Continued Public Hearing on the proposed Historic Preservation and Archaeological and Tribal Cultural Ordinance; Case Number 16-092 OA; City Wide (LARGER SIZED FILE) — Goleta City Council, April 5, 2022 (part 4 of 4)

*Resource Name or #: 5728 Aguila Ave
B1. Historic Name: B2. Common Name:

B3. Original Use: Single family property B4. Present Use: Single family property *B5. Architectural Style: Craftsman
*B6. Construction History:
*B7. Moved No Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features B9a. Architect: b. Builder:

B10. Significance: Late 19th/Early 20th Century Development (1866‐1918): The Development of Two Towns (1869‐1918) ; Architecture & Design: Craftsman
Area Goleta
Period of Significance1918 Property Type: Single family property Applicable Criteria Local Criterion 2(a); Local Criterion 2(c) 5728 Aguila Avenue was constructed in 1918 as a Craftsman style single‐family residence. The property appears eligible for designation as a City of Goleta Landmark under local Criteria 2(a) and 2(c).

Criterion 2(a)
5728 Aguila Avenue appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under local Criterion 2(a) as a rare remnant example of Goleta's early residential development in the original residential neighborhood that developed adjacent to the commercial corridor between the two towns of La Goleta and La Patera. The reside
nce predates by 10 years the subdivision and subsequent widespread devel opment of the neighborhood that surrounds it, and is an increasingly rare example of early 20th century residential development in this area of Goleta. The early 20th century was a significant era in Goleta’s development, laying the groundwork for future growth.

As the Goleta Valley shifted from cattle ranches to individual farmsteads, new farmers required goods and services. To serve their needs, two towns grew up along the County Road (present‐day Hollister Avenue). Early residential development through the first decades of the 20th century was largely localized around the historic town of La Patera, northeast of the intersection of Fairview and Hollister Avenues. in 1927, Santa Barbara real estate agent Robert E. Smith and Goleta landowner Frank Dow laid out a tract north of Hollister Avenue, extending from Fairview Avenue to Nectarine Ave
nue, with three north/south streets (Orange, Magnolia, and Nectarine, matching the names of those streets laid out south of Hollister in 1887) and one east/ west street (Mandarin). The same year, the
adjacent property to the east was platted, with one north/south street (Tecolote) and three east/west streets (Gato, Aguila, and Armitos). The owners were listed as the Los Angeles First National Trust & Savings Bank, Margaret O’Brien, and Katie Kelley. Residences constructed in this subdivision during this period we
re scattered. Those that remain are characterized by simple, rectangular, one‐ and two‐story massing, wood clapboard or textured cement plaster exterior wall cladding,
and gabled roofs.

Criterion 2(c)
5728
Aguila Avenue also appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under local Criterion 2(c) as a rare local example of a Craftsman bungalow. There are relatively few intact examples of Craftsman style residential architecture in Goleta from this period. The residence exhibits quality of design and distinctive features including the wood clapboard siding;
projecting partial‐width front porch with square columns; and wood sash double‐hung windows with wide, plain surrounds.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
*B12. References
Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement, February 2019.

City of Goleta Building Permits.

Goleta City Directories.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.

B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Christine Lazzaretto; Molly Iker‐Johnson; Robby Aranguren *Date of Evaluation: March 2021
714
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial

Page 3 of 3 ends

*Recorded by: Historic Resou rces Group *Date: March 2021  Continuation □ Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
Significance Statement (continued):

The Craftsman bungalow dates from the early 1900s through the 1920s. Craftsman bungalows generally have rectangular or irregular plans, and are one to one‐and‐a‐half stories tall. They have wood clapboard or shingle exteriors and a pronounced horizontal emphasis, with broad front porches, often composed with stone, clinker brick, or plastered porch piers. Other character‐defining features include low‐pitched front‐facing gable roofs, and overhanging eaves with exposed rafter tails.
715
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 5S3
Other Listings

Page 1 of 2 ends

P1. Other Identifier
*a. County Santa Barbara County
*P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as Necessary.) *b USGS 7.5' Quad Goleta Date 2018 T 4N ; R 28W ; of of Sec B. M. c.Address 550 Cambridge Dr City Goleta Zip 93117
Zone 11Sd. UTM: , 240931.559 mE/ 3815454.313 mN APN: 069‐560‐030e. Other Locational Data:
*P3a. Description
Character‐defining Features
■ One‐story configuration
Alterations
Addition to primary façade; Addition to
rear/side façade; Clerestory windows at apex
of roof removedIntegrity
Retains integrity of location, design, setting,
materials, workmanship, feeling, and
association.
■ Simple geometric forms
■ Expressed post‐and‐beam construction, in steel
■ A‐frame roof with composition shingles and wide overhanging eaves; exposed rafter tails ■ Unadorned wall surfaces; glass, plaster, and brick used as exterior wall panels and accent materials ■ Partial‐width, flat roof entry vestibule projects from primary façade ■ Fully‐glazed storefront doors with metal frame sidelights and transom ■ Flush‐mounted metal frame fixed windows forming exterior wall of primary façade; some panes stained ■No exterior decorative detailing
P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structure, and objects.) *P3b. Resource Attributes:

HP16. Religious building
*P4. Resources Present ■ Building
*P5b. Description of Photo
Historic Resources Group, 2020
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source
1963, Historic photograph
*P7. Owner and Address
*P8. Recorded by:

Historic Resources Group
12 S Fair Oaks Ave, Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
*P9. Date Recorded March 2021
*P10. Survey Type Intensive
*P11. Report Citation:Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement and Survey Report, February 2019. *Attachments: ■Building, Structure, and Object Record
Additional Features
Surface parking area paved in asphaltic
concrete
716
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

Page 2 of 2 ends

*Resource Name or #: 550 Cambridge Dr
B1. Historic Name:University Baptist Church; First Baptist Church of Goleta Valley B2. Common Name: Cambridge Community Church B3. Original Use: Institutional B4. Present Use: Institutional *B5. Architectural Style: Mid‐century Modern
*B6. Construction History:
1962: Application for Conditional Use Permit (Kenneth C. Kruger for University Baptist Church); 1995: remodel sanctuary building to add narthex, sacristy, bathroom, storage and modify pulpit area (Donald G. Sharpe, AIA)
*B7. Moved No Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features B9a. Architect: Kruger‐Bensen, AIA, Architects b. Builder:

B10. Significance: Architecture and Design: Mid‐century Modern; : Area Goleta Period of Significance1963 Property Type: Institutional Applicable Criteria Local Criterion 2(c); This evaluation is for the church building on the property; the single‐family residence, constructed in 1883, is evaluated separately. The church building appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under local Criterion 2(c).

Criterion 2(c)
Cambridge Community Church appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under local Criterion 2(c) as an excellent example of Mid‐century Modern ecclesias
tical architecture in Goleta. Cambridge Community Church was designed in the Mid‐century Modern style by Kruger‐Bensen, AIA, Architects, in 1963. It exhibits quality of design and distinctive features including the A‐frame roof with overhanging eaves and exposed rafter tails; glass, plaster, and brick exterior wall panels and accents;
and expressed steel post‐and‐beam construction.

In the two decades after World War II, Goleta was transformed with new commercial and institutional buildings and several large housing tracts. This led to an expansion of Mid‐ce
ntury Modern ecclesiastical architecture in Goleta. In the 1950s and early 1960s, many religious institutions in Goleta constructed new sanctuaries, including Goleta area Baptists, who built a new sanctuary in 1963 (550 Cambridge Drive).

The roots of the Mid‐century Modern style can be traced to early Modernists like Richard Neutra and Rudolph Schindler, whose local work inspired “second generation” Modern architects like Gregory Ain, Craig Ellwood, Harwell Hamilton Harris, Pierre Koenig, Raphael Soriano, and many more. The style gained popularity because its use of standardized, prefabricated materials permitted quick and economical construction. It became the predominant architectural style in the postwar years and is represented in almost every property type, from single‐family residences to gas stations.

Kruger‐Bensen, AIA, Architects, was formed in 19 60 in Santa Barbara. The firm designed numerous commercial and institutional buildings in a variety of styles in Santa Barbara and Vent
ura Counties, including the County Bank Headquarters Building in Santa Barbara (1967), the Theater for the U.S. Naval Battalion Center in Port Hueneme (1968), and Westminster Presbyterian Church in Port Hueneme (1970).

B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
*B12. References
Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement, February 2019.

City of Goleta Building Permits.

Goleta City Directories.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.

B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Christine Lazzaretto; Molly Iker‐Johnson; Robby Aranguren *Date of Evaluation: March 2021
717
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 5S3
Other Listings

Page 1 of 2 ends

P1. Other Identifier
*a. County Santa Barbara County
*P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as Necessary.) *b USGS 7.5' Quad Goleta Date 2018 T 4N ; R 28W ; of of Sec B. M. c.Address 175 Chapel St City Goleta Zip 93111
Zone 11Sd. UTM: , 241745.957 mE/ 3814049.570 mN APN: 071‐101‐013e. Other Locational Data:
*P3a. Description
Character‐defining Features
■ One‐story height
Alterations
Addition to rear/side façade; Porch altered
or enclosed
Integrity
Retains integrity of location, design, setting,
materials, workmanship, feeling, and
association.
■ Rectangular plan and simple massing
■
■
Hipped roof with prominent front‐facing dormer and boxed eaves with cornice ■
Horizontal wood siding
■
Partial‐width porch with Classical columns
■
Double‐hung wood‐sash windows
Simple window and door surrounds
P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structure, and objects.) *P3b. Resource Attributes:

HP2. Single family property
*P4. Resources Present ■ Building
*P5b. Description of Photo
Historic Resources Group, 2020
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source
c. 1915, Visual assessment; historic aerial photographs *P7. Owner and Address
*P8. Recorded by:

Historic Resources Group
12 S Fair Oaks Ave, Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
*P9. Date Recorded March 2021
*P10. Survey Type Intensive
*P11. Report Citation:Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement and Survey Report, February 2019. *Attachments: ■Building, Structure, and Object Record
Additional Features
Detached garage at rear of parcel
718
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

Page 2 of 2 ends

*Resource Name or #: 175 Chapel St
B1. Historic Name: B2. Common Name:

B3. Original Use: Single family property B4. Present Use: Single family property *B5. Architectural Style: Neoclassical Cottage
*B6. Construction History:
2005: Reroof
*B7. Moved No Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features B9a. Architect: b. Builder:

B10. Significance: Late 19th/Early 20th Century Development (1866‐1918): The Development of Two Towns (1869‐1918); Architecture & Design: Neoclassical Cottage
Area Goleta
Period of Significancec. 1915 Property Type: Single family property Applicable Criteria Local Criterion 2(a); Local Criterion 2(c) The residence at 175 Chapel Street appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under local Criteria 2(a) and 2(c).

Criterion 2(a)
The res
idence at 175 Chapel Street appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under local Criterion 2(a) as an increasingly rare remnant example of Goleta's early residential development. The early 20th century was a significant era in Goleta’s development, laying the groundwork for future growth. This property represents a remnant example of the original residential neighborhood that developed adjacent to the commercial corridor between the two towns of La Goleta and La Patera.

Criterion 2(c)
The residence at 175 Chapel Street also appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under local Criterion 2(c) as a good and rare local example of a Neoclassical Cottage. It exhibits quality of design and distinctive features, including its hipped roof with prominent front facing dormer and boxed eaves with cornice, horizontal wood siding, and partial‐width porch with Classical columns.

One‐story, hipped roof or Neoclassical cottages are modest one‐story houses or cottages with simplified forms and hipped roofs with minimal decorative features.

Neoclassical cottages usually have hipped roofs with prominent central dormers. The portico featured on grander Neoclassical buildings is here reduced to a simple porch that may be either full‐ or partial‐width, included under the main roof or with a separate flat or shed roof supported on classical columns.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
*B12. References
Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement, February 2019.

City of Goleta Building Permits.

Goleta City Directories.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.

B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Christine Lazzaretto; Molly Iker‐Johnson; Robby Aranguren *Date of Evaluation: March 2021
719
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 5S3
Other Listings

Page 1 of 2 ends

P1. Other Identifier
*a. County Santa Barbara County
*P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as Necessary.) *b USGS 7.5' Quad Goleta Date 2018 T 4N ; R 28W ; of of Sec B. M. c.Address 75 Coromar Dr City Goleta Zip 93117
Zone 11Sd. UTM: , 236744.792 mE/ 3813698.913 mN APN: 073‐150‐014e. Other Locational Data:
*P3a. Description
Character‐defining Features
■ One‐story configuration
Alterations
Addition to rear/side façade
Integrity
Retains integrity of location, design, setting,
materials, workmanship, feeling, and
association.
■ Horizontal massing
■
■
Flat roof with wide overhanging eaves and cantilevered canopies ■
Unadorned wall surfaces; plaster exterior wall panels with stone and breeze block accent materials ■
Entry vestibule projecting from east façade, clad in stone with breeze block screen wall ■
Pair of fully‐glazed metal frame doors with transom
■
Flush‐mounted metal frame fixed and casement windows
Little exterior decorative detailing
P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structure, and objects.) *P3b. Resource Attributes:

HP8. Industrial building
*P4. Resources Present ■ Building
*P5b. Description of Photo
Historic Resources Group, 2020
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source
1957, Santa Barbara News‐Press
*P7. Owner and Address
*P8. Recorded by:

Historic Resources Group
12 S Fair Oaks Ave, Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
*P9. Date Recorded March 2021
*P10. Survey Type Intensive
*P11. Report Citation:Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement and Survey Report, February 2019. *Attachments: ■Building, Structure, and Object Record
Additional Features
Surface parking areas paved in asphaltic
concrete surround the building
720
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

Page 2 of 2 ends

*Resource Name or #: 75 Coromar Dr
B1. Historic Name:Raytheon; Santa Barbara Research Center B2. Common Name: Raytheon B3. Original Use: Industrial B4. Present Use: Industrial *B5. Architectural Style: Mid‐century Modern
*B6. Construction History:
*B7. Moved No Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features B9a. Architect: Howell, Arendt, Mosher & Grant b. Builder: Haas‐Haynie‐Frandsen, Inc.

B10. Significance: Post‐World War II Development (1946‐1969): Aerospace Industry; Architecture & Design: Mid‐century Modern Area Goleta Period of Significance1957 Property Type: Industrial Applicable Criteria Local Criterion 2(a); Local Criterion 2(c) This evaluation is for the two buildings at the east side of the Raytheon campus. Collectively, these buildings appear eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under Local Criteria 2(a) and 2(c).

Criterion 2(a)
The two buildings at the east side of the Raytheon campus collectivel y appear eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under local Criterion 2(a) as an example of industrial development associated with the aerospace industry from the post‐World War II period. The buildings have a strong association with the aerospace industry, which quickly became Goleta’s dominant industry in the postwar period. Raytheon made sig nificant contributions to the aerospace industry and influenced the postwar developme
nt of Goleta.

The aerospace industry became a significant factor in Goleta starting in the mid‐1950s, with Aerophysics, Raytheon, and Hughes each establishing a presence in the city.

The space needed to house both the industries and their employees radically transformed Goleta’s landscape. Former walnut and lemon orchards gave way to industrial development and dozens of new, single‐family residential subdivisions.

Raytheon Company was founded as the American Appliance Company in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 1922. The original intent for the business was to develop a new method for noiseless home refrigeration; however, the company soon shifted focus to vacuum tubes and other electronic devices. In 1924, after noting the rapidly growing consumer demand for radios in the United States, the company purchased patents for the S‐tube, a gas‐filled rectifier that converted alternating current (AC) used in house
holds to the direct current (DC) used in radio sets. In 1925, shortly before the company began to produce S‐tubes, a firm in Indiana claimed the American Appliance company name. As a result, the company changed its name to Raytheon Manufacturing Company. By 1926, Raytheon was a major manufacture r of tube rectifiers.

However,
the following year, the company was effectively shut out of the market by RCA, and turned to the production of radio‐rece iving tubes.

Soon thereafter, Raytheon began to diversify, acquiring Acme‐Delta Company, a producer of transformers, power equipment, and electronic auto parts. When the United States entered World War II, Raythe
on was chosen to develop the British magnetron, a top secret microwave radar power tube, which provided the range and imagery required to detect and destroy enemy planes, submarines, and warships, a significant contribution to the Allied Forces' efforts in World War II. After the war, the company established a plant in Gole
ta, following the lead of a number of other defense companies. Raytheon continued to work on defense contracts through the middle of the 20th century before diversifying in the 1960s and 1970s, acquiring Packard‐Bell's computer operations, a number of electronics firms, and a commercial refrigeration company.

The company continues to produce electronics both for commercial and defense purposes.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
*B12. References
Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement, February 2019.

City of Goleta Building Permits.

Goleta City Directories.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.

B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Christine Lazzaretto; Molly Iker‐Johnson; Robby Aranguren *Date of Evaluation: March 2021
721
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial

Page 3 of 3 ends

*Recorded by: Historic Resources Group *Date: March 2021 ◼ Continuation □ Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
Significance Statement (continued):

Criterion 2(c)
The buildings also appear eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under local Criterion 2(c) as good local examples of Mid-century Modern industrial architecture by Howell, Arendt, Mosher & Grant. They exhibit quality of design and distinctive features including the flat roof with wide overhanging eaves and cantilevered canopies, plaster exterior wall panels with stone and breeze block accent materials, and entry vestibule projecting from east façade clad in stone with breeze block screen wall.

The roots of the Mid-century Modern style can be traced to early Modernists like Richard Neutra and Rudolph Schindler, whose local work inspired “second generation” Modern architects like Gregory Ain, Craig Ellwood, Harwell Hamilton Harris, Pierre Koenig, Raphael Soriano, and many more. The style gained popularity because its use of standardized, prefabricated materials permitted quick and economical construction. It became the predominant architectural style in the postwar years and is represented in almost every property type, from single-family residences to gas stations.

The architectural firm of Howell, Arendt, Mosher and Grant consisted of Henry W. Howell, Wallace William Arendt, Glen Gaylord Mosher, and Robert Grant. The firm was initially founded in 1946 by Henry Howell (1889-1962) and Wallace Arendt (1917-1975). Glen Gaylor Mosher (1914-1989) joined the firm in 1956 to handle the financial concerns of the firm. Robert Grant (b. 1928) joined the firm shortly thereafter. Henry Howell retired in 1959, after which the firm reorganized as Arend, Mosher & Grant until 1975. Following Arendt’s death in 1975, the successor firm became Peterson, Phillips, Mosher and Grant. Known works include Jordanos Market (1950); the Schmode residence (1952); Washington Elementary School (1953); Santa Barbara County Office Building (1954); La Cumbre Junior High School (1954); and Pierce Medical Building (1955), and institutional work for a number of school districts in Goleta, Paso Robles, and Atascadero.

Additional Photo(s):

Historic Photo(s):
1958, Goleta Valley Historical Society archives
722
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 5S3
Other Listings

Page 1 of 2 ends

P1. Other Identifier
*a. County Santa Barbara County
*P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as Necessary.) *b USGS 7.5' Quad Goleta Date 2018 T 4N ; R 28W ; of of Sec B. M. c.Address 6595 Covington Way City Goleta Zip 93117
Zone 11Sd. UTM: , 237824.162 mE/ 3815063.563 mN APN: 077‐160‐022e. Other Locational Data:
*P3a. Description
Character‐defining Features
■ One‐story configuration
Alterations
No major alterations
Integrity
Retains integrity of location, design, setting,
materials, workmanship, feeling, and
association.
■ Horizontal massing
■
■
Low‐pitched gable roof with wide overhanging eaves
■
Unadorned wall surfaces; Stucco exterior wall panels
■
Flush‐mounted metal frame fixed, casement, and awning windows; some panes stained glass Little or no exterior decorative detailing
P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structure, and objects.) *P3b. Resource Attributes:

HP16. Religious building
*P4. Resources Present ■ Building
*P5b. Description of Photo
Historic Resources Group, 2020
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source
1965, Planning file
*P7. Owner and Address
*P8. Recorded by:

Historic Resources Group
12 S Fair Oaks Ave, Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
*P9. Date Recorded March 2021
*P10. Survey Type Intensive
*P11. Report Citation:Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement and Survey Report, February 2019. *Attachments: ■Building, Structure, and Object Record
Additional Features
Surface parking area paved in asphaltic
concrete to west of church building
723
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

Page 2 of 2 ends

*Resource Name or #: 6595 Covington Way
B1. Historic Name:Christ Lutheran Church B2. Common Name: Christ Lutheran Church B3. Original Use: Institutional B4. Present Use: Institutional *B5. Architectural Style: Mid‐century Modern
*B6. Construction History:
1983: Construct storage area on south end of fellowship hall; 2000: add modular building to site near south end of fellowship hall; 2005: CUP to operate pre‐school program in modular building; 2006: add parsonage
*B7. Moved No Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features B9a. Architect: Johnson, Robert G. b. Builder:

B10. Significance: Architecture and Design: Mid‐century Modern; : Area Goleta Period of Significance1965 Property Type: Institutional Applicable Criteria Local Criterion 2(c); Christ Lutheran Church appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under local Criterion 2(c) as a good local example of Mid‐century Modern ecclesiastical architecture.

Criterion 2(c)
Christ Lutheran Church appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under local Criterion 2(c) as a good local example of Mid‐century Modern ecclesiastical architecture. It was constructed in 1965 as a Mid‐century Modern style church, designed by Robert G. Johnson, AIA. The church exhibits quality of design and distinctive features, including the low‐pitched gable roof with wide overhanging eaves and stucco exterior wall panels.

In the tw
o decades after World War II, Goleta was transformed with new commercial and institutional buildings and several large housing tracts. This led to an expansion of Mid‐ce
ntury Modern ecclesiastical architecture in Goleta. In the 1950s and early 1960s, many religious institutions in Goleta constructed new sanctuaries.

The roots
of the Mid‐century Modern st
yle can be traced to early Modernists like Richard Neutra and Rudolph Schindler, whose local work inspired “second generation” Modern architects like Gregory Ain, Craig Ellwood, Harwell Hamilton Harris, Pierre Koenig, Raphael Soriano, and many more. The style gained popularity because its use of standardized, prefabricated materials permitted quick and economical construction. It became the predominant architectural style in the postwar years and is represented in al
most every property type, from single‐family residences to gas stations.

Robert Gilbert Johnson was born in Los Angeles in 1918. He received his Bache lor of Architecture degree from the University of Southern California in 1941 and served as a Lieutenant in the Navy during World War II. From 1952 through 1957, he was a partner in the Sherman Oaks‐based firm Benedict and Johnson, Architects, after which he formed a partnership with Henry Silvestri. Johnson's work was primarily institutional, focusing largely on educational projects for the Los Angeles Unified School District, Downey School D
istrict, and Harvard‐Westlake School. He retired in 1997, and died in Bradenton, Florida, in 2006.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
*B12. References
Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement, February 2019.

City of Goleta Building Permits.

Goleta City Directories.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.

B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Christine Lazzaretto; Molly Iker‐Johnson; Robby Aranguren *Date of Evaluation: March 2021
724
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 5S3
Other Listings General Plan List

Page 1 ends

HP33. Farm/ranch
*P4. Resources Present ■ Building, Site
*P5b. Description of Photo
Historic Resources Group, 2020
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source
c. 1895, Architectural Historical Survey of Vernacular Homestead *P7. Owner and Address
*P8. Recorded by:

Historic Resources Group
12 S Fair Oaks Ave, Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
*P9. Date Recorded March 2021
*P10. Survey Type Intensive
*P11. Report Citation:Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement and Survey Report, February 2019. *Attachments: ■Building, Structure, and Object Record
Additional Features
Numerous outbuildings; agricultural fields
725
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

Page 2 ends

*Resource Name or #: 598 N Fairview Ave
B1. Historic Name: B2. Common Name: Fairview Gardens
B3. Original Use: Industrial B4. Present Use: Industrial *B5. Architectural Style: Residential Vernacular
*B6. Construction History:
*B7. Moved No Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features B9a. Architect: b. Builder:

B10. Significance:Late 19th/Early 20th Century Development (1866‐1918): Agricultural Development (1866‐1918) Area Goleta Period of Significancec. 1895 Property Type: Industrial Applicable Criteria Local Criterion 2(a) This evaluation is for the farmhouse on the Fairview Gardens property. It appears eligible under for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under local Criterion 2(a).

According to the Architectural Historic al Survey of Vernacular Homesteads in the Goleta Valley, completed in 1986, the c. 1895 farmhouse on the property is one of the last two story, c. 1890s farmhouses with site integrity. 12 of 40 acres historically associated with the property remain associated with the farmhouse. That survey did not formally evaluate properties for potential eligibility for historic designation, and no California Historical Resources Status Codes were assigned. This property was included on the General Plan List.

Criterion 2(a)
The farmhouse at Fairview Gardens appears eligible for listing as a Goleta Historic Landmark under local Criterion 2(a) as a rare remnant example of 19th century residential development associated with Goleta’s agricultural history. It was constructed in approximately 1895, during an early period of development in Goleta, and is one of only a few remaining properties dating to the late 19th century.

Farmers and homesteaders from the eastern and mid-western United States moved into the former La Goleta rancho between the 1860s and 1880s. During the 1870s, the character of the Goleta area began to shift from sparsely populated cattle ranches to farmsteads and towns. The ne w farmers required goods and services such as farm
machinery, wagons and buggies, blacksmithing, and general supplies. To serve their needs, two towns grew up along the County Road (present‐day Hollister Avenue), the main r
oad linking the isolated farms with Santa Barbara, More’s Landing, and points north. La Patera, named for the gathering of ducks in the adjacent marshy slough, was located at the corner of Fairview and Hollister Avenues, and was established in 1869. La Goleta, located on the north side of Hollister Avenue at Patterson Avenue, was situate
d on the southwestern portion of the La Goleta land grant. It too was founded in 1869. Between 1870 and 1890, the population of the Goleta Valley increased from 200 to 700 people. The two towns continued to serve the farming community as separate entities for approximately 60 years. Though the Valley’s population grew steadily, the towns themselves saw little development.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
*B12. References
Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement, February 2019.

City of Goleta Building Permits.

Goleta City Directories.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.

B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Christine Lazzaretto; Molly Iker‐Johnson; Robby Aranguren *Date of Evaluation: March 2021
726
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trino mial

Page 3 of 3 ends

*Recorded by: Historic Resources Group *Date: November 2020  Continuation □ Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
Additional Photo(s):
727
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 5S3
Other Listings General Plan List

Page 1 of 2 ends

P1. Other Identifier
*a. County Santa Barbara County
*P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as Necessary.) *b USGS 7.5' Quad Goleta Date 2018 T 4N ; R 28W ; of of Sec B. M. c.Address 5444 Hollister Ave City Goleta Zip 93111
Zone 11Sd. UTM: , 241361.408 mE/ 3814060.920 mN APN: 071‐330‐003e. Other Locational Data:
*P3a. Description
Character‐defining Features
■ Two‐story configuration
Alterations
Some windows may be replaced
Integrity
Retains integrity of location, design, setting,
materials, workmanship, feeling, and
association.
■ Horizontal massing
■
■
Low‐pitched gable roof with wide overhanging eaves
■
Unadorned wall surfaces; Plaster and brick used as exterior wall panels an d accent materials ■
Entry vestibule at southwest corner
■
Pairs of fully‐glazed metal frame doors with metal frame sidelights an d transoms ■
Flush‐mounted metal frame fixed windows; divided‐light metal frame fixe d and hopper windows Little or no exterior decorative detailing
P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structure, and objects.) *P3b. Resource Attributes:

HP16. Religious building
*P4. Resources Present ■ Building
*P5b. Description of Photo
Historic Resources Group, 2020
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source
1961, Los Angeles Times, 1960
*P7. Owner and Address
*P8. Recorded by:

Historic Resources Group
12 S Fair Oaks Ave, Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
*P9. Date Recorded March 2021
*P10. Survey Type Intensive
*P11. Report Citation:Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement and Survey Report, February 2019. *Attachments: ■Building, Structure, and Object Record
Additional Features
Surface parking lots paved in asphaltic
concrete; several other buildings on campus
728
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

Page 2 of 2 ends

*Resource Name or #: 5444 Hollister Ave
B2. Common Name: St. Raphael's Catholic ChurchB1. Historic Name:St. Raphael's Catholic Church B3. Original Use: Institutional B4. Present Use: Institutional *B5. Architectural Style: Mid‐century Modern
*B6. Construction History:
1973: Add storage room to assembly hall; 1979: new multi‐purpose building between church and classroom building; 1991: Interior remodel (PMN Associates) *B7. Moved No Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features Area Goleta
B9a. Architect: Garcia architects (1979 building); PMN Associate b. Builder:

B10. Significance: Architecture and Design: Mid‐century Modern Per
iod of Significance1961 Property Type: Institutional Applicable Criteria Local Criterion 2(c) This evaluation is for the church and classroom buildings on the property. St. Raphael's Catholic Church was constructed in 1961. Collectively, these two buildings appear eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under local Criterion 2(c). This property was included on the General Plan List.

Criterion 2(c)
The church and classroom buildings on the St. Raphael's Catholic Church campus collectively appear eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under Criterion 2(c) as good local examples of Mid‐century Modern ecclesiastical architecture. They exhibit quality of design and distinctive features, including the church building's low‐ pitched gable roof with wide overhanging eaves; the classroom building's flat roof; and both buildings' pl aster and brick exterior wall panels and accents.

In the two decades after World War II, Goleta was transformed with new commercial and institutional buildings and several large housing tracts. This led to an expansion of Mid‐century Modern eccl
esiastical architecture in Goleta. In the 1950s and early 1960s, many religious institutions in Goleta constructed new sanctuaries.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
*B12. References
Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement, February 2019.

City of Goleta Building Permits.

Goleta City Directories.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.

B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Christine Lazzaretto; Molly Iker‐Johnson; Robby Aranguren *Date of Evaluation: March 2021
729
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 5S3
Other Listings General Plan List

Page 1 ends

P1. Other Identifier
*a. County Santa Barbara County
*P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as Necessary.) *b USGS 7.5' Quad Goleta Date 2018 T 4N ; R 28W ; of of Sec B. M. c.Address 5555 Hollister Ave City Goleta Zip 93117
Zone 11Sd. UTM: , 240906.702 mE/ 3814030.386 mN APN: 071‐140‐056e. Other Locational Data:
*P3a. Description
Character‐defining Features
■ One‐story height
Alterations
Windows replaced ‐ some; fabric awnings
added
Integrity
Retains integrity of location, design, setting,
materials, workmanship, feeling, and
association.
■ Rectangular plan
■
■
Expressive roofline with exposed rafters
■
Large expanses of plate glass; cement plaster exterior wall cladding ■
■
Pair of fully‐glazed metal frame doors with metal frame sidelights and transom Flush mounted metal frame fixed windows
Abstract shapes
P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structure, and objects.) *P3b. Resource Attributes:

HP6. 1‐3 story commercial building
*P4. Resources Present ■ Building
*P5b. Description of Photo
Historic Resources Group, 2020
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source
1967, Permit
*P7. Owner and Address
*P8. Recorded by:

Historic Resources Group
12 S Fair Oaks Ave, Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
*P9. Date Recorded March 2021
*P10. Survey Type Intensive
*P11. Report Citation:Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement and Survey Report, February 2019. *Attachments: ■Building, Structure, and Object Record
Additional Features
Surface parking area paved in asphaltic
concrete; the Witness Tree, a 250‐year old
California sycamore, is located in the patio
■ Low stone planters at west (primary) and north facades 730
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

Page 2 ends

*Resource Name or #: 5555 Hollister Ave
B1. Historic Name:Hill Homestead Witness Tree; Blue Ox Steak House B2. Common Name: Butler Event Center; Sizzler Steak House B3. Original Use: Commercial B4. Present Use: Commercial *B5. Architectural Style: Googie
*B6. Construction History:
1966: Restaurant; 1967: 80 sq. ft. pole sign; 1972: add retail store (Louis Mazzetti); 1976: Patio improvements (Blue Ox; Lenvik & Minor, architects); 1980: add theater to Bottini commercial building (Lenvik & Minor); 1984: Landscape plan, Sizzler; 1998: Freestanding sign, Sizzler; 1998: reroof *B7. Moved No Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features B9a. Architect: Mazzetti, Louis b. Builder:

B10. Significance: Post‐World War II Development (1946‐1969) : Post‐World War II Commercial Development; Architecture & Design:

Googie
Area Goleta
Period of Significance1967 Property Type: Commercial Applicable Criteria Local Criterion 2(a); Local Criterion 2(c) The Bishop Event Center (formerly Blue Ox Steakhouse) appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under local Criteria 2(a) and 2(c). It was included on the General Plan List and is located within the Old Town Heritage Overlay Zone.

Criterion 2(a)
The Bishop Event Center appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under local Criterion 2(a) as a good local example of post‐World War II commercial development, representing the increased commercial development along Hollister Avenue associated with significant local growth in the postwar period.

There
was limited commercial growth in Goleta in the years immediately following World War II, as the construction of the Highway 101 bypass in 1947 drew commercial traffic away from downtown Goleta. The commercial district established in the prewar period along Hollister Avenue between Patterson and Fairview Avenues continued to be the ma
in commercial thoroughfare after the war, and commercial activity along Hollister and Fairview Avenues grew starting in the 1950s. By 1967, the Goleta Valley had 30 restaurants and three bakeries, four department stores, eight grocery stores, 21 service stations, a mortuary, four pharmacies, and dozens of construction‐related businesses.

Crite
rion 2(c)
The Bishop Event Center also appears eligible under local Criterion 2(c) as a good and rare local example of Googie architecture by architect Louis Mazzetti. It exhibits quality of desig
n and distinctive features including the large expanses of plate glass, cement plaster exterior wall cladding, and expressive roofline with exposed rafters.

The Blue Ox Steak House was designed in the Googie style by architect Louis Mazzetti in 19 67, and was built around the Witness Tree. Googie has been described as Modernism for the masses. With its swooping lines and organic shapes, the style attempted to capture the playful exuberance of postwar America. Named for the John Lautner‐designed Googie’s Restaurant in Los Angeles, the style was widely employed in roadside commercial architecture of the 1950s, including coffee shops, bowling alleys, and car washes. It exaggerated the vocabulary of Mid‐century Modern design to catch the eye of passing mo torists with dramatic sculptural rooflines, shimmering walls of glass, abstract shapes, and prominent integral signage.

Louis A. Mazzetti (1915‐2001) was born in Los Angeles. He studied at the Art Center College of Design in the 1930s and worked for Lockheed Aircraft during World War II.

Prior to s
tarting his own firm, Mazzetti worked briefly for Kem Weber. Mazzetti retired in the 1980s.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
*B12. References
Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement, February 2019.

City of Goleta Building Permits.

Goleta City Directories.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.

B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Christine Lazzaretto; Molly Iker‐Johnson; Robby Aranguren *Date of Evaluation: March 2021
731
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial

Page 3 of 3 ends

*Recorded by: Historic Resources Group *Date: March 2021 ◼ Continuation □ Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
Significance Statement (continued):

The Tree Study conducted as part of the Historic Context Statement noted that the Witness Tree, a 250-year old California sycamore, is located in the patio of the Butler Event Center. It was designated as a Historical Landmark prior to the City's incorporation. The Witness Tree is actually a substitute, as the original Witness Tree was cut down in the 1800s to build Hollister Avenue. Note that trees in Goleta are regulated under the Goleta Urban Forest Management Plan, adopted June 7, 2011 and amended February 21, 2017. The documentation of trees is outside the scope of this survey.

Historic Photo(s):

Newspaper clipping, 1976, Goleta Valley Historical Society archives 732
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 3S 3CS 5S3
Other Listings General Plan List

Page 1 ends

P1. Other Identifier
*a. County Santa Barbara County
*P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as Necessary.) *b USGS 7.5' Quad Goleta Date 2018 T 4N ; R 28W ; of of Sec B. M. c.Address 5681 Hollister Ave City Goleta Zip 93117
Zone 11Sd. UTM: , 240547.824 mE/ 3813923.372 mN APN: 071‐130‐009e. Other Locational Data:
*P3a. Description
Character‐defining Features
■ One‐story height
Alterations
Additions to side/rear; windows replaced
(some); one of two central patios covered in
barrel‐vaulted roofIntegrity
Retains integrity of location, design, setting,
materials, workmanship, feeling, and
association.
■ Roughly rectangular plan with projecting wings at east and west ■ Reinforced concrete construction
■ Front‐gabled roof at central volume with bracketed eaves; hipped roof at side wings with bracketed eaves ■Exterior walls veneered in smooth plaster
■ Prominent front‐gabled entry portico with terra cotta tile steps and shed roof projection supported by Classical columns ■ Three pairs of divided‐light wood doors with divided‐light transoms ■ Wood‐sash casement and single‐hung windows with divided lights ■ Cast plaster columns; cast plaster frieze reading "GOLETA UNION SCHOOL" P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structure, and objects.) *P3b. Resource Attributes:

HP15. Educational building
*P4. Resources Present ■ Building
*P5b. Description of Photo
Historic Resources Group, 2020
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source
1926, Historic photographs
*P7. Owner and Address
*P8. Recorded by:

Historic Resources Group
12 S Fair Oaks Ave, Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
*P9. Date Recorded March 2021
*P10. Survey Type Intensive
*P11. Report Citation:Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement and Survey Report, February 2019. *Attachments: ■Building, Structure, and Object Record
Additional Features
Surface parking area paved in asphaltic
concrete; mature trees
733
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

Page 2 ends

*Resource Name or #: 5681 Hollister Ave
B1. Historic Name:Goleta Union School B2. Common Name: Goleta Valley Community Center B3. Original Use: Institutional B4. Present Use: Civic
*B5. Architectural Style: Mediterranean Revival
*B6. Construction History:
1984: rezone portion of lot from PI to C‐3 use; 1988: sign; 1989: CUP flower stand 5679 Hollister; 1995: MTD bus shelter (Eberhard architects); 1996: new playground; 1997: replace above‐ground fuel tank; 2004: Remode
l, add restrooms, TI
*B7. Moved No Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features B9a. Architect: Crawford, Louis N. b. Builder:

B10. Significance: Development Between the Wars (1919‐1940): Civic & Institutional Development (1919‐1940); Architecture & Design:

Mediterranean Revival
Area Goleta
Period of Significance1926 Property Type: Civic Applicable Criteria A/1/2(a); Local Criterion 2(c) The Goleta Union School building appears eligible for designation under Criterion A/1/2(a) and under Local Criterion 2(c). Page & Turnbull completed a Historic Resources Assessment for this property in 2016, in which they concluded that the Goleta Union School building is eligible for listing in the National and California Registers under Criterion A/1 for its role in the development of Goleta’s education system as well as in the growth of the town center; this survey concurs with that finding. The Goleta Union School (now the Goleta Valley Community Center) was included on the General Plan List and is located within the Old Town Heritage Overlay Zone.

Criterion A/1/2(a)
The Goleta Union School building appears eligible for listing in the National Register, California Register and as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under Criterion A/1/2(a) as an important example of the continued institutional growth in Goleta during the 1920s. It represents institutional development from the 1920s, as Goleta transformed from two towns and a scattered grouping of ranches and farms into a booming citrus producer and oil town.

By the early 1920s, Goleta Valley schoolhouses were struggling to accommodate the 200 students in the district. To address the situation, the former Cathedral Oaks, La Patera, and Goleta Districts combined to form the Goleta Union School District in 1925. The new district began construction of the Goleta Union School at La Patera in 1926, spurring the shift of the center of influence from La Goleta to La Patera. The new Goleta Union School building required an $85,000 bond issue to purchase a 10-acre lot situated near the business district in La Patera, and to construct the Mediterranean Revival style schoolhouse designed by Santa Maria architect Louis N. Crawford. The new schoolhouse had six classrooms, an administration office, teacher and student restrooms, special rooms for cooking and manual arts instruction, a library, kitchen, and 390-seat auditorium. The building was promoted as “earthquake resistant,” with “fireproof walls and roof.” The Goleta Union School building occupies an important place in Goleta's institutional history. It is a rare extant example of 1920s institutional development in the City of Goleta, and is the only extant early school building in the City. It represents the expansion of Goleta's school system in direct response to the rapidly expanding population in the area as Goleta transformed into a bustling citrus and oil town in the period following World War I. It retains all seven aspects of historic integrity, and therefore continues to convey its historic significance as an important example of Goleta's continued institutional growth in the 1920s.B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
*B12. References
Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement, February 2019.

City of Goleta Building Permits.

Goleta City Directories.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.

B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Christine Lazzaretto; Molly Iker‐Johnson; Robby Aranguren *Date of Evaluation: 2021
734
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial

Page 3 of 4 ends

*Recorded by: Historic Resources Group *Date: March 2021 ◼ Continuation □ Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
Signifiance Statement (continued):

Criterion 2(c)
The Goleta Union School building also appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under Local Criterion 2(c) as a good local example of Mediterranean Revival style architecture. It exhibits quality of design and distinctive features including its prominent front-gabled entry portico with terra cotta tile steps and Classical columns, front-gabled and hipped roofs with bracketed eaves, and cast plaster frieze reading "GOLETA UNION SCHOOL."
The Mediterranean Revival style is distinguished by its eclectic mix of architectural elements from several regions around the Mediterranean Sea, including Spain, Italy, southern France, and North Africa. The Mediterranean Revival style is sometimes more formal and usually more elaborately composed and ornamented than the simpler, more rustic Spanish Colonial Revival style, and often more flamboyant than the sober Italian Renaissance Revival style. Typical features of the Mediterranean Revival style include arched entrance doorways with richly detailed surrounds; arcades and loggias; stairways and terraces with cast stone balustrades; and Classical decorative elements in cast stone or plaster, including architraves, stringcourses, cornices, pilasters, columns, and quoins.

Louis Noire Crawford (1890-1946) was born in Louisville, Kentucky. Upon completing high school, he studied civil engineering at Purdue University for two years. He left Purdue and taught for four years, after which he enrolled at Illinois University, graduating with a Bachelor's degree in engineering.

Upon completion of additional course work, he became certified to practice architecture in Illinois and California. In 1915, Crawford took a position with the University of California (now UC Berkeley) during its summer session. Three years later, he joined the faculty at Santa Maria High School.

Crawford opened a private architectural practice as architect in Santa Maria in 1920. Known works include Santa Maria City Hall; the Santa Maria Gas Company annex; Santa Maria Elks Lodge No. 1538; the Knights of Phythias building; Orcutt, El Camino, Fairlawn, Goleta, Vista del Mar, Arroyo Grande, Pismo Beach, Cayucos and Morro Bay elementary schools; San Luis Obispo High and Junior High schools; and Cambria Pines high school. During his career, Crawford served as vice president of the Association of California Architects and president of the American Institute of Architects.

The Tree Study conducted as part of the Historic Context Statement identified the following mature trees on the property: jacaranda, melaleuca, deodar cedar, and Australian willow. Note that trees in Goleta are regulated under the Goleta Urban Forest Management Plan, adopted June 7, 2011 and amended February 21, 2017. The documentation of trees is outside the scope of this survey. 735
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial

Page 3 of 4 ends

*Recorded by: Historic Resources Group *Date: March 2021 ◼ Continuation □ Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
Additional Photo(s):

Historic Photo(s):

GoletaHistoric.com
736
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 5S3
Other Listings General Plan List

Page 1 of 2 ends

P1. Other Identifier
*a. County Santa Barbara County
*P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as Necessary.) *b USGS 7.5' Quad Goleta Date 2018 T 4N ; R 28W ; of of Sec B. M. c. Addres
s 5757 Hollister Ave City Goleta Zip 93117
Zone 11Sd. UTM: , 240376.831 mE/ 3814058.925 mN APN: 071‐121‐003e. Other Locational Data:
*P3a. Description
Character‐defining Features
■ One‐story height
Alterations
Relocated to site, 1939; openings enclosed;
openings added; awning added
Integrity
Retains integrity of design, setting, materials,
workmanship, feeling, and association.
■ Rectangular plan and simple massing
■
■
Barrel roof with parapet and built‐up roofing
■
Cement plaster exterior wall cladding
■
■
Pair of fully‐glazed metal frame storefront doors with sidelights and tran soms ■
Lack of fenestration or sky‐lighting
■
Architecturally notable primary façade with engaged pilasters at eas t and west ends; projecting neon sign at primary façade reads "SANTA CRUZ MARKET"
■
P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structure, and objects.) *P3b. Resource Attributes:

HP6. 1‐3 story commercial property
*P4. Resources Present ■ Building
*P5b. Description of Photo
Historic Resources Group, 2020
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source
1939, Tom Modugno
*P7. Owner and Address
*P8. Recorded by:

Historic Resources Group
12 S Fair Oaks Ave, Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
*P9. Date Recorded March 2021
*P10. Survey Type Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement and Survey Report, February 2019. *Attachments: ■Building, Structure, and Object Record
Additional Features
Surface parking lot paved in asphaltic
concrete to east of building
737
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

Page 2 of 2 ends

*Resource Name or #: 5757 Hollister Ave
B1. Historic Name:Earle Ovington plane hangar; Caterpillar Tractors B2. Common Name: Santa Cruz Market B3. Original Use: Commercial B4. Present Use: Commercial *B5. Architectural Style: Industrial Vernacular;
*B6. Construction History:
*B7. Moved No Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features B9a. Architect: b. Builder:

B10. Significance:Development Between the Wars (1919‐1940): Commercial Development (1919‐1940) Area Goleta Period of Significance1939 Property Type: Commercial Applicable Criteria Local Criterion 2(a) The building at 5757 Hollister Avenue appears eligible under Local Criterion 2(a). It was included on the General Plan List and is located within the Old Town Heritage Overlay Zone.

Local Criterion 2(a)
5757 Hollister Avenue appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under local Criterion 2(a) as a rare local example of commercial development from the 1930s, during a period of continued growth and development of the towns of La Goleta and La Patera. It is an increasingly rare representation of the continued expansion of Hollister Avenue as Goleta's primary commercial corridor during the Great Depression. Constructed in c. 1928 as an airplane hangar by Earle Ovington, the first air mail pilot in the
United States, the building was relocated to its present site from the Casa Loma Air Field in Santa Barbara (now the municipal golf course) in 1939.

The period between World War I and World War II witnessed a number of changes in the Goleta Valley’s commercial centers. At the beginning of the 1920s, the towns of La Goleta and La Patera formed Goleta’s original commercial districts, centered on Hollister and Patterson Avenues, and Hollister and Fairview Avenues, respectively.

Goleta and La Patera’s commercial districts combined to become one commercial center in 1933, when the United States Postal Service established the Goleta post office in La Patera, changing that town’s name and effectively combining the neighboring settlements.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
*B12. References
Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement, February 2019.

City of Goleta Building Permits.

Goleta City Directories.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.

B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Christine Lazzaretto; Molly Iker‐Johnson; Robby Aranguren *Date of Evaluation: March 2021
738
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 5S3
Other Listings General Plan List

Page 1 of 2 ends

P1. Other Identifier
*a. County Santa Barbara County
*P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as Necessary.) *b USGS 7.5' Quad Goleta Date 2018 T 4N ; R 28W ; of of Sec B. M. c.Address 5784 Hollister Ave City Goleta Zip 93117
Zone 11Sd. UTM: , 240320.428 mE/ 3814130.887 mN APN: 071‐061‐013e. Other Locational Data:
*P3a. Description
Character‐defining Features
■ One‐story height
Alterations
Storefront altered; awning added; security
door added
Integrity
Retains integrity of location, design, setting,
materials, workmanship, feeling, and
association.
■ Rectangular plan with symmetrical façade
■
■
Low‐pitched front gable roof with built‐up roofing; pent roof at primary façade with clay barrel tile shingles ■
Exterior walls veneered in smooth plaster
■
Pent roof forms simple arcaded entrance canopy
■
Single fully‐glazed metal frame storefront door with sidelights ■
Wood frame fixed windows with projecting subsills and divided‐light transo ms ■
■
P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structure, and objects.) *P3b. Resource Attributes:

HP6. 1‐3 story commercial property
*P4. Resources Present ■ Building
*P5b. Description of Photo
Historic Resources Group, 2020
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source
1932, Historic Resources Study: Goleta Old Town Revitalization *P7. Owner and Address
*P8. Recorded by:

Historic Resources Group
12 S Fair Oaks Ave, Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
*P9. Date Recorded March 2021
*P10. Survey Type Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement and Survey Report, February 2019. *Attachments: ■Building, Structure, and Object Record
Additional Features
739
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

Page 2 of 2 ends

*Resource Name or #: 5784 Hollister Ave
B1. Historic Name: B2. Common Name: Goleta Bakery
B3. Original Use: Commercial B4. Present Use: Commercial *B5. Architectural Style: Mediterranean Revival
*B6. Construction History:
*B7. Moved No Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features B9a. Architect: b. Builder:

B10. Significance:Development Between the Wars (1919‐1940): Commercial Development (1919‐1940) Area Goleta Period of Significance1932 Property Type: Commercial Applicable Criteria Local Criterion 2(a) 5784 Hollister Avenue appears eligible under Local Criterion 2(a). It was included on the General Plan List and is located within the Old Town Heritage Overlay Zone.

Criterion 2(a)
5784 Hollister Avenue appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under local Criterion 2(a) as a rare local example of commercial development from the 1930s, during a period of continued growth and development of the towns of La Goleta and La Patera. It is an increasingly rare representation of the continued expansion of Hollister Avenue as Goleta's primary commercial corridor during the Great Depression.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
*B12. References
Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement, February 2019.

City of Goleta Building Permits.

Goleta Ci
ty Directories.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.

B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Christine Lazzaretto; Molly Iker‐Johnson; Robby Aranguren *Date of Evaluation: March 2021
740
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 5S3
Other Listings General Plan List

Page 1 of 2 ends

P1. Other Identifier
*a. County Santa Barbara County
*P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as Necessary.) *b USGS 7.5' Quad Goleta Date 2018 T 4N ; R 28W ; of of Sec B. M. c.Address 5838 Hollister Ave City Goleta Zip 93117
Zone 11Sd. UTM: , 240189.891 mE/ 3814140.416 mN APN: 071‐053‐014e. Other Locational Data:
*P3a. Description
Character‐defining Features
■ One‐story height
Alterations
Door (primary) replaced; storefront altered;
openings added; openings altered; wall
cladding replacedIntegrity
Retains integrity of location, setting,
materials, workmanship, feeling, and
association.
■ Rectangular plan with frequently symmetrical façade
■
■
Low‐pitched front gable roof with built‐up roofing; pent roof at primary façade with clay barrel tile shingles ■
Exterior walls veneered in smooth plaster; vertical wood siding at pr imary façade ■
Pent roof forms simple arcaded entrance canopy
■
Partially‐glazed divided‐light wood door recessed at center of primary façade ■
Fully‐glazed divided‐light French doors with simple surrounds Small, arched openings at entrance canopy
P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structure, and objects.) *P3b. Resource Attributes:

HP6. 1‐3 story commercial property
*P4. Resources Present ■ Building
*P5b. Description of Photo
Historic Resources Group, 2020
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source
c. 1930, Visual assessment
*P7. Owner and Address
*P8. Recorded by:

Historic Resources Group
12 S Fair Oaks Ave, Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
*P9. Date Recorded March 2021
*P10. Survey Type Intensive
*P11. Report Citation:Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement and Survey Report, February 2019. *Attachments: ■Building, Structure, and Object Record
Additional Features
No setback from sidewalk■
741
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

Page 2 of 2 ends

*Resource Name or #: 5838 Hollister Ave
B1. Historic Name: B2. Common Name: Altamirano's Mexican Grill B3. Original Use: Commercial B4. Present Use: Commercial *B5. Architectural Style: Mediterranean Revival
*B6. Construction History:
*B7. Moved No Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features B9a. Architect: b. Builder:

B10. Significance:Development Between the Wars (1919‐1940): Commercial Development (1919‐1940) Area Goleta Period of Significancec. 1930 Property Type: Commercial Applicable CriteriaLocal Criterion 2(a) 5838 Hollister Avenue appears eligible under Local Criterion 2(a). It was included on the General Plan List and is located within the Old Town Heritage Overlay Zone.

Criterion 2(a)
5838 Hollister Avenue appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under local Criterion 2(a) as a rare local example of commercial development from the 1930s, during a period of continued growth and development of the towns of La Goleta and La Patera. It is an increasingly rare representation of the continued expansion of Hollister Avenue as Goleta's primary commercial corridor during the Great Depression.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
*B12. References
Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement, February 2019.

City of Goleta Building Permits.

Goleta Ci
ty Directories.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.

B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Christine Lazzaretto; Molly Iker‐Johnson; Robby Aranguren *Date of Evaluation: March 2021
742
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 5S3
Other Listings

Page 1 ends

P1. Other Identifier
*a. County Santa Barbara County
*P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as Necessary.) *b USGS 7.5' Quad Goleta Date 2018 T 4N ; R 28W ; of of Sec B. M. c.Address 6769 Hollister Ave City Goleta Zip 93117
Zone 11Sd. UTM: , 236634.935 mE/ 3813519.608 mN APN: 073‐610‐001e. Other Locational Data:
*P3a. Description
Character‐defining Features
■ One and two‐story configuration
Alterations
Some windows may be replaced
Integrity
Retains integrity of location, design, setting,
materials, workmanship, feeling, and
association.
■ Horizontal massing
■
■
Flat roof with wide overhanging eaves
■
Unadorned wall surfaces; glass, plaster and stone used as exterior wall panels and accent materials ■
Double‐height steel and glass entry vestibule projects from center of primary façade ■
Pairs of fully‐glazed frameless doors
■
Flush‐mounted metal frame fixed windows
Little or no exterior decorative detailing
P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structure, and objects.) *P3b. Resource Attributes:

HP8. Industrial building
*P4. Resources Present ■ Building
*P5b. Description of Photo
Historic Resources Group, 2020
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source
1957, Goleta: The Good Land
*P7. Owner and Address
*P8. Recorded by:

Historic Resources Group
12 S Fair Oaks Ave, Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
*P9. Date Recorded March 2021
*P10. Survey Type Intensive
*P11. Report Citation:Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement and Survey Report, February 2019. *Attachments: ■Building, Structure, and Object Record
Additional Features
Surface parking lots paved in asphaltic
concrete surround the facility
743
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

Page 2 ends

*Resource Name or #: 6769 Hollister Ave
B1. Historic Name: B2. Common Name: FLIR Thermal Imaging B3. Original Use: Industrial B4. Present Use: Industrial *B5. Architectural Style: Mid‐century Modern;
*B6. Construction History:
1956: Aerophysics D.C. administration building, research building, auditorium, several parking lots; 1957: Research building II; 1957: engineering building; 1957: cafeteria building; 1961: add storage building to R&D building; 1962: terminal ballistics lab; 1962: service tower; 1962: vehicle test track; 1963: add receiving and shipping building; 1964: roof over existing dock; 1964: relocate guard house; 1964: addition to utility building; 1965: storage area addition; 1965: addition to research building; 1965: addition to flight physics facility; 1965: drive test facilities; 1966: add research building; 1966: add utility building, woodshop, dock, shock tube laboratory, hi‐impact machine building, industrial research building, flight physics control building; 1966: close in of existing dock; 1969: rooftop addition; 1970: automotive servicing; 1972: addition flight physics building; 1972: isolation pad; 1974: coverage storage addition to flight physics building; 1975: add rain screen; 1978: add enclosed lining area to existing facility; 1979: roof extension; 1979: flammable storage and extensions to utility building; 1981: storage vault; 1982: block wall facing interior parking lot and screen; 1983: modular offices; 1984:
addition and flammable storage building; 1984: extension of loading dock; 1985: carport; 1986: LUP ‐ hypervelocity addition; 1987: LUP ‐ Delco SW parking lot; 1987: outdoor stairway ‐ emergency exit manufacturing building; 1988: mezzanine structural strengthening; 1989: Delco Electronics Research Buildings ‐ remodel Magic Five Laba and Receiving and Inspection ‐ construction of a storage shed on the east side of Research Bui
lding (Kruger Bensen Ziemer, Architects), Administration, research building, engineering, café, utility building on property; 1989: conference facility; 1989: chemical storage facility; 1989: two temporary trailers to be used as office space; 1990: gun range security storage; 1990: three storage rooms; 1991: fire access road; 1991: 14 trailers; 1992: R&D building failure analysis relocation; 1995: addition to aerophysics building; 1995: construct two loading docks, access ramps, open steel canopies, and pave 47000 sf parking area *B7. Moved No Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features Area Goleta
B9a. Architect: Howell, Arendt, Mosher & Grant; Novikoff Engin b. Builder:

B10. Significance: Post‐World War II Development (1946‐1969): Aerospace Industry Period of Significance1957 Property Type: Industrial Applicable Criteria Local Criterion 2(a) This evaluation is for the former primary building on the Delco campus, located at the southwest corner of Hollister Avenue and Coromar Drive. It appears eligible under Local Criteria 2(a) and 2(c).

Criterion 2(a)
The former primary building on the Delco campus appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under local Criterion 2(a) as good local example of industrial development associated with the aerospace industry from the post‐World War II period, and for its association with Delco Systems Operations. The campus has a strong association with the aerospace industry, which quickly became Golet a’s dominant industry in the postwar period. Delco Systems Operations made significant contributions to aerospace industry and influenced the postwar development of Goleta.

The aerospace industry became a significant factor in Goleta starting in the mid‐1950s, with Aerophysics, Raytheon, and Hughes each establishing a presence in the city.

The space needed to house both the industries and their employees radically transformed Goleta’s l andscape. Former walnut and lemon orchards gave way to industrial development and dozens of new, single‐family residential subdivisions.

In October 1960, General Motors (GM) purchased the former Aerophysics facility for its Defense Systems Division. Two years later, GM created the GM Research Laboratories to conduct research and development activities on defense systems. GM Research Laboratories later merged with Delco Electronics, and was renamed Delco Systems Operations. The company was involved in developing early missile guidance systems during the Cold War, guidance systems for NASA's Apollo lunar program, and systems engineering for the Apollo Lunar Roving Vehicle. To test the maneuverability of the rovers, a moonscape was built behind the engineering building.

Criterion 2(c)
The former primary building on the Delco campus also appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under local Criterion 2(c) as a good example of Mid‐ century Modern commercial/industrial architecture designed by Howell, Arendt, Mosher & Grant. It exhibits quality of design and distinctive features, including the flat roof with wide overhanging eaves; glass, plaster, and stone exterior wall panels and accents; and the lack of exterior decorative detailing.

Other buildings on the former Delco campus may also be eligible for this association. They are not fully visible from the public right‐of‐way; therefore, additional information is needed to fully evaluate the campus.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
*B12. References
Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement, February 2019.

City of Goleta Building Permits.

Gole
ta City Directories.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.

B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Christine Lazzaretto; Molly Iker‐Johnson; Robby Aranguren *Date of Evaluation: March 2021
Aerophysics Dev. Corp.; Litton Industries; GM Defense Research Laboratories; Delco 744
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial

Page 3 of 3 ends

*Recorded by: Historic Resources Group *Date: March 2021 ◼ Continuation □ Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
Significance Statement (continued):

Other buildings on the former Delco campus may also be eligible for this association. They are not fully visible from the public right-of-way; therefore, additional information is needed to fully evaluate the campus.

Historic Photo(s):
1961, University of California, Santa Barbara, Special Collections 745
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 5S3
Other Listings General Plan List

Page 1 of 2 ends

P1. Other Identifier
*a. County Santa Barbara County
*P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as Necessary.) *b USGS 7.5' Quad Goleta Date 2018 T 4N ; R 28W ; of of Sec B. M. c. Addre
ss 110 S Kell
ogg Ave City Goleta Zip 93117
Zone 11Sd. UTM: , 240880.979 mE/ 3814266.022 mN APN: 071‐340‐001e. Other Locational Data:
*P3a. Description
Character‐defining Features
■ One‐story height
Alterations
No major alterations
Integrity
Retains integrity of location, design, setting,
materials, workmanship, feeling, and
association.
■ Horizontal massing
■
■
Low‐pitched gable roof with composition shingle roofing and wide ove rhanging eaves ■
Exterior walls clad in wood clapboard siding
■
Projecting partial‐width porch with heavy masonry porch piers Wood sash double‐hung windows, grouped in multiples; wide, plain window and door surrounds, with extended lintels P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structure, and objects.) *P3b. Resource Attributes:

HP2. Single family property
*P4. Resources Present ■ Building
*P5b. Description of Photo
Historic Resources Group, 2020
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source
1914, Assessor
*P7. Owner and Address
*P8. Recorded by:

Historic Resources Group
12 S Fair Oaks Ave, Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
*P9. Date Recorded March 2021
*P10. Survey Type Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement and Survey Report, February 2019. *Attachments: ■Building, Structure, and Object Record
Additional Features
Barn■
■
■
Water tower
Mature landscaping and trees
746
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

Page 2 of 2 ends

*Resource Name or #: 110 S Kellogg Ave
B2. Common Name: Kellogg Ranch & CondominiumsB1. Historic Name:Kellogg Ranch B3. Original Use: Single family property B4. Present Use: Single family property *B5. Architectural Style: Craftsman
*B6. Construction History:
1957: subdivision of estate of P.E. Kellogg, addition to SFR; 1985: Barn alterations and additions (R. Brian Nelson, architect); 1988: grading and construction of condominium units; 1989: relocate and rebuilt existing garage; 1990: as‐built permit for use of former barn and water tower as dwelling units *B7. Moved No Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features B9a. Architect: b. Builder:

B10. Significance: Late 19th/Early 20th Century Development (1866‐1918): The Development of Two Towns (1869‐1918); Architecture & Design: Craftsman
Area Goleta
Period of Significance1914 Property Type: Single family property Applicable Criteria Local Criterion 2(a); Local Criterion 2(c) This evaluation is for the single‐family residence on the property at 110 S. Kellogg Avenue. It appears eligible under Local Criteria 2(a) and 2(c). The property was included on the General Plan List.

Criterion 2(a)
The single‐family residence on the property at 110 S. Kellogg Avenue appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under local Criterion 2(a) as an excellent and rare remaining example of the original neighborhood that developed adjacent to the commercial corridor between La Goleta and La Patera. The early 20th century was a significant era in Goleta’s development, laying the groundwork for the surrounding area. Additionally, this property was associated with the Kellogg family, which made a significant impact on the early development of Goleta.

Criterion 2(c)
The single‐family residence on the property at 110 S. Kellogg Avenue also appears eligible under Local Criterion 2(c) as good and rare local example of Craftsman style residential architecture. There are relatively few intact examples of Craftsman style residential architecture in Goleta from this period. The building exhibits quality of design and distinctive features including the low‐pitched gable roof with wide overhanging eaves, exterior walls clad in wood clapboard siding, and projecting partial‐width front porch with heavy masonry porch piers.

The Tree Study conducted as part of the Historic Context Statement noted that this property contains the largest California sycamore tree ever measured anywhere on the planet (also partially on the grounds of Johnny D. Wallis Park). Referred to locally as the Sister Witness Tree, though no DNA evidence supports the connection, the tree is officially recognized as a National Champion Tree through American Forests Note that trees in Goleta are regulated under the Goleta Urban Forest Management Plan, adopted June 7, 2011 and amended February 21, 2017. The documentation of trees is outside the scope of this survey.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
*B12. References
Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement, February 2019.

City of Goleta Building Permits.

Goleta City Di
rectories.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.

B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Christine Lazzaretto; Molly Iker‐Johnson; Robby Aranguren *Date of Evaluation: March 2021
747
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 5S3
Other Listings General Plan List

Page 1 of 2 ends

P1. Other Identifier
*a. County Santa Barbara County
*P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as Necessary.) *b USGS 7.5' Quad Goleta Date 2018 T 4N ; R 28W ; of of Sec B. M. c.Address 170 Magnolia Ave City Goleta Zip 93117
Zone 11Sd. UTM: , 240177.011 mE/ 3814169.975 mN APN: 071‐053‐017e. Other Locational Data:
*P3a. Description
Character‐defining Features
■ Two‐story height
Alterations
Windows replaced ‐ all; Addition to rear/side
façade; Some openings altered; Shutters
addedIntegrity
Retains integrity of location, design, setting,
materials, workmanship, feeling, and
association.
■ Rectangular plan and simple massing
■ Wood frame construction
■ Gabled roof with open eaves with brackets and decorative fascia ■ Horizontal wood siding
■ Partial‐width porch
■ Single wood door with simple surround
P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structure, and objects.) *P3b. Resource Attributes:

HP5. Hotel/motel
*P4. Resources Present ■ Building
*P5b. Description of Photo
Historic Resource Group, 2020
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source
1915, County list
*P7. Owner and Address
*P8. Recorded by:

Historic Resources Group
12 S Fair Oaks Ave, Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
*P9. Date Recorded March 2021
*P10. Survey Type Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement and Survey Report, February 2019. *Attachments: ■Building, Structure, and Object Record
Additional Features
748
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

Page 2 of 2 ends

*Resource Name or #: 170 Magnolia Ave
B2. Common Name: Park PlaceB1. Historic Name: Ellwood Hotel B3. Original Use: Commercial B4. Present Use: Multiple family property *B5. Architectural Style:Residential vernacular
*B6. Construction History:
1955: LUP ‐ 2 existing MFRs on property
*B7. Moved No Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features B9a. Architect: b. Builder:

B10. Significance:Late 19th/Early 20th Century Development (1866‐1918): The Development of Two Towns (1869‐1918) Area Goleta Period of Significance1915 Property Type: Multiple family propert Applicable Criteria Local Criterion 2(a) The building at 170 Magnolia Avenue, historically known as the Ellwood Hotel, appears eligible under Local Criterion 2(a). It was included on the General Plan List.

Criterion 2(a)
The building at 170 Magnolia Avenue appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under Local Criterion 2(a) as a rare extant example of early commercial development near the original town center of La Patera. The Ellwood Hotel was established in 1915 to serve visitors to the growing commercial corridor betwee
n La Patera and La Goleta; it later catered to the growing number of automobile tourists traveling along the California coast. The building is now one of few remaining commercial buildings from the early 20th century in the City of Goleta, and is uniquely representative of the early 20th century commercial development of Goleta a
nd the growing popularity of tourism throughout the state as the century progressed.

The early 20th century was a significant era in Goleta’s development, laying the groundwork for future development of the area. As the Goleta Valley shifted from cattle ranches to individual farmsteads, new farmers required goods and services. To serve their needs, two towns grew up along the County Road (present‐day Hollister Avenue).

La Patera, named for the gathering of ducks in the adjacent marshy slough, was located at the corner of Fairview and Hollister Avenues. La Goleta, located on the north side of Hollister Avenue at Patterson Avenue, wa s situated on the southwestern portion of the La Goleta land grant.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
*B12. References
Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement, February 2019.

City of Goleta Building Permits.

Goleta Ci
ty Directories.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.

B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Christine Lazzaretto; Molly Iker‐Johnson; Robby Aranguren *Date of Evaluation: March 2021
749
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 5S3
Other Listings

Page 1 of 2 ends

P1. Other Identifier
*a. County Santa Barbara County
*P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as Necessary.) *b USGS 7.5' Quad Goleta Date 2018 T 4N ; R 28W ; of of Sec B. M. c.Address 170 Nectarine Ave City Goleta Zip 93117
Zone 11Sd. UTM: , 240296.732 mE/ 3814158.527 mN APN: 071‐061‐015e. Other Locational Data:
*P3a. Description
Character‐defining Features
■ Two‐story height
Alterations
Addition to rear/side façade; Security door
added; opening added; balcony railing
altered; roof cladding may have been
replaced
Integrity
Retains integrity of location, design, setting,
materials, workmanship, feeling, and
association.
■ Rectangular plan and simple massing
■ Wood frame construction
■ Cross‐gabled roof with open eaves
■ Smooth cement plaster wall cladding
■ Two‐story, partial‐width front porch with second‐story balcony P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structure, and objects.) *P3b. Resource Attributes:

HP2. Single family property
*P4. Resources Present ■ Building
*P5b. Description of Photo
Historic Resources Group, 2020
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source
c. 1920, Historic photograph
*P7. Owner and Address
*P8. Recorded by:

Historic Resources Group
12 S Fair Oaks Ave, Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
*P9. Date Recorded March 2021
*P10. Survey Type Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement and Survey Report, February 2019. *Attachments: ■Building, Structure, and Object Record
Additional Features
Wide, plain window and door surrounds;
round terra cotta attic vents
750
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

Page 2 of 2 ends

*Resource Name or #: 170 Nectarine Ave
B1. Historic Name: B2. Common Name:

B3. Original Use: Single family residence B4. Present Use: Single family residence *B5. Architectural Style: Residential vernacular
*B6. Construction History:
*B7. Moved No Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features B9a. Architect: b. Builder:

B10. Significance:Development Between the Wars (1919‐1940): Residential Development (1919‐1940) Area Goleta Period of Significancec. 1920 Property Type: Single family residence Applicable Criteria Local Criterion 2(a) The residence at 170 Nectarine Avenue, constructed c. 1920, appears eligible under Local Criterion 2(a).

Criterion 2(a)
The residence at 170 Nectarine Avenue appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark as a rare example of residential development from the early 1920s.

This is a remnant of the original residential neighborhood that developed adjacent to the commercial corridor between the two towns of La Goleta and La Patera. The early 20th century wa
s a significant era in Goleta’s development, laying the groundwork for future development of the area.

Many residences constructed between 1919 and 1940 in Goleta are located near the town of La Patera, which became the commercial center of Goleta in 1933, when the United States Postal Service established the Goleta post office there. Residential develop ment was disorganized during the period. Several housing tracts were laid out in the 1920s, but were generally not highly developed due to the area’s lack of available water. Most surviving residences from this period originated as a result of scattered development within th
ese subdivisions.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
*B12. References
Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement, February 2019.

City of Goleta Building Permits.

Goleta Ci
ty Directories.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.

B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Christine Lazzaretto; Molly Iker‐Johnson; Robby Aranguren *Date of Evaluation: March 2021
751
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 5S3
Other Listings General Plan List

Page 1 of 2 ends

P1. Other Identifier
*a. County Santa Barbara County
*P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as Necessary.) *b USGS 7.5' Quad Goleta Date 2018 T 4N ; R 28W ; of of Sec B. M. c.Address 171 Nectarine Ave City Goleta Zip 93117
Zone 11Sd. UTM: , 240246.704 mE/ 3814182.017 mN APN: 071‐053‐010e. Other Locational Data:
*P3a. Description
Character‐defining Features
■ One‐story height
Alterations
Windows replaced ‐ some; Site plan
somewhat altered ‐ gas station demolished
and some cottages re‐sited;Site plan
somewhat altered ‐ gas station demolished
and some cottages re‐sited
Integrity
Retains integrity of location, design, setting,
materials, workmanship, feeling, and
association.
■ Rectangular plan and simple massing
■ Wood frame construction
■ Gabled roof with open eaves
■ Horizontal wood siding
■
■
Single door with simple surround
Double hung, wood sash windows
P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structure, and objects.) *P3b. Resource Attributes:

HP5. Hotel/motel
*P4. Resources Present ■ Building
*P5b. Description of Photo
Historic Resources Group, 2020
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source
c. 1920, County list
*P7. Owner and Address
*P8. Recorded by:

Historic Resources Group
12 S Fair Oaks Ave, Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
*P9. Date Recorded March 2021
*P10. Survey Type Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement and Survey Report, February 2019. *Attachments: ■Building, Structure, and Object Record
Additional Features
Grouping of modest one‐story bungalows
752
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

Page 2 of 2 ends

*Resource Name or #: 171 Nectarine Ave
B2. Common Name: Camel Auto Court; College MotelB1. Historic Name:Camel Auto Court B3. Original Use: Commerci
al B4. Present Use: Multiple family property
*B5. Architectural Style: Residential Vernacular;
*B6. Construction History:
1955: request to remodel Camel Auto Court ‐ move existing buildings to new locations 1. Office 5' from Nectarine Street, 2. 10' setback from Nectarine Ave for moved cottage, 3. 8' setback from Northerly property line for moved cottages, 4. 5' setback from westerly property line for moved cottages; 1957: Bathroom additions to five units; 1971: bathroom additions to five units *B7. Moved No Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features B9a. Architect: b. Builder:

B10. Significance:Development Between the Wars (1919‐1940): Commercial Development (1919‐1940) Area Goleta Period of Significancec. 1920 Property Type: Multiple family propert Applicable Criteria Local Criterion 2(a) The Camel Motor Court appears eligible under Local Criterion 2(a). It was included on the General Plan List.

Criterion 2(a)
The Camel Motor Court appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under Local Criterion 2(a) as a rare early example of auto‐related commercial development in Goleta. The Camel Motor Court was established c. 1920 alongside a gasoline station (demolished). This early predecessor to the more widely known motel was a collection of modest cabins designed to offer lodgings to auto tourists traveling through Goleta along the commercial thoroughfare of Hollister Avenue. It is the only known motor court in Goleta, and is the
refore uniquely representative of early 20th century automobile tourism in the area.

In the 1920s, the automobile was the leading consumer product in the country, and by 1925 there was one automobil e for every six Americans (compared to one for every 100 in Great Britain). The automobile and the freedom it represented touched the American spirit of indivi dualism and exploration, and the new motor tourist – upper and middle cl
ass alike ‐‐ was lured by the adventure of the open road, unencumbered by the routes and schedules of the railr oads. Several Goleta businesses catered to the new breed of automobile tourists, including the Camel Auto Court and gasoline station.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
*B12. References
Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement, February 2019.

City of Goleta Building Permits.

Goleta Ci
ty Directories.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.

B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Christine Lazzaretto; Molly Iker‐Johnson; Robby Aranguren *Date of Evaluation: March 2021
753
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 5S3
Other Listings General Plan List

Page 1 of 2 ends

HP2. Single family property
*P4. Resources Present ■ Building
*P5b. Description of Photo
Historic Resources Group, 2020
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source
1887, Beck House, A Goleta Farmhouse Reborn
*P7. Owner and Address
*P8. Recorded by:

Historic Resources Group
12 S Fair Oaks Ave, Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
*P9. Date Recorded March 2021
*P10. Survey Type Intensive
*P11. Report Citation:Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement and Survey Report, February 2019. *Attachments: ■Building, Structure, and Object Record
Additional Features
Decorative medallion at gable end on
east façade; mature trees and
landscaping
■ Paneled wood door with simple surround at primary entrance 754
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

Page 2 of 2 ends

*Resource Name or #: 5399 Overpass Rd
B2. Common Name: Santa Barbara Humane SocietyB1. Historic Name:Beck House B3. Original Use: Single family property B4. Present Use: Institutional *B5. Architectural Style: Residential Vernacular; Queen Anne *B6. Construction History:
1963: LUP animal shelter; 1965: 32 sf roof sign; 1968: remodel interior to service SFD; 1969: interior alterations only to existing infirmary; 1971: remodel barn; 1972: puppy shelter; 1973: storage room; 1979: cat kennel; 1981: room enclosure; 1982: dog kennels, relocated to save existing trees; 1984: Master plan (Ketzel & Goodman); 1984: cat kennel, roof addition, dog runs, barn extension; 1984: cat kennel and showroom;
*B7. Moved No Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features B9a. Architect: b. Builder: David Beck
B10. Significance:Late 19th/Early 20th Century Development (1866‐1918): The Development of Two Towns (1869‐1918) Area Goleta Period of Significance1887 Property Type: Institutional Applicable Criteria Local Criterion 2(a) This evaluation is for the farmhouse on the property. It appears eligible under Local Criterion 2(a). It was included on the General Plan List.

Criterion 2(a)
The forme
r Beck family farmhouse at 5399 Overpass Road appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under local Criterion 2(a). It was constructed in 1887, during an early pe
riod of development in Goleta. The Beck House is an excellent and rare remaining example of agriculture‐related residential development from the late 19th century in Goleta.

During the
1870s, the character of the Goleta area began to shift from sparsely populated cattle ranches to farmsteads and towns. The new farmers required goods and services such as farm machinery, wagons and buggies, blacksmithing, and general supplies. To serve their needs, two towns grew up along the County Road (present‐day Hollister Avenue), the main road linking the isolated farms with Santa Barbara, More’s Landing, and points north. La Patera, named for the gathering of ducks in the adjacent marshy slough, was located at the corner of Fairview and Hollister Avenues, and was established in 1869. La Goleta, located on the north side of Hollister Avenue at Patterson Avenue, was situated on the southwestern portion of the La Goleta land grant. It too was founded in 1869. Between 1870 and 1890, the population of the Goleta Valley increased from 200 to 700 people. The two towns continued to serve the farming community as separate entities for approximately 60 years. Though the Valley’s popula
tion grew steadily, the towns themselves saw little development.

Among those farme
rs who moved to the Goleta Valley in the late 19th century was Davi d Beck. Beck was born in Maryland in 1826. He lived and worked as a carpenter, contractor, and builder in Pennsylvania, Illinois, and San Bernardino County. In the 1880s, Beck moved to the Goleta Valley, where he became a farmer, primarily growing walnuts on his 27‐acre ranch off of Patterson Road. He married Jennie Haig in 1890, and prior to their marriage, constructed a two‐story farmhouse on his property for them to live in. Beck died in 1915 at the age of 90. Over time, pieces of the ranch were sold off, until the State of California acquired the land, including the reside nce, barn, and outbuildings.

More information about this property may be found in "Beck House, A Goleta Farmhouse Reborn," by Gary B. Coombs and Jon Bartel.

The property has numerous mature trees. Note that trees in Goleta are regulated under the Goleta Urban Forest Management Pla n, adopted June 7, 2011 and amended
February 21, 2017. The documentation of trees is outside the scope of thi s survey.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
*B12. References
Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement, February 2019.

City of Goleta Building Permits.

Goleta City Di
rectories.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.

B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Christine Lazzaretto; Molly Iker‐Johnson; Robby Aranguren *Date of Evaluation: March 2021
755
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 5S3
Other Listings General Plan List

Page 1 of 2 ends

P1. Other Identifier
*a. County Santa Barbara County
*P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as Necessary.) *b USGS 7.5' Quad Goleta Date 2018 T 4N ; R 28W ; of of Sec B. M. c. Addre
ss 195 S Patterson
Ave City Goleta Zip 93111
Zone 11Sd. UTM: , 241866.694 mE/ 3814011.692 mN APN: 071‐102‐005e. Other Locational Data:
*P3a. Description
Character‐defining Features
■ One‐story height
Alterations
Windows replaced ‐ some; Addition to
rear/side façade
Integrity
Retains integrity of location, design, setting,
materials, workmanship, feeling, and
association.
■ Rectangular plan with symmetrical façade
■
■
Hipped roof with clay barrel tiles and eave cornice
■
Exterior walls veneered in smooth plaster
■
Shallow brick stoop
■
Elaborate door surround with arched transom
■
Arched window openings
Decorative grilles of cast plaster
P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structure, and objects.) *P3b. Resource Attributes:

HP6. 1‐3 story commercial building
*P4. Resources Present ■ Building
*P5b. Description of Photo
Historic Resources Group, 2020
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source
c. 1925, Sanborn; historic aerial photographs
*P7. Owner and Address
*P8. Recorded by:

Historic Resources Group
12 S Fair Oaks Ave, Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
*P9. Date Recorded March 2021
*P10. Survey Type Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement and Survey Report, February 2019. *Attachments: ■Building, Structure, and Object Record
Additional Features
756
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

Page 2 of 2 ends

*Resource Name or #: 195 S Patterson Ave
B2. Common Name: Pendulum Faire Clock ShoppeB1. Historic Name:Telephone Exchange Building B3. Original Use: Commercial B4. Present Use: Commercial *B5. Architectural Style:Mediterranean Revival
*B6. Construction History:
1982: change of use to store
*B7. Moved No Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features B9a. Architect: b. Builder:

B10. Significance: Development Between the Wars (1919‐1940): Commercial Development (1919‐1940); Architecture and Design:

Mediterranean Revival
Area Goleta
Period of Significancec. 1925 Property Type: Commercial Applicable Criteria Local Criterion 2(a); Local Criterion 2(c) The building at 195 S. Patterson Avenue appears eligible under Local Criteria 2(a) and 2(c). It was included on the General Plan List.

Criterion 2(a)
The former Associated Telephone Company building at 195 S. Patterson Avenue appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under local Criterion 2(a) for its association with 1920s infrastructure in Goleta. It is a rare remaining commercial building from the 1920s in Goleta, representing the area's transformation during that decade from two separate towns to one commercial center.

Associated Telephone replaced the operator at the telephone exchange in Edgar Blakeway’s store with modern switching equipment at a small building at 195 Patterson Avenue. This became the Goleta Central Office for Associated Telephone. Goleta and La Patera’s commercial districts combined to become one commercial center in 1933, when the United States Postal Service established the Goleta post office in La Patera, changing that town’s name and effectively combining the neighboring settlements.

Criterion 2(c)
Additionally, the former Associated Telephone Company building at 195 S. Patterson Avenue appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under Criterion 2(c) as a good local example of Mediterranean Revival architecture. It exhibits quality of design and distinctive features, including the hipped roof with clay barrel tiles and eave cornice, exterior walls veneered in smooth plaster, and the elaborate door surround with arched transom and decorative grille of cast plaster.

The Mediterranean Revival style is distinguished by its eclectic mix of architectural elements from several regions around the Mediterranean Sea, including Spain, Italy, southern France, and North Africa. The Mediterranean Revival style i s sometimes more formal and usually more elaborately composed and ornamented than the simpler, more rustic Spanish Colonial Revival style, and often more flamboyant than the sober Italian Renaissance Revival style. Typical features of the Mediterranean Revival style include arched entrance doorways with richly detaile d surrounds; arcades and loggias; stairways and terraces with cast stone balustrades; and Classical decorative ele
ments in cast stone or plaster, including architraves, stringcourses, cornices, pilasters, columns, and quoins.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
*B12. References
Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement, February 2019.

City of Goleta Building Permits.

Goleta Ci
ty Directories.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.

B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Christine Lazzaretto; Molly Iker‐Johnson; Robby Aranguren *Date of Evaluation: March 2021
757
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 5S3
Other Listings

Page 1 ends

P1. Other Identifier
*a. County Santa Barbara County
*P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as Necessary.) *b USGS 7.5' Quad Goleta Date 2018 T 4N ; R 28W ; of of Sec B. M. c. Addre
ss 13
0 Robin Hill Rd City Goleta Zip 93117
Zone 11Sd. UTM: , 238653.09 mE/ 3813977.30 mN APN: 073‐050‐015e. Other Locational Data:
*P3a. Description
Character‐defining Features
■ Two‐story configuration
Alterations
No major alterations
Integrity
Retains integrity of location, design, setting,
materials, workmanship, feeling, and
association.
■ Horizontal massing; simple geometric forms
■
■
Flat roof
■
Unadorned wall surfaces; glass, plaster, and steel exterior wall pa nels ■
Recessed beneath projecting second story
■
Pair of fully‐glazed metal frame doors
■
Flush‐mounted metal frame fixed windows
No exterior decorative detailing
P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structure, and objects.) *P3b. Resource Attributes:

HP8. Industrial building
*P4. Resources Present ■ Building
*P5b. Description of Photo
Historic Resources Group, 2020
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source
c. 1960, Visual assessment; permits
*P7. Owner and Address
*P8. Recorded by:

Historic Resources Group
12 S Fair Oaks Ave, Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
*P9. Date Recorded March 2021
*P10. Survey Type Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement and Survey Report, February 2019. *Attachments: ■Building, Structure, and Object Record
Additional Features
Surface parking paved in asphaltic concrete
surrounds the building
758
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

Page 2 ends

*Resource Name or #: 130 Robin Hill Rd
B1. Historic Name:Edgerton, Germeshausen & Grier, Inc.: University Research B2. Common Name:

B3. Original Use: Industrial B4. Present Use: Industrial *B5. Architectural Style: Mid‐century Modern
*B6. Construction History:
1963: Addition to plant; 1964: pole sign; 1964: aluminum canopy roof over patio; 1965: neuron room; 1969: Service area; 1971: Conference room retrofit; 1984: aluminum carport; 1984: addition to light industrial building; 1995: remodel first floor of building; 1995: partial 2nd floor remodel; 1999: partition walls *B7. Moved No Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features B9a. Architect: Stice and Takayama Associates b. Builder:

B10. Significance: Post‐World War II Development (1946‐1969): Aerospace Industry; Architecture & Design: Mid‐century Modern Area Goleta Period of Significancec. 1960 Property Type: Industrial Applicable Criteria Local Criterion 2(a); Local Criterion 2(c) The former Edgerton, Germeshausen & Grier, Inc. (EG&G) building at 130 Robin Hill Road appears eligible under Local Criteria 2(a) and 2(c).

Criterion 2(a)
The former EG&G building at 130 Robin Hill Road appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under Local Criterion 2 (a) as an excellent local example of industrial development associated with the aerospace industry from the post‐World War II period. It has a strong association with the aerospace industry, which quickly became Goleta’s dominant industry in the postwar period. Edgerton, Germeshausen & Grier, Inc. made significant contributions to aerospace industry and influenced the postwar de
velopment of Goleta.

The aerospace industry became a significant factor in Goleta starting in the mid‐1950s, with Aerophysics, Raytheon, and Hughes each establishing a presence in the city.

The space needed to house both the industries and their employees r adically transformed Goleta’s landscape. Former walnut and lemon orchards gave way to industrial development and dozens of new, single‐family residential subdivisions.

Harold Edgerton, Kenneth Germeshausen, and Herbert Grier became an incorporated partnership in 1947 at the request of the Atomic Energy Commission. Now known as EG&G, Inc., they designed and operated systems that timed and triggered nuclear bomb tests. To take still pictures of atomic bombs, which release a huge burst of light, Edgergon, Germeshausen & Grier invented the “rapatronic” (rapid electronic) camera. When light from the bomb hit the photocell in the camera, it triggered a mechanism that opened and then cut off the exposure in as little as two microseconds. By 1950, EG&G had perfected their ultra‐high‐speed techniques. They designed a camera shutter that had no moving mechanical parts, making possible photographs with an exposure time of from four‐ to ten‐millionths of a second.

Criterion 2(c)
The
former EG&G building also appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under Local Criterion 2(c) as a good local example of Mid‐century Modern industrial architecture by Stice and Takayama Associates. It exhibits quality of design and distinctive features, including the gl ass, plaster, and steel exterior wall panels; primary entrance recessed beneath projecting second story; and flat roof.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
*B12. References
Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement, February 2019.

City of Goleta Building Permits.

Goleta Ci
ty Directories.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.

B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Christine Lazzaretto; Molly Iker‐Johnson; Robby Aranguren *Date of Evaluation: March 2021
759
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial

Page 3 of 3 ends

*Recorded by: Historic Resources Group *Date: March 2021 ◼ Continuation □ Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
Significance Statement (continued):

Little is known about Stice and Takayama Associates. Aside from this building, the firm's only known work is Village Medical Center in Thousand Oaks (1963).
760
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 5S3
Other Listings

Page 1 of 2 ends

HP2. Single family property
*P4. Resources Present ■ Building
*P5b. Description of Photo
Historic Resources Group, 2020
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source
1930, Assessor
*P7. Owner and Address
*P8. Recorded by:

Historic Resources Group
12 S Fair Oaks Ave, Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
*P9. Date Recorded March 2021
*P10. Survey Type Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement and Survey Report, February 2019. *Attachments: ■Building, Structure, and Object Record
Additional Features
Diagonal siting on parcel■
761
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

Page 2 of 2 ends

*Resource Name or #: 6260 Shamrock Ave
B1. Historic Name: B2. Common Name:

B3. Original Use: Single family property B4. Present Use: Single family property *B5. Architectural Style: American Colonial Revival
*B6. Construction History:
*B7. Moved No Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features B9a. Architect: b. Builder:

B10. Significance:Development Between the Wars (1919‐1940): Residential Development (1919‐1940) Area Goleta Period of Significance1930 Property Type: Single family property Applicable CriteriaLocal Criterion 2(a) The residence at 6260 Shamrock Avenue appears eligible under Local Criterion 2(a).

Criterion 2(a)
The residence at 6260 Shamrock Avenue appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under Local Criterion 2(a) as a rare extant example of residential development from the 1930s in Goleta. This residence predates the surrounding area by several decades and may have a historic association with the agriculture industry.

Many residences constructed between 1919 and 1940 in Goleta are located near the town of La Patera, which became the commercial center of Goleta in 1933, when the United States
Postal Service established the Goleta post office there. Residential development was disorganized during the period. Several housing tracts were laid out in the 1920s, but were generally not highly developed due to the area’s lack of available water. Most surviving residences from this period originated as a result of scattered development within these subdivisions.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
*B12. References
Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement, February 2019.

City of Goleta Building Permits.

Goleta City Directories.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.

B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Christine Lazzaretto; Molly Iker‐Johnson; Robby Aranguren *Date of Evaluation: March 2021
762
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
NRHP Status Code 5S3
Other Listings General Plan List

Page 1 ends

HP6. 1‐3 story commercial building
*P4. Resources Present ■ Building
*P5b. Description of Photo
Historic Resources Group, 2020
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source
1959, The Timbers Prospectus
*P7. Owner and Address
*P8. Recorded by:

Historic Resources Group
12 S Fair Oaks Ave, Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
*P9. Date Recorded March 2021
*P10. Survey Type Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement and Survey Report, February 2019. *Attachments: ■Building, Structure, and Object Record
Additional Features
Surface parking lot paved in asphaltic
concrete surrounds building; large
greenhouse skylight
■ Wide chimney clad in stone
763
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
State of California ‐‐ The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

Page 2 ends

*Resource Name or #: 10 Winchester Cyn Rd
B2. Common Name: The Timbers; Timbers RoadhouseB1. Historic Name:The Timbers Restaurant and Shops B3. Original Use: Commercial B4. Present Use: Commercial *B5. Architectural Style: Ranch
*B6. Construction History:
*B7. Moved No Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features B9a. Architect: Graham, James A. b. Builder:

B10. Significance:Post‐World War II Development (1946‐1969): Post‐World War II Commercial Development Area Goleta Period of Significance1959 Property Type: Commercial Applicable Criteria Local Criterion 2(a) The restaurant building known as The Timbers appears eligible under Local Criterion 2(a). It was included on the General Plan List.

Criterion 2(a)
The Timbers appears eligible for listing as a City of Goleta Historic Landmark under local Criterion 2(a) as an example of post‐World War II commercial development representing increased development along the commercial corridors associated with significant local growth in the postwar period. It is the long‐term home of the legacy business The Timbers Restaurant, which operated in various forms at the building since its construction in 1969 through 2003, and has become a landmark in the community.

According to local historians, The Timber restaurant building was constructed from the Ellwood pier, which had been destroyed by a Japanese submarine attack in 1942, durin
g World War II. In the 1950s, Tex Blankenship purchased the 12x15 inch pine timbers, some of which showed evidence of the attack, to build the restaurant known as The Timbers.

Stonemasons John and James Rezzonico were hired to build the large fireplace, using stones from the nearby Cachuma Lake project. Unfortunately, Blankenship's The Timbers never opened, and the building sat vacant for nearly a decade before successful restauranteur Sam Villiotes purchased it. The restaurant reopened as Timbers Roadhouse in late 2021.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
*B12. References
Historic Resources Group, City of Goleta Historic Context Statement, February 2019.

City of Goleta Building Permits.

Goleta City Di
rectories.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.

B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Christine Lazzaretto; Molly Iker‐Johnson; Robby Aranguren *Date of Evaluation: March 2021
764
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trino mial

Page 3 of 3 ends

*Recorded by: Historic Resources Group *Date: November 2020  Continuation □ Update DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
Historic Photo(s):

Goleta Valley Historical Society archives
765

ATTACHMENT 4

Planning Commission Resolution 21-05

766
RESOLUTION NO. 21-05

A RESOL

UTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF

GOLETA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL

ADOPT THE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE

VISUAL AND HISTORIC RESOURCES ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL
PLAN/COASTAL LAND USE PLAN; CASE NO. 20-0004-GPA.

The Pla
nning Commission of the City of Goleta does resolve as follows:

SECTION 1: Recitals: The Planning Commission finds and declares that:

A. The Gole
ta General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan ( “General Plan” ) is the City’s official policy that guides land use and phy sical development of the geographic area of the incorporated City limits; and
B. California
Government Code Sections 65350 et seq. authorize cities and counties to prepare, adopt and amend General Plans and their ele ments; and
C. Calif
ornia Government Code Section 65358(a) reads, “If it deems it to be in the public interest, the legislative body may amend all or part of an adopted general plan. An amendment to the general plan shall be initiated in the manner specified b y the legi slative body. Notwithstanding Section 66016, a legislative body that permits persons to request an amendment of the general plan may require that an amount equal to the estimated cost of preparing the amendment be deposited with the planning agen cy prior to the preparation of the amendment”; and
D. T he General
Plan contains several General Plan policies related to
Historic Resources in the Visual and Historic Resources Element; and E. On Apr
il 6, 2021, the City Council init iated General Plan Am endment 20- 0004-GPA at a noticed public hearing; and
F. On May 20,
202 1, requests for consultation with local Native American groups regarding the proposed General Plan Amendment were mailed and no requests for consultation have been received to date. Further, the Barbareno Band of Chumash I ndians and the Northern Chumash Tribal Council (Los Osos area) have indicated that they do not need to consult on this GPA; and
G. On June
14, 2021 , the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing at whic h all interested parties were heard. Further, the Planning Commission considered the entire adm inistrative r ecord 767
Resolut
ion No. 21 -05, Recommending that the City Council Adopt the Proposed GP Amendment to the Visual and Historic Resources Element of the GP/CLUP; Case No. 20-0004-GPA including, without limitation, staff reports, and evidence submit ted during the public hearing.

SECTION 2 Factual Findings and Conclusions: The Planning Commission finds as follows:

A. The
City Council adopted the Goleta General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan (General Plan) on October 2, 2006.

B. The General Plan has been amended twenty-two times previously with the latest occurring on January 19, 2021.

C. T he Gener
al Plan contains Chapter 5 the Visual and H istoric Resources Element which has a number of policies relating to Historic Resources.

D. On June 21
, 2016, the City Council approved a contract with Hist oric Resources Group (HRG) for the development of a Historic Preserva tion Ordinance and, in order to maintain consistency between the General Plan and the Ordinance, amendments to some of the Visual and Historic Policies are necessary.

E. On April 6,
2021, the City Council initiated General Plan Amendment Case No. 20-0004-GPA.

F. The fact
ual findings and conclusions in this Se ction are based upon substantial evidence found within the entirety of the administrative record.

SECTION 3: Environmental Assessmen t for the Project. The Planning Commission makes the following environmental findings:

A. The propos
ed project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines § 15061(b)(3). Specifically, it c an be seen with cer tainty that there is no possibility that the General Plan text amendment would have potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. The proposal is to update the existing languag e of fo ur existing General Plan policies and does not change t he intent of these policies . T he City will continue to recognize t he str uctures an d sites listed in General Plan policy VH 5.1 as important historical resources along with tho se structures formally pl aced on the City’s Historic Resources Inventory. In addition, the City will continue to have policies regarding the establishment of eligibility criteria (VH 5.2), process and considerations associated with alteration proposal s to historic resources (VH 5 .5.), and process and range of alternatives and mitigat ions associated with demolition requests (VH 5.6). For these reasons, the re is no possibility that the activit y i n question can have a significant effect on the environment and thus the activity is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“ CEQA”). (S tate CEQA Guidelines , § 15061(b)(3).)
768
Resolut
ion No. 21 -05, Recommending that the City Council Adopt the Proposed GP Amendment to the Visual and Historic Resources Element of the GP/CLUP; Case No. 20-0004-GPA Furth
er, the GPA would not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment as this is a General Plan tex t amendment and the activity does not satisfy the definition of a “ project” in State CEQA Guidelines S ection 15378 and thus is not subject to CEQA review.

B. T here is
substantial evidence in the record showing that the General Plan text amendment is not an activity subject to CEQA.

SECTION 4: General Plan Amendment Findings . The Planning Comm ission makes the following Findings pursuant to Subsec tion 17.67.040(C) of the Goleta Municipal Code:

A. The amendm
ent is cons istent with the guiding principles and goals of the General Plan.

The propos
ed GPA is consistent with the Guiding Principles and Goals of the City’s General Pl an. The applicable Visual and Hi storic Resources Element Guiding Principles and Goals are:
 Guiding Principle VH-4 (preserve links to Goleta’s architectural past whenever possible to avoid loss of community character).  Guiding Principle VH-5 (preserve the city’s historic structures and sites as irreplaceable resources and protect these resources from deterioration, inappropriate alterations, and demolition).  Guiding Principle VH -6 (encourage owners of historic structures and sites to inv est in maintenance and restoration efforts and, if eligible, seek historic landmark status).
 Guiding Principle VH- 7 (strengthen the character of Goleta Old Town [old Town] to reflect its position as the historic hub of the community.
 Guiding Principle VH-8 (ensure that new construction and additions to existing buildings maintain the character and livabi lity of existing neighborhoods and are designed to fit appropriately within the context of the surrounding area); and
 General Plan Goal VH -5 Historic Resources (identify, protect, and encourage preservation of si gnificant architectural , historic, and prehistoric sites, structures, and properties that comprise Goleta’s heritage).

The propos
ed GPA would be in keeping with the above- referenced
Guiding Principles and Goals as the purpose of this amendment is t o create harmony between the General Plan and Ordinance. The proposed changes are based on the work done to create regulations and standards to implement the General Pla n and on the recent survey work to identify 769
Resolut
ion No. 21 -05, Recommending that the City Council Adopt the Proposed GP Amendment to the Visual and Historic Resources Element of the GP/CLUP; Case No. 20-0004-GPA local historic resources. The GPA will not alter the intent of the abov e- referenced Guiding Principles and Policies, but will strengthen, enhance, and implement what has previously been adopted.

B. The amendm
ent is deemed to be in the public interest.

The propose
d GPA is deemed to be in the publi c inte rest. The
amendment will have no material effect on the community or the General Plan. The GPA will not change the intent of the Visual and Historic Resources Element policies but w ill foster clarity and harmony between the General Plan and the proposed Ordinance. The amendment will make revisions and updates to the General Plan Policies related to historic and cultural resources based on the additional information resulting from the work of the City’s historic r esources consultant. The historic a nd cultural resources policies were adopted over 14 years ago without the benefit of a detailed study of the City by a historic consultant.

Further, the amendment will make revisions and updat es to the General Plan polic ies related to historic and cultural resources based on the additional information resulting from the work of the City’s historic resources consultant. These policies were adopted over 14 years ago without the benefit of a d etailed study of the City by a historic consultant.

The benefit to the City is to have updated policies that are in keeping with both national and State historic resource practices.

SECTION 5: Recommendation. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following actions:

A. Based o
n the findings outlined in Sections 3-4 above, amend the Visual and Historic Resource Element of the Goleta General Plan as provided i n Exhibit 1 (Policies VH 5.1, VH 5.2, VH 5.5 and VH 5.6); and B. D irect
staff to fil e the Notice of Exemption (NOE) within five (5) busines s days after Council action.

SECTION 6: Reliance on Record. Each and every one of the findings and determinations in this Resolution is based on the competent and subs tantial evidence, bot h oral and written, con tained in the entir e record relati ng to the Project. The findings and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of th e Planning Commission in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole.

SECTION 7: Limitations. The Planning Commission’s analysis and evaluation of the Project is based on the best information c urrently available. It is inevitable that in evaluating a project that absolute and perfect knowledge o f all possibl e 770
Resolut
ion No. 21 -05, Recommending that the City Council Adopt the Proposed GP Amendment to the Visual and Historic Resources Element of the GP/CLUP; Case No. 20-0004-GPA aspects of the project will not exist. One of the major limitations on analysis of the Project is the Planning Commission’s lack of knowle dge of future events . In all instances, best efforts have been made to form accurate assumptions. Related to this finding are the limitations on the City’s ability to solve what are in effect regional, state and national problems and issues. The City must work within the political framework within which it exists and with the limitations inherent in that framework.

SECTION 8: Summaries of Information . All summaries of i nformation in the findings, which precede this section, are based on the substantial evidence in the record. The absence of any particular fact from any such s ummary is n ot an indication that a particular finding is not based in part on that fact.

SECTION 9: This Resolution will remain effective until superseded by a subsequent Resolution.

SECTION 10: This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption.

SECTION 11: The City Clerk will certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APP
ROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of June 2021.
___________
_______________

KATIE MAYNARD
CHAIR
ATTEST: APPR
OVED AS TO FORM:
___________
______________ __________________________
DEBORAH S. LOPEZ WINNIE CAI

CITY CLERK ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
771
Resolut
ion No. 21 -05, Recommending that the City Council Adopt the Proposed GP Amendment to the Visual and Historic Resources Element of the GP/CLUP; Case No. 20-0004-GPA STATE

OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA ) ss.

CITY OF GOLETA )
I, DEBORAH S.

LOPEZ, City Clerk of th e City of Go leta, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 21-05 was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Goleta at a regul ar meeting held on the 14th day of June, 2021 by the following roll call vote of the Planning Commission:

AYES: CHAIR MA

YNARD, VICE -CHAIR FULLERTON,
COMMISSIONER J. SMITH
NOES: COM
MISSIONER A. SMITH
ABSENT: C OM

MISSIONER RAMIREZ

ABSTENTI
ONS: NONE
(SEAL)
___________
______________
DEBORAH S. LOPEZ

CITY CLERK
772
Resolution No. 21-05, Exhibit 1

1. General Plan Policy VH 5.1 (GP). At the time of inc orporation, the locally significant historic sites or st ructures that were designated as Landmarks by the County included: Stow House, Sexton House, Goleta Depot, Barnsdall-Rio Grande Gasoline Station, and the Shrode Produce Company Tomato Packing House. In 2006, locally significant historic sites or structures that were designated as Places of Historic Merit included the Daniel Hill Adobe, a portion of the Southern Pac ific Railroad (engineered cut representing the former site of a portion of the Southern P acific Railroad), and Bishop Ranch. Stow House, Sexton House, and the Goleta Depot are listed in the National R egister of Historic Places. In 2021, there are no State Histori c Landmarks in Goleta. The City will maintain a local list of historic resources , the Goleta Historic Resources Inv entory, which includes the historic resources referenced in this policy, to ensure that local resources are protected and preserved.

2. General Plan Policy VH 5.2 : Locally Significant Historic Re sources [GP]. Structures or sites, including landscaping, hav e sp ecial h istoric, aesthetic, or c ultural value to Goleta shall be designated as locally significant historic resources. A locally significa nt historic resource may include those resources list ed, or eligible for listing , in the National Register for Hist oric Places, State Historic La ndmarks, or the Santa Barbara County Landmarks/Places of Historical Merit inventories, as well as resources designated by the City. The City shall establish eligibility criteria, including but not limited to age of the struct ure; exceptional importance in the community; significant contribution from a historic al, architectural, so cial, cultural perspective ; representation as a unique architectural style or workmanship; association with an important historical event or person, etc. Eligibility criteria will be used by the City Council when considering a site or structure, i ncluding landscaping, for designation as a locally significant historic resource.

3. General Plan Policy VH 5.5 : Alterations to Historic Resources. [GP] Any proposed alterations to a designated historic resource or property listed in the City’ s Hist oric Resources Inventory shall respect the character-defining features of the building , its setting, and maintain architectural consistency with the original site or structu re. The review process for alterations is defined in the Historic R esources provisions of Title 17. Such proposals may require the submittal of an historic evaluation from a reco gnized professional as part of th e design review process prior to approval. To encourage rehabil itation, maintenance, and sensitivity in additions and remodels, the City encourages and supports adaptive reuse of structures listed on the Historic Resources Inventory and may c onsider al lowing for flexibilit y when app lying Building Code regulations, including use of the California Historic Building Code, in order 773
Resolution No. 21-05, Exhibit 1

4. to facilitate the retention of character -defining features and maintaining historical significance.

5. General Plan Po licy VH 5.6: D emolition of Histo ric Structures [GP] The City strives to prevent the d emolition o f structures listed on the Historic Resources Inventory. If demolition is proposed, the property owner must demonstrate that all efforts have been made to relo cate or adaptively reuse the structure including but not limited to the submittal of a historic e valuation, a costs analysis, and a structu ral evaluation of the property justifying the demolition request . In the event the City determines that adaptive reus e on si te o r relocation is not fe asible, appropriae mitigation and documentation measures m ust b e undertaken by the applicant. Such measures that may be required of the applicant, includ e but not be limited to the following:
a) Offering the structure for rel ocation and providing public notice of the availability of the structure through adver tisements o r other means.
b) Salvage and reuse building elements that have value and may be irreplaceable such as cornices, columns, mantels, doors, hardware, and lighting fixtures.
c) Prepare written and photographic/ video-graphic documentation of the structure in archival quality format for retention by the City or designated Historical Archive before demolition or relocation. 774

ATTACHMENT 5
Historic Resources Inventory

775
1 City of Goleta
Draft Historic Resources Inventory

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP

DRAFT HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY
LINE
NO.

PHOTO APN STREET
NO.

DIR STREET NAME SUFFIX DATE HISTORIC NAME COMMON NAME PREVIOUSLY

IDENTIFIED
REASON FOR IDENTIFICATION 2021 STATUS
CODE
1 071-033-012 5728 Aguila Ave 1918 This residence appears eligible under local Criterion 2(a) as a rare remnant example of
Goleta's early residential development. The
early 20th century was a significant era in
Goleta’s development, laying the
groundwork for future growth. This property
represents a remnant example of the original
residential neighborhood that developed
adjacent to the commercial corridor between
the two towns of La Goleta and La Patera.

The residence also appears eligible under
local Criterion 2(c) as a rare local example of
a Craftsman bungalow in Goleta. There are
relatively few intact examples of the
Craftsman style in Goleta from this period.
5S3
2 069-560-030 550 Cambridge Dr 1963 University Baptist Church; First Baptist Church of
Goleta Valley
Cambridge Community
Church
This evaluation is for the church building on
the property. It appears eligible under local
Criterion 2(c) as an excellent example of
Mid-century Modern ecclesiastical
architecture in Goleta designed by Kruger-
Bensen architects.
5S3
3 071-101-013 175 Chapel St c. 1915 This residence appears eligible under local Criterion 2(a) as a rare remnant example of
Goleta's early residential development. The
early 20th century was a significant era in
Goleta’s development, laying the
groundwork for future growth. This property
represents a remnant example of the original
residential neighborhood that developed
adjacent to the commercial corridor between
the two towns of La Goleta and La Patera.

The residence also appears eligible under
local Criterion 2(c) as a rare local example of
a Neoclassical Cottage.
5S3
776
2 City of Goleta
Draft Historic Resources Inventory

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP
LINE
NO.

PHOTO APN STREET
NO.

DIR STREET NAME SUFFIX DATE HISTORIC NAME COMMON NAME PREVIOUSLY

IDENTIFIED
REASON FOR IDENTIFICATION 2021 STATUS
CODE
4 073-150-014 75 Coromar Dr 1957 Raytheon; Santa Barbara Research Center
Raytheon This evaluation is for the two buildings at the east side of the Raytheon campus. These
buildings appear eligible under local Criterion
2(a) as an example of industrial development
associated with the aerospace industry from
the post-World War II period. The buildings
have a strong association with the aerospace
industry, which quickly became Goleta’s
dominant industry in the postwar period.

Raytheon made significant contributions to
the aerospace industry and influenced the
postwar development of Goleta.

The buildings also appear eligible under local
Criterion 2(c) as good local examples of Mid-
century Modern industrial architecture.
5S3
5 077-160-022 6595 Covington Way 1965 Christ Lutheran Church Christ Lutheran Church Christ Lutheran Church appears eligible under local Criterion 2(c) as a good local
example of Mid-century Modern
ecclesiastical architecture designed by
architect Robert G. Johnson.
5S3
6 069-090-052 598 N Fairview Ave c. 1895 Fairview Gardens General Plan List; 1990 Draft Update of Goleta
Land Use Plan; Santa
Barbara County Compiled
List; Architectural
Historical Survey of
Vernacular Homesteads in
the Goleta Valley, 1986
This evaluation is for the farmhouse on the
property. It appears eligible under local
Criterion 2(a) as a rare remnant example of
19th century residential development
associated with Goleta’s agricultural history. It
is one of only a few remaining properties
dating to the late 19
th century.
5S3
777
3 City of Goleta
Draft Historic Resources Inventory

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP
LINE
NO.

PHOTO APN STREET
NO.

DIR STREET NAME SUFFIX DATE HISTORIC NAME COMMON NAME PREVIOUSLY

IDENTIFIED
REASON FOR IDENTIFICATION 2021 STATUS
CODE
7 077-020-045 96 Glen Annie Rd c. 1860 Corona del Mar Bishop Ranch General Plan List Previously designated as a Santa Barbara County Place of Historic Merit prior to
January 1, 2021; therefore, it is automatically
eligible for local designation.
5S1
8 071-330-003 5444 Hollister Ave 1961 St. Raphael's Catholic Church
St. Raphael's Catholic
Church
General Plan List; Goleta
APN Eligible Parcels list;
Santa Barbara County
Compiled List
This evaluation is for the church and
classroom buildings on the property. These
two buildings appear eligible under local
Criterion 2(c) as good local examples of Mid-
century Modern ecclesiastical architecture.
5S3
9 071-330-009 5490 Hollister Ave 1880 Sexton, Joseph and Lucy Foster House
General Plan List Previously designated as Santa Barbara County Landmark #14 and listed in the
National Register of Historic Places prior to
January 1, 2021; therefore, it is automatically
eligible for local designation.
5S1
778
4 City of Goleta
Draft Historic Resources Inventory

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP
LINE
NO.

PHOTO APN STREET
NO.

DIR STREET NAME SUFFIX DATE HISTORIC NAME COMMON NAME PREVIOUSLY

IDENTIFIED
REASON FOR IDENTIFICATION 2021 STATUS
CODE
10 071-140-056 5555 Hollister Ave 1967 Hill Homestead Witness Tree; Blue Ox Steak House
Butler Event Center;
Sizzler Steak House
General Plan List; Goleta
APN Eligible Parcels list;
Santa Barbara County
Compiled List (Witness
tree); Historic Resources
Study: Goleta Old Town
Revitalization Plan, 1997
This building appears eligible under local
Criterion 2(a) as an example of post-World
War II commercial development,
representing increased development along
Hollister Avenue associated with significant
local growth in the postwar period.

Additionally, it appears eligible under local
Criterion 2(c) as a good and rare local
example of Googie architecture designed by
architect Louis Mazzetti.
5S3
11 071-130-009 5681 Hollister Ave 1926 Goleta Union School Goleta Valley Community Center
General Plan List; Goleta
APN Eligible Parcels list;
Santa Barbara County
Compiled List; Goleta
Community Center
Historic Resource
Evaluation Part I, 2016
The Goleta Union School building appears
eligible under Criterion A/1/2(a) as an
important example of the continued
institutional growth in Goleta during the
1920s. Additionally, the Goleta Union School
Building appears eligible under local Criterion
2(c) as an example of Mediterranean Revival
institutional architecture.

Page & Turnbull completed a Historic
Resources Assessment for this property in
2016, in which they concluded that the
Goleta Union School building is eligible for
listing in the National and California Registers
under Criterion A/1 for its role in the
development of Goleta’s education system as
well as in the growth of the town center; this
survey concurs with that finding and
additionally recommends it for local
eligibility.
3S/3CS/5S3
12 071-121-003 5757 Hollister Ave 1939 Earle Ovington plane hangar; Caterpillar Tractors
Santa Cruz Market General Plan List; Goleta
APN Eligible Parcels list;
Historic Resources Study:

Constructed in c. 1928 as an airplane hangar
by Earle Ovington, the first air mail pilot in
the United States, the building was relocated
to its present site from the Casa Loma
Airfield in Santa Barbara (now the municipal
golf course) in 1939.
5S3
779
5 City of Goleta
Draft Historic Resources Inventory

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP
LINE
NO.

PHOTO APN STREET
NO.

DIR STREET NAME SUFFIX DATE HISTORIC NAME COMMON NAME PREVIOUSLY

IDENTIFIED
REASON FOR IDENTIFICATION 2021 STATUS
CODE
13 071-061-013 5784 Hollister Ave 1932 Goleta Bakery General Plan List; Historic Resources Study: Goleta
Old Town Revitalization
Plan, 1997
This building appears eligible under local
Criterion 2(a) as an example of commercial
development from the 1930s, during a
period of continued growth and
development of the towns of La Goleta and
La Patera. It represents the continued
expansion of Hollister Avenue as Goleta's
primary commercial corridor during the
Great Depression.
5S3
14 071-053-014 5838 Hollister Ave c. 1930 Altamirano's Mexican Grill
General Plan List; Goleta
APN Eligible Parcels list;
Historic Resources Study:

Goleta Old Town
Revitalization Plan, 1997
This building appears eligible under local
Criterion 2(a) as an example of commercial
development from the 1930s, during a
period of continued growth and
development of the towns of La Goleta and
La Patera. It represents the continued
expansion of Hollister Avenue as Goleta's
primary commercial corridor during the
Great Depression.
5S3
15 073-610-001 6769 Hollister Ave 1957 Delco; GM Defense Research Laboratories;
Aerophysics Dev. Corp.;
Litton Industries
FLIR Thermal Imaging This evaluation is for the former primary building on the Delco campus at the
southwest corner of Hollister Avenue and
Coromar Drive. It appears eligible under
local Criterion 2(a) as an example of
industrial development associated with the
aerospace industry from the post-World War
II period, and for its association with Delco
Systems Operations. The campus has a
strong association with the aerospace
industry, which quickly became Goleta’s
dominant industry in the postwar period.

Delco Systems Operations made significant
contributions to aerospace industry and
influenced the postwar development of
Goleta.

Additionally, it appears eligible under local
Criterion 2(c) as a good example of Mid-
century Modern commercial/industrial
architecture designed by Howell, Arendt,
Mosher & Grant.

Other buildings on the former Delco campus
may also be eligible for this association. They
are not fully visible from the public right-of-
way; therefore, additional information is
needed to fully evaluate the campus.
5S3
780
6 City of Goleta
Draft Historic Resources Inventory

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP
LINE
NO.

PHOTO APN STREET
NO.

DIR STREET NAME SUFFIX DATE HISTORIC NAME COMMON NAME PREVIOUSLY

IDENTIFIED
REASON FOR IDENTIFICATION 2021 STATUS
CODE
16 079-210-059 7825 Hollister Ave 1927 Barnsdall-Rio Grande Gasoline Station
Barnsdall-Rio Grande
Gas Station
General Plan List Previously designated as Santa Barbara County Landmark #29 prior to January 1,
2021; therefore, it is automatically eligible for
local designation.
5S1
17 071-340-001 110 S Kellogg Ave 1914 Kellogg Ranch Kellogg Ranch & Condominiums
General Plan List; Goleta
APN Eligible Parcels list;
1990 Draft Update of
Goleta Land Use Plan;
Santa Barbara County
Compiled List; Historic
Resources Study: Goleta
Old Town Revitalization
Plan, 1997
This evaluation is for the single-family
residence on the property. It appears eligible
under local Criterion 2(a) as a remnant of the
original neighborhood that developed
adjacent to the commercial corridor between
La Goleta and La Patera. The early 20
th
century was a significant era in Goleta’s
development, laying the groundwork for the
surrounding area. Additionally, this property
was associated with the Kellogg family, which
made a significant impact on the early
development of Goleta.

The residence also appears eligible under
local Criterion 2(c) as good and rare local
example of a Craftsman bungalow. There are
relatively few intact examples of Craftsman
style residential architecture in Goleta from
this period.
5S3
18 073-010-005 26 S La Patera Ln 1944 Shrode Produce Co. (Goleta Tomato Packing
House); Goleta Lemon
Association packing house
Shrode Produce
Company
General Plan List Previously designated as Santa Barbara County Landmark #40 [partially demolished]
prior to January 1, 2021; therefore, it is
automatically eligible for local designation.

The Shrode Produce Company Building was
designated by the County of Santa Barbara in
1998. It was partially demolished in 2001;
the west end of the building was retained
and relocated on the site. This portion of the
building remains eligible as a historic packing
house.
5S1
781
7 City of Goleta
Draft Historic Resources Inventory

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP
LINE
NO.

PHOTO APN STREET
NO.

DIR STREET NAME SUFFIX DATE HISTORIC NAME COMMON NAME PREVIOUSLY

IDENTIFIED
REASON FOR IDENTIFICATION 2021 STATUS
CODE
19 073-050-034 33 S La Patera Ln 1850 Daniel Hill Adobe General Plan List Previously designated a Santa Barbara County Place of Historic Merit prior to
January 1, 2021; therefore, it is automatically
eligible for local designation.
5S1
20 077-210-059 300 N Los Carneros Rd 1901 Goleta Train Depot Goleta Train Depot; South Coast Railroad
Museum
General Plan List Previously designated Santa Barbara County Landmark #22 and listed in the National
Register of Historic Places prior to January 1,
2021; therefore, it is automatically eligible for
local designation.
5S1
21 077-160-057 304 N Los Carneros Rd 1872;
1880
Stow House; Stow Ranch;
Rancho La Patera
Stow House; Sexton
Museum; Stow Ranch
Outbuildings; Lake Los
Carneros Park
General Plan List Previously designated Santa Barbara County Landmark #6 and listed in the National
Register of Historic Places prior to January 1,
2021; therefore, it is automatically eligible for
local designation.
5S1
782
8 City of Goleta
Draft Historic Resources Inventory

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP
LINE
NO.

PHOTO APN STREET
NO.

DIR STREET NAME SUFFIX DATE HISTORIC NAME COMMON NAME PREVIOUSLY

IDENTIFIED
REASON FOR IDENTIFICATION 2021 STATUS
CODE
22 071-053-017 170 Magnolia Ave 1915 Ellwood Hotel Park Place General Plan List; Historic Resources Study: Goleta
Old Town Revitalization
Plan, 1997
This building appears eligible under local
Criterion 2(a) as a rare extant example of
early commercial development near the
original town center of La Patera. The early
20 th century was a significant era in Goleta’s
development, laying the groundwork for
future development of the area.

The Ellwood Hotel was established in 1915
to serve visitors to the growing commercial
corridor between La Patera and La Goleta; it
later catered to the growing number of
automobile tourists traveling along the
California coast.
5S3
23 071-061-015 170 Nectarine Ave c. 1920 This residence appears eligible under local Criterion 2(a) as a rare example of residential
development from the early 1920s. This is a
remnant of the original residential
neighborhood that developed adjacent to the
commercial corridor between the two towns
of La Goleta and La Patera. The early 20th
century was a significant era in Goleta’s
development, laying the groundwork for
future development of the area.
5S3
24 071-053-010 171 Nectarine Ave c. 1920 Camel Motor Court Camel Auto Court; College Motel
General Plan List; Goleta
APN Eligible Parcels list;
Historic Resources Study:

Goleta Old Town
Revitalization Plan, 1997
The Camel Motor Court appears eligible
under local Criterion 2(a) as a rare early
example of auto-related commercial
development in Goleta.

The Camel Motor Court was established c.
1920 alongside a gasoline station
(demolished). This early predecessor to the
motel represents a collection of modest
cabins designed to offer lodgings to auto
tourists traveling through Goleta along the
commercial thoroughfare of Hollister
Avenue.
5S3
783
9 City of Goleta
Draft Historic Resources Inventory

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP
LINE
NO.

PHOTO APN STREET
NO.

DIR STREET NAME SUFFIX DATE HISTORIC NAME COMMON NAME PREVIOUSLY

IDENTIFIED
REASON FOR IDENTIFICATION 2021 STATUS
CODE
25 071-220-036 5399 Overpass Rd 1887 Beck House Santa Barbara Humane Society
General Plan List; Goleta
APN Eligible Parcels list;
1990 Draft Update of
Goleta Land Use Plan
This evaluation is for the farmhouse on the
property. It appears eligible under local
Criterion 2(a) as one of the earliest remaining
residences in Goleta; and as a rare remaining
residence associated with the agricultural
industry.
5S3
26 071-102-005 195 S Patterson Ave c. 1925 Telephone Exchange Building
Pendulum Faire Clock
Shop
General Plan List; Goleta
APN Eligible Parcels list
This building appears eligible under local
Criterion 2(a) for its association with 1920s
infrastructure in Goleta. It is eligible under
Criterion 2(c) as a good local example of
Mediterranean Revival architecture.
5S3
27 073-050-015 130 Robin Hill Rd c. 1960 Edgerton, Germeshausen & Grier, Inc.; University
Research Park

This building appears eligible under local
Criterion 2(a) as an example of industrial
development associated with the aerospace
industry from the post-World War II period.

It has a strong association with the aerospace
industry, which quickly became Goleta’s
dominant industry in the postwar period.

Edgerton, Germeshausen & Grier, Inc. made
significant contributions to aerospace industry
and influenced the postwar development of
Goleta.

Additionally, the building appears eligible
under local Criterion 2(c) as a good local
example of Mid-century Modern industrial
architecture by Stice and Takayama
Associates, architects.
5S3
784
10 City of Goleta
Draft Historic Resources Inventory

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP
LINE
NO.

PHOTO APN STREET
NO.

DIR STREET NAME SUFFIX DATE HISTORIC NAME COMMON NAME PREVIOUSLY

IDENTIFIED
REASON FOR IDENTIFICATION 2021 STATUS
CODE
28 077-222-007 6260 Shamrock Ave 1930 This residence appears eligible under local Criterion 2(a) as a rare extant example of
residential development from the 1930s in
Goleta. This residence predates the
surrounding area by several decades and may
have a historic association with the
agriculture industry.
5S3
29 079-121-007 10 Winchester Cyn Rd 1959 The Timbers Restaurant and Shops
The Timbers General Plan List This building appears eligible under local Criterion 2(a) as an example of post-World
War II commercial development representing
increased development along the commercial
corridors associated with significant local
growth in the postwar period. It is the long-
term home of the legacy business The
Timbers Restaurant, which operated in
various forms at the building since its
construction in 1959 through 2004 and has
become a landmark in the community.
5S3

785

ATTACHMENT 6

Points of Historical Interest

786
City of Goleta
Draft Points of Historical Interest

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP

DRAFT POINTS OF HISTORICAL INTEREST
LINE
NO.

PHOTO APN STREET
NUMBER

DIR STREET NAME SUFFIX DATE HISTORIC NAME COMMON NAME PREVIOUSLY

IDENTIFIED
REASON FOR IDENTIFICATION 2021 STATUS
CODE
1 073-030-020 100 Baldwin Dr Southern Pacific Railroad General Plan List; County of Santa Barbara Place of
Historic Merit (Per Goleta
GIS; not included in County
list of designated properties)
The railroad cut at this property may
warrant special consideration in local
planning as for its association with
the railroad industry in Goleta.

Remnant engineered cut
representing the former site of a
portion of the Southern Pacific
Railroad; not individually eligible for
designation as a City of Goleta
Historic Landmark.
6L
2 079-210-042 7979 Hollister Ave c. 1966 Ellwood Onshore Oil and Gas Processing Facility
Ellwood Onshore Oil and
Gas Processing Facility
This property may warrant special
consideration in local planning as a
remnant example of oil-related
infrastructure associated with the
continuing importance of the oil
industry in Goleta in the post-World
War II era.

Remnant oil-related infrastructure;
not individually eligible for
designation as a City of Goleta
Historic Landmark.
6L
3 079-200-013 8301 Hollister Ave 1942 Site of Japanese attack on Goleta oil fields; Kate Den
Bell’s Cactus
Haskell’s Beach Goleta Historical Marker 3 This area may warrant special consideration in local planning for its
association with the Japanese attack
on Ellwood Mesa during World War
II.

This area is also the site of a cactus
plant. Local legend notes that Kate
Den Bell predicted that oil would be
struck at the site of the cactus.
6L
787
City of Goleta
Draft Points of Historical Interest

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP
LINE
NO.

PHOTO APN STREET
NUMBER

DIR STREET NAME SUFFIX DATE HISTORIC NAME COMMON NAME PREVIOUSLY

IDENTIFIED
REASON FOR IDENTIFICATION 2021 STATUS
CODE
4 073-780-046 Walking path along Glen Annie
Creek
The walking path at the perimeter of
this property may warrant special
consideration in local planning as for
its association with the railroad
industry in Goleta.

Walking path following the trail of a
former rail spur; not individually
eligible for designation as a City of
Goleta Historic Landmark.
6L

788

ATTACHMENT 7

ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES

DECISION TREE

789
Will the project result
in earth-disturbing
activities?
Is the project exempt
per 17.43.020(A)?
Is the project
considered non-
exempt development
per 17.43.020(B)?
Is the earth-disturbing
activity located within
a paved, developed,
or ornamental
landscaped area
(17.43.030(A))?
No further review is
needed. Proceed with
the identified review
process in Title 17 for
the project.

Prepare a Preliminary
Archaeological
Assessment (PAA) or
Extended Phase I
report.

Does the PAA reveal
that the proposed
area of disturbance
contains or partially
contains archeological
and/or tribal cultural
resources and/or is an
extended Phase I
report recommended
by a professional?
No further review for
archaeological and/or
tribal cultural
resources is needed.

Proceed with project
including a zoning
clearance per Title 17
(17.43.030(A)(a)).

Is the earth-disturbing
activity located in an
area (including depth)
that is not paved,
developed, or
ornamentally
landscaped, and/or is
an Extended Phase I
report recommended
by a professional?
Prepare a Phase I or
Extended Phase I
report.

Does the Phase
I/Extended Phase I
report reveal that the
proposed area of
earth disturbance
contains/potentially
contains
archaeological and/or
tribal cultural
resources?
The project is subject
to a minor Conditional
Use Permit (CUP) and
California
Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) review,
including Native
American consultation
as required.

Archaeological and Tribal Cultural Resources Ordinance
City of Goleta | Planning and Environmental Review Department 130 Cremona Drive, Suite B, Goleta, CA 93117 | (805) 961-7543 No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
790

ATTACHMENT 8

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION

791
To: Office of Planning and Research From: City of Goleta P.O. Box 3044, 1400 Tenth St. Rm. 212 130 Cremona Drive, Suite B Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 Goleta, CA 93117

X Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
County of Santa Barbara
105 E. Anapamu Street, Room 407
Santa Barbara, CA 93101

Subject: Filing of Notice of Exemption

Project Title: The Historic and Cultural Resource Ordinance and Resolution; Case No. 16-092-OA and Amendment to the Visual and Historic Resources Element of the City of Goleta’s General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan; Case No. 20-004-GPA

Project Applicant: City of Goleta

Project Location (Address and APN): No address or APN; Citywide

Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project:

Case No. 16-092-OA
The project is the adoption of Historic Resources and Archaeological and Tribal Cultural Ordinance and a R esolution adopting the Hist oric Context S tatement along with the designation of certain properties as Goleta Historic Landmarks and establishing a list of eligible properties that designatio n could be sought follow ing the process outlined in Chapter 17.33.

The Ordinance makes the following additions and amendments to Title 2, 12, and 17 of the Goleta Municipal Code:

1. Adds Chapter 2.15 to establish a Historic Preservation Commission including duties, responsibilities, membership make up etc.

2. Amends Chapter 12.13 to in clude failure t o maintain a historic resource as a nuisance.

3. Adds Chapter 17.33 establishing Historic Preservation regulations, pr ocess, and Historic Resources Inventory etc.

4. Adds Chapter 17.43 establishing Archaeological and Tribal Cultural Reso urces regulations and review process etc.

5. Amends Chapter 17.29 regarding Demolitions and Relocations to be reflective of the requirements of Chapter 17.33

6. Amends Chapter 17.50 to update the responsibilities of the City Council, the Design Review Board, the Planning and Environme ntal Review Director based on the requirements of Chapter s 17.33 and 17.43, and to add a H istoric Preservation Commission with responsibilities to the list of Review Authorities

7. Amends Chapter 17.73 to add additional terms and definitions as a result of th e new regulations

The purpose of the Ordinance and R esolution is to establish regulations and requirements to preserve and protect Historic Resources and Archaeologic al and Tribal Cultural Resources including subsurface resources within the City of Goleta.

792

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION (NOE)

2 Case No. 20-0004-GPA

Updates to four City of Goleta General Plan policies regarding landmark designation (VH

5.1), eligibility criteria (VH 5.2), alterations (VH 5.5) and demolition (VH 5.6) in order for the General Plan policies language to be more encompassing and general in nature.

Changes are proposed in order to ensure consistency between the General Plan and the Ordinance with the General Plan outlining City policy and the Ordinance enacting the regulations. None of the edits change the intent of what was originally adopted but are revised to reflect current be st practices and the adoption by the City of a Historic Resources Inventory.

For both cases, the beneficiaries of the project are the citizens of Goleta.

Name of Public Agency Approving the Project: City of Goleta

Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out the Project: Planning and Environmental Review Department

Exempt Status: (check one) -Case No. 16-092-OA
 Ministerial (Sec. 15268)
 Declared Emergency (Sec. 15269 (a))
 Emergency Project (Sec. 15269 (b) (c))
 Categorical Exemption: (Insert Type(s) and Section Number(s)) X Other Statutory Exemption: (Section 15183, Section 15061(b)(3) and Section §15378(b)(5))

Reason(s) why the project is exempt:

Pursuant to Public Resourc es Co de Secti on 2 1083.3 and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183, proje cts that are consistent with the development density of existing zoning, community plan, or General Plan policies for which an Environmental Impact Repor t (EI R) was c ertified shall be exempt from additional CEQA analysis except as may be necessary to deter mine whether there are project-specific significant effects that are peculiar to t he projec t o r site that would otherwise require additional CEQA review . There is no new substantial information indicating tha t the impa cts of the project will be more severe than described in the General Plan EIR when the Vi sual and Historic Resources Ele ment was adopted and there are no cumulative or off -site impacts from t he proposed p roject that were not addressed in the Gene ral Plan EIR. As such, the Ordinance is exempt f rom further CEQA review.

In addition, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3) an d §15378(b)(5), the proposed Ordinance does not qualify as a "project" for the purpo ses of CEQA because the Ordinance does not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. The amendments proposed do not, by themselves, have the potenti al to cau se a significant effect on the environment. Any subsequent dev elopment proj ect will be separately examined in accorda nce with CEQA. As such, the proposed Ordinance is exempt from CEQA review.

793

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION (NOE)

3 Exempt Status: (check one) – Case No. 20-0004-GPA
 Ministerial (Sec. 15268)
 Declared Emergency (Sec. 15269 (a))
 Emergency Project (Sec. 15269 (b) (c))
 Categorical Exemption: §15061(b)(3) and §15378

Reason(s) why the project is exempt:

It can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the General Plan Amendment would have potential for causing a significant effect on the environment given the nature of the project. Further the GPA would not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment as the project revise s the language of four existing General Plan policies, does not change the intent of the policies that are the subject of this amendment, and will not result in new development.

The City will continue to recogniz e the structures and sites listed in General Plan policy VH 5.1. as importan t historical resources along with those structures formally placed on the City’s Historic Resources Inventory. In addition, the City will continue to have policies regarding the establishment of eligibility criteria (VH 5.2), process and considerations fo r alteration proposals to historic resources (VH 5.5.), and process and range of alternatives and mitigations associated with demolition requests (VH 5.6) . Any subsequent requests that would be affected by the se Historic Resources policies would be subject to their own individual CEQA analysis.

City of Goleta Contact Person and Telephone Number: Current Planning Manager Lisa Prasse; 805-961-7542.

Signature Title Date

If filed by the applicant:

1. Attach certified document of exemption finding

2. Has a Notice of Exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes No

Date received for filing at OPR: _____________________________________________

Note: Authority cited: Section 21083 and 211110, Public Resources Code Reference: Sections 21108, 21152.1, Public Resources Code 794

ATTACHMENT 9

February 15, 2022 Power Point

795
City of Goleta
Historic Preservation
Program
City Council
April 5, 2022

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP
796
Comprehensive Preservation Program
• Implementation of Goals and Policies identified in the General Plan • Citywide Historic Context Statement (accepted by City Council, February 2019)
• Citywide Historic R
esources Survey & Initial Historic Resources
Inventory
• Regula
tions for the designation and protection of historic
tribal/cultural resources
in Goleta
• Proposed Chapter 17.33 Historic Resource Preservation • Proposed Chapter 17.43 Archaeological and Tribal Cultural Resources April 5, 2022 City Council 2
797
Historic Resource Preservation Ordinance
• Establishes:
• Historic Preservation Commission
• Historic Resources Inventory
• Processes for designating Historic Landmarks, Historic Districts, and Points of Historical Interest
• Processes f
or review of changes to historic resources
• Processes for amendment or recission
• Provides for use of the Mills Act Property Tax Abatement Program as an incentive for hist
oric preservation
April 5, 2022 City Council 3
798
Archaeological and Tribal Cultural Resources
Ordinance
• Establishes:
• Procedures for the preservation and protection of significant Archaeological and Tribal Cultural Resources
• Ex
empt and non-exempt criteria for review of proposed development • Site assessment and permit requirements for non-exempt development • Development standards for all permits issued under the Ordinance • Native American Communication protocols
• Confidential list/map of documented Archaeological and Tribal Cultural Resources
April 5, 2022 City Council 4
799
Planning Commission Review
• December 14, 2020: Review Draft Historic Preservation Provisions & Inventory
• March
29, 2021: Review Updates to Historic Preservation Provisions & Inventory
• June 21, 2021:

Review Draft Archaeological and Tribal Cultural
Resources Provisions
• August 23,
2021: Review Updates to Archaeological and Tribal Cultural Resources Provisions
• November
7, 2021: Review and Recommendation of full Ordinance,
Historic Context, and
Historic Resources Inventory
April 5, 2022 City Council 5
800
City Council Review
• December 7, 2021: City Council Commenced Review – Items Requested for Additional Inf
ormation:
• Archaeological and Tribal/Cultural Resources
• Fees for Required Reports
• Estimated Number of Projects that would be Affected
• Clarify Exemptions
• Historic Resources Preservation
• Potential Landmarks
• Bishop Ranch
April 5, 2022 City Council 6
801
April 5, 2022 City Council 7
Tonight’s Meeting
• Updates re: Historic Preservation and Archaeological and Tribal Cultural proposed R
egulations and requested at
December 2021 meeting
• Public hearing
• Consider evidence presented during public hearing
• If acceptable, adopt and/or introduce City Council
Resolutions
802
Archaeological Report Cost Estimates*
Cost A (PAA with
records search)
Cost B (PAA without
records search)
Cost C (Phase 1) Cost D (Extended
Phase 1)
Range of
estimates
$1,000-$5,500 $550-$5,700 $2,000-$6,510 $5,000-$11,000
Average of
estimates
$3,500 $3,000 $4,900 $8,500
City Consultant’s
Estimate
$1,500-$2,500 --- $2,500-$5,000 $5,000-$7,000
April 5, 2022 City Council 8
*Actual costs may differ on a case-by-case basis.
803
Ministerial Permits Involving Earth Disturbance
(January 2020-December 2021)
Permit Type Number
Additions 96
Foundations 10
Grading 25 (Feb.
2020-present)
Patio Covers 10
Sewer Lines 59
Swimming Pools 10 (July 2020-present)
Water Lines 42
TOTAL 252
April 5, 2022 City Council 9
2,260 total permits (plumbing, mechanical,
electrical, & building) issued over same time period.
804

17.43.020 Applicability
• Recommended Refinements to Section 17.43.020 proposed to exempt certain ground disturbing activities r
egardless of native or non-native
soils
• Improvements/work exempt from building permit requirements (i.e., fences, above ground pools, structures >120 sq. ft., sidewalk
s/driveways, swings etc.)
• Irrigation lines, landscaping, and footings for patio covers, and similar minor accessory improvements that reuse
previously excavated/disturbed areas
• 4 cubic feet: measured individually unless each disturbance occurs less than 8 feet apart
April 5, 2022 City Council 10
805
Findings: Proposed Landmarks
• Resolution adopting the Context Statement, establishing the Historic Resources Inven
tory, and adopting Goleta Landmarks has been
revised to add the requested findings.

April 5, 2022 City Council 11
806
Bishop Ranch Site Visit
• Staff contacted Bishop Ranch representatives twice regarding the request to conduct a site
visit. No response was received.
• As a result, no additional information was able to be gathered regarding extan
t buildings or features on the site.
• Bishop Ranch is included as a potential City Landmark, with the contributing featur
es as identified in the Santa Barbara County
designation.

April 5, 2022 City Council 12
807
Related Issues
• Archdiocese of Los Angeles:
• Letter sent requesting that 5444 Hollister Avenue (St. Raphael Catholic Church and classroom building) not be placed on the Historic Resour ces Inventory
• 5444 Hollister is identified as a potential City Landmark as a good local example of Mid-century Modern ecclesiastical ar
chitecture
April 5, 2022 City Council 13
808
Related Issues
• 295 (290) Ellwood Canyon Road
• Included on Study List; not recommended for inaugural Historic Resources Inventory
• Community is aw
are of change of ownership and has expressed interest
regarding historic
status and that of the “Ellwood Queen,” a large eucalyptus tree
April 5, 2022 City Council 14
809
295 (290) Ellwood Canyon Road
• 290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road contains:
• Barn (constructed prior to 1928)
• Single-family residence (constructed prior to 1938)
• Metal outbuilding (constructed prior to 1928)
• Metal outbuilding (constructed c. 1995)
• Metal outbuilding (constructed prior to 1938)
• Metal outbuilding (constructed c. 1955)
• Metal outbuilding (constructed c. 1955)
• Numerous temporary structures (greenhouses and sheds) • Several cultivated fields
• Numerous mature trees and shrubs
• “Ellwood Queen” believed to have been planted by Ellwood Cooper in 1887 April 5, 2022 City Council 15
810
295 (290) Ellwood Canyon Road
• Was not designated by the County of Santa Barbara
• Was not identified as historically significant in the General Plan • Additional information, including a site visit to view existing conditions on the property, would be necessary to comple
te an assessment of the
property
• More in-depth research into the property’s ownership history and the subdivision of the parcel is necessary to determine potential hist oric
significance and historic integrity
• Recommendation is to keep the property on the Study List pending additional information
• If Historic Resour
ces Preservation Ordinance is adopted, 295 Ellwood
Canyon Road could be nominat
ed for listing
April 5, 2022 City Council 16
811
Recommendation
It is recommended that after considering the evidence presented during the public hearing, the City Council:

A. Adopt City Council Resolution No. 22-___, entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Goleta, California, adopting the proposed General Plan Amendment to the Visual and Historic Resource Element of the General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan; Case No. 20-0004-GPA.

B. Introduce and conduct the first reading (by title only and waive further reading) of City Council Ordinance No. 22-___ entitled “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Goleta, California, adding Chapter 2.16, entitled Historic Preservation Commission, Chapter 17.33, entitled Historic Resource Preservation, Chapter 17.43, entitled Archaeological and Tribal Cultural Resources, and various Amendments to Titles 12 and 17 of the Goleta Municipal Code; Case No. 16-092OA.” C. Adopt City Council Resolution No. 22-___, entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Goleta, California, adopting the Historic Context Statement and designating the Historic Landmarks List and Historic Resource Inventory; Case No. 16-092OA.” April 5, 2022 City Council 17
812
City of Goleta
Historic Preservation
Program
City Council
April 5, 2022

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP
813

ATTACHMENT 10

December 7, 2021, City Council Report

814
1 CPMS Agenda Item TBD

PUBLIC HEARI PUBLIC HEARING ITEM
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021

TO: Mayor and Councilmembers

FROM: Peter Imhof, Planning and Environmental Review Director

CONTACT: Lisa Prasse, Current Planning Manager

SUBJECT: Historic Preservation and Archaeological and Tribal Cultural Ordinance; Case Number 16-092 OA; City Wide

RECOMMENDATION

After considering the evidence presented during the public hearing:

A. Adopt City Council Resolution No. 21 -___, entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Goleta, California, adopting the proposed General Plan Amendment to the Visual and Historic Resources Element of the General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan; Case No. 20-0004-GPA.

B. Introduce and conduct the first reading (by title only and waive further reading) of City Council Ordinance No. 21-__ entitled “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Goleta, California, adding Chapter 2.16, entitled Historic Preservation Commission, Chapter 17.33, entitled Historic Resource Preservation, Chapter 17.43, entitled Archaeological and Tribal Cultural Resources, and various Amendments to Tit les 12 and 17 of the Goleta Municipal Code; Case No. 16-092OA.”

C. Adopt Council Resolution No. 21-___, entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Goleta, California, adopting the Historic Context Statement and designating the Historic Landmarks List and Historic Resources Inventory; Case No. 16-092OA.”

BACKGROUND

Project Background

On June 21, 2016, the City Council approved a contract with Historic Resources Group (HRG) to assist staff with the development of a Historic Preservation program, including the development of a citywide context statement, a historic resources survey, and an ordinance. To assist with the work, Greenwood Associates (an archaeological firm) , Carlberg Associates (horticultural/registered consulting arborist fir m), and later Paleo Solutions, were included as part of the team.
815
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021

Page 2 of 18 ends

The development of a Context Statement was the first step in the process. A Context Statement is not a comprehensive history of the community but instead highlights the trends and patterns critical to the understanding of the setting of development within the appropriate historic, social, architectural and cultural resource context. The cultural resource context portion provides insights from the Barbareño Band of Chumash Indians along with input from the scientific community regarding the archaeological importance of Goleta. As the chapters of the Context Statement were completed, each was made available for public comment as follows:

Built Environment: September 2017
Archaeological Resources: November 2017
Tree and Landscape Study: November 2017
Planning Commission Review of Revised
Comprehensive Context Statement: January 2019
City Council Acceptance of
Context Statement: February 2019

The Context Statement was purposely not formally adopted at that time pending development of Eligibility Criteria (a component of the Ordinance). Following the Council acceptance of the Context Statement in February 2019, the Planning Commission held three workshops/study sessions (b etween April – June 2019) to provide staff with guidance regarding the topics to be covered in the Ordinance.

While HRG was able to prepare a draft ordinance following the Planning Commission workshops in the summer/fall of 2019, the assigned City staff for this project was diverted to the Vehicle Miles Traveled California Environmental Quality Act Threshold Project (VMT CEQA Thresholds). The VMT CEQA Threshold project took precedence as it had a firm deadline for implementation of July 1, 2020.

Information/materials regarding the Historic Preservation project are accessible on the City’s website at www.historicgoleta.org.

Planning Commission Review

Since December 2020, the Planning Commission has reviewed the regulations and associated documents provided in Attachments 2 and 3 over five meetings. On December 14, 2020, and March 29, 2021, the Planning Commission reviewed the materials related to Historic Resources and properties that could be design ated as Goleta Historic Landmarks and properties that could be placed on the Historic Resources Inventory for future designation consideration. On June 21, 2021, and August 23, 2021, the Planning Commission review ed the Archaeological and Tribal Cultural R esources provisions proposed to be adopted as Chapter 17.43. At each meeting, input was received from the Planning Commissioners and the public. Following each meeting, revisions were made in responses to the comments.

816
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021

Page 3 of 18 ends

On October 25, 2021, the Planning Commission was scheduled to review the Ordinance, but the scheduled hearing did not occur given the lateness of the hour. The Planning Commission continued the matter specifically to November 8, 2021, at which time the Commission reviewed the ordinance provisions comprehensively . After conducting the public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Ordinance (Attachment 2) and the Resolution adopting the Context Statement and the His toric Resources Inventory (Attachment 3).

Following the November 8 th meeting, staff has made a minor addition to Section

17.43.020(A) to add clarity relating to irrigation, landscaping and minor accessory uses as this was a topic of discussion . More detail regarding this change is discussed below under Chapter 17.43.

General Plan Amendment
As prepared, the draft Ordinance deviates from the specific wording of a few policies in the General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan (General Plan) Visual and Historic Res ources Element. This deviation is a result of how detailed and specific the adopted General Plan Policy language is. While the work done on the Ordinance has used the General Plan as the guiding document and fulfills its intent, minor changes to the specif ic language of a few General Plan policies were identified (VH 5.1, VH 5.2, VH 5.5, and VH 5.6). Given the differences (albeit minor), an amendment to the General Plan (GPA) was initiated by the City Council on April 4, 2021.

On June 14, 2021, the Planni ng Commission reviewed the proposed GPA and recommended Council adoption of the minor language change to the above referenced General Plan Policies. Planning Commission Resolution No. 21 -05 is provided as Attachment 4. In conformance with Senate Bill 18, letters were sent to seven tribal groups offering consultation on the proposed General Plan Amendment on May 2 1, 2021. The consultation period concluded on August 2 1, 2021, with no requests for consultation.

Attachment 1 is the Resolution adopting the General Plan Amendment.

JURISDICTION
Final action on the Ordinance Amendment and General Plan Amendment is the responsibility of the City Council (Subsection 17.50.030(A)). Chapters 17.66 (Amendments to Zoning Regulations and Zoning Maps ) and 17.67 (Amendments to the General Plan) require the Planning Commission to provide recommendations to the City Council on all proposed Ordinance Amendments and GPAs.

DISCUSSION

General Plan Amendment (Attachment 1)

As mentioned above, four General Plan policies have been identified for refinements.

None of the proposed revisions change the intent of the language that was adopted more than 15 years ago. The policies proposed for revisions are 1) landmark designation (VH 817
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021

Page 4 of 18 ends

5.1); 2) eligibility criteria (VH 5.2); 3) alterations (VH 5.5); and 4) demolition (VH 5.6). The changes are designed to have the General Plan policies language be more encompassing and general in nature.

These changes are needed in order to ensure consistency between the General Plan and the Ordinance, with the General Plan outlining City policy and the Ordinance enacting the regulations. The proposed policy revisions reflect current best practices and the City’s adoption of a Historic Resources Inventory discussed later in this r eport. Below are the proposed updates to the policies regarding landmark designation (VH 5.1), eligibility criteria (VH 5.2), alterations (VH 5.5) and demolition (VH 5.6) in underline/strikeout format so that the proposed changes are readily apparent.

General Plan Policy VH 5.1

Proposed Language:

Local Historic Landmarks . [GP] At the time of incorporation, the l Locally significant historic sites or structures that were designated as Landmarks by the County and the City upon its incorporation included: Stow House, Sexton House, Goleta Depot, Barnsdall-Rio Grande Gasoline Station, and the Shrode Produce Company Tomato Packing House. In 2006, locally significant historic sites or structures that were are designated as Places of Historic Merit included the Daniel Hill Adobe, a portion of the Southern Pacific Railroad (engineered cut representing the former site of a portion of the Southern Pacific Railroad), and Bishop Ranch. Stow House, Sexton House, and the Goleta Depot are listed in the National Register of Historic Places . There are no State Historic Landmarks in Goleta.

Table 6 -1 and Figure 6 -2 provide a summary of structures or sites that have been previously listed or are eligible for listing in one of these registers or inventories. The City will maintain a local list of historic resources, the Goleta Historic Resources Inventory, which includes the historic resources referenced in this policy, to ensure that local historic resources are protected and preserved.

Result:

The proposed chan ges update the policy to reflect the designation status of significant buildings and sites at the time of incorporation and adoption of the General Plan, eliminates Table 6-1 and Figure 6-2, and links the General Plan to the Historic Resources Inventory instead of Table 6-1 and Figure 6-2. The elimination of Table 6-1 and Figure 6- 2 will remove an inconsistency that would arise with the adoption of the Historic Resources Inventory by the City Council.

HRG has reviewed the information used to create Table 6-1 and Figure 6 -2 and conducted extensive field surveys to identify the properties proposed to be included in the Goleta Historic Resources Inventory. Many of the structures listed in Table 6-1 and Figure 6-2 have been incorporated into the Goleta Historic Resources Inventory: 1) if they meet the criteria established in the Context Statement; 2) if they had not been modified in the last 15-20 years; and 3) if character defining features were visible from the public right - of-way during the citywide survey.

818
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021

Page 5 of 18 ends

Lastly, as part of the Historic Preservation project all of the structures/improvements listed in policy VH 5.1 will either be designated a Goleta Historic Landmark (Barnsdall - Rio Grande Gas Station, Bishop Ranch, Goleta Depot, Hill Adobe, Sexton House, Shrode Packing House, and Stow House), or be placed on an Eligibility List as a Place of Historical Interest (Railroad Cut) , if the Council adopts the Resolution provided as Attachment 3.

General Plan Policy VH 5.2

Proposed Language:

Locally Significant Historic Resources [GP]. Structures or sites, including landscaping, have special historic, aesthetic, or cultural value to Goleta shall be designated as locally significant historic resources. A locally significant historic resource may include those reso urces listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register for Historic Places, State Historic Landmarks, or the Santa Barbara County Landmarks/Places of Historical Merit inventories, as well as resources designated by the City. The City shall establish use the following eligibility criteria including but not limited to age of the structure; exceptional importance in the community; significant contribution from a historical, architectural, social, cultural perspective; representation as a unique architectural style or workmanship; associat ion with an important historical event or person. Eligibility criteria will be used by the City Council when considering a site or structure, including landscaping, for designation as a locally significant historic resource.

a. It exemplifies or reflect special elements of the city’s cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, architectural, landscape architectural, or natural history. b. It is identified with person or events of local, state or national history. c. It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period, or method of construction or is an example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship. d. It represents works of a notable builder, designer, architect, or landscape architect. e. It includes a geographically definable area possessing a concentration of historic, prehistoric or scenic properties that are unified aesthetically. f. It has a location with unique physical characteristics, including landscaping, or is a view or vista representi ng an established visual feature of a neighborhood or community.
g. It embodies elements of design, detail, materials, or craftsmanship representing a significant structural, architectural or landscape architectural achievement. h. It reflects significant geogr aphical patterns associated with different eras of settlement and growth.
i. It is one of a few remaining examples possessing distinguishing characteristics of an architectural, landscape architectural, or historical type. j. It includes rare or specimen plant materials associated with a particular period or style of landscape history.

Result:

This change directs the City to establish eligibility criteria as a policy without being overly specific. This change reflects that it is the policy of the City to establish eligibility criteria 819
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021

Page 6 of 18 ends

and then have these criteria adopted as regulation. The eligi bility criteria are a key component of the Ordinance and have been incorporated directly into Chapter 17.33.

The list of criteria in the General Plan was used to create the designation criteria in the Ordinance. However, some have been consolidated to align with National and California Register designation criteria thereby providing more clarity for property owners, particularly when environmental review may be triggered.

General Plan Policy VH 5.5

Proposed Language:

Alterations to Historic Resources. [GP] Any proposed alterations to historic resource shall be subject to a Phase 1 and/or Phase 2 historical study . Any proposed alterations to a designated historic resource or property listed in the City’s Historic Resources Inventory deemed acceptable that may affect the historical integrity of a historical site or structure shall respect the character- defining features of the building, and its setting, and maintain architectural consistency with the original site or structure. Such proposals may require the submittal of an historic evaluation from a recognized professional as part of the design review process, from a cultural resource professional that, depending upon the nature of the proposed alternation, may include review by the Historic Preservation Commission or landmarks commission and/or design review Design Review Board prior to approval. To encourage rehabilitation, maintenance, and sensitivity in additions and remodels, the City encourages and shall supports adaptive reuse of structures listed on the Historic Resources Inventory historic sites and structures and may consider allowing for flexibility when applying building code zoning regulations, including use of the California Historic Building Code, in order to facilitate the retention of character -defining features and that retain or promote the maintaining historical significance.

Result:

The proposed language modifies the policy to reflect in general terms what is proposed in the Ordinance while maintaining the emphasis on compatibility, review process, and adaptive reuse.

General Plan Policy VH 5.6

Proposed Language:

Demolition of His toric Structures [GP] The City strives to prevent the demolition of structures listed on the Historic Resources Inventory. If demolition is proposed, the property owner must demonstrate that all efforts have been made to relocate or adaptively reuse the st ructure including but not limited to the submittal of a historic evaluation, a costs analysis, and a structural evaluation of the property justifying the demolition request.

Structures proposed for demolition shall be subject to a Phase 1 and/or Phase 2 historical study. If a structure or site is determined important to the city’s heritage, preservation or relocation shall pursued before demolition. In the event the City determines that adaptive reuse on site preservation or relocation is not feasible, demolition is deemed acceptable, appropriate mitigation and documentation measures must be undertaken by the applicant. the Phase 1 and/or Phase 2 historical study shall identify appropriate mitigation 820
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021

Page 7 of 18 ends

measures, which Such measures that may be required of the applicant, include but not be limited to the following:
a. Offering the structure for relocation and p. Providing public notice of the availability of the structure through advertisements or other means. b. Salvage and reuse building elements that have val ue and may be irreplaceable such as cornices, columns, mantels, doors, hardware, and lighting fixtures. c. Prepare written and photographic/ video-graphic documentation of the structure in archival quality format for retention by the City or designated Histo rical Archive before demolition or relocation. The Video- and-photo-document the structure and its setting using archival quality materials.

Result
The proposed language modifies the policy to reflect what is proposed in general terms in the Ordinance wh ile maintaining the emphasis on adaptive reuse, relocation, and documentation if demolition is allowed. It also provides additional language to discourage demolition and encourages adaptive reuse or relocation over demolition and more clearly expresses the City’s position that demolitions are discouraged.

Ordinance (Attachment 2)

Attachment 2 to the staff report is the proposed Ordinance that proposed additions and amendments to Titles 2, 12, and 17 of the Goleta Municipal Code as follows:

1. Chapter 2.16 to add duties, responsibilities, and member makeup of the Historic Preservation Commission

2. Chapter 12.13 to add Section 12.13.030Q to include failure to maintain a historic resource as a nuisance.

3. Chapter 17.33 establishing Historic Preservation regulations, process, and Historic Resources Inventory, etc.

4. Chapter 17.43 establishing Archaeological and Tribal Cultural Resources regulations and review process, etc.

5. Chapter 17.29 regarding Demolitions and Relocations to be reflective of the requirements of Chapter 17.33

6. Chapter 17.50 to update the responsibilities of the City Council, the Design Review Board, the Planning and Environmental Review Director, and to add a Historic Preservation Commission with responsibilities to the list of Review Authorities

7. Chapter 17.73 to add additional terms and definitions to conform with the above new regulations

Chapter 17.33. Historic Preservation

The purpose of Chapter 17.33 is to recognize and preserve historic resources that reflect the social, cultural, histo rical, and architectural heritage of Goleta by establishing procedures and regulation s. As proposed, a building, structure, object, or site is considered an Historic Resource in the City of Goleta , if it: a) is identified as potentially eligible for designation through a historic resources survey or other evaluation conducted by a Qualified Historic Preservation Professional using accepted professional practices and formally adopted for inclusion on the Historic Resources Inventory by the City 821
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021

Page 8 of 18 ends

Council; b) is listed in or formally determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places or the California Register of Historical Resources; c) is a designated County of Santa Barbara Landmark or County of Santa Barbara Place of Historic Merit; and d) is a designated City of Goleta Historic Landmark or Contributor to a locally designated Historic District.

Further, the proposed ordinance establishes three categories of designations, namely, Historic Landmark, Historic District, and Points of Historical Interest. Any potential Historic Resource, or any property that meets at least one of the criteria for designation , can be nominated for official designation as a local Historic Landmark or Historic District . The category of Points of Historical Interest would recognize buildings, structures, objects, or sites that do not meet the criteria for designation as a Historic Landmark or Historic District, but have particular social, cultural, or historic significance to the community and therefore may receive recognition and consideration in local planning. Designated Historic Landmarks and Contributors to designated Historic Districts are eligible for special protection and incentives that non-designated Historic Resources do not receive.

As provided for in the Ordinance, any property in the City of Goleta listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register of Historical Resources, or as a County of Santa Barbara Landmark or Place of Historic Merit as of January 1, 2021, will be automatically designated a local City of Goleta Historic Landmark as discussed later in this report.

Criteria and Designation Process

Each designation category would have differing criteria based on the nature of the category. The maximum time for the Historic designation process would be 180 days from the date the application was deemed complete.

Historic Landmark

For a Historic Landmark designation, a building, structure, object, or site may be designated as a City of Golet a Historic Landmark , if it is at least 50 years old (the age criteria may be waived and if it can be demonstrated that the potential resource exhibits exceptional importance) and meets one or more of the criteria outlined in Section

17.33.040. Further, the resource must retain sufficient historic integrity to convey its significance. There are seven aspects of integrity 1 defined by the National Park Service:
location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. A proposed Historic Landmark would not need to retain all seven aspects of integrity in order to be eligible for historic designation; however, it must retain those aspects of integrity that convey the reason for its significance.

The designation process is found in Section 17.33.040(B). Nominations for Historic Landmark designation may be initiated by any resident of the City of Goleta. If the person nominating the property is not the property owner, then the City would advise the property

1 The same definition of integrity is used throughout for the designation criteria and will not be defined with each category.
822
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021

Page 9 of 18 ends

owner of the nomination request within ten calendar days. Once the application is deemed to be complete, then the City would schedule the nomination for review by the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC). The HPC would then make a recommendation to the City Council as to the merits of the de signation request. The City Council at a notice d public hearing would determine if a property should be designated as a Goleta Historic Landmark.

Historic District

In regard to designating a group of buildings as a Historic District, such b uildings, structures, objects, or sites must relate to each other in a distinguishable way or in a geographically definable area. An area may qualify as a Historic District, if it meets one or more of the eligibility criteria in 17.33.060(A), retains suffi cient historic integrity to convey its significance, and:

1) It possesses a significant concentration, linkage, or continuity of sites, buildings, structures, or objects united historically or aesthetically by plan or physical development; and
2) A minimum of 60% of the sites, buildings, structures, or objects within the proposed historic district contribute to the district’s significance.

A proposed Historic District does not need to retain all seven aspects of integrity in order to be eligible for historic designation; however, it must collectively retain those aspects of integrity that convey the reason for its significance. The designation process is found in Section 17.33.080 (D). Nominations for Historic Landmark designation may be initiated by any reside nt of the City of Goleta. The nomination must include documentation, by letter or petition, that 51% of the property owners within the proposed district support the nomination (Section 17.33.0 60(C)(2). The rest of the nomination process is identical to that of the Historic Landmark category , with the City Council making the determination after receiving a recommendation from the HPC.

Points of Historical Interest

Section 17.33.070 provides the criteria and process for designating a Point of Historical Interest. A building, structure, object, or site can be designated a Point of Historical Interest in the City of Goleta, if it lacks integrity or otherwise does not meet the criteria for designation as a Historic Landmark but it is significant locally for its association with historic events, important persons, or has other cultural or historic importance to the community. The designation of Point of Historical Interest may be approved by the City Council upon the recommendation of the HPC.

A building, structure, object, or site may be designated as a Point of Historical Interest, if it meets at least one of the following criteria:

1) It is the site of a building, structure, or object that no longer exists but was associated with historic events or important persons, or otherwise has significant cultural or historic significance.
823
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021

Page 10 of 18 ends

2) It is the site of a historic event which has no distingui shable physical characteristics.

The designation of a Point of Historical Interest is solely honorary and is not listed in the Inventory. A Point of Historical Interest is not considered a Historic Resource under this ordinance or for purposes of CEQA and is therefore not afforded the same protections or incentives as Historic Resources.

Historic Preservation Commission and Review Process

As part of this Ordinance, a Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) would be established to act as an advisory body to the City Council and other Reviewing Authorities on all matters pertaining to historic preservation. The creation of an HPC would implement General Plan Implementation Measure VH-IA-4. The makeup and meeting requirements would be located in Chapter 2.15 of the Goleta Municipal Code and the duties and responsibilities would be located in Section 17.50.080 of the Goleta Municipal Code. The HPC would have five (5) members who have expertise, knowledge, or special interest in historic preservation and/or archaeological/cultural resources or are a member of a local Chumash Tribal group.

It is proposed that t he HPC would be an advisory board to the City Council, Planning Commission, Design Review Board, City Manager, and all City departments on all matters related to historic preservation . The HPC would make recommendations to the City Council regarding the appropriateness of designations, rescissions, amendments to designations, and Mills Act Contract requests . In addition, the HPC would make recommendations to the DRB on the appropriateness of any proposed alterations/ additions to properties listed in the Historic Resources Inventory . The existing DRB process would be followed except those alterations/additions to properties listed in the Historic Resources Inventory would be required to seek a recommendation from the HPC before the matter is reviewed by the DRB.

Once a property is designated as a historic resource, it would be subject to the process, standards and criteria outlined in Section 17.33.080. Alterations that are exempt from review under 17.58 that do not affect identified character -defining features would be exempt from DRB Review. Alterations that could affect character-defining features would be subject to DRB review. All proposed alterations would be required to meet the findings of either Section 17.33.080(C) or (D) depending on the Review Authority.

Amendments, Rescissions, and Demolitions

Section 17.33.050 outlines the process and criteria to remove or change the historic designation of a property. The process is essentially the same as the designation process.

As proposed, it would be up to the City Council, upon recommendation from the HPC, to amend or remove a designation based on meeting certain criteria ( e.g., damage to the structure, new information, etc.).

824
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021

Page 11 of 18 ends

In regard to demolition requests for historic resources, such a request would be subject to approval of a Major Conditional Use Permit including California Environmental Quality Act (Section 17.33.090). The impacts of the potential demolition would be analyzed either through a Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report at the property owners’/applicants’ cost. The applicant would be required to provide a cost analysis for the rehabilitation and reuse of the property and a report by a structural engineer on the feasibility of relocation. Further, if the property is more than 50 years old but is not listed on the Historic Resources Inventory, the PER Director may require a historic resources assessment report prepared by a Qualified Preservation Professional to determine whether it should be treated as a historic resource.

Mills Act Incentive and Maintenance of Historic Resource

Section 17.33.110 provides for the use of Mill Act as a tool to encourage preservation of designated historic resources. The Mills Act Property Tax Abatement Program (Mills Act) was enacted in 1972 by the State of California (Government Code Sections 50280-50290) and grants participating l ocal governments the authority to enter into contracts with owners of qualified historic properties, who actively participate in the repair, rehabilitation, restoration, and maintenance of the properties to receive property tax relief . If the City Council agrees to this preservation tool, then owners of properties designated as either a Historic Landmark and/or contributor to a designated Historic District may apply to enter into a Mills Act Contract. Mills Act contracts are typically for a rolling 10-year period. The benefit to the property owner is that they receive a reduction in property taxes in order to properly repair, restore, and maintain the historic resource. Given the potential financial impacts on the City in the reduction in property taxes, the City can determine on an annual basis how many contracts it will accept and can set a financial cap for the program.

Section 17.33.120 outlines the standards necessary to preserve, protect, and perpetuate the elements of the historic fabric unique to historic resources and to prevent the need for demolition or destruction due to neglect of important resources in the City’s history. This portion of the Ordinance requires that historic resources be maintained in good repair and be kept in a watertight condition to preclude decay problems.

In addition to any other Code Compliance penalty the City has , failure to maintain a historic resource as outlined in the Ordinance shall constitute a public nuisance, which, if not addressed, entitles the City to cause the maintenance to be performed at the Owner's expense. The goal of these provisions is to prevent/minimize demolition by neglect.

Lastly, economic hardship has been built into both the Demolition (Section 17.33.0 90) and Maintenance (Section 17.33.1 20) s ections as a potential consideration for such requests.

Chapter 17.43. Cultural Resources

The purpose of Chapter 17.43 is to establish standards for new development that could impact sensitive and protected Archaeological and/or Tribal Cultural Resources (Resources). Specifically, this Chapter is intended to:

825
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021

Page 12 of 18 ends

 Preserve and protect Archaeological and/or Tribal Cultural Resources  Foster awareness, recognition, and stewardship of the City’s Archaeological and/or Tribal Cultural Resources; and
 Protect, restore, and enhance significant Archaeological and/or Tribal Cultural Resources.

All new development (ministerial or discretionary) that requires earth-disturbing activities shall be subject to the regulations and reporting requirements.

Assessments and Permit Requirements (17.43.020 and 17.43.030)

The focus on when review of earth -disturbing activities will occur is proposed based on whether the area of disturbance is native soil ( i.e., not subject to previous grading).

Section 17.43.020 (A) outlines the list of activities that would be exempt from the requirements of Chapter 17.43. These include disturbance of four cubic feet or less of native soils, activities that will not disturb native soils (i.e., agricultural operations in areas already used for crop cultivation, city infrastructure that does not go beyond the footprint of the existing facility, etc.), interior alterations to existing structures, emergency projects, or areas that have already had an Archaeological Assessment or Phas e 1 Report prepared and the area has little to no potential to contain subsurface Resources.

As stated above, following the November 8 th Planning Commission meeting, staff has added Section 17.43.020(A) (2)(d) to the ordinance in order to add clarity that minor landscaping and footings could be exempt. The proposed language for

17.43.020(A)(2)(d) is as follows:

Landscaping and footings for fences, patio covers, and similar minor accessory improvements.

The purpose of this addition is to make it clear th at minor ground-disturbing activities in already disturbed area s would be exempt , which the Planning Commission supported .

The proposed addition is shown in redline on page 17 of the Ordinance.

If an activity is not found to be exempt, then the site will need to undergo an Archaeological Assessment by a Qualified professional as provided for in Section

17.43.030. The level of assessment (Preliminary Archaeological Assessment (PAA), a Phase 1 Report or an Extended Phase 1 Report) will based upon the e xisting nature of the site and the judgment of the qualified professional . If the PAA or Phase 1 report determines that the area of proposed earth-disturbing activities has little to no potential to contain subsurface Resources, then a Zone Clearance can b e issued for this aspect of the project . If the PAA or Phase 1 reveals that the area of earth -disturbing activities contains or potentially contains Resources, then the project would be subject to a Minor Conditional Use Permit. If an Extended Phase 1 report has been required, then the project is subject to a Minor Conditional Use Permit as well. Attachment 7 is provided as a visual representation of the process of a decision tree flow chart regarding archaeological and Tribal Cultural Resources. This attachment will become a handout which will be refined prior to implementation.
826
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021

Page 13 of 18 ends

Development Standards and Native American Communication (17.43.040 and

17.43.050)

Section 17.43.040 outlines the development standards (i.e., stop work if unexpected resources or human burials are encountered, provision of on-site monitors as appropriate, etc.) that would be applied to permits . The purpose of these standards is to provide another layer of protection to subsurface Resources.

As outlined in Section 17. 43.050, t he City shall consult with California Native American tribes in accordance with State law (Public Resources Code § 21080.3.1). In addition, for all properties for which a P AA or Phase I Report is prepared, the City will make these studies available to the Native American Tribal Council groups upon request.

City Projects and additions to the PER Director responsibilities

City projects (including Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects) are developed based on General Plan policies, adopted standards , and are subject to California Environmental Quality Act review. Where the review of City projects differs from private projects is that City projects are not subject to a permit for development in most cases in accordance with Section 17.53.020(X). The only City projects that are required to obtain a zoning permit are those that involve new development (not maintenance) in the Coastal Zone and development in ESHA in the Inland areas . While City projects do not have to obtain a zoning permit, the same public policy and environmental issues associated with a City project are vetted through the City Council.

Just like private development, City projects are exempt only if they do not disturb more than 4 cubic feet of native soils and if earth disturbance is done within the existing footprint of the facility. This could involve maintenance, repair or replacement of existing roadways, stormwater facilities, and buildings, where native soils are not disturbed. However, an exception to this rule exists when t he City project is an emergency project that is undertaken to mitigate the loss of or damage to life, property or essential services after a flood, earthquake, or other disaster pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21060.3.

While not part of Chapter 17.43, Section 17.50.060 will amend the duties of the Planning and Environmental Review Director to include the development of a list of sites with known archaeological, cultural, or pre -historic resource in consultation with the Tribal Chairs of the Barba reño, Coastal, Santa Ynez , and Ventureño Bands of Chumash Indians. This list shall be kept confidential and is not a public record under the Public Records Act. (Government Code Sections 6254(r) and 6254.10). This list will be used by the City to advise permit applicants regarding Resources, as appropriate.

Associated Title 12 and 17 Amendments

In addition to the inclusion of Chapters 17.33 and 17.43 to the Goleta Municipal Code, amendments to other sections are proposed to reflect the requirements set forth in these 827
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021

Page 14 of 18 ends

new Chapters and to strive for internal consistency and clarity within Title 12 and 17.

These additional changes are as follows:

1. Revision to Chapter 12.13 to add Section 12.13.030 (Q) to include failure to maintain a historic resource as a nuisance.

2. Revision to Chapter 17.29 regarding Demolition and Relocation provisions. This Chapter has been amended to clarify language regarding process and to ensure compatibility with the demolition provisions in Chapter 17.33.

3. Revision to Chapter 17.50:
a) To include the designation of properties as a Historic Landmark, Historic District, or Point of Historical Interest and approval of Mills Act Contracts as part of the City Council’s role and responsibilities.
b) To specify DRB’s role and responsibilities in reviewing alterations proposed to historic resources.
c) To add roles and responsibilities of the Historic Preservation Commission to the list of Reviewing Authorities
d) To add additional responsibilities to the Di rector of Planning and Environmental Review regarding the implementation of the Historic Preservation and Archaeological and Tribal Cultural Resources as noted above.

4. Revisions to Chapter 17.73 to add terms and definitions associated with Historic Preservation and Archaeological and Tribal Cultural Resources as used within Chapters 17.33. and 17.43.

Context Statement, Historic Resources Inventory, and Historic Landmarks (Attachment 3)

Attachment 3 is the Council Resolution that:
 Adopts the Context Statement (Exhibit A).
 Designates seven properties as Goleta Historic Landmarks; and  Establishes the Historic Resources Inventory.

Context Statement

As the City Council is aware, the City spent more than two years on the development of the Historic Context Statement, which covers the built environment (Historic Resources), archaeological resources (Cultural Resources), and trees a nd landscapes. The Archaeological Resource Chapter was developed in conjunction with the Barbareño Band of Chumash Indians (BBCI), whose words grace the document. The BBCI thoughts and stories set the tone for the significance of the land and the need to be mindful of cultural resources that may not be readily visible and have been overlooked in the past. The Context Statement has been used as the guiding document in the preparation of the Historic Resources Inventory and the proposed regulations. The eligibility criteria found in each of the Sections establishing designation status (please refer to Sections 828
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021

Page 15 of 18 ends

17.33.070, 17.33.080, 17.33.100 and 17.33.110) have been incorporated into Appendix A of the Context Statement.

Historic Resources Inventory

Through the review process with the Planning Commission , the Historic Resources Inventory has been refined to comprise 29 properties – seven of which have already been designated by the County of Santa Barbara or are listed in the National Register of Historic Places. With this refinement, the initial Historic Resources Inventory focuses on the most representative properties of the time periods and/or architectural styles identified in the Context Statement.

Some of the properties that were removed from the draft Historic Resources Inventory were not fully visible from the public right-of-way, so that a complete assessment of their character-defining features was not able to be made; others do not represent unique or excellent examples of their time period and some properties have been altered. It should be noted that removal from the initial Historic Resources Inventory would not preclude a property from being added to the Inventory in the future.

It is proposed that the existing properties that were already listed in the National Register of Historic Places or the California Register of Historical Resources or were pre viously designated by the County of Santa Barbara as of January 1, 2021, be automatically designated as a City Landmark. These buildings are:

1. Barnsdall-Rio Grande Gasoline Station, located at 7825 Hollister Avenue

2. Bishop Ranch, located at 96 Glen Annie Road

3. Daniel Hill Adobe, located at 33 S. La Patera Road

4. Goleta Depot, located at 300 N. Los Carneros Road

5. Sexton House, located at 5490 Hollister Avenue

6. Shrode Produce Packing House, located at 265 La Patera (partially demolished)

7. Stow House, located at 304 N. Los Carneros Road

All other individual properties that are identified as potentially eligible for designation would have to undergo the designation process to be formally designated as a landmark if/when an application for such designation is submi tted to the City for consideration .

Properties on the Historic Resources Inventory that have not been formally designated would not be eligible for preservation incentives (i.e., Mills Act property tax reduction) outlined in the Chapter 17.33, until such time as they are designated. These properties/structures would, however, be subject to other review processes in 17.33 and California Environmental Quality Act review, if changes were proposed. For the ease of the public’s and Commissioners’ review, Attachment 5 is the proposed initial City of Goleta Historic Resources Inventory list.

Most of the properties that are either proposed to be recognized as a Goleta Landmark or are eligible to be recognized as such are already identified as Historic Resources in Table 6-1 of the City of Goleta General Plan. There are a few additional properties based on the length of time that has passed or represent architectural style s that were not 829
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021

Page 16 of 18 ends

identified 15 years ago when the General Plan was under development. Lastly, Attachment 6 is a draft of the list of Points of Historical Interest for consideration.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT REVIEW

Attachment 1 - General Plan Amendment

The proposed GPA project is categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000 et seq.; “CEQA”) and CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. §§ 15000 et seq.). Specifically, the project is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to the following CEQA Guidelines:
 No possibility of significant effect [Section 15061(b)(3)]  Not a project [Section 15378]
It can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the General Plan Amendment would have potential for causing a significant effect on the environment given the nature of the project. Further the GPA would not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment as the project revises the language of four existing General Plan policies, does not change the intent of the policies that are the subject of this amendment, and will not result in new development.

The City will continue to recognize the structures and sites listed in General Plan policy VH 5.1. as important historical resources along with those structures formally placed on the City’s Historic Resources Inventory. In addition, the City will continue to have policies regarding the establishment of eligibility criteria (VH 5.2), process and considerations for alteration proposals to historic resources (VH 5.5.), and process and range of alternatives and mitigations associated with demolition requests (VH 5.6) . Any subsequent requests that would be affected by these Historic Resources policies would be subject to their own individual CEQA analysis.

Attachments 2 and 3 – Ordinance and the Context Statement Resolution

Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21 083.3 and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183, projects that are consistent with the development density of existing zoning, community plan, or General Plan policies for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certif ied, shall be exempt from additional CEQA analysis except as may be necessary to determine whether there are project-specific significant effects that are peculiar to the project or site that would otherwise require additional CEQA review. There is no new substantial information indicating that the impacts of the project will be more severe than described in the General Plan EIR when the Visual and Historic Resources Element was adopted and there are no cumulative or off-site impacts from the proposed proje ct that were not addressed in the General Plan EIR. As such, the Ordinance is exempt from further CEQA review.

In addition, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3) and 15378(b)(5), the proposed Ordinance does not qualify as a "project" for the pu rposes of CEQA because 830
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021

Page 17 of 18 ends

the Ordinance does not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.

The amendments proposed do not, by themselves, have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Any subsequent development p roject will be separately examined in accordance with CEQA. As such, the adoption of the documents related to the Historic Preservation and Cultural Resource Ordinance are exempt from CEQA review.

A draft of the proposed Notice of Exemption is provided as Attachment 8.

FISCAL IMPACTS:

As of November 9, 2021, $159,206 has been spent of the $201,350 appropriation associated with this project (Account Number 101 -40-4100-51209). There is no new appropriation needed to complete this project.

PUBLIC NOTICE

Notice of this public hearing has been provided in the following manner:
 An advertisement was published in the Santa Barbara Independent in both English and Spanish on November 24, 2021.
 On November 23, 2021, mailed notice was provided to property owners whose property could be placed on the Historic Resources Inventory and to those who have requested mailing for Citywide projects.
 On November 23, 2021, a) Gov Delivery email notice was sent to approximately 8600 emails addresses on the News and Announcements, City Council meetings, Historic Preservation, Interested Parties, and Spanish lists; and b) and the information was shared on various social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, etc.).

ALTERNATIVES:

The alternatives are 1) continue the matter for additional information/revision. If additional work is needed, an additional budget allocation may be needed ; 2) not adopt the proposed Ordinance and General Plan Amendment; or 3) approve the General Plan Amendment and not adopt the Ordinance.

Reviewed By: Legal Review By: Approved By:

___________________ ___________________ _________________ Kristine Schmidt Megan Garibaldi Michelle Greene
Assistant City Manager City Attorney City Manager

831
Meeting Date: December 7, 2021

Page 18 of 18 ends

ATTACHMENTS:

1. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Goleta, California, adopting the proposed General Plan Amendment to the Visual and Historic Resources Element of the General Plan/Coastal Land Use Plan; Case No. 20-0004-GPA

2. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City Of Goleta, California, adding Chapter

2.16, entitled Historic Preservation Commission, Chapter 17.33, entitled Historic Resource Preservation, Chapter 17.43, entitled Archaeological And Tribal Cultural Resources, and various Amendments to Titles 12 and 17 of the Goleta Municipal Code; Case No. 16-092OA

3. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Goleta, California, adopting the Historic Context Statement and designating the Historic Landmarks List and Histo ric Resources Inventory; Case No. 16-092

4. Planning Commission Resolution 21 -05 regarding the General Plan Amendment

5. Historic Resources Inventory

6. Points of Historical Interest

7. Draft Archaeological and Tribal Cultural Resources Decision Tree/Flow Chart

8. Notice of Exemption

9. Power Point Presentation

832

ATTACHMENT 11

HRG Memo regarding 290(295) Ellwood Canyon Road Property

833

MEMO
290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road, Goleta

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP
1 To: City of Goleta, Planning and
Environmental Review
Attn: Lisa Prasse
Date: January 12, 2022

This memo presents the research conducted by the survey team into the property at 290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road (shown in the Location Map in Figure 1). The property at 290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road was not included on the list of historic resources prepared as part of the City of Goleta General Plan, it has not been formally evaluated as a potential historic resource, and it was not recognized as a County of Santa Barbara Landmark or Place of Historic Merit. The property was part of the “ Windshield Survey of Farm Properties:

Unincorporated Areas of Goleta Valley,” conducted in 2003, as “a visible example of existing working barns and farmhouses in this part of the Goleta Valley that date to the late 19th and early 20th centuries.”1 However, that survey did not formally evaluate properties for potential eligibility for historic designation, and no California Historical Resources Status Codes were assigned. In addition, the survey report notes:

The top twenty percent of the surveyed resources that retain integrity of location, design, and craftsmanship and possess distinguishing characteristics of an architectural and historical type of farming traditions throughout the unincorporated area of the Goleta Valley are divided into two groups. The first group is composed of farm buildings that are located on five -to-ten a cre parcels within the urban boundary of the survey area. The second group contains the larger co mmercial ranches that lie in the rural agriculturally zoned areas. 290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road was not included in the list of the top twenty percent of surveyed resources by that study.

1 Santa Barbara County Historic Landmarks Advisory Commission, “Windshield Survey of Farm Properties: Unincorporated Areas of Goleta Valley,” prepared by Fermina B. Murray, Consultant Historian, June 20, 2003 . 834

MEMO
290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road, Goleta

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP
2 290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road was reviewed as part of the current Citywide Historic Resources Survey. Based on available documentation, visibility from the public right-of-way, and feedback from the Planning Commission on the preliminary Historic Resources Inventory (HRI), this property was not recommended for inclusion on the inaugural HRI.

FIGURE 1: LOCATION MAP

835

MEMO
290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road, Goleta

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP
3 SURVEY METHODOLOGY
At the outset of the historic resources survey project, the survey team reviewed available data from previous studies of the area, including properties on the Santa Barbara County Compiled List that are now within the City of Goleta; any properties within the City that are listed on the State of California Historic Resources Inventory (now referred to as the Built Environment Resources Directory or BERD);2 the list of properties identified as part of the development of the Goleta General Plan; and other properties identified by the community or through research for the Historic Context Statement. HRG then conducted a reconnaissance (or windshield) survey of the entire city in order to review all of the previously identified properties and to identify additional properties, neighborhoods, and features that may be historically significant. Following the reconnaissance survey, additional research and analysis was conducted on neighborhoods and individual properties in order to make recommendations for potentially eligible properties; the research methodology is outlined below.

All fieldwork was conducted from the public right-of-way. Properties were evaluated under criteria for designation according to the contexts, themes, and eligibility standards outlined in the City of Goleta Historic Context Statement.

Research
Property-specific research was conducted on pr operties identified as potentially eligible through the develop ment of the historic context statement, during the reconnaissance/windshield study for the survey, or based on recommendations received during community outreach efforts. This property-specific research supplemented research efforts undertaken during the development of the context statement, in ord er to confirm construction dates (when possible), identify significant architects and builders, identify original or potentially significant owners, and confirm site history and alterations.

Approximate construction dates were determined using information from historic aerial

2 The California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) maintains the Built Environment Resource Directory (“BERD”), formerly referred to as the Historical Resources Inventory (HRI), a database of previously evaluated resources throughout the state. The BERD contains information only for cultural resources that have been processed through OHP. This includes resources reviewed for eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places and the California Historical Landmarks programs through federal and state environmental compliance laws, and resources nominated under federal and state registration programs. The BERD includes 55 resources with addresses noted as being located in the City of Goleta. Upon closer examination, only three entries are in fact located within the boundaries of the City of Goleta. The three entries within City limits are the Stow House (304 Los Carneros Rd), the Goleta Depot (300 Los Carneros Rd), and the Public Storage facility (5425 Overpass Rd). The Stow House and the Goleta Depot are listed with status code 1S, indicating tha t they are listed in the National Register of Historic Places. The Public Storage facility is listed with a 6Y, indicating that it was formally evaluated for the National Register of Historic Places through a Section 106 process and found ineligible. The Sexton House and its associated features are listed in the BERD as located in Santa Barbara, with a status code 1D, indicating that the property is listed as a multiple -property resource in the National Register of Historic Places. Several features are also listed with the status code 6X, indicating that they were determined ineligible for the National Register by the Keeper of the National Register.
836

MEMO
290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road, Goleta

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP
4 photographs, the 1930 Sanborn Fire Insurance map of Goleta, planning permits, and visual observation. In all cases, approximate construction dates were based on the best available information.

Research sources include:
• Planning permits (as available from the Planning Department; many properties did not have permits on file with the City, and building permits were not available). • Historic aerial photographs.
• Search of local newspapers for key developments, owners, archi tects, and other historic personages.
• Archival research at local repositories.
• Online and manual search of Goleta city directories up to 1970, as available. This primarily consisted of business directories housed in Special Collections at UCSB.

837

MEMO
290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road, Goleta

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP
5 DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
Ellwood Ranch
The property at 290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road is located at the northwest boundary of the City of Goleta. The property was part of Rancho Los Dos Pueblos, granted to Goleta pioneer Nicolas Den in 1842. He used the property as a cattle ranch until his death in 1862.

After his death, Den’s ranch was subdivided into smaller parcels for his heirs, including his wife, Rosa, and each of their ten children. 3 The portions of the ranch set aside for Den's children were to be held in trust until each child came of age.

In the late 1860s, Charles E. Huse, the executor of Nicolas Den’s estate, arranged for the sale of several tracts of land in the former Den estate. Ellwood Cooper, a Goleta pioneer known for introducing exotic flora to the area, became convinced that Santa Barbara olive oil could compete commercially with Italian oil, and in 1869, purchased 2,000 acres of the former Den estate, creating a ranch seven-eighths of a mile wide, running along the coast between Winchester and Glen Annie canyons.
4 Cooper’s beach frontage extended from
Kate Den Bell’s Las Armas Ranch (site of the futur e Ellwood oil strike) to Alfonso Den’s ranch at Coal Oil Point (now the Devereux Ranch School campus) on the east.”5 He named it Ellwood Ranch.

Cooper intended for his family to live in Santa Barbara while he traveled to and from his ranch daily. However, after a year of traveling the twelve- mile round trip on horseback, Cooper became frustrated with this arrangement, and built a small redwood board and batten house for overnight use. His wife, Sarah, moved with him, and additions were made to the house as needed. The house became the focus of a complex of barns, machine shops, an olive mill, and other outbuildings, most of which were removed by subsequent owners.6 Cooper also planted seven different orchards of olive trees, as well as English walnuts, wheat, and Japanese persimmons.7
In the mid-1870s, Cooper’s claim to former Den lands was contested. The portion of the Den estate on which Ellwood Ranch was located had been held in trust for a Den heir who had not yet come of age in 1869, when Cooper purchased the land. Because the sale went against Den’s will, the Santa Barbara Probate Court did not approve the sale. After initially fighting the lawsuit, Cooper settled with the Dens, surrendering all of his property west of Goleta and south of Hollister Avenue. Cooper retained the portions of the ranch comprising

3 “4.11.1.1.3 Historic Background,” Final Environmental Impact Report for the Comstock Homes Development and Ellwood Mesa Open Space Plan, 4.11-6.
4 Walker A. Tompkins, Goleta: The Good Land (Goleta, CA: Goleta Amvets Post No. 55, 1966 ), 114. 5 Tompkins, Goleta: The Good Land, 114.
6 Tompkins, Goleta: The Good Land, 115-116.
7 Noticias, “Ellwood Cooper: In His Own Words,” Summer 1993, Vol. XXXIX, No. 2 838

MEMO
290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road, Goleta

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP
6 160 acres of eucalyptus seedlings; his persimmon, olive, and walnut orchards; his olive mill; his residence; and the other buildings on the property.8 In 1912, Ellwood Cooper sold Ellwood Ranch to Major Charles J.M. McGill -Crichton and Francis H. Greene.9 On January 25, 1914, a “brief but devastating flood” caused extensive damage to the ranch, obliterating the “valuable orchard of Japanese persimmons,” and “Cooper’s historic olive orchards, an irrigation system, the engine house, a fine graded road […] and a total of fifteen private bridges.” 10 Greene and Crichton retained joint ownership of the property until 1915, when Crichton was killed while fighting in World War I. In 1920, Greene died of pneumonia.

In 1921, Crichton’s and Greene’s wives sold Ellwood Ranch to Joseph Archambault and J.E.

Doty at public auction. 11 The partnership lasted until approximately 1927, when Archambault left the partnership . By 1939, the property was home to Ellwood Ranch, Ellwood Dairies, and Bob & Curl Salon. 12 The ranch and dairy operations, run by brothers Frank, Lawrence, Russell, and Fred Doty, employed numerous laborers, many of whom lived on the property with their spouses.13
In 1949, “sparks from a brush fire […] destroyed the old ‘boarding house’ on the Ellwood ranch.”14 In 1961, a 453-acre tract of Ellwood Ranch was sold in to Roy Eaton, Jack Schwartz, Herbert H. Braun, Walker-Built Homes, Inc.15 Ellwood Ranch remained the property of the Doty family into the 21st century.
290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road
At an unknown date, the parcel now known as 290 /295 Ellwood Canyon Road w as subdivided from the main Ellwood Ranch property.16 The parcel comprises 23.44 acres. As of 2021, 290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road contains the built resources listed below; dates are based on available documentation:

8 Tompkins, Goleta: The Good Land, 166-167.
9 “Big Ranch Sold,” Los Angeles Times, December 2, 1912. Many reports of the ranch’s sale to various parties had circulated in years previous; however, this is the only sale that went through. 10 Tompkins, Goleta: The Good Land, 255-256.
11 “Ranch Sale Sets Record for State,” Los Angeles Times, May 27, 1921; “Famous Ellwood Ranch In Santa Barbara Sold,” Sacramento Bee, May 28, 1921.
12 1939 Goleta City Directory. Bob & Curl Salon was run by Mary Atterbury, the wife of a dairyman at Ellwood Ranch. 13 1939 Goleta City Directory. Bob & Curl Salon was run by Mary Atterbury, the wife of a dairyman at Ellwood Ranch. 14 “The Core No More,” Ventura County Star, March 29, 1949. 15 “Part of Historic Ranch in Goleta Valley Sold,” Los Angeles Times, February 26, 1961. It is unclear whether this tract is located in the City of Goleta.
16 Deed research may clarify when this parcel was subdivided from Ellwood Ranch, and if or when the Doty family sold this parcel.
839

MEMO
290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road, Goleta

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP
7 • Barn (constructed prior to 1928; Map Number 1);
• Single-family residence (constructed prior to 1938; Map Number 2); • Metal outbuilding (constructed prior to 1928; Map Number 3); • Metal outbuilding (constructed c. 1995; Map Number 4); • Metal outbuilding (constructed prior to 1938; Map Number 5); • Metal outbuilding (constructed c. 1955; Map Number 6); and • Metal outbuilding (constructed c. 1955; Map Number 7).

The property also contains numerous temporary structures (greenhouses and sheds), as well as several cultivated fields. There are also numerous mature trees and shrubs, including a gum tree known locally as the “Ellwood Queen,” believed to have been planted by Ellwood Cooper in 1887.
17 No original building permits or any subsequent permits were found for any building on the property. As a result, approximate construction dates listed above are based on available historic aerial photographs of the property. The barn on the property may have been constructed in the 19
th century by Ellwood Cooper;18 however, no evidence has been found to substantiate that claim.

The metal outbuilding at 295 Ellwood Canyon Road may have been used as Indio Farms in 1993 by Gregg Carlile and Kenyon Fink. N o additional information about the business was found; it does not appear to be in operation at the property.

RECOMMENDATIONS
Additional information, including a site visit to view existing conditions on the property, would be necessary to complete an assessment of the property at 290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road. More in-depth research into the property’s ownership history and the subdivision of this parcel is necessary to determine the property’s potential historical significance and its historic integrity. Based on the survey methodology, HRG recommends that 290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road remain on the Study List pending additional information about the property’s association with Ellwood Cooper and its historic integrity.

17 Tom Modugno, “The Ellwood Queen,” Goleta History, December 16, 2021, https://goletahistory.com/the-ellwood- queen/ (accessed January 11, 2022).
18 Tom Modugno, “The Ellwood Queen,” Goleta History, December 16, 2021, https://goletahistory.com/the-ellwood- queen/ (accessed January 11, 2022). Note that trees in Goleta are regulated under the Goleta Urban Forest Management Plan, adopted June 7, 2011 and amended Feb ruary 21, 2017. 840

MEMO
290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road, Goleta

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP
APPENDIX A – HISTORIC NEWSPAPER ARTICLES

841
The Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California) · Fri, Dec 2, 1887 · Page 3 https://www.newspapers.com/image/378360897 Downloaded on Dec 21, 2021 Copyright © 2021 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved.
842
Los Angeles Herald (Los Angeles, California) · W ed, Feb 17, 1892 · Page 8 https://www.newspapers.com/image/42211270 Downloaded on Dec 21, 2021 Copyright © 2021 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved.
843
The Evening Express (Los Angeles, California) · Fri, Apr 8, 1892 · Page 4 https://www.newspapers.com/image/607577134 Downloaded on Dec 21, 2021 Copyright © 2021 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved.
844
The Evening Express (Los Angeles, California) · Sat, Apr 30, 1892 · Page 2 https://www.newspapers.com/image/607578431 Downloaded on Dec 21, 2021 Copyright © 2021 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved.
845
The Santa Maria Times (Santa Maria, California) · Sat, Feb 8, 1902 · Page 1 https://www.newspapers.com/image/628859705 Downloaded on Dec 21, 2021 Copyright © 2021 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved.
846
The Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California) · Mon, Dec 2, 1912 · Page 15 https://www.newspapers.com/image/380147612 Downloaded on Dec 21, 2021 Copyright © 2021 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved.
847
San Francisco Chronicle (San Francisco, California) · W ed, Nov 3, 1915 · Page 6 https://www.newspapers.com/image/27495902 Downloaded on Dec 21, 2021 Copyright © 2021 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved.
848
Santa Ana Register (Santa Ana, California) · W ed, Jul 14, 1920 · Page 13 https://www.newspapers.com/image/71409909 Downloaded on Dec 21, 2021 Copyright © 2021 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved.
849
The Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California) · Mon, May 23, 1921 · Page 6 https://www.newspapers.com/image/380655190 Downloaded on Dec 21, 2021 Copyright © 2021 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved.
850
Los Angeles Evening Express (Los Angeles, California) · Fri, May 27, 1921 · Page 19 https://www.newspapers.com/image/608125552 Downloaded on Dec 21, 2021 Copyright © 2021 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved.
851
The Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California) · Fri, May 27, 1921 · Page 20 https://www.newspapers.com/image/380656962 Downloaded on Dec 22, 2021 Copyright © 2021 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved.
852
The Sacramento Bee (Sacramento, California) · Sat, May 28, 1921 · Page 32 https://www.newspapers.com/image/616775163 Downloaded on Dec 21, 2021 Copyright © 2021 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved.
853
The Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California) · W ed, Jun 15, 1921 · Page 6 https://www.newspapers.com/image/380502107 Downloaded on Dec 21, 2021 Copyright © 2021 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved.
854
Ventura County Star-Free Press (Ventura, California) · Tue, Mar 29, 1949 · Page 3 https://www.newspapers.com/image/624903597 Downloaded on Dec 21, 2021 Copyright © 2021 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved.
855
The Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California) · Sun, Feb 26, 1961 · Page 114 https://www.newspapers.com/image/386273855 Downloaded on Dec 21, 2021 Copyright © 2021 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved.
856
Santa Maria Times (Santa Maria, California) · Thu, Jul 26, 1984 · Page 10 https://www.newspapers.com/image/447119605 Downloaded on Dec 21, 2021 Copyright © 2021 Newspapers.com. All Rights Reserved.
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881

MEMO
290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road, Goleta

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP
APPENDIX B – HISTORIC AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS

1928 aerial photograph. 290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road outlined in red. Source: Fairchild Aerial Surveys, Frame 69, 1:18,000, C-307A. University of California Santa Barbara Aerial Photography Collection.

1929 aerial photograph. 290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road outlined in red. Source: Fairchild Aerial Surveys, Frame Z -2, 1:5,400, C-690. University of California Santa Barbara Aerial Photography Collection. 882

MEMO
290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road, Goleta

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP

1938 aerial photograph. 290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road outlined in red. Source: Fairchild Aerial Surveys, Frame SE -167, 1:24,000, C-4950. University of California Santa Barbara Aerial Photography Collection.

1948 aerial photograph. 290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road outlined in red. Source: Fairchild Aerial Surveys, Frame 12 -52, 1:7,200, C-12790. University of California Santa Barbara Aerial Photography Collection. 883

MEMO
290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road, Goleta

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP

1954 aerial photograph. 290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road outlined in red. Source: Pacific Air Industries, Frame 6K-29, 1:20,000, BTM-1954. University of California Santa Barbara Aerial Photography Collection.

1956 aerial photograph. 290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road outlined in red. Source: Mark Hurd Aerial Surveys, Frame 1 - 135, 1:9,600, HA-AN. University of California Santa Barbara Aerial Photography Collection. 884

MEMO
290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road, Goleta

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP

1960 aerial photograph. 290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road ou tlined in red. Source: Mark Hurd Aerial Surveys, Frame 4, 1:42,000, HA-JX. University of California Santa Barbara Aerial Photography Collection.

1966 aerial photograph. 290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road outlined in red. Source: Mark Hurd Aerial Surveys, Fram e 191, 1:12,000, HB-IU. University of California Santa Barbara Aerial Photography Collection. 885

MEMO
290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road, Goleta

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP

1972 aerial photograph. 290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road outlined in red. Source: Mark Hurd Aerial Surveys, Frame 122, 1:24,000, HB-TI. University of California Santa Barbara Aerial Photography Collection.

1983 aerial photograph. 290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road outlined in red. Source: Pacific Western Aerial Surveys, Frame 23, 1:24,000, PW-SB-5. University of California Santa Barbara Aerial Photography Collection. 886

MEMO
290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road, Goleta

HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP

1994 aerial photograph. 290/295 Ellwood Canyon R oad outlined in red. Source: USGS, Frame 6925 -102, 1:40,000, NAPP-2C. University of California Santa Barbara Aerial Photography Collection.

2001 aerial photograph. 290/295 Ellwood Canyon Road outlined in red. Source: California Coastal Commission , Frame 6925-102, 1:40,000, CCC-BQK-C. University of California Santa Barbara Aerial Photography Collection.

887

ATTACHMENT 12

PUBLIC COMMENT RECEIVED AFTER DECEMBER 7, 2021

888
1 Hello Lisa,
We have discussed it and have come to the decision that we do not want our church – St Raphael at 5444 Hollister Ave – to be designated as a Historic Resource. Thank you for your assistance and explanation of the process. I have copied the City Clerks’ office on the email so it can be entered into the public record.

Best,
Virginia Dargen
Virginia Dargen
Archdiocese of Los Angeles
Real Estate – Escrow Administrator
3424 Wilshire Blvd.

Los Angeles, CA 90010-2241
(213) 637-7505
889

Goleta City CouncilApril 5, 2022

Goleta City Council
April 5, 2022