Grand Terrace City Council
January 13, 2026

Tuesday, January 13, 2026 1

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
City Council
AGENDA ● January 13, 2026
Council Chambers Regular Meeting 6:00 PM
Grand Terrace Civic Center ● 22795 Barton Road

COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC
The public is encouraged to address the City Council on any matter posted on the agenda or on any other matter within its jurisdiction. If you wish to address the City Council, please complete a Request to Speak card located at the front entrance and provide it to the City Clerk. Speakers will be called upon by the Mayor at the appropriate time and each person is allowed three (3) minutes speaking time.

The City wants you to know that you can also submit your comments by email to [email protected]. To give the City Clerk adequate time to print out your comments for consideration at the meeting, please submit your written comments prior to 5:00 p.m.; or if you are unable to email, please call the City Clerk’s Office at (909) 954-5207 by 5:00 p.m.

If you wish to have your comments read to the City Council during the appropriate Public Comment period, please indicate in the Subject Line “FOR PUBLIC COMMENT” and list the item number you wish to comment on. Comments that you want read to the City Council will be subject to the three (3) minute time limitation (approximately 350 words).

Pursuant to the provisions of the Brown Act, no action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The City Council may direct staff to investigate and/or schedule certain matters for consideration at a future City Council meeting.

PLEASE NOTE: Copies of staff reports and supporting documentation pertaining to each item on this agenda are available for public viewing and inspection at City Hall, 1st Floor Lobby Area and 2nd Floor Reception Area during regular business hours and on the City’s website www.grandterraceca.gov. For further information regarding agenda items, please contact the office of the City Clerk at (909) 954-5207, or via e-mail at [email protected].

Any documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s office at City Hall located at 22795 Barton Road during normal business hours. In addition, such documents will be posted on the City’s website at www.grandterrace-ca.gov.

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office, (909) 954-5207 at least 48 hours prior to the advertised starting time of the meeting. This will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. Later requests will be accommodated to the extent feasible [28 CFR 34.102.104 ADA Title II].

Tuesday, January 13, 2026 2

CALL TO ORDER

INVOCATION

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
AB 2449 DISCLOSURES
Remote participation by a member of the legislative body for just cause or emergency circumstances.

ROLL CALL
A. REORDERING OF, ADDITIONS TO, OR REMOVAL OF ITEMS FROM THE AGENDA B. PUBLIC COMMENT
This is the opportunity for members of the public to comment on any items not appearing on the regular agenda. Because of restrictions contained in California Law, the City Council may not discuss or act on any item not on the agenda, but may briefly respond to statements made or ask a question for clarification. The Mayor may also request a brief response from staff to questions raised during public comment or may request a matter be agendized for a future meeting.

C. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS - NONE
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the City Council at one time without discussion. Any Council Member, Staff Member, or Citizen may request removal of an item from the Consent calendar for discussion.
1) Waive Full Reading of, and Direct the City Attorney to Read by Title only for, Ordinances on the Agenda
DEPARTMENT: City Clerk
2) Approval of Minutes - Regular Meeting - December 9, 2025 DEPARTMENT: City Clerk
3) AB 1600 Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2023–24 and Five-Year Findings for FY 2019–20 through FY 2023–24
RECOMMENDATION: RECEIVE AND FILE THE AB 1600 ANNUAL REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023–24 AND THE FIVE-YEAR FINDINGS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2019– 20 THROUGH 2023–24, PREPARED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 66006 AND 66001(D)
DEPARTMENT: Planning & Development Services

Tuesday, January 13, 2026 3
4) Award of Professional Services Agreement with Willdan for Gateway Specific Plan Engineering and Project Management Services
RECOMMENDATION: AWARD A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT TO WILLDAN IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $394,772 FOR ENGINEERING AND

PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES RELATED TO THE GATEWAY SPECIFIC PLAN, PHASE 1, FOR A THREE-YEAR TERM WITH TWO OPTIONAL ONE-YEAR EXTENSIONS; AND

AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT AND ANY SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS UP TO TEN PERCENT (10%) OF THE CONTRACT

AMOUNT, SUBJECT TO CITY ATTORNEY APPROVAL AS TO FORM
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
5) Approve Check #83091 to Mayor Hussey in the amount of $359.85 from the November 2025 Check Register
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE CHECK #83091 TO MAYOR HUSSEY IN THE AMOUNT OF $359.85 FROM THE NOVEMBER 2025 CHECK REGISTER DEPARTMENT: Finance
6) Approval of the November-2025 Check Register in the Amount of $321,113.76.

RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE THE CHECK REGISTER NO. 11302025 IN THE AMOUNT OF $321,113.76 AS SUBMITTED, FOR THE MONTH ENDING NOVEMBER 30, 2025
DEPARTMENT: Finance
E. PUBLIC HEARINGS
7) Adoption of the 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Nexus Study, Updated Development Impact Fees, and Introduction of an Ordinance Amending Section 4.80.010 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code
RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2025–26

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE (DIF) NEXUS STUDY AND ESTABLISHING UPDATED

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES AT OR BELOW THE MAXIMUM AMOUNTS

JUSTIFIED IN THE STUDY, INCLUDING A NEW LAW ENFORCEMENT (COUNTY SHERIFF) FACILITIES FEE COMPONENT; AND

INTRODUCE AND WAIVE THE FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 4.80.010 OF THE GRAND TERRACE MUNICIPAL CODE TO REMOVE

OBSOLETE FEE AMOUNTS AND PROVIDE THAT DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULES UNDER CHAPTER 4.80 SHALL BE ESTABLISHED BY CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION
DEPARTMENT: Planning & Development Services

Tuesday, January 13, 2026 4
F. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - NONE
G. NEW BUSINESS - NONE
H. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
At this time, the City Council may propose items for discussion and/or action at a future duly agendized City Council meeting. A consensus of a majority of the quorum is required to place an item on a future agenda.

I. CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Council Member Matt Brown
Council Member Jeff Allen
Council Member Doug Wilson
Mayor Pro Tem Michelle Sabino
Mayor Bill Hussey
J. CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
K. CLOSED SESSION - NONE
L. ADJOURN
The next Regular City Council Meeting will be held on January 27, 2026, at 6:00 PM. Any request to have an item placed on a future agenda must be made in writing and submitted to the City Clerk’s office.

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
City Council
MINUTES ● December 9, 2025
Council Chambers Regular Meeting 6:00 PM
Grand Terrace Civic Center ● 22795 Barton Road
Call to Order
Mayor Bill Hussey convened the Regular Meeting of the City Council for Tuesday, December 9, 2025 at 6:00 PM.

Invocation
The Invocation was given by Pastor Linda Biswas from Azure Hills Seventh Day Adventist Church.

Pledge of Allegiance
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Pro Tem Michelle Sabino.

AB 2449 Disclosures
None.

Roll Call

Present: Mayor Bill Hussey
Mayor Pro Tem Michelle Sabino
Council Member Doug Wilson
Council Member Jeff Allen
Council Member Matt Brown

Absent:

A. REORDERING OF, ADDITIONS TO, OR REMOVAL OF ITEMS FROM THE AGENDA
None.

B. PUBLIC COMMENT
Johan Gallo, Grand Terrace Resident, thanked the City Council for always being supportive, as well as the Sheriff and Fire Department for all of their assistance during the toy drive cruise.

Molly Widdicombe, Girls on the Run Inland Empire, wanted to thank the Council for their generosity and continuous support, Molly also provided an update and what they are currently working on.

C. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS - NONE
D. CONSENT CALENDAR

NO PUBLIC COMMENT
COUNCIL MEMBER MATT BROWN PULLED ITEMS NOS. 5 AND 6 FOR DISCUSSION.

MAYOR HUSSEY RECUSED HIMSELF ON ITEM NO. 4
COUNCIL MEMBER JEFF ALLEN MOTIONED TO APPROVE ITEM NOS. 1–4 AND 7 ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR, FOLLOWED BY A SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM SABINO.

RESULT: APPROVED - UNANIMOUS
MOVER: Council Member Allen
SECONDER: Mayor Pro Tem Sabino
AYES: Mayor Hussey, Mayor Pro Tem Sabino, Council Member Wilson, Council Member Allen, Council Member Brown
NAYS: None
1) Waive Full Reading of, and Direct the City Attorney to Read by Title only for, Ordinances on the Agenda
2) Approval of Minutes - Special Meeting - November 12, 2025 3) Approval of the October-2025 Check Register in the Amount of $826,011.57. 4) Approve Check #83007 to Mayor Hussey in the amount of $359.85 from October 2025 Check Register
5) Budget Adjustment for a Public Works Director

MAYOR HUSSEY DIRECTED STAFF TO BRING THIS ITEM BACK AT A FUTURE MEETING FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION.
6) Retitling of Department Director Positions

COUNCIL MEMBER WILSON MOTIONED WITH A SECOND FROM MAYOR HUSSEY TO BRING THIS ITEM BACK AT A FUTURE MEETING.

RESULT: APPROVED 3 TO 1
MOVER: Council Member Wilson
SECONDER: Mayor Hussey
AYES: Mayor Hussey, Council Member Wilson, Council Member Allen ABSTAIN: Mayor Pro Tem Michelle Sabino
NAYS: Council Member Brown

7) Acceptance of the Capital Improvement Project (CIP 2025-26) E. PUBLIC HEARINGS - NONE
F. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - NONE
G. NEW BUSINESS - NONE
H. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
None.

I. CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Council Member Matt Brown reported on the following:
• Nothing to Report
Council Member Jeff Allen reported on the following:
• Attended the UCR 10-year Anniversary School of Public Policy seminar on December 5, 2025
• Attended Senator Rosilicie Ochoa-Bogh's Christmas open house on December 1, 2025
Council Member Doug Wilson reported on the following:
• Nothing to Report
Mayor Pro Tem Michelle Sabino reported on the following:
• Nothing to Report
Mayor Bill Hussey reported on the following:
• Announced that on Thursday, December 11, 2025, Santa Claus will be at Grand Terrace High School
• Attended the Light up Grand Terrace event and reported that it was a great evening. He also thanked cars & coffee and the Fire Department • Attended the League of Cities Leadership Committee on December 3, 2025, in Palm Desert, he also reported that he is now the League of Cities Division President of the Inland Empire

J. CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
Konrad Bolowich, City Manager, announced the following:
• Thanked staff, Rene Walker, Grand Terrace resident and the community for their participation and assistance with Light up Grand Terrace • The Senior Center will have a Christmas Lunch on Friday, December 12, 2025 • The Senior Center will be closed during the holidays beginning December 19, 2025 at noon and will reopen on January 5, 2026
• City Hall will be closed during the holidays beginning December 22, 2025, and will reopen on January 5, 2026 during regular business hours • Announced that there will be (4) Acting City Managers during the time that Konrad is out on vacation
• Encouraged residents to vaccinate and license their dogs • Vehicle citations will continue during the holidays

SHERIFF DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS
Lieutenant Fries reported on the following:
• Provided an incident detail report which will also be located on the city website

FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS
Assistant Fire Chief Jager reported on the following:
• Nothing to Report
K. CLOSED SESSION - NONE

RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
Mayor Hussey recessed the Regular Meeting of the City Council to closed session at 7:45 p.m.

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Gov. Code Section 54956.9
Case Name: Community Housing Group LLC et al. v. The City of Grand Terrace et al.

Case Number: CIVSB2527185

RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION
Mayor Hussey reconvened the Regular Meeting of the City Council from closed session at 8:05 p.m.

REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION
Adrian Guerra, City Attorney, announced that there was one (1) closed session item.

An update was provided by the City Attorney, discussion was had and direction was provided to the City Attorney. However, there was no reportable action.

L. ADJOURN
Mayor Hussey adjourned the Regular Meeting of the City Council at 8:06 p.m. The next Regular City Council Meeting will be held on Tuesday, January 13, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. _______________________________ _______________________________ Bill Hussey, Mayor Daysi Alcocer, City Clerk

AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: January 13, 2026
TITLE: AB 1600 Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2023–24 and Five-Year Findings for FY 2019–20 through FY 2023–24
PRESENTED BY: Gregory Brown, Vice President
RECOMMENDATION: RECEIVE AND FILE THE AB 1600 ANNUAL REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023–24 AND THE FIVE-YEAR FINDINGS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2019–20 THROUGH 2023–24, PREPARED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTIONS 66006 AND 66001(D)
2030 VISION STATEMENT:

This item supports the City’s vision of maintaining long-term fiscal responsibility and transparency by providing clear annual accounting of development impact fee revenue, expenditures, project progress, and long-term capital planning consistent with State law.

BACKGROUND:

The Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code Sections 66000–66025) establishes annual reporting requirements for each development impact fee (DIF) fund maintained by the City. Under Government Code Section 66006(b), the City must prepare an Annual Report summarizing, for each DIF fund:
- Beginning and ending fund balances
- Fee revenues received
- Interest earned
- Identified expenditures
- A description of each capital project funded
- The portion of each improvement funded with DIF revenue In addition, Government Code Section 66001(d) requires the City to make Five-Year Findings when unspent or uncommitted DIF balances have been held for more than five years. These findings must:

1. Re-state the purpose of the fee;

2. Demonstrate the continued need for the unexpended funds;

3. Identify the nexus between the fee and the improvements to be constructed; and

4. Provide the approximate timeline for expenditure.

The City prepared the combined AB 1600 Annual Report and Five-Year Findings for all DIF funds for FY 2019–20 through FY 2023–24. This document satisfies both annual reporting requirements under Section 66006 and the longer-term findings required by Section 66001(d).

DISCUSSION:

The AB 1600 Annual & Five-Year Report provides a comprehensive summary of the City’s DIF activity over the five-year period, including:
- Annual beginning/ending balances
- Revenues and expenditures

- Interest earnings
- Project descriptions and funding allocations
- Five-year findings (purpose, nexus, need, and timing) for any fund retaining unspent balances for more than five years
The report was made available to the public in compliance with Government Code Section 66006(b)(2), which requires publication at least 15 days in advance of the public meeting. The City Council's action tonight will satisfy the statutory requirement to review the report at a noticed public meeting.

This action is informational only. No fee updates are being proposed or adopted as part of this item.

Adoption of the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and updated fee schedule is addressed in a separate agenda report.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A – AB 1600 Annual Report (FY 2023–24) and Five-Year Findings (FY 2019–20 through FY 2023–24)
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

Reviewing and receiving the AB 1600 Annual & Five-Year Report is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), as it involves administrative financial reporting with no commitment to any specific project.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. The report documents past financial activity and does not authorize new expenditures.

Prepared by:

Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC
1519 E Chapman Ave, Ste C
Fullerton, CA 92831
www.revenuecost.com
DevelopmentImpactFee
AnnualReport
Cityof Grand Terrace
Fiscal Years 2019–20 through 2023–24

City of Grand Terrace Development Impact Fee Five-Year Report for FY 2019-2024 Introduction and Legal Authority
This Five-Year Development Impact Fee (DIF) Report has been prepared pursuant to the California Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code §§66000–66008 and §66001(d)). The Act requires local agencies that impose development impact fees to produce an annual accounting of fee revenues, expenditures, interest earnings, and beginning and ending fund balances, and to prepare specific findings every five years for any fee funds that remain unspent.

This report covers the five-year period from FY 2019–20 through FY 2023–24. All financial data presented in this report is sourced exclusively from the City of Grand Terrace’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Reports (ACFRs), including the budget-and-actual schedules and combining statements for the City’s non-major Development Impact Fee special revenue funds. No projections, reconstructed balances, or budget estimates are used. Where ACFR beginning balances differ from prior-year ending balances, this report follows the ACFR values exactly, as required by Government Code §66006.

The purpose of this document is to:

1. Disclose fee collections, expenditures, interest earnings, and fund balances for each DIF program.

2. Demonstrate that the City continues to retain DIF revenues only for the purposes for which they were collected.

3. Document the City’s continued need for the improvements funded by each DIF.

4. Identify remaining and anticipated funding sources needed to complete the planned improvements.

5. Establish that the improvements continue to be reasonably related to the impacts of new development.

This report addresses the following Development Impact Fee programs adopted by the City of Grand Terrace:
• Street Improvement Impact Fee
• Storm Drain Improvement Impact Fee
• Park Development Impact Fee
• Facilities Development Impact Fee (General City Facilities only) The report also includes the required five-year findings under Government Code §66001(d) for each fee program.

City of Grand Terrace Development Impact Fee Five-Year Report for FY 2019-2024 Street Improvement Development Impact Fee – Fund 11
Purpose of the Fee
The Street Improvement Development Impact Fee (Fund 11) is imposed to fund capital improvements necessary to accommodate traffic and circulation impacts generated by new development within the City. As development occurs, additional vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian trips place increased demand on the City’s street network. The fee helps ensure that new development pays its fair share toward the expanded roadway and intersection capacity needed to maintain safe and efficient circulation.

Use of the Fee
Eligible uses of Street Improvement DIF revenues include:
• Engineering design, environmental review, and permitting for capacity-related street, intersection, and traffic control improvements; • Right-of-way acquisition;
• Construction of new roadway segments, turn lanes, intersection reconfiguration, traffic signalization, and multimodal circulation enhancements; • Capital improvements that increase system capacity or mitigate growth-related impacts.

The fee may not be used for operations, routine maintenance, or like-for-like replacement of existing infrastructure that does not increase capacity or serve new development.

Five-Year Financial Activity (FY 2019–20 to FY 2023–24, ACFR-Based) The following summarizes the five-year financial activity of the Street Improvement DIF based solely on the City’s ACFRs. Beginning balances, revenues, expenditures, and ending balances are taken exactly as reported, including restatements.

A five-year summary of Street Improvement DIF activity is shown in the following table.

City of Grand Terrace Development Impact Fee Five-Year Report for FY 2019-2024 Street Improvement Five-Year Financial Activity
Fiscal
Year
Beginning
Balance
DIF
Revenues
Interest /
Other
Total
Revenues
Expenditures Ending
Balance
2019-20 $611,577 $80,567 $11,705 $92,272 $40,457 $663,392 2020-21 $663,392 $4,476 -$927 $3,549 $0 $666,941
2021-22 $666,941 $0 -$5,991 -$5,991 $0 $660,950
2022-23 $660,950 $60,228 $13,566 $73,794 $0 $734,744
2023-24 $734,744 $38,591 $32,055 $70,646 $0 $805,390
Summary of Financial Activity
Across the five-year period, the Street Improvement DIF remained active and stable, with revenues generated primarily from development activity (charges for services) and interest earnings. ACFR schedules show:
• FY 2019–20: Healthy fee revenue and interest earnings; minor expenditures on eligible street capital items.
• FY 2020–21 and 2021–22: Minimal fee activity; balances held for programming. • FY 2022–23: Significant DIF revenue (over $60,000), reflecting increased development activity; no expenditures.
• FY 2023–24: Strong revenue ($70,646), aligned with ACFR screenshots provided; no expenditures.

All funds remain restricted for future street capacity improvements. No ineligible uses occurred.

Expenditures During the Five-Year Period
During FY 2019–20, the City expended $40,457 from the Street Improvement DIF as a transfer to the Capital Improvement – Streets fund to support Barton Road improvements, as documented in the City’s ACFR budgetary comparison schedules. No additional Street Improvement DIF expenditures were recorded from FY 2020–21 through FY 2023–24. All remaining funds are being accumulated for future circulation capacity projects consistent with the purpose of the fee.

City of Grand Terrace Development Impact Fee Five-Year Report for FY 2019-2024 Ten-Year Capital Planning and Timing of Expenditures
Street Improvement DIF revenues are accumulated and programmed into the City’s longterm circulation and capital improvement planning process. Improvements funded through this DIF are typically large-scale capital projects with multi-year planning, design, and construction cycles. As such, the City employs a 10-year programming horizon to ensure that sufficient funds can be accumulated to construct meaningful circulation improvements.

The timing of expenditures will depend on:
• Completion of engineering studies and project design; • Availability of right-of-way;
• Coordination with adjacent jurisdictions and regional agencies; • Availability of complementary funding sources;
• Actual development pace and resulting fee inflow.

Based on current ACFR balances, the City anticipates deploying Street DIF revenues on eligible projects within the upcoming capital planning cycle, consistent with the ten-year programming window.

City of Grand Terrace Development Impact Fee Five-Year Report for FY 2019-2024 Storm Drain Development Impact Fee – Fund 12
Purpose of the Fee
The Storm Drain Development Impact Fee (Fund 12) is imposed to fund capital improvements to the City’s storm drainage system that are required to accommodate runoff generated by new development. As additional impervious surfaces are constructed, peak flows and system loading increase. The fee ensures that new development contributes its fair share toward the capacity improvements needed to protect public health, safety, and property from flooding and drainage system failures.

Use of the Fee
Storm Drain DIF revenues are restricted to storm drainage capital improvements and related capital costs. Eligible uses include:
• Planning, engineering, and design for storm drain capacity projects; • Land or easement acquisition for drainage facilities; • Construction of new or upsized storm drain pipes, channels, inlets, culverts, and related appurtenances;
• Capital improvements that increase system capacity or mitigate growth-related drainage impacts.

The fee may not be used for routine maintenance, operations, or like-for-like replacement of existing facilities that do not increase system capacity or serve development-related needs.

Five-Year Financial Activity (FY 2019–20 to FY 2023–24, ACFR-Based) The following table summarizes the five-year financial activity of the Storm Drain DIF based solely on the City’s ACFRs for FY 2019–20 through FY 2023–24. All beginning balances, revenues, and ending balances are taken directly from the ACFR budgetary comparison schedules and non-major fund combining statements.

City of Grand Terrace Development Impact Fee Five-Year Report for FY 2019-2024 Storm Drain Five-Year Financial Activity
Fiscal
Year
Beginning
Balance
DIF
Revenues
Interest /
Other
Total
Revenues
Expenditures Ending
Balance
2019-20 $251,735 $0 $4,231 $4,231 $0 $255,966
2020-21 $255,966 $0 $935 $935 $0 $256,901
2021-22 $298,972 $0 -$86 -$86 $0 $298,886
2022-23 $298,886 $0 $6,228 $6,228 $0 $305,114
2023-24 $305,114 $0 $9,896 $9,896 $0 $315,010
Summary of Financial Activity
• The fund began FY 2019–20 with a balance of $251,735 and grew to $315,010 by FY 2023–24.
• All increases over the period are from interest earnings; no DIF revenues (charges for services) are reported in the ACFR during this five-year window. • No expenditures or transfers out are reported in the ACFR for this fund in any of the five years.
• The FY 2021–22 beginning balance ($298,972) differs from the FY 2020–21 ending balance ($256,901), indicating an accounting restatement by the City; this report follows the ACFR values as required.

Expenditures During the Five-Year Period
According to the ACFR schedules for the Storm Drain fund, no expenditures were made from this fund between FY 2019–20 and FY 2023–24. There were no capital outlays, transfers out, or other uses of Storm Drain Improvement DIF revenues recorded during the five-year period.

As a result, all Storm Drain DIF revenues and interest earnings remain on deposit and available for future storm drainage capacity projects. No ineligible uses were identified in the ACFR.

Ten-Year Capital Planning and Timing of Expenditures
Although no Storm Drain DIF expenditures occurred during the five-year period covered by this report, the need for growth-related drainage improvements remains. Storm drainage projects tend to be large, corridor- or basin-scale improvements that require significant

City of Grand Terrace Development Impact Fee Five-Year Report for FY 2019-2024 planning, design, and construction lead time, as well as coordination with other infrastructure and development activity.

Consistent with the City’s broader capital planning approach, the Storm Drain DIF is programmed over an approximate ten-year horizon. During this period, the City will:
• Continue to accumulate Storm Drain DIF revenues and interest; • Identify and prioritize storm drain capacity projects through its capital planning and engineering efforts;
• Deploy accumulated funds on specific capital projects once they are fully scoped and ready for construction;
• Coordinate Storm Drain DIF uses with other funding sources, as available.

The retention of funds over this period is therefore necessary to ensure that sufficient resources are available to deliver meaningful, system-level capacity improvements when projects are ready to proceed.

City of Grand Terrace Development Impact Fee Five-Year Report for FY 2019-2024 Park Development Impact Fee – Fund 13
Purpose of the Fee
The Park Development Impact Fee (Fund 13) is imposed on new development to fund capital improvements required to maintain adequate parkland and recreational facilities as the City grows. As new residents and employees are added, demand increases for park acreage, active and passive recreation amenities, restrooms, playgrounds, athletic fields, and related public improvements. The fee ensures that new development contributes its fair share toward the cost of expanding and improving the City’s park system to maintain service levels for the community.

Use of the Fee
Revenues collected through the Park Development DIF are restricted to capital improvements that expand or enhance park and recreation facilities. Eligible uses include:
• Acquisition of parkland or easements;
• Development or expansion of active and passive recreational areas; • Construction of capital amenities such as fields, courts, playgrounds, trails, restrooms, shade structures, lighting, and parking;
• Capital improvements that increase the capacity of the City’s park and recreation system to serve new development.

Park DIF revenues may not be used for general operations, ongoing maintenance, or repair of existing facilities unless such work is part of an eligible capacity-increasing capital project.

Five-Year Financial Activity (FY 2019–20 to FY 2023–24, ACFR-Based) The Park Development DIF financial activity for FY 2019–20 through FY 2023–24 is summarized below using only the City’s ACFR budgetary comparison schedules and nonmajor governmental fund combining statements. All values reflect audited actuals.

A five-year summary of Park Development Impact Fee activity is shown in the following table.

City of Grand Terrace Development Impact Fee Five-Year Report for FY 2019-2024 Park Development Impact Fee Fund Five-Year Financial Activity Fiscal
Year
Beginning
Balance
DIF
Revenues
Interest /
Other
Total
Revenues Expenditures Ending Balance
2019–20 $136,105 $0 $2,256 $2,256 $100,000 $38,361
2020–21 $38,361 $0 $304 $304 $0 $38,665
2021–22 $38,195 $0 –$941 –$941 $0 $37,254
2022–23 $37,254 $272 $1,842 $2,114 $0 $39,368
2023–24 $39,368 $0 $4,330 $4,330 $0 $43,698
Summary of Financial Activity
Park Development DIF activity over the five-year period reflects:
• One capital expenditure in FY 2019–20 ($100,000), as documented in the ACFR; • Interest earnings in all years except FY 2021–22 (which shows a small negative interest adjustment of –$941, as reported in the ACFR); • The FY 2021–22 beginning balance of $38,195 differs from the FY 2020–21 ending balance of $38,665, indicating an accounting adjustment; this report follows the balances reported in the City’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR). • Minimal DIF revenue (charges for services) during the period, with the only recorded DIF revenue being $272 in FY 2022–23;
• No expenditures from FY 2020–21 through FY 2023–24.
• The fund balance increased modestly through interest earnings and ended FY 2023– 24 with $43,698.

Expenditures During the Five-Year Period
The ACFR shows a single expenditure during FY 2019–20, consisting of a $100,000 capital outlay for park improvements. The ACFR classifies this expenditure as capital outlay within the Park Development DIF fund, consistent with the restricted purpose of park development capital improvements.

No additional Park Development DIF expenditures were recorded from FY 2020–21 through FY 2023–24. All unspent revenues remain restricted for future parkland or recreational facility enhancements that support growth and maintain the City’s level of service.

City of Grand Terrace Development Impact Fee Five-Year Report for FY 2019-2024 Ten-Year Capital Planning and Timing of Expenditures
Park development projects often require multi-year planning, environmental review, design, community engagement, and construction. In addition, meaningful improvements frequently require the accumulation of sufficient resources to fund full facilities or large-scale enhancements.

Accordingly, the City manages the Park Development DIF on an approximate ten-year capital planning horizon, during which it:
• Identifies future park and recreation needs tied to development; • Accumulates DIF revenues and interest earnings;
• Sequences projects when sufficient funds are available and projects are ready to move forward;
• Coordinates DIF uses with grants, General Fund contributions, or other sources, as appropriate.

The retention of funds over this period is necessary to assemble adequate resources for park development projects that maintain the City’s service standards as growth occurs.

City of Grand Terrace Development Impact Fee Five-Year Report for FY 2019-2024 Facilities Development Impact Fee – Fund 19
Purpose of the Fee
The Facilities Development Impact Fee (Fund 19) is imposed on new development to fund capital improvements necessary to expand or upgrade general City facilities as population and employment increase. Growth places additional demands on administrative, regulatory, and public-facing facilities that support City operations. The fee ensures that new development contributes its fair share toward expanding or improving City facilities required to maintain service levels.

Facilities supported by this fee generally include City Hall, administrative offices, public works facilities, and other general government buildings that provide essential municipal services.

Use of the Fee
Facilities Development DIF revenues are restricted to capital improvements that expand the capacity of general City facilities or enhance their ability to serve new development. Eligible uses include:
• Construction or expansion of general government buildings; • Renovations, upgrades, or capital improvements that increase functional capacity;
• Land or easement acquisition for new or expanded facilities; • Capital furnishings, equipment, and systems required for facility operation that support increased service demand caused by development.

The fee may not be used for routine maintenance, staff salaries, or like-for-like replacement of existing facilities unless the work is part of a capacity-increasing capital improvement.

Five-Year Financial Activity (FY 2019–20 to FY 2023–24, ACFR-Based) The following summarizes the Facilities Development DIF activity for FY 2019–20 through FY 2023–24 using only audited ACFR data. Each year’s beginning balance, revenues, expenditures, and ending balance are taken directly from the City’s ACFR budgetary comparison schedules or non-major fund combining statements.

City of Grand Terrace Development Impact Fee Five-Year Report for FY 2019-2024 Facilities Development Impact Fee Fund Five-Year Financial Activity Fiscal
Year
Beginning
Balance
DIF
Revenues
Interest /
Other
Total
Revenues Expenditures Ending Balance
2019-20 $356,797 $30,866 $5,808 $36,674 $93,100 $300,371 2020-21 $300,371 $60,425 $1,139 $61,564 $60,425 $301,510 2021-22 $301,510 $0 -$3,556 -$3,556 $766 $297,954
2022-23 $297,954 $0 $1,113 $1,113 $3,999 $295,068
2023-24 $295,068 $0 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $295,068
Summary of Financial Activity
Facilities Development DIF activity shows a pattern of recurring, ACFR-documented capital expenditures, unlike the other DIF funds:
• FY 2019–20: $93,100 (capital outlay)
• FY 2020–21: $60,425
• FY 2021–22: $766
• FY 2022–23: $3,999
• FY 2023–24: $5,000
These transactions represent the only DIF program with continuous capital activity throughout the five-year period. Revenues consisted primarily of DIF collections in 2019–20 and 2020–21 and ongoing interest adjustments thereafter.

Ending fund balance at FY 2023–24: $295,068.

Expenditures During the Five-Year Period
The ACFR schedules report Facilities Development DIF expenditures in all five years. Because these amounts were recorded within the Facilities Development DIF special revenue fund— which is legally restricted to general City facility capital improvements—this report treats these amounts as eligible capital uses, consistent with Government Code §66006 and the purpose of the Facilities Development DIF.

City of Grand Terrace Development Impact Fee Five-Year Report for FY 2019-2024 The ACFR does not list project-level detail for each expenditure. However, no ineligible uses (such as operations, maintenance, or General Fund transfers) were disclosed, and all expenditures are classified as capital or capital-related within this restricted fund.

Ten-Year Capital Planning and Timing of Expenditures
General City facility projects often require multi-year planning, design, permitting, and funding coordination. Because facilities improvements vary in cost and scope, the City programs Facilities Development DIF revenues over an approximate ten-year capital horizon, allowing funds to accumulate sufficiently to deliver meaningful improvements. This horizon also aligns with typical building renovation and expansion cycles.

During the next ten years, the City will continue to:
• Identify facility needs driven by population and employment growth; • Prioritize improvements that increase capacity or functionality; • Combine DIF revenues with other sources when appropriate; • Deploy funds when project scoping and design are complete.

The retention of DIF balances during this period is necessary to fund significant capital upgrades to general City facilities as growth occurs.

City of Grand Terrace Development Impact Fee Five-Year Report for FY 2019-2024 Conclusion
This Five-Year Development Impact Fee Report demonstrates that the City of Grand Terrace has complied with the Mitigation Fee Act requirements governing the collection, accounting, and expenditure of development impact fees for the Street Improvement, Storm Drain Improvement, Park Development, and Facilities Development programs. For each development impact fee fund, the City has documented beginning and ending balances, fee revenues, interest earnings, and expenditures based on its audited financial statements.

Where fee revenues remain unexpended for five years or more, this report provides the findings required by Government Code §66001(d), including the continued purpose of each fee, the relationship between the fee and the funded improvements, and the anticipated timing and sources of funding needed to construct those improvements. The City will continue to monitor development impact fee balances, update its capital planning, and report development impact fee activity annually in accordance with State law.

AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: January 13, 2026
TITLE: Award of Professional Services Agreement with Willdan for Gateway Specific Plan Engineering and Project Management Services
PRESENTED BY: Shanita Tillman, Sr. Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION:

AWARD A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT TO WILLDAN IN
AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $394,772 FOR ENGINEERING AND

PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES RELATED TO THE GATEWAY
SPECIFIC PLAN, PHASE 1, FOR A THREE-YEAR TERM WITH TWO
OPTIONAL ONE-YEAR EXTENSIONS; AND

AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT AND ANY SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS UP TO TEN PERCENT (10%) OF THE

CONTRACT AMOUNT, SUBJECT TO CITY ATTORNEY APPROVAL AS

TO FORM
2030 VISION STATEMENT:

Goal 1: Fiscal Viability — Ensures appropriate fiscal stewardship through the use of an existing reimbursement agreement to recover eligible project-related costs associated with implementation of the Gateway Specific Plan
BACKGROUND:

The Gateway Specific Plan is a complex, multiphase project that has been under development for more than a decade and involves land use entitlements, infrastructure planning, and coordination with a private developer.

Interwest Consulting Group previously served as the City’s consultant under a professional services agreement that began on March 13, 2018, and expired on March 18, 2023. During the term of that agreement, planning and preliminary support work was completed; however, the project did not advance to an implementation-ready phase by the end of the contract term.

Following expiration of the prior agreement, staff evaluated project needs and determined that renewed consultant support was necessary to move the project forward, particularly in the areas of project management, engineering coordination, and entitlement implementation. As staff resumed work on the project, certain analyses, coordination efforts, and supporting documentation were identified as incomplete or not fully developed and will require further evaluation as the project advances.

DISCUSSION:

The Gateway Specific Plan requires specialized technical support that the City does not currently have the in-house capacity to perform. Consultant services are needed to provide project management, engineering coordination, infrastructure planning support, and coordination related to right-of-way and entitlement implementation.

On October 20, 2025, the City issued a Request for Proposals for engineering and project management services related to implementation of the Gateway Specific Plan. The solicitation was advertised and administered through the Public Purchase online bidding platform and closed on December 10, 2025.

Two firms submitted proposals: Willdan and Interwest Consulting Group. Interwest’s proposal was submitted after the bid closing deadline and was therefore deemed non-responsive and disqualified.

Willdan submitted a responsive proposal that met the City’s requirements and demonstrated relevant experience with similar large-scale planning and infrastructure coordination efforts.

The proposed Professional Services Agreement is structured as a three-year term with two one-year extension options. The consultant’s scope and fee proposal include services intended to address incomplete documentation, unresolved coordination items, and project elements that were not fully developed during prior efforts. Certain project components remain undefined or subject to future submittals and agency review requirements and will require further evaluation as the project advances.

The existing Reimbursement Agreement with Lewis Land Developers, LLC provides for reimbursement of City-incurred costs associated with entitlement processing and project implementation, including consultant services, engineering review, technical analysis, and related coordination necessary to advance the Gateway Specific Plan. While the Reimbursement Agreement remains in effect through November 2026, staff anticipates returning to City Council closer to its expiration to address any necessary extension or successor agreement to ensure continued project implementation.

Proceeding with consultant services at this time is necessary to maintain project momentum, address outstanding project gaps, and position the City to move forward with entitlement and infrastructure coordination activities without further delay.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

Approval of the Professional Services Agreement is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act and does not result in a direct or indirect physical change to the environment. Therefore, this action is not subject to CEQA review.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Costs associated with this agreement will be advanced by the City. Based on the scope of services and the provisions of the existing Reimbursement Agreement approved by City Council on November 14, 2023, staff anticipates that the majority of eligible project-related implementation costs will be reimbursed by Lewis Land Developers, LLC and charged against the established deposit account 23- 515-60-00.

Certain services included in the consultant’s scope may require further evaluation to determine reimbursement eligibility. The City recognizes that some costs may ultimately be the City’s

responsibility, and any costs determined to fall outside the scope of reimbursable project-related expenses shall be charged to 10-175-250-020-000, subject to available appropriations.

AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES
By and Between

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
and

WILLDAN ENGINEERING

Gateway Specific Plan (Phase 1) – Engineering and Project Management Services 1 AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES

BETWEEN THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE AND

WILLDAN ENGINEERING
This AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES (herein “Agreement”) is made and entered into this 13th day of January, 2026 by and between the City of Grand Terrace, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and Willdan Engineering, a California Corporation (“Consultant”). City and Consultant may be referred to, individually or collectively, as “Party” or “Parties.”

RECITALS
A. City has sought, by issuance of a Request for Proposals or Invitation for Bids, the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement.

B. Consultant, following submission of a proposal or bid for the performance of the services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement, was selected by the City to perform those services.

C. Pursuant to the City of Grand Terrace’s Municipal Code, City has authority to enter into and execute this Agreement.

D. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of those services defined and described particularly in Article 1 of this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.

OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT

1.1 Scope of Services.

In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Consultant shall provide those services specified in the “Scope of Services” attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, which may be referred to herein as the “services” or “work” hereunder. As a material inducement to the City entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience, and facilities necessary to properly perform the services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent, and professional manner, and is experienced in performing the work and services contemplated herein. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all services described herein. Consultant covenants that it shall follow the highest professional standards in performing the work and services required hereunder and that all materials will be both of good quality as well as fit for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase “highest professional standards” shall mean those standards of practice recognized by one or more first-class firms performing similar work under similar circumstances.

1.2 Consultant’s Proposal.

Gateway Specific Plan (Phase 1) – Engineering and Project Management Services 2 The Scope of Services shall include the Consultant’s scope of work or bid which shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of such proposal and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern.

1.3 Compliance with Law.

Consultant shall keep itself informed concerning, and shall render all services hereunder in accordance with, all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any Federal, State or local governmental entity having jurisdiction in effect at the time service is rendered.

1.4 California Labor Law.

If the Scope of Services includes any “public work” or “maintenance work,” as those terms are defined in California Labor Code section 1720 et seq. and California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000 et seq., and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant shall pay prevailing wages for such work and comply with the requirements in California Labor Code section 1770 et seq. and 1810 et seq., and all other applicable laws, including the following requirements:
(a) Public Work. The Parties acknowledge that some or all of the work to be performed under this Agreement is a “public work” as defined in Labor Code Section 1720 and that this Agreement is therefore subject to the requirements of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code relating to public works contracts and the rules and regulations established by the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) implementing such statutes. The work performed under this Agreement is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. Consultant shall post job site notices, as prescribed by regulation.
(b) Prevailing Wages. Consultant shall pay prevailing wages to the extent required by Labor Code Section 1771. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1773.2, copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file at City Hall and will be made available to any interested party on request. By initiating any work under this Agreement, Consultant acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) determination of the prevailing rate of per diem wages, and Consultant shall post a copy of the same at each job site where work is performed under this Agreement.
(c) Penalty for Failure to Pay Prevailing Wages. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1774 and 1775 concerning the payment of prevailing rates of wages to workers and the penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages. The Consultant shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit two hundred dollars ($200) for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the prevailing rates as determined by the DIR for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any public work done pursuant to this Agreement by Consultant or by any subcontractor. (d) Payroll Records. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1776, which requires Consultant and each subconsultant to: keep accurate payroll records and verify such records in writing under penalty of perjury, as specified in Section 1776; certify and make such payroll records available for inspection as provided by Section 1776; and inform the City of the location of the records.
(e) Apprentices. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1777.7 and California Code of Regulations Title 8, Section 200 et seq. concerning the employment of apprentices on public works projects. Consultant shall be responsible for compliance with

Gateway Specific Plan (Phase 1) – Engineering and Project Management Services 3 these aforementioned Sections for all apprenticeable occupations. Prior to commencing work under this Agreement, Consultant shall provide City with a copy of the information submitted to any applicable apprenticeship program. Within sixty (60) days after concluding work pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant and each of its subconsultants shall submit to the City a verified statement of the journeyman and apprentice hours performed under this Agreement.
(f) Eight-Hour Work Day. Consultant acknowledges that eight (8) hours labor constitutes a legal day's work. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by Labor Code Section 1810. (g) Penalties for Excess Hours. Consultant shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Section 1813 concerning penalties for workers who work excess hours. The Consultant shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the performance of this Agreement by the Consultant or by any subcontractor for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more than eight (8) hours in any one calendar day and forty (40) hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code.

Pursuant to Labor Code section 1815, work performed by employees of Consultant in excess of eight (8) hours per day, and forty (40) hours during any one week shall be permitted upon public work upon compensation for all hours worked in excess of 8 hours per day at not less than one and one-half (1½) times the basic rate of pay. (h) Workers’ Compensation. California Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700 provide that every employer will be required to secure the payment of compensation to its employees if it has employees. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1861, Consultant certifies as follows:
“I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract.” Consultant’s Authorized Initials __________________________________ Vanessa Munoz, President

(i) Consultant’s Responsibility for Subcontractors. For every subcontractor who will perform work under this Agreement, Consultant shall be responsible for such subcontractor's compliance with Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code, and shall make such compliance a requirement in any contract with any subcontractor for work under this Agreement.

Consultant shall be required to take all actions necessary to enforce such contractual provisions and ensure subcontractor's compliance, including without limitation, conducting a review of the certified payroll records of the subcontractor on a periodic basis or upon becoming aware of the failure of the subcontractor to pay his or her workers the specified prevailing rate of wages. Consultant shall diligently take corrective action to halt or rectify any such failure by any subcontractor.

1.5 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments.

Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the Consultant’s performance of the services required by this Agreement, and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its officers, employees or agents of City,

Gateway Specific Plan (Phase 1) – Engineering and Project Management Services 4 against any such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder.

1.6 Familiarity with Work.

By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant (i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (ii) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (iii) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. If the services involve work upon any site, Consultant warrants that Consultant has or will investigate the site and is or will be fully acquainted with the conditions there existing, prior to commencement of services hereunder. Should the Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of the services hereunder, Consultant shall immediately inform the City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer.

1.7 Care of Work.

The Consultant shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of this Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the work, and the equipment, materials, papers, documents, plans, studies and/or other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the work by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City’s own negligence.

1.8 Further Responsibilities of Parties.

Both Parties agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement. Both Parties agree to act in good faith to execute all instruments, prepare all documents and take all actions as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. Unless hereafter specified, neither Party shall be responsible for the service of the other.

1.9 Additional Services.

City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from said work. No such extra work may be undertaken unless a written order is first given by the Contract Officer (as defined below) to the Consultant, incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum (or a portion of the compensation due to Consultant) for the actual costs of the extra work, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of the Consultant. Any increase in compensation of up to ten percent (10%) of the Contract Sum or $25,000, whichever is less; or, in the time to perform of up to one hundred eighty (180) days, may be approved by the Contract Officer. Any greater increases, taken either separately or cumulatively, must be approved by the City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor. City may in its sole and absolute discretion have similar work done by other Consultants. No claims for an increase in the Contract Sum or time for performance shall be valid unless the procedures established in this Section are followed.

1.10 Contract Modifications.

Gateway Specific Plan (Phase 1) – Engineering and Project Management Services 5 Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the “Contract Modifications” attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit “B” and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit “B” shall govern.

ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT.

2.1 Contract Sum.

Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the amounts specified in the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed Three Hundred Ninety-Four Thousand Seven Hundred Seventy-Two Dollars and Zero Cents ($394,772.00) (the “Contract Sum”), unless additional compensation is approved pursuant to Section 1.9.

2.2 Method of Compensation.

The method of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion; (ii) payment in accordance with specified tasks or the percentage of completion of the services, less contract retention; (iii) payment for time and materials based upon the Consultant’s rates as specified in the Schedule of Compensation, provided that (a) time estimates are provided for the performance of sub tasks, (b) contract retention is maintained, and (c) the Contract Sum is not exceeded; or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation.

2.3 Reimbursable Expenses.

Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, telephone expenses, and travel expenses approved by the Contract Officer in advance, or actual subcontractor expenses of an approved subcontractor pursuant to Section 4.5, and only if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by the City. Coordination of the performance of the work with City is a critical component of the services. If Consultant is required to attend additional meetings to facilitate such coordination, Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings.

2.4 Invoices.

Each month Consultant shall furnish to City an original invoice for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month in a form approved by City’s Director of Finance. By submitting an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Consultant shall be deemed to have certify compliance with all provisions of this Agreement. The invoice shall contain all information specified in Exhibit “C”, and shall detail charges for all necessary and actual expenses by the following categories: labor (by sub-category), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub-contractor contracts. Sub-contractor charges shall also be detailed by such categories. Consultant shall not invoice City for any duplicate services performed by more than one person.

City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. Except as to any charges for work performed or expenses incurred by Consultant which are disputed by City, or as provided in Section 7.3, City will use its best efforts to cause Consultant to be paid within forty-five (45) days of receipt

Gateway Specific Plan (Phase 1) – Engineering and Project Management Services 6 of Consultant’s correct and undisputed invoice; however, Consultant acknowledges and agrees that due to City warrant run procedures, the City cannot guarantee that payment will occur within this time period. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City for any invoice provided by the Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law.

2.5 Waiver.

Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant.

ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE

3.1 Time of Essence.

Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.

3.2 Schedule of Performance.

Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the “Schedule of Performance” attached hereto as Exhibit “D” and incorporated herein by this reference. When requested by the Consultant, extensions to the time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer but not exceeding one hundred eighty (180) days cumulatively.

3.3 Force Majeure.

The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including the City, if the Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of the Contract Officer such delay is justified. The Contract Officer’s determination shall be final and conclusive upon the Parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant be entitled to recover damages against the City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused, Consultant’s sole remedy being extension of this Agreement pursuant to this Section.

3.4 Term.

Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 7 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services but not exceeding three (3) years from the date hereof (“Term”), except as otherwise provided in the Schedule of Performance (as shown on Exhibit “D” attached hereto). The City Manager may, at his/her sole discretion, extend the Term for two additional one-year terms.

ARTICLE 4. COORDINATION OF WORK

4.1 Representatives and Personnel of Consultant.

Gateway Specific Plan (Phase 1) – Engineering and Project Management Services 7 The following principals of Consultant (“Principals”) are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith:

Melanie Grant, Project Manager
(Name), (Title)
It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the foregoing principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing principals shall be responsible during the Term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. All personnel of Consultant, and any authorized agents, shall at all times be under the exclusive direction and control of the Principals. For purposes of this Agreement, the foregoing Principals may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced by Consultant without the express written approval of City. Additionally, Consultant shall utilize only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement. Consultant shall notify City of any changes in Consultant’s staff and subcontractors, if any, assigned to perform the services required under this Agreement, prior to and during any such performance.

4.2 Status of Consultant.

Consultant shall have no authority to bind City in any manner, or to incur any obligation, debt or liability of any kind on behalf of or against City, whether by contract or otherwise, unless such authority is expressly conferred under this Agreement or is otherwise expressly conferred in writing by City. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant’s officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officials, officers, employees or agents of City. Neither Consultant, nor any of Consultant’s officers, employees or agents, shall obtain any rights to retirement, health care or any other benefits which may otherwise accrue to City’s employees. Consultant expressly waives any claim Consultant may have to any such rights.

4.3 Contract Officer.

The Contract Officer shall be the Senior Management Analyst or Public Works Director/Engineer, or such person as may be designated by the City Manager. It shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and the Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer. The Contract Officer shall have authority, if specified in writing by the City Manager, to sign all documents on behalf of the City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement.

4.4 Independent Consultant.

Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode or means by which Consultant, its agents or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision or control of Consultant’s employees, servants, representatives or agents, or in fixing their number, compensation or hours of service. Consultant shall

Gateway Specific Plan (Phase 1) – Engineering and Project Management Services 8 perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City.

City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Consultant in its business or otherwise or a joint venturer or a member of any joint enterprise with Consultant.

4.5 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment.

The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the express written approval of the City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated or encumbered voluntarily or by operation of law, whether for the benefit of creditors or otherwise, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Consultant, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. In the event of any such unapproved transfer, including any bankruptcy proceeding, this Agreement shall be void. No approved transfer shall release the Consultant or any surety of Consultant of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City.

ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

5.1 Insurance Coverages.

Without limiting Consultant’s indemnification of City, and prior to commencement of any services under this Agreement, Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its sole cost and expense during the Term of this Agreement, policies of insurance of the type and amounts described below and in a form satisfactory to City.
(a) General Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage, including without limitation, blanket contractual liability. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO “insured contract” language will not be accepted.
(b) Automobile Liability Insurance. Consultant shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the services to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident.
(c) Professional Liability (errors & omissions) Insurance. Consultant shall maintain professional liability insurance that covers the Services to be performed in connection with this Agreement, in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this Agreement and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three (3) years after completion of the services required by this Agreement.

Gateway Specific Plan (Phase 1) – Engineering and Project Management Services 9 (d) Workers’ Compensation Insurance. Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance (with limits of at least $1,000,000). (e) Subcontractors. Consultant shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall include all of the requirements stated herein. (f) Additional Insurance. Policies of such other insurance, as may be required in the Contract Modifications in Exhibit “B”.

5.2 General Insurance Requirements.
(a) Proof of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein, along with a waiver of subrogation endorsement for workers’ compensation. Insurance certificates and endorsements must be approved by City’s Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with City at all times during the Term of this Agreement. City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.
(b) Duration of Coverage. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Services hereunder by Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subconsultants.
(c) Primary/Noncontributing. Coverage provided by Consultant shall be primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by City shall not be required to contribute with it. The limits of insurance required herein may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance.

Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of City before the City’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. (d) City’s Rights of Enforcement. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement.
(e) Acceptable Insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance or that is on the List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers in the State of California, with an assigned policyholders’ Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VI (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by the City’s Risk Manager. (f) Waiver of Subrogation. All insurance coverage maintained or procured pursuant to this agreement shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against City, its elected or appointed officers, agents, officials, employees and volunteers or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants.

Gateway Specific Plan (Phase 1) – Engineering and Project Management Services 10 (g) Enforcement of Contract Provisions (non-estoppel). Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of the City to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligations on the City nor does it waive any rights hereunder. (h) Requirements not Limiting. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type. If the Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.
(i) Notice of Cancellation. Consultant agrees to oblige its insurance agent or broker and insurers to provide to City with a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation (except for nonpayment for which a ten (10) day notice is required) or nonrenewal of coverage for each required coverage. (j) Additional Insured Status. General liability and automobile policies shall provide or be endorsed to provide that City and its officers, officials, employees, and agents, and volunteers shall be additional insureds under such policies. This provision shall also apply to any excess/umbrella liability policies. (k) Prohibition of Undisclosed Coverage Limitations. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved by the City in writing. (l) Separation of Insureds. A severability of interests provision must apply for all additional insureds ensuring that Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limits of liability. The policy(ies) shall not contain any cross-liability exclusions.
(m) Pass Through Clause. Consultant agrees to ensure that its subconsultants, subcontractors, and any other party involved with the services who is brought onto or involved in the services by Consultant, provide the same minimum insurance coverage and endorsements required of Consultant. Consultant agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Consultant agrees that upon request, all agreements with consultants, subcontractors, and others engaged in the services will be submitted to City for review. (n) City’s Right to Revise Specifications. The City reserves the right at any time during the Term of this Agreement to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Consultant, the City and Consultant may renegotiate Consultant’s compensation. (o) Deductibles / Self-insured Retentions. Any deductibles and self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions with respect to the City, it officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers, or the Consultant shall provide a financial guarantee satisfactory to the city guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration and defense expense.

Gateway Specific Plan (Phase 1) – Engineering and Project Management Services 11 (p) Timely Notice of Claims. Consultant shall give City prompt and timely notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Consultant’s performance under this Agreement, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required liability policies. (q) Additional Insurance. Consultant shall also procure and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the work.

5.3 Indemnification.

To the full extent permitted by law, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, any and all actions, either judicial, administrative, arbitration or regulatory claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities whether actual or threatened (herein “claims or liabilities”) that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of the work, operations or activities provided herein of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, or invitees, or any individual or entity for which Consultant is legally liable (“indemnitors”), or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ reckless or willful misconduct, or arising from Consultant’s or indemnitors’ negligent performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, and in connection therewith:
(a) Consultant will defend any action or actions filed in connection with any of said claims or liabilities and will pay all costs and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in connection therewith;
(b) Consultant will promptly pay any judgment rendered against the City, its officers, agents or employees for any such claims or liabilities arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform such work, operations or activities of Consultant hereunder; and Consultant agrees to save and hold the City, its officers, agents, and employees harmless therefrom; (c) In the event the City, its officers, agents or employees is made a party to any action or proceeding filed or prosecuted against Consultant for such damages or other claims arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of or failure to perform the work, operation or activities of Consultant hereunder, Consultant agrees to pay to the City, its officers, agents or employees, any and all costs and expenses incurred by the City, its officers, agents or employees in such action or proceeding, including but not limited to, legal costs and attorneys’ fees.
(d) Consultant shall incorporate similar indemnity agreements with its subcontractors and if it fails to do so Consultant shall be fully responsible to indemnify City hereunder therefore, and failure of City to monitor compliance with these provisions shall not be a waiver hereof. This indemnification includes claims or liabilities arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Consultant in the performance of professional services hereunder. The provisions of this Section do not apply to claims or liabilities occurring as a result of City’s sole negligence or willful acts or omissions, but, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall apply to claims and liabilities resulting in part from City’s negligence, except that design professionals’ indemnity hereunder shall be limited to claims and liabilities arising out of the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the design professional. The indemnity obligation shall be binding on successors and assigns of Consultant and shall survive termination of this Agreement.

ARTICLE 6. RECORDS, REPORTS, AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION

Gateway Specific Plan (Phase 1) – Engineering and Project Management Services 12 6.1 Records.

Consultant shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and services performed hereunder (the “books and records”), as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such services. Any and all such documents shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts from such records. Such records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the services hereunder, and the City shall have access to such records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Consultant’s business, custody of the books and records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Consultant’s successor in interest. Notwithstanding the above, the Consultant shall fully cooperate with the City in providing access to the books and records if a public records request is made and disclosure is required by law including but not limited to the California Public Records Act.

6.2 Reports.

Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require. Consultant hereby acknowledges that the City is greatly concerned about the cost of work and services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Consultant agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the work or services contemplated herein or, if Consultant is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Consultant shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Consultant is providing design services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed.

6.3 Ownership of Documents.

All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (the “documents and materials”) prepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed documents for other projects and/or use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by the Consultant will be at the City’s sole risk and without liability to Consultant, and Consultant’s guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use, reuse or assignment.

Consultant may retain copies of such documents for its own use. Consultant shall have the right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. Moreover, Consultant with respect to any documents and materials that may qualify as “works made for hire” as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such documents and materials are hereby deemed “works made for hire” for the City.

6.4 Confidentiality and Release of Information.

Gateway Specific Plan (Phase 1) – Engineering and Project Management Services 13 (a) All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer. (b) Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from the Contract Officer or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. (c) If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney’s fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct.
(d) Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.

ARTICLE 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION

7.1 California Law.

This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the Parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California.

7.2 Disputes; Default.

In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default.

Instead, the City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively thirty (30) days, but may be extended, though not reduced, if circumstances warrant, as determined by the Contract Officer. The cure period may run concurrently with the termination period as provided in Section 7.7, if the option to cure in the alternative to termination. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, the City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative, the City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default, the City may take necessary steps to terminate this

Gateway Specific Plan (Phase 1) – Engineering and Project Management Services 14 Agreement under this Article. Any failure on the part of the City to give notice of the Consultant’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of the City’s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.

7.3 Retention of Funds.

Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant (whether or not arising out of this Agreement) (i) any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute hereunder or which are necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, and (ii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by reason of Consultant’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant’s obligation under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of the Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein.

7.4 Waiver.

Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any Party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non-defaulting Party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. Any waiver by either Party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.

7.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative.

Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative and the exercise by either Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other Party.

7.6 Legal Action.

In addition to any other rights or remedies, either Party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, Consultant shall file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code Sections 905 et seq. and 910 et seq., in order to pursue a legal action under this Agreement.

7.7 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term.

This Section shall govern any termination of this Agreement except as specifically provided in the following Section for termination for cause. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days’ written notice to Consultant, except that where termination is due

Gateway Specific Plan (Phase 1) – Engineering and Project Management Services 15 to the fault of the Consultant, the period of notice may be such shorter time as may be determined by the Contract Officer. In addition, the Consultant reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon sixty (60) days’ written notice to City, except that where termination is due to the fault of the City, the period of notice may be such shorter time as the Consultant may determine. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Except where the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, except as provided in Section 7.3. In the event the Consultant has initiated termination, the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation only for the reasonable value of the work product actually produced hereunder. In the event of termination without cause pursuant to this Section, the terminating party need not provide the non-terminating party with the opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7.2.

7.8 Termination for Default of Consultant.

If termination is due to the failure of the Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that the City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to the Consultant for the purpose of set-off or partial payment of the amounts owed the City as previously stated.

7.9 Attorneys’ Fees.

If either Party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees. Attorney’s fees shall include attorneys’ fees on any appeal, and in addition a Party entitled to attorneys’ fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment.

ARTICLE 8. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION

8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees.

No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to the Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.

8.2 Conflict of Interest.

Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the Contract Officer. Consultant agrees

Gateway Specific Plan (Phase 1) – Engineering and Project Management Services 16 to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement.

No officer or employee of the City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which affects her/his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which (s)he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. The Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.

8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination.

Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class.

8.4 Unauthorized Aliens.

Consultant hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., as amended, and in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Consultant so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or services covered by this Agreement, and should any liability or sanctions be imposed against City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Consultant hereby agrees to and shall reimburse City for the cost of all such liabilities or sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorneys’ fees, incurred by City.

ARTICLE 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

9.1 Notices.

Any notice, demand, request, document, consent, approval, or communication either Party desires or is required to give to the other Party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail, in the case of the City, to the City Manager and to the attention of the Contract Officer (with her/his name and City title), City of Grand Terrace, 22795 Barton Rd., Grand Terrace, California 92313, and in the case of the Consultant, to the person(s) at the address designated on the execution page of this Agreement. Either Party may change its address by notifying the other Party of the change of address in writing.

Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in seventy-two (72) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section.

9.2 Interpretation.

The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either Party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.

9.3 Counterparts and Electronic Signatures.

Gateway Specific Plan (Phase 1) – Engineering and Project Management Services 17 This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. The words “execution,” “signed,” “signature,” and words of like import in this Agreement or in any other certificate, agreement or document related to this Agreement, shall include images of manually executed signatures transmitted by facsimile or other electronic format (including, without limitation, “pdf”, “tif” or “jpg”) and other electronic signatures (including, without limitation, DocuSign and AdobeSign). The use of electronic signatures and electronic records (including, without limitation, any contract or other record created, generated, sent, communicated, received, or stored by electronic means) shall be of the same legal effect, validity and enforceability as a manually executed signature or use of a paper-based record-keeping system to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, including the Federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, the California Uniform Electronic Transactions Act and any other applicable law, including, without limitation, any state law based on the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act or the Uniform Commercial Code.

9.4 Integration; Amendment.

This Agreement including the attachments hereto is the entire, complete and exclusive expression of the understanding of the Parties. It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the Parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the Parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by the Consultant and by the City Council. The Parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void.

9.5 Severability.

In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the Parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either Party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.

9.6 Warranty & Representation of Non-Collusion.

No official, officer, or employee of City has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, nor shall any official, officer, or employee of City participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which may affect his/her financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any corporation, partnership, or association in which (s)he is directly or indirectly interested, or in violation of any State or municipal statute or regulation.

The determination of “financial interest” shall be consistent with State law and shall not include interests found to be “remote” or “noninterests” pursuant to Government Code Sections 1091 or 1091.5. Consultant warrants and represents that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give, to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, any money, consideration, or other thing of value as a result or consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement. Consultant further warrants and represents that (s)he/it has not engaged in any act(s), omission(s), or other conduct or collusion that would result in the payment of any money, consideration, or other thing of value to any third party including, but not limited to, any City official, officer, or employee, as a result of consequence of obtaining or being awarded any agreement.

Consultant is aware of and understands that any such act(s), omission(s) or other conduct resulting in such

Gateway Specific Plan (Phase 1) – Engineering and Project Management Services 18 payment of money, consideration, or other thing of value will render this Agreement void and of no force or effect.

Consultant’s Authorized Initials __________________________________ Vanessa Munoz, President

9.7 Authority.

The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Parties hereto warrant that (i) such Party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said Party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such Party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) that entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other agreement to which said Party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Parties.
[SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE]

Gateway Specific Plan (Phase 1) – Engineering and Project Management Services 19 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written.

CITY:

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, a municipal corporation
By:
_______________________________________________
Konrad Bolowich
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP
Adrian R. Guerra
City Attorney
ATTEST:

Daysi Alcocer
City Clerk
CONSULTANT:

WILLDAN ENGINEERING, a California Corporation
By:
_______________________________________________
Name: Vanessa Munoz
Title: President
Email Address: [email protected]
By:
_______________________________________________
Name: Kate Nguyen
Title: Secretary
Email Address: [email protected]
Address: Including City, State, Zip
Tyrone Peter
Director of Engineering
2401 E Katella Ave, Suite 300
Anahiem, CA 92806

Gateway Specific Plan (Phase 1) – Engineering and Project Management Services 20 Two corporate officer signatures required when Consultant is a corporation, with one signature required from each of the following groups: 1) Chairman of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. CONSULTANT’S SIGNATURES SHALL BE DULY NOTARIZED UNLESS EXECUTED UTILIZING DOCUSIGN. IN ADDITION, THE APPROPRIATE

ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY.

Gateway Specific Plan (Phase 1) – Engineering and Project Management Services 21 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
On __________, 2026 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature: _____________________________________

OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form

CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT

INDIVIDUAL

CORPORATE OFFICER
_______________________________

TITLE(S)

PARTNER(S) LIMITED

GENERAL

ATTORNEY-IN-FACT

TRUSTEE(S)

GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER_______________________________
______________________________________
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
(NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES))
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
___________________________________

TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________

NUMBER OF PAGES
___________________________________

DATE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________

SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document.

Gateway Specific Plan (Phase 1) – Engineering and Project Management Services 22 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
On __________, 2026 before me, ________________, personally appeared ________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature: _____________________________________

OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.

CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT

INDIVIDUAL

CORPORATE OFFICER
_______________________________

TITLE(S)

PARTNER(S) LIMITED

GENERAL

ATTORNEY-IN-FACT

TRUSTEE(S)

GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
OTHER_______________________________
______________________________________
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
(NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES))
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
___________________________________

TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________

NUMBER OF PAGES
___________________________________

DATE OF DOCUMENT
___________________________________

SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document.

01247.0001 2077776.1 1/8/2026 A-1
EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES
I. Consultant will perform the following services:

A. Support the City’s Gateway Specific Plan (Phase 1) by assisting with plan review, technical coordination, and compliance tracking. Consultant’s work shall be consistent with California Public Works standards, the Subdivision Map Act, and the City’s adopted Engineering Design Standards, to facilitate the advancement of the 112-acre development.

B. Plan Reviews:
i. Street Improvement Plans

1. 2166-ST.pdf-STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS (27 Sheets)
ii. Storm Drain Improvement Documents

1. 2166-SD.pdf-STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PLANS (19
Sheets)

2. 2166_HYDROLOGY COMBINED
(240 pages Hydrology)
(15 sheets Mass Grading Plans)
(8 sheets Basin Imp. Plans)

3. 2166 WQMP COMBINED (231 pages)
iii. Water Improvement Plans

1. 2166 12IN WAT.pdf-12" WATER IMPROVEMENT PLANS (13
Sheets)
iv. Water Relocation Plans

1. 2166 SEW.pdf-OFFSITE SEWER IMPROVEMENT PLANS (3
Sheets)
v. Street Light Plans

1. 2166-STLT.pdf-STREET LIGHT PLANS (4 Sheets)
vi. Plans Not Yet Submitted

01247.0001 2077776.1 1/8/2026 A-2

1. Park Precise Grading Plans (PCI)

2. Final Map-TR20501 (PCI)
vii. 4
th and Subsequent Reviews
viii. Additional Plan Sets
C. Other Services
i. Utility Coordination
ii. Mapping, Cost Estimates, and Bond Review
iii. Stormwater and NPDES Compliance Verification
iv. Phasing and Infrastructure Sequencing Confirmation
v. Support for Maintenance Mechanisms (LLMD/CFD/HOA)
vi. Council Reporting and Presentation Support
vii. Administrative Deliverables
viii. Project Management and Public Works Compliance Oversight ix. Funding Coordination / Measure 1 Nexus Support
x. Right-of-Way (ROW) and Land Acquisition Coordination xi. Bidding-Phase Support
xii. Construction Management Oversight
xiii. Reimbursement and Labor-Compliance Tracking
xiv. Conditions of Approval Compliance
xv. Constructability Review
xvi. Meetings and Coordination
II. In addition to the requirements of Section 6.2, during performance of the services, Consultant will keep the City appraised of the status of performance.

III. All work product is subject to review and acceptance by the City, and must be revised by the Consultant without additional charge to the City until found satisfactory and accepted by City.

01247.0001 2077776.1 1/8/2026 A-3
IV. Consultant will utilize the following personnel to accomplish the services, as set forth in the Staffing Plan below:

01247.0001 2077776.1 1/8/2026 B-1
EXHIBIT “B”

CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS
(Superseding Contract Boilerplate)
None.

01247.0001 2077776.1 1/8/2026 C-1
EXHIBIT “C”

SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
I. Consultant shall perform the following tasks at following rates:

01247.0001 2077776.1 1/8/2026 C-2
II. Within the budgeted amounts for each Task, and with the approval of the Contract Officer, funds may be shifted from one Task subbudget to another so long as the Contract Sum is not exceeded per Section 2.1, unless Additional Services are approved per Section 1.9.

III. The City will compensate Consultant for the services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice is to include:

A. Line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate.

B. Line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services.

C. Line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation.

D. Line items for all approved subcontractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services.

IV. The total compensation for the Services shall not exceed the Contract Sum as provided in Section 2.1 of this Agreement.

V. The Consultant’s billing rates for all personnel are attached as Exhibit “C-1”.

VI. It is the intent of the City that the compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be reimbursed by the developer, Lewis Land Developers, LLC. Accordingly, compensation to Consultant shall be conditioned on prior reimbursement by the developer.

01247.0001 2077776.1 1/8/2026 D-1
EXHIBIT “C-1”

BILLING RATES

01247.0001 2077776.1 1/8/2026 D-2
EXHIBIT “D”

SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
I. Consultant shall perform all services timely in accordance with the schedule to be developed by Consultant and subject to the written approval of the Contract Office and the City Attorney’s office.

III. The Contract Officer may approve extensions for performance of the services in accordance with Section 3.2.

AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: January 13, 2026
TITLE: Approve Check #83091 to Mayor Hussey in the amount of $359.85 from the November 2025 Check Register
PRESENTED BY: Christine Clayton, Finance Director
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE CHECK #83091 TO MAYOR HUSSEY IN THE AMOUNT OF $359.85 FROM THE NOVEMBER 2025 CHECK REGISTER
2030 VISION STATEMENT:

This staff report supports Goal #1, “Ensuring Our Fiscal Viability”, through the continuous monitoring of expenditure budgets, allocations, and operational costs.

BACKGROUND:

The check register for the month of November-2025 was prepared in accordance with Government Code §37202 and submitted to City Council at the January 13, 2026 meeting.

The check register lists all vendor payments for the respective month, along with a brief description of the type of goods or services purchased and the account code(s) associated with each payment. The check registers list all payments made to vendors and employee reimbursements during the month.

DISCUSSION:

The November 2025 check register is submitted to City Council on January 13, 2026 with the exception of check #83091 to Mayor Hussey for $359.85 to reimburse him for health insurance. The Mayor has to recuse himself from voting on this check, necessitating a separate vote to approve this expenditure.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:

The disbursement was made in accordance with the approved budget for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
FY2025-26

GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER
22795 BARTON ROAD GRAND TERRACE, CA 92313

CHECK REGISTER
Account Index
The Grand Terrace City Council meets on the Second Tuesday of each month at 6:00 pm.

City of Grand Terrace Check Register Index
Bill Hussey, Mayor
Michelle Sabino, Mayor Pro Tem
Doug Wilson, Council Member
Jeff Allen, Council Member
Matt Brown, Council Member

Fund Dept Acct
No. Fund Name No. Department Cost Center No. General Account Numbers 09 CHILD CARE FUND 110 CITY COUNCIL 110 SALARIES/WAGES
10 GENERAL FUND 120 CITY MANAGER 115 OVERTIME
11 STREET FUND 125 CITY CLERK 120 COUNCIL STIPENDS
12 STORM DRAIN FUND 140 FINANCE 138 MEDICARE / SUI
13 PARK FUND 160 CITY ATTORNEY 139 EMPLOYEES' BENEFIT PLAN 14 AB 3229 COPS FUND 172 BUILDING & SAFETY 140 RETIREMENT 15 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND 175 PUBLIC WORKS 142 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 16 GAS TAX FUND 180 COMMUNITY EVENTS 143 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 17 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 185 RENTAL INSPECTION PROGRAM 210 OFFICE EXPENSE 18 TRANS. DEV. ACT (T D A FUND) 187 ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM 211 POSTAGE & MAILING 19 FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT FUND 190 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 220 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL EXP 20 MEASURE I FUND 195 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 230 ADVERTISING 21 WASTE WATER DISPOSAL FUND 370 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SVCS 235 COMMUNICATIONS 22 COMMUNITY DEV. BLOCK GRANT 380 MGT INFORMATION SYSTEMS 238 UTILITIES 25 SPRING MOUNTAIN RANCH FUND 410 LAW ENFORCEMENT 240 RENTS & LEASES 26 LSCPG/ LGHTG ASSESSMENT DIST. 411 ASSET FORFEITURES 244 CUSTODIAL SERVICES 32 S/A CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 430 RECREATION SERVICES 245 MAINT BLDG GRNDS EQUIPMNT 36 S/A 2011 TABS BOND PROCEEDS 441 CHILD CARE - NUTRITION GRANT 246 MAINT/OPER OF EQUIPMNT 45 CIP - COMMERCE WAY 445 CHILD CARE - TINY TOTS 250 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 46 CIP - STREET IMPROVEMENTS 446 CHILD CARE - AFTER SCHOOL 251 BANKING SERVICE CHARGES 47 CIP - BARTON RD. BRIDGE PROJECT 447 CHILD CARE - PRE-SCHOOL 252 ROAD MAINTENANCE 48 CIP - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 450 PARKS MAINTENANCE 254 STREET SWEEPING 49 CIP - PARKS 461 COMMUNITY GRANTS 255 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50 CAPITAL PROJECT BOND PROCEEDS 500 AIR QUALITY PROGRAMS 256 ANIMAL SHELTERING SVCS 52 HOUSING AUTHORITY 510 STREET & SIGNAL LIGHTING 260 INSURANCE & SURETY BONDS 61 COMMUNITY BENEFITS FUND 573 LINE MAINTENANCE 265 MEMBERSHIPS & DUES 62 LIGHT UP GRAND TERRACE FUND 600 ZONE 1 13364 CANAL -TERR PINES 268 TRAINING 63 ILLEGAL FIREWORKS FUND 601 ZONE 3 TRACT 14471 PICO & ORIOLE 270 TRAVEL/CONFERENCES/MTGS 64 PUBLIC SAFETY FUND 602 ZONE 2 14264 FORREST CITY PHASE II 271 MILEAGE 65 SENIOR BUS PROGRAM FUND 603 ZONE 4 TRACT 17766 GREENBRIAR 625 NPDES 66 CAL RECYCLE GRANT 604 ZONE 5 TRACT 18793 PALOMINO 631 STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE 67 PUBLIC EDUC & GOVT ACCESS (PEG) 605 ZONE 6 TRACT 18071 JADEN 801 PLANNING COMMISSION 68 40TH YR CELEBRATION FUND 606 ZONE 7 TRACT 18604 TESORO/VAN BUREN 804 HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMM. 69 COMMUNITY DAY FUND 625 NPDES 311 FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS 70 FIXED ASSED/EQUIP REPL FUND 631 STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE 570 WASTEWATER TREATMENT 73 ACTIVE TRANS PRGM (ATP) GRANT 700 CAPITAL OUTLAY 400 OTHER COMMUNITY GRANTS 74 HIGHWAY SFTY IMPV PRGM (HSIP) 705 EVERY 15 MINUTES 601 ELECTRICAL VEHICLE STATIONS 75 EMER MGMT PREP GRANT (EMPG) 801 PLANNING COMMISSION 700 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 76 ENHANCED INFRA FIN DIST (EIFD) 804 HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMITTEE 701 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT OTHER 77 SO CAL INCENTIVE PROJECT (SCIP) 805 SENIOR CITIZENS PROGRAM 705 VEHICLES 90 COVID-19 EMERGENCY FUND 808 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PROG. 998 OVERHEAD COST ALLOCATION 95 DOG PARK ENDOWMENT FUND 999 TRANSFERS 999 TRANSFERS OUT

%+6;1()4#0&6'44#%'
FY202-2

GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER
22795 BARTON ROAD GRAND TERRACE, CA 92313
CHECK REGISTER &+(&.3091
ŝůů,ƵƐƐĞLJ, Mayor
DŝĐŚĞůůĞ^ĂďŝŶŽ, Mayor Pro Tem
ŽƵŐtŝůƐŽŶ͕ŽƵŶĐŝůDĞŵďĞƌ
:ĞĨĨůůĞŶ͕ŽƵŶĐŝůDĞŵďĞƌ
DĂƚƚƌŽǁŶ͕ŽƵŶĐŝůDĞŵďĞƌ
The Grand Terrace City Council meets on the Second Tuesday of each month at 6:00 pm.

Invoice #
Christine Clayton, Finance Director
11/05/2025
Total Checks: 359.85
E 10-110-142-000-000 359.85
359.85
359.85
Vendor Invoice Description Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total 83091 11/13/2025 WILLIAM HUSSEY NOV2025-BH HLTH REIM NOV 2025 HEALTH REIMBURSEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 37202, I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORE

LISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CITY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE ACCURATE, NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CITY. I FURTHER CERTIFY, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THAT THE CITY HAS AVAILABLE FUNDS FOR PAYMENT THEREOF.

Check # Date
Check Register

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
As of 11/30/2025

This page left intentionally blank.

AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: January 13, 2026
TITLE: Approval of the November-2025 Check Register in the Amount of $321,113.76.

PRESENTED BY: Christine Clayton, Finance Director
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE THE CHECK REGISTER NO. 11302025 IN THE AMOUNT OF $321,113.76 AS SUBMITTED, FOR THE MONTH ENDING NOVEMBER 30, 2025
2030 VISION STATEMENT:

This staff report supports Goal #1, “Ensuring Our Fiscal Viability”, through the continuous monitoring of expenditure budgets, allocations, and operational costs.

BACKGROUND:

The check register for the month of November-2025 has been prepared in accordance with Government Code §37202 and is hereby submitted for City Council’s approval.

The check register lists all vendor payments for the respective month, along with a brief description of the type of goods or services purchased and the account code(s) associated with each payment. The check registers list all payments made to vendors and employee reimbursements during the month of November-2025.

The attached index to the Check Register is a guideline account list only and is not intended to replace the comprehensive chart of accounts used by the City and Grand Terrace Successor Agency.

Expenditure account number formats are XX-XXX-XXX [Fund-Department-Account]. Expenditures may be made from trust/agency accounts (Fund 23-XXX-) or temporary clearing accounts that do not have a budgetary impact.

DISCUSSION:

CHECK REGISTER
A total of $321,113.76 in accounts payable checks and/or wires were issued during the period for services, reimbursements, supplies, and contracts and are detailed in the individual monthly register.

Below is a table that lists payments larger than $10,000 for the month of November-2025.

Payments larger than $10,000:

Check No. Payee Description Amount
83084 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO FY2025-26 Q1 ANIMAL

CONTROL OPERATING COSTS
$11,064.06

AND JUL 2025 CIP COSTS
83092 LILBURN CORPORATION OCT-NOV 2025

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FOR GRAND T-1, SA 25-04, SA
25-05, AND SA 23-21
$13,682.50
83109 ST FRANCIS ELECTRIC BATTERY BACKUP SYSTEM

INSTALL AT BARTON/HONEY

HILL AND LED DRIVER

REPLACEMENT AT BARTON
BRIDGE, OCT 2025 ROUTINE

AND RESPONSE SERVICES
$20,768.40
83121 ALESHIRE & WYNDER LLP OCT LEGAL SERVICES $27,550.37 83130 COMPLETE PAPERLESS

SOLUTIONS
FY2025-26 LASERFICHE

ANNUAL MAINTENANCE
$11,182.63
83146 ON SITE COMPUTING DEC 2025 IT SERVICES AND

MONITOR
$11,321.17
83151 SWRCB FY2025-26 SWRCB SEWER

PERMIT FEE
$10,920.00
18058272 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

RETIREMENT

RETIREMENT

CONTRIBUTIONS FOR PAY
DATE 10/30/2025
$12,477.77
18091050 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

RETIREMENT

RETIREMENT

CONTRIBUTIONS FOR PAY
DATE 11/13/2025
$12,537.06
18095641 CA PUB EMPLOYEES

RETIRE SYSTEM
NOV 2025 PERS HEALTH

INSURANCE
$29,544.20
32285066 SO CA EDISON COMPANY OCT 2025 ENERGY USAGE $19,681.20 464009725 US BANK OCT-NOV 2025 CAL CARD

CHARGES
$20,997.16

TOTAL PAYMENTS LARGER
THAN $10,000
$201,726.52

PAYROLL
Payroll costs for the month:

Pay
Per.

Period
Start
Period
End
Pay Date Amount

Nov25
10 From 10/25/2025 to 11/07/2025 11/13/2025 $83,276.88
11 From 11/08/2025 to 11/21/2025 11/26/2025 $86,368.69
$169,645.57
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:

All disbursements (including payroll) were made in accordance with the approved budget for Fiscal Year 2025-26 in the amount of:

Description Amount
Nov-25
Check
Register $321,113.76
Payroll $169,645.57
$490,759.33

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
FY2025-26

GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER
22795 BARTON ROAD GRAND TERRACE, CA 92313

CHECK REGISTER
Account Index
The Grand Terrace City Council meets on the Second Tuesday of each month at 6:00 pm.

City of Grand Terrace Check Register Index
Bill Hussey, Mayor
Michelle Sabino, Mayor Pro Tem
Doug Wilson, Council Member
Jeff Allen, Council Member
Matt Brown, Council Member

Fund Dept Acct
No. Fund Name No. Department Cost Center No. General Account Numbers 09 CHILD CARE FUND 110 CITY COUNCIL 110 SALARIES/WAGES
10 GENERAL FUND 120 CITY MANAGER 115 OVERTIME
11 STREET FUND 125 CITY CLERK 120 COUNCIL STIPENDS
12 STORM DRAIN FUND 140 FINANCE 138 MEDICARE / SUI
13 PARK FUND 160 CITY ATTORNEY 139 EMPLOYEES' BENEFIT PLAN 14 AB 3229 COPS FUND 172 BUILDING & SAFETY 140 RETIREMENT 15 AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND 175 PUBLIC WORKS 142 HEALTH/LIFE INSURANCE 16 GAS TAX FUND 180 COMMUNITY EVENTS 143 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 17 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 185 RENTAL INSPECTION PROGRAM 210 OFFICE EXPENSE 18 TRANS. DEV. ACT (T D A FUND) 187 ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM 211 POSTAGE & MAILING 19 FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT FUND 190 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 220 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL EXP 20 MEASURE I FUND 195 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 230 ADVERTISING 21 WASTE WATER DISPOSAL FUND 370 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SVCS 235 COMMUNICATIONS 22 COMMUNITY DEV. BLOCK GRANT 380 MGT INFORMATION SYSTEMS 238 UTILITIES 25 SPRING MOUNTAIN RANCH FUND 410 LAW ENFORCEMENT 240 RENTS & LEASES 26 LSCPG/ LGHTG ASSESSMENT DIST. 411 ASSET FORFEITURES 244 CUSTODIAL SERVICES 32 S/A CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 430 RECREATION SERVICES 245 MAINT BLDG GRNDS EQUIPMNT 36 S/A 2011 TABS BOND PROCEEDS 441 CHILD CARE - NUTRITION GRANT 246 MAINT/OPER OF EQUIPMNT 45 CIP - COMMERCE WAY 445 CHILD CARE - TINY TOTS 250 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 46 CIP - STREET IMPROVEMENTS 446 CHILD CARE - AFTER SCHOOL 251 BANKING SERVICE CHARGES 47 CIP - BARTON RD. BRIDGE PROJECT 447 CHILD CARE - PRE-SCHOOL 252 ROAD MAINTENANCE 48 CIP - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 450 PARKS MAINTENANCE 254 STREET SWEEPING 49 CIP - PARKS 461 COMMUNITY GRANTS 255 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50 CAPITAL PROJECT BOND PROCEEDS 500 AIR QUALITY PROGRAMS 256 ANIMAL SHELTERING SVCS 52 HOUSING AUTHORITY 510 STREET & SIGNAL LIGHTING 260 INSURANCE & SURETY BONDS 61 COMMUNITY BENEFITS FUND 573 LINE MAINTENANCE 265 MEMBERSHIPS & DUES 62 LIGHT UP GRAND TERRACE FUND 600 ZONE 1 13364 CANAL -TERR PINES 268 TRAINING 63 ILLEGAL FIREWORKS FUND 601 ZONE 3 TRACT 14471 PICO & ORIOLE 270 TRAVEL/CONFERENCES/MTGS 64 PUBLIC SAFETY FUND 602 ZONE 2 14264 FORREST CITY PHASE II 271 MILEAGE 65 SENIOR BUS PROGRAM FUND 603 ZONE 4 TRACT 17766 GREENBRIAR 625 NPDES 66 CAL RECYCLE GRANT 604 ZONE 5 TRACT 18793 PALOMINO 631 STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE 67 PUBLIC EDUC & GOVT ACCESS (PEG) 605 ZONE 6 TRACT 18071 JADEN 801 PLANNING COMMISSION 68 40TH YR CELEBRATION FUND 606 ZONE 7 TRACT 18604 TESORO/VAN BUREN 804 HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMM. 69 COMMUNITY DAY FUND 625 NPDES 311 FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS 70 FIXED ASSED/EQUIP REPL FUND 631 STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE 570 WASTEWATER TREATMENT 73 ACTIVE TRANS PRGM (ATP) GRANT 700 CAPITAL OUTLAY 400 OTHER COMMUNITY GRANTS 74 HIGHWAY SFTY IMPV PRGM (HSIP) 705 EVERY 15 MINUTES 601 ELECTRICAL VEHICLE STATIONS 75 EMER MGMT PREP GRANT (EMPG) 801 PLANNING COMMISSION 700 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 76 ENHANCED INFRA FIN DIST (EIFD) 804 HISTORICAL & CULTURAL COMMITTEE 701 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT OTHER 77 SO CAL INCENTIVE PROJECT (SCIP) 805 SENIOR CITIZENS PROGRAM 705 VEHICLES 90 COVID-19 EMERGENCY FUND 808 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PROG. 998 OVERHEAD COST ALLOCATION 95 DOG PARK ENDOWMENT FUND 999 TRANSFERS 999 TRANSFERS OUT

%+6;1()4#0&6'44#%'
FY202-2

GRAND TERRACE CIVIC CENTER
22795 BARTON ROAD GRAND TERRACE, CA 92313
MONTHLY CHECK REGISTER For the
Period Ending November 30 202
ŝůů,ƵƐƐĞLJ, Mayor
DŝĐŚĞůůĞ^ĂďŝŶŽ, Mayor Pro Tem
ŽƵŐtŝůƐŽŶ͕ŽƵŶĐŝůDĞŵďĞƌ
:ĞĨĨůůĞŶ͕ŽƵŶĐŝůDĞŵďĞƌ
DĂƚƚƌŽǁŶ͕ŽƵŶĐŝůDĞŵďĞƌ
The Grand Terrace City Council meets on the Second Tuesday of each month at 6:00 pm.

Invoice #
(46) POLYCOM VVX 450 PHONES
AT HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT AT 21935 VAN BUREN
(2) YARD SALE SIGNS

MONITORING

INSURANCE

RICHARD ROLLINS PARK
Check Register

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
As of 11/30/2025
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Description Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total 83076 11/13/2025 8X8 INC 5289959 NOV 2025 SERVICE CHARGE FOR 11/01/2025 E 10-190-235-000-000 1,326.19
1,326.19
1,326.19
83077 11/13/2025 AAA HOARDING AND BIOHAZARD 102925 REMOVAL OF BIOHAZARDOUS MATERIALS 10/29/2025 E 10-187-256-020-000 3,658.00
3,658.00
3,658.00
83078 11/13/2025 JEANNIE ADAIR 11062025 REFUND YARD SALE SIGN DEPOSIT FOR 11/06/2025 B 23-515-22-00 20.00

20.00 20.00
83079 11/13/2025 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 1174983357 OCT-DEC 2025 SENIOR CENTER SECURITY 10/27/2025 E 10-805-245-000-000 113.10
113.10
113.10
83080 11/13/2025 AMERITAS LIFE INSURANCE CORP NOV 2025 NOV 2025 EMPLOYEE PAID DENTAL 11/01/2025 B 10-022-70-00 773.16
773.16
773.16
83081 11/13/2025 ATHLETIC FIELD SPECIALISTS 8376 OCT 2025 TURF MAINTENANCE FOR 10/31/2025 E 10-450-245-000-000 2,350.00
2,350.00
2,350.00

Invoice #
Check Register

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
As of 11/30/2025
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Description Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total

CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION
OR TREAT 2025
COSTS

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT COSTS

AT MAIN ST AND MICHIGAN ST

AT MAIN ST AND MICHIGAN ST

AT MAIN ST AND MICHIGAN ST
83082 11/13/2025 BENSON PRODUCTIONS 1626 OCT 2025 VIDEOGRAPHER SERVICES FOR 11/05/2025 E 67-380-250-000-000 1,010.00
1,010.00
1,010.00
83083 11/13/2025 CAT TRACKING INC 21301 WATER BARRIER RENTAL FOR TRUNK 10/31/2025 E 10-120-220-200-000 216.00
216.00
216.00
83084 11/13/2025 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO 2026-00000014 FY2025-26 Q1 ANIMAL CONTROL OPERATING 11/05/2025 E 10-185-255-000-000 6,512.06
6,512.06
2026-00000009 JUL 2025 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES - 11/05/2025 E 10-185-255-000-000 4,552.00
4,552.00
11,064.06
83085 11/13/2025 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TLMA ADM TL0000017917 JUNE 2025 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MONITORING 11/06/2025 E 10-175-246-000-000 409.53
409.53
TL0000017943 AUG 2025 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MONITORING 11/10/2025 E 10-175-246-000-000 210.36
210.36
TL0000017930 JUL 2025 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MONITORING 11/10/2025 E 10-175-246-000-000 191.38
191.38
811.27

Invoice #
Check Register

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
As of 11/30/2025
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Description Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total PROCESSING FOR SEP 2025
FEES FOR SEP 2025
FOR SEP 2025

CELEBRATION AT SENIOR CENTER
(5) YARD SALE SIGNS

MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
83086 11/13/2025 DATA TICKET INC 184755 GRAND TERRACE - CODE ENFORCEMENT 10/23/2025 E 10-185-255-000-000 546.80
546.80
184940 GRAND TERRACE - CITATION PROCESSING 10/23/2025
E 10-140-255-000-000 173.99
173.99
185176 GRAND TERRACE- STREET SWEEPING 10/23/2025
E 10-140-255-000-000 62.50

62.50 783.29
83087 11/13/2025 ANGIE GRISAFE DELAROSA 172 ENTERTAINMENT FOR THANKSGIVING 11/02/2025 E 10-805-220-000-000 200.00
200.00
200.00
83088 11/13/2025 GOODMAN AND ASSOCIATES 6075 OCT 2025 INTERIM CITY ENGINEER SERVICES 11/03/2025 E 10-175-250-020-000 3,430.00
3,430.00
3,430.00
83089 11/13/2025 VIVIAN HERNANDEZ 10132025 REFUND YARD SALE SIGN DEPOSIT FOR 10/13/2025 B 23-515-22-00 50.00

50.00 50.00
83090 11/13/2025 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICE 5270885 PLANTING SUPPLIES, LED LIGHTS, AND 10/03/2025 E 10-175-244-000-000 310.68
E 10-195-245-000-000 39.12
E 10-450-245-000-000 83.29
433.09

Invoice #
Check Register

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
As of 11/30/2025
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Description Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total

CLEANING SUPPLIES
1613993
3271825 TOTES, MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES, AND 10/15/2025
E 10-195-245-000-000 64.79
E 10-450-245-000-000 52.12
E 62-120-220-000-000 190.20
307.11
1271934 TOOLS, BATTERIES, AND PAINT SUPPLIES 10/17/2025 E 10-175-218-000-000 189.19
E 10-195-245-000-000 18.77
E 10-450-245-000-000 64.83
272.79
7613110 SHOVEL AND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 10/01/2025
E 10-175-218-000-000 32.60
E 10-450-245-000-000 67.47
100.07
5901977 PAINT SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL 10/23/2025
E 10-195-245-000-000 92.05

92.05 8614440 PAINT AND GRAFFITI REMOVAL SUPPLIES 10/10/2025 E 10-175-244-000-000 29.49
E 10-805-245-000-000 44.24

73.73 LIGHT REPAIR SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL 10/07/2025
E 10-195-245-000-000 10.85

10.85 1,289.69

Invoice #
Check Register

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
As of 11/30/2025
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Description Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total FOR GRAND T1
FOR SA 25-04
FOR SA 25-05
FOR SA 23-21
FOR SENIOR CENTER 9/13/2025
RICHARD ROLLINS PARK 11/1/2025
(2) YARD SALE SIGNS
83092 11/13/2025 LILBURN CORPORATION 25-1135 OCT-NOV 2025 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11/06/2025 B 23-515-21-00 8,352.50
8,352.50
25-1129 OCT-NOV 2025 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11/06/2025
B 23-520-09-00 1,845.00
1,845.00
25-1130 OCT-NOV 2025 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11/06/2025
B 23-520-10-00 1,845.00
1,845.00
25-1132 OCT-NOV 2025 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11/06/2025
B 23-515-72-00 1,640.00
1,640.00
13,682.50
83093 11/13/2025 DIANA LOVE 11062025 PARTIAL REFUND - RESERVATION DEPOSIT 11/06/2025 B 23-515-22-00 80.75

80.75 80.75
83094 11/13/2025 CRYSTAL MARTINEZ 11112025 REFUND RESERVATION DEPOSIT FOR 11/11/2025 B 23-515-22-00 100.00
100.00
100.00
83095 11/13/2025 DOMINIQUE MCCREE 11052025 REFUND YARD SALE SIGN DEPOSIT FOR 11/05/2025 B 23-515-22-00 20.00

20.00 20.00

Invoice #
Check Register

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
As of 11/30/2025
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Description Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total (5) YARD SALE SIGNS

CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
OCT 2025
83096 11/13/2025 MIDAMERICA ADMIN RETIREMENT PAYDATE 11132025 ARS PAYDATE 11132025 ARS RETIREMENT 11/13/2025 B 10-022-68-00 282.15
282.15
282.15
83097 11/13/2025 KIMBERLY NESCI 11112025 REFUND YARD SALE SIGN DEPOSIT FOR 11/11/2025 B 23-515-22-00 50.00

50.00 50.00
83098 11/13/2025 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 443756045001 RESTROOM AND BREAKROOM SUPPLIES 10/30/2025 E 10-190-210-000-000 237.59
E 10-195-245-000-000 213.24
E 10-450-245-000-000 426.48
E 10-805-245-000-000 213.24
1,090.55
1,090.55
83099 11/13/2025 ON SITE COMPUTING 54004966 STREAMING ENCODER REPLACEMENT FOR 11/07/2025 E 10-380-210-000-000 1,672.23
1,672.23
1,672.23
83100 11/13/2025 PETTY CASH 11122025 REPLENISH PETTY CASH SEP 2025 TO 11/12/2025 E 10-185-220-000-000 600.00
E 10-190-226-000-000 119.00
E 10-805-220-000-000 106.94
B 23-515-21-00 100.00
B 23-520-18-00 50.00
E 62-120-220-000-000 101.62
1,077.56
1,077.56

Invoice #
Check Register

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
As of 11/30/2025
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Description Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total

AND SENIOR CENTER
05K8710047048

SYSTEM RENTAL

DEVELOPMENT
FITNESS PARK 11/2/2025
RICHARD ROLLINS PARK 11/8/2025
83101 11/13/2025 PRIMO BRANDS 05K8710353697 OCT 2025 WATER SERVICES FOR CITY HALL 11/04/2025 E 10-190-238-000-000 113.44
E 10-805-238-000-000 94.30
207.74
OCT-NOV 2025 WATER FILTRATION 11/04/2025
E 10-190-238-000-000 49.45

49.45 257.19
83102 11/13/2025 Q3 CONSULTING 38552 SEP 2025 STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN 10/31/2025 E 10-631-255-000-000 1,462.50
1,462.50
1,462.50
83103 11/13/2025 QUADIENT LEASING USA INC Q2101346 OCT-DEC 2025 POSTAGE METER LEASE 11/10/2025 E 10-190-211-000-000 967.55
967.55
967.55
83104 11/13/2025 ROSALBA ROCHA 11112025 REFUND RESERVATION DEPOSIT FOR 11/11/2025 B 23-515-22-00 50.00

50.00 50.00
83105 11/13/2025 AMELIA SAENZ 11112025 REFUND RESERVATION DEPOSIT FOR 11/11/2025 B 23-515-22-00 50.00

50.00 50.00

Invoice #
Check Register

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
As of 11/30/2025
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Description Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total

AND PICO PARKS
67496

FOR MAINTENANCE STAFF

ROLLINS PARK

AT TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT BARTON AND HONEY HILL
83106 11/13/2025 SCA OF CA LLC CA25003409 OCT 2025 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES 10/31/2025 E 16-900-254-000-000 8,688.67
8,688.67
8,688.67
83107 11/13/2025 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 160116266-001 TOOLS AND IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 10/29/2025 E 10-175-218-000-000 85.78
E 10-175-244-000-000 186.17
E 10-195-245-000-000 180.10
452.05
452.05
83108 11/13/2025 SO CAL LOCKSMITH 67510 PEDESTRIAN GATE FOR RICHARD ROLLINS 09/22/2025 E 10-450-245-000-000 5,148.61
5,148.61
DOOR REPAIR AT CITY HALL 09/17/2025
E 10-195-245-000-000 220.00
220.00
67409 LOCK REPAIR AT SHERIFF SUBSTATION 08/19/2025
E 10-195-245-000-000 150.00
150.00
67660 REPLACEMENT KEYS TO SENIOR CENTER 11/05/2025
E 10-175-210-000-000 83.46

83.46 67626 KEYS FOR LOCKBOX AT RICHARD 10/28/2025
E 10-450-245-000-000 11.85

11.85 5,613.92
83109 11/13/2025 ST FRANCIS ELECTRIC 22147786 BATTERY BACKUP SYSTEM INSTALLATION 10/31/2025 E 16-510-255-000-000 14,902.41
14,902.41

Invoice #
Check Register

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
As of 11/30/2025
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Description Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total

AT BARTON BRIDGE

MAINTENANCE

MAINTENANCE

AT CITY HALL
1004025-3

VETERAN'S FREEDOM PARK
COURT
22147785 LED DRIVER REPLACEMENT FOR LIGHTING 10/31/2025 E 16-510-255-000-000 3,122.60
3,122.60
22147787 OCT 2025 RESPONSE TRAFFIC SIGNAL 10/31/2025
E 16-510-255-000-000 2,185.84
2,185.84
22147784 OCT 2025 ROUTINE TRAFFIC SIGNAL 10/31/2025
E 16-510-255-000-000 557.55
557.55
20,768.40
83110 11/13/2025 STERICYCLE INC 8012567747 10-29-2025 RECORDS DESTRUCTION 11/10/2025 E 10-125-250-000-000 167.44
167.44
167.44
83111 11/13/2025 TODD PETERS ELECTRICAL CONTRAC 1004025-5 HIGH BAY LIGHTING REPLACEMENT 11/10/2025 E 10-195-245-000-000 3,984.55
3,984.55
ELECTRICAL CLOCK INSTALLATION AT 11/10/2025
E 10-450-245-000-000 499.00
499.00
4,483.55
83112 11/13/2025 TRUELINE CONSTRUCTION 2981 PAINT STRIPE PLAY LINES ON PICKLEBALL 11/10/2025 E 10-450-245-000-000 2,420.00
2,420.00
2,420.00

Invoice #
Check Register

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
As of 11/30/2025
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Description Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total

MAINTENANCE FEE

REGULATORY COST
FOR CANCELLED RESERVATION 11/8/2025
RICHARD ROLLINS PARK 11/8/2025
(4) YARD SALE SIGNS
83113 11/13/2025 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 1020250326 NOV 2025 MONTHLY DATABASE 11/01/2025 E 16-900-220-000-000 64.00

64.00 25-261346 NOV 2025 CA STATE FEE FOR 11/01/2025
E 16-900-220-000-000 46.43

46.43 110.43
83114 11/13/2025 ELVIRA VALENZUELA 11112025 REFUND RESERVATION DEPOSIT AND FEE 11/11/2025 R 10-450-01 55.00
B 23-515-22-00 50.00
105.00
105.00
83115 11/13/2025 VERIZON WIRELESS 6126823804 ALPR LINE CHARGES SEP-OCT 2025 10/23/2025 E 10-190-235-000-000 190.05
190.05
190.05
83116 11/13/2025 CANDYCE VIZCARRA 11112025 REFUND RESERVATION DEPOSIT FOR 11/11/2025 B 23-515-22-00 50.00

50.00 50.00
83117 11/13/2025 ROSIE WHITEHEAD 11112025 REFUND YARD SALE SIGN DEPOSIT FOR 11/11/2025 B 23-515-22-00 40.00

40.00 40.00

Invoice #
Check Register

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
As of 11/30/2025
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Description Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total

FOR BUILDING & SAFETY
AT HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT AT 21582 MAIN ST

HOUSING GROUP, LLC
MICHIGAN/21600 WALNUT
83118 11/13/2025 WILLDAN 002-36312 OCT 2025 PLAN CHECK/ INSPECTION SVCS 11/04/2025 E 10-172-250-100-000 8,057.80
8,057.80
8,057.80
83119 11/25/2025 A STORAGE PLACE 12/01/2025 - B15 DEC 2025 RENT FOR UNIT B15 11/16/2025 E 10-140-241-000-000 240.00
240.00
240.00
83120 11/25/2025 AAA HOARDING AND BIOHAZARD 11525 REMOVAL OF BIOHAZARDOUS MATERIALS 11/05/2025 E 10-187-256-020-000 3,985.00
3,985.00
3,985.00
83121 11/25/2025 ALESHIRE AND WYNDER LLP 100203 OCT 2025 LEGAL SERVICES - GENERAL 11/12/2025 E 10-160-250-000-000 10,670.00
10,670.00
100209 OCT 2025 LEGAL SERVICES - COMMUNITY 11/12/2025
E 10-160-250-100-000 7,903.97
7,903.97
100210 OCT 2025 LEGAL SERVICES - 12466 11/12/2025
E 10-160-250-100-000 3,709.60
3,709.60

Invoice #
Check Register

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
As of 11/30/2025
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Description Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total

SPECIFIC PLAN
AFTER 42 HRS

HOUSING AUTHORITY

ENFORCEMENT
100202
SERVICES FOR (1) DOG
100201 OCT 2025 LEGAL SERVICES - GATEWAY 11/12/2025
B 23-515-90-00 2,332.70
2,332.70
100849 OCT 2025 LEGAL SERVICES - GENERAL 11/12/2025
E 10-160-250-000-000 971.30
971.30
100847 OCT 2025 LEGAL SERVICES FOR GT 11/12/2025
E 52-400-251-000-000 798.00
798.00
100208 OCT 2025 LEGAL SERVICES - CODE 11/12/2025
E 10-160-250-100-000 754.50
754.50
OCT 2025 LEGAL SERVICES FOR BRSP 11/12/2025
B 23-515-59-00 410.30
410.30
27,550.37
83122 11/25/2025 ANIMAL EMERGENCY CLINIC 582874 NOV 2025 EMERGENCY VETERINARY 11/08/2025 E 10-185-250-000-000 800.00
800.00
800.00
83123 11/25/2025 AT AND T NOV 2025 AT&T NOV 2025 AT&T 11/01/2025 E 10-190-235-000-000 260.75
E 10-450-235-000-000 720.42
E 10-805-235-000-000 1,387.80
E 10-808-235-000-000 34.81
2,403.78
2,403.78

Invoice #
Check Register

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
As of 11/30/2025
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Description Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total

CELEBRATION AT SENIOR CENTER
(2) YARD SALE SIGNS
(2) YARD SALE SIGNS

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT COSTS
83124 11/25/2025 BALLUSIONIST 2602 ENTERTAINMENT FOR NEW YEAR 01/05/2026 E 10-805-220-000-000 100.00
100.00
100.00
83125 11/25/2025 CAROLYN BOWYER 11192025 REFUND YARD SALE SIGN DEPOSIT FOR 11/19/2025 B 23-515-22-00 20.00

20.00 20.00
83126 11/25/2025 BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES INC 11132025 TRASH 07/01/2024 - 06/30/2025 DELINQ TRASH COLLECTIONS 11/13/2025 B 23-302-90-00 2,960.34
B 23-303-90-00 2,052.81
5,013.15
5,013.15
83127 11/25/2025 FRANCHESKA BYMA 11192025 REFUND YARD SALE SIGN DEPOSIT FOR 11/19/2025 B 23-515-22-00 20.00

20.00 20.00
83128 11/25/2025 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 234703801110125 CITY HALL ELEVATOR PHONE - NOV 2025 11/01/2025 E 10-195-245-000-000 40.00

40.00 40.00
83129 11/25/2025 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO 2026-00000019 OCT 2025 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES - 11/18/2025 E 10-185-255-000-000 4,552.00
4,552.00
4,552.00

Invoice #
Check Register

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
As of 11/30/2025
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Description Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total

MAINTENANCE

CIVIC CENTER, CANAL STRIP, ORIOLE
TRACT 18070 JADEN

MAINTENANCE
83130 11/25/2025 COMPLETE PAPERLESS SOLUTIONS 4664 FY2025-26 LASERFICHE ANNUAL 11/17/2025 E 10-125-250-000-000 11,182.63
11,182.63
11,182.63
83131 11/25/2025 DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 2533437 DEC 2025 EMPLOYEE PAID DENTAL INS 11/16/2025 B 10-022-70-00 145.95
145.95
145.95
83132 11/25/2025 DUNN EDWARDS CORP 2018A48160 PAINT SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL 11/06/2025 E 10-195-245-000-000 41.30

41.30 41.30
83133 11/25/2025 EZ SUNNYDAY LANDSCAPE 9928 NOV 2025 LANDSCAPING SERVICES - PARKS, 11/17/2025 E 10-175-244-000-000 80.00
E 10-195-245-000-000 200.00
E 10-450-245-000-000 3,285.00
E 26-600-255-000-000 150.00
E 26-601-255-000-000 80.00
3,795.00
9926 OCT 2025 LANDSCAPING SERVICES - 11/17/2025
E 26-605-255-000-000 750.00
750.00
9925 NOV 2025 JADEN CT IRRIGATION 11/17/2025
E 26-605-255-000-000 150.00
150.00
4,695.00

Invoice #
Check Register

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
As of 11/30/2025
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Description Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total

NUTRITION PROGRAM

FAMILY TRUST
2ND READING
GT 2025

PHOTOCOPIER
83134 11/25/2025 FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION 10-2025-300604 OCT 2025 CDBG SENIOR CENTER 11/01/2025 E 22-425-305-000-000 1,529.43
1,529.43
1,529.43
83135 11/25/2025 FENNEMORE CRAIG PC 1325086 SEP-OCT 2025 LEGAL SERVICES FOR PETTA 11/18/2025 E 10-160-250-100-000 4,458.00
4,458.00
4,458.00
83136 11/25/2025 GRAND TERRACE CITY NEWS 19663 GT 10.30.2025 CITY AD: ORD 371 10/28/2025 E 10-172-230-000-000 187.60
187.60
187.60
83137 11/25/2025 HOLIDAY OUTDOOR DECOR INV22285 STREETLIGHT BANNERS FOR LIGHT UP 11/19/2025 E 62-120-220-000-000 4,350.00
4,350.00
4,350.00
83138 11/25/2025 INLAND BUSINESS FORMS 36299 BUSINESS CARDS - JENNIFER VICKSTROM 08/12/2025 E 65-425-220-000-000 62.34

62.34 62.34
83139 11/25/2025 KONICA MINOLTA 48064060 NOV-DEC 2025 RENT FOR (2) PHOTOCOPIERS 11/02/2025 E 10-190-700-000-000 260.32
260.32
48196433 NOV-DEC 2025 RENT FOR ADDITIONAL 11/21/2025
E 10-190-700-000-000 142.92
142.92
403.24

Invoice #
Check Register

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
As of 11/30/2025
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Description Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total

PHOTOCOPIER SERVICES

MEETING - JEFF ALLEN
FOR SA 23-21
FOR SA 25-04
FOR SA 25-06
83140 11/25/2025 KONICA MINOLTA BUS. SOLUTIONS 9010672146 10/15/2025-11/14/2025 CITYWIDE 11/14/2025 E 10-190-212-000-000 122.75
122.75
122.75
83141 11/25/2025 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 2994 REGISTRATION - OCT 2025 IE DIVISION 10/08/2025 E 10-110-270-000-000 75.00

75.00 75.00
83142 11/25/2025 LILBURN CORPORATION 25-1039 SEP-OCT 2025 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10/09/2025 B 23-515-72-00 1,742.50
1,742.50
25-1036 SEP-OCT 2025 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10/09/2025
B 23-520-09-00 1,127.50
1,127.50
25-1040 SEP-OCT 2025 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10/09/2025
B 23-520-11-00 1,127.50
1,127.50
3,997.50

Invoice #
Check Register

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
As of 11/30/2025
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Description Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total

FOR GT HEALTH CENTER

VETERAN'S FREEDOM PARK
83143 11/25/2025 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANC LCLN DEC 2025 DEC 2025 LIFE/AD&D/DEP LIFE/WI/LTD 12/01/2025 B 10-022-66-00 1,214.08
E 10-120-142-000-000 66.04
E 10-125-142-000-000 23.71
E 10-140-142-000-000 54.27
E 10-172-142-000-000 10.34
E 10-175-142-000-000 44.86
E 10-185-142-000-000 22.04
E 10-370-142-000-000 31.65
E 10-450-142-000-000 21.91
E 16-175-142-000-000 10.95
E 22-425-142-000-000 11.25
E 52-400-142-000-000 2.39
E 65-425-142-000-000 7.14
1,520.63
1,520.63
83144 11/25/2025 MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL 1267316 SEP-OCT 2025 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11/14/2025 B 23-520-20-00 3,931.25
3,931.25
3,931.25
83145 11/25/2025 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 446779696001 TISSUES FOR CITY HALL 11/07/2025 E 10-195-245-000-000 61.13

61.13 61.13
83146 11/25/2025 ON SITE COMPUTING 54004974 DEC 2025 IT SERVICES 11/01/2025 E 10-380-250-000-000 10,994.37
10,994.37
54005016 MONITOR FOR SECURITY SYSTEM AT 11/18/2025
E 10-450-245-000-000 326.80
326.80
11,321.17

Invoice #
Check Register

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
As of 11/30/2025
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Description Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total SENIOR CENTER RESERVATIONS JAN-MAR 2025
83147 11/25/2025 RUTH REMBERT 11122025 REFUND RESERVATION FEE FOR CANCELLED 11/12/2025 R 10-450-01 195.00
195.00
195.00
83148 11/25/2025 REVENUE AND COST SPECIALISTS 9370 NOV 2025 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE STUDY 11/05/2025 E 10-172-250-000-000 7,920.00
7,920.00
7,920.00
83149 11/25/2025 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 160442602-001 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL 11/07/2025 E 10-195-245-000-000 39.56

39.56 39.56
83150 11/25/2025 SPARKLING CLEAN CAR WASH INC 792 CAR WASHES FOR (5) CITY HALL VEHICLES 11/05/2025 E 10-175-272-000-000 133.00
E 10-185-272-000-000 45.00
178.00
178.00
83151 11/25/2025 SWRCB SW-0323375 FY2025-26 SWRCB SEWER PERMIT FEE 11/05/2025 E 10-625-255-000-000 10,920.00
10,920.00
10,920.00
83152 11/25/2025 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932 052 DEC 2025 EMPLOYEE PAID MEMBERSHIP DUES 11/14/2025 B 10-022-72-00 708.32
708.32
708.32

Invoice #
Check Register

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
As of 11/30/2025
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Description Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total

GRIFFIN PARK

CITY HALL

SENIOR CENTER

ROLLINS PARK

POCKET PARK

TRUNK OR TREAT
83153 11/25/2025 TERMINIX 465339780 OCT 2025 GOPHER CONTROL FOR 10/27/2025 E 10-450-245-000-000 189.00
189.00
465496966 OCT 2025 GOPHER CONTROL FOR PICO PARK 10/27/2025 E 10-450-245-000-000 158.00
158.00
465337248 OCT 2025 PEST CONTROL SERVICES - 10/27/2025
E 10-195-245-000-000 128.00
128.00
465334568 OCT 2025 PEST CONTROL SVCS FOR 10/27/2025
E 10-805-245-000-000 124.00
124.00
465339764 OCT 2025 GOPHER CONTROL FOR DOG PARK 10/27/2025 E 10-450-245-000-000 93.00

93.00 465339756 OCT 2025 GOPHER CONTROL FOR RICHARD 10/27/2025 E 10-450-245-000-000 93.00

93.00 465339788 OCT 2025 GOPHER CONTROL FOR 10/27/2025
E 10-450-245-000-000 80.00

80.00 865.00
83154 11/25/2025 UNITED RENTALS 255049200-001 LIGHT TOWER RENTALS FOR 2025 11/03/2025 E 10-120-220-200-000 542.80
542.80
542.80

Invoice #
Check Register

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
As of 11/30/2025
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Description Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total

VARIOUS DEVELOPERS
SENIOR CENTER 11/01/2025

INSURANCE
10/30/2025
83155 11/25/2025 WILLDAN 002-36313 OCT 2025 PLAN CHECKING SERVICES FOR 11/04/2025 B 23-515-55-00 405.00
B 23-520-10-00 1,147.50
B 23-520-13-00 270.00
1,822.50
1,822.50
83156 11/25/2025 MARY WILSON 11192025 REFUND RESERVATION DEPOSIT FOR 11/19/2025 B 23-515-22-00 200.00
200.00
200.00
916784 11/24/2025 AMERICAN FIDELITY ASSURANCE CO D916784 DEC 2025 - EMPLOYEE CANCER & ACCIDENT 12/01/2025 B 23-250-20-00 378.54
378.54
378.54
2509763 11/24/2025 AMERICAN FIDELITY ASSURANCE CO 2509763A DEC 2025 EMP PAID FLEX SPEND/DEP CARE 12/01/2025 B 23-250-10-00 291.65
291.65
291.65
3100009 11/06/2025 SO CA GAS COMPANY OCT 2025 GAS SERVICE OCT 2025 GAS SERVICE 11/06/2025 E 10-190-238-000-000 47.34
E 10-805-238-000-000 149.83
197.17
197.17
18058272 11/13/2025 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PAYDTE 10302025 PERS RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS FOR PAY DATE 10/30/2025 B 10-022-62-00 12,477.77
12,477.77
12,477.77

Invoice #
Check Register

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
As of 11/30/2025
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Description Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total 11/13/2025
ACH 1003040261
#1003048260
#1003048673
18091050 11/13/2025 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PAYDTE 11132025 PERS RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS FOR PAY DATE 11/13/2025 B 10-022-62-00 12,537.06
12,537.06
12,537.06
18095641 11/03/2025 CA PUB EMPLOYEES RETIRE SYSTEM 11012025 HPERS NOV 2025 PERS HEALTH INSURANCE 11/01/2025 B 10-022-61-00 3,278.13
E 10-120-142-000-000 4,102.00
E 10-125-142-000-000 1,756.63
E 10-140-142-000-000 2,585.88
E 10-172-142-000-000 927.38
E 10-175-142-000-000 3,709.52
E 10-185-142-000-000 1,854.76
E 10-190-142-000-000 5,961.87
E 10-370-142-000-000 829.25
E 10-450-142-000-000 1,854.76
E 16-175-142-000-000 927.38
E 22-425-142-000-000 829.26
E 65-425-142-000-000 927.38
29,544.20
29,544.20
18122147 11/12/2025 CALPERS 457 PLAN PAYDATE 10302025 457 EFT PAYMENT CALPERS ACH CONFIRM 10/30/2025 B 10-022-63-00 2,560.00
2,560.00
2,560.00
18122566 11/13/2025 CALPERS 457 PLAN PAYDATE 11132025 457 EFT PAYMENT CALPERS ACH CONFIRM 11/13/2025 B 10-022-63-00 2,560.00
2,560.00
2,560.00

Invoice #
Check Register

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
As of 11/30/2025
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Description Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total 32285066 11/04/2025 SO CA EDISON COMPANY OCT 2025 EDISONOCT 2025 EDISON 11/01/2025 E 10-175-238-000-000 58.68
E 10-190-238-000-000 7,609.00
E 10-450-238-000-000 3,903.84
E 16-510-238-000-000 7,689.25
E 26-600-238-000-000 78.78
E 26-601-238-000-000 64.01
E 26-602-238-000-000 88.62
E 26-603-238-000-000 14.77
E 26-604-238-000-000 69.40
E 26-605-238-000-000 55.85
E 65-425-700-000-000 49.00
19,681.20
19,681.20
108540550 11/07/2025 WEX BANK 108540550 OCT-NOV 2025 VEHICLE FUEL CHEVRON 11/06/2025 E 10-175-272-000-000 2,091.71
E 10-185-272-000-000 496.04
2,587.75
2,587.75
432470137 11/11/2025 VERIZON WIRELESS 6127336873 OCT-NOV 2025 MONTHLY PHONE CHARGES 11/01/2025 E 10-120-235-000-000 116.58
E 10-125-235-000-000 77.72
E 10-140-235-000-000 116.58
E 10-172-235-000-000 38.86
E 10-175-235-000-000 718.21
E 10-185-235-000-000 162.44
E 10-190-235-000-000 270.13
E 10-370-235-000-000 77.72
E 10-805-235-000-000 38.86
E 65-425-235-000-000 38.86
1,655.96
1,655.96

Invoice #
Check Register

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
As of 11/30/2025
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Description Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total 464009725 11/11/2025 US BANK OCT2025 CAL CARDOCT-NOV 2025 CAL CARD CHARGES 11/06/2025 E 10-110-210-000-000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 45.26
E 10-110-220-000-000 MTRLS & SUPPLIES 69.98
E 10-110-270-000-000 CONFERENCE 5,475.82
E 10-120-210-000-000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 75.44
E 10-120-220-200-000 MTRLS & SUPPLIES 3,844.33
E 10-120-270-000-000 CONFERENCE 1,685.36
E 10-125-210-000-000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 86.22
E 10-125-220-000-000 MTRLS & SUPPLIES 8.61
E 10-125-265-000-000 MTRLS & SUPPLIES 15.00
E 10-125-270-000-000 CONFERENCE -186.30
E 10-140-210-000-000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 184.24
E 10-140-220-000-000 MTRLS & SUPPLIES 29.08
E 10-140-270-000-000 CONFERENCE 1,542.35
E 10-172-270-000-000 CONFERENCE 330.00
E 10-172-272-000-000 VEHICLE MAINT 67.01
E 10-175-210-000-000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 22.46
E 10-175-218-000-000 MTRLS & SUPPLIES 13.31
E 10-175-244-000-000 MTRLS & SUPPLIES 1,486.79
E 10-175-265-000-000 MTRLS & SUPPLIES 481.54
E 10-175-270-000-000 CONFERENCE 40.41
E 10-175-272-000-000 VEHICLE MAINT 10.76
E 10-185-210-000-000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 78.59
E 10-185-250-000-000 MTRLS & SUPPLIES 190.00
E 10-190-210-000-000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 41.64
E 10-190-211-000-000 POSTAGE 114.35
E 10-190-220-000-000 MTRLS & SUPPLIES 224.45
E 10-190-272-000-000 VEHICLEMAINT 46.13
E 10-195-245-000-000 MTRLS & SUPPLIES 505.78
E 10-370-210-000-000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 50.32
E 10-370-270-000-000 CENFERENCE 250.00
E 10-450-245-000-000 MTRLS & SUPPLIES 719.38
E 10-631-255-000-000 MTRLS & SUPPLIES 1,941.19
E 10-805-210-000-000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 154.76
E 10-805-220-000-000 MTRLS & SUPPLIES 418.88
E 10-805-245-000-000 MTRLS & SUPPLIES 318.91
E 10-808-220-000-000 MTRLS & SUPPLIES 447.05
Total Checks: 321,113.76
E 62-120-220-000-000 LIGHT UP GT 168.06
20,997.16
20,997.16

Invoice #
Check Register

CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
As of 11/30/2025
Check # Date Vendor Invoice Description Inv. Date Amount Paid Check Total Christine Clayton, Finance Director
IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 37202, I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE AFORE

LISTED CHECKS FOR PAYMENT OF CITY LIABILITIES HAVE BEEN AUDITED BY ME AND ARE ACCURATE, NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE EXPENDITURES FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CITY. I FURTHER CERTIFY, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THAT THE CITY HAS AVAILABLE FUNDS FOR PAYMENT THEREOF.

This page left intentionally blank.

AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: January 13, 2026
TITLE: Adoption of the 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Nexus Study, Updated Development Impact Fees, and Introduction of an Ordinance Amending Section 4.80.010 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code
PRESENTED BY: Gregory Brown, Vice President
RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2025–26 DEVELOPMENT

IMPACT FEE (DIF) NEXUS STUDY AND ESTABLISHING UPDATED

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES AT OR BELOW THE MAXIMUM

AMOUNTS JUSTIFIED IN THE STUDY, INCLUDING A NEW LAW
ENFORCEMENT (COUNTY SHERIFF) FACILITIES FEE COMPONENT;

AND INTRODUCE AND WAIVE THE FIRST READING OF AN
ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 4.80.010 OF THE GRAND TERRACE

MUNICIPAL CODE TO REMOVE OBSOLETE FEE AMOUNTS AND

PROVIDE THAT DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULES UNDER
CHAPTER 4.80 SHALL BE ESTABLISHED BY CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION
2030 VISION STATEMENT:

This item supports the City’s 2030 Vision Goal of ensuring long-term fiscal viability by aligning development impact fees with current legal requirements so that new development funds its fair, proportional share of growth-related capital improvements, rather than shifting those costs onto existing residents and businesses.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Grand Terrace imposes Development Impact Fees (DIFs) pursuant to the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code Sections 66000 through 66025) to ensure that new development pays its fair, proportional share of the cost of growth-related public facilities. The current fee structure for several categories was last comprehensively updated in 2006 and no longer reflects the City’s facility needs, cost basis, growth projections, or the contemporary legal and documentation requirements established under AB 1600 and, more recently, Assembly Bill 602 (AB 602), which took effect on January 1, 2022. As a result, the City’s legacy fee program predates these standards, lacks the level of detail now required for fee calculation and disclosure, and includes obsolete fee amounts and formats that are not aligned with current law or practice.

To complete a comprehensive update and restore a legally defensible DIF program, the City retained Revenue & Cost Specialists (RCS) to prepare the 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report (“Nexus Study”). The Nexus Study updates the City’s fee calculations, land use and growth assumptions, growth projections, facility needs, and cost basis to reflect present service conditions and capital requirements. It applies the Mitigation Fee Act nexus methodology by documenting existing levels of service, identifying the facilities required to maintain those levels as development occurs, allocating the growth-related share of facility costs to new development, and

converting that share into maximum justified fees. The Study also provides the detailed calculation tables, cost support, and statutory findings required under AB 1600 and AB 602, including residential fees expressed on a per-square-foot basis. The Nexus Study establishes maximum legally defensible development impact fees for Law Enforcement (County Sheriff) Facilities, Street Improvements, General City Facilities, Public Use Facilities, and Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities, and includes an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) impact fee application appendix.

The Nexus Study also introduces a Law Enforcement (County Sheriff) Facilities fee to address growth-related facility needs associated with contracted Sheriff services. The intent of this fee is to fund eligible City-owned facilities and other capital improvements that support the delivery of law enforcement services. Adoption of this fee does not create or imply the formation of an independent municipal police department.

The proposed Ordinance would amend Grand Terrace Municipal Code Section 4.80.010. That section currently contains specific fee amounts adopted in 1989 and 2006 for several public facility categories. These amounts are obsolete and no longer aligned with the updated Nexus Study.

Consistent with the Mitigation Fee Act and AB 1600 implementation practice, fee schedules are adopted by resolution and supported by a current nexus study, rather than embedding specific dollar amounts directly in the Municipal Code, so that future updates can be made transparently when supported by updated documentation.

Finally, State law under the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code §§66000–66025) requires the City to prepare an Annual Development Impact Fee Report each year (Gov. Code §66006) and to review and update its DIF program and findings at least every five years to confirm the continued nexus and proportionality of the fees (Gov. Code §66001(d)). As part of this update cycle, RCS is preparing and submitting the required annual DIF report(s) and the five-year DIF review so that, upon adoption of the Nexus Study and updated fees, the City will be brought current with these statutory requirements.

Following adoption, the City will continue to prepare the Annual Development Impact Fee Report each year and complete the required five-year review and update process on an ongoing basis to maintain compliance and ensure that DIFs remain current and proportionate as conditions change.

DISCUSSION:

When new homes or businesses are built, they create more demand for City public facilities and services. Development Impact Fees (DIFs) are one-time fees paid by new development so the City can fund the capital facilities needed to serve that growth, helping maintain established service levels while ensuring that growth pays its fair, proportional share rather than shifting those costs to existing residents and businesses.

The 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report (“Nexus Study”) is based on the principle that growth creates additional demand for public facilities. As Grand Terrace grows, new homes and businesses add residents, employees, visitors, vehicles on local streets, and calls-forservice for public safety, increasing demand on City facilities. If facilities are not expanded to serve this growth, the level of service available to the community will decline, or the cost of maintaining current service levels would otherwise fall on existing residents and businesses. The Nexus Study identifies the growth expected to occur, determines the facilities needed to maintain existing service levels as growth occurs, estimates the cost of those facilities, and calculates maximum justified Development Impact Fees so new development pays its fair share of growth-related costs. The Study also establishes the maximum fee amounts the City may charge by category, and the City Council may adopt fees at or below these maximums.

The Nexus Study establishes maximum justified DIFs for five infrastructure categories: Law Enforcement (County Sheriff) Facilities, Street Improvements, General City Facilities, Public Use

Facilities, and Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities.

Law Enforcement (County Sheriff) Facilities Fee: This fee pays for growth-related facilities that support contracted Sheriff services. Eligible uses include expansion or improvement of City-owned space and related capital improvements necessary to maintain service levels as calls-for-service increase with new development. For example, if a new housing project adds residents and increases calls-for-service, this fee helps fund the City-owned Sheriff facility space and improvements needed to handle that added demand.

Street Improvements Fee: This fee addresses the growth-related demands new development places on the City’s local traffic circulation system. In this update cycle, Street Improvements requirements are limited to preparation and updates of a Circulation (Street Improvements) Master Plan, consistent with City direction, and the Study notes that future construction projects will be identified and programmed through that planning effort. For example, if a new retail store or housing project adds traffic to local streets, the Street Improvements DIF supports the Master Plan now and, once specific growth-related circulation projects are identified and nexus-supported in a future update, the fee can be applied to those improvements.

General City Facilities Fee: This fee funds growth-related improvements to City administrative and operational facilities that serve the community as a whole. Eligible uses include capital improvements that expand capacity for Citywide services as development increases demand for administrative and operational functions. For example, as new homes are built and demand increases for permitting, inspections, and related services, the fee helps fund growth-related expansion or upgrades to City facilities and supporting systems needed to maintain service levels.

Public Use Facilities Fee: This fee funds growth-related public meeting and community facility space.

Eligible uses include capital improvements that expand or provide public meeting and community space required to maintain the City’s public use facilities service standard as population and development increase. For example, as development adds residents and service population, the fee supports construction or expansion of public meeting and community space needed to serve that added demand.

Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Fee: This fee funds growth-related parkland acquisition and capacity-adding park improvements needed to maintain the City’s adopted parks level of service as development occurs. Eligible uses are limited to capital projects that add usable recreation capacity and exclude operations, routine maintenance, and like-for-like replacement that does not increase capacity. For example, when new housing adds residents, the Parks DIF can be used to acquire additional parkland and construct new or expanded park facilities to maintain the existing service level for parks. Subdivision parkland dedication and in-lieu fees under Quimby are administered separately from this Parks DIF program; where Quimby statutory findings are met, those subdivision resources may be applied to rehabilitate existing parks serving the subdivision area.

The appendices to the Nexus Study provide the technical backup and application materials that support the fee program and City Council adoption, including the Development Impact Fee Master Fee Schedule, Grand Terrace Land Use Crosswalk, Persons-Per-Household Methodology, Average Residential Unit Size Documentation, Net New Fee Application, Accessory Dwelling Unit Impact Fee Application, Public Safety Building Model Support, Quality-of-Life Cost Basis, Development Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan, and Development Feasibility Analysis.

The accompanying Resolution adopts the Nexus Study and an updated Development Impact Fee schedule that may be set at or below the maximum justified amounts identified in the Study. This provides flexibility for the City Council to consider market conditions and policy direction while ensuring that no adopted fee exceeds the legally justified maximum.

The accompanying Ordinance amends Section 4.80.010 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code to remove obsolete fee amounts and to provide that DIF schedules under Chapter 4.80 will be

established and amended by resolution of the City Council, supported by a current nexus study, consistent with the Mitigation Fee Act and current practice. The Ordinance does not itself impose or increase any DIF; it updates only the mechanism by which fee schedules are adopted.

City staff and the City’s consultant will be available at the meeting to present the Nexus Study and respond to any questions from the City Council.

OPTIONS FOR CITY COUNCIL:

Option 1: Approve the Nexus Study, Development Impact Fee schedule, Resolution, and Ordinance as recommended.

Option 2: Approve the Nexus Study, Resolution, and Ordinance with modifications, provided that any adopted fee amounts do not exceed the maximum justified amounts in the Study, and direct staff on the specific changes.

Option 3: Do not approve the proposed update at this time.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A – Draft Resolution Adopting the 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Nexus Study and Updated Development Impact Fees
Attachment B – Draft Ordinance Amending Section 4.80.010 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code Attachment C – 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Attachment D – Exhibit A: Development Impact Fee Schedule ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

Approval of the Resolution and introduction of the Ordinance is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4), because the action involves the creation of a government funding mechanism and does not commit the City to any specific capital improvement project. Any future capital projects funded in whole or in part with Development Impact Fees will be evaluated for CEQA compliance on a project-specific basis.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The adoption of the Resolution will increase DIF revenue and ensure full cost recovery.

DRAFT – FOR CITY ATTORNEY REVIEW ONLY
This draft document has been prepared by Revenue & Cost Specialists (RCS) for discussion purposes only.

It is not intended as legal advice and does not constitute a final legislative document.

All legal content is subject to review, modification, and approval by the City Attorney.

RESOLUTION NO. _______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 2025–26 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE (DIF) NEXUS STUDY;

ESTABLISHING UPDATED DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES AT OR BELOW THE MAXIMUM

AMOUNTS JUSTIFIED IN THE NEXUS STUDY, INCLUDING A NEW LAW ENFORCEMENT (COUNTY SHERIFF) FACILITIES FEE; AND DIRECTING IMPLEMENTATION CONSISTENT WITH THE MITIGATION FEE ACT AND AB-602.

WHEREAS, the City of Grand Terrace imposes development impact fees (“DIFs”) pursuant to the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code Sections 66000 through 66025) to ensure that new development funds its proportional fair share of needed public facilities; and WHEREAS, the City retained Revenue & Cost Specialists (RCS) to prepare the 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report (“Nexus Study”), which analyzes land use, growth projections, service demand factors, capital facility needs, and cost allocation methodologies and establishes the maximum legally defensible DIF amounts for various land uses; and
WHEREAS, the Nexus Study evaluates and documents the relationship between new development and the need for public facilities in the following categories: Law Enforcement (County Sheriff) Facilities, Street Improvements, General City Facilities, Public Use Facilities, and Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Nexus Study demonstrates the reasonable relationship required by the Mitigation Fee Act between: (1) the type of development and the public facilities for which the DIFs are imposed; (2) the need for the public facilities and the impacts of new development; and (3) the amount of the DIFs and the costs of the public facilities attributable to new development; and

WHEREAS, the Mitigation Fee Act allows development impact fees to be adopted by resolution, and Grand Terrace Municipal Code Chapter 4.104 provides that circulationrelated impact fee schedules may be established by resolution of the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt updated Development Impact Fees at or below the maximum levels justified in the Nexus Study, in order to balance legal defensibility, infrastructure needs, economic development, and community priorities; and WHEREAS, adopting fees in amounts that are lower than the maximum justified amounts does not affect the legal adequacy of the Nexus Study or the City’s compliance with the Mitigation Fee Act; and
WHEREAS, notice of the public meeting at which this Resolution is being considered was given in accordance with Government Code Section 66016; and WHEREAS, adoption of this Resolution is not a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4), because it involves the creation of a government funding mechanism that does not commit the City to any specific capital improvement project; and
WHEREAS, any future capital improvement projects funded in whole or in part with Development Impact Fees will be evaluated for CEQA compliance on a project-specific basis.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Adoption of Nexus Study.

The City Council hereby adopts the 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report as the technical documentation supporting the City’s Development Impact Fees and establishing the maximum justified fee amounts under the Mitigation Fee Act.

SECTION 2. Adoption of Development Impact Fee Schedule.

A. The City Council hereby adopts the Development Impact Fee schedule attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A.

B. The fees set forth in Exhibit A may be established at or below the maximum amounts justified in the Nexus Study.

C. The Development Impact Fee schedule in Exhibit A may be amended from time to time by resolution of the City Council, consistent with the Mitigation Fee Act and any updated nexus studies.

SECTION 3. Use of Funds.

A. All Development Impact Fees collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be deposited into separate accounts or funds in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act and the City’s accounting practices.

B. Revenues from each fee category shall be used exclusively for eligible growth-related capital improvements identified in the Nexus Study or any future updates thereto, including related design, engineering, right-of-way, and other eligible capital costs.

C. Nothing in this Resolution obligates the City to construct any specific capital improvement or to complete any improvement on a fixed schedule or timeline. The timing and priority of improvements shall be determined through future capital planning, budget processes, and City Council direction.

SECTION 4. Law Enforcement (County Sheriff) Facilities Fee.

A. The Development Impact Fee schedule adopted by this Resolution includes a Law Enforcement (County Sheriff) Facilities component supported by the Nexus Study.

B. Revenues from the Law Enforcement Facilities component may be used for eligible Cityowned law enforcement facilities and other capital improvements that support contracted Sheriff services, as described in the Nexus Study and any subsequent updates, consistent with the Mitigation Fee Act.

C. Adoption of the Law Enforcement Facilities fee does not create or imply any obligation to establish a standalone municipal police department or construct any particular facility.

SECTION 5. Administration and Indexing.

The City Manager, Finance Director, and Development Services Director, or their designees, are authorized to:

1. Publish and maintain the Development Impact Fee schedule adopted by this Resolution;

2. Administer collection of the fees, which shall generally occur at the time of building permit issuance unless otherwise required by law, development agreement, or separate City Council action;

3. Implement annual fee adjustments based on a recognized construction cost index or other inflationary factor approved by the City Manager, provided that no adjustment shall cause the fees to exceed the maximum amounts justified in the applicable nexus study; and

4. Take such additional administrative actions as are necessary or appropriate to implement this Resolution and ensure ongoing compliance with the Mitigation Fee Act, AB-602, and related reporting requirements.

SECTION 6. Effective Date.

This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this ____ day of __________, 2025. __________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
__________________________________

CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

__________________________________

CITY ATTORNEY

DRAFT – FOR CITY ATTORNEY REVIEW ONLY
This draft document has been prepared by Revenue & Cost Specialists (RCS) for discussion purposes only.

It is not intended as legal advice and does not constitute a final legislative document.

All legal content is subject to review, modification, and approval by the City Attorney.

ORDINANCE NO. _______

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 4.80.010 OF THE GRAND TERRACE MUNICIPAL CODE TO REMOVE

OBSOLETE FEE AMOUNTS AND PROVIDE THAT DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES SHALL BE

ESTABLISHED BY CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION CONSISTENT WITH THE MITIGATION FEE ACT.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRAND TERRACE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Findings.

The City Council of the City of Grand Terrace hereby finds and declares as follows:

A. Grand Terrace Municipal Code Chapter 4.80 currently includes specific development impact fee amounts adopted in 1989 and 2006 for various categories of public facilities, including storm drainage facilities, general facilities, public use facilities, and parkland and open space acquisition. These amounts are no longer current and do not reflect the City’s updated capital needs, cost basis, or recent nexus analysis.

B. Embedding specific fee amounts directly in the Municipal Code requires future fee updates to be accomplished only through ordinance amendments, which can be procedurally burdensome and is inconsistent with modern practice under the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code Sections 66000 through 66025).

C. The Mitigation Fee Act allows development impact fees to be adopted by resolution, provided that the fees are supported by appropriate nexus findings and that the procedural requirements of the Act are followed.

D. Grand Terrace Municipal Code Chapter 4.104, relating to circulation improvement fees, already provides that the applicable fee schedules may be established by resolution of the City Council, consistent with the Mitigation Fee Act.

E. The City has prepared and adopted the 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report, which establishes the maximum justified development impact fees for various categories of public facilities.

F. It is in the public interest to amend Section 4.80.010 to remove obsolete fee amounts and to provide that development impact fee schedules under Chapter 4.80 will be established and amended by resolution of the City Council, supported by a current nexus study and consistent with the Mitigation Fee Act.

G. This ordinance does not impose or increase any development impact fee. It solely updates the mechanism by which such fees are adopted and amended.

SECTION 2. Amendment to Section 4.80.010.

Section 4.80.010 of the Grand Terrace Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“4.80.010 – Development Impact Fees.

A. Development Impact Fees for Storm Drainage Facilities, General City Facilities, Public Use Facilities, and Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities shall be established, and may be amended from time to time, by resolution of the City Council.

B. All Development Impact Fees adopted under this Chapter shall be consistent with the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code Sections 66000 through 66025), the City’s adopted Development Impact Fee Nexus Study, and any subsequent updates thereto.

C. Revenues collected from development impact fees established under this Chapter shall be deposited into separate accounts or funds in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act and shall be expended solely for eligible capital improvements identified in the applicable nexus study, including related design, engineering, rights-of-way, and other eligible capital costs.

D. Adoption of fee schedules pursuant to this Chapter does not obligate the City to construct any specific capital improvement or to complete any improvement on a particular schedule or timeline. The timing, priority, and specific scope of improvements shall be determined through the City’s capital improvement planning and budget processes, subject to available funding and City Council direction.”
SECTION 3. California Environmental Quality Act.

The City Council finds that this ordinance is not a project for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4), because it involves the creation of a government funding mechanism and does not commit the City to any specific capital improvement project. Any future projects funded in whole or in part by development impact fees shall be subject to separate CEQA review, as applicable.

SECTION 4. Severability.

If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions might be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 5. Effective Date.

This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.

SECTION 6. Publication.

The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted in the manner required by law.

INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace on the ____ day of __________, 2025, and thereafter adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grand Terrace on the ____ day of __________, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
__________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
__________________________________

CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________

CITY ATTORNEY

Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Study
For the City of Grand Terrace, California
November 26, 2025

REVENUE & COST SPECIALISTS
1519 E. Chapman • Suite C • Fullerton, CA • 92831
November 26, 2025
Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
City of Grand Terrace
22795 Barton Road
Grand Terrace, CA 92313
RE: 2025–26 Development Impact Fee (DIF) Calculation and Nexus Study Honorable Mayor and Council Members:

The City of Grand Terrace has undertaken a comprehensive update of its Development Impact Fee (DIF) program to ensure that the cost of public facilities needed to serve growth is allocated in a fair, transparent, and legally defensible manner. This update reflects current statutory requirements— including the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code §66000 et seq.) and Assembly Bill 602 (AB602)—and modernizes the City’s fee structure by standardizing residential fees on a per–square-foot basis and extending the program to all major land use categories.

Revenue & Cost Specialists, LLC (RCS) was engaged to prepare this Nexus Study and evaluate the growth-related facility needs associated with residential and nonresidential development. The study establishes maximum justified fees across five infrastructure categories: Law Enforcement (County Sheriff), Street Improvements, General City Facilities, Public Use Facilities, and Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities. Each program applies an AB-602–compliant methodology that identifies the existing level of service, determines the portion of future capital needs attributable to new development, and distributes those costs proportionally across land uses based on measurable demand factors.

The maximum justified fees presented in this report are designed to ensure that new development funds only its fair share of growth-related facility needs, preventing existing residents and businesses from subsidizing future development. The report provides transparent calculations, clearly documented assumptions, and complete statutory findings to support City Council consideration of adopting the updated DIF program.

REVENUE & COST SPECIALISTS
1519 E. Chapman • Suite C • Fullerton, CA • 92831
RCS wishes to express its appreciation to City staff whose support and responsiveness were essential to the successful completion of this study. In particular, we acknowledge:

Gabriel Arguelles
Assistant Planner
Jessica Lambarena
Development Services Coordinator
Their assistance in providing land use data, facility information, and project direction greatly contributed to the accuracy and completeness of this Nexus Study.

The Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Study is respectfully submitted for your review and consideration. RCS remains available to support the City Council, staff, and community in understanding the fee program and its role in ensuring that Grand Terrace continues to provide essential public facilities as the community grows.

Sincerely,
Gregory Brown
Vice President
Damijon Redmond
Associate

Recommended Development Impact Fees
(Summary Table)
Recommended Development Impact Fees
Development Impact Fee Land Use Type Recommended Development Impact Fees
Single Family Detached $7.087 per SF
Multi-Family Attached $12.123 per SF
Manufactured/Mobile Homes $10.710 per SF
General Commercial $0.386 per SF
Office Commercial $0.268 per SF
Industrial $0.219 per SF

Table of Contents
Executive Summary.....................................................................................................................i Chapter 1: Introduction and Framework ....................................................................................1 Chapter 2: Data and Growth Inputs ..........................................................................................10 Chapter 3: Law Enforcement Facilities.....................................................................................19 Chapter 4: Street Improvement................................................................................................33 Chapter 5: General City Facilities.............................................................................................49 Chapter 6: Public Use Facilities ...............................................................................................64 Chapter 7: Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities.................................................................74 Appendix A: Development Impact Fee Master Fee Schedule ...................................................87 Appendix B: Grand Terrace Land Use Crosswalk......................................................................89 Appendix C: Persons-Per-Household (PPH) Methodology........................................................91 Appendix D: Average Residential Unit Size...............................................................................95 Appendix E: Net New Fee Application ......................................................................................98 Appendix F: Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Impact Fee Application .....................................102 Appendix G: Public Safety Building Model..............................................................................105 Appendix H: Quality of Life Cost Basis ...................................................................................107 Appendix I: Development Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan..........................................111 Appendix J: Development Feasibility Analysis .......................................................................119

Executive Summary
The City of Grand Terrace Development Impact Fee (DIF) Nexus Study updates and documents a citywide program for �ive infrastructure categories: Law Enforcement (County Sheriff), Street Improvements, General City Facilities, Public Use Facilities (community and public meeting space), and Parks. The update is structured to comply with the Mitigation Fee Act and Assembly Bill 602, modernize the existing fee structure, and present all residential fees on a per–square foot basis. The study’s overarching goal is to ensure that new development funds its fair, proportional share of growth-related capital costs without paying for existing de�iciencies.

The analysis is built on a parcel-based land use database and a de�ined planning horizon, measuring both existing and future development across six fee land uses: Single Family Detached, Multi-Family Attached, Manufactured/Mobile Homes, General Commercial, Of�ice Commercial, and Industrial.

Persons-per-household factors and nonresidential demand indicators, such as calls-for-service and trip-miles, are used to relate each land use to its expected use of public facilities. These measures provide a consistent way to allocate project costs so that the fee charged to each land use does not exceed the cost of facilities reasonably attributable to that development.

Across all programs, the capital improvement program identi�ied in the study totals just over $95 million in facilities and projects. After recognizing other funding sources, existing balances, and the portions of projects that serve the existing community, approximately $90 million in costs remain as growth-related and potentially eligible for DIF funding. Key elements of this program include expansion of City-owned space that supports contracted sheriff services, preparation and implementation of a Circulation Master Plan for streets and traf�ic operations, upgrades and expansion of general city buildings, yard facilities, vehicles, and equipment, additional public meeting and community space, and parkland acquisition and park improvements needed to maintain the City’s existing level of service for parks as the community builds out.

The study applies standard nexus methods tailored to each program: an existing-inventory approach for facilities like law enforcement, public use, and parks, a system-planning approach for General City Facilities, and a planned-facility or master-planning approach for street improvements. In each case, the methodology starts from the existing system, identi�ies growth-related capital needs, nets out non-fee funding, and then distributes the remaining costs across land uses using service-based demand measures. This structure is intended to be transparent and legally defensible, showing how each dollar of fee revenue is tied to speci�ic facilities and to the development that generates the need for those facilities.

From this cost basis, the study derives maximum justi�ied development impact fees stated per square foot for residential and nonresidential land uses. Commercial lodging is not included because it is not present in Grand Terrace, and institutional land uses are not treated as a separate fee category. The combined maximum justi�ied fees are highest for Multi-Family Attached and Manufactured/Mobile Homes, re�lecting higher service population per square foot, and lower for nonresidential uses, particularly Industrial. The City Council retains full discretion to adopt fees at or below these i

maximum levels, to phase in changes over time, or to provide targeted reductions or exemptions, so long as any adopted schedule remains consistent with the nexus, cost allocations, and proportionality documented in the study.
ii

Chapter 1
Introduction and Legal Framework
Purpose of the Study
The City of Grand Terrace periodically updates its Development Impact Fee (DIF) program to keep fees aligned with statutory requirements, current cost conditions, and an equitable allocation of growth across land uses. This Nexus Study provides the technical and legal basis for City Council consideration of fee changes in this update cycle.

This Nexus Study updates and documents a set of Development Impact Fees (DIFs) for �ive program areas: Law Enforcement (County Sheriff), Street Improvements, General City Facilities, Public Use Facilities (Community Centers), and Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities. For Law Enforcement, the study establishes a new fee to help fund growth’s fair share of space needs associated with contracted sheriff services. For Street Improvements, the study consolidates circulation-related planning activities into a single Street Improvements Impact Fee focused on master planning and program-level work. For General City Facilities, Public Use Facilities, and Parks, the study re�ines the existing fee structures, aligns them with current land use categories and service standards, and converts residential fees to a per square foot basis by land use as required by Assembly Bill 602 (AB602).

For Street Improvements, the study advances a single Street Improvements impact fee for this cycle by consolidating the legacy Arterial Improvement, Traf�ic Signal Improvement, and Operational Improvement components. For Facilities, the study de�ines two distinct programs, General City Facilities and Public Use Facilities, so that purposes, eligible uses, and accounting are clearly distinguished and compliant with the Mitigation Fee Act.

At present, the City assesses impact fees only on residential development. This study calculates fee schedules for both residential and non-residential land uses; whether and how to apply fees will be determined by the City Council at adoption.

Grounded in statute, current cost data, and transparent methods, this study equips the City Council to consider adopting the new Law Enforcement fee and updated fee schedules for the City’s existing programs.

Background and Context
Grand Terrace’s Development Impact Fee (DIF) program has operated for nearly two decades, beginning with a 2005–06 nexus study prepared by Revenue & Cost Specialists (RCS). The Municipal Code formalizes the circulation fee framework in Chapter 4.104 (Circulation Improvement Fee Program)—which establishes arterial, traf�ic signal, and operational components—and the chapter was comprehensively amended on February 23, 2016. Program administration is integrated with the City’s development review and capital delivery functions (Planning & Development Services; Public 1

Chapter 1 Introduction and Legal Framework
City of Grand Terrace 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Works), and current fee schedules are made available to applicants through the City’s Building & Safety pages.

Legal Authority
California law establishes the framework under which cities may adopt and update development impact fees. Two key legal authorities govern this study: the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code §§66000–66025) and Assembly Bill 602 (AB-602). Together, these statutes de�ine the requirements that must be met in order to lawfully impose development impact fees on new construction.

Mitigation Fee Act (AB-1600): The Mitigation Fee Act, originally enacted as Assembly Bill 1600 in 1987, requires that local agencies establish a reasonable relationship, or nexus, between the fees charged to new development and the facilities or improvements �inanced with those fees. The Act sets forth several key standards:
• Fees must be supported by �indings demonstrating the purpose of the fee and its use. • There must be a demonstrated connection between the type of development paying the fee and the need for the public facility.
• Fees must not exceed the proportional share of costs attributable to the development. • Fees must be deposited in separate accounts, with annual and �ive-year reporting requirements.

Assembly Bill 602 (AB-602): Adopted in 2021, AB-602 strengthens the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act by mandating greater transparency and consistency in nexus studies. Among its provisions, AB-602 requires:
• Standardized methodologies for calculating fees, including identi�ication of the population and employment assumptions used.
• Clear demonstration of how growth projections relate to infrastructure demand. • Inclusion of at least one comparison of fee levels with those in other jurisdictions. • Enhanced requirements for public review and input prior to adoption.

Application to Grand Terrace: This Nexus Study has been prepared in compliance with the Mitigation Fee Act and AB-602. It documents the relationship between new development in Grand Terrace and the need for additional public facilities, ensuring that fees are proportionate and legally defensible. The study applies standardized demographic and land use methodologies consistent with AB-602 so that all underlying assumptions are explicitly identi�ied, consistently applied, and transparent to the public. By adhering to these legal standards and applying data-driven methods, the City of Grand Terrace ensures that its updated development impact fee program both complies with state law and equitably assigns the costs of growth.
2

Chapter 1 Introduction and Legal Framework
City of Grand Terrace 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Required Legal Findings
In compliance with Government Code §66001, the nexus study must establish �ive �indings for each proposed fee:

1. Purpose of the fee

2. Use of the fee revenues

3. Relationship between the fee’s use and the development type

4. Relationship between the facility need and the development type

5. Relationship between the fee amount and the development’s share of cost If any fees remain unspent after �ive years, the City must reaf�irm these �indings or refund the unexpended balance.

Scope of the Program
This Nexus Study updates and re�ines the scope of the City of Grand Terrace’s Development Impact Fee (DIF) program. The program ensures that new development contributes an equitable share of the cost of public facilities and infrastructure required to accommodate growth.

Program Categories Included in This Update
• Law Enforcement (County Sheriff): Space and related facility needs to support contracted law-enforcement services.
• Street Improvements: Consolidation of the City’s prior Arterial Improvement, Traf�ic Signal Improvement, and Operational Improvement fee components into a single Street Improvements Impact Fee that, for this update cycle, funds circulation and street master planning, traf�ic analyses, and related program-level activities necessary to identify and program future capital projects tied to growth.
• General City Facilities: Administrative and government buildings used to carry out citywide functions (e.g., City Hall, Council Chambers, shared support spaces). • Public Use Facilities (Community Centers): Community centers and other public meeting facilities.
• Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities: Acquisition of parkland and development and improvement of neighborhood and community parks.

The scope of this program is citywide, applying to all new residential and nonresidential development within Grand Terrace.

Land Use Categories Used in This Study
• Residential: Single Family Detached, Multi-Family Attached, and Manufactured/Mobile Homes.
• Nonresidential: General Commercial, Of�ice Commercial, and Industrial. 3

Chapter 1 Introduction and Legal Framework
City of Grand Terrace 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Fee Application
• Residential — per residential square foot
• Nonresidential — per square foot
Methodological Overview
This Nexus Study applies a structured methodology to evaluate the impacts of new development on Grand Terrace’s public facilities. The analysis distinguishes between a 30-year land use database horizon used to measure the scale and distribution of ultimate growth, and a 10-year project implementation horizon used to identify and phase capital projects. This two-horizon approach keeps the demand model comprehensive while aligning the capital delivery window with realistic implementation schedules.

Land Use Database (30-Year Horizon)
The land use database re�lects existing development and potential new development over a 30-year horizon, as provided by the City for this study. This horizon is used to:
• quantify the magnitude and geographic distribution of growth, • allocate demand across residential and nonresidential land uses, and • maintain proportionality for each fee program.

It provides the long-range basis for service standards and system capacity planning without dictating near-term capital delivery timetables.

Project Implementation (10-Year Horizon)
Capital improvements are identi�ied and phased over a 10-year horizon. Ten years is the practical window to plan, fund, and deliver projects; it also produces conservative, implementable cost assumptions by focusing on projects most likely to proceed in the near term. Because development impact fees are assessed once at the time of development, aligning a 10-year delivery plan to a 30- year demand basis preserves the nexus while tying collections to achievable delivery.

If a property later converts to a different land use, it is reassessed at that time under the applicable fee program. The 30-year horizon assures the analysis captures the full facility needs of ultimate growth; the 10-year horizon ensures realistic implementation and �inancial planning.

Population & Households — Fixed Household Structure Method Population and household growth are evaluated using the Fixed Household Structure Method applied to American Community Survey (ACS) data. Household counts by residential structure type are drawn from ACS Table B25032, and population by structure type and tenure is drawn from ACS Table B25033. Because ACS reports a combined “one-unit detached or attached” population category, that population is proportionally allocated to Single-Family Detached and Multiple-Family Attached 4

Chapter 1 Introduction and Legal Framework
City of Grand Terrace 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report categories using the corresponding ACS household shares by tenure. These steps establish personsper-household (PPH) values for Single-Family Detached, Multiple-Family Attached, and Manufactured/Mobile Homes residential categories. Category-speci�ic PPH values are presented in the Demographics & Land Use chapter and applied consistently throughout the fee calculations.

Program Scoping Alignment
Project lists and eligible uses within each fee program re�lect the City’s adopted scope for this update, including that Street Improvements are limited to master plan preparation and updates for this cycle.

Other programs (e.g., General City Facilities, Public Use Facilities, and Parkland Acquisition & Park Facilities) follow the facility and cost conventions de�ined in their respective chapters.

Summary of the Structured Approach

1. Identify existing and potential development via the land use database (30-year horizon).

2. Apply demographic factors (Fixed Household Structure Method) to forecast households and population by category.

3. Determine facility demand and identify projects required to maintain service standards (10- year implementation).

4. Allocate project costs to new development via one-time impact fees, maintaining proportionality and compliance with the Mitigation Fee Act and AB-602.

This framework ensures transparency, legal compliance, and equitable cost allocation across all applicable land use types in Grand Terrace.

Nexus Methodologies: DIFs in Grand Terrace are calculated using one of three legally recognized methodologies to establish the required “reasonable relationship” between new development and the infrastructure demands it creates. Each method is selected based on the type of facility, the planning context, and the quality of available data. These methodologies align with the Impact Fee Nexus Study Template (Terner Center for Housing Innovation at UC Berkeley, 2023) and are designed to ful�ill the analytical requirements of AB-602.

Existing Inventory Method
Used for: Law Enforcement (County Sheriff); Parkland Acquisition & Park Facilities; Public Use Facilities (Community Centers)
Description: New development contributes its proportional share toward the value and service standard of existing facilities. The fee maintains the current level of service by scaling the existing inventory (e.g., park acres per 1,000 residents; community meeting space square feet per resident; law-enforcement space per resident/service population) to growth. 5

Chapter 1 Introduction and Legal Framework
City of Grand Terrace 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Application in Grand Terrace:
• Law Enforcement: Allocate the fair-share cost of existing substation/assigned space and related facility components that serve the City, maintaining the established space standard as population grows.
• Parks: Maintain the City’s existing parkland and park improvements standard (acres and developed improvements) as growth occurs; includes parkland acquisition and park facility improvements consistent with the current LOS.
• Public Use Facilities: Maintain the existing public meeting facilities standard (e.g., community center/meeting room square footage) so future development funds its proportional share to sustain that standard.

Planned Facility Method
Used for: Street Improvements — Master Plans only
Description: Fees are based on the cost of identi�ied future planning work needed to serve new development—here, limited to preparation and updates of master plans and related planning studies (no capital construction under this program in this cycle).

Application in Grand Terrace:
• Street Improvements: Fund circulation/transportation master planning activities necessary to program future capital needs tied to growth.

System Plan Method
Used for: General City Facilities
Description: A hybrid approach combining the value of existing facilities with the cost of planned improvements, ensuring both current and future development share proportionally in the systemwide cost of providing service.

Application in Grand Terrace:
• General City Facilities: Maintain and expand shared civic facilities (e.g., City Hall, Council Chambers, shared support areas) by apportioning costs between existing users and new growth, re�lecting both current inventory and planned improvements/renovations.

Net Impact Fee Application for Redevelopment and Expansions This study applies development impact fees to the net increase in residential units or nonresidential square footage, consistent with California case law. In Warmington Old Town Associates v. Tustin Uni�ied School District (101 Cal. App.4th 840), the court held that fees must re�lect the additional 6

Chapter 1 Introduction and Legal Framework
City of Grand Terrace 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report burden created by development, not the full replacement value of demolished structures. This report follows that precedent, applying fees only to the incremental impact generated by new development.

A more detailed explanation of this legal basis is provided in Appendix E.

Level of Service (LOS) and Nexus Justi�ication
This Nexus Study applies a Level of Service (LOS)–based methodology to de�ine the relationship between new development and the need for public infrastructure. Under AB-602 (Government Code §66016.5), LOS serves as both the planning threshold and the legal nexus, anchoring the technical basis for determining each land use’s fair share of capital improvement costs.

Establishing the Existing Level of Service: The �irst step in compliance with AB-602 is identifying the existing LOS for each fee program category. LOS is measured in terms of capacity, performance, or coverage and re�lects the level of infrastructure currently available to serve the existing community. This study uses quanti�iable service metrics — such as calls-for-service, trip generation, impervious surface runoff coef�icients, gallons per day of utility capacity, and facility square footage per capita — to de�ine the existing standard.

This approach is consistent with Government Code §66016.5(a)(2)(B), which requires jurisdictions to identify the existing level of service and evaluate the cost of maintaining that level for new development. Each facility type is evaluated against its baseline LOS standard to ensure that fee revenue is proportionally allocated to maintain service levels in response to demand generated by new development. This prevents both overbuilding and underfunding and ensures legal compliance with the Mitigation Fee Act and AB-602.

Fee Program–Speci�ic LOS Metrics
• Law Enforcement (County Sheriff): LOS is based on calls-for-service (CFS) generated by residential and nonresidential development. Facilities are scaled so that law-enforcement space and support areas keep pace with CFS growth and service-population needs. • Street Improvements: For this update, the program funds master plan preparation and updates only. LOS is maintained by ensuring the circulation/transportation planning basis (trip-end modeling, intersection/classification standards, and project programming) remains current and aligned with projected development. • General City Facilities: LOS is based on administrative/government facility space per service population (residents plus an employee equivalency factor). Space standards are applied to maintain citywide service capacity as population and employment increase. • Public Use Facilities: LOS is based on community-use/meeting space per resident, ensuring that new development funds its proportional share to sustain the established level of community-use space.
7

Chapter 1 Introduction and Legal Framework
City of Grand Terrace 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report • Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities: LOS is based on parkland acreage and improved recreational facilities per resident, ensuring that new residents fund the acquisition and development necessary to maintain the City’s park standard.

Together, these LOS metrics establish the required reasonable relationship by directly linking demand from new development to the facilities—and, where applicable in this cycle, the master planning work needed to maintain service levels. By identifying the existing standards and applying them consistently across all included infrastructure categories, the City of Grand Terrace ensures that development impact fees are equitable, transparent, and legally defensible.

AB-602 Compliance and Cost Allocation: This LOS-based approach is fully compliant with AB-602’s statutory requirements, which mandate that development impact fees:
• Are based on a clearly de�ined existing level of service; • Demonstrate a quanti�ied relationship between new development and facility need; • Apply proportional cost allocation to ensure equity;
• Maintain—rather than improve—LOS for new residents; and • Use transparent, data-driven methodologies to establish fee justi�ications.

By applying fee program-speci�ic LOS thresholds and linking them to measurable units of growth, this study ensures that new development funds only the share of capital improvements necessary to maintain existing service standards. This framework ensures both legal defensibility and �iscal fairness in accordance with Government Code §66016.5.

Considerations for Intergenerational Equity
In addition to the statutory nexus requirements, this study incorporates a proportional analysis to demonstrate the intergenerational equity principle that acknowledges the signi�icant capital investments the existing community has made to build and maintain Grand Terrace’s infrastructure.

Over time, residents and businesses have contributed to the development of public facilities through taxes, utility fees, and prior impact fees. These contributions have established the baseline levels of service re�lected in the City’s existing infrastructure network. To maintain fairness, the DIF program is structured to ensure that new development contributes a proportional share of costs to expand system capacity, rather than relying on the existing population to subsidize growth-related improvements.

Each fee program chapter in this report includes a benchmark comparison to the existing community’s �inancial investment in facilities. This comparison is used to demonstrate that the fees imposed on new development are consistent with what prior generations have paid to achieve the current level of service. While this proportional analysis is not a requirement under AB-602, it enhances transparency and helps demonstrate that the fee structure equitably balances the burden of infrastructure funding across generations.
8

Chapter 1 Introduction and Legal Framework
City of Grand Terrace 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Organization of the Report
The report is organized into chapters covering the analytical framework and facility-specific nexus findings, followed by appendices containing detailed supporting documentation. • Chapter 1: Introduction and Legal Framework
• Chapter 2: Demographic and Land Use Assumptions
• Chapter 3: Law Enforcement Facilities
• Chapter 4: Street Improvements
• Chapter 5: General City Facilities
• Chapter 6: Public Use Facilities
• Chapter 7: Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities
Appendices A–J: Supporting Documentation
These appendices provide the technical foundation for the study, including the master fee schedule, detailed cost estimates, capital improvement plans, legal references, per residential square foot fee schedules, and other supporting analyses required for transparency and compliance with the Mitigation Fee Act and AB-602.

Each fee program chapter includes:
• A project cost allocation table
• An impact fee calculation framework
• A benchmark comparison to the existing community’s �inancial investment in infrastructure References
Terner Center for Housing Innovation at UC Berkeley. (2023). Impact Fee Nexus Study Template.

Berkeley: California Department of Housing and Community Development.

End of Chapter
9

Chapter 2
Demographic and Land Use Assumptions
Introduction
This chapter establishes the demographic and land use assumptions that serve as the analytical foundation for Grand Terrace’s Development Impact Fee (DIF) Nexus Study. These assumptions quantify both existing conditions and the capacity for future growth, ensuring that infrastructure demands are measured against realistic development potential.

The analysis begins with Grand Terrace’s parcel-level land use database, which provides a comprehensive accounting of current development and remaining capacity under the City’s General Plan. This database captures residential, commercial, and industrial land uses, and it is designed to support proportional allocation of capital improvement costs across all development categories.

Population growth assumptions are derived from the American Community Survey (ACS) and applied through the Fixed Household Structure Method, which standardizes persons per household (PPH) values across residential categories: Single Family Detached, Multi-Family Attached and Manufactured/Mobile Homes. This framework ensures consistency with the Mitigation Fee Act and Assembly Bill 602 (AB-602), which require jurisdictions to demonstrate transparency and proportionality in impact fee calculations.

By integrating these demographic factors with Grand Terrace’s land use database, the study provides a clear, transparent basis for forecasting growth, estimating service demand, and distributing infrastructure costs. Each subsequent chapter of this report relies on the assumptions documented here to ensure that new development contributes its fair and legally defensible share of capital facility costs.

Land Use Classi�ications
Grand Terrace’s land use classi�ications form the foundation for projecting future development and allocating public facility costs in this Nexus Study. These classi�ications are grounded in the City’s General Plan Land Use Element (City of Grand Terrace, 2010) and the 6th-Cycle Housing Element (City of Grand Terrace, 2024), which de�ine residential and nonresidential designations, intensities, and development capacity.

For consistency in analysis and fee modeling, this study uses the following standardized category labels:

Residential Classi�ications
Residential development is evaluated using the Fixed Household Structure Method, with three categories applied consistently across the study:
10

Chapter 2 Demographic and Land Use Assumptions
City of Grand Terrace 2025-26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report • Single Family Detached
• Multi-Family Attached
• Manufactured/Mobile Homes
(Category-speci�ic persons-per-household values are presented in the Demographics & Land Use chapter and used throughout the fee calculations.)
Nonresidential Classi�ications
To re�lect how different uses generate facility demand, General Plan designations are standardized into three fee categories for nexus purposes:
• General Commercial Uses
• Of�ice Commercial Uses
• Industrial Uses
These standardized categories enable consistent fee-unit assignment and equitable allocation of growth-eligible project costs across Grand Terrace while aligning with the City’s adopted land use framework.

Crosswalk of Classi�ications
To maintain transparency and ensure that local land use designations are clearly tied to standardized Nexus Study categories, this study includes a crosswalk table (Appendix B). The crosswalk pairs each General Plan designation with its corresponding study category, clearly identifying how residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, and lodging uses are treated in the analysis. This appendix also documents land uses excluded from the fee program, such as agriculture and permanent open space, consistent with nexus requirements.

Summary of Existing and Potential Development
The table below summarizes both existing development and future potential for each land use type.

These �igures are based on data supplied by City staff and compiled by RCS through analysis of land use designations, zoning, and parcel-level conditions.

This comprehensive accounting of existing and future development serves as the base denominator in cost distribution for impact fee calculations, ensuring that each land use contributes proportionally to the capital infrastructure required to support anticipated growth. [This space left blank to fit the following table on one page.] 11

Chapter 2 Demographic and Land Use Assumptions
City of Grand Terrace 2025-26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Table 2-1
Summary of the Land Use Database
Land Use Database Total Existing
Development Potential Development Total Land Use Inventory Land Use Acres Units/SF Acres Units/SF Acres Units/SF
Single Family Detached 999.56 3,325 1,024 3,235 2,023 6,560 Multi-Family Attached 180.18 1,996 207 3,801 388 5,797
Manufactured/Mobile
Homes 31.57 269 1 7 33 276
General Commercial 152.85 2,361,605 165 2,519,401 318 4,881,006 Office Commercial 34.71 544,282 32 486,499 67 1,030,782 Industrial 237.50 3,103,650 147 1,922,303 385 5,025,953 Data Integrity and Source Justi�ication:

To ensure compliance with Assembly Bill 602 (AB-602) mandates for data transparency and defensible methodologies, the following principles guide the land use and demographic analysis in this study:
• Existing and Potential Development: All data has been compiled at the parcel level through Grand Terrace’s land use database, compiled and created by City staff, and reconciled with the City’s General Plan Land Use Element and the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD)–certi�ied Housing Element. This ensures accurate accounting of both existing conditions and realistic development opportunities under current entitlements and land use policies.
• Capacity Forecasts: Derived from the City staff-compiled land use database, which re�lects the City’s General Plan Land Use Element and 6th-Cycle Housing Element. Unit yields use adopted density standards and are adjusted to re�lect feasible buildout potential over the study horizon.
• Nonresidential Floor Area: Nonresidential �loor area is measured in square feet, based on the land use database. This format aligns commercial and industrial uses with how the City entitles and tracks development.

Demographic Characteristics: Persons per household (PPH) assumptions are derived using the Fixed Household Structure Method, based on American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates (Tables B25032 and B25033). This method applies standardized PPH factors separately for Single Family Detached, Multi-Family Attached, and Manufactured/Mobile Homes, ensuring proportionality and consistency with Assembly Bill 602 (AB-602).

While demographic characteristics such as population and PPH are best derived from ACS data, unit counts and land use inventories for Grand Terrace’s impact-fee modeling rely primarily on local planning documents—the General Plan Land Use Element and the 6th-Cycle Housing Element to ensure jurisdiction-speci�ic accuracy and reliability.
12

Chapter 2 Demographic and Land Use Assumptions
City of Grand Terrace 2025-26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Persons per Household (PPH) Assumptions
This section establishes the methodology for determining persons per household (PPH) by housing type to project population growth from new development and to ensure proportional fee allocation consistent with the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code §§66000–66025) and Assembly Bill 602 (AB-602). PPH assumptions rely on public demographic data integrated with local land use information and are reconciled to the City of Grand Terrace’s Housing Element to provide a transparent and defensible basis for calculations.

Methodology
PPH assumptions are derived using the Fixed Household Structure Method, which standardizes demographic factors across three categories:
• Single Family Detached
• Multi-Family Attached
• Manufactured/Mobile Home
The Fixed Household Structure Method uses American Community Survey (ACS) �ive-year estimates to determine average household size by structure type, pools owner-occupied and renter-occupied households, and reconciles the combined results against Grand Terrace’s locally adopted planning documents. This approach ensures that population-based fee calculations align with the City’s growth forecasts and the standards of AB-602.

Data Sources
The following data sources provide the foundation for Grand Terrace’s PPH assumptions:
• United States Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS) 2019–2023 �ive-year estimates, Tables B25032 and B25033, providing structure-type household counts and structure-type population totals.
• City of Grand Terrace Land Use Database, providing parcel-based unit counts to apply raw PPH values and ensure internal consistency across infrastructure chapters.

PPH Results by Housing Type
Application of the Fixed Household Structure Method to Grand Terrace’s ACS data yields the following results:
• Single Family Detached: 3.12 persons per household
• Multi-Family Attached: 2.32 persons per household
• Manufactured/Mobile Homes: 2.83 persons per household These assumptions are used consistently throughout this study to project population growth attributable to new residential development and to allocate capital facility costs proportionally. 13

Chapter 2 Demographic and Land Use Assumptions
City of Grand Terrace 2025-26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Table 2-2
Population Forecast
Residential Category PPH
Potential
Residential Units Forecast Population
Single Family Detached 3.12 3,235 10,093.20
Multi-Family Attached 2.32 3,801 8,818.32
Manufactured/Mobile Homes 2.83 7 19.81
Total 7,043 18,931.33
Methodology Summary
This chapter establishes the demographic and land use framework used throughout the City of Grand Terrace Development Impact Fee Nexus Study. The following methodological steps ensure that the analysis is transparent, consistent with statutory requirements, and tailored to Grand Terrace’s planning context:
• Land Use Database: A parcel-level database of existing and potential development compiled by City staff, re�lecting the City’s General Plan Land Use Element and the 6thCycle Housing Element. • Land Use Classi�ications: General Plan designations are consolidated into standardized categories for fee analysis:
 Residential: Single Family Detached, Multi-Family Attached, Manufactured/Mobile Homes

Nonresidential: General Commercial, Office Commercial, and Industrial • Demographic Assumptions: Persons per household are calculated using the Fixed Household Structure Method (ACS 2019–2023; Tables B25032 and B25033) for the three residential categories above. Category-speci�ic PPH values are presented in the Demographics & Land Use chapter and are applied consistently across all fee programs.
• Population Forecasting: Potential units in each residential category were multiplied by their respective PPH factors to generate raw population forecasts. These forecasts serve as the demand denominator for allocating infrastructure costs proportionally to new residential growth.
14

Chapter 2 Demographic and Land Use Assumptions
City of Grand Terrace 2025-26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report • Nonresidential Forecasting: Growth in General Commercial, Of�ice Commercial, and Industrial Uses is measured in square feet, consistent with permitting practice and fee conventions.

By integrating local land use data with standardized demographic assumptions, this methodology ensures that new development in Grand Terrace contributes its fair share of infrastructure costs, in full compliance with the Mitigation Fee Act and AB-602.

Summary of Findings
To ensure transparency and defensibility consistent with AB-602, this section summarizes how the study identi�ies capital requirements at General Plan buildout, determines the share attributable to new development, distinguishes the portion not eligible for development impact fee (DIF) �inancing, and presents the recommended fee schedules by land use. Values and schedules are derived from the City’s inventories, capital needs, and calculations documented in this report. • Land Use Database (LUDB): The database re�lects existing development and realistic potential under adopted City policies. Residential inventory is expressed in dwelling units and nonresidential inventory in building square feet. Persons-per-household (PPH) are derived using the Fixed Household Structure Method from ACS 5-year data and applied by residential category (Single Family Detached, Multi-Family Attached, Manufactured/Mobile Homes). The LUDB provides the demand basis for allocating growth-related capital costs across land uses. • Measurement Units: Unless expressly noted otherwise, residential fees are assessed per residential square foot and nonresidential fees are assessed per square foot. • Local Counts vs. ACS: Local administrative counts establish land use quantities (dwelling units and square feet). ACS data are used only for demographic ratios (PPH by residential category) under the Fixed Household Structure Method. This preserves jurisdiction-speci�ic accuracy while maintaining demographic consistency.
• Program Scope Alignment: Fee programs are structured to maintain consistent, citywide levels of service while aligning with statutory requirements and the City’s adopted policy framework. Within this study, Law Enforcement (County Sheriff), Street Improvements, General City Facilities, Public Use Facilities (Community Centers), and Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities are treated as citywide programs whose costs are allocated across standardized land use categories. Street Improvements is structured as a planning-only program in this update cycle, funding circulation and street master planning, traf�ic analyses, and related program-level activities that guide future capital investments. Law Enforcement, General City Facilities, Public Use Facilities, and Parks are structured using level-of-service (LOS)–based methods that relate facility capacity and service standards to the City’s population and employment forecasts. Fees across all programs are presented on a per square foot basis by land use, consistent with Assembly Bill 602 (AB-602) and the City’s adopted nexus methodology.
15

Chapter 2 Demographic and Land Use Assumptions
City of Grand Terrace 2025-26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report • Data Integrity & Reproducibility: The study standardizes land use labels and documents the equations used to convert residential programs to service population (PPH × dwelling units).

A uniform units convention is applied (residential and nonresidential per square foot).

Numerical presentation follows the project’s rounding policy (whole dollars for currency; integers for counts). These practices make inputs and conversions transparent, repeatable, and defensible for nexus purposes.

The detailed fee schedules by land use type and the associated capital requirements appear in subsequent chapters and tables of this report.

Capital Improvement Program, Total Requirements and Funding Allocation The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) compiles a single, citywide set of facility needs over the planning window and organizes them by fee program in this study’s scope: Law Enforcement (County Sheriff); Street Improvements; General City Facilities; Public Use Facilities; and Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities. For each program, total requirements include fee-relevant capital projects and, where applicable, the value of existing assets necessary to maintain the established level of service.

Where a program is being re-established or modernized in this update, the analysis explicitly documents how legacy fee components and project lists are being brought into a single, updated framework. For Street Improvements, the study consolidates the former Arterial Improvement, Traf�ic Signal Improvement, and Operational Improvement fees into a uni�ied Street Improvements Impact Fee focused on planning-level work. In this update cycle, Street Improvements requirements are limited to master plan preparation and updates consistent with the City’s direction, with future construction projects to be identi�ied and programmed through those planning efforts.

Funding allocation proceeds in three steps:

1. Remove non-development funding �irst. Subtract grants, restricted revenues, external contributions, and other non-fee sources identi�ied for each project/program.

2. Determine the growth share under the applicable nexus method. o Existing Inventory Method (e.g., Parks; Public Use Facilities; applicable Law Enforcement components): allocate the cost of sustaining the current level of service to new development proportionally.
o System Plan Method (e.g., General City Facilities): combine existing inventory value with planned improvements so existing and future development share proportionally. o Planned Facility (Master Plan) Method (Streets this cycle): allocate the cost of master plan preparation and updates tied to growth.

3. Carry forward the fee-eligible remainder. Distribute the fee-eligible share to land uses using the demand factors established in this study (e.g., persons-per-household, service population, or nonresidential square footage, as applicable).
16

Chapter 2 Demographic and Land Use Assumptions
City of Grand Terrace 2025-26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Fee schedules are presented as follows:
• Residential — per residential square foot
• Nonresidential — per square foot
Numerical presentation follows the project’s rounding policy: whole dollars for currency and integers for counts (dwelling units and square feet). This framework ensures transparent accounting of total requirements, clear segregation of non-fee funding, and proportional allocation of fee-eligible costs in compliance with the Mitigation Fee Act and AB-602.

Facilities are administered as two distinct programs—General City Facilities and Public Use Facilities—with separate accounting consistent with the Mitigation Fee Act; program-speci�ic methods and inventories appear in their respective chapters.

Table 2-3
Total for all DIF Projects
Infrastructure Type Total – Projects
Law Enforcement Facilities $1,383,830
Street Improvements $ 2,500,000
General City Facilities $7,236,961
Public Use Facilities $30,442,834
Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities $53,531,425
Subtotal DIF-Related Projects $95,095,049
Non-Development Generated Projects $4,936,230
Total Report Identified Projects $90,158,819
Recommended Development Impact Fees
Based on these costs and the tables presented at the end of each subsequent chapter, costs attributable to future development were derived on a per residential square foot basis for residential land uses and on a per square foot of building area basis for nonresidential land uses. Table 2-4, found at the end of this chapter, provides a summary of the recommended development impact fee tables for each type of infrastructure and land use category. The total recommended maximum development impact fees for each of the six DIF Land Use Types are summarized below. [This space left blank to fit the following table on one page.] 17

Chapter 2 Demographic and Land Use Assumptions
City of Grand Terrace 2025-26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Table 2-4
Recommended Development Impact Fees
DIF Land Use Type Recommended Development
Impact Fees
Single Family Detached $7.087 per SF
Multi-Family Attached $12.123 per SF
Manufactured/Mobile Homes $10.710 per SF
General Commercial $0.386 per SF
Office Commercial $0.268 per SF
Industrial $0.219 per SF
References
City of Grand Terrace. (2010). Land Use Element. Grand Terrace: City of Grand Terrace.

City of Grand Terrace. (2024). City of Grand Terrace Housing Element 6th Cycle. Grand Terrace: City of Grand Terrace.

TischlerBise. (2006). Development Impact Fee Study. Hemet: City of Hemet.

End of Chapter
18

Chapter 3
Law Enforcement Facilities
Purpose and Scope
Purpose: The purpose of the Law Enforcement (County Sheriff) Facilities Fee is to ensure that new development funds its proportional share of the facility space required to maintain the City of Grand Terrace’s existing level of contracted law enforcement service. The City contracts with the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department for sworn staf�ing and operations; however, the City is responsible for providing and expanding the building space necessary to accommodate the deputies and support personnel assigned to Grand Terrace. Fee revenues are therefore limited strictly to capital improvements to City-owned facilities—such as expansion or recon�iguration of the Sheriff substation space, associated support rooms, and required tenant improvements. Fees may not be used for staf�ing, equipment, vehicles, or operational costs, which remain the responsibility of the County under the contract. By funding only the growth-related expansion of City-owned law enforcement facility space, the fee ensures that Grand Terrace maintains its current level of service as residential and nonresidential development increases calls-for-service.

Scope of Improvements: The Law Enforcement Facilities Fee will fund the capital building space required to support additional sworn of�icers and staff assigned to Grand Terrace as growth occurs.

Because the City contracts with the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department for staf�ing and operations, and owns only the facility space, eligible improvements are limited to City-owned law enforcement facilities and related tenant improvements. Fee revenues may not be used for personnel costs, equipment, vehicles, or day-to-day operations.

Speci�ically, the program will support:
• Sheriff Substation and Support Space Expansion — construction, expansion, or recon�iguration of City-owned station and substation areas, including of�ices, report-writing and interview rooms, brie�ing space, evidence processing and storage areas, lockers, and other support rooms necessary to accommodate growth-related staf�ing. • Common Areas and Building Systems — shared circulation, secure entries, lobbies, restrooms, building core systems, and other �ixed improvements that are integral to housing law enforcement personnel and maintaining the City’s established level of service. • Site and Tenant Improvements — site work and tenant improvements required to place additional law enforcement facility space into service, including utility extensions, secure parking improvements, accessibility upgrades, and �ixed security features that are part of the building.

These improvements are directly tied to growth and represent the City-owned facilities necessary to sustain Grand Terrace’s existing level of contracted law enforcement service as new development occurs. Expenditures from the Law Enforcement Facilities Fee are restricted to these capital facility categories and may not be used for personnel salaries, equipment or vehicles, ongoing operations, or like-for-like replacement of existing capacity that does not increase usable facility space. 19

Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities
City of Grand Terrace 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Scope of Bene�iciaries: All residents and businesses within the City of Grand Terrace bene�it from effective law enforcement services. Law enforcement facilities support patrol, investigations, and other public safety functions that safeguard people, property, and quality of life citywide. As new residential and nonresidential development occurs, it generates additional calls-for-service and increases demand on both law enforcement staf�ing and the City-owned facility space that houses and supports those personnel. Without expansion of that facility space, growth-related demand would erode the current level of service for both new development and the existing community.

Existing residents and businesses have already contributed to Grand Terrace’s law enforcement facilities through prior public investments. The Law Enforcement Facilities Fee ensures that new development funds its proportional share of the capital improvements required to expand Cityowned law enforcement building space, so that the existing level of service is preserved while extending equivalent facility-based service to new development.

Scope of Nexus: The Law Enforcement Facilities Fee is based on the direct relationship between new development, the calls-for-service that it generates, and the City-owned law enforcement facility space required to accommodate that demand. As new residential units and nonresidential �loor area are developed in Grand Terrace, they generate additional calls-for-service, which increases the workload on law enforcement personnel serving the City and the demand on the building space that houses and supports those personnel. Maintaining the existing level of service requires that this growth be matched with proportional increases in City-owned facility capacity so that staff can be accommodated without diluting service to existing development.

Calls-for-service are used as the measure of demand because they provide a transparent and quanti�iable link between land use types and the level of law enforcement service required. Callgeneration rates by land use are applied to the City’s growth forecasts to project the increase in future service demand attributable to new development. This growth-related demand is then translated into the incremental law enforcement facility space needed to maintain the existing level of service.

Because neither the City nor its law enforcement provider was able to provide a complete, land–use– coded calls-for-service history for Grand Terrace, the study applies benchmark call-generation rates developed from multiple comparable California cities where RCS has completed similar law enforcement nexus studies. Those benchmark datasets include only calls that could be attributed to fee-bearing land uses in those jurisdictions and were normalized for population, land use mix, and service model. Applying these standardized benchmarks to Grand Terrace’s adopted land use and growth assumptions provides a reasonable and conservative proxy for local call behavior in the absence of complete City-speci�ic data, while preserving a clear nexus between development and facility demand.

By apportioning the cost of new City-owned law enforcement facility space in direct proportion to growth-related calls-for-service, the Law Enforcement Facilities Fee ensures that each type of development funds only its fair share of the capital facilities needed to serve it. 20

Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities
City of Grand Terrace 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Table 3-1
Existing Calls-for-Service
Land Use Units/SF Existing Callsfor-Service
Call Generation
Rate
Single Family Detached 3,325 3,441 1.035
Multi-Family Attached 1,996 2,309 1.157
Manufactured/Mobile Homes 269 207 0.770
General Commercial 2,361,605 3,339 1.414
Office Commercial 544,282 543 0.998
Industrial 3,103,650 1,487 0.479
Total - 11,326 -
Note: For nonresidential categories, calls-for-service generation rates are expressed per 1,000 square feet (KSF); quantities are shown in total square feet (SF).

Existing System
Background: The City of Grand Terrace provides local law enforcement through a contract with the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department rather than operating its own municipal police department. Grand Terrace incorporated as a city in 1978 and is served by the Sheriff’s Central Station, the department’s longest-standing patrol division, which also provides contract law enforcement to other nearby communities. The contract model delivers full-service patrol, traf�ic enforcement, investigations, and related public safety functions for the community, while the City remains responsible for providing and maintaining the facility space that houses assigned personnel.

Public descriptions of Grand Terrace emphasize its reputation as a safe community with one of the lowest crime rates in the area, re�lecting the combined impact of local policing, community programs, and the City’s small-town setting. Further details on the City-owned law enforcement facility space and the existing level of service appear in the following Assets and Infrastructure and Level of Service subsections.

Assets and Infrastructure: The City of Grand Terrace’s law enforcement facilities consist of Cityowned building space that houses the personnel assigned to serve the community. Law enforcement operations are accommodated within Grand Terrace City Hall, located at 22795 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA 92313, where the City dedicates approximately 2,240 square feet of interior space for Sheriff’s station functions. This space provides of�ices and work areas for patrol and support staff, report preparation, storage, and other essential functions that enable day-to-day law enforcement service at the City’s established level of service.
21

Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities
City of Grand Terrace 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Under the City’s contract model, vehicles, equipment, and other operational resources are provided and managed by the law enforcement provider rather than owned directly by the City. As a result, the capital infrastructure relevant for this fee program is limited to the City-owned building space and related tenant improvements that house law enforcement personnel. This existing facility space forms the basis for the level-of-service analysis and the sizing of future building capacity needed to serve growth.

Existing Financial Commitment: The value of Grand Terrace’s current law enforcement facilities can be expressed in terms of the replacement cost of the City-owned building space that houses law enforcement personnel. As noted above, the City dedicates approximately 2,240 square feet of City Hall for law enforcement use. Applying the Public Safety Building Model construction cost of $530 per square foot in 2025 dollars results in an estimated replacement value of $1,187,200 for this space (2,240 square feet × $530 per square foot). The Public Safety Building Model provides the standardized construction cost basis for public safety facilities and is documented in Appendix G (Public Safety Building Model) for this study.

This planning-level replacement value represents the equity in law enforcement facility capacity that has been funded by existing residents and businesses through past taxes, assessments, and other local revenues. It does not include a separate land component because the law enforcement space is housed within the existing City Hall site, nor does it include vehicles or of�icer equipment, which are provided and managed by the law enforcement provider under the City’s contract. Calculations are performed at full precision in the model; values are displayed to whole dollars for publication.

Although the Sheriff’s workspace is housed within City Hall, law-enforcement functions require enhanced security, structural, and mechanical systems that exceed general civic of�ice standards.

Accordingly, the Public Safety Building Model is used as the construction-cost basis for valuing both existing and future law enforcement facility space, consistent with Mitigation Fee Act requirements to use the cost of the actual facility type required to serve development.

Level of Service: The City of Grand Terrace’s existing level of service for law enforcement facilities is measured by the relationship between calls-for-service generated by development and the Cityowned building space that houses law enforcement personnel. Under the City’s contract model, sworn staf�ing, vehicles, and equipment are provided and managed by the law enforcement provider, while Grand Terrace is responsible for supplying and maintaining the facility space needed to support those personnel.

The City currently dedicates approximately 2,240 square feet within City Hall to law enforcement functions. This space accommodates day-to-day operations for the personnel assigned to Grand Terrace and represents the facility capacity that supports the community’s existing level of service.

For nexus purposes, this 2,240 square feet of City-owned law enforcement space is treated as the baseline facility standard for the community.

Because neither the City nor its law enforcement provider was able to furnish a complete, land–use– coded calls-for-service history for Grand Terrace, the workload side of the level-of-service framework is based on benchmark calls-for-service generation rates developed from comparable California cities where detailed datasets were available. Those benchmarks, applied to Grand Terrace’s adopted land 22

Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities
City of Grand Terrace 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report use and growth assumptions, de�ine the growth-related calls-for-service that must be accommodated over the planning horizon. The Law Enforcement Facilities Fee is structured so that new development funds the expansion of City-owned facility space necessary to house the staf�ing implied by that benchmark demand, thereby maintaining today’s level of service for both existing and new development while limiting the program strictly to buildings and �ixed improvements the City owns.

Growth and Demand
Growth Inputs: Growth inputs represent the development capacity identi�ied in the City’s adopted land use database. Residential capacity is measured in dwelling units, and nonresidential capacity is measured in square feet of building area. These inputs provide the foundation for estimating future calls-for-service by assigning benchmark call-generation rates to each land use category. Applying those rates to the City’s projected development yields the growth-related workload that must be accommodated within the City-owned law enforcement facility system. This ensures that the demand attributed to new development is allocated proportionally across land uses for purposes of the nexus analysis.

Method: The nexus analysis relies on calls-for-service as the measure of law enforcement demand.

Calls-for-service provide a transparent and quanti�iable way to link land use types to law enforcement workload and to project the additional facility demand created by new development. Because Grand Terrace and its law enforcement provider were unable to provide a complete, land–use–coded callsfor-service history, the analysis applies benchmark call-generation rates developed from multiple comparable California cities where detailed calls-for-service datasets were available. These benchmark rates include only calls that could be attributed to fee-bearing land use categories in those jurisdictions and were normalized for differences in population, land use mix, and contract law enforcement structure.

The benchmark call-generation rates are applied to the City’s adopted land use database to estimate the ongoing calls-for-service expected from each land use category. For residential development, rates are expressed on a per-dwelling-unit basis. For nonresidential development, rates are expressed per 1,000 square feet (KSF) of building area; inventories are maintained in square feet (SF) and converted to KSF by dividing SF by 1,000 when applying the rates. This ensures consistency with the adopted fee units, which are presented in dollars per square foot.

By applying the benchmark call-generation rates to Grand Terrace’s projected growth in dwelling units and nonresidential building area, the analysis estimates the incremental calls-for-service attributable to new development. These projected growth-related calls-for-service establish the demand that new development places on City-owned law enforcement facility space and form the basis for sizing the additional facility capacity needed to maintain the City’s existing level of service as growth occurs. The results of this calculation are presented in Table 3-2, Growth-Related Calls-forService, which shows the projected calls-for-service by land use category using this benchmark-based methodology.
23

Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities
City of Grand Terrace 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Table 3-2
Growth-Related Calls-for-Service
Land Use Units/SF
GrowthRelated Callsfor-Service
Call Generation
Rate
Single Family Detached 3,235 3,348 1.035
Multi-Family Attached 3,801 4,398 1.157
Manufactured/Mobile Homes 7 5 0.77
General Commercial 2,519,401 3,562 1.414
Office Commercial 486,499 486 0.998
Industrial 1,922,303 921 0.479
Total - 12,720
Note: For nonresidential categories, calls-for-service generation rates are expressed per 1,000 square feet (KSF); quantities are shown in total square feet (SF). Adopted fee schedules are presented in dollars per square foot.

Resulting Service Demand: Application of benchmark call-generation rates to the City’s projected growth in residential and nonresidential development results in approximately 12,720 additional calls-for-service per year at buildout. These growth-related calls are the additional workload expected from new development identi�ied in the land use database. When added to the benchmark estimate of today’s land use–assignable calls-for-service (about 11,326 per year), total calls attributable to development at buildout are on the order of 24,046 per year. This represents an increase in demand of approximately 112% over the current benchmark workload.

To preserve the City’s established level of service, the facility system must be expanded so that Cityowned law enforcement building space remains adequate to house and support the personnel needed to handle this higher call volume. In this study, the growth-related calls-for-service identi�ied in Table 3-2 are used to size the additional City-owned facility capacity required to maintain Grand Terrace’s existing level of service for both existing and new development, with the resulting capital program described in the following sections.

Capacity Implications: The increase of approximately 12,720 calls-for-service attributable to new development represents a substantial addition to the workload that must be supported by Grand Terrace’s City-owned law enforcement facility space. Under existing conditions, about 2,240 square feet of City Hall is dedicated to law enforcement uses to serve a benchmark estimate of roughly 11,326 land use–assignable calls-for-service per year. This relationship establishes the City’s facility-based level of service in terms of building square footage per annual calls-for-service. 24

Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities
City of Grand Terrace 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Applying this facility standard to the projected 12,720 growth-related calls-for-service indicates a need for additional City-owned law enforcement building space on the order of a few thousand square feet to maintain the existing level of service at buildout. In this study, that requirement is translated into a speci�ic capital project that provides approximately 2,611 square feet of new law enforcement facility capacity. This growth-related expansion forms the basis for the Law Enforcement Facilities Fee capital program and de�ines the additional City-owned building space needed to preserve the City’s existing level of service as development occurs.

Allocation by Land Use: The cost of providing new law enforcement facilities must be distributed across land use categories in proportion to the demand they generate. Applying benchmark callgeneration rates to the City’s adopted land use database results in 12,720 growth-related calls-forservice at buildout, allocated as follows:
• Single Family Detached — 3,348 calls (26.32%)
• Multi-Family Attached — 4,398 calls (34.57%)
• Manufactured/Mobile Homes — 5 calls (0.04%)
• General Commercial — 3,562 calls (28.01%)
• Of�ice Commercial — 486 calls (3.82%)
• Industrial — 921 calls (7.24%)
This distribution shows that Multi-Family Attached, Single Family Detached, and General Commercial account for the largest shares of future law enforcement demand, with smaller contributions from Industrial, Of�ice Commercial, and Manufactured/Mobile Homes. Costs for new City-owned law enforcement facility space are apportioned in direct proportion to these call shares so that no land use is charged more than the demand it creates while maintaining the City’s established level of service.

Capacity Sizing and Capital Program: The preceding analysis indicates that growth in Grand Terrace will generate approximately 12,720 additional calls-for-service at buildout. To maintain the City’s existing facility-based level of service, this workload requires the expansion of City-owned law enforcement building space so that personnel assigned to Grand Terrace can continue to be housed and supported adequately. Applying the existing relationship between City-owned facility space and calls-for-service to the projected growth-related calls results in a need for approximately 2,611 square feet of additional law enforcement space within the City.

These requirements translate into a single, focused capital project to expand the City’s law enforcement facilities in proportion to growth. The Law Enforcement Facilities Fee program, therefore, includes one project, Police Station Expansion (Project LE-001), which provides approximately 2,611 square feet of new City-owned law enforcement building capacity at a planninglevel cost of $1,383,830 in 2025 dollars. This project forms the capital program for the fee and de�ines the additional City-owned facility space needed to preserve the City’s existing level of service as development occurs.
25

Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities
City of Grand Terrace 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Law Enforcement Projects
Project ID: LE-001
Project Title: Sheriff Station Space Expansion
Description: This project expands City-owned law enforcement building space to accommodate the growth-related calls-for-service generated by new development in Grand Terrace. The scope includes planning, design, permitting, and construction or recon�iguration of interior space within City Hall or another City-owned facility to increase the area dedicated to law enforcement functions. The expansion may be delivered through recon�iguration of existing City Hall space to create more ef�icient of�ice and support areas for law enforcement personnel, construction of an addition to City Hall, or construction of a comparable City-owned facility that provides equivalent law enforcement space. The project is necessary to provide the 2,611 square feet of new building capacity identi�ied in the growth analysis, ensuring that the City’s established level of service is maintained as development occurs.

Size/Scope: 2,611 square feet (growth-related building expansion) Location: To be determined
New Development Share: 100%–$1,383,830 (funded through Law Enforcement Facilities Impact Fees)
Existing Community Share: 0%–$0 (non-growth cost, funded from other sources) Total Cost: $1,383,830
Timing: 2026–2036
Cost Basis and Estimating Assumptions
RCS uses a single Public Safety Building Model (a consistent $/SF basis) to estimate law enforcement facility construction costs. Although Grand Terrace’s law enforcement space is located within City Hall, law enforcement functions require security, code-driven systems, and mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) intensity that exceed typical civic of�ice standards. Using one model for public-safety buildings keeps the analysis apples-to-apples and re�lects these higher requirements. For law enforcement facilities, the baseline is construction-only (no land), since projects frequently proceed as remodels, interior recon�igurations, expansions, or adaptive reuse where site control already exists; if a project requires new land, that cost can be documented separately on a case-by-case basis.

For this study, the Public Safety Building Model establishes a planning-level construction cost of $530 per square foot in 2025 dollars for law enforcement facility space. The detailed cost breakdown and supporting materials are provided in Appendix G, Public Safety Building Model. 26

Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities
City of Grand Terrace 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Allocation of Project Costs
The total cost of the Law Enforcement Facilities capital program is $1,383,830, representing the growth-related law enforcement facility expansion identi�ied as Project LE-001. There is no existing Law Enforcement Facilities development impact fee fund balance available to offset this program, so the net revenue requirement is $1,383,830. To ensure fairness and proportionality, the net costs are allocated to land use categories in direct proportion to their shares of the 12,720 growth-related callsfor-service identi�ied in the growth analysis (Table 3-2). Using calls-for-service as the allocation basis ensures that each type of development funds its fair share of City-owned law enforcement facility space in accordance with the demand it creates.

Derivation of Maximum Justi�ied Fees
The maximum justi�ied Law Enforcement Facilities Fees are derived by dividing the allocated capital program costs for each land use category by the corresponding measure of new development. For residential categories, fees are expressed on a per residential square foot basis. Average dwelling unit sizes are applied to projected new units to establish total new residential �loor area, and allocated costs are divided by this �loor area to calculate the fee in dollars per square foot, consistent with the requirements of Assembly Bill 602 (AB-602).

For nonresidential categories, calls-for-service are measured on a per 1,000 square foot basis in order to estimate demand. This convention ensures consistency when applying call-generation rates to large �loor area categories. However, when fees are calculated, the allocated costs are divided by the total square footage of new �loor area, not by units of 1,000 square feet. This conversion ensures that the resulting fee schedule is stated in dollars per square foot, consistent with residential categories and AB-602 requirements.

All calculations are performed using unrounded �igures to maintain accuracy. Rounding is applied only when presenting the fee schedule for adoption. The City Council may adopt fees at or below the maximum justi�ied amounts shown.

The following table presents the allocation of project costs by land use category and the resulting maximum justi�ied fees for the Law Enforcement Facilities program. [This space left blank to fit the following table on one page.] 27

Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities
City of Grand Terrace 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Table 3-3
Allocation of Development Cost per Land Use
Land Use
GrowthRelated
Calls-forService
Percentage
of GrowthRelated
Calls-forService
Allocation
of
Expansion
Costs
Development
Impact Fee
Per SF/Room
Single Family Detached 3,348 26.32% $364,235 $0.058/SF
Multi-Family Attached 4,398 34.58% $478,466 $0.155/SF
Manufactured/Mobile Homes 5 0.04% $544 $0.069/SF
General Commercial 3,562 28.00% $387,516 $0.154/SF
Office Commercial 486 3.82% $52,873 $0.109/SF
Industrial 921 7.24% $100,197 $0.052/SF
Total 12,720 100.00% $1,383,830 -
Existing Community Financial Commitment Comparison
The Mitigation Fee Act requires impact fee programs to account for existing funding so new development pays no more than its fair share. For law enforcement facilities in Grand Terrace, there is currently no dedicated Law Enforcement Facilities development impact fee fund balance to recognize in this program. Instead, the existing community’s equity is embodied in the City-owned building space within City Hall that is dedicated to law enforcement functions. As described earlier, this space totals approximately 2,240 square feet and has a planning-level replacement value of $1,187,200 in 2025 dollars based on the Public Safety Building Model construction cost.

This existing community �inancial commitment has been allocated to land use categories using the same calls-for-service–based methodology applied in the development impact fee calculation. By applying consistent measures of demand and cost allocation, the analysis allows for a direct, applesto-apples comparison between the contribution already made by the existing community and the investment required from new development to maintain the established level of service.

This consistency ensures transparency and defensibility, demonstrating that the fee program does not impose a disproportionate burden on new development but instead aligns future contributions with the standard established by the existing community. The following table presents the allocation of the existing facility replacement value by land use category and the resulting existing �inancial commitment per square foot.
28

Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities
City of Grand Terrace 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Table 3-4
Allocation of Existing Cost per Land Use
Land Use
Existing
Calls-forService
Percentage of
Existing
Calls-forService
Allocation of
Existing Costs
Existing
Financial
Commitment
Per SF/Room
Single Family Detached 3,441 30.38% $360,688 $0.062/SF
Multi-Family Attached 2,309 20.39% $242,031 $0.150/SF
Manufactured/Mobile Homes 207 1.83% $21,698 $0.068/SF
General Commercial 3,339 29.48% $349,997 $0.148/SF
Office Commercial 543 4.79% $56,918 $0.105/SF
Industrial 1,487 13.13% $155,868 $0.474/SF
Total 11,326 100.00% $1,187,200 -
Fee Schedule and Summary
The following table presents the maximum justi�ied Law Enforcement Facilities Fees for the City of Grand Terrace. These fees are derived from the proportional allocation of the $1,383,830 law enforcement facilities capital program to land use categories based on their shares of the 12,720 growth-related calls-for-service identi�ied in this chapter. The schedule below presents the maximum justi�ied fees; all land uses are shown in dollars per square foot, consistent with Assembly Bill 602 (AB-602) requirements and the City’s adopted land use framework.

The maximum justi�ied fees represent the highest defensible fee levels supported by this study. The City Council retains the discretion to adopt fees at or below these levels as a matter of policy. [This space left blank to fit the following table on one page.] 29

Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities
City of Grand Terrace 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report Table 3-5
Summary of Proposed Development Impact Fees
Land Use Per SF/Room
Single Family Detached $0.058/SF
Multi-Family Attached $0.155/SF
Manufactured/Mobile Homes $0.069/SF
General Commercial $0.154/SF
Office Commercial $0.109/SF
Industrial $0.052/SF
Current Law Enforcement Facilities Development Impact Fees The City of Grand Terrace does not currently maintain a law enforcement facilities development impact fee program. As a result, there is no existing fee schedule in place for law enforcement facilities. The maximum justi�ied fees presented in this chapter, therefore, represent the �irst fees calculated for this purpose.

Five Findings
In accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act, the following �indings support the imposition of the Law Enforcement Facilities Impact Fee:

1. Purpose of the Fee
The purpose of the fee is to fund the expansion of City-owned law enforcement facilities necessary to maintain the City’s established level of service as new development generates additional calls-for-service. The fee ensures that growth �inances its proportional share of the building space and �ixed improvements needed to house and support law enforcement personnel serving Grand Terrace.

2. Use of the Fee
Fee revenues will be used to �inance the planning, design, permitting, construction, and expansion of City-owned law enforcement facility space, including associated tenant and site improvements that place new space into service. Eligible uses include remodels, interior recon�igurations, additions, or construction of new City-owned building space dedicated to 30

Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities
City of Grand Terrace 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report law enforcement functions, as identi�ied in this study. Fee revenues will not be used for staf�ing, vehicles, of�icer equipment, or ongoing operations.

3. Relationship Between the Fee’s Use and the Type of Development New residential and nonresidential development generates additional calls-for-service, which increase the workload on law enforcement personnel serving Grand Terrace and the demand on City-owned facility space that houses and supports those personnel. Fee revenues will be used to expand law enforcement facility capacity so that the building system can continue to support this higher demand at the City’s established level of service.

4. Relationship Between the Need for Facilities and the Type of Development The need for expanded law enforcement facilities arises directly from the calls-for-service generated by new development in each land use category. By using calls-for-service as the measure of demand and applying benchmark call-generation rates to the City’s adopted land use database, the study identi�ies the growth-related calls-for-service attributable to each land use. The additional law enforcement facility space funded by the fee is sized to accommodate this growth-related demand, ensuring that each land use category contributes in proportion to the need it creates.

5. Relationship Between the Amount of the Fee and the Cost Attributable to Development
The amount of the fee is calculated by dividing each land use category’s allocated share of the $1,383,830 law enforcement facilities capital program by its measure of new development, resulting in a fee stated in dollars per square foot. This allocation is based on each category’s share of growth-related calls-for-service, ensuring that no land use is charged more than its proportional share of the cost of City-owned law enforcement facility space needed to serve growth.

Implementation and Compliance Notes
Adoption and Program Structure: The City will adopt the Law Enforcement Facilities development impact fee (DIF) by Council action after adopting the supporting nexus study. The City will be responsible for imposing, collecting, and administering the fee. Revenues are restricted to eligible law enforcement facilities and improvements identi�ied in this study, including expansion, remodel, or construction of City-owned building space used for law enforcement functions and associated tenant and site improvements that place additional space into service.

Fund Accounting and Reporting: A separate Law Enforcement Facilities DIF fund/account will be established and maintained. All fee revenues (and interest) will be deposited into this account and expended only for the purposes identi�ied in this study. The City will publish the annual AB-1600 report (Government Code §§66000–66025) and make the �ive-year �indings for any unexpended balance (Government Code §66001(d)). Any existing fund balance will be carried forward within this 31

Chapter 3 Law Enforcement Facilities
City of Grand Terrace 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report account and restricted to eligible, growth-related capital uses identi�ied herein. If the City cannot make the required �ive-year �indings, any remaining balances must be refunded as provided by law.

Administration and Schedule Management: Fees are due at the time of building permit issuance.

The fee schedule shall be indexed annually to an appropriate construction-cost index such as the Engineering News-Record (ENR) Construction Cost Index. The City will maintain a public, up-to-date fee schedule and post the nexus study and schedule on its website for transparency.

Use of Funds (Eligibility): Expenditures are limited to the growth-related share of projects that add law enforcement facility capacity. Eligible uses include planning, land acquisition (if needed), design, permitting, construction, remodel, interior recon�iguration, and expansion of City-owned building space dedicated to law enforcement functions, together with related �ixed improvements and security features that are part of the building. Expenditures for like-for-like replacements that do not add capacity, or for staf�ing, vehicles, equipment, or general law enforcement operating costs, are not eligible.

Program Applicability: Fees apply to net new development (additions minus removals) as de�ined in this study. The City may program Law Enforcement Facilities DIF revenues anywhere within the city where a listed project maintains the established level of service for the community.

End of Chapter
32

Chapter 4
Street Improvements
Purpose and Scope
Purpose: The purpose of this chapter is to establish and implement the City of Grand Terrace’s Street Improvements impact fee by setting maximum justi�ied fees and administrative provisions consistent with the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code § 66000 et seq.) and Assembly Bill 602 (AB-602). This update aligns the methodology and presentation with current statutory requirements and ensures the program remains defensible and auditable.

Grand Terrace’s transportation system, including its streets, intersections, signals, and access/egress facilities, serves existing residents and businesses as well as new development. Without continued investment and planning, the additional trip demand generated by growth would erode the performance of the City’s mobility network, resulting in unacceptable congestion and diminished level of service (LOS).

For this cycle, the program funds circulation planning activities (e.g., master plan preparation and updates, traf�ic studies, network modeling, and related planning/engineering) necessary to maintain mobility standards and program future capital improvements. If the City later adds eligible capital projects, the same trip-based methodology will be applied to size and allocate costs proportionally to growth.

This chapter recognizes the integrated nature of the City’s transportation network and supports an interconnected system consistent with the City’s General Plan and Circulation Element. The program is structured to balance equity between existing and future users, maintain mobility standards across the City, and ensure that growth contributes proportionally to the infrastructure planning and improvements necessary to sustain the City’s adopted LOS.

This update consolidates the prior Arterial Improvement, Traf�ic Signal Improvement, and Operational Improvement fee components into a single Street Improvements Impact Fee and provides one program framework and fund for planning and, when programmed in later cycles, eligible capacity/operations improvements.

Scope of Improvements: For this update, the Street Improvements program for the City of Grand Terrace is limited to planning activities necessary to maintain mobility standards and prepare/program future capital needs. Eligible planning uses include master plan preparation and updates, traf�ic impact and warrant studies, travel-demand modeling, corridor and complete-streets planning, intersection control evaluations, access management studies, and related engineering needed to de�ine, phase, and document future capacity and safety projects attributable to growth. The program excludes operations, routine maintenance, and stand-alone recreational amenities not functionally tied to the street network.

Before any capacity-increasing improvement is programmed for fee funding, the City will �irst complete and adopt the necessary planning documentation; the improvement will be identi�ied in an 33

Chapter 4 Street Improvements
City of Grand Terrace 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report adopted street planning document and supported by current technical analyses (including trip generation and operational or safety �indings) with clear nexus and proportionality determinations consistent with the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code § 66000 et seq.) and Assembly Bill 602 (AB602). Consistency with the General Plan will be documented through project adoption and Planning Commission review under Government Code § 65401, ensuring projects are data-driven, right-sized to growth, and defensible prior to design or construction.

If the City later adds eligible capital projects to this program, costs will be sized and allocated using the trip-based methodology described in this chapter; at a high level, potential categories may include street widenings and extensions, intersection and signal upgrades, access and egress improvements, systemwide safety and operations upgrades, sidewalks and pedestrian lighting when part of eligible corridor or intersection work, and bridges or structures where needed to maintain network connectivity.

Consistent with this consolidation, Street Improvements fee revenues will be deposited into one Street Improvement Fund, replacing the prior separate Arterial, Traf�ic Signal, and Operational fee accounts.

Scope of Bene�iciaries: The Street Improvements program provides systemwide bene�its to both existing and new development in Grand Terrace. Planning activities, and any future capacity and operations improvements such as street widenings, intersection and signal upgrades, corridor safety and operations elements, and structures necessary for connectivity, enhance the ef�iciency and safety of the City’s street network for all users.

Financial responsibility is assigned to growth because new development introduces additional trip demand that creates the need to plan and, when programmed in future cycles, construct added capacity. Existing development has already contributed to today’s system through prior public investments and previously collected impact fees. To maintain equity and proportionality under the Mitigation Fee Act and AB-602, the program allocates eligible costs to new development in proportion to the trip demand it generates, using the trip-based methodology described in this chapter.

For consistency with prior chapters, bene�iciaries are organized by the same adopted land use categories used throughout this report. The fee distribution follows those categories without restating them here, ensuring proportionality while avoiding redundancy.

Scope of Nexus: The Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code § 66000 et seq.) requires a reasonable relationship (nexus) between new development and the public facilities funded through development impact fees. For Street Improvements, this relationship is demonstrated by linking the additional vehicle trips generated by new development to the planning and, when programmed in later cycles, capacity and operations improvements needed to accommodate those trips while maintaining the City’s adopted mobility standards under Assembly Bill 602 (AB-602).

In Grand Terrace, the Street Improvements program measures this nexus by converting growth in development to trip-based demand and using that demand to size the program’s growth share. In this update, the fee funds planning activities, including master plan preparation and updates, technical analyses, and project programming, that are necessary precursors to any future capacity-increasing 34

Chapter 4 Street Improvements
City of Grand Terrace 2025–26 Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report projects. As new residential and nonresidential development occurs, it generates additional trips that would otherwise contribute to congestion; the program ensures the City has the data, analysis, and adopted plans needed to identify, phase, and justify the improvements attributable to that growth.

While existing residents and businesses also bene�it from a well-planned, safe, and ef�icient street network, they have contributed to the current system through prior public investments and earlier fee programs. The fee is structured so that growth pays in proportion to the trip demand it creates, preserving equity between existing and future users.

The total program cost is divided between existing and new development based on measurable indicators of travel demand derived from the land use forecast (for planning in this cycle, and for speci�ic capital projects in future cycles). New development’s cost share is then allocated to land use categories in proportion to their relative trip generation characteristics. The detailed methodology used to quantify trip demand and to allocate costs is presented later in this chapter.

Through this structure, the Street Improvements program demonstrates the required nexus between new development and the transportation planning and improvements that serve it, ensuring fees remain proportionate, defensible, and compliant with the Mitigation Fee Act and AB-602.

Existing Facilities
Asset and Infrastructure: The City of Grand Terrace maintains a street network that provides mobility for residents, businesses, and visitors. The system consists primarily of arterials and collectors, together with signalized intersections and other intersection control devices, corridor lighting, and related safety elements. These facilities constitute the baseline network that must be sustained as the community grows.

Within the local street network, the current inventory identi�ies 2.66 miles of arterials, 11.36 miles of collectors, and 1.90 miles of other major roadways, for a combined 15.92 miles of major local streets. Intersections and traf�ic control are critical elements within this system; the inventory includes 5 fully actuated traf�ic signals, 224 simple two-way signals, 2 intersection signal improvements, and 16 arterial/collector intersections. Street operations and safety features— including signing/striping, communications/ITS, and corridor lighting—support safe operation and visibility throughout the network and are coordinated with corridor and intersection improvements to maintain functionality.

This section is limited to assets and infrastructure only; monetary values and replacement costs for the inventoried facilities are presented in the Existing Financial Commitment section that follows.

Existing Financial Commitment: Grand Terrace’s street system represents a substantial public investment made over many years by existing residents and businesses. At 2025 replacement costs, the inventoried Street Improvements assets total $325,666,387 and include arterials ($57,945,440), collectors ($133,866,240), other major roadways ($19,901,846), right-of-way ($20,520,061), intersection signal improvements ($800,000), fully actuated traf�ic signals ($5,000,000), simple twoway signals ($67,200,000), arterial/collector intersections ($16,000,000), street signs ($2,087,800), and safety light poles/lighting ($2,345,000).
35