GRASS VALLEY
City Council Regular Meeting, Capital Improvements Authority and Redevelopment "Successor Agency"
Tuesday, April 28, 2026 at 6:00 PM
Council Chambers, Grass Valley City Hall | 125 East Main Street, Grass Valley, California Telephone: (530) 274-4310 – Fax: (530) 274-4399
E-Mail: [email protected] Web Site: www.cityofgrassvalley.com AGENDA
Any person with a disability who requires accommodations to participate in this meeting should telephone the City Clerk’s office at (530)274-4390, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to make a request for a disability related modification or accommodation.
Mayor Hilary Hodge, Vice Mayor Haven Caravelli, Councilmember Jan Arbuckle, Councilmember Joe Bonomolo, Councilmember Tom Ivy
MEETING NOTICE
City Council welcomes you to attend the meetings electronically or in person at the City Hall Council Chambers, located at 125 E. Main St., Grass Valley, CA 95945. Regular Meetings are scheduled at 6:00 p.m. on the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of each month. Your interest is encouraged and appreciated.
This meeting is being broadcast “live” on Comcast Channel 17 & 18 by Nevada County Media, on the internet at www.cityofgrassvalley.com, or on the City of Grass Valley YouTube channel at https://www.youtube.com/@cityofgrassvalley.com Members of the public are encouraged to submit public comments via voicemail at (530) 274-4390 and email to [email protected]. Comments will be reviewed and distributed before the meeting if received by 5pm. Comments received after that will be addressed during the item and/or at the end of the meeting. Council will have the option to modify their action on items based on comments received. Action may be taken on any agenda item.
Agenda materials, staff reports, and background information related to regular agenda items are available on the City’s website: www.cityofgrassvalley.com. Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet will be made available on the City of Grass Valley website at www.cityofgrassvalley.com, subject to City staff’s ability to post the documents before the meeting.
Please note, individuals who disrupt, disturb, impede, or render infeasible the orderly conduct of a meeting will receive one warning that, if they do not cease such behavior, they may be removed from the meeting. The chair has authority to order individuals removed if they do not cease their disruptive behavior following this warning. No warning is required before an individual is removed if that individual engages in a use of force or makes a true threat of force. (Gov. Code, § 54957.95.)
City of Grass Valley, CA AGENDA April 28, 2026
Council Chambers are wheelchair accessible and listening devices are available. Other special accommodations may be requested to the City Clerk 72 hours in advance of the meeting by calling (530) 274-4390, we are happy to accommodate.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
AGENDA APPROVAL - The City Council reserves the right to hear items in a different order to accomplish business in the most efficient manner.
REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION
INTRODUCTIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
CITY UPDATE
1. Downtown Construction Update
PUBLIC COMMENT - Members of the public are encouraged to submit public comments via voicemail at (530) 274-4390 and email to [email protected]. Comments will be reviewed and distributed before the meeting if received by 5pm. Comments received after 5pm will be addressed during the item and/or at the end of the meeting. Council will have the option to modify their action on items based on comments received. Action may be taken on any agenda item. There is a time limitation of three minutes per person for all emailed, voicemail, or in person comments, and only one type of public comment per person. Speaker cards are assigned for public comments that are on any items not on the agenda, and within the jurisdiction or interest of the City. Speaker Cards can be pulled until the opening of public comment at which time sign ups will no longer be allowed.
These cards can be found at the City Clerks desk. If you wish to speak regarding a scheduled agenda item, please come to the podium when the item is announced. When recognized, please begin by providing your name and address for the record (optional). Thirty minutes of public comment will be heard under this item in order of the speaker card assigned and the remaining general public comments will be heard at the end of the meeting. We will begin with number one.
CONSENT ITEMS -All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are to be considered routine by the City Council and/or Grass Valley Redevelopment Agency and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless, before the City Council and/or Grass Valley Redevelopment Agency votes on the motion to adopt, members of the Council and/or Agency, staff or the public request specific items to be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion and action but Council action is required to do so (roll call vote).Unless the Council removes an item from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion, public comments are invited as to the consent calendar as a whole and limited to three minutes per person.
2. Approval of the Regular Meeting Minutes of April 14th, 2026 Recommendation: Council approve minutes as submitted.
3. Second reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grass Valley adding section 17.74.060(A.5.) Of chapter 17.74 and section 17.81.130 (C.) of Chapter 17.81,
City of Grass Valley, CA AGENDA April 28, 2026
Title 17 of the Grass Valley Municipal Code regarding tolling provisions and expiration terms for development entitlements and tentative maps
CEQA: Not a Project under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15378 Recommendation: Hold a second reading, waive full reading, to adopt Ordinance No. 841 adding section 17.74.060(A.5.) of chapter 17.74 and section 17.81.130 (C.) of Chapter 17.81, Title 17 of the Grass Valley Municipal Code regarding tolling provisions and expiration terms for development entitlements and tentative maps (Attachment 1)
4. Nevada County Transportation Commission FY 2026/27 Overall Work Program Approval CEQA: N/A – Not a Project
Recommendation: That Council: 1) review the projects proposed for inclusion in the Nevada County Transportation Commission FY 2026/27 Overall Work Program, 2) adopt a Resolution approving the projects for inclusion in the Nevada County Transportation Commission Overall Work Program
5. AB 481 – Military Equipment Annual Inventory and Report; renewal of ordinance #815 CEQA: Not a Project
Recommendation: (1) Renew previously adopted ordinance #815 pursuant to requirements of AB-481; (2) Approve the attached Annual Military Equipment Report and Annual Inventory Report- “Addendum A” and “Addendum B” respectively; (3) Approve the expenditure of $1824.32 to replenish equipment stock; (4) deem three UAV devices as “surplus personal property”; (5) direct the department head, with approval of the City Manager, to dispose of surplus personal property in accordance with 3.08.220 B,3,c of the municipal code.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION OR SEPARATE ACTION AND /
OR ANY ADDED AGENDA ITEMS
REORGANIZATION RELATED ITEMS
PUBLIC HEARING
ADMINISTRATIVE
6. Resolution Recognizing and Adopting Culture Forward 2026-2032: Nevada County’s Arts & Culture Action Plan
CEQA: Not a project
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution 2026-09 recognizing and adopting Culture Forward 2026-2032 as a guiding framework supporting the continued vitality of arts, culture, and the creative economy in Nevada County.
BRIEF REPORTS BY COUNCIL MEMBERS
CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC COMMENT
ADJOURN
POSTING NOTICE
City of Grass Valley, CA AGENDA April 28, 2026
This is to certify that the above notice of a meeting of The City Council, scheduled for Tuesday, April 28, 2026, at 6:00 p.m., was posted at city hall, easily accessible to the public, as of 5:00 p.m. Friday, April 24, 2026.
________________________
Taylor Whittingslow, City Clerk
GRASS VALLEY
City Council Regular Meeting, Capital Improvements Authority and Redevelopment "Successor Agency"
Tuesday, April 14, 2026 at 6:00 PM
Council Chambers, Grass Valley City Hall | 125 East Main Street, Grass Valley, California Telephone: (530) 274-4310 – Fax: (530) 274-4399
E-Mail: [email protected] Web Site: www.cityofgrassvalley.com
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER
Meeting called to order at 6:02 pm.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Hodge led the pledge of allegiance.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT
Councilmember Jan Arbuckle
Councilmember Joe Bonomolo
Councilmember Tom Ivy
Vice Mayor Haven Caravelli
Mayor Hilary Hodge
AGENDA APPROVAL -
Motion made by Councilmember Arbuckle, Seconded by Vice Mayor Caravelli.
Voting Yea: Councilmember Arbuckle, Councilmember Bonomolo, Councilmember Ivy, Vice Mayor Caravelli, Mayor Hodge
REPORT OUT OF CLOSED SESSION
No closed session.
INTRODUCTIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
1. Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention Month Proclamation
2. Nevada County presentation of Animal Shelter progress
3. Wayward Journey 1-Year Partnership Presentation
4. Community Roots Presentation
5. Arts, Culture, & Creativity Month Proclamation
CITY UPDATE
Item # 2.
City of Grass Valley, CA MINUTES April 14, 2026
PUBLIC COMMENT -
Public comments: speakers 1 thru 4 (noted changes no speaker #2) & unnamed.
Virtual comments attached.
CONSENT ITEMS -
Public comment: Matthew Coulter
Motion to approve consent as submitted by Councilmember Arbuckle, Seconded by Councilmember Bonomolo.
Voting Yea: Councilmember Arbuckle, Councilmember Bonomolo, Councilmember Ivy, Vice Mayor Caravelli, Mayor Hodge
6. Approval of the Regular Meeting Minutes of March 24th, 2026 Recommendation: Council approve minutes as submitted.
7. Memorandum of Understanding with the Sierra Nevada Firefighters, IAFF Local 3800 (Unit 8) for the Period January 1, 2026 – December 31, 2026 CEQA: Not a Project
Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2026-08 approving a twelve (12) month Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Grass Valley and the Sierra Nevada Firefighters, IAFF Local 3800 (Unit 8), effective January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2026.
8. Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Grass Valley and Nevada County Resource Conservation District (NCRCD) (via direct funding allocation award; PG&E)
CEQA: Multiple Proposed Projects. Either CEQA exempt and/or NCRCD/Contractor provides CEQA + any/all required permitting services.
Recommendation: Authorize City Manager or City Representative to sign/execute the MOU with Nevada County Resource Conservation District (NCRCD), subject to legal review.
9. Condon Park Skatepark Project – Final Acceptance
CEQA: N/A – Project is Complete
Recommendation: That Council: 1) accept the Condon Park Skatepark Project as complete, and 2) authorize the Deputy Public Works Director to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder.
10. Prefabricated Restroom Site Improvements Project – Contract Change Order CEQA: Existing facility
Recommendation: That Council authorize the City Engineer to execute a contract change order of up to $200,000.00 for added work on the Prefabricated Restroom Site Improvements Project.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION OR SEPARATE ACTION AND /
OR ANY ADDED AGENDA ITEMS
REORGANIZATION RELATED ITEMS
Item # 2.
City of Grass Valley, CA MINUTES April 14, 2026
PUBLIC HEARING
11. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grass Valley adding section
17.74.060(A.5.) Of chapter 17.74 and section 17.81.130 (C.) of Chapter 17.81, Title 17 of the Grass Valley Municipal Code regarding tolling provisions and expiration terms for development entitlements and tentative maps
CEQA: Not a Project under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15378 Recommendation:Introduce Ordinance No. 841 adding section 17.74.060(A.5.) of chapter 17.74 and section 17.81.130 (C.) of Chapter 17.81, Title 17 of the Grass Valley Municipal Code regarding tolling provisions and expiration terms for development entitlements and tentative maps, waive full reading, and read by Title Only (Attachment 2)
Amy Wolfson, City Planning, gave overview of the Ordinance to the council.
Public comment: Unnamed
Motion to Introduce Ordinance No. 841 adding section 17.74.060(A.5.) of chapter
17.74 and section 17.81.130 (C.) of Chapter 17.81, Title 17 of the Grass Valley Municipal Code regarding tolling provisions and expiration terms for development entitlements and tentative maps, waive full reading, and read by Title Only (Attachment 2) by Councilmember Arbuckle, Seconded by Vice Mayor Caravelli.
Voting Yea: Councilmember Arbuckle, Councilmember Bonomolo, Councilmember Ivy, Vice Mayor Caravelli, Mayor Hodge
ADMINISTRATIVE
12. Resolution Recognizing and Adopting Culture Forward 2026-2032: Nevada County’s Arts & Culture Action Plan
CEQA: Not a project
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution 2026-09 recognizing and adopting Culture Forward 2026-2032 as a guiding framework supporting the continued vitality of arts, culture, and the creative economy in Nevada County.
Item was requested to be post-pone until April 28th, 2026.
Motion made to post-pone meeting until the 28th of April by Councilmember Arbuckle, Seconded by Councilmember Bonomolo.
Voting Yea: Councilmember Arbuckle, Councilmember Bonomolo, Councilmember Ivy, Vice Mayor Caravelli, Mayor Hodge
BRIEF REPORTS BY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Councilmember Bonomolo attended a Solid Hazard Waste commission meeting.
Councilmember Ivy attended the Skate Park Grand opening and is looking for the councils support in signing a letter of support for a Placer County Biomass Grant.
Councilmember Arbuckle attended a League of California Cities Meeting, the ribbon cutting of the Skatepark, GVDA Merchant Meeting, Nevada County Law Enforcement Meeting, and the Sacramento Sheriffs Department First annual reunion. Vice Mayor Caravelli attended a Mural tour for the Arts Council, a meeting for the Art project on the CalTrans Pillars, ERC meeting, Child Abuse Prevention, and county dispatch meeting. Mayor Hodge attended the Working lands meeting at Northstar house, a Sierra harvest Soup event, a class on AI, and wanted to say thank you to all of the Doctors in our community.
Item # 2.
City of Grass Valley, CA MINUTES April 14, 2026
CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC COMMENT
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 7:49 pm.
Adopted on:___________
______________________________ ____________________________ Hilary Hodge, Mayor Taylor Whittingslow, City Clerk
Item # 2.
CITY OF GRASS VALLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING
GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT SIGN IN SHEET
WELCOME to the City of Grass Vattey City Council meeting! Public Comments provide an opportunity for the pubtic to address the City CounciI on any subject which is not on the agenda but in the jurisdiction of the councit. lf you wish to speak, please indicate in the appropriate box when you sign in and take the number corresponding to your name. Each individual can have up to 3 minutes of pubtic comment. At the beginning of the meeting, there witl be an atlotted 30 minutes of generat pubtic comments and the remainder of comments wil[ be heard at the end of the agenda.
Speakers witt be calted in order of the numbers given.
When you are recognized by the mayor:
1. Please stand before the podium and give your name and address. (optionat)
2. Ptease limit your comments to three minutes per speaker.
3. lf previous speakers have made the same point, you may simply indicate your support or disagreement, untess you have new information.
Thank you for your participation. q \r{ LL
a
a
0 #'s Print Name
Or N/A
Address
(optional)
Self/Business
(optional)
1 rf)nnLl,,- lhanrnn h il r ffs /t,i, kt)nt ,eI e ^/2 tt^\ '| ,' ..Arn\ /\,
3 Kttlhaior,r
4 Q.p,l-J)P--r,=\ et l:>r^-y'x^rtB€ \,-
5 6
7 I
10 11
12 13
W
9 14 Page 9
Item # 2.
March 106, 2020
The Honorable Governor Gavin Newsom
State of California
1303 1fth Street, Suite 1173
sacramento, cA 95814
Dear Governor Gavin Newsom,
We would like your help to implement this program statewide. The Soals of the program are:
1. No abandoning pets and animals in city or county properties.
2. Patrols will watch and report any human or animal safety issues.
3. Highly visible slgns will warn anyone that the neighbors are actively watching for safety issues,
4. These programs seek to stop cruelty to all animals: cats, dogs, birds, horses, snakes, deer, bear, livestock and wildlife.
5. These Neighborhood Animal Watch programs will be partnerships between local Sheriff departments and communities.
6. We intend to take control of unsafe issues, so injuries and losses are minimized.
Also, it is very important that we address the issues regarding animal abuse associated with the homeless.
Please see the attached petition.
I appreciate all that you do for our state, and I look forward to seeing the positive changes that you are making. Thank you for listening.
Respectfully,
Marilyn Chapman
11185 Lime Kiln Rd
Grass Valley, CA 95949
530-798-8380
We are writing this letter because you are dedicated to no-kill shelters throughout the State of California. We have a signed petition for Nevada county to develop a program called Neighborhood Animal Watch which could help reduce the number of animals placed in shelters.
Item # 2.
l
a I
t &'
t
et or 00
a
I
I'l11 W,P ,
N,rlil?l;if,fl
p,"c/e-n 1, er'., Pibqran"r
\Jc iL''r'i -llo
Cie aos'/3qo
B fr,a Cttil'1 * sdo
tct-l " }-O"t5
Item # 2.
Nciglrt;ttrl tootl
fi 1'
-) V i) {:
r\niutal
Watch
To All Nevada CountY Residents
This is a pctition to tbrrl a ncw' colnlllunity gror'tp klrown as Ncighborhood Animal Watch
Our statcd goals arc as tbllows:
l. No abanclonirrg pets and anilnals in city or c()unty propertics'
2. Patrols will u,atch and report any lrtlman or anilnal saf'ety issues'
3. Highly visible sigrrs will warn anyone th.rt the neighbors are actively lvatchiug ltrr sal'cty issues.
4. Tlrese programs seek to stop cruelty to all animals: cats, dogs, birds, lrorses, strakes' deer, bear, livestock ar,d w'ildlit'e'
5. These NeigSborhood Anirnal Watcl"r progranls are partnsrships local SherifT and our commurr ities,
6. We irrterr4 to take control of unsalte issues so injuries and losses trre minir]'rizecl. please understand that these signs and tlre prograllrs they rcpl'esellt etre itrtended as warnings that the neighborhood is wt>rking t()gethcr to prevent any httrnr fronl cotning to our belovecl pets and wilcllife. Plcasc sign this petition fbr a saf'er conrmttuity fbr us arrd otrr pcts.
SICNAT AI)DRt:SS
1L511 y'r'ane r3 z^. (p(C,ttY \"21 rPt
6V,qtqqct
t,ltrL2 ? u,l,l
Lll- GQ q?
.r..
q
8zo GaAqe( lp,n e- & v q5i'14
Item # 2.
To All Nevada County Residents
This is a petition to post a sign for Neighborhood Animal Watch Program
1. No more abandoning animals in the City or County properties
2. We watch for humans and animals safety
3. We want a sign that warns society that we are WATCHING out for our animals and our community's safety
4. We want to stop cruelty to animals; cats, dogs, birds, wildlife, horses, snakes, deer, bear and livestock
5. The Neighborhood Animal Watch is a partnership within our communities that encourages a safer and more aware of watching out what is in our surroundings
6. Take control of matters that occur in unsafe conditions
7. To have information at the start of the problem-before losses develop.
Please understand the sign is a warning that the neighborhood is working together for all of our beloved pets and wildlifel
Please sign for a smarter environment for all of us. Neighborhood animals need protection.
Print Name Address a
rzlc<
u. (a lJrJ<P- d_ Z
(
\t
o
L a
'1,47 L>
(
5rt q
Ls Ln. t\) k 5orr 6V c^ry4v4
3- re
I
M/'/ !;tL t /1Al ,l lL4
,-)
lqr^
Item # 2.
Printed Name
mdtst<
Address Signature
s
6S7tt
t) 1
n a
tz=
A 5'19
3 E A'f,ot\
S zsoz
so€ & B f/-1
o
L-\3
1 t
a rtw
L*"-L
0". 57.
d
\) u)nDtLd4)
6 Jt-e! E t1 G
r^ 15053 A.{nb.v YL n /i:
\
IA lt
ZI D VT'C
0 5y'* 4
Item # 2.
Printed Name Address Signature
o
2i6h a
(ol
we
"\
tt t+..1 ,fl t
82\ {r, LD
n O15)
()
r^l n
[t--*
l-a" 5h,,.,{f te/c/ / a.t t ; 9<J U
&f\ 1
n-a^, ( 7li a (,
4 {c4 qq
n,\(nul
Leo\ l2o2l Ro" ot ot H 259,1
A I
Item # 2.
To All Nevada County Residents
This is a petition to post a sign for Neighborhood Animal Watch Program
1. No more abandoning animals in the City or County properties
2. We watch for humans and animals safety
3. We want a sign that warns society that we are WATCHING out for our animals and our community's safety
4. We want to stop cruelty to animals; cats, dogs, birds, wildlife, horses, snakes, deer, bear and livestock
5. The Neighborhood Animal Watch is a partnership within our communities that encourages a safer and more aware of watching out what is in our surroundings
6. Take control of matters that occur in unsafe conditions
7. To have information at the start of the problem-before losses develop.
Please understand the sign is a warning that the neighborhood is working together for all of our beloved pets and wildlife!
Please sign for a smarter environment for all of us. Neighborhood animals need protection.
Printed Name Address si n atu re
P ??<rysa3 4{L A, L+ qsq
ef\l ?
tt+
q5qfi
1 o-
€
ctl'l rct* t) / 1o c-t c
u)
,^)
L.r
'/
l. (2
I
'nriu
lL)\%
L-tVYO
loa,€ Ne,n L.
x
:92 f
L
Item # 2.
To AII Nevada County Resadents
This is a petition to form a new community group known as
1. No abandoning pets and animals in city or county properties'
2. We watch and report any human or animal safety issues.
3. We want siens that say our neighbors are actively watching out for our animals and any safety issues.
4. We want to stop cruelty to all animals: cats, dogs, birds, horses, snakes, deer, bear, livestock and wildlife.
5. These Neighborhood Animal Watch programs are partnerships within our community that encourages a safer and more secure environment for people and animals'
6. We will take control of unsafe situations before losses increase.
Please understand that these sips and the programs they represent are intended as wamings that the neighborhood is working together to prevent any harm from coming to our beloved pets and wildlife. Please sign this petition for a safer community for us and oul pets.
PRINTEDNAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE
ur Lu
P.AIE
w
^L?- {LA/ lt?
r^l
cL/ b wooL 6V 1.,\
Neighborhood Animal Watch
Our stated goals are as follows:
.,no< 7A ("t \'
Item # 2.
Printed Name Address
'ZV
Signat e
t-. \ v,, qr
C
t+6
il5 Au G
irvAet LA
a
tNU
3Ef)aw. ,Na-5 Lt
L-'/-
c,h
uefo
0 or |f C, IL
!: ( a_n L,
385 (l
/?,t
Item # 2.
t?l=lfl\ll? c/\l=l= NEVADA
COUNTY
Got something broken?
Throw it away? No way!
Repair Cafe t{evada County is a volunteer-run community event dedicated to encouraging the repair and reuse oI goods, creating a waste-free culture of caring.
Free Community Event!
Reduce Waste.
Share Skills.
Build Community.
SUNDAY MAY 17
2-5PM
Madellyn Helling Library
Repair Cal6 is all about repairing
things together.
Volunteer with us!
Want lo help your neighborc by oliering your
skill and love ol fixing things? Become a
Sometimes we can fax it, sometimes we can
identify the problem and send you home with a
plan, and sometimes it may be time to recycle an
item. Eitherway, we're helping extend the life of
the things we love.
volunteer and have a great time!
Small Appliances . Electronics.
Bikes. Sewing/Textiles . Jewelry .
Mechanical ltems . Furniture
AII creative problem-solvers
I I GEXEBAL I}IIERESI
SIGN UP FONM
Scan the OR code to stay informed
about luture Repair Caf6s
itp-!4!!ysL99EI9p3ssc!9!9r89
E VOLUXTEER / FIXER
SIGN UP FORI'
Scan the OR code to help repair items at
tEp-!l!!!vulggdrep3[earelEvl.Ela].u!&el
t
I I
I
.?
Questions? Contact Shirley at [email protected]
I
7-
I
lI
a I
I
I
a
t'l I
!
I I
u.
{
)
t
-.l \
Item # 2.
City of Grass Valley
City Council
Agenda Action Sheet
Title: Second reading of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Grass Valley adding section 17.74.060(A.5.) Of chapter 17.74 and section
17.81.130 (C.) of Chapter 17.81, Title 17 of the Grass Valley Municipal Code regarding tolling provisions and expiration terms for development entitlements and tentative maps
CEQA: Not a Project under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15378 Recommendation:
Hold a second reading, waive full reading, to adopt Ordinance No. 841 adding section
17.74.060(A.5.) of chapter 17.74 and section 17.81.130 (C.) of Chapter 17.81, Title 17 of the Grass Valley Municipal Code regarding tolling provisions and expiration terms for development entitlements and tentative maps (Attachment 1)
Prepared by: Amy Wolfson, City Planner
Council Meeting Date: April 28, 2026 Date Prepared: April 22, 2026 Agenda: Consent
Background Information: In September 2024, staff brought the Dorsey Marketplace Supplemental Final Environmental Impact Report (SFEIR) to Council to take action on the entirety of the EIR prepared for the project. The SFEIR was required after a legal challenge was filed and the appeals court determined that the City failed to analyze the impact of traffic generated by the Project and its potential to exacerbate health risks for future Project residents and occupants. The Project and the initial EIR were approved by City Council at their regular meeting held on April 28, 2020. The aforementioned legal challenge of that approval was filed shortly thereafter, and the judge required the additional analysis mentioned above. The time between the initial entitlement approval and the dismissal of the legal challenge was almost three and a half years. Development entitlements have a standard one-year expiration unless conditioned otherwise and tentative maps have a standard three-year expiration timeframe. While the applicant could technically have pulled permits, it is generally ill-advised during instances of pending litigation given the uncertainty of the outcome and the financial burdens that come with exercising an entitlement. Once legal staff determined that the litigation did not automatically toll the entitlements, Planning staff were asked to prepare an ordinance that would toll such entitlement approvals only during instances of legal challenge, for the rare occasions that legal challenges occur on approved projects in the future. The proposed ordinance language does not have any effect on the previously approved Dorsey Marketplace proposal from 2020, which is currently being re-processed. If adopted, the ordinance will only impact future projects.
Item # 3.
PROPOSED ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT
The proposed Ordinance language seeks to increase the initial time period within which a permit must be exercised, going from twelve months to twenty-four months. It also aims to add tolling language to development entitlements, such as Development Review Permits, Use Permits, and Variances, as well as to Tentative Map entitlements, in Section 17.74.060 and
17.81.130, respectively. Entitlement tolling would automatically occur for the duration of time a project is under legal challenge. Both sections would be revised to include tolling language to an approved entitlement project or tentative subdivision map that “is the subject of a lawsuit pending in a court of competent jurisdiction, during which time [the project] shall be tolled, and not expire.” Staff is also taking the opportunity to fix a couple typos in these code sections, one of which is an inconsistent section sequencing typo, and one is a misspelled “siz” instead of “six.”
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed zoning ordinance text amendment at their regular meeting held on March 17, 2026 and recommended 3 to 0 (two absent), that the City Council approve the text amendment as presented.
INTRODUCTION AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING:
The Ordinance was introduced at the public hearing before the City Council of Grass Valley at their regular meeting on April 14, 2026. City Council voted 5-0 to approve the Ordinance language as written, and as modified by staff to correct the missing strikeout information in reference to the removal of a twelve-month time limit, in favor of the proposed twenty-four month time period appliable to entitlement projects.
Council Goals/Objectives: This ordinance supports the 2022 Strategic Plan Update, Goal #5:
the City of Grass Valley strives to exemplify an innovative, efficient, effective, open and collaborative city government.
Fiscal Impact: Drafting of the ordinance required staff time.
Funds Available: None Account #: TBD Reviewed by: City Manager Attachments:
1. Ordinance 841, adopt the Zoning Text Amendment
Item # 3.
430778.4 1
ORDINANCE NO. 841
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRASS
VALLEY AMENDING SECTION 17.74.060 OF CHAPTER 17.74 AND
SECTION 17.81.130 OF CHAPTER 17.81, TITLE 17 OF THE GRASS VALLEY
MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING TOLLING PROVISIONS FOR
DEVELOPMENT ENTITLEMENTS AND TENTATIVE MAPS
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment to allow tolling of development permits and tentative maps is consistent with the General Plan because is supports orderly development, ensures full compliance with environmental review requirements, protects previously approved projects found to be consistent with the General Plan, and promotes fair and transparent governance without increasing development intensity or undermining adopted land use policies; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan by preserving approvals already determined to be consistent with its goals and policies; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is not detrimental to the public interest of the City because the amendment promotes fairness and predictability in the City’s land use entitlement process by ensuring that entitlements do not expire due to delays caused by judicial review, which is an essential component of public participation and due process; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the health of the City because tolling avoids pressure to commence construction before health-related issues raised in litigation are fully resolved and because tolling will prevent construction, occupancy or operation of any project during the tolling period; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment would not be detrimental to safety of the City because all future development will still be required to comply with applicable fire, building, seismic, and emergency access requirements in effect at the time permits are issued and prevents development from occurring during unresolved legal challenges that may be safety-related in nature; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the convenience of the City because it promotes efficient use of City resources and reduces administrative burdens on staff, applicants, and the public; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the welfare of the City because tolling balances the public’s right to seek judicial review with the City’s interest in implementing adopted land use decisions; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is internally consistent with other applicable provisions of the development code, none of which prohibit tolling, and which otherwise acknowledge that certain delays not in the applicant’s control may be grounds for the extension of approvals under the Development Code; and
Item # 3.
430778.4 2
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after considering public comment, held a duly noticed public hearing and reviewed the draft zoning text amendment at its regular meeting held on March 17, 2026 and voted 3-0 (2 absent) to recommend adoption by the City Council.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRASS VALLEY:
SECTION 1. RECITALS. The City Council adopts the recitals above as true and correct findings under Section 17.94.060 of the Grass Valley Municipal Code for Development Code amendments, and incorporates these recitals into this Ordinance.
SECTION 2. CODE AMENDMENT. Section 17.74.060 of Chapter 17.74 of Title 17 of the Grass Valley Municipal Code as follows is hereby amended to read as follows (strikeout is used to denote existing text being deleted; underline is used to denote new text being added):
17.74.060 – Time limits and extensions
A. Time Limits.
1. Unless a condition of approval or other provision of this development code establishes a different time limit, any permit or approval not exercised within twelve twenty-four months of approval shall expire and become void, except where an extension of time is approved in compliance with Subsection B., below.
2. The permit shall not be deemed "exercised" until the permittee has received a building permit or has actually commenced the allowed use on the site in compliance with the conditions of approval.
3. After it has been exercised, a planning permit shall remain valid and run with the land in compliance with Section 17.74.040, as long as a building permit is active for the project, and after a final building inspection or certificate of occupancy has been granted.
4. If a project is to be developed in approved phases, each subsequent phase shall be exercised within twelve months from the date that the previous phase was exercised, unless otherwise specified in the permit, or the permit shall expire and become void, except where an extension of time is approved in compliance with Subsection B., below. If the project also involves the approval of a tentative map, the phasing shall be consistent with the tentative map and the permit shall be exercised before the expiration of the tentative map, or the permit shall expire and become void.
5. The period to exercise any permit or approval granted pursuant to this Chapter shall be tolled, and shall not expire, during the time that any or all such approvals are, or were, the subject of a lawsuit pending in a court of competent jurisdiction.
Item # 3.
430778.4 3
T B. Extensions of Time. Upon written request by the applicant, the applicable review authority may extend the time for an approved planning permit to be exercised. …
SECTION 3. CODE AMENDMENT. Section 17.81.130 of Chapter 17.81 of Title 17 of the Grass Valley Municipal Code as follows is hereby added to read as follows:
17.81.130 - Tentative map time limits and expiration.
An approved tentative map is valid for thirty-six months after its effective date (Section
17.81.080), except as otherwise provided by Map Act Sections 66452.6, 66452.11, 66452.13, or 66463.5. At the end of thirty-sizx months, the approval shall expire and become void unless:
A. A parcel or final map, and related security and improvement agreements, have been filed with the city engineer in compliance with Chapter 17.82 (parcel maps and final maps); or
B. An extension of time has been granted in compliance with Section 17.81.140.
C. The approval is the subject of a lawsuit pending in a court of competent jurisdiction, during which time the thirty-six month period shall be tolled, and shall not expire.
Expiration of an approved tentative map or vesting tentative map shall terminate all proceedings. The application shall not be reactivated unless a new tentative map application is filed.
SECTION 4. CEQA. This Ordinance has been assessed in accordance with the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the environmental regulations of the city. City Planning Staff has determined that the adoption and implementation of the Ordinance is exempt from further environmental review under the general rule in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) that CEQA only applies to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. As a series of text amendments and additions without any physical project being approved, and not involving a commitment to any specific project that may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment. Further, adoption of an ordinance to toll approvals during instances of legal challenge is a policy-level administrative action that does not authorize or approve any specific physical development and therefore does not constitute a “project” under CEQA Guidelines §15378. The City Council concurs in these findings and adopts them as its own. The City Council, therefore, directs that a Notice of Exemption be filed with the County Clerk of the County of Nevada in accordance with CEQA Guidelines.
Item # 3.
430778.4 4
SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or its application to other persons and circumstances. The City Council of the City of Grass Valley declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof despite the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional and, to that end, the provisions hereof are hereby declared to be severable.
SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect 30 days after its adoption under Article VII, § 2 of the Grass Valley City Charter.
SECTION 7. PUBLICATION. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published once in The Union, a newspaper of general circulation printed, published, and circulated within the City.
INTRODUCED and first read at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 14th day of April 2026.
FINAL PASSAGE AND ADOPTION by the City Council was at a meeting held on the twenty-eighth day of April 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINING:
________________________________
Hilary Hodge, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
________________________________ ________________________________ David Ruderman, City Attorney Taylor Whittingslow, City Clerk
Item # 3.
City of Grass Valley
City Council
Agenda Action Sheet
Title: Nevada County Transportation Commission FY 2026/27 Overall Work Program Approval
CEQA: N/A – Not a Project
Recommendation: That Council: 1) review the projects proposed for inclusion in the Nevada County Transportation Commission FY 2026/27 Overall Work Program, 2) adopt a Resolution approving the projects for inclusion in the Nevada County Transportation Commission Overall Work Program
Prepared by: Bjorn P. Jones, PE, City Engineer
Council Meeting Date: 04/28/2026 Date Prepared: 04/22/2026 Agenda: Consent
Background Information: Staff for Nevada County Transportation Commission (NCTC) have prepared an Overall Work Program (OWP) for FY 2026/27. The OWP is prepared on an annual basis as a scope of work and budget for transportation planning activities for the fiscal year. The OWP is a requirement of NCTC’s Master Fund Transfer Agreement with the State of California and includes the following three components:
Introduction, Work Elements, and Budget.
The purpose of the proposed OWP for FY 2026/27 is to: 1) show how the Federal Planning Factors will be integrated into the OWP work elements; 2) outline continuing and new major activities; and 3) present a summary of the expected revenues and expenditures for the fiscal year. A final OWP will be presented at the May 20, 2026 NCTC meeting.
Adoption of the attached Resolution is recommended, approving the proposed projects for inclusion in the Nevada County Transportation Commission Overall Work Program.
Council Goals/Objectives: The NCTC Overall Work Program executes portions of work tasks towards achieving/maintaining Strategic Goal - City Infrastructure Investment.
Fiscal Impact: N/A
Funds Available: N/A Account #: N/A
Reviewed by: Interim City Manager Attachments: Draft Overall Work Program
Item # 4.
Nevada County
Transportation Commission
DRAFT
2026/27 Overall Work Program
March 18, 2026
Item # 4.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
NCTC MISSION STATEMENT............................................................................................I-1 NCTC ORGANIZATION FLOW CHART .........................................................................I-2 OVERALL WORK PROGRAM INTRODUCTION .........................................................I-3 WORK ELEMENT 1 – COMMUNICATION AND COORDINATION...............................1 Project 1.1 General Services and Communication..............................................................2 Project 1.2 Fiscal Administration........................................................................................3 WORK ELEMENT 2 - REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ............................5 Project 2.1 Transportation Planning...................................................................................7 Project 2.1.3 Active Transportation Plan Update…………………………………………10 Project 2.2 Transportation Improvement Programs .........................................................12 Project 2.3 Transit and Paratransit Programs...................................................................14 Project 2.3.4 Reenvisioning Transit in Western Nevada County ..............................................16 Project 2.3.5 SB 125 Transit Planning and Administration.......................................................18 Project 2.4 Coordination of Regional Planning ...............................................................19 Project 2.4.2 Airport Land Use Commission Planning and Reviews .................................22 WORK ELEMENT 3 - CALTRANS ACTIVITIES WITH NCTC......................................23 Glossary of Terms and Acronyms ...........................................................................................24 BUDGET TABLES:
TABLE 1 Budget Summary............................................................................................B-1 TABLE 2 Direct Costs....................................................................................................B-2 TABLE 3 Indirect Costs.................................................................................................B-3 TABLE 4 Revenues…........................................................................................................B-4 TABLE 5 Expenditures.......................................................................................................B-5 TABLE 6 Budget Detail .................................................................................................B-6
Item # 4.
I-1
NEVADA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
CREATING A BETTER FUTURE BY BUILDING UPON SUCCESSES OF THE PAST
MISSION STATEMENT
The mission of the Nevada County Transportation Commission is to plan, communicate, and coordinate with the citizens and decision makers of Grass Valley, Nevada City, Nevada County, Town of Truckee, and with Caltrans to identify transportation needs, propose solutions, and assist in implementing projects to create a balanced regional transportation system, while protecting the rural qualities and historic character of Nevada County.
Activities to Achieve the Mission Include, But are not Limited to, the Following:
NCTC develops a Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) which includes the actions, funding recommendations, and policy direction necessary to meet the needs of each transportation system component in the region.
NCTC interacts with the community through workshops, news media outlets, the NCTC website, and through social media platforms.
NCTC develops and adopts a Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) that is consistent with the RTP.
NCTC conducts a comprehensive planning process in the development of its annual Overall Work Program so that funds expended on planning projects will implement the goals of the RTP. NCTC reviews transportation plans and programs of member agencies and endorses them based on consistency with the RTP and RTIP. In keeping with this responsibility, NCTC strives to be creative in assisting the region in developing the revenues to construct improvement projects. NCTC communicates and participates in workshops with Caltrans on proposed projects to be developed in the County of Nevada to ensure that the policies and goals of the RTP are implemented. NCTC coordinates with regional transportation planning agencies on legislation and statewide policy issues to ensure the region receives appropriate attention and funding from the State of California and the Federal government.
NCTC participates in interregional planning projects to ensure Nevada County projects support both regional and statewide transportation goals.
NCTC administers Transportation Development Act funds to ensure all statutory requirements are met, including the identification of the region’s transit needs. NCTC manages Regional Surface Transportation Program funds, Regional Transportation Mitigation Fee funds, Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program funds, Carbon Reduction Program, and Regional Improvement Program funds in accordance with Federal acts and statutes promulgated by the State of California, selecting and funding eligible transportation improvement projects based upon those that are most effective and beneficial to the region.
Item # 4.
I-2
Nevada County Transportation Commission
Organization Flow Chart
Nevada County Transportation Commission (NCTC)
NCTC is a Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) created pursuant to Title 7.88 of the State of California Government Code, Section 67920. As the RTPA for Nevada County, NCTC coordinates transportation planning for Grass Valley, Nevada City, Nevada County, and the Town of Truckee. The NCTC board has seven members. Four members are appointed by the Board of Supervisors and three are appointed by the incorporated municipalities in the County. The Board of Supervisors appoints two of its members and two County at-large representatives. The municipalities appoint three city/town council members; one each from Nevada City, Grass Valley, and the Town of Truckee.
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
The TAC is made up of representatives of public transit operators, local public works and planning departments, public airport operators, the air pollution control district, and Caltrans. The Committee provides technical input on transportation issues and ensures there is coordination and cooperation in the transportation planning process.
Social Services Transportation Advisory Council (SSTAC) The SSTAC is made up of potential transit users who are representatives of the general public; seniors and/or disabled; social service providers for seniors, disabled, and persons of limited means; local social service and consolidated transportation providers; and Truckee residents who represent the senior and Latino communities. The goal of the SSTAC is to maintain and improve transportation services to the residents of Nevada County, particularly the underserved and under-represented members of the community, such as the elderly and disabled. The SSTAC recommends action to the Commission relative to the unmet transit needs findings, and advises the Commission on transit issues, including coordination and consolidation of specialized transportation services.
Airport Land Use Commissions (ALUCs)
The Nevada County Transportation Commission has been designated as the Airport Land Use Commission for the Nevada County Airport and provides staff for the Truckee Tahoe ALUC. The purpose of Airport Land Use Commissions is to protect public health, safety, and welfare by ensuring the orderly expansion of airports and adoption of land use measures that minimize the public’s exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards within the areas around the airports, to the extent that these areas are not already devoted to incompatible uses.
Nevada County Demographics
As of January 1, 2024, the population of Nevada County was estimated at 100,177. The largest municipality is Truckee with a population of 16,778, followed by Grass Valley at 13,400 and Nevada City at 3,347. The population of the unincorporated portion of the County was 66,652. The Race and Ethnicity data for Nevada County on Census.gov reported the racial makeup of the county as 83.7% White, followed by 10.2% Hispanic, 1.4% Asian,
1.0% Native American, 0.4% Black or African American, 0.1% Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander, and 3.4% Some Other Race. The data at Census.gov indicates that 11% of the population was below the poverty level.
Item # 4.
OVERALL WORK PROGRAM INTRODUCTION
NCTC annually adopts a budget through the preparation of an Overall Work Program (OWP). This work program includes specific “Work Elements” that describe the planning projects and associated activities that are to be conducted, and identifies the type of funds that will pay for the expenditures, such as Rural Planning Assistance (RPA), Local Transportation Funds (LTF), Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP), Planning, Programming, and Monitoring (PPM), or Federal Transit Administration (FTA). A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between NCTC, the Cities of Grass Valley and Nevada City, the Town of Truckee, and the County of Nevada provides the framework for NCTC’s coordination of regional transportation planning with local governments in Nevada County. The Commission staff prepares a draft OWP and in accordance with the MOU, solicits and integrates comments from each of the jurisdictions. The proposed work program is then submitted to the Commission for approval and forwarded to Caltrans. Caltrans, as the grantor of Rural Planning Assistance funds and Federal Transit Assistance funds, approves the OWP. The budget reflects the on-going regional transportation planning process in Nevada County. Major concerns of each of the jurisdictions and Caltrans are reflected in the elements and levels of funding. The OWP is updated each year to report on the progress of identified projects, propose new or continuing projects for the ensuing year, and to provide an estimate of the required funding of the OWP work elements.
Public Participation
Public involvement is a major component of the transportation planning and programming processes. NCTC makes a concerted effort to solicit public input from all Nevada County residents, including under- represented groups, in many aspects of transportation planning within Nevada County. Specific examples are listed below:
• NCTC maintains a website (www.nctc.ca.gov), a Facebook page, and a Twitter account to keep the public informed of transportation planning and programming efforts underway in Nevada County. Agendas are posted on the bulletin boards of local jurisdictions and emailed to mobile home parks, residential homeowners associations, senior centers, environmental advocates, associations representing the private sector, and individuals that have requested to be included on the distribution list. Citizens are encouraged to attend and speak at NCTC meetings on any matter included for discussion on the agenda at that meeting. • Articles on the preparation of the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP), as well as the public comment periods, are posted on the NCTC website. • Copies of the Draft RTP are made available for review at the main public libraries in western and eastern Nevada County, as well as on the NCTC website.
• Press releases are sent to the media establishments in western and eastern Nevada County announcing the Draft RTP is available for review and comment and noting some key findings. • Public hearings are held and noticed in the main newspapers in western and eastern Nevada County prior to adoption of the RTP and RTIP.
• Each year public notifications are sent out to encourage participation in transportation planning processes, such as the annual unmet transit needs public hearing and numerous public workshops relating to the transportation projects and planning activities of NCTC. • In accordance with AB52, NCTC conducts outreach and Tribal Consultation on any projects for which NCTC is lead agency and files a Notice of Preparation, Notice of Mitigated Negative Declaration or Notice of Negative Declaration. While there are currently no federally recognized tribes located within Nevada County, NCTC consults with the Native American Heritage Commission to identify Native American tribal organizations with historic or cultural interests regarding lands in Nevada County. These groups include but are not limited to the Nisenan of the Nevada City Rancheria and United Auburn Indian Community (UAIC). • NCTC consults with USDA Forest Service Tahoe National Forest and Bureau of Land Management.
I-3 Page 31
Item # 4.
Regional Issues, Needs, and Goals
The main transportation issues in western Nevada County are related to providing adequate multimodal transportation infrastructure and services to meet the needs of the County, while maintaining and enhancing the rural character and environmental qualities of the area. In western Nevada County, interregional traffic adds to the existing challenge and need to maintain and improve the transportation system.
In eastern Nevada County, the issues also stem from the challenges to meet the needs related to the high volumes of traffic generated by travelers taking advantage of the world-class recreational opportunities available in the Truckee-North Tahoe area. In addition to discretionary recreation demand travel, high housing costs have increased daily commuter trips into and out of the Truckee/North Tahoe region. To address these issues requires a multimodal and multijurisdictional approach to transportation planning in the region.
Acquiring adequate and timely funding for transportation improvements is the central need within all of the Nevada County issues. Implementation of highway and regional roadway improvements will be key to providing efficient operations, while improving safety and air quality. The 2020 Census reported that approximately 28.5% of the county population was over 65 years of age, between 2010 and 2020 that population increased from 19.6% to 28.5%, and it is projected that by 2030 this population is expected to increase to over 40%. As the population of residents over the age of 65 increases, it will result in increased demand for public transit services in Nevada County. Additional local, state, and federal transit operating and capital revenues, will be necessary in order to meet the additional demand placed on the public transit systems.
Transportation issues facing Nevada County which have been identified as regionally significant include the following:
• Insufficient state, federal, and local transportation revenues • Air quality/greenhouse gas emission reductions
• Coordination of land use, air quality, and transportation planning • Providing and maintaining a transportation system that enhances safety, the efficient movement of all people, goods, services, and information, and environmental quality • Efficient implementation of new technologies, including zero-emission bus fleets and charging technology
• High cost of housing and short-term rentals increasing commute trips and distances • Improvements to the regional transportation system to ensure safe and efficient emergency evacuation
Recognition of these issues leadsto the overall goal of the Regional Transportation Plan, which is to provide and maintain a transportation system that enhancessafety, the efficient movement of all people, goods, and services, and environmental quality. In the Policy Element this overarching goal is divided into the following four goals:
1) Provide for the safe and efficient movement of all people, goods, services, and information; 2) Reduce adverse impacts on the natural, social, cultural, and historical environment and the quality of life;
3) Develop an economically feasible multimodal transportation system; 4) Create and maintain a comprehensive, multi-modal transportation system to serve the needs of the County.
I-4 Page 32
Item # 4.
The following list of projects and planning efforts indicates progress made toward implementing the goals of the Regional Transportation Plan:
• Support of ongoing operation of Nevada County Connects, Truckee Tahoe Area Regional Transit, and associated paratransit services
• SR 49-La Barr Meadows Road Signalization and Widening project, constructed 2013 • SR 20/49 Dorsey Drive Interchange project, constructed 2014 • SR 49 Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvement project, constructed 2014 • SR 49 Signal Pre-emption, programmed 2012 STIP, constructed 2015/16 • SR 89 “Mousehole” Grade Separation, programmed 2012 STIP, constructed 2015/16 • Northeast Grass Valley Sidewalk Improvements, constructed 2015/16 • Newtown Road Class II/III Bike Lanes, constructed 2016/17 • Nevada County Active Transportation Plan, 2018/19
• SR 49 Multimodal Corridor Plan, 2019/20
• SR 174/20 Intersection Analysis, 2019/20
• NCTC Travel Demand Model Update, 2019/20
• Town of Truckee Transit Center Relocation Feasibility Study, 2020/21 • Western Nevada County Transit Development Plan 2021/22 • SR 49 Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan 2021/22
• SR 49-La Barr Meadows to McKnight Way, Environmental Impact Report 2021/22, Plans, Specifications, and Estimates 2023/24
• SR-49 Interstate 80 to McKnight Way Safety Needs Assessment 2021/22 • Ready Nevada County Extreme Climate Event Mobility and Adaptation Plan, 2021/22 • Legacy Trail – Brockway Multi-use Path, Construction 2021/22 • Legacy Trail Phase 4, Plans, Specifications, and Estimate, 2021/22 • Church Street Extension and Trout Creek Restoration, Plans Specifications, and Estimates 2021/22 • Truckee Railyard Mobility Hub, Right of Way Acquisition, Plans Specifications, and Estimate, 2022/23 • West River Streetscape Improvement Project, Plans, Specifications, and Estimate, 2022/23 • Town of Truckee Microtransit Feasibility Study 2022/23 • Coldstream/I-80 Off Ramp Roundabout, Construction 2022/23 • SR 20 Omega Curve Correction, Planning, Environmental, and Design completed. Construction completed target: December 2025.
• SR 49 Multi-modal Corridor Improvement Project was awarded $13.8 million from the Active Transportation Program, 2022/23. Construction to begin FY 2027/28. • SR 174/49/20 Roundabout and Active Transportation Safety Project was awarded $5.4 million from the Active Transportation Program, 2022/23. Construction to begin FY 2026/27. • SR 49 Corridor Improvement Project: 2023/24 - $14.6 million awarded of Trade Corridor Enhancement Program (TCEP) funding for southbound improvements between McKnight Way Interchange and La Barr Meadows Road. Construction to begin FY 2025/26.
• SR 49 Grass Valley Wildfire Evacuation Route Project: 2023/24 - $35 million awarded of Local Transportation Climate Adaptation Program (LTCAP) funding. Construction to begin FY 2027/28.
I-5
Item # 4.
Federal Planning Factors:
As shown in the chart below, the Federal Planning Factors have been integrated into NCTC’s FY 2026/27 OWP:
1. Support the economic vitality of the region, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency.
2. Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users.
3. Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users.
4. Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight.
5. Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth, housing, and economic development patterns.
6. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.
7. Promote efficient system management and operation.
8. Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
9. Improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surface transportation.
10. Enhance travel and tourism.
Planning Factors
WE
1.1 WE
1.2 WE
2.1 WE
2.1.3 WE
2.2 WE
2.3 WE
2.3.4 WE
2.3.5 WE
2.4 WE
2.4.2 Economic Vitality X X X X X X X X X
Safety X X X X X X X X
Security X X X X X X X
Accessibility X X X X X X X
Environment X X X X X X X
Connectivity X X X X X X X X
System Management &
Operation X X X X X X X X X X
Preservation X X X X X X X X
Resiliency & Reliability X X X X X X X X X
Travel & Tourism X X X X X X X
I-6
Item # 4.
NCTC 2026/27 Overall Work Program Draft – March 2026 1
WORK ELEMENT 1 – COMMUNICATION AND COORDINATION
Public involvement is a major component of NCTC’s planning process. The activities and products from Project 1.1, General Services and Communication, are intended to provide the public with complete information and timely notices, thereby giving full public access to key decisions.
Work Element 1 incorporates the following activities that are an integral part of accomplishing NCTC’s Mission:
NCTC interacts with the community through workshops, news media outlets, NCTC webpage, and social media platforms.
NCTC conducts a comprehensive planning process in the development of its annual Overall Work Program so that funds expended on planning projects will implement the goals of the RTP.
NCTC has the statutory responsibility to administer Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds, and to ensure that all expenditures of TDA funds are in conformity with the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). NCTC also administers funds received from the Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) and the Regional Transportation Mitigation Fee (RTMF) program. The work performed under Project 1.2, Fiscal Administration, has been incorporated into the NCTC Mission as follows:
NCTC administers Transportation Development Act funds to ensure all statutory requirements are met, including the identification of the region’s transit needs. NCTC manages Regional Surface Transportation Program funds, Regional Transportation Mitigation Fee funds and Regional Improvement Program funds in accordance with Federal acts and statutes promulgated by the State of California, selecting and funding eligible transportation improvement projects based upon those that are most effective and beneficial to the region.
Through communication, collaboration, and public outreach activities, Work Element 1 incorporates the ten Federal Planning Factors (see page I-6) into the NCTC planning program.
Information and data developed through these activities are included in the Regional Transportation Plan and in transit planning documents.
Item # 4.
NCTC 2026/27 Overall Work Program Draft – March 2026 2
WORK ELEMENT 1 – COMMUNICATION AND COORDINATION (continued) Project 1.1 – General Services and Communication
Purpose: Conduct communication and public outreach activities. Provide administrative and financial support for the operation of the Nevada County Transportation Commission and its advisory committees through the activities listed below.
Additional/Continuing Work:
• Public information and outreach activities (LTF)
• Preparation of agendas, minutes, notices, and correspondence (LTF) • Track legislation pertinent to the transportation planning process (LTF) • Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) activities (LTF)
• Provide staff services to SSTAC (LTF)
• Personnel administration (LTF)
• Maintain and update the NCTC website (LTF)
• Office lease (LTF)
• Purchase equipment (LTF)
• Maintain the Commission’s office and equipment (LTF)
• Press releases and social media platforms (LTF)
• Reports on legislative measures and monitor legislation that impacts transportation planning. (LTF) • Update Conflict of Interest Code (LTF)
• Update DBE Program (LTF)
• Coordination with public safety agencies regarding the safety and security of the transportation system (LTF)
• Coordinate implementation of projects in the Regional Transportation Mitigation Fee (RTMF) Program. (LTF)
• Work with Nevada County, Grass Valley, and Nevada City to implement projects included in the multi-year Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) project listing. (LTF) • Apply for FTA planning grants. (LTF)
• Annual Legislative Platform (LTF)
Products:
• Documentation of Commission and/or TAC meetings (Bimonthly) • Executive Director’s Reports (Bimonthly)
• Personnel reviews (Annual)
Budget 1.1
Revenues:
LTF $432,440.29
RTMF $7,500.00
Total $439,940.29
Expenditures:
Staff $328,710.04
Indirect $53,230.25
Consulting $58,000.00
Total $439,940.29
Totals may not equal addition of amounts in columns due to rounding.
Indirect costs are paid with local funds (see Budget Table 5).
Item # 4.
NCTC 2026/27 Overall Work Program Draft – March 2026 3
WORK ELEMENT 1 – COMMUNICATION AND COORDINATION (continued) Project 1.2 – Fiscal Administration
Purpose: Administer funds held by NCTC in accordance with the provisions of the TDA Guidelines and State and Federal requirements through the activities listed below.
Previous Work:
• Develop and oversee Overall Work Program and annual budgets • Oversee fiscal and performance audits, as required
• Provide assistance to claimants in completing claims and resolving audit findings and/or recommendations
• Preparation of State Controller’s Annual Report
• Annual “Unmet Transit Needs” public hearing (SSTAC)
• Preparation of monthly financial reports
• Review and process claims for TDA funds
• Reports to Caltrans regarding FTA grants and RPA funds • Update transportation/transit claim guidelines and forms • Administer the Regional Surface Transportation Program • Accounting/payroll
• Coordination of community transit services and funding with Consolidated Transportation Service Agencies
• Triennial Performance Audit for FYs 2021/22, 2022/23, and 2023/24 Additional/Continuing Work:
• Develop and oversee Overall Work Program and annual budgets (LTF) • Oversee fiscal and performance audits, as required (LTF) • Provide assistance to claimants in completing claims and resolving audit findings and/or recommendations (LTF)
• Preparation of State Controller’s Annual Report (LTF) • Annual “Unmet Transit Needs” public hearing (LTF)
• Preparation of monthly financial reports (LTF)
• Review and process claims for TDA funds (LTF)
• Reports to Caltrans regarding FTA grants and RPA funds (LTF) • Update transportation/transit claim guidelines and forms (LTF) • Administer the Regional Transportation Mitigation Fee Program (RTMF) • Administer the Regional Surface Transportation Program (LTF) • Accounting/payroll (LTF)
• Coordination of community transit services and funding with Consolidated Transportation Service Agencies (LTF)
• Administer Federal Transit Administration revenues (5311, Cares Act, and CRRSAA) (LTF) • Monitor ridership, expenditures, and revenue data for each system. (LTF) • Check operational performance indicators for each system. (LTF) • Coordination of the Social Services Transportation Advisory Council (SSTAC) (LTF) Products:
• Closeout FY 2025/26 OWP (Sept 26)
• State Controller’s Annual Report (Dec 26)
• Manage FY 2026/27 Overall Work Program (July 26-June 27)
Item # 4.
NCTC 2026/27 Overall Work Program Draft – March 2026 4
WORK ELEMENT 1 – COMMUNICATION AND COORDINATION (continued) Project 1.2 – Fiscal Administration (continued)
Products (cont.):
• Draft FY 2027/28 Overall Work Program (Mar 27)
• Final FY 2027/28 Overall Work Program (May 27)
• Completed Fiscal and Compliance Audit (Mar 27)
• Accounting Reports/Payroll/Payment Authorizations/Tax Reports (Ongoing) • Financial reports (Monthly)
• Findings of Apportionment (Feb 27)
Budget 1.2
Totals may not equal addition of amounts in columns due to rounding Indirect costs are paid with local funds (see Budget Table 5).
Revenues:
LTF $585,537.39
Total $585,537.39
Expenditures:
Staff $446,476.43
Indirect $72,300.96
Fiscal Audits $66,760.00
Total $585,537.39
Item # 4.
NCTC 2026/27 Overall Work Program Draft – March 2026 5
WORK ELEMENT 2 – REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
NCTC has the responsibility to prepare and adopt a Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) directed to the achievement of a coordinated and balanced regional transportation system. The plan is to be action-oriented and pragmatic, considering both the short-and-long term future, and is to present clear, concise policy guidance to local and state officials. Projects 2.1 (Transportation Planning),
2.1.31 (Nevada County Active Transportation Plan Update), 2.2 (Transportation Improvement Programs), 2.3 (Transit and Paratransit Programs), and 2.4 (Coordination of Regional Planning), are tied to the NCTC Mission by the following activities:
NCTC develops a Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) which includes the actions, funding recommendations, and policy direction necessary to meet the needs of each transportation system component in the region.
NCTC develops and adopts a Regional Transportation Improvement Program that is consistent with the RTP.
NCTC reviews transportation plans and programs of member agencies and endorses them based on consistency with the RTP and RTIP. In keeping with this responsibility, the NCTC strives to be creative in assisting the region in developing the revenues to construct improvement projects.
NCTC communicates and participates in workshops with Caltrans on proposed projects to be developed in the County of Nevada to ensure that the policies and goals of the RTP are implemented.
NCTC coordinates with regional transportation planning agencies on legislation and statewide policy issues to ensure the region receives appropriate attention and funding from the State of California and the Federal government. NCTC participates in interregional planning projects to ensure Nevada County projects support both regional and statewide transportation goals.
The following activities and products included in Work Element 2 are appropriate uses of Rural Planning Assistance Funds:
Participate in Federal and State Clean Air Act transportation related air quality planning activities. (Projects 2.1 and 2.2)
Develop and/or modify tools that allow for better assessment of transportation impacts on community livability and emergency preparedness (e.g. integration of GIS and census data into the regional traffic model and development of performance measurement tools and strategies). (Projects 2.1 and 2.4)
Identify and document transportation facilities, projects, and services required to meet the regional and interregional mobility and access needs. (Projects 2.1, 2.1.3, 2.2, and 2.3) Define solutions and implementation issues in terms of the multimodal transportation system, land use and economic impacts, financial constraints, air quality and environmental concerns (including wetlands, endangered species, and cultural resources). (Projects 2.1, 2.1.3, and 2.2) Assess the operational and physical continuity of transportation system components within and between metropolitan and rural areas, and interconnections to and through regions. (Projects
2.1, 2.1.3, 2.3, and 2.4)
Item # 4.
NCTC 2026/27 Overall Work Program Draft – March 2026 6
WORK ELEMENT 2 – REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING (continued) Conduct transit needs public hearings and prepare transit development plans and transit marketing plans as appropriate. (Project 2.3)
Investigate methods to reduce vehicle travel and methods to expand and enhance travel services. (Projects 2.1.3, 2.3, and 2.4)
Incorporate transit and intermodal facilities, bicycle transportation facilities, and pedestrian walkways in projects where appropriate. (Projects 2.1, 2.1.3, 2.2 and 2.3) Participate with regional, local and state agencies, the general public, and the private sector in planning efforts to identify and implement policies, strategies, programs and actions that maximize and implement the regional transportation infrastructure. (Projects 2.1, 2.1.3, 2.2,
2.3, and 2.4)
Conduct collaborative public participation efforts to further extend transportation planning to communities previously not engaged in discussion. (Project 2.1, 2.1.3, and 2.3) Create, strengthen, and use partnerships to facilitate and conduct regional planning activities between Caltrans, RTPAs, Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), transit districts, cities, counties, the private sector, and other stakeholders. (All WE 2 Projects) Use partners to identify and implement policies, strategies, programs and actions that enhance the movement of people, goods, services, and information. (Projects 2.1, 2.1.3, and 2.3) Ensure that projects developed at the regional level are compatible with statewide and interregional transportation needs. (Projects 2.2 and 2.4) Conduct planning and project activities (including corridor studies, and other transportation planning studies) to identify, develop, and monitor current and future STIP projects. (Projects
2.1 and 2.2)
Implement ways to meet transportation needs by using existing transportation facilities more efficiently. Encourage owners and operators of transportation facilities/systems to work together to develop operational objectives and plans maximizing utilization of existing facilities. (Projects 2.1, 2.3 and 2.4)
Document environmental and cultural resources and develop and improve coordination between agencies using Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Intelligent Transportation Management Systems (ITMS), and other computer-based tools. (Projects 2.1, 2.1.3, and 2.4) Work Element 2, Regional Transportation Planning, incorporates the ten Federal Planning Factors into the NCTC planning program (see page I-6).
Monitoring safety and operational data of transportation facilities and services in Projects 2.1 and
2.3 will aid NCTC efforts to incorporate “safety” and “security” within the planning process.
Through expanded Technical Advisory Committee meetings, transportation planning will be coordinated with emergency preparedness plans in the region. Systems management and operational data will be used to identify opportunities to increase transit ridership and develop operational improvements for regional transportation facilities. Management and operations data will also be key components in guiding capital investment plans for regional transportation system facilities and services. Planning activities will include coordination with nonemergency human service transportation providers. NCTC will also provide information to regional transit operators to ensure appropriate safety, security, and operational training opportunities are provided.
Item # 4.
NCTC 2026/27 Overall Work Program Draft – March 2026 7
WORK ELEMENT 2 – REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING (continued) Project 2.1 – Transportation Planning
Purpose: Regional planning and implementation, monitoring the regional transportation system, and implementation of the Regional Transportation Plan through the activities listed below. • Update travel demand models and circulation plans.
• Coordinate the RTP with Caltrans planning documents.
• Coordinate the RTP with county, town, and city general plans. • Complete planning studies on projects in the RTP to be programmed in the RTIP. • Plan and coordinate local, regional, state, and federal funding for RTP projects (e.g., RTMF, STIP, RSTP, SHOPP, CMAQ, and federal grants).
Previous Work:
• NCTC staff participated in meetings and workshops related to current State funding opportunities and provided input on State guidelines development and eligibility requirements for future grant funding cycles.
• NCTC staff participated in an I-80 Focus Group meeting with Nevada County OES and Sheriff’s Office Staff, Truckee CHP, Truckee Fire, Caltrans and various affected local agencies to discuss short-term coordination, evacuation and detouring issues, and long-term Planning Opportunities to be prepared for future disasters.
• NCTC staff continued collecting and analyzing freight data on SR 49 in relation to I-80 emergency detours and continued coordinating with Caltrans District 3 to discuss potential wildfire evacuation climate adaptation projects that could help to reduce evacuation times in the SR 49 corridor. • NCTC Staff researched and participated in meetings regarding evacuation initiatives and current climate related impacts.
• NCTC staff continued to meet with Nevada County OES staff and consultant firm Ladris to discuss evacuation routes and emergency evacuation scenarios and simulations. • NCTC and the Nevada County Office of Emergency Services continued to discuss coordination and partnership opportunities in relation to a mutual desire to conduct coordinated wildfire/ evacuation research with the University of California Los Angeles Environmental Engineering Department utilizing western Nevada County as a test bed region for the testing and further development of the latest technical modeling platforms. • NCTC staff also participated in meetings with Nevada County OES regarding other current evacuation planning initiatives underway.
• NCTC coordinated with Caltrans District 3 Safety Division to analyze and review accident data in the SR 20 corridor between Grass Valley and the Yuba County line. • NCTC monitored the development and status of all Caltrans projects located within the boundaries of the SR 49 Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP) and monitored accident data for regional roadways within Nevada County.
• NCTC continued to identify opportunities to enhance its public engagement activities and outreach efforts by expanding its social media footprint and identified disadvantaged and vulnerable community groups, in an effort to better serve those communities. • NCTC staff prepared and issued a Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) and Carbon Reduction Program (CRP) call for projects and reviewed the project applications and prepared preliminary rankings. Staff also coordinated with the Technical Advisory Committee to discuss draft funding recommendations.
Item # 4.
NCTC 2026/27 Overall Work Program Draft – March 2026 8
WORK ELEMENT 2 – REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING (continued) Project 2.1 – Transportation Planning (continued)
• NCTC staff met with partnering agencies to discuss options for funding all submitted applications for CMAQ and CRP projects.
• NCTC staff coordinated with Caltrans to explore opportunities to implement the SR 49 Corridor System Management Plan and monitor existing traffic conditions and safety data. NCTC staff continue to monitor the development and status of all Caltrans projects located within the boundaries of the SR 49 Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP) and work with the design team to minimize right-of-way impacts.
• NCTC staff coordinated with Caltrans and CTC on the $35 million funding awarded for the SR 49 Grass Valley Evacuation Route Project to widen Highway 49 between Ponderosa Pines Way and Wolf Road.
Additional/Continuing Work:
• Monitor implementation of the Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan (CMCP) recommendations. (NCTC) (RPA, & PPM)
• Solicit input from citizens and transportation stakeholders, including the Native American community, disadvantaged communities, and agencies regarding transportation issues. (NCTC) (RPA)
• Update capital improvement needs lists. (NCTC) (RPA) & PPM) • Coordinate with the Town of Truckee’s update of the Trails Master Plan (NCTC)(RPA) • Coordinate with the City of Nevada City on the preparation of the City’s Active Transportation, Trails, and Complete Streets Master Plan (NCTC)(RPA)
• Work with Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District (NSAQMD) to determine air quality impacts of regional transportation plans and improvement programs. (NCTC) (RPA) • NCTC staff will continue to coordinate with Caltrans, the Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District and other agencies regarding planning related to the Federal 8-hour ozone standards and air quality conformity. (NCTC) (RPA)
• Develop information to evaluate goods movement impacts on the region’stransportation system and consider air quality issues related to goods movement. (NCTC) (RPA, & PPM). • Update Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) data. (NCTC) (RPA, & PPM) • Incorporate local agency transportation CIPs and master plans into the RTP and RTIP as appropriate. (NCTC) (RPA, & PPM)
• Assist member agencies with review and update of transportation capital improvement programs (CIPs) and master plans. (NCTC) (RPA, & PPM)
• Update traffic model land use files. (NCTC) (RPA, & PPM) • Participate in updates of Nevada County, Truckee, Grass Valley, Nevada City General Plans. (NCTC) (RPA, & PPM)
• Conduct and update planning studies as needed for regional projects identified by NCTC, TAC, and member agencies. (NCTC) (RPA, & PPM)
• Analyze alternative growth scenarios and report on related infrastructure needs and costs. (NCTC) (RPA, & PPM)
• Identify Right-of-Way needed for future transportation projects. (NCTC) (RPA, & PPM) • Conduct technical studies necessary to support policies and projects included in the RTP. (NCTC) (RPA, & PPM)
Item # 4.
NCTC 2026/27 Overall Work Program Draft – March 2026 9
WORK ELEMENT 2 – REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING (continued) Project 2.1 – Transportation Planning (continued)
• Work with Nevada County’s GIS staff to ensure the following airport information is included in the GIS database: airport locations, airport boundaries, noise contours, airport influence area, and ground access routes to airports. (NCTC) (RPA)
• Coordinate with public safety agencies. (NCTC) (RPA)
• Local participation in regional planning and updating traffic counts (NCTC, Grass Valley, Nevada City, Town of Truckee, Nevada County) (RPA)
• Monitor existing traffic conditions and safety data. (NCTC) (RPA) • Coordinate with Caltrans to develop and implement performance measures in the regional planning process. (NCTC) (RPA)
• Coordinate with Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District (NSAQMD) and California Air Resources Board (CARB) to assist in development of the Statewide Implementation Plan (SIP) for western Nevada County. (NCTC) (RPA)
• Review and compare the California State Transportation Agency Final Climate Action Plan for Transportation Infrastructure (CAPTI) to the RTP policies, regional needs, and projects to determine if the projects align with proposed investment strategies. (NCTC) (RPA) • When developing regional transportation projects and updating planning documents, NCTC will consider and incorporate transit services, intermodal facilities, and pedestrian bicycle facilities whenever appropriate. (NCTC) (RPA)
• Planning activities related to CMAQ program including preparation and releasing of call for projects, review and ranking applications, project selection, and programming. (NCTC) (RPA) • Coordinate review of safety and design concerns of state highway projects. (NCTC) (RPA & PPM) • Identify and analyze issues relating to integration of regional transportation and community goals and objectives in land use, housing, economic development, social welfare and environmental preservation. (NCTC) (RPA)
• SB743 VMT Forecasting Tool and Web Hosting. (NCTC/Consultant) (PPM) • Analyze climate related impacts to the transportation system and identify strategies to address resiliency. (NCTC) (RPA)
• Coordinate and monitor the implementation of the Caltrans District 3 SR 20 Corridor Plan. (RPA) Products:
• Documentation of Air Quality Conformity Process (As Needed) • Traffic count updates (Annual)
• Reports on new issues and projects to be included in the RTP (Annual) • Progress reports on project planning activities (Bimonthly) Budget 2.1
Revenues:
LTF $19,497.27
LTF Carryover $95,923.14
STIP Planning PPM $75,000.00
Total $190,420.41
Expenditures:
Staff $55,923.14
Indirect $19,497.27
Transportation Eng $75,000.00
Local Agency $30,000.00
Traffic Counts $10,000.00
Total $190,420.41
Totals may not equal addition of amounts in columns due to rounding Indirect costs are paid with local funds (see Budget Table 5).
Item # 4.
NCTC 2026/27 Overall Work Program Draft – March 2026 10 WORK ELEMENT 2 – REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING (continued) Project 2.1.3 – Nevada County Active Transportation Plan Update Purpose: Preparation of the Nevada County Active Transportation Plan (ATP) Update, including jurisdiction specific updates supporting a connected regional active transportation network. This project, once completed, will assist the jurisdictions to secure funding and implement active transportation projects that improve bicycle and pedestrian safety, accessibility, connectivity, and mobility. This planning effort will be coordinated with the development of the City of Nevada City’s Active Transportation, Trails, and Complete Streets Master Plan and the development of the Town of Truckee’s Active Transportation Plan and incorporate the planning efforts.
Previous Work:
• Nevada County Active Transportation Plan, 2019
• Truckee Trails & Bikeways Master Plan, 2015
Additional Work Activities:
• Prepare and distribute a Request for Proposal to qualified consultants (NCTC) (RPA) • Establish Project Selection Committee and Project Advisory Committee (NCTC) (RPA) • Review and rank proposals, conduct oral interviews, and finalize consultant ranking (NCTC) (RPA)
• Select consultant and execute contract (NCTC) (RPA)
• Finalize the work program and refine scope of work (NCTC) (RPA) • Project meetings and coordination (NCTC/Consultant) (RPA) • Project Advisory Committee activities (NCTC/Consultant) (RPA) • Project support and administration of grant (NCTC) (RPA) • Project initiation and data collection (NCTC/Consultant) (RPA) • Prepare quarterly reports and invoices (NCTC) (RPA)
• Consolidate relevant elements of existing plans, reports, and studies, as well as ongoing planning efforts into the Active Transportation Plan (NCTC/Consultant) (RPA) • Identify, map, and evaluate existing active transportation facilities and primary gaps (Consultant) (RPA)
• Improve social equity through the identification of priority areas for disadvantaged, underserved, and underrepresented communities utilizing the regionally disadvantaged communities definition adopted in the 2045 Nevada County Regional Transportation Plan (Consultant) (RPA) • Integrate existing public transportation systems and access to schools with active transportation projects (Consultant) (RPA)
• Public outreach activities (NCTC/Consultant) (RPA)
• Develop a recommended implementation plan and identify funding sources for the construction of projects (Consultant) (RPA)
• Preparation and presentation of the draft Active Transportation Plan (NCTC/Consultant) (RPA) • Modify draft Active Transportation Plan and prepare final plan (Consultant) (RPA) Products:
• Release RFP (July 26)
• Technical Memoranda (Dec. 26)
• Draft Report (May 27)
• Final Report (Sept. 27)
Item # 4.
NCTC 2026/27 Overall Work Program Draft – March 2026 11 Budget 2.1.3
Revenues:
LTF $64,477.36
RPA Formula $275,000.00
Total $339,477.36
Expenditures:
Staff $64,477.36
Consulting $275,000.00
Total $339,477.36
Totals may not equal sum of amounts in column due to rounding.
Item # 4.
NCTC 2026/27 Overall Work Program Draft – March 2026 12 WORK ELEMENT 2 – REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING (continued) Project 2.2 – Transportation Improvement Programs
Purpose: To monitor implementation of the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) and Interregional Transportation Improvement Program (ITIP) funding and provide policy analysis and recommendations regarding the RTIP and the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) through the activities listed below.
Previous Work:
• NCTC continued interagency coordination to identify and consider new RTIP projects and the need for future Project Initiation Documents.
• NCTC staff continued to monitor STIP projects and implementation of NCTC’s Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP).
• NCTC staff continued coordination as a member of the project development team and attended regular meetings with Caltrans Project Management regarding the SR 49 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP) and Caltrans SHOPP project 4E170 and 3H510. • NCTC staff continued coordination as a member of the project development team and attended regular meetings with Caltrans Project Management regarding the SR 49 Grass Valley Evacuation Route Project 4J110.
• NCTC staff continued coordination with Caltrans to identify incremental projects to accelerate safety improvements in the SR 49 corridor between Grass Valley and the Combie Road/Wolf Road intersection.
• Begin preparation of draft 2026 RTIP – October 2025 (NCTC) (RPA & LTF) • Public hearing and adoption of 2026 RTIP – November 2025 (NCTC) (RPA& LTF) • Submittal of 2026 RTIP to the CTC – December 2025 (NCTC) (RPA & LTF) • NCTC will continue to participate with Caltrans District 3 in the preparation of the Design and Right-of-Way phases for the proposed improvements on SR 49 from La Barr Meadows Road to McKnight Way. (NCTC) (RPA & LTF)
Additional/Continuing Work:
• Participation in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Guidelines workshop. (NCTC) (RPA & LTF)
• NCTC staff will continue to work closely with Caltrans District 3 and Headquarters staff on Climate Adaptation projects that can be incorporated into the transportation infrastructure network within Nevada County. (NCTC) (RPA & LTF)
• Monitor STIP implementation. (NCTC) (RPA & LTF)
• Encourage interagency coordination necessary to identify and develop new RTIP and ITIP projects. (NCTC) (RPA & LTF)
• Communicate and coordinate with Caltrans to identify and implement incremental projects to accelerate the safety improvements to the SR 49 corridor between Grass Valley and the Combie/Wolf Road intersection. (NCTC) (RPA & LTF)
• Coordinate with Caltrans regarding Interregional Transportation Improvement Program (ITIP) participation in STIP funded projects in Nevada County. (NCTC) (RPA & LTF) • Review and comment on ITIP funding criteria proposed in the Caltrans Strategic Investment Strategy (CSIS). (NCTC) (RPA & LTF)
• Review consistency of future RTIP projects with the Climate Action Plan for Transportation Infrastructure 2.0 and California Transportation Plan 2050 (NCTC) (RPA & LTF) • SR 49 Grass Valley Evacuation Route Project: NCTC will continue to participate in the preparation of the Project Approval/Environmental Documentation and Plans, Specifications, and Estimates and Right-of-Way for a future construction project.
Item # 4.
NCTC 2026/27 Overall Work Program Draft – March 2026 13 WORK ELEMENT 2 – REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING (continued) Project 2.2 – Transportation Improvement Programs (continued) Products:
• Status reports on Nevada County’s STIP projects (Bimonthly) • Reports regarding implementation of the Nevada County RTIP (Ongoing) • Reports on implementation of Caltrans SR 49 Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plan (Ongoing)
Budget 2.2
Revenues:
LTF $13,596.35
RPA Formula $83,960.85
Total $97,557.20
Expenditures: Staff $83,960.85
Indirect $13,596.35
Total $97,557.20
Totals may not equal addition of amounts in columns due to rounding
Item # 4.
NCTC 2026/27 Overall Work Program Draft – March 2026 14 WORK ELEMENT 2 – REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING (continued) Project 2.3 – Transit and Paratransit Programs
Purpose: Work with city, county, and town staff to improve efficiency, productivity, and cost effectiveness of existing transit and paratransit systems through the activities listed below.
Previous Work:
• NCTC staff continued to work with the Nevada County Transit Services Division to examine capital funding opportunities for planned improvements to the Nevada County Transit Operations Center and plans for Zero Emission Bus transition. • NCTC staff also coordinated with Nevada County Transit Services to develop a proposed scope of work for a Comprehensive Operational Analysis to analyze the current fixed route/ paratransit delivery model and examine alternative delivery options, such as demand response (i.e. micro-transit or dial-a-ride), micro-mobility options (i.e. electric bike and scooter share programs), and to determine the most cost-effective way to provide enhanced mobility. • NCTC staff continued to work with the Town of Truckee to identify funding opportunities for long-term implementation of the Town’s microtransit pilot and construction of the new Transit Center at the Truckee Railyard.
• NCTC staff coordinated with the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency, Tahoe Regional Transportation Planning Agency, Washoe County Transportation Commission, Nevada County, Placer County, and Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Agency to explore opportunities to coordinate to help advance the mutual goal of expanding passenger rail service to Truckee/Reno and develop last mile transit connections. • NCTC staff monitored transit and paratransit statistics and compliance with the requirements of the TDA and participated in the Mobility Action Partners (/MAPCO) group and Social Service Transportation Advisory Council (SSTAC).
• NCTC staff also assisted transit operators with administrative challenges related to Cares Act and CRRSAA funding.
• NCTC staff coordinated and participated in the monthly Truckee Convene, Champion & Catalyze (CCC) meetings established by the Board of Supervisors, to discuss the Truckee area transportation/transit issues and improvement plans.
• Coordinated with Town on public polling effort in consideration of 2024 Transportation -Transit Ballot Measure
• Conducted the FY 2025/26 annual Unmet Transit Needs process. • Coordinated with Nevada County Transit Services Division and the Town of Truckee to submit SB 125 Allocation Request.
• Monitored the implementation of SB 125 funded projects.
Additional/Continuing Work Activities:
• Assist in implementation of Transit Development Plans and Nevada County Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan. (NCTC) (RPA & LTF) • Hold planning meetings with transit and paratransit providers. (NCTC) (RPA & LTF) • Develop and present information regarding alternative forms of transportation that are practical for Nevada County. (NCTC) (RPA & LTF)
• Coordinate with human service transportation providers. (NCTC) (RPA & LTF) • Distribute press releases and other educational information regarding alternative forms of transportation. (NCTC) (RPA & LTF)
• Participate on the Mobility Action Partners Coalition. (NCTC) (RPA & LTF)
Item # 4.
NCTC 2026/27 Overall Work Program Draft – March 2026 15 WORK ELEMENT 2 – REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING (continued) Project 2.3 – Transit and Paratransit Programs (continued) • Assist transit operators with feasibility analysis of transit electrification mandate. (NCTC) (RPA & LTF)
• Conduct the FY 2026/27 annual Unmet Transit Needs process (NCTC) (LTF & RPA) • Conduct planning to identify opportunities to enhance and integrate multimodal connectivity. (NCTC) (LTF & RPA)
• Identify opportunities and challenges associated with transition to a zero-emission transit fleet. (NCTC) (LTF & RPA)
• Planning and coordination with transit operators in the development of grant applications for the Transit Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) competitive program. (NCTC) (LTF & RPA) Products:
• Reports to the Commission regarding staff participation in the transit and paratransit planning processes (Bimonthly)
• Quarterly ridership, expenditure, and revenue reports for each system • Quarterly operational performance reports for each system • Bi-monthly minutes of the Mobility Action Partners Coalition.
Budget 2.3
Revenues:
LTF $17,942.73
RPA Formula $56,111.19
Total $74,083.61
Expenditures:
Staff $56,111.19
Indirect $17,942.73
Total $74,083.61
Totals may not equal addition of amounts in columns due to rounding Indirect costs are paid with local funds (see Budget Table 5).
Item # 4.
NCTC 2026/27 Overall Work Program Draft – March 2026 16 WORK ELEMENT 2 – REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING (continued) Project 2.3.4 – Reenvisioning Transit in Western Nevada County/Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA)
Purpose: The Reenvisioning Transit in Western Nevada County / Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA) will comprehensively review the existing transit services offered and identify areas and opportunities to transition to alternative operating models to provide greater system efficiency and ridership benefits. Similar to many other transit systems across the nation, Nevada County Connects (fixed route transit service) has not rebounded from the impacts of the COVID 19 Pandemic and it is imperative to identify the most cost effective and efficient services with the limited operational funding streams available to meet the needs of the residents and visitors of Western Nevada County. NCTC will manage this study in coordination with Nevada County Connects, the Cities of Nevada City and Grass Valley, key stakeholders, and residents to capture the vision that most successfully explores the relationships between effective transit and land-use, population growth and employment patterns, as well as social equity and areas of high transit need. The COA will generate recommendations based on extensive data analysis, public outreach, and industry best practices for deploying various public transportation modes and integrating with the Statewide Transit and Rail Plans, and the COA shall consider an entire spectrum of service options ranging from minor modifications to a full “reset” of the system. These options may include traditional fixed route service, dial-a-ride service, micro-transit service, micromobility options, and/or a combination to address the challenges of meeting the transit needs outside the fixed route/ADA service areas and outlying communities.
Previous Work:
• NCTC staff prepare and distribute a Request for Proposals to qualified consultants to prepare the COA. (NCTC) (FTA 5304/RPA)
• NCTC review proposals, select consultant, and execute contract to prepare the COA. (NCTC) (FTA 5304/RPA)
Additional/Continuing Work Activities:
• Project support and administration of grant. (NCTC/Consultant) (FTA 5304 & RPA) • Project meetings and coordination. (NCTC/Consultant) (FTA 5304 & RPA) • Project Advisory Committee (PAC) activities. (NCTC/Consultant) (FTA 5304 & RPA) • Public outreach activities. (NCTC/Consultant) (FTA 5304 & RPA) • Collect baseline information/data. (NCTC/Consultant) (FTA 5304 & RPA) • System Analysis (Consultant) (FTA 5304 & RPA)
• Development of Financial Plan. (Consultant) (FTA 5304 & RPA) • Development of Draft Report (Consultant) (FTA 5304 & RPA) • Presentation of Draft Report (NCTC/Consultant) (FTA 5304 & RPA) • Development of Final Report (Consultant) (FTA 5304 & RPA) • Presentation of Final Report (NCTC/Consultant) (FTA 5304 & RPA)
Item # 4.
NCTC 2026/27 Overall Work Program Draft – March 2026 17 WORK ELEMENT 2 – REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING (continued) Products:
• Existing Conditions Working paper (March 26)
• Financial Plan (June 26)
• Draft Comprehensive Operational Analysis COA (July 26) • Final Comprehensive Operational Analysis COA (Sept. 26) Budget 2.3.4
Revenues:
RPA Formula $44,498.26
Strategic Partnership Grant
(FTA 5304)
$170,000.00
Total $214,498.26
Expenditures:
Staff $44,498.26
Consulting $170,000.00
Total $214,498.26
Item # 4.
NCTC 2026/27 Overall Work Program Draft – March 2026 18 WORK ELEMENT 2 – REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING (continued)
Project 2.3.5 – SB 125 Transit Planning and Administration Purpose: Monitor usage of SB 125 funding and implementation of SB 125 funded projects.
Work Activities:
• Administration of Senate Bill (SB) 125 funding
• Monitor implementation of SB 125 funded projects.
• Develop a SB 125 Long-term Financial Plan in coordination with Nevada County Transit Services Division and the Town of Truckee. (SB 125)
Products:
• Prepare monthly financial reports regarding SB 125 funds. • Prepare amendments to the SB 125 Program of Projects as needed.
Budget 2.3.5
Revenues:
SB 125 $110,374.75
Total $110,374.75
Expenditures:
Staff $10,374.75
Consulting $100,000.00
Total $110,374.75
Item # 4.
NCTC 2026/27 Overall Work Program Draft – March 2026 19 WORK ELEMENT 2 – REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING (continued) Project 2.4 – Coordination of Regional Planning
Purpose: Enhance NCTC’s regional planning efforts through the following activities:
• Coordinate local land use planning with regional transportation planning. • Analyze regional transportation impacts of proposed development projects, including VMT. • Improve Transportation Systems Management (TSM) and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) efforts in the region.
• Provide for Commission participation in studies done by other agencies. • Promote cooperation between regional planning agencies. • Promote regional transportation services (e.g. connections to Capitol Corridor rail service). • Participate and coordinate in regional evacuation planning efforts.
Previous Work:
• Review of local development projects and environmental documents. • Traffic model analyses of development projects, and modifications to regional and local transportation facilities proposed by public agencies.
• Study to extend Capitol Corridor train service to Truckee/Tahoe area. • Participate in the SR 49 Corridor Study with Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA) and Caltrans.
• Participate with Caltrans and RTPAs to pursue rail projects that will improve goods movement and enhance passenger rail service.
• Work with the Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District (NSAQMD) to develop and implement transportation control measures consistent with the region’s air quality non-attainment plan and Regional Transportation Plan.
• In conjunction with PCTPA and Caltrans, actively pursue, develop, and implement funding for SR 49 corridor improvements.
• Coordinate with member agencies to reestablish and enhance Transportation Demand Management (TDM) programs in Nevada County.
• Assist with modeling and traffic analyses as requested by jurisdictions and approved by NCTC. • Analyze transportation impacts of development proposals. • Analyze proposed modifications to city and county land use plans. • Review updates of the Circulation and Land Use Elements of General Plansfor the Town of Truckee to ensure consistency with the adopted Airport Land Use Compatibility Plans (ALUCPs) for the Truckee Tahoe airport.
• Participate in inter-regional planning projects (e.g. North State Super Region (NSSR), I-80 Corridor Management Plan, and Trans-Sierra Transportation Coalition). • Participated with PCTPA and Caltrans to develop update of Sacramento to Reno Passenger Rail Service Planning Study – Truckee/Tahoe/Reno.
• Conducted Zion St. Mobility/School Access Study in Nevada City.
Item # 4.
NCTC 2026/27 Overall Work Program Draft – March 2026 20 WORK ELEMENT 2 – REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING (continued) Project 2.4 – Coordination of Regional Planning (continued) Additional/Continuing Work:
• Participate in Regional Transportation Planning Agency group meetings, California Rural Counties Task Force, and North State Super Region meetings. (NCTC) (LTF) • Participate in Federal and State Clean Air Act transportation related air quality planning activities. (NCTC) (LTF)
• Participate in the Truckee/North Tahoe Transportation Management Association (TNT/TMA) and Resort Triangle Transportation Planning Coalition (RTTPC) meetings. (NCTC) (LTF) • Review and comment on Caltrans Systems Plans and related documents. (NCTC) (LTF) • Coordination with the Nevada County Economic Resource Council. (NCTC) (LTF) • Monitor and review planning efforts in Grass Valley, Nevada City, Nevada County, Truckee. (LTF) • Present information to local civic groups regarding regional transportation planning. (NCTC) (LTF) • Participate in local ad hoc committees. (NCTC) (LTF)
• Maintain formal consultation with Native American Tribal Governments. (NCTC) (LTF) • Maintain formal consultation with the U.S Forest Service & Bureau of Land Management. (NCTC) (LTF)
• Monitor implementation of the Nevada County Active Transportation Plan. (NCTC) (LTF) • Participate in Critical Freight Corridors Working Group. (NCTC) (LTF) • Participate in SR 49 Stakeholders Committee. (NCTC) (LTF) • Distribute press releases. (NCTC) (LTF)
• California Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment Oversight Committee Participation. (NCTC) (LTF)
• Coordinate with partner agencies to implement the federal performance-based approach in the scope of the transportation planning process. (NCTC) (LTF) • Participate in the California Federal Programming Group (CFPG). (NCTC) (LTF) • Participate in the Transportation Cooperative Committee. (NCTC) (LTF) • Coordinate with local jurisdictions in the identification of pedestrian and bicycle projects that meet the requirements for Active Transportation Program grant funding and plan to resubmit grant applications. (NCTC) (LTF)
• Coordinate with partners to identify policies, strategies, programs, and actions that enhance the movement of people, goods, services and information on the regional, interregional, and state highway systems. (NCTC) (LTF)
• Participate in Federal Rescission working group. (NCTC) (LTF) • Participate with North Tahoe SSTAC and Placer County SSTAC in coordination of joint unmet needs hearings. (NCTC) (LTF)
• Participate with CalSTA in development and implementation of the Climate Action Plan for Transportation Infrastructure 2.0 (CAPTI). (NCTC) (LTF) • Coordinate with California State Association of Counties and Rural County Representatives of California regarding transportation policy. (NCTC) (LTF) • Participate in quarterly meetings of the Trans-Sierra Transportation Coalition. • Coordinate with Western Region Institute of Transportation Engineers on development of Induced Demand White Paper. (NCTC) (LTF)
• Participate and coordinate evacuation planning with the Nevada County Office of Emergency Services, Nevada County Sheriff’s Department, CAL FIRE NEU, California Highway Patrol, and other local emergency responders. (NCTC) (LTF)
• Outreach activities and presentations regarding Induced Demand/Vehicle Miles Traveled in rural contexts. (NCTC) (LTF)
• Participate in and monitor the development of the California Transportation Commission Active Transportation Program Cycle 8 Guidelines Development (NCTC) (RPA) • Coordinate with Caltrans District 3 and partner agencies on the implementation of the SR 49/SR 20 Feasibility Study in Grass Valley recommendations. (NCTC) (RPA) Page 54 Item # 4.
NCTC 2026/27 Overall Work Program Draft – March 2026 21 WORK ELEMENT 2 – REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING (continued) Project 2.4 – Coordination of Regional Planning (continued) • Coordinate with Caltrans District 3 and partner agencies on the implementation of the SR 49/SR 20/Uren St Project Development Team to identify safety improvements. (NCTC) (RPA) Products:
• Reports regarding participation in regional coordination activities (e.g., Critical Freight Corridors Working Group, ITSP Workshops, Sacramento to Reno Passenger Rail Service Planning Study – Truckee/Tahoe/Reno, and Critical Freight Corridors Working Group). (Bimonthly)
• Reports on coordination with the Nevada County Economic Resource Council. (Bimonthly) • Reports on SR 49 Corridor improvements. (Bimonthly)
• Reports to the Commission regarding Rural Counties Task Force and North State Super Region meetings and activities. (Bimonthly)
• Reports regarding RTPA and RCTF meetings. (Bimonthly) • Reports regarding TNT/TMA and RTTPC activities. (Bimonthly) Budget 2.4
Revenues:
LTF $12,235.29
LTF Carryover $112,919.04
STIP PPM $12,913.15
Total $138,067.47
Expenditures:
Staff $115,470.74
Indirect $21,796.74
Statewide Local Streets and Roads $800.00
Total $138,067.47
Totals may not equal addition of amounts in columns due to rounding Indirect costs are paid with local funds (see Budget Table 5).
Item # 4.
NCTC 2026/27 Overall Work Program Draft – March 2026 22 WORK ELEMENT 2 – REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING (continued) Project 2.4.2 – Airport Land Use Commission Planning and Reviews Purpose: Enhance NCTC’s regional planning efforts through the following activities:
• Coordinate local land use planning with airport land use compatibility plans. • Promote cooperation between land use planning agencies and airport land use commissions. • Conduct reviews of projects near Nevada County and Truckee Tahoe Airport for consistency with adopted ALUCPs.
• Provide staff support to Nevada County and Truckee Tahoe Airport Land Use Commissions. • Participate in statewide ALUC meetings.
Previous Work:
• Review airport land use compatibility issues.
• Conduct reviews of projects near Nevada County and Truckee Tahoe Airport for consistency with adopted ALUCPs. (ALUC Fees, LTF)
Additional/Continuing Work:
• Review airport land use compatibility issues.
• Conduct reviews of projects near Nevada County and Truckee Tahoe Airport for consistency with adopted ALUCPs. (ALUC Fees, LTF)
Products:
• Reports on airport land use compatibility issues. (Ongoing) Budget 2.4.2
Totals may not equal addition of amounts in columns due to rounding Revenues:
LTF $19,129.54
ALUC Fees $15,000.00
Total $34,129.54
Expenditures:
Staff $19,129.54
ALUC Reviews $15,000.00
Total $34,129.54
Item # 4.
NCTC 2026/27 Overall Work Program Draft – March 2026 23 WORK ELEMENT 3 – CALTRANS ACTIVITIES WITH NCTC FOR FY 2026/27
ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION PRODUCTS
System Planning Completion of system planning
products used by Caltrans and its
transportation partners
Caltrans District 3 System
Planning documents consistent
with the Caltrans District 3
System Planning Five-Year Work
Plan.
Advance Planning Completion of pre-programming
studies (e.g., Project Initiation
Documents) so as to be ready to
program resources for capital
projects
Project Initiation Documents
(PID), as indicated in the TwoYear PID Work Plan.
Regional Planning Participate in and assist with
various regional planning projects
and studies
Participation in the following
projects and studies:
• SR 49 CSMP Update
• Assisting with SR 49 TCEP, SCCP,
RAISE, Rural Surface
Transportation Program Grant
Applications
• Oversight of Planning Studies/
Conceptual Projects pertaining to the
State Highway System
Local Development Review
Program
Review of local development
proposals potentially impacting
the State Highway System
Assistance to lead agencies to
ensure the identification and
mitigation of local development
impacts to the State Highway
System that is consistent with the
State’s smart mobility goals.
Item # 4.
Glossary of Terms and Acronyms
Active Transportation Plan: Identifies a network of pedestrian and bicycle facilities and projects to support pedestrian and bicycle safety for people of all ages and abilities. Specifically, the Active Transportation Plan aims to:
• Identify barriers and innovative solutions to encourage walking and bicycling as viable travel modes • Effectively build on recently completed and current active transportation planning efforts • Develop walking/bicycling networks supportive of existing and future land uses and projects • Develop a clearly defined implementation strategy with specific, creative, yet practical and financially feasible projects matched to specific funding opportunities Active Transportation Program (ATP): Created in 2013 by the passage of SB 99 and AB 101, the Active Transportation Program consolidates existing federal and state transportation programs into a single program with a focus to make California a national leader in active transportation. The purpose of the Active Transportation Program is to encourage increased use of active modes of transportation by achieving the following goals:
• Increase the proportion of trips accomplished by biking and walking, • Increase safety and mobility for non-motorized users, • Advance the active transportation efforts of regional agencies to achieve Greenhouse Gas (GHG) reduction goals, pursuant to SB 375 (of 2008) and SB 341 (of 2009), • Enhance public health and ensure that disadvantaged communities fully share in the benefits of the program, and
• Provide a broad spectrum of projects to benefit many types of active transportation users.
Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC): The fundamental purpose of ALUCs is to promote land use compatibility around airports. As expressed in state statutes, this purpose is “… to protect public health, safety, and welfare by ensuring the orderly expansion of airports and the adoption of land use measures that minimize the public’s exposure to excessive noise and safety hazards within areas around public airports to the extent that these areas are not already devoted to incompatible uses.” The statutes give ALUCs two principal powers by which to accomplish this objective:
1. ALUCs must prepare and adopt an airport land use plan; and
2. ALUCs must review the plans, regulations, and other actions of local agencies and airport operators for consistency with that plan.
Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP): A document referred to by ALUCs and individuals seeking to review standards for land use planning in the vicinity of an airport. The ALUCP defines compatible land uses for noise, safety, airspace protection, and overflight within the Airport Influence Area (AIA).
Allocation: A distribution of funds by formula or agreement. With regard to Transportation Development Act funds, allocation is the discretionary action by the RTPA which designates funds for a specific claimant for a specific purpose.
Apportionment: Distribution of funds by a formula. Apportionment under the Transportation Development Act is the determination by the RTPA of each area’s share of anticipated LTF for the ensuing fiscal year.
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): A statute that requires state and local agencies to identify the significant environmental impacts of their actions and to avoid or mitigate those impacts, if feasible.
Capital Improvement Program (CIP) or Capital Improvement Plan: A short-range plan, which identifies capital projects and equipment purchases, provides a planning schedule and identifies options, for financing the plan.
Item # 4.
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ): A federal funding program that is available in western Nevada County for transportation projects that demonstrate emission reductions to help attain federal air quality standards. Western Nevada County was classified in 2004 as “non-attainment” for 8- hour ozone standards. Project categories eligible for CMAQ funding include:
• Alternative fuels and vehicles
• Congestion reduction and traffic flow improvements
• Transit improvements
• Bicycle and pedestrian facilities
• Public education and outreach
• Diesel engine retrofits
• Carpooling and vanpooling
Projects are submitted by local jurisdictions for consideration and are ranked based on air quality benefits and project readiness. NCTC then reviews the ranking and chooses projects to be funded.
Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP): Foundational documents supporting a partnership-based, integrated management of all travel modes (cars, trucks, transit, bicycles, and pedestrians) and infrastructure (highways, roads, rail tracks, information systems and bike routes) so that mobility along a corridor is provided in the most efficient and effective manner possible.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA): An agency within the U.S. Department of Transportation that supports state and local governments in the design, construction, and maintenance of the Nation's highway system (Federal Aid Highway Program) and various federally and tribal owned lands (Federal Lands).
Federal Transit Administration (FTA): A federal agency that provides financial and technical assistance to local public transit systems, including buses, subways, light rail, commuter rail, trolleys and ferries.
Findings of Apportionment: Prior to March 1 of each year, Nevada County Transportation Commission (NCTC), pursuant to the California Code of Regulations Section 6644, transmits “Findings of Apportionment” for all prospective claimants. The apportionments are determined from the Nevada County Auditor-Controller's estimate of Local Transportation Funding (LTF) for the ensuing fiscal year, less those funds allocated for Transportation Development Act (TDA) administration, transportation planning and programming, pedestrian/ bicycle projects, and community transit services. The remaining funds are then apportioned according to the population of each applicant's jurisdiction in relation to the total population of the County.
Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act: A federal law enacted in 2015 to provide longterm funding for surface transportation infrastructure planning and investment. The FAST Act authorizes $305 billion over fiscal years 2016 through 2020 for highway, highway and motor vehicle safety, public transportation, motor carrier safety, hazardous materials safety, rail, and research, technology, and statistics programs.
FTA Section 5310: This program set forth in United States Code (U.S.C.) Title 49 Section 5310 provides formula funding to statesfor the purpose of assisting private nonprofit groupsin meeting the transportation needs of older adults and people with disabilities when the transportation service provided is unavailable, insufficient, or inappropriate to meeting these needs.
FTA Section 5311: This program set forth in United States Code (U.S.C.) Title 49 Section 5311 provides grants for Rural Areas providing capital, planning, and operating assistance to states to support public transportation in rural areas with populations of less than 50,000 where many residents often rely on public transit to reach their destinations.
Interregional Transportation Improvement Program (ITIP): The ITIP is a five-year program of projects funded through the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) that obtains funding primarily through the per-gallon State tax on gasoline. The ITIP is prepared by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and is submitted to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) for approval. Page 59
Item # 4.
Level of Service (LOS): A qualitative measure used to relate the quality of traffic service. LOS is used to analyze highways by categorizing traffic flow and assigning quality levels of traffic based on performance measures like speed, density, etc. North American highway LOS standards use letters A through F, with A being the best and F being the worst, similar to academic grading.
Local Transportation Fund (LTF): Pursuant to California Public Utilities Code (PUC) 99401.5 and PUC 99401.6, LTF funding is derived from a 1/4-cent general sales tax collected statewide. The State Board of Equalization, based on the sales tax collected in each county, returns the sales tax revenues to each county’s LTF. The LTF was created in 1971when legislation was passed to provide funding to counties for transit and non-transit related purposes.
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU): An agreement between two (or more) parties. It expresses a convergence of will between the parties, indicating an intended common line of action. Many government agencies use MOUs to define a relationship between agencies.
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO): MPOs are the regional planning entities in urbanized areas, usually an area with a population of 50,000 or more. There are 18 MPOs in California, accounting for approximately 98% of the state’s population.
Nevada County Airport Land Use Commission (NCALUC): The Nevada County Transportation Commission was designated by the Nevada County Board of Supervisors and the city selection committee as the ALUC for the Nevada County Airport in May 2010. The NCTC Executive Director serves as the NCALUC Executive Director with support from the NCTC staff.
Nevada County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (NCALUCP): The basic function of this plan is to promote compatibility between the airport and surrounding land uses. The plan serves as a tool for use by the NCALUC in fulfilling its duty to review airport and adjacent land use development proposals.
Additionally, the plan sets compatibility criteria applicable to local agencies and their preparation or amendment of land use plans and ordinances and to landowners in their design of new developments.
North State Super Region (NSSR): Regional transportation planning agencies from 16 counties in Northern California came together on October 20, 2010, to sign a memorandum of agreement. This agreement created an alliance between the agencies to work together and support each other on issues related to transportation and to have a unified voice representing the North State.
Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District (NSAQMD): The Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District was formed in 1986 by the merging of the Air Pollution Control Districts of Nevada, Plumas and Sierra Counties. The District is required by state law to achieve and maintain the federal and state Ambient Air Quality Standards, which are air quality standards set at levels that will protect public health. The District is composed of three primary entities, each with a specific purpose: District staff, Governing Board of Directors, and Hearing Board.
Overall Work Program (OWP): NCTC annually adopts a budget through the preparation of an Overall Work Program. This work program describes the planning projects and activities or work elements that are to be funded, and the type of funds that will pay for the expenditures.
Planning, Programming, and Monitoring (PPM): PPM is funding allocated by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) through the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP).
Designated uses of PPM include:
• Regional transportation planning – includes development and preparation of the regional transportation plan;
• Project planning – includes the development of project study reports or major investment studies conducted by regional agencies or by local agencies, in cooperation with regional agencies;
• Program development – includes the preparation of regional transportation improvement programs (RTIPs) and studies supporting them; and
• Monitoring the implementation of STIP projects – includes project delivery, timely use of funds, and compliance with state law and CTC guidelines.
Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E): In this stage of project development, the scope of the selected alternative is refined; design surveys and photogrammetric mapping is obtained; and reports including traffic data, hydrology and hydraulics, geotechnical design, pavement design, and materials and sound wall design reports are completed. Final right-of-way requirements are determined, and Page 60 Item # 4.
procurement is initiated. At the completion of the PS&E stage, a complete set of project plans have been developed that will allow a competent contractor to bid and build the project. These plans include a refined estimate of the construction costs and any required specifications on how the work is to proceed.
Project Approval and Environmental Documentation (PA/ED): The PA/ED step of project development reinforces the philosophy of balancing transportation needs with community goals and values. Outputs of the PA/ED step are the project report and environmental document. The project report is an engineering document that evaluates the various alternatives for selection of a preferred alternative.
The environmental document is a disclosure document that assesses the potential impacts of the project on the environment.
Project Initiation Document (PID): a report that documents the purpose, need, scope, cost, and schedule for a transportation project. The PID identifies and describes the viable alternatives to a transportation problem.
Project Study Report (PSR): A report of preliminary engineering efforts, including a detailed alternatives analysis, cost, schedule, and scope information for a transportation project. A PSR also includes estimated schedule and costs for environmental mitigation and permit compliance.
Public Transportation Modernization Improvement & Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA): PTMISEA was created by Proposition 1B, the Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006. Of the $19.925 billion available to Transportation, $3.6 billion dollars was allocated to PTMISEA to be available to transit operators over a ten-year period.
PTMISEA funds may be used for transit rehabilitation, safety or modernization improvements, capital service enhancements or expansions, new capital projects, bus rapid transit improvements, or rolling stock (buses and rail cars) procurement, rehabilitation or replacement. Funds in this account are appropriated annually by the Legislature to the State Controller’s Office (SCO) for allocation in accordance with Public Utilities Code formula distributions: 50% allocated to Local Operators based on fare-box revenue and 50% to Regional Entities based on population.
Regional Improvement Program (RIP): The RIP is one of two funding programs in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The RIP receives 75% of the STIP funds and the second program, the Interregional Improvement Program receives 25% of STIP funds. RIP funds are allocated every two years by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) to projects submitted by Regional Transportation Planning Agencies (RTPAs) in their Regional Transportation Improvement Programs (RTIPs).
Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP): The RSTP was established by the State of California to utilize federal Surface Transportation Program funds for a wide variety of transportation projects. The State exchanges these federal funds for less restrictive state funds to maximize the ability of local agencies to use the funds for transportation purposes including planning, construction of improvements, maintenance and operation of public streets, and pedestrian and bicycle projects.
Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP): NCTC submits regional transportation projects to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) for funding in a list called the RTIP. The RTIP is a five-year program that is updated every two years. Projects in the RTIP are funded from the Regional Improvement Program (RIP).
Regional Transportation Mitigation Fee (RTMF): The Western Nevada County Regional Transportation Mitigation Fee Program was established in 2001 through a partnership of Nevada County, City of Nevada City, City of Grass Valley, and the Nevada County Transportation Commission (NCTC).
The RTMF Program was developed to collect impact fees from new development to help fund transportation improvement projects needed to accommodate growth in the region of western Nevada County.
Regional Transportation Plan (RTP): The Regional Transportation Plan has been developed to document transportation policy, actions, and funding recommendations that will meet the short- and longterm access and mobility needs of Nevada County residents over the next 20 years. This document is designed to guide the systematic development of a comprehensive multi-modal transportation system for Nevada County.
Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA): County or multi-county entities charged by state law in meeting certain transportation planning requirements. As the RTPA for Nevada County, NCTC
Item # 4.
coordinates transportation planning for Grass Valley, Nevada City, Nevada County, and the Town of Truckee.
Request for Proposal (RFP): A document that solicits proposals, often made through a bidding process, by an agency or company interested in procurement of a commodity, service, or valuable asset, to potential suppliers to submit business proposals.
Rural Counties Task Force (RCTF): There are 26 rural county Regional Transportation Planning Agencies (RTPAs) or Local Transportation Commissions represented on the Rural Counties Task Force (RCTF). The RCTF is an informal organization with no budget or staff that generally meets every other month. A member of
the CTC, usually acts as liaison to the RCTF, and CTC and Caltrans staff typically attend these meetings to explain and discuss changing statewide transportation issues that may be of concern to the rural counties.
Rural Planning Assistance (RPA): Annually the 26 rural RTPAs receive state transportation planning funding, known as RPA, on a reimbursement basis, after costs are incurred and paid for using local funds.
Social Services Transportation Advisory Council (SSTAC): Pursuant to California Public Utilities Code 99238 the SSTAC consists of representatives of potential transit users including the general public, seniors and/or disabled; social service providers for seniors, disabled, and persons of limited means; local consolidated transportation service agencies; and Truckee residents who represent the senior and Hispanic communities. The SSTAC meets at least once annually and has the following responsibilities:
• To maintain and improve transportation services to the residents of Nevada County, particularly the elderly and disabled.
• Review and recommend action to the NCTC relative to the identification of unmet transit needs and advise the Commission on transit issues, including coordination and consolidation of specialized transportation services.
• Provide a forum for members to share information and concerns about existing elderly and handicapped transportation resources.
State Highway Operations and Protection Program (SHOPP): The SHOPP is a four-year listing of projects prepared by Caltrans.
State Transit Assistance (STA): These funds are provided by the State for the development and support of public transportation needs. They are allocated by the State Controller’s Office to each county based on population and transit performance.
State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP): The STIP is a multi-year capital improvement program of transportation projects on and off the State Highway System, funded with revenues from the Transportation Investment Fund and other funding sources. STIP programming generally occurs every two years. The STIP has two funding programs, the Regional Improvement Program and the Interregional Improvement Program.
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC): The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) is made up of representatives of local public works and planning departments, Caltrans District 3, public airport operators, the air pollution control district, public transit operators, and the NCTC consultant engineer on retainer. Members are assigned by staff of local jurisdictions and other participating organizations. Any decisions made or actions proposed by the TAC shall be subject to the review and approval of the NCTC.
TAC responsibilitiesinclude:
• Provide technical input, assistance, and recommendations to the Commission to ensure there is comprehensive coordination and cooperation in the transportation planning process for Nevada County.
• Review and comment on comprehensive regional transportation plans for the area, which include the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP), and the Overall Work Program (OWP).
• Coordinate efforts and discussions to create and maintain circulation elements of the General Plan and specific plans of the member governments. Page 62 Item # 4.
Transit Development Plan (TDP): Transit Development Plans study the County’s transit services. They help identify transit service needs, prioritize improvements and determine the resources required for implementing modified or new service. The plans also provide a foundation for requests for State and federal funding,
Transit Services Commission (TSC): This commission oversees and advises as necessary the daily operations of the western Nevada County transit system. The TSC has the following responsibilities:
• Establish fares;
• Adopt the level of transit and paratransit services, including route structure and service areas; • Monitor public response;
• Approve proposed purchase of additional vehicles;
• Review and approve the annual budget for transit and paratransit operations.
Transportation Development Act (TDA): The Transportation Development Act was enacted in 1971 and provides two major sources of funding for public transportation: the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and the State Transit Assistance fund (STA). The TDA funds a wide variety of transportation programs, including planning and programming activities, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, community transit services, and public transportation projects. One of NCTC’s major responsibilities is the administration of TDA funding in Nevada County.
Travel Demand Model (also Traffic Model): A computer model used to estimate travel behavior and travel demand for a specific future time frame, based on a number of assumptions. In general, travel analysis is performed to assist decision makers in making informed transportation planning decisions.
The strength of modern travel demand forecasting is the ability to ask critical “what if” questions about proposed plans and policies.
Truckee North Tahoe Transportation Management Association (TNT/TMA): The Truckee North Tahoe Transportation Management Association is dedicated to fostering public-private partnerships and resources for the advocacy and promotion of innovative solutions to the unique transportation challenges of the Truckee-North Lake Tahoe Resort Triangle. The TNT/TMA is a planning stakeholder and partner with NCTC.
Truckee Tahoe Airport Land Use Commission (TTALUC): The Truckee Tahoe Airport is an "intercounty" airport situated in both Nevada County and Placer County; therefore, a special ALUC with representatives from both counties was formed. Six members are selected, one each, by Placer and Nevada Counties' Board of Supervisors,City SelectionCommittees, and Airport Managers of each county.
A seventh member is chosen by the other six members to represent the general public. NCTC authorized its staff on May 19, 2010, to provide staff support to the TTALUC.
Truckee Tahoe Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (TTALUCP): A document referred to by the TTALUC and individuals seeking to review standards for land use planning in the vicinity of the Truckee Tahoe Airport. The plan defines compatible land uses for noise, safety, airspace protection, and overflight.
The TTALUC performs consistency determinations for proposed projects in the area covered by the Compatibility Plan as needed.
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT): VMT is a metric of the total milestraveled by vehicles in a defined area over a defined period of time and is often used to estimate the environmental impacts of driving, such as Greenhouse Gases and air pollutant emissions. Factors that influence VMT include travel mode, number of trips, and distance traveled. California jurisdictions are transitioning from a Level of Service (LOS) metric to a Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) metric within the California Environmental Quality Act’s (CEQA) transportation analysis.
Item # 4.
RESOLUTION NO. R2026-10
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRASS VALLEY
APPROVING THE PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR INCLUSION IN THE NEVADA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION’S FY 2026/27 OVERALL WORK PROGRAM WHEREAS, on October 8, 1991, the Council did adopt Resolution No. 91-172, which authorized the Mayor to execute a Memorandum of Understanding on behalf of the City of Grass Valley with the Nevada County Transportation Commission relating to regional transportation planning; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the above referenced Memorandum of Understanding, the Nevada County Transportation Commission has submitted the projects to be included in its FY 2026/27 Overall Work Program for the review and approval of the City Council of the City of Grass Valley.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRASS VALLEY:
1. That the City Council hereby acknowledges its approval of the projects proposed for inclusion in the FY 2026/27 Overall Work Program of the Nevada County Transportation Commission as submitted; and
2. That the City Council encourages the Nevada County Transportation Commission to continue its efforts to coordinate the regional transportation planning process and to work closely with the staff of the City of Grass Valley to identify and resolve issues that are of common concern.
3. That the City Council encourages the Nevada County Transportation Commission to prioritize efforts to analyze the current fixed route transit delivery model and examine alternative delivery options, such as microtransit, micro-mobility, and dial-a-ride to determine the most cost-effective way to provide enhanced transit services.
4. That the City Council encourages the Nevada County Transportation Commission to allocate available Regional Transportation Mitigation Fee (RTMF) program funding, identify potential supplemental funding sources and assist in project delivery of the proposed, RTMF listed roundabout project at the intersection of McCourtney Rd and the State Route 20 Eastbound ramps.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Grass Valley at a regular meeting held the 28 th day of April, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
_______________________________
Hillary Hodge, MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
__________________________________ _______________________________ Michael G. Colantuono, CITY ATTORNEY Taylor Whittingslow, CITY CLERK
Item # 4.
Item # 4.
City of Grass Valley
City Council
Agenda Action Sheet
Title: AB 481 – Military Equipment Annual Inventory and Report; renewal of ordinance #815
CEQA: Not a Project
Recommendation: (1) Renew previously adopted ordinance #815 pursuant to requirements of AB-481; (2) Approve the attached Annual Military Equipment Report and Annual Inventory Report- “Addendum A” and “Addendum B” respectively; (3) Approve the expenditure of $1824.32 to replenish equipment stock; (4) deem three UAV devices as “surplus personal property”; (5) direct the department head, with approval of the City Manager, to dispose of surplus personal property in accordance with 3.08.220 B,3,c of the municipal code.
Prepared by: Lt. Brian Blakemore, GVPD
Council Meeting Date: 04/28/2026 Date Prepared: 04/15/2026 Agenda: Consent
Background Information: On 04/26/2022, the City Council heard and adopted its first reading of Ordinance #815 related to the police military equipment use policy (attached), pursuant to the requirements of AB-481, in accordance with Government Code 7070 et al.
This was done to ensure the City of Grass Valley and its police department were in compliance with the new legislative changes. Now that we are multiple years into the policy, part of maintaining compliance is an annual report to City Council, updating the military equipment inventory and policy as necessary, making the information public, and holding a meeting to discuss the policy and equipment with members of the public. The goal of this report and action of the Council is to ensure full compliance and transparency with the legislative requirements.
Analysis / Discussion:
There have been no legislative changes to Government Code 7070, GVPD Policy 706, and/or City of Grass Valley Ordinance 815 since their adoption.
Government Code Section 7070 (c) defines “Military equipment”. The attached Annual Inventory Report identifies equipment utilized by GVPD that matches those definitions. It also indicates the quantity of any equipment utilized during calendar year 2025, pursuant to the requirement of 7072(a). Additional information is included in the written report (attached).
The governing body shall only approve a military equipment use policy pursuant to this chapter if it determines all of the following:
Item # 5.
(A) The military equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety. (B) The proposed military equipment use policy will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties.
(C) If purchasing the equipment, the equipment is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety. (D) Prior military equipment use complied with the military equipment use policy that was in effect at the time, or if prior uses did not comply with the accompanying military equipment use policy, corrective action has been taken to remedy nonconforming uses and ensure future compliance.
Staff has reviewed these safeguards and finds that all of them have been met to the best of the police department’s knowledge, training, and experience.
The governing body (City Council) shall review any ordinance that it has adopted pursuant to this section approving the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment at least annually and, vote on whether to renew the ordinance at a regular meeting. The governing body shall determine, based on the annual military equipment report submitted pursuant to Section 7072, whether each type of military equipment identified in that report has complied with the standards for approval set forth above. If the governing body determines that a type of military equipment identified in that annual military equipment report has not complied with the standards for approval, the governing body shall either disapprove a renewal of the authorization for that type of military equipment or require modifications to the military equipment use policy in a manner that will resolve the lack of compliance.
The police department believes that the military equipment used by, and in possession of, the police department, as well as the previously adopted policy and ordinance, complies with the standards of the law.
The police department will hold a public meeting no more than 30 days from the approval of this item, where the general public may discuss and ask questions regarding the annual military equipment report and the law enforcement agency’s funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment (Government Code 7072(b)). We will also post our annual report and associated documents to the police department webpage (Government Code 7072(a)).
New Actions & Reporting Year Purchases:
Military Equipment Section 1-
“Addendum A” (attached) is a true and accurate description of the equipment the police department maintains in this section. In the adopted FY25/26 budget, City Council approved the replacement of Unmanned Arial Vehicles (UAV), commonly referred to as drones, which had reached end-of-operational-life status. Police department staff identified optimal replacement equipment. At the Regular City Council Meeting on December 9th 2025, Council approved an action to purchase said equipment. A purchase order was placed as indicated on the Annual Inventory Report (attached). GVPD has yet to receive the replacement equipment or invoicing due to supply/lead time issues. Should this extend into FY 26/27 the budgeted funds will be rolled into the next budget and allocated for this purpose - No Additional Funding Required
Item # 5.
Military Equipment Section 10, 12, & 14-
“Addendum A” (attached) is a true and accurate description of the equipment the police department maintains in these sections. The Council has approved the police department to maintain a modest stock of equipment in these categories since adoption of Ordinance #815.
It is critical to note that this equipment is all designed as non-lethal/less-than-lethal equipment. Maintaining available stock provides the police department with an abundance of options to meet critical needs and aid in avoiding deadly force and provides police personnel with de-escalation options.
Throughout 2025, Police Officers have utilized expired/expiring equipment for training purposes, to maintain use-competence, and confirm accuracy. Other equipment has expired in the last year and has been transitioned to strict training-stock-only. This equipment is no longer deployable and must be replenished.
Sections 12.6 and 14.6 of “Addendum A” describes sought purchases. A total purchase amount of $1824.32 will bring the police department to full operational capability. No additional funding is requested. The expense, $1824.32, will be absorbed by existing police budget funds.
Surplus Equipment:
As referenced above and detailed at the regular City Council Meeting on December 9th 2025, the Police Department has three drones which no longer serve operational needs and are no longer deployable due to outdated software and hardware. The replacement of which would cost thousands of dollars and exceed the second-hand private party market value based on informal conversations with UAV dealers.
The undeployable equipment is described as:
(1) DJI Matrice 210, original purchase price $21,550.00, purchased in December 2018 (2) DJI Spark, original purchase price $411.00, purchased in December 2018 (3) Skydio SDRC2V1, Original purchase price $2,680.18, purchased in February 2020 No longer meeting an operational need these three drones hold a current value of less than $100 dollars, per item, and are “surplus personal property” of the City of Grass Valley.
According to Grass Valley Municipal Code 3.80.220 "Surplus Personal Property" shall mean any personal property or equipment owned by the City of Grass Valley which a department head determines, subject to approval of the city manager or the city council, is no longer needed or used for city purposes or which has become obsolete, worn out or past its useful life.
As a new action, the police department is moving to have City Council deem this equipment to be surplus personal property. The police department also moves for council direction to dispose of this property in accordance to 3.80.220 B.3.c. which states, “surplus property with less than one hundred dollars value may be disposed of by the department head, upon written approval of the city manager, in the manner most advantageous to the city considering the value of the property and the cost of sale, including, but not limited to, sale by salvage, recycling or disposal”.
Item # 5.
Council Goals/Objectives: The execution of this action attempts to achieve Strategic Goal #6 – Exceptional Public Safety
Fiscal Impact: This action has a fiscal impact of $1,824.32 which will be absorbed by the originally adopted police budget
Funds Available: Yes Account #: 100-201
Reviewed by: Alex Gammelgard, Interim City Manager
Attachments:
Addendum A- Annual Military Equipment Report (typed/written document) Addendum B- Annual Inventory Report (Spreadsheet)
Ordinance #815
Grass Valley Police Department Policy 706
Item # 5.
1 | P a g e
ADDENDUM A
GRASS VALLEY
POLICE DEPARTMENT
129 S. Auburn Street ⦁ Grass Valley, CA 95945
(530) 477-4600 main ⦁ (530) 274-4329 fax
To: City of Grass Valley City Council
From: Alexander K. Gammelgard, Chief of Police
Subject: Annual Military Equipment Report
This report is prepared in accordance with department policy, and associated legislative requirements and is provided to the Grass Valley City Council and members of the public regarding the possession and use of certain equipment in the possession of the Grass Valley Police Department.
__________________________________________________________________________ Government Code Section 7070 (c) - subsections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, and 15: There are no updates or impacts, as no new equipment as defined in the above referenced sections, in the police department’s possession or was purchased in calendar year 2025, and there is no intention to make any purchases of this type of military equipment during this calendar year (2026).
__________________________________________________________________________ Government Code Section 7070 (c) – subsections 1, 10, 12, and 14: Below are items of military equipment as defined in Government Code Section 7070 (c) which have been in the possession of the police department since January of 2022, the use of which was approved pursuant to Ordinance #815, first considered and adopted by the City Council on April 26, 2022 (see attached, Addendum C).
Pursuant to 7072 (a), this report will outline, for each type of equipment, the following:
(1) A summary of how the military equipment was used and the purpose of its use. [Inventory Adjustment]
(2) A summary of any complaints or concerns received concerning the military equipment.
(3) The results of any internal audits, any information about violations of the military equipment use policy, and any actions taken in response.
Item # 5.
2 | P a g e
(4) The total annual cost for each type of military equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs, and from what source funds will be provided for the military equipment in the calendar year following submission of the annual military equipment report.
(5) The quantity possessed for each type of military equipment. (6) If the law enforcement agency intends to acquire additional military equipment in the next year, the quantity sought for each type of military equipment.
(INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
Item # 5.
3 | P a g e
Section 1, Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles:
The Grass Valley Police Department utilizes Unmanned Aireal Vehicles, “UAV’s” commonly known as “drones,” to aid in a multitude of circumstances; IE: criminal investigations, traffic investigations, public relations, and partnerships with interdepartmental groups or other first responder entities.
1.1 Use/Inventory Adjustment1.1.1 The DJI Mavic Enterprise was utilized eighteen (18) times for incidents such as crime scene investigation, suspect apprehension, code enforcement, search and rescue assistance, City engineering, fire suppression and detection activities.
Three UAV (drones) were not utilized in 2025 and are past their useful life as documented in this council action sheet, as well as the associated Council item taken on December 9, 2025. These articles are:
(1) DJI Matrice 210 UAV
(1) DJI Spark
The Skydio SDRC2V1
The police department has ordered and is currently awaiting delivery of replacement equipment. This replacement equipment was authorized by Council action on December 9, 2025. The replacement equipment is identified as:
1 Skydio X10 Replacement for DJI Matrice 210 – General purpose UAV with optical and infrared camera capabilities
2 Skydio R10 Replacement/enhancement to DJI Spark and Mavic Platforms respectively.
1.2- Complaints:
No complaints were reported.
1.3- Internal Audit:
An audit of use in conjunction with training was conducted. No violations of policy were identified. A use log is completed for every deployment.
1.4- Total Annual Costs (including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing expenses): $0 as of reporting date.
Invoices coming at time of unit delivery of replacement equipment in 1.1.
1.5- The quantity possessed for each type of military equipmentRefer to Attachment - 2026 Annual Inventory Report
1.6 Request to increase stockNO.
Item # 5.
4 | P a g e
Section 10, Specialized firearms and ammunition less than .50 caliber:
The police department maintain stock of various items in this category- including lessthan-lethal” beanbag rounds, rubber-shot rounds, and breaching rounds (designed for destruction of door hinges and handle sets).
10.1- Use/Inventory Adjustments:
10.1.1- 12GA Drag Stabilized Bean Bag Rounds (Model 3027) Historically, Council has authorized a stock of 300 “less-than-lethal” bean bag rounds, which expire on a five-year cycle according to the manufacturer. This year 76 rounds were expended in training and an additional 80 expired rounds were removed from inventory. The police department replaced a percentage and maintains a stock of 199 deployable rounds and is not seeking to expand to approved inventory cap.
10.1.2- 12GA CTS CS Liquid Barricade Ferret Rounds (model 2330). Ferret rounds are specialized, non-burning barricade-penetrating projectiles designed to deliver chemical agents (CS or OC powder/liquid) into structures or vehicles.
Historically, Council has authorized a stock of twenty-eight (28) rounds, which expire on a five-year cycle according to the manufacturer.
This year 10 rounds expired. 2 rounds were deployed for training, 8 are slated for training use. The police department is refraining from purchasing replacement rounds, instead electing to maintain a stock of 18 deployable since there have been no field application requirements in recent years.
The additional equipment identified in Section 10, was not used or adjusted in 2025.
10.2- Complaints:
No complaints were reported.
10.3- Internal Audit:
An audit of use in conjunction with training was conducted. No violations of policy were identified. A use log is completed for every deployment.
10.4- Total Annual Costs (including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing expenses): $588.00
10.4.1 Acquisition- $588.00
Expense for eighty (80) 12GA Drag Stabilized bean bag rounds to replace those used for training.
10.5- The quantity possessed for each type of military equipmentRefer to Attachment - 2026 Annual Inventory Report
10.6 Request to increase stockNO. Stock decreased.
Item # 5.
5 | P a g e
Section 12, ‘Flashbang’ grenades and explosive breaching tools, ‘tear gas,’ and ‘pepper balls’:
The police department maintains a stock of diversionary/distraction devices intended as non-lethal sensory disruptions designed to overwhelm or distract non-compliant or barricaded criminal suspects.
12.1- Use/Inventory Adjustment:
12.1.1- CTS Mini Flash-Bang (Model 7290M)
Twelve 12 units were used in training to maintain use-competence. All were replaced, bringing stock up to historically approved amount; twenty-four (24).
12.1.2- 40mm CTS Liquid CS (Model 4330) Ferret
Two (2) units CTS 40mm Ferret rounds were used in training. See 12.6 for replacement information
12.1.3- 40mm CTS White Smoke Multi-Projectile
Four (4) units were used in training. Based on thoughtful examination, police department staff do not feel maintaining stock of these items is required to achieve operational objectives and will not be seeking to replace them.
12.2- Complaints:
No complaints were reported.
12.3- Internal Audit:
No violations of policy were identified. A use log is completed for every deployment.
12.4- Total Annual Costs (including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing expenses): $1098.41
12.4.1Acquisition: $1098.41 spent on twelve (12) CTS Mini-Bang flashbangs to replace expired stock and those used for training.
12.5- The quantity possessed for each type of military equipment:
Refer to Attachment - 2026 Annual Inventory Report
12.6- Request to increase stock:
Yes- The police department is requesting to increase approved stock from eight (8) CTS ferret rounds to twelve (12) to accommodate upcoming instructor certification training during which four will be deployed for training. This additional stock results in an expenditure of $148.52+ applicable taxes.
Item # 5.
6 | P a g e
Section 14, 40mm projectile launchers, ‘bean bag,’ rubber bullets, and specialty impact munition (SIM) weapons:
The police department maintains a stock of 40mm less-than-lethal impact munitions, and associated launch devices, for use in gaining voluntary compliance from hostile subjects posing an imminent threat, or possessing extended-reach resistance capabilities.
14.1- Use/Inventory Adjustment:
14.1.1 40mm DT eXact iMpact Sponge Rounds
Three (3) units were used in training to maintain use-competence and to confirm launcher accuracy.
14.1.2 40mm DT Bean Bag Rounds
Two (2) Defensive Technology 40mm Bean Bag round used in training to maintain use-competence.
14.2- Complaints:
No complaints were reported.
14.3- Internal Audit:
No violations of policy were identified. A use log is completed for every deployment.
14.4- Total Annual Cost (including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing expenses):
$0
14.5- The quantity possessed for each type of military equipment:
Refer to Attachment - 2026 Annual Inventory Report
14.6- Request to increase stock:
Yes. As of 12/2025 article specified in 14.1.1 and 14.1.2 which remain in stock are expired and have been transitioned to use for training purposes only. The police department seeks approval to bring deployable stock back to historically approved levels; 40ea and 12ea respectively. The cost of purchase will be $1675.80+ applicable taxes.
(END OF REPORT)
Item # 5.
Addendum B
Section Description Status
1 Unmanned Aerial / Ground Vehicles (Drones) Active
2 MRAP Vehicles or Armored Personnel Carriers Not Utilized 3 High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicles Not Utilized 4 Tracked Armored Vehicles Not Utilized
5 Command and Control Vehicles Not Utilized
6 Weaponized Aircraft, Vessels, or Vehicles Not Utilized 7 Battering Rams & Breaching Apparatuses Not Utilized
8 Firearms ≥ .50 Caliber Not Utilized
9 Ammunition ≥ .50 Caliber Not Utilized
10 Specialized Firearms & Ammo < .50 Cal Active
11 Firearm Accessories for Launching Explosives Not Utilized 12 Flashbangs, Tear Gas, Pepper Balls Active
13 LRAD, Water Cannons, Microwave Weapons Not Utilized
14 40mm Launchers & Specialty Impact Munitions Active
15 Other Equipment Needing Oversight Not Utilized
TOTALS
GRASS VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT
2025 Annual Inventory Report — AB 481 Military Equipment Report Date: February 24, 2026
Item # 5.
Item / Equipment Status Approved Qty Notes / Model Purchase Price (ea.) Lifespan Purchase Year DJI Mavic II Enterprise Pro Active 1 UAS (Drone) $7,851.00 5 Years FY 19/20 SKYDIO X10 Approved — Pending Arrival 7/2026 1 UAS (Drone) $22,026.50 5 Years FY 25/26 SKYDIO R10 (2 drone package) Approved — Pending Arrival 7/2026 1 UAS (Drone) $17,420.00 5 Years FY 25/26 Part 107 License Active 5 Recurring — 2-year renewal cycle; 2 renewals due 2026 variable 2 Years Recurring Section 1: Unmanned, Remotely Piloted, Powered Aerial or Ground Vehicles Report Date: February 24, 2026 | Grass Valley Police Department
Item # 5.
— Not Utilized —
Section 2: MRAP Vehicles or Armored Personnel Carriers
Item # 5.
— Not Utilized —
Section 3: High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicles (HMMWV)
Item # 5.
— Not Utilized —
Section 4: Tracked Armored Vehicles
Item # 5.
— Not Utilized —
Section 5: Command and Control Vehicles
Item # 5.
— Not Utilized —
Section 6: Weaponized Aircraft, Vessels, or Vehicles of Any Kind
Item # 5.
— Not Utilized —
Section 7: Battering Rams, Slugs, and Breaching Apparatuses
Item # 5.
— Not Utilized —
Section 8: Firearms ≥ .50 Caliber (Not Including Shotguns)
Item # 5.
— Not Utilized —
Section 9: Ammunition ≥ .50 Caliber (Not Including Shotgun Ammunition)
Item # 5.
Item / Equipment Status
Approved Inventoy
(start of year if
different)
Qty Deployed
(Training)
Qty Deployed
(Field)
Qty Purchased to
Maintain approved
stock
End-of-Year
Deployable
Inventory
Notes / Model Lifespan Unit Cost ($) Total Cost in
2025 ($)
12GA Less Lethal Shotgun w/ LL Stock Active 1 n/a n/a 0 1 Patrol — Orange stock with sling N/A 593 $ - 12GA Drag Stabilized Bean Bag Rounds (Model 3027) Active 300 (276 at year start) 76 0 80 199
76 expended in training. Additional 80 rds. expried in
2025 - removed from inventory.Total Adjusted
Amount= 156 rds. 80 new rounds purchased to
replace.
5 Years 7.35 $ 588.00
12GA Rubber Buck Shot Active 125 0 0 0 125 15-shot load / charges 5 Years 23.99 $ - 12GA CTS CS Liquid Barricade (model 2330) Active 28 2 0 0 18 10 rds expired in 2025 - removed from deployable
inventory. 2 expended in trianing, addiitonal 8
slated for trianing use. Maintaining deployable stock
below approved threshold.
5 Years 8 $ -
12GA Breaching Round (Frangible Slug) Active 200 0 0 0 200 Hornady TAP Entry — price per 100 rds 5 Years 202.03 $ - TOTAL ACQUISITION VALUE $ 588.00
Section 10: Specialized Firearms and Ammunition Less Than .50 Caliber Report Date: February 24, 2026 | Grass Valley Police Department
Item # 5.
— Not Utilized —
Section 11: Any Firearm or Firearm Accessory Designed to Launch Explosives
Item # 5.
Item / Equipment Approved Qty (start
of year)
Qty Deployed
(Training)
Qty Deployed
(Field)
Qty Purchased to
Maintain approved
stock
End-of-Year
Deployable
Inventory
Notes / Model Lifespan Unit Cost ($) Total Cost in
2025 ($)
CTS Mini Flash-Bang (Model 7290M) 24 (24) 12 0 12 24 12 expired/expiring used in training and replaced 5 Years 48.01 $ 1,098.41 40mm CTS White Smoke Multi-Projectile 4 (4) 4 0 0 0 Previous inventory expired and non-replaced 5 Years 28 $ - 40mm CTS Liquid CS (Model 4330) Ferret 8 (8) 2 0 0 0
2 expended in training. 4 earmarked for upcoming instructor school usage. Requested cap increase to 12 in 2026 to
accommodate upcoming training.
5 Years 36.45 $ -
CTS Baffled Riot CS Smoke Canister (Model 5230B) 10 (10) 0 0 0 0 All expired. Retained for futrue training, NOT DEPLOYABLE.
May request replacement in the future. 5 Years 44.14 $ - Defense Tech White Smoke Han-Ball 4 (4) 0 0 0 0 All expired. Retained for futrue training, NOT DEPLOYABLE.
Will not be replacing. 5 Years 32.95 $ -
TOTAL REPLACEMENT COST $ 1,098.41
* Minimum flash-bang order: 12 units.
Section 12: Flashbang Grenades, Explosive Breaching Tools, Tear Gas, and Pepper Balls Report Date: February 24, 2026 | Grass Valley Police Department
Item # 5.
— Not Utilized —
Section 13: Taser Shockwave, Microwave Weapons, Water Cannons, and LRAD
Item # 5.
Item / Equipment Approved Qty (start
of year)
Qty Deployed
(Training)
Qty Deployed
(Field)
Qty Purchased to
Maintain approved
stock
End-of-Year
Deployable
Inventory
Notes / Model Lifespan Unit Cost ($) Total Cost in
2025 ($)
40mm DT eXact iMpact Sponge Rounds 40 (40) 3 0 0 0 Remaining 37 rounds expired. Retained for Training.
Intending to restock to approved qty. in 2026 5 Years 33.45 $ - 40mm DT Bean Bag Rounds 12 (12) 2 0 0 0 Remaining 10 rounds expired. Retained for Training.
Intending to restock to approved qty. in 2026 5 Years 28.15 $ - 40mm LMT Launcher — Tactical 1 0 0 0 1 Assigned to SRU N/A 1025 $ - 40mm LMT Launcher — Patrol 2 0 0 0 2 Patrol (2 units @ $819 each) N/A 819 $ - TOTAL REPLACEMENT COST $ -
Section 14: 40mm Projectile Launchers, Bean Bag, Rubber Bullet, and Specialty Impact Munitions Report Date: February 24, 2026 | Grass Valley Police Department
Item # 5.
— Not Utilized —
Section 15: Any Other Equipment as Determined Needing Additional Oversight
Item # 5.
Item # 5.
Item # 5.
Item # 5.
Item # 5.
Policy
706
Grass Valley Police Department
Grass Valley PD CA Policy Manual
Military Equipment
706.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the approval, acquisition, and reporting requirements of military equipment (Government Code § 7070; Government Code § 7071; Government Code § 7072).
706.1.1 DEFINITIONS
Definitions related to this policy include (Government Code § 7070):
Governing body – The elected or appointed body that oversees the Department. (i.e. the Grass Valley City Council).
Military equipment – AB 481's definition of "military equipment" is not "equipment used by the military" or "equipment acquired from the military," but instead reaches 15 categories of equipment however acquired from whatever source:
1. Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles.
2. Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers.
However, police versions of standard consumer vehicles are specifically excluded from this subdivision.
3. High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), commonly referred to as Humvees, two and one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached. However, unarmored all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) and motorized dirt bikes are specifically excluded from this subdivision.
4. Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants and utilize a tracked system instead of wheels for forward motion.
5. Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units.
6. Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind.
7. Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature.
However, items designed to remove a lock, such as bolt cutters, or a handheld ram designed to be operated by one person, are specifically excluded from this subdivision.
8. Firearms of.50 caliber or greater. However, standard issue shotguns are specifically excluded from this subdivision.
9. Ammunition of.50 caliber or greater. However, standard issue shotgun ammunition is specifically excluded from this subdivision.
10. Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than.50 caliber, including assault weapons as defined in Sections 30510 and 30515 of the Penal Code, with the exception of standard issue service weapons and ammunition of less than.50 caliber that are issued to officers, agents, or employees of a law enforcement agency or a state agency.
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/03/23, All Rights Reserved.
Published with permission by Grass Valley Police Department Military Equipment - 513 Page 96 Item # 5.
Grass Valley Police Department
Grass Valley PD CA Policy Manual
Grass Valley PD CA Policy Manual
Military Equipment
11. Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles.
12. 'Flashbang' grenades and explosive breaching tools, 'tear gas,' and 'pepper balls,' excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.
13. Taser Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and the Long Range Acoustic Device(LRAD).
14. The following projectile launch platforms and their associated munitions: 40mm projectile launchers, 'bean bag,' rubber bullet, and specialty impact munition (SIM) weapons.
15. Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.
706.2 POLICY
It is the policy of the Grass Valley Police Department that members of this department comply with the provisions of Government Code § 7071 with respect to military equipment. 706.3 MILITARY EQUIPMENT COORDINATOR
The Chief of Police should designate a member of this department to act as the military equipment coordinator. The responsibilities of the military equipment coordinator include but are not limited to:
(a) Acting as liaison to the governing body for matters related to the requirements of this policy.
(b) Identifying department equipment that qualifies as military equipment in the current possession of the Department, or the equipment the Department intends to acquire that requires approval by the city council.
(c) Conducting an inventory of all military equipment at least annually. (d) Collaborating with any allied agency that may use military equipment within the jurisdiction of Grass Valley Police Department (Government Code § 7071). (e) Preparing for, scheduling, and coordinating the annual community engagement meeting to include:
1. Publicizing the details of the meeting.
2. Preparing for public questions regarding the department's funding, acquisition, and use of equipment.
(f) Preparing the annual military equipment report for submission to the Chief of Police and ensuring that the report is made available on the department website (Government Code § 7072).
(g) Establishing the procedure for a person to register a complaint or concern, or how that person may submit a question about the use of a type of military equipment, and how the Department will respond in a timely manner.
706.4 MILITARY EQUIPMENT INVENTORY
The following constitutes a list of qualifying equipment for the Department:
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/03/23, All Rights Reserved.
Published with permission by Grass Valley Police Department Military Equipment - 514 Page 97 Item # 5.
Grass Valley Police Department
Grass Valley PD CA Policy Manual
Grass Valley PD CA Policy Manual
Military Equipment
See attachment: Grass Valley PD Military Equipment List 706.5 APPROVAL
The Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall obtain approval from the city council by way of an ordinance adopting the military equipment policy. As part of the approval process, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall ensure the proposed military equipment policy is submitted to the city council and is available on the department website at least 30 days prior to any public hearing concerning the military equipment at issue (Government Code § 7071). The military equipment policy must be approved by the city council prior to engaging in any of the following (Government Code § 7071):
(a) Requesting military equipment made available pursuant to 10 USC § 2576a. (b) Seeking funds for military equipment, including but not limited to applying for a grant, soliciting or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers.
(c) Acquiring military equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.
(d) Collaborating with another law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the jurisdiction of this department. (e) Using any new or existing military equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the city council.
(f) Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of military equipment.
(g) Acquiring military equipment through any means not provided above. 706.6 COORDINATION WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS
Military equipment used by any member of this Department shall be approved for use and in accordance with this Department policy. Military equipment used by other jurisdictions that are providing mutual aid to this Department, or otherwise conducting law enforcement activities in this jurisdiction, shall comply with their respective military equipment use policies in performing such actions.
706.7 ANNUAL REPORT
Upon approval of a military equipment policy, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall submit a military equipment report to the city council for each type of military equipment approved within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use (Government Code § 7072).
The Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall also make each annual military equipment report publicly available on the department website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The report shall include all information required by Government Code § 7072 for the preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment in department inventory.
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/03/23, All Rights Reserved.
Published with permission by Grass Valley Police Department Military Equipment - 515 Page 98 Item # 5.
Grass Valley Police Department
Grass Valley PD CA Policy Manual
Grass Valley PD CA Policy Manual
Military Equipment
706.8 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the annual report, the Department shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the Department should discuss the report and respond to public questions regarding the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2023/03/23, All Rights Reserved.
Published with permission by Grass Valley Police Department Military Equipment - 516 Page 99 Item # 5.
City of Grass Valley
City Council
Agenda Action Sheet
Title: Resolution Recognizing and Adopting Culture Forward 2026-2032: Nevada County’s Arts & Culture Action Plan
CEQA: Not a project
Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution 2026-09 recognizing and adopting Culture Forward 2026-2032 as a guiding framework supporting the continued vitality of arts, culture, and the creative economy in Nevada County.
Prepared by: Taylor Whittingslow, Deputy City Manager
Council Meeting Date: 4/28/2026 Date Prepared: 4/9/2026 Agenda: Administrative
Background Information: Nevada County has long been recognized for its vibrant arts and cultural community, which contributes significantly to the region’s economy, tourism appeal, community identity, and quality of life.
The Nevada County Arts Council, the County’s designated State-Local Partner to the California Arts Council, serves as the countywide arts service organization and administers the Grass Valley–Nevada City Cultural District and the Truckee Cultural District, both designated by the State of California.
Over the last eighteen months, Nevada County Arts Council has led the development of Culture Forward 2026-2032: Nevada County’s Arts & Culture Action Plan, a six-year strategic framework designed to support the long-term vitality of arts and culture throughout Nevada County.
The plan was developed through a collaborative process that included community listening sessions, stakeholder engagement, surveys, and consultation with regional partners, educators, businesses, artists, cultural organizations, and local government representatives.
As part of the discovery process, the planning team conducted a thorough review of existing County and regional plans to ensure alignment with current policy priorities.
These include:
The County of Nevada’s Economic Development Action Plan Nevada County Office of Education’s Strategic Plan for Arts Education in Schools
Item # 6.
Nevada County’s Recreation and Resiliency Master Plan Area Plans for Greater Higgins, Loma Rica, North San Juan, Penn Valley, and Soda Springs
Visit California’s High Sierra and Gold Country Regional Strategic Tourism Plans Visit Truckee-Tahoe’s Two-Year Strategic Plan, Tourism Economic Impact Report, and regional brand position Mountain Heart. Small-Town Soul. Sierra Business Council’s Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) 2023-2027
Through this alignment process, Culture Forward provides a coordinated cultural framework that complements and strengthens existing regional, county, and community planning efforts.
Culture Forward identifies several strategic priorities intended to strengthen Nevada County’s creative economy and cultural infrastructure over the coming six-year period.
These priorities include expanding creative career pathways, supporting artists and cultural organizations, improving coordination of cultural assets, advancing cultural tourism experiences, and implementing a regional marketing plan for the Arts.
While Culture Forward was developed through a community-led process rather than as a County departmental plan, it represents a significant collaborative effort intended to support broader County objectives related to economic development, tourism, education, and community vitality.
Adoption of the Resolution signals the government’s recognition of the plan and its support for continued collaboration with Nevada County Arts Council and regional partners in advancing arts and culture initiatives where appropriate.
The Resolution does not create regulatory authority or fiscal obligations and does not require City departments to implement specific programs. Rather, it provides a shared strategic framework that may inform future partnerships and initiatives.
Adoption of this Resolution does not commit County or City funding. Any future initiatives associated with Culture Forward would return to the City Council for consideration through standard budgeting and approval processes.
Adoption of the Resolution recognizing Culture Forward: Nevada County’s Arts & Culture Action Plan acknowledges the importance of arts and culture to Nevada County’s identity, economy, and quality of life, while supporting continued collaboration between the City, County, Nevada County Arts Council, and regional partners.
Council Goals/Objectives: The Resolution Recognizing and Adopting Culture Forward 2026-2032: Nevada County’s Arts & Culture Action Plan executes portions of work tasks towards achieving/maintaining Strategic Plan – Economic Development Fiscal Impact: Adoption of this Resolution does not commit County or City funding.
Any future initiatives associated with Culture Forward would return to the City Council for consideration through standard budgeting and approval processes.
Item # 6.
Funds Available: N/A Account #: N/A
Reviewed by: Interim City Manager Attachments: R2026-09
Item # 6.
Item # 6.
2017—14 inaugural
California Cultural
Districts
Our Cultural District partners include Cities of
Grass Valley and Nevada City, Greater Grass Valley
Chamber of Commerce, Grass Valley Downtown
Association, and Nevada City Chamber of
Commerce; The Town of Truckee, Truckee Tahoe
Arts Alliance, Truckee Downtown Merchants
Association, and Truckee Chamber.
Item # 6.
December 2025
—10 new California
Cultural Districts
Item # 6.
Item # 6.
Arts, heart and soul
"The arts are not just a critical component of our
economy, they are where healing occurs, new
ideas emerge, and peace is made. We know
investing in the arts is an investment in the wellbeing of our residents, we want our communities to be a
place where families thrive and those who visit
feel at home.”
—Steve Frisch, President, Sierra Business Council
+1,400
Tax revenue to local, state,
and federal governments.
Full-time equivalent jobs
Generating an estimated in total $66 million economic activity. $13 million
Item # 6.
Item # 6.
Phases
01 DISCOVERY
AND FRAMING
Initial planning and
understanding of project
scope and context. 12
12 9
629
Expert interviews in a broad
range of areas/topics.
In-person listening
sessions
Local leaders
focus groups
Respondents to
bilingual survey
Culture Forward Arts and Culture Action Plan Nevada County Nevada County Arts Council 2025 The Process
2 Collaborative work sessions to
establish a unified vision for the sector. • An Economic and Social Impact Study of Arts and Culture Organizations and Their Audiences over a five-year time-frame • Nevada County Office of Education’s Strategic Plan for Arts Education in Schools 2020-25
• Upstate California Creative Corps' Impact Report
• The County of Nevada's Economic Development Action Plan 2024-2026
• Nevada County’s Recreation and Resiliency Master Plan
Item # 6.
Phases
01 DISCOVERY
AND FRAMING
Initial planning and
understanding of project
scope and context. 12
12 9
629
Expert interviews in a broad
range of areas/topics.
In-person listening
sessions
Local leaders
focus groups
Respondents to
bilingual survey
Culture Forward Arts and Culture Action Plan Nevada County Nevada County Arts Council 2025 The Process
2 Collaborative work sessions to
establish a unified vision for the sector. • Visit California’s High Sierra and Gold Country Regional Strategic Tourism Plans
• Sierra Business Council’s Comprehensive Economic
Development Strategy 2023-2027 (CEDS)
• ... and the unincorporated Area Plans for Greater Higgins, Loma Rica Industrial, North San Juan, Penn Valley, and Soda Springs.
Item # 6.
NEVADA
C O U N T Y
Twelve key
priorities
for arts and culture were
identified in the community
engagement process:
Community and
Sector Cohesion
Funding
Cultural
Perception Economic & Value
Mark
Destination
eting and Branding
Communications
Infrastructure
Arts Education
and Youth
Development
Artist Development
and Creative Careers
Artists
Leadership,
Government
and Policy
Space &
Infrastructure
Public-Private
Partnerships
Tourism &
Local Balance
Item # 6.
The Culture Forward Action Plan includes 3 implementation Implementation plans that provide direction and focus.
Plans The Strategic
Framework
Expressing vision
and alignment
The Funding Plan
Developing workforce capacity
for implementation
The Creative Career
Pathways Plan
Powering implementation
and sustainability
The Regional
Marketing Plan
Giving the plan visibility, voice
and a clear marking direction
Item # 6.
Cross-Cutting Areas
Implementation Matrix
(internal document)
All implementation plans include the following areas, plus an implementation matrix to aid the Culture Forward partners in creating specific activities to accomplish the Action Plan Situation Analysis
Evaluation Framework
Integration with Strategic
Framework and Other Plans
Toolkits, Donor Prospect
Lists, and other Supportive
Resources
Governance - Culture Forward
Implementation Committee and
Subcommittees
Item # 6.
Indicative Evaluation
Framework
The Culture Forward Implementation Committee will evaluate the Culture Forward Action Plan, through an assessment of Objectives and Key Results (OKRs). This committee will be composed of diverse stakeholders, including representatives from the Nevada County Arts Council, Grass Valley-Nevada City and Truckee Cultural Districts, local government, arts and culture organizations, community leaders, and members from historically underserved populations.
1. Activation, Recreation, and Engagement.
Cultural life across Nevada County through arts programming and accessible creative experiences for residents and visitors.
2. Learning, Skills, and Career Pathways.
Support a lifelong journey in the arts—from early exposure and education to mentorship, professional development, and sustained careers.
Number of cultural ambassadors engaged annually
Year-over-year growth or sustainability in overall attendance Percentage increase in engagement from historically underrepresented or marginalized communities (including elder adults) Increase in the number of cultural spaces and programming submissions to the Cultural Asset Map Number and diversity of partnerships established between Nevada County Arts Council and local/regional stakeholders
Percentage increase in arts education programs in TK-14 schools Number and percentage increase of internship, fellowship, or apprenticeship programs in arts organizations
Indicators defined in the Workforce Development Plan
Retention rate of cultural workers within local arts organizations over time
Number of creative jobs created or sustained in the county
Item # 6.
How to reach us:
Eliza Tudor, Executive Director Nevada County Arts Council Kellie Cutler, Truckee Cultural District Program Manager Diana Arbex, GVNC Cultural District Program Manager
Michaelyn Logue, Social Media and Community Engagement
nevadacountyarts.org
cultureforwardca.org
530-264-7031
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Item # 6.
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-09
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRASS VALLEY RECOGNIZING AND ADOPTING CULTURE FORWARD 2026-2032: NEVADA COUNTY’S ARTS &
CULTURE ACTION PLAN
WHEREAS The arts, culture, and creative industries contribute significantly to the social, economic, and civic vitality of Nevada County, strengthening community identity, supporting local businesses, and enhancing quality of life for residents and visitors alike; and WHEREAS, Nevada County has long been recognized as a center of artistic excellence and cultural heritage, supported by a vibrant network of artists, nonprofit organizations, cultural venues, historic districts, and creative enterprises; and WHEREAS, The Nevada County Arts Council, the County’s designated State-Local Partner to the California Arts Council, serves as the countywide arts service organization and administers two State-designated California Cultural Districts: the Grass Valley–Nevada City Cultural District and the Truckee Cultural District; and
WHEREAS, Nevada County Arts Council has led the development of Culture Forward: Nevada County’s Arts & Culture Action Plan, a five-to-ten-year strategic framework intended to guide the continued growth and sustainability of arts and culture across Nevada County; and WHEREAS, The development of Culture Forward included extensive community engagement through listening sessions, surveys, and stakeholder consultations with artists, educators, cultural organizations, local government, businesses, and community members across the County; and
WHEREAS, A key component of the planning process included a comprehensive review of existing regional and local plans to ensure alignment with ongoing public policy and economic development efforts, including:
● Nevada County Office of Education’s Strategic Plan for Arts Education in Schools ● The County of Nevada’s Economic Development Action Plan ● The County of Nevada’s Recreation and Resiliency Master Plan ● Area Plans for Greater Higgins, Loma Rica Industrial, North San Juan, Penn Valley, and Soda Springs
● Visit California’s High Sierra and Gold Country Regional Strategic Tourism Plans ● Visit Truckee-Tahoe’s Two-Year Strategic Plan and Tourism Economic Impact Report ● Sierra Business Council’s Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) 2023– 2027; and
WHEREAS, Culture Forward provides a coordinated arts and cultural framework that complements and strengthens these existing regional, county, and community planning efforts; and
WHEREAS, The City Council recognizes the value of community-initiated planning processes led by trusted regional partners, particularly where such processes leverage state partnerships and community collaboration to advance shared public goals; and
Item # 6.
2 WHEREAS, The Council acknowledges that arts and culture play a vital role in supporting economic development, tourism vitality, educational opportunity, and community resilience.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the City Council of the City of Grass Valley hereby recognizes and adopts Culture Forward 2026-2032: Nevada County’s Arts & Culture Action Plan as a guiding framework supporting the continued vitality of arts and culture throughout Nevada County; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That adoption of this Resolution signifies the Council’s support for the vision and strategic direction outlined in Culture Forward and its interest in continued collaboration with Nevada County Arts Council and community partners to advance arts and culture initiatives where feasible; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Council encourages City departments, community partners, and regional stakeholders to consider Culture Forward as a resource for planning, coordination, and alignment in areas related to arts, culture, economic development, tourism, and community vitality; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That nothing in this Resolution shall be interpreted as committing City resources beyond those approved through the City’s regular budgeting and decisionmaking processes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Council expresses its appreciation to Nevada County Arts Council and the many community members and regional partners whose contributions helped shape Culture Forward.
PASSED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Grass Valley, State of California, on this 28th day of April, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
_______________________________ ________________________________ Hilary Hodge, Mayor David Rudderman, City Attorney
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Taylor Whittingslow, City Clerk
Item # 6.