This MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (“MOU”) is made and entered into as of June 18, 2025, by and among the City of Glendora, (hereinafter referred to as Glendora), City of La Verne, (hereinafter referred to as La Verne), City of Pomona (hereinafter referred to as Pomona), Golden State Water Company (hereinafter referred to as Golden State) Rowland Water District (hereinafter referred to as Rowland), Walnut Valley Water District (hereinafter referred to as Walnut) and Three Valleys Municipal Water District (hereinafter referred to as Three Valleys). (Glendora, La Verne, Pomona, Golden State, Rowland, Walnut and Three Valleys are sometimes hereinafter referred to collectively as the “Parties” and individually as a “Party”).
RECITALS
A. Three Valleys is a Metropolitan Water District of Southern California member agency responsible for the delivery of supplemental water to its service area (Pomona, Walnut, and East San Gabriel Valleys).
B. Glendora is a retail member agency of Three Valleys and is the purveyor of water within its service area, which generally includes the area within its corporate boundaries.
C. La Verne is a retail member agency of Three Valleys and is the purveyor of water within its service area, which generally includes the area within its corporate boundaries.
D. Pomona is a retail member agency of Three Valleys and is the purveyor of water within its service area, which generally includes the area within its corporate boundaries.
E. Golden State is a retail member agency of Three Valleys and is the purveyor of water within its service areas which includes the cities of Claremont and San Dimas, as well as portions of Los Angeles County.
F. Rowland is a retail member agency of Three Valleys and is the purveyor of water within its service area, which includes portions of Rowland Heights, Hacienda Heights, La Puente, and the cities of Industry and West Covina.
G. Walnut is a retail member agency of Three Valleys and is the purveyor of water within its service area, which includes the city of Diamond Bar, and portions of the cities of Industry, Pomona, Walnut, West Covina and the easterly section of unincorporated Rowland Heights.
H. The Urban Water Management Planning Act of California (ACT) requires urban water suppliers to develop and submit a water management plan to achieve efficient water
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
FOR THE 2025 REGIONAL
URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
use and strengthen local drought planning.
I. The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) has developed guidelines for meeting the requirements of the ACT.
J. The parties have a common interest in creating a Regional Urban Water Management Plan (RUWMP) that will satisfy the requirements set forth by DWR.
K. Three Valleys has agreed to serve as the lead agency in the development of the RUWMP and will develop and issue a Request for Proposal (RFP), select a qualified vendor and enter into a Professional Services Agreement with the selected consultant on behalf of the Parties.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the faithful performance of the terms and conditions set forth herein, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
1 2025 RUWMP
1.1 Three Valleys will serve as the contract administrator for this effort and be the point of contact for the selected consultant.
1.2 Parties will work through Three Valleys with the selected consultant and provide the necessary information to meet the requirements set forth by DWR.
1.3 Parties will review draft documents and provide feedback as needed and meet all deadlines as set forth by Three Valleys to meet DWR deadlines for submittal of the RUWMP.
1.4 Three Valleys will submit the final RUWMP to DWR on behalf of the Parties. 2 Cost Share
2.1 Parties agree to share the costs as described in Exhibit A.
2.2 Three Valleys will pay costs up front and then seek reimbursement from the other Parties on a regular basis (i.e., monthly or quarterly).
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
FOR THE 2025 REGIONAL
URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto have caused this MOU to be executed by their duly authorized representatives of the PARTIES:
Three Valleys Municipal Water District
Matthew Litchfield, P.E.
General Manager/Chief Engineer
City of Glendora
Adam Raymond
City Manager
City of La Verne
Joe Vieyra
Director of Public Works
City of Pomona
Chris Diggs
Water Resources Director
Golden State Water Company
Ben Lewis Jr.
General Manager
Rowland Water District
Tom Coleman
General Manager
Walnut Valley Water District
Sherryl L. Shaw, P.E.
General Manager, Chief Engineer
Chris Diggs (Jun 9, 2025 15:40 PDT)
Chris Diggs
Adam Raymond (Jun 19, 2025 15:11 PDT)
Benjamin Lewis (Jun 20, 2025 09:52 PDT)
Benjamin Lewis
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
FOR THE 2025 REGIONAL
URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
EXHIBIT “A”
Cost Sharing Table
Agency Cost
Three Valleys MWD $180,016
City of Glendora $35,000
Golden State Water Company
Claremont and San Dimas $70,000
City of La Verne $35,000
City of Pomona $35,000
Rowland Water District $35,000
Walnut Valley Water District $35,000
Regional Urban Water Management Plan $425,016
2025 RUWMP MOU
Final Audit Report 2025-06-23
Created: 2025-06-04
By: Sylvie Lee ([email protected])
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAHg359eA_KkSQ9pprVFdWwwsrkLadp8UA "2025 RUWMP MOU" History
Document created by Sylvie Lee ([email protected])
2025-06-04 - 6:58:25 PM GMT
Document emailed to [email protected] for signature 2025-06-04 - 7:02:48 PM GMT
Email viewed by [email protected]
2025-06-04 - 8:09:24 PM GMT
Signer [email protected] entered name at signing as Sheryl L Shaw 2025-06-04 - 8:11:42 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Sheryl L Shaw ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2025-06-04 - 8:11:44 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to [email protected] for signature
2025-06-04 - 8:11:46 PM GMT
Email viewed by [email protected]
2025-06-09 - 8:44:25 PM GMT
Signer [email protected] entered name at signing as Tom Coleman 2025-06-09 - 8:46:31 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Tom Coleman ([email protected])
Signature Date: 2025-06-09 - 8:46:33 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to [email protected] for signature 2025-06-09 - 8:46:36 PM GMT
Email viewed by [email protected]
2025-06-09 - 10:29:53 PM GMT
Signer [email protected] entered name at signing as Chris Diggs 2025-06-09 - 10:40:26 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Chris Diggs ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2025-06-09 - 10:40:28 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to Joe Vieyra ([email protected]) for signature 2025-06-09 - 10:40:30 PM GMT
Email viewed by Joe Vieyra ([email protected])
2025-06-09 - 10:41:34 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Joe Vieyra ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2025-06-09 - 11:49:45 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to [email protected] for signature 2025-06-09 - 11:49:47 PM GMT
Email viewed by [email protected]
2025-06-10 - 2:14:26 AM GMT
New document URL requested by [email protected] 2025-06-19 - 10:09:20 PM GMT
Email viewed by [email protected]
2025-06-19 - 10:09:37 PM GMT
Signer [email protected] entered name at signing as Adam Raymond 2025-06-19 - 10:11:13 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Adam Raymond ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2025-06-19 - 10:11:15 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to Benjamin Lewis ([email protected]) for signature 2025-06-19 - 10:11:17 PM GMT
Email viewed by Benjamin Lewis ([email protected]) 2025-06-19 - 10:27:44 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Benjamin Lewis ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2025-06-20 - 4:52:10 PM GMT - Time Source: server Document emailed to Matthew Litchfield ([email protected]) for signature 2025-06-20 - 4:52:12 PM GMT
Email viewed by Matthew Litchfield ([email protected]) 2025-06-23 - 2:33:49 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Matthew Litchfield ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2025-06-23 - 2:35:12 PM GMT - Time Source: server Agreement completed.
2025-06-23 - 2:35:12 PM GMT
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF
THE WATER USE EFFICIENCY DASHBOARD
This MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (“MOU”) is made and entered into as of June 1, 2025, by and among the City of Glendora (hereinafter referred to as “Glendora”), City of La Verne (hereinafter referred to as “La Verne”), and Three Valleys Municipal Water District (hereinafter referred to as “Three Valleys”). (Glendora, La Verne, and Three Valleys are sometimes hereinafter referred to collectively as the “Parties” and individually as a “Party.”)
RECITALS
A. Three Valleys is a Metropolitan Water District of Southern California member agency responsible for the delivery of supplemental water to its service area (Pomona, Walnut, and East San Gabriel Valleys).
B. Glendora is a retail member agency of Three Valleys and is the purveyor of water within its service area, which generally includes the area within its corporate boundaries.
C. La Verne is a retail member agency of Three Valleys and is the purveyor of water within its service area, which generally includes the area within its corporate boundaries.
D. In July 2024, Three Valleys was awarded $84,391 through Assistance Agreement No.
R24AP00323 with the United States Bureau of Reclamation (“USBR Grant”) under the United States Department of the Interior’s Applied Science Grant Program to support Three Valleys’ Water Use Efficiency Dashboard Project (“Project”). The Project is a regional initiative aimed at enhancing landscape water use efficiency by conducting aerial imagery analysis and land use classification for all commercial, industrial, and institutional parcels within Three Valleys’ service area and developing a regional landscape analysis.
E. Glendora and La Verne are interested in participating in the Project and developing residential land use classification and custom dashboards within their respective service areas to aid in their water resource management activities.
F. The Parties desire to work together to complete their respective Project needs.
G. Three Valleys will serve as the lead agency in the development of the Project.
H. The Parties have worked together to select the vendors for their respective scopes of work for the Project. The scopes of work and the fee proposals are included as
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF
THE WATER USE EFFICIENCY DASHBOARD
Exhibits A-1 and A-2 attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (collectively, “Scope of Work”). Three Valleys will enter into Professional Services Agreement(s) with the selected consultants to perform the Scope of Work on behalf of the Parties.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the faithful performance of the terms and conditions set forth herein, the Parties hereto agree as follows:
1.1 Three Valleys will serve as the contract administrator for the Project and be the point of contact for the selected consultant(s) to perform the Scope of Work.
1.2 Glendora and La Verne will work through Three Valleys with the selected consultant(s) and provide the necessary information to complete the Project.
1.3 Glendora and La Verne will review draft documents and provide feedback as needed and meet all deadlines as set forth by Three Valleys to complete the Project.
1.4 Glendora and La Verne shall perform its obligations under this MOU in a manner fully consistent with the terms and conditions of the USBR Grant, the applicable conditions of which are expressly accepted by Glendora and La Verne as a material part of the Project and incorporated herein as a material part of this MOU.
Glendora and La Verne shall also furnish Three Valleys with all information, data, and materials necessary for Three Valleys to comply with its reporting and other requirements of the USBR Grant. Glendora and La Verne shall maintain books, records, and other documents pertinent to the Scope of Work and their Project work in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and practices.
1.5 The Parties agree to share the costs as described in Exhibit B attached hereto. No Party hereto shall be responsible for any costs of the Project other than as set forth in Exhibit B.
1.6 Three Valleys will pay costs up front and then seek reimbursement from the other Parties on a regular basis (i.e., monthly or quarterly), subject to the maximum amount set forth on Exhibit B with respect to each Party.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF
THE WATER USE EFFICIENCY DASHBOARD
1.7 If a Party fails to comply with its obligations (“Defaulting Party”), the other Party to whom such obligations are owed (“Non-Defaulting Party”) may terminate this Agreement if the Defaulting Party fails to cure such default within thirty (30) days after receipt of notice of default from the Non-Defaulting Party; provided however, such period may be extended if circumstances warrant (as applicable, the “Cure Period”). If the Defaulting Party fails to cure during the Cure Period, the Non-Defaulting Party may terminate this Agreement by providing written notice to the Defaulting Party (“Termination Notice”). Notwithstanding the above, Three Valleys may issue a Termination Notice to the other Parties in the event the USBR Grant is suspended, voided, canceled, and/or otherwise terminated.
1.8 The person(s) executing this MOU on behalf of each Party warrant that they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this MOU on behalf of such Party. This MOU may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed an original, and all of which, together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. The signature of any Party to this MOU transmitted to any other Party by facsimile or e-mail shall be deemed an original signature of the transmitting party. This Agreement may only be amended or modified in writing executed by all Parties hereto.
1.9 All notices, under this MOU shall be delivered in person, by messenger, by overnight mail courier, or by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to each Party at its address shown below. Any notice so delivered by personal delivery or messenger service shall be deemed delivered upon actual delivery. Any notice given by overnight courier with courier charges prepaid shall be deemed delivered twenty-four (24) hours after delivery to said overnight courier. Any notice so delivered by US mail shall be deemed delivered three (3) days after deposit in the US Mail).
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF
THE WATER USE EFFICIENCY DASHBOARD
Three Valleys: Three Valleys Municipal Water District
1021 E. Miramar Avenue
Claremont, CA 91711
Attention: _________________
Email: ______________
Glendora: City of Glendora
116 E. Foothill Blvd.
Glendora, CA 91741
Attention: William Wittkpof
[email protected]
La Verne: _____________________
________________
_________________
Attention: ___________________
Email:
1.10 The prevailing Party in any legal dispute caused by the non-prevailing Party, which said legal dispute arose out of, under, in connection with, or in relation to this MOU, and any amendments thereto, or the breach thereof, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to receive from the non-prevailing Party all attorneys fees and costs actually incurred by the prevailing Party in connection therewith. In any such action, arbitration, mediation, or other proceeding, the entitlement to recover attorneys fees and costs will be considered an element of costs and not of damages.
1.11 This MOU and the covenants and conditions hereof apply to and are binding upon the heirs, successors, legal representatives, and assigns of the Parties hereto.
No Party shall assign this MOU, or any part thereof, or any right or privilege connected therewith, to any other person or entity, without first obtaining the written consent of the other Parties.
1.12 This MOU constitutes the entire understanding of the Parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes any and all prior agreements, whether oral or written, between the Parties in connection therewith. This
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF
THE WATER USE EFFICIENCY DASHBOARD
Agreement may not be amended unless in writing and signed by both Parties hereto.
1.13 This MOU shall not be construed against the Party preparing it, but shall be construed as if all Parties jointly prepared this MOU and any uncertainty or ambiguity contained herein shall not be interpreted against the Party responsible for the drafting thereof. This MOU shall be enforced and governed by and under the laws of the State of California, and venue for any action brought to interpret and/or enforce any provision of this Agreement shall be in a state or federal court located in the County of Los Angeles, State of California, unless otherwise required by the USBR Grant,
1.14 Time is of the essence in this MOU and each and every provision thereof.
1.15 This MOU may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original irrespective of the date of execution, and said counterparts shall together constitute one and the same agreement. Further, facsimile or .PDF copies of signatures shall be as effective as original signatures for evidencing execution of this MOU.
[SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE(S)]
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF
THE WATER USE EFFICIENCY DASHBOARD
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this MOU to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as set forth below:
Three Valleys Municipal Water District
Matthew Litchfield, P.E.
General Manager/Chief Engineer
City of Glendora
Adam Raymond
City Manager
City of La Verne
Ryan Ciotti
Utilities Manager
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF
THE WATER USE EFFICIENCY DASHBOARD
EXHIBIT A-1
SCOPE OF WORK – EAGLE AERIAL SOLUTIONS
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF
THE WATER USE EFFICIENCY DASHBOARD
EXHIBIT A-2
SCOPE OF WORK – CALIFORNIA DATA COLLABORATIVE
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF
THE WATER USE EFFICIENCY DASHBOARD
EXHIBIT B
COST SHARE TABLE
AGENCY COST
USBR Grant $84,391
Three Valleys MWD $66,020
City of Glendora $70,224
City of La Verne $65,265
PROJECT TOTAL $285,900
Jazmine Molloy, Director of Product Development
(714)754-7670 ext 700 3333 Michelson Dr, Suite 300, Irvine, CA 92612 [email protected] Proposal for Three Valleys Municipal Water District
Land Use Classification Dataset (LUCD)
April 25th , 2025
Sylvie Lee
Chief Water Resource Officer
Three Valleys Water District
(909) 293-7035
[email protected]
Eagle Aerial Solutions (EAS) and NV5 are pleased to provide the proposal below per the request of Three Valleys Municipal Water District (TVMWD).
Land Use Classification Dataset (LUCD)
The Land Use Classification Dataset is created through a complex process that utilizes 4-band (Red, Green Blue + Near Infra-Red) orthorectified aerial imagery, advanced machine learning and statistical techniques, as well as human photo-interpretation of imagery. The process and methodology to be utilized in this project mirror exactly the products developed for the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) CII LAM LUCD Program and therefore meets the regulatory requirements under section 968 “Alternative Data”.
For the proposed LUCD mapping project, the EAS/NV5 team will utilize 4band aerial imagery and parcel data to create a Land Use Classification Dataset (LUCD) map for TVMWD.
Source Imagery:
2020 4band (RGB + NIR) orthorectified aerial imagery, summer acquisition, 1ft/30cim resolution with a 95% confidence level.
Jazmine Molloy, Director of Product Development
(714)754-7670 ext 700 3333 Michelson Dr, Suite 300, Irvine, CA 92612 [email protected] Parcel Data:
The 2018 parcel dataset that was utilized in the Cal DWR LAM (Res & CII) projects will be utilized. This parcel data originated from the county assessor, underwent a statewide standardized process and provided by EAS.
Area of Interest
Geographic Extents:
Once TVMWD has approved the geographic extents to be included in the mapping footprint. There will be no adjustment of AOI boundaries or parcel boundaries. If any refinement of the boundary is necessary (i.e. additions of newly developed parcels), additional area can be added to the scope of work on a price per square mile (mi2) basis.
The analysis area for this SOW, per the request of TVMWD includes all the CII areas within the TVMWD service area that fall outside of CADWR's AOI, totaling 166 sq miles. Residential areas (in and outside of the CADWR AOI) for the City of Le Verne and Glendora are also included as optional additions to the SOW.
Jazmine Molloy, Director of Product Development
(714)754-7670 ext 700 3333 Michelson Dr, Suite 300, Irvine, CA 92612 [email protected] Classification Scheme:
The LUCD classification scheme matches the definitions developed for the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) Program. Due to the use of aerial imagery as an input source, the classification system is a “canopy priority”. Each class has a unique irrigation status associated:
• Not irrigable: areas that have no irrigation
• Irrigated: areas that are presumed to be irrigated at the time the imagery was collected • Irrigable not irrigated: areas that show high potential of being irrigated at one time, but are presumed to not be currently irrigated, based on the imagery used to conduct the analysis The Minimum Mapping Unit (MMU) used for capturing features and accuracy assessment from the imagery is 64 square feet. The classification data will be summarized to the client-provided parcel location data.
LUCD Canopy Priority Classification System
Level 1 Level 2 Irrigation Status
1. Impervious Impervious Not Irrigable
2. Pools Swimming pools/man-made water features Irrigated
3. Irrigated
3.1 Turf grass
3.1 Vegetation cover Irrigated (CII Turf grass separated in functional and non-functional turf) 3.2 Canopy
3.3 Bare Earth
4. Irrigable not irrigated
4.1 Turf grass/ground cover
4.1 Vegetation Cover Irrigable not irrigated 4.2 Canopy
4.3 Bare Earth
5. Non irrigated
vegetation Undeveloped for the purposes of irrigation Not Irrigable
6. Undeveloped lands Undeveloped Lands Not Irrigable
7. Horse Corrals Horse Corrals Irrigated
8. Open Water Other open natural water (rivers/ponds) Not Irrigable
9. Artificial Turf Artificial Turf Not Irrigable
10. Agricultural Land
Agricultural Land (1 acre of agriculture within a
single parcel or 1 acre of contiguous agriculture
across 2 or more parcels)
Irrigated
Quality Control and Accuracy Assessment
As a regular practice, the NV5/EAS Team conducts detailed quality control and accuracy assessments to ensure the datasets we provide meet rigid accuracy standards. This is not something most other companies do, and for those that do take these steps, something they often do incorrectly. Often companies use a pixel-based accuracy assessment metric which means that if a large field of 100 pixels is considered correct, then they take that as 100 samples. We instead use an object-based analysis where a single object is evaluated by skilled photo interpreters as to whether it was correctly or incorrectly classified so the 100-pixel field discussed above is considered as 1 sample- not 100. This assessment methodology more correctly identifies the accuracy and therefore reliability of the dataset.
The NV5/EAS team will map the classification dataset to an overall accuracy of 95%. To ensure this accuracy level is met, an assessment will be performed through independent interpretation of check points distributed throughout the service areas. Checkpoint distribution will be stratified by Level 2 LUCD classes (defined in the Jazmine Molloy, Director of Product Development
(714)754-7670 ext 700 3333 Michelson Dr, Suite 300, Irvine, CA 92612 [email protected] classification table) as well as geography. A minimum of 25 checkpoints (objects) per square mile will be randomly distributed across the sites in addition, 25 sites will be allocated to specific land use classes not sufficiently represented by the randomly distributed points. Photo interpreters will independently classify each checkpoint with the outline of the classified product, but with no information of the mapped class. Each classified point will be interpreted and evaluated to an appropriate classification of both land cover and land use within the context of the overall line work associated with the mapped classification. A confusion matrix will be developed to assess user and producer accuracies for each class as well as the overall accuracy across classes. Classes that occupy < 1% of the land area may not meet this accuracy level.
Our goal is a first-time right delivery. This reduces unintended costs on both the sides of the client and the contractor and avoids unintended delays and iterations of the datasets. An example of the level of detail provided in the LUCD classification mapping is demonstrated in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Example of the Land Use Cover Data (LUCD) set classification over an institutional parcel.
Jazmine Molloy, Director of Product Development
(714)754-7670 ext 700 3333 Michelson Dr, Suite 300, Irvine, CA 92612 [email protected] Deliverables Timeline and Pricing:
1. Land Use Classification Dataset (LUCD)
a. Feature class and/or shapefile dataset with LUCD classification in attribution b. Metadata
2. Parcel Summaries
a. Feature class and/or shapefile dataset including parcel level summaries of LUCD classifications b. Metadata
3. Functional/Non Functional_Turf (this product only applies to CII areas) a. Feature class and/or shapefile dataset with FT/NFT designation in attribution b. Metadata
4. Residential_Extensions_Summaries
a. Feature class and/or shapefile dataset including summaries of LUCD classifications within extension areas
b. Metadata
5. Final Report - This report will outline the process steps taken to accomplish this work as well as provide summary statistics of the results.
6. Metadata - All deliveries will contain FGDC compliant metadata created in a format most suitable to TVMWD.
Pricing:
Individual Options:
1. CII datasets in areas that fall outside of CADWR's AOI = $128,800
2. Residential LUCD datasets in areas outside of CADWR AOI a. City of La Verne = $27,686
b. City of Glendora = $27,543
3. Residential LUCD datasets inside CADWR AOI
a. City of La Verne = $50,945
b. City of Glendora = $53,073
Discount for Bundled work:
• Option A: Options 1+2 together:
o 5% discount for Residential LUCD datasets for La Verne and Glendora (2a & 2b) § $52,467.55
o Total Discounted Price: $181,267
• Option B: Options 1+2+3 together:
o 20% discount on option #1: CII datasets in areas that fall outside of CADWR's AOI § $103,040
o 15% discount on option #2: Residential LUCD datasets for La Verne and Glendora (2a & 2b) § $46,944.65
o 15% discount on option #3: Residential LUCD datasets for La Verne and Glendora (3a & 3b) § $88,415.35
o Total Discounted Price: $238,400
Jazmine Molloy, Director of Product Development
(714)754-7670 ext 700 3333 Michelson Dr, Suite 300, Irvine, CA 92612 [email protected] Delivery and Invoicing Timeline based on Discount Bundle Option B :
Delivery of datasets approximately 6 months from the project Kick-Off meeting.
The EAS/NV5 team requests that Three Valleys Municipal Water District review data deliverables within 2 weeks after delivery or sooner. This will ensure that the data is understood, that any feedback can be incorporated in the data being reviewed, and that feedback can also be applied to future deliveries before they are passed to Three Valleys Municipal Water District.
Month Deliverable Invoice amount
1 Project Kick Off $0
3 LUCD CII and FT/NFT products in half of the areas that fall outside of CADWR CII project
[Excluding the City of Glendora and the City of La Verne] $51,520
4 LUCD CII and FT/NFT products in half of the areas that fall outside of CADWR CII project
[Excluding the City of Glendora and the City of La Verne] $51,520
5/6 City of Glendora Data $68,523.60
6 City of Le Verne Data $66,836.40
6 Final reviews and feedback
Final delivery package including all reports and metadata $0
Total $238,400
* Delay in TVMWD feedback review and approvals may cause delays in the final delivery timeline.
To: Sylvie Lee, Three Valleys Municipal Water District
From: Christopher Tull, California Data Collaborative
Subject: Scope of Work for Dashboard and Regional Landscape Analysis Date: 9 April 2025
Scope of Work for Dashboard & Regional Landscape
Analysis
The California Data Collaborative (CaDC) proposes to support Three Valleys Municipal Water District (TVMWD) to transform landscape-level data into actionable water efficiency strategies.
Through geospatial analysis, strategic planning support, and our Wavelet software platform, we will help TVMWD maximize the impact of their Bureau of Reclamation grant while positioning member agencies for long-term success. Our approach combines regional-scale analysis to identify high-impact opportunities with software to support retail agencies with implementation, enabling a coordinated and data-driven approach to water efficiency. By analyzing landscape classifications across all 13 member agencies and providing specialized software to participating retail agencies, we will deliver actionable insights for non-functional turf (NFT) conversion, regulatory compliance, and program optimization. This integrated approach ensures that TVMWD not only understands its landscape patterns but can also effectively transform that understanding into measurable water savings and successful efficiency programs.
Project Understanding
CaDC understands that TVMWD may have several different needs with respect to this project.
We believe that each of these needs is best addressed in a focused manner with different types of deliverables rather than attempting to achieve all these goals with one deliverable.
Identified goals include:
1. Understanding trends in the distribution of irrigated area, specifically turf grass and NFT and their implications for the design and implementation of water efficiency programs.
This is best done through a customized analysis resulting in a report whose findings can be used to inform program design, grant applications, and board communications.
2. Knowing the precise location of landscapes currently irrigating NFT to support customer outreach and encourage the replacement of this NFT. This is best accomplished through an interactive map that displays both high-resolution imagery and detailed landscape classification data to allow identification of landscapes and customers for outreach.
3. Providing retail member agencies with tools to enable their own understanding of customer water efficiency as well as compliance with the state’s water use efficiency regulation. This goal is well supported by CaDC’s current Wavelet software which was specially designed for this input by CaDC and our members.
Scope of Work for Dashboard and Regional Landscape Analysis Furthermore, it is our understanding that TVMWD will be procuring landscape classifications from a separate vendor as this is outside of CaDC’s core capabilities.
It is possible for goals 2 and 3 specified above to be accomplished with one piece of software.
However, there are two difficulties with this approach:
1. Wavelet does not currently support integration with object-level landscape classifications.
2. Wavelet is designed specifically for users within retail water agencies, not wholesale water agencies desiring a regional view.
Both of these are possible to address, and the end result would be a higher-quality experience for retail agency staff who could then join their customer water demand data to landscape area data and leverage Wavelet’s ability to tag, sort, and prioritize customers as part of their work planning and administering efficiency programs.
For TVMWD staff, development of a regional dashboard would need to proceed from scratch and may end up with a product similar to other available mapping dashboards such as that offered by PlanetScape.
Developing this additional functionality would bring a substantial additional cost. TVMWD should evaluate the relative priority of their different goals to determine the best path forward.
The scope of work below lays out CaDC’s proposal to address goals 1 and 3, and leaves procurement of an online mapping application which allows detailed viewing of landscape classification data to TVMWD.
Scope of Work
CaDC's proposed scope encompasses two complementary components: (1) a comprehensive regional landscape analysis to drive strategic planning, and (2) implementation support for interested member agencies through our Wavelet platform. These components work together to transform landscape data into actionable water efficiency programs.
Task 1: Regional Landscape Analysis
A regional analysis of landscape classification data can highlight which areas have the most opportunity for water savings through NFT removal. In this project, CaDC will:
• Analyze landscape classification data for all 13 member agencies to identify trends and • Assess potential impacts of Water Use Efficiency (WUE) regulations, including modeling potential water savings scenarios for NFT removal
• Develop strategic recommendations for water efficiency programs • Create visualizations of regional landscape patterns and high-priority opportunities Scope of Work for Dashboard and Regional Landscape Analysis Task 2: Wavelet Water Efficiency Software for Member Agencies Our Wavelet platform bridges the gap between high-level analysis and on-the-ground action. By translating regional insights into parcel-level targeting and project identification, Wavelet enables member agencies to efficiently implement water conservation programs and track their progress toward efficiency goals. Under this project, CaDC will:
• Deploy the CaDC Wavelet Platform
o Custom configuration for each participating agency using their customer data o Integration of DWR residential LAM data
o Agency-specific efficiency metrics and targets
o Compliance tracking tools
o NOTE: this task does NOT include integrating custom object-level landscape classifications into the Wavelet platform
• Provide Technical Support & Training
o Platform onboarding sessions
o Ongoing technical assistance
o Regular check-ins and progress reviews
Data Requirements
For Regional Landscape Analysis
• Landscape classification shapefiles (object/super-pixel level) o Land cover classifications
o Irrigation status
o Functional/non-functional designation
• Service area boundaries
• Current water use data (if available)
Format: ESRI Shapefile or GeoJSON
Resolution: Object-level or super-pixel polygons
Attributes: Classification ID, Area, Irrigation Status
For Wavelet Software
• Billed water consumption and customer data for retail agencies (See CaDC’s Data Onboarding documentation for details)
• Residential LAM data package provided to urban water suppliers by the Department of Water Resources
Scope of Work for Dashboard and Regional Landscape Analysis Deliverables
1. Regional Landscape Analysis Report
o Comprehensive landscape analysis report
o Water savings potential analysis
o Efficiency recommendations and prioritization
2. One year of CaDC Membership at Analytics Tier for 6 of TVMWDs retail agencies including deployment of the Wavelet software.
Timeline and Cost
Budget
Item Cost
Regional Landscape Data Analysis and Report $29,000
FY 25-26 Analytics-level Membership in CaDC including Wavelet software access for Glendora and La Verne
(Agencies priced according to CaDC’s FY 24-25 dues structure) $18,500
Total Cost $47,500
The total budget is estimated at $84,000, but this number depends on the number of agencies that ultimately choose to participate by joining the CaDC and accessing the Wavelet software.
The respective cost for TVMWD’s six larger public agency retailers is shown in the table below.
Private water companies are also eligible, but may face additional complications with pricing and data access if they serve multiple distinct service areas.
Retailer # of Metered Connections
CaDC Analytics
Membership TOTAL
City of Glendora 13,468 $7,500
City of La Verne 20,193 $11,000
TOTAL for Membership 112,511 $18,500
Scope of Work for Dashboard and Regional Landscape Analysis Figure 1. CaDC FY 24-25 membership dues.
Timeline
• Onboard retail agencies to CaDC and Wavelet – 4 months Upon start of work, CaDC can immediately begin onboarding participating member agencies to Wavelet and get them involved in the CaDC community. It should take approximately 4 months to onboard six agencies, but this timeline is strongly dependent on the time required for agencies to sign nondisclosure agreements and transfer data. • Classification Data Prepared by Third Party (not CaDC) - TBD While CaDC is not responsible for developing the landscape classification dataset, this task is a critical piece of our timeline because work cannot begin until the landscape classification data is ready.
• Analyze Regional Landscape Data – 6 months
Once the landscape data is available, CaDC will commence with the regional landscape data analysis. Even before delivery of the landscape data, CaDC can begin to engage with TVMWD stakeholders to understand policies and calculations of interest in order to hit the ground running once data is available.
• Prepare Final Report – 2 months
CaDC will meet regularly with TVMWD staff during the course of data analysis, preparing iterative findings as we go. Once most analysis work in complete we will document the results in a final report.
Scope of Work for Dashboard and Regional Landscape Analysis Terms of Payment
CaDC issue one invoice for $18,500 upon receipt of notice to proceed from TVMWD. This is to cover CaDC membership for Glendora and La Verne.
CaDC will issue a second invoice for $10,000 upon receipt of the data required to complete the Regional Landscape Data Analysis and Report, coinciding with start of work on the analysis.
CaDC will issue a final payment for $19,000 upon submission of the final report and its acceptance by TVMWD.
WATER USE EFFICIENCY DASHBOARD MOU AND
URBAN WATER USE OBJECTIVE UPDATE
PUBLIC WORKS, WATER DIVISION
CITY COUNCIL
AUGUST 26, 2025
RUSSELL ACKERMAN, SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST
URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIPS
THREE VALLEYS MWD PARTNERSHIP
• Regional Urban Water Management Plan MOU
• City of Glendora
• City of La Verne
• Golden State Water Company (Claremont, San Dimas)
• Rowland Water District
• Walnut Valley Water District
URBAN WATER USE OBJECTIVE UPDATE
FY YEAR -
PERCENTAGE
+16.59%
ACRE FEET
DWR COMPARISON FIGURES- FY 23/24 V. FY 24/25
0 200
400
600
800
1000
1200
FY23/24 FY24/25
CONSERVATION LEGISLATION
URBAN WATER USE OBJECTIVE
Slide provided courtesy of CalWEP
UWUO City of Glendora Water FY 23/24 = -20.3%
Actual Water Use for City of Glendora Water FY 23/24 = +16.59
SAMPLE DARK PRESENTATION TITLE
SAMPLE SUBHEAD
Slide provided courtesy of CalWEP
WATER USE EFFICIENCY DASHBOARD
CONSERVATION LEGISLATION
URBAN WATER USE OBJECTIVE
Slide provided courtesy of CalWEP
CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIPS
THREE VALLEYS MWD PARTNERSHIP
• Water Use Efficiency Dashboard MOU
• Eagle Aerial/NV5 aerial imagery – CII and residential • California Data Collaborative – WUE Dashboard
QUESTIONS?
RECOMMENDATION
THAT THE CITY COUNCIL:
1. Receive and file the Urban Water Use Objective Update; and
2. Authorize and approve to enter into an inter-agency service and co-funding memorandum of understanding agreement with Three Valleys Municipal Water District (TVMWD) for the Water Use Efficiency (WUE) Dashboard Project in an amount not to exceed $70,224.
STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and Council Members DATE: August 26, 2025
FROM: Finance DISTRICT(S): Citywide
SUBJECT: Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2024
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:
1. Receive and file the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2024.
STRATEGIC FOCUS AREAS
Goal 2: Maintain Financial Stability and Sustainability (MFSS)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) is an extensive report summarizing the financial activities of the City for the fiscal year from July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024. Badawi & Associates has completed an independent audit and issued an unmodified (“clean”) opinion on the financial statements. This is the best opinion the City can receive from its auditors.
Specifically, an unmodified opinion means as a result of their examination, testing and audit procedures, Badawi & Associates concluded the financial statements fairly present the financial position of the City.
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY / PREVIOUS ACTIONS
Glendora Municipal Code 2.20.030, stipulates that Finance shall prepare and present to the City Council an annual statement or report in sufficient detail to show the financial condition of the City.
DISCUSSION
The ACFR is prepared in compliance with the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) standards. Pursuant to GASB guidelines, the City’s ACFR is divided into three sections: Introductory, Financial and Statistical.
The Introductory Section provides a brief overview of the City, economic outlook, operational controls and major initiatives. It also includes the GFOA Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting for fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
The City has consistently received this certificate. The ACFR for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, will be submitted to GFOA this month, March 2025 with approved extensions due to extenuating circumstances, such as implementing a new financial system and staff vacancies. However, there is an expectation of receiving the award again.
The Financial Section which will be the primary point of discussion in this report, includes the independent auditors’ opinion letter, Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A), and the Basic Financial Statements. The Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) provides a narrative of how the financial report is presented and key highlights of some of the changes in our financial position. The MD&A provides tables showing comparative information from fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.
The Financial Section includes multiple financial statement formats, starting with the Government-Wide Financial Statements, Fund Financial Statements and Combining & Individual Fund Statements. The Government-Wide Financial Statements are intended to communicate the financial condition of the City in a manner similar to private sector reporting. The Fund Financial Statements and the Combining & Individual Fund Statements relate more closely to the budget document and the day-to-day management of the City’s resources. Below are highlights from the financial reports.
Government-Wide Financial Statement Highlights
In 2023, the Net Position was $214 million and at the end of FY 2024 the Net Position is $222 million. This is an increase in Net Position of $9 million. The City’s total net position increased from the prior fiscal year’s net position primarily due the increase in capital improvement program activity increasing capitalized assets in the amount of $21.1 million. The net investment in capital assets in governmental activities increased by $9.8 million, primarily due to several street and park projects were completed over the course of fiscal year 2023-2024, including the Washington Elementary Crosswalk improvements, and Louie Pompei Park Shade Structure Installation and Playground Resurfacing. The net investment in capital assets in Business-Type Activities increased by $13.6 million from the completion of several infrastructure projects including Bender Carter Santa Fe Newburgh Water Main Replacement and Louie Pompei Park Turf Replacement, and other various infrastructure and water main improvements throughout the City.
Governmental Fund Highlights
Governmental Funds include the General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, Capital Project Funds, and Debt Service Funds.
The Net Change in Fund Balances for the General Fund for the fiscal year was an increase of $3,184,343 after applying the reserve policy transfers, which maintained a contingency reserve balance of $16.8 million.
General fund revenues came in better than budgeted in all revenue sources except Taxes. Sales Tax and Measure E saw a decrease of approximately $0.5 million from FY2023 to FY2024. As the City heads through 2024 and 2025, Sales tax and Measure E will see some stabilization, caused by the ongoing battle against inflation and continued consumer spending. The voters approved Measure Z an additional 0.25% transaction and use in November of 2024. The City Council approved using funding for programs and items to address Public Safety, Library program intergovernmental funding changes, affordable housing, citywide communication efforts and City events provided through Recreation and Human Services. Property tax revenues increased slightly relating to the steady rising home values within the City. Use of Money and Property exceeded budgets by $4.1 million due to recognition of unrealized gains/losses required by Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement 31. License and Permits exceeded budget by $0.2 million due to an increase in building and plan checks issued.
Charges for Services exceeded budgets by $0.2 million due to increased revenue in contract classes and activities. Other revenues were generally in-line with the budgeted amounts.
The transfers out from the General Fund were done in accordance with the reserve policy that was adopted in June 2020.
The committed fund balance: emergency contingency reserve was established at a maximum of 45% of prior year operating General Fund expenditures and the amounts in excess of 45% at year-end were transferred per the policy to the Capital Projects Fund ($2.4 million), Pension Stabilization Fund ($1.4 million), any deficit internal service fund and towards the City’s Other Post-Employment Benefit Section 115 Trust (OPEB Trust). In this case, $0.5 million was transferred to the General Liability Fund and to the OPEB Trust. The Pension Stabilization Fund is combined with the General Fund for financial statement presentation purposes. At the June 30, 2024, the General Fund Committed Contingencies Reserve is $15.6 million. This reserve is critical for emergencies and is relied upon for cash flow needs during the year, in particular during the first six months of the fiscal year before property tax revenues are received.
Business Type Activities/Proprietary Funds Highlights
Proprietary Funds include the Water funds, and the Internal Service Funds. The major fund is the Water Funds, both operations and capital.
The change in net position represents revenues that exceed expenditures. Per the rate study, these funds are designated for capital projects in the new budget year and to maintain reserves per the Water reserve policy. The net investment in capital assets is the value of the assets net of the outstanding debt. Net investment in capital assets increased by $5.6 million during this fiscal year primarily due to the City starting the Louie Pompei Turf replacement project as well as multiple water main replacement projects. These funds are not spendable. Of the Internal Service Funds, the Worker’s Compensation ended the year with a deficit net position. For the Worker’s Compensation Fund the deficit is comprised of the actuarially estimated liability of open claims and judgments both reported and those incurred but not reported (IBNR). By its nature the IBNR calculation fluctuates from year to year. It is important to note the current cash balance of $2.4 million is sufficient for the annual operating cash flow needs, which is in addition to the monthly charges for services to the respective departments. Per the General Fund reserve policy, this year, the General Liability Fund received a transfer of $0.5 million. Although the General Liability Fund did not end the year with a deficit net position, the transfer was to mitigate ending the year in a deficit and to cover the FY25 operating budget.
Fiduciary Funds Highlights
Fiduciary Funds include Successor Agency Funds. The Successor Agency Funds are used primarily for debt service.
The Statistical Section is the last section of the ACFR. The Statistical Section includes data useful in analyzing the City’s financial and operational history for comparative purposes. Some of the financial statistics tracked include financial trends, revenue capacity, and debt capacity, which are useful for evaluating the City’s financial stability. There are also demographic/economic information and operating indicators which allow the reader to understand the environment and how the financial report relates to the services provided by the City.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommendations in this report.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Prepared By: Shirley Feng, Senior Accountant
Concurs With: Not Applicable
Reviewed By: Kyle Johnson, Finance Director/City Treasurer Certified to Availability of
Funds:
Kyle Johnson, Finance Director/City Treasurer
Approved By: Adam Raymond, City Manager
Legal Review: Danny Aleshire, City Attorney
CEQA Review:
Not Applicable
Attachments
A. Annual Comprehensive Financial Report - Delivery Under Separate Cover.pdf Regular City Council Meeting of Tuesday, August 26, 2025 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2024 (Attachments to be provided under separate cover)