Goleta City Council
January 18, 2022

Agenda Item C.2

CPMS PUBLIC HEARING
Meeting Date: January 18, 2022
____________________________________________________________

TO: Mayor and Councilmembers

FROM: Jaime A. Valdez, Neighborhood Services Director

CONTACT: Jaime A. Valdez, Neighborhood Services Director Claudia Dato, Senior Project Manager

SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Consider Goleta Train Depot Project Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR)

RECOMMENDATION:

A. Open a public hearing to take verbal and written testimony; and B. After considering the evidence presented during the public hearing, adopt Resolution No. 22-__ entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Goleta, California Certifying the Goleta Train Depot Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2020050499) and Approving the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Goleta Train Depot Project Located at 27 South La Patera Lane and Approving the Project (City Capital Improvement Project 9079).”

BACKGROUND:

On April 26, 2018, the California State Transportation Agency (CalSTA) notified the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG) that SBCAG had been awarded $13 million in funding as a result of submitt ing an application prepared by the City of Goleta under the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP).

On May 31, 2018, the City closed escrow on the purchase of the former Direct Relief site, an approximately 2.5 -acre property located at 27 South La Patera Lane (Assessor’s Parcel Number 073-050-033) for $6.7M as part of the future Goleta Train Depot ( GTD) Project. The site is currently developed with a 39,800 square -foot vacant warehouse structure, with an associated parking lot, outdoor storage area, and vehicle yard. The project site’s land use designation is listed as Business Park (I-BP) according to the City’s General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan (General Plan). The zoning designation of the project site is depicted as an Office District with a Business Park (BP) designation under the City’s Title 17 Zoning Ordinance.

The awarded TIRCP grant is to fund the development of a new, multi-modal train station at the location of the existing AMTRAK platform with the intent to increase rail ridership 1 Meeting Date: January 18, 2022

and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Through the completion of a full -service station, the project will improve connections to bus transit, accommodate transit service to/from the Santa Barbara Airport and the University of California Santa Barbara (UCSB), add new bicycle and pedestrian facilities, add a food service component and new restrooms, and allow accommodation for potential future additional train storage that will support increased commuter rail needs. The potential future additional train s torage is a separate project led by the Los Angeles – San Diego – San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Agency (LOSSAN). These improvements will create a new, safer, more functional and inviting rail station in Goleta. The GTD Project site is adjacent to the exist ing AMTRAK platform at the northern end of South La Patera Lane (SLP).

The proposed GTD structure w ill be approximately 9,000 square feet in size and w ill provide a permanent, enclosed, and safe structure for Amtrak passengers to use as they wait to board or after they disembark from trains. The GTD building will be located in the northern portion of the project site, adjacent to the railroad right -of-way, with the parking lot and driveways located in the southern portion of the project site (see site plan in Figure 1). The architecture of the structure would be a traditional depot design with modern elements. The structure would have large windows and columns to support a roof overhang to create protected outdoor areas around the building. An additional turnaround area would be located at the entry of the site and would be designed to allow buses and shuttles to provide easy drop -off and pick-up for passengers. Although the FEIR state s that between 116 and 126 parking spaces would be provided for passe ngers to leave their vehicles for various lengths of time , the current design now provides 111 spaces .

This figure will be corrected in the FEIR after certification. This edit is considered insignificant because no specific parking requirement is set forth in the City Zoning Ordinance for the proposed use , and no impact analysis is affected . For sake of comparison, an office building of this size would only require 30 parking spaces at one space for every 300 square feet of floor area.

Electric vehicle charging stations are proposed for the site, and approximately half of the roof would contain solar panels to capture solar energy. The proposed Depot would be designed and constructed consistent with City Resolution No. 12 -65 which requires City owned buildings of 2,000 square feet or greater of conditioned space to achieve United States Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Silver certification.

The first phase of construction would involve demolition and removal of all debris and waste materials associated with the existing 39,800 square foot warehouse structure.

Attachment 1 provides a detailed presentation on the update to the Depot design with requested deviations from certain development standards for the Goleta Train Depot.

Attachment 2 provides a presentation on the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Goleta Train Depot. Attachment 3 provides a r esolution of the City Council certifying the Goleta Train Depot Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2020050499) and approving the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Goleta Train Depot Project Located at 27 South La Patera Lane and approving the Project (City Capital Improvement Project 9079) . Additional project details can be found in Section 2 of the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) provided as Exhibit 1 of Attachment 3 and development plans for the project are included as Exhibit 3 of Attachment 3. 2 Meeting Date: January 18, 2022

Figure 1: Goleta Train Depot Overall Site Plan

GTD Project Timeline

On December 18, 2018, the City Council authorized the Mayor to execute the TIRCP Grant Funding Agreement between SBCAG and the City.

On June 4, 2019, the City Council authorized a Professional Design Services Agreement with Anil Verma Associate s (AVA) for the GTD Project in an amount not to exceed $2,400,000 with the term of agreement expiring on June 30, 2022. In addition to AVA, the multi-firm design team includes RailPros, Rincon Environmental, MNS Engineering, ENGEO, and SE Solutions. They have been providing services for design, rail authority coordination, and environmental planning. The project design team is providing plans, specifications, estimates, and environmental approvals to develop two packages: The Goleta Train Depot facility and site; and South La Patera Lane Improvements.

The initial key work product required by the TIRCP Grant was the completion of a Station Area Master Plan (SAMP) for the GTD Project which informed the GTD’s design in terms of site layout, building features/amenities, and circulation/access to and from the site. The City Council unanimously adopted the SAMP on February 4, 2020.

On March 3, 2020, City staff presented an update of the GTD Project along with three building designs and roadway improvements to SLP. It included background on the site’s location and context (land use, road network, etc.) , p otential community themes for inspiration, as well as p otential depot building designs in context of visual perspectives (“Schooner,” “Traditional,” and “Sunrise” concepts). The update to Council also provided existing and proposed site layouts , l andscaping, stormwater, and hardscaping design 3 Meeting Date: January 18, 2022

concepts, as well as sustainability design concepts for the building and the site. It briefly touched on the e xisting SLP configuration and options for roadway improvements of sidewalks, bike accommodations, parking and landscaping.

On June 3, 2020, Staff hosted a virtual community workshop for the GTD Project. The three depot design concepts were presented along with options for the proposed roadway improvements along SLP. The workshop was recorded and continues to be available online. Over 30 members of the public participated in the live workshop and over 165 views of the recorded workshop have occurred on YouTube. Staff also created a survey open for the public to provide feedback on expectations and preferences for the GTD.

The survey went live on May 26, 2020, and closed on June 19, 2020, with 1,119 complete responses.

Building on the community input received from the community outreach efforts described above, on August 5, 2020, City staff provided an update on the three building design concepts for Council’s consideration and the Council concurred with Staff’s recommendation to proceed with the “Traditional” theme with modern elements for the train depot building. The City Council asked staff to return in October of 2020 for an update and discus sion on potential public roadway improvements along with additional information on refined building design and site plan.

On August 18, 2020 , and September 23, 2020, members of the Project Team met with representatives of the Santa Barbara Bicycle Coalit ion (SB BIKE) and the Coalition for Sustainable Transportation (COAST) to receive input on bicycle access, circulation, storage and amenities at and to/from the GTD Project. A number of their suggestions were incorporated including amount, placement, and p references of bicycle storage as well as input related to bicycle circulation and access. Both SB BIKE and COAST support Staff’s recommended “ Infill” public roadway improvements from Hollister Avenue to the terminus of SLP.

The GTP Project went to the Design Review Board (DRB) on January 26th, April 27th and July 13th, 2021, for Advisory Review. Although the GTD Project which does not require formal review or approval by the DRB, as an important gateway project for the community, City staff was interested in soliciting DRB’s input . Although advisory, the Project Team addressed DRB’s input from these meetings and revised the project renderings accordingly.

DISCUSSION:

Environmental Review

After completion of an Initial Study with CEQA checklist in May 2020, City staff determined that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was needed to further analyze the environmental effects of the proposed GTD Project. As discussed in Section 1.4 of the Final EIR (FEIR), several impact areas were “scoped out” of the EIR analysis because there was no substantial evidence that significant impacts would occur in any of th ose specific issue areas . These issue areas included, but are not limited to, Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, Biological Resources, Noise, Geology, Land Use and Planning, 4 Meeting Date: January 18, 2022

Recreation and Public Services. Please refer to Table 1 -2 on FEIR, Section 1.4, for a complete analysis of issues not studied in detail within the EIR.

For issues not scoped out of further analysis, the EIR analyzes the characteristics of the proposed project, the potential environmental impacts for various issue areas , possible alternatives to the proposed project, and mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts associated with the proposed project. A Notice of Preparation for a Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was issued in May 2020, with comments due in late June 2020.

Rincon Consultants was the lead firm on the environmental review and completed the Draft EIR in early June 2021. The City’s Environmental Hearing Officer held a public meeting on June 30, 2021, to take public comments on the DEIR, and a 45 -day public comment period for review of the DEIR was conducted from June 3 rd to July 19th, 2021.

There were no comments provided by the public during the June 30, 2021, public hearing.

The City of Goleta only received one comment letter on the Draft EIR during the public review period asking for minor revisions related to law enforcement and fire services. The FEIR responded by making these minor edits.

The Draft EIR identified potentially significant impacts in the following issue categories:
biological resources, cultural and tribal cultural resources, and geology and soils. All impacts were determined to be less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. Please refer to Table ES -1 in the Executive Summary of the FEIR for a complete listing of environmental impacts, mitigation measures and residual impacts (Exhibit 1 of Attachment 3). Mitigation measures are required in the areas of biology (roosting bats and nesting birds/raptors), cultural resources (unanticipated discovery), geology (unanticipated discovery of paleontological resources), hazardous materials (related to existing and historical industrial use of the project site), and tribal cultural resources (archaeological and Native American monitoring for ground disturbing activities and unanticipated discovery of tribal cultural resources).

As required by CEQA, th e F EIR also examines alternatives to the proposed project.

Those studied include the following two alternatives.

 Alternative 1: No Project/Existing Warehouse
 Alternative 2: Reduced Depot Footprint and On-Site Amenities

The No Project Alternative would not fulfill any Project Objectives because the existing warehouse would not provide a train depot to improve train ridership or City identity, improve transit connectivity, or reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Under Alternative 2, the depot would be reduced in size to approximately 2,000 square feet and would not include a café or kitchen area, meeting room, or formal lobby. Based on the alternatives analysis of the FEIR , Alternative 2 was determined to be the environmentally superior alternative. While the impacts associated with Alternative 2 would be lower than the Project, they would not be significantly lower because substantial demolition and construction still need to occur. Under the area of Utilities only Alternative 2 impacts would be less than the Project due to reduced water demand from the smaller facility. However, as discussed in the FEIR, the impacts of Alternative 2 would not be significantly less in comparison to the Project. In addition, Alternative 2 does not include 5 Meeting Date: January 18, 2022

a café, meeting room, and formal waiting room and, therefore, would not meet the critical Project objective of developing a full -service train depot that would provide gathering spaces and convenience for patrons which are intended to increase ridership of the rail system and constitute a space for community education. The absence of these amenities would also not meet the TIRCP grant objectives which include increasing train ridership and creating a regional hub for alternative transportation through the development of a full-service train station defined as an approximately 8,000 square foot building that:

“…will include a lobby, electronic ticketing are a, waiting room, café, community meeting room, restrooms/shower/changing facilities, bike storage and baggage storage lockers. In addition, the design of the depot will accommodate opportunities for public art projects both inside and outside the building.”

Moreover, the additional input on recommendations for on -site improvements and amenities from the STAMP would not be possible under Alternative 2.

Overall, the FEIR concludes that the project will not result in any significant, unmitigable impacts to the environment. All environmental impacts of the project are less than significant with the incorporation of mitigation measures. The project would result in a significant benefit to the public by creating a regional multi-modal transportation hub. In addition to the benefits of increased multi -modal transportation for the public, especially rail service, other benefits of the project include a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from alternative transportation, greatly increased site landscaping and tree planting s, improved stormwater runoff treatment, and significantly enhanced architectural and site aesthetics. Given these benefits, staff also supports the minor deviations to the setbacks and height restriction requested for the project because they facilitate enhanced parking and circulation, the aesthetics and functionality of the building, and the enjoyment of the site by the public by way of covered bus shelters, and kiosks that provide opportunities to display information and public art.

General Plan and Zoning Consistency

The project is consistent with the General Plan (see Exhibit 4 to the Resolution in Attachment 3) and Title 17 with the exception of a few deviations (see Exhibit 5 to the Resolution in Attachment 3).

The proposed GTD project includes deviations to the required 10 -foot south side yard setback and the 10 -foot westerly rear yard setback to accommodate encroachments of the parking area as shown on plan sheet L100 (Exhibit 3 of Attachment 3). These are needed to provide for greater drive aisles which will more easily allow for circulation of larger vehicles such as buses and fire trucks. On the north, side property line, the existing warehouse building is currently located on the property line. The new depot building will be predominantly located outside the 10-foot setback (at approximately 15 feet); however, the outdoor arcade columns are placed at a 7-foot setback and the roof overhang of this is at a 5.5 -foot setback. While the depot building complies wit h the 50 -foot front yard setback, there are a few minor accessory structures, including the bus shelter and three information kiosks that are located within this area. Also proposed is a small deviation in the 35-foot maximum height standard to allow a small portion of the roof peak (5% of the 6 Meeting Date: January 18, 2022

total roof area) to extend up to 38 feet in height. These deviations are also detailed in Section 5 of the resolution (Attachment 3).

It should be noted that under the City’s new Zoning Ordinance, no land use entitl ements or zoning permits are required for City capital projects. No action by the Planning Commission is required and review by the Design Review Board and Public Tree Advisory Committee is optional. In this case, as discussed in greater detail below, the GTP Project was taken to the Design Review Board (DRB) for Advisory Review. The DEIR incorrectly stated that the project would be required to be reviewed by the Design Review Board, Public Tree Advisory Commission, and the Planning Commission. The City Council is the only required review and decision-making entity for the project.

GOLETA STRATEGIC PLAN:

The GTD Project seeks to address the following five strategies in bold in the City’s Strategic Plan:

 Support Environmental Vitality
 Ensure Financial Stability
 Support Economic Vitality
 Strengthen Infrastructure
 Maintain a Safe Community

FISCAL IMPACTS:

There is no new fiscal impact associated with this item. Expenditures for the GTD Project are specifically tracked and paid out of Account No. 321 -90-9079-57070 on a reimbursement basis from SBCAG.

The existing not-to-exceed $2.4M Professional Design Services Agreement with AVA remains intact and has an expiration date of June 30, 2022 . No additional funding is anticipated to complete the design and environmental aspects of the GTD Project.

Overall, the GTD Project is estimated at $19 million which is composed of $6.7 million in City funding for site acquisition and $12.2 million in TIRCP grant funding for development and construction.

ALTERNATIVES:

Not applicable.

Reviewed By: Legal Review By: Approved By:

___________________ ___________________ _________________ Kristine Schmidt Megan Garibaldi Michelle Greene
Assistant City Manager City Attorney City Manager

7 Meeting Date: January 18, 2022

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Presentation on Design Update with Requested Deviations from Certain Development Standards for the Goleta Train Depot

2. Presentation on the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Goleta Train Depot

3. Resolution of the City Council of the City of Goleta, California Certifying the Goleta Train Depot Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2020050499) and Approving the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Goleta Train Depot Project Located at 27 South La Patera Lane and Approving th e Project (City Capital Improvement Project 9079), including:

Exhibit 1: Goleta Train Depot Final Environmental Impact Report Exhibit 2: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Exhibit 3: Development Plans
Exhibit 4: General Plan Consistency
Exhibit 5: Zoning Consistency Analysis

8 ATTACHMENT 1

Presentation on Design Update with Requested Deviations from Certain Development Standards for the Goleta Train Depot
9 GOLETA TRAIN DEPOT
Design Update
Presentation to City Council, January 18, 2022
Department of Neighborhood Services
10 Proposed Site Plan
11 Plaza and Amenities
Avocado, Olive or
Citrus Tree
12 Current View – from Drive Entry
13 Current View – from Train approach
14 Current Design – South View
15 Current View – Main Entry
16 Interior Views
17 Interior Views
18 GOLETA TRAIN DEPOT
Site Deviation Requests
Presentation to City Council, January 18, 2022
Department of Neighborhood Services
19 Existing Site
20 Proposed Site
REQUESTS FOR DEVIATION:

SOUTH AND WEST SIDEYARDS - 10' SIDEYARD SETBACK (17.09.030). ALLOW UP TO 4'-0" ENCROACHMENT FOR PARKING IN SCREENED AREAS.

SETBACK FROM UPRR R/W - 10' SIDEYARD SETBACK FOR BUILDING (17.09.030). PROPOSED BUILDING IS SETBACK 15'-3" OR MORE FROM THE UPRR R/W. REQUEST ALLOW THE OUTDOOR ARCADE COLUMNS TO ENCROACH 3’-0” / 7'-0" CLEAR FROM UPRR R/W AND ROOF OVERHANG IS 5'-6" CLEAR.

BUILDING HEIGHT: 35'-0" MAX HEIGHT FOR WITHIN DP ZONE. 94.6% IS BELOW 35'-0" IN HEIGHT. 5.6% OF THE ROOF IS 35' TO 38' IN HEIGHT. 50' FRONT YARD SETBACK: ALLOW PROPOSED BUS CANOPY AT THE BUS STOP AND PROPOSED INFORMATON KIOSKS PLACED WITHIN THIS SETBACK. 1 2
3 4
1 1
2 3
4 21
Request for Deviation: Side Setbacks
REQUESTS FOR DEVIATION: Parking Encroachment
10’ SETBACK ON WEST AND SOUTH SIDES
REQUESTS FOR DEVIATION: Buiding Canopy Encroachment
10’ SETBACK ON NORTH SIDE

EXISTING PARKING AT SOUTH SIDE

EXISTING SETBACK AT NORTH SIDE
2 1
22 Request for Deviation: Building Height
REQUESTS FOR DEVIATION:

BUILDING HEIGHT: FOR WITHIN DP ZONE,
35-FT MAX HEIGHT.

94.6% OF THE PROPOSED DEPOT IS
BELOW 35-FT IN HEIGHT

MIDDLE SKYLIGHT RAISED ROOF AREA,
APPROXIMATELY 5.6% OF THE ROOF RANGES
FROM 35-FT UP TO 38-FT MAXIMUM IN HEIGHT.
3 23
Request for Deviation: Front Setback
REQUESTS FOR DEVIATION:

FRONT YARD SETBACK: 50-FT MIN. FOR BUILDING

DEPOT IS CLEAR OF PUBLIC R/W SETBACK

BUS TURNAROUND CROSSES BETWEEN THE
STREET AND THE DEPOT SITE. TWO BUS STOPS
ARE PROVIDED. THE SHELTER IS LOCATED WITHIN
THE 50-FT SETBACK
4 EXISTING SOUTHERN PACIFIC

CANOPY ELEVATION

PROPOSED

BUS CANOPY ELEVATION
24 ATTACHMENT 2

Presentation on the Final Environmental Impact Report
for the Goleta Train Depot
25 Contact:

City of Goleta Neighborhood Services Department
Jaime Valdez, Neighborhood Services Director
Claudia Dato, Senior Project Manager

GOLETA TRAIN DEPOT
Final Environmental Impact Report
City Council Presentation
January 18, 2022
26 ➢ Initial Study with CEQA checklist completed in May 2020; determined an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was needed and focused issues to be analyzed.
➢ A Notice of Preparation for a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) was issued in May 2020, with comments due in late June 2020. ➢ Rincon Consultants was the lead firm on the environmental review and completed the DEIR in early June 2021.
➢ The City’s Environmental Hearing Officer held a public meeting on June 30, 2021, to take public comments on the DEIR.
➢ 45-day public comment period for review of the DEIR conducted from June 3rd to July 19th, 2021. No comments provided during the June 30, 2021, public hearing.
➢ One comment letter received on the DEIR during the public review period asking for minor revisions related to law enforcement and fire services. ➢ Final EIR (FEIR) released on January 6, 2022.

G o l e t a T r a i n D e p o t
US 101Environmental Review Process
27 Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) prepared to analyze impacts from development of the Goleta Train Depot:
• No significant and unavoidable impacts were identified in the project.
• Project is expected to reduce overall VMT in the area by approximately 6 million miles per year
G o l e t a T r a i n D e p o t
US 101Environmental Review – FEIR
28 Class I Impacts (Significant and Unavoidable): None
Class II Impacts (Significant but Mitigable):
• Biological Resources
• Cultural Resources
• Geology and Soils – paleontological resources
• Hazards and Hazardous Materials
• Tribal Cultural Resources
US 101Environmental Review – Project Specific FEIR
G o l e t a T r a i n D e p o t
29 • Aesthetics
• Agriculture and Forestry
Resources – no impact
• Air Quality
• Energy
• Greenhouse Gas Emissions
• Hydrology and Water Quality
• Land Use
• Noise
• Mineral Resources – no impact
• Population and Housing
• Public Services
• Recreation – no impact
• Transportation
• Utilities and Service Systems
• Wildfire – no impact
US 101Environmental Review – Project Specific FEIR
Class III Impacts (Adverse but Less than Significant):

G o l e t a T r a i n D e p o t
30 Class IV Impacts (Beneficial Impacts):
• Greenhouse Gas Emissions – reduction of regional GHG
emissions by approximately 525,000 MT CO2e
• Transportation – new transit facility that will enhance train service and reduction of regional VMT through increased train ridership
US 101Project Specific FEIR (cont.)
G o l e t a T r a i n D e p o t
31 As required by CEQA, the FEIR also examines alternatives to the proposed project. Those studied include the following two alternatives:
➢ Alternative 1: No Project/Existing Warehouse
➢ Alternative 2: Reduced Depot Footprint and On-Site Amenities The No Project Alternative would not fulfill any Project Objectives because the existing warehouse would remain, and no train station would be developed.

Under Alternative 2, the depot would be reduced in size to approximately 2,000 square feet and would not include a café, meeting room, or formal lobby. It is recommended that the City Council reject Alternative 2 because:
• Environmental impacts, while lessened in some cases, are similar to the Project and would not be significantly lower because substantial demolition and construction still need to occur;
• Alternative 2 would not meet the critical objectives of developing a multi-modal full-service train depot that would increase train ridership and create a regional hub for alternative transportation; and
• Alternative 2 would not meet the TIRCP grant objectives.

US 101Project Alternatives
G o l e t a T r a i n D e p o t
32 Adopt Resolution No. 22-__ entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Goleta, California Certifying the Goleta Train Depot Final Environmental Impact Report
(SCH#2020050499) and Approving the Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Goleta Train
Depot Project Located at 27 South La Patera Lane (City
Capital Improvement Project 9079)”
US 101
Recommended City Council Action:

G o l e t a T r a i n D e p o t
33 ATTACHMENT 3

Resolution of the City Council of the City of Goleta, California Certifying the Goleta Train Depot Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2020050499) and Approving the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Goleta Train Depot Project Located at 27 South La Patera Lane (City Capital Improvement Project 9079) 34 Resolution No. 22-__
Final EIR for Goleta Train Depot Project

RESOLUTION NO. 22- ___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF GOLETA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE GOLETA TRAIN

DEPOT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH
#2020050499) AND APPROVING THE MITIGATION

MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE
GOLETA TRAIN DEPOT PROJECT LOCATED AT 27 SOUTH

LA PATERA LANE AND APPROVING THE PROJECT (CITY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 9079)
The City Council of the City of Goleta does resolve as follows:

SECTION 1: Recitals. The City Council finds and declares that:

A. The State supported Pacific Surfliner passenger rail service was expanded north of Los Angeles in the 1990s, which lead to the Goleta Rail Station opening in 1998; and
B. The current Goleta Rail Station consists primarily of a passenger platform with a 40-foot long canopy and restrooms, which lacks amenities to support existing train passengers and promote new passengers; and C. In 2018 the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments and City of Goleta applied for the California Transit and Capital Rail Capital Program (“TIRCP”) and was awarded $13 million in funding to construct a modern rail depot station and improve connections in order to attract new ridership and accommodate regional transportation plans; and
D. In May 2018, the City closed escrow on the 2.5-acre property located at 27 South La Patera Lane (“Property”) and adjacent to the existing Goleta Rail Station for the purpose of locating the new modern rail depot station on the property (“Goleta Train Depot”); and
E. The Station Area Master Plan was prepared in order to inform the Goleta Train Depot design in terms of site layout, building features and amenities, and circulation and connections, and the City Council unanimously adopted the Station Area Master Plan on February 4, 2020; and
F. The proposed 8,531 square foot Goleta Train Depot includes a ticket office, restrooms, café, community room, and indoor and outdoor waiting areas, as well as 111 parking spaces, information kiosks, bus shelter, and new site landscaping; and
35 Resolution No. 22-__
Final EIR for Goleta Train Depot Project

G. On August 5, 2020, during a Special City Council Meeting, the City Council unanimously selected the traditional theme design for the Goleta Train Depot; and
H. The Design Review Board provided advisory input and guidance at the January 26, 2021, April 27, 2021, and July 13, 2021 meetings and provided input and support of its latest design; and
I. On June 30, 2021, the City of Goleta Environmental Hearing Officer held a public hearing to receive comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report; and
J. The City reviewed the Project’s environmental impacts in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code, §§ 21000, et seq ., "CEQA"), the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 California Code of Regulations, §§ 15000, et seq., the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City’s Environmental Review Guidelines (“Goleta Guidelines”).

SECTION 2: Factual Findings and Conclusions: The City Council finds as follows:

A. The Project site is located at 27 South La Patera Lane consisting of a 2.5- acre property (Assessor’s Parcel No. 073-050-033) currently developed with a 39,800 square-foot warehouse structure. The Project site has a General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan (GP/CLUP) land use designation of Business Park (I-BP) and a Zoning Designation of Business Park (BP).

B. The Property is not located within the Coastal zone.

C. Access to the project site is from South La Patera Lane.

D. The Project includes minor deviations from the requirements of the BP zone district, including encroachment into the southern side setback and to the rear setback on the western edge of the lot in order to provide sufficient parking, minor encroachment into the northern side setback to allow for the outdoor arcade columns of the Depot building to encroach, and minor encroachment into the front setback on the eastern edge of the lot to allow for small ancillary structures, including a bus shelter and information kiosks.

The project also includes a minor deviation from the 35-foot height limitation in order to allow an approximately 5 percent portion of the Train Depot building’s roof peak to extend up to a maximum of 38 feet.

E. The Project is located within Safety Zone 2 of the Santa Barbara Municipal Airport, but transit uses are compatible with Safety Zone 2 and the project would be consistent with the Airport Land Use Plan.
36 Resolution No. 22-__
Final EIR for Goleta Train Depot Project

F. The Property is a generally flat, rectangular-shaped lot.

G. The Property has adequate ingress and egress that also meets Fire Department requirements.

H. The factual findings in this Section are based upon substantial evidence found within the entirety of the administrative record. Notwithstanding the identification of specific facts within this Section, the entire administrative record adequately provides substantial evidence for all findings set forth in this Resolution.

SECTION 3: Environmental Assessment Findings: The City Council makes the following environmental findings pursuant to CEQA § 21081 and CEQA Guidelines 15090 and 15091:

A. The City completed a Final EIR for the Goleta Train Depot Project in accordance with applicable law including, without limitation, CEQA Guidelines §§ 15082, 15083, 15085, 15087 and 15088. The Final EIR is dated October 2021 and entitled “Goleta Train Depot Project Final Environmental Impact Report” (Exhibit 1).

B. The Final EIR was presented to the City Council, which reviews the record of the proceedings and considers all information contained in the Final EIR, its appendices and the testimony and additional information presented at or before all public hearings in accordance with CEQA Guidelines §15090.

C. Based upon the factual findings in Section 2, the Project FEIR identifies potentially significant impacts and mitigation measures to reduce those impacts to a level of insignificance, as summarized in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, provided in Exhibit 2.

D. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15090, the Final EIR reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis. The City Council has independently reviewed and analyzed the Final EIR prepared for the Project. The Final EIR is an accurate and complete statement of the potential environmental impacts of the project. The Final EIR was prepared under the direction of the City of Goleta Neighborhood Services Department and reflects the City Council’s independent judgment and analysis of the environmental impacts and comments received on the Draft EIR and Final EIR.

E. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15091, any changes or alterations required for the project, or incorporated into the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects are identified in the Final EIR. Any 37 Resolution No. 22-__
Final EIR for Goleta Train Depot Project

potential changes or alterations that may be made to the proposed mitigation measures are addressed and analyzed in the Final EIR. None of the facts or circumstances requiring recirculation of the Final EIR has occurred.

F. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines § 15093, a Statement of Overriding Considerations ("SOC") is not required to be included in the project’s record for City Council consideration of the Project because there are no significant and unavoidable impacts.

G. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines §§ 15126.6 and 15364, Final EIR Chapter 6 evaluated a reasonable range of potentially feasible project alternatives which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the effects of the project and evaluate the merits of the alternatives.

1. Section 6 of the Final EIR evaluated the following alternatives:

a. Alternative 1 – No Project/Existing Warehouse Alternative. This alternative assumes that the proposed depot building with indoor waiting areas, café, and restroom facilities, parking lot area, and City and Amtrak signage are not constructed, and the site remains in its existing conditions. This alternative would reduce all the impacts associated with the Project but would not fulfill any Project objectives. b. Alternative 2 – Reduced Depot Footprint and On-site Amenities.

Similar to the Project, this alternative would involve demolition of the existing warehouse to develop the site with a train depot which would support the adjacent Amtrak passenger train platform. However, the Goleta Train Depot under this alternative would be reduced to approximately 2,000 square feet and would only include restrooms, a custodial room, and a small informal waiting area, but not include a café or kitchen area, meeting room, or formal lobby. The impacts of Alternative 2 would be similar to the Project because the existing building would need to be demolished and construction of a new building would be required. However, because of the reduced footprint and size, all impacts under Alternative 2, including air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, noise, transportation, tribal cultural resources, and utilities, such as water demand, would be less than the Project but would not be significantly less in comparison to the Project.

Although impacts are similar and also less than significant under Alternative 2, Alternative 2 would not meet one of the Project’s critical objectives, namely development of a full-service train station that 38 Resolution No. 22-__
Final EIR for Goleta Train Depot Project

includes amenities such as a café, a community meeting space, and a formal lobby/waiting area, the inclusion of which creates a sense of gathering, spaciousness and convenience for patrons of the rail system and visitors of the train station. These amenities all go toward the purposes of attracting greater ridership, providing a more comfortable space for patrons and serving as a community education space. The reduced building size under Alternative 2 would eliminate these amenities, thereby not meeting this critical objective of the Project. In addition, the absence of these amenities would not meet the TIRCP grant objectives of increasing train ridership and creating a regional hub for alternative transportation through the development of a full-service train station.

2. Environmentally Superior Alternative:

CEQA Guidelines § 15126.6(e) (2) requires that an environmentally superior alternative be identified among the alternatives. The environmentally superior alternative is defined as the alternative that would result in the least adverse environmental impacts, when compared to the impacts of the Project. As discussed in Section 6 of the Final EIR, under the No Project Alternative, the existing site and uses would remain. However, the No Project Alternative would not fulfill any Project Objectives because a train depot would not be developed.

In comparison, Alternative 2, Reduced Footprint and On-Site Amenities, results in similar impacts as compared to the Project. While the impacts associated with Alternative 2 would be lower than the Project, they would not be significantly lower because substantial demolition and construction still need to occur. Under the area of Utilities only would Alternative 2 impacts be less than the Project due to reduced water demand from the smaller facility. However, as discussed in the above section, the impacts of Alternative 2 would not be significantly less in comparison to the Project. In addition, Alternative 2 does not include a café, meeting room, and formal waiting room and, therefore, would not meet the critical Project objective of developing a full service train depot that would provide gathering spaces and convenience for patrons, which are intended to increase ridership of the rail system and constitute a space for community education. The absence of these amenities would also not meet the TIRCP grant objectives of increasing train ridership and creating a regional hub for alternative transportation through the development of a full-service train station.

H. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15090, the Final EIR reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis. The City Council has independently 39 Resolution No. 22-__
Final EIR for Goleta Train Depot Project

reviewed and analyzed the Final EIR prepared for the Project. The Final EIR is an accurate and complete statement of the potential environmental impacts of the project. The Final EIR was prepared under the direction of the City of Goleta Neighborhood Services and Public Safety Department and reflects its independent judgment and analysis of the environmental impacts and comments received on the Final EIR.

SECTION 4: General Plan Consistency Findings. As set forth in the Project Final EIR and based on the General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan Consistency Analysis (Exhibit 4), which is incorporated herein by reference, the City Council finds that the Project conforms to the General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan.

SECTION 5: Zoning Ordinance Consistency. As set forth in the Project Final EIR and based on the Zoning Consistency Analysis (Exhibit 5), which is incorporated herein by reference, the City Council finds that the Project is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance, as applicable to the Inland Area, and approves that Project’s minor deviations in setback and height standards:

1. The reduced setbacks will not expose sensitive receptors to greater noise levels because the Project site is located in an industrial area and adjoins the existing railway corridor; and

2. The south side and rear setback deviations facilitate increased parking; and

3. The front setback deviations facilitate greater site amenities for the public through placement of small information kiosks and a bus shelter, thereby encouraging alternative modes of transportation; and

4. The north side setback deviation for the depot facilitates placement of structural columns that create a covered entry and outdoor waiting area for train passengers; and

5. The proposed building height was reviewed by the City’s Design Review Board and is justified because it allows for improved building function and results in a more aesthetic building design by allowing a small percentage (5%) of the roof, along the peak, to exceed the 35-foot maximum height standard.

SECTION 6: Actions. The City Council takes the following actions:

A. Certifies the Final EIR, attached as Exhibit 1, which is incorporated herein by reference, based on the findings outlined in Section 3 above, subject to the MMRP, attached as Exhibit 2, which is incorporated herein by reference, required by CEQA § 21081.6 and CEQA Guidelines § 15097, and find that the 40 Resolution No. 22-__
Final EIR for Goleta Train Depot Project

Final EIR constitutes a complete, accurate, adequate and good faith effort at full disclosure under CEQA.

B. Approves the Goleta Train Depot Project (City Capital Improvement Project 9079), including plans provided in Exhibit 3 to this Resolution, and the associated deviations listed on Plan Sheet L100 detailing the deviations to the setbacks and building height, based on the findings of § 4 above.

C. Directs the City Manager, or designee, to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with CEQA §§ 21152 (f); CEQA Guidelines § 15094; and any other applicable law.

SECTION 7: Reliance on Record. Each and every one of the actions in this Resolution is based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the City Council in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole.

SECTION 8: Limitations. The City Council analysis and evaluation of the project, including this Resolution, are based on the entire record and best information currently available. It is inevitable that in evaluating a project that absolute and perfect knowledge of all possible aspects of the project will not exist. One of the major limitations on analysis of the project is the City Council’s lack of knowledge of future events. In all instances, best efforts have been made to form accurate assumptions.

Somewhat related to this are the limitations on the City's ability to solve what are in effect regional, state, and national problems and issues. The City must work within the political framework within which it exists and with the limitations inherent in that framework.

SECTION 9: Summaries of Information. All summaries of information in the findings, which precede this section, are based on the substantial evidence in the record. The absence of any particular fact from any such summary is not an indication that a particular finding is not based in part on that fact.

SECTION 10: This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption and will remain effective unless superseded by a subsequent Resolution.

SECTION 11: The City Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Resolution to Michelle Greene, City Manager of the City of Goleta, 130 Cremona Suite B, Goleta, CA 93117 and to any other person requesting a copy.

SECTION 12: This Resolution will become effective upon adoption.

SECTION 13: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
41 Resolution No. 22-__
Final EIR for Goleta Train Depot Project

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _____ day of __________, 2022

___________________________

PAULA PEROTTE, MAYOR

ATTEST:

__________________________ ________________________
DEBORAH S. LOPEZ MEGAN GARIBALDI

CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY

42 Resolution No. 22-__
Final EIR for Goleta Train Depot Project

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA )

CITY OF GOLETA )
l, DEBORAH LOPEZ, City Clerk of the City of Goleta, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 22-___ was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Goleta at a regular meeting held on the 18 th day of January, 2022, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

(SEAL)

________________________
Deborah S. Lopez

CITY CLERK
43 Attachment 2, Resolution No. 22-____, Exhibit 1
Fire Station 10 FEIR

EXHIBIT 1

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

GOLETA TRAIN DEPOT PROJECT
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2020050499
Distributed separately
Available at:
https://www.cityofgoleta.org/projects-programs/studies-and-other- projects/goleta-train-depot-project
and available upon request.

44 EXHIBIT 2

Goleta Train Depot Project
Final Environmental Impact Report
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
(Appendix J of FEIR)

45 Attachment 2, Resolution No. 22-____, Exhibit 2
Goleta Train Depot MMRP

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (MMRP)
The Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Goleta Train Depot Project (Project) identifies mitigation measures that will be implemented to reduce the environmental impacts associated with the Project. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) was amended in 1989 to add Section 21081.6, which requires a public agency to adopt a monitoring and reporting program for assessing and ensuring compliance with any required mitigation measures applied to proposed development. As stated in Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code:
... the public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval, adopted in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment.

Section 21081.6 also provides general guidelines for implementing mitigation monitoring programs and indicates that specific reporting and/or monitoring requirements, to be enforced during Project implementation, shall be defined as part of adopting a mitigated negative declaration.

The mitigation monitoring table that follows lists those mitigation measures that may be included as conditions of approval for the Project. To ensure that the mitigation measures are properly implemented, a monitoring program has been devised which identifies the timing and responsibility for monitoring each measure. The Project applicant will have the responsibility for implementing the measures, and the various City of Goleta departments will have the primary responsibility for monitoring and reporting the implementation of the mitigation measures.
46 Attachment 2, Resolution 22-___, Exhibit 2
Goleta Train Depot MMRP

Goleta Train Depot Project Final Environmental Impact Report Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Measure Implemented
By When Implemented Monitoring or Reporting
Action
Verification
of
Completion
Initial Date

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
BIO-1a: Special-status Bat Species
Avoidance an Minimization.

To avoid disturbance of maternal bat
roosts, demolition of the warehouse
building and any other structures that may
support roosting bats shall be conducted
outside of the bat breeding season
(typically April 1 through August 31), if
feasible. If work must begin during the bat
breeding season, a qualified biologist shall
conduct presence/absence surveys for bats
where suitable roosting habitat is present
no more than 30 days prior to initiation of
project activities.

Surveys shall be conducted using acoustic
detectors and by visually searching ledges,
crevices, and overhangs in the warehouse
and any other locations in the study area
where bats may roost.

If a maternal roost is detected, project
activity shall cease. CDFW shall be
Permittee Prior to project construction, a
timeline shall be implemented
which avoids demolition of
structures that may support
roosting bats during bat
breeding season. If not
feasible, a qualified biologist
shall conduct a survey at a
minimum 30 days prior to
initiation of project activities. If
maternal roost is present,
CDFW shall be consulted
immediately.

City staff shall verify
compliance prior to issuance of
a building/grading permit(s).

47 Attachment 2, Resolution No. 22-____, Exhibit 2
Goleta Train Depot MMRP

Mitigation Measure Implemented
By When Implemented Monitoring or Reporting
Action
Verification
of
Completion
Initial Date
consulted to determine if protective
buffers may be established surrounding the
roost, allowing project activities to resume
in other parts of the project site. Demolition
of a structure supporting a maternal roost
shall not occur until the young have left
the site. If a non-breeding roost is detected,
CDFW shall be consulted to determine if
the bats can be safely evicted.

If no roosting bats are observed during pre-
construction surveys, no further actions
would be necessary.

BIO-1b: Preconstruction Nesting Bird
Surveys.

To avoid disturbance of nesting and
special-status birds, including raptor
species protected by the MBTA and CFGC,
project activities including vegetation
removal, ground disturbance, construction,
and demolition shall occur outside of the
bird breeding season (February 1 through
August 31), if feasible.

If work must begin during the breeding
season, a pre-construction nesting bird
survey shall be conducted no more than
seven days prior to initiation of project
activities. The nesting bird survey shall be
conducted inside the project footprint plus a
500-foot for raptors and special-status
Permittee Prior to project construction, a
timeline shall be implemented
which avoids activities that could
disturb nesting and special-
status birds. If not feasible, a
nesting bird survey shall be
conducted a minimum of seven
day prior to initiation of project
activities. If active nests are
observed no activity shall occur
inside a set buffer until it is
determined the nest is no longer
active.

City staff shall verify
compliance prior to issuance of
a building/grading permit(s).

48 Attachment 2, Resolution No. 22-____, Exhibit 2
Goleta Train Depot MMRP

Mitigation Measure Implemented
By When Implemented Monitoring or Reporting
Action
Verification
of
Completion
Initial Date
species and a 300-foot buffer for all other
birds. Inaccessible parts of the survey area
shall be scanned using binoculars to
ensure 100 percent visual coverage. The
survey shall be conducted by a biologist
familiar with the identification of bird
species known to occur in southern
California communities.

If active nests (those containing eggs,
nestlings, or associated with dependent
fledglings) are found on-site, an avoidance
buffer shall be implemented around each
nest and demarcated with fencing or
flagging. The size of the buffers shall be
determined by the biologist based upon the
species, the proposed work activity, and
existing disturbances associated with land
uses outside of the site. No project activity
shall occur inside a nest buffer until the
biologist determines that the nest is no
longer active.

If no nesting birds are observed during pre-
construction surveys, no further actions
would be necessary.

49 Attachment 2, Resolution No. 22-____, Exhibit 2
Goleta Train Depot MMRP

Mitigation Measure Implemented
By When Implemented Monitoring or Reporting
Action
Verification
of
Completion
Initial Date
CULTURAL RESOURCES *
CR-1: Unanticipated Discovery of
Cultural Resources.

If cultural resources are encountered
during ground disturbing activities, work in
the immediate area must halt and an
archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the
Interior’s Professional Qualifications
Standards for archaeology (National Park
Service 1983) should be contacted
immediately to evaluate the find. If the
discovery proves to be eligible for listing on
the California Register of Historical
Resources, additional work may be
warranted, such as data recovery
excavation, Native American consultation,
and archaeological monitoring to treat the
find.

Permittee Continuous monitoring for
cultural resources during
grading activities is required.

This measure is implemented
throughout the duration of
ground-moving activities.

If cultural resources are
encountered, verification of an
archaeologist evaluation of the
find should be provided prior to
the continuance of any
construction activities.

GEOLOGY AND SOILS †
GEO-1 Unanticipated Discover of
Paleontological Resources: In the event
an unanticipated fossil discovery is made
during construction, in accordance with
SVP (2010) guidelines, construction shall
stop within 50 feet of the find or be
Permittee Continuous monitoring for
paleontological resources
during grading activities is
required. This measure is
implemented throughout the
duration of ground-moving
If paleontological resources are
encountered, verification of
coordination with a qualified
paleontologist must be
submitted to the City. The
paleontologist, in coordination

* Also applies to Land Use impacts
† Also applies to Land Use impacts
50 Attachment 2, Resolution No. 22-____, Exhibit 2
Goleta Train Depot MMRP

Mitigation Measure Implemented
By When Implemented Monitoring or Reporting
Action
Verification
of
Completion
Initial Date
redirected to another area of the site and a
qualified professional paleontologist shall
be retained to evaluate the discovery,
determine its significance and if
additional mitigation or treatment is
warranted. Work in the area of the find will
resume once the find is properly
documented and authorization is given to
resume.

activities. with the City, shall give
authorization to resume
construction work.

HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
HAZ-1 Assessment Removal, and
Remediation. Prior to demolition or onsite
grading/site disturbance or improvements,
a soil, soil vapor, and/or groundwater
sampling assessment shall be completed
to identify and/or define hazardous material
impacts in the areas of concern. The areas
of concern and associated chemicals of
concern include:

 Former agricultural use of the
subject property –
pesticides and arsenic;
 Adjacent presence of railroad tracks
along the northern site boundary
which transport and produce
pesticides, heavy metals, petroleum
hydrocarbons, herbicides, and
SVOCs (including creosote,
Permittee Prior to project construction a
sampling assessment shall be
completed, a geophysical
survey shall be conducted to
located historical UST prior to
sampling, and an SMP shall be
prepared. Throughout project
activities, all proper waste
handling and disposal
procedures shall be followed.

Prior to the issuance of
building/grading permit(s) all
necessary reports will be
approved by the Santa Barbara
County Environmental Health –
Hazardous Materials Unit.

Upon completion of
remediation, a report shall be
completed by the City.

51 Attachment 2, Resolution No. 22-____, Exhibit 2
Goleta Train Depot MMRP

Mitigation Measure Implemented
By When Implemented Monitoring or Reporting
Action
Verification
of
Completion
Initial Date
naphthalene);
 Former and current USTs/AST
onsite - historic 6,000- gallon UST,
existing 1,800-gallon diesel UST,
and existing 3,000-gallon AST with
secondary containment and
associated drum that is utilized to
store emergency overflow used oil
onsite - heavy metals, petroleum
hydrocarbons, and VOCs; and
 Former use of a bus ‘service shop’
that includes underground sumps,
trench drains and possibly other
features - heavy metals, petroleum
hydrocarbons, and VOCs.

A geophysical survey shall be conducted to
locate the historical UST prior to sampling.

The sampling assessment shall be
performed under the supervision of a
professional geologist or other qualified
environmental professional. The analytical
results shall be compared to the most
current applicable environmental screening
levels, as recommended by Santa Barbara
County Environmental Health – Hazardous
Materials Unit.

A Soil Management Plan (SMP) shall be
prepared and followed by the
demolition/grading contractor. The SMP
52 Attachment 2, Resolution No. 22-____, Exhibit 2
Goleta Train Depot MMRP

Mitigation Measure Implemented
By When Implemented Monitoring or Reporting
Action
Verification
of
Completion
Initial Date
will identify procedures to address the
current onsite features and unidentified
features (USTs, clarifiers, sumps
or other underground features) that are
uncovered during the redevelopment of the
site. If the sampling assessment
analytical results are greater than the
environmental screening levels, the Santa
Barbara County Environmental Health –
Hazardous Materials Unit shall be
contacted to review and oversee the SMP
and any additional assessments, site
remediation, and/or health risk
assessments that are deemed necessary.

The onsite USTs, AST, drum, trench
drains, and sumps shall be removed in
accordance with local permits and
guidelines as identified and required by
Santa Barbara County Environmental
Health – Hazardous Materials Unit.

All necessary reports, regulations and
permits shall be followed to achieve
remediation of the site. The contaminated
materials shall be remediated under the
supervision of an environmental consultant
licensed to oversee such remediation and
under the direction of the lead oversight
agency. The remediation program shall
also be approved by a regulatory oversight
agency, such as the Santa Barbara County
53 Attachment 2, Resolution No. 22-____, Exhibit 2
Goleta Train Depot MMRP

Mitigation Measure Implemented
By When Implemented Monitoring or Reporting
Action
Verification
of
Completion
Initial Date
Environmental Health – Hazardous
Materials Unit. Alternatively, the Hazardous
Materials Unit may determine that RWQCB
or DTSC should be the lead agency for
remediation oversight.

All proper waste handling and disposal
procedures shall be followed. Upon
completion of the remediation, the
environmental professional shall prepare a
report summarizing the project, the
remediation approach implemented, and
the analytical results after completion
of the remediation (including all waste
disposal or treatment manifests) and site
closure by the lead agency will be
obtained.

HAZ-2: Hazardous Building Material
Survey and Demolition Plan. A
hazardous building material survey
shall be conducted prior to demolition or
removal of any onsite structures. If any
ACM, LBP, or PCBs are identified, the
materials shall be removed in accordance
with California and Federal OSHA as well
as other state and federal regulations by
licensed abatement contractors. All
ACM, LBP, and PCB materials removed
from the site shall be hauled and disposed
Permittee Prior to demolition or removal
of onsite structures a
hazardous building material
survey shall be conducted. If
ACM, LBP, or PCBs are found
they must be removed prior to
demolition or removal of onsite
structures.

Prior to the issuance of
building/grading permit(s) the
City shall receive verification
that a hazardous building
survey has been conducted
and any ACM, LBP, or PCBs
have been removed in
accordance with relevant
regulations, if applicable.

54 Attachment 2, Resolution No. 22-____, Exhibit 2
Goleta Train Depot MMRP

Mitigation Measure Implemented
By When Implemented Monitoring or Reporting
Action
Verification
of
Completion
Initial Date
of by a transportation company
certified to handle these materials.

TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
TCR-1: Archaeological and Native
American Monitoring. Prior to the
issuance of a Grading Permit, or ground
disturbing activities, the developer shall
obtain a qualified archaeological and
Native American monitor for the ground
disturbing activities of the project.

Archaeological monitoring should be
performed under the direction of the
qualified archaeologist, defined as an
archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the
Interior’s Professional Qualifications
Standards for archaeology (NPS 1983).

The qualified archaeologist, in consultation
with the City of Goleta and the Native
American monitor, may recommend the
reduction or termination of monitoring
depending upon observed conditions (i.e.,
no resources encountered within the first
50 percent of ground disturbance).

Permittee Prior to ground-disturbing
activities, an archaeological
and Native American monitor
shall be obtained.

Prior to the issuance of a
grading permit, verification the
applicant has obtained an
archaeological and Native
American monitor shall be sent
to the City.

TCR-2: Unanticipated Discovery of
Tribal Cultural Resources. In the event
that cultural resources of Native American
origin are identified during construction
activity all work shall be halted in the
vicinity of the discovery until the
Permittee Continuous monitoring for
resources of Native American
origin during ground-moving
activities is required. This
measure is implemented
throughout the duration of
If potential resources of Native
American origin are found work
must be halted. Coordination
between the applicant, Native
American consultant, qualified
archaeologist, and the City

55 Attachment 2, Resolution No. 22-____, Exhibit 2
Goleta Train Depot MMRP

Mitigation Measure Implemented
By When Implemented Monitoring or Reporting
Action
Verification
of
Completion
Initial Date
significance of the resource can be
assessed. The city shall begin or continue
Native American consultation procedures,
in coordination with a qualified
archaeologist, if appropriate. If the city, in
consultation with local Native Americans,
determines that the resource is a tribal
cultural resource and thus significant, a
mitigation plan shall be prepared and
implemented in accordance with
state guidelines and in consultation with
local Native American group(s). The
mitigation plan may include but would not
be limited to capping and avoidance,
excavation and removal of the resource,
interpretive displays, sensitive area
signage, or other mutually agreed
upon measure.
ground-moving activities. shall occur.

(End of Exhibit 2, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program) 56 Attachment 2, Resolution No. 22- ___, Exhibit 3
Goleta Train Depot Development Plans

EXHIBIT 3

DEVELOPMENT PLANS

GOLETA TRAIN DEPOT PROJECT

57 1
2 3
4 5
6 SHEET
INDEX
DWG

NUMBER DRAWING TITLE INCLUDED IN
65%
GENERAL :

CIVIL :
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 UTILITIES :

LID-STORM WATER :

LANDSCAPE :

ARCHITECTURAL :
0 SHEET
INDEX
DWG

NUMBER DRAWING TITLE INCLUDED IN
65%
AG-001
AG-002
AG-101
AG-201
AG-202
AG-203
AG-301
AG-501
AG-502
A-110
A-111
A-112
A-115
A-120
A-121
A-122
A-130
A-140
A-141
A-142
A-150
A-171
A-181
A-201
A-301
A-302
A-401
A-402
A-403
A-404
A-405
A-501
A-511
A-521
A-531
A-541
A-551
A-561
A-601
A-611
A-621
A-631
A-641
A-701
A-702
A-711
A-712
A-721
A-722

ARCHITECTURAL ABBREVIATIONS, LEGEND AND SYMBOLS

ARCHITECTURAL GENERAL NOTES

SITE PLAN

ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCY INFORMATION

ADA PATH OF TRAVEL

EXITING PLAN

FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY PLAN
3D EXTERIOR VIEWS
3D INTERIOR VIEWS

GROUND LEVEL PLAN

ENLARGED GROUND LEVEL PLAN - WEST

ENLARGED GROUND LEVEL PLAN - EAST

PLAN SHOWING UPPER WINDOWS

SERVICE LEVEL PLAN

ENLARGED SERVICE LEVEL PLAN - WEST

ENLARGED SERVICE LEVEL PLAN - EAST

ROOF PLAN
REFLECTED CEILING PLAN @ GROUND LEVEL
REFLECTED CEILING PLAN @ GROUND LEVEL - WEST
REFLECTED CEILING PLAN @ GROUND LEVEL - EAST
REFLECTED CEILING PLAN @ SERVICE LEVEL

FINISH PLAN

FURNITURE PLAN

BUILDING ELEVATIONS

BUILDING SECTIONS

BUILDING SECTIONS

ENLARGED INTERIOR ELEVATIONS

ENLARGED INTERIOR ELEVATIONS

ENLARGED INTERIOR ELEVATIONS

ENLARGED INTERIOR ELEVATIONS

ENLARGED INTERIOR ELEVATIONS

WALL AND ROOF SECTION

WALL DETAILS

DOOR DETAILS

WINDOW DETAILS

SKYLIGHT DETAILS

CEILING DETAILS

ROOF DETAILS

ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE

WALL PARTITION TYPE

DOOR TYPE AND SCHEDULE

WINDOW TYPE AND SCHEDULE

SKYLIGHT TYPE

BUS SHELTER - PLANS, ELEVATIONS AND SECTIONS

BUS SHELTER - SECTIONAL DETAILS

TRASH ENCLOSURE - PLANS, ELEVATIONS AND SECTIONS

TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAILS

DISPLAY KIOSK - PLANS, ELEVATIONS AND SECTIONS

DISPLAY KIOSK DETAILS
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
G - 100
G - 101
G - 201
G - 202

G - 203
G - 004

COVER SHEET

DRAWING INDEX

DEPOT RENDERINGS

DEPOT RENDERINGS

DEPOT RENDERINGS

GENERAL NOTES/PROJECT INFORMATION

GENERAL NOTES

DEMOLITION PLAN

PAVING PLAN

HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN

STRIPING PLAN

GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN

GRADING AND DRAINAGE DETAILS

GRADING AND DRAINAGE DETAILS

CIVIL DETAILS

C - 001
C - 101
C - 201
C - 202
C - 203
C - 301
C - 302
C - 303
C - 601

PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER PLAN
LID-001
LID-002
LID-101
LID-102
LID-201
LID-202

GENERAL NOTES

KEY MAP

PLAN SHEET

PLAN ENLARGEMENT SHEET

DETAIL SHEET

DETAIL SHEET
L-100
L-101
L-300
L-301
L-401
L-402
L-501

L-601
L-602
L-611
L-621
L-631
L-641
L-700
L-701
L-751
L-752
L-753
L-761
L-800
L-801
L-802
L-803
L-1001
L-1002

OVERALL LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN & GENERAL NOTES

OVERALL LANDSCAPE SITE AERIAL

LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL SCHEDULES

LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION PLAN (OVERALL)

LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION ENLARGEMENT PLAN (WEST)

LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION ENLARGEMENT PLAN (EAST)

LANDSCAPE SECTIONS & ELEVATIONS

HARDCAPE DETAILS - PAVING

HARDCAPE DETAILS - PAVING

HARDCAPE DETAILS - WALLS

HARDCAPE DETAILS - ORNAMENTAL METAL

HARDCAPE DETAILS - AMENITIES

HARDCAPE DETAILS - FURNISHINGS

IRRIGATION LEGEND, NOTES & CALCULATIONS
IRRIGATION PLAN 1

IRRIGATION DETAILS

IRRIGATION DETAILS

IRRIGATION DETAILS

IRRIGATION SCHEDULES

PLANTING LEGEND & NOTES

TREE PLANTING PLAN

SHRUB PLANTING PLAN

SHRUB PLANTING PLAN

PLANTING DETAILS

PLANTING DETAILS

E-101
E-102
E-103
E-104
E-105
E-106
E-107
E-108
E-109
E-110
E-111
E-112
E-113
E-114

ELECTRICAL ABBREVIATIONS, GENERAL NOTES AND SYMBOLS

OVERALL SITE PLAN

GROUND LEVEL POWER PLAN - WEST

GROUND LEVEL POWER PLAN - EAST

GROUND LEVEL LIGHTING PLAN - WEST

GROUND LEVEL LIGHTING PLAN - EAST

SERVICE LEVEL LIGHTING PLAN - WEST

SERVICE LEVEL LIGHTING PLAN - EAST

CEILING LIGHTING PLAN

GROUND LEVEL GROUNDING PLAN

SERVICE LEVEL GROUNDING PLAN

GROUND LEVEL SECURITY PLAN - WEST

GROUND LEVEL SECURITY PLAN - EAST

CEILING SECURITY PLAN
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
0 SHEET
INDEX
DWG

NUMBER DRAWING TITLE INCLUDED IN
65%
ELECTRICAL :

E-115
E-116
E-117
E-118
E-119
E-120
E-121
E-122
E-123

LIGHTING CONTROL WIRING DIAGRAM

SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM

PANEL SCHEDULES

PANEL & LIGHTING FIXTURES SCHEDULE
MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS SHEET 1 OF 3
MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS SHEET 2 OF 3
MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS SHEET 3 OF 3

SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN

DEPOT PHOTOMETRIC PLAN
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
U - 301 X Anil Verm
a Associates, Inc.
1-800
Service Alert
Underground
227-2600
U
GI
D
F EOR
B
L
E
AC
L
OY

TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG
Call: TOLL FREE
Use of the plans and specifications
contained herein shall be restricted to the
original site for which they were prepared;
publication thereof is expressly limited to
such use. Reproduction, publication, or
reuse by any method, in whole or in part,
without the express written consent of Anil
Verma Assoc. is prohibited. Title to said
plans remains the sole property of Anil
Verma Assoc.; visual contact shall constitute
acceptance of these restrictions.
444 SOUTH FLOWER STREET, SUITE 1688, LOS ANGELES CA. 90071 PH: (213) 624-6908, Fax: (213) 624 -1188, www.anilverma.com 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 KJIHGFEDCBA JIHGFEDCBA

REVISION REMARKS DATE
2 C
1 B
A 65% COMPLETE SUBMITTAL 11/18/2021
2019-GTD

DRAWING CONTENTS

ISSUE DATE

ISSUED AS
SCALE

JOB NUMBER

GOLETA TRAIN DEPOT

CITY OF GOLETA
130 CREMONA DRIVE, STE B, GOLETA, CA 93117
27 SOUTH LA PATERA LANE, GOLETA, CA 93117
11/18/2021
65%

SUBMITTAL

PLAN CHECK
#XXXXXXXXX

SIGNATURE
DATE

RENEWAL DATE
65% 11-18-2021
ALL IDEAS, DESIGN ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY AND THE PROPERTY OF ANIL VERMA ASSOCIATES, INC. AND WERE CREATED EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON AND IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON FIRM OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ANIL VERMA ASSOCIATES, INC.

SEAL
1/4" = 1'-0" SHEET INDEX
G-101
G201

SITE RENDERING
SHEET 03 OF 184
DRAFT 65%

PROGRESS SET
65% DESIGN

DEVELOPMENT

KISS N' RIDE

PARK N RIDE STALLS
(X 111 +/-)

EXISTING BUS

CANOPY WITHIN

UPRR R/W

EXISTING PLATFORM
TRASH

BUS STOP

BUS STOP

PROPOSED TRAIN DEPOT

UPRR R/W
S. LA PATERA LN
58 BATTERY ROOM

TRASH ENCLOSURE
16'-8"
NO

PARKING

WAYWRONG
ONLY

VEHICLES

AUTHORIZED
NO

PARKING

OVERALL GROUND LEVEL CONSTRUCTION PLAN
ALL IDEAS, DESIGN ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY AND THE PROPERTY OF ANIL VERMA ASSOCIATES, INC. AND WERE CREATED EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON AND IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON FIRM OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ANIL VERMA ASSOCIATES, INC.

SIGNATURE
DATE
STAT
E
O
F
C
A
L
IFO
RNIA
RENEWAL DATE Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

DRAFT65% 11-18-2021
2019-GTD

DRAWING CONTENTS

ISSUE DATE

ISSUED AS
SCALE

JOB NUMBER

GOLETA TRAIN DEPOT

CITY OF GOLETA
130 CREMONA DRIVE, STE B, GOLETA, CA 93117
27 SOUTH LA PATERA LANE, GOLETA, CA 93117
11/18/2021
DRAFT 65%

PROGRESS SET

REVISION REMARKS DATE

PLAN CHECK
#XXXXXXXXX
2 C
1 B
A 35% COMPLETE SUBMITTAL X/XX/202X

J I H G F E D C B A
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 K J I H G F E D C B A
L100
Overall Landscape
Site Plan
SHEET x OF xx
SCALE" 1/16" = 1'-0"
S.LA PATERA LN.

EXISTING AMTRAK PLATFORM

PROPOSED DEPOT

UPRR R/W

UPRR R/W

WEST PLAZA

EAST PLAZA

EXISTING

GENERATOR
L.I.D. PLANTER
SHEET 23 OF 184
65% DESIGN

DEVELOPMENT
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
15 16
13 14
19 20
17 18
23 24
21 22
27 28
25 26
90 91
88 89
94 95
92 93
98 96
97 99
100
86 87
85 83
84 81
82 31
32 29
30 35
36 33
34 43
44 41
42 39
40 37
38 49
48 50
45 47
46 51
52 54
55 56
57 53
62 63
64 65
66 59
58 61
60 68
67 70
69 72
71 74
73 76
75 78
77 80
79 101
102
103
104
105
109
110
111
106
107
108

DROP -OFF

BUS STOP

BUS STOP
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV

PARK N RIDE STALLS
(X 111 +/-)
S. LA PATERA LN

UPRR R/W

EXISTING PLATFORM
TRASH
10'-0"
10'-0"
50'-0"
50'-0"
50'-0"

UPRR R/W

ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE

ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE

PUBLIC R/W

ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE
10' SIDEYARD

SETBACK
10' SIDEYARD

SETBACK
10' REAR

SETBACK
50' FRONT YARD

SETBACK

BUS CANOPY
KIOSK
15'-6"
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"

EASEMENT

PUBLIC R/W

EXISTING PAVING TO

REMAIN IN PLACE
REQUESTS FOR DEVIATION:
* 10' SIDEYARD SETBACK (17.09.030) FROM SOUTH AND WEST SIDEYARDS. REDUCE TO 6'-0" AS CURRENTLY SHOWN. THE SETBACK HAS A 5' LANDSCAPE STRIP AND HAS A FULL HEIGHT BARRIER FENCE. ADJACENT PARKING STALLS ARE CURRENTLY 18'-6" DEEP, 24" LONGER THAN STANDARD.
* 10' SIDEYARD SETBACK FOR BUILDING (17.09.030) SETBACK FROM UPRR R/W. EXISTING BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHED IS BUILT DIRECTLY ON THE R/W. PROPOSED BUILDING IS SETBACK 15'-3" OR MORE FROM THE UPRR R/W. HOWEVER, THE OUTDOOR ARCADE COLUMNS ARE 7'-0" CLEAR FROM UPRR R/W AND ROOF OVERHANG IS 5'-6" CLEAR. * BUILDING HEIGHT: FOR WITHIN DP ZONE, 35'-0" MAX HEIGHT. 94.6% OF THE PROPOSED DEPOT IS BELOW 35'-0" IN HEIGHT HOWEVER, AT THE MIDDLE SKYLIGHT RAISED ROOF AREA, APPROXIMATELY 5.6% OF THE ROOF HEIGHT HAS AN ELEVATION OF 35' TO 38' IN HEIGHT. * 50' FRONT YARD SETBACK: THE PROPOSED DEPOT IS WELL CLEAR OF THIS SETBACK DISTANCE. HOWEVER, THERE IS A PROPOSED BUS CANOPY AT THE BUS STOP AND PROPOSED INFORMATON KIOSKS PLACED WITHIN THIS SETBACK. CONFIRM THIS IS ACCEPTABLE. 5% OF ROOF
AREA 35'-38'

HEIGHT AFF
95% OF ROOF

AREA BELOW
35' HEIGHT AFF

ROOF PLAN FOR TRAIN DEPOT (NTS)
59 Anil Verm
a Associates, Inc.
1-800
Service Alert
Underground
227-2600
U
GI
D
F EOR
B
L
E
AC
L
OY

TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG
Call: TOLL FREE
Use of the plans and specifications
contained herein shall be restricted to the
original site for which they were prepared;
publication thereof is expressly limited to
such use. Reproduction, publication, or
reuse by any method, in whole or in part,
without the express written consent of Anil
Verma Assoc. is prohibited. Title to said
plans remains the sole property of Anil
Verma Assoc.; visual contact shall constitute
acceptance of these restrictions.
444 SOUTH FLOWER STREET, SUITE 1688, LOS ANGELES CA. 90071 PH: (213) 624-6908, Fax: (213) 624 -1188, www.anilverma.com 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 KJIHGFEDCBA JIHGFEDCBA

REVISION REMARKS DATE
2 C
1 B
A 65% COMPLETE SUBMITTAL 11/18/2021
2019-GTD

DRAWING CONTENTS

ISSUE DATE

ISSUED AS
SCALE

JOB NUMBER

GOLETA TRAIN DEPOT

CITY OF GOLETA
130 CREMONA DRIVE, STE B, GOLETA, CA 93117
27 SOUTH LA PATERA LANE, GOLETA, CA 93117
11/18/2021
65% DESIGN

DEVELOPMENT

PLAN CHECK
#XXXXXXXXX

SIGNATURE
DATE

RENEWAL DATE
65% 11-18-2021
ALL IDEAS, DESIGN ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY AND THE PROPERTY OF ANIL VERMA ASSOCIATES, INC. AND WERE CREATED EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON AND IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON FIRM OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ANIL VERMA ASSOCIATES, INC.

SEAL 3D Depot Views
G-202
G-202
3D Aerial View - Architectural 1
G-202
3D Aerial View - Structural 2
G-202
3D Normal View - Architectural 3
G-202
3D Normal View - Structural 4
SHEET 04 OF 184
60 NO

PARKING

WAYWRONG
ONLY

VEHICLES

AUTHORIZED
NO

PARKING

LA PATERA LANE

PROPOSED TRAIN DEPOT BUILDING
ALL IDEAS, DESIGN ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY AND THE PROPERTY OF ANIL VERMA ASSOCIATES, INC. AND WERE CREATED EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON AND IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON FIRM OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ANIL VERMA ASSOCIATES, INC.

DRAFT 65% 11-1-2021
2019-GTD

DRAWING CONTENTS

ISSUE DATE

ISSUED AS
SCALE

JOB NUMBER

GOLETA TRAIN DEPOT

CITY OF GOLETA
130 CREMONA DRIVE, STE B, GOLETA, CA 93117
27 SOUTH LA PATERA LANE, GOLETA, CA 93117
11/18/21
65% DESIGN

DEVELOPMENT

REVISION REMARKS DATE

PLAN CHECK
#XXXXXXXXX
2 C
1 B
A 65% COMPLETE SUBMITTAL X/XX/202X

J I H G F E D C B A
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 K J I H G F E D C B A

RA PRLI OS
15265 ALTON PKWY, STE 140
IRVINE, CA 92618
WWW.RAIL PROS.COM
E-MAIL: [email protected]
PHONE: (714) 734 - 8765

SHEET OF
Z:\Engineering\City of Goleta\Train Depot\900 CADD\950 Drawings\C-201 - PAVING PLAN.dwg C-201
Paving Plan
CONSTRUCTION NOTES: LEGEND:
65% SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
SHEET 08 OF 184
11/18/2021
61 Historical Display Kiosk
ATM Machine

COMMUNITYMEETINGROOM
8 FURNITURE

STORAGE
9 ELEC RM
7 BIKE ROOM
5 VESTIBULE-1
6 CONCOURSEAND WAITING
AREA
1 WOMEN'STOILET
4 OFFICE
3 TICKET BOOTH
2 COFFEE SHOP
15 VESTIBULE-2
13 JANITOR RM
12 MEN'S TOILET
14 STORAGE
11 PLUMBING RM
10 BATTERY ROOM

TRASH ENCLOSURE
16'-8"
NO

PARKING

WAYWRONG
ONLY

VEHICLES

AUTHORIZED
NO

PARKING
ALL IDEAS, DESIGN ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY AND THE PROPERTY OF ANIL VERMA ASSOCIATES, INC. AND WERE CREATED EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON AND IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON FIRM OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ANIL VERMA ASSOCIATES, INC.

SIGNATURE
DATE
STATE
O
F
C
A
L
IF
O
RNIA
RENEWAL DATE Anil Verma Associates, Inc.

DRAFT65% 11-18-2021
2019-GTD

DRAWING CONTENTS

ISSUE DATE

ISSUED AS
SCALE

JOB NUMBER

GOLETA TRAIN DEPOT

CITY OF GOLETA
130 CREMONA DRIVE, STE B, GOLETA, CA 93117
27 SOUTH LA PATERA LANE, GOLETA, CA 93117
11/18/2021
DRAFT 65%

PROGRESS SET

REVISION REMARKS DATE

PLAN CHECK
#XXXXXXXXX
2 C
1 B
A 35% COMPLETE SUBMITTAL X/XX/202X

J I H G F E D C B A
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 K J I H G F E D C B A
L801 Planting Plan
SHEET x OF xx
HA
SC
LF
HW
BG
VL
ES
QA
DB
HW
SC
AC
AC
SS
QA
BG
CO
LF
SS
LC
CO
BG
HA
EB
OE
EG BG
ES
QA
GS
MR
CO
HA
GS
BG
CO
SC
BG
GS
VL
RL
SS
LC
LF
SS
SA
HW
VL
DB
BG
LF
LC
EB
OE
GS
HA
LC
AP
RC
CF
RC
AP
HA
EB
OE
SS
SA
RC
SS
PI
BG
RC
SHEET 44 OF 184
65% DESIGN

DEVELOPMENT
62 FS 33.96
FS 33.80
FS 33.74
TS 36.02
BS 33.94
NO

PARKING
NO

PARKING
WAY
WRONG
ONLY

VEHICLES

AUTHORIZED
NO

PARKING
N
20' 10' 0 20' 40'
Anil Verma Associates, Inc.
1-800
Service Alert
Underground
227-2600
U GID
F
E
OR
B L
E
ACL
OY

TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG
Call: TOLL FREE
Use of the plans and specifications
contained herein shall be restricted to the
original site for which they were prepared;
publication thereof is expressly limited to
such use. Reproduction, publication, or
reuse by any method, in whole or in part,
without the express written consent of Anil
Verma Assoc. is prohibited. Title to said
plans remains the sole property of Anil
Verma Assoc.; visual contact shall constitute
acceptance of these restrictions.
444 SOUTH FLOWER STREET, SUITE 1688, LOS ANGELES CA. 90071 PH: (213) 624-6908, Fax: (213) 624-1188, www.anilverma.com 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 KJ

IHGFEDCBA JIHGFEDCBA

REVISIONREMARKSDATE
2 C
1 B
A65% COMPLETE SUBMITTAL11/18/2021
2019-GTD

DRAWING CONTENTS

ISSUE DATE

ISSUED AS
SCALE

JOB NUMBER

GOLETA TRAIN DEPOT

CITY OF GOLETA
130 CREMONA DRIVE, STE B, GOLETA, CA 93117
27 SOUTH LA PATERA LANE, GOLETA, CA 93117
11/18/2021
65% DESIGN

DEVELOPMENT

PLAN CHECK
#XXXXXXXXX

SIGNATURE
DATE

RENEWAL DATE
65% 11-18-2021
ALL IDEAS, DESIGN ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY AND THE PROPERTY OF ANIL VERMA ASSOCIATES, INC. AND WERE CREATED EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON AND IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON FIRM OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ANIL VERMA ASSOCIATES, INC.

SEAL
1" = 20'-0"SITE PLAN
AG-101
1" = 20'-0" AG-101
SITE PLAN 1
SHEET 51 OF 184
63 FS 33.96
FS 33.80
FS 33.74
TS 36.02
BS 33.94
NO

PARKING
NO

PARKING
WAY
WRONG
ONLY

VEHICLES

AUTHORIZED
NO

PARKING

FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS LANE

FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS LANE
29' - 5 1/2"
26' - 0"
26' - 0"
38' - 2"
26' - 0"
24' - 2 3/4"
TABLE 601 - FIRE RESISTANCE REQUIREMENTS

BUILDING ELEMENT TYPE VB
PRIMARY STRUCTURAL FRAME 0 BEARING WALLS 0 NON-BEARING INTERIOR PARTITIONS 0 ROOF CONSTRUCTION 0 THE REQUIRED FIREFLOW IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CALCULATIONS:

1. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION PER BUILDING CODE TYPE V-B

2. FIRE-FLOW CALCULATION AREA 8,531 SF

3. FIRE-FLOW BASED ON THE FIRE-FLOW CALCULATION AREA 2,500 GPM 25% OF THE VALUE (PER TABLE B105.1(2)

4. TOTAL FIRE-FLOW REQUIRED 625 GPM

5. FLOW DURATION (PER TABLE B105.1(2) 2 HOURS

6. NUMBER OF FIRE HYDRANTS (PER TABLE C 102.1) 1 C. FIRE FLOW DATA:

1. USE TRANSPORTATION

WAITING STATION

2. TYPE OF OCCUPANCY: A-3

3. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-B

4. SPRINKLERS: PER SECTION 903.3.1.1

5. BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED: 60 FEET

6. NUMBER OF STORIES ALLOWED: 1

7. FLOOR AREA 8,531 SF B. HEIGHT, AREA AND CODE COMPLIANCE:

THIS PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING CODES:
2021 EDITION CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE
2021 EDITION COUNTY FIRE CODE
2021 EDITION CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE
2021 EDITION CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE
2021 EDITION CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE
2021 EDITION CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE
2021 EDITION CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE
A. CODE COMPLIANCE:

N
20' 10' 0 20' 40'
Anil Verma Associates, Inc.
1-800
Service Alert
Underground
227-2600
U GID
F
E
OR
B L
E
ACL
OY

TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG
Call: TOLL FREE
Use of the plans and specifications
contained herein shall be restricted to the
original site for which they were prepared;
publication thereof is expressly limited to
such use. Reproduction, publication, or
reuse by any method, in whole or in part,
without the express written consent of Anil
Verma Assoc. is prohibited. Title to said
plans remains the sole property of Anil
Verma Assoc.; visual contact shall constitute
acceptance of these restrictions.
444 SOUTH FLOWER STREET, SUITE 1688, LOS ANGELES CA. 90071 PH: (213) 624-6908, Fax: (213) 624-1188, www.anilverma.com 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 KJ

IHGFEDCBA JIHGFEDCBA

REVISIONREMARKSDATE
2 C
1 B
A65% COMPLETE SUBMITTAL11/18/2021
2019-GTD

DRAWING CONTENTS

ISSUE DATE

ISSUED AS
SCALE

JOB NUMBER

GOLETA TRAIN DEPOT

CITY OF GOLETA
130 CREMONA DRIVE, STE B, GOLETA, CA 93117
27 SOUTH LA PATERA LANE, GOLETA, CA 93117
11/18/2021
65% DESIGN

DEVELOPMENT

PLAN CHECK
#XXXXXXXXX

SIGNATURE
DATE

RENEWAL DATE
65% 11-18-2021
ALL IDEAS, DESIGN ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY AND THE PROPERTY OF ANIL VERMA ASSOCIATES, INC. AND WERE CREATED EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON AND IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON FIRM OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ANIL VERMA ASSOCIATES, INC.

SEAL
As indicatedFIRE AND LIFE SAFETY PLAN
AG-301
1" = 20'-0" AG-301
FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY PLAN 1
SHEET 55 OF 184
64 Anil Verma Associates, Inc.
1-800
Service Alert
Underground
227-2600
U GID
F
E
OR
B L
E
ACL
OY

TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG
Call: TOLL FREE
Use of the plans and specifications
contained herein shall be restricted to the
original site for which they were prepared;
publication thereof is expressly limited to
such use. Reproduction, publication, or
reuse by any method, in whole or in part,
without the express written consent of Anil
Verma Assoc. is prohibited. Title to said
plans remains the sole property of Anil
Verma Assoc.; visual contact shall constitute
acceptance of these restrictions.
444 SOUTH FLOWER STREET, SUITE 1688, LOS ANGELES CA. 90071 PH: (213) 624-6908, Fax: (213) 624-1188, www.anilverma.com 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 KJ

IHGFEDCBA JIHGFEDCBA

REVISIONREMARKSDATE
2 C
1 B
A65% COMPLETE SUBMITTAL11/18/2021
2019-GTD

DRAWING CONTENTS

ISSUE DATE

ISSUED AS
SCALE

JOB NUMBER

GOLETA TRAIN DEPOT

CITY OF GOLETA
130 CREMONA DRIVE, STE B, GOLETA, CA 93117
27 SOUTH LA PATERA LANE, GOLETA, CA 93117
11/18/2021
65% DESIGN

DEVELOPMENT

PLAN CHECK
#XXXXXXXXX

SIGNATURE
DATE

RENEWAL DATE
65% 11-18-2021
ALL IDEAS, DESIGN ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY AND THE PROPERTY OF ANIL VERMA ASSOCIATES, INC. AND WERE CREATED EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON AND IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON FIRM OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ANIL VERMA ASSOCIATES, INC.

SEAL3D EXTERIOR VIEWS
AG-501
3D EXTERIOR VIEWS
SHEET 56 OF 184
65 GROUND LEVEL
0' - 0"
2 A-301
1 A-302
2 A-302
3 A-302
4 A-302

TESLA GLASS TILE

SHINGLES LAYED

OVER EPIC METAL

SLOPED ROOFING,
TYP

SKYLIGHT

SKYLIGHT

METAL FRAMING,

PAINT FINISH, SSD

SKYLIGHT PHENOLIC WALL

PANEL - TYPE A,
TYP
1234567891011121314

PERFORATED

MTL SCREEN

TO COVER A/C

UNIT, TYP
ROOF BEAM APEX - 4
36' - 3 1/4"
ROOF BEAM APEX - 3
31' - 3 1/4"
ROOF BEAM APEX - 2
26' - 3 1/4"
ROOF BEAM APEX - 1
21' - 7 1/4"

SERVICE LEVEL
13' - 8"
2" THK x 14" HIGH

METAL STATION

SIGNAGE WITH LED

LIGHTING

FIBER CEMENT

SHINGLE

SHAKE SIDING

GROUND LEVEL
0' - 0"
2 A-301
1 A-302
2 A-302
3 A-302
4 A-302

TESLA PHOTOVOLTAIC

GLASS TILE SHINGLES

LAYED OVER EPIC

METAL ROOFING, TYP

SKYLIGHTMETAL FRAMING,

PAINT FINISH, SSD

PHENOLIC WALL

PANEL - TYPE A,
TYP

SKYLIGHT

SKYLIGHT
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
ROOF BEAM APEX - 4
36' - 3 1/4"
ROOF BEAM APEX - 3
31' - 3 1/4"
ROOF BEAM APEX - 2
26' - 3 1/4"
ROOF BEAM APEX - 1
21' - 7 1/4"

SERVICE LEVEL
13' - 8"

TESLA GLASS TILE

SHINGLES LAYED

OVER EPIC METAL

ROOFING, TYP
2" THK x 14" HIGH

METAL STATION

SIGNAGE WITH

LED LIGHTING

FIBER CEMENT

SHINGLE

SHAKE SIDING

GROUND LEVEL
0' - 0"
1 A-301

METAL FRAMING,

PAINT FINISH, SSD

PHENOLIC WALL

PANEL - TYPE A, TYP

A B C D E F G H
ROOF BEAM APEX - 4
36' - 3 1/4"
ROOF BEAM APEX - 3
31' - 3 1/4"
ROOF BEAM APEX - 2
26' - 3 1/4"
ROOF BEAM APEX - 1
21' - 7 1/4"

SERVICE LEVEL
13' - 8"

TESLA PHOTOVOLTAIC

GLASS TILE SHINGLES

LAYED OVER EPIC METAL

SLOPED ROOFING, TYP

TESLA GLASS TILE

SHINGLES LAYED OVER

EPIC METAL SLOPED

ROOFING, TYP

FIBER CEMENT

SHINGLE

SHAKE SIDING

PHENOLIC WALL

PANEL - TYPE A, TYP

GROUND LEVEL
0' - 0"
1 A-301

ABCDEFGH
ROOF BEAM APEX - 4
36' - 3 1/4"
ROOF BEAM APEX - 3
31' - 3 1/4"
ROOF BEAM APEX - 2
26' - 3 1/4"
ROOF BEAM APEX - 1
21' - 7 1/4"

SERVICE LEVEL
13' - 8"

METAL FRAMING,

PAINT FINISH, SSD

PHENOLIC WALL

PANEL - TYPE A, TYP

FIBER CEMENT SHINGLE

SHAKE SIDING

TESLA GLASS TILE

SHINGLES LAYED

OVER EPIC METAL

SLOPED ROOFING, TYP

PHENOLIC WALL

PANEL - TYPE A, TYP
NOTE:

1. ALL LEVELS OF ELEVATION AND SECTION OF TRAIN
DEPOT BUILDING GROUND LEVEL 0' - 0" SHALL EQUAL
TO FF 36.50

2. ALL SUCCEEDING LEVELS SHALL REFER TO THIS.
16'1' 0 8' 4'
Anil Verma Associates, Inc.
1-800
Service Alert
Underground
227-2600
U GID
F
E
OR
B L
E
ACL
OY

TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG
Call: TOLL FREE
Use of the plans and specifications
contained herein shall be restricted to the
original site for which they were prepared;
publication thereof is expressly limited to
such use. Reproduction, publication, or
reuse by any method, in whole or in part,
without the express written consent of Anil
Verma Assoc. is prohibited. Title to said
plans remains the sole property of Anil
Verma Assoc.; visual contact shall constitute
acceptance of these restrictions.
444 SOUTH FLOWER STREET, SUITE 1688, LOS ANGELES CA. 90071 PH: (213) 624-6908, Fax: (213) 624-1188, www.anilverma.com 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 KJ

IHGFEDCBA JIHGFEDCBA

REVISIONREMARKSDATE
2 C
1 B
A65% COMPLETE SUBMITTAL11/18/2021
2019-GTD

DRAWING CONTENTS

ISSUE DATE

ISSUED AS
SCALE

JOB NUMBER

GOLETA TRAIN DEPOT

CITY OF GOLETA
130 CREMONA DRIVE, STE B, GOLETA, CA 93117
27 SOUTH LA PATERA LANE, GOLETA, CA 93117
11/18/2021
65% DESIGN

DEVELOPMENT

PLAN CHECK
#XXXXXXXXX

SIGNATURE
DATE

RENEWAL DATE
65% 11-18-2021
ALL IDEAS, DESIGN ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY AND THE PROPERTY OF ANIL VERMA ASSOCIATES, INC. AND WERE CREATED EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON AND IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON FIRM OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ANIL VERMA ASSOCIATES, INC.

SEAL
As indicatedBUILDING ELEVATIONS
A-201
1/8" = 1'-0" A-201
NORTH ELEVATION 1
1/8" = 1'-0" A-201
SOUTH ELEVATION 2
1/8" = 1'-0" A-201
WEST ELEVATION 4
1/8" = 1'-0" A-201
EAST ELEVATION 3
SHEET 72 OF 184
66 1 2 3 4
A
6 A-701
8' - 0" 16' - 0" 8' - 0"
32' - 0"
6" X 6" TUBULAR STEEL POST

ENCLOSED WITH WOODEN

CASING, TYP, SSD
7 A-701

ELEC PULL BOX

CONCRETE PLINTH
1 2 3 4
A
6 A-701
12' - 10"
6' - 5"6' - 5"
44' - 10"
7 A-701
12' - 0"
44' - 0"

ROOF SHIGLES
8' - 0" 16' - 0" 8' - 0"

PERIMETER ROOF GUTTER
1 2 3 4
A
6 A-701
2' - 1"
4"
4' - 0" 8' - 0" 16' - 0" 8' - 0" 4' - 0"
0' - 4"
2' - 1"
44' - 10"
2' - 1"
4"
4' - 0"4' - 0"
4"
2' - 1"
12' - 10" 7
A-701
2' x 4' METAL CEILING PANEL,
PAINT FIN.

EPIC ROOF DECKING
Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
10' - 0"
1 2 3 4

ROOF SHINGLES
1' - 6"

ELEC PULL BOX

CONCRETE PLINTH
Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
10' - 0"
A
Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
10' - 0"
A
7 A-701
A-702
1 ELEC PULL BOX
Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
10' - 0"
1 2 3 46
A-701
A-702
2 8'1' 0 2' 4'
Anil Verma Associates, Inc.
1-800
Service Alert
Underground
227-2600
U GID
F
E
OR
B L
E
ACL
OY

TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG
Call: TOLL FREE
Use of the plans and specifications
contained herein shall be restricted to the
original site for which they were prepared;
publication thereof is expressly limited to
such use. Reproduction, publication, or
reuse by any method, in whole or in part,
without the express written consent of Anil
Verma Assoc. is prohibited. Title to said
plans remains the sole property of Anil
Verma Assoc.; visual contact shall constitute
acceptance of these restrictions.
444 SOUTH FLOWER STREET, SUITE 1688, LOS ANGELES CA. 90071 PH: (213) 624-6908, Fax: (213) 624-1188, www.anilverma.com 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 KJ

IHGFEDCBA JIHGFEDCBA

REVISIONREMARKSDATE
2 C
1 B
A65% COMPLETE SUBMITTAL11/18/2021
2019-GTD

DRAWING CONTENTS

ISSUE DATE

ISSUED AS
SCALE

JOB NUMBER

GOLETA TRAIN DEPOT

CITY OF GOLETA
130 CREMONA DRIVE, STE B, GOLETA, CA 93117
27 SOUTH LA PATERA LANE, GOLETA, CA 93117
11/18/2021
65% DESIGN

DEVELOPMENT

PLAN CHECK
#XXXXXXXXX

SIGNATURE
DATE

RENEWAL DATE
65% 11-18-2021
ALL IDEAS, DESIGN ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY AND THE PROPERTY OF ANIL VERMA ASSOCIATES, INC. AND WERE CREATED EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON AND IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON FIRM OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ANIL VERMA ASSOCIATES, INC.

SEAL
1/4" = 1'-0"BUS SHELTER
A-701
1/4" = 1'-0" A-701
BUS SHED - FLOOR PLAN 1
1/4" = 1'-0" A-701
BUS SHED - ROOF PLAN 2
1/4" = 1'-0" A-701
BUS SHED - REFLECTED CEILING PLAN 3
1/4" = 1'-0" A-701
BUS SHED - SOUTH ELEVATION 4
1/4" = 1'-0" A-701
BUS SHED - WEST ELEVATION 5
1/4" = 1'-0" A-701
BUS SHED - TRANSVERSE SECTION 6
1/4" = 1'-0" A-701
BUS SHED - LONGITUDINAL SECTION 7
SHEET 92 OF 184
67 A-711
3 A-711 4
A-711
5 A-7116
7 A-711
8 A-711
TRASH
4 cu yds FOOD SCRAPS
2 cu yds

BATTERY
ROOM

RECYCLE
4 cu yds
6" x 8" HIGH

CONCRETE CURB

GREASETRASH
ROOM

HOLLOW METAL

DOOR AND FRAME
8" x 8" STRUCT COL, SSD
1 2
3 8" 10' - 0" 5' - 4" 8"
15' - 4"
6' - 8" 4' - 8" 10' - 8"
22' - 0"

BOLT SLEEVE
6" x 8" HIGH

CONCRETE
CURB
7 A-711
8 A-711

METAL ROOFING

METAL GUTTER
1 2
3 2' - 8" 15' - 4" 2' - 8"
20' - 8"
13' - 8" 13' - 8"
27' - 4"
7 A-711

STL SWING GATE

STRUCT COL, SSD
Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
8' - 6"
Level 3
10' - 8"
1 2
8 A-711
8' X 16" CMU SPLIT FACE

SINGLE SCORE

TEXTURED, TYP
8' X 16" CMU STD SMOOTH

SINGLE SCORE, TYP
8' X 16" CMU SPLIT FACE
8-RIB SPLIT, TYP

WINGED ROOF, SSD FOR

FRAMING
Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
8' - 6"
Level 3
10' - 8"
3 7
A-711
Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
8' - 6"
Level 3
10' - 8"
12 6' - 8"8"8"8"
3' - 5 1/2" 8' - 8"
12' - 1 1/2"
8 A-711
Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
8' - 6"
Level 3
10' - 8"
3 8"8"8" 6' - 8"
8' - 6"
1' - 1 5/8"
2' - 4 1/8"
2"3' - 5 3/4"
8 A-711
• METAL ROOFING
• ROOF UNDERLAYMENT
• ROOF SHEATHING
GUTTER

STRUCT COL, SSD

TAPERED CHANNEL (TYP), SSD

ANGLE SUPPORT, SSD
Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
8' - 6"
Level 3
10' - 8"
3 7
A-711
Level 1
0' - 0"
Level 2
8' - 6"
Level 3
10' - 8"
12 8'1' 0 2' 4'
Anil Verma Associates, Inc.
1-800
Service Alert
Underground
227-2600
U GID
F
E
OR
B L
E
ACL
OY

TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG
Call: TOLL FREE
Use of the plans and specifications
contained herein shall be restricted to the
original site for which they were prepared;
publication thereof is expressly limited to
such use. Reproduction, publication, or
reuse by any method, in whole or in part,
without the express written consent of Anil
Verma Assoc. is prohibited. Title to said
plans remains the sole property of Anil
Verma Assoc.; visual contact shall constitute
acceptance of these restrictions.
444 SOUTH FLOWER STREET, SUITE 1688, LOS ANGELES CA. 90071 PH: (213) 624-6908, Fax: (213) 624-1188, www.anilverma.com 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 KJ

IHGFEDCBA JIHGFEDCBA

REVISIONREMARKSDATE
2 C
1 B
A65% COMPLETE SUBMITTAL11/18/2021
2019-GTD

DRAWING CONTENTS

ISSUE DATE

ISSUED AS
SCALE

JOB NUMBER

GOLETA TRAIN DEPOT

CITY OF GOLETA
130 CREMONA DRIVE, STE B, GOLETA, CA 93117
27 SOUTH LA PATERA LANE, GOLETA, CA 93117
11/18/2021
65% DESIGN

DEVELOPMENT

PLAN CHECK
#XXXXXXXXX

SIGNATURE
DATE

RENEWAL DATE
65% 11-18-2021
ALL IDEAS, DESIGN ARRANGEMENTS AND PLANS INDICATED OR REPRESENTED BY THIS DRAWING ARE OWNED BY AND THE PROPERTY OF ANIL VERMA ASSOCIATES, INC. AND WERE CREATED EVOLVED AND DEVELOPED FOR USE ON AND IN CONNECTION WITH THE SPECIFIED PROJECT. NONE OF SUCH IDEAS ARRANGEMENTS OR PLANS SHALL BE USED BY OR DISCLOSED TO ANY PERSON FIRM OR CORPORATION FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ANIL VERMA ASSOCIATES, INC.

SEAL
1/4" = 1'-0"TRASH ENCLOSURE
A-711
1/4" = 1'-0" A-711
TRASH ENCLOSURE - FLOOR PLAN 1
1/4" = 1'-0" A-711
TRASH ENCLOSURE - ROOF PLAN 2
1/4" = 1'-0" A-711
TRASH ENCLOSURE - SOUTH ELEVATION 3
1/4" = 1'-0" A-711
TRASH ENCLOSURE - WEST ELEVATION 4
1/4" = 1'-0" A-711
TRASH ENCLOSURE - NORTH ELEVATION 5
1/4" = 1'-0" A-711
TRASH ENCLOSURE - EAST ELEVATION 6
1/4" = 1'-0" A-711
TRASH ENCLOSURE - TRANSVERSE SECTION 7
1/4" = 1'-0" A-711

TRASH ENCLOSURE - LONGITUDINAL
SECTION 8

STEEL PLATE FASCIA
6" x 6" HMT BIRD SCREEN SUPPORT
2" x 2" ANGLE BIRD SCREEN

FRAME SUPPORT

BIRD SCREEN, TYP

TAPERED CHANNEL
(TYP), SSD
8" x 12" U CHANNEL

BEAM, SSD
SHEET 94 OF 184
68 Attachment 2, Resolution No. 22- ___, Exhibit 4
General Plan Consistency Analysis

EXHIBIT 4

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY

69 EXHIBIT 4

GOLETA TRAIN DEPOT – 27 S. LA PATERA LANE

GENERAL PLAN/COASTAL LAND USE PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS The Goleta Train Depot located at 27 S. La Patera Lane is consistent with all applicable provisions of the Goleta General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan.

1. Land Use Element: The Project is consistent with the Land Use Plan Map (Figure 2-1) and the zoning designation of the existing site, Office District with Business Park designation. The Project meets all applicable policies and standards of the Land Use Element. No environmentally sensitive habitat areas, as identified by the General Plan, are in or adjacent to the Project site.

The Project includes mitigation measures to avoid and/or minimize impacts to three special-status bat species and nesting birds. Additional mitigation measures are included to address cultural resources, paleontological resources, and hazardous materials. The proposed architecture is modern in design, compatible with the surrounding industrial and office uses, and together with new landscaping features will enhance the visual character of the site.

2. Open Space Element: The Project site is located south of Lake Los Carneros Park on the opposite side of U.S. 101 and approximately 1 mile from the nearest shoreline. The Project will have no impact on recreational facilities, agricultural resources, or forest resources. The City sent out AB 52 consultation letters to tribal representatives and a Cultural Resources Assessment with pedestrian field survey and records search was completed.

The assessment determined the area is sensitive for archaeological resources but concluded the existence of archaeological resources on the Project site is unlikely. No tribes requested formal consultation and no cultural resources were identified on site. However, in response to letters sent to Native American contacts during the Cultural Resources Assessment, a member of the Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians stated the Project site is in an extremely sensitive archaeological area and recommended archaeological and Native American monitoring during ground disturbing activities. Mitigation measures are included to address unanticipated discoveries of cultural resources and archaeological and Native American monitoring during ground disturbing activities. Therefore, the Project is consistent with Open Space Element polices for the preservation of natural resources and site design.

3. Conservation Element: The Project site does not include any environmentally sensitive habitat area resources. The Project site is currently developed with a large warehouse and associated parking area and truck loading area, and there is very little landscaped open space (7.3%) currently. The type of vegetation community that occurs onsite is developed lands which no longer support native vegetation. Special status wildlife species with potential to occur in the area include three species of bats as well as nesting birds. Although no 70 special-status species were observed on the Project site, mitigation measures have been included to avoid/minimize impacts to special-status bat species and nesting birds. The Project site does not include any wetlands or sensitive wildlife habitat and is not within a wildlife movement corridor. Construction and operation related greenhouse gas emissions will comply with established thresholds and the Project will indirectly reduce regional greenhouse gas emissions and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by increasing train ridership and alternative modes of transport. Project landscaping includes drought tolerant, native plants/trees, flow-through rain gardens, permeable pavers, with potential for recycled water use for irrigation. The Project will be constructed to LEED silver certification standards and includes solar installation as part of the depot roofing. Therefore, the Project is consistent with Conservation Element and polices.

4. Safety Element: The Project site is located approximately 0.6 miles from the More Ranch Fault which could result in strong ground shaking during a seismic event. To reduce potential impacts related to seismic ground shaking the Project will comply with the California Building Code seismic safety standards.

The Project site is also located approximately 0.3 miles north of the Santa Barbara Municipal Airport within Safety Zone 2, the Inner Approach/Departure Zone. The Project is consistent with the Airport Land Use Plan which allows transportation uses within Safety Zone 2. A Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment of the Project site identified the potential for hazardous materials in the existing warehouse structure and in the soil that may have resulted from past agricultural activities, past and present storage of hazardous materials, past use as a bus transportation facility, and past presence of sumps, trench drain and service shops. The Project has incorporated mitigation measures to address hazardous materials including assessment prior to site disturbance, removal, and remediation. Therefore, the Project is consistent with the Safety Element and policies.

5. Visual and Historic Resources Element: Views of the Pacific Ocean, shoreline, agricultural resources, and riparian corridors are not visible from the Project site. The Santa Ynez foothills are visible to the north of the Project site which will not be impacted by the replacement of the existing warehouse by the smaller train depot structure. The Project site is located along U.S. 101, a designated state scenic highway, and is intermittently visible from U.S. 101 but views are partially blocked by existing vegetation and topography. The Daniel Hill Adobe is a local significant historic resource located just south of the Project site; however, it is not visible from U.S. 101 and visibility will not be impacted by the Project. The Project will improve the visual character of the site by replacing the existing warehouse with a smaller, modern depot structure with new landscaping. Therefore, the Project is consistent with Visual and Historic Resources Element and policies.

6. Transportation Element: Development of the new transit facility will enhance train service and support transportation connections to Santa Barbara Airport.

The Project is expected to generate a total of 202 daily new trips and 36 AM peak hour and 36 PM peak hour trips which does not exceed any thresholds 71 for nearby intersections. VMT may increase compared to existing conditions, however any increase will be offset by the reduction of regional VMT through increased train ridership, an estimated decrease of 5.8 million VMT. The Project will replace existing sidewalks and driveways near the Project site and insert a new crosswalk near the terminus of South La Patera Lane. A portion of South La Patera Lane will be reconfigured at the terminus of the road to accommodate turnaround for large vehicles, buses, and trucks. Therefore, the project is consistent with the Transportation Element and its policies and standards

7. Public Facilities Element: The new train depot will serve existing residents within the city and throughout California and will not generate an increase in demand for parks or other public facilities. The Project site has existing connections to utilities including water, wastewater, stormwater, electric, gas, and telecommunication facilities. While water demand will increase from the current low demand uses, the water demands of the Project will not exceed the existing water credits provided for the site from the Goleta Water District.

Additionally, irrigation water can be supplied by water trucks through the GWD Recycled Water Hauling Program. Therefore, the Project is consistent with the Public Facilities Element and policies.

8. Noise Element: During the construction phase of the Project, construction will be limited to the allowed hours and noise levels and ground borne vibration will remain below the required thresholds. Noise increases from stationary sources and traffic will be less than significant. The primary stationary noise source evaluated, mechanical equipment associated with the HVAC system, will comply with noise level standards. The HVAC units will be positioned on the building’s roof top with parapets and roofs that block line-of-sight and provide noise reduction. Therefore, the Project is consistent with the Noise Element, policies, and standards.

9. Housing Element: The Project serves existing residents of the City and residents throughout California and will not result in direct or indirect population growth. Therefore, the Project has no impact on housing and is consistent with the Housing Element and policies.

72 Attachment 2, Resolution No. 22- ___, Exhibit 5
Zoning Consistency Analysis

EXHIBIT 5

ZONING CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS

73 EXHIBIT 5

ZONING CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
The Goleta Train Depot located at 27 S. La Patera Lane is consistent with all applicable provisions of the Goleta Zoning Ordinance (Title 17 of the Goleta Municipal Code) with the approval of certain setback and height deviations:

1. Zoning District. The Project is consistent with the BP Business Park zoning district which allows Transportation Passenger Terminals. The Zoning Ordinance outlines transportation uses, including passenger terminals and accessory uses incidental to the primary use, as allowed uses in the Office District with Business Park designation. The Project does not require a zoning change and is compatible with nearby land uses, which include the Goleta Rail Station, Union Pacific Railroad, and U.S. 101 to the north, light industrial and warehouse facilities to the east and west, and office and business park uses to the south.

2. Exempt Development. Pursuant to section 17.53.020 Exempt Development of the Goleta Zoning Code, Subsection X, City Projects in the Inland Area, including Capital Improvement Program projects, are exempt from Zoning Permits and Discretionary Approvals unless located in an ESHA. The Project Site is located in the Inland Area, is not in the Coastal Zone and is not located in an ESHA and is therefore exempt.

3. Development Standards. The Project site is adequate in size, shape, location, and physical characteristics to accommodate the density and intensity of the proposed Project and with the approval of proposed deviations to the setbacks and building height as set forth in Section 5 of the FEIR Resolution, is consistent with the following development standards:
74 Development
Standard
Requirement Proposed
Front Setback

Side/Rear

50 feet

10 feet
Zero foot setback for placement of minor
accessory structures including information
kiosks and bus shelter; depot building has
75 foot front setback.

6 feet on south side and rear for parking
area; 7.5 feet on north side for outdoor
building arcade columns.

Distance Between
Buildings
None, except residential
to be 5 feet
Not applicable – only one building proposed;
no residences
Building Coverage 35% 13.6% proposed
Height Limit 35 feet 35’-38’ for 5% of roof area along the peak Parking No requirement specified.

Determined by the Review
Authority.
111 spaces provided
Landscaping 30% 30.6% landscaping is proposed

75