Cities Index.
Agenda, regular meeting

Gridley City Council
October 21, 2024

Document
Agenda, regular meeting
Meeting
October 21, 2024
Body
Gridley City Council
Original file
2.8 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on www.gridleyca.gov. That file is the official record.

GRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA: Regular Meeting of 10-21-24 Page 1 of 3 “Our purpose is to continuously enhance our community’s vitality and overall quality of life. We are committed to providing high quality, cost-effective municipal services and forming productive partnerships with our residents and regional organizations. We collectively develop, share, and are guided by a clear vision, values, and meaningful objectives.” The Public is encouraged to attend and participate in person. Comments from the public on agenda items will be accepted until 4 pm on October 21st, 2024, via email to [email protected] or via the payment/document drop box at Gridley City Hall and will be conveyed to the Council for consideration.

You may view using the following link, ID, and passcode:
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/85280113392?pwd=1hMdmjgTOgoXOWWc2yWQGlWogYJaxK.1 Webinar ID: 852 8011 3392
Passcode: 581705
Or Telephone:
+1 669 444 9171 US
+1 719 359 4580 US
CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Farr

ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Councilmember Roberts
PROCLAMATION – None
INTRODUCTION OF NEW OR PROMOTED EMPLOYEES - None
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION FORUM - Members of the public may address the City Council on matters not listed on the agenda. The City Council may not discuss nor take action on any community participation item brought forward by a member of the community. Comments are requested to be limited to three (3) minutes.

CONSENT AGENDA

1. City Council Minutes Review
City Council Meeting Minutes Dated October 7th, 2024
Recommended Action(s):

Gridley City Council – Regular Meeting Agenda
Monday October 21, 2024; 6:00 pm
Gridley City Hall, 685 Kentucky Street, Gridley, CA 95948 GRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA: Regular Meeting of 10-21-24 Page 2 of 3 a. Approve the October 7th, 2024, regular Council meeting minutes

2. Power Content Label
Review of the 2023 Power Source Disclosure Content Label Recommended Action(s):
a. Approve 2024-R-039: A Resolution of The City Council of The City of Gridley Approving the Attestation of Veracity of the 2023 Power Source Disclosure Report, the 2023 Power Content Label and Submission of The Report to The California Energy Commission

ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION

3. Fire Department Grant Cost Share
Council consideration of participation in the Cal Fire 2024 Volunteer Fire Capacity Grant Program for the purchase of Personal Protective Equipment for Volunteer Firefighters Recommended Action(s):
a. Approve Resolution 2024-R-040: Authorizing the City of Gridley Fire Department to accept the Volunteer Fire Capacity Grant
b. Approve the City’s cost share, with an amount not to exceed $4,878

4. Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
Review and Adoption of the 2024 Butte County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan to help reduce long-term risks to people, property and other community assets from future hazards and natural disasters
Recommended Action(s):
a. Approve 2024-R-041: A Resolution of the City of Gridley Adopting the 2024 Butte County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan

5. Task Order for Construction Management
Review of the task order that authorizes 4Leaf, Inc. to provide construction inspection services on behalf of the City, in coordination with Gridley Public Works and Caltrans, as needed for the State Route 99 Waterline Relocation Project Recommended Action(s):
a. Authorize City Administrator to execute a task order with 4Leaf, Inc. in the amount of $113,867 and a budget of $125,000

6. Cash Investment Policy
Council to review and consider the adoption of the City Cash Investment Policy GRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA: Regular Meeting of 10-21-24 Page 3 of 3 Recommended Action(s):
a. Review and adopt the City of Gridley Cash Investment Policy

7. Compensation Agreements
Council to review the Taxing Agency Compensation Agreements for the former Redevelopment Agency Property Sales for the lots at the Industrial Park Recommended Action(s):
a. Approve the attached “form of” templates of Taxing Agency Compensation Agreements
b. Authorize City Staff to negotiate with taxing agencies that receive a share of sale proceeds from former City of Gridley Redevelopment Agency property sales based on the terms in the agreements
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS - Brief reports on conferences, seminars, and meetings attended by the Mayor and City Council members, if any.

CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORTS - Brief updates and reports on conferences, seminars, and meetings attended by the City Administrator, if any.

DEPARTMENT UPDATE REPORTS – Brief updates and reports on conferences, seminars, and meetings attended by Department Managers, if any
POTENTIAL FUTURE CITY COUNCIL ITEMS - (Appearing on the Agenda within 30 days):

Procurement Policy 11/4/2024
Travel Policy 11/4/2024
Energy Efficiency Contract Review 11/4/2024
CLOSED SESSION - None
ADJOURNMENT – adjourning to a regular meeting on November 4th, 2024.

NOTE 1: POSTING OF AGENDA- This agenda was posted on the public bulletin board at City Hall at or before 6:00 p.m., October 18th, 2024. This agenda along with all attachments is available for public viewing online at www.gridley.ca.us and at the Administration Counter in City Hall, 685 Kentucky Street, Gridley, CA.

NOTE 2: REGARDING UNSCHEDULED MATTERS – In accordance with state law, it shall be the policy of this Council that no action shall be taken on any item presented during the public forum or on unscheduled matters unless the Council, by majority vote, determines that an emergency situation exists, or, unless the Council by a two-thirds vote finds that the need to take action arose subsequent to the posting of this agenda.

GRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: Regular Meeting of 10-7-24 Page 1 of 6 “Our purpose is to continuously enhance our community’s vitality and overall quality of life. We are committed to providing high quality, cost-effective municipal services and forming productive partnerships with our residents and regional organizations. We collectively develop, share, and are guided by a clear vision, values, and meaningful objectives.”

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farr called the meeting to order at 6:00 pm.

ROLL CALL

Present: Farr, Johnson, Roberts, Sanchez, Calderon

Absent: None
Arriving after roll call: None
Staff Present: Elisa Arteaga, City Administrator
Todd Farr, Police Chief
Tony Galyean, City Attorney
Martin Pineda, Finance Director
Ross Pippitt, Utility Director
Chip Fowler, Fire Chief

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilmember Calderon led the Pledge of Allegiance.

PROCLAMATION – None

INTRODUCTION OF NEW OR PROMOTED EMPLOYEES
City Administrator Elisa Arteaga introduced Pamela Roberts, Administrative Secretary and Amanda Kaelin, Recreation Coordinator to Council.

Police Chief Todd Farr introduced the newly promoted Police Lieutenant, Jason Garringer.

COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION FORUM
Brenda Narayan, PG&E Government Affairs Representative, spoke to Council to introduce herself as the City’s primary contact for local emergencies.

CONSENT AGENDA

1. City Council Minutes Review
Gridley City Council – Regular Meeting Minutes
Monday October 7, 2024; 6:00 pm
Gridley City Hall, 685 Kentucky Street, Gridley, CA 95948 GRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: Regular Meeting of 10-7-24 Page 2 of 6 City Council Meeting Minutes Dated September 16th, 2024 Recommended Action(s):
a. Approve the September 16th, 2024 regular Council meeting minutes

2. City Contribution
Review Requested GIBT Donation
Recommended Action(s):
b. Approve the request from the G.I.B.T. for financial support for the 2024 tournament in the amount of $1,500

ROLL CALL
Motion: Roberts
Second: Calderon
Action: to approve consent agenda as presented.

Ayes: Roberts, Farr, Sanchez, Calderon
Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: Johnson
Motion passed, 4-0-1

ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION

3. City Abatement of Property
Verbal Update by City Attorney on Progress of Health and Safety Code Receiverships concerning 110 Virginia Street and 390 Virginia Street
Recommended Action(s):
a. Receive report from City Attorney
City Attorney Tony Galyean provided Council with a verbal update on the two health and safety code receiverships. Galyean explained that 390 Virginia St has been very responsive and working promptly to remedy the violations while 110 Virginia St has not responded on the matter. The lawsuit for 110 Virginia St was filed on October 4, 2024, and a receivership attorney will be appointed once the filing is returned to the City. City Attorney Galyean will report back to Council once more information becomes available.

The information was received by the City Council.

4. Investment Agreement
GRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: Regular Meeting of 10-7-24 Page 3 of 6 Authorize the City Administrator to enter into an agreement with Meeder Investment Group
Recommended Action(s):
a. Authorize City Administrator to sign the contract to enter into an agreement with Meeder Investment Group with the cost being .10% of the amount Meeder would be investing on behalf of the City
b. Authorize the City Administrator and Finance Director to make investment allocations/updates to the City of Gridley’s Investment Portfolio Finance Director Martin Pineda requested approval to enter into the agreement allowing Meeder Group to make investments on behalf of the City while working closely with Gridley’s Finance Director and City Administrator. City Administrator Arteaga informed Council that the decision on the amounts invested will remain the decision of City staff.

ROLL CALL
Motion: Johnson
Second: Sanchez
Action: to approve the investment agreement with Meeder Group and receive monthly progress reports on the investments.

Ayes: Roberts, Farr, Sanchez, Calderon, Johnson
Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
Motion passed, 5-0

5. Purchase Agreement
Purchase of Recreation Software for City Recreation Events Recommended Action(s):
a. Authorize City Administrator to sign a contract with ACTIVENet Recreation Management Software in the amount of $10,455
b. Approve Resolution 2024-R-038: Authorizing the supplemental appropriation Finance Director Martin Pineda presented the ACTIVENet software to Council and explained in his time as Interim Recreation Coordinator, he identified many areas of concern in the current recreation registrations/management. He stated the outdated process is prone to human error and as the City is expected to grow, implementing the ACTIVENet software will be vital to address and improve both internal processes and customer satisfaction.

ROLL CALL
Motion: Calderon
Second: Roberts
GRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: Regular Meeting of 10-7-24 Page 4 of 6 Action: to approve Resolution 2024-R-038 approving the supplemental appropriation for the purchase of the ACTIVENet software; approve the City Administrator to execute the contract Ayes: Roberts, Farr, Sanchez, Calderon, Johnson
Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
Motion passed, 5-0

6. Ordinance Review
Annual Review of City Ordinance 838-2022, Gridley Police Department Policy #706 and Gridley Police Department Military Equipment Report 2023 and Inventory for 2024 Recommended Action(s):
a. Review of City’s current Military Equipment Use Ordinance 838-2022 b. Review Gridley Police Department’s Policy #706 and Gridley Police Department Military Equipment Report 2023 and Inventory for 2024 to determine whether the Department’s use of the defined military equipment in the past year complied with the Policy,
c. Determine whether to continue with the adopted Ordinance and Policy, or act to modify the Policy or repeal the Ordinance
Police Chief Todd Farr presented the staff report to review City Ordinance 838-2022, Gridley Police Department Policy #706 and Gridley Police Department Military Equipment Report 2023 and Inventory for 2024 and determine whether the Department’s use of the defined military equipment in the past year complied with the Policy, and whether to continue the Ordinance and Policy.

ROLL CALL
Motion: Roberts
Second: Sanchez
Action: determine the Department’s use of the equipment complied with our internal policy and continue with the adopted ordinance and policy.

Ayes: Roberts, Farr, Sanchez, Calderon, Johnson
Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
Motion passed, 5-0

7. Memorandum of Understanding
Review of MOU with Butte County for the use of VEOCI, an emergency operations center command and control software to be used for disaster events and other large scale public GRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: Regular Meeting of 10-7-24 Page 5 of 6 events for coordination and document creation and retention, effect from date of execution through August 31, 2027.

Recommended Action(s):
a. Authorize City Administrator to enter into the memorandum of understanding with Butte County for VEOCI Software in the amount of $729.19 for year one, $803.93 for year two and $765.65 for year three
City Administrator Elisa Arteaga requested the approval of the MOU between the City of Gridley and Butte County for the cost-sharing of VEOCI software contract allowing the City to utilize the software platform designed to assist in managing-large scale events and local disasters and provide necessary documentation for possible FEMA reimbursement.

ROLL CALL
Motion: Sanchez
Second: Roberts
Action: to approve City Administrator enter the MOU with Butte County for VEOCI software.

Ayes: Roberts, Farr, Sanchez, Calderon, Johnson
Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
Motion passed, 5-0

COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
Councilmember Calderon gave an in-depth recap of his trip to City of Gridley’s sister city, Comala, Colima, MX.

Mayor Farr added to Councilmember Calderon’s report to speak highly of the representatives of Comala.

CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORTS
City Administrator Arteaga reported on her attendance at the Annual NCPA Conference.

DEPARTMENT UPDATE REPORTS –
A. Police Department from Police Chief, Todd Farr
Police Chief Farr briefly spoke on the quarterly Police Department report provided in the agenda packet.

Fire Chief Chip Fowler addressed the Council to present his recap of the Comala, Colima, MX trip he recently took with Councilmember Calderon. He also gave Council a brief update on the recent nearby wildfires.

GRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: Regular Meeting of 10-7-24 Page 6 of 6 POTENTIAL FUTURE CITY COUNCIL ITEMS - (Appearing on the Agenda within 30 days):

Procurement Policy 10/21/2024
Travel Policy 10/21/2024
Energy Efficiency Contract Review 10/21/2024

CLOSED SESSION
Council went into closed session at 7:27 pm.

8. Closed Session Discussion with Legal Counsel and Staff Pursuant to Government Code 54956.95 Regarding Liability Claim Against the City of Gridley by Araceli Anguiano

ROLL CALL
Motion: Johnson
Second: Roberts
Action: Reject claim: 1432 Oak Street: Araceli Anguiano Ayes: Roberts, Farr, Sanchez, Calderon, Johnson
Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None
Motion passed, 5-0

9. Closed session Item with legal counsel pursuant to Government Code 54956.9 – EXISTING LITIGATION – “ScottMcMillan, et al. vs. City of Gridley, Butte County Superior Court Case No. 21CV000451
No reportable action.

10. Closed Session discussion with City Administrator pursuant to Government Code 54957 Regarding Public Employment positions of Utility Director and Deputy City Clerk No reportable action.

Council came out of closed session at 8:28 pm.

ADJOURNMENT
With no further items left to discuss, Mayor Farr adjourned to the next regular meeting scheduled for October 21, 2024.

City Council Agenda Item #2
Staff Report
Date: October 21, 2024
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Elisa Arteaga, City Administrator
Subject: Review and Approval of Resolution No. 2024-R-039: A Resolution of The City Council of The City of Gridley Approving the Attestation of Veracity of the 2023 Power Source Disclosure Report, the 2023 Power Content Label and Submission of The Report to The California Energy Commission
Recommendation
City staff respectfully recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution approving the attestation of veracity for the 2023 Power Source Disclosure Report and submission of the report to the California Energy Commission.

Background
Under State law (Public Utilities Code Sections 398.4 and 398.5), retail suppliers of electricity must annually (1) disclose the type of generation resources (e.g., hydroelectric, solar, natural gas etc.) provided to their customers in the form of a Power Content Label (“PCL”), and (2) report this same information, together with supporting documentation in verified form, to the California Energy Commission (“CEC”), in the form of a Power Source Disclosure Report (“PSD”). The intent of the report is to educate customers through the disclosure of accurate, reliable, and simple to understand information regarding the generation attributes of the energy being provided by their service provider. Gridley City staff annually collects generation and energy procurement data necessary to prepare the annual PSD Report. This report is filed with the CEC each year. In May 2024, staff compiled the annual PSD report.

The CEC recently updated regulations for the power source disclosure report and changed the prior procedures. Primarily, the changes added a provision that the governing board of publicly owned utilities approve, at a public meeting, the attestation of the veracity of the annual power disclosure report.

The City’s Power Content Label is attached. The Label lists the percentages for the City’s energy mix.

The energy mix includes both renewable, carbon free, and some carbon-based energy. The City’s renewable and carbon free generation is better than the State average.

The City and Northern California Power Agency (“NCPA”) staff worked collaboratively to compile and present the numbers shown in the PSD and to confirm the accuracy and consistency of the data. This effort included cross checking numbers from the California Independent System Operator, NCPA generation metering, validations of market purchases from unspecified sources, and customer sales records. Through the process of cross checking by City staff, the City is assured that the PSD and PCL contain the most accurate information for the public.

X Regular
Special
Closed
Emergency
Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact related to the recommended action.

Compliance with City Council Strategic Plan or Budget Goals This report is consistent with our efforts to comply with State requirements and to ensure that our community members are fully informed of all City activities and all budgetary and financial efforts.

Attachment

1. Resolution No. 2024-R-039

2. City of Gridley 2023 PSD Attestation and Power Content Label RESOLUTION NO.
2024-R-039

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRIDLEY APPROVING THE ATTESTATION OF VERACITY FOR THE 2023 POWER SOURCE DISCLOSURE REPORT, 2023 POWER CONTENT

LABEL AND SUBMISSION OF THE REPORT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION WHEREAS, the City of Gridley owns and operates a publicly owned utility subject to certain laws and requirements of the State Legislature; and WHEREAS, Public Utility Code 398.4 and 398.5 establish a Power Source Disclosure (“PSD”) program that requires retail sellers of electricity to annually submit a power source disclosure report to the California Energy Commission; and WHEREAS, the Gridley Electric Utility is a retail seller of electricity as defined by the PSD Program and is therefore required to file a PSD report and post a Power Content Label; and WHEREAS, the governing body of a publicly owned utility must review and approve the PSD and veracity of an associated attestation submitted to the California Energy Commission; and
WHEREAS, Gridley staff prepared and submitted the 2023 Annual Power Source Disclosure Report to the Energy Commission in accordance with the timelines of the regulation; and
WHEREAS, the continued administrative action to review and submit the power source disclosure and related reports does not constitute a project under California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) guidelines and is therefore exempt from further environmental review.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Gridley does hereby;

1. Find that continue administrative actions are exempt from CEQA and no further environmental review is needed.

2. Approve the attestation of veracity for the 2023 Power Source Disclosure Report, the Power Content Label and submission of the report to the California Energy Commission.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Gridley at a regular meeting held on the 21st, day of October, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS

ATTEST APPROVE
_________________________ __________________________
Elisa Arteaga, City Clerk Michael W. Farr, Mayor

Version: April 2024
I, Ross Pippitt, Utility Manager, declare under penalty of perjury, that the information provided in ithis report is true and correct and that I, as an authorized agent of the City of Gridley Electric Utility, have authority to submit this report on the retail supplier's behalf. I further declare that all of the electricity claimed as specified purchases as shown in this report was sold once and only once to retail customers.

Name: Ross Pippitt
Representing: Utility Director
Signature:

Dated: s~~~ y -a~~y
City Council Agenda Item #3
Staff Report
Date: October 21, 2024
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Chip Fowler, Fire Chief
Subject: Approval of Resolution No 2024-R-040: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gridley Authorizing the Gridley Fire Department to receive a Rural Fire Capacity Grant
Recommendation
Staff respectfully requests the City Council approve Resolution 2024-R-0XX to allow the Gridley Fire Department to receive a Rural Fire Capacity Grant
Background
For several years the City of Gridley has been successful in receiving Rural Fire Capacity (RFC, previously known as Volunteer Fire Assistance, or VFA) Grants that are used to purchase Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for its volunteer firefighters who assist career firefighters to protect and serve the City of Gridley. The funding of the grant is vital for replacement of aging and worn PPE. The grant is a cost-effective mode for replacement. The cost of outfitting a single volunteer exceeds $5,000.00. PPE has a shelf life of 10 years and due to the nature of the profession, is subject to extreme use. There are approximately 15 volunteer firefighters that protect the Gridley area and replacement of PPE is ongoing as funding comes available.

Financial Impact
This year’s Grant is in the amount of $9756.00, which is a 50% match with the State of California. The City of Gridley’s match of this grant is $4878.00.

Compliance with City Council Strategic Plan or Budget Goals This effort complies with the City of Gridley’s Budget Goals to reduce taxpayer’s expenses by finding grant funding to offset budget impacts.

Attachments
Resolution No. 2024-R-040
RFC Agreement
X Regular
Special
Closed
Emergency
1 State of California
Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE)
Cooperative Fire Protection

GRANT AGREEMENT
APPLICANT:

PROJECT TITLE: Volunteer Fire Capacity
GRANT AGREEMENT: 7GF24017
PROJECT PERFORMANCE PERIOD is from date upon approval through June 30, 2025.

Under the terms and conditions of this Grant Agreement, the applicant agrees to complete the project as described in the project description, and the State of California, acting through the Department of Forestry & Fire Protection, agrees to fund the project up to the total state grant amount indicated.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Cost-share funds awarded to provide assistance to rural areas in upgrading their capability to organize, train, and equip local forces for fire protection.

Total State Grant not to exceed $ $4,878.00 (or project costs, whichever is less). *The Special and General Provisions attached are made a part of and incorporated into this Grant Agreement.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY

AND FIRE PROTECTION
Applicant
By By
Signature of Authorized Representative
Title

Title: David Scheurich
Staff Chief, Cooperative Fire Programs
Date Date

CERTIFICATION OF FUNDING

GRANT AGREEMENT NUMBER PO ID SUPPLIER ID

FUND FUND NAME
0001 General Fund

PROJECT ID
354024DG2012161

ACTIVITY ID
SUBGNT

AMOUNT OF ESTIMATE FUNDING
$ $4,878.00

GL UNIT
3540

BUD REF CHAPTER
001 35
ADJ. INCREASING ENCUMBRANCE
$ 0.00
PROGRAM NUMBER ENY ADJ. DECREASING ENCUMBRANCE
9999000FED 2024 $ 0.00

ACCOUNT
5340580

ALT ACCOUNT
5340580002

UNENCUMBERED BALANCE
$ $4,878.00

REPORTING STRUCTURE
35409206

SERVICE LOCATION
92767
I hereby certify upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance.

Signature of CAL FIRE Accounting Officer Date
7GF24017
2 VOLUNTEER FIRE CAPACITY PROGRAM

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Natural Resources Agency
Agreement for the Volunteer Fire Capacity Program of the Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered between the STATE of California, acting through the Director of the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection hereinafter called “STATE”, and ____________________________________________________________hereinafter called “LOCAL AGENCY”, covenants as follows:

RECITALS:

1. STATE has been approved as a passthrough agent of the United States Department of Agriculture, (USDA), Forest Service for the purpose of administering the Volunteer Fire Capacity program in California, hereinafter referred to as VFC, authorized by the Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act (CFAA) of 1978 (PL 95-313, 92 Stat 365, 16 U.S.C. 2106), as amended.

2. This is a subaward under the 2024 Volunteer Fire Capacity Grant #24-DG-11052012-161 awarded to STATE by the Forest Service on August 23, 2024. The Federal Assistance Listing for the award is 10.698, Cooperative Forestry Program. This subaward is funded solely with Federal funds and is subject to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance in subparts A through F of 2 CFR Part 200, as adopted and supplemented by the USDA in 2 CFR Part 400, and under certain terms and conditions to LOCAL AGENCY to assist LOCAL AGENCY to upgrade its fire protection capability.

3. LOCAL AGENCY desires to participate in said VFC and agrees to the terms and conditions specified in the Procedural Guide for Volunteer Fire Capacity Program 2024.

NOW THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed between the parties as follows:

4. APPROVAL: This Agreement is of no force or effect until signed by both parties and approved by the Department of General Services, if required. LOCAL AGENCY may not commence performance until such approval has been obtained.

5. INCORPORATION: The Procedural Guide for Volunteer Fire Capacity Program 2024, submitted Application for Funding and associated Grant Assurances are hereby incorporated by reference as part of the Grant Agreement.

6. TIMELINESS: Time is of the essence in this Agreement.

7. FORFEITURE OF AWARD: LOCAL AGENCY must return this Agreement and required resolution properly signed and executed to STATE at the email address specified in paragraph 12, with a timestamp no later than December 1, 2024 or LOCAL AGENCY will forfeit the funds.
7GF24017
3 8. GRANT AND BUDGET CONTIGENCY CLAUSE: It is mutually understood between the parties that this Agreement may have been written for the mutual benefit of both parties before ascertaining the availability of congressional appropriation of funds, to avoid program and fiscal delays that would occur if the Agreement were executed after that determination was made.

This Agreement is valid and enforceable only if sufficient funds are made available to the STATE by the United States Government for the State Fiscal Year 2024 for the purpose of this program. In addition, this Agreement is subject to any additional restrictions, limitations, or conditions enacted by the Congress or to any statute enacted by the Congress that may affect the provisions, terms, or funding of this Agreement in any manner.

The parties mutually agree that if the Congress does not appropriate sufficient funds for the program, this Agreement shall be amended to reflect any reduction in funds.

The STATE has the option to invalidate the Agreement under the 30-day cancellation clause or to amend the Agreement to reflect any reduction in funds.

9. REIMBURSEMENT: STATE will reimburse LOCAL AGENCY, from funds made available to STATE by the Federal Government, an amount not to exceed $4,878.00 on a 50/50 matching funds basis, for the performance of specific projects and/or purchase of specific items identified in Proposed Project, Application for Funding, attached hereto.

Reimbursement will be only for those projects accomplished and/or items purchased between THE LAST SIGNATORY DATE ON PAGE 1 and JUNE 30, 2025. This sum is the sole and maximum payment that STATE will make pursuant to this Agreement.

LOCAL AGENCY must bill STATE at the e-mail address specified in paragraph 12, with a timestamp no later than September 1, 2025 in order to receive the funds. The bill submitted by LOCAL AGENCY must clearly delineate the projects performed and/or items purchased. A vendor’s invoice and proof of payment to vendor(s) must be included for items purchased.

10. LIMITATIONS: Expenditure of the funds distributed by STATE herein is subject to the same limitations as placed by the VFC, upon expenditure of United States Government Funds. Pursuant to 2CFR200.313 Equipment, subject to the obligations and conditions set forth in that section; title to any equipment and supplies acquired under this Agreement vests with the LOCAL AGENCY. For any equipment items over $5,000, the federal government may retain a vested interested in accordance with paragraph 17 below.

11. MATCHING FUNDS: Any and all funds paid to LOCAL AGENCY under the terms of this Agreement, hereinafter referred to as “VFC Funds”, shall be matched by LOCAL AGENCY on a dollar-for-dollar basis, for each project listed on attachment(s) hereto identified as “Proposed Project”. No amount of unpaid “contributed” or “volunteer” labor or services shall be used or consigned in calculating the matching amount “actually spent” by LOCAL AGENCY.

LOCAL AGENCY shall not use VFC Funds as matching funds for other federal grants, including Department of Interior (USDI) Rural Fire Assistance grants, nor use funds from other federal grants, including USDI Rural Fire Assistance grants, as matching funds for VFC Funds.
7GF24017
4 12. ADDRESSES: The mailing addresses of the parties hereto under the terms of the Agreement are:

LOCAL AGENCY:

Attention:

Telephone Number(s):

E-mail
STATE: Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
Grants Management Unit, Attn: VFC
P. O. Box 944246
Sacramento, California 94244-2460
E-MAIL: [email protected]

13. PURPOSE: Any project to be funded hereunder must be intended to specifically assist LOCAL AGENCY to organize, train, and/or equip local firefighting forces in the aforementioned rural area and community to prevent or suppress fires which threaten life, resources, and/or improvements within the area of operation of LOCAL AGENCY. Project funds are not to be used for research and development.

14. COMBINING: In the event funds are paid for two or more separate, but closely related projects, the 50/50 cost-sharing formula will be applied to the total cost of such combined projects.

15. OVERRUNS: In the event that the total cost of a funded project exceeds the estimate of costs upon which this Agreement is made, LOCAL AGENCY may request additional funds to cover the Agreement share of the amount exceeded. However, there is no assurance that any such funds are, or may be, available for reimbursement. Any increase in funding will require an amendment.

16. UNDERRUNS: In the event that the total cost of a funded project is less than the estimate of costs upon which this Agreement is made, LOCAL AGENCY may request that additional eligible projects/items be approved by STATE for Agreement funding.

However, there is no assurance that any such approval will be funded. Approval of additional projects/items, not listed on the Proposed Project application, made by STATE, will be in writing and will require an amendment.

17. FEDERAL INTEREST IN EQUIPMENT: The Federal Government has a vested interest in any item purchased with VFC funding in excess of $5,000 regardless of the length of this Agreement, until such time as the fair market value is less than $5,000. The VFC percentage used to purchase the equipment will be applied to the sale price and recovered for the Government during the sale. This percentage will remain the same even following depreciation. The Federal Government may not have to be reimbursed if the disposal sale amounts to a fair market value of less than $5,000. LOCAL AGENCY will notify STATE of the disposal of such items.
7GF24017
5 18. EQUIPMENT INVENTORY: Any single item purchased in excess of $5,000 will be assigned an VFC Property Number by the STATE. LOCAL AGENCY shall forward a copy of the purchase documents listing the item, brand, model, serial number, any LOCAL AGENCY property number assigned, and a LOCAL AGENCY contact and return address to STATE at the address specified in paragraph 12. The STATE will advise the LOCAL AGENCY Contact of the VFC Property Number assigned.

19. AUDIT: LOCAL AGENCY agrees that the STATE, the Department of General Services, the Bureau of State Audits, or their designated representative shall have the right to review and to copy any records and supporting documentation pertaining to the performance of this Agreement. LOCAL AGENCY agrees to maintain such records for possible audit for a minimum of five (5) years after final payment, unless a longer period of records retention is stipulated. LOCAL AGENCY agrees to allow the auditor(s) access to such records during normal business hours and to allow interviews of any employees who might reasonably have information related to such records. Further, LOCAL AGENCY agrees to include a similar right of the State of California to audit records and interview staff in any subcontract related to performance of this Agreement. (GC 8546.7, PCC 10115 et seq., CCR Title 2, Section 1896).

20. DISPUTES: In the event of any dispute over qualifying matching expenditures of LOCAL AGENCY or audit findings, the dispute will be decided by STATE and its decision shall be final and binding.

21. MONITORING: LOCAL AGENCY agrees to the monitoring of activities as necessary by STATE to ensure that the award is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the agreement; and that performance goals are achieved.

22. INDEMNIFICATION: LOCAL AGENCY agrees to indemnify, defend, and save harmless, the STATE, its officers, agents, and employees, from any and all claims and losses, accruing or resulting to any and all contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, laborers, and any other person, firm or corporation furnishing or supplying work services, materials, or supplies in connection with the performance of this Agreement, and from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any person, firm or corporation who may be injured or damaged by LOCAL AGENCY in the performance of this Agreement.

23. CIVIL RIGHTS: LOCAL AGENCY agrees to comply with civil rights requirements as detailed in the Complying With Civil Rights Requirements brochure (FS-850) and the And Justice For All poster (AD-475A). The poster is to be placed at all public point of contact/reception areas.

24. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS: LOCAL AGENCY will comply with the requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990 and will provide a drug-free workplace by taking the following actions:
a. Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees for violations.
b. Establish a Drug-Free Awareness Program to inform employees about:
7GF24017
6 1) the dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
2) the person's or organization's policy of maintaining a drugfree workplace; 3) any available counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance programs; and,
4) penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations.
c. Every employee who works on the proposed Agreement will:
1) receive a copy of the company's drug-free workplace policy statement; and,
2) agree to abide by the terms of the company's statement as a condition of employment on the Agreement.

Failure to comply with these requirements may result in suspension of payments under the Agreement or termination of the Agreement or both and LOCAL AGENCY may be ineligible for funding of any future State Agreement if the department determines that any of the following has occurred: (1) the LOCAL AGENCY has made false certification, or violated the certification by failing to carry out the requirements as noted above. (GC 8350 et seq.)

25. TERM: The term of the Agreement SHALL COMMENCE ON THE LAST SIGNATORY DATE ON PAGE 1 and continue through June 30, 2025.

26. TERMINATION: This Agreement may be terminated by either party giving 30 days written notice to the other party or provisions herein amended upon mutual consent of the parties hereto.

27. AMENDMENTS: No amendment or variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing, signed by the parties and approved as required. No oral understanding or Agreement not incorporated in the Agreement is binding on any of the parties.

28. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR: LOCAL AGENCY, and the agents and employees of LOCAL AGENCY, in the performance of this Agreement, shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers or employees or agents of the STATE or the Federal Government.

29. INDIRECT RATE: LOCAL AGENCY may not assess an indirect rate in excess of their Federally approved Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (NICRA), a de minimis rate if LOCAL AGENCY does not have an approved NICRA, or the VFC program cap rate of 10%, whichever is lesser. LOCAL AGENCY may also elect not to assess an indirect rate.

The approved indirect cost rate at the time of execution is 0%. .
7GF24017
7 30. MEDIA: LOCAL AGENCY shall acknowledge STATE and USDA Forest Service support in any publications, audiovisuals and electronic media developed as a result of this award.

It is encouraged to give public notice of the receipt of this award and announce progress and accomplishments, acknowledging STATE and USDA Forest Service support. Follow direction in USDA Supplemental 2 CFR 415.2.

31. ASSIGNMENT: This Agreement is not assignable by LOCAL AGENCY either in whole or in part.

RESOLUTION NO.
2024-R-040

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRIDLEY AUTHORIZING THE GRIDLEY

FIRE DEPARTMENT TO RECEIVE A VOLUNTEER FIRE ASSISTANCE GRANT BE IT RESOLVED by the Gridley City Council as follows:

1. The Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute, on behalf of the City of Gridley, and the State of California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, a grant in the amount of $4,878.00 provided under the Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978 (7GF24017).

2. The City Clerk shall attest to the adoption of this Resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by Gridley City Council to approve the supplemental appropriation from the account 060-4060-56300 of $4,878.00 for the cost associated for the equipment to be purchased with this grant. To recognize the grant revenues, approve supplement revenues of $4,878.00 to account 010-0000-46611.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution of the City Council of the City of Gridley was duly introduced passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Gridley held on October 21, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVE:
_______________________ ______________________
Elisa Arteaga, City Clerk Michael W. Farr, Mayor

City Council Agenda Item #4
Staff Report
Date: October 21, 2024
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Elisa Arteaga, City Administrator
Subject: Adoption of 2024 Butte County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Recommendation
City staff respectfully recommends that the City Council pass a Resolution adopting the most recent edition of the Butte County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.

Background
On September 26, 2024 the Draft 2024 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) was submitted to CalOES with a request for joint review with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The Draft LHMP can be viewed on the county website. Butte-County-LHMP-Update_Sept-2024-PDF (buttecounty.net).

The purpose of the 2024 Butte County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan is to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and property, critical infrastructure, natural and historic and cultural resources, and other community assets from future hazards and natural disasters. The Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update was developed for participating agencies to be eligible for federal disaster assistance, specifically FEMA hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program and the Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) program.

Financial Impact
No additional financial impact is anticipated with this adoption.

Compliance with City Council Strategic Plan or Budget Goals The City Council and City staff are committed to providing effective leadership while providing quality cost effective local government services.

Attachments
Resolution 2024-R-041: A Resolution of the City of Gridley Adopting the 2024 Butte County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
X Regular
Special
Closed
Emergency
RESOLUTION NO.
2024-R-041
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRIDLEY ADOPTING THE 2024 BUTTE

COUNTY LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Gridley (City) recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to peoples an property within the City; and
WHEREAS the City has prepared a multi-hazard mitigation plan, hereby known as 2024 Butte County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan in accordance with federal laws, including the Robert T.

Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended; the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended; and the National Dam Safety Program Act, as amended; and
WHEREAS 2024 Butte County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan identifies mitigation goals and actions to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and property in the City from the impacts of future hazards and disasters; and
WHEREAS adoption by the City Council demonstrates its commitment to hazard mitigation and achieving the goals outlined in the 2024 Butte County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.

WHEREAS, the City is seeking FEMA approval of hazard mitigation plan desires to comply with the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act and to augment its emergency planning efforts by formally adopting the 2024 Butte County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan by reference into the Safety Element of the General Plan in accordance with the requirements of AB 2140; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF GRIDLEY, CA, THAT:
the City of Gridley adopts the 2024 Butte County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. While content related to the City may require revisions to meet the plan approval requirements, changes occurring after adoption will not require the City to re-adopt any further iterations of the plan.

Subsequent plan updates following the approval period for this plan will require separate adoption resolutions.

BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Gridley adopts the 2024 Butte County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan by reference into the safety element of their general plan in accordance with the requirements of AB 2140; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City will submit this adoption resolution to the California Office of Emergency Services and FEMA Region IX officials to enable the plan’s final approval in accordance with the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 and to establish conformance with the requirement of AB 2140.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Gridley at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 21st day of October, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ATTEST: APPROVE:
______________________ _______________________
Elisa Arteaga, City Clerk Mike Farr, Mayor
Butte County D-1
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
September 2024
Appendix D Adoption Resolution
Note to Reviewers: When this plan has been reviewed and approved pending adoption by FEMA Region IX, the adoption resolutions will be signed by each participating jurisdiction and added to this appendix.

Three model resolutions are provided below. For the County and the incorporated communities this adoption resolution also includes intent to comply with AB 2140 requiring adoption by reference or incorporation into the Safety Element of the General Plan.

Three resolutions were created – one for the County and incorporated communities, one for the Special Districts, and one for the Tribe.

Butte County D-2
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
September 2024
Sample County and Incorporated Community Adoption Resolution (LOCAL GOVERNMENT: County/Incorporated Communities)
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF (LOCAL GOVERNMENT) ADOPTING THE (TITLE AND DATE OF MITIGATION PLAN).

WHEREAS the (local governing body) recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property within (local government); and
WHEREAS the (local government) has prepared a multi-hazard mitigation plan, hereby known as (title and date of mitigation plan) in accordance with federal laws, including the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended; the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended; and the National Dam Safety Program Act, as amended; and WHEREAS (title and date of mitigation plan) identifies mitigation goals and actions to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and property in (local government) from the impacts of future hazards and disasters; and
WHEREAS adoption by the (local governing body) demonstrates its commitment to hazard mitigation and achieving the goals outlined in the (title and date of mitigation plan).

WHEREAS, the (local governing body) seeking FEMA approval of hazard mitigation plan desires to comply with the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act and to augment its emergency planning efforts by formally adopting the (title and date of mitigation plan) by reference into the Safety Element of the General Plan in accordance with the requirements of AB 2140; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE (LOCAL GOVERNMENT), (STATE), THAT:

In accordance with (local rule for adopting resolutions), the (local governing body) adopts the (title and date of mitigation plan). While content related to (local government) may require revisions to meet the plan approval requirements, changes occurring after adoption will not require (local government) to readopt any further iterations of the plan. Subsequent plan updates following the approval period for this plan will require separate adoption resolutions.

BE IT RESOLVED, that the (Name of Government/District/Organization seeking FEMA approval of hazard mitigation plan) adopts the (title and date of mitigation plan) by reference into the safety element of their general plan in accordance with the requirements of AB 2140; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the (local governing body) will submit this adoption resolution to the California Office of Emergency Services and FEMA Region IX officials to enable the plan’s final approval in accordance with the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 and to establish conformance with the requirement of AB 2140.

Butte County D-3
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
September 2024
ADOPTED by a vote of ____ in favor and ____ against, and ____ abstaining, this _____ day of ___________, ______.

By: _________________________________ (print name)
ATTEST: By: _________________________________ (print name) APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: _________________________________ (print name)

Butte County D-4
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
September 2024
Sample Special District Adoption Resolution
(LOCAL GOVERNMENT: Special Districts)
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF (LOCAL GOVERNMENT) ADOPTING THE (TITLE AND DATE OF MITIGATION PLAN).

WHEREAS the (local governing body) recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property within (local government); and
WHEREAS the (local government) has prepared a multi-hazard mitigation plan, hereby known as (title and date of mitigation plan) in accordance with federal laws, including the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended; the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended; and the National Dam Safety Program Act, as amended; and WHEREAS (title and date of mitigation plan) identifies mitigation goals and actions to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and property in (local government) from the impacts of future hazards and disasters; and
WHEREAS adoption by the (local governing body) demonstrates its commitment to hazard mitigation and achieving the goals outlined in the (title and date of mitigation plan).

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE (LOCAL GOVERNMENT), (STATE), THAT:

In accordance with (local rule for adopting resolutions), the (local governing body) adopts the (title and date of mitigation plan). While content related to (local government) may require revisions to meet the plan approval requirements, changes occurring after adoption will not require (local government) to readopt any further iterations of the plan. Subsequent plan updates following the approval period for this plan will require separate adoption resolutions.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the (local governing body) will submit this adoption resolution to the California Office of Emergency Services and FEMA Region IX officials to enable the plan’s final approval in accordance with the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000.

ADOPTED by a vote of ____ in favor and ____ against, and ____ abstaining, this _____ day of ___________, ______.

By: _________________________________ (print name)
ATTEST: By: _________________________________ (print name) APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: _________________________________ (print name) Butte County D-5
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
September 2024
Sample Tribal Adoption Resolution
(Insert name of Tribal Government)
RESOLUTION NO.
[Insert Title and Date of Mitigation Plan]
WHEREAS the [insert Tribal governing body name] recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property within the [insert Tribe name];
WHEREAS the [insert Tribe name] has prepared a multi-hazard mitigation plan in accordance with the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 and the requirements in Title 44 Code of Federal Regulations Section 201.7;
WHEREAS the Plan specifically addresses hazard mitigation strategies and plan maintenance procedures for [insert Tribe name];
WHEREAS the Plan recommends several hazard mitigation actions and projects that will provide mitigation for specific natural hazards that impact [insert Tribe name], with the effect of protecting people and property from loss associated with those hazards;
WHEREAS, adoption of this plan will make the [insert Tribe name] eligible for funding to alleviate the impacts of future hazards on the Reservation,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the [insert appropriate official titles] of the [insert Tribe name] that:

1. The Plan is hereby adopted as an official plan of [insert Tribe name].

2. The respective officials identified in the mitigation strategy of the Plan are hereby directed to pursue implementation of the recommended actions assigned to them.

3. Future revisions and plan maintenance required by 44 CFR 201.7 and FEMA are hereby adopted as a part of this resolution for a period of five (5) years from the date of this resolution.

4. An annual report on the progress of the implementation elements of the Plan shall be presented to the [insert appropriate official titles such as Mayor, Governor, Tribal Council, etc.] by [insert date] of each calendar year.

5. The [insert Tribe name] will comply with all applicable Federal statutes and regulations in effect with respect to the periods for which it receives grant funding, including 2 CFR Parts 200 and 3002; and will amend our plan whenever necessary to reflect applicable changes in Tribal or federal laws and statutes.

PASSED by the [insert appropriate title], this ___ day of ____ (month), _____(year).

City Council Agenda Item #5
Staff Report
Date: October 21, 2024
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Elisa Arteaga, City Administrator
Subject: State Route 99 Waterline Relocation Project – Construction Management and Inspection Services Task Order
Recommendation
City staff respectfully recommend that the City Council authorize the City Administrator to execute a Task Order with 4Leaf, Inc. in the amount of $113,867 and a budget of $125,000. Task Order CM-01 for Construction Management Services will include construction management, inspection services and materials testing for SR-99 Waterline Relocation Project. The contract is based on Time and Material rates and is subject to change based on actual time of construction.

Background
The City has been partnered with BCAG and Caltrans for the Complete Streets Improvement Project on State Route 99 that runs all the way through the City of Gridley. The project started as a Caltrans pavement maintenance effort but thought years of community outreach and coordination between the local agencies, millions of dollars of additional funding have been secured to improve safety and beautify the City. The improvements proposed in the Complete Streets Project include new ADA compliant 8-foot sidewalks separated from traffic and accessible for bicycles, landscaping, uniform lighting, and a storm drain system.

As a result of the improvements, sections of the City’s watermain in the State right of way conflict with the proposed drainage system and require relocation. The sections of the waterline that need relocation to avoid conflicts are located at the intersection of Sheldon Ave and a section from Obermeyer Ave. to Archer Ave. The relocation will lower the section of pipe at Sheldon Ave and will shift the pipe west into the northbound travel lane form Obermeyer Ave to Acher Ave to provide the minimum separation requirements between the future storm drain and watermain. In total, approximately 1,400 feet of pipe will be replaced, and upsized, most of which are over 50 years old and made of Asbestos Concrete.

To meet the current schedule for the construction of the Complete Streets Improvements, the relocation of the waterline needs to be completed by March 1, 2025.

On September 3rd, 2024, the City Council authorized the City Administrator to execute professional service agreement contracts with four firms for the On-call construction management and inspection services for the City. Staff requested proposals for construction management and inspection from all four firms on the on-call list. 4 Leaf, Inc. provided the lowest cost estimate for the proposed work. The table below lists cost received from each firm.

X Regular
Special
Closed
Emergency
Firm CM/RE Materials Testing Total
4Leaf, Inc. $81,242 $32,625 $113,867
Ghirardelli $92,955 $61,093.00 $154,048
Gannett Fleming $109,161 $53,315 $162,476
UNICO $74,350 $42,042 $116,392
Financial Impact
The portion of the project is budgeted in the City’s FY-24/25 CIP Budget for the water line project.

However, if the use of the construction contingency is required later in construction, this contract could put the project over the original budget amount. Staff is working on budget adjustments and will report on any recommended budget adjustments during the mid-year budget review.

Compliance with City Council Strategic Plan or Budget Goals The City Council and City staff are committed to providing effective leadership while providing quality cost-effective local government services.

Attachments – 4Leaf, Inc. - Scope and Fee
• Engineering • Construction Management • Inspection • Plan Check 8896 North Winding Way • Fair Oaks, CA 95628 • Phone (916) 965-0010 • Fax (916) 965-0013 October 1, 2024

CITY OF GRIDLEY

QUOTE FOR INSPECTION / RE SERVICES
TASK ORDER #01
STATE ROUTE 99 WATERLINE RELOCATION PROJECT

CONSTRUCTION RE/INSPECTION SERVICES
Schedule/Duration: October 30, 2024 to December 31, 2024 (40 work days) TASK ORDER SCOPE: Provide construction inspection services, as needed Resident Engineer services, and material testing services for the SR99 Waterline Relocation Project.

The work consists of removing the existing 10” asbestos concrete waterline and installing new 12” C-900 PVC pipe for approximately 1,330 linear feet and lowering an existing 10” C-900 pipe segment. The project also includes removal of existing hydrants, installation of new hydrants, and water service line reconnections. The project will occur along the State Route 99 corridor within the City Limits.

The project is estimated at 40 work days and will be night shift. We propose a full time senior level inspector to provide inspections and coordinate as necessary with a Resident Engineer for RFI research or other engineering tasks.

Our inspector will produce detailed daily inspection reports, coordinate material testing and geotech inspections, monitors SWPPP/BMP and environmental compliance, encroachment permit complianct. He will monitor the project scope and the schedule, facilitate the submittal, RFI, and Change Order processes, and help to keep forward momentum on the project on behalf of the City. Our team will attend a precon meeting with Caltrans.

Proposed Lead Inspector: Dave Irby
We chose Senior Construction Inspector Dave Irby for his estensive experience on public works utility projects and his proximity to the jobsite. Dave has extensive project experience with underground utilities from his work with SMUD and PG&E and brings a strong background knowledge of local procedures and protocols and jobsite management. Dave is scrupulous in his record keeping, maintaining the required documentation.

Proposed As Needed Resident Engineer: Guy Howes, PE
Guy is an experienced California Registered Civil Engineer with extensive project experience including 27years with the City of Roseville.

Material Testing: Construction Testing Services (CTS), Inc.

Our subconsultant firm, Construction Testing Services, Inc. will provide trench and pavement testing to meet Caltrans requirements. Material testing services will consist of:

Onsite Testing
Trench backfill compaction
Asphalt nuclear gauge comp test
Laboratory Testing
ASTM D2041 RICE METHOD GRAVITY
ASTM D1557 MODIFIED PROCTOR TEST
Our scope will include red line markups of field changes in scope. • Engineering • Construction Management • Inspection • Plan Check 8896 North Winding Way • Fair Oaks, CA 95628 • Phone (916) 965-0010 • Fax (916) 965-0013

COST ESTIMATE
TASK ORDER #01
SR 99 Waterline Relocation Project

BASIS OF CHARGES
a) Assumes project will require compliance with California Prevailing Wage rate requirements under SB 854, and the County will be required to file a PWC-100 Form to the California Department of Industrial Relations for the project. b) Rates for prevailing wage categories are subject to annual escalations in accordance with the bi-annual wage determinations from the California DIR. Rates based on California DIR’s wage determinations dated 9/17/2020, the RFP issue date.
c) Per the new requirements being enforced under SB 854 and because it is assumed that a PWC-100 Form will be filed by the County to the CA DIR, 4LEAF is required to notify an authorized Apprenticeship Committee through submittal of a DAS-140 form. 4LEAF is then required to make an official request to an authorized Apprenticeship Committee for an apprentice by submitting a DAS-142 form. We are not assured the apprenticeship committee will be able to provide a suitable / qualified apprentice for the project. Per the apprenticeship requirements, the hours worked by the apprentice must be in a ratio of 1:5 for apprentice to journeyman hours. Hours are included as a placeholder in the event that an apprenticeship for a public works inspector is required and dispatched by the apprenticeship committee.
d) Site work is subject to an 8 hour minimum unless stated otherwise. e) 4LEAF staff will be supplied with typical tools of the trade to perform their daily tasks (e.g., cell phone, laptop computer, and PPE). Assumes County will provide office space for CM and Inspector to finalize daily reports and other project paperwork.

Task
Order
Sub
Task Task Description Principal In Charge Bert Gross, PE Construction Inspector Resident Engineer Cost Per Task Hourly Rate $205 $172 $188
1 STATE ROUTE 99 WATERLINE RELOCATION (40 work days - night shift) Hours Hours Hours Total Inspection/RE Services 6 328 88 $74,190
Night shift adjustment (12.5%) for inspector only 0.125 $7,052 $32,625
Total Task 01 $113,867
Material Testing and Special Inspection Services
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE: QUALITY ASSURANCE INSPECTIONS & TESTING DATE: 10/01/2024
PROPOSAL No.: P27371
CLIENT: 1248 - 4LEAF, Inc
PROJECT: Gridley Hwy 99 Waterline Project
Township Rd and West Liberty Rd
LOCATION: Gridley
ITEM: I ESTIMATED ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED

ONSITE TESTING & INSPECTIONS DAYS HOURS PRICE TOTAL

GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES
TRENCH BACKFILL COMPACTION (PORTAL TO PORTAL) NT 14 8 $152.00 $17,024.00 ASPH. NUC GAUGE COMP TEST (PORTAL TO PORTAL) NT 2 8 $152.00 $2,432.00 FIELD MILEAGE - NUC GAUGE 16 110 $0.670 $1,179.20
F385P-TRAVEL TIME -W/NUC GAUGE NT 16 2 $152.00 $4,864.00 Preliminary Sub-Total of Onsite Testing & Inspection (approx.) $25,499.20 ITEM: II ESTIMATED UNIT ESTIMATED

LABORATORY TESTING & ENGINEERING UNIT/HOURS PRICE TOTAL ASTM D2041 RICE GRAVITY 2 $500.00 $1,000.00
ASTM D1557 MODIFIED PROCTOR 2 $350.00 $700.00
SAMPLE PICK-UPS 4 $15.00 $60.00
STAFF ENGINEER 5 $165.00 $825.00
FIELD SUPERVISION 1 $165.00 $165.00
PROJECT MANAGER 5 $165.00 $825.00
PRINCIPAL ENGINEER 1 $380.00 $380.00
CERTIFIED PAYROLL ADMIN (IF NEEDED) 1 $205.00 $205.00
Preliminary Subtotal of Laboratory Testing & Engineering (approx.) $4,160.00 Preliminary Estimated Fees $29,659.20
Project Administration (10%) $2,965.92
Total Preliminary Estimated Fees $32,625.12
*Steel shop price based on work being done in Northern California in one shop and one shift. If work is performed at night a 12.5% differential will be charged.

A 10% project administration fee will be charged monthly per invoice.

No contingency is budgeted by CTS for uncontrollable overtime, union or prevailing wage increases and unforeseen requirements that may arise in the specifications, as well as for work over the estimated hours. Owner should budget appropriate amount for budgetary purposes.

No construction schedule was available at the time this estimate was prepared. See attached fee schedule for basis of charges.

The liability of Construction Testing Services (CTS) is limited to CTS's contract value.

Estimate includes portal to portal travel time for nuclear gauge transport from laboratory per requirements of the CA Radiological Health Branch.

Drive time with equipment including but not limited to nuclear gauge will be billed at the OT rate if over of 8hrs worked for the day.

Standard Discount
* FIELD INSPECTION AND LABORATORY SERVICE Rate/Hour Rate/Hour Steel Visual $245.00
Nondestructive - UT, MT, PT $250.00
Steel Visual/UT Combination $250.00
Steel Shop Inspections – Outside Northern California $245.00 Concrete ACI $245.00 $135.00
Concrete ICC $245.00 $135.00
Masonry $245.00
Fireproofing $245.00
Firestopping $245.00
Shear Wall Nailing/Framing/Hold Downs $245.00
Soil Technician w/Nuclear Gauge and/or Sand Cone (portal-to-portal) $245.00 $135.00 Asphalt Technician (portal-to-portal) $245.00 $135.00
Shoring/Soldier Piers $245.00
Roofing & Waterproofing $245.00
NACE Coating Inspection - Level II $295.00
NACE Coating Inspection - Level III $355.00
Med-Gas 6020 $245.00
Multi-Disciplined Inspector $245.00
Inspector Requiring G1 Pay Grade $295.00
Specialty Inspector or Where Formal Certification is Required $245.00 Field Inspector with Special Enhancement $245.00
DSA Masonry Inspector $250.00
Safety Manager/Safety Inspector/Jobsite Safety Accountability Supervisor (JSAS) $515.00 Laboratory Technician $245.00
Additional Sample Preparation Time $245.00
Technician Typist $245.00
**PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
Principal Engineer (Civil/Structural) $380.00
Geotechnical Engineer $335.00
Professional Geologist $320.00
Consulting Engineer (Civil/Structural) $315.00
Associate Engineer, Licensed $275.00
Project Manager/Project Executive $245.00 $165.00
Staff Engineer $245.00 $165.00
Field Supervision $245.00 $165.00
ASNT Level III $295.00
Drafting $180.00
Quality Control Manager QOR

SPECIAL SERVICES
Portable and Mobile Laboratories, NDT and Soils QOR
* Epoxy Bolt/Expansion Anchor - Installation Observation $245.00 * Epoxy Bolt/Expansion Anchor Proof Load Testing (portal-to-portal) $245.00 * Coring, 1 Person (including equipment) (portal-to-portal) $320.00 * Coring, 2 Persons (including equipment) (portal-to-portal) $475.00 * Asphalt Coring (portal-to-portal) $345.00
Project Research QOR
Ultrasonic Testing for Non-Metallic Materials QOR
Pavement Rehabilitation Analysis Using Deflections QOR
Roof Moisture Survey QOR
Soil Drilling Equipment QOR
Geotechnical Site Investigations/Foundation Reports QOR Estimating Concrete Strength by the Maturity Method - Equipment Fee $125/kit ASTM C1074 QOR CSL/Crosshole Sonic Logging QOR
Vector Mapping QOR
Roof Uplift Testing QOR
Inclinometer Testing QOR
Vibration Moniroring/Accelerometer QOR
Tilt Monitoring QOR
External Windows And Doors Dynamic Water Penetration Testing AAMA 501.1 QOR Curtain Wall Testing AAMA 501.2 QOR
Ground Penetrating Radar QOR
DCP - Dynamic Cone Penetrometer QOR
Gamma-Gamma Logging of CIDH Piles (Daily Rate) CT233 $3,605.00 FGIA/AAMA Window and Skylight Testing (Daily Rate) ASTM E1105, AAMA 501.2, 502 503 $3,605.00 Pachometer, Schmidt Hammer, Windsor Probe, Skidmore - Equipment Fee $115/Day (portal-to-portal) $355.00 Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Testing - Equipment Fee $250/Day (portal-to-portal) ASTM C597 $705.00 Impact Echo Testing - Equipment Fee $250/Day (portal-to-portal) ASTM C1383 $355.00 Floor Flatness Testing FF/FL - Equipment Fee $115/Day (portal-to-portal) ASTM E1155 $355.00 Surface Frictional Properties Using Pendulum Tester - Equipment Fee $115/Day (portal-to-portal) ASTM E303 $355.00 Measuring Moisture Vapor Emission Rate (Calcium Chloride) - $55/Kit (portal-to-portal) ASTM F1869 $355.00 Relative Humidity Testing - $75/Kit (portal-to-portal) ASTM F2170 $355.00 Ferroscan - Equipment Fee $115/day (portal-to-portal) $355.00 GPR - Equipment Fee $115/day (portal-to-portal) $405.00 Dynamic Cone Penetrometer - Equipment Fee $155/day $405.00 Administration, Secretarial, Special Projects, Notary, Certified Payroll $205.00 Concrete/Grout/Mortar Mix Design Review (less than 48 hours notice - $500) $380.00 Welding Procedure Review (less than 48 hours notice - $500) $380.00 Procedure Qualification Record (PQR) - Standard Procedure (document fee) $555.00 Welding Procedure Specification (WPS) - Standard Procedure (document fee) $555.00 Welder Qualification Test Record (WQTR) - Standard Procedure (document fee) $555.00 DSA Interim Reports $230.00
Geotechnical Pad Letter (less than 48 hours notice - $550) $405.00 Final Letter (less than 48 hours notice - $550) $405.00

EXPERT WITNESS TESTIMONY
Court appearance, per day $3,005.00
Court appearance, per half day $2,005.00
2024 FEE SCHEDULE - P27371 10/1/2024

PERSONNEL FEES AND BASIS OF CHARGES

INSPECTIONS, ENGINEERING & SPECIAL SERVICES
* Field inspection and laboratory technician services will be billed in accordance with minimums shown on Basis of Charges. **Professional engineering services will be billed in two hour increments. inspecting
testing
engineering
All fees subject to Basis of Charges
inspecting
testing
engineering

GENERAL
MINIMUM HOURLY CHARGES – INSPECTION
Technician personnel and the following minimum charges are contractual commitment:

One-half day or less 4 Hours
Over one-half day 8 Hours
Show-up time (less than 2 hours notice = 4 hour charge) 2 Hours

WORKING HOURS AND PREMIUM TIME
Regular workday is the first 8 hours between 6:00 am and 6:00 pm Monday through Friday. Premium time is as follows:

Overtime, Weekdays and Saturdays (first 8 hours) 1.5 x quoted hourly rate Overtime Saturdays (over 8 hours) and Sundays (first 8 hours) 2 x quoted hourly rate Overtime Sundays (over 8 hours) and Holidays 3 x quoted hourly rate Shift differential, swing and graveyard -
(Work performed between 2:00 pm and 4:00 am) 12.5%/hour additional to base or quoted rate.

MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES - Only Where Applicable
Notary Services Fee $45.00/each
Facsimile Charges. Plus $1.00/page (n/c for cover page) $12.00/minimum Wireless Router/Data Card for Jobsite Internet $140.00/day iPad Monthly Rental Fee $105.00/month
Electronic Reporting Fees/Subscriptions (PlanGrid, BIM, etc.) At Cost Parking Fees At Cost
Air Travel Cost Plus 20%
Outside Services Cost Plus 30%
Subsistence (per Union contract) $135.00/day
Subsistence Premium: Meal Allowance (over 100 miles one way) (per Union contract) $35.00/day Subsistence Premium: Meal Allowance (over 150 miles one way) (per Union contract) $90.00/day Mileage Standard Federal Rate
Sample Pickup $35.00/each $15.00/each
Sample Pickup Trip Charge QOR
Weekend Sample Pickup $155.00/each
Project Administration 20% of Monthly Invoice
Samples Made by Others: Concrete Cylinders $135 + Test
Samples Made by Others: All Other Tests $80.00 + Test
Laboratory Sample Witness Fee $135.00
Laboratory Sample Storage Fee (per sample) $125.00
EZ Cure Boxes (Thermostatically Controlled Curing Boxes) QOR Returned Check Fee $155.00
Additional Sample Retention QOR
TESTS

INSURANCE

PAYMENT

BASIS OF CHARGES
10% of Monthly Invoice
Testing fees shown include normal time for performing test. Samples requiring special preparation will be charged at the laboratory technician rate. Fees for tests not listed will be quoted upon request. There will be a minimum charge of $100.00 for any engineering report. Please note some tests may be tested by subconsultants. Samples delivered to the laboratory after 3:00pm or samples needing results within 24 hours will incur a 50% mark-up.

The liability of Construction Testing Services (CTS) is limited to CTS's contract value.

Invoices will be submitted monthly or bimonthly for services performed during the preceding month and are payable on receipt. Interest of 1.5% per month (but not exceeding the maximum rate allowable by law) will be payable on any amounts not paid within 30 days, payment thereafter to be applied first to accrued interest and then to the principle unpaid amount. Attorney’s fees or other costs incurred in collecting any delinquent amount shall be paid by client. Visa, MasterCard and American Express payments are accepted however fees will apply. Visa and MasterCard payments require an additional 3% on top of the amount of the invoice being paid. American Express payments require an additional 4% on top of the amount of the invoice being paid.

Fees for tests and inspection include cost of technician, normal equipment and regular reports. Engineering services will be charged at applicable rates and will require travel and mileage charges for equipment transport and storage per code (portal to portal) from the nearest CTS laboratory. Soils testing with nuclear gauge and/or sand cone equipment and inspections requiring equipment will require applicable travel and mileage charges for equipment transport and storage per code (portal-to-portal) from the nearest CTS laboratory.

Fees for special projects, services overseas, or elsewhere in the United States, will be quoted on request. With prior notification to Client; charges are subject to change at any time.

Construction Testing Services reserves the right to adjust the rates quoted in this contract based upon any Union or prevailing wage increases and/or changes in any industry requirements.

All fees subject to Basis of Charges
inspecting
testing
engineering
Standard Discounted
CONCRETE Rate/Each Rate/Each
Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens (6x12) ASTM C39 and CT521 $100.00 $80.00 Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens (4x8) ASTM C39 and CT521 $100.00 $80.00 Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens (Over 8000 PSI) ASTM C39 and CT521 $175.00 Cylinder molds. 6” x 12” and 4" x 8" ASTM C470 $95.00
Compressive Strength of Lightweight Insulating Concrete ASTM C495 $115.00 Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Core and Sawed Beam Specimens ASTM C42 $150.00 Flexural Toughness of Fiber Reinforced Concrete (Round Panel) ASTM C1550 $560.00 Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third-Point Loading) ASTM C78 $360.00 Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third-Point Loading) CT523 and CT524 $360.00 Length Change of Hardened Hydraulic-Cement Mortar and Concrete (Shrinkage, 1 Sample) ASTM C157 $185.00 Shotcrete Nozzleman Qualification Letter (Per Nozzleman, Per Position) ACI 506, ASTM C42 and C1140 $510.00 Shotcrete Pre-Qualification Cores (Compression and Visual) ACI 506, ASTM C42 and C1140 $135.00 Shotcrete Production Cores ASTM C1140 $135.00
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion AASHTO T336 $585.00
Determining Density of Structural Lightweight Concrete (Cylinders) ASTM C567 $460.00 Standard Specification for Concrete Made by Volumetric Batching and Mixing ASTM C685 $3,000.00 Cement Quality Sampling CBC 2010 $710.00
Physical Testing of Gypsum, Gypsum Plasters and Gypsum Concrete ASTM C472 $75.00 Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens ASTM C496 $280.00 Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson's Ratio of Concrete in Compression ASTM C469 $260.00 Grab Sample, Sealing and Storing in a Humidity and Temperature Controlled Room CBC $170.00 Density of Hydraulic Cement ASTM C188 $230.00
Testing of Controlled Low Strength Material (CLSM) Test Cylinders ASTM D4832 $185.00 GFRC Pull Test PCI $450.00
GFRC Flexural Test PCI $450.00
Foaming Agents for Use in Producing Cellular Concrete Using Preformed Foam (Cell-Crete) ASTM C796 $610.00

MASONRY
Compressive Testing of Grout (Masonry) ASTM C1019 $145.00 Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars Using 2" Cube Specimens ASTM C109 $145.00 Compressive Strength of Masonry Prisms ASTM C1314 $220.00 Testing Concrete Masonry Units and Related Units (Core Compression) CBC 2105A.4 $220.00 Compressive Strength of Molded Masonry Mortar Cylinders and Cubes (2" Sample) ASTM C780 A7.6 $145.00 Testing Concrete Masonry Units (CMU) and Related Units (Full Unit) ASTM C140 $220.00 Linear Drying Shrinkage of Concrete Masonry Units (Per Unit) ASTM C426 $325.00 Masonry Core Shear Testing CBC 2105A.4 $325.00
Testing Concrete Masonry Units (Absorption, Moisture Content, Unit Weight) ASTM C140 $400.00 Brick and Clay Tile (modulus of rupture, compression, saturation coefficient, suction rate, efflorescence)* ASTM C67 $1,060.00 Mortar Molds. 2” x 4”. Single Use $145.00
Mortar or Grout, Stored and Cured, Not Tested (Including Mold) $145.00 Veneer Bond Testing, does not include sample fabrication (Set of 5) ASTM C482 $535.00

AGGREGATES (CONCRETE AND SOILS)
Sieve Analysis of Coarse Aggregates (Coarse Only 2" - No.4)(sample size over 2" QOR) ASTM C136, CT202, and AASHTO T-27 $255.00 $150.00 Sieve Analysis of Fine Aggregates (Fine Only, Wash Included No.4 - No.200) ASTM C136/C117, CT202, and AASHTO T27/AASHTO T-11 $325.00 $150.00 Sieve Analysis of Combined Fine and Coarse Aggregates (Wash Included 2" - No.200) (sample size over 2" QOR)
ASTM C136/C117, CT202, and AASHTO T27/AASHTO T-11 $410.00 Materials Finer Than 75-µm (No. 200) Sieve in Mineral Aggregates by Washing (200 Wash) ASTM C117, CT202, and AASHTO T-11 $255.00 Evaluating Cleanness of Coarse Aggregate CT227 $410.00
Soundness of Aggregates by Use of Sodium Sulfate or Magnesium Sulfate ASTM C88, CT214, and AASHTO T-104 $900.00 Bulk Density/Unit Weight of Aggregate ASTM C29, CT212, and AASHTO T-19 $235.00 Clay Lumps and Friable Particles in Aggregates ASTM C142 and AASHTO T-19 $260.00 Flat Particles, Elongated Particles or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate ASTM D4791 and CT235 $425.00 Organic Impurities in Fine Aggregates for Concrete ASTM C40 and CT213 $425.00 Density, Relative Density(Specific Gravity), and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate ASTM C127, CT206, and AASHTO T-85 $425.00 Density, Relative Density(Specific Gravity), and Absorption of Fine Aggregate ASTM C128, CT207, and AASHTO T-84 $425.00 Resistance to Degradation of Small Size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles Machine ASTM C131, C211, and AASHTO T-96 $575.00
Resistance to Degradation of Large Size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles Machine ASTM C535 $575.00
Percentage of Crushed Particles/Standard Test Method for Determining the Percentage of Fractured Particles in Coarse Aggregate ASTM D5821, CT205, and AASHTO T-335 $460.00 Uncompacted Void Content of Fine Aggregate (as Influenced by Particle Shape, Surface Texture, and Grading) ASTM C1252, CT234, and AASHTO T304A $460.00
Sand Equivalent Value of Soils and Fine Aggregate ASTM D2419, CT217, and AASHTO T-176 $325.00 Durability Index (Fine) ASTM D3744, CT229, AASHTO T-210 $460.00 Durability Index (Coarse) ASTM D3744, CT229, AASHTO T-210 $460.00 Durability Index (Fine and Coarse) ASTM D3744, CT229, AASHTO T-210 $600.00 Lightweight Particles in Aggregate ASTM C123 and AASHTO T113 QOR Resistance of Rock to Wetting and Drying CRD-C169 $635.00 Aggregate Moisture Content ASTM C566 $635.00
*Unusual sample preparation for brick specimen will be charged at the established hourly rate.

CONCRETE AND MASONRY TESTS
All fees subject to Basis of Charges
inspecting
testing
engineering
Standard Discounted
SOILS Rate/Each Rate/Each
Moisture Content of Soil by Oven ASTM D2216, CT226, and AASHTO T-265 $180.00 Moisture Content of Soil by Microwave Oven ASTM D4643 $235.00 Density of Soil in Place by the Drive-Cylinder Method including Moisture Content of Soil by Oven ASTM D2937 $265.00 Remold of Soil Samples Varies $160.00
Hydraulic Conductivity of Saturated Porous Materials Using a Flexible Wall Permeameter (Permeability) ASTM D5084 $610.00 Permeability Additional Cell Time $610.00
Direct Shear Test of Soils Under Consolidated Drained Conditions (per point) ASTM D3080 $610.00 Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils (three points) ASTM D4767 $1,110.00 Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils (added points) ASTM D4767 $385.00 Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils (single point) ASTM D4767 $385.00 Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils (includes 3 points)(includes Pore Pressures) ASTM D4767 $1,960.00
Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils (added points)(includes Pore Pressures) ASTM D4767 $660.00
Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils (single point)(includes Pore Pressures) ASTM D4767 $660.00
Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils (per point) ASTM D2850 $195.00 Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils with added backpressure saturation (per point) ASTM D2850 $325.00
One-Dimensional Consolidation Properties of Soils Using Incremental Loading ASTM D2435 $585.00 Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil ASTM D2166 and CT221 $500.00 Compressive Strength of Molded Soil-Cement Cylinders ASTM D1633 $500.00 Particle-Size Analysis of Soils (with Hydrometer) ASTM D422 $670.00 Particle-Size Analysis of Soils (without Hydrometer) ASTM D422 $610.00 Particle-Size Distribution of Fine Grained Soils using Sedimentation Analysis ASTM D7928 and ASTM D422 $610.00 Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Soils Using Sieve Analysis (2" - No.200) (sample size over 2" QOR) ASTM D6913 $395.00 $100.00
Material Finer than No.200 by Washing (200 Wash) ASTM D1140 $245.00 $100.00 Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils ASTM D4318 and CT204 $610.00 Determination of Organic Soils Classification using Liquid Limit of Soils ASTM D4318/D2487 $785.00 Organic Content of Soils and Peat ASTM D2974 $340.00
Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) Test ASTM D2487 $360.00 Moisture-Density Relations of Soil Using Modified Effort (Modified Proctor) ASTM D1557 $535.00 $350.00 Moisture-Density Relations of Soil Using Standard Effort (Standard Proctor) ASTM D698 $535.00 $350.00 Moisture-Density Relations of Soil Using Modified DWR Method DWR Modified $535.00 Moisture-Density Relations of Soil Using Rapid Compaction Method ASTM D5080 $535.00 Moisture-Density Relations of Soil-Cement Mixtures ASTM D558 $535.00 Moisture-Density Relations of Soil, 1 Point Check Point ASTM D698 $410.00 Moisture-Density Relations of Soil, 2 Point Check Point ASTM D698 $460.00 Moisture-Density Relations of Soil, 3 Point Check Point ASTM D698 $535.00 Moisture-Density Relations of Soil, 1 Point Check Point ASTM D1557 $410.00 Moisture-Density Relations of Soil, 2 Point Check Point ASTM D1557 $460.00 Moisture-Density Relations of Soil, 3 Point Check Point ASTM D1557 $535.00 Maximum Index Density and Unit Weight of Soils Using a Vibratory Table ASTM D4253 $560.00 Minimum Index Density and Unit Weight of Soils and Calculation of Relative Density ASTM D4254 $340.00 Maximum Dry Unit Weight of Granular Soils Using a Vibrating Hammer ASTM D7382 $510.00 Relative Compaction of Untreated and Treated Soils and Aggregates CT216 $610.00 Determining the Resistance "R" Value of Treated and Untreated Bases, Subbases, and Basement Soils by the Stabiliometer ASTM D2844 and CT301 $750.00
Expansion Index of Soils ASTM D4829 $510.00
Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer ASTM D854 $410.00 pH of Soils ASTM D4972 $560.00
Density of Hydraulic Cement ASTM C188 $385.00
Volatile Organic Content EPA 8260B QOR
Semi Volatile Organics by GC/Ms (Basic Target List) EPA 8270C QOR Total Organic Carbon ASTM 2974/EPA 5310Bm QOR
ICP Metals Concentration EPA 6020 - CAM/CCR 17 QOR
Total Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons: TPH, MTBE, Benzene,Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Zylenes, %SS EPA 8015B QOR ICP Metals Concentration EPA 6020 QOR
pH EPA 9045D $610.00
Sequential Batch Extraction of Waste with Acidic Extraction Fluid ASTM D5284 QOR Chromium Soluble EPA 7196A QOR
Caltrans Corrosivity Package $650.00
Determining Field and Laboratory Resistivity and pH Measurements for Soil and Water CT643 QOR Soils and Waters for Sulfate Content CT417 QOR
Soils and Waters for Chloride Content CT422 QOR
Pore Water Extraction and Determination of the Soluble Salt Content of Soils by Refractometer ASTM D4542 $710.00 California Bearing Ratio Test (does not include moisture density relations) ASTM D1883 $750.00 Bentonite Slurry Testing QOR
Unconfined Compressive Strength of Lime Treated Soils and Aggregates CT 373 (4 pts) $1,505.00 Unconfined Compressive Strength of Lime Treated Soils and Aggregates CT 373 (3 pts) $1,130.00

SOILS AND AGGREGATE SERVICES AND TESTS
** Does not include sample preparation or sieve analysis * Unusual sample preparation (dried clays, saturated clays, etc.) and all other tests for treated or untreated soils, aggregate subbase and aggregate base will be charged at established rates for laboratory technician.

All fees subject to Basis of Charges
inspecting
testing
engineering
Standard Discounted
ASPHALT Rate/Each Rate/Each
Thickness/Height of Compacted Bituminous Paving Mixture Specimens Field Cores ASTM D3549 and CT308 $210.00 Bulk Specific Gravity of Compacted Bituminous Mixture (Individual field cores or lab compacted) ASTM D1188, ASTM D2726, CT308, AASHTO $325.00 Lab Compaction Only of Bituminous Mixture by Marshall Apparatus (Marshall) (Per Specimen) ASTM D6926 $325.00 Lab Compaction Only of Bituminous Mixture by CA Kneading Compactor (HVEEM) (Per Specimen) ASTM D1561, CT304, and AASHTO T-247 $325.00 Lab Compaction Only of Bituminous Mixture by Superpave Gyratory (Superpave) (Per Specimen) ASTM D6925, and AASHTO T-312 $325.00 Laboratory Test Max Density (LTMD) (5 Specimen, includes compaction of specimen and bulk specific ASTM D1561/(D1188 and D2726) and $1,160.00 Superpave Bulk specific gravity (includes gyratory compaction of 3 specimen and bulk specific gravity) AASHTO T-312/T-275/T-166 $1,160.00 Marshal Lab Compacted Max Density (3 Specimen, includes compaction of specimen and bulk specific ASTM D6926/(D1188 and D2726) $1,160.00 Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity and Density (Rice) ASTM D2041, CT309, and AASHTO T-209 $510.00 $500.00 Marshall Stability and Flow of Bituminous Mixtures (average Set of 3, includes sample compaction) ASTM D6926/ASTM D6927 $1,160.00 Measuring the Permeability of Bituminous Pavements and Seal Coats CT341 QOR Swell of Bituminous Mixtures CT305 $450.00
Moisture Vapor Susceptibility of Bituminous Mixtures/Moisture or Volatile Distillates in Asphalt ASTM D1461 and CT307 $1,010.00 Stabilometer Value of field compacted cores (Per Specimen) ASTM D1560, CT366, and AASHTO T-246 $455.00 Stabilometer Value of Lab compacted samples (Average of 3 Specimen, Includes Sample Compaction) ASTM D1561/D1560, CT304/CT366, and $1,160.00 Determination of Asphalt Content of Bituminous Paving Mixtures by the Ignition Method ASTM D6307, CT382, and AASHTO T-308 $460.00 Determination of Correction Factor of Bituminous Paving Mixtures by the Ignition Method ASTM D6307, CT382, and AASHTO T-308 $1,500.00 Quantitative Extraction of Bitumen from Bituminous Paving Mixtures (Solvent) ASTM D2172 and CT310 $810.00 Mechanical Size Analysis (Coarse and Fine) of Extracted Aggregate (Afterburn Gradation) ASTM D5444, CT202, and AASHTO T-30 $460.00 Moisture Content of Bituminous Mixture CT370 and AASHTO T-329 $485.00 Effect of Water on Compressive Strength of Compacted Bituminous Mixtures (Set of 6) ASTM D1075 $3,710.00 Compressive Strength of Bituminous Mixtures ASTM D1074 $360.00 Hamburg Wheel Track (includes compaction by gyratory)(includes 2 runs) AASHTO T324 $4,010.00 Tensile Strength Ratio (TSR) Moisture Susceptibility (includes compaction of 6 Specimen ASTM D4867 and AASHTO T-283 $4,010.00 Tensile Strength Ratio (TSR) Moisture Susceptibility (includes compaction of 12 Specimen) CT371 $6,010.00 Indirect Tensile (IDT) Strength of Bituminous Mixtures ASTM D6931 $3,760.00 Air Voids Calculation of Compacted Bituminous Mixture ASTM D3203, CT367, and AASHTO T-269 $225.00 PG Verification (Determining Low Temperature Performance Grade (PG) of Asphalt Binders) ASTM 6816 QOR

MATERIALS MECHANICAL TESTS
Mechanical Testing of Steel Products (General Tensile) ASTM A370 $560.00 Fillet Weld Break Test for Qualification (Welding) AWS B4.0 $260.00 Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, Tension Testing Wrought and Cast Aluminum and Magnesium-Alloy ASTM E8, B557 and AWS B4.0 $560.00 Mechanical Testing of Steel Products (Couplers); #3-#11 ASTM A370 $750.00 Mechanical Testing of Steel Products (Couplers); #14+ ASTM A370 $1,500.00 Impact Testing of Miniaturized Charpy V-Notch Specimens, Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic ASTM E2248 and ASTM E23 QOR Testing, Practices, and Terminology for Chemical Analysis of Steel Products ASTM A751 $385.00 Mechanical Testing of Steel Products & Bend Testing of Material for Ductility; #3-#8 ASTM A370 and E290 $450.00 Mechanical Testing of Steel Products & Bend Testing of Material for Ductility; #9-#11 ASTM A370 and E290 $510.00 Mechanical Testing of Steel Products & Bend Testing of Material for Ductility; #14+ ASTM A370 and E290 $1,500.00 Mechanical Testing of Steel Products, Standard Specification for Steel Wire, Plain, for Concrete ASTM A370, A82 and A185 $510.00 Guided Bend Test for Ductility of Welds, Mechanical Testing of Welds ASTM E190 and AWS B4.0 $360.00 Determining the Mechanical Properties of Externally and Internally Threaded Fasteners, Anchor Bolts Only ASTM F307, F1554 and F606 $610.00 Rockwell Hardness of Metallic Materials ASTM E18 $195.00 Proof Test for Carbon and Alloy Steel (Nuts Only) ASTM A194 or A563 $385.00 Radiographic Examination of Metallic Castings/Weldments ASTM E94, E1030 and E1032 QOR Macroetching Metals and Alloys ASTM E340, E381 and AWS $385.00 Determining the Mechanical Properties of Externally and Internally Threaded Fasteners, Washers, Direct ASTM F606 $435.00 Mechanical Testing of Steel Products (Terminators Tensile) ASTM A370 $435.00 Strength for Sewn or Bonded Seams of Geotextiles ASTM D4884 $385.00 Tearing Strength of Fabrics by the Tongue (Single Rip) Procedure ASTM D2261 $385.00 Breaking Strength and Elongation of Textile Fabrics (Grab Test) ASTM D5034 $335.00 Tensile Properties of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite Bars ASTM D3039 $1,060.00 Steel Strand, Uncoated Seven-Wire for Prestressed Concrete (Set of 2) ASTM A416 and A1061 $1,610.00

FIREPROOFING
Thickness and Density of Sprayed Fire-Resistive Material (SFRM) ASTM E605 $305.00 Cohesion/Adhesion of Sprayed Fire-Resistive Materials (Test Kit Only) ASTM E736 $95.00

CONTACT INFORMATION
Headquarters: 2118 Rheem Drive • Pleasanton, CA 94588 • P 925.462.5151 • F 925.462.5183 Peninsula: 1793 Union Street • San Francisco, CA 94123 • P 415.334.4747 • F 415.438.2357 Oakland: 246 30th Street, Suite 101 • Oakland, CA 94601 • P 510.444.4747 • F 510.835.1825 Stockton: 343 East Main Street, #711 • Stockton, CA 95202 • P 209.507.7555 • F 209.507.7554 Rocklin: 4400 Yankee Hill Road • Rocklin, CA 95677 • P 916.419.4747 • F 916.419.4774 Las Vegas: 3842 E. Post Road • Las Vegas, NV 89120 • P 702.257.4747 • F 702.257.4718

ASPHALTIC CONCRETE SERVICES AND TESTS

MECHANICAL TESTS AND FIREPROOFING
San Jose: 2033 Gateway Place, #500 • San Jose, CA 95110 • P 408.573.6992 • F 408.437.1201 All fees subject to Basis of Charges
Lawrence David (Dave) Irby
Senior Construction Inspector
1 of 2
Experience Summary
Dave is a construction manager/inspector with more than 40 years of experience in underground utility construction and related industries. He excels in project management, estimating and all related field duties, including but not limited to, electric conduit systems, natural gas pipelines, telecom, and broadband systems. He brings expertise in excavation and placement of underground utility vaults for electric and communication. Crew Leadership, Supervision, and work coordination.

Dave’s background includes 12 years of facilities project inspections (including SMUD remodels & Roofing construction). He has a strong ability to read and interpret plans and specifications. His experience serving in various roles on construction projects has made him adept at collaborating with public agencies, municipalities, and utility companies, always working proactively to resolve issues before they arise and ensuring that projects are completed on time and on budget.

Select Project Experience
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Various Construction Projects
Supervisor - Construction Management Inspection
Dave was a direct supervisor over 12 full-time SMUD CMls (Construction Management Inspectors) and served as the Contract Manager of three outside consultant contracts for construction inspection, used to augment staffing needs. The contracts utilized up to 15 Contract Inspectors.

Dave worked closely with Project Managers and upper management assuring all inspection needs were met with qualified personnel. He worked directly with SMUD Engineers to resolve conflicts with projects in the field.

Sacramento Municipal Utility District / Various Construction Projects Construction Management Inspector (CMI) lll / Lead Inspector Dave was responsible for project scheduling and tracking, which included Coaching/Mentoring and CMI work coordination. He oversaw onsite inspections and provided support to SMUD Project Managers and Engineers. Projects included
• The East Commerce Substation
• Expansion of the Powerline Elkhorn Substation,
• 20" Gas Pipeline relocations in Freeport and Davis,
Experience
40 + years
Education
Casa Robles High School
Skills
• Project Management
• Supervision
• Coaching, Mentoring, & Training
• Contract Management
• Crew Safety
• Work Coordination & Scheduling
Training
• CPR and First Aid
• Airborne Toxic Control Measures
• Asbestos/Lead/Confined Space
• Respiratory Protection/Fit Test
• SWPP (Storm Water Pollution
Prevention)
Training and Seminars
• Switchyard Safety
O
S
H
A
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
f
o
r
E
x
c
a
v
a
t
2 of 2
Dave Irby
• Installation of new fire line around the District Headquarters building. • oversight and inspections of the civil portion of the New SF6 230 KV system at the Elk Grove Substation.
• Internal line inspection on SMUD's 72 miles of gas main and main line valve replacements, • Construction of survey and testing platforms on the Camino Penstock. • Tracer wire placement in the fiber optic conduit and pull boxes along the 800C gas pipeline route.
• Ongoing training in inspection techniques and safety
Valley Utility Services, Sacramento CA
Utility Construction Foreman
Dave started as an equipment operator then after 4 years took the position of Foreman, installing dry utilities - Underground Electric, Gas, phone and Cable TV. He ran multiple jobs concurrently from beginning to finish, including, layout of trenches, excavation, piping and installation of utilities, placing utility vaults, backfill and mechanical compaction, supervising crews numbering from 5 to 25.

His projects include the Pacific Gas and Electric Transmission Main installation to the Wheeler Ranch development in Plumas Lake. The project scope included excavation, installation backfill and compaction of 7600' of 8" gas main to the requirements and specifications of state and local agencies along with PG&E's guidelines. This included one bore 26' below an adjacent canal with a tie in depth of 17'. Speed shores and shoring boxes were required. Dave was responsible for the completion and release of jobs by governing agencies.

ADDITIONAL WORK HISTORY
FOREMAN & EQUIPMENT OPERATOR - Onsite Environmental
• Tank installs, re-piping of fuel system at Reno Air National Guard, bomb removal at the Roseville Railyard FIELD SUPERVISOR/ESTIMATOR - Ramos Environmental Engineering • Tank installs /removal, Soil remediation, Emergency response FOREMAN/EQUIPMENT OPERATOR - Ramcon
• Tank installs/removals Soil remediation
FOREMAN/ESTIMATOR- Envirotox Technologies
• Tank Installs/removal, Soil remediation

CONSTRUCTION KNOWLEDGE
• Read and understand Blueprints/Estimating,
• Shoot Grade,
• Oversee and run crews in a professional and productive manner, • Operate Excavator, Backhoe, Dozer, Dump truck, Water truck, and Wheel loader.

Guy Howes, PE
Plan Review Engineer / Resident Engineer
1 of 1
Experience Summary
Guy Howes is a California professional engineer, Caltrans certified, and Qualified SWPPP practitioner (QSP) with 27 years of public sector construction project experience.

Guy has managed municipal facility and Public Works Projects including major roadway infrastructure, as well as development and capital improvement projects for the City of Roseville. He provided oversight for inspectors, engineering staff, and various contracts set forth by the city.

Guy’s project experience includes sidewalk replacements, arterial roadway resurfacing, highway off-ramp retrofits, and overlay projects. Guy is compassionate and dedicated to working well with interdisciplinary teams of engineers, surveyors, contractors, and developers to obtain successful outcomes.

Select Project Experience
Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) – Multiple Projects/Construction Inspection Construction Inspector
Guy is currently providing construction inspection services for 4LEAF’s On Call Inspection Services contract with SMUD providing as needed construction inspection on multiple utility projects including a gas pipeline cathode coating project, SMUD access road repair projects, as well as substation and switchyard projects.

City of Roseville – PG&E Pipeline 123 Replacement
Public Works Construction Manager
Guy served as the Construction Manager for the City of Roseville on this Pacific Gas and Electric pipeline project.

As part of its Pipeline Safety and Enhancement Plan, PG&E replaced approximately 3.1 linear miles of their natural gas transmission Line 123 through residential subdivisions. The new 16-inch steel pipeline more than doubles current capacity of the existing 12-inch-diameter steel pipeline.

City of Roseville
Senior Civil Engineer
Guy was the Senior Civil Engineer at the City of Roseville for 12 years. In that time, Guy managed the Development Services Department Construction Inspector Staff, and was responsible for overseeing the City’s inspectors. In addition, Guy managed the Community Facility District projects for major roadway infrastructure with specific plans throughout the City. He administered professional construction management and geotechnical engineering contracts. Guy also established, managed, and amended City Design and Construction standards during this time.

Experience
27 years
Education
B.S. Engineering Technology
(Construction Management)
California State University, Sacramento
Certifications
California Professional Engineer in Civil
Engineering, C80808
Qualified SWPPP Practitioner (QSP)
General Building Contractor, CA
442858
Training
Caltrans:

Project Engineer Academy
RE Water Pollution Cntl Compliance
University of California:

Inspection Practice
Field Supervision - Public Works
Safety - Construction Zone

City Council Agenda Item #6
Staff Report
Date: October 21, 2024
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Elisa Arteaga, City Administrator
Subject: City of Gridley Cash Investment Policy
Recommended Action
Staff respectfully requests the City Council approve and adopt the City of Gridley Cash Investment Policy.

Purpose
The purpose of this report is to recommend the approval of the City’s proposed Cash Investment Policy, which is designed to optimize the management and investment of the City’s available funds while ensuring safety, liquidity, and yield. Municipalities often have significant amounts of public funds that are not immediately required for operational expenses. In order to maximize the value of these funds for the benefit of the City and its residents, it is crucial to establish a well-defined Cash Investment Policy. The proposed policy outlines the guidelines for investing the City’s idle cash in various short-term and long-term financial instruments, ensuring that public funds are managed with a balance of safety, liquidity, and yield. The approval of the City’s Cash Investment Policy will allow the City to manage its financial resources more effectively and efficiently, ensuring that public funds are invested safely and productively.

Background
On October 7th, 2024 Council approved the Agreement with Meeder Investment Group, an agency that specializes in delivering personalized, hands-on investment portfolios for public agencies. In order to establish this process and move forward with investments as outlined in the agreement, the City should have a cash investment policy. Furthermore, the investment policy was previously reviewed by the city auditors and there were no concerns with the policy and to ensure proper oversight, routine reporting on investment performance will be provided to City Council.

Financial Impact
The adoption of this policy is expected to result in increased investment income, though specific estimates will vary based on market conditions and investment strategies. The City will benefit from additional revenue with minimal operational costs associated with policy implementation.

Compliance with City Council Strategic Plan or Budget Goals The policy provides clear guidelines for investment activities, improving transparency and accountability in the management of public funds. This recommendation is consistent with our ongoing effort to be responsive and transparent regarding all business transactions and financial matters.

Attachment: 1. City of Gridley Cash Investment Policy Draft X Regular
Special
Closed
Emergency
City of Gridley, CA Investment Policy
It is the Policy of the City of Gridley, to invest public funds in a manner that will provide in priority order, maximum security, adequate liquidity, and sufficient yield while meeting the daily cash flow demands of the City and conforming to California Government Code Section 53600, and related statutes and regulations governing the investment of public funds.

Purpose
This statement is intended to provide guidelines for prudent investment of the City of Gridley’stemporary inactive cash and outline the policies for maximizing the efficiency of the City’s cash management system.

The City’s ultimate investment goal is to invest public funds in a manner that will provide the highest investment return with the maximum security while meeting the short and long-term cash flow demands and conforming to all state statutes governing the investment of public funds.

Scope
The Investment Policy covers all City funds.

Prudence
The standard of prudence to be used by the investment official shall be the “prudent investor standard” as outlined in California Government Code Section 53600.3. It shall be applied in the context of managing the overall portfolio.

The City’s Finance Director will maintain and update investment policies and procedures. The procedures intend to ensure that the investment objectives and safeguards stated in this Policy are effectively communicated to all officials involved in the investment of public funds and adequately reflect the intent of the “Prudent Investor” rule. The procedures will be maintained on file with the City Treasurer and the Finance Director.

Objectives
The primary objectives, in order of priority, of the City’s investment activities shall be:
a. Safety. It shall be the primary duty and responsibility of those authorized to invest the City’s funds to protect, preserve, and maintain cash and investments placed in trust on behalf of the citizens of the City. Diversification is allowed within the guidelines of California Government Code Section 53601
b. Liquidity. An adequate amount of funds shall be maintained in liquid short-term securities, which can be converted to cash to meet disbursement requirements. Since all cash requirements cannot be anticipated, investments in securities with active secondary or resale markets will be used. Emphasis will be on marketable securities with low sensitivity to market risk.
c. Yield. The investment pools and funds shall be managed to attain the maximum rate of return given the constraints of the safety guidelines and liquidity objectives as mentioned above.

Delegation of Authority and Responsibilities:

In accordance with the State of California Government Code section 53607, the City Council has delegated the authority to invest with the City’s Finance Director.

Within the constraints set forth in the Policy, the Finance Director can direct investment strategy and approve investment transactions for the City's investment portfolio. The Finance Director who oversees treasurer functions for the city is responsible for the following:
• Developing projections of the City's cash requirements for operating needs. • Reviewing the liquidity position of the investment portfolio. • Ensuring that the City's cash position is consistent with operating requirements. • Preparing appropriate investment reports.
• Developing, implementing, and monitoring controls over investments. • Record keeping for investment transactions.

Investment Manager: The City may engage the services of an external investment management adviser to assist in managing the City’s investment portfolio in a manner consistent with the City’s objectives. Such advisers may be granted discretion to purchase and sell investment securities in accordance with the Policy. Such advisers must be registered with the Security and Exchange Commission and possess experience in public funds investment management. All broker/dealers selected by an external adviser must comply with the requirements of California Government Code Section 53601.5.

Ethics and Conflicts of Interest
Officers and employees involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activity that could conflict with the proper execution of the investment program or impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions. Employees and investment officials shall comply with the disclosure and disqualification requirements required by state law and any applicable regulations, including those adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission or FPPC. In addition, the FPPC’s Statement of Economic Interests (Form 700) shall be completed annually and submitted to the City Clerk for all individuals involved in the investment of public funds.

Internal Controls
Internal controls shall be established and maintained to prevent losses of public funds arising from fraud, employee error, misrepresentation by third parties, or imprudent actions by employees and officers of the City.

Controls deemed most significant include segregation of duties, separation of transaction authority from accounting and record keeping, custodial safekeeping, clear delegation of authority, specific limitations regarding securities losses and remedial action, control over wire transfers, minimizing the number of authorized investment officials, and documentation of transactions and strategies.

The Finance Director shall establish an annual independent review process by an external auditor. This review will provide internal control by assuring compliance with the policies and procedures outlined in this document.?
Permitted Investment Instruments are those listed below and as amended – Including but not limited to the following:

Investment Type Maximum
Maturity
Maximum % of the
portfolio
Minimum Quality
Requirements
Gov’t Code
Sections
Local Agency Bonds 5 years None None 53601(a)
U.S. Treasury Obligations 5 years None None 53601(b)
State Obligations – CA and Others 5 Years None None 53601 (c) 53601(d)
CA Local Agency Obligations 5 years None None 53601 (e) US Agency Obligations 5 years Non None 53601 (f)
Bankers’s Acceptances 180 days 40% None 53601 (g)
Commercial Paper – Non-Pooled Funds
(under $100,000,000 of investments)
270 days or
less
25% Highest letter and
number rating by an
NRSRO
53601(h)(2)(c)
Commercial Paper Pooled Funds 270 days or
less
40% Highest letter and
number rating by an
NRSRO
53635(a)(1)
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 5 years 30% None 53601 (i) Non-Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 5 years None None 53630 et seq.

Placement Service Deposits 5 years 50% None 53601.8 and 53635.8
Repurchase Agreements 1 year None None 53601 (j)
Medium-Term Notes 5 years 30% “A” rating or its
equivalent or better
53601 (o)
Mutual Funds and Money Market
Mutual Funds
N/A 20% Multiple 53601 (I) and
53601.6 (b)
Collateralized Bank Deposits 5 years None None 53630 et seq. and 53601 (n)
Mortgage Pass-Through and AssetBacked Securities 5 years 20% “AA” rating or its equivalent or better
53601 (o)
County Pool Investment Funds N/A None None 27133
Joint Powers Authority Pool N/A None Multiple 53601 (p) Local Agency Investment Fund N/A None None 16429.1
Voluntary Investment Program Fund N/A None None 16340
Supranational Obligations 5 years 30% “AA” or its equivalent or better
53601 (q)
No more than 5% of the total portfolio may be invested in securities of any single issuer other than the US government, its agencies, and instrumentalities.

If the issuer's rating is reduced below the rating requirements mentioned above, the investment advisor must, as soon as possible, report the rating reduction to the local government's governing body.

Portfolio Management
Following the primary objective of capital preservation, investments shall be managed to take advantage of market opportunities. In doing so, negotiable securities may be sold before maturity to provide liquid funds as needed for cash flow purposes to enhance portfolio returns or to restructure maturities to increase yield and/or decrease risk.

Purchases and Sales of Securities
All trades shall be executed with the objective of realizing the best bid or offer price available. The method used by the investment personnel and investment advisors shall be the one that will obtain the best execution price or value given the objective of the transaction.

Performance Standards
The investment portfolio shall be designed to obtain a rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles commensurate with the investment risk constraints and the cash flow needs.

Custody and Delivery Vs. Payment
Delivery vs. Payment: All Trades of marketable securities will be executed by delivery vs. payment (DVP) to ensure that securities are deposited in an eligible financial institution before the release of funds.

Custody: Securities will be held by a third-party custodian selected by the City and evidenced by custodial reports. Securities will be registered in the name of Gridley, California.

Reporting
The Finance Director or his/her designee shall maintain investment reports showing the current holdings and transactions of the portfolio.
• Percentages of the portfolio represented by each investment category. • An investment inventory including types and amounts of investments, issuing financial institutions, and maturities.
• A list of all investment transactions that occurred during the reporting month. • Average maturity of the portfolio.
• Average total yield to maturity of the portfolio
• Current market value of investments
• Percent of portfolio invested by type of instrument.
• Written explanations for any variations to the Policy.

Approval
The City’s Council shall adopt the City’s Investment Policy. The Policy shall be reviewed annually by the Finance Director, City Administrator, and external investment service provider.

City Council Agenda Item #7
Staff Report
Date: October 21, 2024
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Elisa Arteaga, City Administrator
Subject: Taxing Agency Compensation Agreements for Former Redevelopment Agency Property Sales
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Gridley City Council approve the attached “form of” templates for Taxing Agency Compensation Agreements (“Agreements”) and authorize staff to negotiate with taxing agencies that receive a share of sales proceeds from former City of Gridley Redevelopment Agency (“Redevelopment Agency”) property sales based on the terms in the Agreements.

Background
The City of Gridley Redevelopment Agency (“Redevelopment Agency”) dissolved in 2012 following the statewide dissolution of redevelopment. In 2015, the Successor Agency to the City of Gridley Redevelopment Agency (“Successor Agency”) prepared a Long-Range Property Management Plan (““LRPMP”) describing its plan to use or dispose of five properties owned by the Redevelopment Agency. The California Department of Finance (“DOF”) approved the proposed use or disposition of all properties in the LRPMP on December 31, 2015.

Figure 1 displays a map of each LRPMP property, which were subdivided into ten Industrial Park parcels. Table 1 summarizes the proposed use and sales status of each parcel.

X Regular
Special
Closed
Emergency
Figure 1: Industrial Park Recorded Map with LRPMP Overlay Table 1: LRPMP Approved Use and Sales Status
LRPMP
Parcel
Industrial
Park
Parcel No.

LRPMP
Approved Use
LRPMP
Detailed Use
Proposed Use as of 2024 Required Action and Status Surplus Land Act
Disposition
Approved
Parcel
A
Parcel 11 Governmental
use
City well Governmental use – City
well
Record quit claim deed
transferring ownership to City.

Pending recordation.
n/a, public
use
Parcel
1 Parcel 10 Sell Sell Hansen/CAT PSA
$277,121.84
7-21-23
Butte Countywide Oversight
Board (“Oversight Board”)
approved PSA and preparing
to close escrow
Yes
Parcel
2A
Parcel 3 Sell File parcel
map
Obtain prelim
title reports
and
appraisals
Sell with
approval of
Oversight
Board
For sale Yes
Parcel 4 For sale Yes
Parcel 5 For sale Yes
Parcel 2 PSA Dhami
$249,402.78
9-25-23
Yes
Parcel 1 Governmental Use – Retain
for storm water discharge
Oversight Board approved Quit
Claim Deed to transfer
ownership to City for $0 as a
governmental use. Pending
recordation.
n/a, public
use
Table 1: LRPMP Approved Use and Sales Status
LRPMP
Parcel
Industrial
Park
Parcel No.

LRPMP
Approved Use
LRPMP
Detailed Use
Proposed Use as of 2024 Required Action and Status Surplus Land Act
Disposition
Approved
Parcel is required to provide
storm water discharge for all
Industrial Park development.

Note Parcel 8 was originally
intended to be retained for
future development as a
transit facility (park & ride)
and is now proposed for sale.

Parcel
2B
Parcel 7 Retain for
future
development
Corporation
Yard
City Corporate Yard Record quit claim deed
transferring ownership to City.

Pending recordation.

Negotiate taxing agency
compensation agreements
allowing City to retain for $0 to
carry out use approved in
LRPMP
Note taxing entities must
agree to purchase price
n/a, public
use
Parcel 6 Community
Park
Gridley Sports Complex
Phase 1
Grant Deed to City and
Deed Restriction 3-12-24
n/a, public
use
Table 1: LRPMP Approved Use and Sales Status
LRPMP
Parcel
Industrial
Park
Parcel No.

LRPMP
Approved Use
LRPMP
Detailed Use
Proposed Use as of 2024 Required Action and Status Surplus Land Act
Disposition
Approved
Parcel 9 Transit facility
park & ride
City Corporate Yard Record quit claim deed
transferring ownership to City.

Pending recordation.

Negotiate taxing agency
compensation agreements
allowing City to retain for $0 as
a governmental use as
approved in the LRPMP
Although not a transit facility,
it is a governmental use as
intended by the LRPMP
n/a, public
use
Parcel 8 Transit facility
park & ride
PSA Pamma
$307,620.72
9-6-23
Record quit claim deed
transferring ownership to City.

Pending recordation.

Negotiate taxing agency
compensation agreements
allowing City to sell for market
value per PSA
Yes
Taxing Agency Compensation Agreements
DOF approved LRPMP Parcel 2B, now known as Industrial Park Parcels 6-9, to be retained by the City for future development as a corporation yard, community park for organized sports, and transit facility. The LRPMP stated, “no other properties within the city are available for purchase, nor is the city in a position to purchase due to budget shortfalls.” The LRPMP notes that Gridley is a Disadvantaged Community whose population is underserved with respect to park space. The LRPMP stated the City will pursue and execute a compensation agreement with taxing entities.

The City will record a Quit Claim Deed to transfer ownership of Parcels 6-9 from the Redevelopment Agency to the City.

Industrial Park Parcels 6, 7 and 9
The City plans to retain Parcels 6, 7, and 9 as governmental uses as intended by the LRPMP:
• Parcel 6 will serve as a City sports complex as approved in the LRPMP. The City has executed a Grant Deed and Deed Restriction dated March 12, 2024 transferring ownership to the City and restricting use as a sports complex to comply with grant funding from the California Department of Parks and Recreation.
• Parcel 7 will serve as a City Corporation Yard as approved in the LRPMP. • Parcel 9 will serve as a City Corporation Yard. The City and County of Butte had previously negotiated a land swap for Parcel 9 to serve as a County Corporation Yard, however, the County cancelled the agreement. The City now plans to retain the property as a City Corporation Yard, which is a public use as intended by the LRPMP.

The City will need to negotiate taxing agency compensation agreements with each affected taxing entity that receives a share of property tax from the properties. The City will propose retaining Parcels 6, 7, and 9 for $0 to carry out the governmental uses intended by the LRPMP. Each taxing agency will need to agree to the proposed $0 transfer. Compensation agreements do not require Oversight Board approval however they need to be approved by each taxing agency’s governing board.

If taxing agencies do not agree to transferring the properties to the City for $0, the City will need to negotiate a new sales price or plan to dispose of the properties.

Industrial Park Parcel 8
The LRPMP approved retaining Industrial Park Parcel 8 for future development, which was originally intended to be a transit facility park and ride. The City now proposes selling Parcel 8 for fair market value.

The City will need to negotiate taxing agency compensation agreements to sell Parcel 8 for $307,620.72 pursuant to a Purchase and Sale Agreement dated September 6, 2023. The proposed Agreement distributes net sales proceeds based on each affected taxing agency’s Assembly Bill 8 property tax share. See Table 2 for each taxing agency’s share for 2023-24.

Table 2: Taxing Agency Shares of Net Sales Proceeds
Note: If implementing a taxing agency compensation agreement, Net Sales Proceeds (after deducting sales costs such as escrow fees) are distributed to taxing agencies directly by the City. If implementing a PSA for LRPMP properties approved for sale, Net Sales Proceeds are remitted to the County Auditor-Controller to distribute to taxing agencies.

Source: Butte County Auditor-Controller, RSG
The prospective buyer has extended escrow to wait for taxing agency approval. They also have the option to cancel the sale and reclaim their $10,000 deposit. The City Attorney has advised the PSA does not hold the City liable for costs of canceling the sale other than returning the deposit.

Fiscal Impact
Approval of the recommended action will allow City staff to negotiate retaining three parcels for $0 as a governmental use and receive $39,033 for the sale of Industrial Park Parcel 8. This is subject to approval by all taxing agencies and their governing boards.

Compliance with City Council Strategic LRPMP or Budget Goals This recommendation is consistent with the Long Range Property Management Plan and our ongoing effort to be responsive and transparent regarding all business transactions and financial matters.

Attachments

1. Form of Compensation Agreement Gridley Industrial Park Parcels 6, 7 & 9

2. Form of Compensation Agreement Gridley Industrial Park Parcel 8 Gridley/Taxing Agency Compensation Agreement Page 1

FORM OF

COMPENSATION AGREEMENT
GRIDLEY INDUSTRIAL PARK PARCEL 8
This COMPENSATION AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of _______________________, 2024 (the “Effective Date”), by and between CITY OF GRIDLEY, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and the [DISTRICT], a political subdivision of the State of California (“[District]”).

RECITALS
A. The City of Gridley Redevelopment Agency (the “Redevelopment Agency”) was activated by the City Council of the City of Gridley (the "City Council") as a redevelopment agency under the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.).

B. On June 28, 2011, the California Legislature enacted, and the Governor signed, Assembly Bill 26 from the 2011-12 First Extraordinary Session of the California Legislature (“ABx1 26”) to dissolve all redevelopment agencies in the State of California.

ABx1 26 added a new Part 1.85 to Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code (Health and Safety Code Section 34170 et seq.; the “Dissolution Law”).

C. On XXX, 2012 by Resolution No. XXX, and pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34173, the City Council declared that the City of Gridley (the “City”) would act as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency (the “Successor Agency”).

On February 1, 2012, the Redevelopment Agency was dissolved.

D. On June 27, 2012, the California Legislature enacted, and the Governor signed, Assembly Bill 1484 (“AB 1484”), which, among other things, made certain revisions to the Dissolution Law.

E. The Successor Agency is a separate public entity and is responsible for taking certain actions pursuant to the Dissolution Law.

F. The Butte County Consolidated Oversight Board (“Oversight Board”) has been established to oversee and approve certain actions taken by the Successor Agency in connection with the winding down of the affairs of the former Redevelopment Agency.

G. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34191.5, added by AB 1484, the Successor Agency prepared a Long-Range Property Management Plan (“LRPMP”) addressing the disposition and use of the real property owned by the Redevelopment Agency. The Redevelopment Agency had purchased property located near the southeast boarder of the City along the Southern Pacific Railway to create an industrial park to strengthen industrial opportunities and job expansion in the City (“Industrial Park”). The LRPMP properties include Parcel A retained for government use, Parcel 1 designated for Gridley/Taxing Agency Compensation Agreement Page 2
sale, Parcel 2A designated for sale, and Parcel 2B retained for future development. The LRPMP was approved by the Oversight Board on December 29, 2015 by Resolution No. 2015-OC-004 and duly submitted to the California Department of Finance (“DOF”) in accordance with Section 34191.5. A map of the LRPMP properties can be found in Exhibit A, Figure 1.

H. DOF, by letter dated December 31, 2015, approved the LRPMP, inclusive of the request to transfer the Agency Property to the City for future development provided it reaches compensation agreements with all the affected taxing entities pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34180(f)(1).

I. The LRPMP stated a parcel map would be created, further subdividing the parcels. A map of the subdivided parcels can be found in Exhibit A, Figure 2. The parcels make up the Industrial Park.

J. Parcel 8 on the Industrial Park parcel map, formerly a portion of LRPMP Parcel 2B, was retained by the City for future development and requires compensation agreements to be executed with all affected taxing agencies who receive a share of property tax from the property pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34191.5(c)(2)(A)(iii).

K. The City seek to rejuvenate the Industrial Park area and are in negotiations to sell Parcel 8 (APN 021-270-048) (the “Agency Property”) to a private party, Simrendeep Singh Pamma (the "Developer") at market value pursuant to a California Commercial Real Estate Purchase Agreement (“Sales Agreement”) dated September 6, 2023. The Sales Agreement is provided as Exhibit B.

L. According to the City, the sale of the underutilized Agency Property is critical to creation of the Industrial park.

M. The City believes that the sale of the Agency Property directly to the Developer will, if approved through compensation agreements with all of the affected taxing entities, satisfy the recommendations of DOF.

N. The taxing entities that receive “residual distributions” through the redevelopment agency dissolution process under Dissolution Law and that would receive a portion of the sale proceeds if the Agency Property were to be sold at fair market value (hereinafter the "affected taxing entities") are listed, together with their respective pro rata shares of such distribution(s), in Exhibit C, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; the [District]’s share is identified as "[Label in Attachment]”.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, which are incorporated herein by this reference, and the mutual promises in this Agreement, the parties agree as follows:

Gridley/Taxing Agency Compensation Agreement Page 3
Section 1. The City asserts and represents that each of the foregoing recitals, and each of the following, are true and accurate statements:
a. Exhibit C lists the affected taxing entities and their respective pro rata shares of property tax revenues from property within the boundaries of the Gridley Redevelopment Project Area, as provided by the AuditorController of the County of Butte (“Auditor-Controller”). b. The estimated incremental increase in the distribution to be derived by the [District] as an affected taxing entity as a result of the sale of the Agency Property at fair market value is $XXX, as set forth in the column of Exhibit C titled “Parcel 8,” which Exhibit is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
c. The estimated fair market value of the Agency Property, Parcel 8, as of the effective date of this Agreement is $307,620.72.

Section 2. a. The [District] approves the sale of the Agency Property to the Developer for development for the sum of $307,620.72 ("disposition price"), provided that the Agency Property is developed as part of the Industrial Park as contemplated by the City and the Developer. The [District] understands that the compensation to the [District] from the contribution of the Agency Property will consist of increased property tax revenues to be derived from development of the Industrial Park (as estimated in Exhibit C). The [District] further understands (i) that the estimates provided in Exhibit C are based on information provided by the Auditor-Controller as to the identity of the affected taxing entities and their respective pro rata shares, (ii) that the estimates provided in Exhibit C are based on certain assumptions applying the disposition price as the property value, which will be an increase from the current assessed value of $0 as a City-owned property, and (iii) that the City cannot and is not making any guarantee that the [District] will receive any specific amount of increased property tax revenues. b. If, for any reason, Developer and City determine to increase the disposition price for the sale of the Agency Property to an amount greater than the stated disposition price ("alternate disposition price"), the City hereby agrees that the [District] shall receive its pro rata share of the net proceeds, if any, resulting from the sale of the Agency Property at the approved alternate disposition price in accordance with applicable provisions of the Dissolution Law.

Section 3. The Parties acknowledge and agree that they are entering into this Agreement to satisfy the requirement presented by DOF to the effect that the City enters into a compensation agreement with each of the affected taxing entities.

Section 4.
a. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same Agreement.
b. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed Commented [A1]: Update with the applicable agency name and share based on the remittance worksheet.

Gridley/Taxing Agency Compensation Agreement Page 4
and enforced in accordance with, the internal laws of the State of California, without regard to conflict of law principles.
c. No Assignments. This Agreement may not be assigned by any of the parties hereto.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Compensation Agreement between the City and the [District] is effective as of the day and year first above written.

CITY
By: __________________________
Title: _________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: __________________________
Title: _________________________
[DISTRICT]
By: __________________________ ATTEST
Title: _________________________ By: ___________________________ Clerk of Said Board
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: __________________________
Title: _________________________
Gridley/Taxing Agency Compensation Agreement Page 5

EXHIBIT A

LONG RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN AND GRIDLEY INDUSTRIAL PARK MAPS Figure 1: LRPMP Lot Map Figure 2: Industrial Park Recorded Map with LRPMP Overlay Gridley/Taxing Agency Compensation Agreement Page 6

EXHIBIT B
Sales Agreement Commented [A2]: Insert
Gridley/Taxing Agency Compensation Agreement Page 7

EXHIBIT C
Taxing Agency Shares
Gridley/Taxing Agency Compensation Agreement Page 1

FORM OF

COMPENSATION AGREEMENT
GRIDLEY INDUSTRIAL PARK PARCELS 6, 7 & 9
This COMPENSATION AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of _______________________, 2024 (the “Effective Date”), by and between CITY OF GRIDLEY, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and the [DISTRICT], a political subdivision of the State of California (“[District]”).

RECITALS
A. The City of Gridley Redevelopment Agency (the “Redevelopment Agency”) was activated by the City Council of the City of Gridley (the "City Council") as a redevelopment agency under the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.).

B. On June 28, 2011, the California Legislature enacted, and the Governor signed, Assembly Bill 26 from the 2011-12 First Extraordinary Session of the California Legislature (“ABx1 26”) to dissolve all redevelopment agencies in the State of California.

ABx1 26 added a new Part 1.85 to Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code (Health and Safety Code Section 34170 et seq.; the “Dissolution Law”).

C. On XXX, 2012 by Resolution No. XXX, and pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34173, the City Council declared that the City of Gridley (the “City”) would act as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency (the “Successor Agency”).

On February 1, 2012, the Redevelopment Agency was dissolved.

D. On June 27, 2012, the California Legislature enacted, and the Governor signed, Assembly Bill 1484 (“AB 1484”), which, among other things, made certain revisions to the Dissolution Law.

E. The Successor Agency is a separate public entity and is responsible for taking certain actions pursuant to the Dissolution Law.

F. The Butte County Consolidated Oversight Board (“Oversight Board”) has been established to oversee and approve certain actions taken by the Successor Agency in connection with the winding down of the affairs of the former Redevelopment Agency.

G. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 34191.5, added by AB 1484, the Successor Agency prepared a Long-Range Property Management Plan (“LRPMP”) addressing the disposition and use of the real property owned by the Redevelopment Agency. The Redevelopment Agency had purchased property located near the southeast boarder of the City along the Southern Pacific Railway to create an industrial park to strengthen industrial opportunities and job expansion in the City (“Industrial Park”). The Gridley/Taxing Agency Compensation Agreement Page 2
LRPMP properties include Parcel A retained for government use, Parcel 1 designated for sale, Parcel 2A designated for sale, and Parcel 2B retained for future development. The LRPMP was approved by the Oversight Board on December 29, 2015 by Resolution No. 2015-OC-004 and duly submitted to the California Department of Finance (“DOF”) in accordance with Section 34191.5. A map of the LRPMP properties can be found in Exhibit A, Figure 1.

H. DOF, by letter dated December 31, 2015, approved the LRPMP, inclusive of the request to transfer the Agency Properties to the City for future development provided it reaches compensation agreements with all the affected taxing entities pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34180(f)(1).

I. The LRPMP stated a parcel map would be created, further subdividing the parcels. A map of the subdivided parcels can be found in Exhibit A, Figure 2. The parcels make up the Industrial Park.

J. LRPMP Parcel 2B (Industrial Park Parcels 6-9) was approved to be retained by the City for future development as a corporation yard, community park for organized sports, and transit facility. The LRPMP states, “no other properties within the City are available for purchase, nor is the city in a position to purchase due to budget shortfalls.” It further notes that Gridley is a Disadvantaged Community whose population is underserved with respect to park space.

K. Parcels retained by the City for future development require a compensation agreement to be executed with all affected taxing agencies who receive a share of property tax from the property pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34191.5(c)(2)(A)(iii).

L. The City seeks to rejuvenate the Industrial Park area and intend to develop Parcel 6 (APN 021-240-032) as a City-owned recreational sports complex and Parcels 7 (APN 021-270-047) and 9 (APN 021-270-049) as a City corporate yard (the “Agency Properties”) as described in the LRPMP.

M. The City has executed a Grant Deed and Deed Restriction dated March 12, 2024 transferring ownership to Parcel 6 to the City and restricting use as a sports complex to comply with grant funding from the California Department of Parks and Recreation.

Such documents are provided as Exhibit B.

N. According to the City, the development of the Agency Properties are proposed is critical to creation of the Industrial Park and carry out the intent of the LRPMP.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, which are incorporated herein by this reference, and the mutual promises in this Agreement, the parties agree as follows:

Gridley/Taxing Agency Compensation Agreement Page 3
Section 1. The [District] approves the retention of the Agency Properties by the City to develop the properties as a recreational sports complex and City corporate yard as intended by the LRPMP and the Deed Restriction provided in Exhibit B.

Section 2. If, for any reason, the City does not develop the Agency Properties with governmental uses and instead sell the Agency Properties to a third party at a price greater than $0 ("alternate disposition price"), the City hereby agrees that the [District] shall receive its pro rata share of net proceeds, if any, resulting from the sale of the Agency Property at the approved alternate disposition price in accordance with applicable provisions of the Dissolution Law. Exhibit C lists the District’s pro rata share, together with the pro rata shares of all affected taxing entities for the sale of property within the boundaries of the Gridley Redevelopment Project Area, as provided by the Auditor-Controller of the County of Butte (“Auditor-Controller”).

Section 3. The Parties acknowledge and agree that they are entering into this Agreement to satisfy the requirement presented by DOF to the effect that the City enters into a compensation agreement with each of the affected taxing entities.

Section 4.
a. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same Agreement.
b. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with, the internal laws of the State of California, without regard to conflict of law principles.
c. No Assignments. This Agreement may not be assigned by any of the parties hereto.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Compensation Agreement between the City and the [District] is effective as of the day and year first above written.

CITY
By: __________________________
Title: _________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: __________________________
Title: _________________________
Gridley/Taxing Agency Compensation Agreement Page 4
[DISTRICT]
By: __________________________ ATTEST
Title: _________________________ By: ___________________________ Clerk of Said Board
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: __________________________
Title: _________________________
Gridley/Taxing Agency Compensation Agreement Page 5

EXHIBIT A

LONG RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN AND GRIDLEY INDUSTRIAL PARK MAPS Figure 1: LRPMP Lot Map Figure 2: Industrial Park Recorded Map with LRPMP Overlay Gridley/Taxing Agency Compensation Agreement Page 6

EXHIBIT B
Grant Deed and Deed Restriction for Parcel 6 Commented [A1]: Insert Gridley/Taxing Agency Compensation Agreement Page 7

EXHIBIT C
Taxing Agency Shares

← All documents from this meeting