Agenda packet, joint meeting — Glendale City Council, June 9, 2026

A G E N D A
JOINT MEETING: GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL AND GLENDALE HOUSING AUTHORITY

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor
Glendale, CA 91206
JUNE 9, 2026 - 3:00 PM

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND ACCESSIBILITY

PLEASE SILENCE CELLULAR PHONES WHILE INSIDE THE MEETING LOCATION Viewing of Meetings
:
•
In-person – City Council Chambers, 613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor, Glendale, CA 91206 •
Live Broadcast via Glendale TV, viewable on Spectrum Cable, channel 6, and AT&T U-verse, channel 99. Meetings are also streamed on the City webpage, glendaleca.gov/live
, on
YouTube.com/myglendale
, and on the Cablecast app under "Glendale TV". Meetings are also archived on the City Website for viewing anytime at
glendaleca.gov/agendas
.

Joint Council/Housing meeting agenda packets, any agenda related documents, and additional documents are available at City Hall and online for public viewing on the City’s website:
https://www.glendaleca.gov/government/public-meeting-portal ADA Accessibility and Translation Services
:

compliance

with

the

Americans

with

Disabilities

Act

(ADA)

1990,

auxiliary

hearing

aids,

sign
language

translation,

and

Braille

transcripts

are

available

upon

request.

Assisted

listening

devices
are

available

same-day

upon

request.

The

City

Clerk’s

office

should

notified

72 hours

(three
business

days)

soon

practicable

for

requests

regarding

sign

language

translation

and
Braille

transcription

services;

please

direct

all

accessibility

requests

(818)

548-2090.

For
translations,

please

specify

the

language

for

which

you

require

translation.

The

exclusive

use

of
City

provided

interpreters

not

required

and

persons

are

welcome

use

their

own

interpreter

or
speak in their native language.

Public participation in Council meetings may occur as follows :
•
In-person – City Council Chambers
•
T elephonic participation: Call (818) 937-8100
If you have any questions about matters on the agenda, or requests for assistance including agenda email notification, please contact the City Clerk’s Office via email at [email protected], or by phone at (818) 548-2090.

1 TYPED 6/5/2026 9:51:51 AM
06 09 26
CC HA

PUBLIC COMMENT GUIDELINES
The City Council and Housing Authoirty welcome public input at City Council meetings. Public input during joint meetings is regulated by the City Council’s Rules of Order, Procedure and Decorum for the Conduct of City Council Meetings as set forth in Resolution No. 25-76, which will be summarized below.

Written Comments and Documents
:

Public comments received in writing will NOT be read aloud at the meeting but will be part of the meeting record. Written public comments can be emailed to [email protected], and will be uploaded to the City website as an attachment to the agenda item. When submitting a public comment, please make sure to include the following
:

1. Name (optional); and

2. Agenda item to which you are submitting public comment

3. Submit no later than 12:00 p.m. on the day of the City Council meeting. Correspondence received after this time may not be distributed until the following business day.

All documents related to open session items on this agenda that are received less than 72 hours prior to this meeting, and are public records, will be available for review in the Office of the City Clerk, 613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206.

Public Comments During Council Meeting
:

Public Comments during Community Event Announcements, First and Second Periods of Oral Communications and agenda items will be governed as provided in the descriptions for those items on the agenda below. Pursuant to State law, the City Council may not discuss or take action on any item not appearing on the meeting agenda, except that members of the City Council, Housing Authority or staff may ask a question for clarification or briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons exercising public testimony rights (Government Code Section 54954.2). Staff may be asked to follow up on such items.

Submitting Speaker Cards or Calling In for Public Comment :

Speaker cards must be submitted and telephonic participants must call in and be in the call-in queue, PRIOR to the completion of the verbal staff report on the agenda item (unless waived by the Mayor). Any audio-visual files displayed by speakers must be emailed to the Clerk’s office by 12:00 pm on the day before a Council meeting.

2 TYPED 6/5/2026 9:51:51 AM
06 09 26
CC HA

JUNE 9, 2026 - 3:00 PM

ROLL CALL
-
3:00 PM
-
Report of the City Clerk of the City Council and Housing Authority, re: Posting of Agenda.

The Agenda for the Tuesday, June 9, 2026 joint public meeting of the City Council and Housing Authority was posted on June 4, 2026, on the Bulletin Board outside City Hall.

JOINT PUBLIC MEETING
of the City Council and Housing Authority is hereby called to meet at

3:00 PM
on
Tuesday, June 9, 2026
, in the Council Chamber, 613 E. Broadway, 2nd
Floor, Glendale, CA 91206 to consider the following item(s) of business, to wit;

1. City Clerk, re:

Minutes of the Joint Glendale City Council and Housing Authority Meetings of April 28, 2026 and May 5, 2026

2. Community Services and Parks, re: FY 2026-27 Annual Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and HOME Investment Partnerships Act (HOME) programs
a. City Council Resolution Adopting an Environmental Negative Declaration b. City Council Motion to approve FY 2026-27 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,210,581; authorize the submission of the Annual Action Plan to U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee and Continuum of Care (CoC) Board; and authorize the City Manager or a designee, to redirect excess, cancelled or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval c. Housing Authority Motion to approve FY 2026-27 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,210,581 and authorize the submission of the Annual Action Plan to HUD, as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee and CoC Board

3. Community Services and Parks, re:

Reprogramming of 2020-2021 Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) Undesignated Fund Balance of $57,967 to City’s Capital Improvement Project for Elk Mini Park Playground Replacement Project a. City Council Motion to (1) reprogram $57,967 in CDBG undesignated fund balance from Program Year 2020–2021 to the Elk Mini Park Playground Replacement Project; (2) authorize the City Manager, or a designee, to execute all agreements, amendments, certifications, and documents necessary to program the funds; (3) authorize submission to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) of a substantial amendment to CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plans for program years 2020-2021 and 2025-2026; and (4) authorize the City Manager, or a designee, to redirect excess, cancelled, or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval
b. Housing Authority Motion to approve a substantial amendment to CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plans for program years 2020-2021 and 2025-2026; authorize submission of the substantial amendments to the Annual Action Plans to HUD; and authorize the City Manager, or a designee, to redirect excess, cancelled, or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval
c. Resolution of Appropriation to reprogram CDBG undesignated fund balance in the amount of $57,967 from program year 2020-2021 to Elk Mini Park Playground

3 TYPED 6/5/2026 9:51:51 AM
06 09 26
CC HA

Replacement Project

ADJOURNMENT

4 TYPED 6/5/2026 9:51:51 AM
06 09 26
CC HA

1 04 28 26 CCHA

M I N U T E S
JOINT MEETING: GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

AND GLENDALE HOUSING AUTHORITY

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor
Glendale, CA 91206
APRIL 28, 2026
The Joint City Council and Housing Authority Meeting of the Glendale City Council convened in the City Chambers, in said City, at 3:06 PM, on the above date, pursuant to a call for such meeting signed by the City Clerk of the City Council, and on file with the City Clerk, a copy of which is as follows:

April 24, 2026
Date
Written Notice of said meeting was given, which Notice consisted of a copy of the foregoing Call, and was served on each Member of the Council not joining in the Call, and upon the in said City not less than 24 hours before the time fixed in said Call for said meeting, as follows:

Upon Elen Asatryan at 5:00 PM April 24, 2026 Glendale, CA Upon Dan Brotman at 5:00 PM April 24, 2026 Glendale, CA Upon Vartan Gharpetian at 5:00 PM April 24, 2026 Glendale, CA Upon Ara Najarian at 5:00 PM April 24, 2026 Glendale, CA Upon Ardy Kassakhian at 5:00 PM April 24, 2026 Glendale, CA Mayor Kassakhian called the meeting to order at 3:06 PM.

ROLL CALL – 3:06 PM
- Absent: Parazian
- Report of the City Clerk of the City Council and Housing Authority, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the Tuesday, April 28, 2026 joint public meeting of the City Council and Housing Authority was posted on April 24, 2026, on the Bulletin Board outside City Hall.

A JOINT PUBLIC MEETING of the City Council and Housing Authority is hereby called to meet at 3:00 PM on Tuesday, April 28, 2026, in the Council Chamber, 613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor, Glendale, CA 91206 to consider the following item(s) of business, to wit;
5 of 126

2 04 28 26 CCHA

1. Community Development, re: Report on Emergency
Housing Choice Voucher Transition Plan
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Mike Fortney, Acting Assistant Director, Community Development Department/Housing
Michael Garcia, City Attorney
Presentation:

Sipan Zadoryan, Housing Supervisor, Community Development Department Public Comments:

Ani Khash
Linda Neumaier
Emik Novshadyan
Liane Parunakyan
Ramy
Fernando Roldan
a. City Council Motion directing staff on the Section 8 waitlist strategy b. City Council Motion approving the Parkview Selection Plan c. City Council Motion approving the tiered prioritization strategy and approving the deployment of available local and regional resources, HOME, Homeless Services funds, as a temporary subsidy to prevent immediate displacement for the most vulnerable households
City Attorney Michael Garcia noted the three motions would be revised into one motion.

Moved: Brotman Seconded: Gharpetian
Vote as Follows:

1. Councilmember Asatryan steeped away at 3:58 PM and returned at 4:02 PM.

Councilmember Najarian stepped away at 4:20 PM and returned at 4:22 PM.

Councilmember Asatryan steeped away at 4:32 PM and returned at 4:37 PM.

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Najarian, Kassakhian
None
None
None
6 of 126

3 04 28 26 CCHA
ADJOURNMENT – 4:56 PM
City Council
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Gharpetian
Housing Authority
Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Najarian
City Clerk of the City of Glendale
Mayor of the City of Glendale
7 of 126

1 05 05 26 CCHA

M I N U T E S
JOINT MEETING: GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

AND GLENDALE HOUSING AUTHORITY

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor
Glendale, CA 91206
MAY 5, 2026
The Joint City Council and Housing Authority Meeting of the Glendale City Council convened in the City Chambers, in said City, at 4:32 PM, on the above date, pursuant to a call for such meeting signed by the City Clerk of the City Council, and on file with the City Clerk, a copy of which is as follows:

May 1, 2026
Date
Written Notice of said meeting was given, which Notice consisted of a copy of the foregoing Call, and was served on each Member of the Council not joining in the Call, and upon the in said City not less than 24 hours before the time fixed in said Call for said meeting, as follows:

Upon Elen Asatryan at 5:00 PM May 1, 2026 Glendale, CA
Upon Dan Brotman at 5:00 PM May 1, 2026 Glendale, CA
Upon Vartan Gharpetian at 5:00 PM May 1, 2026 Glendale, CA Upon Ara Najarian at 5:00 PM May 1, 2026 Glendale, CA
Upon Ardy Kassakhian at 5:00 PM May 1, 2026 Glendale, CA Mayor Kassakhian called the meeting to order at 4:32 PM.

ROLL CALL – 4:32 PM
- Absent: Councilmember Brotman, Housing Authority Chair Adjinian - Report of the City Clerk of the City Council and Housing Authority, re:

Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the Tuesday, May 5, 2026 joint public meeting of the City Council and Housing Authority was posted on May 1, 2026, on the Bulletin Board outside City Hall.

A JOINT PUBLIC MEETING of the City Council and Housing
Authority is hereby called to meet at 4:00 PM on Tuesday, May 5, 2026, in the Council Chamber, 613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor, Glendale, CA 91206 to consider the following item(s) of business, to wit;

1. Community Development, re: Public Hearing and Approval of Fiscal Year 2026-27 Section 8 Public Housing Agency (PHA) Annual Plan, and 2026 Section 8 Administrative Plan
Mayor Kassakhian opened the Public Hearing at 4:33 PM and closed it at 5:12 PM. 8 of 126

2 05 05 26 CCHA
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Pamela Jackson, Housing Coordinator, Community Development Department Presentation:

Edgar Akopyan, Senior Housing Analyst, Community Development Department Public Speakers:

Beth Brooks
a. Housing Authority Resolution [H-543] Adopting and
Authorizing the Submission of the Section 8 Public Housing Agency Fiscal Year 2026-27 Annual Plan, and the 2026
Section 8 Administrative Plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Moved: Najarian Seconded: Gharpetian
Vote as Follows:

1. Councilmember Najarian stepped away at 4:33 PM and returned at 4:34 PM.

ADJOURNMENT – 5:18 PM
City Council
Moved: Gharpetian Seconded: Najarian
Housing Authority
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Najarian
City Clerk of the City of Glendale
Mayor of the City of Glendale
Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

Asatryan, Gharpetian, Kassakhian, Najarian, Parazian
None
Brotman, Adjinian
None
9 of 126

2 26-90095

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
REPORT TO THE JOINT MEETING: GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL AND

GLENDALE HOUSING AUTHORITY

AGENDA ITEM
Report: FY 2026-27 Annual Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and HOME Investment Partnerships Act (HOME) programs.

1. City Council Resolution Adopting an Environmental Negative Declaration.

2. City Council Motion to approve FY 2026-27 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,210,581; authorize the submission of the Annual Action Plan to U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee and Continuum of Care (CoC) Board; and authorize the City Manager or a designee, to redirect excess, cancelled or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval.

3.Housing Authority Motion to approve FY 2026-27 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,210,581 and authorize the submission of the Annual Action Plan to HUD, as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee and CoC Board.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for June 2, 2026 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The CDBG Advisory Committee (Committee) has made funding recommendations for the CDBG program, based on program priorities and an estimated entitlement allocation from HUD. The Committee reviewed proposals from community agencies for Public Social Services (PSS) and Capital Improvement Projects (CIP), conducted interviews with agencies, and recommended funding ten community agencies for PSS and four community agencies for CIP.

The CoC Board approved the FY 2026-27 funding recommendations in the proposed Annual Action Plan for the two-year ESG Program, based on program priorities, for an entitlement allocation of $152,823. Subject to review and approval by the CoC Board, ESG programs that request continued funding for the subsequent year and meet their outcomes and performance goals are allowed renewal for funding. The funding allocation 10 of 126

22 26-90095
6 8
3 7
for FY 2026-27 is $152,823, which is $495 more than the previous year’s allocation.

The Housing Authority uses HOME funding to develop affordable housing projects and programs. It periodically updates a Statement of Interest to reflect funding and priorities for the HOME allocation it receives each year from HUD. It also seeks input from community members. Funding priorities for FY 2026-27 that includes Affordable Rental Development, CHDO Set-Aside, HOME Tenant-Based Rental Assistance – EHV Bridge Program and Administrative Costs.

RECOMMENDATION
That City Council adopt a resolution adopting an Environmental Negative Declaration and pass a motion (1) approving FY 2026-27 Annual Action Plan for CDBG, ESG, HOME programs totaling $3,210,581, (2) authorizing the submission of the Annual Action Plan to HUD, and (3) authorizing the City Manager to redirect excess cancelled or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval. Additionally, that the Housing Authority pass a motion approving FY 2026-27 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan totaling $3,210,581 and authorizing the submission of the Annual Action Plan to HUD, as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee and CoC Board.

ANALYSIS
The City of Glendale (City) has been receiving CDBG funds from HUD since the inception of the program in 1974, marking it the 52nd year of the Glendale CDBG program. The ESG program was added in 1987, and the HOME program was added in 1992.

The national and local objectives of the CDBG program are to:

1. eliminate conditions of slums and blight; and

2. provide programs and services that benefit low and moderate-income persons, including the homeless.

The objectives of the ESG program are to:

1. engage homeless individuals and families living on the street;

2. improve the number and quality of emergency shelters for homeless individuals and families;

3. help operate these shelters;

4. provide essential services to shelter residents;

5. rapidly re-house homeless individuals and families; and

6. prevent families and individuals from becoming homeless.

The objective of the HOME program is to provide and preserve affordable housing for low-income persons.

The City is responsible for following HUD guidelines and developing a 5-year Consolidated Plan (ConPlan) and an Annual Action Plan for the use of the funds.

Consolidated Plan
11 of 126

23 26-90095
6 8
3 7
As a condition of eligibility for CDBG, ESG, and HOME entitlement funds, the City is required to submit to HUD a five-year strategic plan – “Consolidated Plan” – for the use of these funds. The current Five Year 2025-30 ConPlan was approved by the City Council in June 2025 and submitted to, and approved by, HUD. Thus, FY 2026-27 is the second year of a five-year cycle. The ConPlan provides a profile of the City, and establishes program priorities, funding strategies, and proposed goals for addressing community development, housing, and homeless needs in the community. The ConPlan also incorporates other funding sources, programs, and initiatives that assist in addressing the City’s community development, housing, and homeless needs; and strategies for leveraging and coordinating these resources.

The ConPlan is the primary planning document that HUD uses to measure the City’s effectiveness and to approve the submission of Annual Action Plans and other funding applications to HUD. The Annual Action Plans are comprised of specific projects the City plans to implement to meet the objectives of the ConPlan every fiscal year.

Annual Action Plan
In developing the Annual Action Plan, HUD requires that the City involve citizens in the plan development and approval process. This process is a combined effort for CDBG, ESG, and HOME programs and includes community meetings, board meetings and oversight boards. As a result of these efforts, the program priorities included in the FY 2026-27 Annual Action Plan were developed, recommended, and approved in November 2025 by the City Council and Housing Authority.

CDBG
The most prominent program in the ConPlan/Action Plan development process is the CDBG program. Annual planning for the CDBG program includes outreach to Glendale non-profit community agencies to introduce the CDBG program and process; hosting a community meeting to identify community needs and set program priorities, pre- designating funds to City CIP; issuing a Request for Proposal (RFP) to community agencies for PSS programs and CIP; working with the CDBG Advisory Committee to review the proposals, interviewing the agencies that submitted proposals and recommending funding for community agencies; monitoring current fiscal year programs; and reallocating funds as necessary.

CDBG Advisory Committee
To achieve citizen involvement in plan development and approval process, the City Council appoints a CDBG Advisory Committee, the responsibility of which is to help oversee the CDBG planning process.

The Committee’s current responsibilities include:
Reviewing and commenting on the annual community needs assessment strategy. Recommending program priorities, based on findings from the needs assessment, as well as input from the City Council;
Evaluating funding proposals;
Interviewing community agencies and City departments that submit project 12 of 126

24 26-90095
6 8
3 7
proposals;
Recommending projects for funding;
Reviewing sub-recipient performance, such as site visits and outcome reviews; Reviewing and approving revisions or amendments to projects throughout the program year; and
Reviewing and recommending reprogramming of CDBG funds.

The current CDBG Advisory Committee is comprised of the following members:

1. Armik Avedisian

2. Lea Awni

3. Anita Quinonez Gabrielian

4. Ronnie Gharibian (Chair)

5. Marina Manoukian (Vice Chair)

CDBG funds are divided into following three categories:

Administration (Planning, Program Management and Oversight) HUD allows jurisdictions to use 20% of their CDBG entitlement funds for administration of the CDBG program to ensure that they have the capacity to comply with the administratively laden HUD requirements and minimize financial risks. The core functions of Administration are planning, monitoring, contract compliance, financial management and project coordination. Each year, additional federal documentation requirements are being imposed to demonstrate eligibility for CDBG funding, resulting in greater need for management, monitoring, and oversight of subrecipients by program staff.

Public Social Services
HUD imposes a statutory limit of 15% on the amount of CDBG entitlement funds that can be used for social services regardless of how great the local need is for these services.

The basic HUD eligibility criteria for social service projects are: 1) the program constitutes a new or expanded level of service at the time that it is first funded, 2) the program serves over 60% low-income families (those who earn less than 80% of the County median), and 3) the CDBG funds are not used to substitute another available funding source. In addition to HUD eligibility criteria, agencies will have to meet financial capacity prequalification guidelines, such as submission of two years of financial statement compilations and copies of Board minutes approving the financial statements, to be eligible to apply for City’s CDBG Program funds.

Capital Improvement and Neighborhood Improvement Projects Capital and neighborhood improvement funds represent 65% of CDBG entitlement funds, plus any available reprogrammed funds, which can only be used for capital and neighborhood improvement projects. Projects that qualify for this funding category include: community centers, such as parks, libraries, recreation centers, senior centers, youth centers, employment centers and social service centers; handicapped accessibility 13 of 126

25 26-90095
6 8
3 7
projects anywhere in the City; public improvements in low income neighborhoods; commercial rehabilitation; and economic development projects.

Traditionally, as part of the funding allocation plan, the City Council pre-designates and pre-approves City CIP deemed a priority and authorizes the issuance of a Request for Funding Proposal (RFP) to community agencies for the remainder of the CDBG funds.

Proposals are solicited from community agencies for PSS and the balance of capital improvement funds for community CIP. Any qualified non-profit community agency or public agency is eligible to apply for CDBG funds, provided that projects meet one of the two broad national objectives: 1) serving low-income persons, or 2) preventing or eliminating conditions of slums and blight. In addition, funded projects are required to serve primarily Glendale residents and not to discriminate in the provision of services.

Furthermore, projects that meet the identified program priorities are given preference for funding.

The proposal evaluation criteria used by the CDBG Advisory Committee includes:
1) Overall quality of the proposal;
2) Whether the project meets a program priority;
3) Ability of the applicant to substantiate that the project meets a community need; 4) Whether the proposal clearly articulates a target population/outreach strategy; 5) Financial capacity of the organization,
6) Demonstration of coordination and collaboration with other agencies/programs; 7) Program goals and outcomes;
8) Feasibility of proposed implementation plan;
9) Budget, cost effectiveness and leveraging of funds; and 10) Demonstrated experience, effectiveness, and administrative capacity of sponsoring Organization/City Department, including performance history.

Additional tools the Committee utilized to evaluate capacity and effectiveness of proposals included: 1) FY 2024-25 year end performance reports, 2) financial analysis report prepared by staff for each non-profit organization, and 3) proposal evaluation rating forms.

ESG PROGRAM
The ESG Program follows the same process as CDBG in terms of identification of homeless priorities, issuance of RFPs, and proposal evaluation, except that ESG funding proposals are reviewed and recommended by a separate homeless proposal review committee – the CoC Board. The CoC Board is guided by the specific needs of the CoC model of homeless services adopted by the Glendale CoC. The developed ESG funding plan is a two-year plan. ESG programs that request continued funding for the subsequent year and meet their program outcomes and performance goals are allowed renewal for funding subject to review and approval by the CoC Board. 14 of 126

26 26-90095
6 8
3 7
The published national objective of the ESG program is to help with the expansion, improvement and operation of emergency shelter facilities, supportive services, rapid re- housing, and homeless prevention.

The current CoC Board is comprised of the following members:

Board Member Agency
Melissa Younesian Verdugo Jobs Center
Capt. Alex Krikorian, Chair Glendale Police Department
Hagop Eulmessekian Glendale Unified School District
Jeffrey Brooks, Vice Chair Glendale Fire Department
Vacant Homeless Alumni
HOME
The Housing Authority is a Participating Jurisdiction under the HOME Program. As such, it receives an allocation each year directly from HUD to carry out affordable housing programs and projects.

The Housing Authority periodically updates a Statement of Interest to reflect its funding priorities. Like the CDBG and ESG programs, it seeks input from the community through the Annual Action Plan process to determine what housing needs exist. It also solicits Requests for Proposal from developers when sufficient funding is available for development of an affordable housing project. A review team consisting of city staff reviews proposals and provides recommendations to the Housing Authority for viable affordable housing developments.

The Housing Authority uses HOME funding, as well as other funding sources including Low Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund (LMIHAF), Measure S Funding, Permanent Local Housing Allocation Program Funding, and Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program to create affordable housing programs and projects. The City Council can also assign General Fund monies for housing related purposes.

Action Plan Development
September 23,2025
As part of the development of the Annual Action Plan, staff held an annual CDBG Open House event in a virtual platform, inviting over ninety-nine non-profit organizations to participate via Microsoft Teams. Fourteen representatives from eleven non-profit community agencies attended the Open House to learn about the CDBG program.

October 1, 2025
An in-person community meeting was held to gather input from residents to identify needs and determine program priorities for CDBG, ESG and HOME programs.

November 18, 2025
As part of the annual program planning cycle, staff presented the CDBG Advisory Committee recommendations to City Council/Housing Authority, which approved: a 15 of 126

27 26-90095
6 8
3 7
preliminary proposed FY 2026-2027 CDBG Funding Allocation Plan by Funding Category; program priorities; and issuance of an RFP for PSS programs and CIP based on estimated $1,700,000 CDBG entitlement funding from HUD.

A mandatory Technical Support Workshop was held to review the CDBG RFP cycle and to provide in-person demonstration/training to community agencies utilizing the ZoomGrants System, an online grant management system. Upon completion of the workshop, attendees received a link to ZoomGrants to begin the RFP application process.

The proposed FY 2026-27 Funding Allocation Plan by Funding Category was based on an estimated $1,700,000 in CDBG entitlement funds:
$340,000 (20%) for Administration (planning, program management and oversight)
$255,000 (15%) for public social services programs
$1,105,000 (65%) for capital improvement projects
-$1,105,000 undesignated and available to community agencies for community CIP projects.

Request For Proposal Process:

The RFP issued on November 19, 2025, was based on an estimated $1,700,000 in entitlement funds. A total of eighteen CDBG, PSS and CIP funding proposals were received; one proposal withdrew from consideration and seventeen proposals were evaluated by staff and the CDBG Advisory Committee through a Strengths and Weakness Analysis.

The Committee, in a full-day session on February 27, 2026, interviewed each community agency requesting PSS and CIP funds. The Committee deliberated and developed funding recommendations based on an estimated CDBG entitlement amount. The final FY 2026-27 HUD Entitlement Funds for all programs is summarized below and is part of the final proposed Annual Action Plan:

CDBG $1,730,936
ESG $ 152,823
HOME $1,196,822 + $130,000 (Program Income)
Total $3,210,581
Based on the final HUD allocations released on April 10, 2026, the proposed FY 2026-27 Funding Allocation Plan for the CDBG Program is as follows:
$ 259,640 (15% of entitlement funds) for PSS.
$1,125,109 (65% of entitlement funds) for CIP
o$1,125,109 for community agency CIP
o$0 for predesignated City CIP
$ 346,187 (20% of entitlement funds) for planning, program management and oversight.
16 of 126

28 26-90095
6 8
3 7
Public Social Services
Fourteen proposals were received for PSS programs totaling $756,920, which exceeded the available funding amount of $259,640 by $497,280. One agency withdrew from consideration prior to proposal review, and another agency withdrew before Committee deliberations (Kids Community Clinic of Burbank). Ultimately, ten programs were recommended for funding. Two programs, Ascencia’s Mental Health Program and Verdugo Hills Council’s Scoutreach South Glendale program, were not recommended for funding.

The Committee recommendations were based on a lower total amount, as the final HUD allocations were not released at the time of the meeting. The Committee also approved a CDBG Contingency Plan, giving staff direction on how to adjust the funding recommendations should the final HUD allocations come in higher/lower than the estimate. The CDBG Contingency Plan was to equally increase or decrease funding to all funded agencies, except for the Housing Rights Center, based on the final HUD allocation, but not to decrease funding from a funded agency if the recommended funding is $10,000.

Below is a summary of PSS final funding recommendations:

PROGRAM CATEGORY/PROJECTS/SPONSOR

RECOMMENDED
FY 2026-2027

FUNDING
YOUTH AND TEEN PROGRAMS:

AESA STEM Academy, Armenian Engineers and Scientists of America $10,520 Intervention/Prevention Clinical Group Counseling, CASPS $35,515 Youth Employment Program, Glendale Youth Alliance $15,515 Subtotal $61,550
ADULT COUNSELING & CASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS:

Pro Bono Legal Clinic, Armenian Bar Association $25,515 Community Outreach Program, Armenian Relief Society $65,515 Fair Housing Program, Housing Rights Center
(Additional funding from Section 8 Earned Administration Funds- $10,000 for a total allocation of $20,000)
$10,000
Subtotal $101,030
HOMELESS PROGRAMS:

Glendale Community Center Loaves and Fishes, Catholic Charities of Los Angeles, Inc. $30,515
Crisis Aid for Homeless Families, Home Again, Los Angeles $15,515 17 of 126

29 26-90095
6 8
3 7
The top three highest percentages of PSS funding by program category are as follows:
adult counseling and case management programs at 39% ($101,030). homeless services programs at 37% ($97,060)
youth programs (in-school programs, enrichment programs, afterschool programs, youth employment, and teen programs) at 24% ($61,550).

In addition to the CDBG funding for PSS programs, the City uses other non-CDBG funds to leverage programs provided by community agencies. For example, the City has leveraged Section 8 Earned Administration funds and CDBG funds to fund the Housing Rights Center’s (HRC) Fair Housing Program for fair housing services and tenant landlord information. The current contract amount for the FY 2025-26 Fair Housing Program is $20,000, which includes $10,000 in CDBG funding and $10,000 in Section 8 Earned Administration funding. A similar split is recommended for FY 2026-27.

Capital Improvement Projects
Four community agencies submitted proposals, totaling $1,459,989, which is $334,880 over the available CIP allocation of $1,125,109. All four projects were recommended for funding, with three projects receiving reduced funding and one being fully funded.

The City did not have any pre-designated projects in FY 2026-27, but plans to present a project in FY 2027-28 for consideration.

Below is a summary of the CIP final funding recommendations:

Transitional Housing DV Mental Health & Case Management, Door of Hope $20,515
Mental Health Services for Survivors of Domestic Violence, YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena $30,515
Subtotal $97,060
TOTAL PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $259,640

RECOMMENDED PROJECT/SPONSOR

RECOMMENDED
FY 2026-2027

FUNDING

COMMUNITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Armenian Society of Los Angeles Solar Panel Project, Armenian Society of Los Angeles $206,703
YMCA Residence Building Plumbing &Hot Water Systems Project, YWCA of Glendale $60,000
Expansion of Dental Treatments for Low Income Children, Kid’s Community Clinic of Burbank $651,703
Gate and Stairs Project, Verdugo Hills Council Scouting America $206,703 Subtotal $1,125,109
18 of 126

210
26-90095
6 8
3 7
CDBG Cancelled/Unused Funds
Staff are requesting for Council to authorize the City Manager to redirect excess, cancelled, or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval. This authorization will allow staff to work with the CDBG Advisory Committee to reallocate funds, should there be a need, without having to come back to Council for such a small amount.

Although the PSS Contingency Plan approved by the CDBG Advisory Committee recommended distributing the increase/decrease in funding based on HUD’s final allocation equally among the agencies, except for the Housing Rights Center, staff’s final recommendation for PSS allocations differs slightly to round each allocation to a whole dollar amount and avoid cent-based budget figures:

Under the PSS category, staff reallocated the remaining $5.00 balance to the Armenian Engineers and Scientists of America, as the agency received the lowest funding recommendation, thereby avoiding the need to monitor a minimal remaining balance.

Similarly, although the CDBG Advisory Committee’s CIP Contingency Plan recommended distributing any increase or decrease in final allocation equally among the agencies, staff’s recommendation differs slightly to avoid allocating funds beyond the agency’s requested amount. Under the CIP category, staff distributed the additional available funds among three of the four agencies. The YMCA of Glendale was excluded because it is already recommended to receive $11 more than its original request. To avoid increasing funding beyond the requested amount, the remaining additional funds were distributed to the three agencies that were not fully funded.

Exhibit 2 provides a Summary List of FY 2026-27 CDBG Funds Requested and Recommended for Funding Based on Estimated and Final Allocations.

ESG Program
An RFP was issued on November 18, 2024. On February 26, 2025, the CoC Board reviewed the submissions and recommended funding for the ESG community projects listed below for FY 2025-26. Projects that meet performance goals may be considered for renewal in FY 2026-27. The RFP was based on the prior year’s ESG allocation of $155,123. However, the final FY 2025-26 allocation was $2,795 less and the FY 2026-27 and is $495 more than FY 2025-26. As a result, the City has adjusted the budgeted amount for “accounting for the use of grants” to align with HUD’s final funding allocation.

The FY 2026-27 ESG funding recommendations are as follows:

PRE-DESIGNATED CITY PROJECTS
Subtotal $0
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDING AVAILABLE: $1,125,109 19 of 126

211
26-90095
6 8
3 7
Ascencia- Emergency Housing Program $33,703
YWCA of Glendale-Domestic Violence Housing & Emergency $26,500 Shelter Program (Rapid Re-Housing)
Catholic Charities- Loaves & Fishes Homeless Prevention Program $37,236 HOME Again LA (New) $51,365
Rapid Re-Housing Program
City HMIS $0
Accounting for use of Grant Administration $4,019
GRAND TOTAL $152,823
HOME Program
HOME projects are not solicited in the same manner as for the CDBG and ESG programs.

Specific HOME projects are developed by the Housing Authority on an ongoing basis (through a continuous Statement of Interest that is updated periodically to reflect funding and priorities and through an RFP process when sufficient funds are available for a feasible development project). Also, as part of the process of developing the Annual Plan, HUD requires input from the community regarding housing needs and housing programs for the Housing Authority to consider when approving housing programs and projects.

The HOME planning and budgeting process is currently underway, and the FY 2026-27 Affordable Housing Budget will be brought to the Housing Authority for review later in June 2026. In addition to HOME funds, the Affordable Housing Budget also includes Section 8 Rental Assistance, federal CoC homeless funds, BEGIN Homeownership Program, the Affordable Housing Trust Fund expenditures, and program income from Low Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund.

The funding plan for the use of HOME funds will be determined as part of the Housing Authority’s review and approval of the annual Affordable Housing Budget, with consideration given to input received regarding housing needs as part of the CDBG, ESG and HOME Annual Plan community needs assessment process.

The HOME program is one of four major housing resources addressed in the City’s 2025- 2030 Consolidated Plan. The table below shows the four major funding sources and two additional funding sources, estimated FY2026-027 revenues from each, and percentage of total revenues for each.

Estimated Affordable Housing Revenue FY 2026-2027
Funding Source Estimated
Revenue
Percent of
Total Revenue
HOME Investment Program (Entitlement and
$130,000 in program income)
$1,326,822 2.16%
20 of 126

212
26-90095
6 8
3 7
Low Moderate Income Housing Asset Funds $1,239,000 2.02% Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program $55,475,266 90.36% Affordable Housing Trust Fund $42,344 0.07%
BEGIN Homeownership Program $10,000 0.02%
CoC Homeless Competitive Funding $3,298,618* 5.37%
TOTAL FUNDS $61,392,050 100%
* Carryover funds from FY 2025-2026
Generally, the budget allocates the majority of HOME funds for use in projects and programs that increase affordable housing opportunities and supply. Based on the current housing market, the greatest opportunity for increasing the affordable housing supply in the next year is through the Affordable Rental – New Construction and Acquisition/Rehabilitation Program. HOME funds are restrictive in that they can only be used for lower income households. Other HOME fund requirements typically include: a 25% match by developers; a reserve of 15% for a Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO); federal prevailing wages for larger housing projects; a commitment of funds to a specific project within 24 months (temporarily suspended); and a requirement for expenditure of funds within five years.

The entitlement amount for HOME funds in FY 2026-27 is $1,196,822. In addition, $130,000 is available from HOME program income for FY 2026-27 HOME projects.

HOME funds from FY 2026-27 and prior years represent the majority of funds that will be available in FY 2026-27 for new construction of affordable housing units. In addition, the City has accumulated HOME fund balances from prior program years that are available for eligible affordable housing activities, including the Hamilton Court rehabilitation activity (CHDO) and potential funding of a Tenant-Based Rental Assistance program contingent upon Consolidated Plan amendment.

Therefore, staff recommend that the funding strategies for the HOME program in FY 2026-27 include:
$897,617- Affordable Rental Development-New Construction and/or Acquisition $179,523- CHDO Set-Aside (15% of FY 2026-2027 allocation) $117,000- Program Income for Affordable Rental Development (90% of HOME program income)
21 of 126

213
26-90095
6 8
3 7
$683,361- Hamilton Court Rehabilitation – CHDO (Verdugo Housing Corporation; funded from prior year HOME CHDO fund balances, will carry over from FY 2025-26)
To Be Determined- HOME Tenant-Based Rental Assistance – EHV Bridge Program (contingent upon Consolidated Plan amendment and HUD concurrence; staff will be returning to Council at a later date to ask for the appropriation) Staff also recommends appropriation of $132,682 to pay for costs associated with planning, reporting, project development, and compliance monitoring of HOME projects.

This is equal to 10% of the HOME entitlement amount, plus 10% of program income.

Total HOME funds available are $1,326,822, reflecting the HOME allocation and anticipated program income only; the Hamilton Court rehabilitation activity is funded from prior year HOME CHDO fund balances and is not included in this total.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
The ConPlan is the main planning document that HUD uses to measure the City’s effectiveness and to approve the submission of Annual Action Plans and other funding applications. The greatest effort and emphasis to conduct a community needs assessment to gain input from the community and to identify program priorities comes with the development of the ConPlan and Action Plan.

Multiple platforms were used as part of the development of the Annual Action Plan to assess community needs and gather community input to determine program priorities for the upcoming year, including an in-person community meeting on October 1, 2025, that was advertised through the City/department website, City Connection newsletter, CSP newsletter, email distribution list, City department counters, community events, flyers at downtown Glendale businesses, Glendale Unified School District, Glendale Community College, non-profit email distribution list, social media platforms (Facebook, Instagram, X), and posted on Nextdoor.

HUD requires the City to publish a notice regarding CDBG, ESG and HOME funding recommendations in the newspaper, and conduct a public hearing to receive comments.

This year’s outreach efforts included an in-person meeting on April 8, 2026, as well as an option to send public comments by way of mail, email, or telephone call between April 1, 2026, through April 30, 2026. On March 12 and 16, 2026 a public notice was published in the Glendale Newspress.

During the months of March and April 2026, the City posted a public notice on the City’s webpage, social media, and in the Community Services & Parks Department (CSP) Newsletter informing residents of a public comment period. Furthermore, reminder e- mails were sent out to CSP contact lists, community non-profits, and posted on social media. Thirteen people attended the in-person Public Hearing; one email and one telephone comment was received. All comments were recorded in Exhibit 3.

FISCAL IMPACT
22 of 126

214
26-90095
6 8
3 7
CDBG, ESG, and HOME HUD entitlements totaling $3,210,581, which is included as part of the Proposed FY 2026-27 budget is outlined below:

Funding Source Amount
CDBG Fund $1,730,936
Emergency Solutions Grant Fund $ 152,823
Home Grant Fund ($1,196,822) + Program Income
($130,000)
$1,326,822
Total $3,210,581

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The Community Development Department, after conducting an Initial Study, prepared a Negative Declaration for the FY 2026-27 Annual Action Plan that was circulated for a 20- day public review period from April 15, 2026, to May 15, 2026. No comments were received. (See Exhibit 4). Staff is requesting the City Council adopt the negative declaration for the FY 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan.

If the Council and the Authority approve the Annual Action Plan and if the Council adopts the Resolution for the Environmental Negative Declaration, staff will place a 30-day notice in the newspaper informing the public that the approved Plans are available for study and comment. The Annual Action Plan will be submitted to HUD and implementation of the FY 2026-27 CDBG, ESG, and HOME programs will commence on July 1, 2026.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10% interest in the company proposed for contract in this Agenda Item Report are attached in Exhibit 5, in accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION

1. Do not approve the FY 2026-27 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plan, delaying or jeopardizing receipt of critical federal funding.

2. Consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Onnig Bulanikian, Director of Community Services & Parks 23 of 126

215
26-90095
6 8
3 7
Prepared by:

Arsine Isayan, Deputy Director of Community Development/Housing Maggie Kavarian, Community Services Manager
Pamela Jackson, Housing Coordinator
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: FY 2026-2027 Proposed CDBG Funding Allocation Plan by Funding Category
Exhibit 2: Summary List of FY 2026-2027 CDBG Funds Requested and Recommended for Funding Based on Estimated and Final Allocations Exhibit 3: Summary of Public Hearing and Public Comments Exhibit 4: Proposed Negative Declaration
Exhibit 5: Campaign Finance Disclosures
Exhibit 6: FY 2026-2027 Glendale CoC Board Meeting ESG Funding Deliberation Exhibit 7: FY 2026-2027 ESG Funding Allocation
24 of 126

1 RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE,

CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION UNDER THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR THE FY 2024-25

CDBG, ESG, AND HOME ANNUAL ACTION PLAN
WHEREAS, on April 15, 2026, the Director of Community Development—after having considered the Initial Study prepared on behalf of Community Services and Parks Department for the proposed Fiscal Year 2026-27 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and HOME Programs in the City of Glendale, California (“Project”)—directed that a Proposed Negative Declaration be prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, the proposed Negative Declaration—which is attached as Exhibit 4 to the June 2, 2026, report to the City Council and the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale and incorporated into this Resolution as if fully set forth—was published, was duly noticed as required by law, and was made available for a 20-day public review and comment period; and
WHEREAS, a final Negative Declaration has been prepared incorporating any comments received during the review period and any responses to those comments; and WHEREAS, the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment of the City of Glendale; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, the City Council acknowledges the findings of the Director of Community Development with respect to the preparation of the Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, the Glendale Community Development Department has been identified as the custodian of record for the Negative Declaration.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:

SECTION 1.The recitals set forth above are true and correct.

SECTION 2.The Negative Declaration for the Project was prepared in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State and Local Guidelines.

SECTION 3.The Negative Declaration has been presented to the City Council. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Initial Study, the Negative Declaration, and public comments, and finds on the whole record before it that there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment, and therefore, the City Council hereby certifies and adopts the Negative Declaration prepared for the Project.
25 of 126

2 Adopted this day of , 2026.

Mayor
ATTEST:

City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a joint meeting of the Council and Housing Authority of the City of Glendale held on the day of , 2026, and that same was adopted by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

City Clerk
26 of 126

1 7
1 5
6 MOTION
Moved by Council Member _______________________, seconded by Council Member ____________________________, that the City Council:

1. Has reviewed and approves the FY 2026-27 Annual Action Plan (“Plan”) for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and HOME Investment Partnership Act (HOME) Programs totaling $3,210,581, as more particularly outlined in the June 9, 2026, Joint Report to the City Council and Housing Authority, including its attachments and exhibits;

2. Authorizes staff to submit the Plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as recommended by the CDBG Advisory Committee, the Glendale Homeless Continuum of Care Board, and staff; and

3. Authorizes the City Manager, or a designee, to redirect excess, cancelled, or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
27 of 126

1 7
1 5
7 MOTION
Moved by Housing Authority Member _______________________, seconded by Housing Authority Member ____________________________, that the Housing Authority:

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
28 of 126

EXHIBIT 1

FY 24-25

FINAL HUD
Allocation
FY 25-26

FINAL HUD
Allocation
FY 26-27
Proposed HUD
Allocation
$1,733,207 $1,738,811 $1,730,936
HUD ENTITLEMENT: $0 $0 $0
CURRENT YEAR CDBG PROGRAM INCOME $0 $0 $0
UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE $146,795
REPROGRAMMED FUNDS* $552,629
PROGRAM ACTIVITIES:

ADMINISTRATION (20% of Entitlement): $346,641 $347,762 $346,187 (planning, program management and oversight)
PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES (15% of Entitlement): $259,980 $260,819 $259,640 Reprogrammed Funds:

COMMUNITY PROJECTS: (100%)
•AESA STEM Academy-Armenian Engineers and Scientists of America $10,498 $10,529 $10,520 •Mental Wellness in Atheletes Program- Homenetmen Glendale Ararat $0 $10,529 $0 •Pro Bono Legal Services-Armenian Bar Association $20,498 $20,529 $25,515 •Community Outreach Project-Armenian Relief Society $65,498 $64,529 $65,515 •Loaves and Fishes Homeless Prevention Program-Catholic Charities $28,898 $32,529 $30,515 •Intervention/Prevention Group Counseling Program-CASPS $34,498 $34,529 $35,515 •Domestic Violence Services-Door of Hope $20,498 $10,529 $20,515 •Youth Employment Program-Glendale Youth Alliance (GYA) $15,498 $10,529 $15,515 •Crisis Housing Support-Home Again LA $15,498 $15,529 $15,515 •Fair Housing Program-Housing Rights Center $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 •People's Choice Food Pantry-Salvation Army $0 $20,529 $0 •Mental Health Services for Survivors of DV-YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena $28,098 $20,529 $30,515 •Homeless Outreach Case Management-Ascencia $10,498 $0 $0 Public Social Services Sub-total$259,980 $260,819 $259,640 CAPITAL/NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS: $1,826,010 $1,130,230 $1,125,109 PRE-DESIGNATED PROJECTS: $870,000 $500,000 $0
• Elk Mini Park Project 25/26 $400,000
• Pelanconi Park Renovation Project $100,000
•FY23-24 Pacific Natural Grass Project $370,000
•FY24-25 Pac/Ed Artifical Turf Project $500,000
UN-DESIGNATED COMMUNITY PROJECTS: $956,010 $630,230 $1,125,109 •Lexington Office Historic Building Preservation & Rehab Project-YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena$630,230 •Bathroom Renovation Project at Main Campus-Homenetmen Ararat Chapter $433,540 •Glendale Community Center-Catholic Charities of Los Angeles $268,100 •First Floor Locker Room Project- YMCA of Glendale $254,370 •Armenian Socity of Los Angeles Solar Panel -Armenian Society of Los Angeles $206,703 •YMCA Residence Building Plumbing & Hot Water Systems-YMCA of Glendale $60,000 •Expansion of Dental Treatments for Low Income Children-Kid's Community Clinic of Burbank $651,703 •Gate and Stairs Project- Verdugo Hills Council Scouting America $206,703 FY PROJECTED EXPENDITURES: $2,432,631 $1,738,811 $1,730,936 Balance $0 $1,738,811 $1,730,936
Uncommitted Grant funds
FY 2026-2027 PROPOSED CDBG FUNDING ALLOCATION PLAN BY FUNDING CATEGORY 29 of 126

Exhibit 2

PROGRAM
FY 26-27

REQUESTED

FUNDING
FY 26-27

RECOMMENDATION

BASED ON

ESTIMATED

FUNDING
FY 26-27

RECOMMENDED

FUNDING BASED

ON FINAL HUD

ALLOCATION

DIFFERENCE
PRE-APPROVED CITY PROJECTS:
-$
FUNDING REQUEST CITY PROJECTS SUB-TOTAL -$ -$ -$
COMMUNITY PROJECTS:
1 Armenian Society of Los Angeles, Armenian Society of Los Angeles Solar Panel Project 350,000.00$ 200,000.00$ 206,703.00$ 143,297.00-$ 2 YMCA of Glendale, YMCA Residence Building Plumbing & Hot Water Systems Project 59,989.00$ 60,000.00$ 60,000.00$ 11.00$ 3 Kid's Community Clinic of Burbank, Expansion of Dental Treatments for Low Income Children 800,000.00$ 645,000.00$ 651,703.00$ 148,297.00-$ 4 Verdugo Hills Council, Scouting America, Gate and Stairs Project 250,000.00$ 200,000.00$ 206,703.00$ 43,297.00-$ FUNDING REQUEST COMMUNITY PROJECTS SUB-TOTAL 1,459,989.00$ 1,105,000.00$ 1,125,109.00$ 334,880.00-$ TOTAL FUNDING REQUESTS FOR CITY/COMMUNITY AGENCY 1,459,989.00$ 1,105,000.00$ 1,125,109.00$

AVAILABLE FUNDING
Estimated FY 2026-2027 CDBG CIP Funding 1,105,000.00$
FINAL FY 2026-2027 CDBG CIP Funding 1,125,109.00$ -$ -$ Undesignated Fund Balance from Previous Program Years -$ -$ -$ TOTAL FINAL FY 2026-2027 CDBG CIP AVAILABLE FUNDS 1,125,109.00$ 1,125,109.00$ 1,125,109.00$ DIFFERENCE 334,880.00-$ 20,109.00$ -$ Summary List of FY 2026-2027 CDBG Funds Requested and Recommended for Funding Based on Estimated and Final Allocations

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
30 of 126

Exhibit 2

AGENCY PROGRAM
FY 26-27

REQUESTED

FUNDING
FY 26-27

RECOMMENDATION

BASED ON

ESTIMATED

FUNDING
FY 26-27

RECOMMENDED

FUNDING BASED

ON FINAL HUD

ALLOCATION
Difference
1 Armenian Engineers and Scientists of America AESA STEM Academy 29,150.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,520.00$ 18,630-$ 2 Armenian Bar Association Pro Bono Legal Services 54,676.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,515.00$ 29,161-$ 3 Armenian Relief Society of Western USA Community Outreach Program 143,489.00 $ 65,000.00$ 65,515.00$ 77,974-$ 4 Ascencia Ascencia Mental Health 20,000.00$ -$ -$
20,000-$
5 Catholic Charities of Los Angeles Loaves & Fishes Program 61,478.00$ 30,000.00$ 30,515.00$ 30,963-$ 6 Committee for Armenian Students in Public Schools Intervention/Prevention Clinical Group Counseling 67,985.00$ 35,000.00$ 35,515.00$ 32,470-$ 7 Door of Hope Transitional Housing DV Mental Health & Case Management 60,842.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,515.00$ 40,327-$ 8 Glendale Youth Alliance Youth Employment Program 50,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,515.00$ 34,485-$ 9 Home Again Los Angeles Crisis Aid for Homeless Families 50,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,515.00$ 34,485-$ 10 Housing Rights Center Fair Housing Services 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ -$ 11 Kids Community Clinic of Burbank City of Glendale Dental Treatments &Education for LI Children -$ -$ -$ 12 Verdugo Hills Council, Scouting America Scoutreach South Glendale 60,000.00$ -$ 60,000-$
13 YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena Mental Health Services for Survivors of Domestic Violence 60,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 30,515.00$ 29,485-$ 667,620$ 255,000$ 259,640.00$ 407,980-$ 259,640$ 255,000$ 259,640.00$ 259,640$ (407,980)$ -$
-$ (407,980) $

TOTAL PUBLIC SERVICES

FUNDS AVAILABLE

DEFICIT/SURPLUS
Summary List of FY 2026-2027 CDBG Funds Requested and Recommended For Funding Based on Estiamted and Final Allocations

PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICES
31 of 126

Exhibit 3
Summary of Public Hearing and Public Comments
Regarding the City of Glendale’s
Proposed FY 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan for
CDBG, ESG, and HOME Programs
Public Hearing, April 8, 2026, Adult Recreation Center, 201 East Colorado Street:

The Public Hearing was called to order at 7:15 p.m.
13 total in attendance.

Maggie Kavarian, Community Services M anager opened the public hearing for the FY 2026-2027 Consolidated P lan and Annual Plan and introduced city staff in attendance.

Arsineh Isayan, and Pam Jackson helped to present during the meeting. CDBG Advisory Committee Member Armik Avedisian was introduced to the attendees.

City staff provided a Power Poin t presentation which included: purpose of the meeting, a flowchart of the CDBG A nnual Program Planning Proces s FY2026-2027; CDBG funding allocation plan, and the proposed FY2026-2027 Annual Ac tion P lan for Community Development Block Grant, Emergency Solutions Grant, and HOME Programs; and encouraged public comment.

During the presentations, attendees were provided in depth review of the P rogram Planning, highlights of the s teps in the process to conduc t the public hearing to rev iew and obtain comments from the public regarding the proposed funding recommendations for the FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs.

Ms. Kavarian stated that the funding re commendations will be submitted to the City Council for final approval on an estimated date in May or June 2026. P resentation included: Proposal Evaluation Process to the attendees and explained how City Staff receive, evaluate, and prepare the pr oposals for CDBG Advisory Board rev iew.

Highlights of the CDBG Advisory B oard Meeting on February 27, 2026 and the deliberation and decision making process of the Board was presented.

Ms. Isayan explained the ESG pr ogram process and how agencies are funded to combat Homelessness welcoming and encouraging public comment.

Next, Ms. Jackson explained the HOME progr am and the upcoming projects in the pipeline for affordable housing by use of HOME funds.

The public was also reminded that all comments would be submitted to the City Council and Housing Authority in writing.
1 32 of 126

Exhibit 3
2 MEETING COMMENTS
o
The Kid’s Community Dental Clinic is an incredible organization that has provided so many services to the patient population in Glendale. The CDBG funding recommendation will provide much needed financial assistance to allow KCDC to establish itself as a pillar within Glendale to provide essential dental treatment and dental education to low-income families in the Community. We thank you for funding this incredible Project.
o The Kid’s Community Clinic is grateful for funding and the welcome by the City of Glendale that allows us to expend to help more children.

We have been supported by the City of Glendale Community Services and Parks Department as well as encouraged by the CDBG advisory Committee members who are each professional and supportive of all the applicants. Thank you for your professionalism for fundings approvals. o As the Former Manager of the YMCA Hotel, this money will be put to great use. 30 people per floor use this 100-year-old Building’s Bathrooms.

The improvements will seriously improve the lives of the current Residents.
o Verdugo Hills Council, Scouting America is grateful to Partner with CDBG.

The grants allow our organization to serve all youth and keep them safe at our new home so we can enrich their lives. Having gate and fencing and stairs will allow us to have outdoor activities without worrying. Maggie and her team do a wonderful presentation to share the information to everyone.
o Verdugo Hills Council Scouting America (BSA) has served youth in the City of Glendale for over 100 years. In addition to serving youth, it serves as the youth leadership program for multiple non profit organizations in Glendale including public and private schools. Homenetmen and others.

Our new location at 421 N Glendale Ave is in need of a security gate and securing outdoor stairs to assist with protecting all youth and building from breaking and trespass by unhoused citizens in our community. o CDBG funding will allow us to focus on general funding an serving our at risk youth in lieu of capital improvements.
o The Armenian Society of LA has a very productive Project and the Community will profit enormously provided that it serves to the Purpose. 33 of 126

Exhibit 3
3 o Housing Rights Center has been a long-time partner with City of Glendale by providing tenants and landlords with education and outreach resources to better inform the Community of their rights and responsibilities especially in context of fair housing discrimination. We appreciate the City’s recommendation to fund HRC for the fiscal year to continue our fight to combat discrimination and inform the Community on their housing rights.
o Please create more volunteer opportunities for youth.

Pam Jackson from the HOME program answered housing related questions.

Arsine Isayan from ESG program answered homeless services questions.

Ms. Kavarian thanked everyone for attending the meeting and officially closed the Public Hearing.

The meeting was adjourned at 8:28 p.m.

EMAIL COMMENT:

Hello,
I am a Glendale resident and had a chance to review the 2026-2027 CBDG plan and wanted to endorse perhaps moving some of th e money away from certain programs to help fund the request from Ascencia Mental Health Ser
vices.

I don't see why we would need to give a full $65,000 to the Armenian Relief Society of Western USA, Inc. It feels more appropriate to give them a bit less to help fund Ascencia which is doing great work for getting homeless people off of our streets.

And $30,000 to the Fishes and Loaves Catholic church progr am also seems excessive when the Catholic Church receives massive tax breaks from the federal government. I am Catholic and think this charity does great work, however they do NOT need $30k.

The Glendale Youth Alliance seems to be a redundant grant as well . There are several grants already going towards the schools and youth.

Is it too late to move some of these funds around? What is the process for changes? 34 of 126

Exhibit 3
4 Thank you for your help!
TELEPHONE COMMENTS WERE RECEIVED.

Hi my name is jeanette and you guys had a meeting at the senior center yesterday and i couldn't make it but i would like t
o know if i can pick up some whatever you're handing
out there i don't know if you had books or br ochures or flyers so i can have housing resources and i also wanted to ask you some questions about housing opportunities. 35 of 126

Jack Wong, Interim Director of Community Development
Project
Location: Citywide, Glendale, Los Angeles County
Project Applicant: City of Glendale
Community Services Department & Parks Department
613 E. Broadway, Room 120
Glendale, CA 91206
The Proposed Negative Declaration and all documents referenced therein are available for review in the Community Development Department office, Room 103 of the Municipal Services Building, 633 East Broadway, Glendale, California 91206-4386 and on the Planning Division website https://www.glendaleca.gov/government/departments/community-development/development- services/current-projects/environmental-review. Information on the proposed project can be obtained from the Community Development Department, Planning Division at (818) 548-2115.

Information on public hearings or meetings for the proposed project can be obtained from the Community Services and Parks Department at (818) 548-2060.

Written comments may be submitted to the Community Development Department, Planning Division office, at the address listed above for a period of 30 days after publication of this notice.

Public Notice Published: April 15, 2026
Proposed Negati
ve Declaration Comment Period: April 15, 2026 to May 15, 2026 Exhibit 4

PUBLIC NOTICE

CITY OF GLENDALE

NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:

The Community Development Department, after having conducted an Initial Study, has prepared a Negative Declaration for the following project:

Project Description:

City of Glendale Community Services and Parks Department’s Fiscal Year 2026- 2027 Action Plan for Community Development Block Grant, Emergency Solutions Grant and HOME Programs. 36 of 126

PROPOSED

NEGATIVE DECLARATION
FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG and HOME Programs
The following Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as amended, the State Guidelines, and the Environmental Guidelines and Procedures of the City of Glendale.

Project Title/Common Name: FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG and HOME Programs Project Location: Glendale, Los Angeles County, California: Glendale is located northeast of downtown Los Angeles. It is bounded by the cities of Burbank, Pasadena, La Canada Flintridge and the Los Angeles communities of Tujunga, Eagle Rock, and Los Feliz.

Project Description: Action Plan prepared by the City of Glendale Community Services and Parks Department for the fiscal year 2025-2026 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG), and HOME programs.

Project Type: Private Project Public Project
Project Applicant: Maggie Kavarian, Community Services Manager City of Glendale Community Services and Parks Department 200 E. Colorado Street
Glendale, CA 91206
Findings: The Director of the Community Development, on April 15, 2026, after considering an Initial Study prepared by the Planning Division, found that the above referenced project would not have a significant effect on the environment and instructed that a Negative Declaration be prepared.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

Attachments: Initial Study Checklist
Contact Person: Dennis Joe, Principal Planner
City of Glendale, Community Development Department
633 East Broadway, Room 103
Glendale, CA 91206-4386
Tel: (818) 548-8157
Fax: (818) 240-0392
37 of 126

APRIL 2026
FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 2
This page left intentionally blank.
38 of 126

INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Programs
FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 3
1 . Project Title: FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG, and HOME Programs

2. Lead Agency Name and Address:

City of Glendale Community Development Department
Planning Division
633 East Broadway, Room 103
Glendale, CA 91206

3. Contact Person and Phone Number:

Dennis Joe, Principal Planner
Tel: (818) 937-8157
Fax: (818) 240-0392

4. Project Location: Glendale, Los Angeles County, California: Glendale is located northeast of downtown Los Angeles. It is bounded by the cities of Burbank, Pasadena, La Canada Flintri dge and t
he Los Angeles communities of Tujunga, Eagle Rock and Los Feliz.

5. Project Sponsor’s Name and Address:

Maggie Kavarian, Community Services Manager
City of Glendale Community Services and Parks Department 200 E. Colorado Street
Glendale, CA 91206

6. General Plan Designation: N/A

7. Zoning: N/A

8. Description of the Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to, later
phases of the project, and any secondary support or off-site features necessary for its implementation.)
Action Plan prepared by the City of Glendale Community Services and Parks Department for the fis
cal year 2026-2027 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and HOME programs. See attached Action Plan for full description.

9. Surrounding Land Uses and Se tting:

T
he projects are located throughout the City of Glendale, and as such the surrounding uses vary depending on location.

10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval or participation agreement).

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
39 of 126

APRIL 2026
FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESGAND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 4

11. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected:

The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact,” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.

Aesthetics Agriculture and Forest Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology / Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards / Hazardous Materials Hydrology / Water Quality Land Use / Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population / Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources
Utilities / Service Systems Wildfire Mandatory Findings of Significance LEAD AGENCY DETERMINATION:

On the basis of this initial evaluation:

I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.

Signature of Director of Community Development or his or her designee authorizing the release of environmental document for public review and comment.
4//2026
Director of Community Development: Date:
environmental docu
for
40 of 126

APRIL 2026
FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 5
A. AEST HETICS
Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section
21099, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X

2. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway?
X

3. In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade th e
ex
isting visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are ex
perienced from publicly accessible vantage point.)
If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations
governing scenic quality?
X

4. Create a new source of substantial light or glare whic h woul
d adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
X
Comments to Sections A(1), (2), (3), and (4):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on aesthetics as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand.

As such, these programs would not adversely affect scenic vistas, damage scenic resources, degrade the visual character of any sites or create substantial light or glare.

Potential aesthetic impacts could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project- specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. 41 of 126

APRIL 2026
FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 6
B.

AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use
in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In
determining whether impacts to forest resources,
including timberland, are significant environmental
effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire
Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and
the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols
adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would
the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
M
apping and Monitoring Program of the California
Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
X

2. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? X

3. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code
s
ection 12220(g)) or timberland (as defined in Public
Resources Code section 4526)?
X

4. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? X

5. Involve other changes in the existing environm ent
whi
ch, due to their location or nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or
c
onversion of forest land to non-forest use?
X
In de
termining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997, as updated) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board.
42 of 126

A PRIL 2026

FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS P AGE 7
C. AIR QUALITY
Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution
control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan? X

2. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions
which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)?
X

3. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations? X

4. Result in other emissions (such as those leading to
odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of
people?
X
Comments to Sections B(1), (2), (3) and (4):

The City of Glendale does not contain any agricultural resources or lands currently zoned for agricultural uses; instead, Glendale is an urbanized area with a mixture of commercial, residential and industrial uses. Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs would not have a negative impact on agricultural resources because there is no “prime farmland,” “unique farmland” or “farmland of statewide importance” that could be converted to non-agricultural use; no existing zoning for agricultural use or Williamson Act contracts; and no farmland that could be converted to non-agricultural use. There is no existing zoning of forest land or timberland in the City of Glendale. No forest land could be converted to non-forest use under the proposed project.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

D. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service?
X

2. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
X

3. Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to,
marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other
means?
X

4. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife
X
43 of 126

A PRIL 2026

FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS P AGE 8
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?

5. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
X

6. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
X
Comments to Sections D(1), (2), (3), (4), (5) and (6):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on biological resources as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect biological resources.

Potential impacts on biological resources could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

E. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource pursuant to
§15064.5?
X

2. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource pursuant
to §15064.5?
X

3. Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries? X
Comments to Sections E(1), (2), and (3):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on cultural resources as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect cultural resources.

Potential impacts on cultural resources could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

44 of 126

A PRIL 2026

FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS P AGE 9

F. ENERGY
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
X

2. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy efficiency? X
Comments to Sections F(1) and (2):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on energy as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect energy consumption or obstruct with state of local energy plans.

Potential impacts on energy could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project- specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

45 of 126

A PRIL 2026

FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS P AGE 10
G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:

i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.

X
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction? X
iv) Landslides? X

2. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil? X

3. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in on-or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction
or collapse?
X

4. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- 1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994, as
updated), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property?
X

5. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the
use of septic tanks or alternative waste water
disposal systems where sewers are not available for
the disposal of waste water?
X

6. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X
Comments to Sections F(1)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv), (2), (3), (4), (5) and (6):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with geology and soils as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect geology and soils.

Potential impacts associated with geology and soils could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

46 of 126

A PRIL 2026

FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS P AGE 11
H. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment?
X

2. Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases?
X
Comments to Sections H(1) and (2):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with greenhouse gases as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not result in direct or indirect impacts related to the generation of greenhouse gases or conflict with applicable plans.

Potential impacts associated with greenhouse gases could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

I. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
X

2. Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
X

3. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
X

4. Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
X

5. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project site?
X
47 of 126

A PRIL 2026

FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS P AGE 12
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

6. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
X

7. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or
where residences are intermixed with wildlands?
X
Comments to Sections I(1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6) and (7):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with hazards and hazardous materials as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect hazards and hazardous materials.

Potential impacts associated with hazards and hazardous materials could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

J. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise substantially
degrade surface of groundwater quality?
X

2. Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such
that the project may impede sustainable groundwater
management of the basin?
X

3. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of stream or river or through the addition of
impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:

i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- site; X
ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result in
floodin
g on- or off-site;
X
iii) create or contribute runoff water which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or
X
iv) impede or redirect flood flows? X

4. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? X

5. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water
quality control plan or sustainable groundwater
management plan?
X
48 of 126

A PRIL 2026

FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS P AGE 13
Comments to Sections J(1), (2), (3)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (4) and (5):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with hydrology and water quality as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect hydrology and water quality.

Potential impacts associated with hydrology and water quality could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

K. LAND USE AND PLANNING
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Physically divide an established community? X

2. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance)
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
X

3. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X
Comments to Sections K(1) (2) and (3):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with land use and planning as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. Most of the programs are included in the City’s updated Housing Element adopted in December 2022. As such, these programs would not adversely affect land use and planning.

Potential impacts associated with land use and planning could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

49 of 126

A PRIL 2026

FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS P AGE 14
L. MINERAL RESOURCES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
X

2. Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
X
Comments to Sections L(1) and (2):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with the availability of know mineral resources as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect mineral resources.

Potential impacts associated with the availability of know mineral resources could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

M. NOISE
Would the project result in:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent
increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies?
X

2. Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels? X

3. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a
plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
X
Comments to Sections M(1), (2) and (3):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with noise as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect noise.

Potential impacts associated with noise could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in 50 of 126

A PRIL 2026

FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS P AGE 15
subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

N. POPULATION AND HOUSING
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new
homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example,
through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
X

2. Displace substantial numbers of existing people or
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
X

Comments to Sections N(1) and (2):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with population and housing as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect population and housing.

Potential impacts associated with population and housing could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

O. PUBLIC SERVICES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts
associated with the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance ob
jectives for any of the public services:

a) Fire protection? X
b) Police protection? X
c) Schools? X
d) Parks? X
e) Other public facilities? X
Comments to Sections O(1)(a),(b), (c), (d) and (e):
51 of 126

A PRIL 2026

FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS P AGE 16
Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associated with public services as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect public services.

Potential impacts associated with public services could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

P. RECREATION

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
X

2. Does the project include recreational facilities or
require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities which might have an adverse physical effect
on the environment?
X
Comments to Sections P(1) and (2):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on recreational facilities as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect recreational uses.

Conversely, the proposed programs included in the action plan would help to relieve existing pressure on the recreational facilities by providing after school programs away from park sites.

Potential impacts on recreational facilities could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

52 of 126

A PRIL 2026

FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS P AGE 17
Q. TRANSPORTATION
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Conflict with program, plan, ordinance or policy
addressing the circulation system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
X

2. Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines
Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? X

3. Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
X

4. Result in inadequate emer gency access? X
Comments to Sections Q(1), (2), (3) and (4):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on transportation as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand.

As such, these programs would not adversely affect transportation.

Potential impacts associated with transportation could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

R. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined
in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as
either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape
that is geographically defined in terms of the
size and scope of the landscape, sacred place,
or object with cultural value to a California
Native American tribe, and that is:

i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in the
local register of historical resources as
defined in Public Resources Code Section
5020.1(k), or
X
ii) A resource determined by the lead agency,
in its discretion and supported by
substantial evidence, to be significant
pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision
(c) of Public Resources Code Section
5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code
Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall
consider the significance of the resource to
a California Native American tribe.

X
53 of 126

A PRIL 2026

FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS P AGE 18
Comments to Sections R(1)(i) and (ii):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on tribal cultural resources as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect tribal cultural resources.

Potential impacts associated with tribal cultural resources could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

S. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or
stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the construction or
relocation of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
X

2. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development
during normal, dry and multiple dry years?
X

3. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected
demand in addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
X

4. Generate solid waste in excess of state or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of
solid waste reduction goals?
X

5. Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid
waste?
X
Comments to Sections S(1), (2), (3), (4) and (5):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact on utilities and service systems as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect utilities and service systems.

Potential impacts on utilities and service systems could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project-specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

54 of 126

A PRIL 2026

FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS P AGE 19

T. WILDFIRE
If located in or near state responsibility area or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones,
would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Substantially impair an adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan? X

2. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project
occupants to, pollutant concentrations from wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
X

3. Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel, breaks, emergency
water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
X

4. Expose people or structures to significant risks,
including downslope or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
X
Comments to Sections T(1), (2), (3) and (4):

Implementation of the action plan prepared for the FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to have a negative impact associate with wildfires as most of the projects involve public social service programs that do not propose physical changes to the existing built environment. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs would not adversely affect wildfires.

Potential wildfire impacts could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project- specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

U. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. Does the project have the potential to substantial
degrade the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially reduce the number or restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California histor
y or prehistory?
X

2. Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively
considerable” means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
pro
jects.)
X
55 of 126

APRIL 2026
FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG AND HOME PROGRAMS PAGE 20
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

3. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
X
Comments to Sections U(1), (2) and (3):

Implementation of the action plan for the FY 2026-2027 CDBG, ESG and HOME programs is not anticipated to degrade biological resources or the overall quality of the natural environment; eliminate important historic or prehistoric resources; have environmental effects causing substantial adverse effects on humans; or have cumulatively considerable impacts. In addition, the majority represent a continuation of existing programs that are not proposed to expand. As such, these programs are not considered cumulatively considerable.

Potential cumulative impacts could result from capital and neighborhood improvement projects that are also part of the action plan. However, these projects would be evaluated in subsequent project- specific environmental review under CEQA when specific project data becomes available.

13. Ear
lier Analyses
None

14. Project References Used to Prepare Initial Study Checklist One or more of the following references were incorporated into the Initial Study by reference, and ar e av
ailable for review in the Planning Division Office, 633 E. Broadway, Rm. 103, Glendale, CA 91206- 4386. Items used are referred to by number on the Initial Study Checklist.

1. Proposed Action Plan prepared by the City of Glendale Community Development and Housi ng Depar
tment for the fiscal year 2026-2027 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) , Emer
gency Shelter Grant (ESG), and HOME programs.

2. The City of Glendale’s General Plan, “Open Space and Conservation Element,” as amended.

3. California Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, Los Angeles County Important Farmland 2010 (September 2011).

4. California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Special Publication 42 (
Revised 1997, Supplements 1 and 2 added 1999).

5. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning (May 2005).

6. City of Glendale, General Plan, “Safety Element” (2025).

7. California Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation, State of California General Plan Guidelines (2023).

8. City of Glendale Municipal Code, as amended.
56 of 126

City of Glendale

DISCLOSURE - CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE
The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5744, “Campaign Finance Ordinance,” which became effective on September 9, 2011, and amended it with Ordinance No. 5768, which became effective on March 15, 2012 (“the Ordinance”). The Ordinance prohibits: (1) A contractor* (including a subcontractor**)― who has a contract with the City of Glendale (“City”), Economic Development Department (“EDD”), or the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale (“HA”) and that contract is subject to approval by the City Council, EDD, or HA― from making a contribution to a City Council member, EDD member, HA member, City Clerk, or City Treasurer; and (2) Council members, EDD members, and HA members from voting on matters concerning a contract with a person who has provided a campaign contribution.

The Ordinance applies to a contractor whose contract requires the City Council’s, EDD's, or HA’s approval. A contract with the City, EDD, or HA is known as a “City Contract.” The Ordinance also applies to a subcontractor who has a subcontract through a City Contract. The Ordinance excludes a competitively bid contract awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.

To assist members of the City Council, EDD, and HA before they vote on a matter regarding a City Contract, the Ordinance requires City staff to prepare this report which discloses certain information about: the contractor receiving the City Contract, and the subcontractor(s) working under the City Contract.

A contractor must provide the information listed below when: A subcontractor must provide the information listed below when:
•The City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $50,000 or more; or • The subcontract through a City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $25,000 or more; or
• A combination or series of City Contracts have a value of $50,000 or more. • A combination or series of subcontract s, for the same or different projects, have an aggregate value of $25,000 or
more. Information that must be disclosed: ● Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) ● Name of the Chief Executive Officer/Pres
ident
● Chief Op
erating Officer
● Chief Financial Officer
● Chairperson
● All members
of the Board of Directors
● All persons who own more than 10% of the person, en
tity, or organization
● Name of any
campaign committee owned or controlled by the person, entity, or organi zation Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
*“Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, EDD, or HA or any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Direct ors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operat ing Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entit y, or organization, and any campaign committee that is o wned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Exhibit 5
57 of 126

Rev. 6/7/12 J:\FILES\DOCFILES\ORD\CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION\DISCLOSURE FORM – CONTRACTOR – 6-7-12.doc Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or gener al or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contrac tor. Subcontractor includes any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financ ial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select addition.a0-l― architects,= design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:

Ani Keshishyan
Karine Grigoryan
Narine Petrosyan
Please see attached
1255 S. Central Avenue
Glendale
CA
91204
1255 S. Central Avenue
1255 S. Central Avenue
Glendale
Glendale
CA
CA
91204
91204
N/A
3 April 28
26 Glendale
1255 S. Central Avenue Glendale CA 91204
Karine Grigoryan
818-548-2790
[email protected]
Glendale Youth Alliance
1255 S. Central Avenue, Glendale CA 91204
58 of 126

GLENDALE YOUTH ALLIANCE BOARD OF DIRECTOR
Address: 1255 S. Central Avenue, Glendale CA 91203
Executive Board

Ani Keshishian, Chair
PDC of GCC
(661)257-0264 Cell [email protected]
Dr. Ilin Magran, Vice Chair
Senior Adjunct Professor at University of La Verne
(818) 434-2504 [email protected]

Narine Petrosyan, Treasurer
Pogosian Tax Planning Inc.
(818) 689-3404 [email protected]

Caroline Craun,
Ellis Family Stores [email protected]

Dr. Vahe Peroomian, Past Chair
Professor –USC
(818) 602-0276 [email protected]
Board of Directors
Christopher Anwary
LA County Public Health
(818)572-7843 Cell [email protected]

Alexander Derghazian
Edward Jones
(818) 507-0336 [email protected]
Dr. Armina Gharpetian,
Dentist, PCC Adjunct
(818)314-1169 [email protected]
Lt. Mark Hess
Glendale Police Department
(818) 612-5582 [email protected]

Rob Mikitarian
Glendale Adult Health Day Care
(818) 652-8800 Cell [email protected]

Jemma Pogosian
Community Member
[email protected]

Police Chief Rafael Quintero,
Burbank Police Department
(818) 497-0043 Cell
(818) 238-3200 Office
[email protected]

Art Resendez
California Bank & Trust
(818) 726-2349
[email protected]

Jeanett C. Resendez
Community Member
[email protected]
Brielle Salazar
Citi Community Capital
(818)404-2762 Cell
[email protected]
Lusine Yarian
Glendale Fire Department
(818) 937-8815
[email protected]

59 of 126

60 of 126

61 of 126

City of Glendale

A contractor must provide the information listed below when: A subcontractor must provide the information listed below when:
•The City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $50,000 or more; or • The subcontract through a City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $25,000 or more; or
• A combination or series of City Contracts have a value of $50,000 or more. • A combination or series of subcontract s, for the same or different projects, have an aggregate value of $25,000 or
more. Information that must be disclosed: ● Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) ● Name of the Chief Executive Officer/Pre
siden t
● Chief Operating Officer
● Chief Financial Officer
● Chairper
son
● All members of the Board of Directors
● All persons who own more than 10% of the perso
n, entity, or organi zation
● Name of any campaign committee owned or controll ed by the person, entity, or organization Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Rev. 6/7/12 J:\FILES\DOCFILES\ORD\CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION\DISCLOSURE FORM – CONTRACTOR – 6-7-12.doc Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or gener al or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contrac tor. Subcontractor includes any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financ ial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional ― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclo sure; The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and I have been legally authorized to su bmit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:
63 of 126

December 2025

Board of Directors
CHAIR:

Tyler Lazarian
Chief Executive Officer, Electric Service & Supply Co.

VICE-CHAIR
Sarah Silk
Community Volunteer
TREASURER & CHAIR OF THE FINANCE COMMITTEE:

Joanne Mathew
AVP of Finance, Azusa Pacific University

SECRETARY & CHAIR OF BOARD GOVERNANCE
COMMITTEE:

Dick Kleinert
Principal, Deloitte Consulting LLP (Retired)

CHAIR OF DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Lisa Scott Benson
Chief Strategy Officer/President, Russ Reid (Retired)
MEMBERS:

Bill Podley
Broker Associate, DPP|Compass
Brian Kim
Portfolio Manager, Northern Trust
David Bunn
Attorney, Bunn& Bunn Attorneys at Law
David Lee
Chairman & CEO, Hing Wa Lee Group
Gerson Munoz
Asset Manager, Housing Authority of the City of LA
Joseph Montes
Attorney, Burke, Williams, & Sorensen, LLP
Renee MaGee
Associate Director of Housing Navigation Programs,
Union Station Homeless Services
ADVISORY BOARD:

Rev. Andy Bales
CEO, Union Rescue Mission (Retired)
Bob Joe
Councilmember, City of South Pasadena (Retired)
Keith Jespersen
Russ Reid Company (Retired)
Kerwin L. Manning
Senior Pastor & Head Coach, Pasadena Church
Stephen Lazarian, Jr.

CEO, CityWorks Management LLC
DOOR OF HOPE STAFF:

Megan Katerjian
Chief Executive Officer, Door of Hope
64 of 126

65 of 126

66 of 126

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE/NOT FOR SOLICITATION

YMCA of Glendale
2026 Board of Directors (REV3/02/26)

RYAN BUSSJAEGER Manager
Star Ford Lincoln
1101 S. Brand Blvd.

Glendale, CA 91204
Phone: (818) 956-0977 x1136
Cell: (818) 720-5899
e-mail: [email protected]
COMMITTEE: Strategic Planning

MARISOL ESPINOZA Public Affairs Manager
SoCalGas Company
919 S. Central Avenue, Unit B
Glendale, CA 91204
Phone/Cell: (323) 929-9487
e-mail: [email protected]
COMMITTEE: Resource & Community Development

EDITH M. FUENTES 3836 Los Olivos Lane
(Retired) Glendale, CA 91214
City of Glendale, Planning & Cell: (818) 736-1911
Zoning Administrator e-mail: [email protected]
COMMITTEE: Vice Chair, Executive, Finance & Facilities, Strategic Planning Chair

JOY GARCIA Senior Vice President, Relationship Manager Tri Counties Bank – Pasadena Business Center
199 S. Los Robles Avenue, Suite 820
Pasadena, CA 91101
Phone: (626) 775-6364
Cell: (818) 468-3475
e-mail: [email protected]
e-mail: [email protected]
COMMITTEE: Executive, Treasurer, Finance & Facilities
Chair

LUCIA HAZRIAN Vice President & Sr. Relationship Manager Citizens Business Bank
2800 N. Hollywood Way
Burbank, CA 91505
Phone: (818) 549-7222
Cell: (818) 480-1494
email: [email protected]
COMMITTEE: Finance & Facilities

67 of 126

YMCA of Glendale
2026 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Page 2

JEFFREY HEINTZ Partner
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
350 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 5000
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Cell: (626) 808-5474
e-mail: [email protected]
COMMITTEE: Finance & Facilities

DANA KALEK Owner
Child Development Institute
18050 Vanowen Street
Reseda, CA 91335
Phone: (818) 888-4559
Cell: (818) 720-2295
e-mail: [email protected]
COMMITTEE: Strategic Planning

ARA KALFAYAN Owner
Phoenicia Restaurant
343 N. Central Avenue
Glendale, CA 91203
Phone: (818) 956-7800
Cell: (310) 488-8780
e-mail: [email protected]
COMMITTEE: Finance & Facilities, Governance

TAMAR KEVONIAN 640 Milford Street
Glendale, CA 91203
Cell: (818) 425-1284
e-mail: [email protected]
COMMITTEE: Strategic Planning

ELIZABETH MANASSERIAN Boardwalk Properties & Investments – Commercial R/E Broker 225 E. Broadway Avenue, Suite 204
Glendale, CA 91205
Phone: (818) 635-6357 Fax: (818) 241-9612
e-mail: [email protected]
COMMITTEE: Board Chair, Executive Chair, Resource &
Community Development

CASSIE MCCARTY Director of Mission Integration & Spiritual Care Services Glendale Memorial Hospital
1420 S. Central Avenue
Glendale, CA 91204
Phone: (626) 676-0116
e-mail: [email protected]
COMMITTEE: Resource & Community Development

68 of 126

YMCA of Glendale
2026 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Page 3

AVO NALBANDIAN Attorney at Law
Law Offices of Avedis Nalbandian
701 N. Brand Blvd., Suite 840
Glendale, CA 91203
Phone: (818) 244-9000
e-mail: [email protected]
COMMITTEE: Governance

MICHAEL NEEDHAM Director of Content
Dot818
550 N. Brand Blvd., 20th Floor
Glendale, CA 91203
Phone: (818) 844-3907
e-mail: [email protected]
COMMITTEE: Strategic Planning

TIGRAN TOPADZHIKYAN Glendale Police Department - Lieutenant 131 N. Isabel Street
Glendale, CA 91206
Phone: (818) 548-3116 Fax: (818) 550-6550
Cell: (818) 606-8466
e-mail: [email protected]
COMMITTEE: Executive, Board Secretary,
Governance Chair

EDDIE TUFENKJIAN Director of Sales
Athens Services
14048 E. Valley Blvd.

City of Industry, CA 91746
Cell: (626) 764-3460
e-mail: [email protected]
COMMITTEE: Strategic Planning

NORA YACOUBIAN 10040 Toluca Lake Avenue
(Retired) Toluca Lake, CA 91602
Cell: (818) 631-9999
e-mail: [email protected]
COMMITTEE: Resource & Community Development Chair

69 of 126

70 of 126

71 of 126

72 of 126

73 of 126

City of Glendale

Contractor(s)*:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / Executive Director
Chief Operating Officer/Deputy Director
Chief Financial Officer/Fiscal Director
Board of Directors/Board President
More than 10% interest owner
*“Contractor” is the person, entity, or organization that is the party, or prospective party, to the contract with the City, EDD, or HA or any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Direct ors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operat ing Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entit y, or organization, and any campaign committee that is o wned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address. awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.
contract
Southern California Housing Rights Center
3255 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1150, Los Angeles, CA 90010
n/a
Chancela Al-Mansour
3255 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1150
Los Angeles
CA
90010
Javier Beltran
3255 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1150
Los Angeles
CA
90010
Danilo Batalla
3255 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1150
Los Angeles
CA
90010
Dennis Perez
Please see enclosed list
Los Angeles
CA
90010
n/a
Docusign Envelope ID: 2EFB054C-9B1D-8057-8013-7A45BE1DB1D6 74 of 126

Board of Directors as of March 2026
All terms expire 6/30/26
Board members are not owners, and neither are they paid

Dennis Perez, President

Hochman, Salkin,Toscher & Perez, P.C.
9100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 900W
Beverly Hills, CA 90212-3414
Attorney
(310) 281-3200
[email protected]

Alisa Schlesinger, Vice
President

Walt Disney Pictures
500 S. Buena Vista St.

Burbank, CA 91521
Attorney
(818) 306-7252
[email protected]

Robert Kitson, Secretary

Myers Law Group
6464 Sunset Blvd., Ste. 1070
Hollywood, CA 90028
Attorney
Direct: (213) 281-9114
Main: (909) 919-2027 ext. 1014
[email protected]

Robert K. Johnson,
Treasurer

Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
350 S. Grand Avenue, 50th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Attorney
(213) 683-9109
(213) 683-5109 Fax
[email protected]

Sofia Aguilar

NBC/Universal
100 Universal City Plaza
Building 1440, Suite 1600
Universal City, CA 91608
Attorney
(818) 840-4444
[email protected]

Aaron Bloom

TroyGould PC
1801 Century Park East, Ste. 1600
Los Angeles, CA 90067-2367
Attorney
(310) 789-1222
(310) 789-1422 Fax
[email protected]
Grant Habata
Law Office of Grant M. Habata
2118 Wilshire Boulevard, #353
Santa Monica, CA 90403
Attorney
(310) 866-2600
(310) 228-3123
[email protected]

Audrey M. Harris

Yoga Instructor
1517 Westholme Ave
Los Angeles, CA 90024
(310) 474-0326
[email protected]

Aaron M. May

Halpern May Ybarra Gelberg LLP
550 S. Hope Street, Suite 2330
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Attorney
Main: (213) 402-1900
Direct: (213) 402-1920
[email protected]

Alexander K. Robinson

Robinson Zermay LLP
777 S. Alameda St., 2nd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90021

Attorney
[email protected]

Kenneth Trujillo-Jamison

Willenken LLP
707 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 3850
Los Angeles, CA 90017

Attorney
(213) 955-8031
(310) 252-4067
[email protected]
Cory M. Batza

Halpern May Ybarra Gelberg LLP
550 S. Hope Street, Suite 2330
Los Angeles, CA 90071

Attorney
(661) 916-1642
[email protected]
Meredith Esarey

MRK Partners, Inc.
5230 Pacific Concourse Drive, Suite 350
Los Angeles, CA 90045

LIH-Developer
(310) 720-4158
[email protected]

Advisory Board

Marjie Mautner
Retired
3715 Valley Meadow Rd.

Encino, CA 91436
(818) 986-3356
(818) 986-3357 fax
[email protected]

Docusign Envelope ID: 2EFB054C-9B1D-8057-8013-7A45BE1DB1D6 75 of 126

Rev. 6/7/12 J:\FILES\DOCFILES\ORD\CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION\DISCLOSURE FORM – CONTRACTOR – 6-7-12.doc Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or gener al or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contrac tor. Subcontractor includes any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financ ial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional ― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclo sure; The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and I have been legally authorized to su bmit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:
3 26
Chancela Al-Mansour
3255 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1150, Los Angeles, CA 90010 (213) 387-8400 x1111
[email protected]
Docusign Envelope ID: 2EFB054C-9B1D-8057-8013-7A45BE1DB1D6 4/30/2026
Los Angeles, CA
76 of 126

77 of 126

78 of 126

City of Glendale

A contractor must provide the information listed below when: A subcontractor must provide the information listed below when:
•The City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $50,000 or more; or • The subcontract through a City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $25,000 or more; or
• A combination or series of City Contracts have a value of $50,000 or more. • A combination or series of subcontract s, for the same or different projects, have an aggregate value of $25,000 or
more. Information that must be disclosed: ● Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) ● Name of the Chief Executive Officer/Pre
siden t
● Chief Operating Officer
● Chief Financial Officer
● Chairper
son
● All members of the Board of Directors
● All persons who own more than 10% of the perso
n, entity, or organi zation
● Name of any campaign committee owned or controll ed by the person, entity, or organization Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Rev. 6/7/12 J:\FILES\DOCFILES\ORD\CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION\DISCLOSURE FORM – CONTRACTOR – 6-7-12.doc Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or gener al or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contrac tor. Subcontractor includes any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financ ial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional ― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclo sure; The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and I have been legally authorized to su bmit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:
80 of 126

81 of 126

82 of 126

83 of 126

City of Glendale

A contractor must provide the information listed below when: A subcontractor must provide the information listed below when:
•The City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $50,000 or more; or • The subcontract through a City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $25,000 or more; or
• A combination or series of City Contracts have a value of $50,000 or more. • A combination or series of subcontract s, for the same or different projects, have an aggregate value of $25,000 or
more. Information that must be disclosed: ● Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) ● Name of the Chief Executive Officer/Pre
siden t
● Chief Operating Officer
● Chief Financial Officer
● Chairper
son
● All members of the Board of Directors
● All persons who own more than 10% of the perso
n, entity, or organi zation
● Name of any campaign committee owned or controll ed by the person, entity, or organization Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Rev. 6/7/12 J:\FILES\DOCFILES\ORD\CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION\DISCLOSURE FORM – CONTRACTOR – 6-7-12.doc Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or gener al or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contrac tor. Subcontractor includes any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financ ial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional ― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclo sure; The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and I have been legally authorized to su bmit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:
85 of 126

Ascencia Board of Directors 2025-26

OFFICERS AND COMMITTEE CHAIRS
Paulette Ramsay Wood, President
Retired, Legal Department, Contracts
Schindler Elevator Corporation
Saad Panja, Audit Committee Chair
Director, Hutchinson & Bloodgood, LLP
David Bolstad, President Elect, Vice President &
Governance Committee Chair
Esq., Bolstad Law Group
Deacon Ron Baker, Development Committee Chair
Director of Operations & Ministries, Holy Family
Catholic Church
Jane Winter, Secretary
Director Case Management, Providence St. Joseph
Medical Center
Arbella Azizian, Nominations Committee Chair
Attorney, Arbella Azizian Law
Tes Baradas, Treasurer/Finance Committee Chair
Partner, Lucas Horsfall

MEMBERS
Marvel Ford
Senior Vice President, Risk Management, California
Credit Union
Sue Son
Partner, CPA, Karis Accounting Inc.

Barbara Perrier
Vice Chairman, Industrial (CBRE)
Samona Caldwell
Director, Business Connect L.A. Sports and
Entertainment Commission
Ron Scott
Retired – Employee Relations & Benefits Manager,
Black Angus Steakhouse, current SHRM-SCP
Sara Catania
President, Solutions Journalism Network

Terry Walker
Director Neurosciences & Community Engagement
Providence Saint Joseph Medical Center
Sandeep Khera
Executive Coach & Peer Advisory Group Chair
Vistage Worldwide & Tiger 21.

Kylee Lolla
Owner, The Kleenup Woman, LLC
Kadence King
Benefits Navigator & Peer Support Specialist

CACUP SSG
Stephanie Nelson
Partner & Chief Operating Officer, The Accountancy
Emma Standring-Trueblood
Director Major Gifts, Adventist Health Glendale
Foundation
Cheryl Getuiza Christensen
Communications Manager/Community Liaison
Officer, Glendale Fire Department
*Emeritus, Nicholas Lam
Retired Vice President, Pacific BMW and Bidamar
Corporation

86 of 126

City of Glendale

A contractor must provide the information listed below when: A subcontractor must provide the information listed below when:
•The City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $50,000 or more; or • The subcontract through a City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $25,000 or more; or
• A combination or series of City Contracts have a value of $50,000 or more. • A combination or series of subcontract s, for the same or different projects, have an aggregate value of $25,000 or
more. Information that must be disclosed: ● Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) ● Name of the Chief Executive Officer/Pre
siden t
● Chief Operating Officer
● Chief Financial Officer
● Chairper
son
● All members of the Board of Directors
● All persons who own more than 10% of the perso
n, entity, or organi zation
● Name of any campaign committee owned or controll ed by the person, entity, or organization Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Rev. 6/7/12 J:\FILES\DOCFILES\ORD\CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION\DISCLOSURE FORM – CONTRACTOR – 6-7-12.doc Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or gener al or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contrac tor. Subcontractor includes any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financ ial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional ― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclo sure; The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and I have been legally authorized to su bmit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:
88 of 126

Y e a r s o f I m p a c t
Y e a r s o f I m p a c t
Board of Directors 2025–2026
YWCA Glendale and Pasadena
Board President
Wesley Walton
Chief Executive Officer
Glendale Area Schools Credit Union
1800 Broadview Dr, Glendale, CA 91208
Treasurer/VP of External Affairs Committee
Amanda Faissal
Deputy Communications Director
Assemblymember Nick Schultz’s
44th District
300 East Magnolia Boulevard, Suite 504,
Burbank, CA 91502
Secretary/VP of Governance Committee
Jess Skylar
Founding Partner
The Helia Collective (no physical work
address)

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE BOARD MEMBERS
Y W C A G l e n d a l e a n d P a s a d e n a
7 3 5 E a s t L e x i n g t o n D r i v e
G l e n d a l e , C A 9 1 2 0 6
P 8 1 8 . 2 4 2 . 4 1 5 5 F 8 1 8 . 2 4 0 . 6 0 3 6 y w c a g p . o r g
Debbie Hinckley
Retired Educator
Community Volunteer
Maggie Lee
SVP Director of Commercial Banking
East West Bank
135 N. Los Robles Ave. 7th Floor Pasadena, CA 91101
San San Lee
Attorney
Law Office of San San Lee, Inc.
7111 Santa Monica Blvd., Ste B #507
West Hollywood, CA 90046
Dalia V. Lomeli
Vice President Marketing and Public Relations
Inter-Con Security
210 S De Lacey Ave, Pasadena, CA 91105
Taline Saad
Executive Vice President
Opulent Remodeling & Construction
3800 La Crescenta Ave Unit 201, La Crescenta-Montrose, CA 91214
Dr. Paula Raymond Stamp
CEO/Principal
Geaux Consulting Group (no physical work address)
Lisa Watson
Principal Consultant
Watson Consulting Group (no physical work address)
89 of 126

90 of 126

91 of 126

92 of 126

93 of 126

City of Glendale

A contractor must provide the information listed below when: A subcontractor must provide the information listed below when:
•The City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $50,000 or more; or • The subcontract through a City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $25,000 or more; or
• A combination or series of City Contracts have a value of $50,000 or more. • A combination or series of subcontract s, for the same or different projects, have an aggregate value of $25,000 or
more. Information that must be disclosed: ● Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) ● Name of the Chief Executive Officer/Pre
siden t
● Chief Operating Officer
● Chief Financial Officer
● Chairper
son
● All members of the Board of Directors
● All persons who own more than 10% of the perso
n, entity, or organi zation
● Name of any campaign committee owned or controll ed by the person, entity, or organization Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Rev. 6/7/12 J:\FILES\DOCFILES\ORD\CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION\DISCLOSURE FORM – CONTRACTOR – 6-7-12.doc Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or gener al or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contrac tor. Subcontractor includes any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financ ial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional ― architec ts, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclosure; The information in this disclosure f
orm (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and I have been legally authorized to submit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:
95 of 126

ATTACHMENT A Armenian Bar Association Board of Governors / Board of Directors Officers: • Taline Sahakian — Chair • Mariam Kuregyan — Co-Vice Chair • Steven Dadaian — Co-Vice Chair • Zaven Sargsian — Secretary • Mesrop Khoudagoulian — Treasurer • Lucy Varpetian — Chair Ex-Officio Board Members: • Hon. Amy Ashvanian • Alex Hrag Bastian • Giselle Davidian • Harry H. Dikranian • Levon Golendukhin • Grant Hanessian • Armen K. Hovannisian • Souren Israelyan • Hon. Sharon Kalemkiarian • Ovsanna Takvoryan • Sarah Leah Whitson • Diana Gazaryan (NALSA Representative) 96 of 126

City of Glendale

A contractor must provide the information listed below when: A subcontractor must provide the information listed below when:
•The City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $50,000 or more; or • The subcontract through a City Contract has a total anticipated or actual value of $25,000 or more; or
• A combination or series of City Contracts have a value of $50,000 or more. • A combination or series of subcontract s, for the same or different projects, have an aggregate value of $25,000 or
more. Information that must be disclosed: ● Name of the person, entity, or organization (i.e., the Contractor or Subcontractor) ● Name of the Chief Executiv
e Officer/Preside nt
● Chief Operating Officer
● Chief Financial Officer
● Chairpe
rson
● All members of the Board of Directors
● All persons
who own more than 10% of the person, entity, or orga nization ● Name of any campaign committee own ed or controlled by the person, entity, or organization Please complete the following disclosure form:

Contractor(s)*:

Armenian Relief Society of Western USA, Inc., Social Services 517 W. Glenoaks Blvd., Glendale, CA 91202 Silva Poladian 517 W. Glenoaks Blvd. Glendale CA 91202 Talar Aintablian 517 W. Glenoaks Blvd. Glendale CA 91202 Maral Touloumian (Board Secretary) 517 W. Glenoaks Blvd. Glendale CA 91202 (Director of Operations)
97 of 126

Rev. 6/7/12 J:\FILES\DOCFILES\ORD\CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION\DISCLOSURE FORM – CONTRACTOR – 6-7-12.doc Subcontractor(s)**:

Name Address
Full Name Title Business Address City State Zip
Chairperson
Chief Executive Officer / President
Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Board of Directors
More than 10% interest owner
** “Subcontractor” is the person, entity, or organization that has entered into a contract for the performance of all or a portion of the work undertaken under an agreement with an architect, design professional, engineer, or gener al or prime contract, usually by a general or prime contrac tor. Subcontractor includes any member of that person’s, entity’s, or organization’s Board of Directors, its Chairperson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financ ial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, any person with an ownership interest of more than ten percent (10%) in that person, entity, or organization, and any campaign committee that is owned or controlled by that person, entity, or organization. Above please disclose these persons’ name and business address.

Campaign Committee owned or controlled by:

Title Business Address City State Zip

CERTIFICATION
On behalf of the above-named Contractor Subcontractor:
• I acknowledge that I have a continuing obligation to update this disclosure form if I substitute― or if I select additional ― architects, design professionals, contractors, or subcontractors within ten (10) days of the selection or change; and • I hereby certify that:
I have identified all persons for which the Ordinance requires disclo sure; The information in this disclosure form (and any attachment to this form) is true, accurate, correct, and complete; and I have been legally authorized to su bmit this disclosure form.

In total, this disclosure form (including attachments) is pages.

Executed on: , 20 , at: , California.

Signature: Print Full Name:

Address:

Phone Number: E-mail Address:

N/A
N/A
3 April 30 19 Glendale Talar Aintablian
517 W. Glenoaks Blvd., Glendale, CA 91202
(818) 241-7533 x101 [email protected]
98 of 126

ՀԱՅ ՕԳՆՈՒԹԵԱՆ ՄԻՈՒԹԵԱՆ
ԱՐԵՒՄՏԵԱՆ ՄԻԱՑԵԱԼ ՆԱՀԱՆԳՆԵՐՈՒ
ԸՆԿԵՐԱՅԻՆ ԾԱՌԱՅՈՒԹԵԱՆ ԳՐԱՍԵՆԵԱԿ

ARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY
OF WESTERN USA, INC.

SOCIAL SERVICES
ARS Regional Executive Board
2024-2026
• Christina Amirian Khanjian, Chairperson
• Vicky Marashlian, Vice Chairperson
• Rita Hintlian, Corresponding Secretary
• Eugenie Shamlian Aroyan, Recording Secretary
• Maral Kouyoumdjian Manokian,Treasurer
• Haigo Ovayan Barsamian, Advisor
• Kenarig Avedisian, Advisor
• Siroun Bedirian, Advisor
• Taline Kayayan, Advisor

*ARS Board Members are members of the Armenian Relief Society of Western USA, as well as other community organizations.
99 of 126

Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) Fiscal Year 2025‐2027
Glendale Continuum of Care (CA‐612)
Organizations Estimated
$58,500 OUTREACH/

SHELTER

PREVENTION/
RAPID

REHOUSING

ADMIN TOTAL
$86,898 City of Glendale
Administration
$6,319.00 $6,319.00 Motion:
$3,406
Home Again LA
ESG Rapid Rehousing
for Unsheltered Families
$0.00 $51,365.00 $0.00 $51,365.00 Motion by:

City (recipient) $6,319 Ascencia
Emergency Housing Program $32,000.00 $0.00 $1,703.00 $33,703.00 2nd by:
$155,123
Catholic Charities of Los
Angeles
Loaves & Fishes Homeless
Prevention Program
$0.00 $35,533.00 $1,703.00 $37,236.00 Date/Time:

YWCA of Glendale &
Pasadena
Sunrise Village Emergency
Shelter
$26,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $26,500.00
TOTAL: $58,500.00 $86,898.00 $9,725.00 $155,123.00
TOTAL AVAILABLE:* $58,500.00 $86,898.00 $9,725.00 $155,123.00 Difference (should be $0): $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Administration
Nonprofits
(subrecipients)
Approve funding
recommendation
Budget
Street Outreach
and/or
Emergency Shelter
Homeless Prevention
and/or
Rapid Rehousing
Administration
BOARD DECISION
Agency & Project
MOTION
Brooks
Younessian
2/26/2025
11:40:00 AM
Exhibit 6
100 of 126

Shelter Services Costs
Shelter Operations
Essential Services
Homeless
Pr
evention/Rapid Re-
hous
ing HMIS Admin Tota l
MUNIS PROGRAM CODES 1237 1238 1240

IDIS PROGRAM CODES
Loaves & Fishes Homeless Prevention -$ 35,533.00$ 1, 703.00$ 37, 236.00$ Catholic Charities of Los Angeles. Inc., -$
-$
Domestic Violence Housing & Emergency Shelter Program 26,500.00$ 26,500.00$ YWCA of Glendale -$
-$
Emergency Housing Program 32,000.00$ -$ 1, 703.00$ 33, 703.00$ Ascencia -$
-$
ESG Rapid Rehousing for Unsheltered Families 51,365.00$ 51,365.00$ Home Again Los Angeles -$
-$
HMIS -City of Glendale -$
-$
ESG Administration-City of Glendale -$ -$ 4, 019.00$ 4, 019.00$ -$
-$

TOTAL PROPOSED
FUNDING 58,500.00$ 86,898.00$ -$ 7, 425.00$ 152, 823.00$ FY26-27 Allocation 152,823.00$
MAX % ALLOCATION 38% 57% 5% 100%
ESG 2026-2027
July 1, 2026 -June 30, 2027
Exhibit 7
101 of 126

Proposed Final
CDBG, ESG, and HOME
FY 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan
June 2, 2026
2 102 of 126

FY 2026-2027 Total HUD Entitlement Funding
HUD Program Current
FY 2025-2026
Entitlement
Upcoming
FY 2026-2027
Entitlement
% Increase/ Decrease
Compared to
FY 2025-2026
Community Development Block Grant
Entitlement (CDBG) $1,738,811 $1,730,936 - 0.45%
Emergency Solutions Grant Entitlement (ESG) $152,328 $152,823 +0.33% HOME Partnership Entitlement (HOME) *includes
$130,000 in Program Income *$1,375,429.65 *$1,326,822 - 3.53% TOTAL $3,266,568.65 $3,210,581 -1.71%
2 2
103 of 126

FY 2026-2027 CDBG Funding Allocation Plan
CDBG Funding Categories FY 2026-2027
Final HUD Entitlement
Public Social Services (15%) $259,640
Capital Improvement Projects (65%) $1,125,109
Program Administration (20%) $346,187
Total CDBG Entitlement $1,730,936
3 3
104 of 126

FY 2026-2027 CDBG Public Social Services
Funding Recommendations
• 14 community agencies submitted proposals
for funding in ZoomGrants
• 1 Agency withdrew from consideration prior
to proposal review
• 1 Agency withdrew before Committee
Deliberations
• 2 Agencies were not recommended for
funding (Ascencia and Verdugo Hills Council,
Scouting America)
• 10 Agencies were recommended for funding.

Types of Public Social Service
Programs Funded

39% Adult/Senior Counseling and
Case Management
37% Homeless Services Programs
24% Youth Programs: In-school
programs, enrichment programs,
afterschool, youth employment,
and teen programming.
4 4
105 of 126

Public Social Services
Community Agency Funding Recommendations
AGENCY PROGRAM FY 2026-2027
Requested
Funding
FY 2026-2027
Recommended
Funding Based on
Final HUD Allocation
Difference
Armenian Engineers & Scientists of America AESA STEM Academy $29,150 $10,520 - $18,630 Armenian Bar Association Pro Bono Legal Clinic $54,676 $25,515 - $29,161 Armenian Relief Society of Western USA Community Outreach Program $143,489 $65,515 - $77,974 Ascencia Ascencia Mental Health $20,000 $0 - $20,000
Catholic Charities of Los Angeles Loaves & Fishes Program $61,478 $30,515 - $30,963 Committee for Armenian Students in Public
Schools
Intervention/Prevention Clinical Group Counseling Program $67,985 $35,515 - $32,470 Door of Hope Transitional Housing DV Mental Health & Case Mgt Program $60,842 $20,515 - $40,327 Glendale Youth Alliance Youth Employment Program $50,000 $15,515 - $34,485 Home Again Los Angeles Crisis Aid for Homeless Families $50,000 $15,515 - $34,485 Housing Rights Center Fair Housing Program $10,000 $10,000 $0 Kid’s Community Clinic of Burbank Dental Treatments & Education for Low Income Children $0 $0 $0 Verdugo Hills Council, Scouting America Scoutreach South Glendale $60,000 $0 - $60,000 YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena Mental Health Services for Survivors of Domestic Violence $60,000 $30,515 - $29,485 Total $667,620 $259,640 - $407,980
5 5
106 of 126

FY 2026-2027 CDBG Capital Improvement Project
Funding Recommendations
• 4 community agencies submitted proposals for funding in ZoomGrants • All 4 Agencies were recommended for funding
• 3 Agencies received reduced funding
• Armenian Society of Los Angeles Solar Panel Project
• Kid’s Community Clinic of Burbank, Expansion of Dental Treatment for LI Children • Verdugo Hills Council Scouting America, Gate and Stairs Project • 1 Agency was fully funded
• YMCA of Glendale, YMCA Residence Building Plumbing and Hot Water Systems Project
6 6
107 of 126

Capital Improvement Project Community Agency
Funding Recommendations
PROJECT FY 2026-2027

REQUESTED

FUNDING
FY 2026-2027

RECOMMENDATION

BASED ON EST

FUNDING
FY 2026-2027

RECOMMENDED

FUNDING BASED ON

FINAL HUD ALLOCATION

DIFFERENCE
Armenian Society of Los Angeles
Armenian Society of Los Angeles Solar Panel Project
$350,000 $200,000 $206,703 - $143,297
YMCA of Glendale
YMCA Residence Building Plumbing & Hot Water
Systems Project
$59,989 $60,000 $60,000 + $11.00
Kid’s Community Clinic of Burbank
Expansion of Dental Treatments for Low Income
Children
$800,000 $645,000 $651,703 - $148,297
Verdugo Hills Council, Scouting America
Gate and Stairs Project
$250,000 $200,000 $206,703 - $43,297
Total $1,459,989 $1,105,000 $1,125,109 - $334,880
7 7
108 of 126

ESG Program
FY 2026- 2027 Annual Action Plan
o ESG program follows the CDBG program timeline.
o ESG Funding Plan is a two-year plan:
o Funding recommendations are reviewed/approved by CoC Board o Programs MUST meet outcomes/performance measures to be renewed for funding for the subsequent year;
o November 18, 2024, RFP was issued to community agencies. o February 26, 2025, CoC Board approved funding recommendations for FY2025- 2026
o Projects that meet performance goals may be considered for renewal in FY 2026- 2027
8 8
109 of 126

FY 2026-2027 ESG Funding Allocation Plan
ESG Program FY 2025-2026 FY 2026-2027
Increase/ (Decrease)
Compared to
FY 2025-2026
Catholic Charities of Los Angeles, Inc
Loaves & Fishes Homeless Prevention Program $35,533 $37,236 + $1,703 YWCA of Glendale and Pasadena
Domestic Violence and Emergency Shelter Program
(Rapid Rehousing)
$26,500 $26,500 $0
Ascencia
Emergency Housing Program $32,000 $33,703 + $1,703
Home Again Los Angeles
Rapid Rehousing Program $51,365 $51,365 $0
City of Glendale
HMIS $0 $0 $0
City of Glendale/Community Agency
Administration $6,930 $4,019 - $2,911
Total ESG Allocation $152,328 $152,823 + $495
9 9
110 of 126

FY 2026- 2027 HOME Program Funding
Annual Action Plan
• FY 2026-2027 funding allocation and program income totaling $1,326,822 will be allocated to future HOME projects to develop affordable housing projects and program.
• Accumulated HOME fund balance from prior fiscal years will be available for rental development, Community Housing Development Organizations, and Tenant Based Rental Assistance programs. 10 10
111 of 126

#MyGlendale
11 112 of 126

3 26-90132

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA
REPORT TO THE JOINT MEETING: GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL AND

GLENDALE HOUSING AUTHORITY

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Reprogramming of 2020-2021 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Undesignated Fund Balance of $57,967 to City’s Capital Improvement Project for Elk Mini Park Playground Replacement Project.

1. City Council Motion to (1) reprogram $57,967 in CDBG undesignated fund balance from Program Year 2020–2021 to the Elk Mini Park Playground Replacement Project; (2) authorize the City Manager, or a designee, to execute all agreements, amendments, certifications, and documents necessary to program the funds; (3) authorize submission to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) of a substantial amendment to CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plans for program years 2020-2021 and 2025-2026; and (4) authorize the City Manager, or a designee, to redirect excess, cancelled, or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval.

2. Housing Authority Motion to approve a substantial amendment to CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plans for program years 2020-2021 and 2025-2026; authorize submission of the substantial amendments to the Annual Action Plans to HUD; and authorize the City Manager, or a designee, to redirect excess, cancelled, or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval.

3. Resolution of Appropriation to reprogram CDBG undesignated fund balance in the amount of $57,967 from program year 2020-2021 to Elk Mini Park Playground Replacement Project.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for June 2, 2026 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Elk Mini Park Playground Replacement Project was fully funded with CDBG funding in the amount of $400,000 in program year 2025-2026. Staff is proposing to shift $57,967 from the 2020-2021 undesignated fund balance to Elk Mini Park Playground Replacement Project, which will bring the project total to $457,967. The goal is to install a new drinking 113 of 126

32 26-90132
6 8
5 3
fountain, benches, tables, trash receptacles, bike racks, a communication board and landscaping at the perimeter of the park.

Any remaining 2020-2021 CDBG program funds must be spent down before a federally mandated September 30, 2027, due date, or they will be reclaimed by the U.S. Treasury.

The original Elk Mini Park Playground Replacement Project is anticipated to be completed in Summer 2026, with any additional work, if approved, completed in Fall 2026, to ensure that funding will not be jeopardized.

Because the CDBG Advisory Committee does not reconvene for a meeting until late August 2026, staff is bringing the request directly to the City Council and Housing Authority for approval, as the project has already started construction and staff seeks to complete both phases by Fall 2026.

Staff is requesting that City Council/Housing Authority approve the proposed substantial amendment for CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plans for program years 2020- 2021 and 2025-2026, which includes reprogramming funds as proposed above for submission to HUD for final approval.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve a:

1. Motion to (1) reprogram CDBG undesignated fund balance from program year 2020-2021 in the amount of $57,967 to Elk Mini Park Playground Replacement Project; (2) authorize the City Manager, or a designee, to execute all agreements, amendments, certifications, and documents necessary to program the funds; (3) authorize submission to HUD of a substantial amendment to CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plans for program years 2020-2021 and 2025-2026; (4) authorize submission of the substantial amendments to the Annual Action Plans to HUD; and authorize the City Manager to redirect excess, cancelled, or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval.

2. Resolution of Appropriation to reprogram CDBG undesignated fund balance in the amount of $57,967 from 2020-2021 to Elk Mini Park Playground Replacement Project.

That the Housing Authority approve a:

1. Motion to approve a substantial amendment to CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plans for program years 2020-2021 and 2025-2026; authorize submission of the substantial amendments to the Annual Action Plans to HUD; and authorize the City Manager to redirect excess, cancelled, or unused program funds under $50,000 from one project to another with CDBG Advisory Committee approval.

ANALYSIS
114 of 126

33 26-90132
6 8
5 3
On June 24, 2025, City Council and the Housing Authority approved the 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan for CDBG, ESG, and HOME programs. As part of the plan, the Elk Mini Park Playground Replacement Project, a City CIP project, was funded $400,000.

The Elk Mini Park Playground Replacement Project began construction on May 11, 2026.

Phase I scope of work includes:
Removal of the existing playground sign and installation of a new playground sign Removal of existing playground and installation of a new Game Time playground Landscape improvements at the entrance planters and along the park edges Painting of the existing playground fence
Inclusion of services during demolition, if unforeseen issues arise Replacement of the existing engineered wood fiber with poured-in-place rubberized surfacing, making the entire play area completely accessible Removal of the existing concrete ramp since it will no longer be needed with new surfacing, and
Adding new integrated shade canopies to improve comfort and usability.

The park can benefit from additional work, which was originally planned as Phase II, including:
Installation of a new drinking fountain
Installation of new benches
Addition of new tables
Installation of new trash receptacles
Addition of new bike racks
Installation of a new communication board; and
Additional landscaping at perimeter of the park.

There is CDBG funding available from Program Year 2020-2021 to expand the scope now and include Phase II as part of the current project to spend down CDBG funds.

CDBG funding from Program Year 2020-2021 has an undesignated fund balance of $57,967 that must be expended before September 30, 2027, in accordance with federal guidelines. Undesignated fund balance is comprised of funds remaining from canceled or completed programs/projects assigned to a program year, as well as unexpended program administration allocations remaining after closeout of Program Year 2020–2021.

In addition, staff is requesting that City Council/Housing Authority approve the proposed substantial amendment for CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plans for program years 2020-2021 and 2025-2026, which include reprogramming funds as proposed above, for submission to HUD for final approval.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
A Public Notice was published in the newspaper informing the public of the Substantial Amendment to the CDBG, ESG, and HOME Action Plans for program years 2020-2021 and 2025-2026 for a 30-day comment period before submitting the final approved Substantial Amendment Action Plans to HUD.
115 of 126

34 26-90132
6 8
5 3

FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed Substantial Amendments to the CDBG, ESG, HOME Annual Action Plans for program years 2020-2021 and 2025-2026 were not included as a part of the FY 2025- 2026 budget. Therefore, staff is requesting an appropriation of $57,967 from grant revenue to reprogram undesignated CDBG funds to the Elk Mini Park Playground Replacement Project.

The appropriation request is outlined below:

Requesting Appropriation
Amount From (Account
String)
To (Account
String)
Funding Source
$57,967 31240-2010-CSP-
0020-P0000
CSP01432BG
52100-2010-CSP-
0020-P0000
CSP01432BG
CDBG Fund
Department Cost Center Program
Community
Services & Parks
Projects

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The action being considered is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to: (1) CEQA Guidelines Section 15302, in that it consists of the replacement of existing facilities that will be located on the same site as the replaced facility and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity; (2) CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, in that it consists of the location of limited numbers of new, small facilities; and/or (3) CEQA Guidelines Section 15304, in that it consists of minor public alternations in the condition of land or vegetation that do not involve removal of healthy, mature, scenic trees. In any event, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment; thus, it is exempt from CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).)

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION

1. Do not approve the motion to reprogram $57,967 from 2020 Undesignated Fund Balance to Elk Mini Park Playground Replacement Project or the substantial amendment for program years 2020-2021 and 2025-2026, which will not allow Phase II of the project to be completed and risk recapture of undesignated funds from CDBG in the amount of $57,967.

2. Consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
116 of 126

35 26-90132
6 8
5 3
Submitted by:

Onnig Bulanikian, Director of Community Services & Parks Prepared by:

Maggie Kavarian, Community Services Manager
Tereza Aleksanian, Assistant Director of Community Services & Parks Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
None.
117 of 126

1 1
7 2
2 6
MOTION
Moved by Council Member ____________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that, with respect to the June 9, 2026, report of the directors of Community Development and Community Services & Parks, the City Council of the City of Glendale hereby:
(1) Approves the reprogramming of undesignated fund balance from Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds in the amount of $57,967, awarded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), to the Elk Mini Park Playground Project in the amount of $57,967;
(2) Authorizes the City Manager or a designee to execute all agreements, amendments, certifications, and documents necessary to carry out the reprogramming of funds; (3) Authorizes submission to HUD of a substantial amendment to the FY 2020-2021 and 2025-2026 CDBG, Emergency Solutions Grant, and HOME Investment Partnerships Act Annual Action Plans regarding the reprogramming of funds; and (4) Authorizes the City Manager, or a designee, to redirect excess, cancelled, or unused program funds under $50,000 among projects with CDBG Advisory Committee approval.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
118 of 126

1 1
7 2
2 7
MOTION
Moved by Housing Authority Member ____________________________, seconded by Housing Authority Member ___________________________, that, with respect to the June 9, 2026, staff report, the Housing Authority of the City of Glendale hereby:
(1) Approves the reprogramming of undesignated fund balance from Community Development Block Grant funds in the amount of $57,967, awarded by the U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), to the Elk Mini Park Playground Project in the amount of $57,967;
(2) Authorizes submission of the FY 2020-2021 and 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan Substantial Amendment to HUD; and
(3) Authorizes the City Manager or a designee to execute all agreements, amendments, certifications, and documents necessary to carry out the reprogramming of funds.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
119 of 126

RESOLUTIONNO.

RESOLUTIONOFTHECOUNCILOFTHECITYOFGLENDALE

MAKINGANAPPROPRIATION
BEITRESOLVEDBYTHECOUNCILOFTHECITYOFGLENDALE:

SECTION1:Thatthesumof$57,967isherebyappropriatedand/ortransferredfromthefollowing accountstothefollowingaccounts.

ACCOUNTSDESCRIPTIONFROMTO
31240-2010-CSP-0020-P0000FederalGrants,CDBGFund,Community$57,967 CSPO1432BGServices&Parks,Projects,ElkMiniPark
Project20/21
52100-2010-CSP-0020-P0000Construction,CDBGFund,Community$57,967 CSPO1432BGServices&Parks,Projects,ElkMiniPark
Project20/21
ToappropriatefundingfortheElkMiniParkPlaygroundReplacementProject.

SECTION2:TheDirectorofFinanceisauthorizedtomakesuchotherrevisions,individualappropriation line-items,changesinsummaries,fundtotals,grandtotals,andotherportionsofthebudgetdocumentas necessarytoreflectandimplementthechangesspecifiedinthisresolution.

SECTION3:TheCityClerkshallcertifytotheadoptionofthisResolution.

Adoptedthisdayof
________________,
2026.

Mayor
ATTEST:

CITYOFGLENIMLE
4çj%,DATE5/20/26

APPROVEDASTOFINANCIAL
CityClerkPROVISIONFORS57,967
‘Directoroffinance STATEOFCALIFORNIA)

COUNTYOFLOSANGELES)SS

CITYOFGLENDALE)
I,SuzieAbajian,CityClerkoftheCityofGlendale,doherebycertifythattheforegoingResolution No.wasadaptedbytheCounciloftheCityofGlendale,Califomia,ataregularmeetingheldan the__________dayof
________________,
2026,andthatthesamewasadoptedbythefollowingvote;
Ayes;
Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

CityClerk
120 of 126

FY 2020-2021 and FY 2025-2026
Annual Action Plan Substantial Amendment
for
CDBG, ESG, and HOME
to reprogram $57,967
June 2, 2026
3 121 of 126

Background
Elk Mini Park Playground Replacement Project
• Phase I- $400,000 in CDBG Program Year 2025-2026 funds • Removal of existing playground, playground sign and installation of Game Time playground and new sign • Landscape improvements at the entrance planters and along the park edges • Painting of the existing playground fence
• Replacement of the existing wood fiber with poured-in-place rubberized surfacing, making the entire play area completely accessible
• Removal of the existing concrete ramp since it will no longer be needed with new surfacing • Adding new integrated shade canopies to improve comfort and usability. • Phase II requires an additional $57,967
• Drinking fountain
• Benches
• Tables
• Trash receptables
• Bike racks
• Communication board
• Landscaping perimeter of park
• Phase I and II anticipated completion of project by late Summer 2026 2 2
122 of 126

Factors for Reprogramming CDBG Funds to Project
CDBG 7- Year Period of Performance Requirement
• FY 2020-2021 CDBG funds are at risk for recapture by U.S. Treasury by 2027. • Elk Mini Park Playground Replacement Project will be completed by late Summer 2026 to ensure funding is not jeopardized.

CDBG Timeliness Requirement
• CDBG funds must be expended in a manner that demonstrates timely progress toward project completion.
• Timely expenditure of funds ensures that federal resources are effectively deployed without unnecessary delay.

3 3
123 of 126

FY 2020-2021 Undesignated Fund Balance
Undesignated fund balance is comprised of funds remaining from canceled or completed programs/projects assigned to a program year, as well as unexpended program administration allocations remaining after closeout of Program Year 2020–2021.
4 4
124 of 126

U.S. Housing and Urban Development
Substantial Amendment
• The proposed reprogramming of funds require substantial amendments to CDBG, ESG, and HOME Annual Action Plans for FY 2020-2021 and 2025- 2026.
• Requesting City Council and Housing Authority to approve the staff recommendations and submit the substantial amendments to HUD. 5 5
125 of 126

#MyGlendale
6 126 of 126

Glendale City CouncilJune 9, 2026

Glendale City Council
June 9, 2026