Table of Contents
1. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................ 5
1.1. GENERAL BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................. 5
1.2. PROPOSAL DELIVERY AND SCHEDULE OF EVENTS ............................................................................................. 5
1.3. DISCREPANCIES OR OMISSIONS .................................................................................................................... 5
1.4. CONTINGENCIES ........................................................................................................................................ 6
1.5. QUESTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS ................................................................................................................. 6
1.6. DISPOSITION OF MATERIAL AND CONFIDENTIAL OR PROPRIETARY INFORMATION ................................................. 6
1.7. BRAND NAMES ......................................................................................................................................... 6
1.8. KNOWLEDGE OF REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................................. 7
1.9. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS ............................................................................................................................ 7
1.10. CALIFORNIA'S PUBLIC RECORDS ACT ............................................................................................................. 8
2. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................................. 8
2.1. BUSINESS LICENSE ...................................................................................................................................... 8
2.2. PREVAILING WAGES ................................................................................................................................... 8
2.3. REPRESENTATIVES ...................................................................................................................................... 9
2.4. EMPLOYEE CONDUCT................................................................................................................................ 10
3. RFP RESPONSE FORMAT AND SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS ........................................................... 10
3.1. COVER LETTER / INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 11
3.2. TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................ 11
3.3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. 11
3.4. EXPERIENCE ............................................................................................................................................ 11
3.5. THIRD-PARTY / SUBCONTRACTORS ............................................................................................................. 11
3.6. STAFF BIOGRAPHIES ................................................................................................................................. 12
3.7. PROPOSAL RESPONSE ............................................................................................................................... 12
3.8. EXHIBITS A THROUGH H ............................................................................................................................ 12
3.9. NON-DISCLOSURE CONFLICT OF INTEREST .................................................................................................... 12
3.10. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT .......................................................................................................... 13
3.11. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INSURANCE .......................................................................................................... 13 Item #13. Page 38
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 184
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
3.12. ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .............................................................................................................. 13
3.13. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION .................................................................................................................. 13
3.14. PARTICIPATION CLAUSE ............................................................................................................................ 14
3.15. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY ........................................................................................................................ 14
3.16. COMPANY REFERENCES............................................................................................................................. 14
3.17. LINE-ITEM PRICING .................................................................................................................................. 14
4. SCOPE OF SERVICES ................................................................................................................. 14
4.1. PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................................. 14
4.2. CONSULTANT RESPONSIBILITIES AND SCOPE OF WORK ................................................................................... 16
4.2.1. TREE INVENTORY & CANOPY ANALYSIS SERVICES .......................................................................................... 17
4.2.2. URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN SERVICES ............................................................................................ 17
4.3. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS ...................................................................................................................... 19
4.4. CONTRACT TERM ..................................................................................................................................... 20
5. EVALUATION AND CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS ............................................................. 20
5.1. INITIAL SCREENING ................................................................................................................................... 20
5.2. EVALUATION ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................................................... 20
5.3. COST EVALUATION ................................................................................................................................... 21
5.4. REFERENCE CHECKS .................................................................................................................................. 21
5.5. DEMONSTRATIONS/ INTERVIEWS ............................................................................................................... 22
5.6. FINANCIAL DOCUMENTATION .................................................................................................................... 22
5.7. BEST AND FINAL OFFER ............................................................................................................................. 22
5.8. CONSULTANT SELECTION ........................................................................................................................... 22
5.9. LETTER OF INTENT TO AWARD .................................................................................................................... 23 “EXHIBIT A, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONFLICT OF INTEREST/NON-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT” .... 24 “EXHIBIT B, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT EXCEPTIONS SUMMARY”......................................... 25 “EXHIBIT C, ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND CERTIFICATION OF ABILITY TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN COVERAGES SPECIFIED” ................................................................................. 26 “EXHIBIT D, ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT” ................................................................................... 27 “EXHIBIT E, DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION CERTIFICATION FORM”....................................................... 28 “EXHIBIT F, PARTICIPATION CLAUSE” ..................................................................................................... 29 Item #13. Page 39
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 185
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
“EXHIBIT G, SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY” ............................................................................................... 30 “EXHIBIT H” REFERENCES WORKSHEET .................................................................................................. 31 Item #13. Page 40
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 186
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
1. OVERVIEW
1.1. GENERAL BACKGROUND
The City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter “City”) is inviting qualified Consultants (hereinafter “Consultant”) to submit a proposal response for Request for Proposals (“RFP”) #21/22-011 for Consultant Services for The Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan in accordance with the minimum Scope of Services and Specifications indicated herein.
Consultants wishing to participate in the RFP solicitation must be registered as a Consultant on Planet Bids through the City website at https://www.Cityofrc.us/your-government/procurement. Only those responses received from registered Consultants will be accepted. Responses must be submitted by the named Consultant that has downloaded the RFP, this information is indicated in the bid system and provides the ability to tabulate the responses in accordance with the named Consultants. Submitting a response under a Consultant name that does not appear to be on the Prospective Bidders list will be deemed as non-responsive and disqualify said response from further consideration.
1.2. PROPOSAL DELIVERY AND SCHEDULE OF EVENTS
Complete RFP responses must be received electronically via Planet Bids prior to the due date and time specified in the below Schedule of Events. Please note, there will be no paper responses accepted. The City shall not be responsible for any delays by transmission errors.
Schedule of Events
Event Description Date & Time
Post RFP April 20, 2022
Questions Due May 11, 2022, 9:00 am
Addendum Issued May 17, 2022
RFP Response Due Date May 25, 2022, 9:00 am
(The City reserves the right to change schedule of events without prior notice or responsibility to Consultant.)
1.3. DISCREPANCIES OR OMISSIONS
Consultants finding discrepancies or omissions in the RFP or having any doubts as to the meaning or intent of any part thereof shall submit such questions or concerns in writing electronically via Planet Bids. The City bears no responsibility for oral instructions or representations. Addenda to this RFP shall be considered a part of this RFP and shall become part of any final Contract that may be derived from this RFP.
Item #13. Page 41
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 187
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
1.4. CONTINGENCIES
This RFP should not be considered as a contract to purchase goods or services but is a Request for Proposal in accordance with the terms and conditions herein and will not necessarily give rise to a Contract. However, RFP responses should be as detailed and complete as possible to facilitate the formation of a contract based on the RFP response(s) that are pursued should the City decide to do so.
Completion of this RFP form and its associated appendices are a requirement. Failure to do so may disqualify your RFP response submittal. Consultants must submit signed RFP responses by the due date and time as specified herein. Consultants will be considered non-responsive if the above requirements are not submitted as requested.
Any scope of services, contingencies, special instruction and/or terms and conditions applicable to this RFP and any purchase order derived thereafter shall be effective as of the issue date of a purchase order for the requested work (the “Effective Date”), and shall remain in full force and effect until sixty (60) days after the City has accepted the work in writing and has made final payment, unless sooner terminated by written agreement signed by both parties.
1.5. QUESTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS
All questions or clarification requests must be submitted directly through the City’s bid system no later than the due date and time indicated in the above Schedule of Events. Answers and/or clarifications will be provided in the form of an Addendum and will be posted for download from the City ’s bid system in accordance with the above “Schedule of Events”.
From the issuance date of this RFP until a Consultant is awarded, Consultants are not permitted to communicate with any City staff or officials regarding this procurement, other than during interviews, demonstrations, and/or site visits, except at the direction of Ruth Cain, CPPB, Procurement Manager, the designated representative of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1.6. DISPOSITION OF MATERIAL AND CONFIDENTIAL OR PROPRIETARY INFORMATION All materials submitted in response to this RFP solicitation will become the property of the City and will be returned only at the City ’s option and at the expense of the Consultant submitting the RFP response. A copy of the RFP response will be retained for official files and become a public record. Any material that a Consultant considers as confidential but does not meet the disclosure exemption requirements of the California Public Records Act may be made available to the public regardless of a notation or markings of confidentiality or otherwise.
1.7. BRAND NAMES
Item #13. Page 42
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 188
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
Any reference to brand names and/or numbers in the solicitation is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive, unless otherwise specified. RFP responses offering equivalent items meeting the standards of quality specified may be considered, unless other specified, providing the RFP response clearly describes the article offered and how it differs from the referenced brand. Unless a Consultant specifies otherwise, it is understood that the Consultant is offering a referenced brand item as specified in the solicitation. The City reserves the right to determine whether a substitute offer is equivalent to and meets the standards of quality indicated by the brand name references, and the City may require the supply of additional descriptive material and a sample.
1.8. KNOWLEDGE OF REQUIREMENTS
The Consultant shall carefully review all documents referenced and made a part of the solicitation document to ensure that all information required to properly respond has been submitted or made available and all requirements are priced in the RFP response. Failure to examine any documents, drawings, specifications, or instructions will be at the Consultant’s sole risk.
Consultants shall be responsible for knowledge of all items and conditions contained in their RFP responses and in this RFP, including any City issued clarifications, modifications, amendments, or addenda. The City will provide notice of any changes and clarifications to perspective Consultants by way of addenda to Planet Bids; however, it is the Consultant’s responsibility to ascertain that the RFP response includes all addenda issued prior to the RFP due date.
1.9. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
The issuance of this RFP does not constitute an agreement by the City that any contract will be entered by the City. The City expressly reserves the right at any time to:
• Waive or correct any defect or informality in any response, RFP, or RFP procedure. • Reject any or all RFPs.
• Reissue a Request for RFPs.
• Prior to submission deadline for RFPs, modify all or any portion of the selection procedures, including deadlines for accepting responses, the specifications or requirements for any materials, equipment or services to be provided under this RFP, or the requirements for contents or format of the RFPs. • The City recognizesthat price is only one of several criteria to be used in judging a product or service, and the City is not legally bound to accept the lowest RFP response. • The City reserves the right to conduct pre-award discussions and/or pre-Contract negotiations with any or all responsive and responsible Consultants who submit RFP responses. • Procure any materials, equipment or services specified in this RFP by any other means. • Determine that no project will be pursued.
Item #13. Page 43
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 189
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
• The City reserves the right to inspect the Consultant’s place of business prior to award or at any time during the contract term or any extension thereof, to determine the Consultant’s capabilities and qualifications.
1.10. CALIFORNIA'S PUBLIC RECORDS ACT
The City complies with the California Public Records Act, Government Code Section 6250 et seq, Public records are open to inspection always during the office hours of the state or local agency and every person has a right to inspect any public record, except as hereafter provided. Any reasonably segregable portion of a record shall be available for inspection by any person requesting the record after deletion of the portions that are exempted by law.
Neither an RFP in its entirety, nor proposed prices shall be considered confidential and proprietary.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, companies are hereby notified that all materials submitted in response to this RFP are subject to California's Public Records Act. The City 's receipt, review, evaluation or any other act or omission concerning any such information shall not create an acceptance by the City or any obligation or duty to prevent the disclosure of any such information except as required by Government Code Section 6253.
Companies who submit information they believe should be exempt from disclosure under the Public Records Act shall clearly mark each document as confidential, proprietary or exempt, and state the legal basis for the exemption with supporting citations to the California Code. Pursuant to California Law, if the information is requested under the Public Records Act, the City shall make a final determination if any exemption exists for the City to deny the request and prevent disclosure. The City will withhold such information from public disclosure under the Public Records Act only if the City determines, in its sole discretion, that there is a legal basis to do so.
2. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
2.1. BUSINESS LICENSE
A selected Consultant awarded a contract shall be required to obtain a Rancho Cucamonga Business License no later than five (5) business days from notification of award prior to being issued a Purchase Order. A selected Consultant must possess and maintain all appropriate licenses/certifications necessary in the performance of duties required under this RFP and will provide copies of licenses/certifications immediately upon request throughout the term of the Contract.
2.2. PREVAILING WAGES
Item #13. Page 44
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 190
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
Where labor is required for a public work as a part of any requirement covered by this RFP, pursuant to the provisions of the Labor Code of the State of California and/or the federal Davis-Bacon Act, a selected Consultant(s) shall pay no less than those minimum wages unless an exemption applies. In certain cases, an exemption from the prevailing wage requirement may apply to the scope of work. (See Cal. Labor Code § 1720(c)(1), (5); 42 USC § 5310(a). However, the City makes no representations in this RFP that such an exemption will apply or that prevailing wages will not be required for a scope of work covered by this RFP.
2.3. REPRESENTATIVES
Should a selected Consultant require the services of a third-party to complete the Scope of Services indicated in this RFP, the awarded Consultant will not assign, transfer, convey or otherwise dispose of the contract or its right, title or interest in or to the same, or any part thereof. Any attempt by the awarded Consultant to so assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shall be null, void and of no effect.
The awarded Consultant shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged in performing the Services including Consultant’s subcontractor. All Services shall be performed by the awarded Consultant or under the awarded Consultant’s direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications, permits, and licenses required by state and local law to perform such services.
The awarded Consultant shall be responsible for payment of all employees’ and subcontractors’ wages and benefits and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer’s liability, workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social Security. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the services.
In case of default by the Consultant, the City may take the following actions which shall include but not be limited to; cancellation of any purchase order, procurement of the articles or service from other sources and may deduct from unpaid balance due to the Consultant, or may bill for excess costs so paid, and the prices paid by the City shall be considered the prevailing market prices paid at the time such purchase is made, withholding of payment until final resolution. Cost of transportation, handling, and/or inspection on deliveries, or Consultants for delivery, which do not meet specifications, will be for the account of the Consultant.
City Representative:
For the purposes of this Agreement, the contract administrator and City ’s representative shall be William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director, or such other person as designated in writing by City (“City ’s Representative”). It shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to assure that City ’s Representative is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services, and the Consultant shall refer any decisions that must be Item #13. Page 45
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 191
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
made to the City Representative. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the City Representative.
Consultant Representative:
The response to this RFP shall designate the representative of the Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith (“Consultant’s Representative”). It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of the Consultant’s Representative will be a substantial inducement for City to enter into an Agreement with the Consultant. Therefore, the Consultant’s Representative shall be responsible during the term of any Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting enough time to personally supervise the services hereunder. The successful Consultant may not change the Consultant’s Representative without the prior written approval of City ’s Representative.
2.4. EMPLOYEE CONDUCT
All Consultant personnel must observe all City regulations in effect at the location where the Services are being conducted. While on City property, the Consultant’s personnel shall be subject to oversight by City staff. Under no circumstances shall the Consultant’s or Consultant’s sub-contractor personnel be deemed as employees of the City. Consultant or Consultant’s subcontractor personnel shall not represent themselves to be employees of the City.
Consultant's personnel will always make their best efforts to be responsive, polite, and cooperative when interacting with representatives of the City and City employees. The Consultant's personnel shall be required to work in a pleasant and professional manner with City employees, outside Consultants and the public. Nothing contained in this RFP shall be construed as granting the Consultant the sole right to supply personal or contractual services required by the City or without the proper City approval and the issuance of a Purchase Order.
3. RFP RESPONSE FORMAT AND SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
Completion of this RFP form and its associated Exhibits are a requirement. To be considered responsive and evaluate RFP responses fairly and completely Consultants must comply with the format and submission requirements set out in this RFP, and provide all information requested. Failure to comply with this instruction will deem said RFP response as non-responsive and will not receive further consideration in the evaluation process.
If only one RFP response is received, the City reserves the right to discard the response, re-bid or proceed with an RFP review and negotiations.
Item #13. Page 46
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 192
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
RFP responses are due on the date and time indicated in the above schedule of events. Submittals shall be submitted electronically via Planet Bids; no paper RFP responses will be accepted. RFP responses must include the information required by this RFP.
3.1. COVER LETTER / INTRODUCTION
RFP responses must include the complete name and address of Consultant and the name, mailing address, and telephone number of the contact person regarding the RFP response. A signature by an authorized representative must be included on each RFP response. Said signature will be considered confirmation of the Consultants ability and willingness to comply with all provisions stated herein.
3.2. TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Table of Contents must be a comprehensive listing of the contents included in your RFP response. This section must include a clear definition of the material, exhibits and supplemental information identified by sequential page numbers and by section reference numbers. Each section of the RFP response will be separated by a title page at the beginning of each section.
3.3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Executive Summary shall condense and highlight the contents of the Consultant’s RFP response to provide the Evaluation Committee with a broad understanding of the Consultant’s approach, proposal, experience, and staffing.
3.4. EXPERIENCE
The Consultant shall provide a concise statement demonstrating the Consultant’s qualifications, experience, expertise, and capability to perform the requirements of this RFP. Provide a brief history of your company, including;
• The number of years in business,
• The firm’s service commitment to customers,
• If the firm is involved in any pending litigation that may affect its ability to provide its proposed solution or ongoing maintenance or support of its products and services. • A statement as to whether your firm is an individual proprietorship, partnership, corporation, or private nonprofit firm, and the date your company was formed or incorporated.
3.5. THIRD-PARTY / SUBCONTRACTORS
If the Consultant intends to subcontract, a detailed list of any sub-contractors, partners, or third-party Consultants who will be involved in the implementation of the proposed services including but not limited to:
Item #13. Page 47
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 193
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
• Description of the Consultant’s experience with each of the proposed subcontractors, • Three (3) customer references for each subcontractor to include references names, addresses, and telephone numbers, for products and services like those described in this RFP, • Describe the specific role of each.
3.6. STAFF BIOGRAPHIES
Submit the resumes of the individuals who will be performing the services for the City. Resumes shall be formatted in the following order:
• Position with the Company,
• Length of time with the Company,
• Licenses, registrations, and certifications as required by law to perform the Scope of Work described herein,
• Educational background,
• Role in the Project,
• Experience with the minimum requirements stated herein, • Work history on similar or like projects with the other municipalities.
3.7. PROPOSAL RESPONSE
Under this section Consultants shall provide a full, detailed response to the City ’s Scope of Services listed herein.
Consultants should be as thorough as possible in their response as it may be the only opportunity to convey information regarding your business, ability, and qualifications to complete the services needed.
3.8. EXHIBITS A THROUGH H
The following named Exhibits A through H are a requirement and must be complete and signed where required.
Exhibits are not to be included in your proposal response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G, H. Failure to comply with this instruction will deem your RFP submittal as non-responsive.
3.9. NON-DISCLOSURE CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Specify any possible conflicts of interest with your current clients or staff members and the City. A signed “Exhibit A, Conflict of Interest and Non-Disclosure Agreement” included herein must be submitted under the Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G, H.
Item #13. Page 48
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 194
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
3.10. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT
In addition to the acceptance of the City ’s Terms and Conditions, the successful Consultant will be required to enter into a Professional Services Agreement (“PSA”) with the City, a “Sample” of which is attached in the City ’s bid system for review. All requirements of said PSA must be completed by the successful Consultant and signed by both applicable parties prior to any services being rendered. This RFP sets forth some of the general provisions which may be included in the final PSA. In submitting a response to this RFP, Consultant will be deemed to have agreed to each clause unless otherwise indicated in “Exhibit B, Professional Services Agreement Exceptions Summary” and the City agrees to either accept the objection or deviation or change the PSA language in writing. Failure to raise any objections at the time of this RFP response submittal will result in a waiver of objection to any of the contractual language in the PSA at any other time. The signed Exception Summary must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types tab “Exhibits A – G, H”.
3.11. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INSURANCE
Consultants must meet all insurance requirements as outlined in the Professional Services Agreement. Ability to comply with said requirements must be indicated with signature of “Exhibit C, Acknowledgement of Insurance Requirements and Certification of Ability to Provide and Maintain Coverages Specified”. The awarded Consultant will be responsible for providing the required Certificates of Insurance and must be the Named Insured on the Certificates. Certificates of Insurance from any other entity other than the awarded Consultant, will not be accepted. The signed Acknowledgement of Insurance must be submitted under the Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G, H.
3.12. ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The Consultantshall hereby acknowledge they have received all posted Addendums, if any. It is the Consultant’s responsibility to log into the Bid System to identify and download the number of addenda that have been posted. Addenda issued in correspondence to this RFP shall be considered a part of this RFP and shall become part of any final Contract that may be derived from this RFP. Consultants must indicate their acknowledgement of any Addendums by way of signature on “Exhibit D, Addendum Acknowledgement” and must be submitted under the Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G, H.
3.13. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION
Bidding Consultants must verify by way of signature to “Exhibit E, Consultant Certification Form” that they are not listed on the governmentwide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the guidelines under 2 CFR 200 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), and that neither Consultant nor any of its proposed subcontractors are tax delinquent with the State of California. The signed exhibit must be submitted under the Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G, H.
Item #13. Page 49
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 195
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
3.14. PARTICIPATION CLAUSE
Consultants shall provide a completed “Exhibit F, Participation Clause”, must be submitted under the Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G, H. This will indicate a Consultants agreement to or not to allow other entities to utilize the RFP response and awarded contract as a piggyback option.
3.15. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY
“Exhibit G”, Signature of Authority must be submitted under the Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G, H.
Unsigned RFP responses will not be accepted. The Signature of Authority declares that the Consultant has carefully examined the instruction indicated herein including all terms and condition and specifications, and hereby proposes and agrees, if the Consultants RFP response is accepted, Consultant agrees to furnish all material in accordance with the instruction and specifications in the time and manner prescribed for the unit cost amounts set forth in the Consultants RFP response.
3.16. COMPANY REFERENCES
Provide a minimum of four (4) references, preferably with other municipalities in which similar services are being performed. References must be for work performed or completed within the past three (3) years. “Exhibit H, Reference Worksheet”, must be complete and uploaded into the Planet Bid system under the “Response Type” section identified as “Exhibit H”. While the Reference Worksheet accompanies your RFP response it is not to be discussed in any other area of the RFP response other than the “Response Type, Exhibit H” in Planet Bids.
3.17. LINE-ITEM PRICING
Line-item pricing for this RFP must be provided directly in the Planet Bids system under the “Line Items” tab.
This pricing is not an estimate and is firm fixed price for each item listed. Consultant’s pricing quotes outside of the pricing listed in Planet Bids under the “Line Items” tab will not be accepted or considered for award. Any additional cost required should be noted in the additional cost line item and a summary of the cost provided in the notes section of the line item. While Line-item pricing accompanies your RFP response it is not to be discussed in any other area of the RFP response other than the “Line Item” tab in Planet Bids. The City will not be obligated to any estimated pricing or pricing not identified in the “Line Item” tab in Planet Bids. Failure to provide the required Line-Item pricing in the required format will cause Consultants RFP response to be considered as non-responsive and be eliminated from proceeding any further in the process. Any questions or clarifications regarding how to correctly submit Line-Item pricing should be submitted by the “Questions Due” date and time indicated in the schedule of events.
4. SCOPE OF SERVICES
4.1. PURPOSE
Item #13. Page 50
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 196
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
The City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks a qualified, professional consultant team to develop a robust Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP), tree ordinances, city tree inventory, tree canopy analysis, and locationspecific species policies. These shall incorporate urban forest management best practices, including meeting or exceeding the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission reduction goals set by the City’s Climate Action Plan, wildfire prevention, and a long-term citywide tree canopy cover goal. The UFMP will evaluate the current health of the urban forest and document the types, condition, and distribution of trees within the City and its sphere of influence. The canopy analysis shall also identify opportunities for urban forest expansion for both public and private trees. The UFMP shall provide the City with a long-term plan to manage the citywide urban forest and include comprehensive tree ordinances. The UFMP shall be a comprehensive guide for the City’s urban forest management over the next 50 years.
Specific objectives to be addressed in the UFMP include, but are not limited to:
• Developing a comprehensive city tree inventory, including tree canopy mapping and analysis for the City of Rancho Cucamonga that incorporates existing data. • Provide recommendations to overturn and replenish the declining canopy in older residential neighborhoods and commercial corridors.
• Recommend a tree removal and replacement cycle for species maintained by the City. • Strategies to incentivize tree planting and maintenance throughout the community including disadvantaged areas.
• Strategies to address topped and previously unmaintained or poorly maintained trees. • Develop community feedback, build a consensus, and a vision from community stakeholders regarding a desirable, achievable, and sustainable future urban forest. • Conduct a series of community outreach efforts and resident surveys. • Review existing plans, documents, regulations and ordinances and provide feedback, thoughts, and recommendations to City staff to ensure the UFMP is integrated into City processes in order to protect the urban forest.
• Provide tree preservation ordinance language and options for effective enforcement of a tree preservation ordinance for community, private, and commercial trees. • Recommend tree species and create an urban tree palette for development within the city for mixeduse, residential, commercial, and industrial development. • Integrate State and Fire District defensible space requirements and standards for the Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area into the UFMP.
• Strategies to mitigate tree and infrastructure conflicts around streets, sidewalks, and utilities. Prepare a Street Tree Plan for tree species in the public right-of-way. • Identify tree care, best maintenance practices, and establish a city grid pruning cycle. • Assist with the adoption of the UFMP and tree preservation ordinances through Planning Commission and City Council meetings.
Item #13. Page 51
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 197
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
The City does not have a comprehensive tree preservation ordinance nor a comprehensive plan to preserve, expand, or manage the urban forest which results in canopy loss and missed urban forestry opportunities. As the City population expands and climate change becomes a larger issue, there appears to be increased interest from the community to preserve and plant trees along with managing and possibly replacing trees that are of ages and species that are creating a wildfire hazard. The UFMP represents a cross-departmental initiative that will build on planning efforts such as the newly adopted General Plan, the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan, and the Climate Action Plan. Collaborating departments include the Public Works Services Department, the Planning Department, Engineering Services, the City Attorney, the Community Affairs Team, Community Improvement, the Department of Innovation & Technology, and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, along with numerous supporting entities, organizations, and community stakeholders.
4.2. CONSULTANT RESPONSIBILITIES AND SCOPE OF WORK
The UFMP shall be a comprehensive guide for the City’s urban forest management over the next 50 years. It shall be used to mitigate future state mandates, carbon sequestration, drought, urban heat effects, and wildfires. It will be used to set policy for tree planting, removal, and trimming. The consultant will develop the UFMP through engagement and outreach with City and Fire District staff, stakeholders, and the community.
Work to be performed by the consultant personnel includes but are not limited to the following Scope of Work:
• The UFMP must be completed within a twelve (12) month period from the first kick-off meeting, and any code changes to the municipal code should be completed within a three (3) month period after completion of the UFMP.
• The project area includes the entire City of Rancho Cucamonga and its sphere of influence. • At minimum, monthly meetings are required to keep City staff informed as the UFMP progresses. • Consultant shall maintain a current "Action Item" list as meetings occur. • Consultant shall provide and maintain a "Critical Path" project schedule. This schedule shall be updated by the Consultant as appropriate.
• Consultant shall work with City staff to obtain GIS information that is useful to this project. • Consultant shall prepare 1 administrative draft document and 1 public review document. All draft documents shall be produced in a graphic format with text in an editable Word document for easy review/editing.
• Consultant shall provide the City with a cost proposal by task for the work to be performed. • Consultant shall provide and an electronic version in digital and print ready formats as well as all final source files, which will become property of the City.
Item #13. Page 52
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 198
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
4.2.1. TREE INVENTORY & CANOPY ANALYSIS SERVICES
The consultant will review and integrate existing City tree ESRI GIS Database information (the current City tree-maintained inventory consists of 77,005 tree locations) and conduct an inventory of all trees located on public property such as sidewalks, streets, medians, public-right of way, public parks, and other accessible City-owned property. The City ESRI GIS Database also includes privately maintained trees in the public rightof-way and the analysis shall include trees located outside of public property within city limits. Trees in wetland corridors need to be inventoried and included in the canopy analysis. The inventory will include, but will not be limited to, collection of data within City limits and the sphere of influence. Data/Inventory will be collected in a form compatible with the City’s existing ESRI GIS database requirement to facilitate long-term management of data by City staff.
The consultant will complete a canopy analysis that provides information on urban forest structure (i.e. species composition, number of trees, tree density, tree health, and other characteristics) that includes trees located outside of public property within city limits and can be geographically segmented. The analysis shall integrate existing data sets from the City GIS inventory as well as add new findings. Consultant shall recommend and create additional analysis of tree canopy on private property, in wetlands corridors, and in designated conservation areas. This analysis will include any other assessments to identify areas of opportunity for planting trees such as by removing concrete/sidewalks, or through planting trees on private property, residential front yards, business complexes, schools, churches and in other strategic areas. This analysis will also include assessments specific to current wildfire hazard reduction and future wildfire hazard management by assessing the community and climate value of fire prone trees, aging and decaying Eucalyptus windrows, and non-producing citrus groves. The canopy analysis shall integrate the understanding of climate change, by incorporating urban heat island effects and average land surface temperature, to inform how urban forest management and expansion activities can mitigate heat impacts. It will also provide information on species composition and age and include wildfire risk assessment based in part on age, species composition, and location relative to the Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Consultant will integrate any existing and historical data which may require collaboration with City staff involved in relevant projects and datasets.
The consultant will determine the optimal size and species of trees to plant in strategic locations for safety and care, maximum greenhouse gas absorption, economic impact, cultural benefit, and wildfire safety. The data will be later used by City staff to design future replanting projects and create/update policies. The resulting analysis will be integrated throughout the public outreach process and function as a primary resource for recommendations and goals for the UFMP.
4.2.2. URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN SERVICES
Item #13. Page 53
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 199
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
The UFMP will be led by a science based, community driven process. The plan will identify a fifty (50) year plan to enhance the urban forest with meaningful and achievable goals. The plan will identify long-term canopy goals that are compatible with the various planning areas within the city and its sphere of influence.
Components of the plan will include an analysis of the current condition of the urban forest, including management methods and stakeholder opinions. The plan will also include an equity analysis to help ensure future urban forest management provides socio-economically equitable benefits to Rancho Cucamonga residents. During the development of the UFMP, the consultant will conduct a review of the City’s municipal codes, applicable State laws, the California Fire Code as adopted by the Fire District, along with current tree care practices, policies, and procedures that currently guide management of city trees.
The Consultant will drive the process to meet at minimum once per month in person or via video conference call or webinar with City and Fire District staff to review the Scope of Work, desired deliverables, schedules, and identify criteria for documenting and developing the UFMP. If necessary, the consultant or City staff will dictate if more meetings are required to finalize the UFMP or conduct public outreach meetings with the community. Discussions shall include community engagement strategies with the City’s Community Affairs Team.
The Consultant will assess the status of the City’s urban forest and conduct an analysis to support a determination for tree canopy goals within the city that meet goals for urban forest health, equity, wildfire prevention and safety, and related watershed and community benefits.
The plan will also identify tree care and maintenance best practices, establish grid pruning cycles based on geographical location and landscape maintenance district, pest control, yearly tree mitigation plantings, community involvement opportunities, related policies, procedures, and develop a comprehensive tree species list to be used for future tree plantings within the city. The plan shall include a comprehensive set of actions for achieving the desired tree canopy goals.
The consultant will also assess the urban forest team and interview Public Works staff to provide a recommendation on staffing levels and the proper use of the team to implement the initiatives of the UFMP.
Existing resources and the current budget will also be discussed with the consultant to effectively achieve a work plan.
The consultant will prepare a summary of the hazard presented by certain tree species present in the urban forest, and within the northern portion of the city. The report shall include recommended specific actions to manage and mitigate hazards through tree maintenance practices, selective removal/replacement strategies for both public and private trees, and ordinances restricting the planting of certain species.
Item #13. Page 54
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 200
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
The consultant will develop a comprehensive review of the City’s tree ordinances and related municipal codes to develop language for a comprehensive tree preservation and management ordinance that is consistent with the UFMP, the General Plan, the Climate Action Plan, and the Community Wildfire Protection Plan. The plan will define the needs of a tree preservation and management ordinance, and monitoring/oversight responsibilities needed to effectively manage and maintain such an ordinance. The consultant will assist with creating language to have repercussions when individuals remove tree assets within the public right-of-way or add hazardous tree assets citywide as well as within the Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. It is expected that this work will include an analysis of tree policies that might be appropriate for the City to implement with new development. The consultant will assist staff to determine the best language and structure for an impact fee for the removal of existing trees on private and public property during the entitlement process.
The consultant will facilitate a minimum of six (6) stakeholder/community engagement activities. Activities may include a combination of community “pop-up” events, in person surveys, and hybrid or traditional workshops. The consultant will develop key messaging and collateral, consistent with City branding, such as posters, postcards, flyers, social media, and survey questions, to solicit participation and input as part of the engagement process for the UFMP development.
Engagement activities are open for discussion to communicate the UFMP to the community. The consultant is encouraged to suggest other methods that could encourage public participation. The consultant is expected to develop an authentic public outreach and education campaign that reaches the community planning groups, residents, nonprofit organizations, businesses, academia, community leaders, and City staff to solicit unique ideas and create an alignment with the purpose of the UFMP. Multilingual translation at meetings and of collateral material to be provided by the City.
With City staff facilitation, the consultant will deliver a presentation at two (2) Planning Commission meetings and three (3) City Council meetings on the UFMP process, results, and recommendations that include the adoption of a comprehensive tree ordinance.
The Consultant will prepare a draft plan for City review and incorporate City Comments in the final document. • Develop an outline of content and receive City approval prior to proceeding. • Develop an administrative draft for review and feedback. • Develop a public draft for review and feedback.
• Finalize a final UFMP document for adoption by the City Council.
4.3. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
To qualify the Consultant must meet the following minimum requirements:
1. Five (5) years of public project design experience.
Item #13. Page 55
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 201
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. The Consultant must be licensed in the State of California.
3. A general description of the firm, and the credentials and background of the principal and team members who will be responsible for the project.
4. A documented summary and listing of past and present experience including at least three (3) examples of providing Urban Forestry Management Plan and Tree Inventory Services for other public agencies.
5. Experience with or demonstrated knowledge of wildfire prevention and mitigation specific to tree species selection, placement, density, management, removal, and replacement.
6. Demonstrate an ability to lead an equitable engagement process with diverse participation.
7. References with contact information of successfully completed UFMP on schedule and within budget.
8. The Consultant shall prepare a project understanding outline explaining the plan and process to develop the UFMP, a timeline for project completion, and a fee proposal for the work required to complete the UFMP.
9. The names, qualifications, and scope of work to be performed by any sub-consultants who have extensive experience in the specific discipline of the work they will provide to the team.
10. Demonstrate sufficient named/designated staff and resources to meet the requirements of the contract including redundancy of qualified personnel such that key persons can be readily replaced, with City’s pre-approval, in the event of illness, employment change, or other unforeseen reasons.
4.4. CONTRACT TERM
All work associated with the UFMP must be finalized within fifteen (15) months from the first kick-off meeting with City staff. The award of contract by City Council shall be executed before the first kick-off meeting.
5. EVALUATION AND CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS
5.1. INITIAL SCREENING
All RFP responses will undergo an initial review to determine responsiveness to the instructions herein. Those RFP responses initially determined to be responsive by meeting the RFP requirement as indicated herein will proceed to the next phase of the evaluation process.
5.2. EVALUATION ACTIVITIES
Item #13. Page 56
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 202
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
RFP responses deemed as having met the standard RFP requirements as indicated herein are then evaluated by an Evaluation Committee. The RFP submittals are scored and assigned a ranking of one (1) through ten (10), ten being the highest possible score. The following criteria have been assigned percentages that the criteria will be scored against, based upon but not limited to the following evaluation criteria factors:
Criteria
Criteria Description
Assigned
Percentage
Consultant Expertise 15%
Quality of proposed services or goods 15%
Extent to which the Consultants services or goods meet the City ’s needs
15%
Cost 10%
Consultant’s understanding of the City’s Scope of Services and overall quality of work plan; logic, clarity, and deliverables 20% Consultant’s management approach and organization of the team including communication, scheduling, and budget control 15%
Past performance with other government entities/clients with respect to control of costs, quality of work, and meeting deadlines 10%
5.3. COST EVALUATION
Cost Proposals are evaluated and scored based on the following calculations; Score = Lowest Proposal Cost / Cost of Proposal being scored X Maximum Points Available (10) The score is then added to the spreadsheet criteria scores.
5.4. REFERENCE CHECKS
If determined to be required reference checks are conducted by the Procurement Division and the requesting department may or may not be present during the process. The reference checks may be conducted by phone with the information being scribed or conducted by a written form, submitted to the Consultant’s reference contact. Reference contacts will be asked several predetermined questions for response and to provide a score from one (1) to ten (10), ten being the highest. Scores are then tabulated and added to the spreadsheet with the criteria scores. It is imperative that Consultants provide up to date and accurate information regarding contact information for reference checks. All scores are then tabulated into the final Consultant ranking.
Item #13. Page 57
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 203
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
Evaluators do not see the Consultant References or pricing line items. The proposed pricing is evaluated by the Procurement Division during the initial review of the RFP response, only to ensure that the proposed cost is not over the City ’s budgeted amount or Not-to-Exceed amount for the project.
5.5. DEMONSTRATIONS/ INTERVIEWS
Upon completion of the RFP evaluations and data analysis, and only, if necessary, selected top ranked Consultants will be provided an opportunity to interview and conduct a demonstration or presentation to further expand on their RFP response. Consultant interviews/demonstrations are scored and assigned a ranking of one (1) through ten (10), ten being the highest possible score, based upon but not limited to the evaluation criteria factors as stated within the RFP.
5.6. FINANCIAL DOCUMENTATION
Consultants that proceed to the short-list may be required to submit financial documentation as proof of its firm’s financial stability and strength. A financial review will be conducted by the City Finance Department.
Should a Consultant wish for its financial documentation to be treated as proprietary or be returned upon completion of the review, the documentation must clearly be marked as such. The following documentation will be required of each Consultant on the short-list:
• A copy of the Consultant’s most recent annual report. • Audited (by a third party), balance sheets and income statements for the past three (3) years. • If audited data is not available, Consultant shall submit copies of complete tax returns for the past three (3) years.
• Describe any regulatory censure and past or pending litigation related to services provided by the Consultant.
• Indicate all applicable information regarding Consultant ownership changes in the last three (3) years.
5.7. BEST AND FINAL OFFER
Upon completion of Consultant presentations, the City reserves the right to conduct pre-award discussions and/or pre-contract negotiations with all or only top ranked Consultants. At which time the City may request a Best and Final Offer to be submitted from one or all finalists.
5.8. CONSULTANT SELECTION
The final Consultant selection is based on which Consultant is the most responsive, meeting the City ’s requirements, offering the best value at the most competitive price. The City is not obligated to award to the lowest price proposal.
Item #13. Page 58
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 204
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
The City may conduct negotiations with several Consultants simultaneously. The City may also negotiate contract terms with the selected Consultants prior to award. The City, at its sole discretion, reserves the right, unless otherwise stated, to accept or reject all or any RFP responses, or any part thereof, either separately or to waive any informality and to split or make the award in any manner determined to be in the best interest of the City.
5.9. LETTER OF INTENT TO AWARD
After a final Consultant selection is determined, a Letter of Intent to Award (LOI) will be posted for review by all participating, responsive Consultants. Negotiations shall be confidential and not subject to disclosure to competing Consultants unless an agreement is reached. If contract negotiations cannot be concluded successfully, City may negotiate a contract with the next highest scoring Consultant or withdraw the RFP entirely.
Item #13. Page 59
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 205
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
“EXHIBIT A, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONFLICT OF INTEREST/NON-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT” It is the policy of the City to prevent personal or organizational conflict of interest, or the appearance of such conflict of interest, in the award and administration of City Contracts, including, but not limited to Contracts for Professional Services Agreements (“PSA”) with potential Consultants.
I do not have specific knowledge of confidential information regarding RFP responses received in response to the Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011 for The Development Of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan.
I agree not to disclose or otherwise divulge any information pertaining to the contents, status, or ranking of any RFP response to anyone. I understand the terms and "disclose or otherwise divulge" to include, but are not limited to, verbal conversations, written correspondence, reproduction of any part or any portion of any RFP response, or removal of same from designated areas.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the following statements are true and correct and that I understand and agree to be bound by commitments contained herein.
______________________________________ (Print Name)
______________________________________ (Relationship to the City)
______________________________________ (Relationship to the Consultants)
______________________________________ (Signature)
______________________________________ (Date)
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – H.
Item #13. Page 60
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 206
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
“EXHIBIT B, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT EXCEPTIONS SUMMARY” Mark the appropriate choice, below:
_____ Consultants accepts the PSA without exception.
OR
_____ Consultants proposes exceptions to the PSA.
Summarize all exceptions on a separate document. Enclose a written summary of each change and title as “Exception Summary”, which shall include the Consultants’ rationale for proposing each such exception. Each exception must be labeled with the Section number in the PSA. Failure to properly reference exceptions in the submitted summary may deem the response as non-responsive. ___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – H.
Item #13. Page 61
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 207
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
“EXHIBIT C, ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND CERTIFICATION OF ABILITY TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN COVERAGES SPECIFIED”
I, _______________________________ the ______________________________________________ (President, Secretary, Manager, Owner or Representative) of __________________________________________________________________, certify that the (Name of Company, Corporation or Owner)
Specifications and General Provisions regarding insurance requirements as stated within the Professional Services Agreement (PSA), for the Purchase Contract designated Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #19/20-021 for Hazardous Waste Removal, Remediation and Disposal Services On an As Needed Basis have been read and understood and that our Consultants is able to provide and maintain the coverage as specified in the PSA.
Failure to provide said coverage, upon request to finalize the PSA prior to award shall be enough cause for immediate disqualification of award. Failure to maintain said coverage shall result in termination of the contract.
___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – H.
Item #13. Page 62
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 208
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
“EXHIBIT D, ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT”
The Consultants hereby acknowledges the following Addenda Number(s) to this RFP have been received, if any.
Consultants understands failure to acknowledge any addenda issued may cause the RFP response to be considered non-responsive. It is the Consultants’ responsibility to log into the Bid System to identify and download the number of addenda that have been posted.
• __________________
• __________________
• __________________
• __________________
___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – H.
Item #13. Page 63
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 209
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
“EXHIBIT E, DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION CERTIFICATION FORM” I certify that neither _____________________________ (Consultant) nor any of its proposed subcontractors are not currently listed on the governmentwide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the guidelines under 2 CFR 200 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), and that neither Consultant nor any of its proposed subcontractors are tax delinquent with the State of California.
I acknowledge that if Consultants or any of its subcontractors subsequently are placed under suspension or debarment by a local, state or federal government entity, or if Consultants or any of its subcontractors subsequently become delinquent in California taxes, our Proposal will be disqualified. ___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – H.
Item #13. Page 64
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 210
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
“EXHIBIT F, PARTICIPATION CLAUSE”
It is hereby understood that other government entities, such as cities, counties, and special/school districts may utilize this RFP response at their option for equipment or services at the RFP response price for a period of ________ days. Said entities shall have the option to participate in any award made because of this solicitation.
Any such piggy-back awards will be made independently by each agency, and the City is not an agent, partner or representative of these agencies and is not obligated or liable for any action of debts that may arise out of such independently negotiated piggy-back procurement. Each public agency shall accept sole responsibility of its own order placement and payments of the Consultants.
Successful Consultants will extend prices as proposed herein to other governmental agencies, please specify.
YES __________ NO _________
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – H.
Item #13. Page 65
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 211
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
“EXHIBIT G, SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY”
The undersigned firm declares that he has carefully examined the specifications and read the above terms and conditions, and hereby proposes and agrees, if this RFP response is accepted, to furnish all material in accordance with the specifications and instructions, in the time and manner therein prescribed for the unit cost amounts set forth in the following RFP response.
THE CONSULTANT IN SUBMITTING THIS RFP RESPONSE MUST FILL IN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY DEEM YOUR RFP RESPONSE AS NON-RESPONSIVE.
Company Name: Address:
(Street, Su. # City, State, Zip)
Telephone #:
Fax #:
E-mail address: Web Address:
Authorized Representative: (print) Title:
Signature: Date:
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – H.
Item #13. Page 66
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 212
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
“EXHIBIT H” REFERENCES WORKSHEET
The following References Worksheet must be complete, please do not mark “See Attached”. Provide a minimum of four (4) clients that are similar in size to the City of Rancho Cucamonga that your company has conducted comparable or like services. Preferred references should be government agencies and be a current customer within the past three (3) years. Please verify accuracy of contact information.
Reference 1
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Reference 2
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Item #13. Page 67
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 213
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
Reference 3
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Reference 4
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – H.
`
Item #13. Page 68
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 214
DATE: November 2, 2022
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Mike McCliman, Fire Chief
Jeff Benson, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Superintendent Ruth Cain, CPPB, Procurement Manager
SUBJECT: Consideration to Award a Contract to DUDEK for the Preparation of an Urban Forest Management Plan in an Amount Not to Exceed $250,000. (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District accept the proposals received, award and authorize the execution of a contract in the amount not to exceed $250,000 for the preparation of an Urban Forest Management Plan to DUDEK of Pasadena, to be funded from various City and Special District accounts.
BACKGROUND:
The City is responsible for overseeing the care and maintenance of approximately 77,000 trees within its borders. To address the magnitude of all that is involved in managing the urban forest presently and in the future, staff determined there is a need for a comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP). This plan represents a cross-departmental initiative that will build on planning efforts such as the General Plan, the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan, and the Climate Action Plan.
City staff will work closely with the consultant to prepare the UFMP which will analyze and provide recommendations for items such as: tree ordinances, the city’s tree inventory, a tree canopy analysis, identification of the current health of the urban forest, and location specific species goals for existing and future development. The UFMP will assist City staff with incorporating urban forest management best practices, including setting greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction goals, wildfire prevention, long-term City tree canopy cover goals, and establish maintenance practices for commercial trees. The canopy analysis will also identify opportunities for urban forest expansion for both public and private trees. This document will further identify reforestation solutions to address replacing trees that are reaching the end of their life span. The UFMP will be led by a science-based, community-driven process. The consultant and City staff will facilitate community engagement activities such as surveys, workshops, an urban forest summit, and develop social media posts to solicit advice and feedback on UFMP development and implementation. Presentations to the Planning Commission and City Council will occur to provide updates and progress of the plan. The final and adopted UFMP will provide staff with a long-term Item #13. Page 69
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 215
plan to mitigate future state mandates, drought, urban heat effects, and wildfires, while creating a roadmap for the City’s urban forest over the next 50 years. Having this plan in place will create opportunities for the City to pursue grant opportunities related to climate action initiatives.
The Procurement Division prepared and posted RFP #21/22-011 for preparation of an Urban Forest Management Plan. There were seven hundred fifty-three (753) notified vendors; thirty-two (32) prospective bidders downloaded or viewed the bid package, and three (3) responses were received.
ANALYSIS:
An Evaluation Committee consisting of City staff from departments that will benefit from the UFMP conducted a thorough analysis of the RFP responses and scored and ranked the proposals in accordance with the RFP evaluation criteria. The top two (2) highest ranked vendors were invited to be interviewed and provided an opportunity to present additional information to enhance their proposal submittals. Vendors were evaluated and rated based on their presentation and responses to pre-determined questions from the Evaluation Committee.
DUDEK was the highest ranking and was determined to be the most responsive vendor providing the best value while meeting the scope of services listed in the RFP. Therefore, staff recommends City Council award a contract to DUDEK of Pasadena, California, effective November 2, 2022, in an amount not to exceed $250,000. DUDEK will have 15 months to complete and deliver the UFMP along with assisting staff with modifications to the municipal code as required. A copy of the contract is on file in the City Clerk’s Office.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Fiscal Year 2022/23 adopted budget for this project is $250,000 to be funded from various City and Special District accounts. The completion of the Urban Forest Management Plan will enable City staff to prepare future budgets based on the findings and recommendations made within the plan.
The chart below has been prepared to illustrate the funding break down from the various Fire District, City, and Special District accounts considering the number of trees in each Special District.
Funding Breakdown
Org Key Object Location Tree Count Percentage Amount
1001319 5310 GF 21,142 27.46% $ 41,180
1016301 5310 Econ/Com Dev. $ 50,000
1130303 5310 LMD 1 12,928 16.78% $ 25,180
1131303 5310 LMD 2 16,164 20.99% $ 31,490
1133303 5310 LMD 3B 1,587 2.06% $ 3,090
1133320 5310 Metrolink 372 0.48% $ 720
1134303 5310 LMD 4 4,931 6.40% $ 9,610
1136303 5310 LMD 6 3,867 5.02% $ 7,530
1137303 5310 LMD 7 7,608 9.88% $ 14,820
Item #13. Page 70
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 216
1138303 5310 LMD 8 637 0.83% $ 1,240
1139303 5310 LMD 9 3,317 4.31% $ 6,460
1140303 5310 LMD 10 2,105 2.73% $ 4,100
1848303 5310 Heritage 523 0.68% $ 1,020
1848303 5310 Red Hill 542 0.70% $ 1,060
1868203 5310 CFD 200-03 268 0.35% $ 520
1700312 5310 Sports Complex 1,017 1.32% $ 1,980
3288501 5310 Fire District $ 50,000
Grand Total 77,005 100.00% $ 250,000
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:
This item addresses the City Council’s Core Values of providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all while promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community through an Urban Forrest Management Plan.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Item #13. Page 71
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 217
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
DUDEK
CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT
OF A
COMPREHENSIVE URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN
AWARD DATE:
November 2, 2022
City of Rancho Cucamonga
CONTRACT NUMBER
2022-141
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 72
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 218
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non-design) Vendor Initials Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 1
AGREEMENT FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 2nd day of November 2022, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Dudek, an environmental and engineering consulting firm (“Consultant”).
RECITALS
A. City has heretofore issued its request for proposals to perform the following professional services: Consultant services for the development of a comprehensive urban forest management plan (“the Project”).
B. Consultant has submitted a proposal to perform the professional services described in Recital “A”, above, necessary to complete the Project.
C. City desires to engage Consultant to complete the Project in the manner set forth and more fully described herein.
D. Consultant represents that it is fully qualified and licensed under the laws of the State of California to perform the services contemplated by this Agreement in a good and professional manner.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the mutual promises, covenants, and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Consultant’s Services.
1.1 Scope and Level of Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, City hereby engages Consultant to perform all technical and professional services described in Recitals “A” and “B” above, including, but not limited to developing a robust Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP), tree ordinances, city tree inventory, tree canopy analysis, and location-specific species policies, all as more fully set forth in the Consultant’s proposal, dated May 23, 2022 and entitled “Scope of Work”, attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, and incorporated by reference herein. The nature, scope, and level of the services required to be performed by Consultant are set forth in the Scope of Work and are referred to herein as “the Services.” In the event of any inconsistencies between the Scope of Work and this Agreement, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall control.
1.2 Revisions to Scope of Work. Upon request of the City, the Consultant will promptly meet with City staff to discuss any revisions to the Project desired by the City. Consultant agrees that the Scope of Work may be amended based upon said DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 73
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 219
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non-design) Vendor Initials Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 2
meetings, and, by amendment to this Agreement, the parties may agree on a revision or revisions to Consultant’s compensation based thereon. A revision pursuant to this Section that does not increase the total cost payable to Consultant by more than ten percent (10%) of the total compensation specified in Section 3, may be approved in writing by City’s City Manager without amendment.
1.3 Time for Performance. Consultant shall perform all services under this Agreement in a timely, regular basis consistent with industry standards for professional skill and care, and in accordance with any schedule of performance set forth in the Scope of Work, or as set forth in a “Schedule of Performance”, if such Schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit “ ”.
1.4 Standard of Care. As a material inducement to City to enter into this Agreement, Consultant hereby represents that it has the experience necessary to undertake the services to be provided. In light of such status and experience, Consultant hereby covenants that it shall follow the customary professional standards in performing the Services.
1.5 Familiarity with Services. By executing this Agreement, Consultant represents that, to the extent required by the standard of practice, Consultant (a) has investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (b) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement.
Consultant represents that Consultant, to the extent required by the standard of practice, has investigated any areas of work, as applicable, and is reasonably acquainted with the conditions therein. Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of services, Consultant shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s risk until written instructions are received from the City Representative.
2. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall be two year(s) and shall become effective as of the date of the mutual execution by way of both parties signature (the “Effective Date”). No work shall be conducted; service or goods will not be provided until this Agreement has been executed and requirements have been fulfilled.
Parties to this Agreement shall have the option to renew in one year(s) incrementsto a total of three additional years, unless sooner terminated as provided in Section 14 herein.
Options to renew are contingent upon the City Manager’s approval, subject to pricing review, and in accordance to all Terms and Conditions stated herein unless otherwise provided in writing by the City.
3. Compensation.
3.1 Compensation. City shall compensate Consultant as set forth in Exhibit A, provided, however, that full, total and complete amount payable to Consultant shall not exceed $250,000 (two hundred fifty thousand dollars), including all out of pocket expenses, unless additional compensation is approved by the City Manager or City DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 74
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 220
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non-design) Vendor Initials Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 3
Council. City shall not withhold any federal, state or other taxes, or other deductions.
However, City shall withhold not more than ten percent (10%) of any invoice amount pending receipt of any deliverables reflected in such invoice. Under no circumstance shall Consultant be entitled to compensation for services not yet satisfactorily performed.
The parties further agree that compensation may be adjusted in accordance with Section 1.2 to reflect subsequent changes to the Scope of Services. City shall compensate Consultant for any authorized extra services as set forth in Exhibit A.
4. Method of Payment.
4.1 Invoices. Consultant shall submit to City monthly invoices for the Services performed pursuant to this Agreement. The invoices shall describe in detail the Services rendered during the period and shall separately describe any authorized extra services. Any invoice claiming compensation for extra services shall include appropriate documentation of prior authorization of such services. All invoices shall be remitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
4.2 City shall review such invoices and notify Consultant in writing within ten (10) business days of any disputed amounts.
4.3 City shall pay all undisputed portions of the invoice within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the invoice up to the not-to-exceed amounts set forth in Section 3.
4.4 All records, invoices, time cards, cost control sheets and other records maintained by Consultant relating to services hereunder shall be available for review and audit by the City.
5. Representatives.
5.1 City Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, the contract administrator and City’s representative shall be William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director, or such other person as designated in writing by the City (“City Representative”). It shall be Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the City Representative is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services, and Consultant shall refer any decisions that must be made by City to the City Representative.
Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the City Representative.
5.2 Consultant Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, Joseph Monaco, AICP, President/CEO is hereby designated as the principal and representative of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith (“Consultant’s Representative”). It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the Consultant’s Representative were a substantial inducement for City to DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 75
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 221
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non-design) Vendor Initials Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 4
enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the Consultant’s Representative shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. Consultant may not change the Responsible Principal without the prior written approval of City.
6. Consultant’s Personnel.
6.1 All Services shall be performed by Consultant or under Consultant’s direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications, permits, and licenses required by State and local law to perform such Services, including, without limitation, a City business license as required by the City’s Municipal Code.
6.2 Consultant shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged in performing the Services and compliance with the standard of care set forth in Section 1.4.
6.3 Consultant shall be responsible for payment of all employees’ and subcontractors’ wages and benefits, and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer’s liability, workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social Security. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.
6.4 Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and its elected officials, officers and employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, from any and all liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from Consultant’s violations of personnel practices and/or any violation of the California Labor Code. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant’s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section 6.
7. Ownership of Work Product.
7.1 Ownership. All documents, ideas, concepts, electronic files, drawings, photographs and any and all other writings, including drafts thereof, prepared, created or provided by Consultant in the course of performing the Services, including any and all intellectual and proprietary rights arising from the creation of the same (collectively, “Work Product”), are considered to be “works made for hire” for the benefit of the City.
Upon payment being made, and provided Consultant is not in breach of this Agreement, all Work Product shall be and remain the property of City without restriction or limitation upon its use or dissemination by City. Basic survey notes, sketches, charts, computations and similar data prepared or obtained by Consultant under this Agreement shall, upon request, be made available to City. None of the Work Product shall be the subject of any DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 76
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 222
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non-design) Vendor Initials Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 5
common law or statutory copyright or copyright application by Consultant. In the event of the return of any of the Work Product to Consultant or its representative, Consultant shall be responsible for its safe return to City. Under no circumstances shall Consultant fail to deliver any draft or final designs, plans, drawings, reports or specifications to City upon written demand by City for their delivery, notwithstanding any disputes between Consultant and City concerning payment, performance of the contract, or otherwise. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement. City’s reuse of the Work Product for any purpose other than the Project, shall be at City’s sole risk.
7.2. Assignment of Intellectual Property Interests: Upon execution of this Agreement and to the extent not otherwise conveyed to City by Section 7.1, above, the Consultant shall be deemed to grant and assign to City, and shall require all of its subcontractors to assign to City, all ownership rights, and all common law and statutory copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual and proprietary property rights relating to the Work Product and the Project itself, and Consultant shall disclaim and retain no rights whatsoever as to any of the Work Product, to the maximum extent permitted by law. City shall be entitled to utilize the Work Product for any and all purposes, including but not limited to constructing, using, maintaining, altering, adding to, restoring, rebuilding and publicizing the Project or any aspect of the Project.
7.3 Title to Intellectual Property. Consultant warrants and represents that it has secured all necessary licenses, consents or approvals to use any instrumentality, thing or component as to which any intellectual property right exists, including computer software, used in the rendering of the Services and the production of the Work Product and/or materials produced under this Agreement, and that City has full legal title to and the right to reproduce any of the Work Product. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, harmless from any loss, claim or liability in any way related to a claim that City’s use is violating federal, state or local laws, or any contractual provisions, relating to trade names, licenses, franchises, patents or other means of protecting intellectual property rights and/or interests in products or inventions. Consultant shall bear all costs arising from the use of patented, copyrighted, trade secret or trademarked documents, materials, software, equipment, devices or processes used or incorporated in the Services and materials produced under this Agreement. In the event City’s use of any of the Work Product is held to constitute an infringement and any use thereof is enjoined, Consultant, at its expense, shall: (a) secure for City the right to continue using the Work Product by suspension of any injunction or by procuring a license or licenses for City; or (b) modify the Work Product so that it becomes non- infringing. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
8. Status as Independent Contractor. Consultant is, and shall at all times remain as to City, a wholly independent contractor. Consultant shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act as an agent of City.
Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 77
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 223
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non-design) Vendor Initials Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 6
or any of Consultant’s employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its officers, agents or employees are in any manner employees of City. Consultant shall pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Consultant under this Agreement, and to defend, indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement.
Consultant shall fully comply with the workers’ compensation law regarding Consultant and Consultant’s employees.
9. Confidentiality. Consultant may have access to financial, accounting, statistical, and personnel data of individuals and City employees. Consultant covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement are confidential and shall not be disclosed by Consultant without prior written authorization by City. City shall grant such authorization if applicable law requires disclosure. All City data shall be returned to City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant’s covenant under this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. This provision shall not apply to information in whatever form that is in the public domain, nor shall it restrict the Consultant from giving notices required by law or complying with an order to provide information or data when such an order is issued by a court, administrative agency or other legitimate authority, or if disclosure is otherwise permitted by law and reasonably necessary for the Consultant to defend itself from any legal action or claim.
10. Conflict of Interest.
10.1 Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which may be affected by the Services, or which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Consultant further covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Consultant shall avoid the appearance of having any interest, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services.
Consultant shall not accept any employment or representation during the term of this Agreement which is or may likely make Consultant “financially interested” (as provided in California Government Code §§1090 and 87100) in any decision made by City on any matter in connection with which Consultant has been retained.
10.2 Consultant further represents that it has not employed or retained any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant, to solicit or obtain this Agreement. Consultant has not paid or agreed to pay any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant, any fee, commission, gift, percentage, or any other consideration contingent upon the execution of this Agreement. Upon any breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right, at its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate this Agreement without further liability, or to deduct from any sums payable to Consultant hereunder the full amount or value of any such fee, commission, percentage or gift.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 78
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 224
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non-design) Vendor Initials Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 7
10.3 Consultant has no knowledge that any officer or employee of City has any interest, whether contractual, noncontractual, financial, proprietary, or otherwise, in this transaction or in the business of Consultant, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of Consultant at any time during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall immediately make a complete, written disclosure of such interest to City, even if such interest would not be deemed a prohibited “conflict of interest” under applicable laws as described in subsection 10.1.
11. Indemnification.
11.1 Professional Services. In the connection with its professional services, the Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, (collectively, “Indemnitees”), free and harmless with respect to any and all damages, liabilities, losses, reasonable defense costs or expenses (collectively, “Claims”), including but not limited to liability for death or injury to any person and injury to any property, to the extent the same arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants, or agents in the performance of its professional services under this Agreement. Consultant shall pay all reasonable defense costs and expenses, including actual reasonable attorney’s fees and experts’ costs incurred in connection with such defense. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to any professional liability claim or lawsuit, this indemnity does not include providing the primary defense of City, provided, however, Consultant shall be responsible for City’s defense costs to the extent such costs are incurred as a result of Consultant’s negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct.
11.2 Other Indemnities. In connection with all Claims not covered by Section 11.1, and to the maximum extent permitted by law, the Consultant shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify the Indemnitees with respect to any and all Claims including but not limited to Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the acts, omissions, activities or operations of Consultant or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, subconsultants, or agents in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall defend Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any such Claims with counsel of City’s choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including actual attorney’s fees and experts’ costs incurred in connection with such defense. The indemnification obligation herein shall not in any way be limited by the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement provided, however, that the Contractor shall have no obligation to indemnify for Claims arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of any of the Indemnitees.
11.3 Nonwaiver of Rights. Indemnitees do not, and shall not, waive any rights that they may possess against Consultant because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement.
11.4 Waiver of Right of Subrogation. Except as otherwise expressly DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 79
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 225
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non-design) Vendor Initials Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 8
provided in this Agreement, Consultant, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation against the Indemnitees, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant.
11.5 Survival. The provisions of this Section 11 shall survive the termination of the Agreement and are in addition to any other rights or remedies which Indemnitees may have under the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to an Indemnitee’s right to recover under this indemnity provision, and an entry of judgment against Consultant shall be conclusive in favor of the Indemnitee’s right to recover under this indemnity provision.
12. Insurance.
12.1 Liability Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the services hereunder by Consultant, and/or its agents, representatives, employees and subcontractors.
12.2 Minimum Scope of Insurance. Unless otherwise approved by City, coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001).
(2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3) Worker’s Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, and Employer’s Liability Insurance.
(4) Professional Liability insurance in a form approved by the City, having, at City’s option, an extended reporting period of not less than three (3) years; or professional liability insurance shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after completion of the Services which shall, during the entire three (3) year period, provide protection against claims of professional negligence arising out of Consultant’s
performance of the Services and otherwise complying with all applicable provisions of this Section 12. The policy shall be endorsed to include contractual liability to the extent insurable.
12.3 Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 80
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 226
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non-design) Vendor Initials Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 9
(1) Commercial General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.
Commercial General Liability Insurance with a general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement or the general limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: $2,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
(3) Employer’s Liability: $1,000,000 per accident and in the aggregate for bodily injury or disease and Workers’
Compensation Insurance in the amount required by law.
(4) Professional Liability: $1,000,000 per claim/aggregate. (5) The Insurance obligations under this agreement shall be the greater of (i) the Insurance coverages and limits carried by the Contractor; or (ii) the minimum insurance requirements shown in this Agreement. Any insurance proceeds in excess of the specified limits and coverage required which are applicable to a given loss, shall be available to the City. No representation is made that the minimum insurance
requirements of this Agreement are sufficient to cover the obligations of the Contractor under this Agreement.
12.4 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or selfinsured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City and shall not reduce the limits of coverage. City reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any required insurance policy and endorsements.
12.5 Other Insurance Provisions.
(1) The commercial general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain the following provisions on a separate additionally insured endorsement naming the City, its
officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of Consultant; products and completed operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by Consultant; and/or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant. The
coverage shall contain no limitations on the scope of
protection afforded to City, its officers, officials,
employees, designated volunteers or
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 81
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 227
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non-design) Vendor Initials Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 10
agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials which are not also limitations applicable to the named insured.
(2) For any claims related to this Agreement, Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City or officials. Any insurance or self- insurance
maintained by City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as independent
contractors in the role of City officials shall be excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.
(4) Contractor shall provide immediate written notice if (1) any of the required insurance policies is terminated; (2) the limits of any of the required polices are reduced; (3) or the
deductible or self insured retention is increased. In the event of any cancellation or reduction in coverage or limits of any insurance, Contractor shall forthwith obtain and submit proof of substitute insurance. Should Contractor fail to immediately procure other insurance, as specified, to
substitute for any canceled policy, the City may procure such insurance at Contractor’s sole cost and expense.
(5) Each insurance policy, required by this clause shall expressly waive the insurer’s right of subrogation against City and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials.
(6) Each policy shall be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by City, which is admitted and licensed to do business in the State of California and which is rated A:VII or better according to the most recent A.M. Best Co.
Rating Guide.
(7) Each policy shall specify that any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the required policy, including breaches of warranty, shall not affect the coverage required to be provided.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 82
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 228
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non-design) Vendor Initials Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 11
(8) Each policy shall specify that any and all costs of adjusting and/or defending any claim against any insured, including court costs and attorneys' fees, shall be paid in addition to and shall not deplete any policy limits.
(9) Contractor shall provide any and all other required insurance, endorsements, or exclusions as required by the City in any request for proposals applicable to this Agreement.
12.6 Evidence of coverage. Prior to commencing performance under this Agreement, the Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates and original endorsements, or copies of each required policy, effecting and evidencing the insurance coverage required by this Agreement including (1) Additional Insured Endorsement(s), (2) Worker’s Compensation waiver of subrogation endorsement, and (3) General liability declarations or endorsement page listing all policy endorsements. The endorsements shall be signed by a person authorized by the insurer(s) to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements or policies shall be received and approved by the City before Consultant commences performance. If performance of this Agreement shall extend beyond one year, Consultant shall provide City with the required policies or endorsements evidencing renewal of the required policies of insurance prior to the expiration of any required policies of insurance.
12.7 Contractor agrees to include in all contracts with all subcontractors performing work pursuant to this Agreement, the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement including the indemnity and insurance requirements to the extent they apply to the scope of any such subcontractor’s work. Contractor shall require its subcontractors to be bound to Contractor and City in the same manner and to the same extent as Contractor is bound to City pursuant to this Agreement, and to require each of its subcontractors to include these same provisions in its contract with any sub- subcontractor.
13. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to Consultant’s performance or services rendered under this Agreement, Consultant shall render any reasonable assistance and cooperation that City might require.
City shall compensate Consultant for any litigation support services in an amount to be agreed upon by the parties.
14. Termination. City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any time for any or no reason on not less than ten (10) days prior written notice to Consultant.
In the event City exercises its right to terminate this Agreement, City shall pay Consultant for any services satisfactorily rendered prior to the effective date of the termination, provided Consultant is not then in breach of this Agreement. Consultant shall have no other claim against City by reason of such termination, including any claim for compensation.
City may terminate for cause following a default remaining uncured more than five (5) business days after service of a notice to cure on the breaching party.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 83
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 229
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non-design) Vendor Initials Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 12
Consultant may terminate this Agreement for cause upon giving the City ten (10) business days prior written notice for any of the following: (1) uncured breach by the City of any material term of this Agreement, including but not limited to Payment Terms; (2) material changes in the conditions under which this Agreement was entered into, coupled with the failure of the parties to reach accord on the fees and charges for any Additional Services required because of such changes.
15. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports authorized or required by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed received on (a) the day of delivery if delivered by hand or overnight courier service during Consultant’s and City’s regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses set forth in this Section, or to such other addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing pursuant to the provisions of this Section.
All notices shall be addressed as follows:
If to City: William Wittkopf
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Public Works Services Department 8794
Lion Street
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
If to Contractor: Joseph Monaco, AICP, President/CEO
Dudek
605 Third Street
Encinitas, California 92024
16. Non-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity. In the performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee, subcontractor, or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that subcontractors and applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation.
17. Assignment and Subcontracting. Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement or subcontract the performance of any of Consultant’s obligations hereunder without City’s prior written consent. Except as provided herein, any attempt by Consultant to so assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shall be null, void and of no effect. 18 Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations in force at the time DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 84
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 230
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non-design) Vendor Initials Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 13
Consultant performs the Services. CONSULTANT is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, CONSULTANT agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. The applicable prevailing wage rate determinations can be found at http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm CONSULTANT shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant’s principal place of business and at the Project site. CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.
19. Non-Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other condition of performance under this Agreement. In no event shall the making by City of any payment to Consultant constitute or be construed as a waiver by City of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist on the part of Consultant, and the making of any such payment by City shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to City with regard to such breach or default.
20. Attorney’s Fees. In the event that either party to this Agreement shall commence any legal action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of experts.
21. Exhibits; Precedence. All documents referenced as exhibits in this Agreement are hereby incorporated in this Agreement. In the event of any material discrepancy between the express provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of any document incorporated herein by reference, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail.
22. Applicable Law and Venue. The validity, interpretation, and performance of this Agreement shall be controlled by and construed under the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action relating to this Agreement shall be in the San Bernardino County Superior Court.
23. Construction. In the event of any asserted ambiguity in, or dispute regarding the interpretation of any matter herein, the interpretation of this Agreement shall not be resolved by any rules of interpretation providing for interpretation against the DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 85
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 231
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non-design) Vendor Initials Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 14
party who causes the uncertainty to exist or against the party who drafted the Agreement or who drafted that portion of the Agreement.
24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement consists of this document, and any other documents, attachments and/or exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto, each of which is incorporated herein by such reference, and the same represents the entire and integrated agreement between Consultant and City. This Agreement supersedes all prior oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the parties which expressly refers to this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.
Dudek
By:
Name Date
Title
City of Rancho Cucamonga
By:
Name Date
Title
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 President
11/14/2022 | 8:52 AM PST 11/15/2022 | 5:16 PM PST
Mayor/President
Item #13. Page 86
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 232
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non-design) Vendor Initials Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 15
ATTACHMENTS
• Attachment A – Sample Additional Insured Endorsement, Ongoing Operations • Attachment B – Sample Additional Insured Endorsement, Completed Operations • Attachment C – Sample Waiver of Subrogation
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 87
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 233
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non-design) Vendor Initials Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 16
Attachment A – Sample Additional Insured Endorsement, Ongoing Operations DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 88
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 234
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non-design) Vendor Initials Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 17
Attachment B – Sample Additional Insured Endorsement, Completed Operations DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 89
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 235
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non-design) Vendor Initials Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 18
Attachment C – Sample Waiver of Subrogation
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 90
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 236
PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non-design) Vendor Initials Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 19
SCOPE OF WORK
Scope of Work Contents:
• Exhibit A – RFP 21/22-011
• Exhibit B – Contractor’s proposal, dated May 23, 2022 • Exhibit C – Unit Costs (Best and Final Offer)
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 91
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 237
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (“RFP”) #21/22-011
FOR
CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPREHENSIVE
URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Procurement Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 92
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 238
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
Table of Contents
1. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................ 5
1.1. GENERAL BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................. 5
1.2. PROPOSAL DELIVERY AND SCHEDULE OF EVENTS ............................................................................................. 5
1.3. DISCREPANCIES OR OMISSIONS .................................................................................................................... 5
1.4. CONTINGENCIES ........................................................................................................................................ 6
1.5. QUESTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS ................................................................................................................. 6
1.6. DISPOSITION OF MATERIAL AND CONFIDENTIAL OR PROPRIETARY INFORMATION ................................................. 6
1.7. BRAND NAMES ......................................................................................................................................... 6
1.8. KNOWLEDGE OF REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................................. 7
1.9. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS ............................................................................................................................ 7
1.10. CALIFORNIA'S PUBLIC RECORDS ACT ............................................................................................................. 8
2. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................................. 8
2.1. BUSINESS LICENSE ...................................................................................................................................... 8
2.2. PREVAILING WAGES ................................................................................................................................... 8
2.3. REPRESENTATIVES ...................................................................................................................................... 9
2.4. EMPLOYEE CONDUCT................................................................................................................................ 10
3. RFP RESPONSE FORMAT AND SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS ........................................................... 10
3.1. COVER LETTER / INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 11
3.2. TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................ 11
3.3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. 11
3.4. EXPERIENCE ............................................................................................................................................ 11
3.5. THIRD-PARTY / SUBCONTRACTORS ............................................................................................................. 11
3.6. STAFF BIOGRAPHIES ................................................................................................................................. 12
3.7. PROPOSAL RESPONSE ............................................................................................................................... 12
3.8. EXHIBITS A THROUGH H ............................................................................................................................ 12
3.9. NON-DISCLOSURE CONFLICT OF INTEREST .................................................................................................... 12
3.10. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT .......................................................................................................... 13
3.11. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INSURANCE .......................................................................................................... 13 DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 93
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 239
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
3.12. ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .............................................................................................................. 13
3.13. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION .................................................................................................................. 13
3.14. PARTICIPATION CLAUSE ............................................................................................................................ 14
3.15. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY ........................................................................................................................ 14
3.16. COMPANY REFERENCES............................................................................................................................. 14
3.17. LINE-ITEM PRICING .................................................................................................................................. 14
4. SCOPE OF SERVICES ................................................................................................................. 14
4.1. PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................................. 14
4.2. CONSULTANT RESPONSIBILITIES AND SCOPE OF WORK ................................................................................... 16
4.2.1. TREE INVENTORY & CANOPY ANALYSIS SERVICES .......................................................................................... 17
4.2.2. URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN SERVICES ............................................................................................ 17
4.3. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS ...................................................................................................................... 19
4.4. CONTRACT TERM ..................................................................................................................................... 20
5. EVALUATION AND CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS ............................................................. 20
5.1. INITIAL SCREENING ................................................................................................................................... 20
5.2. EVALUATION ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................................................... 20
5.3. COST EVALUATION ................................................................................................................................... 21
5.4. REFERENCE CHECKS .................................................................................................................................. 21
5.5. DEMONSTRATIONS/ INTERVIEWS ............................................................................................................... 22
5.6. FINANCIAL DOCUMENTATION .................................................................................................................... 22
5.7. BEST AND FINAL OFFER ............................................................................................................................. 22
5.8. CONSULTANT SELECTION ........................................................................................................................... 22
5.9. LETTER OF INTENT TO AWARD .................................................................................................................... 23 “EXHIBIT A, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONFLICT OF INTEREST/NON-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT” .... 24 “EXHIBIT B, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT EXCEPTIONS SUMMARY”......................................... 25 “EXHIBIT C, ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND CERTIFICATION OF ABILITY TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN COVERAGES SPECIFIED” ................................................................................. 26 “EXHIBIT D, ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT” ................................................................................... 27 “EXHIBIT E, DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION CERTIFICATION FORM”....................................................... 28 “EXHIBIT F, PARTICIPATION CLAUSE” ..................................................................................................... 29 DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 94
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 240
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
“EXHIBIT G, SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY” ............................................................................................... 30 “EXHIBIT H” REFERENCES WORKSHEET .................................................................................................. 31 DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 95
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 241
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
1. OVERVIEW
1.1. GENERAL BACKGROUND
The City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter “City”) is inviting qualified Consultants (hereinafter “Consultant”) to submit a proposal response for Request for Proposals (“RFP”) #21/22-011 for Consultant Services for The Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan in accordance with the minimum Scope of Services and Specifications indicated herein.
Consultants wishing to participate in the RFP solicitation must be registered as a Consultant on Planet Bids through the City website at https://www.Cityofrc.us/your-government/procurement. Only those responses received from registered Consultants will be accepted. Responses must be submitted by the named Consultant that has downloaded the RFP, this information is indicated in the bid system and provides the ability to tabulate the responses in accordance with the named Consultants. Submitting a response under a Consultant name that does not appear to be on the Prospective Bidders list will be deemed as non-responsive and disqualify said response from further consideration.
1.2. PROPOSAL DELIVERY AND SCHEDULE OF EVENTS
Complete RFP responses must be received electronically via Planet Bids prior to the due date and time specified in the below Schedule of Events. Please note, there will be no paper responses accepted. The City shall not be responsible for any delays by transmission errors.
Schedule of Events
Event Description Date & Time
Post RFP April 20, 2022
Questions Due May 11, 2022, 9:00 am
Addendum Issued May 17, 2022
RFP Response Due Date May 25, 2022, 9:00 am
(The City reserves the right to change schedule of events without prior notice or responsibility to Consultant.)
1.3. DISCREPANCIES OR OMISSIONS
Consultants finding discrepancies or omissions in the RFP or having any doubts as to the meaning or intent of any part thereof shall submit such questions or concerns in writing electronically via Planet Bids. The City bears no responsibility for oral instructions or representations. Addenda to this RFP shall be considered a part of this RFP and shall become part of any final Contract that may be derived from this RFP.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 96
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 242
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
1.4. CONTINGENCIES
This RFP should not be considered as a contract to purchase goods or services but is a Request for Proposal in accordance with the terms and conditions herein and will not necessarily give rise to a Contract. However, RFP responses should be as detailed and complete as possible to facilitate the formation of a contract based on the RFP response(s) that are pursued should the City decide to do so.
Completion of this RFP form and its associated appendices are a requirement. Failure to do so may disqualify your RFP response submittal. Consultants must submit signed RFP responses by the due date and time as specified herein. Consultants will be considered non-responsive if the above requirements are not submitted as requested.
Any scope of services, contingencies, special instruction and/or terms and conditions applicable to this RFP and any purchase order derived thereafter shall be effective as of the issue date of a purchase order for the requested work (the “Effective Date”), and shall remain in full force and effect until sixty (60) days after the City has accepted the work in writing and has made final payment, unless sooner terminated by written agreement signed by both parties.
1.5. QUESTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS
All questions or clarification requests must be submitted directly through the City’s bid system no later than the due date and time indicated in the above Schedule of Events. Answers and/or clarifications will be provided in the form of an Addendum and will be posted for download from the City ’s bid system in accordance with the above “Schedule of Events”.
From the issuance date of this RFP until a Consultant is awarded, Consultants are not permitted to communicate with any City staff or officials regarding this procurement, other than during interviews, demonstrations, and/or site visits, except at the direction of Ruth Cain, CPPB, Procurement Manager, the designated representative of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1.6. DISPOSITION OF MATERIAL AND CONFIDENTIAL OR PROPRIETARY INFORMATION All materials submitted in response to this RFP solicitation will become the property of the City and will be returned only at the City ’s option and at the expense of the Consultant submitting the RFP response. A copy of the RFP response will be retained for official files and become a public record. Any material that a Consultant considers as confidential but does not meet the disclosure exemption requirements of the California Public Records Act may be made available to the public regardless of a notation or markings of confidentiality or otherwise.
1.7. BRAND NAMES
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 97
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 243
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
Any reference to brand names and/or numbers in the solicitation is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive, unless otherwise specified. RFP responses offering equivalent items meeting the standards of quality specified may be considered, unless other specified, providing the RFP response clearly describes the article offered and how it differs from the referenced brand. Unless a Consultant specifies otherwise, it is understood that the Consultant is offering a referenced brand item as specified in the solicitation. The City reserves the right to determine whether a substitute offer is equivalent to and meets the standards of quality indicated by the brand name references, and the City may require the supply of additional descriptive material and a sample.
1.8. KNOWLEDGE OF REQUIREMENTS
The Consultant shall carefully review all documents referenced and made a part of the solicitation document to ensure that all information required to properly respond has been submitted or made available and all requirements are priced in the RFP response. Failure to examine any documents, drawings, specifications, or instructions will be at the Consultant’s sole risk.
Consultants shall be responsible for knowledge of all items and conditions contained in their RFP responses and in this RFP, including any City issued clarifications, modifications, amendments, or addenda. The City will provide notice of any changes and clarifications to perspective Consultants by way of addenda to Planet Bids; however, it is the Consultant’s responsibility to ascertain that the RFP response includes all addenda issued prior to the RFP due date.
1.9. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
The issuance of this RFP does not constitute an agreement by the City that any contract will be entered by the City. The City expressly reserves the right at any time to:
• Waive or correct any defect or informality in any response, RFP, or RFP procedure. • Reject any or all RFPs.
• Reissue a Request for RFPs.
• Prior to submission deadline for RFPs, modify all or any portion of the selection procedures, including deadlines for accepting responses, the specifications or requirements for any materials, equipment or services to be provided under this RFP, or the requirements for contents or format of the RFPs. • The City recognizesthat price is only one of several criteria to be used in judging a product or service, and the City is not legally bound to accept the lowest RFP response. • The City reserves the right to conduct pre-award discussions and/or pre-Contract negotiations with any or all responsive and responsible Consultants who submit RFP responses. • Procure any materials, equipment or services specified in this RFP by any other means. • Determine that no project will be pursued.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 98
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 244
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
• The City reserves the right to inspect the Consultant’s place of business prior to award or at any time during the contract term or any extension thereof, to determine the Consultant’s capabilities and qualifications.
1.10. CALIFORNIA'S PUBLIC RECORDS ACT
The City complies with the California Public Records Act, Government Code Section 6250 et seq, Public records are open to inspection always during the office hours of the state or local agency and every person has a right to inspect any public record, except as hereafter provided. Any reasonably segregable portion of a record shall be available for inspection by any person requesting the record after deletion of the portions that are exempted by law.
Neither an RFP in its entirety, nor proposed prices shall be considered confidential and proprietary.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, companies are hereby notified that all materials submitted in response to this RFP are subject to California's Public Records Act. The City 's receipt, review, evaluation or any other act or omission concerning any such information shall not create an acceptance by the City or any obligation or duty to prevent the disclosure of any such information except as required by Government Code Section 6253.
Companies who submit information they believe should be exempt from disclosure under the Public Records Act shall clearly mark each document as confidential, proprietary or exempt, and state the legal basis for the exemption with supporting citations to the California Code. Pursuant to California Law, if the information is requested under the Public Records Act, the City shall make a final determination if any exemption exists for the City to deny the request and prevent disclosure. The City will withhold such information from public disclosure under the Public Records Act only if the City determines, in its sole discretion, that there is a legal basis to do so.
2. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
2.1. BUSINESS LICENSE
A selected Consultant awarded a contract shall be required to obtain a Rancho Cucamonga Business License no later than five (5) business days from notification of award prior to being issued a Purchase Order. A selected Consultant must possess and maintain all appropriate licenses/certifications necessary in the performance of duties required under this RFP and will provide copies of licenses/certifications immediately upon request throughout the term of the Contract.
2.2. PREVAILING WAGES
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 99
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 245
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
Where labor is required for a public work as a part of any requirement covered by this RFP, pursuant to the provisions of the Labor Code of the State of California and/or the federal Davis-Bacon Act, a selected Consultant(s) shall pay no less than those minimum wages unless an exemption applies. In certain cases, an exemption from the prevailing wage requirement may apply to the scope of work. (See Cal. Labor Code § 1720(c)(1), (5); 42 USC § 5310(a). However, the City makes no representations in this RFP that such an exemption will apply or that prevailing wages will not be required for a scope of work covered by this RFP.
2.3. REPRESENTATIVES
Should a selected Consultant require the services of a third-party to complete the Scope of Services indicated in this RFP, the awarded Consultant will not assign, transfer, convey or otherwise dispose of the contract or its right, title or interest in or to the same, or any part thereof. Any attempt by the awarded Consultant to so assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shall be null, void and of no effect.
The awarded Consultant shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged in performing the Services including Consultant’s subcontractor. All Services shall be performed by the awarded Consultant or under the awarded Consultant’s direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications, permits, and licenses required by state and local law to perform such services.
The awarded Consultant shall be responsible for payment of all employees’ and subcontractors’ wages and benefits and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer’s liability, workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social Security. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the services.
In case of default by the Consultant, the City may take the following actions which shall include but not be limited to; cancellation of any purchase order, procurement of the articles or service from other sources and may deduct from unpaid balance due to the Consultant, or may bill for excess costs so paid, and the prices paid by the City shall be considered the prevailing market prices paid at the time such purchase is made, withholding of payment until final resolution. Cost of transportation, handling, and/or inspection on deliveries, or Consultants for delivery, which do not meet specifications, will be for the account of the Consultant.
City Representative:
For the purposes of this Agreement, the contract administrator and City ’s representative shall be William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director, or such other person as designated in writing by City (“City ’s Representative”). It shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to assure that City ’s Representative is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services, and the Consultant shall refer any decisions that must be DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 100
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 246
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
made to the City Representative. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the City Representative.
Consultant Representative:
The response to this RFP shall designate the representative of the Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith (“Consultant’s Representative”). It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of the Consultant’s Representative will be a substantial inducement for City to enter into an Agreement with the Consultant. Therefore, the Consultant’s Representative shall be responsible during the term of any Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting enough time to personally supervise the services hereunder. The successful Consultant may not change the Consultant’s Representative without the prior written approval of City ’s Representative.
2.4. EMPLOYEE CONDUCT
All Consultant personnel must observe all City regulations in effect at the location where the Services are being conducted. While on City property, the Consultant’s personnel shall be subject to oversight by City staff. Under no circumstances shall the Consultant’s or Consultant’s sub-contractor personnel be deemed as employees of the City. Consultant or Consultant’s subcontractor personnel shall not represent themselves to be employees of the City.
Consultant's personnel will always make their best efforts to be responsive, polite, and cooperative when interacting with representatives of the City and City employees. The Consultant's personnel shall be required to work in a pleasant and professional manner with City employees, outside Consultants and the public. Nothing contained in this RFP shall be construed as granting the Consultant the sole right to supply personal or contractual services required by the City or without the proper City approval and the issuance of a Purchase Order.
3. RFP RESPONSE FORMAT AND SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
Completion of this RFP form and its associated Exhibits are a requirement. To be considered responsive and evaluate RFP responses fairly and completely Consultants must comply with the format and submission requirements set out in this RFP, and provide all information requested. Failure to comply with this instruction will deem said RFP response as non-responsive and will not receive further consideration in the evaluation process.
If only one RFP response is received, the City reserves the right to discard the response, re-bid or proceed with an RFP review and negotiations.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 101
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 247
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
RFP responses are due on the date and time indicated in the above schedule of events. Submittals shall be submitted electronically via Planet Bids; no paper RFP responses will be accepted. RFP responses must include the information required by this RFP.
3.1. COVER LETTER / INTRODUCTION
RFP responses must include the complete name and address of Consultant and the name, mailing address, and telephone number of the contact person regarding the RFP response. A signature by an authorized representative must be included on each RFP response. Said signature will be considered confirmation of the Consultants ability and willingness to comply with all provisions stated herein.
3.2. TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Table of Contents must be a comprehensive listing of the contents included in your RFP response. This section must include a clear definition of the material, exhibits and supplemental information identified by sequential page numbers and by section reference numbers. Each section of the RFP response will be separated by a title page at the beginning of each section.
3.3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Executive Summary shall condense and highlight the contents of the Consultant’s RFP response to provide the Evaluation Committee with a broad understanding of the Consultant’s approach, proposal, experience, and staffing.
3.4. EXPERIENCE
The Consultant shall provide a concise statement demonstrating the Consultant’s qualifications, experience, expertise, and capability to perform the requirements of this RFP. Provide a brief history of your company, including;
• The number of years in business,
• The firm’s service commitment to customers,
• If the firm is involved in any pending litigation that may affect its ability to provide its proposed solution or ongoing maintenance or support of its products and services. • A statement as to whether your firm is an individual proprietorship, partnership, corporation, or private nonprofit firm, and the date your company was formed or incorporated.
3.5. THIRD-PARTY / SUBCONTRACTORS
If the Consultant intends to subcontract, a detailed list of any sub-contractors, partners, or third-party Consultants who will be involved in the implementation of the proposed services including but not limited to:
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 102
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 248
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
• Description of the Consultant’s experience with each of the proposed subcontractors, • Three (3) customer references for each subcontractor to include references names, addresses, and telephone numbers, for products and services like those described in this RFP, • Describe the specific role of each.
3.6. STAFF BIOGRAPHIES
Submit the resumes of the individuals who will be performing the services for the City. Resumes shall be formatted in the following order:
• Position with the Company,
• Length of time with the Company,
• Licenses, registrations, and certifications as required by law to perform the Scope of Work described herein,
• Educational background,
• Role in the Project,
• Experience with the minimum requirements stated herein, • Work history on similar or like projects with the other municipalities.
3.7. PROPOSAL RESPONSE
Under this section Consultants shall provide a full, detailed response to the City ’s Scope of Services listed herein.
Consultants should be as thorough as possible in their response as it may be the only opportunity to convey information regarding your business, ability, and qualifications to complete the services needed.
3.8. EXHIBITS A THROUGH H
The following named Exhibits A through H are a requirement and must be complete and signed where required.
Exhibits are not to be included in your proposal response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – G, H. Failure to comply with this instruction will deem your RFP submittal as non-responsive.
3.9. NON-DISCLOSURE CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Specify any possible conflicts of interest with your current clients or staff members and the City. A signed “Exhibit A, Conflict of Interest and Non-Disclosure Agreement” included herein must be submitted under the Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G, H.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 103
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 249
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
3.10. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT
In addition to the acceptance of the City ’s Terms and Conditions, the successful Consultant will be required to enter into a Professional Services Agreement (“PSA”) with the City, a “Sample” of which is attached in the City ’s bid system for review. All requirements of said PSA must be completed by the successful Consultant and signed by both applicable parties prior to any services being rendered. This RFP sets forth some of the general provisions which may be included in the final PSA. In submitting a response to this RFP, Consultant will be deemed to have agreed to each clause unless otherwise indicated in “Exhibit B, Professional Services Agreement Exceptions Summary” and the City agrees to either accept the objection or deviation or change the PSA language in writing. Failure to raise any objections at the time of this RFP response submittal will result in a waiver of objection to any of the contractual language in the PSA at any other time. The signed Exception Summary must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types tab “Exhibits A – G, H”.
3.11. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INSURANCE
Consultants must meet all insurance requirements as outlined in the Professional Services Agreement. Ability to comply with said requirements must be indicated with signature of “Exhibit C, Acknowledgement of Insurance Requirements and Certification of Ability to Provide and Maintain Coverages Specified”. The awarded Consultant will be responsible for providing the required Certificates of Insurance and must be the Named Insured on the Certificates. Certificates of Insurance from any other entity other than the awarded Consultant, will not be accepted. The signed Acknowledgement of Insurance must be submitted under the Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G, H.
3.12. ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The Consultantshall hereby acknowledge they have received all posted Addendums, if any. It is the Consultant’s responsibility to log into the Bid System to identify and download the number of addenda that have been posted. Addenda issued in correspondence to this RFP shall be considered a part of this RFP and shall become part of any final Contract that may be derived from this RFP. Consultants must indicate their acknowledgement of any Addendums by way of signature on “Exhibit D, Addendum Acknowledgement” and must be submitted under the Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G, H.
3.13. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION
Bidding Consultants must verify by way of signature to “Exhibit E, Consultant Certification Form” that they are not listed on the governmentwide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the guidelines under 2 CFR 200 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), and that neither Consultant nor any of its proposed subcontractors are tax delinquent with the State of California. The signed exhibit must be submitted under the Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G, H.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 104
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 250
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
3.14. PARTICIPATION CLAUSE
Consultants shall provide a completed “Exhibit F, Participation Clause”, must be submitted under the Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G, H. This will indicate a Consultants agreement to or not to allow other entities to utilize the RFP response and awarded contract as a piggyback option.
3.15. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY
“Exhibit G”, Signature of Authority must be submitted under the Planet Bid Response Types, Exhibits A – G, H.
Unsigned RFP responses will not be accepted. The Signature of Authority declares that the Consultant has carefully examined the instruction indicated herein including all terms and condition and specifications, and hereby proposes and agrees, if the Consultants RFP response is accepted, Consultant agrees to furnish all material in accordance with the instruction and specifications in the time and manner prescribed for the unit cost amounts set forth in the Consultants RFP response.
3.16. COMPANY REFERENCES
Provide a minimum of four (4) references, preferably with other municipalities in which similar services are being performed. References must be for work performed or completed within the past three (3) years. “Exhibit H, Reference Worksheet”, must be complete and uploaded into the Planet Bid system under the “Response Type” section identified as “Exhibit H”. While the Reference Worksheet accompanies your RFP response it is not to be discussed in any other area of the RFP response other than the “Response Type, Exhibit H” in Planet Bids.
3.17. LINE-ITEM PRICING
Line-item pricing for this RFP must be provided directly in the Planet Bids system under the “Line Items” tab.
This pricing is not an estimate and is firm fixed price for each item listed. Consultant’s pricing quotes outside of the pricing listed in Planet Bids under the “Line Items” tab will not be accepted or considered for award. Any additional cost required should be noted in the additional cost line item and a summary of the cost provided in the notes section of the line item. While Line-item pricing accompanies your RFP response it is not to be discussed in any other area of the RFP response other than the “Line Item” tab in Planet Bids. The City will not be obligated to any estimated pricing or pricing not identified in the “Line Item” tab in Planet Bids. Failure to provide the required Line-Item pricing in the required format will cause Consultants RFP response to be considered as non-responsive and be eliminated from proceeding any further in the process. Any questions or clarifications regarding how to correctly submit Line-Item pricing should be submitted by the “Questions Due” date and time indicated in the schedule of events.
4. SCOPE OF SERVICES
4.1. PURPOSE
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 105
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 251
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
The City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks a qualified, professional consultant team to develop a robust Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP), tree ordinances, city tree inventory, tree canopy analysis, and locationspecific species policies. These shall incorporate urban forest management best practices, including meeting or exceeding the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission reduction goals set by the City’s Climate Action Plan, wildfire prevention, and a long-term citywide tree canopy cover goal. The UFMP will evaluate the current health of the urban forest and document the types, condition, and distribution of trees within the City and its sphere of influence. The canopy analysis shall also identify opportunities for urban forest expansion for both public and private trees. The UFMP shall provide the City with a long-term plan to manage the citywide urban forest and include comprehensive tree ordinances. The UFMP shall be a comprehensive guide for the City’s urban forest management over the next 50 years.
Specific objectives to be addressed in the UFMP include, but are not limited to:
• Developing a comprehensive city tree inventory, including tree canopy mapping and analysis for the City of Rancho Cucamonga that incorporates existing data. • Provide recommendations to overturn and replenish the declining canopy in older residential neighborhoods and commercial corridors.
• Recommend a tree removal and replacement cycle for species maintained by the City. • Strategies to incentivize tree planting and maintenance throughout the community including disadvantaged areas.
• Strategies to address topped and previously unmaintained or poorly maintained trees. • Develop community feedback, build a consensus, and a vision from community stakeholders regarding a desirable, achievable, and sustainable future urban forest. • Conduct a series of community outreach efforts and resident surveys. • Review existing plans, documents, regulations and ordinances and provide feedback, thoughts, and recommendations to City staff to ensure the UFMP is integrated into City processes in order to protect the urban forest.
• Provide tree preservation ordinance language and options for effective enforcement of a tree preservation ordinance for community, private, and commercial trees. • Recommend tree species and create an urban tree palette for development within the city for mixeduse, residential, commercial, and industrial development. • Integrate State and Fire District defensible space requirements and standards for the Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area into the UFMP.
• Strategies to mitigate tree and infrastructure conflicts around streets, sidewalks, and utilities. Prepare a Street Tree Plan for tree species in the public right-of-way. • Identify tree care, best maintenance practices, and establish a city grid pruning cycle. • Assist with the adoption of the UFMP and tree preservation ordinances through Planning Commission and City Council meetings.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 106
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 252
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
The City does not have a comprehensive tree preservation ordinance nor a comprehensive plan to preserve, expand, or manage the urban forest which results in canopy loss and missed urban forestry opportunities. As the City population expands and climate change becomes a larger issue, there appears to be increased interest from the community to preserve and plant trees along with managing and possibly replacing trees that are of ages and species that are creating a wildfire hazard. The UFMP represents a cross-departmental initiative that will build on planning efforts such as the newly adopted General Plan, the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan, and the Climate Action Plan. Collaborating departments include the Public Works Services Department, the Planning Department, Engineering Services, the City Attorney, the Community Affairs Team, Community Improvement, the Department of Innovation & Technology, and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, along with numerous supporting entities, organizations, and community stakeholders.
4.2. CONSULTANT RESPONSIBILITIES AND SCOPE OF WORK
The UFMP shall be a comprehensive guide for the City’s urban forest management over the next 50 years. It shall be used to mitigate future state mandates, carbon sequestration, drought, urban heat effects, and wildfires. It will be used to set policy for tree planting, removal, and trimming. The consultant will develop the UFMP through engagement and outreach with City and Fire District staff, stakeholders, and the community.
Work to be performed by the consultant personnel includes but are not limited to the following Scope of Work:
• The UFMP must be completed within a twelve (12) month period from the first kick-off meeting, and any code changes to the municipal code should be completed within a three (3) month period after completion of the UFMP.
• The project area includes the entire City of Rancho Cucamonga and its sphere of influence. • At minimum, monthly meetings are required to keep City staff informed as the UFMP progresses. • Consultant shall maintain a current "Action Item" list as meetings occur. • Consultant shall provide and maintain a "Critical Path" project schedule. This schedule shall be updated by the Consultant as appropriate.
• Consultant shall work with City staff to obtain GIS information that is useful to this project. • Consultant shall prepare 1 administrative draft document and 1 public review document. All draft documents shall be produced in a graphic format with text in an editable Word document for easy review/editing.
• Consultant shall provide the City with a cost proposal by task for the work to be performed. • Consultant shall provide and an electronic version in digital and print ready formats as well as all final source files, which will become property of the City.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 107
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 253
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
4.2.1. TREE INVENTORY & CANOPY ANALYSIS SERVICES
The consultant will review and integrate existing City tree ESRI GIS Database information (the current City tree-maintained inventory consists of 77,005 tree locations) and conduct an inventory of all trees located on public property such as sidewalks, streets, medians, public-right of way, public parks, and other accessible City-owned property. The City ESRI GIS Database also includes privately maintained trees in the public rightof-way and the analysis shall include trees located outside of public property within city limits. Trees in wetland corridors need to be inventoried and included in the canopy analysis. The inventory will include, but will not be limited to, collection of data within City limits and the sphere of influence. Data/Inventory will be collected in a form compatible with the City’s existing ESRI GIS database requirement to facilitate long-term management of data by City staff.
The consultant will complete a canopy analysis that provides information on urban forest structure (i.e. species composition, number of trees, tree density, tree health, and other characteristics) that includes trees located outside of public property within city limits and can be geographically segmented. The analysis shall integrate existing data sets from the City GIS inventory as well as add new findings. Consultant shall recommend and create additional analysis of tree canopy on private property, in wetlands corridors, and in designated conservation areas. This analysis will include any other assessments to identify areas of opportunity for planting trees such as by removing concrete/sidewalks, or through planting trees on private property, residential front yards, business complexes, schools, churches and in other strategic areas. This analysis will also include assessments specific to current wildfire hazard reduction and future wildfire hazard management by assessing the community and climate value of fire prone trees, aging and decaying Eucalyptus windrows, and non-producing citrus groves. The canopy analysis shall integrate the understanding of climate change, by incorporating urban heat island effects and average land surface temperature, to inform how urban forest management and expansion activities can mitigate heat impacts. It will also provide information on species composition and age and include wildfire risk assessment based in part on age, species composition, and location relative to the Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Consultant will integrate any existing and historical data which may require collaboration with City staff involved in relevant projects and datasets.
The consultant will determine the optimal size and species of trees to plant in strategic locations for safety and care, maximum greenhouse gas absorption, economic impact, cultural benefit, and wildfire safety. The data will be later used by City staff to design future replanting projects and create/update policies. The resulting analysis will be integrated throughout the public outreach process and function as a primary resource for recommendations and goals for the UFMP.
4.2.2. URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN SERVICES
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 108
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 254
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
The UFMP will be led by a science based, community driven process. The plan will identify a fifty (50) year plan to enhance the urban forest with meaningful and achievable goals. The plan will identify long-term canopy goals that are compatible with the various planning areas within the city and its sphere of influence.
Components of the plan will include an analysis of the current condition of the urban forest, including management methods and stakeholder opinions. The plan will also include an equity analysis to help ensure future urban forest management provides socio-economically equitable benefits to Rancho Cucamonga residents. During the development of the UFMP, the consultant will conduct a review of the City’s municipal codes, applicable State laws, the California Fire Code as adopted by the Fire District, along with current tree care practices, policies, and procedures that currently guide management of city trees.
The Consultant will drive the process to meet at minimum once per month in person or via video conference call or webinar with City and Fire District staff to review the Scope of Work, desired deliverables, schedules, and identify criteria for documenting and developing the UFMP. If necessary, the consultant or City staff will dictate if more meetings are required to finalize the UFMP or conduct public outreach meetings with the community. Discussions shall include community engagement strategies with the City’s Community Affairs Team.
The Consultant will assess the status of the City’s urban forest and conduct an analysis to support a determination for tree canopy goals within the city that meet goals for urban forest health, equity, wildfire prevention and safety, and related watershed and community benefits.
The plan will also identify tree care and maintenance best practices, establish grid pruning cycles based on geographical location and landscape maintenance district, pest control, yearly tree mitigation plantings, community involvement opportunities, related policies, procedures, and develop a comprehensive tree species list to be used for future tree plantings within the city. The plan shall include a comprehensive set of actions for achieving the desired tree canopy goals.
The consultant will also assess the urban forest team and interview Public Works staff to provide a recommendation on staffing levels and the proper use of the team to implement the initiatives of the UFMP.
Existing resources and the current budget will also be discussed with the consultant to effectively achieve a work plan.
The consultant will prepare a summary of the hazard presented by certain tree species present in the urban forest, and within the northern portion of the city. The report shall include recommended specific actions to manage and mitigate hazards through tree maintenance practices, selective removal/replacement strategies for both public and private trees, and ordinances restricting the planting of certain species.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 109
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 255
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
The consultant will develop a comprehensive review of the City’s tree ordinances and related municipal codes to develop language for a comprehensive tree preservation and management ordinance that is consistent with the UFMP, the General Plan, the Climate Action Plan, and the Community Wildfire Protection Plan. The plan will define the needs of a tree preservation and management ordinance, and monitoring/oversight responsibilities needed to effectively manage and maintain such an ordinance. The consultant will assist with creating language to have repercussions when individuals remove tree assets within the public right-of-way or add hazardous tree assets citywide as well as within the Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. It is expected that this work will include an analysis of tree policies that might be appropriate for the City to implement with new development. The consultant will assist staff to determine the best language and structure for an impact fee for the removal of existing trees on private and public property during the entitlement process.
The consultant will facilitate a minimum of six (6) stakeholder/community engagement activities. Activities may include a combination of community “pop-up” events, in person surveys, and hybrid or traditional workshops. The consultant will develop key messaging and collateral, consistent with City branding, such as posters, postcards, flyers, social media, and survey questions, to solicit participation and input as part of the engagement process for the UFMP development.
Engagement activities are open for discussion to communicate the UFMP to the community. The consultant is encouraged to suggest other methods that could encourage public participation. The consultant is expected to develop an authentic public outreach and education campaign that reaches the community planning groups, residents, nonprofit organizations, businesses, academia, community leaders, and City staff to solicit unique ideas and create an alignment with the purpose of the UFMP. Multilingual translation at meetings and of collateral material to be provided by the City.
With City staff facilitation, the consultant will deliver a presentation at two (2) Planning Commission meetings and three (3) City Council meetings on the UFMP process, results, and recommendations that include the adoption of a comprehensive tree ordinance.
The Consultant will prepare a draft plan for City review and incorporate City Comments in the final document. • Develop an outline of content and receive City approval prior to proceeding. • Develop an administrative draft for review and feedback. • Develop a public draft for review and feedback.
• Finalize a final UFMP document for adoption by the City Council.
4.3. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
To qualify the Consultant must meet the following minimum requirements:
1. Five (5) years of public project design experience.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 110
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 256
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. The Consultant must be licensed in the State of California.
3. A general description of the firm, and the credentials and background of the principal and team members who will be responsible for the project.
4. A documented summary and listing of past and present experience including at least three (3) examples of providing Urban Forestry Management Plan and Tree Inventory Services for other public agencies.
5. Experience with or demonstrated knowledge of wildfire prevention and mitigation specific to tree species selection, placement, density, management, removal, and replacement.
6. Demonstrate an ability to lead an equitable engagement process with diverse participation.
7. References with contact information of successfully completed UFMP on schedule and within budget.
8. The Consultant shall prepare a project understanding outline explaining the plan and process to develop the UFMP, a timeline for project completion, and a fee proposal for the work required to complete the UFMP.
9. The names, qualifications, and scope of work to be performed by any sub-consultants who have extensive experience in the specific discipline of the work they will provide to the team.
10. Demonstrate sufficient named/designated staff and resources to meet the requirements of the contract including redundancy of qualified personnel such that key persons can be readily replaced, with City’s pre-approval, in the event of illness, employment change, or other unforeseen reasons.
4.4. CONTRACT TERM
All work associated with the UFMP must be finalized within fifteen (15) months from the first kick-off meeting with City staff. The award of contract by City Council shall be executed before the first kick-off meeting.
5. EVALUATION AND CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS
5.1. INITIAL SCREENING
All RFP responses will undergo an initial review to determine responsiveness to the instructions herein. Those RFP responses initially determined to be responsive by meeting the RFP requirement as indicated herein will proceed to the next phase of the evaluation process.
5.2. EVALUATION ACTIVITIES
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 111
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 257
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
RFP responses deemed as having met the standard RFP requirements as indicated herein are then evaluated by an Evaluation Committee. The RFP submittals are scored and assigned a ranking of one (1) through ten (10), ten being the highest possible score. The following criteria have been assigned percentages that the criteria will be scored against, based upon but not limited to the following evaluation criteria factors:
Criteria
Criteria Description
Assigned
Percentage
Consultant Expertise 15%
Quality of proposed services or goods 15%
Extent to which the Consultants services or goods meet the City ’s needs
15%
Cost 10%
Consultant’s understanding of the City’s Scope of Services and overall quality of work plan; logic, clarity, and deliverables 20% Consultant’s management approach and organization of the team including communication, scheduling, and budget control 15%
Past performance with other government entities/clients with respect to control of costs, quality of work, and meeting deadlines 10%
5.3. COST EVALUATION
Cost Proposals are evaluated and scored based on the following calculations; Score = Lowest Proposal Cost / Cost of Proposal being scored X Maximum Points Available (10) The score is then added to the spreadsheet criteria scores.
5.4. REFERENCE CHECKS
If determined to be required reference checks are conducted by the Procurement Division and the requesting department may or may not be present during the process. The reference checks may be conducted by phone with the information being scribed or conducted by a written form, submitted to the Consultant’s reference contact. Reference contacts will be asked several predetermined questions for response and to provide a score from one (1) to ten (10), ten being the highest. Scores are then tabulated and added to the spreadsheet with the criteria scores. It is imperative that Consultants provide up to date and accurate information regarding contact information for reference checks. All scores are then tabulated into the final Consultant ranking.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 112
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 258
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
Evaluators do not see the Consultant References or pricing line items. The proposed pricing is evaluated by the Procurement Division during the initial review of the RFP response, only to ensure that the proposed cost is not over the City ’s budgeted amount or Not-to-Exceed amount for the project.
5.5. DEMONSTRATIONS/ INTERVIEWS
Upon completion of the RFP evaluations and data analysis, and only, if necessary, selected top ranked Consultants will be provided an opportunity to interview and conduct a demonstration or presentation to further expand on their RFP response. Consultant interviews/demonstrations are scored and assigned a ranking of one (1) through ten (10), ten being the highest possible score, based upon but not limited to the evaluation criteria factors as stated within the RFP.
5.6. FINANCIAL DOCUMENTATION
Consultants that proceed to the short-list may be required to submit financial documentation as proof of its firm’s financial stability and strength. A financial review will be conducted by the City Finance Department.
Should a Consultant wish for its financial documentation to be treated as proprietary or be returned upon completion of the review, the documentation must clearly be marked as such. The following documentation will be required of each Consultant on the short-list:
• A copy of the Consultant’s most recent annual report. • Audited (by a third party), balance sheets and income statements for the past three (3) years. • If audited data is not available, Consultant shall submit copies of complete tax returns for the past three (3) years.
• Describe any regulatory censure and past or pending litigation related to services provided by the Consultant.
• Indicate all applicable information regarding Consultant ownership changes in the last three (3) years.
5.7. BEST AND FINAL OFFER
Upon completion of Consultant presentations, the City reserves the right to conduct pre-award discussions and/or pre-contract negotiations with all or only top ranked Consultants. At which time the City may request a Best and Final Offer to be submitted from one or all finalists.
5.8. CONSULTANT SELECTION
The final Consultant selection is based on which Consultant is the most responsive, meeting the City ’s requirements, offering the best value at the most competitive price. The City is not obligated to award to the lowest price proposal.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 113
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 259
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
The City may conduct negotiations with several Consultants simultaneously. The City may also negotiate contract terms with the selected Consultants prior to award. The City, at its sole discretion, reserves the right, unless otherwise stated, to accept or reject all or any RFP responses, or any part thereof, either separately or to waive any informality and to split or make the award in any manner determined to be in the best interest of the City.
5.9. LETTER OF INTENT TO AWARD
After a final Consultant selection is determined, a Letter of Intent to Award (LOI) will be posted for review by all participating, responsive Consultants. Negotiations shall be confidential and not subject to disclosure to competing Consultants unless an agreement is reached. If contract negotiations cannot be concluded successfully, City may negotiate a contract with the next highest scoring Consultant or withdraw the RFP entirely.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 114
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 260
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
“EXHIBIT A, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONFLICT OF INTEREST/NON-DISCLOSURE STATEMENT” It is the policy of the City to prevent personal or organizational conflict of interest, or the appearance of such conflict of interest, in the award and administration of City Contracts, including, but not limited to Contracts for Professional Services Agreements (“PSA”) with potential Consultants.
I do not have specific knowledge of confidential information regarding RFP responses received in response to the Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011 for The Development Of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan.
I agree not to disclose or otherwise divulge any information pertaining to the contents, status, or ranking of any RFP response to anyone. I understand the terms and "disclose or otherwise divulge" to include, but are not limited to, verbal conversations, written correspondence, reproduction of any part or any portion of any RFP response, or removal of same from designated areas.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the following statements are true and correct and that I understand and agree to be bound by commitments contained herein.
______________________________________ (Print Name)
______________________________________ (Relationship to the City)
______________________________________ (Relationship to the Consultants)
______________________________________ (Signature)
______________________________________ (Date)
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – H.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 115
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 261
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
“EXHIBIT B, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT EXCEPTIONS SUMMARY” Mark the appropriate choice, below:
_____ Consultants accepts the PSA without exception.
OR
_____ Consultants proposes exceptions to the PSA.
Summarize all exceptions on a separate document. Enclose a written summary of each change and title as “Exception Summary”, which shall include the Consultants’ rationale for proposing each such exception. Each exception must be labeled with the Section number in the PSA. Failure to properly reference exceptions in the submitted summary may deem the response as non-responsive. ___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – H.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 116
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 262
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
“EXHIBIT C, ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS AND CERTIFICATION OF ABILITY TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN COVERAGES SPECIFIED”
I, _______________________________ the ______________________________________________ (President, Secretary, Manager, Owner or Representative) of __________________________________________________________________, certify that the (Name of Company, Corporation or Owner)
Specifications and General Provisions regarding insurance requirements as stated within the Professional Services Agreement (PSA), for the Purchase Contract designated Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #19/20-021 for Hazardous Waste Removal, Remediation and Disposal Services On an As Needed Basis have been read and understood and that our Consultants is able to provide and maintain the coverage as specified in the PSA.
Failure to provide said coverage, upon request to finalize the PSA prior to award shall be enough cause for immediate disqualification of award. Failure to maintain said coverage shall result in termination of the contract.
___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – H.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 117
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 263
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
“EXHIBIT D, ADDENDUM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT”
The Consultants hereby acknowledges the following Addenda Number(s) to this RFP have been received, if any.
Consultants understands failure to acknowledge any addenda issued may cause the RFP response to be considered non-responsive. It is the Consultants’ responsibility to log into the Bid System to identify and download the number of addenda that have been posted.
• __________________
• __________________
• __________________
• __________________
___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – H.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 118
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 264
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
“EXHIBIT E, DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION CERTIFICATION FORM” I certify that neither _____________________________ (Consultant) nor any of its proposed subcontractors are not currently listed on the governmentwide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the guidelines under 2 CFR 200 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), and that neither Consultant nor any of its proposed subcontractors are tax delinquent with the State of California.
I acknowledge that if Consultants or any of its subcontractors subsequently are placed under suspension or debarment by a local, state or federal government entity, or if Consultants or any of its subcontractors subsequently become delinquent in California taxes, our Proposal will be disqualified. ___________________________________
Signature
___________________________________
Printed Name
___________________________________
Title
___________________________________
Date
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – H.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 119
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 265
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
“EXHIBIT F, PARTICIPATION CLAUSE”
It is hereby understood that other government entities, such as cities, counties, and special/school districts may utilize this RFP response at their option for equipment or services at the RFP response price for a period of ________ days. Said entities shall have the option to participate in any award made because of this solicitation.
Any such piggy-back awards will be made independently by each agency, and the City is not an agent, partner or representative of these agencies and is not obligated or liable for any action of debts that may arise out of such independently negotiated piggy-back procurement. Each public agency shall accept sole responsibility of its own order placement and payments of the Consultants.
Successful Consultants will extend prices as proposed herein to other governmental agencies, please specify.
YES __________ NO _________
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – H.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 120
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 266
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
“EXHIBIT G, SIGNATURE OF AUTHORITY”
The undersigned firm declares that he has carefully examined the specifications and read the above terms and conditions, and hereby proposes and agrees, if this RFP response is accepted, to furnish all material in accordance with the specifications and instructions, in the time and manner therein prescribed for the unit cost amounts set forth in the following RFP response.
THE CONSULTANT IN SUBMITTING THIS RFP RESPONSE MUST FILL IN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY DEEM YOUR RFP RESPONSE AS NON-RESPONSIVE.
Company Name: Address:
(Street, Su. # City, State, Zip)
Telephone #:
Fax #:
E-mail address: Web Address:
Authorized Representative: (print) Title:
Signature: Date:
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – H.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 121
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 267
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
“EXHIBIT H” REFERENCES WORKSHEET
The following References Worksheet must be complete, please do not mark “See Attached”. Provide a minimum of four (4) clients that are similar in size to the City of Rancho Cucamonga that your company has conducted comparable or like services. Preferred references should be government agencies and be a current customer within the past three (3) years. Please verify accuracy of contact information.
Reference 1
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Reference 2
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 122
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 268
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
Reference 3
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Reference 4
Company Name
Contact Name and Title
Company Address
Contact Telephone Number
Contact Email
Description of Comparative Services and
Project Cost (please be specific)
Exhibits are not to be included in your bid response. All referenced Exhibits must be submitted in Planet Bids system under the Response Types, Exhibits A – H.
`
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 123
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 269
PROPOSAL
Comprehensive Urban Forest
Management Plan
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MAY 25, 2022
38 North Marengo Avenue / Pasadena, CA 91101 / 626.204.9800 DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 124
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 270
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan i Cover Letter/Introduction
May 25, 2022
Ruth Cain, CPPB
Procurement Manager
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Subject: Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan Dear Ms. Cain,
Dudek understands that the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) requires a team with a comprehensive approach to urban forest management planning. The City can count on Dudek to develop an urban forest management plan (UFMP) that will be a high-quality, model-planning tool that will incorporate key stakeholder tree priorities and values toward developing a strategic framework and implementation plan. The Dudek team will bring the City the following strengths:
ISA-Certified Project Manager Leading a Comprehensive Team. The Dudek team will be managed by Project Manager Ryan Allen, an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA)-Certified Arborist with 14 years’ experience in urban forestry. Mr. Allen will be supported by subject matter experts who will lead specific project tasks. Dudek team expertise includes ISA-Certified Arborists, municipal specialists, tree risk assessment qualified arborists, a plant pathologist, urban planners, geographic information system (GIS) specialists, community engagement specialists, environmental data scientists, and graphic designers.
Applications of Best Practices from Similar Experience. The Dudek team has successfully completed numerous UFMPs, street tree master plans, and related urban forestry projects. Recent relevant UFMPs include those for the Cities of Los Angeles, La Mesa, Temecula, Beverly Hills, Downey, San José, Rancho Cordova, Salinas, and Willits.
A Responsive Team that Builds your Trust. Our team will be responsive while staying on task and schedule. We are available on short notice and will follow up on communication within 24 hours. We create strong working relationships and build trust with our clients to deliver quality products.
Dudek genuinely appreciates the opportunity to present our proposal and we are excited at the prospect to further discuss our comprehensive approach to urban forest planning with the City. Should you have questions regarding this proposal, please contact Ryan Allen at 626.658.0070 or [email protected].
Sincerely,
__________________________________ _____________________________________ Joseph Monaco, AICP Ryan Allen
President/CEO Project Manager
Joseph Monaco is authorized to sign on behalf of Dudek.
CONSULTANT INFORMATION
Dudek
Headquarters: 605 Third Street
Encinitas, California, 92024
Ryan Allen, Project Manager
38 North Marengo Avenue
Pasadena, California, 91101
626.658.0070
[email protected]
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 125
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 271
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan ii Table of Contents
SECTIONS
Cover Letter/Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................i Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................1 Experience............................................................................................................................................................................................3 Third-Party/Subcontractors ...............................................................................................................................................................8 Staff Biographies.................................................................................................................................................................................9 Proposal Response..........................................................................................................................................................................16 Schedule............................................................................................................................................................................................27
FIGURES
1 The UFMP Toolkit’s framework for UFMP development.................................................................................................1 2 Dudek Team Organization ..................................................................................................................................................9
APPENDIX
A Resumes
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 126
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 272
Executive Summary
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 127
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 273
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 1 Executive Summary
Approach
Urban Forest Management Plans (UFMPs) are opportunities for Dudek to actualize our core values as we plan to create a healthy urban forest for our future. We look forward to putting these values into practice as we partner with the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) to develop a UFMP that reflects the needs of the City and its community members. Dudek’s comprehensive approach to urban forest management planning is driven by meaningful community engagement and technical expertise to develop a guide for urban trees over a 50-year timeframe.
The City can count on Dudek to design and implement a UFMP that has measurable and specific goals, applying a strategic approach to better manage the urban forest. The document will clearly and concisely present the complexities of urban forest management with visually appealing graphics. Our in-house team creates infographics to help relay important UFMP topics in an easy-to-understand way for both seasoned urban foresters and the public alike.
The UFMP Toolkit (http://ufmptoolkit.net), compiled by the Inland Urban Forest Council, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE), and the California Urban Forest Council, provides the framework for Dudek’s UFMP approach. By following the logical planning steps established in the toolkit, Dudek can develop a UFMP for the City that is rooted in effective planning principals and science-based analysis.
Figure 1. The UFMP Toolkit’s framework for UFMP development DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 128
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 274
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 2 Proposal
The discussion in our Proposal Response is organized to reflect the steps we will take to complete the UFMP and inventory. The Proposal Response is categorized into larger tasks that encompass the various specific sub-tasks outlined in the scope of work of the RFP. Those tasks and sub-tasks include the following:
▪ Project management: Monthly meetings, “Action Item” list, “Critical Path” schedule, and data acquisition ▪ Tree Inventory: Tree data review and update and database management ▪ Canopy Cover Analysis: Canopy cover analysis, tree planting opportunity assessment, urban heat island mitigation, wildland–urban interface (WUI) assessment, equity analysis, and recommendations for strategic tree planting
▪ Status of the Urban Forest: Establish tree canopy goals, analyze the tree inventory against sustainability indicators, and determine the environmental services and economic value of tree the inventory ▪ Tree Management: Identify best management practices for City tree management, develop a recommended tree species list, summarize hazard tree species and management recommendations, interview relevant City department staff, review budget and staffing levels, and create an internal governance structure
▪ Tree Ordinances, Policies, and Planning Documents: Review the City’s tree ordinance and municipal code, review the existing City planning documents, and develop the tree preservation and management ordinance ▪ Community Engagement: In-person engagement activities, online engagement activities, social media, and supporting materials
▪ Strategic Plan: Strategic Plan Framework, Implementation Plan, and Monitoring Plan ▪ UFMP Development and Presentations: Outline, administrative draft, public draft, final UFMP, and presentations to the City Council and Planning Commission Experience and Staffing
Dudek will serve this contract from our Pasadena and San Juan Capistrano offices to provide the City with a local team knowledgeable of the Rancho Cucamonga region and readily available for in-person meetings and community engagement activities, saving time and money. Dudek’s urban foresters have extensive experience in Southern California arboriculture and urban forestry having completed numerous UFMPs, tree inventories, wildfire assessments, and other arboriculture services throughout San Bernadino, Los Angeles, Orange, and Riverside counties. This experience gives our team a deep understanding of local ordinances, management practices, climate conditions, and tree species that is integral for development of the UFMP.
In the last four years, Dudek has completed, or is in the process of completing, UFMPs, tree ordinance updates, and tree management program assessments for 13 cities throughout California, with local relevant municipalities including Los Angeles, Downey, Beverly Hills, Temecula, Irvine, and Oxnard. Project Manager Ryan Allen has been the lead author or project manager for all these projects and brings 14 years’ experience in urban forestry within the Southern California region. Collectively, the Dudek team has more than 20 years’ community engagement expertise.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 129
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 275
Experience
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 130
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 276
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 3 Experience
Firm Profile
Dudek assists municipalities on a broad range of projects that improve California’s communities, infrastructure, and natural environment. From planning, design, and permitting through construction, we move projects through the complexities of regulatory compliance, budgetary and schedule constraints, and conflicting stakeholder interests. We have a long history of providing environmental services to municipalities throughout California and know the local environmental resources and agency policies pertaining to resource management, development impact assessment, and mitigation.
Dudek has built a reputation for providing exemplary environmental, planning, regulatory, engineering, construction management, operations, and funding expertise, offering municipalities a cost-effective way to accomplish short- and long-term goals. Dudek’s project managers are empowered to make nimble decisions and quickly draw from our pool of technical experts.
Service Commitment
Our project managers are empowered to solve problems and make decisions in a timely fashion to keep project momentum moving forward. With low employee turnover, our staff’s long tenure means the team you meet at project start will see your projects through to completion. We offer the most value for clients by doing the following:
▪ Being the best integrated, multifaceted team in the industry, with high-quality work products and clientfocused service ▪ Being engaged listeners to understand problems and think through the highest value-oriented approach ▪ Anticipating and planning for our clients’ stakeholder needs ▪ Focusing on innovation to make smarter progress
▪ Being easy to work with because we are structured to support clients ▪ Understanding the stakes and the price of delays or failure Urban Forestry
Dudek offers clients a diverse urban forestry practice with expertise in a variety of urban and wildland forestry specialties. Our certified and licensed arboriculture and forestry professionals bring experienced, valuable insight to tree management issues, providing creative approaches to difficult and controversial projects. Among our specialties are UFMPs, arborist and forester reports documenting tree resources within a project area, health and condition assessment reports, and appraised value reports; we also offer training on tree maintenance and pruning.
DUDEK AT A GLANCE
▪ 42 years in business
▪ Employee-owned California
corporation
▪ 12 California offices,
including, Pasadena
▪ 700+ employees
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 131
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 277
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 4 Our arborists have successfully completed thousands of arboricultural projects focused on tree inventories and tree preservation, including the following tree-related issues:
▪ Tree Inventories
▪ Pest and disease assessments
▪ Tree Hazard Assessment
▪ Sidewalk repair
▪ Conflict resolution
▪ Tree appraisals
▪ Insurance case support
▪ Development/construction impact analysis
▪ Tree relocation studies and support
▪ Tree protection plans
We have developed unique solutions to a wide variety of tree-related issues and draw upon this insight for project success.
Dudek’s team of certified arborists and foresters have extensive experience conducting technical field evaluations, conducting tree and forestland assessments, supervising tree maintenance activities, monitoring trees during construction activity, and inspecting and diagnosing tree pest/disease conditions. We also understand tree hazard assessment protocols and conduct tree hazard evaluations on individual trees and larger stands of trees.
Our team includes Tree Risk Assessment Qualifications (TRAQ)-certified arborists who understand that tree hazards must be proactively managed. We routinely develop tree pruning, removal, and planting specifications and have monitored such activities for compliance with adopted protocols and standards. Dudek’s foresters and arborists also have significant experience preparing technical written documents, reports, and management plans for trees/forests, and help our clients secure necessary approvals or permits for conducting work on regulated trees.
WILDFIRE RESILIENCE PLANNING
Dudek’s wildfire resilience planning team develops high-quality planning documents focused on reducing wildfire risk to communities and resources. Our planning documents are supported by thorough technical analyses of wildfire hazard and potential fire behavior, which support development and prioritization of risk mitigation strategies. We have completed numerous plans across a variety of vegetation communities and land management jurisdictions. Our knowledge of the regulatory environment results in plans that are effective and implementable.
Our wildfire resilience planning professionals prepare the following planning documents:
▪ Community Wildfire Protection Plans (CWPPs)
▪ Regional Priority Plans
▪ Vegetation/Fuel Management Plans
▪ Wildland Fire Management Plans
▪ Forest Health Plans
▪ Wildfire Risk Analyses
▪ Wildfire Hazard and Fire Behavior Modeling Analyses
▪ California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Documents ▪ CAL FIRE Plan, Exemption, and Emergency Notices
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 132
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 278
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 5 Relevant Project Experience
The Dudek team has provided urban forestry and wildfire prevention and mitigation services for municipalities throughout California, including tree inventories and assessments and the development of UFMPs. Additionally, we have led or supported clients with community and stakeholder outreach and engagement to educate and gain consensus among diverse participants. Following is a representative sample of projects completed by Dudek that demonstrate our ability to perform the services outlined in the Request for Proposals (RFP). References are provided separately in the References Worksheet (Exhibit H) as required by the City.
TEMECULA URBAN FORESTRY MANAGEMENT PLAN AND INVENTORY
Client: City of Temecula
Dudek is in the process of developing the City of Temecula’s UFMP, which includes a tree inventory of 27,000 trees. The project includes analysis of the current status of the urban forest and identified threats to current species based on predicted climate change and invasive pests/pathogens. In addition, Dudek developed a significant community education component, including an urban forest summit, pop-up outreach events, a working group, and outreach pamphlets. Other project tasks include re-establishing the City’s tree maintenance policy and standards, reviewing the City’s existing tree ordinance, and developing a master tree planting plan with a recommended tree species palette that received input from various stakeholders and community groups. The plan will align with the City’s core steering document, Quality of Life Master Plan, to ensure that the UFMP will be successfully implemented.
LA MESA URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN
Client: City of La Mesa
Dudek is currently developing the City of La Mesa’s UFMP document that includes a thorough analysis of all management practices, a LiDAR canopy cover analysis, facilitating a stakeholder working group, interviews with all relevant City staff who impact trees, and analysis of the current status of the urban forest. The goal of the UFMP is to help the City of La Mesa reach canopy cover and greenhouse gas emission reduction goals of their Climate Action Plan. The project is funded through CAL FIRE, and all project objectives will be aimed toward achieving the stated outcomes of the grant project.
EUCALYPTUS WINDROW STUDY
Client: City of Irvine
Dudek arborists and urban foresters conducted the initial urban forest inventory (75,000 trees) throughout city streets, urban areas, and parks. Follow-up inventories continue on a 4-year cycle to update the City of Irvine’s database and maintain data accuracy. Inventory data was critical in analyzing tree populations and tree attribute information. This information ultimately supported the preparation of the City of Irvine’s UFMP, which addresses tree species diversity, distribution, trim cycles, species recommendations for future planting, changes from initial plantings, and planting opportunity identification throughout the city.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 133
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 279
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 6
DOWNEY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN AND STREET TREE MASTER PLAN Client: City of Downey
Dudek developed the City of Downey’s 30-year planning document to expand canopy cover, implement efficient management practices, and increase public awareness of the urban forest. This process included a thorough analysis of the current tree inventory, canopy cover analysis, calculating ecological benefits of the urban forest using the i-Tree Eco suite, and determining the current value of the City of Downey’s trees.
We have reviewed current policies and ordinances against urban forest sustainability standards and will update these documents and create new policies as appropriate. We assessed the governance structure, interdepartmental protocols, and management practices of the City of Downey through departmental interviews with all staff who impact trees. Tree inventory and geographic information system (GIS) data was used to develop a Street Tree Master Plan as a section of the UFMP that provides specific guidance on where trees are needed and what species could be planted in vacant planting sites.
BEVERLY HILLS URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN
Client: City of Beverly Hills
Dudek is currently developing the 30-year UFMP document for the City of Beverly Hills, with the goal of implementing sustainable management practices to create a healthy urban forest canopy. Dudek also analyzed the City-managed tree population, completed a wildfire hazard assessment for an area designated as a very high fire hazard severity zone, and provided recommendations to manage a more fire safe community that will be included as a chapter of the UFMP.
SAN JOSÉ COMMUNITY FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN
Client: City of San José
Dudek completed San José’s Community Forest Management Plan (CFMP), driven by meaningful community engagement and technical expertise. Project tasks included analyzing the existing tree canopy cover using satellite imagery; conducting 17 interviews with City of San José staff, elected officials, and stakeholders; creating a project webpage and outreach video; conducting a Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats analysis of current management practices; determining the condition of the City of San Jose’s urban forest; managing online community engagement forums; and developing achievable short- and long-term goals. The resulting CFMP clearly and concisely presented the complexities of community forest management with accompanying easy-to-interpret graphics so that the document was understandable to seasoned urban foresters and the general public. The project website can be viewed at http://sanjosecfmp.com.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 134
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 280
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 7
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, FIRST STEP TO AN URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN Client: City Plants
Dudek was selected in a competitive process to prepare a UFMP framework for the City of Los Angeles. We completed extensive City of Los Angeles department interviews, an online public survey resulting in more than 2,600 responses, monthly stakeholder working group meetings, comparison of Los Angeles urban forestry with three other strategically selected cities, evaluation of the urban forest governance structure and current urban forestry budgets against industry standards, assessment of urban forest policies and regulations, and development of a road map to urban forest sustainability. The project was completed in December 2018, and Dudek presented the findings and recommendations at two public hearings. The plan can be viewed online at https://www.cityplants.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/10939_LA-City-Plants_FirstStep_Report_FINAL_updt_7- 2019.pdf.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 135
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 281
Third-Party/Subcontractors
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 136
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 282
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 8 Third-Party/Subcontractors
Dudek is capable of performing all of the services outlined in the Request for Proposals (RFP) with in-house staff.
No subcontractors will be used to verify the City’s tree inventory, develop the UFMP, and provide support services such as community and stakeholder outreach.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 137
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 283
Staff Biographies
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 138
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 284
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 9 Staff Biographies
All licensed and certified Dudek staff members routinely engage in continuing education efforts to maintain their credentials and stay current on the latest research and technologies employed in the urban forestry field. This helps our team maintain up-to-date knowledge regarding trees, impact minimization techniques, and preservation methods where trees may experience disturbances. Dudek personnel and credentials include the following:
▪ Registered Consulting Arborist (RCA), American Society of Consulting Arborists ▪ ISA- and ISA-TRAQ Certified Arborists
▪ Municipal Arborist Specialist
▪ Certified Planners, American Institute of Certified Planners We have assembled a team with the knowledge and specific expertise to complete the scope of services outlined in the RFP. Michael Huff, RCA, ISA-Certified Arborist, and director of Dudek’s urban forestry team, will serve as principal in charge. Urban Forestry Specialist and ISA-Certified Arborist Ryan Allen will be the project manager and serve as the primary point of contact for the City, overseeing the project from Dudek’s Pasadena office. Mr. Allen will be supported by Urban Forestry and Wildfire Planner Dana Link-Herrera who will serve as deputy project manager from our Santa Barbara office.
Figure 2 outlines Dudek’s team organization for this contract, followed by brief biographies for all proposed personnel. Resumes for key staff are provided in Appendix A.
Figure 2. Dudek Team Organization
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 139
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 285
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 10 Ryan Allen
PROJECT MANAGER
Ryan Allen is an urban forester with 14 years’ experience providing strategic environmental planning to organizational programs, including UFMPs. Mr. Allen’s work deepens the positive impact on the communities he serves and increases organizational capacity. Mr. Allen has experience working with elected officials and staff and building and maintaining strategic partnerships. His urban forestry expertise includes managing tree inventories and assessments, ordinance and policy review, tree planting and removal, and wildfire management.
Relevant Projects/Experience
▪ UFMP Roadmap | CITY OF LOS ANGELES
▪ UFMP | CITY OF TEMECULA
▪ UFMP | CITY OF LA MESA
▪ UFMP | CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS
▪ UFMP and Street Tree Master Plan | CITY OF DOWNEY
▪ CFMP | CITY OF SAN JOSÉ
Education
Pepperdine University
BA, Communications, (Creative
Writing emphasis)
Certifications
ISA-Certified Arborist,
No. WE 10316A
ISA TRAQ
ISA Municipal Specialist
Years with Dudek: 4
Dana Link-Herrera
DEPUTY PROJECT MANAGER
Dana Link-Herrera is an urban forestry and wildfire planner with 7 years’ experience and a strong foundation in environmental and urban planning. She has a diverse background in natural resource management, environmental analysis, permitting support, community outreach, and CEQA/NEPA analysis and documentation. Ms. LinkHerrera assists with the preparation of UFMPs, fire protection plans (FPPs), CWPPs, and technical analyses in accordance with CEQA/NEPA and local/regional policies.
Relevant Projects/Experience
▪ UFMP | CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
▪ UFMP | CITY OF WILLITS
▪ UFMP| CITY OF TEMECULA
▪ UFMP | CITY OF CHICO
▪ Community Wildfire Protection Plan | CITY OF SANTA BARBARA Education
California Polytechnic State
University, Pomona
MURP, Urban and Regional
Planning
University of California,
San Diego
BA, International Studies
(Environmental Studies minor)
Professional Affiliations
APA, AEP
Years with Dudek: 4
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 140
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 286
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 11 Michael Huff, RCA
PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE
Michael Huff is founder and manager of Dudek’s Urban Forestry/Fire Protection Planning team with 29 years’ experience as a forester and fire protection planner. Mr. Huff specializes in management ofcommunitywide and project-specific FPPs, WUI fire management plans, wildfire hazard reduction projects, CEQA supporting technical documents, Oak Woodland impact and mitigation plans, UFMPs and CFMPs, forest and tree inventories, impact analysis studies, and tree hazard evaluations.
Relevant Projects/Experience
▪ UFMP | CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS
▪ UFMP Roadmap | CITY OF LOS ANGELES
▪ UFMP | NATIONAL CITY
▪ UFMP and Street Tree Master Plan | CITY OF DOWNEY
▪ UFMP | CITY OF IRVINE
Education
Northern Arizona University
BS, Forest Management
Certifications
RCA
ISA-Certified Arborist,
No. WE-4276A
Certified Wildland Fire Ecologist
Years with Dudek: 20
Abby Beissinger
URBAN FOTRESTRY PLANNER
Abby Beissinger is an urban forestry analyst and plant pathologist with 7 years’ experience implementing integrated pest management strategies in the green industry and commercial agriculture. Her expertise includes developing science-based plant health management plans; pathogen and insect diagnostics on trees, vegetables, fruit, and ornamental crops; community engagement; and research and data analysis. Ms. Beissinger has assisted with the development of UFMPs and wildfire management plans for municipalities throughout California.
Relevant Projects/Experience
▪ UFMP | CITY OF LA MESA
▪ UFMP and Street Tree Master Plan | CITY OF DOWNEY
▪ CFMP | CITY OF SAN JOSÉ
▪ UFMP | CITY OF WILLITS
▪ UFMP | CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
▪ Eucalyptus Internal Decay Study | CITY OF IRVINE
Education
Washington State University
MS, Plant Pathology
University of WisconsinMadison
BA, Anthropology
Professional Affiliations
American Phytopathological
Society
Years with Dudek: 1.5
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 141
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 287
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 12 Christopher Kallstrand
URBAN FORESTRY PLANNER
Christopher Kallstrand is an urban forestry specialist with 17 years’ experience providing technical assistance on projects ranging from arboricultural assessments and large-scale oak management plans to biological resources monitoring. Projects include UFMPs, assessment and inventory of oak woodlands, relocation and preservation of trees on development sites, native trees and vegetation surveys, post-burn damage assessments, landscape tree appraisal, GPS mapping, environmental and biological resources monitoring, data analysis, and preparation of assessment reports and oak management and preservation plans.
Relevant Projects/Experience
▪ Tree Inventory and Mapping | CITY OF IRVINE
▪ UFMP | CITY OF LA MESA
▪ UFMP | CITY OF TEMECULA
▪ UFMP and Street Tree Master Plan | CITY OF DOWNEY
▪ UFMP | CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS
Education
Iowa State University
BS, Forestry: Natural Resource
Conservation
Certifications
ISA-Certified Arborist,
No. WE-8208A
TRAQ
ISA Municipal Specialist
Years with Dudek: 15
Katrina Burritt
TREE INVENTORY MANAGER
Katrina Burritt is a certified arborist and licensed pest control advisor specializing in weeds, insects, and pathogens with 9 years’ experience in the public and private sectors. Ms. Burritt possesses advanced knowledge in all aspects of large-scale inventorying, tree risk assessments, pest monitoring, arborist reports, construction monitoring, field data collection and evaluation utilizing GPS and GIS technology, and preparing plant appraisals. In addition, she has contributed to planning and implementation of native plant restoration projects and invasive plant removal on public lands.
Relevant Projects/Experience
▪ UFMP | CITY OF TEMECULA
▪ As-Needed Arboricultural Services | CITY OF ENCINITAS ▪ As-Needed Arboricultural Services | CITY OF PLACENTIA ▪ Citywide Tree Program Review and Report | CITY OF CHICO ▪ Tree Inventory and Mapping | CITY OF IRVINE
Education
California Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo
BS, Environmental Protection
and Horticultural Science
Certifications
ISA-Certified Arborist
TRAQ
Pest Control Advisor
(Categories A, B, and E)
Recycled water Site Supervisor
Years with Dudek: 1
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 142
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 288
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 13 Aida Castro
TREE INVENTORY SPECIALIST
Aida Castro is an urban forestry specialist and certified arborist with 3 years’ experience. Ms. Castro has provided species identification and inspection, and evaluation of vegetation along utility power lines. She has led teams conducting tree identification and inventorying and coordinated with clients and agencies on utility vegetation management projects. Additionally, Ms. Castro utilizes GIS software such as Collector and Survey123 to analyze collected data.
Relevant Projects/Experience
▪ Utility Forester | CN UTILITY CONSULTING
Education
Humboldt State University
BS, Environmental Science and
Management
Certifications
ISA-Certified Arborist,
No. WE-133396A
Years with Dudek: <1
Doug Nickles, RPF
WILDFIRE PLANNING SPECIALIST
Doug Nickles is a fire protection planner with 32 years’ experience as a fire marshal, urban fire forester, open space planner, and licensed forester. Mr. Nickles specializes in preparing FPPs, WUI fire management plans, evacuation plans, multi-hazard emergency response plans, and forest and natural resource management plans. He possesses considerable experience in fire and building code life safety regulations, WUI development project planning and protection, emergency preparedness, emergency response planning, and public education and information.
Relevant Projects/Experience
▪ Newhall Ranch Fire Hazard Reduction Plan | PRIVATE DEVELOPER ▪ Fanita Ranch FPP | PRIVATE DEVELOPER
▪ Wildhaven FPP | PRIVATE DEVELOPER
▪ Saddleback El Toro Fuel Modification Planning | PRIVATE DEVELOPER ▪ Pointe Molate Emergency Response Plan | PRIVATE DEVELOPER Education
California Lutheran University
MBA, Business Administration
Humboldt State University
BS, Forestry (Fire
Management)
Certifications
RPF, No. 2135
Wildland Fire Behavior
Certificate, County of Los
Angeles Fire Department
Archaeology Certificate,
CAL FIRE
Incident Information Officer
Certificate, CAL FIRE
Years with Dudek: 2
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 143
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 289
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 14 Kalie Ortiz
COMMUNITY OUTREACH SPECIALIST
Kalie Ortiz is an urban forestry specialist with a background in forestry and an applied focus in hydrology. She has 2 years’ experience as a water equity organizer and community outreach coordinator for a nonprofit organization where she managed and supported urban forestry/water-related project development in the greater Los Angeles region. Ms. Ortiz’s expertise in forestry and community engagement assists her as she contributes to the development of sustainable and equitable UFMPs.
Relevant Projects/Experience
▪ UFMP | CITY OF TEMECULA
▪ Urban Forest Master Plan | CITY OF CHICO
▪ Urban Forest Financing Study | CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Education
Humboldt State University
BS, Forestry, concentration in
Hydrology
Years with Dudek: 1
Clarissa Boyajian
DATA SCIENTIST
Clarissa Boyajian is a certified arborist with 5 years’ experience in urban forestry nonprofit management. Ms. Boyajian has experience using R, Python, and command line programming languages for projects to analyze satellite and spatial data to calculate tree canopy cover and create custom map layers for tree inventory systems. Ms. Boyajian has cultivated strong collaborative relationships with community members, business owners, and municipal staff.
Relevant Previous Projects/Experience
▪ UFMP | CITY OF SALINAS
▪ Urban Forestry Analysis | CITY OF PORTLAND
▪ Koreatown Youth & Community Center | LOS ANGELES
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
▪ Urban Forestry Manager| TREEPEOPLE
Education
University of California, Santa
Barbara
MS, Environmental Data Science
Occidental College
BA, Urban and Environmental
Policy
Certifications
ISA-Certified Arborist,
No. WE-12099A
Years with Dudek: 1
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 144
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 290
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 15 Curtis Battle
GIS TECHNICIAN
Curtis Battle is a GIS technician with 12 years’ experience in a wide variety of GIS platforms and techniques. Mr. Battle has expertise in ArcMap, ArcCatalog, and ArcPad; Trimble, Spectra, and Garmin GPS platforms; geodatabase construction and maintenance; quantitative geographic methods; cartography; species distribution modeling; remote sensing fundamentals and methods; Python programming; and cartography. He has provided GIS support for numerous environmental impact reports; technical studies, including biological technical reports, vegetation mapping, and wildlife surveys; mitigated negative declarations; preliminary environmental analysis reports; initial studies; and mitigation monitoring and reporting programs.
Relevant Projects/Experience
▪ UFMP | CITY OF TEMECULA
▪ Urban Forest Master Plan | CITY OF CHICO
▪ UFMP | CITY OF WILLITS
▪ UFMP | CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Education
San Diego State University
MS, GIScience
BA, Geography
Mesa College
AS, GIS Specialist
Years with Dudek: 7
Raoul Rañoa
SENIOR GRAPHIC DESIGNER
Raoul Rañoa is a senior graphic designer with 24 years' experience breaking down complex data and processes into detailed, visual presentations suitable for experts and a general audience. Mr. Rañoa has prepared print, online, and animated visuals covering every facet of the environmental consulting industry, including large-scale construction projects, unmanned aerial survey missions, sea-level-rise, hydrological processes, and green-technology. He is knowledgeable in print and web graphics production, including prepress, vector and 3D illustration, GIS, social media, video, and motion graphics.
Relevant Projects/Experience
▪ UFMP | CITY OF DOWNEY
▪ CFMP | CITY OF SAN JOSÉ
▪ UFMP | CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Education
California Polytechnic State
University, Pomona
BA, Communications
(Journalism Focus)
Years with Dudek: 4
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 145
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 291
Proposal Response
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 146
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 292
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 16 Proposal Response
Task 1: Project Management
Dudek will initiate the project with a kickoff meeting between City staff and the Dudek team to identify specific project goals and confirm reporting and communication procedures. The kickoff meeting will also be a data acquisition meeting, prior to which we will have prepared a list of any data needs or gaps. During the meeting, we will discuss these needs and gaps, and any remaining information voids will be filled through research efforts or further coordination with the City. We will provide an agenda prior to the meeting and will submit meeting minutes summarizing major topic discussions following the meeting.
Monthly Meetings, Action Item List, and Critical Path
Following the project kickoff meeting, Dudek will meet monthly (virtually) with City staff to discuss scope of work details, the “Action Item” List, and “Critical Path” to ensure clear communication of progression of the project and to ensure on-time completion of desired deliverables. It will also be an opportunity to discuss community engagement strategies, and existing tree planting efforts, as well as to identify criteria for documenting and developing the UFMP. These monthly meetings will occur throughout the duration of the project and will be the chief way the City will be informed of project progress. Additional project communication not addressed during the monthly meetings will occur via email or telephone.
Task 2: Tree Inventory
Data Collection
Dudek will conduct a comprehensive review of the existing tree inventory and integrate the existing ESRI GIS Database information of all trees on public property including sidewalks, streets, medians, public-right-of way, public parks, and other accessible City-owned property. The review will include privately maintained trees in the public-right-of way, trees located outside of public property within City limits, and within wetland corridors. The goal of this review will be to verify tree inventory data, ensure data quality, and update tree inventory data.
To accomplish this task Dudek’s arborists and tree risk inspectors, certified and qualified by the International Society of Arboriculture, will conduct a level 1 visual assessment of all 77,005 tree locations within the existing City database. The visual assessment will consist of level 1 evaluation (windshield survey) for trees accessible by vehicle and a walk-by assessment when not accessible by vehicle. The visual assessment will be used to verify tree inventory data including tree species, size, health conditions, potential hazards, and other information contained within the database. This method will provide the City with the most efficient and cost-effective approach to completing the requested review of the City inventory.
To ensure that the tree inventory review task remains on schedule, the Dudek team will discuss the tree inventory review during the kickoff meeting to identify each team member’s responsibilities, goals, tasks, and timelines. The tree inventory project manager, Katrina Burritt, will set up bi-weekly meetings with the appropriate City staff to ensure project success. Dudek staff will send weekly updates to the City for data review and to track progression throughout the City. In conjunction with weekly data updates, Ms. Burritt will monitor the data collector’s daily progress on electronic tracking sheets. This information provides the number of trees surveyed by each inventory specialist each day and ensures that the project stays on schedule.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 147
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 293
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 17 Task 3: Canopy Cover Analysis
Dudek will conduct a canopy analysis that includes all trees within City limits, including public and private property trees, open space, natural resource areas, creek and riparian areas, golf courses, and other areas defined by the project team and the City. This analysis will focus on the City’s existing canopy cover, which consists of the area of the City covered by trees when viewed from above. The resulting canopy cover study will provide information on the distribution of trees and tree density on all identified study areas, and provide analysis if trees are equitably distributed throughout the City.
Dudek will conduct an image-based mapping of urban tree canopies within the City, using purchased satellite imagery from 2022. The tree canopy analysis for 2022 will use a machine learning image classification process to identify tree canopy cover as well as other land use classification types, such as impervious surfaces, vegetation, bare earth, and water. We will perform an accuracy assessment to evaluate the accuracy of the urban tree canopy product. Dudek also proposes to document our methodology so that the City can conduct a similar analysis in the future.
In addition, Dudek will complete a change analysis utilizing publicly available canopy and land use data generated by the United States Forest Service Urban Tree Canopy Assessment in 2012 and 2018. High-resolution spatial imagery will be used to assess all land use classification types, including trees, shrubs, bare earth, and impervious surfaces. With 2012, 2018, and 2022 canopy cover data, Dudek will also perform a change analysis to understand if canopy cover is increasing or declining and identify where the changes occur. This analysis will provide valuable insights to understand if current management practices, ordinances, and policies are effective in preserving and maintaining trees, and inform recommendations to update management strategies to increase canopy cover where decline is observed.
Task 3.1.1 Tree Planting Opportunities, Heat Island Mitigation, and WUI Assessment The first step to developing a 50-year plan to achieve equitable canopy cover will be to determine areas of the City where resources are needed and where an injection of these resources would provide the greatest community net benefit. To determine these areas, our GIS specialists will overlay the updated tree canopy analysis with CalEnviroscreen 4.0, urban heat island data, and other data provided by the City, such as heat exposure areas, disadvantaged communities, impervious surfaces, council districts, and land types. These data will inform the analysis and help to determine if specific areas are lacking tree canopy and whether these deficits are impacting certain parts of the community more than others. Strategic areas for tree planting opportunities—such as within private property, school grounds, commercial corridors, parks and open space, parking lots, and transportation corridors—will be discussed with City staff and the community. Dudek will work with City staff to review and identify opportunities for increasing canopy cover in these areas.
Dudek’s team of urban foresters and GIS specialists will analyze various layers on a map of the City to present a clear picture of where the City should strategically invest resources. Results will be reported as City total canopy coverage and then further broken down by public and private property and land cover types, such as open space, natural resource areas, creek and riparian areas, golf courses, parks, transportation corridors, council districts, or similar delineation. Our graphics staff will take the interpretation of this information and create charts, graphs, and tables that are visually appealing and understandable for inclusion in the final UFMP. This analysis will inform the implementation strategy and the benchmarks of the short- and long-term goals used to measure City progress toward its canopy cover goals.
Dudek will also analyze the City’s fire-prone areas. Wildfires have increasingly impacted urban areas, particularly those in the WUI. Dudek will assess the City’s fire prone areas by performing an informal survey of representative tree species as identified in the tree inventory (Task 2). Experienced fire protection planners/urban foresters will summarize the DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 148
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 294
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 18 existing condition, and based on findings, will tailor a chapter of the UFMP to address wildfire hazard reduction. In addition, Dudek will include recommendations for ordinance/policy updates that regulate planting and tree management in the fire hazard zones and that clearly indicate the responsibilities of property owners regarding tree maintenance.
Additionally, Dudek can prepare a wildfire hazard analysis of the City’s WUI areas using fire behavior modeling software under a separate scope of work. Our team of fire protection planners has extensive experience using BehavePlus, FlamMap, and FARSITE fire behavior/fire spread models to map and model landscapes. These models consider fuels, terrain, weather, and other landscape features to predict fire intensity, flame length, and ember production. Through this effort, priority areas for mitigation projects can be identified with an ultimate goal of reducing the City’s exposure to wildfire threats.
Task 3.1.2 Tree Equity Score Analysis
To determine if the City has enough trees proportionally dispersed so all community members experience the benefits that trees provide, Dudek will calculate the City’s Tree Equity Score (https://www.treeequityscore.org). A method developed by the nonprofit American Forests, the Tree Equity Score evaluates existing tree canopy, population density, income, employment, race, age, and surface temperature data at the neighborhood scale. The resulting neighborhood scores will help identify areas of the City that are lacking trees and determine which areas to prioritize, as the UFMP is developed.
Task 3.1.3 Recommendations for Strategic Tree Planting
Dudek will develop a list of recommended species to accompany the assessment of tree planting opportunities by determining spacing limitations in the ground and air that restrict where trees can be planted and what species are appropriate for the locations. Spacing restrictions include parkway and median sizes, utility lines, intersections, streetlights, and other components of City infrastructure. The presence or absence of conflicting infrastructure will determine whether a tree can be planted in a particular location and the size of the tree that can be planted in the location. Dudek urban foresters will use this information to employ the standard urban forestry principle of “right tree, right place” and further refine where trees can be planted; they will also use the information to determine appropriate tree species to plant in strategic locations for safety and care, maximum greenhouse gas absorption, economic impact, cultural benefit, and wildfire safety.
Task 4: Status of the Urban Forest
Task 4.1 Establish Tree Canopy Goals
Based on the canopy cover analysis, Dudek will work with the City to develop canopy cover goals that are measurable and achievable. The GIS analysis of canopy cover within the City’s various land cover types would be taken into consideration when developing the City’s canopy cover goals. Dudek will develop a long-term planting plan to achieve canopy cover goals. In collaboration with the City, Dudek will establish a 50-year canopy cover goal for the City, and Dudek will calculate tree planting scenarios and metrics required to achieve the canopy cover goal. The analysis will also discuss the expanded benefits that could be achieved by increasing the City’s tree canopy, and how the City can combat climate change and mitigate heat impacts through maintaining and growing a healthy urban forest.
Task 4.2 Tree Inventory Sustainability Analysis
We will begin by analyzing the canopy cover assessment and inventory data of the publicly managed urban forest’s species composition, health distribution and overall condition, canopy extent, and age distribution. The analysis DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 149
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 295
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 19 will provide a framework for determining the City’s tree canopy goals as they apply to the urban forest’s health, equity, and related community benefits.
The analysis will also identify tree management recommendations that target specific problems and help form the basis of incremental milestone goals (i.e., 5-year, 10-year, and long-term goals). Dudek will work with the City to develop long- and short-term canopy cover goals and stocking level goals for each of the City’s zoning designations based on industry standards. Calculations for tree planting scenarios will be conducted for 5- and 10- year goals as well as longer-term goals, indicating how many trees will need to be planted each year to meet canopy and stocking level goals. Dudek will also provide recommendations for the preservation and sustainability of the City’s tree canopy, as well as identify priority areas for tree planting efforts to increase equitable canopy cover and enhance the City’s walking and biking routes.
Task 4.3 Environmental Services and Economic Value of Inventory Dudek will use i-Tree software to analyze the tree inventory and to calculate the economic value of the City’s urban forest and the cost benefits of strategic tree and forest investments. The ecosystem services we will examine include carbon sequestration, average pollutant capture, avoided runoff, avoided emissions, and structural and functional value. Dollar amounts will be provided for these benefits, which will be useful for education, long-term planning, and securing tree program funding. We will calculate the City’s return on investment into its urban forest by measuring the current level of investment (ongoing maintenance and management related costs) against what the City receives in ecosystem services and the urban forest’s asset value.
Task 5: Tree Management
Task 5.1 Identify Best Management Practices
Development of this section of the UFMP will include a review of City management practices, standards, details, and design practices that relate to trees within the City. Existing management practices will be measured against ISA and American National Standards Institute standards, current research, and experience of the consultant team. Existing guidelines to be reviewed include the following:
▪ Tree planting
▪ Establishment Care
▪ Pruning Cycles
▪ Pest Control
▪ Yearly Mitigation Plantings
▪ Community Involvement Opportunities
Based on this review process, we will document the City’s current maintenance procedures, provide a summary of our analysis and comparable City standards, make recommendations for altering the maintenance strategies based on best practices, and provide justification for the recommended revisions. Dudek will use the analysis to work with the City on developing best management practices that are specific for the City.
Task 5.2 Recommended Tree Species List
Dudek will develop a comprehensive tree species list for use for future tree plantings that includes a discussion of trees in developed public property (i.e., sidewalks, streets, medians, and landscaped parks), and parkway and median sizes. The list of recommended tree species will be suitable for the City’s current environmental conditions as well as anticipated conditions caused by climate change. To complete this task, Dudek will utilize the tree inventory data, Water Use Classification of Landscape Species research, climate change research, and a comparison of City tree inventories with anticipated future annual temperatures of the City to assess the following:
▪ Appropriateness of the type of tree by location (“right tree, right place”) DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 150
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 296
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 20 ▪ Appropriateness for future climate conditions
▪ Low water use
▪ Pest and disease vulnerability
▪ Appropriate planting of numbers of species to achieve species diversity goals of UFMP Task 5.3 Summary of Hazard Tree Species and Management Recommendations Dudek ISA TRAQ arborists will utilize the City tree inventory data, current research, and knowledge of local species to analyze which tree species pose an elevated level of risk and potential steps to mitigate the risk associated with the species. The analysis will provide recommendations with steps to identify trees with hazards and management practices to mitigate the risk when tree preservation is possible. While tree preservation is preferred, it is not reasonable or feasible to preserve every tree in the urban landscape. As such, this section will also provide strategies to selectively remove and replace trees over an extended period of time so canopy cover levels can be maintained for both current and future residents. Finally, the analysis will identify certain species that may be desirable to limit the use of planting in the urban landscape.
Task 5.4 Department Interviews
Following the project kickoff meeting, we will meet with representatives from City departments that are involved in design and/or management activities that may also directly affect tree preservation and green infrastructure design or planning efforts within the City. The intent of the department interviews will be to review the following:
▪ Existing tree management and protection policies and regulations in comparison to model tree ordinances for potential changes
▪ Internal protocol and processes for design, tree removal requests, pruning, use of inventory database and GIS, and other maintenance and tree planting activities conducted by the departments ▪ Financial and human resources dedicated to urban forestry management, plan review, and permitting ▪ Potential future tree management or planting activities ▪ City ordinances, regulations, and permits in place that affect tree management, tree protection, tree removal, or tree planting
▪ Goals, policies, and priorities of each department that relate to tree management, tree protection, or tree planting ▪ Governance structure and internal efficiencies
▪ Urban forest program funding
Following the interviews, we will summarize all relevant information from each department. This information will be an important component in developing the management goals of the UFMP. We will provide meeting minutes summarizing the major discussions from each interview. We expect that up to 8 interviews will be needed for this task.
Task 5.5 Governance Structure, Budget, and Staffing Levels Sustainable management of a City’s tree inventory depends on appropriate budget and staffing levels. For this task, Dudek will first identify the current governance structure of City tree management, the departments and staff involved, and their roles in tree management. The review will determine if the current structure is sufficient to support tree management or if improvement is needed in staffing levels, staff training, or efficiencies in interdepartmental communications and implementation of programs and policies.
Following budget and staffing review, we will conduct an analysis of the City’s tree program over the past five years to understand how funding has previously been allocated. The analysis will consider costs by annual DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 151
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 297
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 21 performance measurements of management actions, such as number of trees planted, cared for, pruned, removed, and other metrics. The analysis will generate a cost for the City to complete each of the listed management tasks. Following this review, Dudek will determine if the current budget supports the ideal level of service and provide a recommended budget to meet the needs of the City.
Task 6: Tree Ordinances, Policies, and Planning Documents Task 6.1 Review of City’s Tree Ordinance and Municipal Code For this task, Dudek will focus on a comprehensive review of the City’s tree ordinances and related municipal codes to ensure that they meet the standards of sustainable urban forest management. We will review the ordinances and codes to understand if they have clearly defined parameters for when a tree is considered protected and the process by which requests are considered for the removal of preserved trees. We will also examine if replacement planting requirements are directed towards the urban forest goals of the City and if penalties are sufficient to deter violation of the ordinance.
Dudek will provide a comparative analysis of nearby municipal urban forest programs and ordinances to evaluate how the City’s ordinance compares. The analysis will specifically address removing tree assets within the public right-of-way and adding hazardous tree assets in the WUI. This analysis will also include a discussion of policies that might be appropriate to implement with new development.
Task 6.2 Review of Existing City Planning Documents
Dudek will conduct a comprehensive review of the City’s urban forest policies and planning documents, including the General Plan, Climate Action Plan, and CWPP. The analysis of the section seeks to clarify current tactics and identify areas for improvement so that the City meets the standards of sustainable urban forest management.
Task 6.3 Development of Tree Preservation and Management Ordinance Dudek will summarize the review of the City’s Tree Preservation and Management Ordinance and provide a set of recommendations for future modifications to the tree ordinance and municipal code. The recommendations will ensure that the ordinance is consistent with the UFMP, General Plan, Climate Action Plan, and CWPP. We will also assist the City to determine the best language and structure for an impact fee for the removal of existing trees on both public and private property. Development of recommendations will be based on promoting sustainable urban forestry practices and will draw from the information gathered during Tasks 6.1 and 6.2.
Task 7: Community Engagement
Long-term community involvement and education is an important component of any successful UFMP program.
Dudek recognizes that each city is unique and requires a tailor-made community engagement plan to meet community member needs. The Dudek team will first consult with City staff to identify stakeholders, key residents, and/or organizations to accomplish City goals and priorities for fostering diverse community member participation and public education avenues. The following community outreach activities are based on the core values and public participation goals of the International Association for Public Participation and aim to ensure that those affected by City tree management have a voice in how City trees are managed:
▪ Inform: To provide the public with balanced and objective information to assist them in understanding the problem, alternatives, and/or solutions.
▪ Consult: To obtain public feedback on analysis, alternatives, and/or decisions.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 152
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 298
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 22 ▪ Involve: To work directly with the public throughout the process to verify that public concerns and aspirations are consistently understood and considered. ▪ Collaborate: To partner with the public in each aspect of the decision, including the development of alternatives and the identification of the preferred solution. ▪ Empower: To place final decision making in the hands of the public.
Task 7.1 In-Person Engagement Activities
Task 7.1.1 Outreach Events
We will coordinate and host a series of community
outreach efforts to better understand public
perspectives and priorities related to tree and urban
forest management. Outreach efforts will be targeted to communities that may not be able to participate in webbased outreach activities like a virtual meeting or online survey. Dudek will work with the City and
stakeholders to identify and reach these communities
through public events, such as a farmers’ market, youth sporting events, or neighborhood association meetings.
Dudek anticipates attending up to four (4) public
outreach events. The first round of two (2) outreach
events will occur prior to the Urban Forest Summit
(described below). Dudek staff will attend these events with interactive, educational boards to better understand stakeholder values and opinions of trees and provide information about the upcoming Urban Forest Summit and UFMP process. Hard copies of the online survey (described below) will be made available as well. The second round of two (2) public outreach events will occur during the public comment period of the draft UFMP. At these events, Dudek will highlight key findings, guiding principles, and the strategic plan to encourage discussion with event attendees so that the UFMP reflects stakeholder values. The public will be encouraged to provide written comments that will be used to further refine the draft UFMP. Following the public outreach events, we will deliver a summary report to the City on the public input received.
Task 7.1.2 Urban Forest Summit
We will coordinate and host one (1) Urban Forest Summit in partnership with the City and the working group (described in Task 7.2.2) to engage with City community members and organizations. With shifting dynamics in COVID-19 protocols, we anticipate in-person gatherings that adhere to all public safety guidelines. The Urban Forest Summit will take place on a day and time that is determined by City staff and the working group that would yield maximum participation across all City sectors and demographics. The summit will run approximately two to three hours to allow ample time for deep conversations on the important issues stakeholders want to address.
The Urban Forest Summit will take place approximately 5 months into the UFMP process and serve as an informative and interactive brainstorming event. Key findings on the current status of the City urban forest will be identified by the consultant team and the working group. Community members will be led through a series of guided brainstorming exercises to identify key successes, barriers, and desires for the City’s urban forest.
Community members will be provided a space to share the obstacles and opportunities related to growing and Outreach event for the City of Temecula
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 153
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 299
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 23 maintaining trees on their property and the challenges and successes they observe with City tree management.
Members of the community have a direct relationship with the City’s urban forest and are key to developing the vision, guiding principles, goals, and objectives of the UFMP.
Task 7.2 Online Engagement Activities
Task 7.2.1 Online Survey
Our experience with community engagement indicates that online surveys result in significantly higher public input than surveys conducted during community meetings. As such, we will develop a multilingual online survey using the SurveyMonkey platform. Questions will consist of topics related to urban forest values, perceived benefits of trees, and ways the City can support community tree planting efforts. Demographic questions will be included as well, so that our survey is equitably distributed and representative of the City’s community members. If desired, Dudek will work with the City to distribute paper surveys to a random sample of households to solicit input from residents that may not have access to the internet or a Wi-Fi-enabled device. Results of the surveys will be compiled in an electronic file, summarized, and included in the UFMP.
Task 7.2.2 Working Group
Urban forest management within any city includes multiple actors across all levels of city staff, elected officials, community organizations, and community members, with each actor playing a different role in creating a healthy urban forest. Dudek would assist the City in assembling a working group that would be designed to bring individuals together and provide the community with a role in creating a management plan that addresses their priorities, issues, and goals. A UFMP that reflects the community is more likely to be implemented upon completion and result in achieving goals of the City urban forestry program.
Working group members would be selected based on criteria developed by Dudek and the City, and in partnership with local nonprofit organizations, to verify that a broad range of City staff, elected officials, community-based organizations, and community members are represented. The objectives of the working group meetings will be the following:
▪ Create a vision statement for the City’s urban forest ▪ Identify priority issues to address in the UFMP
▪ Develop short-, medium-, and long-term goals
▪ Identify priority needs to address through public education ▪ Develop a strategy for public education
▪ Review the 80% complete version of the draft UFMP document Four (4) working group meetings will be held throughout the development of the UFMP to complete these goals and objectives. Dudek will facilitate these meetings and share relevant research and information to assist in developing the UFMP goals.
Task 7.2.3 Collaboration with Community Based Organizations Dudek will work with the City to identify local non-profit and community-based organizations to increase awareness of the UFMP process, participation in the online survey, and Urban Forest Summit. To do so, Dudek will lead up to two (2) virtual information sessions for the identified partnering organizations. The meeting will occur prior to the Urban Forest Summit and will inform stakeholders of what a UFMP is, the UFMP process, the DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 154
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 300
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 24 important value the partnering organizations bring to the project, and how they can support participation in engagement activities. The second meeting will occur during the public comment phase on the draft UFMP. The virtual meetings will be a guided discussion to solicit direct input and feedback on the draft UFMP and strategic plan to ensure community stakeholder values are represented accurately in the UFMP. The intended result of this task is to ensure key stakeholders support the UFMP process and the implementation of the strategic plan.
Task 7.2.4 Social Media
Dudek’s marketing and graphics team will create social media content for the City to disseminate information about the UFMP process and public engagement opportunities, including the public survey and the Urban Forest Summits. Social media content will be uniquely designed to fit the City’s desired image.
Task 7.3 Supporting Materials
Dudek’s marketing and graphics team will prepare multilingual outreach materials that will communicate the value of the City’s urban forest through infographics. With input from key stakeholders and the City, we will identify strategic media outlets for these outreach materials, such as social media, radio, local television, newspapers, and other venues to engage the public in the UFMP process.
Task 8: Strategic Plan
Task 8.1.1 Strategic Plan Framework
Based on our comprehensive analyses, data synthesis, interviews, and community engagement activities, Dudek will create an actionable strategic plan for the City’s urban forest that will guide it to its vision for a new 50-year tree canopy cover goal. The strategic plan will follow a logical order and will include the following:
▪ Vision. A statement will be created to establish a vision for the future of the urban forest. This statement will verify that there is a common understanding of the UFMP outcome. ▪ Guiding Principles. Dudek will further refine the vision statement into specific categories based on City, working group, and community member values.
▪ Goals. Dudek will identify the outcomes that the City seeks to achieve for each guiding principle. Goals will be specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and time sensitive. ▪ Actions. Dudek will identify specific tasks that contribute to the goals and that need to be taken to achieve the vision of the UFMP.
Task 8.1.2 Implementation Plan
Following the completion of the strategic plan, Dudek will work with the City and working group to develop an implementation plan that provides the framework for how the actions will be carried out. The implementation plan will prioritize objectives into 3–5-year milestones for the first 20 years, identify who will be responsible to verify the objective is completed, and identify what costs or funding sources are needed to complete the objective. The goal of the implementation plan is to verify that the strategic plan is successfully carried out to achieve the urban forest’s long-term vision.
Task 8.1.3 Monitoring Plan
The UFMP is an adaptive document that should be reviewed periodically to verify that the goals and objectives are realistic and obtainable based on changes to the City’s environmental and economic conditions. The specific DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 155
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 301
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 25 actions for periodic review are contained within the monitoring plan and will provide measurable outcomes to determine progress toward the completion of goals and objectives.
Dudek recommends using the Community Assessment and Goal-Setting tool as a main component of the monitoring plan to ensure that the City has a clearly defined process to understand the success of implementing the UFMP goals and objectives. Vibrant Cities Lab is a collaboration of the United States Forest Service, American Forests, and the National Association of Regional Councils, and serves as an online hub of urban forest and tree research, best practices, and planning tools (http://vibrantcitieslab.com). The Community Assessment and GoalSetting Tool is based on research of urban forest sustainability and establishes criteria and indicators to measure urban forest sustainability. The tool works by stating a desired condition of an urban forest and asking the user to rate the current level of this condition in the City using a numerical rating. It then asks for another numerical rating to indicate what the desired goal for that condition is. At the end of the 28-question survey, the user is provided a total score for the current urban forest status and a total score for the goal status. The difference between these two numbers is the gap between the current status and a sustainable UMFP.
Task 9: UFMP Development and Presentations
The goal of the final UFMP document is to clearly display the key findings, strategic plan, and other pertinent data so stakeholders understand the important steps in developing a healthy and robust urban forest and are encouraged to take action. As such, Dudek will create a document the City can use to disseminate the UFMP results over a large audience.
The UFMP will include a user-friendly, 30-page executive summary that will be graphic based and present the UFMP’s major findings and recommendations. The remainder of the technical information and graphics will be provided in the body of the UFP to illustrate important concepts, analysis methods, and supplemental information.
Task 9.1 UFMP Development
Task 9.1.1 Outline
Dudek anticipates first developing one content outline by chapter before proceeding with development of the UFMP product. The content outline will be established to verify that the project meets the required elements and goals of the City. This content outline will be submitted to the City for review and comment within 14 calendar days of project initiation.
Task 9.1.2 Administrative Draft and Public Draft
Dudek will submit an administrative draft to City staff within 9 months from the day of the commencement of work, and a second public draft, including all revisions, within 60 calendar days of receiving City comments on the first draft submittal. We request that the appropriate City personnel provide comments on the first draft within a 4-week time frame. These edits will be incorporated, and the second draft will be made available to the public for review and comment. Dudek will coordinate with the City to post the second draft on its website and other important media channels. A dedicated email address and set of public comment instructions will be created by Dudek to facilitate receipt and organization of public comments. The open period for public review and comment of the draft of the UFMP will be 30 calendar days. The second draft will be submitted as an electronic copy in Adobe PDF and will include all figures and appendices.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 156
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 302
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 26 Task 9.1.3 Final Draft
Following completion of the public draft review process, the final UFMP will be developed, incorporating City and public comments, and will be completed by July 15, 2023. The final copy will be submitted as an electronic copy in Adobe PDF, along with 10 hardbound copies and will include all figures and appendices. Dudek will prepare and submit the final UFMP within approximately 12 months from the start date of the contract.
Task 9.2 Presentationsto City Council and Planning Commission Dudek will present at two (2) Planning Commission meetings and three (3) City Council meetings to report on the UFMP process, results of the analysis, and recommendations that include adoption of a comprehensive tree ordinance. The final presentation will be directed towards the UFMP being adopted by City Council.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 157
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 303
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 27 Schedule
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 158
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 304
Consultant Services for the Development of a Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan 28 DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 159
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 305
Appendix A
Resumes
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 160
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 306
1 Ryan Allen
PROJECT MANAGER
Ryan Allen is an urban forester with 14 years’ experience providing strategic environmental planning to organizational programs. Mr. Allen’s work deepens the positive impact on the communities he serves and increases organizational capacity. Mr. Allen has experience working with elected officials and staff and building and maintaining strategic partnerships.
Project Experience
UFMP, City of Downey, California. Lead writer and developer of the City of Downey’s 30-year planning document to expand canopy cover, implement efficient management practices, and increase public awareness of the urban forest. This process has included analyzing the current tree inventory and canopy cover, calculating the ecological benefits of the urban forest using the i-Tree Eco suite, and determining the current value of the city’s trees. Reviewed current policies and ordinances against urban forest sustainability standards and will update these documents and create new policies as appropriate. Assessed the governance structure, interdepartmental protocols, and management practices of the City of Downey through departmental interviews with all staff who affect trees.
UFMP, City of Beverly Hills, California. Led the development of the City of Beverly Hills’ 30-year planning document to implement sustainable management practices to create a healthy urban forest canopy. Dudek also analyzed the city-managed tree population, completed a wildfire hazard assessment for an area designated a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, and provided recommendations to manage a more fire safe community.
UFMP, La Mesa, California. Led the development of the city’s UFMP document that included a thorough analysis of all management practices, a LiDAR canopy cover analysis, facilitation of a stakeholder-working group, interviews with all relevant city staff who affect trees, and analysis of the status of the urban forest. The goal of the UFMP was to help the City of La Mesa reach canopy cover and greenhouse gas emission reduction goals of their Climate Action Plan. CAL FIRE provided funding for the project, and project objectives will help the city achieve the outcomes of the grant.
Urban Forest Management Plan Preliminary Planning and Roadmap, City of Los Angeles, California. Prepared a comprehensive report on the current conditions of the City of Los Angeles urban forest and its management as the beginning phase of the city’s preparation to begin an urban forest management plan (UFMP). Developing the report was a 10-month long process that included monthly working group meetings with over 40 urban forest stakeholders, extensive departmental interviews, a public survey with 2,600 responses, and the comparison of Los Angeles urban forest activities with three other municipal urban forest programs. The report analyzes current funding levels and City of Los Angeles planning documents, ordinances, policies, governance structure, and management practices against urban forest sustainability standards. The result of the analysis delivered key findings on the status of the urban forest, and made recommendations on the steps the city needs to take to move toward the completion of a UFMP and implementing sustainable practices.
Education
Pepperdine University
BA, Communications,
(Creative Writing
emphasis)
Certifications
Certified Arborist,
No. WE 10316A
Tree Risk Assessment
Qualified
Municipal Specialist
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 161
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 307
2 Community Forest Management Plan, City of San Jose, California. Currently developing the San Jose Community Forest Management Plan driven by meaningful community engagement and technical expertise. Project tasks include analyzing the existing tree canopy cover using satellite imagery; conducting 17 interviews with city staff, elected officials, and stakeholders; creating a project webpage and outreach video; conducting a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis of current management practices; determining the condition of the city’s urban forest; educating; and developing achievable short- and long-term goals. The resulting Community Forest Management Plan (CFMP) clearly and concisely presented the complexities of urban forest management with accompanying easy-tointerpret graphics so that the document is understandable to seasoned urban foresters as well as the public.
UFMP, City of Rancho Cordova, California. Led the development of the city’s UFMP document in partnership with the City of Rancho Cordova and the Sacramento Tree Foundation. Highlights of the project include the development of an online survey, project webpage, and strategic tree planting plan; interviews with city staff; and a LiDAR canopy cover analysis. The project focused on development standards for new residential communities, to ensure land use planning incorporates trees into designs to create healthy tree-lined streets. The project determined the sustainability of the urban forest using an i-Tree analysis and an assessment of sustainability indicators. CAL FIRE provided funding for the project, and project objectives will help the city achieve the outcomes of the grant.
Green Neighborhood Program, Sacramento Tree Foundation, Sacramento, California. Lead program developer for Dudek in developing the Green Neighborhood Program in partnership with the Sacramento Tree Foundation, a non-profit urban forestry leader in the Sacramento region. The Green Neighborhood Program is a tool to help residential homebuilders develop neighborhoods for long-term health and sustainability by meaningfully incorporating trees. The program provides urban forestry best management practices for tree preservation, planning, species selection, tree placement, planting, and establishment care. Upon verification that each of the six steps of the program are successfully completed, program participants receive Green Neighborhood certification.
Development of this program included gathering input from a stakeholder working group, refining benchmark goals, managing the creation of a project webpage, and developing urban forestry guidelines and standard details.
On-Call Arborist, City of Pasadena, California. Serves as contract city arborist. Responsibilities include a variety of arboricultural tasks, from reviewing third-party arborist reports to informing city council members on urban forestry issues. Responsible for identifying nuisance trees, reviewing and evaluating urban forestry budgets, recommending measures to reduce or eliminate tree impacts, recommending mitigation measures for impacted trees, and being the primary contact for arboricultural-related issues.
Oak Tree and Woodland Evaluations and Monitoring, NBC Universal, Los Angeles, California. Provide ongoing monitoring and evaluation of oak trees and oak woodland on the Universal Studios site in Hollywood. Assist in ongoing site development by navigating City and County of Los Angeles protected tree ordinances. Review the health and safety of oak trees throughout the project site.
New York Drive Oak Tree Construction Monitoring, Los Angeles County Public Works, Altadena, California.
Monitored the construction related activities that impacted protected oak trees throughout the project area and implemented tree protection measures. Continuing to monitor the health and safety of the protected oak trees and provide regular reports to Los Angeles County after the completion of construction.
Victoria Gardens Tree Inventory and Evaluation, Carson, California. Conducted the assessment and GPS mapping of trees for proposed large-scale construction project. Trees were assessed according to size and health and for possible relocation. Trimble GPS units were used for mapping and each tree was tagged for identification.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 162
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 308
1 Dana Link-Herrera
DEPUTY PROJECT MANAGER
Dana Link-Herrera is an urban forestry and wildfire planner with 7 years’ experience and a strong foundation in environmental and urban planning. She has a diverse background in natural resource management, environmental analysis, permitting support, community outreach and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)/National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
Ms. Link-Herrera provides research, writing, analysis, and project management support on a variety of project types in rural, suburban, and urban communities. She has experience working with federal, state, and local agencies, as well as with public universities and tribal communities. She works collaboratively with Dudek’s certified arborists, fire planners, and licensed foresters to prepare urban forest management plans, fire protection plans, community wildfire protection plans, and technical analyses in accordance with CEQA/NEPA and local/regional policies. She is experienced in conducting site visits and field work, interpreting data to provide comprehensive canopy cover analyses, conducting canopy equity analyses, completing regulatory setting research, reviewing and developing plans/policies/ordinances, and performing community outreach. Ms. Link-Herrera is skilled at synthesizing technical information into planning documents and reports and provides a comprehensive approach to environmental planning.
Project Experience
Urban Forest Management Plan, City of Temecula, California. Served as deputy project manager and co-authored the City of Temecula Urban Forest Management Plan, in accordance with CAL FIRE grant guidelines. Worked with GIS staff to conduct a canopy cover analysis using LiDAR canopy cover data.
Analyzed canopy cover equity using canopy data, CalEnviroScreen, urban heat island data, and American Forest’s Tree Equity Score tool. Reviewed the city’s existing plans, policies, and practices to develop recommendations for long range planning for the urban forest. Conducted stakeholder interviews and community outreach efforts, including planning and hosting an Urban Forest Summit, which was a public engagement event to solicit community feedback.
Urban Forest Management Plan, City of La Mesa, California. Co-authored the City of La Mesa Urban Forest Management Plan in accordance with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) grant guidelines. The urban forest management plan will serve as a guidance document to help the city increase canopy cover to mitigate climate change impacts and provide a healthy, equitable urban forest. Worked with geographic information system (GIS) staff to conduct a canopy cover analysis using LiDAR canopy cover data. Developed canopy cover goals and calculated tree planting scenarios. Conducted analysis of canopy equity and identified tree planting opportunity areas using CalEnviroScreen and urban heat island data. Reviewed and analyzed existing city planning documents and policies, and provided recommendations for improved planning and management of trees in the City of La Mesa.
Education
California State
Polytechnic University,
Pomona
MURP, Urban and
Regional Planning
University of California,
San Diego
BA, International Studies
(Environmental Studies
minor)
Professional Affiliations
American Planning
Association (APA)
Association of
Environmental
Professionals (AEP)
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 163
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 309
2 Urban Forest Management Plan, City of Rancho Cordova, California. Co-authored the City of Rancho Cordova Urban Forest Management Plan, in accordance with CAL FIRE grant guidelines. Worked collaboratively with Dudek GIS staff to conduct a canopy cover analysis, which separately analyzed developed and undeveloped portions of the city. Established canopy cover goals based on existing developed areas of the city and provided policy recommendations for future development in the city. Analyzed tree equity and identified tree planting opportunity areas using CalEnviroScreen and urban heat island data. Conducted review and analysis of existing plans, policies, and ordinances and contributed to development of a new tree protection ordinance.
Urban Forest Management Plan, City of Willits, California. Co-authored the City of Willits Urban Forest Management Plan, in accordance with CAL FIRE grant guidelines, with an emphasis on increasing canopy cover while maintaining and improving community character. Assisted with community outreach, stakeholder interviews, canopy cover analysis, and a review of existing city plans and policies to develop recommendations.
Urban Forest Master Plan, City of Chico, California. Served as deputy project manager and co-authored the City of Chico Urban Forest Master Plan, in accordance with CAL FIRE grant guidelines. Organized and conducted stakeholder interviews. Worked with GIS staff to conduct a canopy cover analysis using satellite imagery, including a canopy change analysis from 2005 to 2020. Analyzed canopy equity and identified priority areas for tree planting efforts using the canopy analysis, CalEnviroScreen, urban heat island data, and American Forest’s Tree Equity Score tool. Conducted review of existing city plans and policies to develop long range planning recommendations for the urban forest.
Santa Barbara Community Wildfire Protection Plan and Environmental Impact Report, City of Santa Barbara, California. Assisted with preparation of the Santa Barbara Community Wildfire Protection Plan and the accompanying program-level Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Worked collaboratively with the project team to prepare and update the citywide Community Wildfire Protection Plan and conduct an in-depth program-level environmental analysis in accordance with CEQA and local and regional policies, while meeting a firm project schedule. Served as lead author and conducted analysis of potential impacts to aesthetics and visual resources and recreation. The project is funded through a grant from CAL FIRE.
La Purisima Fuel Reduction Project, California Vegetation Treatment Program (CalVTP) Program EIR, Santa Barbara County Fire Department, California. Provided project management support and conducted analysis in accordance with CEQA for a vegetation reduction project under CAL FIRE’s CalVTP Program EIR. The project consists of vegetation treatment to create a fuel break along Purisima Ridge in northern Santa Barbara County.
Coordinated with Dudek technical staff and Santa Barbara County Fire Department staff to conduct site visits and complete technical analyses and a project-specific analysis. Created a mitigation monitoring and reporting program tracker to facilitate implementation of standard project requirements and mitigation measures.
Hitch Ranch Project Fire Protection Plan and EIR, City of Moorpark, California. Authored the CEQA wildfire analysis for the project, which includes single-family residential development and outdoor recreational space located in a very high fire hazard zone/wildland–urban interface area. Worked collaboratively with Dudek wildfire planners to incorporate technical information from the Fire Protection Plan (FPP) into the EIR section to provide a comprehensive wildfire analysis. The analysis included a review of the existing fire environment, fire behavior modeling for pre- and post-project conditions, proposed fuel modification zones, and mitigation measures for the project.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 164
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 310
1 Michael Huff, RCA
PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE
Michael Huff is founder and manager of Dudek’s Urban Forestry/Fire Protection Planning team with 29 years’ experience as a forester and fire protection planner.
Mr. Huff specializes in management of community-wide and project-specific fire protection plans (FPPs), wildland–urban interface (WUI) fire management plans, wildfire hazard reduction projects, California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) supporting technical documents, Oak Woodland impact and mitigation plans, urban and community forest management plans, forest and tree inventories, impact analysis studies, and tree hazard evaluations. Mr. Huff possesses considerable project issue resolution experience and focuses on working within the regulations to provide creative, cost-saving solutions to his clients. He routinely participates in public hearings, strategy sessions, and provides public presentations.
Project Experience
UFMP, City of Downey, California. Managed the preparation of a comprehensive UFMP, including graphically portraying common concepts and strategies. The project included analysis of tree inventory information, review of tree protection policies and climate adaptation plans, public and stakeholder surveys, setting up an urban forest working group, and goal setting.
UFMP, City of Beverly Hills, California. Managing the creation of a UFMP for Beverly Hills. Primary author of the Wildfire chapter that focuses on tree-related fire risks in the city’s northern reaches that are within very high fire hazard severity zones. The project is critically evaluating the city’s tree management practices, policies, and regulations, and providing a comprehensive path forward to meet city and resident stakeholder goals.
First Step to a UFMP, City Plants/City of Los Angeles, California. Managed this comprehensive analysis of the existing Los Angeles urban forest management approach, personnel, budgets, and policies. The project included extensive stakeholder outreach and coordination along with preparation of a comprehensive status document that critically evaluates how Los Angeles’ urban forest and its management compare with other well-run municipal urban forests.
The study sets the stage for Los Angeles to make significant changes to their current approach and provides a launching pad for the eventual creation of a complete UFMP. Dudek presented results at two large public meetings.
UFMP, National City, California. Prepared a city-wide UFMP for National City. The project included tree inventory of some 10,000 street and median trees, analysis of tree-provided benefits, assessment of the City’s urban forest, its tree policies and its management approach, and preparation of the comprehensive plan. To ensure that the tree resources are managed appropriately, a comprehensive community forest management plan was developed that includes an evaluation of the existing tree inventory, implementation of a long-term maintenance program, and a recommended tree replacement program.
Education
Northern Arizona University
BS, Forest Management
Certifications
Registered Consulting
Arborist (RCA)
Certified Arborist,
No. WE-4276A
San Diego County
Department of Planning
and Land Use-Approved
Fire Protection Planner
Laguna Beach Fire
Department-Approved
Fire Protection Planner
Certified Wildland
Fire Ecologist
Professional Affiliations
American Society of
Consulting Arborists
National Fire
Protection Association –
International
California Fire Chief’s
Association – Fire
Prevention Officers
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 165
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 311
2 UFMP, City of Irvine Public Works, California. Conducted analysis of city tree populations following collection of tree attribute information for over 50,000 city-owned trees. Analysis included species diversity and distribution, trim cycle breakdown, recommended species for future planting, park tree species, changes from initial plantings, and planting opportunity identification throughout the City.
Community Forest Management Plan, City of Carlsbad Public Works, California. Prepared a city-wide community forest management plan for the City of Carlsbad (City). The City has inventoried some 13,000 street and median trees as part of a city-wide GIS survey system. To ensure that the tree resources are managed appropriately, a comprehensive community forest management plan was developed that includes an evaluation of the existing tree inventory, implementation of a long-term maintenance program, and a recommended tree replacement program. In addition, the plan addresses the declining Hosp Grove, a large open space area forested with dying eucalyptus. The plan includes removal of nearly 9,000 dead and dying trees and replanting with native and drought-tolerant species.
City of Santa Barbara Wildland Fire Evacuation Procedures Analysis, Santa Barbara Fire Department,Santa Barbara, California. Mr. Huff managed a multi-disciplined team of fire protection planners, retired fire operations professionals, fire behavior modelers, and traffic engineers to analyze three high-probability wildfire scenarios and the existing evacuation conditions. The project was implemented to identify how evacuations during these wildfire scenarios could be made more efficient through road and traffic management improvements. Additionally, trigger thresholds were examined to determine when evacuations would need to be initiated given the wildfire scenarios and how that process could be improved. Temporary refuge sites were evaluated along with safety zones. Traffic engineers modeled congestion based on evacuation zone populations and helped define the types of pre- and during- emergency improvements and actions that would result in the ability to move more traffic from higher to lower exposure areas.
Preplan Map Conversion, Newport Beach Fire Department, California. Managed a project that involved creation of a database for “pre-planning” fire management in high-priority structures for the Newport Beach Fire Department (NBFD). This project involved the creation of digital access, layout and fire equipment maps, and associated property data for high-priority structures, which include hospitals, schools, apartments, and other high-occupancy buildings. Important components of the maps include site and building access and egress points, utilities, ventilation, elevators, and types of construction. These maps are also linked with associated property data that includes alarm and sprinkler conditions, property owner information, inspection schedules, and special hazard conditions. In addition, the maps are geo-referenced for future incorporation into the City of Newport Beach’s GIS.
Streetscape, Park, and Windrow Tree Inventory and Mapping, Public Works, City of Irvine, California. Leads this perpetual tree inventory effort to capture locations and tree attribute information for over 50,000 trees within the City of Irvine. Skilled arborists conduct tree inventory and assessment while using GPS and a customized data interface to capture tree positions.
On-Call Arboricultural Services, City of San Clemente, California. Responds to numerous requests for tree evaluations and assessments throughout the City of San Clemente. Tree evaluations often include assessment of potential sidewalk removal/installation impacts and assessment of trees exhibiting declining health. Provides objective analysis and reports regarding the trees from a sound arboricultural perspective.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 166
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 312
1 Abby Beissinger
URBAN FORESTER
Abby Beissinger is a plant pathologist and urban forester with 8 years’ experience implementing pest and pathogen management strategies in the green industry and commercial agriculture. Ms. Beissinger uses science-based recommendations to empower communities to make the best decisions when addressing plant health issues. She has worked closely with federal and state regulatory agencies to undertake new issues caused by invasive pests and pathogens, and her research has influenced State Department of Agriculture crop regulations in Connecticut and Washington. Ms. Beissinger’s expertise includes developing science-based plant health management plans; pathogen and insect diagnostics on trees, vegetables, fruit, and ornamental crops; community engagement; research and data analysis; and teaching.
Project Experience
Urban Forest Management Plan, City of Temecula, California. Co-led the development of the City of Temecula’s Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP).
Facilitated client meetings, stakeholder interviews, and project coordination.
Reviewed inventory data to analyze the current status of the urban forest and identified threats to current species based on predicted climate change and invasive pests/pathogens. The plan will align with the City’s core steering document, Quality of Life Master Plan, to ensure the UFMP will be successfully implemented. This project is expected to be complete in November 2022.
Street Tree Master Plan, City of Downey, California. Analyzed GIS data and conducted fieldwork to assess all street tree planting opportunity sites throughout the City of Downey. The Street Tree Master Plan showcased maps of the City’s 16 maintenance districts and identified a comprehensive list of tree species to be planted by measuring all of the City’s public rights-of-way, identifying utility line presence, determining tree species diversity, and considering predicted changes to climatic conditions.
UFMP, City of La Mesa, California. Served as coauthor for the City of La Mesa’s UFMP. Led the analysis and interpretation of i-Tree Canopy data, inventory data, current status of the City’s urban forest, pest and pathogen management, and community engagement sections.
Community Forest Management Plan, City of San José, California. Served as coauthor for the City of San José’s CFMP. Supported the community engagement, current status of the urban forest, diversity and inclusion, recommendations, and monitoring plan chapters of the document.
UFMP, City of Willits, California. Served as lead author for the City of Willits’s UFMP. Led the analysis and interpretation of i-Tree Canopy data, inventory data, status of the City’s urban forest, pest and pathogen management, budget and staffing, and community engagement sections. Facilitated all client meetings, stakeholder interviews, and project coordination.
Education
Washington State
University
MS, Plant Pathology
University of WisconsinMadison
BA with distinction,
Anthropology
Professional Affiliations
American
Phytopathological Society
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 167
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 313
2 UFMP, City of Beverly Hills, California. Served as coauthor for the City of Beverly Hills’s UFMP. Supported the preparation of the 90% draft and final draft of the document.
UFMP, City of Rancho Cordova, California. Served as coauthor for the City of Rancho Cordova’s UFMP. Led the analysis and interpretation of i-Tree Canopy data, inventory data, current status of the City’s urban forest, and community engagement sections.
UFMP, City of Chico, California. Co-led the development of the City of Chico’s UFMP. Designed and executed the City’s first Urban Forest Summit, an interactive community engagement event that increased diversity and representation of community input in the planning process. Reviewed inventory data to analyze the current status of the urban forest. Co-led working group meetings. Facilitated client meetings, stakeholder interviews, and project coordination. This project is expected to be complete in November 2022.
Tree Program Review, City of Oxnard, California. Led the development of the City’s Tree Program Review, which included an analysis of the City’s tree inventory, interviews with City tree managers, creation of a recommended street tree planting palette, funding scenarios, ordinance and policy review, and identification of tree species threatened by the effects of climate change.
Oak Tree and Woodland Analysis, NBC Universal, Los Angeles, California. Provided analysis and interpretation of tree assessment data for protected trees on the Universal Studios site in Hollywood. Navigated protected tree ordinances for the City and County of Los Angeles. Reviewed the health and safety of oak trees throughout the project site.
Invasive Shothole Borer Regional Priority Plan, Inland Empire Resource Conservation District, San Bernardino County, California. Served as deputy project manager for a 3-year effort to develop a Regional Priority Plan that sets management actions and standards for invasive shothole borer (ISHB) in San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. The Regional Priority Plan will take into account 2 years of field trapping data, a large-scale literature review, changes in forest distribution via aerial imagery, and other factors to identify the leading edge of the zone of infestation, and prioritize demonstration projects to help slow the spread of ISHB.
ISHB Monitoring, OC Waste, San Juan Capistrano, California. Established plots in riparian areas to monitor protected trees for signs and symptoms of ISHBs. Collected samples, analyzed data, and provided management recommendations and treatment options.
ISHB Monitoring, Rancho Mission Viejo, San Juan Capistrano, California. In partnership with University of California Cooperative Extension and OC Parks, monitored target host species for signs and symptoms of ISHBs and documented if trees were responsive to chemical treatment. Provided management recommendations and GIS deliverables.
Canary Island Date Palm Health and Structural Assessments Decay Study, City of Newport Beach, California.
Interpreted Level 2 Risk Assessment data and soil analysis results to determine a plant health management plan for selected Canary Island date palms (Phoenix canariensis) in Newport Beach. Prepared a letter report with findings and recommendations.
Eucalyptus Internal Decay Study, City of Irvine, California. Analyzed tree health assessment data from blue gum eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) trees within the City of Irvine’s historic eucalyptus windrows. Mitigation and management recommendations were made to City staff based on levels of decay. This project is one of the largest sonic tomography projects conducted in North America.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 168
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 314
1 Christopher Kallstrand
URBAN FORESTER
Christopher Kallstrand is an urban forestry specialist for Dudek’s urban and community forestry group. Mr. Kallstrand has 17 years’ experience providing technical assistance on projects ranging from arboricultural assessments and large-scale oak management plans to biological resources monitoring. These projects include assessment and inventory of oak woodlands, managing and monitoring the relocation and preservation of trees on development sites, surveys of native trees and vegetation, post-burn damage assessments, landscape tree appraisal, GPS mapping, environmental and biological resources monitoring, data analysis, and preparation of assessment reports and oak management and preservation plans. In addition, Mr. Kallstrand routinely uses geographic information systems (GIS) and aerial photography in mapping, analysis of resource data, preparation of project plans, and conducting project impact analyses. He also holds a BS in forestry and natural resource conservation.
Project Experience
Streetscape, Park, and Windrow Tree Inventory and Mapping, City of Irvine Public Works, Orange County, California. Field forester for this perpetual tree inventory effort to capture locations and tree attribute information for 50,000+ trees within the City of Irvine. Conducts tree inventory and assessment while using GPS and a customized data interface to capture tree positions.
City of Encinitas, California. Serves as contract city arborist. Responsibilities include a variety of arboricultural tasks, from reviewing third-party arborist reports to informing city council members on urban forestry issues. He is responsible for identifying nuisance trees, evaluating applications for Urban Forest Advisory Committee members, advising the Urban Forest Advisory Committee, reviewing and evaluating urban forestry budgets, updating city tree species lists, recommending measures to reduce or eliminate tree impacts, recommending mitigation measures for impacted trees, and being the primary contact for arboricultural-related issues.
City of Laguna Beach, California. Serves as on-call city arborist. Routinely performs level 2 and 3 risk assessments for potential tree removals in the City. Level 2 and 3 risk assessments utilize best management practices for risk evaluations. Uses advanced technology to evaluate risk associated with trees throughout the City.
Heronry Tree Assessments and Inventory, Villa Venetia, Marina Del Rey, Los Angeles County, California. Assisted in the evaluation of 130 trees, including 5 trees being utilized as nesting sites for great herons (Ardea herodias).
Heronry trees are nest sites for herons and other birds, and can be negatively affected by the massive amounts of guano produced by the birds. Two trees were recommended for removal based on their poor health, which was the direct result of heavy guano deposits on the trees and on the soil beneath the trees. Recommendations also included the potential use of artificial trees as heron nesting sites.
Eucalyptus Windrow Internal Decay Evaluations, City of Irvine Public Works, Orange County, California. Currently evaluates the internal tree decay in the City of Irvine’s historic eucalyptus windrow trees. The evaluations includes the monitoring and evaluation of the city’s 2,000+ eucalyptus trees and provides external observations with likelihood of extensive internal decay.
Education
Iowa State University
BS, Forestry: Natural
Resource Conservation
Certifications
Certified Arborist,
No. WE-8208A
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 169
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 315
2 On-Call Arboricultural Services, City of San Clemente, Orange County, California. Routinely responds to numerous requests for tree evaluations and assessments throughout the city. Tree evaluations often include assessment of potential sidewalk removal/installation impacts and assessment of trees exhibiting declining health. Provides objective analysis and reports regarding the trees from a sound arboricultural perspective.
Fuel Modification Zone Analysis and Related GIS Delineations, Various Developers, Southern California. Field data collection for various fuel modification plan projects for residential development in Southern California. Field assessments include the data collection of existing vegetation types and fuel loads that are used to determine fuel model input and scenario outputs. In addition, routinely utilizes ARC GIS 9.3 to delineate fuel modification zones based on city and county ordinances.
Oak Tree Inventory and Evaluations, Various Clients, Southern California. Performed large- and small-scale evaluation of oak trees in communities throughout Orange, San Diego, and Riverside counties. The oak trees have typically been incorporated into development landscaping and, due to horticultural issues, were not performing well. Provided maintenance specifications and tree-by-tree recommendations for improving tree health.
Wildland–Urban Interface (WUI) Fuel Hazard Assessment, City of Newport Beach, Orange County, California. Assists with assessing, mapping, and documenting fire and fuel hazard conditions within the WUI protection area of the Newport Beach Fire Department. This is an ongoing annual project that involves an evaluation of existing vegetation conditions (species, density, continuity) and utilization of GIS in data analysis efforts. Field mapping efforts are enhanced by utilization of digital aerial photography and GPS technology to capture site-specific electronic resource information. In addition, site conditions are evaluated based on currently adopted fire codes, and recommendations are made for any corrective actions required. Data is also prepared for integration into the city’s GIS by linking field condition descriptions with geographic reference information, allowing access to relevant site information.
Tree Assessments and Arborist’s Report for Median Curb Replacement, Barranca Parkway, City of Irvine, Orange County, California. Curb replacement on both sides of a Barranca Parkway median required root disturbances for median trees, root removal, and backfill soil placement at back of curb. Evaluated postconstruction tree impacts and provided recommendations to minimize impacts. All trees were retained in place and provided special measures to reduce potential impacts.
Hazard Tree Removal Project, Southern California Edison (SCE), San Bernardino, San Gabriel, and Santa Rosa Mountains, California. The project involves the removal of bark beetle–infested trees, drought-stressed trees, and other damaged trees from the vicinity of SCE poles, lines, and other facilities. Routinely monitors tree removal activities for the avoidance of sensitive species. The project area encompasses 106 square miles, with an estimated 62,000 acres of tree removal, 22,000+ power poles, and 538 linear miles of utility lines.
Post Fire Emergency Biological Monitoring, Los Angeles County, California. Conducted on-site biological monitoring for post fire cleanup activities following the 2009 Station Fire to ensure the avoidance of impacts to potentially occurring sensitive and U.S. Forest Service threatened, endangered, and sensitive species.
Recycled Water Pipeline Installation through Oak Woodlands, Las Virgenes Municipal Water District, City of Calabasas, Los Angeles County, California. Supporting Dudek’s engineering and planning groups, provided tree inventory and mapping along with analysis of potential tree impacts from placement of a 24-inch underground pipeline near existing oak woodlands. Dudek’s analysis resulted in pipeline placement that reduced potential impacts to 37 oak trees to insignificant and a waiver by the California Coastal Commission for further review.
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 170
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 316
1 Douglas Nickles, RPF
AS-NEEDED URBAN FORESTRY SPECIALIST
Douglas Nickles is a fire protection planner with more than 30 years’ experience as a fire marshal, urban fire forester, open space planner, and licensed forester.
Mr. Nickles specializes in preparing fire protection plans, wildland-urban interface fire management plans, evacuation plans, multi-hazard emergency response plans, and forest and natural resource management plans. He possesses considerable experience in fire and building code life safety regulations, wildland urban interface development project planning and protection, emergency preparedness, emergency response planning, and public education and information. He also serves as a Co-Chair for the So Cal Fire Prevention Officer’s Wildland Urban Interface Committee. Mr. Nickles previously worked for the City of Glendale Fire Department, where he was responsible for vegetation management, wildland fire hazard mitigation, planning entitlement reviews, General Plan element updates, fire and building plan check, fire and life safety building inspections, fire code enforcement, hazardous materials program management, and industrial wastewater program management. He also has six years of forestry experience working for a forest and land management consulting firm in Northern California.
Relevant Previous Experience
Glendale Fire Department, Glendale, California. Served as assistant fire marshal. Administered all personnel and programs undertaken by the Fire Prevention Bureau including Vegetation Management, Hazardous Materials, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Used Oil Collection, Industrial Waste Water, Fire and Life Safety inspections, Plan Review and New Construction inspection. The Bureau operates with four interrelated units:
Administration, Development Services, Environmental Programs, and Special Projects/Prevention Programs.
Overall administrative functions include personnel management, training and career development, organizational planning and development, intra- and interdepartmental coordination, code enforcement, records management, revenue and budget management, code adoption, and development of policies and procedures. (2017–2019) Glendale Fire Department, Glendale, California. Served as fire prevention coordinator. Managed the Programmatic Inspection Unit with oversight responsibility for multiple programs. Oversee all inspection and regulatory operations and professional staff. Oversee annual fire and life safety inspection program for state mandated and permitted facilities. Make recommendations for enforcement of fire and life safety requirements.
Prepare reports regarding code violations; issue violation notices; initiate enforcement as necessary. Direct all regulatory activities, inspections and reporting for the City's Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) and related hazardous materials management programs. Meet regularly with regional and state agencies to discuss and coordinate regulatory and enforcement activities. Oversee the Industrial Wastewater Inspection Program; coordinate with the City of Los Angeles. Oversee the Household Hazardous Waste Collection and Used Oil Curbside Collection Programs. Oversee the Vegetation Management Program. (2014–2017) Education
California Lutheran
University
MBA, Business
Administration
Humboldt State University
BS, Forestry (Fire
Management
concentration)
Certifications
Registered Professional
Forester (RPF), No. 2135
Wildland Fire Behavior
Certificate, County of Los
Angeles Fire Department
Archeology Certificate,
CAL FIRE
Incident Information
Officer Certificate, CAL
FIRE
Professional Affiliations
SoCal Fire Prevention
Officers Association
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 171
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 317
2 Glendale Fire Department, Glendale, California. Served as fire prevention coordinator. Managed the Fire Engineering Unit. Oversaw all plan check operations and professional staff. Evaluate and analyze plans, structures and processes to ensure adequate fire protection and conformance with federal, state and local fire safety laws and regulations. Planning entitlement reviews including Conditional Use Permits, CEQA and Environmental Impact Reports. Interpret fire and life safety laws and regulations and provide technical advice and assistance to the general public and other City departments, architects, contractors, engineers, builders, and owners. Assist with code adoption and enforcement activities. Assist with preparation and updating of General Plan Elements including Safety, Conservation and Open Space, and Recreation Elements. Oversee the Vegetation Management Program. (2004–2014)
City of Glendale Fire Department, Glendale, California. Served as urban fire forester. Managed the Vegetation Management Program. Responsibilities included start-up and development of the Vegetation Management Program including administration, inspection procedures and guidelines, preparation of program operations manual, development of policies and procedures, contract management and administration, and departmentwide training program. Grant application, administration and implementation for City projects. Coordinated establishment of a Firewise Community in Glendale, one of the first seven in the nation. Managed the Fire Prevention Public Education and Public Information programs. (1991–2004) City of Thousand Oaks, Thousand Oaks, California. Served as associate planner for the open space Joint Powers Authority between the City and Conejo Recreation and Park District. Responsibilities included daily administration of the agency and coordinating administrative support for public meetings. Established and served as support staff for the citizen advisory committee. (1988–1991)
Envicom Corporation/PHR Environmental, Calabasas, California. Served as environmental planner/analyst.
Prepared environmental impact reports and conducted research, site inspection, development plan preparation, and preparation of due diligence reports for major development projects throughout Southern California. (1988) HJW and Associates, Oakland, California. Served as forester, providing forest/natural resource management and timber harvesting consulting and contract administration services throughout Northern California. (1987-1988) Interface Management Services, Thousand Oaks, California. As owner, consults part time in resource management, land use planning, fire prevention, fire protection plan preparation, wildland fire safety, vegetation management, oak woodland management, and urban forestry, with an emphasis in wildland-urban interface settings throughout Southern California. (1985–Present) W.M. Beaty and Associates, Redding, California. Served as assistant district forester. Consulted in natural resource and forest management including timber harvesting, wildland fire protection, plantation management, and forest management plans throughout Northern California. (1979–1984) California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Served as forestry aide, assigned to Latour Demonstration State Forest in Shasta County assisting with forestry and natural resource management activities. (1979) California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Served as firefighter, assigned to Susanville in Lassen County in 1977, and Fortuna in Humboldt County in 1978. (1977–1978) DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 172
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 318
1 Kalie Ortiz
URBAN FORESTRY SPECIALIST
Kalie Ortiz is an urban forestry specialist with a background in forestry and an applied focus in hydrology. She has 2 years’ experience as a water equity organizer and community outreach coordinator for a nonprofit organization where she managed and supported urban forestry/water-related project development in the greater Los Angeles region. In addition, she has worked for the U.S. Forest Service collecting hydrologic data in Northern California to apply/design best management practice treatments to reduce sedimentation risks in impaired watersheds and analyzing forest inventory of mixed-conifer forests in the Sierra Nevada. Ms. Ortiz’s expertise in forestry and community engagement assists her as she contributes to the development of sustainable and equitable Urban Forest Management Plans.
Relevant Previous Experience
Water Equity Organizer, TreePeople, Los Angeles, California. Project development for the Disadvantaged Community and Tribal Involvement Program called WaterTalks in the Greater Los Angeles County. Provided knowledge on urban-water related topics such as drinking water, sanitation, stormwater management, flood control, and consumer costs. Provided support in engaging various stakeholders in watershed assessment, planning, project design and project advocacy. (2021)
Community Outreach Coordinator, TreePeople, Los Angeles, California. Managed a tree planting/care team in Southeast Los Angeles, reported quarterly inventory analysis reports to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, collected urban forest inventory, managed and organized various community outreach events, completed field work on restoration projects, responded to client and city official emails pertaining to Southeast LA Urban Canopy projects, and hosted virtual Tree Prioritization community meetings. (2020–2021) Forest Hydrologist-Intern, U.S. Forest Service – Six Rivers National Forest Supervisors Office, Eureka, California.
Assessed effectiveness of land management activities in protecting water quality through conducting best management practice monitoring. Conducted in-stream condition monitoring (pebble counts, channel crosssections, in-stream shade) and assisted in the analysis and preparation of the annual Six Rivers Water Quality Monitoring and Reporting document to the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. Applied and designed best management practice treatments to reduce chronic and storm driven sedimentation risks on U.S.
Forest Service roads in Total Maximum Daily Load impaired watersheds. Collected data/performed water crossing surveys using technical field equipment for Forest Service Road Decommissioning Project 2020 located along the Smith River National Recreation Area. (2019)
Forest Inventory and Analysis Intern, U.S. Forest Service – Sierra National Forest Supervisors Office, Fresno, California. Collected and analyzed forest inventory data (soil, tree height, tree diameter at breast height, stand age, tree mortality, understory vegetation, tree crown conditions, coarse woody debris, and lichen community composition) on various plots in the mixed-conifer forest of the Sierra Nevada. All data collected were input into U.S. Forest Service census. (2016)
Education
Humboldt State University
BS, Forestry, oncentration
in Hydrology
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 173
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 319
800.450.1818 | [email protected]
DUDEK.COM
DocuSign Envelope ID: FBC2C912-9869-4C32-B6B9-F256B5B58BC7 Item #13. Page 174
Meeting Date: 7/9/2024 / Packet Page #: 320
The City of Rancho Cucamonga
Request for Proposal (“RFP”) #21/22-011
for
Consultant Services for the Development of A Comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________