Cities Index.
Agenda

Greenfield City Council
November 12, 2024

Document
Agenda
Meeting
November 12, 2024
Body
Greenfield City Council
Pages
160
Original file
8.6 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on www.greenfieldca.gov. That file is the official record.

City of Greenfield
599 El Camino Real
Greenfield, CA 93927
City Council Meeting Agenda
November 12, 2024
6:00 P.M.

Mayor Robert White
Mayor Pro-tem Ariana Rodriguez
Councilmembers
Yanely Martinez
Rachel Ortiz
The Greenfield City Council meeting on November 12, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. will be held in the City Council Chambers located at 599 El Camino Real, Greenfield, California 93927, and will be open to the public. This meeting will also be accessible online and may be viewed through the following options:

Facebook Live: https://www.facebook.com/GreenfieldCA/
Join Zoom Meeting: http://meeting.ci.greenfield.ca.us
Meeting ID: 844 8164 8935
PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES.

A. CALL TO ORDER
B. ROLL CALL – CITY COUNCIL
C. EXCUSE COUNCILMEMBER ABSENCES
City Council Agenda
November 12, 2024

Page 2 ends

This agenda item allows the City Council to excuse the absence of Councilmembers not present at the meeting. If all Councilmembers are present, this agenda will be skipped. a. Public Comments
b. City Council Comments / Action
D. INVOCATION BY PASTOR ROBERT MULLEN
E. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
F. AGENDA REVIEW
G. PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
This portion of the Agenda allows an individual the opportunity to address the Council on any items not on the Closed Session, Consent Calendar, Public Hearings, and City Council Business. Under state regulations, no action can be taken on non-agenda items, including issues raised under this agenda item. Members of the public should be aware of this when addressing the Council regarding items not specifically referenced on this Agenda.

PLEASE NOTE: Public comments may be made in the following formats: in person, through Zoom, or by email. If you wish to make a public comment through Zoom, please use the “raise your hand” feature during the public comment section. You will be selected by the meeting host and will be allowed to say your comment aloud. If you wish to make a public comment through email, please submit your public comment to [email protected]. In the email subject line, please write your name and the agenda item or topic you are commenting on. If you wish to submit a public comment on more than one agenda item or topic, please send a separate email for each agenda item or topic you are commenting. All public comments submitted through email must be received no later than 12:00 p.m. (noon) on November 11, 2024. Comments submitted through email on time will be incorporated into the City Council Agenda and made part of the record for the meeting. Comments submitted by email that are not received on time will not be accepted. Public comments submitted by email will not be read aloud during the meeting. Please be aware that written public comments, including your name, may become public information.

H. COMMENTS FROM CITY COUNCIL
I. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one action of the City Council, unless a request for removal for discussion or explanation is received prior to the time Council votes on the motion to adopt. a. Public Comments
I-1. APPROVE Warrants #322750 through #323083 and Bank Drafts #6281 through #6304 in the amount of $963,914.90 – Page 1
I-2. APPROVE Minutes of the October 22, 2024 City Council Meeting – Page 19 I-3. DENY Claims Against the City – Kristy Casanova; Margarita Garcia and Muzafar Hussain – Page 24
City Council Agenda
November 12, 2024

Page 3 ends

I-4. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS – Community Services Officers / Recreation Department / Science Workshop / Fire Department – Page 34 J. MAYOR’S PRESENTATION, PROCLAMATIONS, COMMUNICATIONS, RESOLUTIONS J-1. PROCLAMATION – National Alzheimer’s Disease Awareness Month – Page 52 J-2. PRESENTATION – Salinas Valley Safe Routes to School Plan – Page 53 J-3. PRESENTATION – Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Quarter 1 (July-September 2024) Financial Review – Page 137
J-4. UPDATE – Community Center and Park Project Timeline – Page 144 K. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
K-1. ADOPT A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Accepting Year 1 and Year 2 of the Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) Project Completed by Pro-Pipe, Inc. – Page 147
a. Staff Report
b. Public Comments
c. Council Comments / Review / Action
Staff Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution #2024-132
K-2. ADOPT A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Declaring that Zero (0) Bids were Received and that the Fire Department Apparatus Bay Door Project may be Procured Economically and Satisfactorily in the Open Market (Greenfield Municipal Code Section 3.12.050(6)) – Page 151 a. Staff Report
b. Public Comments
c. Council Comments / Review / Action
Staff Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution #2024-133
K-3. ADOPT A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Awarding a Public Works Construction Contract in the Amount of $738,000.00 to VSS International Inc., to Construct the Greenfield 2024 Pavement Maintenance Project, Base Bid, and Authorizing the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute this Contract and Assign Additional Work in Accordance with this Resolution, Authorize the City Engineer, MNS Engineers, Inc. to Perform Construction Management and Inspection Services in the Amount not to Exceed $51,600.00 – Page 154 a. Staff Report
b. Public Comments
c. Council Comments / Review / Action
Staff Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution #2024-134
K-4. ADOPT A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield to Ratify the Emergency Suspension of Normal Bidding or Purchasing Requirements Related to Construction of Temporary, Emergency Wastewater Disposal Sprayfields –

Page 160 ends

a. Staff Report
b. Public Comments
c. Council Comments / Review / Action
Staff Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution #2024-135
City Council Agenda
November 12, 2024

Page 4 ends

K-5. ADOPT A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Approving an Agreement with Fluid Resource Management (FRM) to be the Contract Interim Chief Plant Operator (CPO) of the Wastewater Plant, Interim Operator of Record for the Public Water System, and Consulting Services for the City of Greenfield for a Period of One (1) Year – Page 165
a. Staff Report
b. Public Comments
c. Council Comments / Review / Action
Staff Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution #2024-136
K-6. ADOPT A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Accepting and Appropriating Funds in Fiscal Year 2024-2025 in the Amount of $94,663.46 to Fund Expenditures to be Paid for with Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Growth Special Account Fund – Page 168
a. Staff Report
b. Public Comments
c. Council Comments / Review / Action
Staff Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution #2024-137
K-7. ADOPT A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Approving the Draft Purchase and Sale Agreement and Supplementally Appropriating $138,890 for the Purchase of the Property to be Used for a New Water Well (APN/PACEL ID# 109-271-001, -004, -005, -006, -012 & -013) – Page 171
a. Staff Report
b. Public Comments
c. Council Comments / Review / Action
Staff Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution #2024-138
K-8. DISCUSSION Related to Proposal to Perform ADA Infrastructure Improvements in Parks and Recreation Facilities – Page 199
a. Staff Report
b. Public Comments
c. Council Comments / Review / Action
Staff Recommended Action – Provide Direction
L. BRIEF REPORTS ON CONFERENCES, SEMINARS, AND MEETINGS ATTENDED BY

MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
a. League of California Cities Monterey Bay Division
b. Transportation Agency for Monterey County
c. Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments
d. Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority
e. Monterey Salinas Transit
f. South Salinas Valley Broadband Authority
g. Monterey County Mayors’ Association
h. Salinas Valley Mayors/Managers Group
i. Planning Commission
City Council Agenda
November 12, 2024

Page 5 ends

M. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
N. CITY MANAGER REPORT
O. ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (831) 674-5591. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the meeting (CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II). ********************************************************************************* This agenda is duly posted outside City Hall and on the City of Greenfield web site. 11/7/2024 3:10:21 PM Page 1 of 4
Check Report
Greenfield, CA By Check Number
Date Range: 10/17/2024 - 11/07/2024
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Bank Code: APBNK-APBNK
04379 ARMANDO JR. LERMA 10/18/2024 Regular 0.00 -69.00 322750 04715 4LEAF, INC 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 3,177.50 322936 00156 AMERICAN SUPPLY COMPANY 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 73.91 322937 01814 ANN RATHBUN 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 250.94 322938 05567 APEX INTEGRATED DISTRIBUTION 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 100.14 322939 05123 BEN C RIANDA 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 325.00 322940 05508 BPR CONSULTING GROUP LLC 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 26,845.61 322941 00396 CASEY PRINTING 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 1,800.28 322942 05136 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 10.00 322943 04407 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 894.42 322944 00348 CSG CONSULTANTS, INC. 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 725.00 322945 05199 DENISE DUFFY & ASSOCIATES, INC. 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 17,555.85 322946 05103 DRIVE CUSTOMS 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 250.00 322947 05344 EVELIN MEZA 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 1,256.68 322948 04132 GARDAWORLD 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 1,649.65 322949 00720 GRAINGER 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 22.19 322950
00725 GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 689.90 322951 05005 GREENFIELD 101, INC. 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 156.00 322952 00767 GREENFIELD TOWING 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 420.00 322953 00721 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 44.12 322954 00805 HACH COMPANY 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 55.09 322955 00803 HYDRO TURF, INC. 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 794.47 322956 03107 L.N. CURTIS & SONS 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 144.61 322957 01300 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 52.74 322958 04002 MONTEREY COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 996.00 322959 01340 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 1,193.74 322960 04670 NAPA AUTO PARTS 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 102.41 322961 04653 NEW SV MEDIA, INC 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 327.31 322962 01506 OFFICE DEPOT 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 189.03 322963 01532 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 185.06 322964 04655 OR-TEC, INC. 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 10,750.00 322965 05182 PACIFIC AG RENTALS, LLC 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 6,657.60 322966 04299 PURE WATER 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 255.25 322967
01919 SALINAS VALLEY FORD 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 1,804.08 322968 01999 SALINAS VALLEY SOLID WASTE AUTHORITY 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 71,158.56 322969 04338 SHRED-IT USA 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 144.01 322970 01945 SOUTH COUNTY TIRE, LLC 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 264.54 322971 04835 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRICANTS, LLC 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 9,197.94 322972 04315 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 68.09 322973 00386 STATE OF CA DEPT. OF JUSTICE 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 204.00 322974 05568 SUNRUN INSTALLATION SERVICES, INC. 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 533.34 322975 00634 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 4,118.75 322976 03904 ULINE 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 158.61 322977
02241 VAL'S PLUMBING AND HEATING 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 530.44 322978 05566 VERONICA ALBINO 10/21/2024 Regular 0.00 200.00 322979 00749 CITY OF GREENFIELD 10/24/2024 Regular 0.00 86.68 323002 00713 G P O A 10/24/2024 Regular 0.00 1,280.00 323003
00795 GREENFIELD POLICE SERGEANTS ASSOCIATION 10/24/2024 Regular 0.00 600.00 323004 04521 Greenfield Professional Firefighters 10/24/2024 Regular 0.00 315.00 323005 05322 OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NO. 3 10/24/2024 Regular 0.00 191.10 323006 01911 SEIU Local 521 10/24/2024 Regular 0.00 812.41 323007 00174 A&G PUMPING 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 475.75 323008 05313 AGILE OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE, PC 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 150.00 323009 00180 ALL SAFE INTEGRATED SYSTEMS 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 390.00 323010 1 Check Report Date Range: 10/17/2024 - 11/07/2024
11/7/2024 3:10:21 PM Page 2 of 4
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number 04878 ANA M. CORDERO 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 135.00 323011 00101 AT&T 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 66.99 323012
05350 BRONCO VAN & STORAGE 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 520.00 323013 01942 CITY OF SOLEDAD 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 2,380.00 323014 04681 CLARK PEST CONTROL 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 190.00 323015 04342 CORE & MAIN LP 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 2,180.21 323016 00413 DELL MARKETING, L.P. 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 1,511.71 323017 04753 G&C CONSULTING, INC. 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 6,000.00 323018 04132 GARDAWORLD 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 148.07 323019
00767 GREENFIELD TOWING 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 200.00 323020 00721 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 54.53 323021 05337 HM SUPPLIES, INC. 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 111.98 323022 00820 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 294.37 323023 01258 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 15,138.09 323024 01340 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 14,734.60 323025 04286 MY JEEP-CHRYSLER-DODGE-RAM/MY CHEVROLET/MY NISSAN-KIA 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 615.30 323027 04670 NAPA AUTO PARTS 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 1,182.77 323028 01506 OFFICE DEPOT 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 192.95 323029 01532 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 243.41 323030 01667 PRINTING SYSTEMS, INC. 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 114.49 323031 02367 ROBIN WARBEY CONSULTING 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 6,664.21 323032 01999 SALINAS VALLEY SOLID WASTE AUTHORITY 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 4,832.36 323033 03919 TPX COMMUNICATIONS 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 2,043.37 323034 04079 VERIZON 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 703.00 323035
02210 VERIZON WIRELESS 10/28/2024 Regular 0.00 1,307.26 323036 05559 AARON BENJAMIN CHAVEZ 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 5,890.50 323037 05560 ADALAY ANDRADE 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 5,334.00 323038 05313 AGILE OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE, PC 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 565.00 323039 05558 AUGUSTINE S. LEDESMA 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 2,871.38 323040 05571 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POLICY GROUP, INC. 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 4,750.00 323041 05570 CALIFORNIA STRATEGIES & ADVOCACY, LLC 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 15,000.00 323042 04407 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 426.44 323043 01942 CITY OF SOLEDAD 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 2,975.00 323044 00348 CSG CONSULTANTS, INC. 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 97.50 323045 05432 ELIZABETH LOPEZ 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 2,671.50 323046 00631 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. 795 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 556.00 323047 05556 FREDDY SUAREZ LOPEZ 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 3,690.38 323048 00720 GRAINGER 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 834.06 323049
00725 GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 415.18 323050 00721 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 110.86 323051 04881 GUILLERMO H MIXER 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 3,742.35 323052 00809 HDL COREN & CONE 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 1,980.00 323053 05555 IMANI JUBILEE HARRIGAN 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 4,294.50 323054 05557 IZAIAH MICHAEL CAMARENA HURTADO 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 2,617.88 323055 04960 JORGE GUTIERREZ 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 348.00 323056 04046 JOSEPH DYELS 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 348.00 323057 05572 JULIO SANTILLAN 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 163.86 323058 04253 JUSTIN MATTKE 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 395.00 323059 04663 LEGAL NOTIFICATION SERVICES, INC. 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 1,903.56 323060 13006 MONTEREY BAY AREA SELF INSURANCE AUTHORITY 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 48.50 323061 01380 MONTEREY COUNTY ANIMAL SERVICES CENTER 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 15,908.00 323062 05478 MONTEREY PENINSULA ENGINEERING 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 330,569.60 323063 04670 NAPA AUTO PARTS 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 259.27 323064 03896 NICK'S GARAGE 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 261.22 323065 05562 NJA ARCHITECTURE 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 6,087.50 323066 01532 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 21.96 323067 04661 QUALITY WATER ENTERPRISES INC 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 38.75 323068 01897 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 1,318.98 323069 05428 RIQUELINO OSORIO DE JESUS 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 219.38 323070 01919 SALINAS VALLEY FORD 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 201.35 323071 01933 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAPING 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 15,925.00 323072 2 Check Report Date Range: 10/17/2024 - 11/07/2024
11/7/2024 3:10:21 PM Page 3 of 4
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number 04835 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRICANTS, LLC 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 6,307.62 323073 04315 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 201.47 323074 04445 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS, LLC 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 29.67 323075 04837 THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 1,916.25 323076 04937 T-MOBILE 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 163.40 323077
03873 U.S. Bank Equipment Finance 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 4,347.77 323078 04776 VALENTIN VELASQUEZ 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 150.00 323079 02210 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 2,006.98 323080 02372 WALLACE GROUP 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 428.75 323081 05415 WM. J. CLARK TRUCKING SERVICES, INC. 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 1,298.69 323082 02601 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC. 11/01/2024 Regular 0.00 2,343.88 323083 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 10/25/2024 Bank Draft 0.00 317.23 DFT0006281 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 10/25/2024 Bank Draft 0.00 393.93 DFT0006282 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 10/25/2024 Bank Draft 0.00 832.29 DFT0006283 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 10/25/2024 Bank Draft 0.00 2,390.00 DFT0006284 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 10/25/2024 Bank Draft 0.00 2,215.00 DFT0006285 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 10/25/2024 Bank Draft 0.00 1,979.00 DFT0006286 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 10/25/2024 Bank Draft 0.00 400.00 DFT0006287 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 10/25/2024 Bank Draft 0.00 1,285.00 DFT0006288 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 10/25/2024 Bank Draft 0.00 275.00 DFT0006289 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 10/25/2024 Bank Draft 0.00 250.00 DFT0006290 00431 DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES 10/25/2024 Bank Draft 0.00 1,144.51 DFT0006291 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 10/25/2024 Bank Draft 0.00 4,056.50 DFT0006292 00384 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD 10/25/2024 Bank Draft 0.00 4,835.17 DFT0006293 03103 Internal Revenue Service 10/25/2024 Bank Draft 0.00 12,960.49 DFT0006294 03103 Internal Revenue Service 10/25/2024 Bank Draft 0.00 44,083.96 DFT0006295 00384 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD 10/25/2024 Bank Draft 0.00 21,337.35 DFT0006296 03103 Internal Revenue Service 10/25/2024 Bank Draft 0.00 50,091.85 DFT0006297 00215 ANTHEM - BLUE CROSS 10/25/2024 Bank Draft 0.00 118,539.93 DFT0006298 00384 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD 10/28/2024 Bank Draft 0.00 9,864.00 DFT0006299 00384 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD 11/05/2024 Bank Draft 0.00 150.75 DFT0006300 03103 Internal Revenue Service 11/05/2024 Bank Draft 0.00 397.34 DFT0006301 03103 Internal Revenue Service 11/05/2024 Bank Draft 0.00 1,699.06 DFT0006302 00384 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD 11/05/2024 Bank Draft 0.00 56.31 DFT0006303 03103 Internal Revenue Service 11/05/2024 Bank Draft 0.00 195.82 DFT0006304 Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Discount
Payment
Payment Type Count
Bank Code APBNK Summary
Bank Drafts
EFT's
125
0 1
24 0

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 150 0.00
Payment
684,233.41

0.00 -69.00
279,750.49

0.00 963,914.90
Payable
Count
183
0 0
24 0
207
3 Check Report Date Range: 10/17/2024 - 11/07/2024
11/7/2024 3:10:21 PM Page 4 of 4
All Bank Codes Check Summary
Payment Type Discount
Payment
Count Payment
Payable
Count
Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Bank Drafts
EFT's
125
0 1
24 0

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 150 0.00
684,233.41

0.00 -69.00
279,750.49

0.00 963,914.90
183
0 0
24 0
207
Fund Name Period Amount
Fund Summary
999 CASH CONTROL 10/2024 509,380.68
999 CASH CONTROL 11/2024 454,534.22
963,914.90
4 11/7/2024 3:11:30 PM Page 1 of 14
Expense Approval Report
Greenfield, CA By Fund
Payment Dates 10/17/2024 - 11/7/2024
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount Fund: 100 - GENERAL FUND
LOZANO SMITH, LLP 323024 10/28/2024 LEGAL SERVICES - GENERAL LIT…100-150-63100.000 140.00 GRAINGER 322950 10/21/2024 SAFETY SIGN 100-111-65700.000 22.19 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-331-040-… 100-110-68700.000 18.56 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-311-004-… 100-110-68700.000 17.48 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-012-021-… 100-111-68700.000 26.72 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-012-020-… 100-111-68700.000 27.04 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-012-019-… 100-111-68700.000 27.04 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 109-521-022-… 100-320-68700.000 23.68 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 109-131-009-… 100-320-68700.000 111.82 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-154-046-… 100-320-68700.000 20.34 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 109-181-013-… 100-320-68700.000 13.72 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-015-030-… 100-320-68700.000 151.60 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-034-006-… 100-550-68700.000 148.86 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-244-068-… 100-550-68700.000 16.78 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 109-114-007-… 100-550-68700.000 15.22 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 109-291-008-… 100-550-68700.000 1,441.36 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-211-026-… 100-550-68700.000 25.72 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 109-291-010-… 100-550-68700.000 43.94 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-015-031-… 100-550-68700.000 155.72 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 109-232-006-… 100-551-68700.000 141.40 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-033-005-… 100-551-68700.000 146.42 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-033-006-… 100-551-68700.000 146.42 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 109-291-009-… 100-551-68700.000 1,448.94 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-033-007-… 100-551-68700.000 146.42 4LEAF, INC 322936 10/21/2024 BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIE… 100-25105 3,177.50 ULINE 322977 10/21/2024 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 100-111-65600.000 158.61 OFFICE DEPOT 322963 10/21/2024 BREAKROOM SUPPLIES - POLI… 100-201-65100.000 112.93 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 322960 10/21/2024 PROPERTY TAX - 109-232-006-…100-551-68700.000 1,193.74 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 322973 10/21/2024 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 100-111-65700.000 68.09 GARDAWORLD 323019 10/28/2024 EXCESS LIABILITY 100-190-63300.000 148.07 SALINAS VALLEY SOLID WASTE…322969 10/21/2024 WASTE SERVICES FY 2024-2025 100-191-64400.000 71,158.56 SHRED-IT USA 322970 10/21/2024 SHREDDING SERVICES - POLICE…100-215-63400.000 144.01 GARDAWORLD 322949 10/21/2024 ARMED TRANSPORTATION SE… 100-190-63300.000 1,649.65 PURE WATER 322967 10/21/2024 CVC WATER 100-111-65100.000 183.25 PURE WATER 322967 10/21/2024 WATER - POLICE DEPT 100-201-65100.000 72.00 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 322964 10/21/2024 7706 - GLOVES/PAINT 100-320-66300.000 57.61 NAPA AUTO PARTS 322961 10/21/2024 GLOVES 100-320-65700.000 102.41 VERIZON WIRELESS 323036 10/28/2024 CELL PHONES - PW 100-101-64600.000 190.05 VERIZON WIRELESS 323036 10/28/2024 CELL PHONES - PW 100-110-64600.000 42.06 VERIZON WIRELESS 323036 10/28/2024 CELL PHONES - PW 100-320-64600.000 21.03 VERIZON WIRELESS 323036 10/28/2024 CELL PHONES - PW 100-550-64600.000 21.03 VERIZON WIRELESS 323036 10/28/2024 CELL PHONES - PW 100-551-64600.000 313.07 VERIZON WIRELESS 323036 10/28/2024 CELL PHONES - PW 100-601-64600.000 42.06 CSG CONSULTANTS, INC. 323045 11/01/2024 PLAN CHECK REVIEW SERVICES…100-25105 97.50 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 322954 10/21/2024 PAINT STAINER 100-320-65700.000 17.30 VERIZON 323035 10/28/2024 GPS SERVICES FY-24/25 100-110-64900.000 19.00 VERIZON 323035 10/28/2024 GPS SERVICES FY-24/25 100-215-64900.000 361.00 VERIZON 323035 10/28/2024 GPS SERVICES FY-24/25 100-310-64900.000 19.00 VERIZON 323035 10/28/2024 GPS SERVICES FY-24/25 100-320-64900.000 57.00 VERIZON 323035 10/28/2024 GPS SERVICES FY-24/25 100-550-64900.000 38.00 VERIZON 323035 10/28/2024 GPS SERVICES FY-24/25 100-551-64900.000 19.00 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 322944 10/21/2024 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 100-111-65600.000 40.03 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 322944 10/21/2024 UNIFORMS 100-320-65200.000 148.48 5 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 10/17/2024 - 11/7/2024 11/7/2024 3:11:30 PM Page 2 of 14
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount CINTAS CORPORATION #630 322944 10/21/2024 UNIFORMS 100-550-65200.000 148.48 STATE OF CA DEPT. OF JUSTICE 322974 10/21/2024 FINGERPRINT SERVICES - POLI… 100-215-63400.000 204.00 HYDRO TURF, INC. 322956 10/21/2024 PATRIOT PARK - TWELFTH SPR…100-550-65700.000 794.47 BPR CONSULTING GROUP LLC 322941 10/21/2024 BUILDING SERVICES/PLAN CH… 100-22565 260.00 BPR CONSULTING GROUP LLC 322941 10/21/2024 BUILDING SERVICES/PLAN CH… 100-25105 9,011.34 BPR CONSULTING GROUP LLC 322941 10/21/2024 BUILDING SERVICES/PLAN CH… 100-601-63600.000 17,574.27 OFFICE DEPOT 323029 10/28/2024 COPY PAPER - CITY HALL 100-111-61200.000 192.95 MONTEREY COUNTY ANIMAL … 323062 11/01/2024 PD ANIMAL COUNTY SHELTER …100-230-63400.000 15,908.00 GREENFIELD TOWING 322953 10/21/2024 VEHICLE TOWING SERVICE 100-215-63400.000 220.00 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRIC… 322972 10/21/2024 GASOLINE/DIESEL 100-111-66100.000 67.77 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRIC… 322972 10/21/2024 GASOLINE/DIESEL 100-215-66100.000 4,608.55 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRIC… 322972 10/21/2024 GASOLINE/DIESEL 100-320-66100.000 450.24 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRIC… 322972 10/21/2024 GASOLINE/DIESEL 100-550-66100.000 547.06 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRIC… 322972 10/21/2024 GASOLINE/DIESEL 100-551-66100.221 135.55 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRIC… 322972 10/21/2024 GASOLINE/DIESEL 100-601-66100.000 67.77 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 9 10/28/2024 P.P. BASEBALL FIELD 100-550-64100.000 95.97 GRAINGER 323049 11/01/2024 DAY CARE CENTER - LED RETR… 100-590-65900.000 834.06 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 322954 10/21/2024 PD BUILDING MAINTENANCE … 100-201-65900.000 9.46 AMERICAN SUPPLY COMPANY 322937 10/21/2024 TRASH BAGS - ANIMAL CONT… 100-230-65600.000 73.91 GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 323050 11/01/2024 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 100-320-65700.000 115.08 GREENFIELD 101, INC. 322952 10/21/2024 PD CAR WASHES - SEPT 2024 100-215-65100.000 156.00 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 9 10/28/2024 P.P. COMMUNITY CENTER 100-551-64100.000 863.71 BRONCO VAN & STORAGE 323013 10/28/2024 STORAGE FOR SOFTBALL EQUI…100-551-63500.000 520.00 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 323024 10/28/2024 LEGAL SERVICES - GENERAL L… 100-150-63100.000 1,661.31 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 323024 10/28/2024 LEGAL SERVICES - POLICE 100-150-63100.000 1,431.12 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 323024 10/28/2024 LEGAL SERVICES - GENERAL P… 100-150-63100.000 39.00 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 323024 10/28/2024 LEGAL SERVICES - PUBLIC REC… 100-150-63100.000 370.50 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 323024 10/28/2024 LEGAL SERVICES - BUILDING, P…100-150-63100.000 2,242.50 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 323024 10/28/2024 LEGAL SERVICES - 717 OAK AV… 100-150-63100.000 423.72 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 323024 10/28/2024 LEGAL SERVICES - 137 6TH ST… 100-150-63100.000 409.50 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 323024 10/28/2024 LEGAL SERVICES - COUNCIL M… 100-150-63100.000 3,251.67 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 323024 10/28/2024 LEGAL SERVICES - PUBLIC WO… 100-150-63100.000 1,337.50 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 323024 10/28/2024 LEGAL SERVICES - SANDOVAL … 100-150-63100.000 3,558.27 WM. J. CLARK TRUCKING SERV…323082 11/01/2024 LOOSE CONCRETE SAND FOR … 100-550-65700.000 811.85 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 322944 10/21/2024 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 100-111-65600.000 40.03 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 322944 10/21/2024 UNIFORMS 100-320-65200.000 65.17 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 322944 10/21/2024 UNIFORMS 100-550-65200.000 65.17 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 323051 11/01/2024 DROP CLOTH/MASK TAPE 100-111-65900.000 28.36 CLARK PEST CONTROL 323015 10/28/2024 PEST CONTROL SERVICES 100-111-65900.000 190.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 323080 11/01/2024 CELL PHONES - POLICE DEPT 100-215-64600.000 1,761.04 VERIZON WIRELESS 323080 11/01/2024 CELL PHONES - POLICE DEPT 100-230-64600.000 125.46 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 11 11/01/2024 COMMUNITY PARK 100-550-64100.000 100.39 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS, LLC 323075 11/01/2024 VOLUNTEER PD HAT - RAY 100-201-65200.000 29.67 ANN RATHBUN 322938 10/21/2024 PER-DIEM - CALPERS ANNUAL… 100-170-67100.000 250.94 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 11 11/01/2024 CIVIC CENTER 100-111-64100.000 36,920.19 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 11 11/01/2024 CIVIC CENTER 100-111-64200.000 303.09 SALINAS VALLEY SOLID WASTE…323033 10/28/2024 1ST QUARTER - JULY-SEPTEM… 100-191-64400.000 4,832.36 EVELIN MEZA 322948 10/21/2024 APA CONFERENCE HOTEL REI… 100-601-67100.000 1,256.68 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 323043 11/01/2024 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 100-111-65600.000 40.03 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 323043 11/01/2024 UNIFORMS 100-320-65200.000 96.44 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 323043 11/01/2024 UNIFORMS 100-550-65200.000 96.44 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 8 10/21/2024 CITY ENGINEERING SERVICES 100-310-63700.000 1,102.50 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 8 10/21/2024 GREENFIELD COMMONS I 100-24720 1,514.00 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 8 10/21/2024 GREENFIELD COMMONS I 100-25105 42.50 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRIC… 323073 11/01/2024 GASOLINE/FUEL 100-111-66100.000 63.08 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRIC… 323073 11/01/2024 GASOLINE/FUEL 100-215-66100.000 4,289.18 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRIC… 323073 11/01/2024 GASOLINE/FUEL 100-320-66100.000 126.15 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRIC… 323073 11/01/2024 GASOLINE/FUEL 100-550-66100.000 126.15 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRIC… 323073 11/01/2024 GASOLINE/FUEL 100-551-66100.221 126.15 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRIC… 323073 11/01/2024 GASOLINE/FUEL 100-601-66100.000 63.08 6 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 10/17/2024 - 11/7/2024 11/7/2024 3:11:30 PM Page 3 of 14
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount SUNRUN INSTALLATION SERVI…322975 10/21/2024 REIMBURSABLE PERMIT FEES -…100-26165 1.00 SUNRUN INSTALLATION SERVI…322975 10/21/2024 REIMBURSABLE PERMIT FEES -…100-42105.000 4.36 SUNRUN INSTALLATION SERVI…322975 10/21/2024 REIMBURSABLE PERMIT FEES -…100-44285.000 10.09 SUNRUN INSTALLATION SERVI…322975 10/21/2024 REIMBURSABLE PERMIT FEES -…100-26165 1.00 SUNRUN INSTALLATION SERVI…322975 10/21/2024 REIMBURSABLE PERMIT FEES -…100-42105.000 180.72 SUNRUN INSTALLATION SERVI…322975 10/21/2024 REIMBURSABLE PERMIT FEES -…100-44285.000 16.66 SUNRUN INSTALLATION SERVI…322975 10/21/2024 REIMBURSABLE PERMIT FEES -…100-26165 1.00 SUNRUN INSTALLATION SERVI…322975 10/21/2024 REIMBURSABLE PERMIT FEES -…100-42105.000 94.32 SUNRUN INSTALLATION SERVI…322975 10/21/2024 REIMBURSABLE PERMIT FEES -…100-44285.000 14.21 SUNRUN INSTALLATION SERVI…322975 10/21/2024 REIMBURSABLE PERMIT FEES -…100-26165 1.00 SUNRUN INSTALLATION SERVI…322975 10/21/2024 REIMBURSABLE PERMIT FEES -…100-42105.000 192.04 SUNRUN INSTALLATION SERVI…322975 10/21/2024 REIMBURSABLE PERMIT FEES -…100-44285.000 16.94 ALL SAFE INTEGRATED SYSTE… 323010 10/28/2024 QUARTERLY FIRE MONITORIN… 100-590-63900.000 150.00 ALL SAFE INTEGRATED SYSTE… 323010 10/28/2024 BURGLARY MONITORING - 12… 100-110-63900.000 126.00 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 10 11/01/2024 WALNUT TRAVEL CENTER AT … 100-24718 440.00 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 323051 11/01/2024 PAINT/SPRAY/ADHESIVE - TAS… 100-215-65400.000 41.45 PRINTING SYSTEMS, INC. 323031 10/28/2024 BUSINESS LICENSE ENVELOPES 100-190-61200.000 114.49 JULIO SANTILLAN 323058 11/01/2024 BOOTS REIMBURSEMENT FY 2…100-320-65200.000 81.93 JULIO SANTILLAN 323058 11/01/2024 BOOTS REIMBURSEMENT FY 2…100-550-65200.000 81.93 GUILLERMO H MIXER 323052 11/01/2024 IACP CONVENTION TRAINING-…100-201-67200.000 561.61 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC. …323047 11/01/2024 COMMUNITY CENTER URINAL… 100-551-65900.000 556.00 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 323074 11/01/2024 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 100-111-65600.000 59.37 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 323074 11/01/2024 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 100-550-65600.000 75.52 SEIU Local 521 323007 10/24/2024 COPE - Union Dues 100-22420 0.21 SEIU Local 521 323007 10/24/2024 Union Dues 100-22420 331.98 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006281 10/25/2024 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 100-22430 95.17 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006283 10/25/2024 Deferred Compensation Loan … 100-22435 832.29 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006284 10/25/2024 Defer Comp-GPOA 100-22430 500.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006285 10/25/2024 Defer Comp-GPSA 100-22430 1,365.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006286 10/25/2024 Defer Comp-Management 100-22430 810.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006287 10/25/2024 Defer Comp-Mid Management 100-22430 220.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006288 10/25/2024 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 100-22430 300.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006289 10/25/2024 Defer Comp-OE3 Employees 100-22430 275.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006290 10/25/2024 Defer Comp-Chief of Police 100-22430 250.00 G P O A 323003 10/24/2024 GPOA DUES 100-22410 320.00
OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL…323006 10/24/2024 Union Dues 100-22420 63.70 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006292 10/25/2024 Roth Retirement 100-22431 4,056.50 GREENFIELD POLICE SERGEAN… 323004 10/24/2024 GPSA DUES 100-22415 300.00 CITY OF GREENFIELD 323002 10/24/2024 Weapon Repay 100-22481 86.68 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006293 10/25/2024 SDI 100-22225 1,582.31 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006294 10/25/2024 Medicare 100-22215 4,288.63 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006295 10/25/2024 Social Security 100-22215 14,354.04 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006296 10/25/2024 State Withholding 100-22220 6,334.94 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006297 10/25/2024 Federal Tax Withholding 100-22210 16,149.26 HDL COREN & CONE 323053 11/01/2024 2ND QUARTER - OCTOBER-DE… 100-190-63300.000 1,980.00 Fund 100 - GENERAL FUND Total: 263,516.61
Fund: 102 - Fire General
MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-071-026-… 102-250-68700.000 204.38 L.N. CURTIS & SONS 322957 10/21/2024 WILDLAND GLOVES 102-250-65200.000 144.61 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 322958 10/21/2024 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES - FIRE D… 102-250-65600.000 52.74 VERIZON WIRELESS 323036 10/28/2024 CELL PHONES - PW 102-250-64600.000 168.24 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRIC… 322972 10/21/2024 GASOLINE/DIESEL 102-250-66100.000 861.75 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 11 11/01/2024 FIRE DEPT 102-250-64100.000 1,330.20 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 11 11/01/2024 FIRE DEPT 102-250-64200.000 89.92 CSG CONSULTANTS, INC. 322945 10/21/2024 FIRE MARSHAL SERVICES 102-250-63600.000 725.00 VAL'S PLUMBING AND HEATI… 322978 10/21/2024 FD HVAC SERVICE 102-250-65900.000 530.44 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRIC… 323073 11/01/2024 GASOLINE/FUEL 102-250-66100.000 126.15 BEN C RIANDA 322940 10/21/2024 REIMBURSEMENT - MCFTOA-… 102-250-67200.000 325.00 QUALITY WATER ENTERPRISES…323068 11/01/2024 WATER/SERVICE - FIRE DEPT 102-250-65900.000 38.75 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006282 10/25/2024 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 102-22430 163.20 7 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 10/17/2024 - 11/7/2024 11/7/2024 3:11:30 PM Page 4 of 14
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006288 10/25/2024 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 102-22430 300.00 Greenfield Professional Firefig…323005 10/24/2024 Fire Union Dues 102-22410 211.58 DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERV…DFT0006291 10/25/2024 Misc Withholding 102-22450 346.15 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006293 10/25/2024 SDI 102-22225 527.43 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006294 10/25/2024 Medicare 102-22215 1,390.50 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006295 10/25/2024 Social Security 102-22215 4,772.68 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006296 10/25/2024 State Withholding 102-22220 2,810.43 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006297 10/25/2024 Federal Tax Withholding 102-22210 5,433.76 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006300 11/05/2024 SDI 102-22225 150.75 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006301 11/05/2024 Medicare 102-22215 397.34 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006302 11/05/2024 Social Security 102-22215 1,699.06 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006303 11/05/2024 State Withholding 102-22220 56.31 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006304 11/05/2024 Federal Tax Withholding 102-22210 195.82 Fund 102 - Fire General Total: 23,052.19
Fund: 105 - Community Outreach
A&G PUMPING 323008 10/28/2024 RESTROOM RENTAL - MARKET…105-105-78100.000 475.75 VERIZON WIRELESS 323036 10/28/2024 CELL PHONES - PW 105-105-64600.000 89.12 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRIC… 322972 10/21/2024 GASOLINE/DIESEL 105-105-66100.000 67.77 VERONICA ALBINO 322979 10/21/2024 OCTOBER SENIOR SOCIAL EVE… 105-105-68200.000 200.00 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRIC… 323073 11/01/2024 GASOLINE/FUEL 105-105-66100.000 63.08 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006293 10/25/2024 SDI 105-22225 57.22 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006294 10/25/2024 Medicare 105-22215 150.88 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006295 10/25/2024 Social Security 105-22215 645.12 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006296 10/25/2024 State Withholding 105-22220 104.44 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006297 10/25/2024 Federal Tax Withholding 105-22210 343.28 ADALAY ANDRADE 323038 11/01/2024 CA Volunteers Intern Stipend 105-105-63900.000 5,334.00 AARON BENJAMIN CHAVEZ 323037 11/01/2024 CA Volunteers Intern Stipend 105-105-63900.000 5,890.50 AUGUSTINE S. LEDESMA 323040 11/01/2024 CA Volunteers Intern Stipend 105-105-63900.000 2,871.38 IZAIAH MICHAEL CAMARENA … 323055 11/01/2024 CA Volunteers Intern Stipend 105-105-63900.000 2,617.88 FREDDY SUAREZ LOPEZ 323048 11/01/2024 CA Volunteers Stipend 105-105-63900.000 3,690.38 IMANI JUBILEE HARRIGAN 323054 11/01/2024 CA Volunteers Intern Stipend 105-105-63900.000 4,294.50 ELIZABETH LOPEZ 323046 11/01/2024 CA Volunteers Intern Stipend 105-105-63900.000 2,671.50 RIQUELINO OSORIO DE JESUS 323070 11/01/2024 CA Volunteers Intern Stipend 105-105-63900.000 219.38 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POLICY G… 323041 11/01/2024 GREENFIELD GRANT WRITING …105-105-68200.000 4,750.00 Fund 105 - Community Outreach Total: 34,536.18
Fund: 200 - SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
JOSEPH DYELS 323057 11/01/2024 PER-DIEM - LE TACTICAL APPL… 200-205-67200.000 348.00 JORGE GUTIERREZ 323056 11/01/2024 PER-DIEM - LE TACTICAL APPL… 200-205-67200.000 348.00 JUSTIN MATTKE 323059 11/01/2024 PER-DIEM - IACP 40 UNDER 40…200-205-67200.000 395.00 GUILLERMO H MIXER 323052 11/01/2024 IACP CONVENTION TRAINING-…200-205-67200.000 3,180.74 Fund 200 - SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT Total: 4,271.74 Fund: 201 - POLICE - OTHER GRANTS
APEX INTEGRATED DISTRIBUT… 322939 10/21/2024 250 MOUTHPIECES 201-215-65414.000 100.14 Fund 201 - POLICE - OTHER GRANTS Total: 100.14
Fund: 220 - Supplemental Transactions & Use Tax Fund (V & W) DRIVE CUSTOMS 322947 10/21/2024 2-WAY RADIO INSTALLATION/… 220-215-71400.000 250.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 323080 11/01/2024 CELL PHONES - POLICE DEPT 220-605-64600.000 120.48 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006282 10/25/2024 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 220-22430 230.73 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006284 10/25/2024 Defer Comp-GPOA 220-22430 1,890.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006285 10/25/2024 Defer Comp-GPSA 220-22430 850.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006287 10/25/2024 Defer Comp-Mid Management 220-22430 100.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006288 10/25/2024 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 220-22430 550.00 Greenfield Professional Firefig…323005 10/24/2024 Fire Union Dues 220-22410 103.42 G P O A 323003 10/24/2024 GPOA DUES 220-22410 960.00
OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL…323006 10/24/2024 Union Dues 220-22420 127.40 GREENFIELD POLICE SERGEAN… 323004 10/24/2024 GPSA DUES 220-22415 300.00 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006293 10/25/2024 SDI 220-22225 1,790.98 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006294 10/25/2024 Medicare 220-22215 4,817.94 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006295 10/25/2024 Social Security 220-22215 14,423.74 8 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 10/17/2024 - 11/7/2024 11/7/2024 3:11:30 PM Page 5 of 14
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006296 10/25/2024 State Withholding 220-22220 9,124.78 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006297 10/25/2024 Federal Tax Withholding 220-22210 20,726.83 Fund 220 - Supplemental Transactions & Use Tax Fund (V & W) Total: 56,366.30 Fund: 230 - GAS TAX FUND
GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 323021 10/28/2024 SEAL LIQUID 230-320-65700.000 54.53 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC. 323083 11/01/2024 STREET SIGNS 230-320-65700.000 2,343.88 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 9 10/28/2024 TRAFFIC LIGHTS WALNUT/3RD 230-320-64100.000 273.43 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 9 10/28/2024 TRAFFIC LIGHTS ECR/OAK 230-320-64100.000 97.20 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 323051 11/01/2024 CONCRETE MIX 230-320-65700.000 13.69 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 9 10/28/2024 TRAFFIC LIGHTS ECR/ELM 230-320-64100.000 94.20 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 9 10/28/2024 TRAFFIC LIGHTS ECR/TYLER 230-320-64100.000 84.47 THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO… 323076 11/01/2024 YELLOW PAINT AND GLASS BE… 230-320-65700.000 1,916.25 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 11 11/01/2024 STREET LIGHTS HIGH SCHOOL 230-320-64100.000 350.30 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 8 10/21/2024 CITY ENGINEERING SERVICES 230-320-63700.000 875.00 Fund 230 - GAS TAX FUND Total: 6,102.95
Fund: 263 - LLM #1 - LEXINGTON
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 9 10/28/2024 CAMBRIA - CARDONA CIR 263-360-64100.000 138.91 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 9 10/28/2024 LLMD LEXINGTON 263-360-64100.000 115.69 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 9 10/28/2024 VINEYARD GREEN 263-360-64100.000 172.53 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 11 11/01/2024 LLMD MARIPOSA 263-360-64100.000 232.00 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAP… 323072 11/01/2024 LEXINGTON SQUARE SUBDIVIS…263-360-63900.000 1,695.00 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAP… 323072 11/01/2024 MARIPOSA PLACE 263-360-63900.000 715.00 SEIU Local 521 323007 10/24/2024 Union Dues 263-22420 5.68 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006293 10/25/2024 SDI 263-22225 10.51 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006294 10/25/2024 Medicare 263-22215 27.66 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006295 10/25/2024 Social Security 263-22215 118.44 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006296 10/25/2024 State Withholding 263-22220 32.18 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006297 10/25/2024 Federal Tax Withholding 263-22210 89.52 Fund 263 - LLM #1 - LEXINGTON Total: 3,353.12
Fund: 264 - LLM #2 - TERRA VERDE, ETC
MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-371-105-… 264-360-68700.000 27.48 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-391-081-… 264-360-68700.000 23.54 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-401-011-… 264-360-68700.000 20.48 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-391-083-… 264-360-68700.000 20.04 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-381-097-… 264-360-68700.000 18.50 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-391-079-… 264-360-68700.000 31.76 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 9 10/28/2024 ST. CHRISTOPHER PARK 264-360-64100.000 38.22 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 9 10/28/2024 ST, CHARLES COMMERCIAL A… 264-360-64100.000 689.24 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 9 10/28/2024 HUERTA RESIDENTIAL/VAZQU… 264-360-64100.000 120.48 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAP… 323072 11/01/2024 ST CHARLES STREETSCAPE AN… 264-360-63900.000 2,625.00 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAP… 323072 11/01/2024 TERRA VERDE SUBDIVISION 264-360-63900.000 1,710.00 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAP… 323072 11/01/2024 ST CHARLES GAZEBO 264-360-63900.000 1,135.00 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAP… 323072 11/01/2024 ST. CHRISTOPHER PARK 264-360-63900.000 1,115.00 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAP… 323072 11/01/2024 TRADITIONS SUBDIVISION 264-360-63900.000 3,200.00 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAP… 323072 11/01/2024 LA VINA SUBDIVISION, PHASE …264-360-63900.000 3,510.00 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAP… 323072 11/01/2024 BAROLO PARK 264-360-63900.000 220.00 SEIU Local 521 323007 10/24/2024 Union Dues 264-22420 5.68 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006293 10/25/2024 SDI 264-22225 10.51 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006294 10/25/2024 Medicare 264-22215 27.66 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006295 10/25/2024 Social Security 264-22215 118.44 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006296 10/25/2024 State Withholding 264-22220 32.18 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006297 10/25/2024 Federal Tax Withholding 264-22210 89.52 Fund 264 - LLM #2 - TERRA VERDE, ETC Total: 14,788.73
Fund: 265 - SMD #1
MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-391-082-… 265-360-68700.000 21.70 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-371-104-… 265-360-68700.000 55.58 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-381-098-… 265-360-68700.000 18.50 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-381-099-… 265-360-68700.000 18.50 SEIU Local 521 323007 10/24/2024 Union Dues 265-22420 5.65 9 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 10/17/2024 - 11/7/2024 11/7/2024 3:11:30 PM Page 6 of 14
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006293 10/25/2024 SDI 265-22225 10.48 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006294 10/25/2024 Medicare 265-22215 27.58 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006295 10/25/2024 Social Security 265-22215 118.08 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006296 10/25/2024 State Withholding 265-22220 32.05 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006297 10/25/2024 Federal Tax Withholding 265-22210 89.14 Fund 265 - SMD #1 Total: 397.26
Fund: 266 - SMD #2
MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 109-224-059-… 266-360-68700.000 49.22 SEIU Local 521 323007 10/24/2024 Union Dues 266-22420 5.65 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006293 10/25/2024 SDI 266-22225 10.46 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006294 10/25/2024 Medicare 266-22215 27.72 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006295 10/25/2024 Social Security 266-22215 118.42 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006296 10/25/2024 State Withholding 266-22220 32.21 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006297 10/25/2024 Federal Tax Withholding 266-22210 89.54 Fund 266 - SMD #2 Total: 333.22
Fund: 267 - Vintage Meadows LLMD #3
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 11 11/01/2024 VINTAGE MEADOWS PHASE 267-360-64100.000 436.70 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 11 11/01/2024 SYCAMORE ST 267-360-64100.000 9.82 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 11 11/01/2024 LLMD IRRIGATION 267-360-64100.000 9.82 Fund 267 - Vintage Meadows LLMD #3 Total: 456.34
Fund: 297 - GREENFIELD SCIENCE WORKSHOP
MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 024-103-001-… 297-597-68700.000 147.44 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 323023 10/28/2024 FAUCET HOSES - BUILDING MA…297-597-65500.000 15.91 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 323023 10/28/2024 PAINT - SCIENCE MOBILE 297-597-65500.000 37.76 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 323023 10/28/2024 FAUCET/CEILING LIGHTS - BUI… 297-597-65500.000 202.94 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 323023 10/28/2024 CHALKBOARD PAINT - SCIENCE…297-597-65500.000 37.76 VERIZON WIRELESS 323036 10/28/2024 CELL PHONES - PW 297-597-64600.000 126.18 VERIZON 323035 10/28/2024 GPS SERVICES FY-24/25 297-597-64900.000 76.00 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRIC… 322972 10/21/2024 GASOLINE/DIESEL 297-597-66100.000 542.18 MONTEREY COUNTY OFFICE O…322959 10/21/2024 CA STATE PARKS OEP GRANT -…297-598-65100.204 996.00 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRIC… 323073 11/01/2024 GASOLINE/FUEL 297-597-66100.000 504.61 ALL SAFE INTEGRATED SYSTE… 323010 10/28/2024 QUARTERLY ALARM MONITOR…297-597-63900.000 114.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006286 10/25/2024 Defer Comp-Management 297-22430 879.00 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006293 10/25/2024 SDI 297-22225 206.29 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006294 10/25/2024 Medicare 297-22215 543.84 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006295 10/25/2024 Social Security 297-22215 2,325.34 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006296 10/25/2024 State Withholding 297-22220 621.85 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006297 10/25/2024 Federal Tax Withholding 297-22210 1,698.00 Fund 297 - GREENFIELD SCIENCE WORKSHOP Total: 9,075.10
Fund: 375 - RISK MANAGEMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006299 10/28/2024 UNEMPLOYMNET INSURANCE…375-115-52200.000 9,864.00 MONTEREY BAY AREA SELF IN… 323061 11/01/2024 CLAIM # GHC0059033 - J. LOP… 375-115-62110.000 48.50 Fund 375 - RISK MANAGEMENT Total: 9,912.50
Fund: 385 - INTERNAL SERVICE
O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 322964 10/21/2024 LP HARDWARE 385-311-65700.000 8.08 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 322964 10/21/2024 LP HARDWARE CREDIT 385-311-65700.000 -8.08 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 322964 10/21/2024 BRAKE FLUID 385-311-65700.000 8.37 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 322964 10/21/2024 COTTER PINS 385-311-65700.000 3.84 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 322964 10/21/2024 7330 - MULTI SOCK 385-311-65000.000 -13.35 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 322964 10/21/2024 7914 - MICRO-V BELT 385-311-65000.000 -32.85 GREENFIELD TOWING 322953 10/21/2024 7345 - TOWING SERVICE 385-311-65000.000 200.00 ROBIN WARBEY CONSULTING 323032 10/28/2024 IT CONSULTING SERVICES FY 2…385-125-63200.000 3,960.00 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 322943 10/21/2024 INTERNET SERVICES 385-125-61700.000 10.00 SALINAS VALLEY FORD 322968 10/21/2024 7330 - CATALYTIC CONVERT, … 385-311-65000.000 2,077.21 VERIZON WIRELESS 323036 10/28/2024 CELL PHONES - PW 385-125-64600.000 42.06 VERIZON WIRELESS 323036 10/28/2024 CELL PHONES - PW 385-160-64600.000 42.06 VERIZON WIRELESS 323036 10/28/2024 CELL PHONES - PW 385-311-64600.000 42.06 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 322964 10/21/2024 ADAPTER SET 385-311-65700.000 9.84 VERIZON 323035 10/28/2024 GPS SERVICES FY-24/25 385-311-64900.000 19.00 10 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 10/17/2024 - 11/7/2024 11/7/2024 3:11:30 PM Page 7 of 14
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount CINTAS CORPORATION #630 322944 10/21/2024 UNIFORMS 385-311-65200.000 24.14 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 322944 10/21/2024 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 385-311-65600.000 30.27 SALINAS VALLEY FORD 322968 10/21/2024 7330 - CATA 385-311-65000.000 -273.13 NAPA AUTO PARTS 323028 10/28/2024 7921 - CLUTCH MASTER 385-311-65000.000 162.46 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRIC… 322972 10/21/2024 GASOLINE/DIESEL 385-311-66100.000 203.32 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 322964 10/21/2024 7342 - AIR/OIL FILTER 385-311-65000.000 31.39 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 322964 10/21/2024 7342 - AIR/OIL FILTER 385-311-65000.000 33.47 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 322964 10/21/2024 7342 - AIR/OIL FILTER 385-311-65000.000 -31.39 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 323030 10/28/2024 7921 - CLUTCH 385-311-65000.000 8.75 MY JEEP-CHRYSLER-DODGE-R… 323027 10/28/2024 7346 - AA ROTOR AND AF PAD…385-311-65000.000 615.30 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 323030 10/28/2024 7939 - LED LITE BAR 385-311-65000.000 87.59 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 323030 10/28/2024 7918 - FUEL FILTER 385-311-65000.000 7.68 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 323030 10/28/2024 7202 - AIR/OIL FILTER AND FU… 385-311-65000.000 131.48 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 322944 10/21/2024 UNIFORMS 385-311-65200.000 24.14 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 322944 10/21/2024 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 385-311-65600.000 30.27 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 323030 10/28/2024 7202 - MINI BULB 385-311-65000.000 7.91 NAPA AUTO PARTS 323028 10/28/2024 7342 PARTS 385-311-65000.000 595.21 DELL MARKETING, L.P. 323017 10/28/2024 SRO2 LAPTOP 385-125-65300.000 1,157.21 NAPA AUTO PARTS 323028 10/28/2024 7342 - RADIATOR 385-311-65000.000 331.47 NAPA AUTO PARTS 323028 10/28/2024 NITRILE GLOVES 385-311-65700.000 93.63 GREENFIELD TOWING 323020 10/28/2024 7348 - TOWING SERVICE 385-311-66200.000 200.00 ANA M. CORDERO 323011 10/28/2024 SPANISH ORAL TEST - M. PEREZ 385-160-63900.000 135.00 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 323067 11/01/2024 TIRE CEMENT 385-311-65700.000 9.93 HM SUPPLIES, INC. 323022 10/28/2024 NUTS/WASHERS 385-311-65700.000 111.98 AGILE OCCUPATIONAL MEDIC… 323009 10/28/2024 ALCOHOL TESTING SERVICES 385-160-63900.000 150.00 GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 323050 11/01/2024 7342 - WORMGEAR CLAMP 385-311-65000.000 23.22 TPX COMMUNICATIONS 323034 10/28/2024 TELEPHONE SERVICES 385-125-64500.000 2,043.37 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 323043 11/01/2024 UNIFORMS 385-311-65200.000 24.14 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 323043 11/01/2024 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 385-311-65600.000 30.27 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRIC… 323073 11/01/2024 GASOLINE/FUEL 385-311-66100.000 189.23 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 11 11/01/2024 CITY CAMERAS 385-125-61700.000 1,135.50 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 323067 11/01/2024 7346 - KEYLESS 385-311-65000.000 12.03 NAPA AUTO PARTS 323064 11/01/2024 7923 - CLASS I BATTERY 385-311-65000.000 259.27 T-MOBILE 323077 11/01/2024 INTERNET BACKUP SERVICES 385-125-61700.000 163.40 DELL MARKETING, L.P. 323017 10/28/2024 MONITOR - FINANCE DEPT 385-125-65300.000 354.50 NICK'S GARAGE 323065 11/01/2024 7342 - DIAGNOSTIC/PARTS 385-311-65000.000 141.22 NICK'S GARAGE 323065 11/01/2024 7342 - DIAGNOSTIC/PARTS 385-311-66200.000 120.00 SALINAS VALLEY FORD 323071 11/01/2024 7912 - COIL ASM/SPARK 385-311-65000.000 201.35 ROBIN WARBEY CONSULTING 323032 10/28/2024 ART CENTER ACCESS POINTS 385-125-65300.000 2,704.21 ANTHEM - BLUE CROSS DFT0006298 10/25/2024 INSURANCE FY 2024-2025 - N… 385-180-52510.000 118,539.93 VALENTIN VELASQUEZ 323079 11/01/2024 REIMBURSEMENT - DMV MED…385-160-63900.000 150.00 LEGAL NOTIFICATION SERVICE…323060 11/01/2024 PD ISUBPOENA SOFTWARE M… 385-125-61700.000 1,903.56 U.S. Bank Equipment Finance 323078 11/01/2024 COPIER ANNUAL LEASE 385-125-61700.000 4,347.77 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 323074 11/01/2024 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 385-311-65600.000 66.58 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006286 10/25/2024 Defer Comp-Management 385-22430 150.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006287 10/25/2024 Defer Comp-Mid Management 385-22430 80.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006288 10/25/2024 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 385-22430 60.00 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006293 10/25/2024 SDI 385-22225 140.50 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006294 10/25/2024 Medicare 385-22215 370.36 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006295 10/25/2024 Social Security 385-22215 1,583.74 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006296 10/25/2024 State Withholding 385-22220 707.05 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006297 10/25/2024 Federal Tax Withholding 385-22210 1,671.49 AGILE OCCUPATIONAL MEDIC… 323039 11/01/2024 EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXA… 385-160-68100.000 565.00 Fund 385 - INTERNAL SERVICE Total: 147,984.01
Fund: 390 - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
NJA ARCHITECTURE 323066 11/01/2024 NEW COMMUNITY CENTER-A… 390-390-89141.000 6,087.50 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 8 10/21/2024 CITY ENGINEERING SERVICES 390-390-83145.000 1,095.00 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 8 10/21/2024 12TH ST. FROM OAK TO ELM … 390-390-83146.000 28,240.50 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 8 10/21/2024 12TH ST. FROM OAK TO ELM … 390-390-83146.000 9,408.00 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 10 11/01/2024 WALNUT AVE SIDEWALK/BIKE… 390-390-83141.000 6,932.50 11 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 10/17/2024 - 11/7/2024 11/7/2024 3:11:30 PM Page 8 of 14
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 10 11/01/2024 GREENFIELD ENTRY WAY SIGN 390-390-89115.000 110.00 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 10 11/01/2024 2023 PAVEMENT MANAGEM… 390-390-83142.000 2,006.25 MONTEREY PENINSULA ENGI… 323063 11/01/2024 12TH. STREET IMPROVEMENT… 390-390-83146.000 330,569.60 Fund 390 - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Total: 384,449.35
Fund: 503 - SEWER FUND
NEW SV MEDIA, INC 322962 10/21/2024 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 503-390-89132.000 327.31 SOUTH COUNTY TIRE, LLC 322971 10/21/2024 3738 - SERVICE CALL & LABOR… 503-335-66300.000 127.50 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 109-031-013-… 503-330-68700.000 3,896.38 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 109-031-005-… 503-330-68700.000 4,795.14 DENISE DUFFY & ASSOCIATES, …322946 10/21/2024 WWTP - CEQA/NEPA REVIEW … 503-390-89132.000 9,730.85 OFFICE DEPOT 322963 10/21/2024 UB RECEIPT PAPER ROLLS 503-191-61400.000 38.05 SOUTH COUNTY TIRE, LLC 322971 10/21/2024 3737 - REPLACE REAR TIRE 503-335-66300.000 137.04 HACH COMPANY 322955 10/21/2024 PH BUFFER SOLUTION 503-335-65700.000 55.09 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES 322976 10/21/2024 INSITE TRANSACTION FEES - U…503-191-63300.000 2,059.37 VERIZON WIRELESS 323036 10/28/2024 CELL PHONES - PW 503-330-64600.000 84.12 PACIFIC AG RENTALS, LLC 322966 10/21/2024 WWTP SHORT TERM TRACTOR…503-335-63900.000 6,657.60 CITY OF SOLEDAD 323014 10/28/2024 SLUDGE REMOVAL DUMPING …503-335-63800.000 2,380.00 VERIZON 323035 10/28/2024 GPS SERVICES FY-24/25 503-330-64900.000 57.00 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 322954 10/21/2024 ELECTRIC TAPE 503-335-65700.000 17.36 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 322944 10/21/2024 UNIFORMS 503-333-65200.000 69.56 CASEY PRINTING 322942 10/21/2024 UTILITY BILLS FY 2024-2025 503-191-61200.000 450.07 CASEY PRINTING 322942 10/21/2024 UTILITY BILLS FY 2024-2025 503-191-63800.000 450.07 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRIC… 322972 10/21/2024 GASOLINE/DIESEL 503-335-66100.000 822.99 OR-TEC, INC. 322965 10/21/2024 OR-TEC MARK II SLUDGE DEW… 503-335-63900.000 10,750.00 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 323069 11/01/2024 7730 - SWAY BLOCK 503-335-66300.000 785.20 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 322944 10/21/2024 UNIFORMS 503-333-65200.000 69.56 GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 323050 11/01/2024 SPARK PLUG - SPRAYFIELD P… 503-335-65700.000 2.91 CITY OF SOLEDAD 323044 11/01/2024 SLUDGE REMOVAL DUMPING …503-335-63800.000 2,975.00 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 11 11/01/2024 WASTEWATER TREATMENT P… 503-335-64100.000 5,259.61 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 323043 11/01/2024 UNIFORMS 503-333-65200.000 69.56 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 322964 10/21/2024 GREASE 503-335-65700.000 118.13 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 8 10/21/2024 CITY ENGINEERING SERVICES 503-330-63700.000 550.00 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 8 10/21/2024 WWTP DESIGN ENVIRONMEN… 503-390-89132.000 12,420.00 DENISE DUFFY & ASSOCIATES, …322946 10/21/2024 WWTP - CEQA/NEPA REVIEW … 503-390-89132.000 7,825.00 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRIC… 323073 11/01/2024 GASOLINE/FUEL 503-335-66100.000 315.38 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 323051 11/01/2024 GLOVES 503-335-65700.000 27.36 WALLACE GROUP 323081 11/01/2024 WWTP-COMPLIANCE AND PR… 503-335-63800.000 428.75 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 323069 11/01/2024 7730 - CORRECT CODE ALERT … 503-335-66300.000 533.78 CALIFORNIA STRATEGIES & A… 323042 11/01/2024 LOBBYING & RELATED CONSU… 503-330-63900.000 15,000.00 SEIU Local 521 323007 10/24/2024 COPE - Union Dues 503-22420 10.52 SEIU Local 521 323007 10/24/2024 Union Dues 503-22420 209.61 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006281 10/25/2024 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 503-22430 111.04 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006286 10/25/2024 Defer Comp-Management 503-22430 70.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006288 10/25/2024 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 503-22430 37.51 DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERV…DFT0006291 10/25/2024 Misc Withholding 503-22450 798.36 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006293 10/25/2024 SDI 503-22225 241.12 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006294 10/25/2024 Medicare 503-22215 635.68 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006295 10/25/2024 Social Security 503-22215 2,717.54 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006296 10/25/2024 State Withholding 503-22220 720.83 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006297 10/25/2024 Federal Tax Withholding 503-22210 1,923.93 Fund 503 - SEWER FUND Total: 96,761.88
Fund: 504 - WATER FUND
GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 322951 10/21/2024 MARKING PAINT 504-345-65700.000 617.31 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 109-181-016-… 504-340-68700.000 79.42 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 109-271-014-… 504-340-68700.000 498.16 MONTEREY COUNTY TAX COL… 323025 10/28/2024 ASSESSMENT # 109-271-008-… 504-340-68700.000 493.18 OFFICE DEPOT 322963 10/21/2024 UB RECEIPT PAPER ROLLS 504-191-61400.000 38.05 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES 322976 10/21/2024 INSITE TRANSACTION FEES - U…504-191-63300.000 2,059.38 GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 322951 10/21/2024 WATER SERVICE SUPPLIES 504-345-65700.000 72.59 G&C CONSULTING, INC. 323018 10/28/2024 GM SERVICES 504-12393 3,000.00 12 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 10/17/2024 - 11/7/2024 11/7/2024 3:11:30 PM Page 9 of 14
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount G&C CONSULTING, INC. 323018 10/28/2024 GM SERVICES 504-390-86206.000 3,000.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 323036 10/28/2024 CELL PHONES - PW 504-340-64600.000 84.12 GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 323050 11/01/2024 PVC - WATER SERVICE 504-345-65700.000 273.97 VERIZON 323035 10/28/2024 GPS SERVICES FY-24/25 504-340-64900.000 38.00 CORE & MAIN LP 323016 10/28/2024 WATER SUPPLIES 504-345-65700.000 2,180.21 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 322944 10/21/2024 UNIFORMS 504-345-65200.000 69.56 WM. J. CLARK TRUCKING SERV…323082 11/01/2024 LOOSE CONCRETE - WATER SE…504-345-65700.000 486.84 AT&T 323012 10/28/2024 WATER LINES 504-345-64500.000 66.99 CASEY PRINTING 322942 10/21/2024 UTILITY BILLS FY 2024-2025 504-191-61200.000 450.07 CASEY PRINTING 322942 10/21/2024 UTILITY BILLS FY 2024-2025 504-191-63800.000 450.07 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRIC… 322972 10/21/2024 GASOLINE/DIESEL 504-340-66100.000 822.99 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 323024 10/28/2024 LEGAL SERVICES - ARROYO SE… 504-12105 136.50 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 323024 10/28/2024 LEGAL SERVICES - ARROYO SE… 504-390-86206.000 136.50 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 322944 10/21/2024 UNIFORMS 504-345-65200.000 69.56 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 11 11/01/2024 10TH STREET WELL 504-345-64100.000 524.71 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 11 11/01/2024 13TH/OAK WELL 504-345-64100.000 1,981.47 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 323043 11/01/2024 UNIFORMS 504-345-65200.000 69.56 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 8 10/21/2024 APPLE AVE FARM HOUSING … 504-390-86210.000 1,455.00 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 8 10/21/2024 APPLE AVE FARM HOUSING … 504-390-86210.000 800.00 SOUTHERN COUNTIES LUBRIC… 323073 11/01/2024 GASOLINE/FUEL 504-340-66100.000 315.38 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 10 11/01/2024 APPLE AVE FARM HOUSING … 504-390-86210.000 400.00 SEIU Local 521 323007 10/24/2024 COPE - Union Dues 504-22420 15.27 SEIU Local 521 323007 10/24/2024 Union Dues 504-22420 222.16 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006281 10/25/2024 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 504-22430 111.02 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006286 10/25/2024 Defer Comp-Management 504-22430 70.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006288 10/25/2024 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 504-22430 37.49 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006293 10/25/2024 SDI 504-22225 247.36 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006294 10/25/2024 Medicare 504-22215 652.04 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006295 10/25/2024 Social Security 504-22215 2,788.38 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006296 10/25/2024 State Withholding 504-22220 784.41 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006297 10/25/2024 Federal Tax Withholding 504-22210 1,787.58 Fund 504 - WATER FUND Total: 27,385.30
Grand Total: 1,082,842.92
13 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 10/17/2024 - 11/7/2024 11/7/2024 3:11:30 PM Page 10 of 14
Report Summary
Fund Summary
Fund Payment Amount
100 - GENERAL FUND 263,516.61
102 - Fire General 23,052.19
105 - Community Outreach 34,536.18
200 - SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 4,271.74
201 - POLICE - OTHER GRANTS 100.14
220 - Supplemental Transactions & Use Tax Fund (V & W) 56,366.30 230 - GAS TAX FUND 6,102.95
263 - LLM #1 - LEXINGTON 3,353.12
264 - LLM #2 - TERRA VERDE, ETC 14,788.73
265 - SMD #1 397.26
266 - SMD #2 333.22
267 - Vintage Meadows LLMD #3 456.34
297 - GREENFIELD SCIENCE WORKSHOP 9,075.10
375 - RISK MANAGEMENT 9,912.50
385 - INTERNAL SERVICE 147,984.01
390 - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 384,449.35
503 - SEWER FUND 96,761.88
504 - WATER FUND 27,385.30
Grand Total: 1,082,842.92
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Payment Amount
100-101-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 190.05
100-110-63900.000 General Services 126.00
100-110-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 42.06
100-110-64900.000 Other Utilities 19.00
100-110-68700.000 Property Taxes 36.04
100-111-61200.000 Printing and Copying 192.95
100-111-64100.000 Electricity 36,920.19
100-111-64200.000 Gas Utility 303.09
100-111-65100.000 General Operating Suppl… 183.25
100-111-65600.000 Janitorial Supplies 338.07
100-111-65700.000 Public Works Supplies 90.28
100-111-65900.000 Building Maintenance S… 218.36
100-111-66100.000 Gasoline & Oil 130.85
100-111-68700.000 Property Taxes 80.80
100-150-63100.000 Administration Services 14,865.09
100-170-67100.000 Meetings & Conferences 250.94
100-190-61200.000 Printing and Copying 114.49
100-190-63300.000 Financial Services 3,777.72
100-191-64400.000 Waste Disposal 75,990.92
100-201-65100.000 General Operating Suppl… 184.93
100-201-65200.000 Uniforms/Personnel Equ… 29.67
100-201-65900.000 Building Maintenance S… 9.46
100-201-67200.000 Other Training 561.61
100-215-63400.000 Police Services 568.01
100-215-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 1,761.04
100-215-64900.000 Other Utilities 361.00
100-215-65100.000 General Operating Suppl… 156.00
100-215-65400.000 Police Supplies 41.45
100-215-66100.000 Gasoline & Oil 8,897.73
100-22210 Federal Withholding Tax… 16,149.26
100-22215 FICA Payable 18,642.67
100-22220 State Withholding Tax P… 6,334.94
100-22225 S.D.I. Payable 1,582.31
100-22410 G.P.O.A. Union Dues Pay… 320.00
100-22415 G.P.S.A. Union Dues Pay… 300.00
14 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 10/17/2024 - 11/7/2024 11/7/2024 3:11:30 PM Page 11 of 14
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Payment Amount
100-22420 S.E.I.U. Union Dues Paya… 395.89
100-22430 Deferred Comp Payable 3,815.17
100-22431 Roth 4,056.50
100-22435 PERS Loan Payable 832.29
100-22481 POLICE AMMUNITION 86.68
100-22565 Planning Deposits - 201 E… 260.00
100-230-63400.000 Animal Control Services 15,908.00
100-230-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 125.46
100-230-65600.000 Janitorial Supplies 73.91
100-24718 Civil Review Deposit - Wa… 440.00
100-24720 Civil Review Deposit - Gr… 1,514.00
100-25105 Building Deposits – Cons… 12,328.84
100-26165 State Building Standards… 4.00
100-310-63700.000 Public Works Services 1,102.50
100-310-64900.000 Other Utilities 19.00
100-320-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 21.03
100-320-64900.000 Other Utilities 57.00
100-320-65200.000 Uniforms / Personnel Eq… 392.02
100-320-65700.000 Public Works Supplies 234.79
100-320-66100.000 Gasoline & Oil 576.39
100-320-66300.000 General Operations Equi… 57.61
100-320-68700.000 Property Taxes 321.16
100-42105.000 Construction Permits 471.44
100-44285.000 AB717 Education Fee 57.90
100-550-64100.000 Electricity 196.36
100-550-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 21.03
100-550-64900.000 Other Utilities 38.00
100-550-65200.000 Uniforms/Personnel Equ… 392.02
100-550-65600.000 Janitorial Supplies 75.52
100-550-65700.000 Public Works Supplies 1,606.32
100-550-66100.000 Gasoline & Oil 673.21
100-550-68700.000 Property Taxes 1,847.60
100-551-63500.000 Recreation Services 520.00
100-551-64100.000 Electricity 863.71
100-551-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 313.07
100-551-64900.000 Other Utilities 19.00
100-551-65900.000 Building Maintenance S… 556.00
100-551-66100.221 Gasoline & Oil 261.70
100-551-68700.000 Property Taxes 3,223.34
100-590-63900.000 General Services 150.00
100-590-65900.000 Building Maintenance S… 834.06
100-601-63600.000 Community Developmen… 17,574.27
100-601-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 42.06
100-601-66100.000 Gasoline & Oil 130.85
100-601-67100.000 Meetings & Conferences 1,256.68
102-22210 Federal Withholding Tax… 5,629.58
102-22215 FICA Payable 8,259.58
102-22220 State Withholding Tax P… 2,866.74
102-22225 S.D.I Payable 678.18
102-22410 Union Dues Payable 211.58
102-22430 Deferred Comp Payable 463.20
102-22450 Wage Garnishments Pay… 346.15
102-250-63600.000 Community Developmen… 725.00
102-250-64100.000 Electricity 1,330.20
102-250-64200.000 Gas Utility 89.92
102-250-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 168.24
102-250-65200.000 Uniforms/Personnel Equ… 144.61
102-250-65600.000 Jantorial Supplies 52.74
15 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 10/17/2024 - 11/7/2024 11/7/2024 3:11:30 PM Page 12 of 14
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Payment Amount
102-250-65900.000 Building Maintenance S… 569.19
102-250-66100.000 Gasoline & Oil 987.90
102-250-67200.000 Other Training 325.00
102-250-68700.000 Property Taxes 204.38
105-105-63900.000 General Services 27,589.52
105-105-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 89.12
105-105-66100.000 Gasoline & Oil 130.85
105-105-68200.000 Community Outreach 4,950.00
105-105-78100.000 Community Events 475.75
105-22210 Federal Withholding Tax… 343.28
105-22215 FICA Payable 796.00
105-22220 State Withholding Tax P… 104.44
105-22225 S.D.I. Payable 57.22
200-205-67200.000 Other Training 4,271.74
201-215-65414.000 CHP Cannabis Tax Fund … 100.14
220-215-71400.000 Police Equipment 250.00
220-22210 Federal Withholding Tax… 20,726.83
220-22215 FICA Payable 19,241.68
220-22220 State Withholding Tax P… 9,124.78
220-22225 S.D.I. Payable 1,790.98
220-22410 G.P.O.A. Union Dues Pay… 1,063.42
220-22415 G.P.S.A. Union Dues Pay… 300.00
220-22420 S.E.I.U. Union Dues Paya… 127.40
220-22430 Deferred Comp Payable 3,620.73
220-605-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 120.48
230-320-63700.000 Public Works Services 875.00
230-320-64100.000 Electricity 899.60
230-320-65700.000 Public Works Supplies 4,328.35
263-22210 Federal Withholding Tax… 89.52
263-22215 FICA Payable 146.10
263-22220 State Withholding Tax P… 32.18
263-22225 S.D.I. Payable 10.51
263-22420 S.E.I.U. Union Dues Paya… 5.68
263-360-63900.000 General Services 2,410.00
263-360-64100.000 Electricity 659.13
264-22210 Federal Withholding Tax… 89.52
264-22215 FICA Payable 146.10
264-22220 State Withholding Tax P… 32.18
264-22225 S.D.I. Payable 10.51
264-22420 S.E.I.U. Union Dues Paya… 5.68
264-360-63900.000 General Services 13,515.00
264-360-64100.000 Electricity 847.94
264-360-68700.000 Property Taxes 141.80
265-22210 Federal Withholding Tax… 89.14
265-22215 FICA Payable 145.66
265-22220 State Withholding Tax P… 32.05
265-22225 S.D.I. Payable 10.48
265-22420 S.E.I.U. Union Dues Paya… 5.65
265-360-68700.000 Property Taxes 114.28
266-22210 Federal Withholding Tax… 89.54
266-22215 FICA Payable 146.14
266-22220 State Withholding Tax P… 32.21
266-22225 S.D.I. Payable 10.46
266-22420 S.E.I.U. Union Dues Paya… 5.65
266-360-68700.000 Property Taxes 49.22
267-360-64100.000 Electricity 456.34
297-22210 Federal Withholding Tax… 1,698.00
297-22215 FICA Payable 2,869.18
16 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 10/17/2024 - 11/7/2024 11/7/2024 3:11:30 PM Page 13 of 14
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Payment Amount
297-22220 State Withholding Tax P… 621.85
297-22225 S.D.I. Payable 206.29
297-22430 Deferred Comp Payable 879.00
297-597-63900.000 General Services 114.00
297-597-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 126.18
297-597-64900.000 Other Utilities 76.00
297-597-65500.000 Recreation Supplies 294.37
297-597-66100.000 Gasoline & Oil 1,046.79
297-597-68700.000 Property Taxes 147.44
297-598-65100.204 General Operating Suppl… 996.00
375-115-52200.000 Unemployment Insurance 9,864.00
375-115-62110.000 Claims 48.50
385-125-61700.000 Software Maintenance C… 7,560.23
385-125-63200.000 Technology Services 3,960.00
385-125-64500.000 Phone Charges 2,043.37
385-125-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 42.06
385-125-65300.000 Technology Supplies 4,215.92
385-160-63900.000 General Services 435.00
385-160-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 42.06
385-160-68100.000 Recruitment 565.00
385-180-52510.000 Health Insurance 118,539.93
385-22210 Federal Withholding Tax… 1,671.49
385-22215 FICA Payable 1,954.10
385-22220 State Withholding Tax P… 707.05
385-22225 S.D.I. Payable 140.50
385-22430 Deferred Comp Payable 290.00
385-311-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 42.06
385-311-64900.000 Other Utilities 19.00
385-311-65000.000 Vehicle & Equip. Parts & … 4,576.29
385-311-65200.000 Uniforms / Personnel Eq… 72.42
385-311-65600.000 Janitorial Supplies 157.39
385-311-65700.000 Public Works Supplies 237.59
385-311-66100.000 Gasoline & Oil 392.55
385-311-66200.000 Vehicle and Equipment … 320.00
390-390-83141.000 Walnut Avenue Pedestri… 6,932.50
390-390-83142.000 3-Year Street Rehabilitat… 2,006.25
390-390-83145.000 Traffic Master Plan 1,095.00
390-390-83146.000 2306 12th Street Improv… 368,218.10
390-390-89115.000 North and South Entran… 110.00
390-390-89141.000 New Community Center 6,087.50
503-191-61200.000 Printing and Copying 450.07
503-191-61400.000 Office Supplies 38.05
503-191-63300.000 Financial Services 2,059.37
503-191-63800.000 Utility Bill Services 450.07
503-22210 Federal Withholding Tax… 1,923.93
503-22215 FICA Payable 3,353.22
503-22220 State Withholding Tax P… 720.83
503-22225 S.D.I. Payable 241.12
503-22420 S.E.I.U. Union Dues Paya… 220.13
503-22430 Deferred Comp Payable 218.55
503-22450 Wage Garnishments Pay… 798.36
503-330-63700.000 Public Works Services 550.00
503-330-63900.000 General Services 15,000.00
503-330-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 84.12
503-330-64900.000 Other Utilities 57.00
503-330-68700.000 Property Taxes 8,691.52
503-333-65200.000 Uniforms/Personnel Equ… 208.68
503-335-63800.000 Sewer & Water Services 5,783.75
17 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 10/17/2024 - 11/7/2024 11/7/2024 3:11:30 PM Page 14 of 14
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Payment Amount
503-335-63900.000 General Services 17,407.60
503-335-64100.000 Electricity 5,259.61
503-335-65700.000 Public Works Supplies 220.85
503-335-66100.000 Gasoline & Oil 1,138.37
503-335-66300.000 General Equipment Ope… 1,583.52
503-390-89132.000 New WWTP Environmen… 30,303.16
504-12105 Accounts Receivable 136.50
504-12393 Clark Colony - GSP Impl… 3,000.00
504-191-61200.000 Printing and Copying 450.07
504-191-61400.000 Office Supplies 38.05
504-191-63300.000 Financial Services 2,059.38
504-191-63800.000 Utility Bill Services 450.07
504-22210 Federal Withholding Tax… 1,787.58
504-22215 FICA Payable 3,440.42
504-22220 State Withholding Tax P… 784.41
504-22225 S.D.I. Payable 247.36
504-22420 S.E.I.U. Union Dues Paya… 237.43
504-22430 Deferred Comp Payable 218.51
504-340-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 84.12
504-340-64900.000 Other Utilities 38.00
504-340-66100.000 Gasoline & Oil 1,138.37
504-340-68700.000 Property Taxes 1,070.76
504-345-64100.000 Electricity 2,506.18
504-345-64500.000 Phone Charges 66.99
504-345-65200.000 Uniforms / Personnel Eq… 208.68
504-345-65700.000 Public Works Supplies 3,630.92
504-390-86206.000 GSA - GSP Implementati… 3,136.50
504-390-86210.000 Apple Avenue Consolidat… 2,655.00
Grand Total: 1,082,842.92
Project Account Summary
Project Account Key Payment Amount
**None** 1,082,842.92
Grand Total: 1,082,842.92
18 City Council Minutes
October 22, 2024
Page | 1

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 22, 2024

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor White called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Mayor White, Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez and Councilmember Ortiz ABSENT: Councilmember Martinez
STAFF: City Manager Wood, Chief Mixer, Community Development Director Mugan, Public Works Director Tugel, Captain Paredes, City Attorney Thompson, IT Director Espinosa, City Clerk Rathbun
GUESTS: Gail Stewart-White, Cynthia Zavala, Stephanie Garcia, Belen Garcia

EXCUSE COUNCILMEMBER ABSENCES
No motion made.

INVOCATION
Invocation by Pastor Ines Lugo.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
All recited the Pledge of Allegiance.

AGENDA REVIEW
No changes.

PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA Pastor Lugo, Greenfield Methodist Church, announced an event this Saturday that they, along with Senator Anna Caballero, some Supervisors and other community leaders from Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties, would be hosting with COPA. She stated she would like to invite everyone and hoped to see them at the event.

Gabby Serrato stated that Mayor White was non-responsive with her concern regarding Councilmember Martinez blocking her on Councilmember Martinez’s Facebook Council page. She stated that there was a lack of transparency because she had not received a response. She stated that she did not want to threaten the Council with legal action regarding the non-responsiveness. She also stated that she would like to know what kind of events were going on in the City and asked that they be announced so that everyone would know.

Laura Mireles asked for an update on the recreation center. 19 City Council Minutes
October 22, 2024
Page | 2

COMMENTS FROM CITY COUNCIL
Councilmember Ortiz stated that Councilmember Tipton had resigned and stated that it was very rare for a community to have a person such as him that was committed to the community. She stated that Mr.

Tipton had served on the Fire Board, Planning Commission and City Council and that the City was very lucky to have had Mr. Tipton’s service. She wished him well and hoped that he doesn’t detour from helping the community in the future.

Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez stated that she had heard nothing but good things about the Harvest Festival.

She stated that all the posts were amazing and congratulated everyone involved. She stated that she would like to have an update on the recreation center at the next City Council meeting as well as discussion regarding funding for ADA equipped parks. She addressed the comment regarding her attendance while on the Council. She stated that she had only missed 4 out of 48 meetings. She stated that the election was Tuesday and stated that it was very important to vote and be part of the process.

Mayor White announced that Jamba Juice was having its grand opening on October 24th and that the sugar skull and Halloween house decoration contests were going on. He thanked everyone involved with the Harvest Festival and stated that it was a lot of fun. He also announced the Day of Thanks on November 24th and that the Rotary was hosting a community yard sale on November 23rd. He reminded everyone to remember to vote.

CONSENT ITEMS
A MOTION by Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez, seconded by Councilmember Ortiz to approve the consent items including Warrants #322822 through #322935 and Bank Drafts #6262 through #6280 in the amount of $916,722.48, approve Minutes of the October 8, 2024 City Council Meeting, adopt Resolution #2024-128, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Cancelling the November 26, 2024 and the December 24, 2024 City Council Meetings due to the Thanksgiving and Christmas Holidays”, and receive and file the departmental reports – Finance Department and Fire Department. All in favor. Motion carried.

MAYOR’S PRESENTATION, PROCLAMATIONS, COMMUNICATIONS, RESOLUTIONS PRESENTATION – MONTEREY SALINAS TRANSIT – MICHELLE OVERMEYER, DIRECTOR OF

PLANNING & INNOVATION
Presentation was given by Michelle Overmeyer, Director of Planning & Innovation – Monterey Salinas Transit.

Mayor White asked that MST consider placing a stop near the Santa Lucia Shopping Center.

Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez asked about the gap in service. City Manager Wood stated that he had spoken with the MST CEO regarding the gap in service and they were trying to work out something.

Councilmember Ortiz stated that she was concerned about the gap in service because this would prevent people from making their medical appointments. Ms. Overmeyer stated that the RIDES program was a different program and was not affected by this.
20 City Council Minutes
October 22, 2024
Page | 3

CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS

ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD ACCEPTING THE AUDIT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HARSHWAL & COMPANY LLC IN THE AMOUNT OF $42,500 – FISCAL YEAR 2023; $44,400 – FISCAL YEAR 2024, AND $46,395 – FISCAL YEAR 2025 RESOLUTION #2024-129
Staff report was given by City Manager Wood
A MOTION by Councilmember Ortiz, seconded by Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez to adopt Resolution #2024-129, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Accepting the Audit Services Agreement with Harshwal & Company LLC in the Amount of $42,500 – Fiscal Year 2023; $44,400 – Fiscal Year 2024, and $46,395 – Fiscal Year 2025”. All in favor. Motion carried.

CONSIDERATION AND DISCUSSION OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PLANNING

COMMISSIONER COMPENSATION
Staff report was given by City Attorney Thompson.

Mayor White stated that he would like to keep the compensation as it was.

Councilmember Ortiz asked if it was the same compensation that was implemented in 2005. City Attorney Thompson stated yes. Councilmember Ortiz stated that the City had a strong Planning Commission and they did an excellent job. She stated that it was important to raise the compensation and would hope that the rest of the Council would raise it from $50 to $100.

Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez stated that she agreed with Mayor White and stated that she did recognize that the members of the Planning Commission were hard working and did a good job.

ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD ESTABLISHING

THE POSITION OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR, AMENDING THE ASSOCIATED SALARY SCHEDULE AND TO SUPPLEMENTALLY APPROPRIATE $12,300 TO FUND THE POSITION THROUGH THE REMAINDER OF FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025 RESOLUTION #2024-130
Staff report was given by City Manager Wood.

Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez asked what the increase would be. City Manager Wood stated that it would be a salary increase of approximately 7-8%. Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez stated that this was a lot for one person and asked if Mr. Mugan could take additional duties. City Manager Wood stated that Mr. Mugan was already performing these duties and stated that in future there probably would be a need for a senior planner and an administrative assistant.

A MOTION by Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez, seconded by Mayor White to adopt Resolution #2024-130, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Establishing the Position of Community and Economic Development Director, Amending the Associated Salary Schedule and to Supplementally Appropriate $12,300 to Fund the Position through the Remainder of Fiscal Year 2024-2025”. All in favor. Motion carried.

DISCUSSION OF CITY COUNCIL VACANCY
Staff report was given by City Attorney Thompson.
21 City Council Minutes
October 22, 2024
Page | 4
Beatriz Diaz stated that she agreed with the City Attorney and stated that all the seats would be filled after the election.

Mayor Pro-tem asked what was going to happen once the judge signed the writ that the appointment was not legal. She stated that the Council was going to have to re-do votes and there was going to be more to do. She stated that the Council would have to acknowledge that the person did not resign from the position; the appointment was illegal. She stated that language mattered and that Mr. Tipton did choose to resign on the day he resigned; however, that was not the reason why he wasn’t here moving forward.

City Attorney Thompson suggested that the Council wait for the writ so the City would know exactly what language was in it and then from there, Council might want to make a statement, as a body, stating what officially occurred. City Attorney Thompson also stated that as a legal standpoint the Council would have to do some ratification of votes at an upcoming meeting.

ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD 1) AWARDING A PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,034,166.00 TO ANDERSON PACIFIC ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR THE WALNUT AVENUE PEDESTRIAN AND

BIKEWAY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT BASE BID AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE THIS CONTRACT AND ASSIGN ADDITIONAL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS RESOLUTION; 2) APPROVE A CIP BUDGET TRANSFER OF $286,073.36 FROM THE 12TH STREET DRAINAGE AND PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT; AND 3) SUPPLEMENTALLY APPROPRIATE $73,094.64 TO THE CIP PROJECT FROM TRAFFIC

IMPACT FEES
RESOLUTION #2024-131
Staff report was given by Public Works Director Tugel.

Belen Garcia thanked the City Council for approving this contract.

A MOTION Councilmember Ortiz, seconded by Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez to adopt Resolution #2024- 131, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield 1) Awarding a Public Works Construction Contract in the Amount of $1,034,166.00 to Anderson Pacific Engineering Construction, Inc. for the Walnut Avenue Pedestrian and Bikeway Improvements Project Base Bid and Authorizing the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute this Contract and Assign Additional Work in Accordance with this Resolution; 2) Approve a CIP Budget Transfer of $286,073.36 from the 12th Street Drainage and Pedestrian Improvement Project; and 3) Supplementally Appropriate $73,094.64 to the CIP Project from Traffic Impact Fees”. All in favor. Motion carried.

CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
None.

CITY MANAGER REPORT
City Manager Wood reported on the League of California Cities Annual Conference. He stated that he attended some very interesting sessions, one on AI and another on transparency portals. 22 City Council Minutes
October 22, 2024
Page | 5

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor White adjourned the meeting in memory of Alexander Correa.

Meeting adjourned at 7:13 p.m.
_________________________
Mayor of the City of Greenfield
____________________________
City Clerk of the City of Greenfield
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 Date
No. of
Officers
on Duty
Incidents
Self-Initiated
Incidents -
Dispatched
Total
Incidents
Addressed
Abandoned
Vehicles
Inoperable or
Unregistered
Vehicle
Unpaved
Parking
Other
Parking
Vehicle
Code
Violations Animals
Kennel
Work -
clean,
feed,
exercise,
freezer
Take
animals to
shelter
Homeless
Enforcement
Welfare
Check
Property -
Unlawful
Accumulation
Community
Member
Information
Reports
Taken
Axon
Camera data
tagging Other Notes
10/1/2024 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
10/2/2024 3 13 1 16 - - - - 4 6 - - - - 3 - - - 3 2 Building Code violations, 1 evidence help (10 hrs) 10/3/2024 2 3 6 11 - - - - - 8 - - - - 1 - - - 2 GHS Homecoming Parade, GHS Homecoming Rally 10/4/2024 2 8 4 14 - - - - 4 6 3 - - - - - - - 1 Pilot Parking program flyers created, printed and cut 10/5/2024 2 2 - 2 - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - 1 Pilot Parking program flyer distribution (30 streets) 10/6/2024 1 10 6 18 2 4 - 1 8 - - - - - - 1 1 1 -
10/7/2024 2 17 1 25 1 2 1 10 2 - - - - - 3 1 1 4 2 Building code violations, AM & PM school patrol 10/8/2024 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
10/9/2024 4 10 1 17 5 - - - - 3 2 - 1 - - 1 1 1 3 Walk & Roll to School, AM & PM school patrol 10/10/2024 3 13 3 20 7 - - 2 1 4 - - - - 2 2 2 - -
10/11/2024 2 10 1 17 1 7 3 2 1 1 2 Trash recepticles location, GHS Career Fair 10/12/2024 2 4 7 17 - 4 4 3 3 1 2 Vendor permit violation, Patriot Park patrolling 10/13/2024 1 17 1 24 4 2 1 5 5 1 3 1 1 1 Patriot Park patrolling 10/14/2024 2 4 4 17 3 1 2 4 3 1 3 Assist with citizen flag down, AM & PM school patrol 10/15/2024 2 2 4 14 1 2 1 2 3 1 1 3 AM & PM school patrol, traffic control-YWCA walk 10/16/2024 4 6 - 15 2 1 1 3 2 1 5
Building inspections, multiple muni code and building violations, AM & PM school patrols, radar trailer move
10/17/2024 3 11 1 16 - 1 3 3 1 2 1 5
Homeless cleanup (5th St & Palm), Building code violation, prohibited signs, receptacles, Salinas radio drop-off, Animal Shelter quarterly stats 10/18/2024 2 11 2 16 4 1 5 3 1 2 Heltering services invoice prep, warrant translation 10/19/2024 4 1 - 4 - 1 1 1 1 Harvest Festival
10/20/2024 3 7 2 9 - 1 1 7 unlicensed food vendors
10/21/2024 2 2 3 9 - 1 4 1 1 1 1 vehicle pick-up - Paso Robles 10/22/2024 2 5 2 14 4 1 2 2 2 1 2 AM school patrol, assist officers in kcall 10/23/2024 3 9 4 18 3 2 4 3 3 1 1 1 Portable toilet violation 10/24/2024 3 17 2 24 9 3 1 3 2 3 2 1 Portable toilet violation 10/25/2024 2 2 5 12 1 1 5 2 1 1 1 Arroyo Seco Academy Career Day 10/26/2024 1 13 - 19 2 8 3 3 1 2 WMS Fun Run, Farmers' Market Close patrol 10/27/2024 1 5 - 4 1 3 Illegal vendors (coverage provided by Ray Najar, Police Volunteer) 10/28/2024 2 10 4 25 4 1 1 3 5 3 2 1 5 Trash recepticles location,AM & PM school patrol, (2) citizen flags down 10/29/2024 2 9 4 19 4 1 6 3 1 1 3 Trash recepticles location, AM & PM School Patrols 10/30/2024 3 10 1 11 4 2 1 4 Vendor permit violations
10/31/2024
Total 231 69 427 54 16 6 19 74 87 43 3 6 1 13 8 11 18 68 Avg. Daily 2.3 8.3 2.6 13.9 1.5 0.7 0.1 1.1 3.1 3.1 1.1 - 0.1 - 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 1.5 34 * * * * * * * P A R K I N G R E L A T E D * * * * * * * * A N I M A L R E L A T E D * * H O M E L E S S * P R O P E R T Y Month
Avg. No.
of Officers
on Duty
Incidents
Self-Initiated
Incidents -
Dispatched
Total
Incidents
Addressed
Abandoned
Vehicles
Inoperable or
Unregistered
Vehicle
Unpaved
Parking
Other
Parking
Vehicle Code
Violations Animals
Kennel
Work -
clean,
feed,
exercise,
freezer
Take
animals to
shelter
Homeless
Enforcement
Welfare
Check
Property -
Unlawful
Accumulation
Community
Member
Information
Reports
Taken
Axon
Camera
data
tagging Other
July 1.63 386 103 10 12 6 62 59 37 3 15 2 8 11 7 51
Aug 1.71 263 50 504 95 3 30 10 73 101 53 4 20 - 13 3 7 15 77 Sep 2.11 302 59 500 40 23 19 14 95 104 47 5 4 - 21 6 1 25 96 Oct 2.32 231 69 427 54 16 6 19 74 87 43 3 6 1 13 8 11 18 68 Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Total 1,817 292 52 67 49 304 351 180 15 45 3 55 28 26 58 292 Avg. Monthly 1.94 454.3 73.0 13.0 16.8 12.3 76.0 87.8 45.0 3.8 11.3 0.8 13.8 7.0 6.5 19.3 73.0 = no data
35 Monthly Report: October 2024
Program
Total Number of
Sessions Facilitated
Total Number of Recreation
Experiences Offered
Youth Fall
Softball
@Patriot Park
32 128
Morning/Evening
Zumba
@Community Center
28 420
Avatar Art Programs
@Cultural Arts Center
Fall Basketball Camp
@Memorial Hall 37 222
Senior Fitness & Arts
and Crafts
@Community Center
9 90
Video Game Club
@Community Center 10 50
Folklorico
@Cultural Arts Center
Ballet
@Cultural Arts Center
Total
COMMUNITY EVENTS FOR OCTOBER:

The Recreation Dept hosted a Family Movie Night on Friday October 18th at the Greenfield Memorial Hall! Showcasing Despicable Me 4.
16 16
240
240
37 148
185 1,538
36 37 kids
registered
2024 Youth Fall
Basketball Camp
37 Morning and EveningZumba
Serving an average of
15 adults persession
40 38
Video Game/
Homework
Club
Serving 10 kids
per session
39 Senior Bingo/arts
and Crafts
& Senior Fitness
Program
Serving an average of 10
seniorspersession
40 Avatar Arts Program
Serving a total of 37 kids
41 Youth Fall
Softball League
Serves 41 Kids
Games are played in Patriot Park.
42 Ballet Program
Serves up to 15 kids per program
43 Folklorico Dance Program
Serves up to 15 kids per program
44 October Special Events
Family Movie Night: Despicable Me 4
Over 80 People in attendance.
45 Greenfield Community Science Workshop: Monthly Report October 2024
Events:
4th Annual Halloween House Decorating Contest
The Greenfield Community Science Workshop held its 4th annual Halloween House Decorating Contest, attracting over 20 entries from the community. 4th Annual Día de los Muertos Sugar Skull Decorating Contest In celebration of Día de los Muertos, the Greenfield CSW hosted its 4th annual Sugar Skull Decorating Contest, with over 25 public entries.
4th Annual Halloween Pumpkin Carving Party
Greenfield CSW’s annual Pumpkin Carving Party welcomed kids and families to carve pumpkins for free. Pumpkins were donated by Braga Farms. The event saw over 120 participants.

Program
Total Number of Sessions
Facilitated
Total Number of Science
Experiences Offered
Drop-In - Tinker Time
Program 23 690
School Day Enrichment
Programs 63 1,764
After School Science,
Technology, and Engineering
Program 24 480
ScienceMobile: Ciencia en
Movimiento 42
840
Bike Education Lab 8
45 TOTAL 160 3,819
46 2024 Harvest Festival
Greenfield CSW provided two days of engaging and educational activities at the Harvest Festival, including:

1. A Recycling Game

2. Watershed Model Game

3. ScienceMobile with over 30 exhibits

4. Three different take-home projects
Kayaking & Pumpkin Patch Trip
Greenfield CSW organized a family trip to Elkhorn Slough for kayaking, followed by a visit to Borchard Farms’ pumpkin patch in Salinas, CA. The event drew over 30 participants.

Youth Biking Trip Along Monterey Bay
Greenfield CSW led a teen biking trip along the scenic Monterey Bay. A total of 7 teens joined the trip
Bike Repair Workshop in King City
The Greenfield CSW hosted a bike repair workshop at the Monterey District Ranger Station in King City, refurbishing and repairing over 37 bikes for community members.

Súper Wednesday
On Wednesday, October 16, Greenfield CSW hosted Súper Wednesday, offering slime-making, an interactive exhibit from the Pacific Grove Museum of Natural History, and free meals with the food bank. Over 200 attendees joined this vibrant event.

Other News and Developments:

N/A
47 1
Greenfield Fire Department
Activity Report
Prepared by Jim Langborg, Fire Chief
November 2024
2024 EMERGEY RESPONSE TYPE TO DATE (January through October) 48 2
2023 EMERGEY RESPONSE TYPE TOTAL
Back-to-Back Calls Defined as multiple calls occurring within 30 minutes of each other. 2024 Back-to-Back Calls 141 (January through October)
20 calls happened within five minutes of each other.
2023 Total Back-to-Back Calls 184
31 calls happened within five minutes of each other.
2022 Total Back-to-Back Calls 181
45 calls happened within five minutes of each other.
2021 Total Back-to-Back Calls 169
41 calls happened within five minutes of each other.
49 3
GFD Activity & Community Involvement
Deputy Chief Hiring Process – Three candidates have completed a ride along with the crews and met with the Fire Chief. All three candidates are potentially interested and appear to be qualified. An offer is being withheld at this point until some direction is provided how the Duty Chief On-Call requirements are being handled.

Harvest Festival – The FD participated in the Harvest Festival event by providing first aid station, an informational booth, and conducting food vender inspections prior to the start of the event. Over 27 vender inspections were completed, and multiple patient contacts were made.

Expanded Scope of Practice Training – The expanded scope of practice training was conducted, and all full-time personnel will be qualified to use advanced airway procedures in the coming months.

Trunk or Treat Event – A-shift participated in a trunk or treat event at Ceasar Chavez Academy on 10/30/24. Nearly 300 treats were distributed to local children.

Halloween At the Fire Station – Approximately 200 children visited the fire station on Halloween night.

Oak Avenue School Career Day – B-Shift participated in a career day event at Oak Avenue School on 11/06/24. Students were introduced to the fire service and were able to interact with firefighters.

All Hazard Emergency Action Plan – Captain Bryan Gage and Chief Langborg are working on an All-Hazards Emergency Action Plan that is scaled to the needs of the City of Greenfield. This plan identifies when the EOC is activated and how the city will operate during a disaster. More information will become available as this project progresses.
50 4
Grant Updates:

Seismic Retrofit Grant – We are still waiting to hear back from Congresswoman Lofgren’s Office about if we will be awarded any money for the seismic retrofit needed in our apparatus bay.

Reader Board Sign Grant – We are still waiting to hear back from FEMA on this prevention grant.

Fuels Management Grant – We have received preliminary notification that we have been awarded this grant. We are currently waiting for the grant acceptance paperwork to be sent, and we will bring it to the council for their acceptance.

Fire & Life Safety Inspections
A Business Inspection is an inspection that occurs in a local business. The intent of these inspections is to educate business owners on how to prevent a fire and familiarize response personnel with different buildings and occupancies.

A Mandatory Inspection is an inspection that is required to occur at least one time annually in all residential rental properties with three or more units, all educational facilities, all medical facilities, and all motels, hotels, and Boarding Facilities. 2023 Total Business Inspections – 93
2023 Mandatory Inspections – 60
2023 Total Inspections – 153
2024 Total Business Inspections To Date – 105
2024 Mandatory Inspections To Date – 53
2024 Total Inspections To Date – 158
51 A PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD PROCLAIMING NOVEMBER 2024 AS NATIONAL ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE AWARENESS MONTH WHEREAS, today there are over 7,000 plus residents of Monterey County that are living with Alzheimer’s, a figure that is expected to grow rapidly in the next year; and
WHEREAS, while today it is true that we have no cure for Alzheimer’s, that does not mean there is no treatment. With a good diet, physical activity, social interaction with love ones and caretakers, and certain drugs, many patients can have a good quality of life; and
WHEREAS, researchers are making great progress in developing ways to accurately diagnosed and treat Alzheimer’s disease, and with the help of Congress funding future research to find the treatment in the next 10 years; and WHEREAS, we need more individuals and families to know that they can get help at no cost from the Alzheimer’s Association and that there is hope, and Greenfield residents can visit alz.org to learn more about Alzheimer’s and become an advocate for the Alzheimer’s Association to help in the efforts to combat this disease.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that, I Robert White, Mayor of the City of Greenfield, do hereby Proclaim the month of November 2024 as:

NATIONAL ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE AWARENESS MONTH
_________________________
Robert White
Mayor of the City of Greenfield
52 MEMORANDUM: November 7, 2024
AGENDA DATE: November 12, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Transportation Agency of Monterey County (TAMC)
TITLE: PRESENTATION ON THE SALINAS VALLEY SAFE ROUTES TO

SCHOOL PLAN
BACKGROUND:

The Transportation Agency for Monterey County, Monterey County Health Department, Ecology Action, and the cities of Gonzales, Soledad, Greenfield, and King City have partnered to develop the Salinas Valley Safe Routes to School Plan ("Plan"). The three-year planning process identified barriers to safe access to 22 public schools in South Monterey County cities and recommended infrastructure and non-infrastructure improvements.

The Salinas Valley Safe Routes to Schools Plan identifies barriers to safe, convenient transportation and will guide future improvements around 22 public schools in five school districts. Recommendations included in the Plan are designed to help address school-based traffic congestion and improve student health by fostering increased biking, walking, and carpooling. The project team, comprised of staff from the Transportation Agency, County Health Department, Public Works staff from the four cities, School Districts, and non-profit Ecology Action, have engaged administrators, parents, and students in school bike/walk assessments, mapping activities, street demonstrations, and surveys.

The Salinas Valley Safe Routes to School Plan kicked off in spring 2022 with outreach in the City of Greenfield. The planning team conducted walking audits at each of the six public schools in Greenfield, gave 10 presentations at parent meetings, and received 540 responses to an online parent survey. In fall 2022, the planning team drafted and received community input on a list of infrastructure and non-infrastructure recommendations around the Greenfield schools.

Starting with Greenfield in fall 2022, the planning team planned and implemented four pilot projects, one in each city, to demonstrate some of the recommendations included in the plan and get community feedback. The Greenfield pilot project was held on 12th Street. The planning City Council Memorandum
599 El Camino Real Greenfield CA 93927 (831) 674-5591
www.ci.greenfield.ca.us
53 team also formed Steering Committees in each of the four cities. Steering Committees led a democratic process, called Participatory Budgeting, where community members vote to decide how public funds are spent. TAMC is providing up to $250,000 to each city to implement the highest voted projects.

REVIEW AND ANALYSIS
The project team is now seeking input on the Draft Salinas Valley Safe Routes to School Plan, including infrastructure recommendations to improve access to the six public schools in Greenfield. The Executive Summary is included as an attachment to this report, and the full Plan for Greenfield is linked below. The final Plan is anticipated to be adopted in January 2024. Once the Plan has been adopted, the Cities of Gonzales, Soledad, Greenfield, and King City and TAMC staff will pursue funding to implement recommendations in the Plan.

The Plan includes Citywide recommendations for bicycle and pedestrian corridor improvements, as well as recommendations around each school site and noninfrastructure recommendations for education and encouragement programs. All recommendations are planning-level and require further analysis prior to construction.

The projects in this plan will be implemented over time as funding becomes available.

With limited funding, the City of Greenfield must decide how to prioritize the recommendations. The Plan identifies a list of eight high-priority corridors that were evaluated based on common grant criteria. These corridors were scored to help City staff and decision-makers prioritize projects and identify the most competitive projects for various grant opportunities. Grant programs often prioritize large-scale, corridor-wide improvements, and future grant applications are likely to focus on improvements to one or more streets in Greenfield rather than individual projects.

Some projects that are low cost and have community support can be incorporated into the City’s maintenance programs and installed as part of ongoing road maintenance. City staff will review the Safe Routes to Schools Plan project list when planning maintenance projects to look for ways to incorporate bike and pedestrian improvements. This allows for a highly cost-effective strategy for implementing the projects included in this plan. For larger projects, leveraging local funds with additional grant funding will be critical. Having an approved Safe Routes to Schools Plan in place is a strategy to make Salinas Valley cities more competitive in future grant applications for construction funding.

FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:

AMC secured grant funding to develop the Plan through Caltrans’ Sustainable Transportation Planning grant program and provided Measure X Safe Routes to School Program matching funds.

Greenfield City staff have contributed staff time to develop the plan. 54 Attachments:

1. Salinas Valley Safe Routes to Schools Plan Executive Summary https://tamcmonterey.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/EZz_IJ2XE3NGq9Eyc3vCicMBobGlXaqNwB 6UbxffSq4DQA?e=pT9Pe3

2. Greenfield Safe Routes to Schools Plan.pdf
https://tamcmonterey.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/EbuaWeyXZoJNjbRAon_vIFgBP3Cfb1- oLdR_5i5_-5SzXg?e=pAqIfZ
RECOMMENDATION:

Receive a presentation on the Salinas Valley Safe Routes to Schools Plan and provide feedback.
55 Salinas Valley Safe Routes to Schools Plan
Executive Summary
The Salinas Valley Safe Routes to Schools Plan describes community-identified needs and recommendations for infrastructure projects and programs that support walking, bicycling, and carpooling to 22 schools in Gonzales, Soledad, Greenfield, and King City. The plan also identifies possible funding sources and implementation priorities. The recommendations in this plan are aimed at supporting healthy communities, improving affordable transportation options for low-income and vulnerable residents, and helping the four cities improve safety and meet statewide goals to address climate change by reducing vehicle miles traveled.

This plan was funded with a Sustainable Communities Transportation Planning Grant from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and local matching funds, and it is aligned with the regional and statewide plans and concepts included in the Caltrans District 5 Active Transportation Plan.

The vision for all students and families following the implementation of the Salinas Valley Safe Routes to Schools Plan is as follows:
• I can walk or bike to school safely.
• My trip to school helps our environment, builds healthy habits, and saves my family money. • I am more connected to my neighborhood and community through my trip to school. • I have the skills and confidence I need to travel to school safely without using a car.

Plan Contents
The introduction and outreach chapters include an overall introduction and a summary of outreach for the project. The remainder of the plan is divided into four sections, one for each of the four cities.

Chapter 1: Introduction. The first chapter describes the purpose of the plan, the benefits of walking and biking to school, and the plan’s relationship to other local planning efforts.

Chapter 2: Outreach. This chapter describes the outreach goals for the project and summarizes the various outreach methods used to involve community members in the planning process.

Chapter 3: Gonzales.
• 3A. Existing Conditions. This section describes the demographics and commute patterns of Gonzales residents, and existing bike, pedestrian, and transit facilities. It also includes an analysis of bicycle and pedestrian collisions and a description of the existing bicycle and pedestrian programs that are currently available to residents. • 3B. Outreach. This section describes the public outreach that took place in Gonzales, including community survey data from the temporary pilot project that was installed as part of the planning process.
• 3C. Recommendations. This section contains profiles of each of the three school sites, with information on the existing conditions at each school and infrastructure recommendations for DRAFT 56
making it easier and safer to walk and bike to school. It also includes a guide to the types of infrastructure that are recommended in this plan.
• 3D. Implementation, Reporting, and Maintenance. The final section discusses opportunities to fund and complete the recommended projects and programs and provides a list of high-priority corridors. It also includes a list of funding sources that can be used to finance these projects and programs, and the methods the City will use to maintain current and future pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure.

Chapter 4: Greenfield.
• 4A. Existing Conditions. This section describes the demographics and commute patterns of Greenfield residents, and existing bike, pedestrian, and transit facilities. It also includes an analysis of bicycle and pedestrian collisions and a description of the bicycle and pedestrian programs that are currently available to residents.
• 4B. Outreach. This section describes the public outreach that took place in Greenfield, including community survey data from the temporary pilot project that was installed as part of the planning process.
• 4C. Recommendations. This section contains profiles of each of the six school sites, with information on the existing conditions at each school and infrastructure recommendations for making it easier and safer to walk and bike to school. It also includes a guide to the types of infrastructure that are recommended in this plan.
• 4D. Implementation, Reporting, and Maintenance. The final section discusses opportunities to fund and construct the recommended projects and programs and provides a list of high-priority corridors. It also includes a list of funding sources that can be used to finance these projects and programs, and the methods the City will use to maintain current and future pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure.

Chapter 5: King City
• 5A. Existing Conditions. This section describes the demographics and commute patterns of King City residents, and existing bike, pedestrian, and transit facilities. It also includes an analysis of bicycle and pedestrian collisions and a description of the bicycle and pedestrian programs that are currently available to residents.
• 5B. Outreach. This section describes the public outreach that took place in King City, including community survey data from the temporary pilot project that was installed as part of the planning process.
• 5C. Recommendations. This section contains profiles of each of the five school sites, with information on the conditions at each school and infrastructure recommendations for making it easier and safer to walk and bike to school. It also includes a guide to the types of infrastructure that are recommended in this plan.
• 5D. Implementation, Reporting, and Maintenance. The final section discusses opportunities to fund and construct the recommended projects and programs and provides a list of high-priority corridors. It also includes a list of funding sources that can be used to finance these projects and programs, and the methods the City will use to maintain current and future pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure.

DRAFT 57
Chapter 6: Soledad
• 6A. Existing Conditions. This section describes the demographics and commute patterns of Soledad residents, and existing bike, pedestrian, and transit facilities. It also includes an analysis of bicycle and pedestrian collisions and a description of the bicycle and pedestrian programs that are currently available to residents.
• 6B. Outreach. This section describes the public outreach that took place in Soledad, including community survey data from the temporary pilot project that was installed as part of the planning process.
• 6C. Recommendations. This section contains profiles of each of the eight school sites, with information on the conditions at each school and infrastructure recommendations for making it easier and safer to walk and bike to school. It also includes a guide to the types of infrastructure that are recommended in this plan.
• 6D. Implementation, Reporting, and Maintenance. The final section discusses opportunities to fund and construct the recommended projects and programs and provides a list of high-priority corridors. It also includes a list of funding sources that can be used to finance these projects and programs, and the methods the City will use to maintain current and future pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure.

Appendices: The appendices include outreach materials, survey data from the parent survey and the temporary installations, the complete project list for all 22 schools, and public comments received for all school sites.

Goals and Objectives
The cities of Gonzales, Greenfield, King City, and Soledad and partner agencies have set the following goals and objectives for the future of Safe Routes to Schools, to be accomplished through the projects and programs in this plan.

Goal 1. Encouragement: The majority of children will arrive at school by foot, bicycle, scooter, skateboard, bus, or carpool.
• Objective 1.1: Identify and promote a broad spectrum of projects to provide a connected network of active transportation options along Safe Routes to Schools corridors and connections.
• Objective 1.2: Design and construct street improvements that are accessible and comfortable for all ages and abilities. Incorporate tree planting into active transportation projects to provide shade for people who are walking and bicycling.
• Objective 1.3: Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC), schools, and the cities will support events that encourage active transportation to school, such as “Walk & Roll to School,” at least twice a year.
• Objective 1.4: Work with schools and Safe Routes to Schools partners to provide walking school buses at all elementary schools.
• Objective 1.5: Work with schools and Safe Routes to Schools partners to promote Safe Routes to Schools corridors as the preferred routes to school.

DRAFT 58
Goal 2. Safety: Zero collisions involving bikes or pedestrians that result in injury or death. • Objective 2.1: Prioritize Safe Routes to Schools projects that address fatal and severe-injury crashes.
• Objective 2.2: Prioritize projects on school routes that reduce traffic speeds to 25 mph or less and increase the separations between pedestrians and bicyclists and motor vehicle traffic. • Objective 2.3: Enhance low-stress alternative routes to high-stress corridors. • Objective 2.4: Prioritize safety over travel speed, convenience, and congestion reduction in project design.
• Objective 2.5: Crossing guards will be present at all elementary schools. • Objective 2.6: Provide annual updates on safety projects and traffic collisions to governing bodies.

Goal 3. Education: All children in the Salinas Valley will receive traffic safety education. • Objective 3.1: Incorporate bicycle and pedestrian safety education into the curriculum in all elementary schools.
• Objective 3.2: By second grade, all children will receive pedestrian safety training in school; by fifth grade, all children will receive bike safety training in school. • Objective 3.3: By high school, students will know the basics of bike maintenance and have opportunities to practice these skills at school or in the community.

Goal 4. Engagement: Engage the greater community to create safe environments around schools.
• Objective 4.1: Run annual community-wide campaigns that encourage neighbors to keep eyes on the streets and drivers to slow down around schools. • Objective 4.2: Enforce traffic laws in school zones without overburdening offenders. An example would be a diversion program that requires school-zone traffic offenders to assist with crossing guard duties (Austin, TX program model).
• Objective 4.3: Recruit volunteers from the community to assist with Safe Routes to Schools programs such as walking school buses and crossing guards.

Goal 5. Equity: Ensure that all community members have equitable access to schools and Safe Routes to Schools programming.
• Objective 5.1: Prioritize infrastructure projects that serve transportation-disadvantaged and special-needs populations.
• Objective 5.2: Provide opportunities for a diverse group of community members to take leadership roles in the development and implementation of Safe Routes to Schools projects and programs. An example would be positions on a Safe Routes to Schools steering committee. • Objective 5.3: Provide access to active transportation and safety equipment such as bicycles, scooters, helmets, and lights.

DRAFT 59
Outreach Summary
Public input was the foundation of the Safe Routes to Schools Plan. The planning team developed an outreach plan and sought input from community members to understand school transportation needs and barriers and to refine their draft recommendations. Parent and student surveys, presentations at parent meetings, and walking audits with school staff all contributed to the team’s understanding of barriers to walking and biking to school in Salinas Valley cities and the types of improvements community members would like to see.

In addition, Steering Committees were formed in each of the four cities to lead a participatory budgeting process. This is a democratic process in which community members decide how to spend part of a public budget. The Steering Committees were made up of representatives from each city, including students, parents, school staff, advocates, and residents. Each Steering Committee met monthly for nine months to review project recommendations and design an election process for learning from the community about the highest priority projects in the Safe Routes to Schools Plan. TAMC allocated $250,000 per city to construct the highest-priority projects.
• Parent Outreach
o 42 presentations at virtual parent meetings
o 1,109 responses to online parent survey
o 26 responses to draft recommendations survey
o 15,000+ parents reached through Parentsquare or social media • Student Outreach
o 1,824 responses to student survey
• Temporary Installations
o 4 demonstration projects: on 12th Street in Greenfield, 5th Street in Gonzales, Front Street in Soledad, and Collins Street in King City
• Steering Committees
o 4 Steering Committees formed, in Gonzales, Soledad, Greenfield, and King City o 21 projects awarded funding through participatory budgeting process o $1 million in project funding awarded from TAMC
Project Prioritization
Key routes to school in each of the four cities were ranked to help decision makers and City staff prioritize projects and identify the most competitive projects for various grant funding opportunities.

Grant programs often prioritize larger-scale, corridor-wide improvements, and future grant applications will likely focus on improvements to one or more streets in each city.

The corridors below were evaluated on four criteria aligned with the vision and goals of this plan and with common grant criteria. Equity scores are based on two sources: free or reduced-price meal data, which is an indicator of family income, and the Healthy Places Index map, which shows data on health indicators such as education, job opportunities, and clean air and water. Each corridor was assigned a number from 0 to 100 based on the criteria in Table 1.

DRAFT 60
Table 1: Criteria for Project Prioritization
Criterion Description Max Points
Safety
The following points are awarded for bicycle and pedestrian collisions in the last 10 years within 150 ft of the project, for a maximum of 30 points:
• 5 points per fatal or severe-injury collision.
• 1 point per other visible injury or complaint-of-pain collision. 30 Access to Key
Destinations
10 points for every school within 500 ft of the corridor and 5 points for every park, library, and recreation center, for a max of 25 points. 25 Equity 20 points if the project is located within an area designated as disadvantaged. 20
CommunityIdentified Need
15 points if the project or location was identified by 10+ members of the community during project outreach.  25 10 points if the project or location was identified in one or more community planning documents.

TOTAL 100
Prioritized Corridor Lists
The tables below show the highest-priority corridors for Safe Routes to Schools improvements in each of the four cities.

Table 2: Prioritized Corridors, Gonzales
Street Cross Street 1 Cross Street 2 Score
5th Street Alta Street Fanoe Road 100
Elko Street 5th Street 1st Street 70
Center Street 10th Street A Street 60
7th Street /Cielo Vista Alta Street Del Monte Drive 45
Belden Street 10th Street C Street 40
Longhorn Drive Hereford Drive Devon Way 25
Table 3: Prioritized Corridors, Greenfield
Street Cross Street 1 Cross Street 2 Score
Apple Avenue 13thStreet 2nd Street 100
Oak Avenue 13thStreet 2ndStreet 100
Walnut Avenue 12th Street 2ndStreet 100
Elm Avenue 13th Street 3rd Street 95
El Camino Real Cherry Avenue Hwy 101 off-ramp 95
9th Street Elm Avenue Apple Avenue 55
12th Street Harvest Way Elm Avenue 50
7th Street/Moreno
Avenue Tyler Avenue End of street 40
DRAFT 61
Table 4: Prioritized Corridors, King City
Street Cross Street 1 Cross Street 2 Score
Broadway Street River Drive 1st Street 100
Mildred Avenue San Antonio Drive Broadway Street 95
San Antonio Drive Broadway Street Metz Road 80
Russ Street King Street Pearl Street 80
Pearl Street San Lorenzo Avenue 1st Street 60
King Street Sandringham Street Beech Street 60
Ellis Street Mildred Avenue 1st Street 55
Collins Street Mildred Avenue 3rd Street 55
Division Street Canal Street 1st Street 50
Table 5: Prioritized Corridors, Soledad
Street Cross Street 1 Cross Street 2 Score
Main Street Gabilan Drive Front Street 95
Orchard Lane/3rd
Street Palm Avenue Terraza Street 80
Gabilan Drive San Vicente Road Bryant Canyon Road 80
Metz Road East Street Tiburon Place 80
Market Street San Vicente Road Dixi Street 75
Monterey Street West Street 8th Street 70
West Street Front Street Cuesta Court 65
Front Street East Street Nestles Street 50
Participatory Budgeting Approved Projects
Participatory budgeting is a democratic process in which community members decide how to spend part of a public budget. TAMC allocated $250,000 per city to construct the highest-priority projects, and Steering Committees were formed in each of the four cities to lead a participatory budgeting process to determine the highest priority projects. The following projects were awarded funding through this process.

Table 6: Participatory Budgeting Funded Projects, Gonzales School Location Project Description
All 5th Street at Hwy
101 North Entrance
Study options to install roundabout, study quick-build curb extensions, and install high-visibility crosswalks and signage.

All 5th Street at Hwy
101 South Entrance
Study options to install roundabout, study quick-build curb extensions, and install high-visibility crosswalks and signage.

All 5th Street at Rincon
Road
Install curb extensions to move the existing crosswalk closer to the center line on 5th Street. Install high-visibility crosswalks on north DRAFT 62
and south legs of intersection. Relocate stop bar to prevent cars from encroaching on crosswalk.

Table 7: Participatory Budgeting Funded Projects, Greenfield School Location Project Description
Vista Verde Middle, Oak
Avenue Elementary
12th Street between Oak
and Elm Avenues
Install 0.24 miles of sidewalk, high-visibility
crosswalks, curb ramps, and flashing stop signs.

All schools Citywide Upgrade signs around all school campuses.

Arroyo Seco Academy 12th Street between
Cherry Avenue and
Harvest Way
Install 0.12 miles of sidewalk on 12th Street.

Vista Verde Middle,
Greenfield High
Heidi Drive Install high-visibility crosswalk and school crossing signage.

Table 8: Participatory Budgeting Funded Projects, King City School Location Project Description
Chalone Peaks
Middle
Intersection of San Antonio
Drive and Spreckels Road
Install stop bars and high-visibility crosswalks on each leg of intersection.

King City High Intersection of Canal Street
and Division Street
Install high-visibility crosswalks and ADA-compliant curb ramps on each corner of the intersection.

Del Rey
Elementary
Intersection of King Street
and Russ Street
Install high-visibility crosswalks and station a crossing guard at this intersection.

Del Rey
Elementary
Intersection of King Street
and 3rd Street
Install high-visibility crosswalks and ADA-compliant curb ramps on each corner of the intersection.

Santa Lucia
Elementary
Intersection of Russ Street
and Ulrey Street
Install high-visibility crosswalks on the south and east legs of the intersection, and install advance yield markings.

Santa Lucia
Elementary
Intersection of 3rdStreet
and Ulrey Street
Install high-visibility crosswalks on the north, south, and west legs of the intersection.

Santa Lucia
Elementary
Intersection of Collins
Street and Mildred Avenue
Install high-visibility crosswalks on the north and east legs of the intersection and ADA-compliant curb ramps on the northeast, northwest, and southeast corners.

Santa Lucia
Elementary
Intersection of Collins
Street and Patterson Street
Install high-visibility crosswalks on the north and south legs of the intersection.

All schools Ellis Street between
Mildred Ave and 2nd Street
Install high-visibility crosswalks on the north and south legs of each intersection.

All schools Intersection of Russ Street
and Bassett Street
Install high-visibility crosswalks on the east and west legs of intersection and ADA-compliant curb ramps on each
corner.

DRAFT 63
Table 9: Participatory Budgeting Funded Projects, Soledad School Location Project Description
Jack
Franscioni
Intersection of
Orchard Lane and
Gabilan Drive
Conduct a roundabout study. Station a second crossing guard at the intersection. Install ADA-compliant curb ramps on the northeast, northwest, and southwest corners, install stop bars and flashing stop signs on all legs, and install high-visibility crosswalk on the south leg of the intersection.

Pinnacles
High
Intersection of Main
Street and Gabilan
Drive
Conduct a roundabout study. Dedicate two parking spaces on Main Street to a white curb loading zone for school drop-off and pick-up. Install curb extensions on the southeast and southwest corners of the intersection, and station crossing guards at the intersection, ideally one at the east and one at the west crosswalk.

Soledad
High
Intersection of Benito
and Gabilan Street
Install stop bars on the south leg of the intersection, install ADAcompliant curb ramps on the southwest corner, and install schoolcrossing pavement markings approaching the midblock crosswalk.

San Vincente
Elementary
Orchard Lane, Metz
Road
Install high-visibility crosswalks across side streets at Aromas Place, Cadena Drive, and Cambria Drive. Remove the current loading zone on the north side of Metz Road between Almond Acres and the midblock crosswalk, and make this a red curb. Move the loading zone to be west of the school driveway, and formalize the dirt parking lot and stripe the parking spaces.

DRAFT 64
Greenfield Safe Routes to Schools Plan
Chapter 4A. Existing Conditions
This chapter discusses the current conditions in Greenfield related to walking, cycling, and transit use.

This includes citywide demographics and commute trends, land use and community destinations, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, transit options, collision data related to walking and cycling, bicycle and pedestrian projects that are currently in progress, and existing programs.

Demographics
Greenfield was home to an estimated 20,561 people in 2024.1 The city has a higher youth population than Monterey County as a whole, with 36% of residents being under the age of 18.2 Seniors represent a smaller proportion, with 6% of residents being over the age of 65.2 The median age is 27.3, which is lower than the median age for Monterey County as a whole.

Among Greenfield residents, 22.6% identify as white, 94% as Hispanic or Latino, and 1% as Asian. Fiftyfour percent of residents did not finish high school, and 21% completed high school as their highest level of education.One quarter of residents have at least some higher education, and 7% have either a bachelor’s or a graduate degree.2
Active transportation investments are especially important in underserved communities, which tend to have higher rates of walking and bicycling. According to the California Department of Education, 92% of students in Greenfield public schools qualify for free and reduced meals, which is a sign of low-income status.3 Sixty two percent of households have incomes of less than $50,000 per year, and 13% of families with children under the age of 18 have incomes below the poverty level.4 Commute Trends
An estimated 6,827 Greenfield residents over the age of 16 are employed, and 69% of those drive to work alone. Greenfield has a lower rate of driving to work alone than Monterey County as a whole.5

Overall, 13% of Greenfield residents carpool to work. Less than 1% walk, bike, or take public transit.

About 1% of residents work from home.5
Although some Greenfield commuters travel outside Monterey County for work, the vast majority (97%) stay within the county. The average commute time to places of employment is 22 minutes. 27% of commuters travel for more than 30 minutes daily, and 8% travel for 45 minutes or more.5

Although commute trips have the best available data on travel modes, they represent only a percentage 1 State of California Department of Finance, 2022. Source: https://dof.ca.gov/forecasting/demographics/estimates/e-4-population-estimatesfor-cities-counties-and-the-state-2021-2024-with-2020-census-benchmark/. 2 Census American Community Survey 2017–2021 Selected Characteristics of US Populations, Table SO601. 3 State of California Department of Education, 2021. https://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/ad/filessp.asp. 4 Census American Community Survey 2017–2021 Selected Economic Characteristics, Table DP03. 5 Census American Community Survey 2017–2021 Commuting Characteristics by Sex, Table SO801.

DRAFT 65
of trips. Comprehensive data on the percentage of Greenfield residents walking or bicycling for other daily trips are not available.

Figure 1. Work Commute Travel Modes in Greenfield
Source: U.S. Census Bureau.

Land Use and Major Destinations
Greenfield is bisected by Highway 101, with most of the city located on the west side of the highway.

Residential neighborhoods, one elementary school, and industrial areas are located to the east, and students from those neighborhoods must cross the highway to reach Vista Verde Middle School and Greenfield High. There are three bridges across Highway 101, at Walnut, Oak, and Elm Avenues.

Commercial areas are located primarily on the west side of the highway along El Camino Real and Walnut Avenue. Another key destination is Patriot Park, which includes the Greenfield Community Center and the Greenfield Library.

Existing Bicycle Network
There is currently one type of bicycle facility in Greenfield: class II bicycle lanes. Other streets have been designated as class III bicycle routes or regional routes. See below for definitions of each facility type.

Class II bicycle lanes are located on portions of streets, primarily where new development has occurred.

Sections of El Camino Real, Walnut Avenue, Oak Avenue, 13th Street, and 3rd Street have bicycle lanes.

Class III bicycle routes have been identified primarily for wayfinding purposes to guide people to preferred routes where there are no streets with bicycle lanes. Several streets near schools, including Walnut Avenue and Oak Avenue, have been identified as bicycle routes.

Class II Bicycle Lane
These are on-street facilities that use striping and stencils to designate spaces for bicycle travel. Bike lanes delineate the rights-of-way assigned to cyclists and motorists and provide for more predictable movements by each. In general, pavement markings alone do not measurably enhance cycling conditions.

DRAFT 66
Class III Bicycle Route
These are routes designated for bicycle and motor vehicle travel, with shared-use pavement markings.

Shared-lane markings help cyclists with lateral positioning to reduce their chances of hitting the open doors of parked vehicles, to alert other road users to the locations cyclists are likely to occupy in the roadway, and to encourage safe passing of cyclists by motorists. Shared-use markings are only feasible on streets with speed limits of 35 mph or less. Bike routes are identified with signage and shared-lane bicycle markings or “sharrows.”
Regional Bike Routes
The Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) developed a Pedestrian and Bicyclist Wayfinding Plan for Monterey County in 2016, in which it identified a network of regional bicycle routes.

Regional routes connect key destinations within the county and either currently have class I multi-use paths, class II bike lanes, or class III bike routes, or are planned to have bicycle facilities in the future.

DRAFT 67
Figure 2. Greenfield Bicycle Facilities
Existing Pedestrian Network
Greenfield has good sidewalk coverage in neighborhoods close to the city center, with sidewalk present on nearly all roadways. There is missing sidewalk on some roadways on the edge or outside of city limits, DRAFT 68
including portions of 13th Street and Elm Avenue between 12th Street and Gianolini Parkway. Some streets east of Highway 101 have intermittent sidewalk gaps, including Oak Avenue, Maple Avenue, and 3rd Street.

Curb ramps provide access between the sidewalk and the street for people with disabilities, children on bicycles, and people pushing strollers. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), upgraded curb ramps must include warnings that are detectable by people with vision impairments. As the City repaves streets and installs roadway improvements, upgraded curb ramps are installed at intersections to comply with ADA standards.

Existing Transit Network
Greenfield Unified School District provides busing for special education students and students who live outside the City of Greenfield. For the most part, bus transportation is not available for students living within the city, although Cesar Chavez Elementary does have bus service for students living west of Highway 101. The South Monterey County Joint Union High School District does not provide busing for Greenfield High students.

In addition to the transportation offered by school districts, Monterey-Salinas Transit (MST) offers bus transportation to the public. Youths aged 18 and younger receive discounted fares for all trips.

Active Transportation Safety
Bicycle- and pedestrian-related collision data can be used to identify high-level collision trends and locations with high rates of bicycle and pedestrian collisions. This analysis uses data from UC Berkeley’s Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) over the ten-year period from 1/1/2012 to 12/31/2021.

Note that the TIMS data include reported injury collisions only: many bicycle and pedestrian collisions are not reported and therefore are not represented in this analysis.

Greenfield has significant rates of collisions involving both bicyclists and pedestrians, with 30 pedestrian collisions and 18 bicyclist collisions between 2012 and 2021.6 In the 2017 California Office of Traffic Safety crash rankings report, Greenfield ranked worst for pedestrian collisions involving youths under 15, among cities of similar size.7 Greenfield also ranked in the top ten for total fatal and injury crashes in 2020, again in comparison to cities of a similar size.7 People walking and bicycling in Greenfield are disproportionately involved in collisions relative to people who are driving. TIMS data show that between 2012 and 2021, 20% of serious-injury and fatality collisions in Greenfield involved pedestrians and 12% involved bicyclists.8 This is disproportionate to walking and biking rates in the city; less than 1% of work trips are made by walking or bicycling.9 Bicycle Safety
Over the ten-year study period, there were 18 bicycle-related injury collisions in Greenfield, with an average of 1.8 collisions per year. There were no fatal bicycle collisions within the period. Two collisions 6 Safe Transportation Research and Education Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2023. 7 California Office of Traffic Safety, 2023.
8 Safe Transportation Research and Education Center, University of California, Berkeley, 2023. 9 Census American Community Survey 2017–2021 Commuting Characteristics by Sex, Table SO801.

DRAFT 69
caused severe injuries, 11 resulted in an “other visible injury,” and 5 resulted in a “complaint of pain.” Figure 3. Annual Bicycle Collisions
Bicycle Collision Trends
Bicycle-related collision locations are shown on Figure 4. Key takeaways from the analysis include the following:
• 11% of collisions resulting in severe injury in Greenfield involved people on bikes. Although bicycle trips make up only a small percentage of trips in Greenfield, bicyclists were disproportionally involved in severe-injury collisions. • Elm Ave was the location with the most bicycle-related collisions, with 33% of collisions taking place on this arterial street. Third Street, Eighth Street, Maple Avenue, and Oak Avenue were tied for second. Each of these corridors had 11% of the total bicycle collisions. • The majority of bicycle collisions (61%) took place at intersections. Twenty-eight percent of collisions took place at intersections on Elm Avenue.
• Youths aged 19 or younger were involved in 67% of bicycle collisions. Youths aged 14 or younger were the top age group for bicycle collisions and were involved in 56% of collisions.

Male cyclists were much more likely to be involved in collisions and made up 78% of crash victims.
• The most common bicycle collision factors, according to the reporting law enforcement officer, were driver’s failure to yield (22%) and riding on the wrong side of the road (11%).

Source: UC Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS).

DRAFT 70
Figure 4. Severity of Bicycle Collisions
Pedestrian Safety
Over the ten-year study period, there were 30 pedestrian collisions in Greenfield, with an average of three per year. There were no fatal pedestrian collisions in this period. Four collisions caused severe injuries, 12 resulted in some “other visible injury,” and 14 resulted in a “complaint of pain.” Figure 5. Annual Pedestrian Collisions
Fatal, 0%
Severe
Injury,
11%
Injury (Other
Visible), 61%
Injury
(Complaint of
Pain), 28%
Source: UC Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS).

Source: UC Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS).

DRAFT 71
Pedestrian Collision Trends
Pedestrian collision locations are shown in Figure 3. Key takeaways of the analysis include the following:
• 24% of severe injury collisions in Greenfield involved people walking. Although walking trips make up only a small percentage of all trips in Greenfield, pedestrians were disproportionally involved in severe-injury collisions.
• 70% of pedestrian collisions involved youths aged 19 or younger. Sixty-three percent of collisions involved youths under 14, with an even split between male and female pedestrians. • Oak Ave was the location with the most pedestrian collisions, 13%. Walnut Ave and El Camino Real were the second- and third-most common pedestrian collision locations. • The most common type of violation, according to the reporting law enforcement officer, was drivers’ failure to yield to pedestrians at marked or unmarked crosswalks, which accounted for 23% of collisions. The second most common violation was pedestrians’ failure to yield to vehicles when crossing outside of a marked or unmarked crosswalk, which accounted for 17% of collisions. • Drivers were at fault in 50% of pedestrian collisions. Pedestrians were at fault in 13%, and the fault was unknown in the remaining 36%.

Figure 6. Severity of Pedestrian Collisions
Current and Recently Completed Projects
The City of Greenfield has received SB1 funding annually from the state of California since 2017 and has consistently prioritized funding for projects to improve bicycle and pedestrian safety. Local development Fatal, 0%
Severe Injury,
13%
Injury (Other
Visible), 40%
Injury (Complaint
of Pain), 47%
Source: UC Berkeley Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS).

DRAFT 72
also provides opportunities to construct safety improvements. Several projects have been completed recently or are underway to provide new bicycle and pedestrian facilities in Greenfield. 12th Street Sidewalk
New sidewalk and an extension of the bike lane have been constructed as part of new development on the east side of 12th Street between the Magnolia Senior Apartments and Oak Avenue. In addition, sidewalks on the west side of 12th were identified as a top priority in Greenfield’s participatory budgeting process, and the Transportation Agency for Monterey County allocated $250,000 for projects that included sidewalk on the west side of 12th Street between Elm and Oak Avenues (see Chapter 3 for more information on participatory budgeting). Sidewalk on 12th Street is expected to be constructed by summer 2024.

Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Project
The City of Greenfield recently installed pedestrian-activated flashing beacons at six crosswalks, many of which serve students traveling to school: Oak Avenue at the post office, Apple Avenue at Thorp Avenue and Chardonnay Drive, and El Camino Real at three mid-block crosswalks between Apple and Maple Avenues.

Walnut Avenue Reconstruction
There are several projects to improve bicycle and pedestrian access on Walnut Avenue between El Camino Real and 3rd Street. Walnut is being widened between El Camino Real and Highway 101, and new bicycle route improvements will be installed. A new mid-block crosswalk with high-visibility markings, pedestrian-activated flashing beacons, and pedestrian median islands is planned for Walnut Avenue between Mary Chapa Academy and the Santa Lucia Shopping Center, which is a popular location for parents to park and walk to pick up students. The projects will also fill sidewalk gaps on both sides of Walnut Avenue between Mary Chapa and the highway and build new sidewalk on both sides of the street between the highway and 3rd Street.

Walnut Avenue Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements
Completion of missing sidewalk on the north side of Walnut between El Camino Real and 3rd Street will be constructed in the fall of 2024. This project is funded by SB 1 competitive grant funds and City street funds. Bike route signage, legends, and new striping and refreshed crosswalks will be installed on Walnut between 12th Street and 3rd Street.

Existing Programs
The City of Greenfield offers programs to support youths in repairing or building a bicycle. In addition, a variety of program offerings provide active-transportation education and encouragement to Greenfield residents. Some programs are focused on school-aged youths, but there are also programs offering safety information, encouragement, and events for the general public.

City Programs
Greenfield Science Workshop
The Greenfield Science Workshop offers hands-on science education, after-school programs, and field trips for youth in Greenfield. One option is for students to repair their bikes or scooters or even build one from scratch. Learn more here: https://ci.greenfield.ca.us/191/Greenfield-Science-Workshop.

DRAFT 73
Education and Encouragement Programs
Active Transportation Support Program
TAMC provides free racks for bicycle and skateboard parking, bike lockers, and bicycle repair stands to businesses, schools, and other organizations throughout Monterey County. The goal is to increase the amount of secure bicycle parking and ensure that it is distributed equitably throughout the county.

Interested parties can apply for funding to purchase a rack at any time here:
https://www.tamcmonterey.org/active-transportation-support-program.

Blue Zones Project Monterey County
Blue Zones Project is a national organization that works with communities to encourage changes that lead to healthier options for residents. Blue Zones works with governments, employers, restaurants, and school sites to encourage healthy eating, exercise, and community building. Blue Zones was launched in Monterey County in 2019 and works with schools in Greenfield to encourage healthy habits. Learn more here: https://info.bluezonesproject.com/montereycounty.

Go 831
Go831 is a free transportation-demand management program led by the Transportation Agency for Monterey County. The program is offered countywide and provides resources and incentives for commute trips made by biking, walking, carpooling, vanpooling, or public transit. Go831 also provides resources for employers who want to start incentive programs to reduce drive-alone commutes. Learn more here: http://www.go831.org/.

Measure X Safe Routes to Schools Program
Local sales tax Measure X, which was approved by Monterey County voters in 2016, includes $20 million for Safe Routes to Schools projects and programs through 2040. The Transportation Agency for Monterey County has developed a comprehensive Safe Routes to Schools program that offers tools, programming, and resources to schools, guardians, and communities with the aim of improving safety and traffic around schools. Learn more here: https://saferoutesmonterey.org/.

Modo Youth Programs
The Bike Safe and Walk Safe programs, led by Ecology Action, provide on-the-ground training in safe walking and bicycling to second- and fifth-grade students, with the goal of empowering students and parents to walk and bike and to reduce collisions. Learn DRAFT
more here: https://letsmodo.org/youth-safety/.
74 Greenfield Safe Routes to Schools Plan
Chapter 4B. Outreach
Greenfield Outreach Summary
• Parent Outreach
o 10 presentations at virtual or in-person parent meetings. o 540 responses to online parent survey.
o 26 responses to draft recommendations survey.
o 3400+ parents reached through ParentSquare or social media. • Pilot Projects
o 1 pilot project, on 12th Street.
o 146 responses to the 12th Street pilot project survey. • Steering Committee
o 40 Steering Committee members
o 8 Steering Committee meetings
o 244 community votes during participatory budgeting process o 4 projects approved for funding
Public Outreach Public input was the foundation of the Safe Routes to Schools Plan and began in the spring of 2022 in Greenfield. Outreach included presentations at virtual and in-person parent meetings, digital parent surveys, and tabling at community events. Walking audits were held at each school site to review infrastructure conditions and discuss safety issues with school staff. After draft recommendations were developed, the planning team hosted one temporary demonstration project in each city to test them and get feedback from the community. Finally, Steering Committees were developed in each city to lead a participatory budgeting process.

Greenfield is home to many Spanish-speaking residents, and enabling equitable participation was an important part of the outreach. All materials and surveys were developed in English and Spanish, and translation was available during walking audits. Parent presentations were given primarily in Spanish, and steering committee meetings were conducted in Spanish with English translation available.

Walking Audits
Walking audits were held at each of the six schools in Greenfield in spring 2022. Audits were held during school drop-off or pick-up to observe traffic and infrastructure conditions around the school and discuss key safety issues with school staff. School principals, community liaisons, parents, and crossing guards shared information on typical traffic patterns and safety issues for people walking and biking. These meetings were held outside, and COVID-19 protocols were maintained to ensure participants’ safety.

Parent Meetings
At the beginning of the planning process, the team contacted school staff to request time on the agendas of scheduled virtual and in-person parent meetings, such as coffee klatches, site councils, and DRAFT 75
the English Learner Advisory Committee (ELAC). During their presentations, team members shared information about the planning process and asked parents and school staff for input on any safety issues with biking and walking around the school. After the draft recommendations were developed, another round of presentations was conducted to get feedback. In total, ten presentations were given at the six Greenfield schools.

Parent and Student Surveys
An initial survey was shared with parents through school communication channels, the project website, and on social media, and received 540 responses. The survey asked about how students typically traveled to school before COVID-19, top concerns about letting students walk or bike to school, and current barriers to traveling to school safely. After the draft recommendation list was developed, recommendations maps in English and Spanish were shared with parents along with a short survey asking for their feedback. Twenty-six responses were received with feedback.

Pilot Projects
After the draft recommendations were developed, the planning team selected one location per city for a temporary pilot project. These projects were designed to test the draft recommendations, see how their designs worked in practice, and get feedback from the community on whether they should be made permanent. See below for more information on the Greenfield pilot project and community survey data.

Steering Committees
Safe Routes to School Steering Committees were formed in each of the four cities. These Committees were made up of community representatives, including students, parents, school staff, advocates, and residents. They met monthly for up to nine months and took active leadership in engaging the community and developing projects.

Each Steering Committee led a participatory budgeting process through which community members decided democratically how to spend part of their public budget. The Transportation Agency for Monterey County allocated $250,000 per city to implement projects from the Safe Routes to Schools Plan, and steering committees developed a process for community members to vote on which projects should be funded.

The Committee developed project proposals based on the recommendations in the Safe Routes to Schools Plan and designed a process for residents to vote on the projects that were most important to them. The projects that received the most votes were recommended for funding, and Steering Committee members presented the results to the Greenfield City Council for approval. Projects funded through participatory budgeting will begin implementation as soon as the Greenfield City Council the TAMC’s board of directors approve the Steering Committee’s recommendations. The city of Greenfield will construct as many recommendations as is feasible given current construction costs. The projects recommended for funding in Greenfield are listed in Chapter 4D.

Many Committee members came from communities that are traditionally underrepresented in the political process, and whose members face obstacles to participating or feel left out. By serving on Safe Routes to Schools Steering Committees, these members gained experience in leadership and participation in local government. Steering Committees also improved connections between the planning team and each community and increased public participation in the planning. Committee DRAFT 76
members were compensated for their time to recognize the value of their work and allow for equitable participation.
12th Street Pilot Project Survey Results
Highlights of the community survey data for the 12th Street pilot project are provided below. The full survey data can be found in the Appendix.

The temporary installation was located on 12th Street between Elm Avenue and Apple Avenue. This section of 12th Street connects nearby residents with Arroyo Seco Academy, Oak Ave Elementary, and Vista Verde Middle School. 12th Street was selected for the pilot project because it connected the three schools, and because it was the street that received the most comments from community members during initial outreach. 12th Street was also identified as a priority by the steering committee.

At the time of the installation, there were no bicycle facilities along this section of 12th Street. The speed limit was 25 mph, but public comments indicated that people frequently drove faster. The pilot project included curb extensions and high-visibility crosswalks at the intersections of Apple Avenue, Oak Avenue and Elm Avenue.

The 12th Street pilot project was in place for one month. The planning team received 146 community survey responses during this time. The following methods were used to promote the project and collect survey responses:
• Distribution of fliers and a survey link to parents, through all Greenfield schools. • Distribution of fliers and a survey link, through city (parks and recreation) outlets. • Door-to-door distribution of fliers with the survey link to neighbors along 12th Street. • Mass mailings to nearly 2,200 households in the neighborhoods around the pilot project. • Social media posts.
• Banners and pre-stamped surveys placed along 12th Street. • Presentation to City Council before the pilot was installed.

Survey Results
• 48% of survey respondents walked on 12th Street during the pilot project, and 47% drove down 12th Street. Five percent of respondents bicycled through the pilot. • 80% of respondents reported having a positive experience with the high-visibility crosswalks, and 70% had a positive experience with the curb extensions. • 35% of respondents said that they walked or biked more because of the temporary installation. • 70% indicated that they would like to see the temporary changes made permanent. • 83% said that they would either definitely or probably use the new facility if it became permanent.

DRAFT 77
Figure 7. 12th Street Pilot Project Survey Data
Figure 8. 12th Street Pilot Project Survey Data
Next Steps
One of the projects selected for funding through the participatory budgeting process in Greenfield was the installation of new sidewalks on 12th Street between Oak and Elm Avenues, along with new highvisibility crosswalks, curb ramps, and flashing stop signs at intersections. These projects are funded by TAMC and will begin implementation in 2024.
70%
14%
7% 9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Yes Maybe - with some
changes
Undecided No
Would you like to see the temporary improvements
made permanent?
50%
33%
5%
12%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Definitely Likely Not at all likely Not likely
How likely would you be to walk or bike through this
area if the changes became permanent?
DRAFT 78
Greenfield Safe Routes to Schools Plan
Chapter 4C. Recommendations
The infrastructure and program recommendations listed in this chapter are the core of the Safe Routes to Schools Plan. They were designed to address the specific challenges at each school site, with the goal of encouraging more active transportation trips to school. This chapter contains information on the current conditions at each school, observations from the walking audit, and the list of infrastructure recommendations. Schools are organized alphabetically. School-specific non-infrastructure recommendations are also listed under each school’s profile. Citywide non-infrastructure recommendations are listed at the end of this chapter.

A guide to the various types of infrastructure treatments mentioned in this chapter starts on page xx.

Safe Routes to Schools Corridors
Safe Routes to Schools corridors are streets that have been identified as key routes to Greenfield schools. These streets may be good candidates for corridor-level improvements to slow traffic speeds, improve intersections and crossings, and create a safe and comfortable environment for students to walk and bike to school.

DRAFT 79
Figure 9. Map of Greenfield Safe Routes to Schools Corridors DRAFT 80
Recommendations Process
The recommendations in this Safe Routes to Schools Plan were developed in response to public input on the barriers to getting to each school site safely. Public comments from parent surveys, parent meetings, and walking audits were reviewed, and where feasible, recommendations were developed to address each issue. This process included the evaluation of current conditions around each school.

After the draft recommendations were developed, recommendation maps in English and Spanish were shared with each school along with a short survey asking for feedback. Each school was also offered another round of bilingual parent presentations to share the draft recommendations and collect feedback from parents and staff. The planning team reviewed this feedback and adjusted the recommendations where feasible.

All recommendations are planning-level and require further analysis before construction. All recommendations for new marked traffic-control devices, including crosswalks, require further analysis and must meet the guidelines of the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices to be installed.

Guide to Bicycle & Pedestrian Infrastructure Recommendations [ • Bicycle Boulevards are streets with low traffic volumes and speeds where full bike lanes are not feasible and cyclists share the road with motor vehicles. Bike boulevards are usually marked by signs and shared- use pavement markings, or “sharrows,”, and include traffic calming measures like diverters, medians, chicanes, or traffic circles.
• Class I shared use paths are paved rights-of-way, completely separated from streets, which support multi-use recreation and transportation opportunities for walkers, bicyclists, skaters, and wheelchair users.
• Class II bike lanes are unprotected on-street bicycle facilities that use striping and stencils to designate spaces for bicycle travel.
• Class IIB buffered bike lanes are separated from vehicle lanes by a striped buffer, which provides greater separation and comfort for cyclists.
• Class III bicycle routes are designated for bicycle travel with signage and shared- use pavement markings, or “sharrows,”, and are shared with motor vehicles. • Curb extensions are additions to the sidewalk at intersections or mid-block crosswalks to shorten pedestrians’ crossing distance and make them more visible to drivers. • Flashing stop signs are stop signs with flashing lights on them to increase visibility. • High-visibility crosswalks are “ladder style” crosswalks that are more visible to drivers than crosswalks consisting of two lines.
• Leading pedestrian intervals allow pedestrians to cross an intersection a few seconds before cars are given a green light, making them more visible to drivers who are making left turns. • Neighborhood traffic circles are small roundabouts installed on neighborhood streets to slow traffic and create a safer and more comfortable environment for people walking and biking. • Pedestrian refuge islands are protected spaces in the center of a crosswalk that reduce crossing distance and pedestrians’ exposure to vehicle traffic.
• Raised medians provide mid-street spaces to install pedestrian safety features, traffic control devices, amenities, and landscaping, and can also provide traffic calming.

DRAFT 81
• Rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs) are used at uncontrolled intersections or mid-block crosswalks to alert drivers to people waiting to cross the street. • Roundabouts are circular intersections where drivers travel counterclockwise around a center island. They have been shown to reduce crashes and improve safety for pedestrians. • Traffic calming uses various measures such as speed humps, traffic circles, and chicanes to slow vehicle traffic on residential streets and improve safety and conditions for walkers and cyclists.

These measures must be requested and supported by neighborhood residents to be installed.

Citywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Network Recommendations Figure 10 shows existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities along with recommendations for bicycle and pedestrian corridor improvements throughout Greenfield. A description of each facility type can be found above.

DRAFT 82
Figure 10. Greenfield Bicycle & Pedestrian Network Recommendations DRAFT 83
Arroyo Seco
Arroyo Seco Academy is located on the western edge of Greenfield adjacent to undeveloped land, and it draws students primarily from the surrounding neighborhoods (see Figure 11).

Grade
levels
Number of
students
Students qualifying for
free or reduced meals
Students residing
within 1 mile of school
Students using active
transportation (based on
40 survey responses)
K–6 633 86.1% 100% 46%
Figure 11. Map of Arroyo Seco Academy Area.

Parent Survey
Arroyo Seco Academy parents were asked to complete a bilingual survey about their attitudes toward walking and biking to school in the spring of 2022, and 40 surveys were received back. The full survey report is in the Appendix.

The survey asked parents to select the most important factors in their decisions whether to allow their children to walk or bike to school. The top issues for parents are listed in Figure 12.

DRAFT 84
Figure 12. Parents’ Concerns about Children Walking or Biking to School (respondents could select more than one)
Top Concerns
Arroyo Seco
Academy
Safety of intersections and
crossings 47%
Distance 44%
Speed of traffic along route 33%
Amount of traffic along route 33%
Sidewalks or pathways 30%
Current Infrastructure Conditions
Motorist Conditions
o Arroyo Seco Academy has a drop-off loop and a parking lot off Apple Avenue. Parking spaces in the lot are reserved for staff and visitors.
o At the time of the audit, drop-off took place in the loop and on the street. As a result, there was some minimal congestion before and after school.
o School bus drop-off takes place on the loop within the school parking lot, separate from the student drop-off loop.

Pedestrian Conditions
o There is missing sidewalk on the north side of Apple Avenue west of the school. o The intersection of Apple Avenue and 12th Street is a four-way stop with standard striped crosswalks.
o There is one marked crosswalk across Apple Avenue near the school frontage. o There were two crossing guards present at the time of audit. One was positioned at the crosswalk in front of the school and the other at the intersection of 12th Street and Apple Ave.

Bicycling Conditions
o There is a short segment of Class II bike lane on 12th Street between Apple Avenue and just south of Hicks Drive. There are no bicycle facilities on Apple Avenue or other nearby neighborhood streets.

DRAFT 85
Recommended Infrastructure Improvements around Arroyo Seco Academy Table 1 lists recommendations for Arroyo Seco Academy, and the map below (Fig. 13) shows their locations in relation to the school.

Table 1. Recommendations for Arroyo Seco
ID
Code Street
Cross
Street 1
Cross
Street 2 Issue Recommendation
GA01 12th
Street
Cherry
Avenue
Walnut
Avenue
Missing sidewalk. Install sidewalk.

GA02 13th
Street
Oak
Avenue
Apple
Avenue
Sidewalk gaps, students
walking in street.

Install sidewalk to fill gaps
on south side.

GA03 Apple
Avenue
12th Street High volumes of
pedestrians and vehicles,
low pedestrian visibility at
intersection.

Install high-visibility
crosswalks (all legs).

GA04 Apple
Avenue
12th Street High volumes of
pedestrians and vehicles.

Install curb extensions (all
corners).

GA05 Apple
Avenue
12th Street High volumes of
pedestrians and vehicles,
students crossing in all
directions at once.

Recruit additional crossing
guard for this intersection.

GA06 Apple
Avenue
12th Street Missing signage. Reports of
drivers not yielding to
pedestrians in the
crosswalk.

Install “School ahead” or
“School crossing” signage.

GA07 Apple
Avenue
13th Street Reports of drivers
speeding.

Install or update “School
ahead” signage.

GA08 Apple
Avenue
Hutchinson
Drive
Key route to school, no
bicycle facilities.

Install mini traffic circle or
curb extensions as part of
bike boulevard project.

GA09 Apple
Avenue
Morris
Way
School signage missing. Install or update “School
crossing” signage.

GA10 Apple
Avenue
School
driveway
12th Street Sidewalk gets crowded
with people walking.

Drivers cross the sidewalk
to park in the empty lot.

Widen path to create
multi-use path on west
side.

GA11 Apple
Avenue
School
driveway
13th Street Sidewalk gaps on south
side.

Install sidewalk to fill gaps
on south side.

GA12 Apple
Avenue
School
driveway
Highway
101
No bicycle facilities. Install bicycle boulevard
with traffic calming,
sharrows, and signage.

GA13 Apple
Avenue
School
driveway
exit at
School signage missing. Install or update “School
crossing” signage.

DRAFT 86
midblock
crosswalk
GA14 General Some students are walking
before and after crossing
guard shifts.

Extend crossing guard
schedules earlier and later.

GA15 Hicks
Drive
12th Street Key pedestrian route to
school. Curb ramps are not
currently ADA accessible.

Install ADA-compliant curb
ramps (all corners).

GA16 Hicks
Drive
12th Street Key pedestrian route to
school, no marked
crosswalks.

Install high-visibility
crosswalks across Hicks
Drive (east and west
sides).

GXA Citywide Need to update school
signage.

Upgrade signs around
school campus.

GV19 General Start and end times are
similar between schools,
which creates more traffic
before and after school.

Stagger start and end
times of Arroyo Seco, Oak
Avenue School, Vista
Verde, and Greenfield HS.

DRAFT 87
Figure 13. Arroyo Seco Academy Recommendations
DRAFT 88
Cesar Chavez Elementary
Cesar Chavez Elementary is the only school in Greenfield located east of Highway 101. It draws students primarily from the surrounding neighborhoods and the neighborhood south of Elm Avenue (see Figure 14).

Grade
levels
Number of
students
Students qualifying for
free or reduced meals
Students residing
within 1 mile of school
Students using active
transportation (based on
79 survey responses)
K–6 640 76.7% 100% 48%
Figure 14. Map of Cesar Chavez Elementary School Area
Parent Survey
Cesar Chavez Elementary School parents were asked to complete a bilingual survey about their attitudes toward walking and biking to school in the spring of 2022, and 79 surveys were received back. The full survey report is in Appendix X.

The survey asked parents to select the most important factors in their decisions whether to allow their DRAFT 89
children to walk or bike to school. The top issues for parents are listed in Figure 15.

Figure 15. Parents’ Concerns about Children Walking or Biking to School (respondents could select more than one)
Top Concerns
Cesar Chavez
Elementary
Amount of traffic along route 30%
Safety of intersections and
crossings 28%
Speed of traffic along route 28%
Distance 22%
My child already walks or bikes
to/from school 20%
Current Infrastructure Conditions
Motorist Conditions
o Cesar Chavez Elementary School had a drop-off loop and a parking lot off Apple Avenue. Parking spaces in the lot are reserved for staff and visitors.
o Drop-off takes place in the drop-off loop next to the parking lot. Some congestion can be seen on Apple Avenue, especially close to the first bell ringing. o School bus drop-off takes place on Thorpe Avenue in a dedicated bus loop.

Pedestrian Conditions
o There are complete sidewalks on both sides of Apple Avenue, except for a gap at the corner of Apple Avenue and 3rd Street.
o There are marked crosswalks across Apple Avenue at 3rd Street, Chardonnay Drive, and Thorpe Avenue. There are curb extensions at the intersection of Apple Avenue and Thorp Avenue. o There were no crossing guards at any of the nearby crossings at the time of audit.

Bicycling Conditions
o There are class IIB buffered bike lanes on both sides of Apple Avenue between Thorp Avenue and 3rd Street. There are no bicycle facilities on other nearby neighborhood streets.

DRAFT 90
Recommended Infrastructure Improvements around Cesar Chavez Elementary Table 2 lists recommendations for Cesar Chavez Elementary, and the map below (Figure 16) shows their locations in relation to the school.

Table 2. Recommendations for Cesar Chavez Elementary
ID
Code Street
Cross
Street 1
Cross
Street 2 Issue Recommendation
GC01 3rd Street Oak Avenue Missing
sidewalk.

Install sidewalk on
southwest and southeast
corners to connect to
existing sidewalk on either
side of each corner
GC02 3rd Street Oak Avenue Key pedestrian
route to school.

Missing curb
ramps.

Install ADA-compliant curb
ramps (all).

GC03 3rd Street Oak Avenue Low pedestrian
visibility at
intersection.

Install high-visibility
crosswalks on all legs.

GC04 3rd Street Palm
Avenue
Existing
sidewalk ends in
driveway.

Remove crosswalk once
crosswalk improvements
are installed at Oak Avenue
and 3rd St.

GC05 3rd Street Walnut
Avenue
Apple
Avenue
Missing
sidewalk.

Install sidewalk or
decomposed granite (DG)
path on south side of street.

GC06 Apple
Avenue
3rd Street High volumes of
pedestrians and
vehicles.

Install curb extensions on
southeast and southwest
corners..

GC07 Apple
Avenue
3rd Street Chardonnay
Drive
Missing
sidewalk.

Install sidewalk on the north
side of intersection .

GC08 Apple
Avenue
Chardonnay
Drive/
Cordona
Circle
Need to update
school signage.

Install or update “School
ahead”/“School crossing”
signage.

GC09 Apple
Avenue
Driveway
exit
Drivers turning
left back up
traffic in school
loop.

Paint arrows at driveway to
indicate no left turn.

GC10 Apple
Avenue
Thorp
Avenue
Need to update
school signage.

Install or update “School
ahead”/“School crossing”
signage.

GC11 Burgundy
Drive
Apple
Avenue
Some families
crossing at
Burgandy Drive,
Install signage on N side of
Apple Avenue directing
pedestrians to cross at
DRAFT 91
no marked
crosswalk.

Cardona Circle/Chardonnay
Drive.

GC12 Burgundy
Drive
Apple
Avenue
Need to update
school signage.

Install “School crossing”
signage across Burgundy
Drive.

GC13 Oak
Avenue
US-101 N Low pedestrian
visibility at
intersection.

Install high-visibility
crosswalk on north side of
intersection.

GC14 Oak
Avenue
US-101 S Low pedestrian
visibility at
intersection.

Install high-visibility
crosswalk on north side of
intersection.(
GC15 School
loop
Apple
Avenue
Traffic
congestion
during drop-off
and pick-up.

Implement student valet
program at curb and in
parking lot. Could recruit
older students or parent
volunteers.

GC16 Thorp
Avenue
Bianco Way No marked
crosswalk across
Thorp between
Walnut and
Apple. Reports
of speeding.

Install high-visibility
crosswalks across both
streets.

GC17 Thorp
Avenue
Bianco Way Reports of
speeding on
Thorp.

Install curb extension on
northwest corner.

GC18 Thorp
Avenue
Bianco Way No marked
crosswalk across
Thorp between
Walnut and
Apple. Reports
of speeding.

Install “School crossing”
signage.

GC19 Thorp
Avenue
Driveway
entrance
Missing curb
ramp.

Install curb ramp on south
side intersection
GC20 Thorp
Avenue
Driveway
exit
Missing curb
ramps.

Install curb ramps on north
and south sides of
intersection .

GC21 Thorp
Avenue
Near Barolo
Circle
Reports of
speeding.

Install “School ahead” or
“School zone” signage.

GC22 Walnut
Avenue
Plaza 3rd Street Missing
sidewalk.

Install sidewalk or DG path
on south side of street.

GC23 Walnut
Avenue
US-101 Plaza Missing
sidewalk.

Install sidewalk on south
side.

GXA Citywide Need to update
school signage.

Upgrade signs around
school campus.

DRAFT 92
GXB Elm
Avenue
US-101 No bicycle
facilities.

Widen bridge across US-101
to include wider sidewalk
and bicycle facilities.

Figure 16. Cesar Chavez Elementary Recommendations
DRAFT 93
Greenfield High
Greenfield High School is located on the southern edge of Greenfield, and it draws students from the entire city, being the only available high school in Greenfield (see Figure 17).

Grade
levels
Number of
students
Students qualifying for
free or reduced meals
Students residing
within 1 mile of school
Students using active
transportation (based on
161 survey responses)
9–12 1339 86.7% 67% 48%
Figure 17. Map of Greenfield High School Area
Parent Survey
Greenfield High parents were asked to complete a bilingual survey about their attitudes toward walking and biking to school in spring 2022, and 161 responses were received. The full survey report is in the Appendix.

The survey asked parents to select the most important factors in their decisions whether to allow their children to walk or bike to school. The top issues for parents are listed in Figure 18, below.

DRAFT 94
Figure 18. Parents’ Concerns about Children Walking or Biking to School (respondents could select more than one)
Top Concerns
Greenfield
High
Distance 42%
Time 40%
Amount of traffic along route 22%
Child’s before or after-school
activities 16%
Convenience of driving 15%
Current Infrastructure Conditions
Motorist Conditions
o Greenfield High School has a large drop-off loop and a parking lot off El Camino Real. Spaces in this lot are for staff and visitors. There is a second parking lot on the north side of campus which is reserved for student and staff parking.
o There was some traffic congestion on El Camino Real during the audit, primarily among drivers going south from Tyler Avenue toward the drop-off loop. o School bus drop-off takes place on a designated bus loop on the north side of campus. o Student drop-off occurs on-street, along both sides of El Camino Real, Tyler Avenue, and Street.

Mathews Street, and at the Village Green Park.

Pedestrian Conditions
o There is complete sidewalk on the south side of El Camino Real between Elm Avenue and the end of the school campus. There is missing sidewalk on El Camino Real across the street from the school.
o The intersection of El Camino Real and Tyler Avenue is signalized and has high-visibility yellow crosswalks.
o The intersection of El Camino Real and the 101 on-ramp (at the school driveway exit) is stop controlled and does not have marked crosswalks.
o At the time of the audit, school staff were controlling traffic in the drop-off loop and acting as crossing guards at the crosswalk in the school loop.

Bicycling Conditions
o There are class II bike lanes on both sides of El Camino Real, but the striping is faded in some locations. There are no bicycle facilities on other neighborhood streets.

DRAFT 95
Recommended Infrastructure Improvements around Greenfield High School Table 3 lists recommendations for Greenfield High School, and the map below (Figure 19) shows their locations in relation to the school.

Table 3. Recommendations for Greenfield High
ID
Code Street
Cross
Street 1
Cross
Street 2 Issue Recommendation
GG01 Elm
Avenue,
bridge
across US101
4th Street
/ 5th
Street
Low visibility for
students walking after
dark.

Install pedestrianscale lighting along
the bridge.

GG02 7th Street Maple
Avenue
Goal is to improve the
7th/Moreno corridor to
create a safe route to
Greenfield High and
Mary Chapa.

Consider a mini
traffic circle.

GG03 7th Street Oak
Avenue
Goal is to improve the
7th/ Moreno corridor to
create a safe route to
Greenfield High and
Mary Chapa.

Install high-visibility
crosswalks on all
sides of intersection,
curb ramps, and
“School crossing”
signage. Consider
curb extensions.

GG04 7th
Street/
Moreno
Street
Mary
Chapa
campus
Tyler
Avenue
Reports of speeding on
Moreno Street. Goal is
to improve the 7th
Street/
Moreno Street corridor
to create a safe route to
Greenfield High and
Mary Chapa.

Install bicycle
boulevard, including
sharrows, signage,
and traffic-calming
measures.

GG05 9th Street Apple
Avenue
Elm
Avenue
Goal is to improve the
9th Street corridor to
create a safe route to
Greenfield High and
other schools.

Install bicycle
boulevard, including
sharrows, signage,
and traffic-calming
measures.

GG06 9th Street Apple
Avenue
Goal is to improve the
9th Street corridor to
create a safe route to
Greenfield High and
other schools.

Install high-visibility
crosswalk on south
side of intersection.

GG07 9th Street Elm
Avenue
Goal is to improve the
9th Street corridor to
create a safe route to
Install high-visibility
crosswalk on north
side of intersection.

DRAFT 96
Greenfield High and
other schools.

GG08 9th Street Maple
Avenue
Goal is to improve the
9th Street corridor to
create a safe route to
Greenfield High and
other schools.

Install high-visibility
crosswalks on north,
south, and east legs
of intersection to
match the crosswalk
on Oak Avenue).

GG09 9th Street Maple
Avenue
Goal is to improve the
9th Street corridor to
create a safe route to
Greenfield High and
other schools.

Install ADAcompliant curb
ramps on all corners
of intersection.

GG10 9th Street Oak Street Goal is to improve the
9th Street corridor to
create a safe route to
Greenfield High and
other schools
Install high-visibility
crosswalk on north
and south legs of
intersection.

GG11 9th Street Oak Street Goal is to improve the
9th Street corridor to
create a safe route to
Greenfield High and
other schools.

Install ADAcompliant curb
ramps (both sides of
northern leg).

GG12 9th Street Palm
Avenue
Goal is to improve the
9th Street corridor to
create a safe route to
Greenfield High and
other schools.

Install high-visibility
crosswalk on north,
south, and east legs
to match the
crosswalk on Oak
Avenue).

GG13 9th Street Palm
Avenue
Goal is to improve the
9th Street corridor to
create a safe route to
Greenfield High and
other schools.

Install ADAcompliant curb
ramps and install
truncated domes on
northern and
southeast corners.

GG14 El Camino
Real
Elm
Avenue
School
entrance
Gaps in bike lane; offstreet paths encourage
more cycling than class
II bike lanes.

Create an off-street
bike path on the
south side of street
beginning at the
vacant lot near the
church and reaching
the marked yellow
crosswalk at the
school driveway.

GG15 El Camino
Real
Elm
Avenue
Large numbers of
vehicles and pedestrians
traveling to middle and
Install pedestrian
scramble crossing
with striping across
DRAFT 97
high school. Conflicts
between students
crossing and left-turning
traffic.
intersection.

GG16 El Camino
Real
School
driveway
exit
Lots of vehicle traffic
coming on and off the
freeway and students
crossing. Reports of
drivers not looking for
pedestrians. No marked
crosswalks.

Conduct ICE analysis
to evaluate for
roundabout. If
roundabout is
warranted, reduce
ECR to one lane
between Tyler
Avenue and US-101
entrance.

GG17 El Camino
Real
Tyler
Avenue
Teneyuque
Avenue
Missing sidewalk. Install sidewalk on
east side of
intersection.

GG18 El Camino
Real
Tyler
Avenue
Lots of students
crossing, conflicts
between pedestrians
and left-turning traffic.

Install leading
pedestrian interval
(all corners).

GG19 El Camino
Real
Tyler
Avenue
Key pedestrian route to
school.

Install a curb
extension at
northwest corner to
match northeast
corner.

GG20 El Camino
Real
Tyler
Avenue
Lots of students
crossing, conflicts
between pedestrians
and left-turning traffic.

Install protected
left-turn signals
from both sides of
Tyler Avenue.

GG21 El Camino
Real
Tyler
Avenue
Lots of students
crossing, reports of
drivers not paying
attention to pedestrians
in crosswalk.

Install “School
ahead” or “School
crossing” signage.

GG22 Elm
Avenue
4th Street Low pedestrian visibility
at intersection.

Install high-visibility
crosswalk on north
side on intersection.

GG23 Elm
Avenue
4th Street 5th Street Low visibility for
students walking after
dark.

Install pedestrianscale lighting along
bridge.

GG24 Elm
Avenue
5th Street Goal is to encourage
pedestrians to cross to
north side of road
before the bridge.

Install high-visibility
crosswalk.

GG25 Elm
Avenue
5th Street Goal is to encourage
pedestrians to cross to
north side of road
Install pedestrian
refuge island at new
east leg crosswalk
DRAFT 98
before the bridge. with RRFB.

GG26 Elm
Avenue
5th Street Goal is to encourage
pedestrians to cross to
north side of road
before the bridge.

Install RRFB.

GG27 Elm
Avenue
8th Street No marked crosswalk. Install high-visibility crosswalk across 8th
St.

GG28 Elm
Avenue
El Camino
Real
Middle
school
driveway
entrance
Low visibility for
students walking after
dark. No bicycle
facilities.

Install pedestrianscale lighting. Study
options to install
class II bike lanes on
both sides of street.

GG30 General Reports of speeding and
drivers not yielding to
pedestrians.

Consider HS student
crossing-guard
program for lower
schools nearby.

GG31 General Parking is available on
campus, but many
students prefer to park
in neighborhoods near
school.

Work with school to
investigate and
remove barriers to
students parking on
campus.

GG32 Moreno St Huerta
Avenue
Reports of near misses
at 2-way stop. Lots of
students crossing here.

Stop warrant for 4-
way stop .

GG33 Moreno St Huerta
Avenue
Matthews
Street
Lots of students
crossing, currently no
marked crosswalks.

Install “School
ahead” or “School
crossing” signage
along street.

GG34 Moreno
Street
Huerta
Avenue
Lots of students
crossing, currently no
marked crosswalks.

Install high-visibility
crosswalks.

GG35 Oak
Avenue
9th Street Goal is to improve the
9th Street corridor to
create a safe route to
Greenfield High and
other schools.

Consider curb
extensions at
existing crosswalk.

GG36 Oak
Avenue
El Camino
Real
Project identified in
Downtown Streetscape
Plan.

Install curb
extensions.

GG37 Oak
Avenue
US-101 N Low pedestrian visibility
at intersection.

Install high-visibility
crosswalk on north
side of intersection.

GG38 Oak
Avenue
US-101 S Low pedestrian visibility
at intersection.

Install high-visibility
crosswalk on north
side of intersection.

DRAFT 99
GG39 Tyler
Avenue
Heidi
Drive
Lots of students walking
to middle and high
school, reports of
drivers not stopping for
pedestrians.

Install high-visibility
crosswalks on north
and west legs of
intersection and
curb ramp.

GXA Citywide Need to update school
signage.

Upgrade signs
around school.

GXB Elm
Avenue
US-101 No bicycle facilities. Widen bridge across
US-101 to include
wider sidewalk and
bicycle facilities.

GV19 General Start and end times are
similar among schools,
which increases traffic
before and after school.

Stagger start and
end times of Arroyo
Seco, Oak Avenue
School, Vista Verde,
and Greenfield HS.

DRAFT 100
Figure 19. Greenfield High Recommendations
DRAFT 101
Mary Chapa
Mary Chapa Academy is located on the north edge of Greenfield, and it draws students primarily from the surrounding neighborhoods (see Figure 20).

Grade
levels
Number of
students
Students qualifying for
free or reduced meals
Students residing
within 1 mile of school
Students using active
transportation (based on
34 survey responses)
K–6 773 89.1% 100% 38%
Figure 20. Map of Mary Chapa Academy Area
Parent Survey
Mary Chapa Academy parents were asked to complete a bilingual survey about their attitudes toward walking and biking to school in the spring of 2022, and 34 surveys were received back. The full survey report is in the Appendix.

The survey asked parents to select the most important factors in their decisions whether to allow their children to walk or bike to school. The top responses are listed in Figure 21, below.

DRAFT 102
Figure 21. Parents’ Concerns about Children Walking or Biking to School (respondents could select more than one)
Top Concerns
Mary Chapa
Academy
Distance 58%
Amount of traffic along route 42%
Speed of traffic along route 32%
Time 32%
Safety of intersections and
crossings 29%
Current Infrastructure Conditions
Motorist Conditions
o At the time of the audit, Mary Chapa Academy had a small drop-off loop and parking lot off El Camino Real. Parking spaces in the lot were reserved for staff and visitors. The school had plans to expand the use of the drop-off loop into a larger area of the parking lot. o Mary Chapa also had a smaller drop-off loop, off Walnut Avenue, that was used for younger grades.
o Significant congestion was not observed in either loop before or after school. o School bus drop-off takes place at a designated bus area off El Camino Real and adjacent to the main parking lot.
o Minimal drop-offs occur on-street along El Camino Real and Walnut Avenue.

Pedestrian Conditions
o There are complete sidewalks on both sides of El Camino Real. There is complete sidewalk on Walnut Avenue adjacent to the school, but there are sidewalk gaps on both sides of Walnut Avenue approaching the bridge over Highway 101.
o The intersection of El Camino Real and Walnut Avenue is signalized and has high-visibility crosswalks, though the striping is faded.
o There are no marked crosswalks over Walnut Ave between El Camino Real and Highway 101.

People were observed crossing mid-block after picking up students from school. o At the time of the audit, there was one crossing guard assisting at the intersection of El Camino Real and Walnut Avenue.

Bicycling Conditions
o There are Class II bike lanes on both sides of El Camino Real between Apple Avenue and Walnut Avenue and north of Walnut Ave. There are no bicycle facilities on Walnut Avenue or nearby neighborhood streets.

DRAFT 103
Recommended Infrastructure Improvements around Mary Chapa Academy.

Table 4 lists recommendations for Mary Chapa Academy, and the map below (Fig. 22) shows their locations in relation to the school.

Table 4. Recommendations for Mary Chapa Academy
ID
Code Street
Cross
Street 1
Cross
Street 2 Issue Recommendation
GM01 Apple
Avenue
8th Street Low pedestrian
visibility at
intersection.

Install high-visibility
crosswalk across 8th (S).

GM02 Apple
Avenue
Calaveras
Way
El Camino
Real
No bicycle facilities. Install bicycle boulevard
with traffic calming,
sharrows, and signage.

GM03 Apple
Avenue
El Camino
Real
Students crossing a
large intersection.

Install curb extensions (NE,
NW).

GM04 Dirt path Calaveras
Way
School
field
Students walking on
dirt path to Walnut
Avenue to get to
school.

Create pedestrian access on
school property between
Calaveras Way and school.

GM05 El Camino
Real
Walnut
Avenue
South
edge of
school
grounds
Low visibility for
drivers exiting the
school parking lot.

Conduct intersection sightdistance analysis and
consider a red curb to
improve visibility at school
driveway exit.

GM06 El Camino
Real
Walnut
Avenue
School
boundary
Pedestrians
crossing, no marked
crosswalk.

Install planned high-visibility
crosswalk with RRFB.

GM07 General Traffic congestion in
school loop.

Implement park-and-walk
program from school district
parking lot.

GM08 Oak
Avenue
US-101 N Low pedestrian
visibility at
intersection.

Install high-visibility
crosswalk (N).

GM09 Oak
Avenue
US-101 S Low pedestrian
visibility at
intersection.

Install high-visibility
crosswalk (N).

GM10 School
bus loop
El Camino
Real
Parents dropping off
in bus loop.

Block entrance to vehicles.

This will probably require a
staff person monitoring a
gate, or cones.

GM11 Walnut
Avenue
Between
El Camino
Real and
US-101
Pedestrians
crossing, no marked
crosswalk.

Install planned high-visibility
crosswalk with median
island and RRFB.

DRAFT 104
GM12 Walnut
Avenue
El Camino
Real
US-101
entrance
Missing sidewalk. In conjunction with Walnut
Avenue street-widening
project, add sidewalks to S
side and fill sidewalk gap on
N side.

GM13 Walnut
Avenue
El Camino
Real
US-101
entrance
No bike facilities,
high traffic volume.

In conjunction with Walnut
Avenue street-widening
project, add class IIB
buffered bike lanes to both
sides.

GM14 Walnut
Avenue
El Camino
Real
Reports of drivers
not yielding to
pedestrians.

Install LPI (all corners).

GM15 Walnut
Avenue
El Camino
Real
Need to update
school signage.

Install or update “School
ahead” or “School crossing”
signage.

GM16 Walnut
Avenue
US-101
entrance
Missing school
signage.

Install “School ahead” or
“School zone” signage.

GXA Citywide Need to update
school signage.

Upgrade signs around
school campuses.

DRAFT 105
Figure 22. Mary Chapa Academy Recommendations
DRAFT 106
Oak Avenue Elementary
Oak Avenue Elementary School is located in southwestern Greenfield, and it draws students primarily from the surrounding neighborhoods (see Figure 23).

Grade
levels
Number of
students
Students qualifying for
free or reduced meals
Students residing
within 1 mile of school
Students using active
transportation (based on
72 survey responses)
K–6 668 86.5% 100% 44%
Figure 23. Map of Oak Avenue Elementary Area
Parent Survey
Oak Avenue Elementary School parents were asked to complete a bilingual survey about their attitudes toward walking and biking to school in the spring of 2022, and 72 responses were received. The full survey report is in Appendix X.

The survey asked parents to select the most important factors in their decisions whether to allow their children to walk or bike to school. The top issues for parents are listed in the graph below.

DRAFT 107
Figure 24. Parents’ Concerns about Children Walking or Biking to School (respondents could select more than one)
Top Concerns
Oak Avenue
Elementary
Safety of intersections and
crossings 39%
Speed of traffic along route 34%
Amount of traffic along route 32%
Time 30%
Violence or crime 27%
Current Infrastructure Conditions
Motorist Conditions
o Oak Avenue Elementary School has a small drop-off loop and a parking lot off Oak Avenue.

Parking spaces in the lot are reserved for staff and some visitors. o At the time of the audit, the drop-off loop was open for student drop-off in the morning but closed to cars in the afternoon: after school, parents are required to park and walk in to pick up their children. There was traffic congestion in the drop-off loop before school and on Oak Avenue before and after school.
o Drop-off also took place on Oak Avenue near the school. o School bus drop-off takes place on Oak Avenue in front of the school. o The speed limit is 25 mph on Oak Avenue near the school.

Pedestrian Conditions
o There are complete sidewalks on both sides of Oak Avenue. o The intersection of Oak Avenue and Tom Rogers Circle is controlled by stop signs and has yellow high-visibility crosswalks in place.
o There are high-visibility yellow crosswalks at the intersection of Oak Avenue and 12th Street. o At the time of the audit, there was one crossing guard at 12th Street and Oak Avenue.

Bicycling Conditions
o There are class II bike lanes on the south side of Oak Avenue between 13th Street and the edge of the school campus. There are no bicycle facilities on other nearby neighborhood streets.

Recommended Infrastructure Improvements around Oak Avenue Elementary School Table 5 lists recommendations for Oak Avenue Elementary School, and the map below (Figure 25) shows their locations in relation to the school.

DRAFT 108
Table 5. Recommendations for Oak Avenue Elementary School ID
Code Street
Cross
Street 1
Cross
Street 2 Issue Recommendation
GK01 12th
Street
Oak
Avenue
Elm
Avenue
Missing sidewalk. Install sidewalk on south side
of this intersection.

GK02 Apple
Avenue
Hutchinson
Drive
Reports of speeding. Install mini traffic circle or
curb extensions as part of
bike boulevard project.

GK03 General Traffic congestion in front
of school.

Implement a park-and-walk
program with the Greenfield
Community Center.

GK04 General School has concerns about
students walking home
alone; crossing guards
send them back to school
to wait for parents.

Give crossing guards walkietalkies to more easily
communicate with school
staff.

GK05 Hicks
Drive
12th Street Curb ramps are not ADA
compliant.

Install ADA-compliant curb
ramps (all corners).

GK06 Hicks
Drive
12th Street Low pedestrian visibility at
intersection, lots of
students crossing.

Install high-visibility
crosswalks across east and
west legs of Hicks Drive.

GK07 Oak
Avenue
11th Street Students crossing, no
marked crosswalks.

Install curb extensions and
high-visibility crosswalks (all
corners).

GK08 Oak
Avenue
12th Street High numbers of vehicles
and people walking to
several schools. Crossing
guard can’t keep up with
pedestrian volume.

Recruit an additional
crossing guard for this
intersection.

GK09 Oak
Avenue
12th Street High numbers of vehicles
and people walking to
several schools.

Install curb extensions (all
corners).

GK10 Oak
Avenue
12th Street Reports of speeding and
of drivers not yielding to
pedestrians.

Install mini-traffic circle to
slow traffic approaching
school.

GK11 Oak
Avenue
13th Street Drivers may not know
they’re in a school zone
until very close to campus.

Install “School ahead”
signage.

GK12 Oak
Avenue
9th Street Route to Oak Avenue
Elementary and
Greenfield High.

Consider curb extensions at
crosswalk
GK13 Oak
Avenue
Renfro
Place
Missing “School zone”
signage.

Install “School crossing”
signage.

GK14 Oak
Avenue
San
Antonio
Drive
Missing “School zone”
signage.

Install “School crossing”
signage.

DRAFT 109
GK15 Oak
Avenue
School
driveways
near San
Antonio
Drive and
Renfro
Place
Pedestrians crossing midblock without marked
crosswalk.

Install signage at entrance
and exit directing
pedestrians to the crossing
at Tom Rogers Cir, rather
than at unmarked areas near
San Antonio Drive or Renfro
Place.

GK16 Oak
Avenue
Tom
Rogers
Circle
Current crosswalk location
creates confusion
between pedestrians and
drivers at the intersection
of Oak Avenue and Tom
Rogers Cir.

Move crosswalk and curb
extension to be in line with
intersection.

GK17 Oak
Avenue
Tom
Rogers
Circle
Missing “School zone”
signage.

Install “School crossing”
signage.

GK18 Oak
Avenue
midblock
Between
9th Street
and El
Camino
Real
Missing curb ramps at
crosswalk by post office.

Install curb ramps on either
end of midblock crosswalk.

GK19 Oak
Avenue
midblock
Between
9th Street
and El
Camino
Real
Reports of drivers not
paying attention to
pedestrians in crosswalk.

Consider curb extensions at
midblock crosswalk.

GK20 School
driveway
loop
Oak
Avenue
Current red curb striping
in drop-off loop indicates
a no-stopping zone.

Replace red paint in drop-off
loop with yellow, to indicate
loading zone.

GXA Citywide Need to update school
signage.

Upgrade signs around school
campus.

GV19 General Start and end times are
similar between schools,
which increases traffic
before and after school.

Stagger start and end times
of Arroyo Seco, Oak Avenue
School, Vista Verde, and
DRAFT
Greenfield HS.
110
Figure 25. Oak Avenue Elementary Recommendations
DRAFT 111
Vista Verde Middle School
Vista Verde Middle School is located on the southwestern edge of Greenfield, and it draws students from throughout the city, being the only local middle school (see Map 26).

Grade
levels
Number of
students
Students qualifying for
free or reduced meals
Students residing
within 1 mile of school
Students using active
transportation (based on
50 survey responses)
7–8 750 80.1% 75% 40%
Figure 26. Map of Vista Verde Middle School Area
Parent Survey
Vista Verde Middle School parents were asked to complete a bilingual survey about their attitudes toward walking and biking to school in the spring of 2022, and 50 responses were received. The full survey report is in Appendix X.

The survey asked parents to select the most important factors in their decisions whether to allow their children to walk or bike to school. The top issues for parents are listed in Figure 27, below.

DRAFT 112
Figure 27. Parents’ Concerns about Children Walking or Biking to School (respondents could select more than one)
Top Concerns
Vista Verde
Middle
Distance 44%
Speed of traffic along route 35%
Safety of intersections and
crossings 29%
Amount of traffic along route 29%
Violence or crime 29%
Current Infrastructure Conditions
Motorist Conditions
o Vista Verde Middle School has a drop-off loop off and a parking lot off Heidi Drive. Parking spaces in the lot are reserved for staff and some visitors. o Drop-off takes place in the main drop-off loop and on Heidi Drive and Elm Avenue. There is heavy congestion before and after school, particularly at the intersection of Heidi and Elm. o School bus drop-off takes place at the designated bus loop off Elm Avenue.

Pedestrian Conditions
o There are complete sidewalks on Elm Avenue between 12th Street and El Camino Real. There is a segment of informal asphalt sidewalk adjacent to the vacant lot on Elm Avenue. o At the time of the audit, there was no sidewalk on the north side of 12th Street between Elm and Oak Avenues. There are also sidewalk gaps on Elm Avenue west of 12th Street. o The intersection of Heidi Drive and Elm Avenue is not signalized and has a standard striped crosswalk across Heidi Drive.
o There is a high-visibility crosswalk across Elm Avenue at 12th Street. o At the time of the audit, there was one crossing guard on Heidi Drive.

Bicycling Conditions
o There is a segment of class II bike lane on Elm Street in front of the school, but it ends just east of the school and does not extend to downtown Greenfield. Bike lanes extend on Elm Avenue west of the school to 13th Street.
o There is bike lane in one direction on 12th Street between Elm Ave and just short of Oak Avenue. There are no bicycle facilities along nearby neighborhood streets.

Recommended Infrastructure Improvements around Vista Verde Middle School Table 6 lists recommendations for Vista Verde Middle School, and the map below (Figure 27) shows their locations in relation to the school.

DRAFT 113
Table 6. Recommendations for Vista Verde Middle School
ID
Code Street
Cross
Street 1
Cross
Street 2 Issue Recommendation
GV01 12th
Street
Elm
Avenue
Missing curb ramps make it
hard to use a stroller,
wheelchair, or bike on the
sidewalk.

Install curb ramp on
northwest corner when
sidewalk is installed .

GV02 12th
Street
Elm
Avenue
Low pedestrian visibility at
intersection.

Install high-visibility
crosswalk on north side
when sidewalk is installed
.

GV03 12th
Street
Elm
Avenue
Reports of drivers not yielding
to pedestrians in the
crosswalk.

Install flashing stop signs
on east and west sides of
Elm Avenue ).

GV04 12th
Street
Elm
Avenue
Walnut
Avenue
No bike facilities. Study options to install
class II bike lane.

GV05 12th
Street
Elm
Avenue
Reports of drivers not yielding
to pedestrians in the
crosswalk. Need for
supervision, history of fights.

Station crossing guard at
this intersection.

GV06 12th
Street
Oak
Avenue
Elm
Avenue
Missing sidewalk. Install sidewalk on south
side.

GV07 US-101
Bridge
4th Street
/ 5th St
Low visibility for students
walking after dark.

Install pedestrian-scale
lighting along bridge.

GV08 Elm
Avenue
12th
Street
Don
Vicente
Drive
Goal is to slow traffic and
restrict left turns in and out of
the senior living complex
driveway.

Install raised median from
bus loop exit to senior
apartment driveway.

GV09 Elm
Avenue
12th
Street
Near
Gianolini
Parkway
Missing sidewalk. Formalize sidewalk on
north side.

GV10 Elm
Avenue
4th Street 5th
Street
Low visibility for students
walking after dark.

Install pedestrian-scale
lighting along bridge.

GV11 Elm
Avenue
4th Street Low pedestrian visibility at
intersection.

Install high-visibility
crosswalk across north
side of intersection.

GV12 Elm
Avenue
5th Street Goal is to encourage
pedestrians to cross to north
side of road before the bridge.

Install high-visibility
crosswalk across Elm
Avenue.

GV13 Elm
Avenue
5th Street Goal is to encourage
pedestrians to cross to north
side of road before the bridge.

Install RRFB.

GV14 Elm
Avenue
5th Street Goal is to encourage
pedestrians to cross to north
side of road before the bridge.

Install pedestrian refuge
island at new E crosswalk
with RRFB.

GV15 Elm El Camino School Low visibility for students Install pedestrian-scale DRAFT 114
Avenue Real driveway
entrance
walking after dark. lighting. Study options to
install class II bike lanes
on both sides of street.

GV16 Elm
Avenue
El Camino
Real
US-101
bridge
Key pedestrian route to
school.

Install or restripe bike
lane/edge line.

GV17 Elm
Avenue
Elmwood
Drive
Reports of drivers not yielding
to pedestrians. Low visibility
for students walking after
dark.

Install planned RRFB and
pedestrian-scale lighting
at existing midblock
crossing.

GV18 Elm
Avenue
Elmwood
Drive
Missing curb ramps make it
hard to use a stroller,
wheelchair, or bike on the
sidewalk.

Install curb ramp (north
side).

GV19 General Start and end times are similar
between schools, which
creates more traffic before
and after school.

Stagger start and end
times of Arroyo Seco, Oak
Avenue School, Vista
Verde, and Greenfield HS.

GV20 Heidi
Drive
Elm
Avenue
Missing signage. Install “School crossing”
signage.

GV21 Heidi
Drive/
Don
Vincente
Drive
Elm
Avenue
Lots of students walking, low
pedestrian visibility at
intersection.

Install high-visibility
crosswalk across Heidi
Drive.

GV22 Heidi
Drive/
Don
Vincente
Drive
Elm
Avenue
Large numbers of vehicles and
pedestrians at intersection
after school. Difficult for
drivers to turn from Heidi to
Elm, and concerns about
pedestrian safety.

Study options for
intersection control in
conjunction with
upcoming Master
Circulation Plan.

GV23 Oak
Avenue
12th
Street
Key pedestrian route to
school. Reports of speeding on
Oak Avenue.

Recruit an additional
crossing guard for this
intersection.

GXA Citywide Need to update school
signage.

Upgrade signs around
school campus.

GXB Elm
Avenue
US-101 No bicycle facilities. Widen bridge across US101 to include wider sidewalk and bicycle
facilities.

DRAFT 115
Figure 27. Vista Verde Middle School Recommendations
DRAFT 116
Policy and Program Recommendations
The recommendations below are for all school sites and are arranged by implementing agency and type of program. Some recommendations are listed under multiple organizations that could take the lead on implementation.

Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC)
Education
• Support the Street Smarts traffic-safety education campaign, including information on how to use new infrastructure like roundabouts, class IV separated bikeways, and pedestrian hybrid beacons.
• Install traffic gardens at elementary schools and parks to provide space for traffic safety education.
• Promote the TAMC program that allows citizens to report sidewalk and bicycle facility hazards on Greenfield roadways.

Encouragement
• Work with schools to develop SchoolPool carpooling programs, with incentives for participation such as priority parking spaces and drop-off lanes.
• Develop a bar-code scanner program that notifies parents when students arrive at school. • Develop a pilot program to structure school drop-off times and locations by grade level, and align it with education programs.
• Promote the TAMC Safe Routes website (https://saferoutesmonterey.org/) as a community resource for establishing walking school buses, finding safety information, etc. • Continue to provide bike and skateboard racks to schools through the Bicycle Secure program.

Equity
• Design and implement public outreach and engagement that are broadly accessible and provide means for everyone to participate.
• Provide an equitable share of transportation investments to underserved, racially diverse communities to improve their health, safety, and quality of life.

School Districts
Education
• Incorporate traffic safety education into school curriculums. • Partner with TAMC and other Safe Routes to Schools partners to provide bicycle and pedestrian safety education and training at every elementary school.

Encouragement
• Adopt a district-wide policy supporting active transportation projects and programs. • Establish a Safe Routes to Schools contact at the district level to act as point person for education, programs, and events.
• Provide orientation for principals and school staff on Safe Routes to Schools programs and best practices, including traffic management.
• Where a bus stop for one school is near another school, relocate the bus stop or adjust pick-up DRAFT 117
times to reduce congestion.
• Promote events that encourage active transportation, such as Walk and Bike to School Day. • Use the TAMC Bicycle Secure program to provide secure bike, scooter, and skateboard parking at each school site.
• Consider the use of electric school buses.

Engagement
• Reassess crossing guard funding and recruiting structures to allow for at least one crossing guard per school at both morning drop-off and afternoon pick-up times, or develop a volunteer crossing guard program to recruit and motivate volunteers.

City of Greenfield: Police, Parks and Recreation, and Public Works Departments Education
• Train police officers to teach traffic safety, with a focus on driver safety, and accurately report any collisions involving cyclists or pedestrians.
• Incorporate bike/walk safety trainings or helmet giveaways into Parks and Recreation Department messaging, after-school programs, and events.

Encouragement
• Support and promote bike and pedestrian encouragement activities such as Bike Month, Ciclovía, and Walk and Bike to School Day.
• Apply for Bicycle Friendly Community designation through the League of American Bicyclists (could involve city staff and community volunteers).

School Sites
Education
• Distribute a traffic circulation plan and bike and pedestrian safety information to parents at the beginning of the school year through all available channels (email, handouts, parent meetings, back to school nights, etc.).
• Hold school safety assemblies for students at the beginning of the school year to go over safe walking, biking, and drop-off practices.
• Pass out bike maps, resource lists, and bike cage information to students every fall, and conduct annual bike safety clinics.
• Incorporate active transportation into social and emotional learning curriculums. • Incorporate Chalk Your Walk programs into arts curriculums. • Develop a curriculum for teaching students about the climate impacts of transportation, transportation infrastructure, and the built environment. • For high school students, promote bus routes for school transportation, develop carpool incentive programs, and offer bike maintenance courses through a Regional Occupation Center (ROP) program.
• For high school students, expand health leadership groups to include active transportation issues, such as student bike/pedestrian counts, active transportation projects, and Safe Routes to Schools support for younger students.

DRAFT 118
• Provide information to school staff about active-transportation and carpooling options, including electric bikes.

Encouragement
• Incorporate active transportation and support for Walk and Bike to School Day into schools’ health policies.
• Designate an administrative staff member as the Safe Routes to Schools contact at each school. • Work to achieve Blue Zones Project school certification. • Host biannual Walk and Bike to School Day events.
• Develop walking and rolling school bus programs with incentives for participation. • Develop SchoolPool carpooling programs with incentives for participation, including priority parking spaces and drop-off lanes.
• Establish and encourage the use of Park and Walk/Ride locations. • Promote and incentivize middle- and high-school bike clubs, mountain bike clubs, and skateboard clubs.
• Promote and incentivize family walking and biking groups to encourage more eyes on the street, potentially through existing parent groups.
• Stagger school start times between grade levels to disperse drop-off traffic. • Stagger start times for schools within two blocks of each other. • Adjust school delivery times to avoid drop-off periods. • Develop partnerships with arts programs to install public art along routes to schools. • Add active-transportation information to school staff signatures. • Pursue grant funding through the Specialized Outride program to bring bikes and bike education to middle schools.

Engagement
• When possible, have school staff or volunteers help with traffic control in school parking lots for 15 minutes before and after school.
• Pursue the AAA School Safety Patrol program to engage students in transportation safety (Monterey Park Elementary is a model).

Non-Profits and Monterey County Health Department
Education
• Develop an annual crossing guard training program.
• Develop programs and events to provide parents and guardians with traffic safety education, such as the following:
o Offer community traffic safety education events on weekends. o Provide traffic safety messaging at established parent meetings and events, such as back-to-school nights and spring open houses.
o Locate traffic-safety education staff members at schools to talk to parents during dropoff. o Work with parent leaders to develop parent-driven programs. o Provide training and tips on using the school drop-off loop.

DRAFT 119
• Provide driver safety training targeting youths and seniors. Consider partnering with the Greenfield Police Department or insurance companies to provide discounts for participation. • Provide bike and pedestrian safety training during after-school programs, such as the YMCA and the Boys and Girls Club.
• Provide pedestrian safety education and training for second graders, including classroom education and on-blacktop or neighborhood walking instruction. • Provide bicycle safety education and training for fifth graders, including classroom education and on-bike safety rodeos taught by certified safety instructors. • Develop a vertical education program with specific safety messaging for each grade level. • Develop programs or events to provide family-focused bike- and walk-safety trainings. • Pass out bike maps, resource lists, and bike cage information to students every fall, and conduct annual bike safety clinics. Work with family resource centers to offer bike and pedestrian education and support.
• Develop a curriculum for teaching students about the climate impacts of transportation, transportation infrastructure, and the built environment. • For high school students, promote bus routes for school transportation, develop carpool incentive programs, and offer bike maintenance courses through an ROP program. • For high school students, expand health leadership groups to include active transportation issues, such as student bike/pedestrian counts, active transportation projects, and Safe Routes to Schools support for younger students.
• Support the Street Smarts traffic safety education campaign, including information on how to use new infrastructure like roundabouts and sharrows.
• Promote the City program that allows citizens to report sidewalk hazards.

Encouragement
• Provide orientation for principals and school staff on Safe Routes to Schools programs and best practices.
• Develop year-round walking or rolling school bus programs with incentives for participation. • Develop a walking/rolling school bus toolkit and training presentation for parent volunteers. • Develop SchoolPool carpooling programs, with incentives for participation such as priority parking spaces and drop-off lanes.
• Develop a social media campaign focused on students and school staff to encourage more biking and walking.
• Consider a program to provide free bus passes to students. • Offer middle- and high-school bike clubs, mountain bike clubs, scooter clubs, and skateboard clubs.
• Coordinate family walking and biking groups to encourage more eyes on the street. • Develop and promote earn-a-bike or bike-loan programs in which students earn a bike by riding frequently or maintaining perfect attendance. Explore partnerships with the Greenfield Police Department to provide abandoned bikes to students.
• Organize helmet giveaway events for students and families. • Develop programs to install public art along routes to schools. • Consider a neighborhood grant program to support programs such as walking school buses.

DRAFT 120
Equity
• Include members of disadvantaged communities as stakeholders, and consider language accessibility in program development. Emphasize the relationship between health and active transportation in all program messaging.
• Provide bilingual materials and staff for all programs. • Conduct an audit of past policies that have limited access to safe transportation options, and propose new policies to address those inequities.

Monterey-Salinas Transit (MST)
Encouragement
• Consider a program to provide free bus passes to students. • Expand bus routes to serve middle and high schools that are not currently served by MST, including Greenfield High and Vista Verde Middle.

DRAFT 121
Greenfield Safe Routes to Schools Plan
Chapter 4D. Implementation, Reporting,
and Maintenance
Implementation and Reporting
The projects in this plan will be implemented over time as funding becomes available. With limited funding, the City of Greenfield must decide how to prioritize the recommendations.

Some projects that are low in cost and have community support can be incorporated into the City’s maintenance programs and completed using maintenance funds. For larger projects, leveraging local funds with additional grant funding will be critical. Some projects also require either private property acquisition or coordination with Caltrans. Although these are high-cost projects that will take many years to fund, design, and construct, they are included here as part of a long-term vision for the future of transportation in Greenfield.

The City of Greenfield has the opportunity to make bicycle and pedestrian improvements as part of ongoing road maintenance. The is required to upgrade curb ramps to Americans with Disabilities Act standards during major road resurfacing projects. Many resurfacing projects also provide chances to restripe roadways and install improvements such as high-visibility crosswalks, class IIB buffered bike lanes, green bike lane treatments, and class IV separated bikeways at a relatively low additional cost.

Traffic signal maintenance and upgrades also provide opportunities to install countdown pedestrian signal heads, leading pedestrian interval signal phasing, and video detection for bicyclists. City staff will review the Safe Routes to Schools Plan project list when planning maintenance projects to look for ways to incorporate bike and pedestrian improvements. This allows for highly cost-effective implementation of the projects included in this plan.

Installing bicycle and pedestrian improvements as part of regularly scheduled maintenance is a “quickbuild’ approach to providing bicycle and pedestrian facilities, meaning local jurisdictions can construct the facilities faster using low-cost materials. Materials such as paint, planters, and plastic posts are less expensive initially than new pavement or changes to curb alignments, but they have more substantial ongoing maintenance costs. Quick-build is best suited to temporary trial projects that can be adjusted on the basis of initial success of the design and community feedback. More information on the quickbuild approach can be found in the Quick-Build Guide developed by the California Bicycle Coalition and Alta Planning + Design.1
Projects from this plan can also be installed as future development occurs in Greenfield. This Safe Routes to Schools Plan provides a list of projects that can mitigate the impact of land-use developments by reducing vehicle miles traveled. In 2013, California lawmakers approved Senate Bill 743, which 1 California Bicycle Coalition website, Quick Build Bikeway Networks: https://www.calbike.org/our_initiatives/quick-build-bikeway-networksfor-safer-streets/.

DRAFT 122
considers vehicle miles traveled as a metric to determine impacts in transportation analysis under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Jurisdictions are no longer required to use traffic congestion or level of service as a metric, though they can still enforce those through consistency with the agency’s General Plan. In addition, the traditional level-of-service metric may still be relevant to CEQA, as it relates to impacts on public services, including emergency response and transit. The state released guidelines in 2018 that recommended the use of vehicle miles traveled as the key metric for analyzing transportation impacts. The Safe Routes to Schools Plan is a resource that the city and developers can use for project ideas to improve biking and walking facilities and reduce vehicle miles traveled.

This chapter includes a list of roadways that are high priorities for improvement, based on criteria that are aligned with the vision and goals of this plan. Individual projects will be prioritized for funding through the Monterey County Regional Transportation Plan and the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Reporting on project funding, design, and construction will occur through updates to the city council and the public during the annual CIP update process.

For projects within Caltrans rights of way, all improvements must be consistent with Highway Access Management Plans, and Caltrans maintenance agreements are required before new construction.

Corridor Prioritization
Key routes to school in Greenfield were ranked to help City decisionmakers and staff prioritize projects and identify the most competitive ones for various grant opportunities. Grant programs often prioritize larger-scale, corridor-wide improvements, and future grant applications are likely to focus on improvements to one or more streets of Greenfield rather than individual projects.

The corridors below were evaluated using four criteria aligned with the vision and goals of this plan and with common grant application criteria. Equity scores are based on two sources: free or reduced price meal data, as an indicator of family income, and the Healthy Places Index map, which shows data on health indicators such as education, job opportunities, and clean air and water. Each corridor was assigned a number from 0 to 100 based on the criteria in Table 7.

Table 7: Criteria for Corridor Prioritization
Criteria Description Max Points
Safety
Points awarded for bicycle and pedestrian collisions in the last 10 years within 150 ft of the project, for a max of 30:
• 5 points per fatal or severe-injury collision.
• 1 point per other visible injury or complaint-of-pain collision.
30 Access to Key
Destinations
10 points for every school within 500 ft of the corridor, and 5 points for every park, library, and recreation center, for a max of 25 points.
25 Equity 20 points if the project is located within an area designated as disadvantaged. 20
CommunityIdentified Need15 points if the project or location was identified by 10+ members of the community during project outreach. 25
DRAFT 123
10 points if the project or location was identified in one or more community planning documents.

TOTAL 100
Prioritized Corridor List
Table 8, below, shows the highest-priority corridors for Safe Routes to Schools improvements in the City of Greenfield. High-priority corridors are also shown below on Figure 28.

Table 8: Prioritized Corridors List.

Street Cross Street 1 Cross Street 2 Score
Apple Avenue 13th Street 2nd Street 100
Oak Avenue 13th Street 2nd Street 100
Walnut Avenue 12th Street 2nd Street 100
Elm Avenue 13th Street 3rd Street 95
El Camino Real Cherry Avenue Hwy 101 off-ramp 95
9th Street Elm Avenue Apple Avenue 55
12th Street Harvest Way Elm Avenue 50
7th Street/Moreno
Avenue Tyler Avenue End of street 40
DRAFT 124
Figure 28. Map of Greenfield High-Priority Corridors.

Participatory Budgeting Funded Projects
The Greenfield Steering Committee led a participatory budgeting process, a democratic process in which community members decide how to spend part of a public budget. TAMC allocated $250,000 per city to implement projects from the Safe Routes to Schools Plan, and Steering Committees developed a process for community members to vote on which projects should be funded.

The Greenfield election was held in December 2022. People over the age of 14 who lived or worked in Greenfield were eligible to vote, and voting was possible online and at 11 voting sites throughout the DRAFT 125
city. In total, 244 ballots were received, which identified four projects as the highest priorities for community members. Steering Committee members presented the results to the Greenfield City Council for approval in March 2023 and received approval. Projects funded through the participatory budgeting process will begin implementation as soon as 2025. The City of Greenfield will carry out as many recommendations as is feasible given current construction costs.

Table 9: Participatory Budgeting Funded Projects
School Location Project Description
Vista Verde Middle, Oak
Avenue Elementary
12th Street between
Oak and Elm Avenues
Install 0.24 miles of sidewalk, high-visibility
crosswalks, curb ramps, and flashing stop signs.

All schools Citywide Upgrade signs around all school campuses.

Arroyo Seco Academy 12th Street between
Cherry Avenue and
Harvest Way
Install 0.12 miles of sidewalk on 12th Street.

Vista Verde Middle,
Greenfield High
Heidi Drive Install high-visibility crosswalk and “School crossing” signage.

Funding Sources
The following table lists potential grant and program funding sources that can be used to implement the projects identified in this plan. Most state and federal funding sources require local matching funds.

Table 10: Funding Sources for Active Transportation
Funding Source Capital
Improvements
Evaluation
& Planning
Education,
Encouragement &
Enforcement Programs
Maintenance
Local
Measure X: Regional Sales Tax X X X X
Transportation Development
Act X X X X
City General Funds X X X X
City Gas Tax Revenues X X X X
Foundations X X X
Businesses and Corporations X X
Regional Surface Transportation
Program: Competitive Funds X X X X
Regional Surface Transportation
Program: Formula Funds X X X X
Developer Impact Fees X
State
Active Transportation Program X X X
DRAFT 126
California Office of Traffic Safety X
AB 2766 X X X
State Highway Operations and
Protection Program (SHOPP) X X
State Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP) X
Federal
Surface Transportation Block
Grant/Regional Surface
Transportation Program
Exchange (STBG/RSTPX)
X X X
Highway Safety Improvement
Program X X
Rebuilding American
Infrastructure with
Sustainability and Equity
(RAISE) Program
X
Safe Streets 4 All Program X
American Rescue Plan Act X X X X
Measure X
To address an ongoing shortage in transportation funding, Monterey County voters approved Measure X in 2016, establishing a 3/8-percent sales tax that will provide approximately $20 million annually for local transportation projects over the next thirty years. Sixty percent of the funds are distributed by formula to cities and the County of Monterey for road maintenance, repair, and safety projects. This funding, together with funding in the Pedestrian and Bike Safety and Mobility category, can be used for Safe Routes to Schools projects.

DRAFT 2
127
Figure 29: Measure X Expenditure Categories
Source: Transportation Agency for Monterey County.

Maintenance
The need for maintenance of bicycle and pedestrian facilities is often reported by residents walking and bicycling on local roadways. There are several ways to report such issues in and around the City of Greenfield:
• Maintenance issues can be reported through the City of Greenfield website. https://ci.greenfield.ca.us/FormCenter/Miscellaneous-8/Maintenance-Service-Request-73. • TAMC maintains the Bicycle Service Request program, a webpage where any issue related to bicycle safety in the county can be reported: https://www.tamcmonterey.org/bike-servicerequest-form. Reports are forwarded to the appropriate jurisdiction for action. • Maintenance issues on state highways can be reported to Caltrans at https://csr.dot.ca.gov/.

The City of Greenfield is responsible for maintaining pavement on roads that it has accepted for maintenance. The City also maintains signage, signals, striping, guardrails, and other traffic-safety devices, walls and other retaining structures, and drainage facilities serving the roadway.

The City of Greenfield currently employs the following maintenance policies and procedures to keep bicycle and pedestrian facilities in good repair:
• Bike lanes that are contiguous with any City-maintained roadway are maintained by the City as part of the roadway. The City strives to sweep bike lanes on a pre-determined schedule through TriCities Disposal and Recycling.
• According to the California Streets and Highways Code Section 5610, adjacent property owners are responsible for the maintenance of sidewalks along the frontage of their properties. • According to the Streets and Highways Code, a set amount of maintenance funding is provided by the gas tax, and the City is charged with maintaining roadways as well as those funds allow.

There is no specific standard to which a roadway must be maintained, but ideally, roads are resealed every five to ten years to keep pavement in good condition. The City works to budget the funding it receives to provide the greatest benefit to the greatest number of road users.

Regional Road
Projects, 27%
Mobility for
All , 13%
Local Road
Projects, 60%
DRAFT 128
r
Salinas Valley
Safe Routes to
School Plan
Draft Plan
Greenfield City Council
November 12th, 2024
129
Project Overview
• 22 schools in Gonzales, Soledad, Greenfield & King City • Partnership between TAMC, MCHD,
Ecology Action, Cities, and school districts
• Funded by Caltrans Planning
Grant & Measure X
• 2022 – 2024
• Steering Committees
for each city
130
Plan Goals
• Improve safety for people
walking and biking
• Reduce traffic congestion
• Healthier kids
• Support future grant applications
131
A Community-Based Process
Final Plan
2024
Pilot
Project
Fall 2022
Recommendations
Fall 2022
Walking Audits &
Parent Surveys
Spring 2022
Parent
Outreach
Spring 2022
Steering
Committee
2022 - 2023
132
Draft Plan Outreach
• 10 presentations at parent meetings
• 540 responses to parent survey
• 146 responses to 12th Street pilot
project survey
• 244 community votes during
Participatory Budgeting process
133
Draft Plan Overview
• High-level goals and objectives
• List of prioritized corridors
• Citywide corridor recommendations
• Infrastructure and program
recommendations for each school
134
Plan Implementation
• Plan is a tool to help the City
prioritize projects and seek funding
• Some projects can be
implemented during regular road
maintenance
• Quick-build projects offer lowercost option to implement projects Image source: City of Austin
135
r
Questions or
Comments?
136
f
MEMORANDUM: November 5, 2024
AGENDA DATE: November 12, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Paul Wood, City Manager
TITLE: FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025 Quarter 1 (July-September 2024)

FINANCIAL REVIEW
PURPOSE:

The purpose of this review is to present to the City Council and the public where the City is, financially, at the end of the first fiscal quarter of FY24-25.

This presentation shows the revenues and expenditures of the General Fund (where the vast majority of expenditures take place. The General Fund is comprised of 4 funds: the General Fund, the Fire Fund, the Community Outreach Fund and the Measures V & W Fund. The main takeaways here are the following:
• Combined, revenues at the midway point are at 14.3% of budgeted revenues (expected is approximately 15%). The reason the expected is so low (intuition might suggest that 25% is expected) is that revenues do not arrive at the city evenly throughout the year. Important points to note are the following:
o We have an Additions column that shows, by fund, additional revenues that have been received after September 30. In some cases, these additions are substantial (cannabis tax revenues).
o In large part, all property taxes it either in December or April of each fiscal year, neither of which time frames are included in this quarterly report. Also, Vehicle in Lieu Fees, which are a significant portion of general fund revenues, are received with property taxes.
o As stated in previous years, sales taxes are received by the city from the State two months in arrears, so our sales tax numbers only reflect one month’s worth of sales tax. In the Additions column, we have added a second month that we have received for the quarter.

City Council Memorandum 599 El Camino Real Greenfield CA 93937 831-674-5591 www.ci.greenfield.ca.us
137
o In general, we are tracking on target with the budget for fiscal year 24 – 25. • Combined, expenditures at the midway point are at 21.3% of budgeted expenditures (expected is 25%)
o I will talk in more detail at the presentation about positive and negative consequences of variances in spending.

BACKGROUND:

Expenditures
While it would be great, from an analytical perspective, to assume that 50% of expenditures would be normal through the first 6 months of the year, the actual expenditures do not occur quite that evenly over the year. Two years ago, the mid-year review reflected that the City was at 38% of expenditures. Being at 38% is not necessarily normal, for Greenfield, the normal might be somewhere around 45-48%. All to say that, I believe, we are approaching normal expenditure levels.

The reasons are many and varied, but they include significant events like the following:
• If capital projects are being funded out of the General Fund, and the expenditures for them do not take place until later in the year,
• Personnel positions that have been approved in the budget not being filled at the beginning of the fiscal year.

In fact, both of these reasons are relevant to the first 3 months of the fiscal year. In the case of personnel, it is very relevant.

Since personnel expenses comprise a significant portion of total General Fund expenditures, when a position is left unfilled for an extended period of time, the expenditure savings can add up quickly. When multiple positions are left unfilled, it adds up significantly.

During the budget process this past spring, as you recall, we had a very difficult time balancing the budget. Because personnel is such a high proportion of overall spending, one of our strategies to get to a balanced budget was to time the hiring of vacant positions so that we could accrue savings that would contribute to the balancing of the budget.

During the first 3 months of the year, Greenfield’s Public Works staff was underfilled, and that is reflected financially in that the Public Works – Administration was at 13% and Streets was at 18%.

Depending on the position, that created “x” amount of salary and benefit savings. That is positive from a financial perspective, but not so much from a community services perspective.

The same could be said for Police Patrol Services in the general fund, which is at 20.8% through three months.
138
City Council and staff work hard during the budget process in the spring to budget for an optimal level of staffing to get “all the work done.” If full staffing does not happen, then either (1) all the work does not get completed, or (2) we have to pay overtime to (a) other employees or (b) outside contractors that are doing the work.

So, it’s a trade-off between savings and serving the public. At best, it is a balancing act that involves both understanding where we are revenue-wise and the community’s flexibility with what they will accept in the way of services provided for the tax dollars paid.

Overall, the main points are the following:

1. Revenues are on track through the first quarter of the year. The report (which is not accrual-based accounting) shows us that we are at 14.3% vs. an assumed 15%. The reality is that if accruals were posted, we would probably be slightly above budget.

2. Expenditures are lower than expected through the first quarter of the year. The report (which is not accrual-based accounting) shows us that we are at 21.3% vs. an assumed 25%.

3. Staff believes that expenditures are lower than budgeted mainly because of the shortage of personnel, lowering expenditures slightly.

COUNCIL ACTION
No action is required, as this is a presentation.
139
Fund Sum of 24-25 Q1 Sum of 24-25 Budget Additions
100 (1,460,166.00) (14,848,153.32) 9.8% (797,913.00)
Charges for Services (44,128.79) (197,300.00) 22.4%
Fees & Permits (908,346.89) (4,250,924.10) 21.4%
Fines & Forfeitures (2,703.88) (65,000.00) 4.2%
Franchise Fees (7,098.34) (272,708.73) 2.6%
Interfund Transfer - (1,175,449.04) 0.0%
Other Revenues (25,106.11) (134,000.00) 18.7%
Other Taxes (412,081.42) (5,077,505.06) 8.1% (797,913.00) Recreation Use Fees (23,006.96) (112,500.00) 20.5%
Rev Other Agencies (25,118.88) (170,000.00) 14.8%
Revenue from Other Agencies - (111,975.00) 0.1%
Tax Revenue (1,696.48) (3,180,689.37) 0.1%
Use of Money & Prop (10,878.25) (100,102.02) 8.7%
102 (4,849.88) (1,786,771.20) 0.3% (125,000.00)
Charges for Services (3,400.00) (5,000.00) 68.0%
Interfund Transfer - (500,000.00) 0.0% (125,000.00)
Other Revenues (1,449.88) (40,000.00) 3.6%
Other Taxes - (1,241,771.20) 0.0%
105 - (376,526.72) 0.0% -
Revenue from Other Agencies - (376,526.72) 0.0%
220 (402,175.54) (4,354,151.00) 9.2% (261,000.00)
Other Taxes (402,175.54) (4,354,151.00) 9.2% (261,000.00) Grand Total (1,867,191.42) (21,365,602.24) 8.7% (1,183,913.00) Additions (1,183,913.00)
Total (3,051,104.42) 14.3%
140
Row Labels
Sum of 2024-2025
YTD Activity
Through September
Sum of 2024-2025
Total Budget
100 2,355,497.43 12,998,292.33 18.1%
101 City Council 47,610.09 153,156.15 31.1%
110 Administration / City Manager 92,092.84 398,416.62 23.1% 111 Civic Center Facility 25,639.16 300,209.48 8.5%
150 City Attorney 39,490.41 260,000.00 15.2%
170 City Clerk 43,521.76 238,669.31 18.2%
190 Finance Administration 104,135.37 584,550.85 17.8%
191 Utility Billing 633,571.99 2,353,096.00 26.9%
201 Police Administration 276,263.27 1,231,331.47 22.4% 215 Police Patrol Services 540,824.01 2,600,082.95 20.8% 230 Animal Control 946.57 138,209.90 0.7%
310 Public Works Administration 43,547.94 342,088.35 12.7% 320 Streets 119,688.63 660,824.26 18.1%
550 Parks 187,140.16 723,198.48 25.9%
551 Recreation & Community Center 33,784.54 200,528.00 16.8% 590 Daycare Facility 2,256.87 27,580.00 8.2%
601 Building & Planning 164,983.82 1,601,688.61 10.3%
900 General Department - 1,184,661.90 0.0%
102 518,233.64 2,573,323.98 20.1%
250 Fire Department 518,233.64 2,573,323.98 20.1%
900 General Department - -
105 249,569.67 841,759.64 29.6%
105 Community Outreach 249,569.67 841,759.64 29.6%
220 1,127,090.43 4,888,656.65 23.1%
215 Police Patrol Services 791,691.34 3,070,283.48 25.8% 250 Fire Department 122,734.65 698,463.91 17.6%
551 Recreation & Community Center 142,669.18 751,728.69 19.0% 605 Code Enforcement 69,995.26 368,180.57 19.0%
Grand Total 4,250,391.17 21,302,032.60 20.0%
295,000.00
4,545,391.17 21.3%
141
295,000.00
295,000.00
295,000.00
142

DEPOSITORY MATURITY DATE INTEREST RATE DOLLAR/PAR AMOUNT MARKET VALUE State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Immediate 10,493,533 $ 10,493,533 $ Laif Interest (April to June 2024) 4.55% 163,530 $ $ 163,530 Total State of California $ 10,657,063 $ 10,657,063Wells Fargo Bank Checking Account Pool Cash Immediate $ 1,672,301 $ 1,672,301 Total Wells Fargo Bank $ 1,672,301 $ 1,672,301N/A Petty Cash General Immediate $ 1,531 $ 1,531 N/A Petty Cash Police Immediate $ 500 $ 500 Total Petty Cash $ 2,031 $ 2,031 Pro Equities Cash Balance Cash, Money Funds and Bank Deposits $ 4,185 $ 4,185 Pro Equities Money Market Dreyfus Govt Cash Mngt Inv Sh 4.77% $ 10,909 $ 10,909 Pro Equities Treasury Notes United States Treas Bills 0.00% 9/5/2024 0.00% $ 945,000 $ 927,234 Pro Equities Treasury Notes United States Treas Bills 0.00% 12/12/2024 0.00% $ 250,000 $ 247,755 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit California CR UN Glendale CALIF SH CTF 4.850% 12/27/2024 4.85% $ 244,000 $ 243,949 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit First Natl Bk Damriscotta ME CTF 0.950% 12/30/2024 0.95% $ 249,000 $ 246,662 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Medallion BK Salt Lake City Utah CTF DEP 4.500% 12/30/2024 4.50% $ 249,000 $ 248,853 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Third Fed SVGS & LN ASSN of Cleveland CTF DEP 0.900% 12/30/2024 0.90% $ 248,000 $ 245,634 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Morgan Stanley Bk NA Salt Lake City Utah Ctf Dep 1.800% 2/13/2025 1.80% $ 247,000 $ 244,379 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Morgan Stanley Private Bk Natl Assn PUR NY Ctf Dep 1.800% 2/13/2025 1.80% $ 247,000 $ 244,379 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Technology CR UN SAN JOSE CALIF SH CTF 5.000% 2/24/2025 5.00% $ 248,000 $ 248,367Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Valley Strong CR UN Bakersfield CALIF SH CTF 4.800% 6/23/2025 4.80% $ 249,000 $ 249,966 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Gesa CR UN Richland WA SH CTF 5.500% 7/31/2025 5.50% $ 248,000 $ 250,753 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Chartway Fed CR UN VA Beach VA SH CTF 5.250% 8/11/2025 5.25% $ 248,000 $ 250,401 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Townebank Portsmouth VA CTF DEP 5.050% 8/11/2025 5.05% $ 243,000 $ 244,793 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Connexus Cr UN Wausau WIS SH Ctf 3.500% 08/26/25 8/26/2025 3.50% $ 249,000 $ 247,785 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Community West CR UN Kentwood MICH CTF 4.650% 12/19/2025 4.65% $ 249,000 $ 251,169 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit First FND TN BK Irvine CA CTF DEP 4.450% 12/22/2025 4.45% $ 244,000 $ 245,447 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Security ST BK Warroad MINN CTF DEP 4.250% 12/22/2025 4.25% $ 249,000 $ 249,996 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Eaglebank Bethesda MD CTF DEP 4.400% 12/23/2025 4.40% $ 249,000 $ 250,447 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Flagstar BK NATL ASSN HICKSVILLE NEW YORK CTF DEP 4.650% 12/23/2025 4.65% $ 244,000 $ 246,120 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit First BK Hamilton New Jersey CTF DEP 4.450% 12/26/2025 4.45% $ 244,000 $ 245,552 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Cross Riv BK Teaneck N J CTF DEP 4.95% 6/18/2026 4.95% $ 243,000 $ 247,321 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Bank Amer NA Charlotte NC CTF DEP 5.05% 6/22/2026 5.05% $ 243,000 $ 247,821Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Valley Natl BK Passaic N J CTF DEP 5.05% 6/22/2026 5.05% $ 243,000 $ 247,821Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Bankers BK Madison WIS CTF DEP 4.350% 6/29/2026 4.35% $ 249,000 $ 251,179 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Synchrony Bk Retail Ctf Dep Fidelity Instl Ctf Dep 1.200% 11/30/2026 1.20% $ 248,000 $ 234,658 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Sallie Mae Bk Salt Lake City UT Ctf Dep 1.350% 12/15/2026 1.35% $ 248,000 $ 235,198 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Austin Telco Fed CR UN Tex SH CTF 4.590% 12/16/2026 4.95% $ 248,000 $ 254,051 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit All In Fed CR UN Daleville AL SH CTF 4.450% 12/21/2026 4.45% $ 249,000 $ 252,449 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit DORT FINL CR UN Grand Blanc MI SH CTF 4.400% 12/21/2026 4.40% $ 247,000 $ 250,134 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit State Bk India New York NY Ctf Dep 1.400% 12/30/2026 1.40% $ 248,000 $ 235,233 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Texas Exchange Bk Crowley Ctf Dep 1.300% 12/30/2026 1.30% $ 249,000 $ 235,596 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit First UTD BK & TR CO DURANT OK CTF DEP 4.000% 2/8/2027 4.00% $ 249,000 $ 250,121 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Latino CMNTY CR UN Durham North Carolina SH CTF 4.500% 12/21/2027 4.50% $ 249,000 $ 254,712 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Ideal CR UN Woodbury MN SH CTF 4.500% 12/29/2027 4.50% $ 249,000 $ 254,812 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit US Alliance FCU RYE New York SH CTF 4.750% 12/30/2027 4.75% $ 248,000 $ 255,693 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Liberty First CR UN LINCOLN NEB SH CTF 4.350% 2/3/2028 4.35% $ 249,000 $ 253,997 Pro Equities Certificates of Deposit Maine SVGS FCU Hampden ME SH CTF 4.800% 7/21/2028 4.80% $ 249,000 $ 259,637 Total Pro Equities $ 9,866,094 $ 9,865,167 TOTAL Cash and Investments $ 22,197,489 $ 22,196,562

CITY OF GREENFIELD
Cash & Investment Report
At September 30, 2024

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITY
143
TASKS
The below list can be adjusted/reorganized with
tasks added/removed unique to each project.

START DATE
(MM/YY)

END DATE
(MM/YY)

LEAD AGENCY
responsible for task and
contact information

NOTES/COMMENTS

1. Appraisal and Purchase Agreement (for

ACQUISITION)
1/22 12/23 City of Greenfield Complete

2. Close of escrow (for ACQUISITION) 12/23 4/24 City of Greenfield Complete

3. Schematic/concept level design with
community-based planning and ADA
(Americans with Disabilities Act) considerations
1/24 4/24 City of Greenfield Complete
4 A. Site risk assessment for possible
contaminants and other complications
1/24 4/24 City of Greenfield
4 B. Environmental cleanup/remediation 03/24 06/24 City of Greenfield

5. CEQA for the construction scope 12/23 1/24 City of Greenfield Complete

6. Project estimate Update using designs from
step 3
1/24 3/24 City of Greenfield In Progress- this step is now part of step 8.B 7A. Consultation with CONSERVATION
CORPS to consider feasibility
1/24 1/24 City of Greenfield Complete
7B. Complete Property Annexation 1/24 7/24 City of Greenfield Complete 8A. RFP Selection of Architect 1/24 4/24 Complete On July 2024 NJA Architects were selected for the Project
8B. Final Construction Documents/Designs 4/24 4/25

9. Construction Permits 4/24 8/25 City of Greenfield
10A. Other permits (Note if Department of Toxic
Substances Control, Division of the State
Architect, US Army Corps of Engineers, or other
regulatory permits as applicable to site, are
required)
4/24 8/25
City of Greenfield
10B. Project Budget and Funding Review and
Possible Council Action
4/25 5/25 City of Greenfield

11. Advertising Construction Bid Package 5/25 6/25 City of Greenfield

12.Construction Project Award at Council 6/25 7/25 City of Greenfield

13. Construction Period 8/25 4/26 City of Greenfield

14. Furnishing/ Equipment 8/25 4/26 City of Greenfield

15.Grand Opening/completed for public use
with grant completion package (three months
before the end of the GRANT PERFORMANCE
PERIOD).
4/26 9/26 City of Greenfield

16.Thirty years of operation and maintenance
for public use.
9/26 9/56 City of Greenfield

STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECT

TIMELINE- GREENFIELD COMMUNITY CENTER /PARK PROJECT
Grant Performance Period June 2021-June 2028
Between Step 14B and Step 15 City will Hire and Train Staff Prior to Grant Opening.

Complete
Complete
Submittal for permit review will happen when Designs
are in the Final Stages of completion.

City of Greenfield
City of Greenfield
Submittal for Other permits will happen when Designs
are in the Final Stages of completion.

In Progress- NJA Architects is working with Staff
on Final Designs and Final Cost Estimates
144
N

APPLE AVE
12TH STREET

SITE MASTER PLAN SCHEME
Staff and NJA Architects worked together to develop this foundational concept, using input from community workshops, which were submitted in our grant application in 2021. 145
BUILDING INFO:
16,877 SF
N

COMMUNITY CENTER
Multi Use
3D drawings and final designs are in the works.
146
MEMORANDUM: November 5, 2024
AGENDA DATE: November 12, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jamie Tugel, Public Works Director
TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2024-132, ACCEPTING YR 1 AND YR 2 OF

THE CLOSED-CIRCUIT TELEVISION (CCTV) PROJECT COMPLETED
BY PRO-PIPE, INC.

BACKGROUND:

The Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) 4- year Capital Improvement Project was awarded to Pro-Pipe, Inc. on May 9, 2023. This project is a phased project to take place over 4 fiscal years (FY 22/23 – FY 25/26).

The City of Greenfield (City) owns and operates a sanitary sewer collection system that conveys raw wastewater to the City’s WWTP and consists of approximately 31 miles of gravity pipelines ranging from 6-inches to 24-inches in diameter. The State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) and Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board) regulate spills/discharges from sanitary sewer collection systems State-wide under Waste Discharge Requirements, General Order for Sanitary Sewer Systems, Order No. 2022-0103-DWQ (recently updated from original Order 2006-0003-DWQ). This General Order mandates that agencies with one mile or more of sewer collection system prepare what is commonly known as a Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP). The City has complied with this Order, and as part of the City’s responsibility to adequately operate and maintain the City’s sewer collection system (and to minimize/prevent sewage spills), the sewer collection system must be periodically inspected to check for potential high-risk areas for potential spills. Blockages in the gravity sewer system can be caused by buildup of debris and grease, tree root intrusion, damaged sewer pipe, and other conditions. The most common way of detecting problem areas in the sewer collection system is to inspect the sewer system by CCTV.

In 2020, the City was subject to a lawsuit filed by California River Watch, an environmental interest group, Internal Revenue Code § 501(c)(3) non-profit, public benefit corporation organized under the laws of the State of California, with headquarters located in Sebastopol, California. River Watch issued the City a Notice of Violation and Intent to File Suit under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (“Clean Water Act” or “CWA”), 33 U.S.C. § 1365, (“CWA Notice Letter”). To avoid the high cost of litigation, both City Council Memorandum
599 El Camino Real Greenfield CA 93927 (831) 674-5591
www.ci.greenfield.ca.us
147
parties chose to resolve in full River Watch’s allegations in the CWA Notice Letter through a settlement agreement. In accordance with Article 2.A of the Agreement, the City agreed to conduct a Condition Assessment of the Collection System (excepting those gravity sewer lines that, at the time the Condition Assessment work is being undertaken in a given area, or have been rehabilitated, repaired, replaced, or constructed within the last ten (10) years). This assessment of the City’s sewer collection system is to be completed within 7 years of the date of this Agreement. This Agreement is dated February 2, 2021, which means the CCTV work is to be completed by February 2, 2028.

ANALYSIS
The total project budget is estimated at $858,700, which spans four fiscal years. The first year of CCTV work focused on the City’s most vulnerable sewer mains. Once the City receives the condition assessment results each year, staff will immediately evaluate and determine the course of action to be taken, following Article 2.B. of the Agreement. Article 2.B. of the Agreement guides the City on how to plan for repair and replacement of sewer mains depending upon the following condition ratings:
5 – Most significant defect
4 – Significant defect
3 – Moderate defect
2 – Minor to moderate defect
1 – Minor defect
For sewer mains that receive a rating of 5, the City shall within one (1) year of discovery, either repair, replace, or take other appropriate action with regard to that line to either divert sewage flow from the significantly defective sewer line, or abandon the same in lieu of repair or replacement, or provide Riverwatch with a schedule for repair or replacement if multiple lines need replacing. The magnitude and costs of these potential repairs or replacement is unknown at this time. Said replacements or repairs will be through a separate Capital Improvement Project that will be developed at that time.

The sewer mains cleaned and videoed in YR1 and YR2 did not have any ratings of 5 (Most Significant Defect). There were approximately 18 sewer line segments that the contractor was unable to clean and/or video due to high flows. These segments have been moved to YR3/YR4 work, which will commence in May or June 2024.

BUDGET AND FINANCIAL IMPACT:

The YR1 and YR2 project came in 21% under budget. Cost savings were attributed to the following:

1. Limiting the contract change orders, moving inaccessible segments to future years, and not utilizing all of the contingency funds.

2. A breakdown of the complete construction cost is as follows:

Services Estimated Total
Project Costs
Final Project Costs
Construction Contract YR 1 $219,050.00 $156,045.00
Project Management YR 1 $5,000.00 $4,244.52
Construction Contract YR 2 $194,000.00 $168,785.00
Project Management YR 2 $5,000.00 $4,244.53
TOTALS $ 423,050.00 $ 333,319.05
148

RECOMMENDATION
City Council adopt a Resolution accepting Year 1 and Year 2 of the Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) project completed by Pro-Pipe, Inc.

PROPOSED MOTION

I MOVE THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2024-132, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD ACCEPTING YR 1 AND YR 2 OF THE CLOSED-CIRCUIT TELEVISION (CCTV) PROJECT COMPLETED BY PRO-PIPE, INC.
:
149
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-132

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD ACCEPTING YEAR 1 AND YEAR 2 OF THE CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISTION (CCTV) PROJECT COMPLETED BY PRO-PIPE, INC.

WHEREAS, on May 9, 2023, the City Council of the City of Greenfield awarded a contract to Pro-Pipe, Inc. for the cleaning and video inspection of the City’s sewer mains over a four-year period; and WHEREAS, Year 1 and Year 2 of the project were completed back-to-back; and WHEREAS, there were no reports of level 5 condition ratings (Most Significant Defect); and WHEREAS, approximately 18 sewer main segments were not able to be cleaned due to high flows and these segments have been moved to the Year 3 and Year 4 work; and WHEREAS, the work was contracted for and completed in compliance with the State Public Contract Code, and the City’s procurement procedures set forth in section 3.12.053 of the municipal code; and
WHEREAS, all work as authorized in the Contract and subsequent change orders was inspected, corrections made as necessary and completed within the requirements of the plans and specifications of the contract; and
WHEREAS, City Staff recommend the City Council accept the work completed by Pro-Pipe, Inc.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield that:

1. The City Council hereby accepts the work completed by Pro-Pipe, Inc.; and

2. The City Manager is authorized to approve the final invoice and release of retention withheld from previous invoices submitted by Pro-Pipe, Inc.; and PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield, at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council held on the 12th day of November 2024, by the following vote:

AYES, and all in favor, therefore, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:
_______________________________
Robert White, Mayor
Attest:
___________________________
Ann F. Rathbun, City Clerk
150
MEMORANDUM: November 7, 2024
AGENDA DATE: November 12, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jamie Tugel, Public Works Director
TITLE: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GREENFIELD DECLARING THAT ZERO (0) BIDS WERE RECEIVED

AND THAT THE FIRE DEPARTMENT APPARATUS BAY DOOR

PROJECT MAY BE PROCURED ECONOMICALLY AND

SATISFACTORILY IN THE OPEN MARKET (GREENFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE § 3.12.050(6).)
BACKGROUND:

The Public Works Department released a Request for Proposal (RFP) on September 24, 2024 for Fire Department Apparatus Bay Door Replacement Project. Bids were due to the City Clerk on October 17, 2024.

The RFB was advertised on the City Webpage and multiple direct email invitations to bid were sent to various overhead door companies.

The City received zero (0) bids for this RFB. The City’s Purchasing Policy, Municipal Code §

3.12.050(6) states the following:
“Unacceptable Bids or No Bids Received: After rejecting bids, the city council may determine and declare by resolution that the equipment, supplies, materials or services may be more economically or satisfactorily purchased or secured in the open market and direct the purchase of such equipment, supplies, materials or securement of services on the open market by direct negotiations.”
Staff recommends that the City Council approve purchase on the open market of the Fire Department Apparatus Bay Doors.

BUDGET AND FINANCIAL IMPACT:

There are no budget impacts as City Council approved transfer appropriation of funds from FY 23/24 to FY 24/25 at the September 10, 2024 City Council Meeting.

City Council Memorandum
599 El Camino Real Greenfield CA 93927 (831) 674-5591
www.ci.greenfield.ca.us
151
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council adopt the proposed Resolution declaring that no bids were received, and that Fire Department Apparatus Bay Doors may be purchased economically and satisfactorily in the open market.

POTENTIAL MOTION:

I MOVE TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION #2024-133, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD DECLARING THAT ZERO (0) BIDS WERE RECEIVED AND

THAT THE FIRE DEPARTMENT APPARATUS BAY DOOR PROJECT MAY BE PROCURED

ECONOMICALLY AND SATISFACTORILY IN THE OPEN MARKET (GREENFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE § 3.12.050(6).)
152
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-133

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD DECLARING THAT ZERO (0) BIDS WERE RECEIVED AND THAT THE FIRE DEPARTMENT APPARATUS BAY

DOOR PROJECT MAY BE PROCURED ECONOMICALLY AND SATISFACTORILY IN THE OPEN MARKET (GREENFIELD MUNICIPAL CODE § 3.12.050(6))
WHEREAS, the Public Works Department released a Requests for Proposal (RFP) on September 24, 2024 for Fire Department Apparatus Bay Door Replacement Project; and WHEREAS, the RFP was advertised on the City webpage and direct email invitations to bid were sent to various overhead door companies; and
WHEREAS, Bids were due to the City Clerk on October 17, 2024; and WHEREAS, The City received zero (0) bids; and
WHEREAS, Municipal Code §3.12.050(6) states, “Unacceptable Bids or No Bids Received:

After rejecting bids, the city council may determine and declare by resolution that the equipment, supplies, materials or services may be more economically or satisfactorily purchased or secured in the open market and direct the purchase of such equipment, supplies, materials or securement of services on the open market by direct negotiations”; and WHEREAS, City Staff recommends the City Council declare that zero (0) bids were received and that the Fire Department Apparatus Bay Doors may be purchased economically and satisfactorily in the open market; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield declaring that that zero (0) bids were received and that the Fire Department Apparatus Bay Doors may be purchased economically and satisfactorily in the open market.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield, at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council held on the 12th day of November 2024, by the following vote:

AYES, and all in favor, therefore, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

Robert White, Mayor
Attest:

Ann F. Rathbun, City Clerk
153
DATE: November 1, 2024
AGENDA DATE: November 12, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
PREPARED BY: Jamie Tugel, Public Works Director
Douglas Pike, City Engineer
TITLE: A RESOLUTION AWARDING A PUBLIC WORKS
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $738,000.00
TO VSS INTERNATIONAL INC., TO CONSTRUCT THE
GREENFIELD 2024 PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE PROJECT,

BASE BID, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE THIS CONTRACT AND ASSIGN

ADDITIONAL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS
RESOLUTION. AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER, MNS

ENGINEERS INC TO PERFORM CONSTRUCTION

MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT
NOT TO EXCEED $51,600.00

BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
This project is the 3rd year of a three-year program to maintain pavement in the City of Greenfield (see attached Exhibit A).

Pavement repair in this project is similar to Year 1 and 2 Project utilizing a mix of strategies including grind & repair, rubberized chip seal, slurry seal, rejuvenation fog seal, and restriping.

The project was publicly noticed and an Invitation to Bid was issued in June 2024. One bid was received on July 18, 2024 by VSS International in the amount of $1,390,120, which exceeded the available project budget.

On September 10, 2024, Staff was directed by Council to reject the one bid and modify to break the work into a smaller “base bid” scope of work and placing other areas under “additive alternate” bid schedules. Attached Exhibit A shows the Base bid area and alternative additive areas included in the re-bid.

City Council Memorandum 599 El Camino Real Greenfield CA 93937 831-674-5591 www.ci.greenfield.ca.us
154
The project was publicly noticed and an Invitation to Bid was issued in September 2024. Two bids were received on October 17, 2024, the responsive low bidder’s base bid is within the available construction budget. The bids received and the bid amounts were as follows:

Bidder Base Bid Additive 2 Additive 3 Additive 4 Comments 1 VSS
International $738,000.00 $197,000.00 $365,000.00 $651,000.00 Apparent Low Bidder 2 Pavement
Coating Co. $949,130.00 $326,252.00 $433,350.00 $731,735.00 Staff reviewed each of the bids for conformity with the requirements of the bid documents. Based on that review, it was determined that VSS International Inc. was the lowest responsible bidder. The contract award is based on the base bid. The contract award is for the base bid only, as funding is not available to complete alternate additives.

VSS International Inc. is a General Engineering Contractor with offices in Yolo County. The firm has considerable General and Street Improvement construction experience. It holds an “A” general engineering contractor license, which requires specialized engineering knowledge and skill in areas including pavement repair, sidewalks, curb, gutter & sidewalk, and other public infrastructure work.

They have successfully performed work in the Central Coast region.

FINANCIAL AND BUDGET IMPACT
The CIP Budget for this project is $954,471.00, which is inclusive of construction, construction contingency, project management, and inspection.

The City’s proposed award is in the total amount of the base bid of $738,000. The lowest responsible bidder and bid amount is within the available construction budget.

Construction Management and inspection services will be performed by the City Engineer (MNS Engineers) at a budgeted cost not to exceed $51,600.00.

Contingency Funds are recommended in the amount of $100,700 (approx. 15%) for unexpected project delays and scope changes are within the current CIP Budget.

The City of Greenfield receives funds from various sources for the purpose of constructing transportation and pavement maintenance improvements. The funding source of the Streets Fund is the Gas Tax Funds.

A detailed breakdown of funding is as follows:

Services Funding Source Total
Construction Contract
Street Fund (Gas Tax Funds)
$738,000.00
CM & Inspection 7% $ 51,600.00
Contingency 15% $ 110,700.00
TOTAL $900,300.00
155

RECOMMENDATION
City Staff recommend the City Council adopt the proposed Resolution and award a construction contract to VSS International Inc. and authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute the construction contract for those services; and Authorize Construction Management and inspection services will be performed by the City Engineer (MNS Engineers).

PROPOSED MOTION
I MOVE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2024-134, A RESOLUTION AWARDING A PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $738,000.00 TO VSS INTERNATIONAL INC., TO CONSTRUCT THE GREENFIELD 2024

PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE PROJECT, BASE BID, AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE THIS CONTRACT AND ASSIGN

ADDITIONAL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS RESOLUTION, AUTHORIZE

THE CITY ENGINEER, MNS ENGINEERS INC TO PERFORM CONSTRUCTION

MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $51,600.00
156

EXHIBIT A
157
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-134

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD

AWARDING A PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $738,000.00 TO VSS INTERNATIONAL INC., TO CONSTRUCT THE GREENFIELD 2024 PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE PROJECT, BASE BID, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE THIS

CONTRACT AND ASSIGN ADDITIONAL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS

RESOLUTION, AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER, MNS ENGINEERS INC TO

PERFORM CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $51,600.00
WHEREAS, the City of Greenfield has funds budgeted and allocated the Gas Tax Funds for transportation and pavement improvements within the City; and WHEREAS, the City desires to contract with a responsible construction contractor for construction of the pavement improvements; and
WHEREAS, the services of the public works construction contractor must be procured utilizing a formal bidding process in compliance with the State Public Contract Code, and the City’s bidding and contracting procedures set forth in section 3.12.053 of the municipal code; and WHEREAS, to select such a public works construction contractor, the City has undertaken a formal public bidding process as required by applicable State and City public works procurement procedures; and
WHEREAS, as a result of the formal bidding process required by applicable State and City public works procurement procedures, the City Staff have identified VSS International Inc. as the lowest responsible bidder, based on the base bid; and WHEREAS, City Staff recommend the City Council award a public works construction contract to VSS International Inc., to construct the proposed improvements; and WHEREAS, City Staff recommend the City Council authorize construction management and inspection to the City Engineer, MNS Engineers, Inc.; and WHEREAS, City Staff recommend the City Council authorize construction project contingencies in the amount of 15% of the construction contract value.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield that:

1. A public works construction contract in the fixed-price amount of $738,000.00 to VSS International Inc. be awarded to provide these public works construction services for pavement improvements within the City’s currently approved budget; and

2. Authorize the amount not to exceed $51,600 for purposes of construction management and inspection services, and
158

3. Authorize the amount of $110,70000 (approximately 15%) for purposes of construction contingency due to unforeseen delays and scope changes, and

4. The City Manager is authorized to negotiate the final terms and conditions of the construction contract with VSS International Inc., authorize the inspection management from the City Engineer (MNS Engineers, Inc.), allocate contingency funds as necessary, and

5. The City Manager is authorized to execute all necessary agreements on behalf of the City of Greenfield.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield, at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council held on the 12th day of November 2024, by the following vote:

AYES, and all in favor, therefore, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:
_______________________________
Robert White, Mayor
Attest:
___________________________
Ann F. Rathbun, City Clerk
159
MEMORANDUM: November 5, 2024
AGENDA DATE: November 12, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jamie Tugel, Public Works Director
TITLE: A RESOLUTION TO RATIFY THE EMERGENCY SUSPENSION

OF NORMAL BIDDING OR PURCHASING REQUIREMENTS

RELATED TO CONSTRUCTION OF TEMPORARY,

EMERGENCY WASTEWATER DISPOSAL SPRAYFIELDS
BACKGROUND:

During an August 2024 inspection by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (Board) of the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), the Board staff noted specific, continuing, violations of the General Permit pond system specifications (freeboard, markings, and Spill Prevention and Emergency Response Plan). The Board and City staff/representatives began discussions of alternative spray disposal areas, including the City property to the East of the WWTP Pond Disposal fields.

Following the onsite discussions with the Board, further discussions ensued on the procedure in which would be required to obtain Board approval of alternative spray disposal fields on the East side of the WWTP Pond Disposal fields. This area in discussion was in the City’s original plan to add spray fields on, had commenced CEQA on the area, and the early 2023 winter storms hit California. Following these storms, in which the Salinas River rose to the existing WWTP Pond Disposal Fields eastern levee, the Board stated that they would not support spray fields in this area and that the City would need to find another location for the spray fields. Staff then focused CEQA efforts on a portion of the adjacent Sod Farm for potential future use.

City Staff prepared conceptual exhibits of the proposed temporary, emergency spray disposal fields, which were modeled after the original spray disposal field conceptual plans developed in 2022, but within a smaller area. Staff submitted an application for Addendum to Waste Discharge on September 26, 2024.

City Council Memorandum
599 El Camino Real Greenfield CA 93927 (831) 674-5591
www.ci.greenfield.ca.us
160
On October 4, 2024, the City received a revised Notice of Applicability that included the addition of temporary, emergency disposal sprayfields, and the requirements associated with the operation of the sprayfields, and immediately contacted a Class A contractor and set up a site meeting to go over the specifics of the emergency project.

DISCUSSION:

Staff met with the City Manager and provided a briefing of the situation and recommended that immediate repairs and added mitigation commence immediately and to order suspension of normal bidding or purchasing requirements in the City’s purchasing policy as the situation had become an emergency. The City Manager agreed and ordered the suspension of normal bidding or purchasing requirements in the City’s purchasing policy for this specific emergency.

Staff contacted a local engineering contractor to meet onsite and discuss the emergency construction project. The contractor is able to start immediately once approval from the City Manager was obtained.

BUDGET AND FINANCIAL IMPACT:

The project is being done via Time & Material (T&M), and a rough estimate of $350,000 has been provided. There is currently an approved CIP budget for emergency work at the WWTP of $300,000, which will be used for this project. With the final cost unknown, staff will bring back a more refined estimate to the City Council for additional appropriation.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council ratify the City Manager’s order to suspend normal bidding or purchasing requirements related to construction of temporary, emergency wastewater disposal spray fields.

POTENTIAL MOTION:

I MOVE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION #2024-135, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD TO RATIFY THE EMERGENCY

SUSPENSION OF NORMAL BIDDING OR PURCHASING REQUIREMENTS

RELATED TO CONSTRUCTION OF TEMPORARY, EMERGENCY WASTEWATER

DISPOSAL SPRAYFIELDS
161
EXHIBIT A: CONCEPTUAL SPRAY DISPOSAL FIELDS DESIGN/LOCATION Salinas River
162
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-135

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD

TO RATIFY THE EMERGENCY SUSPENSION OF NORMAL BIDDING OR

PURCHASING REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO CONSTRUCTION OF

TEMPORARY, EMERGENCY WASTEWATER DISPOSAL SPRAYFIELDS
WHEREAS, during an August 2024 inspection by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (Board) of the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), the Board staff noted specific, continuing, violations of the General Permit Pond system specifications (freeboard, markings, and Spill Prevention and Emergency Response Plan); and
WHEREAS, the Board and City staff/representatives began discussions of alternative spray disposal areas, including the City property to the East of the WWTP Pond Disposal fields; and
WHEREAS, this area in discussion was in the City’s original plan to add spray fields on, had commenced CEQA on the area, and the early 2023 winter storms hit California; and WHEREAS, following these storms, in which the Salinas River rose to the existing WWTP Pond Disposal Fields eastern levee, the Board stated that they would not support spray fields in this area and that the City would need to find another location for the spray fields; and WHEREAS, City Staff prepared conceptual exhibits of the proposed temporary, emergency spray disposal fields, which were modeled after the original spray disposal field conceptual plans developed in 2022, but within a smaller area and submitted an application for Addendum to Waste Discharge on September 26, 2024; and
WHEREAS, on October 4, 2024, the City received a revised Notice of Applicability that included the addition of temporary, emergency disposal sprayfields, and the requirements associated with the operation of the sprayfields; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager ordered the suspension normal bidding or purchasing requirement related to abatement of such emergency; and WHEREAS, the City Purchasing Policy requires the City Council to ratify the City Manager’s order to suspend normal bidding or purchasing requirement related to abatement of such emergency; and
WHEREAS, staff has a local engineering contractor on board and has commenced construction; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield does hereby ratify the emergency suspension of normal bidding or purchasing requirements related to abatement of such emergency – construction of temporary, emergency wastewater disposal sprayfields.
163
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield at a public meeting of the City Council held on the 12th day of November 2024 by the following vote:

AYES, and all in favor, therefore, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

Robert White, Mayor
Attest:

Ann F. Rathbun, City Clerk
164
MEMORANDUM: November 6, 2024
AGENDA DATE: November 12, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jamie Tugel, Public Works Director
TITLE: A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH FLUID

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (FRM) TO BE THE CONTRACT INTERIM

CHIEF PLANT OPERATOR (CPO) OF THE WASTEWATER PLANT,

INTERIM OPERATOR OF RECORD FOR THE PUBLIC WATER

SYSTEM, AND CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF
GREENFIELD FOR A PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR

BACKGROUND
In 2022, the City of Greenfield entered into two separate agreements with Fluid Resource Management (FRM) for wastewater plant management services and management of the City’s public water system. The intent was to improve plant efficiency, efficacy, and to train staff better. City Council approved multiple contract extensions for both contracts since 2022, and is currently out of contract with FRM for these services.

The City was without a Utilities Division Manager from early August 2022 thru mid-May 2024, just shy of two years. FRM was contracted in August 2022 as the City’s Certified Plant Operator (CPO) for the WWTP as well as the interim certified operator of record for the City’s Public Water System. The City on-boarded a new Utilities Division Manager in May 2024. This individual has been and continues to train on the City’s utility systems operations and maintenance as well as his management skills. He is on track to obtain the required wastewater treatment operator certification by May 2025.

FRMs duties include reviewing previous operations reading, meeting with staff to discuss the reporting portal, previous control lab tests and adjust the operation of the facility if/when necessary to ensure continued efficient operation. FRM’s compliance department will prepare the required reports for the wastewater and water systems and once approved, submit them to the appropriate regulatory agency.

BUDGET
The funding for FY 24/25 will be from the existing Wastewater division budget and Water Distribution budget and is invoiced as time and material.

The funding for FY 25/26 will be captured through the budgeting process.

City Council Memorandum 599 El Camino Real Greenfield CA 93937 831-674-5591 www.ci.greenfield.ca.us
165

PROPOSED MOTION
I MOVE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION #2024- 136, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF GREENFIELD APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH FLUID RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (FRM)

TO BE THE CONTRACT INTERIM CHIEF PLANT OPERATOR (CPO) OF THE WASTEWATER PLANT,

INTERIM OPERATOR OF RECORD FOR THE PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM, AND CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF GREENFIELD FOR A PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR 166
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-136

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD APPROVING AN

AGREEMENT WITH FLUID RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (FRM) TO BE THE CONTRACT INTERIM

CHIEF PLANT OPERATOR (CPO) OF THE WASTEWATER PLANT, INTERIM OPERATOR OF

RECORD FOR THE PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM, AND CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF GREENFIELD FOR A PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR
WHEREAS, in 2022, the City of Greenfield entered into two separate agreements with Fluid Resource Management (FRM) for wastewater plant management services and management of the City’s public water system; and
WHEREAS, the intent was to improve plant efficiency, efficacy, and to better train staff; and WHEREAS, the City was without a Utilities Division Manager from early August 2022 thru mid-May 2024, just shy of two years; and
WHEREAS, the City on-boarded a new Utilities Division Manager in May 2024. This individual has been and continues to train on the City’s utility systems operations and maintenance as well as his management skills. He is on track to obtain the required wastewater treatment operator certification by May 2025; and
WHEREAS, FRM’s duties include: contract interim chief plant operator (CPO) of the wastewater plant, interim operator of record for the public water system, and consulting services; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield that:

1. An agreement with FRM to be the contract interim chief plant operator (CPO) of the wastewater plant, interim operator of record for the public water system, and consulting services for the City of Greenfield for a period of one (1) year is approved; and

2. The City Manager is authorized to negotiate the final terms and conditions of the professional services agreement with Fluid Resource Management; and

3. The City Manager is authorized to execute all necessary agreements on behalf of the City of Greenfield.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield at a public meeting of the City Council held on the 12th day of November 2024 by the following vote:

AYES, and all in favor, therefore, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:
_________________________
Robert White, Mayor
Attest:
_______________________
Ann F. Rathbun, City Clerk
167
1 City Council Memorandum 599 El Camino Real Greenfield CA 93937 831-674-5591 www.ci.greenfield.ca.us
MEMORANDUM: 11/05/2024
AGENDA DATE: 11/12/2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Guillermo Mixer, Chief of Police
TITLE: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF GREENFIELD ACCEPTING AND
APPROPRIATING FUNDS IN FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025
IN THE AMOUNT OF $94,663.46 TO FUND

EXPENDITURES TO BE PAID FOR WITH

ENHANCING LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES

GROWTH SPECIAL ACCOUNT FUND

BACKGROUND
In 1996 the California state legislation (AB 3229) created the Citizens Options for Public Safety (COPS) program to fund the Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF), and the state also created the Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Growth Special Account for Front-Line Law Enforcement.

On October 30, 2024, the Greenfield Police Department received $94,663.46, from fiscal year 2023/2024. As stated in California Government Code Section 30061(c)2, “In the case of a city, the city council shall appropriate existing and anticipated moneys exclusively to fund frontline municipal police services, in accordance with written requests submitted by the chief of police of that city or the chief administrator of the law enforcement agency that provides services for that city.”
In addition, the funds cannot be used to supplant resources, but instead, must be used to supplement and benefit frontline law enforcement efforts, and these funds are not to be intermingled with General Fund dollars.

Staff is requesting the funds to purchase a drone, additional equipment for police vehicles, training, and improvement projects that directly benefit frontline law enforcement efforts.

The funds will be accepted and deposited into SLESF Revenue Account 200-43622.00, and transferred into the following account: 200-205-65100 Police Services. 168
2 FINANCIAL IMPACT
None, as the funds will come from the COPS / Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Growth Special Account grant fund.

PROPOSED MOTION
I MOVE TO APPROVE RESOLUTION #2024-137, A RESOLUTION OF THE

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD ACCEPTING AND
APPROPRIATING FUNDS IN FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025 IN THE AMOUNT OF $94,663.46 TO FUND EXPENDITURES TO BE PAID FOR WITH ENHANCING

LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES GROWTH SPECIAL ACCOUNT FUND
169
RESOLUTION NO. 2024 -137

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

GREENFIELD ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS IN FISCAL
YEAR 2024-2025 IN THE AMOUNT OF $94,663.46 TO FUND

EXPENDITURES TO BE PAID FOR WITH ENHANCING LAW

ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES GROWTH SPECIAL ACCOUNT FUND
WHEREAS, the California state legislature created the Citizens Option for Public Safety program and the Enhancing Law Enforcement Activities Growth Special Account for Font-line Law Enforcement; and
WHEREAS, funds are required to be placed in a special revenue fund (SLESF); and shall be allocated for expenditures listed in the City’s 2024/2025 budget; and WHEREAS, the Legislature mandated this money be spent for front line law enforcement purposes and may not be used to supplant any existing law enforcement services provided by the City or intermingled with General Fund dollars.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Greenfield to accept and appropriate $94,663.46 to the following SLESF Fund Accounts:

1. Accept into SLESF Revenue Account 200-43622.00, and transfer to SLESF Police Services 200-205-65100.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 12th day of November 2024, by the following vote:

AYES, and all in favor, therefore, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:
_______________________________
Robert White, Mayor
Attest:
_________________________
Ann F. Rathbun, City Clerk
170
MEMORANDUM: November 7, 2024
AGENDA DATE: November 12, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Paul Wood, CPA
City Manager
TITLE: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

GREENFIELD APPROVING THE DRAFT PURCHASE AND

SALE AGREEMENT AND SUPPLEMENTALLY
APPROPRIATING $138,890 FOR THE PURCHASE OF THE

PROPERTY TO BE USED FOR A NEW WATER WELL
(APN/PARCEL IDs 109-271-001, -004, -005, -006, -012 & -013) BACKGROUND:

As the City of Greenfield grows, it will from time to time be required to supply more sources of water to adequately serve its growth.

The City secured an appraisal of the Property through John W. Piini, an independent appraiser hired by the City. We have attached a copy of the Appraisal Report. The appraisal was conducted between February and July 2022. Following inspection of the Property and related due diligence into the Property’s status, the appraiser subsequently determined that the total fair market value for the Property is $138,890.00 as of June 1, 2022.

The City Council has previously authorized the offer of $138,890.00 to purchase the Property described in the attached legal descriptions, an amount based upon the fair market value of the property as set forth in the June 1, 2022, Appraisal Report. The appraisers’ expert opinion is that this sum represents just compensation for the property under applicable California law.

The current owner of the Property is J. Lohr Vineyards, Inc. and the current owner has agreed to sell the Property to the City for $138,890.00.

City Council Memorandum
599 El Camino Real Greenfield CA 93927 (831) 674-5591
www.ci.greenfield.ca.us
171
The City and the current owners will enter into a Purchase and Sale Agreement to effectuate sale of the Property upon approval of the City Council.

The property will enter into escrow in November 2024.

BUDGET AND FINANCIAL IMPACT:

The funding for the purchase of the property will be from the Water Impact Fees fund.

POTENTIAL MOTION:

I MOVE TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 2024-138, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD APPROVING THE DRAFT PRUCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND SUPPLEMENTALLY APPROPRIATING $138,890

FOR THE PURCHASE OF THE PROPERTY TO BE USED FOR A NEW WATER WELL (APN/PARCEL IDs 109-271-001, -004, -005, -006, -012 & -013). 172
RESOLUTION 2024-138

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD APPROVING THE

DRAFT PRUCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND SUPPLEMENTALLY APPROPRIATING $138,890 FOR THE PURCHASE OF THE PROPERTY TO BE USED FOR A NEW WATER WELL (APN/PARCEL IDs 109-271-001, -004, -005, -006, -012 & -013) WHEREAS, as the City of Greenfield grows, it will from time to time be required to supply more sources of water to adequately serve its growth; and WHEREAS, the City secured an appraisal of the property and the appraisal was conducted between February and July 2022 and the appraiser subsequently determined that the total fair market value for the property is $138,890.00 as of June 1, 2022; and WHEREAS, the current owner of the property is J. Lohr Vineyards, Inc. and the current owner has agreed to sell the property to the City for $138,890.00.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Greenfield authorizes the City Manager to enter into a purchase and sale agreement, Exhibit “A” for sale of the property.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield at a regularly scheduled meeting duly held on the 12th day of November 2024 by the following vote:

AYES, and all in favor, thereof, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:
________________________________________
Robert White, Mayor of the City of Greenfield
Attest:
________________________
Ann F. Rathbun, City Clerk

173
1 ______________________________________________________________

REAL PROPERTY PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT

AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS
______________________________________________________________ The City of Greenfield, a municipal corporation, (“Buyer”); and J. Lohr Vineyards, Inc., a California Corporation (“Seller”), enter into this Agreement, effective as of the date that the parties both execute it.

RECITALS
A. The Buyer desires to acquire Seller’s property for public uses and purposes consisting of two (2) City water wells.

B. The Seller owns certain real property consisting of portions of Monterey County Assessor Parcel Numbers 109-271-001, -004, -005, -006, -012, & -013 (“Property”), and is more particularly described and depicted in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto (the “Property”).

C. The Property will require three (3) access easements as particularly described and depicted in Exhibit “B”, attached hereto (“Easements”).

C. The parties have agreed to the purchase and sale of the Property and Easements on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

AGREEMENT

1. Purchase and sale. Seller will sell the Property to Buyer, and Buyer will purchase the Property from Seller.

2. Access easement. Seller shall convey the Easements to Buyer, and Buyer will purchase the Easements from seller.

3. Condition precedent. Escrow Closing and Buyer’s obligation to purchase the Property are subject to the satisfaction of the following condition precedent before the close of escrow. The condition is solely for Buyer’s benefit, unless otherwise indicated. The condition must be fulfilled to Buyer’s satisfaction or Buyer must waive it in writing within the time provided. If no time is stated, then the condition must be satisfied within a reasonable time before the close of escrow. If the conditions below are not timely satisfied, the Buyer may waive the condition and close escrow, or it may terminate this Agreement by giving the Seller and Title Company ten (10) days’ written notice. After expiration of the ten (10) days, following the due diligence period, this Agreement, and any escrow, will terminate.

The Title Company will return any documents and any money deposited into escrow to the depositor, after deducting any escrow cancellation fees, and Buyer will have no further obligation to Seller.
174
2 3.1 Buyer’s right to enter property. For a period up to one hundred and twenty (120) days from the date hereof (the “Due Diligence Period”), Seller grants Buyer, or Buyer’s agents, the right, upon forty-eight (48) hours’ notice, to enter onto the Property and Easements to conduct tests or investigations, in order to prepare to construct the public project and to determine the existence of any substance, condition, or circumstance in or on the Property that makes it infeasible for Buyer’s purposes. The right of entry is granted subject to the following conditions:
(a) Buyer conducts tests or investigations at its sole cost and expense; (b) The tests or investigations do not unreasonably interfere with Seller’s possession;
(c) Buyer shall give Seller forty-eight (48) hours’ written notice prior to any physically intrusive investigations of the Property, such as sampling of soils, ground water tests, other media, building materials, or the like, and Buyer will identify in writing exactly what procedures Buyer desires to perform. Buyer and its representatives performing such investigations shall, in performing such investigations, comply with the agreed upon procedures and with any and all laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations applicable to the Property and will not engage in any activities which would violate any permit, license, or environmental law or regulation; and
(d) Buyer shall indemnify, defend with counsel reasonably acceptable to Seller, and hold Seller harmless from all claims (including claims of lien for work or labor performed or materials or supplies furnished), demands, liabilities, losses, damages, costs, fees, and expenses, including Seller’s reasonable attorney fees, costs, and expenses, arising from the acts or activities of Buyer or Buyer’s representatives in, on, or about the Property during or arising in connection with Buyer’s inspections of the Property. Buyer shall maintain and shall cause each Buyer’s representative entering onto the Property to perform physical inspections or environmental investigations to maintain a policy or policies of commercial general liability insurance insuring against claims and liabilities arising directly from or related to acts, omissions, or investigations of Buyer and Buyer’s Parties in, on, or about the Property. Such insurance shall have limits of not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000.00). Buyer shall deliver insurance certificates to Seller prior to any entry onto the Property by Buyer or any of Buyer’s parties.

4. Purchase price. The purchase price for the Property shall be one hundred thirty-eight thousand eight hundred ninety dollars ($138,890.00) as determined by a written appraisal.

The written appraisal from Piini Realty, which determines the fair market value for the Property and Easements, is included in Exhibit “C.”

5. Eminent domain. Seller acknowledges that the Buyer has the power, subject to legal 175
3 requirements, to acquire the Property by eminent domain. Buyer and Seller stipulate that the purchase price payable to Seller includes any and all compensation to which Seller would be entitled under chapter 9 of the California Eminent Domain Law (Code of Civil Procedure sections 1263.010, et. seq.) or otherwise, connected with or arising out of the following: (a) Buyer’s acquisition of the Property, and (b) any pre-condemnation or preacquisition activities of Buyer (and any officer, agent, contractor, or employee of Buyer). “Compensation” as used in the preceding sentence includes, without limitation, any claims that Seller may have for the following: improvements, crops, fair market value of the Property, injury to remainder property, loss of goodwill, inverse condemnation, interference with or interruption of business, loss of rents in connection with relocation activities, or any other claims, losses, or damages. Buyer may file this Agreement with the Court as a stipulation upon which the Court may enter judgment in any eminent domain proceeding for the Property. Seller waives all defenses and the right to seek any additional compensation in any eminent domain proceeding for the Property. This stipulation will survive the Closing and any expiration or termination of this Agreement.

6. Seller’s warranties. Seller represents and warrants that: (a) Seller owns the Property and Easements properties, free and clear of all liens, licenses, claims, encumbrances, easements, encroachments on the Property from adjacent properties, encroachments from the Property onto adjacent properties, and any rights of way, other than those disclosed by the public record; (b) Seller has no knowledge of any pending litigation involving the Property or Easements properties; (c) Seller has no knowledge of any violations of, or notices concerning defects or noncompliance with, any code, statute, regulation, ordinance, judicial order, or judicial holding concerning the Property or Easements properties; (d) Seller has no knowledge of any hazardous materials or substances stored, discharged, or otherwise present in, on, or affecting the Property or Easement properties; and (e) Seller has no knowledge of any material defects in the Property or Easements properties which would interfere with Buyer’s use of the Property for water wells. These warranties shall survive the Closing and the recording of the grant deed.

As used in this Agreement, the phrase “Seller’s knowledge” shall be limited to the actual knowledge of J. Lohr Vineyards, Inc. without duty of inquiry or investigation into the matter so qualified. “Seller’s knowledge” shall not be construed to refer to the knowledge of any other agent or employee or principal of Seller.

7. Property occupation. Seller shall not rent, re-rent, or otherwise permit any occupation on the Property before closing and after Seller executes this Agreement and/or the City relocates Seller or any occupants from the Property as provided by law.

8. Opening escrow. Within five (5) days after signing this Agreement, the parties will deposit this Agreement in escrow with Chicago Title Company, 50 Winham Street, Salinas, CA, 93901, escrow no. [ESCROW NUMBER] (attn: [TITLE COMPANY CONTACT NAME]).

8.1 Agreement as joint escrow instructions. This Agreement, when signed by both parties and deposited with the Title Company, will be the joint escrow 176
4 instructions of both. Buyer and Seller will sign any other form instructions required by Title Company.

8.2 Deposits into escrow. Buyer and Seller will deposit all instruments, documents, money, and other items with the Title Company that are: (i) identified in this Agreement; and/or (ii) required by the Title Company to affect the Closing on the date specified below. Seller will deposit a recordable grant deed and recordable Easements deed into the escrow within five (5) days after the execution of this Agreement. Buyer will deposit five hundred dollars ($500.00) into escrow as a good faith deposit to be applied to the purchase price, within five (5) days after the execution of this Agreement. The good faith deposit shall be returned and refunded to Buyer if escrow does not close due to failure of the condition precedent set forth in section 3 or if escrow does not close after satisfaction of the condition precedent set forth in section 3 due to default of Seller. In the event that the condition precedent set forth in section 3 is satisfied, and escrow does not close due to default of Buyer, Seller shall have all remedies available under California law (including but not limited to the right to damages and the right to specific performance).

8.3 Title. Seller will convey title of the Property to Buyer free and clear of all title defects, liens, encumbrances, conditions, covenants, restrictions, and other adverse interests of record or known to Seller, subject only to title exceptions which are approved in writing by Buyer. Such approval shall be made prior to the end of the due diligence period under section 3.1.

8.4 Title and closing costs. Buyer will pay any costs of clearing and conveying the title in the condition described in section 8.3, above. Buyer will pay the costs of a CLTA title policy insuring Buyer’s title in the condition described in section 8.3.

Buyer and Seller will split between them all other title and escrow costs, as per Monterey County custom.

8.5 Closing. The escrow will be considered closed (“Closing” or “Close” or the “Closing Date”) on the date that the Title Company records the grant deed. It is the parties’ desire and interest to Close escrow on or before [DATE]. The escrow will be in condition to Close when any conditions to Close are satisfied or waived, the Title Company is prepared to issue the title policy described herein, and the Title Company is otherwise able to record the grant deed. Subject to the provisions of section 3, the escrow will continue in effect until Closing, unless Buyer or Seller gives a ten (10) day written demand to terminate the escrow. If Seller demands that escrow terminate, then Buyer, within the thirty (30) days, may either (a) deposit the purchase price into escrow, and Title Company will Close escrow, or (b) agree to the demand, and the Title Company will terminate the escrow and return all funds or all documents, less any termination fee, and this Agreement will be of no further effect except as herein provided.

8.6 Disbursements. At Closing, Title Company will disburse the purchase price 177
5 when Title Company is prepared to issue a standard CLTA owners title insurance policy to Buyer, insuring its fee title in the condition set forth in section 8.3, above, for the purchase price.

8.7 Prorations. The Title Company will prorate the real property taxes to the Closing, and the Seller will be responsible for and pay all real property taxes which are due through the Closing Date.

8.8 Risk of loss. Any loss or damage to the Property, or any improvements on it, before Closing, is at Seller’s risk.

8.9 No broker or agent. Neither party has had any contact or dealings regarding the Property, or any communication in connection with the subject matter of this transaction, through any licensed real estate broker or person, who can claim a commission or finder’s fee as a procuring cause of the sale contemplated in this Agreement. If any broker or finder perfects a claim for a commission or finder’s fee based on any contract, dealings, or communication with a party (“Indemnifying Party”), then the Indemnifying Party shall indemnify, defend, and hold the other party (“Non-Indemnifying Party”) harmless from all costs and expenses (including reasonable attorney fees and costs of defense) incurred by the Non-Indemnifying Party in connection with such claim.

9. Delivery of possession. Seller shall deliver possession of Property at Closing, subject to Buyer’s responsibilities under applicable law to relocate any occupants.

10. Miscellaneous provisions.

10.1 Further assurances. Each party will sign and deliver further documents or take any further actions required to complete the purchase and sale described herein.

10.2 Notices. All notices and other communications required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and duly given on the date of service, if: (a) served personally on the person to receive the notice; (b) delivered by depositing the notice or communication in the U. S. mail, postage prepaid, and addressed to the relevant party at the address set forth below; or (c) by facsimile that provides a transmission confirmation showing the date and time transmitted.

To Seller:

Jerome J. Lohr
2021 The Alameda, Ste. 145
San Jose, CA 95126
To Buyer:

City of Greenfield
Attn: Paul Wood, City Manager
P.O. Box 127
Greenfield, California 93927
178
6 Phone: (831) 674-5591
Fax: (831) 674-3149
Cc:

Jennifer Thompson
Lozano Smith, Attorneys at Law
733 Marsh Street, Suite 200
San Luis Obispo, California 93401
Phone: (805) 788-9620

10.3 Entire agreement. Each Exhibit referred to in this Agreement is by that reference incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement. This Agreement is the entire agreement between the parties regarding the purchase and sale of the Property, and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, commitments, or understanding, written or oral.

10.4 Amendment or cancellation. Buyer and Seller may amend or cancel this Agreement only by mutual written consent of the parties, unless otherwise expressly provided herein.

10.5 Successors and assigns. This Agreement is binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of each party, and each party’s heirs, successors, assigns, transferees, agents, employees, or representatives. The Buyer may assign this Agreement and its rights hereunder.

10.6 Time of the essence. Time is of the essence of each term in this Agreement.

10.7 Attorneys’ fees. If either party or the Title Company begins any action, proceeding, or arbitration arising out of this Agreement, then as between Buyer and Seller, the prevailing party shall be entitled to receive from the other party, besides any other relief that may be granted, its reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses incurred in the action, proceeding, or arbitration.

10.8 Governing law. This Agreement and the legal relations between the parties shall be governed by and construed according to California law. Venue for the filing of any action to enforce or interpret this Agreement or any rights and duties hereunder shall be in Monterey County, California.

10.9 Headings. The section headings in this Agreement are for convenience only.

They are not part of this Agreement and shall not be used to construe it.

10.10 Waiver. Any party’s waiver of a breach of any provision herein will not be a continuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach of that or any other provision of this Agreement.

10.11 Severability. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. The invalidity or 179
7 unenforceability of any provision in this Agreement will not affect the other provisions.

10.12 Interpretation. This Agreement is the result of the combined efforts of the parties. If any provision of this Agreement is found ambiguous, the ambiguity will not be resolved by construing this Agreement in favor or against any party, but by construing the terms according to their generally accepted meaning.

10.13 Precedence of documents. If any conflict exists between the body of this Agreement and any Exhibit or Attachment to it, the provisions of the body of this Agreement will control and take precedence over the Exhibit or Attachment.

10.14 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which, when executed and delivered, will be deemed an original, and all of which together will constitute one instrument.

10.15 Survival. All representations and warranties, indemnifications, and other provisions which, by their nature are intended to continue, shall survive Closing and delivery of the grant deed.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Seller and Buyer have signed this Agreement on the dates and in the year set forth below.

BUYER: SELLER:

CITY OF GREENFIELD J. Lohr Vineyards, Inc.

By: ________________________________ By: ________________________________ Robert White, Mayor Jerome J. Lohr, CEO/CFO
Dated: , 2024 Dated: , 2024

The City of Greenfield has signed this Agreement pursuant to authority granted by the City Council of the City of Greenfield on ___________, 2024. 180
8 EXHIBIT A: PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
[INSERT LEGAL DESCRIPTION]
181
9 EXHIBIT B: EASEMENTS LEGAL DESCRIPTION
[INSERT LEGAL DESCRIPTION]
182
10 EXHIBIT C: APPRAISAL
183

Recording Requested by:

CITY OF GREENFIELD
When Recorded Mail to:

City Clerk - City of Greenfield
599 EL CAMINO REAL
P.O. BOX 127
GREENFIELD, CA 93927
No Fee Per Government Code 6103 APN: 109-271-001

GRANT DEED
(ACCESS EASEMENT)
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, [NAME] (“Owner” or “Owners”) hereby GRANTS to the CITY OF GREENFIELD, a municipal corporation, (“City”) an easement for access to City owned real property. The easement is depicted and described in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.

Owner hereby covenants and agrees not to place or construct, nor allow a third party to place or construct, any fences, walls, other barriers, any building or other structure that will interfere with access to City owned real property, which is depicted and described in Exhibit “B,” attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein (“City Owned Property”). City shall, from time-to-time, be permitted but not required to maintain any road, whether improved or unimproved, to ensure City’s ability to access the City Owned Property.

The rights and obligations of the Owner and City hereunder shall constitute covenants, benefits, and burdens which run with the land, and which shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the successors and assigns of the Owner and City as the owners of the respective Property. Owner and City, but not their respective transferees, shall, from and after the transfer of all or a portion of the Property, be released from all obligations hereunder, which accrue with respect to the Property after the date of such transfer. //
//
//
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor has executed this instrument this ________ day of ________________, 20___.

By: _______________________________
[NAME]

184
Notary
STATE OF ___________________
COUNTY OF _________________
On this _____ day of ___________, 20___, before me, _____________________, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared
_______________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledge to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the person(s) or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY, under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

Witness my hand and official seal:

Signature: ____________________________________
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
185

EXHIBIT “A”
Legal Descriptions and Maps
Access Easements
APN: 109-271-001

186

EXHIBIT “B”
City Owned Property Legal Descriptions and Maps
APN: 109-271-001
187

CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE

AND CONSENT TO RECORDATION OF

EASEMENT GRANT DEED
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the Easement Grant Deed dated _______________________ from [NAME] (“Owner” or “Owners”) to the City of Greenfield, a municipal corporation of the State of California, is hereby accepted by the undersigned City Clerk on behalf of the City Council, pursuant to the action of the City Council at its meeting of __________________________ and the grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.

Dated: __________________________
City of Greenfield:

By: _____________________________
Ann Rathbun
City Clerk
188
Recording Requested by:

CITY OF GREENFIELD
When Recorded Mail to:

City Clerk - City of Greenfield
599 EL CAMINO REAL
P.O. BOX 127
GREENFIELD, CA 93927
No Fee Per Government Code 6103 APN: 109-271-003

GRANT DEED
(ACCESS EASEMENT)
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, [NAME] (“Owner” or “Owners”) hereby GRANTS to the CITY OF GREENFIELD, a municipal corporation, (“City”) an easement for access to City owned real property. The easement is depicted and described in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.

Owner hereby covenants and agrees not to place or construct, nor allow a third party to place or construct, any fences, walls, other barriers, any building or other structure that will interfere with access to City owned real property, which is depicted and described in Exhibit “B,” attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein (“City Owned Property”). City shall, from time-to-time, be permitted but not required to maintain any road, whether improved or unimproved, to ensure City’s ability to access the City Owned Property.

The rights and obligations of the Owner and City hereunder shall constitute covenants, benefits, and burdens which run with the land, and which shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the successors and assigns of the Owner and City as the owners of the respective Property. Owner and City, but not their respective transferees, shall, from and after the transfer of all or a portion of the Property, be released from all obligations hereunder, which accrue with respect to the Property after the date of such transfer. //
//
//
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor has executed this instrument this ________ day of ________________, 20___.

By: _______________________________
[NAME]
189

Notary
STATE OF ___________________

COUNTY OF _________________
On this _____ day of ___________, 20___, before me, _____________________, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared
_______________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledge to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the person(s) or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY, under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

Witness my hand and official seal:

Signature: ____________________________________
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
190
EXHIBIT “A”
Legal Descriptions and Maps
Access Easements
APN: 109-271-003
191

EXHIBIT “B”
City Owned Property Legal Descriptions and Maps
APN: 109-271-003
192

CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE

AND CONSENT TO RECORDATION OF

EASEMENT GRANT DEED
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the Easement Grant Deed dated _______________________ from [NAME] (“Owner” or “Owners”) to the City of Greenfield, a municipal corporation of the State of California, is hereby accepted by the undersigned City Clerk on behalf of the City Council, pursuant to the action of the City Council at its meeting of __________________________ and the grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.

Dated: __________________________
City of Greenfield:
by _____________________________
Ann Rathbun
City Clerk
193

Recording Requested by:

CITY OF GREENFIELD
When Recorded Mail to:

City Clerk - City of Greenfield
599 EL CAMINO REAL
P.O. BOX 127
GREENFIELD, CA 93927
No Fee Per Government Code 6103 APN: 109-271-012

GRANT DEED
(ACCESS EASEMENT)
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, [NAME] (“Owner” or “Owners”) hereby GRANTS to the CITY OF GREENFIELD, a municipal corporation, (“City”) an easement for access to City owned real property. The easement is depicted and described in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.

Owner hereby covenants and agrees not to place or construct, nor allow a third party to place or construct, any fences, walls, other barriers, any building or other structure that will interfere with access to City owned real property, which is depicted and described in Exhibit “B,” attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein (“City Owned Property”). City shall, from time-to-time, be permitted but not required to maintain any road, whether improved or unimproved, to ensure City’s ability to access the City Owned Property.

The rights and obligations of the Owner and City hereunder shall constitute covenants, benefits, and burdens which run with the land, and which shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the successors and assigns of the Owner and City as the owners of the respective Property. Owner and City, but not their respective transferees, shall, from and after the transfer of all or a portion of the Property, be released from all obligations hereunder, which accrue with respect to the Property after the date of such transfer. //
//
//
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor has executed this instrument this ________ day of ________________, 20___.

By: _______________________________
[NAME]

194

Notary
STATE OF ___________________

COUNTY OF _________________
On this _____ day of ___________, 20___, before me, _____________________, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared
_______________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledge to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the person(s) or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY, under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

Witness my hand and official seal:

Signature: ____________________________________
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
195
EXHIBIT “A”
Legal Descriptions and Maps
Access Easements
APN: 109-271-012
196

EXHIBIT “B”
City Owned Property Legal Descriptions and Maps
APN: 109-271-012
197

CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE

AND CONSENT TO RECORDATION OF

EASEMENT GRANT DEED
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the Easement Grant Deed dated _______________________ from [NAME] (“Owner” or “Owners”) to the City of Greenfield, a municipal corporation of the State of California, is hereby accepted by the undersigned City Clerk on behalf of the City Council, pursuant to the action of the City Council at its meeting of __________________________ and the grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.

Dated: __________________________
City of Greenfield:

By: _____________________________
Ann Rathbun
City Clerk
198
f
MEMORANDUM: November 5, 2024
AGENDA DATE: November 12, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Paul Wood, City Manager
TITLE: DISCUSSION RELATED TO PROPOSAL TO PERFORM

ADA INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS IN PARKS

AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES
BACKGROUND:

ADA Compliance for Recreational Facilities and Parks
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a piece of legislation that aims to eliminate discrimination against individuals with disabilities and ensure equal opportunities for them in all areas of public life. Since its enactment in 1990, the ADA has set forth comprehensive guidelines for businesses, public entities, and private sectors to follow to accommodate the needs of people with disabilities. When it comes to recreational facilities and parks, ADA compliance is especially vital as it ensures that everyone, regardless of their physical abilities, can enjoy natural and recreational resources.

Introduction to ADA Compliance
ADA compliance is a legal requirement to create a more inclusive society. Recreational facilities and parks provide essential recreational, social, and health benefits for individuals and communities. Ensuring these spaces are accessible to everyone mandates the removal of physical barriers and implementation of specific design features that accommodate individuals with disabilities. ADA-compliant amenities include accessible paths, restrooms, parking, playgrounds, and more.

Understanding the fundamentals of ADA compliance requires familiarity with the ADA Standards for Accessible Design. These standards establish the minimum requirements for newly designed and newly constructed or altered public facilities. Recreational managers, city planners, City Council Memorandum 599 El Camino Real Greenfield CA 93937 831-674-5591 www.ci.greenfield.ca.us
199
architects, and other stakeholders must ensure that their facilities meet these standards to promote equality and prevent discrimination.

Key Standards and Requirements
One of the key standards set by the ADA for recreational facilities includes the need for accessible routes and entrances. These routes provide access to different areas of the park and should be designed to accommodate wheelchairs, scooters, and other mobility devices. Curb ramps, pedestrian crossings, and pathways must meet certain slope, width, and surface texture requirements to ensure ease of movement. Furthermore, entrances to buildings and key areas such as pavilions and restrooms within the park should be equipped with automatic doors or be wide enough for wheelchair access.

Another critical component of ADA compliance is accessible parking. Designated parking spots for individuals with disabilities must be conveniently located near entrance routes and be sufficiently wide to accommodate wheelchair users. These spots should be marked with appropriate signage to indicate availability for disabled visitors.

Seating areas, whether in pavilions, picnic areas, or stadiums, also must adhere to ADA standards. This includes ensuring that a certain percentage of seats in any given area are accessible, providing clear sightlines for wheelchair users and distributing accessible seating areas evenly throughout the facility for inclusivity.

Playgrounds and Recreational Spaces
Playgrounds are fundamental recreational spaces for children and emphasizing their accessibility is crucial. ADA-compliant playgrounds feature equipment that is usable by children with various disabilities, including those with mobility impairments, sensory disorders, or developmental disabilities. Ground-level play components like swings, slides, and sandboxes must be accessible and designed for easy use.

Moreover, playground surfaces should be firm, stable, and made of materials that allow for wheelchair movement. Rubberized surfaces or engineered wood fibers are common choices that meet ADA standards. Additionally, ramps and transfer platforms can offer access to elevated play structures, ensuring that children with disabilities can engage in the same play activities as their peers.

Other recreational spaces in parks, such as sports fields, pools, and trails, should also be accessible. Sports fields may need appropriately designed bleachers, while pools should have lifts or sloped entries for those with mobility impairments. Trails should have smooth and stable surfaces, with signage to indicate accessibility features and challenges.

Restrooms and Facilities
200
Accessible restrooms are a paramount aspect of ADA compliance in recreational facilities. These restrooms should have enough space to accommodate a wheelchair user and provide features such as grab bars, low-mounted sinks, and hand dryers that are easy to reach. Unisex or family restrooms can provide additional privacy and support for visitors with caregivers.

Other facilities like drinking fountains, picnic areas, and information centers should also follow ADA guidelines. Drinking fountains must have spouts at a height that wheelchair users can access easily and be operable with one hand. Picnic tables should have spaces for individuals using wheelchairs to sit comfortably and participate in activities.

Ensuring accessibility in all facilities helps create an inclusive environment where visitors with disabilities feel welcomed and can enjoy the amenities the park has to offer.

Staff Training and Awareness
A critical component of ADA compliance is ensuring that staff and volunteers are aware of accessibility needs and trained to assist visitors with disabilities. Staff members should be knowledgeable about the accessible features of the facility and be prepared to offer assistance when needed. Regular training sessions can help familiarize staff with disability etiquette and best practices in providing respectful and effective service.

Additionally, staff should be trained to handle emergency situations, ensuring that individuals with disabilities can safely and swiftly evacuate or receive aid during unforeseen events.

Emergency preparedness plans should include specific procedures for accommodating and evacuating individuals with disabilities from the facility or park.

Creating a welcoming atmosphere goes beyond physical modifications and relies heavily on the behavior and attitudes of the facility’s personnel. Through comprehensive training and a commitment to inclusivity, facilities can enhance the experiences of all visitors and foster a supportive and accommodating environment.

Challenges and Solutions
Implementing ADA compliance in recreational facilities and parks can come with its set of challenges. Budget constraints often pose a significant hurdle in retrofitting existing structures to meet accessibility standards. However, grants and funding opportunities are available to support such important initiatives.

Maintaining compliance is an ongoing process that involves regular assessments and updates to facilities. Changes in ADA guidelines may necessitate new modifications, and it’s essential to stay informed and proactive about implementing these changes. Conducting accessibility audits can help identify areas needing improvement and ensure that facilities remain compliant with current standards.
201
It’s essential to engage with the community and receive feedback from individuals with disabilities. Their input can provide valuable insight into how facilities can be improved and serve as a reminder of the importance of maintaining compliance. By continuously striving to meet and exceed ADA standards, we can ensure that recreational facilities and parks remain welcoming spaces for everyone.

Some city governments may believe that their existing programs and facilities are protected by a “grandfather” clause from having to comply with the requirements of Title II of the ADA. This is not correct.

Because of this, they fail to take steps to provide program access or to make modifications to policies, practices, and procedures that are required by law. People with disabilities are unable to gain access to city facilities, programs, services, or activities because of a public entity’s reliance on these common misconceptions.

Having said all this, the law is flexible. City governments must comply with Title II of the ADA and must provide program access for people with disabilities to the whole range of city services and programs, including parks. In providing program access city governments are not required to take any action that would result in a fundamental alteration to the nature of the service, program, or activity in question or that would result in undue financial and administrative burdens. This determination can only be made by the head of the public entity or a designee and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. The determination that undue burden would result must be based on all resources available for use in a program. If an action would result in such an alteration or such burdens, a city government must take any other action that it can to ensure that people with disabilities receive the benefits and services of the program or activity. 28 C.F.R. § 35.150(a)(3).

COUNCIL ACTION
Provide direction to staff about if and how to move forward related to the following:

1. Would the Council like staff to pursue updating of any kind related to ADA implementation in city parks?

2. How much is the Council willing to invest in updating? Or how long of a time allotted to get project complete?

3. How to proceed from here?
a. Obtain outside consultant assessment of needs to maintain compliance with ADA, b. Talk with local members of disabled community to find out their wants/needs c. other
202

← All documents from this meeting