Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Gonzales City Council
June 2, 2025

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
June 2, 2025
Body
Gonzales City Council
Pages
29
Original file
24.4 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on gonzalesca.iqm2.com. That file is the official record.

Any writing or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at City Hall located at 147 Fourth Street, Gonzales, California, during normal business hours.

Page 1 of 4 ends

A G E N D A

JOINT MEETING OF THE

GONZALES CITY COUNCIL AND

GONZALES SUCCESSOR AGENCY
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS – 117 FOURTH STREET
GONZALES, CA 93926
MONDAY, JUNE 2, 2025
6:00 P.M.

CALL TO ORDER

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

1. ROLL CALL- City Council/Successor Agency
Mayor Pro Tem/Vice Chair Liz Silva, Council/Agency Member Scott Funk, Council/Agency Member Lorraine Worthy, Council/Agency Member Maria Orozco, Mayor/Chair Jose L. Rios
Successor Agency Item

PUBLIC NOTICE
This meeting is being conducted consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20 dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. The public may participate in person or online via zoom at https://us06web.zoom.us/j/87020263943 or call 1 (669) 900-6833 and use Meeting ID: 870 2026 3943. If you wish to make either a general public comment or to comment on a specific agenda item, please use the Raise Hand function. You will be allowed three minutes for your comments.

If you choose not to attend the City Council meeting but wish to make a comment on a specific agenda item, please submit your comment limited to 250 words or less by 12:00p.m. on the day of the meeting to the City Clerk at [email protected]

PRESENTATIONS

2. Certificates of Recognition to Gonzales High School Track and Field Athletes

3. Central Coast Community Energy Annual Update

4. Gonzales Youth Council FY 2024-2025 End of Year Presentation; and a) Consider Approval of Proclamation No. 2025-04 Commending Youth Commissioner Valeria Cardenas Pacheco; and b) Proclamation No. 2025-05 Commending Youth Commissioner Emily Mendez *
Any writing or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at City Hall located at 147 Fourth Street, Gonzales, California, during normal business hours.

Page 2 of 4 ends

BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC

5. Business from the Public not on the Agenda; any member of the Public may address the Council/Agency for a period not to exceed three minutes on any subject not on the Agenda. The Council/Agency will listen to all communications but may take no action.

CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine by the City Council and will be adopted by one action of the Council unless any Council Member has a question or wishes to make a statement or discuss an item. In that event, the Mayor will remove the item from the Consent Calendar for separate consideration.

6. Approve the Joint City Council & Successor Agency - Regular Meeting - May 19, 2025 Minutes

7. Approve City Accounts Payable Warrants #52047-52107

8. Consider Approval of Resolution No. 2025-29, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Recognizing and Congratulating Carl G. Sedoryk on His 25-Year Anniversary with Monterey-Salinas Transit

9. Consider Approval of Resolution No. 2025-30, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Establishing Public Comment Time Limits and Related Procedures

10. Consider Approval of Resolution No. 2025-31, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Appointing Patrick Dobbins to the Salinas Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency Board

11. Consider Approval of the Revised Job Description for the Community Development Services Technician/Administrative Analyst Position

12. Consider Approval of Resolution No. 2025-32, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Designating Harris and Associates as Engineer of Work for Assessment Districts, and Directing the Filing of Engineer’s Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Annual Reports Therefor; Designating Jarvis, Fay, & Gibson, LLP as District Counsel for Assessment Districts; and Authorizing Compensation for All Assessment District Work

13. Consider Approval of Resolution No. 2025-33, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Declaring Intention to Confirm Diagrams and to Levy and Collect Annual Assessments Pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 - California Breeze Benefit Assessment District Nos. 1, 2, and 3

14. Consider Approval of Resolution No. 2025-34, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Providing Preliminary Approval of Engineer’s Report, Stating Intention to Confirm Diagram and to Levy and Collect Annual Assessments Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 - California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District

15. Consider Approval of Resolution No. 2025-35, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales of Intention to Confirm Diagram and to Levy and Collect Annual Assessments Pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 - Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Nos. 1, 2 & 3

16. Consider Approval of Resolution No. 2025-36, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Providing Preliminary Approval of Engineer’s Report, Stating Intention to Confirm Diagram and to Levy and Collect Annual Assessments Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 - Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District Nos. 1, 2 and 3

17. Consider Approval of Resolution No. 2025-37, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales of Intention to Confirm Diagram and to Levy and Collect Annual Assessments Pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 - Gonzales Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District

18. Consider Approval of Resolution No. 2025-38, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Providing Preliminary Approval of Engineer’s Report, Stating Intention to Confirm Diagram and to Levy and Collect Annual Assessments Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 - Gonzales Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District

19. Consider Approval of Resolution No. 2025-39, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Declaring Intention to Confirm Diagram and to Levy and Collect Annual Assessments Pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 - Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District *
Any writing or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at City Hall located at 147 Fourth Street, Gonzales, California, during normal business hours.

Page 3 of 4 ends

20. Consider Approval of Resolution No. 2025-40, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Providing Preliminary Approval of Engineer’s Report, Stating Intention to Confirm Diagram and to Levy and Collect Annual Assessments Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 - Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District

REGULAR AGENDA

21. Consider Approval of Resolution No. 2025-28, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Establishing the Cost for Services Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 a) Staff Report
b) Public Hearing
c) Council Discussion
d) Council Action
Staff Recommended Action-Adopt Resolution No. 2025-28

22. Introduce, Waive Reading, and Read by Title Only Ordinance No. 2025-150, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Amending Ordinance No. 2019-115 of the Gonzales City Code (Tobacco Retailer License) to Prohibit the Sale of All Flavored Tobacco Products and to Prohibit Single Use Electronic Smoking Products
a) Staff Report
b) Public Comment
c) Council Discussion
d) Council Action
Staff Recommended Action-Introduce, waive reading and read by title only Ordinance No. 2025- 150; and set a public hearing to solicit public comments on this ordinance for June 16, 2025

23. Introduce, Waive Reading, and Read by Title Only Ordinance No. 2025-151, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Amending Section 3.16.085- “Bidding Procedures for Public Construction Projects” of Chapter 3.16-Purchasing Procedures, of the Gonzales City Code a) Staff Report
b) Public Comment
c) Council Discussion
d) Council Action
Staff Recommended Action-Introduce, waive reading and read by title only Ordinance No. 2025- 151

GONZALES YOUTH COUNCIL UPDATES

24. Oral Communications

BUSINESS FROM CITY COUNCIL

25. City Council Board/Committee Reports
a. Transportation Agency for Monterey County
b. Mayor Selection Committee
c. Salinas Valley Recycles

26. Oral Communications

BUSINESS FROM CITY MANAGER

27. Oral Communications

Any writing or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at City Hall located at 147 Fourth Street, Gonzales, California, during normal business hours.

Page 4 of 4 ends

ADJOURNMENT

In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (831) 675-5000. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. (CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II). This is a public meeting and as such, can be seen live by people present or online and is being recorded; therefore; anything you say or do here is public information. The recordings are available online.

I, Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Gonzales, do hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Joint City Council/Successor Agency Regular Meeting Agenda was posted at City Hall, Council Chambers, and on the City’s website by Thursday, May 29, 2025, at 5:00p.m. 05/29/25
Mary Villegas Date
3CE Annual Update
City of Gonzales
June 2, 2025
Packet Pg. 5
Attachment: 3CE Annual Update 2025 Powerpoint (3272 : Central Coast Community Energy Annual AGENDA
ITEM
3 Together,
Power for Good
Packet Pg. 6
Attachment: 3CE Annual Update 2025 Powerpoint (3272 : Central Coast Community Energy Annual 2024 Energy Highlights
Sourced 409 Megawatts
of clean & renewable energy in 2024, enough to power
350,850 households with renewable energy.

Sourcing Renewable Energy
avoided more than 445,000 metric tons of CO2,the
equivalent of taking 105,911 gasoline-powered passenger vehicles off the road for a year.

Packet Pg. 7
Attachment: 3CE Annual Update 2025 Powerpoint (3272 : Central Coast Community Energy Annual Willow Rock Energy Storage Center
● Storage is essential for CA's transition to carbon-free energy ● Utilizes compressed air to generate power on demand
● Largest compressed air energy storage project in the world ● 200 megawatts for 3CE customers
Our Energy Future
New Renewable Energy Project
Packet Pg. 8
Attachment: 3CE Annual Update 2025 Powerpoint (3272 : Central Coast Community Energy Annual Our Energy Future
New Renewable Energy Project
Atlas Solar
● 150 megawatts for 3CE customers
● Enough to power 105,100 homes
Packet Pg. 9
Attachment: 3CE Annual Update 2025 Powerpoint (3272 : Central Coast Community Energy Annual Aratina Solar + Storage
● 120 megawatts for 3CE customers
● Enough to power 90,000 homes
Our Energy Future
New Renewable Energy Project
Packet Pg. 10
Attachment: 3CE Annual Update 2025 Powerpoint (3272 : Central Coast Community Energy Annual Victory Pass Solar + Storage
● 100 megawatts for 3CE customers
● Enough to power 68,000 homes
Online Now
New Renewable Energy Project
Packet Pg. 11
Attachment: 3CE Annual Update 2025 Powerpoint (3272 : Central Coast Community Energy Annual Connecting with Customers
2024 Highlights:
● 160 community events
● 41 local memberships
● 7 webinars
● 2 community workshops
Packet Pg. 12
Attachment: 3CE Annual Update 2025 Powerpoint (3272 : Central Coast Community Energy Annual Expanding Access
● Unique and diverse needs of the Central Coast
● Spanish-language material and 1:1 service
● Underserved Communities Action Plan
● Tailored workshops and forums
Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: 3CE Annual Update 2025 Powerpoint (3272 : Central Coast Community Energy Annual Empowering Customers
● Customer choice
● OhmConnect partnership
● Residential Battery Rebate Program
Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: 3CE Annual Update 2025 Powerpoint (3272 : Central Coast Community Energy Annual 3CE Gives Customers the Power to
Do More with their Energy
● Customers plug in to rebates, transition to clean energy ● Since 2018, nearly 7,000 customers have received 3CE
rebates
● $11 million in rebates distributed in 2024
● $4 million in rebates distributed to income
qualified customers and disadvantaged communities
Packet Pg. 15
Attachment: 3CE Annual Update 2025 Powerpoint (3272 : Central Coast Community Energy Annual Making a Difference
Community Investment
Snapshot of Rebates & Incentives:
● 2,843 electric vehicles
● 2,085 EV chargers
● 1,663 projects for EV readiness
● 38 electric buses
● 746 all-electric water heaters & HVAC systems
● 1,458 all-electric affordable housing units
● 93 all-electric agriculture equipment projects
Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: 3CE Annual Update 2025 Powerpoint (3272 : Central Coast Community Energy Annual Community Investment
Rebates & Incentives
City of Gonzales 3CE Investment: • $65,561 – Ag Electrification • $200,000 – Electric Bus • $30,155 – Electrify Your Home • $23,665 – Electrify Your Ride City of Greenfield 3CE Investment: • $38,453 – Plan Your Fleet • $7,500 – Electrify Your Home • $36,917 – Electrify Your Ride Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: 3CE Annual Update 2025 Powerpoint (3272 : Central Coast Community Energy Annual Contact Us: • Northern Region: Sophia Schwirzke ([email protected]) • Southern Region: Spencer Brandt ([email protected]) • Senior Advisor for Policy and Legislative Affairs: Das Williams ([email protected])
Learn more & apply for programs at 3Cenergy.org
Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: 3CE Annual Update 2025 Powerpoint (3272 : Central Coast Community Energy Annual Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: 3CE Annual Update 2025 Powerpoint (3272 : Central Coast Community Energy Annual • Balancing intermittent renewables
• Adding grid services and stability
• Reducing reliance on combustion generation
• Driving affordability
• Empowering customers
Battery Energy Storage Systems
Support the Renewable Transition
Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: 3CE Annual Update 2025 Powerpoint (3272 : Central Coast Community Energy Annual Decarbonization
A Storage Challenge
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: 3CE Annual Update 2025 Powerpoint (3272 : Central Coast Community Energy Annual CAISO Supply Trend
September 2022
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: 3CE Annual Update 2025 Powerpoint (3272 : Central Coast Community Energy Annual CAISO Supply Trend
September 2024
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: 3CE Annual Update 2025 Powerpoint (3272 : Central Coast Community Energy Annual Annual Renewable Curtailment
Source: CAISO
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: 3CE Annual Update 2025 Powerpoint (3272 : Central Coast Community Energy Annual • Outreach to underserved communities
• Awareness of financial assistance and energy
programs
• Feedback to remove barriers and improve
access
• Re-enrollment and customer awareness
campaign
Underserved Communities
Action Plan
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: 3CE Annual Update 2025 Powerpoint (3272 : Central Coast Community Energy Annual Rooftop Solar with 3CE
NEM 1.0, NEM 2.0, and the Solar Billing Plan
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: 3CE Annual Update 2025 Powerpoint (3272 : Central Coast Community Energy Annual The Annual True-Up
NEM 1.0, NEM 2.0, and the Solar Billing Plan
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: 3CE Annual Update 2025 Powerpoint (3272 : Central Coast Community Energy Annual PROCLAMATION NO. 2025-04
WHEREAS, Valeria Cardenas Pacheco has served as a dedicated member of the Gonzales Youth Council from 2022 to 2024, and was appointed as a Youth Commissioner in the Summer of 2024 by the Gonzales City Manager and the Gonzales Unified School District Superintendent, during which time she has demonstrated extraordinary leadership, civic responsibility, and a deep commitment to community empowerment; and WHEREAS, Commissioner Valeria Cardenas Pacheco researched and co authored a study on Mental Health in collaboration with other Gonzales Youth Council Members and Dr.

Jennifer Lovell, Associate Professor of Psychology at California State University Monterey Bay, that was published in a national journal on school psychology; and WHEREAS, Commissioner Valeria Cardenas Pacheco has led multiple presentations including one titled “Take action! How to use Data and Advocacy to Improve Youth Mental Health” which was presented at the Monterey Youth Mental Health Summit in 2023 and also a Data Walk for Mental Health Awareness which was held at Gonzales High School in 2023; and
WHEREAS, Commissioner Valeria Cardenas Pacheco organized and led numerous community-based initiatives, including a substance abuse prevention campaign, advocating for academic resource expansion and efforts to improve housing and tenant rights in her community; and
WHEREAS, Valeria Cardenas Pacheco is an exceptional student who demonstrates remarkable academic and extracurricular achievements. She has excelled in her studies at Gonzales High School, where she has been an active member of the Principal’s Honor Roll all 4 years and has been involved in various initiatives, including the Ivy League Project, Gonzales FFA and President of the Gonzales High Model UN & Debate Team; and WHEREAS, Valeria Cardenas Pacheco, a proud first-generation Mexican American, and is recognized as being able to engage diverse stakeholders, from local officials to community organizations and youth, and has demonstrated her strong advocacy; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, this 2nd Day of June in the year 2025, by the Gonzales City Council, that Valeria Cardenas Pacheco is proudly recognized for her outstanding leadership, unwavering service, passionate advocacy, and inspiring resilience; and with heartfelt appreciation, the City of Gonzales celebrates Valeria’s remarkable impact on our community and sends her off with the very best wishes as she graduates from Gonzales High School and embarks on an exciting new journey at California State University, Long Beach.

Jose L. Rios, The Honorable Mayor
June 2, 2025
AGENDA
ITEM
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Proclamations No. 2025-04 and 2025-05 Youth Commissioners (3286 : GYC End of Year Presentation & Proclamation No 2025-04 4 PROCLAMATION NO. 2025-05
WHEREAS, Emily Mendez has served as a dedicated member of the Gonzales Youth Council from 2022 to 2024, and was appointed as a Youth Commissioner in the Summer of 2024 by the Gonzales City Manager and the Gonzales Unified School District Superintendent, during which time she has demonstrated extraordinary leadership, civic responsibility, and a deep commitment to community empowerment; and
WHEREAS, Commissioner Emily Mendez led a citywide substance use prevention initiative in collaboration with key partners—including the Gonzales Fire and Police Departments, Sun Street Centers, and The Epicenter (Friday Night Live)—by coordinating a week-long campaign that addressed systemic barriers such as gang involvement and substance abuse that impact young people in Gonzales and across South Monterey County; and WHEREAS, Commissioner Emily Mendez has contributed to numerous action projects addressing mental health resources, educational equity, and the local teacher shortage; and played a key role in youth-led planning for the development of the Gonzales Community Center Complex and Teen Innovation Center, while also conducting asset mapping research to help identify local strengths and needs; and WHEREAS, Commissioner Emily Mendez is the founder of the Music Clothing Film Club at Gonzales High School, where she organized a successful clothing drive in partnership with the GHS Career Closet; and
WHEREAS, Emily’s academic excellence is reflected in her consistent Principal's Honor Roll status, 4.3 GPA, and completion of dual enrollment courses at Hartnell College, all while remaining actively engaged in extracurricular and service activities; and WHEREAS, as Secretary of the California Scholarship Federation and a member of the Gonzales High School Marching Band, Emily has shown both organizational leadership and artistic dedication, enriching her school and community through collaboration, performance, and volunteerism; and
WHEREAS, Emily Mendez, a proud first-generation Mexican American woman, is widely recognized as a confident, competent changemaker who seeks every opportunity to grow and uplift others—an inspiration to her peers and a steadfast advocate for youth voice, educational equity, and social change.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, this 2nd Day of June in the year 2025, by the Gonzales City Council, that Emily Mendez is hereby commended for her exemplary leadership, service, advocacy, and resilience. The City extends its heartfelt gratitude for her meaningful contributions to Gonzales and offers its best wishes as she graduates from Gonzales High School and begins her next chapter at the University of California, Berkeley.

Jose L. Rios, The Honorable Mayor
June 2, 2025
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Proclamations No. 2025-04 and 2025-05 Youth Commissioners (3286 : GYC End of Year Presentation & Proclamation No 2025-04

Page 1 of 8 ends

MINUTES

JOINT MEETING OF THE

GONZALES CITY COUNCIL AND

GONZALES SUCCESSOR AGENCY
MONDAY, MAY 19, 2025
6:00 P.M.

CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 6:00 PM by Mayor Jose L. Rios.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The flag salute was recited by all present.

1. ROLL CALL
Attendee Name Title Status
Jose L. Rios Mayor Present
Liz Silva Mayor Pro Tem Present
Scott Funk Council Member Present
Lorraine Worthy Council Member Present
Maria Orozco Council Member Present

YOUTH COMMISSIONERS

Absent: Emily Mendez and Valeria Cardenas.

STAFF PRESENT
City Manager Carmen Gil, City Attorney Michael F. Rodriquez, Community Development Director Taven Kinison Brown, Finance Director Mike Howard, Executive Assistant to the City Manager/Deputy City Clerk Mary Villegas, Administrative Assistant II Esthela Palmerin, Public Works Director/City Engineer Patrick Dobbins, Fire Chief Jason Muscio, and Police Chief Keith Wise. * Successor Agency Item
Packet Pg. 30
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of May 19, 2025 6:00 PM (CONSENT AGENDA) AGENDA
ITEM
6

Page 2 of 8 ends

PUBLIC NOTICE
This meeting is being conducted consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20 dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. The public may participate in person or online via zoom at https://us06web.zoom.us/j/87020263943 or call 1 (669) 900-6833 and use Meeting ID: 870 2026 3943. If you wish to make either a general public comment or to comment on a specific agenda item, please use the Raise Hand function. You will be allowed three minutes for your comments.

If you choose not to attend the City Council meeting but wish to make a comment on a specific agenda item, please submit your comment limited to 250 words or less by 12:00p.m. on the day of the meeting to the City Clerk at [email protected]
Mayor Rios announced he would be going through the presentations and consent agenda items and then hand it over to Mayor Pro Tem Silva to read the rest of the agenda items due to his vision getting worse.

PRESENTATIONS

2. Certificates of Recognition to Fairview Middle School Students Essay Contest Winners Council Member Worthy read and presented the certificates tot the students.

3. Consider Approval of, and Present Resolution No. 2025-24, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Honoring the Gonzales Customs Car Club for Their Collaboration on the City’s Third Annual Show and Shine Car Show of April 5, 2025 RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Maria Orozco, Council Member
SECONDER: Scott Funk, Council Member
AYES: Jose L. Rios, Liz Silva, Scott Funk, Lorraine Worthy, Maria Orozco Recreation Coordinator Olmedo-Albor read and presented the resolution to the Gonzales Customs Car Club members.

The club members thanked the City and felt honored to receive the resolution and said they were happy to help and continue supporting the youth in the community.

4. Consider Approval of, and Present Resolution No. 2025-25, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Honoring the Street Life Car Club for Their Collaboration on the City’s Third Annual Show and Shine Car Show of April 5, 2025
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Liz Silva, Mayor Pro Tem
SECONDER: Maria Orozco, Council Member
AYES: Jose L. Rios, Liz Silva, Scott Funk, Lorraine Worthy, Maria Orozco Youth Programs Coordinator Douglas read and presented the resolution to the Street Life Car Club members.

Packet Pg. 31
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of May 19, 2025 6:00 PM (CONSENT AGENDA)

Page 3 of 8 ends

The car club members thanked the City for the resolution and were glad to be part of the event.

5. Consider Approval of, and Present Proclamation No. 2025-03, A Proclamation of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Proclaiming May 18 - 24, 2025 as National Public Works Week RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Lorraine Worthy, Council Member
SECONDER: Maria Orozco, Council Member
AYES: Jose L. Rios, Liz Silva, Scott Funk, Lorraine Worthy, Maria Orozco Mayor Pro Tem Silva read and presented the proclamation to Public Works Director Dobbins.

Public Works Director Dobbins thanked the City for the proclamation and elaborated on the event at Toro Park for the 65th year.

6. Community Center Complex Progress Report
Luis Flores, Harris & Associates Construction Manager, went over the project milestones completed to date, site improvements update, community engagement and upcoming activities.

Tyler Verdun, Otto Construction Assistant Project Manager, explained progress of the building exterior and interior, showed different photos of the progress, a time lap video, and the upcoming milestones and potential challenges and risks.

BUSINESS FROM THE PUBLIC

7. Business from the Public not on the Agenda; any member of the Public may address the Council for a period not to exceed three minutes on any subject not on the Agenda. The Council will listen to all communications, but may take no action.

Henry Martinez Sr. commented about having an issue with Melgoza having the worker's comp case, and Gonzales Real News wanted to know if the case happened prior to the 4th of July; and also said he was not ticketing or doing his job at the park during an event.

City Attorney Rodriquez told Mr. Martinez he may have mixed up the individuals, and that the individual he was referring to was not the individual with the worker's comp claim.

Mr. Martinez said he still wanted to bring the cop issue up anyway and continue saying he assaulted him and his son will take care of him later.

Roman Barba commented about not committing a crime when the Police Officers did the search warrant at his house, and elaborated on getting his phone back and the incident and said he filed a lawsuit. He told Chief Wise he “was really bad”.

CONSENT AGENDA

8. Approve the Joint City Council and Successor Agency - Regular Meeting - May 5, 2025 Minutes

9. Approve City Accounts Payable Warrants #51977-52046

10. City Manager’s Report
*
Packet Pg. 32
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of May 19, 2025 6:00 PM (CONSENT AGENDA)

Page 4 of 8 ends

11. Community Development Department Activity Report

12. Community Engagement & Recreation Departments Activity Report

13. Fire Department Activity Report

14. Police Department Activity Report

15. Public Works/City Engineer Department Activity Report

16. Consider Approval of 1) Resolution No. 2025-19, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Authorizing the City Manager to Sign a Reimbursement Agreement Between the City of Gonzales and Jackson Family Investments for the Revised Puente Del Monte Specific Plan, and Annexation Proposal Submitted to the City of Gonzales, April 7, 2025; and 2) Resolution No. 2025-27, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Authorizing the City Manager to Sign a Consulting Services Agreement Between the City of Gonzales and Brent Slama Consulting to Provide Project Management and Planning Product Production for the Revised Puente Del Monte Specific Plan and Annexation Proposal Submitted to the City of Gonzales, April 7, 2025

17. Consider Approval of Resolution No. 2025-20, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Approving the Reappointment of Gloria Velasquez, Tencia Vargas and Adrian Paco to the Gonzales Planning Commission, and Setting the Term of the Commissioners to Expire Four (4) Years from Their Current Term Ending Date

18. Consider Approval of Resolution No. 2025-21, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Authorizing the Execution of a Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Gonzales and the International Association of Fire Fighters Local 5388 Memorandum of Understanding, for the period covering January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2025

19. Consider Approval of Resolution No. 2025-23, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Approving the Purchase of a Trailer Mounted Trash Pump for the Wastewater Treatment Plant in the Amount of $95,000
RESULT: TABLED [UNANIMOUS] Item 19
AYES: Jose L. Rios, Liz Silva, Scott Funk, Lorraine Worthy, Maria Orozco

20. Consider Approval of Resolution No. 2025-26, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Regarding Local Safety Member Industrial Disability Retirement Council Member Silva pulled Item 9 for clarification. She referred to page 30, under National Demographics in the amount of $18,250. She thought we had done that a long time ago.

City Manager Gil responded that at some point this fell off as the invoice was sent to the Attorney's Office and got derailed. She mentioned this was a partnership with Soledad and staff double checked and it was for work that happened a year ago but confirmed it wasn’t paid.

Council Member Worthy also needed more clarification on page 30 on the warrants as well, under US Bank, for credit cards in the amount of $10,224.25. She thought with the new system they would be able to itemize them, and the reason she asked was because it was a high amount.

City Manager Gil responded that was the total of all the credit cards and staff could itemize them but they went into every single detail of everything and it printed about 30 pages just for that. She thought it would create more confusion due to the number of pages but she could definitely send her the itemized details of that warrant.

Council Member Worthy thanked her for doing that.

Packet Pg. 33
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of May 19, 2025 6:00 PM (CONSENT AGENDA)

Page 5 of 8 ends

City Attorney Rodriquez pulled Item 19 and indicated staff would be bringing it back at a subsequent meeting.

City Attorney Rodriquez noted that the Council received a revised Resolution, No. 2025-26, and it was on the dais which was passed out this evening and contained minor ministerial changes.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS] Consent Agenda Items 8-18, and 20 MOVER: Liz Silva, Mayor Pro Tem
SECONDER: Maria Orozco, Council Member
AYES: Jose L. Rios, Liz Silva, Scott Funk, Lorraine Worthy, Maria Orozco

REGULAR AGENDA

21. Gonzales Police Department's AB 481 Annual Report 2024-2025 Staff Report: City Attorney Rodriquez presented the staff report.

Public Comment: Henry Martinez Sr. spoke about not trusting the department with military equipment and felt they misused the drone on the 4th of July because they were at his house instead of catching the fireworks in his neighborhood. He also said the department should be using nonlethal weapons and go back to the batons. He elaborated on the time he got arrested.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Scott Funk, Council Member
SECONDER: Maria Orozco, Council Member
AYES: Jose L. Rios, Liz Silva, Scott Funk, Lorraine Worthy, Maria Orozco

22. Consider Approval of Resolution No. 2025-22, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Awarding a Contract to Gateway Pacific Contractors to Construct the Industrial Wastewater Treatment Facility on the Amount of $23,584,000 Including a Contingency Budget of $1,646,000
Staff Report: Public Works Director Dobbins presented the staff report.

Public Comment: Roman Barba felt the City was probably going to start raising rates on the water and sewer because it was a lot of money for it. He asked if that was going to happen.

Mayor Rios responded that was already done and it was on an agenda a long time ago, and the rates were already set.

Mr. Barba asked when they would go up again.

Public Works Director responded they were done for a five year period and go up January 1st of every year, next one was January 1, 2026 and then it settles down to 7% percent the next two years.

Mr. Barba continued saying Gonzales wasn’t rich to pay for that.

Mayor Pro Tem Silva said we don’t have to answer to public comments.

Council Discussion: Mayor Pro Tem Silva asked staff for clarification about the $6 million amount Packet Pg. 34
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of May 19, 2025 6:00 PM (CONSENT AGENDA)

Page 6 of 8 ends

being still approved by the board.

Public Works Director Dobbins responded the amendment on the SRF loan had to be approved the State Water Resources Control Board, not the Council.

She appreciated the clarification.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Lorraine Worthy, Council Member
SECONDER: Scott Funk, Council Member
AYES: Jose L. Rios, Liz Silva, Scott Funk, Lorraine Worthy, Maria Orozco

23. Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Audit Financial Statements and Management Report Staff Report: Finance Director Howard presented the staff report.

Public Comment: There was none.

Council Discussion: Council Member Worthy felt we needed to reduce some stuff like Meyer Park, or maybe the pool or some of these programs although she felt our kids were important but feared getting to a point of not being able to pay for the infrastructure of our community, and we needed to come up with a solution. She apologized to Council Member Funk for starting the way she did.

Council Member Funk commended staff for doing a great job to slow down and reduce excess spending, and elaborated on the things that were pointed out which were a very small dollar amount compared to a number of items that were much larger across the board that we could tighten up. He explained that was the reason we had the strategy session, and believed we were on the right path we just needed to make sure to maintain what we were doing to get back to our full reserves. But he said staff had been doing a great job with cutting expenses.

City Manager Gil noted that staff was really tightening their belts and continuously cutting where we could in excess spending, and will continue to do so at the Council’s direction. She also informed staff had been going after additional funding such as grants, and elaborated on what was just awarded. She also said the community needed to start stepping up and help just like some community members recently offered to help fill up holes at Meyer Park.

Council Member Orozco added the Rotary Club was also coming forward to replace the small barbecue grills at Central Park which were small things but made a big difference.

Mayor Rios asked about the TUT tax.

Finance Director Howard responded that the largest portion of sales tax that was softening was fuel and elaborated on the cost and economy, but they were still holding fairly strong.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Scott Funk, Council Member
SECONDER: Maria Orozco, Council Member
AYES: Jose L. Rios, Liz Silva, Scott Funk, Lorraine Worthy, Maria Orozco Packet Pg. 35
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of May 19, 2025 6:00 PM (CONSENT AGENDA)

Page 7 of 8 ends

GONZALES YOUTH COUNCIL UPDATES

24. Oral Communications
Youth Commissioners Mendez and Cardenas announced the upcoming South County Youth Summit, GYC workshops at the High School, last GYC meeting this Thursday, and Captsone Presentation scheduled for the June 2nd Council meeting.

BUSINESS FROM CITY COUNCIL

25. City Council Board/Committee Reports
a. League of California Cities Monterey Bay Division
No report.
b. Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments
Council Member Worthy attended as an Alternate and reported on the budget being approved and presentation on the California Rural Energy Network. c. Monterey Salinas Transit
Council Member Worthy reported on the cancellation of the Covid workplace policy, Science on Wheels project, measure Q funding event on May 21st, and announced the next meeting on June 9th.

26. Oral Communications
Council Member Orozco congratulated our previous Youth Commissioner Magaly Santos, for graduating from UC Berkley this weekend, and announced the 4th of July barbecue and members had tickets.

Mayor Pro Tem Silva reported on the Vision Zero public input session she attended at the Police Department last Wednesday regarding traffic safety, and encouraged the community to not let go of these opportunities because their opinion mattered. She missed the Stadium Ceremony due to volunteering at the Salinas Valley Fair, but she looked forward to watching some football games on the new field. She reported on the outcome of the Salinas Valley Fair which wrapped up yesterday and thanked everyone who supported the exhibitors. She announced the High School Scholarship Night this Wednesday, Memorial Day Ceremony at 9:00am and American Legion barbecue at 11:00am next Monday, and High School Graduation on June 7th. She was excited to hear the Chair Yoga had been extended through June, and thought it was very advantageous for the community to have the use of our pool, so she looked forward to the opening. She also participated in the Senior Mock Interviews today at the High School which was a great experience.

BUSINESS FROM CITY MANAGER

27. Oral Communications
City Manager Gil announced the pool opening on June 10th and the ribbon cutting for the Mural this Thursday at 4:00pm.

Fire Chief Muscio informed of a couple of burns at the slough in the mornings of June 3rd and June 4
th
.

Packet Pg. 36
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of May 19, 2025 6:00 PM (CONSENT AGENDA)

Page 8 of 8 ends

ADJOURNMENT
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Maria Orozco, Council Member
SECONDER: Jose L. Rios, Mayor
AYES: Jose L. Rios, Liz Silva, Scott Funk, Lorraine Worthy, Maria Orozco The meeting was adjourned at 7:46 PM.

ATTEST:

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
Packet Pg. 37
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of May 19, 2025 6:00 PM (CONSENT AGENDA) AGENDA
ITEM
Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: Warrants #52047-52107 (3285 : Approve City Accounts Payable Warrants #52047-52107) 7 Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: Warrants #52047-52107 (3285 : Approve City Accounts Payable Warrants #52047-52107) Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Warrants #52047-52107 (3285 : Approve City Accounts Payable Warrants #52047-52107) Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Warrants #52047-52107 (3285 : Approve City Accounts Payable Warrants #52047-52107) Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Warrants #52047-52107 (3285 : Approve City Accounts Payable Warrants #52047-52107) Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Warrants #52047-52107 (3285 : Approve City Accounts Payable Warrants #52047-52107) Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: Warrants #52047-52107 (3285 : Approve City Accounts Payable Warrants #52047-52107) AGENDA
ITEM
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-29

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GONZALES RECOGNIZING AND CONGRATULATING CARL G. SEDORYK ON HIS 25-YEAR

ANNIVERSARY WITH MONTEREY-SALINAS TRANSIT
WHEREAS, Carl G. Sedoryk began his career with Monterey-Salinas Transit in June 2000 as the Assistant General Manager and transitioned into the role of General Manager/CEO in September 2005; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Sedoryk oversaw many successful MST infrastructure and technology initiatives to better serve passengers and the community including construction of the Marina Transit Exchange, JAZZ bus rapid transit (BRT), RealTime bus arrival system, Mobility Services Center, contactless fare payments, and the future SURF! Busway and BRT; and WHEREAS, Mr. Sedoryk implemented new transit services for the popular visitor-serving Monterey Trolley, service to South County Cities on line 23 Salinas-King City, the Grapevine Express (line 24 Monterey-Carmel Valley), line 55 Monterey-San Jose Express, military serving lines, line 84 King City-Paso Robles, line 59 Salinas-Gilroy, and a major overhaul of the entire transit system with the Better Bus Network; and
WHEREAS, during Carl’s 25 years, MST has been called up to respond to several emergency events and coordinate with the Monterey County Department of Emergency Management including the COVID-19 pandemic and emergency evacuations from fires and floods; and
WHEREAS, during his tenure as the General Manager/CEO, MST has received numerous awards for transportation excellence from the American Public Transportation Association, the California Transit Association, and the Transportation Agency for Monterey County; and WHEREAS, during his 25 distinguished years at MST, Mr. Sedoryk secured over $200M in federal, state, and local grant funding for infrastructure, technology, and service initiatives, managed a budget that contributed $1.5B to the local economy through direct and induced spending, and served more than 100M passengers; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Sedoryk is widely respected as a passionate advocate for public transportation serving our communities and nationally, as a spirited and principled leader, consistently demonstrating a sense of responsibility for the well-being of MST employees and passengers, while championing safety and fairness as core values.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Gonzales hereby:

Recognizes and congratulates Carl G. Sedoryk on his 25-Year Anniversary, and expresses its sincerest appreciation for Carl G. Sedoryk and his tireless commitment to the customers and communities of Monterey County, and congratulate him on reaching this remarkable milestone of public service.

Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-29 (3270 : Resolution No. 2025-29 Recognizing Carl G. Sedoryk) 8 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Gonzales at a regular meeting duly held on the 2
nd day of June 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Jose L. Rios, The Honorable Mayor
ATTEST:

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-29 (3270 : Resolution No. 2025-29 Recognizing Carl G. Sedoryk) City of Gonzales

CITY ATTORNEY

STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor Rios and City Council
DATE: June 2, 2025
FROM: Michael Rodriquez, City Attorney
THROUGH: Carmen Gil, City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 2025-30 Establishing Public Comment Time Limits and Related Procedures

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council consider adoption of Resolution No. 2025-30, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Establishing Public Comment Time Limits and Related Procedures.

BACKGROUND
In 2024, Staff commenced the process of making changes to the Gonzales City Code (GCC) to more accurately reflect the needs of the Council and City Staff. In some cases, the GCC has not been changed in more than fifty years. Council has previously provided Staff with direction to provide options with respect to modifying the public meeting process in order to ensure orderly and efficient meetings as well as Council and public interaction.

Pursuant to the provisions of the Brown Act, the City must allow the public to engage with the Council at noticed public meetings by receiving public comment on both items on the agenda and on matters not on the agenda but within the Council’s jurisdiction during the “public comment” portion of the agenda. In order to provide greater flexibility in the administration of public meetings, the Council directed Staff to prepare an ordinance to eliminate a GCC provision that established the public comment period at three (3) minutes per speaker and to replace the same with language indicating relevant speaker time limits would be set by resolution. This direction was effectuated by Ordinance 2024-147, which was adopted by the Council on January 13, 2025.

AGENDA
ITEM
9 Packet Pg. 47

REVIEW AND ANALYSIS
Per Council direction, staff has prepared a Public Comment Time Limits and Related Procedures Policy for Council consideration and adoption. The Policy establishes a new base time limit of two (2) minutes for comment when there are five speakers or fewer on a given item or during general comment on items not appearing on the agenda. When there are more than five speakers per item, the Mayor will have the discretion to reduce speaker time to not less than one minute.

In most instances the one-minute option would only be used when the Council has a large number of speakers on a given item. Under such circumstances, public comment often tends to be repetitious and has the potential to impede the Council’s timely consideration and action on agendized matters. The ability to limit the duration of public comment would also allow all speakers to be heard without having to wait for a significant period of time. As written, the policy is content neutral and allows reasonable control of the time of a speaker’s comment period based on practical time limitations.

The Policy also includes provisions allowing the Council to request that speakers identify themselves and their residence, allowing the Council to ask commenters questions, and requiring compliance with the City’s Public Meeting Decorum Policy. The Policy will also apply to meetings of any of the City’s boards and commissions.

Explain Recommendation and How it Supports the Vision.

Gonzales will continue to be a safe, clean, family-friendly community, diverse in its heritage, and committed to working collaboratively to preserve and retain its small town charm.

Explain: The proposed Policy should help to ensure that future Council meetings are run in an orderly and efficient manner allowing the Council to continue to pursue and maintain the City vision.

Explain how the Recommendation Directly Implements the Mission The City Council and Staff of the City of Gonzales will realize our Vision by providing the leadership, commitment and resources necessary to provide excellent services that enhance the quality of life of our diverse community. X Yes ____No ____NA Explain: See above.

City services will be delivered in a cost-effective, respectful and friendly manner to ensure the safety and well being of the residents and the promotion of business, recreational, housing and employment opportunities in an environmentally sustainable manner. Yes ___No _X_NA Explain: See above.

Strong fiscal policies allow us to provide appropriate infrastructure for:
• Public Safety Yes ____ No X NA
• Housing Yes ____ No X NA
• Recreation Yes ____ No X NA
Packet Pg. 48
• Environment Yes ____ No X NA
• Education Yes ____ No X NA
Explain: NA

ALTERNATIVES
• Adopt Resolution No. 2025-30.
• Do not adopt the proposed resolution and provide Staff with direction.

BUDGET IMPACT
There is no direct financial impact associated with the proposed resolution.

CONCLUSION
It is recommended that the City Council consider adoption of Resolution No. 2025-30, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Establishing Public Comment Time Limits and Related Procedures.

PUBLIC NOTICE
N/A.

Attachments:

1. Resolution No. 2025-30 wity Policy
Packet Pg. 49
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-30

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GONZALES

ESTABLISHING PUBLIC COMMENT TIME LIMITS

AND RELATED PROCEDURES
WHEREAS, pursuant to provisions of the Brown Act, the City must allow the public to engage with the Council at regular noticed public meetings by receiving public comment on both items on the agenda and on matters not on the agenda but within the Council’s jurisdiction during the “public comment” portion of the agenda; and
WHEREAS, in order to provide more flexibility in the administration of meeting process and decorum, the Council recently adopted Ordinance No. 2024-147 which removed the previous three (3)-minute speaker’s public comment time limit from the City Code and instead added language that time limits would be set by resolution; and WHEREAS, Staff has now prepared a policy concerning new time limits and related procedures for public speakers for the Council’s consideration and approval.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Gonzales that the new “Public Comment Time Limits and Related Procedures Policy,” a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and by this reference incorporated herein, is hereby approved and adopted.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Gonzales at a regular meeting duly held on the 2nd day of June 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Jose L. Rios, The Honorable Mayor
ATTEST:

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-30 wity Policy (3269 : Resolution No. 2025-30 Public Comment Time Limits and Related Procedures)

EXHIBIT A

CITY COUNCIL POLICY

PUBLIC COMMENT TIME LIMITS AND RELATED PROCEDURES
In order to facilitate the orderly receipt of public comment at regular noticed meetings of the Gonzales City Council, the following provisions and procedures have been adopted and will remain in full force and effect until modified:

1. Persons present at meetings of the City Council may comment on individual items on the agenda at the time such items are scheduled to be heard. During regular City Council meetings, comments may be offered on items not on the agenda under that portion of the agenda identified for public comment. Comment may also be made virtually, subject to the same limits and procedures set forth in this policy, or submitted in writing prior to a meeting.

2. The time limit for speakers shall be between 1-2 minutes, depending on the number of speakers. If there are five (5) or fewer speakers on any agenda item, including general public comment on items not on the agenda, the limit for each speaker’s comment shall be two (2) minutes. For agenda items where there are an excess of five (5) speakers, the Mayor may, in his/her discretion, limit the time for each speaker to no less than one (1) minute. Speakers are not allowed to delegate their time to another speaker. The Mayor may limit the total time spent on an item and may continue the item, with the approval of the majority of the Council, to a future meeting at his/her discretion.

3. Upon addressing the Council, each speaker is requested but not required to first state his/her name and the city of residence. While this information helps facilitate the preparation of accurate meeting minutes, provision of the same shall not be a prerequisite to public comment.

4. A Councilmember may ask questions of persons addressing the Council.

5. The Mayor has the right to ask a member of the public to step down if comments are in violation of the Gonzales City Council Public Meeting Decorum Policy. Examples would be a comments in excess of allotted time or comments that disrupt, disturb or otherwise impede the orderly conduct of the meeting.

6. This policy shall also apply to all public meetings conducted by other City boards and commissions, with implementation authority vested in the chairpersons/presidents of such entities.

Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-30 wity Policy (3269 : Resolution No. 2025-30 Public Comment Time Limits and Related Procedures) City of Gonzales

CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT

STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor Rios and City Council
DATE: June 2, 2025
FROM: Carmen Gil, City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 2025-31 Appointing Patrick Dobbins to the SVBGSA Board

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-31, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Appointing Patrick Dobbins to the Salinas Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency Board.

BACKGROUND
The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) was signed into law in 2014 in response to scientific understanding that groundwater in California is being used faster than its being replenished. The act required designated groundwater basins to form a public agency to develop a groundwater management plan and implement actions to help local subbasins reach or maintain groundwater sustainability.

In 2017, local GSA-eligible entities jointly formed the Salinas Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency (SVBGSA) to develop Groundwater Sustainability Plans (GSPs) and manage groundwater in the Salinas Valley according to SGMA. The SVBGSA represents a range of interests including agriculture, cities, public utility, disadvantaged communities, County, and environmental stakeholders.

REVIEW & ANALYSIS
Every three years a new representative is appointed to ensure that the South County’s interests are heard and at the table when the SVBGSA makes decisions. It is now Gonzales’ turn to have a representative on the board, making Director Dobbins the ideal candidate due to his expertise and daily interactions with water issues impacting our basins and the Salinas Valley.

AGENDA
ITEM
10 Packet Pg. 52
Explain Recommendation and How it Supports the Mission
Gonzales will continue to be a safe, clean, family-friendly community, diverse in its heritage, and committed to working collaboratively to preserve and retain its small town charm.

Explain: Ensuring that our interests are represented at the table when agencies like SVBGSA are making decisions is critical as it has the potential to impact our future.

Explain how the Recommendation Directly Implements the Vision The City Council and Staff of the City of Gonzales will realize our Vision by providing the leadership, commitment and resources necessary to provide excellent services that enhance the quality of life of our diverse community. X Yes _____No _____ NA
Explain: See above for explanation.

Strong fiscal policies allow us to provide appropriate infrastructure for:
• Public Safety Yes No X N/A
• Housing Yes No X N/A
• Recreation Yes No X N/A
• Environment X Yes No N/A
• Education Yes No X N/A
Explain: Please see explanation above for the Vision.

ALTERNATIVES
The alternative would be not to have a representative of Gonzales on the board, which is not ideal. Mr.

Dobbins will be a great representative for us and for South County on due to his experience and dealings with local water issues. Representation is important for us so that we can ensure that we have a sustainable source of water well into the future.

BUDGET IMPACT
There is no impact to the budget.

CONCLUSION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2025-31, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Appointing Patrick Dobbins to the Salinas Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency Board.

Attachments:

1. Resolution No. 2025-31
Packet Pg. 53
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-31

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

GONZALES APPOINTING PATRICK DOBBINS TO THE SALINAS

VALLEY BASIN GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AGENCY BOARD
WHEREAS, the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) was signed into law in 2014 in response to scientific understanding that groundwater in California is being used faster than its being replenished; and
WHEREAS, the Act required designated groundwater basins to form a public agency to develop a groundwater management plan and implement actions to help local subbasins reach or maintain groundwater sustainability; and
WHEREAS, in 2017, local GSA-eligible entities jointly formed the Salinas Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency (SVBGSA) to develop Groundwater Sustainability Plans and manage groundwater in the Salinas Valley; and
WHEREAS, SVBGSA represents a range of interests including agriculture, cities, public utility, disadvantaged communities, county and environmental stakeholders; and WHEREAS, every three years, a new representative is appointed to represent South County and our interests; and
WHEREAS, Public Works Director/City Engineer Patrick Dobbins has the expertise to ensure that the South County perspective is at the table when the SVBGSA is making decisions; and
WHEREAS, Director deals with water issues impacting the City and South County on a daily basis through his work as Director of Public Works and City Engineer; and NOW THEREFORE, IT BE RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City of Gonzales hereby appoints Patrick Dobbins as the South County Representative for Gonzales on the Salinas Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency Board of Directors.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Gonzales at a regular meeting duly held on the 2nd day of June 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Jose L. Rios, The Honorable Mayor
ATTEST:

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-31 (3271 : Resolution No. 2025-31 Appointing Patrick Dobbins to the SVBGSA Board) City of Gonzales

CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT

STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor Rios and City Council
DATE: June 2, 2025
FROM: Carmen Gil, City Manager
SUBJECT: Revised Job Description for Development Services Technician/Administrative Analyst

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the revised Job Description for the Development Services Technician/Administrative Analyst Position.

BACKGROUND
The Community Development Technician/Administrative Analyst Position has been vacant since midOctober of 2024. As the City has not yet been successful in two rounds of recruitments for the position, staff has looked more closely into the necessary duties and skills of the position and whether the Job Description was in need of updating.

REVIEW AND ANALYSIS
In closer review of the Job Description for the Community Development Technician/Administrative Analyst Position, staff found that the description was overly wordy and included some duties and skill set requirements that weren’t necessary and may have served as a deterrent to qualified candidates. Staff has attached the existing job description and a revised description for City Council review and concurrence.

Qualitatively, staff wanted to convey that supervision, guidance and on-the job learning should be expected and that the City is ready to accept people willing to learn on-the job. While we still expect proficiencies in writing, math, customer service and working well in a “team” environment, we toned down the appearance that candidates had to “know-it-all.” AGENDA
ITEM
11 Packet Pg. 55
Explain the Recommendation and How it Supports the Vision Gonzales will continue to be a safe, clean, family-friendly community, diverse in its heritage, and committed to working collaboratively to preserve and retain its small-town charm.

Explanation: The revised job Description is intended to be more attractive to job-seeking candidates to assist the City in staffing the long-vacant Community Development Services Technician position. Filling the position will allow the City to continue to support the Vision of the City.

Explain how the Recommendation Directly Implements the Mission The City Council and Staff of the City of Gonzales will realize our Mission by providing the leadership, commitment, and resources necessary to provide excellent services that enhance the quality of life of our diverse community.

Explanation: The revised job Description is intended to be more attractive to job-seeking candidates to assist the City in staffing the long-vacant Community Development Services Technician position. Filling the position will allow the City to continue to support the Mission of the City.

City services will be delivered in a cost-effective, respectful, and friendly manner to ensure the safety and well-being of the residents and the promotion of business, recreational, housing and employment opportunities in an environmentally sustainable manner.

Explanation: See Vision and Mission Statements above.

Strong fiscal policies allow us to provide appropriate infrastructure for:
• Public Safety Yes No X N/A
• Housing Yes No X N/A
• Recreation Yes No X N/A
• Environment Yes No X N/A
• Education Yes No X N/A
Explanation: Not Applicable.

ALTERNATIVES
The City Council may consider not making the revisions to the job description. This is not recommended as these are duties in the description that do not apply to the position.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no impact to the budget with updating the position; therefore, the expense of carrying continued temporary consultant staffing for Building Services activities is not sustainable

CONCLUSION
Packet Pg. 56
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the revised Job Description for the Development Services Technician/Administrative Analyst Position.

Attachments:

1. Revised Development Services Tech-Admin Analyst JD

2. Current Development Services Tech-Admin Analyst JD
Packet Pg. 57
Small town,big heart! ~ ¡Pueblo chico, corazóngrande!
147 Fourth St. · PO Box 647 Gonzales, CA 93926· Phone: (831) 675–5000· Fax: (831) 675-2644 https://gonzalesca.gov/
City of Gonzales
Council Member Scott Funk, Council Member Lorraine Worthy, Council MemberMaria Orozco Mayor Jose L. Rios, Mayor Pro Tem Liz Silva, City Manager Carmen Gil MayScott Funk

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICIAN/ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST

DEFINITION
Under general supervision of the Community Development and Economic Development Director, performs a wide variety of technical, clerical, administrative and customer service duties. Provides information and answers questions from the public; takes in applications and plans; supports the plan review process and the issuance of permits for planning and building services. The position includes data collection and analysis; permit tracking and reporting; and on occasion may make presentations to community groups, commissions and committees; and provides staff support to the Community Development Director, the Planning Commission, the Measure K Committee, and other department heads as assigned.

DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS
The Development Services Technician/Administrative Analyst job class is a professional staff position responsible for participating in a variety of operational/administrative processes. This job class provides moderate to complex analytical and technical skills. The ideal candidate must be capable of planning, organizing, and implementing assigned projects from inception to completion.

It also requires excellent organizational and communications skills, both verbal and in writing in English and Spanish.

ESSENTIAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
• Provide information regarding building, planning, zoning, permit requirements, land use and other related processes to the public, builders, engineers, contractors, and architects at a public counter, on the telephone and via digital media.
• Under the guidance of director, receive and review plan submittals for commercial, industrial, and residential projects for completeness and compliance with City planning regulations and zoning codes.
• Research and assemble information for the preparation of reports; use spreadsheets and basic math.
• Proofread materials for accuracy, completeness, formatting and correct English usage, including grammar, punctuation and spelling.
• Prepare correspondence, reports, forms, receipts, brochures and specialized documents. • Prepare written reports and exhibits for use in public meetings. • Update permit activity information in the City’s database program. • Proofread materials for accuracy, completeness, compliance with departmental polices, formatting and correct English usage, including grammar, punctuation and spelling. • Calculate plan review, inspection and other required fees and collect, record and balance permit-related monetary transactions.
• Maintain records and publications and perform general filing.

Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Revised Development Services Tech-Admin Analyst JD (3273 : Revised Job Description for Development Services • Support the Planning Commission and other commissions, boards and committees as assigned. Occasionally serve as back up to the Deputy City Clerk. • Other duties as assigned.
• Work closely with the Director and other professional staff to issue permits, advance projects and complete reports.

QUALIFICATIONS
Ability to:
• Over time, learn and interpret building and planning division policies and procedures, and land use regulations.
• Communicate orally and in writing with the public.
• Provide information on City Codes, policies, procedures and regulations. • Communicate fluently with peers and colleagues.
• Work effectively with builders, engineers, architects, developers, and the general public. • Accurately review plans for completeness.
• Calculate permit fees in accordance with written ordinances, and policies. • Establish and maintain effective working relationships with individuals from a variety of backgrounds.
• Adjust to rapidly shifting priorities and timelines.
• Work effectively with teams.
• Be fluent with the Spanish language.

Skill in:
• Customer service.
• Basic computer programs, such as excel, word and ppt. • Preparing clear, concise and complete reports and other written materials. • Exercising sound independent judgment within established guidelines. • Basic math.
• Coordinating multiple projects and meeting deadlines. • Maintaining accurate records and files.

EXPERIENCE AND EDUCATION
Experience:

Two years of increasing responsible professional-level administrative and analytical experience in a government agency or equivalent. Ideally, one year or more of experience dealing with development review processes, including plan review, building inspection, zoning, planning, permit issuance and/or other related fields.
-ANDEducation:

BA preferred, or equivalent of an Associate of Arts (AA) degree from an accredited college or with course work in business or public administration or a closely related field.

Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Revised Development Services Tech-Admin Analyst JD (3273 : Revised Job Description for Development Services

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TECHNICIAN/

ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST

DEFINITION
Under general supervision, performs a wide variety of technical, administrative, public information and customer service duties in support of the City’s Community Development, Building, Public Works and City Engineering functions; provides information and answers questions at the public counter and/or by phone and digital media; conducts intake of applications and plans; conducts review and approval of ministerial applications; issues permits for planning, engineering, and building services; conducts fee calculations; conducts remedial data collection and research analysis; assists with permit tracking; prepares reports, makes presentations to community groups, commissions and committees, maintains digital media; provides staff support services to the Planning Commission and other assigned committees; serves as the primary back-up to the Administrative Specialist/Deputy City Clerk; and performs related work as assigned.

DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS
The Development Services Technician/Administrative Analyst job class is a professional staff position responsible for participating in a variety of operational/administrative processes. Positions in this job class may act as a support to an assigned department head, and/or other management staff. Positions within this job class provide moderate to complex analytical, technical, and project management skills. Development Services Technician/Administrative Analyst position must be capable of planning, organizing, and implementing assigned projects from inception to completion. This job class requires excellent organizational and communications skills, both verbal and in writing, and a journey level of expertise in designated functional area in which assigned.

SUPERVISION RECEIVED AND EXERCISED
General supervision in the job class is provided by the Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director. The Development Services Technician/Administrative Analyst may provide technical direction to interns assigned in the designated functional area.

Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Current Development Services Tech-Admin Analyst JD (3273 : Revised Job Description for Development Services

ESSENTIAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
 Provide information regarding building, planning, zoning, permit requirements, land use and other related processes to the public, builders, engineers, contractors, and architects at a public counter, on the telephone and via digital media.
 Interpret and apply City ordinances, rules and regulations related to the development process.
 Perform plan review on initial submittals for commercial, industrial, and residential projects for completeness and compliance with City zoning and planning regulations including building and zoning codes.  Research and assemble information from a variety of sources for the preparation of reports or completion of forms; uses spreadsheets and makes arithmetic and statistical calculations.
 Proofread materials for accuracy, completeness, compliance with departmental polices, formatting and correct English usage, including grammar, punctuation and spelling.
 Prepare correspondence, reports, forms, receipts, brochures and specialized documents from drafts, notes, brief instructions, corrected copy or prior materials using a personal computer.
 Prepare written reports and exhibits for use in a variety of public meetings and hearings.
 Review plans and issue appropriate permits, such as single family photovoltaic systems and commercial sign permits.
 Updates permit activity information in specialized database or via a permit management tracking program.
 Perform initial check of parcel maps, subdivisions, and various other drawings.  Prepare and verify the accuracy of computations and plot information obtained from plans; check lot dimensions and street widths against recorded map.  Prepare written reports and correspondence, including Zoning Verification letters, and post public notices.
 Calculate plan review, inspection and other required fees and collect, record and balance permit-related monetary transactions.
 Maintain records and publications, including both residential and commercial plan libraries and perform general filing.
 Staff the Planning Commission and other commissions, boards and committee’s as assigned. Serve as the primary back-up to the City’s Administrative Specialist/Deputy City Clerk, which includes all work duties.  Verify complaints received from the public with regard to violations of the City’s Zoning Ordinance.
 Other related duties as determined by the City’s Deputy City Manager/Community Development Director.

Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: Current Development Services Tech-Admin Analyst JD (3273 : Revised Job Description for Development Services

QUALIFICATIONS
Knowledge of:
 Local zoning practices, City Code, policies and procedures as they apply to assigned permitting responsibilities.
 Methods of gathering and compiling data.
 Property descriptions and graphic displays.
 Customer service principles and techniques.
 Methods, instruments, and symbols used in mapping, property descriptions, and other graphic materials.
 Planning approval and building permit processes and procedures, specification requirements, construction practices, and cost estimating.  Uniform Building Codes, State Energy Regulations.

Ability to:
 Learn and interpret City building permit and planning policies and procedures; construction, design, land use regulations and ordinances; and Zoning Districts, Special Planning Districts and Overlay zones.
 Explain both orally and in writing technical information to the public, specifically City Codes, policies, procedures and regulations.
 Deal effectively with builders, engineers, architects, developers, and the general public regarding all relevant codes, planning policies and regulations.  Accurately review plans for completeness and calculate permit fees in accordance with established laws, ordinances, and policies.  Understand and interpret legal property descriptions, topographic drawings, and maps.
 Communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing.  Establish and maintain effective working relationships with others.  Adjust to rapidly shifting priorities and timelines.
 Work effectively with multidisciplinary teams.

Skill in:
 Using a variety of computer software programs, including skill in maintaining electronic files, retrieve and research information from electronic files and databases.
 Basic math skills including ability to use scales and ability to calculate areas using scaled plans.
 Preparing clear, concise and complete reports and other written materials.  Maintaining accurate records and files.
 Coordinating multiple projects and meeting critical deadlines.  Exercising sound independent judgment within established guidelines.

Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: Current Development Services Tech-Admin Analyst JD (3273 : Revised Job Description for Development Services

EXPERIENCE AND EDUCATION
Experience:

Two years of increasing responsible professional-level administrative and analytical experience in a government agency performing administrative and technical support duties, with a minimum of one year of experience dealing with aspects of the development process, including plan review, building inspection, zoning, planning, permit issuance and/or other related fields.
-ANDEducation:

Possession of a Bachelor’s degree from an accredited college or university with course work in business or public administration or a closely related field.

Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: Current Development Services Tech-Admin Analyst JD (3273 : Revised Job Description for Development Services City of Gonzales

CITY ATTORNEY

STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor Rios and City Council
DATE: June 2, 2025
FROM: Michael Rodriquez, City Attorney
THROUGH: Carmen Gil, City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolutions Providing Preliminary Approval of Engineer's Reports and Setting Date for Approval of Levy and Collection of Assessments

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council consider and adopt:

1. Resolution No. 2025-32 Designating Engineer of Work and District Counsel;

2. Resolutions No. 2025-33 and 2025-34 regarding California Breeze Assessment Districts;

3. Resolutions No. 2025-35 and 2025-36 regarding Canyon Creek Assessment Districts;

4. Resolutions No. 2025-37 and 2025-38 regarding Industrial Park Assessment Districts; and

5. Resolutions No. 2025-39 and 2025-40 regarding Cipriani Assessment Districts.

BACKGROUND
The City has a number of established assessment districts in various locations throughout the City, formed in accordance with the provisions of the Lighting and Landscaping Act of 1972 or the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982. These districts serve to provide funds to finance the costs associated with the maintenance of district improvements. By law (the aforesaid Acts and California Constitution Article XIIID), the City is required to schedule hearings to set the annual assessments for each district. As has been the practice for a number of years, consulting City Engineer Harris & Associates has prepared Engineer’s Reports containing information about each of the assessment districts, the improvements to be served through the collection of the assessments, and the actual amount of each assessment on each impacted parcel. Copies of the Engineer’s Reports were filed with the City Clerk on or about May 23, 2025, and are available for review upon request.

REVIEW & ANALYSIS
AGENDA
ITEM
12-20
Packet Pg. 64
The attached resolutions designate the “Engineer of Work” and District Counsel for the districts, provide for preliminary approval of the Engineer’s Reports for each of the identified assessment districts, declare the Council’s intent to confirm the district diagrams and levy assessments, and set a public hearing date of Monday, July 21, 2025, for consideration, approval and levying of the assessments.

With the exception of the California Breeze Districts, which do not have an allowable CPI inflator, the Maximum Assessment in each District is adjusted by the applicable CPI for the previous year. The Maximum Assessment in each District represents the maximum assessment that can be imposed in a given year. This year, the CPI was 1.270% and it is recommended that all Maximum Assessments be adjusted accordingly.

There is no proposed change in the assessments from last year for any of the California Breeze and Canyon Creek assessment districts. In the Cipriani development, the Parks and Open Spaces assessment will remain the same as the assessment set in FY 2024-2025, while in the Benefit Assessment Districts there will be no change to the assessments for Lots 1-7 and a decrease in the assessment from $750 to $678 for Lots 8-66 and 70-75. In the Industrial Park, assessments in the Parks and Landscape District will increase from $440 to $575 per acre, while in the Benefit Assessment District there will be an increase from $1,305 to $1,500 per acre. The new assessments have been set to adequately address involved maintenance, labor and material costs, and project costs in the coming fiscal year.

Explain Recommendation and How it Supports the Vision
Gonzales will continue to be a safe, clean, family-friendly community, diverse in its heritage, and committed to working collaboratively to preserve and retain its small town charm.

Explain: The assessments fund the maintenance of various improvements located within the involved subdivisions. Regular and routine maintenance of such improvements helps to preserve the safe and attractive environment the City strives to provide for its citizens.

Explain how the Recommendation Directly Implements the Mission The City Council and Staff of the City of Gonzales will realize our Vision by providing the leadership, commitment and resources necessary to provide excellent services that enhance the quality of life of our diverse community. X Yes No
Explain: Collection of the assessments will provide financing for the maintenance of a variety of improvements that enhance the quality of life in both the involved subdivisions and the City as a whole.

City services will be delivered in a cost-effective, respectful and friendly manner to ensure the safety and well being of the residents and the promotion of business, recreational, housing and employment opportunities in an environmentally sustainable manner. X Yes No Explain: The proposed assessments will allow the City to maintain a variety of improvements that ensure residential safety and promote local housing opportunities by maintaining a healthy housing stock.

Strong fiscal policies allow us to provide appropriate infrastructure for:
• Public Safety X Yes No NA
• Housing X Yes No NA
• Recreation Yes No X NA
• Environment Yes No X NA
• Education Yes No X NA
Packet Pg. 65
Explain: The creation and annual collection of assessments enables the City to maintain improvements vital to public safety and the ongoing well-being of portions of the City’s housing stock.

ALTERNATIVES
None at this time.

BUDGET IMPACT
The City will have to incur the cost of subdivision maintenance, or allow the same to lapse, if the assessments are not approved and levied.

CONCLUSION
The Council should initiate the first step in its annual process of considering and levying assessments in various assessment districts in the City by adopting the attached resolutions. Said assessments provide the City with the means of covering the costs of maintenance responsibilities for improvements in each district.

Attachments:

1. Resolutions No. 2025-32-40
Packet Pg. 66

Page 1 of 2 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-32

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GONZALES

DESIGNATING HARRIS & ASSOCIATES AS ENGINEER OF WORK FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS, AND DIRECTING THE FILING OF ENGINEER’S FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026 ANNUAL REPORTS THEREFOR; DESIGNATING JARVIS FAY LLP AS DISTRICT COUNSEL FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS; AND

AUTHORIZING COMPENSATION FOR ALL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WORK WHEREAS, the City of Gonzales is charged with the responsibility of taking all necessary efforts to establish annual assessments for various Benefit Assessment Districts and Parks and Open Space Landscape Maintenance Assessment Districts within the City; and WHEREAS, as part of the aforesaid duty, the City is charged with designating the Engineer of Work and District Counsel for each district, and authorizing payment of the same; and
WHEREAS, once an Engineer of Work has been designated, the City is responsible for directing the Engineer to prepare annual reports for each assessment district for subsequent use in setting assessments.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Gonzales as follows:

1. Harris & Associates, Marina, California, is designated by the Council as the Engineer of Work for:

California Breeze Benefit Assessment District Nos. 1, 2 and 3, California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District, Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Nos. 1, 2 and 3, Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District Nos. 1, 2 and 3, Gonzales Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District,
Gonzales Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District, Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District,
Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District, and is hereby directed to file an annual report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 for each of said districts.

2. Compensation in connection with the provision of engineering services, including the preparation of annual engineer’s reports, shall be made to Harris & Associates from relevant assessment proceeds pursuant to that agreement for consulting services previously entered into with the City entitled “Consulting Service Agreement Between the City of Gonzales and Harris & Associates for Professional Engineering Services” and dated December 1, 2014, and any and all amendments thereto.

Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-32 (3274 : Resolution No. 2025-32 Assessment Districts Designating Engineer and Council)

Page 2 of 2 ends

3. Jarvis Fay LLP shall serve as District Counsel for:

California Breeze Benefit Assessment District Nos. 1, 2 and 3, California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District, Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Nos. 1, 2 and 3, Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District Nos. 1, 2 and 3, Gonzales Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District,
Gonzales Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District, Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District,
Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District.

4. Compensation in connection with the provision of legal services shall be made to Jarvis Fay LLP from relevant assessment proceeds pursuant to that agreement for legal services previously entered into with the City entitled “Legal Services Agreement” dated 2011, and all amendments thereto. Consideration for such services has previously been established at $210.00 an hour. Jarvis Fay LLP has certified that it has no interest, either direct or contingent, in any property or contract arising from or affected by the assessment districts, except as counsel pursuant to this Resolution. Jarvis Fay LLP does not represent any owner of property within the proposed boundaries of the assessment districts and has not received a fee from any source for services connected therewith.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Gonzales at a regular meeting duly held on the 2
nd day of June, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

Jose L. Rios, The Honorable Mayor
ATTEST:

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-32 (3274 : Resolution No. 2025-32 Assessment Districts Designating Engineer and Council)

Page 2 of 3 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-33

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GONZALES

DECLARING INTENTION TO CONFIRM DIAGRAMS AND TO LEVY AND

COLLECT ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS PURSUANT TO THE
BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1982
CALIFORNIA BREEZE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2 AND 3 WHEREAS, it is the intention of the Gonzales City Council (the “Council”) to confirm the diagram for and to levy and collect assessments in the California Breeze Benefit Assessment District No. 1, California Breeze Benefit Assessment District No. 2, and California Breeze Benefit Assessment District No. 3 for the purpose of maintaining, operating and/or servicing of public lands and improvements for parks and open space purposes pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 (the “Act”), being Title 5, Part 1, Division 2, Chapter 6.4 of the California Government Code (commencing with Section 54703), and as provided by Article XIIID of the California Constitution; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, Harris & Associates, the designated Engineer of Work of the City of Gonzales (the “City”) has filed with the City Clerk an Engineer’s Report (the “Report”) for the Districts called for under said Act; and WHEREAS, the Council has given preliminary consideration to the Report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said Report is sufficient, and that neither said Report, nor any part thereof requires or should be modified in any respect.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Gonzales as follows:

1. The Council hereby finds that the public interest and convenience requires, and as such declares its intention to levy and collect assessments against the assessable lots and parcels of land within the Districts referenced herein for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, all pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 and Article XIIID of the California Constitution.

2. The public improvements and lands to be maintained, operated and/or serviced are generally described in the California Breeze Benefit Assessment Districts No. 1, 2, and 3 Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, incorporated herein by reference.

3. The proposed assessment districts are designated by the following distinctive names: California Breeze Benefit Assessment District No. 1, California Breeze Benefit Assessment District No. 2, and California Breeze Benefit Assessment District No. 3. The assessment districts are generally described as follows:

California Breeze Benefit Assessment District No. 1 - a district bounded on the east by Herold Parkway, on the west by US Route 101, on the south by a line approximately 3200 feet south of Fifth Street, and on the north by Fifth Street.

Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-33 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Diagrams) AGENDA
ITEM
13

Page 3 of 3 ends

California Breeze Benefit Assessment District No. 2 - a district bounded on the east by Herold Parkway, on the west by US Route 101, on the south by a line approximately 4300 feet south of Fifth Street, and on the north by California Breeze Phase I.

California Breeze Benefit Assessment District No. 3 - a district bounded on the east by Herold Parkway, on the west by US Route 101, on the north by a line approximately 4300 feet south of Fifth Street, and on the south by a line approximately 5100 feet south of Fifth Street.

4. Reference to the Engineer’s Report, on file with the City Clerk, is hereby made for a full and detailed description of the public improvements, the boundaries of the assessment districts, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the assessment districts.

5. It is ordered that Monday, July 21, 2025, at 6:00 p.m., in the regular meeting place of said Council, Council Chambers, 117 Fourth Street, Gonzales, California, is hereby appointed and fixed for the public hearing and time and place when and where the Council will consider and act upon the Engineer’s Report, confirm the District diagrams, and the levy of the proposed assessments.

6. The City Clerk is directed to give notice of the hearing by one publication of a copy of this Resolution of Intention in the local newspaper published and circulated in said City, pursuant to Section 6061 of the California Government Code.

7. The proposed assessments will not increase from the assessments established for the Districts for Fiscal Year 2024-2025.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Gonzales duly held on the 2
nd day of June, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Jose L. Rios, The Honorable Mayor
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-33 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Diagrams)

Page 4 of 3 ends

ATTEST:

I, the undersigned Deputy City Clerk, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the City Council of the City of Gonzales, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2
nd day of June, 2025, by the above-stated vote of the members thereof, a majority being present.

Dated: June 2, 2025
Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-33 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Diagrams)

CITY OF GONZALES
PRELIMINARY ENGINEER’S REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

CALIFORNIA BREEZE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO.’S 1, 2 & 3
FUND #280, 290 & 300
JULY 2025

PREPARED BY
Harris & Associates
450 Lincoln Avenue, Suite 103
Salinas, CA 93901
www.weareharris.com
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

CALIFORNIA BREEZE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
City of Gonzales
Monterey County
State of California

APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CALIFORNIA BREEZE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF GONZALES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON THE _____ DAY OF _________, 2025.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with me on the ________day of ______________, 2025.

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
City of Gonzales, Monterey County, CA
_________________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Gonzales, California on the ________day of ______________, 2025.

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
City of Gonzales, Monterey County, CA
__________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Monterey on the ________day of ______________, 2025.

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
City of Gonzales, Monterey County, CA
__________________________
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
Certifications…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………i Statement of Assessment Engineer…………………………………………………………………………………..….1 Plans and Specifications……………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Estimate of Costs………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….7 District Diagram…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..10 Method of Apportionment………………………………………………………………………………………………….11 Appendix A – 2024-25 Financial Summary ………………………………………………………………………….15 Appendix B – Assessment Roll ………………………………………………………………………………………..….16 Appendix C – District Diagram …………………………………………………………………………………………...25 Appendix D – Capital Replacement …………………………………………………………………………………….30 Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
1 STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
Statement of Assessment Engineer
AGENCY: CITY OF GONZALES
PROJECT: CALIFORNIA BREEZE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
TO: THE CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF GONZALES

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
The preparation of this Annual Engineer’s Report (“Report”) is in conformance with the obligation of the City Council for the California Breeze Benefit Assessment District of the City of Gonzales to provide drainage services upon each lot or parcel of land in the district in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel of land for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, Chapter 6.4 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code (the “1982 Act”), Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the State of California Constitution, and in accordance with the City of Gonzales’ Resolution adopted by the City Council, this Report has been ordered for:

CALIFORNIA BREEZE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
(Hereinafter referred to as the “District”),
I, Alison Bouley, authorized representative of the District, the duly appointed Assessment Engineer submit the following Report which consists of the following four (4) parts and Appendices:

PART I
Description of Improvements: This part provides a general description of improvements proposed to be maintained in the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are on file with the City.

PART II
Estimate of Cost: This part contains the cost estimate of the proposed maintenance including incidental costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
2 PART III
District Diagram: This part incorporates a Diagram of the District showing the external boundaries of the District. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Monterey County Assessor for the year in which this Report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. The District Diagram is filed under separate cover with the City Clerk.

PART IV
Method of Apportionment of the Assessments: This part describes the method of apportionment of assessments, based upon parcel classification of land within the District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received. The costs and expenses of the District have been assessed upon the parcels of land within the boundaries of District pursuant to the initial methodology established by Resolution No. 95-45 approved on the 4th day of April, 1995. For particulars as to the identification of parcels, reference is made to the District Diagram.

Appendices
Appendix A – Financial Summary
Appendix B – Assessment Roll
Appendix C – District Diagram
Appendix D – Capital Replacement
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed to the lots and parcels within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the services provided.

DATED this day of July, 2025
___________________________________________
Alison Bouley, P.E., Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. No. C61383
Engineer of Work
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
3 PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Plans and Specifications

INTRODUCTION
City Staff has contracted with Harris & Associates (“Harris”) to complete the annual administration process for all of City’s assessment districts. In addition to this required annual process, Harris has conducted an assessment district fund balance and capital asset replacement cash flow analysis to confirm and ensure that the City’s assessment districts annually assess property owners only for the essential funding to complete ongoing maintenance activities and finance timely capital replacement as assets reach the end of their useable lifecycles.

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICTS
CALIFORNIA BREEZE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, PHASE 1
Benefit Assessment District Phase 1 (hereinafter “BAD Phase 1”) was formed in 1995 to provide a dedicated source of funding for the maintenance of various street sweeping, streetlights and lighting costs, storm drain lines repairs and replacement including necessary cleaning, electric current, supervision, debris removal and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for the proper maintenance and operation thereof. BAD Phase 1 also provides funding for the maintenance of a Retention Pond and appurtenant access road. Incidental costs including contingencies, and assessment district incidentals including engineering, printing, and notices to property owners, collection costs, legal fees, administration and supervision, are assessed to BAD Phase 1 on the same basis as the improvements specified above and drainage facilities within development projects in the City. New developments within the City have been required to annex to BAD Phase 1 as a condition of approval. The assessments and methods of apportionment described in this Report utilize commonly accepted assessment engineering practices and have been calculated and proportionately spread to each parcel based on the special benefits received as approved by the City Council at the time BAD Phase 1 was formed.

BAD Phase 1 is generally bounded on the east by Herold Parkway, on the west by State Route 101, on the south by a line approximately 3,200 feet south of Fifth Street and on the north by Fifth Street.

CALIFORNIA BREEZE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, PHASE 2
Benefit Assessment District No. 2 (hereinafter “BAD Phase 2”) was formed in 1995 to provide a dedicated source of funding for the maintenance and operation of the following described improvements of a local nature on public lands within said district including sweeping, street lights and lighting costs, storm drain lines repairs and replacement, cleaning, flushing, electric current, supervision, debris removal and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for the proper maintenance and operation thereof.

Incidental costs including contingencies, and assessment district incidentals including engineering, printing, and notices to property owners, collection costs, legal fees, administration and supervision, are assessed to BAD Phase 2 on the same basis as the improvements specified above. The assessments and methods of apportionment described in this Report utilize commonly accepted assessment engineering practices and have been calculated and proportionately spread to each parcel based on the special benefits received as approved by the City Council at the time BAD Phase 2 was formed.

Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
4 BAD Phase 2 is generally bounded on the east by Herold Parkway, on the west by State Route 101, on the south by a line approximately 4,300 feet south of Fifth Street and on the north by California Breeze Phase I.

CALIFORNIA BREEZE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PHASE 3
Benefit Assessment District No. 3 (hereinafter “BAD Phase 3”) was formed in 1995 to provide a dedicated source of funding for the maintenance and operation of the following described improvements of a local nature on public lands within said district including sweeping, street lights and lighting costs, storm drain lines repairs and replacement cleaning, flushing, electric current, supervision, debris removal and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for the proper maintenance and operation thereof. BAD Phase 3 also provides funding for the maintenance of a Retention Pond and appurtenant access road. Incidental costs including contingencies, and assessment district incidentals including engineering, printing, and notices to property owners, collection costs, legal fees, administration and supervision, are assessed to BAD Phase 3 on the same basis as the improvements specified above. The assessments and methods of apportionment described in this Report utilize commonly accepted assessment engineering practices and have been calculated and proportionately spread to each parcel based on the special benefits received as approved by the City Council at the time BAD Phase 3 was formed.

BAD Phase 3 is generally bounded on the east by Herold Parkway, on the west by State Route 101, on the north by a line approximately 4,300 feet south of Fifth Street and on the south by a line approximately 5,100 feet south of Fifth Street.

COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
Assessments are levied annually pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, Chapter 6.4 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code (“1982 Act”). All assessments described in this Report and approved by the City Council are prepared in accordance with the 1982 Act. BAD 1, BAD 2 and BAD 3 do not include an annual cost escalation factor.

Any future increase in excess of the approved maximum assessments for BAD 1, BAD 2 or BAD 3 will require the approval of a majority of the property owners in accordance with the requirements of Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California (“Article XIIID”) and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act.

SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AND EXPENDITURES
Approval of the proposed assessment covered by this Engineer’s Report will generate the revenue necessary to:

A. Provide for the continued maintenance and future rehabilitation of the items listed below. Maintenance may include but is not limited to: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of the specified improvements. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District.

California Breeze BAD Phase 1
1) Sweeping
2) Street Lights and Lighting Costs
3) Storm Drain Lines
4) Retention Pond Maintenance
5) Access Road Maintenance
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
5 6) Administrative Services (Internal Support)
As generally defined by the 1982 Act, maintenance and servicing of the improvements may include one or any combination of the following:
1) Cleaning
2) Repairs/Replacement
3) Flushing
4) Debris Removal
5) Electric current
6) Incidental Costs
California Breeze BAD Phase 2
1) Sweeping
2) Street Lights and Lighting Costs
3) Storm Drain Lines (repairs and replacement only)
As generally defined by the 1982 Act, maintenance and servicing of the improvements may include one or any combination of the following:
1) Cleaning
2) Repairs/Replacement
3) Flushing
4) Debris Removal
5) Electric current
6) Incidental Costs
California Breeze BAD Phase 3
1) Sweeping
2) Street Lights and Lighting Costs
3) Storm Drain Lines (repairs and replacement only)
4) Retention Pond
5) Access road
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
6 As generally defined by the 1982 Act, maintenance and servicing of the improvements may include one or any combination of the following:
1) Cleaning
2) Repairs/Replacement
3) Flushing
4) Debris Removal
5) Electric current
6) Incidental Costs
Pursuant to the 1982 Act:

B. "Maintain" or "maintenance" means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement.
"Service" or "servicing" means the furnishing of electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other improvements.

Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
7 PART II – ESTIMATE OF COSTS
Estimate of Costs
All improvements within the Districts are maintained and serviced on a regular basis. Based upon the available revenues generated by the assessment, City staff determines the frequency and specific maintenance operations which can be provided in a given year.

The proposed budget is shown on the following page. This includes an estimate of the costs of utilities, operations, services, administration and maintenance associated with the improvements within the Districts, including all labor, personnel, equipment, materials and administrative expenses. The budget summary also shows the estimated fund balance and the projected fund reserves that will be available and may be required based upon the estimated expenditures and assessment revenue.

Beginning in Fiscal Year 2021-22, the City combined the budget page to show only the total expenditures, revenues, etc. for the District, rather than showing the expenditures and revenues by individual phases of the development, as had been done in previous years.

Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
8 Annual Budget

EXPENDITURES
Maintenance and Servicing
Percolation Pond Maintenance 1
$332
Access Road Maintenance $332
Street Sweeping 2
$0
Street Repairs (pot holes) $0
Maintenance and Servicing Subtotal $664
Utilities $15,061
Capital Replacement/Repair Collection 3
Percolation Pond Dredging $7,500
Access Road Resurfacing $2,500
Street Resurfacing and Street Sign Replacement $25,000
Street Repair $0
Street Lighting Repair $5,000
Storm Drain Repair $7,500
Capital Replacement/Repair Subtotal $47,500
Capital Outlay $0
District Administration
City Staff (YE Transfers GF) $14,000
City Administration $3,500
City Labor and Overhead 4
$19,018
Engineering (Surveys & Assessment) $4,229
Supplies, Printing & Advertising Notices $1,422
Legal Counsel $1,500
Legal and Accounting Services $0
County Collection Fee $166
Contingency $0
District Administration Subtotal $43,835
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $107,060

REVENUES & ADJUSTMENTS
Actual/Estimated Assessments $66,322
Actual/Estimated Use of Money and Property (Interest) $1,530 Transfer (To)/From Fund Balance $39,208
TOTAL REVENUES & ADJUSTMENTS $107,060
OPERATING RESERVE FUND BALANCE 5
Estimated Balance 7/1/2025 $53,530
Estimated Addition/(Reduction) $0
Estimated Interest Income $641
Estimated Balance 6/30/2026 $54,171

CAPITAL RESERVE FUND BALANCE
Estimated Balance 7/1/2025 $95,008
Estimated Addition/(Reduction) $0
Estimated Interest Income $889
Estimated Balance 6/30/2026 $95,897
ANNUAL LEVY SUMMARY 6
Total SFR Parcels Levied 317
Total SFR EDUs 317.00
Maximum Assessment per EDU Varies*
Assessment per EDU Varies*
Assessment Needed to Fully Fund Varies*
Total Commercial Parcels Levied 2
Total Commercial EDUs 12.93
Maximum Assessment per EDU $141.14
Assessment per EDU $141.14
Assessment Needed to Fully Fund $196.90
Definitions: SFR = Single Family Residential Parcel(s); EDU = Equivalent Dwelling Unit * Refer to Budget Footnotes for Assessment Rates for each phase Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
9 A slurry seal project was completed for the District during the 2022 calendar year, using $50,000 from the Capital Reserve fund.

Budget Footnotes
1 Phases I & II utilize one percolation pond. Phase III utilizes a separate retention pond. 2 Regularly scheduled street sweeping services are performed by Franchise Waste Hauler at no cost to the District.

Any services above and beyond said regularly scheduled services will be billed to and paid for the the District 3 The cost for capital replacement reserve for the items shown below are from the City's FY 2018/19 approved budget.

Item Phase I Phase II Phase II
Percolation Pond Dredging $3,000 $0 $20,004
Street Repair $0 $0 $0
Street Lighting Repair $3,000 $0 $18,912
Storm Drain Repair $0 $0 $20,004
Sound Wall Maintenance Reserve $3,000 $0 $0
Reserve collections from the Budget page are lower because the current assessment rate cannot support higher collection amounts.

See Appendix D for detailed cost breakdown for these items. 4 Items included in this category include salaries, overtime, Workers's Comp, Retirement & Insurance (Life, Health & FICA). 5 6
Phase 1 SFR (single family residential) Maximum Assessment $187.01. Actual Assessment $187.00. Assessment Needed to Fully Fund $272.08 Phase 1 COM (commercial) Maximum Assessment $141.14. Actual Assessment $141.14. Assessment Needed to Fully Fund $196.90 Phase 2 SFR Maximum Assessment $185.35. Actual Assessment $185.34. Assessment Needed to Fully Fund $212.47 Phase 3 SFR Maximum Assessment $234.68. Actual Assessment $234.68. Assessment Needed to Fully Fund $448.45 Beginning in Fiscal Year 2017/18, a Capital Reserve Fund was established for the District. The amounts collected for the current year, if any, are shown in the Budget table above. The Beginning Balances for the Capital Reserve Funds were initially transferred from the Operating Reserve Fund.

The amounts in the Operating Reserve Funds should be sufficient to pay for the operations and maintenance costs for the first six months of the fiscal year. Any addition to or (reduction from) the Capital Reserve Fund will be shown and calculated annually in the same manner as the Operating Reserve Fund. Also, any funds collected for Capital Reserve, and not spent, will be included in the ending Capital Reserve fund balance the following year. Currently, the District Assessments do not have the capacity to collect any reserve amounts. Assessments must be increased in order to begin collecting funds for Capital improvement projects.

The California Breeze Benefit Assessment District has 3 separate phases. The assessment amounts for each are as follows:

Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
10 PART III – DISTRICT DIAGRAM
District Diagram
The boundaries of the California Breeze Benefit Assessment District are shown on the map in Appendix B. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions as shown on the maps of the Monterey County Assessor for the year in which this Report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. The District Diagram is also filed under separate cover with the City Clerk.

Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
11 PART IV – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
Method of Apportionment
GENERAL PROVISIONS – SPECIAL BENEFIT
Pursuant to the 1982 Act and Article XIIID, all parcels that receive a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5, of the Government Code, the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, permits the establishment of assessment districts by Cities for the purpose of providing certain public improvements that include street maintenance.

Section 54711 of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states:
(a) No benefit assessment shall be levied pursuant to this chapter unless it meets all of the following requirements:
(1) The amount of the assessment imposed on any parcel of property shall be related to the benefit to the parcel which will be derived from the provision of the service. Except as provided in subdivision (d) or (e) of Section 54715, in the case of a benefit assessment for flood control services, the benefit must be determined on the basis of the proportionate storm water runoff from each parcel. In the case of an assessment for the maintenance of streets, roads, or highways, the benefit shall be in proportion to the estimated traffic volume to be generated by each parcel assessed, or by any other reasonable basis as determined by the legislative body. (2) The annual aggregate amount of the assessment shall not exceed the estimated annual cost of providing the service.
(3) The revenue derived from the assessment shall not be used to pay the cost of any service other than the service for which the assessment was levied.

The 1982 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district.

Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways.

The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. The costs for the operation, maintenance and servicing of the improvements maintained for each zone are apportioned in accordance with the methodology which was established by the City Council upon formation of the Districts.

Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
12 GENERAL PROVISIONS – GENERAL BENEFIT
Although the improvements may include public streets and drainage facilities that connect to similar facilities outside the Districts’ boundaries, the construction, maintenance and operation of these improvements are only necessary for the development of properties within the Districts. As such, these improvements were not required nor necessarily desired by any properties or developments outside the Districts’ boundaries and any public access or use of the improvements by others is incidental. Therefore, it has been determined that the ongoing maintenance, servicing and operation of the District’s improvements provide no measurable general benefit to properties outside the Districts or to the public at large, but clearly provide distinct and special benefits to properties within the Districts.

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
Method of Assessment – BAD Phase 1
All costs associated with the maintenance and operation of BAD Phase 1 improvements including Engineer’s Report, printing and advertising of assessment notices, County collection fees and legal fees shall be spread to all parcels on a pro-rata development unit basis.

One hundred percent (100%) of all costs associated with the maintenance and operation of the BAD 1 improvements including incidentals and appurtenances is of special benefit to parcels within the district and shall be spread to all developed parcels within the District on a pro-rata development unit basis. Developed parcels are those parcels on which final map has been filed. Said parcels are also abutting or obtaining primary access from a public street.

Undeveloped parcels without an approved tentative Map shall be assessed for zero (0) the total of potential development units.

Factored development unit calculations for residential areas are as follows: Low Density residential = 1.0 Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU)
Office and commercial use is assessed based on an equivalent basis of 3.8 EDUs per acre using the gross parcel area. The resulting parcel A area, as shown on the assessment diagram, is assessed at 13.6 EDUs.

Monterey County charges 0.25% of the levy amount for collection for administration of the District.

Proposed and existing community or neighborhood park lands are of special benefit to parcels within Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3, and are not assessed (Parcels B and C), as shown on the assessment diagram. The detention pond, Parcel B, which is for the exclusive use of this development, is not assessed.

The neighborhood park, Parcel C, was a development requirement, and was constructed by this development.

The assessment costs for the operation; maintenance and servicing of the improvements are apportioned in accordance with the methodology which was established by the City Council upon formation of the District. It was determined at that time that the most equitable method for spreading the estimated benefit received by each parcel in BAD Phase 1 should be based on the EDU method. One parcel within the boundaries of BAD Phase 1 is designated under a commercial land use. While the residential parcels will be assessed on the basis of one EDU per parcel, the commercial parcel will be assessed four (4) EDU per acre. The formula is as follows:

Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
13 Method of Assessment – BAD Phase 2
All costs associates with the maintenance and operation of BAD Phase 2 improvements including Engineer’s Report, printing and advertising of assessment notices, County collection fees and legal fees all of which shall be spread to all parcels on a prorata development unit basis.

One hundred percent (100%) of all costs associates with the maintenance and operation of the BAD Phase 2 improvements including incidentals and appurtenances is of special benefit to parcels within the District and shall be spread to all developed parcels within the District on a pro-rata development unit basis. Developed parcels are those parcels on which final map has been filed. Said parcels are also abutting or obtaining primary access from a public street.

Unit calculations for residential areas are as follows: Low Density Residential = 1.0 Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU).

The assessment costs for the operation, maintenance, and servicing of the improvements are apportioned in accordance with the methodology which was established by the City Council upon formation of the District. It was determined at that time that the most equitable method for spreading the estimated benefit received by each parcel in BAD Phase 2 should be based on the EDU method. The formula is as follows:

Method of Assessment – BAD Phase 3
All costs associates with the maintenance and operation of BAD Phase 3 improvements, including Engineer’s Report, printing and advertising of assessment notices, County collection fees and legal fees, all of which shall be spread to all parcels on a prorata development unit basis.

One hundred percent (100%) of all costs associates with the maintenance and operation of the BAD Phase 3 improvements, including incidentals and appurtenances is of special benefit to properties within the District and shall be spread to all developed parcels within the District on a pro-rata development unit basis. The neighborhood park was constructed by this development for the benefit of this development. Developed Parcels are those parcels on which a final map has been filed. Said parcels are also abutting or obtaining primary access from a public street.

Factored development unit calculations for residential areas are as follows: Low Density residential = 1.0 Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU).

LANDUSE PARCELS

DWELLING

UNITS ACRES
EDU
FACTOR
TOTAL

EDU RATE/EDU TOTAL ASMT
RESIDENTIAL 131 131 n/a 1.00 131.00 $185.34 $24,279.54
BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PHASE 2 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT CALCULATION Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
14 Parcels owned by the City of Gonzales are not assessed, which include Parcel “A”, right-of-way reservation, right-of-way for a future grade separation structure, and Parcel “B”, the retention pond site, which was constructed to serve this development.

The assessment costs for the operation, maintenance, and servicing of the improvements are apportioned in accordance with the methodology which was established by the City Council upon formation of the District. It was determined at that time that the most equitable method for spreading the estimated benefit received by each parcel in BAD Phase 3 should be based on the EDU method. The formula is as follows:

LANDUSE PARCELS

DWELLING

UNITS ACRES
EDU
FACTOR
TOTAL

EDU RATE/EDU TOTAL ASMT
RESIDENTIAL 114 114 n/a 1.00 114.00 $234.68 $26,753.52
BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PHASE 3 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT CALCULATION Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

15 APPENDIX A – FINANCIAL SUMMARY
2024-25 Financial Summary
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

16 APPENDIX B – ASSESSMENT ROLL
Assessment Roll
The proposed assessment and the amount of the assessment apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the latest roll at the Assessor’s Office, is shown in Appendix A. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the Assessor of the County of Monterey and those records are, by reference, made part of this report. The assessments shown will be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller and included on the property tax bill for each parcel shown in the assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
17 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County Collection
Fee Total Assessment
020-281-001-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-002-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-003-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-004-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-005-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-006-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-007-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-008-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-009-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-010-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-011-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-012-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-013-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-014-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-015-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-016-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-017-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-018-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-019-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-020-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-021-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-022-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-023-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-024-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-025-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-026-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-027-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-028-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-029-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-030-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-031-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-032-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-033-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-034-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-035-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
18 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County Collection
Fee Total Assessment
020-281-036-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-037-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-038-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-039-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-040-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-041-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-042-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-043-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-044-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-045-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-046-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-047-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-048-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-049-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-050-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-051-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-052-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-053-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-054-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-055-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-056-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-057-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-058-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-059-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-060-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-061-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-062-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-063-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-064-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-065-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-066-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-067-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-068-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-069-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-070-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-071-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-072-000 I 1.00 $186.53 $0.47 $187.00
020-281-073-001 I 0.00 $186.53 $0.00 $0.00
020-281-074-000 I 0.00 $186.53 $0.00 $0.00
020-281-075-000 I 0.00 $186.53 $0.00 $0.00
020-281-078-000 I 2.19 $140.79 $0.77 $309.46
020-281-081-000 I 10.74 $140.79 $3.78 $1,515.70
TOTALS 84.93 $15,289.16
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
19 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County Collection
Fee Total Assessment
020-291-001-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-291-002-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-291-003-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-291-004-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-291-005-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-291-006-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-291-007-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-291-008-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-291-009-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-291-010-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-291-011-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-291-012-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-291-013-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-291-014-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-291-015-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-292-001-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-292-002-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-292-003-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-292-004-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-292-005-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-292-006-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-292-007-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-292-008-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-292-009-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-292-010-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-292-011-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-292-012-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-292-013-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-292-018-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-292-019-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-292-020-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-292-021-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-292-022-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-292-023-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-292-024-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-292-025-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-292-026-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-292-027-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-292-028-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-292-029-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-293-001-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-293-002-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

20 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County Collection
Fee Total Assessment
020-293-003-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-293-004-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-293-005-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-293-006-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-293-007-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-293-008-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-293-009-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-293-010-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-293-011-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-293-012-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-293-013-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-293-014-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-293-015-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-294-001-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-294-002-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-294-003-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-294-004-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-294-005-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-294-006-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-294-007-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-294-008-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-294-010-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-301-001-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-301-002-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-301-003-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-301-004-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-301-005-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-301-006-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-301-007-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-301-008-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-301-009-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-301-010-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-301-011-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-301-012-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-301-013-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-301-014-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-301-015-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-301-016-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-301-017-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-301-018-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-301-019-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-301-020-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-301-021-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-301-022-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

21 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County Collection
Fee Total Assessment
020-301-023-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-301-024-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-301-025-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-302-001-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-302-002-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-302-003-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-302-004-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-302-005-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-302-006-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-302-007-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-302-008-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-302-009-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-302-010-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-302-011-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-302-012-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-302-013-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-302-014-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-302-015-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-302-016-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-302-017-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-302-018-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-302-019-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-302-020-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-303-001-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-303-002-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-303-003-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-303-004-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-303-005-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-303-006-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-303-007-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-303-008-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-303-009-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-303-010-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-303-011-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-303-012-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-303-013-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-303-014-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-303-015-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-303-016-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-303-017-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-303-018-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-303-019-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-303-020-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-303-021-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
020-303-022-000 II 1.00 $184.88 $0.46 $185.34
TOTALS 131.00 $24,279.54
Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
22 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County Collection
Fee Total Assessment
020-311-001-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-002-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-003-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-004-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-005-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-006-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-007-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-008-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-009-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-010-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-011-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-012-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-013-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-014-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-015-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-016-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-017-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-018-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-019-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-020-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-021-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-022-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-023-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-024-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-025-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-026-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-027-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-028-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-311-029-000 III 0.00 $234.10 $0.00 $0.00
020-311-030-000 III 0.00 $234.10 $0.00 $0.00
020-312-001-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-312-002-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-312-003-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-312-004-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-312-005-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-312-006-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-312-007-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-312-008-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-312-009-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-312-010-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-312-011-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-312-012-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
23 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County Collection
Fee Total Assessment
020-312-013-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-312-014-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-312-015-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-312-016-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-312-017-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-312-018-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-312-019-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-312-020-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-312-021-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-312-022-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-001-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-002-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-003-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-004-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-005-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-006-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-007-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-008-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-009-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-010-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-011-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-012-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-013-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-014-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-015-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-016-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-017-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-018-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-019-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-020-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-021-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-022-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-023-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-024-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-025-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-026-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-027-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-028-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-029-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-030-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-031-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-032-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-033-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-313-034-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
24 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County Collection
Fee Total Assessment
020-314-001-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-002-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-003-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-004-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-005-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-006-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-007-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-008-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-009-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-010-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-011-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-012-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-013-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-014-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-015-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-016-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-017-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-018-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-019-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-020-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-021-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-022-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-023-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-024-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-025-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-026-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-027-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-028-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-029-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
020-314-030-000 III 1.00 $234.10 $0.59 $234.68
TOTALS 114.00 $26,753.52
Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 25 APPENDIX C – DISTRICT DIAGRAMS District Diagrams
Diagrams for the District, including each Phase of the California Breeze Development, are shown on the following pages.

Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 26 Packet Pg. 100
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 27 Packet Pg. 101
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 28 Packet Pg. 102
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 29 Packet Pg. 103
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 30 APPENDIX D – CAPITAL REPLACEMENT Capital Replacement The following pages show a summary of the Capital Replacement costs for each District within the City, as well as the Capital Replacement detail of each identified item for this District.

Packet Pg. 104
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Benefit Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 31 Packet Pg. 105
Attachment: Ca Breeze Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3275 : Resolution No. 2025-33 Ca Breeze Benefit RESOLUTION NO. 2025-34

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GONZALES PROVIDING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF ENGINEER’S REPORT,

STATING INTENTION TO CONFIRM DIAGRAM AND TO LEVY AND

COLLECT ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS PURSUANT TO THE
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972

CALIFORNIA BREEZE PARKS AND OPEN SPACES

MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the Gonzales City Council (the “Council”) to confirm the diagram for and to levy and collect assessments in the California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District for the purpose of maintaining, operating and/or servicing of public lands and improvements for parks and open space purposes pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the “Act”), being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (commencing with Section 22500) and as provided by Article XIIID of the California Constitution; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, Harris & Associates, the designated Engineer of Work of the City of Gonzales (the “City”) has filed with the City Clerk an Engineer’s Report (the “Report”) for the District called for under said Act; and WHEREAS, the Council has given preliminary consideration to the Report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said Report is sufficient, and that neither said Report, nor any part thereof requires or should be modified in any respect.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Gonzales as follows:

1. With respect to the California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, the Council finds:
• That the plans and specifications in said Report be, and they are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed.
• That the Engineer’s itemized and total costs and expenses of said maintenance, operation and/or servicing of public lands and improvements and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said Report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed.
• That the diagram showing the assessment district and the boundaries and dimensions of the respective subdivisions of land within said assessment district be, and are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed.

Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-34 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Diagrams) AGENDA
ITEM
14 • That the proposed assessments upon the several subdivisions of land in said assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such subdivisions, respectively, from said maintenance, operation and/or servicing of public lands and improvements, and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said Report, be, and they are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed.
• That the maps and descriptions of the lands and easements to be acquired, if any, contained in said Report be, and the same are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed.
• That the proposed maximum annual assessments upon each of the several subdivisions of land in the assessment district to pay costs incurred by the City and not otherwise reimbursed which result from the administration and collection of assessments, as contained in said Report be, and the same are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed.
• That said Report is preliminarily approved and confirmed as a whole and shall stand as the Engineer’s Report for the purpose of all subsequent proceedings.

2. The Council hereby finds that the public interest and convenience requires, and as such declares its intention to levy and collect assessments against the assessable lots and parcels of land within the District referenced herein for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, all pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Article XIIID of the California Constitution.

3. The public improvements and lands to be maintained, operated and/or serviced are generally described in the California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, incorporated herein by reference.

4. The involved assessment district is generally described as follows:

California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District - a district bounded on the east by Herold Parkway, on the west by US Route 101, on the south by a line approximately 5100 feet south of Fifth Street and on the north by Fifth Street.

5. Reference to the Engineer’s Report, on file with the City Clerk, is hereby made for a full and detailed description of the public improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the assessment district.

6. It is ordered that Monday, July 21, 2025, at 6:00 p.m., in the regular meeting place of said Council, Council Chambers, 117 Fourth Street, Gonzales, California, is hereby appointed and fixed for the public hearing and time and place when and where the Council will Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-34 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Diagrams) consider and act upon the Engineer’s Report, confirm the District diagram, and the levy of the proposed assessment.

7. The City Clerk is directed to give notice of the hearing by one publication of a copy of this Resolution in the local newspaper published and circulated in said City, pursuant to Section 6061 of the California Government Code.

8. The proposed assessments will not increase from the assessments established for said Districts for Fiscal Year 2024-2025.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Gonzales duly held on the 2nd day of June, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Jose L. Rios, The Honorable Mayor
ATTEST:

I, the undersigned Deputy City Clerk, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the City Council of the City of Gonzales, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2
nd day of June, 2025, by the above-stated vote of the members thereof, a majority being present.

Dated: June 2, 2025
Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-34 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Diagrams)

CITY OF GONZALES
PRELIMINARY ENGINEER’S REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

CALIFORNIA BREEZE PARKS & OPEN SPACE
DISTRICT NO.’S 1, 2 & 3
FUND #270
JULY 2025

PREPARED BY
Harris & Associates
450 Lincoln Avenue, Suite 103
Salinas, CA 93901
www.weareharris.com
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

CALIFORNIA BREEZE PARKS AND OPEN SPACES
City of Gonzales
Monterey County
State of California

APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CALIFORNIA BREEZE PARKS AND OPEN SPACES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF GONZALES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON THE _____ DAY OF _________, 2025.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with me on the ________day of ______________, 2025.

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
City of Gonzales, Monterey County, CA
_________________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Gonzales, California on the ________day of ______________, 2025.

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
City of Gonzales, Monterey County, CA
__________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Monterey on the ________day of ______________, 2025.

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
City of Gonzales, Monterey County, CA
__________________________
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
Certifications…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………i Statement of Assessment Engineer…………………………………………………………………………………..….1 Plans and Specifications……………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Estimate of Costs………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….6 District Diagram…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...8 Method of Apportionment……………………………………………………………………………………………………9 Appendix A – 2024-25 Financial Summary ………………………………………………………………………….12 Appendix B – Assessment Roll ………………………………………………………………………………………..….13 Appendix C – District Diagram …………………………………………………………………………………………...20 Appendix D – Capital Replacement …………………………………………………………………………………….25 Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
1 STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
Statement of Assessment Engineer
AGENCY: CITY OF GONZALES
PROJECT: California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces
TO: THE CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF GONZALES

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
The preparation of this Annual Engineer’s Report (“Report”) is in conformance with the obligation of the City Council for the California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces District of the City of Gonzales to provide drainage services upon each lot or parcel of land in the district in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel of land for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 22500) (“Act”), Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the State of California Constitution, and in accordance with the City of Gonzales’ Resolution adopted by the City Council, this Report has been ordered for:

CALIFORNIA BREEZE PARKS AND OPEN SPACES
(Hereinafter referred to as the “District”),
I, Alison Bouley, authorized representative of the District, the duly appointed Assessment Engineer submit the following Report which consists of the following four (4) parts and Appendices:

PART I
Description of Improvements: This part provides a general description of improvements proposed to be maintained in the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are on file with the City.

PART II
Estimate of Cost: This part contains the cost estimate of the proposed maintenance including incidental costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
2 PART III
District Diagram: This part incorporates a Diagram of the District showing the external boundaries of the District. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Monterey County Assessor for the year in which this Report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. The District Diagram is filed under separate cover with the City Clerk.

PART IV
Method of Apportionment of the Assessments: This part describes the method of apportionment of assessments, based upon parcel classification of land within the District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received. The costs and expenses of the District have been assessed upon the parcels of land within the boundaries of District pursuant to the initial methodology established by Resolution No. 95-44 approved on the 4th day of April, 1995. For particulars as to the identification of parcels, reference is made to the District Diagram.

Appendices
Appendix A – Financial Summary
Appendix B – Assessment Roll
Appendix C – District Diagram
Appendix D – Capital Replacement
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed to the lots and parcels within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the services provided.

DATED this day of July, 2025
___________________________________________
Alison Bouley, P.E., Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. No. C61383
Engineer of Work
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

3 PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Plans and Specifications

INTRODUCTION
City Staff has contracted with Harris & Associates (“Harris”) to complete the annual administration process for all of City’s assessment districts. In addition to this required annual process, Harris has conducted an assessment district fund balance and capital asset replacement cash flow analysis to confirm and ensure that the City’s assessment districts annually assess property owners only for the essential funding to complete ongoing maintenance activities and finance timely capital replacement as assets reach the end of their useable lifecycles.

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICTS
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District is generally described as a district bounded on the east by Herold Parkway, on the west by State Route 101, on the south by a line approximately 5,100 feet more or less, south of Fifth Street and on the north by Fifth Street.

The District was formed in 1995 to provide a dedicated funding source for the maintenance and operation of any or all public landscaping and irrigation improvements, of a local nature, on landscaped strips of land adjacent to curbs of the following described streets, including jogging paths, planter walls, grass berms, retention ponds and bank protection, appurtenant irrigation systems; ornamental plantings including lawns, shrubs, and trees; including necessary repairs, replacements, water, electric current, spraying, care, supervision, debris removal and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for the proper maintenance and operation thereof. Incidental costs including contingencies, and assessment district incidentals including engineering, printing, and notices to property owners, collection costs, legal fees, administration and supervision, are assessed to the District on the same basis as the improvements specified above.

All additions, improvements and enlargements thereto which may hereafter be made on the following described work:

Herold Parkway, a strip of land approximately 20 feet in width from face of west curb lines including planter walls from Fifth Street southerly 5,000 feet more or less; thence Westerly 750 feet more or less to Charolais Drive. A strip of land including a grass berm approximately 15 feet in width east of the face of easterly curb along the east side of Herold Parkway from Fifth Street southerly 5,100 feet more or less.

Pedestrian path and landscape easement 20 feet wide along the southerly boundary of Parcel A from the pedestrian easement on the west, easterly 500 feet more or less to Herold Parkway.

Retention Pond, Parcel “E” and appurtenant access and irrigation as said parcel as shown on that certain amended map titled “California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District, Exhibit A” on file with the City Clerk.

Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
4 State Route 101, a strip of land 5 feet wide along the western boundary of subdivision adjacent to Route 101 including appurtenant sound wall as shown on that certain amended map entitled “California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District, (Annexation of California Breeze Phase III), Exhibit A” on file with the City Clerk.

SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AND EXPENDITURES
A summary of the assessments to be levied is shown in the table below.

Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

5 LEVEL OF MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROVIDED
Approval of the proposed assessment set forth in the Engineer’s Report will generate the revenue necessary to provide for all costs associated with the maintenance and operation of the District improvements including the assessment calculation (Engineer’s Report), printing and advertising of assessment notices, County collection fees and legal fees all of which shall be spread to all parcels on a pro-rata development unit basis.

One hundred percent (100%) of all costs associated with the maintenance and operation of the California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces improvements including incidentals and appurtenances is of special benefit to parcels within the district and shall be spread to all parcels within the District on a development unit basis. The park was constructed as a requirement of this development to serve the 331-lot subdivision development.

Pursuant to the 1972 Act:
"Maintain" or "maintenance" means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement.
"Service" or "servicing" means the furnishing of electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other improvements.

Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

6 PART II – ESTIMATE OF COSTS
Estimate of Costs
All improvements within the Districts are maintained and serviced on a regular basis. Based upon the available revenues generated by the assessment, City staff determines the frequency and specific maintenance operations which can be provided in a given year.

The proposed budget is shown on the following page. This includes an estimate of the costs of utilities, operations, services, administration and maintenance associated with the improvements within the Districts, including all labor, personnel, equipment, materials and administrative expenses. The budget summary also shows the estimated fund balance and the projected fund reserves that will be available and may be required based upon the estimated expenditures and assessment revenue.

Beginning in Fiscal Year 2021-22, the City combined the budget page to show only the total expenditures, revenues, etc. for the District, rather than showing the expenditures and revenues by individual phases of the development, as had been done in previous years.

Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
7 Annual Budget

EXPENDITURES
Maintenance and Servicing
Contractual Services (Park Maintenance) 1
$15,000
Parkway & Percolation Pond Maintenance 2
$7,500
Utilities $13,670
Sound Wall Annual Maintenance $1,000
Maintenance and Servicing Subtotal $37,170
Capital Replacement/Repair Collection 3
Sound Wall Maintenance Reserve $0
Sound Wall Reserve $0
Tree Removal and Street Repair $0
Capital Replacement/Repair Subtotal $0
Capital Outlay $0
District Administration
City Staff (YE Transfers GF) $8,500
City Administration $0
City Labor and Overhead 4
$31,531
Engineering (Surveys & Assessment) $0
Supplies, Printing & Advertising Notices $483
Legal Counsel $500
Legal and Accounting Services $0
County Collection Fee $196
Contingency $0
District Administration Subtotal $41,209
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $78,379

REVENUES & ADJUSTMENTS
Actual/Estimated Assessments $78,211
Actual/Estimated Use of Money and Property $168
Park Reservations $0
Transfer (To)/From Fund Balance ($0)
TOTAL REVENUES & ADJUSTMENTS $78,379
OPERATING FUND BALANCE 5
Estimated Balance 7/1/2025 ($303,528)
Estimated Addition/(Reduction) $0
Estimated Interest Income $0
Estimated Balance 6/30/2026 ($303,528)

CAPITAL RESERVE FUND BALANCE
Estimated Balance 7/1/2025 $0
Estimated Addition/(Reduction) $0
Estimated Interest Income $0
Estimated Balance 6/30/2026 $0
ANNUAL LEVY SUMMARY 6
Total SFR Parcels Levied 317
Total SFR EDUs 317.00
Maximum Assessment per EDU Varies*
Assessment per EDU Varies*
Assessment Needed to Fully Fund $237.56
Total Commercial Parcels Levied 2
Total Commercial EDUs 12.93
Maximum Assessment per EDU $88.90
Assessment per EDU $88.90
Assessment Needed to Fully Fund $252.83
Definitions: SFR = Single Family Residential Parcel(s); EDU = Equivalent Dwelling Unit * Refer to Budget Footnotes for Assessment Rates for each phase Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
8 Budget Footnotes
1 2
3 4
5 6
Phases 1 & 2 SFR parcels Maximum Assessment $227.01. Actual Assessment $227.00. Assessment Needed to Fully Fund $236.12 Phase 1 COM (commercial) Maximum Assessment $88.90. Actual Assessment $88.90. Assessment Needed to Fully Fund $252.83 Phase 3 SFR Maximum Assessment $271.77. Actual Assessment $271.76. Assessment Needed to Fully Fund $238.40 Commercial parcel does not benefit from park improvement or Phase III parkway improvement; only benefits from Phase I/II parkway improvement. Includes costs for landscape contractor, Smith & Enright.

Items included in this category include salaries, overtime, Workers's Comp, Retirement & Insurance (Life, Health & FICA).

Reserve collections from the Budget page are lower than shown in Appendix D because the current assessment rate cannot support higher collection amounts.

The California Breeze Landscape Maintenance District has 3 separate phases. The assessment amounts for each are as follows:

Beginning in Fiscal Year 2017/18, a Capital Reserve Fund was established for the District. The amounts collected for the current year, if any, are shown in the Budget table above. The Beginning Balances for the Capital Reserve Funds were initially transferred from the Operating Reserve Fund. The amounts in the Operating Reserve Funds should be sufficient to pay for the operations and maintenance costs for the first six months of the fiscal year. Any addition to or (reduction from) the Capital Reserve Fund will be shown and calculated annually in the same manner as the Operating Reserve Fund. Also, any funds collected for Capital Reserve, and not spent, will be included in the ending Capital Reserve fund balance the following year. Currently, the District Assessments do not have the capacity to collect any reserve amounts. Assessments must be increased in order to begin collecting funds for Capital improvement projects.

Expenditures for the percolation pond for Phase I & II & commercial serves only these areas. The percolation pond for Phase III only serves Phase III and thus is assessed separately.

The cost for capital replacement reserve for the items shown in Appendix D, Capital Reserve Replacement Study which was completed in FY 2017/18. Tree replacement and street repair was added to the Budget for 2019/20.

Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

9 PART III – DISTRICT DIAGRAMS
District Diagram
The boundaries of the California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces District are shown on the map in Appendix C. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions as shown on the maps of the Monterey County Assessor for the year in which this Report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. The District Diagram is also filed under separate cover with the City Clerk.

Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

10 PART IV – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
Method of Apportionment

GENERAL PROVISIONS
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value:
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.” The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on estimated benefit to each parcel.

BENEFIT ANALYSIS
Each of the improvements have been carefully reviewed by the City and the corresponding assessments have been proportionately spread to each parcel based on improvements as determined at the time the District was established.

General Benefits
The improvements within this District are a direct result of property development within the District and would otherwise not be required or necessary. Developers typically install landscape improvements to enhance the marketability and value of properties within the development and/or as conditions of development. In either case, the improvements are clearly installed for the benefit of the properties developed and not for the benefit of surrounding properties.

Although many landscape improvements (by virtue of their location), may be visible to surrounding properties or to the public at large, any benefit to surrounding properties is incidental and cannot be considered a direct and special benefit to those properties. Therefore, it has been determined that the improvements within this District and the ongoing operation and maintenance of those improvements are clearly a direct and special benefit to properties within the District.

Unless otherwise noted, these improvements provide no measurable general benefit to properties outside the District or to the public at large.

Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
11 Special Benefits
The method of apportionment (assessment methodology) approved at the time the District was formed is based on the premise that each of the assessed parcels within the District receives benefit from the improvements maintained and financed by annual assessments. Specifically, the assessments are for the maintenance of local landscape improvements installed as part of the original improvement. The desirability and safety of properties within the District are enhanced by the presence of well-maintained landscaping. The special benefits associated with the local landscaping improvements are specifically:
• Enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements. • Improved aesthetic appeal of properties within the District providing a positive representation of the area.
• Enhanced adaptation of the urban environment within the natural environment from adequate green space and landscaping.
• Increased sense of pride in ownership of property within the District resulting from wellmaintained improvements associated with the properties.

All of the preceding special benefits contribute to a specific enhancement and desirability of each of the assessed parcels within the District.

Non-Assessable Parcels
Within the boundaries of the District, there are properties that are considered to receive no special benefit from the District improvements and are therefore not assessed. Parcels owned by the City of Gonzales are not assessed.

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The District is assessed on the basis of total development units generated for the costs of the maintenance and operation of the District including incidentals and appurtenances and shall include all the costs of maintaining and/or operating the improvements described herein.

All costs associated with the maintenance and operation of the District improvements including Engineer’s Report, printing and advertising of assessment notices, County collection fees, and legal fees shall be spread to all parcels on a pro-rata development unit basis.

One hundred percent (100%) of all costs associated with the maintenance and operation of the California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces (Annexation of California Breeze Phase III) improvements including incidentals and appurtenances is of special benefit to parcels within the district and shall be spread to all parcels within the District on a development unit basis. The park was constructed as a requirement of this development to serve the 331- lot subdivision development.

Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
12 Developed parcels are those parcels on which final subdivision map has been filed, and which can obtain building permits as of the Public Hearing date. Said parcels are also abutting or obtaining primary access from a public street.

Factored development unit calculations are as follows: Low Density Residential = 1.0 Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU); Office and commercial use is assessed based on an equivalent basis of 3.8 EDUs per acre using the gross parcel area. The resulting parcel “A” area, as shown on the assessment diagram, is assessed at 13.6 EDUs. There is no assessment for park maintenance for the Office and commercial use parcels.

Monterey County charges 0.25% of the levy amount for collection for administration of the District.

Parcels owned by the City of Gonzales are not assessed, which include Parcel “A”, right-of-way reservation, rightof-way for a future grade separation structure, and Parcel “B”, the retention pond site, which was constructed to serve this development. These parcels receive no benefit from the maintenance and servicing of the improvements.

The District assessments have no annual escalation factor, meaning the assessment rates are fixed. In order for the assessments to be increased, the property owners must approve the increase through a Proposition 218 ballot procedure.

Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
13 APPENDIX A – FINANCIAL SUMMARY
2024-25 Financial Summary
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

14 APPENDIX B – ASSESSMENT ROLL
Assessment Roll
The proposed assessment and the amount of the assessment apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the latest roll at the Assessor’s Office, is shown in Appendix A. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the Assessor of the County of Monterey and those records are, by reference, made part of this report. The assessments shown will be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller and included on the property tax bill for each parcel shown in the assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

15 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County Collection
Fee Total Assessment
020-281-001-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-002-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-003-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-004-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-005-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-006-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-007-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-008-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-009-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-010-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-011-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-012-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-013-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-014-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-015-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-016-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-017-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-018-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-019-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-020-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-021-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-022-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-023-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-024-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-025-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-026-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-027-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-028-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-029-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-030-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-031-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-032-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-033-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-034-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-035-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
16 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County Collection
Fee Total Assessment
020-281-036-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-037-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-038-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-039-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-040-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-041-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-042-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-043-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-044-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-045-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-046-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-047-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-048-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-049-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-050-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-051-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-052-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-053-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-054-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-055-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-056-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-057-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-058-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-059-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-060-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-061-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-062-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-063-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-064-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-065-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-066-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-067-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-068-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-069-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-070-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-071-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-072-000 I 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-281-074-000 I 0.00 $226.43 $0.00 $0.00
020-281-075-000 I 0.00 $226.43 $0.00 $0.00
020-281-077-000 I 0.00 $226.43 $0.00 $0.00
020-281-078-000 I 2.19 $194.42 $0.49 $194.92
020-281-081-000 I 10.74 $952.30 $2.39 $954.68
TOTALS 84.93 $17,493.60
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
17 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County Collection
Fee Total Assessment
020-291-001-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-291-002-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-291-003-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-291-004-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-291-005-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-291-006-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-291-007-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-291-008-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-291-009-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-291-010-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-291-011-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-291-012-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-291-013-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-291-014-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-291-015-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-292-001-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-292-002-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-292-003-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-292-004-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-292-005-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-292-006-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-292-007-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-292-008-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-292-009-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-292-010-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-292-011-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-292-012-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-292-013-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-292-018-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-292-019-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-292-020-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-292-021-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-292-022-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-292-023-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-292-024-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-292-025-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-292-026-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-292-027-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-292-028-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-292-029-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-293-001-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-293-002-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
18 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County Collection
Fee Total Assessment
020-293-003-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-293-004-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-293-005-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-293-006-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-293-007-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-293-008-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-293-009-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-293-010-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-293-011-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-293-012-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-293-013-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-293-014-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-293-015-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-294-001-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-294-002-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-294-003-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-294-004-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-294-005-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-294-006-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-294-007-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-294-008-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-294-010-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-301-001-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-301-002-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-301-003-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-301-004-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-301-005-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-301-006-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-301-007-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-301-008-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-301-009-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-301-010-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-301-011-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-301-012-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-301-013-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-301-014-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-301-015-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-301-016-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-301-017-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-301-018-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-301-019-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-301-020-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-301-021-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-301-022-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
19 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County Collection
Fee Total Assessment
020-301-023-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-301-024-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-301-025-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-302-001-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-302-002-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-302-003-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-302-004-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-302-005-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-302-006-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-302-007-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-302-008-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-302-009-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-302-010-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-302-011-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-302-012-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-302-013-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-302-014-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-302-015-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-302-016-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-302-017-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-302-018-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-302-019-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-302-020-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-303-001-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-303-002-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-303-003-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-303-004-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-303-005-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-303-006-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-303-007-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-303-008-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-303-009-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-303-010-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-303-011-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-303-012-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-303-013-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-303-014-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-303-015-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-303-016-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-303-017-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-303-018-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-303-019-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-303-020-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-303-021-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
020-303-022-000 II 1.00 $226.43 $0.57 $227.00
TOTALS 131.00 $29,737.00
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
20 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County Collection
Fee Total Assessment
020-311-001-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-002-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-003-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-004-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-005-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-006-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-007-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-008-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-009-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-010-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-011-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-012-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-013-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-014-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-015-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-016-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-017-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-018-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-019-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-020-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-021-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-022-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-023-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-024-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-025-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-026-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-027-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-028-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-311-029-000 III 0.00 $271.08 $0.00 $0.00
020-311-030-000 III 0.00 $271.08 $0.00 $0.00
020-312-001-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-312-002-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-312-003-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-312-004-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-312-005-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-312-006-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-312-007-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-312-008-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-312-009-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-312-010-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-312-011-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-312-012-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
21 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County Collection
Fee Total Assessment
020-312-013-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-312-014-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-312-015-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-312-016-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-312-017-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-312-018-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-312-019-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-312-020-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-312-021-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-312-022-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-001-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-002-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-003-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-004-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-005-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-006-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-007-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-008-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-009-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-010-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-011-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-012-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-013-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-014-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-015-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-016-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-017-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-018-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-019-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-020-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-021-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-022-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-023-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-024-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-025-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-026-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-027-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-028-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-029-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-030-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-031-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-032-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-033-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-313-034-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
22 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County Collection
Fee Total Assessment
020-314-001-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-002-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-003-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-004-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-005-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-006-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-007-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-008-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-009-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-010-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-011-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-012-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-013-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-014-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-015-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-016-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-017-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-018-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-019-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-020-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-021-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-022-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-023-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-024-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-025-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-026-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-027-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-028-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-029-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
020-314-030-000 III 1.00 $271.08 $0.68 $271.76
TOTALS 114.00 $30,980.64
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 23 APPENDIX C – DISTRICT DIAGRAMS District Diagrams
Diagrams for the District, including each Phase of the California Breeze Development, are shown on the following pages.

Packet Pg. 134
Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 24 Packet Pg. 135
Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 25 Packet Pg. 136
Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 26 Packet Pg. 137
Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 27 Packet Pg. 138
Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 28 APPENDIX D – CAPITAL REPLACEMENT Capital Replacement The following pages show a summary of the Capital Replacement costs for each District within the City, as well as the Capital Replacement detail of each identified item for this District.

Packet Pg. 139
Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS Engineer’s Report
California Breeze Parks and Open Spaces City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 29 Packet Pg. 140
Attachment: Ca Breeze POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3276 : Resolution No. 2025-34 Ca Breeze P&OS RESOLUTION NO. 2025-35

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GONZALES

OF INTENTION TO CONFIRM DIAGRAM AND TO LEVY AND

COLLECT ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS PURSUANT TO THE
BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1982
CANYON CREEK BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2 AND 3 WHEREAS, it is the intention of the Gonzales City Council (the “Council”) to confirm the diagram for and to levy and collect assessments in the Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District No. 1, the Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District No. 2, and the Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District No. 3 for the purpose of maintaining, operating and/or servicing of public lands and improvements for parks and open space purposes pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 (the “Act”), being Title 5, Part 1, Division 2, Chapter 6.4 of the California Government Code (commencing with Section 54703) an as provided by Article XIIID of the California Constitution; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, Harris & Associates, the designated Engineer of Work of the City of Gonzales (the “City”) has filed with the City Clerk an Engineer’s Report (the “Report”) for the Districts called for under said Act; and WHEREAS, the Council has given preliminary consideration to the Report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said Report is sufficient, and that neither said Report, nor any parts thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Gonzales as follows:

1. The Council hereby finds that the public interest and convenience requires, and as such declares its intention to levy and collect assessments against the assessable lots and parcels of land within the districts referenced herein for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, all pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 and Article XIIID of the California Constitution.

2. The public improvements and lands to be maintained, operated and/or serviced are generally described in the Engineer’s Report for Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District No. 1 for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District No. 2 for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, and Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District No. 3 for Fiscal Year 2025- 2026, incorporated herein by reference.

3. The proposed assessment districts are generally described as follows:

Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District No. 1 – a district bounded on the northeast by Fanoe Road, on the southwest by US Route 101, on the southeast by the Sunrise Ranch Subdivision and on the northwest by Canyon Creek Phase II Subdivision.

Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-35 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Diagrams) AGENDA
ITEM
15 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District No. 2 – a district bounded on the northeast by Fanoe Road, on the southwest by Canyon Creek Phase I Subdivision and Canyon Creek Phase III Subdivision, on the southeast by Canyon Creek Phase I and on the northwest by Canyon Creek Phase III Subdivision.

Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District No. 3 – a district bounded on the east by Herold Parkway, on the west by State Route 101, on the north by a line approximately 4,300 feet south of Fifth Street and on the south by a line approximately 5,100 feet south of Fifth Street.

4. Reference to the Engineer’s Report, on file with the City Clerk, is hereby made for a full and detailed description of the public improvements, the boundaries of each assessment district, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the assessment districts.

5. It is ordered that Monday, July 21, 2025, at 6:00 p.m., in the regular meeting place of said Council, Council Chambers, 117 Fourth Street, Gonzales, California, is hereby appointed and fixed for the public hearing and time and place when and where the Council will consider and act upon the Engineer’s Report, confirm the District diagrams, and the levy of the proposed assessments.

6. The City Clerk is directed to give notice of the hearing by one publication of a copy of this Resolution of Intention in the local newspaper published and circulated in said City, pursuant to Section 6061 of the California Government Code.

7. The proposed assessments in Districts 1, 2 and 3 will not increase from the assessments established for the Districts in Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The District Maximum Assessment will be adjusted by the CPI, set at 1.270%.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Gonzales duly held on the 2nd day of June, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Jose L. Rios, The Honorable Mayor
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-35 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Diagrams) ATTEST:

I, the undersigned Deputy City Clerk, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the City Council of the City of Gonzales, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2
nd day of June, 2025, by the above-stated vote of the members thereof, a majority being present.

Dated: June 2, 2025
Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-35 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Diagrams)

CITY OF GONZALES
PRELIMINARY ENGINEER’S REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

CANYON CREEK BENEFIT ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO.’S 1, 2 & 3
FUND #304
JULY 2025

PREPARED BY
Harris & Associates
60 W. Alisal Street, Suite 200
Salinas, CA 93901
www.weareharris.com
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

CANYON CREEK BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
City of Gonzales
Monterey County
State of California

APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CANYON CREEK BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF GONZALES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON THE _____ DAY OF _________, 2025.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with me on the ________day of ______________, 2025.

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
City of Gonzales, Monterey County, CA
_________________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Gonzales, California on the ________day of ______________, 2025.

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
City of Gonzales, Monterey County, CA
__________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Monterey on the ________day of ______________, 2025.

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
City of Gonzales, Monterey County, CA
__________________________
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
Certifications…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………i Statement of Assessment Engineer…………………………………………………………………………………..….1 Plans and Specifications……………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Estimate of Costs………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….8 District Diagram…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..11 Method of Apportionment………………………………………………………………………………………………….12 Appendix A – 2024-25 Financial Summary ………………………………………………………………………….16 Appendix B – Assessment Roll ………………………………………………………………………………………..….17 Appendix C – District Diagram …………………………………………………………………………………………...23 Appendix D – Capital Replacement …………………………………………………………………………………….27 Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
1 STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
Statement of Assessment Engineer
AGENCY: CITY OF GONZALES
PROJECT: CALIFORNIA BREEZE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
TO: THE CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF GONZALES

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
The preparation of this Annual Engineer’s Report (“Report”) is in conformance with the obligation of the City Council for the California Breeze Benefit Assessment District of the City of Gonzales to provide drainage services upon each lot or parcel of land in the district in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel of land for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, Chapter 6.4 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code (the “1982 Act”), Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the State of California Constitution, and in accordance with the City of Gonzales’ Resolution adopted by the City Council, this Report has been ordered for:

CANYON CREEK BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
(Hereinafter referred to as the “District”),
I, Alison Bouley, authorized representative of the District, the duly appointed Assessment Engineer submit the following Report which consists of the following four (4) parts and Appendices:

PART I
Description of Improvements: This part provides a general description of improvements proposed to be maintained in the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are on file with the City.

PART II
Estimate of Cost: This part contains the cost estimate of the proposed maintenance including incidental costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

2 PART III
District Diagram: This part incorporates a Diagram of the District showing the external boundaries of the District. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Monterey County Assessor for the year in which this Report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. The District Diagram is filed under separate cover with the City Clerk.

PART IV
Method of Apportionment of the Assessments: This part describes the method of apportionment of assessments, based upon parcel classification of land within the District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received. The costs and expenses of the District have been assessed upon the parcels of land within the boundaries of District pursuant to the initial methodology established by Resolution No. 2000-71 approved on the 24th day of July, 2000. For particulars as to the identification of parcels, reference is made to the District Diagram.

Appendices
Appendix A – Financial Summary
Appendix B – Assessment Roll
Appendix C – District Diagram
Appendix D – Capital Replacement
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed to the lots and parcels within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the services provided.

DATED this day of July, 2025
___________________________________________
Alison Bouley, P.E., Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. No. C61383
Engineer of Work
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
3 PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

INTRODUCTION
City Staff has contracted with Harris & Associates (“Harris”) to complete the annual administration process for all of City’s assessment districts. In addition to this required annual process, Harris has conducted an assessment district fund balance and capital asset replacement cash flow analysis to confirm and ensure that the City’s assessment districts annually assess property owners only for the essential funding to complete ongoing maintenance activities and finance timely capital replacement as assets reach the end of their useable lifecycles.

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICTS
CANYON CREEK BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1
Benefit Assessment District No. 1 (hereinafter “BAD 1”) is generally described as a district bounded on the northeast by Fanoe Road, on the southwest by State Route 101, on the southeast by the Sunrise Ranch Subdivision and on the northwest by Canyon Creek Phase II Subdivision.

CANYON CREEK BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2
Benefit Assessment District No. 2 (hereinafter “BAD 2”) is generally described as a district bounded on the northeast by Fanoe Road, on the southwest by Canyon Creek Phase I Subdivision and Canyon Creek Phase III Subdivision, on the southeast by Canyon Creek Phase I and on the northwest by Canyon Creek Phase III Subdivision.

CANYON CREEK BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 3
Benefit Assessment District No. 3 (hereinafter “BAD 3”) is generally described as a district bounded on the east by Herold Parkway, on the west by State Route 101, on the north by a line approximately 4,300 feet south of Fifth Street and on the south by a line approximately 5,100 feet south of Fifth Street.

COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
Assessments are levied annually pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, Chapter 6.4 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code (“1982 Act”). All assessments described in this Report and approved by the City Council are prepared in accordance with the 1982 Act. Any future increase in excess of the approved maximum assessments each year for the Canyon Creek BAD will require the approval of a majority of the property owners in accordance with the requirements of Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California (“Article XIIID”) and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act.

Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

4 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AND EXPENDITURES
Approval of the proposed assessment covered by this Engineer’s Report will generate the revenue necessary to:

Provide for the continued maintenance and future rehabilitation of the items listed below. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of the specified improvements. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District.

Canyon Creek BAD Phase 1
Maintenance and operation of the following described improvements of a local nature on public lands within said district including sweeping, street lights and lighting costs, storm drain lines, including necessary cleaning, repairs, replacement, electric current, supervision, debris removal, engineering and inspection and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for the proper maintenance and operation thereof. All additions, improvements and enlargements thereto which may hereafter be made on the following described work within the following streets and appurtenant improvement plans:

Fanoe Road, Burgundy Way, Champagne Way and Rhone Way: All as said streets are shown on that certain map titled “Benefit Assessment District No. 1, Canyon Creek Phase 1, Exhibit B” on file with the City Clerk.

Maintenance and operation of the following described improvements of a local nature on public lands within said district including storm water retention pond silt removal and bank stabilization and percolation, including necessary cleaning, repairs, replacement, electric current, supervision, debris removal, pest abatement, engineering and inspection and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for the proper maintenance and operation thereof. All additions, improvements and enlargements thereto which may hereafter be made on the following described work within the following area and appurtenant improvement plans:

Storm Water Retention Pond: Improvements as shown on the approved improvement plans titled “Canyon Creek Phase I” and any subsequent revisions and as on the approved Canyon Creek Tentative Map.

Maintenance and operation of the following described improvements of a local nature on public lands within said district including storm drain outfalls, Gonzales Slough silt removal and bank stabilization and percolation, including necessary cleaning, repairs, replacement, electric current, supervision, debris removal, pest abatement, engineering and inspection and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for the proper maintenance and operation thereof. All additions, improvements and enlargements thereto which may hereafter be made on the following described work within the following area and appurtenant improvement plans:

Gonzales Slough: Drainage improvements as shown on the approved improvement plans titled “Canyon Creek Phase I” and as shown on the approved Canyon Creek Tentative Map.

Incidental costs including contingencies, and assessment district incidentals including engineering, printing, and notices to property owners, collection costs, legal fees, administration and supervision, are assessed to the District on the same basis as the improvements specified above.

Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
5 Canyon Creek BAD Phase 2
Maintenance and operation of the following described improvements of a local nature on public lands within said district including sweeping, street lights and lighting costs, storm drain lines, including necessary cleaning, repairs, replacement, electric current, supervision, debris removal and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for the proper maintenance and operation thereof. All additions, improvements and enlargements thereto which may hereafter be made on the following described work within the following streets and appurtenant improvement plans:

Fanoe Road, Chianti Way, Chianti Court, Rhone Lane, Spumante Way, Champagne Way, and Rhone Way: All as said streets are shown on that certain map titled “Benefit Assessment District No. 2, Canyon Creek Phase II, Exhibit B” on file with the City Clerk.

Maintenance and operation of the following described improvements of a local nature on public lands within said district including storm water retention pond silt removal and bank stabilization and percolation, including necessary cleaning, repairs, replacement, electric current, supervision, debris removal, pest abatement, engineering and inspection and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for proper maintenance and operation thereof. All additions, improvements and enlargements thereto which may hereafter be made on the following described work within the following area and appurtenant improvement plans:

Storm Water Retention Pond: Improvements as shown on the approved improvement plans titled “Canyon Creek Phase I” and any subsequent revisions and as on the approved Canyon Creek Tentative Map.

Maintenance and operation of the following described improvements of a local nature on public lands within said district including storm drain outfalls, Gonzales Slough silt removal and bank stabilization and percolation, including necessary cleaning, repairs, replacement, electric current, supervision, debris removal, pest abatement, engineering and inspection and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for proper maintenance and operation thereof. All additions, improvements and enlargements thereto which may hereafter be made on the following described work within the following area and appurtenant improvement plans:

Gonzales Slough: Drainage improvements as shown on the approved improvement plans titled “Canyon Creek Phase I” and as shown on the approved Canyon Creek Tentative Map.

Incidental costs including contingencies, and assessment district incidentals including engineering, printing, and notices to property owners, collection costs, legal fees, administration and supervision, are assessed to the District on the same basis as the improvements specified above.

Canyon Creek BAD Phase 3
Maintenance and operation of the following described improvements of a local nature on public lands within said district including sweeping, streetlights and lighting costs, storm drain lines, including necessary cleaning, repairs, replacement, electric current, supervision, debris removal and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for the proper maintenance and operation thereof. All additions, improvements and enlargements thereto which may hereafter be made on the following described work within the following streets and appurtenant improvement plans:

Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

6 Burgundy Circle, Burgundy Way, Chianti Way, Spumante Way, Chablis Way, and Rhone Way: All as said streets are shown on that certain map titled “Benefit Assessment District No. 3, Canyon Creek Phase III, Exhibit B” on file with the City Clerk.

Maintenance and operation of the following described improvements of a local nature on public lands within said district including storm water retention pond silt removal and bank stabilization and percolation, including necessary cleaning, repairs, replacement, electric current, supervision, debris removal, pest abatement, engineering and inspection and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for proper maintenance and operation thereof. All additions, improvements and enlargements thereto which may hereafter be made on the following described work within the following area and appurtenant improvement plans:

Storm Water Retention Pond: Improvements as shown on the approved improvement plans titled “Canyon Creek Phase I” and any subsequent revisions and as on the approved Canyon Creek Tentative Map.

Maintenance and operation of the following described improvements of a local nature on public lands within said district including storm drain outfalls, Gonzales Slough silt removal and bank stabilization and percolation, including necessary cleaning, repairs, replacement, electric current, supervision, debris removal, pest abatement, engineering and inspection and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for proper maintenance and operation thereof. All additions, improvements and enlargements thereto which may hereafter be made on the following described work within the following area and appurtenant improvement plans:

Gonzales Slough: Drainage improvements as shown on the approved improvement plans titled “Canyon Creek Phase I” and as shown on the approved Canyon Creek Tentative Map.

Incidental costs including contingencies, and assessment district incidentals including engineering, printing, and notices to property owners, collection costs, legal fees, administration and supervision, are assessed to the District on the same basis as the improvements specified above.

Pursuant to the 1982 Act:
"Maintain" or "maintenance" means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement.
"Service" or "servicing" means the furnishing of electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other improvements.

Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
7 PART II – ESTIMATE OF COSTS
Estimate of Costs
All improvements within the Districts are maintained and serviced on a regular basis. Based upon the available revenues generated by the assessment, City staff determines the frequency and specific maintenance operations which can be provided in a given year.

The proposed budget is shown on the following page. This includes an estimate of the costs of utilities, operations, services, administration and maintenance associated with the improvements within the Districts, including all labor, personnel, equipment, materials and administrative expenses. The budget summary also shows the estimated fund balance and the projected fund reserves that will be available and may be required based upon the estimated expenditures and assessment revenue.

Beginning in Fiscal Year 2021-22, the City combined the budget page to show only the total expenditures, revenues, etc. for the District, rather than showing the expenditures and revenues by individual phases of the development, as had been done in previous years.

Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

8 Annual Budget

EXPENDITURES
Maintenance and Servicing
Gonzales Slough
Rodent Abatement $599
Mosquito Abatement $241
Bank Vegetation Restoration $1,200
Weed Abatement $1,200
Slope maintenance $2,414
Contractual Services $45,000
Street Sweeping 1
$0
Maintenance and Servicing Subtotal $50,654
Utilities $6,923
Capital Replacement/Repair Collection 2
Gonzales Slough Silt Removal $15,000
Percolation Pond Maintenance 3 $5,964
Percolation Pond Dredging 3
$5,964
Silt Removal $15,000
Street Repair $15,000
Street Lighting Reserve $6,000
Storm Drain Repair $5,232
Fanoe Channel Repair $2,097
Street Resurfacing and Street Sign Replacement 4
$22,500
Capital Replacement/Repair Subtotal $92,757
Capital Outlay (Slurry seal) $180,000
District Administration
City Staff (YE Transfers GF) $22,500
City Administration $3,500
City Labor and Overhead 5
$9,300
Engineering (Surveys & Assessment) $754
Supplies, Printing & Advertising Notices $398
Legal Counsel $1,500
Legal and Accounting Services $0
County Collection Fee $382
Contingency $7,517
District Administration Subtotal $45,851
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $376,185

REVENUES & ADJUSTMENTS
Actual/Estimated Assessments $152,880
Actual/Estimated Use of Money and Property $50,682
Transfer (To)/From Fund Balance $172,623
TOTAL REVENUES & ADJUSTMENTS $376,185
OPERATING RESERVE FUND BALANCE 6
Estimated Balance 7/1/2024 $188,093
Estimated Addition/(Reduction) $0
Estimated Interest Income $7,524
Estimated Balance 6/30/2025 $195,616

CAPITAL RESERVE FUND BALANCE
Estimated Balance 7/1/2024 $1,078,958
Estimated Addition/(Reduction) ($172,623)
Estimated Interest Income $43,158
Estimated Balance 6/30/2025 $949,494

ANNUAL LEVY SUMMARY
Total SFR Parcels Levied 226
Total SFR EDUs 226.00
Maximum Assessment per EDU Varies*
Assessment per EDU $600.00
Assessment Needed to Fully Fund Varies*
Total MDR Parcels Levied 1
Total MDR Dwelling Units Levied 36
Total MDR EDUs 28.80
Maximum Assessment per EDU $749.25
Assessment per EDU $600.00
Assessment Needed to Fully Fund $608.42
Definitions: SFR = Single Family Residential Parcel(s); MDR = Medium Density Residential Units; EDU= Equivalent Dwelling Unit * Refer to Budget Footnotes for Assessment Rates for each phase Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
9 A slurry seal project is scheduled for the District during the 2025 calendar year, using $180,000 from the Capital Reserve fund.

Budget Footnotes
1 2
Benefit Assessment District (BAD 1 , 2 & 3) Collection Yrs 2000 Cost 2016 Cost Annual Cost Gonzales Slough Silt Removal 10 $154,000 $241,732 $24,173 Percolation Pond Maintenance 10 $38,000 $59,648 $5,965
Percolation Pond Dredging 1 $3,800 $5,965 $5,965
Silt Removal 1 $15,400 $24,173 $24,173
Street Lighting Reserve 1 $3,000 $4,709 $4,709
Storm Drain Repair 3 $10,000 $15,697 $5,232
3 Phases I & II utilize one percolation pond. Phase III utilizes a separate retention pond. 4 See Appendix D for detailed cost breakdown for these items. 5 Items included in this category include salaries, overtime, Workers's Comp, Retirement & Insurance (Life, Health & FICA). 6 The Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District has 3 separate phases. The assessment amounts for each are as follows:

Phase 1 SFR parcels Maximum Assessment $867.73 . Actual Assessment $600.00. Assessment needed to fully fund $832.42 Phase 2 SFR parcels Maximum Assessment $1,041.80 . Actual Assessment $600.00. Assessment needed to fully fund $858.48 Phase 3 SFR parcels Maximum Assessment $749.25 . Actual Assessment $600.00. Assessment needed to fully fund $608.42 Beginning in Fiscal Year 2017/18, a Capital Reserve Fund was established for the District. The amounts collected for the current year, if any, are shown in the Budget table. The Beginning Balance for the Capital Reserve Fund is transferred from the Operating Reserve Fund. The amounts in the Operating Reserve Fund should be sufficient to pay for the operations and maintenance costs for the first six months of the fiscal year, approximately 50% of the total Reserve Balance. Any additional funds over and above the 50% to the Operating Reserve are shown in the Capital Reserve Fun balance. Any addition to or (reduction from) the Capital Reserve Fund will be shown and calculated annually in the same manner as the Operating Reserve Fund. Also, any funds collected for Capital Reserve and not spent, will be included in the ending Capital Reserve fund balance the following year.

Regularly scheduled street sweeping services are performed by Franchise Waste Hauler. Any services above and beyond said regularly scheduled maintenance will be billed to and paid for by the District.

For Capital Replacement Reserve items shown above, some of the costs are from the original Engineer's Report for the districts prepared in 1995. The costs for these items are shown below in 1995 dollars and escalated to year-end 2016 dollars by the increase in ENR-CCI for San Francisco for the same period. Details regarding capital replacement costs for the other items shown above are provided in Appendix D.

Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

10 PART III – DISTRICT DIAGRAM
District Diagram
The boundaries of the Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District are shown on the map in Appendix C. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions as shown on the maps of the Monterey County Assessor for the year in which this Report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. The District Diagram is also filed under separate cover with the City Clerk.

Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
11 PART IV – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
Method of Apportionment
GENERAL PROVISIONS – SPECIAL BENEFIT
Pursuant to the 1982 Act and Article XIIID, all parcels that receive a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5, of the Government Code, the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, permits the establishment of assessment districts by Cities for the purpose of providing certain public improvements that include street maintenance.

Section 54711 of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states:
(a) No benefit assessment shall be levied pursuant to this chapter unless it meets all of the following requirements:
(1) The amount of the assessment imposed on any parcel of property shall be related to the benefit to the parcel which will be derived from the provision of the service. Except as provided in subdivision (d) or (e) of Section 54715, in the case of a benefit assessment for flood control services, the benefit must be determined on the basis of the proportionate storm water runoff from each parcel. In the case of an assessment for the maintenance of streets, roads, or highways, the benefit shall be in proportion to the estimated traffic volume to be generated by each parcel assessed, or by any other reasonable basis as determined by the legislative body. (2) The annual aggregate amount of the assessment shall not exceed the estimated annual cost of providing the service.
(3) The revenue derived from the assessment shall not be used to pay the cost of any service other than the service for which the assessment was levied.

The 1982 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district.

Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways.

The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. The costs for the operation, maintenance and servicing of the improvements maintained for each zone are apportioned in accordance with the methodology which was established by the City Council upon formation of the Districts.

Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

12 GENERAL PROVISIONS – GENERAL BENEFIT
Although the improvements may include public streets and drainage facilities that connect to similar facilities outside the Districts’ boundaries, the construction, maintenance and operation of these improvements are only necessary for the development of properties within the Districts. As such, these improvements were not required nor necessarily desired by any properties or developments outside the Districts’ boundaries and any public access or use of the improvements by others is incidental. Therefore, it has been determined that the ongoing maintenance, servicing and operation of the District’s improvements provide no measurable general benefit to properties outside the Districts or to the public at large, but clearly provide distinct and special benefits to properties within the Districts.

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
Method of Assessment – BAD Phase 1
One hundred percent (100%) of all costs associated with the maintenance and operation of the BAD 1 improvements including incidentals and appurtenances is of special benefit to parcels within the district and shall be spread to all developed parcels within the District on a pro-rata development unit basis. Developed parcels are those parcels on which final map has been filed. Said parcels are also abutting or obtaining primary access from a public street.

Undeveloped parcels without an approved tentative Map shall be assessed for zero (0) the total of potential development units.

Factored development unit calculations for residential areas are as follows: Low Density residential = 1.0 Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU)
Monterey County charges 0.25% of the levy amount for collection for administration of the District.

Proposed and existing community or neighborhood park lands are of special benefit to parcels within Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3, and are not assessed (Parcels B and C), as shown on the assessment diagram. The detention pond, Parcel B, which is for the exclusive use of this development, is not assessed.

The assessment costs for the operation; maintenance and servicing of the improvements are apportioned in accordance with the methodology which was established by the City Council upon formation of the District. It was determined at that time that the most equitable method for spreading the estimated benefit received by each parcel in BAD 1 should be based on the EDU method. One parcel within the boundaries of BAD 1 is designated under a commercial land use. While the residential parcels will be assessed on the basis of one EDU per parcel, the commercial parcel will be assessed four (4) EDU per acre. The formula is as follows:

LAND USE PARCELS

DWELLING
UNITS
EDU
FACTOR
TOTAL

EDU RATE/EDU TOTAL ASMT
SFR 75 75 1.00 75.00 $600.00 $45,000.00
BAD 1 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT CALCULATION
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

13 Method of Assessment – BAD Phase 2
All costs associates with the maintenance and operation of BAD 2 improvements including Engineer’s Report, printing and advertising of assessment notices, County collection fees and legal fees all of which shall be spread to all parcels on a pro-rata development unit basis.

One hundred percent (100%) of all costs associates with the maintenance and operation of the BAD 2 improvements including incidentals and appurtenances is of special benefit to parcels within the District and shall be spread to all developed parcels within the District on a pro-rata development unit basis. Developed parcels are those parcels on which final map has been filed. Said parcels are also abutting or obtaining primary access from a public street.

Unit calculations for residential areas are as follows: Low Density Residential = 1.0 Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU).

The assessment costs for the operation, maintenance, and servicing of the improvements are apportioned in accordance with the methodology which was established by the City Council upon formation of the District. It was determined at that time that the most equitable method for spreading the estimated benefit received by each parcel in BAD 2 should be based on the EDU method. The formula is as follows:

Method of Assessment – BAD Phase 3
All costs associates with the maintenance and operation of BAD 3 improvements, including Engineer’s Report, printing and advertising of assessment notices, County collection fees and legal fees, all of which shall be spread to all parcels on a pro-rata development unit basis.

One hundred percent (100%) of all costs associates with the maintenance and operation of the BAD 3 improvements, including incidentals and appurtenances is of special benefit to properties within the District and shall be spread to all developed parcels within the District on a pro-rata development unit basis. The neighborhood park was constructed by this development for the benefit of this development. Developed Parcels are those parcels on which a final map has been filed. Said parcels are also abutting or obtaining primary access from a public street.

Factored development unit calculations for residential areas are as follows: Low Density residential = 1.0 Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU).

Parcels owned by the City of Gonzales are not assessed, which include Parcel “A”, right-of-way reservation, right-of-way for a future grade separation structure, and Parcel “B”, the retention pond site, which was constructed to serve this development.

The assessment costs for the operation, maintenance, and servicing of the improvements are apportioned in accordance with the methodology which was established by the City Council upon formation of the District. It was determined at that time that the most equitable method for spreading the estimated benefit received by each parcel in BAD 3 should be based on the EDU method. The formula is as follows:

LAND USE PARCELS

DWELLING
UNITS
EDU
FACTOR
TOTAL

EDU RATE/EDU TOTAL ASMT
SFR 74 74 1.00 74.00 $600.00 $44,400.00
BAD 2 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT CALCULATION
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

14 Assessments may be adjusted annually based on the April Consumer Price Index of the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Area All Urban Consumers Index (CPI-U). Adjustments are based on the change of the Consumer Price Index prior year/month as compared to the year/month assessments are determined (benchmark month for this district is April). The following table shows the prior year actual and maximum assessment rate per EDU, the annual CPI-U adjustment for the current fiscal year, the current year calculated maximum assessment, the assessment unit of measure, and the current year applied assessment rate.

LAND USE PARCELS

DWELLING
UNITS
EDU
FACTOR
TOTAL

EDU RATE/EDU TOTAL ASMT
SFR 77 77 1.00 77.00 $600.00 $46,200.00
MDR 1 36 0.80 28.80 $600.00 $17,280.00
TOTAL 78 113 105.80 $63,480.00
BAD 3 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT CALCULATION
District/Phase
Prior Year
Applied Assessment
Rate
Prior Year
Maximum
Assessment Rate
April to April %
adjustment in the
SF/Oak/Hay CPI-U
Current Year
Maximum
Assessment Rate
Current Year
Applied Assessment
Rate
Can Crk BAD 1 $600.00 $856.85 1.270% $867.73 $600.00
Can Crk BAD 2 $600.00 $1,028.74 1.270% $1,041.80 $600.00 Can Crk BAD 3 $600.00 $739.86 1.270% $749.25 $600.00
LMD 3 - MDR $600.00 $739.86 1.270% $749.25 $600.00
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
15 APPENDIX A – FINANCIAL SUMMARY
2024-25 Financial Summary
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
16 APPENDIX B – ASSESSMENT ROLL
Assessment Roll
The proposed assessment and the amount of the assessment apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the latest roll at the Assessor’s Office, is shown in Appendix A. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the Assessor of the County of Monterey and those records are, by reference, made part of this report. The assessments shown will be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller and included on the property tax bill for each parcel shown in the assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

17 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County
Collection Fee Total Assessment
020-321-001-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-002-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-003-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-004-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-005-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-006-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-007-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-008-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-009-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-010-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-011-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-012-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-013-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-014-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-015-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-016-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-017-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-018-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-019-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-020-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-021-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-022-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-023-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-024-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-025-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-026-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-322-001-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-322-002-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-322-003-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-322-004-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-322-005-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-001-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-002-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-003-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-004-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

18 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County
Collection Fee Total Assessment
020-323-005-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-006-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-007-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-008-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-009-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-010-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-011-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-012-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-013-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-014-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-015-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-016-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-017-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-018-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-019-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-020-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-021-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-022-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-023-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-024-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-025-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-026-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-027-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-028-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-029-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-030-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-031-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-001-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-002-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-003-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-004-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-005-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-006-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-007-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-008-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-009-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-010-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-011-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-012-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-013-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
TOTALS 75.00 $45,000.00
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

19 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County
Collection Fee Total Assessment
020-331-001-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-002-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-003-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-004-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-005-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-006-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-007-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-008-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-009-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-010-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-011-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-012-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-013-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-014-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-015-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-001-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-002-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-003-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-004-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-005-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-006-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-007-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-008-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-009-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-010-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-011-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-012-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-013-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-014-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-015-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-016-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-001-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-002-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-003-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-004-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-005-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-006-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-007-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-008-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-009-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-010-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-011-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
20 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County
Collection Fee Total Assessment
020-334-001-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-002-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-003-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-004-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-005-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-006-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-007-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-008-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-009-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-010-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-011-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-012-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-013-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-014-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-015-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-016-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-017-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-001-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-002-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-003-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-004-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-005-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-006-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-007-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-008-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-009-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-010-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-011-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-012-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-013-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-014-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-015-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
TOTALS 74.00 $44,400.00
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

21 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County
Collection Fee Total Assessment
020-333-012-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-013-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-014-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-015-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-016-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-017-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-018-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-019-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-020-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-018-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-019-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-020-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-021-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-016-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-017-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-018-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-019-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-020-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-021-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-022-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-023-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-024-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-025-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-026-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-027-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-028-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-029-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-030-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-031-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-032-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-033-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-034-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-035-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-036-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-037-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-336-001-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-336-002-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-336-003-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-336-004-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-341-001-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-341-002-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-001-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
22 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County
Collection Fee Total Assessment
020-342-002-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-003-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-004-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-005-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-006-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-007-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-008-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-009-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-010-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-011-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-012-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-013-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-014-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-015-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-018-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-019-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-020-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-021-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-022-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-023-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-024-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-025-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-026-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-027-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-028-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-029-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-030-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-031-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-032-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-033-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-034-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-035-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-342-036-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-343-005-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-343-006-000 III 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-343-007-000 III 28.80 $17,236.80 $43.20 $17,280.00
TOTALS 105.80 $63,480.00
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 23 APPENDIX C – DISTRICT DIAGRAMS District Diagrams
Diagrams for the District, including each Phase of the Canyon Creek Development, are shown on the following pages.

Packet Pg. 169
Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 24 Packet Pg. 170
Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 25 Packet Pg. 171
Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 26 Packet Pg. 172
Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 27 APPENDIX D – CAPITAL REPLACEMENT Capital Replacement The following pages show a summary of the Capital Replacement costs for each District within the City, as well as the Capital Replacement detail of each identified item for this District.

Packet Pg. 173
Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 28 Packet Pg. 174
Attachment: Canyon Creek Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3277 : Resolution No. 2025-35 Canyon Creek RESOLUTION NO. 2025-36

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GONZALES PROVIDING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF ENGINEER’S REPORT,

STATING INTENTION TO CONFIRM DIAGRAM AND TO LEVY AND

COLLECT ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS PURSUANT TO THE
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972

CANYON CREEK PARKS AND OPEN SPACES
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2 AND 3
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the Gonzales City Council (the “Council”) to confirm the diagram for and to levy and collect assessments in the Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District No.1, the Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District No. 2, and the Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District No. 3 for the purpose of maintaining, operating and/or servicing of public lands and improvements for parks and open space purposes pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the “Act”), being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (commencing with Section 22500) and as provided by Article XIIID of the California Constitution; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, Harris & Associates, the designated Engineer of Work of the City of Gonzales (the “City”) has filed with the City Clerk an Engineer’s Report (the “Report”) for the Districts called for under said Act; and WHEREAS, the Council has given consideration to the Report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said Report is sufficient, and that neither said Report, nor any parts thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Gonzales as follows:

1. With respect to the Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District No. 1, Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District No. 2, and Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District No. 3 Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, the Council finds:
• That the plans and specifications in said Report be, and they are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed.
• That the Engineer’s itemized and total costs and expenses of said maintenance, operation and/or servicing of public lands and improvements and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said Report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed.

Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-36 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Diagrams) AGENDA
ITEM
16 • That the diagrams showing each assessment district and the boundaries and dimensions of the respective subdivisions of land within each assessment district be, and are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. • That the proposed assessments upon the several subdivisions of land in said assessment districts in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such subdivisions, respectively, from said maintenance, operation and/or servicing of public lands and improvements, and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said Report, be, and they are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed.
• That the maps and descriptions of the lands and easements to be acquired, if any, contained in said Report be, and the same are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed.
• That the proposed maximum annual assessments upon each of the several subdivisions of land in the assessment districts to pay costs incurred by the City and not otherwise reimbursed which result from the administration and collection of assessments, as contained in said Report be, and the same are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed.
• That said Report is preliminarily approved and confirmed as a whole and shall stand as the Engineer’s Report for the purpose of all subsequent proceedings.

2. The Council hereby finds that the public interest and convenience requires, and as such declares its intention to levy and collect assessments against the assessable lots and parcel of land within the Districts referenced herein for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, all pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Article XIIID of the California Constitution.

3. The public improvements and lands to be maintained, operated and/or serviced are generally described in the Engineer’s Report for Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District No. 1 for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District No. 2 for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, and Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District No. 3 for Fiscal Year 2025- 2026, incorporated herein by reference.

4. The proposed assessment districts are generally described as follows:

Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District No. 1- a district bounded on the northeast by Fanoe Road, on the southwest by US Route 101, on the southeast by Sunrise Ranch Subdivision and on the northwest by the Canyon Creek Phase II subdivision.

Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District No. 2 - a district bounded by on the northeast by Fanoe Road, on the southwest by Canyon Creek Phase I Subdivision and Canyon Creek Phase III Subdivision, on the Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-36 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Diagrams) southeast by Canyon Creek Phase I and on the northwest by Canyon Creek Phase III Subdivision.

Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District No. 3 - a district bounded on the northeast by existing Canyon Creek Phases I & II, on the southwest by Canyon Creek Phase I Subdivision, on the southeast by Canyon Creek Phases I & II and on the northwest by Canyon Creek Phase I.

5. Reference to the Engineer’s Report, on file with the City Clerk, is hereby made for a full and detailed description of the public improvements, the boundaries of each assessment district, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within each assessment district.

6. It is ordered that Monday, July 21, 2025, at 6:00 p.m., in the regular meeting place of said Council, Council Chambers, 117 Fourth Street, Gonzales, California, is hereby appointed and fixed for the public hearing and time and place when and where the Council will consider and act upon the Engineer’s Report, confirm the District diagrams, and the levy of the proposed assessments.

7. The City Clerk is directed to give notice of the hearing by one publication of a copy of this Resolution in the local newspaper published and circulated in said City, pursuant to Section 6061 of the California Government Code.

8. The proposed assessments will not increase from the assessments established for the Districts in Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The District Maximum Assessment will be adjusted by the CPI, which has been set at 1.270%.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Gonzales duly held on the 2nd day of June, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Jose L. Rios, The Honorable Mayor
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-36 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Diagrams) ATTEST:

I, the undersigned Deputy City Clerk, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the City Council of the City of Gonzales, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2
nd day of June, 2025, by the above-stated vote of the members thereof, a majority being present.

Dated: June 2, 2025
Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-36 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Diagrams)

CITY OF GONZALES
PRELIMINARY ENGINEER’S REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

CANYON CREEK PARKS & OPEN SPACES
DISTRICT NO.’S 1, 2 & 3
FUND #302
July 2025

PREPARED BY
Harris & Associates
60 W. Alisal Street, Suite 200
Salinas, CA 93901
www.weareharris.com
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

CANYON CREEK PARKS AND OPEN SPACES
City of Gonzales
Monterey County
State of California

APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CANYON CREEK PARKS AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF GONZALES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON THE _____ DAY OF _________, 2025.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with me on the ________day of ______________, 2025.

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
City of Gonzales, Monterey County, CA
_________________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Gonzales, California on the ________day of ______________, 2025.

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
City of Gonzales, Monterey County, CA
__________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Monterey on the ________day of ______________, 2025.

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
City of Gonzales, Monterey County, CA
__________________________
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
Certifications…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………i Statement of Assessment Engineer…………………………………………………………………………………..…1 Plans and Specifications……………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Estimate of Costs………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 7 District Diagram………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 10 Method of Apportionment………………………………………………………………………………………………….11 Appendix A – 2024-25 Financial Summary ………………………………………………………………………… 14 Appendix B – Assessment Roll ………………………………………………………………………………………..… 15 Appendix C – District Diagram ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 21 Appendix D – Capital Replacement …………………………………………………………………………………… 25 Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
1 STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
Statement of Assessment Engineer
AGENCY: CITY OF GONZALES
PROJECT: Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces
TO: THE CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF GONZALES

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
The preparation of this Annual Engineer’s Report (“Report”) is in conformance with the obligation of the City Council for the Canyon Creek Parks and Open Space District of the City of Gonzales to provide drainage services upon each lot or parcel of land in the district in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel of land for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 22500) (the “Act”), Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the State of California Constitution, and in accordance with the City of Gonzales’ Resolution adopted by the City Council, this Report has been ordered for:

CANYON CREEK PARKS AND OPEN SPACES
(Hereinafter referred to as the “District”),
I, Alison Bouley, authorized representative of the District, the duly appointed Assessment Engineer submit the following Report which consists of the following four (4) parts and Appendices:

PART I
Description of Improvements: This part provides a general description of improvements proposed to be maintained in the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are on file with the City.

PART II
Estimate of Cost: This part contains the cost estimate of the proposed maintenance including incidental costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
2 PART III
District Diagram: This part incorporates a Diagram of the District showing the external boundaries of the District. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Monterey County Assessor for the year in which this Report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. The District Diagram is filed under separate cover with the City Clerk.

PART IV
Method of Apportionment of the Assessments: This part describes the method of apportionment of assessments, based upon parcel classification of land within the District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received. The costs and expenses of the District have been assessed upon the parcels of land within the boundaries of District pursuant to the initial methodology established by Resolution No. 2000-70 approved on the 24th day of July, 2000. For particulars as to the identification of parcels, reference is made to the District Diagram.

Appendices
Appendix A – Financial Summary
Appendix B – Assessment Roll
Appendix C – District Diagram
Appendix D – Capital Replacement
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed to the lots and parcels within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the services provided.

DATED this day of July, 2025.
___________________________________________
Alison Bouley, P.E., Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. No. C61383
Engineer of Work
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
3 PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Plans and Specifications

INTRODUCTION
City Staff has contracted with Harris & Associates (“Harris”) to complete the annual administration process for all of City’s assessment districts. In addition to this required annual process, Harris has conducted an assessment district fund balance and capital asset replacement cash flow analysis to confirm and ensure that the City’s assessment districts annually assess property owners only for the essential funding to complete ongoing maintenance activities and finance timely capital replacement as assets reach the end of their useable lifecycles.

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICTS
The Districts were formed in 2000 to provide a dedicated funding source for the maintenance and operation of any or all public landscaping and irrigation improvements, of a local nature, on landscaped strips of land adjacent to curbs of the following described streets, including jogging paths, planter walls, grass berms, appurtenant irrigation systems; ornamental plantings including lawns, shrubs, and trees; including necessary repairs, replacements, water, electric current, spraying, care, supervision, debris removal, and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for the proper maintenance and operation thereof and all additions, improvements and enlargements thereto CANYON CREEK PARK AND OPEN SPACES PHASE 1
Canyon Creek Park and Open Spaces District No. 1, Phase I (hereinafter “LMD 1”) is generally described as a district bounded on the northeast by Fanoe Road, on the southwest by State Route 101, on the southeast by the Sunrise Ranch Subdivision and on the northwest by the Canyon Creek Phase II subdivision.

CANYON CREEK PARK AND OPEN SPACES PHASE 2
Canyon Creek Park and Open Spaces District No. 2, Phase II (hereinafter “LMD 2”) is generally described as a district bounded on the northeast by Fanoe Road, on the southwest by Canyon Creek Phase I Subdivision and Canyon Creek Phase III Subdivision, on the southeast by Canyon Creek Phase I and on the northwest by Canyon Creek Phase III Subdivision.

CANYON CREEK PARK AND OPEN SPACES PHASE 3
Canyon Creek Park and Open Spaces District No. 3, Phase III (hereinafter “LMD 3”) is generally described as a district bounded on the northeast by existing Canyon Creek Phases I & II, on the southwest by Canyon Creek Phase I Subdivision, on the southeast by Canyon Creek Phases I & II and on the northwest by Canyon Creek Phase I.

Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

4 COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
Assessments are levied annually pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (“1972 Act”). All assessments described in this Report and approved by the City Council are prepared in accordance with the 1972 Act and are in compliance with the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIIID (“Article XIIID”), which was enacted with the passage of Proposition 218 (“Prop 218”) in November 1996.

SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AND EXPENDITURES
A summary of the assessments to be levied is shown in the table below.

LEVEL OF MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROVIDED
All costs associated with the maintenance and operation of the Districts’ improvements including Engineer’s Report, printing and advertising of assessment notices, County collection fees and legal fees all of which shall be spread to all parcels on a pro-rata development unit basis.

One hundred percent (100%) of all costs associated with the maintenance and operation of the Districts’ improvements including incidentals and appurtenances is of special benefit to parcels within the Districts and shall be spread to all parcels within the Districts on a development unit basis.

LANDUSE PARCELS

DWELLING
UNITS
EDU
FACTOR
TOTAL

EDU RATE/EDU TOTAL ASMT
Low Density Single
Family Residential 75 75 1.00 75.00 $600.00 $45,000.00

LANDUSE PARCELS

DWELLING
UNITS
EDU
FACTOR
TOTAL

EDU RATE/EDU TOTAL ASMT
Low Density Single
Family Residential 74 74 1.00 74.00 $600.00 $44,400.00

LANDUSE PARCELS

DWELLING
UNITS
EDU
FACTOR
TOTAL

EDU RATE/EDU TOTAL ASMT
Low Density Single
Family Residential 77 77 1.00 77.00 $486.00 $37,422.00
Medium Density
Residential 1 36 0.80 28.80 $486.00 $13,996.80
TOTAL 78 113 105.80 $51,418.80
LMD PHASE 3 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT CALCULATION
LMD PHASE 1 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT CALCULATION
LMD PHASE 2 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT CALCULATION
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
5 Pursuant to the 1972 Act:
"Maintain" or "maintenance" means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement.
"Service" or "servicing" means the furnishing of electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other improvements.

SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AND EXPENDITURES
CANYON CREEK LMD PHASES 1, 2 & 3
Maintenance and operation of any or all public landscaping and irrigation improvements, of a local nature, on landscaped strips of land adjacent to curbs of the following described streets, including jogging paths, planter walls, grass berms, appurtenant irrigation systems; ornamental plantings including lawns, shrubs, and trees; including necessary repairs, replacements, water, electric current, spraying, care, supervision, debris removal, and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for the proper maintenance and operation thereof and all additions, improvements and enlargements thereto which may hereafter be made on the following described work:

Fanoe Road Landscaping, located in a strip of land approximately 20 feet in width from face of southwest curb lines including planter walls from Sunrise Ranch northwesterly 1430 feet more or less and within the street frontage of Burgundy Way, and Rhone Lane and generally east of Rhone Way, and contiguous with the Fanoe Road landscaping.

Maintenance and operation of any or all public landscaping and irrigation improvements, of a local nature, on landscaped strips of land adjacent to curbs of the following described areas, including retention pond landscaping and bank protection, appurtenant irrigation systems; ornamental plantings including lawns, shrubs, and trees; including necessary repairs, replacements, water, electric current, spraying, care, supervision, debris removal, and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for the proper maintenance and operation thereof and all additions, improvements and enlargements thereto which may hereafter be made on the following described work:

Storm Water Retention Pond and appurtenant access and irrigation as said parcel as shown on the approved improvement plans titled “Canyon Creek Phase I” and the approved tentative map.

Maintenance and operation of planter walls and associated improvements, of a local nature, including necessary repairs, replacements, spraying, care, supervision, debris removal, and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for the proper maintenance and operation thereof and all additions, improvements and enlargements thereto which may hereafter be made on the following described work:

State Route 101, a strip of land 5 feet wide along the northeasterly boundary of the sound wall easement adjacent to Route 101 including appurtenant sound wall.

Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

6 Maintenance and operation of any or all public landscaping and irrigation improvements, of a local nature, on landscaped land adjacent including jogging paths, planter walls, grass berms, appurtenant irrigation systems; ornamental plantings including lawns, shrubs, and trees; park access bridge and bridge utility repair and replacement, park and bridge liability insurance coverage, including necessary repairs, replacements, water, electric current, spraying, care, supervision, debris removal, and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for the proper maintenance and operation thereof and all additions, improvements and enlargements thereto which may hereafter be made on the following described work:

Tot Lot, Located in Lot 225 (Tentative Map Designation), adjacent to the Retention Pond, and Public Park, Parcels A&B (Tentative Map Designation) as shown on the approved tentative map for Canyon Creek. The proposed Parcel B Public Park and appurtenant improvements (bridge, water, electrical, etc.) listed previously was deleted from description of work since it was not built, but has been added back into the district and the Public Park expanded to include Parcel A (Gonzales Slough) as well as Parcel B. The original budget originally established has therefore been reinstated for maintenance items to also cover a portion of the maintenance costs related to the park and appurtenant improvements.

Incidental costs including contingencies, and assessment district incidentals including engineering, printing, and notices to property owners, collection costs, legal fees, administration and supervision, are assessed to the District on the same basis as the improvements specified above.

Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
7 PART II – ESTIMATE OF COSTS
Estimate of Costs
All improvements within the Districts are maintained and serviced on a regular basis. Based upon the available revenues generated by the assessment, City staff determines the frequency and specific maintenance operations which can be provided in a given year.

The proposed budget is shown on the following page. This includes an estimate of the costs of utilities, operations, services, administration and maintenance associated with the improvements within the Districts, including all labor, personnel, equipment, materials and administrative expenses. The budget summary also shows the estimated fund balance and the projected fund reserves that will be available and may be required based upon the estimated expenditures and assessment revenue.

Beginning in Fiscal Year 2021-22, the City combined the budget page to show only the total expenditures, revenues, etc. for the District, rather than showing the expenditures and revenues by individual phases of the development, as had been done in previous years.

Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
8 Annual Budget

EXPENDITURES
Maintenance and Servicing
Tot Lot $14,119
Contractual Services - Park Maintenance $28,140
Other Contractual Services $0
Parkway & Percolation Pond Landscape Maintenance 1
$9,883
Sound Wall Maintenance $561
Maintenance and Servicing Subtotal $52,702
Utilities
Street Landscaping Water Charges $1,385
Tot Lot/Park Water Charges $11,940
Tot Lot/Park Electrical Charges $5,973
Utilities Subtotal $19,297
Capital Replacement/Repair Collection 2
Sound Wall Reserve 3
$15,000
Bridge/Utility Replacement Reserve $15,000
Capital Replacement/Repair Subtotal $30,000
Capital Outlay (Park Improvements) $450,000
District Administration
City Staff (YE Transfers GF) $3,600
City Administration $3,500
City Labor and Overhead 4
$30,000
Engineering (Surveys & Assessment) $754
Supplies, Printing & Advertising Notices $3,169
Legal Counsel $1,500
Legal and Accounting Services $0
County Collection Fee $352
Contingency $1,963
District Administration Subtotal $44,838
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $596,837

REVENUES & ADJUSTMENTS
Actual/Estimated Assessments $140,819
Actual/Estimated Use of Money and Property $38,287
Transfer (To)/From Fund Balance $417,731
TOTAL REVENUES & ADJUSTMENTS $596,837
OPERATING RESERVE FUND BALANCE 5
Estimated Balance 7/1/2025 $73,419
Estimated Addition/(Reduction) $0
Estimated Interest Income $2,937
Estimated Balance 6/30/2026 $76,355

CAPITAL RESERVE FUND BALANCE
Estimated Balance 7/1/2025 $883,761
Estimated Addition/(Reduction) ($417,731)
Estimated Interest Income $35,350
Estimated Balance 6/30/2026 $501,380

ANNUAL LEVY SUMMARY
Total SFR Parcels Levied 226
Total SFR EDUs 226.00
Maximum Assessment per EDU Varies*
Assessment per EDU Varies*
Assessment Needed to Fully Fund Varies*
Total MDR Parcels Levied 1
Total MDR Dwelling Units Levied 36
Total MDR EDUs 28.80
Maximum Assessment per EDU $583.01
Assessment per EDU $486.00
Assessment Needed to Fully Fund $646.13
Definitions: SFR = Single Family Residential Parcel(s); MDR = Medium Density Residential Units EDU= Equivalent Dwelling Unit
* Refer to Budget Footnotes for Assessment Rates for each phase Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

9 A park improvement project is scheduled for the District during the 2025 calendar year, using $450,000 from the Capital Reserve fund.

Budget Footnotes
1 Phases I & II utilize one percolation pond. Phase III utilizes a separate retention pond. 2 Park & Open Space Assessment District Collection Yrs 2004 Cost 2016 Cost Annual Cost Bridge/Utility Replacement 40 $200,000 $284,163 $7,104
3 The capital replacement reserve cost for sound walls is as follows:

Park & Open Space Assessment District Collection Yrs Square Feet Cost per SF Total Cost Annual Cost Sound Wall Surface 25 39,115 $5 $195,575 $7,823
4 Items included in this category include salaries, overtime, Workers's Comp, Retirement & Insurance (Life, Health & FICA). 5 The Canyon Creek Park and Landscape Maintenance District has 3 separate phases. The assessment amounts for each are as follows:

Phase 1 SFR parcels Maximum Assessment $970.76 . Actual Assessment $600.00. Assessment needed to Fully fund $737.35 Phase 2 SFR parcels Maximum Assessment $1,091.61 . Actual Assessment $600.00. Assessment needed to Fully fund $739.15 Phase 3 SFR parcels Maximum Assessment $583.01 . Actual Assessment $600.00. Assessment needed to Fully fund $646.13 Beginning in Fiscal Year 2017/18, a Capital Reserve Fund was established for the District. The amounts collected for the current year, if any, are shown in the Budget table. The Beginning Balance for the Capital Reserve Fund is transferred from the Operating Reserve Fund. The amounts in the Operating Reserve Fund should be sufficient to pay for the operations and maintenance costs for the first six months of the fiscal year, approximately 50% of the total Reserve Balance. Any additional funds over and above the 50% to the Operating Reserve are shown in the Capital Reserve Fun balance. Any addition to or (reduction from) the Capital Reserve Fund will be shown and calculated annually in the same manner as the Operating Reserve Fund. Also, any funds collected for Capital Reserve and not spent, will be included in the ending Capital Reserve fund balance the following year.

For capital replacement reserve items shown above, some of the costs are from the original Engineer's Report for the districts prepared in 2004 and increased to year end 2016 dollars by the increase in the ENR-CCI for San Francisco for the same period. Details regarding capital replacement costs for the other items shown above are provided in Appendix D.

Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

10 PART III – DISTRICT DIAGRAM
District Diagram
The boundaries of the Canyon Creek Parks and Open Space District are shown on the map in Appendix C. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions as shown on the maps of the Monterey County Assessor for the year in which this Report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. The District Diagram is also filed under separate cover with the City Clerk.

Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

11 PART IV – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
Method of Apportionment

GENERAL PROVISIONS
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements including the construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value:
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.” The formula used for calculating assessments in the Districts therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on estimated benefit to each parcel. In addition, pursuant to Prop 218:
“No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Only special benefits are assessable and an agency shall separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel.”

BENEFIT ANALYSIS
Each of the improvements have been carefully reviewed by the City and the corresponding assessments have been proportionately spread to each parcel based on improvements as determined at the time the Districts were established.

General Benefits
The improvements within these Districts are a direct result of property development within the Districts and would otherwise not be required or necessary. Developers typically install landscape improvements to enhance the marketability and value of properties within the development and/or as conditions of development. In either case, the improvements are clearly installed for the benefit of the properties developed and not for the benefit of surrounding properties.

Although many landscape improvements (by virtue of their location), may be visible to surrounding properties or to the public at large, any benefit to surrounding properties is incidental and cannot be considered a direct and special benefit to those properties. Therefore, it has been determined that the improvements within these Districts and the ongoing operation and maintenance of those improvements are clearly a direct and special benefit to properties within the Districts. Unless otherwise noted, these improvements provide no measurable general benefit to properties outside the Districts or to the public at large.

Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
12 Special Benefits
The method of apportionment (assessment methodology) approved at the time the Districts were formed is based on the premise that each of the assessed parcels within the Districts receives benefit from the improvements maintained and financed by annual assessments.

Specifically, the assessments are for the maintenance of local landscape improvements installed as part of the original improvement. The desirability and safety of properties within the Districts are enhanced by the presence of wellmaintained landscaping. The special benefits associated with the local landscaping improvements are specifically:
• Enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements. • Improved aesthetic appeal of properties within the District providing a positive representation of the area.
• Enhanced adaptation of the urban environment within the natural environment from adequate green space and landscaping.
• Increased sense of pride in ownership of property within the District resulting from wellmaintained improvements associated with the properties.

All of the preceding special benefits contribute to a specific enhancement and desirability of each of the assessed parcels within the District.

Non-Assessable Parcels
Within the boundaries of the District, there may be properties that are considered to receive no special benefit from the improvements and services provided and are therefore not assessed.

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The Districts are assessed, on the basis of total development units generated, for the maintenance and operation of the Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment Districts 1, 2 & 3 including incidentals and appurtenances and shall include all the costs of maintaining and/or operating the improvements described herein.

All costs associated with the maintenance and operation of the Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District No. 1 improvements including Engineer’s Report, printing and advertising of assessment notices and legal fees shall be spread to all parcels on a pro-rata development unit basis.

Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping, street lighting, and park and recreational facilities.

Section 22573 of the Lighting and Landscaping Act of 1972 requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. In addition, Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property.

Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
13 Article XIIID provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Excepted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-way, public greenbelts and public parkways, and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private commercial, industrial and institutional activities.

The majority of improvements being maintained and operated as a result of the formation District have been constructed. All of the improvements have been installed within or in areas in close proximity to the developed residential lots.

The residential lots within the Canyon Creek subdivision receive special benefits which include enhanced neighborhood identity and quality of life, generated when park landscaping and lighting are in place, improved, operable, safe, clean and maintained. In short, maintenance and operation of the proposed improvements will provide beautification, shade, and increase the desirability of the immediate surroundings of the residential units within the District.

Because of the location of the improvements, there is no general benefit to properties outside the District or the community as a whole, or a general benefit that is so negligible; it cannot be calculated for purposes of assessment.

As such, all costs associated with the maintenance and operation of the improvements, including incidentals and appurtenances, shall be spread to all parcels within the District on a per unit basis. Developed parcels are those parcels on which a final subdivision map has been filed. Said parcels also abut or obtain primary access from a public street.

In order to determine the appropriate assessment for each developed parcel, a budget for operation and maintenance costs associated with planned improvements in the entire Canyon Creek Subdivision Project was prepared. In some instances, the total cost of operation and maintenance of a given improvement must be collected on an annual basis.

Since the developed parcels in the District are the only parcels that derive special benefit from such activities, they must bear the entire cost of operation and maintenance.

Factored development unit calculations are as follows: Low Density Single Family Residential (SFR) = 1.0 Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU); Medium Density Residential (MDR) = 0.8 EDU Monterey County charges 0.25% of the levy amount for collection for administration of the District.

Assessments may be adjusted annually based on the April Consumer Price Index of the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Area All Urban Consumers Index (CPI-U). Adjustments are based on the change of the Consumer Price Index prior year/month as compared to the year/month assessments are determined (benchmark month for this district is April). The following table shows the prior year actual and maximum assessment rate per EDU, the annual CPI-U adjustment for the current fiscal year, the current year calculated maximum assessment, the assessment unit of measure, and the current year applied assessment rate.

District/Phase
Prior Year
Applied Assessment
Rate
Prior Year
Maximum
Assessment Rate
April to April %
adjustment in the
SF/Oak/Hay CPI-U
Current Year
Maximum
Assessment Rate
Current Year
Applied Assessment
Rate
Cny Crk LMD 1 $600.00 $945.26 1.270% $970.76 $600.00
Cny Crk LMD 2 $600.00 $1,062.94 1.270% $1,091.61 $600.00 Cny Crk LMD 3 $486.00 $567.70 1.270% $583.01 $486.00
LMD 3 - MDR $486.00 $567.70 1.270% $583.01 $486.00
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
14 APPENDIX A – FINANCIAL SUMMARY
2024-25 Financial Summary
Annual Budget

EXPENDITURES
Maintenance and Servicing
Tot Lot $14,119
Contractual Services - Park Maintenance $55,093
Other Contractual Services $0
Parkway & Percolation Pond Landscape Maintenance 1
$9,883
Sound Wall Maintenance $561
Maintenance and Servicing Subtotal $79,655
Utilities
Street Landscaping Water Charges $1,154
Tot Lot/Park Water Charges $9,950
Tot Lot/Park Electrical Charges $4,977
Utilities Subtotal $16,081
Capital Replacement/Repair Collection 2
Sound Wall Reserve 3
$15,000
Bridge/Utility Replacement Reserve $15,000
Capital Replacement/Repair Subtotal $30,000
Capital Outlay $0
District Administration
City Staff (YE Transfers GF) $4,787
City Administration $3,500
City Labor and Overhead 4
$9,887
Engineering (Surveys & Assessment) $704
Supplies, Printing & Advertising Notices $653
Legal Counsel $1,500
Legal and Accounting Services $0
County Collection Fee $352
Contingency $7,826
District Administration Subtotal $29,209
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $154,945

REVENUES & ADJUSTMENTS
Actual/Estimated Assessments $140,819
Actual/Estimated Use of Money and Property $1,317
Transfer (To)/From Fund Balance $12,809
TOTAL REVENUES & ADJUSTMENTS $154,945
OPERATING RESERVE FUND BALANCE 5
Estimated Balance 7/1/2024 $77,473
Estimated Addition/(Reduction) $0
Estimated Interest Income $3,099
Estimated Balance 6/30/2025 $80,572

CAPITAL RESERVE FUND BALANCE
Estimated Balance 7/1/2024 $762,358
Estimated Addition/(Reduction) ($12,809)
Estimated Interest Income $30,494
Estimated Balance 6/30/2025 $780,043

ANNUAL LEVY SUMMARY
Total SFR Parcels Levied 226
Total SFR EDUs 226.00
Maximum Assessment per EDU Varies*
Assessment per EDU Varies*
Assessment Needed to Fully Fund $608.11
Total MDR Parcels Levied 1
Total MDR Dwelling Units Levied 36
Total MDR EDUs 28.80
Maximum Assessment per EDU $583.01
Assessment per EDU $486.00
Assessment Needed to Fully Fund $666.33
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
15 APPENDIX B – ASSESSMENT ROLL
Assessment Roll
The proposed assessment and the amount of the assessment apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the latest roll at the Assessor’s Office, is shown in Appendix A. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the Assessor of the County of Monterey and those records are, by reference, made part of this report. The assessments shown will be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller and included on the property tax bill for each parcel shown in the assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
16 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County
Collection Fee Total Assessment
020-321-001-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-002-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-003-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-004-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-005-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-006-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-007-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-008-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-009-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-010-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-011-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-012-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-013-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-014-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-015-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-016-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-017-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-018-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-019-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-020-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-021-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-022-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-023-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-024-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-025-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-321-026-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-322-001-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-322-002-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-322-003-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-322-004-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-322-005-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-001-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-002-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-003-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-004-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

17 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County
Collection Fee Total Assessment
020-323-005-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-006-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-007-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-008-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-009-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-010-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-011-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-012-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-013-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-014-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-015-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-016-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-017-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-018-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-019-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-020-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-021-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-022-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-023-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-024-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-025-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-026-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-027-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-028-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-029-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-030-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-323-031-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-001-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-002-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-003-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-004-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-005-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-006-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-007-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-008-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-009-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-010-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-011-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-012-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-324-013-000 I 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
TOTALS 75.00 $45,000.00
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

18 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County
Collection Fee Total Assessment
020-331-001-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-002-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-003-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-004-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-005-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-006-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-007-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-008-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-009-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-010-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-011-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-012-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-013-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-014-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-331-015-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-001-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-002-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-003-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-004-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-005-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-006-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-007-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-008-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-009-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-010-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-011-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-012-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-013-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-014-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-015-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-332-016-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-001-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-002-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-003-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-004-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-005-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-006-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-007-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-008-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-009-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-010-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-333-011-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
19 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County
Collection Fee Total Assessment
020-334-001-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-002-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-003-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-004-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-005-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-006-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-007-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-008-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-009-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-010-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-011-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-012-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-013-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-014-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-015-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-016-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-334-017-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-001-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-002-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-003-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-004-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-005-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-006-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-007-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-008-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-009-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-010-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-011-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-012-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-013-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-014-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
020-335-015-000 II 1.00 $598.50 $1.50 $600.00
TOTALS 74.00 $44,400.00
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
20 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County
Collection Fee Total Assessment
020-333-012-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-333-013-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-333-014-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-333-015-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-333-016-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-333-017-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-333-018-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-333-019-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-333-020-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-334-018-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-334-019-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-334-020-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-334-021-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-335-016-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-335-017-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-335-018-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-335-019-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-335-020-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-335-021-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-335-022-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-335-023-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-335-024-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-335-025-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-335-026-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-335-027-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-335-028-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-335-029-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-335-030-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-335-031-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-335-032-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-335-033-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-335-034-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-335-035-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-335-036-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-335-037-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-336-001-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-336-002-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-336-003-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-336-004-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-341-001-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-341-002-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-001-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

21 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County
Collection Fee Total Assessment
020-342-002-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-003-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-004-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-005-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-006-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-007-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-008-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-009-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-010-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-011-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-012-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-013-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-014-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-015-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-018-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-019-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-020-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-021-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-022-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-023-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-024-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-025-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-026-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-027-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-028-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-029-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-030-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-031-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-032-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-033-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-034-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-035-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-342-036-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-343-005-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-343-006-000 III 1.00 $484.79 $1.21 $486.00
020-343-007-000 III 28.80 $13,961.81 $34.99 $13,996.80
TOTALS 105.80 $51,418.80
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 22 APPENDIX C – DISTRICT DIAGRAMS District Diagrams
Diagrams for the District, including each Phase of the Canyon Creek Development, are shown on the following pages.

Packet Pg. 203
Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 23 Packet Pg. 204
Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 24 Packet Pg. 205
Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 25 Packet Pg. 206
Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 26 APPENDIX D – CAPITAL REPLACEMENT Capital Replacement The following pages show a summary of the Capital Replacement costs for each District within the City, as well as the Capital Replacement detail of each identified item for this District.

Packet Pg. 207
Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Parks and Open Spaces City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 27 Packet Pg. 208
Attachment: Canyon Creek P&OS Report FY 25-26 (3278 : Resolution No. 2025-36 Canyon Creek P&OS RESOLUTION NO. 2025-37

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GONZALES

OF INTENTION TO CONFIRM DIAGRAM AND TO LEVY AND

COLLECT ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS PURSUANT TO THE
BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1982

GONZALES INDUSTRIAL PARK BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the Gonzales Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District was formed in 2003 to provide a dedicated funding source for the maintenance and operation of District improvements, and the boundaries of the District were adjusted in Fiscal Year 2018-2019 to include additional property annexed to the District; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the Gonzales City Council (the “Council”) to confirm the diagram for and to levy and collect assessments in the Gonzales Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District for the purpose of maintaining, operating and/or servicing of public lands and improvements pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 (the “Act”), being Title 5, Part 1, Division 2, Chapter 6.4 of the California Government Code (commencing with Section 54703) and as provided by Article XIIID of the California Constitution; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, Harris & Associates, the designated Engineer of Work of the City of Gonzales (the “City”) has filed with the City Clerk an Engineer’s Report (the “Report”) for the District called for under said Act; and WHEREAS, the Council has given preliminary consideration to the Report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said Report is sufficient, and that neither said Report, nor any part thereof requires or should be modified in any respect.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Gonzales as follows:

1. The Council hereby finds that the public interest and convenience requires, and as such declares its intention to levy and collect assessments against the assessable lots and parcels of land within the District referenced herein for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, all pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 and Article XIIID of the California Constitution.

2. The public improvements and lands to be maintained, operated and/or serviced are generally described in the Gonzales Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, incorporated herein by reference.

3. The proposed assessment district is generally described as follows:

Gonzales Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District- a district bounded on the northwest by Lands of Meyer, on the southeast by existing parcels fronting Gonzales River Road (Vol. 1, Page 163, Volume 19 of Surveys, Page 67, and Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-37 (3279 : Resolution No. 2025-37 Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Diagrams) AGENDA
ITEM
17 Volume 20 Cities and Towns, Page 13); on the southwest by Lands of Hibino (Reel 514, Page 1002); and on the Northeast by Lands of Meyer, City of Gonzales, and Silva Harvesting, Inc.; and property to the northeast of the abovedescribed boundaries consisting of 13.451 acres, including assessor’s parcels 020- 021-002, 020-021-007, and 202-021-008.

4. Reference to the Engineer’s Report, on file with the City Clerk, is hereby made for a full and detailed description of the public improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the assessment district.

5. It is ordered that Monday, July 21, 2025, at the hour of 6:00 p.m., in the regular meeting place of said Council, Council Chambers, City Hall, 117 Fourth Street, Gonzales, California, is hereby appointed and fixed for the public hearing and time and place when and where the Council will consider and act upon the Engineer’s Report, confirm the District diagram, and the levy of the proposed assessments, if any.

6. The City Clerk is directed to give notice of the hearing by one publication of a copy of this Resolution of Intention in the local newspaper published and circulated in said City, pursuant to Section 6061 of the California Government Code.

7. The proposed assessments will increase from the assessments established for the District in Fiscal Year 2024-2025, from $1,305 to $1,500 per acre. The District Maximum Assessment will be adjusted by the CPI, which has been set at 1.270%.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Gonzales duly held on the 2nd of June, 2025, by the following vote:

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Gonzales duly held on the 2nd day of June, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Jose L. Rios, The Honorable Mayor
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-37 (3279 : Resolution No. 2025-37 Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Diagrams) ATTEST:

I, the undersigned Deputy City Clerk, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the City Council of the City of Gonzales, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2
nd day of June, 2025, by the above-stated vote of the members thereof, a majority being present.

Dated: June 2, 2025
Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-37 (3279 : Resolution No. 2025-37 Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Diagrams)

CITY OF GONZALES
PRELIMINARY ENGINEER’S REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

INDUSTRIAL PARK

BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FUND #641
JULY 2025 PREPARED BY
Harris & Associates
60 W. Alisal Street, Suite 200 Salinas, CA 93901
www.weareharris.com
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Industrial Park Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3279 : Resolution No. 2025-37 Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

INDUSTRIAL PARK LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT City of Gonzales
Monterey County
State of California

APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE INDUSTRIAL PARK BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF GONZALES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON THE _____ DAY OF _________, 2025.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with me on the ________day of ______________, 2025.

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
City of Gonzales, Monterey County, CA
_________________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Gonzales, California on the ________day of ______________, 2025.

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
City of Gonzales, Monterey County, CA
__________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Monterey on the ________day of ______________, 2025.

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
City of Gonzales, Monterey County, CA
__________________________
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Industrial Park Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3279 : Resolution No. 2025-37 Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
Certifications…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………i Statement of Assessment Engineer…….……………………………………………………………………………..….1 Description of Improvements…………….………………………………………………………………………………….3 Estimate of Costs……………………………….………………………………………………………………………………….5 District Diagram……………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………...8 Method of Apportionment…………….……………………………………………………………………………………...9 Appendix A – 2024-25 Financial Summary.…………………………………………………………………………..12 Appendix B – Assessment Roll.………………………………………………………………………………………..…..13 Appendix C – District Diagrams…….……………………………………………………………………………………...14 Appendix D – Capital Replacement……………………………………………………………………………………...17 Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Industrial Park Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3279 : Resolution No. 2025-37 Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

1 STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
Statement of Assessment Engineer
AGENCY: CITY OF GONZALES
PROJECT: Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District
TO: THE CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF GONZALES

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
The preparation of this Annual Engineer’s Report (“Report”) is in conformance with the obligation of the City Council for the Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District of the City of Gonzales to provide drainage services upon each lot or parcel of land in the district in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel of land for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, Section 5 of the California Government Code (“1982 Act”), beginning with Section 54703, Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the State of California Constitution (collectively “Assessment Law”), and in accordance with the City of Gonzales’ Resolution adopted by the City Council, this Report has been ordered for:

INDUSTRIAL PARK BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
(Hereinafter referred to as the “District”),
I, Alison Bouley, authorized representative of the District, the duly appointed Assessment Engineer submit the following Report which consists of the following four (4) parts and Appendices:

PART I
Description of Improvements: This part provides a general description of improvements proposed to be maintained in the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are on file with the City.

PART II
Estimate of Cost: This part contains the cost estimate of the proposed maintenance including incidental costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Industrial Park Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3279 : Resolution No. 2025-37 Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

2 PART III
District Diagram: This part incorporates a diagram of the District showing the external boundaries of the District. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Monterey County Assessor for the year in which this Report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. The District Diagram is filed under separate cover with the City Clerk.

PART IV
Method of Apportionment of the Assessments: This part describes the method of apportionment of assessments, based upon parcel classification of land within the District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received. The costs and expenses of the District have been assessed upon the parcels of land within the boundaries of District pursuant to the initial methodology established at the time of formation. For particulars as to the identification of parcels, reference is made to the District Diagram.

Appendices
Appendix A – Financial Summary
Appendix B – Assessment Roll
Appendix C – District Diagram
Appendix D – Capital Replacement
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed to the lots and parcels within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the services provided.

DATED this day of July, 2025
___________________________________________
Alison Bouley, P.E., Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. No. C61383
Engineer of Work
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Industrial Park Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3279 : Resolution No. 2025-37 Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

3 PART I – DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS
Description of Improvements

INTRODUCTION
City Staff has contracted with Harris & Associates (“Harris”) to complete the annual administration process for all of City’s assessment districts. In addition to this required annual process, Harris will conduct assessment district fund balance and capital asset replacement cash flow analysis to confirm and ensure that the City’s assessment districts annually assess property owners only for the essential funding to complete ongoing maintenance activities and finance timely capital replacement as assets reach the end of their useable lifecycles.

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT
Gonzales Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District is generally described as a district bounded on the Northwest by Lands of Meyer; on the Southeast by existing parcels fronting Gonzales River Road (Vol. 1, Page 163, Volume 19 of Surveys, Page 67, and Volume 20 Cities and Towns, Page 13); on the Southwest by Lands of Hibino (Reel 514, Page 1002); and on the Northeast by Lands of Meyer, City of Gonzales, and Silva Harvesting, Inc.

The District was formed in 2003 to provide a dedicated funding source for the maintenance and operation of District improvements as described below. In Fiscal Year 2019/20, there were additional parcels annexed into the District. The area annexed (the “Annexation”) is located to the northeast of the existing District and totals 13.451 acres owned by the Mann Packing Company. The Annexation includes Assessor’s parcel numbers 020-021-002, 020-021-007 and 202-021- 008. The annexed parcels will be assessed at the same rate as the existing District parcels and they are included in the assessment roll shown in Appendix B.

COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
Assessments are levied annually pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, Chapter 6.4 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code (“1982 Act”). All assessments described in this Report and approved by the City Council are prepared in accordance with the 1982 Act and are in compliance with the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIIID (“Article XIIID”), which was enacted with the passage of Proposition 218 (“Prop 218”) in November 1996.

SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AND EXPENDITURES
A summary of the assessments to be levied is shown in the table below:

Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Industrial Park Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3279 : Resolution No. 2025-37 Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
4 LEVEL OF MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROVIDED
Maintenance and operation of the following described improvements of a local nature on public lands within said district including storm water retention pond silt removal and bank stabilization and percolation, including necessary cleaning, repairs, replacement, electric current, supervision, debris removal, pest abatement, engineering and inspection and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for the proper maintenance and operation thereof. All additions, improvements and enlargements thereto which may hereafter be made on the following described work within the following area and appurtenant improvement plans:

Puente Del Monte Avenue, Katherine Street and Alpine Drive: All as said streets are shown on that certain map titled “Gonzales Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District” on file with the City Clerk.

Storm Water Retention Pond: Improvements to be constructed within approximately 4.32 acres within the area shown as Assessment Parcel Number 2 on Exhibit B.

Incidental costs including contingencies, and assessment district incidentals including engineering, printing, and notices to property owners, collection costs, legal fees, administration and supervision, are assessed to the District on the same basis as the improvements specified above.

Pursuant to the 1982 Act:
"Maintain" or "maintenance" means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement.
"Service" or "servicing" means the furnishing of electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other improvements.

Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Industrial Park Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3279 : Resolution No. 2025-37 Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
5 PART II – ESTIMATE OF COSTS
Estimate of Costs
All improvements within the District are maintained and serviced on a regular basis. Based upon the available revenues generated by the assessment, City staff determines the frequency and specific maintenance operations which can be provided in a given year.

The proposed budget is shown on the following page. This includes an estimate of the costs of utilities, operations, services, administration and maintenance associated with the improvements within the District, including all labor, personnel, equipment, materials and administrative expenses. The budget summary also shows the estimated fund balance and the projected fund reserves that will be available and may be required based upon the estimated expenditures and assessment revenue.

Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Industrial Park Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3279 : Resolution No. 2025-37 Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
6 Annual
Budget

EXPENDITURES
Maintenance and Servicing
Street Sweeping
1 $0
Other Contractual Services $25,000
Inspection and Overhead $2,000
Street Repairs/Pot Holes $12,000
Percolation Pond Maintenance $7,104
Maintenance and Servicing Subtotal $46,104
Utilities - Street Lighting $2,200
Capital Replacement/Repair Collection
2 Percolation Pond Maintenance $4,000
Street Lighting Reserve $4,500
Storm Drain Capital Repair $3,000
Street Resurfacing/Striping and Street Sign Replacement 3 $15,000
Capital Replacement/Repair Subtotal $26,500
Capital Outlay
4 (Street rehabilitation) $350,000
Street Rehabilitation Project
District Administration
City Staff (YE Transfers GF) $13,500
City Administration $3,500
Engineering (Surveys & Assessment) $1,000
Contractual Services $227
Supplies, Printing & Advertising Notices $69
Legal Counsel $1,800
Legal and Accounting Services $0
County Collection Fee $288
Contingency $3,740
District Administration Subtotal $24,124
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $448,928

REVENUES & ADJUSTMENTS
Actual/Estimated Assessments $115,247
Actual/Estimated Use of Money and Property $22,418
Transfer (To)/From Fund Balance $311,263
TOTAL REVENUES & ADJUSTMENTS $448,928

OPERATING RESERVE FUND BALANCE
5 Estimated Balance 7/1/2025 $49,464
Estimated Addition/(Reduction) $0
Estimated Interest Income $1,979
Estimated Balance 6/30/2026 $51,443

CAPITAL RESERVE FUND BALANCE
Estimated Balance 7/1/2025 $510,991
Estimated Addition/(Reduction) ($311,263)
Estimated Interest Income $20,440
Estimated Balance 6/30/2026 $220,167

ANNUAL LEVY SUMMARY
Total Commercial Parcels Levied 15
Total Commercial Assessable Acreage 76.83
Maximum Assessment per Acre $1,513.56
Proposed Assessment per Acre $1,500.00
Assessment Needed to Fully Fund $1,287.60
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Industrial Park Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3279 : Resolution No. 2025-37 Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
7 A street rehabilitation project is scheduled for the District during the 2025 calendar year, using $350,000 from the Capital Reserve fund.

Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Industrial Park Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3279 : Resolution No. 2025-37 Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
8 PART III – DISTRICT DIAGRAM
District Diagram
The boundaries of the Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District are shown on the map in Appendix C. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions as shown on the maps of the Monterey County Assessor for the year in which this Report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. The District Diagram is also filed under separate cover with the City Clerk.

Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Industrial Park Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3279 : Resolution No. 2025-37 Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

9 PART IV – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
Method of Apportionment
GENERAL PROVISIONS – SPECIAL BENEFIT
Pursuant to the 1982 Act and Article XIIID, all parcels that receive a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5, of the Government Code, the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, permits the establishment of assessment districts by Cities for the purpose of providing certain public improvements that include street maintenance.

Section 54711 of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states:
(a) No benefit assessment shall be levied pursuant to this chapter unless it meets all of the following requirements:
(1) The amount of the assessment imposed on any parcel of property shall be related to the benefit to the parcel which will be derived from the provision of the service. Except as provided in subdivision (d) or (e) of Section 54715, in the case of a benefit assessment for flood control services, the benefit must be determined on the basis of the proportionate storm water runoff from each parcel. In the case of an assessment for the maintenance of streets, roads, or highways, the benefit shall be in proportion to the estimated traffic volume to be generated by each parcel assessed, or by any other reasonable basis as determined by the legislative body. (2) The annual aggregate amount of the assessment shall not exceed the estimated annual cost of providing the service.
(3) The revenue derived from the assessment shall not be used to pay the cost of any service other than the service for which the assessment was levied.

The 1982 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district.

Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways.

Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Industrial Park Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3279 : Resolution No. 2025-37 Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
10 The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. The costs for the operation, maintenance and servicing of the improvements maintained for each zone are apportioned in accordance with the methodology which was established by the City Council upon formation of the District.

GENERAL PROVISIONS – GENERAL BENEFIT
Although the improvements may include public streets and drainage facilities that connect to similar facilities outside the District’ boundaries, the construction, maintenance and operation of these improvements are only necessary for the development of properties within the District. As such, these improvements were not required nor necessarily desired by any properties or developments outside the District’ boundaries and any public access or use of the improvements by others is incidental. Therefore, it has been determined that the ongoing maintenance, servicing and operation of the District’s improvements provide no measurable general benefit to properties outside the District or to the public at large, but clearly provide distinct and special benefits to properties within the District.

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The District is assessed, on the basis of total development units generated, for the maintenance and operation of the Gonzales Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District including incidentals and appurtenances and shall include all the costs of the improvements described herein.

All costs associated with the maintenance and operation of the District improvements including Engineer’s Report, printing and advertising of assessment notices and legal fees shall be spread to all parcels on a pro-rata, net acreage basis.

Chapter 6.4 of Division 2 of the California Government Code, the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of financing the operation, maintenance and servicing of drainage, flood control, street lighting, and street improvements, and installation and improvement of drainage and flood improvements. Section 54711 of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 requires that assessments be levied according to benefit derived from the provided service. In addition, Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property.

Article XIIID provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Excepted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways, and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private commercial, industrial and institutional activities.

The improvements to be maintained and operated as a result of the formation of the Gonzales Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District are either in existence or were installed simultaneously with the development of commercial/industrial property units within the District. All such improvements were installed within or in areas in close proximity to the commercial/light industrial property.

Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Industrial Park Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3279 : Resolution No. 2025-37 Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

11 As a result of the foregoing, the commercial industrial property will receive 100% of the special benefits of the operation, maintenance and servicing of drainage, flood control, street lighting and street improvements. These special benefits include enhanced neighborhood health and safety, and improved quality of life, generated when drainage, flood control and street improvements are in place, improved, operable, safe, clean and maintained. In short, maintenance and operation of the proposed improvements will provide beautification, protection of improved property, enhanced comfort and increase the desirability of the immediate surroundings of the commercial industrial property within the District.

Because of the location of the improvements either within or close to the District itself, there is no general benefit to properties outside the District or the community as a whole, or a general benefit that is so negligible; it cannot be calculated for purposes of assessment.

As such, all costs associated with the maintenance and operation of Gonzales Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District improvements, including incidentals and appurtenances, shall be spread to all property within the District on a net acreage of property basis. Said property also abuts or obtains primary access from a public street.

In order to determine the appropriate assessment for the property, a budget for operation and maintenance costs associated with planned improvements in the entire Gonzales Industrial Park was prepared. In some instances, the total cost of operation and maintenance of a given improvement must be collected on an annual basis. Since the developed property in the District is the only property that derives special benefit from such activities, said property initially must bear its pro-rata share cost of operation and maintenance. The City of Gonzales will bear the additional cost of maintenance until all properties within the District are developed. If additional commercial industrial properties gain access to the improvements constructed as part of Gonzales Industrial Park project, the cost for maintaining the improvements will be re-allocated with the additional net acreage included. It is anticipated that assessments levied in this manner will be decreased as additional properties are added to the District and derive benefit from the operation and maintenance of such improvements.

Assessable acreage in the District is: 76.831 acres
Monterey County charges 0.25% of the levy amount for collection for administration of the District.

Assessments may be adjusted annually based on the April Consumer Price Index of the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Area All Urban Consumers Index (CPI-U). Adjustments are based on the change of the Consumer Price Index prior year/month as compared to the year/month assessments are determined (benchmark month for this district is April). The following table shows the prior year actual and maximum assessment rate per EDU, the annual CPI-U adjustment for the current fiscal year, the current year calculated maximum assessment, the assessment unit of measure, and the current year applied assessment rate.

Prior Year Prior Year April to April Current Year Current Year Applied
Assessment Rate
Maximum
Assessment Rate
% adjustment in the
SF/Oak/Hay CPI-U
Maximum
Assessment Rate
Unit of
Measure
Applied
Assessment Rate
$1,305.00 $1,494.59 1.270% $1,513.56 Acre $1,500.00
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Industrial Park Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3279 : Resolution No. 2025-37 Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
12 APPENDIX A – FINANCIAL SUMMARY
2024-25 Financial Summary
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Industrial Park Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3279 : Resolution No. 2025-37 Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
13 APPENDIX B – ASSESSMENT ROLL
Assessment Roll
The proposed assessment and the amount of the assessment apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the latest roll at the Assessor’s Office, is shown in Appendix A. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the Assessor of the County of Monterey and those records are, by reference, made part of this report. The assessments shown will be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller and included on the property tax bill for each parcel shown in the assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Industrial Park Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3279 : Resolution No. 2025-37 Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 14 APPENDIX C – DISTRICT DIAGRAMS District Diagrams
District diagrams are shown on the following pages. Also included is a diagram showing the boundaries of three parcels (020-021-002, 020- 021-007 & 020-021-008) annexed into the District in Fiscal Year 2019-20.

Packet Pg. 228
Attachment: Industrial Park Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3279 : Resolution No. 2025-37 Industrial Park Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 15 Packet Pg. 229
Attachment: Industrial Park Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3279 : Resolution No. 2025-37 Industrial Park Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 16 Packet Pg. 230
Attachment: Industrial Park Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3279 : Resolution No. 2025-37 Industrial Park Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 17 APPENDIX D – CAPITAL REPLACEMENT Capital Replacement The Capital Replacement Reserve information for Street Resurfacing and Street Sign Replacement is shown below:

Packet Pg. 231
Attachment: Industrial Park Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3279 : Resolution No. 2025-37 Industrial Park Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 18 Packet Pg. 232
Attachment: Industrial Park Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3279 : Resolution No. 2025-37 Industrial Park Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Benefit Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 19 Packet Pg. 233
Attachment: Industrial Park Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3279 : Resolution No. 2025-37 Industrial Park RESOLUTION NO. 2025-38

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GONZALES PROVIDING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF ENGINEER’S REPORT, STATING

INTENTION TO CONFIRM DIAGRAM AND TO LEVY AND COLLECT ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972

GONZALES INDUSTRIAL PARK LANDSCAPE

MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the Gonzales Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District was formed in 2003 to provide a dedicated funding source for the maintenance and operation of District improvements, and the boundaries of the District were adjusted in Fiscal Year 2018- 2019 to include additional property annexed to the District; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the Gonzales City Council (the “Council”) to confirm the diagram for and to levy and collect assessments in the Gonzales Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District for the purpose of maintaining, operating and/or servicing of public lands and improvements pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the “Act”), being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (commencing with Section 22500) and as provided by Article XIIID of the California Constitution; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, Harris & Associates, the designated Engineer of Work of the City of Gonzales (the “City”) has filed with the City Clerk an Engineer’s Report (the “Report”) for the District called for under said Act; and WHEREAS, the Council has given preliminary consideration to the Report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said Report is sufficient, and that neither said Report, nor any part thereof requires or should be modified in any respect.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Gonzales as follows:

1. With respect to the Gonzales Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, the Council finds:
• That the plans and specifications in said Report are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed.
• That the Engineer’s itemized and total costs and expenses of said maintenance, operation and/or servicing of public lands and improvements and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said Report are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed.

Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-38 (3280 : Resolution No. 2025-38 Industrial Park Landscape Assessment District Intention to Confirm AGENDA
ITEM
18 • That the diagrams showing the assessment district and the boundaries and dimensions of the respective subdivisions of land within the assessment district be, and are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. • That the proposed assessments upon the several subdivisions of land in said assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such subdivisions, respectively, from said maintenance, operation and/or servicing of public lands and improvements, and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said Report, be, and they are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed.
• That the maps and descriptions of the lands and easements to be acquired, if any, contained in said Report be, and the same are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed.
• That the proposed maximum annual assessments upon each of the several subdivisions of land in the assessment district to pay costs incurred by the City and not otherwise reimbursed which result from the administration and collection of assessments, as contained in said Report are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed.
• That said Report is preliminarily approved and confirmed as a whole and shall stand as the Engineer’s Report for the purpose of all subsequent proceedings.

2. The Council hereby finds that the public interest and convenience requires, and as such declares its intention to levy and collect assessments against the assessable lots and parcels of land within the District referenced herein for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, all pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Article XIIID of the California Constitution.

3. The public improvements and lands to be maintained, operated and/or serviced are generally described in the Gonzales Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, incorporated herein by reference.

4. The proposed assessment district is generally described as follows:

Gonzales Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District- a district bounded on the northwest by Lands of Meyer, on the southeast by existing parcels fronting Gonzales River Road (Vol. 1, Page 163, Volume 19 of Surveys, Page 67, and Volume 20 Cities and Towns, Page 13); on the southwest by Lands of Hibino (Reel 514, Page 1002); and on the northeast by Lands of Meyer, City of Gonzales, and Silva Harvesting, Inc.; and property to the northeast of the above-described boundaries consisting of 13.451 acres, including assessor’s parcels 020-021-002, 020-021-007, and 202-021-008.

5. Reference to the Engineer’s Report, on file with the City Clerk, is hereby made for a full and detailed description of the public improvements, the boundaries of the assessment Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-38 (3280 : Resolution No. 2025-38 Industrial Park Landscape Assessment District Intention to Confirm district, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the assessment district.

6. It is ordered that Monday, July 21, 2025, at 6:00 p.m., in the regular meeting place of said Council, Council Chambers, 117 Fourth Street, Gonzales, California, is hereby appointed and fixed for the public hearing and time and place when and where the Council will consider and act upon the Engineer’s Report, confirm the District diagram, and the levy of the proposed assessment, if any.

7. The City Clerk is directed to give notice of the hearing by one publication of a copy of this Resolution in the local newspaper published and circulated in said City, pursuant to Section 6061 of the California Government Code.

8. The proposed assessments will increase from the assessments established for the District in Fiscal Year 2024-2025, from $440 to $575 per acre. The District Maximum Assessment will be adjusted by the CPI, which has been set at 1.270%.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Gonzales duly held on the 2nd day of June, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Jose L. Rios, The Honorable Mayor
ATTEST:

I, the undersigned Deputy City Clerk, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the City Council of the City of Gonzales, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2
nd day of June, 2025, by the above-stated vote of the members thereof, a majority being present.

Dated: June 2, 2025
Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-38 (3280 : Resolution No. 2025-38 Industrial Park Landscape Assessment District Intention to Confirm

CITY OF GONZALES
PRELIMINARY ENGINEER’S REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

INDUSTRIAL PARK LANDSCAPE

MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FUND #314
July 2025

PREPARED BY
Harris & Associates
60 W. Alisal Street, Suite 200
Salinas, CA 93901
www.weareharris.com
Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Industrial Park Landscape Report FY 25-26 (3280 : Resolution No. 2025-38 Industrial Park Landscape Assessment District Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

INDUSTRIAL PARK LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT City of Gonzales
Monterey County
State of California

APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE INDUSTRIAL PARK LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF GONZALES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON THE _____ DAY OF _________, 2025.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with me on the ________day of ______________, 2025.

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
City of Gonzales, Monterey County, CA
_________________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Gonzales, California on the ________day of ______________, 2025.

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
City of Gonzales, Monterey County, CA
__________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Monterey on the ________day of ______________, 2025.

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
City of Gonzales, Monterey County, CA
__________________________
Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Industrial Park Landscape Report FY 25-26 (3280 : Resolution No. 2025-38 Industrial Park Landscape Assessment District Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
Certifications…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………i Statement of Assessment Engineer…………………………………………………………………………………..….1 Description of Improvements……………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Estimate of Costs………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….6 District Diagram…………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………..9 Method of Apportionment………………………………………………………………………………………………….10 Appendix A – 2024-25 Financial Summary ………………………………………………………………………….13 Appendix B – Assessment Roll ……………………………………………………………………………….………..….14 Appendix C – District Diagrams ……………………………………………………………………………..…………...15 Appendix D – Capital Replacement ………………………………………………………………………….………….17 Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Industrial Park Landscape Report FY 25-26 (3280 : Resolution No. 2025-38 Industrial Park Landscape Assessment District Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
1 STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
Statement of Assessment Engineer
AGENCY: CITY OF GONZALES
PROJECT: INDUSTRIAL PARK LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TO: THE CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF GONZALES

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
The preparation of this Annual Engineer’s Report (“Report”) is in conformance with the obligation of the City Council for the Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District of the City of Gonzales to provide drainage services upon each lot or parcel of land in the district in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel of land for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 22500) (the “Act”), Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the State of California Constitution, and in accordance with the City of Gonzales’ Resolution adopted by the City Council, this Report has been ordered for:

INDUSTRIAL PARK LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (Hereinafter referred to as the “District”),
I, Alison Bouley, authorized representative of the District, the duly appointed Assessment Engineer submit the following Report which consists of the following four (4) parts and Appendices:

PART I
Description of Improvements: This part provides a general description of improvements proposed to be maintained in the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are on file with the City.

PART II
Estimate of Cost: This part contains the cost estimate of the proposed maintenance including incidental costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Industrial Park Landscape Report FY 25-26 (3280 : Resolution No. 2025-38 Industrial Park Landscape Assessment District Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
2 PART III
District Diagram: This part incorporates a Diagram of the District showing the external boundaries of the District. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Monterey County Assessor for the year in which this Report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. The District Diagram is filed under separate cover with the City Clerk.

PART IV
Method of Apportionment of the Assessments: This part describes the method of apportionment of assessments, based upon parcel classification of land within the District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received. The costs and expenses of the District have been assessed upon the parcels of land within the boundaries of District pursuant to the initial methodology established at the time of formation. For particulars as to the identification of parcels, reference is made to the District Diagram.

Appendices
Appendix A – Financial Summary
Appendix B – Assessment Roll
Appendix C – District Diagrams
Appendix D – Capital Replacement
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed to the lots and parcels within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the services provided.

DATED this day of July, 2025
___________________________________________
Alison Bouley, P.E., Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. No. C61383
Engineer of Work
Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Industrial Park Landscape Report FY 25-26 (3280 : Resolution No. 2025-38 Industrial Park Landscape Assessment District Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
3 PART I – DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS
Description of Improvements

INTRODUCTION
City Staff has contracted with Harris & Associates (“Harris”) to complete the annual administration process for all of City’s assessment districts. In addition to this required annual process, Harris will conduct assessment district fund balance and capital asset replacement cash flow analysis to confirm and ensure that the City’s assessment districts annually assess property owners only for the essential funding to complete ongoing maintenance activities and finance timely capital replacement as assets reach the end of their useable lifecycles.

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT
Gonzales Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District is generally described as a district bounded on the Northwest by Lands of Meyer; on the Southeast by existing parcels fronting Gonzales River Road (Vol. 1, Page 163, Volume 19 of Surveys, Page 67, and Volume 20 Cities and Towns, Page 13); on the Southwest by Lands of Hibino (Reel 514, Page 1002); and on the Northeast by Lands of Meyer, City of Gonzales, and Silva Harvesting, Inc.

The District was formed in 2003 to provide a dedicated funding source for the maintenance and operation of the improvements as shown herein. In Fiscal Year 2019-20, there were additional parcels annexed into the District. The area annexed (the “Annexation”) is located to the northeast of the existing District and totals 13.451 acres owned by the Mann Packing Company. The Annexation includes Assessor’s parcel numbers 020-021-002; 020-021-007 and 202-021-008. The annexed parcels will be assessed at the same rate as the existing District parcels and they are included in the assessment roll shown in Appendix B.

The improvements include landscaping and irrigation improvements, including planter walls and fences, monument signs, appurtenant irrigation systems; ornamental plantings including lawns, shrubs, and trees; including repairs, replacements, water, electric current, spraying, care, supervision, debris removal, and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for the proper maintenance and operation.

Puente Del Monte Avenue (formerly Industrial Drive), located in a strip of land approximately 10 feet in width from face of curb lines including planter walls and curb returns from Gonzales River Road Northwest 300± lineal feet as said street is shown on that certain map titled Gonzales Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance District, Exhibit B, on file with the City Clerk.

Maintenance and operation of any or all public landscaping and irrigation improvements, of a local nature, on landscaped strips or parcels of land of the following described areas, including retention pond landscaping, fencing and bank protection, appurtenant irrigation systems; ornamental plantings including lawns, shrubs, and trees; including necessary repairs, replacements, water, electric current, spraying, care, supervision, debris removal, and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for the proper maintenance and operation thereof and all additions, improvements and enlargements thereto which may hereafter be made on the following described work:

Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Industrial Park Landscape Report FY 25-26 (3280 : Resolution No. 2025-38 Industrial Park Landscape Assessment District Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

4 Storm Water Retention Pond and appurtenant access and irrigation as said parcel is to be configured of approximately

4.5 acres within Assessment Parcel 2 in Appendix B (locations and configuration to be determined).

Incidental costs including contingencies, and assessment district incidentals including engineering, printing, and notices to property owners, collection costs, legal fees, administration and supervision, are assessed to the District on the same basis as the improvements specified above.

COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
Assessments are levied annually pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (“1972 Act”). All assessments described in this Report and approved by the City Council are prepared in accordance with the 1972 Act and are in compliance with the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIIID (“Article XIIID”), which was enacted with the passage of Proposition 218 (“Prop 218”) in November 1996.

SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AND EXPENDITURES
A summary of the assessments to be levied is shown in the table below:

LEVEL OF MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROVIDED
All costs associated with the maintenance and operation of the District improvements including the Engineer’s Report, printing and advertising of assessment notices, County collection fees and legal fees all of which shall be spread to all parcels on a pro-rata development unit basis.

One hundred percent (100%) of all costs associated with the maintenance and operation of the District improvements including incidentals and appurtenances are of special benefit to parcels within the District and shall be spread to all parcels within the District on a pro-rata net acreage basis.

Pursuant to the 1972 Act:
"Maintain" or "maintenance" means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement.
"Service" or "servicing" means the furnishing of electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other improvements.

Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Industrial Park Landscape Report FY 25-26 (3280 : Resolution No. 2025-38 Industrial Park Landscape Assessment District Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

5 PART II – ESTIMATE OF COSTS
Estimate of Costs
All improvements within the District are maintained and serviced on a regular basis. Based upon the available revenues generated by the assessment, City staff determines the frequency and specific maintenance operations which can be provided in a given year.

The proposed budget is shown on the following page. This includes an estimate of the costs of utilities, operations, services, administration and maintenance associated with the improvements within the district, including all labor, personnel, equipment, materials and administrative expenses. The budget summary also shows the estimated fund balance and the projected fund reserves that will be available and may be required based upon the estimated expenditures and assessment revenue.

Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Industrial Park Landscape Report FY 25-26 (3280 : Resolution No. 2025-38 Industrial Park Landscape Assessment District Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
6 Annual Budget

EXPENDITURES
Maintenance and Servicing
Parkway & Percolation Pond Landscape Maintenance $9,782 Parkway Water Charges $750
Other Contractual Services $17,500
Monument Sign Maintenance $0
Maintenance and Servicing Subtotal $28,032
Utilities - Parkway & Pond Electrical Charges $461
Capital Replacement/Repair Collection 1
Fence Reserve $1,176
Street Repair $5,000
Sound Wall Repair $2,000
Capital Replacement/Repair Subtotal $8,176
Capital Outlay $0
District Administration
City Staff (YE Transfers GF) $1,425
City Administration $4,500
City Labor and Overhead 2
$11,206
Engineering (Surveys & Assessment) $817
Supplies, Printing & Advertising Notices $69
Legal Counsel $1,500
Legal and Accounting Services $0
County Collection Fee $110
Contingency $1,833
District Administration Subtotal $21,460
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $58,129

REVENUES & ADJUSTMENTS
Actual/Estimated Assessments $44,178
Actual/Estimated Use of Money and Property $5,482
Transfer (To)/From Fund Balance $8,469
TOTAL REVENUES & ADJUSTMENTS $58,129
OPERATING RESERVE FUND BALANCE 3
Estimated Balance 7/1/2025 $24,976
Estimated Addition/(Reduction) $0
Estimated Interest Income $999
Estimated Balance 6/30/2026 $25,975

CAPITAL RESERVE FUND BALANCE
Estimated Balance 7/1/2025 $112,081
Estimated Addition/(Reduction) ($8,469)
Estimated Interest Income $4,483
Estimated Balance 6/30/2026 $108,095

ANNUAL LEVY SUMMARY
Total Commercial Parcels Levied 15
Total Commercial Assessable Acreage 76.83
Maximum Assessment per Acre $578.78
Assessment per Acre $575.00
Assessment Needed to Fully Fund $756.58
Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Industrial Park Landscape Report FY 25-26 (3280 : Resolution No. 2025-38 Industrial Park Landscape Assessment District Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

7 Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Industrial Park Landscape Report FY 25-26 (3280 : Resolution No. 2025-38 Industrial Park Landscape Assessment District Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

8 PART III – DISTRICT DIAGRAMS
District Diagrams
The boundaries of the Industrial Park Landscape and Maintenance Assessment District are shown on the maps in Appendix C. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions as shown on the maps of the Monterey County Assessor for the year in which this Report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. The District Diagram is also filed under separate cover with the City Clerk.

Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Industrial Park Landscape Report FY 25-26 (3280 : Resolution No. 2025-38 Industrial Park Landscape Assessment District Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
9 PART IV – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
Method of Apportionment

GENERAL PROVISIONS
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value:
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on estimated benefit to each parcel. In addition, pursuant to Prop 218:
“No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Only special benefits are assessable and an agency shall separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel.”

BENEFIT ANALYSIS
Each of the improvements have been carefully reviewed by the City and the corresponding assessments have been proportionately spread to each parcel based on improvements as determined at the time the District was established.

General Benefits
The improvements within this District are a direct result of property development within the District and would otherwise not be required or necessary. Developers typically install landscape improvements to enhance the marketability and value of properties within the development and/or as conditions of development. In either case, the improvements are clearly installed for the benefit of the properties developed and not for the benefit of surrounding properties.

Although many landscape improvements (by virtue of their location), may be visible to surrounding properties or to the public at large, any benefit to surrounding properties is incidental and cannot be considered a direct and special benefit to those properties. Therefore, it has been determined that the improvements within this District and the ongoing operation and maintenance of those improvements are clearly a direct and special benefit to properties within the District.

Unless otherwise noted, these improvements provide no measurable general benefit to properties outside the District or to the public at large.

Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Industrial Park Landscape Report FY 25-26 (3280 : Resolution No. 2025-38 Industrial Park Landscape Assessment District Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
10 Special Benefits
The method of apportionment (assessment methodology) approved at the time the District was formed is based on the premise that each of the assessed parcels within the District receives benefit from the improvements maintained and financed by annual assessments. Specifically, the assessments are for the maintenance of local landscape and monument sign improvements. The desirability and safety of properties within the District are enhanced by the presence of wellmaintained landscaping and signage.

Non-Assessable Parcels
Within the boundaries of the District, there are properties that are considered to receive no special benefit from the District improvements and are therefore not assessed. Parcels owned by the City of Gonzales and Gonzales Six CA General Partnership are deemed to receive no benefit from the improvements and services and are therefore not assessed.

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The District is assessed, on the basis of total assessable acreage, for the maintenance and operation of the District improvements, including incidentals and appurtenances, and shall include all the costs of maintaining and/or operating the improvements described herein.

All costs associated with the maintenance and operation of the Gonzales Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District improvements including Engineer’s Report, printing and advertising of assessment notices and legal fees shall be spread to all parcels on a pro-rata, net acreage basis.

Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping, street lighting, and park and recreational facilities. Section 22573 of the Lighting and Landscaping Act of 1972 requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. In addition, Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property.

Article XIIID provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment.

Excepted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways, and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private commercial, industrial and institutional activities.

The improvements to be maintained and operated as a result of the formation of the Gonzales Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District were installed simultaneously with the development of commercial industrial property within the District. All the improvements were installed within or in areas in close proximity to the commercial industrial property.

Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Industrial Park Landscape Report FY 25-26 (3280 : Resolution No. 2025-38 Industrial Park Landscape Assessment District Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
11 As a result of the foregoing, the commercial industrial property, will receive all of the special benefits of the operation and maintenance of public landscaping. These special benefits include enhanced identity and quality of life, generated when landscaping is in place, improved, operable, safe, clean and maintained. In short, maintenance and operation of the proposed improvements will provide beautification and increase the desirability of the immediate surroundings of the industrial/commercial property within the District.

Assessable acreage in the District is: 76.831 acres
Monterey County charges 0.25% of the levy amount for collection for administration of the District.

Assessments may be adjusted annually based on the April Consumer Price Index of the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Area All Urban Consumers Index (CPI-U). Adjustments are based on the change of the Consumer Price Index prior year/month as compared to the year/month assessments are determined (benchmark month for this district is April). The following table shows the prior year actual and maximum assessment rate per EDU, the annual CPI-U adjustment for the current fiscal year, the current year calculated maximum assessment, the assessment unit of measure, and the current year applied assessment rate.

Prior Year Prior Year April to April Current Year Current Year Applied
Assessment Rate
Maximum
Assessment Rate
% adjustment in the
SF/Oak/Hay CPI-U
Maximum
Assessment Rate
Unit of
Measure
Applied
Assessment Rate
$440.00 $571.53 1.270% $578.78 Acres $575.00
Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Industrial Park Landscape Report FY 25-26 (3280 : Resolution No. 2025-38 Industrial Park Landscape Assessment District Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
12 APPENDIX A – FINANCIAL SUMMARY
2024-25 Financial Summary
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Industrial Park Landscape Report FY 25-26 (3280 : Resolution No. 2025-38 Industrial Park Landscape Assessment District Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
13 APPENDIX B – ASSESSMENT ROLL
Assessment Roll
The proposed assessment and the amount of the assessment apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the latest roll at the Assessor’s Office, is shown in Appendix A. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the Assessor of the County of Monterey and those records are, by reference, made part of this report. The assessments shown will be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller and included on the property tax bill for each parcel shown in the assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Industrial Park Landscape Report FY 25-26 (3280 : Resolution No. 2025-38 Industrial Park Landscape Assessment District Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 14 APPENDIX C – DISTRICT DIAGRAMS District Diagrams
Diagrams for the District is shown on the following pages. Also included is a diagram showing the boundaries of three parcels (020-021-002, 020-021-007 and 020-021-008) annexed into the District during the 2019-20 fiscal year.

Packet Pg. 253
Attachment: Industrial Park Landscape Report FY 25-26 (3280 : Resolution No. 2025-38 Industrial Park Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 15 Packet Pg. 254
Attachment: Industrial Park Landscape Report FY 25-26 (3280 : Resolution No. 2025-38 Industrial Park Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 16 Packet Pg. 255
Attachment: Industrial Park Landscape Report FY 25-26 (3280 : Resolution No. 2025-38 Industrial Park Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 17 APPENDIX D – CAPITAL REPLACEMENT Capital Replacement The following pages show a summary of the Capital Replacement costs for each District within the City, as well as the Capital Replacement detail of each identified item for this District.

Packet Pg. 256
Attachment: Industrial Park Landscape Report FY 25-26 (3280 : Resolution No. 2025-38 Industrial Park Engineer’s Report
Industrial Park Landscape Maintenance Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 18 Packet Pg. 257
Attachment: Industrial Park Landscape Report FY 25-26 (3280 : Resolution No. 2025-38 Industrial Park RESOLUTION NO. 2025-39

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GONZALES

DECLARING INTENTION TO CONFIRM DIAGRAM AND TO LEVY AND

COLLECT ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS PURSUANT TO THE
BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1982

CIPRIANI ESTATES BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council of the City of Gonzales (“Council”) to confirm the diagram for and to levy and collect assessments in the Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District for the purpose of maintaining, operating and/or servicing of public lands and improvements for parks and open space purposes pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 (the “Act”), being Title 5, Part 1, Division 2, Chapter 6.4 of the California Government Code (commencing with Section 54703 and as provided by Article XIIID of the California Constitution; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, Harris & Associates, the designated Engineer of Work of the City of Gonzales (the “City”) has made and filed with the City Clerk an Engineer’s Report (the “Report”) for the District called for under said Act; and WHEREAS, said Council has given preliminary consideration to said Report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said Report is sufficient, and that neither said Report, nor any part hereof requires or should be modified in any respect.

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Gonzales as follows:

1. The Council hereby finds that the public interest and convenience requires, and as such declares its intention to levy and collect assessments against the assessable lots and parcels of land with the District referenced herein for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, all pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 and Article XIIID of the California Constitution.

2. The public improvements and lands to be maintained, operated and/or serviced are generally described in the Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, incorporated herein by reference.

3. The involved assessment district is generally described as follows:

Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District- a district bounded on the northeast by US Route 101, on the southwest by Centennial (“C”) Street, on the southeast by winery property and on the northwest by existing Tract No. 888, Volume 14, Cities and Towns, Page 23, Monterey County Records.

4. Reference to the Engineer’s Report, on file with the City Clerk, is hereby made for a full and detailed description of public improvements, the boundaries of the assessment Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-39 (3281 : Resolution No. 2025-39 Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Diagrams) AGENDA
ITEM
19 district, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the assessment district.

5. It is ordered that Monday, July 21, 2025, at 6:00 p.m., in the regular meeting place of said Council, Council Chambers, 117 Fourth Street, Gonzales, California, is hereby appointed and fixed for the public hearing and time and place when and where the Council will consider and act upon the Engineer’s Report, confirm the District diagram, and the levy of the proposed assessment.

6. The City Clerk is directed to give notice of the hearing by one publication of a copy of this Resolution in the local newspaper published and circulated in said City, pursuant to Section 6061 of the California Government Code.

7. The proposed assessments will not increase from the assessments established for Lots 1-7 in Fiscal Year 2024-2025; the proposed assessments will decrease for Lots 8-66, 70-74 from the assessment levied in Fiscal Year 2024-2025, from $750 to $678. The District Maximum Assessment will be adjusted by the CPI, which has been set at 1.270%.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Gonzales duly held on the 2nd day of June, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Jose L. Rios, The Honorable Mayor
ATTEST:

I, the undersigned Deputy City Clerk, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the City Council of the City of Gonzales, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2
nd day of June, 2025, by the above-stated vote of the members thereof, a majority being present.

Dated: June 2, 2025
Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-39 (3281 : Resolution No. 2025-39 Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District Intention to Confirm Diagrams)

CITY OF GONZALES
PRELIMINARY ENGINEER’S REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

CIPRIANI ESTATES BENEFIT ASSESSMENT
FUND #312
July 2025

PREPARED BY
Harris & Associates
60 W. Alisal Street, Suite 200
Salinas, CA 93901
www.weareharris.com
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Cipriani Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3281 : Resolution No. 2025-39 Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

CIPRIANI ESTATES BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
City of Gonzales
Monterey County
State of California

APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CIPRIANI ESTATES BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF GONZALES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON THE _____ DAY OF _________, 2025.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with me on the ________day of ______________, 2025.

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
City of Gonzales, Monterey County, CA
_________________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Gonzales, California on the ________day of ______________, 2025.

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
City of Gonzales, Monterey County, CA
__________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Monterey on the ________day of ______________, 2025.

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
City of Gonzales, Monterey County, CA
__________________________
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Cipriani Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3281 : Resolution No. 2025-39 Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
Certifications…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………i Statement of Assessment Engineer…………………………………………………………………………………..….1 Plans and Specifications……………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Estimate of Costs………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….7 District Diagram…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...9 Method of Apportionment………………………………………………………………………………………………….10 Appendix A – 2024-25 Financial Summary ………………………………………………………………………….14 Appendix B – Assessment Roll ………………………………………………………………………………………..….15 Appendix C – District Diagram …………………………………………………………………………………………...24 Appendix D – Capital Replacement …………………………………………………………………………………….29 Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Cipriani Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3281 : Resolution No. 2025-39 Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
1 STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
Statement of Assessment Engineer
AGENCY: CITY OF GONZALES
PROJECT: CIIPRIANI ESTATES BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
TO: THE CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF GONZALES

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
The preparation of this Annual Engineer’s Report (“Report”) is in conformance with the obligation of the City Council for the Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District of the City of Gonzales to provide drainage services upon each lot or parcel of land in the district in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel of land for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, Chapter 6.4 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code (the “1982 Act”), Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the State of California Constitution, and in accordance with the City of Gonzales’ Resolution adopted by the City Council, this Report has been ordered for:

CIPRIANI ESTATES BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
(Hereinafter referred to as the “District”),
I, Alison Bouley, authorized representative of the District, the duly appointed Assessment Engineer submit the following Report which consists of the following four (4) parts and Appendices:

PART I
Description of Improvements: This part provides a general description of improvements proposed to be maintained in the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are on file with the City.

PART II
Estimate of Cost: This part contains the cost estimate of the proposed maintenance including incidental costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Cipriani Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3281 : Resolution No. 2025-39 Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
2 PART III
District Diagram: This part incorporates a Diagram of the District showing the external boundaries of the District. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Monterey County Assessor for the year in which this Report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. The District Diagram is filed under separate cover with the City Clerk.

PART IV
Method of Apportionment of the Assessments: This part describes the method of apportionment of assessments, based upon parcel classification of land within the District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received. The costs and expenses of the District have been assessed upon the parcels of land within the boundaries of District pursuant to the initial methodology established by Resolution No. 2004-61 approved on the 21st day of June, 2004. For particulars as to the identification of parcels, reference is made to the District Diagram.

Appendices
Appendix A – Financial Summary
Appendix B – Assessment Roll
Appendix C – District Diagram
Appendix D – Capital Replacement
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed to the lots and parcels within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the services provided.

DATED this day of July, 2025
___________________________________________
Alison Bouley, P.E., Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. No. C61383
Engineer of Work
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Cipriani Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3281 : Resolution No. 2025-39 Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
3 PART I – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Plans and Specifications

INTRODUCTION
City Staff has contracted with Harris & Associates (“Harris”) to complete the annual administration process for all of City’s assessment districts. In addition to this required annual process, Harris has conducted an assessment district fund balance and capital asset replacement cash flow analysis to confirm and ensure that the City’s assessment districts annually assess property owners only for the essential funding to complete ongoing maintenance activities and finance timely capital replacement as assets reach the end of their useable lifecycles.

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT
Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District is generally bounded on the northeast by State Route 101, on the southwest by Centennial (“C”) Street, on the southeast by the winery property and on the northwest by existing Tract No. 888, Volume 14, Cities and Towns, Page 23, Monterey County Records.

Maintenance and operation of the following described improvements of a local nature on public lands within said district including sweeping, streetlights and lighting costs, storm drain lines, including necessary cleaning, repairs, replacement, electric current, supervision, debris removal and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for the proper maintenance and operation of the street thereof. All additions, improvements and enlargements thereto which may hereafter be made on and within the following described Cipriani Street, Amore Court, Murano Court and Venice Way and appurtenant improvement plans. All as said streets are shown on that certain map titled “Cipriani Estates PUD Tentative Map Moreland Corporation” on file with the City Clerk.

COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
Assessments are levied annually pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, Chapter 6.4 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code (“1982 Act”). All assessments described in this Report and approved by the City Council are prepared in accordance with the 1982 Act and are in compliance with the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIIID (“Article XIIID”), which was enacted with the passage of Proposition 218 (“Prop 218”) in November 1996.

SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AND EXPENDITURES
Maintenance and operation of the following described improvements of a local nature on public lands benefiting said district including storm water retention pond silt removal and bank stabilization and percolation, including necessary cleaning, repairs, replacement, electric current, supervision, debris removal, pest abatement, engineering and inspection and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for proper maintenance and operation thereof. All additions, improvements and enlargements thereto which may hereafter be made on the following described work within the following area and appurtenant improvement plans:

Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Cipriani Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3281 : Resolution No. 2025-39 Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

4 Storm Water Retention Pond: Improvements as shown on those certain plans titled “Cipriani Estates Retention Basin Plan and Cross Sections” and “Cipriani Estates Sump Access Plan and Profile”, and any subsequent revisions and as on the approved Cipriani Estates Tentative Map.

Emergency Vehicle Access Road and Looped Water Main and Easements: Improvements as shown on the approved map titled, “Cipriani Estates PUD Tentative Map Moreland Corporation”.

Maintenance and operation of the following described improvements of a local nature on public easements within said district including sweeping, storm drain lines including necessary cleaning, repairs, replacement, supervision, debris removal, fence and wooden wall and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for the proper maintenance and operation of the facility thereof. All additions, improvements and enlargements thereto which may hereafter be made on and within the following described work and following described area and appurtenant improvement plans:

Storm Drain Easement Improvements and Appurtenances at the Rear of Lots 1 through 7 and Along the Easterly Side of Lot 7: Improvements as shown on the improvement plan titled “Fairview Estates Unit No. 2/Cipriani Estates Storm Drain Modifications” including a wooden wall.

Incidental costs including contingencies, and assessment district incidentals including engineering, printing, and notices to property owners, collection costs, legal fees, administration and supervision, are assessed to the District on the same basis as the improvements specified above.

Pursuant to the 1982 Act:
"Maintain" or "maintenance" means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement.
"Service" or "servicing" means the furnishing of electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other improvements.

Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Cipriani Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3281 : Resolution No. 2025-39 Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

5 PART II – ESTIMATE OF COSTS
Estimate of Costs
All improvements within the District are maintained and serviced on a regular basis. Based upon the available revenues generated by the assessment, City staff determines the frequency and specific maintenance operations which can be provided in a given year.

The proposed budget is shown on the following page. This includes an estimate of the costs of utilities, operations, services, administration and maintenance associated with the improvements within the District, including all labor, personnel, equipment, materials and administrative expenses. The budget summary also shows the estimated fund balance and the projected fund reserves that will be available and may be required based upon the estimated expenditures and assessment revenue.

Beginning in Fiscal Year 2021-22, the City combined the budget page to show only the total expenditures, revenues, etc. for the District, rather than showing the expenditures and revenues by individual phases of the development, as had been done in previous years.

Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Cipriani Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3281 : Resolution No. 2025-39 Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
6 Annual District Budget
(All Lots)

EXPENDITURES
Maintenance and Servicing
Percolation Pond Maintenance $4,467
Gonzales Slough
Rodent Abatement $588
Mosquito Abatement $236
Bank Vegetation Restoration $1,176
Weed Abatement $1,176
Slope Maintenance $2,351
Additional Storm Drain Maintenance (Lots 1-7) $2,922
Maintenance and Servicing Subtotal $12,916
Utilities $3,454
Capital Replacement/Repair Collection 3
Percolation Routine Maintenance $540
Percolation Pond Dredging $540
Street Repair $540
Street Lighting Reserve $1,671
Storm Drain Capital Repair $426
Street Resurfacing and Street Sign Replacement 4
$11,325
Capital Replacement/Repair Subtotal $15,042
Capital Outlay $0
District Administration
City Staff (YE Transfers GF) $8,500
City Administration $3,500
City Labor and Overhead 5
$4,484
Engineering (Surveys & Assessment) $817
Legal Counsel $1,500
Legal and Accounting Services $0
County Collection Fee $127
Contingency $1,571
District Administration Subtotal $20,499
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $51,911

REVENUES & ADJUSTMENTS
Actual/Estimated Assessments $50,756
Actual/Estimated Use of Money and Property $24,934
Transfer (To)/From Fund Balance ($23,779)
TOTAL REVENUES & ADJUSTMENTS $51,911
OPERATING RESERVE FUND BALANCE 6
Estimated Balance 7/1/2025 $25,955
Estimated Addition/(Reduction) $0
Estimated Interest Income $1,038
Estimated Balance 6/30/2026 $26,994

CAPITAL RESERVE FUND BALANCE
Estimated Balance 7/1/2025 $597,388
Estimated Addition/(Reduction) $23,779
Estimated Interest Income $23,896
Estimated Balance 6/30/2026 $645,063

ANNUAL LEVY SUMMARY
Total SFR Parcels Levied 71
Total SFR EDUs 71.00
Maximum Assessment per EDU Varies*
Assessment per EDU Varies*
Assessment Needed to Fully Fund Varies*
Definitions: SFR = Single Family Residential Parcel(s); EDU = Equivalent Dwelling Unit * Refer to Budget Footnotes for Assessment Rates for each phase Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Cipriani Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3281 : Resolution No. 2025-39 Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

7 Budget Footnotes
1 Lots 67-69 are owned by the City of Gonzales, comprise the subdivision's Tot Lot and do not benefit from the improvements. 2 Regularly scheduled street sweeping services are performed by Franchise Waste Hauler. Any services above and beyond said regularly scheduled services will be billed to and paid for the the District 3 For capital replacement reserve items shown above, some of the costs are from the original Engineer's Report for the districts prepared in 2004. The cost for these items are shown below in 2004 dollars and escalated to year end 2016 dollars by the increase in the ENR-CCI for San Francisco for the same period. Details regarding capital replacemennt costs for the other items shown above are provided in Appendix D.

Capital Replacement Item Collection Yrs 2004 Cost 2016 Cost Annual Cost Percolation Routine Maintenance 10 $38,000 $53,991 $5,399 Percolation Pond Dredging 10 $38,000 $53,991 $5,399
Street Lighting Reserve 1 $1,176 $1,671 $1,671
Storm Drain Capital Repair 5 $7,500 $10,656 $2,131
4 See Appendix D for detailed cost breakdown for these items. 5 Items included in this category include salaries, overtime, Workers's Comp, Retirement & Insurance (Life, Health & FICA). 6 The Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District has 2 separate phases. The assessment amounts for each are as follows:

Phase 1 SFR lots 1-7 Maximum Assessment $1,568.54. Actual Assessment $1,052.04 . Assessment needed to fully fund $1,126.25 Phase 2 SFR lots 8-66 & 70-74 Maximum Assessment $978.31. Actual Assessment $678.00 . Assessment needed to fully fund $687.92 Beginning in Fiscal Year 2017/18, a Capital Reserve Fund was established for the District. The amounts collected for the current year, if any, are shown in the Budget table. The Beginning Balance for the Capital Reserve Fund is transferred from the Operating Reserve Fund.

The amounts in the Operating Reserve Fund should be sufficient to pay for the operations and maintenance costs for the first six months of the fiscal year, approximately 50% of the total Reserve Balance. Any additional funds over and above the 50% to the Operating Reserve are shown in the Capital Reserve Fun balance. Any addition to or (reduction from) the Capital Reserve Fund will be shown and calculated annually in the same manner as the Operating Reserve Fund. Also, any funds collected for Capital Reserve and not spent, will be included in the ending Capital Reserve fund balance the following year.

Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Cipriani Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3281 : Resolution No. 2025-39 Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

8 PART III – DISTRICT DIAGRAM
District Diagram
The boundaries of the Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District are shown on the map in Appendix C. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions as shown on the maps of the Monterey County Assessor for the year in which this Report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. The District Diagram is also filed under separate cover with the City Clerk.

Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Cipriani Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3281 : Resolution No. 2025-39 Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
9 PART IV – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
Method of Apportionment
GENERAL PROVISIONS – SPECIAL BENEFIT
Pursuant to the 1982 Act and Article XIIID, all parcels that receive a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Chapter 6.4, Division 2, Title 5, of the Government Code, the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, permits the establishment of assessment districts by Cities for the purpose of providing certain public improvements that include street maintenance.

Section 54711 of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states:
(a) No benefit assessment shall be levied pursuant to this chapter unless it meets all of the following requirements:
(1) The amount of the assessment imposed on any parcel of property shall be related to the benefit to the parcel which will be derived from the provision of the service. Except as provided in subdivision (d) or (e) of Section 54715, in the case of a benefit assessment for flood control services, the benefit must be determined on the basis of the proportionate storm water runoff from each parcel. In the case of an assessment for the maintenance of streets, roads, or highways, the benefit shall be in proportion to the estimated traffic volume to be generated by each parcel assessed, or by any other reasonable basis as determined by the legislative body.
(2) The annual aggregate amount of the assessment shall not exceed the estimated annual cost of providing the service.
(3) The revenue derived from the assessment shall not be used to pay the cost of any service other than the service for which the assessment was levied.

The 1982 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district.

Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways.

The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. The costs for the operation, maintenance and servicing of the improvements maintained for each zone are apportioned in accordance with the methodology which was established by the City Council upon formation of the District.

Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Cipriani Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3281 : Resolution No. 2025-39 Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

10 GENERAL PROVISIONS – GENERAL BENEFIT
Although the improvements may include public streets and drainage facilities that connect to similar facilities outside the District’ boundaries, the construction, maintenance and operation of these improvements are only necessary for the development of properties within the District. As such, these improvements were not required nor necessarily desired by any properties or developments outside the District’ boundaries and any public access or use of the improvements by others is incidental. Therefore, it has been determined that the ongoing maintenance, servicing and operation of the District’s improvements provide no measurable general benefit to properties outside the District or to the public at large, but clearly provide distinct and special benefits to properties within the District.

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
All costs associated with the maintenance and operation of the Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District improvements including Engineer’s Report, printing and advertising of assessment notices and legal fees shall be spread to all parcels on a pro-rata development unit basis.

Chapter 6.4 of Division 2 of the California Government Code, the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of financing the operation, maintenance and servicing of drainage, flood control, street lighting, and street improvements, and installation and improvement of drainage and flood improvements.

Section 54711 of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 requires that assessments be levied according to benefit derived from the provided service. In addition, Article XIIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property.

Article XIIID provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Excepted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways, and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private commercial, industrial and institutional activities.

The improvements to be maintained and operated as a result of the formation of the Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District have been installed given that all of the residential units within the District have been built. All such improvements are being installed within or in areas in close proximity to the proposed developed residential lots and benefiting the proposed developed residential lots.

As a result of the foregoing, the developed residential lots will receive 100% of the special benefits of the operation and maintenance of drainage, flood control, street lighting and street improvements. These special benefits include enhanced neighborhood health and safety, and improved quality of life, generated when drainage, flood control and street improvements are in place, improved, operable, safe, clean and maintained. In short, maintenance and operation of the proposed improvements will provide beautification, protection of improved property, enhanced comfort and increase the desirability of the immediate surroundings of the residential units within the District. Due to the configuration and proximity of the proposed or existing improvements within the District in relation to the developed lots, and the nature of the benefits derived therefrom, lots in close proximity to the District will not enjoy special benefits described herein. Moreover, because of the location of the contemplated improvements either within, close to, or benefiting the District itself, there is no general benefit to properties outside the District or the community as a whole, or a general benefit that is so negligible, it cannot be calculated for purposes of assessment.

Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Cipriani Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3281 : Resolution No. 2025-39 Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
11 As such, all costs associated with the maintenance and operation of Cipriani Estates Assessment District improvements, including incidentals and appurtenances, shall be spread to all parcels within the District on a development unit basis.

Developed parcels are those parcels on which a final subdivision map has been filed, and which can obtain building permits as of the date of the final public hearing on assessment. Said parcels also abut or obtain primary access from a public street.

Costs associated with the maintenance of a storm drain and appurtenances along the rear of Lots 1 through 7 and the westerly side of lot 7, as described previously in this report, will be assessed solely on Lots 1 through 7. These lots receive storm drainage from the adjacent Fairview Estates Unit No. 2 subdivision, and the storm drain improvements as described, allow those lots to be developed. A separate budget line item is included in the budget solely for the benefit of those parcels.

In order to determine the appropriate assessment for each developed parcel, a budget for operation and maintenance costs associated with planned improvements in the entire Cipriani Estates Subdivision Project was prepared. The total cost of operation and maintenance of a given improvement must be collected on an annual basis. Since the developed parcels in the District are the only parcels that derive special benefit from such activities, they must bear the entire cost of operation and maintenance.

Factored development unit calculations for residential areas are as follows: Low Density Single Family Residential = 1.0 Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU).

Monterey County charges 0.25% of the levy amount for collection for administration of the District.

Assessments may be adjusted annually based on the April Consumer Price Index of the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Area All Urban Consumers Index (CPI-U). Adjustments are based on the change of the Consumer Price Index prior year/month as compared to the year/month assessments are determined (benchmark month for this district is April). The following table shows the prior year actual and maximum assessment rate per EDU, the annual CPI-U adjustment for the current fiscal year, the current year calculated maximum assessment, the assessment unit of measure, and the current year applied assessment rate.

Phase/Lots
Prior Year
Applied
Assessment Rate
Prior Year
Maximum
Assessment Rate
April to April %
adjustment in the
SF/Oak/Hay CPI-U
Current Year
Maximum
Assessment Rate
Current Year
Applied
Assessment Rate
Lots 1-7 $1,052.04 $1,548.87 1.270% $1,568.54 $1,052.04 Lots 8-66 & 70-74 $750.00 $966.05 1.270% $978.31 $678.00 Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Cipriani Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3281 : Resolution No. 2025-39 Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
12 APPENDIX A – FINANCIAL SUMMARY
2024-25 Financial Summary
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Cipriani Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3281 : Resolution No. 2025-39 Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
13 APPENDIX B – ASSESSMENT ROLL
Assessment Roll
The proposed assessment and the amount of the assessment apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the latest roll at the Assessor’s Office, is shown in Appendix A. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the Assessor of the County of Monterey and those records are, by reference, made part of this report. The assessments shown will be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller and included on the property tax bill for each parcel shown in the assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Cipriani Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3281 : Resolution No. 2025-39 Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
14 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County
Collection Fee Total Assessment
020-351-001-000 1 1.00 $1,049.42 $2.62 $1,052.04
020-351-002-000 2 1.00 $1,049.42 $2.62 $1,052.04
020-351-003-000 3 1.00 $1,049.42 $2.62 $1,052.04
020-351-004-000 4 1.00 $1,049.42 $2.62 $1,052.04
020-351-005-000 5 1.00 $1,049.42 $2.62 $1,052.04
020-351-006-000 6 1.00 $1,049.42 $2.62 $1,052.04
020-351-007-000 7 1.00 $1,049.42 $2.62 $1,052.04
020-351-008-000 8 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-009-000 9 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-010-000 10 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-011-000 11 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-012-000 12 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-013-000 13 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-014-000 14 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-015-000 15 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-016-000 16 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-017-000 17 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-018-000 18 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-019-000 19 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-020-000 20 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-021-000 21 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-022-000 22 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-023-000 23 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-024-000 24 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-025-000 25 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-026-000 26 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-027-000 27 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-028-000 28 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-029-000 29 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-030-000 30 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-031-000 31 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-032-000 32 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-033-000 33 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-034-000 34 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-035-000 35 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Cipriani Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3281 : Resolution No. 2025-39 Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
15 APN Phase EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County
Collection Fee Total Assessment
020-351-036-000 36 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-037-000 37 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-038-000 38 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-039-000 39 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-040-000 40 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-041-000 41 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-042-000 42 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-043-000 43 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-044-000 44 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-045-000 45 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-046-000 46 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-047-000 47 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-048-000 48 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-049-000 49 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-050-000 50 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-051-000 51 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-052-000 52 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-053-000 53 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-054-000 54 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-055-000 55 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-056-000 56 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-057-000 57 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-058-000 58 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-059-000 59 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-060-000 60 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-061-000 61 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-062-000 62 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-063-000 63 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-064-000 64 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-065-000 65 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-066-000 66 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-067-000 67 0.00 $676.30 $0.00 $0.00
020-351-068-000 68 0.00 $676.30 $0.00 $0.00
020-351-069-000 69 0.00 $676.30 $0.00 $0.00
020-351-070-000 70 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-071-000 71 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-072-000 72 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-073-000 73 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
020-351-074-000 74 1.00 $676.30 $1.69 $678.00
TOTALS 71.00 $50,756.28
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Cipriani Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3281 : Resolution No. 2025-39 Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
16 APPENDIX C – DISTRICT DIAGRAM
District Diagram The District Diagram is shown on the following page.

Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Cipriani Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3281 : Resolution No. 2025-39 Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District Intention to Engineer’s Report
Canyon Creek Benefit Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 17 Packet Pg. 279
Attachment: Cipriani Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3281 : Resolution No. 2025-39 Cipriani Estates Benefit Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 18 APPENDIX D – CAPITAL REPLACEMENT Capital Replacement The following pages show a summary of the Capital Replacement costs for each District within the City, as well as the Capital Replacement detail of each identified item for this District.

Packet Pg. 280
Attachment: Cipriani Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3281 : Resolution No. 2025-39 Cipriani Estates Benefit Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Benefit Assessment District City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 19 Packet Pg. 281
Attachment: Cipriani Benefit AD Report FY 25-26 (3281 : Resolution No. 2025-39 Cipriani Estates Benefit RESOLUTION NO. 2025-40

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GONZALES, PROVIDING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF ENGINEER’S REPORT, STATING

INTENTION TO CONFIRM DIAGRAM AND TO LEVY AND COLLECT ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972

CIPRIANI ESTATES PARKS AND OPEN SPACES

MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the Gonzales City Council (the “Council”) to confirm the diagram for and to levy and collect assessments in the Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District for the purpose of maintaining, operating and/or servicing of public lands and improvements for parks and open space purposes pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the “Act”), being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (commencing with Section 22500) and as provided by Article XIIID of the California Constitution; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, Harris & Associates, the designated Engineer of Work of the City of Gonzales (the “City”) has made and filed with the City Clerk an Engineer’s Report (the “Report”) called for under the Act; and
WHEREAS, said Council has given preliminary consideration to the Report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said Report is sufficient, and that neither said Report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect.

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Gonzales as follows:

1. With respect to the Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, the Council finds:
• That the plans and specifications in said Report be, and they are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed.
• That the Engineer’s actual itemized and total costs and expenses of said maintenance, operation and/or servicing of public lands and improvements and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed. • That the diagram showing the assessment district and the boundaries and dimensions of the respective subdivisions of land within said assessment district be, and are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. • That the proposed assessments upon the several subdivisions of land in said assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-40 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Diagrams) AGENDA
ITEM
20 subdivisions, respectively, from said maintenance, operation and/or servicing of public lands and improvements, and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report be, and they are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed.
• That the maps and descriptions of the lands and easements to be acquired, if any, contained in said report be, and the same are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed.
• That the proposed maximum annual assessments and assessments upon each of the several subdivisions of land in the assessment district to pay costs incurred by the City and not otherwise reimbursed which result from the administration and collection of assessments, as contained in said report be, and the same are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed.
• That said report is preliminarily approved and confirmed as a whole and shall stand as the Engineer’s Report for the purpose of all subsequent proceedings.

2. The Council hereby finds that the public interest and convenience requires, and as such declares its intention to levy and collect assessments against the assessable lots and parcels of land within the District referenced herein for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, all pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Article XIIID of the California Constitution.

3. The public improvements and lands to be maintained, operated and/or serviced are generally described in the Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2025-2026, incorporated herein by reference.

4. The involved assessment district is generally described as follows:

Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District- a district bounded on the southeast by Lands of Pacific Wine Partners, on the southwest by Centennial (“C”) Street, on the northwest by existing Tract No. 888, Volume 14, Cities and Towns, Page 23, Monterey County Records, and on the northeast by US Route 101.

5. Reference to the Engineer’s Report, on file with the City Clerk, is hereby made for a full and detailed description of public improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the assessment district.

6. It is ordered that Monday, July 21, 2025, at 6:00 p.m., in the regular meeting place of said Council, Council Chambers, 117 Fourth Street, Gonzales, California, is hereby appointed and fixed for the public hearing and time and place when and where the Council will consider and act upon the Engineer’s Report, confirm the District diagram, and the levy of the proposed assessment.

Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-40 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Diagrams)

7. The City Clerk is directed to give notice of the hearing by one publication of a copy of this Resolution in the local newspaper published and circulated in said City, pursuant to Section 6061 of the California Government Code.

8. The proposed assessments will remain the same as the assessments established for the District in Fiscal Year 2024-2025, $650. The District Maximum Assessment will be adjusted by the CPI, which has been set at 1.270%. The Maximum Assessment will be adjusted, as necessary, when the final CPI is obtained.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Gonzales duly held on the 2nd day of June, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Jose L. Rios, The Honorable Mayor
ATTEST:

I, the undersigned Deputy City Clerk, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted and passed by the City Council of the City of Gonzales, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2
nd day of June, 2025, by the above-stated vote of the members thereof, a majority being present.

Dated: June 2, 2025
Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-40 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Diagrams)

CITY OF GONZALES
PRELIMINARY ENGINEER’S REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

CIPRIANI ESTATES PARKS & OPEN SPACES
FUND #310
JULY 2025

PREPARED BY
Harris & Associates
60 W. Alisal Street, Suite 200
Salinas, CA 93901
www.weareharris.com
Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Cipriani POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26

CIPRIANI ESTATES PARKS AND OPEN SPACES
City of Gonzales
Monterey County
State of California

APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CIPRIANI ESTATES PARKS AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF GONZALES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON THE _____ DAY OF _________, 2025.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with me on the ________day of ______________, 2025.

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
City of Gonzales, Monterey County, CA
_________________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Gonzales, California on the ________day of ______________, 2025.

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
City of Gonzales, Monterey County, CA
__________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Monterey on the ________day of ______________, 2025.

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
City of Gonzales, Monterey County, CA
__________________________
Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Cipriani POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
Certifications…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………i Statement of Assessment Engineer…………………………………………………………………………………..….1 Plans and Specifications……………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Estimate of Costs………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….6 District Diagram…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...9 Method of Apportionment………………………………………………………………………………………………….10 Appendix A – 2024-25 Financial Summary ………………………………………………………………………….13 Appendix B – Assessment Roll ………………………………………………………………………………………..….14 Appendix C – District Diagram …………………………………………………………………………………………...16 Appendix D – Capital Replacement …………………………………………………………………………………….18 Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Cipriani POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
1 STATEMENT OF ENGINEER
Statement of Assessment Engineer
AGENCY: CITY OF GONZALES
PROJECT: Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces
TO: THE CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF GONZALES

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
The preparation of this Annual Engineer’s Report (“Report”) is in conformance with the obligation of the City Council for the Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Space District of the City of Gonzales to provide drainage services upon each lot or parcel of land in the district in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel of land for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (Part 2 Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 22500) (“Act”), Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the State of California Constitution, and in accordance with the City of Gonzales’ Resolution adopted by the City Council, this Report has been ordered for:

CIPRIANI ESTATES PARKS AND OPEN SPACES
(Hereinafter referred to as the “District”),
I, Alison Bouley, authorized representative of the District, the duly appointed Assessment Engineer submit the following Report which consists of the following four (4) parts and Appendices:

PART I
Description of Improvements: This part provides a general description of improvements proposed to be maintained in the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are on file with the City.

PART II
Estimate of Cost: This part contains the cost estimate of the proposed maintenance including incidental costs and expenses for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Cipriani POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
2 PART III
District Diagram: This part incorporates a Diagram of the District showing the external boundaries of the District. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Monterey County Assessor for the year in which this Report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. The District Diagram is filed under separate cover with the City Clerk.

PART IV
Method of Apportionment of the Assessments: This part describes the method of apportionment of assessments, based upon parcel classification of land within the District in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received. The costs and expenses of the District have been assessed upon the parcels of land within the boundaries of District pursuant to the initial methodology established by Resolution No. 2004-62 approved on the 21st day of June, 2004. For particulars as to the identification of parcels, reference is made to the District Diagram.

Appendices
Appendix A – Financial Summary
Appendix B – Assessment Roll
Appendix C – District Diagram
Appendix D – Capital Replacement
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed to the lots and parcels within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the services provided.

DATED this day of July, 2025
___________________________________________
Alison Bouley, P.E., Assessment Engineer
R.C.E. No. C61383
Engineer of Work
Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Cipriani POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

3 PART 1 – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Plans and Specifications

INTRODUCTION
City Staff has contracted with Harris & Associates (“Harris”) to complete the annual administration process for all of City’s assessment districts. In addition to this required annual process, Harris has conducted an assessment district fund balance and capital asset replacement cash flow analysis to confirm and ensure that the City’s assessment districts annually assess property owners only for the essential funding to complete ongoing maintenance activities and finance timely capital replacement as assets reach the end of their useable lifecycles.

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICTS
Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces Maintenance Assessment District is generally bounded on the southeast by Lands of Pacific Wine Partners, on the southwest by Centennial (“C”) Street, on the northwest by existing Tract No. 888, Volume 14, Cities and Towns, Page 23, Monterey County Records, and on the northeast by State Route 101. Refer to Appendix B.

The District was formed in 2004 to provide a dedicated funding source for the maintenance and operation of any or all public landscaping and irrigation improvements, of a local nature, on landscaped strips of land adjacent to curbs of the following described streets, including monument signs, planter walls, grass berms, retention ponds, parks or tot lots, boundary walls and bank protection, appurtenant irrigation systems; ornamental plantings including lawns, shrubs, and trees; including necessary repairs, replacements, water, electric current, spraying, care, supervision, debris removal, and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for the proper maintenance and operation thereof and all additions, improvements and enlargements thereto which may hereafter be made on the following described work:

Cipriani Street, located in a strip of land of varying width from face of curb lines including planter walls at its intersection with Centennial (“C”) Street.

Maintenance and operation of any or all public landscaping and irrigation improvements, of a local nature, on landscaped strips of land of the following described areas, including retention pond landscaping and bank protection, appurtenant irrigation systems; ornamental plantings including lawns, shrubs, and trees; including necessary repairs, replacements, water, electric current, spraying, care, supervision, debris removal, and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for the proper maintenance and operation thereof and all additions, improvements and enlargements thereto which may hereafter be made on the following described work:

Storm Water Retention Pond and appurtenant access and irrigation as said parcel as shown on the map filed in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Gonzales titled, “Cipriani Estates PUD Tentative Map Moreland Corporation”.

Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Cipriani POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

4 Maintenance and operation of planter walls and associated improvements, of a local nature, including necessary repairs, replacements, spraying, care, supervision, debris removal, and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for the proper maintenance and operation thereof and all additions, improvements and enlargements thereto which may hereafter be made on the following described work:

Boundary Walls, including landscaping appurtenant thereto along the boundary of the project and tot lot/park, as shown on that certain map titled, “Cipriani Estates PUD Tentative Map Moreland Corporation”.

Maintenance and operation of any or all public landscaping and irrigation improvements, of a local nature, on landscaped land adjacent including jogging paths, planter walls, grass berms, appurtenant irrigation systems; ornamental plantings including lawns, shrubs, and trees; park liability insurance coverage, including necessary repairs, replacements, water, electric current, spraying, care, supervision, debris removal, and any and all other items of work necessary and incidental for the proper maintenance and operation thereof and all additions, improvements and enlargements thereto which may hereafter be made on the following described work:

Tot Lot/Park Site, as shown on that certain map titled, “Cipriani Estates PUD Tentative Map Moreland Corporation”, a.k.a. “Lots 67 through 69”, until said lots are developed for residential uses.

Incidental costs including contingencies, and Assessment District incidentals including engineering, printing, and notices to property owners, collection costs, legal fees, administration and supervision, are assessed to the District on the same basis as the improvements specified above.

COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
Assessments are levied annually pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (“1972 Act”). All assessments described in this Report and approved by the City Council are prepared in accordance with the 1972 Act and are in compliance with the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIIID (“Article XIIID”), which was enacted with the passage of Proposition 218 (“Prop 218”) in November 1996.

SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AND EXPENDITURES
A summary of the assessments to be levied is shown in the table below.

Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Cipriani POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
5 LEVEL OF MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROVIDED
All costs associated with the maintenance and operation of the District improvements including the Engineer’s Report, printing and advertising of assessment notices, County collection fees and legal fees all of which shall be spread to all parcels on a pro-rata development unit basis.

One hundred percent (100%) of all costs associated with the maintenance and operation of the District improvements including incidentals and appurtenances are of special benefit to parcels within the District and shall be spread to all parcels within the District on a development unit basis.

Pursuant to the 1972 Act:
"Maintain" or "maintenance" means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement.
"Service" or "servicing" means the furnishing of electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other improvements.

Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Cipriani POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
6 PART II – ESTIMATE OF COSTS
Estimate of Costs
All improvements within the District are maintained and serviced on a regular basis. Based upon the available revenues generated by the assessment, City staff determines the frequency and specific maintenance operations which can be provided in a given year.

The proposed budget is shown on the following page. This includes an estimate of the costs of utilities, operations, services, administration and maintenance associated with the improvements within the District, including all labor, personnel, equipment, materials and administrative expenses. The budget summary also shows the estimated fund balance and the projected fund reserves that will be available and may be required based upon the estimated expenditures and assessment revenue.

Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Cipriani POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

7 Annual Budget

EXPENDITURES
Maintenance and Servicing
Park 1
$7,364
Percolation Pond Landscape Maintenance $4,419
Sound Wall Maintenance $621
Maintenance and Servicing Subtotal $12,403
Utilities
Street Landscaping Water Charges $19,500
Park Water Charges $13,200
Park Electrical Charges $4,858
Utilities Subtotal $37,558
Capital Replacement/Repair Collection 2
Tot Lot Play Structures Replacement $5,000
Sound Wall Surface 3
$14,000
Capital Replacement/Repair Subtotal $19,000
Capital Outlay $0
District Administration
City Staff (YE Transfers GF) $10,200
Engineering (Surveys & Assessment) $1,500
City Administration $3,500
Legal Counsel $1,000
Legal and Accounting Services $0
Supplies, Printing and Advertising $69
Other Contractual Services $20,000
County Collection Fee $115
Contingency $3,448
District Administration Subtotal $39,832
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $108,793

REVENUES & ADJUSTMENTS
Actual/Estimated Assessments $46,150
Actual/Estimated Use of Money and Property $11,066
Transfer (To)/From Fund Balance $51,577
TOTAL REVENUES & ADJUSTMENTS $108,793
OPERATING FUND BALANCE 4
Estimated Balance 7/1/2025 $54,397
Estimated Addition/(Reduction) $0
Estimated Interest Income $2,176
Estimated Balance 6/30/2026 $56,573

CAPITAL RESERVE FUND BALANCE
Estimated Balance 7/1/2025 $222,250
Estimated Addition/(Reduction) ($51,577)
Estimated Interest Income $8,890
Estimated Balance 6/30/2026 $179,563

ANNUAL LEVY SUMMARY
Total SFR Parcels Levied 71
Total SFR EDUs 71.00
Maximum Assessment per EDU $720.69
Assessment per EDU $650.00
Assessment Needed to Fully Fund $1,532.30
Definitions: SFR = Single Family Residential Parcel(s); EDU = Equivalent Dwelling Unit Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Cipriani POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

8 Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Cipriani POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

9 PART III – DISTRICT DIAGRAM
District Diagram
The boundaries of the Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Space District are shown on the map in Appendix C. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions as shown on the maps of the Monterey County Assessor for the year in which this Report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. The District Diagram is also filed under separate cover with the City Clerk.

Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Cipriani POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
10 PART IV – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
Method of Apportionment

GENERAL PROVISIONS
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the construction, maintenance and servicing of public lights, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value:
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.” The formula used for calculating assessments in the District therefore reflects the composition of the parcels, and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on estimated benefit to each parcel. In addition, pursuant to Prop 218:
“No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Only special benefits are assessable and an agency shall separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel.”

BENEFIT ANALYSIS
Each of the improvements have been carefully reviewed by the City and the corresponding assessments have been proportionately spread to each parcel based on improvements as determined at the time the District was established.

General Benefits
The improvements within this District are a direct result of property development within the District and would otherwise not be required or necessary. Developers typically install landscape improvements to enhance the marketability and value of properties within the development and/or as conditions of development. In either case, the improvements are clearly installed for the benefit of the properties developed and not for the benefit of surrounding properties.

Although many landscape improvements (by virtue of their location), may be visible to surrounding properties or to the public at large, any benefit to surrounding properties is incidental and cannot be considered a direct and special benefit to those properties. Therefore, it has been determined that the improvements within this District and the ongoing operation and maintenance of those improvements are clearly a direct and special benefit to properties within the District.

Unless otherwise noted, these improvements provide no measurable general benefit to properties outside the District or to the public at large.

Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Cipriani POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

11 Special Benefits
The method of apportionment approved at the time the District was formed is based on the premise that each of the assessed parcels within the District receives benefit from the improvements maintained and financed by annual assessments. Specifically, the assessments are for the maintenance of local landscape improvements installed as part of the original improvement. The desirability and safety of properties within the District are enhanced by the presence of well-maintained landscaping. The special benefits associated with the local landscaping improvements are specifically:
• Enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements. • Improved aesthetic appeal of properties within the District providing a positive representation of the area.
• Enhanced adaptation of the urban environment within the natural environment from adequate green space and landscaping.
• Increased sense of pride in ownership of property within the District resulting from well-maintained improvements associated with the properties.

All of the preceding special benefits contribute to a specific enhancement and desirability for the parcels in the District.

Non-Assessable Parcels
Article XIIID provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment.

Excepted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways, and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to private commercial, industrial and institutional activities.

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The District is assessed, on the basis of total development units generated, for the maintenance and operation of the District improvements, including incidentals and appurtenances, and shall include all the costs of maintaining and/or operating the improvements described herein.

All costs associated with the maintenance and operation of the District improvements including Engineer’s Report, printing and advertising of assessment notices and legal fees shall be spread to all parcels on a pro-rata development unit basis.

Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of Assessment Districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping, street lighting, and park and recreational facilities. Section 22573 of the Lighting and Landscaping Act of 1972 requires that maintenance assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. In addition, Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property.

Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Cipriani POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
12 The improvements to be maintained and operated as a result of the formation of the District have been installed given that all of the residential units within the District have been built. All of the involved improvements have been installed within or in areas in close proximity to the developed residential lots.

The developed residential lots in the Cipriani Estates subdivision will receive all of the special benefits of the operation and maintenance of parks, public landscaping and streetlights. These special benefits include enhanced neighborhood identity and quality of life, generated when park landscaping and lighting are in place, improved, operable, safe, clean and maintained. In short, maintenance and operation of the proposed improvements will provide beautification, shade, and increase the desirability of the immediate surroundings of the residential units within the District.

Because of the location of the contemplated improvements either within or close to the District itself, there is no general benefit to properties outside the District or the community as a whole, or a general benefit that is so negligible; it cannot be calculated for purposes of assessment.

As such, all costs associated with the maintenance and operation of District improvements, including incidentals and appurtenances, shall be spread to all parcels within the District on a development unit basis. Developed parcels are those parcels on which a final subdivision map has been filed, as of the date of the final public hearing on assessment. Said parcels also abut or obtain primary access from a public street.

In order to determine the appropriate assessment for each developed parcel, a budget for operation and maintenance costs associated with planned improvements in the entire Cipriani Estates was prepared. In some instances, the total cost of operation and maintenance of a given improvement must be collected on an annual basis. Since the developed parcels in the District are the only parcels that derive special benefit from such activities, they must bear the entire cost of operation and maintenance.

Factored development unit calculations for residential areas are as follows: Low Density Single Family Residential = 1.0 Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU).

Monterey County charges 0.25% of the levy amount for collection for administration of the District.

Assessments may be adjusted annually based on the April Consumer Price Index of the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Area All Urban Consumers Index (CPI-U). Adjustments are based on the change of the Consumer Price Index prior year/month as compared to the year/month assessments are determined (benchmark month for this district is April). The following table shows the prior year actual and maximum assessment rate per EDU, the annual CPI-U adjustment for the current fiscal year, the current year calculated maximum assessment, the assessment unit of measure, and the current year applied assessment rate.

Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Cipriani POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
13 APPENDIX A – FINANCIAL SUMMARY
2024-25 Financial Summary
Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Cipriani POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
14 APPENDIX B – ASSESSMENT ROLL
Assessment Roll
The proposed assessment and the amount of the assessment apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the latest roll at the Assessor’s Office, is shown in Appendix A. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the Assessor of the County of Monterey and those records are, by reference, made part of this report. The assessments shown will be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller and included on the property tax bill for each parcel shown in the assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Cipriani POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
15 APN
Asmt/
Lot No. EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County
Collection Fee Total Assessment
020-351-001-000 1 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-002-000 2 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-003-000 3 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-004-000 4 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-005-000 5 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-006-000 6 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-007-000 7 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-008-000 8 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-009-000 9 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-010-000 10 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-011-000 11 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-012-000 12 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-013-000 13 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-014-000 14 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-015-000 15 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-016-000 16 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-017-000 17 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-018-000 18 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-019-000 19 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-020-000 20 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-021-000 21 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-022-000 22 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-023-000 23 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-024-000 24 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-025-000 25 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-026-000 26 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-027-000 27 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-028-000 28 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-029-000 29 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-030-000 30 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-031-000 31 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-032-000 32 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-033-000 33 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-034-000 34 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-035-000 35 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Cipriani POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26

16 APN
Asmt/
Lot No. EDU
Base
Assessment
Rate
County
Collection Fee Total Assessment
020-351-036-000 36 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-037-000 37 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-038-000 38 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-039-000 39 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-040-000 40 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-041-000 41 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-042-000 42 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-043-000 43 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-044-000 44 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-045-000 45 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-046-000 46 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-047-000 47 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-048-000 48 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-049-000 49 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-050-000 50 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-051-000 51 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-052-000 52 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-053-000 53 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-054-000 54 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-055-000 55 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-056-000 56 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-057-000 57 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-058-000 58 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-059-000 59 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-060-000 60 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-061-000 61 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-062-000 62 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-063-000 63 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-064-000 64 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-065-000 65 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-066-000 66 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-067-000 67 0.00 $648.38 $0.00 $0.00
020-351-068-000 68 0.00 $648.38 $0.00 $0.00
020-351-069-000 69 0.00 $648.38 $0.00 $0.00
020-351-070-000 70 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-071-000 71 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-072-000 72 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-073-000 73 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
020-351-074-000 74 1.00 $648.38 $1.62 $650.00
TOTALS 71.00 $46,150.00
Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Cipriani POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 17 APPENDIX C – DISTRICT DIAGRAM District Diagram
The District Diagram is shown on the following page.

Packet Pg. 304
Attachment: Cipriani POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces City of Gonzales Fiscal Year 2025-26 18 Packet Pg. 305
Attachment: Cipriani POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
19 APPENDIX D – CAPITAL REPLACEMENT
Capital Replacement
The following pages show a summary of the Capital Replacement costs for each District within the City, as well as the Capital Replacement detail of each identified item for this District.

Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Cipriani POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm Engineer’s Report
Cipriani Estates Parks and Open Spaces
City of Gonzales
Fiscal Year 2025-26
20 Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Cipriani POS AD Report FY 25-26 (3282 : Resolution No. 2025-40 Cipriani Estates P&OS Assessment District Intention to Confirm City of Gonzales

PUBLIC WORKS / CITY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT

STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor Rios and City Council
DATE: June 2, 2025
FROM: Patrick Dobbins, Public Works Director/City Engineer THROUGH: Carmen Gil, City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 2025-28 Establishing the FY 2025-2026 Cost of Services Fee Schedule

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council approve Resolution No. 2025-28, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Establishing the Cost for Services Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2025-2026.

BACKGROUND
Gonzales City Code 1.44.020 “General Fee Schedule Established” states “The City Council shall by resolution adopt and may by resolution from time to time amend, a schedule of fees and charges applicable to City services and functions not otherwise specifically provided for in this code. Said schedule shall be known and designated as the General Fee Schedule of the city.” Every year, staff present an updated Cost for Services Fee Schedule to the City Council for inclusion in the proposed budget for the upcoming fiscal year beginning July 1st. Staff proposes fees that are legal, applicable, cost effective, and cover the expected cost for city provided services. The adoption is publicly noticed as evidenced by the attached legal notice.

AGENDA
ITEM
21 Packet Pg. 308

REVIEW AND ANALYSIS
Staff performed a comprehensive review of the various city fees for this update. Staff collected the current fee schedules for the cities of Soledad, Greenfield and King and reviewed their fees to ensure our fees were in line with neighboring cities. And all departments were asked to review their respective fees and some adjustments were made, such as:

1. Building and Planning fees were cross checked with rates from 4Leaf to ensure that the City is receiving cost recovery.

2. Recreation fees were revised to support cost recovery and to be more in line with surrounding cities.

3. Mitigation Rates for the Fire Department Emergency Response were updated to reflect the rates approved at the March 17th City Council Meeting.

The proposed fees were increased by the Bureau of Labor Statistics Price Index (CPI) as of February 2025. This year, the index is 2.7% as shown on the attached document from the State’s website. This is the same index used each year. On January 1, 2026, water and wastewater fees will increase per Resolution No. 2023-67.

For the impact fees, pursuant to Gonzales City Code Section 1.48.050 C1: the appropriate index to use is the Engineering-New Record Construction Cost Index from December of the prior year, which would result in an adjustment of 2.9% as shown in Attachment 2.

Solid Waste collection fees are established by the Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority (SVSWA) and Tri-Cities Disposal (franchise hauler). Tri-Cities’ rates are changing under a new franchise agreement that is going before Council on June 16, 2025. SVSWA pass-through fees include a 5.15% increase to its organics processing fee, along with its annual AB939 fee adjustment which resulted in a 11.96% increase.

Attachments to this staff report are the adopting resolution, the proposed fees for Fiscal Year 2025-26, with any increases in bold, the Consumer Price Index increases, the Construction Cost Index for the impact fee increases and the explanation of the fees including current and proposed fees. This item is a Public Hearing and the published Public Notice is also attached (Attachment 3).

Explain Recommendation and How it Supports the Vision
Gonzales will continue to be a safe, clean, family-friendly community, diverse in its heritage, and committed to working collaboratively to preserve and retain its small-town charm.

Explain: Collecting appropriate fees provides the needed resources to maintain and improve Gonzales’ safe, clean, and family-friendly community.

Explain how the Recommendation Directly Implements the Mission The City Council and Staff of the City of Gonzales will realize our Vision by providing the leadership, commitment, and resources necessary to provide excellent services that enhance the quality of life of our diverse community.
1 “Annual Adjustment of Fees: Notwithstanding substantive adjustment of impact fees based on reconsideration or updated analyses of those matters set forth in subsection A of this section, the fees established in subsection B of this section shall be adjusted every year on July 1, commencing July 1, 2007, to reflect the annual percentage change in the construction cost index for San Francisco as of December 1 of the previous year as reported in the ‘Engineering News-Record’.”
Packet Pg. 309
Explain: The attached fee schedule provides only the needed resources for continued excellent services. Fees do not provide the full cost of services but try to recover reasonable fees.

City services will be delivered in a cost-effective, respectful, and friendly manner to ensure the safety and wellbeing of the residents and the promotion of business, recreational, housing and employment opportunities in an environmentally sustainable manner.

Explain: Using this updated fee schedule is a cost-effective way to provide services and recover reasonable costs for those services.

Strong fiscal policies allow us to provide appropriate infrastructure for:
• Public Safety X Yes No N/A
• Housing X Yes No N/A
• Recreation X Yes No N/A
• Environment X Yes No N/A
• Education Yes No X N/A
Explain: Service and impact fees allow services to continue and improve. Keeping cost of living increases reasonable allows Gonzales to be more sustainable.

ALTERNATIVES
The City Council could direct staff to modify the recommended fees or leave fees at last year’s values.

Staff recommends against this option to keep fees and costs aligned as much as possible to avoid the need for future larger increases.

BUDGET IMPACT
The recommended fees are incorporated into the proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

CONCLUSION
Staff recommends the City Council approve Resolution No. 2025-28, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gonzales Establishing the Cost for Services Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Attachments:

1. Resolution No. 2025-28

2. Fee Schedule FY 2025-2026

3. ENR as of Dec 2024

4. Public Hearing Notice
Packet Pg. 310
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-28

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

GONZALES ESTABLISHING THE COST FOR SERVICES FEE
SCHEDULE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
WHEREAS, the City of Gonzales operates as a general law City incorporated in 1947, and adopts and follows the City Code; and
WHEREAS, Gonzales City Code Section 1.44.020 states “The City Council shall by resolution adopt, and may by resolution from time to time amend, a schedule of fees and charges applicable to city services and functions not otherwise specifically provided for in this code.”; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted in various provisions of the Gonzales City Code, specifically in Section 1.44.020, the City Council of the City of Gonzales wishes to set the fees and rates to be charged for services provided by the City during Fiscal Year 2025-2026, and the City Council has determined that the various fees should be established to reflect the actual cost of providing services, and all fees, rates, and charges should be incorporated into the General Fee Schedule; and WHEREAS, Sections 10.04.090, 10.04.110, and 10.16.090 of the Gonzales City Code direct the City to set water and sewer rates and charges, and the City has established such fees by this resolution of the City Council; and WHEREAS, City water and wastewater rates will increase as previously authorized under Resolution No. 2023-67 effective January 1, 2026; and WHEREAS, the Engineering-New Record Construction Cost Index for December 2024 indicates an increase of 2.9% for use in adjusting city impact fees; and WHEREAS, Solid Waste rates will be adjusted under a new franchise agreement with Tri-Cities Disposal that will be presented at the Council’s June 16, 2025 meeting for approval. Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority’s pass-through fees include a 5.15% increase to its organics processing fee, along with an AB939 fee adjustment which results in a 11.96% increase; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on June 2, 2025, to consider the proposed Cost for Service Fee Schedule, to include the establishment of new fees and adjustments in fees, including water and wastewater rates, impact fees, and will accept public testimony prior to taking action on the amendment to or addition of any fee contained therein; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that all fee adjustments or new fees are directly related to the cost of providing the specific services indicated for the City of Gonzales, and no property-based fees are included therein; and Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-28 (3267 : Resolution No. 2025-28 FY 2025-2026 Cost of Services Fee Schedule) WHEREAS, the City Council finds that in instances in which the Fee Schedule calls for the deposit of funds from which the City will subtract its service costs, that the only deductions made from such deposits will reflect the actual cost to the City, or its consultants, in providing the identified service.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Gonzales as follows:

1. All of the recitals set forth above are true and correct to the best of its knowledge, and by this reference, are incorporated herein as findings.

2. The attached Cost for Services Fee Schedule, as set forth in the document hereunto attached and by reference made a part hereof, is adopted for Fiscal Year 2025-26, beginning July 1, 2025.

3. The fees, rates and charges established for Fiscal Year 2024-25, by Resolution No. 2024-27, are hereby rescinded effective June 30, 2025.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Gonzales at a regular meeting duly held on the 2nd day of June 2025 by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Jose Rios, The Honorable Mayor
ATTEST:

Mary Villegas, Deputy City Clerk
Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Resolution No. 2025-28 (3267 : Resolution No. 2025-28 FY 2025-2026 Cost of Services Fee Schedule)

CITY OF GONZALES
Master Fee Schedule
Fiscal Year 2025 - 2026
Adopted:

Effective: July 1, 2025
Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Fee Schedule FY 2025-2026 (3267 : Resolution No. 2025-28 FY 2025-2026 Cost of Services

DESCRIPTION OF FEES PAGE NUMBER
ADMINISTRATION 3
BUILDING DIVISION 4
BUSINESS LICENSES 7
CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 7
FIRE DEPARTMENT 8
IMPACT MITIGATION FEES 9
LABOR CAMP 10
PLANNING DEPARTMENT 10
POLICE DEPARTMENT 13
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 15
RECREATION 16
UTILITIES 23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page 2 of 29 ends
← All documents from this meeting