Agenda packet, closed session — Glendale City Council, June 23, 2026 (part 1 of 3)

A G E N D A

GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor
Glendale, CA 91206
JUNE 23, 2026 - 6:00 PM
CLOSED SESSION – 3:00 PM

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND ACCESSIBILITY

PLEASE SILENCE CELLULAR PHONES WHILE INSIDE THE MEETING LOCATION Viewing of City Council Meetings
:
•
In-person – City Council Chambers, 613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor, Glendale, CA 91206 •
Live Broadcast via Glendale TV, viewable on Spectrum Cable, channel 6, and AT&T U-verse, channel 99. Meetings are also streamed on the City webpage, glendaleca.gov/live
, on
YouTube.com/myglendale
, and on the Cablecast app under "Glendale TV". Meetings are also archived on the City Website for viewing anytime at
glendaleca.gov/agendas
.

City Council meeting agenda packets, any agenda related documents, and additional documents are available at City Hall and online for public viewing on the City’s website:
https://www.glendaleca.gov/government/public-meeting-portal ADA Accessibility and Translation Services
:

compliance

with

the

Americans

with

Disabilities

Act

(ADA)

1990,

auxiliary

hearing

aids,

sign
language

translation,

and

Braille

transcripts

are

available

upon

request.

Assisted

listening

devices
are

available

same-day

upon

request.

The

City

Clerk’

office

should

notified

72 hours

(three
business

days)

soon

practicable

for

requests

regarding

sign

language

translation

and
Braille

transcription

services;

please

direct

all

accessibility

requests

(818)

548-2090.

For
translations,

please

specify

the

language

for

which

you

require

translation.

The

exclusive

use

of
City

provided

interpreters

not

required

and

persons

are

welcome

use

their

own

interpreter

or
speak in their native language.

Public participation in Council meetings may occur as follows :
•
In-person – City Council Chambers
•
T elephonic participation: Call (818) 937-8100
If you have any questions about matters on the agenda, or requests for assistance including agenda email notification, please contact the City Clerk’s Office via email at [email protected], or by phone at (818) 548-2090.

1 TYPED 6/23/2026 9:56:56 AM
06 23 26
CC

PUBLIC COMMENT GUIDELINES
The City Council welcomes public input at City Council meetings. Public input at Council meetings is regulated by the City Council’s Rules of Order, Procedure and Decorum for the Conduct of City Council Meetings as set forth in Resolution No. 25-76, which will be summarized below.

Written Comments and Documents
:

Public comments received in writing will NOT be read aloud at the meeting but will be part of the meeting record. Written public comments can be emailed to [email protected], and will be uploaded to the City website as an attachment to the agenda item. When submitting a public comment, please make sure to include the following
:

1. Name (optional); and

2. Agenda item to which you are submitting public comment

3. Submit no later than 12:00 p.m. on the day of the City Council meeting. Correspondence received after this time may not be distributed until the following business day.

All documents related to open session items on this agenda that are received less than 72 hours prior to this meeting, and are public records, will be available for review in the Office of the City Clerk, 613 E. Broadway, Room 110, Glendale, CA 91206.

Public Comments During Council Meeting
:

Public Comments during Community Event Announcements, First and Second Periods of Oral Communications and agenda items will be governed as provided in the descriptions for those items on the agenda below. Pursuant to State law, the City Council may not discuss or take action on any item not appearing on the meeting agenda, except that members of the City Council or staff may ask a question for clarification or briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons exercising public testimony rights (Government Code Section 54954.2). Staff may be asked to follow up on such items.

Submitting Speaker Cards or Calling In for Public Comment :

Speaker cards must be submitted and telephonic participants must call in and be in the call-in queue as follows:
•
Community Event Announcements or First or Second Period of Oral Communications: PRIOR TO the commencement of the specific comment period
•
Consent Calendar Items: BEFORE a motion is made on the consent calendar •
Other agenda items, including Action items: PRIOR to the completion of the verbal staff report (unless waived by the Mayor)
Any audio-visual files displayed by speakers must be emailed to the Clerk’s office by 12:00 pm on the day before a Council meeting.

2 TYPED 6/23/2026 9:56:56 AM
06 23 26
CC

JUNE 23, 2026 - 6:00 PM
CLOSED SESSION – 3:00 PM
Revised: Added 2d and 4a

ROLL CALL

1. DISCUSSION OF COUNCILMEMBER FUTURE AGENDA REQUESTS

2. CLOSED SESSION
– 1:00 PM (T o Commence at 3:00 PM
)
a.

Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation: Asadorian v. City of Glendale, L.A.S.C. No. 24NNCV03709
b.

Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation: Claim of Karine Grigoryan, Claim No. 23-0142
c.

Public Employee Appointment – Chief of Police
d.

Conference with Real Property Negotiators: City-designated negotiators: Roubik Golanian, John Takhtalian, Michael J. Garcia, Gillian van Muyden, Onnig Bulanikian and Domenica Megerdichian. Property Location: Land located near the front entrance to the Adult Recreation Center at 201 E. Colorado St. Negotiating Parties:

Filipino Business Association of Glendale – Greater Los Angeles County and Comfort Women Action for Redress and Education. Instructions to the negotiator(s) will concern the price and terms of lease of City property containing the Filipino American Friendship Monument and the Glendale Peace Monument

3. REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA
– 6:00 PM
Roll Call
a.

Flag Salute
b.

Invocation
c.

Report of the City Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the June 23, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Glendale City Council was Posted on June 17, 2026 , on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

4. PRESENTATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS
a.

Proclamation Designating June as Pride Month

City Clerk, re: Approval of the Minutes of the Special City Council Meetings of May 12, 2026, May 21, 2026, May 28, 2026, and June 4, 2026, and the City Council Meetings of May 12, 2026, May 19, 2026, and June 2, 2026 b.

Public Works, re:

Award of Construction Contract for the District 12 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Curb Ramp Installation and Sidewalk Repair Program

1. Motion awarding a construction contract to Kalban, Inc. in the amount of $2,575,317, approving a 20 percent construction reserve in the amount of $515,063, and authorizing the City Manager or a designee to execute the contract

3 TYPED 6/23/2026 9:56:56 AM
06 23 26
CC

2. Resolution of appropriation, to appropriate funds in the amount of $3,347,912 for the District 12 ADA Curb Ramp Installation and Sidewalk Repair Program c.

Public Works, re: Professional Services Agreement (PSA) for Professional Engineering Services for the Wastewater Master Plan Update and As-Needed Wastewater Consulting Services

1. Motion authorizing the City Manager or a designee to enter into and execute a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with HDR Engineering, Inc. to provide Professional Engineering Services for the Wastewater Master Plan Update and As- Needed Wastewater Consulting Services in an amount not to exceed $621,472

2. Resolution of appropriation of $115,472 from the Sewer Fund to provide adequate funding for the PSA
d.

Human Resources, re:

Professional Services Agreement with Self Insured Services Company, LLC dba Benefit Coordinators Corporation for BenXcel and Benefits Administration Services

1. Motion Authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Self Insured Services Company, LLC dba Benefit Coordinators Corporation (BCC) for BenXcel online benefits administration and related services for a five (5) year term beginning October 1, 2026, with two (2) one-year options to extend for a total of seven (7) years, with an annual not-to-exceed amount of $150,000 for Years 1- 4 and $155,000 for Year 5 and any optional extensions (subject to annual appropriation)
e.

Human Resources, re: Professional Services Agreement with Glendale Adventist Medical Center dba Adventist Health Glendale to provide occupational medical services for the City of Glendale

1. Motion Authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Glendale Adventist Medical Center dba Adventist Health Glendale to provide occupational medical services for the City of Glendale for a five (5) year term beginning November 1, 2026, with two (2) one-year options to extend for a total of seven (7) years, with an annual not-to-exceed amount of $200,000 (subject to annual appropriation)
f.

Finance, re:

Escheatment for Unclaimed Checks and Deposits

1. Motion to escheat unclaimed checks and deposits held by various City funds pursuant to Government Code Sections 50050-50057
g.

Fire Department, re: Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Service Agreement Between the City of Glendale and IQ Personnel, Inc.

1. Motion to amend the Professional Service Agreement between the City of Glendale and IQ Personnel, Inc. (8003213) for additional three-year term until June 30, 2029, thus increasing the contract amount by $189,000 to the new total not-to- exceed amount of $239,000
h.

Community Services and Parks, re:

Amendment 9 for FY 2026-27 Los Angeles
County Aging and Disabilities (AD) baseline funding for Supportive Services Program (SSP)

1. Motion to accept $66,129 in baseline funding from Los Angeles County AD for FY 2026-2027 Supportive Services Program; and authorize the City Manager or a designee to execute Amendment Nine for the SSP232404 Subaward period July 2026 – July 2027 to accept and implement funding
i.

4 TYPED 6/23/2026 9:56:56 AM
06 23 26
CC

Community Services and Parks, re: Elderly Nutrition Program Amendment No. 3 Award of Grant Funds from County of Los Angeles Aging and Disabilities Department for FY 2026-27 in the amount of $493,377

1. Motion to authorize acceptance of $493,377 in Elderly Nutrition Program (ENP) funding from Los Angeles County Aging and Disabilities (AD) for FY 2026-2027; and authorize the City Manager or a designee to execute Amendment No. 3 to Subaward ENP252604, period July 2026 – June 2027, to accept and implement the funding j.

City Attorney, re:

City Council Regular Meeting Schedule for the 2026-27 Fiscal Year

1. Motion Establishing City Council Regular Meeting Schedule for the 2026-27 Fiscal Year and Cancelling Specified City Council Meetings

6. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS
(Including reports from conferences and regional
meetings)

7. COMMUNITY EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS
(3-minutes per speaker)
Members of the public will be permitted to announce upcoming events taking place in the community.

8. FIRST PERIOD OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
(Maximum 3 minutes per speaker, 30-minute
aggregate speaking time limit)
Members of the public may address the Council on agenda items or non-agenda items within the City Council’s subject matter jurisdiction. If a speaker addresses the Council on an agenda item during the First Period of Oral Communications, they may not speak again when the agenda item is called. A speaker who addresses the Council on non-agenda items during the First Period of Oral Communications may not speak during the Second Period of Oral Communications.

9. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES
a.

Community Development, re: Adoption of an urgency ordinance, pursuant to Senate Bill 79 (SB 79, also known as “The Abundant and Affordable Homes Near Transit Act”), temporarily exempting properties located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) and/or containing a locally designated historic resource as of January 1, 2025, from the provisions of SB 79 (Gharpetian, June 9, 2026)

1. Urgency Ordinance to T emporarily Delay Effectuation of SB 79 for Certain Sites Located Within the VHFHSZ and/or Containing a Locally Designated Historic Resource

10. ACTION ITEMS
a.

Public Works, re:

Potential Regulations for Personal Delivery Devices (PDDs) Operating Within the Public Right-of-Way

1. Introduction of Urgency Ordinance enacting a moratorium on the deployment and operation of PDDs on public rights-of-way;

2. Motion providing direction regarding establishment of regulations for operation of PDDs on public right-of-way
b.

Public Works, re:

North Hollywood to Pasadena Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Project Cooperative Agreement

1. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to conclude negotiations and execute a Cooperative Agreement with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for the design and construction of the North Hollywood to

5 TYPED 6/23/2026 9:56:56 AM
06 23 26
CC

Pasadena Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Project, in substantially the form presented to the City Council, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney c.

Human Resources, re:

Side Letter Agreement Between the City and Glendale Police Officers’ Association (GPOA)

1. Motion Approving Side Letter Agreement Modifying Language in the GPOA Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) effective July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2027 to Clarify Intent of Specified Special Compensation Items
d.

Finance, re:

Adoption of the City’s FY 2026-27 Gann Appropriations Limit

1. Resolution Adopting FY 2026-27 Gann Appropriations Limit e.

Finance, re:

FY 2025-26 Glendale Water and Power Transfer

1. Resolution Reducing the Percentage of Operating Revenues to be Transferred from Glendale Water and Power (Electric) to the General Reserve Fund for Fiscal Year 2025-26

11. HEARINGS
a.

Finance, re:

FY 2026-27 Citywide Budget Hearing and Adoption
1) Hold a Public Hearing on the FY 2026-27 Proposed Citywide Budget and Changes to the Citywide Fee Schedule
2) Resolution Adopting the FY 2026-27 City of Glendale Budget 3) Resolution Establishing New Fees, and Increasing, Decreasing, Modifying Certain Existing Fees for Various Services Provided by the City and Adopting Changes to the Citywide Fee Schedule for FY 2026-27
4) Resolution Establishing New Fees, and Increasing, Decreasing, Modifying Certain Existing Fees in the Comprehensive Citywide Fee Schedule for FY 2026-27 for Community Development Services, Permits, and Certificates 5) Resolution of Appropriation Shifting $60,000,000 from Undesignated Fund Balance, Section 115 Trust Fund (25300-1080) to Cash Restricted – Section 115 Trust, Section 115 Trust Fund (10115-1080) for Deposit into the Pension Rate Stabilization Program Trust Fund Account
6) Resolution Providing for the Establishment of Classification Titles and Compensation for Employees of the City of Glendale Covered by the Glendale Management Association Memorandum of Understanding, Including Employee Relations Exempt Classifications 7) Resolution Providing for the Establishment of Classification Titles and Compensation for Employees of the City of Glendale Represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 18
8) Resolution Providing for the Establishment of Classification Titles and Compensation for Employees of the City of Glendale Covered by the Glendale City Employees’ Association Memorandum of Understanding, Including Confidential and Hourly Classifications 9) Resolution Providing for the Establishment of Classification Titles and Compensation for Employees of the City of Glendale Covered by the Glendale Fire Fighters’ Association Memorandum of Understanding
10) Resolution Providing for the Establishment of Classification Titles and Compensation for Executive Level Employees of the City of Glendale
11) Resolution Approving and Adopting Side Letter Agreements to the Memoranda of Understanding Between the City of Glendale and Various Bargaining Units Regarding Compensation, Classification Updates, and Administrative Corrections

12. REPORTS - INFORMATION

6 TYPED 6/23/2026 9:56:56 AM
06 23 26
CC

13. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

14. SECOND PERIOD OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Discussion is limited to items NOT a part of this agenda. Each speaker is allowed 5 minutes.

Council may question or respond to the speaker, but there will be no debate or decision. The City Manager may refer the matter to the appropriate department for investigation and report.

15. NEW BUSINESS

16. ADJOURNMENT

7 TYPED 6/23/2026 9:56:56 AM
06 23 26
CC

1 05 12 26 SPCC

M I N U T E S
SPECIAL MEETING: GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor
Glendale, CA 91206
MAY 12, 2026
The Special Public Meeting of the Glendale City Council convened in the City Chambers, in said City, at 4:05 PM, on the above date, pursuant to a call for such meeting signed by the City Clerk of the City Council, and on file with the City Clerk, a copy of which is as follows:

May 8, 2026
Date
Written Notice of said meeting was given, which Notice consisted of a copy of the foregoing Call, and was served on each Member of the Council not joining in the Call, and upon the in said City not less than 24 hours before the time fixed in said Call for said meeting, as follows:

Upon Elen Asatryan at 5:00 PM May 8, 2026 Glendale, CA
Upon Dan Brotman at 5:00 PM May 8, 2026 Glendale, CA
Upon Vartan Gharpetian at 5:00 PM May 8, 2026 Glendale, CA Upon Ara Najarian at 5:00 PM May 8, 2026 Glendale, CA
Upon Ardy Kassakhian at 5:00 PM May 8, 2026 Glendale, CA Mayor Kassakhian called the meeting to order at 4:05 PM.

ROLL CALL – 4:05 PM
- All Present
- Report of the City Clerk of the City Council, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the Tuesday, May 12, 2026 Special Public Meeting of the City Council was posted on May 8, 2026, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

A SPECIAL PUBLIC MEETING of the City Council is hereby called to meet at 4:00 PM on Tuesday, May 12, 2026, in the Council Chamber, 613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor, Glendale, CA 91206 to consider the following item(s) of business, to wit;

1. Community Services and Parks, re: Award of Contract for Glorietta Tennis Operations
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Michael Garcia, City Attorney
Aaron Israel, Senior Assistant City Attorney
8 of 745

2 05 12 26 SPCC
Presentation:

Onnig Bulanikian, Director, Community Services and Parks Department Gabrielle Goglia, Community Services Manager, Community Services and Parks Department
Public Speakers:

Susan Nardi
Motion:
a. Approving the award of a five-year contract for operation of the tennis courts at Glorietta Park, with the option to renew on a year-to-year basis for up to five additional years, to Vigen Khanlarian and Artak Harutyunyan, joint contractors scored highest by the Selection Committee, and authorizing the City Manager to execute the contract; and
b. Rejecting all other proposals
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Gharpetian
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Gharpetian, Kassakhian
Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: Brotman, Najarian
ADJOURNMENT – 4:53 PM
Moved: Najarian Seconded: Brotman
Mayor of the City of Glendale
City Clerk of the City of Glendale
9 of 745

1 05 21 26 SPCC

M I N U T E S
SPECIAL MEETING: GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor
Glendale, CA 91206
MAY 21, 2026
The Special Public Meeting of the Glendale City Council convened in the City Chambers, in said City, at 2:02 PM, on the above date, pursuant to a call for such meeting signed by the City Clerk of the City Council, and on file with the City Clerk, a copy of which is as follows:

May 19, 2026
Date
Written Notice of said meeting was given, which Notice consisted of a copy of the foregoing Call, and was served on each Member of the Council not joining in the Call, and upon the in said City not less than 24 hours before the time fixed in said Call for said meeting, as follows:

Upon Elen Asatryan at 5:00 PM May 19, 2026 Glendale, CA Upon Dan Brotman at 5:00 PM May 19, 2026 Glendale, CA
Upon Vartan Gharpetian at 5:00 PM May 19, 2026 Glendale, CA Upon Ara Najarian at 5:00 PM May 19, 2026 Glendale, CA
Upon Ardy Kassakhian at 5:00 PM May 19, 2026 Glendale, CA Mayor Kassakhian called the meeting to order at 2:02 PM.

ROLL CALL- 2:02 PM
- All Present (Councilmember Asatryan arrived at 2:06 PM) - Report of the City Clerk of the City Council, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the Thursday, May 21, 2026 Special Public Meeting of the City Council was posted on May 19, 2026, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

A SPECIAL PUBLIC MEETING of the City Council is hereby
called to meet at 2:00 PM on Thursday, May 21, 2026, in the Council Chamber, 613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor, Glendale, CA 91206 to consider the following item(s) of business, to wit;

1. Budget Study Session #2 – Proposed FY 2026-27 Citywide Budget and Departmental Presentations
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Michael Garcia, City Attorney
John Takhtalian, Assistant City Manager
10 of 745

2 05 21 26 SPCC
Jeff Brooks, Chief, Glendale Fire Department
Daniel Hernandez, Director, Public Works Department
Scott Mellon, General Manager, Glendale Water & Power
Onnig Bulanikian, Director, Community Services & Parks
Jason Bradford, Chief Information Officer
Dr. Suzie Abajian, City Clerk
Lessa Pelayo-Lozada, Director, Library, Arts & Culture
Presentation:

Jack Liang, Director, Finance Department
Public Comments:

Herbert Molano
Denise Meyer
Christine Alexanians
Joan Zierhut
Beth Brooks
Ejmin Hakobian
Councilmember Najarian stepped away at 2:04 PM and returned at 2:05 PM.

Councilmember Brotman stepped away at 3:05 and returned at 3:08 PM.

Councilmember Najarian stepped away at 3:42 PM and returned at 3:44 PM.

Councilmember Brotman stepped away during the presentation and returned at 4:09 PM.

2. CLOSED SESSION- Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation: Initiation of Litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9: 1 potential case City Attorney Garcia noted that Council did not anticipate reporting out on this item.

ADJOURNMENT by Consensus – 4:36 PM
Mayor of the City of Glendale
City Clerk of the City of Glendale
11 of 745

1 05 28 26 SPCC

M I N U T E S
SPECIAL MEETING: GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor
Glendale, CA 91206
MAY 28, 2026
The Special Public Meeting of the Glendale City Council convened in the City Chambers, in said City, at 2:07 PM, on the above date, pursuant to a call for such meeting signed by the City Clerk of the City Council, and on file with the City Clerk, a copy of which is as follows:

May 26, 2026
Date
Written Notice of said meeting was given, which Notice consisted of a copy of the foregoing Call, and was served on each Member of the Council not joining in the Call, and upon the in said City not less than 24 hours before the time fixed in said Call for said meeting, as follows:

Upon Elen Asatryan at 5:00 PM May 26, 2026 Glendale, CA Upon Dan Brotman at 5:00 PM May 26, 2026 Glendale, CA
Upon Vartan Gharpetian at 5:00 PM May 26, 2026 Glendale, CA Upon Ara Najarian at 5:00 PM May 26, 2026 Glendale, CA
Upon Ardy Kassakhian at 5:00 PM May 26, 2026 Glendale, CA Mayor Kassakhian called the meeting to order at 2:07 PM.

ROLL CALL - 2:07 PM
- All Present
- Report of the City Clerk of the City Council, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the Thursday, May 28, 2026 Special Public Meeting of the City Council was posted on May 26, 2026, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

A SPECIAL PUBLIC MEETING of the City Council is hereby called to meet at 2:00 PM on Thursday, May 28, 2026, in the Council Chamber, 613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor, Glendale, CA 91206 to consider the following item(s) of business, to wit;

1. Budget Study Session #3 – Proposed FY 2026-27 Capital Improvement Plan and Citywide Fee Schedule Changes; Public Hearing on City Vacancies and Recruitment and Retention Efforts (Assembly Bill 2561/Government Code Section 3502.3)
Mayor Kassakhian opened the Public Hearing at 3:47 PM and Mayor Pro 12 of 745

2 05 28 26 SPCC
Tem Gharpetian closed it at 4:05 PM.

Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Daniel Hernandez, Director, Public Works Department
Scott Mellon, General Manager, Glendale Water & Power
John Takhtalian, Assistant City Manager
Vilia Zemaitaitis, Deputy Director – Long Range Planning, Community Development Department
Tamar Sadd, Deputy Director, Community Development Department Presentation:

Jack Liang, Director, Finance Department
Linda Moossaian, Revenue Director, Finance Department
Paula Adams, Chief Human Resources Officer
Public Comments:

Herbert Molano
Ani Khash
Councilmember Najarian stepped away at 3:06 PM and returned at 3:09 PM.

Councilmember Asatryan stepped away at 3:34 PM and returned at 3:43 PM.

Councilmember Gharpetian stepped away at 3:39 PM and returned at 3:41 PM.

ADJOURNMENT – 4:05 PM
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Asatryan
Mayor of the City of Glendale
City Clerk of the City of Glendale
13 of 745

1 06 04 26 SPCC

M I N U T E S
SPECIAL MEETING: GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor
Glendale, CA 91206
JUNE 4, 2026
The Special Public Meeting of the Glendale City Council convened in the City Chambers, in said City, at 2:01 PM, on the above date, pursuant to a call for such meeting signed by the City Clerk of the City Council, and on file with the City Clerk, a copy of which is as follows:

June 2, 2026
Date
Written Notice of said meeting was given, which Notice consisted of a copy of the foregoing Call, and was served on each Member of the Council not joining in the Call, and upon the in said City not less than 24 hours before the time fixed in said Call for said meeting, as follows:

Upon Elen Asatryan at 5:00 PM June 2, 2026 Glendale, CA Upon Dan Brotman at 5:00 PM June 2, 2026 Glendale, CA
Upon Vartan Gharpetian at 5:00 PM June 2, 2026 Glendale, CA Upon Ara Najarian at 5:00 PM June 2, 2026 Glendale, CA
Upon Ardy Kassakhian at 5:00 PM June 2, 2026 Glendale, CA Mayor Kassakhian called the meeting to order at 2:01 PM.

ROLL CALL - 2:01 PM
- All Present
- Report of the City Clerk of the City Council, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the Thursday, June 4, 2026 Special Public Meeting of the City Council was posted on June 2, 2026, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

A SPECIAL PUBLIC MEETING of the City Council is hereby called to meet at 2:00 PM on Thursday, June 4, 2026, in the Council Chamber, 613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor, Glendale, CA 91206 to consider the following item(s) of business, to wit;

1. Budget Study Session #4 – Follow-Up Items from Budget Study Sessions Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Lessa Pelayo-Lozada, Director, Library, Arts & Culture
John Takhtalian, Assistant City Manager
14 of 745

2 06 04 26 SPCC
Onnig Bulanikian, Director, Community Services and Parks Department Daniel Hernandez, Director, Public Works Department
Robert William, Interim Chief, Glendale Police Department Presentation:

Jack Liang, Director, Finance Department
Karina Cervantes-Vazquez, Deputy Director, Finance Department Public Comments:

Emmanual Dominguez
Laura Dominguez
Alexa Dominguez
Robert Wagner
David Binzley
Herbert Molano
Erin Dinan
Alexandra Olin Lazar
Annalisa Wurm
Henry Fay
Alex Fay
Ani Khash
Maryanne Ruiz
Councilmember Asatryan stepped away at 3:39 PM and returned at 3:40 PM.

Mayor Kassakhian left the meeting at 3:59 PM.

ADJOURNMENT by Consensus – 4:02 PM
Mayor of the City of Glendale
City Clerk of the City of Glendale
15 of 745

1 05 12 26 CC

M I N U T E S

GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor Glendale, CA 91206
MAY 12, 2026
ROLL CALL – All Present

1. DISCUSSION OF COUNCILMEMBER FUTURE AGENDA REQUESTS – 4:54 PM
a. Request from Mayor Kassakhian to agendize a discussion about implementing static camera angle in City Council meetings Staff Comments:

Michael Garcia, City Attorney
Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Moved: Kassakhian Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Kassakhian
Noes: Gharpetian, Najarian

Absent: None
Abstain: None
b. Request from Mayor Kassakhian to agendize a discussion about campaign mailers for future elections
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Najarian
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Najarian, Kassakhian
Noes: Gharpetian

Absent: None
Abstain: None

2. CLOSED SESSION – 5:10 PM
a. Conference with Real Property Negotiators: City-designated negotiators: Roubik Golanian, John Takhtalian, Michael J. Garcia, Gillian van Muyden, Onnig Bulanikian and Domenica Megerdichian.

Property Location: Land located near the front entrance to the Adult Recreation Center at 201 E. Colorado St. Negotiating Parties: Filipino Business Association of Glendale – Greater Los Angeles County and Comfort Women Action for Redress and Education. Instructions to the 16 of 745

2 05 12 26 CC
negotiator(s) will concern the price and terms of lease of City property containing the Filipino American Friendship Monument and the Glendale Peace Monument
b. Conference with Labor Negotiators. The City-designated negotiators attending the closed session are: Roubik Golanian, John Takhtalian, Paula Adams, Michael J. Garcia, Gillian van Muyden, Jeff Brooks, Robert William, Daniel Hernandez and Scott Mellon. The names of the employee organizations are: Glendale City Employees’ Association, Glendale Fire Fighters’ Association, Glendale Police Officers’ Association, and I.B.E.W., Local 18
City Attorney Michael Garcia stated that the Council did not anticipate reporting out on these items. The Council recessed to Closed Session at 5:11 PM.

3. REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA – 6:05 PM
Roll Call – All Present
a. Flag Salute: Lea
b. Invocation: Rebecca Russell, Jewish Federation of the Greater San Gabriel and Pomona Valleys
c. Report of the City Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the May 12, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Glendale City Council was Posted on May 8, 2026, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

4. PRESENTATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS
a. Fremont Park CPRS Award of Excellence Presentation by Janine A.

Andrade
Presented by Janine A. Andrade, Recreation and Community Services Superintendent, City of Pasadena’s Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department.

Accepted by Onnig Bulanikian, Director, Community Services & Parks Department and department staff.
b. Jewish American Heritage Month Proclamation
Accepted by Rabbi Simcha Backman, Chabad of Glendale and the Foothill Community; Rebecca Russell, Jewish Federation of the Greater San Gabriel and Pomona Valleys; and Rabbi Rick Schechter, Temple Sinai of Glendale At the request of Mayor Kassakhian, the agenda order was adjusted and item 4b was presented first, followed by item 4a.
17 of 745

3 05 12 26 CC

5. CONSENT ITEMS (Including Minutes)
The following are routine and may be acted upon by one motion. Any Member of Council or the audience requesting separate consideration may do so by making such request before motion is proposed.
a. City Clerk, re: Minutes of the City Council Meeting of April 28, 2026, and the Special City Council Meeting of April 28, 2026
b. Public Works, re: Adopt the Specification for the Wastewater Shop Space Optimization Project

1. Resolution [26-48] adopting Specification No. 3969 for the Wastewater Shop Space Optimization Project and directing the City Clerk to advertise for bids
c. Public Works, re: Adopt the Plans and Specification for the South Glendale Pavement Management Program (PMP)
Implementation Project

1. Resolution [26-49] adopting the plans and specification for the South Glendale PMP Implementation Project, Specification No. 3964, Plan Nos. 1-3120, 1-3125, 3-1591, 49-264, 49-266, 7026-E1-6; and directing the City Clerk to advertise for bids
d. Fire Department, re: Used Oil Payment Program and Oil Recycling Grant Application

1. Resolution [26-50] Authorizing the Submittal of an Application to the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) for the Used Oil Payment Program (OPP)
e. Fire Department, re: Fire Department annual presentation of the status of State mandated fire inspections

1. Resolution [26-51] recognizing the Glendale Fire Department’s compliance with California Senate Bill 1205 and Health and Safety Code Sections 13146.2 and 13146.3 governing state-mandated fire inspections
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Najarian, Kassakhian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
18 of 745

4 05 12 26 CC

6. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS (Including reports from
conferences and regional meetings)
Councilmember Gharpetian asked staff to explore what can be done in the short and long term to improve safety at the intersection of Wabasso and Verdugo. He also asked the City Clerk to explain who approves candidate ballot designations and who manages ballot drop boxes. Additionally, he requested that staff conduct a survey of completed street projects, such as San Fernando Road, to evaluate the results of previous street design modifications and help inform future street design decisions.

City Clerk Dr. Abajian stated that the City Clerk’s Office reviews and approves ballot designations, ensures they comply with official guidelines, and consults with county elections officials whenever questions arise. She noted that the County Clerk’s Office selects the locations of ballot drop boxes and collects ballots from them on a daily basis through election day. She added that the City Clerk’s Office identified the need to relocate a ballot drop box at the library due to construction and worked with the County Clerk’s Office and the Glendale Public Works Department to move it to another area of the library grounds away from the construction activity.

Councilmember Najarian called for an election watchdog or referee, noting what he believes to be improper election practices, including a candidate meet-and- greet at Glendale Community College where only some GCC Board candidates were invited. Mayor Kassakhian stated that this claim was false and noted that the event organizers had shown him emails demonstrating that invitations had been sent to all candidates. Councilmember Najarian also celebrated the opening of the Metro D Line segment from Union Station to Beverly Hills over the weekend. He further shared information with the public regarding how the Council conducts Closed Session meetings.

City Attorney Garcia provided additional clarification regarding Closed Session meetings.

Councilmember Asatryan expressed support for candidates engaging with students from colleges and schools, stating that such involvement promotes civic engagement and volunteerism. Councilmember Gharpetian stated that he has never campaigned at a school or college.

Councilmember Brotman requested that the Police Chief provide an update on traffic enforcement at a future meeting. He also requested an update on the speed camera pilot program and asked about his previous request regarding a new law that allows cities to pilot red-light camera programs using a similar approach. In addition, he referenced the City of Los Angeles’ adaptive reuse ordinance and requested either a memorandum or an agendized discussion on 19 of 745

5 05 12 26 CC
the topic.

City Clerk Dr. Abajian reminded the public that campaign signs should be placed on private property and not within the public right-of-way. She asked residents to notify the City Clerk’s Office of improperly placed signs so staff can alert Code Enforcement to remove them. She also reminded the public that the last day to register to vote is May 18, 2026. Residents who miss that deadline may still register at the 11-day and 4-day vote centers and cast a provisional ballot.

Locations of ballot drop boxes and vote centers can be found at glendalevotes.org.

Mayor Kassakhian asked the public to report signs they believe are improperly placed rather than removing them themselves.

Interim Police Chief Robert William shared that May 15, 2026, is Peace Officers Memorial Day and that Police Week serves as a time to honor and remember the courage, sacrifice, and unwavering commitment of law enforcement professionals in Glendale and across the country. He announced that on May 15 at 7:00 a.m., a small private gathering would be held in front of Glendale Police Department headquarters to honor the four Glendale police officers who made the ultimate sacrifice.

Mayor Kassakhian shared that he attended the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) meeting the previous week, where housing affordability, regional emergency preparedness, and planning for large-scale events such as the World Cup and Olympic Games were among the primary topics discussed.

He also noted that he would be attending a conference hosted by Google the following week regarding the company’s artificial intelligence tools. The budget study session scheduled for the following day had been postponed, and the next session would be held on Thursday, May 21, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. He announced that the Children’s Clothing and Book Swap would take place on May 13, 2026, at Glendale Central Library. The 2026 Small Business Summit, “Let’s Go Glendale,” would be held on May 14, 2026, from 2:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. at Embassy Suites. He also announced several upcoming Memorial Day events, including the Montrose Memorial Day Ceremony on May 25, 2026, from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. at the Vietnam War Memorial at Ocean View Boulevard and Honolulu Avenue, and the City of Glendale’s Memorial Day Ceremony on May 25, 2026, at 9:30 a.m. at the Veterans Memorial outside City Hall at 613 E.

Broadway.

7. COMMUNITY EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS (3-minutes per speaker) Members of the public will be permitted to announce upcoming events taking place in the community.
20 of 745

6 05 12 26 CC

8. FIRST PERIOD OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Maximum 3 minutes per speaker, 30-minute aggregate speaking time limit)
Members of the public may address the Council on agenda items or non-agenda items within the City Council’s subject matter jurisdiction. If a speaker addresses the Council on an agenda item during the First Period of Oral Communications, they may not speak again when the agenda item is called. A speaker who addresses the Council on non-agenda items during the First Period of Oral Communications may not speak during the Second Period of Oral Communications.

Tony Passarella
Herbert Molano
Mike Mohill
Jackie Gish
Mike Khodbye
Scott Peer
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Councilmember Brotman stepped away at 7:23 PM and returned at 7:26 PM.

9. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES

10. ACTION ITEMS
a. Public Works, re: Purchase Bus Shelters Using the California Association for Coordinated Transportation (CALACT)/Basin Transit Purchasing Cooperative and Purchase Enhanced Bus Stops
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Presentation:

Martha D’Andrea, Deputy Director, Public Works Department Public Speakers:

Mike Borisov

1. Motion authorizing the Deputy Director of Finance/Purchasing, or a designee, to issue a Purchase Order Contract for $686,434 for bus shelters from Tolar Manufacturing Company, Inc., using the CALACT/Basin Transit Purchasing Cooperative
21 of 745

7 05 12 26 CC
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Gharpetian
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Najarian, Kassakhian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

2. Resolution [26-52] to dispense with the competitive bidding process and authorize the Deputy Director of Finance/Purchasing, or his designee, to issue a Purchase Order Contract for $363,566 for 34 enhanced bus stops from Tolar Manufacturing Company, Inc. in the same style as the bus shelters
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Gharpetian
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Najarian, Kassakhian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

3. Resolution [26-53] of Appropriation appropriating grant funds and Proposition C Local Return transit grant matching funds for bus stop improvements
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Gharpetian
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Najarian, Kassakhian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
Councilmember Asatryan stepped away during the presentation and returned at 7:32 PM.
b. Public Works, re: Purchase 20 Electric Buses Using the California Association for Coordinated Transportation (CALACT)/Basin Transit Purchasing Cooperative
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Daniel Hernandez, Director, Public Works Department
22 of 745

8 05 12 26 CC
Presentation:

Martha D’Andrea, Deputy Director, Public Works Department Public Speakers:

Mike Borisov
Beth Brooks

1. Motion authorizing the Deputy Director of Finance/Purchasing, or his designee, to issue a Purchase Order for 20 electric buses from GILLIG, LLC (GILLIG), for $29,331,060, using the federalized CALACT/Basin Transit Purchasing Cooperative
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Najarian, Kassakhian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

2. Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute Project Grant Agreements and Project Readiness Certification with Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) to receive federal Congestion Management Air Quality (CMAQ) Program funding, Measure M Subregional funds, and Metro Local Transit Systems Subcommittee ZEV funds
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Najarian, Kassakhian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

3. Resolution [26-54] of Appropriation for grant funds and City Measure R and Proposition Local Return transit grant matching funds to purchase electric buses
23 of 745

9 05 12 26 CC
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Najarian, Kassakhian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
Mayor Kassakhian stepped away at 7:44 PM and returned at 7:53 PM.

Councilmember Asatryan stepped away at 7:55 PM and returned at 8:02 PM.

Councilmember Gharpetian stepped away at 7:59 PM and returned at 8:00 PM.

Councilmember Najarian stepped away at 8:10 PM and returned at 8:12 PM.

11. HEARINGS
a. Community Development, re: Amendments to Title 30 of the Glendale Municipal Code, 1995 (Zoning Code), to update existing development standards and provide new objective design standards for multi- family and residential mixed use development in residential and commercial zones (Zoning Code Amendment Case Nos. PZC-0007- 2023 and PZC-0008-2023)
Mayor Kassakhian opened the public hearing at 8:23 PM and closed it at 9:52 PM.

Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Michael Garcia, City Attorney
Presentation:

Vilia Zemaitaitis, Assistant Director – Long Range Planning, Community Development Department
Teresa Santilena, Principal Planner – Long Range Planning, Community Development Department
Public Speakers:

Mike Borisov
Ejmin Hakobian
Beth Brooks
Lisa Moore
Allan Durham
Dorothy
24 of 745

10 05 12 26 CC

1. Introduction of Ordinance Amending Title 30 to Update Multi-Family Residential Development Standards and Provide New Objective Design Standards for Multi-family and Residential Mixed-Use Projects in Residential and Commercial Districts
Councilmember Asatryan introduced the Ordinance on May 12, 2026.

Councilmember Najarian stepped away at 8:48 PM and returned at 8:50 PM.

Mayor Kassakhian stepped away at 8:51 PM and returned at 8:52 PM.

Councilmember Brotman stepped away at 8:54 PM and returned at 8:56 PM.

12. REPORTS - INFORMATION

13. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

14. SECOND PERIOD OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Discussion is limited to items NOT a part of this agenda. Each speaker is allowed 5 minutes. Council may question or respond to the speaker, but there will be no debate or decision. The City Manager may refer the matter to the appropriate department for investigation and report.

Ejmin Hakobian
Radon Vachagan
Mike Borisov
Dorothy
Beth Brooks
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Councilmember Gharpetian stepped away at 9:53 PM and returned at 9:55 PM.

15. NEW BUSINESS

16. ADJOURNMENT – 10:28 PM
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Najarian
Mayor of the City of Glendale
City Clerk of the City of Glendale
25 of 745

1 05 19 26 CC

M I N U T E S

GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor Glendale, CA 91206
Teleconference Location
Towne Place Suites by Marriott Sunnyvale Silicon Valley (Conference Room/Business Center)
606 S Bernardo Ave, Sunnyvale, CA 94087
MAY 19, 2026

ROLL CALL

1. DISCUSSION OF COUNCILMEMBER FUTURE AGENDA REQUESTS

2. CLOSED SESSION

3. REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA – 6:06 PM
Roll Call – All Present (Mayor Kassakhian and Councilmember Asatryan via teleconference location)
a. Flag Salute: Mayor Pro Tem Gharpetian
b. Invocation: Pastor Jonathan Henderson, Grace on the Hill at Vallejo Drive Church
c. Report of the City Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the May 19, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Glendale City Council was Posted on May 14, 2026, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

4. PRESENTATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS
a. Proclamation National Public Works Week
Accepted by Daniel Hernandez, Director, Public Works Department; Tatevik Vardanyan, Transit Associate, Public Works Department; and numerous Public Works staff
b. Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month Proclamation Accepted by Edith Fuentes, President, Filipino American Business Association of Glendale (FABAG-GLAC) and board members; Michael Matsuda, President and Founder, Martial Arts History Museum; Lady Lallaine Reed, Advisory Board Member and Hall of Fame Member, Martial Arts History Museum; T.C. Kim, President, Korean American Foundation of Glendale; Keiko Nakada, Shoseian Tea House and Sister Cities Representative for Japan
c. Proclamation National Historic Preservation Month
Accepted by Taleen Barsoumian, President, Glendale Historical Society; Ani Mnatsakanyan, Historical Preservation Planner, Community Development Department; Allan Durham and Kevork Bartanian, Historic Preservation Commission
26 of 745

2 05 19 26 CC

5. CONSENT ITEMS (Including Minutes)
The following are routine and may be acted upon by one motion. Any Member of Council or the audience requesting separate consideration may do so by making such request before motion is proposed.
a. City Clerk, re: Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting of April 30, 2026, City Council Meeting of May 5, 2026
b. Police Department, re: Acceptance and Appropriation of BJA 2025 DNA Capacity Enhancement for Backlog Reduction Grant

1. Motion authorizing acceptance of the BJA 2025 DNA Capacity Enhancement for Backlog Reduction Grant and authorizing the City Manager, or a designee, to execute the necessary agreements, certification, and other documents required to accept the Grant

2. Resolution [26-55] of appropriation to appropriate $250,000 in BJA 2025 DNA Capacity Enhancement and Backlog Reduction Grant funds
c. Public Works, re: Authorization to Repurpose Appropriation of $400,000 in Transportation Development Act (TDA) Funds

1. Resolution [26-56] of Appropriation of $400,000 in Transportation Development Act (TDA) Funds to the Maintenance District 6 Pavement Rehabilitation Project – Phase II, Specification No. 3952 Moved: Brotman Seconded: Najarian
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Najarian, Kassakhian, Gharpetian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
Mayor Pro Tem Gharpetian announced the Council will reorder the agenda and will next consider Item 9a and 10d before returning to the agenda order.

6. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS (Including reports from
conferences and regional meetings)
Mayor Kassakhian and Councilmember Asatryan left the meeting at 7:08 PM.

Councilmember Najarian shared that he attended the Contract Cities Association Spring Conference over the weekend, where topics discussed included homelessness, water issues, public safety, marketing, and county government matters.

Mayor Pro Tem Gharpetian shared that he attended the annual Senior Street Festival & 90+ Celebration and the “Let’s Grow Glendale” Small Business 27 of 745

3 05 19 26 CC
Summit. He also highlighted several upcoming community events. The grand opening of Erewhon at 520 North Glendale Avenue will take place on May 20, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. The grand opening of the Inclusive Voices Podcast Studio will be held on May 20, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. at 123 North Artsakh Avenue. The second Budget Study Session is scheduled for May 21, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. in Council Chambers. The Glendale Noon Rotary will host the Glendale Collaborative Social Hour on May 21, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. at 801 N. Brand Boulevard. He also reminded the public that the City of Glendale’s annual Memorial Day Ceremony will be held on May 25, 2026, at 9:30 a.m. at the Veterans Memorial outside City Hall. Mayor Pro Tem Gharpetian concluded his remarks by wishing his wife a happy 32nd wedding anniversary.

City Clerk Dr. Abajian reminded Glendale voters that they can visit glendalevotes.org to find the locations of ballot drop boxes and vote centers. She noted that the 11-day vote centers will open on May 23, 2026, and the 4-day vote centers will open on May 30, 2026.

7. COMMUNITY EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS (3-minutes per speaker) Members of the public will be permitted to announce upcoming events taking place in the
community.

Alex Nahle
Dalia Lomeli
Beth Brooks

8. FIRST PERIOD OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Maximum 3 minutes per speaker, 30-minute aggregate speaking time limit)
Members of the public may address the Council on agenda items or non-agenda items within the City Council’s subject matter jurisdiction. If a speaker addresses the Council on an agenda item during the First Period of Oral Communications, they may not speak again when the agenda item is called. A speaker who addresses the Council on non-agenda items during the First Period of Oral Communications may not speak during the Second Period of Oral Communications.

Tamara Morsesyan
Tony Passarella
Mike Mohill
Margaret Kelly
Jane Viar
Lisa Morris
Jennie Quinonez
Allen Dish
Judy Lan
28 of 745

4 05 19 26 CC

9. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES
a. Community Development, re: AN ORDINANCE [6052] OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 30.17
“OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS”, AMENDING CHAPTER

30.11 “RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS”,CHAPTER 30.12
“COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS”, SECTION 30.31.020
“LANDSCAPING”, SECTION 30.47.020 “DESIGN REVIEW”, AND
CHAPTER 30.70 ENTITLED “DEFINITIONS”,TITLE 30 OF THE
GLENDALE MUNICIPAL CODE, 1995, RELATING TO

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND NEW OBJECTIVE DESIGN

STANDARDS FOR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND MULTI-

FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MIXED-USE ZONING PROJECTS (CASE
NOS. PZC-0007-2023 AND PZC-0008-2023) (Asatryan 5/12/2026) Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Michael Garcia, City Attorney
Presentation:

Vilia Zemaitaitis, Assistant Director – Long Range Planning, Community Development Department
Public Speakers:

Susan Wolfson
Allen Dish
Moved: Najarian Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Najarian, Kassakhian, Gharpetian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

10. ACTION ITEMS
a. Public Works, re: Approval of New Programming and Program Modifications to Measure R Sub-Regional Projects
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Daniel Hernandez, Director, Public Works Department
Presentation:

Rustom Tavitian, Senior Civil Engineer, Public Works Department 29 of 745

5 05 19 26 CC
Public Speakers:

Beth Brooks
Ejmin Hakobian
Fernando Roldan

1. Motion approving new programming and modifying existing programming within the adopted Measure R Sub-Regional Program Moved: Najarian Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Brotman, Najarian, Gharpetian
Noes: None

Absent: Asatryan, Kassakhian
Abstain: None
b. Fire Department, re: Fire Department Billing Consolidation and Request for Appropriations
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Jeff Brooks, Chief, Glendale Fire Department
Public Speakers:

Beth Brooks

1. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute Amendment No. 5 to the Professional Services Agreement with Wittman Enterprises, LLC (C105522A) increasing the contracted amount to account for the increased billing services for Fire Prevention Bureau programs and ambulance billing services due to increased revenues associated with the Public Provider Ground Emergency Medical Transportation Inter-Governmental Transfer (PP-GEMT-IGT) program, thus increasing the contract amount by $350,000 to the new total not-to- exceed amount of $3,661,037

2. Resolution [26-57] of Appropriation
Moved: Najarian Seconded: Brotman
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Brotman, Gharpetian, Najarian
Noes: None

Absent: Asatryan, Kassakhian
Abstain: None
30 of 745

6 05 19 26 CC
c. Police Department, re: Police Department Brand Standardization for Axon Enterprise Inc. products, hardware, software, parts and maintenance; dispensing with competitive bidding and authorizing the City Manager or designee to enter into a 10-year contract with Axon Enterprise, Inc
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Presentation:

Robert William, Interim Chief, Glendale Police Department Public Speakers:

Beth Brooks
Ejmin Hakobian
Fernando Roldan

1. Resolution [26-58] adopting Axon Enterprise Inc. products, hardware, software, technology and licenses as the City’s standard for the Police Department, dispensing with competitive bidding and authorizing the City Manager or designee to enter into a Ten-Year Agreement in an Amount Not to Exceed $22,976,504
Moved: Najarian Seconded: Gharpetian
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Najarian, Gharpetian
Noes: None

Absent: Asatryan, Kassakhian
Abstain: Brotman
d. Public Works, re: Solid Waste Collection Rates Update and Authorization to Reduce Previously Adopted Solid Waste Rate Increases Scheduled for July 1, 2026, and July 1, 2027
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Daniel Hernandez, Director, Public Works Department
Presentation:

Orlando Urquidez, Jr., Senior Public Works Management Analyst, Public Works Department
31 of 745

7 05 19 26 CC
Public Speakers:

Ejmin Hakobian
Mike Mohill

1. Resolution [26-59] Reducing the Previously Adopted Solid Waste Collection Rate Increases of 10% Effective July 1, 2026, and 10% Effective July 1, 2027, Adopted Pursuant to Resolution No. 23-75, and Approving Revised Rate Increases of 4% Effective July 1, 2026, and 3% Effective July 1, 2027
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Najarian
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Najarian, Kassakhian
Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: Gharpetian

11. HEARINGS

12. REPORTS - INFORMATION

13. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

Beth Brooks
Ejmin Hakobian

15. NEW BUSINESS

16. ADJOURNMENT – 9:09 PM
Moved: Najarian Seconded: Brotman
Mayor Pro Tem of the City of
Glendale
City Clerk of the City of Glendale
32 of 745

1 06 02 26 CC

M I N U T E S

GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
613 E. Broadway, 2nd Floor Glendale, CA 91206
JUNE 2, 2026

ROLL CALL

1. DISCUSSION OF COUNCILMEMBER FUTURE AGENDA REQUESTS
a. Mayor Kassakhian’s Request for a Discussion on a Compensation Management Policy that Considers the City’s Financial Status b. Mayor Kassakhian’s Request to Agendize a Report to
Consider Retaining a Financial Consultant to Review the City’s Fiscal Condition
Mayor Kassakhian requested these items be moved to next week’s agenda.

2. CLOSED SESSION

3. REGULAR BUSINESS AGENDA – 6:03 PM
Roll Call – All Present (Councilmember Brotman arrived at 6:03 PM after roll call) a. Flag Salute: Mayor Kassakhian
b. Invocation: Jeff Brooks, Chief, Glendale Fire Department c. Report of the City Clerk, re: Posting of Agenda. The Agenda for the June 2, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Glendale City Council was Posted on May 28, 2026, on the Bulletin Board Outside City Hall.

4. PRESENTATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS

5. CONSENT ITEMS (Including Minutes)
The following are routine and may be acted upon by one motion. Any Member of Council or the audience requesting separate consideration may do so by making such request before motion is proposed.
a. Police Department, re: The Police Department’s 2025 Specialized Equipment Use Report

1. Motion to note and file this report
b. Public Works, re: Award Construction Contract for the Renovation of Fire Station No. 27 Project

1. Motion authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute a construction contract with ARC Construction, Inc. for the Renovation of Fire Station No. 27 Project, in the amount of $979,503 plus a 7.4% construction reserve of $72,659
33 of 745

2 06 02 26 CC
Moved: Asatryan Seconded: Gharpetian
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Gharpetian, Najarian, Kassakhian Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

6. CITY COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS (Including reports from
conferences and regional meetings)
Councilmember Gharpetian shared photos depicting traffic and cycling violations on La Crescenta Avenue. He also wished good luck to all candidates participating in the election.

Councilmember Najarian discussed the challenges faced by current and prospective City Council candidates in balancing the demands of public service with full-time employment. He proposed the creation of a new City position or the engagement of an outside contractor to serve in a role similar to that of an ethics officer. He also shared that the groundbreaking ceremony for the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) project was held at City Hall the previous week and noted that a lawsuit has been filed against the City of Burbank for allegedly failing to approve plans and specifications in a timely manner.

Councilmember Asatryan noted that the Ethics Commission item is still scheduled to come before the Council and asked Councilmember Najarian whether his proposal for an ethics officer was intended to be considered in conjunction with that discussion. Councilmember Najarian stated that he favored the independence and ability for more immediate action that an ethics officer could provide over a commission. Councilmember Asatryan indicated that the ethics officer proposal could be included as part of the forthcoming Ethics Commission discussion.

Councilmember Brotman read an email from a resident on La Crescenta Avenue that had been sent to all Councilmembers expressing satisfaction with the project's impact on neighborhood noise levels and traffic safety.

Mayor Kassakhian noted that it was Election Day, encouraged residents to vote, and congratulated all candidates participating in the election. He also reminded the public that election results often take time to be finalized.

City Clerk Dr. Abajian added that election results would be posted on glendalevotes.org. Councilmember Gharpetian asked whether ballots mailed on Election Day would still be counted. Dr. Abajian explained that mailed ballots must be postmarked by June 2, 2026, in order to be counted. Councilmember 34 of 745

3 06 02 26 CC
Asatryan added that ballots must also be received within seven days of Election Day.

Mayor Kassakhian announced that Budget Study Session No. 4 would take place on June 4, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. in Council Chambers. He also shared that the Rotary Club of Glendale's annual Cars for Cops and Kids Car Show would be held on June 7, 2026, at Verdugo Park. In addition, he noted that the City is seeking public feedback on the draft Local Hazard Mitigation Plan and that comments may be submitted through June 30, 2026, at glendaleca.gov/lhmp.

Mayor Kassakhian requested that the Council consider sponsoring a Fireworks 5K Run on the morning of July 4, 2026, in recognition of the nation's upcoming 250th anniversary.

7. COMMUNITY EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS (3-minutes per speaker) Members of the public will be permitted to announce upcoming events taking place in the community.

8. FIRST PERIOD OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Maximum 3 minutes per speaker, 30-minute aggregate speaking time limit)
Members of the public may address the Council on agenda items or non-agenda items within the City Council’s subject matter jurisdiction. If a speaker addresses the Council on an agenda item during the First Period of Oral Communications, they may not speak again when the agenda item is called. A speaker who addresses the Council on non-agenda items during the First Period of Oral Communications may not speak during the Second Period of Oral Communications.

Tony Passarella
Mike Khodbyan
Herbert Molano
Les Hammer
Jackie Gish
Ramy
Ani Khash
Councilmember Asatryan stepped out at 6:34 PM and returned at 6:44 PM.

9. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES

10. ACTION ITEMS
a. Glendale Water and Power, re: Solar Energy Power Sales Agreement:
30-Year Power Sales Agreement (PSA) with Southern California Public Power Authority (SCPPA) for Purchase of 25 MW from Notch Peak Project
35 of 745

4 06 02 26 CC
Staff Comments:

Roubik Golanian, City Manager
Scott Mellon, General Manager, Glendale Water & Power
Presentation:

Ileana Cardenas, Integrated Resource Planning Administrator, Glendale Water & Power
Public Speakers:

Beth Brooks
Jackie Gish

1. Resolution [26-60] authorizing a 30-year Power Sales Agreement (PSA) with Southern California Public Power Authority (SCPPA) for the purchase of 25 MW (or equivalently, a 7.72% entitlement share of the 324 MW contract capacity) of renewable solar energy and environmental attributes from the Notch Peak Project, and finding that the City’s action authorizing purchase of 25 MW of solar power from SCPPA is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15061 and 15277
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Asatryan
Vote as Follows:

Ayes: Asatryan, Brotman, Najarian, Kassakhian
Noes: Gharpetian

Absent: None
Abstain: None

11. HEARINGS

12. REPORTS - INFORMATION

13. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

Beth Brooks
Victoria Valentine

15. NEW BUSINESS
36 of 745

5 06 02 26 CC

16. ADJOURNMENT – 7:29 PM
Moved: Brotman Seconded: Asatryan
Mayor of the City of Glendale
City Clerk of the City of Glendale
37 of 745

5b
26-90153

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Award of Construction Contract for the District 12 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Curb Ramp Installation and Sidewalk Repair Program 1) Motion awarding a construction contract to Kalban, Inc. in the amount of $2,575,317, approving a 20 percent construction reserve in the amount of $515,063, and authorizing the City Manager or a designee to execute the contract.

2) Resolution of appropriation, to appropriate funds in the amount of $3,347,912 for the District 12 ADA Curb Ramp Installation and Sidewalk Repair Program.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for June 23, 2026 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Program will repair damaged sidewalks and other infrastructure, improving safety and accessibility in the District 12 of city.

On May 6, 2026, nine bids were received for the District 12 ADA Curb Ramp Installation and Sidewalk Repair Program, and after a thorough review, staff determined that Kalban, Inc.’s (Kalban) bid to be a responsive bid from a responsible bidder.

The intent of this item is for the City Council to award a contract to Kalban that will cost $2,575,317 with a 20 percent construction reserve of $515,063, totaling $3,090,380.

Additionally, a resolution of appropriation is needed to appropriate funds from the State Gas Tax Fund to fund this project.

RECOMMENDATION
Approve the motion authorizing a construction contract with Kalban for the District 12 ADA Curb Ramp Installation and Sidewalk Repair Program, in the amount of $2,575,317 plus a 20 percent construction reserve of $515,063 and approve the resolution of appropriation to appropriate funds in the amount of $3,347,912 from the State Gas Tax Fund for the Project.
38 of 745

5b2
26-90153
6 8
6 6

ANALYSIS
As part of the Public Works Department’s ongoing efforts to improve the condition of the city’s sidewalks, the plans and specifications were prepared for the District 12 ADA Curb Ramp Installation and Sidewalk Repair Program.

The project scope of work includes the following:
Selective removal, repair, and reconstruction of damaged curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveways, cross gutters, and alley aprons;
Selective removal, repair, and reconstruction of damaged asphalt and Portland cement concrete pavements;
Installation of new ADA compliant curb ramps where none existed; and Modification and reconstruction of existing ramps to meet current ADA standards.

The proposed project includes improvements that will comply with current Federal ADA guidelines.

On March 31, 2026, the City Council adopted the project plans and specification and authorized the City Clerk to advertise the project for bids. The project was advertised in the Glendale Independent, the city’s website, as well as various online platforms.

On May 6, 2026, the city received nine bids from contractors as follows:

1. Kalban, Inc. $2,575,317

2. Vart Construction, Inc. $2,877,722

3. Gentry General Engineering, Inc. $2,963,849

4. CJ Concrete Construction, Inc. $3,044,613

5. Towo Enterprises, Inc. $3,820,385

6. Van Engineering, Inc. $4,131,397

7. Carter Enterprises Group, Inc. $4,287,714

8. Palp, Inc. DBA Excel Paving $4,498,874

9. Environmental Construction, Inc. $5,960,219
Upon review of the bid documents, staff finds the bid of Kalban of $2,575,317 to be the lowest responsive bid from a responsible bidder. The bid of Kalban in the amount of $2,575,317 is approximately 36% below the Engineer’s Estimate of $4,000,000.

Staff also recommends establishing a construction reserve in the amount of $515,063, or 20 percent of the bid amount, based on previous experience with similar projects and is in conformance with the nature of this project. This reserve will allow the city to address additional, incidental, unforeseen, or necessary work identified during construction, including related improvements within and adjacent to the project limits.

This approach enables the city to take advantage of economies of scale while reducing the likelihood of future mobilizations, disruptions, and added costs. It also provides flexibility to respond to unforeseen field conditions that could not be fully identified 39 of 745

5b3
26-90153
6 8
6 6
during the design phase, such as uplifted sidewalks, damaged driveway aprons, broken curbs and gutters, or other site conditions encountered between completion of design and the start of construction, and to complete any resulting nearby improvements efficiently under the current contract.

Furthermore, staff has budgeted approximately ten percent of the construction amount, or $257,532, for construction management and engineering support services such as project management, project engineering, construction inspection, quality assurance and control.

District 12 ADA Curb Ramp Installation and Sidewalk Repair Program Construction Bid $ 2,575,317
20% Construction Reserve $ 515,063
10% Construction Management & Engineering Support $ 257,532 Total Construction Cost $ 3,347,912
The State of California Contractors State License Board website confirms that the license of Kalban is current, active, and in good standing. Additionally, staff contacted the references provided by Kalban and found they had satisfactorily completed their projects. Also, Kalban recently completed construction of the city’s West Glendale ADA Curb Ramp Installation and Sidewalk Repair Program Phase I Project in a satisfactory manner.

The construction of this project is anticipated to begin in September 2026 and is scheduled for completion by February 2027.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
As a result of this project, the public will gain improved accessibility and walkability throughout the project neighborhoods and improved safety for all users.

Approximately 8,250 notifications were sent to property owners and occupants along the project limits notifying them of the in-person and virtual community meeting for the project on January 15, 2026 at 6:00 p.m. The in-person and virtual community meeting was also broadcast on the city’s YouTube channel. During the meeting, the public was informed of the project details, construction schedule, future city and contractor notifications, and the impacts of the construction work in their neighborhood.

Participants also had the opportunity to phone in and provide their comments and/or ask questions regarding the project.

Approximately one month before the commencement of construction, staff will prepare a notification postcard containing essential project details including a link to the project website. The postcard will be sent by mail to the residences and businesses that will be affected by the construction. Additionally, the contractor will be responsible for distributing door hangers to the affected addresses. The door hangers will be provided one week prior to the start of any construction activity within the project area. 40 of 745

5b4
26-90153
6 8
6 6
Furthermore, outreach on these projects continues to occur through social media and a dedicated project website that is hosted through the City of Glendale domain. The website familiarizes the public with the project and the project team, explains the scope of work and project locations, and provides the public with staff contact information for questions, discussion, and/or input.

FISCAL IMPACT
The construction of the District 12 ADA Curb Ramp Installation and Sidewalk Repair Program will cost $3,347,912, inclusive of a 20% construction reserve ($515,063) and 10% construction management ($257,532), which was not included in the FY 2025-26 budget. Therefore, staff is requesting an appropriation of $3,347,912 from the State Gas Tax Fund. The appropriation requests are outlined below:

Requesting Appropriation
Amount From (Account
String) To (Account String) Funding Source
$3,347,912 GL: 24219-4020-
PWD-0000-P0000
GL:52100-4020-PWD-
0020-P0000
PL:PWD01599AN
State Gas Tax
Fund
Department Cost Center Program
Public Works Projects

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The Project is categorically exempt from environmental review because of CEQA Guidelines §15301.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Do not approve the motion authorizing a construction contract and resolution of appropriation for the District 12 ADA Curb Ramp Installation and Sidewalk Repair Program. Doing so, however, will not improve the condition of the city’s sidewalks.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Daniel Hernandez, Director of Public Works
Prepared by:

Sarkis Oganesyan, Assistant Director of Public Works/City Engineer 41 of 745

5b5
26-90153
6 8
6 6
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Project Location Map
42 of 745

MOTION
Moved by Council Member , seconded
by Council Member , that the Council of the City of
Glendale hereby:

1. Authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a construction contract – subject to approval by the City Attorney – with Kalban, Inc. for the District 12 ADA Curb Ramp Installation and Sidewalk Repair Program, Specification No. 4039, in the amount of $2,575,317.00.

2. Authorizes a 20 percent construction reserve, equal to $515,063.

Votes as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

City Clerk
43 of 745

RESOLUTION
NO.

RESOLUTION
OF
THE

COUNCIL
OF
THE
CITY
OF

GLENDALE
MAKING
AN

APPROPRIATION
BE
IT

RESOLVED
BY
THE

COUNCIL
OF
THE
CITY
OF
GLENDALE:

SECTION
1:

That
the
sum
of
$3,347,912
is
hereby
appropriated
and/or
transferred
from
the
following
accounts
to
the
following
accounts:

ACCOUNTS

DESCRIPTION
FROM
TO
24219-4020-PWD-0000
State
Gas
Tax
Mandates,
State
Gas
Tax
$3,347,912
Fund.

Public
Works
521
00-4020-PWD-0020-P0000
Construction,
State
Gas
Tax
Fund,
Public
$3,347,912
PWDO1599AN
Works,
Projects,
MD12
ADA
&
Sidewalk
Program
To
appropriate
funding
for
the
MD12
ADA
&
Sidewalk
Program.

SECTION
2:

The
Director
of
Finance
is
authorized
to
make
such
other
revisions,
individual
appropriation
line-items,
changes
in
summaries,
fund
totals,
grand
totals,
and
other
portions
of
the
budget
document
as
necessary
to
reflect
and
implement
the
changes
specified
in
this
resolution.

SECTION
3:

The
City
Clerk
shall
certify
to
the
adoption
of
this
Resolution.

Adopted
this
day
of
________________,
2026.

Mayor
ATTEST:

CITY
OF

GLENDALE
DATE
6/9/2
6 ___________________________

APPROVED
AS
TO

FINANCIAL
City
Clerk

PROVISION
FOR
$
3,347,912
-a_—
—E::z-,-
Director
of
Finance
STATE
OF

CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY
OF
LOS

ANGELES)
55 CITY
OF

GLENDALE)
I,Suzie
Abajian,
City
Clerk
of
the
City
of
Glendale,
do
hereby
certify
that
the
foregoing
Resolution
No.
was
adopted
by
the
Council
of
the
City
of
Glendale,
California,
at
aregular
meeting
held
on
the__________
day
of
________________,
2026,
and
that
the
same
was
adopted
by
the
following
vote:

Ayes:Noes:Absent:Abstain:

City
Clerk
44 of 745

LOWELL AVE.

I-210 FWY
LOWELL AVE.

GLENCOVE AVE.

BURRITT WY.

SKYVIEW LN.

BRITTANY LN.

DAY ST.

ACAMPO AVE.

VERWOOD AVE.

REYNARD AVE.

MARKRIDGE RD.

EL CAMINO ST.

LOS AMIGOS ST.

EL MORENO ST.

LOS OLIVOS LN.

PONTIAC ST.FOOTHILL BLVD.

FOURTH AVE.

ABELLA ST.

COMMUNITY AVE.

FOOTHILL BLVD.

NEW YORK AVE.

PENNSYLVANIA AVE.

NEW YORK AVE.

FRANKLIN ST.GLENCOVE AVE.

SECOND AVE.

FIFTH AVE.

ALTURA AVE.

MARYANN ST.

DANNY DR.REBECCA AVE.

EL CAMINITO ST.

FREDERICK AVE.

FINEHILL AVE.

HENRITETTA AVE.

DUNSMORE AVE.DUNSMORE AVE.

LAUDERDALE AVE.

FAIRESTA ST.

WILLALEE
AVE.

ALLEY 10
THELMA ST.

ALLEY 138
BOSTON AVE. BOSTON AVE.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

CITY OF LOS ANGELESCITY OF GLENDALE
SKY RIDGE RD.

N
DISTRICT 12

ADA CURB RAMP INSTALLATION AND

SIDEWALK REPAIR PROJECT
LEGEND

PROJECT LOCATION

CITY LIMITS

45 of 745

FORESTGLEN
DR.

BEECHGLEN
DR.

BOSTON AVE.

FERNTREE
PL.

TANBARK
PL. HONOLULU AVE.

ENCINAL AVE.

HONOLULU AVE.

PARKVISTA DR.

PARKVISTA PL.

NEW YORK AVE.

PENNSYLVANIA AVE.

I-210 FWY
I-210 FWY
LA CRESCENTA AVE.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

CITY OF LOS ANGELES
MONTROSE AVE.

MANHATTAN AVE.HERMOSA AVE.

CLOUD AVE.

GLENWOOD
AVE.

CAMANNAVE.

SHIRLYJEAN
AVE.

EMANUEL DR.EILINITA AVE.

DOLORITA AVE.

LIBERTY AVE.

MILLS
AVE.

PIEDMONT AVE.

ALLEY 132
DUNSMORE AVE.

FREDERICK
AVE.

CEDARBEND DR.

EL LA
DO DR
.

PENNSYLVANIA AVE.

N
DISTRICT 12

ADA CURB RAMP INSTALLATION AND

SIDEWALK REPAIR PROJECT
LEGEND

PROJECT LOCATION

CITY LIMITS

46 of 745

5c
26-90200

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Professional Services Agreement (PSA) for Professional Engineering Services for the Wastewater Master Plan Update and As-Needed Wastewater Consulting Services.

1. Motion authorizing the City Manager or a designee to enter into and execute a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with HDR Engineering, Inc. to provide Professional Engineering Services for the Wastewater Master Plan Update and As-Needed Wastewater Consulting Services in an amount not to exceed $621,472.

2. Resolution of appropriation of $115,472 from the Sewer Fund to provide adequate funding for the PSA

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for June 23, 2026 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A PSA is needed for a consultant to provide professional engineering services for the city’s Wastewater Master Plan (WWMP) Update and associated wastewater consulting services. The WWMP serves as a critical planning and operational tool for Public Works to evaluate, prioritize, maintain, and improve the city’s wastewater infrastructure system.

The updated WWMP will provide a comprehensive assessment of the structural integrity and hydraulic capacity of the wastewater collection system and establish short-term and long-term capital improvement priorities. The plan will also assist the city in maintaining compliance with State Water Resources Control Board requirements and industry standards.

Following a Request for Proposals (RFP) process, HDR Engineering, Inc. is recommended to perform the work for the WWMP Update and provide as-needed wastewater consulting services. The proposed PSA with HDR Engineering, Inc. will cost an amount not to exceed $621,472.

RECOMMENDATION
Approve the motion authorizing the City Manager to execute a PSA with HDR Engineering, Inc. for professional engineering services for the WWMP Update and as- 47 of 745

5c2
26-90200
6 8
9 2
needed wastewater consulting services in an amount not to exceed $621,472, and approve the resolution of appropriation to appropriate funds in the amount of $115,472 from the Sewer Fund, for professional engineering services for the WWMP Update and as-needed wastewater consulting services.

ANALYSIS
The City of Glendale provides wastewater collection and conveyance services to over 99 percent of residents and businesses within the city limits and approximately 2,300 customers within the Crescenta Valley Water District service area.

The city’s wastewater system consists of approximately 360 miles of wastewater pipelines, more than 7,550 manholes, and over 44,700 sewer laterals. Wastewater generated within Glendale is conveyed to the City of Los Angeles Hyperion Treatment Plant and the Los Angeles-Glendale Water Reclamation Plant (LAGWRP), the latter of which is jointly owned by the City of Glendale and the City of Los Angeles.

The WWMP is an essential planning document used to assess the condition, operational performance, and hydraulic capacity of the city’s wastewater collection system. The WWMP identifies existing and future infrastructure deficiencies and establishes capital improvement priorities necessary to maintain a safe, reliable, and efficient wastewater system.

The updated WWMP will include:
Comprehensive evaluation of existing wastewater infrastructure. Hydraulic modeling and capacity assessment.
Condition assessment and system performance review.
Development of repair, rehabilitation, and replacement programs. Capital Improvement Program (CIP) recommendations.
Evaluation of operational and maintenance practices; and As-needed wastewater consulting support services, including performing a Wastewater Financial Plan and Cost of Service Analysis. The financial & COSA analysis will support long-term infrastructure planning and evaluation of system sustainability and does not itself establish or approve future rate adjustments.

The city is required to inspect, assess, maintain, and operate its wastewater infrastructure in compliance with State Water Resources Control Board regulations, Waste Discharge Requirements, and industry best practices.

To hire the most qualified consultant, Public Works Engineering issued an RFP to several professional engineering consulting firms experienced in wastewater infrastructure planning and utility management services. The city received two proposals from consulting firms for the WWMP Update under RFP #2026-002. 48 of 745

5c3
26-90200
6 8
9 2
An evaluation team of staff from PWD reviewed the proposals. The proposals were all ranked based on the following criteria:
Staff qualifications and technical expertise.
Demonstrated understanding of project objectives and scope. Quality and responsiveness of proposal.
Project schedule and deliverables; and
Cost effectiveness.

Based on the combination of written submittals and the results of the interviews, the HDR Engineering, Inc. consultant team was determined to be the top-ranked firm for the WWMP update.

HDR Engineering, Inc. demonstrated extensive experience with wastewater master planning, hydraulic modeling, utility management, and regulatory compliance projects for municipalities throughout Southern California. The firm also demonstrated a clear understanding of the city’s wastewater system needs and long-term infrastructure planning goals, and they successfully completed the city’s latest WWMP update several years ago.

Following negotiations, staff refined the scope and fee structure with HDR Engineering, Inc., resulting in a reduced proposed cost from $573,165 to $564,975 while incorporating additional task efficiencies and refined deliverables. The total authorization of $621,472 includes a 10 percent contingency to address unforeseen conditions, additional “as-needed” technical analysis identified earlier, or regulatory coordination that may arise during development of the master plan. The WWMP Update is anticipated to be completed within approximately 18 months.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not applicable to this project

FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed PSA for the WWMP Update and as-needed wastewater consulting services will cost $621,472, including a 10% contingency of $56,497. Only $506,000 was approved as a part of the FY 2025-26 budget. Therefore, staff is requesting for an appropriation of $115,472 from the Sewer Fund. The appropriation request is outlined below:

Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$ 405,000 GL: 43110-5250-PWD-7526-P0000 Sewer Fund
Department Cost Center Program
Public Works
Department
Wastewater Management
Amount Account String Funding Source
$ 101,000 GL: 43110-5250-PWD-7528-P0000 Sewer Fund
49 of 745

5c4
26-90200
6 8
9 2
Department Cost Center Program
Public Works
Department
Wastewater Maintenance
Requesting Appropriation
Amount From (Account String) To (Account String) Funding Source $ 115,472 GL: 27900-5250-PWD-
000-P0000
GL:43110-5250-
PWD-7526-P0000
Sewer Fund
Department Cost Center Program
Public Works
Department
Wastewater Management

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
This action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 because the proposed action involves administrative and planning activities that will not result in a direct or indirect physical change to the environment.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
The names and business addresses of the members of the board of directors, the chairperson, CEO, COO, CFO, Subcontractors and any person or entity with more than 10 percent interest in the company proposed for contract in this Agenda Item Report are attached in Exhibit 1 and 2, in accordance with the City Campaign Finance Ordinance No. 5744.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Do not approve the motion. Doing so would delay the update of the city’s WWMP and limit the city’s ability to effectively plan, prioritize, and maintain wastewater infrastructure improvements and regulatory compliance activities.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Daniel Hernandez, Director of Public Works
Prepared by:

Luke Chen, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: HDR Engineering, Inc. Campaign Disclosure Forms Exhibit 2: Psomas Campaign Disclosure Forms
50 of 745

MOTION
Moved by Council Member _____________________________________, seconded by Council Member _____________________________________, that the Council of the City of Glendale hereby authorizes:

1. The City Manager or a designee to execute a Professional Services Agreement with HDR Engineering, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $621,472 for Professional Engineering Services for the Wastewater Master Plan Update and “As-Needed” Wastewater Consulting Services, as more fully described in the Report to the City Council.

2. Said agreement shall be subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney.

Adopted this _________ day of ____________________, 2026.

Vote as Follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
51 of 745

RESOLUTIONNO.

RESOLUTIONOFTHECOUNCILOFTHECITYOFGLENDALE

MAKINGANAPPROPRIATION
BEITRESOLVEDBYTHECOUNCILOFTHECITYOFGLENDALE:

SECTION1:Thatthesumof$115,472isherebyappropriatedand/ortransferredfromthefollowing accountstothefollowingaccounts:

ACCOUNTSDESCRIPTIONFROMTO
27900-5250-PWD-0000NetPosition,SewerFund,PublicWorks$115,472 4311O-5250-PWD-7526-P0000ContractualServices,SewerFund,Public$115472 Works,WastewaterManagement ToappropriatefundingforthePSAfortheMPUpdate.

SECTION2:TheDirectorofFinanceisauthorizedtomakesuchotherrevisions,individualappropriation line-items,changesinsummaries,fundtotals,grandtotals,andotherportionsofthebudgetdocumentas necessarytoreflectandimplementthechangesspecifiedinthisresolution.

SECTION3:TheCityClerkshallcertifytotheadoptionofthisResolution.

Adoptedthisdayof
________________,
2026.

Mayor
ATtEST:

C1TYOFGLENDALE
&t%DATE6/9/26
CWt.APPROVEDASTOFINANCIAL
CityClerkPROVISIONFOR$115,472
DirectorofFinance STATEOFCALIFORNIA)

COUNTYOFLOSANGELES)SS

CITYOFGLENDALE)
I,SuzieAbajian,CityClerkoftheCityofGlendale,doherebycertifythattheforegoingResolution No.wasadoptedbytheCounciloftheCityofGlendale,California,ataregularmeetingheldon the__________dayof
________________,
2026,andthatthesamewasadoptedbythefollowingvote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

CityClerk
52 of 745

53 of 745

54 of 745

HDR Engineering, Inc. – Board of Directors

Name Title Address
John Henderson, P.E. Chairman and Chief Executive Oﬃcer 1917 South 67th Street, Omaha, NE 68106 Neil Graﬀ, P.E. President and Chief Operating Oﬃcer 1917 South 67th Street, Omaha, NE 68106 Richard R. Bell, P.E. Former Chairman and Chief Executive 1917 South 67th Street, Omaha, NE 68106 Anthony J. Cotton Retired General United States Air Force 478 Butler Blvd, Oﬀutt Air Force Base, NE 68113 Thomas McLaughlin, P .E. T ransportation President 711 Westchester Ave, STE 103, White Plains, NY 10604
Eric L. Keen, P.E. Vice Chairman 1917 South 67th Street, Omaha, NE 68106 Erin Hunt, P .E. Water President 4830 W. Kennedy Blvd Suite 400, T ampa, FL 33609
Douglas S. Wignall, FAIA, RAIC, LEED AP Architecture President 1917 South 67th Street, Omaha, NE 68106 Helvi Sandvik President 4101 E 142nd Ave., Anchorage, AK 99516 John K. Wilson Former President 1917 South 67th Street, Omaha, NE 68106

55 of 745

Arcadis – Board of Directors (Subconsultant)

Name Title Address
Heather Polinsky Chief Executive Oﬃcer and Chairman of
the Executive Board
2101 L St NW, Washington, DC 20037
Simon Crowe Chief Financial Oﬃcer and Member of the
Executive Board
2101 L St NW, Washington, DC 20037
Edel Christie Global President, Places 2101 L St NW, Washington, DC 20037 Lucy England Interim Chief People Oﬃcer 2101 L St NW, Washington, DC 20037 Hans Dekker Chief Delivery Oﬃcer 2101 L St NW, Washington, DC 20037 Greg Steele Chief Growth Oﬃcer 2101 L St NW, Washington, DC 20037

56 of 745

K-Flow – Executives / Board of Directors (Subconsultant)

Name Title Address
Kevin Krajewski, PE President 1426 Union Street, Alameda, CA 94501

57 of 745

/i255
/i255
/2 /3 /i255
/i255
/i255
/5/6/i255/8/9/10/11/12/13/10/14/15/16/i255 /17 /i255/11/18/19 /20/18/9/21/22/i255/23 /9/22/18/22/11/16/i255/13/15/8/9 /22/18/22/11/16/i255 /24 /i255/11/13/22/10/14/12/25/18/22/25/10 /i255/18/22/8/i255 /10/14/26/11/13/22/10 /14/12/25/18/22/25/10/i255
/27 /28 /29 /i255 /30 /31 /32 /33 /i255 /30 /34 /35 /36 /37 /31 /38 /i255 /39 /40 /34 /41 /32 /29 /40 /i255/42/43/40 /31 /36 /39 /36 /37 /29 /i255 /44 /34 /45 /i255 /46 /47 /48 /48 /49 /i255 /50 /30 /39/51/41/39 /31 /52 /36 /i255 /53 /31 /36 /39 /36 /37 /29 /i255/42/43/40 /31 /36 /39 /36 /37 /29 /49 /54 /i255 /55 /28 /31 /37 /28 /i255 /56 /29 /37 /39/51/29/i255 /29 /57 /57 /29 /37 /32 /31 /58 /29 /i255 /34 /36 /i255 /59 /29 /41 /32 /29/51/56/29 /43 /i255 /60 /49 /i255 /61 /62 /63 /63 /49 /i255 /39 /36 /40 /i255 /39/51/29/36 /40 /29 /40 /i255 /31 /32 /i255 /55 /31 /32 /28 /i255/42/43/40 /31 /36 /39 /36 /37 /29 /i255 /44 /34 /45 /i255 /46 /47 /64 /65 /49 /i255 /55 /28 /31 /37 /28 /i255 /56 /29/37 /39/51/29/i255 /29 /57 /57 /29 /37 /32 /31 /58 /29 /i255 /34 /36 /i255/66/39/43 /37 /28 /i255 /63 /46 /49 /i255 /61 /62 /63 /61 /i255 /67 /50 /32 /28 /29 /i255/42/43/40 /31 /36 /39 /36 /37 /29 /54 /68 /45 /i255 /i255 /27 /28 /29 /i255/42/43/40 /31 /36 /39 /36 /37 /29 /i255 /41 /43 /34 /28 /31 /56 /31 /32 /69 /70 /i255 /i255 /67 /63 /68 /i255 /71 /i255 /30 /34 /36 /69 /35 /38 /32 /39 /36 /32 /72 /i255 /67 /31 /36 /37 /38 /35 /40 /31 /36 /52 /i255 /39 /i255 /69 /35 /56 /30 /34 /36 /69 /35 /38 /32 /39 /36 /32 /72 /72 /73/74/i255/76 /77 /78 /i255/77 /79 /80 /i255 /79 /i255 /81 /78 /82 /83 /84 /79 /81 /83 /i255 /55 /31 /32 /28 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /i255 /30 /31 /32 /33 /i255 /34 /57/i255/85/38/29 /36 /40 /39 /38 /29 /i255 /67 /50 /30 /31 /32 /33 /54 /68 /49 /i255/85/38/29 /36 /40 /39 /38 /29 /i255 /59 /35 /37 /37 /29 /69 /69 /34 /43 /i255 /71 /52 /29 /36 /37 /33 /i255 /34 /43 /i255/85/38/29 /36 /40 /39 /38 /29 /i255 /86 /29 /40 /29 /58 /29 /38 /34 /41/51/29/36 /32 /i255 /71 /52 /29 /36 /37 /33 /i255 /67 /50/85/59/71 /54 /68 /49 /i255 /34 /43 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /i255 /87 /34 /35 /69 /31 /36 /52 /i255 /71 /35 /32 /28 /34 /43 /31 /32 /33 /i255 /34 /57 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /i255 /30 /31 /32 /33 /i255 /34 /57 /i255/85/38/29 /36 /40/39 /38 /29 /i255 /67 /50 /87 /71 /54 /68 /i255 /39 /36 /40 /i255 /32 /28 /39 /32 /i255 /37 /34 /36 /32 /43 /39 /37 /32 /i255 /31 /69/i255 /69 /35 /56 /88 /29 /37 /32 /i255 /32 /34 /i255 /39 /41 /41 /43 /34 /89 /79 /90 /i255 /91 /92 /i255 /83 /77 /93 /i255 /94 /95 /83 /92 /i255 /94 /78 /96 /82 /81 /95 /90 /97 /i255/98/99/100 /97 /i255 /78 /84 /i255 /101 /100/74/i255/102 /84 /78/103/i255 /103/79/104 /95 /82 /105 /i255 /79 /i255 /81 /78 /82 /83 /84 /95 /91 /96 /83 /95 /78 /82 /i255 /83 /78 /i255 /79 /i255 /94 /95 /83 /92 /i255 /94 /78 /96 /82 /81 /95 /90 /i255/103/93 /103/91/93 /84 /97 /i255/98/99/100 /i255/103/93 /103/91/93 /84 /97 /i255 /101 /100 /i255/103/93 /103/91/93 /84/97 /i255 /94 /95 /83 /92 /i255 /94 /90 /93 /84 /104 /97 /i255 /34 /43 /i255 /30 /31 /32 /33 /i255 /27 /43 /29 /39 /69 /35 /43 /29 /43 /106/i255 /39 /36 /40 /i255 /67 /61 /68 /i255 /30 /34 /35 /36 /37 /31 /38 /i255/51/29 /51/56/29 /43 /69 /49 /i255/85/59/71 /i255/51/29 /51/56/29 /43 /69 /49 /i255 /39 /36 /40 /i255 /87 /71 /i255/51/29 /51/56/29 /43 /69 /i255 /57 /43 /34/51/i255/58 /34 /32 /31 /36 /52 /i255 /34 /36 /i255/51/39/32 /32 /29 /43 /69 /i255 /37 /34 /36 /37 /29 /43 /36 /31 /36 /52 /i255 /39 /i255 /37 /34 /36 /32 /43 /39 /37 /32 /i255 /39 /57 /57 /29 /37 /32 /31 /36 /52 /i255 /39 /i255 /30 /34 /36 /69 /35 /38 /32 /39 /36 /32 /i255 /34 /43 /i255 /69 /35 /56 /30/34 /36 /69 /35 /38 /32 /39 /36 /32 /i255 /55 /28 /34 /i255 /28 /39 /69 /i255 /41 /43 /34 /58 /31 /40 /29 /40 /i255 /39/i255 /37 /39/51/41/39 /31 /52 /36 /i255 /37 /34 /36 /32 /43 /31 /56 /35 /32 /31 /34 /36 /45 /i255 /i255 /i255/i255 /27 /28 /29 /i255 /41 /43 /34 /58 /31 /69 /31 /34 /36 /69 /i255/34 /57 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /i255/42/43/40 /31 /36 /39 /36 /37 /29 /i255 /43 /29 /69 /32 /43 /31 /37 /32 /31 /36 /52 /i255 /30 /34 /35 /36 /37 /31 /38 /i255/51/29 /51/56/29 /43 /69 /i255 /57 /43 /34/51/i255/58 /34 /32 /31 /36 /52 /i255 /34 /36 /i255/51/39/32 /32 /29 /43 /69 /i255 /39 /57 /57 /29 /37 /32 /31 /36 /52 /i255 /37 /39/51/41/39 /31 /52 /36 /i255 /37 /34 /36 /32 /43 /31 /56 /35 /32 /34 /43 /69 /i255 /39 /41 /41 /38 /31 /29 /69 /i255 /32 /34 /i255 /39 /i255 /30 /34 /36 /69 /35 /38 /32 /39 /36 /32 /i255 /55 /28 /34 /69 /29 /i255 /37 /34 /36 /32 /43 /39/37 /32 /i255 /43 /29 /108 /35 /31 /43 /29 /69 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /i255 /30 /31 /32 /33 /i255 /30 /34 /35 /36 /37 /31 /38 /109 /69 /49 /i255/85/59/71 /109 /69 /49 /i255 /34 /43 /i255 /87 /71 /109 /69 /i255 /39 /41 /41 /43 /34 /58 /39 /38 /49 /i255 /39 /36 /40 /i255 /69 /41 /29 /37 /31 /57 /31 /29 /40 /i255 /69 /35 /56 /30 /34 /36 /69 /35 /38 /32 /39 /36 /32 /69 /45 /i255 /i255 /71 /i255 /37 /34 /36 /32 /43 /39 /37 /32 /i255 /55 /31 /32 /28 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /i255 /30 /31 /32 /33 /49 /i255/85/59/71 /49 /i255 /34 /43 /i255 /87 /71 /i255 /31 /69 /i255 /110 /36 /34 /55 /36 /i255 /39 /69 /i255 /39 /i255 /50 /30 /31 /32 /33 /i255 /30 /34 /36 /32 /43 /39 /37 /32 /45 /54 /i255 /i255 /27 /28 /29 /i255/42/43/40 /31 /36 /39 /36/37 /29 /i255 /29 /111 /37 /38 /35 /40 /29 /69 /i255 /39 /i255 /37 /34/51/41/29 /32 /31 /32 /31 /58 /29 /38 /33 /i255 /56 /31/40 /i255 /37 /34 /36 /32 /43 /39 /37 /32 /i255 /39 /55 /39 /43 /40 /29 /40 /i255 /32 /34 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /i255 /38 /34 /55 /29 /69 /32 /i255 /43 /29 /69 /41 /34 /36 /69 /31 /56 /38 /29 /i255 /56 /31 /40 /40 /29 /43 /45 /i255/i255 /27 /34 /i255 /39 /69 /69 /31 /69 /32 /i255/51/29/51/56/29 /43 /69 /i255 /34 /57 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /i255 /30 /31 /32 /33 /i255 /30 /34 /35 /36 /37 /31 /38 /49 /i255/85/59/71 /49 /i255 /39 /36 /40 /i255 /87 /71 /i255 /56 /29 /57 /34 /43 /29 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /33 /i255 /58 /34 /32 /29 /i255 /34 /36 /i255 /39 /i255/51/39/32 /32 /29 /43 /i255 /43 /29 /52 /39 /43 /40 /31 /36 /52 /i255 /39 /i255 /30 /31 /32 /33 /i255 /30 /34 /36 /32 /43 /39 /37 /32 /49 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /i255/42/43/40 /31 /36 /39 /36 /37 /29 /i255 /43 /29 /108 /35 /31 /43 /29 /69 /i255 /30 /31 /32 /33 /i255 /69 /32 /39 /57 /57 /i255 /32 /34 /i255 /41 /43 /29 /41 /39 /43 /29 /i255 /32 /28/31 /69 /i255 /43 /29 /41 /34 /43 /32 /i255 /55 /28 /31 /37 /28 /i255 /40 /31 /69 /37 /38 /34 /69 /29 /69 /i255 /37 /29 /43 /32 /39 /31/36 /i255 /31 /36 /57 /34 /43/51/39/32 /31 /34 /36 /i255 /39 /56 /34 /35 /32 /70 /i255 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /i255 /30 /34 /36 /69 /35 /38 /32 /39 /36 /32 /i255 /43 /29 /37 /29 /31 /58 /31 /36 /52 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /i255 /30 /31 /32 /33 /i255 /30 /34 /36 /32 /43 /39 /37 /32 /49 /i255 /39 /36 /40 /i255 /69 /41 /29 /37 /31 /57 /31 /29 /40 /i255 /69 /35 /56 /30 /34 /36 /69 /35 /38 /32 /39 /36 /32 /67 /69 /68 /i255 /55 /34 /43 /110 /31 /36 /52 /i255 /35 /36 /40 /29 /43 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /i255 /30 /31 /32 /33 /i255 /30 /34 /36 /32 /43 /39 /37 /32 /45 /i255 /i255 /i255
/112 /113 /114 /115 /116/117/118/119 /120 /115 /113 /i255 /119 /122/118 /119 /i255/117/123/124 /119 /i255 /125 /126 /i255 /127 /120 /124 /128 /129 /115 /124 /126 /127 /130/i255/131/i255 /44 /39/51/29/i255 /34 /57 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /i255 /41 /29 /43 /69 /34 /36 /49 /i255 /29 /36 /32 /31 /32 /33 /49 /i255 /34 /43 /i255 /34 /43 /52 /39 /36 /31 /132 /39 /32 /31 /34 /36 /i255 /67 /31 /45 /29 /45 /49 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /i255 /30 /34 /36 /69 /35 /38 /32 /39 /36 /32 /i255 /34 /43 /i255 /59 /35 /56 /30 /34 /36 /69 /35 /38 /32 /39 /36 /32 /68 /i255 /i255 /131 /i255 /44 /39/51/29/i255 /34 /57 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /i255 /30 /28 /31 /29 /57 /i255 /133 /111 /29 /37 /35 /32 /31 /58 /29 /i255/42/57/57 /31 /37 /29 /43 /134 /135 /43 /29 /69 /31 /40 /29 /36 /32 /i255 /131 /i255 /30 /28 /31 /29 /57 /i255/42/41/29 /43 /39 /32 /31 /36 /52 /i255/42/57/57 /31 /37 /29 /43 /i255 /i255 /131 /i255 /30 /28 /31 /29 /57 /i255 /53 /31 /36 /39 /36 /37 /31 /39 /38 /i255/42/57/57 /31 /37 /29 /43 /i255 /131 /i255 /30 /28 /39 /31 /43 /41 /29 /43 /69 /34 /36 /i255 /131 /i255 /71 /38 /38 /i255/51/29/51/56/29 /43 /69 /i255 /34 /57 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /i255 /136 /34 /39 /43 /40 /i255 /34 /57 /i255 /137 /31 /43 /29 /37 /32 /34 /43 /69 /i255 /131 /i255 /71 /38 /38 /i255 /41 /29 /43 /69 /34 /36 /69 /i255 /55 /28 /34 /i255 /34 /55 /36 /i255/51/34/43 /29 /i255 /32 /28 /39 /36 /i255 /63 /62/138/i255/34 /57 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /i255 /41 /29 /43 /69 /34 /36 /49 /i255 /29 /36 /32 /31 /32 /33 /49 /i255 /34 /43 /i255 /34 /43 /52 /39 /36 /31 /132 /39 /32 /31 /34 /36 /i255 /i255 /131 /i255 /44 /39/51/29/i255 /34 /57 /i255 /39 /36 /33 /i255 /37 /39/51/41/39 /31 /52 /36 /i255 /37 /34/51/51/31/32 /32 /29 /29 /i255 /34 /55 /36 /29 /40 /i255 /34 /43 /i255 /37 /34 /36 /32 /43 /34 /38 /38 /29 /40 /i255 /56 /33 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /i255 /41 /29 /43 /69 /34 /36 /49 /i255 /29 /36 /32 /31 /32 /33 /49 /i255 /34 /43 /i255 /34 /43 /52 /39 /36 /31 /132 /39 /32 /31 /34 /36 /i255 /i255
/139 /129 /126 /118 /124 /126 /i255 /128 /115/117/140/129/126 /119 /126 /i255 /119 /122 /126 /i255 /114 /115 /129 /129 /115/141/120/113 /142 /i255 /127 /120 /124 /128 /129 /115 /124 /123 /116 /126 /i255 /114 /115 /116/117/130/i255/i255 /143 /144 /145 /146 /147 /148 /149 /150 /145 /149 /151 /146 /152 /72/153 /i255 /154 /150/155/156/i255 /157 /158 /158 /159 /156 /146 /146 /i255 /i255 /i255
/160 /147 /148 /148 /i255 /154 /150/155/156/i255 /161 /162 /149 /148 /156 /i255 /163 /147 /146 /162 /145 /156 /146 /146 /i255 /157 /158 /158 /159 /156 /146 /146 /i255/143 /162 /149 /164 /i255/165 /149 /150/149 /156 /i255/166 /162 /167 /i255 /i255 /30 /28 /39 /31 /43 /41 /29 /43 /69 /34 /36 /i255/i255/i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /30 /28 /31 /29 /57 /i255 /133 /111 /29 /37 /35 /32 /31 /58 /29 /i255/42/57/57 /31 /37 /29 /43 /i255 /134 /i255 /135 /43 /29 /69 /31 /40 /29 /36 /32 /i255/i255/i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /30 /28 /31 /29 /57 /i255/42/41/29 /43 /39 /32 /31 /36 /52 /i255/42/57/57 /31 /37 /29 /43 /i255/i255/i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /30 /28 /31 /29 /57 /i255 /53 /31 /36 /39 /36 /37 /31 /39 /38 /i255/42/57/57 /31 /37 /29 /43 /i255/i255/i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /136 /34 /39 /43 /40 /i255 /34 /57 /i255 /137 /31 /43 /29 /37 /32 /34 /43 /69 /i255/i255/i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /66/34/43 /29 /i255 /32 /28 /39 /36 /i255 /63 /62/138/i255/31 /36 /32 /29 /43 /29 /69 /32 /i255 /34 /55 /36 /29 /43 /i255/i255/i255 /i255 /i255 /72 /i255 /50 /30 /34 /36 /69 /35 /38 /32 /39 /36 /32 /54 /i255/31 /69 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /i255 /41 /29 /43 /69 /34 /36 /49 /i255 /29 /36 /32 /31 /32 /33 /49 /i255 /34 /43 /i255 /34 /43 /52 /39 /36 /31 /132 /39 /32 /31 /34 /36 /i255 /32 /28 /39 /32 /i255 /31 /69 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /i255 /41 /39 /43 /32 /33 /49 /i255 /34 /43 /i255 /41 /43 /34 /69 /41 /29 /37 /32 /31 /58 /29 /i255 /41 /39 /43 /32 /33 /49 /i255 /32 /34 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /i255 /37 /34 /36 /32 /43 /39 /37 /32 /i255 /55 /31 /32 /28 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /i255 /30 /31 /32 /33 /49 /i255/85/59/71 /49 /i255 /34 /43 /i255 /87 /71 /45 /i255 /i255 /i255 /168 /36 /i255 /39 /40 /40 /31 /32 /31 /34 /36 /i255 /32 /34 /i255 /32 /28/29 /i255 /36 /39/51/29/i255 /34 /57 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /i255 /41 /29 /43 /69 /34 /36 /49 /i255 /34 /43 /i255 /29 /36 /32 /31/32 /33 /49 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /i255 /30 /34 /36 /69 /35 /38 /32 /39 /36 /32 /i255/51/35/69 /32 /i255 /39 /38 /69 /34 /i255 /40 /31 /69 /37 /38 /34 /69 /29 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /i255 /36 /39/51/29/67 /69 /68 /i255 /34 /57 /i255 /32 /28 /39 /32 /i255 /41 /29 /43 /69 /34 /36 /109 /69 /49 /i255 /29 /36 /32 /31 /32 /33 /109 /69 /49 /i255 /34 /43 /i255 /34 /43 /52 /39 /36 /31 /132 /39 /32 /31 /34 /36 /109 /69 /i255 /136 /34 /39 /43 /40 /i255 /34 /57 /i255 /137 /31 /43 /29 /37 /32 /34 /43 /69 /49 /i255 /31 /32 /69 /i255 /30 /28 /39 /31 /43 /41 /29 /43 /69 /34 /36 /49 /i255 /30/28 /31 /29 /57 /i255 /133 /111 /29 /37 /35 /32 /31 /58 /29 /i255 /42/57/57 /31 /37 /29 /43 /49 /i255 /30 /28 /31 /29 /57 /i255 /53 /31 /36 /39 /36 /37 /31 /39 /38 /i255/42/57/57 /31 /37 /29 /43 /49 /i255 /30 /28 /31 /29 /57 /i255/42/41/29 /43 /39 /32 /31 /36 /52 /i255/42/57/57 /31 /37 /29 /43 /49 /i255 /39 /36 /33 /i255 /41 /29 /43 /69 /34 /36 /i255 /55 /31 /32 /28 /i255 /39 /36 /i255 /34 /55 /36 /29 /43 /69 /28 /31 /41 /i255 /31 /36 /32 /29 /43 /29 /69 /32 /i255 /34 /57 /i255/51/34/43 /29 /i255 /32 /28 /39 /36 /i255 /32 /29 /36 /i255 /41 /29 /43 /37 /29 /36 /32 /i255 /67 /63 /62/138/68/i255 /31 /36 /i255 /32 /28 /39 /32 /i255 /41 /29 /43 /69 /34 /36 /49 /i255 /29 /36 /32 /31 /32 /33 /49 /i255 /34 /43 /i255 /34 /43 /52 /39 /36 /31 /132 /39 /32 /31 /34 /36 /49 /i255 /39 /36 /40 /i255 /39 /36 /33 /i255 /37 /39/51/41/39 /31 /52 /36 /i255 /37 /34/51/51/31/32 /32 /29 /29 /i255 /32 /28 /39 /32 /i255 /31 /69 /i255 /34 /55 /36 /29 /40 /i255 /34 /43 /i255 /37 /34 /36 /32 /43 /34 /38 /38 /29 /40 /i255 /56 /33 /i255 /32 /28 /39 /32 /i255 /41 /29 /43 /69 /34 /36 /49 /i255 /29 /36 /32 /31 /32 /33 /49 /i255 /34 /43 /i255 /34 /43 /52 /39 /36 /31 /132 /39 /32 /31 /34 /36 /45 /i255 /i255 /135 /38 /29 /39 /69 /29 /i255 /40 /31 /69 /37 /38 /34 /69 /29 /i255 /32 /28 /29 /69 /29 /i255 /41 /29 /43 /69 /34 /36 /69 /109 /i255 /36 /39/51/29/i255 /39 /36 /40 /i255 /56 /35 /69 /31 /36 /29 /69 /69 /i255 /39 /40 /40 /43 /29 /69 /69 /45 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255/i255
Psomas
N/A
See attached
Steve Margaroni
Nick Tarditti
N/A
N/A
865 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3200, Los Angeles, CA 90017 865 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3200 Los Angeles CA 90017 865 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3200 Los Angeles CA 90017 58 of 745

/i255
/i255
/2 /3 /i255
/i255
/i255
/5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /6 /12 /13 /14 /10 /13 /15 /11 /16 /17 /17 /18 /i255 /20 /14/21/22/i255 /23 /24 /24 /25 /22 /11 /11 /i255
/i255 /i255
/26 /6 /12 /12 /i255 /20 /14/21/22/i255 /27 /28 /13 /12 /22 /i255 /29 /6 /11 /28 /10 /22 /11 /11 /i255 /23 /24 /24 /25 /22 /11 /11 /i255/8 /28 /13 /30 /i255 /5 /13 /14 /13 /22 /i255/31 /28 /32 /i255 /i255 /33 /34 /35 /36 /37 /38 /39 /37 /40 /41 /42/i255/i255 /i255/i255 /i255 /i255 /33 /34 /36 /39 /43 /i255 /44 /45 /39 /46 /47 /48 /36 /49 /39 /i255/50/43/43 /36 /46 /39 /37 /i255 /51 /i255 /52 /37 /39 /40 /36 /53 /39 /42 /48 /i255/i255 /i255/i255 /i255 /i255 /33 /34 /36 /39 /43 /i255/50/38/39 /37 /35 /48 /36 /42 /54 /i255/50/43/43 /36 /46 /39 /37 /i255/i255 /i255/i255 /i255 /i255 /33 /34 /36 /39 /43 /i255 /55 /36 /42 /35 /42 /46 /36 /35 /56 /i255/50/43/43 /36 /46 /39 /37 /i255/i255 /i255/i255 /i255 /i255 /57 /41 /35 /37 /53 /i255 /41 /43 /i255 /58 /36 /37 /39 /46 /48 /41 /37 /40 /i255/i255 /i255/i255 /i255 /i255 /59/41/37 /39 /i255 /48 /34 /35 /42 /i255 /60 /61/62/i255/36 /42 /48 /39 /37 /39 /40 /48 /i255 /41 /63 /42 /39 /37 /i255/i255 /i255/i255 /i255 /17 /17 /i255 /64 /65 /47 /66 /33 /41 /42 /40 /47 /56/48 /35 /42 /48 /67 /i255 /36 /40 /i255 /48 /34 /39 /i255 /38 /39 /37 /40 /41 /42 /68 /i255 /39 /42 /48 /36 /48 /69 /68 /i255 /41 /37 /i255 /41 /37 /54 /35 /42 /36 /70 /35 /48 /36 /41 /42 /i255 /48 /34 /35 /48 /i255 /34 /35 /40 /i255 /39 /42 /48 /39 /37 /39 /53 /i255 /36 /42 /48 /41 /i255 /35 /i255 /46 /41 /42 /48 /37 /35 /46 /48 /i255 /43 /41 /37 /i255 /48 /34 /39 /i255 /38 /39 /37 /43 /41 /37/71/35/42 /46 /39 /i255 /41 /43 /i255 /35 /56 /56 /i255 /41 /37 /i255 /35 /i255 /38 /41 /37 /48 /36 /41 /42 /i255 /41 /43 /i255 /48 /34 /39 /i255 /63 /41 /37 /72 /i255 /47 /42 /53 /39 /37 /48 /35 /72 /39 /42 /i255 /47 /42 /53 /39 /37 /i255 /35 /42 /i255 /35 /54 /37 /39 /39/71/39/42 /48 /i255 /63 /36 /48 /34/i255 /35 /42 /i255 /35 /37 /46 /34 /36 /48 /39 /46 /48 /68 /i255 /53 /39 /40 /36 /54 /42 /i255 /38 /37 /41 /43 /39 /40 /40/36 /41 /42 /35 /56 /68 /i255 /39 /42 /54 /36 /42 /39 /39 /37 /68 /i255 /41 /37 /i255 /54 /39 /42 /39 /37 /35 /56 /i255 /41 /37 /i255 /38 /37 /36/71/39/i255 /46 /41 /42 /48 /37 /35 /46 /48 /68 /i255 /47 /40 /47 /35 /56 /56 /69 /i255 /66 /69 /i255 /35 /i255 /54 /39 /42 /39 /37 /35 /56 /i255 /41 /37 /i255 /38 /37 /36/71/39/i255 /33 /41 /42 /40 /47 /56 /48 /35 /42 /48 /73 /i255 /i255 /74 /41 /47 /i255/71/47/40 /48 /i255 /35 /56 /40 /41 /i255 /53 /36 /40 /46 /56 /41 /40 /39 /i255 /48 /34 /39 /i255 /42 /35/71/39/40 /i255 /41 /43 /i255 /48 /34 /39 /i255 /65 /47 /66 /33 /41 /42 /40 /47 /56 /48 /35 /42 /48 /75 /40 /i255 /57 /41 /35 /37 /53 /i255 /41 /43/i255 /58 /36 /37 /39 /46 /48 /41 /37 /40 /68 /i255 /36 /48 /40 /i255 /33 /34 /35 /36 /37 /38 /39 /37 /40 /41 /42 /68 /i255 /33/34 /36 /39 /43 /i255 /44 /45 /39 /46 /47 /48 /36 /49 /39 /i255 /50 /43 /43 /36 /46 /39 /37 /68 /i255 /33 /34 /36 /39 /43 /i255 /55 /36 /42 /35 /42 /46 /36 /35 /56 /i255 /50 /43 /43 /36 /46 /39 /37 /68 /i255 /33 /34 /36 /39 /43 /i255 /50 /38 /39 /37 /35 /48 /36 /42 /54 /i255 /50 /43 /43 /36 /46 /39 /37 /68 /i255 /35 /42 /69 /i255 /38 /39 /37 /40 /41 /42 /i255 /63 /36 /48 /34 /i255 /35 /42 /i255 /41 /63 /42 /39 /37 /40 /34 /36 /38 /i255 /36 /42 /48 /39 /37 /39 /40 /48 /i255 /41 /43 /i255/71/41/37 /39 /i255 /48 /34 /35 /42 /i255 /48 /39 /42 /i255 /38 /39 /37 /46 /39 /42 /48 /i255 /76 /60 /61/62/77/i255 /36 /42 /i255 /48 /34 /35 /48 /i255 /38 /39 /37 /40 /41 /42 /68 /i255 /39 /42 /48 /36 /48 /69 /68 /i255 /41/37 /i255 /41 /37 /54 /35 /42 /36 /70 /35 /48 /36 /41 /42 /68 /i255 /35 /42 /53 /i255 /35 /42 /69 /i255 /46 /35/71/38/35 /36 /54 /42 /i255 /46 /41/71/71/36/48 /48 /39 /39 /i255 /48 /34 /35 /48 /i255 /36 /40 /i255 /41 /63 /42 /39 /53 /i255 /41 /37 /i255 /46 /41 /42 /48 /37 /41 /56 /56 /39 /53 /i255 /66 /69 /i255 /48 /34 /35 /48 /i255 /38 /39 /37 /40 /41 /42 /68 /i255 /39 /42 /48 /36 /48 /69 /68 /i255 /41 /37 /i255 /41 /37 /54 /35 /42 /36 /70 /35 /48 /36 /41 /42 /73 /i255 /i255 /78 /66 /41 /49 /39 /i255 /38 /56 /39 /35 /40 /39 /i255 /53 /36 /40 /46 /56 /41 /40 /39 /i255 /48 /34 /39 /40 /39 /i255 /38 /39 /37 /40 /41 /42 /40 /75 /i255 /42 /35/71/39/i255 /35 /42 /53 /i255 /66 /47 /40 /36 /42 /39 /40 /40 /i255 /35 /53 /53 /37 /39 /40 /40 /73 /i255 /i255 /i255 /33 /35/71/38/35 /36 /54 /42 /i255 /33 /41 /71/71/36/48 /48 /39 /39 /i255 /41 /63 /42 /39 /53 /i255 /41 /37 /i255 /46 /41 /42 /48 /37 /41 /56 /56 /39 /53 /i255 /66 /69 /79 /i255/i255/i255 /i255/i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255/i255/i255/i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255/i255/i255 /i255 /i255 /i255
/27 /28 /13 /12 /22 /i255 /29 /6 /11 /28 /10 /22 /11 /11 /i255 /23 /24 /24 /25 /22 /11 /11 /i255/8 /28 /13 /30 /i255 /5 /13 /14 /13 /22 /i255/31 /28 /32 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255/i255 /i255
/i255
/8 /80 /81 /27 /82 /26 /82 /8 /23 /27 /82/83/20/i255/i255 /50/42/i255 /66 /39 /34 /35 /56 /43 /i255 /41 /43 /i255 /48 /34 /39/i255 /35 /66 /41 /49 /39 /84 /42 /35/71/39/53 /i255/i255/33 /41 /42 /40 /47 /56 /48 /35 /42 /48 /i255/i255/65 /47 /66 /33 /41 /42 /40 /47 /56 /48 /35 /42 /48 /79 /i255/i255 /86 /i255 /87 /i255 /35 /46 /72 /42 /41 /63 /56 /39/53 /54 /39 /i255 /48 /34 /35 /48 /i255 /87 /i255 /34 /35 /49 /39 /i255 /35 /i255 /46 /41 /42 /48 /36 /42 /47 /36 /42 /54 /i255 /41 /66 /56 /36 /54 /35 /48 /36 /41 /42 /i255 /48 /41 /i255 /47 /38 /53 /35 /48 /39 /i255 /48 /34 /36 /40 /i255 /53 /36 /40 /46 /56 /41 /40 /47 /37 /39 /i255 /43 /41 /37/71/i255/36 /43 /i255 /87 /i255 /40 /47 /66 /40 /48 /36 /48 /47 /48 /39/88/i255/41 /37 /i255 /36 /43 /i255 /87 /i255 /40 /39 /56 /39 /46 /48 /i255 /35 /53 /53 /36 /48 /36 /41 /42 /35 /56 /88/i255 /35 /37 /46/34 /36 /48 /39 /46 /48 /40 /68 /i255 /53 /39 /40 /36 /54 /42 /i255 /38 /37 /41 /43 /39 /40 /40 /36 /41 /42/35 /56 /40 /68 /i255 /33 /41 /42 /40 /47 /56 /48 /35 /42 /48 /40 /68 /i255 /41 /37 /i255 /40 /47 /66 /33 /41 /42 /40 /47 /56 /48 /35 /42 /48 /40 /i255 /63 /36 /48 /34 /36 /42 /i255 /48 /39 /42 /i255 /76 /60 /61 /77 /i255 /53 /35 /69 /40 /i255 /41 /43 /i255 /48 /34 /39 /i255 /40 /39 /56 /39 /46 /48 /36 /41 /42 /i255 /41 /37 /i255 /46 /34 /35 /42 /54 /39 /89 /i255 /35 /42 /53 /i255/i255 /86 /i255 /87 /i255 /34 /39 /37 /39 /66 /69 /i255 /46/39 /37 /48 /36 /43 /69 /i255 /48 /34 /35 /48 /79 /i255 /90/i255/87/i255 /34 /35 /49 /39/i255 /36 /53 /39 /42 /48 /36 /43 /36 /39 /53 /i255 /35 /56 /56 /i255 /38 /39 /37 /40 /41 /42 /40 /i255 /43 /41 /37 /i255 /63 /34 /36 /46 /34 /i255 /48 /34 /39 /i255/50/37/53 /36 /42 /35 /42 /46 /39 /i255 /37 /39 /91 /47 /36 /37 /39 /40 /i255 /53 /36 /40 /46 /56 /41 /40 /47 /37 /39 /89 /i255 /90/i255/92/34 /39 /i255 /36 /42/43 /41 /37/71/35/48 /36 /41 /42 /i255 /36 /42 /i255 /48 /34 /36 /40 /i255 /53 /36 /40 /46 /56 /41 /40 /47 /37 /39 /i255 /43 /41 /37/71/i255/76 /35 /42 /53 /i255 /35 /42 /69 /i255 /35 /48 /48 /35 /46 /34/71/39/42 /48 /i255 /48 /41 /i255 /48 /34 /36 /40 /i255 /43 /41 /37/71/77/i255 /36 /40 /i255 /48 /37 /47 /39 /68 /i255 /35 /46 /46 /47 /37 /35 /48 /39 /68 /i255 /46 /41 /37 /37 /39 /46 /48 /68 /i255 /35 /42 /53 /i255 /46 /41/71/38/56 /39 /48 /39 /89 /i255 /35 /42 /53 /i255 /90/i255/87/i255 /34 /35 /49 /39/i255 /66 /39 /39 /42 /i255 /56 /39 /54 /35 /56 /56 /69 /i255 /35 /47 /48 /34 /41 /37 /36 /70 /39 /53 /i255 /48 /41 /i255 /40 /47 /66/71/36/48 /i255 /48 /34 /36 /40 /i255 /53 /36 /40 /46 /56 /41 /40 /47 /37 /39 /i255 /43 /41 /37/71/73/i255 /i255
/87 /42 /i255 /48 /41 /48 /35 /56 /68 /i255 /48 /34 /36 /40 /i255 /53 /36 /40 /46/56 /41 /40 /47 /37 /39 /i255 /43 /41 /37/71/i255/76 /36 /42 /46 /56 /47 /53 /36 /42 /54 /i255 /35 /48 /48 /35 /46 /34/71/39/42 /48 /40 /77 /i255 /36 /40 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /38 /35 /54 /39 /40 /73 /i255 /i255
/44 /45 /39 /46 /47 /48 /39 /53 /i255 /41 /42 /79 /i255 /i255 /i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /68 /i255 /93 /61 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /68 /i255 /35 /48 /79 /i255 /i255/i255/i255/i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/68 /i255 /33 /35 /56 /36 /43 /41 /37 /42 /36 /35 /73 /i255 /i255
/65 /36 /54 /42 /35 /48 /47 /37 /39 /79 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /52 /37 /36 /42 /48 /i255 /55 /47 /56 /56 /i255 /94 /35/71/39/79 /i255/i255 /i255/i255/i255/i255/i255 /i255/i255/i255 /i255/i255
/78 /53 /53 /37 /39 /40 /40 /79 /i255/i255 /i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255/i255 /i255
/52 /34 /41 /42 /39 /i255 /94 /47/71/66/39 /37 /79 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255/i255/44 /84/71/35/36 /56 /i255 /78 /53 /53 /37 /39 /40 /40 /79 /i255/i255 /i255/i255/i255/i255/i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255/i255/i255 5 March 20
26 Santa Ana
Maira Salcedo
5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 300, Santa Ana, CA 92707
714.781.8008
[email protected]
59 of 745

5d
26-89975

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Professional Services Agreement with Self Insured Services Company, LLC dba Benefit Coordinators Corporation for BenXcel and Benefits Administration Services

1. Motion Authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Self Insured Services Company, LLC dba Benefit Coordinators Corporation (BCC) for BenXcel online benefits administration and related services for a five (5) year term beginning October 1, 2026, with two (2) one-year options to extend for a total of seven (7) years, with an annual not-to-exceed amount of $150,000 for Years 1-4 and $155,000 for Year 5 and any optional extensions (subject to annual appropriation).

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for June 23, 2026 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff requests Council authorization to enter into a five-year Professional Services Agreement with Self Insured Services Company, LLC dba Benefit Coordinators Corporation (BCC) to continue operation of the BenXcel benefits administration platform and related services for the City’s medical benefits. BCC/BenXcel was implemented on October 1, 2024, following a competitive broker procurement process and has since demonstrated reliable performance in administering employee benefits, carrier integrations, COBRA services, and consolidated billing functions. Entering into a long- term agreement will provide operational stability, avoid costly system replacement and implementation efforts, prevent disruption to employee benefit administration, and secure favorable rate protections for the City. The annual not-to-exceed cost for these services is $150,000 for Years 1-4 and $155,000 for Year 5 and any optional extensions .

RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with BCC for BenXcel online benefits administration and related services for a five year term beginning October 1, 2026, with two one-year options to extend, and with an annual not-to-exceed amount of $150,000 for Years 1-4 and $155,000 for Year 5 and any optional extensions (subject to annual appropriation).
60 of 745

5d2
26-89975
6 7
9 8

ANALYSIS
In December 2023, the City conducted a competitive procurement for Insurance Broker of Record services and awarded a contract to Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. As part of the solicitation, proposers were required to identify and negotiate services and fees with a qualified Third-Party Administrator (TPA) to provide comprehensive benefits administration services, including eligibility management, data integration, consolidated billing and remittance, COBRA administration, Medicare eligibility tracking, participant support, and related functions.

Alliant's proposal identified Benefit Coordinators Corporation (BCC) as its TPA partner for these services. Following the award, the City worked with Alliant and BCC to implement the BenXcel benefits administration platform. Implementation began in 2024 and involved extensive system configuration, data mapping, and integration with the City's MUNIS system and benefit carriers, including Anthem, Kaiser, Guardian, VSP, and Voya. The platform was successfully implemented and went live on October 1, 2024, under an initial one-year Professional Services Agreement, followed by a second one-year agreement for FY 2025-26.

During this two-year operational period, the City evaluated the platform's performance in a live production environment and confirmed that it met City standards for data integrity, processing accuracy, carrier connectivity, and user experience. BCC/BenXcel has consistently demonstrated reliable performance in administering eligibility transactions, consolidated billing, COBRA services, and flexible spending account administration.

Based on the successful implementation and demonstrated operational stability of the platform, staff recommends entering into a multi-year Professional Services Agreement with BCC.

The proposed agreement establishes a long-term framework for continued benefits administration services, providing operational continuity, vendor stability, and predictable costs. Under the negotiated terms, BCC will provide services for an initial five-year term beginning October 1, 2026, with two optional one-year extensions, for a total potential contract term of seven years. In addition, the City negotiated favorable pricing protections that will help control future administrative costs:
• Four-Year Rate Guarantee: BCC will maintain its current administrative rates for the first four years of the agreement (October 1, 2026, through September 30, 2030), eliminating annual rate increases during that period.
• Limited Year Five Adjustment and Fee Cap: Beginning October 1, 2030 (Year 5), the agreement permits a modest rate adjustment and increase to the annual fee cap of $155,000. This maximum cap would also apply during any optional extension periods exercised by the City.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
The primary stakeholders are City of Glendale employees who rely on the BenXcel platform for medical benefit management. Outreach regarding benefits enrollment is 61 of 745

5d3
26-89975
6 7
9 8
conducted through internal City portals, department-wide emails, and annual benefits orientations.

FISCAL IMPACT
The annual not-to-exceed amount of $150,000 was included in the HR Department’s Proposed FY 2026-27 budget. Because the rate guarantee keeps costs flat at the current spending level for the first four years, the increased fee cap of $155,000 is only anticipated to begin in Year 5 to absorb minimal programmatic increases.

Proposed FY 2026-27 Appropriation
Amount: Account String: Funding Source:
$150,000 43110-6160-HRD-0010-P0000 Medical Insurance Fund Department Cost Center Programs
Human
Resources
Administration

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
This item is exempt from CEQA/NEPA requirements as it is an administrative activity.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION

1. Council may direct staff to conduct a competitive solicitation for benefits administration services. This approach would require a new procurement process and subsequent system implementation, including data conversion, carrier integrations, employee training, and transition activities, which could increase administrative costs and create potential disruptions to benefits administration services.

2.Council may approve a shorter-term agreement. While this option would provide greater flexibility to revisit the service arrangement sooner, it may limit the City's ability to secure long-term pricing protections and operational stability.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Paula Adams, Chief Human Resources Officer
Prepared by:

Aymee Martin, Assistant Director of Human Resources
62 of 745

5d4
26-89975
6 7
9 8
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
63 of 745

c:\pgcompilerservicerelease\temp\glendale\62604\17426\1.doc

M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member ____________________, seconded by Council Member ________________, that the Council hereby authorizes the City Manager or his designee to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Self Insured Services Company, LLC dba Benefit Coordinators Corporation (BCC) for BenXcel online benefits administration and related services for a five year term beginning October 1, 2026 with two one-year options to extend the agreement, in an amount not to exceed $150,000 for years 1-4, and $155,000 for year 5 and any optional extensions, subject to annual appropriation. Said Professional Services Agreement shall be subject to the review and approval as to form by the City Attorney.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
64 of 745

5e
26-89974

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Professional Services Agreement with Glendale Adventist Medical Center dba Adventist Health Glendale to provide occupational medical services for the City of Glendale

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for June 23, 2026 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Glendale requires specialized occupational medical services to ensure that its workforce, particularly public safety and field personnel, is medically fit for duty and compliant with state and federal regulations. The City has utilized Glendale Adventist Occupational Medicine Center (GAOMC) for these services since 2009. This report recommends renewing the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with GAOMC for a five-year term with two one-year options to extend (2026–2033) to maintain service continuity and high-quality medical oversight for City employees.

The proposed agreement includes pre-placement physical examinations, regulatory medical examinations, drug and alcohol testing, fitness-for-duty evaluations, return-to- work assessments, and other occupational medical services necessary to support employee health, safety, and regulatory compliance. The annual not-to-exceed amount for these services is $200,000.
65 of 745

5e2
26-89974
6 7
9 7

RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the City Manager to execute a PSA with GAOMC dba Adventist Health Glendale to provide occupational medical services including, but not limited to, pre- placement physical examinations, regulatory examinations mandated by Cal-OSHA, return-to-work evaluations, and fitness for duty examinations for the City employees for a five year term beginning November 1, 2026, with two one-year options to extend, and with an annual not-to-exceed amount of $200,000 (subject to annual appropriation).

ANALYSIS
In 2009, the City transitioned from an in-house employee health model to a contracted occupational medicine model following a competitive Request for Proposals (RFP) process. Glendale Adventist Occupational Medicine Center (GAOMC) was selected based on its specialized expertise in occupational health services and its ability to meet the City's public-sector workforce needs. In 2021, City Council approved a subsequent agreement extending these services. Throughout the current contract term, GAOMC has consistently provided reliable medical evaluations and occupational health services that support employee safety, workforce readiness, and regulatory compliance. The current agreement expires on October 31, 2026. Staff recommend a new five-year agreement with two one-year options to extend, which could continue services through October 31, 2033.

The scope of the proposed agreement ensures employees are medically fit for employment and maintains compliance with state and federal mandates. The services include, but are not limited to:
Pre-placement physicals (sworn and non-sworn) consistent with P.O.S.T. and City standards.
Mandatory regulatory and periodic examinations to meet DOT and Cal/OSHA and ongoing department compliance requirements.
DOT-qualified drug & alcohol testing, chain of custody, and Medical Review Officer (MRO) coordination.
Pre-employment and promotional, random, and reasonable-suspicion testing. Fitness-for-duty and return-to-work evaluations with written clinical recommendations.
Workers’ compensation medical evaluations and treatment coordination. Urgent occupational medical evaluation support as needed. Timely, secure transmission of medical reports and monthly/quarterly utilization and compliance reports.

Occupational medicine is a highly specialized field requiring expertise in employment- related medical evaluations, regulatory compliance, and safety-sensitive positions. 66 of 745

5e3
26-89974
6 7
9 7
GAOMC is uniquely qualified to serve the City's workforce, including Police, Fire, and other employees whose duties require specialized medical screening and ongoing fitness-for-duty assessments. Continuing this long-standing partnership will preserve institutional knowledge, maintain service continuity, and ensure uninterrupted compliance with applicable health and safety regulations.

GAOMC's staff possesses extensive knowledge of state regulatory requirements, including Peace Officer Standards and Training (P.O.S.T.) medical standards, allowing examinations to be completed efficiently and in accordance with academy and certification timelines. Additionally, the clinic's location at 600 S. Glendale Avenue provides convenient access for employees, reducing travel time and minimizing operational disruption when medical evaluations or treatment are required.

Staff does not anticipate any significant changes to GAOMC's fee schedule during the contract term. Based on preliminary discussions, service rates are expected to remain substantially consistent with current pricing, allowing the annual not-to-exceed amount to remain at $200,000 throughout the initial term and any option years. This stability provides cost predictability and reflects the value of the City's long-standing partnership with GAOMC.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
N/A

FISCAL IMPACT
The annual not-to-exceed amount of $200,000 was included in the HR Department’s Proposed FY 2026-27 budget.

FY 2026-27 Proposed Appropriation
Amount: Account String: Funding Source:
$200,000 43110-6140-HRD-5001-P0000 Compensation Insurance Fund
Department Cost Center Programs
Human
Resources
Employee Health Services

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
This item is exempt from CEQA/NEPA requirements as it is an administrative activity.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements. 67 of 745

5e4
26-89974
6 7
9 7

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION

1. The City Council may direct staff to conduct a competitive solicitation for occupational medical services. While this approach could provide an opportunity to evaluate alternative service providers, it may also result in a transition period requiring the transfer of institutional knowledge and implementation of new service delivery processes.

2. The City Council may approve a shorter-term agreement. While this option would reduce the contract term commitment, it would provide less long-term cost predictability and require staff to return to Council sooner for future contract authorization.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Paula Adams, Chief Human Resources Officer
Prepared by:

Aymee Martin, Assistant Director of Human Resources
Christie Story, Employee Health Coordinator
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
68 of 745

c:\pgcompilerservicerelease\temp\glendale\62604\17425\1.doc

M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member ____________________, seconded by Council Member ________________, that the Council hereby authorizes the City Manager or his designee to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Glendale Adventist Medical Center dba Adventist Health Glendale to provide occupational medical services for a period of five years, beginning November 1, 2026, with two additional one-year options to extend the agreement, in an amount not to exceed $200,000, subject annual appropriation. Said Professional Services Agreement shall be subject to the review and approval as to form by the City Attorney.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
69 of 745

5f
26-90050

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Escheatment for Unclaimed Checks and Deposits

1. Motion to escheat unclaimed checks and deposits held by various City funds pursuant to Government Code Sections 50050-50057.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for June 23, 2026 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On an annual basis, the Finance Departments presents the City Council a list of unclaimed property that meet the requirements mandated by Government Code Sections 50050-50057 to escheat funds. As required by the Government Code, the City has made multiple efforts to return these outstanding funds to their rightful owners by attempting to contact them through a variety of different means. Through these attempts, at the time of preparing this report on May 15, 2026, we have resolved forty- six outstanding checks totaling $65,796.67. We have also received forty-seven claim forms for outstanding deposits totaling $441,344.60, which were under review at the time this report was being prepared. After multiple outreach efforts, the remaining unclaimed property as of May 15, 2026, is $73,748.59 for outstanding checks and $645,730.00 for outstanding deposits. Claims continue to be accepted until today (June 23, 2026), and the actual remaining unclaimed property balance may be less due to additional claims received.
70 of 745

5f2
26-90050
6 8
2 2

RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the Director of Finance to escheat unclaimed checks and deposits held by various funds pursuant to Government Code Sections 50050-50057 and transfer the escheated funds into the general fund.

ANALYSIS
California Government Code Sections 50050-50057 provide the legal framework for local agencies to handle unclaimed funds, such as uncashed checks or unclaimed deposits. These laws allow local governments to take ownership of and transfer unclaimed money to their general fund after three years for funds over fifteen dollars ($15), following a defined public notification process. The notification process requires the list of unclaimed checks and deposits to be published as public notice once a week for two successive weeks in a local newspaper. Then any remaining unclaimed funds become the property of the City on a designated date not less than forty-five days nor more than sixty days after the first publication of the notice. Any individual check under fifteen dollars ($15) that remain unclaimed for one year can be transferred to the general fund without public notice.

Outstanding Checks:

In February 2026, Finance Department staff obtained a list of all outstanding checks from the City Treasurer’s office which included checks issued in 2022 and earlier. Staff, from multiple departments, and AdminSure, the City’s workers’ compensation third-party administrator, worked collectively to contact each payee to notify them of their unclaimed funds by phone, e-mail, and U.S. mail. Multiple attempts were made to contact each individual, after which the City per state requirements published the list of unclaimed funds in the local newspaper on May 7 and May 14, 2026. The City took additional measures, beyond the general requirements, by issuing a press release, posting notifications on the City’s website and the City’s different social media platforms.

In addition, with the help of Information Technology Department, the City launched a new online portal allowing claimants to search and submit a claim for their funds directly through the City’s online portal.

The outstanding checks can be reissued by Accounts Payable once a replacement check affidavit is submitted to the City Treasurer’s Office. Once the affidavit is reviewed and approved, the City Treasurer’s Office will then process a stop payment with the bank for the original check then forward the completed packet to Accounts Payable for a check to be reissued.

As of May 15, 2026, the date this report was prepared, staff were able to resolve forty- six outstanding checks totaling $65,796.67 with the remaining unclaimed checks being 179 checks, totaling $73,748.59.

In accordance with federal regulation Title 45, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Part 201, Subpart B, Section 201.67, if a check remains uncashed beyond a period of 180 days from the date it was issued, i.e., the date of the check, it will no longer be regarded as an amount expended because no funds have actually been disbursed. If the State (or local) agency 71 of 745

5f3
26-90050
6 8
2 2
has claimed and received Federal Financial Participation (FFP) for the amount of the uncashed check, it must refund the amount of FFP received. As of the date of this report being prepared, $34,685 of the uncashed checks falls within this federal regulation.

Outstanding Deposits:

Also in March 2026, Finance Department staff worked with Public Works and Community Development staff for the list of outstanding deposits. Public Works and Community Development staff contacted each payee through variety of methods including phone, e-mail, and U.S. Mail. Currently, there are forty unclaimed deposits in the amount of $25,800.00, which are associated with the Excavation Permits administered by Public Works Department. In addition to the forty unclaimed deposits, there are ninety-three unclaimed deposits in the amount of $619,930.00, which are associated with the Construction and Demolition (C&D) Debris Bond administered by Community Development Department.

To obtain excavation permit refund, applicants must submit an application. Public Works staff reviews the inspection document to verify the eligibility. Once all requirements are met, Public Works staff request the issuance of the refund through Accounts Payable.

To obtain a C&D Debris Bond refund, applicants must divert 65% of the project’s estimated debris to a certified mixed debris recycling facility and submit Waste Reduction and Recycling Plan Compliance Report within six months of certificate of occupancy. Community Development staff request the issuance of the refund through Accounts Payable once all the requirements are met.

Construction permits associated with the C&D Debris Bond deposits often remain active for more than three years. By the end of a five-year period from issuance, the permits are either expired, or construction projects are completed. Thus, C&D Debris Bond deposits older than five years are subject to the escheatment.

On July 30, 2019, Council approved the amendment of Chapter 8 of the Glendale Municipal Code, related to Construction and Demolition Debris, transferring enforcement, responsibility, and administration of the Ordinance from Public Works Department, Integrated Waste Management, to the Community Development Department, Building and Safety Division. The amendment applies to the C&D Debris Bond deposits processed subsequent to the adoption date. Six out of ninety-three outstanding C&D Debris Bond deposits in the amount of $104,900.00, were processed prior to the amendment adoption date, and thus, shall be retained by the City to promote waste diversion efforts in the community. (Ord. 5895 §1, 2017). The remaining eighty-seven outstanding C&D Debris Bond deposits in the amount of $515,030.00, shall be retained by the City in the General Fund.

After extensive outreach over the past few months, staff received forty-seven claim forms for unclaimed deposits totaling $441,344.60 as of May 15, 2026, the date this report was prepared. These forty-seven claims were being reviewed by CDD staff to verify refund 72 of 745

5f4
26-90050
6 8
2 2
eligibility, and refunds would be issued once the verification process is complete. The remaining one-hundred and thirty-three unclaimed deposits total $645,730.00.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
The City of Glendale has taken measures beyond the state minimum notification requirements utilizing variety of different outreach methods. First, City staff and AdminSure attempted to contact each payee directly by phone, e-mail, and U.S. mail.

Next, detailed notices were published in the Glendale Independent on May 7 and May 14, 2026. A press release was also published providing instructions on how to claim these funds by directing any party of interest to the City’s website and the City’s new unclaimed funds portal. Similar notices have also been posted on the City’s website and various social media platforms. Staff will continue to work with the public and accept any new claims until the timeframe per Government Code Section 50050-50057 is met and per City Council approval to escheat any remaining unclaimed funds.

FISCAL IMPACT
If approved by the Council, the escheated funds up to $719,478.59 will be transferred to the General Fund ($579,893.59), the Housing Assistance Fund ($34,685.00), and the Refuse Fund ($104,900.00). This amount is as of May 15, 2026, the date this report was prepared. The final escheated amount may be lowered based on the number of checks and deposits claimed between May 15, 2026, and the date of the City Council meeting this report is presented.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
This item is not subject to CEQA/NEPA review.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1: Do not authorize to escheat the checks and deposits held by various funds pursuant to Government Code Sections 50050-50057.
2: Consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Jack Liang, Director of Finance
Prepared by:

Steve Kwon, Accounts Payable Supervisor
Steve Kim, Accounting Supervisor
73 of 745

5f5
26-90050
6 8
2 2
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Outstanding checks and deposits to be escheated Exhibit 2: Copy of Press Release
Exhibit 3: Proof of publication in the Glendale Independent 74 of 745

1.docx
MOTION
Moved by Council Member ____________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that, pursuant to Government Code Sections 50050-50057, any escheated unclaimed property held in the general fund or any special fund is now property of the City, to be transferred to the general fund, as set forth in the Report to Council dated June 23, 2026.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
75 of 745

UNCLAIMED CHECKS & UNCLAIMED CASH BOND DEPOSITS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT, the Director of Finance of the City of Glendale, County of Los Angeles, State of California, declares that the following monetary sums have been held by the Director of Finance and have remained unclaimed in the funds hereaŌer indicated for a period of over three (3) years and will become the property of City of Glendale on the 30th day of June 2026, a date not less than forty-ﬁve (45) days nor more than sixty (60) days aŌer ﬁrst publicaƟon of this NoƟce. Any party of interest may, prior to the date designated herein above, ﬁle a claim with the City’s Finance Department, which includes the claimant’s name, address, amount of claim, and the grounds on which the claim is founded. The Unclaimed Check form & Unclaimed Deposit form can be obtained from the City’s Finance Department at 141 N Glendale Ave, Room 346, Glendale, CA 91206 or from the City’s website. Claims can also now be submiƩed through our online portal at hƩps://unclaimedproperty.glendaleca.gov/. For quesƟons regarding unclaimed checks, please contact the City of Glendale, Finance Department, Accounts Payable at (818) 548-3907. For quesƟons regarding unclaimed deposits, please contact City of Glendale, Finance Department, General AccounƟng at (818)548-3243.

This noƟce and its contents are in accordance with California Government Code SecƟons 50050-50056.

CHECK/RECEIPT # DATE PAYEE/DEPOSITOR AMOUNT TYPE
313282 02/28/2021 11136 MAGNOLIA LLC $7,500.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 314085 05/03/2021 1541 HILLCREST LLC $2,300.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 316904 05/24/2021 211 BRAND LLC $7,500.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 306208 07/20/2020 ACE DEMOLITION CORPORATION $876.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 309661 10/31/2020 ADELA GUTIERREZ $2,880.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 318031 06/22/2021 ADONIS DARAKJIAN ; S $2,940.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 314182 03/16/2021 ADRIAN CULICI $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 311451 12/31/2020 AGUSTIN GUERRERO $2,260.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 311452 12/31/2020 AGUSTIN GUERRERO $2,400.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 312936 02/28/2021 AIR SUPREME HEATING & AIR CONDITION $2,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 253278 12/29/2016 ALEKSANDR VOPYAN $7,500.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 315267 05/03/2021 ALINA KHACHATOURIAN $2,800.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 316978 05/24/2021 ALPHA OMEGA CONTRACT $17,850.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 316186 05/03/2021 AMANDA NOGUER $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 301173 03/31/2020 AMERICAN STEEL CONTRAC $2,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 251526 11/15/2016 ANNET ARAKELIAN $3,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 316517 05/12/2021 ANTRANIK DAVOODI ; A $2,400.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 309584 10/31/2020 ARC CONSTRUCTION INC. $9,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 309283 10/31/2020 ARIS SHAHMIRZAIAN $2,200.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 312672 01/31/2021 ARMEN AMIRYAN $3,700.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 295732 11/08/2019 ARMEN ARUTYUNYAN SR. $5,500.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 315751 04/26/2021 ARNOLD TECSON $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 316095 05/17/2021 ARNOLD TECSON $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 316713 05/17/2021 ARTHUR ARTOUNIAN $2,960.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 313508 02/28/2021 ARTHUR M. PETROUSIAN $1,300.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 311503 12/31/2020 ASHOT TOUNIAN $5,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 316484 05/10/2021 ATLAS LENS CO. $13,500.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 316175 05/03/2021 BASMADJYAN PROPERTIE $2,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 307298 08/31/2020 BELDERIAN ENTERPRISES, LLC ; A & B CONSTRUCTION CO. $15,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 265757 10/06/2017 BERGE GEORGE KARAGHOSSIAN $3,900.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 306242 07/31/2020 BEST WESTERN PLUMBING ; HARMIK SHAHIJANIAN $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 306708 08/31/2020 BEST WESTERN PLUMBING ; HARMIK SHAHIJANIAN $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 314631 05/03/2021 BOUCHARD COMMUNICATI $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 314631 05/03/2021 BOUCHARD COMMUNICATI $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 307048 08/31/2020 BRIAN SPENCE; BAM STUDIO DPC $5,580.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 307048 08/31/2020 BRIAN SPENCE; BAM STUDIO DPC $4,530.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 264401 09/06/2017 CALIFORNIA LAW FIRM $10,800.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 317289 06/02/2021 CATHERINE T DARGENZI $17,400.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 974901 06/16/2022 YEGHIA KARAKHANYAN $15.27 UNCLAIMED CHECK 980245 09/22/2022 HOVHANNES AGHABEKYAN $17.45 UNCLAIMED CHECK 313376 02/28/2021 CHARLES LINDSAY $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 76 of 745

313377 02/28/2021 CHARLES LINDSAY $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 315910 04/28/2021 CHARLES LINDSAY $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 315272 05/03/2021 CHARLES LINDSAY $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 315273 05/03/2021 CHARLES LINDSAY $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 315274 05/03/2021 CHARLES LINDSAY $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 316238 05/05/2021 CHARLES LINDSAY $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 317596 06/10/2021 CHARLES LINDSAY $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 980011 09/15/2022 TING ZHANG $17.87 UNCLAIMED CHECK
309304 10/31/2020 CHRIS R KENT $4,500.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 310385 11/30/2020 CHRIS R KENT $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 317811 06/17/2021 CHRISTINE CERDA $9,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 315225 05/03/2021 COMMUNITY SERVICES & $7,060.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 152515 11/17/2022 TINO SALOOMEN $18.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 315137 04/05/2021 CREATIVE INNOVATION $3,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 984832 12/15/2022 ARARAT FERAHYAN $18.06 UNCLAIMED CHECK 310582 11/30/2020 D & D ENGINEERING INC $2,400.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 310882 12/31/2020 DANIEL E KATZ; APRIL E FULTON $2,400.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 968995 03/01/2022 HERBERT MOLANO $18.30 UNCLAIMED CHECK 972852 05/05/2022 DONNY BAKER $18.47 UNCLAIMED CHECK
974893 06/16/2022 MARKEY FAMILY TRUST $18.92 UNCLAIMED CHECK 983498 11/22/2022 SILVA MORADI $19.41 UNCLAIMED CHECK
307470 08/31/2020 DEL AMO CONSTRUCTION INC $30,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 309153 10/31/2020 DEL AMO CONSTRUCTION INC $30,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 309153 10/31/2020 DEL AMO CONSTRUCTION INC $30,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 309153 10/31/2020 DEL AMO CONSTRUCTION INC $30,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 984604 12/08/2022 REMINEH BOGHOZIAN $19.98 UNCLAIMED CHECK 966165 01/13/2022 HANA MASSAB $20.47 UNCLAIMED CHECK
980000 09/15/2022 JIAYU LIU $21.83 UNCLAIMED CHECK
969116 03/03/2022 JERRY CARROLL REDMAN $22.63 UNCLAIMED CHECK 318318 06/29/2021 DISNEY WORLDWIDE SER $6,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 315827 04/26/2021 DISQO $10,500.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT
971002 04/05/2022 THE ATMOSPHERE $22.63 UNCLAIMED CHECK 315459 04/12/2021 DOMINIQUE MARTINEZ; $3,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 966589 01/27/2022 PARIZAD KESHISH $22.86 UNCLAIMED CHECK 971643 04/21/2022 201 OWNER LLC $24.36 UNCLAIMED CHECK 315666 05/03/2021 DR. HAMLET S. AVANES $3,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 983353 11/17/2022 STEVEN SKIPP $24.50 UNCLAIMED CHECK
317757 06/17/2021 EDMOND DENTAL LAB, I $3,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 147947 05/11/2022 LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA $24.56 UNCLAIMED CHECK 309892 11/30/2020 ELENA MARTHA SOLOIAN $3,800.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 976230 07/12/2022 SONYA KALASHYAN $25.99 UNCLAIMED CHECK 979999 09/15/2022 JACQUELINE MIKAELIAN $26.48 UNCLAIMED CHECK 307431 08/31/2020 ELLADA SAFARYAN $11,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 970584 03/24/2022 DEREK VAIL $27.27 UNCLAIMED CHECK
969627 03/17/2022 DENNIS CRUZ $27.61 UNCLAIMED CHECK
312814 02/28/2021 EVET BARSEGHIAN $2,400.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 312091 01/31/2021 EVLYN AVANESSIAN, MD, INC. $4,500.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 973387 05/19/2022 MARAT ASATRYAN $27.80 UNCLAIMED CHECK 306277 07/31/2020 FJS CABLE ENGINEERING INC $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 306766 08/31/2020 FJS CABLE ENGINEERING INC $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 147873 05/09/2022 TOBY DARBY $28.31 UNCLAIMED CHECK
982852 11/03/2022 DONALD TAYLOR $28.53 UNCLAIMED CHECK 306134 07/20/2020 G S CONSTRUCTION $3,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 314274 03/15/2021 GABRIELA IMRE-ANGEL $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 306905 08/31/2020 GABRIELLA IMRE-ANGEL $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 308748 10/31/2020 GALSTYAN LAW FIRM, P.C. $7,200.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 979164 08/25/2022 BIANCA AZEVEDO $28.73 UNCLAIMED CHECK 973114 05/12/2022 GERALDINE GAREZA $30.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 972557 04/28/2022 DAVIT HAYRAPETYAN $30.80 UNCLAIMED CHECK 976120 07/07/2022 JAMIEL TRIMBLE $32.57 UNCLAIMED CHECK 313241 02/28/2021 GLENDALE CATERING, INC. $7,950.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 77 of 745

974880 06/16/2022 CHANTAL KING $32.97 UNCLAIMED CHECK
311400 12/31/2020 GLENDALE HOLDINGS, LLC $24,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 317633 06/10/2021 GOHAR A. ABOLIAN $2,500.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 315929 04/28/2021 GT CONSTRUCTION GROU $300.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 971405 04/14/2022 RUZANNA KARAPETYAN $34.22 UNCLAIMED CHECK 309566 10/31/2020 HABIBA MANJOUR $2,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 980242 09/22/2022 CECILIA COSME $34.35 UNCLAIMED CHECK 147210 04/13/2022 CONOR BROWN $35.80 UNCLAIMED CHECK
308971 10/31/2020 HAYTHAM FARAJ $3,600.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 980009 09/15/2022 ROSALINA QUINTEROS $36.11 UNCLAIMED CHECK 312100 01/31/2021 HITOSHI INOUE $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 308154 09/30/2020 HONG JHUN $3,800.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 977782 08/04/2022 PACIFICO DARRAS DOROJA $36.58 UNCLAIMED CHECK 974892 06/16/2022 JESUS SUAREZ $36.66 UNCLAIMED CHECK
227513 08/12/2015 HSGC HOSPITALITY STORES LLC $8,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 979693 09/08/2022 NURA TEMURYAN $37.27 UNCLAIMED CHECK 967495 02/03/2022 CARMELLA NAZARIAN $37.64 UNCLAIMED CHECK 983348 11/17/2022 MARGAREET ASLANIAN $39.05 UNCLAIMED CHECK 314348 03/16/2021 J.D. THOMPSON ; CAMD $9,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 974898 06/16/2022 TING GAO $40.52 UNCLAIMED CHECK
979688 09/08/2022 DEBORAH LAMB $41.36 UNCLAIMED CHECK
970598 03/24/2022 MARIAM AKOPYAN $41.97 UNCLAIMED CHECK 977780 08/04/2022 MARJANITEH ATNEYEL $42.82 UNCLAIMED CHECK 317943 06/24/2021 JENIA KHACHEKIAN $2,800.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 969438 03/10/2022 NATALIE SETO $43.20 UNCLAIMED CHECK
977776 08/04/2022 ILYAS DALTSAEV $43.35 UNCLAIMED CHECK 968998 03/01/2022 LOOKING TOWARD THE FUTURE, INC. $45.26 UNCLAIMED CHECK 147416 04/19/2022 TINO SALOOMEN $46.80 UNCLAIMED CHECK 318176 06/28/2021 JIMMY LARREA $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 315718 04/28/2021 JIN RONG LI; FENG ZH $7,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 976673 07/21/2022 JESUS SUAREZ $49.45 UNCLAIMED CHECK
971497 04/19/2022 MARGO GASAMANIAN $51.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 979692 09/08/2022 KIRILL KULESHOV $51.30 UNCLAIMED CHECK 979433 09/01/2022 ELIJAH ZIOMEK $54.71 UNCLAIMED CHECK 152834 12/05/2022 MALMQUIST, FIELDS AND CAMASTRA, A LAW CORP $54.90 UNCLAIMED CHECK 314722 03/29/2021 JOSE TIMBOL $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 153351 12/20/2022 ROSENBERG YUDIN & PEATMAN, LLP $55.50 UNCLAIMED CHECK 313356 02/28/2021 JUAN OSEGUEDN $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 305844 07/10/2020 K&J CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC $8,418.60 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 147071 04/06/2022 TOBY DARBY $56.75 UNCLAIMED CHECK
308960 10/31/2020 KALASHYAN,VAHE $5,500.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 316521 05/12/2021 KARAPET ZAKARYAN $2,400.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 310113 11/30/2020 KAREN DELFS $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 313796 03/08/2021 KAREN DELFS $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 316176 05/03/2021 KAREN DELFS $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 317237 06/02/2021 KAREN DELFS ; INSITE $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 307373 08/31/2020 KENNETH A GUERRERO $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 976128 07/07/2022 XAVIER NIX $57.38 UNCLAIMED CHECK
979686 09/08/2022 BKB CONSTRUCTION LP $58.02 UNCLAIMED CHECK 969191 03/03/2022 MATTHEW KOWALEWSKI $58.10 UNCLAIMED CHECK 966601 01/27/2022 ZAGHIK DAR SARKISSIAN $60.71 UNCLAIMED CHECK 317812 06/17/2021 KRISTINA BOGHOZIAN; $2,400.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 299420 02/04/2020 KSI INVESTMENTS I, LLC. $28,500.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 308160 09/30/2020 KYLE SULLIVAN $4,350.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 979996 09/15/2022 GUSTAVO SILVA $61.18 UNCLAIMED CHECK 974665 06/09/2022 LOUSSIK TCHARANYAN $61.42 UNCLAIMED CHECK 974449 06/02/2022 ANDRANIK BAGHRAMYAN $62.98 UNCLAIMED CHECK 152679 11/29/2022 PETER ROBINSON $63.75 UNCLAIMED CHECK 313839 03/03/2021 LEO GRBOYAN $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 145904 02/28/2022 ERIC MEYER $64.69 UNCLAIMED CHECK
310607 11/30/2020 LEVON MAMIKONYAN $30,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 78 of 745

309480 10/31/2020 LEVON MAMIKONYAN; NUNE ASHKHATOYAN; KAREN K KURGINIAN $468.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 309480 10/31/2020 LEVON MAMIKONYAN; NUNE ASHKHATOYAN; KAREN K KURGINIAN $252.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 984599 12/08/2022 MASATO ENDO $65.62 UNCLAIMED CHECK
979440 09/01/2022 OSVALDO FUENTES $67.14 UNCLAIMED CHECK 982850 11/03/2022 ANDREA FAVIA MORALES $68.38 UNCLAIMED CHECK 305534 07/20/2020 LHK, INC. ; DBA VINTAGE MOTORS $3,500.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 147533 04/26/2022 JOEL LARDIZABAL, MD INC. $68.47 UNCLAIMED CHECK 271877 03/05/2018 LINC HOUSING CORP. $30,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 314128 03/15/2021 LION'S LIFE INSURANC $30,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 980012 09/15/2022 VARTOOM MEGERDICHIAN SINGERDI $70.33 UNCLAIMED CHECK 313343 02/28/2021 LORIS BABAYAN $3,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 318092 06/23/2021 LOS ANGELES COUNTY M $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 318093 06/23/2021 LOS ANGELES COUNTY M $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 982686 10/27/2022 SYLVIA MANUKYAN $70.83 UNCLAIMED CHECK 981784 10/20/2022 MAGDALENA M GONZALES $71.79 UNCLAIMED CHECK 146969 04/04/2022 LEXITAS RWD $75.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK
968632 02/24/2022 MARIA VAZQUEZ $76.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 972442 04/26/2022 VERDUGO CITY POST OFFICE $78.01 UNCLAIMED CHECK 971119 04/07/2022 ASSOC INSTR PCRTS $78.87 UNCLAIMED CHECK 313372 02/28/2021 MANOOKIAN,RIMA $2,400.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 146973 04/04/2022 GLENDALE ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER $82.30 UNCLAIMED CHECK 312120 01/31/2021 MARAT HOVANESYAN HOLDINGS LLC $8,250.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 969295 03/08/2022 ROSALINDA BARCENA GALLEGOS $83.77 UNCLAIMED CHECK 969206 03/03/2022 WELLS FARGO BANK ATM $86.69 UNCLAIMED CHECK 313360 02/28/2021 MARIA MCFARLANE $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 313360 02/28/2021 MARIA MCFARLANE $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 980247 09/22/2022 KAI SAITO $87.45 UNCLAIMED CHECK
146971 04/04/2022 PAIN MANAGEMENT CENTER $87.50 UNCLAIMED CHECK 980240 09/22/2022 ANOUSH TOROUSIAN $89.07 UNCLAIMED CHECK 971661 04/21/2022 NOELANI CASIANO $90.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 981794 10/20/2022 TIANCA MATHIS $92.31 UNCLAIMED CHECK 317426 06/07/2021 MARINA VANYAN $4,600.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 974796 06/14/2022 ARTHUR GREENWALD $92.97 UNCLAIMED CHECK 308886 10/31/2020 MARK SKEEHAN : MONICA SKEEHAN $3,220.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 973383 05/19/2022 ISAAC FERRUFINO $93.57 UNCLAIMED CHECK 979169 08/25/2022 JOHN SONG $96.97 UNCLAIMED CHECK
981778 10/20/2022 JINGHUI GAO $98.39 UNCLAIMED CHECK
305995 07/20/2020 MATT CLAUSSEN $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 971253 04/12/2022 GLENDALE CENTRE THEATER $100.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 971126 04/07/2022 SARKY MOURADIAN $100.89 UNCLAIMED CHECK 978077 08/11/2022 GLENDALE BURBANK FIRESIDE $105.25 UNCLAIMED CHECK 972552 04/28/2022 ANGELA CROSS $106.39 UNCLAIMED CHECK 307646 09/30/2020 MEGRABYAN BUILDERS INC $2,400.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 144615 01/03/2022 MALMQUIST, FIELDS AND CAMASTRA, A LAW CORP $109.80 UNCLAIMED CHECK 309239 10/31/2020 MICHAEL HAYDEN $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 977767 08/04/2022 WEIBO HONG $111.08 UNCLAIMED CHECK
310262 11/30/2020 MICHAEL TCHAKMAKJIAN $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 317873 06/17/2021 MIKE M. ORUJIAN $4,700.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 147105 04/08/2022 USC CARE MEDICAL GROUP $111.14 UNCLAIMED CHECK 969189 03/03/2022 LIDA AVANIAN $111.71 UNCLAIMED CHECK 970996 04/05/2022 ROSA RODRIGUEZ $116.25 UNCLAIMED CHECK 300866 02/13/2020 NARE & MANE LLC $30,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 969294 03/08/2022 ROSA RODRIGUEZ $116.26 UNCLAIMED CHECK 314904 04/12/2021 NEW DAWN ENTERPRISES $5,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 260347 06/01/2017 NICHOLSON VERTEX LP $30,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 317586 06/07/2021 NINA GABRIELE $3,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 974811 06/14/2022 SUSAN SOLIS $117.06 UNCLAIMED CHECK
307388 08/31/2020 NUEVA VERGUDO LLC $9,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 974881 06/16/2022 DIANELYS CASTINEIRA $123.05 UNCLAIMED CHECK 312992 02/28/2021 OAKMONT COUNTRY CLUB $6,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 148714 06/13/2022 CABRILLO CARDIOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP, INC. $127.85 UNCLAIMED CHECK 79 of 745

312426 01/31/2021 P R CONSTRUCTION INC $3,234.20 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 312426 01/31/2021 P R CONSTRUCTION INC $7,265.80 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 977758 08/04/2022 RASOUL MOKABBERI $128.22 UNCLAIMED CHECK 149586 07/19/2022 ROSENBERG YUDIN & PEATMAN, LLP $129.50 UNCLAIMED CHECK 983122 11/10/2022 CA PACIFIC HOLDINGS LLC $131.47 UNCLAIMED CHECK 969832 03/22/2022 SINCLAIR GLENDALE, LLC $132.02 UNCLAIMED CHECK 983347 11/17/2022 MAGDALENA M GONZALES $138.26 UNCLAIMED CHECK 313766 03/08/2021 PERCH KERIMYAN $2,400.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 977744 08/04/2022 HAYK DAVTYAN $139.64 UNCLAIMED CHECK 146965 04/04/2022 RIVERSIDE PHYSICAL THERAPY $145.32 UNCLAIMED CHECK 314281 03/15/2021 PRECIOUS FRANKLIN LC $2,400.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 144612 01/03/2022 SPEED RATING $150.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 967507 02/03/2022 ZABELA OGANESIAN $150.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 310365 11/30/2020 RAZMIK BAGHUMYAN $4,400.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 969680 03/17/2022 DAVID GRANDFIELD MOLINE $155.19 UNCLAIMED CHECK 313970 03/15/2021 RICARDO C ZAMBRANA $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 313971 03/15/2021 RICARDO C ZAMBRANA $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 314754 03/29/2021 RICARDO C ZAMBRANA $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 314753 03/29/2021 RICARDO C ZAMBRANA $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 314968 04/12/2021 RICARDO C ZAMBRANA $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 318052 06/23/2021 RICARDO C ZAMBRANA $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 984602 12/08/2022 POLINA TERNOVAIA $158.40 UNCLAIMED CHECK 315257 05/03/2021 RICARDO ZAMBRAMA $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 315235 05/03/2021 RICARDO ZAMBRAMA $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 316835 05/17/2021 RICARDO ZAMBRAMA $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 316103 05/17/2021 RICARDO ZAMBRAMA $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 317312 06/02/2021 RICARDO ZAMBRAMA $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 972820 05/05/2022 ANDREW MILLER $161.97 UNCLAIMED CHECK 146966 04/04/2022 CYNTHIA THAIK, M.D., FACC, APMC $162.36 UNCLAIMED CHECK 317081 05/21/2021 ROBERT TEROGANESYAN $5,200.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 299823 02/04/2020 ROBERTO A. POLO ; ROBERT POLO BUILDING $3,150.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 317639 06/10/2021 ROBIN RORRES $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 147132 04/11/2022 FURMAN, PSY. D. SHARON $162.60 UNCLAIMED CHECK 968074 02/17/2022 VARTAN TER POGHOSSIAN $164.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 975082 06/23/2022 CAROL PLATZ $165.74 UNCLAIMED CHECK
981322 10/06/2022 THOMAS GREEN $169.77 UNCLAIMED CHECK 966569 01/27/2022 ANTRANEEK KREDYAN $171.28 UNCLAIMED CHECK 153232 12/15/2022 WALTER A. THOMAS MD INC. $172.79 UNCLAIMED CHECK 973394 05/19/2022 WILLIAM CHAVEZ $172.81 UNCLAIMED CHECK 984850 12/15/2022 YONG CHO $185.31 UNCLAIMED CHECK
976666 07/21/2022 BENJAMIN WRIGHT $187.90 UNCLAIMED CHECK 146984 04/04/2022 LEXITAS RWD $197.23 UNCLAIMED CHECK
978308 08/18/2022 RICARDO ESCALERA $202.14 UNCLAIMED CHECK 317696 06/10/2021 S 3 BUILDERS ; LIFE $4,500.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 311707 12/31/2020 SAEED CHEHRAZI $3,600.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 252014 11/28/2016 SARKIS MARDIROSS $30,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 146983 04/04/2022 LEXITAS RWD $203.05 UNCLAIMED CHECK
977519 08/01/2022 RUBEN MARTIROSYAN $207.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 153239 12/15/2022 WALTER A. THOMAS MD INC. $208.20 UNCLAIMED CHECK 316895 05/24/2021 SCHIMENTI CONSTRUCTI $30,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 306888 08/31/2020 SCHIMENTI CONSTRUCTION $30,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 315021 05/10/2021 SERGIO MEJIA ; ALICI $3,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 311296 12/31/2020 SEVAK ALLAHVERDIAN $5,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 976378 07/14/2022 HOWARD DERNEHL $213.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 311383 12/31/2020 SHAKEH JINGOZIAN ; AYKO AVAKIAN $7,600.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 970610 03/24/2022 VANIK ALEKSANI $217.20 UNCLAIMED CHECK 315316 04/12/2021 SHAWMUT WOODWORKING $30,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 981786 10/20/2022 MARLON ABRAHAMS $225.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 979689 09/08/2022 EDIK GHADIMIAN $229.38 UNCLAIMED CHECK 273140 04/03/2018 SINANIAN $30,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 150526 08/22/2022 ROSENBERG YUDIN & PEATMAN, LLP $231.70 UNCLAIMED CHECK 80 of 745

315761 04/26/2021 SIPAN DESIGN & DEVEL $3,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 973007 05/10/2022 ISAAC RODRIGUEZ $232.60 UNCLAIMED CHECK 311896 01/31/2021 SMG, LLC $3,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 979179 08/25/2022 TIANYU ZHANG $242.23 UNCLAIMED CHECK 146435 03/21/2022 PROVIDENCE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA $249.70 UNCLAIMED CHECK 966595 01/27/2022 SIMON LEE $277.50 UNCLAIMED CHECK
984161 11/29/2022 BIOMEDICAL WASTE DISPOSAL $278.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 310611 11/30/2020 STEPHEN MORGAN; JENNIFER SIHWA MORGAN $2,600.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 980004 09/15/2022 LAURA BENAVIDES $281.55 UNCLAIMED CHECK 270970 02/13/2018 STUDIO AUTO BODY SERVICE INC. $9,500.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 975955 06/30/2022 AARON TOWNSEND $292.38 UNCLAIMED CHECK 146972 04/04/2022 VANOWEN MEDICAL ASSOCIATES $299.62 UNCLAIMED CHECK 148885 06/17/2022 PEARLMAN, BROWN & WAX, L.L.P. $303.22 UNCLAIMED CHECK 306727 08/31/2020 THE FISHEL COMPANY ; LUIS ALVAREZ $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 306718 08/31/2020 THE FISHEL COMPANY ; SANTA ANA OPERATIONS $645.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 974662 06/09/2022 KIAN JALALIAN $310.88 UNCLAIMED CHECK 977777 08/04/2022 JONGWOO KIM $318.58 UNCLAIMED CHECK
152405 11/10/2022 VALENCIA SPORTS MEDICINE $430.34 UNCLAIMED CHECK 152492 11/16/2022 FOOTHILL CARDIOLOGY $438.95 UNCLAIMED CHECK 968956 03/01/2022 JASON GREENGLASS $445.55 UNCLAIMED CHECK 146978 04/04/2022 MYMATRIXX $463.77 UNCLAIMED CHECK
985846 12/29/2022 MAURICE BRANDEAU $499.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 982805 11/03/2022 JEIMEE ESTRADA-MILLER $500.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 981770 10/20/2022 ARTEM AVETISYAN $545.61 UNCLAIMED CHECK 309114 10/31/2020 TONY FONG $9,100.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 309321 10/31/2020 TONY FONG $2,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 308894 10/31/2020 TOYOTA SCION OF GLENDALE $30,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 309420 10/31/2020 TOYOTA SCION OF GLENDALE $2,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 976665 07/21/2022 ARTEM AVETISYAN $557.86 UNCLAIMED CHECK 306310 07/31/2020 TROJAN STORAGE FUND 2019, LLC $2,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 306312 07/31/2020 TROJAN STORAGE FUND 2019, LLC $30,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 981681 10/18/2022 TRAILVIEW PARTNERS LLC#DBA: LORMAN EDUCATION SERVICES $559.20 UNCLAIMED CHECK 311557 12/31/2020 VACACIA LLC $2,400.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 311557 12/31/2020 VACACIA LLC $5,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 317612 06/10/2021 VAHAGG ARUTYUNYAN $2,400.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 317612 06/10/2021 VAHAGG ARUTYUNYAN $2,400.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 306115 07/20/2020 VAHAGN OVASAPYAN ; EDITA GARIBIAN $8,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 317520 06/17/2021 VAHE MATEVOSYAN $2,400.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 148863 06/16/2022 ERIC WEBBER $580.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK
977746 08/04/2022 JOSEPHINE TANG $587.48 UNCLAIMED CHECK 971273 04/12/2022 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO $593.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 316993 05/24/2021 VARDAN ISAYAN $2,400.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 317475 06/17/2021 VARDAN ZEYNALYAN; AI $3,200.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 971652 04/21/2022 ELEVEN23 MARKETING LLC $593.97 UNCLAIMED CHECK 972957 05/10/2022 ARNIES SMOG CHECK AND REPAIR $600.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 307068 08/31/2020 VASKEN ANOUCHIAN $240.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 289263 04/18/2019 VAV PLASTICS, INC $7,400.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 315766 04/26/2021 VERDUGO & LEX, LLC $3,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 979039 08/23/2022 LEAH M. TORRES $626.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 979306 08/30/2022 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS $645.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 313861 03/03/2021 VIGEN ANDERASIAN $3,400.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 145648 02/17/2022 CAROLE GLOVSKY $679.54 UNCLAIMED CHECK 971040 04/05/2022 YUN S SCOTT $732.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK
977265 07/28/2022 MARICELA CHAIREZ $928.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 978694 08/18/2022 MARICELA CHAIREZ $928.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 980641 09/22/2022 MARICELA CHAIREZ $928.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 983091 11/10/2022 MEZTLI PROJECTS INC $1,000.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 984099 11/22/2022 YUN S SCOTT $1,038.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 985726 12/22/2022 YUN S SCOTT $1,038.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 314632 06/07/2021 YAYRA LLC (INVOICE# 1335) $9,700.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT 967265 01/27/2022 YUN S SCOTT $1,088.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 81 of 745

968878 02/24/2022 YUN S SCOTT $1,088.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 970571 03/24/2022 YUN S SCOTT $1,088.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 972335 04/21/2022 YUN S SCOTT $1,088.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 974247 05/26/2022 YUN S SCOTT $1,088.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 975723 06/23/2022 YUN S SCOTT $1,088.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 978923 08/18/2022 YUN S SCOTT $1,088.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 980869 09/22/2022 YUN S SCOTT $1,088.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 982407 10/20/2022 YUN S SCOTT $1,088.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 146434 03/21/2022 MSC GROUP INC $1,250.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 983841 11/22/2022 LEON NAZARETIAN $1,312.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 975080 06/23/2022 BOUJEE CHICKEN INC $2,191.89 UNCLAIMED CHECK 971015 04/05/2022 SAS INSTITUTE INC $3,700.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 969665 03/17/2022 MONDOCEA JIANU $7,913.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 976294 07/14/2022 EXPRESS ENVIRONMENTAL CORP#DBA: EXPRESS OIL $8,316.33 UNCLAIMED CHECK 980601 09/22/2022 LALIQUE PROPERTIES LLC $9,699.00 UNCLAIMED CHECK 309606 10/31/2020 ZHANNA GEVORKIAN $4,000.00 CASH BOND DEPOSIT

PUBLISH: MAY 7, 2026 & MAY 14, 2026
82 of 745

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 11, 2026

City Media Contact: Communications and Community Relations Email: [email protected]
Phone: (818) 548-3342

Finance Contact: Steve Kwon
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (818) 548-3907

City of Glendale Announces Opportunity to Claim Uncashed Checks and Deposits
Glendale, CA – The City of Glendale is working to return unclaimed checks and deposits, that have been unclaimed for more than three years, to their rightful owners.

In compliance with state rules (California Government Code Sections 50050-50056), the City will publish a notice in the local newspaper for two consecutive weeks. This notice will list all unclaimed checks and deposits. If no one claims the money within 45 to 60 days of the first notice, the funds will become the City’s property.

Some smaller amounts, such as unclaimed funds under $15 that have been outstanding for over a year, may automatically be transferred to the City’s General Fund without public notice.

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT, the Director of Finance of the City of Glendale, County of Los Angeles, State of California, declares that the following monetary sums have been held by the Director of Finance and have remained unclaimed and will become the property of the City of Glendale on June 30, 2026.

What You Need to Know:
 List of unclaimed checks and deposits can be found on the City’s website or through the City’s new unclaimed property portal.
 You can file your claim by one of the following two methods. o Submit a claim form to the Finance Department.
o Submit your claim online through the City’s unclaimed property portal.  Claims must be submitted before June 30, 2026.
 City’s website –
83 of 745

https://www.glendaleca.gov/government/departments/finance/accounts- payable
 Unclaimed Property Portal –
https://unclaimedproperty.glendaleca.gov/
Additional Information:
 Claim forms are available at the front counter in the City’s Finance Department, located at 141 N Glendale Ave, Room 346, Glendale, CA 91206.  Claim forms can also be downloaded from the City’s website.  For questions about unclaimed checks, you can contact Finance Department, Accounts Payable at (818) 548-3907.
 For questions about unclaimed deposits, you can contact Finance Department, General Accounting at (818) 548-3243.

This process and this notice comply with California Government Code Sections 50050- 50056.

84 of 745

85 of 745

86 of 745

87 of 745

88 of 745

89 of 745

90 of 745

91 of 745

92 of 745

5g
26-90188

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Service Agreement Between the City of Glendale and IQ Personnel, Inc.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Item
Approved for June 23, 2026 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
These personnel services are essential to the continued operation of the Glendale Fire Department’s Environmental Management Center Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Program. Specifically, the agreement provides for up to three qualified Environmental Technicians who will assist with the safe handling, sorting, and processing of hazardous waste materials, in addition to performing general labor duties at the City’s HHW collection facility. These roles are critical to ensuring compliance with environmental regulations, maintaining public safety, and supporting efficient facility operations.

In November 2025, the Department executed a Professional Services Agreement with IQ Personnel to provide temporary staffing for these functions. The current PSA is scheduled to expire on June 30, 2026. Approval of this amendment will ensure continuity of service and adequate staffing levels to meet program demands and regulatory requirements. 93 of 745

5g2
26-90188
6 8
8 4

RECOMMENDATION
To amend the Professional Service Agreement between the City of Glendale and IQ Personnel, Inc. to extend the term for an additional three years, through June 30, 2029, and increase the contract amount by $189,000 to the new total not-to-exceed amount of $239,000.

ANALYSIS
In March 1991, the Glendale Fire Department established the Environmental Management Center (EMC) to serve residents of Glendale as a centralized, one-stop facility for environmentally responsible waste management. The EMC provides proper disposal and recycling services for household hazardous waste and used oil, along with public education on reducing, reusing, and recycling household products.

The Glendale Fire Department’s Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Program was among the first of its kind in the nation and the first permanent indoor operation in Southern California. Since its inception, the program has collected more than 3,000 tons of waste. The facility operates weekly and serves residents of Glendale, Montrose, and La Cañada, and is authorized to accept certain hazardous materials from eligible small businesses at a subsidized cost.

Currently, the HHW Program is operated by one Fire Environmental Safety Specialist. To maintain safe and efficient operations, additional staffing support is required. Staff therefore recommend retaining IQ Personnel to provide Environmental Technicians for the EMC. This agreement will ensure the availability of qualified Environmental Technicians to support the safe handling and management of hazardous waste. It will also enable the HHW facility to operate on a weekly basis, providing service to residents of Glendale, Montrose, and La Cañada, as well as to eligible small businesses with certain hazardous waste materials.

Key responsibilities include:
Handling hazardous and universal waste from households and very small quantity generators
Responding to spills, including containment, cleanup, and initiating emergency protocols
Assisting with the preparation and shipment of hazardous waste Interacting with the public and providing information during events Performing daily general labor tasks as directed by Glendale Fire Department staff Required skills and qualifications:
Proficiency in reading, writing, and following instructions in English Knowledge of proper handling, segregation, packaging, and transportation of hazardous waste
Familiarity with personal protective equipment (PPE), including respirators, gloves, aprons, goggles, and gowns
Ability to operate tools such as wrenches, mallets, drum dollies, and pallet jacks 94 of 745

5g3
26-90188
6 8
8 4
Training in identifying and categorizing unknown substances and chemicals Familiarity with California waste management regulations, Safety Data Sheets, and Material Safety Data Sheets
Knowledge of hazardous waste labeling and shipping requirements in accordance with Department of Transportation regulations
Compliance and certification requirements:
Completion of 40-hour Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) training in accordance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards
Annual 8-hour HAZWOPER refresher training
Medical clearance for hazardous waste work and respirator use Current respirator fit test documentation
The service provider must ensure that all IQ Personnel maintain up-to-date certifications and are fully equipped to meet the physical and regulatory demands of hazardous waste management.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
N/A

FISCAL IMPACT
The cost of Amendment No.1 with IQ Personnel is projected to total approximately $189,000 over a three-year term, with estimated annual expenditures of $60,000 in Year 1 (FY 2026-27), $63,000 in Year 2 (FY 2027-28), and $66,000 in Year 3 (FY 2028- 29). Funding for Year 1 has been included in the Proposed FY 2026-27 budget, as outlined below. No additional appropriation is requested at this time. Funding for future years will be requested as part of the annual budget process.

Proposed FY 2026-27 Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$60,000 GL: 43110-2190-GFD-4006-P0000- Hazardous Disposal Fund Department Cost Center Program
Fire Hazardous Materials Control

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
N/A

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1: Deny the Fire Department’s request.
2: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff. 95 of 745

5g4
26-90188
6 8
8 4

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Jeffrey Brooks, Fire Chief
Prepared by:

Jovan Diaz, Fire Marshal
Todd Tucker, Deputy Chief
Nayiri Moumdjian, Deputy Director of Fire Administration Dave Stimson, Principal Fire Environmental Safety Specialist Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
IQ Personnel Quotation
Certificate of Liability Insurance
96 of 745

M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member ________________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________________, that the City Manager or his designee execute an amendment to the IQ Personnel, Inc. agreement, extending the term by an additional three years to June 30, 2029 and increasing the contracted amount by an additional $189,000 to the new total not-to-exceed amount of $239,000. The amendment shall be subject to the review and approval as to form by the City Attorney.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
97 of 745

98 of 745

CERTIFICATE HOLDER
© 1988-2010 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.

ACORD 25 (2010/05)

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE

CANCELLATION

DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)

CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE

LOCJECT

PRO-POLICY
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:

OCCURCLAIMS-MADE

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY

GENERAL LIABILITY
PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $

DAMAGE TO RENTED
EACH OCCURRENCE $
MED EXP (Any one person) $
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $
GENERAL AGGREGATE $
PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $
$RETENTIONDED

CLAIMS-MADE
OCCUR
$
AGGREGATE $
EACH OCCURRENCE $UMBRELLA LIAB

EXCESS LIAB
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, if more space is required) INSR

LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER

POLICY EFF
(MM/DD/YYYY)

POLICY EXP
(MM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS

WC STATU-

TORY LIMITS
OTH-
ER
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE
E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT
$
$
$

ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
If yes, describe under
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
(Mandatory in NH)
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?

WORKERS COMPENSATION

AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY

ANY AUTO

ALL OWNED SCHEDULED

HIRED AUTOS

NON-OWNED

AUTOS AUTOS
AUTOS

COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
BODILY INJURY (Per person)
BODILY INJURY (Per accident)
PROPERTY DAMAGE $
$
$
$

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS

CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.

INSR
ADDL
WVD
SUBR
N / A
$
$
(Ea accident)
(Per accident)
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS

CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.

IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).

The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:

INSURED
PHONE
(A/C, No, Ext):

PRODUCER
ADDRESS:

E-MAIL
FAX
(A/C, No):

CONTACT
NAME:

NAIC #
INSURER A :

INSURER B :

INSURER C :

INSURER D :

INSURER E :

INSURER F :

INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

ALKEME Insurance
TDW Risk Management Associates
111 Corporate Dr. #200
Ladera Ranch CA 92694
Melissa Lauer
(949)620-6862
[email protected]
License#: 0M55604
Homeland Insurance Company of New York
34452
IQPERSO-01
Intact Insurance Specialty Solutions
IQ Personnel, Inc.
8039 Painter Ave., Ste 200
Whittier CA 90602
United Wisconsin Insurance Company
29157
1216197000
B
X
1,000,000
50,000
X
1,000,000
5,000,000
2,000,000
793-01-43-15-0000
7/13/2025
7/13/2026
X
Y
Y
5,000
A
X
4,000,000
4,000,000
7930143160000
7/13/2025
7/13/2026
X
C
Y
WC026-00064-024
9/30/2025
9/30/2026
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
B
Contractors Pollution Liab
11/21/2025
X
793-01-43-15-0000
7/13/2025
7/13/2026
Each Pollution Condit
Deductible
$1,000,000
$5,000
Contractors Environmental Liability Coverage Part
(Each Pollution Condition)
Contractors Pollution Liability $1,000,000 $5,000 Each Pollution Condition Transportation Pollution Liability $1,000,000 $5,000 Each Pollution Condition Non-Owned Disposal Site Liability (Claims-Made) $1,000,000 $5,000 Each Pollution Condition Professional Liability Insurance $1,000000 Limit Per Claim, $2,000,000 Aggregate Limit, April 13, 2005 Retroactive Date. The $5,000,000 Commercial Excess Liability applies to this coverage.

Pollution Liability Insurance $1,000,000 Limit Per Claim, $2,000,000 Aggregate Limit, April 13, 2005 Retroactive Date.

See Attached...

City of Glendale - Risk Management
Attn: Veronika Padron
613 E. Broadway #100
Glendale CA 91206
99 of 745

ACORD 101 (2008/01)
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
© 2008 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.

THIS ADDITIONAL REMARKS FORM IS A SCHEDULE TO ACORD FORM, FORM NUMBER: FORM TITLE:

ADDITIONAL REMARKS
ADDITIONAL REMARKS SCHEDULE Page of
AGENCY CUSTOMER ID:

LOC #:

AGENCY

CARRIER NAIC CODE

POLICY NUMBER

NAMED INSURED
EFFECTIVE DATE:

IQPERSO-01
1 1
ALKEME Insurance
IQ Personnel, Inc.
8039 Painter Ave., Ste 200
Whittier CA 90602
25 CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
The City of Glendale, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers are included as additional insureds as respects General Liability coverage, per the attached endorsement as per written contract. Coverage is primary and non-contributory per the attached endorsement respects General Liability coverage as per written contract. Waiver of subrogation applies as respects General Liability coverage per the attached endorsement as per written contract. *Please note Copyright Laws apply to the Acord form prohibiting us from modifying the cancellation clause. However, per TDW Risk Management Associates, LLC procedures we will notify you within 30 days if said policy cancels for any reason other than non-payment. In the event that the policies cancel for non-payment, you will be notified within 10 days.
100 of 745

101 of 745

102 of 745

103 of 745

104 of 745

105 of 745

5h
26-90191

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Amendment 9 for FY 2026-27 Los Angeles County Aging and Disabilities (AD) baseline funding for Supportive Services Program (SSP).

1. Motion to accept $66,129 in baseline funding from Los Angeles County AD for FY 2026- 2027 Supportive Services Program; and authorize the City Manager or a designee to execute Amendment Nine for the SSP232404 Subaward period July 2026 – July 2027 to accept and implement funding.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for June 23, 2026 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Los Angeles County Aging and Disabilities Department (AD) is providing grant funds in the amount of $66,129 in baseline funding for FY 2026-27 to provide senior case management services under the Community Services & Parks (CSP) Department.

Los Angeles County AD baseline grant funding will allow the Supportive Services Program (SSP) to provide case management services to seniors 60 years of age and older in the SSP program. SSP provides annual assistance for up to 80 unduplicated seniors, including: initial intake, in-home assessment, care plan, information and referral services, purchase of goods/services, annual reassessments, and well-being checkups.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council accept and authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment 9 to the SSP232404 subaward period July 2026 – June 2027 to accept and implement $66,129 in baseline funding from Los Angeles County AD for the FY 2026-2027 Supportive Services Program.

ANALYSIS
CSP has been providing the Supportive Services Program (SSP), better known as senior case management, since 1992. SSP provides comprehensive, long-term services to seniors 60 years of age and older, and utilizes a case manager’s professional skills and competence to serve senior clients and link them to a full range of appropriate services.

The primary goal is to assist the elderly in maintaining their independence and living in 106 of 745

5h2
26-90191
6 8
8 6
their own homes. The SSP is operated through the Senior Services Unit, which also provides long-term services that include the Elderly Nutrition Program, Emergency Meals, and Telephone Reassurance Program.

CSP was originally awarded an SSP subaward from Los Angeles County AD through a noncompetitive process whereby the City enters into a subaward agreement for a one- year term, commencing July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2024, with three additional options to renew annually for an anticipated total subaward term of four years. Baseline funding for the program requires a 12% cash match. Amendment Nine is for the fourth year of the four-year subaward term and commences July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2027.

SSP baseline funds are allocated from the Older Americans Act to provide funding for the daily operations of the program, including case manager home visits, case planning, monitoring, contract compliance, invoicing, purchase of goods/service, data tracking, and direct assistance to seniors for case management services. Examples of direct assistance include payment of a utility bill, purchase of small appliances, home cleaning, clothing, respite, medical equipment/supplies, etc.

SSP assists up to 80 unduplicated seniors sixty years of age and older each fiscal year, with the following senior case management services: initial intake screening, in-home assessment, service authorization, care plan, and connecting to other services. Service areas for SSP include Glendale, La Crescenta, Montrose, and Verdugo City.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
The SSP is part of the Senior Services Unit, which operates out of the Adult Recreation Center. Program services are advertised quarterly in the CSP Leisure Guide, CSP Newsletter, on the Department website and social media; reports are provided on the progress of the program to the City of Glendale’s Senior Services Committee; and outreach is conducted with other community agencies to ensure the public is aware of the available services.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City was awarded $66,129 in SSP baseline grant awards from Los Angeles County AD, which was included as part of the FY 2026-2027 budget process.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The action being considered does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4) as it creates a government funding mechanism or constitutes other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical FY 2026-27 Proposed Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$66,129 Various-2700-CSP-0020-P0000
CSP01171AG
Nutritional Meals Grant Fund
107 of 745

5h3
26-90191
6 8
8 6
impact on the environment; thus, it is not subject to CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15060(c)(3).

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1: Do not approve acceptance of $66,129 in baseline funding from Los Angeles County AD for FY 2026-2027 SSP, which will result no case management or direct assistance to seniors in the Supportive Services Program.

Alternative 2: The City Council may consider any alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Onnig Bulanikian, Director of Community Services & Parks Prepared by:

Maggie Kavarian, Community Services Manager
Aylin Isayan, Community Services Supervisor
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
None.
108 of 745

1 1
7 3
4 6
MOTION
Moved by Council Member __________________________________________, seconded by Council Member ________________________________________, that, with respect to the report of the director of Community Services and Parks dated June 23, 2026, the Council of the City of Glendale hereby accepts $66,129 in baseline funding from Los Angeles County Aging and Disabilities Department for FY 2026-2027 Supportive Services Program; and authorizes the City Manager or a designee to execute Amendment Nine to the SSP232404 Subaward period July 2026 – June 2027 to accept and implement funding.

Vote as Follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
109 of 745

5i
26-90224

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Elderly Nutrition Program Amendment No. 3 Award of Grant Funds from County of Los Angeles Aging and Disabilities Department for FY 2026-27 in the amount of $493,377.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for June 23, 2026 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Community Services & Parks (CSP) Department is requesting that the City Council authorize acceptance of $493,377 in ENP funding for FY 2026-27 from Los Angeles County (AD) through Amendment No. 3 of the County of Los Angeles Aging and Disabilities Department Contract Subaward Number ENP252604. This is year two of a four year subaward to provide ENP Congregate Meals (C1), ENP Home Delivered Meals (C2), and Telephone Reassurance (TR) programs to older adults 60 years of age and older. The total award breakdown for year two is through the following funding categories:

$316,300 Older Americans Act baseline funding (C1, C2, TR) $60,000 Net County Cost funding for C1
$83,000 Modernizing Older Californians Act funding (C1, C2) $34,077 Nutrition Services Incentive Program funding (C1, C2) Amendment No. 3 for Subaward ENP252604 will allow the ENP program to serve approximately 43,887 congregate meals, 12,938 home delivered meals, provide 80 homebound seniors with a 3-day supply of emergency meals, and make 1,300 telephone reassurance calls to homebound seniors.
110 of 745

5i2
26-90224
6 8
9 6

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council accept $493,377 in Elderly Nutrition Program (ENP) funding from Los Angeles County Aging and Disabilities (AD) for FY 2026-2027; and authorize the City Manager or a designee to execute Amendment No. 3 to Subaward ENP252604, period July 2026 – June 2027, to accept and implement the funding.

ANALYSIS
CSP has been providing meal service to older adults 60 years and older in the Greater Glendale Area since 1979 with grant funding administered from Los Angeles County AD through the federal Older Americans Act (OAA). The ENP provides an important opportunity for social contact and is the only meal many seniors receive in a day.

The ENP program is operated through the Senior Services Section which provides comprehensive, long-term services that include Congregate Meal (C1), Home Delivered Meals (C2), Emergency Meals (EM), Telephone Reassurance (TR) and Supportive Services (SSP). The goal of these services is to assist the seniors in our community to maintain their independence and live in their own homes.

The City’s ENP C1 program operates two congregate meal sites serving lunch 7 days per week at the Adult Recreation Center and five days per week at Sparr Heights Community Center. An average of 4,000 meals per month are served in the program to over 500 unduplicated seniors annually.

The ENP C2 program is for homebound older adults requiring food delivery assistance for physical and/or medical reasons and is substantiated by a doctor’s order before beginning program services. Program services include a weekly delivery of seven frozen meals that include bread, fruit, milk, and dessert. The Emergency Meals Program is part of the Home Delivered Meals and provides three days’ worth of shelf stable meals to clients enrolled in the program per fiscal year. Telephone Reassurance Program is also a part of the Home Delivered Meals program which ensures seniors who are shut-in receive a weekly well-being call.

The City contracts with TRIO Community Meals, LLC (TRIO) to provide congregate and home delivered meals catering services for the ENP program. The contract period is from December 1, 2022 through November 30, 2026.

TRIO has informed the City it would like to exercise the contract terms to extend the contract an additional 2 years to November 30, 2028. During this contractual period the meal rate will increase by 6% per meal on December 1, 2026. Staff will return to Council to amend TRIO contract through November 30, 2028.

The cost per meal rate during this period is as follows:
7/1/26 to 11/30/26 12/1/26 to 6/30/27
Congregate Meals $4.56 per meal $4.83 per meal
Home Delivered Meals $4.75 per meal $5.04 per meal
111 of 745

5i3
26-90224
6 8
9 6
The City has a purchase order with Revolution Foods to provide Emergency Meals to Home Delivered Meals program clients for 3 (three) days’ worth of shelf stable meals at a unit rate of $6.85 per meal.

CSP was awarded an ENP grant award from Los Angeles County AD for OAA baseline funding through a noncompetitive process where the City entered into a subaward agreement for a one-year term, commencing July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026, with three additional options to renew annually for an anticipated total subaward term of four years. OAA baseline funding for the program requires a 12% cash match. Amendment No. 3 is for year two of a four-year subaward term.

On May 28, 2026, Los Angeles County AD informed the City of various ENP grant funding totaling $493,377 be used for C1, C2, and Telephone Reassurance Programs in FY 2026- 2027 from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027. In addition to OAA baseline funding in FY 2026-2027, Net County Cost (NCC) funding, Modernizing Older Californian Act (MOCA) state funding, and Nutrition Services Incentive Program (NSIP) funding is also included in the FY 2026-2027 funding.

OAA baseline funding, NCC, and NSIP is a reimbursable grant with a 12% cash match while MOCA funding does not require a cash match.

The LA County AD reimbursement rate for ENP funding for meal service delivery for FY 2026-2027 is as follows:

Service Type Funding Source Reimbursement Rate
Congregate Meals OAA/NCC/MOCA $8.45 per meal
Home Delivered Meals OAA/NCC/MOCA $9.37 per meal
Telephone Reassurance Calls OAA Baseline $1.00 per call Congregate Meals NSIP C1 $1.00 per meal
Home Delivered Meals NSIP C2 $1.00 per meal
OAA baseline funding, NCC, MOCA, and NSIP funding will enable the City to provide 43,887 congregate meals, 12,938 home delivered meals, provide 80 homebound seniors with a 3 day’s supply of emergency meals, and make 1,300 telephone reassurance calls to homebound seniors through June 30, 2027.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
The Elderly Nutrition Program is administered by the Senior Services Section at the Adult Recreation Center, with an additional meal site located at the Sparr Heights Community Center. Program services are promoted quarterly through the Community Services & Parks (CSP) Leisure Guide, the CSP newsletter, CSP social media channels, and the City’s website. Outreach is also conducted in collaboration with local community agencies to increase public awareness of available services. The Senior Services Committee convenes quarterly at the Adult Recreation Center, with meeting notices and agendas 112 of 745

5i4
26-90224
6 8
9 6
posted and distributed to encourage public participation

FISCAL IMPACT
The subaward from Los Angeles County (AD) for ENP OAA, NCC, MOCA, and NSIP grant funding totals $493,377, which was included as part of the FY 2026-2027 budget process.

The appropriation is outlined below:

FY 2026-27 Proposed Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$220,000 Various-2700-CSP-0020-P0000
CSP01170AG
Nutritional Meals Grant Fund
$95,000 Various-2700-CSP-0020-P0000
CSP01172AG
Nutritional Meals Grant Fund
$1,300 Various-2700-CSP-0020-P0000
CSP01173AG
Nutritional Meals Grant Fund
$60,000 Various-2700-CSP-0020-P0000
CSP01602AG
Nutritional Meals Grant Fund
$63,000 Various-2700-CSP-0020-P0000
CSP01603AG
Nutritional Meals Grant Fund
$20,000 Various-2700-CSP-0020-P0000
CSP01604AG
Nutritional Meals Grant Fund
$27,847
Various-2700-CSP-0020-P0000
CSP01605AG Nutritional Meals Grant Fund
$6,230 Various-2700-CSP-0020-P0000
CSP01606AG
Nutritional Meals Grant Fund
Department Cost Center Program
Community
Services &
Parks
Projects

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
The action being considered does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4) as it creates a government funding mechanism or constitutes other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment; thus, it is not subject to CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15060(c)(3).

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements. 113 of 745

5i5
26-90224
6 8
9 6

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION

1. Do not approve acceptance of funding totaling $493,377 from Los Angeles County AD for FY 2026-2027 ENP and do not authorize City Manager or a designee to execute Amendment No. 3 to Subaward ENP252604; which will result in meal service stoppage.

2. The City Council may consider any alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Onnig Bulanikian, Director of Community Services & Parks Prepared by:

Maggie Kavarian, Community Services Manager
Tereza Aleksanian, Assistant Director of Community Services & Parks Aylin Isayan, Community Services Supervisor
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
None
114 of 745

1 1
7 4
0 5
MOTION
Moved by Council Member ____________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that the Council authorizes the acceptance of FY 2026-2027 Older Americans Act, Net County Cost, Modernizing Older Californians Act and Nutrition Services Incentive Program funding totaling $493,377 from County of Los Angeles Aging and Disabilities Department (AD) for the provision of Elderly Nutrition Program (ENP), as set forth in the Report to Council dated June 23, 2026; and authorizes the City Manager or a designee to execute Amendment No.3 to the County of Los Angeles Aging and Disabilities Department Contract Subaward Number ENP252604, period July 2026 – June 2027, to accept and implement the funding.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
115 of 745

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: City Council Regular Meeting Schedule for the 2026-27 Fiscal Year

1. Motion Establishing City Council Regular Meeting Schedule for the 2026-27 Fiscal Year and Cancelling Specified City Council Meetings

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Consent Calendar
Approved for June 23, 2026 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Every year prior to the commencement of the new fiscal year, the Council establishes a regular meeting schedule for the upcoming fiscal year. After consulting with the Mayor, the City Manager proposes the regular meeting schedule for the 2025-26 fiscal year as identified in this report.
116 of 745

25j
5 1
8 1

RECOMMENDATION
That the Council adopt the Council regular meeting schedule for the 2026-27 fiscal year, including cancelling specified meetings.

ANALYSIS
The City Council’s regular meetings are held on Tuesday evenings at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. The Council also holds special meetings from time-to-time as well as joint meetings with other City agencies, as necessary. On an annual basis, the Council adopts a regular meeting schedule per fiscal year by cancelling specified regular meetings.

The regular meeting calendar is generally established to average three regular meetings per month. This balances the need for a calendar sufficient to handle the Council’s robust regular business while providing breaks in the calendar to allow sufficient staff time to prepare reports and undertake other business of the City. It also allows for breaks in the schedule for holidays and winter break. If additional meetings become necessary, the Council can add meetings to the calendar or call special meetings. It should be noted that the City Manager and staff strive to calendar Council items in a manner so that agendas are not overly light, nor overburdened in a manner that makes for excessively heavy agendas. In addition, under the Council’s rules and procedures, Council business must end by 11 p.m. unless extended by affirmative vote of three councilmembers.

Taking these factors into account, and after consultation with the Mayor, the City Manager proposes regular meetings for the 2026-27 fiscal year to be held every Tuesday at 6 p.m. except on the following dates, which would be cancelled:
2026
July 7*
August 18
September 8
October 13
November 24
December 22
December 29
2027
January 12
February 16
March 30
April 27
May 25
June 15
117 of 745

35j
5 1
8 1
*Note: The July 7, 2026, Council meeting will be cancelled only if Los Angeles County and the Council certify the results of the June 2, 2026, election, and the newly elected City officers are sworn in, on or before June 30, 2026.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
This item is exempt from CEQA because there is no reasonable possibility that the proposed action will result in any significant environmental impact.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1: The Council can modify the proposed regular meeting schedule for fiscal year 2026-27.

Alternative 2: The Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Michael J. Garcia, City Attorney
Roubik R. Golanian, City Manager
Prepared by:

Michael J. Garcia, City Attorney
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
118 of 745

MOTION
Moved by Council Member ____________________________, seconded by Council Member __________________________ that the City Council hereby establishes its regular meeting schedule for the 2026-27 fiscal year to include every Tuesday at 6 p.m., except on those dates set forth below (“Excepted Dates”):
2026
July 7 (only cancelled if the results of Glendale’s general municipal election of June 2, 2026 are certified by Los Angeles County and the Glendale City Council, and the newly elected officers are sworn in, on or before June 30, 2026) August 18
September 8
October 13
November 24
December 22
December 29
2027
January 12
February 16
March 30
April 27
May 25
June 15
The regular meetings on the Excepted Dates are hereby cancelled.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
119 of 745

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Adoption of an urgency ordinance, pursuant to Senate Bill 79 (SB 79, also known as “The Abundant and Affordable Homes Near Transit Act”), temporarily exempting properties located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) and/or containing a locally designated historic resource as of January 1, 2025, from the provisions of SB 79.

1. Urgency Ordinance to Temporarily Delay Effectuation of SB 79 for Certain Sites Located Within the VHFHSZ and/or Containing a Locally Designated Historic Resource.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Ordinance
Approved for June 23, 2026 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On March 3, 2026, the City Council received a status report regarding SB 79, and potential implementation strategies available to local jurisdictions. Following staff's presentation and public testimony, the City Council directed staff to pursue the delayed effectuation option authorized by SB 79 and return with an ordinance identifying eligible exempt sites.

On June 9, 2026, the City Council reviewed staff's analysis of SB 79, including updated mapping information received from the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) on the locations and tier level of BRT stops in the City of Glendale. Following discussion, the City Council introduced an urgency ordinance to implement the delayed effectuation provisions of SB 79 for the identified eligible exempt properties within Glendale.

The urgency ordinance is now before the City Council for adoption. 120 of 745

2 6
6 6
1 RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council adopt the proposed urgency ordinance, pursuant to SB 79, temporarily exempting certain properties from SB 79 prior to its July 1 effective date.

ANALYSIS
As noted in the staff report and presentation to City Council on June 9, 2026, SB 79 becomes effective on July 1, 2026, and establishes minimum residential development standards for qualifying properties located within one-half mile of designated Transit- Oriented Development (TOD) stops.

The June 9 staff report provided a detailed overview of SB 79, its applicability within Glendale, the City's coordination with the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), and neighboring jurisdictions. The report also described the delayed effectuation provisions authorized by SB 79 and identified sites within Glendale that may be temporarily exempted from the legislation.

Following review of that information, the City Council introduced an urgency ordinance, exercising the delayed effectuation authority provided under SB 79 and temporarily exempting properties located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) and/or containing a locally designated historic resource as of January 1, 2025.

The ordinance is now before the City Council for adoption. No changes have been made to the ordinance since its introduction.

If adopted, the urgency ordinance will take effect immediately and the identified exempt properties will be temporarily excluded from SB 79 applicability pursuant to the delayed effectuation provisions established in State law. Under SB 79, these exemptions would remain in effect until one year after the City adopts its 7th Cycle Housing Element, which is currently anticipated to occur approximately in 2030, unless the City adopts a qualifying TOD Alternative Plan at an earlier date. Adoption of the delayed effectuation ordinance will preserve the City's ability to continue evaluating long-term implementation options, including potential TOD Alternative Plans and additional delayed effectuation provisions authorized under SB 79.

Staff will continue to monitor guidance from HCD, SCAG's final TOD mapping, and implementation efforts occurring throughout Los Angeles County. Staff will also follow up on the requests and direction provided by the City Council on June 9, 2026, including further evaluation of sites that may qualify for delayed effectuation, potential zoning amendments (upzoning) that could support TOD stop radius exemptions, and the feasibility of local rent stabilization measures that may create additional statutory exemptions under SB 79. Should additional analysis support future exemptions or other actions authorized by SB 79, staff will return to the City Council with recommendations at a later date.
121 of 745

3 6
6 6
1 NEXT STEPS
As discussed in the June 9 staff report, SB 79 requires that any delayed effectuation ordinance be submitted to the HCD prior to local adoption. Staff submitted the proposed ordinance and supporting documentation to HCD on May 27, 2026, consistent with State law.

If the ordinance is adopted, staff will provide a copy of the adopted ordinance to HCD within the timeframe required by SB 79. HCD will then determine whether the ordinance is in substantial compliance with the provisions of SB 79. Staff will continue to coordinate with HCD and return to the City Council if any additional action is necessary.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
This report serves as an opportunity to provide the community additional information on the status of SB 79 and options available to the City. An email blast was sent on June 4th to all of the Long Range Planning outreach list members (over 850+ members, including HOA and community group representatives), regarding the introduction of the proposed SB 79 delayed effectuation ordinance.

FISCAL IMPACT
No fiscal impact is associated with this urgency ordinance delaying the effectuation of SB 79 on certain sites.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Government Code §65912.160(c)(2), which explicitly states that an ordinance adopted to implement the provisions of SB 79 shall not be considered a project under Division 13 (commencing with §21000) of the Public Resources Code.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION

1. The City Council may choose not to adopt the delayed effectuation ordinance for certain sites and allow the legislation to take full effect on July 1, 2026;

2. The City Council may propose any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Michael J. Garcia, City Attorney
Jack Wong, Interim Director of Community Development
Prepared by:

Vilia Zemaitaitis, AICP, Deputy Director of Long Range Planning Gillian Van Muyden, Chief Assistant City Attorney
122 of 745

4 6
6 6
1 Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS

1. City Council Staff Report from June 9, 2026, regarding “Introduction (June 9) and Proposed Adoption (June 23) of an Urgency Ordinance to Delay Effectuation of the Senate Bill (SB) 79 (“The Abundant and Affordable Homes Near Transit Act”) for Certain Sites Located in Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones and/or Containing a Locally Designated Historic Resource
Staff Report only; Attachments and Video for Item 10a available online at:
https://glendaleca.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=41471. 123 of 745

ORDINANCE NO. ___________

AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA TO DELAY EFFECTUATION OF SENATE BILL 79 (THE ABUNDANT AND

AFFORDABLE HOMES NEAR TRANSIT ACT) FOR CERTAIN SITES LOCATED

WITHIN THE VERY HIGH FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONE AND/OR CONTAINING A

LOCALLY DESIGNATED HISTORIC RESOURCE
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 79 (SB 79), The Abundant and Affordable Homes Near Transit Act of 2025, codified in Government Code Chapter 4.1.5 (commencing with Gov’t. Code Section 65912.155) and operative July 1, 2026, supersedes local zoning and General Plan land use regulations by establishing statewide minimum residential density and development standards for properties located within one-half mile of qualifying transit oriented development (TOD) stops to increase the supply of affordable and market rate housing; and
WHEREAS, SB 79 establishes substantial increases in allowable residential density and building height within large portions of the City, including areas not previously planned or evaluated for such development intensity; and WHEREAS, SB 79 permits the City to adopt an ordinance in accordance with Gov’t. Code Section 65912.160 to delay effectuation of SB 79 on certain sites within TOD zones, subject to review and approval by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), prior to SB 79’s effective date of July 1, 2026; and
WHEREAS, SB 79 permits exclusion of sites located in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ), as determined by the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection pursuant to Gov’t Code Section 51178, or within the state responsibility area, as defined in Section 4102 of the Public Resources Code, pursuant to Gov’t. Code Section 65912.161(b)(1)(D); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Gov’t. Code Section 65312.161(b)(1)(F), SB 79 also permits exclusion of sites that were designated on a local historic register as of January 1, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the Housing Element of the General Plan Goal 2 supports the preservation of historic resources and encourages new residential development that respects neighborhood scale, historic continuity, and community character; and WHEREAS, the Safety Element of the General Plan Policy 4-2 encourages the City to limit new residential development within VHFHSZ, where feasible, in order to reduce wildfire risk and protect public safety; and WHEREAS, the City's proposed updated General Plan Land Use Element includes goals and policies designed to encourage high-density residential and mixed- use development along major transportation corridors and adjacent to public 124 of 745

transportation facilities where infrastructure and multimodal transportation options are more easily accessible; and
WHEREAS, urgency action is needed to afford temporary local exclusion of properties locally designated as historic resources as of January 1, 2025, and to exclude properties located within VHFHSZ, in order to avoid subjecting these properties to SB 79’s increased density and height regulations, which become effective on July 1, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that adopting this ordinance on an urgency basis will benefit the City by delaying SB 79’s application to the above- mentioned sites, and will provide more time for the City to complete research to bring forward a potential Transit-Oriented Development Alternative Plan, as permitted by Gov’t. Code Section 65912.161, that allows transfer of SB 79 density to TOD areas.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Glendale finds that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference.

SECTION 2. The following sites are excluded from Gov’t Code Section 65912.157 until one year following adoption of the seventh revision of the housing element:
1) Sites within a VHFSZ (Gov’t Code Section 65912.161(b)(1)(D)), as determined by the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection pursuant to Gov’t. Code Section 51178, or within the state responsibility area, as defined in Section 4102 of the Public Resources Code; and
2) Sites containing a historic resource designated on the City’s local register as of January 1, 2025 (Gov’t. Code Section 65912.161(b)(1)(F)).

SECTION 3. By enacting this ordinance, the City Council directs the Director of Community Development, or designee, to: 1) indicate on its public facing zoning map which sites or transit oriented development zones are subject to SB 79 and which are temporarily exempt or excluded, including sites that qualify for such status pursuant to Gov’t. Code Sections 65912.160(e)(1)-(2), 65912.161(b)(1)(A)-(F), and 65912.161(b)(2), and ensure consistency with the most current transit-oriented development zones map published by Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG); and 2) transmit a final copy of this ordinance to HCD no later than 60 days following adoption.

SECTION 4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) the City Council hereby finds that this Ordinance is exempt from further review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Gov’t. Code §65912.160(c)(2), which explicitly states that an ordinance adopted to implement the provisions of SB 79 shall not be considered a project under Division 13 (commencing with §21000) of the Public Resources Code.
125 of 745

SECTION 5. Urgency Clause. The City Council finds and declares that the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety requires that this ordinance be enacted as an urgency measure pursuant to Gov’t. Code Section 36937(b), as well as pursuant to the Glendale City Charter, Article VI, Sections 6 and 7, which provide that the City Council may, upon a four-fifths vote, adopt an urgency ordinance that will become effective immediately upon adoption, upon the declaration by the City Council that the ordinance is necessary as an emergency measure for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health or safety. This Ordinance is necessary as an emergency measure for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, and welfare because SB 79 becomes operative on July 1, 2026 and, absent immediate action, would apply to properties containing locally designated historic resources as of January 1, 2025 and properties located within VHFHSZ, as identified by the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, without a temporary local exclusion in place. If this Ordinance is not adopted immediately, these sensitive properties would be subject to SB 79’s increased height and density standards on July 1, 2026. Accordingly, this Ordinance is declared to be an urgency measure necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, and welfare, and shall take effect immediately upon adoption.

SECTION 6. Severability. This Ordinance’s provisions are severable. If any portion of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision does not affect the validity of the Ordinance’s remaining portions and the Ordinance’s application to other persons and circumstances. The City Council declares that it would have passed the remainder of this Ordinance without the invalid or unconstitutional provision.

SECTION 7. Effective Date. Pursuant to the Glendale City Charter and Government Code section 36937(b), this ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by four-fifths vote of the City Council and expires one year following adoption of the seventh revision of the housing element, pursuant to Government Code Section 65912.161(b)(1).

SECTION 8. Certification. The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of this Ordinance; cause it to be entered into the City’s book of original ordinances; make a note of the passage and adoption in the records of this meeting; and within fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, cause it to be published or posted in accordance with California law. 126 of 745

Adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale on the _____ day of ______, 2026. ___________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS.

CITY OF GLENDALE )
I, Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. _________ was adopted by a 4/5 ths vote of the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the _____ day of _________________, 2026, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
___________________________________
City Clerk
127 of 745

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Introduction (June 9) and Proposed Adoption (June 23) of an Urgency Ordinance to Delay Effectuation of the Senate Bill (SB) 79 (“The Abundant and Affordable Homes Near Transit Act”) for Certain Sites Located in Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones and/or Containing a Locally Designated Historic Resource.

1. Urgency Ordinance to Delay Effectuation of Senate Bill 79 (“The Abundant and Affordable Homes Near Transit Act”) for Certain Sites Located Within the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone and/or Containing a Locally Designated Historic Resource, for Introduction.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for June 9, 2026 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On March 3, 2026, City Council received a status report on SB 79 and proposed options for its implementation. Following staff’s detailed presentation and public testimony, City Council directed staff to seek further clarifications of the law and to prepare a “delayed effectuation ordinance” for sites that could be exempted from SB 79 implementation prior to its July 1, 2026 effective date.

This report summarizes new insights as to how SB 79 applies in Glendale and presents an urgency ordinance to temporarily exclude sites within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone and/or those containing a locally designated historic resource as of January 1, 2025.

This report also includes additional information as to other sites that may qualify for delayed effectuation and additional options for the City Council to consider.

Exhibit 1 - 06.09.26 CC Report for Introduction of SB79 Delayed Effectuation Ordinance 128 of 745

2 6
8 6
7 RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council review, introduce and subsequently adopt the proposed urgency ordinance to exempt certain properties from SB 79 before it takes effect on July 1, 2026.

ANALYSIS
SB 79, the Abundant and Affordable Homes Near Transit Act, goes into effect on July 1, 2026 (see full text of the bill attached as Exhibit 1). SB 79 establishes new development standards and increased residential density and height limits for properties located within ½ mile of a Transit Oriented Development (TOD) stop and zoned for residential, mixed-use, or commercial uses.

Staff has been working diligently since the bill’s adoption in October 2025 to interpret the bill, gather data, and understand how the legislation affects Glendale. A detailed overview of SB 79 and its implications to the City, as well as implementation options, were presented to City Council and the public on March 3, 2026 (see staff report as Exhibit 2, with attachments and video available online for Council Item 10d:
https://glendaleca.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=40679).

As noted in the staff report and Council presentation, SB 79 establishes two tiers of TOD stops, based on the type and frequency of transit provided, each with specific development standards based on a site’s proximity to a TOD stop. The two tiers are summarized below:

Tier Transit Type
Tier 1  Heavy Rail Transit
 Very High Frequency Commuter Rail (at least 72 trips per day) Tier 2  Light Rail Transit
 High Frequency Commuter Rail (at least 48 trips per day)  Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Stations with full-time dedicated lanes or operation in a separate right-of-way dedicated for public transportation, & service every 15 minutes or less during AM & PM peak commuter periods SB 79 then applies three radiuses around each TOD stop (within 200 feet adjacent to the TOD stop, between 200 feet and ¼-mile, and between ¼ mile and ½-mile) that establish the height, density and Floor Area Ratio (FAR) permitted for an SB 79 project.

The SB 79 development standards for Tier 2 TOD stops applicable to Glendale are summarized in the table below
Tier 2 TOD Stop Development Standards
Distance from TOD stop Within 200 ft. ¼ Mile ½ Mile
Permitted Height (ft)* 85’ (8 stories) 65’ (6 stories) 55’ (5 stories) Permitted Density (DU/AC) 140 100 80
Permitted Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 4.0 3.0 2.5
* The height in stories provided is approximate based on overall height allowed.

Exhibit 1 - 06.09.26 CC Report for Introduction of SB79 Delayed Effectuation Ordinance 129 of 745

3 6
8 6
7 In addition to the standards above, SB 79 projects can be coupled with Density Bonus regulations, allowing even greater density to be achieved. Housing projects utilizing the Density Bonus are permitted to use the density allowed under SB 79 as the “base density” for their projects. SB 79 also grants additional concessions for housing projects, depending on the level of affordable housing provided. Cities are not required to grant a waiver or concession for Density Bonus projects that propose heights above what is permitted by SB 79 unless the project proposes 100% affordable housing.

TOD Stops in Glendale
According to the draft SB79 map released by Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) on June 1, 2026, Glendale has one TOD stop at the Larry Zarian Glendale Transportation Center (GTC) and seven TOD stops along the proposed North Hollywood to Pasadena Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) route. All of Glendale’s TOD stops are categorized as Tier 2 stops. These stops and corresponding radiuses are identified in Exhibit 3.

Larry Zarian Glendale Transportation Center (“GTC”)
In 2023, Glendale adopted TOD zoning that allows densities up to 100 DU/AC near the GTC in Tropico, making much of this area consistent with SB 79 standards. Recent clarifications received from HCD indicate that all parcels within the GTC TOD stop ½- mile radius are subject to SB 79, except for those zoned “Transportation” (T) and “Special Recreation” (SR). This includes portions of the Brand Boulevard of Cars, the industrial and industrial mixed-use zones along San Fernando Road, and even Forest Lawn Cemetery. The map below generally shows the GTC SB 79 TOD stop ¼ mile and ½ mile radiuses (see Exhibit 3):

Exhibit 1 - 06.09.26 CC Report for Introduction of SB79 Delayed Effectuation Ordinance 130 of 745

4 6
8 6
7 North Hollywood to Pasadena Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project According to SCAG’s map, the proposed stops along the BRT route qualify as Tier 2 TOD stops. In Glendale, the BRT is proposed to have seven stops:
 Three stops on West Glenoaks Boulevard between the Burbank border and Central Avenue;
 One stop on Central Avenue at Lexington Drive; and
 Three stops on East Broadway, between Brand Boulevard and the city limits.

The BRT route goes through multiple areas of the city, including low-density single- family neighborhoods along West Glenoaks Boulevard, a high-density urban area in downtown on Central Avenue, and smaller scale commercial uses on East Broadway.

Unfortunately, under SB 79, these varying development patterns are all subject to the same standards, and the City has a very limited ability to mitigate the impacts of SB 79.

The following map generally illustrates the proposed BRT route through Glendale with preliminary radiuses around each stop (see Exhibit 3):

Exhibit 1 - 06.09.26 CC Report for Introduction of SB79 Delayed Effectuation Ordinance 131 of 745

5 6
8 6
7 SB 79 Limitations and Applicable Code Requirements
SB 79 imposes certain restrictions on the type of development that is permitted. SB 79:
 Does not apply to projects containing hotel, motel, or similar transient lodging uses;
 Does not apply to projects requiring demolition of rent- or price-controlled housing on sites containing more than two units that have been occupied within the previous seven years;
 Requires projects to comply with anti-displacement standards under the Housing Crisis Act of 2019 and any and all local implementation programs;  Requires projects greater than 10 units to comply with affordable housing standards and allows cities to enforce inclusionary housing standards; and  Imposes prevailing wage and other labor requirements on buildings over 85 feet in height.

In Glendale, SB 79 projects would remain subject to the following local and state requirements:
 Development standards in the Glendale Zoning Code and any applicable Specific Plan, including the Downtown Specific Plan (DSP);
 The City’s recently adopted Objective Design Standards (ODS);  The City’s Design Review process, including any required public hearings;  The City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (GMC Chapter 30.35);  State law regarding demolition of protected affordable housing units;  Glendale’s anti-displacement program and inclusionary zoning requirements; and  The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Note: SB 79 does not establish a CEQA exemption or create a by-right approval process for qualifying developments. However, SB 79 projects may be combined with other laws, such as AB 130 and CEQA Class 32 (infill development), which may streamline CEQA review.

Local Effort, Interagency Coordination & Remaining Implementation Uncertainties Since the March Council meeting, Glendale staff has continued to regularly meet with a tri-cities working group consisting of planning staff from the cities of Glendale, Burbank, and Pasadena, and has also met with the City of Los Angeles to understand how the neighboring jurisdictions are interpreting and implementing SB 79. Additionally, Glendale staff has been working with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) to accurately identify eligible TOD stops and associated sites.

The City has also sought clarification regarding implementation of the law with the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).

Despite these collaborative efforts, there are still some uncertainties regarding implementation of SB 79. Most significantly, the precise radiuses applicable to each TOD stop will not be finalized until SCAG publishes the official SB 79 mapping for the region, which is anticipated shortly before or perhaps even after the law’s effective date of July 1, 2026. The agency released its mapping methodology on May 22, and its draft Exhibit 1 - 06.09.26 CC Report for Introduction of SB79 Delayed Effectuation Ordinance 132 of 745

6 6
8 6
7 map on June 1, with the official map to be considered by the SCAG Regional Council on July 2, 2026.

These radiuses are central to implementation of the legislation because they will determine which parcels fall within the 200-foot, one-quarter-mile, and one-half-mile distances from qualifying TOD stops. The mapped boundaries will not only establish the applicable development standards for affected properties, but will also determine the precise development capacity and density assumptions that must be incorporated into any local TOD alternative plan pursued by a jurisdiction.

Delayed Effectuation Ordinance
At the March 3, 2026, City Council meeting, having accepted the status report on and proposed options for implementing SB 79, Council directed staff to proceed with Option 3 – Delayed Effectuation and Implementation Ordinance. The delayed effectuation ordinance option allows cities to adopt a local ordinance that excludes certain sites from SB 79 and delays full implementation of the law until one year after adoption of the 7th Cycle Housing Element. Under this approach, SB 79 implementation would be delayed until approximately 2030 unless a TOD alternative plan is adopted before then.

As part of the delayed effectuation option, individual sites may be exempted if they meet certain criteria. In Glendale, only three site-level exemptions apply:
 Sites located in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone;  Sites with a historic resource designated on a local register prior to January 1, 2025; and
 Sites where allowable density and residential FAR are at least 50 percent of SB 79 standards;
Glendale has several sites that are located within a VHFHSZ and/or that contain a historic resource as of January 1, 2025. Staff is presenting an urgency ordinance to temporarily exempt those sites; the urgency ordinance goes into effect immediately upon adoption. This would allow the City to remove these sensitive sites from SB 79 applicability prior to the July 1st effective date, while continuing to monitor the legislation over the next several years as additional bills are passed, ordinances are adopted in other California communities, and legal challenges are resolved. In addition, this option does not preclude the City from adopting a TOD alternative plan at a later date, once additional extensive research, analysis and public outreach are conducted.

Based on the current draft mapping analysis, there are approximately 465 parcels within the SB 79 GTC area, with 22 parcels that would be excluded due to non-applicable zoning (Special Recreation (SR) or Transportation (T) zones), VHFHSZ designation, or historic status, leaving 443 parcels potentially subject to SB 79. Of the remaining 443 parcels, approximately 3 are within 200 feet of a qualifying stop, 153 are within a quarter-mile, and 287 are within a half-mile radius.

There are also approximately 8,656 parcels within the SB 79 BRT area. Approximately 317 parcels would be excluded due to zoning (SR or T), VHFHSZ designation, or Exhibit 1 - 06.09.26 CC Report for Introduction of SB79 Delayed Effectuation Ordinance 133 of 745

7 6
8 6
7 historic status, leaving 8,339 parcels potentially subject to SB 79. Of the remaining parcels, approximately 112 are within 200 feet of a qualifying stop, 3,156 are within a quarter-mile, and 5,071 are within a half-mile radius.

After accounting for the proposed exclusions, approximately 8,782 (443 + 8,339) parcels citywide would remain subject to SB 79. The proposed delayed effectuation urgency ordinance does not currently address sites where allowable density and residential FAR are already at least 50 percent of SB 79 standards; this issue is discussed in greater detail in the subsequent section below.

Proposed sites for exclusion are identified in Exhibit 4 - Map of VHFHSZ sites within TOD radiuses and Exhibit 5 - Map of historic register sites as of January 1, 2025, within TOD radiuses.

Additional Considerations for Delayed Effectuation
As mentioned above, Glendale does have several additional sites that qualify for delayed effectuation under the criterion that they meet at least 50% of the permitted SB 79 densities (50 du/ac within ¼ mile and 40 du/ac within a ½ mile of a TOD stop). These sites are most notably located in the TOD zones around the GTC, within the Downtown Specific Plan (DSP) area, and areas currently zoned R-1250. Council has the option of exempting these sites from SB 79 projects as well. However, since these sites have previously been identified as appropriate for higher density development, these exemptions should be carefully considered. An unintended consequence of exempting existing these high-density sites may be that SB 79 development interest and pressure shift to lower density parcels.

Additionally, entire TOD stop radiuses may qualify for delayed effectuation if:
 At least 1/3 of sites in the TOD radius currently allow at least 50% of the density and FAR required by the bill, and
 All sites within the TOD radius cumulatively allow for at least 75% of the aggregate density allowed by the bill.

Additional parcel-level analysis is needed to determine whether the TOD stops located near the GTC and along Central Avenue in the DSP qualify for the zone-level exemption.

It should be noted that the single-family and low-density multi-family neighborhoods within the three TOD stops along the Glenoaks portion of the BRT do not qualify for this zone-level exemption, nor are the individual sites currently zoned with enough density to qualify for delayed effectuation. As such, there are limited options available to prevent SB 79 projects along the Glenoaks corridor. Even under a TOD alternative plan which could reduce allowable SB 79 densities by 50% (maximum), all of the Glenoaks corridor, including the R1 areas, would have to be upzoned to 40-to-50 dwelling units per acre, equivalent to the R-1250 zone designation.

Exhibit 1 - 06.09.26 CC Report for Introduction of SB79 Delayed Effectuation Ordinance 134 of 745

8 6
8 6
7 Should Council wish to pursue a TOD stop radius exemption for delayed effectuation, staff would need direction to conduct additional analysis and return at a later date with findings and recommendations. SB 79 does not require cities to adopt an ordinance to temporarily exempt sites prior to July 1, 2026; therefore, Council may amend this ordinance or adopt a subsequent ordinance to include additional sites at a later date.

NEXT STEPS
Staff recommends adoption of a “delayed effectuation” ordinance as an urgency matter to exempt certain properties from SB 79 before SB 79 takes effect on July 1, 2026.

Any proposed ordinance must be submitted to the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for review at least 14 days prior to local adoption; staff submitted the proposed urgency ordinance for review on May 27, 2026. Any ordinance enacted must be submitted to HCD within 60 days of adoption. HCD has 90 days to review the enacted ordinance and make a finding whether it is in substantial compliance with SB 79. If HCD deems the ordinance non-compliant, the local agency has 60 days to respond before taking further action. If the local agency is found to be in non- compliance, by either refusing to amend the ordinance or make findings explaining how the ordinance complies, then HCD is required to notify the Attorney General that the local government is in violation.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
This report serves as an opportunity to provide the community additional information on the status of SB 79 and options available to the City. An email blast was sent to all of the Long Range Planning outreach list members (over 850+ members, including HOA and community group representatives), regarding this SB 79 presentation.

FISCAL IMPACT
No fiscal impact is associated with this urgency ordinance delaying the effectuation of SB 79 on certain sites.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION

1. The City Council may choose not to adopt the delayed effectuation ordinance for certain sites and allow the legislation to take full effect on July 1, 2026;

2. The City Council may propose any other alternative not proposed by staff.

Exhibit 1 - 06.09.26 CC Report for Introduction of SB79 Delayed Effectuation Ordinance 135 of 745

9 6
8 6
7 ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Michael J. Garcia, City Attorney
Jack Wong, Interim Director of Community Development
Prepared by:

Teresa Santilena, AICP, Principal Planner
Vilia Zemaitaitis, AICP, Deputy Director of Long Range Planning Gillian Van Muyden, Chief Assistant City Attorney
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS

1. Full text of SB 79

2. City Council Staff Report from March 3, 2026, regarding status of and proposed options for SB 79 (the Abundant and Affordable Homes Near Transit Act), without attachments (Staff Report and Attachments for Item 10d available online at:
https://glendaleca.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=40679) and Council Motion

3. SCAG Map of SB 79 affected parcels around the Larry Zarian Glendale Transit Center and the Noho to Pasadena BRT line

4. SB 79 Exclusion Map of VHFHSZ sites within TOD radiuses

5. SB 79 Exclusion Map of historic register sites (as of January 1, 2025) within TOD radiuses
Exhibit 1 - 06.09.26 CC Report for Introduction of SB79 Delayed Effectuation Ordinance 136 of 745

10a
26-90223

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Potential Regulations for Personal Delivery Devices (PDDs) Operating Within the Public Right-of-Way

1. Introduction of Urgency Ordinance enacting a moratorium on the deployment and operation of PDDs on public rights-of-way;

2. Motion providing direction regarding establishment of regulations for operation of PDDs on public right-of-way.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for June 23, 2026 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On March 31, 2026, the City Council received a report regarding PDDs, commonly referred to as delivery robots. At that meeting, Council deferred action and directed staff to continue monitoring regional developments, conduct additional outreach, and return with updated information as well as a potential moratorium pending establishment of pilot or permanent regulations.

Since that time, staff has conducted additional research, met with PDD operators, coordinated with City departments, reviewed regulations adopted by neighboring jurisdictions, and initiated outreach to the business community. Staff found that neighboring jurisdictions generally regulate PDDs through permits, operating agreements, or pilot programs rather than prohibiting them outright. However, significant differences exist regarding allowable automation levels, fleet sizes, operating areas, insurance requirements, and oversight mechanisms.

The purpose of this report is to provide City Council with updated information regarding PDD operations, present a potential moratorium on operation of PDDs, and to obtain direction regarding preparing regulations governing PDD operations within Glendale.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council consider the information presented in this report and provide direction to staff. The Council may introduce an urgency ordinance enacting a moratorium 137 of 745

10a2
26-90223
6 8
9 5
on the deployment and operation of PDDs on public rights-of-way and/or direct staff to develop regulations governing the operation of PDDs on public rights-of-way.

ANALYSIS
Background
PDDs are electrically powered devices designed to transport goods using sidewalks and pedestrian facilities. These devices are most used for food, grocery, and retail deliveries and have become increasingly common throughout Southern California.

On March 31, 2026, the City Council received a report regarding PDDs. At that meeting, Council directed staff to continue monitoring regional developments, coordinate with neighboring jurisdictions, conduct additional outreach, and return with updated information to inform a potential regulatory framework.

Research Conducted Since March 2026
Following Council direction, staff conducted additional research regarding PDD operations and regulations. Staff met with PDD operators to better understand available technologies, operational models, safety features, insurance requirements, and municipal oversight mechanisms. Staff also reviewed recently adopted regulations and pilot programs implemented by neighboring jurisdictions and coordinated with internal departments regarding operational, accessibility, liability, and enforcement considerations.

In addition, the Economic Development Division conducted targeted outreach to businesses located in areas where PDDs have been observed operating. Outreach included direct contact with restaurant owners and managers, as well as coordination with the Glendale Chamber of Commerce, Montrose Chamber of Commerce, and Montrose Shopping Park Association. A total of 38 businesses responded to the outreach effort, including 35 restaurants and three retail establishments.

Among restaurant respondents, 13 reported they were currently utilizing PDDs for deliveries, while 22 reported they were not currently using the technology. Of the businesses not utilizing PDDs, most indicated that the devices had not yet been deployed by their delivery platforms in their service areas rather than expressing opposition to the technology itself. Only two respondents reported actively choosing not to participate due to corporate policy or because their product was not suitable for delivery with robots.

Businesses currently utilizing PDDs generally report positive experiences, rating their usefulness an average of 7.5 out of 10. Respondents using the autonomous delivery robots cited benefits such as reliable delivery performance and faster or more efficient deliveries (as compared with non-robotic delivery options), and positive customer reactions, with several noting that customers find the delivery robots appealing or “cool.” 138 of 745

10a3
26-90223
6 8
9 5
Across users, all respondents reported no material impact on restaurant operations, including staffing, workflow, or order volume, with the single exception being a complaint by one respondent about increased platform notifications sent from Uber Eats to the restaurant when a robot delivery unit was being sent. Similarly, all users reported minimal to no impact (positive or negative) on customers beyond general curiosity regarding the technology.

Three respondents to the survey were retail shops in Montrose. While they cannot use autonomous delivery robots as they do not deliver food, they did share concerns about the robots introducing congestion on sidewalks, potential for vandalism against the robots, and a detraction from the neighborhood’s charm. The three (3) retail shops also noted that they have not seen any impact (negative or positive) on their operations, nor on their customers because of the presence of the robots. It must be noted that PDD companies have not been observed by staff to be operating in the neighborhood of Montrose.

In addition to the survey responses, staff received feedback from the Glendale Chamber of Commerce regarding the use of PDDs within Downtown Glendale. The Chamber noted that portions of Downtown contain several multi-story office buildings served by shared parking facilities and have limited restaurant options within walking distance, making food delivery a popular service for employees in the area. The Chamber indicated that PDDs have been viewed positively in these locations because they provide a convenient delivery option while reducing the need for delivery drivers to temporarily stop in red zones, search for parking, or navigate large office buildings to complete deliveries.

The Chamber further noted that the devices may be particularly well-suited for certain commercial areas where delivery demand is high and pedestrian activity is more predictable. At the same time, the Chamber acknowledged that operational considerations, including pedestrian safety and sidewalk conditions, should be evaluated in more congested areas if the city elects to permit PDD operations in the future.

Overall, feedback suggests that autonomous delivery robots are currently perceived by restaurants as a positive supplemental delivery option with limited operational impact at this stage, though there is cautious optimism about their potential as deployment expands.

Regional Regulatory Review
Staff reviewed regulations and pilot programs implemented by several Southern California jurisdictions, including Los Angeles, Santa Monica, West Hollywood, Pasadena, and Culver City.

While regulatory approaches vary, staff found that neighboring jurisdictions generally permit PDD operations subject to operational controls and oversight. Staff did not identify any California jurisdictions that currently prohibit PDD operations outright. 139 of 745

10a4
26-90223
6 8
9 5
Several common regulatory components were identified among the jurisdictions reviewed, including:
• Insurance and indemnification requirements;
• Business licenses, permits, or operating agreements;
• Fleet size limitations;
• Speed restrictions;
• Geofencing requirements;
• Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance standards; • Device identification requirements;
• Customer service and complaint response standards;
• Data sharing and reporting requirements; and
• Enforcement mechanisms, including permit suspension or revocation.

Los Angeles
The City of Los Angeles currently regulates PDDs through a pilot program administered by the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT). Operators are required to obtain permits and comply with detailed operational requirements addressing insurance, fleet size, ADA compliance, geofencing, reporting requirements, and performance standards.

The Los Angeles program permits both semi-autonomous and autonomous devices.

Operators are generally limited to 75 devices within designated service areas and are subject to annual permit fees based on fleet size. Additional requirements address device specifications, pedestrian accessibility, data sharing, insurance coverage, indemnification, and permit suspension or revocation for non-compliance.

Santa Monica
The City of Santa Monica regulates PDDs through a permit and business license framework supplemented by administrative regulations. Santa Monica's regulations address operational requirements such as insurance and indemnification, ADA compliance, speed restrictions, incident reporting, customer service standards, permitted operating areas, and parking restrictions.

Unlike Los Angeles, Santa Monica limits operations to devices operating at Level 3 automation or below, requiring continuous human oversight. The city does not currently impose fleet limitations but requires operators to establish standard operating procedures and prohibits the delivery of certain materials, including hazardous materials, weapons, and tobacco products.

West Hollywood
West Hollywood initially implemented a pilot program before transitioning to a permanent operating agreement model. Rather than utilizing permits, the city has begun regulating operators through annual operating agreements that establish operating conditions and performance standards.

The framework limits operations to designated hours, caps the number of active devices 140 of 745

10a5
26-90223
6 8
9 5
operating within the city, requires geofencing technology, establishes response time requirements for malfunctions and complaints, requires compliance with ADA accessibility standards, and imposes insurance and indemnification requirements. West Hollywood also charges fees based on fleet size and restricts deliveries to food and retail purchases.

Pasadena
The City of Pasadena continues to evaluate a PDD program and is developing a framework that incorporates elements of both the Santa Monica and West Hollywood models. Pasadena has discussed limiting the number of devices permitted per operator, requiring operating agreements with the city, and implementing permit requirements similar to Santa Monica's program.

Draft concepts reviewed by Pasadena include fleet limitations, operating standards, insurance requirements, and restrictions on advertising displayed on the devices.

Levels of Automation and Technology Considerations
In addition to operational requirements, staff found that jurisdictions vary in the types of PDD technologies they permit. Some programs allow autonomous devices, while others limit operations to devices that remain under continuous human oversight.

Automation levels generally range from Level 0 (No Automation) to Level 5 (Full Automation). Lower-level systems rely heavily on human oversight, while higher-level systems are capable of independently performing operating functions with limited or no human intervention.

Under the City of Santa Monica's PDD regulations, operations are limited to Level 3 automation or below. Level 3 devices can perform certain operating functions and detect environmental conditions, but human oversight remains required. Levels 4 and 5 represent increasingly autonomous operation capable of independently performing operating tasks under specific or all operating conditions.

Staff learned that PDD operators currently utilize different technologies and operational models. Some systems rely on continuous human monitoring and remote intervention, while others are designed to operate with a higher degree of autonomy. As the technology continues to evolve, the City Council may wish to consider whether future regulations should distinguish between semi-autonomous and autonomous devices.

Potential Benefits and Implementation Considerations
Staff's research identified several potential benefits associated with PDD operations, including increased delivery options for residents, support for local businesses, reduced reliance on vehicle-based deliveries for short trips, and opportunities to encourage innovation and emerging technologies.

During discussions with PDD operators, representatives indicated that the devices are primarily utilized for shorter-distance deliveries and smaller orders that may be less 141 of 745

10a6
26-90223
6 8
9 5
attractive to traditional delivery drivers due to lower compensation associated with those trips. As a result, PDDs may provide an additional delivery option for local businesses and customers seeking short-distance deliveries.

Operators also indicated that PDDs may help reduce delivery-related vehicle activity in high-demand commercial areas. According to the operators, deliveries performed by PDDs may reduce the need for delivery drivers to temporarily stop or park in loading zones, red curbs, or other congested areas while picking up and delivering orders.

In addition, operators stated that PDDs can be dispatched immediately once an order is prepared, reducing the time between food preparation and pickup. Operators further indicated that delivery distances are often limited to approximately 30 minutes or less to help maintain food quality and customer satisfaction.

If the City Council elects to pursue regulations governing PDD operations, staff recommends that the Council provide policy direction regarding several operational and regulatory considerations. Staff's review found that neighboring jurisdictions have adopted different approaches depending on local priorities and community needs.

Potential considerations include:
Geographic Limitations – Whether PDD operations should be permitted citywide or limited to specific areas, such as Downtown Glendale, commercial corridors, or other designated zones.
Fleet Limitations – Whether to establish a maximum number of devices that may operate within the city or within specific geographic areas. Operating Distance – Whether to limit the distance a device may travel from a participating business or distribution point.
Hours of Operation – Whether to establish operating hours or prohibit operations during certain times of day.
Level of Automation – Whether to permit all levels of automation or limit operations to devices operating under continuous human oversight, similar to Santa Monica's regulations.
Permitting Structure – Whether operators should be regulated through a permit program, operating agreement, business license requirements, or a combination thereof.
ADA and Accessibility Requirements – Requirements to ensure devices do not obstruct sidewalks, curb ramps, transit stops, or other pedestrian facilities. Data Reporting Requirements – Whether operators should provide operational data, incident reports, complaint records, or other information to the city. Customer Service Standards – Requirements related to complaint response times, emergency contacts, and device identification.

No single regulatory model has emerged as a regional standard. Should Council wish to pursue regulations, staff is seeking direction regarding which operational elements should be incorporated into a Glendale-specific regulatory framework. 142 of 745

10a7
26-90223
6 8
9 5
Additionally, at the direction of Council, the City Attorney has prepared an uncodified urgency ordinance establishing a moratorium on the deployment and operation of PDDs within the right of way. If the Council desires to adopt the ordinance, it should introduce the ordinance (to be adopted at a subsequent meeting) with a sunset provision that would allow it to expire within a defined period of time. The ordinance would act as a moratorium on the deployment and operation of PDDs while the City further studies and prepares draft regulations based on the direction given by Council. Alternatively, Council could direct staff to prepare draft regulations but not enact a moratorium ordinance.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Staff coordinated with the City Attorney's Office, Community Development Department, Economic Development Division, Public Works Department, Police Department, and other City departments regarding PDD operations and regulatory considerations.

In addition, staff met with PDD operators and conducted outreach to the business community regarding potential deployment within Glendale.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report. However, there are indirect costs such as staffing that are associated with enforcing a moratorium and eventual regulation. Additionally, if regulations to enforce PDD’s are approved in Glendale, new feed may be implemented in order to offset staffing costs related to processing permits, inspection and enforcement services.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
An ordinance prohibiting the deployment or operation of PDDs is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301, in that it consists of the operation of existing public facilities, namely, existing highways and streets, sidewalks, and similar facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use.

Moreover, it can be said with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment; thus, it is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061, subdivision (b)(3). Additionally, direction to staff on parameters of a regulatory program does not constitute a “project approval” under CEQA.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1: Do not introduce and adopt an ordinance enacting a moratorium on the deployment and operation of PDDs on public rights-of-way. 143 of 745

10a8
26-90223
6 8
9 5

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Daniel Hernandez, Director of Public Works
Prepared by:

Petra Beglarian, Public Works Manager
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
N/A
144 of 745

1 6
9 1
8 ORDINANCE NO. _______

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE,

CALIFORNIA, ENACTING A TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON THE

DEPLOYMENT AND OPERATION OF PERSONAL DELIVERY DEVICES ON

PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY IN THE CITY OF GLENDALE
WHEREAS, the City of Glendale has a substantial governmental interest in protecting the public health, safety, and welfare of persons using the City's streets, sidewalks, crosswalks, curb ramps, pedestrian paths of travel, parkways, and other portions of the public right-of-way; and
WHEREAS, the public right-of-way is a limited public resource that must safely accommodate pedestrians, persons using wheelchairs and other mobility devices, persons with visual, hearing, cognitive, and other disabilities, older adults, children, bicyclists, transit riders, motorists, emergency responders, public works and utility operations, commercial loading, refuse collection, deliveries, outdoor dining, street furniture, trees, landscaping, and other public and private uses authorized by law; and WHEREAS, personal delivery devices, commonly described as food delivery robots or sidewalk delivery robots, are motorized devices used or intended to be used to transport food, packages, merchandise, or other items for commercial delivery, and may be operated remotely, semi-autonomously, autonomously, or by a combination of remote-control and automated functions; and
WHEREAS, personal delivery devices are an emerging technology whose operation in the public right-of-way may provide convenience to consumers and businesses, but also raises unresolved local issues regarding pedestrian safety, accessibility, traffic control compliance, right-of-way obstruction, device size and speed, stopping and dwelling, interaction with driveways and alleys, crosswalk operations, emergency response, insurance, indemnity, data reporting, enforcement, and operator responsibility; and
WHEREAS, the City has observed, received reports of, or has reason to anticipate the deployment of personal delivery devices on sidewalks and other portions of the public right-of-way within Glendale without a comprehensive local regulatory program governing permits/licenses, operating conditions, fleet size, approved routes or zones, hours of operation, device specifications, incident reporting, data reporting, customer service, indemnification, insurance, removal, impoundment, or penalties; and WHEREAS, without local operating standards and an enforceable regulatory program, the deployment of personal delivery devices may create conflicts with pedestrians and other lawful users of the public right-of-way, particularly in commercial districts, transit-adjacent areas, high-pedestrian corridors, narrow sidewalks, construction zones, special event areas, and locations with existing sidewalk congestion; and
145 of 745

1 6
9 1
8 WHEREAS, maintaining a clear and accessible pedestrian path of travel is essential to ensuring that sidewalks and crossings remain usable by persons with disabilities, including persons using wheelchairs, walkers, canes, service animals, or other mobility aids, and by persons with visual or hearing impairments who may have difficulty detecting, anticipating, or avoiding a motorized device operating on a sidewalk or at a crosswalk; and
WHEREAS, personal delivery devices may stop, dwell, queue, stage, park, or become disabled in locations that obstruct sidewalks, curb ramps, building entrances, transit stops, crosswalks, driveways, fire access areas, loading zones, outdoor dining areas, or other locations where obstruction may create safety, accessibility, or operational impacts; and
WHEREAS, the City requires time to evaluate whether, and under what conditions, personal delivery devices may safely and appropriately operate in Glendale's public right-of-way, including whether a pilot program, permit program, geographic limitations, fleet caps, speed limits, operating-hour restrictions, insurance requirements, indemnification requirements, data reporting requirements, device identification requirements, local-contact requirements, enforcement mechanisms, removal procedures, or complete prohibition should be adopted; and WHEREAS, a temporary moratorium will preserve the status quo and prohibit deployment and operation of personal delivery devices while the City studies existing and potential impacts, consults with affected departments and stakeholders, evaluates practices adopted by other jurisdictions, assesses staffing and enforcement needs, and prepares appropriate local regulations for City Council consideration; and WHEREAS, allowing unregulated deployment of personal delivery devices while the City studies these issues could result in operational patterns, business reliance, public expectations, or right-of-way impacts that may make later regulation more difficult and could undermine the City's ability to protect pedestrian safety, accessibility, and the orderly management of the public right-of-way; and
WHEREAS, the prohibition imposed by this Ordinance is limited in scope and duration, applies only to the deployment or operation of personal delivery devices in the public right-of-way, does not prohibit traditional human delivery services, and does not regulate the content of speech or favor or disfavor any particular business based on viewpoint, message, or commodity delivered; and
WHEREAS, the Council finds this Ordinance is a reasonable and necessary interim measure to protect the public health, safety, and welfare while the City develops a comprehensive regulatory approach tailored to Glendale's local conditions; and WHEREAS, the Council further finds that the moratorium is necessary to protect pedestrian safety, accessibility for persons with disabilities, the orderly use and management of the public right-of-way, and the City's ability to adopt and enforce 146 of 745

1 6
9 1
8 regulations before personal delivery devices become more widely deployed within the City; and
WHEREAS, the Council desires to direct City staff to study and return with recommendations regarding appropriate long-term regulation of personal delivery devices; and
WHEREAS, the Council finds that the adoption of this Ordinance is consistent with the City's police powers and its authority to regulate the use of City streets, sidewalks, and other public places in order to protect public health, safety, welfare, accessibility, and the orderly use of the public right-of-way; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the absence of this temporary moratorium creates a present risk that personal delivery devices may operate on sidewalks, curb ramps, crosswalks, parkways, transit stops, and other portions of the public right-of-way in a manner that obstructs pedestrian travel, interferes with disability access, creates conflicts with pedestrians and vehicles, or impairs the orderly and safe use of the public right-of-way; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that immediate effectiveness is necessary because the City currently lacks a comprehensive local permit program or operating standards specifically designed to address personal delivery devices in the right-of-way, including standards for device identification, local operator contacts, emergency removal, response to disabled or abandoned devices, required reporting of collisions or near misses, and procedures to ensure that sidewalks, curb ramps, and accessible paths of travel remain unobstructed; and
WHEREAS, for the reasons stated in this Ordinance, the Council finds and declares that this Ordinance is necessary as an urgency measure for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety, and that the facts constituting the urgency are the existing absence of comprehensive local regulation for personal delivery devices, the potential for immediate or expanded deployment in the public right- of-way, the risks to pedestrian safety and disability access, and the need to preserve the status quo while the City studies and adopts appropriate regulations; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA:

SECTION 1. Incorporation. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein, as is the information contained in the Reports to Council dated March 31, 2026 and June 23, 2026.

SECTION 2. Definitions. As used herein, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings ascribed to them, unless otherwise noted:
147 of 745

1 6
9 1
8 “Personal delivery device” (“PDD”) means any motorized device, excluding any conveyance regulated under the California Vehicle Code, that is manufactured for transporting goods, products, or other items on a public right-of-way and equipped with automated and/or manual operation technology, including software and hardware, and which may be a device that operates with the remote support and supervision of a human, or a device that operates without the remote support and supervision of a human.
“Public right-of-way” means any public highway, street, alley, sidewalk, parkway, paseo, and all extensions or additions thereto which is either owned, operated, or controlled by the city, or is subject to an easement or dedication to the city.

SECTION 3. Prohibition. No person shall deploy or operate, or cause to be deployed or operated, a personal delivery device on any public right-of-way in the city.

SECTION 4. Penalties and Remedies. It shall be a misdemeanor to do any act prohibited by this Ordinance, and such violations shall be punishable in accordance with Glendale Municipal Code Section 1.20.010. Violations of this Ordinance may also be subject to administrative code enforcement remedies pursuant to the administrative code enforcement remedies and procedures under Chapter 1.24 of the Glendale Municipal Code, or may be deemed a public nuisance and may be enforced by an action for injunction or civil penalties as provided in the Glendale Municipal Code, or may be addressed by any other remedy authorized by law.

SECTION 5. Study. The Council hereby directs City staff to further study and prepare draft regulations for personal delivery devices, including but not limited to a permitting structure, operating standards, fleet limitations, operating distances, geographic restrictions, hours of operation, levels of automation, insurance and indemnity, ADA and accessibility requirements, device identification, data reporting, incident reporting, penalties, impoundment, administrative remedies, and coordination among City departments including Public Works, Police, Fire, Community Development, Economic Development, and the City Attorney's Office, as directed by Council; and SECTION 6. Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act. The City Council finds and determines that this Ordinance is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301, in that it consists of the operation of existing public facilities, namely, existing highways and streets, sidewalks, and similar facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. Moreover, the City Council finds and determines with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment; thus, it is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061, subdivision (b)(3).

SECTION 7. Urgency. By the Council's making the findings and determinations of fact which the Council declares to constitute an urgency for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety, or welfare, the Council hereby declares that this Ordinance is an urgency measure pursuant to City of Glendale Charter Article VI, Section 7, which 148 of 745

1 6
9 1
8 becomes effective immediately upon adoption by an affirmative vote of at least four-fifths (4/5ths) of the members of the City Council.

SECTION 8. Severability. This Ordinance is adopted under the authority of the Charter of the City of Glendale. If any section, subsection, clause or phrase is declared invalid or otherwise void by a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall not affect any remaining provisions hereof. In this regard, the Council finds and declares that it would have adopted this measure notwithstanding any partial invalidity hereof.

SECTION 9. Effectiveness. This Ordinance shall go into effect immediately upon its adoption and shall be of no further force and effect ___________ thereafter, unless extended by further action of the Council.

Passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale on the _____ day of _______________, 2026.
____________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
City Clerk
149 of 745

1 6
9 1
8 STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS.

CITY OF GLENDALE )
I, Suzie Abajian Ph.D., City Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. ___________ was passed by a 4/5ths vote of the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the _____ day of _____________, 2026, and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote.

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
______________________________
City Clerk
150 of 745

M O T I O N
Moved by Council Member _________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that with respect to the Report to Council dated June 23, 2026 (“Report”) regarding personal delivery devices (PDDs) on public rights-of way, the Council directs staff to prepare draft regulations pertaining to PDDs including but not limited to permitting structure, operating standards, fleet limitations, operating distances, geographic restrictions, hours of operation, levels of automation, insurance and indemnity, ADA and accessibility requirements, device identification, data reporting, incident reporting, penalties, impoundment, and administrative remedies, as follows:

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
151 of 745

From: TJ Passarella
To: Kassakhian, Ardashes; Brotman, Daniel; Golanian, Roubik; Gharpetian, Vartan; Takhtalian, John; Asatryan, Elen; Garcia, Michael J.

Subject: Are Food Delivery Robots Right For Glendale
Date: Thursday, June 18, 2026 7:15:20 AM
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Council & Staff,
Sidewalks are for people......period, full stop, end of story!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zn8YDGRGiPQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gj6JDkx3A6k
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/gshCVVhHZwo
See You next Tuesday night,
Tony Passarella
152 of 745

From: TJ Passarella
To: Golanian, Roubik; Asatryan, Elen; Kassakhian, Ardashes; Brotman, Daniel; Gharpetian, Vartan; Takhtalian, John; Garcia, Michael J.

Subject: ABC News Chicago
Date: Monday, June 22, 2026 6:45:08 AM
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Council & Staff,
Please watch this news report from ABC Chicago. Food delivery robots crash. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OFbWE3K9-k
Can't wait to see you on Tuesday. You gave me to swings at this. Millions for ADA cut out ramps on same night as food delivery robots vote. The contradiction of the century.

BRILLIANT!
Thank you!!!
Tony Passarella
153 of 745

From: TJ Passarella
To: Brotman, Daniel; Asatryan, Elen; Kassakhian, Ardashes; Golanian, Roubik; Gharpetian, Vartan; Takhtalian, John; Garcia, Michael J.

Subject: A I Fail
Date: Friday, June 19, 2026 7:15:33 AM
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links, open attachments, or reply if you are unsure as to the sender.

Council & Staff,
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/vgL1SX4_e5Q
Se you on tuesday,
Tony Passarella
154 of 745

155 of 745

156 of 745

157 of 745

158 of 745

159 of 745

10b
26-90174

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: North Hollywood to Pasadena Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Project Cooperative Agreement
1) Motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to conclude negotiations and execute a Cooperative Agreement with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for the design and construction of the North Hollywood to Pasadena Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Project, in substantially the form presented to the City Council, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney.

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for June 23, 2026 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) is advancing the North Hollywood to Pasadena Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Project (Project), a regional bus rapid transit project intended to connect North Hollywood, Burbank, Glendale, Eagle Rock, and Pasadena through a combination of local roadway and freeway segments.

The Project includes improvements within the City of Glendale and requires continued coordination between Metro and the City regarding design review, permitting, utility adjustments, construction activities in the public right-of-way, traffic control, inspection and acceptance, reimbursement, and future operation and maintenance responsibilities.

The purpose of this report is for the City Council to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a Cooperative Agreement with Metro for the design and construction of the Project as it relates to the City of Glendale. The Cooperative Agreement will establish the procedures, roles, responsibilities, and cost reimbursement framework necessary for the City and Metro to coordinate project delivery within Glendale.

Approval of this action will set up the formal framework needed to coordinate delivery of the Glendale portion of the Project, including City review, permitting, construction coordination, reimbursement of eligible City costs, and coordination of future operation and maintenance responsibilities.
160 of 745

10b2
26-90174
6 8
8 1

RECOMMENDATION
Approve a motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to conclude negotiations and execute a Cooperative Agreement between the City of Glendale and Metro for the design and construction of the Project, in substantially the form presented to the City Council, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney.

ANALYSIS
The Project is a regional transportation project being advanced by Metro to provide premium bus rapid transit service between the San Fernando and San Gabriel Valleys.

The Project corridor extends approximately 19 miles and is planned to serve major activity, employment, commercial, entertainment, and residential destinations within North Hollywood, Burbank, Glendale, Eagle Rock, and Pasadena. The Project is intended to improve transit reliability, provide faster and more competitive transit service, and improve regional connections for residents, employees, and visitors traveling within the corridor.

The Project will include a combination of mixed-flow and dedicated bus lane segments, station improvements, transit priority features, and related roadway, utility, traffic signal, pedestrian, accessibility, and streetscape elements. Because a portion of the Project will be located within Glendale, Metro and the City must coordinate on work affecting City rights-of-way, City facilities, City-owned utilities, permitting, traffic operations, and long-term maintenance responsibilities.

Metro certified the Final Environmental Impact Report and approved the Project on April 28, 2022. Since that time, Metro and City staff have continued to coordinate on design, constructability, traffic operations, utility conflicts, permitting, maintenance responsibilities, and other matters necessary to advance the Glendale portion of the Project.

The proposed Cooperative Agreement is intended to provide the framework for this coordination. The Agreement generally addresses the following key areas:
• Project scope, schedule, and the City portion of the Project; • Roles and responsibilities between Metro and the City during design, construction, and future operation and maintenance coordination;
• Design review, plan submittal, permitting, and City standard requirements; • Construction requirements for work in the public right-of-way, including traffic control, inspection, acceptance, and closeout procedures; • Utility adjustment coordination, including work involving City-owned utilities; • Annual work planning, Form 60 preparation, work orders, reimbursement procedures, and credits;
• Betterment procedures for improvements requested by the City that are beyond the required Project scope;
• Insurance, warranty, indemnity, and dispute resolution provisions; and • Principles for future operation and maintenance responsibilities between Metro and the City.
161 of 745

10b3
26-90174
6 8
8 1
Under the proposed agreement, Metro may deliver design and construction activities directly or through Metro contractors. The City’s role will include review and approval of activities consistent with the agreement, coordination of permits and public right-of-way requirements, coordination of City facilities and utilities, and performance of City work or support services when authorized through approved work orders. Eligible City costs would be reimbursed in accordance with the work order and annual work plan procedures established in the agreement.

The agreement also recognizes that future operation and maintenance responsibilities will need to be further defined. The Cooperative Agreement includes general operation and maintenance principles; however, the City and Metro are expected to work on a separate agreement amendment to address post-construction operation, maintenance, and related responsibilities in greater detail before those obligations become effective.

At the time this report was prepared, the Cooperative Agreement remained subject to final coordination between the City and Metro. The City and Metro legal teams have been negotiating the agreement language, including remaining items related to betterments. Staff is requesting authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to conclude the negotiations and execute the agreement in substantially the form presented to the City Council, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney.

Approval of this action will not, by itself, approve final project design details, appropriate construction funds, establish post-construction maintenance responsibilities, or waive any required City approvals. Future City actions, permits, work orders, reimbursements, budget appropriations, or operation and maintenance obligations will be processed in accordance with the final agreement, any future operation and maintenance agreement, and applicable City procedures.

The Cooperative Agreement establishes a process for Metro to reimburse the City for eligible costs related to the Project. These may include City staff time, consultant support, plan review, inspection, acceptance, closeout, utility coordination, and other City support services requested or required for the Project. These costs would be authorized through future Work Orders and Annual Work Plans, as applicable.

Furthermore, any City-requested improvements beyond the required Project scope, also known as betterments, would be handled separately in accordance with the agreement and would remain subject to applicable City approvals and budget appropriations.

Future operation and maintenance responsibilities may result in City costs for City facilities within the public right-of-way. However, these costs are not being approved at this time and will depend on the final Project scope and a future operation and maintenance agreement to be executed between the City and Metro. Any required future City funding appropriation needs will be presented to the City Council through the City’s budget process or separate Council action, as applicable. 162 of 745

10b4
26-90174
6 8
8 1

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Metro is the lead agency responsible for the overall Project development, environmental clearance, regional coordination, and public outreach for the Project. City staff will continue to support coordination with Metro as it relates to the Glendale portion of the Project, including coordination on design review, construction impacts, permitting, utility adjustments, traffic operations, public outreach, and maintenance responsibilities.

Internal coordination has included, and will continue to include, Public Works, the City Attorney’s Office, Water and Power, Police, Fire, and other City departments as needed based on the Project scope and potential impacts. Additional stakeholder and public coordination will occur as the Project advances through design, preconstruction, and construction phases.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no immediate fiscal impact associated with this report, and no appropriation is requested at this time. The requested action authorizes execution of an interagency Cooperative Agreement, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
Metro, as the lead agency for the Project, conducted environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and an Environmental Impact Report was prepared pursuant to 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15080 et seq. and was certified by the Metro Board of Directors on April 28, 2022. The action under consideration is limited to authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a Cooperative Agreement between the City and Metro for design and construction coordination related to the North Hollywood to Pasadena Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Project. The City’s authorization to execute the Cooperative Agreement is administrative in nature and is not a separate project under CEQA.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1: Do not approve the motion authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute the Cooperative Agreement with Metro for the North Hollywood to Pasadena Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Project. This alternative would delay the City’s ability to establish a formal agreement with Metro for the Glendale portion of the Project, including procedures for design review, permitting, construction coordination, utility adjustments, reimbursements, and future operation and maintenance responsibilities.
163 of 745

10b5
26-90174
6 8
8 1

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Daniel Hernandez, Director of Public Works
Prepared by:

Sarkis Oganesyan, Deputy Director of Public Works/ City Engineer Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: Draft Cooperative Agreement
Exhibit 2: Project Location Map/Vicinity Map
164 of 745

MOTION
Moved by Council Member , seconded
by Council Member , that the Council of the City of
Glendale hereby authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to conclude negotiations with Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“Metro”) and execute a Cooperative Agreement between the City of Glendale and Metro for the design and construction of the North Hollywood to Pasadena Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Project. Said agreement shall be in substantially the form presented as Exhibit 1 to the Report to Council dated June 23, 2026, and subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney.

Votes as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:

City Clerk
165 of 745

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR THE DESIGN AND

CONSTRUCTION OF THE NORTH HOLLYWOOD TO PASADENA BUS

RAPID TRANSIT CORRIDOR PROJECT

BETWEEN

THE CITY OF GLENDALE
AND

THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION

AUTHORITY
2026

EFFECTIVE DATE

166 of 745

CONTENTS

ARTICLE PAGE
ARTICLE 1. SCOPE AND DURATION ............................................................................................................ ... 1 ARTICLE 2. GENERAL OBLIGATIONS .............................................................................................................. 2 ARTICLE 3. DESIGN ........................................................................................................................ ................ 98 ARTICLE 4. CONSTRUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 11 ARTICLE 5. BETTERMENTS ................................................................................................................... .... 1312 ARTICLE 6. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ......................................................................................... 1413 ARTICLE 7. REIMBURSEMENT AND CREDITS ............................................................................................. 14 ARTICLE 8. INDEMNITY, WARRANTIES AND INSURANCE ...................................................................... 1716 ARTICLE 9. RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES ...................................................................................................... 19 ARTICLE 10. MISCELLANEOUS .................................................................................................................... 20 ARTICLE 11. DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION ............................................................................... 2423 EXHIBIT 1 – PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................ 3332 EXHIBIT 2 – PROJECT PHASES AND PROJECT SCHEDULE ....................................................................... 3433 EXHIBIT 3 – PROJECT SITE....................................................................................................... ...................... 3635 EXHIBIT 4 – ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ................................................................................................ 3736 EXHIBIT 5 – UTILITY ADJUSTMENT PROCEDURES ...................................................................................... 4140 EXHIBIT 6 – DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................................................... 4544 EXHIBIT 7 – LACMTA SUBMITTAL REVIEW PROCEDURE ............................................................................ 4746 EXHIBIT 8 – CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................ 4948 EXHIBIT 9 – INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE....................................................................... 5453 EXHIBIT 10 - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PRINCIPLES ...................................................................... 5756 EXHIBIT 11 –FORMS ........................................................................................................................................ 5857 EXHIBIT 12 – CITY-PERFORMED PROJECT WORK ...................................................................................... 6564 167 of 745

1 This Agreement is entered into by and between the City of Glendale (the "City"), and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("LACMTA").

RECITALS
(A) LACMTA proposes to develop and open a new bus ra pid transit line known as the North Hollywood to Pasadena Transit Corridor Project (as more fully defined in Article 11 ( Definitions and Interpretation), the "NoHo to Pasadena Project "). The Final Environmental Impact Report was certified and the NoHo to Pasadena Project was approved, by the LACM TA Board of Directors on April 28, 2022 (https://www.dropbox.com/sh/jt5s5l784pml8cf/AAAK4TgdarNwfM1iBAmF7xWXa?dl=0). (B) The NoHo to Pasadena Project will serve various cities and communities including the City and the City intends, by this Agreement, to facilitate the devel opment and implementation of the NoHo to Pasadena Project and in particular the City Portion of the NoHo to Pasadena Project. (C) This Agreement does not address, and is not int ended to address any terms and conditions with respect to any first/last mile projects. Any terms and conditions with respect to any first/last mile projects will be discussed, negotiated and agreed by LACMTA and the City under a separate agreement. Further, this Agreement does not address, and is not intended to address any terms and conditions with respect to LACMTA Board's Land Bank Pilot Partnership with Los Angeles County Motion (June 2022 and any other relevant dates). Any City participation in, and the terms and conditions with respect to any City participation in, any such programs and initiatives would be discussed, negotiated and agreed to by responsible parties under a separate agreement. The City disclaims any liabilit y arising out of or related to the Land Bank Pilot Partnership Motion (June 2022) under this Agreement.
(D) LACMTA and the City wish to enter into this Agreement in order to identify the rights and obligations between them in connection with the development and implementation of the NoHo to Pasadena Project.

In consideration of the mutual covenants of the Parties as set out below, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1. SCOPE AND DURATION

1.1 Scope of Agreement
(a) The City acknowledges th e NoHo to Pasadena Project is a high priority public works project and will provide LACMTA with expedited review and approval procedures in connection with design, design reviews, permitting, and other authority to be exercised by the City relating to the NoHo to Pasadena Project in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. (b) The Parties have entered into this Agreement to:
(i) acknowledge the intended scope, schedule and site for the NoHo to Pasadena Project as set out in EXHIBIT 1 ( Project Description), EXHIBIT 2 ( Project Phases and Project Schedule ) and EXHIBIT 3 (Project Site) respectively; and
(ii) define the applicable procedures, manage the interfaces and regulate the roles and responsibilities and allocation of costs between LACMTA and the City, in respect of the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of the NoHo to Pasadena Project as it relates to the City Portion and any Rearrangements.
(c) LACMTA may procure the Design, Construction, operation, and maintenance of the NoHo to Pasadena Project, including the City Portion, under multiple procurements and contract packages and may self-perform parts of the design, construc tion, operation, and maintenance of the NoHo to Pasadena Project, including the City Portion. As at the date of this Agreement, LACMTA:
(i) has procured the development of the Design for the NoHo to Pasadena Project to approved- for-construction status by a LACMTA Contractor under one contractual package; and 168 of 745

2 (ii) is procuring the performanc e of Design reviews, preconstruction services, and Construction work under a construction manager/general contractor agreement. (d) The City acknowledges and agrees that LACMTA may: (i) engage LACMTA Contractor(s) to carry out Design, Construction, operation and/or maint enance work with respect to the City Portion including the Design and/or Construction of Rearrangements for which it is responsible for performing (and excluding any Rearrangements to be performed by the City or a Utility Owner); and (ii) in each LACMTA Contract, require the applicable LACMTA C ontractor to comply wit h certain of LACMTA's obligations under this Agreement provided that nothing in this Agreement will create any contractual relationship between the City and any LACMTA Cont ractor and in accordance with Section 10.11 (Limitation on Third Party Beneficiaries ), nothing contained in this Agreement is intended or will be construed as creating or conferring any rights, benefits or remedies upon, or creating any obligations of the City toward, any LACMTA Contractor.
(e) The City acknowledges and agrees that LACMTA may change the contracting and procurement strategy and plan for the NoHo to Pasadena Pr oject, including the City Portion, described in Section 1.1(c) in its sole discretion. The City fu rther acknowledges that as at the date of this Agreement, the NoHo to Pasadena Project is in the early stages of the Design Phase and LACMTA may elect: (i) not to proceed with the NoHo to Pa sadena Project; or (ii) to amend the scope of the NoHo to Pasadena Project, each in its sole discretion subject to the FEIR and any required board approvals.
(f) LACMTA shall promptly notify t he City of any changes to its contracting and procurement strategy or to the scope of the NoHo to Pasadena Project made in accordance with Section 1.1(e) that has or is reasonably likely to have an impact on the scope, sch edule or roles and responsibilities for the City Portion or the provisions and pr ocedures set out under this Agr eement. The Parties shall use good faith efforts to agree any amendments or supplements to this Agreement necessary to be made as a result of any such change notified by LACMTA to the City. If an amendment or supplement cannot be agreed at the working-level, the issue will be escalated by the Parties for resolution in accordance with the issue resolution ladder set out in EXHIBIT 4 (Roles and Responsibilities). (g) The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be applicable to the rights and obligations of a City- owned utility company with respect to the NoHo to Pasadena Project and LACMTA acknowledges and agrees to coordinate with any City-owned utility with regard to the NoHo to Pasadena Project.

1.2 Duration of Agreement
This Agreement (and all of the rights and obligations under this Agreement) will come into effect on the Effective Date and continue until the first day on which passenger service on the NoHo to Pasadena Project commences, unless terminated earlier in accordance with t he provisions of this Ag reement or extended in accordance with Article 6 (Operation and Maintenance) (the "Term").

1.3 Fiscal Limitations
City’s payment obligations are subject to annual ap propriation by the City Council. The City shall have no obligation to expend funds in excess of amounts appropr iated. Any Work Order or obligation that would exceed appropriated funds shall require prior written approval by the City Council.

ARTICLE 2. GENERAL OBLIGATIONS

2.1 Governance
(a) The roles and responsibilities of the City and LACMTA are set out in EXHIBIT 4 ( Roles and Responsibilities). The Parties agree to use good faith effort s to resolve any issues that arise under this Agreement. Issues that arise under this Agreement that cannot be resolved at the working-level will be escalated by the Parties for resolution in accordance with the issue resolution ladder set out in EXHIBIT 4 (Roles and Responsibilities).
169 of 745

3 (b) The City and LACMTA shall each designate an indivi dual or individuals who will be authorized to make decisions and bind the Parties on ma tters relating to this Agreement (the "City Representative" and "LACMTA Representative" , respectively). EXHIBIT 4 ( Roles and Responsibilities) provides initial designations. Either Party may change its designated representative by providing seven days' prior Notice to the other Party. (c) Where a meeting of multiple cities involved in the NoHo to Pasadena Project may be helpful to discuss issues, or potential issues, and/or solutions that impact multiple cities or to provide an update on the overall status or progress on the NoHo to Pasadena Project, LACMTA will invite the City to the attend the meeting together with other cities, if the City may be directly impacted by the issues or solutions to be discussed. On LACMTA's written request, the City shall endeavor to secure the attendance (in person or via videoconference or teleconference) of the City Representativ e (or a delegate) at any such meeting held with respect to the City Portion during normal business hours and upon reasonable notice. If the City Repres entative is unable to attend any su ch meeting and meeting minutes are prepared, LACMTA will ensure the meeting minutes are distributed to the City. (d) LACMTA may convene Project Meetings in relati on to the NoHo to Pasadena Project or particular aspects of the NoHo to Pasadena Project for t he purposes of providing a non-binding forum for LACMTA, the LACMTA Contractors and other attend ees to monitor the progress of the NoHo to Pasadena Project, to consider issues, or potential issues, and to present, understand and discuss proposed solutions with respect to the NoHo to Pasadena Project. On LACMTA's written request, the City shall endeavor to secure the attendance (in person or via videoconference or teleconference) of the City Representative (or a delegate) at any Project Meeting held with respect to the City Portion during normal business hours and upon reasonable notice. Any Project Meeting attended by the City Representative (or a delegate) is consultative and advisory only and nothing which occurs during any such Project Meeting and no information that is presented during any such Project Meeting will:
(i) affect the rights or obligations of either Party under this Agreement; (ii) entitle a Party to make any claim against the other; (iii) relieve a Party from, or alter or affect, a Part y's liabilities or responsibilities whether under this Agreement or otherwise according to Applicable Law;
(iv) prejudice a Party's rights against the other Pa rty whether under this Agreement or otherwise according to Applicable Law; or
(v) be construed as a direction by a Party to do or not do anything.

2.2 Annual Work Plan
(a) At the beginning of each LACMTA Fiscal Year, the Parties will review the Project Schedule and the 'life of project' resourcing needs to facilitate the efficient, timely, and safe delivery of each Subject Transportation Project through its Design Phas e and Construction Phase and will commence the Annual Work Plan process for the next LACMTA Fiscal Year. LACMTA and the City will cooperate to develop an agreed Annual Work Plan for each LACMTA Fiscal Year during the Term, in accordance with the following provisions:
(i) not later than July 31 (or in the case of t he first partial LACMTA Fiscal Year during the Term, no later than 30 days after the date of this Ag reement), LACMTA shall provide the City with information with respect to anticipated Work Order s, including a list of each item of work or scope of activities or services that LACMTA anticipates to r equest or require from the City during the next LACMTA Fiscal Year, and the estimated start and finish dates for the item of work or scope of activities or services that LACMTA anticipates to request or require from the City, and the anticipated funding sources for such work; 170 of 745

4 (ii) within 60 days after the City's receipt of the required information from LACMTA pursuant to Section 2.2(a)(i), the City shall submit a preliminary annual work plan to LACMTA for the next LACMTA Fiscal Year, which will include an estimate of the Costs under the anticipated Work Orders for which the City shall require reimbursement;
(iii) promptly and in any event within 30 days' after LACMTA receives the preliminary annual work plan from the City pursuant to Section 2.2(a)(ii), the City and LACMTA will meet to review the preliminary work plan and negotiate in good fait h such issues as are necessary in order to finalize and agree the annual work plan for the next LACMTA Fiscal Year. The City shall be responsible for obtaining the requisite approvals from the City of Glendale City Council for the budget appropriations for the preliminary work plan; and (iv) not later than May 1 of the then current LA CMTA Fiscal Year, LACMTA shall notify the City of the agreed annual work plan for the next LACMTA Fiscal Year (each such agreed annual work plan, an "Annual Work Plan").
(b) Section 2.3(e) ( Work Orders) shall apply notwithstanding that the Parties may agree an Annual Work Plan setting out the schedule of anticipated Work Orders.

2.3 Work Orders
(a) If the City is required to perform work and/or prov ide support and/or services under the provisions of this Agreement or LACMTA requests that the Ci ty perform work and/or provide support and/or services under the provisions of this Agreement (including ins pection, acceptance, and closeout activities in accordance with Section 2.3(e)), eac h City department that is required to perform work shall be responsible for submitting a Form 60 to LA CMTA to estimate the total effort and Costs for which the department shall require reimbursement with respect to that scope of work. (b) If LACMTA approves a Form 60 submitted to it by the City with respect to a scope of work under Section 2.3(a) without requiring any changes or additions, LACMTA will issue a Work Order to the City for such scope of work and following receip t of that Work Order, the City must promptly commence the work authorized under that Work Order. Should the City incur an increase in its costs as stated in the submitted Form 60 due to LACMTA's delay in authorization of a Work Order for a reason other than good faith negotiations under Se ction 2.3(d), the City may submit a revised Form 60 (or, if LACMTA subsequently issues a Work Order, may request a change under Section 2.3(g)) and the Parties shall negotiate in good faith any changes requested by the City. (c) Each Work Order issued by LACMTA to the City in accordance with this Agreement shall specify the work authorized to be performed and any materials or equipment to be acquired, the amount of money that the City will be reimbursed for the authorized work as agreed under the applicable Form 60, and a schedule, including the estimated starting and finishing dates for the authorized work. (d) If LACMTA requests changes or additions (including any additional or supplemental provisions) to a Form 60 submitted to it by the City with respect to a scope of work under Section 2.3(a) prior to issuing a Work Order, the Parties shall negotiate in good faith such changes or additions. Upon agreement of any such changes or additions (and any necessa ry City council approval for such changes or additions), LACMTA will issue a Work Order to the City for the applicable scope of work, with the agreed changes or additions and following receipt of that Work Order, the City must promptly and without delay (and in any case within 10 days of issuance by LACMTA) accept any agreed changes or additions to the applicable Form 60 by counter-s igning the Work Order or otherwise by written acceptance by the City Representative, in each case followed by prompt commencement of the work authorized under that Work Order. Nothing in this Section 2.3(d) shall prohibit LACMTA from approving a Form 60 under Section 2.3(b) in part and authorizing the City to commence the approved part of the scope of work in accordance with that Form 60 unless commencement of the approved part of the scope of work is not practicable without approval of the whole. If the Parties do not agree on whether commencement of an approv ed part of the scope prior to ap proval of the whole of the 171 of 745

5 scope is practicable, the issue sh all be escalated in accordance with the issue resolution ladder set out in EXHIBIT 4 (Roles and Responsibilities).
(e) LACMTA shall reimburse the City for the serv ices and activities performed in accordance with EXHIBIT 9 ( Inspection and Acceptance Procedure ). LACMTA shall not unreasonably withhold issuance of a Work Order author izing the City to perform inspection, acceptance, and closeout activities with respect to the Noho to Pasadena Project required in accordance with EXHIBIT 9 (Inspection and Acceptance Procedure).
(f) The City shall not be authorized to do any work and shall not be paid, credited or reimbursed for costs or expenses associated with any work perform ed in connection with a Rearrangement or the City Portion or otherwise under the provisions of this Agreement, that is not expressly authorized by a Work Order, as may be amended pursuant to Section 2.3(g). (g) Except in the case of a change required due to an emergency (which notification may be given orally and any emergency work commenced before being conf irmed in writing to LACMTA within three days), the City may submit proposed changes to a Wo rk Order in writing to LACMTA for approval, such approval to not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. If approved, the City may perform the work in accordance with the authorized change.
(h) LACMTA may terminate any Work Order at any time at its sole discretion, provided that the City will be entitled to reimbursement in accordance with this Agreement for Costs, if any, already incurred.

To the extent the City (or City Contractor) has commenced Construction in the Public Rights-of-Way pursuant to a Work Order agreed under this Section 2.3 that is subsequently terminated by LACMTA, LACMTA shall reimburse the City for Costs properly incurred pursuant to a Work Order agreed under this Section 2.3 or other wise under Section 8.1 ( Indemnity) of this Agreement to perform clean-up and restoration activities to return the site to t he condition prior to commencement of Construction.

The restorative activities shall be consistent with the City Standards in effect at the time the restoration work is performed. The City may terminate a Work Order if City resources are unavailable to perform the anticipated Work Order due to a delay in approval by LACTMA or if LACTMA fails to timely make payments to the City.
(i) The City shall promptly notify LACM TA if at any time it anticipates:
(i) exceeding 75% of the total estimated Cost s under any Work Order within the next 60 days; (ii) that the total Costs under any Work Order will be in excess of 10% greater than previously estimated Costs; or
(iii) that the estimated finishing date will be later than the date stated in the Work Order, and shall request an amendment to such Work Order pursuant to Section 2.3(g).

2.4 Project Schedule
(a) The City agrees to cooperate and coordinate with LA CMTA in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement in order for LACMTA to achieve the Project Schedule and subject to LACMTA agreeing to the reimbursement of the cost of the applicable resources in accordance with Section 2.3 ( Work Orders) and 7.1 ( Reimbursements to the City ), to allocate sufficient staff and other resources necessary to provide the level of service required to meet the scope of work and work schedules, review periods and timelines identified in this Agreement and any Work Orders. If the City determines that, notwithstanding its compliance with its obligations under this Section 2.4(a), additional personnel or other resources (including through the use of City Contractors) are required to mitigate the risk of delay in performing the scope of work within the defined schedule, the City may submit a proposed change to the Work Order in accordance with Section 2.3(g) (Work Orders). 172 of 745

6 (b) To the extent the City fails to carry out any work or obligations fo r which it is responsible under the provisions of this Agreement and/or any Work Or der in accordance with the work schedules, review periods and timelines identified in this Agreement and the applicable Work Order (in each case, as may be extended under Section 2.4(d)), and the City' s failure to carry out its obligation is solely attributable to the City (and not to an event of Force Majeure or LACMTA) and directly causes: (i) LACMTA to incur additional costs; or (ii) a delay to the NoHo to Pasadena Project, the City must reimburse LACMTA for all actual and documented costs and expenses incurred by LACMTA or arising out of such delay. The City shall pay such costs to LACMTA within 90 days of receiving an invoice from LACMTA. If the Parties agree, LACM TA may deduct the amount due from the City to LACMTA pursuant to this Section 2.4(b) from payment(s) due to the City. (c) Without limiting any other rights under this Section 2.4, if the Cit y fails to carry out any work or obligations for which it is responsible under the pr ovisions of this Agreement in accordance with the work schedules, review periods and timelines identified in this Agreement and the applicable Work Order (in each case, as may be extended under Section 2.4(d)), LACMTA (or a LACMTA Contractor) will issue a Notice to the City referencing the relev ant work or obligation (i ncluding any anticipated delay and cost impacts to the NoHo to Pas adena Project) and requesting the City's immediate attention (or, if the Project Sched ule allows without causing LACMTA to incur additional costs or a delay to the NoHo to Pasadena Project, providi ng an extension of time) and if the delay remains unresolved, LACMTA shall escalate the delay utilizing the issue resolution ladder set out in EXHIBIT 4 (Roles and Responsibilities). Where the delayed obligation relates to Design or Construction work that the City has agreed to perform under the terms of this Agreement or where LACMTA reasonably determines that the City will be unable to timely comple te any Design or Construction work that the City has agreed to perform under the terms of this Agreement, LACMTA may by Notice to the City suspend the affected element of the City's work and LACMTA may perform the remaining work. If LACMTA takes over work in accordance with this Section 2.4(c), the City shall cooperate and assist LACMTA in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. (d) To the extent:
(i) a failure by LACMTA to perform its work and obligations in accordance with the work schedules, review periods and timelines identified in this Agreement and/or any Work Order; or
(ii) the rejection by LACMTA of a reasonable r equest by the City for additional resources under Section 2.4(a),
results in a delay to the perform ance of the City's work under a Wo rk Order, the City will be entitled to an equivalent extension to the affected deadline and any other relief expressly contemplated under the provisions of the applicable Work Order (including, where the City is performing Design or Construction work, any costs associated with such delay).

2.5 Permits
(a) Under Applicable Law, LACMTA is not subject to certain local ordinances when constructing the City Portion. Notwithstanding this, LACMTA shall obt ain all necessary City permits and approvals and comply with City Standards relating to the Design and Construction of the City Portion, in each case to the extent required under and in accord ance with, the terms of this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City’s police powers or authority to impose and enforce regulations necessary to protect public health, safety, and welfare. (b) Without prejudice to Section 2.5(a) or the requirements set out in EXHIBIT 8 ( Construction Requirements):
(i) within 45 days of the Effective Date, the City and LACMTA will coordinate to: identify any permits required for the City Portion; agree on any applicable permit fees required to be paid 173 of 745

7 by LACMTA with respect to the City Portion; and agree on any services that will not require reimbursement by LACMTA through a Work Order to avoid double counting; (ii) LACMTA or a LACMTA Contractor shall pay any permit fees agreed by the Parties under Section 2.5(b)(i); and
(iii) the City will cooperate with LA CMTA to ensure any processing procedures or timelines for permits shall be consistent with the terms and conditions set out in this Agreement and endeavor to reasonably the permit process so far as reasonably practicable to support the timely delivery of the Noho to Pasadena Project in accordance with the Project Schedule. (c) If requested by LACMTA, the City will provide r easonable assistance to LACMTA and the LACMTA Contractors in relation to any application by LACM TA or a LACMTA Contractor for a Governmental Approval or other Governmental Entity or third-par ty approval relating to or arising from, the Design and Construction, of the City Portion.

2.6 Coordination of Work
(a) Except in the case of Adjacent Work required as a result of an emergency (which notification and coordination may occur as soon as reasonably prac ticable after the occurrence of the emergency), the City will promptly not ify LACMTA upon becoming aware of any proposed or planned Adjacent Work and will take all reasonable actions within its powers, to coordinate the design and performance of any Adjacent Work with LACMTA so that such Adjacent Work shall not pose a safety hazard or interfere with, disrupt or delay the Design and Construction, or threaten the integrity of the City Portion including by:
(i) complying with the provisions of this Se ction 2.6 and LACMTA's standard procedures for Adjacent Works;
(ii) to the extent requested by LACMTA following its initial screening taking into account proximity of the Adjacent Work to the City Portion, adjacency conditions, and the potential to impact the City Portion and otherwise conducted in accordance with LACMTA's standard procedures for Adjacent Works, delivering copies of designs and plans for the Adjacent Work to LACMTA and giving LACMTA the right to review and comment on the designs and plans for the Adjacent Work and to approve the final designs and plans for the Adjacent Work to determine if elements of the Adjacent Work would impact the safe Construction of the NoHo to Pasadena Project; and
(iii) to the extent LACMTA reas onably determines and promptly notifies the City that the Adjacent Work will, in whole or in part, pose a safety hazard or interfere with, disrupt or delay the Design, Construction, operation or maintenance of, or threaten the integrity of, the City Portion, LACMTA and City agree to coordinat ing the Adjacent Work or suspending the Adjacent Work or the relevant part of the Adjacent Work (as applicable). (b) The City will, and will take all reasonable actions wit hin its powers to ensure that any City Contractor or third party performing any Adjacent Work, City Construction Work or City Maintenance Work is obligated under contract and/or a permit process to:
(i) co-operate and coordinate with LACMTA and the LACMTA Contractors including:
(A) attending interface definition and coordinat ion meetings upon reasonable request; and
(B) providing any other interface data reas onably requested by LACMTA or the relevant LACMTA Contractor and necessary to complete interface coordination; 174 of 745

8 (ii) perform the Adjacent Work, City Construction Work or City Maintenance Work (as applicable) so as to minimize any interference with or di sruption or delay to construction of the City Portion or any other part of the NoHo to Pasadena Project; (iii) to the extent applicable, co mply with LACMTA or the relevant LACMTA Contractor's worksite health and safety policies and procedures; and
(iv) promptly advise LACMTA of all matters arising out of the Adjacent Work or City Construction Work or City Maintenance Work (as applicable) that may interfere with, disrupt, delay or otherwise have an adverse effect upon the City Po rtion or any other part of the NoHo to Pasadena Project.

2.7 Utility Adjustments
(a) In accordance with Section 1.1 ( Scope of Agreement ), LACMTA and the City will cooperate and coordinate in performing the steps necessary to endeavor to ensure that applicable Utility owners implement the Utility Adjustments necessary to ad dress Utility Conflicts t hat will impact the City Portion of a Project in a timely manner, including LACMTA and the City each exchanging information, participating in coordination meetin gs, coordinating in the issuance of notices to Utility owners requesting a Utility Adjustment, and performing the othe r steps and activities set out in EXHIBIT 5 (Utility Adjustment Procedures ). LACMTA acknowledges that different City departments will have their own independent requirements such as, but not limited to, some departments requiring LACMTA to prepare Design Documentation for City’s review and approval, with other departments preferring to prepare their own Design Documentation.
(b) LACMTA and the City shall cooperate and coordi nate in executing the necessary documents for each step set out in EXHIBIT 5 (Utility Adjustment Procedures). (c) The services performed by the City under the prov isions of this Section 2.7, are eligible for reimbursement under Sections 2.2 (Annual Work Plan), 2.3 (Work Orders) and 7.1 (Reimbursements to the City).

2.8 Governmental and Lender Requirements
If the NoHo to Pasadena Project is subject to financial assistance provided by loan agreements with the U.S.

Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administ ration, other federal, state and local Governmental Entities, and/or financial institutions providing grants , funding or financing, the Parties will comply with any prescribed governmental and lender requirements set out in a Work Order or otherwise under the applicable grant, funding or financing agreements notified to the City provided that LACMTA notifies the City of the funding sources and requirements prior to issuing the Work Order.

2.9 Access
If, prior to LACMTA's scheduled date of commencement of Construction work in a part of the City Portion, any Rearrangement is necessary to eliminate a conf lict, the City may grant to LACMTA and/or its designee sufficient rights, if necessary, to allow LACMTA to proc eed with investigation of ex isting conditions and the Construction of that part (limited to Public Rights-of-Way and City-owne d properties only, and not including any privately-owned properties) of the City Portion in accordance wit h the Project Schedule; provided, however, that such grant does not unreasonably and adversely interfere with the provision of City's services to the public, or affect public health and safety; and provided further, that t he City is permitted under Applicable Law to grant such right.

2.10 Discretions
Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Ag reement, all determinations, consents, waivers, or approvals of a Party under this Agreement must not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed. 175 of 745

9 ARTICLE 3. DESIGN

3.1 Design Responsibilities
(a) Except to the extent of any Design work agreed to be performed by the City Department of Water and Power under Section 2.7(a) and 3.1(b), LACMTA will (directly or through LACMTA Contractors) Design all Rearrangements and produce all Design Documentation relevant to those works in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. LACMTA shall be responsible for any errors and omissions in the Design Documentation prepared by LACMTA or a LACMTA Contractor. (b) LACMTA may request (with City's agreem ent) and authorize the City to perform:
(i) Design work and/or provide support services with respect to the Design of a Rearrangement pursuant to the procedures set out under Section 2.3 (Work Orders); and (ii) additional Design work with respect to the Cit y Portion that is not part of any Rearrangement pursuant to the procedures and subject to the requirements set out under EXHIBIT 12 (City- Performed Project Work).

The City shall diligently perform and shall endeavor to ensure that any City Contractor diligently performs, such Design-related activities in accord ance with the provisions of the applicable Work Order and this Agreement. The City shall be responsible for any errors and omissions in any Design Documentation prepared by the City or a City Contractor.

3.2 Design Requirements
The Designs of the Rearrangements shall comply with the requirements se t out in EXHIBIT 6 ( Design Requirements).

3.3 Design Review Procedure
(a) LACMTA will submit, and will require that t he LACMTA Contractors submit, the Designs for any Rearrangements to the City for review in accordance with the procedures set out in EXHIBIT 7 (LACMTA Submittal Review Procedure ) and otherwise in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement and any applicable Work Orders.
(b) The City will carry out the review and approval of the Designs for the Rearrangements in accordance with the procedures and the review periods set out in EXHIBIT 7 ( LACMTA Submittal Review Procedure) and otherwise in accordance with the provis ions of this Agreement and any applicable Work Orders.
(c) For the avoidance of doubt, LACMTA is not requir ed to submit any Design for Construction work for the NoHo to Pasadena Project that is not part of the Rearrangements to the City for City's review and approval, including where:
(i) LACMTA, a LACMTA Contractor, or a tenant or licensee of LACMTA owns and maintains (or will own and maintain) the applicable structure or physical element; or (ii) the work is related to ut ility trenching and shoring within OSHA guidelines and the relevant LACMTA Contractor is OSHA certified.

As between the City and LACMTA, LACMTA will be resp onsible for ensuring that the Design for the Construction work for the NoHo to Pasadena Project complies with Applicable Law and the FEIR.

The City further acknowledges that as between LACMTA and the City, LACMTA has sole discretion to determine whether, and which, f eatures or facilities are required in order for LACMTA to comply with its obligations under Applicable Law in connection with the NoHo to Pasadena Project (whether or not situated within the Public Rights-of-Way) incl uding the ADA and in the case of its obligations 176 of 745

10 under the ADA LACMTA will to determine whether matters are technically infeasible; provided, however, in making such determination, LACMTA shall utilize current rules and regulations promulgated under the ADA, and guidelines issued by federal agencies in accordance with the ADA, including but not limited to The ADA Best Prac tices Tool Kit for State and Local Governments published by Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. As described in Part C (Physical Limits of the Project Work ) of EXHIBIT 3EXHIBIT 3 (Project Site), LACTMA will reimburse the City for Costs incurred by the City or City Contractors for Costs incurred for obligations and requirements under the ADA. LACMTA and the City will agree the physical limits of the structures and elements of the NoHo to Pasadena Project that: (a) LACMTA ow ns and maintains or will own or maintain; or (b) that are part of, or will become part of (under a Rearrangement), a City Facility.

3.4 Design Development
The Parties acknowledge and agree that:
(a) the Basis of Design will establish the scope, limits of work, specifications and requirements applicable to the Designs for any Rearrangements for the purposes of issuance of the Procurement Documents for the construction of the NoHo to Pasadena Project; and (b) the Design Documentation for any Rearrangements will be submitted for review progressively in Packages and LACMTA and the applicable LACMTA Contractor will retain responsibility for defining the scope and timing of delivery of the Packages at each stage of Design.

3.5 City Standards
(a) The City agrees that it shall not adopt any ne w City Standards or otherwise amend or supplement any existing City Standards or its interpretation or application of any existing City Standards, for the sole or primary purpose of affecting the NoHo to Pasadena Project. For the avoidance of doubt, this Agreement and the provisions in th is Section 3.5 do not restrict t he City from exercising its legal authority or legislative power to adopt new City Standards. (b) Subject to Sections 3.5(a) and 3.5(c), the Pa rties acknowledge that t he City may adopt new City Standards not listed in EXHIBIT 6 ( Design Requirements ) or amend or supplement existing City Standards listed in EXHIBIT 6 ( Design Requirements) during the Term, provid ed that the City shall promptly (and in any case within 15 days' of adoption) notify LACMTA of any changes or additions to the City Standards adopted during the Term.
(c) Any changes or additions to the City Standards applicable to a Rearrangement after the establishment of the Basis of Design for t hat Rearrangement or any adoption, amendment, supplement, or interpretation of City Standards fo r the sole purpose of affecting the NoHo to Pasadena Project in contravention of Section 3. 5(a) shall be considered a "Betterment" for the purposes of this Agreement (except to the extent an exclusion under that definition applies).

3.6 Changes to Design
(a) If LACMTA wishes to amend the Final Design for a Rearrangement for which it is responsible prior to completion of Construction of that Rearr angement, it must submit the amended Design Documentation to the City and EXHIBIT 7 (LACMTA Submittal Review Procedure) will apply as if the Design Documentation is for the Final Design.
(b) LACMTA may use or may allow the relevant LA CMTA Contractor to use, the amended Final Design for Construction prior to approval by the City if and only if LACMTA, in consultation with the City Inspector, determines that the amen dment to the Final Design is: (i) minor; (ii) does not adversely impact the relevant Rearrangement; and (iii) is necessary to overcome an issue which has arisen or become evident since the Final Design was initially approved.

3.7 Value Engineering
177 of 745

11 LACMTA and the City will cooperate with each other to identify efficiencies to reduce the overall cost of the Noho to Pasadena Project in order to maximize t he value of public funds. T he City will exercise sound engineering judgment to cooperate and coordinate with LACMTA to identify efficient approaches to the Design of Rearrangements for the Noho to Pasadena Project when:
(a) performing Design reviews under Section 3.3 ( Design Review Procedure ), including as part of the resolution of City comments made to Designs; and
(b) reviewing any requests for deviations to the City Standards.

The Parties acknowledge and agree that this will in clude identifying, and reviewing LACMTA Contractor- identified, recommendations for potential innovations and value engineering opportunities with respect to the Rearrangements that offer value in terms of a reduced capital cost for the Noho to Pasadena Project and/or that will offer value in terms of schedule savings, an d/or quality benefits and adopting and applying those recommendations that, following evaluation by the Part ies, will reduce the capital cost of the Noho to Pasadena Project and/or that will offer value in te rms of schedule savings, and/or quality benefits. Any innovation or value engineering recommendations will be evaluated on the basis that any such recommendation should satisfy the requi red function of the Rearrangement at the lowest total cost (capital, operating, and maintenance) consistent with the requirements of performance, reliability, maintainability, and safety. For the avoidance of doubt, following evaluati on of potential innovations and value engineering opportunities in accordance with this Section3.7, the City retains final decision-making authority to determine whether to approve a deviation from City Standards.

ARTICLE 4. CONSTRUCTION

4.1 Construction Responsibilities
(a) Except to the extent of any Construction work requested to be performed by the City under Section 4.1(b), LACMTA (directly or through t he LACMTA Contractors) will be responsible for the Construction of all Rearrangements and shall dili gently perform and shall ensure that any LACMTA Contractor diligently performs, all such Constructi on in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.
(b) LACMTA may request and authorize the City to perform:
(i) Construction work with respect to a Rear rangement and/or provide Construction support services pursuant to the procedures set out under Section 2.3 (Work Orders); and (ii) additional Construction work with respect to the City Portion that is not part of any Rearrangement pursuant to the procedures and subject to the requirements set out under EXHIBIT 12 (City-Performed Project Work).

The City shall diligently perform and shall endeavor to ensure that any City Contractor diligently performs, all such Construction work and/or support services in accordance with the provisions of the applicable Work Order and this Agreement.

4.2 Construction Requirements
The Construction of the Rearrangements and any other Construction work performed in the Public Rights-of- Way in connection with the NoHo to Pasadena Project shall comply with the requirements set out in EXHIBIT 8 (Construction Requirements).

4.3 Rights-of-Way
(a) Notwithstanding any LACMTA rights to use the Pu blic Rights-of-Way under Applicable Law, LACMTA shall obtain all necessary City permits and approval s and comply with all City Standards relating to 178 of 745

12 use of the Public Rights-of-Way, in each case to the extent required under and in accordance with, the terms of this Agreement.
(b) The location and type of replacement rights-of-way for the relocation of Conflicting Facilities as part of a Rearrangement shall be mutually agreed by the Parties during the Design Phase. When reasonably possible and where the City Facilities being replaced are located in a public right-of-way, a Rearrangement of those City Facilities shall be lo cated in existing public rights-of-way. If it is not possible for a Rearrangement of a City Facility to be located in a Public Rights-of-Way: (i) the required rights-of-way for the relocation of Conflicting Fac ilities shall be acquired by LACMTA or the City (as mutually agreed) at LACMTA's cost in accor dance with the Project Schedule; and (ii) If LACMTA acquires the rights-of-way, LACMTA shall prov ide the City with an easement, in a form reasonably acceptable to the City, to operate, maintain, and/ or remove such City Facility. Upon acceptance of the applicable Replacement Facility, the City shall convey or relinqu ish to LACMTA or its designee, if permitted by Applicable Law and agreement, at no cost, any City real property interests not part of the Public Rights-of-Way being taken out of service by the Rearrangement, and for which replacement real property interests are provided in accordance with this Section 4.3(b). LACMTA reserves the right to convey replacement rights-of-way in fee to the City. (c) Subject to Section 4.3(b), in the case of any Rearrangements, the Parties acknowledge that LACMTA is responsible for the acquisition of any private rights-of-way necessary to construct and/or operate the NoHo to Pasadena Project on the Proj ect Right-of-Way and LACMTA (or the LACMTA Contractors) shall be responsible for the acqui sition of any temporary construction easements necessary for the Construction of the NoHo to Pasadena Project. Upon reasonable request by LACMTA, the City shall provide reasonable assi stance as may be required for LACMTA to obtain rights-of-way necessary to construct the City Port ion including considering reasonable requests by LACMTA to convey to LACMTA, at no cost to LACMTA, any City-owned temporary construction easements that may be required for Construction of the NoHo to Pasadena Project without requiring LACMTA to go through the appraisal, negotiations, offer, closing and transfer process. Following any such reasonable request, LACMTA will prepare or cause to be prepared, the title documents and documents of conveyance and shall transmit such documents to the City R epresentative who shall process them through the required departments for execution and return them to LACMTA within 90 days after receipt, but in any event in accordance with the Project Schedule. (d) The City agrees and acknowledges that this Agreem ent satisfies any LACMTA obligations to the City and otherwise relating to the certification of rights-of-way as may be required by the California Public Utilities Commission or any other regulatory authority, and that the City shall cooperate with LACMTA, and assist LACMTA, with any right-of-way certification processes involving other entities or agencies such as the California Public Utilities Commission or any other regulatory authority.

4.4 Hazardous Materials
LACMTA (or its LACMTA Contractors) will be respons ible for any environmental site assessments and any remediation of hazardous materials to be performed on the Project Site for the purposes of the NoHo to Pasadena Project. LACMTA will not be responsible for any costs relating to the presence or existence of any environmental hazard on, in, under or about any City Facility, including but not limited to, any "hazardous substance" as that term is defined under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq.), unless LACMTA or any LACMTA Contractor caused the environmental hazard through its actions or remediation of hazardous materials is required to be performed on the Project Site for the purposes of the NoHo to Pasadena Project in accordance with the environmental site assessments.

4.5 Inspection and Acceptance
The Parties agree that inspection and acceptance of the Construction of Rearrangements performed under this Agreement will be carried out in accordance with the procedure set out in EXHIBIT 9 ( Inspection and Acceptance Procedure).
179 of 745

13 ARTICLE 5. BETTERMENTS

5.1 Notice of Betterments
(a) The City shall inform LACMTA what Betterments, if any, the City requests be implemented as a Rearrangement or a part of a Rearrangement by submitting a completed City Betterment Request for LACMTA's review and approval. The City shall su bmit any City Betterment Request to LACMTA promptly after identifying a potential Betterment and in any event shall, unless later delivery is otherwise agreed by LACMTA or acknowledged under this Article 5, deliver all City Betterment Requests to LACMTA prior to the establishment of the Basis of Design. (b) Any Design furnished by the City under a Work Order shall specifically identify any Betterments included in such Design and where Betterments are identified that were not previously agreed under this Article 5, any such Design shall be acco mpanied by a completed City Betterment Request and submitted for LACMTA's review and approval in accordance with this Article 5Article 5. (c) If a City comment to a LACMTA Submittal or any other form of City request with respect to the NoHo to Pasadena Project constitute s a Betterment, LACMTA will deliver a LACMTA Notice of Potential Betterment to the City and within 10 days of deliver y of that Notice, the City will: (i) withdraw the relevant comment; (ii) submit a request for the applicable Betterment by submitting a completed City Betterment Request for LACMTA's review and approval ; or (iii) dispute the basis of the LACMTA Notice of Potential Betterment by referring the matter to the issue resolution ladder set out in EXHIBIT 4 (Roles and Responsibilities ). If the City fails to respond wit hin 10 days of a Notice delivered by LACMTA under this Section 5.1(c), LACMTA may refer the matter to the issue resolution ladder set out in EXHIBIT 4 (Roles and Responsibilities).

5.2 Approval of Betterments
If LACMTA approves a Betterment (with or without changes negotiated and agreed by LACMTA and the City):
(a) the LACMTA Representative s hall counter-sign the City Betterment Request (updated to include any changes negotiated and agreed by LACMTA and the City); and (b) the City will be responsible for the cost of the Betterment.

5.3 Right to Refuse a Betterment
No Betterment shall be constructed that is not approved by LACMTA pursuant to this Article 5Article 5 .

LACMTA shall have the right to refuse and withhold approval for any Betterment, that:
(a) is incompatible with the NoHo to Pasadena Project;
(b) cannot be performed within the constraints of Applicable Law, any applicable Governmental Approvals, and/or the Project Schedule; or
(c) is requested after the establis hment of the Basis of Design ( unless based on conditions unknown after the establishment of the Basis of Design).

5.4 Cost of Betterments
LACMTA shall not be responsible for the cost of any Betterment (whether or not the cost exceeds any estimates provided by LACMTA and including the cost of any additional mitigation measures included as a result of the Betterment if a supplemental enviro nmental approval is required to accommodate that Betterment). Such cost will be paid to LACMTA or credited to LACMTA in accordance with Section 7.2 (Reimbursement and Credits to LACMTA).
180 of 745

14 ARTICLE 6. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

6.1 LACMTA and the City shall commence discussions regard ing the Parties' respective obligations regarding the operation and maintenance of the NoHo to Pa sadena Project during the 60% Design Phase and shall use good faith efforts to agree on an amendment or supplement to this Agreement or to agree a new cooperative agreement to address the Parties respecti ve obligations during the operation and maintenance of the NoHo to Pasadena Project and the procedures and cost reimbursement principles that shall apply to the coordination and performance of their respective obligations during the operation and maintenance of the NoHo to Pasadena Project by the Final Design.

6.2 The Parties agree that any amendm ent or supplement to this Agreement or any new agreement entered into in accordance with Section 6.1 shall be on terms that are substantially consistent with:
(a) the provisions set out in this Agreement (to the ext ent applicable and subject to any necessary amendments to reflect the different phase of the NoHo to Pasadena Project); and (b) the agreed operation and maintenance principles set out in EXHIBIT 10 ( Operation and Maintenance Principles).

6.3 Any amendment, or supplement or new agreement agr eed by the Parties in accordance with Section 6.2 shall be finalized and documented in accordance with Section 10.7 (Amendments).

ARTICLE 7. REIMBURSEMENT AND CREDITS

7.1 Reimbursements to the City
(a) Except with respect to Betterments, LACMTA will reim burse the City for Costs incurred by the City or the City Contractors under a Work Order in accord ance with this Section 7. 1 and the provisions of the applicable Work Order.
(b) If a Rearrangement performed under a Work Order is limited to the removal or elimination of a City Facility because the City has dete rmined the City Facility does not n eed to be relocated, LACMTA will only be responsible for any Costs incurred in Abandoning such City Facility in accordance with the City Standards and will not be required to replace or compensate the City for the replacement of that City Facility.
(c) The City shall use the following procedures for s ubmission of its billings to LACMTA, on a progress basis, for work performed by the City under a Work Order:
(i) the City shall submit the first invoice within no more than 60 days, following the commencement of work under the first Work Order and shall commence quarterly billing thereafter;
(ii) the City shall provide supporting documents to demonstrate the Costs incurred by the City with respect to a Work Order, including City Cont ractor invoices, the names of individuals performing the relevant tasks and the time committed to those tasks, a description of the tasks performed by reference to the tasks described in the Work Order, and any other supporting information required under the terms of the Work Order or otherwise requested by LACMTA; (iii) each billing statement shall: (A) be noted as either "progress" or "final"; (B) be addressed to the LACMTA Representative; (C) include a certification that the Costs identified in such billing were appropriate and necessary to the perform ance of the work under the Work Order and have not previously been billed or paid; and (D) reflect any applicable credits due to LACMTA under this Article 7;
(iv) the final billing under a Work Order, with a notat ion that all work covered by that Work Order has been performed, shall be submitted to LA CMTA within 60 days after completion of the 181 of 745

15 work under the applicable Work Order, and s hall summarize prior progress billings, show inclusive dates upon which work was performed, and include a certificat ion that the Costs identified in such billing were appropriate and necessary to the performance of the work under the Work Order and have not previously been billed or paid; and (v) after the expiration of the 60 day period descr ibed in Section 7.1(c)(iv), LACMTA may notify the City in writing that the 60 day closing billing period has expired, and upon the City's receipt of such Notice from LACMTA, the City shall have 60 days to submit its final invoice. (d) On completion of the Construction of the City Port ion, LACMTA will issue a Notice of closeout to the City (including Final Acceptance of all Rearrang ements for that City Portion). Within 120 days of receiving such Notice, the City must issue invoices to LACMTA for all services under a Work Order for the Design and Construction of the NoHo to Pasadena Project.

7.2 Reimbursements and Credits to LACMTA
(a) LACMTA shall receive a credit, or payment for:
(i) salvage for items recovered from existing City Facilities that the City intends to re-use in the performance of Construction work performed under the provisions of th is Agreement where the amount of salvage credit or payment, if any, shall equal t he depreciated value of like or similar materials as determined by agreement of the Parties, plus reasonable storage and transportation costs of such materials salvaged for the City's use. The sum of credits and/or payments due to LACMTA for salvage shall be agreed by the Parties based on applicable books, records, documents and other data, and in addition, LACMTA and the City may conduct an inspection survey of a City Fac ility prior to or during Design Development.

LACMTA may request and authorize the City to perform support services with respect to any such inspection survey pursuant to the procedures set out under Section 2.3 (Work Orders); (ii) all Costs relating to Betterments upon acceptance of physical work where:
(A) the initial amount of the Betterment payment or cr edit shall be based upon the estimated Cost for the Design and Cons truction of the Rearrangement with the Betterment less the estimated Cost for Desi gn and Construction of the Rearrangement without the Betterment, in each case as set out by LACMTA in its response and approval to the applicable City Betterment Request; and (B) upon acceptance of the physical work for the Betterment, the initial Betterment payment or credit shall be reconciled by t he Parties against the actual Costs of the Betterment; and
(iii) the Expired Service Life Value of each Confli cting Facility being replaced if the Replacement Facility will have an expected period of useful service greater than the period that the existing Conflicting Facility would have had, had it re mained in service and the Rearrangement not been made, where:
(A) the "Expired Service Life Value" shall be an amount determined by the Parties during Design Development based upon estimates provided by the City of the depreciated value of the Conflicting Facility (calculated by multiplying the cost of the Replacement Facility by a fraction, the numerator of which is the age of the Conflicting Facility and the denominator of which is th e estimated overall service life of the Conflicting Facility); and
(B) the Expired Service Life Value shall be determined by the Parties in accordance with Section 7.2(a)(iii)(A) prior to the comme ncement of the applicable Rearrangement work and documented in the applicable Work Order,
182 of 745

16 provided that LACMTA shall not receive a credi t or payment for Expired Service Life Value for street pavement, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, traffic signals, traffic control devices, streetlights, sewers, storm drai n facilities, and any other City- owned Utilities completed as part of the NoHo to Pasadena Project and in accordance with City Standards. Any pavement work performed as part of a Betterment will be subject to Article 5 (Betterments). (b) LACMTA shall receive:
(i) a credit (reflected on the applicable invoice(s) submitted by the City) for salvage, Betterments, and Expired Service Life Value of the City Facilities against work performed by the City, where the City performs the work under a Work Order; and
(ii) payment from the City for sa lvage, costs of Betterments, and Expired Service Life Value of the City Facilities where LACMTA performs the work invoiced and paid in accordance with this Article 7.
(c) Where LACMTA is due a payment under this Article 7:
(i) LACMTA shall commence its monthly billing within no more than 60 days, following the commencement of the applicable work and shall bill monthly thereafter following LACMTA's standard billing procedures;
(ii) LACMTA shall provide supporting document s to demonstrate the costs incurred by LACMTA, including LACMTA Contractor invoices, and (w here applicable) the names of individuals performing the relevant tasks and the time committed to those tasks, a description of the tasks performed, and any other supporting information requested by the City; (iii) each billing statement for a salvage, Betterm ent, or Expired Service Life Value with respect to a City Facility shall: (A) be noted as either "progress" or "final"; (B) be addressed to the City Representative; and (C) incl ude a certification that the Co sts identified in such billing were appropriate and necessary to the perfo rmance of the applicable work and have not previously been billed or paid;
(iv) the final billing for a salvage, Betterment, or Expired Service Life Value with respect to a City Facility, with a notation that all applicable payments due to LACMTA for that salvage, Betterment, or Expired Service Life Value, shall be submitted to the City within 60 days after completion of the applicable work, and shall summarize prior progress billings, show inclusive dates upon which work was performed, and include a certification that the costs identified in such billing were calculated in accordance wit h this Article 7 and have not previously been billed or paid; and
(v) after the expiration of the 60 day peri od described in Section 7.1(c)(iv) ( Reimbursements to the City), the City may notify LACMTA in writing that the 60 day closing billing period has expired, and upon LACMTA's receipt of such Notice from the City, LACMTA shall have 30 days to its submit final invoice.
(v)(vi) The City shall have the right to audit LACMTA’s records related to reimbursable costs.

7.3 Payment of Billings
(a) Payment of each invoice properly submitted pursuant to Section 7.1 (Reimbursements to the City) or

7.2 (Reimbursements and Credits to LACMTA) shall be due within 60 days of receipt; provided that:
(a) all such payments shall be conditional, subject to post-audit adjustments; (b) final payment for a Rearrangement shall be contingent upon final inspecti on (and acceptance) of the work by the Party billed for such work, which inspection (and acceptance, where applicable), will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed; and (c) LACMTA may withho ld payments in the amount of any credit amounts 183 of 745

17 due to LACMTA if the City has not posted such credits within 60 days after submittal of requests for the same by LACMTA.
(b) If LACMTA anticipates payment of an invoice prop erly submitted in accordance with Section 7.1 (Reimbursements to the City) will be delayed longer than 60 days, LACMTA shall notify the City of the delay and provide an anticipat ed payment date. If the City deter mines the anticipated payment date is unacceptable, the City may escalate the issue in accordance with the issue resolution ladder set out in EXHIBIT 4 ( Roles and Responsibilities). If LACTMA fails to remit payment of undisputed amounts within 120 days, the City ma y, upon written notice, suspend performance of reimbursable work until such payment is made, without being deemed in default. (b)(c) The City may offset any undisputed amounts owed by LACTMA against amounts otherwise payable by the City under this Agreement.

ARTICLE 8. INDEMNITY, WARRANTIES AND INSURANCE

8.1 Indemnity
Each Party shall release, defend, indemnify, and ho ld harmless the other Party and its respective officers, agents, contractors, representatives, and employees to the maximum extent allowed by law from and against all liabilities, expenses (including legal fees and costs), claims, losses, suits, and actions of any kind, and for damag es of any nature, including but not limited to, bodily injury, death, personal injury, or property damage arising from or connected with its performance, or the performance of any of its officers, agents, contractors, representatives, and employees, of any of the obligations, work, authority, presence, or jurisdiction allocated or delegated to it under this Agreement (including, in the case of LACM TA, the performance of the Design and Construction of the NoHo to Pasadena Project).
(a) In contemplation of the provis ions of Section 895.2 of the California Government Code imposing certain tort liability jointly upon public entities sole ly by reason of such entities being parties to an agreement as defined by Section 895 of the Government Code, the Parties, as between themselves, pursuant to Sections 895.4 and 895.6 of the Government Code, each assume the full liability imposed on them, or any of their officers, agents or empl oyees, by law for injury caused by negligent or wrongful act or omission occurring in the performance of this Agreement to the same extent that such Party would be responsible under Section 08.1(a). The provisions of California Civil Code Section 2778 are made a part of this Agreement as if fully set out in this Agreement. The Parties intend that liability be allocated in proportion to fault, and no Party shall be responsible for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of the other Party.
(b) Each Party agrees to notify the other promptly upon receipt of any third-party claim for which a Party is entitled to indemnity under this Agreement.

8.2 Warranty
(a) Solely with respect to Rearrangements performed by LACMTA or the LACMTA Contractors and any work performed by the City or the City Contractors, the City and LACMTA each warrant to the other for a period of one year from and after Substantial Co mpletion of that Rearrangement or work (or at such earlier date on which responsibility for the maintenance, loss or damage for that Rearrangement or work passes to the other Party) that such Rearrangement or work performed by them shall be free from defect, provided that in the case of any Punch List items recorded at Substantial Completion (or such earlier date on which the Parties agree responsibility for maintenance, loss or damage passes), the warranty period shall be for one year from and after completion of that Punch List item. The limited warranty given under this Section 8.2(a) is the sole warranty given by the City and/or LACMTA, and, pursuant to this warranty, and for the warranty period only, the City or LACMTA, as the case may be, shall remedy any such discovered defect at its sole expense. This warranty is intended to supplement, and not limit, any other rights or remedies available under this Agreement or applicable law, including those arising from defective or nonconforming work.
184 of 745

18 (b) In connection with Rearrangements performed by LACMTA or the LACMTA Contractors and any work performed by the City or the City Contractors, warranties supplied by the LACMTA Contractors and City Contractors to LACMTA or the City (as applicable) shall be made for the benefit of both LACMTA and the City.
(c) If the City discovers a defect or fa ilure of structural support for a Cit y Facility that results from work performed by LACMTA or an LACMTA Contractor after the expiration of the warranty periods set out in this Section 8.2, LACMTA will, in good faith and as promptly as reason ably possible, engage the City to find and implement an equitable remedy to address the subject defect or failure.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, this obligation shal l not be construed to limit LACMTA’s liability for latent, defects, defective workmans hip, or negligence, nor shall it limit any statutor y or equitable remedies available to the City.

8.3 Insurance
(a) The Parties must ensure that any contract entered into in connec tion with performance of the work under this Agreement contains:
(i) a provision requiring the general contractor, as part of the liability insurance requirements, to provide an endorsement to each policy of gen eral liability insurance naming the City and LACMTA as additional insureds including co verage for completed operations until the expiration of a minimum of seven (7) years after Final Completion or such longer period as coverage is maintained and explicitly waiving subrogat ion rights against LACMTA and the City. Coverage afforded to additional insureds must be at least as broad as coverage afforded to the general contractor/ named insured. If the general contractor/ named insured maintains higher policy limits of coverage than the limits specified herein, or has broader coverage, or has both, then the insurer shall make available the higher limits and broader coverage to such additional insureds. The additional insured coverage shall be primary and non-contributory to any of the City’s general liability insurance policies; (ii) unless otherwise mutually agreed by the Partie s, the requirement for: (A) construction general contractors to provide evidence of insurance in the following amounts: $5,000,000 in general liability per occurrence; $1,000,000 in workers' compensation/employer's liability per accident; and $5,000,000 in combined single limit (CSL) in auto liability per accident; and (B) design contractors to provide evidence of insurance in the following amounts: $5,000,000 in general liability per occurrence; $1,000,000 in workers' compensation/employer's liability; $1,000,000 (CSL) in auto liability; and $2,000,000 in professional liability. Professional liability insurance shall be written on a claims-made basis and shall include a retroactive date prior to the commencement of work under this Agreement. Such insurance shall be maintained for a period of not less than three (3) years following co mpletion of the services, or such longer period as commercially available. If such coverage is cancelled or non-renewed during this period, the contractor shall obtain extended reporting period coverage for the same duration.

Upon request, the contractor shall provi de information regardin g claims reporting requirements under such policy. If the general contractor maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, then LACMTA shall require and LACMTA and the City shall be entitled to the broader coverage an d/or the higher limits maintained by the general contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to LACMTA and the City; (iii) the general contractor’s co mmercial general liability policy shall not contain an exclusion or restriction of coverage claims by one insured aga inst another insured, if the exclusion or restriction is based solely on the fact that the claimant is an in sured, and there would otherwise be coverage for the claim;
(iv) endorsements shall contain the following provision:
185 of 745

19 (A) LACMTA and the City, its officers, offi cials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the commercial general liability policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on be half of the general contractor including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations and automobiles owned, leased, hired, or borrowed by or on behalf of the general contractor. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the general contractor’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10, CG 11 85 or both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 forms if later revisions used); and
(v) for any claims related to this project, t he general contractor’s insurance coverage shall be primary and non-contributory insurance cove rage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 with respect to LACMTA and the City, its office rs, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the LA CMTA, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the general contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. This requirement shall also apply to any excess or umbrella liability policies. (b) Each Party must:
(i) give the other Party 30 days' Notice prior to any reduction in scope or cancellation or expiration of any insurance procured by it under this Section 8.3; (ii) give the other Party 30 days' Notice prior to it agreeing to a reduction in scope or the cancellation or expiration of any insurance pr ocured by a LACMTA Contractor or City Contractor (as applicable) under this Section 8.3; and
(iii) notify the other Party within five days if it receives a Notice from a LACMTA Contractor or City Contractor (as applicable) of the expiration of any insurance procured under this Section 8.3. (c) The insurance requirements set forth in this Section shall not be construed to limit the liability of any party or contractor under this Agreement.

ARTICLE 9. RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES

9.1 Attempt to Resolve
In the event of dispute or difference arising under, out of or in connection with or relating to this Agreement, including any question regarding its ex istence, validity or termination ( "Dispute"), the Parties shall make good faith efforts to resolve the Dispute through negotia tion and the issue resolution ladder under EXHIBIT 4 (Roles and Responsibilities) of this Agreement.

9.2 Arbitration – No Work Stoppage
(a) If the Parties are unable to resolve a Dispute pursuant to Section 9.1 ( Attempt to Resolve ), either Party may serve the other Party a demand for arbitrat ion. Within 22 days (or such longer period as agreed by the Parties) of receipt of such demand, the Parties shall agr ee on a sole arbitrator. If the Parties are unable to agree to the appointment of a sole arbitrator within the 22 days (or any longer period as may be agreed), each Party shall select an arbitrator and those arbitrators shall select a qualified neutral third party to arbi trate with regard to the Dispute (" Neutral Arbitrator") to form a three-person panel. If either Party fails to designa te its arbitrator within 22 days (or longer period as agreed) of delivery of the demand or if the two designated arbitrators are unable to select the Neutral Arbitrator within five days of their appointment, a Neutral Arbitrator shall be designated pursuant to Section 1281.6 of the California Code of Civil Pr ocedure, who shall hear the matter as the sole arbitrator.
(b) The Parties acknowledge that Section 1283.05 of the California Code of Civil Procedure is applicable to those issues not involving work stoppage. A hear ing date shall be set as promptly as possible 186 of 745

20 following selection of the arbitrator in accordanc e with Section 9.2(a). The arbitrator's award shall follow promptly the hearing's conclusion, shall be supported by law and substantial evidence and the issuance of written findings of fact and conclusion s of law. The making of an award that does not comply with such requirements shall be deemed to be in excess of the arbitrator's power and the court shall vacate the award if after review it det ermines that the award cannot be corrected without affecting the merits of the decision upon the controversy submitted.

9.3 Arbitration – Work Stoppage
(a) In the event of a Dispute, neit her Party is permitted to stop work, except: (i) for reasons of public health or safety; or (ii) where work is prevented from continuing pending resolution of the Dispute. In the event that work is stopped, the provisions of this Section 9.3 shall apply. Upon stoppage of work, either Party may serve the other Party a demand for ar bitration. A Neutral Arbitrator who is able to hear the Dispute and render a decisi on within five days after being selected shall be immediately designated pursuant to Section 1281.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. (b) Notwithstanding Sections 1282.2(b) and Section 1282(e) of the California Code of Civil Procedure (regarding postponement of the hearing), where work is stopped, the Neutral Arbitrator may not postpone nor adjourn the hearing except upon the ag reement of the Parties. The arbitration may proceed in the absence of a Party who, after due Notice, fails to appear. In addition to all other issues, the Neutral Arbitrator shall also determine whether it was absolutel y necessary to stop and await resolution of the Dispute in order to continue the work. If it is determined that the work stoppage was not necessary, the Party that did not stop the work shall be entitled to damages (as determined by the Neutral Arbitrator) arising out of such work stoppage. Section 9.2(b) ( Arbitration – No Work Stoppage) shall also apply.

9.4 Impartiality of Arbitrator
Any person who has any material financial or personal in terest in the results of the arbitration shall be prohibited from acting as Neutral Arbitrator. Failure to disclose any such interest or relation shall be grounds for vacating an award handed down under Section 9.2 (Arbitration – No Work Stoppage) or 9.3 (Arbitration – Work Stoppage).

9.5 Compensation of the Arbitrator
Each Party shall pay the expenses and fees of the arbitrator it selects. The expenses and fees of the Neutral Arbitrator shall be paid in accordance with the provisions of Section 1284.2 of t he California Code of Civil Procedure.

9.6 Other Provisions
An arbitrator or panel appointed under this Articl e 9 shall have only the authority to issue a non-binding decision to resolve the dispute of the Parties. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, any arbitration under this Article 9 shall be governed by the California Arbitration Act.

ARTICLE 10. MISCELLANEOUS

10.1 Force Majeure
No Party may bring a claim for a breach of obligations under this Agreement by the other Party or incur any liability to the other Party for any losses or damages incurred by that other Party if a Force Majeure Event occurs and the affected Party is prevented from carryi ng out its obligations by that Force Majeure Event.

During the continuation of any Force Majeure Event, the affected Party shall be excused from performing those of its obligations directly affected by such Force Majeure Event provided that the occurrence or continuation of any Force Majeure Event shall not excuse any Party from performing any payment obligations contemplated under this Agreement. If a Force Ma jeure Event occurs, the Cit y agrees, if requested by LACMTA pursuant to Section 2.3 ( Work Orders), and if deemed possible and feasible by the City (acting 187 of 745

21 reasonably), and subject to LACMTA agreeing to the re imbursement of the cost of the applicable resources and funding in accordance with Section 2.3 ( Work Orders) and Section7.1 ( Reimbursements to the City),to accelerate the performance of its obligations under this Agreement and any Work Order to mitigate any delay arising from the Force Majeure Event provided that LACMTA agrees to reimburse the City for the incremental actual costs of such acceleration.

10.2 Existing Agreements
This Agreement does not negate or otherwise modify any existing easemen ts, licenses or other use and/or occupancy agreements between the City and LACMTA or to which LACMTA has become or does become a successor either by assignment or by operation of law.

10.3 Audit and Inspection; Maintenance of Records
(a) Audit and Inspection . For the period commencing on the Effective Date and ending on the date falling three years after the end of the Term, each Party will have such rights to review and audit the other Party and its books, records and documents as may be deemed necessary for the purposes of verifying compliance with this Agreement, Applicable Law and the City Standards at all times during normal business hours, without charge. Each Part y represents and warrants the completeness and accuracy in all material respects of all information it or its agents provides in connection with any audit by the other Party. If an audit shows that a financial adjustment is required, the Parties will use good faith efforts to agree such adjustment. Examinati on of a document or record during one review and audit shall not preclude further re -examination of such document or record in a subsequent review and audit. The Parties must ensure that any contract entered into in connection with performance of the work under this Agreement contains provisions acknowledging the rights of the City or LACMTA (as applicable) under this Section 10.3(a).
(b) Maintenance of Records. The City shall (and shall endeavor that any City Contractor will) keep and maintain its books, records, and documents related to performance of the work under this Agreement (including all Costs incurred) for three years after the end of the Term; except that, all records that relate to Disputes being processed or actions broug ht under this Agreement must be retained and made available until any later date that such Dis putes and actions are finally resolved. The City reserves the right to assert exemptions from di sclosure of information that would be exempt under Applicable Law from disclosure or introduction into evidence in legal actions.

10.4 Notices
(a) Each Notice under this Agreement must be in writin g and: (i) delivered personally; (ii) sent by certified mail, return receipt requested; (iii) sent by a recognized overnight mail or courier service, with delivery receipt requested; or (iv) sent by email comm unication followed by a hard copy, to the following addresses (or to such other address as may from time to time be specified in writing by such person):

To the City:

City Manager (or designee)
the City of Glendale
___________________
___________________
With a copy to:

City Attorney
the City of Glendale
___________________
___________________
With a copy to:
188 of 745

22 Director of Public Works (and/or the City Engineer)
the City of Glendale
___________________
___________________
To LACMTA:

Chief Program Management Officer
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza, 16th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Facsimile No.: (213) 922-7382
Attn: Eduardo Cervantes or Ferdinand Chan, Third Party Administration With a copy to:

Program Management
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Facsimile No.: (213) 922-7447
Attn: Anthony Defrenza, Project Manager
With a copy to:

County Counsel
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza, 24th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Facsimile No.: (213) 922-7447
Attn: Teddy Low, Senior Deputy County Counsel
With a copy to:

Metro Real Estate
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza, 22nd Floor – Real Estate
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Facsimile No.: (213) 922-7447
Attn: John Potts, Executive Officer
(b) Any Notice sent personally will be deemed deliv ered upon receipt, and any notice sent by mail or courier service will be deemed delivered on the date of receipt or on the date receipt at the appropriate address is refused, as shown on the records of the U.S. Postal Service, c ourier service or other person making the delivery, and any notice sent by email comm unication will be deemed delivered on the date of receipt as shown on the received em ail transmission (provided the hard copy is also delivered pursuant to Section 10.4(a)). All Notices (including by email communication) delivered after 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time will be deemed delivered on the first day following delivery that is not a Saturday, a Sunday, or a federal public holiday.

10.5 Assignment; Successors and Assigns
A Party cannot assign, novate, or otherwise transfer any of its rights or obligations under this Agreement without the prior consent of the ot her Party unless this Agreement expressly provides otherwise. This Agreement is binding upon and will inure to the benef it of LACMTA and the City and their respective successors and permitted assigns.
189 of 745

23 10.6 Waiver
(a) No waiver of any term, covenant, or condition of this Agreement will be valid unless in writing and executed by the obligee Party.
(b) Either Party's waiver of any breach or failure to enforce any of the terms, covenants, conditions, or other provisions of this Agreement at any time will not in any way limit or waive that Party's right to subsequently enforce or compel strict compliance with every term, covenant, condition, or other provision of this Agreement, despite any course of dealing or custom of the trade (other than the waived breach or failure in accordance with the provisions of such waivers).

10.7 Amendments
This Agreement can only be amended or replaced by a written instrument duly executed by the Parties.

10.8 Governing Law and Jurisdiction
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enf orced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. The rights and remedies of LACMTA and the City for default in performance of this Agreement or any Work Order are in addition to any other rights or remedies provided by law.

10.9 Severability
If any provision of this Agreement is ruled invalid by a court having proper jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability will not affect the validity or enforceabi lity of the balance of this Agreement, which will be construed and enforced as if this Agreement did not contain such invalid or unenforceable clause, provision, Article, Section, subsection or part.

10.10 Counterparts
This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

10.11 Limitation on Third Party Beneficiaries
Nothing contained in this Agreement is intended or will be construed as creating or conferring any rights, benefits or remedies upon, or creating any obligations of the Parties toward, any person not a party to this Agreement.

10.12 Survival
The representations, warranties, indemnities, waivers and any express obligations of the Parties following termination, set out in this Agreement shall survive t he expiration or termination, for any reason, of this Agreement.

10.13 Approvals; Further Documents and Actions
Any acceptance, approval, consent, permission, satisfaction, agreement, authorization or any other like action (collectively, "Approval") required or permitted to be given by any Party pursuant to this Agreement or any Work Order:
(a) must be in writing to be effective (except if deemed granted pursuant to this Agreement); (b) shall not be unreasonably with held, conditioned or delayed; and if Approval is withheld, such withholding shall be in writing and shall state with specificity the reasons for withholding such Approval, and every effort shall be made to i dentify with as much det ail as possible the changes that are required for Approval; and
190 of 745

24 (c) shall be deemed granted if no response is prov ided to the Party requesting an Approval within the time period prescribed by this Agreement or the applicable Work Order or if no time is prescribed by this Agreement or the applicable Work Order, within 30 days, in each case commencing upon actual receipt by the Party from which an Approval is requested or required, of a request for Approval from the requesti ng Party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an approval shall not be deemed granted if the approval requires an action by City Council and the City Council has not acted.

The Parties agree to execute such further documents, agreements, instruments and notices, and to take such further actions, as may be reasonably necessary or appr opriate to effectuate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

ARTICLE 11. DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION

11.1 Definitions
Unless the context otherwise requires, capitalized te rms and acronyms used in this Agreement have the meanings given in this Section 11.1.
"Approval" has the meaning given in Section 10.13 (Approvals; Further Documents, and Actions). "Abandon" means the permanent termination of service, or the removal of an existing City Facility or portion of it.
"ADA" means the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. "Adjacent Work" means any removal, demolition, repair, restoration, relocation or reconstruction of existing facilities and/or construction of new facilities and/or other physical works by the City or a third party: (a) that is performed or to be performed within, or within 100 feet of, the Project Site; or the performance of which is otherwise reasonably likely to conflict with the Design and Construction and (b) in the case of works performed or to be performed by a third party, of which the City is aware or should be reasonably aware. "Advanced Conceptual Engineering" means the phase of the Design proc ess that advances the project scope from a conceptual state to a level of schemat ic design that describes the project technical and architectural approach in order to address environmental and community impacts, significant interfaces and operational characteristics to support environmental approvals. The plan percentage complete ranges generally from the initiation of Design (0%) to 15%.
"Agreement" means this agreement and any schedules, exhibits, attachments and annexures to it. "Annual Work Plan" means an annual work plan prepared and agreed by LACMTA and the City in accordance with Section 2.2 (Annual Work Plan).
"Applicable Law" means any statute, law, code, regulation, ordinance, rule, common law, judgment, judicial or administrative order, decree, directive, or other requirement having the force of law or other governmental restriction (including those resulting from the initiative or referendum process) or any similar form of decision of or determination by, or any interpretation or adminis tration of any of the foregoing by, any Governmental Entity which is applicable to the City Portion, Rea rrangements, any work performed (whether performed by the City or LACMTA) under this Agreement or any releva nt person, whether taking effect before or after the date of this Agreement. Applicable Law excludes Governmental Approvals, customs, duties and tariffs. "Basis of Design" means, with respect to any Rearrangements, the scope, criteria, specifications and requirements (including requirem ents of the FEIR) for those Rearra ngements agreed by LACMTA and the 191 of 745

25 City as at the date of issuance by LACMTA of the procurement documents for a construction manager/general contractor for the NoHo to Pasadena Project, as described in Section 1.1(c)(ii) (Scope of Agreement). "Betterment" means work performed in connection with any Rearrangement or as part of a Rearrangement:
(a) comprising an upgrade, change or addition to a City Fa cility (or a part of a City Facility) requested by the City that provides for greater capacity, capability, durability, appearance, efficiency or function or other betterments of that City Facilit y over that which was provided by the City Facility prior to the Rearrangement; or
(b) for which the City Standards applic able to that Rearrangement ar e changed or added to after the establishment of the Basis of Design for that Rearrangement, provided that the term "Betterment" shall exclude:
(i) an upgrade, which the Parties agree, will be of direct and principal primary benefit to the construction, operation and/or maintenance of the NoHo to Pasadena Project, whether or not identified after the Basis of Design or which LACMTA reasonably determines in its sole discretion is necessary in order for the NoHo to Pasadena Project to comply with Applicable Law;
(ii) an upgrade resulting from Design or Cons truction in accordance with the applicable City Standards as set out in EXHIBIT 6 ( Design Requirements) and any changes or additions to those City Standards notified to LACMTA prior to the establishment of the Basis of Design for the Rearrangement and that have not been adopted by the City in breach of Section 3.5(a) (City Standards);
(iii) measures to mitigate environmental impacts identified in the NoHo to Pasadena Project's Final Environmental Impact Report and any supplemental environmental reports for the NoHo to Pasadena Project;
(iv) replacement of devices or materials no longe r regularly manufactured with the next highest grade or size; and
(v) an upgrade that is the consequence of changes made by LACMTA or a LACMTA Contractor after the establishment of the Basis of Design or otherwise resulting from LACMTA-directed changes to the design, scope, or construction methods.
(vi) an upgrade, change, replacement, or addition to a City Facility resulting from subsurface, concealed, or other physical conditions, or ot her material circumstances, that were not reasonably identifiable prior to the estab lishment of the Basis of Design for that Rearrangement; and
(v)(vii) an upgrade, change, replacement, or addition to a City Facility that is necessitated directly by the NoHo to Pasadena Project and is required to comply with Applicable Law, or is reasonably necessary to address a condition created by the Project that materially affects public health, safety, or welfare.
"City" is defined in the Preamble. "City" shall also refer to any City owned or operated "water" and/or "power" departments.
"City Betterment Request" means a Notice from the City to LACMTA requesting a Betterment in accordance with Article 5 (Betterments) and in the form set out in Part B of EXHIBIT 11 (Forms). "City Construction Work" means any Construction work and activities performed or to be performed by the City or a City Contractor pursuant to a Work Order.
192 of 745

26 "City Contractor " means any contractor, consultant, tradesper son, supplier or other person engaged or authorized by the City to perform any Adjacent Work, City Design Work, City Construction Work or any other work to be performed by the City under the provisions of this Agreement or otherwise on or about the Project Site but excluding LACMTA and the LACMTA Contractors.
"City Design Work" means any Design work and activities perfo rmed or to be performed by the City or a City Contractor pursuant to a Work Order.
"City Facility" means real or personal property located within or near the City Portion, such as structures, improvements, and other properties, which are under the ownership or operating jurisdiction of the City, and shall include, but not be limited to, pu blic streets (any classification), highways, bridges, retaining walls, pedestrian/utility tunnels, alleys, storm drains, sanitary sewers, survey monuments, parking lots, parks, public landscaping and trees, traffic control devices, li ghting and communications equipm ent (cameras, sensors, LTE, microwave receivers, etc.) and public buildings, police and fire department related improvements, as well as any dams or water storage tanks, system s, and appurtenances. City-owned airport and harbor facilities are not included in this definition.
"City Maintenance Work" means any maintenance work and activities performed or to be performed by the City or a City Contractor pursuant to a Work Order or under the provisions of this Agreement. "City Municipal Code" means the Glendale Municipal Code. "City Portion" means that portion of the NoHo to Pasadena Project that will pass in, on, under, over or along public streets, highways, bridges, parks and other public right-of-way within the City, as shown in Part B of EXHIBIT 3 (Project Site).
"City Representative" is defined in Section 2.1(b) (Governance). "City Standards" means the City's design st andards and ordinances and Cit y-owned Utility rules and regulations which govern the design of all Rearrangements, as specified in EXHIBIT 6 (Design Requirements) or adopted by the City and notified to LACM TA in accordance with Section 3.5 ( City Standards ) of this Agreement.
"Compliance Comment" means a comment on, objection to or the withholding of approval to a LACMTA Submittal on the basis of one or more of the following:
(a) the LACMTA Submittal or Design work or Cons truction work that is the subject of the LACMTA Submittal fails to comply with (or is reasonably lik ely to fail to comply if implemented in accordance with the LACMTA Submittal) any applicable coven ant, condition, requirement, term or provision of this Agreement; or
(b) LACMTA (or the relevant LACMTA Contractor (as applicable)) has not provided all content or information required with respect to the LACMTA Submittal. "Conflicting Facility" means an existing City Facility, which the Parties determine requires Rearrangement in order to construct, operate or maintain the NoHo to Pasadena Project. "Construction" means all construction activities related to t he City Portion that are necessary to complete and operate and maintain the NoHo to Pasadena Projec t including the removal, demolition, replacement, restoration, alteration or realignment of existing faci lities and the procurement, installation, inspection, and testing of new facilities including temporary and permanent materials, equipment, systems, software, and any components of such permanent materials, systems and software. "Construction Phase" means the phase of the NoHo to Pasa dena Project identified as such in EXHIBIT 2 (Project Phases and Project Schedule).
"Construction Staging Plan" has the meaning given in EXHIBIT 8 (Construction Requirements). 193 of 745

27 "Cost" means all eligible direct and indirect costs act ually incurred for activities or work performed or materials acquired in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, less (in respect of the City) credits to LACMTA as provided in Article 7 (Reimbursement and Credits) where:
(a) eligible direct costs include allowable dire ct labor costs, materials costs, and storage and transportation costs of materials salvaged for the City's use in performing the applicable work; (b) eligible indirect costs shall be computed based upon the indirect cost rates approved annually for the City by its cognizant agency, and as noted on the Form 60, for allocation to federally funded or state funded contracts; and
(c) unless the Internal Revenue Service and the CPUC issue regulations or rulings to the contrary, the eligible direct and indirect costs shall not include taxes purportedly arising or resulting from LACMTA's payments to the City under this Agreement.
"days" means, unless otherwise stated and whether or not capitalized, calendar days. "Design" means all activities related to the design, redesign, engineering or architecture of any Construction work.
"Design Development" means the phase of the Design process th at occurs after Advanced Conceptual Engineering and that develops, on a progressive basis, a clear indication of the design solutions for the applicable requirements and the majo r features of the arch itectural and structural design and third-party interfaces that are intended to form the basis for the Final Design. "Design Documentation" means all drawings (including plans, prof iles, cross-sections, notes, elevations, typical sections, details and diagrams), specifications, reports, studies, calculations, electronic files, records and submittals necessary for, or related to, the design of the Rearrangements. "Design Phase" means the phase of the NoHo to Pasadena Project identified as such in EXHIBIT 2 (Project Phases and Project Schedule).
"Dispute" is defined in Article 9 (Resolution of Disputes). "Effective Date" means the date stated as such on the first page of this Agreement, which shall be the date when this Agreement has been fully executed on behalf of the City and LACMTA. "Engineer of Record" means the individual, firm or entity that performs the Design, that imprints the engineer's/architect's seal on the drawings, and is responsible and liable for the Final Design. "Expired Service Life Value" is defined in Section 7.2(a)(iii)(A) (Reimbursements and Credits to LACMTA). "Final Acceptance" has the meaning given in EXHIBIT 9 (Inspection and Acceptance Procedure). "Final Design" means the phase of the Design process which provides the detailed design for all temporary and permanent project facilities and addresses and resolves all Design review Compliance Comments and finalizes all engineering, architectural and system s designs necessary for Construction. It ends with an approved-for-construction plan status and with the De sign being signed and sealed by the 'Engineer of Record'.
"Final Environmental Impact Report" or "FEIR" means the final environmental impact report for the NoHo to Pasadena Project completed pursuant to the Califo rnia Environmental Quality Act and certified by the LACMTA Board of Directors on April 28, 2022.
"Force Majeure Event" means the occurrence of any of the following events after the date of this Agreement that directly causes either Party (the "affected Party") to be unable to comply with all or a material part of its obligations under this Agreement:
194 of 745

28 (a) war, civil war, invasion, violent act of fore ign enemy or armed conflict or any act of terrorism; (b) nuclear, chemical or biological contamination un less the source or cause of the contamination is brought to or near the Project Site by affected Pa rty unless or is required to be remediated for the purposes of the NoHo to Pasadena Project in accordance with the environmental site assessments; (c) ionizing radiation unless the source or cause of the ionizing radiation is brought to or near the Project Site by the affected Party;
(d) any fire, explosion, severe weather, flood, landslides, soil subsidence caused by severe/unusually adverse weather or earthquakes;
(e) any named windstorm and ensuing storm surges, includ ing the direct action of wind originating from a named windstorm;
(f) any riot or civil commotion;
(g) any blockade or embargo;
(h) epidemic, pandemic, or quarantine; or related health or ders resulting in labor shortage or supply chain delays; or
(i) any official or unofficial strike, lockout, go-slow or other dispute, generally affecting the construction industry or a significant sector of it,
except, in each case, to the extent attributable to any breach of this Agreement or Applicable Law by, or any negligent act or negligent omission of, the affected Party. "Form 60" means Form 60 (Professional Services Cost/Price Summary) in the form attached as Part A of EXHIBIT 11 (Forms).
"Governmental Approval" means any approval, authorization, ce rtification, cons ent, license, permit, registration or ruling, issued by any Governmental Entity required to carry out the Rearrangements, the City Portion or any other work to be performed under the provisions of this Agreement. "Governmental Entity" means any federal, state, or local governm ent and any political subdivision or any governmental, quasi-governmental, judicial, public or statutory instrumentality, administrative agency, authority, body or entity (i ncluding the California Department of Transportation, CPUC and United States Army Corps of Engineers) other than LACMTA and the City. "LACMTA" is defined in the Preamble.
"LACMTA Contract" means any contract, subcontract or other form of agreement between LACMTA and a LACMTA Contractor or between a LACMTA Contractor and its lower tier subcontractor. "LACMTA Contractor" means any contractor, consultant, tr adesperson, supplier, private developer, employee, member of staff, enginee r, architect, agent, operator, or other person engaged or authorized by LACMTA to carry out works with respect to the City Portion, any Rearrangement or otherwise contemplated under the provisions of this Agreement and any other person with whom any LACMTA Contractor has further subcontracted part of such works.
"LACMTA Fiscal Year" means each one-year period commencing on July 1 of a calendar year and terminating on June 30 of the following calendar year.
"LACMTA Notice of Potential Betterment" means a Notice from LACMTA to the City notifying the City of a potential Betterment in accordance with Article 5 (Betterments) and in the form set out in Part C of EXHIBIT 11 (Forms).
195 of 745

29 "LACMTA Representative" is defined in Section 2.1(b) (Governance). "LACMTA Submittal Review Period" means, for each LACMTA Submittal, a period of 30 days from the date of delivery of the LACM TA Submittal to the City under the provisions of this Agreement or such other period as the Parties may agree under the applicable Work Order. "LACMTA Submittals" means:
(a) Design Documentation for a Rearrangement (o ther than any Design Documentation for which the City is responsible under a Work Order);
(b) Construction Management Plans for Construction work performed by LACMTA or a LACMTA Contractor within the Public Rights-of-Way; and
(c) any other documents which LACM TA (or the LACMTA Contractors) must submit to the City in accordance with this Agreement.
"Neutral Arbitrator" is defined in Section 9.2(a) (Resolution of Disputes). "NoHo to Pasadena Project" means the design and construction of a new bus rapid transit line known as the North Hollywood to Pasadena Transit Corridor Project, as more fully described in EXHIBIT 1 ( Project Description) and the FEIR.
"Notice" means any communication under this Agreement including any notice, consent, approval, request, and demand.
"Operation and Maintenance Phase" means the phase of the NoHo to Pasadena Project identified as such in EXHIBIT 2 (Project Phases and Project Schedule).
"Package" means each package of Design Documentation submitted by LACMTA or a LACMTA Contractor to the City in accordance with this Agreement.
"Parties" means collectively the City and LACMTA, and each a "Party". "Project Meeting" means any Project Meeting, meeting, working session, over the shoulder review meeting, or other workshop or meeting convened by LACMTA as described in Section 2.1(d) (Governance). "Project Right-of-Way" means the physical limits for the Design and Construction of the NoHo to Pasadena Project, as identified in Part A of EXHIBIT 3 (Project Site), or as notified by LACMTA to the City and compliant with the FEIR and any supplemental environmental re ports for the NoHo to Pasadena Project, during the Design and Construction Phases.
"Project Schedule" means the schedule for the NoHo to Pasadena Project including the City Portion set out in Part B of EXHIBIT 2 (Project Phases and Project Schedule), as may be amended by a notice from LACMTA to the City or otherwise by an amendment to this Agreement. "Project Site" means, collectively, the Project Right-of-Way and each temporary construction easement for the NoHo to Pasadena Project, as identified in Part A of EXHIBIT 3 (Project Site). "Public Rights-of-Way" means the public streets, highways, bridges, parks and other public rights-of-way within the City.
"Punch List" means, with respect to a Rearrangement (or t he applicable part of a Rearrangement), the list of work items which remain to be completed after Substantial Completion as agreed by the Parties and listed in the applicable Statement of Substantial Completion, which shall be limited to minor incidental items of work necessary to correct imperfections which would not prevent the safe use or operation of the Rearrangement (or applicable part of the Rearrangement) in accordance with the requirements under this Agreement. 196 of 745

30 "Rearrangement" means the work of:
(a) removal, replacement, restoration, alteration, reconstruction, support, or relocation of all or a portion of a Conflicting Facility, whether permanent or temporary, whether identified before or after the Basis of Design, which LACMTA determines in its sole discretion is necessary in order for the NoHo to Pasadena Project to comply with Applicable Law or otherwise which LACMTA and the City mutually agree is necessary in order to construct, operate or maintain the NoHo to Pasadena Project; or (b) the installation of new and required City Facilities which LACMTA determines in its sole discretion is necessary in order for the NoHo to Pasadena Pr oject to comply with Applicable Law or otherwise which LACMTA and the City mutually agree is necessary as a result of the impact of the construction of the NoHo to Pasadena Project.
"Replacement Facility" means a facility, which may be constructed or provided under this Agreement as a consequence of the Rearrangement of a Conflicting Facility or a part of it. "Statement of Final Acceptance" has the meaning given in EXHIBIT 9 ( Inspection and Acceptance Procedure).
"Statement of Substantial Completion" has the meaning given in EXHIBIT 9 (Inspection and Acceptance Procedure).
"Substantial Completion" has the meaning given in EXHIBIT 9 (Inspection and Acceptance Procedure). "Substantial Completion Correction List" has the meaning given in EXHIBIT 9 (Inspection and Acceptance Procedure).
"Temporary Facilities" means a facility constructed for the pur pose of ensuring continued service while a City Facility is taken out of full or partial service for permanent Rearrangement and/or any work on a City Facility, which will be removed or restored to its origi nal condition after such Construction activities are completed.
"Term" is defined in Section 1.2 (Duration of Agreement). "Traffic Control and Lighting Work" has the meaning given in EXHIBIT 6 (Design Requirements). "Traffic Management Plan" means a plan that addresses traffic control requirements in construction areas through a worksite traffic control plan and along detour routes through a traffic circulation plan. "Utility" means a privately, publicly, or c ooperatively owned line, facility, or system (including municipal or government lines, facilitie s, and systems) for transmitting or distribut ing communications, cable television, power, electricity, gas, oil, crude products, water, steam , waste, or any other similar item, including any fire or police signal system as well as streetlights associated with any publicly-owned roadways. "Utility Adjustment" means a relocation (temporary or permanent ), abandonment, protection-in-place, removal (of previously abandoned Utilities as we ll as of newly abandoned Utilities), replacement, reinstallation, rearrangements, or modification of existing Utilities necessary to effect a condition equal to the existing Utility facilities and excluding any Betterments. "Utility Conflict" means an existing Utility, which LACMTA determines requires a Utility Adjustment in order to construct, operate or maintain the NoHo to Pasaden a Project in compliance with the FEIR and subject to Section 2.5(a) (Permits), Applicable Law.
"Work Order" means a work request submitted by LACMTA to the City authorizing the performance of any work associated with the NoHo to Pasadena Project and the associated purchase of required materials.

11.2 Interpretation
197 of 745

31 (a) In this Agreement unless otherwise expressly stated:
(i) headings are for convenience only and do not affect interpretation; (ii) a reference to this Agreement or any other agreement, instrument, or document is to this Agreement or such other agreement, instrument, or document as amended or supplemented from time to time;
(iii) a reference to this Agreement or any other agreement includes all exhibits, schedules, forms, appendices, addenda, attachments, or other documents attached to or otherwise expressly incorporated in this Agreement or any such other agreement (as applicable); (iv) subject to Section 11.2(a)(v) ( Interpretation), a reference to an Article, Section, subsection, clause, Exhibit, schedule, form or appendix is to the Article, Section, subsection, clause, Exhibit, schedule, form, or appendix in or attached to this Agreement; (v) a reference in the main body of this Agreem ent, or in an Exhibit, to an Article, Section, subsection, or clause is to the Article, Section, subsection, or clause of the main body of this Agreement, or of that Exhibit (as applicable);
(vi) a reference to a person includes such person's permitted successors and assigns; (vii) a reference to a singular word includes the pl ural and vice versa (as the context may require); (viii) the words "including", "includes" and "include" mean "including, without limitation", "includes, without limitation" and "include, without limitation", respective ly and the word "or" is not exclusive;
(ix) an obligation to do something "promptly" means an obligation to do so as soon as the circumstances permit, avoiding any delay and "shall" when stated is to be considered mandatory; and
(x) in the computation of periods of time from a specified date to a later specified date, the word "from" means "from and including" and the words "to" and "until" mean "to and including". (b) This Agreement is not to be interpreted or cons trued against the interests of a Party merely because that Party proposed this Agreement or some provision of it, or because that Party relies on a provision of this Agreement to protect itself.
198 of 745

32 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the Effective Date.

APPROVED AS TO FORM

DAWYN R HARRISON,
County Counsel
By:_________________________
Teddy Low
Senior Deputy County Counsel
"LACMTA"

THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN
TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, a California county
transportation authority existi ng under the Authority of §§ 130050.2 et seq . of the California Public Utilities Code
By: ____________________________
Name: ____________________________
Its: _______________________________

APPROVED AS TO FORM
_________________________,
City Attorney
By:_________________________
Name: _________________________
City Attorney

ATTEST
By:_______________________
Name: _________________________
City Clerk
"CITY"

CITY OF GLENDALE,
a California municipal corporation
By: _____________________________
Name: _________________________
Its: City Manager (or designee)

199 of 745

33 EXHIBIT 1 – PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The NoHo to Pasadena Project is a new bus rapid transit (BRT) system that will provi de a BRT service connecting several cities and communities between the San Fernando an d San Gabriel Valleys. From west to east, the route traverses the communities of North Hollywood (in the City of Los Angeles), Burbank, Glendale, Eagle Rock (in the City of Los Angeles) and Pasadena. The NoHo to Pasadena Project will operate along a combination of local roadways and freeway sections with various configurations of mixed-flow and dedicated bus lanes depending on location.

The 19-mile BRT corridor serves as a key regional conn ection between the San Fernando and San Gabriel Valleys.

Each community has dense residential populations and many cultural, entertainment, shopping, and employment areas throughout, including the NoHo Arts District, Burbank Medi a District, Glendale Galleria, Americana at Brand, Eagle Rock Plaza, and Old Pasadena to be served by 22 stations included in the Project. The Project will offer a premium transit service connecting to these destinations with an estimated end-to-end travel time of approximately 70 minutes.

This compares with an existing travel time of approximately 2 hours using a combination of existing bus lines such as 180, 92, 155, and 224. Additionally, th e Project will greatly enhance service re liability by separating buses from the fluctuating traffic congestion, resulting in more consistent run times. The Project will also maintain its faster travel times and reliability even as traffic congestion continues to wors en over time. Further, the BRT will also include additional features that will enhance the customer experience. The NoHo to Pasadena Project will provide improved and reliable transit service to meet the mobility needs of residents, employees, and visitors who travel within the corridor. As a result, the Project is anticipated to attract approximately 30,000 daily riders when it opens.

In addition, to advancing the goals of LACMTA's Vision 2028 Strategic Plan, objectives of the NoHo to Pasadena Project include:

1. Advance a premium transit service that is more competitive with auto travel.

2. Improve accessibility for disadvantaged communities.

3. Improve transit access to major activity and employment centers.

4. Enhance connectivity to LACMTA and other regional transit services.

5. Provide improved passenger comfort and convenience.

6. Support community plans and transit-oriented community goal.

200 of 745

34 EXHIBIT 2 – PROJECT PHASES AND PROJECT SCHEDULE
Part A: Phases
As at the date of this Agreement, the phasing and time peri ods for the NoHo to Pasadena Project is anticipated to be as set out in this Part A. The phases described in this Part A may overlap and the time periods are subject to change.

PHASE KEY ACTIVITIES
Planning & Advanced
Conceptual Engineering
Phase
To Q3 2023
Key activities include:
• Preparation of the draft environmental impact report and the FEIR (complete). • Certification of the FEIR (achieved on April 28, 2022). • Preparation of Advanced Conceptual Engineering.

Design Phase
Q2 2023 to Q1 2025
Key activities include:
• Agreement by the Parties of any Design work and/or Construction work to be performed by the City (including any City- Performed Project Work) in accordance with Sections 3.1(b) ( Design Responsibilities ) and 4.1(b) ( Construction Responsibilities) of this Agreement.
• Procurement of the LACMTA Contra ctor to perform the Design work. • Engineering and Design Development by LACMTA and the applicable LACMTA Contractor through to Final Design.
• Design review and support services provided by the City in accordance with this Agreement.
• Procurement of the LACMTA Contractor to perform Design review, preconstruction services, and the Construction work.

Construction Phase
Q4 2024/ Q1 2025 to Q1
2027
Key activities include:
• Construction of the NoHo to Pasadena Project (including any Rearrangements). • Inspection, Substantial Completion, and Final Acceptance.

Operation and
Maintenance Phase
From Q1 2027
Key activities include:
• Operation of passenger service.
• Maintenance of the NoHo to Pasadena Project.
201 of 745

35 Part B: Project Schedule
As at the date of this Agreement, the schedule for the NoHo to Pa sadena Project is anticipated to be as set out in this Part B. However, this schedule is subject to change, with any changes as notified by LACMTA to the City or otherwise incorporated in an amendment of this Agreement. 202 of 745

36 EXHIBIT 3– PROJECT SITE
Part A: NoHo to Pasadena Project Site

Part B: City Portion
The drawing depicting the City Portion will be as notified by LACMTA to t he City or otherwise incorporated in an amendment of this Agreement.

Part C: Physical Limits of the Project Work
Prior to the establishment of the Basis of Design, LACMTA and the City will meet in good faith to define and agree the physical limits of the structur es and elements of the NoHo to Pasadena Projec t Work (including with respect to bus charger masts and bus stops and canopies/shelters) that LACMTA owns and maintains, or will own or maintain.

In agreeing to such physical limits, LACMTA and the City will take into consideration the intended operation and maintenance roles and responsibilities, as described under EXHIBIT 10 (Operation and Maintenance Principles).

203 of 745

37 EXHIBIT 4 – ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Part A: LACMTA Representative and City Representative
The initial designations of the LACMTA Representative and City Representative are as follows:

LACMTA Representative LACMTA Program Management or such other person, or the holder of a specified office or position, specified, from time to time, by LACMTA's Chief Executive
Officer, or his/her designee
City Representative City Manager or his/her designee

Part B: Summary of Key Roles and Responsibilities
Phase LACMTA / LACMTA Contractors City
General Performing all of LACMTA's obligations
under this Agreement and ensuring that the
LACMTA Contractors comply with the
provisions of this Agreement.

Performing all of City's obligations under this
Agreement and ensuring that the City
Contractors comply with the provisions of this
Agreement.

Planning and
Advanced
Conceptual
Engineering
Phase
Managing the planning process and
preparing all environmental documents
including the FEIR.

Preparing Advanced Conceptual
Engineering for the NoHo to Pasadena
Project.

Providing support and assistance to LACMTA in
obtaining Governmental Approvals and in
dealing with other third parties with respect to
the City Portion.

Design Phase Discussing and identifying any Design work and/or Construction work to be performed
by the City (including any City-Performed
Project Work) in accordance with Sections

3.1(b) (Design Responsibilities) and 4.1(b)
(Construction Responsibilities) of this
Agreement.

Preparing the procurement documents and
managing the procurement of the LACMTA
Contractors for the Design work and the
Construction work.

In the case of the LACMTA Contractor
responsible for the Design work:
• defining its design management plan;
and
• preparing and submitting the Design for
the NoHo to Pasadena Project to the
City to the extent required by this
Agreement, up to and including Final
Design stage.

Discussing and identifying any Design work
and/or Construction work to be performed by
the City (including any City-Performed Project
Work) in accordance with Sections 3.1(b)
(Design Responsibilities) and 4.1(b)
(Construction Responsibilities) of this
Agreement.

Continuing to provide support and assistance to
LACMTA in obtaining Governmental Approvals
and in dealing with other third. parties with
respect to the City Portion.

Reviewing and approving Designs submitted to
it in accordance with agreed procedures.

Performing any other Design-related obligations
under any Work Orders.

Providing assistance to LACMTA in procuring
any right-of-way necessary for the City Portion
to the extent set out in this Agreement.
204 of 745

38 Phase LACMTA / LACMTA Contractors City
Monitoring the performance of the LACMTA
Contractors.

Construction
Phase
In the case of the LACMTA Contractor
responsible for the Construction work,
performing the Construction work in
accordance with the Final Designs, the
provisions of its LACMTA Contract and the
provisions of this Agreement.

Monitoring the performance of the LACMTA
Contractors.

Performing its Construction-related obligations
under any Work Orders.

Coordinating Adjacent Work, City Construction
Work and City Maintenance Work.

Operation and
Maintenance
Phase
Operating and maintaining the NoHo to
Pasadena Project, including performing any
operation and maintenance work allocated
to LACMTA under the provisions of this
Agreement (including any amendment or
supplement or new agreement entered into
under Article 6 (Operation and
Maintenance)).

Performing any operation and maintenance
work allocated to the City under the provisions
of this Agreement (including any amendment or
supplement or new agreement entered into
under Article 6 (Operation and Maintenance))
and coordinating maintenance work and
Adjacent Work with LACMTA and any LACMTA
Contractor(s).

Part C: Issue Resolution and Decision-Making
The following City staff or its designees shall be responsible for coordinating among the applicable City departments and divisions as necessary to make the designated decision or approval.

City Team Partial List of Key Functions for Decision or Approval LACMTA Team City Manager,
Director of Public
Works
Spearhead council approvals.

Level 2 decision makers for the purposes of the issue
resolution ladder described below.

LACMTA Deputy Chief
Program Management.

Director of Public
Works, City
Engineer
Approve all final Construction plans and related documents as required by this Agreement.

Provide overall leadership in timely resolution of Design, Construction, plan review, and related administrative
matters.

CA Professional Engineer Registration
Level 1 decision makers for the purposes of the issue
resolution ladder described below.

LACMTA Senior
Executive Officer or
designated LACMTA
Project Manager.

City Public Works
Construction
Department Head or
City designated
Project Manager or
equivalent
designated
representative(s)
Provide Construction support as specified in this Agreement.

Manage assigned resources and coordinate interactions
between the City and LACMTA and the LACMTA
Contractors as it relates to Construction support.

Provide independent quality assurance (IQA) functions.

LACMTA designated
Project Manager
(Executive Officer or
Deputy Executive
Officer) or designated
Construction Manager
(Deputy Executive
205 of 745

39 Officer or Senior
Director).

City Public Works
Permit Division
Head or equivalent
designated
representative(s)
Oversee and coordinate all plan reviews as specified in this Agreement.

Manage and coordinate interaction of the City with LACMTA and the LACMTA Contractors as it relates to Design review and comment resolution.

Provide the necessary coordination in planning,
engineering, technical, analytical and administrative support services with respect to desi gn approval including fire/life safety, police/public security, access, transportation
engineering, civil and structural engineering, street lighting engineering, drainage, sanitation, landscaping, and related maintenance requirements.

Skilled in change management and expedited approvals.

LACMTA Designated
Project Engineer
(Deputy Executive
Officer or Senior Director
levels), consultant
construction manager,
and LACMTA Third
Party Admin Dept
Project Lead (Civil).

City Traffic Engineer
or equivalent
designated
representative(s)
Approve all worksite traffic control plans and any final design documents pertaining to both permanent and temporary
traffic controls (signals, striping, WATCH lane closures, MUTCD restrictions, etc.).

LACMTA designated
Project Engineer
(Deputy Executive
Officer or Senior Director
levels), consultant
construction manager,
LACMTA Third Party
Admin Dept Project Lead
(Civil) and traffic
engineering consultants.

Issues between the Parties that arise with respect to the NoHo to Pasadena Project under this Agreement that cannot be resolved at the working level will be escalated by the Parties for resolution as follows:

1. If the issue is unresolved at the working level for 20 da ys (or such other period as is expressly set out in this Agreement with respect to the relevant issue) commencin g on the date when LACMTA or the City first identifies the issue to the other in a meeting (a s documented in meeting minutes) or in an email notification to the other marked "Issue for Resolution" and describing the issue or difference and the background to it (together with any supporting information), then on the 21st day (or the first day after the applicable period as is expressly set out in this Agreement with respect to the relevant issue):
a. the applicable LACMTA team member described in th e table above will escalate the issue to the LACMTA level 1 decision maker identified in the table above; and b. the applicable City team member descr ibed in the table above will escalate the issue to the City level 1 decision maker identified in the table above,
in each case describing the issue and the background to the issue in a position paper (together with any supporting materials). The level 1 decision maker from LACMTA and the City will then meet within ten days of being notified of the issue to attempt in good faith to resolve the issue.

2. If the level 1 decision makers are unable to resolve the issue within ten days of being notified of the issue:
a. the LACMTA level 1 decision maker will escalate the i ssue to LACMTA's level 2 decision maker identified in the table above; and
b. the City level 1 decision maker will escalate the issue to the City's level 2 decision maker identified in the table above,
206 of 745

40 in each case describing the issue and the background to the issue in a position paper (together with any supporting materials). The level 2 decision makers from LACMTA and the City will then meet within ten days of being notified of the issue to attempt in good faith to resolve the issue.

3. If the level 2 decision makers are unable to resolve t he issue within 20 days of being no tified of the issue, then either Party may refer the issue to the dispute resolution procedures under Article 9 (Resolution of Disputes).

Any meetings of the level 1 or level 2 decision makers may be held in person or via videoconference or teleconference.

Any resolution of an issue agreed by the Parties will be doc umented by the Parties in writing and any amendments to this Agreement agreed by the Parties as part of the reso lution will be documented in accordance with Section 10.7 (Amendments) of this Agreement. To the extent that the LACMTA Representative or City Representative is not also a level 1 or level 2 decision maker, each Party is responsible for ensuring that its representative is notified of any issue escalation and of any resolution reached.

207 of 745

41 EXHIBIT 5 – UTILITY ADJUSTMENT PROCEDURES
LACMTA and the City will perform the following actions and activities with Utilities that conflict with the City Portion:

1. Identification of Utility Conflicts

1.1 The City will coordinate and cooperate with LACMTA in providing any locational data or other information already in its possession regarding the location of Utilities within the City Portion.

1.2 LACMTA will identify Utility Conflicts within the City Portion and deliver a list of the identified Utility Conflicts to the City, including:
(a) City-owned Utilities; and
(b) private Utilities.

The list of identified Utility Conflic ts will include the anticipated Utilit y Adjustment to address each Utility Conflict and a schedule defining when such Utility Adjustments should be completed. The City acknowledges and agrees that identification of Utility Conflicts within t he City Portion will be an it erative process and that LACMTA may deliver more than one list of identified Utility Conflicts for each Project and may update the list of identified Utility Conflicts, during all phases of the NoHo to Pasadena Project.

2. Interface with City-owned Utility Owner

2.1 The Parties agree to cooperate and coordinate on the Re arrangement of City-owned Utilities within the Public Rights-of-Way. The performance of the Design and Construction work for the City-owned Utility Adjustments shall be performed as follows:
(a) electric Utility shall be responsible for the Design of electric Utility Adjustments for City-owned Utilities; (b) fiber Utility shall be responsible for the Design of City-owned fiber Utility Adjustments and LACMTA shall be responsible for the Construction of the City-owned fiber Utility Adjustments; and (c) LACMTA shall perform the Design and Constr uction work for water Utility Adjustments.

2.2 Within 20 days of delivery of a Utility Conflict i dentification list under Section 1.2(a) ( Identification of Utility Conflicts) of this EXHIBIT 5 (or such longer time period as may be agreed to by the Parties), the Parties will meet to:
(a) verify that all City-owned Util ity conflicts have been identified; (b) discuss any additional locational data and other information required regarding the Utility; (c) identify the LACMTA and City points-of -contact for each conflicting Utility; (d) agree on timing for the Utilit y Adjustments, the applicable Cit y Standards and coordination of the schedule for Construction with LACMTA's Project Schedule; and (e) discuss the Design Documentation that the City- owned Utility shall prepare for the 65%, 85% and 100% Designs (including horizontal design, profiles, shoring, and worksite traffic control plans) for the Utility Adjustments to ensure the De sign for the Utility Adjustment does not interfere with, disrupt or delay the Design, Construction, operation or maintenance of the NoHo to Pasadena Project.

2.3 LACMTA shall reimburse the City-ow ned Utility for agreed upon Costs to perform the Utility Adjustments in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. A Form 60 submitted by the City-ow ned Utility for the Utility Adjustments shall estimate the total effort required fo r the City-owned Utility to perform the Design, Design support, other Design-related activities and/or Construc tion work and shall attach the schedule prepared in 208 of 745

42 accordance with this Agreement and agreed by the Parties for the performance of the Design, Design support, other Design-related activities and/or Construction work under a Work Order in accordance with the terms of that Work Order and this Agreement.

3. Interface with Private Utility Owner

3.1 Promptly following delivery of a Utility Conflict identification list und er Section 1.2 ( Identification of Utility Conflicts) of this EXHIBIT 5 (and in the case of Section 3.2(a) below, within 10 da ys of delivery of a Utility Conflict identification list under Section 1.2 (Identification of Utility Conflicts) of this EXHIBIT 5 (or such longer time period as may be agreed by the Parties)), for each Utility Conflict that has been identified, the City will:
(a) review any applicable franchise agreement and identify in a Notice to LACMTA (attaching any applicable franchise agreements and any other supporting documentation) the following terms under any applicable franchise agreement:
(i) the process to have the Utility owner perform the required Utility Adjustment (including any notices to be delivered);
(ii) procedures to obtain further locational data or other information regarding the Utilities; (iii) responsibility for costs for the required Utility Adjustment; (iv) timeframes for the required Utility Adjustment; and (v) constraints or limitations on the City's ability to exercise its franchise rights for the purposes of Utility Adjustments to address a Utility Conflict within the City Portion; and (b) exercise any rights under any applicable franchis e agreement or Applicable Law to obtain locational data and other information regarding the Utilities within the City Portion and shall provide any and all such information received from the Utility owner to LACMTA.

3.2 Within 20 days of delivery of a Utility Conf lict identification list under Section 1.2 ( Identification of Utility Conflicts) of this EXHIBIT 5 (or such longer time perio d as may be agreed to by the Parties), LACMTA and the City will meet to:
(a) review the information provided by the City under Section 3.1 (Interface with Private Utility Owner) of this EXHIBIT 5EXHIBIT 5 and any comments or questions from LACMTA regarding the terms of each applicable franchise agreement;
(b) consider any real property rights held by LACMTA in the City Portion to be raised and addressed with the Utility owner;
(c) identify the LACMTA and City points-of-contact fo r each other and the applicable Utility owners with conflicting Utilities; and
(d) where a Utility Conflict has been identified, discuss and agree timing and approach and roles and responsibilities under this Exhibit including identifying:
(i) whether the City will be requested to exercise franchise rights; and (ii) if the City will not be reques ted to exercise its franchise rights, any other cooperation and coordination activities to be performed by the City in accordance with this Agreement.

3.3 Following each such meeting, LACMTA and the City will document the agreed timing, approach and roles and responsibilities to be taken in accordance with this EXHIBIT 5 in minutes signed by each Party. Following identification of Utility Conflicts within the City Portion under Section 1 (Identification of Utility Conflicts) of this 209 of 745

43 EXHIBIT 5EXHIBIT 5 and agreement of the activities, roles and responsibilities under Section 3.2 (Interface with Private Utility Owner) of this EXHIBIT 5:
(a) for any Utility Conflicts where the Parties have agreed that the City will exercise its rights under the applicable franchise agreement:
(i) within 10 days of receipt of a written request from LACMTA (or such longer time period as may be agreed to by the Parties) the City will exercise its franchise rights under the franchise agreement with the applicable Utility owner by sending written notice to the applicable Utility owner instructing it to relocate or remove th e conflicting Utility or per form any other Utility Adjustment at that Utility owner's expense;
(ii) LACMTA with the suppor t of the City as necessary, will request a meeting with each applicable Utility owner, to be attended by LA CMTA and the City and at each such meeting with an applicable Utility owne r, the attendees will discuss (inclu ding schedule expectations in accordance with the Project Schedule fo r the City Portion and cost reimbursement expectations);
(iii) within the time periods required under the ap plicable franchise agreement or Applicable Law, the City will assist LACMTA in sending any other written notices to the applicable Utility owner, as required under the applicable franchise agreement or Applicable Law in order for the City to exercise its franchise rights or other rights under Applicable Law with respect to the Utility Conflict(s) and required Utility Adjustment(s);
(iv) within the time periods required under the applicable local, state and/or federal government codes, the City will send all such notices as are required to be submitted for each of the processing steps required by local, state, and federal government codes in order for the City to exercise its franchise rights or other rights under Applicable Law with respect to the Utility Conflict(s) and required Utility Adjustment(s) (i ncluding any utility claim letters, record of investigations, draft utility agreements and/or utility certifications); (v) LACMTA, with the support of the City as necessary, will submit any required project plans, Designs, and other relevant documents for t he City Portion prepared by LACMTA to each applicable Utility owner, for that Utility owner's review; (vi) all responses to reviews, comments and othe r correspondence relating to a Utility Conflict or the exercise of franchise or other City rights in accordance with this Exhibit from Utility owners shall be delivered to the City in accordance with the time periods required under the applicable franchise agreement or under Applicable Law or any more stringent schedule agreed with the Utility owner for the NoHo to Pasadena Project, with a copy to LACMTA. If a Utility owner fails to provide a copy to LACMTA, the City agr ees to forward a copy of such responses, comments or other correspondence to LACMTA pr omptly (and in any case within 5 days of receipt);
(vii) LACMTA will address any comments received fr om Utility owners and will submit responses to the Utility owner, with a copy to the City. If LACMTA is not permitted to submit responses directly to the Utility owner u nder the terms of the franchise agreement or otherwise under Applicable Law, the City agrees to transmit LACMTA's response to the Utility owner; (viii) LACMTA with the support of the City as necessary, shall request that each applicable Utility owner prepare 65%, 85% and 100% Designs (incl uding horizontal design, profiles, shoring, and worksite traffic control plans) for the Utilit y Adjustments to be performed by that Utility owner;
(ix) the City shall exercise its rights under the terms of the franchise agreement or otherwise under Applicable Law to coordinate the Desi gn of the Utility Adjustm ent with the Design for the City Portion so that the Design for the Utility Adjustme nt does not interfere with, disrupt 210 of 745

44 or delay the Design, Construction, operation or maintenance of the City Portion, including delivering promptly upon receipt from the Utility owner, copies of all Designs and plans for the Utility Adjustment work to LACMTA and shall give LACMTA the right to review and comment on the Designs (including the final Designs) and plans for the Utility Adjustment work. Any LACMTA comments to or acceptance or approval of a Utility owner's Design under this EXHIBIT 5EXHIBIT 5 will not relieve the relevant Utilit y owner or its contractors from professional liability (errors and omissions) as the Design Engineer of Record for any Utility Adjustment performed by the Utility owner or its contractors; and (x) with respect to Design and Construction work for Utility Adjustments that are to be performed by a Utility owner, LACMTA with the support of the City as necessary (including exercising its rights under the terms of the franchise agreement or otherwise under Applicable Law) shall:
(A) enforce the Utility owner's schedule for Design and Construction in accordance with any timelines set out under the terms of the City franchise agreement, Applicable Law or any more stringent schedule agreed with the Utility owner for the NoHo to Pasadena Project;
(B) assist in coordinating the Utility owner 's schedule for Construction with LACMTA's Project Schedule and shall otherwise re quire that the Utility owner comply with Section 2.6 (Coordination of Work) of this Agreement with respect to the coordination of the Utility Adjustment work;
(C) ensure all costs for that Design and Construction work are incurred solely in conformance with the terms of any applicable franchise agreement or Applicable Law; (D) undertake inspections (including surveys) to ensure that all such Utility Adjustments are constructed in accordance with the approved Designs; (E) invite LACMTA to inspect all such Ut ility Adjustments together with the City; and (F) if requested by LACMTA, the City will undertake subsequent enforcement actions to enforce its franchise rights with respect to a required Utility Adju stment in the event no action is taken by the applicable Utility owner in response to a notice issued by the City under this EXHIBIT 5EXHIBIT 5 provided that Section 2.7 ( Utility Adjustments) of this Agreement will apply with respect to the City's Costs incurred in taking such enforcement actions; and further provided that to the extent that the applicable Utility owner disputes the City's right to exercise its franchise rights or other rights under Applicable Law with respect to a Utility Adjustment for the City Portion and/or commences any actions or legal proceedi ngs with regard to the same, LACMTA's indemnity in favor of the City under Section 8.1 ( Indemnity) of this Agreement will apply. If requested by LACMTA, the City will suspend or withdraw any enforcement or defense of its franchise rights or ri ghts under Applicable Law to require a Utility Adjustment in the City Portion; or
(b) for any other Utility Conflict, the City will cooperate with and a ssist LACMTA in performing the necessary steps to ensure that applicable Utility owners implement the Utility Adjustments necessary to address conflicting Utilities that will impact the City Portion in a timely manner including:
(i) If requested by LACMTA, attending meetings with the Utility owners; (ii) notifying LACMTA of any ot her Utility works requested by the City for City projects unrelated to the City Portion and coordinating any such other Utility adjustments with LACMTA; and (iii) providing LACMTA with all information availa ble to the City regarding Utility Conflicts or potential Utility Conflicts.
211 of 745

45 EXHIBIT 6 – DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

1. GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA
Any Design work for any Rearrangements shall be performed in accordance with:
(a) the Design requirements set out in this EXHIBIT 6 or otherwise under the provisions of this Agreement and the relevant Work Order (if applicable); and
(b) all Governmental Approvals, Applicab le Law and, subject to Section 3.5 ( City Standards ) of this Agreement, the City Standards.

2. CITY STANDARDS
The Parties agree that for the purposes of this Agreement, the "City Standards" will be those City design standards and ordinances, City-owned Utility rules and regulations, notified by the City to LACMTA, or otherwise incorporated in an amendment of this Agreement in accordance with Section 3.5 (City Standards) of this Agreement. The City Standards include, in eac h case subject to and in accordance with Section

3.5(City Standards) of this Agreement:
(a) Complete Streets Objective Design Standards;
(b) Glendale Water and Power Rules and Regulations;
(c) City of Glendale Public Works Standard Plans;
(d) Objective standards codified in the City Municipal Code; (e) Standard Specifications for Public Works Constr uction 2012 Edition (Greenbook), 2012 Edition – (unless otherwise specified by the City) and related Standard Plans; (f) California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devi ces – latest edition (unless otherwise specified by the City); and
(g) Caltrans Standard Plans and Spec ifications (for traffic signal des ign only) - latest edition (unless otherwise specified by the City).

3. SPECIFIC DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR REARRANGEMENTS

3.1 Surface Openings. To the extent operationally and fiscally practical, LACMTA shall locate surface openings, if any to mitigate: (a) the effect on existing features of landscape and improvements; and (b) public disruption; in each case after taking account of health and safety concerns. Placement of gratings in sidewalks will be avoided to the extent reasonably prac ticable; however, all other openings, such as mechanical access openings, shall be regularly permitted in sidewalks, provided such openings are enclosed.

3.2 Landscaping. Trees and landscaped areas under ownership or daily control of the Cit y shall be preserved whenever practical. Trees in the Project Site, which are not being removed by LACMTA, shall be adequately protected. Trees that must be re moved due to Rearrangements shall be replaced by LACMTA, if the City elects and right-of-way is available. All landscapi ng changes shall be coordinat ed with the City's Urban Forestry Section and Community Services and Parks Department. Replacement work shall be in accordance with applicable City Standards and sha ll be coordinated with the City. Landscaped areas removed due to Rearrangements shall be restored to the original condition to the extent practical as agreed to by the City and LACMTA. LACMTA shall prepare the Landscape Replacement Study in accordance with the FEIR Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Recycled water sha ll be used for landscaping to the furthest extent reasonably practicable.
212 of 745

46 3.3 Traffic Control Devices and Lighting Systems. If a Rearrangement requires the removal and reinstallation, or modification of existing or installation of new traffic cont rol devices or lighting systems ("Traffic Control and Lighting Work" ), then LACMTA must obtain the City's appr oval of LACMTA's Design for the Traffic Control and Lighting Work (which consent may not be unreasonably delayed or withheld).

3.4 Private Projections in Public Ways. If LACMTA determines that a privat e projection in, over or under any City Facilities or the Public Rights-of-Way must be removed to accommodate the NoHo to Pasadena Project, LACMTA will issue a Work Order to the City and the City shall take all reasonable actions within its powers to require the elimination of such projections by the time specified in the Work Order. If the City is not empowered to affect the removal of such projections, or if LACMTA otherwise elects, LACMTA will make its own arrangements for removal of such projections. The City will cooperate with LACMTA to minimize the cost to eliminate, move, remove or otherwise terminate projections.

3.5 City Communications Facilities . The relocation of any conflicting underground City communications facilities shall be done by employing intercept-style manholes at both ends of every conflicting communications conduit segment in question, directly on the alignment of existing conduit segment(s), and beyond the area of the conflicting communications facilities.

3.6 Street Paving. If a Rearrangement requires street paving and there is not an applicable City Standard regarding the method of street paving required, the Parties will: (i) evalua te the street conditions, (ii) review the Pavement Conditions Index, and (iii) use s ound engineering judgement and cooperate and coordinate with each other in good faith to mutually agree whether sandblasting, paving, repaving, or street resurfacing will be implemented to complete the Rearrangement in efficient manner. If the Parties are unable to agree on the method to pave the street, the issue will be escalated in accordance with the issue resolution ladder set out in EXHIBIT 4 (Roles and Responsibilities).

4. PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION OF DESIGN DOCUMENTATION
For those Rearrangements where LACMTA is responsible for the Design wo rk under the provisions of this Agreement, LACMTA will, and will ensure that the LACMTA Contractors will:
(a) prepare and submit all Desi gn Documentation to the City:
(i) in Packages in accordance with the schedule under the applicable design management plan defined by LACMTA and/or the ap plicable LACMTA Contractor and notified to the City (as may be updated and notified to the City from time to time); and (ii) in a manner and at a rate which, havi ng regard to the quantum of Design Documentation submitted, will give the Cit y a reasonable opportunity to review the submitted Design Documentation;
(b) ensure that the Design Documentat ion submitted for the Final Design is of a level of detail which is sufficient to permit the City to determine whether the Design Documentation complies with this Agreement and the Construction work which wil l be performed in accordance with the Design Documentation will comply with this Agreement and highlights any material amendments made since any earlier submittal of that Design Documentation;
(c) invite the City to attend any pre-submittal workshops held where Design Documentation for a Rearrangement is to be presented; and
(d) if reasonably requested by the City, make available the appropria te design personnel to participate in design review meetings after submittal of any Design Documentation for a Rearrangement to explain the Design Documentation or a particular element of it and provide such information regarding the Design Documentation as the City may reasonably request.

213 of 745

47 EXHIBIT 7 – LACMTA SUBMITTAL REVIEW PROCEDURE

1. GENERAL

1.1 The Parties agree that individuals undertaking Design review on behalf of the City under this Agreement shall, where reasonably possible, be consistent throughout the Design Phase. The City will ensure that any individual undertaking Design review on behalf of the City under this agree ment has the appropriate qualifications, capability and experience to perform the review.

1.2 The procedures set out in this EXHIBIT 7 will govern all LACMTA Submittals to the City pursuant to this Agreement.

2. REVIEW PROCEDURE

2.1 The City shall notify LACMTA and t he relevant LACMTA Contractor (if applicable) within 10 days of receipt of a LACMTA Submittal from LACMTA or a LACMTA Co ntractor if it considers (acting reasonably based on the preliminary review) that the LACMTA Submittal submi tted is incomplete or deficient for the City's review purposes and requires re-submission, together with a detailed description of the information that it deems to be missing or deficient. If no such Notice is delivered by the City within such t en-day period, the LACMTA Submittal shall be deemed complete and acceptable for review purposes.

2.2 The City shall (or must require that the relevant City Contractor) within the LACMTA Submittal Review Period:
(a) review the LACMTA Submittal; and
(b) notify LACMTA and the relevant LACMTA Contractor (if applicable) that it:
(i) approves the LACMTA Submittal; or
(ii) rejects the LACMTA Submittal with detail ed reasons including all Compliance Comments.

2.3 All Compliance Comments shall be transmitted in the form of a comment matrix, through the LACMTA 'Quality Management Oversight' database or through another e quivalent format (in each case, as notified and provided by LACMTA) and shall be accompanied by an annotated LACMTA Submittal (if applicable). Where a database is used for transmission of comments, LACMTA will provide the City (and the relevant City Contractors) with user accounts and training for this purpose.

2.4 If no comments are received within the LACMTA Submittal Review Period (or such longer time period as may be agreed to by the Parties), the LACMTA Submittal shall be deemed complete and approved by the City.

2.5 The Parties acknowledge that the LACMTA Submittal re view process set out in this EXHIBIT 7 is intended to facilitate the LACMTA Submittal review process a nd be consistent (with necessary changes) with the LACMTA Guidelines on Enhanced Partnered Coordination and shall supersede the submittal / shop drawing review schedules specified in any standards referenced in this Agreement.

3. GROUNDS FOR OBJECTION OR COMMENT

3.1 The City will only be entitled to reje ct a LACMTA Submittal under Article 2 (Review Procedure) of this EXHIBIT 7 if such LACMTA Submittal fails to comply with the r equirements set out in this Agreement, as specified in the City's Compliance Comments.

3.2 If the City rejects a LACMTA Submittal in accordance with Article 2 ( Review Procedure) of this EXHIBIT 7, LACMTA must (or must require that the relevant LACMTA Contractor):
(a) address the Compliance Comments and re-submit the LACMTA Submittal for review; or 214 of 745

48 (b) notify the City that it does not agree with the grounds for rejection. If LACMTA does not agree with the grounds for rejection on the basis that such grounds would constitute a Betterment, Article 5 (Betterments) of this Agreement shall apply.

3.3 The City agrees that during the Final Design stage, it shall not raise any new issues, or make any comments, which are inconsistent with its comments on earlier submittals, or with any changes already agreed to by the City.

3.4 The City may raise new comments at the Final Design stage of a Rearrangement as a consequence of Design changes made by LACMTA or a LACMTA Contractor after the City's review of the most recent prior submittal of Designs for such Rearrangement.

3.5 The City's approval of the Final Design for any Rearrangement will not be withheld if the submittal is consistent with the most recent earlier submittal for such Rear rangement, modified as appropriate to respond to the City's Compliance Comments on such earlier submittal (to the extent such comments were made in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement) and to reflect any subsequent changes agreed to by the City and LACMTA.

4. NO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION WORK
LACMTA and the City must not commence or permit the commencement of any Construction work that is the subject of, governed by or dependent upon a LACMTA Submittal until LACMTA (or a LACMTA Contractor) has submitted the relevant LACMTA Submittal to the City in accordance with this EXHIBIT 7 and:
(a) within ten days of receiving a Notice from LACMTA (or the relevant LACMTA Contractor (as applicable)) that the City failed to respond to a LACMTA Submittal within the relevant LACMTA Submittal Review Period (or any such longer time period agreed to by the Parties), the City fails to respond to such LACMTA Submittal; or
(b) the City has notified LACMTA ( and the relevant LACMTA Contractor (as applicable)) that it approves such LACMTA Submittal.

215 of 745

49 EXHIBIT 8 – CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS

1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
(a) Any Construction work for any Rearrangements or t he City Portion to be performed within the Public Rights-of-Way shall be performed in accordance with:
(i) in the case of any Rearrangements, the approved Final Design (including any changes agreed under Section 3.6 (Changes to Design) of this Agreement); (ii) all Governmental Approvals, Applic able Law and, subject to Section 3.5 ( City Standards) of this Agreement, the City Standards;
(iii) the schedule for such Construction work agre ed under the relevant Work Order (if applicable) or otherwise under the Project Schedule; and
(iv) all other Construction requirements set ou t in this EXHIBIT 8 or otherwise under the provisions of this Agreement and any relevant Work Order (if applicable). (b) In conjunction with its contra ctors, LACMTA will be responsible fo r conducting public outreach to provide proper notifications to the affected communities prior to and during Construction complying with the FEIR. LACMTA will coordi nate its outreach with the City's Public Information Office, as needed. LACMTA will establish a Project hotline fo r the public to communicate questions and concerns.
(c) LACMTA is responsible for ensuring that any LA CMTA Contractors performing Construction work for the Rearrangements, in the P ublic Rights-of-Way, or on City- owned property have obtained all performance and payment bonds required under Applicable Law.

2. WORKING HOURS
Construction hours shall comply with the City Municipal Code and the holiday moratorium shall be observed in accordance with the City Municipal Code. Notwithstanding, the Parties acknowledge that extended working hours may be necessary to facilitate Co nstruction of the City Portion. If a change is required to the working hours, the Parties will discuss in good faith extended working hours following joint review of the schedule and activities to be carried out by LACMTA and the LACMTA Contractors and agree to such change as appropriate.

3. HAUL ROUTES
The Parties will agree haul routes reasonably necessary to facilitate Construction, operation and maintenance of the City Portion. If a change is r equired to an agreed haul route, the Parties will negotiate in good faith to agree such change. The City Permits issued to LACMTA or a LACMTA Contractor will include provisions for maintenance and cleaning of the haul routes.

4. INTERRUPTIONS
(a) The Parties acknowledge that certain compon ents of the work in the City Portion will require interruption of the City services . The Parties will agree on a plan for any such interruptions and, subject to City approval of the plan, the City cons ents to scheduled interruption of services deemed necessary by LACMTA. LACMTA must provide the City prior Notice before the City services are interrupted.
(b) LACMTA will notify affected parties, including resi dents, businesses, Council office, and other elected officials in advance of scheduled interruptions and will cooperate with the City to minimize interruption of the City services and result ing disruptions, provided that notification may be delayed where 216 of 745

50 LACMTA is required to interrupt services in the event of emergency. Where the City determines that Temporary Facilities are necessary and appropriate, LACMTA shall accommodate this request.

5. CONSTRUCTION STAGING PLANS

5.1 General Requirements
(a) LACMTA or the LACMTA Contractors shall develop a construction staging plan ( "Construction Staging Plan" ) for any Construction work to be performe d within the Public Rights-of-Way. The Staging Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City. (b) The City acknowledges that the Construction wo rk to be performed by LACMTA or the LACMTA Contractors within the Public Rights-of-Way is intended to be performed progressively under multiple contractual packages and the Construction Staging Plans described in this EXHIBIT 8 may, therefore, be prepared for each contractual package or for a portion of such Construction work. (c) A Construction Staging Plan shall provide, among other things, for:
(i) the handling of vehicular, bicycle, pedestria n and transit traffic on streets adjacent to the Construction with the Construction phasing showing street closures, detours, warning devices and other pertinent information specified on the plan (worksite traffic control plans); (ii) actions to maintain acce ss to businesses adjacent to the Construction areas, as possible, and actions to ensure safe access and circulation for pedestrians, bicyclists and vehicular and transit traffic as described in the worksite traffic control plans; and (iii) elements of public awareness as well as mec hanisms to assist affected parties in complaint resolutions.
(d) The City understands that LACMTA requires flexibility in the exec ution of Construction phasing and traffic management planning during Constructi on, and agrees to impose only the minimum requirements for traffic management planning and Co nstruction sequencing that are necessary in order to provide for public health and safety (i ncluding pedestrian, vehicular, transit, and bicycle safety), and functionality (including public and business access and circulation). (e) LACMTA or LACMTA Contractors will comply wit h the Construction General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (currently SWRCB Order No. 2022-0057-DWQ), and with all applicable stormwater requirements imposed by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board. LACMTA shall be responsible for ensuring that all Project work performed by or on its behalf complies with such requirements. Nothing in this Agreement will be construed to limit the City's right s or obligations as co-permittee under the applicable Municipal Se parate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit. The Parties will coordinate with each other regarding si te-specific stormwater issues to address any regulatory obligations under the permit, as required. The Parties shall cooperate in good faith to address any site-specific issues arising from t he Project and work cooperatively to address any regulatory inquiries or compliance actions related to this Project.

5.2 Specific Requirements – Street Lighting Systems
LACMTA or the LACMTA Contractor s shall develop street lighting Cons truction Staging Plans, which shall provide, among other things, for:
(a) the safety and security at nighttime of vehicu lar, pedestrian, transit, and bicycle traffic on streets adjacent to Construction, with the street lighting Construction Staging Plans showing street closures, detours, lighting devices, circuit and power service connections, and other pertinent information; and 217 of 745

51 (b) lighting levels to maintain safe access to bus inesses adjacent to the Construction areas, and to ensure safe circulation for pedestrian and vehicular traffic.

5.3 Specific Requirements – Traffic Management Plan
(a) LACMTA and the City may agree that a street, hi ghway, bridge or the other Public Rights-of-Way shall be temporarily closed for the necessity and convenience of the Constr uction of the NoHo to Pasadena Project. If agreed to, a Traffic Managem ent Plan must be developed and submitted by LACMTA or the LACMTA Contractors, which shall provide, among other things, for worksite traffic control plans, traffic circulation plans, and temporary traffic signal plans. (b) A traffic control plan developed using the Californ ia Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices shall be provided for all traffic control plans and submittal. (c) The City's traffic section staff involved in the re view and approval process shall facilitate the City's internal approvals regarding peak hour exemptions, holiday moratoriums, changes to existing parking restrictions in the work zone, night work, and noise variances. (d) Any Traffic Management Plan must include a requi rement that LACMTA or a LACMTA Contractor shall be responsible for notifying all transit providers of any street closure that affects transit routes or Construction that affects transit stops.

5.4 Review and Implementation of Construction Staging Plans (a) LACMTA (or the relevant LACMTA Contractor (as applicable)) must submit each Construction Staging Plan to the City for revi ew in accordance with EXHIBIT 7 ( LACMTA Submittal Review Procedure).
(b) LACMTA (or the relevant LACMTA Contractor (as applicable)) may update a Construction Staging Plan after it has been approved by the City and must promptly submit each updated Construction Staging Plan to the City for revi ew in accordance with EXHIBIT 7 ( LACMTA Submittal Review Procedure).
(c) LACMTA must, and must ensure that the LACM TA Contractors, implem ent and comply with each Construction Staging Plan which has been submitted to the City and which has been either approved (or deemed approved) under EXHIBIT 7 (LACMTA Submittal Review Procedure).

6. WORK IN STREETS

6.1 General Requirements
(a) The Parties acknowledge that the City has the duties of supervising, maintaining and controlling streets, highways, and the other Public Rights-of-Wa y. Accordingly, LACMTA shall give the City 20 days' advance written Notice where Construction work is to be performed in the Public Rights-of-Way.

All full or directional street closures shall require a minimum 20-day notification. (b) LACMTA and the LACMTA Contractors shall take all appropriate actions to ensure safe performance of the Construction work within the Public Rights-of-Way. The City rese rves the right to stop work if public health and safety is or will be comprised by such work. (c) If LACMTA or a LACMTA Contractor fails to per form any Construction work within the Public Rights- of-Way in accordance with the Final Design and/or Construction Staging Plans approved (or deemed approved) by the City under this Agreement then upon written Notice of the non-compliance from the City, LACMTA must cure or must ensure that the LACMTA Contractor cures, the non-compliance, as soon as reasonably practicable.

6.2 Traffic Control and Lighting
218 of 745

52 LACMTA must provide the City prior Notice before conducting the Traffic Control and Lighting Work that will result in an interruption to service of traffic control devices or lighting systems and LACMTA shall cooperate with the City to minimize such interruption.

6.3 City Communication Facilities
Construction of replacement conduit segments, inner ducts, and manholes that bypass the conflicting conduit segments shall be done prior to relocation of the comm unications cables. In addition, relocation/installation work of communications cables that carry live produc tion traffic shall be scheduled during a maintenance window, in order to minimize system downtime and minimize the City network traffic disruption.

7. TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURES
Upon notification of a proposed tempor ary street closure, the City, as r equested by LACMTA, shall initiate the appropriate proceedings and shall establish the necessary conditions for the closures. LACMTA shall be responsible for any reasonable Costs associated with a requested street closure.

8. TEMPORARY FACILITIES

8.1 LACMTA Facilities
Temporary Facilities may be necessary to facilitate Construction of the NoHo to Pasadena Project (including Rearrangements). In accordance with Section4.3(c) (Rights-of-Way) of this Agreement, the City shall provide reasonable assistance as may be required for LACMTA to obtain rights-of-way necessary to construct the City Portion. This shall include considering reasonable requests by LACMTA for LACMTA or its designee to use lands owned or controlled by the City for, the erection and use of Temporary Facilities thereon; provided that, the City shall first approve in writing the availab ility, location and duration of the Temporary Facilities, with the City's approval not to be unreasonably withheld. Upon completion of the related Construction and LACMTA's determination that the Te mporary Facilities no longer are n eeded, LACMTA shall remove all Temporary Facilities and restore the ar ea as nearly as practicable to its original condition unless LACMTA and the City agree to some other arrangement.

8.2 City Facilities
In the event that Temporary Facilities are necessary to effect a Rearrangement being constructed by the City, the City or its designee may use, without cost, lands owned or controlled by LACMTA for the purpose of using or erecting Temporary Facilities thereon; provided that, LACMTA shall first approve in writing the availability, location and duration of the Temporary Facilities. U pon completion of the Rearrangement in its permanent location, the City shall remove all Temporary Facilities and restore the area as nearly as practicable to its original condition unless the City and LACMTA agree to some other arrangement.

9. UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT
Prior to any commencement of underground work by ei ther Party, an "Underground Service Alert" shall be notified in accordance with California law by such Party or its contractor.

10. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS
All Construction work performed by the City or City Contractors pursuant to this Agreement shall comply with the environmental controls established by LACMTA in the LACMTA Contra cts, including construction noise and vibration control, pollution controls, archaeological coordination and paleontological coordination and use of 'Best Management Practices'.

11. SALVAGED MATERIALS
The Parties may agree to salvage certain materials belonging to the City during the course of Rearrangement.

If materials belonging to the City are to be reused, LACMTA 's contractor shall exercise reasonable care in 219 of 745

53 removal and storage of such materials. Materials shall be inspected and stored until such time as the progress of work allows the reinstallation of such materials. Materials that are not to be reused in a Rearrangement, but which the City desires to reclaim, may be recovered by the City staff within an agreed time frame or shall be delivered by LACMTA to a location proximate to the salvage site and suitable to the City. Subject to acceptance by LACMTA, if materials removed by LA CMTA are not reused and are not desired by the City, such materials shall become the property of LACMTA.

12. AS-BUILT DRAWINGS

12.1 LACMTA and the City shall each maintain a set of "as-built" plans of Rearrangements performed by LACMTA and the City, respectively, during Construction. Red line mark-ups for temporary lighting systems, traffic signal systems, and other the City Facilitie s shall be submitted to the City and LACMTA within 15 days after completion of Construction. All Design changes shall be documented on RFI/RFC forms. Upon completion of the Rearrangement work, the Party t hat performed the work shall furnis h the other Party with reproducible "as-built" drawings showing all Replacement Facilities installed by the performing Party, within 75 days after completion of such work for each set of plans.

12.2 LACMTA and the City agree to provide the other with electronic files and full-size paper hard copies of those final contract documents that they have prepared, or caused to be prepared, to govern the Construction of a given Rearrangement by their respective contractor so that each Party may compile a complete set of contract documents. Each Party shall prepare or cause to be prepared the contract documents for which it is responsible.
220 of 745

54 EXHIBIT 9 – INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE

1. Substantial Completion

1.1 The following requirements must be satisfied to achi eve substantial completion of a Rearrangement (or a part of a Rearrangement that is capable of being accepted in advance of completion of the whole) ("Substantial Completion"):
(a) LACMTA (or the applicable LACMTA Contractor) has completed the work for the Rearrangement (or applicable part of the Rearrangement) except for P unch List items or outst anding work that is otherwise only required to be performed under this Agreement for the purposes of achieving Final Acceptance;
(b) all known defects or omissions in the work for the Rearrangement (or applicable part of the Rearrangement) have been remedied (other than Punch List items); and (c) the Rearrangement (or applicable part of the Re arrangement) is ready for handover to the City in accordance with the requirements set out under this Agreement.

1.2 If LACMTA considers that the requ irements for Substantial Completion of a Rearrangement (or the applicable part of the Rearrangement) have been sati sfied in accordance with Section 1.1 ( Substantial Completion) of this EXHIBIT 9, LACMTA shall submit a Notice to the City requesting a Statement of Substantial Completion in the form set out as Attachment 1 to this EXHIBIT 9EXHIBIT 9 . LACMTA may issue a Notice under this Section 1.2 notwithstanding that there are known Punch List items or outstanding work that is otherwise only required to be performed under this Agreement for the purposes of achieving Final Acceptance, provided that LACMTA's Notice shall include the list of proposed Punch List items.

1.3 Within ten days (or such longer time period as may be agreed to by the Parties) of delivery of a Notice by LACMTA requesting a Statem ent of Substantial Comp letion, the City's designated final inspector ("City Inspector") and LACMTA will together inspect t he Rearrangement (or the applicable part of the Rearrangement) to determine its status of completion and to agree the list of Punch List items.

1.4 Within 2 days (or such longer time period as may be agr eed to by the Parties) of completion of the inspection of the applicable part of the Rearrangement, the City will either:
(a) if the City accepts the Rearr angement (or applicable part of t he Rearrangement) as Substantially Complete in accordance with the terms of this Agreement subject to any agreed Punch List items and the work that is otherwise only r equired to be performed under this Agreement for the purposes of achieving Final Acceptance, iss ue a Statement of Substantial Co mpletion, together with the Punch List items agreed by LACMTA and the City following inspection of the Rearrangement (or applicable part of the Rearrangement); or
(b) if the City determines that the Rearrangement (or applicable part of the Rearrangement) has not yet achieved Substantial Completion in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, reject by Notice LACMTA's request, together with a list of the corrections required to complete the Rearrangement (or applicable part of the Rearrangement) in accordance with the terms of this Agreement ("Substantial Completion Correction List"). Punch List items or outstanding work that is otherwise only required to be performed under this agreement for the purpos es of achieving Final Acceptance, will not be a sufficient basis for rejecting a request for a Statement of Substantial Completion. Any such rejection must be on the basis that the work that is outstanding is sufficiently material in nature to prevent the safe use or operation of the Rearrangement (or applicable part of the Rearrangement).

1.5 If the City rejects a request for a St atement of Substantial Completion for a Rearrangement (or any part of a Rearrangement), LACMTA shall perform the corrections set out under the Substantial Completion Correction List, following which LACMTA will again deliver a Notice requesting a Statement of Substantial Completion. 221 of 745

55 1.6 Promptly after issuance of a St atement of Substantial Co mpletion, LACMTA (or the LACMTA Contractors) will complete all work items on the Punch List attached to the Statement of Substantial Completion and satisfy all of its other obligations under this Agreement required to be comple ted before final acceptance for that Rearrangement, including submittal of applicable "as-built" drawings for that Rearrangement.

1.7 If LACMTA does not agree with the Cit y Inspector's rejection of a reques t for a Statement of Substantial Completion or the corrections listed by the City Inspector under a Substant ial Completion Correction List or if the Parties are unable to agree on the Punch List it ems, the matter will be referr ed to the issue resolution ladder under EXHIBIT 4 (Roles and Responsibilities) of this Agreement.

2. Statement of Final Acceptance

2.1 The following requirements must be satisfied to achieve Final Acceptance of a Rearrangement (" Final Acceptance"):
(a) the entire work for that Rearrangement is fully completed; (b) all Punch List items for that Rearrangement (or fo r all parts of that Rearrangement where Substantial Completion of a part was permitted) are completed; and
(c) LACMTA (or the applicable LACMTA Contracto r) has delivered all "as-built" drawings for the Rearrangement.

2.2 If LACMTA considers that the requirements for Fi nal Acceptance of a Rearrangement have been satisfied in accordance with Section 2.1 of this EXHIBIT 9, LACM TA shall submit a Notice to the City requesting a Statement of Final Acceptance.

2.3 Within ten days (or such longer time period as may be agreed to by the Parties) of delivery of a Notice by LACMTA requesting a Statement of Final Acceptance, the City Inspector and LACMTA will together inspect the Rearrangement to determine its status of completion.

2.4 Within two days (or such longer time period as may be agreed to by the Parties) of completion of the inspection of the applicable part of the Rearrangement, the City will either:
(a) if the City accepts that t he requirements for Final Accept ance of the Rearrangement have been achieved, issue a Statement of Final Acceptance; or
(b) if the City determines that t he requirements for Final Acceptanc e of the Rearrangement have not been achieved, reject by Notice LACMTA's request, together with a list of the corrections required to satisfy the requirements for Final Acceptance of the Rearrangement in accordance with the terms of this Agreement ("Final Acceptance Correction List").

2.5 If the City rejects a request for a Statement of Final Acceptance for a Rearrangement, LACMTA shall perform the corrections set out under the Final Acceptance Correction List, following which LACMTA will again deliver a Notice requesting a Statement of Final Acceptance.

2.6 If LACMTA does not agree with t he corrections listed by the City In spector under a Final Acceptance Correction List, the matter will be referred to the i ssue resolution ladder set out in EXHIBIT 4 ( Roles and Responsibilities) of this Agreement.

3. Responsibility to Complete the Work

3.1 Where a Statement of S ubstantial Completion is issued with res pect to a part (and not the whole) of a Rearrangement, LACMTA shall retain full responsibility for completion of the whole of the Rearrangement.

3.2 The issuance of a Statement of Substantial Completion for a Rearrangement (or a part of a Rearrangement) shall not relieve LACMTA of its obligation to complete the work for the Punch List items and to promptly 222 of 745

56 remedy any omissions and latent or unnoticed defects in the Rearrangement cove red by the Statement of Substantial Completion in accordance with the warranties under Section 8.2 (Warranty) of this Agreement.

3.3 Until a Statement of Substantial Completion is issued for a Rea rrangement (or the applicable part of it), all responsibility for care and maintenance of the Rearrangement (or the applicable part of it) shall be borne by LACMTA. The City will be responsible for the mainte nance, loss, or damage to a Rearrangement (or the applicable part of a Rearrangement) un der a Statement of Subs tantial Completion upon issuance of that Statement of Substantial Completion except that:
(a) in accordance with Sections 3.1 and 3.2 above, it shall be LACMTA's continuing responsibility to complete and deliver every part, and the integrated whole, of the Rearrangement and to satisfy the conditions to Final Acceptance of that Rearrangement; and (b) responsibility and liability will remain with LACMTA to the extent of the warranties under Section 8.2 (Warranty) of this Agreement.

3.4 To the extent that LACMTA (or a LACMTA Contractor) fails to leave the Public Rights-of-Way in a clean, neat, and orderly condition upon completion of the Rearrangements and with all Temporary Facilities removed and the area restored in accordance with Section 8 ( Temporary Facilities ) of EXHIBIT 8 ( Construction Requirements), the City may by Notice to LACMTA suspend LACMTA's obligation to perform such clean-up and restoration activities and perform the clean-up and re storation activities utilizing City personnel or City Contractor. To the extent the City takes over such clean-up and restoration activities, LACMTA shall reimburse the City for Costs properly incurred in performing such clean-up activities pursuant to a Work Order agreed under Section 2.3 (Work Orders) of this Agreement or otherwise under Section 8.1 (Indemnity) of this Agreement.

223 of 745

57 EXHIBIT 10 - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PRINCIPLES

1. PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES

1.1 LACMTA (directly or through the LACMTA Contractor s) will be responsible for the operation and maintenance of the NoHo to Pasadena Project.

1.2 The City (directly or through the City Contractors) will be responsible for:
(a) the maintenance of all City Facilities within t he Public Rights-of-Way including trees, gutters, sidewalks, ramps, streets, roadways, utilities, vaults, pull boxes, lights, signals, City loops, striping, signage, irrigation, bio swales and landscaping outside the BRT canopies and amenities; and (b) operation of the traffic signal system withi n the jurisdiction and control of the City.

1.3 As described in Article 6 ( Operation and Maintenance) of the Agreement, the City and LACMTA will discuss in good faith and agree the detailed operation and main tenance responsibilities of each of the Parties, including with respect to the following:
(a) all BRT station facilities including sh elters, fixtures, and trash receptacles; (b) LACMTA specific signage;
(c) BRT station lighting;
(d) Boarding pads;
(d)(e) ADA improvements;
(e)(f) dedicated bus lane policy particulars and enforcement; (f)(g) bus positions and route info on stations shared with City local buses; (g)(h) TSP equipment maintenance and adjustments;
(h)(i) pavement maintenance; and
(i)(j) striping maintenance.

With respect to its responsibility for the operation of the traffic signal system within the jurisdiction and control of the City, the City shall work cooperatively with LACMTA to facilitate the safe and efficient operation of the City Portion. The City shall not modify the traffic si gnal model controller software on the City Portion without notification to and coordination with LACMTA.

2. MAINTENANCE OF THE CITY PORTION
LACMTA shall obtain appropriate permits from the City when performing maintenance work on or near the Public Rights-of-Way and conform to all of the City's permitting requirements for the submittal, review, and approval of temporary traffic control plans, use of Public Rights-of-Way, or any other activity requiring a permit or license in accordance with the City use of public property permit process and application and requirements for traffic control plans. All traffic control devices shall conform to accepted City practices and shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the California Manua l on Uniform Traffic Contro l Devices. All City staff costs incurred for permitting such work shall be reimbursed by LACMTA through the Work Order process set forth in this Agreement.
224 of 745

58 3. UTILITY CONTRACTS
The City will provide electric and water service and se rvice restoration in accordance with the City-owned Utility rules and regulations.

EXHIBIT 11 –FORMS
Part A: Form 60
Name of Offeror/Contractor/Utility Company (Name of
Preparer):

Scope of Work/Deliverable (provide expanded
description on Form 60 page 2)
Home office address

Division(s) and Locations where Work is to be performed

LACMTA Solicitation/Proposal/Contract
Number/Work Order/Change Notice and/or Change
Order Reference Number(s):

NOTE: For proper calculations of cost elements link additional sheets to this summary page.

1. Direct Labor Est.

Hours
Rate Per
Hour
Est. Cost TOTAL

2. 0.00 $0.00 $0.00

3. 0.00 $0.00 $0.00

4. 0.00 $0.00 $0.00

5. TOTAL DIRECT LABOR HOURS 0.00 TOTAL DIRECT LABOR $0.00

6. Labor Overhead (O/H) O/H Ra te x Base Est. Cost

7. 0% $0.00

8. TOTAL LABOR OVERHEAD $0.00

9. Direct Material Est. Cost

10. a. Purchase Parts $0.00

11. b. Subcontracted items $0.00

12. c. Other $0.00

13. TOTAL DIRECT MATERIAL $0.00

14. Equipment Unit Cost Est. Cost

15. $0.00 $0.00

16. $0.00 $0.00

17. TOTAL EQUIPMENT $0.00

18. Subcontractors* Est. Cost

19. $0.00

20. $0.00

21. $0.00

22. TOTAL SUBCONTRACTORS $0.00

23. TOTAL BURDENED COST (add lines 5, 8, 13, 17 and 22) $0.00

24. Other Direct Costs Est. Cost

25. $0.00

26. $0.00

27. $0.00

28. TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $0.00

29. Travel Est. Cost

30. a. Transportation $0.00

31. b. Per Diem or Subsistence $0.00

32. TOTAL TRAVEL $0.00

33. General and Administrative
Expense
Rate % % x Line 23

34. 0% $0.00

35. TOTAL GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE $0.00

36. TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS (Total Lines 23, 28, 32 and 35) $0.00 225 of 745

59 37. Profit/Fee Total Labor and
Overhead
(line 5 + line 8)
Rate % % x Total Labor and Overhead

38. ` 0% $0.00

39. TOTAL FEE $0.00

40. TOTAL ESTIMATED PRICE (Total of Lines 36 and 39) $0.00

41. Milestone
/Task
Number
Milestones/Tasks Hours Completion
Date
Payment Amount

42. $0.00

43. $0.00

44. $0.00

45. TOTAL MILESTONES/TASKS (Must equal line 40) $0.00 * Attach Form 60 for all proposed subcontractors performing work under Form 60 Prime Contractor where applicable. Transfer Est. Cost to this Section.

46. Fill in applicable sections only

47. Has any Agency of the United States Government, State government, local public agency or the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA) performed any review of your account or records, overhead rates and general and administrative rates in connection with any public prime contract or subcontract within the past twelve months? Yes No If yes, when? Reference Contract No.

48.a. Agency Name/Address

48.b. Individual to contact/Telephone Number

49. As required by LACMTA, firms not audited, as described above, shall submit financial data and calculations in sufficient detail to support all proposed direct costs and subcontractor costs.

50. The proposal reflects our estimates and/or actual costs as of the date and by submitting this proposal, Proposer/Consultant grants to LACMTA Contracting Officer and authorized representative(s) the right to examine, at any time before award, those records, which include books, documents, accounting procedures and practices, and other supporting data, regardless of type and form or whether such supporting information is specifically referenced or included in the proposal as the basis for pricing, that will permit an adequate evaluation of such cost or pricing data, along with the computations and projections used therein, for the purpose of verifying the cost or pricing data submitted. This right may also be exercised in connection with any negotiations/discussions prior to contract award or execution of contract modification.

51. CERTIFICATE
The labor rates and overhead costs are current and other estimated costs have been determined by generally accepted accounting principles. Proposer/Consultant represents: (a) that it has , has not , employed or retained any company or person (other than a full time bona fide employee working solely for the Proposer/Consultant) to solicit or secure a contract, and (b) that it has , has not , paid or agreed to pay to any company or person (other than a full time bona fide employee working solely for the Proposer/Consultant) any fee, commission, percentage or brokerage fee, contingent upon or resulting from the award of this contract, and agrees to information relating to (a) and (b) above, as requested by the Contracting Officer.

52. CERTIFICATE OF CURRENT COST OR PRICING DATA
This is to certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the cost or pricing data (as defined in Section 2.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) and required under subsection 15.403-4) submitted, either actually or by specific identification in writing, to LACMTA's Contracting Officer or to LACMTA's Contracting Officer's representative in support of ______________________* are accurate, complete and current as of ________________________**. This certification includes the cost or pricing data supporting any advance agreements and forward pricing rate agreements between the Proposer/Consultant/Contractor and LACMTA that are a part of the proposal.

53. This proposal as submitted represents our best estimates and/or actual costs as of this date.

54. Type Name and Title of Authorized Representative Signature Date***

55. * Identify the proposal, quot ation, request for price adjustment, or other submission involved, giving appropriate identifying number (e.g. Information For Bid No., Work Order No., Request for Proposal No., Change Order No., Modification No., etc.)

56. ** Insert the day, month and year wh en price negotiations were concluded and price agreement was reached.
226 of 745

60 57. *** Insert the day, month and year of si gning (i.e., When price negotiations were concluded and mutual agreement was reached on contract price).

Form 60 Attachments (Applicable if Box is checked)
Scope of Work Expanded Description for which Cost Estimate is based on:
1 2

3 4

Schedule in which Scope of Work is based on:
1 2

3 4

The Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) provisions (a s set out in the NDA between City and LACMTA) are applicable to the following Form 60-specific items:
1 2

3 4

Track Allocation Request for Me tro active bus rapid right-of-way encroachment is anticipated per stated Scope of Work. The following information is provided in advance to facilitate final Metro TAR approval:
1 2

3 4

FORM 60 IS SIGNED AND EXECUTED WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL ASSUMPTIONS:
1 CITY AS-BUILT RESEARCH BY CITY FOR METRO PROJECTS IN THE PLANNING PHASE SHALL BE

TREATED AS PART OF LABOR OVERHEAD PORTION OF COST

227 of 745

61 Part B - City Betterment Request Form1

CITY BETTERMENT REQUEST
Date: _________________
To: The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA) From: City of Glendale (City)
Subject Scope/ Scope Element: ____________________________________________ Project: NoHo to Pasadena Project (Project)
Pursuant to the cooperative agreement (CA) between the City and LACMTA with respect to the Project, this shall serve as a formal Notice that the following design and/or construction scope is requested to be delivered as a Betterment as defined within the CA.

Scope of requested Betterment:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ The determination of the Betterment is based on the CA and the following justification:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ The City requests LACMTA's response to this City Betterment Request as set out below.

CITY OF GLENDALE
By:___________________________
Name: ________________________
Title: _________________________
Date:_________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ LACMTA has reviewed the above City Betterment Request and:

1. rejects the requested Betterment in accordance with the CA on the basis that the Betterment is:
 incompatible with the Project;
 cannot be performed within the constraints of Applicable Law, any applicable Governmental Approvals, and/or the Project Schedule; or
 requested after establishment of the Basis of Design for the Subject Transportation Project.

1 Please refer to Article 6. This is the form that would be used for the City to identify/request the design and construction of Betterments at its cost. You will see that the form also incorporates responses from LACMTA, approving or rejecting the Betterment and providing an estimated cost. The reasons for rejecting a Betterment listed here are aligned with the provisions of Article 6. 228 of 745

62 2. approves the Betterment in accordance with the CA subject to the following changes or terms as negotiated with the City (if none, enter "none"): An estimated cost is listed below:

Design Costs: $______________ Construction Costs: $_________________ LACMTA requests that the Cit y counter-sign below to confirm its agreem ent to any changes or additional terms described above and the estimated cost.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY By:___________________________
Name: ________________________
Title: _________________________
Date: _________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________ The City accepts the amendments or additional terms agreed and listed above and the design and construction cost estimates for the Betterment. The City acknowledges and agrees that in accordance with the terms of the CA, the City shall be solely responsible for all costs related to the Be tterment (whether or not such costs exceed the estimates for the Betterment provided by LACMTA).

CITY OF GLENDALE
By:___________________________
Name: ________________________
Title: _________________________
Date: _________________________

229 of 745

63 Part C – LACMTA Notice of Potential Betterment2
Date: _________________
To: City of Glendale (City)
From: The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA) Subject Scope/ Scope Element: ____________________________________________ Project: NoHo to Pasadena Project (Project)
Pursuant to the cooperative agreement (CA) between the City and LACMTA, this shall serve as a formal Notice the following City comment or request with respect to the Design Documentation and/or Construction plans or work for the Project has been identified as a potential Betterment as defined within the CA.

Scope of City comment or request identified as a potential Betterment (including reference number or other identification of the relevant City comment or request):
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ The City comment or request has been identified as a potential Betterment based on the Agreement and the following justification:
 if implemented, the City comment or request w ould comprise an upgrade, change or addition to a City Facility (or a part of a City Fa cility) that provides for greater capacity, capability, durability, appearance, efficiency or function or other betterment s of that City Facility over that which was provided by the City Facility prior to the Project and none of the exclusions listed in the CA apply; or  If implemented, the City comment or request would comprise a change in or supplement to, the City Standards applicable to that work after the est ablishment of the Basis of Design and none of the exclusions listed in the CA apply.

Details:_______________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ LACMTA requests the City's response to this LACMTA Notice of Potential Betterment as set out below. In accordance with Article 5 ( Betterments) of the CA, if the City fails to respond within 10 days of this LACMTA Notice of Potential Betterment, the relevant City comment or request will be deemed to be withdrawn provided that such deemed withdrawal shall be without prejudice to the City's right to submit the Betterm ent under a subsequent City Betterment Request under Article 5 (Betterments) of the CA.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY By:___________________________
Name: ________________________
Title: _________________________
Date: _________________________

2 Please refer to Article 6. This is the form that would be us ed by LACMTA if it identifies a City request or comment as a potential Betterment.

The reasons for identifying a City request or comment as a potential Betterment listed in the form are intended to align with the definition of Betterment. It also includes a response form from the City, withdrawing the comment or enclosing a City Betterment Request. 230 of 745

64 The City has reviewed the above LACMTA Notice of Potential Betterment and:
 withdraws the relevant City comment or request referenced in the above LACMTA Notice of Potential Betterment; or
 submits the City comment or requ est referenced in the above LACMTA Notice of Potential Betterment as a City request for a Betterment in accordance with Article 5 ( Betterments) of the CA and for this purpose encloses a completed City Betterment Request.

CITY OF GLENDALE
By:___________________________
Name: ________________________
Title: _________________________
Date: _________________________

231 of 745

65 EXHIBIT 12 – CITY-PERFORMED PROJECT WORK

1. Request for the City to Perform Design and/or Construction work

1.1 In accordance with Sections 3.1(b)(ii) ( Design Responsibilities) and 4.1(b)(ii) (Construction Responsibilities) of this Agreement, LACMTA may request by Notice that the City prepare a cost estimate and proposal for the City to perform Design work and/or Construction work with respect to the City Po rtion of the NoHo to Pasadena (rather than a Rearrangement) (" City-Performed Project Work" ). The request submitted by LACMTA shall set out:
(a) the proposed scope, criteria , specifications, and requirement s for the proposed City-Performed Project Work including with respect to Utility Conflicts (taking account of the information identified and agreements reached under EXHIBIT 5 (Utility Adjustment Procedures)); (b) any prescribed governmental and lender require ments applicable to the proposed City-Performed Project Work under applicable grant, funding or financing agreements; and (c) the then current Project Schedule and propos ed schedule for the City-Performed Project Work, including the proposed dates for providing the City and the City Contractors with access to the Project Right-of-Way.

1.2 Promptly (and in any event within 15 days or any other time period agreed by the Parties) after submission of a Notice by LACMTA under Section 1.1 above, t he Parties will meet to discuss the request and following such meeting the City will, within 15 days of that meeting, Notify LACMTA if it is not able to perform or procure the City-Performed Project Work or will otherwise, within 30 days of that meeting, provide LACMTA with:
(a) the City's estimate for the Cost of procuring and performing the City-Performed Project Work; and (b) any City comments to the proposed scope, criter ia, specifications, requirements, and schedule for the City-Performed Project Work.

1.3 The Parties will discuss in good faith the cost es timate and comments submitted by the City and mutually agree the scope, criteria, specifications, requirements , cost estimates, and schedule for the proposed City- Performed Project Work.

1.4 If the Parties agree that the City will proceed with a procurement fo r the City-Performed Project Work, the City will submit a Form 60 in accordance with Section 2.3 ( Work Orders) of this Agreement, and following agreement of the Parties, LACMTA will issue a Work Order authorizing the procurement of the City-Performed Project Work.

2. Schedule for the City-Performed Project Work

2.1 The schedule agreed by the Parties for the procur ement and performance of any City-Performed Project Work will be aligned with, and allow for, the timely delivery of the City Portion in accordance with the Project Schedule.

2.2 If at any time the City becomes aw are of any delay to the procurement or performance of any City-Performed Project Work, the City shall promptly give Notice to LACMTA to that effect specifying the reason for the delay and the estimated impact to the agreed schedule.

3. Constructability Reviews of Designs for the City-Performed Project Work Where the City-Performed Project Work for a Project includes only Construction work (and not the preparation of the Designs for that Construc tion work) then, if requested by LACMTA, agreed by the Parties and authorized under a Work Order, the City or a City Contractor (if inclu ded as part of a procurement under Article 4 ( Procurement of City-Performed Project Work ) of this EXHIBIT 12) will perform Design support services prior to commencing the City-Performed Project Work, including performing constructability reviews. 232 of 745

66 4. Procurement of City-Performed Project Work

4.1 Any procurement for City-Performed Project Work that will not be performed by City forces shall be performed:
(a) on the basis of full and open competition;
(b) utilizing the agreed scope, criter ia, specifications, and requirement s applicable to the scope of the City-Performed Project Work that is being procured;
(c) in accordance with the requirements set out in th is EXHIBIT 12 or otherwise under the provisions of this Agreement;
(d) in accordance with the applicable Annual Wo rk Plan and Work Order(s), including the agreed schedule set out under that Annual Work Plan and those Work Order(s); and (e) in accordance with all Governmental Approval s, Applicable Law, and any additional prescribed governmental and lender requirements under the app licable grant, funding or financing agreements notified to the City in accordance with Section 2.8 (Governmental and Lender Requirements) of this Agreement.

4.2 Prior to advertising a procurement for the performance (in whole or in part) of City-Performed Project Work, the City shall provide LACMTA with t he draft procurement documents, in cluding the draft contractual terms and conditions, intended to be issued by the City for t hat work. LACMTA will review the draft procurement documents and provide comments to the City. The Part ies will discuss in good faith and resolve comments submitted by LACMTA and mutually agree the form of procurement document s to be issued by the City. If the Parties are unable to agree the form of procurement documents, LACMTA may withdraw the request for City-Performed Project Work in accordance with Section 4.4 below.

4.3 LACMTA shall have the right to require a minimum num ber of bids or proposals, to review the bids or proposals received, and to approve the recommendation for contract award prior to presentation to the City Council for award. The City agrees that it shall not present a contract for any part of City-Performed Project Work for to the City Council for award until the bidder or proposer proposed for award has been approved by LACMTA.

4.4 LACMTA reserves the right (in its sole discretion) to withdraw the request for City-Performed Project Work at any time during procurement and to r equire that the City canc el the procurement and reject all bids or proposals, if received at the time of withdrawal, provided that LACMTA shall be required to reimburse the City for the costs of services in coordinating and managing the procurement in accordance with the terms of the applicable Work Order.

5. Performance of City-Performed Project Work

5.1 After review and approval of any contract award under Article 4 (Procurement of City-Performed Project Work) of this EXHIBIT 12 and the City's submission of a Form 60 in accordance with Section 2.3 ( Work Orders) of this Agreement, LACMTA will issue a Work Order authorizing the performance of the City-Performed Project Work (or a part of it, as applicable). The payment terms for the City-Performed Project Work will be mutually agreed by the Parties under that Work Order.

5.2 Any City-Performed Project Work shal l be performed in accordance with:
(a) in the case of any Construction work, the Final Design for the City-Perform ed Project Work that is approved-for-construction;
(b) the requirements set out in this EXHIBIT 12 or otherwise under the provisions of this Agreement, and the agreed scope, criteria, specifications, requirements, and contractual terms and conditions; 233 of 745

67 (c) the environmental controls established in the LA CMTA Contracts for the NoHo to Pasadena Project, including construction noise and vibration contro l, pollution controls, and archaeological and paleontological coordination;
(d) the applicable Annual Work Plan and Work Orde r(s), including the agreed schedule set out under that Annual Work Plan and those Work Order(s);
(e) the Project Right-of-Way constraints and othe r physical limits affecting the City Portion; and (f) the FEIR and all other applicable Government al Approvals, Applicable Law, and any additional prescribed governmental and lender requirements under the applicable grant, funding or financing agreements notified to the City in accordance with Section 2.8 ( Governmental and Lender Requirements) of this Agreement.

5.3 In performing any City-Performed Project Work, the City and any City Contractors, must comply with all quality assurance, quality control, and qu ality management requirements set out in the agreed scope, criteria, specifications, and requirements, and in accordance with Applicable Law.

5.4 In performing any City-Performed Project Work, the City and any City Contractors shall coordinate their work with the work of LACMTA and the LACMTA Contractors, including as defined under any interface requirements set out in the agreed scope, criteria, specifications, requ irements, and contractual terms and conditions.

5.5 The City will obtain LACMTA's approval for any modifica tions to any City Contract for City-Performed Project Work and in any event shall inform LACMTA promptly when the City has reason to believe that the agreed Cost estimate for the City-Performed Project Work is likely to be exceeded, and shall obtain LACMTA authorization of such a Cost increase under Section 2.3 (Work Orders) of this Agreement.

6. Inspection
All City-Performed Project Work will be subject to in spection in accordance with the agreed scope, criteria, specifications, requirements, and contractual terms and conditions.

7. Debarred Contractors
In accordance with California Public Contract Code Section 6109(a), the City shall not perform City-Performed Project Work with any contractor who is ineligible to perform work on a public works project pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1777.1 or Section 1777.7. In accordance with California Public Contract Code Section 6109(b), any contract on a public works pr oject entered into between the City and a debarred contractor is void as a matter of law. A debarred contractor may not receive any public money for performing work as a contractor on a public works contract, and any public money that may have been paid to a debarred contractor by the City for City-Performed Project Work shall be returned to LACMTA. The City shall be responsible for the payment of wages to workers of a debarred contractor who has been allowed by the City to perform any City-Performed Project Work. The Parties agree to strictly comply with the Applicable Law and will act on information related to any debarred contractor in accordance with Applicable Law.

234 of 745

NORTH HOLLYWOOD TO PASADENA

BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT)

GLENDALE SEGMENT

EXHIBIT 2: PROJECT LOCATION MAP
235 of 745

10c

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Side Letter Agreement Between the City and Glendale Police Officers’ Association (GPOA)

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for 6/23/2026 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
As a contracting agency of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS), the City of Glendale is subject to statutory and regulatory requirements that govern whether compensation is reportable for pension calculation purposes. The Public Employees’ Retirement Law (PERL), the Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA), and the California Code of Regulations (CCR) require that contracting agencies must accurately reflect information related to compensation items in approved documentation. For compensation paid in addition to base salary, this must include the relevant intent, eligibility criteria, and conditions of payment.

By way of letter dated November 17, 2025, CalPERS determined that compensation paid and reported to CalPERS for Administrative Assignment Program and Police Agent Program were not compliant under the PERL for a retired Police Officer. The basis for the determination was that the conditions of payment were not contained in a written labor policy or agreement, a requirement under the PERL. The City submitted an appeal on behalf of the Police Officer on January 23, 2026. Separately, in a letter dated November 5, 2025, CalPERS determined that compensation paid and reported as Longevity Pay and Motorcycle Patrol Premium on behalf of a current Police Officer was also non-compliant. The basis for the determination was that the payment of such items was not consistent with the terms contained in the relevant written labor policy or agreement, a requirement under the PERL.

The City has been working with special counsel from Best Best & Krieger, with expertise on CalPERS requirements, to prepare a side letter to the July 1, 2024 through June 30, 236 of 745

210c
6 8
9 9
2027 Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the Glendale Police Officers’ Association containing revised language to address the concerns raised by CalPERS. The side letter has been submitted to the CalPERS MOU Review Unit for a compliance statement. If the compliance statement is not received in time, this item will be deferred to a subsequent meeting.

RECOMMENDATION

1. Approve the Side Letter modifying the Longevity Pay, Police Agent Lead Program, Motorcycle Duty, and Police Administrative Officer Pay bringing it into compliance for GPOA employees, past retirees, and future retirees.

ANALYSIS
Special compensation encompasses items paid in addition to base salary that align with the exclusive list of items identified under Title 2 California Code Regulations (“CCR”) section 571(a) for classic CalPERS members and CCR section 571.1(b) for PEPRA CalPERS members. Further, all special compensation must meet the requirements listed under Title 2 CCR section 571(b) for classic CalPERS members and section 571.1(a) for PEPRA CalPERS members.

Longevity Pay
The City’s longevity compensation aligns with “Longevity Pay” special compensation for CalPERS as defined under CCR sections 571 and 571.1.

Longevity Pay is defined in CCR section 571 as follows:
“Additional compensation to employees who have been with an employer, or in a specified job classification, for a certain minimum period of time exceeding five years.”
CalPERS determined the “sworn police officer” eligibility criterion used in the GPOA MOU did not qualify as a specified job classification, and it must be based on “police officer” only. After researching the matter, City staff determined there is no difference in application of longevity pay between “sworn police officer” and “police officer” either historically or for future periods. As such, the Side Letter removes the word “sworn.” Police Agent Program
Compensation reported to CalPERS as Detective Division Premium was for Police Agent Program pay and most closely aligns with the definition of “Lead Worker/Supervisor Premium” special compensation CCR sections 571 and 571.1.

Lead Worker/Supervisor Premium is defined in CCR section 571 as follows:
237 of 745

310c
6 8
9 9
“Compensation to employees who are routinely and consistently assigned to a lead or supervisory position over other employees, subordinate classifications, or agency-sponsored program participants.”
Based on discussions with the City and GPOA, Special Counsel suggested that Police Agent Program be renamed to “Police Agent Lead Program,” given the intent to compensate employees for the additional lead duties. Further conforming revisions were made within the Side Letter to clarify the requirements of the program.

Motorcycle Duty
Compensation related to Motorcycle Duty aligns with “Motorcycle Patrol Premium” special compensation for CalPERS as defined under CCR sections 571 and 571.1.

Motorcycle Patrol Premium is defined in CCR section 571 as follows:
“Compensation to local police officers and county peace officers who are routinely and consistently assigned to operate and/or patrol on motorcycle.” The Side Letter makes straightforward clarifications to align with the definition of Motorcycle Patrol Premium by specifying that employees are routinely and consistently assigned and operate a two-wheeled vehicle when receiving the compensation.

Administrative Assignment Program
Compensation for the Administrative Assignment Program most closely aligns with the definition of “Police Administrative Officer” special compensation CCR sections 571 and 571.1.

Police Administrative Officer is defined in CCR section 571 as follows:
“Compensation to rank and file police officers, county peace officers and school police or security officers who are routinely and consistently assigned to police administration to provide support for the police chief and command staff in the operation of the police department.”
After review, City staff determined that the compensation reported to CalPERS as Police Administrative Officer related to the Administrative Assignment Program. Current GPOA language identifies that the compensation applies to employees working schedules other than a 3/12 schedule, and CalPERS determined that this was an impermissible eligibility criterion for Police Administrative Officer compensation. Through research and discussions with GPOA, it was determined that all 3/12 assignments are non- administrative in nature, and that the only employees who receive Administrative 238 of 745

410c
6 8
9 9
Assignment Program compensation work in specific assignments that routinely perform administrative roles to support the Police Department.

As such, Special Counsel suggested revised language in the Side Letter to conform with the City’s practice. Specifically, that eligibility for Administrative Assignment Program relies on being in one of the specified roles that routinely performing administrative work, which aligns with CalPERS' definition of “Police Administrative Officer.”

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
N/A.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
This item is exempt from CEQA/NEPA requirements as it is an administrative activity.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION

1. The Council could choose not to approve the Side Letter. Failure to approve the Side Letter will fail to bring the specified special compensation into compliance for pension calculation purposes and result in adverse impact to retirees.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Paula Adams, Chief Human Resources Officer
Prepared by:

Isabel Safie, Special Counsel
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS

1. Side letter agreement between the City of Glendale and the Glendale Police Officers’ Association
239 of 745

MOTION
Moved by Council Member ____________________________, seconded by Council Member ___________________________, that the Council hereby approves the Side Letter Agreement between the City of Glendale and the Glendale Police Officers’ Association (“GPOA”) modifying language in the GPOA Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) effective July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2027 to clarify the intent of specified special compensation items as described in the Report to Council dated June 23, 2026 (“Report”), including Exhibit 1 thereto. The Side Letter Agreement is set forth in Exhibit 1 to the Report.

Vote as follows:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
240 of 745

SIDE LETTER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF GLENDALE
AND
THE GLENDALE POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION
Subject to approval by the authorized representatives of the City of Glendale and the Glendale Police Officers’ Association (collectively, “Parties”), this side letter seeks to clarify specified provisions of the July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2027 Memorandum of Understanding between the Parties (the “MOU”), solely for the purpose of complying with the Public Employees’ Retirement Law.

Section 1. Article Two (Salaries and Compensation), Section VI (Longevity Compensation), Section VII (Police Agent Program), Section X (Motorcycle Duty), and Section XVII (Administrative (Non 3/12) Assignment Program) shall be revised in their entirety to read as follows:
“VI. LONGEVITY COMPENSATION
A. Compensation
Unit employees shall receive additional monthly compensation at the rates and for the service periods as a police officer, and sworn peace officer as set forth in the table below.

1. Effective the pay period beginning August 4, 2019:
a. % of Payment Years of Sworn Service
2% of base salary At the completion of year 20

2. Effective the commencement of the pay period that includes July 1, 2020, the cumulative total percentages for Longevity Compensation shall be:
a. % of Payment Years of Sworn Service
2% of base salary At the completion of year 10
4% of base salary At the completion of year 20

3. Effective the commencement of the pay period that includes July 1, 2021, the cumulative total percentages for Longevity Compensation shall be:
a. % of Payment Years of Sworn Service
4% of base salary At the completion of year 10
8% of base salary At the completion of year 20
B.Unit employees shall be responsible for notifying the Professional Standards Bureau of their eligibility to receive longevity compensation. Compensation will be effective the commencement of the pay period in which the notification is received or the date of eligibility, whichever is the latter.”
“VII. POLICE AGENT LEAD PROGRAM
A. Purpose
The purpose of the Police Agent Program is to select and recognize those unit employees who are routinely and consistently assigned to lead other unit employees, while providing direction and training may receiveduring difficult and challenging assignments, where they and are required to work independently with a minimum of supervision. These unit employees shall provide leadership, direction and training for other unit employees. 241 of 745

B. Compensation
Unit employees assigned as Police Agents shall receive extra compensation in the amount of five percent (5%) per month above their base salary because those employees grouped based on working in challenging independent assignments are routinely and consistently assigned lead and supervisory duties over other unit employees. Compensation for Police Agents who are also receiving compensation as part of the Master Police Officer Program is subject to the limitations set forth in Article II Section XIX of this agreement. Effective the pay period which includes July 1, 2025, Police Agents shall receive extra compensation in the amount of six and one-half percent (6.5%) per month above their base salary.

C. Administration
The Police Agent Lead Program shall be administered as follows , and only those assigned to perform corresponding lead duties and shall receive the compensation:

1.Eligibility for Assignment
a. Field Services Division - Unit employees in the classification of Police Officer shall be considered for assignment as a Police Agent based on the amount of experience as a Glendale Police Officer, and whose job performance is rated " successfully meets standards" or higher.
b. Other Specialized Assignments - Unit employees in the classification of Police Officer and whose job performance successfully meets standards shall be considered by the Police Chief for assignment as a Police Agent if they possess the commensurate aptitude, skill, and expertise necessary for such assignment. Such assignments are not subject to any review committee.

2.Modification - Minimum Experience
The minimum experience necessary for either Agent assignment may be temporarily modified whenever the Police Chief determines there is an insufficient amount of candidates possessing the required expertise for specialized assignments or eligibility standards within the department from which to select. Modification recommendations may be made by either (a) The Police Chief or; (b) Agent Review Committee for approval by the Police Chief.

3.Review Committee
Field Service Division - A Police Agent Review Committee approved by the Police Chief, composed of sergeants and/or lieutenants from the Field Services Division; the Captain of the Field Services Division; and the Association President or designee shall establish selection criteria, screen, rank, and recommend candidates for this assignment. The final recommendation for appointment to the position of Police Agent shall be made by the Field Services Division Captain.

4. Authorization
The total number of Police Agent assignments authorized within the various department work sections shall be determined by the City and based on operational needs. All employees who perform the work of a police agent assignment shall be paid the lead pay.

5. Re-evaluation
Agents are appointed for a six (6) month period. Personnel desiring to be reappointed to the position of Police Agent shall submit such a request in writing. A reevaluation of the assigned Police Agents' performance shall be conducted by each Police Agent committee at every six (6) month interval.
242 of 745

6. Revocation
a. This assignment is revocable at any time by the Police Chief. If such determination is made prior to reevaluation by the Police Agent Review Committee, the officer shall be given written notification stating the reasons for the revocation of the assignment. If an employee no longer meets the requirements to be assigned, they will no longer perform the corresponding lead duties or receive the associated lead pay. b. This provision does not apply to assignments made by the Police Chief as a specialized assignment, pursuant to the aforementioned paragraph, Section C, 1 b. above.

D. Assignment

1. Responsibilities and Duties
Unit employees assigned as Police Agents shall be assigned lead responsibilities and duties as defined and recommended by the Police Agent Review Committees and approved by Police Management and the Police Chief.; While except, Police Agents are lead assignments, they are not supervisory assignments, and they will only act in a supervisory capacity at the direction of Police Management.

2. Temporary Assignments
a. Police Agent assignments are temporary assignments, not a separate job classification; it does not have Civil Service status and is not subject to Civil Service selection procedures, appeals, or seniority: it is not a property right and may be revoked by Police Management at any time for job-related reason or operational necessity.
b. Unit employees assigned to these, and other extra pay positions may be transferred in accordance with normal department practices and/or operational needs for non- disciplinary and/or non-punitive reasons; if such a transfer occurs, the unit employee shall not be entitled to an administrative appeal. It is agreed that the loss of compensation associated with the above referenced transfers/removals shall not be considered punitive nor entitle a member to receive an administrative appeal pursuant to Government Code section 3304 or White v. County of Sacramento (1976) 31 Cal.3d 676, unless the removal is imposed for disciplinary or punitive purposes.

E. Limitations

1. This extra compensation shall be paid only during those periods or portions thereof when such unit employees are actually assigned to Police Agent duty and are performing the assignment in their daily scheduled work assignment.

2. However, should a unit employee assigned to Police Agent duty be unable to perform that function due to a non-job related illness or injury for a period of twenty-one (21) calendar days, this assignment compensation shall be suspended for all scheduled workdays not worked in excess of the first twenty-one (21) calendar days and until the day he/she returns to this full duty assignment.” “X. MOTORCYCLE DUTY
A. Purpose

1. The purpose of the specialized motorcycle duty assignment is to provide the Police Department with selected qualified unit employees who are responsible for performing selected traffic enforcement, direction and control. 243 of 745

2. Unit employees selected for this assignment will be required to obtain and maintain specialized skills in addition to those of a Police Officer, which are unique to motorcycle duty.

3. Unit employees assigned to motorcycle duty must demonstrate a proficiency to operate a motorcycle as required by management.

B. Compensation

1. Unit employees in the classification of Police Officer or Police Sergeant who are routinely and consistently assigned by Police Management to a two-wheel motorcycle shall receive extra compensation in the amount five percent (5%) per month above their base salary. Effective the pay period which includes July 1, 2025, the extra compensation shall increase to six and one-half percent (6.5%) per month above their base salary.

2. This compensation is granted in recognition of operating a two-wheel motorcycle, because of the hazardous nature of the assigned duties and responsibilities of the motorcycle duty assignment.

C. Limitations

1. This extra compensation shall be paid only during those periods or portions thereof when such unit employees are actually assigned to two-wheel motorcycle duty.

2. However, should a unit employee assigned to motorcycle duty be unable to perform that function due to a non-job related illness or injury for a period of twenty-one (21) calendar days or more, this assignment compensation shall be suspended for all scheduled workdays not worked in excess of the first twenty- one (21) calendar days and until the day he/she returned to this full duty assignment.

D. Temporary Assignments
a. Motorcycle duty assignment is a temporary assignment, not a separate job classification; it does not have Civil Service status and is not subject to Civil Service selection procedures, appeals, or seniority; it is not a property right and may be revoked by Police Management at any time for job- related reasons or operational necessity.
b. Unit employees assigned to these, and other extra pay positions may be transferred in accordance with normal department practices and/or operational needs for non-disciplinary and/or non-punitive reasons; if such a transfer occurs, the unit employee shall not be entitled to an administrative appeal. It is agreed that the loss of compensation associated with the above referenced transfers/removals shall not be considered punitive nor entitle a member to receive an administrative appeal pursuant to Government Code section 3304 or White v. County of Sacramento (1976) 31 Cal.3d 676, unless the removal is imposed for disciplinary or punitive purposes.

E. Motorcycle Take Home Privilege

1. Unit employees may be allowed by Police Management to take home their 244 of 745

assigned City motorcycle, providing said following conditions are met:
a. Unit employees must reside within a sixty (60) mile radius of the Civic Center Garage.
b. Motorcycle must be kept in a secured and covered facility at the unit employee's residence.
c. Unit employee must maintain motorcycle in a clean condition. (Maintenance and cleaning is to be performed solely during work hours.) d. Unit employee is assigned to a 5/40, 9/80, 3/12, or 4/10 work schedule. e. During periods of leave exceeding forty (40) hours, Police Management may require that the motorcycle will be garaged at the Police facility for repair or deployment.
f. This privilege may be revoked at any time by Police Management if any condition is not complied with.”
“XVII. ADMINISTRATIVE (NON-3/12) ASSIGNMENT PROGRAM
A. Purpose

1. Since the majority of unit employees are assigned to and receive the benefit of the 3/12 work schedule, tThe Administrative (Non-3/12) Assignment Pay Program was established to recognize unit employees in various administrative assignments, who do not receive the benefit of the 3/12 working schedule.who are routinely and consistently assigned to police administrationadministrative roles supporting the Police Chief and police commander in operation of the police department.

2. Unit employees in the following non-3/12 work scheduleperforming duties in an administrative assignments within the following areas are eligible for compensation under the Administrative (Non-3/12) Assignment Program:
a. Investigative Services
b. Staff Services (PIO)
c. CIB Investigations
d. SIB Investigations
e. Youth Services
f. Traffic personnel excluding motor assignment
g. COPPS Program
h. Retail Crimes
i. Professional Standards
j. ASD Officer (Jail)
k. Field Services Division Admin Sergeant
l. Other non-3/12 assignments.
245 of 745

3. Unit employees receiving extra compensation for the assignments of: K-9 Officer, K-9 Vice- Narcotics, Helicopter Pilot (trainer and non-trainer), Helicopter Observer, Motorcycle Duty, Emergency Medical Technician Program, Master Police Officer Program, and Arson Investigator as set forth in Article Two, shall not be assigned to receive additional compensation under the provisions of the Administrative (Non-3/12) Assignment Program.

4. Patrol personnel temporarily assigned (on loan) to administrative non 3/12 assignments shall not be eligible to receive the Administrative Non-3/12 Assignment Pay unless the temporary assignment extends beyond thirty (30) days.

B. Compensation
Unit employees designated by Police Management to assignments under the Administrative (Non- 3/12) Assignment Program, shall receive extra compensation in the amount of five percent (5%) per month above their monthly base salary because they are routinely and consistently assigned to police administration supporting the Police Chief and police commander in operation of the police department. Effective the pay period which includes July 1, 2025, the extra compensation shall increase to six and one-half percent (6.5%) per month above their base salary.

C. Limitations

1. This extra compensation shall be paid only during those periods or portions thereof when such unit employees are actually assigned to the Administrative (Non-3/12) Assignment Program.

2. However, should a unit employee assigned to the Administrative (Non-3/12) Assignment Program be unable to perform that function due to a non-job related illness or injury for a period of fifteen (15) working days or more, this assignment compensation shall be suspended for all scheduled work days not worked in excess of the first fifteen (15) working days and until the day he/she returns to this full duty assignment.

D. Temporary Assignment

1. The Administrative (Non-3/12) Assignment is a temporary assignment, not a separate job classification; it does not have Civil Service status and is not subject to Civil Service selection procedures, appeals, or seniority; it is not a property right and may be revoked by Police Management at any time for job-related reasons or operational necessity.

2. Unit employees assigned to these, and other extra pay positions may be transferred in accordance with normal department practices and/or operational needs for non-disciplinary and/or non-punitive reasons; if such a transfer occurs, the unit employee shall not be entitled to an administrative appeal. It is agreed that the loss of compensation associated with the above referenced transfers/removals shall not be considered punitive nor entitle a member to receive an administrative appeal pursuant to Government Code section 3304 or White v.

County of Sacramento (1976) 31 Cal.3d 676, unless the removal is imposed for disciplinary or punitive purposes.

E. Restriction During Administrative Assignment
Any unit employee not regularly assigned to the Administrative Non-3/12 AssignmentPay, but is placed on a non-3/12an administrative schedule because of an administrative assignment to the Professional Standards Bureau or a Temporary Modified Assignment shall not be eligible to receive the Administrative Non-3/12 PayAssignment Pay, because they are not regularly assigned.”

246 of 745

Section 2. Except as expressly modified by this side letter, the provisions of the MOU, as modified by earlier side letters, shall remain unchanged. Upon expiration of the current MOU, the terms of this Side Letter will be incorporated into the successor MOU.

This side letter is hereby executed by the authorized representatives of the Parties on the date specified.

PARTIES TO THE AGREEMENT:

FOR THE CITY OF GLENDALE
__________________________________ ____________________ Roubik Golanian, City Manager Date
__________________________________ ____________________ Paula Adams, Chief Human Resources Officer Date
FOR THE GLENDALE POLICE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION
__________________________________ ____________________ Michael Wenz, GPOA President Date

APPROVED AS TO FORM
__________________________________ ____________________ Isabel Safie, Special Counsel Date
247 of 745

10d

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: Adoption of the City’s FY 2026-27 Gann Appropriations Limit

1. Resolution Adopting FY 2026-27 Gann Appropriations Limit

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for June 23, 2026 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Gann Initiative established constitutional limits on the amount of tax revenue that may be appropriated by California governmental agencies in a given fiscal year. This limit is initially calculated using actual appropriations from a base year and then adjusted annually using a growth factor that takes into account changes in population and the cost of living. Based on staff’s calculation, the FY 2026-27 Appropriations Limit for the City of Glendale is $429,910,298 and the proposed appropriation subject to the Gann Initiative spending limit is $279,038,594. Therefore, the City’s Proposed FY 2026-27 Budget is in compliance with State of California spending limits as established in article XIIIB of the California Constitution. 248 of 745

210d
5 1
9 7

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve the attached resolution adopting the City’s FY 2026-27 Gann Appropriations Limit.

ANALYSIS
On November 6, 1979, California voters passed Proposition 4, commonly referred to as the “Gann Initiative”. The Gann Initiative established constitutional limits on the amount of tax revenue that may be appropriated by California governmental agencies in a given fiscal year. This limit is initially calculated using actual appropriations from a base year and then adjusted annually using a growth factor that takes into account changes in population and the cost of living. Statutes clarifying the provisions of the Gann Initiative are now codified in article XIIIB of the California Constitution, which provides the formula for calculating local government spending limits. In addition to Article XIIIB, the Revenue and Taxation Code, Section 7910, requires each local governmental unit to establish its appropriations limit by the beginning of each fiscal year.

In June 1989, California voters passed Proposition 111, which further improved procedural transparency for local governments setting annual appropriations limits.

Among other things, Proposition 111 revised the base year used in calculating the Gann Appropriations Limit from 1979 to 1987 and simplified the formula used for calculating annual adjustments.

Each year, local governments must adjust their Appropriations Limit using two variables:
the change in the cost of living and the change in population. California state law allows a public entity to choose among different methods for calculating these two variables. A local government that is not a school or a college district may choose to define the change in the cost of living in either of two ways: (1) the change in California’s per capita personal income, or (2) the change in the jurisdiction’s local assessment roll from the preceding year that is due to the addition of local non- residential new construction.

Local governments also have two options for defining the change in population:
(1) the percentage change in population within the City, or (2) the percentage change in population within the county where the city is located. To ensure consistency and accuracy among jurisdictions, the Department of Finance is required to post an annual newsletter by May 1st that provides the percentage change in California’s per capita personal income as well as data on population change for each city in the State. The City of Glendale utilizes this newsletter in computing its annual Appropriations Limit.

In calculating the City of Glendale’s FY 2026-27 Gann Appropriations Limit, staff analyzed the four alternative methods for calculating the appropriations limit and elected to use the method that resulted in the most conservative appropriations limit. Based on this analysis, staff have elected to define the change in the cost of living as the change in the City’s local assessment growth and to define the change in population as the percentage change in population within the County. The year-over-year change in City’s local assessment growth has been 3.08% and the change in the County’s population has been a decrease of 0.64%. These percentages are each converted to ratios using a 249 of 745

310d
5 1
9 7
state-mandated formula and then multiplied together to obtain an appropriations increase factor. The increase factor for FY 2026-27 is 1.0242. The Appropriations Limit for the upcoming year is finally calculated by multiplying this factor by the Appropriations Limit of the prior fiscal year.

Based on staff’s calculation, the FY 2026-27 Appropriations Limit for the City of Glendale is $429,910,298. The City’s total proposed appropriation subject to the Gann Initiative spending limit (i.e., proceeds from taxes less state mandated exclusions) is $279,038,594. Therefore, the City’s Proposed FY 2026-27 Budget is in compliance with State of California spending limits as established in article XIIIB of the California Constitution. The attached resolution will authorize the new Appropriations Limit for next fiscal year as required by the California Constitution and applicable State Law.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
This item is considered a ministerial activity and therefore, not subject to CEQA review.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Jack Liang, Director of Finance
Prepared by:

Linda Moosaian, Revenue Manager
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit 1: City of Glendale – Gann Appropriations Limit – FY 2026-27 Proposed Budget 250 of 745

RESOLUTION NO.___________

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE

ADOPTING APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE CITY OF GLENDALE
WHEREAS, California State law requires the adopting of an annual appropriations limit for the City of Glendale; and
WHEREAS, the Finance Department has calculated the appropriations limit for the Fiscal Year 2026-27 and in doing so has elected to use the change in the County of Los Angeles population and the change in City of Glendale’s local assessment growth; and WHEREAS, the Finance Department will retain these working papers on file for a period of fifteen (15) days as required under the law;

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE THAT THE COUNCIL does hereby adopt the appropriations limit for the Fiscal Year 2026-27 of $429,910,298.

Adopted this ________ day of June, 2026.
_____________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS

CITY OF GLENDALE )
I, Suzie Abajian, City Clerk of the City of Glendale, certify that the foregoing Resolution No. _______was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the _________ day of June 2026, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
____________________________
City Clerk
251 of 745

Exhibit 1
419,752,293$
* Alternative 1 - City Election
Calculation of Increase Factor for FY 2026-27:

County Population Growth : -0.64%
City Local Assessment Growth (non-residential) : 3.08%
Increase Factor for FY 2026-27 [(-0.64 + 100)/100] * [(3.08+100)/100] : 1.0242 429,910,298$
279,038,594$
(proceeds of taxes less state mandated exclusions)
Total Under/(Over): 150,871,704$
Alternative 2
Calculation of Increase Factor for FY 2026-27:

City Population Growth : -0.27%
City Local Assessment Growth (non-residential) : 3.08%
Increase Factor for FY 2026-27 [(-0.27 + 100)/100] * [(3.08+100)/100] : 1.0280 431,505,357$
279,038,594$
(proceeds of taxes less state mandated exclusions)
Total Under/(Over): 152,466,763$
Alternative 3
Calculation of Increase Factor for FY 2026-27:

County Population Growth : -0.64%
Per Capita Income Growth : 4.95%
Increase Factor for FY 2026-27 [(-0.64 + 100)/100] * [(4.95+100)/100] : 1.0428 437,717,691$
279,038,594$
(proceeds of taxes less state mandated exclusions)
Total Under/(Over): 158,679,097$
Alternative 4
Calculation of Increase Factor for FY 2026-27:

City Population Growth : -0.27%
Per Capita Income Growth : 4.95%
Increase Factor for FY 2026-27 [(-0.27 + 100)/100] * [(4.95+100)/100] : 1.0467 439,354,725$
279,038,594$
(proceeds of taxes less state mandated exclusions)
Total Under/(Over): 160,316,131$
Fiscal Year 2026-27 Appropriations Subject to Limitation:

CITY OF GLENDALE

GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
FY 2026-27 PROPOSED BUDGET
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Appropriations Limit:

Fiscal Year 2026-27 Appropriations Limit:

Fiscal Year 2026-27 Appropriations Subject to Limitation:

Fiscal Year 2026-27 Appropriations Limit:

Fiscal Year 2026-27 Appropriations Subject to Limitation:

Fiscal Year 2026-27 Appropriations Limit:

Fiscal Year 2026-27 Appropriations Subject to Limitation:
252 of 745

10e
26-90201

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: FY 2025-26 Glendale Water and Power Transfer

1. Resolution Reducing the Percentage of Operating Revenues to be Transferred from Glendale Water and Power (Electric) to the General Reserve Fund for Fiscal Year 2025-26

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Action Item
Approved for June 23, 2026 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City Charter, Section 22, Article XI, requires the transfer of 25% of the department of Glendale Water and Power’s annual operating electric revenues to the General Reserve Fund unless a lower percentage transfer is approved by the City Council. The City has historically transferred an amount less than 25% by adopting a resolution setting a lower amount. For FY 2025-26, the estimated amount to be transferred out of Glendale Water and Power Electric Surplus Fund is $32,597,286, or 10.8% of the Electric Works estimated Operating Revenue.
253 of 745

10e2
26-90201
6 8
9 3

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve the attached Resolution reducing the percentage of operating revenues to be transferred from Glendale Water and Power (Electric) to the General Reserve Fund for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

ANALYSIS
The attached resolution, as required by the Charter, provides for the annually budgeted transfer of the operating revenue from the Glendale Water and Power Electric Surplus Fund to the General Reserve Fund for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2026. For FY 2025-26, the estimated amount to be transferred out of Glendale Water and Power Electric Surplus Fund is $32,597,286, or 10.8% of the Electric Works estimated Operating Revenue.

The attached resolution authorizes this transfer from the Electric Works Revenue Fund to the Glendale Water and Power Electric Surplus Fund, transferred from the Glendale Water and Power Electric Surplus Fund to the General Reserve Fund, and further for the transfer from the General Reserve Fund to the General Budget Fund provided the total balance in the General Reserve Fund before this transfer exceeds fifty percent (50%) of the total amount of the anticipated ad valorem tax receipts for Fiscal Year 2025-26 as required by the City Charter.

While we estimate the FY 2025-26 transfer to represent 10.8% of the annual electric works operating revenue received, the actual amount transferred may differ based on the actual operating revenues received by June 30, 2026. It should be noted that the transfer of the operating water revenues to the General Reserve Fund was terminated beginning 2011.

STAKEHOLDERS/OUTREACH
Not Applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Glendale Water & Power Electric Surplus Fund 10.8% Transfer to the General Reserve Fund (Estimated $32,597,286) was approved as a part of the FY 2025-26 budget. The funding is outlined below:

Existing Appropriation
Amount Account String Funding Source
$32,597,286 GL: 48010-5820-GWP-4505-P0000- Electric Works Revenue Fund
Department Cost Center Program
Glendale Water
and Power
GWP Administration

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (CEQA/NEPA)
254 of 745

10e3
26-90201
6 8
9 3
This item is considered a ministerial activity and therefore, not subject to CEQA review.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
This item is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.

ALTERNATIVES TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1: The City Council can decline to approve the Resolution reducing the percentage of operating revenues to be transferred from Glendale Water and Power (Electric) to the General Reserve Fund for Fiscal Year 2025-26. Doing so will have an adverse negative financial impact in the General Fund and the services the City provides.

Alternative 2: The City Council may consider any other alternative not proposed by staff.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Submitted by:

Jack Liang, Director of Finance
Prepared by:

Adrine Gdakian, Budget Analyst
Approved by:

Roubik R. Golanian, P.E., City Manager

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS
Not Applicable.
255 of 745

RESOLUTION NO. ___________

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REDUCING THE PERCENTAGE OF OPERATING REVENUE OF THE GLENDALE

WATER AND POWER DEPARTMENT TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM GLENDALE

WATER AND POWER (ELECTRIC) TO THE GENERAL RESERVE FUND
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:

WHEREAS, Section 22, Article XI of the City Charter provides that at the end of each fiscal year an amount equal to twenty-five percent (25%) of the operating revenue of the Glendale Water and Power Department for each year, hereinafter referred to as "revenue", excluding receipts from water or power supplied to other cities or utilities at the wholesale rates, shall be transferred from the Glendale Water and Power Surplus Fund to the General Reserve Fund; provided that the Council may annually, at or before the time for adopting the General Budget for the ensuing fiscal year, reduce said amount or wholly waive such transfer, if, in its opinion, such reduction or waiver is necessary to insure the sound financial position of said Glendale Water and Power Department, and it shall so declare by resolution; and
WHEREAS, prior to the time for adopting the General Budget for the Fiscal Year 2025-26, the Council has considered the matter and determined that the transfer should again be suspended for the Water Works Enterprise and decided that it should be reduced to (an estimated $32,597,286) of said revenue for the Electric Works Enterprise and that such reduction is necessary to insure the sound financial position of the Glendale Water and Power Department.

WHEREAS, Section 15, Article XI of the City Charter provides that in any fiscal year in which the total balance in the General Reserve Fund exceeds fifty percent (50%) of the total amount of the anticipated ad valorem tax receipts for that year, the Council may appropriate such excess for any City purpose without returning the same to the General Reserve Fund.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE:

1. The amount of operating revenue to be transferred from Glendale Water and Power Surplus Fund for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 shall be continued to be suspended of said Water Works, and that such suspension is necessary to insure the sound financial position of the Glendale Water and Power Department.

2. Ten and eight tenths percent (10.8%) of Electric Works operating revenue for the 2025-26 Fiscal Year (estimated at $32,597,286) shall be transferred from the Electric Works Revenue Fund to the Glendale Water and Power Surplus Fund and further transferred to the General Reserve Fund for Fiscal Year 2025-26, and that such reduction from 25% to 10.8% of operating revenues is necessary to insure the sound financial position of the Glendale Water and Power Department.
256 of 745

3. If the total balance in the General Reserve Fund prior to said transfer of Electric Works operating revenue exceeds fifty percent (50%) of the total amount of the anticipated ad valorem tax receipts for Fiscal Year 2025-26, then the amount so transferred to the General Reserve Fund pursuant to Section 2 above shall be transferred from the General Reserve Fund to the General Budget Fund.

Adopted this ________ day of June, 2026.
_______________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS

CITY OF GLENDALE)
I, Suzie Abajian, Ph.D., City Clerk of the City of Glendale, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No._________ was adopted by the Council of the City of Glendale, California, at a regular meeting held on the__________ day of June, 2026 by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Absent:

Abstain:
________________________________
City Clerk
257 of 745

11a

CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM
Report: FY 2026-27 Citywide Budget Hearing and Adoption 1) Hold a Public Hearing on the FY 2026-27 Proposed Citywide Budget and Changes to the Citywide Fee Schedule
2) Resolution Adopting the FY 2026-27 City of Glendale Budget 3) Resolution Establishing New Fees, and Increasing, Decreasing, Modifying Certain Existing Fees for Various Services Provided by the City and Adopting Changes to the Citywide Fee Schedule for FY 2026-27
4) Resolution Establishing New Fees, and Increasing, Decreasing, Modifying Certain Existing Fees in the Comprehensive Citywide Fee Schedule for FY 2026-27 for Community Development Services, Permits, and Certificates 5) Resolution of Appropriation Shifting $60,000,000 from Undesignated Fund Balance, Section 115 Trust Fund (25300-1080) to Cash Restricted – Section 115 Trust, Section 115 Trust Fund (10115-1080) for Deposit into the Pension Rate Stabilization Program Trust Fund Account
6) Resolution Providing for the Establishment of Classification Titles and Compensation for Employees of the City of Glendale Covered by the Glendale Management Association Memorandum of Understanding, Including Employee Relations Exempt Classifications
7) Resolution Providing for the Establishment of Classification Titles and Compensation for Employees of the City of Glendale Represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 18 8) Resolution Providing for the Establishment of Classification Titles and Compensation for Employees of the City of Glendale Covered by the Glendale City Employees’ Association Memorandum of Understanding, Including Confidential and Hourly Classifications
9) Resolution Providing for the Establishment of Classification Titles and Compensation for Employees of the City of Glendale Covered by the Glendale Fire Fighters’ Association Memorandum of Understanding
10)Resolution Providing for the Establishment of Classification Titles and Compensation for Executive Level Employees of the City of Glendale 258 of 745

211a
6 8
9 4
11)Resolution Approving and Adopting Side Letter Agreements to the Memoranda of Understanding Between the City of Glendale and Various Bargaining Units Regarding Compensation, Classification Updates, and Administrative Corrections

COUNCIL ACTION
Item Type: Public Hearing
Approved for June 23, 2026 calendar

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City Charter requires an annual public hearing and adoption of the City’s budget for the upcoming year. The FY 2026-27 proposed budget reflects the input received from City Council, as identified during the four study sessions held between April 30 and June 4, 2026. The following proposed Fiscal Year 2026-27 annual budget is presented to City Council for adoption.

The total appropriation proposed for FY 2026-27 citywide budget is $1.29 billion, of which $377.9 million is in the General Fund. Based on the FY 2026-27 proposed revenues and appropriations, the General Fund shows an initial $14.2 million deficit.

Factoring in an anticipated budget utilization rate of 96.9%, actual expenditures are projected at $366.1 million, reducing the expected deficit and corresponding use of fund balance to $2.4 million. This results in a projected General Fund reserve of 36.9% of the FY 2026-27 proposed budget. The City Council’s current General Fund Reserve policy is a minimum of 25% of the annual operating budget and a target of 35%. The projected General Fund reserve is expected to remain above target at the end of FY 2026-27.

The City completed a partial user fee study which included Library, Arts & Culture and Community Development. Glendale Water & Power, Police, and Fire requested fee increases to full cost recovery or to create new fees for existing or new services.

Additionally, Community Development is proposing to add Administrative Citations to the fee schedule, and increase the fee for existing citations. The results and recommendations for adoption of the amendments to the Citywide Fee Schedule are presented.

As a part of the FY 2026-27 proposed budget, staff is requesting approval to deposit $60 million into the Pension Rate Stabilization Program Trust Fund account.

As a part of its ongoing effort to ensure an effective and equitable organizational structure, City departments periodically review job classifications, titles, and compensation levels. These reviews address evolving operational needs, market conditions, recruitment and retention challenges, and equity considerations. Staff is proposing six resolutions to revise and establish new classifications, and to delete obsolete classifications, as detailed in this report.
259 of 745

311a
6 8
9 4

RECOMMENDATION
To hold a public hearing and adopt the FY 2026-27 Proposed Citywide Budget and changes to the Citywide Fee Schedule. To approve a Resolution of Appropriation for FY 2026-27 to deposit $60 million into the Pension Rate Stabilization Program Trust Fund account. Lastly, to adopt resolutions to revise and establish new classifications, and to delete obsolete classifications, as detailed in this report.

ANALYSIS
FY 2026-27 PROPOSED CITYWIDE BUDGET
The total proposed appropriation for FY 2026-27 citywide budget is $1.29 billion. A summary of revenue estimates and appropriations for all funds can be found in Exhibits 1 and 2 respectively. The following table is a summary of citywide appropriations by fund type as adopted for FY 2025-26 and as proposed for FY 2026-27.

GENERAL FUND
The General Fund provides the majority of ongoing governmental services that are not funded through restricted special revenue funds. These services include Fire, Police, Community Development, Community Services and Parks, Library, Arts & Culture, Public Works, and central support service departments that include City Attorney, City Clerk, City Treasurer, Finance, Human Resources, and Management Services. The General Fund is supported by general taxes including property, sales, utility users, and other taxes, in addition to various fees and a transfer from Electric operating revenue funds.

During the FY 2025-26 budget study sessions, the FY 2026-27 ending fund balance was estimated to decrease by approximately $31.7 million. This significant anticipated budget deficit was driven by a slowdown in revenue growth combined with rapidly rising costs required to maintain City services. Without corrective action, cost increases are expected to continue outpacing revenue growth, resulting in a structural imbalance.

In response, over the past nine months the City Manager’s Office and all department leaders have worked collaboratively to identify and develop solutions to narrow the Fund Type
Adopted
FY 2025-26
Proposed
FY 2026-27
Increase/
(Decrease)
%
Change
General Fund $ 352,480,496 $ 377,866,580 $ 25,386,084 7.2% Section 115 Trust Fund - 5,000,000 5,000,000 N/A
Special Revenue Funds 139,708,616 150,506,279 10,797,663 7.7% Debt Service Funds 2,998,700 3,000,250 1,550 0.1%
Capital Projects Funds 20,966,367 73,133,000 52,166,633 248.8% Enterprise Funds 556,834,669 533,726,256 (23,108,413) (4.1%) Internal Service Funds 163,276,020 145,183,264 (18,092,756) (11.1%) Citywide Total $ 1,236,264,868 $1,288,415,629 $ 52,150,761 4.2% 260 of 745

411a
6 8
9 4
General Fund funding gap. These efforts focused on both revenue enhancement opportunities and cost-reduction strategies.

To strengthen the City’s ongoing revenue base, staff has identified several recurring revenue enhancements totaling $10.6 million. These measures include increases to parking fees, higher emergency medical response fees, and adjustments to code enforcement and vegetation management fees. The City will also expand efforts to collect Occupancy Tax from home-sharing hosts.

Additionally, the City has assigned a valuation to landfill gas used by Glendale Water & Power for energy generation and plans to allow installation of digital kiosks in the public right-of-way. The Nonprofit Subsidy Program will also be eliminated as part of these ongoing revenue measures.

One-time revenue enhancements will further support closing the budget gap, most notably through the sale of an underutilized City-owned property, which will generate one-time revenue.

On the expenditure side, departments were directed to implement 5% recurring cost reductions over two years, with a target of 3% in FY 2026-27 and an additional 2% in FY 2027-28. For FY 2026-27, these reductions will result in a reduction of vacant positions, reduced temporary staffing in multiple departments, citywide reductions in contracted services and software technology, delayed replacement of a fire apparatus, elimination of the Police Department’s contribution to the Joint Air Support Fund, and modified service hours at select library branches.

The City also reviewed and further decreased internal service fund rates for liability and workers’ compensation insurance.

One-time cost reduction measures include evaluating and reprioritizing capital improvement projects to focus on those providing the greatest community benefit, as well as initiating earlier withdrawals from the Section 115 Pension Trust to help offset pension cost pressures. Altogether, these cost-reduction measures total $17.0 million.

All these measures have been incorporated into the proposed FY 2026-27 budget and the General Fund five-year forecast. Together, they represent feasible short-term actions that meaningfully narrow the General Fund’s funding gap—from $31.7 million to a projected $2.4 million deficit—while also strengthening the City’s long-term fiscal sustainability.
261 of 745

411a
6 8
9 4
262 of 745

511a
6 8
9 4
Resources
The following table reflects the General Fund revenue estimates for FY 2025-26 and FY 2026-27 by major category.

General Fund Revenues
Revenue changes for the proposed FY 2026-27 budget are described in detail below. Property Tax: This category is estimated to generate approximately $92.4 million, reflecting a 5.1% increase compared to the previous year. The City continues to experience modest growth in its property tax revenues; however, home sales and prices have flattened due to persistently high interest rates and a shortage of housing supply. Broader economic uncertainties, including geopolitical tensions and a potential for higher inflation, may further constrain the pace of price growth.

The City’s assessed valuation growth has been trending downward. In FY 2025-26, the City’s taxable property value increased by 3.7%, compared to

5.4% in FY 2022-23. This slowing growth rate limits the projected property tax revenue.
Sales Tax: This category is projected to generate approximately $86.4 million, reflecting a 0.4% decline compared to the prior year. This decline is largely due to continued reduced sales in the auto and transportation category, an area of significant reliance for the City; loss in business and industry; partially offset by increases in several apparel retailers.
Utility Users Tax (UUT): This category is estimated to generate approximately $35.0 million, reflecting a 2.3% increase compared to the prior year. This increase is mainly attributable to the increase in the electric service rates.

Category
Adopted
FY 2025-26
Proposed
FY 2026-27 Variance
%
Change
Property Taxes $ 87,928,057 $ 92,379,752 $ 4,451,695 5.1% Sales Taxes 86,775,063 86,439,475 (335,588) (0.4%)
Utility Users Taxes 34,244,506 35,048,593 804,087 2.3%
Occupancy Taxes 11,497,675 11,837,605 339,930 3.0%
Licenses & Permits 9,444,504 11,794,000 2,349,496 24.9% Revenue from Other Agencies 460,000 418,665 (41,335) (9.0%) Charges for Services 43,040,519 51,055,702 8,015,183 18.6% Interfund Revenue 19,861,374 18,310,864 (1,550,510) (7.8%) Fines and Forfeitures 7,470,000 7,350,000 (120,000) (1.6%) Interest/Use of Money 3,435,941 4,770,705 1,334,764 38.8% Misc. & Non-Operating 1,146,300 1,227,800 81,500 7.1%
Transfers From Other Funds 41,570,653 43,066,480 1,495,827 3.6% Total Revenues $ 346,874,592 $ 363,699,641 $ 16,825,049 4.9% Budgeted Resources from Fund Balance 5,605,904 14,166,939 8,561,035 152.7% Total Resources $ 352,480,496 $ 377,866,580 $ 25,386,084 7.2% 263 of 745

611a
6 8
9 4
Occupancy Taxes: This category is estimated to generate $11.8 million, which is a 3.0% increase from the FY 2025-26 estimate. The increase stems from the opening of a new hotel and stricter enforcement of Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) on home-sharing, despite a decrease in recreational international travel, due to political and fiscal uncertainty.
Licenses & Permits: Th is category is estimated to be approximately $11.8 million, reflecting an increase of 24.9% from the FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget. The increase is primarily driven by higher fees resulting from the fee study, as well as the anticipated issuance of building and planning permits for several large projects.
Revenue from Other Agencies: This category is estimated to be approximately $419 thousand, reflecting a modest decrease of 9.0% from the FY 2025-26 estimate. The projected decrease is primarily due to a reduction in the funds received from the State of California Penalty Fund.
Charges for Services: This category is estimated to be approximately $51.1 million, reflecting an 18.6% increase from the FY 2025-26 revenue estimate. This increase is primarily attributable to several revenue enhancement measures, including $3.2 million from emergency medical response fees, $1.2 million from increased parking fees, $1.1 million from higher vegetation management fees, and $500 thousand for increased code enforcement revenue from Community Development. Additional revenue includes $954 thousand from new concierge and express plan check fees and $300 thousand from the implementation of a digital kiosk revenue initiative. Interfund Revenue: This category is estimated to be approximately $18.3 million, reflecting a decrease of 7.8% from the FY 2025-26 estimate. The projected decrease is primarily due to a reduction in the safety allocation. Fines and Forfeitures: This category is estimated to be approximately $7.4 million, reflecting a decrease of 1.6% from the FY 2025-26 estimate.

The projected decrease is from decreased parking tickets offset by the implementation of the new Speed Safety Program.
Interest/Use of Money: This category is estimated to be approximately $4.8 million, reflecting an increase of 38.8% from the FY 2025-26 estimate. The projected increase is driven by a higher rate of return and growth in the principal balance.
Misc. & Non-Operating: This category is estimated to be approximately $1.2 million for FY 2026-27, reflecting a 7.1% increase compared to prior year.

The increase is primarily due to the elimination of the Nonprofit Subsidy Program. 264 of 745

711a
6 8
9 4
Transfers from Other Funds: This category is estimated to be approximately $43.1 million for FY 2026-27, reflecting an increase of 3.6% compared to the prior year. This includes a decrease in the Electric Works Revenue fund transfer of $946 thousand, which returns to 10.0% of total electric operating revenues after a one-time increase to 10.8% in FY 2025-26, as well as a one-time decrease resulting from prior year’s one-time transfer back from the Capital Improvement Fund of $9.0 million from defunded projects dropping off. Additional transfers include a $4.0 million reimbursement from the Central Park project funding as the project has secured other funding sources; $2.4 million Transfer of Property revenue from the sale of an underutilized property to Glendale Water & Power; and a $5.0 million withdrawal from the Section 115 Pension Trust.

Appropriations
The following table shows the appropriations for the General Fund for FY 2025-26 and FY 2026-27 by category.

General Fund Appropriations
Category
Adopted
FY 2025-26
Proposed
FY 2026-27
Increase/
(Decrease)
%
Change
Salaries & Benefits $ 260,476,358 $ 275,093,470 $ 14,617,112 5.6% Maintenance & Operation 90,130,655 93,512,025 3,381,370 3.8% Capital Outlay 240,500 329,920 89,420 37.2%
Transfers Out to Other Funds 1,632,983 8,931,165 7,298,182 446.9% Total Appropriations $ 352,480,496 $ 377,866,580 $ 25,386,084 7.2% Budget Utilization Rate
Based on Forecast 96.9%
Expenditures Based on Forecast $ 366,093,262
Change in Fund Balance
Based on Forecast $ (2,393,621)
The General Fund budget is forecasted to increase by approximately $25.4 million, or

7.2% compared to the Adopted FY 2025-26 budget. This increase is mainly attributable to the following:
Salaries & Benefits: Salaries and Benefits increased by $14.6 million, or 5.6% compared to the FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget. This increase is primarily driven by cost-of-living adjustments (COLA) to salaries, normal step progressions, the addition of positions required for mandated or revenue-generating services, and higher Public Employee Retirement System (PERS) costs. It also reflects the addition of two Project Manager positions approved by City Council during budget study session 4 as part of the Pavement Management Program. The overall increase is partially offset by the defunding of five vacant positions, reductions in hourly wages, and lower benefit rates. In addition, the soft hiring freeze implemented in FY 2025-26 remains in effect. A total of 21 frozen positions remain defunded and may only be restored if new funding sources are 265 of 745

811a
6 8
9 4
identified. PERS costs, budgeted at $67.9 million for FY 2026-27, continue to be the second-largest cost driver in this category. Both the Employer Normal Contribution Rate and the Unfunded Accrued Liability (UAL) are projected to rise until an anticipated peak between 2030 and 2033. To mitigate the impact of these increases, the City will begin withdrawing from the Section 115 Pension Trust in FY 2026-27 to offset a portion of the annual employer payment.
Maintenance & Operation: Maintenance and Operation increased by $3.4 million, or 3.8%, compared to the FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget. The increase is primarily driven by operational needs, including a $1.4 million increase in the Fire Department for the Public Provider Ground Emergency Medical Transport (PP-GEMT) payments, which is fully offset by additional emergency medical response fee revenue. The Police Department also reflects $1.8 million increase for its in-car video system and body-worn cameras contract, which was previously budgeted in the Information Technology Department. In addition, Council approved a $1.0 million increase for the street trees planting and maintenance contract under Public Works. Other non-discretionary increases include a $918 thousand increase in the fleet equipment rental charge and a $1.6 million increase in the building maintenance service charge.

These increases are partially offset by reductions across various departments and the elimination of the Police Department’s contribution to the Joint Air Support Fund, consistent with the General Fund’s 3.0% cost-reduction target. Capital Outlay: Capital Outlay increased by $89 thousand due to a cyclical rise in the Fire Department equipment scheduled for replacement, including defibrillators and turnout gear in FY 2026-27.
Transfers Out to Other Funds: Transfers Out to Other Funds increased by $7.3 million compared to the FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget. This increase is primarily due to the restoration of General Fund transfers to both the Capital Improvement Fund ($4.6 million) and the Fleet Management Fund for vehicle purchases ($2.7 million) after these transfers were suspended in FY 2025-26 as part of budget balancing strategies.
266 of 745

911a
6 8
9 4
General Fund
Projected Ending Fund Balance & Reserve Percentage, June 30, 2026 (In Millions)
Based on the FY 2026-27 proposed revenues and appropriations, and incorporating a budget utilization rate of 96.9%, the General Fund budget is projected to have a deficit of $2.4 million and a reserve of 36.9% of the FY 2026-27 proposed budget. The City Council’s current General Fund Reserve policy is a minimum of 25% of the annual operating budget, with a target of 35%.

Projected FY 2025-26 Ending Reserve $ 141.6
Projected Resources $ 363.7
Projected Expenditures 366.1
Surplus/(Deficit) (2.4)
Projected FY 2026-27 Ending Reserve $ 139.2
Reserve % 36.9%

OTHER FUNDS
Special Revenue Funds
The approximately $10.8 million increase in the Special Revenue Funds is primarily due to the following:
CDBG Fund 2010 – The decrease of approximately $44 thousand is mainly due to lower federal grant award revenue compared to the prior year, resulting in decreases in miscellaneous maintenance and operation costs. The increase in direct assistance to community agencies was partially offset by a reduction in City CIP projects.
Housing Assistance Fund 2020 – The net increase of approximately $232 thousand in this fund is due to multiple factors. There are increases of $2.5 million for the regular Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) vouchers, and $1.7 million for the portable HAP vouchers, due to a growing number of participants porting their vouchers from other public housing agencies to the Glendale Housing Authority. This is offset by a decrease of approximately $4.5 million in direct assistance due to the ending of the Emergency Housing Voucher (EHV) program. Additionally, there were increases in personnel costs and contractual services.
Home Grant Fund 2030 – The net decrease of approximately $303 thousand is attributed to lower federal grant award, which resulted in a decrease in direct assistance. However, this budget does not include funding for the Tenant-Based 267 of 745

1011a
6 8
9 4
Rental Assistance Program, which has been proposed as an alternative for the sunsetting EHV program. Approval of this program is currently pending determination from the Department of Housing of Urban Development (HUD) and will use available fund balance that has not yet been appropriated. Once a final determination is received, staff will return to City Council to appropriate direct assistance funding for this program within the Home Grant Fund.
Continuum of Care Grant Fund 2040 – There is an increase of approximately $3.4 million in appropriation compared to the FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget. This includes $2.9 million in direct assistance, and $443 thousand in program administration. In previous years, due to the timing of the award and the start date of programs not aligning with the start of the fiscal year, the grant was appropriated mid-year via Council Resolution, with funds carried over into the new fiscal year. Beginning FY 2026-27, however, the department applied for and received a no-cost extension that shifted all project start dates to July 1, aligning the grant cycle with the fiscal year and eliminating the need for mid-year appropriation via Council Resolution. The FY 2026-27 award reflects a slight increase over the prior award, primarily due to fair market rent adjustments. Emergency Solutions Grant Fund 2050 – The decrease of approximately $419 thousand is due to a one-time special allocation of emergency solutions grant funds received in the previous year.
Workforce Fund 2060 – The net decrease of approximately $3.8 million is primarily due to decreases in state and county funding allocations, as well as a decrease of $2.0 million of a one-time grant received in the prior year. This is reflected by decreases in hourly wages and direct assistance. Affordable Housing Trust Fund 2090 – The increase of approximately $8 thousand is in personnel costs.
Glendale Youth Alliance Fund 2110 – The net increase of approximately $52 thousand is attributable to higher personnel costs, partially offset by a salary charge-out resulting from staff charging out to a grant project that will carry over into FY 2026-27 and is budgeted in the Grant Fund.
BEGIN Homeownership Fund 2120 – The increase of $1 thousand is due to an increase in interest income applied towards direct assistance. Low & Mod Income Housing Asset Fund 2130 – The net increase of approximately $113 thousand is primarily due to increases in administration costs such as personnel costs and contractual services.
Grant Fund 2160 – The increase of approximately $128 thousand is due to an increase in grant revenue and increased project appropriation. 268 of 745

1111a
6 8
9 4
Hazardous Disposal Fund 2190 – The increase of approximately $232 thousand is primarily due to increases in personnel costs, cost allocation charge, contractual services, and training.
Measure M Local Return Fund 2220 – The decrease of approximately $570 thousand is due to a decrease in subsidy expense to the Transit Utility Fund, partially offset by an increase in contractual services. Measure H Fund 2240 – The increase of $300 thousand is due to increased estimated county Measure H sales tax revenue, applied towards direct assistance.
Measure W Fund 2260 – The net increase of approximately $3.0 million is primarily due to increases in capital projects, contractual services, and personnel costs. Project appropriation this year includes CIP to Capture & Treat Stormwater, and a new project for California Ave and Adjacent Storm Water Capture.
Measure A Homeless Services 2291 – The increase of approximately $467 thousand compared to the previous year is primarily due to the timing of appropriating the award as part of the adopted budget, instead of mid-year via Council Resolution. The full award amount is allocated towards direct assistance, with a small portion to be used for associated administration costs. Air Quality Improvement Fund 2510 – The decrease of approximately $944 thousand is primarily due to a decrease in fleet capital outlay. San Fernando Landscape District Fund 2530 – The decrease of $800 is in contractual services.
Measure R Local Return Fund 2540 – The increase of approximately $1.1 million is primarily due higher contractual service costs for the School Crossing Guard program, which shifted from the General Fund as part of Public Works’ 3% cost- reduction target, as well as an increase in fleet capital outlay. Measure R Regional Return Fund 2550 – The increase of approximately $8.3 million is due to increased project appropriation for transportation related projects and personnel charges. Project appropriation in this fund includes HSIP Cycle 11 Local Match, Doran/Broadway-Brazil Grade Separation Project, HSIP Cycle 12 Local Match, Citywide Multi-Modal Equipment Modifications, and Safe Routes to School – Phase 6.
Transit Prop A Local Return Fund 2560 – The decrease of approximately $1.1 million is due to no new project appropriation for FY 2026-27. Transit Prop C Local Return Fund 2570 – The decrease of approximately $1.2 million is due to no new project appropriation for FY 2026-27. 269 of 745

1211a
6 8
9 4
Transit Utility Fund 2580 – The increase of approximately $240 thousand is primarily due to increased personnel costs, contractual services, and new project appropriation.
Asset Forfeiture Fund 2600 – The decrease of $250 thousand is primarily driven by a lower available fund balance. This reduction in resources results in decreases in contractual services and capital outlay, partially offset by an increase in furniture and equipment.
Police Fund 2610 – The net increase of approximately $871 thousand is due to higher settlement revenue, primarily budgeted towards overtime and miscellaneous maintenance and operation costs.
Supplemental Law Enforcement Fund 2620 – The increase of approximately $23 thousand is due to higher projected revenue used towards personnel costs. Fire Grant Fund 2650 – There is a decrease of approximately $281 thousand in training and supplies due to a decrease in anticipated grant revenue compared to the previous year.
Fire Mutual Aid Fund 2660 – The decrease of approximately $1.1 million is due to less anticipated mutual aid being requested and provided for the coming year due to staff shortages.
Nutritional Meals Grant Fund 2700 – The increase of approximately $4 thousand is due to more projected revenue, with slight increases in personnel costs and fleet charges.
Library Fund 2750 – The net decrease of approximately $131 thousand is primarily due to a shifting of library programming costs that are not directly associated with any grant or special donation revenue from the Library Fund to the General Fund. The Library Fund will continue to fund personnel costs and supplies related to grants and donations, while all other Library programming will be supported by the General Fund.
Cable Access Fund 2800 – The increase of $135 thousand is due to an increase in furniture and equipment, capital outlay, and general supplies, reflecting investments in media production improvements, modernization of broadcasting systems, and compliance with SB 707 and ADA requirements Electric Public Benefit Fund 2910 – The net increase of approximately $2.4 million is primarily due to increases in public benefit programs for renewable energy, energy-water efficiency, and conservation programs. 270 of 745

1311a
6 8
9 4
Debt Service Funds
There is only one Debt Service Fund with appropriation for FY 2026-27: the Police Building 2019 Lease Revenue Refunding Bond (Fund 3031). The net increase of approximately $2 thousand is primarily due to higher principal payments, partially offset by a decrease in interest payments on the bonds.

Capital Projects Funds
The approximately $52.2 million increase in the Capital Projects funds is primarily due to the following:
General Fund Capital Improvement Fund 4010 – The net decrease of $8.4 million is primarily due to a one-time budgeted transfer of $9.0 million to the General Fund dropping off. New projects for the upcoming fiscal year include Urban Cooling Project, Cavanagh Improvements, GSB Upgrades, Scholl Canyon Ballfield Parking Lot Paving, 1000 S. Central Ave. Master Plan, Beaudry Blvd. and Glenoaks Blvd. Landscape Improvement Project, Maple Park Playground Perimeter Fence, Restroom Renovation Project Design, and Rubberized Fall Surface Replacements at Playgrounds.

The Central Park Block Project had existing appropriation from previous fiscal years within this fund. In FY 2025-26, the Community Services & Parks department applied for and was awarded grant funding for this project. This resulted in an excess of $4.0 million of existing appropriation, which will be released to the Capital Improvement Fund available fund balance, to be transferred back to the General Fund in FY 2026-27.
State Gas Tax Fund 4020 – The decrease of $600 thousand is a result of less project appropriation. The projects with new appropriation for FY 2026-27 in this fund are As Needed Engineering Services, Street Tree Maintenance, Capital Improvement Project Support, and On Call Fiber Optic Services. Landfill Postclosure Fund 4030 – The increase of $60.0 million is in the transfers category and reflects the planned transfer to the General Fund, and subsequently to the Section 115 Trust Fund.
Library Mitigation Fee Fund 4070 – The decrease in appropriation of $100 thousand is due to less projected revenue and is budgeted as capital outlay allocated towards books.
SF Corridor Tax Share Fund 4100 – The increase of $1.1 million is for the Faircourt Lane Improvements project.
271 of 745

1411a
6 8
9 4
Measure A Fund 4130 – The increase of $200 thousand is due to new appropriation for the 1000 S. Central Ave. Master Plan project.

Enterprise Funds
The approximately $23.1 million net decrease in the Enterprise Funds is primarily due to the following:
Sewer Fund 5250 – The net decrease of approximately $26.7 million is primarily due to a decrease in capital projects. The two main capital projects in this fund are Hyperion Wastewater System and the Los Angeles/Glendale Water Reclamation Plant (LAGWRP) projects. Public Works is actively working with the City of Los Angeles to determine the cost for the next phase of the projects and will return to City Council with appropriation requests once the costs are determined. Other projects with new appropriation this year include On-Call Sewer and Storm Drain Repair Services, Sewer Reconstruction Program, Wastewater Capacity Improvement, and new project Gas Monitoring System at Doran Lift.
Refuse Disposal Fund 5300 – The net decrease of approximately $4.1 million is primarily driven by decreases in fleet capital outlay, capital projects, and contractual services. Additionally, depreciation is treated as a non-budgetary item starting in FY 2026-27 since it is a non-cash expense.
Fiber Optic Fund 5400 – The decrease of approximately $633 thousand is primarily due to decreased personnel costs resulting from a vacancy, as well as decreases in hourly wages and contractual services.
Verdugo Fire Communication Fund 5800 – The net decrease of approximately $2.0 million is primarily due to less capital outlay due to one-time purchases the prior year. Additionally, depreciation is treated as a non-budgetary item starting in FY 2026-27 since it is a non-cash expense.
Electric Utility Funds 5820, 5830, 5850 & 5880 – The net decrease of approximately $3.5 million is mainly due to decreases in capital project appropriation, contractual services, purchased power, and fuel natural gas.

These were slightly offset by an increase in transfers out, related to the transfer of property at 805 Fairmont, as well as an increase in capital outlay. A portion of the Office of Sustainability shifted to the Electric Works Revenue Fund from Management Services, which resulted in a slight increase in personnel costs, which was offset by decreases in hourly wages and overtime. Some of the major CIP projects include GWP City Owned Solar Program Phase II, GWP Admin Remodeling, Acacio/Tropico Substation Upgrade, 4kV to 12kV Feeder Upgrade Program, and AMI Electric Meter Upgrade Program.
272 of 745

1511a
6 8
9 4
Water Utility Funds 5920, 5930, 5950 & 5980 – The increase of approximately $13.9 million is primarily due to an increase in capital projects appropriation, including Water AMI Endpoint Replacement, WS Pipeline Replacement Project, and WS Valve Replacement Program. These increases were offset by decreases in contractual services, hourly wages, and safety allocation charge. A portion of the Office of Sustainability shifted to the Water Works Revenue Fund from Management Services, resulting in a slight increase in personnel costs.

Internal Service Funds
The approximately $18.1 million net decrease in the Internal Service Funds is primarily due to the following:
Fleet Management Fund 6010 – The net decrease of approximately $4.0 million is primarily due to a decrease in fleet capital outlay and the removal of depreciation from the budget, as depreciation will be treated as a non-budgetary, non-cash expense beginning FY 2026-27.
Joint Air Support Fund 6020 – The decrease of approximately $169 thousand is due to decreases in furniture and equipment, utilities costs, training, and travel.

Additionally, depreciation is no longer budgeted as of FY 2026-27. These decreases were slightly offset by an increase in vehicle maintenance costs. ITD Infrastructure Fund 6030 – The net decrease of approximately $4.6 million is primarily due to decreases in capital outlay, contractual services, computer hardware, personnel costs, and rent. Additionally, depreciation is no longer included in the budget.
ITD Applications Fund 6040 – The net decrease of approximately $3.9 million is primarily due to decreases in hourly wages, contractual services, and rent.

Additionally, depreciation is no longer included in the budget. These decreases were slightly offset by increases in personnel costs.
Building Maintenance Fund 6070 – The net decrease of approximately $2.1 million is primarily due to less project appropriation and less capital outlay.

This was slightly offset by an increase in personnel costs, general supplies, and repairs to building and grounds. New project appropriation includes UPS Replacements & Repairs, Paint Police Building, Exchange Parking Structure Mezzanine Roof Resurfacing, and Corporation Yard and Integrated Waste Locker Room Renovation.
Unemployment Insurance Fund 6100 – The increase of approximately $22 thousand is due to an increase in claims.
Liability Insurance Fund 6120 – The net decrease of approximately $346 thousand is primarily due to decreases in legal consultation fees, excess 273 of 745

1611a
6 8
9 4
insurance premiums, and ITD service charge, slightly offset by an increase in claims. Compensation Insurance Fund 6140 – The net decrease of approximately $348 thousand is primarily due to lower claim payments and excess insurance premium, offset by increases in personnel costs and contractual services. Dental Insurance Fund 6150 – The decrease of approximately $25 thousand is due to decreases in claims and premiums.
Medical Insurance Fund 6160 – The increase of approximately $826 thousand is due to increases in premiums and claims.
Vision Insurance Fund 6170 – The decrease of approximately $34 thousand is primarily due to a decrease in premiums.
Compensated Absences Fund 6400 – The decrease of approximately $368 thousand is primarily due to decreases in comp time and separation payouts, slightly offset by an increase in vacation payouts. RHSP Benefits Fund 6410 – The increase of approximately $128 thousand is primarily due to an increase in separation payouts.
Post-Employment Benefits Fund 6420 – The decrease of approximately $62 thousand is due to decreases in retiree Medicare Part A reimbursement, medical benefits for survivors of deceased employees, and PERS replacement benefit.
Wireless Fund 6600 – The decrease of approximately $3.2 million is primarily due to decreases in capital outlay, personnel costs, and ITD service charge.

Additionally, depreciation is no longer included in the budget.

AUTHORIZED FULL-TIME SALARIED POSITIONS
For FY 2026-27, there are no proposed changes to the authorized full-time salaried position count. Position increases within departments were managed by reallocating from the pool of defunded vacant positions rather than increasing the overall authorized count. The following table provides a summary of the authorized full-time salaried position count for FY 2025-26 and proposed FY 2026-27.

Adopted
FY 2025-26
Proposed
FY 2026-27
All Funds 1,651.0 1,651.0
General Fund 999.0* 992.1**
* Includes 35.0 defunded vacant positions
274 of 745

1711a
6 8
9 4
** Includes 21.0 defunded vacant positions

PROPOSED FEES CHANGES
The FY 2026-27 Proposed Citywide Fee Schedule lists 2,042 fees administered by the City. In an ongoing effort to streamline processes, while providing the most up-to-date information, staff wished to pilot an annual partial fee study instead of a comprehensive citywide fee study every 5 to 7 years. Library, Arts & Culture and Community Development were two departments that participated in this pilot program conducted by Matrix Consulting Group. The purpose of the study was to revisit the cost rollups used in the various fee calculations, staff time estimates and assumptions, and to account for any major shifts in costs or organizational structures that have occurred since the City’s previous citywide fee study (completed in 2024).

Fees are commonly adopted by public agencies to recover costs associated with the provision of specific services benefiting the user, thereby reducing the use of General Fund (and other funds) resources for such purposes. Actual costs to provide services include the direct cost of labor to process and perform each service, as well as associated support costs (indirect costs). Indirect costs include departmental and central service overhead costs. The City may charge fees, up to the full cost recovery, provided that those fees do not exceed the maximum limits as may be established under state law.

In addition to the fee study, we also received requests from Glendale Water & Power, Fire, and Police (which were not part of the pilot fee study) for fee increases to full cost recovery or to create new fees for existing or new services.

The FY 2026-27 Proposed Citywide Fee Schedule includes parking rate increases which were part of the implementation of new revenue initiatives. The rate increases impact downtown on/off street rates as well as parking garages.

Subsequent to the fee presentation during budget study session 3, Community Development updated the Building and Safety fee for EV charging stations based on State Assembly Bill 1820. This regulatory requirement resulted in a modification to one fee and the addition of five new fees for existing services (Section 1: Building and Safety Fees #208-#213).

Subsequent to the fee presentation during budget study session 3, Community Development proposed modification of Administrative Citations (150 fee increases) and added additional Glendale Municipal Code and Building Code violations to Administrative Citation citable offenses (24 new fees (fines) for existing services (violations of the Code)). The proposed changes are requested to appropriately dissuade violations of the Glendale Municipal Code and Building Code including unpermitted work, unlicensed operations, and unkept properties. 275 of 745

1811a
6 8
9 4
Glendale’s Code Enforcement team maintains the standards of the Glendale Municipal Code for the entire City. Inspectors seek compliance with property owners generally through conversations, a warning notice, Notice of Violation, and when necessary, citations. If three citations do not result in compliance, inspectors refer the case to the City Attorney for prosecution. As the citation amounts were set over a decade ago, the fine does not financially reflect the severity or seriousness of the violation to encourage compliance. It is recommended these fines are increased, and several new ones added so inspectors can cite for those violations as well.

Section 53069.4 of the California Government Code authorizes a local agency to utilize civil penalties or administrative citations as a means of enforcing municipal code provisions. Cities use administrative code enforcement remedies as an alternative or as a complement to civil actions or criminal prosecution of municipal code violations.

The Code Enforcement process includes a warning, followed by a Notice of Violation with a compliance deadline. An extension is granted when the circumstances allow for it, and the property or business owner has demonstrated good faith toward working to a resolution. However, if progress is not met by the compliance deadline, having meaningful citations which match the severity of the violation is critical in gaining compliance. Staff will issue three citations, escalating in the amount of the fine until compliance is met. If the property or business owner continues to refuse to come into compliance, the case will be sent to the City Attorney’s office for prosecution.

Staff believes that this administrative code enforcement system is a preferable alternative to criminal prosecution in many cases because the process is speedy and efficient; it is oriented towards obtaining compliance; moreover, it conserves public resources. Once a property owner has been put on notice of a required violation compliance deadline and it is not met, the citation process consists of a code enforcement officer issuing a citation to a property owner or other responsible party, and the property owner or responsible party either paying the fine or contesting the citation. If the citation is contested, a hearing is held and the citation is either confirmed or rescinded. Prior to the hearing, it is required that the fine is remitted in advance. The decision of the independent third-party hearing officer upholding the citation is subject to judicial review.

The amount of the fine for the particular violation is set forth in the schedule of fines established by City Council resolution. Fines are currently in a three-tier system of fine amounts whereby each tier contains a group of code violations grouped by severity and seriousness, and each with its own progressive fine amounts.

Generally, violations for which the third-tier fines apply are those that involve immediate threats to life/safety and/or have a significant impact on the community, such as unauthorized activity for which a permit is required, violation of a stop work order, or unauthorized entry after posting of a "yellow'' or "red tag" mandating vacation of a building due to safety concerns.
276 of 745

1911a
6 8
9 4
Second-tier fines are for those violations that are also life/safety concerns but of a slightly lower order of seriousness than the third-tier fine violations such as structural hazards and hazardous plumbing, electrical or mechanical equipment.

The first-tier fines are for those violations that are not immediate life/safety threats but nevertheless impact the community (littering, landscaping, smoking, signs). Payment of all fines is required within thirty (30) days from the date of the citation.

Currently, third-tier fines are: $400 for the first violation, $1,000 for the second same violation within one year of the citation for the first violation, and $2,000 for the third same violation within one year of the citation for the first violation. The second-tier fines are: $200, $400, $1000; first-tier fines are: $100, $200, $500.

It is recommended that the tier structure be modified as: Third-tier violations: $1000, $2000, $4000. Second-tier violations: $750, $1500, $3000. First-tier violations: $500, $1000, $2000, with the exception of violations that are infractions under the Code, which will remain at the current amount. Pursuant to Government Code Section 53069.4(a)(1), the maximum fine for a violation of any local ordinance that would otherwise be an infraction cannot exceed the maximum limits set forth in Government Code 36900(b), which for most infractions is capped at $100 for a first violation, $200 for a second violation of the same Code section within one year, and $500 for each additional violation of the same Code section within one year.

Current Amounts Proposed Amounts
1st Violation 2nd Violation 3rd Violation 1st Violation 2nd Violation 3rd Violation 1st Tier $100 $200 $500 $500 $1,000 $2,000
2nd Tier $200 $400 $1,000 $750 $1,500 $3,000
3rd Tier $400 $1,000 $2,000 $1,000 $2,000 $4,000
As with all Glendale enforcement programs, the City’s goal is compliance with codes, and not punitive actions against the violator. The administrative citation program, as presented, is intended to achieve this. Unfortunately, Code Enforcement is often met with repeat violators, and/or those who believe the cost of compliance is more effort than paying for the citation or repeat citations, so they choose not to come into compliance. If the citations were more impactful in encouraging compliance and dissuading remaining in violation, it is more likely a resolution will be reached after the first citation, saving staff resources, but also ensuring greater compliance throughout the City. Those who come into compliance in a timely manner, will not receive a citation as citations are only issued when a property owner chooses not to come into compliance within the set deadline.

Glendale City CouncilJune 23, 2026

Glendale City Council
June 23, 2026