Cities Index.
Agenda

Greenfield City Council
October 11, 2022

Document
Agenda
Meeting
October 11, 2022
Body
Greenfield City Council
Pages
5
Original file
13.3 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on www.greenfieldca.gov. That file is the official record.

City of Greenfield
599 El Camino Real
Greenfield, CA 93927
City Council Meeting Agenda
October 11, 2022
6:00 P.M.

Mayor Lance Walker
Mayor Pro-Tem, Angela M. Untalon
Councilmembers
Yanely Martinez
Andrew Tipton
Robert White
The Greenfield City Council meeting on October 11, 2022 at 6:00 p.m. will be held in the City Council Chambers located at 599 El Camino Real, Greenfield, California 93927, and will be open to the public. This meeting will also be accessible online and may be viewed through the following options:

Facebook Live: https://www.facebook.com/GreenfieldCA/
Join Zoom Meeting: http://meeting.ci.greenfield.ca.us
Meeting ID: 844 8164 8935
PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES.

A. CALL TO ORDER
B. ROLL CALL – CITY COUNCIL
C. INVOCATION PASTOR INES VERLUGO
D. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
City Council Agenda
October 11, 2022

Page 2 ends

E. AGENDA REVIEW
F. PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA This portion of the Agenda allows an individual the opportunity to address the Council on any items not on the Closed Session, Consent Calendar, Public Hearings, and City Council Business. Under state regulations, no action can be taken on non-agenda items, including issues raised under this agenda item. Members of the public should be aware of this when addressing the Council regarding items not specifically referenced on this Agenda.

PLEASE NOTE: Public comments may be made in the following formats: in person, through Zoom, or by email. If you wish to make a public comment through Zoom, please use the “raise your hand” feature during the public comment section. You will be selected by the meeting host and will be allowed to say your comment aloud. If you wish to make a public comment through email, please submit your public comment to [email protected].

In the email subject line, please write your name and the agenda item or topic you are commenting on. If you wish to submit a public comment on more than one agenda item or topic, please send a separate email for each agenda item or topic you are commenting. All public comments submitted through email must be received no later than 12:00 p.m. (noon) on October 10, 2022. Comments submitted through email on time will be incorporated into the City Council Agenda and made part of the record for the meeting. Comments submitted by email that are not received on time will not be accepted. Public comments submitted by email will not be read aloud during the meeting. Please be aware that written public comments, including your name, may become public information.

G. COMMENTS FROM CITY COUNCIL
H. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one action of the City Council, unless a request for removal for discussion or explanation is received prior to the time Council votes on the motion to adopt. a. Public Comments
H-1. APPROVE Warrants #316246 through #316347 and Bank Drafts #5051 through #5071 in the amount of $739,015.08 – Page 1
H-2. APPROVE Minutes of the September 27, 2022 City Council Meeting – Page 22 H-3. RECEIVE AND FILE – Monthly Report – Finance Department – Page 29 H-4. ADOPTION of Resolution #2022-91, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Rescheduling the November 8, 2022 City Council Meeting to November 15, 2022 – Page 30
I. MAYOR’S PRESENTATION, PROCLAMATIONS, COMMUNICATIONS, RESOLUTIONS I-1. PROCLAMATION – Proclaiming October 2022 as Breast Cancer Awareness Month – Page 31
I-2. PROCLAMATION – Proclaiming October 13, 2022 as Children’s Environmental Health Day – Page 32
City Council Agenda
October 11, 2022

Page 3 ends

I-3. PRESENTATION – Sun Street Update / Cal VIP Update
I-4. PRESENTATION – Code Enforcement Update
I-5. PRESENTATION – League of California Cities Conference J. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
J-1. ADOPTION of A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Awarding a Professional Contract to Denise Duffy & Associates in the Amount of $99,949.00 for the CEQA/NEPA Review and Documentation for the City Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project and Authorizing the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute the Contract and Assign Additional Work in Accordance with this Resolution – Page 33 a. Staff Report
b. Public Comments
c. City Council Comments / Review / Action
Staff Recommended Action / Adopt Resolution #2022-92
J-2. ADOPTION of A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Awarding a Professional Contract to Denise Duffy & Associates in the Amount of $126,970.00 for the CEQA/NEPA Review and Documentation for the City Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent Disposal Spray Field Expansion and Authorizing the City Manager Improvement Project and Authorizing the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute the Contract and Assign Additional Work in Accordance with this Resolution – Page 60 a. Staff Report
b. Public Comments
c. City Council Comments / Review / Action
Staff Recommended Action / Adopt Resolution #2022-93
J-3. ADOPTION of A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Approving an Initial Budget for the Implementation of a New City Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), Awarding a Professional Services Contract to Hydroscience Engineers in the Not-to-Exceed Amount of $4,185,566 for Design Services for the New WWTP and Related Improvements, and Authorizing the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute the Contract and Assign Additional Work in Accordance with this Resolution – Page 95 a. Staff Report
b. Public Comments
c. City Council Comments / Review / Action
Staff Recommended Action / Adopt Resolution #2022-94
J-4. ADOPTION of A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Approving Construction Project Management Services as an Extension of Professional Services Previously Provided by NV5 in the Amount of $267,776 for the Apple Avenue Consolidation Project and Authorizing the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute the Contract and Assign Additional Work in Accordance with this Resolution – Page 125 a. Staff Report
b. Public Comments
c. City Council Comments / Review / Action
Staff Recommended Action / Adopt Resolution #2022-95
City Council Agenda
October 11, 2022

Page 4 ends

J-5. ADOPTION of A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Approving a Public Works Emergency Supplemental Appropriation and Approve an Agreement to Extend the Agreement with Grade Break Engineering for Water Leak Repairs in the Amount of $95,000 – Page 149
a. Staff Report
b. Public Comments
c. City Council Comments / Review / Action
Staff Recommended Action / Adopt Resolution #2022-96
J-6. ADOPTION of A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Approving the Regional Funding Agreement for Pedestrian and Bicycle Wayfinding Program Between the Transportation Agency for Monterey County and the City of Greenfield – Page 152 a. Staff Report
b. Public Comments
c. City Council Comments / Review / Action
Staff Recommended Action / Adopt Resolution #2022-97
J-7. APPOINTMENT of Members to the Parks & Recreation Committee – Page 260 a. Oral Report
b. Public Comments
c. City Council Comments / Review / Action
Staff Recommended Action / Appoint Members
J-8. ADOPTION of A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield to Reclassify the Positions of Animal Control Officer and Code Enforcement Officer to Community Service Officer (CSO) and Amending the Salary Schedule – Page 264 a. Staff Report
b. Public Comments
c. City Council Comments / Review / Action
Staff Recommended Action / Adopt Resolution #2022-98
K. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
K-1. GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(D)(2)
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Paragraph (3) of Subdivision (e) of Section 54956.9. There is one potential lawsuit.
a. Public Comments
L. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION
M. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
N. CITY MANAGER REPORT
O. ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (831) 674-5591. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the meeting (CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II). ********************************************************************************* This agenda is duly posted outside City Hall and on the City of Greenfield web site. 10/7/2022 12:54:37 PM Page 1 of 4
Check Report
Greenfield, CA By Check Number
Date Range: 09/24/2022 - 10/07/2022
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Bank Code: APBNK-APBNK
00749 CITY OF GREENFIELD 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 151.10 316246 00713 G P O A 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 960.00 316247
00795 GREENFIELD POLICE SERGEANTS ASSOCIATION 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 200.00 316248 04521 Greenfield Professional Firefighters 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 315.00 316249 01911 SEIU Local 521 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 572.06 316250 04715 4LEAF, INC 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 38,613.75 316251 00180 ALL SAFE INTEGRATED SYSTEMS 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 75.00 316252 00119 AT&T 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 888.13 316253
05154 BENGARD REALTY 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 3,750.00 316254 03971 CARDLOCK VENDING, INC. 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 235.00 316255 00396 CASEY PRINTING 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 1,398.69 316256 04407 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 388.34 316257 04681 CLARK PEST CONTROL 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 164.00 316258 00444 DAN'S TIRE & AUTO SERV 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 156.95 316259 04659 DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 7.50 316260 05103 DRIVE CUSTOMS 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 31,738.88 316261 05008 EAST BAY TIRE CO. 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 522.66 316262 00631 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. 795 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 39.33 316263 00647 FIRST NIGHT MONTEREY, INC. 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 4,368.00 316264 00647 FIRST NIGHT MONTEREY, INC. 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 15,000.00 316265 04525 GOLDEN STATE TRUCK & TRAILER REPAIR 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 1,207.39 316266 00720 GRAINGER 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 2,415.22 316267
00794 GREEN LINE AND TOM'S SEPTIC TANK SERVICE 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 2,136.25 316268 00725 GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 159.79 316269 00721 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 166.69 316270 05130 HARDEE POLYGRAPH SERVICES 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 600.00 316271 04322 HARTNELL COLLEGE 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 7,070.83 316272 00803 HYDRO TURF, INC. 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 782.93 316273 04418 INDUSTRIAL PUMP SHOP, INC. 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 6,459.95 316274 01028 J.R. INTERPRETING SERVICES 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 344.00 316275 01925 JOSE SANCHEZ 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 2,530.10 316276 01263 LARA'S PHOTO SHOP 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 30.66 316277 01258 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 256.50 316278 13004 MONTEREY BAY ANALYTICAL SERVICE 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 1,588.00 316279 04984 MONTEREY PENINSULA VETERINARY EMERGENCY AND SPECIALTY CENTER 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 273.24 316280 04653 NEW SV MEDIA, INC 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 1,987.50 316281 01532 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 180.39 316282 01601 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 5,089.42 316283 03940 Regional Government Services 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 5,235.45 316284 04924 RELIABLE TRANSLATIONS CORP 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 76.64 316285 01978 SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS, INC. 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 324.12 316286 01999 SALINAS VALLEY SOLID WASTE AUTHORITY 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 65,196.94 316287 04656 SHARPS SOLUTIONS, LLC 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 200.00 316288 01988 SIRCHIE ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 310.80 316289 01933 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAPING 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 15,580.00 316290 01945 SOUTH COUNTY TIRE 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 225.86 316291 01998 STANDARD INSURANCE COM 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 4,586.73 316292 04315 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 541.37 316293 09396 SWIFT TECTONICS, INC. 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 14,880.00 316294 04465 TARGET PEST CONTROL 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 95.00 316295 04557 TODD GROUNDWATER 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 1,228.75 316296 03919 TPX COMMUNICATIONS 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 2,448.72 316297 02002 TRI-COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 168.21 316298 00634 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 75.00 316299 1 Check Report Date Range: 09/24/2022 - 10/07/2022
10/7/2022 12:54:37 PM Page 2 of 4
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number 04505 UNITED WAY MONTEREY COUNTY 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 5,000.00 316300 04968 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA, INC. 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 6,899.38 316301 02234 VALLEY TROPHIES & DETECTORS 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 41.52 316302 02201 VEGETABLE GROWERS SUPPLY 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 104.88 316303 04079 VERIZON 09/30/2022 Regular 0.00 741.00 316304
04889 1002 WALNUT AVE L.P. 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 1,982.00 316305 05157 36 NORTH PROPERTIES, INC. 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 172.87 316306 05157 36 NORTH PROPERTIES, INC. 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 1,689.50 316307 00156 AMERICAN SUPPLY COMPANY 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 86.51 316308 00130 AT&T 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 467.64 316309
00153 AT&T 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 69.55 316310
04456 CALIFORNIA PREMIER RESTORATION 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 1,800.00 316311 04407 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 305.84 316312 03950 CSC of King City 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 10.53 316313 04287 FLUID RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 48,186.30 316314 00720 GRAINGER 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 192.43 316315
00725 GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 203.02 316316 00721 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 78.67 316317 00705 GREEN'S ACCOUNTING 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 2,040.00 316318 04708 HR & ASSOCIATES, LLC 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 19,228.00 316319 05156 JAIME MARTINEZ 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 169.33 316320 04498 JESUS EDUARDO ESPINOSA 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 112.76 316321 01113 KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 67.17 316322 03107 L.N. CURTIS & SONS 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 1,197.77 316323 03880 MBS BUSINESS SYSTEMS 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 547.78 316324 04478 MCKESSON MEDICAL-SURGICAL GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS LLC 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 105.55 316325 01300 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 41.83 316326 13015 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 7,434.46 316327 04670 NAPA AUTO PARTS 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 280.53 316328 03896 NICK'S GARAGE 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 289.50 316329 01506 OFFICE DEPOT 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 183.89 316330 01532 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 67.01 316331 01601 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 309.84 316332 01601 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 8,965.60 316333 05145 PIINI REALTY INC. 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 5,000.00 316334 04661 QUALITY WATER ENTERPRISES INC 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 35.00 316335 04577 RINCON CONSULTANTS, INC 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 3,375.75 316336 04338 SHRED-IT USA 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 164.43 316337 04835 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRICANTS, LLC 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 8,861.09 316338 01944 SWRCB 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 205.00 316339
05159 TERRACINA OAKS II APARTMENTS 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 2,847.00 316340 04937 T-MOBILE 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 32.56 316341
02037 TRI-CITIES DISPOSAL 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 120,413.86 316342 02234 VALLEY TROPHIES & DETECTORS 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 51.35 316343 02201 VEGETABLE GROWERS SUPPLY 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 104.88 316344 02210 VERIZON WIRELESS 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 2,769.70 316345 04766 XIO, INC. 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 2,046.00 316346 03987 U.S. BANK 10/07/2022 Regular 0.00 36,251.35 316347 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 09/30/2022 Bank Draft 0.00 213.41 DFT0005051 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 09/30/2022 Bank Draft 0.00 178.00 DFT0005052 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 09/30/2022 Bank Draft 0.00 515.00 DFT0005053 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 09/30/2022 Bank Draft 0.00 2,070.00 DFT0005054 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 09/30/2022 Bank Draft 0.00 1,893.94 DFT0005055 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 09/30/2022 Bank Draft 0.00 275.00 DFT0005056 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 09/30/2022 Bank Draft 0.00 1,145.00 DFT0005057 00431 DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES 09/30/2022 Bank Draft 0.00 1,707.99 DFT0005058 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 09/30/2022 Bank Draft 0.00 942.50 DFT0005059 00384 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD 09/30/2022 Bank Draft 0.00 3,252.42 DFT0005060 03103 Internal Revenue Service 09/30/2022 Bank Draft 0.00 9,456.13 DFT0005061 03103 Internal Revenue Service 09/30/2022 Bank Draft 0.00 29,477.86 DFT0005062 00384 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD 09/30/2022 Bank Draft 0.00 11,791.24 DFT0005063 2 Check Report Date Range: 09/24/2022 - 10/07/2022
10/7/2022 12:54:37 PM Page 3 of 4
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number 03103 Internal Revenue Service 09/30/2022 Bank Draft 0.00 30,876.88 DFT0005064 00215 ANTHEM - BLUE CROSS 09/30/2022 Bank Draft 0.00 86,636.03 DFT0005065 00384 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD 10/05/2022 Bank Draft 0.00 103.14 DFT0005066 03103 Internal Revenue Service 10/05/2022 Bank Draft 0.00 271.88 DFT0005067 03103 Internal Revenue Service 10/05/2022 Bank Draft 0.00 1,162.56 DFT0005068 00384 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD 10/05/2022 Bank Draft 0.00 36.93 DFT0005069 03103 Internal Revenue Service 10/05/2022 Bank Draft 0.00 43.41 DFT0005070 04762 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST 10/07/2022 Bank Draft 0.00 21,738.29 DFT0005071 Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Discount
Payment
Payment Type Count
Bank Code APBNK Summary
Bank Drafts
EFT's
102
0 0
21 0

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 123 0.00
Payment
535,227.47

0.00 0.00
203,787.61

0.00 739,015.08
Payable
Count
176
0 0
23 0
199
3 Check Report Date Range: 09/24/2022 - 10/07/2022
10/7/2022 12:54:37 PM Page 4 of 4
All Bank Codes Check Summary
Payment Type Discount
Payment
Count Payment
Payable
Count
Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Bank Drafts
EFT's
102
0 0
21 0

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 123 0.00
535,227.47

0.00 0.00
203,787.61

0.00 739,015.08
176
0 0
23 0
199
Fund Name Period Amount
Fund Summary
999 CASH CONTROL 9/2022 437,215.02
999 CASH CONTROL 10/2022 301,800.06
739,015.08
4 10/7/2022 12:55:51 PM Page 1 of 17
Expense Approval Report
Greenfield, CA By Fund
Payment Dates 9/24/2022 - 10/7/2022
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount Fund: 100 - GENERAL FUND
CALIFORNIA PREMIER RESTORA…316311 10/07/2022 TEMPORARY FENCE 137 6TH ST 100-12351 900.00 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 316327 10/07/2022 808 APPLE AVENUE PROJECT 100-22497 239.75 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 316327 10/07/2022 296 APPLE AVENUE SUBDIVISI… 100-22512 300.00 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 316327 10/07/2022 4TH STREET AT APPLE AVE DEV… 100-22495 44.71 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 100-201-95690.000 1,478.54 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 100-215-95690.000 2,798.61 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 100-320-95690.000 460.46 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 100-551-81500.000 460.46 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 100-601-95690.000 460.77 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 100-201-95690.000 1,477.40 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 100-215-95690.000 2,796.46 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 100-320-95690.000 460.10 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 100-551-81500.000 460.10 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 100-601-95690.000 460.41 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 WALMART - NNO 2022 RAFFLE … 100-105-78100.000 515.34 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 WALMART - NNO 2022 RAFFLE … 100-105-78100.000 121.14 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 CSULB - GUTIERREZ FIELD TRAIN…100-215-67200.000 12.03 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 PETRO - FUEL - SLI 6 TRAINING 100-215-67200.000 42.39 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 LOVES - TRIP TO LA - SLI SESSIO… 100-215-67200.000 35.48 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 ALASKA AIRLINES - GUZMAN SLI…100-215-67200.000 28.99 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 UBER - ACCIDENTAL CHARGE BY…100-215-67200.000 13.19 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 SAVAGE TRAINING GROUP - FIE… 100-215-67200.000 595.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 PAYPAL - SURVEILLANCE TRAIN… 100-215-67200.000 595.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 SLI 7 SAN DIEGO - REFUND GU… 100-215-67200.000 -20.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 PAYPAL - SURVEILLANCE TRAIN… 100-215-67200.000 595.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 HILTON - SLI 6 TRAINING LAX G… 100-215-67200.000 411.09 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 PAYPAL - SURVEILLANCE TRAIN… 100-215-67200.000 595.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 ALASKA AIRLINES - GUZMAN SLI…100-215-67200.000 377.99 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 CSULB - GUTIERREZ FIELD TRAIN…100-215-67200.000 454.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 RESIDENCE INN - LERMA DEFEN…100-215-67200.000 134.11 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 UNITED AIRLINES - SLI 7 SAN DI… 100-215-67200.000 54.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 UNITED AIRLINES - SLI 7 SAN DI… 100-215-67200.000 54.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 INTUIT - TEMP FENCING 100-12351 128.12 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 COSTCO - OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-310-61400.000 39.31 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMPM - CAR WASH 100-310-65100.000 12.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 HOME DEPOT - KEY RAIL 100-310-65100.000 26.10 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES - FLIGHT …100-310-67200.000 60.20 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 CASQA - CONFERENCE 100-310-67200.000 180.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES - FLIGHT …100-320-67200.000 60.20 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 CASQA - CONFERENCE 100-320-67200.000 180.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 CASQA - CONFERENCE 100-550-67400.000 180.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES - FLIGHT …100-550-67400.000 60.20 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 HANDCUFF WAREHOUSE - POLI… 100-215-65200.000 151.20 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 CHEVRON - UNIT 30 DEFENSIVE… 100-215-67200.000 90.89 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 CIVIC CENTER - UNIT 30 ZETX 100-215-67200.000 62.38 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 RESIDENCE INN - DEFENSIVE TA… 100-215-67200.000 670.55 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 CIR INC - CHILD FORENSIC INTE… 100-215-67200.000 -1,200.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICE…100-110-67200.000 420.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 COSTCO - EMPLOYEE APPRECIA… 100-101-68200.000 875.03 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 CLARK PEST CONTROL - CM HO… 100-110-63900.000 103.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 LC ACTION POLICE SUPPLY, LTD …100-22481 2,416.10 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - SAFETY / WELLNESS …100-22491 60.21 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-22491 79.99 5 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 9/24/2022 - 10/7/2022 10/7/2022 12:55:51 PM Page 2 of 17
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-22491 57.71 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 OFFICE DEPOT - OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-601-61400.000 9.86 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 OFFICE DEPOT - OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-601-61400.000 111.55 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AUTOZONE - VEHICLE MAINTE… 100-601-66200.000 14.54 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 EL RINCONCITO - DEPARTMENT…100-601-67100.000 67.32 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 DOLLAR GENERAL - OFFICE SUP… 100-601-67100.000 19.71 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 EVENT BRITE - BUILDING CODE … 100-601-67200.000 150.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 SP CONSTRUCTION - ELECTRICA…100-601-67200.000 995.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 RITE AID - NNO 2022 RAFFLE PR…100-105-78100.000 265.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 DOLLAR GENERAL - NNO 2022 … 100-105-78100.000 34.99 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - COMMUNITY OUTR… 100-105-78100.000 82.84 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - COMMUNITY OUTR… 100-105-78100.000 71.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - COMMUNITY OUTR… 100-105-78100.000 32.82 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 PAYPAL - COMMUNITY OUTREA…100-105-78100.000 52.79 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - COMMUNITY OUTR… 100-105-78100.000 87.59 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 DIRECTV (WILL BE CREDITED BA…100-201-63900.000 100.99 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - STAFF RETIREMENT … 100-201-65100.000 26.27 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - STAFF RETIREMENT … 100-201-65100.000 92.88 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - GARBAGE BAGS FOR…100-201-65600.000 15.32 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - HARDWARE SUPPLIE…100-201-65900.000 53.51 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - COMMUNITY OUTR… 100-201-68200.000 21.88 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 FEDEX - POSTAGE 100-215-61100.000 146.07 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-215-61400.000 10.94 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-215-61400.000 50.87 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 TRANSUNION - FRAUD / CREDIT…100-215-63400.000 75.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - BOX DISPLAY FOR S… 100-215-65100.000 24.96 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 SAFEWAY - EJ'S RETIREMENT 100-215-65100.000 52.58 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - PD VEHICLES CLEAN… 100-215-65100.000 26.83 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 HOME DEPOT - POLICE LINE TA… 100-215-65400.000 152.42 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 UNITED AIRLINES - MATTKE TRA…100-215-67200.000 152.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 UNITED AIRLINES - DYELS TRAIN…100-215-67200.000 152.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 UNITED AIRLINES - DYELS TRAIN…100-215-67200.000 152.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 UNITED AIRLINES - MATTKE TRA…100-215-67200.000 797.20 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 UNITED AIRLINES - MATTKE TRA…100-215-67200.000 152.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 UNITED AIRLINES - DYELS TRAIN…100-215-67200.000 797.20 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - ACO KENNEL SUPPLI… 100-230-65400.000 131.36 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 MCDONALDS - BREAKFAST AT … 100-215-63400.000 85.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 PG&E - CITY CAMERAS ELECTRIC…100-215-63400.000 871.11 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 SALINAS CITY BBQ - EJ'S RETIR… 100-215-65100.000 855.43 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-190-61400.000 195.06 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 SMART & FINAL - NNO 2022 100-105-78100.000 83.27 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 COSTCO - NNO 2022 100-201-68200.000 470.83 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 CHEVRON - FUEL UNIT 39 - SEA… 100-215-63400.000 90.52 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 CHEVRON - FUEL UNIT 39 - CASE…100-215-63400.000 96.60 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 PARTY CITY - NNO SGT. GUTIER… 100-105-78100.000 54.63 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 7-ELEVEN - FUEL FOR UNIT 41 100-215-66100.000 97.12 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 100-111-65600.000 38.33 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 100-111-65600.000 20.66 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 100-111-65600.000 38.33 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-310-61400.000 20.59 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - BINDERS 100-310-61400.000 25.78 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - BLUE COLORED PAP… 100-310-61400.000 22.98 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 EL TAMALAZO - FOOD FOR EVE… 100-310-65100.000 37.44 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 RANCHO SAN MIGUEL - FOOD … 100-310-65100.000 14.69 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 HOME DEPOT - EVIDENCE ROOM 100-201-65900.000 37.77 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 ELECTRIC BARGAIN STORE - CO… 100-550-65700.000 318.02 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 100-201-95690.000 1,477.40 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 100-215-95690.000 2,796.46 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 100-320-95690.000 460.10 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 100-551-81500.000 460.10 6 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 9/24/2022 - 10/7/2022 10/7/2022 12:55:51 PM Page 3 of 17
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 100-601-95690.000 460.41 HR & ASSOCIATES, LLC 316319 10/07/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - AUGU… 100-22495 3,192.00 HR & ASSOCIATES, LLC 316319 10/07/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - AUGU… 100-22496 760.00 HR & ASSOCIATES, LLC 316319 10/07/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - AUGU… 100-22507 380.00 HR & ASSOCIATES, LLC 316319 10/07/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - AUGU… 100-22508 76.00 HR & ASSOCIATES, LLC 316319 10/07/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - AUGU… 100-22510 76.00 HR & ASSOCIATES, LLC 316319 10/07/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - AUGU… 100-22512 304.00 HR & ASSOCIATES, LLC 316319 10/07/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - AUGU… 100-22523 380.00 HR & ASSOCIATES, LLC 316319 10/07/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - AUGU… 100-22525 456.00 HR & ASSOCIATES, LLC 316319 10/07/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - AUGU… 100-22527 608.00 HR & ASSOCIATES, LLC 316319 10/07/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - AUGU… 100-22528 456.00 HR & ASSOCIATES, LLC 316319 10/07/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - AUGU… 100-22530 760.00 HR & ASSOCIATES, LLC 316319 10/07/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - AUGU… 100-22531 228.00 HR & ASSOCIATES, LLC 316319 10/07/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - AUGU… 100-22532 1,216.00 HR & ASSOCIATES, LLC 316319 10/07/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - AUGU… 100-22533 76.00 HR & ASSOCIATES, LLC 316319 10/07/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - AUGU… 100-22534 836.00 HR & ASSOCIATES, LLC 316319 10/07/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - AUGU… 100-601-63600.000 9,424.00 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 316327 10/07/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - AUGU… 100-22530 875.00 RINCON CONSULTANTS, INC 316336 10/07/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - AUGU… 100-22527 2,340.00 RINCON CONSULTANTS, INC 316336 10/07/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - AUGU… 100-22528 156.00 RINCON CONSULTANTS, INC 316336 10/07/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - AUGU… 100-601-63600.000 879.75 GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 316269 09/30/2022 COUPLING 100-550-65700.000 33.28 VERIZON 316304 09/30/2022 JULY - GPS SERVICES 100-110-64900.000 19.00 VERIZON 316304 09/30/2022 JULY - GPS SERVICES 100-215-64900.000 304.00 VERIZON 316304 09/30/2022 JULY - GPS SERVICES 100-310-64900.000 19.00 VERIZON 316304 09/30/2022 JULY - GPS SERVICES 100-320-64900.000 76.00 VERIZON 316304 09/30/2022 JULY - GPS SERVICES 100-550-64900.000 38.00 VERIZON 316304 09/30/2022 JULY - GPS SERVICES 100-551-64900.000 19.00 VERIZON 316304 09/30/2022 JULY - GPS SERVICES 100-601-64900.000 19.00 J.R. INTERPRETING SERVICES 316275 09/30/2022 TRANSLATION SERVICES - CITY … 100-101-63100.000 344.00 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 316278 09/30/2022 LEGAL SERVICES - FIRE 100-150-63100.000 166.50 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 316278 09/30/2022 LEGAL SERVICES - POLICE OFFIC… 100-150-63100.000 90.00 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 316270 09/30/2022 PLAS CUTTER TOOL 100-550-65700.000 10.90 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 316282 09/30/2022 7804 - SPRAY PAINT 100-320-66300.000 21.88 GRAINGER 316267 09/30/2022 CHAIN FOR ALL PARK'S SWINGS 100-550-65900.000 1,104.30 SIRCHIE ACQUISITION COMPAN…316289 09/30/2022 EVIDENCE SUPPPLIES FOR DOGL…100-215-65400.000 310.80 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 316283 09/30/2022 COMMUNITY PARK 100-550-64100.000 87.95 EAST BAY TIRE CO. 316262 09/30/2022 7901 - FOUR NEW TIRES 100-550-66200.000 522.66 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 316270 09/30/2022 SUPPLIES 100-201-65900.000 21.74 4LEAF, INC 316251 09/30/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - AUGU… 100-601-63600.000 38,613.75 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 316270 09/30/2022 SUPPLIES 100-201-65900.000 8.71 OFFICE DEPOT 316330 10/07/2022 COPY PAPER - CITY HALL 100-111-61200.000 183.89 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 316293 09/30/2022 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 100-111-65600.000 80.83 VALLEY TROPHIES & DETECTORS 316302 09/30/2022 DESK / PHOTO NAME PLATES - … 100-215-65100.000 41.52 AT&T 316309 10/07/2022 DOJ PD PHONE LINE 100-215-64500.000 467.64 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 316333 10/07/2022 CIVIC CENTER 100-111-64100.000 836.89 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 316333 10/07/2022 CIVIC CENTER 100-111-64200.000 192.07 SOUTH COUNTY TIRE 316291 09/30/2022 7901 - SPIN BALANCE 100-550-66200.000 50.00 36 NORTH PROPERTIES, INC. 316307 10/07/2022 ERAP RENT PMT - 109 8TH ST #… 100-105-68201.000 1,689.50 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 316270 09/30/2022 INSERTS FOR PD 100-111-65900.000 5.29 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 316331 10/07/2022 2303 - LUG NUT 100-111-66200.000 22.78 MONTEREY PENINSULA VETERI… 316280 09/30/2022 DOG EXAM AND MEDS 100-230-63400.000 273.24 MBS BUSINESS SYSTEMS 316324 10/07/2022 PD FRONT PRINTER 100-201-61200.000 152.47 MBS BUSINESS SYSTEMS 316324 10/07/2022 PD FRONT PRINTER 100-215-61200.000 152.46 MBS BUSINESS SYSTEMS 316324 10/07/2022 PD PATROL PRINTER 100-215-61200.000 242.85 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 316331 10/07/2022 2303 - LUG NUT 100-111-66200.000 11.39 NEW SV MEDIA, INC 316281 09/30/2022 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 100-170-67600.000 567.50 NEW SV MEDIA, INC 316281 09/30/2022 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 100-170-67600.000 445.00 GRAINGER 316315 10/07/2022 ANIMAL CONTROL KENNEL FLO… 100-230-65900.000 192.43 HYDRO TURF, INC. 316273 09/30/2022 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 100-550-65700.000 782.93 7 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 9/24/2022 - 10/7/2022 10/7/2022 12:55:51 PM Page 4 of 17
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount LARA'S PHOTO SHOP 316277 09/30/2022 STAFF PORTRAITS 100-215-65100.000 30.66 AMERICAN SUPPLY COMPANY 316308 10/07/2022 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 100-201-65600.000 86.51 CLARK PEST CONTROL 316258 09/30/2022 PEST CONTROL 100-111-65900.000 164.00 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 316257 09/30/2022 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 100-111-65200.000 5.15 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 316257 09/30/2022 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 100-111-65600.000 56.07 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 316257 09/30/2022 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 100-320-65200.000 46.76 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 316257 09/30/2022 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 100-550-65200.000 114.79 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 316283 09/30/2022 MONTHLY UTILITIES 100-550-64100.000 32.93 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 316283 09/30/2022 MONTHLY UTILITIES 100-551-64100.000 252.03 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 316283 09/30/2022 MONTHLY UTILITIES 100-551-64200.000 25.43 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 316283 09/30/2022 MONTHLY UTILITIES 100-590-64200.000 21.29 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 316283 09/30/2022 MONTHLY UTILITIES 100-590-64200.000 252.74 ALL SAFE INTEGRATED SYSTEMS 316252 09/30/2022 BURGLARY MONOTORING CO… 100-551-63900.000 75.00 RELIABLE TRANSLATIONS CORP 316285 09/30/2022 TRANSLATION SERVICES - AGE… 100-170-63100.000 76.64 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRICA… 316338 10/07/2022 FUEL 100-111-66100.000 88.61 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRICA… 316338 10/07/2022 FUEL 100-201-66100.000 443.06 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRICA… 316338 10/07/2022 FUEL 100-215-66100.000 88.61 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRICA… 316338 10/07/2022 FUEL 100-215-66100.000 5,582.45 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRICA… 316338 10/07/2022 FUEL 100-230-66100.000 88.61 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRICA… 316338 10/07/2022 FUEL 100-320-66100.000 177.23 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRICA… 316338 10/07/2022 FUEL 100-550-66100.000 177.23 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRICA… 316338 10/07/2022 FUEL 100-551-66100.221 88.61 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRICA… 316338 10/07/2022 FUEL 100-601-66100.000 88.61 VERIZON WIRELESS 316345 10/07/2022 CELLPHONES - PW 100-101-64600.000 190.05 VERIZON WIRELESS 316345 10/07/2022 CELLPHONES - PW 100-110-64600.000 51.76 VERIZON WIRELESS 316345 10/07/2022 CELLPHONES - PW 100-110-64600.000 51.76 VERIZON WIRELESS 316345 10/07/2022 CELLPHONES - PW 100-320-64600.000 38.78 VERIZON WIRELESS 316345 10/07/2022 CELLPHONES - PW 100-550-64600.000 38.78 VERIZON WIRELESS 316345 10/07/2022 CELLPHONES - PW 100-550-64600.000 123.91 VERIZON WIRELESS 316345 10/07/2022 CELLPHONES - PW 100-601-64600.000 103.52 JOSE SANCHEZ 316276 09/30/2022 MICHAEL'S - REC SERVICES SEN… 100-551-63500.000 83.03 JOSE SANCHEZ 316276 09/30/2022 DOLLAR GENERAL - REC SERVIC… 100-551-63500.000 15.20 JOSE SANCHEZ 316276 09/30/2022 AMAZON - REC SERVICES - MOV…100-551-63500.000 301.11 JOSE SANCHEZ 316276 09/30/2022 AMAZON - REC SERVICES - MOV…100-551-63500.000 43.37 JOSE SANCHEZ 316276 09/30/2022 AMAZON - OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-551-63500.000 42.19 JOSE SANCHEZ 316276 09/30/2022 AMAZON - REC SERVICES - PR… 100-551-63500.000 122.55 JOSE SANCHEZ 316276 09/30/2022 AMAZON - OFFICE SUPPLIES - C… 100-551-63500.000 135.75 JOSE SANCHEZ 316276 09/30/2022 AMAZON - JANITORIAL SUPPLIE… 100-551-63500.000 157.78 JOSE SANCHEZ 316276 09/30/2022 DOLLAR TREE - SENIOR PROGR… 100-551-63500.000 114.71 JOSE SANCHEZ 316276 09/30/2022 DOLLAR GENERAL - REC SERVIC… 100-551-63500.000 60.66 JOSE SANCHEZ 316276 09/30/2022 AMAZON - OFFICE SUPPLIES - D… 100-551-63500.000 65.69 JOSE SANCHEZ 316276 09/30/2022 AMAZON - JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 100-551-63500.000 109.49 JOSE SANCHEZ 316276 09/30/2022 DOLLAR GENERAL - VOLUNTEER…100-551-63500.000 109.90 JOSE SANCHEZ 316276 09/30/2022 AMAZON - REC SERVICES - SENI… 100-551-63500.000 114.08 JOSE SANCHEZ 316276 09/30/2022 AMAZON - OFFICE SUPPLIES - D… 100-551-63500.000 306.59 JOSE SANCHEZ 316276 09/30/2022 BIANCO - VAN & STORAGE - EQ… 100-551-63500.000 260.00 JOSE SANCHEZ 316276 09/30/2022 AMAZON - OFFICE SUPPLIES - C… 100-551-63500.000 120.38 JOSE SANCHEZ 316276 09/30/2022 AMAZON - REC SERVICES - BIKE …100-551-63500.000 217.36 JOSE SANCHEZ 316276 09/30/2022 AMAZON - JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 100-551-63500.000 114.18 JOSE SANCHEZ 316276 09/30/2022 TRUE VALUE - REC SERVICES - A… 100-551-63500.000 36.08 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 316317 10/07/2022 4" BRN VENT FOR CVC 100-111-65900.000 8.71 FIRST NIGHT MONTEREY, INC. 316265 09/30/2022 GREENFIELD HARVEST FESTIVAL…100-105-78100.000 15,000.00 FIRST NIGHT MONTEREY, INC. 316264 09/30/2022 GREENFIELD HARVEST FESTIVAL…100-105-78100.000 4,368.00 CALIFORNIA PREMIER RESTORA…316311 10/07/2022 TEMPORARY FENCE 137 6TH ST 100-12351 900.00 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 316317 10/07/2022 3742 - COUPLER 100-550-66300.000 18.56 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 316332 10/07/2022 ERAP UTILITY PMT - ACCT# 413… 100-105-68202.000 309.84 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 316327 10/07/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - JULY 2… 100-601-63600.000 1,000.00 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 316327 10/07/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - SEPTE… 100-601-63600.000 550.00 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 316327 10/07/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - OCTO… 100-601-63600.000 550.00 VALLEY TROPHIES & DETECTORS 316343 10/07/2022 DESK NAME PLATES - RAMIREZ … 100-201-65100.000 51.35 8 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 9/24/2022 - 10/7/2022 10/7/2022 12:55:51 PM Page 5 of 17
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount BENGARD REALTY 316254 09/30/2022 ERAP RENT PMT - 35 6TH ST G. … 100-105-68201.000 3,750.00 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 316312 10/07/2022 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 100-111-65200.000 5.15 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 316312 10/07/2022 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 100-111-65600.000 56.07 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 316312 10/07/2022 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 100-320-65200.000 46.76 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 316312 10/07/2022 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 100-550-65200.000 46.29 NEW SV MEDIA, INC 316281 09/30/2022 PUBLIC NOTICES 100-170-67600.000 975.00 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 316327 10/07/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - FEBRU…100-22495 3,350.00 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 316327 10/07/2022 CONSULTING SERVICES - MARC… 100-22495 525.00 UNITED WAY MONTEREY COUN…316300 09/30/2022 FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR 211 … 100-110-68200.000 5,000.00 1002 WALNUT AVE L.P. 316305 10/07/2022 ERAP RENT PMT - 1002 WALNU… 100-105-68201.000 1,982.00 36 NORTH PROPERTIES, INC. 316306 10/07/2022 ERAP UTILITY PMT - 109 8TH ST… 100-105-68202.000 172.87 TRI-CITIES DISPOSAL 316342 10/07/2022 DISPOSAL SERVICES FY 2022-20… 100-191-64400.000 120,413.86 SALINAS VALLEY SOLID WASTE … 316287 09/30/2022 WASTE SERVICES FY 22-23 100-191-64400.000 65,196.94 HARTNELL COLLEGE 316272 09/30/2022 WORKFORCE DEVELOP AG & H… 100-101-78100.000 7,070.83 SEIU Local 521 316250 09/30/2022 COPE - Union Dues 100-22420 10.00 SEIU Local 521 316250 09/30/2022 Union Dues 100-22420 200.36 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST C… DFT0005052 09/30/2022 Deferred Compensation Loan P… 100-22435 178.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST C… DFT0005054 09/30/2022 Defer Comp-GPSA 100-22430 1,127.31 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST C… DFT0005055 09/30/2022 Defer Comp-Management 100-22430 1,010.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST C… DFT0005056 09/30/2022 Defer Comp-Mid Management 100-22430 120.01 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST C… DFT0005057 09/30/2022 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 100-22430 525.00 G P O A 316247 09/30/2022 GPOA DUES 100-22410 320.00
STATE STREET BANK & TRUST C… DFT0005059 09/30/2022 Roth Retirement 100-22431 942.50 GREENFIELD POLICE SERGEANTS…316248 09/30/2022 GPSA DUES 100-22415 50.73 CITY OF GREENFIELD 316246 09/30/2022 Weapon Repay 100-22481 151.10 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0005060 09/30/2022 SDI 100-22225 983.62 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005061 09/30/2022 Medicare 100-22215 2,904.33 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005062 09/30/2022 Social Security 100-22215 11,198.40 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0005063 09/30/2022 State Withholding 100-22220 3,488.98 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005064 09/30/2022 Federal Tax Withholding 100-22210 9,671.10 TERRACINA OAKS II APARTMEN… 316340 10/07/2022 ERAP RENT PMT - 1276 OAK AV… 100-105-68201.000 2,847.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 316345 10/07/2022 CELLPHONES - PD 100-201-64600.000 127.12 VERIZON WIRELESS 316345 10/07/2022 CELLPHONES - PD 100-215-64600.000 1,045.20 VERIZON WIRELESS 316345 10/07/2022 CELLPHONES - PD 100-230-64600.000 120.07 Fund 100 - GENERAL FUND Total: 387,692.27
Fund: 102 - Fire General
ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 102-250-95690.000 547.54 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 102-250-95690.000 547.12 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 DMV - REGISTRATION 102-250-65100.000 23.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 DMV - REGISTRATION FEE 102-250-65100.000 0.49 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 SAMBROWNSHIELDS - RECRUI… 102-250-65200.000 56.50 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 SYMBOLARTS - BADGE & UNIF… 102-250-65200.000 162.36 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 HOME DEPOT - SOIL SCOOP 102-250-65400.000 21.70 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - CELLPHONE CASES 102-250-65100.000 43.78 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 WINNERS AWARDS - PAR TAGS 102-250-65200.000 46.98 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 MONTEREY SIGNS - HELMET LE… 102-250-65200.000 65.55 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 316270 09/30/2022 SUPPLIES 102-250-66300.000 9.54 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 316270 09/30/2022 HARDWARE SUPPLIES 102-250-66300.000 9.99 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 102-250-95690.000 547.12 GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 316269 09/30/2022 RESPIRATOR WIPE 102-250-65400.000 60.25 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 316283 09/30/2022 FIRE DEPT 102-250-64100.000 1,230.83 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 316283 09/30/2022 FIRE DEPT 102-250-64200.000 78.76 GREEN'S ACCOUNTING 316318 10/07/2022 MONTEREY COUNTY ASSESSOR 102-250-63900.000 2,040.00 L.N. CURTIS & SONS 316323 10/07/2022 STRUCTURE BOOTS & FIRE SUP… 102-250-65200.000 499.24 L.N. CURTIS & SONS 316323 10/07/2022 STRUCTURE BOOTS & FIRE SUP… 102-250-65400.000 698.53 GOLDEN STATE TRUCK & TRAIL… 316266 09/30/2022 2020 PIERCE SABER SERVICE CA…102-250-66200.000 1,207.39 QUALITY WATER ENTERPRISES … 316335 10/07/2022 BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUPP… 102-250-65900.000 35.00 MCKESSON MEDICAL-SURGICAL…316325 10/07/2022 FIREFIGHTER SUPPLIES 102-250-65400.000 105.55 TRI-COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION 316298 09/30/2022 FIRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICE 102-250-63900.000 168.21 TARGET PEST CONTROL 316295 09/30/2022 PEST CONTROL 102-250-63900.000 95.00 9 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 9/24/2022 - 10/7/2022 10/7/2022 12:55:51 PM Page 6 of 17
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRICA… 316338 10/07/2022 FUEL 102-250-66100.000 88.61 VERIZON WIRELESS 316345 10/07/2022 CELLPHONES - PW 102-250-64600.000 334.19 SHARPS SOLUTIONS, LLC 316288 09/30/2022 WASTE DISPOSAL 102-250-64400.000 200.00 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 316326 10/07/2022 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 102-250-65600.000 41.83 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST C… DFT0005051 09/30/2022 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 102-22430 213.41 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST C… DFT0005057 09/30/2022 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 102-22430 205.00 Greenfield Professional Firefigh… 316249 09/30/2022 Fire Union Dues 102-22410 280.00 DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVI… DFT0005058 09/30/2022 Misc Withholding 102-22450 471.68 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0005060 09/30/2022 SDI 102-22225 667.07 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005061 09/30/2022 Medicare 102-22215 1,998.66 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005062 09/30/2022 Social Security 102-22215 752.66 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0005063 09/30/2022 State Withholding 102-22220 3,070.39 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005064 09/30/2022 Federal Tax Withholding 102-22210 8,341.00 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0005066 10/05/2022 SDI 102-22225 103.14 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005067 10/05/2022 Medicare 102-22215 271.88 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005068 10/05/2022 Social Security 102-22215 1,162.56 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0005069 10/05/2022 State Withholding 102-22220 36.93 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005070 10/05/2022 Federal Tax Withholding 102-22210 43.41 Fund 102 - Fire General Total: 26,582.85
Fund: 220 - Supplemental Transactions & Use Tax Fund (V & W) ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 220-215-95690.000 582.68 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 220-215-95690.000 582.23 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 DELL - TABLET FOR PD 220-215-71400.000 2,475.64 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 220-215-95690.000 582.23 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 316282 09/30/2022 7343 - WIPER BLADE 220-215-65000.000 43.78 DAN'S TIRE & AUTO SERV 316259 09/30/2022 7302 - ALIGNMENT 220-215-66200.000 89.95 GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 316269 09/30/2022 7340 - POLY TUBING LDPE 220-215-65000.000 2.37 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 316282 09/30/2022 7430 - OIL / MOTOR OIL 220-215-65000.000 58.93 NAPA AUTO PARTS 316328 10/07/2022 7335 - BATTERY 220-215-65000.000 186.47 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST C… DFT0005053 09/30/2022 Defer Comp-GPOA 220-22430 515.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST C… DFT0005054 09/30/2022 Defer Comp-GPSA 220-22430 942.69 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST C… DFT0005057 09/30/2022 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 220-22430 150.00 Greenfield Professional Firefigh… 316249 09/30/2022 Fire Union Dues 220-22410 35.00 DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVI… DFT0005058 09/30/2022 Misc Withholding 220-22450 1,236.31 G P O A 316247 09/30/2022 GPOA DUES 220-22410 640.00
GREENFIELD POLICE SERGEANTS…316248 09/30/2022 GPSA DUES 220-22415 149.27 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0005060 09/30/2022 SDI 220-22225 755.89 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005061 09/30/2022 Medicare 220-22215 2,323.16 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005062 09/30/2022 Social Security 220-22215 7,991.90 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0005063 09/30/2022 State Withholding 220-22220 3,578.64 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005064 09/30/2022 Federal Tax Withholding 220-22210 7,979.03 VERIZON WIRELESS 316345 10/07/2022 CELLPHONES - PD 220-605-64600.000 151.59 Fund 220 - Supplemental Transactions & Use Tax Fund (V & W) Total: 31,052.76 Fund: 230 - GAS TAX FUND
GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 316270 09/30/2022 PLAS CUTTER TOOL 230-320-65700.000 10.89 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 316270 09/30/2022 DRAIN SPADE 230-320-65700.000 40.46 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 316283 09/30/2022 STREET LIGHTS HIGH SCHOOL 230-320-64100.000 310.92 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 316270 09/30/2022 MASONARY BIT SET 230-320-65700.000 24.04 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 316283 09/30/2022 MONTHLY UTILITIES 230-320-64100.000 147.54 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 316317 10/07/2022 3/8" HOLE MANDREL ARBOR 230-320-65700.000 24.08 KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY 316322 10/07/2022 GASKET 230-320-65700.000 67.17 Fund 230 - GAS TAX FUND Total: 625.10
Fund: 263 - LLM #1 - LEXINGTON
ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 263-360-81500.000 230.39 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 263-360-81500.000 230.21 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 263-360-81500.000 230.21 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 316283 09/30/2022 LLMD MARIPOSA 263-360-64100.000 112.04 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 316283 09/30/2022 VINTAGE MEADOWS PHASE 1 263-360-64100.000 186.68 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAPI… 316290 09/30/2022 LEXINGTON SQUARE SUBDIVISI… 263-360-63700.000 1,670.00 10 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 9/24/2022 - 10/7/2022 10/7/2022 12:55:51 PM Page 7 of 17
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAPI… 316290 09/30/2022 MARIPOSA PLACE 263-360-63700.000 695.00 SEIU Local 521 316250 09/30/2022 Union Dues 263-22420 3.96 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0005060 09/30/2022 SDI 263-22225 6.69 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005061 09/30/2022 Medicare 263-22215 17.70 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005062 09/30/2022 Social Security 263-22215 75.70 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0005063 09/30/2022 State Withholding 263-22220 6.10 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005064 09/30/2022 Federal Tax Withholding 263-22210 28.29 Fund 263 - LLM #1 - LEXINGTON Total: 3,492.97
Fund: 264 - LLM #2 - TERRA VERDE, ETC
ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 264-360-81500.000 230.38 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 264-360-81500.000 230.20 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 BRITE SIDE LANDSCAPES - LIGHT…264-360-63600.000 444.31 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST DFT0005071 10/07/2022 VEHICLES MONTHLY LEASE FEE … 264-360-81500.000 230.20 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 316283 09/30/2022 LLMD LAS MANZANITAS 264-360-64100.000 48.16 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAPI… 316290 09/30/2022 LA VINA SUBDIVISION 264-360-63700.000 3,435.00 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAPI… 316290 09/30/2022 BAROLO PARK 264-360-63700.000 210.00 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAPI… 316290 09/30/2022 TRADITIONS SUBDIVISION 264-360-63700.000 3,125.00 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAPI… 316290 09/30/2022 ST CHARLES STREETSCAPE AND …264-360-63700.000 2,555.00 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAPI… 316290 09/30/2022 TERRA VERDE SUBDIVISION 264-360-63700.000 1,685.00 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAPI… 316290 09/30/2022 ST CHARLES GAZEBO 264-360-63700.000 1,115.00 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAPI… 316290 09/30/2022 ST CHRISTOPHER PARK 264-360-63700.000 1,090.00 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 316283 09/30/2022 MONTHLY UTILITIES 264-360-64100.000 537.69 SEIU Local 521 316250 09/30/2022 Union Dues 264-22420 3.96 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0005060 09/30/2022 SDI 264-22225 8.45 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005061 09/30/2022 Medicare 264-22215 22.34 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005062 09/30/2022 Social Security 264-22215 95.56 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0005063 09/30/2022 State Withholding 264-22220 7.11 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005064 09/30/2022 Federal Tax Withholding 264-22210 33.43 Fund 264 - LLM #2 - TERRA VERDE, ETC Total: 15,106.79
Fund: 265 - SMD #1
SEIU Local 521 316250 09/30/2022 Union Dues 265-22420 3.96 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0005060 09/30/2022 SDI 265-22225 6.69 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005061 09/30/2022 Medicare 265-22215 17.70 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005062 09/30/2022 Social Security 265-22215 75.70 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0005063 09/30/2022 State Withholding 265-22220 6.10 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005064 09/30/2022 Federal Tax Withholding 265-22210 28.29 Fund 265 - SMD #1 Total: 138.44
Fund: 266 - SMD #2
SEIU Local 521 316250 09/30/2022 Union Dues 266-22420 3.95 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0005060 09/30/2022 SDI 266-22225 6.75 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005061 09/30/2022 Medicare 266-22215 17.64 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005062 09/30/2022 Social Security 266-22215 75.24 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0005063 09/30/2022 State Withholding 266-22220 6.09 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005064 09/30/2022 Federal Tax Withholding 266-22210 28.18 Fund 266 - SMD #2 Total: 137.85
Fund: 297 - GREENFIELD SCIENCE WORKSHOP
U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - MAGNIFYING LENSES…297-597-65500.000 25.17 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE - PAI… 297-597-65500.000 9.80 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - BUZZERS - SUMMER …297-597-65500.000 7.64 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - KITCHEN SUPPLIES -… 297-597-65500.000 6.52 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 COSTCO - BROKEN CANOPY - RE…297-597-65500.000 -169.72 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 FASTRIP - STAFF MEETING - LU… 297-597-65500.000 14.74 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - FAKE SECURITY CAM…297-597-65500.000 14.22 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - SCIENCE MOBILE EX… 297-597-65500.000 13.38 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 GOOGLE - PHOTO STORAGE 297-597-65500.000 19.99 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - SCIENCE MOBILE EX… 297-597-65500.000 16.41 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - SCIENCE MOBILE EX… 297-597-65500.000 29.98 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 COSTCO - STORAGE SHELVES / … 297-597-65500.000 518.64 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 SQ MOBILE - COMPUTER REPAIR…297-597-65500.000 204.16 11 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 9/24/2022 - 10/7/2022 10/7/2022 12:55:51 PM Page 8 of 17
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 SMART & FINAL - DRINKING CU… 297-597-65500.000 83.51 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 LUIGI'S - FALL STAFF TRAINING 297-597-65500.000 83.98 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 O'REILLY - SCIENCE MOBILE - B… 297-597-65500.000 107.86 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - BREAK ROOM - COF… 297-597-65500.000 15.21 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - PLASTIC MIRROR - F… 297-597-65500.000 63.48 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - PRIZE WHEEL - PRO… 297-597-65500.000 64.93 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 CALIFORNIA GOURMET PIZZA - … 297-597-65500.000 65.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - FILTER FOR DRINKIN… 297-597-65500.000 71.18 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - SCIENCE MOBILE EX… 297-597-65500.000 10.94 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 JAMECO - SCIENCE MOBILE WO…297-597-65500.000 32.32 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 KELLY MOORE PAINTS - BUILDI… 297-597-65500.000 58.60 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 KELVIN ELECTRONICS - ELECTRIC…297-597-65500.000 145.50 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 PETSMART - PET FOOD 297-597-65500.000 49.13 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - BIKE PARTS - BIKE R… 297-597-69100.000 153.16 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - BIKE PARTS - BIKE R… 297-597-69100.000 17.50 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 WALMART - BIKE PARTS - BIKE … 297-597-69100.000 82.07 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - BIKE TOOLS - BIKE R… 297-597-69100.000 54.72 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 WALMART - BIKE PARTS - BIKE … 297-597-69100.000 57.99 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - BIKE TOOLS - BIKE R… 297-597-69100.000 21.80 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - BIKE PARTS - BIKE R… 297-597-69100.000 110.40 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - BIKE PARTS - BIKE R… 297-597-69100.000 22.92 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 WALMART - BIKE PARTS - BIKE … 297-597-69100.000 206.52 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 COSTCO - BIKE REPAIR WORKS… 297-597-69100.000 175.19 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 WALMART - BIKE PARTS - BIKE … 297-597-69100.000 164.13 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - BIKE TOOLS - BIKE R… 297-597-69100.000 14.65 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 WALMART - BIKE PARTS - BIKE … 297-597-69100.000 125.49 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - WHALE WATCHING … 297-598-65100.206 37.89 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 RANCHO SAN MIGUEL - WHALE… 297-598-65100.206 6.98 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 SUBWAY - WHALE WATCHING … 297-598-65100.206 49.70 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 SAFEWAY - WHALE WATCHING … 297-598-65100.206 49.55 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - WHALE WATCHING … 297-598-65100.206 16.05 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - WHAKE WATCHING … 297-598-65100.206 12.49 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 SUBWAY - WHALE WATCHING … 297-598-65100.206 65.33 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 REI.COM - PROFESSIONAL DEVE…297-598-65100.209 72.19 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - MAP - OUTDOOR E… 297-598-65100.209 13.08 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - MAP - OUTDOOR E… 297-598-65100.209 16.17 VERIZON 316304 09/30/2022 JULY - GPS SERVICES 297-597-64900.000 95.00 DAN'S TIRE & AUTO SERV 316259 09/30/2022 7202 - FLAT TIRE REPAIR 297-597-66200.000 32.00 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 316283 09/30/2022 MONTHLY UTILITIES 297-597-64100.000 665.05 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 316283 09/30/2022 MONTHLY UTILITIES 297-597-64200.000 16.67 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRICA… 316338 10/07/2022 FUEL 297-597-66100.000 443.06 VERIZON WIRELESS 316345 10/07/2022 CELLPHONES - PW 297-597-64900.000 103.52 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST C… DFT0005055 09/30/2022 Defer Comp-Management 297-22430 693.94 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0005060 09/30/2022 SDI 297-22225 145.91 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005061 09/30/2022 Medicare 297-22215 384.74 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005062 09/30/2022 Social Security 297-22215 1,645.04 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0005063 09/30/2022 State Withholding 297-22220 345.72 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005064 09/30/2022 Federal Tax Withholding 297-22210 974.60 Fund 297 - GREENFIELD SCIENCE WORKSHOP Total: 8,653.79
Fund: 380 - VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
DRIVE CUSTOMS 316261 09/30/2022 PD UNIT 48 NEW VEHICLE UPLI… 380-390-81530.000 15,963.38 DRIVE CUSTOMS 316261 09/30/2022 PD UNIT 49 UPFITTING 380-390-81530.000 15,775.50 Fund 380 - VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT Total: 31,738.88 Fund: 385 - INTERNAL SERVICE
STANDARD INSURANCE COM 316292 09/30/2022 INSURANCE FY 2022-2023 385-180-52530.000 2,104.54 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 RANCHO SAN MIGUEL - RECRUI… 385-160-68100.000 32.87 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 FASTRIP - RECRUITMENT 385-160-68100.000 13.12 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 STARBUCKS - RECRUITMENT 385-160-68100.000 40.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 RANCHO SAN MIGUEL - RECRUI… 385-160-68100.000 185.06 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 TACOS EL GRULLENSE - RECRUI… 385-160-68100.000 219.00 12 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 9/24/2022 - 10/7/2022 10/7/2022 12:55:51 PM Page 9 of 17
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - TEMPERED GLASS C… 385-160-61400.000 -114.96 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 VISTAPRINT - BUSINESS CARDS -…385-160-61400.000 33.93 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - OFFICE SUPPLIES 385-160-61400.000 8.95 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 PLAZA BAKERY - BIRTHDAYS 385-160-65100.000 71.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 EASYKEYSCOM - FIREKING LOCK…385-160-65100.000 19.43 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 COSTCO - BIRTHDAYS 385-160-65100.000 251.69 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 HOTEL PACIFIC - M. AGUAYO 385-160-67100.000 537.78 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 SANTA LUCIA BAKERY - PW INT… 385-160-68100.000 16.50 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 LAW ENFORCEMENT PSYCHOL… 385-160-68100.000 900.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - PW INK 385-125-61400.000 407.35 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - PUBLIC WORKS INK 385-125-61400.000 368.53 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - FINANCE INK 385-125-61400.000 383.25 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - PW INK 385-125-61400.000 372.29 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 UATTEND - TIME CLOCKS MAN… 385-125-61700.000 142.35 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 ADOBE - PD ADOBE LICENSE 385-125-61700.000 16.99 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 BARRACUDA - EMAIL BACKUP 385-125-61700.000 198.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AT&T - PW YARD INTERNET 385-125-61700.000 69.55 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 T-MOBILE - CODE BLUE DATA 385-125-61700.000 40.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 RAZZOLINK - SCADA INTERNET 385-125-61700.000 39.95 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 GOOGLE - TELEPROMP LICENSE 385-125-61700.000 34.99 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 ADOBE - PD ADOBE ACROBAT P… 385-125-61700.000 16.99 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 ZOOM - ZOOM LICENSE 385-125-61700.000 128.72 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 ADOBE - ADOBE SUITE 385-125-61700.000 52.99 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 ADOBE - HR ADOBE ACROBAT P…385-125-61700.000 239.88 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 RAZZOLINK - WASTE WATER PL… 385-125-61700.000 115.23 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 UATTEND - TIME CLOCKS MAN… 385-125-61700.000 142.35 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - B&P TABLET 385-125-65300.000 113.87 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - RAM FOR GABRIEL … 385-125-65300.000 108.41 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - BATTERY BACKUP 385-125-65300.000 107.72 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - PW DIRECTOR PRIN… 385-125-65300.000 569.38 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - BACKUP BATTERY 385-125-65300.000 98.54 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - CABLES 385-125-65300.000 234.35 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - MICROPHONES 385-125-65300.000 418.96 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - WIFI SYSTEM FOR A… 385-125-65300.000 197.09 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - TOOLS 385-125-65300.000 245.68 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - CAMERA 385-125-65300.000 164.24 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - NAS FOR PD 385-125-65300.000 1,642.06 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - SECURITY CAMERAS 385-125-65300.000 1,094.97 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - SECURITY CAMERAS 385-125-65300.000 865.05 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - TOOLS 385-125-65300.000 388.64 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - TOOLS / CSW TV 385-125-65300.000 561.13 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - MONITOR 385-125-65300.000 421.56 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - CABLES 385-125-65300.000 56.93 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - TOOLS 385-125-65300.000 65.98 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - B&P WEBCAM 385-125-65300.000 66.35 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - TOOLS / CSW TV 385-125-65300.000 24.58 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - TOOLS 385-125-65300.000 33.82 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - CABLES 385-125-65300.000 35.04 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - HARD DRIVES - REF… 385-125-65300.000 -2,448.46 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - TOOLS 385-125-65300.000 6.57 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - CABLES 385-125-65300.000 53.43 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - SERVER BATTERY 385-125-65300.000 21.85 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 SHELL - PROPANE FOR FORKLIF… 385-311-65700.000 62.92 SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS, INC. 316286 09/30/2022 PARTS WASHER SOLVENT 385-311-65700.000 324.12 AT&T 316253 09/30/2022 CIVIC CENTER INTERNET 385-125-61700.000 888.13 VERIZON 316304 09/30/2022 JULY - GPS SERVICES 385-311-64900.000 19.00 TPX COMMUNICATIONS 316297 09/30/2022 PHONE SERVICE 385-125-61700.000 2,448.72 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 316282 09/30/2022 7923 - FUSE 385-311-66300.000 7.65 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 316293 09/30/2022 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 385-311-65600.000 203.70 STANDARD INSURANCE COM 316292 09/30/2022 INSURANCE FY 2022-2023 385-180-52530.000 2,482.19 13 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 9/24/2022 - 10/7/2022 10/7/2022 12:55:51 PM Page 10 of 17
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount AT&T 316310 10/07/2022 CSW INTERNET 385-125-61700.000 69.55 DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBST… 316260 09/30/2022 HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST …385-311-65800.000 7.50 CARDLOCK VENDING, INC. 316255 09/30/2022 CARD MASTER ANNUAL SERVICE…385-311-66300.000 235.00 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 316257 09/30/2022 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 385-311-65200.000 5.88 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 316257 09/30/2022 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 385-311-65600.000 29.60 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 316331 10/07/2022 WD-40 385-311-65700.000 32.84 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRICA… 316338 10/07/2022 FUEL 385-311-66100.000 265.84 VERIZON WIRELESS 316345 10/07/2022 CELLPHONES - PW 385-125-64600.000 51.76 VERIZON WIRELESS 316345 10/07/2022 CELLPHONES - PW 385-160-64600.000 51.60 VERIZON WIRELESS 316345 10/07/2022 CELLPHONES - PW 385-311-64600.000 40.89 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 316293 09/30/2022 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 385-311-65600.000 110.52 HARDEE POLYGRAPH SERVICES 316271 09/30/2022 PRE-EMPLOYMENT POLY SERV -…385-160-68100.000 600.00 T-MOBILE 316341 10/07/2022 CIVIC CENTER INTERNET 385-125-61700.000 32.56 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 316312 10/07/2022 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 385-311-65200.000 5.88 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 316312 10/07/2022 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 385-311-65600.000 29.60 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST C… DFT0005055 09/30/2022 Defer Comp-Management 385-22430 50.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST C… DFT0005056 09/30/2022 Defer Comp-Mid Management 385-22430 49.99 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST C… DFT0005057 09/30/2022 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 385-22430 60.00 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0005060 09/30/2022 SDI 385-22225 99.77 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005061 09/30/2022 Medicare 385-22215 263.02 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005062 09/30/2022 Social Security 385-22215 1,124.64 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0005063 09/30/2022 State Withholding 385-22220 476.19 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005064 09/30/2022 Federal Tax Withholding 385-22210 1,257.09 ANTHEM - BLUE CROSS DFT0005065 09/30/2022 INSURANCE FY 2022-2023 385-180-52510.000 86,636.03 SHRED-IT USA 316337 10/07/2022 SHREDDING SERVICES - CDD/ H… 385-160-63900.000 164.43 JESUS EDUARDO ESPINOSA 316321 10/07/2022 PER DIEM/MILEAGE REIMB - ST… 385-125-67200.000 112.76 Fund 385 - INTERNAL SERVICE Total: 110,535.43
Fund: 390 - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
PIINI REALTY INC. 316334 10/07/2022 PROFESIONAL APPRAISAL SERVI…390-390-89141.000 5,000.00 Fund 390 - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Total: 5,000.00
Fund: 503 - SEWER FUND
DAN'S TIRE & AUTO SERV 316259 09/30/2022 7914 - FLAT TIRE REPAIR 503-333-66300.000 35.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 SUR-SEAL - WWTP PUMP #3 PA… 503-335-65700.000 399.90 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES - FLIGHT …503-330-67200.000 60.20 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 CASQA - CONFERENCE 503-330-67200.000 180.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 AMAZON - HOUR METER FOR … 503-335-65700.000 156.32 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 NSC NORTHEN SAFETY CO - SEN…503-335-66400.000 355.11 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 RDO EQUIPMENT CO - 7730 - HY…503-335-66400.000 72.59 Regional Government Services 316284 09/30/2022 PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT ADVIS… 503-335-63700.000 5,235.45 XIO, INC. 316346 10/07/2022 CLOUD BASE MONITORING AND…503-333-61700.000 1,023.00 INDUSTRIAL PUMP SHOP, INC. 316274 09/30/2022 INSPECTION/REPAIR OF PUMP … 503-335-66400.000 6,459.95 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 316282 09/30/2022 7730 - BRAKE CLEANER 503-335-66200.000 48.15 GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 316269 09/30/2022 3/4" GALVANIZE TEE / NIPPLE 503-335-65700.000 13.38 VERIZON 316304 09/30/2022 JULY - GPS SERVICES 503-330-64900.000 57.00 SOUTH COUNTY TIRE 316291 09/30/2022 7522 - ASSEBLY TIRE WHEEL 503-333-66300.000 175.86 GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 316269 09/30/2022 STRAINER FOOT 503-335-65700.000 50.51 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 316293 09/30/2022 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 503-335-65600.000 146.32 FLUID RESOURCE MANAGEME… 316314 10/07/2022 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PL… 503-335-63900.000 33,967.99 GREEN LINE AND TOM'S SEPTIC… 316268 09/30/2022 EMERGENCY CALL-VACUM OUT…503-333-63800.000 2,136.25 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES 316299 09/30/2022 UTILITY BILLING ONLINE COMP… 503-191-63300.000 37.50 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 316333 10/07/2022 WASTEWATER TREAMENT PLA… 503-335-64100.000 4,072.48 MONTEREY BAY ANALYTICAL SE…316279 09/30/2022 WATER AND SEWER SAMPLES F…503-335-63800.000 893.25 VEGETABLE GROWERS SUPPLY 316303 09/30/2022 GLOVES 503-335-65600.000 104.88 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 316257 09/30/2022 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 503-333-65200.000 69.72 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 316283 09/30/2022 MONTHLY UTILITIES 503-333-64100.000 594.02 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 316283 09/30/2022 MONTHLY UTILITIES 503-335-64100.000 430.69 NICK'S GARAGE 316329 10/07/2022 7918 - DIAGNOSE / CANISTER R… 503-335-66200.000 289.50 NAPA AUTO PARTS 316328 10/07/2022 7735 - PARTS 503-335-66200.000 94.06 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRICA… 316338 10/07/2022 FUEL 503-330-66100.000 620.28 VERIZON WIRELESS 316345 10/07/2022 CELLPHONES - PW 503-330-64600.000 72.60 14 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 9/24/2022 - 10/7/2022 10/7/2022 12:55:51 PM Page 11 of 17
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount CSC of King City 316313 10/07/2022 7735 - FLANGE SEAL 503-335-66200.000 10.53 SWIFT TECTONICS, INC. 316294 09/30/2022 WWTP - PONDS MAINTENANCE 503-335-63800.000 14,880.00 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 316317 10/07/2022 RATCH TIEDOWN 503-335-65700.000 27.32 JAIME MARTINEZ 316320 10/07/2022 BOOTS REIMBURSEMENT FY 22… 503-335-65200.000 169.33 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 316312 10/07/2022 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 503-333-65200.000 55.72 SEIU Local 521 316250 09/30/2022 Union Dues 503-22420 153.76 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST C… DFT0005055 09/30/2022 Defer Comp-Management 503-22430 70.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST C… DFT0005056 09/30/2022 Defer Comp-Mid Management 503-22430 52.49 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST C… DFT0005057 09/30/2022 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 503-22430 92.70 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0005060 09/30/2022 SDI 503-22225 272.63 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005061 09/30/2022 Medicare 503-22215 718.60 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005062 09/30/2022 Social Security 503-22215 3,072.10 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0005063 09/30/2022 State Withholding 503-22220 308.64 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005064 09/30/2022 Federal Tax Withholding 503-22210 1,033.81 Fund 503 - SEWER FUND Total: 78,769.59
Fund: 504 - WATER FUND
U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 HOME DEPOT - SUPPLIES FOR … 504-345-65700.000 14.79 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 HOME DEPOT - BUCKETS 504-345-65700.000 32.50 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES - FLIGHT …504-345-67200.000 60.16 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 CASQA - CONFERENCE 504-345-67200.000 180.00 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 USPS - MAIL OUT GAS MONITOR…504-340-61100.000 16.10 U.S. BANK 316347 10/07/2022 DETAIL BURGOS - 7912 FUEL 504-340-66100.000 100.00 XIO, INC. 316346 10/07/2022 CLOUD BASE MONITORING AND…504-345-61700.000 1,023.00 TODD GROUNDWATER 316296 09/30/2022 ARROYO SECO GSA- GSP 504-12392 614.37 TODD GROUNDWATER 316296 09/30/2022 ARROYO SECO GSA- GSP 504-390-86205.000 614.38 GRAINGER 316267 09/30/2022 FULL BODY HARNESS 504-345-65700.000 235.47 GRAINGER 316267 09/30/2022 TWO LAND YARDS AND TWO E… 504-345-65700.000 822.87 GRAINGER 316267 09/30/2022 FULL BODY HARNESS 504-345-65700.000 252.58 VERIZON 316304 09/30/2022 JULY - GPS SERVICES 504-340-64900.000 76.00 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. 7… 316263 09/30/2022 HYDRANT GASKET 504-345-65700.000 39.33 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 316270 09/30/2022 DEADBOLT 504-345-65700.000 25.13 FLUID RESOURCE MANAGEME… 316314 10/07/2022 WATER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT…504-345-63900.000 14,218.31 UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA, INC. 316301 09/30/2022 SODIO HYPOCHLORITE FY/22-23…504-345-65700.000 6,899.38 GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 316316 10/07/2022 RAIN GEAR FOR R. GOMEZ 504-345-65200.000 203.02 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES 316299 09/30/2022 UTILITY BILLING ONLINE COMP… 504-191-63300.000 37.50 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 316333 10/07/2022 10TH STREET WELL 504-345-64100.000 3,080.34 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 316333 10/07/2022 13TH / OAK WELL 504-345-64100.000 783.82 MONTEREY BAY ANALYTICAL SE…316279 09/30/2022 WATER AND SEWER SAMPLES F…504-345-63800.000 694.75 SWRCB 316339 10/07/2022 WATER SYSTEM ENFORCEMENT…504-340-65800.000 205.00 VEGETABLE GROWERS SUPPLY 316344 10/07/2022 GLOVES 504-345-65700.000 104.88 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 316257 09/30/2022 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 504-345-65200.000 60.37 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 316283 09/30/2022 MONTHLY UTILITIES 504-345-64100.000 58.00 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRICA… 316338 10/07/2022 FUEL 504-340-66100.000 620.28 VERIZON WIRELESS 316345 10/07/2022 CELLPHONES - PW 504-340-64600.000 72.60 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 316312 10/07/2022 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 504-345-65200.000 60.37 CASEY PRINTING 316256 09/30/2022 UTILITY BILLS FY 22-23 504-340-61200.000 1,398.69 SEIU Local 521 316250 09/30/2022 Union Dues 504-22420 192.11 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST C… DFT0005055 09/30/2022 Defer Comp-Management 504-22430 70.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST C… DFT0005056 09/30/2022 Defer Comp-Mid Management 504-22430 52.51 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST C… DFT0005057 09/30/2022 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 504-22430 112.30 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0005060 09/30/2022 SDI 504-22225 298.95 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005061 09/30/2022 Medicare 504-22215 788.24 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005062 09/30/2022 Social Security 504-22215 3,370.92 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0005063 09/30/2022 State Withholding 504-22220 497.28 Internal Revenue Service DFT0005064 09/30/2022 Federal Tax Withholding 504-22210 1,502.06 Fund 504 - WATER FUND Total: 39,488.36
Grand Total: 739,015.08
15 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 9/24/2022 - 10/7/2022 10/7/2022 12:55:51 PM Page 12 of 17
Report Summary
Fund Summary
Fund Payment Amount
100 - GENERAL FUND 387,692.27
102 - Fire General 26,582.85
220 - Supplemental Transactions & Use Tax Fund (V & W) 31,052.76 230 - GAS TAX FUND 625.10
263 - LLM #1 - LEXINGTON 3,492.97
264 - LLM #2 - TERRA VERDE, ETC 15,106.79
265 - SMD #1 138.44
266 - SMD #2 137.85
297 - GREENFIELD SCIENCE WORKSHOP 8,653.79
380 - VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 31,738.88
385 - INTERNAL SERVICE 110,535.43
390 - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 5,000.00
503 - SEWER FUND 78,769.59
504 - WATER FUND 39,488.36
Grand Total: 739,015.08
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Payment Amount
100-101-63100.000 Administration Services 344.00
100-101-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 190.05
100-101-68200.000 Community Outreach 875.03
100-101-78100.000 General Community Fund… 7,070.83
100-105-68201.000 Rent Assistance 10,268.50
100-105-68202.000 Utility Assistance 482.71
100-105-78100.000 Community Events 20,769.41
100-110-63900.000 General Services 103.00
100-110-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 103.52
100-110-64900.000 Other Utilities 19.00
100-110-67200.000 Other Training 420.00
100-110-68200.000 Community Outreach 5,000.00
100-111-61200.000 Printing and Copying 183.89
100-111-64100.000 Electricity 836.89
100-111-64200.000 Gas Utility 192.07
100-111-65200.000 Uniforms / Personnel Equ… 10.30
100-111-65600.000 Janitorial Supplies 290.29
100-111-65900.000 Building Maintenance Su… 178.00
100-111-66100.000 Gasoline & Oil 88.61
100-111-66200.000 Vehicle and Equipment M… 34.17
100-12351 Accounts Receivable - Co… 1,928.12
100-150-63100.000 Administration Services 256.50
100-170-63100.000 Administration Services 76.64
100-170-67600.000 Publications 1,987.50
100-190-61400.000 Office Supplies 195.06
100-191-64400.000 Waste Disposal 185,610.80
100-201-61200.000 Printing and Copying 152.47
100-201-63900.000 General Services 100.99
100-201-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 127.12
100-201-65100.000 General Operating Suppli… 170.50
100-201-65600.000 Janitorial Supplies 101.83
100-201-65900.000 Building Maintenance Su… 121.73
100-201-66100.000 Gasoline & Oil 443.06
100-201-68200.000 Community Outreach 492.71
100-201-95690.000 Vehicle Replacement Allo… 4,433.34
100-215-61100.000 Postage 146.07
100-215-61200.000 Printing and Copying 395.31
100-215-61400.000 Office Supplies 61.81
100-215-63400.000 Police Services 1,218.23
16 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 9/24/2022 - 10/7/2022 10/7/2022 12:55:51 PM Page 13 of 17
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Payment Amount
100-215-64500.000 Phone Charges 467.64
100-215-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 1,045.20
100-215-64900.000 Other Utilities 304.00
100-215-65100.000 General Operating Suppli… 1,031.98
100-215-65200.000 Uniforms/Personnel Equi… 151.20
100-215-65400.000 Police Supplies 463.22
100-215-66100.000 Gasoline & Oil 5,768.18
100-215-67200.000 Other Training 5,803.49
100-215-95690.000 Vehicle Replacement Allo… 8,391.53
100-22210 Federal Withholding Tax … 9,671.10
100-22215 FICA Payable 14,102.73
100-22220 State Withholding Tax Pa… 3,488.98
100-22225 S.D.I. Payable 983.62
100-22410 G.P.O.A. Union Dues Paya… 320.00
100-22415 G.P.S.A. Union Dues Payab… 50.73
100-22420 S.E.I.U. Union Dues Payab… 210.36
100-22430 Deferred Comp Payable 2,782.32
100-22431 Roth 942.50
100-22435 PERS Loan Payable 178.00
100-22481 POLICE AMMUNITION 2,567.20
100-22491 MBASIA 197.91
100-22495 Planning Deposit- 4th Str… 7,111.71
100-22496 Planning Deposit- EAH De… 760.00
100-22497 Planning Deposit- 808 Oak… 239.75
100-22507 Planning Deposits- Walnut… 380.00
100-22508 Planning Deposits- Walnut… 76.00
100-22510 Planning Deposits- El Rinc… 76.00
100-22512 Planning Deposits -296 A… 604.00
100-22523 Planning Deposits – 689 E… 380.00
100-22525 Planning Deposits – Wood… 456.00
100-22527 Planning Deposits - 48 4th… 2,948.00
100-22528 Planning Deposits - 1071 … 612.00
100-22530 Planning Deposits - 802 E… 1,635.00
100-22531 Planning Deposits - 60 4th… 228.00
100-22532 Planning Deposits - Elm T… 1,216.00
100-22533 Planning Deposits - Townp… 76.00
100-22534 Planning Deposits - 5 6th … 836.00
100-230-63400.000 Animal Control Services 273.24
100-230-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 120.07
100-230-65400.000 Police Supplies 131.36
100-230-65900.000 Building Maintenance Su… 192.43
100-230-66100.000 Gasoline & Oil 88.61
100-310-61400.000 Office Supplies 108.66
100-310-64900.000 Other Utilities 19.00
100-310-65100.000 General Operating Suppli… 90.23
100-310-67200.000 Other Training 240.20
100-320-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 38.78
100-320-64900.000 Other Utilities 76.00
100-320-65200.000 Uniforms / Personnel Equ… 93.52
100-320-66100.000 Gasoline & Oil 177.23
100-320-66300.000 General Operations Equi… 21.88
100-320-67200.000 Other Training 240.20
100-320-95690.000 Vehicle Replacement Allo… 1,380.66
100-550-64100.000 Electricity 120.88
100-550-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 162.69
100-550-64900.000 Other Utilities 38.00
100-550-65200.000 Uniforms/Personnel Equi… 161.08
100-550-65700.000 Public Works Supplies 1,145.13
17 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 9/24/2022 - 10/7/2022 10/7/2022 12:55:51 PM Page 14 of 17
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Payment Amount
100-550-65900.000 Building Maintenance Su… 1,104.30
100-550-66100.000 Gasoline & Oil 177.23
100-550-66200.000 Vehicle and Equipment M… 572.66
100-550-66300.000 General Operations Equi… 18.56
100-550-67400.000 Certifications 240.20
100-551-63500.000 Recreation Services 2,530.10
100-551-63900.000 General Services 75.00
100-551-64100.000 Electricity 252.03
100-551-64200.000 Gas Utility 25.43
100-551-64900.000 Other Utilities 19.00
100-551-66100.221 Gasoline & Oil 88.61
100-551-81500.000 Vehicles 1,380.66
100-590-64200.000 Gas Utility 274.03
100-601-61400.000 Office Supplies 121.41
100-601-63600.000 Community Development… 51,017.50
100-601-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 103.52
100-601-64900.000 Ohter Utilitiies 19.00
100-601-66100.000 Gasoline & Oil 88.61
100-601-66200.000 Vehicle and Equipment M… 14.54
100-601-67100.000 Meetings & Conferences 87.03
100-601-67200.000 Other Training 1,145.00
100-601-95690.000 Vehicle Replacement Allo… 1,381.59
102-22210 Federal Withholding Tax … 8,384.41
102-22215 FICA Payable 4,185.76
102-22220 State Withholding Tax Pa… 3,107.32
102-22225 S,D.I Payable 770.21
102-22410 Union Dues Payable 280.00
102-22430 Deferred Comp Payable 418.41
102-22450 Wage Garnishments Paya… 471.68
102-250-63900.000 General Services 2,303.21
102-250-64100.000 Electricity 1,230.83
102-250-64200.000 Gas Utility 78.76
102-250-64400.000 Waste Disposal 200.00
102-250-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 334.19
102-250-65100.000 General Operating Suppli… 67.27
102-250-65200.000 Uniforms/Personnel Equi… 830.63
102-250-65400.000 Firefighter Supplies/Preve… 886.03
102-250-65600.000 Jantorial Supplies 41.83
102-250-65900.000 Building Maintenance Su… 35.00
102-250-66100.000 Gasoline & Oil 88.61
102-250-66200.000 Vehicle and Equipment M… 1,207.39
102-250-66300.000 General Operations Equi… 19.53
102-250-95690.000 Vehicle Replacement Allo… 1,641.78
220-215-65000.000 Vehicle & Equip. Parts & S… 291.55
220-215-66200.000 Vehicle and Equipment M… 89.95
220-215-71400.000 Police Equipment 2,475.64
220-215-95690.000 Vehicle Replacement Allo… 1,747.14
220-22210 Federal Withholding Tax … 7,979.03
220-22215 FICA Payable 10,315.06
220-22220 State Withholding Tax Pa… 3,578.64
220-22225 S.D.I. Payable 755.89
220-22410 G.P.O.A. Union Dues Paya… 675.00
220-22415 G.P.S.A. Union Dues Payab… 149.27
220-22430 Deferred Comp Payable 1,607.69
220-22450 Wage Garnishments Paya… 1,236.31
220-605-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 151.59
230-320-64100.000 Electricity 458.46
230-320-65700.000 Public Works Supplies 166.64
18 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 9/24/2022 - 10/7/2022 10/7/2022 12:55:51 PM Page 15 of 17
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Payment Amount
263-22210 Federal Withholding Tax … 28.29
263-22215 FICA Payable 93.40
263-22220 State Withholding Tax Pa… 6.10
263-22225 S.D.I. Payable 6.69
263-22420 S.E.I.U. Union Dues Payab… 3.96
263-360-63700.000 Public Works Services 2,365.00
263-360-64100.000 Electricity 298.72
263-360-81500.000 Vehicles 690.81
264-22210 Federal Withholding Tax … 33.43
264-22215 FICA Payable 117.90
264-22220 State Withholding Tax Pa… 7.11
264-22225 S.D.I. Payable 8.45
264-22420 S.E.I.U. Union Dues Payab… 3.96
264-360-63600.000 Assessment District Consu… 444.31
264-360-63700.000 Public Works Services 13,215.00
264-360-64100.000 Electricity 585.85
264-360-81500.000 Vehicles 690.78
265-22210 Federal Withholding Tax … 28.29
265-22215 FICA Payable 93.40
265-22220 State Withholding Tax Pa… 6.10
265-22225 S.D.I. Payable 6.69
265-22420 S.E.I.U. Union Dues Payab… 3.96
266-22210 Federal Withholding Tax … 28.18
266-22215 FICA Payable 92.88
266-22220 State Withholding Tax Pa… 6.09
266-22225 S.D.I. Payable 6.75
266-22420 S.E.I.U. Union Dues Payab… 3.95
297-22210 Federal Withholding Tax … 974.60
297-22215 FICA Payable 2,029.78
297-22220 State Withholding Tax Pa… 345.72
297-22225 S.D.I. Payable 145.91
297-22430 Deferred Comp Payable 693.94
297-597-64100.000 Electricity 665.05
297-597-64200.000 Gas Utility 16.67
297-597-64900.000 Other Utilities 198.52
297-597-65500.000 Recreation Supplies 1,562.57
297-597-66100.000 Gasoline & Oil 443.06
297-597-66200.000 Vehicle and Equipment M… 32.00
297-597-69100.000 TAMC Expenditure 1,206.54
297-598-65100.206 General Operating Suppli… 237.99
297-598-65100.209 General Operating Suppli… 101.44
380-390-81530.000 Police Vehicles 31,738.88
385-125-61400.000 Office Supplies 1,531.42
385-125-61700.000 Software Maintenance Ch… 4,676.95
385-125-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 51.76
385-125-65300.000 Technology Supplies 5,147.74
385-125-67200.000 Other Training 112.76
385-160-61400.000 Office Supplies -72.08
385-160-63900.000 General Services 164.43
385-160-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 51.60
385-160-65100.000 General Operating Suppli… 342.12
385-160-67100.000 Meetings & Conferences 537.78
385-160-68100.000 Recruitment 2,006.55
385-180-52510.000 Health Insurance 86,636.03
385-180-52530.000 Long-Term Disability Insur… 4,586.73
385-22210 Federal Withholding Tax … 1,257.09
385-22215 FICA Payable 1,387.66
385-22220 State Withholding Tax Pa… 476.19
19 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 9/24/2022 - 10/7/2022 10/7/2022 12:55:51 PM Page 16 of 17
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Payment Amount
385-22225 S.D.I. Payable 99.77
385-22430 Deferred Comp Payable 159.99
385-311-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 40.89
385-311-64900.000 Other Utilities 19.00
385-311-65200.000 Uniforms / Personnel Equ… 11.76
385-311-65600.000 Janitorial Supplies 373.42
385-311-65700.000 Public Works Supplies 419.88
385-311-65800.000 Permits & Inspections 7.50
385-311-66100.000 Gasoline & Oil 265.84
385-311-66300.000 General Operations Equi… 242.65
390-390-89141.000 New Community Center 5,000.00
503-191-63300.000 Financial Services 37.50
503-22210 Federal Withholding Tax … 1,033.81
503-22215 FICA Payable 3,790.70
503-22220 State Withholding Tax Pa… 308.64
503-22225 S.D.I. Payable 272.63
503-22420 S.E.I.U. Union Dues Payab… 153.76
503-22430 Deferred Comp Payable 215.19
503-330-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 72.60
503-330-64900.000 Other Utilities 57.00
503-330-66100.000 Gasoline & Oil 620.28
503-330-67200.000 Other Training 240.20
503-333-61700.000 Software Maintenance Ch… 1,023.00
503-333-63800.000 Sewer Collection Services 2,136.25
503-333-64100.000 Electricity 594.02
503-333-65200.000 Uniforms/Personnel Equi… 125.44
503-333-66300.000 General Equipment Opera… 210.86
503-335-63700.000 Public Works Services 5,235.45
503-335-63800.000 Sewer Treatment Services 15,773.25
503-335-63900.000 General Services 33,967.99
503-335-64100.000 Electricity 4,503.17
503-335-65200.000 Uniforms / Personnel Equ… 169.33
503-335-65600.000 Janitorial Supplies 251.20
503-335-65700.000 Public Works Supplies 647.43
503-335-66200.000 Vehicle and Equipment M… 442.24
503-335-66400.000 Sewer Operations Eqt Ma… 6,887.65
504-12392 Clark Colony-GSP Preparat… 614.37
504-191-63300.000 Financial Services 37.50
504-22210 Federal Withholding Tax … 1,502.06
504-22215 FICA Payable 4,159.16
504-22220 State Withholding Tax Pa… 497.28
504-22225 S.D.I. Payable 298.95
504-22420 S.E.I.U. Union Dues Payab… 192.11
504-22430 Deferred Comp Payable 234.81
504-340-61100.000 Postage 16.10
504-340-61200.000 Printing and Copying 1,398.69
504-340-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 72.60
504-340-64900.000 Other Utilities 76.00
504-340-65800.000 Permits & Inspections 205.00
504-340-66100.000 Gasoline & Oil 720.28
504-345-61700.000 Software Maintenance Ch… 1,023.00
504-345-63800.000 Water Production Services 694.75
504-345-63900.000 General Services 14,218.31
504-345-64100.000 Electricity 3,922.16
504-345-65200.000 Uniforms / Personnel Equ… 323.76
504-345-65700.000 Public Works Supplies 8,426.93
504-345-67200.000 Other Training 240.16
20 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 9/24/2022 - 10/7/2022 10/7/2022 12:55:51 PM Page 17 of 17
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Payment Amount
504-390-86205.000 GSA - GSP Preparation 614.38
Grand Total: 739,015.08
Project Account Summary
Project Account Key Payment Amount
**None** 739,015.08
Grand Total: 739,015.08
21 City Council Minutes
September 27, 2022
Page | 1

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2022

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Walker called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Mayor Walker, Mayor Pro-tem Untalon, Councilmembers Martinez, Tipton and White
ABSENT: None
STAFF: City Manager Wood, Chief Langborg, Public Works Director Tugel, Community Development Director Mugan, Captain Mixer, IT Director Espinosa, Science Workshop Director Sanchez, City Attorney Cochran, City Attorney Thompson, City Clerk Rathbun
GUESTS: Florentina Sanchez, Griselda Campos, Gabby Serrato, Gabriela Mireles, Laura Mireles

INVOCATION
There was a moment of silence

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
All recited the Pledge of Allegiance.

AGENDA REVIEW
No changes were made.

PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA Beatriz Diaz stated that on October 26, 2020 there was a cease and dismiss complaint against the Mayor; however, Mayor must have forgot because he violated the code of conduct on his Facebook. She stated that Mayor also posted “Abuse of Power” and asked if he was talking about Councilmember Martinez. She referred to the public comments that were said about Councilmember Martinez at the last meeting and stated that City Attorney Cochran, City Manager Wood and the Council do not know the whole story. She asked if staff knew what the person was saying was true or was she being dishonest.

She gave details regarding the situation regarding Councilmember Martinez and the comments from last meeting regarding Councilmembers Martinez’s landlord and rental situation. She also thanked Councilmember Martinez for always doing your best for the community.

A resident suggested that the Council investigate the people that were doing the accusations against Councilmember Martinez with fake profiles. She stated that most of the men here were threaten that a Latina woman would be in power and asked if was this a political strategy that the Council was doing.

Jose Gonzalez, professional process server, stated that he was here on behalf of Mrs. Serrato to serve Councilmember Yanely Martinez. Mr. Gonzalez left the paperwork with the City Clerk. 22 City Council Minutes
September 27, 2022
Page | 2
Rachel Ortiz stated that the Council was back at a 3-ring circus and it was sad because it shouldn’t be happening because this was more of a personal problem. She stated that the City would never progress if the fighting doesn’t stop. She read a message from Councilmember Martinez stating that “there was going to be a wave of changes and they were not going to know what hit them”. She asked Councilmember Martinez what she meant by that and stated that it was so important for Council not to make comments like those. She stated that the Council were the City leaders and if something was wrong, then the Council needed to make it right.

A resident stated that Councilmember Martinez helped everyone and stated that she didn’t see the men on the Council doing half of what she does.

Gabriella Serrato asked if she would be able to show her face because she did not want to be accused of being a fake profile. She stated that she was going to address comments made by Councilmember Martinez regarding attacking her or her family. She stated that she agreed with Councilmember Martinez and no one should attack her or her family; however, what she had failed to understand was that people hold leaders accountable. She stated that it was great that Councilmember Martinez helped the community and gave away free gifts and stated that she was not talking about her policies but her ethics.

She stated what kind of leader terrorizes an elderly person by saying she was going to call the IRS on her and intimated her mother and she should be accountable for their actions.

Laura Mireles stated there it goes again, being unprofessional, taking care of business that should not be spoken about at Council meetings. She stated that the Council should be talking about 12th Street, Patriot Park, Welcome to Greenfield signs, etc. and should focus on getting a restroom for the soccer fields at Patriot Park.

Yajaira Garcia thanked everyone for their service and dedication to the City. She stated that she would like to address the issue that members of the Council were using their social media against others which violated the code of conduct and it should be addressed.

Rufina Resendes stated that she has lived in Greenfield for 20 years and has known Councilmember Martinez for many years and she has been good to the community even before she was a Councilmember. She stated that the person bringing these things against Councilmember Martinez should take care of it in court and not at the Council meetings.

Maria Ramirez stated that she was here patiently waiting along with other members of the community to hear how they could help the City. She stated that everyone’s time was valuable and that it was a waste of time for everyone to talk about personal issues at the Council meetings. She stated that she was here to help her community and that there were important issues that needed to be addressed for our community.

COMMENTS FROM CITY COUNCIL
Councilmember White stated that he attended the Meals on Wheels event at the Memorial Hall and it was very well attended and invited people over 60 years of age to attend. He announced that the Market at the Gazebo was still going on. He also stated that it was time for everyone to get their flu shots and Covid vaccines. He announced the City’s workshops and stated that the next one was regarding the Science Workshop and that all prior workshops were posted on the city’s website. He thanked the Public Works Department for repairing the water leaks around town.

Councilmember Martinez thanked Fabiola Lopez, Alliance on Aging, Meals on Wheels, Leo Trujillo and the Fire Department for participating in the Meals on Wheels event. She stated that she met with Isabel from Assemblyman Rivas’ office regarding a program where they come to a community and meet with the youth regarding college applications and financial aid and invited everyone to attend. She commended the City of Seaside for their Oaxaca by the Sea event. She announced that there would be 23 City Council Minutes
September 27, 2022
Page | 3
Movies in the Park at Patriot Park hosted by the Recreation Department. She also announced that the Wakanda Forever movie would be coming out in theatres on November 11th and she would be taking 20 kids to watch the movie in Soledad and would be using her Council stipend and encouraged other Councilmembers to do the same.

Councilmember Tipton stated that people were running the stop sign at the corner of 3rd and Elm and it could become a big problem and asked that the police patrol that area more. He also stated that most water leaks in town were now repaired and thanked Public Works.

Mayor Pro-tem Untalon stated that the TAMC crosswalks on 12th Street were great and she was getting positive feedback. She stated that it was safer for the children walking to school and was hopeful to have them at all school sites and parks. She stated that Superintendent Galvan would like to have a collaborating meeting with the Council to work together for the community and youth and would like staff to work with them to set up that meeting. She stated that she would like for the Police Department to teach pedestrian safety and work with the school to do assemblies and she would also volunteer her son to speak as well. She stated that the Movies in the Park sounded great and announced that there would be a video game tournament this Saturday as well.

Mayor Walker thanked the Public Works Department for fixing the water leaks and the Recreation Department for hosting the Movies in the Park. He stated that there was a lot of speeding going on around town and that on Halloween there would be a lot of trick-o-treaters and wanted to make sure everyone was safe. He also asked that the Police Department post about the fentanyl problem and to please have everyone check their candy because there had been fentanyl pills taken because they looked like candy or cereal.

CONSENT CALENDAR
A MOTION by Councilmember Martinez, seconded by Mayor Pro-tem Untalon to approve the consent items including Warrants #316081 through #316212 and Bank Drafts #5036 through #5050 in the amount of $388,576.77, approve Minutes of the September 13, 2022 City Council Meeting, approve second reading and adopt Ordinance #558, “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Approving Amendments to Chapters 5.28 of Title 5 of The City’s Municipal Code Regarding Building Signage Standards and Maximum Hours of the Operation for Commercial Cannabis Facilities”, approve second reading and adopt Ordinance #559, “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Rezoning Assessor Parcel Numbers 024-392-001 through -006 from C-R Retail Business to R-M Multiple Family Residential with the Removal of the Mixed Used Overlay for the Stonebridge Town Homes Project” adopt Resolution #2022-85, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Authorizing the Mayor to Execute the First Amendment to Joint Exercise Powers Agreement Creating the South Salinas Valley Broadband Authority”. All in favor. Motion carried.

MAYOR’S PRESENTATION, PROCLAMATIONS, COMMUNICATIONS, RESOLUTIONS

PRESENTATION BY ELLEN MARTIN REGARDING GREENFIELD HARVEST FESTIVAL EVENT
Presentation and power point presentation was given by Silka Saavedra and Ellen Martin.

PRESENTATION – MULTICULTURAL EVENT AT PATRIOT PARK, OCTOBER 9, 2022 Presentation and power point presentation was given by Florentina Sanchez, Raul Lazaro and Griselda Campos.
24 City Council Minutes
September 27, 2022
Page | 4
PRESENTATION – ENTERPRISE VEHICLE PROGRAM
Presentation was given by Jonathan Coleman, Enterprise, and he explained the vehicle shortage.

Brooke Harris, Enterprise, gave information regarding the vehicle market.

CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS

ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD AMENDING THE CITY’S CONTRIBUTION FOR CITY EMPLOYEES PARTICIPATING IN THE

DEFERRED COMPENSATION
RESOLUTION #2022-86
Staff report was given by City Manager Wood.

Laura Mireles stated that she was not in favor of this because there were many employees that were not productive and would like to see them more productive and this should be considered at a different time.

There was discussion among the Council regarding this resolution.

A MOTION by Mayor Pro-tem Untalon, seconded by Councilmember White to adopt Resolution #2022- 86, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Amending the City’s Contribution for City Employees Participating in the Deferred Compensation”. All in favor. Motion carried.

There was a recess at 7:39 p.m.

Meeting reconvened at 7:46 p.m.

ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD TO

SUPPLEMENTALLY APPROPRIATE (I) THE CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS OUTDOOR EQUITY GRANT YEAR 1 FUNDS FOR FY 2022-2023 IN THE AMOUNT OF $268,425 TO EXECUTE THE

PROGRAMMING AND ACTIVITIES OUTLINED IN THE ORIGINAL GRANT APPLICATION (II) THE

TRANSPORTATION AGENCY FOR MONTEREY COUNTY GREENFIELD BIKE GARAGE GRANT FUNDS FOR FY 2022-2023 IN THE AMOUNT OF $36,000 TO CONTINUE TO OFFER BIKE REPAIR

WORKSHOPS AND REPAIR SERVICES TO GREENFIELD AND MONTEREY COUNTY RESOLUTION #2022-87
Staff report and power point presentation was given by Science Workshop Director Sanchez.

John Huerta, Jr. stated that he would like to thank the State Parks & TAMC for these awards. He stated that this was a big deal and it should be advertised in the local newspaper. He commended Mr. Sanchez for all his work and the programs at the Greenfield Science Workshop.

A MOTION by Mayor Pro-tem Untalon, seconded by Councilmember White to adopt Resolution #2022- 87, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield to Supplementally Appropriate (I) the California State Parks Outdoor Equity Grant Year 1 Funds for FY 2022-2023 in the amount of $268,425 to execute the programming and activities outlined in the original grant application (II) the Transportation Agency for Monterey County Greenfield Bike Garage Grant Funds for FY 2022- 2023 in the Amount of $36,000 to continue to offer Bike Repair Workshops and Repair Services to Greenfield and Monterey County”. All in favor. Motion carried. 25 City Council Minutes
September 27, 2022
Page | 5

ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A 10-YEAR AGREEMENT WITH AXON ENTERPRISES, INC. FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT TECHNOLOGY SERVICES RESOLUTION #2022-88
Staff report was given by Acting Chief Mixer and Will Alexander, AXON Enterprises.

Councilmember Martinez stated that she would like to abstain from voting on this item due to the comments that were made that she abuses her power with the police department.

A MOTION by Councilmember Tipton, seconded by Councilmember White to adopt Resolution #2022- 88, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a 10-Year Agreement with Axon Enterprises, Inc. for Law Enforcement Technology Services”. AYES: Councilmember White, Councilmember Tipton, Mayor Pro-tem Untalon and Mayor Walker. ABSTAIN: Councilmember Martinez. Motion carried.

ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD TO

SUPPLEMENTALLY APPROPRIATE PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS (CIP) BUDGET FROM FISCAL YEAR 2021/2022 TO FISCAL YEAR 2022/2023 FOR A TOTAL OF $3,141,511.00
RESOLUTION #2022-89

Staff report was given by Public Works Director Tugel.

A MOTION by Councilmember Tipton, seconded by Councilmember White to adopt Resolution #2022- 89, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield to Supplementally Appropriate Public Works Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) Budget from Fiscal Year 2021/2022 to Fiscal Year 2022/2023 for a Total of $3,141,511.00”. All in favor. Motion carried.

ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
CLOSED SESSION – Government Code Section 54956.8

CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: 221-011-039-000
City Negotiator: Public Works Director
Negotiating Parties: City of Greenfield and Esther Quement Under Negotiation: The instructions to Negotiators will concern the price and terms of payment.

CLOSED SESSION – GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957
Public Employee Performance Evaluation
Title: City Attorney
CLOSED SESSION – Government Code Section 54957.6

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Agency Designated Representative: City Manager
Employee Organization: Unrepresented Employees
CLOSED SESSION – Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – POTENTIAL LITIGATION
Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Paragraph (2) of Subdivision (e) of Section 54956.9.

There is 1 potential lawsuit.
26 City Council Minutes
September 27, 2022
Page | 6
Beatriz Diaz stated that regarding K-4 she asked that the Council really think it through because anyone could come and say things about others. She asked that the Council make sure that the allegations were in fact true.

Meeting adjourned to closed session at 8:35 p.m.

RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION
Meeting was reconvened to open session at 9:25 p.m.

There was no reportable action.

CONTINUE CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS

ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD

AMENDING THE SALARY SCHEDULE FOR THE NON-REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES RESOLUTION #2022-90
Staff report was given by City Manager Wood.

A MOTION by Councilmember White, seconded by Councilmember Tipton to adopt Resolution #2022- 90, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Amending the Salary Schedule for the Non-Represented Employees”. All in favor. Motion carried.

BRIEF REPORTS ON CONFERENCES, SEMINARS, AND MEETINGS ATTENDED BY MAYOR AND

CITY COUNCIL
Councilmember Martinez congratulated Mayor Carbone from City of Seaside as the Chair for the Monterey Bay Division of the League of California Cities.

Councilmember White reported on the TAMC meeting and stated that they were working on the Safe Routes to School program.

Mayor Walker reported on the AMBAG meeting and stated that they discussed the final numbers for the RNHA numbers.

Councilmember Tipton reported on the SVSWA meeting and stated that Sun Street location was official closed and people in the Salinas area would have to go to the Madison Lane location. He stated that Johnson Canyon and Jolon were still opened. He stated that there were issues with Madison Lane which included the road being too narrow and the traffic issue.

Councilmember Martinez reported on the MST meeting and stated that the contract with MV had expired and wasn’t sure what was going to happen. She extended her condolences to the family of the general manager of MST that passed away.

CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
City Attorney Cochran stated that the Governor signed AB2449 regarding the Brown Act and that it would be in effect January 1, 2023 and he would be updating the Council on it.

CITY MANAGER REPORT
City Manager Wood stated that staff had scheduled workshops through December 2022. 27 City Council Minutes
September 27, 2022
Page | 7

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Walker adjourned the meeting at 9:41 p.m.
_________________________
Mayor of the City of Greenfield
____________________________
City Clerk of the City of Greenfield
28 DEPOSITORY MATURITY DATE INTEREST RATE DOLLAR/PAR AMOUNT MARKET VALUE State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Immediate 0.75% 13,757,594 $ 13,757,594 $ Laif Interest (April-June 2022) $ 25,757 25,757 $
Total State of California $ 13,783,351 13,783,351 $
Wells Fargo Bank Checking Account Pool Cash Immediate 6,810,424 $ 6,810,424 $ Total Wells Fargo Bank $ 6,810,424 6,810,424 $ N/A Petty Cash General Immediate $ 1,531 $ 1,531
N/A Petty Cash Police Immediate $ 500 $ 500
Total Petty Cash $ 2,031 $ 2,031
Pro Equities Cash/ Money Market $ 43,728 $ 43,728Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Capital One Natl Assn Mclean Va Ctf Dep 2.6% 12/20/2022 2.600% $ 246,000 $ 245,638Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Capital One Bk Usa Ntl Assn Glen Allen Va Ctf 2.6% 12/20/2022 2.600% $ 246,000 $ 245,638 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Discover Bk Greenwood Del Ctf Dep 2.55% 12/20/2022 2.550% $ 246,000 $ 245,611 Pro Equities Treasury Notes United Sts Treas NTS 0.125% 1/31/2023 0.125% $ 570,000 $ 563,399 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Wells Fargo Natl Bk West Las Vegas Nev Ctf Dep 1.750% 2/21/2023 1.750% $ 249,000 $ 247,152 Pro Equities Treasury Notes United Sts Treas NTS 0.125% 6/30/2023 0.125% $ 550,000 $ 533,973 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Beal Bk Plano Tex Ctf Dep 0.550% 12/27/2023 0.550% $ 249,000 $ 238,059 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit First Natl Bk Amer East Lansing Mich Ctf Dep 0.600% 12/29/2023 0.600% $ 249,000 $ 238,164Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Beal Bk USA Las Vegas NEV Ctf Dep 0.600% 1/3/2024 0.600% $ 249,000 $ 238,014 Pro Equities Bond Federal Home Ln Bks Cons Bd 0.370% 3/8/2024 0.370% $ 570,000 $ 536,627 Pro Equities Treasury Notes United Sts Treas NTS 0.250% 6/15/2024 0.250% $ 600,000 $ 560,508 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit First Natl Bk Damriscotta ME Ctf 0.950% 12/30/2024 0.950% $ 249,000 $ 231,077 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Third Fed Svgs & Ln Assn of Cleveland Ctf Dep 0.900% 12/30/2024 0.900% $ 248,000 $ 230,013 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Morgan Stanley Bk NA Salt Lake City Utah Ctf Dep 1.800% 2/13/2025 1.800% $ 247,000 $ 233,079 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Morgan Stanley Private Bk Natl Assn PUR NY Ctf Dep 1.800% 2/13/2025 1.800% $ 247,000 $ 233,079Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Connexus Cr UN Wausau WIS SH Ctf 3.500% 08/26/25 8/26/2025 3.500% $ 249,000 $ 243,261 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Synchrony Bk Retail Ctf Dep Fidelity Instl Ctf Dep 1.200% 11/30/2026 1.200% $ 248,000 $ 218,371 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Sallie Mae Bk Salt Lake City UT Ctf Dep 1.350% 12/15/2026 1.350% $ 248,000 $ 219,487 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit State Bk India New York NY Ctf Dep 1.400% 12/30/2026 1.400% $ 248,000 $ 219,606 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Texas Exchange Bk SSB Crowlet Ctf Dep 1.300% 12/30/2026 1.300% $ 249,000 $ 219,384 Total Pro Equities $ 6,300,728 $ 5,983,870
TOTAL Cash and Investments $ 26,579,676.86 26,896,535.33 $ CITY OF GREENFIELD
Cash & Investment Report
At September 30, 2022

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITY
29 RESOLUTION #2022-91

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD RESCHEDULING THE NOVEMBER 8, 2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO NOVEMBER 15, 2022
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Greenfield meet the second and fourth Tuesday of every month; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to have at least three Councilmembers present at each meeting in order to have a quorum to conduct City business; and WHEREAS, Councilmembers wish to reschedule the November 8, 2022 meeting to November 15, 2022 due to Election Day on November 8, 2022; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Greenfield hereby reschedules the November 8, 2022 City Council Meeting to November 15, 2022.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield at a regularly scheduled meeting duly held on the 11th day of October 2022, by the following vote:

AYES, and in favor thereof, Councilmembers
NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:
_______________________________
Lance Walker, Mayor
Attest:
_______________________
Ann F. Rathbun, City Clerk
30 A PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD PROCLAIMING OCTOBER 2022

AS NATIONAL BREAST CANCER AWARENESS MONTH
During National Breast Cancer Awareness Month, our Nation honors the courage and strength of the over 3.4 million Americans who are battling this terrible disease and remembers loved ones whose lives have been affected by breast cancer. In memory of those we have lost, we pledge never to waver from our ongoing search for effective and innovative medical advancements to treat and prevent this disease.

In the United States, more than 268,000 women and approximately 2,600 men are diagnosed with breast cancer annually. While deaths from breast cancer have declined over time, it remains the second most common form of cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death overall among American women, with a staggering 41,000 lives lost each year. For this reason, the City Council urges our fellow residents and Americans, especially those who have a family history or may be at increased risk, to consult with their healthcare providers about the individual likelihood of developing breast cancer. Early detection and regular screening mammograms, followed by timely treatment upon diagnosis, can significantly improve a patient’s chance of survival.

This month, and throughout the year, the Greenfield City Council join together in support of our fellow residents and Americans diagnosed with breast cancer, those who are in remission, and those who have lost loved ones to this disease. We also commend the skilled medical professionals and dedicated researchers who provide quality treatment and care to women and men across our country. As one Nation, we will continue to strive for a future in which every American may enjoy a long, healthy life free from the threat of cancer.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, LANCE WALKER, Mayor of the City of Greenfield and the City Council do hereby proclaim October 2022 as National Breast Cancer Awareness Month
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 11th day of October 2022. __________________________
Lance Walker
Mayor of the City of Greenfield

31 A PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD PROCLAIMING CHILDREN’S ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH (CEH) DAY ON OCTOBER 13, 2022 WHEREAS, the aim of Children’s Environmental Health (CEH) Day is to raise awareness about the importance of clean air and water, safe food and consumer products, healthy environments, and stable climates to children’s health and development; and
WHEREAS, CEH Day was created by the Children’s Environmental Health Network and celebrated for the first time on October 13, 2016; and
WHEREAS, CEH Day is observed on the second Thursday in October as a means to celebrate progress of the children’s environmental health movement and create a strong network of child health advocates; and WHEREAS, CEH Day is a national effort supported by individuals, non-profit organizations, and government agencies; and WHEREAS, CEH Day encourages individuals and organizations to raise awareness and understanding of children’s environmental health issues, seek improved protections for all children, and to perform acts of sustainability or environmental health wellness; and
WHEREAS, together, we can safeguard the health, safety and wellbeing of our most precious resource: children; THEREFORE; I, Lance Walker, Mayor of the City of Greenfield do hereby proclaim Thursday, October 13, 2022 as:

CHILDREN’S ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH (CEH) DAY
In the City of Greenfield and urge all citizens to observe this day with awareness-raising and environmental health and stewardship activities to create a healthier environment for our children.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the City of Greenfield to be affixed this 11th day of October 2022.
_____________________________________
Lance Walker, Mayor of the City of Greenfield

32 DATE: September 29, 2022
AGENDA DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
PREPARED BY: Jamie Tugel, PW Director,
Douglas Pike PE, City Engineer

TITLE: A RESOLUTION AWARDING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

CONTRACT TO DENISE DUFFY & ASSOCIATES IN THE
AMOUNT OF $99,949.00 FOR THE CEQA/NEPA REVIEW AND

DOCUMENTATION FOR THE CITY WASTEWATER

TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND

EXECUTE THE CONTRACT AND ASSIGN ADDITIONAL WORK

IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS RESOLUTION

BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
On June 8, 2021 the City Council adopted the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Master Plan prepared by Carollo Engineers (dated May 2021) and the Phased Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements Alternative prepared by Wallace Group (dated December 2020). The plans recommend the replacement of the existing WWTP with a new facility that would meet the new requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board revised General Order.

The project requires Environmental review and documentation to obtain regulatory approvals and to facilitate grant funding.

The City issued a Request for Proposals for the CEQA/NEPA Review and Documentation for the City Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project on June 6, 2022. The City received 5 fully responsive proposals on July 28, 2022. After a review of each proposal and an interview process, Staff is recommending the approval of a professional services contract with Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc.in the amount of $ 99,949.00.

Additionally, it is anticipated that project management and administrative costs will be approximately 20% of the contract value or $20,000. This includes technical support by City Planning, Public Works and Engineering staff as necessary to support with background City Council Memorandum 599 El Camino Real Greenfield CA 93937 831-674-5591 www.ci.greenfield.ca.us
33 information, data and coordination to move the project forward. Additionally, the Standard City agreement allows for a 15% contingency allowance, or approximately $15,000.

FINANCIAL AND BUDGET IMPACT
The City has applied for a Grant from the Clean Water State Revolving Fund for the estimated total amount of the project. The Grant includes reimbursement for preliminary planning, design, and environmental assessment costs in addition to administrative and construction related costs.

Costs not reimbursed by the this or other Grants, will be covered by City reserves and/or debt financing. The summary of anticipated costs by this Council action includes:

1. Professional Consultant Contract Services: $99,949.00

2. Contingency: $15,000.00

3. Project Management and Administrative and technical support tasks by Staff & its consultants: $20,000.00

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council award a professional Services contract to Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc. for the CEQA/NEPA Review and Documentation for the City Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project and authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute the contracts for these services. Staff also recommends that the Public Works Director and City Manager be authorized to assign Project Management, and Administration tasks to staff, including the City Engineer, or to consultants as selected in accordance with City Purchasing Policy.

PROPOSED MOTION
I MOVE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-92, A RESOLUTION AWARDING A

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TO DENISE DUFFY & ASSOCIATES IN THE AMOUNT OF $99,949.00 FOR THE CEQA/NEPA REVIEW AND

DOCUMENTATION FOR THE CITY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE THE CONTRACT AND ASSIGN ADDITIONAL WORK

IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS RESOLUTION
34 CITY OF GREENFIELD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-92

A RESOLUTION AWARDING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
TO DENISE DUFFY & ASSOCIATES IN THE AMOUNT OF $99,949.00 FOR

THE CEQA/NEPA REVIEW AND DOCUMENTATION FOR THE CITY

WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE

THE CONTRACT AND ASSIGN ADDITIONAL WORK IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THIS RESOLUTION.

WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the Wastewater Treatment Plant Master Plan prepared by Carollo Engineers dated May 2021 including the Phased Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements Alterative report prepared by Wallace Group, dated December 2020 on June 8, 2021; and
WHEREAS, he City desires to implement the recommendations of these reports by designing and constructing a new Wastewater Treatment Plant; and WHEREAS, the City desires to contract with a professional firm with experience in Environmental review and documentation of wastewater treatment plant projects; and WHEREAS, the City issued a Request for Proposals for CEQA/NEPA Review and documentation for the City Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project on June 6, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the City received 5 fully responsive proposals on July 28, 2022 and after a review of each proposal and an interview process, Staff is recommending the approval of a professional services contract with Denise Duffy & Associates in the amount of $ 99,949.00; and

WHEREAS, additional services for project management and administration assistance will be required as part of the environmental process and staff is recommending the City Council appropriate $20,000 funding for these services; and
WHEREAS, additional budget for project contingency is authorized in the amount of 15% of the contract value in accordance with the City Standard Agreement, or approximately $15,000; and
WHEREAS, Staff also recommends that the Public Works Director and City Manager be authorized to assign Project Management and Administration tasks to staff, including the City Engineer, or to consultants as selected in accordance with City Purchasing Policy, and to approve scope and cost changes not-to-exceed the approved contingency allowance. 35 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield that:

1. A professional services contract be awarded to Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc. for the CEQA/NEPA Review and documentation for the City Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project in the amount of $99,949.00; and

2. $20,000.00 is hereby appropriated to provide Project Management and Administration tasks by staff, including the City Engineer, or to consultants as selected in accordance with City Purchasing Policy; and

3. $15,000 is hereby appropriated for a contingency to allow for approved changes is scope of services or extra work; and

4. The City Manager is authorized to approve changes in scope or extra work up to the amount of the approved contingency; and

5. The City Manager is authorized to negotiate the final terms and conditions of this contract authorized herein; and

6. The City Manager is authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Greenfield.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield, at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council held on the 11th day of October 2022, by the following vote:

AYES, and all in favor, therefore, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

_______________________________
Lance Walker, Mayor
Attest:
___________________________
Ann F. Rathbun, City Clerk
36 Rev 9/15

CITY OF GREENFIELD
AGREEMENT WITH DENISE DUFFY & ASSOCIATES, INC.

FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES OVER $25,000
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of October 11 2022 between the City of Greenfield a general law City and Municipal Corporation of the State of California ("City") and Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc. ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on October 11, 2022, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than October 11, 2023, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.

2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.

3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant represents to the City that it has the qualifications necessary to perform the tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.

4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed ninety nine thousand, nine hundred and forty nine Dollars ($99,949) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. Any terms or conditions set forth on Exhibit A or Exhibit B which do not describe the work to be performed, the payment rates and terms, or the payment schedule have not been agreed to by the City and shall not be deemed a part of this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Council or, if pursuant to its authority, the City Manager, or his or her designee. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager or the City’s representative and Consultant at the time City’s written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed 15% of the contract amount approved by City Council or $25,000, whichever is less. Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council. c. Consultant shall submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to 37 Rev 9/15
all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. d. Notwithstanding the above provisions, Consultant shall not be paid for any work performed until it has submitted to the City a fully completed and executed Internal Revenue Service Form W-9.

5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice of termination. City shall not be obligated to explain its reasons for termination. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement, such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3.

6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his or her delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.

7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities 38 Rev 9/15
related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys, notes, video and sound recordings, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.

8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City.

9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.

Consultant agrees to provide insurance in accordance with the requirements set forth in Exhibit C. If consultant uses existing coverage to comply with these requirements and that coverage does not meet the requirements set forth herein, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the existing coverage to do so.

10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 39 Rev 9/15

11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section.

12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any person regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.

13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice:

To City: City of Greenfield
599 El Camino Real
Greenfield, California 93927
Attention: - - - -
To Consultant: Denise Duffy & Associates. Inc.

Attn: Tyler Potter
947 Cass Street, Suite 5
Monterey, CA 93940

14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement, only Tyler Potter shall perform the services described in this Agreement. Tyler 40 Rev 9/15
Potter may use assistants, under their direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this Agreement. Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of Tyler Potter from Consultant's employ. Should he or she leave Consultant's employ, the city shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant.

15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement.

16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement.

17. LITIGATION. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Greenfield. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted.

18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.

19. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.

CONSULTANT CITY OF GREENFIELD
___________________________________ ________________________________ By: Denise Duffy Date Paul Wood Date
Title: President City Manager
Attest:
____________________________________ _________________________________ 41 Rev 9/15
By: Date Ann Rathbun Date
Title: City Clerk
[Two signatures of corporate officers required] Approved As to Form:
_________________________________
City Attorney Date
42 Rev 9/15

EXHIBIT A

TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
See attached scope of work.
43 City of Greenfield Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project 17 Section 3 - Scope of Work
DD&A would provide the required environmental services and associated CEQA/NEPA documentation to support the Environmental Package required for state and federal funding for improvements to the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). The City of Greenfield owns and operates the existing wastewater treatment facilities located in Monterey County and has approximately 4,000 service connections that serve an estimated population of 17,700 people. The treatment plant was constructed in 1978 and will be improved to accommodate population and development growth in the City. Improvement are detailed in the City’s RFP for engineering and environmental services. DD&A would provide environmental and permitting services in connection with the selected engineering firm who would be leading the design tasks for the proposed project. The following scope of work is based on the preliminary information provided by Tony Nisich, PE of MNS Engineers. DD&A understands that MNS Engineers (MNS) will act as the City’s consulting engineer on the proposed project. As such, DD&A will coordinate with both City staff and MNS, as well as other project team members, to facilitate completion of the proposed project.

Scope of Work
DD&A scope of work draws upon our extensive experience with completing state and federal environmental documentation and permitting for SRF projects. Since the SRF Program is partially funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), the SWRCB will use the project’s CEQA document plus the federal cross-cutting documentation in place of a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) document in what is termed “CEQA-Plus” documentation. The State Water Board does not complete a NEPA review process, but rather completes the “NEPA-like” process of CEQA-Plus. This scope of services describes DD&A’s approach to satisfy the requirements identified in the City’s RFQ, including satisfying the requirements of the SRF Environmental Package, and CEQA-Plus requirements including the Endangered Species Act, National Historic Preservation Act, Clean Air Act, and NEPA documentation. The following scope of work assumes that DD&A will work closely with MNS and the City to assess alternatives for preferred environmental approaches to reduce the timing and permitting requirements of the project.

Project Approach
The following approach has been specifically tailored to address the requirements for the proposed project. For the purposes of this scope of work, it is assumed that an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) is the appropriate level of CEQA documentation. DD&A is committed to ensuring that all Project deliverables are completed in an accurate and timely manner. Specifically, DD&A proposes the following approach:
 Regular coordination with the City and MNS (Engineering Prime Consultant) to identify key project issues/constraints early in the environmental review process.  Preparation of technical reports on key topical resource areas (i.e., biological resources and cultural resources).
 Identification of important technical issues (including environmental, processing and other project constraints) and objective strategies for addressing those issues.

Exhibit A
44 City of Greenfield Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project 18  Early coordination for CEQA-Plus will be conducted to ensure that City, MNS, DD&A, and SWRCB staff all have a common understanding of the CEQA-Plus process, schedule, and requirements.

This scope of work describes how DD&A proposes to assist with CEQA/NEPA documentation and procedural requirements.

Task 1: Project Initiation/Data Collection/Field Review This task consists of an initial review of the proposed project and consultation with MNS and City staff, as well as other staff and consultants as determined appropriate. The purpose of this task is to confirm expectations related to project deliverables, format of products, level of detail required, staff assignments and roles, and appropriate paths of communication. Items included in this task include the following: 1) one (1) project kickoff meeting with DD&A Project Manager and other members of the Project Team, to discuss project approach and scheduling, potential areas of concern, feasibility of project alternatives, and any other areas of concern; 2) field review of the project site; 3) collection and review of relevant background information related to the project; 4) identification and coordination with interested parties; and 5) authorization of technical reports. In addition, DD&A advises that the appropriate staff of the State Board's SRF Program attend this meeting or be included via conference call. This task also includes DD&A staff and technical subconsultants initial site visits, as needed. It is assumed that City staff will arrange for site access so that DD&A key staff and subconsultants can assess and document existing site conditions.

DD&A will use mapping and documentation from MNS and City staff to define the area of effect for the CEQA documentation and SRF Environmental Package. DD&A staff will prepare the preliminary mapping for technical consultants’ field analysis under Task 2, below. DD&A will ensure that we have a complete and final Project Description prior to initiating any significant efforts in analyzing potential environmental impacts which will help to streamline the schedule and reduce overall costs.

Task 2: Key Environmental Technical Analyses
The DD&A team will evaluate the environmental conditions at the project site and within the local vicinity to determine the environmental baseline for impact findings in the IS/MND to be completed in Task 3.

The technical analysis proposes Biological and Cultural Resource evaluation for CEQA-Plus compliance.

The technical reports described below will be necessary for the Environmental Package that must be prepared and submitted as a component of the SRF application (see Task 9). The following technical analyses for the project are proposed to support the Administrative Draft IS/MND.

2.1 Biological Resources Report
DD&A will prepare a Draft Biological Resources Report for the project that will include documentation of all potential and known biological resources in the project area and an assessment of the impacts of the project on those resources. The report will be of sufficient content and format to satisfy the CEQA analysis and the reporting criteria necessary for the state process. The report will also identify future regulatory permits that may be required by state and/or federal agencies. This task includes a reconnaissance-level site visit but does not include focused botanical surveys or protocol-level wildlife surveys. The need for additional biological surveys would be identified in the report.

Exhibit A
45 City of Greenfield Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project 19 The reconnaissance-level site visit will also include an analysis of presence or absence of potentially jurisdictional wetlands and/or waters. If wetland and/or water features are found, future tasks (outside of this scope of work) may be needed to fully satisfy Clean Water Act requirements, including preparation of a wetland delineation report per regulatory agency standards and acquisition of regulatory permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB).

This task has been included to meet CEQA-Plus compliance requirements and to address requirements as described in the Environmental Package. No permitting is included in this task.

2.2 Federal Biological Assessment
In addition, a biological assessment (BA) is required for any project where a federally listed species may be adversely affected, resulting in formal consultation, or affected but not adversely affected, resulting in informal consultation. In addition, even if there will be no effect on any federally listed species, the presence of proposed or designated critical habitat may require that a BA is prepared. This task has been included to meet CEQA Plus requirements as described in the Environmental Package.

2.3 Cultural Resources Report
DD&A will contract with Albion Environmental, Inc. (Albion) to perform a Phase I cultural resources inventory of the project to meet CEQA-Plus requirements. The information obtained during the review, including the location, type, and distribution of any cultural resources, will be used in determining future mitigations, if required. Albion will complete the following tasks: 1) A review of existing archaeological records located at the Central Coast Information Center at the Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History (CCoIC); 2) Pedestrian survey of the proposed Project Area; 3) Recording of any archaeological resources found during survey; 4) A report of findings and recommendations for the City. The report will be prepared to provide a description of the project, the results of the archival research, a brief context/land use of the property, the results of the field inventory, a short summary, and any recommendations for further work.

Albion is prepared to conduct Native American Section 106 Outreach and consultation if requested.

2.4 Early Evaluation of Alternatives
DD&A will prepare an early evaluation of alternatives and conduct a field study (reconnaissance level) for the identified alternatives with consideration of environmental factors. DD&A will work with the City and MNS to define alternatives of sufficient detail for this task. The following tasks are assumed:
 Perform desktop and preliminary evaluation of environmental conditions at the alternative sites/alignments.
 Conduct one field site visit for an early reconnaissance level biological field review of each alternative site/alignment.

2.5 Project Mapping/Project Area to be Addressed in CEQA Document DD&A will coordinate with the City and MNS to clearly define the project, alternatives, and prepare CEQA mapping to clearly outline the areas impacted by project activities, including all project components, staging areas, and construction limits.

Exhibit A
46 City of Greenfield Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project 20 DD&A will prepare draft project description figures and GIS mapping and delineate all areas that would be potentially impacted, including the Area of Potential Effect (APE) and Project Impact Area (PIA). This task has been included to ensure the full project area is included in the technical reports, alternatives and the CEQA analysis, to ensure appropriate consideration under SRF requirements.

Task 3: Administrative Draft IS/MND
DD&A will prepare an Administrative Draft IS/MND for the project and submit electronic copies for review and comment. The Project Description for the Administrative Draft IS/MND will be taken from information provided by the Project Manager. The electronic format will contain a complete copy of the documents (in PDF), including all graphics and technical appendices. The IS/MND will follow the most current CEQA Guidelines.

The Administrative Draft IS/MND will contain the following analysis:

3.1 Executive Summary/Mitigation Measures
The Administrative Draft IS/MND and subsequent drafts will include an Executive Summary that will provide an overview of the contents and conclusions of the IS/MND. Based upon the completed analysis in the body of the Administrative Draft IS/MND and in the technical studies, above, this section will list mitigation measures proposed for any potentially significant or significant impacts. This section will also describe how the documentation will cover NEPA requirements under CEQA-Plus federal regulations.

3.2 Project Description
The IS/MND will provide a description of the proposed project based on the data and mapping identified above, supplemental information provided by the Lead Agency, Project Manager, and DD&A’s data collection and review. As required by CEQA, the Project Description will be complete with the precise location and boundaries of the project; a statement of the objectives of the project; and a general description of the project's technical, economic, environmental, engineering, and/or construction aspects. This section will be illustrated with plans, photographs, and other graphics, as needed.

3.3 Environmental Setting
In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15063 (d)(2), the IS/MND will include a description of the environmental setting, including existing physical conditions at the time the environmental review commences from both a local and regional perspective. This environmental setting will normally constitute the baseline physical conditions by which a lead agency determines whether an impact is significant. The description of the environmental setting shall be no longer than is necessary to provide an understanding of the significant effects of the proposed project. This task also includes these two standard sections of the IS/MND:
 Public Agency Approvals Required: This section will list all public agencies anticipated to issue authorization, approval, or permit for the project.
 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: This is a standard component of the IS/MND that will be included to list the key issues that are addressed in the IS/MND.

Exhibit A
47 City of Greenfield Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project 21 3.4 Environmental Impacts and Mitigation
This section will identify potential environmental impacts of the project using relevant criteria (i.e., thresholds of significance) in order to determine the level of impact for each identified issue. The project impact section will present potentially significant impacts and identify mitigation that avoids or reduces impacts to a less-than-significant level, where feasible. The key issues to be analyzed in the IS/MND and the proposed methodology are presented below.

Aesthetics. This section of the IS/MND will include a description of the existing visual characteristics of the project site and surrounding area. No design or engineered plans are yet available for the project. This section will address potential aesthetic impacts of above-ground components as appropriate.

Agricultural Resources. This section will address impacts to agricultural resources from the project including potential for conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency (FMMP).

Air Quality. DD&A technical staff will prepare the air quality analysis for the project using guidance from the Adopted Air Districts CEQA Guidelines and the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod). The project site is located in the North-Central Coast Air Basin (NCCAB), which includes all of Monterey, Santa Cruz, and San Benito counties. CalEEMod is a statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify potential criteria pollutant and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with both construction and operations from a variety of land use projects. Primary air quality issues associated with this project would be impacts to local and regional air quality from temporary emissions of criteria pollutants, ozone precursors, and dust and diesel exhaust from construction. Greenhouse gas emissions and climate change are also addressed in the scope within a separate section below.

Biological Resources. As discussed in Task 2, DD&A’s Natural Resource Division will perform a biological resources report to be included as an appendix to the IS/MND. This section of the IS/MND will summarize the results of the site surveys and will identify biological resources onsite and in the immediate vicinity.

Identification of impacts and, if necessary, mitigation to lessen these impacts, will be provided. The sites are not anticipated to contain significant biological resources due to the disturbed nature of the site.

Cultural Resources/Tribal Cultural Resources. The IS/MND will summarize the potential for cultural resources on the project site based on the analysis of the Cultural Resources Report (to be prepared by Albion as identified in Task 2, above). The report findings are considered confidential and thus, will not be attached to the IS/MND as an appendix. As part of this task, DD&A staff will assist the City with AB 52 compliance for the proposed project. This discussion and portion of the report that addresses tribal resources will be included in the IS/MND as a separate appendix.

Energy. The IS/MND will evaluate whether the proposed project will result in potentially significant environmental impacts due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation. It will also determine if the proposed project will conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency.

Exhibit A
48 City of Greenfield Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project 22 Geology and Soils. The IS/MND will evaluate the soils and geologic characteristics of the site and area including the potential for seismicity, liquefaction, soil hazards, and their effects on proposed structures based on existing information. The IS/MND will include an assessment of potential impacts of the project associated with proposed grading, associated loss of topsoil, and erosion, based upon available information on grading and construction. It is assumed that the Lead Agency or applicant will provide a geotechnical report if additional technical geotechnical analysis is required to address specific design. If no further information is provided, mitigation will be recommended to reduce any potentially significant or significant impacts to a less-than-significant level.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG). The IS/MND will address this issue using data generated by CalEEMod as described above. The thresholds of significance adopted by the Monterey Bay Air Resources District (MBARD) will be used to evaluate impacts from GHG, if any. The project GHG emissions are likely to be small or insignificant. If there are GHG emissions from operations, they will be compared to the threshold to determine whether the project would result in a cumulative contribution to global climate change impacts. Although not anticipated due to the nature and scope of the project, if the project would result in a potentially significant (cumulatively considerable) impact, the IS/MND will contain mitigation to reduce the impact. This section will also address potential impacts of climate change on the project.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials. The IS/MND will describe any hazardous materials and their potential impacts associated with the proposed project, including any new or increased use of coagulant and chemical feed additions, chlorination and corrosion protection chemicals, and clean-in-place solutions.

Standard mitigation measures may be necessary in order to reduce project-level impacts to a less-thansignificant level.

Hydrology and Water Quality. The IS/MND will describe the drainage characteristics of the project site and area and assess potential hydrology impacts, based on the available engineering data and site background documents. This section will also assess the potential surface water quality impacts from the proposed project.

Land Use and Planning. The land use section of the IS/MND will address the project’s consistency with relevant land use policies and discuss its compatibility with surrounding uses.

Noise. The IS/MND will identify noise-sensitive receptors, if any, in close proximity to the site which may be impacted by construction and operation noise.

Public Services and Utilities. The IS/MND will provide documentation to identify potential impacts of new infrastructure due to the project. Impacts of the project on regional public services and utility systems are not anticipated based upon early information provided by the City. Records of consultation between the project team and local service providers would be used to confirm and document that no impacts to public services would occur.

Transportation. The IS/MND will address any potential traffic impacts of the proposed project based on the construction information obtained from the project engineer. Implementation of the proposed project is not anticipated to result in new significant traffic-related impacts, aside from temporary construction-related traffic impacts.

Exhibit A
49 City of Greenfield Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project 23 Wildfire. This section of the IS/MND would state whether or not the proposed project is in or near state responsibility areas or land classified as very high fire hazard severity zones. In addition, this section of the IS/MND will address the proposed project’s wildfire risks, post-wildfire risks, and compliance with the applicable emergency plan(s) in the region.

Mandatory Findings of Significance. The IS/MND will address the mandatory findings of significance for the proposed project. Although the project has the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, it is anticipated that impacts will be less-than-significant through the successful implementation of the project design considerations and mitigation measures.

3.5 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan
DD&A will create a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP) in compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 and include it in each draft of the IS/MND for the ultimate approval by the Lead Agency in conjunction with the project approval. The MMRP would act as a matrix for all mitigation related to the proposed project. The MMRP, at a minimum, will include the following information:
 The full text of each mitigation measure
 The monitoring and reporting requirements
 The entity or entities responsible for implementation, reporting, and monitoring  The timing for implementation and monitoring

3.6 Bibliography/References/Report Preparation
This section will include all cited background information, persons contacted, and individuals, agencies, and businesses that contributed to report preparation.

Task 4: Environmental Assessment of Engineering Alternatives and Ongoing Engineering Coordination Under this task, DD&A will prepare an Environmental Assessment of Engineering Alternatives used by the project engineering team as an Appendix to the required Preliminary Engineering Report. This task assumes that the project engineering team will provide general information on the alternatives. After completing the field work identified in Task 2.3 above, DD&A will prepare and submit a draft Environmental Assessment of Engineering Alternatives to the project team for review and comments. The draft will be finalized after the project engineering team and other members of the project team provide their review.

This task also includes ongoing work by DD&A to coordinate with the Lead Agency staff and consulting engineers to identify potential mitigation measures and to address environmental and design considerations based on the impacts found in the technical analyses and Preliminary Administrative Draft IS/MND. DD&A will coordinate with the engineer and design build contractor to determine proper design and construction mitigation to reduce significant impacts, if any are found. This task includes ongoing consultation throughout the course of the project.

Task 5: Screen-Check Draft IS/MND
In this task DD&A will respond to comments on the Administrative Draft IS/MND from:

Exhibit A
50 City of Greenfield Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project 24  Lead Agency
 Project Manager (Tony Nisich, PE, Consutling Engineer, MNS)  State Water Resources Control Board
o Division of Financial Assistance
o Environmental Review Unit Staff
DD&A will submit an electronic copy via email of the Screencheck Draft IS/MND to each of the parties and individuals listed above. DD&A will respond to one set of comments from each of the parties identified above. It is assumed that the SWRCB will consolidate their comments into one submittal.

Task 6: Draft IS/MND
DD&A will coordinate with the Project Manager in making the necessary revisions to the Administrative Draft IS/MND based on comments received on the screencheck draft. DD&A will provide the Lead Agency with the revised Draft IS/MND for publication and public circulation. As part of this task, DD&A is available to upload the environmental documentation and noticing to the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) CEQASubmit system.1 DD&A will also provide a copy in electronic PDF format to the Lead Agency, Project Manager and to responsible agencies. The document will be circulated for a public review period of 30 days, as required for state agency review. DD&A will prepare the Notice of Intent (NOI) to adopt a Mitigate Negative Declaration, which will be submitted to any responsible agency and commenting agency. The notice will be in electronic format and will be filed with the Monterey County Clerk by the Lead Agency.

As part of this task, DD&A will be responsible for development of the required CEQA Draft and Final Notices and confirmation of posting of these notices. Based on the specifications of the City’s RFP, this scope assumes the Lead Agency will be responsible for local posting and mailing of notices.

Task 7: Responses to Comments and Changes to the Draft IS/MND Following conclusion of the 30-day review period, DD&A will review the comments received on the Draft IS/MND and assist the Lead Agency with responding to the comments as required. DD&A, in consultation with the Lead Agency, will prepare formal responses to these comments. The comment letters and responses, as well as any necessary changes to the text of the Draft IS/MND, will be incorporated into an amendment to the Draft IS/MND. This amendment, along with the Draft IS/MND, will constitute the Final IS/MND for the project and will be submitted electronically to the Lead Agency for review.

Task 8: Final IS/MND, MMRP and Adoption
After review by the Lead Agency, DD&A will prepare the Final IS/MND for adoption. DD&A will provide electronic copies of the Final IS/MND for Lead Agency review and approval. The electronic format will contain a complete copy of the documents in PDF format, including all graphics and technical appendices.

DD&A will be responsible for development of the Draft and Final Notices of Completion (NOC) for the Draft IS/MND, and preparation of the Notice of Determination (NOD) after final adoption of the IS/MND.

DD&A will also prepare the appropriate CEQA findings for the adoption of the Negative Declaration and approval of the project. This scope of work assumes that Lead Agency staff or legal counsel will be 1 Completion of this task would be dependent on the policies of the lead agency regarding responsibility for posting environmental documentation.

Exhibit A
51 City of Greenfield Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project 25 responsible for preparing all accompanying staff reports and resolutions. In addition, this scope assumes that the Lead Agency would file the NOD with the County Clerk and would be responsible for paying all required filing fees.

DD&A will prepare a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) in compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 and include it in the ultimate approval by the City in conjunction with the project approval. The MMRP, at a minimum, will include the following information:
 The full text of each mitigation measure;
 The monitoring and reporting requirements;
 The entity or entities responsible for implementation, reporting, and monitoring; and  The timing for implementation and monitoring.

DD&A will also be responsible for posting the notices and sending the notices and final document to OPR and CEQAnet.

Task 9: Environmental Package
The project applicant intends to apply for funding through the DWSRF program with the SWRCB, the federally designated lead. An Environmental Package must be prepared and submitted to fulfill requirements for the SRF Programs, as defined by the Division of Financial Assistance, State Water Board.

DD&A will prepare the required environmental compliance forms and will assemble the supplemental information for submittal to the State Water Board. This task includes the preparation of an Administrative Draft Environmental Package. This task will also include preparation of an alternative analysis, required for projects that have a Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration, or Environmental Impact Report per the SRF Programs. DD&A will complete the environmental alternative analysis and include in the Environmental Package. This scope assumes that all comments from others on the Administrative Draft Environmental Package will be complied into a single set of comments. After the comments on the Administrative Draft are received, DD&A will revise the Environmental Package (if needed) and prepare the draft Environmental Package for State Water Board submittal. DD&A will assist SWRCB with review and approval of Environmental Package.

Task 10. Permitting Needs Memorandum
DD&A will review project materials and coordinate with the project team and our in-house permit specialist to develop a comprehensive list of which regulatory permits will be required for the proposed project. This task may include communication with regulatory agency staff to inform and confirm permitting needs for the proposed project. The result of this task will be the delivery of a permitting needs memorandum that will include a list of permits that will be required for the proposed project, schedule for the preparation and acquisition of the permits and major technical support documentation needed for inclusion for the primary applications. The permitting memorandum will also address all pertinent requirements in place that could affect proposed project schedule and permitting.

Exhibit A
52 City of Greenfield Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project 26 Task 11. Permitting Applications
Depending on the findings of the permitting needs memorandum prepared under Task 10, the proposed project may also require the preparation of permit applications. DD&A would also work with the project team to prepare applications for other regulatory approvals required for the proposed project. DD&A assumes that Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements for the City’s wastewater treatment plant expansion will be addressed primarily by the consulting engineering team selected for this project.

DD&A’s budget assumes DD&A will assist with this effort. For resource agency permits and regional permits, DD&A will prepare the initial permit applications, including all required materials, and provide to regulatory agency contacts for processing. Based on the contents of the City’s RFP, it is assumed that the City would pay permitting fees for these applications. In addition, any follow-up work on the permitting applications would be performed under a separate contract or contract amendment. Please note that, as the exact number of additional permitting applications for the proposed project are not known at this time, this task and budget are estimated. For the purposes of this scope of work, it is assumed that three major permitting applications would be required for the proposed project.

Task 12: Meetings and Project Management
This task includes attendance/involvement in meetings and conference calls, including a public meeting to adopt the Final IS/MND. Project Management task consists of project management and communication responsibilities, including correspondence, schedule/budget tracking, project oversight, and document production. Regular attendance at monthly meetings for six to eight months and four special meetings (12 meetings) is assumed in this scope of work. This is consistent with other SRF projects managed by the SWRCB where DD&A is in regular attendance.

Format of Deliverables
Per the specifications of the City’s RFP, electronic submittals shall be provided to the project team in both Microsoft Word format and as PDF format documents. DD&A would utilize our subscription to the CITRIX Sharefile system to securely transmit deliverables to the City. DD&A would ensure that all PDF submittals for draft and final CEQA documents would be provided at appropriate file sizes for posting on this City’s website. DD&A would also provide the required hardcopies of deliverables as identified in the City’s RFP.

Section 4 – Pricing
Costs for the scope of work are provided in Exhibit B.

Exhibit A
53 City of Greenfield Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project 27 Section 5 – Tentative Project Schedule
The following schedule has been formulated based on the specifications of the RFP as well as from our extensive experience on similar projects. A more fully defined project schedule would be prepared following project initiation.

Tentative Draft Schedule1
City of Greenfield Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project Task Deliverable Responsible
Party Duration Est. Completion Date
Task 1 Project Initiation/Data Collection DD&A/Project Team 2 Weeks August 26, 2022 Task 2 Key Environmental Technical
Analyses DD&A/Project Team 3 Weeks September 16, 2022
Task 3 Administrative Draft ADIS DD&A 5 Weeks October 21, 2022 Project Team Review of 1st ADIS Project Team 1 week October 28, 2022 Task 4
Environmental Assessment of
Engineering Alternatives and
Ongoing Engineering Coordination
DD&A/Project Team
11 weeks
(Concurrent with
Tasks 1-3)
October 28, 2022
Task 5 Screen-Check Draft IS/MND DD&A/Project Team 2 weeks November 11, 2022 Project Team Review of ScreenCheck Draft IS/MND Project Team 1 week November 18, 2022 Task 6 Draft IS/ND DD&A/City 1 week November 25, 2022
30-day Public Review Period
(max)2 City 4 weeks December 26, 2022
Task 7 Responses to Comments and
Changes to the Draft IS/MND DD&A/City 2 weeks January 9, 2023 Task 8 Final IS/MND and Adoption DD&A/City 1 week January 16, 2023 Task 9 Environmental Package DD&A/Project Team
23 weeks
(Concurrent with
Tasks 1-8)
January 23, 2023
Task 10 Permitting Needs Memorandum DD&A
4 Weeks
(Concurrent with
Tasks 1-3)
October 28, 2022
Task 11 Permitting Applications DD&A/Project Team TBD3 TBD3 Task 12 Meeting Attendance and Project
Management DD&A/Project Team concurrent --
Adoption of IS/MND City -- January 16, 2023
TOTAL WEEKS for Completion 22 Weeks
1 Assumes authorization to proceed for proposed project would be issued August 12th, 2022. 2 The CEQA process mandates a public review time for an IS/MND of 20-30 days. For scheduling purposes, a worst-case scenario of 30 days is assumed. DD&A will respond to any comments received on the public draft IS/MND in coordination with the City, within approximately two weeks after receipt of the public comments. The final timing of the IS/MND is ultimately dependent on City review times of the administrative, draft, and final IS/MND. 3 Exact permitting requirements for the proposed project are not known at this time. Final timing for this task would be determined upon completion of Task 10.

Exhibit A
54 Rev 9/15

EXHIBIT B

PAYMENT SCHEDULE
See attached budget.
55 Task
Principal
Senior Project
Manager/Engineering
Specialist
Project Manager
Assoc
Planner/Scientist
Asst Planner/Scientist
GIS/Computer
Specialist
Admin/Editing Subtask Cost Per Task
1 Project Initiation / Data Collection/ Field Review 6 8 8 8 8 4,996.00 2 Key Environmental Technical Analyses ‐ ‐  ‐  ‐                 ‐  ‐  ‐  15,361.00

2.1 Biological Resources Report 1 6 3 24 3 1 $ 5,1122.2 Federal Biological Assessment 1 6 4 24 3 1 $ 5,2652.3 Cultural Resources Report 4 2 3 $ 1,0302.4 Early Evaluation of Alternatives 3 4 4 2 1 $ 1,9802.5 Project Mapping/Project Area to be Addressed in CEQA Document 4 6 6 $ 1,974 3 Administrative Draft IS/MND ‐ ‐  ‐  ‐                 ‐  ‐  ‐  29,354.00

3.1 Executive Summary/Mitigation Measures 2 4 4 6 2 $ 2,3243.2 Project Description 2 6 6 8 6 2 $ 4,0423.3 Environmental Setting 2 8 8 4 2 $ 2,6503.4 Environmental Impacts and Mitigation 6 26 36 48 8 12 $ 16,3263.5 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 2 4 10 6 3 $ 3,0123.6 Bibliography/References/Report Preparation 2 2 8 $ 1,000 4 Environmental Assessment of Engineering Alternatives and Ongoing Engineering Coordination 8 4 12 4 4 5,468.005 Screen-Check Draft IS/MND 4 4 12 6 2,744.006 Draft IS/MND 2 2 5 2 4 6 2,725.007 Responses to Comments and Changes to the Draft IS/MND 5 8 10 8 3 4,446.008 Final IS/MND and Adoption 6 8 6 2 2,610.009 Environmental Package 4 2 20 16 20 2 8,512.00 10 Permitting Needs Memorandum 3 5 6 5 1 2,777.00
11 Permitting Applications (1) 2 16 16 20 2 7,008.00
12 Meetings and Project Management 8 6 12 8 4 5 6,690.00 Total Hours 47 40 151 196 175 38 70
Hourly Rate $242.00 $204.00 $153.00 $116.00 $104.00 $111.00 $70.00 Total Labor $ 11,374 $ 8,160 $ 23,103 $ 22,736 $ 18,200 $ 4,218 $ 4,900 $ 92,691 Subconsultants $ 4,761
Albion Environmental, Inc. $ 4,761
Expenses $ 1,550
Mileage (at current IRS mileage rate) $ 350Miscellaneous (hardcopies, phone, fax, cellular, postage, courier etc.) $ 1,200 Subtotal $ 6,311Administration Fee $ 947
Total Budget $ 99,949
(1) Assumes permit requirements for resource agencies; addt'l effort if needed may require add‐on DD&A, Inc. Cost Estimate
City of Greenfield Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project July 28, 2022
Exhibit B
56 Rev 12/13 9

EXHIBIT C

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
The following coverages will be provided by Consultant and maintained on behalf of the City and in accordance with the requirements set forth herein.

Commercial General Liability/Umbrella. Primary insurance shall be at least as broad as ISO-CGL form No. CG 00 01 or equivalent form, as determined by Risk Management staff.

Total limits shall be no less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence for all coverages and $1,000,000.00 general aggregate. City and its employees and agents shall be added as additional insureds using ISO additional insured endorsement form CG 20 10, or equivalent form, as determined by Risk Management staff (in no event will City accept an endorsement form with an edition date later than 1990). Coverage shall apply on a primary non-contributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance, primary or excess, available to City or any employee or agent of City. Coverage shall not be limited to the vicarious liability or supervisory role of any additional insured.

Umbrella Liability Insurance (if necessary to meet limits requirements) shall apply to bodily injury/property damage, personal injury/advertising injury, at a minimum, and shall include a “drop down” provision providing primary coverage above a maximum $25,000.00 self-insured retention for liability not covered by primary policies but covered by the umbrella policy. Coverage shall be following form to any underlying coverage. Coverage shall be provided on a “pay on behalf” basis, with defense costs payable in addition to policy limits.

There shall be no cross liability exclusion. Policies shall have concurrent starting and ending dates.

Business Auto/Umbrella Liability Insurance. Primary coverage shall be at least as broad as ISO Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 including symbol 1 (Any Auto). Limits shall be no less than $1,000,000.00 per accident. Starting and ending dates shall be concurrent. If Consultant owns no autos, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable.

Workers' Compensation/Employer's Liability shall be written on a policy form providing workers' compensation statutory benefits as required by law. Employer's liability limits shall be no less than $1,000,000 per accident or disease. Employer's liability coverage shall be scheduled under any umbrella policy described above. Unless otherwise agreed, this policy shall be endorsed to waive any right of subrogation as respect to the City, its employees or agents.

Professional Liability Insurance. Coverage shall be written on a policy form that provides professional liability insurance, errors and omissions or equivalent coverage appropriate to the Consultant's occupation or service. The policy limit shall be no less than $1,000,000.00 per claim and in the aggregate.

Consultant and City further agree as follows:

1. This Exhibit supersedes all other sections and provisions of this Agreement to the extent that any other section or provision conflicts with or impairs the provisions of this Exhibit. 57 Rev 12/13 10

2. Nothing contained in this Exhibit is to be construed as affecting or altering the legal status of the parties to this Agreement. The insurance requirements set forth in this Exhibit are intended to be separate and distinct from any other provision in this Agreement and shall be interpreted as such.

3. All insurance coverage and limits provided pursuant to this agreement shall apply to the full extent of the policies involved, available or applicable. Nothing contained in this Agreement or any other agreement relating to the City or its operations limits the application of such insurance coverage.

4. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this Exhibit are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only and is not intended by any party to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type.

5. For purposes of insurance coverage only, this Agreement will be deemed to have been executed immediately upon any party hereto taking any steps that can be deemed to be in furtherance of or towards, performance of this Agreement.

6. All general or auto liability insurance coverage provided pursuant to this Agreement, or any other agreements pertaining to the performance of this Agreement shall not prohibit Consultant, and Consultant's employees, or agents, from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives all rights of subrogation against City.

7. Unless otherwise approved by City, Consultant's insurance shall be written by insurers authorized to do business in the State of California and with a minimum “Best's” Insurance Guide rating of “A:VII+.” Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these insurance specifications.

8. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these requirements or is canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant.

9. Consultant agrees to provide evidence of the insurance required herein, satisfactory to City, consisting of certificate(s) of insurance evidencing all of the coverages required and an additional insured endorsement to Consultant's general liability and umbrella liability policies (if any) using ISO form CG 20 10 or equivalent form, as determined by Risk Management staff. Consultant shall also provide a waiver of subrogation endorsement to Consultant's workers' compensation policy applicable to the City. Certificate(s) are to reflect that the insurer will provide 30 days notice of any cancellation of coverage and all policies must be endorsed accordingly. Consultant agrees to require its insurer to modify such certificates to delete any exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation imposes no obligation and to delete the word "endeavor" with regard to any notice provisions. Consultant agrees to provide complete copies of policies to City upon request.

10. Consultant shall provide proof that policies of insurance required herein expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at 58 Rev 12/13 11
least the same coverage. Such proof will be furnished at least two weeks prior to the expiration of the coverages.

11. Consultant's insurance presented in compliance with these specifications shall not include self-insured retentions or deductibles unless declared to the City and approved by the City Manager. The City may require evidence of financial security if deductibles or self-insured are part of the Consultant's liability program.

12. Any actual or alleged failure on the part of City or any other additional insured under these requirements to obtain proof of insurance required under this Agreement or to inform Consultant of noncompliance with any insurance requirements in no way waives any right or remedy of City or any additional insured, in this or any other regard.

13. Consultant agrees to require all subconsultants or other parties hired for this project to provide general liability insurance naming as additional insureds all parties to this Agreement. Consultant agrees to obtain certificates evidencing such coverage and make reasonable efforts to ensure that such coverage is provided as required here. Consultant agrees to require that no contract used by any subconsultant or contracts Consultant enters into on behalf of City, will reserve the right to charge back to City the cost of insurance required by this agreement. Consultant agrees that upon request all agreements with subconsultants or others with whom Consultant contracts with on behalf of City, will be submitted to City for review. Failure of City to request copies of such agreement will not impose any liability on City, or its employees.

14. If Consultant is a Limited Liability Company, general liability coverage must be amended so that the Limited Liability Company and its Managers, Affiliates, employees, agents, and other persons necessary or incidental to its operation are insureds.

15. Consultant agrees to provide immediate notice to City of any claim or loss against Consultant that includes City as a defendant. City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve City.

16. It is agreed that insurance provided pursuant to these requirements will not be limited to coverage for the vicarious liability or supervisory role of any additional insured. All insurance coverage and limits provided are intended to apply to the full extent of the policies. Nothing contained in this agreement limits the application of such insurance coverage.
59 DATE: September 29, 2022
AGENDA DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
PREPARED BY: Jamie Tugel, PW Director
Douglas Pike PE, City Engineer

TITLE: A RESOLUTION AWARDING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

CONTRACT TO DENISE DUFFY & ASSOCIATES IN THE
AMOUNT OF $126,970.00 FOR THE CEQA/NEPA REVIEW AND

DOCUMENTATION FOR THE CITY WASTEWATER

TREATMENT PLANT EFFLUENT DISPOSAL SPRAY FIELD

EXPANSION PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE THE CONTRACT

AND ASSIGN ADDITIONAL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH

THIS RESOLUTION

BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
As the result of an effluent spill on May 7, 2018, the City directed its wastewater consultant to complete an Effluent Disposal Study (Wallace Group June 29, 2021) to determine the need to expand the existing effluent spray fields.

The Spray Fields were rehabilitated in 2018 to increase percolation, however the expansion is still required to assure sufficient current wet weather capacity and future capacity.

On June 8, 2021 the City Council adopted the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Master Plan prepared by Carollo Engineers (dated May 2021) and the Phased Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements Alternative prepared by Wallace Group (dated December 2020). The plans recommend the replacement of the existing WWTP with a new facility that would meet the new requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board revised General Order. The Master Plan also indicates the need to expand the spray fields.

Because of the urgent nature of this project, the City Engineer has provided a preliminary expansion plan onto existing City-owned property adjacent to the existing spray fields. See Exhibit A.

City Council Memorandum 599 El Camino Real Greenfield CA 93937 831-674-5591 www.ci.greenfield.ca.us
60 The project the expand the spray fields requires Environmental review and documentation to obtain regulatory approvals and to facilitate grant funding.

The City issued a Request for Proposals for the CEQA/NEPA Review and Documentation for the City Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project on June 6, 2022. The City received 5 fully responsive proposals on July 28, 2022. After a review of each proposal and an interview process, Staff is recommending the approval of a professional services contract with Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc.in the amount of $126,970.00. Additional services for contingency are authorized in accordance with the City Standard Agreement.

Additionally, it is anticipated that project management and administrative costs will be approximately $25,000. This includes technical support by City Planning, Public Works and Engineering staff as necessary to support with background information, data and coordination to move the project forward. Also, the Standard City agreement allows for a 15% contingency allowance, or approximately $19,000.

FINANCIAL AND BUDGET IMPACT
The City has applied for a Grant from the Clean Water State Revolving Fund for the estimated total amount of the project. The Grant includes reimbursement for preliminary planning, design, and environmental assessment costs in addition to administrative and construction related costs.

Costs not reimbursed by the this or other Grants, will be covered by City reserves and/or debt financing. The summary of anticipated costs by this Council action includes:

1. Professional Consultant Contract Services: $126,970.00

2. Contingency: $19,000.00

3. Project Management and Administrative and technical support tasks by Staff & its consultants: $25,000.00

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council award a professional Services contract to Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc. for the CEQA/NEPA Review and Documentation for the City Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project and authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute the contracts for these services. Staff also recommends that the Public Works Director and City Manager be authorized to assign Project Management, and Administration tasks to staff, including the City Engineer, or to consultants as selected in accordance with City Purchasing Policy.

PROPOSED MOTION
I MOVE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-93, A RESOLUTION AWARDING A

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TO DENISE DUFFY & ASSOCIATES IN THE AMOUNT OF $126,970.00 FOR THE CEQA/NEPA REVIEW AND

DOCUMENTATION FOR THE CITY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

EFFLUENT DISPOSAL SPRAY FIELD EXPANSION PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE THE CONTRACT AND

ASSIGN ADDITIONAL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS RESOLUTION 61 EXHIBIT A
62 CITY OF GREENFIELD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-93

A RESOLUTION AWARDING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
TO DENISE DUFFY & ASSOCIATES IN THE AMOUNT OF $126,970.00

FOR THE CEQA/NEPA REVIEW AND DOCUMENTATION FOR THE

CITY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EFFLUENT DISPOSAL

SPRAY FIELD EXPANSION PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE THE CONTRACT AND

ASSIGN ADDITIONAL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS
RESOLUTION.

WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the Wastewater Treatment Plant Master Plan prepared by Carollo Engineers dated May 2021 including the Phased Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements Alterative report prepared by Wallace Group, dated December 2020 on June 8, 2021; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to implement the recommendations of these reports by designing and constructing an expansion to the Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent Spray Fields, including completion of environmental and permitting services; and WHEREAS, the City desires to contract with a professional firm with experience in Environmental review and documentation of wastewater treatment plant projects; and WHEREAS, the City issued a Request for Proposals for CEQA/NEPA Review and documentation for the City Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvement Project on June 6, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the City received 5 fully responsive proposals on July 28, 2022 and after a review of each proposal and an interview process, Staff is recommending the approval of a professional services contract with Denise Duffy & Associates in the amount of $ 126,970.00; and

WHEREAS, additional services for project management and administration assistance will be required as part of the environmental process and staff is recommending the City Council appropriate $25,000 funding for these services; and
WHEREAS, additional budget for project contingency is authorized in the amount of 15% of the contract value in accordance with the City Standard Agreement, or approximately $19,000; and
WHEREAS, Staff also recommends that the Public Works Director and City Manager be authorized to assign Project Management and Administration tasks to staff, including the City Engineer, or to consultants as selected in accordance with City Purchasing Policy, and to approve scope and cost changes not-to-exceed the approved contingency allowance. 63 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield that:

1. A professional services contract be awarded to Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc. for the CEQA/NEPA Review and documentation for the City Wastewater Treatment Plant Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent Spray Fields Expansion Project in the amount of $126,970.00; and

2. $25,000.00 is hereby appropriated to provide Project Management and Administration tasks by staff, including the City Engineer, or to consultants as selected in accordance with City Purchasing Policy; and

3. $19,000 is hereby appropriated for a contingency to allow for approved changes is scope of services or extra work; and

4. The City Manager is authorized to approve changes in scope or extra work up to the amount of the approved contingency; and

5. The City Manager is authorized to negotiate the final terms and conditions of this contract authorized herein; and

6. The City Manager is authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Greenfield.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield, at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council held on the 11th day of October 2022, by the following vote:

AYES, and all in favor, therefore, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

_______________________________
Lance Walker, Mayor
Attest:
___________________________
Ann F. Rathbun, City Clerk
64 Rev 9/15

CITY OF GREENFIELD
AGREEMENT WITH DENISE DUFFY & ASSOCIATES, INC.

FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES OVER $25,000
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of October 11 2022 between the City of Greenfield a general law City and Municipal Corporation of the State of California ("City") and Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc. ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on October 11 2022, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than October 11, 2023, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.

2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.

3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant represents to the City that it has the qualifications necessary to perform the tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.

4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed one hundred twenty-six thousand, nine hundred and seventy Dollars ($126,970.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. Any terms or conditions set forth on Exhibit A or Exhibit B which do not describe the work to be performed, the payment rates and terms, or the payment schedule have not been agreed to by the City and shall not be deemed a part of this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Council or, if pursuant to its authority, the City Manager, or his or her designee. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager or the City’s representative and Consultant at the time City’s written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed 15% of the contract amount approved by City Council or $25,000, whichever is less. Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council. c. Consultant shall submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to 65 Rev 9/15
all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. d. Notwithstanding the above provisions, Consultant shall not be paid for any work performed until it has submitted to the City a fully completed and executed Internal Revenue Service Form W-9.

5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice of termination. City shall not be obligated to explain its reasons for termination. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement, such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3.

6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his or her delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.

7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities 66 Rev 9/15
related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys, notes, video and sound recordings, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.

8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City.

9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.

Consultant agrees to provide insurance in accordance with the requirements set forth in Exhibit C. If consultant uses existing coverage to comply with these requirements and that coverage does not meet the requirements set forth herein, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the existing coverage to do so.

10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 67 Rev 9/15

11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section.

12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any person regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.

13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice:

To City: City of Greenfield
599 El Camino Real
Greenfield, California 93927
Attention: - - - -
To Consultant: Denise Duffy & Associates. Inc.

Attn: Tyler Potter
947 Cass Street, Suite 5
Monterey, CA 93940

14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement, only Tyler Potter shall perform the services described in this Agreement. Tyler 68 Rev 9/15
Potter may use assistants, under their direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this Agreement. Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of Tyler Potter from Consultant's employ. Should he or she leave Consultant's employ, the city shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant.

15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement.

16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement.

17. LITIGATION. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Greenfield. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted.

18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.

19. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.

CONSULTANT CITY OF GREENFIELD
___________________________________ ________________________________ By: Denise Duffy Date Paul Wood Date
Title: President City Manager
Attest:
____________________________________ _________________________________ 69 Rev 9/15
By: Date Ann Rathbun Date
Title: City Clerk
[Two signatures of corporate officers required] Approved As to Form:
_________________________________
City Attorney Date
70 Rev 9/15

EXHIBIT A

TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
See attached scope of work.
71 Scope of Work
DD&A would provide the required environmental services and associated CEQA/NEPA documentation to support the Environmental Package required for state and federal funding for the Environmental Services for the proposed expansion of the effluent spray field. The project is a critical component of the Master Planning Process to address the City of Greenfield’s wastewater treatment needs through the year 2040 and to meet the new Regional Water Control Board (RWCB) General Order requirements. The City of Greenfield owns and operates the existing wastewater treatment facilities located in Monterey County and has approximately 4,000 service connections that serve an estimated population of 17,700 people.

The wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) was constructed in 1978 and the effluent spray/percolation fields will be expanded in order to improve the wastewater treatment system to accommodate anticipated growth in the City. The following scope of work is based on the preliminary information provided by Douglas Pike, PE of MNS. DD&A understands that MNS Engineers (MNS) will act as the City’s consulting engineer on the proposed project. As such, DD&A will coordinate with both City staff and MNS, as well as other project team members, to facilitate completion of the proposed project.

Scope of Work
DD&A scope of work draws upon our extensive experience with completing state and federal environmental documentation and permitting for SRF projects. Since the SRF Program is partially funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), the SWRCB will use the project’s CEQA document plus the federal cross-cutting documentation in place of a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) document in what is termed “CEQA-Plus” documentation. The State Water Board does not complete a NEPA review process, but rather completes the “NEPA-like” process of CEQA-Plus. This scope of services describes DD&A’s approach to satisfy the requirements identified in the City’s RFQ, including satisfying the requirements of the SRF Environmental Package, and CEQA-Plus requirements including the Endangered Species Act, National Historic Preservation Act, Clean Air Act, and NEPA documentation. The following scope of work assumes that DD&A will work closely with MNS and the City to assess alternatives for preferred environmental approaches to reduce the timing and permitting requirements of the project.

Project Approach
The following approach has been specifically tailored to address the requirements for the proposed project. For the purposes of this scope of work, it is assumed that an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) is the appropriate level of CEQA documentation. DD&A is committed to ensuring that all Project deliverables are completed in an accurate and timely manner. Specifically, DD&A proposes the following approach:
 Regular coordination with the City and MNS (Engineering Prime Consultant) to identify key project issues/constraints early in the environmental review process.  Preparation of technical reports on key topical resource areas (i.e., biological resources and cultural resources).
 Identification of important technical issues (including environmental, processing and other project constraints) and objective strategies for addressing those issues.

EXHIBIT A
DD&A Scope of Work – City of Greenfield Effluent Spray Field Expansion Project 72 DD&A Scope of Work – City of Greenfield Effluent Spray Field Expansion Project Section 3 - Scope of Work
DD&A would provide the required environmental services and associated CEQA/NEPA documentation to support the Environmental Package required for state and federal funding for the Environmental Services for the proposed expansion of the effluent spray field. The project is a critical component of the Master Planning Process to address the City of Greenfield’s wastewater treatment needs through the year 2040 and to meet the new Regional Water Control Board (RWCB) General Order requirements. The City of Greenfield owns and operates the existing wastewater treatment facilities located in Monterey County and has approximately 4,000 service connections that serve an estimated population of 17,700 people.

The wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) was constructed in 1978 and the effluent spray/percolation fields will be expanded in order to improve the wastewater treatment system to accommodate anticipated growth in the City. The following scope of work is based on the preliminary information provided by Douglas Pike, PE of MNS. DD&A understands that MNS Engineers (MNS) will act as the City’s consulting engineer on the proposed project. As such, DD&A will coordinate with both City staff and MNS, as well as other project team members, to facilitate completion of the proposed project.

Scope of Work
DD&A scope of work draws upon our extensive experience with completing state and federal environmental documentation and permitting for SRF projects. Since the SRF Program is partially funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), the SWRCB will use the project’s CEQA document plus the federal cross-cutting documentation in place of a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) document in what is termed “CEQA-Plus” documentation. The State Water Board does not complete a NEPA review process, but rather completes the “NEPA-like” process of CEQA-Plus. This scope of services describes DD&A’s approach to satisfy the requirements identified in the City’s RFQ, including satisfying the requirements of the SRF Environmental Package, and CEQA-Plus requirements including the Endangered Species Act, National Historic Preservation Act, Clean Air Act, and NEPA documentation. The following scope of work assumes that DD&A will work closely with MNS and the City to assess alternatives for preferred environmental approaches to reduce the timing and permitting requirements of the project.

Project Approach
The following approach has been specifically tailored to address the requirements for the proposed project. For the purposes of this scope of work, it is assumed that an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) is the appropriate level of CEQA documentation. DD&A is committed to ensuring that all Project deliverables are completed in an accurate and timely manner. Specifically, DD&A proposes the following approach:
 Regular coordination with the City and MNS (Engineering Prime Consultant) to identify key project issues/constraints early in the environmental review process.  Preparation of technical reports on key topical resource areas (i.e., biological resources and cultural resources).
 Identification of important technical issues (including environmental, processing and other project constraints) and objective strategies for addressing those issues. 73 DD&A Scope of Work – City of Greenfield Effluent Spray Field Expansion Project  Early coordination for CEQA-Plus will be conducted to ensure that City, MNS, DD&A, and SWRCB staff all have a common understanding of the CEQA-Plus process, schedule, and requirements.

This scope of work describes how DD&A proposes to assist with CEQA/NEPA documentation and procedural requirements.

Task 1: Project Initiation/Data Collection/Field Review This task consists of an initial review of the proposed project and consultation with MNS and City staff, as well as other staff and consultants as determined appropriate. The purpose of this task is to confirm expectations related to project deliverables, format of products, level of detail required, staff assignments and roles, and appropriate paths of communication. Items included in this task include the following: 1) one (1) project kickoff meeting with DD&A Project Manager and other members of the Project Team, to discuss project approach and scheduling, potential areas of concern, feasibility of project alternatives, and any other areas of concern; 2) field review of the Project site; 3) collection and review of relevant background information related to the project; 4) identification and coordination with interested parties; and 5) authorization of technical reports. In addition, DD&A advises that the appropriate staff of the State Board's SRF Program attend this meeting or be included via conference call. This task also includes DD&A staff and technical subconsultants initial site visits, as needed. It is assumed that City staff will arrange for site access so that DD&A key staff and subconsultants can assess and document existing site conditions.

DD&A will use mapping and documentation from MNS and City staff to define the area of effect for the CEQA documentation and SRF Environmental Package. DD&A staff will prepare the preliminary mapping for technical consultants’ field analysis under Task 2, below. DD&A will ensure that we have a complete and final Project Description prior to initiating any significant efforts in analyzing potential environmental impacts which will help to streamline the schedule and reduce overall costs.

Task 2: Key Environmental Technical Analyses
The DD&A team will evaluate the environmental conditions at the project site and within the local vicinity to determine the environmental baseline for impact findings in the IS/MND to be completed in Task 3.

The technical analysis proposes Biological and Cultural Resource evaluation for CEQA-Plus compliance.

The technical reports described below will be necessary for the Environmental Package that must be prepared and submitted as a component of the SRF application (see Task 9). The following technical analyses for the project are proposed to support the Administrative Draft IS/MND.

2.1 Biological Resources Report
DD&A will prepare a Draft Biological Resources Report for the project that will include documentation of all potential and known biological resources in the project area and an assessment of the impacts of the project on those resources. Ideally, DD&A will be able to conduct spring and summer plant surveys to help inform the Biological Resources Report. The report will be of sufficient content and format to satisfy the reporting criteria necessary for the state process, such as regulatory permits required by state agencies and the CEQA-Plus analysis.
74 DD&A Scope of Work – City of Greenfield Effluent Spray Field Expansion Project

2.2 Federal Biological Assessment
A biological assessment (BA) is required for any project where a federally listed species may be adversely affected, resulting in formal consultation, or affected but not adversely affected, resulting in informal consultation. In addition, even if there will be no effect on any federally listed species, the presence of proposed or designated critical habitat may require that a BA is prepared. This task has been included to meet CEQA Plus requirements as described in the Environmental Package.

2.3 Draft and Final Wetland Delineation Report
DD&A will prepare a Wetland Delineation Report of sufficient content and format to satisfy U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), Regional Water Quality Control Board, and California Coastal Commission (CCC) requirements for regulatory permitting. This task has been included to meet CEQA Plus requirements as described in the Environmental Package.

2.4 Cultural Resources Report
DD&A will contract with Albion Environmental, Inc. (Albion) to perform a Phase I cultural resources inventory of the project to meet CEQA-Plus requirements. The information obtained during the review, including the location, type, and distribution of any cultural resources, will be used in determining future mitigations, if required. Albion will complete the following tasks: 1) A review of existing archaeological records located at the Central Coast Information Center at the Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History (CCoIC); 2) Pedestrian survey of the proposed Project Area; 3) Recording of any archaeological resources found during survey; 4) A report of findings and recommendations for the City. The report will be prepared to provide a description of the project, the results of the archival research, a brief context/land use of the property, the results of the field inventory, a short summary, and any recommendations for further work.

Albion is prepared to conduct Native American Section 106 Outreach and consultation if requested.

2.5 Geotechnical Report
DD&A will contract with Pacific Crest Engineering, Inc. to perform soil sampling and provide a geotechnical report in support of the Proposed Project. The geotechnical investigation will be based upon site reconnaissance, as well as drilling, logging, and laboratory analysis of three (3) geotechnical test borings and 11 infiltration test holes. The findings of the analysis will be summarized in a geotechnical report that will include a qualitative discussion of seismic hazards associated with the site, design recommendations, including recommendations related to the suitability of on-site earth material and recommendations for imported fill material, and a summary of the soil infiltration test results. The report will also include illustrations, a scaled boring location map, boring logs, and laboratory test results1 .

2.6 Early Evaluation of Alternatives
DD&A will prepare an early evaluation of alternatives and conduct a field study (reconnaissance level) for the identified alternatives with consideration of environmental factors. DD&A will work with the City and MNS to define alternatives of sufficient detail for this task. The following tasks are assumed:
1 Pacific Crest Engineering, Inc. scope and cost estimate is attached to this Scope of Work. 75 DD&A Scope of Work – City of Greenfield Effluent Spray Field Expansion Project  Perform desktop and preliminary evaluation of environmental conditions at the alternative sites/alignments.
 Conduct one field site visit for an early reconnaissance level biological field review of each alternative site/alignment.

2.7 Project Mapping/Project Area to be Addressed in CEQA Document DD&A will coordinate with the City and MNS to clearly define the project, alternatives, and prepare CEQA mapping to clearly outline the areas impacted by project activities, including all project components, staging areas, and construction limits.

DD&A will prepare draft project description figures and GIS mapping and delineate all areas that would be potentially impacted as a Including the Area of Potential Effect (APE) and Project Impact Area (PIA).

This task has been included to ensure the full project area is included in the technical reports, alternatives and the CEQA analysis, to ensure appropriate consideration under SRF requirements.

Task 3: Prepare Administrative Draft IS/MND
DD&A will prepare an Administrative Draft IS/MND for the project and submit electronic copies for review and comment. The Project Description for the Administrative Draft IS/MND will be taken from information provided by the Project Manager. The electronic format will contain a complete copy of the documents (in PDF), including all graphics and technical appendices. The IS/MND will follow the most current CEQA Guidelines.

The Administrative Draft IS/MND will contain the following analysis:

3.1 Executive Summary/Mitigation Measures
The Administrative Draft IS/MND and subsequent drafts will include an Executive Summary that will provide an overview of the contents and conclusions of the IS/MND. Based upon the completed analysis in the body of the Administrative Draft IS/MND and in the technical studies, above, this section will list mitigation measures proposed for any potentially significant or significant impacts. This section will also describe how the documentation will cover NEPA requirements under CEQA-Plus federal regulations.

3.2 Project Description
The IS/MND will provide a description of the proposed project based on the data and mapping identified above, supplemental information provided by the Lead Agency, Project Manager, and DD&A’s data collection and review. As required by CEQA, the Project Description will be complete with the precise location and boundaries of the Project; a statement of the objectives of the project; and a general description of the project's technical, economic, environmental, engineering, and/or construction aspects. This section will be illustrated with plans, photographs, and other graphics, as needed.

3.3 Environmental Setting
In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15063 (d)(2), the IS/MND will include a description of the environmental setting, including existing physical conditions at the time the environmental review commences from both a local and regional perspective. This environmental setting will normally 76 DD&A Scope of Work – City of Greenfield Effluent Spray Field Expansion Project constitute the baseline physical conditions by which a lead agency determines whether an impact is significant. The description of the environmental setting shall be no longer than is necessary to provide an understanding of the significant effects of the proposed project. This task also includes these two standard sections of the IS/MND:
 Public Agency Approvals Required: This section will list all public agencies anticipated to issue authorization, approval, or permit for the project.
 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: This is a standard component of the IS/MND that will be included to list the key issues that are addressed in the IS/MND.

3.4 Environmental Impacts and Mitigation
This section will identify potential environmental impacts of the project using relevant criteria (i.e., thresholds of significance) in order to determine the level of impact for each identified issue. The project impact section will present potentially significant impacts and identify mitigation that avoids or reduces impacts to a less-than-significant level, where feasible. The key issues to be analyzed in the IS/MND and the proposed methodology are presented below.

Aesthetics. This section of the IS/MND will include a description of the existing visual characteristics of the project site and surrounding area. This section will address potential aesthetic impacts of aboveground components as appropriate.

Agricultural Resources. This section will address impacts to agricultural resources from the project including potential for conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency (FMMP).

Air Quality. DD&A technical staff will prepare the air quality analysis for the project using guidance from the Adopted Air Districts CEQA Guidelines and the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod). The project site is located in the North-Central Coast Air Basin (NCCAB), which includes all of Monterey, Santa Cruz, and San Benito counties. CalEEMod is a statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify potential criteria pollutant and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with both construction and operations from a variety of land use projects. Primary air quality issues associated with this project would be impacts to local and regional air quality from temporary emissions of criteria pollutants, ozone precursors, and dust and diesel exhaust from construction. Greenhouse gas emissions and climate change are also addressed in the scope within a separate section below.

Biological Resources. As discussed in Task 2, DD&A’s Natural Resource Division will perform a biological resources report to be included as an appendix to the IS/MND. This section of the IS/MND will summarize the results of the site surveys and will identify biological resources onsite and in the immediate vicinity.

Identification of impacts and, if necessary, mitigation to lessen these impacts, will be provided. The sites are not anticipated to contain significant biological resources due to the disturbed nature of the site.

Cultural Resources/Tribal Cultural Resources. The IS/MND will summarize the potential for cultural resources on the project site based on the analysis of the Cultural Resources Report (to be prepared by 77 DD&A Scope of Work – City of Greenfield Effluent Spray Field Expansion Project Albion as identified in Task 2, above). The report findings are considered confidential and thus, will not be attached to the IS/MND as an appendix. As part of this task, DD&A staff will assist the City with AB 52 compliance for the proposed project. This discussion and portion of the report that addresses tribal resources will be included in the IS/MND as a separate appendix.

Energy. The IS/MND will evaluate whether the proposed project will result in potentially significant environmental impacts due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation. It will also determine if the proposed project will conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency.

Geology and Soils. The IS/MND will evaluate the soils and geologic characteristics of the site and area including the potential for seismicity, liquefaction, soil hazards, and their effects on proposed structures based on existing information. The IS/MND will include an assessment of potential impacts of the project associated with proposed grading, associated loss of topsoil, and erosion, based upon available information on grading and construction. DD&A will contract with Pacific Crest Engineering, Inc. to perform soil sampling and provide a geotechnical report in support of the Proposed Project. DD&A will summarize the findings of the analysis of the geotechnical report in this section and include a qualitative discussion of seismic hazards associated with the site, design recommendations, including recommendations related to the suitability of on-site earth material and recommendations for imported fill material, and a summary of the soil infiltration test results. Mitigation will be recommended to reduce any potentially significant or significant impacts to a less-than-significant level.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG). The IS/MND will address this issue using data generated by CalEEMod as described above. The thresholds of significance adopted by the Monterey Bay Air Resources District (MBARD) will be used to evaluate impacts from GHG, if any. The project GHG emissions are likely to be small or insignificant. If there are GHG emissions from operations, they will be compared to the threshold to determine whether the project would result in a cumulative contribution to global climate change impacts. Although not anticipated due to the nature and scope of the project, if the project would result in a potentially significant (cumulatively considerable) impact, the IS/MND will contain mitigation to reduce the impact. This section will also address potential impacts of climate change on the project.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials. The IS/MND will describe any hazardous materials and their potential impacts associated with the proposed project, including any new or increased use of coagulant and chemical feed additions, chlorination and corrosion protection chemicals, and clean-in-place solutions.

Standard mitigation measures may be necessary in order to reduce project-level impacts to a less-thansignificant level.

Hydrology and Water Quality. The IS/MND will describe the drainage characteristics of the project site and area and assess potential hydrology impacts, based on the available engineering data and site background documents. This section will also assess the potential surface water quality impacts from the proposed project.

Land Use and Planning. The land use section of the IS/MND will address the project’s consistency with relevant land use policies and discuss its compatibility with surrounding uses. 78 DD&A Scope of Work – City of Greenfield Effluent Spray Field Expansion Project Noise. The IS/MND will identify noise-sensitive receptors, if any, in close proximity to the site which may be impacted by construction and operation noise.

Public Services and Utilities. The IS/MND will provide documentation to identify potential impacts of new infrastructure due to the project. Impacts of the project on regional public services and utility systems are not anticipated based upon early information provided by the City. Records of consultation between the project team and local service providers would be used to confirm and document that no impacts to public services would occur.

Transportation. The IS/MND will address any potential traffic impacts of the proposed project based on the construction information obtained from the project engineer. Implementation of the proposed project is not anticipated to result in new significant traffic-related impacts, aside from temporary construction-related traffic impacts.

Wildfire. This section of the IS/MND would state whether or not the proposed project is in or near state responsibility areas or land classified as very high fire hazard severity zones. In addition, this section of the IS/MND will address the proposed project’s wildfire risks, post-wildfire risks, and compliance with the applicable emergency plan(s) in the region.

Mandatory Findings of Significance. The IS/MND will address the mandatory findings of significance for the proposed project. Although the project has the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, it is anticipated that impacts will be less-than-significant through the successful implementation of the project design considerations and mitigation measures.

3.5 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan
DD&A will create a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP) in compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 and include it in each draft of the IS/MND for the ultimate approval by the Lead Agency in conjunction with the project approval. The MMRP, at a minimum, will include the following information:
 The full text of each mitigation measure
 The monitoring and reporting requirements
 The entity or entities responsible for implementation, reporting, and monitoring  The timing for implementation and monitoring

3.6 Bibliography/References/Report Preparation
This section will include all cited background information, persons contacted, and individuals, agencies, and businesses that contributed to report preparation.

Task 4: Environmental Assessment of Engineering Alternatives and Ongoing Engineering Coordination Under this task, DD&A will prepare an Environmental Assessment of Engineering Alternatives used by the City and MNS as an Appendix to the required Preliminary Engineering Report. This task assumes that the City and MNS will provide general information on the alternatives. After completing the field work identified in Task 2.3 above, DD&A will prepare and submit a draft Environmental Assessment of 79 DD&A Scope of Work – City of Greenfield Effluent Spray Field Expansion Project Engineering Alternatives to the project team for review and comments. The draft will be finalized after the City and other members of the project team provide their review.

This task also includes ongoing work by DD&A to coordinate with the Lead Agency staff and consulting engineers to identify potential mitigation measures and to address environmental and design considerations based on the impacts found in the technical analyses and Preliminary Administrative Draft IS/MND. DD&A will coordinate with the engineer and design build contractor to determine proper design and construction mitigation to reduce significant impacts, if any are found. This task includes ongoing consultation throughout the course of the project.

Task 5 Screen-Check Draft IS/MND
In this task DD&A will respond to comments on the Administrative Draft IS/MND from:
 Lead Agency
 Project Manager (Douglas Pike, PE, Consulting Engineer, MNS)  State Water Resources Control Board
o Division of Financial Assistance
o Environmental Review Unit Staff
DD&A will submit an electronic copy via email of the Screencheck Draft IS/MND to each of the parties and individuals listed above. DD&A will respond to one set of comments from each of the parties identified above. It is assumed that the SWRCB will consolidate their comments into one submittal.

Task 6: Draft IS/MND
DD&A will coordinate with the Project Manager in making the necessary revisions to the Administrative Draft IS/MND based on comments received on the screencheck draft. DD&A will provide the Lead Agency with the revised Draft IS/MND for publication and public circulation. As part of this task, DD&A is available to upload the environmental documentation and noticing to the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) CEQASubmit system.2 DD&A will also provide a copy in electronic PDF format to the Lead Agency, Project Manager and to responsible agencies. The document will be circulated for a public review period of 30 days, as required for state agency review. DD&A will prepare the Notice of Intent (NOI) to adopt a Mitigate Negative Declaration, which will be submitted to any responsible agency and commenting agency. The notice will be in electronic format and will be filed with the Monterey County Clerk by the Lead Agency.

As part of this task, DD&A will be responsible for development of the required CEQA Draft and Final Notices and confirmation of posting of these notices. This scope assumes the Lead Agency will be responsible for local posting and mailing of notices.

Task 7: Responses to Comments and Changes to the Draft IS/MND Following conclusion of the 30-day review period, DD&A will review the comments received on the Draft IS/MND and assist the Lead Agency with responding to the comments as required. DD&A, in consultation with the Lead Agency, will prepare formal responses to these comments. The comment letters and responses, as well as any necessary changes to the text of the Draft IS/MND, will be incorporated into an 2 Completion of this task would be dependent on the policies of the lead agency regarding responsibility for posting environmental documentation.
80 DD&A Scope of Work – City of Greenfield Effluent Spray Field Expansion Project amendment to the Draft IS/MND. This amendment, along with the Draft IS/MND, will constitute the Final IS/MND for the project and will be submitted electronically to the Lead Agency for review.

Task 8: Final IS/MND, MMRP and Adoption
After review by the Lead Agency, DD&A will prepare the Final IS/MND for adoption. DD&A will provide electronic copies of the Final IS/MND for Lead Agency review and approval. The electronic format will contain a complete copy of the documents in PDF format, including all graphics and technical appendices.

DD&A will be responsible for development of the Draft and Final Notices of Completion (NOC) and Notice of Determination (NOD) after final adoption of the IS/MND and CEQA findings for the adoption of the Negative Declaration and approval of the project. This scope of work assumes that Lead Agency staff or legal counsel will be responsible for preparing all accompanying staff reports and resolutions. In addition, this scope assumes that the Lead Agency would file the NOD with the County Clerk and would be responsible for paying all required filing fees.

DD&A will prepare a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) in compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 and include it in the ultimate approval by the City in conjunction with the project approval. The MMRP, at a minimum, will include the following information:
 The full text of each mitigation measure;
 The monitoring and reporting requirements;
 The entity or entities responsible for implementation, reporting, and monitoring; and  The timing for implementation and monitoring.

DD&A will also be responsible for posting the notices and sending the notices and final document to OPR and CEQAnet.

Task 9: Environmental Package
The project applicant intends to apply for funding through the DWSRF program with the SWRCB, the federally designated lead. An Environmental Package must be prepared and submitted to fulfill requirements for the SRF Programs, as defined by the Division of Financial Assistance, State Water Board.

DD&A will prepare the required environmental compliance forms and will assemble the supplemental information for submittal to the State Water Board. This task includes the preparation of an Administrative Draft Environmental Package. This task will also include preparation of an alternative analysis, required for projects that have a Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration, or Environmental Impact Report per the SRF Programs. DD&A will complete the environmental alternative analysis and include in the Environmental Package. This scope assumes that all comments from others on the Administrative Draft Environmental Package will be complied into a single set of comments. After the comments on the Administrative Draft are received, DD&A will revise the Environmental Package (if needed) and prepare the draft Environmental Package for State Water Board submittal. DD&A will assist SWRCB with review and approval of Environmental Package.

DD&A would also work with the project team to prepare applications for other regulatory approvals required for the proposed project. DD&A will prepare the initial permit applications, including all required 81 DD&A Scope of Work – City of Greenfield Effluent Spray Field Expansion Project materials, and provide to regulatory agency contacts for processing. Based on the contents of the City’s RFP, it is assumed that the City would pay permitting fees for these applications. In addition, any followup work on the permitting applications would be performed under a separate contract or contract amendment.

Task 10. Permitting Needs Memorandum
DD&A will review project materials and coordinate with the project team and our in-house permit specialist to develop a comprehensive list of which regulatory permits will be required for the proposed project. This task may include communication with regulatory agency staff to inform and confirm permitting needs for the proposed project. The result of this task will be the delivery of a permitting needs memorandum that will include a list of permits that will be required for the proposed project, schedule for the preparation and acquisition of the permits and major technical support documentation needed for inclusion for the primary applications. The permitting memorandum will also address all pertinent requirements in place that could affect proposed project schedule and permitting.

Task 11. Permitting Applications
Depending on the findings of the permitting needs memorandum prepared under Task 10, the proposed project may also require the preparation of permit applications. DD&A would also work with the project team to prepare applications for other regulatory approvals required for the proposed project. DD&A will prepare the initial permit applications, including all required materials, and provide to regulatory agency contacts for processing. Based on the contents of the City’s RFP, it is assumed that the City would pay permitting fees for these applications. In addition, any follow-up work on the permitting applications would be performed under a separate contract or contract amendment. Please note that, as the exact number of additional permitting applications for the proposed project are not known at this time, this task may be subject to a contract amendment. For the purposes of this scope of work, it is assumed that two permitting applications would be required for the proposed project.

Task 12: Meetings and Project Management
This task includes attendance/involvement in meetings and conference calls, including a public meeting to adopt the Final IS/MND. Project Management task consists of project management and communication responsibilities, including correspondence, schedule/budget tracking, project oversight, and document production. Regular attendance at monthly meetings for one year (12 meetings) is assumed in this scope of work.

Format of Deliverables
Per the specifications of the City’s RFP, electronic submittals shall be provided to the project team in both Microsoft Word format and as PDF format documents. DD&A would utilize our subscription to the CITRIX Sharefile system to securely transmit deliverables to the City. DD&A would ensure that all PDF submittals for draft and final CEQA documents would be provided at appropriate file sizes for posting on this City’s website. DD&A would also provide the required hardcopies of deliverables as identified in the City’s RFP.

Tentative Schedule and Geotechnical Scope of Work are attached to this Scope of Work. 82 Tentative Draft Schedule1
City of Greenfield Effluent Spray Field Expansion Project Task Deliverable Responsible
Party Duration Est. Completion Date
Task 1 Project Initiation/Data Collection DD&A/Project Team 2 Weeks August 26, 2022 Task 2 Key Environmental Technical
Analyses DD&A/Project Team 4 Weeks September 23, 2022
Task 3 Administrative Draft ADIS DD&A 5 Weeks October 28, 2022 Project Team Review of 1st ADIS Project Team 1 week November 4, 2022 Task 4
Environmental Assessment of
Engineering Alternatives and
Ongoing Engineering Coordination
DD&A/Project Team
12 weeks
(Concurrent with
Tasks 1-3)
November 4, 2022
Task 5 Screen-Check Draft IS/MND DD&A/Project Team 2 weeks November 18, 2022 Project Team Review of ScreenCheck Draft IS/MND Project Team 1 week November 25, 2022 Task 6 Draft IS/ND DD&A/City 1 week December 2, 2022
30-day Public Review Period
(max)2 City 4 weeks January 2, 2023
Task 7 Responses to Comments and
Changes to the Draft IS/MND DD&A/City 2 weeks January 16, 2023 Task 8 Final IS/MND and Adoption DD&A/City 1 week January 23, 2023 Task 9 Environmental Package DD&A/Project Team
24 weeks
(Concurrent with
Tasks 1-8)
January 30, 2023
Task 10 Permitting Needs Memorandum DD&A
5 Weeks
(Concurrent with
Tasks 2-3)
October 28, 2022
Task 11 Permitting Applications DD&A/Project Team TBD3 TBD3 Task 12 Meeting Attendance and Project
Management DD&A/Project Team concurrent --
Adoption of IS/MND City -- January 23, 2023
TOTAL WEEKS for Completion 23 Weeks
1 Assumes authorization to proceed for proposed project would be issued August 12th , 2022.
2 The CEQA process mandates a public review time for an IS/MND of 20-30 days. For scheduling purposes, a worst-case scenario of 30 days is assumed. DD&A will respond to any comments received on the public draft IS/MND in coordination with the City, within approximately two weeks after receipt of the public comments. The final timing of the IS/MND is ultimately dependent on City review times of the administrative, draft, and final IS/MND. 3 Exact permitting requirements for the proposed project are not known at this time. Final timing for this task would be determined upon completion of Task 10.

The schedule has been formulated based on the specifications of the RFP. A more fully defined project schedule would be prepared following project initiation.

DD&A Scope of Work – City of Greenfield Effluent Spray Field Expansion Project 83 Pricing and Tentative Project Schedule
Exhibit A, Attachment
Geotechnical
DD&A Scope of Work – City of Greenfield Effluent Spray Field Expansion Project Geotechnical Scope of Work
84 �--- � Pacific Crest

ENGIN EE RING IN C

GEOTECHNICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL I MATERIAL TESTING I SPECIAL INSPECTIONS September 15, 2021
Denise Duffy
Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc.
947 Cass Street, Suite 5
Monterey, CA 93940
Subject:

Dear Ms. Duffy,
Proposal for Geotechnical Services
Greenfield Effluent Spray Fields Expansion Project
City of Greenfield WWTP
Greenfield, California
Proposal No. PR 22-149
Pacific Crest Engineering Inc. (PCE) is pleased to present our proposal for geotechnical consulting services in conjunction with the environmental services you are providing for the City of Greenfield Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent Spray Fields Expansion Project in the City of Greenfield, California.

Our proposal is based on our discussions with your office, City Engineer Doug Pike, PE and our experience with similar projects in the Salinas Valley area. It is our understanding that the City has requested DD&A to obtain the services of a geotechnical consultant to provide supplemental infiltration testing within the proposed effluent fields expansion area, and develop earthwork recommendations for the two new effluent fields. Based on our discussions with Mr. Pike and review of the conceptual site plan it is our understanding that the expanded effluent fields will be sited to the north of the existing 26-acre effluent disposal field.

The proposed expansion area will be comprised of two new effluent fields totaling 17.7 acres, and is currently occupied by native trees and brush. No structural improvements are currently planned. The Salinas River lies approximately 1,200 feet to the north of the proposed expansion area.

SCOPE OF WORK
Based on our current understanding of the project concept and our discussions with your team, we are proposing the following work scope:

1. Site reconnaissance, work plan preparation, literature review, project coordination and administration.

2. We will mark the proposed boring and test site locations in white paint and contact Underground Service Alert (USA) at least three business days prior to drilling. We will also notify the Client and City of our planned testing location for information pertaining to potential utility locations in this area.

3. We will procure a geotechnical drilling permit from the Monterey County Environmental Health Department.
444 AIRPORT BLVD., SUITE 106 I WATSONVILLE, CA 95076 I PHONE 831-722-9446 I WWW.4PACIFIC-CREST.COM 85 Greenfield WWTP Effluent Spray Fields Expansion Project September 15, 2022

Page 2 ends

Proposal No. PR 22-149

4. Drilling and logging of three (3) geotechnical test borings and eleven (11) infiltration test holes at approximately 100-foot intervals across the approximate longitudinal center of the proposed expansion area. MNS Engineers has provided us with recommended boring locations which is included as Exhibit A with this proposal. The 3 test borings will be drilled to depths of 25 to 50 feet. The 11 infiltration test holes will be advanced to depths of 3 to 5 feet. A log of soil, bedrock, and groundwater conditions will be maintained. Disturbed and/or undisturbed soil samples will be taken at selected intervals from the borings.

5. Laboratory testing of selected soil samples to determine their relevant engineering properties.

Laboratory testing may include, as applicable, maximum density, moisture content, unit weight and grain size distribution.

6. Infiltration testing of the 11 infiltration test holes. We have budgeted three, 8-hour days for testing assume 3 to 4 test holes can be completed per day. Testing will be performed using Shallow, Quick methodology
Measures'
as outlined in the "Native Soil Assessment for Small Infiltration Based Stormwater Control guidelines prepared by Earth Systems Pacific for the Central Coast Low Impact Development Initiative. The anticipated test depth is expected to range from approximately 3 to 5 feet below bottom of design pond elevation.

7. Engineering analysis and preparation of a written report presenting our findings and conclusions. Topics covered in our report will include:
�� A qualitative discussion of the seismic hazards associated with the site, including liquefaction, lateral spreading, landsliding, seismic shaking, and the proximity to mapped active and potentially active faults.
-� Site and subgrade preparation recommendations for berm construction, including compaction recommendations, recommendations as to the suitability of the on-site earth materials for use as engineered fill, recommendations for imported fill material, and recommendations for stable cut and fill slope gradients, and backfill requirements for utility trenches . .- Infiltration test results.

The report will include illustrations, a scaled boring location map, boring logs and laboratory test results and will be prepared and signed by a California Registered Geotechnical Engineer with over 15 years of experience within the local area.

FEE FOR SERVICES
We propose to perform the scope of work outlined herein on a time and materials basis in accordance with our current Standard Fee Schedule, attached herewith. We have assumed the work is to be performed as part of a public works project. This requires compliance with public works laws requiring payment of prevailing wages and maintenance of certified payrolls, among others.

Based on our current understanding of the project concept and subject to variation among items, our Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC) to perform the services as outlined in Tasks 1 through 7 above are summarized in the following table: SEE EXHIBIT B

Page 2 ends

86 Rev 9/15

EXHIBIT B

PAYMENT SCHEDULE
See attached budget.
87 Task
Principal
Senior Project
Manager/Engineering
Specialist
Project Manager
Assoc
Planner/Scientist
Asst
Planner/Scientist
GIS/Computer
Specialist
Admin/Editing
Subtask
Cost Per
Task
1 Project Initiation / Data Collection/ Field Review 1 4 4 4 8 2,294.00 2 Key Environmental Technical Analyses - - - - - - - 18,699.00

2.1 Biological Resources Report 3 3 24 2 1 $ 4,147

2.2 Federal Biological Assessment 3 4 22 2 1 $ 4,068

2.3 Draft and Final Wetland Delineation Report (1) 4 2 8 16 6 1 $ 4,450

2.4 Cultural Resources Report 4 2 3 $ 1,030

2.5 Geotechnical Report 2 6 3 3 $ 1,848

2.6 Early Evaluation of Alternatives 1 3 8 4 1 $ 2,105

2.7 Project Mapping/Project Area to be Addressed in CEQA Document 1 2 6 $ 1,051 3 Prepare Administrative Draft ISMND - - - - - - - 18,625.00

3.1 Executive Summary/Mitigation Measures 1 3 3 4 1 $ 1,535

3.2 Project Description 3 2 5 3 2 2 $ 2,388

3.3 Environmental Setting 2 2 3 2 $ 1,072

3.4 Environmental Impacts and Mitigation 4 16 14 30 6 10 $ 9,526

3.5 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan 2 4 10 6 3 $ 3,012

3.6 Bibliography/References/Report Preparation 4 2 6 $ 1,092 4 Environmental Assessment of Engineering Alternatives and Ongoing Engineering Coordination 2 6 8 2 8 3,996.00 5 Screen-Check Draft ISMND 6 5 5 4 2,298.00
6 Draft ISMND 4 4 4 6 1,912.00
7 Responses to Comments and Changes to the Draft ISMND 1 6 6 6 3 2,690.00 8 Final ISMND, MMRP and Adoption 5 4 6 2 1,993.00
9 Environmental Package 4 12 14 16 3 6,302.00
10 Permitting Needs Memorandum 4 2 2 2 1 1,784.00
11 Permitting Applications 3 8 12 15 2 5,042.00
12 Meetings and Project Management 4 6 14 14 5 4 6,758.00 Total Hours 29 27 117 159 144 36 65
Hourly Rate $242.00 $204.00 $153.00 $116.00 $104.00 $111.00 $70.00 Total Labor $ 7,018 $ 5,508 $ 17,901 $ 18,444 $ 14,976 $ 3,996 $ 4,550 $ 72,393 Subconsultants $ 45,908
Albion Environmental, Inc. $ 5,708
Pacific Crest Engineering $ 40,200
Expenses $ 1,550
Mileage (at current IRS mileage rate) $ 350
Miscellaneous (hardcopies, phone, fax, cellular, postage, courier etc.) $ 1,200 Subtotal $ 47,458
Administration Fee $ 7,119
Total Budget $ 126,970
(1) Assumes required but may be deleted depending on survey efforts. ;ϮͿ^

dd,
&KZ'
Kd
,E/>K^d^E^^hDWd/KE^
Revised DD&A, Inc. Cost Estimate
City of Greenfield Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent Spray Fields Expansion Project September 19, 2022
88 Greenfield WWTP Effluent Spray Fields Expansion Project September 15, 2022

Page 2 ends

Proposal No. PR 22-149
Description Personnel/Item Hours $/Hour Cost/ Item
Project Coordination & Work Principal Engineer 8 195 1560 Plan Preparation Associate Engineer 8 190 1520
Literature Review Principal Engineer 8 195 1560
Site Reconnaissance Associate Engineer 10 190 1900
Site Marking & Utility Staff Engineer 3 155 465
Locating
Monterey County Drilling Staff Engineer 4 155 620
Permit Permit Fee (lump sum) 625
Exploratory Borings - Drilling Drill Rig Mob. & Drilling 10 569 5690 & Sampling Staff Engineer 10 155 1550
Misc. Materials 600
Test Hole Installation Associate Engineer 16 190 3040
(11) 12" Diameter Test Holes Staff Engineer 32 155 4960 Excavation Equip. 16 175 2800
Misc. Materials 1000
Infiltration Testing Associate Engineer 6 175 1050
(11) Quick Shallow Tests Staff Engineer 32 155 4960
Laboratory Analysis Lump Sum 2000
Engineering Analysis Principal Engineer 2 180 360
Associate Engineer 8 175 1400
Report Preparation Principal Engineer 2 180 360
Associate Engineer 8 175 1400
Draftsperson 8 95 760
$40,180.00
We therefore estimate our fees to complete the geotechnical services as described in Tasks 1 through 7 above will not exceed Forty Thousand Two Hundred Dollars ($40,200.00), unless additional services are requested. We will not exceed this amount without wdtten authorization from the Client.

This offer is valid for a period of sixty (60) days.

SCOPING ASSUMPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS
Our scope of work and fee assumes the Client and City understands the following issues:
a. The City and/or property owner will provide access to the boring locations for our drill rig, excavator and other equipment. Our scope and fee assumes the City/Client has notified all relevant parties of our intent to do work on the site.
b. We also assume we will be provided with updated site plans showing the proposed expansion area.
c. Our services will be provided on a "time and expense" basis, in accordance with our 2022 Schedule of Fees. Our fee estimate is based on the available information provided to develop this proposal. Those services not listed, emerging project requirements, preparation for and participation in meetings and presentations, and/or the designers request for additional

Page 3 ends

89 Greenfield WWTP Effluent Spray Fields Expansion Project September 15, 2022

Page 2 ends

Proposal No. PR 22-149
information beyond this scope of services will be considered extra services and will be billed in accordance with our standard rates.
d. Our scope of work and fee assumes the Client will provide a base topographic map and site plan, with a scale of 1-inch equals 20 feet or larger, prior to initiation of our work. e. We will contact USA notify both the Client and the City of our proposed test locations, however Pacific Crest Engineering Inc. will not assume responsibility for any damage to underground utilities that are not properly located by the property owner, City, Client or the Client's representative prior to drilling.

Our scope of work and fee specifically excludes the following:
a. It is possible that the initial findings of our investigation will identify potential hazards that can only be evaluated through additional subsurface exploration. We have developed a scope of work that we anticipate will be adequate, but unexpected conditions could be encountered. If additional subsurface exploration is required based on preliminary findings, we will meet with you to obtain authorization prior to continuing. We will prepare a separate proposal and cost estimate at the time any additional work is planned.
b. An environmental assessment or investigation for the presence of hazardous or toxic materials in the soil, groundwater or air; on, below or proximal to the site. This scope of work and budget also assumes that contaminated soil and/or groundwater will not be encountered. If any unusual vapors, odors or visual contamination are noticed during drilling of any test boring, the boring will be stopped, backfilled with grout and the suspected drill cuttings will be bagged, labeled for future source reference and provided to the City for their disposal. c. Design of effluent disposal systems.
d. Flooding, hydrologic or quantitative storm water runoff analyses. e. Analysis of groundwater hydrology.
f. Time spent on follow-up project meetings, review of contract plans and specifications, phone conferences, construction observation and testing services, etc., after the report is complete. We are available to provide those services of course, however the fees for these services cannot be realistically estimated this early in the project and are therefore typically billed on a "time and materials" fee basis in accordance with our latest fee schedule. We can provide a cost proposal for these post-report services once project design and construction plans are underway.

CLIENT RESPONSIBILITIES
We request the following to be furnished prior to inception of our field investigation:
a. Right of entry. We assume that we will be granted access to the property and you have notified relevant parties of our intent to do work there.
b. Location of any known underground utilities. Pacific Crest Engineering Inc. will not assume responsibility for damage to underground utilities that are not properly located by the property owner, client or a private underground locator prior to drilling. ��

Page 4 ends

90 Greenfield WWTP Effluent Spray Fields Expansion Project September 15, 2022

Page 2 ends

Proposal No. PR 22-149
c. An accurate topographic map and site plan, depicting the entire project area, at a suitable scale of 1 inch=20 feet or larger ratio.
d. Any existing plans and geotechnical/geology reports. e. Any available data, maps, drawings, and reports pertinent to the referenced site.

SCHEDULE
We estimate the work proposed herein can be completed within 8 to 10 weeks from your authorization to proceed, site access, scheduling of exploration equipment, weather and laboratory analysis permitting.

Preliminary geotechnical design criteria can be provided to the design team during the course of our investigation.

SITE DISTURBANCE
It should be understood that the proposed field exploration program will require mobilization of a drill rig and excavation equipment, resulting in ground disturbance associated with subsurface borings and excavation of a test pit. In performing this work, a certain level of site disturbance including, but not limited to, dispersion of soil, rutting, and damage to vegetation is unavoidable. We will take care to limit site disturbance associated with field operations; however, a reasonable level of disturbance shouldbe expected.

Our scope and fee does not include restoring areas disturbed by our exploration activities. Any improvements or items of importance that should beavoided during our field investigation should be brought to our attention prior to the scheduled drill date.

PACIFIC CREST ENGINEERING INC.

Page 5 ends

91 Rev 12/13 9

EXHIBIT C

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
The following coverages will be provided by Consultant and maintained on behalf of the City and in accordance with the requirements set forth herein.

Commercial General Liability/Umbrella. Primary insurance shall be at least as broad as ISO-CGL form No. CG 00 01 or equivalent form, as determined by Risk Management staff.

Total limits shall be no less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence for all coverages and $1,000,000.00 general aggregate. City and its employees and agents shall be added as additional insureds using ISO additional insured endorsement form CG 20 10, or equivalent form, as determined by Risk Management staff (in no event will City accept an endorsement form with an edition date later than 1990). Coverage shall apply on a primary non-contributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance, primary or excess, available to City or any employee or agent of City. Coverage shall not be limited to the vicarious liability or supervisory role of any additional insured.

Umbrella Liability Insurance (if necessary to meet limits requirements) shall apply to bodily injury/property damage, personal injury/advertising injury, at a minimum, and shall include a “drop down” provision providing primary coverage above a maximum $25,000.00 self-insured retention for liability not covered by primary policies but covered by the umbrella policy. Coverage shall be following form to any underlying coverage. Coverage shall be provided on a “pay on behalf” basis, with defense costs payable in addition to policy limits.

There shall be no cross liability exclusion. Policies shall have concurrent starting and ending dates.

Business Auto/Umbrella Liability Insurance. Primary coverage shall be at least as broad as ISO Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 including symbol 1 (Any Auto). Limits shall be no less than $1,000,000.00 per accident. Starting and ending dates shall be concurrent. If Consultant owns no autos, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable.

Workers' Compensation/Employer's Liability shall be written on a policy form providing workers' compensation statutory benefits as required by law. Employer's liability limits shall be no less than $1,000,000 per accident or disease. Employer's liability coverage shall be scheduled under any umbrella policy described above. Unless otherwise agreed, this policy shall be endorsed to waive any right of subrogation as respect to the City, its employees or agents.

Professional Liability Insurance. Coverage shall be written on a policy form that provides professional liability insurance, errors and omissions or equivalent coverage appropriate to the Consultant's occupation or service. The policy limit shall be no less than $1,000,000.00 per claim and in the aggregate.

Consultant and City further agree as follows:

1. This Exhibit supersedes all other sections and provisions of this Agreement to the extent that any other section or provision conflicts with or impairs the provisions of this Exhibit. 92 Rev 12/13 10

2. Nothing contained in this Exhibit is to be construed as affecting or altering the legal status of the parties to this Agreement. The insurance requirements set forth in this Exhibit are intended to be separate and distinct from any other provision in this Agreement and shall be interpreted as such.

3. All insurance coverage and limits provided pursuant to this agreement shall apply to the full extent of the policies involved, available or applicable. Nothing contained in this Agreement or any other agreement relating to the City or its operations limits the application of such insurance coverage.

4. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this Exhibit are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only and is not intended by any party to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type.

5. For purposes of insurance coverage only, this Agreement will be deemed to have been executed immediately upon any party hereto taking any steps that can be deemed to be in furtherance of or towards, performance of this Agreement.

6. All general or auto liability insurance coverage provided pursuant to this Agreement, or any other agreements pertaining to the performance of this Agreement shall not prohibit Consultant, and Consultant's employees, or agents, from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives all rights of subrogation against City.

7. Unless otherwise approved by City, Consultant's insurance shall be written by insurers authorized to do business in the State of California and with a minimum “Best's” Insurance Guide rating of “A:VII+.” Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these insurance specifications.

8. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these requirements or is canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant.

9. Consultant agrees to provide evidence of the insurance required herein, satisfactory to City, consisting of certificate(s) of insurance evidencing all of the coverages required and an additional insured endorsement to Consultant's general liability and umbrella liability policies (if any) using ISO form CG 20 10 or equivalent form, as determined by Risk Management staff. Consultant shall also provide a waiver of subrogation endorsement to Consultant's workers' compensation policy applicable to the City. Certificate(s) are to reflect that the insurer will provide 30 days notice of any cancellation of coverage and all policies must be endorsed accordingly. Consultant agrees to require its insurer to modify such certificates to delete any exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation imposes no obligation and to delete the word "endeavor" with regard to any notice provisions. Consultant agrees to provide complete copies of policies to City upon request.

10. Consultant shall provide proof that policies of insurance required herein expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at 93 Rev 12/13 11
least the same coverage. Such proof will be furnished at least two weeks prior to the expiration of the coverages.

11. Consultant's insurance presented in compliance with these specifications shall not include self-insured retentions or deductibles unless declared to the City and approved by the City Manager. The City may require evidence of financial security if deductibles or self-insured are part of the Consultant's liability program.

12. Any actual or alleged failure on the part of City or any other additional insured under these requirements to obtain proof of insurance required under this Agreement or to inform Consultant of noncompliance with any insurance requirements in no way waives any right or remedy of City or any additional insured, in this or any other regard.

13. Consultant agrees to require all subconsultants or other parties hired for this project to provide general liability insurance naming as additional insureds all parties to this Agreement. Consultant agrees to obtain certificates evidencing such coverage and make reasonable efforts to ensure that such coverage is provided as required here. Consultant agrees to require that no contract used by any subconsultant or contracts Consultant enters into on behalf of City, will reserve the right to charge back to City the cost of insurance required by this agreement. Consultant agrees that upon request all agreements with subconsultants or others with whom Consultant contracts with on behalf of City, will be submitted to City for review. Failure of City to request copies of such agreement will not impose any liability on City, or its employees.

14. If Consultant is a Limited Liability Company, general liability coverage must be amended so that the Limited Liability Company and its Managers, Affiliates, employees, agents, and other persons necessary or incidental to its operation are insureds.

15. Consultant agrees to provide immediate notice to City of any claim or loss against Consultant that includes City as a defendant. City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve City.

16. It is agreed that insurance provided pursuant to these requirements will not be limited to coverage for the vicarious liability or supervisory role of any additional insured. All insurance coverage and limits provided are intended to apply to the full extent of the policies. Nothing contained in this agreement limits the application of such insurance coverage.
94 DATE: September 20, 2022
AGENDA DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
PREPARED BY: Jamie Tugel, PW Director
Douglas Pike, PE, City Engineer
TITLE: A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INITIAL BUDGET FOR THE

IMPLEMENTATION OF A NEW CITY WASTEWATER

TREATMENT PLANT (WWTP), AWARDING A PROFESSIONAL

SERVICES CONTRACT TO HYDROSCIENCE ENGINEERS IN
THE NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF $4,185,566 FOR DESIGN

SERVICES FOR THE NEW WWTP AND RELATED

IMPROVEMENTS, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER

TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE THIS CONTRACT AND ASSIGN

ADDITIONAL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS

RESOLUTION

BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
The City Council adopted the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Master Plan prepared by Carollo Engineers dated May 2021 including the Phased Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements Alterative report prepared by Wallace Group, dated December 2020, on June 8, 2021.

The Master Plans recommend the replacement of the existing WWTP with a new facility that would meet the new requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board General Order.

The City issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade Design Services on June 6, 2022. The City received 2 fully responsive Statements of Qualifications (SOQ) on July 28, 2022, from Carollo Engineers and HydroScience Engineers.

After a review of each SOQ and an interview process, staff is recommending the approval of a professional services contract with HydroScience Engineers in an amount not-to-exceed $4,185,566 which includes a contingency for scope changes subject to City Authorization. Any subsequent change in scope and cost of services beyond that defined in the agreement will require Council Approval.

City Council Memorandum 599 El Camino Real Greenfield CA 93937 831-674-5591 www.ci.greenfield.ca.us
95 FINANCIAL AND BUDGET IMPACT
The estimated total project cost includes the following:

The City has applied for a Grant from the Clean Water State Revolving Fund for the estimated total amount of the project. The Grant includes reimbursement for preliminary planning, design, and environmental assessment costs in addition to the construction related costs. Costs not reimbursed by this or other Grants, will be covered by City reserves and/or debt financing.

In addition to the design services, staff recommends the approval for other required services including project management, value engineering and RWQCB permit processing services. These services will be included within the Grant submittal.

RECOMMENDATION
City Staff recommend the City Council award a professional Services contract to HydroScience Engineers for Design Services and appropriate funds for other services as required and authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute the contracts for these services. Staff also recommends that the Public Works Director and City Manager be authorized to assign Project & Construction Management, Value Engineering and Administration tasks to staff, including the City Engineer, or to consultants as selected in accordance with City Purchasing Policy.

PROPOSED MOTION
I MOVE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-94, A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN

INITIAL BUDGET FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A NEW CITY WASTEWATER

TREATMENT PLANT (WWTP), AWARDING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

CONTRACT TO HYDROSCIENCE ENGINEERS IN THE NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF $4,185,566 FOR DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE NEW WWTP AND RELATED

IMPROVEMENTS, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE

AND EXECUTE THIS CONTRACT AND ASSIGN ADDITIONAL WORK IN

ACCORDANCE WITH THIS RESOLUTION
A. WWTP Facilities Planning $ 718,132
B. WWTP Facilities Design $ 4,185,566
C. Construction Management $ 4,667,856
D. Value Engineering $ 239,377
E. Administration $ 820,132
F. Soft costs Contingency Allowance $ 200,000
G. Facilities Construction Total $ 33,512,811
H. Construction Contingency Allowance $ 14,362,633
I. Other Costs (environmental) $ 150,000
J. Legal/admin $ 100,000
Total Project Costs $ 58,956,507
96 CITY OF GREENFIELD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-94

A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INITIAL BUDGET FOR THE

IMPLEMENTATION OF A NEW CITY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT (WWTP), AWARDING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TO
HYDROSCIENCE ENGINEERS IN THE NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF $4,185,566

FOR DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE NEW WWTP AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS,

AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE THIS

CONTRACT AND ASSIGN ADDITIONAL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS

RESOLUTION

WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the Wastewater Treatment Plant Master Plan prepared by Carollo Engineers dated May 2021 including the Phased Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements Alterative report prepared by Wallace Group, dated December 2020 on June 8, 2021; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to contract with a professional engineering firm with experience in wastewater treatment plant design; and
WHEREAS, the City issued a Request For Proposals for Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade Design Services on June 6, 2022 and
WHEREAS, after a review of each proposal and an interview process, Staff is recommending the approval of a professional services contract with HydroScience Engineers in the amount of
$ 4,185,566; and

WHEREAS, additional services for project management, value engineering, administration, facility planning and permit assistance will be required as part of the design and approval process and staff is recommending the City Council appropriate funding for these services; and
WHEREAS, Staff also recommends that the Public Works Director and City Manager be authorized to assign Project & Construction Management, Value Engineering and Administration tasks to staff, including the City Engineer, or to consultants as selected in accordance with City Purchasing Policy.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield that:

1. The total project cost is approved in the amount of $ 58,956,507 for the purposes of budgeting and grant funding; and

2. A professional services contract be awarded to HydroScience Engineers, Inc. for Wastewater Treatment Plant design services in the amount of $4,185,566; and 97 3. That $1,059,509 is appropriated to provide Project Management, Value Engineering and Administration tasks to staff, including the City Engineer, or to consultants as selected in accordance with City Purchasing Policy; and

4. That $60,000 is appropriated as a part of and included in the Administration estimate total to extend the contract for continued technical and permit assistance services by Wallace Group; and

5. That $80,000 is appropriated as a part of and included in the Administration estimate total to extend the contract for continued technical and “City Representation to the Regional Water Control Board” assistance services by Marvin A. Rose (consultant); and

6. That $200,000 is appropriated for a contingency to allow for approved changes is scope of services or extra work; and

7. The City Manager is authorized to negotiate the final terms and conditions of the contracts authorized herein; and

8. The City Manager is authorized to execute said agreements on behalf of the City of Greenfield.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield, at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council held on the 11th day of October 2022, by the following vote:

AYES, and all in favor, therefore, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

_______________________________
Lance Walker, Mayor
Attest:
___________________________
Ann F. Rathbun, City Clerk
98 Rev 9/15

CITY OF GREENFIELD

AGREEMENT WITH HYDROSCIENCE ENGINEERS

FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of October 11, 2022 between the City of Greenfield, a general law City and Municipal Corporation of the State of California ("City"), and HydroScience Engineers, Inc. ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on October 11, 2022 and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than December 31, 2027, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.

2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.

3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant represents to the City that it has the qualifications necessary to perform the tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.

4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed Four Million One Hundred Eight-Five Thousand, Five Hundred Sixty-Six Dollars ($4,185,566) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. Any terms or conditions set forth on Exhibit A or Exhibit B which do not describe the work to be performed, the payment rates and terms, or the payment schedule have not been agreed to by the City and shall not be deemed a part of this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Council or, if pursuant to its authority, the City Manager, or his or her designee. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager or the City’s representative and Consultant at the time City’s written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed 15% of the contract amount approved by City Council or $200,000 whichever is less. Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council. c. Consultant shall submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to 99 Rev 9/15
all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. d. Notwithstanding the above provisions, Consultant shall not be paid for any work performed until it has submitted to the City a fully completed and executed Internal Revenue Service Form W-9.

5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice of termination. City shall not be obligated to explain its reasons for termination. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement, such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3.

6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his or her delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.

7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities 100
Rev 9/15
related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys, notes, video and sound recordings, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.

8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City.

9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.

Consultant agrees to provide insurance in accordance with the requirements set forth in Exhibit C. If consultant uses existing coverage to comply with these requirements and that coverage does not meet the requirements set forth herein, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the existing coverage to do so.

10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 101
Rev 9/15

11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section.

12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any person regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.

13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice:

To City: City of Greenfield
599 El Camino Real
Greenfield, California 93927
Attention: Jamie Tugel, Director of Public Works
To Consultant: HydroScience Engineers
10569 Old Placerville Road
Sacramento, CA 95827
Attention: Curtis Lam, Principal
102
Rev 9/15

14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement, only HydroScience Engineers shall perform the services described in this Agreement. HydroScience Engineers may use assistants, under their direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this Agreement. Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of Curtis Lam from Consultant's employ. Should he or she leave Consultant's employ, the city shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant.

15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement.

16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement.

17. LITIGATION. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Greenfield. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted.

18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.

19. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. 103
Rev 9/15
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.

CONSULTANT CITY OF GREENFIELD
___________________________________ ________________________________ By: Curtis Lam Date Paul Wood Date
Title: President City Manager
Attest:
____________________________________ _________________________________ By: Hilde Harris Date Ann F. Rathbun Date
Title: Chief Financial Officer City Clerk
[Two signatures of corporate officers required] Approved As to Form:
_________________________________
City Attorney Date
104
Rev 9/15

EXHIBIT A

TASKS TO BE PERFORMED

SCOPE OF SERVICES
This section presents the proposed design scope of services for the City of Greenfield (City) WWTP Upgrade Project (Project). This scope is based on the contents of the RFP, our understanding of the project, and our experience implementing similar projects elsewhere.

Included in this section are a description of the proposed Project, the proposed scope of work, and optional services to support the project through the bidding and construction phases.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A description of the facilities proposed to be included in the project is included below. • 24-inch influent sanitary sewer in Walnut Avenue to replace an existing 14-inch. • Yard piping to connect the allow for the routing of flow from the existing collection system to the new plant processes.
• Site grading and site work as required to create a level site that brings the unit processes out of the 100-year floodplain. This will either result in the creation of new of upgraded levees or elevating of the lands containing the WWTP.
• Paved access roads to access each unit process of the plant and connect to the road leading to the aeration ponds.
• Site fencing and security in accordance with City standards. • Headworks consisting of a parshall flume and coarse bar screen with a washer/compactor and roll off facility for screenings removal.
• Duplex submersible influent pump station capable of pumping the peak hour flow to the new treatment processes. Plant drain lines will be run either to the influent pump station or recirculation pump station.
• Should bypass of the plant be required for any reason, a gravity overflow pipe from the influent pump station to the emergency storage pond would route screened influent to the newly graded and lined emergency storage and equalization pond. The pond will be sized to handle existing diurnal flow variations and allow for emergency efforts by plant staff to reasonably occur with a specific time period.
• The recirculation pump station will be outfitted with dual submersible pumps capable of pumping emergency storage and equalization pond to either the MBR fine screen or to the plant headworks.
• New prepackaged MBR treatment plant consisting of four Cloacina M500 systems (or approved equal), capable of producing approximately 2 MGD of effluent meeting the WDR effluent limitations for BOD and TSS. Additional details about the Cloacina M500 layout and features are shown in FIGURE 1-1. The exact configuration of the MBR would be determined as part of a treatment plant procurement RFP prepared by HydroScience shortly after completion of the preliminary design phase. The prepackaged MBR will include fine screening, anoxic tanks, aeration tanks, mixed liquor recirculation, membrane tanks, clearwell, permeate pumps, blowers, chemical storage and metering, a self contained control panel, walkways allowing for tank access, and accessible appurtenances to facilitate maintenance. Tank materials will be stainless steel. 105
Rev 9/15
• In-line UV disinfection reactors with medium pressure high output UV lamps, break tank, and clearwell for keeping the lamps cool, installed outdoors. • 18-inch effluent pipeline to convey disinfected tertiary recycled water to the aeration ponds from the UV system. Depending on hydraulics and elevation, effluent may flow either by gravity or be pumped. If pumping is required, an effluent pump station will be located next to the UV disinfection system. If gravity flow is required, HydroScience will evaluate the need for a siphon.
• A pre-packaged sludge dewatering system will receive waste activated sludge from the MBR. WAS will be stored in prepackaged aerated sludge storage tanks, similar to the MBR tankage, and pumped through a screw press. Cake from the screw press will fall into a dumpster, which will be hauled off periodically. This scope was written assuming that the sludge dewatering system would be implemented as a separate construction project to be implemented prior to the overall WWTP Upgrade Project. • The City desires that the WWTP will include facilities for Administration, Operations, Maintenance, and Storage. These facilities can be provided as either separate or combined facilities, and will be determined during the preliminary design phase. The Operations components will include with a reception area, operations/SCADA office, process laboratory, locker and rest rooms, kitchenette and break room, and dedicated electrical room housing the MCC and Main Control Panel. The Maintenance components will include a workshop area accessible through roll-up doors and outfitted with an overhead crane, areas for equipment storage, plant repairs, and restroom. Building(s) will be equipped with HVAC, security, and be ADA compliant.
• SCADA system designed to allow for full remote monitoring and control of the new WWTP. It is assumed that the WWTP will have complete internal SCADA controls connected within the plant via fiber. To connect the WWTP to other City facilities, HydroScience will evaluate whether radio or fiber is preferred. • Upgraded primary power supply to the WWTP to be coordinated with PG&E. This power supply may include power required just for the WWTP or potentially considerations for a new substation. The specifics of the power supply requirements will be coordinated by HydroScience but determined by PG&E. HydroScience has located a transformer near the anticipated power drop on Walnut Avenue.
• Backup power supply in the form of a standby generator located outdoors. The sizing of the standby generator will be determined during the design phase, and will be sized either for all or a portion of the anticipated plant loads. Power supply will be equipped with an automatic transfer switch.
• Site Features:
o LED building perimeter site lighting with photocell
o Hose bibs for washdown water
o Parking for vehicles
o Access for entry, exit, and staging of a crane/maintenance vehicles to perform long-term heavy maintenance
o Passive odor control to ventilate engineered building, plant return pump station and emergency storage facilities.
o Curbs and catch basins as necessary
o Reserved areas to be landscaped by others as determined through the workshop process
106
Rev 9/15
It was noted that the existing WWTP will remain in operation during construction of the new WWTP. Once the new WWTP has demonstrated its ability to comply with WDR effluent limitations, and completed its performance period, HydroScience will work with the City to determine timing for existing WWTP demolition or abandonment. We have assumed that the existing WWTP that will operate during the construction of the new WWTP.

Following successful operation of the WWTP Upgrade, the City would like the Contractor hired to construct the WWTP Upgrade to also demolish the existing plant. Provisions will be included in the WWTP Upgrade project contract documents to have the contractor decommission and demolish the existing plant.

SCOPE OF WORK
Task 1 – Preliminary Design Report
Four separate tasks are included in Task 1: the topographic survey, boundary survey, geotechnical investigation, floodplain analysis, influent water quality sampling and analysis, and the preparation of the Preliminary Design Report.

Topographic Survey: A topographic survey will be prepared for the WWTP site, the road connecting the WWTP site to the ponds, the aeration ponds, and the influent sewer on Walnut Avenue. Survey will be tied to California State Plane Zone IV [NAD83 (2011) Epoch 2017.5] and NAVD88. Project survey control will be developed for use in topographic mapping and future construction staking. Primary control network will be performed using static GNSS equipment and methods. GNSS data will be processed using Trimble Business Center software and adjusted by the least squares method using Star*Net software. An adjustment report can be provided upon request.

Aerial mapping of the Project will be performed by Central Coast Aerial Mapping (CCAM).

Praxis will coordinate with CCAM to set aerial panels and establish control values on said panels. Aerial mapping will be compiled at a 1” = 40’ scale with 1-foot contours and will include all visible plan features as well as spot elevations.

Praxis will perform field survey for topographic mapping purposes to supplement a portion of the aerial mapping. Supplemental survey will include areas of the WWTP and aeration ponds and other critical WWTP features needed to complete the detailed design. Praxis will locate surface utilities, major trees, roads, driveways, edge of paving, structures, buildings, tanks, manholes, vaults, concrete pads, walls, poles, signs, fences, slopes, curbs, drop inlets, culverts, valves, pipelines, other existing facilities, and topographic features. Storm drain and sanitary sewer manholes will be opened, where possible, to measure invert depth and identify the direction and size of pipes.

Praxis will prepare the topographic and utility mapping survey in AutoCAD/Civil 3D format including Civil 3D points, surface file, and all line work flattened to a zero elevation. The orthophoto will be georeferenced into AutoCAD and provided by CCAM. The deliverable for the topographic survey will be incorporated into the PDR figures and the deliverables within the Detailed Design tasks.
107
Rev 9/15
Boundary Survey: Praxis will research maps and deeds, review title report and chain of title.

Praxis will obtain up to three title reports to support this effort. Praxis will perform field surveys to search for and recover existing boundary monuments and other evidence of boundary location.

Following the field work, Praxis will calculate boundary lines and corners of the subject parcels.

Boundary and easement information will be combined with topographic mapping in AutoCAD format.

Geotechnical Investigation: To evaluate the subsurface conditions and perform infiltration testing, we plan to drill fourteen borings to depths ranging from approximately 3 to 50 feet below the existing ground surface (bgs) as conditions allow.

A Mobile Model B-53 drill rig, or similar, equipped with a 6-inch diameter hollow stem auger and an automatic trip hammer for sampling will be used to drill all the borings. As the exploratory borings are drilled, the soils will be classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D2488 17). Copies of these boring logs will be included in the geotechnical engineering and engineering geology report.

During drilling of the deeper exploratory borings, California sampler ring, standard penetrometer and bulk soil samples will be obtained for testing in the laboratory to determine physical properties such as in situ unit weight and moisture, maximum density and optimum moisture content, expansion index, consolidation/collapse, grain size analysis, corrosivity, and shear strength. The final determination of the number and types of tests to be performed will depend upon the subsurface conditions encountered.

A perforated polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe will be placed within and near the center of the infiltration test borings and the annular spaces around the PVC pipe will be backfilled with gravel. The infiltration testing would then be completed in general accordance with the “Shallow, Quick” methodology. The results of the infiltration tests will be presented in the geotechnical engineering and engineering geology report for use by other engineers in evaluating site suitability for effluent disposal.

The field and laboratory data will be reviewed by a Registered Professional Engineer and an Engineering Geologist both licensed by the State of California and evaluated with respect to development of preliminary geotechnical and geologic criteria for site development. The following items will be addressed or included in the geotechnical engineering and engineering geology report:
• Site geologic conditions
• Soil and groundwater conditions encountered
• Infiltration test results
• Preparation of improvement areas prior to construction • Grading and backfill criteria for the structures and improvements • Suitability of the site soils for use as fill and backfill • Types and depths of foundation systems
• Maximum allowable bearing capacities
• Ultimate lateral capacities
• Site seismicity
• CBC seismic design criteria
108
Rev 9/15
• Potential for liquefaction and seismically induced settlement • Total and differential settlement
• Site drainage around improvements
The geotechnical engineering and engineering geology report and recommendations will be intended to comply with the considerations of the current California Building Code (CBC) and common geotechnical engineering and engineering geology practice.

Floodplain Analysis: This intent of this task is to provide a preliminary floodplain analysis to establish an approximate 100-year Water Surface Elevation (WSE) at the WWTP. The current FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map for the Salinas River includes only an Approximate Zone A Floodplain and has no Base Flood Elevations (BFE) shown. A BFE is needed to determine which areas of the WWTP site are subject to flooding during a 100-year event. The identification of the BFE will determine which areas of the WWTP site that will need to be elevated and/or protected by a levee or floodwall.

The scope of work will include four parts:

1. Initial review of flooding information in the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) and Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and other sources provided by the City, coordination with FEMA to obtain original computer models and a WWTP site visit.

2. Review of original effective models obtained from FEMA for the FIS and FIRM to determine BFE.

3. Development of a limited and preliminary HEC-RAS model for the stream length near the WWTP to determine WSE impacts of the current and proposed disposal field levees located in the floodplain.

4. Development of a letter report summarizing the preliminary floodplain analysis findings including the BFE near the WWTP and the impacts to the BFE that result from the disposal field levees on the floodplain.

The work will include contacting FEMA to obtain previous HEC-1 models (the effective models) for the section of the Salinas River near the WWTP. This information will be reviewed to identify the WSE previously calculated in the model. Advanced Hydro Engineering (AHE) will perform a site visit to review conditions at the WWTP.

A second preliminary HEC-RAS model will be developed for the river channel area near the treatment plant and disposal fields. This model will use topography of the creek presumed available from the City or other sources. The second HEC-RAS model will be used to determine the WSE impact of the river cross section reduction created by the existing levee surrounding the disposal field. The addition of the new spray fields on the floodplain will further reduce the cross sectional flow area of the river. The impact on the WSE of the reduction in river flow area will also be reviewed using the preliminary HEC-RAS model.

Only hydrology developed from the FEMA floodplain study will be used in the analysis. Any differing hydrology values or modifications included in other sources will be noted.

After receipt of modeling information from FEMA, AHE will review the effective HEC-1 model and identify the effective WSE at the WWTP based on current effective model results. This WSE is presumed to have been used for the previous floodplain structure elevations. 109
Rev 9/15
Based on the information collected, AHE will develop a new limited length HEC-RAS model of the river channel near the WWTP and spray fields. This model will include a few cross sections upstream and a few cross sections downstream of the spray fields. One or two cross sections will be placed through the existing/new field site. The model will be used to simulate the existing disposal area levees and the proposed disposal area levees. AHE will perform a simulation with the added cross sections to represent floodplain with proposed modifications.

AHE will develop a letter report summarizing the HEC-1 modeling and simulations regarding the HEC-RAS modeling. This will include comparison of the WSE in the existing effective conditions HEC-1 model and the proposed conditions HEC-RAS model.

The results of the HEC-RAS modeling effort are expected to require the City to prepare a Conditional Letter of Map Revision – Fill (CLOMR-F). This approach is a conditional approval of a proposed project that will create a LOMR condition when it is completed. The designation F represents the proposed fill of the WWTP site. The fill designation will represent only the levee around the spray field site, which is filling in a portion of the floodplain cross section. After the project is constructed, the LOMR-F will be submitted (and approved) based on the completed project, since the CLOMR-F for the project has already been approved. In construction terms, the CLOMR-F is the approved plan set and the LOMR-F is the record drawing that matches the approved plan.

The overall approach is:

1. Perform the study and identify flood levels

2. Apply for CLOMR-F based on study results

3. FEMA review (60 days)

4. FEMA approval for CLOMR-F

5. Build project

6. Apply for LOMR-F based on completed project

7. Approval by FEMA of LOMR-F for the project
Influent Water Quality Sampling and Analysis: HydroScience will review available influent water quality in an attempt to characterize the existing influent. The City has indicated that additional water quality data may be needed to fully characterize the influent for the purpose of designing the project.

HydroScience will determine what data gaps may exist and prepare a recommended sampling regimen to increase the amount of data available to characterize wastewater influent. Based on this analysis, HydroScience will recommend additional influent water quality sampling and work with the City for sample collection, analysis, and analysis. HydroScience has budget for the laboratory sample collection and analysis. It is expected that the wastewater operator, FRM, will assist in the sample point identification and sample collection.

Preliminary Design Report: HydroScience shall prepare a Preliminary Design Report (PDR) summarizing the basis of design for the entire Project as defined in the Project Description in this section.

The PDR will identify design criteria for the WWTP and discuss how the proposed treatment system will meet the effluent limitations in the WDR. Design, operating and performance criteria 110
Rev 9/15
for system components shall include recommended equipment type, materials of construction, operating conditions, quantity/configuration, loading rates, motor/drive information, process design data, and estimated motor loads. Design criteria for individual system components will be summarized in tables. The PDR shall clearly describe which system components and ancillary facilities will be included in the package treatment plant documents for the treatment plant.

Technical elements to be included in the PDR will also include:
• Process flow diagram
• Hydraulic profile
• Summary of geotechnical report
• Process and instrumentation diagrams
• Overall site and yard piping plan showing a plan view layout of all major components • Methods and level of remote monitoring and control desired by City staff via the SCADA system and coordinating radio survey or fiber optic.
• Process reliability and control features
• Conceptual layout for operations building/maintenance building • Engineer’s opinion of probable cost
• Preliminary construction schedule
• Sheet index
• List of specifications
The Draft PDR will also identify whether it is preferred to have the City prepurchase or prenegotiate for the packaged treatment plant equipment, including the MBR, UV, and sludge dewatering unit processes. As part of the PDR, HydroScience will also help determine whether or not the UV disinfection equipment needs to be installed as part of the WWTP Upgrade, and how and if the sludge dewatering equipment construction can be accelerated. This step can provide cost benefits if the unit process is proprietary, specialized, or not available with significant competitors. Additional information about the procurement method and strategy are found in Task 4.

The Draft PDR shall be submitted to the City in PDF form. Following a meeting with the City, HydroScience will incorporate comments on the Draft PDR into a Final PDR that will be used as the basis for detailed design.

Recycled Water Planning: The WWTP Master Plan identified potential recycled water users in and around the WWTP and the City. Although the Master Plan stated that the recycled water distribution system was located to primarily offset potable water demands, the majority of the demands identified are not currently supplied by the City’s potable water distribution system.

The City is supplied entirely from groundwater, and opportunities to reduce local groundwater pumping would be expected to have a long-term benefit on groundwater supply availability for the City’s wells.

As an alternate approach, HydroScience will evaluate the cost and feasibility of producing disinfected tertiary recycled water and storing this recycled water in the existing aerated ponds.

To produce disinfected tertiary recycled water, a disinfection process using either UV disinfection or chlorination would be required. HydroScience will evaluate the feasibility of each disinfection process and include options for each in the overall site plan included in the PDR.
111
Rev 9/15
The disinfected tertiary recycled water would be stored on-site seasonally and diurnally prior to pumping to the distribution system. HydroScience will evaluate the feasibility of using the existing aerated ponds for recycled water storage. It would be preferred to utilize the existing ponds for storage in lieu of new at grade tanks to reduce capital costs. Should the ponds be unable to be used for storage, on-site tanks for recycled water storage will be included as an alternate.

The delivery of recycled water is assumed to originate from the on-site pond or tank. It is assumed recycled water will be supplied from a pump station and supplied to agricultural and landscape irrigation customers in the general vicinity of the wastewater treatment plant to the east of the City. A target distribution area roughly bordered by the City limits to the west, the river to the east, Elm Avenue to the south, and Pine Avenue to the north will be targeted.

HydroScience will work with the City to investigate the feasibility of using recycled water for agricultural irrigation in this area, and reach out to selected customers, with City assistance, to determine their interest in receiving recycled water from the City.

A draft Recycled Water Feasibility Study will be prepared to evaluate how the City would distribute recycled water. The Feasibility Study will be a section of the PDR and will be included in that submittal.

Deliverables
• Boundary Survey: DWG, PDF
• PDR: Draft and Final in PDF and Word formats, four bound hard copies • Geotechnical Investigation: PDF
• Floodplain Analysis Report: PDF
Task 2 – Engineering Support for Financing and Environmental Review Environmental Review:

The PDR will form the basis for development of the project description for the CEQA documentation. As the CEQA process moves forward, it is expected that the CEQA consultant will require input from HydroScience on anticipated means and methods of construction, proposed mitigation measures, and related content to include in the CEQA document.

HydroScience has included time for our project staff to respond to these inquiries and provide technical information required for the CEQA consultant to complete their work.

HydroScience will also review the Administrative Draft of the CEQA document, provide responses back to the City, and help respond to questions and comments from the public on the NOP and draft CEQA document.

SRF Funding Support: Assuming that the WWTP Upgrade Project will be funded through the CWSRF program, an Application Package will be prepared to secure funding which includes:
• General Information Package
• Technical Package
• Environmental Package
112
Rev 9/15
• Financial Security Package
• Final Budget Approval Package
HydroScience will take the lead in preparing the five CWSRF technical packages with support from the City and its consultants. Some information in the packages, particularly in the Environmental, Financial Security, and Final Budget Approval package, will be required to originate from the City and its consultants. HydroScience will also be responsible for coordination of the development of the packages with different parties at the City, and coordination of the review and development of the packages with the SWRCB.

It is expected that multiple coordination meetings with SWRCB DFA staff will be required to coordinate review and approval of the packages. HydroScience has included an allowance for time to coordinate with the SWRCB, answer questions, and be proactive in communications.

Stormwater Permitting: Because the City has a waiver from the MS4 stormwater permitting requirements, there are no stormwater permitting requirements for work in the City of Greenfield. However, compliance with the Construction General Permit (CGP) is required for projects over an acre in size. Compliance with the Industrial General Permit (IGP) is required for projects with a capacity of 1 MGD of more.

HydroScience will prepare the required documentation and work with the LGP from the City to apply for compliance with the CGP and IGP through SMARTS.

Deliverables
• Responses to inquiries from CEQA Consultant
• Review of Administrative Draft of the CEQA document
• Response to questions from public on NOP and Draft CEQA document • Technical information in support of CWSRF Package preparation • Stormwater permitting documentation for the CGP and IGP Task 3 – Permitting Support
HydroScience will provide technical support for the permits that are expected to be required to complete the WWTP Upgrade Project.

City: It is expected that the two new occupied buildings to be constructed as part of the WWTP Upgrade Project will require a City Building Permit. The City shall be responsible for any fees or costs associated with its labor to review the plans/application or fees to issue the permit.

The 90% and 100% PS&E developed for Task 4 will be used to apply for the building permit.

HydroScience’s intent is to submit the same plans to the City, and a cover sheet summarizing the plan sheets that are applicable to the building permit application.

RWQCB: HydroScience will provide technical support to the City and its permitting consultant for the permitting of the WWTP Upgrade. It is expected that technical information from the Preliminary Design Report and the Detailed Design will be summarized by HydroScience as appropriate for use by the City and its permitting consultant to support any required permitting for the WWTP Upgrade. The schedules for project implementation identified in the PDR are expected to be utilized as a basis for the development of a Time Schedule Order, which is expected to be submitted in March 2023.
113
Rev 9/15
Time Schedule Order: HydroScience will prepare a Time Schedule Compliance Plan that includes the justification and request for additional time to achieve compliance with the effluent limitations (Tables 3 through 7 of the General Permit). This document will be prepared in accordance with Section 13300 of the Water Code and is expected to be submitted to the RWQCB during the first quarter of 2023.

HydroScience will review the Administrative Draft of the Time Schedule Order, if offered by the RWQCB, for items of concern to the City. We will prepare comments for consideration by the City and RWQCB and consult with the City on next steps. It is expected that, should it be required, we will consult with the City’s attorney as required.

Once the TSO is issued, it is likely that the TSO will require the City to submit progress reports detailing the City’s progress towards full compliance with the effluent limitations. Our expectation is that HydroScience will provide technical information that the City can use to formally respond back to the RWQCB quarterly and/or as required or requested by the RWQCB.

Report of Waste Discharge: Based on the expectation that the WWTP Upgrade will be covered under the same effluent limitations as the General Order that is already adopted, HydroScience will provide the following services associated with preparing a Report of Waste Discharge:
• Prepare a process description for the existing and WWTP Upgrade Project, including a site map, schematics for both the liquids and solids treatment facilities, and a description of how the existing plant will be utilized after the WWTP Upgrade project is completed.

We will also summarize the facility changes, and calculate the available remaining capacity the City has following completion of the WWTP Upgrade Project. • Identify proposed monitoring and reporting program changes, specifically the locations for monitoring influent and effluent and how those will change following completion of the WWTP Upgrade Project.
• Summarize the expected effluent water quality of the new treatment process and compare it to the adopted effluent limitations. This will also include a comparison to existing effluent water quality data submitted previously to the RWQCB as part of the selfmonitoring reports. • It is not expected that completion of a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation or Reasonable Potential Analysis is required, since the project is not expected to change the effluent limitations contained in the General Order.

HydroScience will prepare the RWD Documentation, including the Form 200 and cover letter, for the City to transmit to the RWQCB. HydroScience will prepare the water balance that can be included in the RWD. HydroScience will review the draft Notice of Applicability (NOA) generated by the CCRWQCB and provide comments.

PG&E: HydroScience will prepare the PG&E Service Application for the WWTP Upgrade. The service application will be based on the expected loads and requirements associated with the Project. HydroScience will work with PG&E to place the electrical service and transformer in accordance with their requirements. HydroScience will regularly coordinate with PG&E as the application is processed and during construction. HydroScience will outreach to PG&E at the beginning of the project to establish requirements, timelines, and brief them on the project. 114
Rev 9/15
HydroScience will submit the application with the required finalized site plan, single line, and load table. HydroScience will include requirements in the contract documents for the sequencing, timing, and coordination of PG&E installation.

The electrical service design on the utility end will ultimately be designed by the utility. The City will pay any necessary fees for the new electrical service.

SWPPP: HydroScience will identify the project specific requirements for a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the project. It will be the responsibility of the Contractor to prepare to obtain the WDID number for the Project. Permit conditions and requirements pertaining to contractor responsibilities will be included into the Specifications.

Deliverables
• City permit applications
• Meeting agenda and minutes
• TSO justification
• TSO Progress Reports
• RWD, Form 200, and Cover Letter for the WWTP Upgrade Project • PG&E service application package, draft and final (PDF) • Project-specific Sediment Control Plan for inclusion in the SWPPP (PDF). The SWPPP will be prepared by others.

Task 4 – Detailed Design
It is expected that this project will be constructed as two separate construction packages – one focused on developing a solution for WAS pumping and solids dewatering prior to the construction of the remainder of the WWTP Upgrade, and the other covering the remainder of the WWTP Upgrade.

Sludge Dewatering: For the WAS pumping and solids dewatering project, it is expected that the project design for this element will be fast tracked and located in the ultimate location where solids dewatering will be within the WWTP Upgrade project. However, WAS will be pumped from the digester for an interim period instead of from the MBR tanks. For this design, HydroScience will prepare a 90% PS&E followed by a 100%/Final PS&E. All work performed by HydroScience will be prepared in accordance with CWSRF requirements. HydroScience will structure project implementation in a manner that will assist the City in the ability to fund the overall WWTP Upgrade project. HydroScience expects to have multiple discussions with the SWRCB, DFA to discuss funding options for this project element.

WWTP Upgrade: For the WWTP Upgrade, the PDR/30% Design Submittal will be used as the basis for a path forward, including the preparation of the CEQA document, the packaged wastewater treatment vendor RFP, and the submittals associated with the Detailed Design phase.

We anticipate submitting plans, specifications, and a cost estimate (PS&E) at the 50%, 90%, and bid set levels of completion.

The 50% PS&E will be used as a checkpoint to confirm project details, begin integrating elements of the selected prepackaged vendor into the overall design, and confirm the overall project intent following selection of the prepackaged vendor. At the 50% level, the list of 115
Rev 9/15
specifications will be updated, and the drawings completed as indicated in the Sheet List and List of Specifications included in this proposal. Drawings will be prepared using the City’s standard border in HydroScience standard AutoCAD format. Technical specifications will be prepared using HydroScience’s specification standards. The front end specifications will be developed using the City’s standard front-end contract documents. Comments received from the City following the submittal of the 50% PS&E will be incorporated into the 90% PS&E. A response to comments table will be completed, and the decision log updated.

The 90% PS&E will contain complete drawings, including plans, sections, and details for all disciplines. This package will incorporate City comments on the 50% submittal, reflect our coordination efforts with the preselected treatment plant vendor, and will include all anticipated drawings and specifications identified in HydroScience’s Sheet List and List of Specifications.

At this stage, the buildings, permitting, technical content, and approach to advertisement is expected to be finalized. The Engineer’s opinion of probable cost will also be updated.

The 100%/Bid Set PS&E will incorporate all comments from the 90% and be stamped and ready for advertisement. The contract documents will include the following:
• Wet stamped and signed final drawings in half and full size formats. We anticipate submitting reproducible loose hard copies and electronic copies in PDF/DWG formats. • Special provisions, bid schedule, and technical specifications with stamped title page suitable for advertisement, plus PDF and Word sets
• Updated construction cost estimate
• Reference electronic files for the project, including utility information, geotechnical information, and other associated project information. These will be transmitted by file sharing through the Cloud or via a USB drive.

Treatment Plant Procurement RFP: HydroScience will prepare procurement documents, technical specifications, and preliminary design drawings for the proposed packaged wastewater facility improvements. The packaged treatment system scope of supply will include the membrane bioreactor, UV disinfection, and the sludge dewatering unit processes.

In coordination with the City, HydroScience will recommend a strategy to optimize procurement of this system in coordination with the City’s best interest and SRF funding requirements.

Pre-selection of the treatment system vendor is intended to allow shop drawings, equipment configuration, equipment capacities, and contract pricing to be provided within a future, separate solicitation for construction improvements, including purchase, installation, and startup of the vendor’s equipment. Selection will follow “best value” criteria which includes technical qualifications, purchase price, life cycle cost, warranties, and proposed schedule.

The selected vendor will be expected to provide items as described in this RFP prior to finalization of design drawings by HydroScience. The selected vendor will contract with the construction general contractor selected by the City for final execution of the construction work.

The construction general contractor will be determined by publicly soliciting bids for the construction of the WWTP Project following completion of the detail design.

HydroScience will work with the City to solicit potential bidders, structure the RFP(s) to maximize bidder options while meeting the City’s overall interests, and coordinate the review and selection of treatment vendors in coordination with the City. Prior to firming up the 116
Rev 9/15
procurement strategy and developing the RFP, HydroScience will meet with CWSRF to discuss the procurement approach and gather CWSRF requirements that need to be reflected in the procurement documents.

Deliverables
• 50% PS&E: One full-size and two half size hard copies of the plans, plus PDFs of the drawings, specifications, schedule, and cost estimate.
• 90% PS&E: One full-size and two half size hard copies of the plans, plus PDFs of the drawings, specifications, schedule, and cost estimate.
• 100% PS&E: One full-size and two half size hard copies of the plans, plus PDFs of the drawings, specifications, schedule, and cost estimate. All electronic files will also be transmitted to the City in their native format (AutoCAD, Excel, Word) • Treatment Plant Procurement RFP (draft and final, PDF), meeting and vendor coordination, and selection recommendation memorandum.

Task 5 – Engineering Support During the Bidding Phase
HydroScience will support the City during the bid and construction phases. Work associated with this task is expected to occur both during the bidding of the Solids Dewatering and for the WWTP Upgrade contracts. It is assumed the City will lead the effort to advertise the job, distribute plans, and field inquiries from Contractors.

HydroScience will provide the following types of bid period services to the City:
• HydroScience will attend the pre-bid meeting and provide any technical support required to respond to technical questions from prospective bidders submitted during the bidding phase.
• Bidding services will include responding to questions posed by the bidders and preparing clarifications and up to two addenda. All communications with potential bidders will be coordinated through proper channels.
• HydroScience will provide support with receiving bids, analyzing bids, determining responsive responsible bidders, and presenting a recommendation to the City. • Following receipt of bids, HydroScience will make a recommendation on how to proceed and help coordinate acceptance of the bid with anticipated financing requirements and the City’s requirements.
• Assisting the City in contracting with the selected bidder.

Task 6 – Engineering Support during the Construction Phase HydroScience will provide Engineering Services During Construction (ESDC) to the City as needed and requested up to the level of effort identified in this scope. Work associated with this task is expected to occur both during the bidding of the Solids Dewatering and for the WWTP Upgrade contracts.

The types of services HydroScience expects to provide as part of this task is summarized below. 117
Rev 9/15
• Attending construction meetings: HydroScience expects that the ESDC staff will attend up to ten construction meetings. The timing of these meetings would be set as directed by the City and the Contractor.
• Site visits: HydroScience will make up to twenty site visits during construction. These construction site visits are in addition to the construction meetings. Site visits may occur in conjunction with a construction meeting.
• Submittal reviews: HydroScience will review submittals and resubmittals and provide comments back to the Contractor in coordination with the City’s Construction Manager.

Submittal reviews will be transmitted in the cloud-based software format preferred by the Contractor. HydroScience is estimating up to 150 submittals or resubmittals (estimated at 1380 hrs).
• RFI reviews: HydroScience will review RFIs and provide responses back to the Contractor in coordination with the City’s Construction Manager for RFI reviews. RFIs may address changed conditions, corrective actions, or items requested by the City or Contractor. Completed RFI reviews will be returned to the CM and/or the City in the same format as submittals. HydroScience has assumed up to 60 RFIs (estimated at 472 hrs).
• Change Order Reviews: Any change orders will be reviewed against field conditions and the contract documents to determine the validity of the change order request.

HydroScience will review change orders and provide a response/recommendation to the City. HydroScience is estimating approximately 10 potential change orders (estimated at 168 hrs).

Deliverables
• Responses to bidder inquiries
• Up to two addenda
• Documentation of pre-bid meeting agenda and notes
• Review of project bids
• Meeting agenda/minutes for HydroScience led meetings
• Submittal responses
• RFI responses
• Responses to Change Order requests
Task 7– Project Management
HydroScience will manage the project with an emphasis on diligence, tracking and verification, efficiency, effective communication, management of budget, and delay avoidance. Project Manager Curtis Lam will leverage his history of managing similar package MBR wastewater projects to foresee and collaboratively address challenges before they impact schedule or budget.

Elements of our project management efforts will include:

Schedule: HydroScience will produce a master project schedule at the project outset, and then update the project schedule as needed as the project moves forward. Efforts and decisions by the project team and how they impact schedule will be analyzed by HydroScience.

Project meetings: Curtis will conduct bi-weekly virtual meetings with the City to coordinate project activities throughout the project. It is expected that there will be approximately 30 118
Rev 9/15
meetings during the design phase. During the bidding and construction phase, meetings are expected to be led by the City’s Construction Manager with support from HydroScience.

We will boil down communications to key issues by doing our homework first and communicating in a concise and focused manner. An in-person workshop format will be used to communicate with the City at key milestones and solicit input. Every workshop will include handouts and visual aids to move quickly through the presentation portion, fully inform the City and encourage productive discussion. Agendas will be prepared for all meetings and distributed in advance, and minutes distributed within three days of every meeting.

It is expected that key milestones will include the following. • PDR/30% PS&E
• Recycled Water/UV Decision Point
• Preparation of the Prepackaged MBR/ Sludge Dewatering/UV RFP • Execution/negotiation of the funding agreement with the State • Solids Dewatering PS&E review
• 50% PS&E
• Buildings layout coordination
• TSO and RWD coordination with the RWQCB
• CEQA coordination with City’s consultants
• 90% PS&E
• 100% PS&E
QA/QC: All deliverables will be reviewed by our QA/QC Lead, Bill Slenter, prior to delivery to the City. As part of our QA/QC process, we will maintain a log of activities with sign off by the appropriate designer and QA/QC individual that all comments have been addressed.

Decision log: A decision log will be regularly updated to document key decisions as they are made. The decision log will be referenced during every design decision to ensure that City comments are addressed.

Monthly invoices: Invoices will be summarized by task number and will show the total task budget, amount billed each month, and task budget balance. Monthly progress reports will include the current project status, schedule, obstacles, and estimated work remaining to complete the project.

Deliverables
• Monthly invoices with progress reports
• Meeting agenda and minutes
• Decision tracking log
• Schedule updates
Assumptions and Exclusions

1. Improvements to the Rapid Infiltration Basins are being designed by others.

2. City will provide available as-built drawings for the WWTP.

3. All effluent disposal systems (leach/spray/reuse) will be designed by others.

4. Recycled water distribution system infrastructure can be incorporated into the design as part of a separate scope.
119
Rev 9/15

5. The design of power supply to the WWTP will be the responsibility of PG&E.

HydroScience will coordinate loads and project details with PG&E and represent the City from a technical standpoint in its efforts. HydroScience’s electrical design scope begins on the secondary side of the transformer and includes locating the transformer pad per PG&E requirements.

6. Environmental clearance and permitting will be completed by others

7. It is assumed that no new easements or real estate will be required to construct the project.

8. Operation and performance of the existing WWTP will be by others.

9. It is not expected that any additional right-of-way needs to be required to construct the project.

10. The WDR obtained by the City is assumed to contain the effluent limitations the WWTP needs to be designed to comply with.

11. The effective HEC-RAS available model represents current flow conditions in the Salinas River and will be adequate to calculate current WSE conditions, including the area near the WWTP.

12. The model HEC-1 simulation of existing conditions matches the FIRM.

13. All routing of flow will be along the 1-D direction of channel flow, with no separate routing of overbank flows.

14. Raising of site for flood protection is assumed to be limited to no more than x ft of raising and will not involve a special earthwork bid package (i.e. preloading).

15. CEQA document preparation by others.

16. The approved design elements in an intermediate design submittal will not be changed by the City subsequent to approval. Comments on subsequent phases will be generally limited to the detail added in that design phase.
120
Rev 9/15

EXHIBIT B

PAYMENT SCHEDULE
The budget for each task is summarized below.

Task 1 – Preliminary Design Report/30% PS&E $816,333
Task 2 – Engineering Support for Financing/Environmental Review $138,582 Task 3 – Permitting Support $131,866
Task 4 – Detailed Design $1,456,682
Task 5 – Engineering Services During Bidding Phases $63,290 Task 6 – Engineering Services During Construction Phases $983,874 Task 7 – Project Management $213,434
Project Subtotal $3,805,060
Contingency (10%) $380,506
Overall Budget $4,185,566
All work during the 2022 and 2023 calendar years shall be performed in accordance with the following billing rate schedule. Payments will be made to the Consultant monthly based on a time and materials billings up to the not-to-exceed amount in the Contract.

Standard Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates – 2022 and 2023 Principal $283
Engineer IX $273
Engineer VIII $263
Engineer VII $247
Engineer VI $237
Engineer V $227
Engineer IV $216
Engineer III $201
Engineer II $191
Engineer I $175
Construction Professional $134 to $185
CAD Manager $149
CAD Designer $129
Administrative $88 to $103
For calendar years after 2023, Consultant reserves the right to adjust their hourly billing rates, not to exceed 5%/year.
121
Rev 12/13 24

EXHIBIT C

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
The following coverages will be provided by Consultant and maintained on behalf of the City and in accordance with the requirements set forth herein.

Commercial General Liability/Umbrella. Primary insurance shall be at least as broad as ISO-CGL form No. CG 00 01 or equivalent form, as determined by Risk Management staff.

Total limits shall be no less than $2,000,000.00 per occurrence for all coverages and $2,000,000.00 general aggregate. City and its employees and agents shall be added as additional insureds using ISO additional insured endorsement form CG 20 10, or equivalent form, as determined by Risk Management staff (in no event will City accept an endorsement form with an edition date later than 1990). Coverage shall apply on a primary non-contributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance, primary or excess, available to City or any employee or agent of City. Coverage shall not be limited to the vicarious liability or supervisory role of any additional insured.

Umbrella Liability Insurance (if necessary to meet limits requirements) shall apply to bodily injury/property damage, personal injury/advertising injury, at a minimum, and shall include a “drop down” provision providing primary coverage above a maximum $25,000.00 self-insured retention for liability not covered by primary policies but covered by the umbrella policy. Coverage shall be following form to any underlying coverage. Coverage shall be provided on a “pay on behalf” basis, with defense costs payable in addition to policy limits.

There shall be no cross liability exclusion. Policies shall have concurrent starting and ending dates.

Business Auto/Umbrella Liability Insurance. Primary coverage shall be at least as broad as ISO Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 including symbol 1 (Any Auto). Limits shall be no less than $1,000,000.00 per accident. Starting and ending dates shall be concurrent. If Consultant owns no autos, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable.

Workers' Compensation/Employer's Liability shall be written on a policy form providing workers' compensation statutory benefits as required by law. Employer's liability limits shall be no less than $1,000,000 per accident or disease. Employer's liability coverage shall be scheduled under any umbrella policy described above. Unless otherwise agreed, this policy shall be endorsed to waive any right of subrogation as respect to the City, its employees or agents.

Professional Liability Insurance. Coverage shall be written on a policy form that provides professional liability insurance, errors and omissions or equivalent coverage appropriate to the Consultant's occupation or service. The policy limit shall be no less than $2,000,000.00 per claim and in the aggregate.

Consultant and City further agree as follows:

1. This Exhibit supersedes all other sections and provisions of this Agreement to the extent that any other section or provision conflicts with or impairs the provisions of this Exhibit. 122
Rev 12/13 25

2. Nothing contained in this Exhibit is to be construed as affecting or altering the legal status of the parties to this Agreement. The insurance requirements set forth in this Exhibit are intended to be separate and distinct from any other provision in this Agreement and shall be interpreted as such.

3. All insurance coverage and limits provided pursuant to this agreement shall apply to the full extent of the policies involved, available or applicable. Nothing contained in this Agreement or any other agreement relating to the City or its operations limits the application of such insurance coverage.

4. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this Exhibit are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only and is not intended by any party to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type.

5. For purposes of insurance coverage only, this Agreement will be deemed to have been executed immediately upon any party hereto taking any steps that can be deemed to be in furtherance of or towards, performance of this Agreement.

6. All general or auto liability insurance coverage provided pursuant to this Agreement, or any other agreements pertaining to the performance of this Agreement shall not prohibit Consultant, and Consultant's employees, or agents, from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives all rights of subrogation against City.

7. Unless otherwise approved by City, Consultant's insurance shall be written by insurers authorized to do business in the State of California and with a minimum “Best's” Insurance Guide rating of “A:VII+.” Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these insurance specifications.

8. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these requirements or is canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant.

9. Consultant agrees to provide evidence of the insurance required herein, satisfactory to City, consisting of certificate(s) of insurance evidencing all of the coverages required and an additional insured endorsement to Consultant's general liability and umbrella liability policies (if any) using ISO form CG 20 10 or equivalent form, as determined by Risk Management staff. Consultant shall also provide a waiver of subrogation endorsement to Consultant's workers' compensation policy applicable to the City. Certificate(s) are to reflect that the insurer will provide 30 days notice of any cancellation of coverage and all policies must be endorsed accordingly. Consultant agrees to require its insurer to modify such certificates to delete any exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation imposes no obligation and to delete the word "endeavor" with regard to any notice provisions. Consultant agrees to provide complete copies of policies to City upon request.

10. Consultant shall provide proof that policies of insurance required herein expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at 123
Rev 12/13 26
least the same coverage. Such proof will be furnished at least two weeks prior to the expiration of the coverages.

11. Consultant's insurance presented in compliance with these specifications shall not include self-insured retentions or deductibles unless declared to the City and approved by the City Manager. The City may require evidence of financial security if deductibles or self-insured are part of the Consultant's liability program.

12. Any actual or alleged failure on the part of City or any other additional insured under these requirements to obtain proof of insurance required under this Agreement or to inform Consultant of noncompliance with any insurance requirements in no way waives any right or remedy of City or any additional insured, in this or any other regard.

13. Consultant agrees to require all subconsultants or other parties hired for this project to provide general liability insurance naming as additional insureds all parties to this Agreement. Consultant agrees to obtain certificates evidencing such coverage and make reasonable efforts to ensure that such coverage is provided as required here. Consultant agrees to require that no contract used by any subconsultant or contracts Consultant enters into on behalf of City, will reserve the right to charge back to City the cost of insurance required by this agreement. Consultant agrees that upon request all agreements with subconsultants or others with whom Consultant contracts with on behalf of City, will be submitted to City for review. Failure of City to request copies of such agreement will not impose any liability on City, or its employees.

14. If Consultant is a Limited Liability Company, general liability coverage must be amended so that the Limited Liability Company and its Managers, Affiliates, employees, agents, and other persons necessary or incidental to its operation are insureds.

15. Consultant agrees to provide immediate notice to City of any claim or loss against Consultant that includes City as a defendant. City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve City.

16. It is agreed that insurance provided pursuant to these requirements will not be limited to coverage for the vicarious liability or supervisory role of any additional insured. All insurance coverage and limits provided are intended to apply to the full extent of the policies. Nothing contained in this agreement limits the application of such insurance coverage.
124
DATE: September 29, 2022
AGENDA DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
PREPARED BY: Jamie Tugel, PW Director
Douglas Pike PE, City Engineer

TITLE: A RESOLUTION APPROVING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT

MANAGEMENT SERVICES AS AN EXTENSION OF
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED BY NV5
IN THE AMOUNT OF $267,776.00 FOR THE APPLE AVE.

CONSOLIDATION PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE THIS CONTRACT

AND ASSIGN ADDITIONAL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH

THIS RESOLUTION

BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
The purpose of this State-funded project is to supply safe, clean City water to two areas served by contaminated shallow wells near the intersection of Apple Ave. and 13th Street.

These two areas are referred to as:

1. The Apple Avenue Water System # 3 (AAWS) owned by the Pete Rocha family, and

2. Six residences located in the County served by two wells that belong to the Mittlesteadt Family.

High levels of nitrate levels non-compliant with the drinking water standards were found in the two shallowwell private water systems.

The project has previously been accepted and approved for State Funding through the State Revolving Fund (SRF) Consolidation Program. A SRF Project Study Report was prepared which outlined preliminary scope, cost, geotechnical and water modeling in order to assure the project was warranted and would be successful.

Subsequently plans, Specifications and Engineer’s Estimates, and an EIR have previously been prepared.

A funding agreement with the State has been approved by the City Council on October 22, 2019 and has been executed by the City Manager in December 2021.

The improvements will include new waterline improvements in Apple Ave. and in 13th Street providing looped service to the area and service to these two areas. Water Services will be constructed, and water City Council Memorandum 599 El Camino Real Greenfield CA 93937 831-674-5591 www.ci.greenfield.ca.us
125
meters installed, providing metered service to residential units in these two areas. The attached three plan sheets show the improvements to be constructed.

NV5 was previously selected and hired by the City to bring the project to its current approved status. The original contract anticipated continued support by NV5 for the construction phase. Staff has requested NV5 provide a proposal to provide the following services: Project management and administration, design finalization, geotechnical support, bidding assistance, construction management and inspection, and SRF grant assistance (invoicing, etc.).

FINANCIAL AND BUDGET IMPACT
The project has previously been accepted and approved for State Funding through the State Revolving Fund (SRF) Consolidation Program. A SRF Project Study Report was prepared which outlined preliminary scope, cost, geotechnical and water modeling in order to assure the project was warranted and would be successful.

Subsequently plans, Specifications and Engineer’s Estimates, and an EIR have previously been prepared.

A funding agreement with the State has been approved by the City Council on October 22, 2019 and has been executed by the City Manager in December 2021.

The City will perform the work on a reimbursement basis. Invoicing is already authorized so work can be reimbursed as performed. The City will provide up=front payment for these services (pending reimbursement) from the Water Fund. Reimbursement requests can be submitted quarterly to the State, and payment is paid upon acceptance of the invoice.

The attached Agreement for services is in the amount of $267,776.00 will be the contract vehicle for amending and extending the previous contract with NV5.

The Standard City agreement allows for a 15% contingency allowance, or approximately $40,000.

RECOMMENDATION
City Staff recommend the City Council award a professional Services contract to NV5 for Project Management Services and appropriate funds for other services as required and authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute the contracts for these services. Staff also recommends that the Public Works Director and City Manager be authorized to assign staff, including the City Engineer, in accordance with City Purchasing Policy, to assist as required.

PROPOSED MOTION
I MOVE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2022-95, A RESOLUTION APPROVING

CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES AS AN EXTENSION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED BY NV5 IN THE AMOUNT OF $267,776.00 FOR THE APPLE AVE. CONSOLIDATION PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE THIS CONTRACT AND ASSIGN

ADDITIONAL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS RESOLUTION
126
127
128
129

CITY OF GREENFIELD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-95

A RESOLUTION APPROVING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT

SERVICES AS AN EXTENSION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED BY NV5 IN THE AMOUNT OF $267,776.00 FOR THE APPLE AVE.

CONSOLIDATION PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE THIS CONTRACT AND ASSIGN ADDITIONAL WORK

IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS RESOLUTION

WHEREAS, the City of Greenfield desires to construct the Apple Ave.

Consolidation Project (the "Project") which will extend City water service to the Rocha and Mittelsteadt properties on the west end of Apple Avenue that are currently served with contaminated private wells; and
WHEREAS, the City is financing the construction of the Project with moneys ("Project Funds") provided by the State of California, acting by and through the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board); and
WHEREAS, the City desires to extend contract services previously provided by NV5 (as the “Engineer of Record”) for the original contract under which NV5 provided services to Apple Ave. Water System No. 3 is Dated 9-10-2013. NV5 is a professional engineering firm with experience in State funded Water System Consolidation projects; and WHEREAS, the City has obtained an acceptable proposal from NV5 for the required services, and
WHEREAS, after a review of the submitted proposal, Staff is recommending the approval of a professional services contract with NV5 in the amount of $267,776.00; and

WHEREAS, additional extra services for project scope changes is provided for in the consultant agreement in the amount of 15% of the value of services or approximately $40,000; and WHEREAS, Staff also recommends that the Public Works Director and City Manager be authorized to assign support tasks to staff, including the City Engineer, or to other consultants as selected in accordance with City Purchasing Policy.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield that:

1. A professional services contract be awarded to NV5 for project management services in the amount of $267,776.00; and

2. That $40,000 be appropriated as a part of and included in the total budget for services for a contingency to allow for approved changes is scope of services or extra work; and 130

3. The City Manager is authorized to negotiate the final terms and conditions of the contracts authorized herein; and

4. The City Manager is authorized to execute said agreements on behalf of the City of Greenfield.

5. The City Manager and Public Works Director are authorized to assign support tasks to staff, including the City Engineer, or to other consultants as selected in accordance with City Purchasing Policy.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield, at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council held on the 11th day of October 2022, by the following vote:

AYES, and all in favor, therefore, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

_______________________________
Lance Walker, Mayor
Attest:
___________________________
Ann F. Rathbun, City Clerk
131
Rev 9/15

CITY OF GREENFIELD
AGREEMENT WITH NV5, Inc.

FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of October 11, 2022 between the City of Greenfield, a general law City and Municipal Corporation of the State of California ("City"), and NV5, Inc. ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on October 11, 2022 and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than December 31, 2025, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.

2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A.

3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant represents to the City that it has the qualifications necessary to perform the tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.

4. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed Two Hundred Sixty-Seven Thousand, Seven Hundred Seventy-Six Dollars ($267,776.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. Any terms or conditions set forth on Exhibit A or Exhibit B which do not describe the work to be performed, the payment rates and terms, or the payment schedule have not been agreed to by the City and shall not be deemed a part of this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Council or, if pursuant to its authority, the City Manager, or his or her designee. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager or the City’s representative and Consultant at the time City’s written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed 15% of the contract amount approved by City Council or $200,000 whichever is less. Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council. c. Consultant shall submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to 132
Rev 9/15
all nondisputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. d. Notwithstanding the above provisions, Consultant shall not be paid for any work performed until it has submitted to the City a fully completed and executed Internal Revenue Service Form W-9.

5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice of termination. City shall not be obligated to explain its reasons for termination. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement, such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3.

6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his or her delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.

7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities 133
Rev 9/15
related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys, notes, video and sound recordings, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant.

8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City.

9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.

Consultant agrees to provide insurance in accordance with the requirements set forth in Exhibit C. If consultant uses existing coverage to comply with these requirements and that coverage does not meet the requirements set forth herein, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the existing coverage to do so.

10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 134
Rev 9/15

11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section.

12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any person regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.

13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice:

To City: City of Greenfield
599 El Camino Real
Greenfield, California 93927
Attention: Jamie Tugel, Director of Public Works
To Consultant: NV5, Inc.
163 Technology Drive, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
Attention: Jeffrey M. Cooper, Vice President
135
Rev 9/15

14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement, only NV5, Inc. shall perform the services described in this Agreement. NV5, Inc may use assistants, under their direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this Agreement. Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of Jeffrey Cooper from Consultant's employ. Should he or she leave Consultant's employ, the city shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant.

15. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement.

16. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement.

17. LITIGATION. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Greenfield. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted.

18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.

19. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. 136
Rev 9/15
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written.

CONSULTANT CITY OF GREENFIELD
___________________________________ ________________________________ By: Date Paul Wood Date
Title: City Manager
Attest:
____________________________________ _________________________________ By: Date Ann Rathbun Date
Title: City Clerk
[Two signatures of corporate officers required] Approved As to Form:
_________________________________
City Attorney Date
137
Rev 9/15

EXHIBIT A

TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
138
Rev 9/15
139
Rev 9/15
140
Rev 9/15
141
Rev 9/15
142
Rev 9/15
143
Rev 9/15
144
Rev 9/15

EXHIBIT B

PAYMENT SCHEDULE
The budget for each task is summarized below.

Task 1A – Project Administration $19,805
Task 2A – Design Finalization $60,819
Task 2B – Geotech $33,780
Task 3A – Bidding Assistance $9,620
Task 4A – Construction Management and Inspection $138,022 Task 5A – Water supply Permit Amendment $5.730
Project Subtotal $267,776
Contingency (15%) $40,000
Overall Budget $307,776
All work during the 2022 and 2023 calendar years shall be performed in accordance with the following billing rate schedule. Payments will be made to the Consultant monthly based on a time and materials billings up to the not-to-exceed amount in the Contract.

Standard Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates – 2022 and 2023 PD $265
CM $185
Inspector (PW) $135
Assistant CM $150
Principal Geologist $245
Senior Geologist $170
Staff Geologist $125
Project Manager $240
Senior Engineer $175
Assistant Engineer $119
Project Assistant $85
For calendar years after 2023, Consultant reserves the right to adjust their hourly billing rates. 145
Rev 12/13 15

EXHIBIT C

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
The following coverages will be provided by Consultant and maintained on behalf of the City and in accordance with the requirements set forth herein.

Commercial General Liability/Umbrella. Primary insurance shall be at least as broad as ISO-CGL form No. CG 00 01 or equivalent form, as determined by Risk Management staff.

Total limits shall be no less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence for all coverages and $1,000,000.00 general aggregate. City and its employees and agents shall be added as additional insureds using ISO additional insured endorsement form CG 20 10, or equivalent form, as determined by Risk Management staff (in no event will City accept an endorsement form with an edition date later than 1990). Coverage shall apply on a primary non-contributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance, primary or excess, available to City or any employee or agent of City. Coverage shall not be limited to the vicarious liability or supervisory role of any additional insured.

Umbrella Liability Insurance (if necessary to meet limits requirements) shall apply to bodily injury/property damage, personal injury/advertising injury, at a minimum, and shall include a “drop down” provision providing primary coverage above a maximum $25,000.00 self-insured retention for liability not covered by primary policies but covered by the umbrella policy. Coverage shall be following form to any underlying coverage. Coverage shall be provided on a “pay on behalf” basis, with defense costs payable in addition to policy limits.

There shall be no cross liability exclusion. Policies shall have concurrent starting and ending dates.

Business Auto/Umbrella Liability Insurance. Primary coverage shall be at least as broad as ISO Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 including symbol 1 (Any Auto). Limits shall be no less than $1,000,000.00 per accident. Starting and ending dates shall be concurrent. If Consultant owns no autos, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable.

Workers' Compensation/Employer's Liability shall be written on a policy form providing workers' compensation statutory benefits as required by law. Employer's liability limits shall be no less than $1,000,000 per accident or disease. Employer's liability coverage shall be scheduled under any umbrella policy described above. Unless otherwise agreed, this policy shall be endorsed to waive any right of subrogation as respect to the City, its employees or agents.

Professional Liability Insurance. Coverage shall be written on a policy form that provides professional liability insurance, errors and omissions or equivalent coverage appropriate to the Consultant's occupation or service. The policy limit shall be no less than $1,000,000.00 per claim and in the aggregate.

Consultant and City further agree as follows:

1. This Exhibit supersedes all other sections and provisions of this Agreement to the extent that any other section or provision conflicts with or impairs the provisions of this Exhibit. 146
Rev 12/13 16

2. Nothing contained in this Exhibit is to be construed as affecting or altering the legal status of the parties to this Agreement. The insurance requirements set forth in this Exhibit are intended to be separate and distinct from any other provision in this Agreement and shall be interpreted as such.

3. All insurance coverage and limits provided pursuant to this agreement shall apply to the full extent of the policies involved, available or applicable. Nothing contained in this Agreement or any other agreement relating to the City or its operations limits the application of such insurance coverage.

4. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this Exhibit are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only and is not intended by any party to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type.

5. For purposes of insurance coverage only, this Agreement will be deemed to have been executed immediately upon any party hereto taking any steps that can be deemed to be in furtherance of or towards, performance of this Agreement.

6. All general or auto liability insurance coverage provided pursuant to this Agreement, or any other agreements pertaining to the performance of this Agreement shall not prohibit Consultant, and Consultant's employees, or agents, from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives all rights of subrogation against City.

7. Unless otherwise approved by City, Consultant's insurance shall be written by insurers authorized to do business in the State of California and with a minimum “Best's” Insurance Guide rating of “A:VII+.” Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these insurance specifications.

8. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these requirements or is canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant.

9. Consultant agrees to provide evidence of the insurance required herein, satisfactory to City, consisting of certificate(s) of insurance evidencing all of the coverages required and an additional insured endorsement to Consultant's general liability and umbrella liability policies (if any) using ISO form CG 20 10 or equivalent form, as determined by Risk Management staff. Consultant shall also provide a waiver of subrogation endorsement to Consultant's workers' compensation policy applicable to the City. Certificate(s) are to reflect that the insurer will provide 30 days notice of any cancellation of coverage and all policies must be endorsed accordingly. Consultant agrees to require its insurer to modify such certificates to delete any exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation imposes no obligation and to delete the word "endeavor" with regard to any notice provisions. Consultant agrees to provide complete copies of policies to City upon request.

10. Consultant shall provide proof that policies of insurance required herein expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at 147
Rev 12/13 17
least the same coverage. Such proof will be furnished at least two weeks prior to the expiration of the coverages.

11. Consultant's insurance presented in compliance with these specifications shall not include self-insured retentions or deductibles unless declared to the City and approved by the City Manager. The City may require evidence of financial security if deductibles or self-insured are part of the Consultant's liability program.

12. Any actual or alleged failure on the part of City or any other additional insured under these requirements to obtain proof of insurance required under this Agreement or to inform Consultant of noncompliance with any insurance requirements in no way waives any right or remedy of City or any additional insured, in this or any other regard.

13. Consultant agrees to require all subconsultants or other parties hired for this project to provide general liability insurance naming as additional insureds all parties to this Agreement. Consultant agrees to obtain certificates evidencing such coverage and make reasonable efforts to ensure that such coverage is provided as required here. Consultant agrees to require that no contract used by any subconsultant or contracts Consultant enters into on behalf of City, will reserve the right to charge back to City the cost of insurance required by this agreement. Consultant agrees that upon request all agreements with subconsultants or others with whom Consultant contracts with on behalf of City, will be submitted to City for review. Failure of City to request copies of such agreement will not impose any liability on City, or its employees.

14. If Consultant is a Limited Liability Company, general liability coverage must be amended so that the Limited Liability Company and its Managers, Affiliates, employees, agents, and other persons necessary or incidental to its operation are insureds.

15. Consultant agrees to provide immediate notice to City of any claim or loss against Consultant that includes City as a defendant. City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve City.

16. It is agreed that insurance provided pursuant to these requirements will not be limited to coverage for the vicarious liability or supervisory role of any additional insured. All insurance coverage and limits provided are intended to apply to the full extent of the policies. Nothing contained in this agreement limits the application of such insurance coverage.
148
MEMORANDUM: October 7, 2022
AGENDA DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jamie Tugel, Public Works Director

TITLE: PUBLIC WORKS EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL

APPROPRIATION AND EXTENSION OF CONTRACT FOR

WATER LEAK REPAIRS WITH GRADE BREAK ENGINEERING
IN THE AMOUNT OF $95,000
BACKGROUND:

On September 2, 2022, the City of Greenfield entered into a contract with Grade Break Engineering (GBE) for water system service repairs. This contract was entered into so the City could get caught up on water service repairs, with the intent the City staff would go back to conducting the repairs inhouse once GBE was complete. During the course of the work, more water service leaks were reported and some repairs were more extensive than originally planned for. GBE completed the water service repairs, and additional leaks are being reported daily. The number of leaks is more than staff can repair in house at this time.

Even though we have a budget in place for last fiscal year and this fiscal year, predicting leaks and breaks is not an exact practice and adjustments need to be made periodically. Public Works has faced many challenges, including the lack of full time staff and lack of proper training.

DISCUSSION:

During the course of the water service repairs, staff is working closely with the contractor to identify and track what type of leak repairs are being discovered, how they are being repaired, whether there is an issue with materials used, and if there is any trending. Staff has anticipated that by the end of this year, the City will be able to develop a plan moving forward on priority preventative maintenance necessary for the future. Staff is also utilizing the contractor’s expertise to assist in training City staff on proper methods of excavation and backfill.

City Council Memorandum
599 El Camino Real Greenfield CA 93927 (831) 674-5591
www.ci.greenfield.ca.us
149

BUDGET:

The funding for this emergency contract extension will be the Water Enterprise Fund.

PROPOSED MOTION:

I MOVE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION #2022-96, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD TO APPROVE AN EMERGENCY

SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION AND EXTENSION OF CONTRACT FOR WATER LEAK REPAIRS WITH GRADE BREAK ENGINEERING IN THE AMOUNT OF $95,000 150

CITY OF GREENFIELD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-96

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD TO

APPROVE AN EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION AND

EXTENSION OF CONTRACT FOR WATER LEAK REPAIRS WITH GRADE BREAK ENGINEERING IN THE AMOUNT OF $95,000
WHEREAS, on September 2, 2022, the City of Greenfield entered into a contract with Grade Break Engineering for water system service repairs; and WHEREAS, during the course of the work, more water service leaks were reported and some repairs were more extensive than originally planned for; and WHEREAS, the intent of contracting to get caught up on repairs is to go back to repairing leaks in house; and
WHEREAS, upon completion of the water service repairs, additional water leaks have been reported on a daily basis, which is more than staff is able to currently repair in house or in a timely manner; and
WHEREAS, the department faces many challenges, including lack of full-time staff and lack of proper training; and

WHEREAS, staff is working closely with the contractor to identify and track the water leaks to develop a plan by the end of the year on how to move forward on priority preventative maintenance necessary in the future.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield approves the emergency supplemental appropriation and extension of contract for water leak repairs with Grade Break Engineering in the amount of $95,000.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield at a public meeting of the City Council held on the 11th day of October 2022 by the following vote:

AYES, and all in favor, therefore, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

Lance Walker, Mayor
Attest:

Ann F. Rathbun, City Clerk
151
MEMORANDUM: October 7, 2022
AGENDA DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jamie Tugel, Public Works Director

TITLE: A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE REGIONAL FUNDING

AGREEMENT FOR PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE WAYFINDING

PROGRAM BETWEEN THE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY FOR

MONTEREY COUNTY AND THE CITY OF GREENFIELD
BACKGROUND:

On May 25, 2016, the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) Board of Directors adopted the Regional Pedestrian and Bicyclist Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County (Attachment 2) and authorized the submission of grant applications to implement the Wayfinding Plan. TAMC was awarded Local Transportation Funds and State SB1 Local Partnership Program funds in the amount of One Million Nine Hundred Thirty-one Thousand Dollars ($1,931,000) for the development and implementation of the Wayfinding Plan within TAMC’s jurisdictional boundaries. TAMC developed construction plans for the Regional Wayfinding Program Signs (Attachment 3) and is now preparing for construction. The Regional Wayfinding Program Signs proposes the installation of wayfinding signs on City streets, through an encroachment permit. The installation of these signs would be funded by TAMC. The City would agree to pay for costs related to this action, including the issuance of permits, and the maintenance and repair of wayfinding signage within its jurisdiction. The Regional Funding Agreement for Pedestrian and Bicycle Wayfinding Program (Attachment 1) delineates the obligations of both TAMC and the City with respect to the implementation of the Regional Pedestrian and Bicyclist Wayfinding Plan within the City of Greenfield.

City Council Memorandum
599 El Camino Real Greenfield CA 93927 (831) 674-5591
www.ci.greenfield.ca.us
152
DISCUSSION:

The installation of Regional Wayfinding Program Signs is intended to improve bicycle and pedestrian safety. This action aligns with the City Council goal to “Ensure a Healthy/Enriching Environment for All Greenfield Residents”.

BUDGET AND FINANCIAL IMPACT:

There is no direct cost to the City for the installation of the wayfinding signs. The installation of the signs would be funded by TAMC, and the City will incur staff time from the coordination of the program and permitting. Additional costs to the City will be incurred in on-going maintenance. There are 9 new signs that are proposed in Greenfield. Traffic signs typically need replacement every 7-10 years, due to damage, graffiti, theft, or loss in reflectivity.

PROPOSED MOTION:

I MOVE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION # 2022-97, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD APPROVING THE REGIONAL FUNDING

AGREEMENT FOR PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE WAYFINDING PROGRAM

BETWEEN THE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY FOR MONTEREY COUNTY AND THE CITY OF GREENFIELD.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
Attachment 1: Regional Funding Agreement for Pedestrian and Bicycle Wayfinding Attachment 2: Regional Pedestrian and Bicyclist Wayfinding Plan and Monterey County Attachment 3: Regional Wayfinding Program Signs COG
153

CITY OF GREENFIELD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-97

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

GREENFIELD APPROVING THE REGIONAL FUNDING AGREEMENT

FOR PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE WAYFINDING PROGRAM

BETWEEN THE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY FOR MONTEREY
COUNTY AND THE CITY OF GREENFIELD.

WHEREAS, On May 25, 2016, the Transportation Agency for Monterey County Board of Directors adopted the Regional Pedestrian and Bicyclist Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County and authorized submission of grant applications to implement the Wayfinding Plan; and
WHEREAS, The Transportation Agency for Monterey County developed construction plans for the Regional Wayfinding Program Signs and is now preparing for construction; and
WHEREAS, the installation of these signs would be funded by the Transportation Agency of Monterey County; and
WHEREAS, The City would agree to pay for costs related to this action, including the issuance of permits, and the maintenance and repair of wayfinding signage within its jurisdiction; and

WHEREAS, the Transportation Agency for Monterey County filed the Notice of Exemption on April 28, 2016; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield does hereby approves the Regional Funding Agreement for Pedestrian and Bicycle Wayfinding Program between the Transportation Agency of Monterey County and the City of Greenfield.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield at a public meeting of the City Council held on the 11th day of October 2022 by the following vote:

AYES, and all in favor, therefore, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

Lance Walker, Mayor
Attest:

Ann F. Rathbun, City Clerk
154

PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE WAYFINDING PROGRAM

REGIONAL FUNDING AGREEMENT
between the

TRANSPORTATION AGENCY FOR MONTEREY COUNTY
and the

CITY OF GREENFIELD
This Regional Funding Agreement for Pedestrian and Bicycle Wayfinding Program (“Agreement”) is effective the ______ of __________________, 2022, and is entered into by and between the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (“TAMC”) and the City of Greenfield (“RECIPIENT”).

RECITALS

1. On May 25, 2016, the TAMC Board of Directors adopted the Regional Pedestrian and Bicyclist Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County (“Wayfinding Plan”) and authorized the submission of grant applications to implement the Wayfinding Plan.

2. The Wayfinding Plan was determined to be exempt from CEQA under 14 CCR Section 15301: Existing Facilities, as affecting minor alterations to existing public structures and facilities.  All applicable statutes of limitations concerning the approval of the Wayfinding Plan under CEQA have been exhausted.

3. TAMC has been awarded Local Transportation Funds and State SB1 Local Partnership Program funds in the amount of One Million Nine Hundred Thirty‐one Thousand Dollars ($1,931,000) for the development and implementation of the Wayfinding Plan within TAMC’s jurisdictional boundaries.

4. RECIPIENT desires to improve bicycle and pedestrian safety within its jurisdiction, and concurrent with this Agreement, has also determined that TAMC’s Regional Pedestrian and Bicyclist Wayfinding Plan is one means to achieve that desire.

5. This Agreement delineates the obligations of the Parties to this Agreement with respect to the implementation of the Regional Pedestrian and Bicyclist Wayfinding Plan, adopted by the TAMC Board, within the jurisdiction of RECIPIENT.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between the Parties as follows:

Article I:

Covenants of Recipient

1.1.  Project Description.  The complete Project Description is specified in Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference.  The Project consists of the acceptance of Wayfinding signage, the identification of appropriate locations for Wayfinding signage and the installation and maintenance of such signage.
155
Wayfinding Regional Funding Agreement
City of Greenfield
https://tamcmonterey.sharepoint.com/Shared Documents/TAMC NEW/Projects and Programs/Regional Wayfinding/02_Design/02_Project Mgmt/Funding Agmts/Wayfinding Regional Funding Agmt ‐ Greenfield 2022 0919.docx PAGE 2 OF 10

1.2.  Change In Project Scope.  No change in the Project scope as described in Exhibit A may be approved or implemented until it has been reviewed and approved in writing by an amendment to this Agreement approved by the TAMC Board of Directors.

1.3.  Eligible Costs.  Eligible costs to be funded by TAMC pursuant to this Agreement are those related to the solicitation and award of one or more contract by TAMC for the manufacture and installation of Wayfinding signage approved by RECIPIENT, as set forth below.

RECIPIENT shall bear all costs related to Recipient’s actions related to this Agreement, including the issuance of permits, and the maintenance and repair of Wayfinding signage within its jurisdiction.

1.4.  Acceptance of Signage.  RECIPIENT hereby accepts the designs relative to the Wayfinding signage as shown in Exhibit “B,” and incorporated herein by this reference.

RECIPIENT shall allow the placement of at least 7 and up to 12 signs within its jurisdiction, generally at the locations designated in Exhibit “C,” and incorporated herein by this reference.

RECIPIENT agrees to work diligently and in good faith to provide and issue necessary permits for such signage at or near the designated locations, as physical conditions permit.

1.5.  Timing of Installation.  RECIPIENT shall permit and allow the installation of at least 9 signs within the first six (6) months after notification by TAMC.

1.6.  Maintenance and Repair.  RECIPIENT shall, at its cost, maintain the installed signage in good repair and visibility throughout the period of this Agreement.

Article II:

Covenants of TAMC

2.1.  TAMC shall develop, award and fund one or more contracts for the fabrication and installation of Wayfinding Signage in generally the following manner:

2.1.1.  A customized “Sign Topper” portion approved by RECIPIENT that incorporates agreed upon logos and color scheme that helps to establish a regional wayfinding brand.  A rendering of the Jurisdictional Sign Topper selected by RECIPIENT is shown as Exhibit B.

2.1.2.  A standardized “directional/distance” portion shared by all Wayfinding signage pursuant to the TAMC Pedestrian and Bicyclist Wayfinding Plan that assists a traveler in determining directions/distance to relevant locations.  A rendering of the Directional/ Distance signage is shown as Exhibit B.
156
Wayfinding Regional Funding Agreement
City of Greenfield
https://tamcmonterey.sharepoint.com/Shared Documents/TAMC NEW/Projects and Programs/Regional Wayfinding/02_Design/02_Project Mgmt/Funding Agmts/Wayfinding Regional Funding Agmt ‐ Greenfield 2022 0919.docx PAGE 3 OF 10

2.1.3.  Installation of Wayfinding Signage, suitable to the location and manner of installation of such Wayfinding signage.  Such installation may be by new post(s) or pole(s), or installation on an existing structure.

2.1.4.  In addition, a standardized “confirmation” portion shared by all Wayfinding signage pursuant to the TAMC Pedestrian and Bicyclist Wayfinding Plan that indicates travelers are on a designated regional route.  A rendering of the Confirmation signage is shown as Exhibit B.

2.2.  In entering into a contract for the fabrication and installation of Wayfinding Signage for RECIPIENT, TAMC shall call for the fabrication of one and one‐half (1.5) times the number of Jurisdictional Sign Toppers.  The additional Jurisdictional Sign Toppers above the number to be installed pursuant to this Agreement shall be directed to be delivered to RECIPIENT for use in RECIPIENT’s maintenance responsibilities.

Article III:

Mutual Covenants

3.1.  Term.  This Agreement shall remain in effect until discharged or terminated as provided in Section 3.2 or Section 3.15.

3.2.  Discharge/Termination.  This Agreement shall be subject to discharge as follows:

3.2.1.  Termination by Mutual Consent.  This Agreement may be terminated at any time by mutual consent of the Parties.  At the time of any such mutual termination, TAMC shall receive or retain any Jurisdictional Sign Toppers and standardized Directional signs which may be the subject of an executed contract as described in Section 2.1, but not yet installed.

3.2.2.  Discharge Upon Completion of Project.  Except as to any rights or obligations which survive discharge as specified in Section 3.14, this Agreement shall be discharged, and the Parties shall have no further obligation to each other, upon completion of the Project, which shall continue for a ten (10) year period after installation of the last Wayfinding Sign pursuant to this Agreement.

3.3.  Indemnity.  It is mutually understood and agreed that  RECIPIENT shall, to the full extent permitted by law, fully defend, indemnify and hold harmless TAMC, its Board and Directors, and any officer, agent, or employee of TAMC, against any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by RECIPIENT under the Agreement.  It is also fully understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, RECIPIENT shall fully defend, indemnify and hold TAMC, its Board and Directors, its officers, agency and employees, harmless from any liability imposed for injury as defined by Government Code Section 810.8 occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by RECIPIENT under this Agreement or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to RECIPIENT or funded by RECIPIENT under this Agreement. 157
Wayfinding Regional Funding Agreement
City of Greenfield
https://tamcmonterey.sharepoint.com/Shared Documents/TAMC NEW/Projects and Programs/Regional Wayfinding/02_Design/02_Project Mgmt/Funding Agmts/Wayfinding Regional Funding Agmt ‐ Greenfield 2022 0919.docx PAGE 4 OF 10

3.4.  Liability.  As TAMC is only acting with the approval of RECIPIENT with respect to the design, designated location and installation of Wayfinding signage herein identified, TAMC is not liable for any loss, cost, liability, damage, claim, lien, action, cause of action, demand or expense which may arise as a result of the acts or omissions of RECIPIENT or its agents, contractors, consultants, engineers, or representatives.  Nor shall TAMC be liable for any loss, cost, liability, damage, claim, lien, action, cause of action, demand or expense which may arise as a result of TAMC’s provision of funds or materials which may be utilized in, but not limited to the acquisition of, the design, implementation, or construction of the Project herein described.

3.5.  Notices.  Any notice which may be required under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be given by personal or electronic (delivery receipt enabled) service, or by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, to the addresses set forth below:

TAMC RECIPIENT
Todd A. Muck Jamie Tugel
Executive Director Public Works Director
55B Plaza Circle 920 Walnut Avenue
Salinas, California 93901 Greenfield, CA  93927
[email protected] [email protected]
Either Party may change its address by giving notice of such change to the other party in the manner provided in this Section 3.5.  All notices and other communications shall be deemed communicated as of actual receipt or after the second business day after deposit in the United States mail.

3.6.  Additional Acts and Documents.  Each Party agrees to do all such things and take all such actions, and to make, execute and deliver such other documents and instruments, as shall be reasonably requested to carry out the provisions, intent, and purpose of the Agreement.

3.7.  Integration.  This Agreement, together with the Pedestrian and Bicyclist Wayfinding Plan, represents the entire Agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof.

No representations, warranties, inducements, or oral agreements have been made by any of the Parties except as expressly set forth herein, or in other contemporaneous written agreements.

3.8.  Amendment.  This Agreement may not be changed, modified, or rescinded except in writing, signed by all Parties hereto, and any attempt at oral modification of this Agreement shall be void and of no effect.

3.9.  Independent Agency.  RECIPIENT renders its services under this Agreement as an independent agency and TAMC is also an independent agency under the Agreement.  None of 158
Wayfinding Regional Funding Agreement
City of Greenfield
https://tamcmonterey.sharepoint.com/Shared Documents/TAMC NEW/Projects and Programs/Regional Wayfinding/02_Design/02_Project Mgmt/Funding Agmts/Wayfinding Regional Funding Agmt ‐ Greenfield 2022 0919.docx PAGE 5 OF 10 the RECIPIENT's agents or employees shall be agents or employees of TAMC and none of TAMC’s agents or employees shall be agents or employees of RECIPIENT.

3.10.  Assignment.  The Agreement may not be assigned, transferred, hypothecated, or pledged by any Party without the express written consent of the other Party.

3.11.  Binding on Successors.  This Agreement shall be binding upon the successor(s), assignee(s) or transferee(s) of TAMC or RECIPIENT, as the case may be.  This provision shall not be construed as an authorization to assign, transfer, hypothecate or pledge this Agreement other than as provided above.

3.12.  Severability.  Should any part of this Agreement be determined to be unenforceable, invalid, or beyond the authority of either Party to enter into or carry out, such determination shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement which shall continue in full force and effect; provided that, the remainder of this Agreement can, absent the excised portion, be reasonably interpreted to give effect to the intentions of the Parties.

3.13.  Counterparts.  This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts and shall become effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by the Parties; each counterpart shall be deemed an original, but all counterparts shall constitute a single document.

3.14.  Survival.  The following provisions in this Agreement shall survive discharge:

As to both Parties, the following section shall survive discharge: Section 3.3. (indemnity) and Section 3.4 (Liability), until the expiration of all relevant statutes of limitations.

3.15.  Time.  Time is and shall be of the essence of this Agreement and each of its provisions in which performance is a factor.

3.16.  Remedies Cumulative.  No remedy or election of remedies provided for in this Agreement shall be deemed exclusive but shall be cumulative with all other remedies at law or in equity.  Each remedy shall be construed to give the fullest effect allowed by law.

3.17.  Applicable Law.  This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of California.

3.18.  Captions.  The captions in this Agreement are for convenience only and are not a part of this Agreement.  The captions do not in any way limit or amplify the provisions of this Agreement and shall not affect the construction or interpretation of any of its provisions.

3.19.  No Continuing Waiver.  The waiver by any Party of any breach of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same, or of any other provision of this Agreement. 159
Wayfinding Regional Funding Agreement
City of Greenfield
https://tamcmonterey.sharepoint.com/Shared Documents/TAMC NEW/Projects and Programs/Regional Wayfinding/02_Design/02_Project Mgmt/Funding Agmts/Wayfinding Regional Funding Agmt ‐ Greenfield 2022 0919.docx PAGE 6 OF 10

3.20.  No Rights in Third Parties.  Nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to confer any rights or remedies on any third‐party, nor is anything in this Agreement intended to relieve or discharge the obligation or liability of any third‐party to any Party to this Agreement, nor shall any provision of this Agreement give any third‐party any right of subrogation or action over or against any Party to this Agreement.

3.21.  Signatory’s Warranty.  Each Party warrants to each other that he or she is fully authorized and competent to enter into this Agreement in the capacity indicated by his or her signature and agrees to be bound by this Agreement as of the day and year first mentioned above upon the execution of this Agreement by each other Party.

3.22.  List of Exhibits.  This Agreement contains the following Exhibits:

Exhibit A: Project Description
Exhibit B: Wayfinding Sign Designs
Exhibit C: General Locations of Wayfinding Signs

** SIGNATURES ON THE NEXT PAGE **
160
Wayfinding Regional Funding Agreement
City of Greenfield
https://tamcmonterey.sharepoint.com/Shared Documents/TAMC NEW/Projects and Programs/Regional Wayfinding/02_Design/02_Project Mgmt/Funding Agmts/Wayfinding Regional Funding Agmt ‐ Greenfield 2022 0919.docx PAGE 7 OF 10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year first written above.

CITY OF GREENFIELD (RECIPIENT): TRANSPORTATION AGENCY FOR MONTEREY COUNTY (TAMC):

By:   By: ___________________________
Paul Wood   Todd A. Muck
City Manager   Executive Director
Dated:    Dated:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:   By: ___________________________
Mary F. Lerner     Robert Brayer
City Attorney     TAMC Counsel
Dated:      Dated:
161
Wayfinding Regional Funding Agreement
City of Greenfield
https://tamcmonterey.sharepoint.com/Shared Documents/TAMC NEW/Projects and Programs/Regional Wayfinding/02_Design/02_Project Mgmt/Funding Agmts/Wayfinding Regional Funding Agmt ‐ Greenfield 2022 0919.docx PAGE 8 OF 10

EXHIBIT A

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Installation and maintenance of signs at the locations generally described in Exhibit C, in order to encourage and facilitate active transportation to and around locations in Monterey County, with an emphasis on the City of Greenfield.

162
Wayfinding Regional Funding Agreement
City of Greenfield
https://tamcmonterey.sharepoint.com/Shared Documents/TAMC NEW/Projects and Programs/Regional Wayfinding/02_Design/02_Project Mgmt/Funding Agmts/Wayfinding Regional Funding Agmt ‐ Greenfield 2022 0919.docx PAGE 9 OF 10

EXHIBIT B

WAYFINDING SIGN DESIGN ACCEPTED BY RECIPIENT

1. CUSTOMIZED SIGN TOPPERS (to be used in conjunction with confirmation and direction signs) Full Color

2. CONFIRMATION SIGNS

3. DIRECTION SIGNS

163
Wayfinding Regional Funding Agreement
City of Greenfield
https://tamcmonterey.sharepoint.com/Shared Documents/TAMC NEW/Projects and Programs/Regional Wayfinding/02_Design/02_Project Mgmt/Funding Agmts/Wayfinding Regional Funding Agmt ‐ Greenfield 2022 0919.docx PAGE 10 OF 10

EXHIBIT C

GENERAL LOCATION OF WAYFINDING SIGNS
164

Regional Pedestrian and Bicyclist Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County Prepared by: Transportation Agency for Monterey County ● 55-B Plaza Circle, Salinas, CA● www.tamcmonterey.org May 2016
165
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
1 | P a g e
Contents
Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Purpose ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Funding ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee & Community Involvement .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Goals .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Existing Conditions ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Regulatory Requirements.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Wayfinding Sign Design Criteria ...............................................................................................................................................................................................10 Identification of Regional Routes ............................................................................................................................................................................................11 Development of Wayfinding Sign Design ....................................................................................................................................................................................15 Step 1: Vision ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................15 Step 2: Concept Development ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 18 Step 3: Final Wayfinding Sign Designs .....................................................................................................................................................................................18 Implementation Strategy .............................................................................................................................................................................................................20 Coordination with Existing and Future Signage .......................................................................................................................................................................20 Sign Production ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................21 Signs Per Mile ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................21 Potential Funding Sources .......................................................................................................................................................................................................23 Jurisdiction Agreements for Sign Installation and Maintenance .............................................................................................................................................23 Implementation Phasing ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................23 Cost Estimates..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................24 166
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
2 | P a g e
Appendix A – Regional Bicycle Routes, Underlying Jurisdictions & Destinations ........................................................................................................................28 Appendix B – Draft Conceptual Designs ......................................................................................................................................................................................42 Appendix C – Final Wayfinding Sign Designs and Placement Scenarios ......................................................................................................................................47 Appendix D – Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes ......................................................................................................................................59 167
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
3 | P a g e
Executive Summary
The Transportation Agency for Monterey County developed the Regional Pedestrian and Bicycle Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County to provide standard guidelines for bicycle and pedestrian wayfinding throughout Monterey County.

The goal of the Wayfinding Plan is to improve access to regional destinations, provide consistent wayfinding signs for regional connections, and promote key sign features that jurisdictions will be encouraged to incorporate into their own signs in order to improve wayfinding within city boundaries. Uniform signage supports residents and visitors who want to bicycle or walk for transportation and recreation, and can enhance each jurisdiction’s brand as a regional destination.

The Wayfinding Plan includes:
 Introduction: The overall goal of the Wayfinding Plan is to improve bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and to promote bicycling and walking as viable transportation alternatives for Monterey County residents and visitors. This section describes the need and purpose for bicycle and pedestrian wayfinding signage, funding, the function of the Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee and community involvement in the development of the Plan.
 Existing Conditions: While the county is currently served by a wide variety of bicycle facilities, the majority of the area lacks a clear, comprehensive, and consistent sign system that provides bicycle users with directional information and mileage to points of interest.

This section includes a summary of regulatory criteria for wayfinding signage, and includes design criteria developed by the Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee. This section includes criteria for the development of regional routes and destinations.  Development of Wayfinding Signage: Development of the preferred sign design was a three-step process guided by an extensive community input process. This section describes the visioning process, concept development, and final design of the wayfinding signage.
 Implementation Strategy: This section includes information about the regional routes that will be signed, sign placement guidelines, sign production, and an estimate of the number of signs per mile. Potential funding sources, a discussion about jurisdiction agreements and information about implementation phasing are also included in this section.

Implementation of the Wayfinding Plan will begin once the Plan is adopted. TAMC will apply for grant funding for full implementation of the Plan, work on the procurement of signage, and will coordinate with the underlying jurisdictions to install signage. 168
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
4 | P a g e
Introduction
Bicycle and pedestrian facilities are integral components of Monterey County’s multimodal transportation system. This Wayfinding Plan is part of a regional effort to enhance the bicycle and pedestrian network to encourage people to bike or walk for transportation purposes.

Purpose
The need for a Wayfinding Plan was identified in the Transportation Agency’s 2011 Master Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan as a means for promoting bicycling and walking throughout the county. Wayfinding signs can ease navigation for bicyclists and pedestrians, reduce travel times, and enhance a region’s brand by reinforcing key regional destinations. When combined with secure bicycle storage and a connected network of bicycle paths and lanes, a wayfinding system can attract the estimated 60% of potential bicyclists who indicate that they would cycle more often if it were safer and easier to do so1. By enhancing the environment for bicycling and walking signs can also improve the visibility and safety for these alternative forms of transportation. Cities around the nation with significant bicycle ridership and pedestrian activity have implemented similar wayfinding plans and programs including: Berkeley and Oakland in California along with Portland, Oregon (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Examples of Signs
Berkeley, CA Oakland, CA Portland, OR

1 “Four Types of Cyclists”; Source: Roger Geller, Portland Office of Transportation. 169
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
5 | P a g e
Funding
TAMC programmed $30,000 of Regional Surface Transportation Funds in the 2014/2015 fiscal year to prepare this Wayfinding Plan. For the next three years, TAMC has programmed a total of $90,000 for the implementation of the Wayfinding Plan.

Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee & Community Involvement The Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee is an ad-hoc committee comprised of project stakeholders including representatives from TAMC’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Advisory Committee, the County of Monterey, local cities, the Monterey County Health Department, Building Healthy Communities, Fort Ord Re-use Authority, the Velo Club, Green Pedal Couriers, Fort Ord Recreation Trails Friends, Pebble Beach, and Monterey-Salinas Transit. Table 1 lists the full Committee membership. The purpose of the group was to develop plan goals, assist in the identification of regional routes to be signed, provide input on the preferred sign design and implementation. The group met monthly from February to November, 2015, and again in February 2016 to provide final input on the Plan.

In addition to Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee input, Agency staff consulted with TAMC’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Advisory Committee (BPC), which is composed of volunteer representatives from each supervisorial district and city in Monterey County as well as representatives from public agencies and a bicycle/pedestrian interest group, as appointed by the TAMC Board of Directors, and TAMC’s Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), comprised of public works representatives from each of the twelve cities in Monterey County, Monterey County Public Works, Monterey County Planning, Caltrans, Monterey-Salinas Transit, the Fort Ord Reuse Authority, the Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District, and the Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments.

Table 1: Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee members.

Stakeholder Representative
Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments Eliza Yu
TAMC Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Advisory Committee D.L. Johnson Building Healthy Communities Jeanette Pantoja
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Victoria Beach
City of Marina Justin Meek
City of Monterey Andrea Renny
City of Salinas James Serrano
Victor Gomez
170
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
6 | P a g e
City of Soledad Brent Slama
California State University Monterey Bay Bernard Green
Fort Ord Reuse Authority Josh Metz
Green Pedal Couriers Michael Baronial
Monterey County Ryan Chapman
Monterey County Health Department Krista Hanni
Monterey-Salinas Transit Lisa Rheinheimmer
Pebble Beach Company Kevin Cole
Fort Ord Recreation Trails Friends/Pedal Alpini, Inc. Eric Peterson Velo Club Bill Boosman
Lastly, TAMC staff developed a project specific Wayfinding Plan page on the TAMC website. Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee meeting agendas, meeting minutes and draft documents were posted on this site. Staff gathered community input using the TAMC Wayfinding Plan mySidewalk page, an online public engagement tool similar in layout to Facebook. Agency staff used the mySidewalk to obtain input on regional routes and sign designs. The mySidewalk tool was particularly useful in obtaining feedback on sign design, as people were able to vote for their preferred design. Figure 2 illustrates the Wayfinding Plan mySidewalk page, along with page view statistics. 171
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
7 | P a g e
Figure 2: Wayfinding Plan mySidewalk page.

Goals
The overall goal of the Wayfinding Plan is to improve bicycle and pedestrian facilities in order to promote bicycling and walking as viable transportation for Monterey County residents and visitors. Directing bicyclists and pedestrians to safer routes will increase traffic safety for all street users and will encourage bicycling and walking in Monterey County. Outlined below are the Wayfinding Plan’s specific goals.

1. Create uniform wayfinding sign design guidelines
172
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
8 | P a g e

2. Promote connectivity between communities and encourage connectivity to regional destinations, such as parks, trails, educational institutions, employment centers, transit, park and ride lots, and tourist destinations

3. Identify and brand pedestrian and bicycle routes and provide signage that supports new and infrequent users to walk and bicycle more frequently

4. Support the local economy by providing Monterey County residents and tourists with directional and distance information

5. Use wayfinding signage to provide distance information and facilitate pedestrian and bicyclist access to regional destinations within Monterey County Wayfinding signage should incorporate technology, and be accessible via GPS and online map tools

6. Wayfinding signage should be distributed equitably across the County

7. Create safer pedestrian and bicyclists facilities by using wayfinding signage to make bicycle and pedestrian routes more visible

8. Maintain community engagement throughout the planning process Existing Conditions
The region’s mild climate and relatively flat topography make biking and walking a viable mode of travel for county residents. There are currently 213 bikeway miles in Monterey County, consisting of 43.7 miles of Class I separated bike paths, 115.1 miles of Class II striped bike lanes, and 54.5 miles of Class III shared bicycle routes2 . Among the bike and pedestrian facilities in Monterey County, the Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail is the largest Class I facility, extending from Lovers Point in Pacific Grove to Del Monte Boulevard north of Marina (14 miles). In addition, there are 8.4 bikeway miles on the California State University, Monterey Bay campus: 0.3 miles of Class I separated bike paths, 2.5 miles of Class II striped bike lanes, 4.7 miles of Class III shared bicycle routes and 0.9 miles of Class IV protected bike lanes.

While the county is currently served by a wide variety of bicycle facilities, the majority of the area lacks a clear, comprehensive, and consistent sign system that provides bicycle users with directional information and mileage to points of interest. The County of Monterey and each of the jurisdictions currently use the standard California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Device guide signage indicating the existence of Class I, II and III bikeways. Caution Watch for Bicyclists signs are also used to warn motorists of potential bicyclist activity, such as where the Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail intersects Sand Dunes Road in Monterey. Figure 8 shows the typical bikeway signage present throughout the region.

2 Data source: TAMC 2015 bikeways data.
173
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
9 | P a g e
Figure 3: California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices design spectrum. (Source: Alta Planning + Design) Regulatory Requirements
There are many different types of bicycle wayfinding signs used in the United States. The most commonly-used signs are from the Federal Highway Administration’s Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (Federal Manual), as national compliance provides liability protection. 174
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
10 | P a g e
The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California Manual) is the most commonly used guide in the State, and it conforms to and contains most of the signs in the Federal Manual, along with state-specific additions and modifications.

The goal of both manuals is to ensure consistency of traffic control devices. In the California Manual, street sign traffic control devices are defined as “signs, signals, markings…used to regulate, warn or guide traffic, placed on, over, or adjacent to a street, highway, pedestrian facility, bikeway, or private road open to public travel.” Both the Federal Manual and the California Manual require that wayfinding signage meet certain regulatory requirements, such as font type and text size. On the other hand, section 2D.50 of the Federal Manual, which deals with community wayfinding, allows for custom colors and enhanced graphics. Figure 3 illustrates the spectrum of Federal Manual compliance. In the visioning portion of the planning process, the Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee, along with input from community stakeholders, choose to develop a sign design similar to options #1 and #2 of the State Manual design spectrum.

Wayfinding Sign Design Criteria
This Wayfinding Plan sets uniform wayfinding sign design guidelines. In consideration of signage regulatory requirements, the Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee developed criteria for signs based on Plan goals. Signs should be clear, concise, consistent and compatible with existing wayfinding signs across jurisdictional boundaries, including into Santa Cruz County and San Benito County. More specifically, wayfinding signs design should meet the following criteria:

1. There will be three wayfinding sign types, including: gateway signage, directional and distance information signage, and add-on signage that can be placed on existing signage

2. Wayfinding signage should be accessible to people of all literacy levels, be legible to a wide range of users, and use symbols to convey directional information

3. Wayfinding signage should improve access to regional destinations, such as regional parks and open spaces, trails, educational institutions, major employment centers, transit, park and ride lots and tourist destinations

4. Wayfinding signage should provide information such as: location of bike supportive amenities, comfort level and ADA accessibility

5. Wayfinding signage should be eye-catching and have space for a city logo or identifier

6. Wayfinding signage should reflect the character of the region

7. When applicable, wayfinding signage will be placed in accordance with the regulatory requirements spelled out in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
175
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
11 | P a g e
Identification of Regional Routes
In order to meet the goals of the Wayfinding Plan to promote walking and bicycling, connect bicyclists and pedestrians to regional destinations within their communities, and encourage connectivity between communities, it a best practice for signs to identify cities, downtown areas, neighborhood districts, regional parks and recreation areas, academic institutions, and civic destinations. The regional routes and destinations proposed for wayfinding directional and distance signs meet the following criteria.

Criteria for Wayfinding Signs on
Bicycle and Pedestrian Routes
Criteria for Identification of Regional
Destinations & Points of Interest in Signs
 Regional bicycle routes identified in
the Transportation Agency’s 2011
Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
classified as Class I, II, III and planned
Class I, II, III, and IV facilities
 Routes with low volume automobile
traffic Routes near transit
 Destinations located along a route that
attract intercity or intercounty travel,
such as transit centers, regional parks,
colleges and job centers.
 Points of interest located within
vicinity of a regional route but not
directly along a route, such as transit
centers, regional parks, colleges and
job centers.

Using the Transportation Agency’s 2011 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan as a foundation, the Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee went through a regional bicycle mapping exercise. Based on this exercise, and on the input from a variety of stakeholder groups, including TAMC’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee and Technical Advisory Committee, the team created a map of key regional routes along which wayfinding signs will be placed, shown in Figure 4. Table 2 lists the length of these routes, a high-level description of the route’s streets and roads and destinations. An interactive map with these routes will also be maintained on the TAMC website. Appendix A contains a more detailed set of maps, and a table that includes regional route beginning and end points, and underlying jurisdictions.

Jurisdictions can also develop and place signage along their own local routes that may connect to the larger regional routes. In these cases, local jurisdictions are encouraged to use the signs in this Plan to promote their own local destinations. 176
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
12 | P a g e
Table 2: Regional Routes
North County Routes Description Miles
1 Elkhorn Slough Loop Connects Pajaro, Las Lomas, Moss Landing and Castroville; via Salinas Road, Highway 1, Molera Road and Elkhorn Road

32.42 2 Pajaro – Salinas Connects Pajaro, Las Lomas, Prunedale Shopping Centers, Prunedale Park and Ride lot, Manzanita County Regional Park, North Salinas, Salinas, Spreckles via Hall Road, San Miguel Canyon Road, Prunedale South Road, Harrison Road

24.28 3 Salinas Periphery Loop Connects Southwest Salinas, North Salinas Shopping Center, Northeast Salinas schools and parks, Hartnell College Main Campus and Hartnell College Alisal Campus; via Davis Road and Boronda Road and crosses Salinas through Alisal Street

16.29 4 Marina – Salinas Multimodal Corridor Connects Oldtown Salinas, Salinas Amtrak Station, MST Salinas Transit Center, City of Salinas and Monterey County Government Centers, Hartnell College Main Campus, East Garrison, California State University Monterey Bay Campus, Marina Shopping Center, MST Marina Transit Exchange; via West Alisal Street, Blanco Road, Davis Road, Reservation Road, Imjin Parkway, 2nd Avenue and Divaty Street

14.94 5 North Salinas to San Benito County via San
Juan Grade Rd
Connects North Salinas and San Juan Bautista, San Benito County; via San Juan Grade Road

12.12 6 Castroville – Salinas Connects Castroville and Oldtown Salinas; via Merritt Street, Castroville Boulevard and West Market Street

8.17 Peninsula Routes Miles
7 Monterey Peninsula Loop Connects Castroville, Marina, California State University Monterey Bay, Seaside, Sand City, Monterey, Pacific Grove, Pebble Beach and Carmel-by-the-Sea; via Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail along the Peninsula, and California Avenue, General Jim Moore Boulevard, Canyon Del Rey Boulevard and Aguajito among other internal local city streets

40.89 8 Carmel – Monterey Connects Carmel-by-the-Sea and Monterey; via San Carlos Street, 5.11 177
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
13 | P a g e
Carpenter Street, the Highway 1 bike path, Viejo Road, and Munras Avenue
9 Fort Ord Loop Connects Salinas, Spreckles, California State University Monterey Bay, and Fort Ord; travels via Highway 68 and Reservation Road

23.44 10 Fort Ord Inner Loop Connects California State University Monterey Bay, Seaside, Fort Ord, Ryan Ranch and Del Rey Oaks; via Gigling Road, Hennekens Ranch Road, Barloy Canyon Road and South Boundary Road

11.63 South County Routes Miles
11 Marina – Greenfield via Reservation Rd &
River Rd
Connects Marina, East Garrison, Salinas, Spreckles, Fort Romie and Greenfield; travels via Reservation Road and River Road

49.31 12 Salinas – King City & San Ardo Connects Salinas, Chualar, Gonzales, Soledad, Greenfield, King City, San Lucas and San Ardo ; travels via Natividad Road, Old Stage Road, Old US 101 roads, Metz Road and Cattleman Road

65.31 13 Carmel Valley – Greenfield Connects Carmel Valley to Greenfield; via Carmel Valley Road 55.52 14 Soledad – Pinnacles Connects Soledad to the Pinnacles National Park; via Highway 146 9.31 178

Figure 4: Overview of Regional Routes
179

It is important to note that there are routes, such as the Carmel Valley to Greenfield Route, identified along corridors that do not have official existing or planned bicycle facilities, but instead are considered commonly used routes. In these cases, route segments will be analyzed for potential inclusion in the upcoming Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan update, and can be signed at a later phase.

Development of Wayfinding Sign Design
Step 1: Vision
The Transportation Agency contracted with Alta Planning + Design to develop designs for gateway signs, directional and distance information signs, and add-ons that can be placed on existing signs. On June 4, 2015, the Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee participated in a visioning exercise to assist in the development of the wayfinding sign design concepts. As part of the visioning meeting, Committee members shared the opportunities and challenges in navigating Monterey County’s active transportation network and provided input on the preferred sign designs. Figure 5 summarizes the input from the visioning meeting. 180

Figure 5: Poster boards from the June 4, 2015 visioning meeting prepared by Alta Planning + Design.

When asked about the message that best conveys Monterey County, Committee members most frequently mentioned: beauty, scenic, friendly and fun.
181
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
17 | P a g e
Committee members, staff and the public gave the highest ranking to: the Mountains to Sea color palette and textured aluminum, brushed steel and concrete to corten steel materials . 182

Step 2: Concept Development
Based on Committee, staff and public input gathered during the visioning session, Alta Planning + Design prepared three draft wayfinding design concepts. Each of the design concepts included a directional sign, a sign topper to be placed on existing signs, an information gateway kiosk treatment and a trail post design. Figure 6 shows examples of the three directional sign design concepts. The full set of draft design concepts are shown in Appendix B.

Figure 6: Directional Sign Design Concepts
Concept #1 Concept #2 Concept #3
Step 3: Final Wayfinding Sign Designs
Following an extensive community outreach effort and Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee discussion, Alta Planning + Design developed a package of final wayfinding sign designs, based on Concept #1, with elements from Concept #2. Two design options were developed to allow local jurisdictions the flexibility to choose their level of conformity with the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. In addition, the decorative non-standard sign elements are now in the sign topper. Figure 7 shows an example of the final wayfinding sign design, with the complete design package shown in Appendix C.
183
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
19 | P a g e
Figure 7: Final Wayfinding Sign Designs
184
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
20 | P a g e
Implementation Strategy
Coordination with Existing and Future Signage
There will be coordination of signs with other current and future wayfinding signs in order to avoid sign clutter, as sign clutter is unsafe and undesirable. Existing signage for the Pacific Coast bike route along Highway 1, Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail, signage for CSU Monterey Bay’s bicycle boulevard network, along with standard bike path, bike lane and bike route signs currently exist throughout the region. Figure 8 provides an overview of the existing signs throughout Monterey County.

Figure 8: Examples of Existing Bicycle Facility Sign Types Pacific Coast Bike Route CSU Monterey Bay,
Bike Boulevard
Class I Bike Path Class II Bike Lane Class III Bike Route 185
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
21 | P a g e
Wayfinding Plan signs will supplement existing signs, such as those that denote bike lanes and bike routes. Directional signs will be placed as prescribed by the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Countrol Devices along a route. Appendix C contains typical placement scenarios. Sign toppers to identify the regional route name will be placed on top of existing bike path, bike lane and bike route signs, where feasible. Figure 9 shows an example of how toppers can be used to supplement existing bicycle facility signage. Gateway kiosks will be placed at trailheads, and can be placed in downtown areas or other areas with more pedestrian activity. It is the goal to place signs along regional bicycle routes identified in this Wayfinding Plan.

Local jurisdictions are encouraged to use the sign designs to sign their own local bicycle and pedestrian routes. The City of Monterey is in the process of initiating a citywide vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian wayfinding sign plan. TAMC staff will remain involved in the process to ensure regional and local coordination in wayfinding sign locations and designs.

Sign Production
Two sign options were developed to accommodate local city preferences of using the standard directional plate that does not include miles or minute information and for Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee members that have advocated for in-house local sign shop production of the directional sign portion when possible. However, due to the limitations of local sign shops, Committee members discussed the need to contract out for the add-on signs that may be beyond the capability of local city sign shops.

Committee members have also suggested that TAMC should take the lead in the procurement of signage.

TAMC will issue an invitation for bids for production of the sign toppers and directional sign templates.

Signs Per Mile
Overall installation costs will be determined based on the number of signs per mile. In general, the number of signs will be determined by the number of destinations along a route. Appendix C includes sign placement guidance. Signs will be placed in conformance with the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. For on-street regional bike routes, directional signs will be placed at decision points where two routes intersect and confirmation signs, such as the sign topper pictured in Figure 9, will be placed about every 2 to 3 blocks on existing bikeway signs along a regional route. For the regional routes identified in the plan, Table 3 shows the approximate number of signs needed Figure 9: Sign Topper on
Existing Sign
186
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
22 | P a g e
per route based on route length and number of destinations. Appendix A provides detailed information about the street network and destinations along routes proposed for signage.

Table 3 – Signs per Regional route mile
Route Miles Destinations
(approx.)
Directional Signs with Sign Toppers
(approx.)
Sign Toppers for Confirmation Signs
(approx.)
Elkhorn Slough Loop 32.42 10 30 38
Pajaro – Salinas 24.28 11 65 85
Salinas Periphery
Loop

16.29 11 32 18
Marina – Salinas
Multimodal Corridor

14.94 8 8 10
North Salinas to San
Benito County

12.12 3 9 14
Castroville – Salinas 8.17 3 6 16
Monterey Peninsula
Loop

40.89 41 80 65
Carmel – Monterey 5.11 4 4 6
Fort Ord Loop 23.44 6 10 36
Fort Ord Inner Loop 11.63 10 10 18
Marina – Greenfield
via Reservation Rd &
River Rd

49.31 8 28 40
Salinas – King City &
San Ardo

65.31 16 50 130
Carmel Valley –
Greenfield

55.52 6 12 60
Soledad – Pinnacles 9.31 2 8 16
187
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
23 | P a g e
Mile marker posts should be used at intersections with other separated bike paths or when a direction sign is not used and at locations where the route is not explicit. Mile marker posts should be located at ½ to 2-mile intervals along a corridor. For on-street bike routes, signs will be placed at decision points where two routes intersect, and in advance of turns. Pavement markings are recommended to be used in between signs to confirm that a bicyclist is on a preferred route, and to minimize sign clutter.

Potential Funding Sources
TAMC currently has a total of $75,000 of Regional Surface Transportation Funds budgeted over the next three years for the implementation of the Wayfinding Plan. However, this funding may be leveraged to pursue grants for full implementation of the plan. Other potential funding sources include: state Active Transportation Program, Transportation Development Act 2% for bicycle/pedestrian projects, city or county road funds, and local transportation sales tax revenues. Individual jurisdictions or TAMC can apply for Active Transportation Program funds to assist in the implementation of regional route portions.

Jurisdiction Agreements for Sign Installation and Maintenance TAMC staff will work coordinate sign installation and maintenance with local jurisdictions. Agreements, contracts or memorandums of understanding to install signs along a route will be handled on a case-by-case basis.

Maintenance is a crucial component of the Wayfinding Plan. Once signs are installed, a GIS database should be maintained to keep track of sign stock. This database will assist in the development of a maintenance schedule. In case of theft, signs will be replaced on an as-needed basis.

Implementation Phasing
Throughout the planning process, Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee members and members of the community expressed the need to prioritize signage along key areas where connectivity from one bike facility to another is confusing. Such areas, which will be signed in the first phase include:
 Canyon del Rey Boulevard (SR 218)
 Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail in Sand City
 Carmel-by-the-Sea to Monterey route
The following routes will be signed in the second phase of the implementation program:
188
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
24 | P a g e
 Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail from Marina to Pacific Grove  Salinas Periphery Loop
The regional routes that do not yet have existing or proposed designated bikeway facilities may or may not be signed until the facilities are in place. However, in some cases placing signs on proposed Class III facilities located along a regional route will make those routes Class III.

Similarly, future regional routes and trails, such as the Fort Ord Recreational Trail and Greenway, will be signed once they are constructed.

Routes that will be signed in the third phase include:
 South County route via River Rd (Marina – Greenfield via Reservation Rd & River Rd)  Salinas – King City/San Ardo
Cost Estimates
TAMC staff obtained estimates for sign fabrication and third party installation. Final cost will depend on local jurisdiction sign option preference, hardware preference and whether a third-party contractor or local jurisdiction staff will install signs. A visual of sign options with accompanying cost estimates for fabrication are shown in Figure 10, and cost estimates for hardware and third-party contractor installation are shown in Table 3.
189
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
25 | P a g e
Figure 10: Sign Cost Estimate
190
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
26 | P a g e
Table 3: Hardware & Installation Estimates
Item Cost Estimate
Galvanized Steel Unistrut Pole $158.00
Galvanized Steel Cylindrical Pole $78.00
Installed into a Concrete Footer $676.00
Installed into soil 3’ deep, no concrete $360.00
In considering the fabrication costs and the costs of new cylindrical sign poles TAMC has developed a draft estimate for the implementation of the Wayfinding Plan. The estimate was prepared assuming a sign cost of $250 per sign, which includes the cost of a sign with topper and a cylindrical pole, and $70 per sign topper to act as a confirmation sign and to be placed on an existing sign. The total cost estimate for signs for all three phases is $125, 710. Table 4 summarizes this budget for the cost of purchasing signs only, and does not include installation costs.

Local jurisdiction ability to install signs or the need to use a third-party contractor will determine the final installation cost.

Table 4: Cost Estimate for Each Phase of Implementation Phase 1
Cost per
Route
Total
Signs
Directional
Signs
Confirmation
Signs
Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail in Sand City $1,140 6 4 2 Carmel-by-the-Sea to Monterey route $1,420 10 4 6
Canyon del Rey Boulevard (SR 218) $1,530 9 5 4
Total Signs Phase 1 25 13 12
Total Cost Estimate for Signs - Phase 1 $4,090 $3,250 $840 Phase 2
Cost per
Route
Total
Signs
Directional
Signs
Confirmation
Signs
Monterey Peninsula Loop: Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail from Marina to Pacific Grove $20,950 145 60 85
Salinas Periphery Loop $9,260 50 32 18
Total Signs Phase 1 195 92 103
Total Cost Estimate for Signs - Phase 2 $30,210 $23,000 $7,210 191
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
27 | P a g e
Phase 3
Cost per
Route
Total
Signs
Directional
Signs
Confirmation
Signs
Elkhorn Slough Loop $10,160 68 30 38
Pajaro – Salinas $22,200 150 65 85
Marina – Salinas Multimodal Corridor $2,700 18 8 10
North Salinas to San Benito County $3,230 23 9 14
Castroville – Salinas $2,620 22 6 16
Fort Ord Loop $5,020 46 10 36
Fort Ord Inner Loop $3,760 28 10 18
Marina - Greenfield via Reservation Rd & River Rd $9,800 68 28 40 Salinas - King City & San Ardo $21,600 180 50 130
Carmel Valley - Greenfield $7,200 72 12 60
Soledad - Pinnacles $3,120 24 8 16
Total Signs Phase 3 749 268 481
Total Cost Estimate for Signs - Phase 3 $91,410 $67,000 $33,670 Total for all 3 Phases $125,710
Implementation of the Wayfinding Plan will begin once the Plan is adopted. TAMC will pursue grant funding for implementation of the Plan as opportunities arise, work on the procurement of signage, and will coordinate with the underlying jurisdictions to install signage. 192
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
28 | P a g e
Appendix A – Regional Bicycle Routes, Underlying Jurisdictions & Destinations The regional routes identified in the Wayfinding Plan will be signed and are detailed in this section. This section also includes maps of the regional routes. An interactive map of the routes will also be maintained on the TAMC website.

North County Routes
Route Miles Underlying Jurisdiction(s) Street Network Destinations & Points of Interest
Elkhorn Slough Loop 32.42 Monterey County
Caltrans
On the West Side:
- McGowan Road
- Trafton Road
- Bluff Road
- Jensen Road
- Highway 1
- Molera Road
On the East Side:
- Salinas Road
- Elkhorn Road
- Omart Road
- Del Monte Farms Road
- Castroville Boulevard
- Watsonville
- Pajaro
- Pajaro Middle
School
- Las Lomas
- Elkhorn Slough
Preserve
- Kirby Park
- Moss Landing
- Moss Landing State
Wildlife Area
- Royal Oaks County
Park
- Castroville
Pajaro – Salinas 24.28 Monterey County
City of Salinas
From Las Lomas/Prunedale:
- Hall Road
- San Miguel Canyon Road
- Prunedale North Road
- Prunedale South Road
- Reese Circle
- County Meadows Road
- Harrison Road
From Salinas:
- Las Lomas
- Manzanita County
Park
- Prunedale
Shopping Center
- Bolsa Knolls School
- Santa Rita School
- North Salinas
Shopping District
- Salinas Sports
193
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
29 | P a g e
- Russell Road
- San Juan Grade Road
- North Main Street
- East Alvin Drive
- Maryal Drive
- East Bernal Drive
- Sherwood Drive
- East Front Street
- East Abbott Street
- Harkins Road
- Spreckles Avenue
Complex
- Sherwood Park
- Oldtown Salinas
- Spreckles
- Highway 68
Salinas Periphery Loop 16.29 City of Salinas From the East:
- East Alisal Street
- Bardin Road
- Williams Road
- East Boronda Road
From the North:
- Boronda Road
- North Davis Road
From the West:
- South Davis Road
- Blanco Road
- West Alisal Street
- Hartnell College
Alisal Campus
- Alisal High School
- Natividad Creek
Park
- Everett Alvarez
High School
- North Salinas
Shopping District
- North Davis
Shopping District
- Hartnell Park
- Hartnell College
- Monterey County
Civic Center
- Salinas City Hall
- Oldtown Salinas
Marina – Salinas
Multimodal Corridor

14.94 City of Salinas
Monterey County
From Salinas:
- Salinas Street
- Oldtown Salinas
- Monterey County
194
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
30 | P a g e
City of Marina - West Alisal
- Blanco Road
To Marina:
- South Davis Road
- Reservation Road
- Imjin Parkway
- 2
nd Avenue
- Divarty Street
Civic Center
- Hartnell College
- Hartnell Park
- East Garrison
- Marina Equestrian
Center
- California State
University,
Monterey Bay
- Monterey
Peninsula College
at Marina
North Salinas to San Benito
County via San Juan Grade Rd

12.12 City of Salinas
Monterey County
- San Juan Grade Road
- Salinas Road
- Bolsa Knolls
School?
- San Juan Bautista
Salinas – Castroville 8.91 City of Salinas
Monterey County
From Salinas:
- East Market Street
- West Market Street
To Castroville:
- Castroville Boulevard
- Merritt Street
- Oldtown Salinas
- Salinas Rail Station
- Castroville
195
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
31 | P a g e
196

Peninsula Routes
Route Miles Underlying Jurisdictions Street Network Destinations & Points of Interest
Monterey Peninsula Loop 40.89 Monterey County
City of Marina
City of Seaside
Sand City
California State Parks
City of Monterey
Monterey Peninsula
Regional Park District
City of Pacific Grove
Pebble Beach Company
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea
On the Peninsula Side (North to
South):

Castroville Area:
- Castroville Bike Path
(parallel to Highway 156)
- Nashua Road
- Monte Road
Marina, Seaside, Sand City Area:
- Monterey Bay Sanctuary
Scenic Trail (parallel to
Del Monte Boulevard)
Monterey Area:
- Monterey Bay Sanctuary
Scenic Trail (parallel to
Highway 1)
- Monterey Bay Sanctuary
Scenic Trail (City of
Monterey portion)
Pacific Grove Area:
- Monterey Bay Sanctuary
Scenic Trail (City of Pacific
Grove portion)
- Oceanview Boulevard
- Sunset Drive
Pebble Beach Area:
- 17 Mile Drive
- Spyglass Hill Road
On the Peninsula Side
(North to South):
- Castroville
- Marina
- Locke-Paddon Park
- Marina Courthouse
- Fort Ord Dunes
State Park
- Seaside High School
- Sand City
- Monterey State
Beach
- Del Monte Lake
- Naval Post
Graduate School
- Fisherman’s Wharf
- Fisherman’s
Shoreline Park
- San Carlos Beach
Park
- Presidio of
Monterey
- Cannery Row
- Monterey Bay
Aquarium
- Lover’s Point Park
- Asilomar State
197
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
33 | P a g e
- 17 Mile Drive
Carmel Area:
- Carmel Way
- North San Antonio
Avenue
- Ocean Avenue
- Scenic Drive
- Carmelo Street
- Dolores Street
- Lasuen Drive
- Rio Road
On the Inland Side (North to
South):

Marina, Seaside, Sand City Area:
- California Avenue
- Imjin Parkway
- 2
nd Avenue
- Inter-Garrison Road
- 7
th Avenue
- General Jim Moore
Boulevard
- Broadway Avenue
- Noche Buena Street
- Playa Avenue
- Metz Road
- Tioga Avenue
Del Rey Oaks, Seaside, Monterey
Area:
- General Jim Moore
Boulevard
- Canyon del Rey Boulevard
Beach
- Pebble Beach
- 17 Mile Drive
- Carmel Beach
- Carmel Mission
- Mission Trail Park
- Carmel River State
Beach
- Carmel Valley
Shopping Center
On the Inland Side (North
to South):
- Marina Equestrian
Center
- Marina Shopping
- California State
University,
Monterey Bay
- Fort Ord National
Monument
- Seaside Broadway
Shopping
- Frog Pond
- Del Rey Oaks City
Hall
- Laguna Grande
Regional Park
- Monterey County
Fairgrounds
- Monterey Regional
Airport
198
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
34 | P a g e
- North Fremont Street
- Casa Verde Way
- Fairgrounds Road
- Mark Thomas Drive
- Aguajito Road
- Fremont Street
- Abrego Street
- Pearl Street
- Van Buren Street
- Scott Street
- Pacific Street
- Artillery Street
- Corporal Ewing Road
- Pvt Bolio Road
- Hawthorne Street
- Laine Street
Pacific Grove Area:
- David Avenue
- Spencer Street
- Pine Avenue
Pebble Beach Area:
- 17 Mile Drive
Carmel Area:
- Carmelo Street
- 15th Avenue
- Dolores Street
- Santa Catalina
School
- Monterey
Peninsula College
- Presidio of
Monterey
- New Monterey
- Pacific Grove
- George Washington
Park
- Pebble Beach
Carmel – Monterey 5.11 City of Carmel-by-the-Sea
Monterey County
Caltrans
City of Monterey
Carmel Area:
- Rio Road
- 13th Avenue
- San Carlos Street
- Camino Del Monte
Carmel Area:
- Carmel Mission
- Ocean Avenue
Shopping
199
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
35 | P a g e
- Serra Avenue
- Carpenter Street
- Carpenter Street
- Highway 1
- Highway 68
- Highway 1 Bike Path
Monterey Area:
- Viejo Road
- Soledad Drive
- Munras Avenue
- Abrego Street
- Washington Street
Monterey Area:
- Del Monte
Shopping
- Monterey Sports
Center
Fort Ord Loop 23.44 City of Del Rey Oaks
Monterey County
Bureau of Land
Management
Fort Ord Reuse Authority
California State University,
Monterey Bay
From Northwest to Southwest:
- Gigling Road
- Hennekens Ranch Road
- Eucalyptus Road
- Barloy Canyon Road
- South Boundary Road
- California State
University
Monterey Bay
- Fort Ord National
Monument
- Laguna Seca
Raceway
- York School
- Ryan Ranch
- Del Rey Oaks
Fort Ord Inner Loop 11.63 Caltrans
Monterey County
California State University,
Monterey Bay
From Salinas to Del Rey Oaks:
- Highway 68
From California State University,
Monterey Bay to Highway 68:
- Inter-Garrison Road
- Reservation Road
From Salinas to Del Rey
Oaks:
- South Salinas
- Toro County Park
- San Benancio
- Corral de Tierra
- Fort Ord National
200
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
36 | P a g e
Monument
- Laguna Seca
- Ryan Ranch
From California State
University, Monterey Bay
to Highway 68:
- California State
University,
Monterey Bay
- East Garrison
- Fort Ord National
Monument
201
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
37 | P a g e
202
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
38 | P a g e
South County Routes
Route Miles Underlying Jurisdictions Street Network Destinations & Points of Interest
Marina – Greenfield via
Reservation Road and River
Road

49.31 City of Marina
Monterey County
Caltrans
City of Gonzales
City of Greenfield
From North to South:

Marina/South Salinas Area:
- Reservation Road
- River Road
Chualar Area:
- Chualar River Road
- River Road
Gonzales Area:
- Gonzales River Road
- River Road
Soledad/Greenfield Area:
- Fort Romie Road
- Arroyo Seco Road
- Thorne Road
- El Camino Real
- Elm Avenue
From North to South:
- Marina Library
- Marina Shopping
- UC MBEST
- East Garrison
- Chualar
- Gonzales
- Soledad Mission
- Downtown
Greenfield
Salinas – King City/San Ardo 65.31 City of Salinas
Monterey County
City of Gonzales
City of Soledad
King City
From North to South:

Salinas Area:
- Natividad Road
- Old Stage Road
- Alisal Road
- Old Stage Road
From North to South:

Salinas Area:
- Natividad Hospital
- Rancho Cielo
- Hartnell College
Alisal Campus
- Old Stage Road
203
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
39 | P a g e
Chualar/Gonzales Area:
- Chualar River Road
- Payson Street
- Grant Street
- Chualar Road
- Foletta Road
- Alta Street (Old US
Highway 101)
- Tavernetti Road
- Gonzales River Road
Soledad Area*:
- Pending Soledad frontage
roads
- Front Street
- Monterey Street
- East Street
- Metz Road
- Metz-Soledad Road
King City Area:
- Metz-King City Road
- 1
st Street
- Mesa Verde Road
- Wildhorse Road
- Cattleman Road
South County:
- Chualar
- Gonzales
- Downtown
Gonzales
- Gonzales City Hall
- Soledad
- Downtown Soledad
- Soledad City Hall
- YMCA
- King City
- Downtown King
City
- San Lucas
- San Ardo
Carmel Valley – Greenfield 55.52 Monterey County North to South:
- Bike path parallel to
Highway 1 between Rio
Road & Carmel Valley
Road
- West Carmel Valley Road
Carmel Area:
- Carmel Mission
- Carmel Valley
Shopping
- Garland Ranch
Regional Park
204
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
40 | P a g e
- Laureles Grade Road
(connection to Highway
68)
- East Carmel Valley Road
- Arroyo Seco Road
- Carmel Valley
- Los Padres National
Forest
- Greenfield
Soledad – Pinnacles 9.31 City of Soledad
Caltrans
West to East:
- Metz Road
- Shirtail Canyon Road
- Soledad
- Pinnacles National
Park
205

206

Appendix B – Draft Conceptual Designs
207
MONTEREY COUNTY BIKE & PEDESTRIAN WAYFINDING SIGN DESIGN | CONCEPT DESIGN | 07.31.15 | ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN

WAYFINDING CONCEPT DESIGN
This package presents concept designs for bicycle and pedestrian wayfinding signs and bike map. The concepts build upon the guidance provided by Transit Agency of Monterey County (TAMC) Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee and TAMC staff.

COMMON ELEMENTS FOR SIGN CONCEPTS:

Ū Based on the preferred “Mountains to Sea” color palette Ū Provide guidance for implementing a cohesive County-wide sign system while providing flexibility for local jurisdictions to choose wayfinding elements that fit within the local community context.

Ū Provide opportunities to incorporate City names and logos on sign elements Ū Provide for 2” minimum font height for destination names on signs to be read when bicyclists are in motion.

SIGN CONCEPT OVERVIEW:

MOUNTAINS TO SEA COLOR PALETTES

WAYFINDING CONCEPT DESIGN
Elements within each concept can be combined to form a preferred option. 1- EXPLORE MONTEREY COUNTY - MODERN CONTEMPORARY
Ū “Explore Monterey County” by walking and biking logo developed as a unifying theme. Directional signs compare to options 2 and 3 on the CAMUTCD spectrum. 2- EXPLORE MONTEREY COUNTY - GROUNDED CONTEMPORARY
Ū A compass rose icon used as a unifiying theme. Unique colors identify County identified bike routes. Directional signs compare to options 2 and 3 on the CAMUTCD spectrum.
3- MONTEREY COUNTY REGIONAL ICONS
Ū Features four icons representing the coast, the mountains, vineyards and agricultural lands. Directional sign options compare to option 1 on the CAMUTCD spectrum (FHWA approved). Sign toppers highlight County and local branding. 208
10’
11’
12’
9’
8’
7’
6’
5’
4’
3’
1’
2’

EXPLORE MONTEREY COUNTY

MODERN CONTEMPORARY
Destination I
Milage Time in Mins
Milage Time in Mins
Milage Time in Mins
Destination II
Destination III
Fort Ord Loop
SALINAS 1/2
3 2

MILECOASTAL PATH

10.5 SALINAS

YOU ARE HERE STREET NAME

STREET NAME

STREET NAME

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

STREET NAME
5 MINUTE WALK
Destination I
Milage Time in Mins
Milage Time in Mins
Milage Time in Mins
Destination II
Destination III

FORT ORD LOOP

SALINAS

SALINAS
E��l���
E��l���
E��l���
E��l���
E��l���
Duis aute irure
Duis aute irure
Walk from here
2 mins walk
Lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor
2 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Duis aute irure
Duis aute irure
Ride your bike from here
2 mins walk
Lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor
2 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
E��l���

SALINAS

SALINAS

SALINAS
E��l���

SALINAS
E��l���

SALINAS
1 MONTEREY COUNTY BIKE & PEDESTRIAN WAYFINDING SIGN DESIGN | CONCEPT DESIGN | 07.31.15 | ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN

EXPLORE MONTEREY COUNTY - MODERN CONTEMPORARY
The contemporary concepts take a modern approach using brushed stainless steel, concrete and painted metal. An “Explore Monterey County” logo has been drafted as a way to tie together the County Routes.

CAST CONCRETE

BASE WITH

ETCHED CITY
SEAL

DESTINATION NAME,

MILAGE AND TIME IN

MINUTES

PAINTED ACRYLIC

MAP PANEL

LIST OF LOCAL

DESTINATIONS

WITH DISTANCES

AND TRAVEL TIMES
LOCAL

INFORMATION

PAINTED

GALVANIZED

STEEL POST

VINYL DECAL

GATEWAY

MONUMENT DIRECTIONAL SIGN TRAIL POST SIGN TOPPER

BRUSHED

STAINLESS
STEEL
CAST

MONOLITHIC

CONCTRETE
POWDERCOATED SHEET
METAL

PRIMARY

MATERIALS

WEATHERVANE

NAVIGATIONAL

ELEMENT
ROUTE
NAME
CUSTOM
PLAQUE

OPTIONS
PLAQUE

OPTIONS
VINYAL
COATED
POLE

GREEN AND WHITE

OPTION WITH CITY

NAME AND SEAL
209
10’
11’
12’
9’
8’
7’
6’
5’
4’
3’
1’
2’

EXPLORE MONTEREY COUNTY

OLD WORLD CONTEMPORARY
Destination I
Milage Time in Mins
Milage Time in Mins
Milage Time in Mins
Destination II
Destination III

FORT ORD LOOP

SALINAS
Destination
Destination
Road Name
Destination I
Mileage Time in Mins
Mileage Time in Mins
Destination II
Destination III

FORT ORD LOOP
MILE

10.5 E��l���
SALINAS E��l���

SALINAS
ARTS

DISTRICT

SALINAS

YOU ARE HERE STREET NAME

STREET NAME

STREET NAME

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

STREET NAME
5 MINUTE WALK
E��l���
SALINAS E��l���
N
S
W
E
Fort Ord Loop

FORT ORD LOOP

FORT ORD LOOP
2 MONTEREY COUNTY BIKE & PEDESTRIAN WAYFINDING SIGN DESIGN | CONCEPT DESIGN | 07.31.15 | ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN The Grounded Contemporary concept has a warmer approach featuring a compass rose theme pairing clean lines with the rough, tactile texture of corten steel.

EXPLORE MONTEREY COUNTY - GROUNDED CONTEMPORARY

CORTEN STEEL

PAINTED

ALUMINUM
CAST

CONCRETE

PRIMARY

MATERIALS

GATEWAY

MONUMENT DIRECTIONAL SIGN TRAIL POST SIGN TOPPER
CAST

CONCRETE
BASE

LASER CUT

CORTEN STEEL
PANEL

LASER CUT

CORTEN STEEL
PANEL

PRINTED ACRYLIC

MAP PANEL

DESTINATION NAME,

MILAGE AND TIME IN

MINUTES

ROUTE NAME

WITH COLOR
PLAQUE

COLOR TO

MATCH ROUTE
NAME

ALTERNATIVE

SIGN TOPPER

DESIGNS

OPPORTUNITY FOR

UNIQUE COLOR TO BRAND

COUNTY IDENTIFIED

ROUTES, CORESPONDS

WITH BIKE MAP
210
10’
11’
12’
9’
8’
7’
6’
5’
4’
3’
1’
2’
Coast
Mountains
Agriculture
Vineyards

VINEYARD BIKE ROUTE

VINEYARD BIKE ROUTE
1/2
3 2
Destination II
Destination I
Destination III
1/2
3 2
Destination II
Destination I
Destination III

CARMEL VALLEY

CARMEL VALLEY CARMEL VALLEY
1/2
3 2
Destination II
Destination I
Destination III
1/2
3 2
Destination II
Destination I
Destination III

COASTAL PATH
MILE

10.5 MONTEREY
COUNTY

REGIONS

CARMEL VALLEY

CARMEL VALLEY

YOU ARE HERE STREET NAME

STREET NAME

STREET NAME

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

STREET NAME
5 MINUTE WALK

CARMEL VALLEY
E��l���
Duis aute irure
Duis aute irure
Walk from here
2 mins walk
Lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor
2 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk

CARMEL VALLEY
3 MONTEREY COUNTY BIKE & PEDESTRIAN WAYFINDING SIGN DESIGN | CONCEPT DESIGN | 07.31.15 | ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN The Regional Icon concept features iconic elements representing the main regions of Monterey County; the coast, the mountains, vineyards, and agricultural lands.

MONTEREY COUNTY REGIONAL ICONS

PAINTED

METAL, TBD

WOOD OR

RECYCLED
LUMBER

PRIMARY

MATERIALS

GATEWAY

MONUMENT DIRECTIONAL SIGN TRAIL POST SIGN TOPPER

FHWA APPROVED MUCTD

MODIFIED BICYCLE

DESTINATION SIGN

CAMUCTD BICYCLE

DESTINATION SIGN

EXAMPLE ICONS

FOR COASTAL,

AGRICULTURE AND

MOUNTAINOUS AREAS

JET CUT ALUMINUM PLATE,

ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS AND

COLORS POSSIBLE

WOOD OR

RECYCLED

LUMBER POST

ALUMINUM
PLAQUE

OPTION FOR UNIQUE

COLOR PLAQUE TO MATCH

BIKE ROUTE

OPTION FOR UNIQUE

COLOR VINYL DECAL

JET CUT

ALUMINUM PLATE,

PAINTED
LOCAL

INFORMATION

VINYL DISTRICT/

TRAIL MAP
211
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
47 | P a g e
Appendix C – Final Wayfinding Sign Designs and Placement Scenarios 212

BIKE & PEDESTRIAN WAYFINDING SIGN DESIGN
Monterey County
MARCH 2016
213
MONTEREY COUNTY BIKE & PEDESTRIAN WAYFINDING SIGN DESIGN | MARCH 2016 | ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN

WAYFINDING CONCEPT DESIGN
This package presents preferred concept designs for regional bicycle and pedestrian wayfinding signs. Through a public engagement process led by the Transportation Agency of Monterey County (TAMC) and a series of work sessions with the TAMC Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee a final design was developed that is a reflection of the County’s community assets. Standards, unique branding, visibility, and cost were considered when developing and finalizing the sign family. This suite of options is both durable and flexible. It uses materials that resist the natural elements and deter vandalism. In addition, this design considers modular components that may be fabricated and maintained by City facilities staff.

The “Explore Monterey County” theme draws upon the environment that makes Monterey County unique; the mountains, agriculture, vineyards, and the sea. A mountains to sea color palette was selected to highlight these assets. The signage family provides guidance for implementing a cohesive county-wide sign system while providing flexibility for local jurisdictions to choose wayfinding elements that fit within the local community context. The family also provides opportunities to incorporate City names and logos on sign elements.

WAYFINDING CONCEPT DESIGN
Destination I
Destination II
Destination III
MARINA
1 MILES 20 MIN
2 MILES
3 MILES
40 MIN
18 MIN 120 MIN
12 MIN
6 MIN

YOU ARE HERE STREET NAME

STREET NAME

STREET NAME

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

STREET NAME
5 MINUTE WALK
Duis aute irure
Duis aute irure
Walk from here
2 mins walk
Lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor
2 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Duis aute irure
Duis aute irure
Ride your bike from here
2 mins walk
Lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor
2 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
SALINAS E��l���

SALINAS
E��l���

SALINAS
ARTS

DISTRICT

YOU ARE HERE STREET NAME

STREET NAME

STREET NAME

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

STREET NAME
5 MINUTE WALK
E��l���

SALINAS
214
FONTS
Direction Sign Typography
Kiosk Typography
Sign Topper Design Kiosk Topper Design Compass Design
Kiosk Destination Distance Typography
Sign faces to be retroflective for low light and nighttime visibility.

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
1234567890

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
1234567890

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
1234567890

HIGHWAY GOTHIC
COLOR
COLOR
KIOSK OPTION 2
KIOSK OPTION 1

GREEN/WHITE

LASER CUT

GREEN/WHITE

HIGHWAY GOTHIC EXPANDED
UNIVERS LT STD 59 ULTRA CONDENSED
Font: Segoe Script

ARTWORK

SALINAS

GRAPHIC STANDARDS
COLORS
C=11 M=46 Y=99 K=1
C=61 M=24 Y=72 K=4
C=72 M=42 Y=100 K=35
C=63 M=27 Y=0 K=0
C=88 M=59 Y=22 K=4
1 215
10’
11’
12’
9’
8’
7’
6’
5’
4’
3’
1’
2’

EXPLORE MONTEREY COUNTY

DESTINATION SIGNS
Destination I
Destination II
Destination III
MARINA
1 MILES 20 MIN
2 MILES
3 MILES
40 MIN
18 MIN 120 MIN
12 MIN
6 MIN
Destination I
Destination II
Destination III

SOLEDAD
1 MILES
2 MILES
3 MILES 18 MIN
12 MIN
6 MIN

SALINAS
16”
4”
22”
22”
24”
4”
24”
8”
33”
Destination I
Destination II
Destination III

SALINAS
Destination I
Destination II
Destination III
1 2.5
3 SALINAS
2 WAYFINDING SIGNS
Direction Signs and Confirmation Signs
The concepts below provide modular components to provide flexibility for the various jurisdictions in the County while maintaining consistency along County routes. Two sign topper designs have options for a full color or a green and white topper. Direction and confirmation sign “1” uses CAMUTCD standard bike guide sign plaques. Direction signs “2A” and “2B” use a modified CAMUTCD guide sign where city name, distance, and travel time to destinations is provided.

Description
Destination signs inform people riding bikes or walking of the designated regional route to access key destinations. The signs mark the junction of two or more regional bikeways or pedestrian routes. Each sign has space for a maximum of three destinations. Travel times for bicycles and pedestrians are optional but recommended.

Confirmation signs indicate to people walking and riding bikes that they are on a designated County Route.

Placement
Direction signs are to be placed on the near-side of intersections in advance of a junction with another bicycle or pedestrian route. They can also be placed along a route to indicate a nearby destination.

Sign toppers can be placed along a route to provide supporting confirmation to users that they are on a County route.

Confirmation sign 1 (D1-3) can be used in conjunction with Direction sign 1 (D1-3A).

Sign Details
Ū All signs are 2’ wide with bottom of sign 7’ from the ground.

Ū Destination text to be 2” minimum height and distance letter height to be 1.25” minimum height.

Ū All lettering and symbols to be retroreflective.

Ū Aluminum sign panel, 1/4” corner radius, typical.

Ū Front of sign to be screened, all exposed surfaces to be painted.

Ū A casual pace travel time of 6 minutes per mile (10 mph) should be used for bicyclist time estimates and 20 minutes per mile (3 mph) for pedestrian time estimates.

DESTINATION

NAME, MILEAGE

AND TIME IN

MINUTES FOR

BIKES AND

PEDESTRIANS

FOR USE ALONG

SHARED-USE PATHS

OR BIKE & PEDESTRIAN

CORRIDORS

FOR USE ALONG

BIKE ROUTES

DESTINATION

NAME, MILEAGE

AND TIME IN

MINUTES FOR
BIKES
SIGN TOPPER 1A:

COLOR
OPTION 1 OPTION 2
SIGN TOPPER 2A:

COLOR
SIGN TOPPER 1B:

GREEN & WHITE
SIGN TOPPER 2B:

GREEN & WHITE
SIGN TOPPER 1A:

COLOR
DIRECTION SIGN 1:

CAMUTCD D1-3
DIRECTION SIGN 2A:

MODIFIED CAMUTCD
DIRECTION SIGN 2B:

MODIFIED CAMUTCD
CONFIRMATION SIGN:

CAMUTCD D11-1
CONFIRMATION SIGN 1:

CAMUTCD D1-3A

COMMUNITY

NAME ON

SIGN TOPPER

ALLOWS GUIDE

SIGN TO BE

CA MUTCD

STANDARD
SIGN

CA MUTCD

STANDARD

BIKE GUIDE

SIGN OPTION
216
10’
11’
12’
9’
8’
7’
6’
5’
4’
3’
1’
2’

EXPLORE MONTEREY COUNTY

PEDSTRIAN KIOSK OPTIONS

YOU ARE HERE STREET NAME

STREET NAME

STREET NAME

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

STREET NAME
5 MINUTE WALK
Duis aute irure
Duis aute irure
Walk from here
2 mins walk
Lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor
2 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Duis aute irure
Duis aute irure
Ride your bike from here
2 mins walk
Lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor
2 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk

SALINAS SALINAS
Duis aute irure
Duis aute irure
Walk from here
2 mins walk
Lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor
2 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Duis aute irure
Duis aute irure
Ride your bike from here
2 mins walk
Lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor
2 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk

SALINAS
ARTS

DISTRICT

SALINAS
ARTS

DISTRICT

YOU ARE HERE STREET NAME

STREET NAME

STREET NAME

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

STREET NAME
5 MINUTE WALK

SALINAS

SALINAS
6”
E��l��� E��l���
E��l��� SALINAS E��l���
8’-0”
3’-10”
26”
7’-6”
1’-6”
3”
4”
8”
6”
1’-0”
1’-10”
2’-1”
6”
6”
6’-9”
1’-0”
1’-3”
25” 26”
16”
2 WAYFINDING SIGNS
Description
Pedestrian Kiosks are freestanding two-sided information displays that orient users to Monterey County’s regional bicycle and pedestrian routes. Kiosks provide regional and local maps, destinations, rules of use, and safety information. A detailed map should show the local district or trail, indicating “you are here”, highlight major/minor access points, landmarks, restrooms and other trail and on-street bikeway networks.

The kiosk could provide additional information on local destinations within a 5 minute ride or 10 minute walk from the current location. The kiosk is also an opportunity to illustrate ecological, historical or cultural interpretive information of the local area.

Placement
Kiosks can be located at trailheads, trail access points and selected public gathering spaces. The Kiosk should be setback from the path a minimum of 3 feet to provide space for people to read and consider the information without blocking the trail. A minimum of 3 feet should also be provided for each side of the mapboard per accessibility guidelines.

Sign Details
Design material options available for the Kiosks detailed below:

Pedestrian Kiosk
Two kiosk options showcase the look of corten steel (or faux corten steel finish) and painted aluminum. Jurisdictions can select the preferred material based on the proposed location of the kiosk.

KIOSK 1

SIDE FRONT BACK SIDE FRONT BACK
KIOSK 2

CAST CONCRETE BASE

WITH STAMPED COMPASS

ROSE ORIENTED NORTH
LOGO

LOGO CITY/TRAIL
NAME

REPLACEABLE

LOCAL MAP

PRINTED ACRYLIC

ON ALUMINUM PANEL REGIONAL

BIKE MAP

INTERPRETIVE
INFO
CITY/
TRAIL
NAME
TRAIL/
CITY
INFO
CITY
LOGO/
SEAL

LASER CUT

CORTEN STEEL
PANEL

DESTINATION

BIKE DISTANCE/
TIME
TRAIL/

CITY INFO

DESTINATION
WALK

DISTANCE/TIME

LOCAL MAP

DESTINATION WALK

DISTANCE/TIME

DESTINATION BIKE

DISTANCE/TIME
Corten Steel Faux Corten
Steel Finish
Painted Aluminum
PROS • Strong, durable material.
• Capable of conveying a
warm, natural feel as well as
longevity and permanence
• Unique custom shapes
possible
• Low maintenance
• Strong,
durable
material
• Lightweight
• Less expensive
than corten
• Strong, durable
material
• Lightweight
• Less expensive than
corten
• Low maintenance
CONS • Unpredictable weathering
process
• Rust may run and stain
adjacent surfaces
• Visibility of cut-out style
can be compromised
depending on the background
environment
• Highest cost
• Quality of faux
finish may not
compare to
Corten
• Lacks warm, natural
feel
217
10’
11’
12’
9’
8’
7’
6’
5’
4’
3’
1’
2’

EXPLORE MONTEREY COUNTY

POST OPTIONS
MILE

10.5 SALINAS
E��l���
1’-6”

CLEARANCE
FROM
BOTTOM
4’-6”
10” 10”
Drinking
Water
Information
First Aid
Telephone
Picnic Site
Restaurant/
Food
Restrooms
Campground
Pets on Leash
Horse Trail
Wildlife
Viewing

DIGITAL VINYL

DESTINATION

ICON AND
ARROW

CITY OR

TRAIL NAME

DIGITAL VINYL

MILE MARKER
10” X 10” ALUMINUM

POST PAINTED BLUE

DIGITAL VINYL
LOGO
2 WAYFINDING SIGNS
Description
Pedestrian directional posts provide en route reassurance of trail identity and inform users they are on the designated regional route. They display the “Explore Monterey County” brand and trail name. The pedestrian directional posts also provide space for supplemental directional arrows to help users stay on the identified regional route.

Pedestrian directional posts can also serve as mile markers. Mile markers are a small feature with large significance and are an important element of wayfinding along pathways. They allow users to track how far they have traveled and help people put their location in context by matching the marker to a map. Most trail users identify strongly with distance from home, distance from their favorite place, or simply with knowing a certain location based on its relationship to a mile point.

Knowing one’s location on a trail is critical to assisting emergency responders trying to locate a person in distress. Mile markers could also be provided as a pavement marking.

Placement
Place pedestrian directional posts at minor pathway access points, intersections with other trails or when a direction sign is not used and at locations where the route is not explicit. Mile markers should be located at half to two mile intervals along the corridor.

Sign Details
Ū Painted Aluminum with digital vinyl icons and lettering Pedestrian Directional Post

FRONT SIDE OPTIONAL ICONS
218
3 SIGN PLACEMENT
The Monterey County wayfinding elements should be
located in a consistent manner across all jurisdictions.

The following diagrams represent typical sign placement scenarios seen throughout Monterey County.
• Downtown Pedestrian / Bike Route Intersection
• On-Street Bike Route
• On-Street Shared-Use Path Connection
• Shared-Use Path Intersection
Per both the CA MUTCD and the California Highway
Design Manual, the nearest edge of any sign should be
a minimum of two feet from the edge of the shareduse path, 3 feet preferred. The lowest sign edge shall be seven feet. Follow local agency design standards for on-street signs.

Sign Placement

BIKE ROUTE

BIKE ROUTE

STREET NAME

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION
K
C
D
C
C
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Downtown Pedestrian/Bike Route Intersection
K- Kiosk
In downtown pedestrian areas, kiosks
should be placed in selected public
gathering spaces along regional
routes. It is an opportunity to display
the Monterey County map and
interpretive information.

D- Direction Signs
Direction signs should be placed
advance of turns to local destinations
and services.

C- Confirmation Signs
Confirmation signs indicate to
bicyclists that they are on a
designated bikeway. They can be
placed every 2 to 3 blocks along
regional bike routes. They should be
placed soon after turns to confirm
the intended direction was taken.

The “Explore Monterey County” sign
topper can be used as a confirmation
sign. Confirmation sign 1 (D1-3a) can
be used in conjunction with direction
sign 1 (D1-3).
219
SIGN PLACEMENT 3
D- Direction Signs
Direction signs should be placed in
advance of turns to local destinations
and services.

On-Street Bike Route

BIKE ROUTE

BIKE ROUTE
On-Street Connection
D
D
D
D C
C
C
C
C
*Refer to California MUTCD Chapter 9B for current
setback requirements for signs from intersections.

Type Sign Type Design Standards Placement
Confirmation
Sign
Ū Explore Monterey
County Sign Topper
Ū Monterey County
Confirmation Sign 1:

CA MUTCD D1-3a
(destinations with
mileage)
Ū Opportunities to add
Explore Monterey County
sign topper to existing bike
and pedestrian signs where
appropriate.

Ū One sign per ¼ directional
mile (mid-block) and
at the far side of key
intersections
Decision Signs Ū Direction Sign 1:

CAMUTCD D1-3
(destinations with
arrow)
Ū Monterey County
Direction Sign 2A
and 2B: Modified

CAMUTCD
Ū Maximum of three
destinations per plaque
Ū Destinations shall use upper
case and lower case letters
Ū For destination names
that do not fit on one line
abbreviations or two-line
entry may be used
Ū Destinations shall be listed
by closest proximity to the
sign placement
Ū Left and straight arrows shall
be aligned left on the sign;
right arrows shall be aligned
to the right
Ū Signs should be placed the
at the following distances
before an intersection
depending on the number
of lanes a bicyclist must
travel across in order to
initiate a legal left turn:

Ū 25 feet before a zero lane
merge
Ū 100 feet before a one
lane merge
Ū 200 feet before a two
lane merge
C- Confirmation Signs
Confirmation signs indicate to
bicyclists that they are on a
designated bikeway. They can be
placed every 2 to 3 blocks along
regional bike routes. They should
be placed soon after turns to
The typical pattern for on-street wayfinding signs includes a direction sign prior to the intersection of route options, followed by an optional confirmation sign. The table below provides design and placement standards for the on-street bikeway sign types. confirm the intended direction was
taken. The “Explore Monterey
County” sign topper can be used as a
confirmation sign. Confirmation sign
1 (D1-3a) can be used in conjunction
with direction sign 1 (D1-3).
220

SIGN PLACEMENT
On-Street Shared-Use Path Connection STOP
STOP
100' Min.
100' Min.

SB = Street Banner
I= Arrival Identity
K = Trailhead Kiosk
M = Mapboard
D= Direction Sign
C= Conrmation Marker
G-1 = On-Street Guide
Conrmations
G-2= Turn Sign
G-3= Decision Sign
SS= Street Sign
On-Street Connection
P
D
D
P
D
D
D
D
D
K
D
STOP
STOP
D
D
D
D
D D
At-Grade Crossing & Trail Intersection
K
P
P
P
P
P
Shared-Use Path Intersection
K- Kiosk
Place kiosks at access points of shared-use
paths. It is an opportunity to display the
Monterey County map and interpretive
information.

D- Direction Signs
Direction signs should be placed advance of
turns to local destinations and services.

P- Pedestrian Directional Post
Posts reinforce the identity and direction
along a shared-use path.

K- Kiosk
Place kiosks at the intersection of connecting shareduse paths. It is an opportunity to display the Monterey County map and interpretive information.

D- Direction Signs
Direction signs should be placed advance of turns to
local destinations and services.

P- Pedestrian Directional Post
Posts reinforce the identity and direction along a
shared-use path.
3 221

YOU ARE HERE STREET NAME

STREET NAME

STREET NAME

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

STREET NAME
5 MINUTE WALK
Duis aute irure
Duis aute irure
Walk from here
2 mins walk
Lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor
2 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Duis aute irure
Duis aute irure
Ride your bike from here
2 mins walk
Lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor
2 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk

SALINAS
Destination I
Destination II
Destination III
MARINA
1 MILES 20 MIN
2 MILES
3 MILES
40 MIN
18 MIN 120 MIN
12 MIN
6 MIN
Destination I
Destination II
Destination III

SOLEDAD
1 MILES
2 MILES
3 MILES 18 MIN
12 MIN
6 MIN
SALINAS E��l���

SALINAS
ARTS

DISTRICT

YOU ARE HERE STREET NAME

STREET NAME

STREET NAME

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

STREET NAME
5 MINUTE WALK
E��l���

SALINAS
SALINAS E��l���
Destination I
Destination II
Destination III

SALINAS
Destination I
Destination II
Destination III
1 2.5
3 YOU ARE HERE STREET NAME

STREET NAME

STREET NAME

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

STREET NAME
5 MINUTE WALK
Duis aute irure
Duis aute irure
Walk from here
2 mins walk
Lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor
2 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Duis aute irure
Duis aute irure
Ride your bike from here
2 mins walk
Lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor
2 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk

SALINAS
Destination I
Destination II
Destination III
MARINA
1 MILES 20 MIN
2 MILES
3 MILES
40 MIN
18 MIN 120 MIN
12 MIN
6 MIN
Destination I
Destination II
Destination III

SOLEDAD
1 MILES
2 MILES
3 MILES 18 MIN
12 MIN
6 MIN
SALINAS E��l���

SALINAS
ARTS

DISTRICT

YOU ARE HERE STREET NAME

STREET NAME

STREET NAME

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

STREET NAME
5 MINUTE WALK
E��l���

SALINAS E
Destination I
Destination II
Destination III

SALINAS
Destination I
Destination II
Destination III
1 2.5
3 YOU ARE HERE STREET NAME

STREET NAME

STREET NAME

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

STREET NAME
5 MINUTE WALK
Duis aute irure
Duis aute irure
Walk from here
2 mins walk
Lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor
2 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Duis aute irure
Duis aute irure
Ride your bike from here
2 mins walk
Lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor
2 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk

SALINAS
Destination I
Destination II
Destination III
MARINA
1 MILES 20 MIN
2 MILES
3 MILES
40 MIN
18 MIN 120 MIN
12 MIN
6 MIN
Destination I
Destination II
Destination III

SOLEDAD
1 MILES
2 MILES
3 MILES 18 MIN
12 MIN
6 MIN
SALINAS E��l���

SALINAS
ARTS

DISTRICT

YOU ARE HERE STREET NAME

STREET NAME

STREET NAME

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

STREET NAME
5 MINUTE WALK
E��l���

SALINAS
Destination I
Destination II
Destination III

SALINAS
Destination I
Destination II
Destination III
1 2.5
3 YOU ARE HERE STREET NAME

STREET NAME

STREET NAME

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION
DESTI

DESTINATION

STREET NAME
5 MINUTE WALK
Duis aute irure
Duis aute irure
Walk from here
2 mins walk
Lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor
2 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Duis aute irure
Duis aute irure
Ride your bike from here
2 mins walk
Lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor
2 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk

SALINAS
Destination I
Destination II
Destination III
MARINA
1 MILES 20 MIN
2 MILES
3 MILES
40 MIN
18 MIN 120 MIN
12 MIN
6 MIN
Destination I
Destination II
Destination III

SOLEDAD
1 MILES
2 MILES
3 MILES 18 MIN
12 MIN
6 MIN
SALINAS E��l�

SALINAS
ARTS

DISTRICT

YOU ARE HERE STREET NAME

STREET NAME

STREET NAME

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

STREET NAME
5 MINUTE WALK
E��l���

SALINAS
Destination I
Destination II
Destination III

SALINAS
Destination I
Destination II
Destination III
1 2.5
3 Destination Sign
Option 1A
Destination Sign
Option 1B
Destination Sign
Option 2A
Destination Sign
Option 2B
COST ESTIMATES 4
Topper Only
$68.00
Sign Face Only
$90.00
Total Sign Only
$.00
Topper Only
$64.00
Sign Face Only
$90.00
Total Sign Only
$4.00
Topper Only
$58.00
Sign Face Only
$105.00
Total Sign Only
$.00
Topper Only
$56.00
Sign Face Only
$101.00
Total Sign Only
$.00
Note: This total does not include costs for installation.

Installation cost will vary depending
on pole hardware, need for concrete footer and use of
a third-party contrator or local jurisdiction staff.

April 2016 cost estimate provided by
AD/S COMPANIES www.ad-s.com
222

YOU ARE HERE STREET NAME

STREET NAME

STREET NAME

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

STREET NAME
5 MINUTE WALK
Duis aute irure
Duis aute irure
Walk from here
2 mins walk
Lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor
2 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Duis aute irure
Duis aute irure
Ride your bike from here
2 mins walk
Lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor
2 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk

SALINAS
ation I
ation II
on III
DAD
N
2 MIN
6 MIN
SALINAS E��l���

SALINAS
ARTS

DISTRICT

YOU ARE HERE STREET NAME

STREET NAME

STREET NAME

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

STREET NAME
5 MINUTE WALK
E��l���

SALINAS
E��l���

YOU ARE HERE STREET NAME

STREET NAME

STREET NAME

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

STREET NAME
5 MINUTE WALK
Duis aute irure
Duis aute irure
Walk from here
2 mins walk
Lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor
2 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Duis aute irure
Duis aute irure
Ride your bike from here
2 mins walk
Lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor
2 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk

SALINAS
Destination I
Destination II
stination III

SOLEDAD
MILES
MILES
ES 18 MIN
12 MIN
6 MIN
SALINAS E��l���

SALINAS
ARTS

DISTRICT

YOU ARE HERE STREET NAME

STREET NAME

STREET NAME

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

STREET NAME
5 MINUTE WALK
E��l���

SALINAS
E��l���

YOU ARE HERE STREET NAME

STREET NAME

STREET NAME

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

STREET NAME
5 MINUTE WALK
Duis aute irure
Duis aute irure
Walk from here
2 mins walk
Lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor
2 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Duis aute irure
Duis aute irure
Ride your bike from here
2 mins walk
Lorem ipsum dolor
Lorem ipsum dolor
2 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk
Ad minim veniamt 5 mins walk
5 mins walk

SALINAS
tination I
tination II
ation III
ARINA
S 20 MIN
S
40 MIN
18 MIN 120 MIN
12 MIN
6 MIN
Destination I
Destination II
Destination III

SOLEDAD
1 MILES
2 MILES
3 MILES 18 MIN
12 MIN
6 MIN
SALINAS E��l���

SALINAS
ARTS

DISTRICT

YOU ARE HERE STREET NAME

STREET NAME

STREET NAME

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

DESTINATION

STREET NAME
5 MINUTE WALK
E��l���

SALINAS
E��l���
Kiosk Option 1 Kiosk Option 2 Pedestrian
Directional Post
COST ESTIMATES 4
Total Cost
$2,350.00
Total Cost
$6,350.00
Corten Steel
$6,850.00
Faux Corten Steel
$5,700.00
Note: Singular item pricing.

April 2016 cost estimate provided by
AD/S COMPANIES www.ad-s.com
223
Regional Bicycle & Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County May 2016
59 | P a g e
Appendix D – Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes 224
P:\Work Program\Bike Ped\Wayfinding Plan\Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee\Meetings\Meeting 2\Minutes_Meeting 1_AG.docx
Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee
Tuesday, February 10, 2015
1:35 p.m. – 2:35 p.m.

Call in: (760)569-0800 Participant Code:580128#
Transportation Agency for Monterey County—Conference Room 55-B Plaza Circle, Salinas, CA 93901-2902

1. Welcome & Introductions
Committee members present:

Eric Peterson Fort Ord Friends Trails, and Pedal Alpini Lisa Rheinheimmer Monterey-Salinas Transit
D.L. Johnson TAMC Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Advisory Committee
Jeanette Pantoja Building Healthy Communities
Eliza Yu Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments
Bill Boosman Velo Club Monterey
James Serrano City of Salinas
Justin Meek City of Marina
Krista Hanni Monterey County Health Department
Daniel Gho (by phone) City of Pacific Grove
Kevin Cole (by phone) Pebble Beach
Brent Slama (by phone) City of Soledad
Todd Bodem (by phone) City of Sand City
Ryan Chapman (by phone) County of Monterey Public Works Andrea Renny (small group meeting February
10, 2015)
City of Monterey
Bernard Green (small group meeting February
10, 2015)
California State University, Monterey Bay
TAMC staff present:

Debbie Hale, Executive Director Todd Muck, Deputy Executive Director Ariana Green, Associate Transportation Planner Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner
Others present:

Cory Caletti (by phone) Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission
225
P:\Work Program\Bike Ped\Wayfinding Plan\Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee\Meetings\Meeting 2\Minutes_Meeting 1_AG.docx

2. Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee Purpose Pages 1-4 Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, reviewed the purpose of the ad-hoc Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee. Ms. Murillo noted that the purpose of the Committee is to assist staff with the development of the Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Wayfinding Plan that will provide standard guidelines for bicycle and pedestrian wayfinding signage throughout Monterey County.

She noted that Committee members are expected to provide input on the content of the plan, the content of the wayfinding sign design and will assist staff in soliciting public input. Ms. Murillo also reviewed the Committee meeting schedule, noting that the committee is expected to meet biweekly from February to June.

In our small group meeting on Friday, February 10th, Committee member Andrea Renny suggested that as part of our Wayfinding Plan implementation strategies we look into using business improvement district funding for sign installation, and mentioned that we adhere to the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices guidelines on signage font sizes and signage placement.

3. Overview of Wayfinding Sign Programs Presentation
Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, presented an overview of wayfinding sign programs, including examples of gateway and directional signage, and reviewed the goals and timeline of the Wayfinding Plan.

Questions from the committee members:
 Will on-pavement markings be included in the plan? - Yes  Will there be a bike map that reflects the routes? - Yes There was difficulty setting up the telephone for conference calling, and participants were connected at approximately 1:45pm. The Committee had a second round of introductions, and Ms. Murillo quickly reviewed the committee purpose and wayfinding sign programs.

4. Develop Wayfinding Plan Purpose and Goals Page 5
Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, reviewed the draft Wayfinding Plan background, content and goals with the Committee and asked for Committee input.

Committee members offered the following input:
 The advisory committee should develop criteria to identify regional destinations  The Wayfinding Plan should encourage connectivity between communities, and provide connectivity to regional parks and open space, trails, educational institutions, employment centers, transit, park and ride lots and tourist destinations  Signage should: be accessible to people of all literacy levels, be legible for a wide range of users, clear and concise, demonstrate multimodal access, denote difficulty level for trails and ADA access, show where restrooms, bike shops and other bike-supportive amenities are, and have space for a city logo or identifier
 Sign design should be consistent/compatible across jurisdictional boundaries, including into Santa Cruz County and San Benito County
 Signs should be eye-catching as opposed to standard MUTCD signs which blend in 226
P:\Work Program\Bike Ped\Wayfinding Plan\Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee\Meetings\Meeting 2\Minutes_Meeting 1_AG.docx
 Signs should be distributed equitably across the County  Wayfinding signage should also incorporate technology, and be accessible via GPS and online (consider using existing apps/tech such as Strava and Google Multimodal Trip Planner)
 Staff and the Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee should maintain community engagement throughout the process
Committee member Bill Boosman also mentioned that wayfinding should not be restricted to signage, and that maps are also a part of wayfinding. He also mentioned that Map my Ride and Strava are examples of mobile apps that already exist to track routes. Ms. Murillo noted that a part of the Wayfinding Plan will be branding routes. Committee member James Serrano said this was a great idea, and that it is an opportunity for each city to promote its own identity.

In our small group meeting on Friday, February 10th, Committee member Andrea Renny suggested that we clarify that the Wayfinding Plan will “create safer pedestrian and bicyclists facilities by using signage to make routes more visible.”

5. Discussion Items:
a) Stakeholder Outreach
Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, noted that staff will begin using MindMixer (http://mindmixer.com/), which is an online public participation tool as an outreach tool to gather Committee and public feedback on the Wayfinding Plan.

Ms. Murillo asked the committee if there are special groups that staff should outreach to.

Committee members recommended that staff reach out to:
 MST’s Mobility Advisory Committee
 Caltrans District 5
 Business groups, such as Chambers of Commerce
 Regional Parks
 State Parks
 Monterey Peninsula College
 Local hospitals
 Monterey Off Road Cycling Association (MORCA)
 South County
In our small group meeting on Friday, February 10th, Committee member Andrea Renny suggested that staff present the draft Wayfinding Plan to city councils to receive feedback. Staff will be adding city council presentations to the Wayfinding Plan project timeline. She also suggested that we use Scribble Maps (http://scribblemaps.com/) as we identify regional routes and sign locations.
b) Site Visits to Identify Sign Locations and Routes
Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, noted that staff is interested in doing site visits to gather an inventory of existing signage as part of the planning process. She also noted that there is a free signage inventory iPhone/iPad app called GIS Assets 227
P:\Work Program\Bike Ped\Wayfinding Plan\Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee\Meetings\Meeting 2\Minutes_Meeting 1_AG.docx
(https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/gisassets/id723243246?mt=8) that staff will plan on using as part of the inventory process.

In our small group meeting on Friday, February 10th,Committee member Andrea Renny mentioned that the City of Monterey has an inventory of existing signage along the Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail.
c) Meeting Schedule and Location
Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, asked if this meeting time works best for everyone. Committee member Eric Peterson said Tuesday afternoon might not be the best time, as that is the Board of Supervisor’s meeting time. Ms. Murillo said that she will be sending out another Doodle poll for the next meeting.
228
P:\Work Program\Bike Ped\Wayfinding Plan\Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee\Meetings\Meeting 3\Minutes_Meeting

2.docx
Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee
Thursday, February 26, 2015
10:00a.m. - 11:00a.m.

Call in: (760)569-0800 Participant Code:580128#
Transportation Agency for Monterey County—Conference Room 55-B Plaza Circle, Salinas, CA 93901-2902

1. Welcome & Introductions
Committee members present:

Eric Petersen Fort Ord Friends Trails, and Pedal Alpini Lisa Rheinheimmer Monterey-Salinas Transit
Jeanette Pantoja Building Healthy Communities
Eliza Yu Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments
Josh Metz Fort Ord Re-use Authority
Brent Slama (by phone) City of Soledad
Andrea Renny City of Monterey
Bernard Green California State University, Monterey Bay Victoria Beach (by phone) City of Carmel-by-the-Sea
TAMC staff present:

Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation
Planner
Ariana Green, Associate Transportation Planner
Todd Muck, Deputy Executive Director
Others present:

2. Review Draft February 10, 2015 Meeting Minutes Pages 2-5 The Committee members did not have comments on the draft meeting minutes.

3. Review Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee membership Page 6 Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, noted that in the first meeting a Committee member asked about the membership of the Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee. She noted that the Committee membership list shows which stakeholder groups are represented on the Committee.

4. Finalize Wayfinding Plan Goals and Wayfinding Sign Design Pages 7-10 229
P:\Work Program\Bike Ped\Wayfinding Plan\Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee\Meetings\Meeting 3\Minutes_Meeting

2.docx
Criteria
Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, reviewed the revised draft Wayfinding Plan background, content and goals with the Committee and asked for Committee input.

Committee members offered the following input:
 Wayfinding Sign Design Criteria section goal #2 should include safety language, and indicate the use of symbology for legibility of signage  Wayfinding Sign Design Criteria section goal #4 should include comfort level  Wayfinding Sign Design Criteria section goal #7 should include “When applicable, wayfinding signage will be placed in accordance with the regulatory requirements spelled out in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.” Committee member Victoria Beach noted that she really liked the use of symbology, and distance and directional information in the Rochester wayfinding sign example that was shown at the February 10th meeting. Committee member Andrea Renny noted that we should use the wayfinding signage to capitalize on missed opportunities, such as areas of the Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail where tourists get lost, and routes such as Monterey to Marina and a route from North Monterey County and Big Sur.

5. Review Bicycle Facilities Classification Handout
Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, shared a handout from the City of Emeryville’s Resources for the Design of Bicycle Facilities Manual that outlined and described the three classes of bicycle facilities. She also mentioned that there are now Class IV bicycle facilities, and asked Committee member Bernard Green to share more about the new Class IV facilities. Committee member Bernard Green mentioned that Class IV facilities, also known as cycle tracks are bicycle paths that are protected from traffic. Committee member Eric Petersen expressed his concern about the design.

6. Develop Criteria for:
a) Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Routes
b) Regional Destinations
Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, reviewed the draft regional route and destination criteria and asked for Committee input. Ariana Green, Associate Transportation Planner, reminded the Committee that this is a regional project and the Committee will be asked to think about this project in a regional context. Ms. Green pointed out that some routes will cross through local cities, but noted that this project would not be focused on local city routes. Ms.

Murillo pointed out that because this is a regional project, the regional destinations would include areas like regional parks and colleges.

Committee member Bernard Green mentioned that it is still important to include local routes that continue on to become regional routes. Committee member Jeanette Pantoja mentioned that this would be a great opportunity to include South County routes. Committee member Brent Slama mentioned that a South County wine corridor could be a regional route in South County. Mr. 230
P:\Work Program\Bike Ped\Wayfinding Plan\Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee\Meetings\Meeting 3\Minutes_Meeting

2.docx
Slama mentioned that this route would follow River Road and continue on to Metz Trail. Another route he mentioned is the route to the Pinnacles National Monument, which would be along Metz Road. Committee member Victoria Beach noted that it would be interesting to see if the Committee could identify one continuous regional route for Monterey County.

Committee member Josh Metz mentioned that identifying routes is a task that can be efficiently accomplished by the Committee using large maps that identify existing bicycle facilities. Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, noted that this route mapping is a task that staff would like Committee members to complete before our next meeting, which will be a working meeting to identify regional routes.

7. Review Revised Meeting Schedule
Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, reviewed the revised meeting schedule with the Committee noting that the Committee would now be meeting monthly. She noted that she expects the Committee to begin meeting biweekly once a design consultant is chosen.

8. Discuss:
a) Route Mapping Activity
Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, asked Committee members to use the maps from the Transportation Agency’s 2011 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan to highlight the regional routes. Ms. Murillo mentioned that staff will work on enlarging the regional maps for the next meeting.
b)Meeting Schedule
Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, noted that she would be sending out another Doodle Poll to schedule the March meeting.
231
P:\Work Program\Bike Ped\Wayfinding Plan\Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee\Meetings\Minutes\Minutes_Meeting 3_AGedits.docx
Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee
Thursday, March 19, 2015
11:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.

Transportation Agency for Monterey County—Conference Room 55-B Plaza Circle, Salinas, CA 93901-2902
Minutes

1. Welcome & Introductions
Committee Members Present
Eliza Yu Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments
Bernard Green California State University, Monterey Bay Victoria Beach City of Carmel-by-the-Sea
Justin Meek City of Marina
Brent Slama City of Soledad
Ryan Chapman County of Monterey Public Works
Eric Petersen Fort Ord Recreation Trails Friends, and Pedal Alpini Josh Metz Fort Ord Reuse Authority
Lisa Rheinheimer Monterey-Salinas Transit
TAMC Staff Present
Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation
Planner
Ariana Green, Associate Transportation Planner
Todd Much, Deputy Executive Director

2. Review Draft February 26, 2015 Minutes Pages 2-4
Committee member Victoria Beach noted that she had phoned in for that meeting and was not listed as present. Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, corrected the meeting minutes to reflect this.
232
P:\Work Program\Bike Ped\Wayfinding Plan\Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee\Meetings\Minutes\Minutes_Meeting 3_AGedits.docx

3. MindMixer Training
www.Tamc.MindMixer.com
Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, walked the Committee through the Wayfinding Plan MindMixer page. She mentioned that she would like to gather more input from Committee members and from members of the public using the MindMixer page. Committee member Bernard Green noted that the topic is text heavy, and it would be nice to keep the topic short. He also mentioned that it might be best to rename the bike classes so more people can understand the differences between the classes. Ms. Murillo noted she would work on making these changes.

4. Receive Update on Request for Proposals No Enclosure Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, provided an update to the Committee on the Request for Proposals (RFP) for the design of wayfinding signage and the update of the Monterey County bike map. She notified members that the review committee, comprised of Transportation Agency staff and Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee members, chose Alta Planning + Design.

Alta Planning + Design was the most experienced firm and offered additional items, such as cost comparison matrices for signage.

Committee member Josh Metz asked why Committee members were not notified of the RFP’s circulation. Ms. Murillo reported that the RFP had been out for the month of February, and that members of the Committee were invited to review the proposals. Committee member Bernard Green, who was part of the RFP review committee, noted that Alta Planning + Design was the highest ranked firm, and that some of the other proposals did not have as much experience with wayfinding signage for bicyclists and pedestrians. Committee members Lisa Rheinheimer and Victoria Beach mentioned that they have worked with Alta Planning + Design in the past and that they have been content with the firm’s work. Ms. Murillo mentioned that she would email the RFP to Committee member Josh Metz.

5. Review Regional Route Criteria Pages 5-7
Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, reminded the Committee about the route criteria noting that routes must be identified in the Transportation Agency’s 2011 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan classified as Class I, II, and III and planned Class I, II, III, and IV facilities.

The routes and destinations must be regional.

6. Identify Activity
i. Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Routes
ii. Regional Destinations
Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, asked Committee members to identify regional routes using map handouts that include bicycle facilities routes. Committee member Victoria Beach asked if certain areas of maps could be enlarged to make it easier to see. Ariana Green, Associate Transportation Planner, mentioned that the map is accessible online and may be found 233
P:\Work Program\Bike Ped\Wayfinding Plan\Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee\Meetings\Minutes\Minutes_Meeting 3_AGedits.docx
on TAMC’s MindMixer pager (http://tamc.mindmixer.com/). The Committee members spent the rest of the meeting identifying regional bike routes using the maps provided by TAMC staff.

Committee member Victoria Beach asked if staff could map the routes that committee members identified to make it easier for all to collaborate. Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, noted that she would try and consolidate the maps into one map that includes the routes identified by the Committee.

Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, thanked the Committee members for identifying regional routes.

6. Site Visit Sign-ups
There was no time to discuss this.
234
P:\Work Program\Bike Ped\Wayfinding Plan\Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee\Meetings\Meeting 5\Minutes_Meeting

4.docx
Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee
Thursday, April 23, 2015
10:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m.

Call in: (760)569-0800 Participant Code:580128#
*DIFFERENT LOCATION: City of Monterey—Orca Room
735 Pacific Street, Monterey
AGENDA

1. Welcome & Introductions
Committee Members Present
Victoria Beach City of Carmel-by-the-Sea
Ryan Chapman County of Monterey
Kevin Cole Pebble Beach
Andrea Renny City of Monterey
Josh Metz Fort Ord Reuse Authority
Eric Petersen Fort Ord Recreation Trails Friends, and Pedal Alpini Lisa Rheinheimmer Monterey-Salinas Transit
Krista Hanni (by phone) Monterey County Health Department Brent Slama City of Soledad
Staff Present
Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation
Planner
Ariana Green, Associate Transportation Planner

2. Review Draft March 19,2015 Minutes Pages 2-4
There were no comments on the March 19th meeting minutes. 235
P:\Work Program\Bike Ped\Wayfinding Plan\Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee\Meetings\Meeting 5\Minutes_Meeting

4.docx

3. Update on Consultant Timeline No Enclosure
Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, provided an update on Alta Planning + Design’s timeline, noting that the project is expected to wrap up in September. Ms. Murillo noted that the Committee would likely meet during the week of May 18th to discuss the theme for the wayfinding signage, and that Alta Planning + Design would create draft designs based on the preferred theme during the month of June.

4. Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Routes and Destinations Activity a) Review Routes from March 19th Meeting
b) Discuss Route Limits: Length and Connectivity
c) Discuss Destinations
d) Discuss Route Branding
Ms. Murillo demonstrated the combined regional routes based on the Committee’s route map exercise activity. She asked the Committee for input on the preliminary routes, noting that there are route length and connectivity limitations. Committee members provided the following input:

Peninsula Routes:
 Include connection along Casa Verde Way in Monterey to connect the Peninsula Cities Route to the Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail
 Scenic Road in Carmel-by-the-Sea is one way, so consider adding a parallel route, such as San Antonio Street or Carmelo Street
 17 Mile Drive in Pebble Beach is narrow and may not be suitable for all riders but is one of the few routes between Pebble Beach and Carmel.
 Tehama Road is a private road, so there is no connection between Carmel Valley and the Peninsula through Tehama Road
 Include route from Sand City to Seaside that connects to the Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail
 Include a connection to Fort Ord via Ryan Ranch and South Boundary Road North County – Salinas Routes:
 Include a connection from Castroville to North Salinas via Espinosa Road  Connect the Prunedale-Salinas Route to San Miguel Canyon Road north of Prunedale  Consider a North Main Street Route in Salinas, as an alternative to taking Russell Road and San Juan Grade Road
 Include a connection from East Boronda Road to Old Stage Road via Natividad Road South County Routes:
 Prioritize River Road as a regional South County route Ms. Murillo mentioned that she received a comment requesting the consideration of a regional 236
P:\Work Program\Bike Ped\Wayfinding Plan\Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee\Meetings\Meeting 5\Minutes_Meeting

4.docx
route connecting the Soledad Mission to the San Antonio Mission. The Committee asked about connectivity to Pinnacles National Park from King City. Committee Member Ryan Chapman said he would look into which roads are County maintained roads in South County, which can help the Committee identify the most appropriate route for this connection. Committee Member Victoria Beach mentioned that the Big Sur Land Trust is planning an access point between Carmel and Palo Corona Regional Park as part of the Carmel River FREE project.

Committee Member Kevin Cole said he would be willing to do some reconnaissance work along the 17 Mile Drive route, and asked staff to look into apps, such as Map my Ride, that could help with this task. Committee Member Cole said it would be worthwhile for the Committee to take a ride on the suggested regional routes to get a better sense of their feasibility. Ariana Green, Associate Transportation Planner, and Ms. Murillo noted that staff would brainstorm and research some apps that might be appropriate for this and would send out more information to the Committee.

Ms. Murillo also noted that the regional routes map is accessible online through the MindMixer site.
237
1 Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee
Thursday, June 4, 2015
1:30p.m. – 3:00 p.m.

Call in: (760)569-0800 Participant Code:580128#
Transportation Agency for Monterey County —Conference Room 55-B Plaza Circle, Salinas

MINUTES

1. Welcome & Introductions
Committee Members Present
Kevin Cole Pebble Beach
Andrea Renny City of Monterey
Josh Metz Fort Ord Reuse Authority
Eric Petersen Fort Ord Recreation Trails Friends, and Pedal Alpini D.L. Johnson TAMC Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee
Justin Meek City of Marina
Brent Slama City of Soledad
Staff Present
Debbie Hale, Executive Director Ariana Green, Associate Transportation Planner Todd Muck, Deputy Executive Director Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner Others Present:

Jerry Landesman Mary Stewart, Alta Planning + Design
Linda Petersen (by phone) Emily Duchon, Alta Planning + Design 238
2 2. Review Draft April 23, 2015 Minutes
There were no comments on the April 23rd meeting minutes.

4. Wayfinding Visioning Exercise Activity
a) Project Overview
b) Introduction to Wayfinding
c) Wayfinding Strategy (Facilitated Discussion)
d) Wayfinding System (Breakout Exercise)
e) Next Steps
Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, introduced Mary Stewart and Emily Duchon, the wayfinding sign design consultants from Alta Planning + Design’s. Ms. Duchon provided a project overview, and discussed wayfinding principles with the Committee. Ms. Duchon and Ms. Stewart facilitated the discussion on choosing a preferred wayfinding sign design, color palette, and bike map design. More detailed visioning exercise notes are on the following page.

Visioning Meeting Goals:

The primary intent of the visioning meeting was to introduce the project stakeholders, learn about the Monterey County audience and what is currently effective and challenging in navigating the active transportation network and gather preferences regarding sign design

ITEM COMMENTS
Project Overview
 Mary Stewart, Alta Planning + Design’s Project
Manager, presented an overview of Alta’s
scope, schedule and workshop goals
Introduction to Wayfinding
 Emily Duchon, Alta’s Wayfinding Designer
presented a brief introduction to wayfinding
and discussed wayfinding principals, best
practices, and technical guidance
Wayfinding Strategy (Facilitated Discussion)
 Participants shared overall thoughts on the
existing active transportation network oMonterey County has a unique way of 239
3  What is the character and experience of the
pathway network?
--------------------------------------------------------  What existing navigational elements are
effective?
getting to destinations
oLimitation of connectivity
oScenic. Want to get out and absorb the
experience, like openness, vistas. Enjoy the
view.
oComfortable and safe
oPeople use trails for their health
oLots of families, enjoy the view, beauty
oDiversity of experiences
-------------------------------------------------
oSharrows and pavement markings on road.

They are easier to read and doesn’t compete
with sign clutter
oLike having minutes on sign. Account for
uphill riding.
oLike Portland, OR style signs with minutes.

Like pavement markings, good use when
routes jog/detour and are hard to track
oLike standard/not too creative signs for easy
use by visitors
oBe consistent with neighbors (adjacent
Counties)
oStrong hardware to keep from getting stolen
oAllow space for place name and logo for
each community.
oCity additions for existing route signs.

Include unincorporated communities.

Wayfinding System Input
The group broke out to participate in an interactive exercise to capture input on wayfinding design preferences. Three boards asked the advisory committee members to vote on preferred options for wayfinding themes, style and flexibility of sign design. In addition, participants were asked to provide 240
4 comments on the existing bicycle map.

Following the meeting the workshop boards were posted on the social media site MySidewalk to solicit additional input from committee members who were not able to attend in person. A summary of the input is outlined below.

Board 2: Wayfinding Style
Color Palette:

The top ranked preferred color
palettes are “Mountains to the Sea”
a more natural and muted palette
and “Vineyards” a more
contemporary palette.

Materials and Style:

Meeting participants leaned toward
the contemporary end of the design
spectrum with the layered and
textured aluminum style receiving
the most votes, and brushed
stainless steel and concrete and
colorful powdered coated steel one
vote behind.

TAMC Input:
o Color preference?
o Style Preference?
241
5 Board 3: Sign Design
Flexibility of Design:

Total votes including results of the
MySidewalk online poll are as
follows:
#1- 0 votes
#2 – 12 votes
#3 – 4 votes
#4 – 2 votes
The majority of committee members
preferred a slightly modified
CAMUTCD sign which allows for
customization of a regional identity,
local place name, route name, while
still maintaining the standard
CAMUTCD green background, shape
and dimensions.

Sign Types:

Alta is scoped to design three sign
types, a map kiosk, direction sign
and add-on signage.

TAMC Input:
o Develop options that fall
into one or two styles?
242
6 Monterey County Bicycle Map Comments
Global
o Overall Map- Too busy, Break into Regions- Accuracy?
o Global-Use consistent North Arrow
o Eye is drawn to San Benito County because of darker color, the viewer should see the bike routes/paths 1st
o Consider making land color white or more neutral color o Create multiple Maps at different Scale
o Countywide
o Monterey Peninsula
o North County
o Etc.
o Map too large, use smaller paper size
o Bigger Blowups
o Agreed too much blank space, consider scale and blow up o Too much green color. Topographic/slope color are distraction/confusing o Make path/late/route lines more prominent inside
o Choose fewer colors/paths
o Remove proposed lanes/paths
North End
o Inset 1-Too busy, simplify
o Caltrans Route 101 North of Russell – Bike route?
o In Legend (Caltrans Route) – Make clear that this is non-bike route or remove o Old Stage at Zabala-Simplify as one line due to map scale South End
o Too much blank space (in Los Padres NF near Tassajara Hot Springs) o Larger scale-blow up on more populated areas
o Connect Elm to Metz

3. mySidewalk training No Enclosure
Ms. Murillo provided a training on the new mySidewalk public forum tool. Ms. Murillo noted that the new mySidewalk tool is much easier to use, and that participants can sign up using their email, through their Facebook, LinkedIn or Google+ account. Committee Member Justin Meek suggested reaching out to students using this tool.
243
P:\Work Program\Bike Ped\Wayfinding Plan\Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee\Meetings\Minutes\Minutes_Meeting 6.docx Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee
Thursday, June 18th, 2015
9:30 a.m. – 10:30 a.m.

Call in: (760)569-0800 Participant Code:580128#
Transportation Agency for Monterey County —Conference Room 55-B Plaza Circle, Salinas

MINUTES

1. Welcome & Introductions
Committee Members Present
Eliza Yu Association for Monterey Bay Area Governments
Jeanette Pantoja (by phone) Building Healthy Communities Bernard Green California State University, Monterey Bay Justin Meek (by phone) City of Marina
Andrea Renny City of Monterey
Brent Slama City of Soledad
Ryan Chapman County of Monterey Public Works
Josh Metz Fort Ord Reuse Authority
Krista Hanni (by phone) Monterey County Health Department Lisa Rheinheimmer (by phone) Monterey-Salinas Transit
Staff Present
Todd Muck, Deputy Executive Director Ariana Green, Associate Transportation Planner Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner
244
P:\Work Program\Bike Ped\Wayfinding Plan\Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee\Meetings\Minutes\Minutes_Meeting 6.docx

2. Review Draft June 4, 2015 Minutes Pages 2-7
There were no comments on the June 4th meeting minutes.

3. Discuss Visioning Meeting and Next Steps No Enclosure Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, provided an overview of the June 4th visioning meeting, and highlighted the poster board votes included in the June 4th meeting minutes.

Ms. Murillo also mentioned that these materials were placed in the www.tamc.mysidewalk.com page for vote. Ms. Murillo reported that the next step will be for Alta Planning + Design to develop draft wayfinding signs.

Ms. Murillo reported that option #2 in the flexibility of sign Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) design spectrum was the most popular during the visioning meeting and in the mySidewalk poll. Committee Member Ryan Chapman expressed concern about design option #2, and mentioned that MUTCD compliance is a requirement for federal funding. Committee Member Chapman also expressed concern about long term maintenance for this design option. Committee Member Andrea Renny agreed that the design option should be more on the rigid MUTCD compliance spectrum.

Committee Member Victoria Beach asked about the materials, and expressed her preference for corten steel. Committee Member Beach mentioned that architects tend to prefer this material because it is very durable and has a more natural aesthetic. Committee Member Jeanette Pantoja asked about the costs associated with the materials and sign design. Ms. Murillo mentioned that in Alta Planning + Design’s presentation at the visioning meeting, the materials and sign design included an associated range of costs.

Committee Member Beach asked about the branding portion of the Wayfinding Plan. Committee Member Beach asked about Alta’s capacity to develop a brand for the regional routes, and used the Napa Vine Trail as an example of a branded regional bike network. Ariana Green, Associate Transportation Planner, mentioned that one Alta Planning + Design’s ideas was that the word “explore” can be incorporated into the signage as a way to maintain uniformity while allowing jurisdictions the opportunity to maintain their local identities. For example, a sign can say “Explore: Seaside” when a portion of the route is in Seaside, and “Explore: Marina” when a portion of the route is in Marina. Ms. Murillo mentioned that Alta is not scoped to develop a brand, but that the branding portion of the Wayfinding Plan is something that the Committee can do. Committee Member Beach asked staff to do more research on how other regions have successfully branded their regional bike networks.
245
P:\Work Program\Bike Ped\Wayfinding Plan\Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee\Meetings\Minutes\Minutes_Meeting 6.docx

4. Update on Regional Routes Page 8-10
a) Review Regional Route List
b) Discuss Route Limitations
c) Discuss Route Prioritization
Ms. Murillo reported that the Agency’s legal counsel suggested that only routes that have existing or proposed bicycle facilities be signed, with a priority for existing facilities. Ms. Murillo mentioned that routes identified by the Committee that are not in listed as existing or proposed will be compiled and analyzed in the next Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan update.

Ms. Murillo walked the Committee through the consolidated regional routes. Ms. Green mentioned that Alta Planning + Design introduced the idea of creating loops for a variety of users, and mentioned that staff will try and take a look at potential loops already present in the regional routes. Committee Member Beach and Todd Muck, Deputy Executive Director, asked whether Molera Road is the most direct route to Castroville, since Dolan Road appears to be a more direct connection. Ms. Green noted Molera Road is a popular route choice for cyclists. Committee members offered the following input:
 The Hartnell College Route via Alisal Street can close the loop for the Salinas Periphery Route. This loop can be known as the Ag Loop.
 San Juan Grade Road can be a connection to San Benito County.  Consider Divarty as a connection through the California State University, Monterey Bay area.
 Consider the AIDS route.

Committee Member Bernard Green showed the Committee the www.nationalbikechallenge.org page, which maps the routes that cyclists using the Strava app currently take. 246
P:\Work Program\Bike Ped\Wayfinding Plan\Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee\Meetings\Meeting 8\Minutes_Meeting

7.docx
Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee
Thursday, August 13th, 2015
2:00p.m. – 3:00p.m.

Call in: (760)569-0800 (641)569-0800 Participant Code:580128# Transportation Agency for Monterey County —Conference Room 55-B Plaza Circle, Salinas

MINUTES

1. Welcome & Introductions
Committee Members Present
Bernard Green California State University, Monterey Bay Victoria Beach (by phone) City of Carmel-by-the-Sea
Andrea Renny City of Monterey
Ted Lopez Fort Ord Reuse Authority
Lisa Rheinheimer Monterey-Salinas Transit
Eric Petersen Pedal Alpini/Fort Ord Recreation Trails Friends Staff Present
Todd Muck, Deputy Executive Director Ariana Green, Associate Transportation Planner Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner

2. Review Draft June 18, 2015 Minutes
There were no comments on the June 18th meeting minutes. 247
P:\Work Program\Bike Ped\Wayfinding Plan\Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee\Meetings\Meeting 8\Minutes_Meeting

7.docx

3. Discuss Draft Wayfinding Sign Designs & Bike Map
Layouts
Presentation
Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, presented the three draft wayfinding sign design concepts and the draft bike map layouts to the Committee for input. Ms. Murillo noted that the elements from the three different sign design concepts can be combined into a preferred design.

Committee Member Eric Petersen asked about the size of the directional signs. Ms. Murillo noted that the size of the signs will comply with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).

Committee Member Petersen also asked about the possibility of placing distance information in kilometers and miles. Ted Lopez, Fort Ord Reuse Authority alternate asked about translation for the wayfinding sign designs. Committee members offered the following input:
 Preference for Option #1 (pictured below) – Modern, Contemporary directional sign.

Committee Members Bernard Green and Andrea Renny and Todd Muck, Deputy Executive Director, liked the “Explore by bicycling and walking” logo. Committee Member Renny mentioned that the logo can easily be created with vinyl stickers. Committee members liked the “Explore Salinas” text order, over the “Salinas Explore” text order. In general, Committee members liked the destination, mileage and minutes distance information for the directional signs. Ms. Murillo mentioned that the www.TAMC.mySidewalk.com voting results also show a preference for Option #1.
248
P:\Work Program\Bike Ped\Wayfinding Plan\Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee\Meetings\Meeting 8\Minutes_Meeting

7.docx
 Preference for the Option #2 (pictured below) – Grounded, Contemporary compass rose add-on sign. Committee Member Victoria Beach noted that this is a cost-effective option for add-on signs. Mr. Muck asked about the possibility of having the compass rose be a bicycle wheel.
 Preference for the layout of Option #3 in the Option #2 structure of the gateway kiosk (pictured below).

Option #3 Option #2
249
P:\Work Program\Bike Ped\Wayfinding Plan\Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee\Meetings\Meeting 8\Minutes_Meeting

7.docx
Committee Member Renny noted that the continual structure of gateway kiosk option #2 was important for Americans with Disabilities (ADA) compliance, since someone that is visually impaired can detect the continual structure. Committee Member Beach also expressed her preference for the more natural aesthetic of gateway kiosk option #2, and noted that the other options would not have a high durability. Both she and Committee Member Renny liked the materials of the gateway kiosk option #2, noting that these materials have a high durability. Committee Member Renny also mentioned that baked enamel maps are a durable option for the gateway treatments.

Ms. Murillo also presented the planning level cost estimates for the sign designs, and noted that these estimates include the cost of installation and fabrication. Ms. Murillo mentioned that the cost of fabrication for the directional signs ranges from $100 (directional sign option #3) to $250-$300 (directional sign option #1). Ms. Murillo mentioned that the planning level cost estimates pictured below are based on current bids. Committee Member Renny noted that it would be more costeffective to go out to bid for the production of customized signs.

Committee Member Renny suggested that TAMC set up a contract with a sign shop that can produce the customized signs, as local sign shops have limited capacity for fabrication of directional sign option #1. That way the jurisdictions can have better access to the signage when replacements are needed. Ms. Murillo mentioned that Emily Duchon, from Alta Planning + Design, suggested that TAMC order extra blank signs to keep as replacements.

Committee Members expressed a preference for Vertical Bicycle Map Layout #3. Committee Member Eric Petersen mentioned that this layout would work well with handle bar map holders.

Committee Members Green and Beach also liked the vertical map layout, noting that it would be useful for cyclists looking at individual city panels. Committee Member Lisa Rheinheimer noted that the bike map colors should match the sign design color palette. 250
P:\Work Program\Bike Ped\Wayfinding Plan\Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee\Meetings\Meeting 10\Minutes_Meeting

9.docx
Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee
Thursday, November 19th, 2015
1:30 p.m. – 3:00 p.m.
*Join online: https://zoom.us/j/617724260
Call in: 1(415)762-9988 Meeting ID: 617-724-260
Transportation Agency for Monterey County —Conference Room 55-B Plaza Circle, Salinas

DRAFT MINUTES

1. Welcome & Introductions
Committee Members Present:

Bernard Green California State University, Monterey Bay Victoria Beach (by phone) City of Carmel-by-the-Sea
Justin Meek City of Marina
Lisa Rheinheimer Monterey-Salinas Transit
Eric Petersen Pedal Alpini/Fort Ord Recreation Trails Friends Jeanette Pantoja Building Healthy Communities
James Serrano City of Salinas
Kevin Cole (by phone) Pebble Beach Company
Doug Thurston Big Sur Marathon
Krista Hanni (by phone) Monterey County Health Department Staff Present
Todd Muck, Deputy Executive Director Ariana Green, Associate Transportation Planner Maria Montiel, Administrative Assistant Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner Debbie Hale, Executive Director (by phone)
251
P:\Work Program\Bike Ped\Wayfinding Plan\Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee\Meetings\Meeting 10\Minutes_Meeting

9.docx

2. Review Draft September 14th, 2015 Minutes
There were no comments on the September 14th meeting minutes.

3. Discuss Final Wayfinding Sign Design Concept
Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, noted that enhancing the environment for bicycling and walking with signage can increase the number of bicyclists and pedestrians using the county’s roadway network, and can improve the visibility and safety for these alternative forms of transportation. Having uniform signs can support residents and visitors who want to bicycle and in the cities and in the county, and can enhance each jurisdiction’s brand as a regional destination. Ms. Murillo walked the committee through the concepts below showcase three options for the “Explore Monterey County”.

The Committee had the following suggestions and comments to the Final Wayfinding Sign Design Concept:
 Consider having two sign options for cities to choose from  Consider including the agriculture fields on design
 Consider including destination information
 Consider removing the word “Explore” to make the bike/pedestrian bigger  Consider looking at a proof before printing production  Consider having each city decide to have miles and minutes Committee member James Serrano noted that the toppers will provide the theme. He noted that less information will make it easier for those biking to read. The Committee agreed on Option #2 as the final design option, noting the need to maintain all three design options to provide jurisdictions with flexibility. Ms. Murillo noted that Alta Planning + Design would finalize this option to include agricultural fields in the design.

Committee member Lisa Rheinheimer noted that having the information of how far things and places are would be helpful for those who are on a timely schedule and for those who don’t walk or bike far. She also, noted that using kilometers would possibly benefit better for the tourist.
252
P:\Work Program\Bike Ped\Wayfinding Plan\Wayfinding Plan Advisory Committee\Meetings\Meeting 10\Minutes_Meeting

9.docx
Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, noted that the two kiosk options showcase the looks of corten steel and painted aluminum. She went over the pros and cons of the two kios material options.

The Committee had the following suggestions and comments to the two kiosk options:
 Consider in the urban area the corten steel
 Consider in the modern area the painted aluminum

4. Review Draft Wayfinding Plan & Discuss Implementation Strategies Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, noted that there will be a three step phasing.

The Committee had the following suggestions on the draft Wayfinding Plan:
 Consider directional signage at Canyon Del Rey, Seaside  Consider signage at Fort Ord Monument
 Consider ATP grant
 Consider having signage at Chular
 Consider signage at River Road (wine corridor)
 Consider signage to monuments and trailheads

5. Bike Map Status Update
Virginia Murillo, Assistant Transportation Planner, updated the Committee on the status of the bike map. Ms. Murillo shared the draft bike map with the Committee. 253
 
 






 





!

"#
$%&! '

()**+,-*.
/.0*012)3+4*/+)
 
 5676 89

:
;<

<<

; 
<
;:
;
;
 
(=6>69

 ?@ABCDEFGEHIBDJBDAK?CA?ELMBADM K?CN@OPKFEDMIC?OCDMP?QOPBCDCI K?CN@OPDRSTUUVSVWS?GK BDLCDP@?@HOCQDPHXOEFBIC?DBE YZ[[\]^_[` abbc[d]a\]e^Y affced[_bg\Z[\ca^Yfec\a\]e^ _[bcahiZah[ [`[jk\]d[_]c[j\ec al[^jgmecne^\[c[gjek^\go\anjp
254
   





 





!

"#
$%&! '

()**+,-*.
/.0*012)3+4*/+)
 
 5676 
89 
:
;<

<<

; 
<
;:
;
;



=9(69




76769



 >?@ABCDDEBC>AEFGBCHIJKJ LBMNKOA>PHAQIOCDRSJ>ETJOAQIU >?@ABCDDEBC>AEFGBCHIJCJ LBMNKCFQFEHAQIOCDRV ENHAQIOCDROAQIN>PCFSJU >?@ABCDDEBC>AEFGBCHIJNJ LNMNCDDEBC>AEFHWFEBMNKENHAQIOCDRU >?@ABCDDEBC>AEFGBCHIJXJ LXMD>AGMHI@C>PHCFQBDCHHAKAB?BDIYCBADA>AIHU >?@ABCDDEBC>AEFGBCHIJBJLEYYHI>HAZFU LBMNKOA>PHAQIOCDR[J>ETJOAQIU >?@ABCDDEBC>AEFGBCHIJQJLEYYHI>HAZFU LBMNKOA>PHAQIOCDRSJ>ETJOAQIU 255
   





 





!

"#
$%&! '

()**+,-*.
/.0*012)3+4*/+)
 
 5676 
86 
9
:;

;;

: 
;
:9
:
:



(<6=6>

 ?@AB@CDEFGHDHFID?CHJIK@CGLJJKDC?
MKFAFIH@NMKOHFID?CHJIK@CGLJJKDC?
256
 
 






 





!

"#
$%&! '

()**+,-*.
/.0*012)3+4*/+)
 
 5676 
89 
:
;<

<<

; 
<
;:
;
;



9=(6=




7676=




257





 
  
   




 
  
  !
"#$! $%&'




 
  

( 
) 
 
**+*
( 
) 


 
**+*,

"" -
"

. 
. /
. /

0
1  
     

2'
. .3456789:9;
.<=>?@4A3?
B C
DE FGHHI JK

FLMNHO PQMRSO
TJUSVWO
FXUYZIIMN[QH\ZFZJS
]^_^`abc^bdde^bc
fgbhije_dk^bc
lGmnnopLVqnr
YVsrtntuvLmwoxVnsom
SJSH SPY[HT yz{z LP|y
IQMSF}JQIMIZJSM~HSLKJQYJSIHQHLJXSI
QH~ZJSMNRMKZSPZS~}QJ~QMYFZ~SF
LJSFIQXLIZJSPHIMZNF
l[€[zz‚
SPY[HT
258


      



 !"#$% ! $% !"&$' ! $'
()!*&++( *&++
")!"$,- ")!/$,% ")!"$,. ")!/$,' ")!/$,0 ")!/$,/$,++ ")!/$,, ")!/$,# ")!/$,$ ")!/$,/$,&& ")!/$#- ")!/$#% ")!/$#. ")!1$#1$#'' ")!1$#, ")!1$## ")!*$$- ")! ")!*$$. ")!*$$% ")!*$$, ")!*$$# ")!/$,+ ")!/$,, ")!/$,# ")!/$,$   ")!/$#% ")!/$#. ")!1$#' 23445 67
289:4; <=9>?;
@6A?BC;
2DAEF559:G=4HF2F6?
IJKJLMNOJNPPQJNO
RSNTUVQKPWJNO
X3YZZ[\8B]Z^
EB_^`Z`ab8Yc[dBZ_[Y
efghbiiij ?<EG4@ klml :ekCh
5=9?2n6=595F6?9o4?8p76=E6?54=4p86D?5p
=4oF6?9:>9p7F?<F?on=6o=9E2Fo?2
2Fo?:6895F6?n:9?
hGeXGle
?<E
<=975
mGlmGle
?<EG4@
<=975 qrsr
qrst

qusu
259
260
261
262
263
1 MEMORANDUM: October 5, 2022
AGENDA DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Guillermo Mixer, Acting Chief of Police
TITLE: A RESOLUTION TO RECLASSIFY THE POSITIONS OF

ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER AND CODE ENFORCEMENT

OFFICER TO COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER (CSO) AND

AMENDING THE SALARY SCHEDULE

BACKGROUND
The City has employment positions for Animal Control Officers (ACO), Code Enforcement Officers (CEO), and Community Service Officers (CSO). Currently, there are 2 positions for the ACO and the CEO, and .5 for the CSO. Designing these programs to maximize efficiency and productivity has been challenging, and having separate designations, pay scales, and duties for the respective classifications created additional difficulties to cover other duties as assigned. As a result, it was difficult to maintain adequate coverage for the City, and often would create staffing shortage to handle the respective duties, thereby creating lack in service for the residents of our community.

REVIEW AND ANALYSIS
With expanding residential and commercial growth, ACO and CEO duties are necessary and valuable resources to regulate and enforce quality of life issues that are important to all Greenfield residents. The City and its residents would benefit with merging these separate positions into a single classification, the Community Service Officer (CSO), where everyone is crossed trained in the areas relevant to the various duties. This reclassification would amplify coverage for all code enforcement and animal control issues Sunday through Saturday from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m.

In addition, CSOs would take on additional responsibilities such as basic counter reports, assisting with traffic control, crime scene management, corrective ticket signoffs, and crime reports. An added benefit of these additional duties will result in lessening the workload on police officers, and in turn allow for more proactive traffic and patrol field duties.

City Council Memorandum 599 El Camino Real Greenfield CA 93937 831-674-5591 www.ci.greenfield.ca.us
264
2 After careful analysis of similar positions within the Salinas Valley, staff recommends adoption of the following salary range:

Hourly Rate:

Step 1
$25.49
Step 2
$26.51
Step 3
$27.57
Step 4
$28.67
Step 5
$29.82
Step 6
$31.01
Step 7
$32.25
Step 8
$33.54
• It represents the current pay scale for Greenfield CEO employees. • It is 24.4% less than the salary for a Salinas CEO employee, which is the highest of the three positions (CEO, ACO, and CSO).
• The salary range is 3.65% less than the average between a Salinas CEO, ACO, and a CSO, at the hourly Step 1 rate - $26.42.

PROPOSED MOTION
I MOVE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION #2022-98, A RESOLUTION TO RECLASSIFY THE

POSITIONS OF ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER AND CODE ENFORCEMENT

OFFICER TO COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER (CSO) AND AMENDING THE

SALARY SCHEDULE
265
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-98

A RESOLUTION TO RECLASSIFY THE POSITIONS OF ANIMAL CONTROL

OFFICER AND CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER TO COMMUNITY SERVICE

OFFICER (CSO) AND AMENDING THE SALARY SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, Municipal Code Section 2.24 provides that adjustments of the salary and classification plan be by resolution; and
WHEREAS, Personnel Rules, Rule 3 – Classification Plan, Section. Administration of the Classification Plan states that the Personnel Officer shall administer the classification plan with all amendments or revisions to the plan subject to approval of the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Greenfield amends the salary schedule to reflect the following:

Hourly Rate:

Step 1
$25.49
Step 2
$26.51
Step 3
$27.57
Step 4
$28.67
Step 5
$29.82
Step 6
$31.01
Step 7
$32.25
Step 8
$33.54
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield at a regular meeting duly held on the 11th day of October 2022, by the following vote:

AYES, and in favor thereof, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

Lance Walker, Mayor
Attest:

Ann F. Rathbun, City Clerk
266

← All documents from this meeting