Agenda packet, first session — Glendale City Council, November 4, 2025 (part 3 of 4)

Document NumberAgency Index
BPELSG-2016

ALL MONUMENTS FOUND OR SET ARE FLUSH UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED BEING A SURVEY OF:
820 N CENTRAL AVE

IN THE CITY OF
TAX APN:

GLENDALE
, THOMAS GUIDE5644-003-033564-E3 5644-003-073
5644-003-081
C
Filename Z:\MAP\4685\4685-ALTA-ADS-EXPORT , was plotted on: 2025/04/08 By:Jon Hennon 598 of 918

S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
300

SET CHIS X
N: 8546.42 E: 9229.38
EL=563.57
301

SET CHIS X
N: 8518.04 E: 9082.78
EL=560.97 302

SET CHIS X
N: 8502.97 E: 8937.66
EL=559.17
303

SET MAG NAIL
N: 8384.91 E: 9242.73
EL=565.64
304

SET MAG NAIL
N: 8389.48 E: 9072.89
EL=561.82
306

SET CHIS X
N:8360.443
E:9016.134
EL=560.72
EEE
EEEEE
EEE
E
EE
E
E
E
EE
EEE
EE
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
N89°26'00"E
243.58'
S0°15'30"E
392.57'
N89°26'00"E
122.58'
N89°26'00"E
171.00'
N0°15'05"W
146.58'
N0°13'49"W
146.59'
N0°14'14"W
146.58'
N0°14'39"W
146.58'
N89°26'16"E

6.50'
N0°13'42"W
186.00'
S0°15'30"E
186.00'
S0°13'24"E

30.00'
N36°56'49"W

59.79'
S69°21'24"W

60.04'
N69°24'46"E

59.21'
N41°39'54"W

59.32'
L=23.48' R=15.00'
Δ=89°41'30"
S0°15'30"E
131.65'
S0°13'24"E 146.59'
N89°26'16"E 249.98'
S0°15'30"E 146.57'
N89°26'00"E 232.65'
N89°26'00"E

17.42'
N. CENTRAL AVENUE

ARDEN AVENUE
561
561
560
560
560
560
561
561
562
562
562
563
564
565
565
565
R/W
R/W

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE
N79°56'13"W

70.47'
565
565
566
566
566
564
561
560
559
560
561

LOT LINE

S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SSSSS S
SSSSS
S
S
SSSSS
S
SSSSS
S
S
SSSS
S
S
SSSSS
S
S
SSSS
S
S
SSSSS
S
SSSSS
S
S
S
562
561
563
563
566
564
562
563
563
563
564
R/W
EEEEE
S
C
Filename Z:\MAP\4685\4685-ALTA-ADS-EXPORT , was plotted on: 2025/04/08 By:Jon Hennon HE
,
E
INC
&
G

MAPPING

SURVEYIN
NNON

AINROFILAC
N
R
HTUOS
.
1988
599 of 918

600 of 918

UP
S73
S74
S
19 S
17 S
30 S
20 S
18 S
32 S
33 S
31 S
62 S
65 S
66 S
61 S
58 S
3 S
4 S
46 S
21 S
22 S
59 S
69 S
15 S
16 S
25 S
26 S
39 S
45 S
9 S
10 S
7 S
8 S
70 S
55 S
38 S
40 S
41 S
48 S
47 S
72 S
71 S
67 S
68 S
42 S
43 S
56 S
36 S
37 S
60 S
29 S
27 S
5 S
6 S
28 S
50 S
49 S
29 S
51 S
53 S
52 S
54 S
1 S
2 S
63 S
64 S
34 S
35 S
13 S
14 S
11 S
12 S
57 S
23 S
24 F.E.C.

F.E.C.

EDED EDED

ED ED ED
ED
EDEDED
FD
PD
F.E.C.

A5-3
D
A4-4
A
UP
RAMP UP TO P1
ELEV #1 ELEV #2
STAIR #2
STAIR #1
A
27 27
WW
1 1
4 4
B
DD
3 6
11 12
15 14
14 18
18 20
22 22 23
24 24 26
N
Q
Q
X
X
G
7 5 8
A5-1
B

7.5%

STORAGE ROOM
7'-0" TALL CEILING,
MIN.
19 191713
C
T
J
25' - 0" 18' - 0" 18' - 0" 25' - 0" 18' - 0" 18' - 0" 3' - 6" CLR . SHAFT
19' - 8"
ELEV.

LOBBY
A.O.S
MACH. RM
A5-2
C
A5-4
E
9 16
ø 6' - 0"

MECHSTORAGE
6"
10' - 6" 8' - 6" 9' - 9" 1' - 4 1/2" 9' - 7" 10' - 2 3/4" 9' - 7" 9' - 5 3/8" 9' - 7" 1' - 4" 19' - 3 3/4" 1' - 4" 9' - 7" 9' - 7" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 4" 9' - 7" 9' - 7" 1' - 4" 9' - 7" 9' - 7" 10' - 6" 11' - 0" 8' - 6" 9' - 7 3/8"
1' - 4"
6' - 2" 23' - 8"

ELEV LOBBY

EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE

EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSEEVSE
EVSE
EVSE

EVSEEVSE

EVSEEVSE EVSE
EVSE
9' - 8" 9' - 7" 9' - 7" 2' - 1 1/8" 10' - 0" 1' - 6" 10' - 3" 6' - 7 1/8" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 3' - 4" 9' - 7" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 9' - 7" 10' - 4" 9' - 7" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 4"
4' - 2"
MECH
GARAGE
EXHAUT

SAND & OIL

INTERCEPTOR

SWEAGE EJECTOR

SUMP PUMP
21 M
K
L
E
8" 23' - 2 7/8" 6' - 10 1/2" 6' - 9 5/8" 28' - 8" 13' - 3 3/16" 11' - 7 1/4" 11' - 10 1/8" 9' - 11 7/8" 2' - 0 1/8"
13' - 3 1/2" 11' - 10 5/8" 30' - 6" 1' - 0" 11' - 11 3/4" 16' - 3 7/8" 13' - 7 1/4" 15' - 11" 2" 6' - 0" 1' - 1 15/16"
4" 31' - 0" 29' - 1 1/2" 30' - 5"
1' - 0"
16' - 1 1/4" 11' - 6 5/8" 8' - 3 1/8" 5' - 11"
1' - 7 11/16"
30' - 1 3/8" 29' - 1 5/8" 2' - 1 1/4" 27' - 9 3/4" 2' - 5 5/8" 20' - 7 3/4" 20' - 10" 29' - 4" 20' - 6" 29' - 11 1/8" 22' - 1" 4" 31' - 0" 14' - 0 3/8" 15' - 1 1/8" 19' - 0 3/8" 9' - 6 9/16" 20' - 2 3/8" 18' - 6 3/4" 6' - 8 15/16" 1' - 11 5/16"
4' - 5 5/8" 4 13/16"
(GUEST)(GUEST)(GUEST)(GUEST) (GUEST)(GUEST)
(GUEST)
(GUEST) (GUEST)(GUEST)
15%
STRG #1 STRG #2 STRG #10
STRG #23STRG #32
STRG #59
4' - 2"
STRG #43
STRG #51
STRG #3 STRG #4 STRG #5 STRG #6 STRG #7 STRG #8 STRG #9 STRG #11 STRG #14 STRG #15 STRG #16 STRG #17 STRG #18 STRG #20
STRG #21STRG #22STRG #24
STRG #26
STRG #27
STRG #28STRG #29STRG #30STRG #31STRG #33STRG #34STRG #35STRG #36STRG #37STRG #38STRG #39STRG #40STRG #41STRG #44 STRG #45STRG #46STRG #47
STRG #49
STRG #50
STRG #52
STRG #53
STRG #57
4' - 0"
CLR.
6' - 11"
11' - 0" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 4" 9' - 7" 8' - 6" 10' - 6" 1' - 4" 9' - 7"10' - 6"
3' - 4" 18' - 0" 18' - 0" 25' - 2" 18' - 0" 18' - 0"
4 1/2"
8" 8' - 2"
CLR.
3' - 11"
2 U
V
25 10
N. CENTRAL AVE

ARDEN AVE

DRY WELL

PROPERTY
135' - 4 3/16"
4' - 6 1/2"

BUILDING
235' - 7 1/2"
4"

PROPERTY
240' - 6"
11"

BUILDING
132' - 9 1/2" 1' - 7 11/16"
3' - 8 3/16"

BUILDING
235' - 7 1/2"
1' - 1 15/16"
4"

BUILDING
140' - 7 5/16" 4 13/16"
S
F
STRG #12 STRG #13 STRG #19
STRG #56
OTIS GEN-3
4000 lbs,
350 FPM
OTIS GEN-3
4000 lbs,
350 FPM
STRG #42
STRG #58
STRG #25
STRG #48
STRG #54
STRG #55
STRG #60
CLR.
3' - 9 7/8"
CLR.
3' - 11" C.3C.3
H
R
R
1% SLOPE
539.39
539.19539.39
539.39 539.39
539.39
538.76
539.0 539.0 539.0
539.0
539.39
548.31
548.31
548.31 548.31 548.31 548.31
548.31
548.39
544.89
544.89
548.39
1% SLOPE
+539.18
+539.18
9' - 7" 2' - 0"
+539.38
+539.24
539.15
+539.15
+539.01
539.24
539.01
539.02
+539.02
PROPERTY141' - 4 3/16"

PROPERTY
240' - 5 9/16"
23 1
21 38
17 1
24 22
24 21
96" TALL IN-TAKE LOUVER
96" TALL A.O.S LOUVER
18 18
18 18 18 18
18 18 18 18 18
18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18
181818181818
18 18
18 18
18 18
18 18
18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18
18 18
18 18 18 18 18
17-R UP.
@ 6.70" EACH
17-R UP.
@ 6.70" EACH

CMU WALL
3-HOUR RATED CONCRETE WALL / COLUMN
AT TYPE I-A CONSTRUCITON FROM P2-3RD FLR
1-HOUR FIRE RATED FIRE BARRIER / OR FIRE

PARTION WALL
2-HOUR FIRE RATED FIRE BARRIER WALL
3-HOUR RATED FIRE WALL / or FIRE BARRIER
2-HOUR FIRE RATED EXTERIOR WOOD BEARING

WALL , PER TYPE III-A CONSTRUCTION FROM
4TH-8TH FLOORS
(1 HOUR FIRE RATING APPLIES TO ALL INTERIOR
BEARING WALLS. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWG

FOR LOCATION)

PLUMBING WALL

EXIT SIGN

LEGEND FLOOR PLAN
#
#
DOOR TAG, SEE SHEET A6-0
WINDOW TAG, SEE SHEET A6-1
STOREFRONT TAG @ 1ST FLR, SEE SHEET A6-2

KEYNOTE TAG

ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL

FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET

FLOOR DRAIN / AREA DRAIN

PLANTER DRAIN

HARDWIRED CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR

WITH BATTERY BACK-UP

HARDWIRED SMOKE DETECTOR WITH BATTERY
BACK-UP. SMOKE DETECTOR SHALL EMIT A
SIGNAL WHEN THE BATTERIES ARE LOW.

CO
S
#

1. 2.

3. FAN / VENTILATION

ENERGY STAR COMPLIANT

DUCTED TO TERMINATE TO THE OUTSIDE

OF THE BUILDING

CONTROL BY HUMIDITY CONTRLOER
F
X
X-BD
X0X
XXXX

UNIT TYPE (SEE UNIT PLAN SHEET)

NUMBER OF BEDROOMS

UNIT NUMBER

UNIT AREA (MEASURED TO CENTER OF

DEMISING/CORRIDOR WALLS)
TYPICAL:
5'-0" TURN AROUND AND

MAEUVERING CLEAR SPACE

CLASS-I STANDPIPE
#
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

URBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:

REVISIONS:

SUBMITTAL:

JOB NUMBER:

THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN ARE THE COPYRIGHTED WORK OF URBAN

DESIGN SPECIALISTS AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED

WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
820 N. CENTRAL AVENUE
GLENDALE, CA 91203
-
10/6/2025 10:27:28 AM

CENTRAL LOFTS
A3-0.1
P2- GARAGE
PLAN
105-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING
N
1/8" = 1'-0"
P2- GARAGE
601 of 918

S
19 S
17 S
23 S
31 S
18 S
33 S
34 S
24 S
32 S
62 S
65 S
1 S
2 S
63 S
64 S
13 S
14 S
66 S
61 S
11 S
12 S
58 S
3 S
4 DN
S
46 S
21 S
22 S
59 S
69 S
15 S
16 S
25 S
26 S
40 S
45 S
9 S
10 S
7 S
8 S
70 S
57 S
55 S
39 S
41 S
42 S
48 S
47 S
72 S
71 S
67 S
68 UP
S
43 S
44 S
56 S
37 S
38 S
60 S
29 S
27 S
5 S
6 S
28 S
50 S
49 S
35 S
36 S
30 SS
53 S
52 S
54 EDED EDED
FD
F.E.C.

DN
UP S
20 F.E.C.

EDED

ED ED ED
FD
PD
F.E.C.

A5-3
D
25' - 0" 18' - 0" 18' - 0" 25' - 0" 18' - 0" 18' - 0" 3' - 6" RAMP DN. TO P2 RAMP UP TO 1ST FLOOR
STAIR #1
STAIR #2
10' - 6" 8' - 6" 9' - 9" 1' - 4"
ELEV.

LOBBY
A.O.S
ELEV #1 ELEV #2
A4-4
A

7.5%
UP
DN
A
27 27
N. CENTRAL AVE

ARDEN AVE

PROPERTY
135' - 4 3/16"
4' - 6 1/2"

BUILDING
235' - 7 1/2"
4"
WW
15%7.5% 15%
1 1
4 4
B
DD
3 6
11 12
15 14
14 18 20
22 22 23
24 26
N
Q
Q
XX
4" 31' - 0" 14' - 0 3/8" 15' - 1 1/8" 19' - 0 3/8" 9' - 6 9/16" 20' - 2 3/8" 18' - 6 3/4" 6' - 8 15/16" 1' - 11 5/16"
4' - 5 5/8" 4 13/16"
G
7 5
10' - 6" 8' - 6" 9' - 7 3/8"
1' - 4"
6' - 2" 23' - 8" 9' - 8" 9' - 7" 9' - 7" 2' - 0" 10' - 0" 1' - 10 1/8" 10' - 0" 6' - 7 1/8" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 3' - 4" 31' - 0" 28' - 10 1/2" 3" 30' - 5" 1' - 0" 16' - 1 1/4" 11' - 6 5/8" 8' - 3 1/8" 5' - 11" 1' - 7 11/16"

PROPERTY
240' - 6"
22' - 4 3/8"

BUILDING
111' - 4 1/8" 1' - 7 11/16"
3' - 8 3/16"

BUILDING
235' - 7 1/2"
1' - 1 15/16"
2' - 0" 9' - 7" 9' - 5 3/8" 9' - 7" 1' - 4" 19' - 3 3/4" 1' - 4" 9' - 7" 9' - 7" 2' - 0" 9' - 7" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 4" 9' - 7" 9' - 7" 1' - 4" 9' - 7" 9' - 7" 10' - 8" 9' - 7" 8' - 6"
8 A5-1
B
9' - 7"
1' - 4"
4' - 2"

STORAGE ROOM
7'-0" TALL CEILING, MIN.
9' - 7" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 2' - 1 7/8" 9' - 7" 9' - 7"
CLR. SHAFT
19' - 8"
1917
13 23' - 2 7/8" 6' - 10 1/2" 6' - 9 5/8" 28' - 8" 13' - 3 3/16" 11' - 7 1/4" 11' - 10 1/8" 9' - 11 7/8" 2' - 0 1/8" 13' - 3 1/2" 11' - 10 5/8" 30' - 6" 1' - 0" 11' - 11 3/4" 16' - 3 7/8" 29' - 6 1/4" 2" 6' - 0" 1' - 1 15/16"
C
T
J
5"
30' - 1 3/8" 29' - 1 5/8" 2' - 1 1/4" 30' - 3 3/8" 20' - 7 3/4" 20' - 10" 29' - 4" 20' - 6" 29' - 11 1/8" 22' - 1" 20' - 7"
MECH
MECH
GARAGE A.O.S.

ELEV. LOBBY
18' - 0"18' - 0"25' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"
3' - 6"1' - 6"
20' - 0"
A5-2
C
10' - 8"
3' - 2" 4' - 4" 3' - 2"
A5-4
E
9 16

DRY WELL
233' - 5 1/2"
9' - 0"
26' - 10"

TRASH / REC RM

FIRE PUMP RM MPOE

INVERTER ROOM
GARAGE
EXHAUT

EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE

EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE

EVSE EVSE EVSEEVSE

EVSE EVSEEVSEEVSE EVSE
21 M
K
L
E
ø 6' - 0"STRG #1 STRG #2 STRG #3 STRG #4 STRG #5 STRG #6 STRG #7 STRG #8 STRG #10 STRG #16
4' - 2"
STRG #34
7' - 6" 5' - 8" 5' - 9" 5' - 9" 5' - 9" 5' - 9" 5' - 5" 5' - 5" 5' - 5" 5' - 5" 5' - 5" 5' - 5" 5' - 5" 5' - 5" 5' - 3" 6' - 11" 6' - 0" 6' - 0" 6' - 0" 6' - 0"
8' - 8"9' - 0"
5' - 10" 5' - 10" 5' - 10" 5' - 10"
STRG #25 STRG #17STRG #18STRG #19STRG #20
STRG #21 STRG #22
STRG #23STRG #24STRG #26STRG #27STRG #28STRG # 29STRG #30STRG #31STRG #32STRG #33STRG #35 6' - 0" 6' - 7"18' - 3" 7' - 0" 5' - 11" 5' - 11" 6' - 4" 6' - 4" 6' - 4" 6' - 4" 6' - 4" STRG #36STRG #37STRG #38STRG #39
9' - 7" 10' - 3 1/4" 9' - 7"
8' - 2"
8"
4 1/2"
18' - 0"18' - 0"25' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"4' - 1 5/8"
3' - 11"
9' - 0" 9' - 7"
2 U
V
25 10
M.9
4"

BUILDING
140' - 7 5/16" 4 13/16"
S
F
STRG #9
OTIS GEN-3
4000 lbs,
350 FPM
OTIS GEN-3
4000 lbs,
350 FPM
STRG #11 STRG #12 STRG #13 STRG #14 STRG #15
2' - 6"
2' - 1"
STRG #40
STRG #41
STRG #42STRG #43
STRG #44
STRG #45
(accessible)(accessible) (accessible) (accessible) (accessible) (accessible) C.3
P
H
R
548.89
548.69
1%
548.89

0.8%

1.76%1.75%

0.8%
548.39
548.51
548.26
548.51 548.51 548.51
548.26 548.26
548.51
548.51
548.81 548.81
548.81
548.81 548.81 548.81
548.89548.89
548.89
548.89
548.89
548.89
548.68
+548.68
+548.89 +548.89 +548.89
+548.89
+548.74
+548.65
+548.52
PROPERTY141' - 4 3/16"

PROPERTY
240' - 5 9/16"
23 17
1 1
26 21
24 21 21 21
24 21
1 2
3 4
5 6

BIKE PARKING
6' - 0"
36" 36" 30"
96" TALL IN-TAKE LOUVER
96" TALL A.O.S LOUVER
18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18
18 1818181818
18 1818
18 1818
18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18
18 18
18 18 18 18 18
20-R UP.
@ 6.99" EACH
17-R DN.
@ 6.70" EACH
28-R UP.
@ 6.88" EACH
17-R DN.
@ 6.70" EACH

CMU WALL
3-HOUR RATED CONCRETE WALL / COLUMN
AT TYPE I-A CONSTRUCITON FROM P2-3RD FLR
1-HOUR FIRE RATED FIRE BARRIER / OR FIRE

PARTION WALL
2-HOUR FIRE RATED FIRE BARRIER WALL
3-HOUR RATED FIRE WALL / or FIRE BARRIER
2-HOUR FIRE RATED EXTERIOR WOOD BEARING

WALL , PER TYPE III-A CONSTRUCTION FROM
4TH-8TH FLOORS
(1 HOUR FIRE RATING APPLIES TO ALL INTERIOR
BEARING WALLS. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWG

FOR LOCATION)

PLUMBING WALL

EXIT SIGN

LEGEND FLOOR PLAN
#
#
DOOR TAG, SEE SHEET A6-0
WINDOW TAG, SEE SHEET A6-1
STOREFRONT TAG @ 1ST FLR, SEE SHEET A6-2

KEYNOTE TAG

ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL

FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET

FLOOR DRAIN / AREA DRAIN

PLANTER DRAIN

HARDWIRED CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR

WITH BATTERY BACK-UP

HARDWIRED SMOKE DETECTOR WITH BATTERY
BACK-UP. SMOKE DETECTOR SHALL EMIT A
SIGNAL WHEN THE BATTERIES ARE LOW.

CO
S
#

1. 2.

3. FAN / VENTILATION

ENERGY STAR COMPLIANT

DUCTED TO TERMINATE TO THE OUTSIDE

OF THE BUILDING

CONTROL BY HUMIDITY CONTRLOER
F
X
X-BD
X0X
XXXX

UNIT TYPE (SEE UNIT PLAN SHEET)

NUMBER OF BEDROOMS

UNIT NUMBER

UNIT AREA (MEASURED TO CENTER OF

DEMISING/CORRIDOR WALLS)
TYPICAL:
5'-0" TURN AROUND AND

MAEUVERING CLEAR SPACE

CLASS-I STANDPIPE
#
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

URBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:

REVISIONS:

SUBMITTAL:

JOB NUMBER:

THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN ARE THE COPYRIGHTED WORK OF URBAN

DESIGN SPECIALISTS AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED

WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
820 N. CENTRAL AVENUE
GLENDALE, CA 91203
-
10/6/2025 10:27:29 AM

CENTRAL LOFTS
A3-0.2
P1 GARAGE
PLAN
105-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING
N
1/8" = 1'-0"
P1- GARAGE
602 of 918

S
W
356
621.99
ADJ LN
508
566.16
7" TREE
510
566.43
GS NG
702
560.88
WV
L=23.47' R=15.00'
∆=89°39'00"
146.35'
131.44'
M
M
M
M
S
15 S
13 S
35 S
25 S
26 S
9 S
7 S
31 S
27 S
28 S
32 S
19 S
20 S
1 S
36 S
11 S
5 UP
DN
S
16 S
14 S
12 DN
S
10 S
8 S
6 S 4
S 3
S
29 S
30 S
2 S
23 S
24 S
17 S
18 S
37 S
39 S
33 S
34 S
38 S
40 S 41
S
21 S
22 EDED EDED
F.E.C.

F.E.C.

UP
DN
UP

ED FD ED
FD
FD
FD
PD
F.E.C.

N. CENTRAL AVE

ARDEN AVE
PL. (E)
(el. +565.18)
(el. +566.40)
(el. +560.80)
(el. +560.26)
(el. +559.95)
A5-3
D

PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
(OPEN TO SKY)
3,450 S/F
4' - 5"
9' - 7" 5' - 0" 9' - 7" 1' - 4" 19' - 4" 1' - 4" 9' - 7" 9' - 7" 2' - 0" 9' - 7" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 4" 9' - 7" 9' - 7" 1' - 4" 9' - 7" 9' - 1" 9' - 7" RAMP DN. TO P1
RAMP DN.

STAIR #1
ELEV #1 ELEV #2(RESIDENTIAL
VAN)

ENTRY ROLL
UP GATE #1
A4-4
A
(FOR TENANTS ONLY)
27 27

DEDICATION
7' - 0"

PROPERTY
240' - 5 1/2"LOT
247' - 7"
LOT
146' - 4 1/4"

PROPERTY
141' - 4 1/4"

DEDICATION
5' - 0"
LOT
146' - 4 3/16"PROPERTY
135' - 4 3/16"

DEDICATION
11' - 0"
R.1
W

TRANSFORMER RM

ELECTRICAL

POOL ROOM
LOBBY
STAIR#2
1 1
4 4
7' - 11" 9' - 7" 9' - 7" 2' - 0" 10' - 0" 1' - 10" 10' - 0" 2' - 0" 9' - 7" 9' - 7" 3' - 6" 3' - 0" 22' - 0" 5' - 5" 8" 7' - 6" 8" 8' - 6" 1' - 2" 22' - 6" 8" 5' - 10" 8" 4' - 0" B
DD
3 11
12 15
14 18
18 20
22 22 23
24 24 26
N
Q
Q
X
G
7 5
23' - 3" 6' - 10" 6' - 10" 28' - 8" 24' - 10" 11' - 10" 12' - 0" 13' - 4" 5' - 6" 6' - 4" 23' - 0" 7' - 6" 1' - 0" 12' - 0" 16' - 4" 13' - 7" 15' - 11" 2" 6' - 0" 8' - 8" 19' - 0" 29' - 9" 18' - 7" 8' - 8"
3' - 1 11/16"

BUILDING
131' - 10 1/2"4"

POOL / SPA ABOVE
31' - 0" 29' - 2" 67' - 4"
30' - 1 3/8" 31' - 2 7/8" 27' - 9 3/4" 2' - 5 5/8" 20' - 7 3/4" 27' - 2 1/4" 43' - 5 3/4" 29' - 11 1/8" 22' - 1"

BUILDING
236' - 3 1/2" 4"

DEDICATION
7' - 0"

PROPERTY
240' - 6"
LOT
247' - 6"

BUILDING
231' - 7 3/8" 4' - 8 1/8" 1' - 1 15/16"
8 PL.

PL. (N)
A5-1
B
(FOR TENANTS ONLY)
PL. (E)
PL. (N)
3' - 6"
18' - 0"18' - 0"3' - 7"
8"
20' - 0"
11' - 0"

STORAGE
(RESIDENTIAL

VAN) EVCS
PCKG
1,500 S/F
19 191713
4' - 0"
C
T
J
MECH
ELEC. RM

CONCIERGE
& LEASING
20' - 0"
9' - 7" 10' - 6"

MAIL BOX

GYM STORAGE
9' - 0"ELEV.

LOBBY
A.O.S
A5-2
C
A5-4
E
8"10' - 1 3/4"7 1/4"4' - 0"
7 1/4"
10' - 7 3/4"8"

PUMP RM
+563.75
28' - 6" 9' - 0"

ROOM (TO BE

ASSIGNED)
9 16
ø 6' - 0"

DRY WELL
28' - 6"
MIN. CLR.
30' - 0"
MIN. CLR.
30' - 0"
15%
TRENCH DRAIN7.5%
+564.33
+564.58

OPENING
13' - 0"

GAS METER ROOM

EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSE EVSEEVSE
21 M
K
L
E

EXIT PASSAGEWAY

8.33% MAX
DN
2' - 6"
RAMP
(STANDARD

ACCESS)
(STANDARD

ACCESS)
560.01
564.29

7.5%
564.66564.66
564.71
FEMALE
MALE
3' - 6 1/2"
18' - 0" 18' - 0" 28' - 5 7/8"
5' - 11 5/8" 18' - 0" 27' - 6 7/8" 18' - 0" 18' - 0" 6' - 3 7/16" 564.58
15%
1' - 7"
21' - 0"
3' - 7"23' - 10 1/8"
3' - 6" 3' - 6"
3' - 6"
2 U
V
25 10
M.9
TRENCH
DRAIN
A3-40
12 S
F
9' - 0" 8' - 0" 9' - 0"
11"
OTIS GEN-3
4000 lbs,
350 FPM
OTIS GEN-3
4000 lbs,
350 FPM
6" CMU RETAINING WALL
CLR.
32"
CLR.
44"
C.3
P
H
R
10' - 0" 10' - 0"

ROLL UP
GATE #2

KEY PAD,
ENTRY
12" ELEVATED

SURFACE,

PAINT STRIP

OF YELLOW
560.91
LOBBY
+560.39
GYM
+560.39
REC. ROOM
+560.91
REC. RM
+560.39

BEAM , BELOW
TRENCH
DRAIN
ROOM
+564.58
565.17

7.41%

0.62%
GAS RM
+565.25
6' - 9"5' - 0"26' - 2 11/16"5' - 0"
559.98
1% SLOPE
560.39
560.01
560.01
1% SLOPE
1% SLOPE
1%

1.88% SLOPE MAX.

7.5%

1.05%

0.95%
560.39
560.28 560.39

1.93%

2.03%
+559.98
559.98
37' - 0 7/8"

BUILDING
100' - 11 7/8" 3' - 3 7/16"
2 1
28 9
3 17
10 20
29 11
29 7
27 12
13 36
20 1
19 37
16 14
14 9
15 A
B
C
D
E F
G H
J

K L M N
A3-40
14 25-R UP.
@ 6.96" EACH
20-R DN.
@ 6.99" EACH
8-R DN.
@ 6.83" EACH
18-R UP.
@ 6.87" EACH
28-R DN.
@ 6.88" EACH
A3-35
1 CMU WALL
3-HOUR RATED CONCRETE WALL / COLUMN
AT TYPE I-A CONSTRUCITON FROM P2-3RD FLR
1-HOUR FIRE RATED FIRE BARRIER / OR FIRE

PARTION WALL
2-HOUR FIRE RATED FIRE BARRIER WALL
3-HOUR RATED FIRE WALL / or FIRE BARRIER
2-HOUR FIRE RATED EXTERIOR WOOD BEARING

WALL , PER TYPE III-A CONSTRUCTION FROM
4TH-8TH FLOORS
(1 HOUR FIRE RATING APPLIES TO ALL INTERIOR
BEARING WALLS. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWG

FOR LOCATION)

PLUMBING WALL

EXIT SIGN

LEGEND FLOOR PLAN
#
#
DOOR TAG, SEE SHEET A6-0
WINDOW TAG, SEE SHEET A6-1
STOREFRONT TAG @ 1ST FLR, SEE SHEET A6-2

KEYNOTE TAG

ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL

FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET

FLOOR DRAIN / AREA DRAIN

PLANTER DRAIN

HARDWIRED CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR

WITH BATTERY BACK-UP

HARDWIRED SMOKE DETECTOR WITH BATTERY
BACK-UP. SMOKE DETECTOR SHALL EMIT A
SIGNAL WHEN THE BATTERIES ARE LOW.

CO
S
#

1. 2.

3. FAN / VENTILATION

ENERGY STAR COMPLIANT

DUCTED TO TERMINATE TO THE OUTSIDE

OF THE BUILDING

CONTROL BY HUMIDITY CONTRLOER
F
X
X-BD
X0X
XXXX

UNIT TYPE (SEE UNIT PLAN SHEET)

NUMBER OF BEDROOMS

UNIT NUMBER

UNIT AREA (MEASURED TO CENTER OF

DEMISING/CORRIDOR WALLS)
TYPICAL:
5'-0" TURN AROUND AND

MAEUVERING CLEAR SPACE

CLASS-I STANDPIPE
#
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

URBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:

REVISIONS:

SUBMITTAL:

JOB NUMBER:

THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN ARE THE COPYRIGHTED WORK OF URBAN

DESIGN SPECIALISTS AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED

WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
820 N. CENTRAL AVENUE
GLENDALE, CA 91203
-
10/6/2025 10:27:30 AM

CENTRAL LOFTS
A3-1
1ST FLOOR
PLAN
105-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING
N
1/8" = 1'-0"
1ST FLOOR
603 of 918

UP DN
F.E.C.

F.E.C.

FD
OD
FD
DN
UP

FDFDFDFDFD
FD

FD FD FD
FD
FD
FD
FDFDFD
FDFD
FDFD
FD
FD
FD
FD
OD

OD OD OD ODOD
OD
OD
OD
OD
OD
OD
FD
FD
SCO
SS
S S
SCO
SCO
S
S
SCO
S
S
SCO
SCO
S
SCO
S S
S CO
S
S CO
S
S CO
S
S
S CO
S
S
SCO
S
S
S CO
S
S
SCO
S
S
SCO
S
S
S CO
S
S
SCO
S
SSSS
SS
S
S
FD
PD
F.E.C.

A5-3
D
A4-4
A
27 27
R.1

OPEN TO BELOW

POOL DECK
714 SF
L.1
1-BD
214
729 SF
J.1
1-BD
213
1,108 SF
H.1
2-BD
211
1,115 SF
F.4
2-BD
212

POOLSPA

WALK-IN
CL.

BATH
BEDRM
KIT.

LIV.

KIT.

BATH #1
BATH
#2
BDRM
#2
BDRM
#1
LIV.

BEDRM
CL.

W/D
BATH
KIT.

BATH #1 BATH #2
KIT. DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH #1
KIT.DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH #1 BATH #2
KIT.

DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH #1 BATH
#2
KIT.

DIN.LIV.BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH
#2
KIT. DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#2
WALK-
IN CL.

W/D
BATH
#1
BDRM
#1

WALK-IN
CL.

BATH #2
KIT.

DIN.

LIV.

BDRM #
2 CL.

W/D
COAT
BATH
#1
BDRM
#1
BATH
#2
KIT.

DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#2
WALK-
IN CL.

W/D
BATH #1
BDRM
#1

PATIO PATIO PATIO PATIO
BDRM
#1 BATH

BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY
TRASH
LOBBY

C O R R I D O R
STAIR#1
STAIR#1
KIT.

BATH #1
DIN.

WALK-IN CL.

LIV.

BDRM
#1
ELEV #1
1,127 SF
F.1
2-BD
210
1,119 SF
F.5
2-BD
208
1,113 SF
F.2
2-BD
206
1,021 SF
A.1
2-BD
201
981 SF
B.1
2-BD
203
643 SF
E.1
1-BD
205
1,138 SF
P.1
2-BD
207
1,114 SF
F.3
2-BD
209
1,011 SF
K.1
2-BD
215
842 SF
D.2
1-BD
202

C O R R I D O R
CL
W/D
1 1
4 4
WALK-IN CL.

WALK-IN
CL
DIN.

LIV.

KIT.

PATIO
CL
ELEV #2
BDRM
#2
LIV.

DIN.

LIV.

KIT.

BATH
#1
BATH
#2
BDRM
#2
BDRM
#2
DIN.

LIV DIN
DIN.

BALCONY
CL
W/D
B
DD
3 12
15 14
14 18
18 20
22 22 23
24 24
26 26
N
Q
Q
G
7 5 8
BDRM
#1
BATH
#2
BATH
#1
W
BATH
#2
KIT
PL.

A5-1
B

P O O L F E N C E

COAT COAT
W/D

CANOPY BELOW

CANOPY BELOW
UNIT
34' - 7 3/4" 8 1/4"
UNIT
56' - 4 3/8" 1' - 0"
MEN
WOMEN
6"
UNIT
34' - 0 3/8" 8 1/4"
UNIT
40' - 8 3/4" 1' - 0"
19 19
17 17
13 13
C
I.T. ELEC.

ELEC
6"
UNIT
38' - 6 1/8" 8 1/4"
UNIT
28' - 10 1/2" 1' - 0"
UNIT
34' - 2 1/4"

FIRE BARRIER
8 1/4"
UNIT
34' - 7 3/4" 8 1/4"

WALK -IN
CL.

WALK-IN CL.

J
5' - 0"
3 5/8" 6' - 2 3/8" 6"
UNIT
28' - 4 1/4" 8 1/4"
DIN.

BDRM
BATH
KIT.

LIV.

CL.

WALK
IN CL
GARAGE

VENTILATION

TRASH RM

VENTILATION
A5-2
C
5' - 6"
10' - 4"
A5-4
E

GARAGE FRESH AIR
W/D
9 16
CL
UNIT
34' - 7 3/4" 8 1/4"
UNIT
34' - 7 3/4"

FIRE BARRIER
8 1/4"
UNIT
34' - 7 3/4" 8 1/4"
UNIT
34' - 7 3/4" 8 1/4"
UNIT
21' - 0 3/8" 6"
6"
UNIT
30' - 1 5/8"8 1/4"
UNIT
38' - 4"8 1/4"
UNIT
31' - 1 7/8"6"
DIN
COAT
W/D
D/W

A/C FOR TRASH LOBBY

C O R R I D O R
CORR. VENT
CORR. VENT
21 M
K
L
E

POOL SHOWERS
1,125 SF
C.1
2-BD
204
F.D O.D F.D F.D O.D F.D F.D O.D F.D
WALK-IN CL.
33' - 11 5/8"
CL
BDRM
#1
2 U
V
25 25
6"
UNIT
32' - 5 1/4" 6"
2% SLOPE
M.9
N. CENTRAL AVE

ARDEN AVE
W/D
S
F
22" MIN.
34"
D
4' - 0"
CL
OTIS GEN-3
4000 lbs,
350 FPM
OTIS GEN-3
4000 lbs,
350 FPM
COAT
C.3
P
H
R
R
COAT
4' - 0"
COAT
CL

TRENCH DRAIN

POOL RM

VENTILATION
SHAFT
2 10
212
9"
9 5/8" 1' - 2 3/8" 9"
9"
9"
2%
2%
2%
1' - 0 5/16"

BUILDING
234' - 11 3/8" 4' - 5 15/16"
1' - 3 11/16"

BUILDING
104' - 10 5/8"35' - 1 7/8"
1' - 10 1/4"

BUILDING
238' - 3 3/4" 4"
35 U6
U2
U2
U2
U2
U2
U2
U3
U3
U3
U3
U3
U3
U4 U5
U4
U6
U6
U2
U3
U6
U6
U2
U3
U1
U1
U6
U6
U1
U1
U1
U1
U1
U4
U2
U4
U3
U7
U2 U2
U4
U24
U3
U3
4 U5U4 U5
30 30
32 33
U1
33 1
U1
U1
66 U2
U2
U3
U3
U4U5
U6
U6
U1
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4U5
U6
U6
U1
U1
U1
U1
U3
U3
U14
U4
35 2534
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4 U5
U6
U6
U6
31 U2
U2
U3
U3
U4 U5
U6
U3
U3
U3
U14
U3
U12
U10
U13
U3U2
U6
U4
U3
U2
U5
U9
1 U9
U3
U2
U2
U3
U4
U7
U16
U18
U17 U17
U17
U17 U17 U17 U17
U23U23U23U23 U23
U5
U11
U5
U17
U9
COAT
U4
U15
33 2 2 7
22225
2 3333333
2 2 2 55
14 2
5 2
2 3
3 2
2 2
13 25-R DN.
@ 6.96" EACH
18-R UP.
@ 6.67" EACH
18-R DN.
@ 6.87" EACH
18-R UP.
@ 6.67" EACH
A3-35
2 8-R DN.
@ 6.93" EACH
7-R DN.
@ 6.57" EACH
DN
DN

CMU WALL
3-HOUR RATED CONCRETE WALL / COLUMN
AT TYPE I-A CONSTRUCITON FROM P2-3RD FLR
1-HOUR FIRE RATED FIRE BARRIER / OR FIRE

PARTION WALL
2-HOUR FIRE RATED FIRE BARRIER WALL
3-HOUR RATED FIRE WALL / or FIRE BARRIER
2-HOUR FIRE RATED EXTERIOR WOOD BEARING

WALL , PER TYPE III-A CONSTRUCTION FROM
4TH-8TH FLOORS
(1 HOUR FIRE RATING APPLIES TO ALL INTERIOR
BEARING WALLS. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWG

FOR LOCATION)

PLUMBING WALL

EXIT SIGN

LEGEND FLOOR PLAN
#
#
DOOR TAG, SEE SHEET A6-0
WINDOW TAG, SEE SHEET A6-1
STOREFRONT TAG @ 1ST FLR, SEE SHEET A6-2

KEYNOTE TAG

ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL

FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET

FLOOR DRAIN / AREA DRAIN

PLANTER DRAIN

HARDWIRED CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR

WITH BATTERY BACK-UP

HARDWIRED SMOKE DETECTOR WITH BATTERY
BACK-UP. SMOKE DETECTOR SHALL EMIT A
SIGNAL WHEN THE BATTERIES ARE LOW.

CO
S
#

1. 2.

3. FAN / VENTILATION

ENERGY STAR COMPLIANT

DUCTED TO TERMINATE TO THE OUTSIDE

OF THE BUILDING

CONTROL BY HUMIDITY CONTRLOER
F
X
X-BD
X0X
XXXX

UNIT TYPE (SEE UNIT PLAN SHEET)

NUMBER OF BEDROOMS

UNIT NUMBER

UNIT AREA (MEASURED TO CENTER OF

DEMISING/CORRIDOR WALLS)
TYPICAL:
5'-0" TURN AROUND AND

MAEUVERING CLEAR SPACE

CLASS-I STANDPIPE
#
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

URBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:

REVISIONS:

SUBMITTAL:

JOB NUMBER:

THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN ARE THE COPYRIGHTED WORK OF URBAN

DESIGN SPECIALISTS AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED

WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
820 N. CENTRAL AVENUE
GLENDALE, CA 91203
-
10/6/2025 10:27:36 AM

CENTRAL LOFTS
A3-2
2ND FLOOR
PLAN
105-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING
N
1/8" = 1'-0"
2ND FLOOR
604 of 918

DN
F.E.C.

F.E.C.

FD
OD
FD
UP
DN
UP
SCO
SS
S S
SCO
SCO
S
S
SCO
S
S
SCO
SCO
S
SCO
S S
S CO
S
S CO
S
S CO
S
S
S CO
S
S
SCO
S
S
S CO
S
S
SCO
S
S
SCO
S
S
S CO
S
S
SCO
S
SSSS
SS
S
S
S
FD
PD
F.E.C.

A5-3
D
A4-4
A
R.1
1,011 SF
2-BD
315
714 SF
1-BD
314
1,108 SF
H.1
2-BD
311
956 SF
D.1
2-BD
302
981 SF
B.1
2-BD
303
1,023 SF
A.1
2-BD
301
1,115 SF
F.4
2-BD
312
729 SF
1-BD
313
1,127 SF
F.1
2-BD
310
1,114 SF
F.3
2-BD
309
1,119 SF
F.5
2-BD
308
1,138 SF
P.1
2-BD
307
1,113 SF
F.2
2-BD
306
643 SF
E.1
1-BD
305
1 1
4 4
B
D
D
3 11
12 15
15 14
14 18
18 20
20 22
22 23
23 24
24 26
26 N
Q
Q
G
7 5 8
A5-1
B
19 19
17 17
13 13
C
T
J
19' - 8"
ELEC
A5-2
C
A5-4
E
9 16

WALK-IN
CL.

BATH
BEDRM
KIT.

LIV.

W
KIT.

BATH #1
BATH
#2
BDRM
#2
BDRM
#1
LIV.

BEDRM
CL.

W/D
BATH
KIT.

BATH #1 BATH #2
KIT. DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH
#1
KIT.DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH
#1
BATH
#2
KIT.

DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH #1 BATH
#2
KIT.

DIN.LIV.BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH
#2
KIT. DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#2
WALK-
IN CL.

W/D
BATH
#1
BDRM
#1
WALK-
IN CL.

BATH #2
KIT.DIN. LIV.

BDRM #
2 CL.

W/D
COAT
BATH
#1
BDRM
#1
BATH
#2
KIT.DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#2
WALK-
IN CL.

W/D
BATH #1
BDRM
#1

BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY

BDRM BATH

BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY
TRASH
LOBBY

C O R R I D O R
STAIR#1
STAIR#1
KIT.

BATH #1
DIN.

WALK-IN CL.

LIV.

BDRM
#1

C O R R I D O R
CL
W/D
WALK-IN CL.

WALK-IN
CL
DIN.

LIV.

KIT.

BALCONY
CL
BDRM
#2
LIV.

DIN.

LIV.

KIT.

BATH
#1
BATH
RM
BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2
DIN.

LIV DIN
DIN.

BALCONY
CL
W/D
BDRM
#1
BATH
#2 BATH
#1
W
BATH
#2
KIT

COAT COAT
W/D
I.T. ELEC
ELEC

WALK -IN
CL.

WALK-IN
CL.

WALK
IN CL
GARAGE

VENTILATION

TRASH RM

VENTILATION
CL
DIN
COAT
BDRM
#2
CL
W/D
ELEV #1 ELEV #2
WALK-
IN CL
6"
UNIT
38' - 6 1/8" 8 1/4"
UNIT
28' - 9" 8 3/4"
UNIT
34' - 7" 8 1/4"
UNIT
34' - 7 3/4" 8 1/4"
UNIT
34' - 7 3/4" 8 1/4"
UNIT
26' - 8 7/8" 6" 29' - 1 1/2" 1' - 0"
6"
UNIT
30' - 1 5/8"8 1/4"
UNIT
38' - 4 1/8"6"
UNIT
31' - 4"6"
6"
UNIT
32' - 5 1/4" 6"
UNIT
35' - 1 1/4" 8 1/4"
UNIT
34' - 7 3/4" 8 1/4"
UNIT
34' - 7 3/4" 8 1/4"
UNIT
34' - 7 3/4" 8 1/4"
UNIT
34' - 7 3/4" 8 1/4" 21' - 0 3/8" 6"
1' - 0"
UNIT
40' - 8 3/4"8 1/4"
UNIT
34' - 0 3/8"6"
21 21
M
K
L
E
BDRM
#1 CL
1,125 SF
C.1
2-BD
304
2 U
V
25 25

BDRM CL
M.9
N. CENTRAL AVE

ARDEN AVE
D
S
F
OTIS GEN-3
4000 lbs,
350 FPM
OTIS GEN-3
4000 lbs,
350 FPM
D
DIN.

CL
C.3
C.3
P
H
R
R
PL.

Intake Air louvers , per
Mechanical
COAT
8' - 4 3/8"
COAT
CL
W/D
COAT
2%
2%
2%
HSS 8X8 HSS 8X8
HSS 8X8
HSS 8X8HSS 8X8HSS 8X8HSS 8X8HSS 8X8
2' - 3 5/16"

BUILDING
232' - 11 3/8" 5' - 2 15/16"
2' - 6 1/16"

BUILDING
102' - 5 3/4"36' - 4 3/8"
2' - 7 5/16"

BUILDING
77' - 3 3/8"14' - 2 7/16"

POOL RESTROOM
40' - 11 1/16"4"
U2
U3
U2
U3
U3U2
U6
U4
U2
U4
U1
33 3232
U1
U1
U1
6 6
1 U1U1U1U1
U1
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4U5
U6
U6
U1
U1
U1
U1
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4
U6
U6
U5 U1
34 U3
U3
U3
U14
U3
U12
U10
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4U5
U6
U6U2
U2
U3
U3
U4 U5
U6
U6
U2
U4
U3
U7
25 U1
4 U3
U2
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4 U5
U6U13
U5
U9U9
1 U6U2
U2
U3
U3
U5U4
U6
U2 U2
U4
U24
U3
U3
U3
U14
U4
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4 U5
U6
U6
U2
U3
U6
U18
U17
U9
U3
U2
U2
U3
U4
U7
U16
U13
U17
U17
U17 U17
U17
U17
U11
U5
U5
U17
U3
18-R DN.
@ 6.67" EACH
18-R UP.
@ 6.67" EACH
18-R DN.
@ 6.67" EACH
18-R UP.
@ 7" EACH
33 1
1 633333333
411 4
1 1
111
14 114 11
6 1
1 4
1 1
1 9
1 1
1 1

CMU WALL
3-HOUR RATED CONCRETE WALL / COLUMN
AT TYPE I-A CONSTRUCITON FROM P2-3RD FLR
1-HOUR FIRE RATED FIRE BARRIER / OR FIRE

PARTION WALL
2-HOUR FIRE RATED FIRE BARRIER WALL
3-HOUR RATED FIRE WALL / or FIRE BARRIER
2-HOUR FIRE RATED EXTERIOR WOOD BEARING

WALL , PER TYPE III-A CONSTRUCTION FROM
4TH-8TH FLOORS
(1 HOUR FIRE RATING APPLIES TO ALL INTERIOR
BEARING WALLS. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWG

FOR LOCATION)

PLUMBING WALL

EXIT SIGN

LEGEND FLOOR PLAN
#
#
DOOR TAG, SEE SHEET A6-0
WINDOW TAG, SEE SHEET A6-1
STOREFRONT TAG @ 1ST FLR, SEE SHEET A6-2

KEYNOTE TAG

ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL

FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET

FLOOR DRAIN / AREA DRAIN

PLANTER DRAIN

HARDWIRED CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR

WITH BATTERY BACK-UP

HARDWIRED SMOKE DETECTOR WITH BATTERY
BACK-UP. SMOKE DETECTOR SHALL EMIT A
SIGNAL WHEN THE BATTERIES ARE LOW.

CO
S
#

1. 2.

3. FAN / VENTILATION

ENERGY STAR COMPLIANT

DUCTED TO TERMINATE TO THE OUTSIDE

OF THE BUILDING

CONTROL BY HUMIDITY CONTRLOER
F
X
X-BD
X0X
XXXX

UNIT TYPE (SEE UNIT PLAN SHEET)

NUMBER OF BEDROOMS

UNIT NUMBER

UNIT AREA (MEASURED TO CENTER OF

DEMISING/CORRIDOR WALLS)
TYPICAL:
5'-0" TURN AROUND AND

MAEUVERING CLEAR SPACE

CLASS-I STANDPIPE
#
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

URBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:

REVISIONS:

SUBMITTAL:

JOB NUMBER:

THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN ARE THE COPYRIGHTED WORK OF URBAN

DESIGN SPECIALISTS AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED

WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
820 N. CENTRAL AVENUE
GLENDALE, CA 91203
-
10/6/2025 10:27:37 AM

CENTRAL LOFTS
A3-3
3RD FLOOR
PLAN
105-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING
N
1/8" = 1'-0"
3RD FLOOR
605 of 918

UP
F.E.C.

F.E.C.

FD
OD
FD
UP DN
DN
SCO
SS
S S
SCO
SCO
S
S
SCO
S
S
SCO
SCO
S
SCO
S S
S CO
S
S CO
S
S CO
S
S
S CO
S
S
SCO
S
S
S CO
S
S
SCO
S
S
SCO
S
S
S CO
S
S
SCO
S
SSSS
SS
S
S
S
FD
PD
F.E.C.

A5-3
D
1,025 SF
A
2-BD
401
977 SF
B
2-BD
403
1,123 SF
C
2-BD
404
649 SF
E
1-BD
405
1,137 SF
P
2-BD
407
1,191 SF
F
2-BD
406969 SF
D
2-BD
402
1,114 SF
F
2-BD
409
1,123 SF
F.6
2-BD
408
1,204 SF
G
2-BD
410
1,109 SF
H
2-BD
411
749 SF
J
1-BD
413
1,115 SF
G.1
2-BD
412
717 SF
L
1-BD
414
1,034 SF
K
2-BD
415
UNIT
33' - 10 3/4"

FIRE WALL
1' - 4 1/2"
UNIT
34' - 3 3/4" 8"
UNIT
34' - 8" 8"
UNIT
26' - 4 3/8" 10"
UNIT
29' - 1 1/2" 11 1/2"
PL.

A5-1
B
5 1/2"
UNIT
34' - 0 1/2" 8 1/2"
UNIT
40' - 8 1/4" 11 1/2"
CLR. SHAFT
19' - 8"
CLR. SHAFT
6' - 11"
11 1/2"
UNIT
38' - 6 1/8" 8"
UNIT
28' - 10 1/2" 11 1/2"
5 1/2"
UNIT
32' - 4 5/8" 5 1/2"
UNIT
35' - 1 7/8" 8"
UNIT
34' - 3 3/4"

FIRE WALL
1' - 4 1/2"
UNIT
34' - 3 3/4" 8"
UNIT
34' - 8" 8"
UNIT
34' - 8" 8"
UNIT
20' - 11 7/8" 5 1/2"
5 1/2"
UNIT
30' - 1 5/8"8"
UNIT
38' - 4 1/8"8"
UNIT
31' - 1 1/2"5 1/2"
A5-2
C

WALK-IN
CL.

BATH
BEDRM
KIT.

LIV.

W/D
KIT.

BATH #1
BATH
#2
BDRM
#2
BDRM
#1
LIV.

BEDRM
CL.

W/D
BATH
KIT.

BATH #1 BATH #2
KIT. DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH
#1
KIT.DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH
#1
BATH
#2
KIT.

DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH #1 BATH
#2
KIT.

DIN.LIV.BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH
#2
KIT. DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#2
WALK-
IN CL.

W/D
BATH
#1
BDRM
#1
WALK-
IN CL.

BATH #2
KIT.

DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/D
COAT
BATH
#1
BDRM
#1
BATH
#2
KIT.

DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#2
WALK-
IN CL.

W/D
BATH #1
BDRM
#1

BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY

BDRM BATH

BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY
TRASH
LOBBY

C O R R I D O R
STAIR#1
STAIR#1
KIT.

BATH #1
DIN.

WALK-IN CL.

LIV. BDRM
#1

C O R R I D O R
CL
W/D
WALK-IN CL.

WALK-IN
CL
DIN.

LIV.

KIT.

BALCONY

WALK-IN
CL
BDRM
#2
LIV.

DIN.

LIV.

KIT.

BATH
#1
BATH
#2
BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2
DIN.

LIV DINDIN.

BALCONY
CL
W/D
BDRM
#1
BATH
#2 BATH
#1
COAT
BATH
#2
KIT

COAT COAT
W/D
I.T. ELEC
ELEC
WALK -
IN CL.

WALK-IN
CL.

WALK
IN CL
GARAGE

VENTILATION

TRASH RM

VENTILATION
CL
DIN W
BDRM
#2
CL
W/D
ELEV #1 ELEV #2
WALK-
IN CL
BDRM
#3
CL
N. CENTRAL AVE

ARDEN AVE
D
BDRM
CL
W/D
BATH

C O R R I D O R
OTIS GEN-3
4000 lbs,
350 FPM
OTIS GEN-3
4000 lbs,
350 FPM
BATH
#2
COAT
COAT
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2' - 3 5/16"

BUILDING
232' - 10 7/8" 5' - 3 7/16"
2' - 6 1/16"

BUILDING
102' - 5 3/4"36' - 4 3/8"
2' - 7 5/16"

BUILDING
77' - 3 3/8"55' - 5 1/2"
3' - 0 3/4"

BUILDING
232' - 5 1/4" 5' - 0"
25 U1U1
U1U1
U1
U1
U1
U1
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4 U5
U6
U2
U3
U6
U6
U2
U3
U3
U4
U2 U2
U4
U9
U24
U3
1 5
U3
U2
33 U1
33 32
U6U2
U2
U3
U3
U5U4
U1
U1U1
U1
33 U3
U14
U4
1 U3
U3
U2
U6
U9
U3
U12
U10
U1
U4
U6
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4 U5
U6
U6 U2
U2
U3
U3
U4 U5
U6
U6 U2
U2
U3
U3
U4U5
U6
U6
U1
U2
U4
U3
U7
U6
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4U5
U6
U6
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4U5
U6
U6
U16
U3
U2
U2
U3
U4
U7
U16
U17U18
U17U17U17
U17
U17 U17 U17
U3U2
U6
U4
U3
U2
U13
U16
U3
U14
U10
U5
U5
COAT
U15
66 18-R DN.
@ 6.67" EACH
18-R UP.
@ 6.67" EACH
18-R DN.
@ 7" EACH
18-R UP.
@ 6.67" EACH
IN CORRIDOR, TYP. THROUGHOUT
30' - 0" MAX
3 1
1 1 1 1 6
4 1111 1 1 4
33333333
9 4
1 14
4 1
1 11 1
1 1
63 1
1 1

CMU WALL
3-HOUR RATED CONCRETE WALL / COLUMN
AT TYPE I-A CONSTRUCITON FROM P2-3RD FLR
1-HOUR FIRE RATED FIRE BARRIER / OR FIRE

PARTION WALL
2-HOUR FIRE RATED FIRE BARRIER WALL
3-HOUR RATED FIRE WALL / or FIRE BARRIER
2-HOUR FIRE RATED EXTERIOR WOOD BEARING

WALL , PER TYPE III-A CONSTRUCTION FROM
4TH-8TH FLOORS
(1 HOUR FIRE RATING APPLIES TO ALL INTERIOR
BEARING WALLS. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWG

FOR LOCATION)

PLUMBING WALL

EXIT SIGN

LEGEND FLOOR PLAN
#
#
DOOR TAG, SEE SHEET A6-0
WINDOW TAG, SEE SHEET A6-1
STOREFRONT TAG @ 1ST FLR, SEE SHEET A6-2

KEYNOTE TAG

ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL

FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET

FLOOR DRAIN / AREA DRAIN

PLANTER DRAIN

HARDWIRED CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR

WITH BATTERY BACK-UP

HARDWIRED SMOKE DETECTOR WITH BATTERY
BACK-UP. SMOKE DETECTOR SHALL EMIT A
SIGNAL WHEN THE BATTERIES ARE LOW.

CO
S
#

1. 2.

3. FAN / VENTILATION

ENERGY STAR COMPLIANT

DUCTED TO TERMINATE TO THE OUTSIDE

OF THE BUILDING

CONTROL BY HUMIDITY CONTRLOER
F
X
X-BD
X0X
XXXX

UNIT TYPE (SEE UNIT PLAN SHEET)

NUMBER OF BEDROOMS

UNIT NUMBER

UNIT AREA (MEASURED TO CENTER OF

DEMISING/CORRIDOR WALLS)
TYPICAL:
5'-0" TURN AROUND AND

MAEUVERING CLEAR SPACE

CLASS-I STANDPIPE
#
NOTES
8 9
10 11
-LIGHTING AND MECHANICAL FIXTURES MUST BE
SUPPORTED BY ADDITIONAL INDEPENDENT NO.12

GAUGE WIRES ATTACHED TO EACH CORNER OF
FIXTURE. (ASCE 7-16 SECTION 13.5.6, ASTM)
-FIRE/SMOKE DAMPERS ARE REQUIRED, WHEN DUCTS

PENETRATING RATED CORRIDOR WALLS
-A CAL/OSHA PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ELEVATORS OR
WHEELCHAIR LIFTS. THIS MAYBE OBTAINED FROM THE

THE STATE DIVISION OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY &
HEALTH -CAL OSHA ELEVATOR UNIT. CALL (626) 471-6911
-MECHANICALLY VENTILATED BUILDINGS SHALL PROVIDE

REGULARLY OCCUPIED AREAS OF THE BUILDING WITH
MERV 13 FILTER FOR OUTSIDE AND RETURN AIR. FILTERS

SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY AND

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MAINTENANCE WITH FILTERS

OF THE SAME VALUE SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL.

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 -ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF STUD /
CONCRETE / CMU, UNO.
-ALL DIMENSIONS INDICATED AS "CLR" ARE
FROM FINISH TO FINISH.
-ALL DIMENSIONS INDICATED AS "BUILDING" OR
"SETBACK" ARE FROM FINISH TO FINISH.
-EXHAUST LOUVERS TO BE MIN 3'-0" AWAY

FROM OUTSIDE AIR INLETS
-CONTROL JOINTS AT MAX 144SF AND 12'-0" OC
-ALL UNIT MECHANICAL EXHAUST

PENETRATIONS THROUGH WALLS SHALL

TERMINATE WITH SEIHO ALUMINUM VENT CAPS
-EXIT DOORS AND GRILLS SHALL BE OPENABLE

FROM WITHIN WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR

ANY SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT WHEN
THE SPACE IS OCCUPIED. (1010.1.4.4 & 1010.9.3
#2 CBC)
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

URBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:

REVISIONS:

SUBMITTAL:

JOB NUMBER:

THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN ARE THE COPYRIGHTED WORK OF URBAN

DESIGN SPECIALISTS AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED

WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
820 N. CENTRAL AVENUE
GLENDALE, CA 91203
-
10/6/2025 10:27:38 AM

CENTRAL LOFTS
A3-4
4TH FLOOR
PLAN
105-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING
N
1/8" = 1'-0"
4TH FLOOR
606 of 918

UP
UP
DN
F.E.C.

F.E.C.

FD
OD
FD
DN
SCO
SS
S S
SCO
SCO
S
S
SCO
S
S
SCO
SCO
S
SCO
S S
S CO
S
S CO
S
S CO
S
S
S CO
S
S
SCO
S
S
S CO
S
S
SCO
S
S
SCO
S
S
S CO
S
S
SCO
S
SSSS
SS
S
S
S
FD
PD
F.E.C.

A5-3
D
PL.

A5-1
B ELEV #1 ELEV #2

WALK-IN
CL.

BATH
BEDRM
KIT.

LIV.

W
KIT.

BATH #1
BATH
#2
BDRM
#2
BDRM
#1
DIN.

LIV.

BEDRM
CL.

W/D
BATH
KIT.

BATH
#1
BATH
#2
KIT. DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH
#1
BATH
#2
KIT.DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH
#1
BATH
#2
KIT. DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#1 BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH
#1
BATH
#2
KIT.DIN.LIV.BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH
#2
KIT. DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/D
COAT
BATH
#1
BDRM
#1
BATH
#2
KIT.

DIN.

LIV.

BDRM #
2 WALK-IN
CL.

W/D
COAT
BATH
#1
BDRM
#1
BATH
#2
KIT.

DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/D
COAT
BATH
#1
BDRM
#1

BDRM BATH
#2
DIN.

BDRM
BATH
TRASH
LOBBY
KIT.

LIV.

W/D

C O R R I D O R
STAIR#1
STAIR#1
KIT.

BATH
#1
DIN.

WALK-IN CL.

LIV. BDRM
#1

C O R R I D O R
CL
W/D
W/D
CL.

CL.

WALK-IN CL.

WALK-IN
CL
DIN.

LIV.

KIT.

WALK-IN
CL
BDRM
#2
LIV.

DIN.

LIV.

KIT.

BATH
#1
BATH
#2
BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2
DIN.

LIV DINDIN.

BALCONY
CL
W/D
BDRM
#1
BATH
#2
BATH
#1

W D
BDRM
#2
CL
KIT.

WALK-IN CL.

W/D
649 SF
1-BD
504
1,122 SF
C
2-BD
503
972 SF
B
2-BD
502
1,025 SF
A
2-BD
501
969 SF
D.4
2-BD
505
1,114 SF
2-BD
506
1,123 SF
F.6
2-BD
508
1,127 SF
G
2-BD
510
1,115 SF
G.1
2-BD
512
718 SF
1-BD
514
1,028 SF
K
2-BD
515
747 SF
J
1-BD
513
1,106 SF
H
2-BD
5111,112 SF
F
2-BD
509
1,130 SF
P
2-BD
507
ELEC I.T.

I.T.

WALK-IN
CL
A5-2
C

WALK-IN
CL.

FIRE WALL
1' - 4 1/2"
UNIT
34' - 3 3/4" 8"
UNIT
34' - 8" 8"
UNIT
26' - 4 3/8" 10"
UNIT
29' - 2 1/8" 5 1/2"
5 1/2"
UNIT
34' - 0 1/2" 8"
UNIT
40' - 8 3/4" 5 1/2"
5 1/2"
UNIT
38' - 6 1/8" 8"
UNIT
28' - 10 1/2" 11 1/2"
UNIT
33' - 10 3/4"
5 1/2"
UNIT
32' - 4 5/8" 5 1/2"
UNIT
35' - 1 7/8" 8"
UNIT
34' - 3 3/4" FIRE WALL
UNIT
34' - 3 3/4" 8"
UNIT
34' - 8" 8"
UNIT
34' - 8" 8"
UNIT
21' - 0 1/2" 5 1/2"
5 1/2"
UNIT
30' - 1 5/8"8"
UNIT
25' - 5 1/8"5 1/2"
UNIT
44' - 3"6 5/8"
CL

BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY

BALCONYBALCONY BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY
BDRM
#1
N. CENTRAL AVE

ARDEN AVE
OTIS GEN-3
4000 lbs,
350 FPM
OTIS GEN-3
4000 lbs,
350 FPM
D
COAT
CL
COAT

WALK-IN
CL.
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2' - 3 5/16"

BUILIDNG
233' - 9 5/8" 4' - 4 11/16"
2' - 6 1/16"

BUILDING
102' - 5 3/4"36' - 4 3/8"
3' - 0 3/4"

BUILDING
232' - 5 1/4" 5' - 0"
3' - 0 11/16"

BUILDING
76' - 10"55' - 5 1/2"
U6U2
U2
U3
U3
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4 U5
U6
U2
U3
U6
U6
U2
U3
U3
U4
U3U2
U6
U4
U2 U2
U4
U9
U24
U3
U5
U1
251
U1
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4 U5
U6
U6
5 U1 U1
U1 U1 U1 U1
U2
U1
U1
U1U1 U1
33 33 32
33 U4
1 U3
U3
U2
U6
U9
U3
U12
U10
U1
U4
U6
U1
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4 U5
U6
U6
U16
U3
U2
U2
U3
U4
U7
U16
U2
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4U5
U6
U6U3
U2
U13
U16
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4U5
U6
U6
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4U5
U6
U6
U3
U3
U14
U4
U2
U4
U3
U7
U17
U18
U17
U17U17
U17 U17 U17 U17
U3
U10
U5
U5
6 6
18-R DN.
@ 6.67" EACH
18-R UP.
@ 6.67" EACH
18-R DN.
@ 6.67" EACH
18-R UP.
@ 6.67" EACH
6 1
1 1
33 33333333
9 4
1 14
1 1
114
11 1
1 1 1 1 411 4
1 1 1 6
1 1

CMU WALL
3-HOUR RATED CONCRETE WALL / COLUMN
AT TYPE I-A CONSTRUCITON FROM P2-3RD FLR
1-HOUR FIRE RATED FIRE BARRIER / OR FIRE

PARTION WALL
2-HOUR FIRE RATED FIRE BARRIER WALL
3-HOUR RATED FIRE WALL / or FIRE BARRIER
2-HOUR FIRE RATED EXTERIOR WOOD BEARING

WALL , PER TYPE III-A CONSTRUCTION FROM
4TH-8TH FLOORS
(1 HOUR FIRE RATING APPLIES TO ALL INTERIOR
BEARING WALLS. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWG

FOR LOCATION)

PLUMBING WALL

EXIT SIGN

LEGEND FLOOR PLAN
#
#
DOOR TAG, SEE SHEET A6-0
WINDOW TAG, SEE SHEET A6-1
STOREFRONT TAG @ 1ST FLR, SEE SHEET A6-2

KEYNOTE TAG

ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL

FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET

FLOOR DRAIN / AREA DRAIN

PLANTER DRAIN

HARDWIRED CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR

WITH BATTERY BACK-UP

HARDWIRED SMOKE DETECTOR WITH BATTERY
BACK-UP. SMOKE DETECTOR SHALL EMIT A
SIGNAL WHEN THE BATTERIES ARE LOW.

CO
S
#

1. 2.

3. FAN / VENTILATION

ENERGY STAR COMPLIANT

DUCTED TO TERMINATE TO THE OUTSIDE

OF THE BUILDING

CONTROL BY HUMIDITY CONTRLOER
F
X
X-BD
X0X
XXXX

UNIT TYPE (SEE UNIT PLAN SHEET)

NUMBER OF BEDROOMS

UNIT NUMBER

UNIT AREA (MEASURED TO CENTER OF

DEMISING/CORRIDOR WALLS)
TYPICAL:
5'-0" TURN AROUND AND

MAEUVERING CLEAR SPACE

CLASS-I STANDPIPE
#
N
1/8" = 1'-0"
5TH FLOOR
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

URBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:

REVISIONS:

SUBMITTAL:

JOB NUMBER:

THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN ARE THE COPYRIGHTED WORK OF URBAN

DESIGN SPECIALISTS AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED

WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
820 N. CENTRAL AVENUE
GLENDALE, CA 91203
-
10/6/2025 10:54:00 AM

CENTRAL LOFTS
A3-5
5TH FLOOR
PLAN
105-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING
607 of 918

UP DN
UP
DN
F.E.C.

F.E.C.

FD
OD
FD
SCO
SS
S S
SCO
SCO
S
S
SCO
S
S
SCO
SCO
S
SCO
S S
S CO
S
S CO
S
S CO
S
S
S CO
S
S
SCO
S
S
S CO
S
S
SCO
S
S
SCO
S
S
S CO
S
S
SCO
S
SSSS
SS
S
S
S
FD
PD
F.E.C.

A5-3
D
PL.
1,028 SF
K
2-BD
615
718 SF
L
1-BD
614
1,106 SF
2-BD
611
969 SF
D.4
2-BD
602
972 SF
B
2-BD
603
1,007 SF
C.2
2-BD
604
1,025 SF
A
2-BD
601
1,115 SF
G.1
2-BD
612
747 SF
1-BD
613
1,127 SF
G
2-BD
610
1,112 SF
2-BD
609
1,123 SF
2-BD
608
1,130 SF
2-BD
607
1,114 SF
2-BD
606
641 SF
1-BD
605
A5-1
B
A5-2
C
CLR. SHAFT
19' - 8"
CLR. SHAFT
6' - 11"

WALK-IN
CL.

BATH
BEDRM
KIT.

LIV.

W/D
KIT.

BATH #1
BATH
#2
BDRM
#2
BDRM
#1
LIV.

BEDRM
CL.

W/D
BATH
KIT.

BATH #1 BATH
#2
KIT. DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH
#1
KIT.DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH
#1
BATH
#2
KIT.

DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH #1 BATH
#2
KIT.

DIN.LIV.BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH
#2
KIT. DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#2
WALK-
IN CL.

W/D
BATH #1
BDRM
#1
WALK-IN CL.

BATH #2
KIT.

DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/D
COAT
BATH #1
BDRM
#1
BATH
#2
KIT.

DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#2
WALK-
IN CL.

W/D
BATH #1
BDRM
#1

BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY

BDRM BATH

BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY
TRASH
LOBBY

C O R R I D O R
KIT.

BATH #1
DIN.

WALK-IN CL.

LIV.

BDRM
#1

C O R R I D O R
CL
W/D
WALK-IN CL.

WALK-IN
CL
DIN.

LIV.

KIT.

BALCONY

WALK-IN
CL
BDRM
#2
LIV.

DIN.

LIV.

KIT.

BATH
#1
BATH
#2
BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2
DIN.

LIV DINDIN.

BALCONY
CL
W/D
BDRM
#1
BATH
#2 BATH
#1
W/D
BATH
#2
KIT

COAT COAT
W/D
I.T. ELEC
ELEC
WALK -IN CL.

WALK-IN
CL.

WALK IN CL
GARAGE

VENTILATION

TRASH RM

VENTILATION
CL
DIN
BDRM
#2
CL
W/D
ELEV #1 ELEV #2
WALK-
IN CL
BDRM
#3
CL
5 1/2"
UNIT
32' - 4 5/8" 5 1/2"
UNIT
35' - 1 7/8" 8"
UNIT
34' - 3 3/4"

FIRE WALL
1' - 4 1/2"
UNIT
34' - 3 3/4" 8"
UNIT
34' - 8" 8"
UNIT
34' - 8" 8"
UNIT
21' - 0 1/2" 5 1/2"
5 1/2"
UNIT
30' - 1 5/8"8"
UNIT
38' - 4 1/4"5 1/2"
UNIT
31' - 3 7/8"5 1/2"
5 1/2"
UNIT
38' - 6 5/8" 8"
UNIT
28' - 10 1/2" 5 1/2"
UNIT
34' - 4 3/4"

FIRE WALL
1' - 4 1/2"
UNIT
34' - 3 3/4" 8"
UNIT
34' - 8" 8"
UNIT
26' - 4 3/8" 9 1/8"
UNIT
29' - 3" 5 1/2"
5 1/2"
UNIT
34' - 0 1/2" 8"
UNIT
40' - 8 3/4" 5 1/2"
STAIR #2
STAIR #1

CL BALCONY
N. CENTRAL AVE

ARDEN AVE
5 13/16"

BUILDING
235' - 7 1/8" 4' - 4 11/16"
OTIS GEN-3
4000 lbs,
350 FPM
OTIS GEN-3
4000 lbs,
350 FPM

1.04%
2% MAX
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%

BUILDING
2' - 7 1/16"102' - 4 3/4"36' - 4 3/8"
3' - 0 3/4"

BUILDING
232' - 5 1/4" 5' - 0"
1' - 7 5/16"

BUILDING
78' - 3 3/8"55' - 5 1/2"
U6U2
U2
U3
U3
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4 U5
U6
U6
U2
U3
U3
U4
U2 U2
U4
U9
U24
U3
U1U1
U1
U1 U1 U1
U1
5 U5
1 U2
U2
U3
U3
U4 U5
U6
U6U2
U1
U1
U1U1 U1
U3
U3
U2
U2
U9
U3
U4
33 33 32
33 1
U1
25 U4
U1
U1
U6
U16
U3
U2
U2
U3
U4
U7
U16
U2
U3
U6
U4
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4 U5
U6
U6
U2
33 U2
U2
U3
U3
U4U5
U6
U6
U9
U3U2
U6
U4
U3
U2
U13
U16
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4U5
U6
U6
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4U5
U6
U6
U3
U3
U14
U4
U2
U4
U3
U7
U17
U18
U18
U17
U17U17
U17 U17 U17 U17
U3
U10
U5
U5
U15
COAT
BATH
#2
6 6
18-R DN.
@ 6.67" EACH
18-R UP.
@ 6.67" EACH
18-R DN.
@ 6.67" EACH
18-R UP.
@ 6.67" EACH
3 61 11 1
63 1
33333333
4 1
14 1
1 4 11
11 1
1 1 1 1 411 4
1 1

CMU WALL
3-HOUR RATED CONCRETE WALL / COLUMN
AT TYPE I-A CONSTRUCITON FROM P2-3RD FLR
1-HOUR FIRE RATED FIRE BARRIER / OR FIRE

PARTION WALL
2-HOUR FIRE RATED FIRE BARRIER WALL
3-HOUR RATED FIRE WALL / or FIRE BARRIER
2-HOUR FIRE RATED EXTERIOR WOOD BEARING

WALL , PER TYPE III-A CONSTRUCTION FROM
4TH-8TH FLOORS
(1 HOUR FIRE RATING APPLIES TO ALL INTERIOR
BEARING WALLS. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWG

FOR LOCATION)

PLUMBING WALL

EXIT SIGN

LEGEND FLOOR PLAN
#
#
DOOR TAG, SEE SHEET A6-0
WINDOW TAG, SEE SHEET A6-1
STOREFRONT TAG @ 1ST FLR, SEE SHEET A6-2

KEYNOTE TAG

ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL

FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET

FLOOR DRAIN / AREA DRAIN

PLANTER DRAIN

HARDWIRED CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR

WITH BATTERY BACK-UP

HARDWIRED SMOKE DETECTOR WITH BATTERY
BACK-UP. SMOKE DETECTOR SHALL EMIT A
SIGNAL WHEN THE BATTERIES ARE LOW.

CO
S
#

1. 2.

3. FAN / VENTILATION

ENERGY STAR COMPLIANT

DUCTED TO TERMINATE TO THE OUTSIDE

OF THE BUILDING

CONTROL BY HUMIDITY CONTRLOER
F
X
X-BD
X0X
XXXX

UNIT TYPE (SEE UNIT PLAN SHEET)

NUMBER OF BEDROOMS

UNIT NUMBER

UNIT AREA (MEASURED TO CENTER OF

DEMISING/CORRIDOR WALLS)
TYPICAL:
5'-0" TURN AROUND AND

MAEUVERING CLEAR SPACE

CLASS-I STANDPIPE
#
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

URBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:

REVISIONS:

SUBMITTAL:

JOB NUMBER:

THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN ARE THE COPYRIGHTED WORK OF URBAN

DESIGN SPECIALISTS AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED

WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
820 N. CENTRAL AVENUE
GLENDALE, CA 91203
-
10/6/2025 10:27:40 AM

CENTRAL LOFTS
A3-6
6TH FLOOR
PLAN
105-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING
N
1/8" = 1'-0"
6TH FLOOR
608 of 918

UP DN
UP
DN
F.E.C.

F.E.C.

FD
OD
FD
SCO
SS
S S
SCO
SCO
S
S
SCO
S
S
SCO
SCO
S
SCO
S S
S CO
S
S CO
S
S CO
S
S
S CO
S
S
SCO
S
S
S CO
S
S
SCO
S
S
SCO
S
S
S CO
S
S
SCO
S
SSSS
SS
S
S
S
FD
PD
F.E.C.

A5-3
D
1,028 SF
K
2-BD
715
718 SF
1-BD
714
1,106 SF
2-BD
711
969 SF
D.4
2-BD
702
972 SF
2-BD
703
1,007 SF
C.2
2-BD
704
1,025 SF
2-BD
701
1,115 SF
G.1
2-BD
712
747 SF
1-BD
713
1,127 SF
G
2-BD
710
1,112 SF
2-BD
709
1,123 SF
2-BD
708
1,130 SF
P
2-BD
707
1,114 SF
2-BD
706
641 SF
1-BD
705
PL.

A5-1
B
A5-2
C
5 1/2"
UNIT
32' - 4 5/8" 5 1/2"
UNIT
35' - 1 7/8" 8"
UNIT
34' - 3 3/4"

FIRE WALL
1' - 4 1/2"
UNIT
34' - 3 3/4" 8"
UNIT
34' - 8" 8"
UNIT
26' - 4 3/8" 9 1/8"
UNIT
29' - 3" 5 1/2"
5 1/2"
UNIT
34' - 0 1/2" 8"
UNIT
40' - 8 3/4" 5 1/2"
N. CENTRAL AVE

ARDEN AVE
6 13/16"

BUILIDING
235' - 7 1/4" 4' - 3 9/16"
3' - 0 11/16"

BUILDING
76' - 10"55' - 5 1/2"
10 1/16"

BUILDING
104' - 1 5/8"36' - 4 1/2"
42" MIN.

1.26%
2% MAX
2%
2%
2%

11.87%
≈ 11.87%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
3' - 0 7/8"

BUILDING
232' - 5 1/8" 5' - 0"
U6U2
U2
U3
U3
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4 U5
U6
U2
U3
U6
U6
U2
U3
U3
U4
U2 U2
U4
U9
U24
U3
U1U1
U1
U1
U1 U1U1 U1
5 U5
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4 U5
U6
U6U2
U1
U1
U1
U1
U1
U3
U3
U2
U2
U9
U3
U4
1 U4
U6
U1
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4U5
U6
U6
25 33 32
U2
33 33
1 U1
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4 U5
U6
U6U2
U2
U3
U3
U4U5
U6
U6
U9
U3U2
U6
U4
U3
U2
U13
U16
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4U5
U6
U6
U3
U3
U14
U4
U2
U4
U3
U7
U17 U17
U17 U17 U17
U17U17U17
U18
U18
U3
U16
U3
U2
U2
U3
U4
U7
U16
U10
U5
U5

WALK-IN
CL.

BATH
BEDRM
KIT.

LIV.

W/D
KIT.

BATH #1
BATH
#2
BDRM
#2
BDRM
#1
LIV.

BEDRM
CL.

W/D
BATH
KIT.

BATH #1 BATH
#2
KIT. DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH
#1
KIT.DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH
#1
BATH
#2
KIT.

DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH #1 BATH
#2
KIT.

DIN.LIV.BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH
#2
KIT. DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#2
WALK-
IN CL.

W/D
BATH #1
BDRM
#1
WALK-IN CL.

BATH #2
KIT.

DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/D
COAT
BATH #1
BDRM
#1
BATH
#2
KIT.

DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#2
WALK-
IN CL.

W/D
BATH #1
BDRM
#1

BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY

BDRM BATH

BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY
TRASH
LOBBY

C O R R I D O R
KIT.

BATH #1
DIN.

WALK-IN CL.

LIV.

BDRM
#1

C O R R I D O R
CL
W/D
WALK-IN CL.

WALK-IN
CL
DIN.

LIV.

KIT.

BALCONY

WALK-IN
CL
BDRM
#2
LIV.

DIN.

LIV.

KIT.

BATH
#1
BATH
#2
BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2
DIN.

LIV DINDIN.

BALCONY
CL
W/D
BDRM
#1
BATH
#2 BATH
#1
W/D
BATH
#2
KIT

COAT COAT
W/D
I.T. ELEC
ELEC
WALK -IN CL.

WALK-IN
CL.

WALK IN CL
GARAGE

VENTILATION

TRASH RM

VENTILATION
CL
DIN
BDRM
#2
CL
W/D
ELEV #1 ELEV #2
WALK-
IN CL
BDRM
#3
CL

CL BALCONY
OTIS GEN-3
4000 lbs,
350 FPM
OTIS GEN-3
4000 lbs,
350 FPM
COAT
BATH
#2
66 18-R DN.
@ 6.67" EACH
18-R UP.
@ 6.67" EACH
18-R DN.
@ 6.67" EACH
18-R UP.
@ 6.67" EACH
STAIR #2
STAIR #1
33 633333333
1 11 6 1
1 4
1 14
1 1
4 11
11 1
1 1 1 1 411 4
1 1

CMU WALL
3-HOUR RATED CONCRETE WALL / COLUMN
AT TYPE I-A CONSTRUCITON FROM P2-3RD FLR
1-HOUR FIRE RATED FIRE BARRIER / OR FIRE

PARTION WALL
2-HOUR FIRE RATED FIRE BARRIER WALL
3-HOUR RATED FIRE WALL / or FIRE BARRIER
2-HOUR FIRE RATED EXTERIOR WOOD BEARING

WALL , PER TYPE III-A CONSTRUCTION FROM
4TH-8TH FLOORS
(1 HOUR FIRE RATING APPLIES TO ALL INTERIOR
BEARING WALLS. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWG

FOR LOCATION)

PLUMBING WALL

EXIT SIGN

LEGEND FLOOR PLAN
#
#
DOOR TAG, SEE SHEET A6-0
WINDOW TAG, SEE SHEET A6-1
STOREFRONT TAG @ 1ST FLR, SEE SHEET A6-2

KEYNOTE TAG

ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL

FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET

FLOOR DRAIN / AREA DRAIN

PLANTER DRAIN

HARDWIRED CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR

WITH BATTERY BACK-UP

HARDWIRED SMOKE DETECTOR WITH BATTERY
BACK-UP. SMOKE DETECTOR SHALL EMIT A
SIGNAL WHEN THE BATTERIES ARE LOW.

CO
S
#

1. 2.

3. FAN / VENTILATION

ENERGY STAR COMPLIANT

DUCTED TO TERMINATE TO THE OUTSIDE

OF THE BUILDING

CONTROL BY HUMIDITY CONTRLOER
F
X
X-BD
X0X
XXXX

UNIT TYPE (SEE UNIT PLAN SHEET)

NUMBER OF BEDROOMS

UNIT NUMBER

UNIT AREA (MEASURED TO CENTER OF

DEMISING/CORRIDOR WALLS)
TYPICAL:
5'-0" TURN AROUND AND

MAEUVERING CLEAR SPACE

CLASS-I STANDPIPE
#
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

URBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:

REVISIONS:

SUBMITTAL:

JOB NUMBER:

THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN ARE THE COPYRIGHTED WORK OF URBAN

DESIGN SPECIALISTS AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED

WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
820 N. CENTRAL AVENUE
GLENDALE, CA 91203
-
10/6/2025 10:27:41 AM

CENTRAL LOFTS
A3-7
7TH FLOOR
PLAN
105-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING
N
1/8" = 1'-0"
7TH FLOOR
609 of 918

DN
DN
F.E.C.

F.E.C.

FD
FD
FDFD
UP
UP
OD
ODOD
PD
PD
PD
PD
PD
PD
PD

PD PD PD PD PD
PD
PD
SCO
SS
S S
SCO
SCO
S
S
SCO
S
S
SCO
SCO
S
SCO
S S
S CO
S
S CO
S
S CO
S
S
S CO
S
S
SCO
S
S
S CO
S
S
SCO
S
S
SCO
S
S
S CO
S
S
SCO
S
SSSS
SS
S
S
S
FD
PD
F.E.C.

A5-3
D
982 SF
P.2
1-BD+DEN
807
1,014 SF
N.1
1-BD+DEN
809
1,007 SF
H.2
1-BD+DEN
811
579 SF
J.2
STUDIO
813
987 SF
K.2
2-BD
815
718 SF
L
1-BD
814
1,049 SF
N.3
1-BD+DEN
812
1,061 SF
N
1-BD+DEN
810
1,058 SF
N.2
1-BD+DEN
808
1,048 SF
N.1
1-BD+DEN
806
902 SF
D.3
1-BD+DEN
802
642 SF
E
1-BD
805
878 SF
C.3
2-BD
804
706 SF
Q
1-BD
803
685 SF
M
1-BD
801
PL.

N. CENTRAL AVE

ARDEN AVE
A5-1
B
A5-2
C
5 1/2"
UNIT
26' - 2 7/8" 8"
UNIT
34' - 11 1/2" 8"
UNIT
34' - 2 5/8" 1' - 6 3/4"
UNIT
34' - 2 5/8" 8"
UNIT
34' - 8" 8"
UNIT
34' - 8" 8"
UNIT
21' - 0 1/2" 5 1/2"
5 1/2"
UNIT
26' - 1 1/4" 8"
UNIT
27' - 10 3/4" 8"
UNIT
28' - 10 5/8" 5 1/2" 4' - 0 13/16"
5 1/2"
UNIT
38' - 1 1/4"8"
UNIT
34' - 0 1/2"5 1/2"
5 1/2"
UNIT
32' - 5 3/8" 8"
UNIT
28' - 11 5/16" 5 1/2"
UNIT
34' - 2 13/16"

FIRE WALL
1' - 6 3/4"
UNIT
34' - 2 5/8" 8"
UNIT
34' - 8" 8"
UNIT
26' - 4 3/8" 9 1/8"
UNIT
29' - 3" 5 1/2"
10' - 0" 10' - 0"

NO ROOF PENETRATION NO ROOF PENETRATION
10' - 0" 10' - 0"

DIM TO WALL FINISH

NO ROOF PENETRATION NO ROOF PENETRATION
F.D. F.D.METAL ROOF
3/8" / 12
SLOPE
O.D. O.D.

TERRACE
5' - 2 1/2"
6 13/16"

BUILDING
236' - 5 1/8" 3' - 5 11/16"
10 1/16"

BUILDING
104' - 7 1/4"35' - 10 7/8"
BATH
KIT.

LIV.

KIT.

BATH #1
BATH
#2
BDRM
#2
BDRM
#1
LIV.

BEDRM
CL.

W/D
BATH
KIT.

BATH #1 BATH #2
KIT.

DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#1

W/DCOAT
BATH
#1
KIT.DIN.LIV.

BDRM
#1

W/DCOAT
BATH
#1
BATH
#2
KIT. DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#1

W/DCOAT
BATH #1 BATH
#2
KIT.DIN.

LIV.BDRM
#1

W/DCOAT
BATH
#2
KIT. DIN.

LIV.

W/D
BATH #1
BDRM
#1
WALK-IN CL.

BATH #2
KIT.DIN.

LIV.

W/D
COAT
BATH #1
BDRM
#1
BATH
#2
KIT.DIN.

LIV.

W/D
BATH #1
BDRM
#1

BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY

BDRM BATH

BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY
TRASH
LOBBY

C O R R I D O R
KIT.

BATH #1
DIN.

WALK-IN CL.

LIV.

BDRM
#1

C O R R I D O R
CL
W/D
WALK-IN CL.

WALK-IN
CL
DIN.

LIV.

KIT.

BALCONY
CL
BDRM
#2
LIV.

DIN.

LIV.

KIT.

BATH
#1
BDRM
#1
DIN.

LIV DIN
DIN.

CL
W/D
BDRM
#1
BATH
#2
BATH
#1
W/D
BATH
#2
KIT

COAT COAT
W/D
I.T. ELEC
ELEC
WALK -IN CL.

WALK-IN
CL.

WALK IN CL
GARAGE

VENTILATION

TRASH RM

VENTILATION
CL
DIN
DEN
W/D
ELEV #1 ELEV #2
WALK-
IN CL

BALCONY
OTIS GEN-3
4000 lbs,
350 FPM
OTIS GEN-3
4000 lbs,
350 FPM

CL DEN DEN DEN DEN
W/D

SLEEPING

DENDENDEN

BALCONYBALCONY

C O R R I D O R
BATH #1
MIN. FROM PL.
40"

0.76%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%2%
2%
2%
2%
2%

1.14%
2%
1' - 7 5/16"

BUILDING
78' - 3 3/8"55' - 5 1/2"
24" MIN.
33" CLR.

CL
U1
U1U1U1U1
25 U1
U1
1 5
U1
U1U1 U1
33 U3U2
U2
U4
U3
U4
U13
U13
32 33
33 U3
U3
U5U4
U2
U2
U3
U3
U2
U7
U3
U4
U1
U9
U3
U2
U3
U4
U7
U1
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4U5
U2U2
U3
U3
U4 U5
U2U2
U3
U3
U4U5
U2
U2
U3
U3
U4 U5
U2
U3
U4
U2
U2
U3
U3
U2
U3
U4 U5
U2
1 U1
U9
U2 U2 U2U2
U2 U2
U3
U9
U3
U3
U14
U4
U2
U4
U3
U7
U2
U3
U3
U4U5
U2
U2
U1
U17
U18
U18
U21
U12
U10
U5
U4
U2
U22U22U22
U22
U3
U19
U19
U20 U20U20U20
3 U19
U19 U20 U20 U19 U19 U20 U18 U18W/D
BDRM
LIV.

DIN.

CL
66 18-R DN.
@ 6.67" EACH
19-R UP.
@ 6.94" EACH
18-R DN.
@ 6.67" EACH
19-R UP.
@ 6.94" EACH
STAIR #2
STAIR #1
DEPTH
24"
6 6 1
3 3 8
33333
4 3
1 1
1 1

CMU WALL
3-HOUR RATED CONCRETE WALL / COLUMN
AT TYPE I-A CONSTRUCITON FROM P2-3RD FLR
1-HOUR FIRE RATED FIRE BARRIER / OR FIRE

PARTION WALL
2-HOUR FIRE RATED FIRE BARRIER WALL
3-HOUR RATED FIRE WALL / or FIRE BARRIER
2-HOUR FIRE RATED EXTERIOR WOOD BEARING

WALL , PER TYPE III-A CONSTRUCTION FROM
4TH-8TH FLOORS
(1 HOUR FIRE RATING APPLIES TO ALL INTERIOR
BEARING WALLS. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWG

FOR LOCATION)

PLUMBING WALL

EXIT SIGN

LEGEND FLOOR PLAN
#
#
DOOR TAG, SEE SHEET A6-0
WINDOW TAG, SEE SHEET A6-1
STOREFRONT TAG @ 1ST FLR, SEE SHEET A6-2

KEYNOTE TAG

ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL

FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET

FLOOR DRAIN / AREA DRAIN

PLANTER DRAIN

HARDWIRED CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR

WITH BATTERY BACK-UP

HARDWIRED SMOKE DETECTOR WITH BATTERY
BACK-UP. SMOKE DETECTOR SHALL EMIT A
SIGNAL WHEN THE BATTERIES ARE LOW.

CO
S
#

1. 2.

3. FAN / VENTILATION

ENERGY STAR COMPLIANT

DUCTED TO TERMINATE TO THE OUTSIDE

OF THE BUILDING

CONTROL BY HUMIDITY CONTRLOER
F
X
X-BD
X0X
XXXX

UNIT TYPE (SEE UNIT PLAN SHEET)

NUMBER OF BEDROOMS

UNIT NUMBER

UNIT AREA (MEASURED TO CENTER OF

DEMISING/CORRIDOR WALLS)
TYPICAL:
5'-0" TURN AROUND AND

MAEUVERING CLEAR SPACE

CLASS-I STANDPIPE
#
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

URBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:

REVISIONS:

SUBMITTAL:

JOB NUMBER:

THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN ARE THE COPYRIGHTED WORK OF URBAN

DESIGN SPECIALISTS AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED

WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
820 N. CENTRAL AVENUE
GLENDALE, CA 91203
-
10/6/2025 10:27:42 AM

CENTRAL LOFTS
A3-8
8TH FLOOR
PLAN
105-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING
N
1/8" = 1'-0"
8TH FLOOR
610 of 918

DN
DN
A5-3
D
STAIR #2
STAIR #1
PL.

A5-1
B
ELEVATORS 1, 2

CANOPYCANOPYCANOPYCANOPY

CANOPY CANOPY CANOPY CANOPY

CANOPYCANOPY
CANOPY
42" TALL METAL GUARD RAIL
CANOPY
42" TALL METAL GUARD RAIL
42" TALL METAL GUARD RAIL42" TALL METAL GUARD RAIL42" TALL METAL GUARD RAIL CANOPY
42" TALL METAL GUARD RAIL
A5-2
C

3.13% MIN.

3.13%

3.13%3.13%

3.13% 3.13%

3.13%

3.13% 3.13%

3.13%

FIRE WALL , BELOW
4' - 0"

FIRE WALL
1' - 6 3/4"
4' - 0"

TERMINATES TO UNDERSIDE OF COMBUSTIBLE ROOF SHEATHING
•
•
•

NO ROOF OPENING

FIRE RETARDANT WOOD
MIN. CLASS B

WATER HEATER PAD

BALCONY BELOW

TERRACE BELOW
N. CENTRAL AVE

ARDEN AVE
8' - 5 13/16"

BUILDING
226' - 1 7/8" 5' - 9 15/16"
5' - 9 15/16"

BUILDING
74' - 0 3/4"55' - 5 1/2"
2' - 7 9/16"

BUILDING
86' - 8 7/8"51' - 11 3/4"

BALCONY BELOW BALCONY BELOW BALCONY BELOW
9' - 4 1/8"

BUILDING
226' - 1 7/8" 5' - 0"
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

URBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:

REVISIONS:

SUBMITTAL:

JOB NUMBER:

THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN ARE THE COPYRIGHTED WORK OF URBAN

DESIGN SPECIALISTS AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED

WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
820 N. CENTRAL AVENUE
GLENDALE, CA 91203
-
8/29/2025 5:35:03 PM

CENTRAL LOFTS
A3-9

ROOF PLAN
105-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING
N
1/8" = 1'-0"
ROOF
611 of 918

4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

URBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:

REVISIONS:

SUBMITTAL:

JOB NUMBER:

THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN ARE THE COPYRIGHTED WORK OF URBAN

DESIGN SPECIALISTSAND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED

WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
820 N. CENTRAL AVENUE
GLENDALE, CA 91203
-
12/19/2023 2:52:48 PM
A4-0

MASSING

ANALYSIS
105-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING

ROOFLINE MODULATION

FACADE MODULATION

CORNER FEATURES SHALL BE LOCATED

AT THE INTERSECTION OF TWO PUBLIC
RIGHT-OF-WAY. CORNER FEATURES

SHALL HAVE A DISTINCT BUT

COMLIMENTARY DESIGN FROM THE

OVERALL MASS OF THE BUILDING
612 of 918

1ST FLOOR
560.50
2ND FLOOR
575.00
3RD FLOOR
585.00
4TH FLOOR
595.50
5TH FLOOR
605.50
6TH FLOOR
615.50
7TH FLOOR
625.50
8TH FLOOR
635.50
ROOF
645.50
TOTOA AREA OF FACADE, AT ARDEN AVENUE = 20,350 S/F
TOTOA AREA OF STUCCO = 4,225 S/F < 12,210 S/F
20,350 X 0.60= 12,210 S/F
12' - 0" 77' - 0"
7' - 8"63' - 10"9' - 10"36' - 9"116' - 5"
40' - 7"

STUCCOSTUCCO
1ST FLOOR
560.50
2ND FLOOR
575.00
3RD FLOOR
585.00
4TH FLOOR
595.50
5TH FLOOR
605.50
6TH FLOOR
615.50
7TH FLOOR
625.50
8TH FLOOR
635.50
ROOF
645.50
TOTOA AREA OF FACADE, AT CENTRAL AVENUE =8,970 S/F
TOTOA AREA OF STUCCO = 1,658 S/F < 12,210 S/F
8,970 X 0.60= 5,382 S/F
STUCCO
10' - 6" 78' - 6"
32' - 9" 23' - 2" 31' - 6" 15' - 3"
42' - 6"
10' - 6" 78' - 6"
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS
©COPYRIGHT 2020
SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:

REVISIONS:

SUBMITTAL:

JOB NUMBER:

THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN ARE THE COPYRIGHTED WORK OF URBAN

DESIGN SPECIALISTSAND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED

WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
820 N. CENTRAL AVENUE
GLENDALE, CA 91203
-
7/19/2024 10:25:45 AM
A4-0.1
STUCCO
AREA

CALCULATION
105-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING
3/32" = 1'-0"

NORTH ELEVATION -ARDEN AVE
3/32" = 1'-0"

WEST ELEVATION-CENTRAL AVE
613 of 918

614 of 918

615 of 918

616 of 918

617 of 918

1ST FLOOR
560.39
1ST FLOOR
560.39
2ND FLOOR
574.89
2ND FLOOR
574.89
3RD FLOOR
584.89
3RD FLOOR
584.89
4TH FLOOR
595.39
4TH FLOOR
595.39
5TH FLOOR
605.39
5TH FLOOR
605.39
P1- GARAGE
548.89
P1- GARAGE
548.89
6TH FLOOR
615.39
6TH FLOOR
615.39
7TH FLOOR
625.39
7TH FLOOR
625.39
8TH FLOOR
635.39
8TH FLOOR
635.39
P2- GARAGE
539.39
P2- GARAGE
539.39
27 ROOF
645.39
ROOF
645.39
1 43 11 1514 18 20 22 23 265 8 13 16
PIT
5' - 6"
PL.(N.)
PL.(E.)
PL.(E.)
10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 6"10' - 0"14' - 6"11' - 6"9' - 6" TWO GEN-3 EDGE
4000 LBS
350 FPM ELEVATORS
MIN.
13' - 7"
STAIR #1 STAIR #2
21 42" MIN

LOBBY / LEASING
MACH. RM

TRASH / REC RM
ELEC. RM

P A R K I N G

P A R K I N GP A R K I N G

P A R K I N G

DRIVE WAY

CORR U N I T U N I TC O R R I D O R C O R R I D O R

F I R E W A L L FIRE BARRIER

EXIT PASSAGEWAY

P A R K I N G
MIN.
41"

GAS METER RM
2 25
( sheathing)

LOWEST GRADE
+560.26

BUILDING HEIGHT, PER ZONING CODE
95' - 0"
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

URBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:

REVISIONS:

SUBMITTAL:

JOB NUMBER:

THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN ARE THE COPYRIGHTED WORK OF URBAN

DESIGN SPECIALISTS AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED

WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
820 N. CENTRAL AVENUE
GLENDALE, CA 91203
-
8/29/2025 5:14:59 PM

CENTRAL LOFTS
A5-1

SECTION-B
105-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING
1/8" = 1'-0"

SECTION-B
618 of 918

1ST FLOOR
560.39
2ND FLOOR
574.89
3RD FLOOR
584.89
4TH FLOOR
595.39
5TH FLOOR
605.39
P1- GARAGE
548.89
6TH FLOOR
615.39
7TH FLOOR
625.39
8TH FLOOR
635.39
P2- GARAGE
539.39
AW
ROOF
645.39
BNX C
PL.(N.)
PL.(E.)
PL.

PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
9' - 0 1/4"
2' - 0"
10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 6"10' - 0"14' - 6"11' - 6"9' - 6" GEN-3 EDGE
4000 LBS
350 FPM ELEVATORS
ELEV #2
STAIR #1
ELEV. LOBBY

ELEV LOBBY
PIT
5' - 6"
GARAGE VENTILATION SHAFT, FOR P1 & P2
MIN
42"
MIN
42"
GARAGE VENTILATION SHAFT , FOR 1ST LEVEL

REC ROOM

P A R K I N G

P A R K I N G D R I V E W A Y

D R I V E W A Y

STORAGE

STORAGE
GYM

LOBBYPARKING

U N I T

U N I T
MIN.
42"
BALC
BALC
BALC
BALC
BALC
BALC
BALC

CORRIDOR

CORRIDOR
UV S

LOWEST GRADE
+560.26
MAX.
95' - 0"
PR
CLR.
7' - 7 3/4"
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

URBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:

REVISIONS:

SUBMITTAL:

JOB NUMBER:

THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN ARE THE COPYRIGHTED WORK OF URBAN

DESIGN SPECIALISTS AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED

WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
820 N. CENTRAL AVENUE
GLENDALE, CA 91203
-
8/29/2025 5:15:00 PM

CENTRAL LOFTS
A5-2

SECTION-C
105-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING
3/16" = 1'-0"

SECTION-C
619 of 918

Tectonic Copyright 2007
1ST FLOOR
560.39
2ND FLOOR
574.89
3RD FLOOR
584.89
4TH FLOOR
595.39
5TH FLOOR
605.39
P1- GARAGE
548.89
6TH FLOOR
615.39
7TH FLOOR
625.39
8TH FLOOR
635.39
P2- GARAGE
539.39
W

POOL DECK

U N I T
10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 6"10' - 0"14' - 6"11' - 6"9' - 6"

U N I T

U N I T
STAIR #2
PL.

PL.(E)
PL.(N)

U N I T

U N I T
(565.0)
(566.0)

STORAGE STORAGE

ARDEN AVE

D R I V E W A Y P A R K I N G

P A R K I N G

U N I T

U N I T U N I T
ROOF
645.39
DQX

POOL FENCE
5' - 0"
1-STORY

BLDG HOTLE'S

COURTYARD
13-STORY HOTEL

T JKL E
TRENCH
DRAIN
15%

7.5%

STORAGE

BIKE PARKING

STORAGE

D R I V E W A Y P A R K I N G

7.5%
V

PERFORATED , ROLL DOWN ,

STEEL GARAGE GATE
F

LOWEST GRADE
+560.26

BUILDING HEIGHT, PER ZONING CODE
95' - 0"
C.3R
MIN. CLR.
8' - 2"
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

URBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:

REVISIONS:

SUBMITTAL:

JOB NUMBER:

THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN ARE THE COPYRIGHTED WORK OF URBAN

DESIGN SPECIALISTS AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED

WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
820 N. CENTRAL AVENUE
GLENDALE, CA 91203
-
8/29/2025 5:15:02 PM

CENTRAL LOFTS
A5-3

SECTION-D
105-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING
1/8" = 1'-0"

SECTION-D
620 of 918

1ST FLOOR
560.39
2ND FLOOR
574.89
3RD FLOOR
584.89
4TH FLOOR
595.39
5TH FLOOR
605.39
P1- GARAGE
548.89
6TH FLOOR
615.39
7TH FLOOR
625.39
8TH FLOOR
635.39
P2- GARAGE
539.39
W
ROOF
645.39

DQX JK E

WOMENMEN

STORAGE
MECH
MECH
PL.(E)
PL.(N)
PL.

GARAGE VENTILATION SHAFT , FOR P1 & P2 LEVELS

STORAGE STORAGE

D R I V E W A Y P A R K I N G

P A R K I N G

D R I V E W A Y P A R K I N G

D R I V E W A Y P A R K I N G
10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 0"10' - 6"10' - 0"14' - 6"11' - 6"9' - 6" 2% SLOPE
2% SLOPE
F C.3R
13' - 6 1/4"
8' - 6 11/16"
565.25
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

URBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:

REVISIONS:

SUBMITTAL:

JOB NUMBER:

THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN ARE THE COPYRIGHTED WORK OF URBAN

DESIGN SPECIALISTS AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED

WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
820 N. CENTRAL AVENUE
GLENDALE, CA 91203
-
8/29/2025 5:15:03 PM

CENTRAL LOFTS
A5-4

SECTION-E
105-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING
3/16" = 1'-0"

SECTION-E
621 of 918

4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

URBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:

REVISIONS:

SUBMITTAL:

JOB NUMBER:

THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN ARE THE COPYRIGHTED WORK OF URBAN

DESIGN SPECIALISTS AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED

WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
820 N. CENTRAL AVENUE
GLENDALE, CA 91203
-
10/6/2025 9:44:48 AM

CENTRAL LOFTS
A6-0
DOOR

SCHEDULE
105-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING

D O O R S C H E D U L E
NO. Width Height Type
Mark Thick. Core Fire Rating Frame Material Glass
Threshol
d Finish Panic Hardware Manuf. Location Comments
1 3' - 0" 7' - 0" A 1-3/4" H/M 90 MIN. METAL - YES PAINT YES - EXIT DOOR ( P2-8TH FLOOR ) SLEF-CLOSING / SMOKE GASKETED 2 3' - 0" 7' - 0" A 1-3/4" H/M 60 MIN. METAL TEMPERED YES EXTERIOR GRADE PAINT YES - EXIT DOOR @ 1ST FLOOR SLEF-CLOSING / SMOKE GASKETED 3 6' - 0" 8' - 0" E -- -- None ALUM / GLASS - YES ANODIZED YES ARCADIA INC BUILDING ENTRANCE @ CENTRAL AVE SLEF-CLOSING / MAGNETIC LOCK/ CARD READER 4 6' - 0" 8' - 0" B Per Manuf. H/M 90 MIN. METAL - -- PAINT YES - DOOR AT FIRE BARRIER, 2ND & 3RD FLRS SELF-CLOSING / , SMOKE GASKETED, ELECTRICAL HOLD OPEN, 5 6' - 0" 8' - 0" B Per Manuf. H/M 180 MIN. METAL - -- PAINT YES - DOOR AT FIRE WALL , FROM 4TH-8TH FLRS SELF-CLOSING / , SMOKE GASKETED, ELECTRICAL HOLD OPEN, 6 4' - 0" 7' - 0" H -- -- 90 MIN. METAL - YES Per manuf. -- Door Systems, or Smoke Guard ELEVATORS # 1 & 2, FROM 2ND TO 8TH FLOORS ROLL DOWN ELEVATOR SMOKE DOOR. NOTE : ELEVATOR DOOR MUST BE 90 MIN.FIRE RATED 7 6' - 0" 8' - 0" B 1 3/4" H/M 60 MIN. METAL - YES PAINT YES - GARAGE-LOBBY @ 1ST FLOOR SELF-CLOSING / , SMOKE GASKETE 8 3' - 0" 7' - 0" A 1-3/4" H/M 90 MIN. METAL - YES EXTERIOR GRADE PAINT YES - EXIT DOOR @ ROOF SELF-CLOSING 9 6' - 0" 8' - 0" E -- -- None ALUM / GLASS TEMPERED -- ANODIZED - ARCADIA INC GYM - REC ROOM SELF-CLOSING 10 3' - 6" 8' - 0" A 1-3/4" H/M None METAL - - PAINT - - MAIL ROOM SLEF-CLOSING 11 6' - 0" 8' - 0" B 1 3/4" H/M 60 MIN. METAL - YES PAINT - - ELECTRICAL ROOM - 12 6' - 0" 7' - 0" B 1 3/4" H/M 60 MIN. METAL - YES EXTERIOR GRADE PAINT - - ELECTRICAL ROOM EXTERIOR GRADE FINISH 13 6' - 0" 7' - 0" B 1 3/4" H/M 180 MIN. METAL - YES EXTERIOR GRADE PAINT - - TRANSFORMER ROOM EXTERIOR GRADE FINISH, HARDWARE PER GWP 14 10' - 0" 7' - 0" J -- -- None METAL - - Per manuf. - - GARAGE ROLL-UP DOOR GRILLE STYLE 15 3' - 0" 6' - 0" G -- -- None W. IRON - -- EXTERIOR GRADE PAINT YES - POOL DECK EXIT GATE @ 1ST FLOOR SECURITY LOCK / SELF-CLOSING / KEY FOB ACCESS 16 3' - 0" 6' - 0" G -- -- None W. IRON - -- EXTERIOR GRADE PAINT YES - GAS METER ROOM SECURITY LOCK / SELF-CLOSING / ACCESS & HARDWARE PER GAS COMPANY 17 6' - 0" 7' - 0" B 1 3/4" -- None METAL - - PAINT YES - STORAGE P2-1ST FLOORS SECURITY LOCK / SELF-CLOSING / KEY FOB ACCESS 18 3' - 0" 7' - 0" V -- -- None METAL - - PAINT - - SELF STORE GATES SECURITY LOCK 19 3' - 6" 7' - 0" A 1-3/4" H/M None METAL - YES PAINT -- - POOL RM. SELF CLOSING /SECURITY LOCK 20 6' - 0" 8' - 0" B 1 3/4" H/M None METAL - YES PAINT YES - MECHANICAL ROOM - PUMP ROOM @ 1ST

FLOOR SECURITY LOCK / SELF-CLOSING /
21 3' - 0" 7' - 0" A 1-3/4" H/M None METAL - YES PANT YES - MECHANICAL ROOM P1-P2 SECURITY LOCK / SELF-CLOSING / 22 3' - 0" 7' - 0" A 1-3/4" H/M None METAL - YES PAINT YES - STORAGE - P2 SECURITY LOCK / SELF-CLOSING / KEY FOB ACCESS 23 3' - 0" 7' - 0" C -- -- 20 MIN. ALUM / GLASS TEMPERED YES ANODIZED - ARCADIA INC ELEV LOBBY P1-P2 SLEF-CLOSING / SMOKE GASKETED 24 3' - 0" 7' - 0" A 1-3/4" H/M None METAL - YES PANT YES - STORAGE P2-P1 LEVELS SECURITY LOCK / SELF-CLOSING / KEY FOB ACCESS 25 3' - 0" 7' - 0" A 1-3/4" H/M 20 MIN. METAL - YES PANT YES - TRASH LOBBY 2ND-8TH FLOORS SELF-CLOSING / SMOKE GASKETE 26 8' - 0" 7' - 0" B 1 3/4" H/M 90 MIN. METAL - YES PANT - - TRASH ROOM - P1 LEVEL SMOKE GASKETE 27 3' - 0" 7' - 0" A 1-3/4" H/M None METAL - YES PANT - - GYM STORAGE SELF CLOSING /SECURITY LOCK 28 3' - 0" 8' - 0" A 1-3/4" H/M 90 MIN. METAL - YES PAINT YES - EXIT DOOR ( 1ST FLOOR ) SLEF-CLOSING / SMOKE GASKETED 29 3' - 0" 8' - 0" A 1-3/4" H/M None METAL - YES PAINT - - PUBLIC RESTROOMS AT 1ST FLOOR SECURITY LOCK / SELF-CLOSING 30 3' - 0" 7' - 0" A 1-3/4" H/M None METAL - YES PAINT - - PUBLIC RESTROOMS AT 2ND FLOOR SECURITY LOCK / SELF-CLOSING 31 6' - 0" 8' - 0" E -- -- None ALUM / GLASS TEMPERED YES ANODIZED YES ARCADIA INC POOL DECK EXIT TO CORRIDOR SELF CLOSING 32 4' - 0" 7' - 0" B 1 3/4" H/M None METAL - - PANT - - ELEC . / I.T. CLOSET LOCK PER OPERATOR 33 5' - 0" 7' - 0" B 1 3/4" H/M None METAL - - PAINT - - ELEC . / I.T. CLOSET LOCK PER OPERATOR 34 3' - 0" 7' - 0" A 1 3/4" H/M None METAL - - PANT - - ELEC . / I.T. CLOSET LOCK PER OPERATOR 35 4' - 0" 5' - 0" D -- -- None ALUM / GLASS TEMPERED - ANODIZED YES PER LANDSCAPE POOL FENCE AT 3RD FLOOR CARD READER ACCESS, SELF CLOSING, ADDITIONAL COMMENTS PER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 36 3' - 0" 7' - 0" C -- -- None ALUM / GLASS TEMPERED YES ANODIZED - ARCADIA INC ROOM @ 1ST FLOOR CARD READER ACCESS, SELF CLOSING, 37 6' - 0" 7' - 5 3/4" E -- -- None ALUM / GLASS TEMPERED YES ANODIZED - ARCADIA INC CARD READER ACCESS, SELF CLOSING, 38 3' - 0" 7' - 0" A 1-3/4" H/M 60 MIN. METAL - YES PANT YES - MACH ROOM P2 SECURITY LOCK / SELF-CLOSING

U N I T D O O R S C H E D U L E
NO. Width Height Type
Mark Thick. Core Fire Rating Frame Material Glass Threshold Finish Manuf. Location Comments U1 3' - 6" 7' - 0" A 1-3/4" S/C 20 MIN. WOOD - YES PAINT - UNIT ENTRY SLEF-CLOSING / SMOKE GASKETED / EXIT DOOR. PROVIDE DOOR BUZZER, BELL, CHIME, OR EQUIVALENT MOUNTED A MAXIMUM OF 48 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR AND CONNECTED TO PERMANENT WIRING. A MINIMUM STC RATING OF 30 (

INLCLUDING DOOR AND SEALS) PER ACOUSTIC REPORT
U2 2' - 10" 6' - 8" A 1-3/4" H/C None WOOD - - PAINT - BEDROOM PRIVACY LOCK U3 2' - 10" 6' - 8" A 1-3/4" H/C None WOOD - - PAINT - BATHROOM PRIVACY LOCK. UNDER CUT CONDITION FOR RETURN AI ( PER HVAC DESIGN) U4 2' - 8" 6' - 8" K 1-3/4" H/C None WOOD - - PAINT - WASHER / DRYER LOUVERED DOOR U5 2' - 8" 6' - 8" A 1-3/4" H/C None WOOD - - PAINT - COAT CLOSET - U6 2' - 10" 6' - 8" A 1-3/4" H/C None WOOD - - PAINT - WALK-IN CLOSET - U7 6' - 0" 6' - 8" M 1-3/4" H/C None WOOD - - PAINT - CLOSET - U9 5' - 0" 6' - 8" M 1 3/4" H/C None WOOD - - PAINT - CLOSET - U10 5' - 0" 6' - 8" L 1 3/4" H/C None WOOD TEMPERED - MIRROR , PAINT - COAT CLOSET MIRROR FINISH ON BOTH PANES U11 4' - 0" 6' - 8" L 1 3/4" H/C None WOOD TEMPERED - MIRROR , PAINT - COAT CLOSET MIRROR FINISH ON BOTH PANES U12 2' - 6" 6' - 8" B 1-3/4" H/C None WOOD - - PAINT - COAT CLOSET - U13 5' - 0" 6' - 8" B 1 3/4" H/C None WOOD - - PAINT - CLOSET - U14 5' - 8" 6' - 8" B 1 3/4" H/C None WOOD - - PAINT - CLOSET - U15 2' - 3" 6' - 8" A 1-3/4" H/C None WOOD - - PAINT - COAT CLOSET - U16 4' - 0" 6' - 8" B 1 3/4" H/C None WOOD - - PAINT - CLOSET - U17 9' - 0" 8' - 0" P -- -- None ALUM / GLASS TEMPERED YES ANODIZED ARCADIA INC UNIT BALCONY / PATIO SECURITY LOCK / CRANK HANDLE CASMENT WINDOW /FIXED METAL SCREEN FOR WINDOW U18 12' - 0" 8' - 0" Q -- -- None ALUM / GLASS TEMPERED YES ANODIZED ARCADIA INC UNIT BALCONY / PATIO SECURITY LOCK U19 7' - 9" 8' - 0" R -- -- None ALUM / GLASS TEMPERED YES ANODIZED ARCADIA INC UNIT BALCONY / PATIO SECURITY LOCK U20 4' - 10" 8' - 0" S -- -- None ALUM / GLASS TEMPERED YES ANODIZED ARCADIA INC UNIT BALCONY / PATIO SECURITY LOCK U21 12' - 0" 8' - 0" T -- -- None ALUM / GLASS TEMPERED YES ANODIZED ARCADIA INC UNIT BALCONY / PATIO SECURITY LOCK / ADD TWO SEPARATE SLIDING METAL SCREEN DOOR ON THE OUTSIDE OF SLIDERS U22 5' - 6" 8' - 0" N -- -- None ALUM / GLASS TEMPERED YES ANODIZED ARCADIA INC UNIT BALCONY / PATIO SECURITY LOCK / ADD A SEPARATE SLIDING METAL SCREEN DOOR ON THE OUTSIDE OF SLIDER U23 3' - 0" 3' - 6" U -- -- None ALUM / GLASS TEMPERED -- ANODIZED CRL UNIT PATIO SECURITY LOCK U24 8' - 0" 6' - 8" W 1 3/4" H/C None WOOD - -- PAINT - CLOSET - U25 <varies> 6' - 8" F -- -- None ALUM / GLASS TEMPERED YES ANODIZED - SHOWER MOUNT TOWEL BAR ON SWING SHOWER DOOR 622 of 918

A B C E
J K
F.F.

D O O R T Y P E S
D
H L M

SWING DOOR SWING DOUBLE DOORS SWING GLASS DOOR
34" - 44"
NOTE : LEVER HARDWARE (TYP.) ON ALL SWING DOORS
F.F.

PER SCHEDULE

PER SCHEDULE PER SCHEDULE
T

KICK PLATE
10"
T
34" - 44"

KICK PLATE
10"

PER SCHEDULE

PER SCHEDULE
34" - 44"
10" PER SCHEDULE

PER SCHEDULE
T T
34" - 44"
T
34" - 44"

F SWING SHOWER GLASS DOOR G WROUGHT IRON GATE

PER SCHEDULE
34" - 44"
ELEV. ROLL DOWN SMOKE

DOOR ROLLING GRILLE GATE

PER SCHEDULE

PER PLAN

SIDELITE

PER SCHEDULE

PER PLAN

SIDELITE

PER SCHEDULE

SWING GLASS DOOR
34" - 44"

PER SCHEDULE

SWING DOOR (LOUVERED)

PER SCHEDULE

SWING DOUBLE DOORS
(MIRROR FINISH)

MIRRORMIRROR
34" - 44"

PER SCHEDULE

PER SCHEDULE
10"

SLIDING DOUBLE DOORS
TT
T

SLIDING GLASS DOOR,

WITH SIDELITE
N

PER SCHEDULE

OPERABLEFIXED
2" 3' - 3" 2"
34" - 44"

PER SCHEDULE

PER SCHEDULE
DOOR
3' - 0"

SWING GLASS DOOR, WITH

SIDELITE & CASEMENT WNDW
P
2" 3' - 3" 2"
WNDW
EQ EQ
Q
F.F.

SWING DOUBLE GLASS DOOR,

WITH SIDELITES

PER SCHEDULE

PER SCHEDULE
DOOR
3' - 0"
DOOR
3' - 0"
2" 3' - 3" 2"
34" - 44"
TT
T
T
T
TTT
T
T

PER SCHEDULE

PER SCHEDULE
2" 3' - 3" 2"
DOOR
3' - 0"
DOOR
3' - 0"

R SWING DOUBLE GLASS DOOR,

WITH A SIDELITE
T
T T T

S SWING GLASS DOOR, WITH A

SIDELITE
T
T
T
34" - 44"
2" 3' - 2" 2"
34" - 44"
3' - 0"

PER SCHEDULE

PER SHCEDULE
T
T
T
T
T
T T

SLIDING DOUBLE GLASS

DOOR, WITH SIDELITES
8' - 0"

PER SCHEDULE
3' - 0" 3' - 0"
34" - 44"
METAL
SCREEN
METAL
SCREEN
METAL
SCREEN

PER SCHEDULE

GLASS SWING GATE U

SWING DOUBLE GLASS DOOR

PER SCHEDULE

CHAIN LINK GATEV
34" - 44"

W SLIDING TRIPPLE DOORS
34"-44"

PER SCHEDULE

PER SCHEDULE
MAX.
3' - 4"

TOWEL BAR
MAX
6"

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8.

9. 10.

MAXIMUM EFFORT TO OPERATE DOORS MUST NOT EXCEED 8.5
POUNDS FOR EXTERIOR DOORS AND 5 POUNDS INTERIOR
DOORS. THIS MAXIMUM EFFORT IS MEASURED AS THE

AMOUNT OF PUSH OR PULL APPLIED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO

HINGED DOORS, AND AT THE CENTER PLANE OF SLIDING OR
FOLDING DOORS. COMPENSATING DEVICES OR AUTOMATIC
DOOR OPENERS MAY BE USED TO MEET THESE STANDARDS.

WHEN FIRE DOORS ARE REQUIRED, THE MAXIMUM EFFORT TO
OPERATE THE DOORS MAY BE INCREASED UP TO 15 POUNDS.

ALL FIRE-RATED DOORS SHALL HAVE SMOKE GASKETS.

ALL ACCESSIBLE DOORS TO ROOMS SHALL BE A MINIMUM 34"
WIDE WHEN FULLY OPENED.

THE EXIT DOOR MUST OPEN OVER A LANDING NOT MORE THAN
1/2" BELOW THE THRESHOLD.

GLASS DOORS, ADJACENT PANELS AND ALL GLAZED
OPENINGS WITHIN 18" OF THE FLOOR SHALL BE OF GLASS
APPROVED FOR IMPACT HAZARD, I.E. TEMPERED GLASS.

EXIT DOORS SHALL BE OPENABLE FROM THE INSIDE WITHOUT
THE USE OF A KEY, SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE, OR EFFORT.

FLUSH BOLTS OR SURFACE BOLTS ARE PROHIBITED ON EXIT
DOORS.

PROVIDE PANIC HARDWARE FOR ALL DOORS WITH OCCUPANT
LOAD 50 OR MORE.

HAND ACTIVATED DOOR OPENING HARDWARE IS TO BE
BETWEEN 34 & 44 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR. LATCHING AND

LOCKING DOORS THAT ARE HAND ACTIVATED AND IN A PATH

OF TRAVEL SHALL HAVE LEVER TYPE HARDWARE, PANIC BARS,

PUSH-PULL ACTIVATING BARS, OR OTHER HARDWARE THAT
PROVIDES PASSAGE WITHOUT GRASPING THE HARDWARE.

EXIT DOOR HARDWARE SHALL BE AN APPROVED TYPE TESTED

IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEDURES ESTABLISHED BY
CALIFORNIA STATE FIRE MARSHALL STANDARDS 33.2.

NOTES
GLAZED OPENINGS WITHIN 24" OF THE DOOR LOCK WHEN DOOR

IS IN THE CLOSED POSITION SHALL BE FULLY TEMPERED GLASS OR APPROVED BURGLARY-RESISTANT MATERIAL.

THE BOTTOM 10 INCHES OF ALL DOORS, EXCEPT AUTOMATIC

AND SLIDING DOORS, MUST HAVE A SMOOTH, UNINTERRUPTED

SURFACE TO ALLOW THE DOOR TO BE OPENED BY A

WHEELCHAIR FOOTREST WITHOUT CATCHING ON OR TRAPPING
THE FOOTREST.

EVERY ENTRANCE OR PASSAGE DOORWAY SHALL BE OF A SIZE
TO PERMIT THE INSTALLATION OF A DOOR NOT LESS THAN 3
FEET IN WIDTH. DOORS SHALL BE CAPABLE OF OPENING AT
LEAST 90 DEGREES AND SHALL BE SO MOUNTED THAT THE
CLEAR WIDTH OF THE DOORWAY IS NOT LESS THAN 32 INCHES.

PROVIDE PANIC HARDWARE FOR ALL DOORS WITH OCCUPANT
LOAD 50 OR MORE.

ALL HARDWARE SHALL BE LEVER HARDWARE MEETING DAS
REQUIREMENTS.

REFER TO SHEET A1-4-A1-7 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES.

PROVIDE SAFETY GLAZING IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS,
A. GLAZING IN INEGRESS AND EGRESS DOORS;
B. GLAZING IN FIXED OR OPERABLE PANELS ADJACENT TO A

DOOR WHERE THE NEAREST EXPOSED EDGE OF THE GLAZING IS
WITHIN 2 FEET ARC OF EITHER VERTICAL EDGE OF A CLOSED

DOOR AND WHERE THE BOTTOM EXPOSED EDGE OF THE
GLAZING IS LESS THAN 18" FEET ABOVE THE WALKING SURFACE.

DOORS OPENING INTO ONE-HOUR FIRE RESISTIVE CORRIDOR

SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH A SMOKE OR DRAFT-STOP FIRE
ASSEMBLY HAVING A MINIMUM 20 MINUTE RATING.

ALL DOORS WITH MAGNETIC HOLD DOWNS (HOM) ARE TO BE
CONNECTED WITH THE SMOKE AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS.

REFER TO INTERIOR DESIGNER DRAWINGS, FOR INTERIOR
DOORS

11. 12.

13. 14.

15. 16.

17. 18.

19. 20.

NOTES FOR GLAZING AT AMENITY SPACES
•
•
•
•

CLEAR VISION GLAZING

DUAL PANE

LOW REFLECTIVITY- LOW E INSULATED

SPANDREL TO MATCH COLOR
SOLARBAN 90(2)CLEAR+CLEAR GLASS INSULATING GLASS UNIT
VLT
51%

EXTERIOR

REFLLECTANCE
12%

INTERIOR

REFLLECTANCE
19%

U-VALUE IMPERIAL
(WINTER)

AIR ARGON

0.29 0.24
SHGC

0.23 LSG

2.22 4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

URBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:

REVISIONS:

SUBMITTAL:

JOB NUMBER:

THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN ARE THE COPYRIGHTED WORK OF URBAN

DESIGN SPECIALISTS AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED

WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
820 N. CENTRAL AVENUE
GLENDALE, CA 91203
-
10/6/2025 9:44:50 AM

CENTRAL LOFTS
A6-01

DOOR TYPES
105-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING
623 of 918

NOTES FOR GLAZING AT UNITS
SOLARBAN R100(2)CLEAR+CLEAR GLASS INSULATING GLASS UNIT VLT
42%

EXTERIOR

REFLLECTANCE
32%

INTERIOR

REFLLECTANCE
14%

U-VALUE IMPERIAL
(WINTER)

AIR ARGON

0.29 0.25
SHGC

0.23 LSG

1.83 •
•
•
•

CLEAR VISION GLAZING

DUAL PANE

LOW REFLECTIVITY- LOW E INSULATED

SAPNDREL TO MATCH COLOR

T TEMPERED GLASS
LEGEND
• PROVIDE SAFETY GLAZING IN FIXED OR OPERABLE PANELS ADJACENT TO A DOOR WHERE THE NEAREST EXPOSED EDGE OF THE GLAZING IS WITHIN A 2-FOOT ARC OF

EITHER A VERTICAL EDGE OF A CLOSED DOOR AND WHERE THE BOTTOM EXPOSED EDGE OF THE GLAZING IS LESS THAN 18" ABOVE THE WALKING SURFACE.

ADDITIONAL NOTES

1. 2.

REFER TO BUILDING ELEVATIONS ( SHEETS A4-1
A4-5) FOR LOCATION OF OPERABLE & FIXED

WINDOWS
REFER TO DOOR TYPES (SHEET A6-0 & A6-01, FOR

ADDITIONAL WINDOWS )
T
T
A B C
3' - 6"
F.F.

PER SCHEDULE3' - 6"
W I N D O W / S T O R E F R O N T T Y P E S F R O M 2 N D - 8 T H F L O O R S 3' - 6"
G.1

CASEMENT & FIXED
F.F.
3' - 6" T
G
CASEMENT & FIXED CASEMENT & FIXED C.1 CASEMENT & FIXED D CASEMENT & FIXED D.1 CASEMENT & FIXED E CASEMENT & FIXED E.1 CASEMENT & FIXED F FIXED F.1 FIXED 3' - 6"
3' - 6"

PER SCHEDULE
METAL
SCREEN
METAL
SCREEN
T T
TTTT
TT

TTTTTT TT
T
T
T
TT
T
T
T
T
T
T
TTT
T
METAL
SCREEN
METAL
SCREEN
METAL
SCREEN
METAL
SCREEN
METAL
SCREEN
METAL

SCREEN METAL
SCREEN
METAL
SCREEN
METAL
SCREEN
METAL
SCREEN
METAL
SCREEN

CASEMENT & FIXED CASEMENT & FIXED
METAL
SCREEN
METAL
SCREEN
METAL
SCREEN
PER SCHEDULE1' - 6"
PER SCHEDULE1' - 6"
PER SCHEDULE1' - 6"
PER SCHEDULE1' - 6"
T T T
TTT

T T T TT
T
TT
TTT

H CASEMENT
METAL
SCREEN
PER SCHEDULE3' - 6"

PER SCHEDULE
METAL
SCREEN
EQ EQ

PER SCHEDULE
PER SCHEDULE3' - 6"

EQ EQ EQ

PER SCHEDULE

EQ EQ EQ EQ

PER SCHEDULE

EQ EQ EQ

PER SCHEDULE PER SCHEDULE

EQ EQ EQ

PER SCHEDULE

EQ EQ EQ EQ

PER SCHEDULE

EQ EQ EQ EQ
3' - 6"
T
T
T
T

PER SCHEDULE

PER SCHEDULE PER SCHEDULE

PER SCHEDULE

PER SCHEDULE
3' - 6"
3' - 6"

EQ EQ EQ EQ EQ EQ EQ EQ EQ EQ EQ EQ

PER SCHEDULE
PER SCHEDULE1' - 6"
3' - 6"

PER SCHEDULE
PER SCHEDULE3' - 6"

EQ EQ EQ EQ
METAL
SCREEN
METAL

SCREENT T T T T

J CASEMENT & FIXED
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

URBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:

REVISIONS:

SUBMITTAL:

JOB NUMBER:

THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN ARE THE COPYRIGHTED WORK OF URBAN

DESIGN SPECIALISTS AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED

WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
820 N. CENTRAL AVENUE
GLENDALE, CA 91203
-
10/6/2025 10:39:44 AM

CENTRAL LOFTS
A6-1

WINDW &

STOREFRONT

SCHEDULE
2ND-8TH FLR.
105-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING
S T O R E F R O N T & W I N D O W S C H E D U L E (2ND-8TH FLOORS) WT Width Height Type
Mark
Frame
Material Glass Operation Finish Manufacturer/Model Location Comments 1 5' - 6" 8' - 0" C ALUMINUM Dual glazing Operable & Fixed ANODIZED Arcadia Inc./ Storefront AFG601T Series (Thermal) / Casement window T200 Series ( Thermal) EAST, NORTH, WEST & SOUTH ELEVATIONS SECURITY LOCK,METAL SCREEN & CRANK HANDLE @ OPERABLE WINDOW 2 5' - 6" 6' - 6" C.1 ALUMINUM Dual glazing Operable & Fixed ANODIZED Arcadia Inc./ Storefront AFG601T Series (Thermal) / Casement window T200 Series ( Thermal) NORTH, WEST & SOUTH ELEVATIONS SECURITY LOCK,METAL SCREEN & CRANK HANDLE @ OPERABLE WINDOW 3 5' - 6" 4' - 6" A ALUMINUM Dual glazing Operable & Fixed ANODIZED Arcadia Inc./ Storefront AFG601T Series (Thermal) / Casement window T200 Series ( Thermal) EAST, NORTH, WEST & SOUTH ELEVATIONS SECURITY LOCK,METAL SCREEN & CRANK HANDLE @ OPERABLE WINDOW 4 8' - 3" 8' - 0" D ALUMINUM Dual glazing Operable & Fixed ANODIZED Arcadia Inc./ Storefront AFG601T Series (Thermal) / Casement window T200 Series ( Thermal) NORTH & WEST ELEVATIONS SECURITY LOCK,METAL SCREEN & CRANK HANDLE @ OPERABLE WINDOW 5 8' - 3" 6' - 6" D.1 ALUMINUM Dual glazing Operable & Fixed ANODIZED Arcadia Inc./ Storefront AFG601T Series (Thermal) / Casement window T200 Series ( Thermal) NORTH & WEST ELEVATIONS SECURITY LOCK,METAL SCREEN & CRANK HANDLE @ OPERABLE WINDOW 6 11' - 0" 8' - 0" E ALUMINUM Dual glazing Operable & Fixed ANODIZED Arcadia Inc./ Storefront AFG601T Series (Thermal) / Casement window T200 Series ( Thermal) NORHT & SOUTH ELEVATIONS SECURITY LOCK,METAL SCREEN & CRANK HANDLE @ OPERABLE WINDOW 7 11' - 0" 6' - 6" E.1 ALUMINUM Dual glazing Operable & Fixed ANODIZED Arcadia Inc./ Storefront AFG601T Series (Thermal) / Casement window T200 Series ( Thermal) NORTH ELEVATION SECURITY LOCK,METAL SCREEN & CRANK HANDLE @ OPERABLE WINDOW 8 8' - 3" 4' - 6" B ALUMINUM Dual glazing Operable & Fixed ANODIZED Arcadia Inc./ Storefront AFG601T Series (Thermal) / Casement window T200 Series ( Thermal) NORTH ELEVATION SECURITY LOCK,METAL SCREEN & CRANK HANDLE @ OPERABLE WINDOW 9 16' - 6" 8' - 0" G ALUMINUM Dual glazing Operable & Fixed ANODIZED Arcadia Inc./ Storefront AFG601T Series (Thermal) / Casement window T200 Series ( Thermal) WEST ELEVATION SECURITY LOCK,METAL SCREEN & CRANK HANDLE @ OPERABLE WINDOW 10 16' - 6" 6' - 6" G.1 ALUMINUM Dual glazing Operable & Fixed ANODIZED Arcadia Inc./ Storefront AFG601T Series (Thermal) / Casement window T200 Series ( Thermal) WEST ELEVATION SECURITY LOCK,METAL SCREEN & CRANK HANDLE @ OPERABLE WINDOW 11 2' - 0" 8' - 0" F ALUMINUM Dual glazing Fixed ANODIZED Arcadia Inc./ Storefront AFG601T Series (Thermal) SOUTH ELEVATION - 12 2' - 0" 6' - 6" F.1 ALUMINUM Dual glazing Fixed ANODIZED Arcadia Inc./ Storefront AFG601T Series (Thermal) SOUTH ELEVATION - 13 11' - 0" 4' - 6" J ALUMINUM Dual glazing Operable & Fixed ANODIZED Arcadia Inc./ Storefront AFG601T Series (Thermal) / Casement window T200 Series ( Thermal) SOUTH ELEVATION SECURITY LOCK,METAL SCREEN & CRANK HANDLE @ OPERABLE WINDOW 14 3' - 0" 4' - 6" H ALUMINUM Dual glazing Operable ANODIZED Arcadia Inc./ Casement window T200 Series ( Thermal) SIDE ELEVATION -5 SECURITY LOCK,METAL SCREEN & CRANK HANDLE @ OPERABLE WINDOW 624 of 918

1ST FLOOR
560.39

T T T T T T
2" 3' - 9 3/8" 2" 3' - 9 3/8" 2" 3' - 9 3/8" 2" 3' - 9 3/8" 2" 3' - 9 3/8" 2" 3' - 9 3/8" 2" 23' - 10 1/8"
2"1' - 6"
2"
1' - 0"
2"
7' - 10"2"
1ST FLOOR
560.39
3 T T
T T
T T
T T
T
2"1' - 6"
2"
1' - 0"2"8' - 0"
2" 6' - 0" 2" 3' - 8 11/16" 2" 3' - 8 11/16" 2" 3' - 8 11/16" 2" 18' - 0"
2" 1' - 6"
2"
1' - 0"2"7' - 10"2"
1ST FLOOR
560.39

T T T T
TTTT
2" 1' - 6"
2"
1' - 0"2"7' - 3 3/4"
2"
6 1/4"
2" 4' - 0 1/2" 2" 4' - 0 1/2" 2" 4' - 0 1/2" 2" 4' - 0 1/2" 2" 8' - 0"
1ST FLOOR
560.39

T T T T
TTTT
2"1' - 6"
2"
1' - 0"2"7' - 3 3/4"2"6 1/4"
8' - 0"
2" 4' - 0 1/2" 2" 4' - 0 1/2" 2" 4' - 0 1/2" 2" 4' - 0 1/2" 2" 17' - 0"
1ST FLOOR
560.39

T T T T T T
TTTTTT
2"4' - 2"2"4' - 2"2"4' - 2"2"4' - 2"2"4' - 2"2"4' - 2"2" 26' - 2"
2"1' - 6"
2"
1' - 0"2"7' - 3 3/4"2"6 1/4"
8' - 0"
1ST FLOOR
560.39
T
T T
T T
T T T
T T
T
2"1' - 6"
2"
1' - 0"
2"
7' - 3 3/4"2"6 1/4"
2"3' - 9"2"3' - 9 1/4"2"6' - 0"2"3' - 9 1/4"2"3' - 9 1/4"2"3' - 9 1/4"2" 26' - 0"
8' - 0"
1ST FLOOR
560.39
T
T T
T T
T
T
T
T
T T
T T
T T
T
2" 7' - 10"
2"
1' - 0"
2"
1' - 6" 2"
2"3' - 11 1/4"2"3' - 11 1/4"2"3' - 11 1/4"2"3' - 11 1/4"2"3' - 11 1/4"2"3' - 11 1/4"2"3' - 11 1/4"2"3' - 11 1/4"2" 33' - 0"
11' - 0"
1ST FLOOR
560.39

T T T T T T

T T T T T T
2" 7' - 10" 2" 1' - 0"
2"
1' - 6" 2"
11' - 0"
2"3' - 11 11/16"2"3' - 11 11/16"2"3' - 11 11/16"2"3' - 11 11/16"2"3' - 11 11/16"2"3' - 11 11/16"2" 25' - 0"
1ST FLOOR
560.39
T
T
T
3' - 6" 7' - 6"
2" 2' - 6" 2" 2' - 6" 2"
2" 3' - 3" 2" 3' - 9" 2"
5' - 6"
1ST FLOOR
560.39
T
T
T
T
T
3' - 6" 2" 3' - 3" 2" 3' - 9" 2"
2" 3' - 5 9/16" 2" 3' - 6 9/16" 2" 3' - 5 9/16" 2"
11' - 0"
11' - 1 5/8"
1ST FLOOR
560.39
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
3' - 6" 7' - 6"
2" 3' - 3" 2" 3' - 9" 2"
2" 3' - 6" 2" 3' - 7" 2" 3' - 7" 2" 3' - 7" 2" 3' - 7" 2" 3' - 6" 2" 22' - 6 1/8"
1ST FLOOR
560.39
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
3' - 6" 2" 3' - 3" 2" 3' - 9" 2"
T T
T
+564.58 7' - 0"
2" 4' - 2" 2"
2" EQ 2" EQ 2" 3' - 0" 2"
36 PROVIDE SAFETY GLAZING IN FIXED OR OPERABLE PANELS ADJACENT TO A DOOR WHERE THE NEAREST EXPOSED EDGE OF THE GLAZING IS WITHIN A 2-FOOT ARC OF

EITHER A VERTICAL EDGE OF A CLOSED DOOR AND WHERE THE BOTTOM EXPOSED EDGE OF THE GLAZING IS LESS THAN 18" ABOVE THE WALKING SURFACE.

T TEMPERED GLASS
DOOR TAG, SEE SHEET A6-0

NOTES FOR GLAZING AT AMENITY SPACES
•
•
•
•

CLEAR VISION GLAZING

DUAL PANE

LOW REFLECTIVITY- LOW E INSULATED

SAPNDREL TO MATCH COLOR
SOLARBAN 90(2)CLEAR+CLEAR GLASS INSULATING GLASS UNIT
VLT
51%

EXTERIOR

REFLLECTANCE
12%

INTERIOR

REFLLECTANCE
19%

U-VALUE IMPERIAL
(WINTER)

AIR ARGON

0.29 0.24
SHGC

0.23 LSG

2.22 LEGEND
#
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

URBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:

REVISIONS:

SUBMITTAL:

JOB NUMBER:

THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN ARE THE COPYRIGHTED WORK OF URBAN

DESIGN SPECIALISTS AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED

WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
820 N. CENTRAL AVENUE
GLENDALE, CA 91203
-
10/6/2025 9:44:54 AM

CENTRAL LOFTS
A6-2

STOREFRONT

SCHEDULE
1ST FLR.
105-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING

TYPE - A TYPE - B TYPE - C

TYPE - D TYPE - E TYPE - F

TYPE - G TYPE - H TYPE - J TYPE - K

TYPE - L TYPE - M TYPE - N
625 of 918

4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS
©COPYRIGHT 2020
DATE:

REVISIONS:

SUBMITTAL:

JOB NUMBER:

THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN ARE THE COPYRIGHTED WORK OF URBAN

DESIGN SPECIALISTSAND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED

WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
820 N. CENTRAL AVENUE
GLENDALE, CA 91203
-
SHEET NUMBER:

A6-0
12/6/2023 4:15:53 PM
SHEET TITLE:

SITE CONTEXT

VIEW - SOUTH
105-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING
626 of 918

4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS
©COPYRIGHT 2020
DATE:

REVISIONS:

SUBMITTAL:

JOB NUMBER:

THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN ARE THE COPYRIGHTED WORK OF URBAN

DESIGN SPECIALISTSAND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED

WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
820 N. CENTRAL AVENUE
GLENDALE, CA 91203
-
SHEET TITLE:

SITE VIEW

FROM TOP
SHEET NUMBER:

A6-1
1/12/2024 12:40:12 PM
105-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING
627 of 918

628 of 918

TBD631PD
TBD643PD

OUTSIDE
INSIDE
Setting Block [ 1" x5_
8" x 4" ]
SB_1.0000X0.6250X4
TBD632PD
TBD635PD
TB630ST

OUTSIDE
INSIDE
VTLTG
TBD631PD
TBD643PD

OUTSIDE
INSIDE
Setting Block [ 1" x5_
8" x 4" ]
SB_1.0000X0.6250X4
TBD632PD
TBD635PD
TB630ST

OUTSIDE
INSIDE
VTLTG
TBD631PD
TBD643PD

OUTSIDE
INSIDE
Setting Block [ 1" x5_
8" x 4" ]
SB_1.0000X0.6250X4
TBD632PD
TBD635PD
TB630ST

OUTSIDE
INSIDE
VTLTG
3/8 " FOREVER COAT

GLASS GUARD RAIL
SLOPE

PLASTER REVEAL
22 GA. GALVANIZED

SHEET METAL FLASHING
LAP S.A.F. OVER S.A.F.

RAILING SYSTEM
(ALUM CRAFT LTD.)

RAIL ATTACHMENT

PER STRUCTURAL PLANS
METAL FASCIA, PRIMED & PAINTED.

SEE MATERIAL FINISH PACKAGE.

PROVIDE 1" WEEPHOLES AT BOTTOM
OF FASCIA.

FINISH FLOOR
2" 1"
4" MAX

EXTERIOR PLASTER O/ LATH

WEEP HOLES

BENT PLATE PER

PAPER-BACKED

RIB LATH

STRUCTURAL DWGS
V.I.F.

PER PLAN
42" MIN.
1 1/2" 1 1/2"
MAX
4"
MAX
4" 1 1/2"
3/8" SOUND MAT
1 1/2" LIGHTWEIGHT

CONCRETE

FINISH FLOOR

INTERIOREXTERIOR
ARCADIA AFG 601 (T)
/ OR AFG 451 T ( PER OPENING

DIMENSION AND STRUCUTRAL

REQUIRMENT)

SILL PAN FLASHING
MIN.
3"

METAL CLADDING, ALUCOBOND

PLUS OR SIMILAR

DRY WALL , BEYOND

FIRE-RETARDANT-TREATED LUMBER

AT EXTERIOR WALLS, PER TYPE III-A
CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS.

TWO LAYERS OF TYPE "X" GYP

SHEATHING

FINISH FLOOR

DRY WALL METAL BEAD

DRYWALL BEAD
3/8" SOUND MAT
1 1/2" LIGHTWEIGHT

CONCRETE

FINISH FLOOR

INTERIOREXTERIOR
ARCADIA AFG 601 (T)
/ OR AFG 451 T ( PER OPENING

DIMENSION AND STRUCUTRAL

REQUIRMENT)

SILL PAN FLASHING

FIBER CEMENT BOARD,

NICHIHA

DRY WALL , BEYOND

FIRE-RETARDANT-TREATED LUMBER

AT EXTERIOR WALLS, PER TYPE III-A
CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS.

TWO LAYERS OF TYPE "X" GYP

SHEATHING

FINISH FLOOR

DRY WALL METAL BEAD

DRYWALL BEAD
3/8" SOUND MAT
1 1/2" LIGHTWEIGHT

CONCRETE

FINISH FLOOR

INTERIOREXTERIOR
ARCADIA AFG 601 (T)
/ OR AFG 451 T ( PER OPENING

DIMENSION AND STRUCUTRAL

REQUIRMENT)

SILL PAN FLASHING
MIN.
3"
3 COAT STUCCO

DRY WALL , BEYOND

FIRE-RETARDANT-TREATED LUMBER

AT EXTERIOR WALLS, PER TYPE III-A
CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS.

ONE LAYERS OF TYPE "X" GYP

SHEATHING

FINISH FLOOR

DRY WALL METAL BEAD

DRYWALL BEAD

STUCCO TRIM , AND DRIP

INTERIOREXTERIOR
3/4" SCRATCH AND BROWN
COAT, SEE 5 / A7-0
1 1/4" - 1 1/2" NATURAL STONE

THIN BRICK OVER BOND COAT,

INSTALLED IN RUNNING BOND

MASONRY WALL

METAL DRIP

STUCCO TRIM

WATERPROOFING
SCALE
3" = 1'-0"
STOREFRONT SILL / HEAD @
METAL CLADDING6
4519 ADMIRALTY WAY, SUITE A, MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 TEL: 310.301-1810 WWW.URBANDESIGNSPECIALISTS.COM

URBAN DESIGN SPECIALISTS
© COPYRIGHT 2020
SHEET NUMBER:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:

REVISIONS:

SUBMITTAL:

JOB NUMBER:

THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN ARE THE COPYRIGHTED WORK OF URBAN

DESIGN SPECIALISTS AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED

WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION
DEVELOPER: VK GROUP
700 N. BRAND BLVD,
SUITE 600
GLENDALE, CA 91203
820 N. CENTRAL AVENUE
GLENDALE, CA 91203
-
10/6/2025 11:53:19 AM

CENTRAL LOFTS
A7-5

EXTERIOR
DETAIL
105-UNIT APARTMENT BUILDING
SCALE
3" = 1'-0"
STOREFRONT SILL / HEAD @

FIBER CEMENT BOARD
7 SCALE
3" = 1'-0"
STOREFRONT SILL / HEAD @
STUCCO
8 SCALE
3" = 1'-0"

DOOR HEAD / JAMB AT MASONRY
WALL
4 SCALE
3" = 1'-0"GLASS RAILING @ BALCONIES9
SCALE
1" = 1'-0"GLASS RAILING ELEVATION5
629 of 918

CENTRAL LOFTS - LIGHTING CONCEPTS 08-15-2025 PAGE 1 LIGHTING DESIGNERS + THEATRE CONSULTANTS

CENTRAL LOFTS

FACADE LIGHTING CONCEPTS
LI-1
630 of 918

CENTRAL LOFTS - LIGHTING CONCEPTS 08-15-2025 PAGE 2 LIGHTING DESIGNERS + THEATRE CONSULTANTS

COLOR MARKUP
WEST

EAST NORTH
SOUTH
LI-2
631 of 918

CENTRAL LOFTS - LIGHTING CONCEPTS 08-15-2025 PAGE 3 LIGHTING DESIGNERS + THEATRE CONSULTANTS

LAYERS OF LIGHT

1. I-BEAM ACCENT THROUGHOUT

THE ARCHITECTURE

2. PERIMETER GLOW AT

SOUTHWEST CORNER

3. RECESSED VERTICAL DIRECT VIEW LINEAR ON

NICHIHA PANELS
1 2
3 LI-3
632 of 918

CENTRAL LOFTS - LIGHTING CONCEPTS 08-15-2025 PAGE 4 LIGHTING DESIGNERS + THEATRE CONSULTANTS LEVEL 1 WALKWAY

2. DECORATIVE LINEAR

WALL SCONCES ON

COLUMNS

3. DISCREET SQUARE SCONCES

AT NORTH ELEVATION

EGRESS DOORS

1. MONOPOINT AT CANOPY FOR GENERAL ILLUMINATION
1 2
3 LI-4```
633 of 918

LANDSCAPE PLANS PREPARED FOR

ARDEN RESIDENCES
820 N. CENTRAL AVE.

GLENDALE, CA 91203
SHEET INDEX:

L-0 COVER SHEET
L-1.0 LANDSCAPE AREA SUMMARY
L-1.1 HARDSCAPE
L-1.2 PLANTING PLAN- GROUND LEVEL
L-1.3 POOL DECK LANDSCAPE
L-1.4 8TH FLOOR LANDSCAPE AND LV LIGHTING
L-1.5 GROUND FLOOR LANDSCAPE IMAGES
L-1.6 PLANTING DETAILS AND NOTES
L-1.7 POOL TERRACE LANDSCAPE IMAGERY
L-1.8 GROUND FLOOR LV LANDSCAPE LIGHTING
L-1.9 POOL DECK LV LANDSCAPE LIGHTING
L-2.0 LANDSCAPE STEMWALLS & SECTIONS/ELEVATIONS
I-1 GROUND FLOOR IRRIGATION PLAN
I-2 POOL DECK & 8TH FLOOR IRRIGATION PLAN
I-3 IRRIGATION NOTES AND MWELO CALCS
I-4 IRRIGATION DETAILS
I-5 IRRIGATION SPECS AND MAINTENANCE

LANDSCAPING COMPLETED PRIOR TO THE FINAL INSPECTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: 4.106.4
A. AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION ARE RESTORED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH NATIVE

VEGETATION SPECIES AND PATTERNS
B. LIMIT TURF AREAS TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE
C. UTILIZE AT LEAST 75% NATIVE CALIFORNIA OR DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANT AND TREE SPECIES APPROPRIATE FOR THE CLIMATE ZONE REGION.

D. HYDROZONING IRRIGATION IRRIGATION TECHNIQUES ARE INCORPORATED INTO THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

1. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL LABOR, EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS AND SERVICES FOR

THE COMPLETE INSTALLATION AS DESCRIBED BY THE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS AND IN THESE SPECIFICATIONS. ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL BE OF THE HIGHEST STANDARDS.

2. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE PLAN OR SPECIFICATIONS IS TO HAVE PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL BY THE OWNER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE.

3. UNTIL ALL WORK IS COMPLETED AND ACCEPTED BY THE OWNER, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME ALL RISK AND BEAR ALL LOSSES TO HIS MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT.

4. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ALL WORK DAMAGED BY HIM OR MAKE PAYMENT TO OWNER FOR SUCH REPAIR. SHOULD THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR HAVE HIS WORK DAMAGED BY

ANOTHER CONTRACTOR, HE IS TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS WITH THE OTHER CONTRACTOR FOR THE REPAIR OR PAYMENT FOR THE REPAIR.

5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIMSELF FAMILIAR WITH ALL UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES, PIPES AND STRUCTURES. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR COST INCURRED DUE TO DAMAGE AND REPLACEMENT OF SAID UTILITIES.

6. ALL WORK AND PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES.

7. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SEVEN ( 7) DAYS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK TO COORDINATE PROJECT OBSERVATION SCHEDULES.

DEMOLITION NOTES

1. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT WILLFULLY PROCEED WITH DEMOLITION AS SHOWN WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS THAT OBSTRUCTIONS AND/OR OBJECTS EXIST THAT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN KNOWN DURING DESIGN. SUCH CONDITIONS AND/OR OBJECTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER.

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL NECESSARY REVISIONS DUE TO FAILURE TO GIVE SUCH NOTIFICATION.

2. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO REPLACE OR RESTORE TO THE ORIGINAL CONDITION ANY EXISTING ITEMS THAT ARE DAMAGED OR DISTURBED IN ANYWAY. ALL MATERIAL TO BE REUSED OR SALVAGED SHALL BE STORED IN AN AREA DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER FOR THAT PURPOSE.

ALL SALVAGED MATERIALS SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE OWNER.

3. ALL MATERIALS SPECIFIED TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE PER CODES AND REGULATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE METHOD OF DISPOSAL WITH OWNER PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. CONTRACTOR TO PAY ALL FEES ASSOCIATED WITH DISPOSAL.

4. REMOVE PLANT MATERIAL WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS OF DEMOLITION AS SHOWN ON PLAN AND AS AUTHORIZED IN THE FIELD BY THE LANDSCAPE DESIGNER.

5. EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE.

WEED REMOVAL

1. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS TO REMOVE ALL WEEDS AND GRASSES (INCLUDING ROOTS) IN THE AREA OF LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION.

2. IF AGREED UPON BY OWNER, ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS TO RECEIVE THE PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE SURFIAN 75W PER MANUFACTURER'S CURRENT PRINTED SPECIFICATIONS. APPLICATION OF HERBICIDE SHALL BE DONE BY PERSONNEL LICENSED TO HANDLE AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS.

GRADING AND SOIL CONDITIONING

1. ALL WALKWAYS AND PAVED AREAS SHALL HAVE SMOOTH AND CONTINUOUS ELEVATION CHANGES.

2. ALL AREAS SHALL HAVE POSITIVE DRAINAGE.

3. ALL PROPOSED GRADES ARE TO MEET AND BLEND IN WITH EXISTING GRADING AT PROJECT LIMIT AND EXISTING SIDEWALK. PRECISE ELEVATIONS INDICATED ON PLANS TO BE VERIFIED IN FIELD TO AS-BUILT CONDITION.

4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR "ROUNDING OFF" ALL SHARP RIDGES EXISTING ON-SITE, WHETHER OR NOT SUCH CONDITIONS ARE INDICATED ON PLANS, AND FOR "FINISH GRADING." FINISH

GRADING SHALL CONSIST OF RAKING ALL AREAS TO A SMOOTH GRADE, CULTIVATING THE SOIL TO A DEPTH OF SIX INCHES (6") AND REMOVING ALL ROCKS OR CLODS OF TWO-INCH (2") DIAMETER OR LARGER.

REMOVAL OF MINOR AMOUNTS OF CONSTRUCTION WASTE IS INCLUDED.

5. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE AN EVEN APPLICATION (PER EACH 1000 SQUARE FEET) OF SIX (6) CUBIC YARDS OF NITROGEN MINERALIZED, STABILIZED WOOD SAWDUST, THIRTY (30) POUNDS OF 6N-20P-20K FERTILIZER AND TEN (10) POUNDS OF SOIL SULPHUR. MATERIAL IS TO BE INCORPORATED UNIFORMLY INTO THE TOP SIX INCHES (6") OF SOIL.

6. FOR PLANTS INDICATED ON PLANT LIST AS "ACID-LOVING," A SPECIAL BACKFILL MIX IS TO BE USED, CONSISTING OF TWO (2) PARTS SITE SOIL, ONE (1) PART FINE SAND, ONE (1) PART PEAT MOSS AND 7-7-7 HIGH ACID IRON PREPLANT FERTILIZER. BACKFILL MIX FOR ALL OTHER CONTAINER PLANTS TO CONSIST OF TWO (2) PARTS SOIL AND ONE (1) PART NITROGEN MINERALIZED FIR BARK. BACKFILL MIXES ARE TO BE MIXED IN SEPARATE STOCKPILES, NOT IN THE PLANTING PIT.

CONSTRUCTION NOTES

1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY COORDINATION WITH SUBCONTRACTORS AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMPLISH ALL CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. ALL PIPING, CONDUIT, SLEEVES, ETC., SHALL BE SET IN PLACE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF CONSTRUCTION ITEMS.

THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES TO BE CONSTRUCTED NOT SPECIFICALLY DIMENSIONED MAY BE DETERMINED BY SCALE. IF CONFLICTS ARISE IN FIELD, CONTACT LANDSCAPE DESIGNER FOR SOLUTION.

2. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE FROM OUTSIDE FACE OF PAVING, WALLS, ETC., UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS.

3. PROVIDE FELT EXPANSION JOINT WITH SEALANT WHERE PAVING ABUTS CURBING, BUILDINGS, COLUMNS, AND STRUCTURES. VERIFY TYPE AND COLOR OF SEALANT WITH LANDSCAPE DESIGNER.

4. ALL CURVED WALLS AND WALKS SHALL HAVE SMOOTH, CONTINUOUS CURVES AS INDICATED ON PLANS.

5. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETINGS ON SITE WITH ALL SUB-CONTRACTORS AND THE LANDSCAPE DESIGNER.

6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 4' BY 4' SAMPLES OF ALL FLATWORK FOR LANDSCAPE DESIGNER'S APPROVAL.

PLANT MATERIALS

1. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FURNISH PLANT MATERIALS THAT ARE FREE OF PESTS OR PLANT DISEASES. THIS INCLUDES PRE-SELECTED OR "TAGGED" MATERIAL.

2. PROVIDE MATCHING SIZES AND FORMS FOR EACH SPECIES OF TREE SPACED EQUALLY IN ROWS AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. ALIGN TREES ACROSS WALKS. ADJUST SPACING AS NECESSARY, SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY LANDSCAPE DESIGNER.

3. PROVIDE MATCHING SIZES AND FORMS FOR ALL HEDGE PLANTINGS. SPACE EQUALLY AS SHOWN.

4. EQUALLY SPACE VINES WHERE PLANTED AGAINST WALLS OR FENCES. SEE DRAWINGS FOR QUANTITY AND APPROXIMATE SPACING.

GENERAL PLANTING NOTES

1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL IMPORT OF SOIL AND/OR AMENDMENTS AS

NECESSARY TO EXECUTE SPECIFIED SOIL PREPARATION AND ACHIEVE FINISH GRADES IN PLANTED AREAS, AS INDICATED ON CIVIL DRAWINGS AND IN SPECIFICATIONS.

2. ALL PLANTS ARE TO HAVE A PLANTING PIT 1 112 TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOTBALL AND EQUAL TO ITS DEPTH. THE PLANT IS TO BE BACKFILLED (AFTER POSITIONING OF PLANT) WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL MIX OR SPECIFIED ACID-LOVING BACK-FILL MIX IF INDICATED ON THE PLANT LIST. PROVIDE A SHALLOW WATERING BASIN FOR EACH PLANT.

3. GROUND COVERS ARE TO BE PLANTED SO THAT AFTER SETTLING, THE CROWN OF THE PLANT IS EVEN WITH FINISH GRADE, ROOTS FULLY COVERED WITH SOIL AND FIRMED.

4. WATERING OF PLANTS IS TO TAKE PLACE IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLANTING.

5. GUYING AND STAKING OF TREES IS TO BE PER DETAILS.

CLEAN UP

1. AT THE COMPLETION OF ALL PLANTING OPERATIONS, CONTRACTOR WILL LEAVE THE PREMISES NEAT AND CLEAN.

2. CONTRACTOR WILL REMOVE ALL SURPLUS MATERIALS, NURSERY TAGS AND WASTE FROM THE SITE.

MAINTENANCE

1. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO MAINTAIN ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS FOR A PERIOD OF NINETY (90) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF COMPLETION, ESTABLISHED BY THE OWNER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE. ALL AREAS ARE TO BE KEPT WELL-WATERED, FREE OF WEEDS, GRASSES AND TRASH DURING THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD.

2. AN APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IS TO BE MADE JUST PRIOR TO THE COMPLETION OF THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD, OR AT THIRTY (30) DAY INTERVALS IF MAINTENANCE PERIOD IS GREATER THAN 30 DAYS.

3. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM OF THE INSTALLATION AREA IS TO BE CHECKED FOR COVERAGE AT EACH WATERING.

MALFUNCTIONS, SUCH AS DIRTY HEADS, ETC., ARE TO BE CORRECTED ON THE SPOT. MORE SERIOUS DEFECTS

ARE TO BE REPORTED IMMEDIATELY TO THE OWNER FOR CORRECTION BY THE SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR, OR

CORRECTED IMMEDIATELY BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IF CONTRACT INCLUDED SPRINKLER INSTALLATION.

4. MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE:

A REGULAR MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED TO: ROUTINE INSPECTIONS: AN

ADJUSTMENT AND REPAIR OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND ITS COMPONENTS, AERATING AND DETACHING TURF AREA; REPLENISHING MULCH : FERTILIZING AREAS: AND REMOVING OBSTRUCTIONS TO EMISSION DEVICES.

5. A MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION

GUARANTEE

1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR WILL GUARANTEE ALL PLANT MATERIALS OF 1-GALLON TO 15-GALLON SIZE FOR A PERIOD OF NINETY (90) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE. ALL BOX-SIZE MATERIAL IS TO BE GUARANTEED FORA PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR FROM THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE.

VICINITY MAP
SHEET
TITLE

PROJECT
TITLE
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
DATE

COVER SHEET
L-0

THIS PLAN DOES NOT COMMUNICATE

CONSTRUCTION MEANS OR METHODS AND

THEREFORE SHALL NOT BE USED FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR MISCONSTRUED AS A
CONSTRUCTION PLAN OR TECHNICAL DOCUMENT.

FINISH ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL

BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE
ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS.

THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN AND NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION.

COVER SHEET
ARDEN

RESIDENCES
820 N. CENTRAL AVE.

GLENDALE, CA 91203

PROJECT SITE
634 of 918

46'-10" 41'-4"
41'-6"
44'-2"
44'-7"
20'-0" 20'-0" 20'-0"
15'-6"
20'-0"
20'-0"
17'-4"20'-0"
UP
DN
DN
DN
UP

TRANSFORMER

ELECTRICAL

POOL ROOM

STORAGE
MECH
ELEC. RM

GYM STORAGE

PUMP RM

EXIT PASSAGEWAY
FEMALE
MALE
A3-30
13 30" 30" 30" 30"
42"42"
42"
563.80
ARDEN AVE.

ARDEN AVE.

CENTRAL AVE.
5'-10"
4'-0"4'-0"4'-0"
4'-0"
4'-0"
4'-0"
4'-0"
4'-0"
SHEET
TITLE

PROJECT
TITLE
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
DATE

LANDSCAPE
AREA

SUMMARY
L-1.0

THIS PLAN DOES NOT COMMUNICATE

CONSTRUCTION MEANS OR METHODS AND

THEREFORE SHALL NOT BE USED FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR MISCONSTRUED AS A
CONSTRUCTION PLAN OR TECHNICAL DOCUMENT.

FINISH ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL

BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE
ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS.

THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN AND NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION.

LANDSCAPE AREA SUMMARY
ARDEN

RESIDENCES
820 N. CENTRAL AVE.

GLENDALE, CA 91203

THERE ARE NO PROTECTED OAK, SYCAMORE,

OR BAY TREES ON THE PROPERTY OR WITHIN
20’ OF THE PROPERTY

DSP ZONE LANDSCAPE AREA TABULATIONS
MINIMUM GARDEN AREA REQ'D:

MIN: 38,154 x 37% (SUBTERRANEAN PARKING)= 14,117 S.F.

TOTAL GARDEN AREA: 14,405 S.F.

LANDSCAPE AREAS:
5' PARKWAY, PER DSP ZONE
-BENCHES EVERY 50 L.F. (MIN.)
-STREET TREES (LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTA) PER URBAN FORESTRY 3'-0" BUILDING ADJACENT ZONE PER DSP ZONE: 1,765 SQ. FT. -REQ'D SEATING AREA 50%
-PROVIDED SEATING AREA 940 SQ. FT. 53%
-PROVIDED LANDSCAPE AREA 825 SQ. FT. 47%
PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PER DSP ZONE: 3,364 SQ. FT.
-REQ'D LANDSCAPING IN OPEN SPACE (25%)= 841 SQ. FT.
-PROVIDED LANDSCAPING IN OPEN SPACE= 1,416 SQ. FT.
-REQUIRED SHADE TREES (1 PER 600 SQ. FT.) 3,374/600= 6 TREES -PROVIDED SHADE TREES = 10 TREES
-MAXIMUM ALLOWED LANDSCAPING IN RAISED PLANTERS
-(25% OF LANDSCAPING)= 375 SQ. FT.
-PROVIDED LANDSCAPE IN RAISED PLANTERS= 30 SQ. FT.

SEATING AREA WITH

SITTING STOOLS

AND LOW TABLES (TYP)

SEATING AREA WITH

BISTRO TABLE

AND CHAIRS (TYP)

SEATING AREA WITH

AFFIXED BENCHES
10' WIDE SIDEWALK PER DSP ZONE
10' WIDE SIDEWALK PER DSP ZONE
SCALE: 3/32"=1'-0"

DSP ZONE LANDSCAPE SUMMARY
0 8' 16'32'
PA
PAPA
PA
PA
PA PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA

PAPAPAPA
PA
PA
PA

PAPAPAPAPA

ENHANCED PAVING

MATERIAL
SEE SHEET L-1.1

REFINED ENTRANCE-

ENHANCED PAVING

MATERIAL (TYP)
SEE SHEET L-1.1

WATER FEATURE
SEE SHEET L-1.1

SEATING LEDGE
SEE SHEET L-1.1

LANDSCAPE
BOULDER (12"-18")
SEE SHEET L-1.1 (TYP)
"S.T."= REQ'D SHADE TREE
36" BOX (TYP)
S.T. S.T.

S.T.

S.T. S.T.

REQ'D PARKWAY TREES

PER URBAN FORESTRY

LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS
SEE SHEET L-1.2 (TYP)
S.T.SHADE TREE

PAPLANTING AREA

ABBREVIATIONS
S.T.

PAPA
REQUIRED MINIMUM SOIL DEPTH:

GROUND LEVEL 24" DEEP
ABOVE GRADE PLANTERS WITH TREES: 36" DEEP
S.T.

S.T.

AFFIXED BENCHES (TYP)
ONE BENCH PER 50'
LINEAR FEET MIN.
635 of 918

UP
DN
DN
DN
UP

TRANSFORMER

ELECTRICAL

POOL ROOM

STORAGE
MECH
ELEC. RM

GYM STORAGE

PUMP RM

EXIT PASSAGEWAY
FEMALE
MALE
A3-30
13 30" 30" 30" 30"
42"42"
42"
563.80
ARDEN AVE.

ARDEN AVE.

CENTRAL AVE.
30"L x 30"W x 27"H TREE PLANTERS
'WILSHIRE' COLLECTION BY TOURNESOL

IN POWDER COATED ALUMINUM
'PUDDLE' COLOR

SITE FURNISHING
30"
42"L x 42"W x 36"H TREE PLANTERS
'WILSHIRE' COLLECTION BY TOURNESOL

IN POWDER COATED ALUMINUM
'PUDDLE' COLOR
42"
"PEBBLE STOOL" GFRC - LIGHTWEIGHT

CONCRETE SEATING IN ASSORTED SIZES BY

TOURNESOL
CAFE TABLES AND CHAIRS T.B.S. BY OWNER
'TRANSIT BENCH' BY TOURNESOL, 46"L,

BACKLESS, WOOD FINISH
SHEET
TITLE

PROJECT
TITLE
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
DATE

HARDSCAPE
L-1.1

THIS PLAN DOES NOT COMMUNICATE

CONSTRUCTION MEANS OR METHODS AND

THEREFORE SHALL NOT BE USED FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR MISCONSTRUED AS A
CONSTRUCTION PLAN OR TECHNICAL DOCUMENT.

FINISH ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL

BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE
ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS.

THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN AND NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION.

HARDSCAPE
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"

HARDSCAPE PLAN
0 8' 16'32'
ARDEN

RESIDENCES
820 N. CENTRAL AVE.

GLENDALE, CA 91203

REMOVE EXISTING

MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA

DURING PRE-CONSTRUCTION
REQ'D 4'-0" WIDE

PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
FROM CURB (TYP.)
REQ'D 10'-0" WIDE
SIDEWALK.

NATURAL GRAY CONC,
WITH 24"X24" SCORING

AND FINISH PER CITY

STANDARD
PA
PAPA

PA PAPAPA
PA
PA
PA

PA PA PA PA
PA PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA

PAPAPAPA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA

PORCELAIN WOOD-LOOK

PAVER FLOORING (HARD-SET) (TYP)

LANDSCAPE BOULDERS
1'-2' SIZES (TYP)
18"H X 20"W CAST-IN-PLACE BOARD-FORM CONCRETE SEATING LEDGE ALONG PLANTER PERIMETER- 103 LINEAL FEET
(HEIGHT INDICATED WITH RESPECT TO PAVER DECK ELEVATION) 24" X 48" LARGE SCALE PORCELAIN

PAVERS IN 'CENERE' CEMENT
OVER CONC. SLAB WITH 1
8" NATURAL

GRAY GROUT JOINTS

RECIRCULATING BUBBLING WATER FEATURE
"SEASIDE FOUNTAIN" 15"H x 30" DIA.

PA
PA= PLANTING AREA

TREE PLANTERS
(ON GRADE)
PA
PA PA
36" SOIL DEPTH
36" SOIL DEPTH
24" SOIL DEPTH
24" SOIL DEPTH
24" SOIL DEPTH
24" SOIL DEPTH

ALL SUBFLOOR, ROOF DECK AND SOIL-ADJACENT

PLANTER WALLS SHALL BE FULLY SEALED AND

PROTECTED WITH A WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE
TO BE SPECIFIED BY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. NO

FINISH SURFACES OR SOIL SHALL BE ATTACHED OR

PLACED ON THE STRUCTURE PRIOR TO
WATERPROOFING.

MAIN ENTRY WITH

PORCELAIN

WOOD-LOOK

PAVER FLOORING,

ACCENT BOULDERS IN

PLANTERS AND

SURFACE-MOUNT
BENCHES. SEE MATERIAL
PHOTOS ON SHEET L-1.5

OCCASIONAL TABLES

AND CHAIRS

BY OTHERS
B
L-2.0
A
L-2.0
ARTIFICIAL TURF OVER CONC. SLAB
+18"
+18"
+15"
SEAT-WALL IS 15"H HERE
(3" LOWER THAN

THE MAIN SEATWALL)
24" SOIL DEPTH
PA
R.O.W. HARDSCAPE

AND IMPROVEMENTS

PER CIVIL PLANS
636 of 918

UP
DN
DN
DN
UP

TRANSFORMER

ELECTRICAL

POOL ROOM

STORAGE
MECH
ELEC. RM

GYM STORAGE

PUMP RM

EXIT PASSAGEWAY
FEMALE
MALE
A3-30
13 563.80

PLANTING SCHEDULE

SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZEQUANTITY
COTYLEDON 'ORBICULATA'1 GAL PIG'S EAR
WUCOLS
L
ALOE 'HERCULES' (SINGLE HEAD)15 GAL HERCULES ALOEL
PITTOSPORUM TEN. MARJORIE CHANNON5 GAL MARJORIE CHANNON KOHUHUL IRIS GERMANICA 'FEEDBACK'1 GAL BEARDED IRISL
KALANCHOE BEHARENSIS15 GAL FELT BUSHL
AGAVE ATTENUATA 'RAY OF LIGHT'5 GAL VARIEGATED FOXTAIL AGAVEL ALOE STRIATA5 GAL CORAL ALOEL
CAREX FLACCA 'BLUE ZINGER'1 GAL BLUE SEDGEL
SENECIO SERPENS4" FLAT DWARF BLUE CHALKSTICKSL
AGAVE 'BLUE FLAME'5 GAL BLUE FLAME AGAVEL
DIANELLA 'SILVER STREAK5 GAL VARIEGATED FLAX LILYL
RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA 'LEATHER LEAF'5 GAL LEATHER LEAF COFFEEBERRYL CAREX DIVULSA5 GAL BERKELEY SEDGEL
ACACIA STENOPHYLLA3 SHOESTRING ACACIAVL

TREE SCHEDULE

SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAMESIZEQUANTITY WUCOLSMATURE HEIGHT
25' 24" BOX

ARBUTUS 'MARINA'

STANDARD
4 STRAWBERRY TREEL 25' 36" BOX

OLEA EUROPAEA
(18'H-20'H)
3 MANZANILLO OLIVEVL 25' FIELD DUG
WESTRINGIA 'MUNDI'5 GAL DWARF COAST ROSEMARYL
37 18
7 26
10 15
40 28
21 59
34 64
4 CARISSA MACROCARPA 'GREEN CARPET'1 GAL GREEN CARPET NATAL PLUML 440

LOPHOSTEMON

CONFERTUS
11 BRISBANE BOXM 40'-60' 24" BOX
ACACIA PODALYRIIFOLIA4 PEARL ACACIAL 15'-20' 15 GAL
17 SHEET
TITLE

PROJECT
TITLE
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
DATE

LANDSCAPE
L-1.2

THIS PLAN DOES NOT COMMUNICATE

CONSTRUCTION MEANS OR METHODS AND

THEREFORE SHALL NOT BE USED FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR MISCONSTRUED AS A
CONSTRUCTION PLAN OR TECHNICAL DOCUMENT.

FINISH ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL

BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE
ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS.

THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN AND NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION.

LANDSCAPE PLAN
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"

LANDSCAPE PLAN- STREET LEVEL
10'-0" OPEN SPACE SETBACK FROM
SIDEWALK- MAX. PLANTING HEIGHT 18"
0 8' 16'32'
ARDEN

RESIDENCES
820 N. CENTRAL AVE.

GLENDALE, CA 91203

THERE ARE NO PROTECTED OAK, SYCAMORE,

OR BAY TREES ON THE PROPERTY OR WITHIN
20’ OF THE PROPERTY

ON-SITE SOIL (OVER STRUCTURE)

USE OVERSTRUCTURE MIX LIGHTWEIGHT SOIL

AVAILABLE FROM AGUINAGA GREEN
1-877-OC-MULCH
637 of 918

6'-6"
DN
DN
MEN
WOMEN
4'-0" DEEP

TRANSITIONTRANSITION
3'-6" DEEP3'-6" DEEP
36" x 48"

CLEAR DECK

SPACE BEHIND

ADA LIFT
36" x 48"

CLEAR DECK

SPACE BEHIND

ADA LIFT
FT IN
UP DN
DN
UP
714 SF
L.1
1-BD
214
731 SF
J.1
1-BD
213
1,108 SF
H.1
2-BD
211
1,114 SF
F.4
2-BD
212
1,126 SF
F.1
2-BD
210
1,119 SF
F.5
2-BD
208
1,113 SF
F.2
2-BD
206
1,023 SF
A.1
2-BD
201
641 SF
E.1
1-BD
205
1,140 SF
P.1
2-BD
207
1,114 SF
F.3
2-BD
209
1,014 SF
K.1
2-BD
215
842 SF
D.2
1-BD
202
1,120 SF
C.1
2-BD
204

PLANTING SCHEDULE

SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZEQUANTITYWUCOLS
OLEA EUROPAEA 'LITTLE OLLIE'1 GAL70 DWARF OLIVE SHRUBL

ARBUTUS 'MARINA'
(MULTI)
7 STRAWBERRY TREEVL

TREE/ PALMS SCHEDULE

SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAMESIZEQUANTITY WUCOLSMATURE HEIGHT
15' 24" BOX
AEONIUM 'KIWI'1 GAL16 VARIEGATED AEONIUML
CHAMAEROPS HUMILIS5 MEDITERRANEAN FAN PALMVL 15' 24" BOX DIANELLA 'CASSA BLUE' 5 GAL36 DWARF FLAX LILYL
SETARIA PALMIFOLIA15 GAL2 PALM GRASSL
KALANCHOE BEHARENSIS15 GAL4 FELT BUSHL

BOUGAINVILLEA 'PURPLE QUEEN'
5 GAL25 PURPLE SHRUB BOUGAINVILLEAL
ACACIA SUBPOROSA24" BOX 5 RIVER WATTLEL
ALOE 'MEDUSA' (MULTI)24" BOX 2 ALOE TREEL
ARCHONTOPHOENIX CUNNINGHAMIANA 36" BOX 3 KING PALML
(MULTI)
15'
10-12'
16'
SANSEVIERA ZEYLANICA1 GAL42 SNAKE PLANTL
30" (TYP)
SHEET
TITLE

PROJECT
TITLE
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
DATE
POOL

TERRACE
L-1.3

THIS PLAN DOES NOT COMMUNICATE

CONSTRUCTION MEANS OR METHODS AND

THEREFORE SHALL NOT BE USED FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR MISCONSTRUED AS A
CONSTRUCTION PLAN OR TECHNICAL DOCUMENT.

FINISH ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL

BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE
ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS.

THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN AND NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION.

POOL TERRACE LANDSCAPE
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"

LANDSCAPE PLAN- POOL TERRACE
ARDEN

RESIDENCES
820 N. CENTRAL AVE.

GLENDALE, CA 91203
0 8' 16'32'

FURNITURE TO BE SELECTED

BY INTERIOR DESIGNER
24" X 48" x3
4" LARGE SCALE PORCELAIN

PAVERS IN 'CENERE' CEMENT
R11 ANTI-SLIP FINISH BY 'TILETECH PAVERS'

OVER PEDESTAL SYSTEM
96"L X 24"W X 36"H FRP "WILSHIRE" PLANTERS IN "PUDDLE"
WITH 4'H LASER-CUT SCREEN (86" TOTAL HT.) BY TOURNESOL

BY TOURNESOL
96"L X 24"W X 18"H FRP "WILSHIRE"
PLANTERS IN "PUDDLE"

BY TOURNESOL

CLUSTER OF ROUND ASSORTED SIZE
FRP "WILSHIRE" PLANTERS
WITH TOE KICK IN "PUDDLE" BY TOURNESOL
(60"DIA., 36" DIA. & 42"DIA.)
ROUND FRP "WILSHIRE"
PLANTERS WITH TOE KICK IN "PUDDLE"
BY TOURNESOL 36" DIA. (TYP)
ROUND FRP "WILSHIRE" PLANTERS
WITH TOE KICK IN "PUDDLE"
BY TOURNESOL 24" DIA. (TYP.)
ROUND FRP "WILSHIRE"
PLANTERS WITH TOE KICK IN "PUDDLE"
BY TOURNESOL 36" DIA. (TYP)
NOTE:

PEDESTAL PAVER SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED
PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS.

THESE PLANS DO NOT CONVEY TECHNICAL
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION.

DECK PLANTER WITH LIGHTWEIGHT
OVERSTRUCTURE SOIL MIX.

WATERPROOF INSIDE OF POT (BY OTHERS)
1 5
8" DIA. DRAIN HOLE
IN PLANTER. DRILL 2" DIA. HOLES IN

PAVERS TO ALIGN WITH PLANTER HOLES

WATERPROOFED SUB-FLOOR

SLOPES TO AREA DRAIN (BY OTHERS)

PEDESTAL SYSTEM (BY OTHERS)

PORCELAIN PAVER DECK
NTS

ON-DECK PLANTER DRAINAGE

PLANTER MANUFACTURER TO PROVIDE
DRAIN HOLES.

PROVIDE DRAIN HOLE EVERY 30" ON CENTER

IN RECTANGULAR PLANTERS POTS
3 4" GRAVEL 1
5 DEPTH OF PLANTER POT

WITH FILTER FABRIC BETWEEN SOIL

AND GRAVEL LAYER AND UP INSIDE WALLS OF POT
638 of 918

PLANTING SCHEDULE

SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZEQUANTITY
WESTRINGIA 'LOW HORIZON'DWARF COAST ROSEMARY5 GAL24
ACACIA COGNATA 'COUSIN ITT'5 GAL23 DWARF RIVER WATTLE
OLEA EUROPAEA 'SKYLARK'DWARF FRUITLESS OLIVE5 GAL14
DN
DN
UP
UP
982 SF
P.2
1-BD+DEN
807
1,014 SF
N.1
1-BD+DEN
809
1,007 SF
H.2
1-BD+DEN
811
579 SF
J.2
STUDIO
813
984 SF
K.2
2-BD
815
716 SF
L
1-BD
814
1,049 SF
N.3
1-BD+DEN
812
1,061 SF
N
1-BD+DEN
810
1,058 SF
N.2
1-BD+DEN
808
1,048 SF
N.1
1-BD+DEN
806
902 SF
D.3
1-BD+DEN
802
642 SF
E
1-BD
805
877 SF
C.3
2-BD
804
705 SF
Q
1-BD
803
684 SF
M
1-BD
801
902 SF
D.3
1-BD+DEN
802
684 SF
M
1-BD
801
SHEET
TITLE

PROJECT
TITLE
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
DATE
8TH FLOOR

LANDSCAPE
L-1.4

THIS PLAN DOES NOT COMMUNICATE

CONSTRUCTION MEANS OR METHODS AND

THEREFORE SHALL NOT BE USED FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR MISCONSTRUED AS A
CONSTRUCTION PLAN OR TECHNICAL DOCUMENT.

FINISH ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL

BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE
ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS.

THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN AND NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION.
8TH FLOOR LANDSCAPE & LV

LIGHTING
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
LANDSCAPE PLAN- 8TH FLOOR
ARDEN

RESIDENCES
820 N. CENTRAL AVE.

GLENDALE, CA 91203
0 8' 16'32'

PARAPET PLANTER

PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS

USE 'OVERSTRUCTURE'

LIGHTWEIGHT SOIL MIX BY
AQUINAGA GREEN.

FULLY WATERPROOF

INTERIOR OF ALL PLANTERS
(WATERPROOFING BY OTHERS)

FLOORING PER ARCHITECT

PLANT IMAGES- FIRST FLOOR LEVEL

WESTRINGIA 'LOW HORIZON' ACACIA COGNATA 'COUSIN ITT'

OLEA EUROPAEA 'SKYLARK'

LOW VOLTAGE LIGHTING

TLOW VOLTAGE LIGHTING TRANSFORMER
CORE FLAT-TOP INGROUND UPLIGHT | NATURAL BRONZE
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
LV LIGHTING- 8TH FLOOR
T
639 of 918

SHEET
TITLE

PROJECT
TITLE
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
DATE
GROUND
FLOOR

IMAGERY
L-1.5

THIS PLAN DOES NOT COMMUNICATE

CONSTRUCTION MEANS OR METHODS AND

THEREFORE SHALL NOT BE USED FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR MISCONSTRUED AS A
CONSTRUCTION PLAN OR TECHNICAL DOCUMENT.

FINISH ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL

BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE
ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS.

THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN AND NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION.

IMAGERY

PLANT IMAGES- FIRST FLOOR LEVEL

COTYLEDON 'ORBICULATA'ALOE 'HERCULES' (SINGLE HEAD)

IRIS GERMANICA 'FEEDBACK'KALANCHOE BEHARENSISAGAVE ATTENUATA 'RAY OF LIGHT'

ALOE STRIATA

CAREX FLACCA 'BLUE ZINGER'SENECIO SERPENS

AGAVE 'BLUE FLAME'

DIANELLA 'SILVER STREAK

RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA 'LEATHER LEAF'

CAREX DIVULSA

ACACIA STENOPHYLLA

ARBUTUS 'MARINA'OLEA EUROPAEA
(18'H-20'H)

HARDSCAPE IMAGES
SEASIDE FOUNTAIN 15"H X 30" DIA.

CURVED CONCRETE BENCH/ PLANTER WALL
ARDEN

RESIDENCES
820 N. CENTRAL AVE.

GLENDALE, CA 91203

WESTRINGIA 'MUNDI'

WOOD LOOK PAVERS
ARTERRA PAVER 'FAUNA' 8X47
2CM THICKNESS BY MSI

FURNITURE IMAGES
TRANSIT BENCH- WOOD FINISH (surface mount)
PEBBLE STOOL (LIGHTWEIGHT CONC.)
TYP. BISTRO/ CAFE TABLE SET
PITTOSPORUM TEN. MARJORIE CHANNON

ACACIA PODALYRIIFOLIA

CENERE CEMENT PORCELAIN PAVERS

AVAILABLE FROM 'REJUVENATION'
8780 VENICE BLVD
LOS ANGELES, CA 90034
310-400-1872
24"X48" BY TILETECH PAVERS

SOUTHWEST BOULDER AND STONE
BY TOURNESOL SITEWORKSBY TOURNESOL SITEWORKST.B.S. BY OWNERSHIP

ARTIFICIAL TURF SPECIFICATION

CARISSA MACROCARPA 'GREEN CARPET'

LOPHOSTEMON

CONFERTUS
640 of 918

SHEET
TITLE

PROJECT
TITLE
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
DATE

PLANTING

DETAILS &
NOTES
L-1.6

THIS PLAN DOES NOT COMMUNICATE

CONSTRUCTION MEANS OR METHODS AND

THEREFORE SHALL NOT BE USED FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR MISCONSTRUED AS A
CONSTRUCTION PLAN OR TECHNICAL DOCUMENT.

FINISH ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL

BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE
ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS.

THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN AND NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION.

PLANTING DETAILS
& NOTES
ARDEN

RESIDENCES
820 N. CENTRAL AVE.

GLENDALE, CA 91203

SHRUB PLANTING
SCALE: NTS

PLANTING ALONG PAVING
SCALE: NTS

GROUNDCOVER SPACING
SCALE: NTS
PLANTING NOTES:

1. THE PLANTING PLAN IS DIAGRAMMATIC. ALL PLANT LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. PLANT SYMBOLS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT QUANTITIES SPECIFIED.

2. QUANTITITES SHOWN ON THE PLANTING PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR.

3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE DESIGNER OF DISCREPANICES BETWEEN QUANTITIES & SYMBOLS SHOWN.

4. PLANT PITS SHALL BE TWICE THE SIZE OF THE DESIGNATED NURSERY CONTAINERS.

5. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE ROOT BOUND. FIVE GALLON PLANTS AND LARGER SHALL HAVE BEEN GROWN IN CONTAINERS FOR A MINIMUM OF 6 MONTHS AND A MAXIMUM OF 2 YEARS. PLANTS SHALL EXHIBIT HEALTHY GROWTH FREE OF DISEASES AND PESTS.

6. REMOVE NURSERY STAKES ON ALL VINES AND ATTACH TO ADJACENT WALLS OR FENCES WITH NON-METALLIC TIES. REMOVE NURSERY STAKES AND TIES FROM ALL TREES OR NURSERY STOCK. MAINTAIN SIDE GROWTH ON ALL TREES.

7. PROVIDE COMMERCIAL GRADE POLYESTER WEED CONTROL FABRIC UNDERLAYMENT BELOW ALL DECOMPOSED GRANITE PAVING AREAS. CUT HOLES IN FABRIC THE SIZE OF THE PLANT ROOTBALLS AT LOCATIONS OF INDIVIDUAL OR CLUSTER ACCENT PLANTINGS.

8. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL LEAVE THE SITE IN A CLEAN CONDITION, REMOVING ALL UNUSED MATERIAL, TRASH, AND TOOLS DAILY.

9. INSTALLER SHALL OBTAIN AGRONOMIC SOILS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS OF REPORT AND ADJUST PLANTING

BACKFILL PER SOILS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
USE 2" DEPTH TYPE 1 COMPOST PRODUCED USING CITY ORGANIC MATERIALS (TOPGRO) IN ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS AS TOPDRESS.

NOTE:

1. TOP OF ROOT CONTROL BARRIER MUST BE AT
GRADE.

2. POSITION ROOT CONTROL BARRIER ADJACENT TO
STRUCTURE.

3. BARRIER SHALL EXTEND A MIN. OF 12" BELOW
BOTTOM OF HARDSCAPE.

4. PROVIDE A MIN. OF 12' OF ROOT BARRIER PER
24" BOX TREE AND AN ADDITIONAL 4' PER 12" INCREASE
IN BOX SIZE.

5. ROOT BARRIER SHALL EXTEND BELOW GRADE A

DISTANCE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THE DEPTH OF
THE ROOT BALL.

6. ALL TREES WITHIN 5' OF HARDSCAPE (MEASURED FROM

THE OUTSIDE OF THE ROOTBALL) SHALL HAVE A
ROOT-BARRIER INSTALLED.

7. ROOT BARRIER DEVICE SHALL BE UV-STABILIZED
HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE.

ROOT-BARRIER
TYP.- WRAP FULLY

AROUND ROOT BALL

HARDSCAPE
FINISH

GRADE BACKFILL

ROOT BARRIER
REQUIRED WITHIN 5'-0"
SCALE: NTS

ROOT BARRIER DETAIL

PLANTING SOIL OVER ALL STRUCTURAL AREAS

OVERSTRUCTURE MIX (LIGHTWEIGHT PLANTER MIX)

AVAILABLE FROM AGUINAGA GREEN
1-877-OC-MULCH

TOPDRESS/ MULCH

LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS

1. PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL ROCKS GREATER THAN 1" DIAMETER, WEEDS, DEBRIS, & OTHER EXTRANEOUS MATERIAL IN PLANTING AREAS FROM THE JOB SITE & DISPOSE OF IT OFF-SITE IN A SUITABLE & LAWFUL MANNER.

2.UPON COMPLETION OF ALL IRRIGATION WORK, ALL PLANTING AREA, INCLUDING SLOPES AND TURF AREAS, SHALL BE SPRAYED WITH A SYSTEMIC HERBICIDE; CLEARED & GRUBBED OF SURFACE WEED GROWTH; & SHALL BE WEED FREE PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY PLANTING WORK. REFER TO "GROW-KILL-GROW" NOTES THIS SHEET.

3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ESTABLISH FINISH GRADE A MINIMUM OF SIX INCHES (6") BELOW THE FINISH FLOOR OF BUILDINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SMOOTH EVEN FINISH GRADES AT BUILDINGS, WALKS, OTHER PERMANENT OBJECTS & LIMITS OF WORK. ALL CHANGES IN GRADE SHALL BE BLENDED UNIFORM VERTICAL CURVES. ALL AREAS TO BE PLANTED IN TURF SHALL BE SMOOTHED TO THE OWNER'S SATISFACTION. OBJECTS SUCH AS ROCKS, DEBRIS, CLODS OR OTHER EXTRANEOUS MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM SITE.

4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DRAINAGE IN ALL PLANTING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CIVIL PLANS. GRADE ALL PLANTING AREAS AT A MINIMUM 2% GRADIENT.

5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE ON-SITE SOIL FOR ALL LANDSCAPE BERMS & MOUNDING. WHEN ON-SITE SOIL IS NOT AVAILABLE, IMPORT SOIL SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS:

SILT PLUS CLAY CONTENT OF THE IMPORT SOIL SHALL NOT EXCEED 20% BY WEIGHT WITH A MINIMUM 95% PASSING THE 2.0 MM. SIEVE. THE SODIUM ABSORPTION RATIO (SAR) SHALL NOT EXCEED 6.0 MM. & THE ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY (ECE) OF THE SATURATION EXTRACT OF THIS SOIL SHALL NOT EXCEED 3.0 MMHOS./CM AT 25OC.

THE BORON CONTENT OF THIS SOIL SHALL BE NO GREATER THAN 1 PPM AS MEASURED ON THE SATURATION EXTRACT. IN ORDER TO VERIFY CONFORMANCE, SAMPLES OF THE IMPORT SOIL SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE SOIL LABORATORY FOR ANALYSIS PRIOR TO IMPORT ON SITE.

6. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE OF A SIZE, CHARACTER & QUALITY WHICH MEETS THE ACCEPTED INDUSTRY

STANDARDS FOR THAT PLANT SPECIE & SHALL BE FREE FROM INSECTS, THEIR EGGS, DISEASE, WEEDS, OR OTHER DETRIMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS.

7. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE HANDLED & STORED SO THEY ARE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM DRYING OUT, SUN, WINDBURN, VANDALISM OR ANY OTHER INJURY.

8. THE OWNER & LANDSCAPE DESIGNER MAY REJECT ANY & ALL PLANT MATERIAL REGARDED AS UNSUITABLE AT ANY TIME. SUCH PLANTS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE JOB SITE IMMEDIATELY & BE REPLACED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER.

9. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED & PLANTED AS DETAILED & NOTED. ANY PROPOSED SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER AND LANDSCAPE DESIGNER PRIOR TO DELIVERY TO THE SITE.

10.ALL GROUND COVER AREAS SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE PLANTED WITH ROOTED CUTTINGS FROM FLATS CONTINUOUS UNDER TREES & SHRUBS & SPACED AS NOTED ON PLANS & STAGGERED AS SHOWN ON DETAIL.

11.ALL PLANTING AREAS DESIGNATED TO RECEIVE SHRUBS OR GROUND COVER FROM FLATS &/OR TURF (EXCEPT GROUND COVER AREAS ON SLOPES GRATER THAN 3:1 OR AREAS RECEIVING HYDROSEEDING) SHALL RECEIVE THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS PER 1,000 SQ.FT. & SHALL BE UNIFORMLY BLENDED INTO THE UPPER 6" OF THE SURFACE SOIL. ALL PLANTING AREAS LESS THAN 3" SLOPE SHALL BE CROSS RIPPED TO A 9" DEPTH PRIOR TO APPLYING SOIL AMENDMENTS. 2 CU. YDS. NITROGEN FORTIFIED ORGANIC AMENDMENT DERIVED FROM COMPOST, REDWOOD

SAWDUST, OR FIR SAWDUST (RATES AND FERTILIZERS MAY HAVE TO BE ADJUSTED DEPENDING ON ANALYSIS OF SELECTED COMPOST) 25 LBS. 6-24-24 XB+

12.BACKFILL MIX AROUND ALL CONTAINER PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING UNIFORMLY BLENDED MATERIALS:
6 PARTS BY VOLUME ON-SITE SOIL 2 PARTS BY VOLUME ORGANIC AMENDMENT PER ABOVE 10 LBS. 6-24-24 XB+ PER CUBIC YARD OF MIX 10 LBS. AGRICULTURAL GYPSUM PER CUBIC YARD OF MIX 1 LBS. IRON SULFATE PER CUBIC YARD OF MIX

13. FOR ITEMS 11 & 12 ABOVE:

THE ABOVE MENTIONED SOIL AMENDMENTS & BACK FILL MIX HAVE BEEN PROVIDED FOR BID PURPOSES ONLY, PENDING HORTICULTURAL SOILS REPORT AS NOTED IN ITEM NO. 9 UNDER LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO HORTICULTURAL SOILS REPORT FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.

14.PLANT FERTILIZER TABLETS SHALL BE `GRO-POWER' PLANTING TABLETS 12-8-8 (7 GRAM OR EQUAL). PLANTING TABLETS SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED AT RATES PER THE MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS. PLANT TABLETS SHALL BE PLACED AT THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL, APPROXIMATELY TWO INCHES (2") FROM ROOT TIP AT EVEN SPACING AROUND THE PLANT.

ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE THE DESIGNED DRAINAGE, ROOT BARRIERS, PLANT TABLETS, & MYCORRHIZAL PACKETS PER

SPECIFICATION
ALL PLANTS SHALL BE PRUNED AS DIRECTED BY OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. PLANTS WITH EVIDENT CIRCULAR ROOTS SHALL HAVE SIDES OF THE ROOTBALL SCARIFIED PRIOR TO PLANTING. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE WATERED IMMEDIATELY AFTER BACKFILLING PLANTING PITS. ALL AREAS RECEIVING PLANTS &/ OR HYDRO SEEDING SHALL BE MOIST TO A DEPTH OF 6" AT THE TIME OF PLANTING.

15.MYCORRHIZAL TABLETS SHALL BE "PLANT SUCCESS" TABLETS (OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) AVAILABLE FROM PLANT REVOLUTION (WWW.PLANT REVOLUTION.COM). TABLETS SHALL BE PLACED IN THE PLANTING PIT JUST BELOW THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL, TOUCHING THE ROOTBALL AND EVENLY SPACED AROUND THE PLANT.

16.AND OBTAIN A SOIL MANAGEMENT REPORT (INCLUDING SOIL TEXTURE, ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT AND AGRICULTURAL SUITABILITY SOILS REPORT.

TREE PLANTING
SCALE: NTS

TREE STAKING
SCALE: NTS
641 of 918

SHEET
TITLE

PROJECT
TITLE
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
DATE
POOL

TERRACE

IMAGERY
L-1.7

THIS PLAN DOES NOT COMMUNICATE

CONSTRUCTION MEANS OR METHODS AND

THEREFORE SHALL NOT BE USED FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR MISCONSTRUED AS A
CONSTRUCTION PLAN OR TECHNICAL DOCUMENT.

FINISH ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL

BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE
ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS.

THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN AND NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION.

POOL TERRACE IMAGERY
ARDEN

RESIDENCES
820 N. CENTRAL AVE.

GLENDALE, CA 91203

OLEA EUROPAEA 'LITTLE OLLIE'

ARBUTUS 'MARINA'
(MULTI)

AEONIUM 'KIWI'

PLANT IMAGES- POOL TERRACE

CHAMAEROPS HUMILIS
"WILSHIRE" PLANTER WITH DECORATIVE PRIVACY SCREEN

CASSA BLUE

KALANCHOE BEHARENSISBOUGAINVILLEA 'PURPLE QUEEN'

ACACIA SUBPOROSA

ALOE 'MEDUSA' (MULTI)

SETARIA PALMIFOLIA

PELARGONIUM 'PINK CASCADE'
(IN LARGE ROUND POTS UNDER SPECIMENS)

FINISHES AND AMMENITIES- POOL TERRACE
LOUVERED POOL CABANAS "K-BANA" 12'X12' WITH LOUVERED SIDES BY AZENCO: (305) 306-3204

LARGE SCALE POOL DECK PAVERS
SQUARE "WILSHIRE" PLANTERS
ROUND "WILSHIRE" PLANTERS

SANSEVIERA ZEYLANICA

CENERE CEMENT PORCELAIN PAVERS
24"X48" BY TILETECH PAVERS
SEE ALLOUTS ON SHEET L-1.4 FOR SPECS CENERE CEMENT PORCELAIN PAVERS 24"X48" BY TILETECH PAVERS
642 of 918

UP
DN
DN
DN
UP

TRANSFORMER

ELECTRICAL

POOL ROOM

STORAGE
MECH
ELEC. RM

GYM STORAGE

PUMP RM

EXIT PASSAGEWAY
FEMALE
MALE
A3-30
13 30" 30" 30" 30"
42"42"
42"
563.80
ARDEN AVE.

CENTRAL AVE.

SHEET
TITLE

PROJECT
TITLE
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
DATE
LV

LANDSCAPE

LIGHTING
L-1.8

THIS PLAN DOES NOT COMMUNICATE

CONSTRUCTION MEANS OR METHODS AND

THEREFORE SHALL NOT BE USED FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR MISCONSTRUED AS A
CONSTRUCTION PLAN OR TECHNICAL DOCUMENT.

FINISH ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL

BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE
ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS.

THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN AND NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION.

LOW VOLTAGE

LANDSCAPE LIGHTING
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
L.V. LANDSCAPE LIGHTING
0 8' 16'32'
ARDEN

RESIDENCES
820 N. CENTRAL AVE.

GLENDALE, CA 91203

LOW VOLTAGE LIGHTING
PATH LIGHT | NATURAL BRONZE

TLOW VOLTAGE LIGHTING TRANSFORMER
ACCENT UPLIGHT- SMALL | NATURAL BRONZE
ACCENT UPLIGHT- LARGE | NATURAL BRONZE

ALL LANDSCAPE

LIGHTING SHALL BE
3,000 KELVINS
AND NOT EXCEED 430
LUMENS
T
H20
643 of 918

6'-6"
DN
DN
MEN
WOMEN
4'-0" DEEP

TRANSITIONTRANSITION
3'-6" DEEP3'-6" DEEP
36" x 48"

CLEAR DECK

SPACE BEHIND

ADA LIFT
36" x 48"

CLEAR DECK

SPACE BEHIND

PROJECT
TITLE
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
DATE
LV

LANDSCAPE

LIGHTING

POOL DECK
L-1.9

THIS PLAN DOES NOT COMMUNICATE

CONSTRUCTION MEANS OR METHODS AND

THEREFORE SHALL NOT BE USED FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR MISCONSTRUED AS A
CONSTRUCTION PLAN OR TECHNICAL DOCUMENT.

FINISH ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL

BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE
ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS.

THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN AND NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION.

LOW VOLTAGE

LANDSCAPE LIGHTING

PPOL DECK
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
L.V. LANDSCAPE LIGHTING
0 8' 16'32'
ARDEN

RESIDENCES
820 N. CENTRAL AVE.

GLENDALE, CA 91203

LOW VOLTAGE LIGHTING

TLOW VOLTAGE LIGHTING TRANSFORMER
CORE FLAT-TOP INGROUND UPLIGHT | NATURAL BRONZE

ALL LANDSCAPE

LIGHTING SHALL BE
2,700 KELVINS
AND NOT EXCEED 430
LUMENS
T
644 of 918

EXIT

3.75" (MAX)3.75" (MAX)
1'-6"
15"
24"
5'-6" C.C. (TYP.)
20"
46'-10" 41'-4"
41'-6"
44'-2"
44'-7"
20'-0" 20'-0" 20'-0"
15'-6"
20'-0"
20'-0"
17'-4"20'-0"
UP
DN
DN
DN
UP

TRANSFORMER

ELECTRICAL

POOL ROOM

STORAGE
MECH
ELEC. RM

GYM STORAGE

PUMP RM

EXIT PASSAGEWAY
FEMALE
MALE
A3-30
13 30" 30" 30" 30"
42"42"
42"
563.80
ARDEN AVE.

ARDEN AVE.

CENTRAL AVE.
5'-10"
4'-0"4'-0"4'-0"
4'-0"
4'-0"4'-0"
4'-0"
4'-0"
24"
VARIES
SHEET
TITLE

PROJECT
TITLE
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
DATE

PLANTER

STEMWALLS
& SECT./ELEV.

L-2.0

THIS PLAN DOES NOT COMMUNICATE

CONSTRUCTION MEANS OR METHODS AND

THEREFORE SHALL NOT BE USED FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR MISCONSTRUED AS A
CONSTRUCTION PLAN OR TECHNICAL DOCUMENT.

FINISH ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL

BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE
ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS.

THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN AND NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION.

LANDSCAPE STEMWALL

LOCATIONS AND

SECTIONS/ELEVATIONS
SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0"

PEDESTRIAN GATES
ARDEN

RESIDENCES
820 N. CENTRAL AVE.

GLENDALE, CA 91203

WATERPROOFING, GRADING/ DRAINAGE AND

ENGINEERING BY OTHERS
1 2"x1" BOX TUBE STEEL
1X3 GALVANIZED BOX

STEEL GATE FRAME

SELF CLOSING AND

SELF LOCKING GATE
(OPENS OUT)

SELF CLOSING AND

SELF LOCKING GATE
(OPENS IN)
1"x1
2"X1
8"CHANNEL STEEL

ENCASING IPE WOOD
PLANKS
1 2"x1
8" FLAT STOCK

STEEL SEAMING RIB
1 2"X1"BOX STEEL

CROSS MEMBERS
NOTE: GATE FABRICATOR TO PROVIDE FINAL

WORKING SHOP DRAWINGS FOR GATES

SIDEYARD/ POOL GATEUTILITY ROOM GATE
SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0"

OPEN SPACE SECTION/ ELEVATION

WALL OF BUILDING
15"H FOUNTAIN ON CMU BASE

BOARD FORM CONCRETE

SEATEWALL/ PLANTER WALL
WITH 45° 1" CHAMFER

AT TOP EDGES-

WATERPROOFED PER

WATERPROOFING

CONSULTANT
12"-18" LANDSCAPE BOULDER

STRUCTURAL SUBTERRANEAN

GARAGE ROOF PER ARCHITECTURAL

AND ENGINEERING

SITE WALL PER

ENGINEERING

STRUCTURAL FOAM

FRENCH DRAIN WITH PERFORATED
4" PVC (DRAIN HOLES FACING DOWN),
WASHED 3
4" GRAVEL AND WRAPPED
IN FILTER FABRIC. DRAIN TO STORMWATER SEWER (TYP.)

ALL SURFACES SHALL BE

WATERPROOFED

PER WATERPROOFING

CONSULTANT/ ENGINEER

ATRIUM GRATE

DRAIN IN

PLANTER AREA
PER CIVIL (TYP.)

ARTIFICIAL TURF OVER SLAB
A
B

CMU STEM WALL
PER ENG.

STEMWALL AND CONNECTIONS PER ENGINEERING

STRUCTURAL FOAM
CONC. SLAB WITH OR

WITHOUT TOP FINISH

PER ENGINEERING

PLANTING AREA/ SOIL

STRUCTURAL ROOF
6"W STEMWALL AT HARDSCAPE PERIMETER/

SOIL EDGE EXTENDING DOWN TO STRUCTURAL ROOF
(PER ENGINEERING)
20"W (MAX) STEMWALL/ SEATWALL EXTENDING

DOWN TO STRUCTURAL ROOF (PER ENGINEERING)

FRENCH DRAIN TO TIE INTO STORMWATER SEWER
(POINTS OF CONNECTION BY OTHERS)
SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0"

LANDSCAPE STEMWALLS LEGEND
SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0"

TYPICAL FLATWORK/ PLANTER STEMWALL SEPARATION

FRENCH DRAIN WITH PERFORATED
4" PVC (DRAIN HOLES FACING DOWN),
WASHED 3
4" GRAVEL AND WRAPPED
IN FILTER FABRIC. DRAIN TO
STORMWATER SEWER (TYP.)
645 of 918

WM
F

2.0 7
E1
3 4"
610 SQ. FT.

2.8 8
D1
3 4"
44 SQ. FT.

2.2 9
E2
3 4"
640 SQ. FT.

2.1 1
A1
3 4"
627 SQ. FT.

2.0 3
A3
3 4"
647 SQ. FT.

2.4 2
A2
3 4"
769 SQ. FT.

IRRIGATION MAINLINE
SHOWN OUTSIDE P.L.

BOUNDARIES FOR CLARITY.

INSTALL WITHIN PROPERTY

BOUNDARIES (TYP)
FV
FV
FV
FV
FV
FV
FV
FV
FV
C

LOCATE BACKFLOW DEVICE INSIDE

BUILDING PER PLUMBING PLAN

UP TO POOL
DECK P.O.C.

PER PLUMBING
PLAN
IRR. P.O.C. (SEE CIVIL)
UP
DN
DN
DN
UP

TRANSFORMER

ELECTRICAL

POOL ROOM

STORAGE
MECH
ELEC. RM

GYM STORAGE

PUMP RM

EXIT PASSAGEWAY
FEMALE
MALE
A3-30
13 563.80
MANUF. MODEL NO./ DESCRIPTION PSIG.P.MDRIPPERPRECIP. RATE TLCV6-1201 - 0.4 GPH
LVCZS8010075-LF

NETAFIM- LITE ON-SURFACE

SYMBOLSPACING
TUBE

SPACING
MANUF. MODEL NO./ DESCRIPTION PSIG.P.MRADIUS
HUNTER RZWS-18-25-CV
SYMBOL

IRRIGATION METHODS

DRIP TUBING
NETAFIM42 PER ZONE
(REFER TO PLAN)
12"0.4

IRRIGATION UTILITES
LANDSCAPE WATER METER- WATER PRESSURE IS ASSUMED TO BE 75-130 P.S.I.

CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND PRESSURE PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK WILKINS MODEL#: 500XL PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE W/ REDUCED PRESSURE SET AT 45 P.S.I.

NON-PRESSURIZED SCH. 40 SUPPLY LATERAL
NOTE: EXHAUST LATERALS AND DISTRIBUTION TUBING NOT SHOWN

IRRIGATION CONTROLLER
MANUAL FLUSH VALVE: NETAFIN MODEL# TLSOV
INSTALL IN VALVE BOX WITH GRAVEL SUMP.FV

NORMALLY CLOSED MASTER VALVE- LINE SIZE
FIRRITROL FS-B-125 FLOW SENSOR- LINE SIZE
FEBCO 825Y REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTER

HUNTER PRO-HC STATION CONTROLLER WITH WI-FI FUNCTION

HUNTER RAIN CLIK WEATHER BASED SENSOR (WIRED OR WIRELESS) C

IRRIGATION PIPING
1 1
4" IRRIGATION PRESSURE MAINLINE SCH. 40 PVC- BURY MIN. 18" BELOW GRADE WITH SCH. 80 FITTINGS
NON-PRESSURE LATERAL SCH. 40 PVC WITH SCH. 40 FITTINGS UP TO 1.25" BURY MIN. 12" BELOW GRADE
NOTE: FOR UNDER FLATWORK, USE PVC SCHEDULE 40
SLEEVING (2x SIZE OF WORKING PIPE)

VALVE KEY

CONTROL STATION

VALVE SIZE
MAX. GPM DEMAND
#HYDROZONE

ZONE TYPE DESCRIPTION
AREA SQ. FT. SQ. FT.

NETAFIM OR RAINBIRD LOW/ HIGH FLOW CONTROL ZONE KIT-

KIT IS PRE-ASSEMBLED WITH CONTROL VALVE,
FILTER & PRESSURE REGULATOR. INSTALL WITH

ANTI-SIPHON VALVE

REFERENCE LOCATIONS
FOR IRRIGATION DETAILS SEE SHEET: I-4
18"

BALL VALVE- LINE SIZE
RSD
HUNTER PRO-ASV 3
4" REMOTE CONTROL VALVE

WITH FLOW CONTROL
HATCH

PATTERNS
TREE BUBBLERS (MED WATER REQ.)
HUNTER30 0.25360
SLEEVING: SCHEDULE 40 PVC 2x SIZE OF WORKING PIPE- LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE

DIAGRAMMATIC AND NOT ACTUAL- FIELD CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE SLEEVING AS NEEDED WM
MANUF. MODEL NO./ DESCRIPTION PSIG.P.M SYMBOL

POINT-SOURCE DRIP
RAIBIRD42 0.016 BUTTON EMITTER (1GPH)
RAINBIRD VALVE KIT XCZ075PRF

LANDSCAPE/ HYDROZONE MATRIX TABLE (GROUND LEVEL)

CONTROL
ZONE
SQUARE
FEET

PLANT TYPE/

PLANT FACTOR

HYDROZONE
BASIS

HYDROZONE

DESCRIPTIONSEXPOSUREIRRIGATION
METHOD

IRRIGATION DEVICE

MFGR/MODEL NUMBER
ZONE

PRESSURE
PRECIP.

RATE
ZONE
G.P.M. HYDROZONEZONE

SYMBOLS
AREA/

DESCRIPTION
1627L/ 0.3GC, S, G,T SUND42 0.73 2.1 A1

LOW WATER/

DRIPPL, IR
TLCV6-12xx - 0.4 GPH

NETAFIM- LITE ON-SURFACE

NETAFIM CONTROL ZONE KIT
LVCZ8010075-LF
2 769L/ 0.3GC, S, G,T SUND42 0.73 2.4 A2

LOW WATER/

DRIPPL, IR
TLCV6-12xx - 0.4 GPH

NETAFIM- LITE ON-SURFACE

NETAFIM CONTROL ZONE KIT
LVCZ8010075-LF
3647 L/ 0.3GC, S, G,T SUND42 0.73 2.0 A3

LOW WATER/

DRIPPL, IR
TLCV6-12xx - 0.4 GPH

NETAFIM- LITE ON-SURFACE

NETAFIM CONTROL ZONE KIT
LVCZ8010075-LF

LANDSCAPE/ HYDROZONE MATRIX TABLE (POOL DECK PLANTERS & POOL/SPA) LANDSCAPE AREA2,043
GPM
GPM
GPM
GPM
5 TO 10
0 TO 5
10 TO 15
15 TO 25
NOTE:
3/4" SCH 40 PVC PIPE
1" SCH 40 PVC PIPE
1-1/2" SCH 40 PVC PIPE
1-1/4" SCH 40 PVC PIPE

PIPE SIZING CHART
SIZE EXCEED DESIGNATED GPM RANGE.

PIPE SIZING CHART, IN NO INSTANCE SHALL PIPE

CONTRACTOR SHALL SIZE ALL LATERAL LINES PER
9 399L/ 0.3SSUND42 0.73 1.2 E2
844M/ 0.4T42NA 4.5 D1SUNFB

LOW WATER/
DRIP/ R.O.W.PL, IR

PL, IR TREES/ PALMS
TLCV6-12xx - 0.4 GPH

NETAFIM- LITE ON-SURFACE

NETAFIM CONTROL ZONE KIT
LVCZ8010075-LF
HUNTER RZWS-18-25-CV
HUNTER PRO-ASV 3
4" RCV
7610L/ 0.3 SSUND42 0.73 2.0 E1

LOW WATER/
DRIP/ R.O.W.PL, IR
TLCV6-12xx - 0.4 GPH

NETAFIM- LITE ON-SURFACE

NETAFIM CONTROL ZONE KIT
LVCZ8010075-LF
LANDSCAPE/ HYDROZONE MATRIX TABLE (PARKWAY/ R.O.W.)

CONTROL
ZONE
SQUARE
FEET

PLANT TYPE/

PLANT FACTOR

HYDROZONE
BASIS

HYDROZONE

DESCRIPTIONSEXPOSUREIRRIGATION
METHOD

IRRIGATION DEVICE

MFGR/MODEL NUMBER
ZONE

PRESSURE
PRECIP.

RATE
ZONE
G.P.M. HYDROZONEZONE

SYMBOLS
AREA/

DESCRIPTION
LANDSCAPE AREA1,053
SHEET
TITLE

PROJECT
TITLE
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
DATE

IRRIGATION

GROUND LEVEL
I-1

THIS PLAN DOES NOT COMMUNICATE

CONSTRUCTION MEANS OR METHODS AND

THEREFORE SHALL NOT BE USED FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR MISCONSTRUED AS A
CONSTRUCTION PLAN OR TECHNICAL DOCUMENT.

FINISH ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL

BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE
ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS.

THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN AND NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION.

IRRIGATION- GROUND LEVEL
ARDEN

RESIDENCES
820 N. CENTRAL AVE.

GLENDALE, CA 91203
SCALE: 1/10"=1'-0"

IRRIGATION PLAN- GROUND LEVEL
646 of 918

6'-6"
DN
DN
MEN
WOMEN
4'-0" DEEP

TRANSITIONTRANSITION
3'-6" DEEP3'-6" DEEP
36" x 48"

CLEAR DECK

SPACE BEHIND

ADA LIFT
36" x 48"

CLEAR DECK

SPACE BEHIND

ADA LIFT
FT IN

POOL DECK

IRRIGATION
P.O.C.

2.9 4
B1
3 4"
327 SQ. FT.

2.0 5
A4
3 4"
412 SQ. FT.

UP DN
DN
UP
714 SF
L.1
1-BD
214
731 SF
J.1
1-BD
213
1,108 SF
H.1
2-BD
211
1,114 SF
F.4
2-BD
212
1,126 SF
F.1
2-BD
210
1,119 SF
F.5
2-BD
208
1,113 SF
F.2
2-BD
206
1,023 SF
A.1
2-BD
201
641 SF
E.1
1-BD
205
1,140 SF
P.1
2-BD
207
1,114 SF
F.3
2-BD
209
1,014 SF
K.1
2-BD
215
842 SF
D.2
1-BD
202
1,120 SF
C.1
2-BD
204
FV FV
FV
FV FV
MANUF. MODEL NO./ DESCRIPTION PSIG.P.MDRIPPERPRECIP. RATE TLCV6-1201 - 0.4 GPH
LVCZS8010075-LF

NETAFIM- LITE ON-SURFACE

SYMBOLSPACING
TUBE

SPACING
MANUF. MODEL NO./ DESCRIPTION PSIG.P.MRADIUS
HUNTER RZWS-18-25-CV
SYMBOL

IRRIGATION METHODS

DRIP TUBING
NETAFIM42 PER ZONE
(REFER TO PLAN)
12"0.4

IRRIGATION UTILITES
LANDSCAPE WATER METER- WATER PRESSURE IS ASSUMED TO BE 75-130 P.S.I.

CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND PRESSURE PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK WILKINS MODEL#: 500XL PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE W/ REDUCED PRESSURE SET AT 45 P.S.I.

NON-PRESSURIZED SCH. 40 SUPPLY LATERAL
NOTE: EXHAUST LATERALS AND DISTRIBUTION TUBING NOT SHOWN

IRRIGATION CONTROLLER
MANUAL FLUSH VALVE: NETAFIN MODEL# TLSOV
INSTALL IN VALVE BOX WITH GRAVEL SUMP.FV

NORMALLY CLOSED MASTER VALVE- LINE SIZE
FIRRITROL FS-B-125 FLOW SENSOR- LINE SIZE
FEBCO 825Y REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTER

HUNTER PRO-HC STATION CONTROLLER WITH WI-FI FUNCTION

HUNTER RAIN CLIK WEATHER BASED SENSOR (WIRED OR WIRELESS) C

VALVE KEY

CONTROL STATION

VALVE SIZE
MAX. GPM DEMAND
#HYDROZONE

ZONE TYPE DESCRIPTION
AREA SQ. FT. SQ. FT.

NETAFIM OR RAINBIRD LOW/ HIGH FLOW CONTROL ZONE KIT-

KIT IS PRE-ASSEMBLED WITH CONTROL VALVE,
FILTER & PRESSURE REGULATOR. INSTALL WITH

ANTI-SIPHON VALVE

REFERENCE LOCATIONS
FOR IRRIGATION DETAILS SEE SHEET: I-4
18"

BALL VALVE- LINE SIZE
RSD
HUNTER PRO-ASV 3
4" REMOTE CONTROL VALVE

WITH FLOW CONTROL
HATCH

PATTERNS
TREE BUBBLERS (MED WATER REQ.)
HUNTER30 0.25360
SLEEVING: SCHEDULE 40 PVC 2x SIZE OF WORKING PIPE- LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE

DIAGRAMMATIC AND NOT ACTUAL- FIELD CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE SLEEVING AS NEEDED WM
MANUF. MODEL NO./ DESCRIPTION PSIG.P.M SYMBOL

POINT-SOURCE DRIP
RAIBIRD42 0.016 BUTTON EMITTER (1GPH)
RAINBIRD VALVE KIT XCZ075PRF

LANDSCAPE/ HYDROZONE MATRIX TABLE (POOL DECK PLANTERS & POOL/SPA)

CONTROL
ZONE
SQUARE
FEET

PLANT TYPE/

PLANT FACTOR

HYDROZONE
BASIS

HYDROZONE

DESCRIPTIONSEXPOSUREIRRIGATION
METHOD

IRRIGATION DEVICE

MFGR/MODEL NUMBER
ZONE

PRESSURE
PRECIP.

RATE
ZONE
G.P.M. HYDROZONEZONE

SYMBOLS
AREA/

DESCRIPTION
4327L/ 0.3GC, S, G,T SUND42 0.73 3 B1

POINT SOURCE

BUTTON DRIPPERSPL, IR
5412L/ 0.3GC, S, GSUND42 0.73 2.0 A4

LOW WATER/
DRIP/ R.O.W.PL, IR
TLCV6-12xx - 0.4 GPH

NETAFIM- LITE ON-SURFACE

NETAFIM CONTROL ZONE KIT
LVCZ8010075-LF
BUTTON EMITTER (1GPH)
LANDSCAPE AREA2,194
C11,455H/ 1.0

LOW WATER/
DRIP/ R.O.W.

RAINBIRD VALVE KIT XCZ075PRF
LANDSCAPE/ HYDROZONE MATRIX TABLE (8TH FLOOR TERRACE)

CONTROL
ZONE
SQUARE
FEET

PLANT TYPE/

PLANT FACTOR

HYDROZONE
BASIS

HYDROZONE

DESCRIPTIONSEXPOSUREIRRIGATION
METHOD

IRRIGATION DEVICE

MFGR/MODEL NUMBER
ZONE

PRESSURE
PRECIP.

RATE
ZONE
G.P.M. HYDROZONEZONE

SYMBOLS
AREA/

DESCRIPTION
6 124L/ 0.3GC, S, G,T SUND42 0.73 0.6 A5PL, IR
LANDSCAPE AREA124
NA

LOW WATER/
DRIP
TLCV6-12xx - 0.4 GPH

NETAFIM- LITE ON-SURFACE

NETAFIM CONTROL ZONE KIT
LVCZ8010075-LF
GPM
GPM
GPM
GPM
5 TO 10
0 TO 5
10 TO 15
15 TO 25
NOTE:
3/4" SCH 40 PVC PIPE
1" SCH 40 PVC PIPE
1-1/2" SCH 40 PVC PIPE
1-1/4" SCH 40 PVC PIPE

PIPE SIZING CHART
SIZE EXCEED DESIGNATED GPM RANGE.

PIPE SIZING CHART, IN NO INSTANCE SHALL PIPE

CONTRACTOR SHALL SIZE ALL LATERAL LINES PER
1,058 SF
N.2
1-BD+DEN
808
1,048 SF
N.1
1-BD+DEN
806
902 SF
D.3
1-BD+DEN
802
684 SF
M
1-BD
801

TERRACE

IRRIGATION
P.O.C.

1.4 6
A5
3 4"
124 SQ. FT.

FV
FV
SHEET
TITLE

PROJECT
TITLE
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
DATE

IRRIGATION

POOL DECK &
8TH FLOOR
I-2

THIS PLAN DOES NOT COMMUNICATE

CONSTRUCTION MEANS OR METHODS AND

THEREFORE SHALL NOT BE USED FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR MISCONSTRUED AS A
CONSTRUCTION PLAN OR TECHNICAL DOCUMENT.

FINISH ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL

BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE
ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS.

THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN AND NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION.

IRRIGATION- POOL DECK & 8TH

FLOOR PLANTERS
ARDEN

RESIDENCES
820 N. CENTRAL AVE.

GLENDALE, CA 91203
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"

IRRIGATION PLAN- POOL DECK

CONCEAL PIPING AND SLEEVING UNDER PEDESTAL DECK
SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0"
IRRIGATION PLAN- 8TH FLOOR
647 of 918

LANDSCAPE/ HYDROZONE MATRIX TABLE (GROUND LEVEL)

CONTROL
ZONE
SQUARE
FEET

PLANT TYPE/

PLANT FACTOR

HYDROZONE
BASIS

HYDROZONE

DESCRIPTIONSEXPOSUREIRRIGATION
METHOD

IRRIGATION DEVICE

MFGR/MODEL NUMBER
ZONE

PRESSURE
PRECIP.

RATE
ZONE
G.P.M. HYDROZONEZONE

SYMBOLS
AREA/

DESCRIPTION
1 627L/ 0.3GC, S, G,T SUND42 0.73 2.1 A1

LOW WATER/

DRIPPL, IR
TLCV6-12xx - 0.4 GPH

NETAFIM- LITE ON-SURFACE

NETAFIM CONTROL ZONE KIT
LVCZ8010075-LF
2 769L/ 0.3GC, S, G,T SUND42 0.73 2.4 A2

LOW WATER/

DRIPPL, IR
TLCV6-12xx - 0.4 GPH

NETAFIM- LITE ON-SURFACE

NETAFIM CONTROL ZONE KIT
LVCZ8010075-LF
3 647L/ 0.3GC, S, G,T SUND42 0.73 2.0 A3

LOW WATER/

DRIPPL, IR
TLCV6-12xx - 0.4 GPH

NETAFIM- LITE ON-SURFACE

NETAFIM CONTROL ZONE KIT
LVCZ8010075-LF

LANDSCAPE/ HYDROZONE MATRIX TABLE (POOL DECK PLANTERS & POOL/SPA)

CONTROL
ZONE
SQUARE
FEET

PLANT TYPE/

PLANT FACTOR

HYDROZONE
BASIS

HYDROZONE

DESCRIPTIONSEXPOSUREIRRIGATION
METHOD

IRRIGATION DEVICE

MFGR/MODEL NUMBER
ZONE

PRESSURE
PRECIP.

RATE
ZONE
G.P.M. HYDROZONEZONE

SYMBOLS
AREA/

DESCRIPTION
4327L/ 0.3GC, S, G,T SUND42 0.73 3 B1

POINT SOURCE

BUTTON DRIPPERSPL, IR
5412L/ 0.3GC, S, GSUND42 0.73 2.0 A4

LOW WATER/
DRIP/ R.O.W.PL, IR
TLCV6-12xx - 0.4 GPH

NETAFIM- LITE ON-SURFACE

NETAFIM CONTROL ZONE KIT
LVCZ8010075-LF
BUTTON EMITTER (1GPH)
LANDSCAPE AREA2,043
LANDSCAPE AREA2,194
LANDSCAPE/ HYDROZONE MATRIX TABLE (PARKWAY/ R.O.W.)
C11,455H/ 1.0

LOW WATER/
DRIP/ R.O.W.

RAINBIRD VALVE KIT XCZ075PRF
LANDSCAPE/ HYDROZONE MATRIX TABLE (8TH FLOOR TERRACE)

CONTROL
ZONE
SQUARE
FEET

PLANT TYPE/

PLANT FACTOR

HYDROZONE
BASIS

HYDROZONE

DESCRIPTIONSEXPOSUREIRRIGATION
METHOD

IRRIGATION DEVICE

MFGR/MODEL NUMBER
ZONE

PRESSURE
PRECIP.

RATE
ZONE
G.P.M. HYDROZONEZONE

SYMBOLS
AREA/

DESCRIPTION
6 124L/ 0.3GC, S, G,T SUND42 0.73 0.6 A5PL, IR
LANDSCAPE AREA124
NA

LOW WATER/
DRIP
TLCV6-12xx - 0.4 GPH

NETAFIM- LITE ON-SURFACE

NETAFIM CONTROL ZONE KIT
LVCZ8010075-LF
SHEET
TITLE

PROJECT
TITLE
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
DATE

IRRIGATION

NOTES & MWELO
I-3

THIS PLAN DOES NOT COMMUNICATE

CONSTRUCTION MEANS OR METHODS AND

THEREFORE SHALL NOT BE USED FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR MISCONSTRUED AS A
CONSTRUCTION PLAN OR TECHNICAL DOCUMENT.

FINISH ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL

BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE
ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS.

THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN AND NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION.

IRRIGATION NOTES

AND MWELO
ARDEN

RESIDENCES
820 N. CENTRAL AVE.

GLENDALE, CA 91203

TOTAL SITE LANDSCAPE
AREA: 4,361 SQ. FT.

THESE PLANS CONFORM

TO THE PERFORMANCE APPROACH

OF THE MWELO

1. ALL LOCAL MUNICIPAL AND STATE LAWS, RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING OR RELATING TO ANY

PORTION OF THIS WORK ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED INTO AND MADE A PART OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS AND THEIR PROVISIONS SHALL BE CARRIED OUT BY THE CONTRACTOR.

2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, STRUCTURES AND SERVICES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. THE LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES, STRUCTURES AND SERVICES SHOWN IN THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THESE PLANS AND ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.

3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE PERTINENT ENGINEERING OR ARCHITECTURAL PLANS BEFORE BEGINNING WORK.

4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS REQUIRED TO PERFORM THE WORK INDICATED HEREIN BEFORE BEGINNING WORK.

5. THIS DESIGN IS DIAGRAMMATIC. ALL EQUIPMENT SHOWN IN PAVED AREAS IS FOR DESIGN CLARITY ONLY AND IS TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN PLANTING AREAS.

6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT WILLFULLY INSTALL ANY EQUIPMENT AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS WHEN IT IS

OBVIOUS IN THE FIELD THAT UNKNOWN CONDITIONS EXIST THAT WERE NOT EVIDENT AT THE TIME THESE PLANS WERE PREPARED. ANY SUCH CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER'S

REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO ANY WORK OR THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY FIELD CHANGES DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE OWNER.

7. INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AS SHOWN IN THE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE

RESPONSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL CITY, COUNTY AND STATE REQUIREMENTS FOR BOTH EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION.

8. ACTUAL LOCATION FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER IS TO BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.

9. CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL PILOT WIRE FROM CONTROLLER ALONG ENTIRETY OF MAIN LINE TO THE LAST RCV ON EACH AND EVERY LEG OF MAIN LINE. LABEL SPARE WIRES AT BOTH ENDS.

10. ALL PIPE UNDER PAVED AREAS TO BE INSTALLED IN SLEEVING TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE CARRIED.

SEE LEGEND FOR TYPE. ALL WIRE UNDER PAVED AREAS TO BE INSTALLED IN A SCH. 40 SLEEVE THE SIZE REQUIRED TO EASILY PULL WIRE THROUGH. ALL SLEEVES TO BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM DEPTH AS SHOWN ON THE SLEEVING DETAILS. SLEEVES TO EXTEND AT LEAST 12" PAST THE EDGE OF THE PAVING.

11. ALL REMOTE CONTROL VALVES TO BE INSTALLED IN SHRUB OR GROUND COVER AREAS WHERE POSSIBLE.

ALL REMOTE CONTROL VALVES TO BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THE INSTALLATION DETAILS. INSTALL ALL REMOTE CONTROL VALVES WITHIN 18" OF HARDSCAPE.

12. ALL HEADS ARE TO BE INSTALLED WITH THE NOZZLE, SCREEN AND ARCS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. ALL HEADS ARE TO BE ADJUSTED TO PREVENT OVERSPRAY ONTO BUILDINGS, WALLS, FENCES AND HARDSCAPE. THIS

INCLUDES, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADJUSTMENT OF DIFFUSER PIN OR ADJUSTMENT SCREW, REPLACEMENT OF

PRESSURE COMPENSATING SCREENS, REPLACEMENT OF NOZZLES WITH MORE APPROPRIATE RADIUS UNITS AND THE REPLACEMENT OF NOZZLES WITH ADJUSTABLE ARC UNITS.

13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE PROPER GROUNDING TECHNIQUES FOR GROUNDING THE CONTROLLER AND RELATED EQUIPMENT PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS.

IRRIGATION NOTES

43.7 A 0.2 DRIP 0.81 0.25 2,579 645 17,476

43.7(0.62)= 27
27 (0.55 x 4,361)= (27)(2,399)= 64,773
MAWA= 64,773
64,773
B 0.3 BUTTON DRIP 0.81 0.37 327 121 3,278 C 1.0 POOL/SPA 1.0 1.0 1,455 1,455 39,422 4,3612,22160,176
(ON-SITE)

43.7 x 0.62 x 645=17,475.6

43.7 x 0.62 x 121=3,278.4

43.7 x 0.62 x 1,455=39,421.78
60,176
2,221
4,361

0.51 IRRIGATION NOTES

MAIN CONTROLLER SHALL BE WEATHER BASED THAT AUTOMATICALLY ADJUSTS IRRIGATION IN

RESPONSE TO CHANGES IN PLANTS' NEEDS AS WEATHER CONDITIONS CHANGE ALL PLASTIC PIPE 3" AND LESS TO BE SCH. 40 PVC.

ALL PLASTIC PIPE LARGER THAN 3" TO BE CLASS 315 PVC.

SLEEVE ALL IRRIGATION LINES UNDER PAVING W/CLASS 200 PVC SLEEVE 2-TIMES PIPE DIAMETER.

THE MAINLINE LOCATION NOTED ON PLAN IS DIAGRAMMATIC. INSTALL MAINLINE IN PLANTER AREA-TYP.

THE DESIGN ASSUMES AN OPERATING PRESSURE OF 42-PSI MINIMUM AT EACH REMOTE CONTROL VALVE.THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE EXISTING MAINLINE SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD.

PRESSURE REGULATING DEVICES ARE REQUIRED IF WATER PRESSURE IS BELOW OR EXCEEDS THE

RECOMMENDED PRESSURE OF THE SPECIFIED IRRIGATION DEVICES

MANUAL SHUTOFF VALVES SHALL BE REQUIRED AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO THE POINT OF CONNECTION

OF THE WATER SUPPLY TO MINIMIZE WATER LOSS IN CASE OF EMERGENCY OR ROUTINE REPAIR

CHECK VALVES OR ANTI-DRAIN VALVES ARE REQUIRED ON ALL SPRINKLER HEADS WHERE LOW-POINT

DRAINAGE COULD OCCUR

A DIAGRAM OF THE IRRIGATION PLAN SHOWING HYDROZONES SHALL BE KEPT WITH THE IRRIGATION

CONTROLLER FOR SUBSEQUENT MANAGEMENT PURPOSES

THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM MUST COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS.

THE IRRIGATION DESIGNER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR LANDSCAPE DESIGNER SHALL

PERFORM ONE OR MORE SITE OBSERVATIONS DURING SYSTEM INSTALLATION TO CHECK

FOR ADHERENCE TO THE DESIGN, INCLUDING THE PROPER INSTALLATION OF THE

BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLY, MAIN LINE, LATERALS, VALVES, SPRINKLER HEADS,

DRIP IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT, CONTROL WIRE, CONTROLLERS, AND SENSORS AND SHOULD ASSURE THAT THE INTENT OF THE IRRIGATION DESIGN HAS BEEN PRESERVED.

MULCHING NOTES
A MINIMUM THREE INCH (3″) LAYER OF MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED ON ALL EXPOSED SOIL

SURFACES OF PLANTING AREAS AND OVER ALL DRIPLINE TUBING EXCEPT IN TURF AREAS,

CREEPING OR ROOTING GROUNDCOVERS,OR DIRECT SEEDING APPLICATIONS WHERE MULCH IS CONTRAINDICATED.

STABILIZING MULCHING PRODUCTS SHALL BE USED ON SLOPES.

GENERAL NOTES
FOR SOILS LESS THAN 6% ORGANIC MATTER IN THE TOP 6 INCHES OF SOIL, COMPOST AT A RATE OF A MIN. OF FOUR CUBIC YARDS PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET OF PERMEABLE AREA SHALL BE INCORPORATED AT A DEPTH OF SIX INCHES INTO THE SOIL.

THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM MUST COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS.”

A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION SHALL BE FILLED OUT AND CERTIFIED BY EITHER THE SIGNER

OF THE LANDSCAPE PLANS, THE SIGNER OF THE IRRIGATION PLANS, OR THE LICENSED

LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR FOR THE PROJECT

AN IRRIGATION AUDIT REPORT SHALL BE COMPLETED AT THE TIME OF FINAL INSPECTION Preparer's Statement:

I have complied with the criteria of the ordinance and applied them for the efficient use of water in the landscape design plans.

RYAN RUSH

RME, RICHARD LUSK LANDSCAPE
LIC. C27 950714

08.18.2025
2,221
4,361

0.51 648 of 918

REMOTE CONTROL VALVE
2"x4" REDWOOD BLOCKING OR BRICK
(LENGTH AS REQUIRED)

PVC MAINLINE PIPE

UNION AND NIPPLES, TYPICAL
PVC SCH 40 ELL
HIDDEN) AND SCH 40 ELL
PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE
SCH 80 NIPPLE (2-INCH LENGTH,
PVC SCH 40 TEE OR ELL
1 CU. FT. PEA GRAVEL

PVC LATERAL PIPE
USE SCH. 40 FOR ALL PIPE AND FITTINGS FOR VALVE SIZES 1-1/2" AND BELOW.

USE CLASS 315 PVC AND SCH. 40 PVC FITTINGS FOR VALVE SIZES 2" AND LARGER.

NOTE:

FINISH GRADE
(OR EQUAL) W/ LOCKING COVER

AMATEK GREEN PLASTIC VALVE BOX
CONTROL WIRE W/ 24" EXPANSION COIL

APPROVED WIRE CONNECTORS
(1 OF 2)
ID TAG

MAINLINE PIPING
2 CU. FT. PEA GRAVEL SUMP.
2x2x12 REDWOOD BLOCK (2)
P.V.C. MALE ADAPTER (TYP.)
W/LOCKING COVER.

RECTANGULAR PLASTIC VALVE BOX
CURB, SIDEWALK, ETC.
12" MIN.

FINISH GRADE.
2"
150# PRESSURE GUAGE WITH DIAL UP

PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE
18"
FLOW
1 CU. FT CONCRETE.
18" MIN.
12" MIN.

P.V.C. SCH. 40 FITTING

MAINLINE PIPING
BRASS UNION.

BACKFLOW PREV. UNIT.

BRONZE WYE STRAINER.

BRASS NIPPLE (TYP)
BRASS ELL (TYP.)

BRASS NIPPLE LENGTH
AS REQUIRED.

CONCRETE SLAB.

FINISH GRADE
MIN. 3" LONG.

FLOW

C CONTROL VALVE

E PRESSURE REDUCING VALVEG BACKFLOW PREVENTER
CLEAN AND STRIP WIRE. CONNECT WIRES W/ A 'SCOTCH-LOC' OR EQUAL ELECTRICAL WIRE CONNECTOR. WIRES ARE TO REMAIN CLEAN AND DRY TO ENABLE SLEEVE TO PROPERLY SEAL.

POSITION SLEEVE TO APPROX. 1/4" OVER WIRE CONNECTOR (FIG. 2) PUSH CLIP OVER SLEEVE END AT EACH PAIR OF WIRES AS SHOWN.

SHRINK THE SLEEVE W/ A TORCH AT A LOW FLAME . SWEEP SLOWLY BACK AND FORTH AROUND SLEEVE UNTIL ADHESIVE FLOWS AND SEALS AROUND WIRES AT EACH CLIP.

HOLD TORCH 4-6 INCHES FROM SLEEVE, DO NOT TOUCH FLAME TO SLEEVES OR WIRES.

AVOID SCORCHING. ALLOW TO COOL FOR APPROX. 2 MINUTES.

3. 2.

1. NOTE: SLEEVES TO BE "SPLICE COAT", #DB-2358
AVAILABLE FROM:

GLOBAL SPAN PRODUCTS
P.O. BOX 145
CAMBELL, CA. 95009
(408) 379-2358

BEFOREAFTER

TWO WIRESTHREE WIRES
12 3. ALL PRESSURE MAIN LINE UNDER PAVEMENT SHALL BE BURIED A 36" MIN. DEPTH BACKFILL TO 90%, TYPICAL

WIRE W/O CONDUIT

2. FOR PIPE AND WIRE BURIAL DEPTHS SEE SPECIFICATIONS.

1. SLEEVE BELOW ALL HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS WITH CLASS 200 PVC TWICE THE HAVE BEEN MADE.

AFTER ALL CONNECTIONS
OR GREATER. UNTIE
OF DIRECTION OF 30°

ALL WIRING AT CHANGES
TIE A 24-INCH LOOP IN
NOTE:

1. PROVIDE GROUNDING ROD

AS REQUIRED BY CODE
18" MIN. DEPTH
DIAMETER OF THE PIPE OR WIRE BUNDLE WITHIN.
10-FOOT INTERVALS.

TAPE AND BUNDLE AT
AND BESIDE MAINLINE.

RUN WIRING BENEATH
NOTES:

TRENCH AS SHOWN.

BE SNAKED IN

PLASTIC PIPING TO

ALL SOLVENT WELD

THE SAME TRENCH

AND WIRING IN

MAINLINE, LATERAL,
3" 90 SWEEP ELL.

UF DIRECT BURIAL

WIRE TO CONTROL
12" MIN.

VALVE

SATURATE AND COMPACT

SECTION VIEW
PIPE

MAINLINELATERAL
PIPE

FINISH SURFACE
6"
MIN.

TYP.

CONDUIT

WIRING IN

CONTROL WIRE
3/4" CONDUIT FOR 120 V.

SERVICE W/ 2 STRANDS OF
(OPTION: WALL MOUNT TO

SCOTCH-GUARDED

WEATHER PROOF

CABINET & LOCKING

FOUR WIRES
NO. 8 WIRE

LOCAL CODEAS PER

ENCLOSURE)
3 CONNECTION

LID COVER
AUTOMATIC ELEC.

CONTROLLER W/

FINISH GRADE

POWER CONNECTION
SCOTCH-GUARD 120 V.

J-BOX

FINISH SURFACE
MIN. 1" CLEARANCE ALL AROUND.

PLASTIC PIPE SLEEVE (MIN. 4" DIA.)
2x4x12 REDWOOD BLOCK (2)
SxT MAINLINE FITTING
2 CU. FT. PEA GRAVEL SUMP

GATE VALVE
CURB, SIDEWALK, ETC.

SET BOX FLUSH WITH FINISH
ROUND PLASTIC BOX W/ LOCKING COVER.

GRADE IN LAWN AREAS; 2" ABOVE
IN PLANTING AREAS.

FINISH GRADE

I WIRE CONNECTIONJ CONTROLLERK GATE VALVEL TRENCHING Techline CV LITE END FEED LAYOUT
MF
®
®
®
D

LOW-VOLUME CONTROL ZONE ASSEMBLYH

B POINT SOURCE EMITTER

B RAIN CLIK WEATHER SENSOR
1 LEGEND:

RAIN-CLIK SENSOR
3 4

POST OR SUITABLE MOUNTING SURFACE

FINISHED GRADE
2 WALL MOUNT CONTROLLER
1 2
3 4
DATEE

HUNTER SWING JOINT
MODEL SJ-5XX-X (OPTIONAL)

LATERAL PIPE

FINISH GRADE

LATERAL TEE OR ELL
MULCH

HUNTER HVC CHECK VALVE (OPTIONAL)
HUNTER 0.25 or 0.50 GPM

PCB BUBBLER (OPTIONAL)

GRATED CAP

ROOT INTRUSION BARRIER

PATENTED STRATAROOT ASSEMBLY
NOTE: INSTALL HUNTER

FILTER FABRIC SLEEVE-
#RZWS-SLEEVE

A ROOT ZONE WATERING
SHEET
TITLE

PROJECT
TITLE
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
DATE

IRRIGATION

DETAILS
I-4

THIS PLAN DOES NOT COMMUNICATE

CONSTRUCTION MEANS OR METHODS AND

THEREFORE SHALL NOT BE USED FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR MISCONSTRUED AS A
CONSTRUCTION PLAN OR TECHNICAL DOCUMENT.

FINISH ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL

BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE
ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS.

THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN AND NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION.

IRRIGATION DETAILS
ARDEN

RESIDENCES
820 N. CENTRAL AVE.

GLENDALE, CA 91203
649 of 918

SHEET
TITLE

PROJECT
TITLE
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
DATE

IRRIGATION

SPECS &

MAINTENANCE
I-5

THIS PLAN DOES NOT COMMUNICATE

CONSTRUCTION MEANS OR METHODS AND

THEREFORE SHALL NOT BE USED FOR

CONSTRUCTION OR MISCONSTRUED AS A
CONSTRUCTION PLAN OR TECHNICAL DOCUMENT.

FINISH ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL

BE ADJUSTED AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE
ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS.

THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN AND NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION.

IRRIGATION SPECS

AND MAINTENANCE
ARDEN

RESIDENCES
820 N. CENTRAL AVE.

GLENDALE, CA 91203
650 of 918

651 of 918

CLASS 3
2 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
820 N C
ENTRAL AVE. RESIDENTIAL PROJECT
820 N Central Avenue
Glendale, CA 91203
Prepared for:

City of Glendale
Community Development Department
613 E. Broadway, Room 103
Glendale, CA 91206
Prepared by:
860
Hampshire Road, Suite P
Westlake Village, CA 91361
www.meridianconsultantsllc.com
JANUARY 2025
CC_11042025_Exhibit 2_CEQA Class 32
Categorical Exemption Findings
652 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project ii City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section Page
Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 Project Description .................................................................................................... 2 Consistency With Class 32 Criteria ................................................................................. 21 Inapplicability Of Exceptions ........................................................................................ 43 Additional Findings ................................................................................................... 45

Appendices
A Transportation Assessment
B Noise Technical Report
C Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Technical Report

List of Tables
Table Page
1 Proposed Development ...................................................................................... 7 2 Transit Services ............................................................................................. 20 3a Consistency with the City of Glendale General Plan ................................................... 22 3b Consistency with Downtown Specific Plan ............................................................... 25 4 Construction Maximum Noise Estimates ................................................................. 33 5 On-Site Construction Vibration Impacts .................................................................. 34 6 Maximum Construction Emissions ......................................................................... 36 7 Maximum Operational Emissions .......................................................................... 37 8 Localized Construction and Operational Emissions ..................................................... 37 9 Estimated Sewage Generation ............................................................................. 42 10 Estimated Solid Waste Generation ........................................................................ 43

List of Figures
Figure Page
1 Project Site Location ........................................................................................ 4 2 General Plan Land Use Map ................................................................................ 5 3 Downtown Specific Plan Land Use Map ................................................................... 6 4a North Elevation ............................................................................................... 8 653 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project iii City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
4b South Elevation ............................................................................................... 9 5a West Elevation ............................................................................................... 10 5b East Elevation ................................................................................................ 11 6 P3 Garage Plan .............................................................................................. 12 7 P2 Garage Plan .............................................................................................. 13 8 P1 Garage Plan .............................................................................................. 14 9 Ground Level Floor Plan .................................................................................... 15 10 Second Level Floor Plan .................................................................................... 16 11 Third to Eighth Level Floor Plan .......................................................................... 17 12 Mezzanine Plan .............................................................................................. 18

654 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 1 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025

INTRODUCTION
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the review of projects that involve the exercise of discretionary powers by a public agency and that could result in a physical change in the environment.

Section 15061 of the CEQA guidelines provides that once a lead agency has determined that a project is subject to CEQA, it shall next determine if that project may be exempt from CEQA.

Public Resources Code Section 21084 provides that the CEQA Guidelines shall include a list of classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment and that shall be exempt from CEQA. Article 19 of the CEQA Guidelines (Sections 15300 to 15333) sets forth the list of exemption classes. Class 32, described in Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines, consists of in -fill development projects meeting the following criteria:
• The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. • The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses.
• The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. • Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.
• The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

A project that meets these criteria for an exemption may still be subject to CEQA if one of the following exceptions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply:
• Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located - these classes are considered to not apply where the project may have an impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. • Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. • Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.
• Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state sc enic highway.
• Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. • Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. 655 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 2 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This document provides information that supports a determination that the proposed 820 North Central Avenue Residential Project (Project) meets the eligibility criteria for the Class 32 Categorical Exemption and none of the exceptions identified in CEQA Guideline Section 15300.2 apply.

Project Location
The Project Site is located at 820 North Central Avenue, 212 Arden Avenue, and 208 Arden Avenue in the City of Glendale (City), as shown in Figure 1: Project Location. The proposed Project is on the southeast corner of North Central Avenue and Arden Avenue.

Existing Conditions
The Project Site consists of three adjoining parcels, Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 5644 -003-081, 5644- 003-073, and 5644-003-003. The Project Site is approximately 36,173 square feet (sf) (0.83 acres) in size. The Project Site is currently developed and contains a one-story commercial building and surface parking lot.

Land Use and Zoning Designations
The Project Site is within downtown Glendale, within the northern portion of the Downtown Specific Plan (DSP), as shown in Figure 2: General Plan Land Use Map. The DSP area is bound on the north by Glenoaks Boulevard; on the west by Central and Columbus Avenues; on the east by Maryland and Glendale Avenues; and one block south of Colorado Boulevard. The DSP created the 11 districts based on existing building patterns within each area and the vision for each district. The Project Site is within the Gateway District and has a General Plan land use designation of Downtown Specific Plan/Gateway District, or DSP/Gateway, as shown in Figure 3: Downtown Specific Plan L and Use Map . The DSP designates the blocks between East Wilson and East Colorado Street within the East Broadway District for midrise and moderate-density residential uses.

Consistent with the land use designation DSP/Gateway, the site is zoned Downtown Specific Plan / Gateway, or DSP/Gateway. The DSP/Gateway zone allows for multiple residential dwelling units, has a standard height limit of 275 feet, and standard permitted floor-area ratio (FAR) of 7.25.

Surrounding Land Uses
The Project is in an urbanized area, as shown in Figure 1: Project Site Location. The Project Site fronts North Central Avenue and is bordered by a restaurant and a hotel to the north, a hotel to the south , commercial businesses to the west, and a multi-story parking structure to the east. 656 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 3 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
North
The area immediately north of the Project Site is developed with a restaurant including a surface parking lot. The parcels have the same land use designation as the Project Site, DSP/Gateway described in detail above.

East
The area immediately east of the Project Site includes a multi -story parking structure that provides monthly parking services for select buildings within the vicinity. These parcels contain the same land use designation as the Project Site, DSP/Gateway.

South
The area immediately south of the Project Site contains a hotel that covers the corner of North Central Avenue and Burchett Street. This p arcel has the same land use designation as the Project Site, DSP/Gateway.

West
The area immediately west of the Project Site contains commercial businesses, including a car wash service building, gasoline station, property management office, restaurant, and surface parking lot.

These parcels have the land use designation Community Services.

657 of 918

Project Site Location
FIGURE 1
SOURCE: Google Earth – 2024
405-001-23

APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET
50250 100
N
Legend
Project Site
658 of 918

General Plan Land Use Map
FIGURE 2
SOURCE: Google Earth – 2024
405-001-23

APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET
200010000 4000
N
Legend
Project Site

RESIDENTIAL
Very Low Density/Open Space
Low Density
Moderate Density
Medium Density
Medium High Density
High Density

COMMERCIAL
Neighborhood
Community Services
Regional
Glendale city boundary
PUBLIC
Public/Semi-Public
Recreation/Open Space
Industrial
Mixed Use
Cemetery
Freeways
Railroad
2 1
Specific Plan Areas
Downtown Specific Plan
Project Site
659 of 918

Downtown Specific Land Use Map
FIGURE 3
414-001-24
SOURCE: City of Glendale 2023
N
Project Site
660 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 7 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
Project Characteristics
The Project is a proposed 8-story residential building with a height of approximately 95 feet, as shown in Figure 4a-4b: North Elevation and South Elevation , and Figure 5a-5b: West Elevation and East Elevation. The building would feature eight levels containing 105 residential units, and residential amenity areas, over two levels of sub-terranean parking. The four levels of parking would contain a total of 215 vehicle parking spaces. Additionally, 6 long-term bicycle parking spaces would be provided.

Vehicular access would be along Arden Avenue, comprised of one entrance for all levels of parking , as shown in Figure 6: P3 Garage Plan, Figure 7: P2 Garage Plan, and Figure 8: P1 Garage Plan.

The 105 proposed residential units would include 1 studio unit, 37 one-bedroom units, 61 two-bedroom units, and 6 three-bedroom units. A total of 18,5 28 sf of open space, comprised of balconies, publicly accessible open space, and a pool. Of the total open space provided, 3,345 square feet would be publicly accessible open space provided on the ground level along the western boundary of the Project Site and adjacent to the public sidewalk along North Central Avenue.

Aside from the public open space, t he ground level of the new apartment building would include the lobby entrance, leasing office, a potential recreation room, the mechanical room, the pool room , and parking spaces for tenants along the northwest portion of the Project Site, as shown in Figure 9: Ground Level Floor Plan. Residential units, the pool, and pool deck would be provided on level 2, as shown in Figure 10: Second Level Floor Plan. Additional residential units on levels 3 through 8 are shown in Figure 11: Third to Eighth Level Floor Plan. The Mezzanine floor plan is shown in Figure 12. The total floor area proposed is 129,640 sf. Table 1: Proposed Development, provides a summary of the number of studio, one-bedroom, two-bedroom, and three-bedroom units proposed on the Project Site.

TABLE 1

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
STUDIO 1-BD 2-BD 3-BD TOTAL
2ND FLOOR - 5 9 1 15
3RD FLOOR - 4 10 1 15
4TH FLOOR - 4 10 1 15
5TH FLOOR - 4 10 1 15
6th FLOOR - 4 10 1 15
7th FLOOR - 4 10 1 15
8th FLOOR 1 12 2 - 15
TOTAL 1 37 61 6 105
Source: Architectural Site Plans

661 of 918

FIGURE 4a
North Elevation
405-001-23
SOURCE: Urban Design Specialists - 2023
662 of 918

FIGURE 4b
South Elevation
405-001-23
SOURCE: Urban Design Specialists - 2023
663 of 918

FIGURE 5a
West Elevation
405-001-23
SOURCE: Urban Design Specialists - 2023
664 of 918

FIGURE 5b
East Elevation
405-001-23
SOURCE: Urban Design Specialists - 2023
665 of 918

UP
UP
S
31 S
32 S
1 S
2 S
50 S
51 S
49 S
52 S
3 S
4 S
60 S
55 S
19 S
17 S
23 S
29 S
20 S
18 S
6 S
24 S
30 S
53 S
48 S
5 S
46 S
40 S
34 S
21 S
22 S
56 S
15 S
16 S
61 S
25 S
26 S
36 S
39 S
9 S
10 S
7 S
8 S
57 S
35 S
33 S
42 S
41 S
59 S
58 S
54 S
13 S
14 S
11 S
12 S
43 S
27 S
28 S
45 S
44 S
37 S
38 S
47 S62
S63
A5-1
B
A5-0
A
UP
RAMP UP TO P2
STAIR #1
ELEV #1 ELEV #2
ELEV.

LOBBY
STAIR #2
A
A
57 SF
STOR. #1
53 SF
STOR. #2
53 SF
STOR. #3
53 SF
STOR. #4 53 SF
STOR. #5
53 SF
STOR. #6
53 SF
STOR. #7
53 SF
STOR. #8 53 SF
STOR. #9
53 SF
STOR. #10
53 SF
STOR. #11
53 SF
STOR. #12
53 SF
STOR. #13
53 SF
STOR. #14 56 SF
STOR. #15
70 SF
STOR. #17
68 SF
STOR. #18
68 SF
STOR. #19
68 SF
STOR. #20
68 SF
STOR. #21 68 SF
STOR. #22
68 SF
STOR. #23
68 SF
STOR. #24 68 SF
STOR. #25
68 SF
STOR. #26

STORAGE
10 10
A.2
N. CENTRAL AVE

ARDEN AVE
FF
MECH.
68 SF
STOR. # 27
71 SF
STOR. #28
1 1
2 2
A.1
BB

1.8 2.7 4
4 4.1

5.1 5
5 3.5 3.6

3.6 6
6 6.8
7 7
8 8

8.1 8.1
9 9
DD
CC
C.1
C.3
EE
E.3
G
G
C.2

2.6 2.3 3
D.3
E.1

STORAGE
25' - 0" 18' - 0" 18' - 0" 25' - 0" 18' - 0" 18' - 0" 4' - 0" 10' - 6" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 5' - 3" 9' - 0"
1' - 0"6' - 0"8"3' - 11"18' - 0"18' - 0"25' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0" 10' - 0" 9' - 3" 10' - 0" 13' - 9" 10' - 0" 1' - 6" 23' - 1" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 9' - 7" 15' - 5" 10' - 0" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 6' - 4" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 23' - 9" 5' - 0"
3"
24' - 7" 5' - 6" 6' - 9" 28' - 11" 24' - 11" 21' - 2" 2' - 1" 22' - 6" 24' - 11" 2' - 1" 19' - 1" 2' - 1" 24' - 11" 31' - 0" 7' - 7" 20' - 3" 1' - 1" 20' - 3" 8' - 11" 9' - 1" 9' - 1" 4' - 8" 3" 30' - 1" 27' - 4" 1' - 10" 1 7' - 4" 6' - 1" 8' - 0" 2' - 1" 19' - 1" 24' - 7" 27' - 0" 10' - 6" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 6' - 10" 22' - 9" 10' - 5" 9' - 7" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 10' - 1" 1' - 6" 10' - 2" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 10" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 10' - 10" 3' - 1" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 31' - 0" 28' - 11" 28' - 9" 6' - 5" 4' - 5" 9' - 1" 7' - 9" 9' - 7"
1' - 11"
1' - 6"
10' - 6" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 2' - 9" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 23' - 1" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 3' - 8" 10' - 6"9' - 7" 0" 12' - 1" 1' - 6" 13' - 5" 10' - 0" 1' - 6" 19' - 1" 27' - 0" 25' - 6"
19' - 9" 9' - 0"

PROPERTY
241' - 4"

PROPERTY
135' - 8"
5' - 2"

BUILDING
235' - 2"
4"

PROPERTY
141' - 6"

PROPERTY
240' - 8"
4" 134' - 8" 8"
115' - 4" 119' - 10"
5' - 0"

BUILDING
235' - 2" 1' - 2"
4"

BUILDING
140' - 7" 7"

7.5%15%

STORAGE STORAGE

STORAGE
25' - 6"
18' - 4"
N
1/8" = 1'-0"
P3- GARAGE
FIGURE 6
P3 Garage Plan
405-001-23
SOURCE: Urban Design Specialists - 2023
666 of 918

UP DN
UP
DN
S
31 S
32 S
1 S
2 S
50 S
51 S
49 S
52 S
3 S
4 S
60 S
55 S
19 S
17 S
23 S
29 S
20 S
18 S
6 S
24 S
30 S
53 S
48 S
5 S
46 S
40 S
34 S
21 S
22 S
56 S
15 S
16 S
61 S
25 S
26 S
36 S
39 S
9 S
10 S
7 S
8 S
57 S
35 S
33 S
42 S
41 S
59 S
58 S
54 S
13 S
14 S
11 S
12 S
43 S
27 S
28 S
45 S
44 S
37 S
38 S
47 A5-1
B
A5-0
A
UPDN
RAMP DN. TO P3 RAMP UP TO P1
ELEV #1 ELEV #2
STAIR #2
STAIR #1
ELEV.

LOBBY
A
57 SF
STOR. #1
53 SF
STOR. #2
53 SF
STOR. #3 53 SF
STOR. #4
53 SF
STOR. #6
53 SF
STOR. #9
53 SF
STOR. #10
53 SF
STOR. #11
53 SF
STOR. #12
53 SF
STOR. #13
53 SF
STOR. #14
56 SF
STOR. #15
70 SF
STOR. #17
68 SF
STOR. #18
68 SF
STOR. #19
68 SF
STOR. #20
68 SF
STOR. #21
68 SF
STOR. #22
68 SF
STOR. #23
68 SF
STOR. #24
68 SF
STOR. #25
68 SF
STOR. #26
10 10
A.2
4"
MIN.
5' - 1"
" 0 - ' 6 " 0 - ' 1 8"126' - 0"

C O R R I D O R
N. CENTRAL AVE

ARDEN AVE
FF
68 SF
STOR. #27
71 SF
STOR. #28
1 1
2 2
A.1
BB

1.8 2.7 4
4 4.1

5.1 5
5 3.5 3.6 6
6 6.8
7 7
8 8 8.1
9 9
DD
CC
C.1
C.3
EE
E.3
GG
C.2

2.6 2.3 3
D.3

7.5%15%7.5% 15%
E.1

PROPERTY
241' - 4"

PROPERTY
135' - 8"
5' - 2"

BUILDING
235' - 2"
4"

PROPERTY
141' - 6"

PROPERTY
240' - 8"
4"

BUILDING
134' - 8" 8"
115' - 4" 119' - 10"
5' - 0"

BUILDING
235' - 2" 1' - 2"
4"

BUILDING
140' - 7" 7"
25' - 0" 18' - 0" 18' - 0" 25' - 0" 18' - 0" 18' - 0" 4' - 0" 10' - 6" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 5' - 3" 9' - 0"
1' - 0"6' - 0"8"3' - 11"18' - 0"18' - 0"25' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"11"24' - 2" 10' - 0" 9' - 3" 10' - 0" 13' - 9" 10' - 0" 1' - 6" 23' - 1" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 9' - 7" 15' - 5" 10' - 0" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 6' - 4" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 23' - 9" 5' - 0"
3"
24' - 7" 5' - 6" 6' - 9" 28' - 11" 24' - 11" 21' - 2" 2' - 1" 22' - 6" 24' - 11" 2' - 1" 19' - 1" 2' - 1" 24' - 11" 31' - 0" 7' - 7" 20' - 3" 1' - 1" 20' - 3" 8' - 11" 9' - 1" 9' - 1" 4' - 8" 3" 30' - 1" 27' - 4" 1' - 10" 1 7' - 4" 6' - 1" 8' - 0" 2' - 1" 19' - 1" 24' - 7" 27' - 0" 10' - 6" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 6' - 10" 22' - 9" 10' - 5" 9' - 7" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 10' - 1" 1' - 6" 10' - 2" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 10" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 10' - 10" 3' - 1" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 31' - 0" 28' - 11" 28' - 9" 6' - 5" 4' - 5" 9' - 1" 7' - 9" 9' - 7"
1' - 11"
1' - 6"
10' - 6" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 2' - 9" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 23' - 1" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 3' - 8" 10' - 6"9' - 7" 0" 12' - 1" 1' - 6" 13' - 5" 10' - 0" 1' - 6" 19' - 1" 27' - 0" 25' - 6"
19' - 9" 9' - 0"
149 SF
Room
226 SF
Room
474 SF
Room
232 SF

STORAGE
434 SF
Room
295 SF
Room
25' - 6"
53 SF
STOR. #5
53 SF
STOR. #8
53 SF
STOR. #7
N
1/8" = 1'-0"
P2- GARAGE
FIGURE 7
P2 Garage Plan
405-001-23
SOURCE: Urban Design Specialists - 2023
667 of 918

S
19 S
17 S
23 S
29 S
20 S
18 S
31 S
32 S
6 S
24 S
30 S
49 S
52 S
1 S
2 S
50 S
51 S
13 S
14 S
53 S
48 S
5 S
11 S
12 S
46 S
3 S
4 DN
UP
DN
S
40 S
43 S
27 S
28 S
34 S
21 S
22 S
47 S
56 S
15 S
16 S
61 S
25 S
26 S
36 S
39 S
60 S
9 S
10 S
7 S
8 S
57 S
45 S
44 S
35 S
33 S
37 S
38 S
42 S
41 S
59 S
58 S
54 S
55 UP
A5-1
B
25' - 0" 18' - 0" 18' - 0" 25' - 0" 18' - 0" 18' - 0" 4' - 0" RAMP DN. TO P2 RAMP UP TO 1ST FLOOR
STAIR #1
STAIR #2
10' - 6" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 5' - 3" 9' - 0"
TRASH
RM.ELEV.

LOBBY
ELEV #1 ELEV #2
A5-0
A

7.5% UPDN
A
57 SF
STOR. #1
53 SF
STOR. #2
53 SF
STOR. #3
53 SF
STOR. #4 53 SF
STOR. #5
53 SF
STOR. #6
53 SF
STOR. #7
53 SF
STOR. #8 53 SF
STOR. #9
53 SF
STOR. #10
53 SF
STOR. #11
53 SF
STOR. #12
53 SF
STOR. #13
53 SF
STOR. #14
56 SF
STOR. #15
70 SF
STOR. #16 68 SF
STOR. #17
68 SF
STOR. #18
68 SF
STOR. #19
68 SF
STOR. #20
68 SF
STOR. #21
68 SF
STOR. #22
68 SF
STOR. #23
68 SF
STOR. #24
68 SF
STOR. #25

C O R R I D O R
10 10
1' - 0"6' - 0"8"3' - 11"18' - 0"18' - 0"25' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"11"24' - 2" A.2

PROPERTY
241' - 4"
N. CENTRAL AVE

ARDEN AVE

PROPERTY
135' - 8"
5' - 2"

BUILDING
235' - 2"
4"

PROPERTY
141' - 6"
FF

STORAGE
68 SF
STOR. #26
71 SF
STOR. #27
15%7.5% 15%
10' - 0" 9' - 3" 10' - 0" 13' - 9" 10' - 0" 1' - 6" 23' - 1" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 9' - 7" 15' - 5" 10' - 0" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 6' - 4" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 23' - 9" MECH
1 1
2 2
A.1
BB

1.8 2.7 4
4 4.1

5.1 5
5 3.5 3.6 6
6 6.8
7 7
8 8 8.1
9 9 9.7
DD
CC
C.1
C.3
C.5
D.2
EE
E.3
G
G
5' - 0"
3"
24' - 7" 5' - 6" 6' - 9" 28' - 11" 24' - 11" 21' - 2" 2' - 1" 22' - 6" 24' - 11" 2' - 1" 19' - 1" 2' - 1" 24' - 11" 20' - 0" 5' - 6" 31' - 0" 7' - 7" 20' - 3" 1' - 1" 21' - 0" 7' - 9" 20' - 3" 8' - 11" 9' - 1" 9' - 1" 4' - 8" C.2
3" 30' - 1" 27' - 4" 1' - 10" 1 7' - 4" 6' - 1" 8' - 0" 2' - 1" 19' - 1" 24' - 7" 27' - 0"

2.6 2.3
10' - 6" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 29' - 7" 10' - 5" 9' - 7" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 10' - 1" 1' - 6" 10' - 2" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 10" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 10' - 10" 3' - 1" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 31' - 0" 28' - 11" 28' - 9" 11' - 7" 6' - 9" 6' - 5" 4' - 5" 9' - 1" 7' - 9"

PROPERTY
240' - 8"
4"

BUILDING
134' - 8" 8"
115' - 4" 119' - 10"
5' - 0"

BUILDING
235' - 2" 1' - 2"
4"

BUILDING
140' - 7" 7"
9' - 7"
1' - 11"
1' - 6"
10' - 6" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 2' - 9" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 8' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 23' - 1" 1' - 6"

STORAGE
9' - 7" 3' - 8" 10' - 6"9' - 7" 0" 12' - 1" 1' - 6" 13' - 5" 10' - 0" 1' - 6" 3 MIN.
18 BIKE ROOM

STORAGE

STORAGE
19' - 1" 27' - 0" 25' - 6"
D.3
E.1
N
1/8" = 1'-0"
P1- GARAGE
FIGURE 8
P1 Garage Plan
405-001-23
SOURCE: Urban Design Specialists - 2023
668 of 918

S
W
7 0 2
5 6 0 .8 8
WV
L=2 3 . 4 7 ' R=1 5 . 0 0 '
□ =8 9 °3 9 '0 0 "
146.35'
131.44'
M
M
M
M
S
6 S
5 S
24 S
11 S
18 S
19 S
26 S 29
S 31
S
3 S
2 DN
UP
S
16 S
17 S
22 S
9 S
8 S
7 S
10 S
20 S
21 S
23 S 30
UP
S
14 S
15 S
12 S
13 S
27 S
25 S
28 S
4 S
1 UPDN
N. CENTRAL AVE

ARDEN AVE
PL. (E)
(el. +565.18)
(el. +566.40)(el. +560.80)
(el. +560.26)
(el. +559.95)
A5-1
B

PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
(OPEN TO SKY)
3,450 S/F
6" 5' - 0" 10' - 0" 1' - 7" 5' - 0" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 8' - 0" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 23' - 1" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 9' - 7" 15' - 5" 10' - 0" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 6' - 4" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 9' - 7" 4' - 7" 10' - 0" 9' - 0" 9' - 7" 2' - 0" 12' - 0"
RAMP DN. TO P1
RAMP DN.

STAIR #1
565.00
+560' - 6"
ELEV #1 ELEV #2
(RESIDENTIAL
VAN)

ROLL OVER GATE
A5-0
A
(FOR TENANTS ONLY)
10 10

DEDICATION
6' - 2"

PROPERTY
241' - 4 1/2"
LOT
247' - 7"
LOT
146' - 4 1/4"

PROPERTY
141' - 6 1/4"

DEDICATION
4' - 10"
LOT
146' - 4"PROPERTY
135' - 8"

DEDICATION
10' - 9"
E.2
F

TRANSFORMER

ELECTRICAL
1' - 6" 23' - 1" 1' - 6"

POOL ROOM
560' - 6"

EXIT ACCESS DISCHARGE

M A I L BOX
LOBBY

CONCIERGE
STAIR#2
REC. ROOM
2,600 S/F
1 1
2 2
18' - 0"
10' - 5" 9' - 7" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 2' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 10" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 11' - 4" 2' - 6" 9' - 7" A.1
BB

1.8 4
4 4.1

5.1 5
5 3.5 6
6 6.8
7 7
8 8 8.1
9 9 9.1 9.7
DD
CC
C.1
C.3
C.5
D.2
EE
E.3
G
C.2

2.6 2.3
24' - 7" 5' - 6" 6' - 9" 28' - 11" 24' - 11" 21' - 2" 2' - 1" 22' - 6" 24' - 11" 2' - 1" 19' - 1" 2' - 1" 24' - 11" 3' - 10" 1 6' - 2" 5' - 6" 12' - 1" 8' - 2" 1' - 1" 21' - 0" 7' - 9" 20' - 3" 8' - 11" 9' - 1" 9' - 1" 3' - 5"

BUILDING
131' - 11"4"

POOL ABOVE
SPA
ABOVE
12' - 0"

STORAGE
31' - 0" 28' - 11" 28' - 9" 11' - 7" 6' - 9" 6' - 5" 4' - 5" 9' - 1" 5' - 0" 30' - 1" 27' - 4" 8' - 4" 10' - 10" 1 4' - 1" 2' - 1" 19' - 1" 24' - 7" 27' - 0" 19' - 1" 27' - 0" 25' - 6" CANOPY
3' - 0"

BUILDING
236' - 7" 4"

DEDICATION
6' - 9 3/4"

PROPERTY
240' - 8 1/4"
LOT
247' - 6"
1' - 6" 9' - 7" 2' - 6" 9' - 7" 1' - 6" 13' - 5" 10' - 0" 1' - 6" 18' - 5" 5' - 3" CANOPY
3' - 0" 231' - 10" 4' - 9" 1' - 2"
34' - 1"
CANOPY
3' - 0"

BUILDING
101' - 0"
CANOPY
3' - 0"
3 3

APARTMENT AMENITY / LEASING CENTER

PACKAGE
PL.

PL. (N)
4' - 0"

STORAGE / MECH
(FOR TENANTS ONLY)
D.3
PL. (E)
PL. (N)
E.1
560' - 6"
-
N
1/8" = 1'-0"
1ST FLOOR
FIGURE 9
Ground Level Floor Plan
405-001-23
SOURCE: Urban Design Specialists - 2023
669 of 918

DN
UP
UPDN
DN
A5-1
B
A5-0
A
E.2
N. CENTRAL AVE

ARDEN AVE

OPEN TO BELOW

POOL DECK
8,900 S/F
718 SF
1-BD
214
704 SF
1-BD
213
1,121 SF
2-BD
211
1,112 SF
2-BD
212

POOLSPA

WALK-IN
CL.

BATH
BEDRM
KIT.

LIV.

W/D
KIT.

BATH
#1
BATH
#2
BDRM
#2
BDRM
#1
DIN. LIV.

BEDRM
CL. W/D
BATH
KIT.

BATH
#1
BATH
#2
KIT. DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH
#1
BATH
#2
KIT.DIN.LIV.BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

CL.

W/DCOAT
CL.

BATH
#1
BATH
#2
KIT. DIN.

LIV. BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

CL.

W/DCOAT
CL.

BATH
#1
BATH
#2
KIT.DIN.LIV.BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH
#2
KIT. DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/D
BATH
#1
BDRM
#1
CL.

CL.

BATH
#2
KIT.DIN. LIV.

BDRM #
2 WALK-IN
CL.

W/D
COAT
BATH
#1
BDRM
#1
CL.

CL.

BATH
#2
KIT.DIN. LIV.

BDRM
#2
WALK-IN CL.

W/D
BATH
#1

BDRM
#1

BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY

BDRM BATH

BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY
DIN.

BDRM

WALK-IN
CL
BATH
TRASH
LOBBY
KIT.

LIV.

W/D
CHUTE

C O R R I D O R
STAIR#1
STAIR#1
KIT.

BATH #1
DIN.

WALK-IN CL.

LIV.

BDRM
#1
ELEV #1
1,112 SF
2-BD
210
1,109 SF
2-BD
208
1,109 SF
2-BD
206
1,323 SF
3-BD
201
747 SF
1-BD
203
1,157 SF
2-BD
204
685 SF
1-BD
205
1,137 SF
2-BD
207
1,119 SF
2-BD
209 1,069 SF
2-BD
215
861 SF
1-BD
202
UNIT
42' - 8"
UNIT
27' - 10"
UNIT
31' - 10"

C O R R I D O R
CL
W/D
6' - 0"
W/D
CL. WALK-IN
CL.
1 1
2 2
WALK-IN CL.

WALK-IN
CL
DIN.

LIV.

KIT.

BALCONY

WALK-IN
CL
ELEV #2
BDRM
#2
LIV.

DIN.

LIV.

KIT.

BATH
#1
BATH
#2
BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2
DIN.

LIV DIN
DIN.

WALK-IN
CL

BALCONY
CL
W/D
A.1
BB

1.8 4
4 4.1 5.1

5.1 5
5 3.5 6
6 6.8

6.8 7
7 8
8 8.1 9 9.1

9.7 9.7
DD
CC
C.1
C.3
C.5
D.2
EE
E.3
C.2

2.6 2.3 3
UNIT
41' - 3"
UNIT
29' - 8"
UNIT
34' - 6"
UNIT
35' - 4"
UNIT
35' - 4"
UNIT
25' - 5"
UNIT
32' - 5"
UNIT
42' - 3"
UNIT
35' - 0"
BDRM
#1
BATH
#2
BATH
#1
2' - 11"

BUILDING
77' - 3"

POOL DECK
55' - 6"
2' - 1"

BUILDING
233' - 11" 5' - 4"
W/D
BATH
#2
CL
KIT
PL.
19' - 2"
18' - 0"
80' - 0"
9' - 0"
7' - 0"

P O O L F E N C E

P O O L F E N C E
2' - 1"

BUILDING
102' - 4"37' - 1"
D.3

COAT COAT
W/D

CANOPY BELOW

CANOPY BELOW
N
1/8" = 1'-0"
2ND FLOOR
FIGURE 10
Second Level Floor Plan
405-001-23
SOURCE: Urban Design Specialists - 2023
670 of 918

UP
DN
UP DN
A5-1
B
A5-0
A
E.2
1,069 SF
2-BD
315
718 SF
1-BD
314
1,121 SF
2-BD
311
1,001 SF
2-BD
305
747 SF
1-BD
302
1,157 SF
2-BD
303
1,323 SF
3-BD
301
1,112 SF
2-BD
312
704 SF
1-BD
313
1,112 SF
2-BD
310
1,119 SF
2-BD
309
1,109 SF
2-BD
308
1,137 SF
2-BD
307
1,109 SF
2-BD
306
685 SF
1-BD
304
TV
ELEV #1 ELEV #2
KIT.
1 1
2 2
A.1
BB

1.8 4
4 4.1 5.1

5.1 5
5 3.5 6
6 6.8

6.8 7
7 8
8 8.1

8.1 9
9 9.1

9.1 9.7

9.7 DD
CC
C.1
C.3
C.5
D.2
EE
E.3
C.2

2.6 2.3
3 3
UNIT
42' - 8"
UNIT
27' - 10"
UNIT
31' - 4"
UNIT
40' - 9"
UNIT
29' - 8"
UNIT
34' - 6"
UNIT
35' - 4"
UNIT
35' - 4"
UNIT
25' - 5"
UNIT
32' - 5"
2' - 7"

BUILDING
233' - 5" 5' - 4"

WALK-IN
CL.

BATH
BEDRM
KIT.

LIV.

W/D
KIT.

BATH
#1
BATH
#2
BDRM
#2
BDRM
#1
DIN. LIV.

BEDRM
CL. W/D
BATH
KIT.

BATH
#1
BATH
#2
KIT. DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH
#1
BATH
#2
KIT.DIN.LIV.BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH
#1 BATH
#2
KIT. DIN.

LIV. BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH
#1
BATH
#2
KIT.DIN.LIV.BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH
#2
KIT. DIN.

LIV.

BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL.

W/DCOAT
BATH
#1
BDRM
#1
BATH
#2
KIT.DIN. LIV.

BDRM #
2 WALK-IN
CL.

W/D
COAT
BATH
#1
BDRM
#1
BATH
#2
KIT.DIN. LIV.

BDRM
#2
WALK-IN CL.

W/D
COAT
BATH
#1
BDRM
#1

BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY BALCONY

BDRM BATH

BALCONY BALC ONY BALCONY
DIN.

BDRM

WALK-IN
CL
BATH
TRASH
LOBBY
KIT.

LIV.

W/D
CHUTE

C O R R I D O R
STAIR#1
STAIR#1
KIT.

BATH
#1
DIN.

WALK-IN CL.

LIV. BDRM
#1

C O R R I D O R
CL
W/D
W/D
CL. WALK-IN
CL.

WALK-IN CL.

WALK-IN
CL
DIN.

LIV.

KIT.

BALCONY

WALK-IN
CL
BDRM
#2
LIV.

DIN.

LIV.

KIT.

BATH
#1
BATH
#2
BDRM
#1
BDRM
#2
DIN.

LIV DIN
DIN.

WALK-IN
CL

BALCONY
CL
W/D
BDRM
#1
BATH
#2
BATH
#1
W/D
BDRM
#2

WALK-IN
CL
CL.

UNIT
42' - 3"
UNIT
35' - 0"

BUILDING
233' - 9"
UNIT
35' - 8"
UNIT
35' - 4"
UNIT
35' - 4"
UNIT
35' - 4"
UNIT
35' - 4"
UNIT
22' - 0"
UNIT
34' - 9"
KIT.

PL.

WALK-IN CL.

N. CENTRAL AVE

ARDEN AVE
55' - 6"

BUILDING
77' - 3" 2' - 11"
D.3
2' - 7"

BUILDING
101' - 10"37' - 1"
W/D
WALK-IN CL.

WALK-IN CL.

N
1/8" = 1'-0"
3RD FLOOR
FIGURE 11
Third to Eighth Level Floor Plan
405-001-23
SOURCE: Urban Design Specialists - 2023
671 of 918

DN
DN

DN DNDNDN

DN DN DN DN
A5-1
B
A5-0
A

LOFT LOFT LOFT LOFT

WALK-IN
CL

B A L C O N Y

LOWER ROOF
LOFT

LOFT WALK-IN

CL WALK-IN
CL
BATHRM
#2
BATHRM
#2

LOWER ROOF
LOFT
25' - 1"
LOFT
35' - 4"
LOFT
35' - 4"
LOFT
25' - 10"
LOFT
25' - 1"
LOFT
35' - 4"
LOFT
35' - 4"
LOFT
25' - 10"

LOWER ROOF
73' - 10"

BUILDING
121' - 7"

LOWER ROOF
31' - 7"

LOWER ROOF
73' - 10"

BUILDING
121' - 7"

LOWER ROOF
31' - 7"
LOFT
29' - 5"
LOFT
29' - 5"
STAIR #2
STAIR #1
PL.

N. CENTRAL AVE

ARDEN AVE
ELEVATORS 1, 2

WALK-IN
CL

WALK-IN
CL
6' - 0"
4' - 1"

LOWER ROOF
85' - 10"51' - 7"
9' - 5"

LOWER ROOF
64' - 10"61' - 5"
3' - 0"3' - 0"

CANOPYCANOPYCANOPYCANOPYCANOPYCANOPY

CANOPY CANOPY

CANOPY CANOPY CANOPY CANOPY

CANOPYCANOPY
CANOPY

GUARD RAIL

GUARD RAIL
N
1/8" = 1'-0"

MEZZANINE
FIGURE 12
Mezzanine Plan
405-001-23
SOURCE: Urban Design Specialists - 2023
672 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 19 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
Construction
The Project would be built over a 36- month period, with an estimated start in January 2026 and estimated completion in January 2029, and would include the following phases: (1) demolition debris, including removal of paved areas, which would occur over approximately 2 weeks (2) grading and excavation, which would take approximately 6 months, (3) building construction and foundation work, occurring over approximately 18 months, (4) paving, which would take approximately 6 months, and (5) architectural coatings, which would take approximately 6 months.

Access and Transit
The Project Site fronts North Central Avenue, which is a designated major arterial that travels in a generally north-south direction which consists of generally three lanes in each direction, including a bike lane, and left-turn lanes. Street parking is not provided. Nearby roadways include Glenoaks Boulevard to the north, Burchette Street to the south, North Columbus Avenue to the west, and Brand Boulevard to the east. Regional access to the Project Site is provided by the Ventura Freeway, or California State Route (SR) 134, approximately 0.13 miles south of the Project Site, running in a generally east to west direction, California State Route 2, or SR-2, approximately 1.91 miles east of the Project Site travelling in a generally north-south direction, and Interstate 5, or I-5, approximately 1.96 miles west of the Project Site, also travelling in a generally north-south direction.

The nearest bus stop to the Project Site is located on the southeast corner of North Central Avenue and Arden Avenue, fronting the Project Site. Transit service provided within a ¼ mile radius of the Project Site is identified in Table 2: Transit Services, shown below.

All routes serving the Project Site make a stop at the Glendale Transportation Center (GTC), which provides access to the greater Los Angeles Metropolitan region via bus and commuter trains. The GTC also provides Statewide access via Amtrak long -distance trains. The GTC is located approximately 2.5 miles south of the Project Site and is accessible via South Central Avenue.

The proposed LA Metro North Hollywood to Pasadena Bus Rapid Transit Corridor will connect the cities of Los Angeles, Burbank, Glendale, and Pasadena and includes proposed stops within a half mile of the Project Site. Stops are proposed at Glenoaks Boulevard and Pacific Avenue, approximately 0.4 miles to the northwest of the Project Site, and at Lexington Drive and Central Avenue, approximately 0.4 miles south of the Project Site.

673 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 20 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
TABLE 2

TRANSIT SERVICES
Route Number Bus Stop Location Service Days Service Hours Headway 1, Glendale
Beeline North Central & Arden Monday – Friday,
Saturday - Sunday
6:00 AM –
7:45 PM, 9:00
AM – 6:00 PM
10 Minutes
92, LA Metro Glendale & Broadway Monday - Friday 5:33 AM – 4:44 AM 20 Minutes
549, LADOT Transit Goode & Brand Monday – Friday 6:40 AM – 7:02 PM 20 Minutes
11, Glendale
Beeline Brand & Arden Monday – Friday
6:00 AM –
9:30 AM, 2:30
PM – 6:30 PM
20 Minutes
Source: LA Metro, Glendale Beeline, LADOT Transit

Approval Actions
For the Project to be implemented, the City of Glendale would need the following discretionary actions:

Design Review
The City of Glendale Community Development Department has a multi -stage design review process for proposed projects. Approval of Stage I and II Design is being requested at this time. The design of the Project is subject to the City of Glendale Design Guidelines; the City of Glendale Downtown Specific Plan Design Guidelines.

674 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 21 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
CONSISTENCY WITH CLASS 32 EXEMPTION CRITERIA
As discussed below, the Project meets all of the criteria for the Class 32 Exemption. (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations.

The Project Site is located within the Gateway District as defined by the Glendale Downtown Specific Plan. The proposed Project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Downtown Specific Plan to concentrate growth in downtown and redevelop underutilized property to provide additional housing opportunities near employment opportunities, public facilities, and goods and services. The proposed Project is an 8 -story, 105- unit residential apartment building and therefore is consistent with the Gateway DSP which is characterized by high -rise development and encourages residential buil dings, as well as corporate headquarters, new hotels, mixed-use buildings, complementary/accessory service and retail businesses, and appropriate night-time entertainment uses. Chapter 1 in the DSP outlines the goals and polices for physical standards, guidelines, and land use regulations for activities within the DSP Planning Area, including providing incentives for a wide range of downtown housing types and concentrating growth in the downtown area to develop a transit -rich entertainment, employment, and cultural center.

The DSP identifies height and floor area standards to define the allowed density in each district. As mentioned previously, the Project Site is located within the Gateway District of the DSP which permits new development to have a maximum height of 275 feet and FAR of 7.25 by right.

The Project’s consistency with the City’s General Plan is addressed on the following page in Table 3:

Consistency With the City of Glendale General Plan . The Project would be consistent with the applicable policies of the City’s General Plan.

The population of the City reached 191,719 in 2010 and has increased to 196,543 by 2020. 1 The current
estimated population for the entire City is approximately 189,221 people in 2022.2 Estimated population projections from the U.S. Census Bureau for the year 2023 has not been published at this moment. SCAG

1 U.S. Census Bureau. Glendale city, California. Accessed April 2024. https://data.census.gov/table/DECENNIALPL2020.P1?g=160XX00US0630000. 2 U.S. Census Bureau. “Glendale city, California.” Quick Facts. Accessed April 2024. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/glendalecitycalifornia,US/PST045221#:~:text=Glendale%20city%2C%20Califo rnia%20United%20States%20Population%20estimates%2C%20July,2023%2C%20%28V2023%29%20%EE%A1%80%20%EE%A0%BF%20N A%20%EE%A1%80%20%EE%A0%BF%20334%2C914%2C895.
675 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 22 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
has forecasted that the City will grow to a population of 220,276 by 2050, an increase of approximately 31,055 people.3
TABLE 3A

CONSISTENCY WITH THE CITY OF GLENDALE GENERAL PLAN
Goals and Policies Project Consistency
Land Use Element
General
Form an urban environment which will provide
for residential diversity and opportunity.

Consistent. The Project would provide 105 new
residential units within the Downtown Specific
Plan/Gateway District (DSP Gateway), which
encourages a live-work environment consisting of
mixed-use and residential buildings, hotels, and
other uses.

Improve the livability of the total community for
all Glendale residents as expressed in living,
working and shopping areas, as well as
community facilities.

Consistent. The Project would provide 105 new
residential units within the DSP Gateway,
contributing to the development of a live-work
environment.

Promote development and improvement within
the community capitalizing on the location of,
and access to, Glendale as adjacent to the
regional core.

Consistent. The Project would provide 105 new
residential units within the DSP Gateway, which
is regionally accessible by the Ventura Freeway
(134 Freeway) 0.12 miles south of the Project
Site.

Residential
Promote the revitalization or, if necessary, the
replacement of deteriorating neighborhoods.

Consistent. The Project is proposed on three
parcels consisting of an existing surface parking
lot and a one-story commercial building, and
would provide 105 new residential buildings,
including 3,345 square feet (sf) of publicly
accessible open space and 15,183 sf of private
open space.

Safeguard residential neighborhoods from
intrusion of incompatible and disruptive uses.

Consistent. The Project Site has a General Plan
land use designation of DSP/Gateway and is
zoned DSP/Gateway. The neighborhood is
urbanized and contains uses similar to and
compatible with the Project.

Support the creation of higher density residential
development and alternative forms of medium
and high density housing in those areas best
suited from the standpoint of accessibility,
Consistent. The Project would provide 105 new
residential units and is located within the
DSP/Gateway District which is characterized by
high-rise development and a live-work

3 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). “Technical Reports: Demographics & Growth Forecast.” Final Connect SoCal 2024. Accessed May 2024. https://scag.ca.gov/connect-socal. 676 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 23 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
current development, community organization,
transportation and circulation facilities and
economic feasibility.
environment.

Provide opportunities for a diversity in housing
styles for all economic segments of the
community.

Consistent. The Project is located along North
Central Avenue and Arden Avenue, bordered by
commercial uses to the north and west, multi-
story hotels to the south and northeast, and a
multi-story parking structure to the east, and
would provide 105 new residential units,
including public/private open space.

Community Facilities
Promote the development of parks and other
recreational facilities in accordance with the
adopted plan.

Consistent. The Project would construct a
residential apartment building, including 3,345
square feet (sf) of publicly accessible open space
and 15,183 sf of private open space, enhancing
pedestrian activity and experience in the City.

Housing Element
Goal 1: A city with a ride range of housing types to meet the needs of current and future residents.

Policy 1.1: Provide a variety of residential
development opportunities in the City through
the zoning of sufficient land with a range of
densities.

Consistent. The Project would provide 105 new
residential units on two parcels consisting of an
existing surface parking lot and a one-story
commercial building.

Policy 1.2: Maintain adequate capacity to
accommodate the City’s unmet Regional Housing
Needs Allocation (RHNA) for all income
categories throughout the planning period.

Consistent. The overall increase of 105 housing
units through the proposed Project would not
exceed the SCAG forecasted addition of 8,600
households in the City between 2019 and 2050.

The Housing Element identifies that the City has
a RHNA total of 13,425 units. After credits are
applied for projects that are approved/entitled
but not yet built or under construction, the City’s
RHNA is 12,053. The Project site has a RHNA of
58 moderate-income units and 58 above
moderate-income units for total of 116 units. The
Project’s 105 units would be market-rate,
affordable to above moderate-income
households, and would accommodate the 58
above moderate-income RHNA for the site. The
Project would provide an in lieu fee for the 58
moderate-income units. Together with projects
under construction, the conversion of existing
multifamily units to deed-restricted affordable
units, and projects approved/entitled but not yet
built, the City has exceeded its RHNA by 1,060
units, an 8% overall surplus. This includes a
surplus of 203 lower-income units, 94 moderate-
income units, and 763 above moderate-income
units. The City has the ability to adequately
accommodate the remaining RHNA at all income
levels with the proposed Project.
677 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 24 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
Policy 1.4: Encourage higher density residential
development in proximity to public
transportation, jobs, services, and activity
centers
Consistent. The Project would provide 105 new
residential units and is within the DSP/Gateway
District, consisting of mixed-use residential and
commercial uses, and located within a quarter-
mile of multiple public transit stops.

Goal 2: A city with high quality residential neighborhoods that are attractive and well designed.

Policy 2.1: Retain the positive characteristics of
existing neighborhoods.

Consistent. The Project Site is located on North
Central Avenue and Arden Avenue, within an
urbanized neighborhood containing similar uses
to and compatible with the Project.

Policy 2.8: Ensure the variety and visual appeal
of residential development in Glendale through
the Design Review process.

Consistent. The Project Site would be designed in
accordance with the Design Review process and
applicable zoning standards.

Policy 2.9: Respect scale, historic continuity, and
a sense of community in new residential
development.

Consistent. The Project Site would provide 105
new residential units, including 3,345 sf of public
open space and 15,183 sf of private open space,
supporting community benefit and residential
amenities.

Goal 6: A city with housing that is livable and sustainable.

Policy 6.3: Implement recommendations of the
Open Space and Conservation Element and the
Recreation Element of the General Plan to ensure
an adequate amount of public open space and
developed parkland for the needs of new and
existing residential development.

Consistent. The Project would construct a new
residential apartment building, including public
and private open space, which would contribute
to the network of open spaces within the
DSP/Gateway District.

Policy 6.4: Implement zoning standards that
require adequate on-site open space and
recreational amenities in new developments, as
feasible based on project size.

Consistent. The Project would be consistent with
the General Plan land use designation and
designed in accordance with the applicable
zoning standards for on-site open space and
recreational amenities.

Policy 6.10: Encourage the use of sustainable
building practices in residential developments.

Consistent. The Project would comply with the
Greener Glendale Plan and would replace
outdated structures with new construction
designed in accordance with applicable energy,
water, and waste efficiency measures.

Policy 6.11: Provide opportunities for residential
locations and design that encourage transit,
pedestrian, bicycle, and other mobility options.

Consistent. The Project is located on North
Central Avenue within the DSP/Gateway District,
consisting of mixed-use residential and
commercial uses, and within ¼-mile of various
public transit stops.

Circulation Element
Goal 3: Reasonable access to services and goods in Glendale by a variety of transportation modes.

Encourage the growth in areas and in patterns
which are or can be well served by public
transportation.

Consistent. The Project would provide 105 new
residential units within the DSP/Gateway
District, consisting of mixed-use residential and
commercial uses, and within ¼ mile of various
678 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 25 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
public transit stops.

Encourage housing around and in commercial
centers.

Consistent. The Project would provide 105 new
residential units within the DSP/Gateway
District, which is consists of numerous corporate
headquarters and businesses.

Goal 4: Functional and safe streetscapes that are aesthetically pleasing for both pedestrian and vehicular traffic.

Provide and maintain quality streetscape and
pedestrian amenities (i.e. bus shelters, street
trees, street furniture, wide sidewalks, etc.)
Consistent. The Project Site would be designed in
accordance with applicable zoning standards and
would construct a residential apartment building,
including a total of 18,528 sf of public and
private open space, enhancing pedestrian activity
and experience in the City.

Open Space and Conservation Element
Policy 2: The City shall provide a variety of
outdoor recreational opportunities to all
residents.

Consistent. The Project would provide a new
residential apartment building, including a total
of 18,528 sf of public and private open space to
benefit residents and the community.

Noise Element
Goal 3: Continue incorporating noise considerations into land use planning decisions.

Policy 3.1: Ensure that land uses comply with
adopted standards.

Consistent. The Project would be consistent with
the General Plan land use designation and
designed in accordance with the applicable
zoning standards.

TABLE 3B

CONSISTENCY WITH DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
Goals and Policies Project Consistency
Land Use

3.1.1 Downtown Districts and Complementary
Land Use Options: Include many land use options
to encourage healthy urban districts with
opportunities for interaction between uses.

Direct certain land uses to specific areas to
reduce potential land use conflicts such as noise
or parking demand, while encouraging those land
uses which enhance the attractiveness and
convenience of the primary downtown land uses
such as offices and residential use.

Consistent. The Project would be consistent with
the General Plan land use designation and would
provide 105 new residential units, including
public/private open space amenities, enhancing
pedestrian experience and contributing to the
livability and general amenity of the
DSP/Gateway District.

3.1.2 The 24-Hour Downtown: Encourage
appropriate land uses that extend the life of
Consistent. The Project would provide 105 new
residential units and is within the DSP/Gateway
679 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 26 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
Downtown into the evenings and weekends so
that daytime, weekend, and nighttime uses can
support each other and share parking seven days
a week. Such uses can contribute to the vitality
of the downtown area and the viability of
downtown businesses.

District, consisting of mixed-use and residential
buildings, hotels, and retail businesses at the
street level.

Urban Design

4.0.1 Downtown Character and Image: New
development shall enhance the overall image of
the Downtown as an enticing destination for
visitors and Glendale residents. Development
should reflect the pattern of uses, height, and
density envisioned by the DSP, as discussed in
Chapter Two for each Downtown district.

Consistent. The Project would construct a
residential apartment building, including
public/private open space, enhancing pedestrian
activity and experience in the City, and would be
designed in accordance with the applicable
development code standards envisioned for the
DSP/Gateway District.

4.0.2 Context Sensitive Design: New development
shall be sensitive to existing patterns and
character in Downtown. Where strong existing
patterns of height, scale or use are established,
new development should reinforce these
patterns.

Consistent. The Project would provide a new
residential apartment building, including
public/private open space, within an existing
urbanized neighborhood containing similar uses
to and compatible with the Project. The Project
would be designed in accordance with the
applicable zoning standards.

4.0.8 Building Heights and Downtown District
Character: Building heights in Downtown should
be regulated to create transitions from lower
density neighborhoods surrounding Downtown,
and to provide a consistent scale within various
Downtown districts. While Community Benefit
may permit maximum building heights or
allowable FAR, they should not produce buildings
which are out of character with the surrounding
neighborhoods unless the building fulfills the
goals of the individual Downtown district.

Consistent. The Project would be designed in
accordance with the applicable zoning standards
envisioned for the DSP/Gateway District. The
neighborhood contains similar uses to and
compatible with the proposed Project.

4.0.9 Pedestrian and Open Space Network: New
development shall enhance pedestrian activity by
improving the physical attractiveness of the
street and providing places for relaxation,
shopping, living, and dining. The pedestrian
experience is enhanced through the pedestrian
framework of streets and open spaces (e.g.,
parks, plazas, paseos, and courtyards) that shape
the pedestrian experience in Downtown and
reinforce the distinct street typology.

Open Space

5.1.2 Walking Distance: Provide public open
space within walking distance of all Downtown
residents and employees.

Consistent. The Project would provide 3,345 sf of
publicly accessible open space, contributing to
the network of Downtown open spaces that
enhance the downtown environment for all
residents, visitors, and those employed within
the City.
680 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 27 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025

5.1.4 Excellent Design: Make the new public
parks, plazas and courtyards harmonious,
inspirational, and sources of community pride
and identity through design excellence.

Consistent. The Project would provide a new
residential building, including public/private
open space, which would provide a community
benefit and enhance the experience and livability
of the DSP/Gateway District.

5.1.6 Smaller Open Spaces: Pursue opportunities
to enhance existing and create new smaller open
spaces. These smaller spaces can include public
plazas, courtyards, and pocket parks, on portions
of blocks throughout Downtown to supplement
the larger public open spaces, provide local focus
points, and diversify the built environment.

Consistent. The Project would provide 18,528 sf
of public and private open space which would
contribute to the network of open spaces within
Downtown.

5.1.7 Green Streets: Focus on excellent urban
design to improve Downtown streets as an
essential element of the open space system as
tree-lined open spaces and continuous
recreational paths.

Consistent. The Project would provide 18,528 sf
of public and private open space and would be
designed with the applicable zoning standards,
contributing the Downtown’s network of open
spaces.

5.1.8 Private Open Space: Require private
common open space as part of all large new
residential and mixed-use developments.

Consistent. The Project would provide a total of
15,183 sf of private open space on the 5th floor
sundeck and the balconies provided on various
floors.

Mobility

6.1.2 Land Use and Transit: A. Link land use and
transit development policies to maximize transit
use and convenience in Downtown.

Consistent. The Project is within the
DSP/Gateway District, consisting of mixed-use
and residential uses, and located less than ¼
mile of various public transit stops which
maximize the accessibility, safety, and efficiency
of transportation within downtown.

6.1.3 Multi-Modal Future: B. Through sound land
use and transportation planning, emphasize
diversifying modal choices, increasing number of
downtown trips by transit, bicycle, and on foot,
and improving pedestrian comfort and safety.

Consistent. The Project Site within the
DSP/Gateway District, consisting of mixed-use
residential and commercial uses, and is located
less than ¼ mile distance from public transit
stops, providing multimodal transportation
options for residents for various services and
amenities.

6.1.4 Encourage Bicycle Travel: B. Include
bicycle parking, showers, and lockers to promote
bicycle commuting in new development.

Consistent. The Project would provide 6 long-
term bicycle parking spaces.

6.1.5 Encourage Pedestrian Activity: A. Provide a
high level of pedestrian amenities throughout the
downtown area. Minimize interruptions, such as
areas for loading and trash collection, and
parking garage entries, in sidewalks designated
for pedestrian priority.

Consistent. The Project would not introduce
unusual or incompatible elements that would
increase impediments or hazards to pedestrian
movement, and would be designed according to
applicable development code standards.

6.1.6 Parking Management: D. Require a certain
portion of on-site parking for motorcycle,
bicycle, and carpool/carshare vehicle parking in
addition to automobile spaces.

Consistent. The Project would provide 6 long-
term bicycle parking spaces, as well as 215
vehicle parking spaces.
681 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 28 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
For these reasons, the proposed Project is consistent with the applicable development standards for this area and would meet this criterion of the Class 32 Exemption. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially
surrounded by urban uses.

The Project Site is approximately 0.83 acres. The Project Site is surrounded by restaurants and a hotel to the north, a hotel to the south, commercial businesses to the west, and multi-story parking structure to the east, within Downtown Glendale. The proposed Project is within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres that is substantially surrounded by urban uses. Therefore, the Project satisfies this criterion of the Class 32 Exemption.
(c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species.

The proposed Project consists of the development of a new residential building with 105 dwelling units , on three parcels currently developed with surface parking lots and a commercial building. There are existing street trees along Arden Avenue. Existing trees on the Project Site consist of ornamental trees that part of the landscaping.

The Project site does not contain any critical habitat, including wetlands, nor is it known to support any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) or US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). The Project site is not part of any draft or adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservat ion plan. 4 Due to the highly developed surroundings, there are no wildlife corridors through the proposed Project site or native nursery sites on the Project site. For these reasons, the Project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. Therefore, the Project satisfies this criterion of the Class 32 Exemption.
(d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.

Tra nsportation
The City of Glendale has established significance criteria for transportation impacts consistent with OPR guidance. Applicable thresholds include whether the project would (1) conflict with a program, plan,

4 California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). National Community Conservation Planning (NCCP) Plan Summaries.

Accessed March 2024. https://wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Planning/NCCP/Plans. 682 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 29 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadways, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities; (2) conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)(1); or (3) substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design features or incompatible uses. A Transportation Assessment was prepared in accordance with the requirements of the City to analyze and evaluate potential transportation impacts. The Transportation Assessment is included as Appendix A to these findings.

Access to the Project Site will be provided by one driveway which has a width of 25-feet. Pedestrian access will be provided along Central Avenue, and pedestrian access and vehicular access to the Project Site is separated with clear pedestrian and vehicular pathways for promoting a safe and comfortable environment. Furthermore, all emergency ingress/egress associated with the Project would be designed and constructed in conformance with all applicable City Building and Safety D ivision, the City’s General Plan, and the Downtown Specific Plan standards and requirements for design and construction.

The Project is approximately 2. 5 miles north of the Glendale Transportation Center and within one- quarter mile of bus stops located on the southeast corner of North Central Avenue and Arden Avenue, fronting the Project Site. Transit service provided within a one-quarter mile radius of the Project Site is identified in Table 2: Transit Services. The proposed LA Metro North Hollywood to Pasadena Bus Rapid Transit Corridor will connect the cities of Los Angeles, Burbank, Glendale, and Pasadena and includes proposed stops within a half mile of the Project Site . Stops are proposed at Glenoaks Boulevard and Pacific Avenue, approximately 0.4 miles to the northwest of the Project Site, and at Lexington Drive and Central Avenue, approximately 0.4 miles south of the Project Site.

The Project Site fronts North Central Avenue, which is a designated major arterial in the city’s Circulation Element that travels in a generally north -south direction, consisting of two to three lanes in each direction, including a bike lane and left-turn lanes. Street parking is not provided. Regional access to the Project Site is provided by the Ventura Freeway, or 134 Freeway, approximately 0.13 miles south of the Project Site, running in a generally east to west direction, California State Route 2, or S R-2, approximately 1.91 miles east of the Project Site travelling in a generally north -south direction, and Interstate 5 Freeway, or I -5, approximately 1.96 miles west of the Project Site, also travelling in a generally north-south direction. The nearest bust stop to the Project Site is located on the southeast corner of North Central Avenue and Arden Avenue, fronting the Project Site. The Project would not remove or obstruct any existing road, bicycle infrastructure, pedestrian facility, or transit. The Pr oject would not prevent future installation of bicycle facilities. The Project would provide 215 vehicle parking spaces, 6 long-term bicycle parking spaces.

Based on the above, the Project would not conflict with programs, plans, ordinances, or policies addressing the circulation system. The Transportation Assessment included analysis to determine the Project’s transportation related impacts according to the C ity’s Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines. The analysis concluded that the Project does not conflict with any plans, programs, 683 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 30 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
ordinances, or polices addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadways, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 identifies vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts. Based on the land use type and density, the VMT screening assessment ( see Appendix A) estimates that the Project Site, positioned at the border of two transportation analysis zones (TAZs), would generate an average household VMT per capita of 7 and 6.84, which is less than the impact threshold of 7. 39 for a Project within the City of Glendale . 5 Therefore, the Project would not
result in a significant VMT impact and would not conflict or be inconsistent with the City’s TIA Guidelines for VMT and with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3.

As mentioned above, the Project Site fronts North Central Avenue and would not substantially increase hazards due to the geometric design of the existing street. No Project design features would affect the visibility between vehicles, pedestrians, or bicyclists at the Project Site. No unusual or incompatible elements or uses are proposed that would increase impediments or hazards to vehicular or pedestrian movement. There is 10- foot paved sidewalk on the western boundary of the Project Site along Central Avenue and a 10-foot paved sidewalk on the northern boundary of the Project Site along Arden Avenue that can provide safe walking areas for pedestrians. For these reasons, the Project would not substantially increase hazards.

Based on the above, traffic effects of the Project would not be significant, and the Project satisfies this criterion of the Class 32 Exemption.

Noise
The following section summarizes and incorporates by reference information from the Noise Study that was conducted for this Project; the findings are included as Appendix B of this Categorical Exemption.

In accordance with Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines, a project would have a potentially significant impact related to noise and ground borne vibration if it would result in:
• Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies.
• Generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels. • Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines also includes:

5 See Appendix A: Transportation Assessment.
684 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 31 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
• For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise? The Project Site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not located within two miles of public airport or public use airport, nor is it within the vicinity of private airstrips. Therefore, the Project would result in no impacts to this screening criteria and no further analyses of this topic is necessary.

A Project would normally have a significant impact on noise levels from construction if:
• Construction activities lasting more than one day would exceed existing ambient exterior sound levels by 10 dBA (hourly Leq) or more at a noise-sensitive use; • Construction activities lasting more than 10 days in a three-month period would exceed existing ambient exterior noise levels by 5 dBA (hourly Leq) or more at a noise-sensitive use; or • Construction activities of any duration would exceed the ambient noise level by 5 dBA (hourly Leq) at a noise sensitive use between the hours of 9:00 PM and 7:00 AM Monday through Friday, before 8:00 AM or after 6:00 PM on Saturday, or at any time on Sunday.

Noise sensitive uses are defined as such uses as residences, schools, libraries, churches and medical facilities.6 The Project Site fronts North Central Avenue and is bordered by a restaurant and a hotel to the north, a hotel to the south, commercial businesses to the west, and a multi -story parking structure to the east, as well as multi -family residential uses to the southwest . The surrounding hotels, church, and multi-family residential uses constitute the nearest noise sensitive uses. Specifically, the nearest would be the hotel uses located adjacent to the north and south of the Project Site. Short -term sound monitoring was conducted at f our (4) locations selected to represent the nearest sensitive receptor in each direction. The distance from the site range from 15 feet to 350 feet in order to measure the ambient sound environment at different noise sensitive uses in the Project vicinity. 7 To be representative of the
time of day when peak construction and operation of the Project could occur, measurements were taken over 15-minute intervals at each location between the hours of 9:12 AM and 10:2 2 AM on Wednesday, April 17, 2024 and provided in Appendix B. As detailed in Appendix B, ambient noise levels ranged from a low of 57.4 dBA (Leq -15minute) southwest of the Project Site adjacent to the hotel uses along Arden Avenue (Site 2) to a high of 67.4 dBA (Leq -15minute) west of the Project Site adjacent to hotel uses along Central Avenue (Site 1).

6 See California Code of Regulations, Title 21, Section 5014. 7 The location of monitoring locations is detailed in the Noise Study included as Appendix B. 685 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 32 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
On-Site Construction Noise
Construction noise sources are regulated within the City of Glendale Municipal Code (GMC) Section

8.36.080, between the hours of 7:00 PM on one day to 7:00 AM of the next day or from 7:00 PM on Saturday to 7:00 AM on Monday or from 7:00 PM preceding a holiday to 7:00 AM.

Based on consultation with the applicant, a list has been compiled of construction equipment typically used for this scale of construction and expected to be used on site. 8 Table 4: Construction Maximum Noise Estimates presents the maximum noise impacts that are forecasted to occur at each of the receptor sites. As shown, average noise levels during construction would result in a maximum increase of 11.1 dBA (Leq-1hour) above the significance threshold of 85 dBA during the building construction phase west of the Project Site at the adjacent hotel building to the south of the Project Site (Site 1) without implementation of technically feasible noise reduction measure as mentioned in Section 8.36.290(K) of the City’s Municipal Code.

The Project would be required to adhere to Section 8.36.290(K) of the GMC, which requires noise limitations to be implemented during construction to the extent feasible. Noise limitations that are commonly used include the use of mufflers, shields, sound b arriers and/or any other noise reduction device or techniques during the operation of the equipment. More specifically, using optimal muffler systems on all equipment would reduce construction noise levels by 10 dBA or more. 9 Temporary
abatement techniques such as the use of a noise barrier can achieve a 5-dBA noise level reduction when it is tall enough to break the line- of-sight to the receiver. Modifications such as dampening of metal surfaces or the redesign of a particular piece of equipment can achieve noise reduction of up to 5 dBA.10 Moving stationary equipment away from sensitive receptors will reduce noise levels at the receptor as every doubling of distance will reduce noise by 4 to 6 dBA. Therefore, adherence to the GMC would further reduce construction noise levels at all nearby sensitive uses. Moreover, the Project would comply with the GMC as it relates to construction equipment by ensuring that the operation of noise generating construction equipment would not occur between the hours of 7:00 PM on one day and 7:00 AM of the next day, or from 7 :00 PM on Saturday to 7:00 AM on Monday, or from 7:00 PM preceding a holiday.

Compliance with the above practices would ensure construction noise levels are reduced to the maximum extent feasible; thus, construction noise levels would not be considered significant.

8 See Table 4 in the Noise Study included as Appendix B to this document. 9 FHWA. Special Report—Measurement, Prediction, and Mitigation. June 2017. Accessed April 2024. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/Environment/noise/construction_noise/special_report/hcn04.cfm. 10 FHWA. Special Report—Measurement, Prediction, and Mitigation. June 2017. 686 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 33 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
TABLE 4

CONSTRUCTION MAXIMUM NOISE ESTIMATES
Loca
tion
Calculated Noise Level (Leq-1hour) by Construction Phase Significance
Threshold
Maximum
Increase
Above
Significance
Threshold
Demolition Grading Building
Construction Paving Architectural
Coating
Site
1 96.1 95.0 95.0 94.4 84.1 85.0 +11.1
Site
2 87.5 86.5 86.5 85.9 75.6 85.0 +2.5
Site
3 71.6 70.6 70.6 69.9 59.7 85.0 ––
Site
4 68.7 67.7 67.6 67.0 56.8 85.0 ––
Refer to Appendix B.

Off- Site Construction Noise
Construction of the Project would require worker , haul, and vendor truck trips to and from the site to work on the site, export soil, and deliver supplies to the site. Trucks traveling to and from the Project Site would be required to travel along a haul route approved by the City. At the maximum, approximately 41 hauling trips per day would take place during the grading phase based on construction schedule assumptions. Haul truck traffic would take the most direct route to the freeway ramp along North Central Avenue.

These trips are considered in the evaluation of noise. Noise associated with construction truck trips was estimated using the Caltrans FHWA Traffic Noise Model based on the maximum number of worker and truck trips in a day. Project haul truck trips, which includes medium - and heavy -duty trucks, would generate noise levels of approximately 47.3 to 58.2 dBA, respectively, measured at a distance of 25 feet from the adjacent sensitive receptor. Existing noise levels ranged from a low of 57.4 dBA (Leq-15minute) southwest of the Project Site adjacent to the hotel uses along Arden Avenue (Site 2) to a high of 67.4 dBA (Leq-15minute) west of the Project Site adjacent to hotel uses along Central Avenue (Site 1). The noise level increases from truck trips would be below the significance threshold of 5 dBA. Therefore, off- site construction noise impacts would not be considered significant.

Vibration
As mentioned previously, Section 8.36.210 of the City’s Municipal Code prohibits vibration to exceed the perception threshold at or beyond the property boundary of the source or at 150 feet from the source if on a public space or public right of way. As su ch, for purposes of this analysis, impacts would be considered significant if construction vibration levels exceed 0.01 in/sec for residential and buildings where people normally sleep.
687 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 34 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
As shown in Table 5: On-Site Construction Vibration Impacts–Human Annoyance, and discussed in more detail in Attachment B, the forecasted vibration levels due to on -site construction activities would not exceed vibration perception threshold of 0.01 in/sec for at the adjacent residential uses. Additionally, compliant with State regulations, construction activities would include best practices which includes techniques to reduce friction, thus making the penetration for a large range of soils to be less vibration intensive. Impacts related from on-site construction vibration would not be considered significant.

TABLE 5

Loaded Trucks

Small bulldozer
1 Hotel uses to the southa 0.008 0.002 0.01 No
2 Hotel uses to the northa 0.008 0.001 0.01 No
3 Church uses to the
southwest 0.001 0.000 0.01 No
4 Multi-family residential
uses to the southwest 0.000 0.000 0.01 No
Refer to Appendix B.
a - Assumed loaded trucks would not occur within 45 feet of nearest sensitive receptors.

Operation
The Project would introduce various stationary noise sources, including heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems, which would be located either on the roof, the side of a structure, or on the ground. All Project mechanical equipment would be required to be designed with appropriate noise- control devices—such as sound attenuators, acoustics louvers, or sound screens/parapet walls—to comply with noise-limitation requirements provided in the GMC.

The stationary equipment would be required to comply with GMC Section 30.34.070, which establishes low-sound intensities from mechanical equipment. Therefore, operation of mechanical equipment on the Project building would not exceed the City’s threshold o f significance and impacts would be less than significant.

Air Quality
The following analysis is based on the Project’s Air Quality Technical Report included in Appendix C.

Significant air quality impacts could occur if a project were inconsistent with the Air Quality Management 688 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 35 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
Plan (AQMP) or exceeded the quantified thresholds developed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD).

The SCAQMD is the agency principally responsible for comprehensive air pollution control in Los Angeles and prepared the AQMP, which contains strategies and policies for achieving air quality standards and healthy air. The AQMP relies upon SCAG growth projections, which are based on cities’ general plan land use and zoning parameters. Projects that do not result in or contribute to air quality violations and are consistent with the growth forecasts of the AQMP are considered consistent with the AQMP.11 The Project proposes land uses consistent with the forecasted land use of the Site as envisioned in the City’s General Plan and reflected in SCAG’s growth projections for the City. Therefore, the Project would not exceed the assumptions utilized in preparing the AQMP and is consistent with the land use assumptions on which the AQMP is based. Nor would the Project delay the timely attainment of the air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP. As discussed below, the Project would not cause or contribute to new air quality violations nor increase the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations. Therefore, the Project would not be inconsistent with the AQMP.

In addition, the SCAQMD has developed quantified thresholds for identifying regional and localized air quality violations from both construction and operation of a project. To evaluate the Project against these quantified thresholds, an estimate of emissio ns was prepared utilizing the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), the tool recommended by SCAQMD.

Estimated construction emissions were quantified based on the type and number of equipment associated with construction of the proposed building. The emissions were estimated using the CalEEMod software, a program recommended by SCAQMD. The input values for construction equipment were based on default assumptions in CalEEMod for a Project of this size and type with adjustments made to various inputs based on site specific information and Project -specific activities determined through consultation with the applicant and experience with similar projects. The default values are based on construction surveys conducted by SCAQMD and may not fully reflect the type of site and project that is being evaluated.

Adjustments are recommended by SCAQMD when supported by information specific to the location or the project. The adjustments made for the Project include the anticipated construction schedule, equipment for each phase, vehicle trips and the quantity of debris and soil to be hauled off -site, all of which have been calibrated to the specifics of the site and the Project. Further detail is provided in Appendix C.

11 SCAQMD. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. April 1993, pa 12-3. 689 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 36 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
Emissions calculations assumed (1) all construction activities would be conducted in compliance with the SCAQMD rules pertaining to Fugitive Dust (Rule 403) 12 and Architectural Coatings (Rule 1113); 13 and (2) heavy-duty diesel equipment engines would meet minimum Tier 3 standards in accordance with CARB fleet requirements. Table 6: Maximum Construction Emissions presents the maximum estimated daily emissions anticipated to occur throughout the duration of Project construction. As shown, maximum daily emissions during construction of volatile organic compounds (VOC), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), su lfur oxides (SOx), and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) would be below the applicable SCAQMD maximum daily emission thresholds.

TABLE 6

MAXIMUM CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS
Source
VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
pounds/day
2026 1.1 12.2 14.3 <0.1 3.4 1.6
2027 0.9 5.9 13.8 <0.1 1.8 0.6
2028 5.4 5.5 12.5 <0.1 1.8 0.5
2029 5.4 0.9 2.1 <0.1 0.4 0.2
Maximum 5.4 12.2 14.3 <0.1 3.4 1.6
SCAQMD Mass Daily Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Threshold exceeded? No No No No No No
Notes: Totals in table may not appear to add exactly due to rounding in the computer model calculations.

Notes: CO = carbon monoxide; N Ox = nitrogen oxides; PM10 = particulate matter less than 10 microns; PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns; SOx = sulfur oxides; VOC = volatile organic compounds.

Refer to Appendix C: Air Quality Study.

The Project would also generate air pollutant emissions during operation from normal day -to-day use of the Project. Table 7: Maximum Operational Emissions presents the maximum estimated daily emissions anticipated to occur throughout the operation of the Project. As shown, the daily operational emissions attributed to the Project’s operation would not exceed the SCAQMD established operational significance thresholds.

12 SCAQMD. Fugitive Dust (Rule 403). Accessed April 2024. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/rule-iv/rule- 403.pdf.
13 SCAQMD. Architectural Coatings (Rule 1113). Accessed April 2024. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/reg- xi/r1113.pdf.
690 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 37 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
TABLE 7

MAXIMUM OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS
Source
VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
pounds/day
Mobile 1.5 1.5 17.6 0.1 4.9 1.3
Area 4.2 1.6 10.0 <0.1 0.1 0.1
Energy <0.1 0.4 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Total 5.7 3.5 27.8 0.1 5.0 1.4
SCAQMD Mass Daily Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold exceeded? No No No No No No
Notes: Totals in table may not appear to add exactly due to rounding in the computer model calculations.

CO = carbon monoxide; NOx = nitrogen oxides; PM10 = particulate matter less than 10 microns; PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns; SOx = sulfur oxides; VOC = volatile organic compounds.

Refer to Appendix C: Air Quality Study.

The SCAQMD Final Localized Significance Threshold [LST] Methodology14 provides guidance on analysis of localized air quality impacts. SCAQMD provides LST thresholds based on the size and location of the site.

Maximum daily LST values were derived for emissions of NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 that would be generated during construction and operation of projects. Table 8: Estimated On-Site Emissions and LST Comparison provides the maximum daily on-site emissions generated by the Project during construction and operation. As shown, on -site emissions during construction and operation would not exceed the applicable LSTs.

TABLE 8

LOCALIZED CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS
Source
NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
On-Site Emissions (pounds/day)
Construction
Total maximum emissions 12.2 14.3 3.4 1.6
LST threshold 80 498 4 3
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No
Operational
Project area/energy emissions 2.0 10.2 0.1 0.1
LST threshold 80 498 1 1
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No
Notes: Totals in table may not appear to add exactly due to rounding in the computer model calculations.

CO = carbon monoxide; NOx = nitrogen oxide; PM10 = particulate matter less than 10 microns; PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns.

Refer to Appendix C: Air Quality Study.

14 SCAQMD. Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (2008), p. 3-3. Accessed April 2024. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/localized-significance-thresholds/final-lst-methodology- document.pdf?sfvrsn=2.
691 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 38 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
SCAQMD has stated that if an individual project generates less than significant construction or operational emissions, then the project would not generate a cumulatively considerable increase in emissions for those pollutants, without needing to consider the contribution of related projects. 15 The Project would
not generate construction or operational emissions that exceed the SCAQMD’s recommended regional thresholds of significance and therefore the Project would not generate a cumulatively considerable increase. As shown, the Project would result in less than significant impacts on air quality, and therefore the Project satisfies this criterion of the Class 32 Exemption.

Water Quality
As authorized by the Clean Water Act, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit (NPDES) program controls water pollution by regulating point sources that discharge pollutants into waters of the United States. Point sources are discrete conveyances, such as pipes or man-made ditches.

Three general sources of potential short-term, construction-related stormwater pollution are associated with the proposed Project: (1) the handling, storage, and disposal of construction materials containing pollutants; (2) the maintenance and operation of construction equipment; and (3) earthmoving activities that, when not controlled, may generate soil erosion via storm runoff or mechanical equipment.

The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) oversees the implementation of NPDES in California through the General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit (GCASWP). Compliance with the requirements of GCASWP include the preparation of a Stormwater Pol lution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that includes Best Management Practices (BMPs) to address such things as erosion control, cleanup, and maintenance of dumpsters.
16 The purpose of a SWPPP, prepared in compliance with SWRCB requirements, is to ensure that construction of the Project would not violate water quality standards and/or discharge requirements, or otherwise substantially degrade water quality.

The Project would be required to satisfy all applicable requirements of GMC Chapter 13.29, Stormwater and Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Control and Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), at the time of construction to the satisfaction of the City of Glendale Public Works Department.

These requirements include preparation of a Stormwater Prevention Plan (SWPPP) containing structural treatment and source control measures appropriate and applicable to the proposed Project. The SWPPP would incorporate best management practices (BMPs) by r equiring controls of pollutant discharges that utilize best available technology economically achievable (BAT) and best conventional pollutant control technology (BCT) to reduce pollutants. Examples of BAT/BCT that may be implemented during site

15 SCAQMD. White Paper on Regulatory Options for Addressing Cumulative Impacts from Air Pollution Emissions, board meeting, Agenda No. 29 (September 5, 2003), Appendix D, p. D-3.
16 California Green Building Code . 5.106.1 Stormwater Pollution Prevention for Projects That Disturb Less Than One Acre of Land.
692 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 39 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
grading and construction of the proposed Project could include straw hay bales, straw bale inlet filters, filter barriers, and silt fences. Preparation of the SWPPP would be incorporated as a condition of approval. Implementation of BMPs would ensure that Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB) water quality standards are met during construction activities of the proposed Project.

Therefore, no significant impact during construction would occur.

After construction, the new development and the new hardscape and landscape improvements would increase the intensity of activities on the site and would likely result in an increase in typical urban pollutants generated by motor vehicle use on roadways an d parking areas adjacent to the Project site, and the maintenance and operation of landscaped areas. Stormwater quality is generally affected by the length of time since the last rainfall, rainfall intensity, urban uses of the area, and quantity of transported sediment. Typical urban water quality pollutants usually result from motor vehicle operations; oil and grease residues; fertilizer/pesticide uses; human/animal littering; careless material storage; and poor handling and property management. The majority of pollutant loads are usually washed away during the first flush of the storm occurring after the dry-season period.

These pollutants have the potential to degrade water quality. However, the quality of runoff from the Project site would be subject to Section 401 of the CWA under the NPDES permit, which would be issued by the LARWQCB.

Development projects are required by the GMC to submit and then implement a SUSMP containing design features and BMPs appropriate and applicable to the Project. The purpose of the SUSMP is to reduce postconstruction pollutants in stormwater discharges. The proposed Project would incorporate silt fences, sandbag barriers, and/or stabilization of the construction entrance/exit to satisfy the SUSMP standards. One of the requirements of the SUSMP is that the Project retain on-site water runoff from the first 0.75 inches of a 24- hour rain event. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the City must approve the SUSMP; preparation of the SUSMP is incorporated as a project design feature.

There would be no potential water quality impacts following the preparation of the SUSMP and implementation of the BMPs.
(e) The site can adequately be served by all required utilities and public services .

Utilities
Water
The Project Site is located in a developed, urbanized portion of Glendale that is served by existing water mains and utility services. Water is provided by Glendale Water and Power. Based on forecasted growth, 693 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 40 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
the GWP Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP)17 projects adequate water supplies through 2040. The 2020 UWMP estimates that Glendale’s 2025 water demand will be approximately 21,414 acre feet per year and forecasts a demand of 21,542 acre feet per by the year 2040, with supply available to meet this demand throughout the planning period.

The Project is estimated to generate a water demand of 28,808 gallons per day, 18 based on a demand factor of 104 gallons per day per capita, which is equivalent to 32.3 acre feet per year.19 The demand projects used in the UWMP were derived from SCAG growth projections which assumed growth in population and households within the Glendale Plan area based on the development potential expressed by existing land use designations and zoning. The Project is consistent with the assumed growth projects GWP utilized in developing the UWMP. 20 The Project would also be designed to current building codes that would reduce water demand as compared to previous uses through requirements for more efficient fixtures. For these reasons, it is expected that GWP has sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project.

Wastewater
The Project Site is located in a developed, urbanized portion of Glendale that is served by the existing wastewater system provided by the Glendale Public Works Department (GPWD). Sewage from the Project would be treated by the City of Los Angeles Hyperion System, which includes the Los Angeles -Glendale Water Reclamation Plant (LAGWRP), and the Hyperion Treatment Plant (HTP). The majority of all flows are collected and conveyed to the LAGWRP, with a small amount of flow from the Tyburn basin discharged to t he HTP. The LAGWRP has a treatment capacity of 20 mgd, of which the City has a right to approximately 9 mgd of the highly treated wastewater effluent. According to the City’s UWMP, the volume of wastewater collected from the City in 2020 was 6,024 mgd. Wastewater conveyed to LAGWRP received secondary and tertiary treatment to generate recycled water. The HTP has a maximum daily flow of 450 mgd, and a peak wet weather flow of 800 mgd, and processes approximately 275 mgd of wastewater.21 The LAGWRP has a capacity of 80 million gallons per day and processes an average daily flow of 20 mgd, with a remaining capacity of approximately 60 mgd. As shown in Table 9: Estimated Sewage Generation, it is estimated that the proposed Project would generate 14,870 gpd of net new wastewater. Given that the HTP is currently operating at 525 mgd below capacity and LAGWRP is

17 City of Glendale, California. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. Accessed April 2024. https://www.glendaleca.gov/government/departments/glendale-water-and-power/reports-plans. 18 (104 gallons per day per capita * 277 residents) = 28,808 gallons per day 19 (104 gallons per day per capita * 277 residents * 365 days) / (325,900 acre feet per year per 1 gallon) = 32.3 acre feet per year 20 City of Glendale, California. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. 21 City of Glendale, California. “Housing Element.” General Plan. Accessed April 2024. https://www.glendaleca.gov/government/departments/community-development/planning/city-wide-plans/housing- element.
694 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 41 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
currently operating 60 mgd below capacity, the City’s wastewater system operates well under current peak dry and peak wet weather conditions. For these reasons, the addition of approximately 14,435 gpd of wastewater generated by the proposed Project would not result in either of the plant’s exceeding capacity.

Additionally, the City’s 2020 Wastewater Master Plan Update reports that existing conditions exhibit the average dry weather flow of wastewater at 13.4 million gallons per day, with future build- out to reach

16.0 million gallons per day by 2040, and a peak wet weather flow of 56.0 mgd, with future build-out to reach 58.9 mgd by 2040.22 As the City’s average dry weather flow is currently operating 42.6 mgd below the estimated peak wet weather flow, 23 the addition of approximately 14,435 gpd of wastewater generated by the proposed Project would not result in surpassing the threshold for wastewater flows, and impacts to wastewater facilities would be less than significant.

Moreover, the City imposes a sewer facilities charge to connect to a sanitary sewer within the City, in accordance with the sewer facilities charge schedule based on gallons per minute of the proposed project. The fee is applied when new development result s in an increase in the volume of wastewater charged to the collection system. The City calculates these fees based on proportional increases in wastewater flow, to impose the fee in an equitable manner. Prior to the issuance of a permit by the City to connect to the City sewerage system, the Project shall submit calculations of the projected design discharge flow to the superintendent of building for their approval. 24 For this reason, adequate capacity
exists to treat the sewage increase, and the impact on wastewater facilities would be less than significant.

22 City of Glendale, California. Wastewater Master Plan Update. Accessed April 2024. https://www.glendaleca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/67894/637964061847870000. 23 56.0 mgd (Current Peak Wet Weather Flow) – 13.4 mgd (Current Average Dry Weather Flow) = 42.6 mgd capacity of Existing Conditions
24 City of Glendale, California. “§ 13.40.060.” Municipal Code. Accessed April 2024. https://ecode360.com/43350133?highlight=sewer&searchId=20116506255216069. 695 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 42 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
TABLE 9

ESTIMATED SEWAGE GENERATION
Land Use Quantity – du Factor (gpd/unit)a Generation Studio 1 du 75 gpd/du 75 gpd
1-Bedroom 37 du 110 gpd/du 4,070 gpd
2-Bedroom 61 du 150 gpd/du 9,150 gpd
3-Bedroom 6 du 190 gpd/du 1,140 gpd
Total Daily Estimate 14,435 gpd
Annual Estimate 16.2 afy
Note: gpd = gallons per day; ksf = thousand square feet; du=dwelling unit; afy = acre feet per year a City of Los Angeles, Sewage Generation Factors Chart, Effective April 6, 2012 Stormwater
The Project Site is located in a developed portion of Glendale that is currently served by existing stormwater infrastructure. In addition, the Project would be required to demonstrate compliance with the Glendale Low Impact Development (LID) Ordinance standards, which are more rigorous than the standards to which the prior uses were built. The primary purpose of the LID Ordinance is to ensure that development and redevelopment projects manage runoff in a manner that captures rainwater and removes pollutants while reducing the volume and intensity of stormwater flows. Through implementation of design features and Best Management Practices, stormwater would be captu red and managed on-Site. Therefore, the volume of stormwater runoff entering the public stormwater infrastructure during peak events would not increase as compared to existing conditions. Therefore, the Project can adequately be served by the stormwater utility system.

Solid Waste
Solid waste generated within the City is disposed of at landfill facilities throughout Los Angeles County.

Private haulers provide waste collection services for most multifamily residential and commercial developments within the City, including the Project . The Project would follow all City and State regulations related to recycling and reduction of solid waste. The County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works prepares an annual report on solid waste management in the County to address long -term needs and maintain adequate capacity. 25 As described in the County’s most recent report, no shortfall in permitted solid waste disposal capacity is anticipated to occur under forecasted growth and ongoing municipal efforts at waste reduction and diversion. For these reasons, the Project could b e adequately served by the solid waste disposal system.

25 Los Angeles County Public Works . “2021 Annual Report .” Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan . Accessed April 2024. https://www.dpw.lacounty.gov/epd/swims/ShowDoc.aspx?id=17389&hp=yes&type=PDF. 696 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 43 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
Solid waste generated on the Project Site could be deposited at the Scholl Canyon Landfill or at one of the other landfills located within the County of Los Angeles. The annual disposal rate at the Scholl Canyon facility is 209,000 tons per year, with a remaining 3.4-million-ton capacity.26 The proposed Project’s net new generation would be approximately 420 pounds per day,27 based on CalRecycle’s waste generation rate of 4 pounds per day for multi -family residential units, 28 as shown in Table 10: Estimated Solid Waste Generation. The estimate is conservative because it does not factor in recycling, industrial composting, or other waste diversion programs. Given that there is a remaining 3.4-million-ton-capacity, the Scholl Canyon facility would meet the needs of the City and the proposed Project.

TABLE 10

ESTIMATED SOLID WASTE GENERATION
Type of Use Unit Quantity
Waste
Generation
Ratea
(lb./unit/day)
Residential du 105 4/du
Total Daily Estimate 420 lbs./day
Note: du=dwelling unit
a CalRecycle, Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates, Residential Sector Electric Power, Natural Gas, and Telecommunications
The Project Site is located in a developed, urbanized portion of Glendale that is served by existing electric power, natural gas, and telecommunications services. In the context of the greater Los Angeles service area, the Project would not be a substantial source of new demand for services. New connections would be established for the Project; however, no substantial additional infrastructure would need to be installed or relocated to provide electric power facilities, natural gas facilities, or telecommun ication services. Furthermore, the Project Applicant shall be required to implement applicable California Building Code and Glendale Reach Code requirements, including the City’s Solar Roof Ordinance and the recently adopted All Electric Building Ordinance, that would further reduce utility demand as compared to the existing structures. Thus, the Project would be adequately served by existing electric power, natural gas, and telecommunications services.

26 Los Angeles County Public Works, Solid Waste Information Management System, Fact Sheet: Scholl Canyon Landfill. Accessed January 2025. https://pw.lacounty.gov/epd/swims/site/factsheet-esri.aspx?id=19&action=2 27 (105 residential units * 4 lbs./du/day) = 420 lb./day 28 CalRecycle. “Residential Sector.” Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates. Accessed March 2024. https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteCharacterization/General/Rates. 697 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 44 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
Public Services
A project could have a significant impact on public services if it were to generate substantial new demand for services through population or employment growth, result in additional demand for service due to insecure design or cause a decrease in service response times due to traffic congestion.

The City of Glendale Fire Department provides fire protection and emergency medical services for the Project Site. The Project Site is served by Glendale Fire Station 25, located approximately 1. 6 miles to the southeast. The City’s Glendale Polic e Department (GPD) provides police protection services to the Project Site from its station at 131 North Isabel Street, approximately 1. 3 miles to the southeast.

As mentioned previously, the proposed Project would introduce approximately 277 new residents29 to the City of Glendale. This incremental increase would not substantially affect the provision of fire or police protection, given the Project’s location in a highly urbanized area and proximity to existing fire and police services. The proposed Project would not result in a need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts.

Therefore, the Project would not create the need to construct new or expanded police, fire protectio n, or emergency medical facilities.

The Project would construct new residences but would not result in substantial population growth within the overall community. The development would be required to pay all applicable school and public facility fees. For these reasons, impacts on schools an d other public facilities would be less than significant.

For the reasons set forth above, the Project can adequately be served by all required utilities and public services and therefore the Project meets this criterion for the Class 32 Exemption.

29 (105 residential units * 2.63 (average household size)) = 277 residents 698 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 45 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025

INAPPLICABILITY OF EXCEPTIONS
As discussed below, the exceptions set forth in CEQA Guideline 15300.2 do not apply to the Project . (a) Location .

This exception applies only to exemption Class 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11, and does not apply to exemption Class

32. Because the Project meets the criteria for exemption Class 32, this exception does not apply . (b) Cumulative Impact.

A categorical exemption is inapplicable “when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant.” The Project consists of the new development of a residential site with residential uses that are consistent with the existing General Plan and zoning . As discussed above, the Project would not generate a considerable increase in population, tra nsportation, noise, or air pollutant emissions nor would it result in any other substantial impacts compared to existing uses of the site.

Based on the information from the Transportation Assessment, 30 the proposed Project is located in a transportation analysis zone (TAZ) in the City where the VMT Per -Capita of 7 and 6.84 is less than 85 percent of the City -wide average VMT Per -Capita of 7.39, and therefore, would have a less -than- significant transportation impact. As noted previously, projects that do not have individual significant impacts with respect to regional air quality or vehicle miles travelled are considered to not have a considerable contribution to cumulative effects. Moreover, th e Project is within the growth projections that inform public service facility and utility capacity planning and would not generate a considerable contribution to public services facilities or utility capacities. For these reasons, the Project would not have a considerable contribution to cumulative impacts. Therefore, this exception does not apply. (c) Unusual Circumstances.

A categorical exemption is inapplicable when there is a reasonable possibility that the activity would have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. Unusual circumstances could occur if the Project site featured conditions or a location substantially different than typically associated with the existing or proposed uses. The Project is located on a previously developed site in an existing urban area. Comparable residential uses exist in the vicinity of the Project Site to the north, west, and south. The Project Site is comparable in size and features adjacent and nearby parcels of similar zoning and use. The site is not within any designated scenic, agricultural, historic, mineral, natural resource or wildfire hazard area. The site is not within a hil lside area, nor does it contain any unusual geologic features or soil conditions. The building would be designed and constructed in accordance with applicable

30 See Appendix A: Transportation Assessment.
699 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 46 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
building codes, including seismic and energy codes. There are no unusual circumstances associated with the Project site or the proposed Project. Therefore, this exception does not apply. (d) Scenic Highways.

The Project site is not located in a scenic highway area .31 There is no State-designated scenic highway found in the City of Glendale, and n o unique ecological, geologic features or rock outcroppings are located on the Project site. Accordingly, this exception does not apply. (e) Hazardous Waste Sites.

The Project Site is currently occupied by a surface parking lot and one -story commercial building. The Project Site is not located on any State hazardous site list and would not post an environmental hazard to people on the site or to surrounding sensitive receptors. 32 A query of the State Water Resources Control Board (SWR CB) website indicates that the Project Site containing APN 5644- 003-081 was previously a Cleanup Program Site for the leakage of chromium and other volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The case was determined closed as of March 8, 1994, with no further action required. 33 Moreover, the Project Site is not listed in any State or federal lists of sites requiring cleanup of hazardous substances; and is not included on any hazardous materials lists pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5.34 For these reasons , there are no known or identified potentially significant effects on the environment. The Project Site contains no hazardous environmental conditions. Accordingly, this exception does not apply.
(f) Historical Resources.

The Project site does not contain any features that are listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources or in a local register of historical resources. The Project site is not identified as a historic resource in the City’s Register of Historic Resources , North Glendale Historic Context, or other City parcel reports or references. 35 Due to the distance from the Project site, implementation of the Project would not alter any of the physical characteristics of nearby historic

31 California Department of Transportation. “California Scenic Highway Mapping System.” Accessed April 2024. https://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=465dfd3d807c46cc8e8057116f1aacaa. 32 California Department of Toxic Substances Control. “Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List.” EnviroStor. Accessed April 2024. https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/.
33 State Water Resources Control Board. “GeoTracker.” Accessed April 2024. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=SL603798937. 34 CalEPA. Cortese List Data Resources. Accessed April 2024. https://calepa.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/CorteseList/. 35 City of Glendale, California. Glendale Register of Historic Resources. Accessed April 2024. https://www.glendaleca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/72855/638346219011770000. 700 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 47 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
resources, including through construction activities, vibration from off -road equipment, and operation of the Project. Therefore, this exception does not apply. 701 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 48 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025

ADDITIONAL FINDINGS
A Class 32 Exemption is not available for any project that requires mitigation measures to reduce potential environmental impacts to less than significant. In addition to the findings stated previously, additional topics are discussed below to further demonstrate that no potential significant environmental impacts are expected to occur as a result of the Project.

Aesthetics
The proposed Project is located on three parcels consisting of an existing surface parking lot and a one - story commercial building . The design of the Project will complement the existing design of the surrounding neighborhood and will not introduce any new sources of substantial light or glare. All lighting associated would be subject to the lighting standards in the Glendale Municipal Code (GMC).

Furthermore, the Project Site does not contain any natural scenic resources, such as native trees or rock outcroppings. For these reasons, the Project would not result in any significant aesthetic impacts.

Agricultural and Forestry Resources
There is no existing zoning for agricultural uses in the Project area. 36 The Project does not contain any farmland or agricultural land that could potentially be impacted.

Biological Resources
The value of the Project site as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species was discussed previously. There are no riparian or wetland habitats on the Project site. The majority of the local area, including the proposed Project, has been developed or landscaped and supports largely non-native plant communities and species. Existing vegetation, including some existing trees, would be removed, none of which are protected species nor of substantial size. Moreover, the DSP and surrounding areas are completely developed and disturbed. For these reasons, impacts would be less than significant.

Cultural Resources
Historic resources are discussed previously. The site does not contain any other known cultural resources and unique paleontological or archeological resources are not known to be present on or around the Project site. Though the Project Site has previously been disturbed, excavation is planned for the foundation and two subterranean parking levels that would remove previously undisturbed soil. Although it is unlikely for the Project to unearth any subsurface artifacts during excavation, the City places a

36 City of Glendale, California. “Finding Zoning Information For A Property, Interactive Zoning Map.” Accessed April 2024. https://www.glendaleca.gov/government/departments/community-development/planning/codes-and-regulations/find- zoning-information-for-a-property.
702 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 49 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
condition of approval on projects as a standard practice that establishes a protocol for any inadvertent findings. Impacts to cultural resources would not be significant.

Energy
The Project would develop a site occupied by older structures with a new building that would comply with current building codes including the City of Glendale Green Building Code and State of California Title 24 energy code, including the CALGreen Code. For these reasons, the Project would not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources.

Geology and Soil s
The Project site is located approximately 0. 72 miles east of the fault zone for the Verdugo Fault.

Furthermore, the Project Site is not in a designated Earthquake Fault Zone (Alquist-Priolo).37 The Project Site is not within a liquefaction zone, as defined by the California Department of Conservation. 38 Notwithstanding, Project excavation and foundation design would be required to comply with City’s Department of Building and Safety guidelines and the building would be required to be built to the current building code, including seismic safety provisions. The potential for hazardous events related to flooding, subsidence, and slope instability is low due to the relative flatness of the site and surroundings and the distance from water bodies. For these reasons, the Project would not have a significant impact on geology and soils.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
There are no federal, State, or local quantitative adopted thresholds of significance for addressing a project’s greenhouse gas emissions. In the absence of any adopted, numeric threshold, this analysis evaluates the significance of a project by considering whether the project conflicts with applicable regulations or requirements adopted to implement a Statewide, regional, or local plan for the reduction of mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions. The City’s General Plan includes objectives adopted to reduce local greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, the City has adopted the Greener Glendale Plan, which incorporates measures in addition to the mandatory Green Building Standards for new construction projects in order to further reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The Project site is located in an urbanized area of the City with nearby access to public transportation and offsite destinations. The Project would replace outdated structures with new construction des igned in accordance with applicable energy, water, and waste efficiency measures specified in the Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, CALGreen standards, and City of Glendale Green Building Standards. As described in Appendix C, the

37 California Department of Conservation. “Fault Activity Map of California.” Accessed April 2024. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/fam/.
38 California Government, Open Data Portal. “Liquefaction Zones.” Accessed April 2024. https://data.ca.gov/dataset/cgs- seismic-hazards-program-liquefaction-zones/resource/e3b8d49f-5483-422d-8ba7-1a0b7ebb4309. 703 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 50 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
Project would not conflict with an applicable plan for the reduction or mitigation of greenhouse emissions. The Project would not have a significant impact on GHG emissions.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials
As discussed above, the Project Site is not categorized as a Hazardous Waste Site. In addition, the Project would not involve the routine use, handling or transport of hazardous materials that would create a substantial risk to the public. The Project would not exacerbate hazardous conditions related to airports or wildland fires. Roadways used for emergency evacuation would not be obstructed. For these reasons, the Project would not result in any significant hazards impacts.

Hydrology and Water Quality
Water quality is previously addressed. The Project would be required to implement drainage measures that comply with the City’s regulatory requirements. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood hazard maps, the Project Site is not located within the 100- year flood zone.

Therefore, the Project would not place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area or result in structures that would impede or redirect flood flows.
39 For these reasons , impacts on hydrology would not be significant.

Land Use and Planning
The following findings are in addition to what was stated previously regarding General Plan and zoning designations and policies. The neighborhood is urbanized and contains uses similar to and compatible with the Project. No alteration of street pattern is proposed, and no separation of existing uses or disruption of access would occur. The Project site is not located within a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. No significant land use or planning impacts would result from the Project.

Mineral Resources
The Project Site and surrounding area are characterized by features typical of the urban landscape and include commercial, industrial, and residential uses. The Project Site and surrounding area are characterized by features typical of the urban landscape and include commercial, industrial, and residential uses. The State Geologist has mapped Project Site within a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ) -3, defined as an a rea containing mineral deposits the significance of which cannot be evaluated from

39 City of Glendale, California. “Safety Element.” General Plan. Accessed April 2024. https://www.glendaleca.gov/government/departments/community-development/planning/city-wide-plans/safety-element. 704 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 51 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
available data. 40 A small area along the Los Angeles River flood plain, located along the mid -western boundary of the City, has been identified as containing a high likelihood for the presence of aggregate resources. However, the City’s Open Space and Conservation Element state s that the remainder of the City does not contain sufficient information to determine the significance of any aggregate deposits, and that no mineral resource zones in the City are of statewide or regional significance.41 For these reasons, the Project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource or locally important mineral resource recovery site and no impacts to mineral resources would occur.

Population and Housing
The Project would provide 105 new multi -family dwelling units, on a site which allows for multi -family residential uses, which could accommodate up to 277 residents based on the average household size in the City Plan area of 2.63 persons per household.42 SCAG’s most recent demographic profile states that in 2019 the City of Glendale contain ed 197,400 residents in approximately 76,200 dwelling units. 43 Moreover, the Project Site is located in an urbanized area that is surrounded by commercial and medium density residential uses. The proposed Project would not accelerate development in an undeveloped area, nor would buildout result in an adverse physical change in the environment or introduce unplanned infrastructure not previously evaluated in the DSP or General Plan.

The overall increase in housing units and population would be consistent with the SCAG forecasted addition of 8,600 households and approximately 22,876 people in the City between 2019 and 2050. 44,45,46
For these reasons, the Project would not represent a substantial change in population or housing for the City and Project impacts on population and housing would be less than significant.

Recreation
As stated above, the potential new residents of the Project would not represent a significant population increase. The proposed Project would construct a residential apartment building, including public and

40 City of Glendale, California. “Open Space and Conservation Element.” General Plan. Accessed March 2024. https://www.glendaleca.gov/government/departments/community-development/planning/city-wide-plans/open-space- and-conservation-element.
41 City of Glendale, California. “Open Space and Conservation Element.” General Plan. 42 US Census Bureau. Glendale city, California. Accessed April 2024. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/glendalecitycalifornia/INC110222. 43 SCAG. “Technical Reports, Demographics and Growth Forecast.” Final Connect SoCal 2024. 44 SCAG. “Technical Reports, Demographics and Growth Forecast.” Final Connect SoCal 2024. 45 (10,293,000 (L.A. County 2050 Population projection) / 4,155,000 (L.A. County 2050 Households projection)) = 2.59759 (ratio) (2.59759 x 84,800 (Glendale 2050 Households projection)) = 220,275.63 (Glendale 2050 Population projection) 46 (220,276 (Glendale 2050 Population projection) - 197,400 (Glendale 2019 Population)) = 22,876 residents 705 of 918

820 N Central Ave. Residential Project 52 City of Glendale Categorical Exemption Findings January 2025
private open space. For this reason, the increase in demand for recreational facilities would not be substantial enough such that substantial physical deterioration of nearby recreational facilities would occur, or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. The Project would not have a significant effect on recreational facilities. In addition, the project will be required to pay city impact fees associated with parks and libraries.

Tribal Cultural Resources
The Project site is an urban location that has been previously developed. The Project site contains no known tribal cultural resources. Excavation is planned for the foundation and subterranean parking levels which could encounter previously undisturbed so il. Although it is unlikely for subsurface artifacts to be unearthed during excavation, the City has a condition of approval as a standard practice that establishes a protocol for any inadvertent findings. Impacts to tribal cultural resources would not be significant.

Wildfire
The Project site is located in a previously developed and urbanized area of the City that does not contain wildlands or high fire hazards terrain or vegetation. The Project site is not located in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ).47 No impacts would occur.

47 CalFire. “Fire Hazard Severity Zones Maps.” Accessed April 2024. https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/. 706 of 918

APPENDIX A
Transportation Assessment
707 of 918

APPENDIX A.1
820 N. Central Avenue 105-Unit Apartment Complex, Glendale, CA Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Assessment
708 of 918

Traffic, Transportation, and Parking
Consultants
833 Americana Way, Suite 505
Glendale, CA 91210
[email protected]
Ph: 818-694-2880
Fax: 818-888-4541

To: Fred Zohrehvand, Principal Mobility Planner, City of Glendale

From: Jano Baghdanian, P.E., T.E., President, JB & Associates

Date: February 6, 2024

Subject: 820 N. Central Avenue 105-Unit Apartment Complex, Glendale, CA Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Assessment

This memorandum has been prepared by JB Associates to present a Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) screening assessment for the proposed residential project (the “Project”) located at 820 N Central Avenue in the City of Glendale, California.

In summary, it is determined that the project is exempt from any further VMT analysis based on its characteristics and location. The project is situated within the TAZ’s with Home-based VMT Per-Capita of 7.00 and 6.84, both of which fall below the citywide existing 85 percent average per-capita VMT (refer to Figure 1). As a result, it is excluded from additional VMT assessment. This VMT screening assessment includes a comprehensive description of the existing setting, a detailed overview of the proposed project, and an assessment of VMT specific to the proposed project.

Project Description
The Project is situated at 820 N. Central Avenue, positioned at the southeast corner of the Central Avenue and Arden Road intersection. The proposed Project entails the construction of an eight-story, 105-unit apartment complex, featuring two levels of subterranean parking. The current site houses a restaurant that will be demolished to make way for the new development.
709 of 918

Vehicle Mile Travel (VMT) Analysis
Overview of Senate Bill 743
On September 27, 2013, Governor Brown signed Senate Bill (SB) SB 743 (Steinberg, 2013). Among other things, SB 743 created a process to change the way the analysis of transportation impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is conducted. The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) was tasked to amend the CEQA Guidelines to provide an alternative to the traditional metric of automobile delay which would promote three statutory goals:
the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, the development of multimodal transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses.

Under SB 743, the focus of transportation analysis pursuant to CEQA shifts from driver delay, or Level of Service (LOS), to reduction in VMT, reduction in GHG emissions, creation of multimodal networks, and promotion of mixed-use developments. In December 2018, the California Natural Resources Agency certified and adopted amendments to the CEQA Guidelines implementing SB 743 Technical Advisory for Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA with an implementation date of July 1, 2020, which has passed.

Project Screening Criteria
Lead agencies traditionally have set certain thresholds to determine whether a project requires transportation analysis or if a project could be expected to cause less than significant impacts without a detailed study. Typically, these thresholds were based on a project’s peak hour trip generation forecast (e.g., if a project was expected to result in 50 or more weekday AM or PM peak hour vehicle trips).

Under SB 743, this shifts to VMT methodology and a screening process to determine if a project will be required to conduct a detailed (quantitative) assessment of VMT. OPR’s Technical Advisory included several criteria for project screening purposes, including transit proximity and project size (small projects).

The City has subsequently adopted their revised transportation impact analysis guidelines (TIA Guidelines), and this memorandum has been prepared in response to this guidance, as described in the following paragraphs.

Map-Based Screening
Section 2.1.2.1 of the City’s TIA Guidelines notes “that projects Residential and employment projects that are proposed in areas that generate VMT below adopted 710 of 918

City thresholds can be presumed to have a less-than-significant transportation impact and would not require a detailed VMT analysis. This determination would be based on residential and employment VMT screening maps (Attachment B) which show transportation analysis zones (TAZs) in the City where the VMT is below the City’s impact threshold. The following types of projects could be screened out using this approach Office (or other employment projects) proposed in TAZs with home-based work”.

As depicted in Figure 1, the Project is positioned at the border of two TAZ’s with average VMT Per-Capita values of 7 and 6.84. These figures are below 85% of the citywide average VMT Per-Capita of 7.39, rendering the Project exempt from any additional VMT analysis.

711 of 918

Figure 1: Project TAZ’s Location

Source: City of Glendale Transportation Analysis Guidelines

712 of 918

Figure 2: Project Site Plan

713 of 918

Figure 3: Project Aerial Plan

714 of 918

APPENDIX A.2
820 N. Central Avenue 105-Unit Apartment Complex, Glendale, CA Technical Memorandum
715 of 918

Traffic, Transportation, and Parking Consultants
833 Americana Way, Suite 505
Glendale, CA 91210
[email protected]
Ph: 818-694-2880
Fax: 818-888-4541

1 To: Pastor Casanova, T.E., Principal Traffic Engineer, City of Glendale From: Jano Baghdanian, P.E., T.E., President, JB & Associates Date: February 6, 2024
Subject: 820 N. Central Avenue 105-Unit Apartment Complex, Glendale, CA

This Technical Memorandum has been prepared for the proposed apartment project located at 820 N. Central Avenue (the “Project”), in the City of Glendale, California. The purpose of this memorandum is to present the Project background information, the Project trip generation and determine if any local transportation analysis is required to receive the City’s approval to proceed with the local transportation analysis.

Project Description
The Project is located at 820 N. Central Avenue and is located at the southeast corner of the Central Avenue and Arden Road intersection. The Project site consists of an eight-story 105-unit apartment complex with two levels of subterranean parking. The Project is proposed to demolish an existing restaurant on the lot. The proposed eight-story apartment complex will consist of 129,440 SF comprised of:
 1st Floor – 4,371 SF
 2nd Floor – 17,867 SF
 3rd Floor – 17,867 SF
 4th Floor – 17,867 SF
 5th Floor – 17,867 SF
716 of 918

2  6th Floor - 17,867 SF
 7th Floor - 17,867 SF
 8th Floor - 17,867 SF

Project Access
As shown in Figure 1—Project Site Plan, vehicular access to and from the subterranean garage will be provided through a 20-foot-wide two-way driveway at the north end of the Project site on Arden Road.

Project Trip Generation
The number of vehicular trips generated by the Project on a weekday and during the AM and PM community peak hours were estimated using Trip Generation Rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 11 th Edition . The results are shown in Table 1—Project Trip Generation.

The Project is estimated to generate 39 net new AM peak-hour trips, and 41 net new PM peak- hour trips.

The Project is estimated to generate less than 50 total vehicle trips during the AM and PM peak hours. In accordance with the City of Glendale Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines, dated October 30, 2020, a local transportation analysis is not required for the Project.

Rate Total In Out Rate Total In Out Rate Total
23% 77% 61% 39%
9 30 25 16
39 13 33 41 35 27 477
1 ITE "Trip Generation" Manual, 11th Edition, 2021
2Pass-by Reduction accounts for trips made as an intermediate stop on the way from an origin to a priminary trip destination. 3A Walk-In/Internal Capture rate was applied to account for walk-in patrons and the mixed-use development characterstic Trip Generation1
Land Use (ITE Code) Size Units AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips Daily Trips New Project Land Use Added
Multifamily Housing-Mid Rise (221) 105 d.u. 0.37 39 0.39 41 4.54 477 Net Trip Generation
Pass-by Reduction (20%)2
Walk-in & Internal Capture (10%)
3 717 of 918

3 Figure 1 – Project Site Plan
718 of 918

4 719 of 918

APPENDIX B
Noise Technical Report
720 of 918

NOI

SE STUDY
820 N CENTRAL AVE. RESIDENTIAL PROJECT
820 N. Central Avenue
Glendale, CA 91203
P
REPARED FOR:

City of Glendale
Community Development Department
613 E. Broadway,
Glendale, CA 91206
P
REPARED BY:
860 Hampshire Road, Suite P
Westlake Village, CA 91361
www.meridianconsultantsllc.com
MAY 2024
721 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project i Noise Study City of Glendale May 2024
Table of Contents
Section Page
Executive Summary .................................................................................................... 1 Project Description .................................................................................................... 2 Existing Conditions .................................................................................................... 4 Methodology ........................................................................................................... 11 Regulatory Compliance Measures ................................................................................... 14 Thresholds of Significance ........................................................................................... 16 Impact Analysis ........................................................................................................ 19 Certification ........................................................................................................... 24

Appendices
A Noise Monitoring Data Sheets
B Construction Noise Worksheet
C Construction Vibration Worksheet

722 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project ii Noise Study City of Glendale May 2024
Figures
Figure Page
1 Project Site Location ........................................................................................ 3 2 Noise Monitoring Location (Site 1) ......................................................................... 6 3 Noise Monitoring Location (Site 2) ......................................................................... 7 4 Noise Monitoring Location (Site 3) ......................................................................... 8 5 Noise Monitoring Location (Site 4) ......................................................................... 9 6 Sensitive Receptor Map .................................................................................... 10

Tables
Table Page
1 Ambient Noise Measurements ............................................................................. 4 2 Construction Equipment by Phase ....................................................................... 12 3 Construction Maximum Noise Estimates ................................................................. 20 4 On-Site Construction Vibration Impacts .................................................................. 22

723 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 1 Noise Study City of Glendale April 2024

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this noise analysis is to provide an assessment of the impacts resulting from development of the 820 N. Central Residential Project (Project) and to identify any measures that may be necessary to reduce potentially significant impacts.

On-Site Construction Noise
Construction noise levels would be reduced via Regulatory Compliance Measures (RCMs), which are existing requirements and reasonably anticipated standard conditions based on local, State, or federal regulations and laws that are frequently required independently of CEQA review and serve to offset or prevent specific impacts. RCMs are not included as mitigation measures in the environmental clearance document because the Project is required to comply with RCMs through State and local regulations.

Construction noise sources are regulated by Section 8.36.080 of the Glendale Municipal Code (GMC) which prohibits construction between the hours of 7:00 PM on one day to 7:00 AM of the next day or from 7:00 PM on Saturday to 7:00 AM on Monday or from 7:00 PM preceding a holiday to 7:00 AM. Modeled construction noise levels with RCMs implemented would reduce noise levels to within acceptable limits.

Noise reduction measures include but are not limited to optimal muffler systems, dampening materials, sound aprons, temporary barriers, and limiting simultaneous operations.

Off- Site Construction Noise
Construction of the Project would require worker, haul, and vendor truck trips to and from the site to work on the site, export soil, and deliver supplies to the site. Trucks traveling to and from the Project Site would be required to travel along a haul route approved by the City. At the maximum, approximately 17 hauling trips per day would take place during the grading phase based on construction schedule assumptions. Haul truck traffic would take the most direct route to the freeway ramp along North Central Avenue. The noise level increases from truck trips would be below the significance threshold of 5 dBA above ambient. As such, off-site construction noise impacts would not be considered significant.

Operational Noise
All Project mechanical equipment would be required to be designed with appropriate noise- control devices—such as sound attenuators, acoustics louvers, or sound screens/parapet walls— to comply with noise-limitation requirements provided in the GMC.

Construction Vibration
Compliant with State regulations, construction activities would include best practices which includes techniques to reduce friction, thus making the penetration for a large range of soils to be less vibration intensive. The forecasted vibration levels due to on- site construction activities would not exceed the vibration perception threshold of 0.01 in/sec over the range of one to one hundred Hertz (Hz) .

724 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 2 Noise Study City of Glendale April 2024

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Project Site is located at 820 North Central Avenue, 212 Arden Avenue, and 208 Arden Avenue in the City of Glendale (City), as shown in Figure 1: Project Location. The proposed Project is located on the southeast corner of North Central Avenue and Arden Avenue.

The Project Site consists of three adjoining parcels: APN 5644-003-081 and APN 5644-003-003 are surface parking lots, and APN 5644- 003-073 contains a vacant restaurant building. The Project S ite is approximately 129,440 square feet (sf), or approximately 2.97 acres, in total. The Project Site is located in downtown Glendale, within the northern portion of the Downtown Specific Plan (DSP) area. The Project Site fronts on North Central Avenue and is bordered by restaurants and a hotel to the north, a hotel to the south, commercia l businesses to the west, and a multi -story parking structure to the east.

There is also a church located to the southwest as well as multi-family residential building.

The Project is a proposed 8 -story residential building with a height of approximately 180 feet. The building would feature eight levels containing 105 residential units, and residential amenity areas, over three levels of subterranean parking. The three levels of parking would contain a total of 192 vehicle parking spaces. Additionally, 11 long -term bicycle parking spaces would be provided. The 105 proposed residential units would include 29 one-bedroom units, 69 two-bedroom units, and 7 three-bedroom units.

A total of 22,546 square feet (sf) of open space, comprised of balconies, publicly accessible open space, and a pool deck would be included. Of the total 22,546 sf of open space provided, 3,469 sf would be publicly accessible open space provided on the ground level along the western boundary of the Project Site and adjacent to the public sidewalk along North Central Avenue.

725 of 918

Project Site
FIGURE 1
SOURCE: Google Earth – 2024
405-001-23

APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET
50250 100
N
Legend
Project Site
726 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 4 Noise Study City of Glendale April 2024

EXISTING CONDITIONS
According to the City’s General Plan Noise Element, the main source of noise in the City is motor vehicle traffic. Other sources of noise in the City of concern include railroad, industrial, commercial, loud car stereos, loud car mufflers, individual buses, lawnmowers and leaf blowers, loud parties, and automotive facilities.

Ambient Noise Levels
Short-term sound monitoring was conducted at f our (4) locations to measure the ambient sound environment in the Project vicinity. Measurements were taken over 15-minute intervals at each location between the hours of 9:12 AM and 10:22 AM on April 17, 2024, and provided in Table 1: Ambient Noise Measurements. Figures 2-5: Noise Monitoring Locations depicts locations where ambient noise measurements were conducted. As shown in Table 1: Ambient Noise Mea surements, ambient noise levels ranged from a low of 57.4 dBA (Leq 15-minute) southwest of the Project Site adjacent to the hotel uses along Arden Avenue (Site 2) to a high of 67.4 dBA (Leq 15-minute) west of the Project Site adjacent to hotel uses along Central Avenue (Site 1).

TABLE 1

AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS
Location
Number/Description Nearest Use Time Period Noise Source dBA
Leq15-
minute
1 West of Project Site
Along Central Avenue
Hotel, Commercial
U
ses 9:29 AM -9:43AM
Vehicle and pedestrian
flow along Central
Avenue

67.4 2 North of the Project Site
along Arden Avenue
Hotel, Commercial
U
ses 9:09 AM -9:24 AM
Vehicle and pedestrian
flow along Arden
Avenue

57.4 3
Southwest of the Project
Site at the corner of
Central Avenue and
Burchett Street
Church, C ommercial
Uses 9:50 AM -10:05 AM
Vehicle and pedestrian
flow along Central
Avenue and Burchett
Street

65.9 4 Southwest of the Project
Site along Burchett St
Multi-family
r
esidential 10:07 AM -10:21 AM
Vehicle and pedestrian
flow along Burchett
Street

58.6 Notes: dBA = A-weighted decibels; Leq = average equivalent sound level.

Source: Refer to Appendix A for noise monitoring data sheets.

Sensitive Uses
The Project Site fronts on North Central Avenue and is bordered by restaurants and a hotel to the north, a hotel to the south, commercial businesses to the west, and a multi-story parking structure to the east.

Residential uses also exist along Burchett Street. An overview of the surrounding land uses relative to the noise monitoring location in Table 1 above is provided below. Additionally, refer to Figure 6:

Sensitive Receptor Map for location of the sensitive uses described below:
727 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 5 Noise Study City of Glendale April 2024
• Noise Monitoring Site 1: Located along the west side of the Project Site along North Central Avenue, sensitive uses include the hotel uses (zoned DSP/Gateway) located adjacent to the south of Project Site.
• Noise Monitoring Site 2 : L ocated north of the Project Site across Arden Avenue, sensitive uses include the hotel uses (zoned DSP/Gateway) located along Arden Avenue. • Noise Monitoring Site 3: L ocated southwest of the Project Site at the corner of North Central Avenue and Burchett Street, sensitive uses include the church (zoned C2 II, Community Commercial Height District II) located along North Central Avenue.
• Noise Monitoring Site 4: Lo cated southwest of the Project Site along Burchett Street, sensitive uses include the multi-family uses (zoned R 1250, High Density Residential) located along Burchett Street.

Vibration Conditions
Based on field observations, the primary source of existing ground- borne vibration in the vicinity of the Project Site is vehicle traffic on local roadways. According to the Federal Transit Administration,1 typical road traffic–induced vibration levels are unlikely to be perceptible by people. Trucks and buses typically generate ground-borne vibration velocity levels of approximately 63 VdB (at a 50- foot distance), and these levels could reach 72 VdB when trucks and buses pass over bumps in the road. A vibration level of 72 VdB is above the 60 VdB level of perceptibility.

1 Federal Transit Administration (FTA). Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. FTA report no. 0123. September 2018.

Accessed February 2024. https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/research-innovation/118131/transit- noise-and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-report-no-0123_0.pdf. 728 of 918

Noise Monitoring Location (Site 1)
FIGURE 2
405-001-23
SOURCE: Google Earth - 2024
Site 1
North
South
West
East
N Project Site
729 of 918

Noise Monitoring Location (Site 2)
FIGURE 3
405-001-23
SOURCE: Google Earth - 2024
North
South
West
East
N Project Site
Site 2
730 of 918

Noise Monitoring Location (Site 3)
FIGURE 4
405-001-23
SOURCE: Google Earth - 2024
North
South
West
East
N Project Site
Site 3
731 of 918

Noise Monitoring Location (Site 4)
FIGURE 5
405-001-23
SOURCE: Google Earth - 2024
North
South
West
East
N Project Site
Site 4
732 of 918

Sensitive Receptors
FIGURE 6
SOURCE: Google Earth – 2024
405-001-23

APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET
150750 300
N
Legend
Project Site
Hotel Uses
Residential Uses
733 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 11 Noise Study City of Glendale April 2024

METHODOLOGY
Ambient Noise Measurements
Noise-level monitoring was conducted by Meridian Consultants on April 16, 2024, at four (4) locations within the Project area vicinity, as shown in Figures 2 through 5. Noise-level monitoring was conducted for 15-minute intervals at each location using a Larson Davis Model 831 sound -level meter. This meter satisfies the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard for general environmental noise measurement instrumentation. The ANSI specifies several types of sound-level meters according to their precision. Types 1, 2, and 3 are referred to as “precision,” “general -purpose,” and “survey” meters, respectively. Most measurements carefully taken with a Type 1 sound- level meter will have a margin of error not exceeding 1 dB.

The Larson Davis Model 831 is a Type 1 precision sound -level meter. This meter meets all requirements of ANSI S1.4 -1983 and ANSI1.43- 1997 Type 1 standards, as well as International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) IEC61672 -1 Ed. 1.0, IEC60651 Ed 1.2, and IEC60804 Type 1, Group X standards. The sound-level meter was located approximately five feet above ground and was covered with a Larson Davis windscreen. The sound-level meter was field calibrated with an external calibrator prior to operation.

Construction
Future dates represent approximations based on the general Project timeline and are subject to change pending unpredictable circumstances that may arise. As such, for purposes of this analysis, Project construction is assumed to begin January 2026 and is expected to last until January 2029 . Construction would occur over the following phases: (1) demolition; (2) grading; (3) building construction; (4) paving; and (5) architectural coating.

Each phase of construction would result in varying levels of intensity and a number of construction personnel. The construction workforce would consist of approximately 10 worker trips per day and approximately 41 hauling trip per day during demolition; approximately 8 worker trips per day and 35 hauling trips during grading; approximately 109 worker trips per day and 24 vendor trips per day during building construction; approximately 18 worker trips per day during paving; and approximately 22 worker trips per day during architectural coating.

On- Site Construction Equipment
Construction activities typically generate noise from the operation of equipment within the Project Site that is required for the construction of various facilities. Noise impacts from on -site construction equipment as well as the on-site staging of construction trucks were evaluated by determining the noise levels generated by different types of construction activity and calculating the construction-related noise level at nearby noise-sensitive receptor locations. Actual construction noise levels would vary, depending upon the equipment type, model, the type of work activity being performed, and the condition of the equipment.
734 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 12 Noise Study City of Glendale April 2024
In order to calculate construction noise levels, hourly activity or utilization factors (i.e., the percentage of normal construction activity that would occur, or construction equipment that would be active, during each hour of the day) are estimated based on the temporal characteristics of other previous and current construction projects. The hourly activity factors express the percentage of time that construction activities would emit average noise levels. Typical noise levels for each type of constructio n equipment were obtained from the FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model. 2 An inventory of construction equipment, including the number and types of equipment, which would be operating simultaneously within the Project Site was identified for each phase/component of construction and shown in Table 2: Construction Equipment by Phase. It is highly unlikely that all pieces of construction equipment identified in Table 2 would operate simultaneously in any specific location during construction because equipment is generally operated only when needed and space constraints limit the equipment that can be used at any one time in a specific location. Therefore, this modeling i s considered a conservative approach to calculate the maximum noise levels that would be generated.

TABLE 2

CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT BY PHASE

Construction
Phase
Equipment Type Quantity Usage Hours
(per day)
Noise Level
at 25 feet
(dBA Leq-
1hour)
Calculated
Average
Noise Level
(dBA Leq
1-hour)
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8 88.6

92.5 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1 83.7
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6 89.0
Grading
Graders 1 6 87.0

90.6 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6 83.7
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7 86.0
Building
Construction
Cranes 1 4 78.6

93.3 Forklifts 2 6 91.0
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 89.1
Paving
Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6 86.9

90.3 Pavers 1 7 80.2
Rollers 1 7 79.0
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7 86.0
Architectural
Coating Air Compressors 1 6 79.7 79.7

Refer to Appendix B for construction noise worksheets.

Source: FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM) version 1.1.

2 US Department of Transportation. FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model Final Report. January 2006. Accessed February 2024. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/noise/construction_noise/rcnm/rcnm.pdf 735 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 13 Noise Study City of Glendale April 2024
The calculated average noise levels provided in Table 2 were inputted into the noise model SoundPLAN,3 which generates computer simulations of noise propagation from sources such as construction noise.

SoundPLAN forecasts noise levels at specific receptors using sound power data and three- dimensional topographical data.

Construction noise levels have been calculated at each of the analyzed sensitive receptors as follows:
(1) construction noise levels generated during each of the three construction phases; and (2) construction noise levels during those periods when the thr ee construction phases could potentially occur concurrently.

Construction Traffic Noise
The analysis of off-site construction traffic noise impacts focuses on: (1) identifying major roadways that may be used for construction worker commute routes or truck haul routes; (2) identifying the nature and location of noise -sensitive receptors along those routes; and (3) evaluating the traffic characteristics along those routes, specifically as related to existing traffic volumes.

Construction Equipment Vibration
Construction activity can result in varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the equipment and methods employed. Operation of construction equipment causes ground vibrations that spread through the ground and diminish in strength with distance. While ground vibrations from construction activities do not often reach the levels that can damage structures, fragile buildings must receive special consideration.

Impacts due to construction activities were evaluated by identifying vibration sources (i.e., construction equipment), measuring the distance between vibration sources and surrounding structure locations, and making a significance determination.

For quantitative construction vibration assessments related to perception, vibration source levels for construction equipment are taken from the FTA Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. 4 3 SoundPLAN model is in compliance with ISO 9613 -2 standards for assessing attenuation of sound propagating outdoors and general calculation method.
4 FTA. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. September 2018. 736 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 14 Noise Study City of Glendale April 2024

REGULATORY COMPLIANCE MEASURES
Noise levels generated by on- site construction equipment can be reduced via Regulatory Compliance Measures (RCMs), which are existing requirements and reasonably anticipated standard conditions based on local, State, or federal regulations and laws that ar e frequently required independently of CEQA review and serve to offset or prevent specific impacts. RCMs are not included as mitigation measures in the environmental clearance document because the Project is required to comply with RCMs through State and local regulations.

RCMs are specific noise control measures which include the following : (1) muffler requirements; (2) equipment modifications that reduce noise levels ; and (3) maintenance and operational requirements.

These noise control measures can be used separately or in combination in order to reduce the noise levels generated by on-site construction equipment.

Most on-site construction-related noise originates from equipment powered by either gasoline or diesel engines. A large part of the noise emitted is due to the intake and exhaust portions of the engine cycle.

Reducing noise from this source can be achieved via muffler systems. This noise control strategy would include the replacement of worn mufflers and retrofitting on-site construction equipment where mufflers are not in use. Using muffler systems on on-site construction equipment reduces construction noise levels by 10 dBA or more.
5 Another effective method of diminishing noise levels associated with individual pieces of construction equipment is by modifying the equipment. Modifications such as the dampening of metal surfaces is effective in reducing on-site construction equipment noise levels. These modifications are typically done by the manufacturer or with factory assistance. Noise reductions of up to 5 dBA are achieved using dampening materials.6
Additionally, faulty or damaged mufflers, loose engine parts, rattling screws, bolts, or metal plates all contribute to increasing the noise level of on -site construction equipment. Regularly inspecting on-site construction equipment for these conditions and making adjustments to the equipment as necessary can also reduce noise levels generated by on-site construction equipment.

5 Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Special Report—Measurement, Prediction, and Mitigation. June 2017. Accessed February 2024. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/Environment/noise/construction_noise/special_report/hcn04.cfm. 6 FHWA. Special Report—Measurement, Prediction, and Mitigation. June 2017. 737 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 15 Noise Study City of Glendale April 2024
RCM-1 Adherence to Existing Noise Standards
The Proposed Project shall comply with the City of Glendale General Plan Noise Element, the City of Glendale Noise Ordinance, and any subsequent ordinances that prohibit the emission or creation of noise beyond certain levels at adjacent uses.

To implement RCM-1 and reduce construction noise, the Contractor would be required to implement reduction measures, which may include but are not limited to:
• Schedule construction activities to avoid operating similar pieces of equipment simultaneously, to achieve a minimum noise reduction of 1.5 dBA. • Retrofit mobile equipment with optimal muffler systems capable of reducing construction noise levels by 10 dBA or more.
• Dampen mobile equipment capable of reducing construction noise levels by a minimum of 5 dBA.
• Enclose stationary equipment with shields such as sound skins that are capable of achieving reduction of 20 dBA at high frequencies and 10 dBA in the middle frequency range or sound aprons capable of achieve noise reductions of up to 10 dBA. • Locate all construction areas for staging and warming up as far as possible from adjacent residential buildings and sensitive receivers.

RCM-2 Construction Hours
The Proposed Project shall comply with Section 8.36.080 of the GMC, which prohibits construction between the hours of 7:00 PM on one day to 7:00 AM of the next day or from 7:00 PM on Saturday to 7:00 AM on Monday or from 7:00 PM preceding a holiday to 7:00 AM.

738 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 16 Noise Study City of Glendale April 2024

THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
In accordance with Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines, a project would have a potentially significant impact related to noise and groundborne vibration if it would result in:
• Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
• Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines also includes:
• For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise? The Project Site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not located within two miles of public airport or public use airport, nor is it within the vicinity of private airstrips. The nearest public or private airport/airstrip to the Project Site is Hollywood Burbank Airport located approximately over six miles northwest of the Project Site. As such, the Project would result in no impacts to this screening criteria and no further analyses of this topic is necessary.

Construction Noise
The City’s General Plan and GMC do not establish numeric acceptable source noise levels or noise level increases at potentially affected receivers. Section 8.36.080 of the GMC regulates construction noise and specifies restrictions from work occurring within certain time periods and specifies dBA limits. Goal 4 of the City’s General Plan establishes policies and programs to change the permitted hours of construction to address concerns expressed by residents about disturbing noise from construction activities on the weekends. To evaluate whether the Project will generate a substantial periodic increase in short -term noise levels at off-site sensitive receiver locations, a construction-related noise level threshold is adopted from the Criteria for Recommended Standard: Occupational Noise Exposure prepared by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). A division of the U S Department of Health and Human Services, NIOSH identifies a noise level threshold based on the duration of exposure to the source.

The construction-related noise level threshold starts at 85 dBA for more than eight hours per day, and for every 3 dBA increase, the exposure time is cut in half. This results in noise level thresholds of 88 dBA for more than four hours per day, 92 dBA for more than one hour per day, 96 dBA for more than 30 minutes per day, and up to 100 dBA for more than 15 minutes per day. For the purposes of this analysis, the lowest, more conservative construction noise level threshold of 85 dBA Leq is used as an acceptable threshold for construction noise at the nearby sensitive receiver locations. Since this construction-related noise level threshold represents the energy average of the noise source over a given time period, they are expressed as Leq noise levels. Therefore, the noise level threshold of 85 dBA Leq over a period of 739 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 17 Noise Study City of Glendale April 2024
eight hours or more is used to evaluate the potential Project-related construction noise level impacts at the nearby sensitive receiver locations.

Operation al Noise
The City’s General Plan Noise Element is used to establish satisfactory noise levels of significance for land uses within the City. The exterior noise level criteria for normally acceptable multi -family residential uses range between 50 to 65 dBA CNEL and conditionally acceptable range between 60 to 70 dBA CNEL.7
There is no completely satisfactory way to measure the subjective effects of noise or of the corresponding human reactions of annoyance and dissatisfaction. This is primarily because of the wide variation in individual thresholds of annoyance and differing individual experiences with noise. Thus, an important way of determining a person’s subjective reaction to a new noise is the comparison of it to the existing environment (ambient) to which one has adapted.

In general, the more a new noise exceeds the previously existing ambient noise level, the less acceptable the new noise will typically be judged. As such, the Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (FICON) developed guidance to be used for the assessment of project -generated increases in noise levels that take into account the ambient noise level. Although the FICON recommendations were specifically developed to assess aircraft noise impacts, these recommendations are often used in environmental noise impact assessments involving the use of cumulative noise exposure metrics, such as the average daily noise level (i.e., CNEL). FICON identifies a readily perceptible 5 dBA or greater project -related noise level increase is considered a significant impact when the noise criteria for a given land use is exceeded.

According to FICON, in areas where the without project noise levels range from 60 to 65 dBA, a 3 dBA barely perceptible noise level increase appears to be appropriate for most people. When the without project noise levels already exceed 65 dBA, any increase in community noise louder than 1.5 dBA or greater is considered a significant impact if the noise criteria for a given land use is exceeded, since it likely contributes to an existing noise exposure exceedance.

7 City of Glendale. “Table 1: Noise/Land Use Compatibility Table.” Noise Element. Accessed February 2024. https://www.glendaleca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/828/635231021922170000. 740 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 18 Noise Study City of Glendale April 2024
Ground borne Vibration
Construction activity can result in varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the equipment and methods employed. Operation of construction equipment causes ground vibrations that spread through the ground and diminish in strength with distance. Bu ildings founded on the soil near the construction site respond to these vibrations with varying results, ranging from no perceptible effects at the lowest levels, low rumbling sounds and perceptible vibrations at moderate levels, and slight damage at the highest levels.

Section 8.36.210 of the GMC prohibits vibration to exceed the perception threshold at or beyond the property boundary of the source or at 150 feet from the source if on a public space or public right of way. Additionally, the City defines vibration perception threshold as the minimal ground or structure borne vibration motion necessary to cause a normal person to be aware of the vibration by such direct means as, but not limited to, sensation by touch or visual observation of moving objects. The perception is presumed to be a motion velocity of 0.01 in/sec over the range of one to one hundred Hz.

741 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 19 Noise Study City of Glendale April 2024

IMPACT ANALYSIS
Construction
On- Site Construction Noise
Noise from construction activities would be affected by the amount of construction equipment, the location of this equipment, the timing and duration of construction activities, and the relative distance to noise -sensitive receptors. Construction activities that would occur during the construction phases would generate both steady -state and episodic noise that would be heard both on and off the Project Site. Each construction phase involves the use of different types of construction equipment and, therefore, has its own distinct noise characteristics. The Project would be constructed using typical construction techniques; no blasting or impact pile driving would be required.

The construction equipment reference noise levels provided in Table 2 are based on measured noise data compiled by the FHWA and would occur when equipment is operating under full power conditions.

However, equipment used on construction sites typically operate at less than full power. The acoustical usage factor is the percentage of time that each type of construction equipment is anticipated to be in full power operation during a typical construction day. These values are estimates and will vary based on the actual construction process and schedule.

Construction equipment operates at its noisiest levels for certain percentages of time during operation.

As such , equipment would operate at different percentages over the course of an hour. 8 During a
construction day, the highest noise levels would be generated when multiple pieces of construction equipment are operated concurrently.

To characterize construction-period noise levels, the average (hourly Leq) noise level associated with each construction stage was calculated based on the quantity, type, and usage factors for each type of equipment that would be used during each construction stage. These noise levels are typically associated with multiple pieces of equipment operating simultaneously.

The estimated construction noise levels were calculated for each of the analyzed receptors (refer to Figure 6) during each of the construction phases. As mentioned previously, given the physical size of the Project Site and logistical limitations, and with the noise equipment located at the construction area nearest to the affected receptors to present a conservative impact analysis. This is considered a worst - case evaluation because construction of the Project would typically use fewer pieces of equipment simultaneously at any given time as well as operating throughout the construction site (i.e., most of the time construction equipment would be operating at distances further away from the off -site receptors

8 FHWA. Traffic Noise Model. 2006.
742 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 20 Noise Study City of Glendale April 2024
than that assumed in the forecasting of Project construction noise levels). As such, Project construction would often generate lower noise levels than reported herein.

Table 3: Construction Maximum Noise Estimates presents the maximum noise impacts that are forecasted to occur at each of the receptor sites. As shown, average noise levels during construction would result in a maximum increase of 1.1 dBA (Leq 1-hour) above the significance threshold of 85 dBA during the building construction phase west of the Project Site at the adjacent hotel building to the south of the Project Site (Site 1) without implementation of technically feasible noise reduction measure as mentioned in Section 8.36.290(K) of the GMC.

TABLE 3

CONSTRUCTION MAXIMUM NOISE ESTIMATES
Location
Calculated Noise Level (Leq-1hour) by Construction Phase Significance
Threshold
Maximum
Increase Above
Significance
Threshold Demolition Grading Building
Construction Paving Architectural
Coating
Site 1 77.3 83.4 86. 1 83.1 72.5 85.0 +1.1
Site 2 74.6 79.3 81. 8 79.0 68.4 85.0 --
Site 3 46.2 64.0 66. 7 63.7 53.1 85.0 --
Site 4 60.5 66.3 69. 0 66.0 55.4 85.0 --

Refer to Appendix B for Construction Noise Worksheets.

As mentioned previously, i n devising construction noise control strategies, important options include controlling the noise at the source. Source control requirements include added benefits in promoting technological advances in the development of quieter equipment. Source control techniques can include:
(1) muffler requirements, (2) maintenance and operational requirements, and (3) equipment emission level requirements. These control techniques can be used separately or in combination in order to achieve the desired results. Most control noise originates from equipment powered by either gasoline or diesel engines. A large part of the noise emitted is due to the intake and exhaust portions of the engine cycle. A remedy for controlling much of the engine noise is the specification and use of optimal muffler systems. RCM-1 would lead to replacement of worn mufflers and to retrofitting where mufflers are not in use. Using optimal muffler systems on all equipment would reduce construction noise levels by 10 dBA or more.
9 Other effective methods of diminishing the noise impacts associated with individual pieces of construction equipment is to employ less noisy machinery. This is accomplished by specifying the quietest available equipment. Modifications such as dampening of metal surfaces or a redesign of a particular piece of equipment is effective in reducing noise due to vibration. These modifications are typically conducted by the manufacturer or with factory assistance. The reduction is controlled by the imposed limits on the technical capabilities of the manufacturer or the equipment user. Noise reductions of up to

9 FHWA. Special Report—Measurement, Prediction, and Mitigation. June 2017. 743 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 21 Noise Study City of Glendale April 2024
5 dBA can be achieved using dampening materials.10 Additionally, shields such as sound skins may achieve reductions of 20 dBA at high frequencies and 10 dBA in the middle frequency range. Sound aprons may achieve noise reductions of up to 10 dBA. 11 Sound aprons are typically designed from absorptive mats and are draped on the frames attached to the equipment. This material can be constructed from polyvinyl chloride (PVC) layers, lead -filled fabric, or rubber. These aprons are most useful when equipm ent only needs partial shielding or has to be regularly moved.

Additionally, limiting the number of noise -generating, heavy -duty construction equipment to two (2) pieces operating simultaneously would reduce construction noise levels by approximately 5 dBA.

With Implementation of RCM-1, construction noise levels resulting in a maximum increase of 1.1 dBA (Leq-1hour) above the significance threshold would be reduced by a minimum of 30 dBA (Leq 1- hour).

Moreover, with implementation of RCM -2, the Project would comply with Section 8.36.080 of the GMC by ensuring that the operation of construction equipment would only occur between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM on weekdays and Saturdays. Compliance with the aforementioned practices would ensure construction noise levels would be below the significance threshold; thus, construction noise levels would not be considered significant.

Off-Site Construction Noise
Construction of the Project would require worker, haul, and vendor truck trips to and from the site to export soil and deliver supplies to the site. Trucks traveling to and from the Project Site would be required to travel along a haul route approved by the City. At maximum, a pproximately 41 hauling trips per day would take place during the grading phase based on construction schedule assumptions . Haul truck traffic would take the most direct route to the freeway ramp along North Central Avenue.

Noise associated with construction truck trips were estimated using the Caltrans FHWA Traffic Noise Model based on the maximum number of worker and truck trips in a day. Project haul truck trips, which includes medium- and heavy-duty trucks, would generate noise levels of approximately 47.3 to 58.2 dBA, respectively, measured at a distance of 25 feet from the adjacent sensitive receptor. As shown in Table 1, existing noise levels ranged from a low of 57.4 dBA (Leq 15-minute) southwest of the Project Site adjacent to the hotel uses along Arden Avenue (Site 2) to a high of 67.4 dBA (Leq 15-minute) west of the Project Site adjacent to hotel uses along Central Avenue (Site 1). The noise level increases from truck trips would be below the significance threshold of 5 dBA. As such, off -site construction noise impacts would not be considered significant.

10 FHWA. Special Report—Measurement, Prediction, and Mitigation. June 2017. 11 FHWA. Special Report—Measurement, Prediction, and Mitigation. June 2017. 744 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 22 Noise Study City of Glendale April 2024
Construction Vibration
As mentioned previously, Section 8.36.210 of the GMC prohibits vibration to exceed the perception threshold at or beyond the property boundary of the source or at 150 feet from the source if on a public space or public right of way. As such, for purposes of this analysis, impacts would be considered significant if construction vibration levels exceed 0.01 inches per second (in/sec) for residential and buildings where people normally sleep.

As shown in Table 4: On-Site Construction Vibration Impacts the forecasted vibration levels due to on- site construction activities would not exceed vibration perception threshold of 0.01 in/sec for at the adjacent residential uses. Additionally, compliant with State regulations, construction activities would include best practices which includes techniques to reduce friction, thus making the penetration for a large range of soils to be less vibration intensive. Impacts resulting from on-site construction vibration would not be considered significant.

TABLE 3

ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION IMPACTS
Site Nearest Off-Site
Building Structures
Estimated Vibration Velocity Levels at the
Nearest Off-Site Structures from the Project
Construction Equipment
Significance
Threshold
Exceeds
Threshold?
Loaded Trucks Small bulldozer
1 Hotel uses to the
southa 0.008 0.002 0.01 No
2 Hotel uses to the
northa 0.008 0.001 0.01 No
3 Church uses to the
southwest 0.001 0.000 0. 01 No
4 Multi-family
residential uses to
the southwest

0.000 0.000 0. 01 No

a - Assumed loaded trucks would not occur within 45 feet of nearest sensitive receptors.

Refer to Appendix C for construction vibration worksheets.

Operation
Fixed Mechanical Equipment Noise
The Project would introduce various stationary noise sources , including heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems, which would be located either on the roof, the side of a structure, or on the ground. All Project mechanical equipment would be required to be designed with appropriate noise- control devices—such as sound attenuators, acoustics louvers, or sound screens/parapet walls—to comply with noise-limitation requirements provided in the GMC. 745 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 23 Noise Study City of Glendale April 2024
The stationary equipment would be required to comply with GMC Section 30.34.070, which establishes low-sound intensities from mechanical equipment. Therefore, operation of mechanical equipment on the Project building would not exceed the City’s threshold o f significance and impacts would be less than significant.

Cumulative
For purposes of this analysis, development of any related projects will be considered to contribute to cumulative noise impacts. Noise, by definition, is a localized phenomenon and drastically reduces as distance from the source increases. As a result, only related projects, and growth in the general area of the Project Site (within 500 feet) would contribute to cumulative noise impacts. Cumulative construction-noise impacts have the potential to occur when multiple construction projects in the local area generate noise within the same timeframe and contribute to the local ambient noise environment.

It is expected that, as with the Project, any related projects would adhere to Section 8.36.290(K) of the GMC and implement noise reduction techniques such as mufflers, shields, sound barriers, w hich would minimize any noise -related nuisances during construction. In addition, distance attenuation and intervening structures would further reduce construction noise levels and not result in noticeable increases. Therefore, the combined construction- noise impacts of related projects within a 0.5 -mile radius and the Project’s contribution would not cause a significant cumulative impact.

746 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 24 Noise Study City of Glendale April 2024

CERTIFICATION
The contents of this noise study represent an accurate depiction of the noise environment and impacts associated with the proposed 820 Central Avenue Residential Project . The information contained in this noise study is based on the best available information at the time of preparation. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at (818) 415-7274.

Sincerely,

Christ Kirikian, INCE Nikki Heredia
Principal | Director of Air Quality & Acoustics Project Environmental Scientist [email protected] [email protected]

747 of 918

APPENDIX A
Noise Monitoring Data Sheets
748 of 918

Monitoring Location: Site 1
Monitoring Date: 4/16/2024
Monitoring Period
Time LAeq LASmax LASmin
9:29:50 66.4 73.4 57.9
9:29:50 66.3 73.3 56.6
9:30:50 69.3 77.1 60.3
9:31:50 69.6 78.3 59.6
9:32:50 64.8 71.5 57.2
9:33:50 70.4 77.4 61.2
9:34:50 66.1 72.8 58.4
9:35:50 65.2 71.2 59
9:36:50 67.6 74.3 58.6
9:37:50 66.1 73.3 58.3
9:38:50 66.3 74.4 58.1
9:39:50 69.2 77.3 58.7
9:40:50 68.1 74.7 57.9
9:41:50 67.1 72.9 59.7
9:42:50 61.4 67.3 56.4
9:43:50 62.3 62.1 61.3
15-minute LAeq 67.4
749 of 918

Monitoring Location: Site 2
Monitoring Date: 4/16/2024
Monitoring Period
Time LAeq LASmax LASmin
9:09:35 55.1 63.7 51.5
9:09:49 58.3 65.1 52.3
9:12:06 58.4 67.2 55.6
9:12:07 58.5 68 55.2
9:13:07 56.1 65.4 52.6
9:14:07 58.1 68 51.8
9:15:07 59.2 66.6 53.6
9:16:07 54 56.7 51.6
9:17:07 55 57.2 53.1
9:18:07 53.7 57.1 51.8
9:19:07 60.2 69.8 54.4
9:20:07 57 65.7 51.7
9:21:07 56.3 62.2 51.3
9:22:07 58 66.6 52.1
9:23:07 57.3 66 53.2
9:24:07 57.7 67.7 52.9
15-minute LAeq 57.4
750 of 918

Monitoring Location: Site 3
Monitoring Date: 4/16/2024
Monitoring Period
Time LAeq LASmax LASmin
9:50:45 64.2 68.7 60.4
9:51:45 64.6 68.0 61.1
9:52:45 65.2 71.9 62.2
9:53:45 66.7 75.9 60.7
9:54:45 67 69.7 62.9
9:55:45 66.8 74.3 62.0
9:56:45 66.6 70.5 60.4
9:57:45 65.8 73.8 59.9
9:58:45 65.8 71.8 59.4
9:59:45 66.5 72.0 62.4
10:00:45 67.3 73.0 61.1
10:01:45 65.8 73.5 59.7
10:02:45 67.3 76.0 60.2
10:03:45 64.4 69.0 60.6
10:04:45 65.9 71.4 59.1
10:05:45 61.7 65.0 61.2
15-minute LAeq 65.9
751 of 918

Monitoring Location: Site 4
Monitoring Date: 4/16/2024
Monitoring Period
Time LAeq LASmax LASmin
10:07:52 61.1 67.9 55.9
10:07:52 58.3 62.5 56
10:08:52 58.7 63.5 56.3
10:09:52 59.8 67.3 56.5
10:10:52 57.4 58.9 55.5
10:11:52 59.3 69.2 55.5
10:12:52 57.9 63.9 55.9
10:13:52 59.1 64.1 55.8
10:14:52 60.6 68.2 55.7
10:15:52 56.8 63.2 54
10:16:52 58.5 65.8 55.5
10:17:52 57.4 61.9 54.5
10:18:52 56.7 62.4 54.8
10:19:52 57.1 63.2 54.9
10:20:52 57.1 62.3 54.5
10:21:52 57.9 57.5 57.1
15-minute LAeq 58.6
752 of 918

APPENDIX B
Construction Noise Worksheets
753 of 918

Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1
Report date:4/19/2024
Case Description:820 Central Residential Project - Demolition ---- Receptor #1 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Hotel Residential 85 85 85
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 15 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 15 0
Tractor No 40 84 15 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 15 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq
Concrete Saw 100 93 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dozer 92.1 88.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Tractor 94.5 90.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Backhoe 88 84 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 100 96.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #2 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Hotel Residential 85 85 85
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 40 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 40 0
Tractor No 40 84 40 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 40 0
754 of 918

Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq
Concrete Saw 91.5 84.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dozer 83.6 79.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Tractor 85.9 82 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Backhoe 79.5 75.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 91.5 87.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #3 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Church Residential 85 85 85
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 250 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 250 0
Tractor No 40 84 250 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 250 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq
Concrete Saw 75.6 68.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dozer 67.7 63.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Tractor 70 66 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Backhoe 63.6 59.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 75.6 71.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #4 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
ResidentialResidential 85 85 85
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
755 of 918

Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 350 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 350 0
Tractor No 40 84 350 0
Backhoe No 40 77.6 350 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq
Concrete Saw 72.7 65.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dozer 64.8 60.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Tractor 67.1 63.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Backhoe 60.7 56.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 72.7 68.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
756 of 918

Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
757 of 918

Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
758 of 918

Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
759 of 918

820 N Central
Mean propagation Leq - Demolition
10 Source type Time
slice
Li
dB(A)
R'w
dB
L'w
dB(A)
Lw
dB(A)
l or A
m,m²
KI
dB
KT
dB
DO
dB
S
m
Adiv
dB
Agr
dB
Abar
dB
Aatm
dB
Amisc
dB
ADI
dB
dLrefl
dB(A)
Ls
dB(A)
Cmet
dB
dLw
dB
ZR
dB
Lr
dB(A)
Receiver Site 1 Fl F4 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 72.2 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 92.5 120.1 577.2 0.0 0.0 3 56.34 -46.0 -0.4 -5.3 -0.1 0.0 0.9 72.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 72.2 Receiver Site 1 Fl F5 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 75.9 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 92.5 120.1 577.2 0.0 0.0 3 56.99 -46.1 -0.1 -1.5 -0.1 0.0 0.5 75.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 75.9 Receiver Site 1 Fl F6 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 77.2 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 92.5 120.1 577.2 0.0 0.0 3 57.76 -46.2 0.0 -0.1 -0.1 0.0 0.5 77.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 77.2 Receiver Site 1 Fl F7 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 77.3 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 92.5 120.1 577.2 0.0 0.0 3 58.63 -46.4 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.6 77.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 77.3 Receiver Site 1 Fl F8 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 77.2 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 92.5 120.1 577.2 0.0 0.0 3 59.62 -46.5 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.7 77.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 77.2 Receiver Site 1 Fl F9 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 77.1 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 92.5 120.1 577.2 0.0 0.0 3 60.75 -46.7 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.8 77.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 77.1 Receiver Site 1 Fl F10 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 77.0 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 92.5 120.1 577.2 0.0 0.0 3 62.00 -46.8 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.9 77.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 77.0 Receiver Site 1 Fl F11 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 76.9 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 92.5 120.1 577.2 0.0 0.0 3 63.35 -47.0 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.9 76.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.9 Receiver Site 1 Fl F12 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 76.7 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 92.5 120.1 577.2 0.0 0.0 3 64.78 -47.2 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.0 1.0 76.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.7 Receiver Site 1 Fl F13 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 76.6 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 92.5 120.1 577.2 0.0 0.0 3 66.32 -47.4 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.0 1.0 76.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.6 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F3 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 67.8 dB(A) SoundPLAN 9.0
Meridian Consultants LLC 1
760 of 918

820 N Central
Mean propagation Leq - Demolition
10 Source type Time
slice
Li
dB(A)
R'w
dB
L'w
dB(A)
Lw
dB(A)
l or A
m,m²
KI
dB
KT
dB
DO
dB
S
m
Adiv
dB
Agr
dB
Abar
dB
Aatm
dB
Amisc
dB
ADI
dB
dLrefl
dB(A)
Ls
dB(A)
Cmet
dB
dLw
dB
ZR
dB
Lr
dB(A)
Area Leq-1ho
ur 92.5 120.1 577.2 0.0 0.0 3 72.28 -48.2 -2.1 -8.2 -0.1 0.0 3.3 67.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 67.8 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F4 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 70.3 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 92.5 120.1 577.2 0.0 0.0 3 72.78 -48.2 -1.3 -5.4 -0.1 0.0 2.3 70.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.3 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F5 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 71.4 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 92.5 120.1 577.2 0.0 0.0 3 73.37 -48.3 -0.5 -4.0 -0.1 0.0 1.2 71.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 71.4 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F6 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 73.6 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 92.5 120.1 577.2 0.0 0.0 3 74.07 -48.4 -0.1 -1.8 -0.1 0.0 0.9 73.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 73.6 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F7 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 74.4 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 92.5 120.1 577.2 0.0 0.0 3 74.87 -48.5 0.0 -0.8 -0.1 0.0 0.7 74.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 74.4 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F8 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 74.6 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 92.5 120.1 577.2 0.0 0.0 3 75.76 -48.6 0.0 -0.5 -0.1 0.0 0.6 74.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 74.6 Receiver Site 3 - Central Avenue Church Fl G Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 46.2 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 92.5 120.1 577.2 0.0 0.0 3 135.61 -53.6 -4.4 -18.6 -0.3 0.0 0.0 46.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.2 Receiver Site 4 Fl G Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 60.5 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 92.5 120.1 577.2 0.0 0.0 3 172.22 -55.7 -4.5 -2.5 -0.3 0.0 0.4 60.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.5 SoundPLAN 9.0
Meridian Consultants LLC 2
761 of 918

Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1
Report date:4/19/2024
Case Description:820 Central Residential Project - Grading ---- Receptor #1 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Hotel Residential 85 85 85
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Grader No 40 85 15 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 15 0
Tractor No 40 84 15 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq
Grader 95.5 91.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dozer 92.1 88.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Tractor 94.5 90.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 95.5 95 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #2 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Hotel Residential 85 85 85
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Grader No 40 85 40 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 40 0
Tractor No 40 84 40 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA)
Day Evening Night
762 of 918

Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq
Grader 86.9 83 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dozer 83.6 79.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Tractor 85.9 82 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 86.9 86.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #3 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Church Residential 85 85 85
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Grader No 40 85 250 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 250 0
Tractor No 40 84 250 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq
Grader 71 67 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dozer 67.7 63.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Tractor 70 66 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 71 70.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #4 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
ResidentialResidential 85 85 85
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Grader No 40 85 350 0
Dozer No 40 81.7 350 0
Tractor No 40 84 350 0
Results
763 of 918

Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq
Grader 68.1 64.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Dozer 64.8 60.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Tractor 67.1 63.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 68.1 67.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
764 of 918

Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA)
Day Evening Night
765 of 918

Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
766 of 918

Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
767 of 918

820 N Central
Mean propagation Leq - Grading
10 Source type Time
slice
Li
dB(A)
R'w
dB
L'w
dB(A)
Lw
dB(A)
l or A
m,m²
KI
dB
KT
dB
DO
dB
S
m
Adiv
dB
Agr
dB
Abar
dB
Aatm
dB
Amisc
dB
ADI
dB
dLrefl
dB(A)
Ls
dB(A)
Cmet
dB
dLw
dB
ZR
dB
Lr
dB(A)
Receiver Site 1 Fl F4 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 77.5 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.6 125.5 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 44.95 -44.0 -0.2 -7.8 -0.1 0.0 1.1 77.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 77.5 Receiver Site 1 Fl F5 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 81.1 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.6 125.5 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 46.13 -44.3 0.0 -3.6 -0.1 0.0 0.6 81.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 81.1 Receiver Site 1 Fl F6 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 82.7 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.6 125.5 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 47.47 -44.5 0.0 -1.7 -0.1 0.0 0.5 82.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 82.7 Receiver Site 1 Fl F7 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 83.2 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.6 125.5 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 48.94 -44.8 0.0 -0.9 -0.1 0.0 0.5 83.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 83.2 Receiver Site 1 Fl F8 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 83.4 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.6 125.5 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 50.52 -45.1 0.0 -0.5 -0.1 0.0 0.6 83.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 83.4 Receiver Site 1 Fl F9 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 83.3 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.6 125.5 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 52.19 -45.3 0.0 -0.3 -0.1 0.0 0.6 83.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 83.3 Receiver Site 1 Fl F10 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 83.2 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.6 125.5 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 53.95 -45.6 0.0 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.6 83.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 83.2 Receiver Site 1 Fl F11 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 83.0 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.6 125.5 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 55.77 -45.9 0.0 -0.1 -0.1 0.0 0.6 83.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 83.0 Receiver Site 1 Fl F12 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 82.7 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.6 125.5 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 57.64 -46.2 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.5 82.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 82.7 Receiver Site 1 Fl F13 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 82.4 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.6 125.5 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 59.58 -46.5 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.5 82.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 82.4 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F3 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 73.5 dB(A) SoundPLAN 9.0
Meridian Consultants LLC 1
768 of 918

820 N Central
Mean propagation Leq - Grading
10 Source type Time
slice
Li
dB(A)
R'w
dB
L'w
dB(A)
Lw
dB(A)
l or A
m,m²
KI
dB
KT
dB
DO
dB
S
m
Adiv
dB
Agr
dB
Abar
dB
Aatm
dB
Amisc
dB
ADI
dB
dLrefl
dB(A)
Ls
dB(A)
Cmet
dB
dLw
dB
ZR
dB
Lr
dB(A)
Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.6 125.5 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 78.70 -48.9 -2.1 -7.4 -0.2 0.0 3.6 73.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 73.5 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F4 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 76.0 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.6 125.5 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 79.22 -49.0 -1.3 -4.8 -0.2 0.0 2.7 76.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.0 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F5 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 77.3 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.6 125.5 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 79.86 -49.0 -0.8 -3.2 -0.2 0.0 2.0 77.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 77.3 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F6 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 78.4 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.6 125.5 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 80.61 -49.1 -0.4 -1.9 -0.2 0.0 1.5 78.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 78.4 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F7 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 79.0 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.6 125.5 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 81.44 -49.2 -0.2 -1.1 -0.2 0.0 1.2 79.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 79.0 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F8 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 79.3 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.6 125.5 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 82.37 -49.3 -0.1 -0.6 -0.2 0.0 1.0 79.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 79.3 Receiver Site 3 - Central Avenue Church Fl G Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 64.0 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.6 125.5 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 126.56 -53.0 -4.4 -6.9 -0.2 0.0 0.0 64.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 64.0 Receiver Site 4 Fl G Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 66.3 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.6 125.5 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 158.99 -55.0 -4.5 -2.6 -0.3 0.0 0.3 66.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 66.3 SoundPLAN 9.0
Meridian Consultants LLC 2
769 of 918

Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1
Report date:4/19/2024
Case Description:820 Central Residential Project - Building Construction ---- Receptor #1 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Hotel Residential 85 85 85
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Crane No 16 80.6 15 0
Front End Loader No 40 79.1 15 0
Front End Loader No 40 79.1 15 0
Tractor No 40 84 15 0
Tractor No 40 84 15 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq
Crane 91 83 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Front End Loader 89.6 85.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Front End Loader 89.6 85.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Tractor 94.5 90.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Tractor 94.5 90.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 94.5 95 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #2 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Hotel Residential 85 85 85
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Crane No 16 80.6 40 0
Front End Loader No 40 79.1 40 0
Front End Loader No 40 79.1 40 0
770 of 918

Tractor No 40 84 40 0
Tractor No 40 84 40 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq
Crane 82.5 74.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Front End Loader 81 77.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Front End Loader 81 77.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Tractor 85.9 82 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Tractor 85.9 82 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 85.9 86.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #3 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Church Residential 85 85 85
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Crane No 16 80.6 250 0
Front End Loader No 40 79.1 250 0
Front End Loader No 40 79.1 250 0
Tractor No 40 84 250 0
Tractor No 40 84 250 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq
Crane 66.6 58.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Front End Loader 65.1 61.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Front End Loader 65.1 61.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Tractor 70 66 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Tractor 70 66 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 70 70.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #4 ----
Baselines (dBA)
771 of 918

DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
ResidentialResidential 85 85 85
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Crane No 16 80.6 350 0
Front End Loader No 40 79.1 350 0
Front End Loader No 40 79.1 350 0
Tractor No 40 84 350 0
Tractor No 40 84 350 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq
Crane 63.6 55.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Front End Loader 62.2 58.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Front End Loader 62.2 58.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Tractor 67.1 63.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Tractor 67.1 63.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 67.1 67.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
772 of 918

Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
773 of 918

Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
774 of 918

Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
775 of 918

820 N Central
Mean propagation Leq - Building Construction
10 Source type Time
slice
Li
dB(A)
R'w
dB
L'w
dB(A)
Lw
dB(A)
l or A
m,m²
KI
dB
KT
dB
DO
dB
S
m
Adiv
dB
Agr
dB
Abar
dB
Aatm
dB
Amisc
dB
ADI
dB
dLrefl
dB(A)
Ls
dB(A)
Cmet
dB
dLw
dB
ZR
dB
Lr
dB(A)
Receiver Site 1 Fl F4 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 80.2 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 93.3 128.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 44.95 -44.0 -0.2 -7.8 -0.1 0.0 1.1 80.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 80.2 Receiver Site 1 Fl F5 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 83.8 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 93.3 128.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 46.13 -44.3 0.0 -3.6 -0.1 0.0 0.6 83.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 83.8 Receiver Site 1 Fl F6 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 85.4 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 93.3 128.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 47.47 -44.5 0.0 -1.7 -0.1 0.0 0.5 85.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 85.4 Receiver Site 1 Fl F7 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 85.9 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 93.3 128.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 48.94 -44.8 0.0 -0.9 -0.1 0.0 0.5 85.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 85.9 Receiver Site 1 Fl F8 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 86.1 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 93.3 128.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 50.52 -45.1 0.0 -0.5 -0.1 0.0 0.6 86.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 86.1 Receiver Site 1 Fl F9 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 86.0 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 93.3 128.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 52.19 -45.3 0.0 -0.3 -0.1 0.0 0.6 86.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 86.0 Receiver Site 1 Fl F10 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 85.9 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 93.3 128.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 53.95 -45.6 0.0 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.6 85.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 85.9 Receiver Site 1 Fl F11 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 85.7 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 93.3 128.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 55.77 -45.9 0.0 -0.1 -0.1 0.0 0.6 85.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 85.7 Receiver Site 1 Fl F12 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 85.4 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 93.3 128.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 57.64 -46.2 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.5 85.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 85.4 Receiver Site 1 Fl F13 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 85.1 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 93.3 128.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 59.58 -46.5 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.5 85.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 85.1 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F3 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 76.2 dB(A) SoundPLAN 9.0
Meridian Consultants LLC 1
776 of 918

820 N Central
Mean propagation Leq - Building Construction
10 Source type Time
slice
Li
dB(A)
R'w
dB
L'w
dB(A)
Lw
dB(A)
l or A
m,m²
KI
dB
KT
dB
DO
dB
S
m
Adiv
dB
Agr
dB
Abar
dB
Aatm
dB
Amisc
dB
ADI
dB
dLrefl
dB(A)
Ls
dB(A)
Cmet
dB
dLw
dB
ZR
dB
Lr
dB(A)
Area Leq-1ho
ur 93.3 128.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 78.70 -48.9 -2.1 -7.4 -0.2 0.0 3.6 76.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.2 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F4 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 78.7 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 93.3 128.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 79.22 -49.0 -1.3 -4.8 -0.2 0.0 2.7 78.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 78.7 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F5 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 80.0 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 93.3 128.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 79.86 -49.0 -0.8 -3.2 -0.2 0.0 2.0 80.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 80.0 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F6 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 81.1 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 93.3 128.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 80.61 -49.1 -0.4 -1.9 -0.2 0.0 1.5 81.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 81.1 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F7 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 81.7 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 93.3 128.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 81.44 -49.2 -0.2 -1.1 -0.2 0.0 1.2 81.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 81.7 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F8 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 82.0 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 93.3 128.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 82.37 -49.3 -0.1 -0.6 -0.2 0.0 1.0 82.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 82.0 Receiver Site 3 - Central Avenue Church Fl G Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 66.7 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 93.3 128.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 126.56 -53.0 -4.4 -6.9 -0.2 0.0 0.0 66.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 66.7 Receiver Site 4 Fl G Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 69.0 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 93.3 128.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 158.99 -55.0 -4.5 -2.6 -0.3 0.0 0.3 69.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 SoundPLAN 9.0
Meridian Consultants LLC 2
777 of 918

Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1
Report date:4/19/2024
Case Description:820 Central Residential Project - Paving ---- Receptor #1 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Hotel Residential 85 85 85
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Drum Mixer No 50 80 15 0
Drum Mixer No 50 80 15 0
Drum Mixer No 50 80 15 0
Drum Mixer No 50 80 15 0
Paver No 50 77.2 15 0
Roller No 20 80 15 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq
Drum Mixer 90.5 87.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drum Mixer 90.5 87.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drum Mixer 90.5 87.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drum Mixer 90.5 87.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Paver 87.7 84.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Roller 90.5 83.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 90.5 94.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #2 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Hotel Residential 85 85 85
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Drum Mixer No 50 80 40 0
778 of 918

Drum Mixer No 50 80 40 0
Drum Mixer No 50 80 40 0
Drum Mixer No 50 80 40 0
Paver No 50 77.2 40 0
Roller No 20 80 40 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq
Drum Mixer 81.9 78.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drum Mixer 81.9 78.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drum Mixer 81.9 78.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drum Mixer 81.9 78.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Paver 79.2 76.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Roller 81.9 74.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 81.9 85.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #3 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Church Residential 85 85 85
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Drum Mixer No 50 80 250 0
Drum Mixer No 50 80 250 0
Drum Mixer No 50 80 250 0
Drum Mixer No 50 80 250 0
Paver No 50 77.2 250 0
Roller No 20 80 250 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq
Drum Mixer 66 63 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drum Mixer 66 63 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drum Mixer 66 63 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drum Mixer 66 63 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Paver 63.2 60.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
779 of 918

Roller 66 59 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 66 69.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #4 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
ResidentialResidential 85 85 85
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Drum Mixer No 50 80 350 0
Drum Mixer No 50 80 350 0
Drum Mixer No 50 80 350 0
Drum Mixer No 50 80 350 0
Paver No 50 77.2 350 0
Roller No 20 80 350 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq
Drum Mixer 63.1 60.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drum Mixer 63.1 60.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drum Mixer 63.1 60.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drum Mixer 63.1 60.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Paver 60.3 57.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Roller 63.1 56.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 63.1 67 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
780 of 918

Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
781 of 918

Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
782 of 918

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
783 of 918

820 N Central
Mean propagation Leq - Paving
10 Source type Time
slice
Li
dB(A)
R'w
dB
L'w
dB(A)
Lw
dB(A)
l or A
m,m²
KI
dB
KT
dB
DO
dB
S
m
Adiv
dB
Agr
dB
Abar
dB
Aatm
dB
Amisc
dB
ADI
dB
dLrefl
dB(A)
Ls
dB(A)
Cmet
dB
dLw
dB
ZR
dB
Lr
dB(A)
Receiver Site 1 Fl F4 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 77.2 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.3 125.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 44.95 -44.0 -0.2 -7.8 -0.1 0.0 1.1 77.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 77.2 Receiver Site 1 Fl F5 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 80.8 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.3 125.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 46.13 -44.3 0.0 -3.6 -0.1 0.0 0.6 80.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 80.8 Receiver Site 1 Fl F6 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 82.4 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.3 125.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 47.47 -44.5 0.0 -1.7 -0.1 0.0 0.5 82.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 82.4 Receiver Site 1 Fl F7 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 82.9 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.3 125.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 48.94 -44.8 0.0 -0.9 -0.1 0.0 0.5 82.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 82.9 Receiver Site 1 Fl F8 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 83.1 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.3 125.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 50.52 -45.1 0.0 -0.5 -0.1 0.0 0.6 83.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 83.1 Receiver Site 1 Fl F9 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 83.0 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.3 125.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 52.19 -45.3 0.0 -0.3 -0.1 0.0 0.6 83.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 83.0 Receiver Site 1 Fl F10 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 82.9 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.3 125.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 53.95 -45.6 0.0 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.6 82.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 82.9 Receiver Site 1 Fl F11 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 82.7 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.3 125.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 55.77 -45.9 0.0 -0.1 -0.1 0.0 0.6 82.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 82.7 Receiver Site 1 Fl F12 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 82.4 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.3 125.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 57.64 -46.2 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.5 82.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 82.4 Receiver Site 1 Fl F13 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 82.1 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.3 125.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 59.58 -46.5 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.5 82.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 82.1 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F3 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 73.2 dB(A) SoundPLAN 9.0
Meridian Consultants LLC 1
784 of 918

820 N Central
Mean propagation Leq - Paving
10 Source type Time
slice
Li
dB(A)
R'w
dB
L'w
dB(A)
Lw
dB(A)
l or A
m,m²
KI
dB
KT
dB
DO
dB
S
m
Adiv
dB
Agr
dB
Abar
dB
Aatm
dB
Amisc
dB
ADI
dB
dLrefl
dB(A)
Ls
dB(A)
Cmet
dB
dLw
dB
ZR
dB
Lr
dB(A)
Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.3 125.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 78.70 -48.9 -2.1 -7.4 -0.2 0.0 3.6 73.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 73.2 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F4 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 75.7 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.3 125.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 79.22 -49.0 -1.3 -4.8 -0.2 0.0 2.7 75.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 75.7 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F5 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 77.0 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.3 125.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 79.86 -49.0 -0.8 -3.2 -0.2 0.0 2.0 77.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 77.0 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F6 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 78.1 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.3 125.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 80.61 -49.1 -0.4 -1.9 -0.2 0.0 1.5 78.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 78.1 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F7 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 78.7 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.3 125.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 81.44 -49.2 -0.2 -1.1 -0.2 0.0 1.2 78.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 78.7 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F8 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 79.0 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.3 125.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 82.37 -49.3 -0.1 -0.6 -0.2 0.0 1.0 79.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 79.0 Receiver Site 3 - Central Avenue Church Fl G Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 63.7 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.3 125.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 126.56 -53.0 -4.4 -6.9 -0.2 0.0 0.0 63.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 63.7 Receiver Site 4 Fl G Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 66.0 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 90.3 125.2 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 158.99 -55.0 -4.5 -2.6 -0.3 0.0 0.3 66.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 66.0 SoundPLAN 9.0
Meridian Consultants LLC 2
785 of 918

Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1
Report date:4/19/2024
Case Description:820 Central Residential Project - Architectural Coating ---- Receptor #1 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Hotel Residential 85 85 85
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 15 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq
Compressor (air) 88.1 84.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 88.1 84.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #2 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Hotel Residential 85 85 85
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 40 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq
Compressor (air) 79.6 75.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 79.6 75.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #3 ----
786 of 918

Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
Church Residential 85 85 85
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 250 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq
Compressor (air) 63.7 59.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 63.7 59.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
---- Receptor #4 ----
Baselines (dBA)
DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night
ResidentialResidential 85 85 85
Equipment
Spec Actual Receptor Estimated
Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding
Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA)
Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 350 0
Results
Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq
Compressor (air) 60.8 56.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total 60.8 56.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
*Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value.
787 of 918

Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
788 of 918

Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA)
Day Evening Night
Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
789 of 918

820 N Central
Mean propagation Leq - Architectural Coating
10 Source type Time
slice
Li
dB(A)
R'w
dB
L'w
dB(A)
Lw
dB(A)
l or A
m,m²
KI
dB
KT
dB
DO
dB
S
m
Adiv
dB
Agr
dB
Abar
dB
Aatm
dB
Amisc
dB
ADI
dB
dLrefl
dB(A)
Ls
dB(A)
Cmet
dB
dLw
dB
ZR
dB
Lr
dB(A)
Receiver Site 1 Fl F4 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 66.6 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 79.7 114.6 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 44.95 -44.0 -0.2 -7.8 -0.1 0.0 1.1 66.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 66.6 Receiver Site 1 Fl F5 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 70.2 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 79.7 114.6 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 46.13 -44.3 0.0 -3.6 -0.1 0.0 0.6 70.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.2 Receiver Site 1 Fl F6 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 71.8 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 79.7 114.6 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 47.47 -44.5 0.0 -1.7 -0.1 0.0 0.5 71.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 71.8 Receiver Site 1 Fl F7 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 72.3 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 79.7 114.6 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 48.94 -44.8 0.0 -0.9 -0.1 0.0 0.5 72.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 72.3 Receiver Site 1 Fl F8 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 72.5 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 79.7 114.6 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 50.52 -45.1 0.0 -0.5 -0.1 0.0 0.6 72.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 72.5 Receiver Site 1 Fl F9 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 72.4 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 79.7 114.6 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 52.19 -45.3 0.0 -0.3 -0.1 0.0 0.6 72.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 72.4 Receiver Site 1 Fl F10 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 72.3 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 79.7 114.6 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 53.95 -45.6 0.0 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.6 72.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 72.3 Receiver Site 1 Fl F11 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 72.1 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 79.7 114.6 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 55.77 -45.9 0.0 -0.1 -0.1 0.0 0.6 72.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 72.1 Receiver Site 1 Fl F12 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 71.8 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 79.7 114.6 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 57.64 -46.2 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.5 71.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 71.8 Receiver Site 1 Fl F13 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 71.5 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 79.7 114.6 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 59.58 -46.5 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.0 0.5 71.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 71.5 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F3 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 62.6 dB(A) SoundPLAN 9.0
Meridian Consultants LLC 1
790 of 918

820 N Central
Mean propagation Leq - Architectural Coating
10 Source type Time
slice
Li
dB(A)
R'w
dB
L'w
dB(A)
Lw
dB(A)
l or A
m,m²
KI
dB
KT
dB
DO
dB
S
m
Adiv
dB
Agr
dB
Abar
dB
Aatm
dB
Amisc
dB
ADI
dB
dLrefl
dB(A)
Ls
dB(A)
Cmet
dB
dLw
dB
ZR
dB
Lr
dB(A)
Area Leq-1ho
ur 79.7 114.6 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 78.70 -48.9 -2.1 -7.4 -0.2 0.0 3.6 62.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 62.6 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F4 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 65.1 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 79.7 114.6 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 79.22 -49.0 -1.3 -4.8 -0.2 0.0 2.7 65.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 65.1 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F5 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 66.4 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 79.7 114.6 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 79.86 -49.0 -0.8 -3.2 -0.2 0.0 2.0 66.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 66.4 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F6 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 67.5 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 79.7 114.6 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 80.61 -49.1 -0.4 -1.9 -0.2 0.0 1.5 67.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 67.5 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F7 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 68.1 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 79.7 114.6 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 81.44 -49.2 -0.2 -1.1 -0.2 0.0 1.2 68.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.1 Receiver Site 2 - Hilton Glendale Fl F8 Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 68.4 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 79.7 114.6 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 82.37 -49.3 -0.1 -0.6 -0.2 0.0 1.0 68.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.4 Receiver Site 3 - Central Avenue Church Fl G Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 53.1 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 79.7 114.6 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 126.56 -53.0 -4.4 -6.9 -0.2 0.0 0.0 53.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 53.1 Receiver Site 4 Fl G Leq-1hour dB(A) Leq-1hour 55.4 dB(A) Area Leq-1ho
ur 79.7 114.6 3074.8 0.0 0.0 3 158.99 -55.0 -4.5 -2.6 -0.3 0.0 0.3 55.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 55.4 SoundPLAN 9.0
Meridian Consultants LLC 2
791 of 918

APPENDIX C
Construction Vibration Worksheets
792 of 918

Meridian Consultants LLC 820 N. Central Avenue
Construction Vibration Model
(15 feet)
Rev: 11-12-2012
Equipment Pieces of
Equipment
PPV at 25 feet
(in/sec)
Distance from
Equipment
PPV at
adjusted
distance
RMS velocity
amplitude in
in/sec at
adjusted
distancea
RMS
Vibration
level in
VdB at
adjusted
distance
Caisson drilling 1 0.089 15 0.191 0.048 94
Jackhammer 1 0.035 15 0.075 0.019 85
Large bulldozer 1 0.089 15 0.191 0.048 94
Loaded trucks 1 0.076 45 0.031 0.008 78
Vibratory Roller 1 0.210 15 0.452 0.113 101
Small bulldozer 1 0.003 15 0.006 0.002 64
Suggested Vibration Thresholds per the Federal Transit Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment 793 of 918

Meridian Consultants LLC 820 N. Central Avenue
Construction Vibration Model
(30 feet)
Rev: 11/12/2012
Equipment Pieces of
Equipment
PPV at 25 feet
(in/sec)
Distance from
Equipment
PPV at
adjusted
distance
RMS velocity
amplitude in
in/sec at
adjusted
distancea
RMS
Vibration
level in
VdB at
adjusted
distance
Caisson drilling 1 0.089 30 0.068 0.017 85
Jackhammer 1 0.035 30 0.027 0.007 76
Large bulldozer 1 0.089 30 0.068 0.017 85
Loaded trucks 1 0.076 45 0.031 0.008 78
Vibratory Roller 1 0.210 30 0.160 0.040 92
Small bulldozer 1 0.003 30 0.002 0.001 55
* Suggested Vibration Thresholds per the Federal Transit Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment 794 of 918

Meridian Consultants LLC 820 N. Central Avenue
Construction Vibration Model
(250 feet)
Rev: 11/12/2012
Equipment Pieces of
Equipment
PPV at 25 feet
(in/sec)
Distance from
Equipment
PPV at
adjusted
distance
RMS velocity
amplitude in
in/sec at
adjusted
distancea
RMS
Vibration
level in
VdB at
adjusted
distance
Caisson drilling 1 0.089 250 0.003 0.001 57
Jackhammer 1 0.035 250 0.001 0.000 49
Large bulldozer 1 0.089 250 0.003 0.001 57
Loaded trucks 1 0.076 250 0.002 0.001 56
Vibratory Roller 1 0.210 250 0.007 0.002 64
Small bulldozer 1 0.003 250 0.000 0.000 28
* Suggested Vibration Thresholds per the Federal Transit Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment 795 of 918

Meridian Consultants LLC 820 N. Central Avenue
Construction Vibration Model
(350 feet)
Rev: 11/12/2012
Equipment Pieces of
Equipment
PPV at 25 feet
(in/sec)
Distance from
Equipment
PPV at
adjusted
distance
RMS velocity
amplitude in
in/sec at
adjusted
distancea
RMS
Vibration
level in
VdB at
adjusted
distance
Caisson drilling 1 0.089 350 0.002 0.000 53
Jackhammer 1 0.035 350 0.001 0.000 44
Large bulldozer 1 0.089 350 0.002 0.000 53
Loaded trucks 1 0.076 350 0.001 0.000 51
Vibratory Roller 1 0.210 350 0.004 0.001 60
Small bulldozer 1 0.003 350 0.000 0.000 23
* Suggested Vibration Thresholds per the Federal Transit Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment 796 of 918

APPENDIX C
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Technical Report
797 of 918

IR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS STUDY
820 N. CENTRAL AVENUE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT
820 N. Central Boulevard
Glendale, CA 91203
P
REPARED FOR:

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project i Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024
Table of Contents
Section Page
Executive Summary .................................................................................................... 1 Project Description .................................................................................................... 3 Regulatory Setting ..................................................................................................... 5 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................ 9 Methodology ........................................................................................................... 15 Significance Thresholds .............................................................................................. 20 Impact Analysis ........................................................................................................ 24 Certification ........................................................................................................... 33

Appendix
A CalEEMod Emission Output Files
A.1 Existing
A.2 Proposed

799 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project ii Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024
Figures
Figure Page
1 Project Site Location ........................................................................................ 4 2 Sensitive Receptor Map .................................................................................... 14

Tables
Table Page
1 Air Quality Monitoring Summary ........................................................................... 9 2 South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status ................................................................ 11 3 Existing Operational Air Quality Emissions .............................................................. 11 4 California GHG Inventory 2013−2021 ..................................................................... 12 5 Existing Operational GHG Emissions ...................................................................... 13 6 Construction Thresholds ................................................................................... 20 7 Localized Significance Thresholds ........................................................................ 21 8 Operational Thresholds ..................................................................................... 21 9 Project Construction Schedule ............................................................................ 24 10 Project Construction Diesel Equipment Inventory ...................................................... 25 11 Maximum Construction Emissions ......................................................................... 26 12 Maximum Operational Emissions .......................................................................... 26 13 Localized Construction and Operational Emissions ..................................................... 27 14 Construction GHG Emissions ............................................................................... 29 15 Operational GHG Emisisons ................................................................................ 29 16 Project Consistency with Applicable Glendale General Plan Objectives ............................ 30 17 Project Consistency with Greener Glendale Plan....................................................... 31

800 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this air quality and greenhouse gas analysis is to provide an assessment of the impacts resulting from development of the 820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project (Project) and to identify any measures that may be necessary to reduce potentially significant impacts.

Standard Air Quality, Energy and GHG Regulatory Conditions The proposed Project would be required to comply with the following regulatory conditions from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and State of California (State):

South Coast Air Quality Management District Rules
The following lists the SCAQMD rules that are applicable, but not limited to, the proposed Project :
• Rule 402−Nuisance: Controls the emissions of odors and other air contaminants; • Rule 403−Fugitive Dust: Controls the emissions of fugitive dust; • Rule 1186−Paved Road and Public Unpaved Roads: Controls the emissions of fugitive dust generators; • Rule 1113−Architectural Coating: Establishes VOC content limits; and • Rule 1403−Asbestos Emissions from Demolition/Renovation Activities: Limit asbestos emissions from building demolition and renovation activities, including removal and associated disturbance of asbestos-containing materials (ACM).

State of California Rules
The following lists the State of California Code of Regulations (CCR) air quality emission rules that are applicable, but not limited to, the proposed Project:
• CCR Title 13, Article 4.8, Chapter 9, Section 2449: In use Off-R oad Diesel Vehicles; • CCR Title 13, Section 2025: On-Road Diesel Truck Fleets; • CCR Title 24 Part 6: California Building Energy Standards; and • CCR Title 24 Part 11: California Green Building Standards.

Construction Source Emissions
Construction emissions would not contribute to short - or long-term emissions that would increase the carcinogenic effects on sensitive receptors. Construction -source odor emissions would be temporary, short-term, and intermittent in nature and would not result in persistent impacts that would affect substantial numbers of people. Potential construction-source odor impacts are therefore not considered significant.
801 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 2 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024
Operational Source Emissions
Operational emissions would not contribute to short - or long-term emissions that would increase the carcinogenic effects on sensitive receptors. Emissions associated with operation would not exceed the SCAQMD-recommended thresholds. Thus, the Project would not result in a regional violation of applicable air quality standards or jeopardize the timely attainment of such standards in the South Coast Air Basin (Basin).

Greenhouse Gases
There are no federal, State, or local quantitative adopted thresholds of significance for addressing a project’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In the absence of any adopted numeric threshold, this analysis evaluates the significance of a project by considering whether the project conflicts with applicable regulations or requirements adopted to implement a Statewide, regional, or local plan. The Project is committed to meeting the requirements of the CALGreen Code by incorporating strategies such as low - flow toilets, low-flow faucets, and other energy and resource conservation measures. The Project would comply with applicable energy, water, and waste efficiency measures specified in the Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards and CALGreen standards. The Project would comply with applicable goals and policies in the City’s General Plan and Greener Glendale Plan.

802 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 3 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024

The Project Site consists of three adjoining parcels: APN 5644-003-081 and APN 5644-003-003 are surface parking lots, and APN 5644- 003-073 contains a vacant restaurant building. The Project S ite is approximately 129,440 square feet (sf), or approximately 2.97 acres, in total. The Project Site is located in downtown Glendale, within the northern portion of the Downtown Specific Plan (DSP) area. The Project Site fronts on North Central Avenue and is bordered by restaurants and a hotel to the north, a hotel to the south, commercial businesses to the west, and a multi-story parking structure to the east.

A total of 22,546 sf of open space, comprised of balconies, publicly accessible open space, and a pool deck would be included. Of the total 22,546 sf of open space provided, 3,469 sf would be publicly accessible open space provided on the ground level along the western boundary of the Project Site and adjacent to the public sidewalk along North Central Avenue.

803 of 918

Project Site
FIGURE 1
SOURCE: Google Earth – 2024
405-001-23

APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET
50250 100
N
Legend
Project Site
804 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 5 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024

REGULATORY SETTING
Air Quality
In California, jurisdiction over air quality management, enforcement, and planning is divided among 35 geographic regions. Within each region, a local air district is responsible for oversight of air quality monitoring, modeling, permitting, and enforcement to ensure that regulatory violations are avoided wherever possible.

South Coast Air Quality Management District
The South Coast Air Quality Management District ( SCAQMD) shares responsibility with California Air Resource Board (CARB) for ensuring that all State and federal Ambient Air Quality Standards ( AAQS) are achieved and maintained over an area of approximately 10,743 square miles. This area includes the South Coast and Salton Sea Air Basins, all of Orange County, and the nondesert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. It does not include the Antelope Valley or the nondesert portion of western San Bernardino County.

SCAQMD is responsible for controlling emissions, primarily from stationary sources. SCAQMD maintains air quality monitoring stations throughout the air basins. SCAQMD, in coordination with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), is also responsible for developing, updating, and implementing the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the air basins. An AQMP is a plan prepared and implemented by an air pollution district for a county or region designated as being in nonattainment of the National (N)AAQS or California (C)AAQS. The term “nonattainment area” is used to refer to an air basin in which one or more AAQS are exceeded. SCAQMD also prepares the S tate Implementation Plan (SIP) for its jurisdiction and promulgates rules and regulations. The SIP includes strategies and tactics to be used to attain the federal ozone standards in the Basin. The SIP elements are taken from the most recent AQMP. SCAQMD adopted the 2022 AQMP on December 2, 2022. 1 The AQMP includes transportation
control measures developed by SCAG from its 2020−2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy, as well as the integrated strategies and measures needed to meet the NAAQS.

The AQMP demonstrates attainment of the 1-hour and 8-hour ozone NAAQS, as well as the latest 24-hour and annual particulate matter (PM) 2.5 standards.

SCAQMD is responsible for limiting the number of emissions generated throughout the air basins by various stationary, area, and mobile sources. Specific rules and regulations have been adopted by the SCAQMD Governing Board that identify specific pollution -reduction measures that must be implemented in association with various uses and activities. These rules regulate not only the emissions of the federal and State criteria pollutants , but also toxic air contaminants ( TACs) and acutely hazardous materials.

1 S outh Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Final 2022 Air Quality Management Plan. December 2, 2022.

Accessed March 2024. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/clean-air-plans/air-quality-management-plans/2022-air- quality-management-plan/final-2022-aqmp/final-2022-aqmp.pdf?sfvrsn=10. 805 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 6 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024
The rules are also subject to ongoing refinement by SCAQMD. Among the SCAQMD rules applicable to the Project are Rule 403−Fugitive Dust and Rule 1113−Architectural Coatings. Rule 403 requires the use of stringent best available control measures (BACMs) to minimize PM10 emissions during grading and construction activities. Rule 1113 limits the VOC content of coatings, with a VOC content limit for flat coatings of 50 grams per liter (g/L). 2 Additional details regarding these rules and other potentially applicable rules are presented as follows.

Rule 402−Nuisance. This rule states that a “person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or to the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property.”3
Rule 403−Fugitive Dust. This rule requires fugitive dust sources to implement best available control measures (BACMs) for all sources and prohibits all forms of visible particulate matter from crossing any property line. BACMs may include application of water or chemical stabilizers to disturbed soils covering haul vehicles; restricting vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour (mph); sweeping loose dirt from paved site-access roadways; cessation of construction activity when winds exceed 25 mph; and establishing a permanent ground cover on finished sites. SCAQMD Rule 403 is intended to reduce PM10 emissions from any transportation, handling, construction, or storage activity that has the potential to generate fugitive dust (see also Rule 1186).

Rule 1113− Architectural Coatings . This rule requires manufacturers, distributors, and end users of architectural and industrial maintenance coatings to reduce volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from the use of these coatings, primarily by placing limits on the VOC content of various coating categories.

Rule 1146.2−Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from Large Water Heaters and Small Boilers and Process Heaters. This rule requires manufacturers, distributors, retailers, refurbishers, installers, and operators of new and existing units to reduce nitrogen oxide (Nox) emissions from natural gas-fired water heaters, boilers, and process heaters as defined in this rule.

Rule 1186− PM10 Emissions from Paved and Unpaved Roads, and Livestock Operations. This rule applies to owners and operators of paved and unpaved roads and livestock operations. The rule is intended to reduce PM10 emissions by requiring the cleanup of material deposited onto paved roads, use of certified street sweeping equipment, and treatment of high -use unpaved roads (see also Rule 403 ).

2 SCAQMD. Rule 1113—Architectural Coating. September 6, 2013. Accessed March 2024. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/rule-book/reg-xi/r1113.pdf.
3 SCAQMD. Rule 402—Nuisance. Accessed March 2024. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/rule-iv/rule- 402.pdf.
806 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 7 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024
Stationary emissions sources subject to these rules are regulated through SCAQMD’s permitting process.

Through this permitting process, SCAQMD also monitors the number of stationary emissions being generated and uses this information in developing AQMPs.

City of Glendale General Plan
Local jurisdictions, such as the City, have the authority and responsibility to reduce air pollution through their police power and decision -making authority. With respect to land use decisions, the City is responsible for the assessment of potential air quality impacts and the identification of feasible mitigation measures related to air emissions associated with proposed projects.

The following Glendale General Plan policies, goals and objectives located in the Air Quality Element are applicable to air quality.

Goal 1: Air Quality will be healthful for all residents of Glendale.

Objective 1.a: Reduce Glendale’s contribution to regional emissions in a manner both efficient and equitable to residents and businesses, since emissions generated within Glendale affect regional air quality.

Objective 1.c: Comply with the Air Quality Management Plan prepared by the SCAQMD and SCAG.

Goal 4: The reliance on automobile transportation will be reduced.

Objective 4.b: Promote the use of public transportation and non-polluting transportation in standards for new construction.

Greenhouse gas
Greener Glendale Plan
In March 2012, the City completed the Greener Glendale Plan,4 consisting of the Greener Glendale 2010 Report, the Greener Glendale Plan for Municipal Operations, and the Greener Glendale Plan for Community Activities. The Greener Glendale Plan analyzes City activities related to sustainability and GHG emissions to show how implementing sustainability measures will result in reduced GHG emissions.

The list of quantifiable GHG reduction categories in the Greener Glendale Plan includes 2020 emissions reduction targets to be achieved through California vehicle and fuel standards, building energy efficiency audits and upgrades, smart grid applications, green building standards, Zero Waste Plans, electric vehicle (EV) charging station installation, and a plastic bag ban to name a few. The Greener Glendale Plan identified 2035 reduction targets through continued implementation of California vehicle and fuel standards, building energy and water efficiency audits and upgrades, Zero Waste Plan goal of 90 percent diversion by 2030, tree planning programs, and turf reduction rebates.

4 City of Glendale. “Greener Glendale.” Accessed March 2024. https://www.glendaleca.gov/government/departments/management-services/office-of-sustainability/greener-glendale. 807 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 8 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024
The Greener Glendale Plan incorporates 12 measures in addition to the mandatory Green Building Standards for new construction projects. These measures went into effect on June 7, 2011. The 12 measures include:

1. Ex
pand applicability of green building standards to residential buildings over 3-st ories.

2. Ex
ceed California Energy Code requirements by 15 percent.

3. Reduce baseline water usage by 20 percent.

4. A radian roof barrier shall be installed.

5. Gas fired tankless water heaters shall have an energy factor of at least 0.80.

6. Ga
s-fi
red storage-ta
nk type water heaters shall have an energy factor of at 0.61.

7. Bu
ildings shall be “solar ready.”

8. At least 20 percent of certain paved areas in residential projects shall be permeable.

9. Re
sidential gas-fir
ed heating equipment shall be high efficiency units.

10. Res
idential air conditioning equipment shall be high-efficiency units.

11. Natural light ventilation in residential habitable room shall be increased.

12. New
single-fa
mily dwellings with floor area greater than 5,000 square feet shall be required to meet CALGreen Tier 1.

Ordinance No. 5999
On November 15, 2022 the City of Glendale adopted new reach codes to electrify new construction, increase local solar generation, and increase electric vehicle (EV) charging.5 These ordinances mean that new homes and businesses built in Glendale after January 1, 2023, would be all -electric, with increased capacity to generate local solar power and increased availability of EV charging infrastructure. Ordinance No. 5999 also supports the City’s recent authorization to prepare a Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP) which will aim to reduce communitywide emissions.

The City of Glendale’s Reach Codes require that new homes and businesses built in Glendale after January 1, 2023 be all-electric, with increased capacity to generate local solar power and increased availability of EV charging infrastructure for new non-residential construction. Ordinance No. 5999 also supports the City’s recent authorization to prepare a Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP) which will aim to reduce communitywide emissions.

5 City of Glendale. Ordinance No. 5999. November 15, 2022. 808 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 9 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Ambient air quality emissions present complex environmental issues that require regulatory attention on both large and small scales. The cumulative nature of project-level and localized emissions contributing to greater regional conditions warrants that regulatory policies be instituted on national, State, and regional levels to address air quality concerns. The following sections outline the applicable regulatory framework that exists at the national, State, and regional levels for air quality .

Air Quality
Regional Air Quality
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is the federal agency responsible for overseeing the country’s air quality and setting the NAAQS for the Climate Action Plans (CAPs). The NAAQS were devised based on extensive modeling and monitoring of air pollution across the country; they are designed to protect public health and prevent the formation of atmospheric ozone. Air quality of a region is considered to be in attainment of the NAAQS if the measured ambient air pollutant levels do not exceed the applicable concentration threshold.

As noted previously, CARB is the State agency responsible for setting the CAAQS. Air quality of a region is considered to be in attainment of the CAAQS if the measured ambient air pollutant levels for O3, CO, NO2, SO2, PM10, PM2.5, and Pb are not exceeded, and all other standards are not equaled or exceeded at any time in any consecutive 3-year period.

For evaluation purposes, the SCAQMD territory is divided into 38 source receptor areas (SRAs). These SRAs are designated to provide a general representation of the local meteorological, terrain, and air quality conditions within the particular geographical area. The Project Site is within SRA 7, East San Fernando Valley.
6 The nearest air monitoring station SCAQMD operates is located at 10659 W. Delano Street in North Hollywood. This station monitors O3 and NO2, and PM2.5. The nearest monitoring station to the Project Site that monitors PM10 is located at 1630 N. Main Street within Los Angeles’s Chinatown neighborhood. Table 1: Air Quality Monitoring Summary summarizes published monitoring data from 2020 through 2022, the most recent 3- year period available from these monito ring stations. The data shows that during the past few years, the region has exceeded the O3 and PM10 standards .

TABLE 1

AIR QUALITY MONITORING SUMMARY
Air Pollutant Average Time (Units) 2020 2021 2022
Ozone (O3) State Max 1 hour (ppm) 0.13 3 0.110 0.106

6 SCAQMD. “General Forecast Areas and Air Monitoring Areas.” Accessed March 2024. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/default-document-library/map-of-monitoring-areas.pdf. 809 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 10 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024
TABLE 1

AIR QUALITY MONITORING SUMMARY
Air Pollutant Average Time (Units) 2020 2021 2022
Days > CAAQS threshold (0.09 ppm) 31 6 6
National Max 8 hour (ppm) 0.108 0.089 0.091
Days > NAAQS threshold (0.075 ppm) 50 17 13
State Max 8 hour (ppm) 0.109 0.089 0.092
Days > CAAQS threshold (0.07 ppm) 52 17 15
Nitrogen dioxide (NO2)
National Max 1 hour (ppm) 0.060 0. 065 0.054
Days > NAAQS threshold (0.100 ppm) 0 0 0
State Max 1 hour (ppm) 0.060 0.060 0.054
Days > CAAQS threshold (0.18 ppm) 0 0 0
Respirable particulate matter
(PM10)
National Max (µg/m3) 83.7 64. 0 61.0
National Annual Average (µg/m3) 33.1 26.0 29.4
Days > NAAQS threshold (35 µg/m3) 0 0 0
State Max (µg/m3) 185.2 138.5 43.7
State Annual Average (µg/m3) 34 14 0
Fine particulate matter (PM2.5)
National Max (µg/m3) — — —
National Annual Average (µg/m3) — — —
Days > NAAQS threshold (35 µg/m3) — — —
State Max (µg/m3) 145.3 50.6 43.4
State Annual Average (µg/m3) 16.3 — 13.0

Note: (—) = Data not available.

Source: CARB, iADAM: Air Quality Data Statistics.

USEPA and the CARB designate air basins where AAQS are exceeded as “nonattainment” areas. If standards are met, the area is designated as an “attainment” area. If there is inadequate or inconclusive data to make a definitive attainment designation, they ar e considered “unclassified.” Federal nonattainment areas are further designated as marginal, moderate, serious, severe, or extreme as a function of deviation from standards. The current attainment designations for the Basin are shown in Table 2: South Coas t Air Basin Attainment Status . The Basin is currently designated as being in nonattainment at the federal level for O3 and PM2.5; and at the State level for O3, PM10, and PM2.5. 810 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 11 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024

TABLE 2

SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN ATTAINMENT STATUS
Pollutant State Status National Status
Ozone (O3) Nonattainment Nonattainment
Carbon monoxide (CO) Attainment Unclassified/Attainment Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) Attainment Unclassified/Attainment Sulfur dioxide (SO2) Attainment Unclassified/Attainment Respirable particulate matter (PM10) Nonattainment Attainment Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) Nonattainment Nonattainment

Source: California Air Resources Board (CARB) Area Designation Maps / State and National, https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/documents/maps-state-and-federal-area-designations. Accessed March 2024.

Existing Operational Air Quality Emissions
As mentioned previously, the Project Site consists of three adjoining parcels containing a one -story restaurant building and a surface parking lot . Table 3: Existing Operational Air Quality Emissions identifies the emissions from the existing uses. The most current CARB-approved, SCAQMD-recommended air quality modeling software, the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod version 2022 1.1.22), was used to estimate existing air quality operational emissions.

TABLE 3

EXISTING OPERATIONAL AIR QUALITY EMISSIONS
Source
VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
pounds/day
Mobile 19.2 17.9 184.0 0.4 37.1 9.6
Area 0.2 <0.1 0.3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Energy <0.1 0.2 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
Total 19.4 18.1 184.5 0.4 37.1 9.6
SCAQMD Mass Daily Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold exceeded? No No No No No No

Notes: Totals in table may not appear to add exactly due to rounding in the computer model calculations.

Refer to Appendix A.1: CalEEMod Air Quality Emission Output Files – Existing. 811 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 12 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024
Greenhouse Gas
Regional Greenhouse Gas
California is the second largest contributor of GHGs in the United States and the 16 th largest in the world.101F
7 In 2021, California produced 381.3 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents (MMTCO2e), including imported electricity, and excluding combustion of international fuels and carbon sinks or storage. The major source of GHGs in California is transportation, contributing to approximately 38 percent of the State’s total GHG emissions. The Statewide inventory of GHGs by sector is shown in Table 4: California GHG Inventory 2013−2021.

TABLE 4
CALIFORNIA GHG INVENTORY 2013−2021
Main Sector
Emissions (MMTCO2e)
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Transportation 156.9 157.6 161.2 165.0 166.4 165.2 162.3 135.6 145.6 Industriala,b 82.7 85.0 82.7 81.2 81.4 82.0 80.8 73.3 73.9 Electric Power 94.0 90.3 86.3 70.8 64.4 65.0 60.2 59.5 62.4 Commercial and
Residential 39.0 35.5 37.2 37.7 38.3 37.5 40.6 38.9 38.8 Agriculture 33.7 33.7 32.6 32.1 31.6 32.1 31.3 31.5 30.9 High GWPc,d 17.0 17.9 18.8 19.4 20.1 20.5 20.7 21.3 21.3 Recycled and waste 8.3 8.1 8.1 7.9 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.6 8.4
Total Emissions 431.6 428.2 426.9 414.2 410.4 410.7 404.4 368.7 381.3

a Includes equipment used in construction, mining, oil drilling, industrial and airport ground operations. b Reflects emissions from combustion of natural gas, diesel, and lease fuel plus fugitive emissions. c These categories are listed in the Industrial sector of CARB’s GHG Emission Inventory sectors. d This category is listed in the Electric Power sector of CARB’s GHG Emission Inventory sectors. e The exceptional Aliso Canyon natural gas leak event released 1.96 MMTCO2e of unanticipated emissions in calendar year 2015 and an additional 0.53 MMTCO2e in 2016. These emissions will be mitigated in the future according to legal settlement and are presented alongside but tracked separately from routine inventory emissions.

Note: MMTCO2e – million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions Source: CARB. “GHG Current California Emission Inventory Data.” Accessed March 2024. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/ghg-inventory-data.

Existing Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Table 5: Existing GHG Emissions identifies the existing emissions from the existing restaurant and surface parking lot on the Project Site. As shown, average existing operational annual emissions are 3,745 MTCO2e per year.

7 California Energy Commission (CEC). Inventory of California Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990 to 2004, Staff Final Report. December 2006. Accessed March 2024. https://cetesb.sp.gov.br/inventario-gee-sp/wp- content/uploads/sites/34/2014/04/161.pdf.
812 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 13 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024
TABLE 5

EXISTING OPERATIONAL GHG EMISSIONS
Source Unmitigated
MTCO2e per year
Mobile 3,392
Area <1
Energy 167
Water 50
Waste 134
Refrigerant 2
Total 3,745

Abbreviation: MTCO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions.

Refer to Appendix A.1: CalEEMod Air Quality Emission Output Files – Existing.

Sensitive Receptors
SCAQMD considers a sensitive receptor to be a person in the population who is particularly susceptible to health effects due to exposure to an air contaminant. Sensitive receptors are identified near sources of air pollution to determine the potential for health hazards. Locations evaluated for exposure to air pollution include, but are not limited to, residences, schools, hospitals, and convalescent facilities. The Project Site is bordered by commercial uses to the north , northeast, and east, hotels to the northwest and south, and a parking garage to the west. As shown in Figure 2: Sensitive Receptor Map, the nearest sensitive receptors include the hotel uses located adjacent to the Project Site to the south of the Project Site along N. Central Avenue, the hotel uses located northwest along Arden Avenue, and the residential uses located to the southwest along Burchett Street.

813 of 918

Sensitive Receptors
FIGURE 2
SOURCE: Google Earth – 2024
405-001-23

APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET
150750 300
N
Legend
Project Site
Hotel Uses
Residential Uses
814 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 15 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024

METHODOLOGY
Air Quality
Construction
Emissions are estimated using the latest CalEEMod software, which is a Statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantity potential criteria pollutant and GHG emissions from a variety of land use projects. Detailed construction equipment lists, construction scheduling, and emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A.

Construction of the Project has the potential to generate temporary criteria pollutant emissions through the use of heavy-duty construction equipment and through vehicle trips generated from workers and haul trucks traveling to and from the Project Site. Mobile-source emissions, primarily NOx, would result from the use of construction equipment. Construction emissions can vary substantially from day to day, depending on the level of activity, the specific type of construction activity, and prevailing weather conditions. The assessment of construction air quality impacts considers each of these potential sources.

Daily regional emissions during construction are forecasted by assuming a conservative estimate of construction activities (i.e., all construction occurs at the earliest feasible date) and applying the mobile source and fugitive dust emissions factors. The input values used in this analysis were adjusted to be Project-specific for the equipment and construction schedule. The CalEEMod program uses the CARB on- road vehicle emissions model (EMFAC2021) to calculate the emission rates specific for Los Angeles County for construction-related employee vehicle trips and the CARB off -road emissions model (OFFROAD2011) to calculate emission rates for heavy truck operations. Emission rates are reported by the program in grams per trip and grams per mile or grams per running hour. Daily truck trips and CalEEMod default trip length data were used to assess roadway emissions from truck exhaust. The maximum daily emissions are estimated values for the worst -case day and do not represent the emissions that would occur for every day of Project construction. The maximum daily emissions are compared to the SCAQMD regional thresholds.

Fugitive dust emissions vary greatly during construction and are dependent on the amount and type of activity, silt content of the soil, and the weather. Vehicles moving over paved and unpaved surfaces, demolition, excavation, earth movement, grading, and wind erosion from exposed surfaces can all be sources of fugitive dust. The Project would be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 403, which identifies measures to reduce fugitive dust and is required to be implemented at all construction sites located with SCAB. Therefore, the following condition —required to reduce fugitive dust in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403—was included in CalEEMod as a regulatory compliance measure:
• Control Efficiency of PM10 .

During construction, methods and techniques should be applied to various operations or equipment when appropriate to reduce estimated emissions related to 815 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 16 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024
particulate matter. This includes replacing ground cover in disturbed areas as quick as possible, yielding to emission reduction efficiency of 15−49 percent.8 In addition, SCAQMD s taff recommends that the Lead Agency require the use of Tier 4 construction equipment of 50 horsepower or greater during construction. Alternative, applicable strategies include equipment outfitted with Best Available Control Technology (BACT) devices and CARB-certified Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF). Level 3 DPFs are capable of achieving at least an 85 percent reduction in particulate matter emissions. 9 Therefore, the following condition would be considered a regulatory compliance measure:
• Construction Equipment Controls. D uring construction, all off-road construction equipment greater than 50 horsepower shall meet U SEPA Tier 3 emission standards with Level 3 DPF to minimize emissions of NOx associated with diesel construction equipment.

Toxic Air Contaminant
The greatest potential for toxic air contaminant emissions would be related to diesel particulate emissions associated with heavy equipment operations during construction of the proposed Project .

According to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA),10 health effects from TACs are described in terms of individual cancer risk based on a lifetime (i.e., 30 -year) resident exposure duration. Given the temporary and short -term construction schedule (approximately 36 months), the Project would not result in a long -term (i.e., lifetime or 30 -year) exposure as a result of P roject construction. Furthermore, construction-based PM emissions (including diesel exhaust emissions) do not exceed any regional thresholds.

The Project would comply with the CARB Air Toxics Control Measure that limits diesel powered equipment and vehicle idling to no more than five minutes at a location, and the CARB In-Use Off-Road Diesel Vehicle Regulation; compliance with these would minimize emissions of TACs during construction. The P roject would also comply with the requirements of SCAQMD Rule 1403 if asbestos is found during the renovation and construction activities. Therefore, impacts from TACs during construction would be less than significant and not further assessed in this report.

8 SCAQMD. Sample Construction Scenarios for Projects Less than Five Acres in Size. February 2005. Accessed March 2024. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/localized-significance-thresholds/final-sample-construction- scenario-report.pdf.
9 California Air Resources Board (CARB). “Verification Procedure: Stationary.” Accessed March 2024. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/verification-procedure-warranty-and-use-compliance-requirements-use- strategies-4.
10 Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Air Toxic Hot Spots Program: Risk Assessment Guidelines, Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessment. February 2015. Accessed March 2024. https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. 816 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 17 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024
Odors
Potential sources that may emit odors during construction activities include the application of materials such as asphalt pavement. The objectionable odors that may be produced during the construction process are short-term in nature and the odor emissions are expected to cease upon the drying or hardening of the odor- producing materials. Due to the short -term nature and limited amounts of odor- producing materials being utilized, no significant impact related to odors would occur during construction of the proposed Project. Diesel exhaust and VOCs would be emitted during construction of the Project, which are objectionable to some; however, emissions would disperse rapidly from the Project Site and therefore should not reach an objectionable level at the nearest sensitive receptors. Therefore, impacts from construction-related odor is not further assessed in this report.

Operation
The operations-related criteria air quality impacts created by the proposed Project have been analyzed through the use of the CalEEMod model. The operating emissions were based on the year 2026, which is the first year following construction when the Project is fully operational. The operations emissions printouts from the CalEEMod model are provided in Appendix A. The CalEEMod analyzes operational emissions from area sources, energy usage, and mobile sources, which are discussed below.

Mobile
Operation of the Project has the potential to generate criteria pollutant emissions through vehicle trips traveling to and from the Project S ite. The daily trip rate of 477 forecasted in the Transportation Assessment
11 were based trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition. In calculating mobile-source emissions, trip-length values were based on the distances provided in CalEEMod.

Area
In addition, emissions would result from area sources on site, such as natural gas combustion, landscaping equipment, and use of consumer products. Area-source emissions are based on natural gas (building heating and water heaters), landscaping equipment, and consumer product (including paint) usage rates provided in CalEEMod. As specifics were not known about the landscaping equipment fleet, CalEEMod defaults were used to estimate emissions from landscaping equipment. Natural gas usage factors in CalEEMod are based on the California Energy Commission’s (CEC) California Commercial End Use Survey data set, which provides energy demand by building type and climate zone. No other changes were made to the default area source parameters.

11 Jano Baghdanian & Associates. Transportation Assessment, 820 N. Central Avenue 105-Unit apartment Complex, Glendale, CA. February 6, 2024.
817 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 18 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024
Energy
Energy usage includes emissions from the generation of electricity and natural gas used on site. No changes were made to the default energy usage parameters.

Greenhouse Gas
The analysis of the Project’s GHG emissions consists of a quantitative analysis of the GHG emissions generated by the construction and operation activities and a qualitative analysis of the proposed Project’s consistency with adopted GHG -related legislatio n, plans, and policies. This approach is in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(a), which affirms the discretion of a lead agency to determine, in the context of a particular project, whether to use quantitative and/or qualitative methodologies to determine the significance of a project’s impacts.

Emissions Inventory Modeling
The total GHG emissions from the Project were quantified to determine the level of the Project’s estimated annual GHG emissions. As with the Air Quality calculations, construction emissions were estimated using CalEEMod by assuming a conservative estimate of construction activities (i.e., assuming all construction occurs at the earliest feasible date) and applying the mobile- source emissions factors.

The modeling used the same input values as previously discussed under the methodology section for air quality. SCAQMD’s Draft Guidance Document —Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold
12 recognizes that construction- related GHG emissions from projects occur over a relatively short-term period of time and contributes a relatively small portion of a project’s overall lifetime GHG emissions. The guidance recommends that a project’s construction-related GHG emissions be amortized over a 30-year project lifetime so that GHG reduction measures will address construction GHG emissions as part of the operation GHG reduction strategies. Detailed construction equipment lists, construction scheduling, and emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A.

CalEEMod was also used to estimate operational GHG emissions from electricity, natural gas, solid waste, water and wastewater, and landscaping equipment. CalEEMod calculates energy use from systems covered by Title 24 (e.g., heating, ventilation, and air conditioning [HVAC] system, water heating system, and lighting system); energy use from lighting; and energy use from office equipment, appliances, plug - ins, and other sources not covered by Title 24 or lighting. Mobile-source emissions were estimated based on the CARB EMFAC model. For mobile sources, CalEEMod was used to generate the vehicle miles traveled from Project operation.

With regard to energy demand, the consumption of fossil fuels to generate electricity and to provide heating and hot water generates GHG emissions. Energy demand rates were estimated based on square

12 SCAQMD. Draft Guidance Document—Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold. October 2008. Accessed March 2024. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance- thresholds/ghgattachmente.pdf.
818 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 19 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024
footage as well as predicted water supply needs for this use. Energy demand (off -site electricity generation and on- site natural gas consumption) for the Project was calculated within CalEEMod using the CEC’s C alifornia Commercial En d-Use Survey ( CEUS) data set, which provides energy demand by building type and climate zone.

Emissions of GHGs from solid waste disposal were also calculated using CalEEMod software. The emissions are based on the waste disposal rate for the land uses, the waste diversion rate, and the GHG emission factors for solid waste decomposition. The GHG emission factors, particularly for methane, depend on characteristics of the landfill, such as the presence of a landfill gas capture system and subsequent flaring or energy recovery . The default values, as provided in CalEEMod, for landfill gas capture (e.g ., no capture, flaring, energy recovery), which are Statewide averages, were used in this assessment.

Emissions of GHGs from water and wastewater result from the required energy to supply and distribute the water and treat the wastewater. Wastewater also results in emissions of GHGs from wastewater treatment systems. Emissions are calculated using CalEEMod and are based on the water usage rate for the proposed use; the electrical intensity factors for water supply, treatment, and distribution and for wastewater treatment; the GHG emission factors for the electricity utility provider; and the emission factors for the wastewater treatment process.

819 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 20 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024

SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS
Air Quality
Significance Criteria
The determination of a project’s significance on air quality shall be made considering the factors provided in the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook (Handbook). The City has not adopted specific Citywide significance thresholds for air quality impacts; rather, the thresholds and methodologies contained in the SCAQMD Handbook for both construction and operational emissions are utilized for evaluating projects in the City.

These thresholds are described below.

Construction Emission Thresholds
The Project will have a significant impact if it exceeds the construction thresholds listed in Table 6: Construction Thresholds.

TABLE 6

CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLDS
Pollutant Construction Emissions (pounds/day)
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) 75
Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) 100
Carbon monoxide (CO) 550
Sulfur dioxide (SO2) 150
Respirable particulate matter (PM10) 150
Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) 55
Construction and Operational Local ized Significance Thresholds The local significance thresholds are based on the SCAQMD’s Final Localized Significance Threshold (LST) Methodology (LST Methodology) 13 guidance document for short -duration construction activities. The SCAQMD recommends the evaluation of localized air quality impacts to sensitive receptors in the immediate vicinity of the Project Site because of construction activities. The SCAQMD provides voluntary guidance on the evaluation of localized air quality impacts to public agencies conducting environmental review of projects located within its jurisdiction. Localized air quality impacts are evaluated by examining the on -site generation of pollutants and their resulting downwind concentrations. For construction, pollutant concentrations are compared to significance thresholds for particulates ( PM10 and PM2.5), CO, and NO2. The significance threshold for PM10 represents compliance with SCAQMD Rule

13 SCAQMD. Final Localized Significance Threshold (LST) Methodology. July 2008. Accessed March 2024. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/localized-significance-thresholds/final-lst-methodology- document.pdf?sfvrsn=2.
820 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 21 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024
403−Fugitive Dust. The threshold for PM2.5 is designed to limit emissions and to allow progress toward attainment of the AAQS. Thresholds for CO and NO2 represent the allowable increase in concentrations above background levels that would not cause or contribute to an exceedance of their respective AAQS .

The localized significance thre sholds (LST) Methodology provides lookup tables of emissions that are based on construction projects of up to five acres in size. These LST lookup tables were developed to assist lead agencies with a simple tool for evaluating the impacts from small typical projects. Ambient conditions for the Northwest Los Angeles County Coastal monitoring area, as recorded in SRA 7 by the SCAQMD, were used for ambient conditions in determining appropriate threshold levels. Thresholds for each criteria pollutant for construction activity and Project operation are listed in Table 7: Localized Significance Thresholds.

TABLE 7

LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS
Pollutant
Construction Operational
pounds/day
Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) 80 80
Carbon monoxide (CO) 498 498
Respirable particulate matter (PM10) 4 1
Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) 3 1

Notes: Based on a distance to sensitive receptors of 25 meters. SCAQMD’s Localized Significance Threshold (LST) Methodology for CEQA Evaluations guidance document provides that projects with boundaries located closer than 25 meters to the nearest receptor should use the LSTs for receptors located at 25 meters.

Based on Project size of 1 acre.

Based on the SCAQMD Handbook, thresholds for each criteria pollutant for the operations of the Project are provided in Table 8: Operational Thresholds.

TABLE 8

OPERATIONAL THRESHOLDS
Pollutant Operational Emissions (pounds/day)
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) 55
Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) 55
Carbon monoxide (CO) 550
Sulfur dioxide (SO2) 150
Respirable particulate matter (PM10) 150
Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) 55
821 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 22 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024
Toxic Air Contaminants
As set forth in the SCAQMD Handbook , the determination of significance of a project with respect TACs shall be made on a case-by-case basis, considering the following factors:
• Regulatory framework for toxic materials and process involved; • Proximity of TACs to sensitive receptors;
• Quantity, volume, and toxicity of the contaminants expected to be emitted; • Likelihood and potential level of exposure; and
• Degree to which project design will reduce risk of exposure.

Consistency with Applicable Air Quality Plans
Section 15125 of the State CEQA Guidelines requires an analysis of project consistency with applicable governmental plans and policies. In accordance with the SCAQMD Handbook, the following criteria were used to evaluate the Project’s consistency with SCAQMD and SCAG regional plans and policies:
• Will the Project result in any of the following:
− Increase the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations? − Cause or contribute to new air quality violations?
− Delay the timely attainment of the air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP?
• Will the Project exceed the assumptions utilized in preparing the AQMP? − Is the Project consistent with the population and employment growth projections upon which AQMP forecasted emission levels are based?
− Does the Project include air quality mitigation measures? − To what extent is Project development consistent with the AQMP land use policies? Cumulative Threshold
SCAQMD recommends that a project be considered to result in a cumulatively considerable impact to air quality if any construction -related emissions and operational emissions from individual development projects exceed the mass daily emissions thresholds for individual projects .14 The SCAQMD neither recommends quantified analyses of the emissions generated by a set of cumulative development projects nor provides thresholds of significance to be used to assess the impacts associated with these emissions.

A project is also considered to result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to significant impacts

14 SCAQMD. "White Paper on Regulatory Options for Addressing Cumulative Impacts from Air Pollution Emissions." Board Meeting, Agenda No. 29. September 5, 2003. Accessed March 2024. http://www3.aqmd.gov/hb/2003/September/030929a.html. 822 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 23 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024
if the population and employment projections for the project exceed the rate of growth defined in SCAQMD’s AQMP.

Greenhouse Gas
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4, the methods suitable for analysis of GHG emissions are:

1. Use a model or methodology to quantify greenhouse gas emissions resulting from a project. The Lead Agency has discretion to select the model it considers most appropriate provided it supports its decision with substantial evidence. The Lead Agency should explain the limitation of the particular model or methodology selected for use.

2. Rely on a qualitative analysis or performance-based standards.

The City has not adopted a numerical significance threshold for assessing impacts related to GHG emissions. Nor have SCAQMD, OPR, CARB, CAPCOA, or any other state or regional agency adopted a numerical significance threshold for assessing GHG emissions that is applicable to the Project. Assessing the significance of a project’s contribution to cumulative global climate change involves: (1) developing pertinent inventories of GHG emissions, and (2) considering project consistency with applicable emission reduction strategies and goals. This evaluation of consistency with such plans is the sole basis for determining the significance of the Project’s GHG-related impacts on the environment.

823 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 24 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024

IMPACT ANALYSIS
Emissions of air pollutants were estimated for construction and operation of the Project. In California, the California Air Pollution Control Officer’s Association recommends the use CalEEMod to calculate and organize emissions data for new development projects. CalEEMod is a program that relies on project - specific information pertaining to geographic setting, utility service provision, construction scheduling and equipment inventory, and operational design features to generate estimates of air pollutant and GHG emissions.

Table 9: Project Construction Schedule provides the dates and durations of each of the activities that will take place during construction, as well as a brief description of the scope of work. Future dates represent approximations based on the general Project timeline and are subject to change pending unpredictable circumstances that may arise. It is important to note, Project delays that affect the corresponding time period in which construction activities would occur compared to the analysis time period would result in lower emissions due to newer equipment, regulatory requirements, and greater engine efficiencies. Therefore, the reported construction emissions are overstated compared to the emissions associated with a delayed construction schedule.

TABLE 9

PROJECT CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
Construction
Activity
Approximate
Start Date
Approximate
End Date
Duration
(Days) Description
Demolition 1/1/2026 1/15/20 26 10 Demolition of existing restaurant and surface parking lot (36,000 square feet)
Grading 1/16/2026 6/1 6/2026 108 Grading of Project Site Building
Construction 6/17/20 26 1/17/2028 414 Construction of Proposed Project Paving 1/18/2028 6/1 8/2028 109 Paving of asphalt surfaces Architectural
Coating 6/19/20 28 1/19/2029 155 Application of architectural coatings to building materials

Note: Refer to Appendix A.2: CalEEMod Air Quality Emission Output Files (Proposed).

Air Quality
Construction
An assessment of air pollutant e missions was prepared utilizing the construction schedule in Table 9.

Table 10: Project Construction Diesel Equipment Inventory displays the construction equipment required for each activity described in Table 9. Under regulatory compliance measures in CalEEMod, i t was assumed that all construction activities would adhere to SCAQMD Rule 403−Fugitive Dust and Rule 1113−Architectural Coatings. Additionally, regulatory compliance measures not modeled would require all heavy-duty diesel equipment engines to meet minimum Tier 3 standards in accordance with CARB fleet requirements.
824 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 25 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024
TABLE 10

PROJECT CONSTRUCTION DIESEL EQUIPMENT INVENTORY
Phase Off-Road Equipment Type Amount
Daily
Hours
Horsepower [HP]
(Load Factor)
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8 33 (0.73)
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1 367 (0.40)
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6 84 (0.37)
Grading
Graders 1 6 148 (0.41)
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6 367 (0.40)
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7 84 (0.37)
Building Construction
Cranes 1 4 367 (0.29)
Forklifts 2 6 82 (0.20)
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 84 (0.37)
Paving
Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6 10 (0.56)
Pavers 1 7 81 (0.42)
Rollers 1 7 36 (0.38)
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7 84 (0.37)
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6 37 (0.48)

Refer to Appendix A.2: CalEEMod Air Quality Emission Output Files (Proposed).

Maximum daily emissions of air pollutants during construction of the Project were calculated using CalEEMod. Construction activities involving grading and excavation would primarily generate PM2.5 and PM10 emissions. Approximately 36,000 sf of material would be demolish ed and hauled from the site.

Additionally, approximately 30,000 cubic yards of soil would be exported during the grading phase. Mobile sources (such as diesel- fueled equipment on site and vehicles traveling to and from the Project Site) would primarily generate NOx emissions. The application of architectural coatings would primarily result in the release of VOC emissions. Table 11: Maximum Construction Emissions identifies daily emissions that are estimated for peak construction days for each construction year. It is important to note, emissions presented in Table 11 do not include regulatory compliance measures such as construction equipment controls (Tier 3 emissions standards with Level 3 DPF per CARB requirements). 15 Based on
the modeling, construction of the Project would not exceed regional concentration thresholds.

Construction of the Project would not generate any significant environmental impacts associated with air quality compliance.

15 C ARB. Guide to Off-Road Vehicle & Equipment Regulations. Accessed March 2024. https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/msprog/offroadzone/pdfs/offroad_booklet.pdf. 825 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 26 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024
TABLE 11

Notes: Totals in table may not appear to add exactly due to rounding in the computer model calculations.

Refer to Appendix A.2: CalEEMod Air Quality Emission Output Files (Proposed).

Operation
Operational emissions would result primarily from passenger vehicles traveling to and from the Project Site. According to the traffic memorandum, the proposed Project would generate approximately 477 daily trips ( 39 total new AM peak -hour trips, and 41 total new PM -peak hour trips). 16 The results presented in Table 12: Maximum Operational Emissions are compared to the SCAQMD -established operational significance thresholds. As shown in Table 12 , the operational emissions would not exceed the regional concentration thresholds. Additionally, the operational emissions provided below would be further reduced when taking into account trip reductions from these public transit options located within the Project vicinity. Therefore, operation of the Project would not generate any significant environmental impacts associated with air quality compliance.

TABLE 12

Notes: Totals in table may not appear to add exactly due to rounding in the computer model calculations.

Refer to Appendix A.2: CalEEMod Air Quality Emission Output Files (Proposed).

16 Jano Baghdanian & Associates. 820 N. central Avenue 105-Unit Apartment Complex, Glendale, CA Technical Memorandum.

February 6, 2024.
826 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 27 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024
Localized Significance Thresholds
The result s of the LST analysis are provided in Table 1 3: Localized Construction and Operational Emissions. These estimates assume the maximum area that would be disturbed during construction on any given day during Project buildout. It is important to note that emissions presented in Table 1 2 include regulatory compliance measures such as control efficiency of PM10 (dust control measures). As shown in Table 13, emissions would not exceed the localized significance construction and operational thresholds.

TABLE 13

Notes: Totals in table may not appear to add exactly due to rounding in the computer model calculations.

Refer to Appendix A.2: CalEEMod Air Quality Emission Output Files (Proposed).

Toxic Air Contaminants
Project construction would result in short -term emissions of diesel particulate matter, which is a TAC.

Off-road heavy -duty diesel equipment would emit diesel particulate matter over the course of the construction period. As mentioned previously, single - and multi -family residential uses are located adjacent to the site. Localized diesel particulate emissions (strongly correlated with PM2.5 emissions) would be minimal and would be substantially below localized thresholds, as shown in Table 12. Project compliance with the CARB anti-idling measure, which limits idling to no more than 5 minutes at any location for diesel -fueled commercial vehicles, would further minimize diesel particulate matter emissions in the Project area.

Project operations would generate only minor amounts of diesel emissions from delivery trucks and incidental maintenance activities. Trucks would comply with the applicable provisions of the CARB Truck and Bus regulation to minimize and reduce emission from existing diesel trucks. In addition, Project operations would only result in minimal emissions of air toxics from maintenance or other ongoing activities, such as from the use of architectural coatings or household cleaning products. As a result, toxic or carcinogenic air pollutants are not expected to occur in any meaningful amounts in conjunction with operation of the proposed uses within the Project Site. Based on the uses expected on the Project 827 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 28 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024
Site, potential long-term operational impacts associated with the release of TACs would be minimal and would not be expected to exceed the SCAQMD thresholds of significance.

Odors
As shown in Table 13, the construction of the Project would result in emissions below the localized significance thresholds. Mandatory compliance with SCAQMD Rule 1113 would limit the number of VOCs in architectural coatings and solvents. According to SCAQMD, while almost any source may emit objectionable odors, some land uses are more likely to produce odors because of their operation. Land uses more likely to produce odors include agriculture, chemical plants, composting operations, dairies, fiberglass molding manufacturing, landfills, refineries, rendering plants, rail yards, and wastewater treatment plants. The Project does not contain any active manufacturing activities and would not convert current agricultural land to residential land uses. Therefore, objectionable odors would not be emitted by the proposed uses.

Any unforeseen odors generated by the Project will be controlled in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 402.

As previously noted, Rule 402 prohibits the discharge of air contaminants that harm, endanger, or annoy individuals or the public; endanger the comfort, health or safety of individuals or the public; or cause injury or damage to business or property. Failure to comply with Rule 402 could subject the offending facility to possible fines and/or operational limitations in an approved odor control or odor abatement plan.

Consistency with AQMP
The Basin is designated nonattainment at the federal level for O3 and PM2.5 and State level for O3, PM10, and PM2.5. SCAQMD developed regional emissions thresholds, as shown in Table 6 and Table 8 to determine whether a project would contribute to air pollutant violations. If a project exceeds the regional air pollutant thresholds, then it would significantly contribute to air quality violations in the Basin.

As shown in Table 11, temporary emissions associated with construction of the Project would fall below SCAQMD thresholds for VOCs, NOx, CO, SOx, PM10, and PM2.5. As shown in Table 12, long-term emissions associated with operation of the Project would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for VOC s, NOx, CO, SOx, PM10, and PM2.5. The Project’s maximum potential NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 daily emissions during construction and operation were analyzed to determine potential effects on localized concentrations and to determine if the potential exists for such emissions to cause or affect a violation of an applicable AAQS. As shown in Table 1 3, NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD localized significance thresholds.

The Project is also located in an urban area, which would reduce vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled due to the Project’s urban infill characteristic and proximity to public transit stops. These measures and features are consistent with existing recommendations to reduce air emissions. 828 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 29 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024
Greenhouse Gas
The forecasting of construction- related GHG emissions requires assumptions regarding the timing of construction as the emission factors for some of the Project’s construction-related GHG emission sources decline over time. As shown in Table 14: Construction GHG Emissions, total construction emissions would be 967 metric tons of CO2e (MTCO2e). One -time, short-term emissions are converted to average annual emissions by amortizing them over the service life of a building. For buildings in general, it is reasonable to look at a 30- year time frame because this is a typical interval before a new building requires its first major renovation. 17 As shown in Table 14, when amortized over an average 30 -year Project lifetime, average annual construction emissions from the Project would be 32 MTCO2e per year.

TABLE 14

CONSTRUCTION GHG EMISSIONS
Construction Phase MTCO2e/Year
2026 455
2027 412
2028 97
2029 3
Total Construction Emissions 967
30-Year Annual Amortized Rate 32

Notes: GHG = greenhouse gas; MTCO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Refer to Appendix A.2: CalEEMod Air Quality Emission Output Files (Proposed).

Operation of the Project has the potential to generate GHG emissions through vehicle trips traveling to and from the Project Site. In addition, emissions would result from area sources on site, such as natural gas combustion, landscaping equipment, and use of consumer products. Emissions from mobile and area sources and indirect emissions from energy and water use, wastewater, as well as waste management would occur every year after full development of the uses allowed by the Project. Operational Project emissions from area sources, energy sources, mobile sources, solid waste, and water and wastewater conveyance are shown in Table 15: Operational GHG Emissions below. As shown in Table 15, annual operational emissions from the Project would be 1,392 MTCO2e per year.

TABLE 15

OPERATIONAL GHG EMISSIONS
Source
Unmitigated
MTCO2e per year
Construction (amortized) 32
Mobile 810

17 International Energy Agency (IEA). Energy Efficiency Requirements in Building Codes, Energy Efficiency Policies for New Buildings, IEA Information Paper. March 2008. Accessed March 2024. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/3783f5e8- b14c-4c18-b04c-aab7c59d6e92/Building_Codes.pdf.
829 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 30 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024
TABLE 15

OPERATIONAL GHG EMISSIONS
Source
Unmitigated
MTCO2e per year
Energy 406
Natural Gas 77
Area 25
Water 18
Waste 24
Total 1,392

Abbreviation: MTCO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions.

Refer to Appendix A.2: CalEEMod Air Quality Emission Output Files (Proposed).

Conflict with Applicable Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plans, Policies, or Regulations
There are no federal, State, or local quantitative adopted thresholds of significance for addressing a project’s GHG emissions. In the absence of any adopted, numeric threshold, this analysis evaluates the significance of a project by considering whether the project conflicts with applicable regulations or requirements adopted to implement a Statewide, regional, or local plan for the red uction of mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions. The following analysis describes the extent the Project complies with th e regulations and policies outlined in the City’s General Plan and Greener Glendale Plan.

Consistency with the City of Glendale General Plan
Table 1 6: Project Consistency with Applicable Glendale General Plan Objectives s ummarizes the Project’s consistency with applicable Glendale General Plan objectives. As discussed herein, the Project would be consistent with the actions and measures contained in these local GHG reduction plans.

TABLE 16

PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH APPLICABLE GLENDALE GENERAL PLAN OBJECTIVES Goal Project Consistency
Air Quality will be healthful for all residents of Glendale.

Reduce Glendale’s contribution to regional emissions in a manner both efficient and equitable to residents and
businesses, since emissions generated within Glendale
affect regional air quality.

Consistent. The Project is an infill development that
would involve construction of a new multi -family
residential Building. The Project Site is located
within walking distance of existing commercial uses.

Additionally, the Project is within 0.5-mile of bus for multiple Beeline bus routes including the Central &
Arden, Br and & Glenoaks, and Central & Glenoaks
stops. The Project would reduce VMT and therefor
would reduce the City’s contribution to regional
emissions.

Comply with the Air Quality Management Plan prepared
by the SCAQMD and SCAG.

Consistent. The Project would not exceed
construction or operational emission thresholds as
set by SCAQMD. Additionally, Table 11 and Table 12
830 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 31 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024
TABLE 16

PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH APPLICABLE GLENDALE GENERAL PLAN OBJECTIVES Goal Project Consistency
demonstrate the Project’s consistency with the
AQMP. As such, the Project would comply with the
Air Quality Management Plan.

The reliance on automobile transportation will be reduced.

Promote the use of public transportation and non -
polluting transportation in standards for new
construction.

Consistent. The Project is an infill development that
would involve construction of a new multi -family
residential building. The Project Site is located
within walking distance of existing commercial uses.

Additionally, the Project is within 0.5 -mile of a bus
stop for multiple Beeline bus routes including the
Central & Arden, Brand & Glenoaks, and Central &
Glenoaks stops.

Therefore, the Project would
promote the use of public transportation.

Consistency with Greener Glendale Plan
As discussed previously, the City adopted the Greener Glendale Plan .18 The Greener Glendale Plan incorporates 12 measures in addition to the mandatory Green Building Standards for new construction projects. These measures went into effect on July 7, 2011. The 12 measures and applicability to the Project are provided in Table 17: Project Consistency with Greener Glendale Plan . These measures would be imposed by a condition of approval (COA) upon approval of the Project. By complying with the 12 measures listed in Table 17, the Project would be consistent with the Greener Glendale Plan .

TABLE 17

PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH GREENER GLENDALE PLAN
Measure Applicability

1. Expand applicability of green building
standards to residential buildings over 3
stories.

No Conflict. The Project would be designed and operated to meet the applicable requirements of CALGreen and the City’s Green Building Standards.

2. Exceed California Energy Code
requirements by 15 percent.

No Conflict. The Project would be designed and operated to meet the applicable requirements of the City’s Green Building Standard.

3. Reduce baseline water usage by 20
percent.

No Conflict. The Project would be designed and operated to comply with the City’s water Conservation Ordinance which limits outside water. The Project would also be required to comply with the Title 24 standards for Water Efficiency and Conservation that are in effect at the time of development.

These standards include actions such as separate water
submeters for subsystems, prescriptive reduced flow rates for water and fixtures, wall -mounted urinals, an
d plumbing
fixtures and fittings.

4. A radian roof barrier shall be installed. No Conflict. The Project would comply with the Title 24 standards for the installation of a radian roof barrier for climate zone 9.

5. Gas fired tankless water heaters shall
have an energy factor of at least 0.80.

No Conflict. The Project would comply with the Title 24 minimum energy factor requirement for gas-fired tankless water heaters.

18 City of Glendale. “Greener Glendale.” Accessed March 2024. 831 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 32 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024
TABLE 17

PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH GREENER GLENDALE PLAN
Measure Applicability

6. Gas-fired storage-tank type water heaters
shall have an energy factor of at 0.61.

No Conflict. The Project would comply with the Title 24 minimum energy factor requirement s for gas- fired storage water heaters.

7. Buildings shall be “solar ready.” No Conflict. The Project would comply with California Energy Code Solar Ready requirements for multifamily uses.

8. At least 20 percent of certain paved areas
in residential projects shall be
permeable.

No Conflict. The Project would be designed and operated to meet the applicable requirements of CALGreen, including water-permeable paving for specific walkable surfaces,
parking areas, and patio surfaces.

9. Residential gas-fired heating equipment
shall be high efficiency units.

No Conflict. The Project would comply with the Title 24 minimum energy factor requirements for high efficiency gas - fired heating equipment.

10. Residential air conditioning equipment
shall be high-efficiency units.

No Conflict. The Project would comply with the Title 24 minimum energy factor requirements for high efficiency air conditioning equipment.

11. Natural light ventilation in residential
habitable room shall be increased.

No Conflict. The Project would comply with the Title 24 minimum requirements for enclosed spaces being ventilated during occupied hours with outdoor air using either natural or mechanical ventilation,

12. New single-family dwellings with floor
area greater than 5,000 square feet shall
be required to meet CALGreen Tier 1.

No Conflict. The Project would be designed and operated to meet the applicable requirements of CALGreen.

Source: City of Glendale. “Greener Glendale.” Accessed March 2024. https://www.glendaleca.gov/government/departments/management-services/office-of-sustainability/greener-glendale.

Cumulative Impacts
Development of the Project in conjunction with the related projects near the Project Site would result in an increase in construction and operational emissions in an already urbanized area of the City.

However, cumulative air quality impacts from construction, based on SCAQMD guidelines, are not analyzed in a manner similar to project-specific air quality impacts. Instead, SCAQMD recommends that a project’s potential contribution to cumulative impacts should be assessed utilizing the same significance criteria as those for project-specific impacts. According to SCAQMD, individual development projects that generate construction or operational emissions that exceed SCAQMD recommended daily regional or localized thresholds for project -specific impacts , would also cause a cumulatively considerable increase in emissions for those pollutants for which the Basin is in nonattainment.

With the implementation of regulatory compliance measures such as Rule 403 −Fugitive Dust and Rule
1113−Architectural Coating, the Project’s construction and operational emissions are not expected to significantly contribute to cumulative emissions for CO, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5. As such, the Project’s contribution to cumulative air quality emissions in combination with the related projects would not be cumulatively considerable.

As discussed previously, the Project would not jeopardize the attainment of air quality standards in the AQMP for the Basin and the Los Angeles County portion of the Basin. As such, the Project would not have a cumulatively considerable contribution to a potential conflict with or obstruction of the implementation of the AQMP regional reduction plans.

832 of 918

820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project 33 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study City of Glendale May 2024

CERTIFICATION
The contents of this Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study represent an accurate depiction of the air quality environment and impacts associated with the proposed 820 N. Central Avenue Residential Project.

The information contained in this study is based on the best available information at the time of preparation. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at (818) 415-7274.

Christ Kirikian Nikki Heredia
Principal | Director of Air Quality & Acoustics Project Environmental Scientist [email protected] [email protected]

833 of 918

APPENDIX A
CalEEMod Emission Output Files
834 of 918

APPENDIX A.1
Existing
835 of 918

820 Central - Existing Custom Report, 3/26/2024
1 / 23
820 Central - Existing Custom Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source
836 of 918

820 Central - Existing Custom Report, 3/26/2024
2 / 23

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated 837 of 918

820 Central - Existing Custom Report, 3/26/2024
3 / 23

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
838 of 918

820 Central - Existing Custom Report, 3/26/2024
4 / 23

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

8. User Changes to Default Data
839 of 918

820 Central - Existing Custom Report, 3/26/2024
5 / 23

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name 820 Central - Existing
Operational Y ear 2024
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.50
Precipitation (days) 20.2
Location 34.158303490906775, -118.25738530016275
County Los Angeles-South Coast
City Glendale
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 3987
EDFZ 18
Electric Utility Glendale Water & Power
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.22

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

36.0 1000sqft 0.83 7,000 0.00 — — —
840 of 918

820 Central - Existing Custom Report, 3/26/2024
6 / 23
Parking Lot 72.0 Space 0.65 0.00 0.00 — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 21.4 19.4 16.5 184 0.42 0.29 36.8 37.1 0.27 9.36 9.63 252 43,683 43,935 27.3 1.70 179 45,301 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 21.1 19.1 18.0 168 0.40 0.29 36.8 37.1 0.27 9.36 9.63 252 41,874 42,126 27.4 1.79 15.3 43,358 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 15.2 14.1 10.3 96.1 0.20 0.15 17.5 17.7 0.14 4.45 4.59 252 21,347 21,599 26.6 1.02 45.8 22,614 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.77 2.58 1.88 17.5 0.04 0.03 3.20 3.22 0.03 0.81 0.84 41.7 3,534 3,576 4.40 0.17 7.59 3,744 Exceeds
(Daily
Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshol
d
— 55.0 55.0 550 150 — — 150 — — 55.0 — — — — — — —
Unmit. — No No No No — — No — — No — — — — — — —
841 of 918

820 Central - Existing Custom Report, 3/26/2024
7 / 23
Exceeds
(Average
Daily)
—
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshol
d
— 55.0 55.0 550 150 — — 150 — — 55.0 — — — — — — —
Unmit. — No No No No — — No — — No — — — — — — —

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 21.3 19.2 16.3 184 0.42 0.27 36.8 37.1 0.26 9.36 9.61 — 42,469 42,469 2.00 1.64 168 43,176 Area 0.05 0.22 < 0.005 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.25 1.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.26 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.18 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 1,004 1,004 0.04 < 0.005 — 1,006 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 20.9 209 230 2.15 0.05 — 299 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 231 0.00 231 23.1 0.00 — 808 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 10.9 10.9
Total 21.4 19.4 16.5 184 0.42 0.29 36.8 37.1 0.27 9.36 9.63 252 43,683 43,935 27.3 1.70 179 45,301 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 21.0 18.9 17.9 167 0.40 0.27 36.8 37.1 0.26 9.36 9.61 — 40,662 40,662 2.09 1.73 4.35 41,234 Area — 0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 0.02 0.01 0.18 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 1,004 1,004 0.04 < 0.005 — 1,006 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 20.9 209 230 2.15 0.05 — 299 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 231 0.00 231 23.1 0.00 — 808 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 10.9 10.9
Total 21.1 19.1 18.0 168 0.40 0.29 36.8 37.1 0.27 9.36 9.63 252 41,874 42,126 27.4 1.79 15.3 43,358 842 of 918

820 Central - Existing Custom Report, 3/26/2024
8 / 23
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 15.1 13.9 10.1 95.8 0.20 0.14 17.5 17.7 0.13 4.45 4.58 — 20,133 20,133 1.30 0.97 34.9 20,489 Area 0.04 0.21 < 0.005 0.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.86 0.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.86 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.18 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 1,004 1,004 0.04 < 0.005 — 1,006 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 20.9 209 230 2.15 0.05 — 299 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 231 0.00 231 23.1 0.00 — 808 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 10.9 10.9
Total 15.2 14.1 10.3 96.1 0.20 0.15 17.5 17.7 0.14 4.45 4.59 252 21,347 21,599 26.6 1.02 45.8 22,614 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 2.76 2.54 1.85 17.5 0.04 0.03 3.20 3.22 0.02 0.81 0.84 — 3,333 3,333 0.21 0.16 5.78 3,392 Area 0.01 0.04 < 0.005 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.14 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.14 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 166 166 0.01 < 0.005 — 167 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 3.47 34.6 38.1 0.36 0.01 — 49.5 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 38.2 0.00 38.2 3.82 0.00 — 134 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.81 1.81
Total 2.77 2.58 1.88 17.5 0.04 0.03 3.20 3.22 0.03 0.81 0.84 41.7 3,534 3,576 4.40 0.17 7.59 3,744

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
843 of 918

820 Central - Existing Custom Report, 3/26/2024
9 / 23
High
Turnov
er
(Sit Down
Restaurant)

21.3 19.2 16.3 184 0.42 0.27 36.8 37.1 0.26 9.36 9.61 — 42,469 42,469 2.00 1.64 168 43,176 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 21.3 19.2 16.3 184 0.42 0.27 36.8 37.1 0.26 9.36 9.61 — 42,469 42,469 2.00 1.64 168 43,176 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
Turnov
er
(Sit Down
Restaurant)

21.0 18.9 17.9 167 0.40 0.27 36.8 37.1 0.26 9.36 9.61 — 40,662 40,662 2.09 1.73 4.35 41,234 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 21.0 18.9 17.9 167 0.40 0.27 36.8 37.1 0.26 9.36 9.61 — 40,662 40,662 2.09 1.73 4.35 41,234 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
Turnov
er
(Sit Down
Restaurant)

2.76 2.54 1.85 17.5 0.04 0.03 3.20 3.22 0.02 0.81 0.84 — 3,333 3,333 0.21 0.16 5.78 3,392 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 2.76 2.54 1.85 17.5 0.04 0.03 3.20 3.22 0.02 0.81 0.84 — 3,333 3,333 0.21 0.16 5.78 3,392

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e 844 of 918

820 Central - Existing Custom Report, 3/26/2024
10 / 23
——————————————————Daily,
Summer
(Max)
High
Turnov
er
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — 714 714 0.02 < 0.005 — 716
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 69.5 69.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 69.6 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 784 784 0.03 < 0.005 — 785 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
Turnov
er
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — 714 714 0.02 < 0.005 — 716
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 69.5 69.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 69.6 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 784 784 0.03 < 0.005 — 785 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
Turnov
er
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — 118 118 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 118
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 11.5 11.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.5 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 130 130 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 130

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e 845 of 918

820 Central - Existing Custom Report, 3/26/2024
11 / 23
——————————————————Daily,
Summer
(Max)
High
Turnov
er
(Sit Down
Restaurant)

0.02 0.01 0.18 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 220 220 0.02 < 0.005 — 221 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.02 0.01 0.18 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 220 220 0.02 < 0.005 — 221 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
Turnov
er
(Sit Down
Restaurant)

0.02 0.01 0.18 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 220 220 0.02 < 0.005 — 221 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.02 0.01 0.18 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 220 220 0.02 < 0.005 — 221 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
Turnov
er
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 36.4 36.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 36.5 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 36.4 36.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 36.5

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 846 of 918

820 Central - Existing Custom Report, 3/26/2024
12 / 23
Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

0.05 0.05 < 0.005 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.25 1.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.26 Total 0.05 0.22 < 0.005 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.25 1.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.26 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — 0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.14 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.14 847 of 918

820 Central - Existing Custom Report, 3/26/2024
13 / 23
Total 0.01 0.04 < 0.005 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.14 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.14

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
Turnov
er
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — 20.9 209 230 2.15 0.05 — 299
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 20.9 209 230 2.15 0.05 — 299 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
Turnov
er
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — 20.9 209 230 2.15 0.05 — 299
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 20.9 209 230 2.15 0.05 — 299 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
Turnov
er
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — 3.47 34.6 38.1 0.36 0.01 — 49.5
848 of 918

820 Central - Existing Custom Report, 3/26/2024
14 / 23
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 3.47 34.6 38.1 0.36 0.01 — 49.5

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
Turnov
er
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — 231 0.00 231 23.1 0.00 — 808
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 231 0.00 231 23.1 0.00 — 808 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
Turnov
er
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — 231 0.00 231 23.1 0.00 — 808
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 231 0.00 231 23.1 0.00 — 808 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
849 of 918

820 Central - Existing Custom Report, 3/26/2024
15 / 23
134—0.003.8238.20.0038.2———————————High
Turnov
er
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 38.2 0.00 38.2 3.82 0.00 — 134

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
Turnov
er
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 10.9 10.9
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 10.9 10.9
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
High
Turnov
er
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 10.9 10.9
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 10.9 10.9
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
850 of 918

820 Central - Existing Custom Report, 3/26/2024
16 / 23

1.811.81————————————————High
Turnov
er
(Sit Down
Restaurant)
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.81 1.81

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e 851 of 918

820 Central - Existing Custom Report, 3/26/2024
17 / 23
——————————————————Daily,
Summer
(Max)
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
852 of 918

820 Central - Existing Custom Report, 3/26/2024
18 / 23

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
853 of 918

820 Central - Existing Custom Report, 3/26/2024
19 / 23

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
854 of 918

820 Central - Existing Custom Report, 3/26/2024
20 / 23
Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Y ear VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Y ear High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
4,038 4,406 5,135 1,550,407 15,716 44,601 51,976 9,133,243 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
0 0.00 10,500 3,500 1,694

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
855 of 918

820 Central - Existing Custom Report, 3/26/2024
21 / 23
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)
254,199 1,025 0.0330 0.0040 686,490
Parking Lot 24,727 1,025 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 10,927,214 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 428 —
Parking Lot 0.00 —
856 of 918

820 Central - Existing Custom Report, 3/26/2024
22 / 23

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.00 0.60 0.00 1.00
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
Other
commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 1.80 4.00 4.00 18.0
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
W
alk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Y ear Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
857 of 918

820 Central - Existing Custom Report, 3/26/2024
23 / 23

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Restaurant on site is approximately 7,000 square feet of building located on 36,000 square foot paved lot.
858 of 918

APPENDIX A.2
Proposed
859 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
1 / 46
820 Central - Proposed Custom Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2026) - Unmitigated

3.3. Grading (2026) - Unmitigated

3.5. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated
860 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
2 / 46

3.9. Building Construction (2028) - Unmitigated

3.11. Paving (2028) - Unmitigated

3.13. Architectural Coating (2028) - Unmitigated

3.15. Architectural Coating (2029) - Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
861 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
3 / 46

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
862 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
4 / 46

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
863 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
5 / 46

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
864 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
6 / 46

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

8. User Changes to Default Data
865 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
7 / 46

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name 820 Central - Proposed
Construction Start Date 1/1/2026
Operational Y ear 2030
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.50
Precipitation (days) 20.2
Location 34.15829944372588, -118.25741800233644
County Los Angeles-South Coast
City Glendale
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 3987
EDFZ 18
Electric Utility Glendale Water & Power
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.22

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
866 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
8 / 46
Apartments Mid Rise 105 Dwelling Unit 0.83 129,440 3,450 — 311 — Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
196 Space 0.00 78,400 0.00 — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.42 5.41 12.1 14.3 0.03 0.45 2.82 3.27 0.42 1.20 1.62 — 4,178 4,178 0.20 0.39 7.00 4,306 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.42 5.41 12.2 13.3 0.03 0.45 3.19 3.36 0.42 1.20 1.62 — 4,173 4,173 0.20 0.46 0.18 4,296 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.86 2.26 6.22 9.35 0.02 0.22 1.54 1.76 0.20 0.52 0.72 — 2,684 2,684 0.12 0.20 1.98 2,747 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.16 0.41 1.14 1.71 < 0.005 0.04 0.28 0.32 0.04 0.09 0.13 — 444 444 0.02 0.03 0.33 455 Exceeds
(Daily
Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshol
d
— 75.0 100 550 150 — — 150 — — 55.0 — — — — — — —
867 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
9 / 46
Unmit. — No No No No — — No — — No — — — — — — —
Exceeds
(Average
Daily)
—
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshol
d
— 75.0 100 550 150 — — 150 — — 55.0 — — — — — — —
Unmit. — No No No No — — No — — No — — — — — — —

2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Y ear TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2026 1.42 1.09 12.1 14.3 0.03 0.45 2.82 3.27 0.42 1.20 1.62 — 4,178 4,178 0.20 0.39 7.00 4,306 2027 1.05 0.88 5.72 13.8 0.02 0.17 1.62 1.80 0.16 0.39 0.55 — 3,483 3,483 0.15 0.16 6.41 3,541 2028 0.63 5.41 4.11 6.29 0.01 0.15 0.28 0.38 0.14 0.07 0.20 — 1,051 1,051 0.04 0.01 0.81 1,057 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2026 1.42 1.09 12.2 13.3 0.03 0.45 3.19 3.36 0.42 1.20 1.62 — 4,173 4,173 0.20 0.46 0.18 4,296 2027 1.05 0.88 5.85 12.8 0.02 0.17 1.62 1.80 0.16 0.39 0.55 — 3,408 3,408 0.10 0.16 0.17 3,460 2028 1.01 5.41 5.51 12.5 0.02 0.15 1.62 1.78 0.14 0.39 0.53 — 3,367 3,367 0.10 0.16 0.15 3,418 2029 0.20 5.40 0.87 2.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.28 0.30 0.01 0.07 0.08 — 398 398 0.01 0.01 0.02 401 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2026 0.86 0.69 6.22 8.79 0.02 0.22 1.54 1.76 0.20 0.52 0.72 — 2,684 2,684 0.12 0.20 1.97 2,747 2027 0.75 0.63 4.18 9.35 0.01 0.12 1.15 1.27 0.11 0.27 0.39 — 2,449 2,449 0.07 0.12 1.98 2,487 2028 0.30 2.26 1.76 3.12 < 0.005 0.06 0.23 0.29 0.05 0.05 0.11 — 580 580 0.02 0.01 0.30 585 2029 0.01 0.20 0.03 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.9 14.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 15.1 868 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
10 / 46
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2026 0.16 0.13 1.14 1.60 < 0.005 0.04 0.28 0.32 0.04 0.09 0.13 — 444 444 0.02 0.03 0.33 455 2027 0.14 0.11 0.76 1.71 < 0.005 0.02 0.21 0.23 0.02 0.05 0.07 — 405 405 0.01 0.02 0.33 412 2028 0.06 0.41 0.32 0.57 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.02 — 96.0 96.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 96.8 2029 < 0.005 0.04 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.47 2.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.50

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 3.10 5.70 3.28 27.8 0.06 0.18 4.86 5.05 0.18 1.23 1.42 49.4 9,415 9,465 5.29 0.20 12.2 9,670 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.93 4.61 3.32 16.6 0.06 0.18 4.86 5.04 0.17 1.23 1.41 49.4 9,177 9,227 5.29 0.21 1.22 9,423 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.55 5.25 2.01 22.9 0.05 0.07 4.80 4.87 0.07 1.22 1.29 49.4 7,503 7,553 5.26 0.21 5.77 7,752 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.47 0.96 0.37 4.19 0.01 0.01 0.88 0.89 0.01 0.22 0.23 8.17 1,242 1,250 0.87 0.03 0.96 1,283 Exceeds
(Daily
Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Threshol
d
— 55.0 55.0 550 150 — — 150 — — 55.0 — — — — — — —
Unmit. — No No No No — — No — — No — — — — — — —
869 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
11 / 46
——————————————————Exceeds
(Average
Daily)
Threshol
d
— 55.0 55.0 550 150 — — 150 — — 55.0 — — — — — — —
Unmit. — No No No No — — No — — No — — — — — — —

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.73 1.52 1.35 17.6 0.05 0.03 4.86 4.89 0.02 1.23 1.26 — 4,982 4,982 0.19 0.17 11.2 5,050 Area 1.32 4.15 1.56 10.0 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.13 — 0.13 0.00 1,909 1,909 0.04 < 0.005 — 1,911 Energy 0.04 0.02 0.37 0.16 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 2,448 2,448 0.10 0.01 — 2,453 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 7.50 75.7 83.2 0.77 0.02 — 108 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 41.9 0.00 41.9 4.18 0.00 — 146 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.93 0.93
Total 3.10 5.70 3.28 27.8 0.06 0.18 4.86 5.05 0.18 1.23 1.42 49.4 9,415 9,465 5.29 0.20 12.2 9,670 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.72 1.51 1.47 15.8 0.05 0.03 4.86 4.89 0.02 1.23 1.26 — 4,774 4,774 0.19 0.18 0.29 4,833 Area 0.17 3.08 1.48 0.63 0.01 0.12 — 0.12 0.12 — 0.12 0.00 1,879 1,879 0.04 < 0.005 — 1,881 Energy 0.04 0.02 0.37 0.16 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 2,448 2,448 0.10 0.01 — 2,453 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 7.50 75.7 83.2 0.77 0.02 — 108 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 41.9 0.00 41.9 4.18 0.00 — 146 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.93 0.93
Total 1.93 4.61 3.32 16.6 0.06 0.18 4.86 5.04 0.17 1.23 1.41 49.4 9,177 9,227 5.29 0.21 1.22 9,423 870 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
12 / 46
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.71 1.50 1.49 16.3 0.05 0.03 4.80 4.82 0.02 1.22 1.24 — 4,830 4,830 0.19 0.18 4.85 4,894 Area 0.80 3.73 0.16 6.47 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 149 149 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 149 Energy 0.04 0.02 0.37 0.16 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 2,448 2,448 0.10 0.01 — 2,453 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 7.50 75.7 83.2 0.77 0.02 — 108 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 41.9 0.00 41.9 4.18 0.00 — 146 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.93 0.93
Total 2.55 5.25 2.01 22.9 0.05 0.07 4.80 4.87 0.07 1.22 1.29 49.4 7,503 7,553 5.26 0.21 5.77 7,752 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.31 0.27 0.27 2.98 0.01 < 0.005 0.88 0.88 < 0.005 0.22 0.23 — 800 800 0.03 0.03 0.80 810 Area 0.15 0.68 0.03 1.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 24.7 24.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 24.7 Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 405 405 0.02 < 0.005 — 406 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 1.24 12.5 13.8 0.13 < 0.005 — 17.9 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 6.93 0.00 6.93 0.69 0.00 — 24.3 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.15 0.15
Total 0.47 0.96 0.37 4.19 0.01 0.01 0.88 0.89 0.01 0.22 0.23 8.17 1,242 1,250 0.87 0.03 0.96 1,283

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
871 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
13 / 46
——————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

0.53 0.44 4.09 5.58 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.12 — 0.12 — 852 852 0.03 0.01 — 855 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 2.29 2.29 — 0.35 0.35 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.11 0.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 23.3 23.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 23.4 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.06 0.06 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.86 3.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.88 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
14 / 46
Hauling 0.20 0.04 3.52 1.35 0.02 0.04 0.77 0.80 0.04 0.21 0.25 — 2,817 2,817 0.16 0.45 0.16 2,955 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.57 3.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.62 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 77.2 77.2 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 81.0 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.59 0.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.60 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 12.8 12.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 13.4

3.3. Grading (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.22 1.02 9.19 9.69 0.02 0.42 — 0.42 0.39 — 0.39 — 1,714 1,714 0.07 0.01 — 1,720 Dust
From
Material
Mov
ement
— — — — — — 2.08 2.08 — 1.00 1.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.22 1.02 9.19 9.69 0.02 0.42 — 0.42 0.39 — 0.39 — 1,714 1,714 0.07 0.01 — 1,720 873 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
15 / 46
Dust
From
Material
Mov
ement
— — — — — — 2.08 2.08 — 1.00 1.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.36 0.30 2.72 2.87 < 0.005 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 507 507 0.02 < 0.005 — 509 Dust
From
Material
Mov
ement
— — — — — — 0.61 0.61 — 0.30 0.30 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.50 0.52 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 84.0 84.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 84.3 Dust
From
Material
Mov
ement
— — — — — — 0.11 0.11 — 0.05 0.05 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 102 102 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.34 103 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.17 0.04 2.84 1.12 0.02 0.03 0.64 0.67 0.03 0.18 0.21 — 2,362 2,362 0.13 0.38 5.30 2,483 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
874 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
16 / 46
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 96.3 96.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 97.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.17 0.04 2.96 1.13 0.02 0.03 0.64 0.67 0.03 0.18 0.21 — 2,363 2,363 0.13 0.38 0.14 2,479 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 29.3 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.05 0.01 0.88 0.33 < 0.005 0.01 0.19 0.20 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 699 699 0.04 0.11 0.67 734 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.79 4.79 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.85 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.16 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 116 116 0.01 0.02 0.11 122

3.5. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.59 0.49 4.81 6.91 0.01 0.19 — 0.19 0.17 — 0.17 — 1,304 1,304 0.05 0.01 — 1,309 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.59 0.49 4.81 6.91 0.01 0.19 — 0.19 0.17 — 0.17 — 1,304 1,304 0.05 0.01 — 1,309 875 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
17 / 46

0.000.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Onsite truck
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.23 0.19 1.86 2.68 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.07 — 0.07 — 505 505 0.02 < 0.005 — 507 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.04 0.03 0.34 0.49 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 83.7 83.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 84.0 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.45 0.40 0.42 7.01 0.00 0.00 1.42 1.42 0.00 0.33 0.33 — 1,470 1,470 0.06 0.05 4.98 1,492 Vendor 0.05 0.02 0.83 0.40 0.01 0.01 0.21 0.22 0.01 0.06 0.06 — 751 751 0.03 0.11 2.03 785 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.45 0.40 0.47 5.98 0.00 0.00 1.42 1.42 0.00 0.33 0.33 — 1,394 1,394 0.06 0.05 0.13 1,411 Vendor 0.05 0.02 0.87 0.41 0.01 0.01 0.21 0.22 0.01 0.06 0.06 — 751 751 0.03 0.11 0.05 784 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.17 0.15 0.20 2.43 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.13 0.13 — 548 548 0.02 0.02 0.83 555 Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.34 0.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 291 291 0.01 0.04 0.34 304 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
876 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
18 / 46
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 90.7 90.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.14 92.0 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 48.2 48.2 < 0.005 0.01 0.06 50.3 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.7. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.57 0.48 4.56 6.90 0.01 0.17 — 0.17 0.15 — 0.15 — 1,304 1,304 0.05 0.01 — 1,309 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.57 0.48 4.56 6.90 0.01 0.17 — 0.17 0.15 — 0.15 — 1,304 1,304 0.05 0.01 — 1,309 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.40 0.34 3.25 4.93 0.01 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 932 932 0.04 0.01 — 935 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.59 0.90 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 154 154 0.01 < 0.005 — 155 877 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
19 / 46

0.000.000.000.000.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Onsite truck
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.44 0.39 0.37 6.52 0.00 0.00 1.42 1.42 0.00 0.33 0.33 — 1,442 1,442 0.06 0.05 4.49 1,464 Vendor 0.05 0.02 0.79 0.38 0.01 0.01 0.21 0.21 0.01 0.06 0.06 — 736 736 0.03 0.10 1.92 769 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.43 0.38 0.47 5.52 0.00 0.00 1.42 1.42 0.00 0.33 0.33 — 1,367 1,367 0.02 0.05 0.12 1,383 Vendor 0.05 0.02 0.82 0.39 0.01 0.01 0.21 0.21 0.01 0.06 0.06 — 736 736 0.03 0.10 0.05 768 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.31 0.27 0.33 4.15 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 — 991 991 0.01 0.04 1.38 1,004 Vendor 0.03 0.02 0.59 0.27 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 0.15 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 — 526 526 0.02 0.07 0.59 549 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 164 164 < 0.005 0.01 0.23 166 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.11 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 87.1 87.1 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 90.8 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Building Construction (2028) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
878 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
20 / 46
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.55 0.46 4.30 6.91 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.14 — 0.14 — 1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 — 1,309 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.14 0.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 43.4 43.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 43.5 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.19 7.19 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.21 Onsite
truck

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
21 / 46
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 45.3 45.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 45.9 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 23.9 23.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 25.0 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.51 7.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.60 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.96 3.96 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.14 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.11. Paving (2028) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.56 0.47 4.05 5.31 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.14 — 0.14 — 823 823 0.03 0.01 — 826 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.56 0.47 4.05 5.31 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.14 — 0.14 — 823 823 0.03 0.01 — 826 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
880 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
22 / 46
Off-Road
Equipment

0.17 0.14 1.21 1.58 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.04 — 0.04 — 246 246 0.01 < 0.005 — 247 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.03 0.22 0.29 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 40.7 40.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 40.8 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 228 228 < 0.005 0.01 0.65 232 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 217 217 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 219 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 65.6 65.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 66.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.9 10.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 11.0 881 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
23 / 46
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.13. Architectural Coating (2028) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.11 0.81 1.12 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.01 — 0.01 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 5.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.11 0.81 1.12 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.01 — 0.01 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 5.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.04 0.31 0.43 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 51.2 51.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 51.4 882 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
24 / 46
————————————————2.00—Architect
ural
Coatings
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.06 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 8.48 8.48 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.51 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.07 1.22 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.07 0.07 — 283 283 < 0.005 0.01 0.81 287 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.08 1.04 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.07 0.07 — 269 269 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 272 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 105 105 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 106 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
883 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
25 / 46
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 17.3 17.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 17.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.15. Architectural Coating (2029) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.12 0.10 0.79 1.11 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 5.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.96 4.96 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.98 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
884 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
26 / 46

0.82—< 0.005< 0.0050.820.82—< 0.005—< 0.005< 0.005—< 0.005< 0.0050.010.01< 0.005< 0.005Off-Road Equipment
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.97 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.07 0.07 — 264 264 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 267 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.96 9.96 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.65 1.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.67 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
885 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
27 / 46

1.73 1.52 1.35 17.6 0.05 0.03 4.86 4.89 0.02 1.23 1.26 — 4,982 4,982 0.19 0.17 11.2 5,050 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elev
ator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 1.73 1.52 1.35 17.6 0.05 0.03 4.86 4.89 0.02 1.23 1.26 — 4,982 4,982 0.19 0.17 11.2 5,050 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise

1.72 1.51 1.47 15.8 0.05 0.03 4.86 4.89 0.02 1.23 1.26 — 4,774 4,774 0.19 0.18 0.29 4,833 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elev
ator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 1.72 1.51 1.47 15.8 0.05 0.03 4.86 4.89 0.02 1.23 1.26 — 4,774 4,774 0.19 0.18 0.29 4,833 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise

0.31 0.27 0.27 2.98 0.01 < 0.005 0.88 0.88 < 0.005

0.22 0.23 — 800 800 0.03 0.03 0.80 810
Enclosed
Parking
with
Elev
ator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 886 of 918

820 Central - Proposed Custom Report, 3/26/2024
28 / 46
Total 0.31 0.27 0.27 2.98 0.01 < 0.005 0.88 0.88 < 0.005 0.22 0.23 — 800 800 0.03 0.03 0.80 810

Glendale City CouncilNovember 4, 2025

Glendale City Council
November 4, 2025