Cities Index.
Agenda

Greenfield City Council
March 11, 2025

Document
Agenda
Meeting
March 11, 2025
Body
Greenfield City Council
Pages
273
Original file
6.5 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on www.greenfieldca.gov. That file is the official record.

City of Greenfield
599 El Camino Real
Greenfield, CA 93927
City Council Meeting Agenda
March 11, 2025
6:00 P.M.

Mayor Robert White
Mayor Pro-tem Ariana Rodriguez
Councilmembers
Rachel Ortiz
Marcy Jones
Belen Garcia
The Greenfield City Council meeting on March 11, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. will be held in the City Council Chambers located at 599 El Camino Real, Greenfield, California 93927, and will be open to the public. This meeting will also be accessible online and may be viewed through the following options:

Facebook Live: https://www.facebook.com/GreenfieldCA/
Join Zoom Meeting: http://meeting.ci.greenfield.ca.us
Meeting ID: 844 8164 8935
PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES.

A. CALL TO ORDER
B. ROLL CALL – CITY COUNCIL
C. EXCUSE COUNCILMEMBER ABSENCES
City Council Agenda
March 11, 2025

Page 2 ends

This agenda item allows the City Council to excuse the absence of Councilmembers not present at the meeting. If all Councilmembers are present, this agenda will be skipped. a. Public Comments
b. City Council Comments / Action
D. INVOCATION BY PASTOR RAMIRO LUGO
E. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
F. AGENDA REVIEW
G. PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
This portion of the agenda allows an individual the opportunity to address the Council on any items not on the Closed Session, Consent Calendar, Public Hearings, and City Council Business. Under state regulations, no action can be taken on non-agenda items, including issues raised under this agenda item. Members of the public should be aware of this when addressing the Council regarding items not specifically referenced on this Agenda.

PLEASE NOTE: Public comments may be made in the following formats: in person, through Zoom, or by email. If you wish to make a public comment through Zoom, please use the “raise your hand” feature during the public comment section. You will be selected by the meeting host and will be allowed to say your comment aloud. If you wish to make a public comment through email, please submit your public comment to [email protected]. In the email subject line, please write your name and the agenda item or topic you are commenting on. If you wish to submit a public comment on more than one agenda item or topic, please send a separate email for each agenda item or topic you are commenting. All public comments submitted through email must be received no later than 12:00 p.m. (noon) on March 10, 2025. Comments submitted through email on time will be incorporated into the City Council Agenda and made part of the record for the meeting. Comments submitted by email that are not received on time will not be accepted. Public comments submitted by email will not be read aloud during the meeting. Please be aware that written public comments, including your name, may become public information.

H. COMMENTS FROM CITY COUNCIL
I. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered routine and may be approved by one action of the City Council, unless a request for removal for discussion or explanation is received prior to the time Council votes on the motion to adopt. a. Public Comments
I-1. APPROVE Warrants #323945 through #324047 and Bank Drafts #6499 through #6527 in the amount of $588,763.05 – Page 1
I-2. APPROVE Minutes of the February 28, 2025 City Council Meeting – Page 22 I-3. RECEIVE AND FILE – Monthly Report – Economic and Community Development Department – Page 29
City Council Agenda
March 11, 2025

Page 3 ends

I-4. ADOPT Resolution #2025-15, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Accepting the Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Grant and Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into an Agreement with the State of California – Page 30 J. MAYOR’S PRESENTATION, PROCLAMATIONS, COMMUNICATIONS, RESOLUTIONS J-1. PROCLAMTION – A Proclamation of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Proclaiming March 2025 as American Red Cross Month – Page 70 J-2. PRESENTATION – ITN MontereyCounty – ValleyLine Transportation for Seniors and Visually Impaired Individuals in the Salinas Valley
J-3. PRESENTATION – 2022-2023 Audited Financial Statements by Michael Sparling, Harshwal & Company LLP – Page 71
J-4. PRESENTATION - Greenfield Parks Accessibility & Inclusion Presentation K. PUBLIC HEARING
K-1. ADOPT A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Adopting the 2020 Urban Water Management Plan – Page 177
a. Staff Report
b. Open Public Hearing
c. Close Public Hearing
d. City Council Comments / Review / Action
Staff Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution #2025-16
L. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
L-1. ADOPT A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Approving a Reimbursement Resolution to Submit to the State Clean Water State Revolving Fund for Potential Loans for the Construction of the New Wastewater Treatment Plant –

Page 273 ends

a. Staff Report
b. Public Comments
c. City Council Comments / Review / Action
Staff Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution #2025-17
L-2. ADOPT A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Approving a Appropriation of $____ as a Reward for the Successful Arrest and Conviction of those Responsible for the Hit and Run Incident of February 14, 2025 on 13th Street at Walnut Avenue – Page 277
a. Staff Report
b. Public Comments
c. City Council Comments / Review / Action
Staff Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution #2025-18
City Council Agenda
March 11, 2025

Page 4 ends

M. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
M-1. CLOSED SESSION - GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Agency designated representative: City Manager Paul Wood Employee Organizations: Service Employee’s International Union Local 521, International Union of Operating Engineers Local #3, Professional Firefighters International Association of Fire Fighters Local 4656
a. Public Comments
N. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION
O. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
P. CITY MANAGER REPORT
Q. ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (831) 674-5591. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the meeting (CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II). ********************************************************************************* This agenda is duly posted outside City Hall and on the City of Greenfield web site. 3/6/2025 3:58:30 PM Page 1 of 4
Check Report
Greenfield, CA By Check Number
Date Range: 02/21/2025 - 03/06/2025
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Bank Code: APBNK-APBNK
05628 ADRIAN ALBARRAN 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 200.00 323945 00180 ALL SAFE INTEGRATED SYSTEMS 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 1,000.00 323946 00156 AMERICAN SUPPLY COMPANY 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 165.13 323947 05516 ANDRES PAREDES 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 344.00 323948 04951 ANDY P GUTIERREZ 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 1,500.00 323949 05508 BPR CONSULTING GROUP LLC 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 30,242.77 323950 01937 BRENT SLAMA CONSULTING 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 9,945.00 323951 05294 CALIFORNIA SCADA SERVICES, LLC 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 429.67 323952 00396 CASEY PRINTING 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 985.50 323953 01942 CITY OF SOLEDAD 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 3,570.00 323954 04208 F. LODUCA CO. 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 18,911.95 323955 04455 FABIOLA LOPEZ 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 49.70 323956 05485 FLOCK SAFETY 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 47,450.00 323957 04525 GOLDEN STATE TRUCK & TRAILER REPAIR 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 583.52 323958 00725 GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 2,938.54 323959 05005 GREENFIELD 101, INC. 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 120.00 323960 00767 GREENFIELD TOWING 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 395.00 323961 00721 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 25.88 323962 00805 HACH COMPANY 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 55.09 323963 00820 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 404.72 323964 05200 HYDROSCIENCE ENGINEERS, INC. 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 14,684.50 323965 04452 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM OF SAN JOSE, INC.02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 520.24 323966 03107 L.N. CURTIS & SONS 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 2,188.91 323967 13004 MONTEREY BAY ANALYTICAL SERVICE 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 9,473.00 323968 01316 MONTEREY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 18,555.30 323969 04600 MY CHEVROLET 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 1,111.45 323970 04670 NAPA AUTO PARTS 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 173.99 323971 05562 NJA ARCHITECTURE 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 35,957.10 323972 01506 OFFICE DEPOT 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 182.08 323973 01532 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 1,655.16 323974 01683 PETE'S TOWING AND P&R TOWING 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 870.00 323975 04188 PREMIUM ALIGNMENT & BRAKE SERVICE 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 299.95 323976 04299 PURE WATER 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 104.50 323977
01705 QUINN COMPANY 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 1,518.28 323978 01919 SALINAS VALLEY FORD 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 97.80 323979 01999 SALINAS VALLEY SOLID WASTE AUTHORITY 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 69,186.91 323980 04338 SHRED-IT USA 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 157.47 323982 01988 SIRCHIE ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 55.42 323983 04315 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 791.44 323984 02037 TRI-CITIES DISPOSAL 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 7,791.88 323985 02002 TRI-COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 40.00 323986 05128 V & V MANUFACTURING, INC. 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 138.97 323987 03872 WATER AWARENESS COMMITTEE 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 1,000.00 323988 05622 WESTERN STATE DESIGN, INC 02/21/2025 Regular 0.00 892.00 323989 05313 AGILE OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE, PC 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 860.00 323990 00180 ALL SAFE INTEGRATED SYSTEMS 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 300.00 323991 00101 AT&T 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 66.99 323992
04750 BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 426.92 323993 04497 BRYAN DE LA TORRE 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 284.08 323994 05100 BSN SPORTS LLC 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 435.92 323995 00302 C & N TRACTORS 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 491.22 323996 05570 CALIFORNIA STRATEGIES & ADVOCACY, LLC 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 15,000.00 323997 00396 CASEY PRINTING 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 1,772.02 323998 05536 CHRISTIAN A SCHIERER 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 196.64 323999 1 Check Report Date Range: 02/21/2025 - 03/06/2025
3/6/2025 3:58:30 PM Page 2 of 4
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number 04407 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 58.40 324000 04681 CLARK PEST CONTROL 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 190.00 324001 05194 CLEATH-HARRIS GEOLOGISTS, INC. 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 6,998.11 324002 05627 COUNTY OF ORANGE SHERIFF-CORONER 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 560.00 324003 04944 CYNTHIA ZAVALA 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 463.60 324004 05452 DIEGO MENDOZA 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 463.60 324005 05008 EAST BAY TIRE CO. 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 436.57 324006 00528 EL CAMINO ELECTRIC 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 2,440.00 324007 04287 FLUID RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 1,978.16 324008 04753 G&C CONSULTING, INC. 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 1,800.00 324009 04132 GARDAWORLD 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 693.46 324010
04525 GOLDEN STATE TRUCK & TRAILER REPAIR 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 7.69 324011 00725 GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 397.72 324012 00721 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 146.58 324013 00805 HACH COMPANY 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 795.19 324014 01258 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 19,527.62 324015 05192 MAGNOLIA PLACE SENIOR 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 1,450.00 324016 05565 MAGNOLIA PLACE SENIOR II 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 399.83 324017 01348 MONTEREY COUNTY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPT. 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 1,373.50 324018 01506 OFFICE DEPOT 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 194.12 324019 01532 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 154.68 324020 01897 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 149.28 324021 04731 ROBERT URQUIDEZ 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 463.60 324022 01988 SIRCHIE ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 1,308.49 324023 01933 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAPING 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 15,925.00 324024 00386 STATE OF CA DEPT. OF JUSTICE 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 196.00 324025 00780 STEPHANIE GARCIA 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 196.00 324026 04445 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS, LLC 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 391.41 324027 03919 TPX COMMUNICATIONS 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 1,905.38 324028 03912 URETSKY SECURITY 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 2,921.94 324029 02208 VALLEY SAW & GARDEN EQUIPMENT 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 619.54 324030 02210 VERIZON WIRELESS 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 3,538.35 324031 03987 U.S. BANK 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 66,889.15 324032 00749 CITY OF GREENFIELD 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 211.37 324042 00713 G P O A 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 1,440.00 324043
00795 GREENFIELD POLICE SERGEANTS ASSOCIATION 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 600.00 324044 04521 Greenfield Professional Firefighters 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 315.00 324045 05322 OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NO. 3 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 193.86 324046 01911 SEIU Local 521 02/28/2025 Regular 0.00 766.57 324047 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 02/28/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 315.19 DFT0006499 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 02/28/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 503.69 DFT0006500 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 02/28/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 1,146.06 DFT0006501 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 02/28/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 2,490.00 DFT0006502 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 02/28/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 2,215.00 DFT0006503 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 02/28/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 2,029.00 DFT0006504 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 02/28/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 400.00 DFT0006505 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 02/28/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 1,375.00 DFT0006506 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 02/28/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 275.00 DFT0006507 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 02/28/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 250.00 DFT0006508 00431 DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES 02/28/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 1,251.01 DFT0006509 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 02/28/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 4,106.50 DFT0006510 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 02/28/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 76.03 DFT0006511 00384 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD 02/28/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 4,867.70 DFT0006512 03103 Internal Revenue Service 02/28/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 11,789.34 DFT0006513 03103 Internal Revenue Service 02/28/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 50,409.84 DFT0006514 00384 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD 02/28/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 16,498.95 DFT0006515 03103 Internal Revenue Service 02/28/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 39,699.92 DFT0006516 01916 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO. 03/03/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 50.00 DFT0006517 00384 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD 03/03/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 21.49 DFT0006518 03103 Internal Revenue Service 03/03/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 51.92 DFT0006519 03103 Internal Revenue Service 03/03/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 222.02 DFT0006520 2 Check Report Date Range: 02/21/2025 - 03/06/2025
3/6/2025 3:58:30 PM Page 3 of 4
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number 00384 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD 03/03/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 35.86 DFT0006521 03103 Internal Revenue Service 03/03/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 116.22 DFT0006522 00384 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD 03/04/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 181.16 DFT0006523 03103 Internal Revenue Service 03/04/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 437.80 DFT0006524 03103 Internal Revenue Service 03/04/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 1,871.92 DFT0006525 00384 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD 03/04/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 226.64 DFT0006526 03103 Internal Revenue Service 03/04/2025 Bank Draft 0.00 693.41 DFT0006527 Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Discount
Payment
Payment Type Count
Bank Code APBNK Summary
Bank Drafts
EFT's
93 0
0 29
0 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
122 0.00
Payment
445,156.38

0.00 0.00
143,606.67

0.00 588,763.05
Payable
Count
190
0 0
29 0
219
3 Check Report Date Range: 02/21/2025 - 03/06/2025
3/6/2025 3:58:30 PM Page 4 of 4
All Bank Codes Check Summary
Payment Type Discount
Payment
Count Payment
Payable
Count
Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Bank Drafts
EFT's
93 0
0 29
0 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
122 0.00
445,156.38

0.00 0.00
143,606.67

0.00 588,763.05
190
0 0
29 0
219
Fund Name Period Amount
Fund Summary
999 CASH CONTROL 2/2025 584,854.61
999 CASH CONTROL 3/2025 3,908.44
588,763.05
4 3/6/2025 4:00:21 PM Page 1 of 17
Expense Approval Report
Greenfield, CA By Fund
Payment Dates 2/21/2025 - 3/6/2025
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount Fund: 100 - GENERAL FUND
STAPLES ADVANTAGE 323984 02/21/2025 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES - PARKS 100-550-65600.000 245.90 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 323984 02/21/2025 CLIPS 100-310-61400.000 6.13 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 323984 02/21/2025 OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-310-61400.000 210.89 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 323984 02/21/2025 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES - CVC 100-111-65600.000 111.67 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 323984 02/21/2025 OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-310-61400.000 70.57 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 323984 02/21/2025 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES - CVC 100-111-65600.000 90.45 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - WRITING NOTE PA… 100-190-61400.000 16.41 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - CALENDAR 2025 100-190-61400.000 9.80 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - FINANCE DEPT CAL…100-190-61400.000 37.16 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 HYATT PLACE - 2025 CSMFO … 100-190-67100.000 341.44 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 QUICKQUACK - UNIT 53 CAR … 100-215-65100.000 32.99 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 COSTCO - GAS FOR UNIT 53 T… 100-215-67200.000 20.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 MAYORS BREAKFAST - MEETI… 100-201-67100.000 12.51 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 CA POLICE CHIEFS - CANCELED…100-201-67200.000 -825.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 TESLA SUPERCHARGER - UNITS…100-215-66100.000 5.75 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 TESLA SUPERCHARGER - UNITS…100-215-66100.000 5.70 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 TESLA SUPERCHARGER - UNITS…100-215-66100.000 27.22 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 TESLA SUPERCHARGER - UNITS…100-215-66100.000 4.10 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 TESLA SUPERCHARGER - UNITS…100-215-66100.000 19.28 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 TESLA SUPERCHARGER - UNITS…100-215-66100.000 23.82 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 TESLA SUPERCHARGER - UNITS…100-215-66100.000 13.81 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 TESLA SUPERCHARGER - UNITS…100-215-66100.000 12.85 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 TESLA SUPERCHARGER - UNITS…100-215-66100.000 5.78 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 TESLA SUPERCHARGER - UNITS…100-215-66100.000 9.86 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 TESLA SUPERCHARGER - UNITS…100-215-66100.000 6.66 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 TESLA SUPERCHARGER - UNITS…100-215-66100.000 8.34 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 TESLA SUPERCHARGE - UNIT 54 100-215-66100.000 8.76 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 TESLA SUPERCHARGER - UNITS…100-215-66100.000 9.51 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 TESLA SUPERCHARGER - UNITS…100-215-66100.000 17.45 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 CHEVRON - GAS FOR UNITS 50…100-215-66100.000 163.94 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 5.11, INC - NUNEZ UNIFORM … 100-215-71400.000 788.79 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 SAFARILAND - NUNEZ HOLSTE… 100-215-71400.000 304.13 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 CLEARWATER EXPRESS - CAR … 100-215-65100.000 23.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 CLEARWATER EXPRESS - CAR … 100-215-65100.000 23.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 PILOT - GAS FOR UNIT 47 100-215-66100.000 51.44 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 CHEVRON - GAS UNIT 45 INVE… 100-215-63400.000 100.61 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 CHEVRON - GAS UNIT 45 AND… 100-215-65100.000 14.99 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 CHEVRON - GAS UNIT 45 AND… 100-215-65100.000 14.99 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 CHEVRON - GAS UNIT 45 AND… 100-215-66100.000 83.86 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 CHEVRON - GAS UNIT 45 AND… 100-215-66100.000 82.34 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 APWA - AWARDS CEREMONY 100-310-67100.000 220.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - DESK SUPPLIES 100-601-61400.000 40.90 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - DESK SUPPLIES 100-601-61400.000 27.32 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - DESK CALENDAR/D…100-601-61400.000 22.09 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 CHISPA - CELEBRATION PC AT… 100-601-63100.000 250.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - STUDYING BOOK F… 100-601-67200.000 54.47 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 LC ACTION POLICE - WEAPON …100-22481 1,371.57 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - CHAIR BACK SUPP… 100-22491 28.08 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - DESK CHAIR FOR B… 100-22491 393.11 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 VOOMISUPPLY.COM - WIRELE… 100-111-65900.000 319.37 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 CHARLOTTE ELECTRIC - TRANE…100-111-65900.000 366.24 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 ZORO TOOLS - EVIDENCE CON… 100-201-65900.000 454.41 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 PRIME VIDEO - UNKNOWN C… 100-26001 -3.99 5 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 2/21/2025 - 3/6/2025 3/6/2025 4:00:21 PM Page 2 of 17
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 PRIME VIDEO - UNKNOWN C… 100-26001 -2.99 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 PRIME VIDEO - UNKNOWN C… 100-26001 -2.99 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 PRIME VIDEO - UNKNOWN C… 100-26001 -2.99 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 LAWNEQ.COM - AERATOR SP… 100-550-65700.000 37.23 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 CANVA - REC BANNER PRINTI… 100-551-61200.000 676.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-551-61400.000 76.64 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-551-61400.000 76.59 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-551-61400.000 145.61 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE - AR…100-551-63500.000 216.67 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - BASKETBALL NETS 100-551-63500.000 81.45 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - BASKETBALL REF … 100-551-63500.000 60.56 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - BALLET BARRS 100-551-63500.000 197.08 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 DOLLAR TREE - ARTS/CRAFT S… 100-551-63500.000 45.17 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - BASKETBALL LEAG… 100-551-63500.000 28.08 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE - SU…100-551-63500.000 2.15 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - BASKETBALL LEAG… 100-551-63500.000 166.42 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 DICK'S - BASKETBALLS 100-551-63500.000 365.30 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - PRIME MEMBERSH…100-551-63900.000 16.41 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 GOOGLE - GOOGLE DRIVE SUB…100-551-63900.000 1.99 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - JANITORIAL SUPPLI…100-551-65600.000 52.45 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - JANITORIAL SUPPLI…100-551-65600.000 54.74 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - JANITORIAL SUPPLI…100-551-65600.000 46.40 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - JANITORIAL SUPPLI…100-551-65600.000 104.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 CPRS - RECREATION CONVENT…100-551-67200.000 765.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - DRY ERASE BOARD… 100-310-61400.000 2.32 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - SHARPIE MARKERS 100-310-61400.000 9.84 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - ENGINEER VEST 100-310-65200.000 31.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 FEDEX - POSTAGE EVIDENCE S… 100-201-61100.000 41.95 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 FEDEX - POSTAGE FOR EVIDE… 100-201-61100.000 92.89 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 FEDEX - EVIDENCE SHIPPING … 100-201-61100.000 40.79 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - OFFICE SUPPLIES 100-201-61400.000 25.74 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 CROWN AWARDS INC - EMPL… 100-201-65100.000 203.36 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 SALINAS ELKS LODGE - PUBLIC…100-201-65100.000 60.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - PD JANITORIAL SU… 100-201-65600.000 43.56 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - PD JANITORIAL SU… 100-201-65600.000 35.40 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - JANITORIAL SUPPLI…100-201-65600.000 127.95 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 OTC BRANDS, INC. - SUPPLIES … 100-201-68200.000 74.14 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - DEPT PHONE CASE 100-215-64600.000 12.80 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - PD CELL PHONE SC… 100-215-64600.000 7.65 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 TARGET - PD NEW COFFEE M… 100-215-65100.000 152.94 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 TARGET - PD NEW COFFEE M… 100-215-65100.000 -152.94 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 RANCHO SAN MIGUEL - COFF… 100-215-65100.000 6.98 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 QUICKCODESINC.COM - CA C… 100-215-65400.000 135.81 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 QUICKCODESINC.COM - CA C… 100-215-67600.000 129.51 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - ANIMAL CONTROL …100-230-65400.000 153.68 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - KENNEL JANITORIA…100-230-65600.000 296.56 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 ACE PARKING - MAYOR & CO… 100-101-67100.000 90.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 SHERATON GRAND HOTEL - … 100-101-67100.000 1,093.96 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 SHERATON GRAND HOTEL - … 100-101-67100.000 1,093.96 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - CERTIFACTE HOLD… 100-101-65100.000 192.66 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 RANCHO SAN MIGUEL - CITY … 100-101-65100.000 18.88 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 FOODS CO - STAFF MEETING 100-110-65100.000 22.35 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - LETTER ENVELOPES 100-111-61200.000 136.80 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - WINDOW ENVELO… 100-111-61200.000 127.75 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - NOTEPADS 100-170-61400.000 18.59 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 FORMS FULFILLMENT CENTER …100-190-61400.000 268.17 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 MO CO RECORDER OFFICE - … 100-24718 68.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 LAKE NATOMA INN - SLI SESSI… 100-215-67200.000 401.70 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 CREATIVE CASTINGS - DEPOSIT…100-215-71400.000 1,798.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 ACME CAR WASH - UNIT #42 100-215-65100.000 14.99 6 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 2/21/2025 - 3/6/2025 3/6/2025 4:00:21 PM Page 3 of 17
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount TRI-CITIES DISPOSAL 323985 02/21/2025 STREET SWEEPING LANDFIELD…100-320-64400.000 1,473.42 SALINAS VALLEY SOLID WASTE…323980 02/21/2025 WASTE SERVICES FY 2024-2025 100-191-64400.000 69,186.91 GARDAWORLD 324010 02/28/2025 EXCESS LIABILITY/EXCESS ITE… 100-190-63300.000 693.46 OFFICE DEPOT 323973 02/21/2025 COPY PAPER - POLICE DEPT 100-201-61400.000 182.08 PURE WATER 323977 02/21/2025 WATER - CITY HALL 100-111-65100.000 104.50 VERIZON WIRELESS 324031 02/28/2025 CELL PHONES - PW 100-101-64600.000 190.05 VERIZON WIRELESS 324031 02/28/2025 CELL PHONES - PW 100-110-64600.000 42.17 VERIZON WIRELESS 324031 02/28/2025 CELL PHONES - PW 100-320-64600.000 21.09 VERIZON WIRELESS 324031 02/28/2025 CELL PHONES - PW 100-550-64600.000 21.08 VERIZON WIRELESS 324031 02/28/2025 CELL PHONES - PW 100-551-64600.000 215.85 VERIZON WIRELESS 324031 02/28/2025 CELL PHONES - PW 100-601-64600.000 42.17 BRENT SLAMA CONSULTING 323951 02/21/2025 PLANNING CONSULTING SERV…100-22567 682.50 BRENT SLAMA CONSULTING 323951 02/21/2025 PLANNING CONSULTING SERV…100-22569 195.00 BRENT SLAMA CONSULTING 323951 02/21/2025 PLANNING CONSULTING SERV…100-601-63600.000 3,315.00 BRENT SLAMA CONSULTING 323951 02/21/2025 PLANNING CONSULTING SERV…100-601-73720.000 5,752.50 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 323974 02/21/2025 MOTOR OIL FOR MAINTENAN… 100-111-66300.000 316.32 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 323962 02/21/2025 7520 - BOLT, NUTS 100-550-66300.000 3.04 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 35 02/25/2025 P.P. BASEBALL FIELD 100-550-64100.000 154.56 CASEY PRINTING 323953 02/21/2025 #10 ENVELOPES - CITY OF GRE…100-111-61200.000 985.50 AMERICAN SUPPLY COMPANY 323947 02/21/2025 FACIAL TISSUE/TOILET SEAT C… 100-201-65600.000 165.13 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 35 02/25/2025 P.P. COMMUNITY CENTER 100-551-64100.000 618.25 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 35 02/25/2025 P.P. COMMUNITY CENTER 100-551-64200.000 549.97 OFFICE DEPOT 324019 02/28/2025 COPY PAER - CITY HALL 100-111-61200.000 128.63 OFFICE DEPOT 324019 02/28/2025 COFFEE CUPS - POLICE DEPT 100-201-65100.000 65.49 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 323974 02/21/2025 7520 - FLASHER 100-550-66300.000 16.64 V & V MANUFACTURING, INC. 323987 02/21/2025 SGT. OF THE YEAR 2024 BADGE 100-215-65200.000 138.97 SIRCHIE ACQUISITION COMP… 323983 02/21/2025 EVIDENCE BOXES/SEALING TA… 100-215-65400.000 55.42 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 324020 02/28/2025 7520 - AIR FILTER 100-550-66300.000 37.50 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 324020 02/28/2025 7520 - GSK MATERIAL 100-550-66300.000 6.33 GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 324012 02/28/2025 7520 - STARTER 100-550-66300.000 28.43 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 324021 02/28/2025 2304 - FILTER ELEMENT 100-111-66300.000 149.28 ADRIAN ALBARRAN 323945 02/21/2025 BOOTS REIMBURSEMENT FY 2…100-320-65200.000 100.00 ADRIAN ALBARRAN 323945 02/21/2025 BOOTS REIMBURSEMENT FY 2…100-550-65200.000 100.00 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 35 02/25/2025 COMMUNITY PARK 100-550-64100.000 149.24 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 324015 02/28/2025 LEGAL SERVICES - GENERAL L… 100-150-63100.000 1,679.38 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 324015 02/28/2025 LEGAL SERVICES - FIRE 100-150-63100.000 348.00 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 324015 02/28/2025 LEGAL SERVICES - POLICE 100-150-63100.000 370.50 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 324015 02/28/2025 LEGA 100-150-63100.000 214.50 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 324015 02/28/2025 LEGAL SERVICES - PITCHESS … 100-150-63100.000 3,363.69 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 324015 02/28/2025 LEGAL SERVICES - FIRE UNION… 100-150-63100.000 399.50 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 324015 02/28/2025 LEGAL SERVICES - BUILDING, P…100-150-63100.000 3,820.35 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 324015 02/28/2025 LEGAL SERVICES - COUNCIL M… 100-150-63100.000 4,181.20 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 324015 02/28/2025 LEGAL SERVICES - PUBLIC WO… 100-150-63100.000 3,635.00 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 324015 02/28/2025 LEGAL SERVICES - WASTEWAT… 100-150-63100.000 560.00 GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 324012 02/28/2025 PPE EQUIPMENT - A. ALBARR… 100-320-65200.000 127.96 GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 324012 02/28/2025 PPE EQUIPMENT - A. ALBARR… 100-550-65200.000 127.96 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 324000 02/28/2025 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 100-111-65600.000 40.03 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 324000 02/28/2025 UNIFORMS 100-320-65200.000 80.94 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 324000 02/28/2025 UNIFORMS 100-550-65200.000 80.94 VERIZON WIRELESS 324031 02/28/2025 CELL PHONES - POLICE DEPT 100-215-64600.000 2,082.67 VERIZON WIRELESS 324031 02/28/2025 CELL PHONES - POLICE DEPT 100-230-64600.000 122.35 GREENFIELD 101, INC. 323960 02/21/2025 CAR WASHES - POLICE DEPT J… 100-215-65100.000 120.00 SIRCHIE ACQUISITION COMP… 324023 02/28/2025 PD EVIDENCE POLICE SUPPLIES 100-215-65400.000 1,308.49 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS, LLC 324027 02/28/2025 UNIFORM PANTS - CSO CORR… 100-230-65200.000 104.03 TEMPLETON UNIFORMS, LLC 324027 02/28/2025 PD UNIFORM - VOLUNTEER N… 100-201-65200.000 287.38 MONTEREY COUNTY SHERIFF'S…323969 02/21/2025 PD CRIMINAL JUSTICE INFO SY…100-215-63400.000 18,555.30 C & N TRACTORS 323996 02/28/2025 7555 - PARTS 100-550-66300.000 491.22 CLARK PEST CONTROL 324001 02/28/2025 PEST CONTROL SERVICES 100-111-65900.000 190.00 VALLEY SAW & GARDEN EQUI… 324030 02/28/2025 TRIMMER LINE/CHAIN LOOP 100-550-66300.000 396.42 VALLEY SAW & GARDEN EQUI… 324030 02/28/2025 7546 - CARBURETOR/FUEL LINE 100-550-66300.000 223.12 7 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 2/21/2025 - 3/6/2025 3/6/2025 4:00:21 PM Page 4 of 17
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount PETE'S TOWING AND P&R TO… 323975 02/21/2025 TOWING SERVICE - PD EVIDE… 100-215-63400.000 290.00 PETE'S TOWING AND P&R TO… 323975 02/21/2025 TOWING SERVICE - PD EVIDE… 100-215-63400.000 290.00 PETE'S TOWING AND P&R TO… 323975 02/21/2025 TOWING SERVICE - PD EVIDE… 100-215-63400.000 290.00 BPR CONSULTING GROUP LLC 323950 02/21/2025 BUILDING SERVICES/PLAN CH… 100-25105 16,082.52 BPR CONSULTING GROUP LLC 323950 02/21/2025 BUILDING SERVICES/PLAN CH… 100-601-63600.000 14,160.25 HARSHWAL & COMPANY, LLP 36 02/28/2025 AUDITING SERVICES 100-190-63300.000 1,000.00 ALL SAFE INTEGRATED SYSTE… 323946 02/21/2025 DEPOSIT - SECURITY SYSTEM I… 100-551-63700.000 1,000.00 MONTEREY COUNTY INFORM…324018 02/28/2025 PD TELECOM COUNTY NETW… 100-215-64500.000 1,373.50 BSN SPORTS LLC 323995 02/28/2025 BASKETBALL JERSEYS 100-551-63500.000 40.53 BSN SPORTS LLC 323995 02/28/2025 BASKETBALL JERSEYS 100-551-63500.000 40.53 BSN SPORTS LLC 323995 02/28/2025 BASKETBALL JERSEYS 100-551-63500.000 40.53 BSN SPORTS LLC 323995 02/28/2025 BASKETBALL JERSEYS 100-551-63500.000 40.53 BSN SPORTS LLC 323995 02/28/2025 BASKETBALL JERSEYS 100-551-63500.000 43.80 BSN SPORTS LLC 323995 02/28/2025 BASKETBALL JERSEYS 100-551-63500.000 43.80 BSN SPORTS LLC 323995 02/28/2025 BASKETBALL JERSEYS 100-551-63500.000 162.10 BSN SPORTS LLC 323995 02/28/2025 BASKETBALL JERSEYS 100-551-63500.000 24.10 ALL SAFE INTEGRATED SYSTE… 323991 02/28/2025 QUARTERLY FIRE MONITORIN… 100-111-63900.000 150.00 ALL SAFE INTEGRATED SYSTE… 323991 02/28/2025 QUARTERLY OPEN AND CLOSE…100-111-63900.000 45.00 ALL SAFE INTEGRATED SYSTE… 323991 02/28/2025 QUARTERLY BURGLAR MONIT… 100-111-63900.000 105.00 STEPHANIE GARCIA 324026 02/28/2025 PER-DIEM - PLANNING COMM…100-601-63100.000 196.00 DIEGO MENDOZA 324005 02/28/2025 PER-DIEM - PLANNING COMM…100-601-63100.000 463.60 CYNTHIA ZAVALA 324004 02/28/2025 PER-DIEM - PLANNING COMM…100-601-63100.000 463.60 ROBERT URQUIDEZ 324022 02/28/2025 PER-DIEM - PLANNING COMM…100-601-63100.000 463.60 SEIU Local 521 324047 02/28/2025 COPE - Union Dues 100-22420 0.21 SEIU Local 521 324047 02/28/2025 Union Dues 100-22420 327.34 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006499 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 100-22430 94.55 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006500 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 100-22430 109.76 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006501 02/28/2025 Deferred Compensation Loan … 100-22435 1,146.06 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006502 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-GPOA 100-22430 500.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006503 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-GPSA 100-22430 1,365.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006504 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-Management 100-22430 860.01 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006505 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-Mid Management 100-22430 219.99 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006506 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 100-22430 337.52 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006507 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-OE3 Employees 100-22430 275.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006508 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-Chief of Police 100-22430 250.00 G P O A 324043 02/28/2025 GPOA DUES 100-22410 320.00
OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL…324046 02/28/2025 Union Dues 100-22420 64.62 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006510 02/28/2025 Roth Retirement 100-22431 4,106.50 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006511 02/28/2025 Roth Retirement 100-22431 76.03 GREENFIELD POLICE SERGEAN… 324044 02/28/2025 GPSA DUES 100-22415 300.00 CITY OF GREENFIELD 324042 02/28/2025 Weapon Repay 100-22481 211.37 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006512 02/28/2025 SDI 100-22225 1,645.44 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006513 02/28/2025 Medicare 100-22215 4,002.20 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006514 02/28/2025 Social Security 100-22215 17,112.68 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006515 02/28/2025 State Withholding 100-22220 5,207.09 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006516 02/28/2025 Federal Tax Withholding 100-22210 13,495.93 Fund 100 - GENERAL FUND Total: 233,472.88
Fund: 102 - Fire General
U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 MATTRESS FIRM - ACTING CHI…102-250-65100.000 1,169.62 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - MOUSE PAD 102-250-61400.000 6.23 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - BINDER SUPPLIES 102-250-61400.000 47.98 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - LAPTOP ACCESSOR…102-250-61400.000 177.91 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - PLASTIC ZIP ENVEL… 102-250-61400.000 8.75 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 COSTCO - NEW MATTRESSES 102-250-65100.000 1,487.36 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 EL RINCONCITO - RETIREMENT…102-250-65100.000 169.14 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - CURTAIN ROD 102-250-65900.000 18.60 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 COSTCO - COFFEE/LAUNDRY … 102-250-65100.000 160.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 COSTCO - COFFEE/LAUNDRY … 102-250-65600.000 82.90 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 SHELL - STRIKE TEAM EXPENS… 102-250-67300.003 146.35 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 ENCINO UNION GASOLINE - S… 102-250-67300.003 102.81 8 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 2/21/2025 - 3/6/2025 3/6/2025 4:00:21 PM Page 5 of 17
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 WHEELER RIDGE - STRIKE TE… 102-250-67300.003 100.73 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 CHEVRON - STRIKE TEAM EXP… 102-250-67300.003 155.45 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 IN-N-OUT - STRIKE TEAM EXP… 102-250-67300.003 37.02 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 EL CHARRITO - STRIKE TEAM E…102-250-67300.003 34.51 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 DUNKIN DONUTS - STRIKE TE… 102-250-67300.003 31.36 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 HYATT REGENCY - STRIKE TE… 102-250-67300.003 214.29 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 HYATT REGENCY - STRIKE TE… 102-250-67300.003 214.29 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 LA CHA CHA CHA - STRIKE TE… 102-250-67300.003 153.30 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 CHEVRON - STRIKE TEAM EXP… 102-250-67300.003 85.83 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 TRAVELCENTERS SANTA NELLA…102-250-67300.003 72.71 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 IFIT - MEMBERSHIP 102-250-68300.000 39.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 SOLEDAD ACE HARDWARE - C… 102-250-65900.000 4.37 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 SOLEDAD ACE HARDWARE - JO…102-250-65900.000 13.10 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 HOME DEPOT - PAINT FIRE H… 102-250-65900.000 53.07 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 NIHE & MASTER - BLS INSTRU… 102-250-67400.000 125.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 HOME DEPOT - TOTES 102-250-61400.000 54.52 BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC 323993 02/28/2025 FIRE DEPT SUPPLIES 102-250-65400.000 146.76 BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC 323993 02/28/2025 FIRE DEPT SUPPLIES 102-250-65400.000 225.96 VERIZON WIRELESS 324031 02/28/2025 CELL PHONES - PW 102-250-64600.000 168.68 BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC 323993 02/28/2025 FIRE DEPT SUPPLIES 102-250-65400.000 54.20 L.N. CURTIS & SONS 323967 02/21/2025 STEEL TOE BOOTS 102-250-65200.000 218.46 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 35 02/25/2025 FIRE DEPT 102-250-64100.000 1,137.75 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 35 02/25/2025 FIRE DEPT 102-250-64200.000 394.82 TRI-COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION 323986 02/21/2025 FIRE EXTINGUISHER MAINTEN… 102-250-65900.000 40.00 L.N. CURTIS & SONS 323967 02/21/2025 FD WILDLAND UNIFORM PAN… 102-250-65200.000 1,970.45 WESTERN STATE DESIGN, INC 323989 02/21/2025 FD EXTRACTOR REPAIR 102-250-66300.000 892.00 EL CAMINO ELECTRIC 324007 02/28/2025 NEW 20 AMP CIRCUIT INSTAL… 102-250-65900.000 1,810.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006500 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 102-22430 162.73 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006506 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 102-22430 250.00 Greenfield Professional Firefig…324045 02/28/2025 Fire Union Dues 102-22410 211.51 DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERV…DFT0006509 02/28/2025 Misc Withholding 102-22450 346.15 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006512 02/28/2025 SDI 102-22225 513.30 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006513 02/28/2025 Medicare 102-22215 1,240.46 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006514 02/28/2025 Social Security 102-22215 5,304.00 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006515 02/28/2025 State Withholding 102-22220 2,312.56 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006516 02/28/2025 Federal Tax Withholding 102-22210 4,426.18 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006517 03/03/2025 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 102-22430 50.00 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006518 03/03/2025 SDI 102-22225 21.49 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006519 03/03/2025 Medicare 102-22215 51.92 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006520 03/03/2025 Social Security 102-22215 222.02 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006521 03/03/2025 State Withholding 102-22220 35.86 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006522 03/03/2025 Federal Tax Withholding 102-22210 116.22 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006523 03/04/2025 SDI 102-22225 181.16 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006524 03/04/2025 Medicare 102-22215 437.80 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006525 03/04/2025 Social Security 102-22215 1,871.92 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006526 03/04/2025 State Withholding 102-22220 226.64 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006527 03/04/2025 Federal Tax Withholding 102-22210 693.41 Fund 102 - Fire General Total: 30,700.61
Fund: 105 - Community Outreach
HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 323964 02/21/2025 CHRISTMAS AT THE PARK LIG… 105-105-78100.000 -65.12 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - OFFICE SUPPLIES 105-105-61400.000 14.14 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - OFFICE SUPPLIES 105-105-61400.000 25.01 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 VISTAPRINT - BUSINESS CARDS 105-105-61400.000 53.08 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - STORAGE COVER 105-105-61400.000 24.40 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - HOMELESS SUPPLI… 105-105-61400.000 15.32 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - INTERN SUPPLIES 105-105-63900.000 56.67 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 RANCHO SAN MIGUEL - INTE… 105-105-63900.000 31.62 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 STARBUCKS - INTERN ORIENT… 105-105-63900.000 44.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 LITTLE CAESARS - INTERN ORI… 105-105-63900.000 25.59 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - HOMELESS SUPPLI… 105-105-63900.000 164.23 9 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 2/21/2025 - 3/6/2025 3/6/2025 4:00:21 PM Page 6 of 17
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - HOMELESS SUPPLI… 105-105-63900.000 40.37 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - INTERN UNIFORMS 105-105-63900.000 76.54 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 THW WESTIN - MENTOR CON… 105-105-67100.000 1,131.67 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 MANGATES - MEETINGS/CON… 105-105-67100.000 -618.81 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 GRANT WRITING USA - CONF… 105-105-67100.000 495.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 MARRIOTT HOTELS - GRANT … 105-105-67100.000 252.72 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 MARRIOTT HOTELS - GRANT … 105-105-67100.000 -126.12 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 SAN JOSE TERMINAL - AIRPOR… 105-105-67100.000 90.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 STARBUCKS - HEALTHY BRAIN… 105-105-67200.000 22.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 RANCHO SAN MIGUEL - HELT… 105-105-67200.000 58.14 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 MCDONALDS - YC TRIP TO CAP…105-105-67300.000 36.91 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 LITTLE CAESARS - YOUTH COU… 105-105-67300.000 23.40 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 CITYOFSAC PARKING - YC TRIP… 105-105-67300.000 9.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 CITYOFSAC PARKING - YC TRIP… 105-105-67300.000 9.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 PANDA EXPRESS - YC TRIP TO … 105-105-67300.000 43.07 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 CHEVRON - YC TRIP TO CAPIT… 105-105-67300.000 15.43 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 PANDA EXPRESS- YC TRIP TO … 105-105-67300.000 92.55 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - SENIOR SOCIAL PH… 105-105-68200.000 79.55 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 RANCHO SAN MIGUEL - CITY … 105-105-78100.000 159.66 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 OLY'S HOME FASHION - YOUT… 105-105-78150.000 21.88 VERIZON WIRELESS 324031 02/28/2025 CELL PHONES - PW 105-105-64600.000 91.52 FABIOLA LOPEZ 323956 02/21/2025 TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT -BR…105-105-67100.000 49.70 ANDY P GUTIERREZ 323949 02/21/2025 HOUSING STABILITY PROGRA… 105-105-68204.000 1,500.00 MAGNOLIA PLACE SENIOR 324016 02/28/2025 HOUSING STABILITY PROGRA… 105-105-68204.000 1,450.00 MAGNOLIA PLACE SENIOR II 324017 02/28/2025 HOUSING STABILITY PROGRA… 105-105-68204.000 399.83 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006512 02/28/2025 SDI 105-22225 90.01 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006513 02/28/2025 Medicare 105-22215 217.52 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006514 02/28/2025 Social Security 105-22215 930.06 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006515 02/28/2025 State Withholding 105-22220 129.28 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006516 02/28/2025 Federal Tax Withholding 105-22210 419.09 Fund 105 - Community Outreach Total: 7,577.91
Fund: 200 - SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 ILEETA - CONFERENCE RUELAS 200-205-67200.000 440.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 ILEETA - CONFERENCE LERMA 200-205-67200.000 440.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMERICAN AIRLINES - ILEETA … 200-205-67200.000 1,382.74 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 ALLIANZ TRAVEL INSURANCE - …200-205-67200.000 103.70 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 7ELEVEN - GAS UNIT 47 ICE H… 200-205-67200.000 57.05 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 CHEVRON - GAS UNIT 47 ICE … 200-205-67200.000 50.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 CHEVRON - GAS UNIT 47 ICE … 200-205-67200.000 60.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 CHEVRON - GAS UNIT 47 ICE … 200-205-67200.000 64.69 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 RESIDENCE INN - FBI-LEEDA T… 200-205-67200.000 1,177.50 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 CHEVRON - GAS UNIT 45 ILEE… 200-205-67200.000 99.67 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 V & V MANUFACTURING - 28 … 200-205-65100.000 4,175.15 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 DUI CHECKPOINT 200-205-67200.000 59.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 FBI RETAIL - UNIFORM FOR FBI…200-205-67200.000 878.81 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT - F…200-205-67200.000 833.64 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 SHELL - GASO UNIT #42 FBI LE… 200-205-67200.000 93.00 ANDRES PAREDES 323948 02/21/2025 PER-DIEM - CA POLICE CHIEF'S…200-205-67200.000 344.00 FLOCK SAFETY 323957 02/21/2025 PD FLOCK VIDEO SAFETY EXP… 200-205-65100.000 6,500.00 FLOCK SAFETY 323957 02/21/2025 PD FLOCK VIDEO SAFETY SOL… 200-205-65100.000 6,500.00 COUNTY OF ORANGE SHERIFF… 324003 02/28/2025 PD SPECIAL WEAPONS & TACT…200-205-67200.000 560.00 BRYAN DE LA TORRE 323994 02/28/2025 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - … 200-205-67200.000 284.08 Fund 200 - SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT Total: 24,103.03 Fund: 201 - POLICE - OTHER GRANTS
U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 PELATON - TREADMILL MEMB… 201-215-65413.000 44.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 DUI CHECKPOINT 201-215-65412.000 318.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 HOME DEPOT - TOWER LIGHT… 201-215-65412.000 3,612.41 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 DUI CHECKPOINT 201-215-65414.000 259.00 Fund 201 - POLICE - OTHER GRANTS Total: 4,233.41
10 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 2/21/2025 - 3/6/2025 3/6/2025 4:00:21 PM Page 7 of 17
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount Fund: 220 - Supplemental Transactions & Use Tax Fund (V & W) VERIZON WIRELESS 324031 02/28/2025 CELL PHONES - POLICE DEPT 220-605-64600.000 119.02 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006500 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 220-22430 231.20 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006502 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-GPOA 220-22430 1,990.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006503 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-GPSA 220-22430 850.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006505 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-Mid Management 220-22430 100.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006506 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 220-22430 550.00 Greenfield Professional Firefig…324045 02/28/2025 Fire Union Dues 220-22410 103.49 G P O A 324043 02/28/2025 GPOA DUES 220-22410 1,120.00
OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL…324046 02/28/2025 Union Dues 220-22420 129.24 GREENFIELD POLICE SERGEAN… 324044 02/28/2025 GPSA DUES 220-22415 300.00 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006512 02/28/2025 SDI 220-22225 1,670.16 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006513 02/28/2025 Medicare 220-22215 4,036.22 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006514 02/28/2025 Social Security 220-22215 17,258.58 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006515 02/28/2025 State Withholding 220-22220 6,165.56 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006516 02/28/2025 Federal Tax Withholding 220-22210 14,519.60 Fund 220 - Supplemental Transactions & Use Tax Fund (V & W) Total: 49,143.07 Fund: 230 - GAS TAX FUND
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 34 02/21/2025 TRAFFIC LIGHTS WALNUT/3RD 230-320-64100.000 308.26 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 35 02/25/2025 TRAFFIC LIGHTS ECR/OAK 230-320-64100.000 92.62 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 35 02/25/2025 TRAFFIC LIGHTS ECR/TYLER 230-320-64100.000 82.44 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 35 02/25/2025 TRAFFIC LIGHTS ECR/ELM 230-320-64100.000 92.62 EL CAMINO ELECTRIC 324007 02/28/2025 STREET LIGHT REPAIR 230-320-63700.000 360.00 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 35 02/25/2025 STREET LIGHTS HIGH SCHOOL 230-320-64100.000 351.52 Fund 230 - GAS TAX FUND Total: 1,287.46
Fund: 263 - LLM #1 - LEXINGTON
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 34 02/21/2025 CAMBRIA - CARDONA CIR 263-360-64100.000 191.64 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 35 02/25/2025 VINEYARD GREEN 263-360-64100.000 260.86 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 35 02/25/2025 LLMD MARIPOSA 263-360-64100.000 245.03 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAP… 324024 02/28/2025 LEXINGTON SQUARE SUBDIVIS…263-360-63900.000 1,695.00 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAP… 324024 02/28/2025 MARIPOSA PLACE 263-360-63900.000 715.00 SEIU Local 521 324047 02/28/2025 Union Dues 263-22420 5.69 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006506 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 263-22430 2.52 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006512 02/28/2025 SDI 263-22225 10.30 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006513 02/28/2025 Medicare 263-22215 24.84 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006514 02/28/2025 Social Security 263-22215 106.28 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006515 02/28/2025 State Withholding 263-22220 21.50 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006516 02/28/2025 Federal Tax Withholding 263-22210 65.78 Fund 263 - LLM #1 - LEXINGTON Total: 3,344.44
Fund: 264 - LLM #2 - TERRA VERDE, ETC
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 35 02/25/2025 ST. CHRISTOPHER PARK 264-360-64100.000 105.16 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 35 02/25/2025 ST. CHARLES COMMERCIAL A… 264-360-64100.000 721.41 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 35 02/25/2025 HUERTA RESIDENTIAL/VAZQU… 264-360-64100.000 275.03 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 35 02/25/2025 LLMD LAS MANZANITAS 264-360-64100.000 15.21 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAP… 324024 02/28/2025 BAROLO PARK 264-360-63900.000 220.00 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAP… 324024 02/28/2025 ST. CHRISTOPHER PARK 264-360-63900.000 1,115.00 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAP… 324024 02/28/2025 ST CHARLES GAZEBO 264-360-63900.000 1,135.00 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAP… 324024 02/28/2025 TERRA VERDE SUBDIVISION 264-360-63900.000 1,710.00 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAP… 324024 02/28/2025 ST CHARLES STREETSCAPE AN… 264-360-63900.000 2,625.00 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAP… 324024 02/28/2025 TRADITIONS SUBDIVISION 264-360-63900.000 3,200.00 SMITH & ENRIGHT LANDSCAP… 324024 02/28/2025 LA VINA SUBDIVISION, PHASE …264-360-63900.000 3,510.00 SEIU Local 521 324047 02/28/2025 Union Dues 264-22420 5.69 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006506 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 264-22430 2.52 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006512 02/28/2025 SDI 264-22225 10.30 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006513 02/28/2025 Medicare 264-22215 24.84 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006514 02/28/2025 Social Security 264-22215 106.28 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006515 02/28/2025 State Withholding 264-22220 21.50 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006516 02/28/2025 Federal Tax Withholding 264-22210 65.78 Fund 264 - LLM #2 - TERRA VERDE, ETC Total: 14,868.72
11 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 2/21/2025 - 3/6/2025 3/6/2025 4:00:21 PM Page 8 of 17
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount Fund: 265 - SMD #1
SEIU Local 521 324047 02/28/2025 Union Dues 265-22420 5.65 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006506 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 265-22430 2.52 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006512 02/28/2025 SDI 265-22225 10.26 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006513 02/28/2025 Medicare 265-22215 24.76 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006514 02/28/2025 Social Security 265-22215 105.92 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006515 02/28/2025 State Withholding 265-22220 21.41 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006516 02/28/2025 Federal Tax Withholding 265-22210 65.49 Fund 265 - SMD #1 Total: 236.01
Fund: 266 - SMD #2
SEIU Local 521 324047 02/28/2025 Union Dues 266-22420 5.66 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006506 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 266-22430 2.52 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006512 02/28/2025 SDI 266-22225 10.29 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006513 02/28/2025 Medicare 266-22215 24.90 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006514 02/28/2025 Social Security 266-22215 106.20 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006515 02/28/2025 State Withholding 266-22220 21.45 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006516 02/28/2025 Federal Tax Withholding 266-22210 65.76 Fund 266 - SMD #2 Total: 236.78
Fund: 267 - Vintage Meadows LLMD #3
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 35 02/25/2025 VINTAGE MEADOWS PHASE 267-360-64100.000 448.90 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 35 02/25/2025 SYCAMORE ST 267-360-64100.000 9.82 Fund 267 - Vintage Meadows LLMD #3 Total: 458.72
Fund: 297 - GREENFIELD SCIENCE WORKSHOP
HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 323964 02/21/2025 LUMBER - REC ART PROGRAM…297-597-65500.000 50.21 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 323964 02/21/2025 DRILL BITS - GENERAL USE 297-597-65500.000 49.06 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 323964 02/21/2025 THREADED ROD - SCIENCE M… 297-597-65500.000 41.15 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 323964 02/21/2025 PAINT - BUILDING MAINTENA… 297-597-65900.000 329.42 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - MIRROR FILM SCIE… 297-597-65500.000 37.02 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 BARNES WELDING SUPPLY - D… 297-597-65500.000 42.94 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 KELVIN - MOTORS FOR SCIEN… 297-597-65500.000 49.75 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 MICHAELS - SCHOOL GLUE FO… 297-597-65500.000 54.71 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - DRY ERASE BOARD 297-597-65500.000 58.58 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - POWER STRIPS FOR…297-597-65500.000 62.08 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - BABY OIL FOR SLI… 297-597-65500.000 26.28 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - DRILL BIT SET GEN… 297-597-65500.000 43.74 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 HOME DEPOT - PEG BOARDS … 297-597-65500.000 161.91 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - AA BATTERIES 297-597-65500.000 191.55 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 LEDSUPPLY - LED LIGHTS FOR … 297-597-65500.000 77.73 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 ALIEXPRESS - BATTERY HOLDE… 297-597-65500.000 325.64 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - SCHOOL GLUE FOR…297-597-65500.000 78.66 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - FOAM BEADS FOR … 297-597-65500.000 24.28 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 KELVIN - PROPELLERS FOR SC… 297-597-65500.000 297.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - WATER PUMPS SC… 297-597-65500.000 95.20 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 ALIEXPRESS - BATTERY HOLDE… 297-597-65500.000 192.19 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - VINYL TUBING 297-597-65500.000 98.68 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 LOWE'S - LUMBER FOR ART P… 297-597-65500.000 77.37 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 CHATGPT - SOFTWARE OFFICE…297-597-65500.000 20.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 TRUE VALUE - PVC GLUE SCIE… 297-597-65500.000 10.94 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - FOAM BEADS FOR … 297-597-65500.000 16.35 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - STIRRERS FOR SCI… 297-597-65500.000 8.75 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - HDMI CABLE SCIE… 297-597-65500.000 7.64 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - RETURNED GLUE 297-597-65500.000 -26.22 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - RETURNED GLUE 297-597-65500.000 -52.44 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 O'REILLY - BRAKE LIGHT 297-597-65500.000 19.69 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - BIKE PARTS FOR BI… 297-597-69100.000 21.35 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - BIKE PARTS FOR BI… 297-597-69100.000 13.09 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - BIKE PARTS FOR BI… 297-597-69100.000 177.30 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 WALMART - BIKE PARTS FOR B…297-597-69100.000 115.50 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 WALMART - BIKE PARTS FOR B…297-597-69100.000 115.50 12 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 2/21/2025 - 3/6/2025 3/6/2025 4:00:21 PM Page 9 of 17
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 WALMART - BIKE PARTS FOR B…297-597-69100.000 115.50 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - BIKE PARTS FOR BI… 297-597-69100.000 76.57 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - BIKE SUPPLIES FOR…297-597-69100.000 108.73 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 COMPAGNOS MARKET - MON… 297-598-65100.201 465.75 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 COSTCO - MONTEREY BAY AQ… 297-598-65100.201 97.24 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - LUNCH SUPPLIES F… 297-598-65100.201 22.93 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 SMART&FINAL - MONTEREY B… 297-598-65100.201 74.75 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 GOOGLE PLAY - CLOUD STOR… 297-598-65100.401 99.99 VERIZON WIRELESS 324031 02/28/2025 CELL PHONES - PW 297-597-64600.000 126.51 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006504 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-Management 297-22430 879.00 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006512 02/28/2025 SDI 297-22225 234.19 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006513 02/28/2025 Medicare 297-22215 565.94 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006514 02/28/2025 Social Security 297-22215 2,419.94 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006515 02/28/2025 State Withholding 297-22220 554.44 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006516 02/28/2025 Federal Tax Withholding 297-22210 1,537.56 Fund 297 - GREENFIELD SCIENCE WORKSHOP Total: 10,291.64 Fund: 385 - INTERNAL SERVICE
CINTAS CORPORATION #630 324000 02/28/2025 UNIFORM CREDIT 385-311-65200.000 -323.50 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 323974 02/21/2025 EXTENSIONS - SHOP 385-311-65700.000 30.63 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 323984 02/21/2025 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES - CY 385-311-65600.000 55.83 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - OFFICE SUPPLIES 385-160-61400.000 12.74 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - CALENDAR CM CO… 385-160-61400.000 10.84 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 LAW ENFORCEMENT PSYCHO… 385-160-68100.000 475.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 COSTCO - 7931 BATTERIES 385-311-65000.000 215.03 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 SALINAS ACE HARDWARE - SU… 385-311-65700.000 3.26 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 HOME DEPOT - MIRROR FILM …385-311-65900.000 49.14 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 SALINAS ACE HARDWARE - SU… 385-311-65900.000 10.92 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - FIRE INK 385-125-61400.000 442.38 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - PW INK 385-125-61400.000 285.18 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - PD PRINTER DRUM 385-125-61400.000 35.03 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 RAZZOLINK - COMMUNITY CE… 385-125-61700.000 99.95 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 UATTEND.COM - CLOCK MAN… 385-125-61700.000 174.10 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 ADOBE - LICENSE 385-125-61700.000 161.96 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 RAZZOLINK - WASTEWATER I… 385-125-61700.000 99.95 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 ZOOM - LICENSE 385-125-61700.000 98.85 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - CHAMBERS AUDIO 385-125-65300.000 206.96 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - TOOLS 385-125-65300.000 120.54 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - CHAMBERS TOOLS 385-125-65300.000 107.28 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - CABLES 385-125-65300.000 89.75 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - HARD DRIVE 385-125-65300.000 86.45 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - TOOLS 385-125-65300.000 80.53 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - CABLES 385-125-65300.000 76.44 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - PW WEB CAM 385-125-65300.000 72.75 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - CHAMBERS PC RAM 385-125-65300.000 64.59 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - BLUETOOTH ADAP… 385-125-65300.000 57.45 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - TOOLS 385-125-65300.000 54.57 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - CHAMBERS PC RAM 385-125-65300.000 24.81 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - TOOLS 385-125-65300.000 13.87 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 DELL - CHAMBERS PC 385-125-65300.000 1,280.06 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - DIGITAL ELECTRON…385-311-65900.000 251.85 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 THOMSON REUTERS - CLEAR I… 385-125-61700.000 218.30 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 PG&E - CITY CAMERAS 385-125-61700.000 1,109.76 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 SAFEWAY - DECEMBER EMPL… 385-160-65100.000 38.65 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 STARBUCKS - EMPLOYEE BIRT… 385-160-65100.000 45.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 STARBUCKS - EMPLOYEE BIRT… 385-160-65100.000 500.00 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 STATE TIRE CO - UNIT 7356 TI… 385-311-66200.000 30.00 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM…323966 02/21/2025 8411 - NEW BATTERY 385-311-65000.000 520.24 GOLDEN STATE TRUCK & TRAI… 323958 02/21/2025 8411 - DIAGNOSTIC AND BATT…385-311-66200.000 583.52 SALINAS VALLEY FORD 323979 02/21/2025 OIL FILTERS - PD FLEET 385-311-65000.000 97.80 MY CHEVROLET 323970 02/21/2025 7343 - LINK 385-311-65000.000 47.44 13 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 2/21/2025 - 3/6/2025 3/6/2025 4:00:21 PM Page 10 of 17
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount VERIZON WIRELESS 324031 02/28/2025 CELL PHONES - PW 385-125-64600.000 42.17 VERIZON WIRELESS 324031 02/28/2025 CELL PHONES - PW 385-160-64600.000 42.17 VERIZON WIRELESS 324031 02/28/2025 CELL PHONES - PW 385-311-64600.000 42.17 SHRED-IT USA 323982 02/21/2025 SHREDDING SERVICES - CITY … 385-160-63900.000 157.47 GREENFIELD TOWING 323961 02/21/2025 7353 - TOWING SERVICE 385-311-66200.000 395.00 PREMIUM ALIGNMENT & BRA… 323976 02/21/2025 WEIGHTS BALANCER 385-311-65700.000 179.95 STATE OF CA DEPT. OF JUSTICE 324025 02/28/2025 FINGERPRINT SERVICES - CITY… 385-160-68100.000 196.00 PREMIUM ALIGNMENT & BRA… 323976 02/21/2025 7201 - ALIGNMENT 385-311-66200.000 120.00 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 323974 02/21/2025 SPREADER 385-311-65900.000 2.47 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 323974 02/21/2025 FLOOR DRY - SHOP 385-311-65700.000 83.18 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 323974 02/21/2025 7928 - FILTER/OIL 385-311-65000.000 164.98 NAPA AUTO PARTS 323971 02/21/2025 7928 - BRAKE ROTOR 385-311-65000.000 173.99 MY CHEVROLET 323970 02/21/2025 7343 -TWO WHEEL RIMS AND… 385-311-65000.000 1,064.01 EAST BAY TIRE CO. 324006 02/28/2025 7343 - 2 NEW TIRES 385-311-65000.000 436.57 EL CAMINO ELECTRIC 324007 02/28/2025 CAR LIFT - TROUBLESHOOT 385-311-65900.000 270.00 AGILE OCCUPATIONAL MEDIC… 323990 02/28/2025 EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL - PW… 385-160-68100.000 315.00 FLOCK SAFETY 323957 02/21/2025 PD FLOCK VIDEO SAFETY EXP… 385-125-61700.000 16,550.00 FLOCK SAFETY 323957 02/21/2025 PD FLOCK VIDEO SAFETY SOL… 385-125-61700.000 17,900.00 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 324020 02/28/2025 7353 - OIL, FILTER, MOTOR OIL 385-311-65000.000 45.16 GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 324012 02/28/2025 UTILITY CONTAINER - FLEET 385-311-65700.000 48.66 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 324000 02/28/2025 UNIFORMS 385-311-65200.000 11.50 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 324000 02/28/2025 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 385-311-65600.000 30.27 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 324020 02/28/2025 TOWING 385-311-65700.000 65.69 TPX COMMUNICATIONS 324028 02/28/2025 TELEPHONE SERVICES 385-125-64500.000 1,905.38 URETSKY SECURITY 324029 02/28/2025 FULL POST BACKGROUND CH… 385-160-68100.000 2,921.94 AGILE OCCUPATIONAL MEDIC… 323990 02/28/2025 EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 385-160-68100.000 545.00 GOLDEN STATE TRUCK & TRAI… 324011 02/28/2025 7935 - DEGREASER 385-311-65000.000 7.69 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 35 02/25/2025 CITY CAMERAS 385-125-61700.000 1,175.16 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006504 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-Management 385-22430 150.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006505 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-Mid Management 385-22430 80.01 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006506 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 385-22430 150.00 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006512 02/28/2025 SDI 385-22225 151.86 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006513 02/28/2025 Medicare 385-22215 367.00 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006514 02/28/2025 Social Security 385-22215 1,569.42 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006515 02/28/2025 State Withholding 385-22220 678.30 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006516 02/28/2025 Federal Tax Withholding 385-22210 1,620.59 Fund 385 - INTERNAL SERVICE Total: 57,374.66
Fund: 390 - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
NJA ARCHITECTURE 323972 02/21/2025 NEW COMMUNITY CENTER-A… 390-390-89141.000 35,957.10 F. LODUCA CO. 323955 02/21/2025 ENTRY SIGN REPLACEMENT P… 390-390-89115.000 9,908.13 F. LODUCA CO. 323955 02/21/2025 TOM ROGER MUSEUM GRADI… 390-390-89740.000 9,003.82 Fund 390 - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Total: 54,869.05
Fund: 503 - SEWER FUND
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 35 02/25/2025 WASTEWATER TREATMENT P… 503-335-64100.000 177,393.77 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 323962 02/21/2025 CABLE CLAMP - FREEBOARDS 503-335-65700.000 22.84 GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 323959 02/21/2025 7720 - HOSE FOR HYDRO FLU… 503-335-66300.000 2,759.73 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - FINANCE DEPT CAL…503-191-61400.000 20.24 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - FINANCE DEPT CAL…503-191-61400.000 18.58 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 HOME DEPOT - EDGE RULER … 503-335-65900.000 152.64 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 HOME DEPOT - ITEM RETURN… 503-335-65900.000 -17.64 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 HOME DEPOT - ITEM RETURN… 503-335-65900.000 -70.56 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 HOME DEPOT - CABLE RAILING…503-335-65900.000 443.18 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 HOME DEPOT - ZINK-PLATED … 503-335-65900.000 144.17 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 HOME DEPOT - EYE TO EYE T… 503-335-65900.000 94.21 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 HOME DEPOT - ZING PLATED … 503-335-65900.000 35.80 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 INSTRUMART - ELECTROMAG… 503-390-85800.000 8,882.73 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 HOME DEPOT - STEEL WIRE F… 503-390-85800.000 2,387.10 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - LOG BOOKS 503-333-65100.000 272.35 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - STAINLESS STEEL C… 503-335-65700.000 156.03 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - EYE BOLT FOR WW…503-335-65700.000 114.98 14 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 2/21/2025 - 3/6/2025 3/6/2025 4:00:21 PM Page 11 of 17
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - WIRE ROPE CLAMP…503-335-65700.000 -118.20 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - STAINLESS STEEL C… 503-335-65700.000 32.88 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - CHAIN LINK QUICK …503-335-65700.000 43.20 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - WIRE ROPE CLAMP…503-335-65700.000 586.29 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - SWITCH SENSOR F… 503-335-65700.000 69.62 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - STAIN;ESS STEEL C… 503-335-65700.000 -156.03 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - WARNING SIGNS F… 503-390-85800.000 981.75 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 HOME DEPOT - WWTP TEMP … 503-390-85800.000 6,228.86 TRI-CITIES DISPOSAL 323985 02/21/2025 WWTP- SLUDGE DISPOSAL 503-335-63800.000 6,318.46 QUINN COMPANY 323978 02/21/2025 7716 - TROUBLESHOOT/REPAIR 503-333-66300.000 1,518.28 VERIZON WIRELESS 324031 02/28/2025 CELL PHONES - PW 503-330-64600.000 84.34 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 323974 02/21/2025 3737 - OIL FILTER 503-335-66300.000 33.81 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 323974 02/21/2025 3737 - AIR FILTER 503-335-66300.000 90.51 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 323974 02/21/2025 7716 - OIL FITLER 503-333-66300.000 11.29 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 323974 02/21/2025 7717 - FILTERS 503-333-66300.000 21.68 HYDROSCIENCE ENGINEERS, I… 323965 02/21/2025 NEW WWTP DESIGN AND IM… 503-390-89133.000 14,684.50 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 323974 02/21/2025 MOTOR OIL FOR MAINTENAN… 503-333-66300.000 182.27 GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 323959 02/21/2025 HARD HAT - E SAAVEDRA 503-335-65200.000 20.43 CASEY PRINTING 323998 02/28/2025 UTILITY BILLS FY 2024-2025 503-191-61200.000 443.02 CASEY PRINTING 323998 02/28/2025 UTILITY BILLS FY 2024-2025 503-191-63800.000 443.00 HACH COMPANY 323963 02/21/2025 PH BUFFER SOLUTION 503-335-65700.000 55.09 HACH COMPANY 324014 02/28/2025 SENSOR CAP AND DPD FREE C… 503-335-65700.000 321.50 CLEATH-HARRIS GEOLOGISTS, …324002 02/28/2025 QUARTELY GROUNDWATER … 503-335-63800.000 6,998.11 CITY OF SOLEDAD 323954 02/21/2025 SLUDGE REMOVAL DUMPING …503-335-63800.000 3,570.00 G&C CONSULTING, INC. 324009 02/28/2025 CONSULTING SERVICES 503-330-63700.000 1,350.00 G&C CONSULTING, INC. 324009 02/28/2025 CONSULTING SERVICES 503-335-63700.000 450.00 CALIFORNIA SCADA SERVICES,… 323952 02/21/2025 FLOAT REMOVAL/INSTALLATI… 503-333-63700.000 429.67 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 324013 02/28/2025 CABLE TIE - SPRAYFIELD FENCE 503-390-85800.000 24.34 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 324000 02/28/2025 UNIFORMS 503-335-65200.000 69.11 MONTEREY BAY ANALYTICAL … 323968 02/21/2025 WATER AND WASTEWATER S… 503-335-63800.000 1,280.14 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 324013 02/28/2025 MARKING PAINT - SPRAYFIELDS 503-390-85800.000 43.58 FLUID RESOURCE MANAGEM… 324008 02/28/2025 TEST PIPE PLUG 503-335-63900.000 529.44 FLUID RESOURCE MANAGEM… 324008 02/28/2025 TEST PIPE PLUG AND WW ADD…503-335-63700.000 195.00 FLUID RESOURCE MANAGEM… 324008 02/28/2025 TEST PIPE PLUG AND WW ADD…503-335-63900.000 1,058.88 FLUID RESOURCE MANAGEM… 324008 02/28/2025 TEST PIPE PLUG AND WW ADD…503-335-65700.000 194.84 CALIFORNIA STRATEGIES & A… 323997 02/28/2025 LOBBYING & RELATED CONSU… 503-330-63900.000 15,000.00 SEIU Local 521 324047 02/28/2025 COPE - Union Dues 503-22420 10.51 SEIU Local 521 324047 02/28/2025 Union Dues 503-22420 209.66 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006499 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 503-22430 110.31 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006504 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-Management 503-22430 70.00 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006506 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 503-22430 39.90 DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERV…DFT0006509 02/28/2025 Misc Withholding 503-22450 904.86 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006512 02/28/2025 SDI 503-22225 281.52 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006513 02/28/2025 Medicare 503-22215 680.34 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006514 02/28/2025 Social Security 503-22215 2,909.12 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006515 02/28/2025 State Withholding 503-22220 751.05 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006516 02/28/2025 Federal Tax Withholding 503-22210 2,031.49 Fund 503 - SEWER FUND Total: 263,898.57
Fund: 504 - WATER FUND
U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - FINANCE DEPT CAL…504-191-61400.000 20.23 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 AMAZON - FINANCE DEPT CAL…504-191-61400.000 18.58 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 SONSRAY MACHINERY -3737 … 504-345-66300.000 418.57 U.S. BANK 324032 02/28/2025 DITCH WITCH WEST - 3735 VA…504-345-66300.000 -662.72 VERIZON WIRELESS 324031 02/28/2025 CELL PHONES - PW 504-340-64600.000 84.34 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 323974 02/21/2025 9800 - FITLERS 504-345-66300.000 92.23 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 323974 02/21/2025 9802 - FILTERS 504-345-66300.000 75.50 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 323974 02/21/2025 9803 - FILTER RETURNED 504-345-66300.000 -8.00 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 323974 02/21/2025 MOTOR OIL FOR MAINTENAN… 504-345-66300.000 541.65 GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 323959 02/21/2025 ADAPTORS - BACKFLOW REPL… 504-390-86211.000 51.16 AT&T 323992 02/28/2025 WATER LINES 504-345-64500.000 66.99 15 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 2/21/2025 - 3/6/2025 3/6/2025 4:00:21 PM Page 12 of 17
Vendor Name Payment Number Payment Date Description (Item) Account Number Amount GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 323959 02/21/2025 BALL VALVE - AG METER #7 504-345-65700.000 107.22 CASEY PRINTING 323998 02/28/2025 UTILITY BILLS FY 2024-2025 504-191-61200.000 443.00 CASEY PRINTING 323998 02/28/2025 UTILITY BILLS FY 2024-2025 504-191-63800.000 443.00 WATER AWARENESS COMMIT…323988 02/21/2025 WAC MEMBERSHIP 504-340-68300.000 1,000.00 HACH COMPANY 324014 02/28/2025 SENSOR CAP AND DPD FREE C… 504-345-65700.000 473.69 GREEN RUBBER-KENNEDY AG 324012 02/28/2025 SUPPLIES - WATER LEAK REPA… 504-345-65700.000 64.71 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 324015 02/28/2025 LEGAL SERVICES - ARROYO SE… 504-12105 477.75 LOZANO SMITH, LLP 324015 02/28/2025 LEGAL SERVICES - ARROYO SE… 504-390-86206.000 477.75 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 324013 02/28/2025 DUSTER - WELLS MAINTENAN… 504-345-65700.000 52.45 CINTAS CORPORATION #630 324000 02/28/2025 UNIFORMS 504-345-65200.000 69.11 GREENFIELD TRUE VALUE 324013 02/28/2025 BRASS BL TEE/DEGREASER 504-345-65700.000 26.21 MONTEREY BAY ANALYTICAL … 323968 02/21/2025 WATER AND WASTEWATER S… 504-345-63800.000 8,192.86 CHRISTIAN A SCHIERER 323999 02/28/2025 BOOTS REIMBURSEMENT - FY …504-345-65200.000 196.64 SEIU Local 521 324047 02/28/2025 COPE - Union Dues 504-22420 15.28 SEIU Local 521 324047 02/28/2025 Union Dues 504-22420 180.88 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006499 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 504-22430 110.33 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006504 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-Management 504-22430 69.99 STATE STREET BANK & TRUST … DFT0006506 02/28/2025 Defer Comp-Misc Employees 504-22430 37.50 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006512 02/28/2025 SDI 504-22225 240.07 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006513 02/28/2025 Medicare 504-22215 580.32 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006514 02/28/2025 Social Security 504-22215 2,481.36 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDD DFT0006515 02/28/2025 State Withholding 504-22220 614.81 Internal Revenue Service DFT0006516 02/28/2025 Federal Tax Withholding 504-22210 1,386.67 Fund 504 - WATER FUND Total: 18,440.13
Grand Total: 774,537.09
16 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 2/21/2025 - 3/6/2025 3/6/2025 4:00:21 PM Page 13 of 17
Report Summary
Fund Summary
Fund Payment Amount
100 - GENERAL FUND 233,472.88
102 - Fire General 30,700.61
105 - Community Outreach 7,577.91
200 - SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 24,103.03
201 - POLICE - OTHER GRANTS 4,233.41
220 - Supplemental Transactions & Use Tax Fund (V & W) 49,143.07 230 - GAS TAX FUND 1,287.46
263 - LLM #1 - LEXINGTON 3,344.44
264 - LLM #2 - TERRA VERDE, ETC 14,868.72
265 - SMD #1 236.01
266 - SMD #2 236.78
267 - Vintage Meadows LLMD #3 458.72
297 - GREENFIELD SCIENCE WORKSHOP 10,291.64
385 - INTERNAL SERVICE 57,374.66
390 - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND 54,869.05
503 - SEWER FUND 263,898.57
504 - WATER FUND 18,440.13
Grand Total: 774,537.09
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Payment Amount
100-101-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 190.05
100-101-65100.000 General Operating Suppl… 211.54
100-101-67100.000 Meetings & Conferences 2,277.92
100-110-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 42.17
100-110-65100.000 General Operating Suppl… 22.35
100-111-61200.000 Printing and Copying 1,378.68
100-111-63900.000 General Services 300.00
100-111-65100.000 General Operating Suppl… 104.50
100-111-65600.000 Janitorial Supplies 242.15
100-111-65900.000 Building Maintenance S… 875.61
100-111-66300.000 General Operations Equi… 465.60
100-150-63100.000 Administration Services 18,572.12
100-170-61400.000 Office Supplies 18.59
100-190-61400.000 Office Supplies 331.54
100-190-63300.000 Financial Services 1,693.46
100-190-67100.000 Meetings & Conferences 341.44
100-191-64400.000 Waste Disposal 69,186.91
100-201-61100.000 Postage 175.63
100-201-61400.000 Office Supplies 207.82
100-201-65100.000 General Operating Suppl… 328.85
100-201-65200.000 Uniforms/Personnel Equ… 287.38
100-201-65600.000 Janitorial Supplies 372.04
100-201-65900.000 Building Maintenance S… 454.41
100-201-67100.000 Meetings & Conferences 12.51
100-201-67200.000 Other Training -825.00
100-201-68200.000 Community Outreach 74.14
100-215-63400.000 Police Services 19,525.91
100-215-64500.000 Phone Charges 1,373.50
100-215-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 2,103.12
100-215-65100.000 General Operating Suppl… 250.94
100-215-65200.000 Uniforms/Personnel Equ… 138.97
100-215-65400.000 Police Supplies 1,499.72
100-215-66100.000 Gasoline & Oil 560.47
100-215-67200.000 Other Training 421.70
100-215-67600.000 Publications 129.51
100-215-71400.000 Police Equipment 2,890.92
17 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 2/21/2025 - 3/6/2025 3/6/2025 4:00:21 PM Page 14 of 17
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Payment Amount
100-22210 Federal Withholding Tax… 13,495.93
100-22215 FICA Payable 21,114.88
100-22220 State Withholding Tax P… 5,207.09
100-22225 S.D.I. Payable 1,645.44
100-22410 G.P.O.A. Union Dues Pay… 320.00
100-22415 G.P.S.A. Union Dues Pay… 300.00
100-22420 S.E.I.U. Union Dues Paya… 392.17
100-22430 Deferred Comp Payable 4,011.83
100-22431 Roth 4,182.53
100-22435 PERS Loan Payable 1,146.06
100-22481 POLICE AMMUNITION 1,582.94
100-22491 MBASIA 421.19
100-22567 Planning Deposits - Roba… 682.50
100-22569 Planning Deposits - Appl… 195.00
100-230-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 122.35
100-230-65200.000 Uniforms / Personnel Eq… 104.03
100-230-65400.000 Police Supplies 153.68
100-230-65600.000 Janitorial Supplies 296.56
100-24718 Civil Review Deposit - Wa… 68.00
100-25105 Building Deposits – Cons… 16,082.52
100-26001 Suspense Account -12.96
100-310-61400.000 Office Supplies 299.75
100-310-65200.000 Uniforms/Personnel Equ… 31.00
100-310-67100.000 Meetings & Conferences 220.00
100-320-64400.000 Waste Disposal 1,473.42
100-320-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 21.09
100-320-65200.000 Uniforms / Personnel Eq… 308.90
100-550-64100.000 Electricity 303.80
100-550-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 21.08
100-550-65200.000 Uniforms/Personnel Equ… 308.90
100-550-65600.000 Janitorial Supplies 245.90
100-550-65700.000 Public Works Supplies 37.23
100-550-66300.000 General Operations Equi… 1,202.70
100-551-61200.000 Printing and Copying 676.00
100-551-61400.000 Office Supplies 298.84
100-551-63500.000 Recreation Services 1,598.80
100-551-63700.000 Public Works Services 1,000.00
100-551-63900.000 General Services 18.40
100-551-64100.000 Electricity 618.25
100-551-64200.000 Gas Utility 549.97
100-551-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 215.85
100-551-65600.000 Jantorial Supplies 257.59
100-551-67200.000 Other Training … 765.00
100-601-61400.000 Office Supplies 90.31
100-601-63100.000 Adminstration Servicess 1,836.80
100-601-63600.000 Community Developmen… 17,475.25
100-601-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 42.17
100-601-67200.000 Other Training 54.47
100-601-73720.000 LEAP Grant Expenditure 5,752.50
102-22210 Federal Withholding Tax… 5,235.81
102-22215 FICA Payable 9,128.12
102-22220 State Withholding Tax P… 2,575.06
102-22225 S.D.I Payable 715.95
102-22410 Union Dues Payable 211.51
102-22430 Deferred Comp Payable 462.73
102-22450 Wage Garnishments Pay… 346.15
102-250-61400.000 Office Supplies 295.39
102-250-64100.000 Electricity 1,137.75
18 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 2/21/2025 - 3/6/2025 3/6/2025 4:00:21 PM Page 15 of 17
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Payment Amount
102-250-64200.000 Gas Utility 394.82
102-250-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 168.68
102-250-65100.000 General Operating Suppl… 2,986.12
102-250-65200.000 Uniforms/Personnel Equ… 2,188.91
102-250-65400.000 Firefighter Supplies/Prev… 426.92
102-250-65600.000 Jantorial Supplies 82.90
102-250-65900.000 Building Maintenance S… 1,939.14
102-250-66300.000 General Operations Equi… 892.00
102-250-67300.003 Other Meals & Travel 1,348.65
102-250-67400.000 Certifications 125.00
102-250-68300.000 Memberships 39.00
105-105-61400.000 Office Supplies 131.95
105-105-63900.000 General Services 439.02
105-105-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 91.52
105-105-67100.000 Meetings & Conferences 1,274.16
105-105-67200.000 Other Training 80.14
105-105-67300.000 Other Meals & Travel 229.36
105-105-68200.000 Community Outreach 79.55
105-105-68204.000 Deposit Assistance 3,349.83
105-105-78100.000 Community Events 94.54
105-105-78150.000 Youth Program 21.88
105-22210 Federal Withholding Tax… 419.09
105-22215 FICA Payable 1,147.58
105-22220 State Withholding Tax P… 129.28
105-22225 S.D.I. Payable 90.01
200-205-65100.000 General Operating Suppl… 17,175.15
200-205-67200.000 Other Training 6,927.88
201-215-65412.000 STEP Grant Expenses 3,930.41
201-215-65413.000 LEO Wellness and Menta… 44.00
201-215-65414.000 CHP Cannabis Tax Fund … 259.00
220-22210 Federal Withholding Tax… 14,519.60
220-22215 FICA Payable 21,294.80
220-22220 State Withholding Tax P… 6,165.56
220-22225 S.D.I. Payable 1,670.16
220-22410 G.P.O.A. Union Dues Pay… 1,223.49
220-22415 G.P.S.A. Union Dues Pay… 300.00
220-22420 S.E.I.U. Union Dues Paya… 129.24
220-22430 Deferred Comp Payable 3,721.20
220-605-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 119.02
230-320-63700.000 Public Works Services 360.00
230-320-64100.000 Electricity 927.46
263-22210 Federal Withholding Tax… 65.78
263-22215 FICA Payable 131.12
263-22220 State Withholding Tax P… 21.50
263-22225 S.D.I. Payable 10.30
263-22420 S.E.I.U. Union Dues Paya… 5.69
263-22430 Deferred Comp Payable 2.52
263-360-63900.000 General Services 2,410.00
263-360-64100.000 Electricity 697.53
264-22210 Federal Withholding Tax… 65.78
264-22215 FICA Payable 131.12
264-22220 State Withholding Tax P… 21.50
264-22225 S.D.I. Payable 10.30
264-22420 S.E.I.U. Union Dues Paya… 5.69
264-22430 Deferred Comp Payable 2.52
264-360-63900.000 General Services 13,515.00
264-360-64100.000 Electricity 1,116.81
265-22210 Federal Withholding Tax… 65.49
19 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 2/21/2025 - 3/6/2025 3/6/2025 4:00:21 PM Page 16 of 17
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Payment Amount
265-22215 FICA Payable 130.68
265-22220 State Withholding Tax P… 21.41
265-22225 S.D.I. Payable 10.26
265-22420 S.E.I.U. Union Dues Paya… 5.65
265-22430 Deferred Comp Payable 2.52
266-22210 Federal Withholding Tax… 65.76
266-22215 FICA Payable 131.10
266-22220 State Withholding Tax P… 21.45
266-22225 S.D.I. Payable 10.29
266-22420 S.E.I.U. Union Dues Paya… 5.66
266-22430 Deferred Comp Payable 2.52
267-360-64100.000 Electricity 458.72
297-22210 Federal Withholding Tax… 1,537.56
297-22215 FICA Payable 2,985.88
297-22220 State Withholding Tax P… 554.44
297-22225 S.D.I. Payable 234.19
297-22430 Deferred Comp Payable 879.00
297-597-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 126.51
297-597-65500.000 Recreation Supplies 2,140.44
297-597-65900.000 Building Maintenance S… 329.42
297-597-69100.000 TAMC Expenditure 743.54
297-598-65100.201 General Operating Suppl… 660.67
297-598-65100.401 General Operating Suppl… 99.99
385-125-61400.000 Office Supplies 762.59
385-125-61700.000 Software Maintenance C… 37,588.03
385-125-64500.000 Phone Charges 1,905.38
385-125-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 42.17
385-125-65300.000 Technology Supplies 2,336.05
385-160-61400.000 Office Supplies 23.58
385-160-63900.000 General Services 157.47
385-160-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 42.17
385-160-65100.000 General Operating Suppl… 583.65
385-160-68100.000 Recruitment 4,452.94
385-22210 Federal Withholding Tax… 1,620.59
385-22215 FICA Payable 1,936.42
385-22220 State Withholding Tax P… 678.30
385-22225 S.D.I. Payable 151.86
385-22430 Deferred Comp Payable 380.01
385-311-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 42.17
385-311-65000.000 Vehicle & Equip. Parts & … 2,772.91
385-311-65200.000 Uniforms / Personnel Eq… -312.00
385-311-65600.000 Janitorial Supplies 86.10
385-311-65700.000 Public Works Supplies 411.37
385-311-65900.000 Building Maintenance S… 584.38
385-311-66200.000 Vehicle and Equipment … 1,128.52
390-390-89115.000 North and South Entran… 9,908.13
390-390-89141.000 New Community Center 35,957.10
390-390-89740.000 Tom Rogers Visitors Cen… 9,003.82
503-191-61200.000 Printing and Copying 443.02
503-191-61400.000 Office Supplies 38.82
503-191-63800.000 Utility Bill Services 443.00
503-22210 Federal Withholding Tax… 2,031.49
503-22215 FICA Payable 3,589.46
503-22220 State Withholding Tax P… 751.05
503-22225 S.D.I. Payable 281.52
503-22420 S.E.I.U. Union Dues Paya… 220.17
503-22430 Deferred Comp Payable 220.21
503-22450 Wage Garnishments Pay… 904.86
20 Expense Approval Report Payment Dates: 2/21/2025 - 3/6/2025 3/6/2025 4:00:21 PM Page 17 of 17
Account Summary
Account Number Account Name Payment Amount
503-330-63700.000 Public Works Services 1,350.00
503-330-63900.000 General Services 15,000.00
503-330-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 84.34
503-333-63700.000 Public Works Services 429.67
503-333-65100.000 General Operating Suppl… 272.35
503-333-66300.000 General Equipment Ope… 1,733.52
503-335-63700.000 Public Works Services 645.00
503-335-63800.000 Sewer & Water Services 18,166.71
503-335-63900.000 General Services 1,588.32
503-335-64100.000 Electricity 177,393.77
503-335-65200.000 Uniforms / Personnel Eq… 89.54
503-335-65700.000 Public Works Supplies 1,323.04
503-335-65900.000 Building Maintenance S… 781.80
503-335-66300.000 General Equipment Ope… 2,884.05
503-390-85800.000 Emergency Repairs Was… 18,548.36
503-390-89133.000 New WWTP Design 2022 14,684.50
504-12105 Accounts Receivable 477.75
504-191-61200.000 Printing and Copying 443.00
504-191-61400.000 Office Supplies 38.81
504-191-63800.000 Utility Bill Services 443.00
504-22210 Federal Withholding Tax… 1,386.67
504-22215 FICA Payable 3,061.68
504-22220 State Withholding Tax P… 614.81
504-22225 S.D.I. Payable 240.07
504-22420 S.E.I.U. Union Dues Paya… 196.16
504-22430 Deferred Comp Payable 217.82
504-340-64600.000 Cell Phone Charges 84.34
504-340-68300.000 Memberships 1,000.00
504-345-63800.000 Water Production Servic… 8,192.86
504-345-64500.000 Phone Charges 66.99
504-345-65200.000 Uniforms / Personnel Eq… 265.75
504-345-65700.000 Public Works Supplies 724.28
504-345-66300.000 General Operations Equi… 457.23
504-390-86206.000 GSA - GSP Implementati… 477.75
504-390-86211.000 Backflow Device Replac… 51.16
Grand Total: 774,537.09
Project Account Summary
Project Account Key Payment Amount
**None** 774,537.09
Grand Total: 774,537.09
21 City Council Minutes
February 25, 2025
Page | 1

CITY COUNCIL

MINUTES
MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 2025

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor White called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Mayor White, Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez, Councilmembers Ortiz, Jones and Garcia ABSENT: None
STAFF: City Manager Wood, Public Works Director Tugel, Captain Paredes, Science Workshop Director Sanchez, Recreation Manager Perez, City Attorney Thompson, IT Director Espinosa, City Clerk Rathbun
GUESTS: Gail Stuart-White

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
All recited the Pledge of Allegiance.

AGENDA REVIEW
None.

PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA Laura asked that the cannabis budget be placed on the website so that everyone would know where the money was being spent.

COMMENTS FROM CITY COUNCIL
Councilmember Jones stated that she attended the Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority meeting and reported on the new recycling program. She also announced that The Market at the Gazebo would be starting this weekend.

Councilmember Garcia stated she attended the presentation regarding the new community center and the question-and-answer session as well as the Immigration Forum. She stated that both were well attended. She stated that the Forum had a lot of resources for the people and everyone there was very welcoming and made everyone feel safe. She also stated that she attended the Salinas Valley Solid Waste Authority so that she could be informed as an alternate.

Councilmember Ortiz stated she attended the Soledad Chamber of Commerce mixer and stated that it was a nice event. She stated that she also attended the American Legion meeting and they talked about the banners. She stated that she was planning on having a Block Party in the Spring and would notify Council of the date when it was set. She stated that she would not be able to attend the TAMC meeting on March 26th and asked Mayor White to attend and stated that she would not be at the March 25th Council meeting because she would be out of town. She announced that the Safe Routes to School Committee for Greenfield had received an Excellence Award from TAMC. 22 City Council Minutes
February 25, 2025
Page | 2
Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez stated that she attended the laptop giveaway that was sponsored by the AT&T Pro-Am and the Greenfield Science Workshop. She stated that Supervisor Lopez was in attendance as well and stated that the person from the AT&T Pro-Am stated that this was the most well-organized event they had ever attended and congratulated everyone that received laptops. She stated that there was a victim of a hit & run on 13th and Walnut and described the situation. She thanked the first responders for all their help. She stated that the incident happened outside of the city limits; however, since she and her family gave the person a ride home and the house was in town, the police department responded. She stated that she was interested in getting some sort of reward from the City for anyone with information regarding the incident. She also asked that the information regarding disabled parking be given to the resident that was requesting information. City Manager asked if Council wanted to place an item on the agenda regarding a reward. Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez stated that she would like to have an item on the next agenda.

Mayor White stated that Councilmember Garcia, Councilmember Jones and he attended the Immigration Forum. He stated that there was over 250 in attendance and thanked all the sponsors that put on the event. He stated that Supervisor Lopez had organized a meeting with the CPCU Commission, Matthew Baker, to encourage their support for the grant for broadband for South Monterey County. He stated the meeting was on February 12th and stated that all south county mayors were in attendance. He stated that broadband was very essential and thanked everyone that attended. He stated that he attended the Senior Social on February 12th and there was over 100 people in attendance. He also announced The Market at the Gazebo would start this weekend.

CONSENT ITEMS
A MOTION by Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez, seconded by Councilmember Garcia to approve the consent items including Warrants #323810 through #323917 and Bank Drafts #6479 through #6497 in the amount of $490,659.72, approve Minutes of the February 11, 2025 City Council Meeting, and receive and file the departmental reports – Finance Department. All in favor. Motion carried.

MAYOR’S PRESENTATIONS, PROCLAMATIONS, COMMUNICATIONS AND RESOLUTIONS PRESENTATION – GREENFIELD COMMUNITY CENTER/PARK DESIGN BY NJA ARCHITECTS John Vierra, NJA Architects, gave a power point presentation regarding the new community center.

John Huerta stated that the funding for the new community center was from Prop 68. He stated that when the grant application was approved the project was named Greenfield Recreation Center & Park and not Greenfield Community Center and would like it to be named by its original name. He stated that staff was proposing reduction of square footage; however, the Council should be given options. He stated that there was over $3 million dollars in ARPA money and over $2 million in the VW measures and these funds could help pay for the center. He stated that the presentation was a great presentation.

He stated that the current Community Center at Patriot Park had received two grants, HCD grants – one Federal and one State.

Noemi Chieco stated that she hoped that it would not take three years to complete and stated that the City did not need another soccer field and the park should include a Splash area and a playground that was inclusive.

Lucila Ayala stated that this was very much needed in the community and asked if there had been community input.
23 City Council Minutes
February 25, 2025
Page | 3
Gabby stated that she would like to request that the City fund the park and if the funds were available the City should fund the project so that the City does not lose the grant. She asked about having another soccer field and if the Council would consider putting up lights.

Beatriz Diaz stated that she hoped that the center would happen sooner rather than later.

Councilmember Garcia stated that the field was not a soccer field. Recreation Manager Perez stated that the field was a multi-purpose field and on the plan it showed a soccer field so that residents could know the size of the space.

Councilmember Ortiz asked for the timeline and funding for the project. Mr. Vierra explained the timeline and stated that they would be receiving $6 million from the grant and were also seeking additional funds in order to complete the project. He stated that once the funding was secured, the project was ready to go and hoping that something would occur by the end of the year.

PRESENTATION – MID-YEAR BUDGET REVIEW
City Manager Wood gave a power point presentation.

CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS

ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD APPROVING SUPPLEMENTALLY APPROPRIATING $61,162.60 FROM 503-390-85800 FROM FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024 TO FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025 FOR

THE PURCHASE OF TWO SEWER VEHICLES FOR THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT RESOLUTION #2025-12
Staff report was given by Public Works Director Tugel.

A MOTION by Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez, seconded by Councilmember Garcia to adopt Resolution #2025-12, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Approving Supplementally Appropriating $61,162.60 from 503-390-85800 from Fiscal Year 2023/2024 to Fiscal Year 2024/2025 for the Purchase of Two Sewer Vehicles for the Wastewater Treatment Plant”. All in favor. Motion carried.

ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD APPROVING TRANSFERRING WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $60,000 FROM 504-390-86211, BACKFLOW DEVICE REPLACEMENT TO 504-390-86201, WELL #7 IN ORDER TO REPAIR WELL #7 PUMP AND ASSOCIATED ELECTRICAL WORK
RESOLUTION #2025-13
Staff report was given by Public Works Director Tugel.

A MOTION by Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez, seconded by Councilmember Jones to adopt Resolution #2025-13, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Approving Transferring Water Capital Improvement Funds in the Amount of $60,000 from 504-390-86211, Backflow Device Replacement to 504-390-86201, Well #7 in Order to Repair Well #7 Pump and Associated Electrical Work”. All in favor. Motion carried.
24 City Council Minutes
February 25, 2025
Page | 4

ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD ESTABLISHING

THE POSITION OF PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR AND AMENDING THE UNREPRESENTED

SALARY SCHEDULE
RESOLUTION #2025-14
Staff report was given by City Manager Wood.

Lucila Ayala urged the Council to reconsider this and not establish the position of public safety director.

Noemi Chico stated that the City should have both positions and it would be a lot for Chief Mixer to administer both departments.

John Huerta asked if this was temporary or permanent and why does the Police Department have to have three raises to cover this. He stated that he was against this and that the Fire Department should have its ladder of personnel position so that one of them could move up. He stated that there maybe no one from the Fire Department that wanted to be the Fire Chief and maybe they wanted the Council to approve this; however, he did not know that. He suggested that the City Manager find ways to accomplish this within the department without getting the police department involved. He stated that it seemed that it was happening kind of quick and stated that it had taken a long time to establish both the Fire Department and Police Department to be respectable units.

Stephanie Garcia stated that the mid-year budget review showed that the budget was tight and at some point, the City needed to look at reality and look at the numbers as well as the needs of the community.

She stated that she would like to know what the Fire Department personnel thought of this and if they were in favor of it. .

Beatriz Diaz stated that she was against this and that both departments should be separated and both departments have very different responsibilities. She stated that this way could also be costly, and the Council needed to consider everything and recommended that this be put on hold at this time.

Councilmember Garcia asked if this decision was temporary. City Manager Wood stated that the decision that was made tonight would not be that difficult to undo if the Council decided that it was not in the best interest of the community. He stated that the intent at this time would be to see how this would work.

Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez stated that her concern was the actual impact that it would have on the actual firefighters. She stated that there were already three Fire Captains operating without a Deputy Chief and now they would be operating with a Chief that would only be doing approximately 20% of the administrative duties. She stated that the Fire Department was already operating in a structure that doesn’t have all the support that most other departments have. She stated that she did understand about budget also, however, did not believe that it should be the primary factory that should drive their decision, and that public safety should be the decision maker on this item. She stated that she had asked for a report on cities that were comparable to our size that have a similar position like this and how it worked in their cities as well as salary information; however, it was not in the report. She also stated that she felt that overall, the report was missing a lot of information and that information was needed to know what the real savings would be. She also stated that the Fire Captains should receive an increase if their duties were going to be increased. She asked about the administrative assistants for both the fire and police departments, and which one would get the raise and how the increase would be justified. City Manager Wood stated that the increase would be for the fire department administrative assistant because they would be doing more administrative duties and the police administrative assistant would not necessarily be doing more. She stated that she has heard from a lot of residents and stated that the Council had just passed a raise when Chief Mixer went from interim to permanent. She stated that she understood the 20% increase in pay and the responsibilities that were going to be added but would that 25 City Council Minutes
February 25, 2025
Page | 5
mean Chief Mixer would dedicate 20% to Fire and 80% to Police or how would the City spread one person to cover two departments. City Manager Wood explained that he was trying to pay a reasonable amount of money to take care of an executive staff position and it did not necessarily mean that he would take an additional 20% of his time. He stated that there was a list of tasks in three different programs that staff was looking at to try to allocate between people that were already here and a fire marshal. He stated that a lot of what was going on now was trying to figure out if this could work and how to save money. He stated that whether the Council decided to approve this or not, there was a lot of work that needed to go into looking at workloads and what needed to be done to be as effective and efficient as could be. Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez stated that she would like more information before making a decision and stated that she did not see the savings to justify the lack of a Fire Chief and place the additional duties for others. She stated that there were important factors that needed to be part of the public record before making a decision.

Councilmember Jones stated that if the Council does approve this she does not want staff to come back and request another position later.

Mayor White asked if this was done in other places. City Manager Wood stated yes and the savings were not small. He stated that he believed that Sunnyvale did this and that Seaside had done this in the early 2000s.

Councilmember Ortiz stated that she was okay trying this and stated that she believed that Chief Mixer could handle the work load.

A MOTION by Councilmember Ortiz to adopt Resolution #2025-14, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Establishing the Position of Public Safety Director and Amending the Unrepresented Salary Schedule”.

Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez stated that she would agree only if this would be until June 30, 2025. Mayor White stated that it would need to be at least until June, 30, 2026 because the Council needed to give it time to work. Councilmember Ortiz stated that it would take time to see if it worked; at least 6 months to a year. Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez stated that she would like this to come back with more information and would like to know what other cities paid.

A MOTION by Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez, seconded by Councilmember Jones to request more information prior to making a decision on this item. ROLL CALL VOTE: Councilmember Jones – Yes; Councilmember Garcia asked how long would the Council have to wait to get more information. Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez was requesting that the information come back by the next meeting.

Councilmember Garcia – Yes; Councilmember Ortiz – No;
Councilmember Jones stated that she thought she had seconded the motion by Councilmember Ortiz to pass Resolution #2025-14 and was not in favor of the motion made by Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez and withdrew her second to that motion.

Mayor White called for a second to the motion made by Mayor Pro-tem Rodrigez to request more information prior to making a decision on this item.

Motion died due to a lack of second.
26 City Council Minutes
February 25, 2025
Page | 6
A MOTION by Councilmember Ortiz, seconded by Councilmember Jones to adopt Resolution #2025- 14, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Greenfield Establishing the Position of Public Safety Director and Amending the Unrepresented Salary Schedule”. ROLL CALL VOTE:

Councilmember Jones – Yes; Councilmember Garcia – No; Councilmember Ortiz – Yes; Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez – No and Mayor White – Yes. Motion carried.

DISCUSS AND PROVIDE DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING ADVISORY BODY MEMBER

APPOINTMENT PROCESS
Power point presentation and staff report was given by City Attorney Thompson.

Gabby stated that the boards should not have different rules and all appointments should be opened to the public every time.

Mayor White stated that the first section made more sense and suggested that if Commissioner had served a three year term they should be able just to submit a letter; however, if they did not serve a full term they would have to fill an application and the position would be open to the public. Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez stated that she would like the position to be opened to the public every time. Councilmember Ortiz stated that the Council made the appointments and if the Commissioner was not doing a good job then they would not be re-appointed.

There was additional discussion among the Council and staff regarding this item.

It was the consensus of the Council to change the advisory body member appointment process, Planning Commission only to include: when an incumbent wants to serve again they need to submit a letter by November 15th of the year that their term was expiring and if a letter was submitted, Council would consider re-appointment at their first meeting in December. If a letter was not submitted, the clerk or the planning director would put out a recruitment and the Council would consider the applications and appointment the first meeting in December. Also, eliminate the language that states that the appointment to fill a vacancy before the end of the term is for three years but rather they’ll fill the vacancy for the remainder of the term and if they have served less than 6 months the Commissioner could not submit an incumbent letter and the vacancy is opened to the public. The Parks & Recreation Advisory Board rules would not change.

BRIEF REPORTS ON CONFERENCES, SEMINARS, AND MEETINGS ATTENDED BY MAYOR AND

CITY COUNCIL
Councilmember Ortiz reported on the TAMC meeting and stated that the tree removal project near the Red Barn was completed and they removed about 300 trees.

Mayor White reported on the AMBAG meeting and stated that they discussed the 2025 Coordinated Public Transit – Human Services Transportation Plan Development process and the 2050 Metropolitan Transportation plan.

Mayor Pro-tem Rodriguez reported on the MST meeting. She stated that F. Loduca was awarded the contract to build the bus stops for the route in Greenfield. She also stated that they presented a recognition and appreciation award to Anna Velasquez and a “Roadeo” award to Mike LeBarre. She stated that the Board asked MST to consider an alternative to the on-call services once the on-call service was stopped. City Manager Wood stated that ITN Monterey County would be doing a presentation regarding on-call services at the next meeting. 27 City Council Minutes
February 25, 2025
Page | 7
City Manager Wood reported on the Mayors and Managers meeting and stated that they discussed a regional animal control concept for the four south county cities and a location for the services: AB 413 curb painting and the homelessness situation and its options.

CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
No report.

CITY MANAGER REPORT
City Manager Wood announced that the Team Building Workshop would on March 19, 2025.

ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 8:48 p.m.
_________________________
Mayor of the City of Greenfield
____________________________
City Clerk of the City of Greenfield
28 No. of Building Inspections 82 Planning Projects to Hearing 1 Building Permit Applications Processed 52 New Planning Applications Received 2 No.of Building Permits Issued 25 Regulatory Permit Renewal Application 1 No. of Building Permits Finaled 14 Renewal Letter 1
Total Valuation of Building Permits $ 3,661,098 Plan Reviews 12 Total Permit & Impact Fees Collected $ 26,878
New ADU Applications Received 3 Reporting to outside agencies completed:

Certificates of Occupancy issued 1 AMBAG Opportunity Areas CA Dept of Water - MWELO Report
Plan Review Fee collected $ 10,334
Administrative Fee collected $ 2,739 EV Climate Adaptation & Resilience Meeting Building Permit Fees collected $ 12,961 Planning Commission Meeting Water Meter Fees collected $ 404 WASP Final Map Meeting Department Training fee $ 429 AMBAG Planning Directors Forum Stron Motion Fee collected $ -
CA Building Standards Commission fee collected $ 11 Advanced Planning TOTAL $ 26,878 Request for Proposal (RFP) for Nexus Study on Impact Fees Impact Fees Collected CDBG Applications Ranking
Community Center Impact Fee collected $ - Annual Progress Report (APR) Contract/ Data Collection Fire Impact Fee collected $ - Housing Element Passback
General Facilities Impact Fee collected $ - General Plan Progress Park Impact Fee collected $ -
Police Impact Fee collected $ -
Sewer Impact Fee collected $ -
TAMC fees $ -
Traffice Impact Fee collected $ -
Water Impact Fee collected $ -
TOTAL $ -
*no impact fees collected for Feb 2025
ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MONTHLY REPORT FEBRUARY 2025

BUILDING PLANNING
Permit fees collected
29 94
City Council Memorandum 599 El Camino Real Greenfield CA 93937 831-674-5591 www.ci.greenfield.ca.us
DATE: March 4, 2025
AGENDA DATE: March 11, 2025
TO: Mayor and City Council
PREPARED BY: Guillermo Mixer, Director of Public Safety TITLE: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF GREENFIELD ACCEPTING THE

GREENFIELD WILDFIRE PREVENTION

GRANT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT

WITH THE STATE OF CALIFRONIA

BACKGROUND
Last year the Greenfield Fire Department (GFD) was awarded a wildfire prevention grant through the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. On December 10, 2024, Fire Chief Langborg brought the matter to the city council where the grant was accepted, and the requested appropriations were made.

While reviewing the grant prior to signing, we found an additional area, Reliz Canyon, that would benefit from vegetation and wildfire reduction. Working with CalFire, the grant administrators, we added Reliz Canyon to the Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Program (GWPP).

In addition, CalFire identified some verbiage that was needed in the resolution previously approved by Greenfield City Council. Specifically, indicating the city manager or his designee to, “to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project.”
Again, the objective of the grant is to fund projects that will decrease the likelihood of vegetation fires in the areas of the Salinas River and Reliz Canyon. Specifically, the grant is intended to reduce fuels and help property owners mitigate hazards on their property. While the geographic locations affected by the grant sit inside of the unincorporated Greenfield Fire Protection District, the project will be overseen by the City of Greenfield Fire Department who contracts their services to the Greenfield Fire Protection District.

FINANCIAL AND BUDGET IMPACT
None, as the Grant is in the amount of $189,263.74, and there is no matching requirement on behalf of the city.
30 95

RECOMMENDATION
Approve and appropriate the Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Grant.

PROPOSED MOTION
I MOVE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION #2025-15, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD ACCEPTING THE GREENFIELD

WILDFIRE PREVENTION GRANT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFRONIA
31 32
RESOLUTION 2025-15

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD ACCEPTING THE

GREENFIELD WILDFIRE PREVENTION GRANT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, the Governor of the State of California in cooperation with the California State Legislature has enacted State of California Climate Investment, which provides funds to the State of California and its political subdivisions for fire prevention programs; and WHEREAS, the State Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program within the State, setting up necessary procedures governing application by local agencies, non-profit organizations, and others under the program; and WHEREAS, the applicant will enter into an agreement with the State of California to carry out the Hillside Natural Area Hazardous Fuels Reduction Project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Greenfield:

1. Approves the filing of an application for “California Climate Investments Wildfire Prevention Grants Program”; and,

2. Certifies that the City has sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project; and,

3. Certifies that funds under the jurisdiction of the City of Greenfield are available to begin the project; and,

4. Appoints the City Manager or a designee, to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 11th day of March 2025 by the following vote:

AYES, and all in favor, therefore, Councilmember:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:
________________________
Robert White, Mayor
Attest:
________________________
Ann F. Rathbun, City Clerk
33 STATE OF CALIFORNIA NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY Gavin Newsom, Governor “The Department of Forestry and Fire Protection serves and safeguards the people and protects the property and resources of California.”

DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION
P.O. Box 944246
SACRAMENTO, CA 94244-2460
(916) 653-7772
Website: www.fire.ca.gov
February 26, 2025
Jim Langborg
City of Greenfield
380 Oak Avenue
Greenfield, CA 93927
5GG23231; “Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan”
This Agreement cannot be considered binding on either party until approved by appropriate authorized CAL FIRE designee. No services should be provided prior to approval, as the State is not obligated to make any payments on any Agreement prior to final approval. FAILURE TO RETURN ALL DOCUMENTS BY DATE BELOW MAY RESULT IN LOSS OF FUNDING.

Please contact Tim Montgomery at (831) 601-6547 if you have questions concerning services to be performed.

1. 2.

Full grant agreement including terms and conditions, project grant application form, scope of work, budget, map, and other exhibits enclosed. Please sign, scan, and return the agreement to Bobby Nguyen at [email protected] no later than March 7, 2025.

Alternatively, you may opt to print (single sided), sign in blue ink, and return the agreement with original signature to:

CAL FIRE
Attn: Grants Management Unit/WP Grants
P.O. Box 944246
Sacramento, CA 94244-2460
In order to expedite your agreement, a scanned/electronic signature copy of the agreement is preferred.

Enclosed for your record is one fully executed copy of the agreement referenced above. When billing for services performed under this agreement, your invoices must reference the agreement number above and be submitted to the contract manager.

Thank you,
Bobby Nguyen
Grants Analyst
Grants Management Unit
Enclosures
34 State of California
Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE)
Office of the State Fire Marshal

GRANT AGREEMENT
APPLICANT: City of Greenfield
PROJECT TITLE: Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan
GRANT AGREEMENT: 5GG23231
PROJECT PERFORMANCE PERIOD is from date of latter signature by CAL FIRE Deputy Director or Grantee through March 15, 2030.

Under the terms and conditions of this Grant Agreement, the applicant agrees to complete the project as described in the project description, and the State of California, acting through the Department of Forestry & Fire Protection, agrees to fund the project up the total state grant amount indicated.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Develop a comprehensive Localized Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) and a Salinas Valley Fuel Modification Zone Plan designed to address the specific environmental and demographic characteristics of Greenfield. The intent of the Localized CWPP is to mitigate the risk of wildfires, enhance local ecosystem health, protect critical infrastructure, and boost the safety of residents and first responders in the event of a wildfire. The project plan includes several critical tasks that will guide the City from Wildfire Prevention Planning to future implementation of Hazardous Fuels Reduction.

Total State Grant not to exceed $ 189,263.74 (or project costs, whichever is less). *The Special and General Provisions attached are made a part of and incorporated into this Grant Agreement.

City of Greenfield

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY

AND FIRE PROTECTION
Applicant
By By
Signature of Authorized Representative
Print Name/
Title: Title: Frank Bigelow, State Fire Marshal
Date Date

CERTIFICATION OF FUNDING

GRANT AGREEMENT NUMBER PO ID SUPPLIER ID
5GG23231

FUND FUND NAME
3228 Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund

PROJECT ID
24WFFPGRANTS

ACTIVITY ID
GRANTS

AMOUNT OF ESTIMATE FUNDING
$ 189,263.74

GL UNIT
3540

BUD REF
102
ADJ. INCREASING ENCUMBRANCE
$ 0.00
PROGRAM NUMBER ENY ADJ. DECREASING ENCUMBRANCE
2465010 2024 $ 0.00

ACCOUNT
5340580

ALT ACCOUNT
5340580000

UNENCUMBERED BALANCE
$ 189,263.74

REPORTING STRUCTURE
35405909

SERVICE LOCATION
91049
Acknowledged - I hereby certify upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance.

Certification of CAL FIRE Accounting Officer Date
35 GRANT NUMBER 5GG23231
City of Greenfield
Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan
1 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF GRANT AGREEMENT
I. RECITALS

1. This Agreement, is entered into between the State of California, by and through the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE), hereinafter referred to as “STATE” and, City of Greenfield, hereinafter referred to as “GRANTEE”.

2. The STATE hereby grants to GRANTEE a sum (hereinafter referred to as “GRANT FUNDS”) not to exceed One Hundred Eighty Nine Thousand Two Hundred Sixty Three Dollars and Seventy Four Cents ($189,263.74).

3. In addition to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the STATE and GRANTEE agree that the terms and conditions contained in the documents set forth below are hereby incorporated and made part of this agreement. a. California Climate Investments Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Wildfire Prevention Grants Program Procedural Guide FY 2023-2024 b. The submitted Application, Scope of Work, Project Workbook, GHG Emissions Workbook and Exhibits
c. ADDENDUM – CALIFORNIA CLIMATE INVESTMENTS (CCI) GRANT

PROJECTS
II. SPECIAL PROVISIONS

1. Recipients of GRANT FUNDS pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section §4124.5 shall abide by the provisions in this Agreement. This includes the requirement that work shall not commence prior to the execution of this Agreement by both parties. Any work started prior to the execution of this Agreement will not be eligible for funding under the terms of this Agreement.

2. As precedent to the STATE’s obligation to provide funding, GRANTEE shall provide to the STATE for review and approval a detailed budget, specifications, and project description. Approval by the STATE of such plans and specifications, or any other approvals provided for in this Agreement, shall be for scope and quality of work, and shall not relieve GRANTEE of the obligation to carry out any other obligations required by this Agreement, in accordance with applicable law or any other standards ordinarily applied to such work or activity.

3. All informational products (e.g., data, studies, findings, management plans, manuals, photos, etc.) relating to California’s natural environment produced with the use of GRANT FUNDS shall be available for public use. 36 GRANT NUMBER 5GG23231
City of Greenfield
Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan
2 III. GENERAL PROVISIONS

1. Definitions
a. The term “Agreement” means grant agreement number 5GG23231. b. The term “GRANT FUNDS” means the money provided by the STATE to the GRANTEE in this Agreement.
c. The term “GRANTEE” means an applicant who has a signed Agreement for the award for GRANT FUNDS.
d. The term “Other Sources of Funds” means all matching fund sources that are required or used to complete the Project beyond the GRANT FUNDS provided by this Agreement.
e. The term “STATE” means the State of California, Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE).
f. The term “Project” means the development or other activity described in the “Project Scope of Work”.
g. The term “Project Budget Detail” as used herein defines the approved budget plan.
h. The term “Project Scope of Work” as used herein means the individual scope of work describing in detail the approved tasks.

2. Project Representatives
The project representatives during the term of the agreement will be:

STATE: CAL FIRE GRANTEE: City of Greenfield
Section/Unit: BEU Section/Unit: N/A
Attention: Tim Montgomery Attention: Jim Langborg
Mailing Address:
2221 Garden Road
Monterey, CA 93940
Mailing Address:
380 Oak Avenue
Greenfield, CA 93927
Phone Number: (831) 601-6547 Phone Number: (831) 674-5484 Email Address:
[email protected]
Email Address:
[email protected]
37 GRANT NUMBER 5GG23231
City of Greenfield
Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan
3 Changes to the project representatives during the term of the agreement shall be made in writing. Notice shall be sent to the above representative for all notice provisions of this Agreement.

3. Project Execution
a. Subject to the availability of grant monies, the STATE hereby grants to the GRANTEE a sum of money (GRANT FUNDS) not to exceed the amount stated on Section I. RECITALS, Paragraph 2 in consideration of and on condition that the sum be expended in carrying out the purposes as set forth in the description of the Project in this Agreement and its attachments and under the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.
b. GRANTEE shall assume any obligation to furnish any additional funds that may be necessary to complete the Project. Any amendment to the Project as set forth in the Application on file with the STATE must be submitted to the STATE for approval in writing. No amendment is allowed until written approval is given by the STATE.
c. GRANTEE shall complete the Project in accordance with the time of Project performance set forth in this Agreement, unless an amendment has been approved and signed by the STATE under the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Amendments must be requested in advance and will be considered in the event of circumstances beyond the control of the GRANTEE, but no less than 60 days from the Agreement expiration date. The STATE may waive the minimum timeframe for amendments at their discretion. Approval of amendment is at the STATE’s discretion.
d. GRANTEE certifies that the Project Scope of Work complies with all local, State, and federal laws and regulations.
e. GRANTEE shall comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code, Section 21000, et. seq. Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Section 15000 et. seq.) and all other local, State, and federal environmental laws. A copy of the certified CEQA document must be provided to STATE before any GRANT FUNDS are made available for any Project activity that could directly impact the environment (e.g. cutting, piling or burning bush, masticating, dozer work, etc.). CEQA compliance shall be completed within one (1) year from start date of the Agreement. The start date is considered the latter date of signature by the Grantee Authorized Representative or CAL FIRE Deputy Director. GRANT FUNDS will be made available in advance of CEQA compliance for project activities that do not have the potential to cause a direct environmental impact (e.g. project planning, locating and marking 38 GRANT NUMBER 5GG23231
City of Greenfield
Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan
4 property or project boundaries, contacting and signing up landowners, etc.).
f. GRANTEE shall permit periodic site visits by representative(s) of the STATE to ensure program compliance and that work is in accordance with the approved Project Scope of Work, including a final inspection upon Project completion.
g. GRANTEE, and the agents and employees of GRANTEE, in the performance of this Agreement, shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers, employees, or agents, of the STATE. No person who, as an officer, employee, or agent of the STATE participated in the preparation or creation of or determination to award this Grant Agreement shall serve as an agent or employee of GRANTEE including but not limited to those acts prohibited by Government Code Sections 1090, and 87100.

4. Project Costs and Payment Documentation
a. Payment by the STATE shall be made after receipt of an acceptable invoice and approval by a duly authorized representative of the STATE.

GRANTEE shall submit an invoice for payment to the CAL FIRE Project Representative of the STATE. A final invoice shall be submitted no later than 30 days after completion, expiration, or termination of this Agreement.
b. For services satisfactorily rendered, and upon receipt and approval of invoices for payment, the STATE agrees to compensate GRANTEE for actual expenditures incurred in accordance with the rates and activities specified in the Final Project Budget Detail, Application, Scope of Work and Exhibits, and made a part of this Agreement.
c. Equipment purchased using GRANT FUNDS, wholly or in part, must be used by the GRANTEE for the project for which it was acquired. STATE retains a vested interest in the equipment for the useful life of the equipment, even after completion of the grant. GRANTEE shall provide written disposition of the equipment upon completion of the grant and upon any changes to the disposition of the equipment. Such disposition must be approved in advance by STATE. Equipment purchased using GRANT FUNDS cannot be used as collateral, financed, or sold without prior written approval from the STATE. Grantee must provide reporting on equipment disposition no less frequently than biannually to CAL FIRE or upon CAL FIRE’s request after completion of the grant project until notified in writing by the CAL FIRE Wildfire Prevention Grant Program that additional reporting is no longer required.
39 GRANT NUMBER 5GG23231
City of Greenfield
Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan
5 d. GRANTEE shall submit, in arrears, not more frequently than once a month, and required quarterly, an invoice to the STATE for costs paid by GRANTEE pursuant to this Agreement. In the event no expenses are incurred, GRANTEE shall identify that no costs have been incurred within the respective quarterly progress report in lieu of submitting a zero balance invoice. Each invoice shall contain the following information: the Agreement number, the dates or time period during which the invoiced costs were incurred, signature of an authorized representative of GRANTEE, expenditures for the current invoice and cumulative expenditures to date by major budget category (e.g., salaries, benefits, supplies, etc.), match funds when applicable, and appropriate supporting documentation consistent with the Project Costs section, as detailed in the California Climate Investments Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Wildfire Prevention Grants Program Procedural Guide 2022- 2023.
e. GRANT FUNDS in this Agreement have a limited period in which they must be expended. All GRANTEE expenditures must occur prior to the end of the Project performance period of this Agreement. f. Except as otherwise provided herein, GRANTEE shall expend GRANT FUNDS in the manner described in the Budget approved by the STATE.

The dollar amount of an item in a budget category may be increased or decreased by up to ten percent (10%) of the budget item through reallocation of funds from other budget categories, without approval by the STATE; however, GRANTEE shall notify the STATE in writing when any such reallocation is made, and shall identify both the item(s) being increased and those being decreased. Any increase or decrease of an item of more than ten percent (10%) of the budget category must be approved in writing by the STATE before any such increase or decrease is made. A formal approved amendment is required to increase the total amount of GRANT FUNDS.
g. GRANTEE shall promptly submit any and all records at the time and in the form as the STATE may request.
h. GRANTEE shall submit each invoice for payment electronically using the grants management system identified by CAL FIRE. Hard copy submissions will not be accepted.
i. Notwithstanding any of the provisions stated within this Agreement, the STATE may at its discretion make advance payment from the grant awarded to the GRANTEE if GRANTEE is a nonprofit organization, a local agency, a special district, a private forest landowner or a Native American tribe. Advance payment made by the STATE shall be subject to the following provisions.
40 GRANT NUMBER 5GG23231
City of Greenfield
Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan
6 • GRANTEE shall submit a written request identifying how funds will be used over a six-month period. The written request must be accompanied by an invoice that contains the same level of detail as a regular invoice.
• GRANTEE shall file an accountability report with STATE four months from the date of receiving the funds and every four months thereafter.
• Multiple advance payments may be made to a GRANTEE over the life of a project.
• No single advance payment shall exceed 25% of the total grant amount. For grants funding equipment, the maximum advance request may be increased up to 50% of the total grant amount or cost of equipment purchase, whichever is less. Advance funds and must be spent on eligible costs within six months of the advance payment receipt.
• GRANTEE may request additional time to spend advance funds but must be approved in writing by the STATE. CAL FIRE will bill for the return of unliquidated advance funds after the approved timeframe..
• All work under a previous advance payment must be fully liquidated via an invoice and supporting documentation and completed to the STATE’s satisfaction before another advance payment will be made.
• Any advance payment received by a GRANTEE and not used for project eligible costs within the time period approved by STATE shall be returned to the STATE. The amount will be returned to the grant balance.
• Advance payments must be deposited into an interest-bearing account. Any interest earned on advance payment funds must be accounted for and used toward offsetting the project cost or returned to the STATE.
j. The GRANTEE shall immediately reimburse or credit, as determined by the STATE, the STATE for any over payment of any invoice, including final invoice, when either party determines an overpayment was made.

5. Budget Contingency Clause
a. If STATE funding for any fiscal year is reduced or deleted for purposes of the Wildfire Prevention Program California Climate Investments Grant Program, the STATE shall have the option to either cancel this Agreement with no liability occurring to the STATE, or if possible and desirable, offer an Agreement amendment to GRANTEE to reflect the reduced amount available for the Project.
41 GRANT NUMBER 5GG23231
City of Greenfield
Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan
7 6. Project Administration
a. GRANTEE must report to the STATE all sources of other funds for the Project. If this provision is deemed to be violated, the STATE will request an audit of GRANTEE and can delay the disbursement of funds until the matter is resolved.
b. GRANTEE shall promptly submit written Project reports as the STATE may request throughout the term of this Agreement.
c. GRANTEE shall submit a final accomplishment report, final invoice with associated supporting documentation, and copies of materials developed using GRANT FUNDS, including but not limited to plans, educational materials, etc. within 30 days of Project completion.

7. Financial Records
a. GRANTEE shall retain all records described in Section 7(c) below for three (3) years after final payment by the STATE. In the case an audit occurs, all such records shall be retained for one (1) year from the date the audit is completed or the three (3) years, whichever date is later. b. GRANTEE shall maintain satisfactory financial accounts, documents, and records for the Project and make them available to the STATE for review during reasonable times. This includes the right to inspect and make copies of any books, records, or reports of GRANTEE pertaining to this Agreement or matters related thereto.
c. GRANTEE shall keep such records as the STATE shall prescribe, including, but not limited to, records which fully disclose (a) the disposition of the proceeds of state funding assistance, (b) the total cost of the Project in connection with such assistance that is given or used, (c) the amount and nature of that portion of the Project cost supplied by other sources, and (d) any other such records as will facilitate an effective audit. All records shall be made available to the STATE, other State of California agency, or other entity as determined by the State of California for auditing purposes at reasonable times.
d. GRANTEE shall use any generally accepted accounting system.

8. Research
a. GRANTEE that receives funding, in whole or in part, in the form of a research grant shall provide for free public access to any publication of a peer-reviewed manuscript describing STATE funded knowledge, STATE 42 GRANT NUMBER 5GG23231
City of Greenfield
Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan
8 funded invention, or STATE funded technology shall be subject to the following conditions:
i. GRANTEE is responsible for ensuring that any publishing or copyright agreements concerning peer-reviewed manuscripts fully comply with this section
ii. GRANTEE shall report to STATE the final disposition of the peerreviewed manuscript, including, but not limited to, if it was published, date of publication, where it was published, and, when the 12-month time period from official date of publication expires, where the peer-reviewed manuscript will be available for open access.
b. For a peer-reviewed manuscript that is accepted for publication pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the GRANTEE shall ensure that an electronic version of the peer-reviewed manuscript is available to STATE and on an appropriate publicly accessible repository approved by the state agency, including, but not limited to, the University of California’s eScholarship Repository at the California Digital Library, the California State University’s ScholarWorks at the Systemwide Digital Library, or PubMed Central, to be made publicly available not later than 12 months after the official date of publication. GRANTEE shall make reasonable efforts to comply with this requirement by ensuring that the peer-reviewed manuscript is accessible on an approved publicly accessible repository, including notifying the state agency that the manuscript is available on a state-agency-approved repository. If the grantee is unable to ensure that his or her manuscript is accessible on an approved, publicly accessible repository, the grantee may comply by providing the manuscript to the state agency not later than 12 months after the official date of publication. c. For publications other than those described in (b), including scientific meeting abstracts, GRANTEE shall comply by providing the manuscript to the STATE not later than 12 months after the official date of publication. d. The grant shall not be construed to authorize use of a peer-reviewed manuscript that would constitute an infringement of copyright under the federal copyright law described in Section 101 of Title 17 of the United States Code and following.
e. Use of GRANT FUNDS for publication costs, including fees charged by a publisher for color and page charges, or fees for digital distribution are allowable costs but must be within the GRANT FUNDS and item 4 of the agreement.
43 GRANT NUMBER 5GG23231
City of Greenfield
Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan
9 f. GRANTEE may request a waiver to the publication requirement if GRANTEE has an existing publication requirement that meets or exceeds the requirements of the research provision. Waiver shall include information on GRANTEE’s existing requirements. Approval of the waiver is at STATE’s discretion.

9. Project Termination
a. This Agreement may be terminated by the STATE or GRANTEE upon 30- days written notice to the other party.
b. If either party terminates the Agreement prior to the completion of the Project, GRANTEE shall take all reasonable measures to prevent further costs to the STATE under the Agreement and the STATE shall be responsible for any reasonable and non-cancelable obligations incurred by GRANTEE in the performance of this Agreement prior to the date of the notice to terminate, but only up to the undisbursed balance of funding authorized in this Agreement.
c. Failure by GRANTEE to comply with the terms of this Agreement may be cause for suspension of all obligations of the STATE hereunder at the discretion of the STATE.
d. Failure of GRANTEE to comply with the terms of this Agreement shall not be cause for the suspension of all obligations of the STATE hereunder if in the judgment of the STATE such failure was due to no fault of GRANTEE.

At the discretion of the STATE, any amount required to settle at minimum cost any irrevocable obligations properly incurred shall be eligible for reimbursement under this Agreement.
e. Final payment to GRANTEE may not be made until the STATE determines the Project conforms substantially to this Agreement.

10. Hold Harmless
a. GRANTEE shall defend, indemnify and hold the STATE, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from and against any and all liability, loss, expense (including reasonable attorney's fees), or claims for injury or damages arising out of the performance of this Agreement but only in proportion to and to the extent such liability, loss, expense, attorney's fees, or claims for injury or damages are caused by or result from the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of GRANTEE, its officers, agents, or employees. The duty of GRANTEE to indemnify and hold harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in Civil Code Section 2778. This Agreement supersedes GRANTEE’s right as a public entity to indemnity 44 GRANT NUMBER 5GG23231
City of Greenfield
Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan
10 (see Government Code Section 895.2) and contribution (see Government Code Section 895.6) as set forth in Government Code Section 895.4. b. GRANTEE waives any and all rights to any type of express or implied indemnity or right of contribution from the STATE, its officers, agents, or employees for any liability resulting from, growing out of, or in any way connected with or incident to this Agreement.
c. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to create in the public or in any member of it rights as a third-party beneficiary under this Agreement.

11. Tort Claims
FEDERAL:

The United States shall be liable, to the extent allowed by the Federal Tort Claims Act 28 United States Code 2671-2680, for claims of personal injuries or property damage resulting from the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the United States while acting within the scope of his or her employment, arising out of this Agreement.

STATE:

The State of California shall be liable, to the extent allowed by law and subject to California Government Code, Title 1, Division 3.6, providing for the filing of tort claims against the State of California, for personal injuries or property damage resulting from the negligent or wrongful act or omission of State of California employees while acting within the scope of his or her employment, arising out of this Agreement.

12. Nondiscrimination
The State of California prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, marital status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. GRANTEE shall not discriminate against any person on any of these bases.

13. Conflict of Interest
GRANTEE or anyone acting on behalf of GRANTEE shall not have any conflicting personal and/or financial interests in carrying out the duties of the Agreement.
45 GRANT NUMBER 5GG23231
City of Greenfield
Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan
11 14. Incorporation
The grant guidelines and the Project Scope of Work, Project Budget Detail and any subsequent amendments or modifications to the Project Scope of Work and Project Budget Detail approved in writing by the STATE are hereby incorporated by reference into this Agreement as though set forth in full in this Agreement.

15. Severability
If any provision of this Agreement or the Project Scope of Work thereof is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Agreement which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Agreement are severable.

16. Waiver
No term or provision hereof will be considered waived by either party, and no breach excused by either party, unless such waiver or consent is in writing and signed on behalf of the party against whom the waiver is asserted. No consent by either party to, or waiver of, a breach by either party, whether expressed or implied, will constitute consent to, waiver of, or excuse of any other, different, or subsequent breach by either party.

17. Assignment
This Agreement is not assignable by GRANTEE either in whole or in part.

18. Survival Clause
The obligations of the Parties under Section III General Provisions, Items 4 (c) and (j) of the Project Costs and Payment Documentation and Item 10 Hold Harmless of this Agreement shall survive the termination or expiration of the Agreement.
46 GRANT NUMBER 5GG23231
City of Greenfield
Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan
1 ADDENDUM – CALIFORNIA CLIMATE INVESTMENTS (CCI) GRANT PROJECTS I. SPECIAL PROVISIONS

1. Grant funds shall be used on projects with the primary goal of reducing greenhouse gases (GHGs) and furthering the purposes of California’s Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, Division 25.5 (commencing with Section 38500) of the Health and Safety Code, and related statutes.

2. Grant funds shall be used on projects limited to specific activities as described in CCI Grants Procedural Guides.

3. Grantee shall report project and benefits information when requested by the State.

This may include, but is not limited to, funding expended, acres treated, GHG emissions, trees planted, disadvantaged community benefits, energy/water savings, job creation, and other co-benefits.

4. Grantee shall maintain accurate and detailed records documenting project description, project location, and schedule, CCI dollars allocated, and leveraged funds throughout the duration of the project.

5. Failure of Grantee to meet the agreed upon terms of achieving required GHG reduction may result in project termination and recovery of funds.

II. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
All funds expended through CCI are subject to emissions reporting and requirements.

Grantee is expected to provide the appropriate materials for completing program quantification methodology. Grantee shall use the current reporting template provided by the STATE. The reporting shall be submitted to the STATE no less frequently than quarterly. In addition, STATE may request additional information in order to meet current CARB reporting requirements. The requirements are available on the CARB CCI Quantification, Benefits and Reporting Materials webpage:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/documents/cci-quantification-benefits-and-reportingmaterials. 47 GRANT NUMBER 5GG23231
City of Greenfield
Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan
2 III. PROGRAM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT/RECOGNITION

1. All projects funded both fully and partially by the GGRF must clearly display, identify and label themselves as being part of the “California Climate Investments” program. The acknowledgement must contain the California Climate Investments and CAL FIRE logos as well as the following statement:
“Funding for this project provided by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection’s (CAL FIRE) Wildfire Prevention Grants Program as part of the California Climate Investments Program.”
A draft of the acknowledgement must be approved by the STATE prior to publication.

For stationary projects, acknowledgement may include, but is not limited to, a sign on the project site. For other project types, such as vehicles, equipment, and consumer-based incentives, acknowledgement is encouraged by using a decal, sticker or other signage.

Guidance on California Climate Investments logo usage, signage guidelines, and high-resolution files are contained in a style guide available at:
www.caclimateinvestments.ca.gov/logo-graphics-request.

2. In addition, all projects funded both fully and partially by GGRF must contain the following statement in public announcements or press releases on said projects:
“Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan, is part of California Climate Investments, a statewide program that puts billions of Cap-and-Trade dollars to work reducing GHG emissions, strengthening the economy, and improving public health and the environment– particularly in disadvantaged communities. The Cap-and-Trade program also creates a financial incentive for industries to invest in clean technologies and develop innovative ways to reduce pollution. California Climate Investments projects include affordable housing, renewable energy, public transportation, zero-emission vehicles, environmental restoration, more sustainable agriculture, recycling, and much more. At least 35 percent of these investments are located within and benefiting residents of disadvantaged communities, low-income communities, and low-income households across California. For more information, visit the California Climate Investments website at:
www.caclimateinvestments.ca.gov.”
48 23-WP-BEU- 59266418
Application Form :

Profile : [email protected]
Project Information
Project Name/Title : Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan In which county is the majority of your project located? : Monterey County The full Project Tracking Number will be auto-generated within Grants Portal. Please use the format 23-WPUUU and replace your 3-character unit identifier from your selected county above. : 23-WP-BEUAre there additional counties? : No Did you have communication with CAL FIRE about this project? : Yes In which California State Assembly district(s) is your project located? :
29th - Monterey, San Benito, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz
30th - Monterey, San Luis Obispo, Santa Cruz
In which California State Senate district(s) is your project located? :
17th - Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Cruz Project End Date : 2030-03-15
Project Description Summary
Please provide a paragraph summarizing proposed project including the location, habitable structures, acres treated, etc. : The Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan project is a comprehensive initiative to enhance wildfire resilience in and around Greenfield, California, by developing the Greenfield Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) and the Salinas Valley Fuel Modification Plan (FMP). Located in the heart of the Salinas River Valley, this project will encompass a 540-acre geographic area, extending from areas between the City of Soledad to King City. Within the scope, the project will prepare a plan to minimize wildfire risks to approximately 65 structures and the treatment of approximately 540 acres. The project will involve various activities, including extensive data collection and analysis, community engagement and outreach, development of mitigation strategies, and preparing necessary environmental documents in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Completing the CWPP and FMP will position the City and its high-risk surrounding areas to implement wildfire mitigation strategies to safeguard the community, preserve the natural landscape, and enhance the overall resilience of the region against the threat of wildfires.

Award Request Amount
Total Amount of Award Request : $189,263.74
8/9/24, 3:20 PM about:blank
about:blank 1/5
49 Indirect Cost Rate
Are you requesting an Indirect Cost Rate in excess of 12%? : No Organization Information
Organization Type : Incorporated Cities and Counties
Board Resolution or Attesting Document : 23-WP-BEU-59266418-Unsigned Resolution.docx Applicant Name/Sponsoring Organization : City of Greenfield Project Manager Name : Jim Langborg
Project Manager Mailing Address : 380 Oak Avenue
Project Manager Mailing Address Line 2 :

City : Greenfield
State : US-CA
Zip Code : 93927
Project Manager Phone Number : (831) 674-5484
Project Manager Email : [email protected]
Project Activities
For which primary activity is funding being requested? : Wildfire Prevention Planning Wildfire Prevention Planning Document : Community Plans Developed (New) Project Treatment Area
Primary Land Ownership Class : Local Government
Does your project include work on Tribal Lands? : No
Limiting Factors: Check the box if there are any existing forest or land management plans; Conservation Easements; Covenant, Conditions & Restrictions (CC&R’s); matters related to zoning; use restrictions, or other factors that can or will limit the fire prevention proposed activity? :

Timber Harvest Plans (THP): For Hazardous Fuels Reduction projects, If there is a timber harvesting document on any portion of the proposed project area for which a “Notice of Completion” has not been filed with CAL FIRE check the box. :
8/9/24, 3:20 PM about:blank
about:blank 2/5
50 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Compliance: Describe how compliance with CEQA will be achieved in the Scope of Work.

Is there an existing CEQA document that addresses this project or can be used to meet CEQA requirements?
Please indicate the CEQA document type (For planning, education and other projects that are exempt from CEQA, select “Not Applicable”) : Not Applicable
Existing Document Identification Number : N/A
Federal Responsibility Area: Does your project include work on Federal Lands that might require a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) document, or use a framework similar to Good Neighbor Authority? : No Community Metrics
Fire Risk Reduction Community List (FRRC)
Is the Sponsoring Organization a local agency? ( city, county, or other publicly funded entity serving a city and/or county) : Yes
If yes, please select from the Fire Risk Reduction Community List options : Not on the FRRC list If yes, is the Sponsoring Organization reporting defensible space data to CAL FIRE? : No Community at Risk: Is the project associated with a community that is listed as a Community at Risk? : Yes Number of Risk Communities in the project area : 3
Disadvantaged/Low Income Community: Is the project associated with a disadvantaged/low-income community? : Yes
If Yes, select all that applies: :

Low Income
Project Area Statistics: For all Hazardous Fuels Reduction projects, provide an estimate of the Treatment Influence Zone (TIZ) acres.

Include Local Responsibility Area (LRA), Federal Responsibility Area (FRA) and State Responsibility Area (SRA) as applicable for TIZ.

The Treatment Influence Zones (TIZ) are the treatment areas within a project, where on-the-ground activities are accomplished. There can be multiple treatment areas associated with a project. Wildfire Prevention Planning and Wildfire Prevention Public Education projects will NOT have treatment areas.

Local Responsibility Area (LRA) Treatment acres : 0.00
Federal Responsibility Area (FRA) Treatment acres : 0.00 State Responsibility Area (SRA) Treatment acres : 0.00
Total Treatment Acres : 0
8/9/24, 3:20 PM about:blank
about:blank 3/5
51 Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ)
What Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) are in the project area? Fire Hazard Severity Zone ratings are available at: https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/what-we-do/community-wildfire-preparedness-and-mitigation/fire-hazard-severity-zones (https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/what-we-do/community-wildfire-preparedness-and-mitigation/fire-hazard-severity-zones).

Copy and paste the link or right-click to open in a new tab. Please provide an approximate number of acres or percentage of the project area in each zone.

Number of Acres in the Very High SRA FHSZ : 0
Number of Acres in the Very High LRA FHSZ : 0
Number of Acres in the High SRA FHSZ : 0
Number of Acres in the High LRA FHSZ : 0
Number of Acres in the Moderate SRA FHSZ : 0
FHSZ Total Acres : 0
Document Uploads
Letters of Support :

Letters of Commitment :

In addition to the online project mapping program treatment Geopoint and polygons, include a pdf map(s) of the project with the project application. The maps shall meet the requirements of Appendix G in the Procedural Guide.

PDF Project Map : 23-WP-BEU-59266418-Project Area Map.pdf The below required standard forms can be found in the forms section of the solicitation. To get to the Solicitation Link click back to the solicitation, then click on the three lines next to the application and click the solicitation link. The below documents are required at the time of submission.

STD 19 Nondiscrimination Compliance Statement form : 23-WP-BEU 59266418-STD19.pdf STD 21 A Drug-Free Workplace Certification form : 23-WP-BEU 59266418-STD21.pdf STD 204 Payee Data Record form : 23-WP-BEU 59266418-STD204.pdf Miscellaneous Form Upload Field #1 : 23-WP-BEU-59266418-SOW-Degree of Risk Maps.pdf Miscellaneous Form Upload Field #2 :

Miscellaneous Form Upload Field #3 :

Miscellaneous Form Upload Field #4 :
8/9/24, 3:20 PM about:blank
about:blank 4/5
52 Project Mapping Program
Project Mapping Program: Create a Geopoint and Polygon(s) via the weblink. copy and paste the link or right-click to open in a new tab:https://grant-access-calfire-forestry.hub.arcgis.com (https://grant-access-calfireforestry.hub.arcgis.com) The Online Project Mapping Component is a requirement for a complete application submission.

View Budget Worksheet : https://portal.ecivis.com/#/peerBudget/7EEF753C-2F71-444D-8205-56355875384D Average Score : 0.00
Application Goals :

View Application Goals : https://portal.ecivis.com/#/peerGoals/20C58937-45CB-44B3-B5D1-BD6EF4FBDC96 # of Reviews : 1
# of Denials : 0
Created by : [email protected]
Record ID # : 59266418
Last change : 2024-05-15T20:37:01+0000
8/9/24, 3:20 PM about:blank
about:blank 5/5
53 Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan
Linked Form Profile :

Linked Form Submissions : 23-WP-BEU- 59266418
Scope of Work :

Project Name : Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan
Project Tracking Number : 23-WP-BEU-59266418
Please use the Tracking Number that was automatically assigned by Grants Portal. The format will be 23-WP-UUUXXXXXXXX Project Description
Please provide a comprehensive project description including the location, habitable structures, acres treated, etc. (please note there are no space limitations) : Located in Monterey County, California, in the heart of the Salinas Valley, the City of Greenfield encompasses approximately 2.95 square miles (1,888 acres) with a population of 18,937(1). Greenfield's geographical position, characterized by natural landmarks such as the Reliz Canyon, the Salinas River, and nearby Pinnacles National Park rendering it particularly susceptible to wildfire risks.

This is evidenced by the region's wildfire history, including the devastating Soberanes Fire in 2016 and a more recent fire in early 2022 that required the response of 30 personnel from three agencies and air support when a 10- acre fire spread to the Salinas Riverbed. The Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan is an imperative initiative to fortify the City of Greenfield against the escalating threat of wildfires and the broader trend of increasing wildfire incidents in California (2). In coordination with a Registered Professional Forester (RPF), the Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan will develop a comprehensive Localized Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) and a Salinas Valley Fuel Modification Zone Plan designed to address the specific environmental and demographic characteristics of Greenfield. The RPF will be active in guiding the design and oversight of the development of the CWPP. The intent of the Localized CWPP is to mitigate the risk of wildfires, enhance local ecosystem health, protect critical infrastructure, and boost the safety of residents and first responders in the event of a wildfire. The project plan includes several critical tasks that will guide the City from Wildfire Prevention Planning to future implementation of Hazardous Fuels Reduction. These tasks are strategically developed to ensure the Healthy Forest Restoration Act (HFRA) minimum requirements for a CWPP are met. This includes reflecting collaboration between the community, local government, fire department, and state forestry agency; identification and prioritization of areas for hazardous fuel reduction treatments while recommending the most suitable methods of treatment; and recommending measures that homeowners and communities can take to reduce the ignitability of structures throughout the covered area. The following is an overview of the tasks that will be implemented to develop the Greenfield CWPP and Fuel Modification Plan for the Salinas Valley: TASK 1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT The project will begin with procuring a qualified consultant through the City’s competitive bidding process. The selected consultant will work closely with the RPF to design and develop the CWPP and the Fuel Modification Zone Plan. Additionally, the City will work with the consultant to form a Task Force committee that will be actively involved in community engagement and monitoring compliance for activities related to the CWPP to move the Plan into implementation. The City will provide project management and work collaboratively with the consultant and the RPF to ensure regulatory compliance and the timely delivery of the CWPP and the Fuel Modification Zone Plan. The contractor will also provide administrative support to the CWPP Task Force for program management activities such as preparing and facilitating Task Force and public workshops, including handout materials, maps, presentations, and other items necessary to meet the plan objectives. The consultant will provide quarterly status reports that detail work in 8/9/24, 3:21 PM about:blank
about:blank 1/13
54 progress, milestones, and fund expenditures and maintain project performance and schedule. TASK 2:

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT & OUTREACH PLAN This aspect involves a comprehensive public involvement strategy to ensure widespread awareness and input in the CWPP development. The City’s vision for community engagement is a very open and thorough process that allows no single interest to dominate. The community engagement and outreach plan will reach a diverse audience, soliciting input on the CWPP and Fuel Modification Plan, providing project announcements and flyers, as appropriate, providing opportunities to the public to identify issues and develop solutions, and providing opportunities for public comment. It ensures that all participants in the Planning Area have access to regular, timely information, meaningful and convenient methods of participation, and easy access to draft documents in advance of public workshops. The City will ensure that outreach for the CWPP is educational and clearly identifies the purpose of the CWPP effort. This will ensure meaningful feedback as the project moves forward. TASK 3: DATA COLLECTION & ANALYSIS AND MAPPING Vital to the project, this task involves gathering comprehensive data on land use, fire history, and risk areas, crucial for tailoring the CWPP to Greenfield's unique needs. The consultant will collect data and meet with Cal Fire during site visits to gain insight into the fire environment, necessary assessments, and potential associated fire risk issues. Additionally, the consultant will coordinate with the RPF, city, county, and other organizations, such as HOAs and Cal Fire, to collect all relevant GIS data needed to characterize the existing conditions within the CWPP Project Area and complete the fire environment and risk assessment. Data analysis will include a review of fire hazard/risk land use policies and City land use plans within the CWPP Project Area boundary. This will identify existing and proposed infrastructure or community facility improvements threatened by the surrounding Very High and High Fire Safety Zones. Maps will include existing and future land use, zoning, population and demographics, natural resources, and development activity. These maps will provide the background needed for everyone to have an equal understanding of existing conditions, trends, and the fire environment. They will be a major component of the risk analysis. TASK 4: FIRE ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT This will include an analysis of the current fire environment, historical incidents, and response capabilities to inform the CWPP's strategies. This task will also identify the evacuation resources and critical infrastructure to maximize wildfire protection in these areas. Mapping single access point communities along the Salinas River Valley, many of whom are agriculture communities, to facilitate education and awareness of pinch points in the community. Water availability and supply will inform educational and awareness campaigns focused on the availability of natural resources to suppress wildland fires in addition to possibly identifying other sources of water and fire suppression. TASK 5: FIRE HAZARD & RISK ASSESSMENT This task entails a detailed evaluation of community hazards, focusing on identifying at-risk areas and structures within Greenfield by analyzing recent past and projected future wildland fires. The city’s values related to fire risk will also be assessed. In this context, values are defined as the natural, socioeconomic, and cultural values the city has identified as valuable to the city to protect and preserve. Natural areas include the Salinas Riverbed and immediately surrounding vegetation that abuts the Pinnacles National Park and habitat areas - an area known to be extremely difficult to get to in the event of a fire due to its remote nature. Socioeconomic values include critical infrastructure—roadways, communications towers, and utility infrastructure. Cultural values are those historically relevant places or items that should be protected from wildland fire risk such as the Pinnacles National Park and the inaccessible remote area directly along the project area. TASK 6: MITIGATION STRATEGIES Formulating practical mitigation strategies, including fuel reduction plans and structural ignitability improvements, is a key outcome of the CWPP. Considering all relevant input and feedback provided by the participants, the consultant will develop the mitigation strategies concurrently with the development of the CWPP. Specific implementation strategies will be tailored for each CWPP Partner, keeping in mind each entity’s ability to implement the recommendations. The consultant will also provide an implementation cost estimate for the recommended strategies. Mitigation strategies will include hazardous fuel reduction plans and practices, public education and outreach, reduction in structural ignitability, improvement of fire response capabilities, recommendations for threat areas, post-fire response and rehabilitation, and suggested changes to existing plans, ordinances, and policies. Strategies with actionable steps for cooperative implementation monitoring for consideration will include continuing the Task Force, developing public outreach and public relations actions, or other specific project‐related tasks. TASK 8: FUEL MODIFICATION PLAN FOR SALINAS VALLEY Specific to the Salinas River Valley area, this task will outline strategies for vegetation management and building 8/9/24, 3:21 PM about:blank
about:blank 2/13
55 material considerations to reduce fire hazards. The consultant will develop the Fuel Modification Zone/Plan (FMP) for the Salinas River Valley concurrently with the CWPP and its mitigation strategies (Implementation Plan). The FMP will cover an area of approximately 540 acres along the Salinas River between Soledad and King City. The Consultant will use the data collected to develop tailored strategies for the city of Greenfield and pertinent stakeholders to implement actions to protect environmental assets, habitable structures, the city’s identified values, and the people from fire hazard risk for the Salinas River Valley. The Consultant will identify permitted vegetation and restricted building materials used in new or renovated structures. The FMP will also identify and recommend strategies for reducing greenhouse gases. The FMP will be designed to be immediately adopted by the city in its General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. TASK 9: CEQA ANALYSIS AND PREPARATION OF EIR To ensure that the project's strategies are environmentally sustainable and compliant with state regulations, the consultant will initiate the environmental compliance evaluation, including evaluation for timber harvesting. Depending on the determination, the consultant will then facilitate the next steps for compliance and include it in the final CWPP. TASK 10: MONITORING/EVALUATION/ IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY As part of the Mitigation Strategies and Fuel Modification Plan (Implementation Plan), ongoing assessment and refinement will continue to ensure the CWPP and mitigation strategies' effectiveness and adaptability over time. The consultant will ensure that dialogue continues among the City, participating CWPP Project Partners, local stakeholders, and the public, building upon the established understanding of communication and coordination procedures. The consultant will recommend a plan for the partners to follow, which will guarantee that the public is kept informed of the actions being taken by the CWPP partners to reduce the risks of fire hazards in the Greenfield Salinas River Valley area. (1) 2022 US Census.

American Community Survey. Data.census.gov/profile/Greenfield_city,_California?g=160xx00US0630994 (2) CAL FIRE, 2020 Wildfire Season Facts; CAL FIRE Incident Information for Soberanes Fire Section I :

Primary Activity Type : Wildfire Prevention Planning
Wildfire Prevention Planning

1. Describe the geographic scope of the project, including the communities that will benefit, and an estimate of the number of structures within the project area. : The geographic scope of the development of the CWPP will extend beyond the city limits of Greenfield and will encompass areas within the City’s sphere of influence and nearby regions. This expanded geographic scope focuses on the Salinas River bottom and surrounding vegetation, an area known for the hazard it poses to the highly inaccessible and remote areas located east of the river just south of the Pinnacles National Park in the Metz, Hadley Canyon, and Saucito Canyon. Specifically, the project covers approximately 540 acres of the Salinas River Valley, stretching between the cities of Soledad and King City. This inclusion is critical, as this area presents unique challenges and opportunities in wildfire management and prevention due to its remote nature. The City of Greenfield, located in Monterey County, California, is known for its agricultural significance and scenic beauty. It stretches across approximately 2.95 square miles or 1,888 acres along US Highway 101, between natural landmarks such as Reliz Canyon and the Salinas River, which are major stretch areas of Fire Hazard Severity Zones that further increase the City’s vulnerability to wildfires. Southwest of the City of Greenfield, Reliz Canyon is characterized by its natural terrain and vegetation. It is a natural treasure and a wildfire hazard with over 10,500 acres of Very High SRA FHSZ just 5 miles away. A mere 3 miles away on the City’s northeast side and just beyond the Salinas River are the equally hazardous Metz, Hadley Canyon, and Saucito Canyon, with over 5,000 acres of Very High SRA FHSZ - making implementing this plan crucial for the surrounding community's safety. The beneficiaries of this plan primarily include the agricultural and low-income residential communities within Greenfield. According to the 2022 US Census American Community Survey, the city has an estimated population of 18,973 and approximately 4,207 residential structures, with an average population density of approximately 9,083 residents per square mile. The City’s per capita income is $18,285, less than half the national average, and 93.8% of Greenfield’s residents identify as Hispanic or Latino. In addition to residential areas, the commercial and agricultural sectors of Greenfield are also integral to the local 8/9/24, 3:21 PM about:blank
about:blank 3/13
56 economy and are included in the plan's protective measures. Greenfield’s agricultural community results in a seasonal influx of migrant workers to meet labor demands during peak agriculture season, increasing the population to over 30,000. The largest land use in the City is residential, representing 47% of the acreage in the City, whereas 19% is designated as Public and Quasi-Public use. The City’s extensive agricultural area accounts for 15% of its land use. It is one of the most productive agricultural areas in the world - essential for sustaining its economic stability and providing employment to a substantial portion of its residents. Along the project scope area, there are an estimated 65 structures that are likely to be immediately affected. Other public structures, including schools, government buildings, and businesses, add to the tally of structures that would benefit from the wildfire prevention plan. The plan also considers protecting vital infrastructure elements like roads, utilities, and bridges in addition to the natural landscapes surrounding Greenfield, particularly those near the Salinas River, and extending to the Metz, Hadley Canyon, and Saucito Canyons. These areas are not only ecologically significant but also contribute to the region's overall environmental health and recreational value. Protecting these areas is vital for preserving biodiversity and maintaining ecological balance. The precise number of total structures and the extent of natural areas to be protected will be further clarified during the project's data collection and analysis phase, ensuring that the mitigation strategies are accurately tailored to the city's specific needs and characteristics.

2. Describe how the project will assess the risks to residents, structures and prioritize projects to reduce this risk over time. : The project will assess and mitigate risks by first collecting detailed information regarding land use, vegetation, climatic conditions, and historical wildfire occurrences in Greenfield and its surroundings, specifically along the Salinas River. Geographic Information System (GIS) technology will aid in creating detailed hazard maps that identify high-risk areas based on vegetation density, proximity to wildlands, and historical fire patterns. Using this data, an analysis of the likelihood and potential impact of wildfires in different areas, with a focus on population density, property values, and critical infrastructure, will be conducted. Vulnerable populations and high-value structures are prioritized where the impact of wildfires would be most significant. This assessment also informs the prioritization of areas for immediate intervention. Mitigation strategies will be developed, with fuel reduction initiatives in high-priority areas being a key focus. This includes planning for controlled burns, vegetation management, and removing potentially hazardous materials like dead trees. In parallel, the plan will emphasize the protection of infrastructure and structures, advocating for modifications that enhance fire resilience, such as creating defensible spaces and using fire-resistant materials. The development and dissemination of clear emergency access and evacuation plans, particularly for residents near high-risk zones, are also integral components of the project. Collaborating closely with the local community, fire department, and other stakeholders is one of the City’s coordinated and comprehensive approaches to wildfire risk reduction over time. The project’s community engagement and outreach phase involves community education and public awareness campaigns to educate residents about wildfire risks and safety practices while soliciting feedback to be included in the CWPP.

Continuous monitoring and evaluation will inform the adaptation of strategies based on new data, changing conditions, or feedback from the community. Periodic updates to the CWPP are planned to reflect new developments and insights gained from past wildfire events, thus ensuring long-term risk reduction. This includes integrating wildfire risk management considerations into broader city planning and zoning regulations.

3. Does the proposed plan add or build upon previous wildfire prevention planning efforts in the general project area? : The CWPP is a significant enhancement to existing wildfire prevention efforts both within the City of Greenfield and the surrounding areas of Monterey County. The plan will build upon existing knowledge and practices, introducing more advanced and comprehensive measures focusing on risk mitigation to protect the City from its surrounding terrain of Very High SRA FHSZs for a targeted approach to addressing the specific wildfire risks these areas present. Specifically, the CWPP will expand on planning efforts and assessments in the 2022 Monterey County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP)(3). In addition, the MJHMP specifically outlines a Multi-Hazard/Wildfire Evacuation Plan as a collaborative effort involving various departments for a coordinated and efficient response in emergencies. It includes evacuation routes, communication protocols, and coordination mechanisms among different agencies. It involves the City Manager Planning Department and the Police Department for a cross-functional evacuation strategy, ensuring that it is comprehensive and well-integrated 8/9/24, 3:21 PM about:blank
about:blank 4/13
57 into the broader hazard mitigation framework of the county. This is particularly important considering the changing fire threat landscape in the region. The MJHMP, CAL FIRE's Fire Threat data, combines expected fire frequency with potential fire behavior to create threat classes (extreme, very high, high, and moderate), and is used to assess the wildfire risks in Greenfield. According to the MJHMP, the City of Greenfield proper, as of the latest analysis, has no population or property in a Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ). However, the CWPP will target the specific wildfire risks presented by areas in and within the vicinity of the Salinas River, that extend into natural areas characterized by higher fire threat levels. In just the past year, the FHSZ classifications of these geographic areas surrounding the Salinas Valley River specifically the areas of the Metz, Hadley Canyon, and Saucito Canyons, have worsened from mostly Moderate and High SRA FHSZ to a majority of the area being classified as Very High and High SRA FHSZ. The nature of the rugged terrain adds an extra layer of threat as much of this area is very difficult to reach and would be immediately threatened by wildfires occurring to the west along the Salinas River vegetation area. This effort will also be an essential tool in protecting the Salinas River and Groundwater Basin as it is a critical infrastructure asset for the region. The proposed project not only adds to the existing wildfire prevention efforts but also significantly builds upon them by incorporating a more nuanced understanding of the region's changing geographical and ecological diversity. It addresses the distinct challenges and needs of Greenfield and its surrounding areas, making a nonnegotiable contribution to the overall safety and resilience of the community against the impending threat of wildfires. (3) MJHMP. 2022. Monterey County. https://monterey.org/Emergency%20Resources/2022-Monterey-County-MJHMP-Volume-2.pdf

4. Identify a diverse group of key stakeholders, including local, state, and federal officials where appropriate, to collaborate with during the planning process. Discuss how the project proponent plans to engage with these targeted stakeholders. : During the CWPP and Salinas River FMP planning process, various stakeholders from local, state, and federal levels will be engaged. Those identified for collaboration include representatives from Cal Fire, the California Coastal Conservancy, Monterey County, and its various departments such as the Water Resources Agency, Fire, Public Works, Facilities, and Parks. Involvement from the City of Greenfield includes representatives from the fire department, community development planning/zoning, public works, water resources, and parks and recreation. Additionally, representatives from relevant Homeowners' Associations (HOAs) and Tunzi Villages Planned Development, or comparable city staff, will also be engaged to ensure community interests and local development perspectives are considered. These targeted stakeholders will be engaged throughout the plan's development via multiple avenues of communication and collaboration. This includes stakeholder interviews, four Task Force meetings, three public workshop meetings, and other communication platforms such as email, print announcements, phone calls, and a dedicated webpage on the city's website. A key aspect of this engagement process is soliciting feedback on identified issues and the proposed mitigation strategies. The consultant, working in tandem with the city, will actively seek input to ensure the CWPP and FMP are comprehensive, supported by the community, and serve as dynamic blueprints for future fire prevention and protection. Special emphasis will be placed on protecting the city’s and area’s natural and water resources, recognizing their significance in the broader ecosystem and the integral role they play in fire management strategies.

5. Describe the pathways for community involvement that will be incorporated in the planning process. :

The Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan prioritizes community involvement in all stages of the planning process. To facilitate this, the City’s procured consultant will work with the CWPP Task Force committee to coordinate public engagement, including at least three public workshops. The first workshop will take place during the initial stage of the project, where the goal is to identify issues and capabilities. This meeting will solicit the community’s feedback on their initial concerns and will facilitate their understanding of the scope and potential impact of the project. The second workshop will occur during the middle phase of the project and will focus on fire risk areas. At this stage, community feedback can significantly influence the identification and prioritization of risk areas. The third workshop will take place towards the end of the planning process to discuss and refine the proposed mitigation strategies.

This stage is crucial for gaining community buy-in and support for implementing the strategies. The consultant will also disseminate information through print media, which will be available for download from the city's website. 8/9/24, 3:21 PM about:blank
about:blank 5/13
58 Regular updates will be provided to inform the community of the plan's progress and next steps. Throughout the project’s planning process, direct communication will be encouraged between community members and their elected and city officials to allow residents to obtain the latest information, ask questions, and provide meaningful input.

Section II :

Degree of Risk

1. Discuss the location of the project in relation to areas of moderate, high, or very high fire hazard severity zone as identified by the latest Fire and Resource Assessment Program maps. : While Greenfield proper lies within the non-Very High Fire Hazard Safety Zone (VHFHSZ) of the Local Responsibility Area (LRA), the Salinas River directly abuts the State/Federal Responsibility Area (SRA) to the east, specifically in the Metz, Hadley Canyon, and Saucito Canyon area, which are major stretch zones classified as Very High and High Fire Hazard Severity Zones, according to the latest Fire and Resource Assessment Program maps. This area is particularly concerning due to the location of these canyons to the east of the target mitigation area and the inaccessible nature that would prove difficult to contain a wildfire in the area indicating the highest risk due to the predominantly southwestward wind direction. Simultaneously, the 11-mile stretch south of Greenfield, leading to King City, also predominantly features high to moderate fire severity zones. Further amplifying the risk, the northeastern side of Greenfield, beyond the Salinas River, includes the areas from Soledad to Greenfield along the Salinas River that cover well over 5,000 acres and also fall mostly under the Very High SRA FHSZ category. This proximity to high-risk zones necessitates consideration within the city’s CWPP Project Area, as there are habitable structures within 0.25 miles of the State’s Responsibility Area (SRA) directly across the Salinas River to the west. Over the past year, the Salinas Valley has experienced a concerning transition in its FHSZ classifications. This shift has been observed in the SRA, where previously, these areas were predominantly classified as Moderate and High Fire Hazard Severity, and recent assessments have indicated a significant change, with a majority of these areas now being classified as Very High and High FHSZ. This alarming transition reflects an escalation in wildfire risks within the region. Attached are Fire and Resource Assessment Program maps for 2022 and 2023 that illustrate this shift.

2. Describe the geographic proximity of the project to structures at risk to damage from wildfire in the WUI. : The eastern boundary of the City is less than a mile away from the WUI, with habitable structures located within

0.25 miles of the WUI on the east side of the Salinas River and along the east part of the City. The western part of the city is less than four miles from the Reliz Canyon WUI, which is characterized as high and very high fire severity zones. According to the 2022 US Census American Community Survey, the City has an estimated 4,207 residential structures with approximately 65 of those structures likely facing imminent threats from wildfires due to their proximity to the Salinas River. The most recent CalFire Hazard Severity Zone Map shows the valley surrounded by very high fire hazard risk fuels. According to the 2022 Monterey County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP), a Fire Threat analysis was conducted using Cal FIRE Fire Threat data revealing that 149 residential and 113 non-residential properties within the Greenfield City limits were at Moderate Fire Threat with an estimated combined property value of $92,960,3983(3). These distances present an urgent need for the City to develop this CWPP and FMP project and collaborate more extensively with State and County agencies for fire hazard risk assessments and fire hazard reduction in addition to planning and implementing strategies to reduce fire fuels in this area. (3)MJHMP. 2022. Monterey County. https://monterey.org/Emergency%20Resources/2022-MontereyCounty-MJHMP-Volume-2.pdf Section III :

Community Support
8/9/24, 3:21 PM about:blank
about:blank 6/13
59 1. Does the project include any matching funds from other funding sources or any in-kind contributions that are expected to extend the impact of the proposed project? : The City of Greenfield has not identified or appropriated matching funds for this project. The City of Greenfield’s FY 22-23 budget had projected total revenues of $11,482,386 and had an expenditure total of $10,905,237, leaving little in the way of resources to support critical projects. Additionally, no other financial commitments or support have been secured from partners or interested stakeholders for the Wildfire Prevention Project.

2. Describe plans for external communications during the life of the project to keep the effected community informed about the goals, objectives and progress of the project. Activities such as planned press releases, project signage, community meetings, and field tours are encouraged. : To keep the community informed and engaged with the project's goals, objectives, and progress, the City will oversee a comprehensive external communication strategy implemented by the consultant. This will include establishing a dedicated section on the City's official website that will serve as a central hub for disseminating detailed information about the project, including updates on its progress, timelines, and any relevant resources for the community. It will also offer a space for residents to provide feedback and ask questions. To further this communication effort, the City plans to release updates regularly disseminated via email and posted on the project website, ensuring that the community stays informed about the project’s status, upcoming events, and key achievements. All communication efforts will be designed with inclusivity in mind with bilingual information. Additionally, the City will host a series of public workshops to provide information and a forum for direct engagement, allowing community members, particularly in high-risk areas, to participate actively in the planning process and express their views and concerns. The City’s social media channels will also be leveraged to post regular updates and share alerts related to the project.

3. Describe any plans to maintain the project after the grant period has ended. : The City of Greenfield is strategically preparing for a swift and effective transition to the implementation phase of its wildfire mitigation strategies after the planning grant period. This preparedness is underpinned by two critical aspects integrated into the current planning process: the initiation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process and a thorough assessment of the costs and potential funding sources for the mitigation strategies. Initiating the CEQA environmental process within the Wildfire Prevention Planning grant performance period will position Greenfield for a smooth and rapid shift to the practical application of the Fuel Modification Plan and other key mitigation strategies.

This effectively removes potential roadblocks related to environmental requirements, ensuring that once the grant period concludes, there will be minimal delay in implementing the critical measures necessary to safeguard the community against wildfires. Furthermore, during the planning phase, costs associated with implementing the recommended mitigation strategies will be estimated. This "ballpark figure" will enable informed decision-making and strategic financial planning. It also allows all involved parties to prepare their future budgets accordingly and seek appropriate funding sources. One such funding source under consideration for project implementation is the USDA Community Wildfire Defense Grant, which provides funding to at-risk communities that are low-income with high or very high wildfire hazard potential to implement projects described within a Community Wildfire Protection Plan.

4. Does the proposed project work with other organizations or agencies to address fire hazard reduction at the landscape level? : The Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan project is designed to collaborate extensively with various organizations and agencies to address fire hazard reduction at the landscape level effectively. This collaborative approach is a fundamental aspect of the project. It is part of the City of Greenfield’s wider commitment to hazard mitigation aligned with its role as outlined in the Monterey County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP). The City has played an active and collaborative role in supporting the broader planning process of the MJHMP with its internal planning team, which consists of the Fire Chief, Administrative Fire Captain, Planning Director, and Public Works Division Manager. The MJHMP includes a jurisdiction-specific risk assessment for Greenfield that includes the identification of wildfire hazard threats. The City’s involvement in the MJHMP allows for the leveraging of multijurisdictional collaboration to address fire hazard reduction. Engaging relevant local authorities and experts in the CWPP and FMP design process will combine diverse expertise and resources to 8/9/24, 3:21 PM about:blank
about:blank 7/13
60 create a comprehensive and impactful wildfire mitigation strategy. The plan anticipates working with various organizations spanning local, state, and federal levels, including entities such as Cal Fire, the California Coastal Conservancy, Monterey County departments, the City of Greenfield departments, and local community groups like homeowners' associations. The involvement of these organizations is imperative for ensuring that the plan addresses the fire hazard reduction needs across the different landscapes within and surrounding Greenfield. The City also recognizes the dynamic nature of such a comprehensive planning process. As such, it is open to the possibility of involving additional organizations as recommended by the consultant working on the project. This flexibility ensures the plan remains adaptable and inclusive, capturing a broad range of insights and capabilities.

Section IV :

Project Implementation

1. Discuss the anticipated timeline for the project. Make sure to take seasonal restrictions into account. :

The City anticipates a 12-month timeline for the Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan, factoring in all necessary steps from the project's initiation following the grant award to the final completion. This timeline accounts for various project stages, including consultant procurement, data collection, community engagement, and developing the Community Wildfire Prevention Plan, including the Salinas Valley FMP, CEQA assessment, and Environmental Impact Review documents. Months 1-2: Upon receipt of the grant intent to award notification, the City will initiate the procurement process for professional services. The City aims to have a qualified consultant secured coinciding with or shortly after executing the grant agreement. Once the City Council approves the contract with the consultant, the City's CWPP Project Manager will collaborate with the consultant to review the scope of work, establish meeting schedules, and assist in forming the Task Force committee. The kick-off meeting with the Task Force Committee is scheduled within the first month of the contract execution, marking the commencement of data collection, analysis, and mapping tasks. Months 3-4: The second and third months will see continued data collection, analysis, and mapping, alongside preparations for the Task Force meeting and the first public workshop, both of which are slated for the fourth month. This period also marks the start of understanding and preparing reports on the fire environment in Greenfield. Months 5-9: From the fifth month onwards, the focus will shift to developing the Fire Hazard and Risk Assessment. This phase is designed to incorporate feedback from all stakeholders, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the fire risks. Concurrently, the development of mitigation strategies will begin based on the accumulated data and stakeholder feedback. Months 8-12: The eighth month will see the initiation of the Salinas Valley Fuel Modification Plan, which will be finalized alongside other project documents at the project's end. Concurrently, the environmental consultant will begin the CEQA assessment and preparation of the EIR documents, a process estimated to take about five months. This will be crucial for the recommended treatment options in the Fuel Modification Plan. Month 12: The final month will mark the project's culmination, completing the Community Wildfire Prevention Plan, including the mitigation strategies, the Salinas Valley Fuel Modification Plan, and the CEQA and EIR documents. While the City does not anticipate any significant seasonal restrictions impacting the progress of the CWPP, FMP for the Salinas Valley, and the CEQA assessment and EIR, it is cognizant of the need to consider and include any potential seasonal limitations in the environmental assessment and CWPP. This consideration is vital to ensure that the outcomes and recommended strategies are realistic and applicable throughout the year.

2. Verify the expected timeframes to complete the project will fall under the required completion dates depending on the source of the funds awarded. : The Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan's expected 12-month timeline aligns with the completion dates required, as detailed in the Wildfire Prevention Grants Procedural Guide for FY 2023-24. A key aspect of this alignment is the project's inclusion of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance process within the first 12 months post-grant execution, beginning in Month 8 and concluding by Month 12. This scheduling falls within the grant requirement that mandates CEQA or NEPA compliance to be achieved within 12 months of the grant agreement's execution. Furthermore, the entire project, encompassing the Community Wildfire Prevention Plan, the Salinas Valley Fuel Modification Plan, and the CEQA and EIR documents, 8/9/24, 3:21 PM about:blank
about:blank 8/13
61 is scheduled to be completed within the 12-month period. This timeline ensures all project-related work is finished by the final expiration date specified in the grant agreement. Additionally, the City of Greenfield's proposal accounts for the possibility of extending the project timeline if needed. In line with the funding guidelines, any requests for timeline extension must be submitted to CAL FIRE 60 days before the grant agreement's end date. This provision for potential amendments to the grant agreement will be beneficial should the City need to address unforeseen challenges while maintaining compliance with the funding source's stipulations. The 12-month project timeline demonstrates the City's intent to meet the timeframe requirements, ensuring the project's successful and timely completion.

3. Please list the milestones that will be used to measure the progress of the project. : The project is structured around a series of milestones that are strategically distributed throughout the project's 12-month timeline - providing clear progress indicators. The following are the major milestones for the project: 1. Community Engagement and Outreach Plan: This plan is a foundational component of the project, designed to be used throughout the project planning and implementation phases to ensure effective communication and involvement of the community in the project. 2. First Public Workshop Meeting: This is the first opportunity to inform the public about the project and gather initial feedback. 3. Development of the Fire Environment Report Sections: This involves compiling detailed information about the fire environment in the proposed project area- essential for a comprehensive assessment of the fire risks and characteristics of these regions. 4. Second Public Workshop Meeting: Findings and developments about the project will be presented, and additional community input will be gathered. 5. Identification of Fire Hazard and Risk Areas: This will pinpoint areas that require specific attention in the mitigation plans by identifying fire hazard and risk areas in Greenfield, along the Salinas River. 6. Development of Draft Mitigation Strategies: Initial mitigation strategies to address identified fire risks are developed based on earlier assessments and community feedback. 7. Development of FMP and CEQA/EIR Documents: These documents are critical for ensuring the environmental compliance and effectiveness of the proposed strategies. 8.

Third and Final Public Workshop Meeting: As the final formal community engagement event, this workshop will present the refined strategies and plans, incorporating feedback from previous stages and finalizing community input. 9. Finalization of CWPP for Greenfield and Salinas River Valley FMP and CEQA/EIR Documents: This final milestone culminates the project with the completion of the CWPP for Greenfield, which also includes the Salinas River Valley FMP and all necessary CEQA/EIR documentation.

4. Please list the measurable outcomes (i.e. project deliverables) that will be used to measure the project’s success. : The project’s deliverables that will be used to measure the project’s success include: 1. Completion of the Community Engagement and Outreach Plan: ○ A document outlining strategies for ongoing community involvement and feedback mechanisms throughout the project. ○ Establish a Task Force committee composed of stakeholders, community members, fire experts, emergency management experts, etc., to oversee public outreach and education. This committee will coordinate with project managers to continue to address public feedback. 2.

Execution of Public Workshop Meetings: ○ Successfully conduct at least three public workshops, with documented attendance and participation levels. ○ Utilize workshops to maintain and boost public morale and support for fuel reduction treatments and projects 3. Finalization of the Fire Environment Report Sections: ○ A comprehensive report detailing the fire environment in the proposed project area, including terrain, vegetation, and historical fire data. 4. Identification and Documentation of Fire Hazard and Risk Areas: ○ Detailed mapping and descriptions of specific fire hazard and risk areas within Greenfield and surrounding regions. ○ Provide surrounding agencies, including mutual/automatic aid support, with maps and findings. 5. Development and Approval of Draft Mitigation Strategies: ○ Draft document containing recommended mitigation strategies based on risk assessments and community input. ○ Draft documents based on published best practices suggestions for terrain, acres to be treated, fuel loads/type, and density. 6. Completion of the Salinas Valley Fuel Modification Plan and CEQA/EIR Documents:
○ Finalized FMP document and associated CEQA/EIR documents, ensuring compliance with environmental regulations and effectiveness of fuel modification strategies. 7. Comprehensive Community Wildfire Protection Plan for Greenfield and Salinas River Valley FMP: ○ A complete CWPP integrated with the Salinas River Valley FMP, reflecting all data, analyses, community inputs, emergency management, and planned mitigation strategies. 8/9/24, 3:21 PM about:blank
about:blank 9/13
62 5. If applicable, how will the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) be met? : The CEQA process has been integrated into the early planning stages of the Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan project.

The initiation of the CEQA process during the project planning phase will ensure that potential environmental impacts and appropriate mitigation strategies are identified and evaluated in a timely and comprehensive manner.

This early inclusion of the CEQA process means that once the planning phase concludes and the project moves into the implementation stage, all necessary environmental compliance issues will have already been addressed, allowing for a more efficient rollout of the mitigation strategies. Furthermore, the City is committed to ensuring public involvement and transparency throughout the CEQA process. This commitment includes public notifications, opportunities for public comment, and addressing public concerns regarding environmental impacts, thereby adhering to CEQA’s stipulations for community engagement and information disclosure.

6. List any existing forest or land management plans; Conservation Easements; Covenant, Conditions & Restrictions (CC&R’s); matters related to zoning; use restrictions, or other factors that can or will limit the wildfire prevention proposed activity? : The Greenfield CWPP Project Area is subject to various environmental regulations and land management plans that may influence the scope and execution of the proposed wildfire prevention activities. Key among these are the Federal Endangered Species Act and the California Endangered Species Act, which enforce protective measures for habitats and wildlife resources, particularly along the Salinas River Valley. These acts necessitate careful planning and execution of activities to avoid negatively impacting endangered species or their habitats. Additionally, regulations from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Game are also a factor, especially given the presence of special status species— flora and fauna—in the CWPP Project Area. Furthermore, several strategic plans by the Monterey County Water Resources Agency are also considered, such as the Long-Term Management Plan for the Salinas River and the Salinas River Stream Maintenance Program. The Salinas River has been classified as the dominant riparian corridor along California’s Central Coast(4). The headwaters are located in the La Panza Range to the south. The river flows northwest for 152 miles, mainly through the Salinas Valley, before ending in Monterey Bay near Marina.

It’s considered the dominant riparian because the watershed drains approximately 4,600 square miles of Land in Monterey and San Luis Obispo Counties. Furthermore, it includes 200,000 acres of irrigated agriculture responsible for producing most of the United States' lettuce, broccoli, artichokes, strawberries, and cauliflower. Agriculture is the backbone of the local economy. According to the United States Geological Survey, wildfires pose substantial risks as they can lead to flooding, erosion, and delivery of sediment, nutrients, and metals to rivers, lakes, and reservoirs(5). Conclusively, identifying and evaluating strategies for protecting the section of the Salinas River identified in the CWPP would be a high priority. These plans are intended to protect and preserve the Salinas River, potentially imposing specific guidelines or restrictions on land and water use that could impact wildfire prevention measures. Also of significance are the Salinas Valley Watershed Management Plan and the Salinas Valley Integrated Groundwater Sustainability Plan, which focus on the sustainable management of water resources in the Salinas Valley and may impact activities that involve watershed and groundwater resources. In light of these regulatory and planning frameworks, the City of Greenfield’s development and implementation of a CWPP will be carefully coordinated. This necessitates consulting the relevant plans and ensuring compliance with all applicable environmental regulations and guidelines to maintain the ecological balance and protect the water resources of the Salinas River Valley. (4) Salinas River Watershed. Resource Conservation District of Monterey County. www.rcdmonterey.org. (5) Water Quality After Wildfire. USGS.

Section V :

Administration

1. Describe any previous experience the project proponent has with similar projects. Include a list of recent past projects the proponent has successfully completed if applicable. Project applicant or manager having no previous experience with similar projects should discuss any past experiences that may help show a capacity to successfully complete the project being proposed. This may include partnering with a more 8/9/24, 3:21 PM about:blank
about:blank 10/13
63 experienced organization that can provide project support. : The City of Greenfield and the Greenfield Fire Department bring valuable experience from their involvement in previous wildfire and hazard mitigation planning projects. Their experience is highlighted by their participation in developing the Monterey County Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP). This involvement first realized with the plan’s adoption in November 2010 and its subsequent update in March 2016, has equipped the City and the Fire Department with valuable insights and skills in crafting community-level wildfire protection strategies. Additionally, the City and Department have collaborated with the County in formulating the 2022 Monterey County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. To supplement their capabilities and ensure the effectiveness of the current project, the City plans to leverage the County’s technical expertise and resources, particularly in areas where the City might require additional support or specialized knowledge. The City of Greenfield is well-positioned to manage and implement the proposed project by combining direct experience in wildfire protection planning with their County of Monterey partners.

2. Identify who will be responsible for tracking project expenses and maintaining project records in a manner that allows for a full audit trail of any awarded grant funds. : The City of Greenfield’s Fire Chief, Jim Langborg, would be the internal project manager, working collaboratively with the City of Greenfield’s Finance Department to facilitate the accurate accounting of expenditures and maintaining project records for this grant. The goal is to develop and use a smooth internal communication system combined with the City’s existing financial software to track and monitor necessary department and program expenditures for audits and reporting. This is a common practice within the City’s departments to ensure a smooth accounting, auditing, and reporting system.

Section VI :

Budget
A detailed project budget should be provided in the online budget included in this solicitation. The space provided here is to allow for a narrative description to further explain the proposed budget.

1. Explain how the grant funds, if awarded, will be spent to support the goals and objectives of the project.

If equipment grant funds are requested, explain how the equipment will be utilized and maintained beyond the life of the grant. : If the City of Greenfield is selected for an award, the funds will be allocated to support the development of the CWPP, the FMP for the Salinas River Valley, and to conduct the necessary CEQA analysis, including preparing the EIR. A significant portion of the grant will be dedicated to procuring a qualified professional consultant, selected through a Request for Proposals (RFP) process, ensuring that the City partners with an entity with the requisite expertise and experience. The consultant will be crucial in developing the CWPP and the FMP.

Their expertise will ensure that these plans are comprehensive and effectively tailored to the unique environmental and community characteristics of the Salinas River Valley and Greenfield. Additionally, the consultant will coordinate the CEQA analysis, which is vital to ensure that all potential environmental impacts of the proposed wildfire mitigation strategies are thoroughly assessed and mitigated. Preparing necessary environmental documents, such as the EIR, for compliance with state environmental regulations will be a key deliverable of the consultant’s work.

The project’s goals are centralized on reducing fuel loads and minimizing the ignitability of landscapes within the City's Local Responsibility Area (LRA), thereby enhancing the overall wildfire resilience of the community. Beyond the life of the grant, the City is committed to ensuring the sustainability and maintenance of the wildfire prevention strategies. This entails integrating the CWPP and the FMP into the City’s long-term environmental and community safety frameworks, facilitating continuous application and periodic updating of the strategies.

2. Are the costs for each proposed activity reasonable for the geographic area where they are to be performed? Identify any costs that are higher than usual and explain any special circumstances within the project that makes these increased costs necessary to achieve the goals and objectives of the project. :

The costs associated with the proposed activities of the Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan project are reasonable, considering the unique requirements and extensive geographic area covered by the project. While Greenfield proper is a relatively small community in the Salinas River Valley, the project covers a broader area, including the 8/9/24, 3:21 PM about:blank
about:blank 11/13
64 Salinas River Valley from an approximately 1-mile stretch in both directions from Greenfield to the City of Soledad and King City. This expanded scope involves a substantial workload, including in-depth data collection, analysis, and diverse strategy implementations across different landscapes, which justifies the costs. Furthermore, the consultant is tasked with developing not just one but multiple comprehensive plans - the CWPP, the FMP, and the CEQA environmental documents. This increases the complexity and depth of the work required, making the costs appropriate for the scale and nature of the project. The immediate implementation of fuel reduction mitigation strategies post-planning also adds to the project's intricacy, necessitating thorough and detailed preparation to ensure the readiness and effectiveness of the strategies. Additionally, the environmental component, particularly the preparation of CEQA documents, involves extensive environmental impact assessments given the sensitive nature of the Salinas River Valley area. The proposed costs for the Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan project are reasonable based on the extensive area covered, the complexity of developing multiple comprehensive plans, the urgency of strategy implementation, and the necessary environmental considerations. Indirect costs of the project constitute less than 12 percent of the total project costs, indicating that most of the funding is directly allocated to substantive aspects of the project.

3. Is the total project cost appropriate for the size, scope, and anticipated benefit of the project? : In assessing the total project cost for the Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan project, the City of Greenfield has undertaken a diligent review process to ensure that the budget is appropriate for the size, scope, and anticipated benefits of the project. This process included analyzing the scopes and budgets of similar projects. The comparison of the proposed project with similar projects has provided the City with valuable benchmarks and insights, ensuring that the proposed budget aligns with the norm for projects of similar scale and complexity. The size of the project is substantial, with the project's scope extending beyond Greenfield proper, covering a significant geographical area that includes varied landscapes and environmental sensitivities. The anticipated benefits of the project are invaluable, which include enhanced wildfire resilience, protection of natural habitats, and long-term community safety. Given the project’s extensive coverage, the complexity of planning and implementation, and the significant potential benefits of community safety and environmental protection, the total project cost proposed by the City of Greenfield is appropriate.

4. Please list each object category amount that you are requesting and the detail of how that would support meeting the grant objectives. : The City of Greenfield's budget request for the Wildfire Prevention Plan is detailed across various object categories, each supporting specific aspects of the grant objectives. The breakdown is as follows: Salaries and Wages: $61,300.00 & Benefits: $13,007.00 ● Project Management ($19,100.00): ○ Supports administrative aspects of the project, including monitoring, tracking, schedule adherence, and budget management.

Contractual: $102,575.00 ● Kick-off Meeting and Public Workshop Meetings ($10,024.00): ○ Funds the initial meeting to introduce the city, partners, consultants, and stakeholders to the planning process, project goals, and expected outcomes. ○ Facilitates discussion on community engagement and outreach opportunities. ○ Supports the preparation and successful delivery of at least three public workshops. ● Community Engagement & Outreach Plan ($17,548.80): ○ Addresses collaboration goals through a structured approach to community engagement and outreach. ○ Expected to enhance external communications beyond the grant period into the implementation phase. ● Data Collection & Analysis / Mapping ($18,250.00): ○ Supports gathering and analyzing information to inform stakeholders in decision-making about wildfire mitigation strategies. ○ Aids in developing plans to prevent wildfire spread, reduce fuel loads, and minimize structural ignitability. ● Fire Environment ($19,169.80): ○ Assesses fire environment factors, including weather patterns and factors, water resources, supply, and fire response capabilities. ○ Enhances understanding of resources available for fire prevention and suppression. ● Fire Hazard & Risk Assessment ($17,093.20): ○ Identifies fire hazards and provides a comprehensive risk assessment (including assessment of structures at heightened risk) in the project area. ○ Identifies environmental factors that increase risk, such as wind direction, rate of spread calculations, ○ Critical for developing mitigation strategies for project implementation. ● Mitigation Strategies ($20,560.20): ○ Funds the development of action steps for fire prevention, focusing on reducing fuel hazards and minimizing structural ignitability in the project area. ○ Identifies acres to be treated ● Fuel Modification Plan for Salinas Valley ($14,031.80): ○ Identifies fuel models and tables ○ Directly 8/9/24, 3:21 PM about:blank
about:blank 12/13
65 addresses fuel hazards, structure ignitability reductions, and potentially greenhouse gas reduction based on recommended strategies. ● CEQA Analysis and Preparation of EIR ($30,000): ○ Ensures compliance with environmental regulations and effectiveness of fuel modification strategies ○ Prepares the project for a swift transition from planning to implementing the fuel modification plan, enabling a quicker start to the implementation phase. ● Monitoring / Evaluation / Implementation Strategy ($11,104.20): ○ Provides for the final CWPP, FMP, and CEQA/EIR documents, facilitating the City’s preparedness for a smooth and quick transition to the implementation phase. Indirect Costs: $12,381.74 necessary for the general operation of the organization for this project.

5. Does your project include the purchase of capital equipment (more than $5,000 per item)? : No Section VII :

California Climate Investments
The space provided here is to allow for a narrative description to further explain how the project/activity will reduce Greenhouse Gas emissions.

1. How will the project/activity reduce Greenhouse Gas emissions? : The Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan project, which includes the deliverables of the completed Community Wildfire Protection Plan and the Salinas Valley Fuel Modification Plan, will reduce Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions through its wildfire mitigation strategies.

According to a 2020 California Air Resources Board (CARB) report, annual CO2 emissions from wildfires in California averaged approximately 14 million metric tons (MMT) during 2000–2019(6). One of the primary mitigation methods that will be explored during this project is the reduction of fuel loads in high-risk areas. By decreasing the amount of combustible vegetation and dead wood, the intensity and spread of wildfires can be significantly reduced, consequently lowering the emissions of GHGs. Additionally, the implementation of the CWPP and FMP focuses on promoting the health and sustainability of forests and vegetation. The CARB report notes that an average of 4.6 MMT of carbon is transformed annually through forest management activities in California(3). By managing high-fire hazard areas to reduce fuel loads while maintaining their health, the project will minimize the carbon released due to decomposition or combustion while enhancing the natural area’s capacity for long-term carbon sequestration.

The project also includes community involvement early in the planning process, promoting broader awareness and adoption of land management practices that contribute to GHG reduction. Lastly, by integrating wildfire prevention strategies into broader land use and environmental planning, the project promotes sustainable development and conservation practices that lower GHG emissions. (6) CARB. 2020. A Report on Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Contemporary Wildfire, Prescribed Fire, and Forest Management Activities Created by : [email protected]
Record ID # : 59268413
Last change : 2024-05-15T20:35:58+0000
8/9/24, 3:21 PM about:blank
about:blank 13/13
Updated 2-26-25
Reliz Canyon Fuel Reduction Area
The proposed area for fuels reduction in the Reliz Canyon Road area are as follows.

Proposed reduction will be made in The Local Responsible Areas (LRA). Proposed area: From Arroyo Seco Road South along Reliz Canyon Road to the Los Padres National Forrest Border. Reliz Canyon Road serves as the eastern boarder line. Area West of Reliz Canyon Road two hundred to three hundred feet in from Reliz Canyon Road shall be the proposed area for fuels reduction.
66 Passthrough Agency: Report Date: 08/09/2024
Program: Requested By: Jim Langborg
Project Name/Title: [email protected]
Org Name: City of Greenfield
Stage: Pre-Award
Budget Items
Category Title Description Units Unit Cost Extended Cost Direct Cost Indirect Cost GL Account Cost Share Project Manager Hours 215 $110.00 $23,650.00 $23,650.00 $1,655.50 $0.00 Deputy Project Manager Hours 335 $90.00 $30,150.00 $30,150.00 $2,110.50 $0.00 Support Staff Hours 125 $60.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $525.00 $0.00 675 $260.00 $61,300.00 $61,300.00 $4,291.00 $0.00
Project Manager Hours 215 $23.42 $5,037.35 $5,037.35 $352.61 $0.00 Deputy Project Manager Hours 335 $19.12 $6,406.13 $6,406.13 $448.43 $0.00 Support Staff Hours 125 $12.51 $1,563.52 $1,563.52 $109.45 $0.00 675 $55.05 $13,007.00 $13,007.00 $910.49 $0.00
Technical Advisor Contract 1 $8,575.00 $8,575.00 $8,575.00 $600.25 $0.00 Environmental Consult Contract 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $2,100.00 $0.00 GIS Support Contract 1 $24,000.00 $24,000.00 $24,000.00 $1,680.00 $0.00 CWPP Consultant Contract 1 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $2,800.00 $0.00 4 $102,575.00 $102,575.00 $102,575.00 $7,180.25 $0.00
Use Titles to briefly describe
each item. Cost Share from
the grantee and from a partner
can be tracked on separate
lines. Note that your indirect
cost rate setting (which must
be between 0 and 12%) will
automatically apply to each
line
In each rows
Description, enter the
unit of measurement
and choose from only
the following labels:

Hours, Days, Each,
Report, Contract, Miles,
Daily, Acres
0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Use Titles to briefly describe
each item. Cost Share from
the grantee and from a partner
can be tracked on separate
lines. Note that your indirect
cost rate setting (which must
be between 0 and 12%) will
automatically apply to each
line
In each rows
Description, enter the
unit of measurement
and choose from only
the following labels:

Hours, Days, Each,
Report, Contract, Miles,
Daily, Acres
0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
NOTE: Indirect cost rates do
not apply to Equipment. Use
Titles to briefly describe each
item. Cost Share from the
grantee and from a partner can
be tracked on separate lines.

In each rows
Description, enter the
unit of measurement
and choose from only
the following labels:

Hours, Days, Each,
Report, Contract, Miles,
Daily, Acres
0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Use Titles to briefly describe
each item. Cost Share from
the grantee and from a partner
can be tracked on separate
lines. Note that your indirect
cost rate setting (which must
be between 0 and 12%) will
automatically apply to each
line
In each rows
Description, enter the
unit of measurement
and choose from only
the following labels:

Hours, Days, Each,
Report, Contract, Miles,
Daily, Acres
0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
To be used by CAL FIRE staff
only
To be used by CAL
FIRE staff only
0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Other
Category Title Description Units Unit Cost Extended Cost Direct Cost Indirect Cost GL Account Cost Share 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
1354 $102,890.05 $176,882.00 $176,882.00 $12,381.74 $0.00 Indirect Cost Total
Other
Other Total
Grant Total
Equipment
Equipment Total
Other Costs
Other Costs Total
Indirect Cost
Contractual Total
Travel & Per Diem
Travel & Per Diem Total
Supplies
Supplies Total
Salaries & Wages
Salaries & Wages Total
Employee Benefits
Employee Benefits Total
Contractual
Budget Report
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) FY 2023-2024 Wildfire Prevention Grants
Greenfield Wildfire Prevention Plan
67 Project Area Map
68 69

A PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD PROCLAIMING MARCH 2025 AS RED CROSS MONTH
WHEREAS, this March, we celebrate American Red Cross Month by recognizing the compassionate acts of people in Greenfield and by renewing our commitment to lend a helping hand to our neighbors in need. Since Clara Barton founded the American Red Cross more than 140 years ago, generation after generation has stepped up to deliver relief and care across our country and around the world, bringing out the best of humanity in times of crisis. Advancing this noble mission, the volunteers, blood and platelet donors, and supporters who now give back through the Central Coast Chapter remain unwavering in their commitment to prevent and alleviate human suffering in the face of today’s emergencies.

WHEREAS, the contributions of local Red Cross volunteers (133 in the county) give hope to the most vulnerable in their darkest hours. Last year in Monterey County, volunteers helped 64 families affected by 30 home fires by addressing their urgent needs like food and lodging, as well as providing recovery support. In addition, they installed 655 smoke alarms, collected 1,939 blood donations, provided first aid and CPR training to 1,830 residents, and assisted 153 families of our armed forces.

WHEREAS, this work to uplift our community is truly made possible by those who selflessly answer the call to help, whenever and wherever it’s needed. We hereby recognize this month of March in honor of their remarkable service, and we ask everyone to join in their commitment to care for one another.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, Mayor Robert White, of Greenfield, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the laws of Greenfield and California, do hereby proclaim March 2025 as Red Cross Month. I encourage all citizens of Greenfield to reach out and support its humanitarian mission.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 11th day of March, in the year two thousand twenty-five, in Greenfield, California.
____________________________________
Robert White, Mayor of the City of Greenfield
70 ®

CITY OF GREENFIELD

AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
71 CITY OF GREENFIELD

TABLE OF CONTENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
Page(s)
Independent Auditor's Report ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Unaudited) ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Basic Financial Statements
Government-Wide Financial Statements
....................................................................................................................................................................................Statement of Net Position 13 ...................................................................................................................................................................................Statement of Activities 15 Fund Financial Statements
Governmental Funds
...................................................................................................................................................................................Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds 16 Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds to the Statement of Net ...................................................................................................................................................................................

Position 19
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances - Governmental ...................................................................................................................................................................................

Funds 20
Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund ...................................................................................................................................................................................Balances - Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities 23 Proprietary Funds - Financial Statements
...................................................................................................................................................................................Statement of Net Position - Proprietary Funds 24 ...................................................................................................................................................................................

Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position - Proprietary Funds 26 ...................................................................................................................................................................................Statement of Cash Flows - Proprietary Funds 27 Fiduciary Funds
...................................................................................................................................................................................

Statement of Fiduciary Net Position 29
...................................................................................................................................................................................Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position 30 ...................................................................................................................................................................................

Notes to Basic Financial Statements 31
Required Supplementary Information
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances - Budget and Actual ...................................................................................................................................................................................

General Fund 64
...................................................................................................................................................................................Home Grant Special Revenue Fund 65 ...................................................................................................................................................................................Traffic Impact Fund 66 ...................................................................................................................................................................................

General Facilities Impact Fund 67
...................................................................................................................................................................................

Housing Fund 68
...................................................................................................................................................................................Supplemental Transactions and Use Tax Fund 69 ...................................................................................................................................................................................

American Recovery Act Plan Fund 70
...................................................................................................................................................................................Fire Fund 71 ...................................................................................................................................................................................Schedule of Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability 72 ...................................................................................................................................................................................Schedule of Pension Contributions 75 72 CITY OF GREENFIELD

TABLE OF CONTENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
Page(s)
Supplementary Information
...................................................................................................................................................................................Combining Balance Sheet - Nonmajor Governmental Funds 78 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances - ...................................................................................................................................................................................Nonmajor Governmental Funds 84 ...................................................................................................................................................................................Combining Statement of Fiduciary Net Position - Private Purpose Trust Funds 90 ...................................................................................................................................................................................

Combining Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position - Private Purpose Trust Funds 91 Compliance Section
Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in ...................................................................................................................................................................................

Accordance with Government Auditing Standards 92
Schedule of Findings and Responses ................................................................................................................................................................................... 94 Status of Prior Year's Audit Findings and Responses ................................................................................................................................................................................... 96 73

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the City Council
City of Greenfield
Greenfield, California
Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements
Opinions
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the businesstype activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Greenfield (the "City"), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2023, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City, as of June 30, 2023, and the respective changes in financial position, and, where applicable, cash flows thereof for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinions
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are required to be independent of the City and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.

Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, management is required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the City's ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months beyond the financial statement date, including any currently known information that may raise substantial doubt shortly thereafter. 74 1
Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinions. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.

The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, they would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the financial statements.

In performing an audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards, we:
 Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit.  Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
 Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.  Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statements.
 Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the City's ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.

We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control-related matters that we identified during the audit.

Required Supplementary Information
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management’s discussion and analysis (Unaudited) on pages 4 through 12 and required supplementary information on pages 64 through 77 be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context.

We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. 75 2
Supplementary Information
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements. The supplementary information such as combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements, are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements and the schedule of expenditures of federal awards are fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole.

Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated March 4, 2025, on our consideration of the City’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering City’s internal control over financial reporting and compliance.

San Diego, California
March 4, 2025
76 3

CITY OF GREENFIELD

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023

INTRODUCTION
In accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 34, management of the City of Greenfield (the "City") provides the following narrative overview and analysis of the City's financial activities for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. We encourage readers to review this discussion and analysis in conjunction with the City's basic financial statements and the accompanying notes to the financial statements, which are available at the City Hall and on the City's website (www.ci.greenfeild.ca.us).

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Key financial highlights for FY 2023 are as follows:
 The assets and deferred outflows of resources of the City exceeded its liabilities and deferred inflows of resources at fiscal year-end June 30, 2023, by $74,928,173. This represents a increase of $256,307 or 0.34% from the prior fiscal year.
 As of June 30, 2023, the City's governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $34,730,885. This represents an increase of $4,206,006 or 14% from the prior fiscal year.  As of June 30, 2023, the unassigned fund balance for the General Fund was $12,061,801 or 114% of total General Fund expenditures.
 The City employs Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 68, "Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions" (GASB 68), and Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 71, "Pension Transition for Contributions Made Subsequent to the Measurement Date — an amendment of GASB Statement 68 (GASB 71). As a result, the City's net pension liability was $6,813,861.
 The City adopted Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 72, "Fair Value Measurement and Application" (GASB 72). As of June 30, 2023, the City held investments with Level 1 inputs valued at $8,270,537.

OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Management's discussion and analysis is intended to serve as an introduction to the City's basic financial statements, which include three components: 1) government-wide financial statements, 2) fund financial statements, and 3) notes to the financial statements. This report also contains other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements.

Government-Wide Financial Statements
The Government-wide Financial Statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the City's finances, in a manner similar to a private-sector business. These statements present governmental activities and business-type activities separately and contain all assets of the City as well as all liabilities (including long-term debt). In addition, certain eliminations, as prescribed by GASB Statement No. 34, have occurred with regard to interfund activity, payables and receivables.

The Statement of Net Position presents information on all of the City's assets and liabilities, and the difference between the two is reported as net position. Over time, increases or decreases in net position may serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position of the City is improving or deteriorating. 77 4

CITY OF GREENFIELD

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023

OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONT'D)
The Statement of Activities presents information showing how the government's net position changed during the most recent fiscal year. All changes in net position are reported as soon as the underlying event giving rise to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. In other words, revenues and expenses are reported in this statement for some items that will only result in cash flows in future fiscal periods (e.g., uncollected taxes or earned, but unused vacation leave).

The Government-wide Financial Statements characterize functions of the City that are principally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues as governmental activities, and other functions that are intended to recover all or a significant portion of their costs through user fees and charges as business-type activities. The governmental activities of the City include general government, public works, building and planning, parks and recreation, community development, public safety, and streets and roads. The business-type activities of the City include water and sewer utilities.

As required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, these financial statements present the financial activity of the City, which is the primary government. The City previously had a component unit (the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Greenfield) through January 31, 2012, for which the government was considered to be financially accountable. Effective February 1, 2012, Assembly Bill AB 1x26, as modified by the California Supreme Court, dissolved redevelopment agencies in California. All assets and liabilities were required to be transferred to the corresponding Successor Agency identified in each community. In Greenfield, the City became the Successor Agency and holds these assets and liabilities in Private Purpose Trust. See Note 16 on page 60 in the Notes to the Financial Statements, for further details on the Successor Agency. The City has no component units that require blended or discrete presentation in accordance with GASB Statement No. 14, as amended by GASB Statements No. 39 and No. 61.

Fund Financial Statement
A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. The City, like other state and local governments, uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal requirements. All of the funds of the City can be divided into three categories of activities: governmental funds, proprietary funds, and fiduciary funds.

Governmental Fund
Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported as governmental activities in the Government-wide Financial Statements. However, unlike the Government-wide Financial Statements, Governmental Funds Financial Statements focus on near-term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as on balances of spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may be useful in evaluating a government's near-term financing requirements.

Because the focus of Governmental Funds Financial Statements is narrower than that of Governmentwide Financial Statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar information presented for governmental activities in the Government-wide Financial Statements.

By doing so, readers may better understand the long-term impact of the government's near-term financing decisions. Both the governmental funds balance sheet and the governmental funds statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate this comparison of governmental funds to the governmental activities. 78 5

CITY OF GREENFIELD

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023

OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONT'D)
The City maintains multiple individual governmental funds. GASB Statement No. 34 requires the City's major funds to be identified and presented separately in the Governmental Funds Financial Statements.

Information for the General Fund is always considered to be a major fund and is presented separately in the governmental funds balance sheet and in the governmental funds statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances. In addition to the General Fund, the Home Grant Fund, the Traffic Impact Fund, the General Facilities Impact Fund, the Housing Fund, the Supplemental Transaction and Use Tax Fund, the American Recovery Act Plan Fund, the Fire Fund, and the Capital Projects Fund are reported as major funds. Data from the other (nonmajor) governmental funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation in the governmental funds balance sheet and in the governmental funds statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances. Individual fund data for each of these nonmajor governmental funds are provided in the form of combining financial statements in the Supplemental Information section of this report. The Supplemental Information section can be found on pages 78 through 91 of this report.

The City adopts an annual appropriations budget for all of its governmental funds. A budgetary comparison statement has been provided in the Required Supplemental Information section, for the General Fund and for seven major special revenue funds. Required Supplemental Information for these major funds can be found on pages 64 through 71 of this report.

Proprietary Funds
Proprietary Funds Financial Statements provide the same type of information as the business-type activities in the Government-wide Financial Statements, but in more detail. The City maintains two proprietary funds, the Water Fund, and the Sewer Fund. These are also known as Enterprise Funds.

Each proprietary fund is considered major and is presented individually in the fund financial statements.

Fiduciary Funds
The City maintains two fiduciary funds, which are reported as Private Purpose Trust Funds, the Successor Agency Administrative Fund, and the Successor Agency Debt Service Fund. These funds are private-purpose trust funds of the City.

Notes to Financial Statements
The notes provide additional information that is essential to a full understanding of the data provided in the government-wide and fund financial statements.

Other Information
In addition to the basic financial statements and accompanying notes, this report includes certain Required Supplemental Information, such as budgetary comparison schedules for the General Fund and Major Special Revenue Funds. The Required Supplemental Information section also features schedules of net pension liabilities and contributions. Additionally, the report provides Supplemental Information, including the combining schedules for nonmajor governmental funds and fiduciary funds.

GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
As noted earlier, net position may serve as a useful indicator of a government's financial position over time. In the case of the City, assets and deferred outflows of resources exceeded liabilities and deferred inflows of resources by $74,928,173 as of June 30, 2023. 79 6

CITY OF GREENFIELD

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023

GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS (CONT'D)
Table 1: Statement of Net Position
Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Total
June 30, 2023
June 30, 2022
As restated June 30, 2023 June 30, 2022 June 2023
June 30, 2022
As restated
Assets:

Current assets $ 41,796,248 $ 40,040,233 $ 3,808,635 $ 4,935,093 $ 45,604,883 $ 44,975,326 Noncurrent assets 30,520,101 31,998,371 17,042,997 16,945,032 47,563,098 48,943,403 Total assets 72,316,349 72,038,604 20,851,632 21,880,125 93,167,981 93,918,729 Deferred outflows of
resources 3,826,459 2,012,065 74,696 38,513 3,901,155 2,050,578 Liabilities:

Current liabilities 4,280,058 3,875,572 1,179,149 884,062 5,459,207 4,759,634 Noncurrent liabilities 9,450,946 6,770,603 4,567,123 4,820,933 14,018,069 11,591,536 Total liabilities 13,731,004 10,646,175 5,746,272 5,704,995 19,477,276 16,351,170 Deferred inflows of
resources 2,658,012 4,884,163 5,675 62,108 2,663,687 4,946,271 Net position:

Net investment in capital
assets 26,339,963 27,068,111 12,292,694 10,493,949 38,632,657 37,562,060 Restricted 25,481,323 35,457,313 - - 25,481,323 35,457,313 Unrestricted 7,932,506 (4,005,093) 2,881,687 5,657,586 10,814,193 1,652,493 Total net position $ 59,753,792 $ 58,520,331 $ 15,174,381 $ 16,151,535 $ 74,928,173 $ 74,671,866 The largest portion of the City's net position $38,632,657 or 52%, reflects its investment in capital assets (e.g., land; infrastructure; buildings and improvements; property and equipment), less accumulation depreciation and amortization and less any related debt still outstanding that was used to acquire those assets. The City uses these capital assets to provide services to citizens; consequently, these assets usually are not available for future spending. Although the City's investment in its capital assets is reported net of related debt, it should be noted that the resources needed to repay this debt must be provided from other sources, since the capital assets themselves usually are not used to liquidate these liabilities.

An additional $25,481,323 or 34% of the City's net position represents resources subject to external restrictions on how they may be used. Consistent with the prior fiscal year, as of June 30, 2023, the City is able to report positive balances in both of these categories of net position, for both the government as a whole, as well as for its separate governmental and business-type activities.

During the fiscal year, the City's total net position increased by $256,307 or 0.34% over the fiscal year 2022-2023. This net increase was comprised of an increase of $1,233,461 relating to governmental activities, and a decrease of $977,154 related to business-type activities. Information about these changes is summarized on the following page.
80 7

CITY OF GREENFIELD

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023

GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS (CONT'D)
Table 2: Changes in Net Position
Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Total
June 30, 2023
June 30, 2022
As restated June 30, 2023 June 30, 2022 June 2023
June 30, 2022
As restated
REVENUES:

Program revenues:

Charges for services $ 8,234,842 $ 11,793,730 $ 3,865,682 $ 3,914,947 $ 12,100,524 $ 15,708,677 Operating grants, and
contributions 2,812,991 4,227,203 59,212 - 2,872,203 4,227,203 Capital grants, and
contributions 1,382,811 898,507 - - 1,382,811 898,507
General revenues:

Property taxes 3,926,435 3,662,128 - - 3,926,435 3,662,128 Other taxes 9,614,645 8,018,692 - - 9,614,645 8,018,692 Other revenue 521,616 56,847 57,697 (26,539) 579,313 30,308 Total revenues 26,493,340 28,657,107 3,982,591 3,888,408 30,475,931 32,545,515 EXPENSES:

General government 9,069,651 7,614,329 - - 9,069,651 7,614,329 Public work 713,218 536,470 - - 713,218 536,470
Building and planning 1,971,778 1,536,962 - - 1,971,778 1,536,962 Park and recreation 1,242,382 1,888,021 - - 1,242,382 1,888,021 Community development 416,801 176,498 - - 416,801 176,498 Public safety 9,333,857 9,512,511 - - 9,333,857 9,512,511 Streets and roads 1,637,984 2,513,613 - - 1,637,984 2,513,613 Housing 766,488 948,741 - - 766,488 948,741
Interest on long-term debt 146,691 62,108 - - 146,691 62,108 Water - - 2,335,321 2,016,897 2,335,321 2,016,897
Sewer - - 2,585,453 2,169,667 2,585,453 2,169,667
Total expenses 25,298,850 24,789,253 4,920,774 4,186,564 30,219,624 28,975,817 Internal transfer 38,971 - (38,971) - - -
Increase (decrease) in net
position 1,233,461 3,867,854 (977,154) (298,156) 256,307 3,569,698 Net position - beginning 58,520,331 54,652,477 16,151,535 16,449,691 74,671,866 71,102,168 Net position - ending $ 59,753,792 $ 58,520,331 $ 15,174,381 $ 16,151,535 $ 74,928,173 $ 74,671,866

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE CITY'S FUNDS
As noted earlier, the City of Greenfield uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal requirements.
81 8

CITY OF GREENFIELD

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE CITY'S FUNDS (CONT'D)
Governmental Funds
The focus of the City's governmental funds is to provide information on near-term inflows, outflows, and balances of spendable resources. Such information is useful in assessing the City's financial requirements. As of June 30, 2023, the City's governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $34,730,885, an increase of $4,206,006 or 14% in comparison to the prior fiscal year.

Unassigned fund balances amounted to $4,989,147 at June 30, 2023. The remainder of the fund balance is not available for new spending because it has already been restricted or is non-spendable.

General Fund — The General Fund is the chief operating fund of the City. At June 30, 2023, the fund balance of the General Fund was $13,982,874, of which $1,921,073 is non-spendable. As a measure of the General Fund's liquidity, it can be useful to compare the unassigned fund balance to total fund expenditures. As of June 30, the unassigned fund balance was 114% of total General Fund expenditures.

The fund balance of the City's General Fund increased by $5,330,259 or 62% during the 2022-2023 fiscal year. Changes in fund balances for other major funds are summarized below:

Home Grant Fund — This special revenue fund accounts for Home Grant loans to eligible citizens for housing rehabilitation and down payment assistance. The balance increased by $29,230 or 16%.

Traffic Impact Fund — This special revenue fund accounts for Traffic Mitigation Development Impact Fees that are paid by developers to mitigate the traffic impacts of those developments. The balance increased by $177,511 or 4%.

General Facilities Impact Fund — This special revenue fund accounts for General Facilities Development Impact Fees that are paid by developers to mitigate the impact of those developments to general government facilities. The balance increased by $10,717 or 1%.

Housing Fund - This special revenue fund accounts for the administration of low and moderate-income housing loan repayments from former property tax housing increments, and for related expenditures. The balance increased by $38,151 or 3%.

Supplemental Transactions & Use Tax Fund - On November 3, 2015, a majority of Greenfield voters approved the indefinite extension of the 1.0% Transactions and Use Tax that had been due to sunset on September 30, 2017 (formerly known as "Measure X"), designated as "Measure V." In addition, a majority of Greenfield voters approved at that same election an additional 0.75% Transactions and Use Tax for a period of 5 years, designated as "Measure W". This special revenue fund is used to specifically account for those revenues received from these Transactions and Use Taxes, as well as the related expenditures of these moneys. The balance decreased by $61,612 or 5%.

Fire Fund - On July 01, 2018, the City assumed control of fire protection, and created a separate fund.

This fund accounts for public safety activity in terms of fire administration, prevention, and suppression.

This separate fund is specifically intended to make it easier for management to analyze the activity occurring in our new Fire Department. Acquiring a County District and establishing a City Department is a complex endeavor and City staff wanted to make sure that the costs and efforts were well documented and clear to the financial statement reader. The Fire fund (Fund 102) is still a component of the General Fund. At some point in the future, when Fire revenues and expenditures normalize, this fund will be rolled into the General Fund (Fund 100). The balance decreased by $549,233 or 22%. 82 9

CITY OF GREENFIELD

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE CITY'S FUNDS (Cont'd)
American Recovery Plan Act Fund - On March 11, 2021, the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) was signed into law to provide financial relief in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This fund accounts for grants received from the American Rescue Plan Act funding. The balance increased by $21,646 or 1%.

Capital Projects Fund — This fund accounts for capital projects that are of a general nature, and that are not funded by grants or enterprise revenues. The balance at June 30 decreased by $219,470 or 13%.

Proprietary Funds — The City's two enterprise funds provide the same type of information found in the Government-wide Financial Statements, but in more detail. Highlights of the annual activity for these funds have been presented previously, in the discussion of business-type activities.

Debt Administration
At the end of the fiscal year, the City had total governmental activities long-term liabilities outstanding of $10,993,014. This represents an increase of $3,495,102 from the prior fiscal year balance. At the end of the fiscal year, the City also had total business-type activities long-term liabilities outstanding of $4,901,384. In total, the City's long-term liabilities increased by $3,254,587. Additional information on the City's long-term liabilities can be found in Note 7 on pages 48 through 51 of this report. The City's pension plan is discussed in Note 11 on pages 53 through 59. Following is a table summarizing the City's outstanding long-term liabilities:

Table 3: Schedule of Outstanding Long-Term Debt
Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Total
June 30, 2023 June 30, 2022 June 30, 2023 June 30, 2022 June 30, 2023 June 30, 2022

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Notes payable $ - $ - $ 3,428,663 $ 3,621,233 $ 3,428,663 $ 3,621,233 Loan payable 3,449,384 4,150,871 1,321,640 1,450,036 4,771,024 5,600,907 Net pension liability 6,662,780 2,706,977 151,081 70,630 6,813,861 2,777,607 Compensated absences 880,850 640,064 - - 880,850 640,064 Total long-term liabilities $ 10,993,014 $ 7,497,912 $ 4,901,384 $ 5,141,899 $ 15,894,398 $ 12,639,811 Cash Management
To obtain flexibility in cash management, the City employs a pooled cash system. Under the pooled cash concept, the City invests idle cash in certain eligible securities as constrained by law. Please see Note 3, on pages 40 through 44, for additional discussion of the City's cash and investments.

Capital Assets
The capital assets of the City are those assets that are used in the performance of the City's functions, including infrastructure assets. At June 30, 2023, the City's investment in capital assets for its governmental activities and business-type activities totaled $26,339,963 and $12,292,694 (net of accumulated depreciation), respectively. During the current fiscal year, the City's net decrease in capital assets was $1,331,670. The table on the following page presents summary information on the City's capital assets.
10 83

CITY OF GREENFIELD

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE CITY'S FUNDS (Cont'd)
Table 4: Schedule of Capital Assets
Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Total
June 30, 2023
June 30, 2022
As restated June 30, 2023
June 30, 2022
As restated June 30, 2023
June 30, 2022
As restated

CAPITAL ASSETS
Land $ 6,588,665 $ 6,588,665 $ 323,537 $ 323,537 $ 6,912,202 $ 6,912,202 CIP 531,774 276,868 2,043,178 786,043 2,574,952 1,062,911 Buildings & improvements 31,550,392 31,482,871 6,620,570 6,620,570 38,170,962 38,103,441 Property & equipment 5,962,202 5,539,781 23,663,088 23,642,574 29,625,290 29,182,355 Infrastructure 9,241,151 9,241,151 - - 9,241,151 9,241,151 Total capital assets 53,874,184 53,129,336 32,650,373 31,372,724 86,524,557 84,502,060 Less: accumulated
depreciation (24,084,837) (21,910,354) (15,607,376) (14,427,692) (39,692,213) (36,338,046) Net Capital Assets $ 29,789,347 $ 31,218,982 $ 17,042,997 $ 16,945,032 $ 46,832,344 $ 48,164,014 General Fund Budgetary Highlights
As mentioned above, a detailed budgetary comparison schedule for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 is presented in the Required Supplementary Information section. The following summarizes the original and final budgets, compared with actual results for 2022-23.

Table 5: General Fund Budgetary Highlights
Original Budget Final Budget Actual
Variance
Positive
(Negative)
General fund
Revenue $ 10,982,385 $ 13,805,195 $ 14,667,639 $ 862,444 Expenditure 10,243,070 11,628,078 10,590,551 1,037,527
Other sources (uses) (602,416) (1,805,060) 1,253,171 3,058,231 Fund balance, beginning of the year 8,816,867 8,816,867 8,816,867 - Restatement - - (164,252) (164,252)
Fund balance, end of the year $ 8,953,766 $ 9,188,924 $ 13,982,874 $ 4,793,950 Revenues were $862,444 above estimates. This more than favorable outcome was due primarily to the increase in sales taxes, and the cannabis tax collection efforts of the City staff. Actual expenditures were $1,037,527 less than budgeted. This is a reflection of lower than expected spending, primarily in the categories of general government, public safety, and housing. 11 84

CITY OF GREENFIELD

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
Economic Factors and Budget - Looking Forward
The city of Greenfield expects slow organic growth in its economy through FY23-24 as new businesses take root and grow individually. The shake-out in the cannabis industry should subside as individual surviving businesses get stronger. We expect cannabis taxes to level off, as individual businesses work towards more efficient operations and eventual break-even financials. This should benefit the businesses and produce more stable, albeit slower growth in cannabis tax revenue.

Like the last 3 years, local property values are projected to show incremental increases in value, held back to a degree by the rapid increase in the federal funds rate. If the federal funds rate stabilizes, we expect more stability in both housing prices (maybe producing more sales and thus more property taxes) and sales tax, as consumers have a better chance to catch their breath and be more pragmatic about household spending.

Reimbursements from federal and state grants should bolster cash flow for the city. With the receipt of all the $4.2M American Recovery Plan Act (ARPA) federal grant, the city has an opportunity to undertake some capital improvements that might otherwise have to wait. The time constraints placed on these funds ensures that the monies are committed before 12/31/2024. The City has been very active in allocating these revenues for much needed capital expenditures that will be detailed in the FY23-24 budget.

The recent large property annexations to the City have been slow to develop through FY22-23, most likely because of the interest rate hikes, but we continue to be optimistic about development as interest rates moderate and eventually move downward.

The FY23-24 budget will again be a collaborative effort among all department heads and will move online, with the intent (within a year or so) of allowing a greater measure of transparency not only financial results, but also with our budget process and documentation. This budget is expected to be an effective plan to continue to promote the goals of the City Council and will likely continue the gradual expansion of the City’s core services.

Contacting the City's Financial Management Team
This financial report is designed to provide our citizens, taxpayers, customers, investors, and creditors with a general overview of the financial position of the City of Greenfield and to show the City's accountability for the money it receives. Questions concerning any of the information provided in this report, or requests for additional financial information, should be addressed to the City of Greenfield, Finance Department, P.O. Box 127, 599 El Camino Real, Greenfield, California 93927. 12 85

BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
86 GOVERNMENT - WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
87 CITY OF GREENFIELD

STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
JUNE 30, 2023
Governmental
Activities
BusinessType Activities Total
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and investment $ 22,524,233 $ 5,389,359 $ 27,913,592 Accounts receivable 5,851,701 537,301 6,389,002
Interest receivable 683 97,349 98,032
Notes receivable 10,135,709 - 10,135,709
Leases receivable 48,635 - 48,635
Prepaid expenses 45,961 14,952 60,913
Inventory- land held for resale 959,000 - 959,000
Internal balances 2,230,326 (2,230,326) -
Total current assets 41,796,248 3,808,635 45,604,883
Noncurrent assets
Leases receivable, net of current portion 730,754 - 730,754 Capital assets, net 29,789,347 17,042,997 46,832,344
Total noncurrent assets 30,520,101 17,042,997 47,563,098 Total assets 72,316,349 20,851,632 93,167,981

DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES
Loss on debt refunding 7,531 - 7,531
Related to pension 3,818,928 74,696 3,893,624
Total deferred outflows of resources $ 3,826,459 $ 74,696 $ 3,901,155 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 13 88

CITY OF GREENFIELD

STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
JUNE 30, 2023
Governmental
Activities
BusinessType Activities Total

LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Accounts payable $ 934,433 $ 517,556 $ 1,451,989
Accrued payroll 508,207 42,437 550,644
Accrued interest payable - 45,001 45,001
Deposits 404,592 239,894 644,486
Due to successor agency 890,758 - 890,758
Compensated absences 880,850 - 880,850
Loan payable 661,218 334,261 995,479
Total current liabilities 4,280,058 1,179,149 5,459,207 Noncurrent liabilities
Loan payable, net of current portion 2,788,166 4,416,042 7,204,208 Net pension liability 6,662,780 151,081 6,813,861
Total noncurrent liabilities 9,450,946 4,567,123 14,018,069 Total liabilities 13,731,004 5,746,272 19,477,276

DEFERRED INFLOW OF RESOURCES
Related to grants 1,681,951 - 1,681,951
Related to lease 748,272 - 748,272
Related to pension 227,789 5,675 233,464
Total deferred inflows of resources 2,658,012 5,675 2,663,687

NET POSITION
Net investment in capital assets 26,339,963 12,292,694 38,632,657 Restricted for:

Housing 514,970 - 514,970
Community development 1,071,582 - 1,071,582
Public safety 5,946,524 - 5,946,524
Streets and roads 4,950,457 - 4,950,457
Building and planning 4,813,264 - 4,813,264
Public work 6,930,019 - 6,930,019
Parks and recreation 1,254,507 - 1,254,507
Unrestricted 7,932,506 2,881,687 10,814,193
Total net position 59,753,792 15,174,381 74,928,173
Total liabilities, deferred inflow of
resources, and net position $ 76,142,808 $ 20,926,328 $ 97,069,136 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 14 89

CITY OF GREENFIELD

STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
Program Revenues
Net (Expenses)/Revenues, and
Changes in Net Position
Functions/Programs Expenses
Charges for
Services
Operating
Grants and
Contributions
Capital
Contributions
and Grants
Governmental
Activities
BusinessType
Activities Total
Governmental
activities:

General government $ 9,069,651 $ 3,228,670 $ 691,779 $ - $ (5,149,202) $ - $ (5,149,202) Public work 713,218 4,106,125 - 882,074 4,274,981 - 4,274,981 Building and
planning 1,971,778 618,655 - - (1,353,123) - (1,353,123) Parks and recreation 1,242,382 88,779 408,529 - (745,074) - (745,074) Community
development 416,801 - 679,627 170,000 432,826 - 432,826 Public safety 9,333,857 129,007 394,316 330,737 (8,479,797) - (8,479,797) Streets and roads 1,637,984 - - - (1,637,984) - (1,637,984) Housing 766,488 63,606 638,740 - (64,142) - (64,142)
Interest on long-term
debt 146,691 - - - (146,691) - (146,691)
Total governmental
activities $ 25,298,850 $ 8,234,842 $ 2,812,991 $ 1,382,811 $(12,868,206) $ - $(12,868,206) Business-type
activities:

Water $ 2,335,321 $ 2,219,673 $ 59,212 $ $ - $ (56,436) $ (56,436) Sewer 2,585,453 1,646,009 - - - (939,444) (939,444)
Total business-type
activities 4,920,774 3,865,682 59,212 - - (995,880) (995,880) Total primary
government $ 30,219,624 $ 12,100,524 $ 2,872,203 $ 1,382,811 $(12,868,206) $ (995,880) $(13,864,086) General revenues:

Taxes
Secured and unsecured property taxes 3,926,435 - 3,926,435 Sales and use tax 9,228,339 - 9,228,339
Transient lodging tax 111,019 - 111,019
Franchise tax 237,723 - 237,723
Business license tax 37,564 - 37,564
Investment income 272,915 57,697 330,612
Others 248,701 - 248,701
Total general revenues 14,062,696 57,697 14,120,393
Internal transfer 38,971 (38,971) -
Change in net position 1,233,461 (977,154) 256,307
Net position - beginning of year 60,217,516 16,151,535 76,369,051 Restatement (1,697,185) - (1,697,185)
Net position - beginning of year, restated 58,520,331 16,151,535 74,671,866 Net position - end of year $ 59,753,792 $ 15,174,381 $ 74,928,173 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 15 90

GOVERNMENTAL - FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
91 CITY OF GREENFIELD

BALANCE SHEET - GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
JUNE 30, 2023
General Fund
Home Grant
Fund
Traffic Impact
Fund
General
Facilities
Impact Fund Housing Fund
ASSETS
Cash and investment $ 795,902 $ 208,700 $ 1,073,973 $ 115,473 $ 248,521 Accounts receivable, net 4,469,502 - - - -
Interest receivable 21 6 155 - -
Notes receivable - 6,484,915 - - 3,602,194
Leases receivable 779,389 - - - -
Prepaid expenditures 25,372 - - - -
Due from other funds 8,069,682 - 3,739,136 - 57,743
Inventory-land held for resale - - - - 959,000
Advances receivable 1,895,701 - - - -
Total assets 16,035,569 6,693,621 4,813,264 115,473 4,867,458

LIABILITIES
Accounts payable 615,267 - - - -
Accrued payroll 237,072 - - - -
Deposits 404,242 - - - -
Due to other funds 47,842 - - - -
Due to successor agency - - - - -
Advances payable - - - 1,895,701 -
Total liabilities 1,304,423 - - 1,895,701 -

DEFERRED INFLOWS OF

RESOURCES
Leases 748,272 - - - -
Unavailable revenues - 6,484,915 - - 3,602,194
Unearned revenues - - - - -
Total deferred inflows of resources 748,272 6,484,915 - - 3,602,194

FUND BALANCES
Nonspendable
Prepaid expenditure 25,372 - - - -
Advances receivable 1,895,701 - - - -
Inventory - - - - 959,000
Restricted
Public safety - - - - -
Housing - 208,706 - - 306,264
Community development - - - - -
Streets and roads - - - - -
Building and planning - - 4,813,264 - -
Public works - - - - -
Parks and recreation - - - - -
Unassigned 12,061,801 - - (1,780,228) -
Total fund balances 13,982,874 208,706 4,813,264 (1,780,228) 1,265,264 Total liabilities, deferred inflows of
resources and fund balances $ 16,035,569 $ 6,693,621 $ 4,813,264 $ 115,473 $ 4,867,458 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 16 92

CITY OF GREENFIELD

BALANCE SHEET - GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
JUNE 30, 2023
Supplemental
Transactions &
Use Tax Fund Fire Fund
American
Recovery Plan
Act Fund
Capital
Projects Fund
Other
Nonmajor
Governmental
Fund
ASSETS
Cash and investment $ 762,025 $ - $ 2,464,005 $ 1,670,092 $ 15,185,542 Accounts receivable, net 570,058 346,397 - - 465,744
Interest receivable 75 - - 128 298
Notes receivable - - - - 48,600
Leases receivable - - - - -
Prepaid expenditures - - - - 527
Due from other funds - - 1,300,279 - -
Inventory-land held for resale - - - - -
Advances receivable - - - - 1,379,815
Total assets 1,332,158 346,397 3,764,284 1,670,220 17,080,526

LIABILITIES
Accounts payable 1,093 23,511 - 136,924 104,750
Accrued payroll 146,345 77,591 - - 29,103
Deposits - 350 - - -
Due to other funds - 3,319,346 - - 1,492,258
Due to successor agency - - - - 890,758
Advances payable - - - - -
Total liabilities 147,438 3,420,798 - 136,924 2,516,869

DEFERRED INFLOWS OF

RESOURCES
Leases - - - - -
Unavailable revenues - - - - 48,600
Unearned revenues - - 1,656,585 - 25,366
Total deferred inflows of resources - - 1,656,585 - 73,966

FUND BALANCES
Nonspendable
Prepaid expenditure - - - - 527
Advances receivable - - - - 1,379,815
Inventory - - - - -
Restricted
Public safety 1,184,720 - - - 4,761,804
Housing - - - - -
Community development - - - - 1,071,582
Streets and roads - - - - 4,950,457
Building and planning - - - - -
Public works - - 2,107,699 1,533,296 3,289,024
Parks and recreation - - - - 1,254,507
Unassigned - (3,074,401) - - (2,218,025)
Total fund balances 1,184,720 (3,074,401) 2,107,699 1,533,296 14,489,691 Total liabilities, deferred inflows of
resources and fund balances $ 1,332,158 $ 346,397 $ 3,764,284 $ 1,670,220 $ 17,080,526 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 17 93

CITY OF GREENFIELD

BALANCE SHEET - GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
JUNE 30, 2023
Total
Governmental
Funds
ASSETS
Cash and investment $ 22,524,233
Accounts receivable, net 5,851,701
Interest receivable 683
Notes receivable 10,135,709
Leases receivable 779,389
Prepaid expenditures 25,899
Due from other funds 13,166,840
Inventory-land held for resale 959,000
Advances receivable 3,275,516
Total assets 56,718,970

LIABILITIES
Accounts payable 881,545
Accrued payroll 490,111
Deposits 404,592
Due to other funds 4,859,446
Due to successor agency 890,758
Advances payable 1,895,701
Total liabilities 9,422,153

DEFERRED INFLOWS OF

RESOURCES
Leases 748,272
Unavailable revenues 10,135,709
Unearned revenues 1,681,951
Total deferred inflows of resources 12,565,932

FUND BALANCES
Nonspendable
Prepaid expenditure 25,899
Advances receivable 3,275,516
Inventory 959,000
Restricted
Public safety 5,946,524
Housing 514,970
Community development 1,071,582
Streets and roads 4,950,457
Building and planning 4,813,264
Public works 6,930,019
Parks and recreation 1,254,507
Unassigned 4,989,147
Total fund balances 34,730,885
Total liabilities, deferred inflows of
resources and fund balances $ 56,718,970
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 18 94

CITY OF GREENFIELD

RECONCILIATION OF THE BALANCE SHEET - GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS TO

THE STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
JUNE 30, 2023
Total fund balances - governmental funds $ 34,730,885
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Net Position are different because:

In governmental funds, only current assets are reported. In the statement of net position, all assets are reported, including capital assets and accumulated depreciation:

Capital assets at historical cost 53,874,184
Less: accumulated depreciation (24,084,837) 29,789,347
The amount of unavailable revenues that were deferred in governmental funds, but are recognized in the government-wide statements. 10,135,709 In governmental funds, deferred outflows and inflows of resources relating to pensions are not reported because they are applicable to future periods. In the statement of net position, deferred outflows and inflows of resources relating to pensions are reported. 3,591,139
In governmental funds, only current liabilities are reported. In the statement of net position, all liabilities, including long-term liabilities are reported. Long-term liabilities relating to governmental activities consist of:

Loan payable (3,449,384)
Net pension liability (6,662,780)
Compensated absence payable (880,850) (10,993,014)
In governmental funds, loss on refunding is recognized as an expenditure in the period incurred. In the government-wide statements, loss on refunding is amortized over the life of the debt. 7,531 Internal Service Funds are used by management to charge the costs of risk management, vehicle and equipment replacement, informational technology, human resources, and health insurance to individual funds.

The assets and liabilities of the Internal Service Fund are included in the governmental activities in the Statement of Net Position. (Not including the capital assets reported above.) (7,507,805)
Total net position- governmental activities $ 59,753,792 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 19 95

CITY OF GREENFIELD

STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES -

GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
General Fund
Home Grant
Fund
Traffic Impact
Fund
General
Facilities
Impact Fund

REVENUES
Taxes and assessments $ 8,884,668 $ - $ - $ -
Licenses and permits 340,218 - - -
Fines and penalties 6,010 - - -
Use of money and property 81,035 1,530 34,869 847
Intergovernmental revenue 1,083,156 - - -
Charges of services 4,149,052 27,700 142,642 9,870
Other revenue 123,500 - - -
Total revenues 14,667,639 29,230 177,511 10,717

EXPENDITURES
Current:

General government 4,101,596 - - -
Public work 253,996 - - -
Building and planning 1,227,806 - - -
Parks and recreation 526,742 - - -
Community development - - - -
Public safety 3,357,569 - - -
Streets and roads 356,354 - - -
Housing 766,488 - - -
Capital outlay - - - -
Debt service:

Principal - - - -
Interest - - - -
Total expenditures 10,590,551 - - -
Excess (deficiency) of revenues over
(under) expenditures 4,077,088 29,230 177,511 10,717

OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
Transfer in 1,753,171 - - -
Transfer out (500,000) - - -
Net financing sources (uses) 1,253,171 - - -
Net change in fund balances 5,330,259 29,230 177,511 10,717 Fund balances - beginning of year 8,816,867 179,476 4,635,753 (1,790,945) Restatement (164,252) - - -
Fund balances - end of year $ 13,982,874 $ 208,706 $ 4,813,264 $ (1,780,228) The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 20 96

CITY OF GREENFIELD

STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES -

GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
Housing Fund
Supplemental
Transactions &
Use Tax Fund Fire Fund
American
Recovery Plan
Act Fund

REVENUES
Taxes and assessments $ - $ 3,400,268 $ 1,256,142 $ -
Licenses and permits - - - -
Fines and penalties - - - -
Use of money and property 2,245 5,586 - 21,646
Intergovernmental revenue - - - 438,515
Charges of services 35,906 - 7,940 -
Other revenue - - 112,461 -
Total revenues 38,151 3,405,854 1,376,543 460,161

EXPENDITURES
Current:

General government - - - -
Public work - - - -
Building and planning - - - -
Parks and recreation - 507,610 - -
Community development - 246,955 - -
Public safety - 2,712,901 2,425,776 -
Streets and roads - - - -
Housing - - - -
Capital outlay - - - -
Debt service:

Principal - - - -
Interest - - - -
Total expenditures - 3,467,466 2,425,776 -
Excess (deficiency) of revenues over
(under) expenditures 38,151 (61,612) (1,049,233) 460,161

OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
Transfer in - - 500,000 -
Transfer out - - - (438,515)
Net financing sources (uses) - - 500,000 (438,515)
Net change in fund balances 38,151 (61,612) (549,233) 21,646 Fund balances - beginning of year 1,227,113 1,246,332 (2,525,168) 2,086,053 Restatement - - - -
Fund balances - end of year $ 1,265,264 $ 1,184,720 $ (3,074,401) $ 2,107,699 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 21 97

CITY OF GREENFIELD

STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES -

GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
Capital
Projects Fund
Other
Governmental
Funds
Total
Governmental
Funds

REVENUES
Taxes and assessments $ - $ 672,141 $ 14,213,219
Licenses and permits - - 340,218
Fines and penalties - - 6,010
Use of money and property 10,620 114,538 272,916
Intergovernmental revenue - 2,896,223 4,417,894
Charges of services - 121,318 4,494,428
Other revenue - - 235,961
Total revenues 10,620 3,804,220 23,980,646

EXPENDITURES
Current:

General government - - 4,101,596
Public work - 429,926 683,922
Building and planning - 743,972 1,971,778
Parks and recreation - - 1,034,352
Community development - 169,846 416,801
Public safety - 317,190 8,813,436
Streets and roads - 144,248 500,602
Housing - - 766,488
Capital outlay 451,457 - 451,457
Debt service:

Principal - 701,487 701,487
Interest - 146,691 146,691
Total expenditures 451,457 2,653,360 19,588,610
Excess (deficiency) of revenues over
(under) expenditures (440,837) 1,150,860 4,392,036

OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
Transfer in 221,367 287,486 2,762,024
Transfer out - (2,009,539) (2,948,054)
Net financing sources (uses) 221,367 (1,722,053) (186,030) Net change in fund balances (219,470) (571,193) 4,206,006 Fund balances - beginning of year 1,752,766 15,060,884 30,689,131 Restatement - - (164,252)
Fund balances - end of year $ 1,533,296 $ 14,489,691 $ 34,730,885 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 22 98

CITY OF GREENFIELD

RECONCILIATION OF THE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES,

AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS TO

THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
Total net changes in fund balances - governmental funds $ 4,206,006 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Activities are different because:

In governmental funds, capital outlays are reported as expenditures. However, in the statement of activities, the cost of those assets are allocated over their estimated useful lives as depreciation expense. (1,852,056) In governmental funds, the issuance or proceeds of long-term notes receivable provides current financial resources and therefore, are recognized as expenditures or revenues, respectively. In the government-wide statements, issuance or proceeds are reported as increases or reductions in assets, respectively. This amount is the net change in long-term notes receivable: 268,624 In governmental funds, pension costs are recognized when employer contributions are made. In the statement of activities, pension costs are recognized on the accrual basis. This fiscal year, the difference between accrual-basis pension costs and actual employer contributions was: (387,376)
In governmental funds, repayments of long-term debt are reported as expenditures.

In the government-wide statements, repayments of long-term debt are reported as reductions of liabilities. 701,487
In the government-wide statements, any deferred loss from debt refunding is amortized as interest over the life of the debt. Amortization of deferred loss from debt refunding, for the period is: (3,116)
In the statement of activities, compensated absences are measured by the amounts earned during the fiscal year. In governmental funds, expenditures for these items are measured by the amount of financial resources used (essentially the amount paid). This fiscal year, compensated absences used exceeded the amount earned by: (240,786)
Internal Service Funds are used by management to charge the costs of risk management, vehicle and equipment replacement, informational technology, human resources, and health insurance to individual funds. The net expense (excluding capital asset activity reported above) of the internal service funds is reported within governmental activities. (1,459,322)
Change in net position of governmental activities $ 1,233,461 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 23 99

PROPRIETARY FUND - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
100

CITY OF GREENFIELD

STATEMENT OF NET POSITION - PROPRIETARY FUNDS
JUNE 30, 2023
Water Fund Sewer Fund Total
Governmental
Activities Internal
Service Fund
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and investment $ 4,318,105 $ 1,071,254 $ 5,389,359 $ - Accounts receivable 301,075 236,226 537,301 -
Interest receivable 97,298 51 97,349 -
Due from other funds 25,761 22,081 47,842 -
Prepaid expenses 14,314 638 14,952 20,062
Total current assets 4,756,553 1,330,250 6,086,803 20,062 Noncurrent assets
Capital assets, net 7,195,938 9,847,059 17,042,997 1,039,461 Total assets 11,952,491 11,177,309 23,129,800 1,059,523

DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF

RESOURCES
Related to pension 37,553 37,143 74,696 -
Total deferred outflows of
resources 37,553 37,143 74,696 -

LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Accounts payable 311,272 206,284 517,556 52,888
Accrued payroll 21,036 21,401 42,437 18,096
Accrued interest payable 26,609 18,392 45,001 -
Service deposits 129,174 110,720 239,894 -
Due to other funds 86,868 811,485 898,353 7,456,883
Loans and notes payable 253,079 81,182 334,261 -
Total current liabilities 828,038 1,249,464 2,077,502 7,527,867 Noncurrent liabilities
Advances payable 467,215 912,600 1,379,815 -
Net pension liability 75,955 75,126 151,081 -
Loans payable, net of
current portion 1,186,015 - 1,186,015 -
Notes payable, net of
current portion 1,909,923 1,320,104 3,230,027 -
Total noncurrent liabilities 3,639,108 2,307,830 5,946,938 - Total liabilities 4,467,146 3,557,294 8,024,440 7,527,867 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 24 101

CITY OF GREENFIELD

STATEMENT OF NET POSITION - PROPRIETARY FUNDS
JUNE 30, 2023
Water Fund Sewer Fund Total
Governmental
Activities Internal
Service Fund

DEFERRED INFLOWS OF

RESOURCES
Related to pensions 3,763 1,912 5,675 -
Total deferred inflow of
resources 3,763 1,912 5,675 -

NET POSITION
Net investment in capital assets 3,846,921 8,445,773 12,292,694 1,039,461 Unrestricted 3,672,214 (790,527) 2,881,687 (7,507,805)
Total net position 7,519,135 7,655,246 15,174,381 (6,468,344) Total liabilities and net
position $ 11,990,044 $ 11,214,452 $ 23,204,496 $ 1,059,523 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 25 102

CITY OF GREENFIELD

STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN NET POSITION - PROPRIETARY FUNDS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
Water Fund Sewer Fund Total
Governmental
Activities Internal
Service Fund

OPERATING REVENUE
Charges for services $ 2,192,800 $ 1,646,009 $ 3,838,809 $ - Connection fees 25,983 - 25,983 -
Contribution - - - 2,512,694
Other operating revenue 890 - 890 -
Intergovernmental revenue 59,212 - 59,212 -
Total operating revenue 2,278,885 1,646,009 3,924,894 2,512,694

OPERATING EXPENSES
Salaries and benefits 561,761 562,555 1,124,316 845,079 Office expenses 29,888 6,520 36,408 2,712
Contractual services 511,416 983,884 1,495,300 7,510
Utilities and communications 256,199 191,548 447,747 18,982 Operating supplies 139,780 65,998 205,778 227,185
Vehicle and equipment maintenance 39,148 69,480 108,628 258,659 Professional development 53,005 51,344 104,349 94,226
Insurance - - - 2,722,665
Other 35,713 34,693 70,406 19,998
Depreciation 604,600 575,084 1,179,684 187,633
Total operating expenses 2,231,510 2,541,106 4,772,616 4,384,649 Operating income (loss) 47,375 (895,097) (847,722) (1,871,955)

NONOPERATING REVENUE
(EXPENSES)
Transfer in - 1,688,515 1,688,515 225,000
Transfer out (899,679) (827,807) (1,727,486) -
Interest income 45,886 11,811 57,697 -
Interest expenses (103,811) (44,347) (148,158) -
Total nonoperating revenue
(expenses) (957,604) 828,172 (129,432) 225,000
Change in net position (910,229) (66,925) (977,154) (1,646,955) Net position - beginning of year 8,429,364 7,722,171 16,151,535 (4,794,708) Restatement - - - (26,681)
Net position - ending of year $ 7,519,135 $ 7,655,246 $ 15,174,381 $ (6,468,344) The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 26 103

CITY OF GREENFIELD

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS - PROPRIETARY FUNDS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
Water Fund Sewer Fund Total
Governmental
Activities:

Internal
Service Fund
Cash flows from operating activities:

Receipts from customers $ 2,593,325 $ 1,639,681 $ 4,233,006 $ 2,512,694 Payments to suppliers (787,230) (1,436,264) (2,223,494) (3,380,663) Payments to employers (566,627) (565,390) (1,132,017) (838,293) Net cash provided by (used in) for operating
activities 1,239,468 (361,973) 877,495 (1,706,262)
Cash flows from capital and related financing activities:

Acquisition of capital assets (186,306) (1,091,342) (1,277,648) (422,421) Principal payments on long term debt (242,263) (78,703) (320,966) - Interest paid on long-term debt (105,306) (45,380) (150,686) - Net cash provided by (used in) for capital and related
financing activities (533,875) (1,215,425) (1,749,300) (422,421) Cash flows from noncapital financing activities:

Transfer from other funds (838,572) 1,650,112 811,540 2,128,683 Net cash provided by (used in) for noncapital
financing activities (838,572) 1,650,112 811,540 2,128,683 Cash flows from investing activities:

Investment income (36,701) 11,811 (24,890) -
Net cash provided by (used in) for investing activities (36,701) 11,811 (24,890) - Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (169,680) 84,525 (85,155) - Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 4,487,785 986,729 5,474,514 - Cash and cash equivalents, ending of year $ 4,318,105 $ 1,071,254 $ 5,389,359 $ - Reconciliation of cash and investments to the
statement of net position:

Cash and investments $ 4,318,105 $ 1,071,254 $ 5,389,359 $ - Total cash and cash equivalents $ 4,318,105 $ 1,071,254 $ 5,389,359 $ - The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 27 104

CITY OF GREENFIELD

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS - PROPRIETARY FUNDS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
Reconciliation of Operating Income/Loss to Net Cash
Provided by/Used for Operating Activities
Operating income/loss $ 47,375 $ (895,097) $ (847,722) $ (1,871,955) Adjustments to reconcile operating income/loss to net
cash provided by (used in) for operating activities:

Depreciation expenses 604,600 575,084 1,179,684 187,633 Changes in assets, deferred outflows, liabilities, and
deferred inflows:

Receivables 314,440 (6,328) 308,112 -
Prepaid expenditures 3,940 9,166 13,106 (20,062)
Deferred outflows (17,612) (18,571) (36,183) -
Accounts payable 273,979 (41,963) 232,016 (8,664)
Accrued payroll 1,757 2,707 4,464 6,786
Net pension liability 39,384 41,067 80,451 -
Deferred inflows (28,395) (28,038) (56,433) -
Net cash provided by (used in) for operating
activities $ 1,239,468 $ (361,973) $ 877,495 $ (1,706,262) The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 28 105

CITY OF GREENFIELD

STATEMENT OF FIDUCIARY NET POSITION
JUNE 30, 2023
Private Purpose
Trust Funds
Successor
Agency
ASSETS
Cash and equivalents $ 288,353
Interest receivable 37
Due from City of Greenfield 890,758
Prepaid insurance 109,603
Total assets 1,288,751

LIABILITIES
Accrued interest payable 197,096
Due within one year 927,923
Due in more than one year 12,401,772
Total liabilities 13,526,791

DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
Deferred gain on debt refunding 129,790
Total deferred inflows of resources 129,790

NET POSITION
Restricted for:

Individuals, organizations, and other governments (12,367,830) Total net position $ (12,367,830)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 29 106

CITY OF GREENFIELD

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FIDUCIARY NET POSITION
JUNE 30, 2023
Private Purpose
Trust Funds
Successor
Agency

ADDITIONS
Taxes $ 1,664,707
Investment earnings 1,449,706
Total additions 3,114,413

DEDUCTIONS
Other 8,002
Interest expenses 1,833,535
Total deductions 1,841,537
Change in net position 1,272,876
Net position, beginning of year (14,376,197)
Restatement 735,491
Net position, ending of year $ (12,367,830)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 30 107

CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A. The Reporting Entity
The reporting entity is the City of Greenfield. There are no component units included in this report that meet the reporting entity definition criteria of GASB Statement No. 14, The Financial Reporting Entity, as amended by GASB Statement No. 39, GASB Statement No. 61, GASB Statement No. 80, and GASB Statement No. 90.

B. Basis of Presentation
Financial Statements
The City's basic financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) is the acknowledged standard-setting body for establishing accounting and financial reporting standards followed by governmental entities in the United States of America.

Government-Wide Financial Statements
The Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities display information about the primary government (the "City"). These statements include the financial activities of the overall City government, except for fiduciary activities. Eliminations have been made to minimize the double counting of internal activities. Governmental activities are generally financed through taxes, intergovernmental revenues, and other non-exchange transactions.

The Statement of Activities presents a comparison between direct expenses and program revenues for each segment of the City's governmental activities. Direct expenses are those that are specifically associated with a program or function and, therefore, are clearly identifiable to a function. Program revenues include (a) charges paid by the recipients of goods or services offered by the programs, (b) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational needs of a program, and (c) fees, grants, and contributions that are restricted to financing the acquisition or construction of capital assets.

Revenues that are not classified as program revenues, including all taxes, are presented as general revenues.

Fund Financial Statements
The fund financial statements provide information about the City's funds. Separate statements for each fund category-governmental, proprietary, and fiduciary-are presented. The emphasis of fund financial statements is on major individual funds, each of which is displayed in a separate column. All remaining governmental funds are aggregated and reported as nonmajor funds.

Proprietary fund financial statements include a Statement of Net Position, a Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position, and a Statement of Cash Flows for all proprietary funds.

Proprietary funds and fiduciary funds are accounted for using the "economic resources" measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Accordingly, all assets and liabilities (whether current or noncurrent) are included in the Statement of Net Position. The Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position presents increases (revenues) and decreases (expenses) in total net position. Under the accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized in the period in which they are earned, while expenses are recognized in the period in which liability is incurred. 108
31 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONT'D B. Basis of Presentation - Cont'd
Operating revenues in the proprietary funds are those revenues that are generated from the primary operation of the fund. All other revenues are reported as non-operating revenues. Operating expenses are those expenses that are essential to the primary operations of the fund. All other expenses are reported as non-operating expenses.

Fiduciary funds are used to account for assets held by the City in a trustee capacity or as an agent for individuals, private organizations, other governmental units, and/or other funds. Fiduciary funds use the full accrual basis of accounting for reporting receivables and payables. Fiduciary funds are reported in the fund financial statements but are not included for government-wide reporting purposes.

C. Major Funds
GASB Statement No. 34 defines major funds and requires that the City's major funds are identified and presented separately in the fund financial statements. All other funds, called non-major funds, are combined and reported in a single column in the Fund Statements as Other Governmental Funds, regardless of their fund-type.

Major funds are defined as funds that have either assets, liabilities, revenues, or expenditures/expenses equal to ten percent of their fund-type total or five percent of the total for all funds. The General Fund is always a major fund. The City may also voluntarily select other funds it believes should be presented as major funds.

The City reported the following major governmental funds in the accompanying financial statements:

General Fund — This fund accounts for all financial resources except those to be accounted for in another fund. It is the general operating fund of the City.

Home Grant Fund — This fund accounts for the loans provided to eligible citizens for housing rehabilitation and down payment assistance.

Traffic Impact Fund — This fund accounts for receipt of Traffic Mitigation Development Impact Fees and their expenditures on projects to mitigate traffic impacts.

General Facilities Impact Fund — This fund accounts for receipt of General Facilities Development Impact Fees and their expenditures on projects to expand governmental facilities.

Housing Fund — This fund accounts for the receipt of the low-moderate income housing loan repayments and related low-moderate income housing expenditures.

Supplemental Transaction and Use Tax Fund — This fund accounts for receipt of voter-approved transactions and use tax and their expenditures to mitigate the reduction of, and maintain the continuation of, vital City services.

Fire Fund — This fund accounts for resources used for the operation of fire safety within the City.

American Recovery Plan Act Fund — This fund accounts for revenue from the American Rescue Plan Act funding the City was allocated for fiscal recovery. 109
32 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONT'D C. Major Funds - Cont'd
Capital Projects Fund — This fund accounts for resources used for the acquisition of various major capital improvements.

The City reported the following major proprietary funds:

Water Fund — This fund accounts for the activities of providing water to residents of the City.

Sewer Fund — This fund accounts for the activities associated with the sewage treatment plant, pumping stations, and collection systems.

Internal Service Fund — The Internal Service Fund is used to account for interdepartmental operations where it is the stated intent that costs of providing services to the department of the City on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily by charges to the user departments.

D. Basis of Accounting
The government-wide, proprietary funds, and fiduciary funds financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the full accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recorded when earned, and expenses are recorded at the time liabilities are incurred, regardless of when the related cash flows take place.

Governmental funds are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under this method, revenues are recognized when measurable and available.

The City considers all revenues reported in the governmental funds to be available if the revenues are collected within sixty days after fiscal year-end. Expenditures are recorded when the related fund liability is incurred, except for principal and interest on long-term debt, claims and judgments, and compensated absences, which are recognized as expenditures to the extent that they have matured.

Capital asset acquisitions are reported as expenditures in governmental funds. Proceeds of long-term debt and acquisitions under capital leases are reported as other financing sources.

Non-exchange transactions, in which the City gives or receives value without directly receiving or giving equal value in exchange, include property taxes, grants, entitlements, and donations. On an accrual basis, revenue from property taxes is recognized in the fiscal year for which the taxes are levied.

Revenue from grants, entitlements, and donations are recognized in the fiscal year in which all eligibility requirements have been satisfied. Other revenues susceptible to accrual include other taxes, intergovernmental revenues, interest, and charges for services.

Grant revenues are recognized in the fiscal year in which all eligibility requirements are met. Under the terms of grant agreements, the City may fund certain programs with a combination of costreimbursement grants, categorical block grants, and general revenues.

Thus, both restricted and unrestricted net assets may be available to finance program expenditures/expenses. The City's policy is to first apply restricted grant resources to such programs, followed by general revenues, if necessary.
110
33 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONT'D E. Property Taxes
California Constitution Article XIII A limits the combined property tax rate to one percent of a property's assessed valuation. Additional taxes may be imposed with voters' approval. The assessed value is calculated at one hundred percent of a property's fair value, as defined by Article XIII A, and may be increased no more than two percent per year, unless a change in ownership or new construction occurs.

The State legislature has determined the method of distributing the one percent tax levy among the various taxing jurisdictions. Property tax revenues are recognized in the fiscal year for which taxes have been levied and collected within sixty days of the fiscal year-end. Property taxes are billed and collected as follows:

Secured Unsecured
Valuation/line dates January 1 January 1
Levy dates July 1 July 1
Due dates November 1 (50%)
February 1 (50%)
August 1
Delinquency dates December 10 (Nov.)
April 10 (Feb.)
August 31
F. Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenditures, or expenses as appropriate. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

G. Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the City considers all highly liquid investment instruments purchased with maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

H. Deferred Outflows and Inflows of Resources
Pursuant to GASB Statement No. 63, "Financial Reporting of Deferred Outflows of Resources, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Net Position," and GASB Statement No. 65, "Items Previously Reported as Assets and Liabilities," the City recognizes deferred outflows and inflows of resources.

In addition to assets, the Statement of Net Position will sometimes report a separate section for deferred outflows of resources. A deferred outflows of resources is defined as a consumption of net position by the government that is applicable to a future reporting period.

In addition to liabilities, the Statement of Net Position and the Governmental Funds — Balance Sheet will sometimes report a separate section for deferred inflows of resources. A deferred inflow of resources is defined as an acquisition of net position by the City that is applicable to a future reporting period. 111
34 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONT'D I. Capital Assets
All capital assets are valued at historical cost or estimated historical cost if actual historical cost is not available. Contributed capital assets are valued at their estimated fair value on the date contributed. The City's policy is to capitalize all capital assets with costs exceeding certain minimum thresholds of $2,500 and with useful lives exceeding one year.

With the implementation of GASB Statement No. 34, the City was not required to record infrastructure assets existing or acquired prior to July 1, 2001. The City elected not to record such infrastructure assets.

The City may elect to record such infrastructure assets in the future.

The purpose of depreciation is to spread costs of capital assets equitably among all users over the lives of these assets. The amount charged to depreciation expense each fiscal year represents that fiscal year's pro rata share of the cost of capital assets. GASB Statement No. 34 requires that all capital assets with limited useful lives be depreciated over their estimated useful lives.

Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method, which means the cost of the asset is divided by its expected useful life in years, and the result is charged to expense each fiscal year until the asset is fully depreciated. The City has assigned the useful lives listed below to capital assets:

Asset Class Estimated Useful Life
Vehicles 5-7 years
Property and equipment 5-10 years
Infrastructure 10-40 years
Utility lines and equipment 10-40 years
Building and improvements 7-40 years
J. Unearned Revenue
Unearned revenue arises when assets are received before revenue recognition criteria have been satisfied. Grants and entitlements received before eligibility requirements are met are recorded as unearned revenue.

K. Lease Receivable
The City's leases receivable is measured at the present value of lease payments expected to be received during the lease term. Under the lease agreement, the City may receive variable lease payments that are dependent upon the lessee's revenue. The variable payments are recorded as an inflow of resources in the period the payment is received.

A deferred inflow of resources is recorded for the lease. The deferred inflow of resources is recorded at the initiation of the lease in an amount equal to the initial recording of the lease receivable. The deferred inflow of resources is amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. 112
35 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONT'D L. Compensated Absence
In compliance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 16, the City has established a liability for accrued sick leave and vacation in relevant funds. For governmental-type funds, the current liability appears in the respective funds. All vacation paid is accrued when incurred in the government-wide and proprietary fund financial statements.

This liability is set up for the current employees at the current rates of pay. If sick leave and vacation are not used by the employee during the term of employment, a portion of the compensation is payable to the employee at the time of retirement. Such compensation is calculated at the employee's prevailing rate at the time of retirement or termination.

Each fiscal year, an adjustment to the liability is made based on pay rate changes and adjustments for the current portion. The General Fund is primarily responsible for the repayment of the governmental portion of compensated absences.

M. Pension
For purposes of measuring the net pension liability and deferred outflows/inflows of resources related to pensions, and pension expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the City of Greenfield's California Public Employee's Retirement System (CaIPERS) plans (Plans) and additions to/deductions from the Plans' fiduciary net position have been determined on the same basis as they are reported by CaIPERS.

For this purpose, benefit payments (including refunds of employee contributions) are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Investments are reported at fair value.

N. Fund Balances
Fund balances of the governmental funds are classified as follows:
 Nonspendable Fund Balance — represents amounts that cannot be spent because they are either not in spendable form (such as inventory or prepaid insurance) or are legally required to remain intact (such as notes receivable or principal of a permanent fund).  Restricted Fund Balance — represents amounts that are constrained by external parties, constitutional provisions, or enabling legislation.
 Committed Fund Balance — represents amounts that can only be used for a specific purpose because of a formal action by the City's governing board. Committed amounts cannot be used for any other purpose unless the governing board removes those constraints by taking the same type of formal action. Committed fund balance amounts may be used for other purposes with appropriate due process by the governing board. Commitments are typically done through adoption and amendment of the budget. Committed fund balance amounts differ from restricted balances in that the constraints on their use do not come from outside parties, constitutional provisions, or enabling legislation. 113
36 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONT'D N. Fund Balance - Cont'd
 Assigned Fund Balance — represents amounts that the City intends to use for a specific purpose, but that do not meet the criteria to be classified as restricted or committed. Intent may be stipulated by the governing board or by an official or body to which the governing board delegates the authority.

Specific amounts that are not restricted or committed in a special revenue, capital projects, debt service, or permanent fund are assigned for purposes in accordance with the nature of their fund type or the fund's primary purpose. Assignments within the general fund convey that the intended use of those amounts is for a specific purpose that is narrower than the general purpose of the City.  Unassigned Fund Balance — represents amounts which are unconstrained in that they may be spent for any purpose. Only the general fund reports a positive unassigned fund balance. Other governmental funds might report a negative balance in this classification because of overspending for specific purposes for which amounts had been restricted, committed, or assigned.

When an expenditure is incurred for a purpose for which both restricted and unrestricted fund balance is available, the City considers restricted funds to have been spent first. When an expenditure is incurred for which committed, assigned, or unassigned fund balances are available, the City considers amounts to have been spent first out of committed funds, then assigned funds, and finally unassigned funds.

O. Net Position
GASB Statement No. 63 requires that the difference between assets added to the deferred outflows of resources, and liabilities added to the deferred inflows of resources, be reported as net position is classified as either net investment in capital assets, restricted, or unrestricted.

Net position that is net investment in capital assets, consists of capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation, and reduced by the outstanding principal of related debt. Restricted net position is the portion of net position that has external constraints placed on it by creditors, grantors, contributors, laws, or regulations of other governments, or through constitutional provisions or enabling legislations.

Unrestricted net position consists of net position that does not meet the definition of net investment in capital assets or restricted net position.

P. Current Accounting Pronouncement
During the year ended June 30, 2023 the City implemented the provisions of GASB Statement No. 96 Subscription-Based Information Technology Arrangements (SBITAs). This Statement requires that subscription-based information technology arrangements (SBITAs) recognize a liability and intangible assets representing the lessee’s right to use the SBITA asset and report in its financial statements amortization expense for using the SBITA asset for the shorter of the lease term or the useful life of the underlying asset, interest expense on the SBITA liability and note disclosures about the SBITA. The City's evaluated the impacts of GASB 96 and determined there to be no impact to the City's financial statements for the current fiscal year.
114
37 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - CONT'D Q. Future Accounting Pronouncement
GASB Statements listed below will be implemented in future financial statements:

The GASB has issued several new accounting pronouncements, which will be effective for the City in subsequent years. The following GASB pronouncements have been issued, but are not yet effective as of June 30, 2023:

Statement No. 99 Omnibus 2022 The provisions of this statement are effective in April 2022 except for the provisions related to leases, PPPs, SBITAs, financial guarantees and derivative instruments. The
provisions related to leases, PPPs, and SBITAs are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2022. The provisions related to financial guarantees and derivative instruments are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2023.

Statement No. 100 Accounting Changes and Error
Corrections - an amendment of
GASB Statement No. 62
The provisions of this statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2023.

Statement No. 101 Compensated Absences The provisions of this statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023.

Statement No. 102 Certain Risk Disclosures The provisions of this statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2024.

Statement No. 103 Financial Reporting Model
Improvements
The provisions of this statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2025.

Statement No. 104 Disclosure of certain capital
assets
The provisions of this statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2025.

The City will implement the applicable new GASB pronouncements in the fiscal year no later than the required effective date. The City has not yet determined the financial impact from future implementation of these standards.
115
38 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 2 - STEWARSHIP, COMPLIANCE, AND ACCOUNTABILITY
A: Budgetary Information
Annual budgets are adopted on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for governmental funds. The City's budget ordinances require that in April of each fiscal year, the City Manager submit a preliminary budget that includes projected expenditures and the means of financing them to the City Council for the fiscal year commencing the following July 1.

As modified during public study sessions, the preliminary budget becomes the proposed budget.

Following public hearings on the proposed budget, the final annual budget is adopted by the City Council in June for the following fiscal year. After adoption of the final budget, transfers of appropriations within a general fund department, or within other funds, can be made by the City Manager.

Budget modifications between funds; increases or decreases to a fund's overall budget; transfers between general fund departments; or transfers that affect capital projects, must be approved by the City Council. Numerous properly authorized amendments are made during the fiscal year.

Budgetary control is enhanced by integrating the budget into the general ledger accounts. Encumbrance accounting is employed (e.g. purchase orders) to avoid expenditures over the budget. In general, encumbrances outstanding at fiscal year-end are automatically re-budgeted in the following fiscal year.

B: Deficit Fund Balance
Major Funds:

A deficit fund balance of $1,780,228 exists in the General Facilities Impact Fund. This fund balance deficit is due to the City incurring costs in advance of receiving revenue. The City expects to fund the deficit through future revenues and/or transfers of funds.

A deficit fund balance of $3,074,401 exists in the Fire Fund. This fund balance deficit is due to the City incurring costs in advance of receiving revenue. The City expects to fund the deficit through future revenues and/or transfers of funds.

Nonmajor Funds:

A deficit fund balance of $617,948 exists in the Greenfield Science Workshop Fund. This fund balance deficit is due to the City incurring costs in advance of receiving revenue. The City expects to fund the deficit through future revenues and/or transfers of funds.

A deficit fund balance of $220,262 exists in the Debt Service Fund. This fund balance deficit is due to the City incurring costs in advance of receiving revenue. The City expects to fund the deficit through future revenues and/or transfers of funds.

Internal Service Fund:

A deficit fund balance of $6,468,344 exists in the Internal Service Fund. This fund balance deficit is due to the City incurring costs in advance of moving money into the fund to cover the services. The City expects to fund the deficit through future transfers of funds. 116
39 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 3 - CASH AND INVESTMENTS
The composition of cash and investments as of June 30, 2023, by fund is as follows:

Available
for Operations Restricted Total
General fund $ 795,902 $ - $ 795,902
Special revenue funds 20,058,239 - 20,058,239
Capital project fund 1,670,092 - 1,670,092
Proprietary funds 5,389,359 - 5,389,359
Fiduciary funds - 288,353 288,353
Total $ 27,913,592 $ 288,353 $ 28,201,945
Cash and investments at June 30, 2023, consisted of the following:

Cash in banks and on hand $ 5,397,893
Investments 22,515,699
Total cash and investments, statement of net position 27,913,592 Cash in banks and on hand 288,347
Cash and investments with fiscal agents 6
Total cash and investments, statement of fiduciary net position 288,353 Total cash and investments $ 28,201,945
Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 72, "Fair Value Measurements and Application" provides the framework for measuring fair value. The framework categorizes a fair value hierarchy that is based on the valuation inputs used to measure the fair value of the asset. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets; Level 2 inputs are significant other observable inputs; Level 3 inputs are significant unobservable inputs. The City has the following recurring fair value measurements as of June 30, 2023:

Investment by Fair Value Total
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
Debt securities:

Negotiable certificates of deposit $ 7,149,270 $ 7,149,270 $ - $ - U.S. Treasury Notes 571,314 571,314 - -
Government Bonds 549,953 549,953 - -
Total investments measured at fair value 8,270,537 $ 8,270,537 $ - $ - Investments measured at amortized cost:

Money market funds 272,452
LAIF 13,972,710
Held by fiscal agent:

Money market funds 6
TotaI investments $ 22,515,705
117
40 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 3 - CASH AND INVESTMENTS (CONT'D)
A. Investments Authorized by the California Governmental Code and the Investment Policy City's Investment Policy
The table on the following page identifies the investment types that are authorized for the City by the California Government Code. The table also identifies certain provisions of the California Government Code that address interest rate risk, credit risk, and concentration of credit risk.

Authorized Investment Type
Maximum
Maturity
Maximum
Percentage of
Portfolio
Maximum Investment in
One Issuer
Local Agency Bonds 5 years None None
U.S. Treasury Obligations 5 years None None
U.S. Agency Securities 5 years None None
State Obligations CA and Others 5 years None None
CA Local Agency Obligations 5 years None None
U.S. Agency Obligations 5 years None None
Banker's Acceptance 180 days 40% 30%
Commercial Paper 180 days 15% 10%
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 5 years 30% None
Time Deposits 5 years 25% None
Repurchase Agreements 90 days None None
Reverse Repurchase Agreements 90 days 20 % None
Medium-Term Notes 5 years 30% 15%
Mutual Funds N/A 20% 10%
Mutual Funds and Money Market
Mutual Funds N/A 20% 10%
Mortgage Pass-Through Securities 5 years 20% None
County Pooled Investment Funds N/A None None
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) N/A None $75,000,000 JPA Pools (Other Investment Pools) N/A None None
B. Investments Authorized by Debt Agreements
Investment of debt proceeds held by bond trustees are governed by the provisions of the debt agreements, rather than the general provisions of the California Government Code or the City's investment policy. The table below identifies the investment types that are authorized for investments held by fiscal agents. The table also identifies certain provisions of these debt agreements that address interest rate risk, credit risk, and concentration of credit risk. 118
41 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 3 - CASH AND INVESTMENTS (CONT'D)
B. Investments Authorized by Debt Agreements (Cont'd)
Authorized Investment Type
Maximum
Maturity
Maximum
Percentage of
Portfolio
Maximum Investment in
One Issuer
U.S. Treasury Obligations None None None
U.S. Agency Securities None None None
Banker's Acceptance 1 Year None None
Commercial Paper None None None
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit None None None
Investment Agreements None None None
Repurchase Agreements 30 days None None
Money Market Mutual Funds N/A None None
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) N/A None $75,000,000 Local Agency Bonds None None None
C. Disclosures Relating to Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in market interest rates will adversely affect the fair value of an investment. Generally, the longer the maturity of an investment, the greater the sensitivity of its fair value to changes in market interest rates. One of the ways that the City manages its exposure to interest rate risk is by purchasing a combination of shorter-term and longer-term investments, and by timing cash flows from maturities so that a portion of the portfolio is maturing or coming close to maturity evenly over time as necessary to provide the cash flows and liquidity needed for operations. Information about the sensitivity of the fair values of the City's investments to market interest rate fluctuations is provided by the following table that shows the distribution of the City's investments by maturity:

Remaining Maturity (in Months)
Investment Type
Carrying
Amount
12 Months
or Less 13-24 Months
25-60
Months
More than 60
Months
LAIF $ 13,972,710 $ 13,972,710 $ - $ - $ -
Negotiable certificates of
deposit 7,149,269 1,473,818 1,911,038 3,764,413 -
U.S. Treasury Notes 571,314 571,314 - - -
Government Bonds 549,953 549,953 - - -
Money market funds 272,452 272,452 - - -
Held by fiscal agent:

Money market funds 6 6 - - -
TotaI investments $ 22,515,704 $ 16,840,253 $ 1,911,038 $ 3,764,413 $ - 119
42 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 3 - CASH AND INVESTMENTS (CONT'D)
C. Disclosures Relating to Interest Rate Risk (Cont'd)
Generally, credit risk is the risk that an issuer of an investment will not fulfill its obligation to the holder of the investment. This is measured by the assignment of rating by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization. Presented below is the minimum rating required by the California Government Code, and the actual rating as of fiscal year end for each investment type.

Rating as of Fiscal Year End
Investment Type
Carrying
Amount
Minimum
Legal Rating Aaa AA+ Not Rated
LAIF $ 13,972,710 N/A $ - $ - $ 13,972,710
Negotiable certificates of
deposit 7,149,270 N/A - - 7,149,270
U.S. Treasury Notes 571,314 N/A 571,314 - -
Government Bonds 549,953 N/A - 549,953 -
Money market funds 272,452 N/A - - 272,452
Held by fiscal agent: N/A
Money market funds 6 N/A - - 6
TotaI investments $ 22,515,705 $ 571,314 $ 549,953 $ 21,394,438 D. Concentration of Credit Risk
The investment policy of the City contains no limitations on the amount that can be invested in any one issuer beyond that stipulated by the California Government Code. There are LAIF, Negotiable certificates of deposit and treasury notes represents 5% or more of the total City's investments.

E. Custodial Credit Risk
Custodial credit risk for deposits is the risk that, in the event of the failure of a depository financial institution, a government will not be able to recover its deposits or will not be able to recover collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The California Government Code and the City's investment policy do not contain legal or policy requirements that would limit the exposure to custodial credit risk for deposits, other than the following provision for deposits: The California Government Code requires that a financial institution secure deposits made by State or local governmental units by pledging securities in an undivided collateral pool held by a depository regulated under State law (unless so waived by the governmental unit). The fair value of the pledged securities in the collateral pool must equal at least 110% of the total amount deposited by the public agencies. California law also allows financial institutions to secure the City's deposits by pledging first trust deed mortgage notes having a value of 150% of the secured public deposits. None of the City's deposits with financial institutions in excess of the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation's limits were properly collateralized.

The custodial credit risk for investments is the risk that, in the event of the failure of the counterparty (e.g., broker-dealer) to a transaction, a government will not be able to recover the value of its investment or collateral securities that are in the possession of another party. The California Government Code and the City's investment policy do not contain legal or policy requirements that would limit the exposure to custodial credit risk for investments. With respect to investments, custodial credit risk generally applies only to direct investments in marketable securities. Custodial credit risk does not apply to a local government's indirect investment in securities through the use of mutual funds or governmental investment pools (such as LAIF).
120
43 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 3 - CASH AND INVESTMENTS (CONT'D)
F. Investment in State Investment Pool
The City is a voluntary participant in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) that is regulated by the California Government Code under the oversight of the Treasurer of the State of California. The fair value of the City's investment in this pool is reported in the accompanying basic financial statements at the amounts based upon the City's pro-rata share of the fair value provided by LAIF for the entire LAIF portfolio (in relation to the amortized cost of that portfolio). The balance available for withdrawal is based on the accounting records maintained by LAIF, which are recorded on an amortized cost basis.

NOTE 4 - NOTE RECEIVABLE
A. 2005 Community Housing Improvement Systems and Planning Association On December 28, 2005, the City entered into an agreement with the Community Housing Improvement Systems and Planning Association (CHISPA), a nonprofit housing agency, in which the City contributed $500,000 toward the cost of developing a 40- unit multi-family residential project, named Walnut Place, for low and moderate income households. In exchange for the City contribution, the City obtained a promissory note and deed of trust secured by the housing project. CHISPA agrees to maintain the project in accordance with certain low-and moderate-income restrictions imposed upon it by the City. Repayment of the $500,000 note is not due as long as CHISPA meets the requirements of the various restrictions.

Accordingly, the City has recorded a note receivable and offsetting unearned revenue, since the value of the note is not a source of readily available funding.

B. 2007 Community Housing Improvement Systems and Planning Association On May 2, 2007, the City entered into an agreement with the Community Housing Improvement Systems and Planning Association (CHISPA), a nonprofit housing agency, in which the City contributed $500,000 toward the cost of developing a 40- unit multi-family residential project, named Vineyard Green Townhomes, for low and moderate income households. In exchange for the City contribution, the City obtained a promissory note and deed of trust secured by the housing project. CHISPA agrees to maintain the project in accordance with certain low- and moderate-income restrictions imposed upon it by the City.

The loan accrues simple interest at 3% per annum and repayment of the $500,000 note is not due until 55 years from the date the Promissory Note was signed. Accordingly, the City has recorded a note receivable and offsetting unearned revenue, since the value of the note is not a source of readily available funding. At June 30, 2023, the loan had accrued interest of $198,450, bringing the loan balance to $698,450.

C. 2009 Community Housing Improvement Systems and Planning Association On April 10, 2009, the City entered into an agreement with the Community Housing Improvement Systems and Planning Association (CHISPA), a nonprofit housing agency, in which the City contributed $700,000 toward the cost of developing a 40-unit multi-family residential project, named Vineyard Green Townhomes, for low and moderate income households. In exchange for the City contribution, the City obtained a promissory note and deed of trust secured by the housing project. CHISPA agrees to maintain the project in accordance with certain low- and moderate-income restrictions imposed upon it by the City.

The loan accrues simple interest at 3% per annum and repayment of the $700,000 note is not due until 55 years from the date the Promissory Note was signed. Accordingly, the City has recorded a note receivable and offsetting unearned revenue, since the value of the note is not a source of readily available funding. At June 30, 2023, the loan had accrued interest of $256,749, bringing the loan balance to $941,843.
121
44 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 4 - NOTE RECEIVABLE (CONT'D)
D. Magnolia Place
On November 25, 2014, the City entered into a loan agreement with Greenfield Senior Associates, for the construction of 32 units of senior rental housing, to include 4 very-low income units, 27 low-income units, and one manager's unit. The agreement included an acquisition loan and a fee deferral loan. The City contributed $708,000 toward the acquisition costs of the property, and $250,000 toward the deferral of development impact fees. In exchange for the City contribution, the City obtained a promissory note for each loan, a loan agreement for both notes, and a deed of trust secured by the project. The term of the acquisition loan is 55 years from the date the Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the project, at 0% interest from disbursement through the earlier of the permanent loan conversion or the third anniversary of the construction loan closing, and thereafter at a rate between 0% and 3%, to be set by the City Manager.

The term of the fee deferral loan is 30 years from the date of the Certificate of Occupancy, at 0% interest from disbursement through the earlier of the permanent loan conversion or the third anniversary of the construction loan closing, and thereafter at a rate of 3%. Loans are repaid annually in arrears, after conversion from the construction loan to the permanent loan, and no later than April 15 of each year with respect to the previous calendar year, in amounts for each loan equal to 50% of the Residual Receipts.

Both loans become due and payable if the developer transfers or sells the project without approval of the City. The City has recorded a note receivable and offsetting unearned revenue for the acquisition loan, since the value of the note is not a source of readily available funding. The fee deferral loan will be recorded as a note receivable at the time that the fee deferral occurs.

E. Down Payment Assistance Program (CDBG)
The City has received funding from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), via the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program to help low-and moderate- income residents and commercial enterprises purchase property by assisting them with loans to make down payments.

The promissory notes accrue simple interest of 3% and the repayment of the principal and interest is deferred for 30 years, unless the property is sold or transferred. Accordingly, the City has recorded notes receivable and offsetting deferred revenue, since the value of the notes is not a source of readily available funding. At June 30, 2023, there was one such note receivable for a total balance of $48,600.

F. Down Payment Assistance Program
At June 30, 2023, the City held $592,671 in promissory notes secured by deeds of trust on various residential properties for households that participated in the City's down payment assistance program for low and moderate-income households.

The promissory notes accrue simple interest of 3% and repayment of the principal and interest is deferred for 30 years, unless the property is sold or transferred. Accordingly, the City has recorded notes receivable and offsetting deferred revenue, since the value of the notes is not a source of readily available funding.

G. Housing Rehabilitation
The City provides loans to eligible citizens through the Housing Fund and Home Grant Fund for housing rehabilitation. Interest is generally deferred and repayment occurs when property ownership changes.

The balance outstanding at June 30, 2023, is $1,021,597, which is offset by unearned revenue in the governmental funds financial statements.
122
45 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 4 - NOTE RECEIVABLE (CONT'D)
G. Housing Rehabilitation (Cont'd)
As part of the Home program, in October 2015, the City entered into a Promissory Note with Greenfield Pacific Associates II, LP for a $4,500,000 advance for the construction of the Terracina Oaks housing project. The terms of the note repayment is 55 years from the Notice of Completion, or no more than 58 years from October 2015. The outstanding principal balance incurs 3% simple interest from the date of disbursement. The note will be payable from the residual receipts collected from the Project. The balance outstanding at June 30, 2023 is $5,463,318, which includes $963,318 in accrued interest, and is offset by deferred revenue in the governmental funds financial statements.

NOTE 5 - CAPITAL ASSETS
Capital assets activity for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023, was as follows:

Balance
July 1, 2022 Restatement Additions Deletions Reclass
Balance
June 30, 2023
Governmental activities
Nondepreciable capital assets:

Land $ 6,588,665 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,588,665
Construction in progress 276,868 - 319,893 (64,987) - 531,774 Total nondepreciable capital
assets 6,865,533 - 319,893 (64,987) - 7,120,439
Depreciable capital assets:

Buildings 31,482,871 - 67,521 - (600,000) 31,550,392
Property and equipment 5,539,781 - 422,421 - 600,000 5,962,202 Infrastructure 9,241,151 - - - - 9,241,151
Total depreciable capital asset 46,263,803 - 489,942 - - 46,753,745 Less: accumulated depreciation (20,377,421) (1,532,933) (2,174,483) - - (24,084,837) Net depreciable assets 25,886,382 (1,532,933) (1,684,541) - - 22,668,908 Net capital assets $ 32,751,915 $ (1,532,933) $ (1,364,648) $ (64,987) $ - $ 29,789,347 Beginning
Balance Additions Deletions
Ending
Balance
Business-type activities
Nondepreciable capital assets:

Land $ 323,537 $ - $ - $ 323,537
Construction in progress 786,043 1,257,135 - 2,043,178
Total nondepreciable capital
assets 1,109,580 1,257,135 - 2,366,715
Depreciable capital assets:

Building, property and equipment 30,263,144 20,514 - 30,283,658 Total depreciable capital asset 30,263,144 20,514 - 30,283,658 Less: accumulated depreciation (14,427,692) (1,179,684) - (15,607,376) Net depreciable assets 15,835,452 (1,159,170) - 14,676,282 Net capital assets $ 16,945,032 $ 97,965 $ - $ 17,042,997 123
46 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 5 - CAPITAL ASSETS (CONT'D)
Depreciation expense was charged to function and programs based on their usage of the related assets.

The amounts allocated to each function or program were as follows:

Governmental Activities:

General government $ 279,354
Public work 29,296
Parks and recreation 208,030
Public safety 520,421
Streets and roads 1,137,382
Total depreciation expense $ 2,174,483
Business-type Activities:

Water $ 604,600
Sewer 575,084
Total depreciation expense $ 1,179,684
NOTE 6 - DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESORCES
As of June 30, 2023, deferred inflows of resources were reported on the Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds, consisted of the following:

Unavailable
Revenues
Unearned
Revenues
Major fund:

Home grant fund $ 6,484,915 $ -
Housing fund 3,602,194 -
American recovery plan act fund - 1,656,585
Nonmajor fund:

CDBG fund 48,600 -
Community Outreach Fund - 25,366
Total $ 10,135,709 $ 1,681,951
124
47 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 7 — LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
A. Loans Payable
On December 30, 2015, the lease was refunded by the 2015 Refunding Civic Center Lease. The refunding resulted in an overall debt service savings of $188,247, and the net present value of the debt service savings, called an economic gain, amounted to $169,357. Refunding also resulted in an accounting loss of $31,165, which is amortized over the life of the 2015 lease. The refunding lease accrues interest at 1.9 % and has semi-annual lease payments due December 30 and June 30 each year. Future minimum lease payments are as follows:

Fiscal Year
Ending June 30 Principal Interest Total
2024 $ 175,138 $ 7,433 $ 182,571
2025 178,481 4,089 182,570
2026 81,366 773 82,139
Total $ 434,985 $ 12,295 $ 447,280
On December 10, 2015, the City entered into a lease agreement with PNC Equipment Finance, LLC. The lease proceeds were used for the acquisition and installation of an energy conservation project. The lease amount was $4,120,377 and accrues interest at 3.163 %. The lease is secured by all equipment under the lease, and the moneys and investments are held in the escrow fund. Semi-annual lease payments are due June 10 and December 10 of each year, commencing on December 10, 2016. Future minimum lease payments are as follows:

Fiscal Year
Ending June 30 Principal Interest Total
2024 $ 287,695 $ 86,155 $ 373,850
2025 311,973 76,935 388,908
2026 337,608 66,942 404,550
2027 364,668 56,134 420,802
2028 393,223 44,465 437,688
2029-2031 1,120,847 54,042 1,174,889
Total $ 2,816,014 $ 384,673 $ 3,200,687
On September 30, 2016, the City entered into a lease agreement with PNC Equipment Finance, LLC.

The lease proceeds were used for the acquisition and installation of an energy conservation project. The amount of the lease was $2,163,836 and accrues interest at 2.782%. The lease is secured by all equipment under the lease, and the moneys and investments are held in the escrow fund. Semi-annual lease payments are due June 10 and December 10 of each year, commencing June 10, 2017. Future minimum lease payments are as shown:
125
48 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 7 — LONG-TERM LIABILITIES (CONT'D)
A. Loans Payable (Cont'd)
Fiscal Year
Ending June 30 Principal Interest Total
2024 $ 135,625 $ 36,027 $ 171,652
2025 143,028 32,202 175,230
2026 150,604 28,170 178,774
2027 158,352 23,926 182,278
2028 166,269 19,465 185,734
2029-2031 567,762 27,685 595,447
Total $ 1,321,640 $ 167,475 $ 1,489,115
On March 14, 2019, the City entered into a lease agreement with Motorola Solutions, Inc. The lease proceeds were used to purchase Police radios. The amount of the lease was $200,329 and accrues at

5.220%. Annual payments are due each year commencing March 2020. Future minimum lease payments are as follows:

Fiscal Year
Ending June 30 Principal Interest Total
2024 $ 44,344 $ 2,371 $ 46,715
Total $ 44,344 $ 2,371 $ 46,715
On February 1, 2019, the City entered into a lease agreement with KS State Bank. The lease proceeds were used to purchase a citywide surveillance system. The amount of the lease was $1,161,397 and accrues at 4.13%. Payments of $21,628 are due monthly commencing February 2019. Future minimum lease payments are as follows:

Fiscal Year
Ending June 30 Principal Interest Total
2024 $ 154,041 $ 7,506 $ 161,547
Total $ 154,041 $ 7,506 $ 161,547
126
49 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 7 — LONG-TERM LIABILITIES (CONT'D)
B. California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank Loan Agreement In September 2006, the City entered into two direct borrowing loan agreements with the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank (CIEDB). The agreements provide financing for two projects within the City: the 10th Street Water Expansion Project and the Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion. The Water Expansion Project financing agreement is $3,700,000 and the Wastewater Plant Expansion financing agreement is $2,360,000. The loans were at an interest rate of 3.15% with semiannual payments due in August and February of each year.

The future minimum payment obligation for the Water Plant Expansion loan agreement at June 30, 2023, is as follows:

Fiscal Year
Ending June 30 Principal Interest Total
2024 $ 117,454 $ 62,013 $ 179,467
2025 121,154 58,254 179,408
2026 124,970 54,378 179,348
2027 128,907 50,379 179,286
2028 132,967 46,255 179,222
2029-2033 730,365 164,714 895,079
2034-2037 671,560 43,128 714,688
Total $ 2,027,377 $ 479,121 $ 2,506,498
The future minimum payment obligation for the Wastewater Plant Expansion loan agreement at June 30, 2023, is as follows:

Fiscal Year
Ending June 30 Principal Interest Total
2024 $ 81,182 $ 42,862 $ 124,044
2025 83,739 40,264 124,003
2026 86,377 37,585 123,962
2027 89,098 34,821 123,919
2028 91,905 31,971 123,876
2029-2033 504,815 113,847 618,662
2034-2037 464,170 29,809 493,979
Total $ 1,401,286 $ 331,159 $ 1,732,445
127
50 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 7 — LONG-TERM LIABILITIES (CONT'D)
C. Compensated Absences
Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 16 identifies certain items that should be accrued as a liability as benefits are earned by employees, but only to the extent it is probable that the employer will compensate the employees for the benefits through cash payments conditioned on the employee's termination or retirement.

The City's employees accumulate earned but unused benefits, which can be converted to cash at termination of employment. The non-current portion of these vested benefits, payable in accordance with various collective bargaining agreements, at June 30, 2023, total $880,850 for governmental activities.

NOTE 8 - CHANGES IN LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
The following is a summary of long-term liability activities for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023:

Balance
July 01, 2022 Additions Deletions
Balance
June 30, 2023
Due Within
One Year
Governmental activities:

Loans payable $ 4,150,871 $ - $ 701,487 $ 3,449,384 $ 661,218 Net pension liability 2,706,977 3,955,803 - 6,662,780 - Compensated absences 640,064 240,786 - 880,850 -
Total $ 7,497,912 $ 4,196,589 $ 701,487 $ 10,993,014 $ 661,218 Business-type activities:

CIEDB water loan - direct
borrowing 2,141,244 - 113,867 2,027,377 117,454
CIEDB sewer loan - direct
borrowing 1,479,989 - 78,703 1,401,286 81,182
Loans payable 1,450,036 - 128,396 1,321,640 135,625
Net pension liability 70,630 80,451 - 151,081 -
Total $ 5,141,899 $ 80,451 $ 320,966 $ 4,901,384 $ 334,261 NOTE 9 - DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESORCES - DEBT REFUNDING At June 30, 2023, deferred outflows of resources relating to debt refunding, reported in the statement of net position consisted of the following:

Governmental
Activities
Deferred charge on refunding $ 7,531
128
51 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 10 - INTERFUND TRANSACTIONS
Interfund transactions are reported as either advances, services provided, reimbursements, or transfers.

Advances are reported as interfund receivables and payables, as appropriate, and are subject to elimination upon consolidation. Services provided, deemed to be at market or near market rates, are treated as revenues and expenditures/expenses. Reimbursements occur when one fund incurs a cost, charges the appropriate benefiting fund, and reduces its related cost as a reimbursement. All other interfund transactions are treated as transfers. Transfers among governmental funds are netted as part of the reconciliation to the government-wide financial statements.

A. Transfers In/Out
Individual transfers made in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023, are as follows:

Fund Transfer In Transfer Out
Major governmental funds:

General fund $ 1,753,171 $ (500,000)
Fire fund 500,000 -
Capital Projects fund 221,367 -
American Recovery Plan Act Fund - (438,515)
Nonmajor governmental funds: 287,486 (2,009,538)
Propriety funds 1,913,515 (1,727,486)
Total $ 4,675,539 $ (4,675,539)
B. Due To/From Other Funds
Individual fund interfund receivable and payable balances at June 30, 2023, are as follows:

Fund Due From Due To
Major governmental funds:

General fund $ 8,069,682 $ (47,842)
Traffic impact fund 3,739,136 -
Housing fund 57,743 -
American recovery plan act fund 1,300,279 -
Fire fund - (3,319,346)
Nonmajor governmental funds: - (2,383,016)
Propriety funds:

Internal service fund - (7,456,883)
Water fund 25,761 (86,868)
Sewar fund 22,081 (811,485)
Fiduciary funds:

RDA Successor Agency Admin Fund 5,260,480 -
RDA Successor Agency Debt Service Fund - (4,369,722)
Total $ 18,475,162 $(18,475,162)
129
52 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 10 - INTERFUND TRANSACTIONS (CONT'D)
C. Advances Receivable and Payable
Advances receivable and payable constitute long-term borrowing between funds. Individual advances receivable and payable balances at June 30, 2023, are as follows:

Fund
Advances
Receivables
Advances
Payables
Major governmental funds:

General fund $ 1,895,701 $ -
General facilities impact fund - (1,895,701)
Nonmajor governmental funds:

Debt service fund 1,379,815 -
Proprietary funds:

Water fund - (467,215)
Sewer funds - (912,600)
Total $ 3,275,516 $ (3,275,516)
NOTE 11 - PENSION PLAN
A. General Information about the Pension Plans
Plan Description
All qualified permanent and probationary employees are eligible to participate in the City's separate Safety (Police & Fire) and Miscellaneous Employee Pension Plans, cost-sharing multiple employer defined benefit plans administered by the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS).

Benefit provisions under the Plans are established by State statute and City resolution. CalPERS issues publicly available reports that include a full description of the pension plans regarding benefit provisions, assumptions and membership information that can be found on the CalPERS' website.

Benefits Provided
CalPERS provides service retirement and disability benefits, annual cost of living adjustments and death benefits to plan members, who must be public employees and beneficiaries. Benefits are based on years of credited service, equal to one year of full-time employment. Members with five years of total service are eligible to retire at age 50 with statutorily reduced benefits.

All members are eligible for non-duty disability benefits after 10 years of service. The death benefit is one of the following: the Basic Death Benefit, the 1957 Survivor Benefit, or the Optional Settlement 2W Death Benefit. The cost-of-living adjustments for each plan are applied as specified by the Public Employees' Retirement Law.
130
53 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 11 - PENSION PLAN (CONT'D)
A. General Information about the Pension Plans (Cont'd) The Plans provisions and benefits in effect at June 30, 2023, are summarized as follows:

Miscellaneous
Hire date
Prior to
January 1, 2013
On or after
January 1, 2013
Benefit formula 2% at 55 2% at 62
Benefit vesting schedule 5 years service 5 years service Benefit payments Monthly for life Monthly for life
Retirement age 50-63 52-67
Monthly benefits, as a % of eligible
compensation

1.426%-2.418% 1.0% to 2.5%
Required employee contribution rates 7% 7.75%
Required employer contribution rates 10.32%+238,735 7.47%+6,596 Safety
Police Fire
Hire date
Prior to
January 1, 2013
On or after
January 1, 2013
Prior to
January 1, 2013
On or after
January 1, 2013
Benefit formula 2% at 50 2.7% at 57 2% at 50 2.7% at 57 Benefit vesting schedule 5 years of service 5 years of service 5 years of service 5 years of service Benefit payments Monthly for life Monthly for life Monthly for life Monthly for life Retirement age 50-55 50-57 50-55 50-57
Monthly benefits, as a % of eligible
compensation 2.0% to 2.7% 2.0% to 2.7% 2.0% to 2.7% 2.0% to 2.7% Required employee contribution rates 9% 13.75% 9% 13.75% Required employer contribution rates 18.17%+240,134 12.78%+12,429 20.64%+16,767 12.78%+12,429 Contributions
Section 20814(c) of the California Public Employees' Retirement Law requires that the employer contribution rates for all public employers be determined on an annual basis by the actuary and shall be effective on July 1 following notice of a change in the rate. Funding contributions for the Plans are determined annually on an actuarial basis as of June 30 by CalPERS. The actuarially determined rate is the estimated amount necessary to finance the costs of benefits earned by employees during the year, with an additional amount to finance any unfunded accrued liability.

The City is required to contribute the difference between the actuarially determined rate and the contribution rate of employees. Contributions to the pension plan from the City during the 2022-23 fiscal year were $536,495 for the miscellaneous plan and $720,845 for the safety plan. 131
54 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 11 - PENSION PLAN (CONT'D)
B. Pension Liabilities, Pension Expenses, and Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions
At June 30, 2023, the City reported a liability of $3,113,176 for the miscellaneous plan and $3,700,685 for the safety plan for its proportionate share of the net pension liability. The net pension liability was measured as of June 30, 2022, and the total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of June 30, 2021, rolled forward to June 30, 2022, using standard update procedures. The City's proportion of the net pension liability was based on a projection of the City's long-term share of contributions to the pension plan relative to the projected contributions of all pension plan participants, actuarially determined. At June 30, 2023, the City's proportionate share of the net pension liability for each Plan as of June 30, 2023, and June 30, 2022, was as shown below:

Miscellaneous Safety
Proportion - June 30, 2022 0.07143 % 0.04050 %
Proportion - June 30, 2023 0.06653 % 0.05386 %
Changes - Increase (Decrease) (0.00490) % 0.01336 %
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023, the City recognized pension expense of $375,211. Pension expense represents the change in the net pension liability during the measurement period, adjusted for actual contributions and the deferred recognition of changes in investment gain/loss, actuarial gain/loss, actuarial assumptions or method, and plan benefits.

At June 30, 2023, the City reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pension from the sources on the following page:

Deferred
Outflows of
Resources
Deferred
Inflows of
Resources
Differences between expected and actual experience $ 215,677 $ (82,059) Changes of assumptions 692,151 -
Net difference between projected and actual earnings on retirement plan investments 1,154,641 -
Changes in proportion and differences between City
contributions and proportionate share of contributions 30,048 (146,144) Adjustment due to differences in proportion 543,767 (5,261) City contributions subsequent to the measurement date 1,257,340 - Total $ 3,893,624 $ (233,464)
Deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources above represent the unamortized portion of changes to net pension liability, to be recognized in future periods in a systematic and rational manner. $1,257,340 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting from City contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the fiscal year ending June 30, 2024.
132
55 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 11 - PENSION PLAN (CONT'D)
B. Pension Liabilities, Pension Expenses, and Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions (Cont'd)
Other amounts reported as deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in the pension expenses as follows:

Fiscal Year
Ended June 30, Amount
2024 $ 798,726
2025 600,165
2026 298,659
2027 705,270
Total $ 2,402,820
Actuarial Assumptions
The total pension liability in the June 30, 2021, actuarial valuation was determined using the following actuarial assumptions:

Miscellaneous Safety
Valuation date June 30, 2021 June 30, 2021
Measurement date June 30, 2022 June 30, 2022
Actuarial cost method Entry-age normal Entry-age normal Actuarial assumptions:

Discount rate 6.90% 6.90%
Inflation 2.30% 2.30%
Payroll growth 2.75% 2.75%
Projected salary increases Varies by entry age and service Varies by entry age and service Investment rate of return 6.90% 6.90%
Mortality
Derived using CalPERS'
membership data for all funds (1)
Derived using CalPERS'
membership data for all funds (1)
(1) The mortality table was developed based on CalPERS-specific data. The rates incorporate Generational Mortality to capture ongoing mortality improvement using 80% of Scale MP 2020 published by the Society of Actuaries. For more details, please refer to the 2021 experience study report.
133
56 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 11 - PENSION PLAN (CONT'D)
B. Pension Liabilities, Pension Expenses, and Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions (Cont'd)
Discount Rate
The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 6.90%. To determine whether the municipal bond rate should be used in the calculation of a discount rate for public agency plans (including PERF C), CaIPERS stress tested plans that would be most likely to result in a discount rate that would be different from the actuarially assumed discount rate. Based on the testing of the plans, the tests revealed the assets would not run out. Therefore, the current 6.90% discount rate is appropriate, and the use of the municipal bond rate calculation is not deemed necessary. The long-term expected discount rate of

6.90% is applied to all plans in the Public Employees Retirement Fund, including PERF C. The stress test results are presented in a detailed report called "GASB Crossover Testing Report" that can be obtained at CalPERS' website under the GASB 68 section.

On November 17, 2021, the board adopted a new strategic asset allocation with the new capital market assumptions, economic assumptions, and administrative expense assumptions support a discount rate of

6.90% (net of investment expense but without a reduction for administrative expense) for financial reporting purposes. This includes a reduction in the price inflation assumption from 2.50% to 2.30%, as recommended in the November 2021 CalPERS' Experience Study and Review of Actuarial Assumptions.

This study also recommended modifications to retirement rates, termination rates, mortality rates, and rates of salary increases that were adopted by the board. These new assumptions are reflected in the GASB Statement No. 68 accounting valuation reports for the June 30, 2022, measurement date. The long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was determined using a building-block method in which best-estimate ranges of expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net pension plan investment expense, and inflation) are developed for each major asset class.

In determining the long-term expected rate of return, CaIPERS took into account long-term market return expectations as well as the expected pension fund cash flows. Using historical returns of all the funds' asset classes, expected compound returns were calculated over long-term (11+ years) using a buildingblock approach. Using the expected nominal returns for both short-term and long-term, the present value of benefits were calculated for each fund. The expected rate of return was set by calculating the single equivalent expected return that arrived at the same present value of benefits for cash flows as the one calculated using both short-term and long-term returns. The expected rate of return was then set equivalent to the single equivalent rate calculated above and rounded down to the nearest one quarter of 1%.
134
57 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 11 - PENSION PLAN (CONT'D)
B. Pension Liabilities, Pension Expenses, and Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions (Cont'd)
The table below reflects the long-term expected real rate of return by asset class. The rate of return was calculated using the capital market assumptions applied to determine the discount rate and asset allocation. These geometric rates of return are net of administrative expenses.

Asset Class
Asset
Allocation
Real Return
Years 1¹ ²
Global Equity-Cap-weighted 30.00% 4.54%
Global Equity Non-Cap-weighted 12.00% 3.84%
Private Equity 13.00% 7.28%
Treasury 5.00% 0.27%
Mortgage- backed Securities 5.00% 0.50%
Investment Grade Corporate 10.00% 1.56%
High Yield 5.00% 2.27%
Emerging Market Debt 5.00% 2.48%
Private Debt 5.00% 3.57%
Real Assets 15.00% 3.21%
Leverage (5.00%) (0.59%)
Total 100.00%
1) An expected inflation of 2.30% was used for this period. 2) Figures are based on the 2021-22 Asset Liability Management study.

Sensitivity of the Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability to Changes in Discount Rate The following represents the City's proportionate share of the net pension liability calculated using the discount rate of 6.90%, as well as what the City's proportionate share of the net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is one percentage point lower (5.90 %) or one percentage point higher (7.90 %) than the current rate:

Miscellaneous Safety
1% decrease 5.90 % 5.90 %
Net pension liability $ 4,912,903 $ 5,990,984
Current discount rate 6.90 % 6.90 %
Net pension liability $ 3,113,176 $ 3,700,685
1% increase 7.90 % 7.90 %
Net pension liability $ 1,632,448 $ 1,828,883
Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position
Detailed information about the pension plan's fiduciary net position is available in the separately issued CaIPERS' financial reports.
135
58 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 11 - PENSION PLAN (CONT'D)
C. Payable to the Pension Plan
At June 30, 2023, the City had no amount outstanding for contributions to the pension plan required for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023.

NOTE 12 - LEASES RECEIVABLE
In March of 2014, the City entered into a lease with AT&T (New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC) for a cell site on Oak Avenue. Under the lease, AT&T agreed to pay the City $30,000 a year with annual 3% increases on April 5 of each year through April 2040. The lease receivable is measured as the present value of the future minimum rent payments expected to be received during the lease term at a discount rate of 1.5%, which is the implicit rate used for the agreement. In fiscal year 2023, the City recognized $28,060 of lease revenue and $11,083 of interest revenue under the lease, with a lease receivable remaining of $712,228 as of June 30, 2023.

In April 2021, the City entered into a lease with the County of Monterey for office space for the 3rd District Supervisor's Office in the City Hall. Under the lease, the County of Monterey agreed to pay the City $1,625 per month through December 31, 2022, which has subsequently been extended for a 4-year term.

The lease receivable is measured as the present value of the future minimum rent payments expected to be received during the lease term at a discount rate of 0.9%, which is the implicit rate used for the agreement. In fiscal year 2023, the City recognized $18,804 of lease revenue and $696 of interest revenue under the lease, with a lease receivable remaining of $67,161 as of June 30, 2023.

NOTE 13 - LIABILITY, WORKERS' COMPENSATION, AND PURCHASED INSURANCE A. Description of Self-Insurance Pool Pursuant to Joint Powers Agreement The City of Greenfield is a member of the Monterey Bay Area Self Insurance Authority (the "Authority").

The Authority is composed of 10 California public entities and is organized under a joint power agreement pursuant to California Government Code §6500 et. seq. The purpose of the Authority is to coordinate and administer programs for the pooling of self-insured losses, to purchase excess insurance or reinsurance, and to arrange for group purchased insurance for property and other lines of coverage.

B. Self-Insurance Programs of the Authority
General Liability — The City is self-insured for the first $10,000 of each liability claim. Claims above $10,000 up to $1 million are paid by the Authority. Claims above $1 million are covered by California Affiliated Risk Management Authorities, purchased by the Authority.

Workers Compensation — The City does not retain a self-insured portion of workers' compensation claims. Annual premiums for coverage up to statutory levels are paid to the Authority based on the level of claims activity. A third-party administrator is contracted by the Authority to manage claims activity.

C. Purchased Insurance
Property Insurance —The City purchases all-risk property coverage through a commercial insurance agency. The program limit is $1,000,000,000.
136
59 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 13 - LIABILITY, WORKERS' COMPENSATION, AND PURCHASED INSURANCE (CONT'D) D. Adequacy of Protection
During the past three fiscal (claims) years, none of the above programs of protection have had settlements or judgements that exceeded pooled or insured coverage. There have been no significant reductions in pooled or insured liability coverage from coverage in the prior fiscal year.

NOTE 14 - CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS
Legal
The City is involved in various litigations. In the opinion of management and legal counsel, the disposition of all litigation pending will not have a material effect on the City's financial statements.

Grant Programs
The City has received State and Federal funds for specific purposes that are subject to review and audit by the grantor agencies. Although such audits could generate expenditure disallowances under terms of the grants, it is believed that any required reimbursements will not be material.

Construction and Other Significant Commitments
There were no construction contingencies as of June 30, 2023.

NOTE 15 — REVENUE LIMITATIONS IMPOSED BY CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION 218 Proposition 218, which was approved by the voters in November 1996, regulates the City's ability to impose, increase, and extend taxes, assessments, and fees. Any new, increased, or extended taxes, assessments, and fees subject to the provisions of Proposition 218, require voter's approval before they can be implemented. Additionally, Proposition 218 provides that these taxes, assessments, and fees are subject to the voter's initiative process and may be rescinded in future years by the voters.

NOTE 16 — SUCCESSOR AGENCY
2016 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds
On January 27, 2016, the Successor Agency issued $17,915,000 in Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds at interest rates ranging from 3.625 to 6.0 %. The proceeds of the bonds were used to refund the 2002 and 2006 Tax Allocation Bonds. The refunding was completed to realize net present value savings related to the prior bonds. Principal payment will be due each February 1, commencing in February 2017. Interest will be payable semiannually on August 1 and February 1 each year. The bonds mature in 2036. The refunding resulted in an overall debt service savings of $5,035,708, and the net present value of the debt service savings, called an economic gain, amounted to $3,878,147. On January 27, 2016, the Successor Agency deposited $1,323,209 for the 2002 Tax Allocation Bonds in an irrevocable trust with an escrow agent to provide funds for the future debt service on the refunded bonds. The 2002 Tax Allocation Bonds were then paid in full from the escrow account on August 1, 2016. 137
60 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 16 — SUCCESSOR AGENCY (CONT'D)
As of June 30, 2023, the principal balance outstanding was $12,475,000. The future minimum payment obligation for the bonds payable at June 30, 2023, are as follows:

For the Year
Ended June 30 Principal Future Interest Total
2024 $ 860,000 $ 473,031 $ 1,333,031
2025 790,000 438,631 1,228,631
2026 740,000 407,031 1,147,031
2027 785,000 377,431 1,162,431
2028 1,165,000 346,031 1,511,031
2028 - 2032 3,255,000 885,725 4,140,725
2033 - 2036 4,880,000 337,762 5,217,762
Totals $ 12,475,000 $ 3,265,642 $ 15,740,642
Changes in Long-Term Liabilities
Long-term liability activity for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023, was as follows:

July 01,
2022
Additions/
(Deletions)
June 30,
2023
Due within One
Year
2016 Tax Allocation Bonds $ 13,375,000 $ (900,000) $ 12,475,000 $ 860,000 Add: Bond Premium 922,618 (67,923) 854,695 67,923
$ 14,297,618 $ (967,923) $ 13,329,695 $ 927,923
NOTE 17 — EXCESS EXPENDITURES OVER APPROPRIATIONS
Amount
General Fund:

Public work $ 11,098
Public safety $ 61,674
Supplemental Transactions and
Use Tax Fund:

Parks and recreation $ 79,015
Community development $ 3,116
Fire Fund:

Public safety $ 153,753
138
61 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 18 - RESTATEMENT
During the financial statement review, certain prior-year misstatements were identified and adjusted to ensure accurate financial reporting. The restatements, along with their reasons, are detailed below:

Internal Service Fund
In prior years, accumulated depreciation was understated, leading to an overstatement of net position by $26,681. This misstatement occurred due to depreciation expenses not being fully recorded. The adjustment corrects the net position to reflect the appropriate depreciation of assets.

General Fund
In prior years, deposit payable was understated, leading to an overstatement of fund balance by $164,252. This misstatement occurred due to deposit liabilities not being properly recorded.

Governmental Activities
The misstatements in the fund financial statements had a cumulative impact on governmental activities, resulting in an overstatement of net position by $1,697,185 .This includes $1,532,933 due to understated accumulated depreciation and $164,252 due to understated deposit payable.

Fiduciary Fund
In prior years, deferred revenue was overstated, leading to an understatement of net position by $735,491. This misstatement occurred because amounts classified as deferred revenue should have been recognized as revenue in prior periods.

These restatements have been made to reflect accurate financial data and ensure compliance with accounting standards.

Government -
Wide Activities
Government
al Activities
Internal
Service Fund
General
Fund
RDA
Successor
Agency
Admin Fund
Beginning net position, and fund
balance $ 60,217,516 $(4,794,708) $ 8,816,867 $ 4,517,023 Accumulated depreciation related to
capital assets (1,532,933) (26,681) - -
Deposit payable (164,252) - (164,252) -
Deferred revenue - - - 735,491
Beginning net position, and fund
balance - restated $ 58,520,331 $(4,821,389) $ 8,652,615 $ 5,252,514 139
62 CITY OF GREENFIELD

NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2023
NOTE 19 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Management evaluated subsequent events through March 4, 2025, which represents the date the financial statements were available for issuance, for events requiring recording or disclosure in the financial statements, and concluded that no subsequent event has occurred that requires disclosure in the notes to the financial statements.
140
63 REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
141

CITY OF GREENFIELD

SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES

BUDGET AND ACTUAL

GENERAL FUND
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
Budgeted Amounts Actual
Variance with
Final Budget
PositiveOriginal Final Amounts (Negative)
Revenues
Taxes and assessments $ 6,908,849 $ 7,054,849 $ 8,884,668 $ 1,829,819 Licenses and permits 543,500 545,500 340,218 (205,282)
Fines and penalties 1,800 4,800 6,010 1,210
Use of money and property 43,000 43,000 81,035 38,035
Intergovernmental revenues 46,471 2,472,215 1,083,156 (1,389,059) Charges for services 3,278,711 3,563,311 4,149,052 585,741 Other revenue 160,054 121,520 123,500 1,980
Total revenues 10,982,385 13,805,195 14,667,639 862,444 Expenditures
Current:

General government 4,241,948 4,430,958 4,101,596 329,362 Public work 197,748 242,898 253,996 (11,098)
Building and planning 1,336,753 1,427,909 1,227,806 200,103 Parks and recreation 677,632 680,874 526,742 154,132
Public safety 3,166,099 3,295,895 3,357,569 (61,674)
Streets and roads 490,043 496,397 356,354 140,043
Housing 132,847 1,053,147 766,488 286,659
Total expenditures 10,243,070 11,628,078 10,590,551 1,037,527 Excess/(deficiency) of revenues
over/(under) expenditures 739,315 2,177,117 4,077,088 1,899,971 Other Financing Sources/(Uses)
Interfund transfers
Transfers in 500,000 523,100 1,753,171 1,230,071
Transfers out (1,102,416) (2,328,160) (500,000) 1,828,160 Net financing sources/(uses) (602,416) (1,805,060) 1,253,171 3,058,231 Net change in fund balance 136,899 372,057 5,330,259 4,958,202 Fund balance - beginning of year 8,816,867 8,816,867 8,816,867 - Restatement - - (164,252) (164,252)
Fund balance - end of year $ 8,953,766 $ 9,188,924 $ 13,982,874 $ 4,793,950 142
64 CITY OF GREENFIELD

SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES

BUDGET AND ACTUAL

HOME GRANT SPECIAL REVENUE FUND
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
Budgeted Amounts Actual
Variance with
Final Budget
PositiveOriginal Final Amounts (Negative)
Revenues
Use of money and property $ - $ - $ 1,530 $ 1,530
Charges for services 50,000 50,000 27,700 (22,300)
Total revenues 50,000 50,000 29,230 (20,770)
Net change in fund balance 50,000 50,000 29,230 (20,770) Fund balance - beginning of year 179,476 179,476 179,476 - Fund balance - end of year $ 229,476 $ 229,476 $ 208,706 $ (20,770) 143
65 CITY OF GREENFIELD

SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES

BUDGET AND ACTUAL

TRAFFIC IMPACT FUND
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
Budgeted Amounts Actual
Variance with
Final Budget
PositiveOriginal Final Amounts (Negative)
Revenues
Use of money and property $ 52,000 $ 52,000 $ 34,869 $ (17,131) Charges for services 156,000 156,000 142,642 (13,358)
Total revenues 208,000 208,000 177,511 (30,489)
Other Financing Sources/(Uses)
Interfund transfers
Transfers out - (23,100) - 23,100
Net financing sources/(uses) - (23,100) - 23,100
Net change in fund balance 208,000 184,900 177,511 (7,389) Fund balance - beginning of year 4,635,753 4,635,753 4,635,753 - Fund balance - end of year $ 4,843,753 $ 4,820,653 $ 4,813,264 $ (7,389) 144
66 CITY OF GREENFIELD

SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES

BUDGET AND ACTUAL

GENERAL FACILITIES IMPACT FUND
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
Budgeted Amounts Actual
Variance with
Final Budget
PositiveOriginal Final Amounts (Negative)
Revenues
Use of money and property $ 78 $ 78 $ 847 $ 769
Charges for services 12,480 12,480 9,870 (2,610)
Total revenues 12,558 12,558 10,717 (1,841)
Net change in fund balance 12,558 12,558 10,717 (1,841) Fund balance - beginning of year (1,790,945) (1,790,945) (1,790,945) - Fund balance - end of year $ (1,778,387) $ (1,778,387) $ (1,780,228) $ (1,841) 145
67 CITY OF GREENFIELD

SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES

BUDGET AND ACTUAL

HOUSING FUND
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
Budgeted Amounts Actual
Variance with
Final Budget
PositiveOriginal Final Amounts (Negative)
Revenues
Use of money and property $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 2,245 $ 745 Charges for services - - 35,906 35,906
Total revenues 1,500 1,500 38,151 36,651
Net change in fund balance 1,500 1,500 38,151 36,651
Fund balance - beginning of year 1,227,113 1,227,113 1,227,113 - Fund balance - end of year $ 1,228,613 $ 1,228,613 $ 1,265,264 $ 36,651 146
68 CITY OF GREENFIELD

SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES

BUDGET AND ACTUAL

SUPPLEMENTAL TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX FUND
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
Budgeted Amounts Actual
Variance with
Final Budget
PositiveOriginal Final Amounts (Negative)
Revenues
Taxes and assessments $ 3,485,910 $ 3,485,910 $ 3,400,268 $ (85,642) Use of money and property - - 5,586 5,586
Total revenues 3,485,910 3,485,910 3,405,854 (80,056)
Expenditures
Current:

Parks and recreation 243,595 428,595 507,610 (79,015)
Community development 318,635 243,839 246,955 (3,116)
Public safety 3,415,375 3,288,728 2,712,901 575,827
Total expenditures 3,977,605 3,961,162 3,467,466 493,696 Net change in fund balances (491,695) (475,252) (61,612) 413,640 Fund balance - beginning of year 1,246,332 1,246,332 1,246,332 - Fund balance - end of year $ 754,637 $ 771,080 $ 1,184,720 $ 413,640 147
69 CITY OF GREENFIELD

SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES

BUDGET AND ACTUAL

AMERICAN RECOVERY ACT PLAN FUND
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
Budgeted Amounts Actual
Variance with
Final Budget
PositiveOriginal Final Amounts (Negative)
Revenues
Use of money and property $ - $ - $ 21,646 $ 21,646
Intergovernmental revenue - - 438,515 438,515
Total revenues - - 460,161 460,161
Expenditures
Capital Outlay - - - -
Total Expenditures - - - -
Excess/(deficiency) of revenues
over/(under) expenditures - - 460,161 (460,161)
Other Financing Sources/(Uses)
Interfund transfers
Transfers out - (1,250,000) (438,515) 811,485
Net financing sources/(uses) - (1,250,000) (438,515) 351,324 Net change in fund balance - (1,250,000) 21,646 1,271,646 Fund balance - beginning of year 2,086,053 2,086,053 2,086,053 - Fund balance - end of year $ 2,086,053 $ 836,053 $ 2,107,699 $ 1,271,646 148
70 CITY OF GREENFIELD

SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES

BUDGET AND ACTUAL

FIRE FUND
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
Budgeted Amounts Actual
Variance with
Final Budget
PositiveOriginal Final Amounts (Negative)
Revenues
Taxes and assessments $ 1,130,272 $ 1,130,272 $ 1,256,142 $ 125,870 Charges for service - - 7,940 7,940
Other revenue 1,082 51,082 112,461 61,379
Total revenues 1,131,354 1,181,354 1,376,543 195,189
Expenditures
Current:

Public safety 1,818,629 2,272,023 2,425,776 (153,753)
Total expenditures 1,818,629 2,272,023 2,425,776 (153,753) Excess/(deficiency) of revenues
over/(under) expenditures (687,275) (1,090,669) (1,049,233) 41,436 Other Financing Sources/(Uses)
Interfund transfers
Transfers in 500,000 500,000 500,000 -
Net financing sources/(uses) 500,000 500,000 500,000 -
Net change in fund balance (187,275) (590,669) (549,233) 41,436 Fund balance - beginning of year (2,525,168) (2,525,168) (2,525,168) - Fund balance - end of year $ (2,712,443) $ (3,115,837) $ (3,074,401) $ 41,436 149
71 CITY OF GREENFIELD

SCHEDULE OF PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF THE NET PENSION LIABILITY FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
June 30, 2023 June 30, 2022 June 30, 2021
Proportion of the net pension liability 0.05899% 0.05136% 0.05172% Proportionate share of the net pension liability $ 6,813,860 $ 2,777,607 $ 5,627,600 Covered payroll $ 6,339,241 $ 6,236,679 $ 5,686,703
Proportionate share of the net pension liability
as a percentage of its covered payroll 107.49% 44.54% 98.96% Plan's total pension liability $49,525,975,138 $46,174,942,264 $43,702,930,887 Plan's fiduciary net position $37,975,170,163 $40,766,653,876 $32,822,501,335 Plan fiduciary net position as a percentage of
the total pension liability 76.67% 88.29% 75.10%
Notes to Schedule:
1) There were no changes in assumptions or benefit terms for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. 2) Fiscal year 2015 was the 1st year of implementation, therefore only nine years are shown. 150
72 CITY OF GREENFIELD

SCHEDULE OF PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF THE NET PENSION LIABILITY FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
June 30, 2020 June 30, 2019 June 30, 2018
Proportion of the net pension liability 0.04927% 0.04705% 0.04690% Proportionate share of the net pension liability $ 5,048,823 $ 4,533,621 $ 4,651,302 Covered payroll $ 4,353,466 $ 3,518,990 $ 3,265,209
Proportionate share of the net pension liability
as a percentage of its covered payroll 115.97% 128.83% 142.45% Plan's total pension liability $41,426,453,489 $38,944,855,364 $37,161,348,322 Plan's fiduciary net position $31,179,414,067 $29,308,589,559 $27,244,095,376 Plan fiduciary net position as a percentage of
the total pension liability 75.26% 75.26% 73.31%
151
73 CITY OF GREENFIELD

SCHEDULE OF PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF THE NET PENSION LIABILITY FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
June 30, 2017 June 30, 2016 June 30, 2015
Proportion of the net pension liability 0.04679% 0.04668% 0.05027% Proportionate share of the net pension liability $ 4,048,963 $ 3,204,311 $ 3,128,406 Covered payroll $ 2,635,921 $ 2,393,628 $ 2,584,718
Proportionate share of the net pension liability
as a percentage of its covered payroll 153.61% 133.87% 121.03% Plan's total pension liability $33,358,627,624 $31,771,217,402 $30,829,966,631 Plan's fiduciary net position $24,705,532,291 $24,907,305,871 $24,607,502,515 Plan fiduciary net position as a percentage of
the total pension liability 74.06% 78.40% 79.82%
152
74 CITY OF GREENFIELD

SCHEDULE OF PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
June 30, 2023 June 30, 2022 June 30, 2021
Contractually required contribution (actuarially
determined) $ 1,257,340 $ 1,184,958 $ 1,129,272
Contributions in relation to the actuarially
determined contribution 1,257,340 1,184,958 1,129,272
Contribution deficiency (excess) $ - $ - $ -
Covered payroll $ 7,195,933 $ 6,339,241 $ 6,236,679
Contributions as a percentage of covered
payroll 17.47% 18.69% 18.11%
Notes to Schedule:
1) There were no changes in assumptions or benefit terms for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. 2) Fiscal year 2015 was the 1st year of implementation, therefore only nine years are shown. 153
75 CITY OF GREENFIELD

SCHEDULE OF PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
June 30, 2020 June 30, 2019 June 30, 2018
Contractually required contribution (actuarially
determined) $ 968,743 $ 708,616 $ 639,408
Contributions in relation to the actuarially
determined contribution 968,743 708,616 639,408
Contribution deficiency (excess) $ - $ - $ -
Covered payroll $ 5,686,703 $ 4,353,466 $ 3,518,990
Contributions as a percentage of covered
payroll 17.04% 16.28% 18.17%
154
76 CITY OF GREENFIELD

SCHEDULE OF PENSION CONTRIBUTIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
June 30, 2017 June 30, 2016 June 30, 2015
Contractually required contribution (actuarially
determined) $ 582,791 $ 515,413 $ 440,014
Contributions in relation to the actuarially
determined contribution 582,791 515,413 440,014
Contribution deficiency (excess) $ - $ - $ -
Covered payroll $ 3,265,209 $ 2,635,921 $ 2,393,628
Contributions as a percentage of covered
payroll 17.85% 19.55% 18.38%
155
77 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
156

CITY OF GREENFIELD

COMBINING BALANCE SHEET - NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
JUNE 30, 2023
Supplemental
Law
Enforcement
Service Fund
Police-Other
Grants Fund
Gas Tax
Fund
Park Impact
Fund
ASSETS
Cash and investment $ 101,708 $ 126,147 $ 2,650,076 $ 961,417 Accounts receivable 16,666 - 81,321 -
Interest receivable 13 - 12 22
Notes receivable - - - -
Prepaid expenses - - 127 -
Advances receivable - - - -
Total assets 118,387 126,147 2,731,536 961,439

LIABILITIES
Accounts payable 723 - 16,890 -
Accrued payroll - - - -
Due to other funds - - - -
Due to successor agency - - - -
Total liabilities 723 - 16,890 -

DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESORCES
Unavailable revenues - - - -
Unearned Revenue - - - -
Total deferred inflows of resources - - - -

FUND BALANCES
Nonspendable - - 127 -
Restricted 117,664 126,147 2,714,519 961,439
Unassigned - - - -
Total fund balances (deficits) 117,664 126,147 2,714,646 961,439 Total liabilities, deferred inflows of
resources and fund balances $ 118,387 $ 126,147 $ 2,731,536 $ 961,439 157
78 CITY OF GREENFIELD

COMBINING BALANCE SHEET - NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
JUNE 30, 2023
Police Impact
Fund
Sewer Impact
Fund
Community
Center Impact
Fund
Greenfield
Science
Workshop
ASSETS
Cash and investment $ 44,333 $ 1,172,650 $ 171,795 $ -
Accounts receivable - - - 100,841
Interest receivable - 36 5 5
Notes receivable - - - -
Prepaid expenses - - - -
Advances receivable - - - -
Total assets 44,333 1,172,686 171,800 100,846

LIABILITIES
Accounts payable - - - 36,966
Accrued payroll - - - 25,048
Due to other funds - - - 656,780
Due to successor agency - - - -
Total liabilities - - - 718,794

DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESORCES
Unavailable revenues - - - -
Unearned Revenue - - - -
Total deferred inflows of resources - - - -

FUND BALANCES
Nonspendable - - - -
Restricted 44,333 1,172,686 171,800 -
Unassigned - - - (617,948)
Total fund balances (deficits) 44,333 1,172,686 171,800 (617,948) Total liabilities, deferred inflows of
resources and fund balances $ 44,333 $ 1,172,686 $ 171,800 $ 100,846 -
158
79 CITY OF GREENFIELD

COMBINING BALANCE SHEET - NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
JUNE 30, 2023
Lexington
Square
Assessment
Fund
Terra Verde
Assessment
Fund SMD #1 Fund SMD #2 Fund
ASSETS
Cash and investment $ 297,202 $ 890,952 $ 438,554 $ 664,979 Accounts receivable - - - -
Interest receivable 13 33 17 16
Notes receivable - - - -
Prepaid expenses 90 310 - -
Advances receivable - - - -
Total assets 297,305 891,295 438,571 664,995

LIABILITIES
Accounts payable 2,872 17,254 1,033 1,033
Accrued payroll 1,275 1,548 1,275 (43)
Due to other funds - - - -
Due to successor agency - - - -
Total liabilities 4,147 18,802 2,308 990

DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESORCES
Unavailable revenues - - - -
Unearned Revenue - - - -
Total deferred inflows of resources - - - -

FUND BALANCES
Nonspendable 90 310 - -
Restricted 293,068 872,183 436,263 664,005
Unassigned - - - -
Total fund balances (deficits) 293,158 872,493 436,263 664,005 Total liabilities, deferred inflows of
resources and fund balances $ 297,305 $ 891,295 $ 438,571 $ 664,995 159
80 CITY OF GREENFIELD

COMBINING BALANCE SHEET - NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
JUNE 30, 2023
Vintage
Meadows
LLMD #3
Fund
Vintage
Meadows
SMD #3 Fund
Measure X
Fund CDBG Fund
ASSETS
Cash and investment $ 73,777 $ 70,910 $ 2,059,415 $ 853,232 Accounts receivable - - 176,523 -
Interest receivable - - - 2
Notes receivable - - - 48,600
Prepaid expenses - - - -
Advances receivable - - - -
Total assets 73,777 70,910 2,235,938 901,834

LIABILITIES
Accounts payable 600 200 - -
Accrued payroll - - - -
Due to other funds - - - -
Due to successor agency - - - -
Total liabilities 600 200 - -

DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESORCES
Unavailable revenues - - - 48,600
Unearned Revenue - - - -
Total deferred inflows of resources - - - 48,600

FUND BALANCES
Nonspendable - - - -
Restricted 73,177 70,710 2,235,938 853,234
Unassigned - - - -
Total fund balances (deficits) 73,177 70,710 2,235,938 853,234 Total liabilities, deferred inflows of
resources and fund balances $ 73,777 $ 70,910 $ 2,235,938 $ 901,834 160
81 CITY OF GREENFIELD

COMBINING BALANCE SHEET - NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
JUNE 30, 2023
Assets
Forfeiture/
Seizure Fund
Fire Impact
Fund
CSA - 74
Fund
Water Impact
Fund
ASSETS
Cash and investment $ 7,935 $ 76,841 $ 40,930 $ 4,354,531 Accounts receivable - 260 473 -
Interest receivable - 3 - 121
Notes receivable - - - -
Prepaid expenses - - - -
Advances receivable - - - -
Total assets 7,935 77,104 41,403 4,354,652

LIABILITIES
Accounts payable 7,434 - - -
Accrued payroll - - - -
Due to other funds - - - -
Due to successor agency - - - -
Total liabilities 7,434 - - -

DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESORCES
Unavailable revenues - - - -
Unearned Revenue - - - -
Total deferred inflows of resources - - - -

FUND BALANCES
Nonspendable - - - -
Restricted 501 77,104 41,403 4,354,652
Unassigned - - - -
Total fund balances (deficits) 501 77,104 41,403 4,354,652 Total liabilities, deferred inflows of
resources and fund balances $ 7,935 $ 77,104 $ 41,403 $ 4,354,652 161
82 CITY OF GREENFIELD

COMBINING BALANCE SHEET - NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
JUNE 30, 2023
Community
Outreach
Fund
Debt Service
Fund Total
ASSETS
Cash and investment $ 128,158 $ - $ 15,185,542
Accounts receivable 89,660 - 465,744
Interest receivable - - 298
Notes receivable - - 48,600
Prepaid expenses - - 527
Advances receivable - 1,379,815 1,379,815
Total assets 217,818 1,379,815 17,080,526

LIABILITIES
Accounts payable 19,745 - 104,750
Accrued payroll - - 29,103
Due to other funds 126,159 709,319 1,492,258
Due to successor agency - 890,758 890,758
Total liabilities 145,904 1,600,077 2,516,869

DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESORCES
Unavailable revenues - - 48,600
Unearned Revenue 25,366 - 25,366
Total deferred inflows of resources 25,366 - 73,966

FUND BALANCES
Nonspendable - 1,379,815 1,380,342
Restricted 46,548 - 15,327,374
Unassigned - (1,600,077) (2,218,025)
Total fund balances (deficits) 46,548 (220,262) 14,489,691 Total liabilities, deferred inflows of
resources and fund balances $ 217,818 $ 1,379,815 $ 17,080,526 162
83 CITY OF GREENFIELD

COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
Supplemental
Law
Enforcement
Service Fund
Police-Other
Grants Fund Gas Tax Fund
Park Impact
Fund

REVENUES
Taxes and assessments $ - $ - $ - $ -
Use of money and property 712 778 19,901 7,047
Intergovernmental revenues 165,272 20,000 882,074 34,345 Charges for services - - - -
Total revenues 165,984 20,778 901,975 41,392

EXPENDITURES
Current:

Public works - - - -
Parks and recreation - - - -
Community development - - - -
Public safety 93,967 - - -
Streets and roads - - 144,248 -
Debt services:

Principal - - - -
Interest - - - -
Total expenditures 93,967 - 144,248 -
Excess (deficiency) of revenue over (under)
expenditures 72,017 20,778 757,727 41,392

OTHER FINANCING SOURCES/(USES)
Transfers in - - - -
Transfer out (225,000) - (64,690) -
Net financing sources/Uses) (225,000) - (64,690) -
Net change in fund balances (152,983) 20,778 693,037 41,392 Fund balances - beginning of year 270,647 105,369 2,021,609 920,047 Fund balances - end of year $ 117,664 $ 126,147 $ 2,714,646 $ 961,439 163
84 CITY OF GREENFIELD

COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
Police Impact
Fund
Sewer Impact
Fund
Community
Center Impact
Fund
Greenfield
Science
Workshop

REVENUES
Taxes and assessments $ - $ - $ - $ -
Use of money and property 325 8,596 1,259 -
Intergovernmental revenues 13,871 157,719 3,157 408,530 Charges for services - - - -
Total revenues 14,196 166,315 4,416 408,530

EXPENDITURES
Current:

Public works - - - -
Parks and recreation - - - 743,972
Community development - - - -
Public safety - - - -
Streets and roads - - - -
Debt services:

Principal - - - -
Interest - - - -
Total expenditures - - - 743,972
Excess (deficiency) of revenue over (under)
expenditures 14,196 166,315 4,416 (335,442)

OTHER FINANCING SOURCES/(USES)
Transfers in - - - -
Transfer out - (1,250,000) - -
Net financing sources/Uses) - (1,250,000) - -
Net change in fund balances 14,196 (1,083,685) 4,416 (335,442) Fund balances - beginning of year 30,137 2,256,371 167,384 (282,506) Fund balances - end of year $ 44,333 $ 1,172,686 $ 171,800 $ (617,948) 164
85 CITY OF GREENFIELD

COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
Lexington
Square
Assessment
Fund
Terra Verde
Assessment
Fund SMD #1 Fund SMD #2 Fund

REVENUES
Taxes and assessments $ 105,079 $ 331,731 $ 38,598 $ 94,902 Use of money and property 3,145 7,690 3,224 4,946
Intergovernmental revenues - - - -
Charges for services - - - -
Total revenues 108,224 339,421 41,822 99,848

EXPENDITURES
Current:

Public works 76,784 281,458 33,748 33,786
Parks and recreation - - - -
Community development - - - -
Public safety - - - -
Streets and roads - - - -
Debt services:

Principal - - - -
Interest - - - -
Total expenditures 76,784 281,458 33,748 33,786
Excess (deficiency) of revenue over (under)
expenditures 31,440 57,963 8,074 66,062

OTHER FINANCING SOURCES/(USES)
Transfers in - - - -
Transfer out (131,841) (158,162) (1,294) (9,744)
Net financing sources/Uses) (131,841) (158,162) (1,294) (9,744) Net change in fund balances (100,401) (100,199) 6,780 56,318 Fund balances - beginning of year 393,559 972,692 429,483 607,687 Fund balances - end of year $ 293,158 $ 872,493 $ 436,263 $ 664,005 165
86 CITY OF GREENFIELD

COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
Vintage
Meadows
LLMD #3 Fund
Vintage
Meadows SMD
#3 Fund
Measure X
Fund CDBG Fund

REVENUES
Taxes and assessments $ 53,092 $ 48,739 $ - $ -
Use of money and property 585 564 16,657 6,254
Intergovernmental revenues - - 679,627 170,000
Charges for services - - - -
Total revenues 53,677 49,303 696,284 176,254

EXPENDITURES
Current:

Public works 3,350 800 - -
Parks and recreation - - - -
Community development - - - 169,846
Public safety - - - -
Streets and roads - - - -
Debt services:

Principal - - - -
Interest - - - -
Total expenditures 3,350 800 - 169,846
Excess (deficiency) of revenue over (under)
expenditures 50,327 48,503 696,284 6,408

OTHER FINANCING SOURCES/(USES)
Transfers in - - - -
Transfer out (6,086) (6,044) (156,678) -
Net financing sources/Uses) (6,086) (6,044) (156,678) - Net change in fund balances 44,241 42,459 539,606 6,408 Fund balances - beginning of year 28,936 28,251 1,696,332 846,826 Fund balances - end of year $ 73,177 $ 70,710 $ 2,235,938 $ 853,234 166
87 CITY OF GREENFIELD

COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
Asset
Forfeiture/
Seizure Fund
Fire Impact
Fund CSA - 74 Fund
Water Impact
Fund

REVENUES
Taxes and assessments $ - $ - $ - $ -
Use of money and property 58 563 300 31,919
Intergovernmental revenues - 260 13,267 -
Charges for services - - - 121,318
Total revenues 58 823 13,567 153,237

EXPENDITURES
Current:

Public works - - - -
Parks and recreation - - - -
Community development - - - -
Public safety - - - -
Streets and roads - - - -
Debt services:

Principal - - - -
Interest - - - -
Total expenditures - - - -
Excess (deficiency) of revenue over (under)
expenditures 58 823 13,567 153,237

OTHER FINANCING SOURCES/(USES)
Transfers in - - - -
Transfer out - - - -
Net financing sources/Uses) - - - -
Net change in fund balances 58 823 13,567 153,237
Fund balances - beginning of year 443 76,281 27,836 4,201,415 Fund balances - end of year $ 501 $ 77,104 $ 41,403 $ 4,354,652 167
88 CITY OF GREENFIELD

COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
Community
Outreach Fund
Debt Services
Fund Total

REVENUES
Taxes and assessments $ - $ - $ 672,141
Use of money and property 15 - 114,538
Intergovernmental revenues 348,101 - 2,896,223
Charges for services - - 121,318
Total revenues 348,116 - 3,804,220

EXPENDITURES
Current:

Public works - - 429,926
Parks and recreation - - 743,972
Community development - - 169,846
Public safety 223,223 - 317,190
Streets and roads - - 144,248
Debt services:

Principal - 701,487 701,487
Interest - 146,691 146,691
Total expenditures 223,223 848,178 2,653,360
Excess (deficiency) of revenue over (under)
expenditures 124,893 (848,178) 1,150,860

OTHER FINANCING SOURCES/(USES)
Transfers in - 287,486 287,486
Transfer out - - (2,009,539)
Net financing sources/Uses) - 287,486 (1,722,053)
Net change in fund balances 124,893 (560,692) (571,193) Fund balances - beginning of year (78,345) 340,430 15,060,884 Fund balances - end of year $ 46,548 $ (220,262) $ 14,489,691 168
89 CITY OF GREENFIELD

COMBINING STATEMENT OF FIDUCIARY NET POSITION

PRIVATE PURPOSE TRUST FUNDS
JUNE 30, 2023
RDA
Successor
Agency
Admin Fund
RDA
Successor
Agency Debt
Service Fund Total
ASSETS
Cash and investment $ 288,347 $ 6 $ 288,353
Interest receivable 37 - 37
Due from other fund 4,369,722 - 4,369,722
Due from the city of greenfield 890,758 - 890,758
Prepaid insurance - 109,603 109,603
Total assets 5,548,864 109,609 5,658,473

LIABILITIES
Accrued interest payable - 197,096 197,096
Unearned revenue - - -
Due to other funds - 4,369,722 4,369,722
Due within one year - 927,923 927,923
Due to more than one year - 12,401,772 12,401,772
Total liabilities - 17,896,513 17,896,513

DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
Deferred gain on refunding - 129,790 129,790
Total deferred inflows of resources - 129,790 129,790

NET POSITION
Restricted for:

Individuals, organizations, and other
governments 5,548,864 (17,916,694) (12,367,830)
Total liabilities, deferred inflows of
resources, and net position $ 5,548,864 $ 109,609 $ 5,658,473 169
90 CITY OF GREENFIELD

COMBINING STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FIDUCIARY NET POSITION

PRIVATE PURPOSE TRUST FUNDS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
RDA
Successor
Agency
Admin Fund
RDA
Successor
Agency Debt
Service Fund Total

ADDITIONS
Taxes $ 1,664,707 $ - $ 1,664,707
Investment earnings 40,674 1,409,032 1,449,706
Total additions 1,705,381 1,409,032 3,114,413

DEDUCTIONS
Other - 8,002 8,002
Interest expenses 1,409,031 424,504 1,833,535
Total deductions 1,409,031 432,506 1,841,537
Change in net position 296,350 976,526 1,272,876
Net position - beginning of year 4,517,023 (18,893,220) (14,376,197) Restatement 735,491 - 735,491
Net position - end of year $ 5,548,864 $(17,916,694) $(12,367,830) 170
91 COMPLIANCE SECTION
171

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL

STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS To the City Council
City of Greenfield
Greenfield, California
We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Greenfield (the "City"), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2023, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated March 4, 2025.

Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City’s internal control over financial reporting (internal control) as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control.

A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.

Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or, significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies may exist that were not identified. 172
92 Report on Compliance and Other Matters
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City’s financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the financial statements. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards.

Purpose of This Report
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the entity’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose.

San Diego, California
March 4, 2025
173
93 CITY OF GREENFIELD

SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND RESPONSES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
SECTION I - SUMMARY OF AUDITOR’S RESULTS
Financial Statements
Type of auditor’s report issued: Unmodified
Internal control over financial reporting:

Material weakness(es) identified? No
Significant deficiency(ies) identified that are not considered to be material weakness? None Reported
Noncompliance material to financial statements noted? No 174
94 CITY OF GREENFIELD

SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND RESPONSES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023

SECTION II - AUDIT FINDINGS IN RELATION TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS There are no findings related to the financial statements as of June 30, 2023. 175
95 CITY OF GREENFIELD

STATUS OF PRIOR YEAR'S AUDIT FINDINGS AND RESPONSES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023
There were no findings reported in prior year.
176
96 MEMORANDUM: March 6, 2025
AGENDA DATE: March 11, 2025
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jamie Tugel, Public Works Director

TITLE: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
GREENFEILD ADOPTING THE 2020 URBAN WATER

MANAGEMENT PLAN (UWMP)

BACKGROUND
The Urban Water Management Act (Act) became a part of the State Water Code with the passage of Assembly Bill 797 during the 1983-1984 regular session of the California Legislature. The Act applied to every urban water supplier that provides water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplies more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually.

The City of Greenfield provides water for municipal purposes to more than 3,000 customers and is, therefore, subject to the Act.

The Act has been modified over the years in response to the State’s water shortages, droughts, and other factors. A significant amendment was made in 2009, following the drought of 2007-2009 as well as the Governor’s call for a statewide 20% reduction in urban water use by the year 2020.

This was the Water Conservation Act of 2009, also known as SB X7-7. This Act requires agencies to establish water use targets for 2015 and 2020 that will support statewide urban water consumption savings of 20% by December 31, 2020. SB X7-7 required each water agency preparing an Urban Water Management Plan to calculate baseline water use as an interim (2015) and final (2020) water use reduction target.

Under the Act, an Urban Water Management Plan must be adopted by the governing board of each system and submitted to the Department of Water Resources. The UWMP must be updated every 5 years, years ending in 0 and 5. For example, the 2025 UWMP is due July 1, 2026. These plans support the suppliers’ long-term resource planning to ensure that adequate water supplies are available to meeting existing and future water needs.

The attached 2020 Urban Water Management Plan was prepared following the requirements of the Urban Water Management Act SB X7-7, and plan preparation guidelines issued by the California Department of Water Resources. The 2020 UWMP indicates that the City’s actual daily per capita City Council Memorandum 599 El Camino Real Greenfield CA 93937 831-674-5591 www.ci.greenfield.ca.us
177
water use was 90 gallons per capita per day (GPCD). As established by the tables and procedures prepared by the Department of Water Resources, the City’s 2025 target goal is 126 GPCD. The interim goal for 2020 is 106 GPCD. With a 2020 actual consumption of 90 GPCD, the City has met its interim 2020 target.

REVIEW AND ANALYSIS
The 2020 Urban Water Management Plan update was not completed by the City by the due date of July 1, 2021. The 2020 UWMP is quite past due and needed to be completed whether or not the deadline was met. Adopting the 2020 UWMP will close the gap on the State requirements, assist the City in obtaining funding for the new Wastewater Treatment Plant, and guide staff into the 2025 UWMP update, which is due July 1, 2026.

BUDGET AND FINALCIAL IMPACT
Adoption of the 2020 Urban Water Management Plan has no direct impact on the City’s budget.

The Urban Water Management Plan does not require the City implement any new water conservation or management programs that are not already implemented or in place in the event of a future water shortage.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan by Resolution.

PROPOSED MOTION
I MOVE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2025-16, A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN.
178
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-16

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENFEILD ADOPTING THE 2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
WHEREAS, the California Urban Water Management Planning at, Water Code Section 10610 et seq., mandates that every urban water supplier providing water for municipal purposes to more than 3,000 customers annually, must prepare an Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), the primary objective of which is to plan for the conservation and efficient use of water; and WHEREAS, the UWMP must be adopted by the governing board of each system and submitted to the California Department of Water Resources; and WHEREAS, the associated 2020 Water Shortage Contingency Plan was adopted by City Council on March 22, 2022 ; and
WHEREAS, the State Water Code required the UWMP be updated once every 5 years (beginning in 2010), and the City shall make any amendments of changes to its UWMP which are indicated by such review and update; and
WHEREAS, the City has prepared and circulated for public review a draft 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, properly noticed a public hearing regarding the 2020 UWMP for March 11, 2025; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield that:

1. The 2020 Urban Waer Management Plan is hereby adopted; and

2. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to submit the 2020 Urban Water Management Plan to the California Department of Water Resources within 30 days of this date.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Greenfield, at a regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council held on the 11th day of March 2025, by the following vote:

AYES, and all in favor, therefore, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

_______________________________
Robert White, Mayor
Attest:

__________________________
Ann F. Rathbun, City Clerk
179
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water
Management Plan Update
(updated January 17, 2025)
Prepared by: City of Greenfield in conjunction with
Wallace Group
180
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan

TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND LAY DESCRIPTION .............................................................................. 1-1

1.1 Urban Water Management Plan.................................................................................................................... 1-1

1.2 Water Conservation Bill of 2009 .................................................................................................................. 1-1

1.3 Urban Water Management Plans in relation to other planning efforts ......................................................... 1-1

1.4 Urban Water Management Plan Organization.............................................................................................. 1-2

1.5 UWMP and Grant or Loan Eligibility .......................................................................................................... 1-2 CHAPTER 2 PLAN PREPARATION ................................................................................................................... 2-1

2.1 Basis for Preparing a Plan............................................................................................................................. 2-1

2.2 Public Water Systems.................................................................................................................................. 2-1

2.2.1. Agencies Serving Multiple Service Areas/Public Water Systems ..................................................... 2-2

2.3 Individual or Regional Planning ................................................................................................................... 2-2

2.4 Fiscal or Calendar Year and Units of Measure............................................................................................. 2-3

2.5 Coordination and Outreach........................................................................................................................... 2-3

2.6 Coordination with Other Agencies and the Community............................................................................... 2-4

2.7 Notice to Cities and Counties ....................................................................................................................... 2-4 CHAPTER 3 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................... 3-1

3.1 Service Area Physical Description................................................................................................................ 3-1

3.2. Service Area Map ........................................................................................................................................ 3-3

3.3 Service Area Climate .................................................................................................................................... 3-3

3.3.1 Rainfall................................................................................................................................................ 3-5

3.3.2 Wind.................................................................................................................................................... 3-6

3.4 Service Area Population ............................................................................................................................... 3-7

3.5 Land Uses within Service Area..................................................................................................................... 3-8

3.5.1 Future Development............................................................................................................................ 3-8 CHAPTER 4 System Water Use ............................................................................................................................ 4-1

4.1 WATER USE BY TYPE – POTABLE 2020 ............................................................................................... 4-1

4.2 WATER USE BY SECTOR – PROJECTED............................................................................................... 4-2

4.3 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM WATER LOSS................................................................................................ 4-4

4.4 FUTURE WATER SAVINGS IN PROJECTED WATER USE. ................................................................ 4-5

4.5 WATER USE BY LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN USE PROJECTIONS..................................... 4-5

4.6 CHARACTERISTIC FIVE-YEAR WATER USE ...................................................................................... 4-6

4.7 CLIMATE CHANGE CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................................................... 4-7 CHAPTER 5 SB X7-7 BASELINE AND TARGETS ........................................................................................... 5-1

5.1 Updating Calculations From 2015 UWMP................................................................................................... 5-1

5.2 Establishing Baselines And Targets.............................................................................................................. 5-2

5.3 Service Area Population ............................................................................................................................... 5-2

5.4 Baseline Periods, Baseline GPCD, And Confirmed SB X7-7 2020 Targets................................................ 5-3

5.5 Demonstration of Compliance with SB X7-7 2020 Target........................................................................... 5-3 CHAPTER 6 Water Supply Characterization......................................................................................................... 6-1

6.1 Purchased Water ........................................................................................................................................... 6-2

6.2 Groundwater ................................................................................................................................................. 6-2

6.2.1 Basin description................................................................................................................................. 6-3

6.2.2 Historic Groundwater Pumping past five Years.................................................................................. 6-4

6.3 Surface Water ............................................................................................................................................... 6-6

6.4 Stormwater.................................................................................................................................................... 6-6

6.5 Wastewater and Recycled Water .................................................................................................................. 6-6

6.5.1 Recycled Water System and Recycled Water Beneficial Uses........................................................... 6-9

6.6 Desalinated Water Opportunities................................................................................................................ 6-10

6.7 Exchanges or Transfer ................................................................................................................................ 6-10

6.8 Future Water Projects ................................................................................................................................. 6-10

6.8.1 Supply Recommendations................................................................................................................. 6-11

6.8.2 Storage Recommendations................................................................................................................ 6-11 181
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan

6.8.3 Other Major Capital Improvement Projects...................................................................................... 6-12

6.8.4 Water Supply..................................................................................................................................... 6-12

6.8.5 Water Booster Stations...................................................................................................................... 6-12

6.8.6 Water Meters and Water Services..................................................................................................... 6-12

6.9 Summary of Existing and Planned Sources of Water................................................................................. 6-13

6.10 Climate Change Effects............................................................................................................................ 6-16

6.11 Energy Intensity........................................................................................................................................ 6-17 CHAPTER 7 Water Supply Reliability Assessment .............................................................................................. 7-1 Section 7.1 Constraints on Water Sources.......................................................................................................... 7-1

7.1.1 Supply Availability ............................................................................................................................. 7-2

7.2 Reliability by Type of Year .......................................................................................................................... 7-3

7.3 Supply and Demand Assessment.................................................................................................................. 7-4

7.4 Water Supply Management Tools and Options............................................................................................ 7-6

7.5 Drought Risk Assessment............................................................................................................................. 7-7 CHAPTER 8 WATER SHORTAGE CONTINGENCY PLANNING .................................................................. 8-1

8.1 Water Supply Reliability Analysis................................................................................................................ 8-1

8.2 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment Procedures........................................................................ 8-2

8.4 Shortage Response Actions........................................................................................................................... 8-6

8.4.1 Supply Augmentation.......................................................................................................................... 8-6

8.4.2 Demand Reduction.............................................................................................................................. 8-6

8.4.3 Operational Changes........................................................................................................................ 8-6

8.4.4 Additional Mandatory Restrictions................................................................................................... 8-14

8.5 Emergency Response Plan.......................................................................................................................... 8-15

8.6 Seismic Risk Assessment and Mitigation Plan........................................................................................... 8-15

8.7 Communication Protocols........................................................................................................................... 8-15

8.8 Compliance and Enforcement.................................................................................................................... 8-15

8.9 Legal Authorities........................................................................................................................................ 8-16 CHAPTER 9 DEMAND MANAGEMENT MEASURES..................................................................................... 9-1

9.1 Demand Management Measures for Wholesale Suppliers........................................................................... 9-1

9.2 Demand Management Measures for Retail Suppliers................................................................................... 9-1

9.2.1 Water Waste Prevention Ordinances................................................................................................... 9-2

9.2.2 Metering .............................................................................................................................................. 9-2

9.2.3 Conservation Pricing........................................................................................................................... 9-2

9.2.4 Public Education and Outreach ........................................................................................................... 9-3

9.2.5 Programs to Assess and Manage Distribution System Real Loss....................................................... 9-3

9.2.6 Water Conservation Program Coordination and Staffing Support..................................................... 9-4

9.2.7 Other DMMs....................................................................................................................................... 9-4

9.3 Planned Implementation to Achieve Water Use Targets.............................................................................. 9-4

9.3.1 Implementation Over the Past Five Years........................................................................................... 9-4

9.4 Water Use Objectives (Future Requirements) .............................................................................................. 9-4 CHAPTER 10 Plan adoption, submittal, and implementation ............................................................................. 10-1

10.1 Inclusion of All 2020 Data........................................................................................................................ 10-1

10.2 Notice of Public Hearing .......................................................................................................................... 10-1

10.2.1 Notice to City and County Agencies ..................................................................................................... 10-1

10.2.2 Notice to the Public ......................................................................................................................... 10-2

10.3 Public Hearing and Adoption.................................................................................................................... 10-2

10.4 Plan Submittal........................................................................................................................................... 10-3

10.5 Public Availability .................................................................................................................................... 10-3

10.6 Amending the UWMP or WSCP.............................................................................................................. 10-3 182
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 3-1 City of Greenfield Aerial Map.............................................................................................................. 3-2 Figure 3-1A Service Area Boundary Map.............................................................................................................. 3-4 Figure 3-2 Average High and Low Temperatures.................................................................................................. 3-5 Figure 3-3 Average Monthly Rainfall ................................................................................................................... 3-6 Figure 3-4 Average Wind Speed ............................................................................................................................ 3-7 Figure 3-5 Greenfield Development Map............................................................................................................... 3-9 Figure 6-1 Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin Map............................................................................................... 6-3 Figure 6-2 Existing Groundwater Well Locations.................................................................................................. 6-5 Figure 6-3 WWTP .................................................................................................................................................. 6-7 Figure 6-4 Groundwater Extraction Form – Data Summary ................................................................................ 6-14

LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1: Public Water System............................................................................................................................. 2-2 Table 2-2 Plan Identification .................................................................................................................................. 2-2 Table 2-3 Agency Identification............................................................................................................................. 2-3 Table 2-4: Water Supplier Information Exchange.................................................................................................. 2-4 Table 3-1: Population - Current and Projected (AMBAG)..................................................................................... 3-8 Table 3-2: Population - Current and Projected (AMBAG Plus Recent Annexations)............................................ 3-8 Table 3-3 Land Use Designations and Projections Within City Limits................................................................ 3-10 Table 3-4 Summary of Future/Pending Developments, City of Greenfield ......................................................... 3-11 Table 3-5 Cannabis Facilites in Greenfield – Existing and Proposed .................................................................. 3-12 Table 4-1 Demand for Potable Water – 2020 Actual ............................................................................................ 4-2 Table 4-2 Projected Number of total connections by used Type............................................................................ 4-2 Table 4-3 Demands for Potable Water- Projections (Standard Table 4.2) in Acre/Feet......................................... 4-3 Table 4-4 Total Water Demand (Standard Table 4.3) ............................................................................................ 4-3 Table 4-6 Inclusion in Water Use Projections (Required DWR Table 4-5)........................................................... 4-5 Table 4-7 Unconstrained Water Project for Next Five Years................................................................................. 4-7 Table 5-1 Method for Population Estimates (SB X7-7 Table 2) ............................................................................ 5-3 Table 5-2. Service Area Population (SB X&-7 table 3) ......................................................................................... 5-3 Table 5-3 SB X&_& baseline and targets summary (DWR TABLE 5-1).............................................................. 5-3 Table 5-4 SB X7-7 2020 Compliance (DWR TABLE 5-2) .................................................................................. 5-3 Table 6-1 Groundwater Pumped Past five years..................................................................................................... 6-6 TABLE 6-2: Wastewater Collection Within the service area in 2020 (WDR Table 6-2) ...................................... 6-8 TABLE 6-3: Wastewater Treatment and Discharge within Service Area in 2020................................................. 6-9 Table 6-4: Current and Projected Recycled Water Direct Beneficial Uses Within Service Area .......................... 6-9 Table 6-5: Wholesale: 2020 UWMP Recycled Water Use Projection Compared to 2015 Actual....................... 6-10 Table 6-6: Methods to Expand Future Recycled Water Use ................................................................................ 6-10 Table 6-7: Expected Future Water Supply Projects or Program........................................................................... 6-11 Table 6-8: Water Supplies.................................................................................................................................... 6-13 Table 6-9 Recommended Energy Intensity .......................................................................................................... 6-18 Table 7-1 Bases of water Year Data ....................................................................................................................... 7-3 Table 7-2 Total Inches of Rain per Year ................................................................................................................ 7-4 Table 7-3 Normal Year Supply and Demand Comparison..................................................................................... 7-5 Table 7-4 Single Dry Year Supply and Demand Comparison................................................................................ 7-5 Table 7-5 Multiple Year Supply and Demand Comparisona.................................................................................. 7-6 Submittal Table 7-6: Five-Year Drought Risk Assessment Tables to address Water Code Section 10635(b) ...... 7-8 Table 8-2: Cross walk from the 2014 Plan to New 2020 DWR Six Stages............................................................ 8-4 Table 8-3: Stages of Water Shortage Contingency Plan......................................................................................... 8-5 Table 10-1 Notification of Cities and Counties.................................................................................................... 10-2 183
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A – Outreach Letters and Notices
Appendix B – SB X7-7 Forms
Appendix C – California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment, Central Coast Region Report Appendix D – Water Shortage Contingency Plan
Appendix E – Water Rates
Appendix F – Resolution of Adoption
184
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
AB Assembly Bill
AF Acre-feet, Acre-foot
AMBAG Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments
ASGSA Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency
AWSAR Annual Water Shortage Assessment Report
BMP Best Management Practice
CWC California Water Code
DDW (California) Division of Drinking Water
DOF Department of Finance
DMM Demand Management Measure
DWR Department of Water Resources
ERP Emergency Response Plan
GIS Geographic Information System
GPCD gallons per capita per day
GPM Gallons per minute
GSA Groundwater Sustainability Agency
GSP Groundwater Sustainability Plan
JPA Joint Powers Authority
LAFCO Local Agency Formation Commission
MCWRA Monterey County Water Resources Agency
MG Million Gallons
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
PWS Public Water System
PWSID Public Water System Identification Number
SB Senate Bill
SVBGSA Salinas Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency SVGB Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin
SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
SCSMP Sewer Collection System Master Plan
SFR Single-Family Residential
SGMA Sustainable Groundwater Management Act
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board
UWMP Urban Water Management Plan
WAC Water Awareness Committee (of Monterey County)
WDR Waste Discharge Requirement(s)
WMP Water Master Plan
WSCP Water Shortage Contingency Plan
WWTP Wastewater Treatment Plant
185
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 1-1
CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION AND LAY DESCRIPTION

1.1 Urban Water Management Plan
The Urban Water Management Act (Act) became part of the water code with the passage of Assembly Bill 797 during the 1983- 1984 regular session of the California Legislature. The Act requires every urban water supplier that provides water for municipal purpose either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplies more than 3,000 Acre-feet of water annually. Under this Act, the Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) must be adopted by the governing board of each system and submitted to the California Department of Resources (DWR).

The UWMP Act has been modified over the years in response to the State’s water shortages, droughts, and other factors. A significant amendment was made in 2009, after the drought of 2007-2009 and because of the governor’s call for a statewide 20 percent reduction in urban water use by the year 2020.

This was the Water Conservation Act of 2009, also known as SB X7-7. This Act required agencies to establish water use targets for 2015 and 2020 that would result in statewide savings of 20 percent by 2020.

1.2 Water Conservation Bill of 2009
On November 10, 2009, the state legislature passed the Water Conservation Bill of 2009 (also referred to as Senate Bill (SB) X7-7) as a water conservation component to the Delta legislative package. The bill seeks a 20 percent statewide reduction in urban per capita water use in California by December 31, 2020.

SB X7-7 requires that each retail agency preparing a 2010 UWMP to calculate baseline water use as well as an interim (for 2015) and final (for 2020) water use reduction target.

1.3 Urban Water Management Plans in relation to other planning efforts To help combat the overdraft of the Salinas Valley Ground Basin, the City has joined the Water Awareness Committee of Monterey County (WAC). Through the WAC, representatives from several agencies throughout Monterey County work together to coordinate water conservation events and other water awareness efforts, including educational programs and special events to educate the public of Monterey County water challenges moving forward into the future.

Other City planning efforts described below have been updated to present-day (January 2025) status, given that this 2020 UWMP is being completed post-2020.

The City also prepared and/or updated three master plans: Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Master Plan, Sewer Collection System Master Plan (SCSMP) and the Potable Water Distribution Master Plan (WMP). These documents are summarized as follows:
186
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 1-2
• WWTP Master Plan, May 2021, prepared by Carollo Engineers. Significance to UWMP:
evaluated/considered using tertiary recycled water for irrigation (in lieu of potable water). • SCSMP, May 2021, prepared by Wallace Group. Significance to UWMP: Defines 2020 demographic information including population projections, land use changes and anticipated development (and thus urban water demands), projected wastewater flows to WWTP (potential wastewater flows available for treatment to process tertiary recycled water). • WMP, May 2021, prepared by Wallace Group. Defines 2020 demographic information including population projections, land use changes and anticipated development (and thus urban water demands), evaluation of City’s water system assets including pumping stations, municipal wells and water storage tanks, water system reliability.

The City has implemented new tiered water rates (adopted July 2023) that promote and encourage water conservation efforts.

The City also completed a major replacement of its old Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system with a new state-of-the-art SCADA system. Part of this SCADA upgrade included replacing or refurbishing all 8 water meters that meter water use from the City’s booster pump stations.

Some of these meters were over 20 years old. Also included in this SCADA modernization included the installation of three new meters at the City’s 3 water supply wells to ensure more accurate readings of pumped well water supplies to the City.

1.4 Urban Water Management Plan Organization
This UWMP was prepared based on the recommendations presented in the Department of Water Resource (DWR) 2020 UWMP Guidebook.

Chapter 1 – UWMP Introduction and Lay Description
Chapter 2 – Plan Preparation
Chapter3 – System Description
Chapter 4 – Water Use Characterization
Chapter 5 – Baseline and Target Compliance
Chapter 6 - Water Supply Characterization
Chapter 7 – Water Service Reliability and Drought Risk Assessment Chapter 8 – Water Shortage Contingency Plan
Chapter 9 – Demand Management Measures
Chapter 10 – Plan Adoption, Submittal, and Implementation Appendices

1.5 UWMP and Grant or Loan Eligibility
For a Supplier to be eligible for any water grant or loan administered by DWR, the Supplier must have a current UWMP on file that has been determined by DWR to address the requirements of the Water Code. 187
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 1-3
A current UWMP must also be maintained by the Supplier throughout the term of any grant or loan administered by DWR.

Water Code Section 10608.56
(a) On and after July 1, 2016, an urban retail water supplier is not eligible for a water grant or loan awarded or administered by the state unless the supplier complies with this part. (c) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the department shall determine that an urban retail water supplier is eligible for a water grant or loan even though the supplier has not met the per capita reductions required pursuant to Section 10608.24, if the urban retail water supplier has submitted to the department for approval a schedule, financing plan, and budget, to be included in the grant or loan agreement, for achieving the per capita reductions. The supplier may request grant or loan funds to achieve the per capita reductions to the extent the request is consistent with the eligibility requirements applicable to the water funds. (e) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the department shall determine that an urban retail water supplier is eligible for a water grant or loan even though the supplier has not met the per capita reductions required pursuant to Section 10608.24, if the urban retail water supplier has submitted to the department for approval documentation demonstrating that its entire service area qualifies as a disadvantaged community.
(f) The department shall not deny eligibility to an urban retail water supplier or agricultural water supplier in compliance with the requirements of this part and Part 2.8 (commencing with Section 10800), that is participating in a multiagency water project, or an integrated regional water management plan, developed pursuant to Section 75026 of the Public Resources Code, solely on the basis that one or more of the agencies participating in the project or plan is not implementing all of the requirements of this part or Part 2.8 (commencing with Section 10800).

Water Code Section 10656
An urban water supplier is not eligible for a water grant or loan awarded or administered by the state unless the urban water supplier complies with this part.

California Code of Regulations Section 596.1 (b)(2)
“disadvantaged community” means a community with a median household income that is less than 80 percent of the statewide annual median household income. 188
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 2-1
CHAPTER 2

PLAN PREPARATION
This chapter provides information on the City’s process for developing the 2020 UWMP, including efforts in coordination and outreach with other agencies in the region.

2.1 Basis for Preparing a Plan
Water Code Section 10617
“Urban water supplier" means a supplier, either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. An urban water supplier includes a supplier or contractor for water, regardless of the basis of right, which distributes or sells for ultimate resale to customers. This part applies only to water supplied from public water systems… Water Code Section 10620 (b)
Every person that becomes an urban water supplier shall adopt an urban water management plan within one year after it has become an urban water supplier.

Water Code Section 10621
(a) Each urban water supplier shall update its plan at least once every five years on or before July 1, in years ending in six and one, incorporating updated and new information from the five years preceding each update.

The City of Greenfield supplies water to over 3,000 service connections, and therefore as defined in the Water Code, the City is an urban water supplier. The City of Greenfield is required to prepare an Urban Water Management Plan every five years, in years ending in 00 and 05.

2.2 Public Water Systems
Water Code Section 10644
(a)(2) The plan, or amendments to the plan, submitted to the department … shall include any standardized forms, tables, or displays specified by the department.

California Health and Safety Code 116275 (h)
“Public Water System” means a system for the provision of water for human consumption through pipes or other constructed conveyances that has 15 or more service connections or regularly serves at least 25 individuals daily at least 60 days out of the year.

The City of Greenfield owns, operates and maintains a potable water system that provides drinking water for human consumption, and water for fire protection, and has a unique Public Water System Identification Number (PWSID). This potable water system is permitted by the California Division of Drinking Water 189
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 2-2
(DDW), with a corresponding PWSID of CA2710008. In accordance with DDW permit requirements, and Section 116530 of the Health and Safety Code, the City prepares and submits annual reports to DDW.

2.2.1. Agencies Serving Multiple Service Areas/Public Water Systems The City of Greenfield serves as its own public water system (PWS), and serves only six customers outside City limits via an Out of Area Service Agreement. Information about that PWS is shown below in Table 2‐1.

Table 2-1: Public Water System
Public
Water
System
Number
Public
Water
System
Name
Number of
Municipal
Connections
2020
Volume
of Water
Supplied
2020
(AF)
CA2710008 City of
Greenfield 3772 1921.7
TOTAL 3772 1921.7

2.3 Individual or Regional Planning
The City of Greenfield is not part of any regional alliance, therefore this 2020 UWMP is prepared as an individual UWMP (Table 2-2).

Table 2-2 Plan Identification
Select
Only
One
Type of Plan
Name of
RUWMP or
regional
Alliance (if
applicable)
( X ) Individual UWMP
( )
Water Supplier is
also a member of
a RUWMP
( )
Water Supplier is
also a Member of
a Regional
Alliance
( ) Regional Urban Water Management
Plan (RUWMP)
190
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 2-3

2.4 Fiscal or Calendar Year and Units of Measure
Water Code Section 1608.20
(a)(1) Urban retail water suppliers…may determine the targets on a fiscal year or calendar year basis
Information provided for the UWMP in this report is on a calendar year basis, and water volumes are presented in units of acre-feet (AF) as summarized in Table 2-3. Water use and planning data reported in this UWMP for calendar year 2020 cover the full twelve months of the year, as required by the UWMP Guidelines.

Table 2-3 Agency Identification
Type of Agency (select one or both)
( ) Agency is a wholesaler
(X) Agency is a retailer
Fiscal or Calendar Year (select one)
(X) UWMP Tables are in Calendar Years
( ) UWMP Tables are in Fiscal Years
Unites of Measure used in UWMP
Unit Acre-feet (AF)

2.5 Coordination and Outreach
Water Code Section 10620
(d)(2) Each urban water supplier shall coordinate the preparation of its plan with other appropriate agencies in the area, including other water suppliers that share a common source, water management agencies, and relevant public agencies, to the extent practicable.

Water Code Section 10631
(a) A plan shall be adopted in accordance with this chapter that shall do all of the following: Urban water suppliers shall coordinate with local or regional land use authorities to determine the most appropriate land use information, including, where appropriate, land use information obtained from local or regional land use authorities, as developed pursuant to Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code.

The City made the draft plan available to the public in electronic form only. The City also provided opportunities for the public to review the UWMP update process, provide input and comments on the draft UWMP, and participate in the public hearing. Refer to Chapter 10 of this UWMP for further details on the public review process.
191
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 2-4
The City did not notify any wholesale supplier (Table 2-4) as it serves as its own water supplier.

Table 2-4: Water Supplier Information Exchange
The retail supplier has informed the following wholesale supplier(s) of projected water use in accordance with California Water Code (CWC) 10631.

No wholesale water supplier needed to be informed.

2.6 Coordination with Other Agencies and the Community
Water Code Section 10642
Each urban water supplier shall encourage the active involvement of diverse social, cultural, and economic elements of the population within the service area prior to and during the preparation of both the plan and the water shortage contingency plan.

Prior to adopting either, the urban water supplier shall make both the plan and the water shortage contingency plan available for public inspection and shall hold a public hearing or hearings thereon...

The City of Greenfield 2020 UWMP is an update to the 2015 UWMP, and the City has submitted its draft 2020 UWMP to regional stakeholders. The following is a list of agencies and organizations that the City has contacted in the preparation of this 2020 UWMP:
• The California State Division of Drinking Water (DDW) • Monterey County Water Resources Agency (MCWRA)
• Arroyo Seco GW Sustainability Agency
• California Water Service - King City Branch
• Clark Colony Water
• City of Soledad

2.7 Notice to Cities and Counties
Water Code 10621 (b)
Every urban water supplier required to prepare a plan pursuant to this part shall, at least 60 days before the public hearing on the plan required by Section 10642, notify any city or county within which the supplier provides water supplies that the urban water supplier will be reviewing the plan and considering amendments or changes to the plan
Agencies must notify Cities and Counties within the area which they serve water that the UWMP is being updated and reviewed. Since water supplied by the City of Greenfield is within the Monterey County boundaries the previously mentioned agencies were notified or invited to participate in the process.

Copies of the letters sent to each of those agencies are included in Appendix A. 192
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 3-1
CHAPTER 3

SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

3.1 Service Area Physical Description
Water Code Section 10631
(a) Describe the service area of the supplier, including current and projected population, climate, and other social, economic, and demographic factors affecting the supplier’s water management planning. The projected population estimates shall be based upon data from the state, regional, or local service agency population projections within the service area of the urban water supplier and shall be in five-year increments to 20 years or as far as data is available. The description shall include the current and projected land uses within the existing or anticipated service area affecting the supplier’s water management planning. Urban water suppliers shall coordinate with local or regional land use authorities to determine the most appropriate land use information, including, where appropriate, land use information obtained from local or regional land use authorities, as developed pursuant to Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code.

John S. Clarke and other promoters laid out the grounds for the town from 1902 to 1905. The California Home Extension Association, founded by John S. Clark, purchased 4,000 acres (1,600ha) of land that had been part of Rancho Arroyo Seco, a Mexican land grant deeded to Joaquín de la Torre in 1840. The land was put up for sale at a public drawing in Los Angeles in 1905. Buyers could purchase an acre with water rights for about $37.50. A purchase of 2.5 acres came with an added benefit — a lot in town.ͣ In addition to the acreage, Clark received the water rights to the land. He formed The Clark Colony Water Company, which became the organization for water distribution and filled the city with water from the nearby Arroyo Seco River. The organized water canal system and ideal growing conditions attracted people of Danish, Swiss and other nationalities from surrounding areas to settle in this new colony. In the 1930s, wells were dug to supplement water being drawn from the river, which created a year-round water supply.ᵇ
In 1906, the district purchased a lot from Edward Greenfield along with two other lots adjacent to the Arroyo Seco Development Company. Clark Colony evolved into Clark City and was eventually renamed Greenfield, in honor of Mr. Greenfield., after the United States Postal Service informed the City that there were too many "Clark Cities" in the state. Greenfield was recognized as a municipality by the State legislature and incorporated on January 7, 1947. ͨ
The City of Greenfield is located in the heart of the Salinas Valley, Surrounded by the Gabilan mountains range to the east and the Santa Lucia Mountains range to the west. Greenfield is, approximately 95 miles south of San Jose and 60 miles north of Paso Robles. According to the United States Census Bureau, the City has a total area of 2.1 square miles (5.4 km2), all of it land (Figure 3-1).ͩ A,b,c,d “ Greenfield, California” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenfield,_California#cite_ref-1 193
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 3-2
194
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 3-3

3.2. Service Area Map
A Service Area Map is included as Figure 3-2. The City serves customers within the City limits shown on this map. This service area boundary map also shows the current land use and zoning within City limits, and including recently annexed lands to the City. Within the existing City limits, there are no other changes to land use/zoning anticipated; however, the City will see significant development on vacant lands within City limits, consistent with the City’s General Plan, designated land use and zoning. There is an area totaling 438 acres in the northern portion of the City, outside City limits, that could be annexed into the City in future years. This potential future area is recognized in the City’s 2020 WMP; however, whether this area is annexed into the City in future years or not, must be part of a separate future study.

The City currently supplies customers municipal water from three (3) wells varying in depth from 863 to 870 feet below ground surface. All three wells have permanent standby power facilities, and each well pumps between 1,000 gallons per minute (gpm) and 1,800 gpm. The City has two potable water storage tanks, the Oak Avenue Tank and the Corporation Yard Tank. These tanks provide 1 million gallons (MG) and 1.5 MG of storage capacity, respectively.

Two of the municipal wells (No. 1 and No. 6) supply water directly to the water storage tank at the Oak Avenue Booster Station and Tank Site, located on Oak Avenue and 13th Street. The wells are located on 14th Street and Cherry Avenue on the northwest portion of the City. These two wells combined are capable of supplying 2,500 gpm of water.

The Corporation Yard Booster Station is located behind the Corporation Yard located at Walnut Avenue and Tenth Street, and the third City well (Well No. 7) is also located on this site. The well pumps about 1800 gpm, and pumps water directly into the 1.5 million gallon tank before water is pumped into the distribution system

3.3 Service Area Climate
Water Code Section 10631 (a)
Describe the service area of the supplier, including… climate...

Water Code Section 10630.

It is the intention of the Legislature, in enacting this part, to permit levels of water management.... while accounting for impacts of climate change Greenfield summers are warm, arid, and clear and the winters are cold, wet, and partly cloudy. Over the course of the year, the temperature typically varies from 41°F to 85°F and is rarely below 33°F or above 93°F. The graphs below show the yearly average high and lows (Figure 3-2), Monthly average rainfall (Figure 3-3) and average wind speeds (Figure 3-4).
195
Cypress Ave
Espinosa Rd
el Camino Real
Zin Ct
Primavera Ct
Vasquez
Ave
Palm Ave
Maple Ave
Bella St
Vía
Salvagno
Oak Ave
Oak Ave
Walker Ln
12th St
Apple Ave
3rd St
Elm Ave
de Leon Dr
Alves Ln
14th St
Emily Cir
Vineyard Dr
Patricia Ln
7th St
Tuscany Ave
Apple Ave
US Hwy
101
Hicks Dr
Gianolini
Pkwy
Madera
Ave
Tyler
Ave
13th St
Chablis Cir
Wilson Cir
Franscioni Dr
Baywood
Way
Hutchison Dr
Gavilan Dr
Tehama
Way
Chardonnay
Dr
Calaveras
Way
7th
St
Victorian
Cir
Paloma
Way
Morris
Way
10th St
St Charles Pl
Elm
Cir
S el Camino Real
Park
Ave
Ava St
Scott Cir
Pinot
Ave
Meadow Cir
Maple Ave
7th St
Reed
Way
8th St
Parkside Ct
Apricot St
Bianco
Way
Los
Padres Ct
Borzini
Cir
Walnut Ave
Renfro
Pl
Sparks
St
Thorne Rd
Palo
Verde St
Tawny
Port
Way
Merlot
Ave
Tyler Ave
Moreno
St
Chalone Dr
Pinnacles Ave
St Matthew St
Heidi Dr
Cherry
Ave
4th St
5th St
6th St
7th St
Scott Dr
Ann
10th St
8th St
9th St
Las Manzaritas Dr
Tuscany
Way
11th St
Morris
Ave
del
Ponte Dr
Romo Dr
San
Antonio Dr
Clifton Ct
Cherry Ave
Huerta
Ave
Susan Ln
Pasque
Ave
Paloma Dr
Don
Vincente Dr
Cherry Ave
Cherry Ave
Livingston Rd
Ventana
Ave
Larson Ln
Harvest
Way
2nd St
Espinosa Rd
Elmwood Dr
Pine Ave
Canal St
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community
1 inch = 1,200 feet
¯

THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR THE EXPRESSED

USE OF THE CITY OF GREENFIELD AND DOES NOT
CONSTITUTE A LEGAL DOCUMENT. WALLACE

GROUP DID NOT PERFORM SURVEY SERVICES
FOR THIS MAP. DATA COMPILED FROM MULTIPLE
SOURCES.

FIGURE 3-1

EXISTING ZONING
M:\1163-Greenfield, City of\005-Water and Wastewater Master Plans\06 - Reports and Calculations\03 - GIS\01 - Map Documents\Preliminary Findings Memorandum Exhibits\Figure 1 - Existing Zoning.mxd; Author: <MAP AUTHOR> 612 CLARION COURT
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401
805 544-4011 www.wallacegroup.us

CIVIL ENGINEERING

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE

MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

PLANNING

PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION

SURVEYING/GIS SOLUTIONS

WATER RESOURCES

WALLACE SWANSON INTERNATIONAL
0 300 600 1,200
Legend
City Boundary
Highway Commercial
Neighborhood Commercial
Retail Business
Professional Office
Light Industrial
Open Space and Recreation
Public and Quasi Public
Single Family Residential (1 to 7 du/acre)
Multiple Family Residential (2 to 15 du/ac)
High Density Multifamily Residential (10 to 20 du/ac)
FIGURE 3-1A

SERVICE AREA

BOUNDARY
196
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 3-5
The cool season lasts for 3.6 months, from November 24 to March 11, with an average daily high temperature below 65°F. The coldest day of the year is typically December 30, with an average low of 41°F and high of 60°F.

3.3.1 Rainfall
To show variation within the months and not just the monthly totals, Figure 3-3 shows the rainfall accumulated over a sliding 31-day period centered around each day of the year. Greenfield experiences significant seasonal variation in monthly rainfall.

The rainy period of the year lasts for approximately 7 months, from October 7 to May 7, with a sliding 31-day rainfall of at least 0.5 inches. The most rain falls during the 31 days centered around February 15, with an average total accumulation of 3.8 inches.

The dry period of the year lasts for approximately 5months, from May 7 to October 7. The least rain falls around August 2, with an average total accumulation of 0.0 inches. 197
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 3-6

3.3.2 Wind
This section discusses the wide-area hourly average wind vector (speed and direction) at 32.8 feet above the ground. The wind experienced at any given location is highly dependent on local topography and other factors, and instantaneous wind speed and direction vary more widely than hourly averages. Figure 3-4 shows average wind speeds by month in the City of Greenfield over the calendar year.

The average hourly wind speed in Greenfield experiences mild seasonal variation over the course of the year. The windier part of the year lasts for 3.6 months, from March 27 to July 15, with average wind speeds of more than 7.4 miles per hour. The windiest day of the year is May 30, with an average hourly wind speed of 8.7 miles per hour. The calmer time of year lasts for 8.4 months, from July 15 to March 27.

The calmest day of the year is November 2, with an average hourly wind speed of 6.1 miles per hour. 198
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 3-7

3.4 Service Area Population
Water Code Section 10631 (a)
Describe the service area of the supplier, including current and projected population. . .

Theprojected population estimates shall be based upon data from the state, regional, or local service agency population projections within the service area of the urban water supplier and shall be in five‐year increments to 20 years or as far as data is available The City current population as of Year 2020 is 18,200 based on Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments (AMBAG). The City’s current service area population and estimated future populations based on AMBAG projections through 2040 can be found in Table 3-1. The 2020 WMP Update identified recent annexations to the City, for which population projections were not addressed in the AMBAG population projections. The population projections, which include these recently annexed lands to the City, is provided in Table 3-2. It is noted that the 2020 WMP projected population through Year 2040.

The Year 2045 projections are based on extrapolation of data from Year 2020 to Year 2040. 199
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 3-8
Table 3-1: Population - Current and Projected (AMBAG)
Population
Served
2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
18,200 19,400 20,400 22,600 25,000 NAa
Note: 2020 population and projections through 2040 interpolated from AMBAG Regional Growth Forecast at http://www.ambag.org/planning
aAMBAG projection did not project to Year 2045.

Table 3-2: Population - Current and Projected (AMBAG Plus Recent Annexations) Population
Served
2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045a
18,200 21,500 24,075 27,325 30,250 32,925
Note: 2020 population and projections through 2040 interpolated from AMBAG Regional Growth Forecast at http://www.ambag.org/planning, and includes projections including recently annexed lands to the City (see Table 3-1, 2020 WMP, City of Greenfield, prepared by Wallace Group). aPopulation projection extrapolated from 2020 WMP.

3.5 Land Uses within Service Area
Water Code Section 10631(a)
The description shall include the current and projected land uses within the existing or anticipated service area affecting the supplier’s water management planning. Urban water suppliers shall coordinate with local or regional land use authorities to determine the most appropriate land use information, including, where appropriate, land use information obtained from local or regional land use authorities…
Greenfield is centered in a highly productive agricultural region. Figure 3-1A illustrates the City’s recently updated boundary, shows the existing Land Use Designations per the 2005 General Plan, and recent annexations. Figure 3-5 provides detail on recent annexations, and the planned developments anticipated within the City. Table 3-3 summarizes the Land Use Designations and Projections (from the 2005 General Plan, plus recent 2020 WMP updates), including recent annexations for major developments such as The Yanks, Pinnacles, Mira Monte Residential Development, and others. This table provides a breakdown of acreage designated for each land use.

3.5.1 Future Development
The City’s Community Development Department provided a summary of the future development anticipated within the City. Much of this development is moving forward, and several parcels have been annexed into the City as indicated previously. A summary of future and pending developments are included in Tables 3-4 and 3-5. There will also be several cannabis facilities that will develop within the City in the coming years, as summarized in Table 3-5.

City of Greenfield Potable Water Distribution System Master Plan Update May 2021, page 3.3-3.7 200
Elm Ave
Oak Ave
Walnut Ave
12th St
13th St
3rd St
2nd St
Apple Ave
El Camino Real
Thorne Rd
Pine Ave
Cypress Ave
Cherry Ave
5th St
8th St
6th St
7th St
11th St
10th St
Livingston Rd
Maple Ave
Camino Real
Access Rd
Yanks Way
Maple Ave
Palm Ave
Pine Ave
El Camino Real
9th St
10th St
Walnut Ave
Cherry Ave
Apple Ave
Walnut Ave
3rd St
Oak Ave
£¤101
£¤101
!(
Las Vines
(Resid ential) SFR
Sub d ivision 50 Acres
142 Units
!(
Vintage Mead ows
110 SFDS
Sub d ivision 20 Acres
Phase 1
!( N ew Ind ustrial/
Com m erc ial Developm ent
228 Acres
!(
Yanks Air Museum
N ew Airport Museum
2 Servic e Stations,
Convenienc e Stores,
W inery, 2 Hotels, Retail, Com m erc ial
!(
The Vines N ew Freeway Com m erc ial
Starb uc ks, Arc o, Carl’s Jr.,
Strip Mall, Hotel, Housing
445,000 Square Feet Com m erc ial
60 Acres
220 Units
!(
N ew Mee
Mem orial Med ical Clinic
W alnut Grove Apartm ents !( 64 Units !(
W alnut Grove Apartm ents
Phase 2&3
143 Units
!(
Arroyo Sec o Elem entary Sc hool
!(
Miram onte
Sub d ivision
166 Units
!(
N ew Resid ential Sub d ivision
EAH
222 Units
!(
Regional Courthouse
!(
Vintage Mead ows
45 Units
Phase 2
!( Couttelenc
Mixed -Use Developm ent
24 Unit
11,500 Square Foot Com m erc ial
!(
T4B2
8 Units
!(
Greenfield Self Storage
Location of N ew W ell Reservoir,
Pum p Station
(1500GPM) (1.5 MG)
22” Carrier Pipe
Availab lefor W ater Or Sewer
(Form er Canal Pipes)
!( 1071 Cherry Ave.

Greenfield Organix !(
525 10th St.

Greenfield Organix Expansion
!(
900 Cherry Ave.

Greenfield Organix
!(
721-799 El Cam ino Real
Se c ond Sun (Gold en State)
!(
600 Cypress Ave.

Kool Gild ea
!(
851 El Cam ino Real
Paper Plane
!(
802 El Cam ino Real
Canna Culture
!(
801 El Cam ino Real
Em erald Mission
!(
689-701 El Cam ino Real
Zen Brand (Mazel Te c h)
!(
710 El Cam ino Real
Red Hunt
!( 36/46/48 4th St.

Greenfield Organix
!(
60 4th St.

East of Ed en
^ ^_ _
Salinas River
FIGURE 4

CITY OF GREENFIELD
NEW AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS SINCE 2016
± 0 1,000 2,000
Feet
Greenfield City Boundary
New Developments
^_ New Development Site
Cannabis Facilities
General Plan Land Use
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
High Density Residential
Downtown Commercial
Highway Commercial
Destination Commercial
Professional Office
Light Industrial
Heavy Industrial
Public Quasi Public
Artisan Agricultural Visitor Serving
Recreation and Open Space
FIGURE 3-3

GREENFIELD NEW AND PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENTS SINCE 2016
FIGURE 3-5
201
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 3-10
Table 3-3 Land Use Designations and Projections Within City Limits 202
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 3-11
Table 3-4 Summary of Future/Pending Developments, City of Greenfield 203
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 3-12
Table 3-5 Cannabis Facilites in Greenfield – Existing and Proposed 204
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 4-1
CHAPTER 4

SYSTEM WATER USE
CWC 10631(e)
(1) Quantity, to the extent records are available, past and current water use, over the same five-year increments described in the subdivision (a), and project water use identifying the uses among water use sector, including not necessary limited to, all of the following uses:
a. Single-family residential
b. Multifamily
c. Commercial
d. Industrial
e. Institutional and governmental
f. Landscape
g. Sale to other agencies
h. Saline water intrusion barriers, ground water recharge, or conjunctive use, or any combination thereof.
i. Agriculture
(2) The water use projections shall be in the same five-year increments described in subdivision (a) This chapter provides a description and quantifies the City’s current water use and water use projections through the year 2045. The data provided in this section allows the City to accurately analyze the use of the water resources, conduct good resource planning, and manage the water supply and appropriately plan future infrastructure investments.

4.1 WATER USE BY TYPE – POTABLE 2020
The City is responsible for operating and maintaining the water system up to the water meter. The majority of the City’s water connections are for single family residential (SFR) accounts. SFR accounts make up 83% of the service connections; multi-family customers (apartments, duplexes, and trailer parks) make up approximately 11% of the customers served. In 2020, water demand for potable water totaled 1921.7 AF, as summarized in Table 4-1.

The water system (as of 2020) supplies water to about 3,772 connections (residential residential, commercial, industrial and institutional, and landscape) and 18,200 people through a network of water lines ranging from 4” to 16” diameter. Each service connection is equipped with a water meter for accounting and billing as summarized in Table 4-2.
205
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 4-2
Table 4-1 Demand for Potable Water – 2020 Actual
Use Type
Additional Description
(as needed)
Level of Treatment
When Delivered Volume
Single Family residential Drinking water 1215.9
Multi-Family residential Drinking water 230.4
Commercial/institutional Drinking water 224.9
Industrial Drinking water 27.3
Landscape irrigation (parks) Drinking water 166.6
Other Hydrants, line flushing,
construction water, etc..

Drinking water 14.4
Losses/Unaccounted For
Water
Drinking water 42.2
Total 1921.7

4.2 WATER USE BY SECTOR – PROJECTED
Table 4-2 lists the number of current (2020) and projected connections by user type. The number of connections were projected using the 2020 WMP population projections, which include the most recent updates on City service area, land use/zoning, and recent annexations. These projections are considered the most representative of the City’s projected growth, even though this value is much higher than the 1.5 percent growth rate in Attachment 2 - Final Draft 2022 Subregional Growth Forecast AMBAG Region and Jurisdictions.

Table 4-2 Projected Number of total connections by used Type Use Type 2020a 2025a 2030 2035 2040 2045
Single Family 3177 3753 4203 4770 5280 5747
Multi-Family 343 405 454 515 570 621
Commercial/institutional 152 180 201 228 253 275
Industrial 12 14 16 18 20 22
Landscape irrigation (parks) 88 104 116 132 146 159
Other - governmental 0 0 0
Agricultural Irrigation 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 3772 4456 4990 5663 5663 6824
aThe significant jump in 2020–2025 (+5%) reflects an assumption that the Pinnacles, Yanks, Las Vines and Miramonte development buildout occurs in this time frame
206
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 4-3
Table 4-3 lists the projected water demands through the year 2045. The projected water demands were calculated based on a per capita water demand projection of 90 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) consistent with the 2020 WMP population projections, and Table 4-2 projected number of connections. This projection using 90 gpcd carries forward the water conservation savings accomplished by the City in achieving the 2020 reduction goals.

Table 4-3 Demands for Potable Water- Projections (Standard Table 4.2) in Acre/Feet Use Type 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Single Family 1371 1536 1743 1929 2100
Multi-Family 260 291 330 366 398
Commercial/institutional 254 284 322 357 388
Industrial 31 34 39 43 47
Landscape irrigation (parks) 188 210 239 264 288
Other - governmental 16 18 21 23 25
Agricultural Irrigation 0 0 0 0 0
Losses/Unaccounted For
Water
48 53 60 67 73
Total 2167 2427 2755 3049 3319
Table 4-4 provides a summary of the City’s potable water demand projections through 2045. The City does not currently have the necessary infrastructure to support a recycled water program. Thus, recycled water demand is not projected for the foreseeable future. Recycled water potential is discussed later in this UWMP.

Table 4-4 Total Water Demand (Standard Table 4.3)
Water Demand Type 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Potable and Raw Water from Table 4.1 2167 2427 2755 3049 3319 Recycled Water Demand from Standard Table 6.4 0 0 0 0 0 Total 2167 2427 2755 3049 3319
Notes: Volume are in the units of AF
207
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 4-4

4.3 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM WATER LOSS
CWC § 10631 (3)
(A)The distribution system water loss shall be quantified for each of the five years preceding the plan update, in accordance with rules adopted pursuant to Section 10608.34. (B) The distribution system water loss quantification shall be reported in accordance with a worksheet approved or developed by the department through a public process. The water loss quantification worksheet shall be based on the water system balance methodology developed by the American Water Works Association.
(C) In the plan due July 1, 2021, and in each update thereafter, data shall be included to show whether the urban retail water supplier met the distribution loss standards enacted by the board pursuant to Section 10608.34
Table 4-5 shows distribution system water losses for the previous five years. Water loss is the sum of apparent and real losses. Apparent loss is associated with metering inaccuracies, billing, and administrative errors, authorized unmetered uses (e.g., system flushing and firefighting), and unauthorized uses. Real loss is associated with physical water lost through line breaks, leaks and seeps, and overflows of storage tanks. Since 2016, urban retail water suppliers have been required under CWC § 10608.34 and California Code of Regulations (CCR) § 638.1 et seq to quantify distribution system water losses using the American Water Works Association (AWWA).

Free Water Audit Software (referred to as “water loss audit reports”). The water loss audit reports the District submits to DWR provide the basis for the 2025-2045 estimates shown in Table 4-4 and are available through DWR’s Water Use Efficiency Data Portal¹. ¹DWR’s Water Use Efficiency Data Portal: https://wuedata.water.ca.gov/awwa_plans 15 Table 4-5 Last Five Years of Water Loss Audit Reporting (DWR Table 4-4) Reporting Period Start
Date
Total Water Production
for Comparison (AF)
Volume of Water
Loss (AF)
Percentage (%) of
Water Loss
01/2020 1,921.7 42.2 2.2
01/2019 1,782.9 81.2 4.6
01/2018 1,810.0 339.2 18.7
01/2017 1791.2 122.9 6.9
01/2016 1590.3 103.8 6.5
Notes: Volume are in the units of AF
Water loss performance standards were developed by DWR and State Water Resources Control Board through rulemaking that became effective in 2023.
208
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 4-5

4.4 FUTURE WATER SAVINGS IN PROJECTED WATER USE.

CWC § 10631 (d) (4)
(A) Water use projections, where available, shall display and account for the water savings estimated to result from adopted codes, standards, ordinances, or transportation and land use plans identified by the urban water supplier, as applicable to the service area. (B) To the extent that an urban water supplier reports the information described in subparagraph (A), an urban water supplier shall do both of the following:
(i) Provide citations of the various codes, standards, ordinances, or transportation and land use plans utilized in making the projections.
(ii) Indicate the extent that the water use projections consider savings from codes, standards, ordinances, or transportation and land use plans. Water use projections that do not account for these water savings shall be noted of that fact.

As affirmed in Table 4-6, both future water savings (discussed below) and lower income residential demands (discussed in Section 4.5) are included in the projections of future water use.

Table 4-6 Inclusion in Water Use Projections (Required DWR Table 4-5) Are Future Savings included in projections? Yes
If "Yes" to above, state the section or page number, in the cell to the right, where citations of the codes, ordinances, or otherwise are utilized in demand projections are found. 4.2 Are Lower Income Residential Demands Included in Projections? 4.5

4.5 WATER USE BY LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN USE PROJECTIONS California Water Code (CWC) Section 10631.1(a) requires suppliers to estimate projected water use for single-family (SFR) and multi-family (MFR) residential housing needed for lower income households, as identified in the Housing Element of the General Plan for the service area of the supplier. It does not require quantification of current water use by lower income households. According to the City’s current Housing Element 2014-2023 (City of Greenfield, 2016), an estimated 39% of households in the City are lower income, defined as having income below 80% of the state median household income.

Demographically, the City has a substantial number of lower income households in the City due to the large number of migrant farm workers in this agricultural community. As such, the projected water demands for lower income housing are essentially built in to the City’s water demand projections through Year 2045. The City exhibits a large person per household density (greater than 5.0), which reduces per capita water demands. In addition, lower income households strive to conserve water in order to keep their monthly water bills low.

As stated in the 2015 UWMP regarding the City’s Housing Element, the City’s inclusionary housing ordinance, and the City’s zoning code (chapter 17) require developable land in the City to be utilized in a manner consistent with state and local land use and housing policies. The inclusionary housing ordinance requires:
209
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 4-6

1. Multifamily Rental Inclusionary Units: 10% of the total units in the development shall be set aside for low-income households and 10% set aside for very low-income households.

2. Non-Multifamily Rental Inclusionary Units: 10% of the total units in the residential development shall be set aside for low-income households and 10% for moderate-income households.

3. For-Sale Inclusionary Units: 10% of the total units in the development shall be set aside for moderate-income households and 10% for low-income households.

Since 2014, the City of Greenfield has built 53 housing units for very low-income families, 84 housing units for low-income families, and 30 units for moderate income families. With 144 units assigned for low and very low-income units, the City of Greenfield is the only jurisdiction in Monterey County that has exceeded its Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) numbers for low-income households this cycle, which does not end until December 2023. In total, Greenfield has built 186 RHNA-qualifying units to date.
https://ci.greenfield.ca.us/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_03092021-448

4.6 CHARACTERISTIC FIVE-YEAR WATER USE
CWC § 10635(b)(3)
(b) Every urban water supplier shall include, as part of its urban water management plan, a drought risk assessment for its water service to its customers as part of information considered in developing the demand management measures and water supply projects and programs to be included in the urban water management plan. The urban water supplier may conduct an interim update or updates to this drought risk assessment within the five-year cycle of its urban water management plan update. The drought risk assessment shall include each of the following…
(4) Considerations of the historical drought hydrology, plausible changes on projected supplies and demands under climate change conditions, anticipated regulatory changes, and other locally applicable criteria.

CWC § 10635(b) is a new requirement for 2020 UWMPs. A critical part of this new statutory language is the requirement to prepare a five-year Drought Risk Assessment (see Section 7.5). To start, DWR suggests that water suppliers estimate their unconstrained water demand for the next five years (2021-2025).

Unconstrained water demand is water use in the absence of drought water use restrictions. Table 4-7 provides a summary of unconstrained water demand for the next five years. 210
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 4-7
Table 4-7 Unconstrained Water Project for Next Five Years Weather Scenario 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Multi-Year Dry 1971 2020 2069 2118 2167
Normal 1971 2020 2069 2118 2167
Total 1971 2020 2069 2118 2167
Notes: Volume are in the units of AF

4.7 CLIMATE CHANGE CONSIDERATIONS
Climate change will continue to affect water management throughout California and could eventually have some impacts on the City of Greenfield. The City is not likely to see any increased risk of flooding by rising sea level since the City is not a coastal city or agency. However, the region may experience changes in temperature, periods of drought, periods of increased rainfall volume, intensity and/or seasonal patterns which could have a large impact on the Salinas River and the Arroyo Seco along with other ecosystems in the region. From a water supply perspective, the City should continue to track potable water use and demands relative to the City’s local water supply (groundwater), and prolonged periods of drought that may reduce overall groundwater aquifer yield. Such an analysis is beyond the scope of this UWMP, but should continue to be considered as part of the City’s urban water management and planning. As noted elsewhere in this UWMP, and in the 2020 WMP, the City is planning for a four municipal supply well to further improve on the water supply reliability in times of drought.

As per California Fourth Climate Change Assessment (Central Coast Region Report):

The Central Coast Region is notable for its extensive natural ecosystems, many of which will be impacted by climate change. Hardwood forests, scrublands, and herbaceous grasslands comprise most of its land cover, with significantly less intensive agriculture and small-to medium-sized cities in the region. There is a strong demand for development in rural areas and agriculture is being developed on lands formerly supporting grazing or natural vegetation. The region continues to reflect an economic and social disconnect between prosperous coastal communities and agricultural areas with many low-income farm workers, inequalities that may result in disadvantaged groups suffering disproportionately from the impacts of climate change. Climate changes that will affect the Central Coast include:
• Maximum and minimum temperatures for the Central Coast will continue to increase through the next century, with greater increases in the inland region. Precipitation is expected to increase slightly, but precipitation variability will increase substantially.
• The future of fog is uncertain because system feedbacks and their response to climate change are not well characterized. Fog can be intercepted by coastal zone fora (which obtain up to one-third of their moisture from fog) and can also prevent low stream flows, which can keep salmonids from drying out during dry periods.
• Periodic El Niño events dominate coastal hazards across the Central Coast while atmospheric rivers, expected to increase, are the dominant drivers of locally extreme rainfall events. • Recently observed and projected acceleration in sea level rise (SLR) poses a significant threat to the regions’ coastal communities. Future flooding is also a serious concern. A recent study suggests that 211
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 4-8
approximately 12,000 residents and $2.4 billion in property could be exposed to flooding due to SLR and storms in Santa Barbara County by the end of the century. A similar level of exposure was predicted for Monterey County.
• Projected future droughts are likely to be a serious challenge to the region’s already stressed water supplies.
• Frequent and sometimes large wildfires will continue to be a major disturbance and post-fire recovery time may be lengthened. The 2017-2018 Tomas Fire led to tragic loss of life and huge social cost, and may be representative of future devastating fires and post-fire effects from climate change • Central Coast native plants are a large part of the world’s floristic provinces. Plant species responses to climate change will in general depend on the climate in which a population evolved and its own unique climate tolerances. Coastal shrublands resilience depends on climate effects to physiological responses that are modified by biotic interactions and the extent of anthropogenic land use.

Grasslands closer to the coast will be less affected than interior grasslands where warming is already documented.
• Climate change outcomes for forests will depend largely on multiple abiotic drivers (increased air temperatures, altered fog patterns, changes in winter precipitation), and biotic factors (invasive species and insect and pest outbreaks).
• Terrestrial wildlife is already experiencing local extinctions. Species may have robust climate refugia in the region’s mountains characterized by cooler temperatures and higher levels of precipitation. • The aquatic life of streams and rivers are threatened by projected extreme swings from drought to foods and exacerbated by fire and erosion that buries habitat in sediments. Climate impacts can threaten the survival of already endangered Steelhead and Coho salmon, and further reduce the diversity and abundance of sensitive aquatic insects.
https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2019-11/Reg_Report-SUM-CCCA4-2018-006_CentralCoast_ADA.pdf 212
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 5-1
CHAPTER 5
SB X7-7 BASELINE AND TARGETS
CWC § 10608.24 (b)
Each urban retail water supplier shall meet its urban water use target by December 31, 2020 CWC § 10608.28
(a) An urban retail water supplier may meet its urban water use target within its retail service area, or through mutual agreement, by any of the following:
(1) Through an urban wholesale water supplier.
(2) Through a regional agency authorized to plan and implement water conservation, including, but not limited to, an agency established under the Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency Act (Division 31(commencing with Section 81300)). (3) Through a regional water management group as defined in Section 10537. (4) By an integrated regional water management funding area. (5) By hydrologic region.
(6) Through other appropriate geographic scales for which computation methods have been developed by the department.
(b) A regional water management group, with the written consent of its member agencies, may undertake any or all planning, reporting, and implementation functions under this chapter for the member agencies that consent to those activities. Any data or reports shall provide information both for the regional water management group and separately for each consenting urban retail water supplier and urban wholesale water supplier.

The Water Conservation Act of 2009, also known as Senate Bill (SB) X7-7, requires that urban retail water suppliers reduce their per capita water use by 20 percent by 2020. SB X7-7 defines an urban retail water supplier as “a water supplier, either publicly or privately owned, that directly provides potable municipal water to more than 3,000 end users or that supplies more than 3,000 acre-feet of potable water annually at retail for municipal purposes” (CWC § 10608.12). To meet the urban water use target requirement, each retail supplier was required to determine its baseline water use, as well as its target water use by December 31, 2020 (i.e., “20 by 2020”).

5.1 Updating Calculations From 2015 UWMP
The DWR 2020 UWMP Guidebook for Urban Water Suppliers (Guidebook) requires water agencies preparing 2020 UWMPs to verify 2020 water use targets identified in their 2015 UWMP. Requirements for updating calculations for baselines and targets would be based on the need to incorporate updated data or desire of the urban water supplier to change the SBX7-7 compliance methodology. It is noted that the 2015 calculated 10-15 year baseline demand included one year (Year 2000) with no data, and two subsequent years (Years 2001, 2002) with erroneous data. The City updated the baseline calculation using a 7-year baseline, years 2003 through 2009.
213
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 5-2
In this chapter, it is demonstrated that the City has achieved its 2020 target reduction. Compliance with the urban water use target requirement is verified in the SB X7-7 Verification/Compliance Forms, which are included as Appendix B.

5.2 Establishing Baselines And Targets
The City is required to be in compliance with SBX7-7 either individually or as part of an alliance, or demonstrate it has a plan or has secured funding to be in compliance, in order to be eligible for waterrelated state grants and loans.

SB X7-7 and DWR provided four different methods for calculation of an urban water retailer’s 2020 target. Three of these methods are defined in Water Code Section 10608.20(a)(1), and the fourth method was developed by DWR. The 2020 water use target may be calculated using one of the following four methods:
• Method 1: Per-capita daily use equals 80 percent of the water supplier’s baseline per capita usage. • Method 2: Per-capita daily use is set based on performance standards applied to indoor residential use, landscape area water use, and commercial, industrial, and institutional use. • Method 3: Per-capita daily use is set at 95 percent of the applicable state hydrologic region target based on DWR’s 2011 20x2020 Water Conservation Plan (Soledad is in the Central Coast Region).
• Method 4: Per-capita daily use is set based on standards consistent with California Urban Water Conservation Council (CUWCC)1 BMPs
To comply with SBX7-7, the City selected Method 1 to calculate its 2020 target in its 2015 and 2020 UWMPs.

Daily average water use is divided by the service area population to obtain baseline and target GPCD. In 2020, the City adjusted its baseline and target GPCD to reflect its updated population estimates based on 2010 Census data results, AMBAG projections, and recent annexations to the City. Details of determining 2020 service area population are provided in Section 5.3. The City’s baselines and targets are summarized in Section 5.5. The City’s 2020 compliance water use is provided in Section 5.6.

5.3 Service Area Population
To correctly calculate its compliance year GPCD, the City must determine the population that it served in 2020. Refer to Table 5-1 for methodology used for population estimates. The year 2020 population was determined to be 18,200 (see Table 5-2). Refer to Section 3.4, and Table 3-1B. 214
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 5-3
Table 5-1 Method for Population Estimates (SB X7-7 Table 2) Method Used to Determine 2020 Population (may check more than one) ( X ) 1. Department of Finance (DOF) or American Community Survey (ACS)a ( ) 2. Persons-per-Connection Method
( X ) 3. DWR Population toola
( ) 4. Other – DWR recommended pre-review
aAMBAG population projection used to adjust numbers, plus review of recent annexations, See Section 3.4.

Table 5-2. Service Area Population (SB X&-7 table 3)
2020 Compliance Year Population
2020 18200
Notes: Population is from the Department finance

5.4 Baseline Periods, Baseline GPCD, And Confirmed SB X7-7 2020 Targets Table 5-3 shows the City’s 5- and 10-year baseline periods, its baseline gallons per capita per day (GPCD) for these periods, and its confirmed SB X7-7 2020 target. The data used to calculate the baseline and target GPCD values are provided in Appendix B.

Table 5-3 SB X&_& baseline and targets summary (DWR TABLE 5-1) Baseline Period Start Year End Year Average Baseline
GPCD
Confirmed 2020 Target
GPCD
10- 15 years 2003 2009 133 106
5 years 2005 2009 126 120---

5.5 Demonstration of Compliance with SB X7-7 2020 Target Service area population in 2020 was 18,200 and water use was 1921.7 AF, resulting in per capita water use of 90 GPCD (which includes un-accounted for water). This is less than the target GPCD, as shown in Table 5-4.

Table 5-4 SB X7-7 2020 Compliance (DWR TABLE 5-2)
2020 GPCD Adjusted 2020
GPCD
(adjusted if
applicable)
2020 Confirmed
Target GPCD
Did Supplier Achieve
Target Reduction for
Actual 2020 2020?
GPCD
2020 Total
Adjustments
90 106 yes
Notes:
215
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 6-1
CHAPTER 6

WATER SUPPLY CHARACTERIZATION
CWC § 10631 (b)
A plan shall be adopted in accordance with this chapter that shall do all of the following:

Identify and quantify, to the extent practicable, the existing and planned sources of water available to the supplier over the same five-year increments described in subdivision (a).

The Urban Water Management Planning Act requires a description and quantification of the current and projected sources of water available to the City. The Urban Water Management Planning Act also requires a discussion of potential uses and availability of recycled water.

Chapter 6 provides an overview of the City’s water sources, current and projected supply, wastewater services and available recycled water, other water source opportunities, future water supply projects, climate change impacts on water supply, and a review of energy intensity of City water facilities. This chapter includes the following sections:

6.1 Purchased Water

6.2 Groundwater

6.3 Surface Water

6.4 Stormwater

6.5 Wastewater and Recycled Water

6.6 Desalinated Water Opportunities

6.7 Water Exchanges and Transfers

6.8 Future Water Projects

6.9 Summary of Existing and Planned Sources of Water

6.10 Special Conditions

6.11 Energy Intensity
216
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 6-2

6.1 Purchased Water
California Water Code § 10631 (h)
A plan shall be adopted in accordance with this chapter and shall do all of the following:

An urban water supplier that relies upon a wholesale agency for a source of water shall provide the wholesale agency with water use projections from that agency for that source of water in five-year increments to 20 years or as far as data is available. The wholesale agency shall provide information to the urban water supplier for inclusion in the urban water supplier’s plan that identifies and quantifies, to the extent practicable, the existing and planned sources of water as required by subdivision (b), available from the wholesale agency to the urban water supplier over the same five-year increments, and during various water-year types in accordance with subdivision (f). An urban water supplier may rely upon water supply information provided by the wholesale agency in fulfilling the plan informational requirements of subdivisions (b) and (f).

The City does not currently purchase or import water, nor does it have any plans to do so. The City currently relies on local groundwater supplies for 100% as its source of water supply.

6.2 Groundwater
California Water Code § 10631
(b) Identify and quantify, to the extent practicable, the existing and planned sources of water available to the supplier over the same five-year increments described in subdivision (a), providing supporting and related information, including all of the following:
(4) If groundwater is identified as an existing or planned source of water available to the supplier, all of the following information:
(A) The current version of any groundwater sustainability plan or alternative adopted pursuant to Part 2.74 (commencing with Section 10720), any groundwater management plan adopted by the urban water supplier, including plans adopted pursuant to Part 2.75 (commencing with Section 10750), or any other specific authorization for groundwater management for basins underlying the urban water supplier’s service area. (B) A description of any groundwater basin or basins from which the urban water supplier pumps groundwater.

For basins that a court or the board has adjudicated the rights to pump groundwater, a copy of the order or decree adopted by the court or the board and a description of the amount of groundwater the urban water supplier has the legal right to pump under the order or decree. For a basin that has not been adjudicated, information as to whether the department has identified the basin as a high- or medium-priority basin in the most
current official departmental bulletin that characterizes the condition of the groundwater basin, and a detailed description of the efforts being undertaken by the urban water supplier to coordinate with groundwater sustainability agencies or groundwater management agencies listed in subdivision (c) of Section 10723 to maintain or achieve sustainable groundwater conditions in accordance with a groundwater sustainability plan or alternative adopted pursuant to Part 2.74 (commencing with Section 10720). (C) A detailed description and analysis of the location, amount, and sufficiency of groundwater pumped by the urban water supplier for the past five years. The description and analysis shall be based on information that is reasonably available, including, but not limited to, historic use records. 217
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 6-3

6.2.1 Basin description
The City of Greenfield overlies the Forebay Subarea of the Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin (SGVB).

The Forebay Subarea occupies the central portion of the Salinas Valley and extends from the town of Gonzales in the north to approximately three miles south of Greenfield (Figure 6-1). The Forebay Subarea is approximately 87,000 acres with a storage capacity of 5,720,000 AF. Data from the Department of Water Resources identified in-ground storage of 4,530,000 AF in 2003.

Infiltration in the Salinas River channel is the principal source of groundwater recharge for the SVGB.

The recharge area is generally believed to end at a point between Chualar and the City of Salinas. Both natural runoff and conservation releases from the Nacimiento and San Antonio Reservoirs contribute to the flow in the Salinas River. Infiltration from smaller tributaries that drain the highland areas also provides recharge to the groundwater basin. The down-valley movement of this subsurface water is essential to the containment of saltwater intrusion into the Pressure Subarea. Higher elevations tend to have little potential for groundwater recharge due to both shallow or non-existent soils and steep slopes.

Additional details of the SVGB are presented in DWR Groundwater Bulletin 118.

Groundwater consumption in the Salinas Valley has increased over time as the number of croplands under irrigation has continued to increase annually. Continued residential, commercial, and industrial development has also increased groundwater consumption. In 2015, agricultural pumping accounted for 93 percent of total groundwater pumping and urban uses accounted for the remaining seven percent of the reported extractions in the SVGB. The Forebay Subbasin, specifically, showed agricultural pumping accounted for approximately 96 percent and urban uses for four percent of extractions Figure 6-1. Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin Map
218
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 6-4
The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) was signed on September 16, 2014 by Governor Brown. The SGMA is intended to “strengthen local management and monitoring of groundwater basins most critical to the state’s water needs” (Governor’s Office of Planning & Research). The City and Clark Colony Water Company have submitted application to Department of Water Resources to be a Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA) with authority and jurisdiction to undertake sustainable groundwater management for that portion of the Forebay Subarea that covers both the City limits and the Clark Colony service area. The GSA has received numerous petitions from adjoining landowners to include the petitioned lands in the management area of the GSA.

The Arroyo Seco Groundwater Sustainability Agency (ASGSA) is a GSA that was formed in 2017. The ASGSA represents agriculture, municipal, and environmental stakeholders and is responsible for developing GSPs in much of the Salinas Valley.

The ASGSA is currently working with the Salinas Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency (SVBGSA) to develop GSPs for all or part of six subbasins in the Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin (Valley), including the 180/400 Foot Aquifer Subbasin (3-4.01), the East Side Aquifer Subbasin (3-4.02), the Forebay Aquifer Subbasin (3-4.04), the Upper Valley Aquifer Subbasin (3-4.05), the Langley Area Subbasin (3-4.09), and the Monterey Subbasin (3-4.10).

The Forebay Aquifer Subbasin falls partially within the jurisdiction of the ASGSA and partially within the jurisdiction of the SVBGSA. The GSA boundaries overlap; therefore, neither GSA is considered an exclusive GSA in the Subbasin. Only exclusive GSAs can submit GSPs to DWR. The two GSAs will, therefore, remedy the overlap before the current draft GSP is finalized and submitted to DWR.

The ASGSA is a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) with membership comprising the City of Greenfield and Clark Colony Water. The ASGSA is governed by a five-member Board of Directors (Board), representing public and private groundwater interests throughout the South Salinas Valley Basin. In addition, an Advisory Committee ensures participation by, and input to, the Board by constituencies whose interests are not directly represented on the Board. The ASGSA’s activities are coordinated by a General Manager.

6.2.2 Historic Groundwater Pumping past five Years
The City’s water system is owned and operated by the City of Greenfield. The City has three wells (Figure 6-2). Well #1 and Well #6 are located on 14th Street and Cherry Avenue northwest of the City. Well #1 was drilled in 1979 and has a capacity of 1364 gpm. Well #6 was drilled in 1998 and has a capacity of 1220 gpm. Well #7, located at the City’s corporation yard at 10th Street and Walnut Avenue, has a capacity of 1699 gpm. The three wells have a capacity to extract approximately 15 acre/feet per day or 4.9 MGD.

The City’s three active wells meet existing demands. The volume of groundwater pumped by the City over the past five years is summarized on Table 6-1. Historically, the Forebay Subarea has met the City’s water demands, even during times of drought. The Forebay Subarea will meet the City’s water demands in the future. The City’s water supply, however, should be evaluated relative to the capabilities of the City’s groundwater wells to supply water to City customers.
219
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 6-5
FIGURE 6-2: EXISTING GROUNDWATER WELL LOCATIONS
220
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 6-6
Table 6-1 Groundwater Pumped Past five years
Groundwater Type Location or Basin Name Volume (AF)
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Alluvia Basin
Well #1 (14th St. & Cherry Ave.)¹ 451 407 120 602 760
Well #6 (14th St. & Cherry Ave.)² 537 600 971 663 316
Well #7 (520 10th St.)³ 600 788 722 507 845
Total 1588 1794 1813 1773 1921
¹ Well #1 was repaired in 2019
² Well #7 was repaired in summer 2019
³ Well #6 was repaired in spring 2020

6.3 Surface Water
The City does not use any surface water as part of its water supply. All water is from subsurface groundwater from the Forebay Subarea aquifer.

6.4 Stormwater
Through 2020 and consistent with previous UWMPs, the City does not use stormwater as part of its water supply. The City collects storm water in storm water percolation ponds located throughout the City. Water in the ponds percolates back into the groundwater subarea. This groundwater recharge is not included in the City’s supply calculations. Collected storm water is not currently diverted for beneficial reuse.

6.5 Wastewater and Recycled Water
California Water Code § 10633
The plan shall provide, to the extent available, information on recycled water and its potential for use as a water source in the service area of the urban water supplier. The preparation of the plan shall be coordinated with local water, wastewater, groundwater, and planning agencies that operate within the supplier’s service area.

As reported in the 2015 UWMP, no recycled water distribution infrastructure exists between the City and the WWTP. To develop distribution piping from the WWTP to areas throughout the City is presently cost prohibitive. Additionally, there are no large‐scale users that would benefit in proportion to the cost of installing a separate recycled water distribution system, except that local agricultural lands and sod farms (near the WWTP) could be viable Users of recycled water in future years, once recycled water becomes available. The City is in the process of upgrading its wastewater treatment plant, and future recycled water opportunities will continue to be assessed.

The City is responsible for the collection, treatment, and disposal of wastewater within the UWMP service area. The City’s wastewater treatment facility (WWTP) is located near the eastern limit of the City, as shown on Figure 6-3.
221

WASTEWATER TREATMENT
PLANT FIGURE 6-3 CITY OF GREENFIELD WWTP
222
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 6-8
The City of Greenfield Wastewater Treatment Plant is operated and maintained in accordance with new General Order (R3-2020-0020) from the Regional Water Quality Control Board for Discharges From Domestic Wastewater Systems With Flows Greater Than 100,000 Gallons Per Day. As part of the General Order, the City plans to move forward with the implementation of a new 2.0 mgd advanced wastewater plant that will comply with the new General Order effluent limitations. In the future, the City may consider producing tertiary recycled water which could be used for local irrigation purposes thus off-setting the use of potable water. The City’s WWTP treated a total of 1174 AF in 2020 (Table 6-2). This treated effluent percolated back into the local underlying groundwater.

TABLE 6-2: Wastewater Collection Within the service area in 2020 (WDR Table 6-2) Wastewater Collection Recipient of collected wastewater Name of
Wastewater
Collection
Agency
Wastewater
Volume
Metered or
Estimated
Volume of
wastewater
collected from
UWMP Service
Area 2020 (AF)
Name of
Wastewater
Treatment Agency
Receiving Collected
Wastewater
Treatment
Plant
Name
Is WWTP
Located
within the
UWMP
Area?
Is WWTP
Operation
Contracted to
third Party
City of
Greenfield Metered 1174 City of Greenfield Greenfield WWTP Yes No Notes: 100 percent of the City’s service area and its population are covered by wastewater collection system The Greenfield Wastewater Treatment Plant incorporates a variety of unit processes. Primary treatment occurs at the headworks facility, which consists of a mechanical screen/washer which removes large solids from the influent wastewater. Secondary biological treatment utilizes aeration ponds. The basic disposal concept is to percolate all the wastewater into the ground in a manner that protects the public health, maintains, or enhances the existing groundwater quality and does not create a visual or odor nuisance. A summary of the existing WWTP related to wastewater treatment and discharge is included in Table 6-3.

The existing WWTP is not capable of achieving the new General Order Waste Discharge Requirements.

Thus, the City is actively pursuing the construction and implementation of a new state-of-the-art membrane bioreactor plant, capable of producing high quality secondary effluent. The City may consider adding tertiary treatment (filtration, disinfection), and recycled water distribution/storage/pumping facilities to delivery recycled water to local reuse sites. The viability of a recycled water program was evaluated as part of the WWTP master plan prepared by Carollo Engineers. Funding of the new WWTP is uncertain at this time, and thus the timing of when the new WWTP will be on-line is not known, and implementation of a recycled water program is also uncertain. 223
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 6-9
TABLE 6-3: Wastewater Treatment and Discharge within Service Area in 2020 Wastewater Collection Recipient of collected wastewater Wastewater
Treatment
Plant Name
Discharge
Location
name &
Location
Method
of
Disposal
Does This Plant
Treat
Wastewater
generated
outside the
Service Area?
Treatment
Level
Wastewater
Treated (AF)
Discharged
Treated
Wastewater
(AF)
Recycled
within
Service
Area
Recycled
outside within
Service Area
Greenfield
WWTP
Greenfield
Rapid
Infiltration
Basins
Discharge
to Land No Secondary Treatment 1174 1174 0 0

6.5.1 Recycled Water System and Recycled Water Beneficial Uses California Water Code § 10633(c-g)
(c) A description of the recycled water currently being used in the supplier’s service area, including, but not limited to, the type, place, and quantity of use.
(d) A description and quantification of the potential uses of recycled water, including, but not limited to, agricultural irrigation, landscape irrigation, wildlife habitat enhancement, wetlands, industrial reuse, groundwater recharge, indirect potable reuse, and other appropriate uses, and a determination with regard to the technical and economic feasibility of serving those uses. (e) The projected use of recycled water within the supplier’s service area at the end of 5, 10, 15, and 20 years and
a description of the actual use of recycled water in comparison to uses previously projected pursuant to this subdivision.
(f) A description of actions, including financial incentives, which may be taken to encourage the use of recycled water, and the projected results of these actions in terms of acre-feet of recycled water used per year. (g) A plan for optimizing the use of recycled water in the supplier’s service area, including actions to facilitate the installation of dual distribution systems, to promote recirculating uses, to facilitate the increased use of treated wastewater that meets recycled water standards, and to overcome any obstacles to achieving that increased
Currently, as shown in Table 6-4, Table 6-5 and Table 6-6, no wastewater is recycled for direct reuse within the City of Greenfield and there is no current use of recycled water in the City service area. The existing WWTP is not capable of producing recycled water of sufficient water quality for local reuse.

Table 6-4: Current and Projected Recycled Water Direct Beneficial Uses Within Service Area (X) Recycled water is not currently produced, and therefore there is no current reuse program. The City may consider recycled used in future years, depending on availability of funding for a new membrane bioreactor WWTP and tertiary recycled water treatment, pumping and distribution system.
224
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 6-10
Table 6-5: Wholesale: 2020 UWMP Recycled Water Use Projection Compared to 2015 Actual (X) Recycled water was not used or distributed by the supplier in 2015, nor projected for use or distribution in 2020. The supplier will not complete the table below.

Table 6-6: Methods to Expand Future Recycled Water Use
(X) Supplier does not have an existing recycled water program; however recycled water production and use may be considered in future years. See response in Table 6-4.

6.6 Desalinated Water Opportunities
California Water Code § 10631 (g)
A plan shall be adopted in accordance with this chapter and shall do all of the following:

Describe the opportunities for development of desalinated water, including, but not limited to, ocean water, brackish water, and groundwater, as a long-term supply.

There are no opportunities for the development of desalinated water in the Greenfield area. Greenfield is in an inland valley located 40 miles from any potential saline water sources.

6.7 Exchanges or Transfer
California Water Code § 10631 (c)
A plan shall be adopted in accordance with this chapter and shall do all of the following:

Describe the opportunities for exchanges or transfers of water on a short-term or long-term basis.

Greenfield is not pursuing any transfer or exchange agreements. Groundwater has been and will continue to be a reliable water source for the City. The City is not adjacent to any other water agencies and emergency interties are not possible.

6.8 Future Water Projects
California Water Code § 10631 A plan shall be adopted in accordance with this chapter and shall do all of the following:
(b) (3) For any planned sources of water supply, a description of the measures that are being undertaken to acquire and develop those water supplies.
(f) Include a description of all water supply projects and water supply programs that may be undertaken by the urban water supplier to meet the total projected water use, as established pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section
10635. The urban water supplier shall include a detailed description of expected future projects and programs that the urban water supplier may implement to increase the amount of the water supply available to the urban water supplier in normal and single-dry water years and for a period of drought lasting five consecutive water years. The description shall identify specific projects and include a description of the increase in water supply that is expected to be available from each project. The description shall include an estimate with regard to the implementation timeline for each project or program. 225
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 6-11
The City’s recent 2020 WMP Report recommends capital improvement projects to mitigate hydraulic deficiencies, including improved water supply reliability. Refer to Table 6-7 for a summary of planned water improvement projects.

Table 6-7: Expected Future Water Supply Projects or Program Name of
Future Project
or Program
Joint Project
with Other
Agencies
Description Planned
Implementation
Planned for
Use in Year
Type
Expected Increase
in Water Supply
to Agency (AF)
Construction
of Well #8 No
Well Construction
consistent with City’s
2020 System Master
Plan Update
2026 2026 1200

1.5 MG Water
Storage Tank No

1.5 MG Water Tank
on Existing
Corporation Yard
Site
2026 2026 NA

1.0 MG Water
Storage Tank
and Booster
Station
No

1.0 MG Water
Storage Tank and
Booster Station
2035 2035 NA

6.8.1 Supply Recommendations
Review of the City of Greenfield’s water production capabilities resulting from their existing wells indicates that the City of Greenfield water supply is sufficient today, but will be marginal in the future with respect to maximum day conditions (largest well out of service), and thus will have a supply deficit under future maximum day demand conditions. At least one additional well is needed to meet the minimum criteria set forth by the California Water Works Standards. The City is planning for the addition of one new municipal water well within the next several years. This well may be constructed in conjunction with some future Development(s) if possible; otherwise the City will implement this Project on its own. The new well will be a 1,500 gpm well, and will include a corresponding booster station and

1.5 MG water storage tank. Assuming the well operates 12 hours per day, this new well will reliably produce 1,200 AFY. Based on information provided by the City, the east side of the City is not the best place to construction a new water well from a water production/water quality perspective. Thus, the City has recommended that the new well be placed near existing Wells 1 and 6 on the west side of the City (14th Street between Cherry and Walnut Avenues). These three supply wells would be used to directly fill the Oak Tank and the third new water tank, prior to be fed into the water distribution system.

6.8.2 Storage Recommendations
Review of the City of Greenfield’s existing water storage facilities indicates that the City of Greenfield has a storage deficit under both existing and future conditions. Additional storage is needed to meet the minimum criteria set forth in this chapter. The City’s plan for a new water storage tank is discussed in paragraph 6.8.1.
226
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 6-12
Even with the addition of a future 1.5 MG water storage tank, the City may see a future deficit of 1 MG in storage. The City has a footprint available at the Corporation Yard for a second 1.5 MG tank (sister tank) adjacent to the existing tank. The City should continue to plan for providing a tank at this location, provide at least one more tank of 1.0 MG at another location in the City, to fulfill ultimate build-out water storage needs.

6.8.3 Other Major Capital Improvement Projects
In addition to water distribution pipeline improvements, other significant capital improvement projects as part of the City's overall water system are recommended. These items include a water supply well and water storage tanks (discussed in Para. 6.8.2), and water meter and lateral replacements.

The City provides on-going review of its water service lateral and meter replacement program to ensure regular maintenance and replacement of aging meters and laterals, to minimize water losses and ensure accurate water metering and billing. This dovetails into overall recommendations that the City have sufficient resources to replace older water mains throughout the City, particularly the old asbestos cement water and cast-iron water mains.

6.8.4 Water Supply
In Potable Water Distribution System Master Plan Update Chapter 5, it was recommended that the City provide at least one new domestic water well (Well #8) in the future. The additional well is needed to ensure water supply reliability for future demands, when the largest well may go out of service. This is discussed in Paragraph 6.8.1, and as noted, this new well will reliably provide 1,200 AFY water production. It is envisioned this new well should come on in line within the next several years (Priority 1 Project), in conjunction with major developments forthcoming, or the City should implement this Project as a stand-alone capital improvement project. The well is recommended to be located at or near existing Wells 1 and 6 (at 14th Street between Cherry and Walnut Avenues). Information on the existing water transmission main from this existing well site to the existing distribution system (in the vicinity of the Oak Tank and Booster Station) was not available, however the City should evaluate if all three wells (Wells 1, 6 and 7) can operate/pump simultaneously through the transmission main (especially under the scenario where Well 7 is out of service for any reason) without inducing excessive head loss (pressure loss) and thus reduced well pumping capacity.

6.8.5 Water Booster Stations
At this time, specific capital improvement projects are not identified for the booster stations. However, a new water booster station will be required when the City adds a new water storage tank, if not on the Corporation Yard site (for which the new tank would utilize the existing booster station to distribute/pump water).

6.8.6 Water Meters and Water Services
The City has identified the need to address leaky water services and meters in need of replacement. It is difficult to quantify a CIP for these items; however, the City will maintain an annual budget to address these items as they arise. The City maintains an inventory of the meters by age, and water services by age and material. A more defined program for replacement can then be developed from this information.

Furthermore, replacement of water meters and services should be considered when opportunities arise, such as when water mains are also being replaced.
227
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 6-13

6.9 Summary of Existing and Planned Sources of Water
California Water Code § 10631
(b) Identify and quantify, to the extent practicable, the existing and planned sources of water available to the supplier over the same five-year increments described in subdivision (a).

California Water Code § 10631 (b) (2)
When multiple sources of water supply are identified, a description of the management of each supply in correlation with the other identified supplies.

California Water Code § 10631 (b) (4) (D)
A detailed description and analysis of the amount and location of groundwater that is projected to be pumped by the urban water supplier. The description and analysis shall be based on information that is reasonably available, including, but not limited to, historic use records.

The City’s existing groundwater supply source has historically been adequate to meet the City’s demands.

Table 6-8 summarizes the total water pumped in 2020.

Table 6-8: Water Supplies
Water Supply Additional Detail
on Water Supply
2020
Actual
Volume Water Quality Total Right or Safe Yield (optional) Groundwater (Not
Desalinated)
Upper Valley
Aquifer Subbasin 1922
Drinking
Water
Notes: Volumes are in Units of AF
The City provides water service to areas within the city through a system of municipal wells, water treatment, aboveground storage, pumping stations and distribution pipes, which provide water to all areas of the city, including for fire protection/suppression. The City has sufficient water capacity for all areas within the existing city limits and within areas designated for growth (Expansion Areas), with the addition of the identified water system facilities in the prior Section. The City intends to continue to use ground water as the sole source of potable water. Groundwater supply may be augmented with recycled water in the future, should such recycled water become available. The City’s projected extraction is equal to about 4.75% of the total extraction to the annual sustainable yield of the Forebay Subarea, which is estimated to be around 132,233 acre-feet in 2020. Figure 6-4 Groundwater Extraction Form- Data (page 3) and Summary Forebay Subarea-Extraction Data (page 9) from 2020 Monterey County Water Resource Agency , July 2021:

July 2021- 2020 Ground Extraction Summary Report.
https://www.co.monterey.ca.us/government/government-links/water-resourcesagency/programs/groundwater-extractions-gems 228
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 6-14
Figure 6-4 Groundwater Extraction Form – Data Summary
229
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 6-15
230
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 6-16

6.10 Climate Change Effects
Weather in the Salinas Valley changes on a yearly to monthly basis. Some of the weather changes from year to year are caused by the El Niño and La Niña phenomena climate patterns in the Pacific Ocean that affect weather worldwide. This is discussed in the California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment, Central Coast Region Report Section Physical Impacts on Climate Changes. page 6.( See Appendix C) The Central Coast Region is notable for its extensive natural ecosystems, many of which will be impacted by climate change. Hardwood forests, scrublands, and herbaceous grasslands comprise most of its land cover, with significantly less intensive agriculture and small-to medium-sized cities in the region. There is a strong demand for development in rural areas and agriculture is being developed on lands formerly supporting grazing or natural vegetation. The region continues to reflect an economic and social disconnect between prosperous coastal communities and agricultural areas with many low-income farm workers, inequalities that may result in disadvantaged groups suffering disproportionately from the impacts of climate change Climate changes that will affect the Central Coast include:

1. Maximum and minimum temperatures for the Central Coast will continue to increase through the next century, with greater increases in the inland region. Precipitation is expected to increase slightly, but precipitation variability will increase substantially.

2. The future of fog is uncertain because system feedbacks and their response to climate change are not well characterized. Fog can be intercepted by coastal zone fora (which obtain up to one-third of their moisture from fog) and can also prevent low stream flows, which can keep salmonids from drying out during dry periods.

3. Periodic El Niño events dominate coastal hazards across the Central Coast while atmospheric rivers, expected to increase, are the dominant drivers of locally extreme rainfall events.

4. Recently observed and projected acceleration in sea level rise (SLR) poses a significant threat to the regions’ coastal communities. Future flooding is also a serious concern. A recent study suggests that approximately 12,000 residents and $2.4 billion in property could be exposed to flooding due to SLR and storms in Santa Barbara County by the end of the century. A similar level of exposure was predicted for Monterey County.

5. Projected future droughts are likely to be a serious challenge to the region’s already stressed water supplies.

6. Frequent and sometimes large wildfires will continue to be a major disturbance and post-free recovery time may be lengthened. The 2017-2018 Tomas Fire led to tragic loss of life and huge social cost, and may be representative of future devastating frees and post-fire effects from climate change

7. Central Coast native plants are a large part of the world’s floristic provinces. Plant species responses to climate change will in general depend on the climate in which a population evolved and its own unique climate tolerances. Coastal shrublands resilience depends on climate effects to physiological responses that are modified by biotic interactions and the extent of anthropogenic land use. Grasslands closer to the coast will be less affected than interior grasslands where warming is already documented.

8. Climate change outcomes for forests will depend largely on multiple abiotic drivers (increased air temperatures, altered fog patterns, changes in winter precipitation), and biotic factors (invasive species and insect and pest outbreaks).

9. Terrestrial wildlife is already experiencing local extinctions. Species may have robust climate refugia in the region’s mountains characterized by cooler temperatures and higher levels of precipitation.

10. The aquatic life of streams and rivers are threatened by projected extreme swings from drought to foods and exacerbated by fire and erosion that buries habitat in sediments. Climate impacts can 231
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 6-17
threaten the survival of already endangered Steelhead and Coho salmon, and further reduce the diversity and abundance of sensitive aquatic insects.

6.11 Energy Intensity
California Water Code § 10631.2
(a) In addition to the requirements of Section 10631, an urban water management plan shall include any of the following information that the urban water supplier can readily obtain:
(1) An estimate of the amount of energy used to extract or divert water supplies. (2) An estimate of the amount of energy used to convey water supplies to the water treatment plants or distribution systems.
(3) An estimate of the amount of energy used to treat water supplies. (4) An estimate of the amount of energy used to distribute water supplies through its distribution systems. (5) An estimate of the amount of energy used for treated water supplies in comparison to the amount used for nontreated water supplies.
(6) An estimate of the amount of energy used to place water into or withdraw from storage. (7) Any other energy-related information the urban water supplier deems appropriate. (b) The department shall include in its guidance for the preparation of urban water management plans a methodology for the voluntary calculation or estimation of the energy intensity of urban water systems.

The department may consider studies and calculations conducted by the Public Utilities Commission in developing the methodology.
(c) The Legislature finds and declares that energy use is only one factor in water supply planning and shall not be considered independently of other factors.

The 2020 UWMPs are now required to include readily available information on the energy used for providing potable water to its customers. This includes the energy for pumping, diversion, conveyance, storage, treatment, and distribution of water.

The “total Utility Approach” as defined by DWR in the UWMP Guidebook 2020 is used to report waterrelated energy-consumption data for the City of Greenfield. Calendar year 2019 is selected as the oneyear reporting period, and utility bills for the associated time are used as the source for energy consumption data. Utility bills for well pumps, water booster stations and water yard energy usage were used to calculate water system energy consumption for the City of Greenfield during calendar year 2019:

Table 6-9 shows the energy consumed for each acre foot (AF) of potable water entering the distribution system in the City of Greenfield. This energy includes Well Pumps and Booster Stations conveyance of drinking water. Based on this, the energy intensity is estimated to be 368 kilowatt hours per acre-foot (kWh/AF).
232
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 6-18
Table 6-9 Recommended Energy Intensity –
233
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 7-1
CHAPTER 7

WATER SUPPLY RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT
California Water Code § 10620 (f)
An urban water supplier shall describe in the plan water management tools and options used by that entity that will maximize resources and minimize the need to import water from other regions.

California Water Code § 10630.5
Each plan shall include a simple lay description of how much water the agency has on a reliable basis, how much it needs for the foreseeable future, what the agency’s strategy is for meeting its water needs, the challenges facing the agency, and any other information necessary to provide a general understanding of the agency’s plan
This chapter describes the reliability of the City of Greenfield Water Supply. Water supply reliability addresses the capability of the water supply during emergency events in normal existing conditions, single dry years, and multiple dry years.

7.1 Constraints on Water Sources

7.2 Reliability by Type of Year

7.3 Supply and Demand Assessment

7.4 Water Supply Management Tools and Options

7.5 Drought Risk Assessment
Section 7.1 Constraints on Water Sources
The City’s only source of water is groundwater. The City is committed to providing the community a safe, reliable supply of excellent quality drinking water that meets or exceeds federal and state regulations and safe drinking water standards. The City has identified several potential constraints or disruption of the City’s water supplies from contamination, earthquakes, acts of terrorism, natural disaster, power outages, or mechanical system failure. This can impact the City’s access to a reliable water supply. 234
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 7-2

7.1.1 Supply Availability
The City of Greenfield obtains its municipal potable water supply from the Central Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin (SVGB) – Fore bay Aquifer Sub basin occupies the central portion of the Salinas Valley and extends from the town of Gonzales in the north to approximately three miles south of Greenfield.

Infiltration in the Salinas River channel is the principal source of groundwater recharge for the SVGB.

The recharge area is generally believed to end at a point between Chualar and the City of Salinas. Both natural runoff and conservation releases from Nacimiento and San Antonio Reservoirs contribute to the flow in the Salinas River. Infiltration from smaller tributaries that drain the highland areas also provides recharge to the groundwater basin. The down –valley movement of this subsurface water is essential to the containment of saltwater intrusion into the Pressure sub-area. Higher elevations tend to have little potential for groundwater recharge due to both shallow or non-existent soils and steep slopes.

Direct supply of potable water to the City is limited by existing and future planned water supply facilities, specifically the City’s three existing water wells (Well Nos. 1, 6, 7), and the planned future water well (Well No. 8). The three existing municipal wells, with the largest well out of service, can supply 2,500 gpm (4,000 AFY) of water to the City (reliably), which meets the City’s average day demand and maximum day demands. All three of the existing wells are equipped with emergency standby power for added reliability. Although this meets the City’s current needs, a future municipal well (Well No. 8) will be needed to reliably meet maximum daily demand in future years. This well is planned to be a 1500 gpm well, and assuming it operates 12 hours per day, this new well will be capable of producing an additional 1,200 AFY to the City’s customers, for a total of 5,200 AFY. These four wells in the future, and assuming the largest well out of service at any given time, will be able to supply the City’s future average day and maximum day demands.

California Water Code § 10631 (b)
Identify and quantify, to the extent practicable, the existing and planned sources of water available to the supplier over the same five-year increments described in subdivision (a), providing supporting and related information, including all of the following:

California Water Code § 10631 (b)(1)
A detailed discussion of anticipated supply availability under a normal water year, single dry year, and droughts lasting at least five years, as well as more frequent and severe periods of drought, as described in the drought risk assessment. For each source of water supply, consider any information pertinent to the reliability analysis conducted pursuant to Section 10635, including changes in supply due to climate change
California Water Code § 10635 (a)
Every urban water supplier shall include, as part of its urban water management plan, an assessment of the reliability of its water service to its customers during normal, dry, and multiple dry water years. This water supply and demand assessment shall compare the total water supply sources available to the water supplier with the long-term total projected water use over the next 20 years, in five-year increments, for a normal water year, a single dry water year, and a drought lasting five consecutive water years. The water service reliability assessment shall be based upon the information compiled pursuant to Section 10631, including available data from state, regional, or local agency population projections within the service area of the urban water supplier.
235
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 7-3

7.2 Reliability by Type of Year
This section discusses the type of years considered when evaluating water supply reliability (refer to Table 7-1). The conditions are as follows:
• Average Water Year – A term denoting the average annual hydrologic conditions based on an extended or existing period of record.
• Single Dry Year – The individual year with the lowest usable water supply. • Multiple Dry Years – Multiple dry years are defined as the three consecutive years with the lowest usable water supply.

Table 7-1 Bases of water Year Data
Year Type Base Year
Available Supplies if
Year Type Repeats
Quantification of available supplies
is not compatible with this table and
is provided elsewhere in the
UWMP.

Location
x
Quantification of available supplies
is provided in this table as either
volume only, percent only,
or both.

Volume
Availablea,b, d
Percentage of Available
Average Year 2005 4000 100%
Single – Dry Year 2012 4000 100%
Multiple Dry Year -1st year 2013 4000 100%
Multiple Dry Year -2nd year 2014 4000 100%
Multiple Dry Year -3rd yearc2015 4000 100%
Average 4000
Notes:
(a) Volumes are in units of AF.
(b) Available supply based on physical capability of City’s municipal water wells. Groundwater supply from which the City’s water wells extract water, is not constrained even during drought years. (c) In 2015 the City was in stage 3 water conservation per State requirements, thus significantly reducing demand during this year.
(d)Total groundwater supply is sufficient to meet current demand under average, single dry year, multiple dry year scenarios. City’s well water system is also capable of pumping/supplying sufficient water supply from the groundwater to meet City service area demands.

Identification of these dry year periods consistent with the UWMP Guidebook 2020 methodology is provided below. As previously mentioned, the City relies on ground water as the sole water supply source.

The City only pumps that water required to meet the City’s demand for all of its needs. 236
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 7-4
Figure 7-2 compares annual rainfall to the historic average (9.66 inches). The designation of Base Years for drought planning shown in Table 7-2 below comes from the data through the Prism Climate Group Historical Data. The analysis uses the historical period from 2001 to 2019.

Table 7-2 Total Inches of Rain per Year
Year Rain (inches) Year Rain (inches) Year Rain
(inches)
Year Rain (inches)
2001 14.26 2006 12.66 2011 10.05 2016 8.45
2002 9.14 2007 4.12 2012 10.42 2017 11.17
2003 8.80 2008 8.63 2013 1.45 2018 9.59
2004 12.26 2009 8.45 2014 9.82 2019 16.09
2005 11.03 2010 13.5 2015 5.98 2020 5.84
Details: http://www.prism.oregonstate.edu/documents/PRISM_datasets.pdf

7.3 Supply and Demand Assessment
To evaluate the water available to the City in any given year, the safe yield of the aquifer must be considered. More importantly, however, the physical capabilities of the City’s water wells to supply the municipal water demand must also be considered. The Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin (SVGB) is a regional resource that serves the majority of Monterey County. Annual usage varies with rainfall, but over the last decade groundwater use has ranged from 440,000 AFY to 527,000 AFY. Pumping from the Forebay Subarea accounts for only 28% of the total groundwater use from the SVGB. Agricultural irrigation accounts for 91.3% of SVGB water use, and 95% of the water use within the Forebay Subarea.

Urban use accounts for the remaining 5% to 7% of total water use. 237
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 7-5
Although a sustainable yield has not been estimated for the Forebay Subarea aquifer, this UWMP assumes an average usage rate of 466,103 acre-feet per year from all users – commercial, agricultural, and urban.

Given the Forebay Subarea aquifer storage capacity of 5,720,000 AF, the 2003 estimated in-ground ground water storage of 4,530,000 AF, and the relative lack of impact that drought conditions have on water availability within the Forebay Subarea aquifer, the total historical and projected water use from the Forebay Subarea aquifer is only a small percentage of the actual groundwater storage – approximately 3%. The City’s annual water extraction from this aquifer is only 4.74% of the actual extraction of groundwater . As evident from Tables 7-3, 7-4, and 7-5 below, the City’s projected water demand during the periods of normal, dry, and multiple dry years is only a small fraction of the amount of water available within the Forebay Subarea aquifer during any year, regardless of rainfall or drought conditions. However, as mentioned previously, the City’s access to this ample water supply is limited by the physical extraction capabilities of the City’s municipal water wells.

Table 7-3 Normal Year Supply and Demand Comparison
2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Supply Totala, b 4,000 4,000 5.200 5,200 5,200
Demand Totala2,167 2,427 2,755 3,049 3,319
Differencea1,833 1,573 2,455 2,151 2,151
Note:
(a) Volumes are in units of AF
(b)Water supply based on reliability of City municipal water wells.

Table 7-4 Single Dry Year Supply and Demand Comparison
2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Supply Totala, b 4,000 4,000 5.200 5,200 5,200
Demand Totala2,167 2,427 2,755 3,049 3,319
Differencea1,833 1,573 2,455 2,151 2,151
Note:
(a) Volumes are in units of AF
(b)Water supply based on reliability of City municipal water wells. 238
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 7-6
Table 7-5 Multiple Year Supply and Demand Comparisona
2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
First Year
Supply Total 4,000 4,000 5,200 5,200 5,200
Demand Total 2,167 2,427 2,755 3,049 3,319
Difference 1,833 1,573 2,455 2,151 1,881
Second Year Supply Total 4,000 4,000 5,200 5,200 5,200
Demand Total 2,167 2,427 2,755 3,049 3,319
Difference 1,833 1,573 2,455 2,151 1,881
Third Year Supply Total 4,000 4,000 5,200 5,200 5,200
Demand Total 2,167 2,427 2,755 3,049 3,319
Difference 1,833 1,573 2,455 2,151 1,881
Four Year Supply Total 4,000 4,000 5,200 5,200 5,200
Demand Total 2,167 2,427 2,755 3,049 3,319
Difference 1,833 1,573 2,455 2,151 1,881
Fifth Year Supply Total 4,000 4,000 5,200 5,200 5,200
Demand Total 2,167 2,427 2,755 3,049 3,319
Difference 1,833 1,573 2,455 2,151 1,881
Note:
(a) Volumes are in units of AF
(b)Demands are based on values presented in the 2020 WMP Update, which includes demands within City limits and accounting for recent annexations.

7.4 Water Supply Management Tools and Options
California Water Code § 10620 (f)
An urban water supplier shall describe in the plan water management tools and options used by that entity that will maximize resources and minimize the need to import water from other regions.

As discussed previously, the City uses groundwater as its sole source of supply and no known opportunities currently exist to diversifying sources of supply, with the exception of the potential to use recycled water (to augment potable water supply) in future years. To reduce the burden on groundwater resources during periods of prolonged drought, the City has a water conservation ordinance and water shortage contingency plan that is implemented to prevent and prohibit the wasting of water, while also encouraging the community to conserve.

To help protect the SVGB from overdraft, the City has joined the Water Awareness Committee of Monterey County (WAC). Through the WAC, representatives from several agencies throughout Monterey County work together coordinating conservation and other water awareness efforts including educational programs, information booths for special events and public understanding of Monterey County water challenges and opportunities.
239
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 7-7

7.5 Drought Risk Assessment
California Water Code § 10635 (b)
Every urban water supplier shall include, as part of its urban water management plan, a drought risk assessment for its water service to its customers as part of information considered in developing the demand management measures and water supply projects and programs to be included in the urban water management plan. The urban water supplier may conduct an interim update or updates to this drought risk assessment within the five year cycle of its urban water management plan update. The drought risk assessment shall include each of the following:
(1) A description of the data, methodology, and basis for one or more supply shortage conditions that are necessary to conduct a drought risk assessment for a drought period that lasts five consecutive water years,
starting from the year following when the assessment is conducted. (2) A determination of the reliability of each source of supply under a variety of water shortage conditions. This may include a determination that a particular source of water supply is fully reliable under most, if not all, conditions. (3) A comparison of the total water supply sources available to the water supplier with the total projected water use for the drought period.
(4) Considerations of the historical drought hydrology, plausible changes on projected supplies and demands under climate change conditions, anticipated regulatory changes, and other locally applicable criteria.

Projected total supplies and projected water use for the next five years (2021 to 2025) were compared and are presented in Table 7-6. The information in the table shows the available water supply based on the City’s municipal water wells, which will include the addition of one new well in the coming years to ensure ample water supply to accommodate the City’s future growth needs. The City intends to continue to use ground water as the sole source of potable water. The City’s projected extraction is equal to about

4.75% of the total extraction to the annual sustainable yield of the Forebay Subarea, which is estimated to be around 132,233 acre-feet in 2020. However, the City is always pursuing ways to decrease water usage and increase water savings. These items are described in Section 8 and Section 9 of this UWMP.

The City of Greenfield has a Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP) (Appendix D) to address any conditions resulting in water shortages (drought, system infrastructure outages, regulatory-imposed shortage restrictions, etc.). The WSCP identifies a variety of actions that the City will implement to reduce demands and further ensure supply reliability at various levels of water shortage. 240
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 7-8
Submittal Table 7-6: Five-Year Drought Risk Assessment Tables to address Water Code Section 10635(b)
2021 Total (AF)
Gross Water Use 1,971
Total Supply 4,000
Surplus/Shortfall w/o WSCP Action 2,029
Planned WSCP Actions (use reduction and supply augmentation) WSCP - supply augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
Resulting % Use Reduction from WSCP action 0
2022 Total (AF)
Gross Water Use 2,020
Total Supply 4,000
Surplus/Shortfall w/o WSCP Action 1,980
Planned WSCP Actions (use reduction and supply augmentation) WSCP - supply augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
Resulting % Use Reduction from WSCP action 0
2023 Total (AF)
Gross Water Use 2,069
Total Supply 5,200
Surplus/Shortfall w/o WSCP Action 3,131
Planned WSCP Actions (use reduction and supply augmentation) WSCP - supply augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
Resulting % Use Reduction from WSCP action 0
2024 Total (AF)
Gross Water Use 2,118
Total Supply 5,200
Surplus/Shortfall w/o WSCP Action 3,082
Planned WSCP Actions (use reduction and supply augmentation) WSCP - supply augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
Resulting % Use Reduction from WSCP action 0
241
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 7-9
2025 Total (AF)
Gross Water Use 2,167
Total Supply 5,200
Surplus/Shortfall w/o WSCP Action 3,033
Planned WSCP Actions (use reduction and supply augmentation) WSCP - supply augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
Resulting % Use Reduction from WSCP action 0
242
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 8-1
CHAPTER 8

WATER SHORTAGE CONTINGENCY PLANNING
California Water Code § 10640
Article 2 (commencing with Section 10630). The supplier shall likewise periodically review the plan as required by Section 10621, and any amendments or changes required as a result of that review shall be adopted pursuant to this article.
(b) Every urban water supplier required to prepare a water shortage contingency plan shall prepare a water shortage contingency plan pursuant to Section 10632. The supplier shall likewise periodically review the water shortage contingency plan as required by paragraph (10) of subdivision (a) of Section 10632 and any amendments or changes required as a result of that review shall be adopted pursuant to this article.

This chapter presents the plan elements DWR is requesting for updated Water Shortage Contingency Plans. The goal of having a standard plan template for all urban water supplier plans is to improve the readiness and response in addressing future water shortage conditions. DWR recommends that plans be updated on a regular basis (at least every UWMP cycle) to ensure effective implementation results in plan action is required.

Although this 2020 WSCP is a stand-alone document, it is still considered one of the elements of the 2020 UWMP, as required by State Law. The City Council adopted the 2020 WSCP, and this Plan is included in its entirety in Appendix D. It is noted that not all tables, figures and text from the WSCP are included in this Chapter. Refer to Appendix D for all information related to the City’s WSCP. Based on DWR requirements, and consistent with previous planning efforts, this WSCP includes the following sections:

8.1 Water Supply Reliability Analysis
The City relies exclusively on ground water to meet the City water demand. The City’s water supply infrastructure includes three (3) ground water wells varying in depth between 800 and 900 feet below ground surface, two (2) water storage tanks and two booster stations. These 3 wells supply all City customers with potable water for domestic use, and fire protection. Historically these wells have met customer demands through times of drought. Conditions could arise such as unforeseen impacts to the groundwater supply, mechanical failures to city infrastructure, power outages, water quality changes, water quality regulatory changes, and natural disasters that could require the activation of the WSCP.

The City of Greenfield obtains its municipal potable water supply from the Central Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin (SVGB) – Fore bay Aquifer Sub basin occupies the central portion of the Salinas Valley and extends from the City of Gonzales to the north to approximately three miles south of Greenfield (see Figure 1) (per Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin, 180/400 Foot Aquifer Subbasin Bulletin 118.).

Agencies that are dependent on surface waters will generally see more immediate and lasting supply impacts from short-term fluctuations in hydrology i.e., drought conditions. The City of Greenfield’s water supply comes from underlying groundwater pumped from the SVGB. City of Greenfield water supply availability from this basin has not historically varied due to short-term hydrological conditions, and as mentioned 243
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 8-2
previously, the City’s water supply is directly dependent on the physical capabilities and reliability of the City’s water wells to extract potable water from the SVGB. The minimum water supply available within the driest three-year sequence is expected to match demands as discussed in the Urban Water Management Plan.

8.2 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment Procedures Beginning by July 1, 2022, each Supplier shall prepare their annual water supply and demand assessment (referred as an Annual Assessment) and submit an Annual Water Shortage Assessment Report (AWSAR) to DWR. The Annual Water Shortage Assessment Report will be due by July 1 of every year, as required by Water Code Section 10632.1. The Annual Assessment and associated reporting are to be conducted based on the Supplier’s procedures detailed in the WSCP.

DWR is developing a stand-alone guidance document that will recommend practical procedures and analytical methods that may be used, at the Supplier’s discretion, to comply with the Annual Assessment requirement effectively and efficiently.

As required by Water Code Section 10632(a), the Supplier’s WSCP shall include its specific procedures— akin to an instruction manual— that describe annual steps and timing to complete the Annual Assessment, such that it can be consistently followed year-after-year, regardless of changing Supplier staff undertaking the steps.

The city relies solely on groundwater to meet the City water supply. The City currently relies on three (3) groundwater wells varying in depth between 800 and 900 feet below ground surface. Historically, these wells have met customer demands through times of drought. Conditions could arise such as unforeseen impacts to the groundwater supply, mechanical failures to city infrastructure and natural disasters that could require the activation of the WSCP. The City recently updated the 2020 WMP, and the reliability of the City’s water wells was evaluated in this WMP. The City’s reliable water supply, based on the largest well being out of service, is 4,000 AF per year. Moving forward, as the City’s demands grow, the WMP recommended that at least one new municipal well be provided to ensure the City can reliability meet future water demands of the City.

The City groundwater is part of the Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin (SVGB) – Forebay Aquifer. This Subbasin occupies the central portion of the Salinas Valley and extends from the City of Gonzales to the north to approximately three miles south of Greenfield. The City of Greenfield relies solely on groundwater pumped from the large Forebay Subbasin. Thus, the City of Greenfield water supply availability from this groundwater basin has not historically varied due to short-term hydrological conditions. The minimum water supply available within the driest three-year sequence is expected to match existing and future demands as discussed in the Urban Water Management Plan.

The Forebay is currently the most important source of water for the City of Greenfield. In 2020, the City groundwater withdrawals of 626,182,000 gallons of water (1921.7 ac-ft.) accounted for less than five percent (4.75%) of the estimated sub basin-wide annual extractions of roughly 132,233 + acre-feet/ Given this relatively small percentage, the City of Greenfield’s conservation and contingency management activities can play only a small part within the Forebay 2020 Ground Water Extraction Summary Report from the Monterey county Resource Agency.

The foremost concern in developing appropriate triggers is achieving the maximum practical protection of an adequate long-term water supply of acceptable quality for City of Greenfield customers. To that end, triggering mechanisms should be tied to factors that, directly or indirectly, have the greatest potential effect on the quality and quantity of available groundwater.
244
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 8-3
The four general types of threats that could cause the City of Greenfield to experience water shortages are as follows:
a. Unanticipated catastrophic system failure, such as earthquake, terrorist attack or sudden contamination of the water supply;’ or
b. Chronic system shortage due to lack of maintenance on the water wells such that those wells would have to be removed from service for extended periods of time; or c. A severe drought condition resulting in the groundwater table dropping below the pumping level; or any water quality that would impacts to drinking water.

In case of a catastrophic failure, the City of Greenfield would assess the nature and extent of the failure. The Public Works Director and /or City Manager would identify the appropriate Water Contingency Plan Stage in accordance with the Emergency Response Plan (ERP), including enacting Extreme Shortage Stage 6 Emergency, if required.

The application of fertilizers to agricultural fields in the Salinas Valley have contributed to wide-spread contamination (due to nitrates) of underlying groundwater supplies, which poses a continued and extensive system threat. The City’s municipal water supply is in compliance with all state and federal primary drinking water standards.

The City of Greenfield has structured this WSCP to dove-tail with the City’s Mandatory Water Conservation Regulations (Chapter 13.09, City Municipal Code), with the primary goal of significantly reducing water supply demands during times of drought and/or low water supply availability, including allowing time for alternative water supply measures, including treatment or drilling of alternate wells.

8.3 Shortage Response Levels
Per California Water Code Section 10632(a)(3), updated 2020, a WSCP must include at least six water shortage stages and cover a possible reduction in supply of more than 50 percent. The 2020 WSCP updates the City’s previous 2014 WSCP and Water Conservation Ordinance which included five stages. The stages are determined and recommended by the Public Works Director who assesses severity and anticipated duration of the water supply shortage. The Public Works Director presents the recommended shortage severity stage, for approval and declaration by City Council. The 2014 Greenfield Water Contingency 5 stages will be readdressed as six stages as required with this update. Table 8-2 is a cross walk from the 2014 plan to New DWR six stages. The new stages determined by the percent water supply shortage are summarized in Table 8-3.
245
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 8-4
Table 8-2: Cross walk from the 2014 Plan to New 2020 DWR Six Stages 246
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 8-5
Table 8-3: Stages of Water Shortage Contingency Plan
Stage Percentage
Supply Shortage
Severity Water Supply Conditions
1 Up to 10%
Potential
Shortage
(Voluntary)
Annual Assessment
2 Up to -20% Minor Shortage
(Voluntary) System malfunction (Booster Pump Station)
3 Up to -30%
Moderate
Shortage
(Mandatory)
Water loss during production resulting from
failure of one (1) well (maintenance or repairs)
4 Up to -40% Severe Shortage
(Mandatory)
System malfunction and water loss during
production resulting from failure of one (1)
well.
5 Up to-50%
Critical
Shortage
(Mandatory)

1.System Malfunction or loss of water
production resulting from loss of two (2) wells
(maintenance or repairs)
6 >50%
Extreme
Shortage
(Mandatory)

1.System Malfunction or extreme loss of water
production.
247
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 8-6

8.4 Shortage Response Actions

8.4.1 Supply Augmentation
The City currently relies on groundwater to meet demand requirements within the service area and there are no known opportunities for water supply augmentation through actions such as exchanges, transfers, or purchase programs. Therefore, supply augmentation actions are excluded from the City’s WSCP at this time. The City’s current storage tanks could supply water for several days of demand in the event of a catastrophic event. The City’s Water Master Plan recommended enough water storage to supply each resident with 50 gallons per person per day, for a total of three consecutive days, to provide enough potable water for sanitary purposes in the event of a catastrophic or emergency event that restricts water production.

8.4.2 Demand Reduction
The City of Greenfield Municipal Ordinance Title 13 Utilities Services, Chapter 13.09, Mandatory Water Conservation Regulations, were enacted to address the City’s authority to mandate water conservation during times of water supply shortages. The purpose of this Chapter is to increase public awareness of the need for water conservation; to provide regulations and restrictions on the delivery of water and the consumption within the City limits; to give the City authority to enforce mandatory restrictions on water wasting/usage including levying of penalties for noncompliance, and water rate hikes to strongly encourage conservation. City staff will mandate water conservation for the protection of public health and safety, as follows: 1) conserve water supply for the greatest public benefit with particular regard to domestic use, sanitation, and fire protection, and 2) ensure compliance with water regulations of other governmental agencies of appropriate jurisdiction including the State Division of Drinking Water (DDW). The following is an abbreviated list of permanent best management practices (BMPs) from the Ordinance;
a) Repair of Plumbing, Sprinkler, and Irrigation Systems. b) Washing of Vehicles: No person shall use a water hose to wash any car, truck, boat, trailer, bus, recreational vehicle, camper, aircraft, tractor, or any other vehicle, or any portion thereof, with potable water, unless the hose is equipped with an automatic shutoff nozzle. c) Cleaning of Structures: No person shall use potable water through a hose to clean the exterior of any building or structure unless such hose is equipped with a shutoff nozzle. d) Cleaning of Surfaces: No person shall use potable water through a hose to clean any sidewalk, driveway, roadway, parking lot, or any other outdoor paved or hard surfaced area, except where necessary to protect public health and safety.
e) Water Spillage: No person shall cause, suffer, or permit water to spill into streets, curbs, or gutters.

8.4.3 Operational Changes
During a water shortage, changes to water system operations may be considered. These operational changes may include improving water usage consumption and tracking, changes to fire hydrant testing frequencies, reducing, or halting line flushing during water shortage conditions, alteration in maintenance cycles, and expediting water leak repairs.

Stage 1: Up to 10% - Potential Shortage– Volunteer Conservation 248
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 8-7
• Voluntary water conservation requested of all customers Adhere to Chapter 13.09 Mandatory Water Conservation Regulations (Appendix A)
• Recommending that Landscape irrigation be limited to early morning and late evening • Discourage non-essential water uses (cleaning of structures and/or surfaces) • Require shutoff nozzles on all hoses.
• Encourage conversion to drip, low volume irrigation.
• Notify all customers of the water shortage.
• Provide technical information to customers on ways to improve water use efficiency. • Campaign to remind consumers of the need to save water and restrict all landscape irrigation to certain hours of the day.

Stage Type of Use Restrictions
Reduce
Shortage
Gap
Penalty,
Charge or
Other
Enforcement?
1 Outdoor
washing of cars,
buildings, and
surfaces
Encourage shutoff nozzles on all
hoses used.
1 %
No
1 Landscape ‐
Other landscape
restriction or
prohibition
The application of potable water
to outdoor landscapes during and
up to within 48 hours after
measurable rainfall.
1 %
No
1 Landscape
irrigation to
specific
times
Landscape irrigation before 11 am
and after 6 pm is encouraged.
1 %
No
249
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 8-8
Stage 2: up to 20% - Minor Shortage – Volunteer Conservation All recommended measures of Stage 1 remain in effect. Additional recommendations include:
• Expanding Water Conservation efforts
• Intensify public information campaign
• Encourage limiting landscape irrigation to specified times. • Send direct notices to all customers via customer water bills • Prohibit exterior washing of structures
• Dining establishments are not to serve water unless requested Stage Type of Use Restrictions
Reduce
Shortage
Gap
Penalty
2 Landscape ‐ Other
landscape
restriction or
prohibition
Landscape irrigation after 11 am
and before 6 pm is not
recommended
2% No
2 Exterior washing
of structures
Encourage customers to refrain
from exterior washing of structures
Except for health and safety
2% No
2 Dining
establishments/hum
an consumption
Serve water at dining
establishments only upon request
1% No
250
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 8-9
Stage 3: up to 30% Moderate Shortage (Mandatory Conservation) Conservation measures shall be called for because of malfunction of any portion of the water system that reduces supplies by up to 30% on a daily, peak seasonal or annual basis. It also may be called due to prolonged drought conditions and a need to focus public attention on water conservation methods. All requirements of Stages 1 and 2 become mandatory restrictions.

Enforcement procedures and penalties for wasting water are enforced as described in the Greenfield Water Conservation Ordinance Sections 13.09.040 and 13.09.060.

Stage Type of Use Restrictions
Reduce
Shortage
Gap
Penalty
3 Existing
Landscapes,
including Public
Parks
Landscape watering with potable water
shall be subject to the following
restrictions:
1) Landscape watering using sprinklers or
irrigation systems is permitted only two
days per week. Addresses ending in even
numbers (0, 2, 4, 6, 8,) may water on
Mondays and Thursdays.
2) Addresses ending in odd numbers (1, 3, 5,
7, and 9) may water on Tuesdays and
Fridays. If there is no street address, or if
more than one street address is associated
with a contiguous property, the irrigation
days are Wednesday and Saturday.
.
5% Yes
3 New
Landscaping
Irrigation
Landscape watering with potable water
shall be subject to the following
restrictions:
1) Landscape watering is permitted to
maintain adequate growth on newly
installed landscapes, for a period generally
up to five (5) weeks. Property owners must
notify the Utilities Division of the address
where new landscape is installed and the
date of installation.
2) Following the initial establishment
period, landscape watering using a
sprinkler or irrigation system is permitted
only on days associated with the current
conservation stage in effect.
5% Yes
3 Hotels, motels
and bed and
breakfasts
Hotels, Motels and B&Bs must offer and
clearly notify guests of a “limited
linen/towel exchange” program.
5% Yes
251
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 8-10
3 Swimming
pools, hot tubs
Initial filling of new and existing swimming
pools is prohibited. Draining and refilling
existing swimming pools is permitted only if
repairing a pool leak or repairing,
maintaining or replacing a pool component
that has become hazardous. All pools and
tubs shall be covered when not in use to
reduce evaporation.
5% Yes
3 Industrial
and
Commercial
Reduction of water use by any means is
required d. Compliance with
mandatory demand reduction measures
is required for outdoor water uses
including landscape irrigation,
swimming pools, and vehicle washing.
5% Yes
3 Vehicle and
Equipment
Washing
Non-commercial washing of vehicles and
mobile equipment (e.g., washing a vehicle at
a residence) is permitted only on assigned
landscape watering days during landscape
watering hours (before 11:00 a.m. or after
6:00 p.m.).

Fleet managers are required to only wash
those vehicles as is necessary for health and
safety.
5% Yes
3 Construction The use of potable water for dust control shall be reduced to the greatest extent
possible.
5% Yes
Stage 4. Up to 40 % Severe Shortage (Mandatory Conservation) Stage 4 Mandatory Conservation measures will be called for because of malfunction of any portion of the water system that reduces supplies by up to 40% on a daily, peak seasonal or annual basis. It also may be called due to prolonged drought conditions and a need to focus public attention on water conservation.

Enforcement procedures and penalties for water wasting continues as described in the Greenfield Water Conservation Ordinance Sections 13.09.040 and 13.09.060. 252
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 8-11
Stage Type of use Restrictions
Reduce
Shortage
Gap
Penalty
4 Existing
Landscapes,
including Public
Parks
Landscape watering using sprinkler
or irrigation systems is permitted
only one day per week.
1) Addresses ending in numbers 0
or 1 may water on Mondays.
2) Addresses ending in numbers 2
or 3 may water on Tuesdays.
3) Addresses ending in numbers 4
or 5 may water on Wednesdays.
4) Addresses ending in numbers 6
or 7 may water on Thursdays.
5) Addresses ending in numbers 8
or 9 may water on Fridays.
6) If there is no street address, or if
more than one street address is
associated with a contiguous property,
the irrigation day is Wednesday.
7) No irrigation is allowed on
Saturdays or Sundays?
Manual landscape watering with a
soaker hose, handheld hose or
watering can/bucket is allowed on any
day.

Up to
20%
Yes
4 New
landscaping
Irrigation
Landscape watering with potable
water shall be subject to the
following restrictions:
1) Landscape watering is permitted
three
(3) days a week to maintain adequate
growth on newly installed landscapes,
for a period generally up to five (5)
weeks. Watering days for new
landscapes are Tuesday, Thursday and
Saturday. Property owners must notify
the Utilities Division of the address
where new landscape is installed and
the date of installation.
2) Following the initial establishment
period, landscape watering using a
sprinkler or irrigation system is
permitted only on a single day per
week based on address.

Up to
20%
Yes
253
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 8-12
4 Hotels, motels
and bed and
breakfasts
Hotels, Motels and B&Bs must limit
linen/towel exchange to once every two
(2) nights or for the entire stay,
whichever is shorter, except for
health and safety program
Up to
20%
Yes
4 Swimming
pools, hot
tubs
Initially filling new and existing
swimming pools prohibited. Draining
and refilling existing swimming pools
are not permitted after making repairs
on pool leak or repairing, maintaining
or replacing a pool component that has
become hazardous. All pools and tubs
shall be covered when not in use to
reduce evaporation
Up to
20%
Yes
4 Industrial
and
Commerci
al
Compliance with mandatory demand
reduction measures is required for
outdoor water uses including
landscape irrigation,.

Up to
20%
Yes
4 Construction The use of potable water for dust
control shall be prohibited during this
stage..

The City may establish mandatory
construction water budgets, if
needed
Up to
20%
Yes
Stage 5. Critical Shortage (Mandatory Rationing)
Appropriate 50% water shortage allotments shall be calculated, and customers noticed of the ration volume/quantity per person. Appropriate administration and enforcement of this stringent program shall be the highest priority of the Utilities Division activity. Water rates may be further increased by the City Council, as a means of enforcing mandatory rationing during Stage 5 water shortages.

Enforcement procedures and penalties for water wasting continues as described in the Greenfield Water Conservation Ordinance Sections 13.09.040 and 13.09.060. 254
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 8-13
Stage Type of use Restrictions
Reduce
Shortage
Gap
Penalty
5 Existing
Landscapes,
including
Public Parks
Landscape watering with
potable water is
prohibited
Up to
40%
Yes
5 New
landscaping
Irrigation
.

The installation of new
landscapes to be irrigated with
potable water is prohibited.

No landscape shall be installed
during declaration of
Conservation Stage 5
Up to
30%
Yes
5 Hotels, motels
and bed and
breakfasts
Hotels, Motels, and B&Bs must
limit linen/towel exchange to
once every three (3) nights or
for the entire stay, whichever is
shorter,
Up to
30%
Yes
5 Swimming
pools, hot tubs
Filling new and existing
swimming pools and/or draining
and refilling existing swimming
pools is prohibited. All pools and
tubs shall be covered when not in
use to reduce evaporation.

Contact Utilities Division staff if
an existing swimming pool must
be repaired and refilled during
Conservation Stage 5.

Up to
30%
Yes
5 Industrial
and
Commercial
Reduction of water use by any
means is required . The City
Council may establish
mandatory use reduction
targets, if needed.

Compliance with mandatory
demand reduction measures is
required for outdoor water uses
including landscape irrigation,
swimming pools, and vehicle
washing.

Up to
30%
Yes
255
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 8-14
5 Vehicle and
Equipment
Washing
The use of potable water for
dust control shall be reduced to
the greatest extent possible.

The City may establish
mandatory construction water
budgets, if
needed.

Up to
30%
Yes
5 Water Rates Raise water rates to strongly
encourage water conservation
in households.
? Yes
Stage 6: Extreme Shortage (Mandatory Rationing)
During Stage 6, the water supply shortage is over 50 percent and a greater reduction in water usage is required for the City to meet the immediate needs of its customers. The City continues its public information and education programs and urges customers to achieve a 50 percent or greater mandatory water use reduction. Water rate hikes for higher water use will need to be employed during this time, to further promote strict water conservation measures City-wide.

A special City Council meeting may be called to determine if Mandatory Rationing is necessary to further reduce water used. All previous requirements of Stages 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 remain in effect.

Additional requirements may include:

Enforcement procedures and penalties for water wasting continue as described in the Greenfield Water Conservation Ordinance Sections 13.09.040 and 13.09.060.

Stage Type of use Restrictions
Reduce
Shortage
Gap
Penalty,
Charge or
Other
Enforcement?
6 Other Non-essential use of water prohibited. Up to 40% Yes 6 Other
Per Capita Allotment by customer
type. Water rates structured to
highly encourage strict water
conservation in households.

Up to 40% Yes

8.4.4 Additional Mandatory Restrictions
Additional mandatory restrictions may be imposed by City Council. 256
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 8-15

8.5 Emergency Response Plan
The Water Code Section 10632(c) requires development of an Emergency Response Plan documenting actions to be undertaken by the water supplier to prepare for and implement during a catastrophic interruption of water supplies. The City is currently in the process of updating its Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), most recently updated in 2004, that provides a framework for the City to address a catastrophic supply interruption due to various hazards, including seismic, geological, wildfire, and flooding hazards.

This plan is intended to define the actions required of the City before, during, and after an emergency. The City will develop an ERP, which includes appropriate personnel listings, resource inventories, locations for emergency operations centers, response procedures, and the steps necessary to resume normal operations.

It also guides the City’s response to major emergencies and disasters.

The City maintains a preventative maintenance program for its distribution system. Auxiliary generators are available at each water facility site to minimize loss of these facilities during an earthquake or any disaster causing an electric power outage. Permanent generators are provided at all sites with water supply wells/pumps and booster pump stations.

8.6 Seismic Risk Assessment and Mitigation Plan
Seismic Risk was assessed in the City’s America’s Water Infrastructure Act Risk and Resilience Assessment (Wallace Group, 2021). The Risk and Resilience Assessment states the City is located within the Central Coast which is a relatively moderate to high seismically active area. The City is located within the Rinconada Fault Zone. Seismic hazards are dependent on the distance to the fault and the intensity and magnitude of the seismic event. Based on the City’s location, seismic activity is a major threat to the water system. While it is expected that the City will experience some seismic activity, the risk of catastrophic damage to the water system (including the City’s wells and storage tanks) is moderate to low. Therefore, seismic risk does appear to be a high consequence risk or high likelihood event.

8.7 Communication Protocols
When the City plans for short-term water use reduction as directed by the Water Shortage Contingency Plan or Annual Assessment, clear and effective communication will be critical to achieve the necessary demand reductions. Methods of public notification include Facebook, twitter, bill inserts, City website announcements, social media posts, and press releases or informational campaigns. These public notification methods would be implemented in the event of a Stage 2 Minor Water Shortage and would increase in frequency in the event of a Stage 3 and higher Water Shortage.

8.8 Compliance and Enforcement
In order to encourage cooperative efforts to achieve water conservation, it shall be the policy of the City to have verbal communication with the public, when an alleged violation is first noted. Such warning shall include an explanation of the violation.

Chapter 13.09.050 of the Municipal Code provides for a system for issuing warnings and to correct the violation. Subsequently, in accordance with Chapter 13.09.060, any violation that occurs or continues from one day to the next shall be deemed a separate violation, for each day during which such violation occurs or continues to occur. The fine for a first violation of this chapter shall be fifty dollars ($50.00). The fine for a second violation and each subsequent violation of this chapter within a period of twelve (12) months, regardless of the specific section or subsection violated, shall be one hundred dollars ($100.00). 257
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 8-16

8.9 Legal Authorities
The City’s legal authority to mandate water conservation is contained in Municipal Ordinance Chapter

13.09, “Mandatory Water Conservation Regulations:

8.5.1.1 “The Public Works Director shall develop and implement any programs, plans, directives, and regulations necessary for such compliance, including, but not limited to, any water shortage contingency plan or other plan or program adopted by the city pursuant to any federal, state, or county agency or regulatory authority requirement.”

8.5.1.2 Implementation of the Water Shortage Contingency Plan and its stages shall be determined by the Public Works Director. Shortage response actions that are implemented shall be enforced and violations imposed by the City staff. In accordance with Water Code Division 1, Section 350, the City shall declare a water shortage emergency when water supply conditions reach a supply reduction of 10 percent (Stage 1) or greater. The City does not provide water supply to any other city. The City could coordinate with Monterey County for the possible proclamation of a local water supply emergency per California Government Code, California Emergency Services Act, Article 2, Section 8558.

8.10 Financial Consequences of WSCP Activation
The City has established an accounting system for tracking expenses and revenue shortfalls associated with voluntary and mandatory water use reductions implemented through WSCP implementation actions. The City maintains reserve funds that can be used to offset expenditure impacts during times of emergency.

Further, the City Manager (and City Council) could implement a Water Surcharge upon triggering of a WSCP declaration to recover unmitigated revenue shortfalls resulting from the costs of additional water shortage response measures and actions. The water surcharge would only be in effect during the declared water shortage condition. Any water related surcharges would be approved by the City Council, validating the need for the surcharges, and identifying appropriate costs to be covered through any approved surcharges to support WSCP implementation.

8.11 Monitoring and Reporting
The City records daily water production and monthly metered usage throughout the year. Daily production figures are reported monthly to the State Water Resources Control Board (Water Board) Office of Research, Planning, and Performance ([email protected]) and in the Annual Report to the Drinking Water Program, which is submitted to the Water Board Division of Drinking Water (DDW) each year.

The City will track water production and meter data closely to determine the actual water savings made during each stage and use this information to calculate water savings. By monitoring the water savings, the City can adjust its response to the water shortage for each water user class and how this will affect the water shortages stages.

8.12 WSCP Refinement Procedures
Based on analysis of the data collected, the City may choose to modify or add consumption reduction methods to more effectively meet water level targets. The City’s WSCP can be refined and updated at any time, independent of when UWMPs are updated every five years. 258
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 8-17
Any updates to the WSCP will be approved by the City Council as needed to maintain an effective water shortage response plan for the community. Any WSCP updates will allow for stakeholder review and be publicly noticed before any City Council action is considered at a City Council meeting. The WSCP documents and any updated information will be available on the City’s website.

8.13 Special Water Feature Distinction
The City does not currently have any special water features of distinction that would be involved in a WSCP response effort.

8.14 Plan Adoption, Submittal, and Availability
The WSCP adoption and submittal process, as well as the public availability, are the same as those for the City’s UWMP. However, the WSCP may be periodically amended independently from the City’s UWMP.

Should an amendment to the WSCP be implemented, stakeholder and public notification methods consistent with the UWMP will be performed prior to adoption of the amended plan. 259
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 9-1
CHAPTER 9

DEMAND MANAGEMENT MEASURES
The City of Greenfield supports the ongoing efforts implemented by local stakeholders in water conservation, public education, and outreach. This chapter contains the following sections:

9.1 Demand Management Measures (DMMs) for Wholesale Suppliers

9.2 Demand Management Measures for Retail Suppliers

9.3 Planned Implementation to Achieve Water Use Targets

9.4 Water Use Objectives (Future Requirements)

9.1 Demand Management Measures for Wholesale Suppliers
The City is a retail supplier, and as such this Section of the UWMP does not apply to the City of Greenfield.

9.2 Demand Management Measures for Retail Suppliers
Water Code Section 10631
(e)Provide a description of the supplier’s water demand management measures. This description shall include all of the following:
(1)(A) For an urban retail water supplier, as defined in Section 10608.12, a narrative description that addresses the nature and extent of each water demand management measure implemented over the past five years. The narrative shall describe the water demand management measure that the supplier plans to implement to achieve its water use targets pursuant to Section 10608.20.
(B) The narrative pursuant to this paragraph shall include descriptions of the following water demand management measures:

1. Water waste prevention ordinances.

2. Metering.

3. Conservation pricing.

4. Public education and outreach.

5. Programs to assess and manage distribution system real loss.

6. Water conservation program coordination and staffing support.

7. Other demand management measures that have a significant impact on water use as measured in gallons per capita per day, including innovative measures, if implemented. 260
City of Greenfield
2020 Urban Water Management Plan 9-2

9.2.1 Water Waste Prevention Ordinances
In 1950 the City adopted section 13.12.030 of the municipal code that simply stated: “no consumer shall knowingly permit leaks or waste of water.” In 1995 the City adopted a comprehensive mandatory water conservation ordinance, chapter 13.09 of the municipal code. This ordinance is in place at all times and is not dependent upon a water shortage for implementation. In 2014 the City supplemented the mandatory prohibitions of the ordinance with the adoption of the Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP). This WSCP was summarized in Chapter 8, and is included in Appendix D.

In September 2009, the state adopted the Water Conservation in Landscaping Act of 2006 (AB 1881). As of January 1, 2010, all local jurisdictions in California are required to implement this law, with the aim of reducing water consumption by landscaping. Governor Brown’s Drought Executive Order of April 1, 2015 (EO B-29-15) directed DWR to update the State’s Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) through expedited regulation.

The California Water Commission approved the revised MWELO Ordinance on July 15, 2015. The state Department of Water Resources (DWR) has prepared a Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) for use by local jurisdictions to ensure a reduction of water waste and to stretch the state’s limited water supplies. Jurisdictions have a choice to adopt a local ordinance which is “at least as effective as” the MWELO, or to apply the MWELO.

← All documents from this meeting