AGENDA
GROVER BEACH CITY COUNCIL
GROVER BEACH CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBER
154 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET
GROVER BEACH, CALIFORNIA
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 2024, 6:00 PM
Next Resolution No .24-07
Next Ordinance No. 24-01
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office (805-473-4567) at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to ensure that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting.
CALL TO ORDER
CALL TO ORDER
FLAG SALUTE
ROLL CALL Council Members Daniel Rushing, Clint Weirick, Zach Zimmerman, Mayor Pro Tem Robert Robert, and Mayor Karen Bright
CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS
At 8:10 p.m., the Council met in Closed Session regarding the following item(s):
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 Closed Session Announcements: At 9:05 p.m., Mayor Bright reconvened the meeting in open session with all Council Members present, and announced there were no reportable actions taken during Closed Session.
AGENDA REVIEW
At this time the City Council will review the order of business to be conducted and receive requests for, or make announcements regarding, any change(s) in the order of the day. The Council should by motion adopt the agenda as presented or as revised.
CEREMONIAL CALENDAR
1. Proclamation for Administrative Services Director Deanne Purcell
PRESENTATIONS
None
Meetings can be viewed on Channel 20 and are live streamed on the City’s website via www.slospan.org. Members of the public who cannot attend the meeting in person may provide public comment during the meeting by calling (805) 321-6639 to provide public comment via phone (the phone line will open just prior to the start of the meeting at 6:00 PM) or written public comments can be submitted via email to [email protected] prior to the Council meeting. If submitting written comments in advance of the meeting, please note the agenda item.
Agenda: Grover Beach City Council Meeting Page 2
Tuesday, February 13, 2024
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
During this time, the Council will allow up to 15 minutes for Public Communication with additional communication, if necessary, allowed after the Regular Business Items. Any member of the public may address the Council for a period not to exceed three minutes total on any item of interest within the jurisdiction of this Council. The Council will listen to all communications; however, in compliance with the Brown Act, the Council cannot act on items not on the agenda.
CONSENT AGENDA
The following routine items listed below are scheduled for consideration as a group. Recommendations for each item are noted in parentheses. Members of the audience may speak on any item(s) listed on the Consent Agenda. Any Council Member, the City Attorney, or the City Manager may request that an item be withdrawn from the Consent Agenda to allow for full discussion. Items withdrawn from the Consent Agenda will be heard after the rest of the Consent Agenda is approved.
2. Minutes of the City Council Meeting on Monday, January 22, 2024 – City Clerk Sims (Recommended Action: Approve the minutes as submitted or revised.)
VOICE VOTE
3. Approval of Updated 2024 Legislative Platform – Assistant City Manager Eriksson (Recommended Action: Approve the 2024 City of Grover Beach Legislative Platform, as amended based on Council direction.)
VOICE VOTE
4. Introduction and First Reading to Amend Municipal Code Article IX to Adopt Revisions to the City’s Short-Term Rental Ordinance and Approve a Local Coastal Program Amendment – Community Development Director Martin (Recommended Action: 1) Conduct first reading, by title only, and introduce amendments to the City’s Short-Term Rental Ordinance amending Grover Beach Municipal Code, Article IX; and 2) Schedule second reading and adoption of the Ordinance and Resolution approving a Local Coastal Program Amendment at the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting.)
VOICE VOTE
PUBLIC HEARING
5. Potential Programs/Projects for Inclusion in the 2023 State Community Development Block Grant (CDGB) Application – Community Development Director Martin and Associate Planner Reese
(Recommended Action: Adopt a Resolution to authorize staff to prepare and submit an application for a Community Development Block Grant to fund Phases 1 and 2 of the Ramona Garden Park Rehabilitation Project (CIP 1259).)
ROLL CALL VOTE
6. Resolution Establishing Ramona Garden Park Rule 20A Utility Underground District – Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Kahn and Senior Engineer Munoz-Morris (Recommended Action: Adopt a Resolution establishing the Ramona Garden Park Utility Undergrounding District and authorize staff to work with Pacific Gas and Electric to pursue a Rule 20A utility undergrounding project at Ramona Garden Park.)
ROLL CALL VOTE
Agenda: Grover Beach City Council Meeting Page 3
Tuesday, February 13, 2024
7. Second Reading and Adoption of an Ordinance Repealing and Replacing Chapter 1 (Sanitary Sewer System) of Article VII (Public Works) of the Grover Beach Municipal Code – Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Kahn and Senior Engineer MunozMorris (Recommended Action: Conduct a public hearing and second reading, by title only, and adopt an Ordinance repealing and replacing Chapter 1 (Sanitary Sewer System) of Article VII (Public Works) of the Grover Beach Municipal Code to update the City’s Sewer Ordinance.)
ROLL CALL VOTE
REGULAR BUSINESS
8. FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review and General Fund Financial Forecast– Administrative Services Director Szamet
(Recommended Action: Receive FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review including the updated General Fund Financial Forecast; approve mid-year budget augmentations; and provide input and direction to staff.)
9. Declaration of the Existence of a Local Emergency in the City of Grover Beach – City Manager/Emergency Services Director Bronson
(Recommended Action: Ratify the Declaration of the Existence of a Local Emergency in the City of Grover Beach as enacted on February 8, 2024 by the City Manager/Emergency Services Director.)
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Any member of the public may address the Council for a period not to exceed three minutes total on any item of interest within the jurisdiction of this Council. The Council will listen to all communications; however, in compliance with the Brown Act, the Council cannot act on items not on the agenda.
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
This item gives the Mayor and Council Members the opportunity to present reports to the other members regarding committees, commissions, boards, or special projects on which they may be participating.
Air Pollution Control District (APCD) Karen Bright (Alt: Robert Robert) Central Coast Blue Regional Recycled Water Authority Karen Bright (Alt: Daniel Rushing) (CCBRRWA)
South SLO County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD) Karen Bright (Alt: Clint Weirick) Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA) Robert Robert (Alt: Daniel Rushing) Five Cities Fire Joint Powers Authority Daniel Rushing (Alt: Clint Weirick) SLO Council of Governments / SLO Regional Transit Authority Daniel Rushing (Alt: Karen Bright) (SLOCOG / SLORTA)
South County Transit Committee Daniel Rushing (Alt: Karen Bright) Zone Three Advisory Committee Daniel Rushing (Alt: Karen Bright) California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA) Clint Weirick (Alt: Zach Zimmerman) Homeless Services Oversight Council (HSOC) Clint Weirick (Alt: Zach Zimmerman) SLO County Water Resources Advisory Committee (WRAC) Clint Weirick (Alt: Robert Robert) REACH Zach Zimmerman (Alt: Robert Robert)
South County Chambers of Commerce Zach Zimmerman (Alt: Daniel Rushing) Visit SLO CAL Advisory Committee Zach Zimmerman (Alt: Robert Robert) Agenda: Grover Beach City Council Meeting Page 4
Tuesday, February 13, 2024
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
This item gives individual Council Members the opportunity to seek consensus for scheduling a specific item on a future agenda, authorizing staff time to provide background information and prepare a staff report for a future agenda, or to comment on Council business, City operations, projects or other items of community interest.
CITY MANAGER’S REPORTS AND COMMENTS
CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORTS AND COMMENTS
CLOSED SESSION
It is the intention of the City Council to meet in Closed Session concerning the following item:
A. Conference with Legal Counsel Regarding Anticipated Litigation.
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (d) of Government Code section 54956.9.
Two (2) Cases.
B. Conference with Labor Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6.
Agency designated representatives: Special Counsel Che Johnson, City Manager Matthew Bronson, Admin. Services Director Nick Szamet, Finance Manger Lorena Zarate, and Human Resource Officer Karla Mattocks.
Employee Organizations: Service Employees International Union, Local 620 (SEIU), Management and Confidential Group, Executive Management Group, and Grover Beach Police Management and Confidential Employees Group.
ADJOURNMENT
* * * * *
Per Resolution No. 17-21, the public portion of City Council meetings will be scheduled to start at 6:00 p.m. and conclude no later than 11:00 p.m. Any open session items remaining on the agenda at 11:00 p.m. that have not been discussed or considered by the City Council will be continued to an adjourned meeting of the City Council (scheduled before the next regular meeting). However, the City Council may choose to continue the meeting past 11:00 p.m. upon a proper motion and a 4/5ths vote in favor of such an action. * * * * *
Staff reports or other written materials relating to each item of business referred to on this agenda are available from the City website www.groverbeach.org and on file in the City Clerk’s Office. A public counter copy is available for public inspection and reproduction during normal business hours at City Hall, 154 South 8th Street, Grover Beach, CA. Related materials submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available in the City Clerk's Office during normal business hours. If you have questions regarding any agenda item, please contact the appropriate City Department. Any writings or documents regarding any item on this agenda, not exempt from public disclosure, provided to a majority of the City Council and distributed subsequent to distribution of the agenda packet will be made available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office during normal business hours.
* * * * *
Note: This agenda was prepared and posted pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2. This agenda is subject to amendment up to 72 hours prior to the date and time set for the meeting. Please refer to the agenda posted at City Hall for any revisions or call the City Clerk’s Office at (805) 473-4567 for more information.
* * * * *
The agenda and staff reports are also available on the City’s website: www.groverbeach.org
CITY OF GROVER BEACH
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CONDUCT AND DECORUM AT COUNCIL MEETINGS (Pursuant to Resolution No. 07-44, adopted 04-16-07, revised 02-18-2020) The City Council and staff welcomes and encourages civic participation and debate on issues. The Council values the public’s opinion and in every Council meeting invite and encourages the public to address the Council on any matter of interest. The Council adopted these policies and procedures for appropriate conduct and decorum at Council meetings and establish guidance for public participation during Council meetings.
These policies will foster and provide greater clarity to preserve the intent of open government and maintain a positive environment for public input and City Council decision-making.
1.0 DECORUM AND ORDER – IN GENERAL
1.1 The presiding officer is responsible for the maintenance of order and decorum at all times.
1.2 The presiding officer shall determine all points of order subject to the right of any Council member to appeal to the City Council by majority vote. If any appeal is taken, the question shall be “Shall the decision of the presiding officer be sustained” in which event a majority vote of the Council shall govern and conclusively determine such question of order.
1.3 All Council members, staff members and members of the public should speak respectfully and avoid the use of profanity, vulgarity and slanderous comments. Recognizing that the First Amendment precludes the City Council form prohibiting speakers from speaking based upon the content of their speech, the presiding officer shall use their best efforts, short of enforcement action, to remind and encourage all participating in the meeting to keep their speech respectful towards others and within bounds appropriate for children and persons of sensitivity toward course language as a courtesy to others present or otherwise viewing Council meetings.
2.0 DECORUM AND ORDER – COUNCIL MEMBERS
2.1 Manner of Speaking.
Any Council member desiring to speak shall first address the presiding officer. Upon recognition by the presiding officer, the Council member shall speak only to the question under debate.
U2.1(a) Questioning Staff.
A Council member desiring to question the staff should address his question to the City Manager, or, in appropriate cases, the City Clerk or City Attorney, who shall be entitled either to answer the inquiry or to designate some staff member for that purpose. Such a designation may be made at the time of any staff presentation or on the agenda listing for the item.
U2.1(b) Interruptions.
Once recognized, a Council member shall not be interrupted while speaking unless called to order by the presiding officer; unless a point of order is raised by another Council member, or unless the speaker chooses to yield to questions from another Council member.
3.0 DECORUM AND ORDER – STAFF
3.1 City Manager Responsibilities
The City Manager is responsible for ensuring that members of the administrative staff observe the rules of decorum and order set forth in this Policy.
3.2 AAddressing the City Council
Any administrative staff member desiring to address the City Council or members of the public shall first be recognized by the presiding officer. All remarks shall be addressed to the presiding officer and not to any individual Council Member or member of the public. Administrative staff members shall accord the utmost courtesy to the City Council, other administrative staff members and the public.
4.0 DECORUM AND ORDER – MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC
4.1 AAddressing the City Council
Any member of the public desiring to address the City Council or members of the public shall first be recognized by the presiding officer at the appropriate place on the agenda. All remarks shall be addressed to the presiding officer and not to any individual Council Member, City Manager, City Attorney or member of the administrative staff or member of the public.
4.2 Time Limitation for Addressing the City Council
Public comment when addressing the City Council shall be generally limited to three (3) minutes per speaker. Depending on the extent of the agenda and the number of persons desiring to speak on an issue, the presiding officer may, at the beginning of the hearing, set a different time limit for each speaker. Any person may speak for a longer period of time upon approval from the presiding officer, when deemed necessary, for instance when a person is speaking on behalf of a group or has a graphic or slide presentation requiring more time.
4.3 Failure to Yield, Disruptions
Any person who refuses to relinquish the floor after their allotted time or while attending the City Council meeting engages in conduct or speech which disrupts the business of the meeting shall be brought to order and/or removed from the room if the sergeant-at-arms is so directed by the presiding officer.
Disruptive remarks from the audience, stamping of feet, clapping, whistles, yells and similar demonstrations shall not be permitted by the presiding officer who may direct the sergeant-at-arms to remove such offenders from the room.
4.4 Prosecution
Aggravated cases shall be prosecuted on appropriate complaint signed by the presiding officer.
5.0 ENFORCEMENT OF DECORUM
5.1 The Chief of Police or his designee shall be the ex-officio sergeant-at-arms of the City Council. The sergeant-at-arms shall carry out all legal and valid orders and instructions given by the presiding officer for the purpose of maintaining order and decorum in the Council Chamber. Upon instructions from the presiding officer, it shall be the duty of the sergeant-at-arms to remove any disorderly person from the Council Chambers or place the disorderly person under arrest or both.
5.2 As set forth in Government Code Section 54957.9, in the event that any meeting is willfully interrupted by a person or group of persons so as to render the orderly conduct of such meeting unfeasible or impedes the ability of the Council to hold the meeting, and order cannot be restored by the removal of individuals who are willfully interrupting the meeting, the presiding officer may order the meeting room cleared and continue in session. Only matters appearing on the agenda may be considered in such a session. Duly accredited representatives of the press or other news media, except those participating in the disturbance, shall be allowed to attend any session held pursuant to this Section. Nothing in this Section shall prohibit the City Council from establishing a procedure for readmitting an individual or individuals not responsible for willfully disturbing the orderly conduct of the meeting.
Agenda Item No. 1
Proclamation for Administrative Services
Director Deanne Purcell
(CC Mtg 2/13/2024)
No Documentation for this Agenda Item –
Proclamation for Administrative Services Director Deanne Purcell
MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MONDAY, JANUARY 22, 2024
CALL TO ORDER Mayor Bright called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chamber, 154 South Eighth Street, Grover Beach, California.
FLAG SALUTE The flag salute was led by AJ. Olivo, an 11-year-old, 6th grader at Fairgrove Elementary School.
ROLL CALL
City Council: Council Members Daniel Rushing, Clint Weirick, Mayor Pro Tem Robert Robert, and Mayor Karen Bright were present. Zach Zimmerman was absent.
City Staff: City Manager Matthew Bronson, City Attorney David Hale, Assistant City Manager Kristin Eriksson, Police Chief John Peters, Administrative Services Director Nick Szamet, Community Development Director Megan Martin, Finance Manager Lorena Zarate and Deputy City Clerk Nicole Retana were also present.
CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS
None.
AGENDA REVIEW
Action: Upon unanimous consensus, the Council adopted the agenda as presented.
CEREMONIAL CALENDAR
1. Proclamation for City Attorney Hale was read by Mayor Bright.
2. Proclamation for Fire Chief Stephen Lieberman was read by Council Member Rushing.
PRESENTATIONS
3. 2023 City Employees of the Year by City Manager Bronson
4. 2023 Police Department Employees of the Year by Police Chief Peters.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS The Mayor opened the floor to any member of the public for comment on items of interest which were within the jurisdiction of the City Council, but were not listed on the agenda.
• Anita Shower
• Lynn Austin
Agenda Item No. 2
Minutes: City Council Meeting Page 2
Monday, January 22, 2024
• Brenda Auer
• Elizabeth Doukas
• Ken Lehmann
• Cathryn Sells
• Debbie Peterson
• Cathryn Sells
• Pamela Storton
CONSENT AGENDA
Prior to consideration of the Consent Agenda, Mayor Bright opened public comment. • Brenda Auer
There being no further public comments received, the Mayor closed public comment.
It was motioned by Council Member Weirick and seconded by Council Member Rushing to approve Consent Agenda Item Nos. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 as recommended. The motion carried on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members – Rushing, Weirick, Mayor Pro Tem Robert and Mayor Bright
NOES: Council Members – None.
ABSENT: Council Members – Zimmerman
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
5. Treasurer’s Report for the Period December 1, through December 31, 2023 Action: Approved the Treasurer’s Report as submitted.
6. Treasurer’s Report for the 2022 Street Bond Account - $10,000,000 for the Period December 1, through December 31, 2023
Action: Approved the Treasurer’s Report as submitted.
7. Minutes of the City Council Meeting on Monday, January 8, 2024 Action: Approved the minutes as submitted.
8. FY 2022-23 Citizens Oversight Committee Report for the City Revenue Measures including K-14 Street Repair Bond, X-06 Transaction and Use Tax, and Measure F20 Transaction and Use Tax Action: Received and filed the FY 2022-23 Citizens Oversight Committee Report for City Revenue Measures.
9. FY 2022-2023 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report
Action: Received and filed the FY 2022-23 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report.
Minutes: City Council Meeting Page 3
Monday, January 22, 2024
10. Annual Military Equipment Report per CA Assembly Bill No. 481 Action: Received and filed the annual Military Equipment Report per CA Assembly Bill No. 481 and Adopted Resolution No. 24-05 Authorizing the Continuation of Ordinance #22-01 and the Purchase of Additional Unmanned Aerial Systems (Drones) and Patrol Rifles in 2024.
Resolution No. 24-05: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grover Beach, California, Receiving the 2023 Annual Military Equipment Use Report, Authorizing the Purchase of New and Replacement Unmanned Aerial Systems, Patrol Rifles, and 40MM Launchers and Updating the Police Department’s Military Equipment Use Policy as Required by AB 481.
11. Resolution to Establish the Job Classification of Community Services Coordinator and Remove Job Classification of Recreation Coordinator and Public Works Maintenance Specialist
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 24-06 to establish the job classification of Community Services Coordinator and removed classifications of Recreation Coordinator and Maintenance Specialist.
Resolution No. 24-06: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Grover Beach, California, Adding the Job Classification of Community Services Coordinator, Removing the Job Classifications of Recreation Coordinator and Maintenance Specialist.
12. Development Application 22-24 – Approval of Final Subdivision Map, Covenant Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R’s) and Subdivision Improvement Agreement Action: Approved the Final Condominium Subdivision Map for Development Application 22-24 (402 West Grand Avenue), CC&R’s, Subdivision Improvement Agreement, and authorized the City Clerk to sign and record the map and direct the City Manager to enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the Applicant (GB Towers, LLC).)
PUBLIC HEARING
Note: The Second Reading and Public Hearing for the Ordinance Repealing and Replacing of Chapter 1 (Sanitary Sewer System) of Article VII (Public Works) of the GBMC has been moved to the February 13th Council Meeting.
REGULAR BUSINESS
13. 2023 Community Survey Results
Mayor Bright read the title to the foregoing item and deferred to staff for a report.
Assistant City Manager Eriksson introduced Adam Probolsky who presented the Community Survey results.
Minutes: City Council Meeting Page 4
Monday, January 22, 2024
Mayor Bright invited public comment on this matter. No public comments were received at this time and the Mayor closed public comment.
Action: Council received the results of the 2023 Community Survey of Grover Beach Residents and provided input to staff.
14. State Legislative Update and Review of City Legislation Platform Mayor Bright read the title to the foregoing item and deferred to staff for a report.
Assistant City Manager Eriksson presented a PowerPoint Presentation on the State Legislation Update and review of City Legislation Platform.
Mayor Bright invited public comment on this matter. No public comments were received at this time and the Mayor closed public comment.
Action: Council received the results of the 2023 Community Survey of Grover Beach Residents and provided input to staff.
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
Council Member Rushing discussed the SLO Council of Governments/SLO Regional Transit Authority meeting (SLOCOG / SLORTA)
Council Member Robert discussed his attendance at the Integrated Waste Management Authority (IWMA) meeting and went to the monthly Mayor’s meeting in place of Mayor Bright.
Council Member Weirick reported on Homeless Services Oversight Council (HSOC).
Mayor Bright reported on the South SLO County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD).
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
A. Council Member Weirick reported on attending the Community Services Annual Volunteer Appreciation Dinner last Friday and attending the Cal Cities virtual meeting on January 18th.
B. Mayor Bright apologized for not attending the Volunteer dinner and thanked all our Volunteers.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS AND COMMENTS
City Manager Bronson mentioned the REACH seminar that he and Council Member Zimmerman attended. Also the groundbreaking on Thursday, February 25th for 402 West Grand Avenue mixed-use building put on by Coastal Community Builders. He also commented on the Five Cities Repair Café event has been pushed back to later on in the year.
Minutes: City Council Meeting Page 5
Monday, January 22, 2024
CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORTS AND COMMENTS
City Attorney Hale once again thanked all City Council members and City Staff.
CLOSED SESSION
At 8:10 p.m., the Council met in Closed Session regarding the following item(s):
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 Closed Session Announcements: At 9:05 p.m., Mayor Bright reconvened the meeting in open session with all Council Members present, and announced there were no reportable actions taken during Closed Session.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the City Council, Mayor Bright adjourned the meeting at 9:06 p.m.
_____________________________
KAREN BRIGHT, MAYOR
Attest:
______________________________
WENDI SIMS, CITY CLERK
(Approved at CC Mtg ______)
Agenda Item No. 3
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council DATE: February 13, 2024 FROM: Matthew Bronson, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Kristin Eriksson, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of Updated 2024 Legislative Platform
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the 2024 City of Grover Beach Legislative Platform, as amended based on Council direction.
BACKGROUND:
At the January 22, 2024 City Council meeting, the Council considered re-approval of the previously adopted 2023 Legislative Platform without changes for 2024 (see Attachment 1).
The platform is organized in the following topic-based categories:
• General Government – Generally supports local control to address local needs and opposes State preemption of local authority and unfunded or underfunded mandates; • Local Government Finance – Generally supports legislation protecting or enhancing City revenues and opposes unfunded mandates, restrictions on revenues and restrictions on contracting for cities;
• Public Safety – Generally supports funding and support for emergency response and crime reduction programs;
• Transportation and Public Works – Generally supports funding and expedited processes capital and infrastructure projects, supports funding for key water supply projects, and funding for implementation of organic waste disposal requirements; • Resources and Environment – Generally supports funding and programs related to energy and water supply projects along with organic waste disposal • Community Development – Generally supports funding and programs to address homelessness, supports legislation to reform cannabis regulations and supports protection of transient occupancy tax revenue.
During deliberations, Council Member Weirick requested a modification to the platform and received concurrence from the Council to include support of legislation that would preserve awarded State or Federal grant funding. The amended 2024 Legislative Platform with tracked changes may be found in Attachment 2, with a final version attached as Attachment 3. Upon approval, the platform will be distributed to the City’s State and Federal officials representing the City, as well as the National League of Cities and the League of California Cities. The platform will also be available on the City’s website.
Staff Report: Approval of Amended 2023 Legislative Platform Page 2 February 13, 2024
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with these actions.
ALTERNATIVES
The Council has the following alternatives to consider:
1) Approve the 2024 City of Grover Beach Legislative Platform, as amended per Council direction; or
2) Provide alternative direction to staff.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
The agenda was posted in accordance with the Brown Act.
Attachments
1. 2023 City of Grover Beach Legislative Platform
2. Amended 2024 City of Grover Beach Legislative Platform (tracked changes)
3. Final 2024 City of Grover Beach Legislative Platform City of Grover Beach
2023 Legislative Platform
Approved by City Council March 27, 2023
Attachment 1
Contents
SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 1
1.1 General Purpose.......................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Authority ...................................................................................................................... 1
1.2.1 Adoption. .............................................................................................................. 1
1.2.2 City Manager Authority. ........................................................................................ 1
1.2.3 Limit to City Manager Authority. ............................................................................ 1
1.3 Distribution................................................................................................................... 1 SECTION 2 – GENERAL GOVERNMENT................................................................................. 1
2.1 Local Control................................................................................................................ 1 SECTION 3 – LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE...................................................................... 2 SECTION 4 – PUBLIC Safety .................................................................................................... 2
4.1 Emergency Response.................................................................................................. 2
4.2 Crime Reduction .......................................................................................................... 2
4.3 Victim’s Rights ............................................................................................................. 2 SECTION 5 – TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS....................................................... 3
5.1 General Infrastructure.................................................................................................. 3 SECTION 6 – RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT .................................................................. 3
6.1 Water Resiliency.......................................................................................................... 3
6.2 Organic Waste Disposal............................................................................................... 3 SECTION 7 – COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT........................................................................... 3
7.1 Housing and Homelessness ........................................................................................ 3
7.2 Commercial Cannabis.................................................................................................. 4
7.3 Travel and Tourism...................................................................................................... 4 1 SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION
1.1 General Purpose
The City of Grover Beach Legislative Platform (Platform) is adopted to formalize Council priorities and allow for expedient promotion of the City’s interests in legislative matters.
The Platform is designed to guide the Council and staff in taking appropriate action on legislative proposals and actions in the State and Federal governments.
1.2 Authority
1.2.1 Adoption - The Platform is developed with input from all City departments and is adopted by the City Council annually.
1.2.2 City Manager Authority – The City Manager or designee may take actions to support or oppose proposed legislation without prior approval of the City Council when consistent with the platform, provided that the City Council may set or change the City’s established position on any specific legislation even it inconsistent with this Platform’s general position.
1.2.3 Limit to City Manager Authority – The City Council will maintain sole authority to establish an initial position for any proposed legislation that would result in the matter coming before voters as a statewide ballot measure, such as California constitutional amendments, a statewide bond measure, or a measure amending a previously-approved statewide ballot measure.
1.3 Distribution
Upon the Council’s annual approval, the Legislative Platform shall be distributed to California’s U.S. Senators, U.S. Congressmembers, as well as all California State Constitutional offices representing the City, all California State Senator(s) and Assemblymember(s) representing the City, the National League of Cities and the League of California Cities.
SECTION 2 – GENERAL GOVERNMENT
2.1 Local Control
• Support legislation that enhances local control for various permitting, land use, contracting and discretionary actions and allows cities to address the needs of local communities within a framework of regional cooperation
• Oppose legislation that preempts local authority and impedes the City’s ability to address community needs.
• Oppose legislation that imposes unfunded or insufficiently funded mandates by the State.
2 SECTION 3 – LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE
• Support legislation that protects, increases and/or modernizes revenue streams for local priorities.
• Support legislation to provide full and prompt reimbursement to all local agencies for all state-mandated programs and/or infractions and losses associated with local revenue shifts.
• Support legislation that creates streamlined and less competitive funding opportunities for cities with smaller budgets, geographical size and population, such as the City. • Support legislation that fully funds positions in State and Federal agencies that can accelerate the prompt administration of funding and reimbursements from those agencies to the City.
• Oppose legislation that mandates new duties, responsibilities or obligations to a City under state realignment.
• Oppose legislation that increases the threshold for voters to pass new or increased state or local taxes needed to fund local services and infrastructure. • Oppose legislation that eliminates or restricts control of or creates barriers to the City’s revenue sources.
• Oppose legislation that restricts the City’s ability to contract for goods or services or otherwise increases costs of contracting for goods or services.
SECTION 4 – PUBLIC SAFETY
4.1 Emergency Response
• Support legislation to provide funding for disaster prevention efforts, emergency response planning, and training and equipment for response and recovery efforts. • Support legislation to develop and implement statewide-integrated public safety communication systems.
4.2 Crime Reduction
• Support legislation to allow for greater crime reduction in the community. • Support legislation to add fentanyl to the list of illegal substances subject to the existing weight enhancements for criminal sentencing.
4.3 Victim’s Rights
• Support legislation increasing the rights of victims of crimes. 3 SECTION 5 – TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS
5.1 General Infrastructure
• Support legislation providing funding for revolving loan fund programs to assist with financing capital costs of infrastructure improvements, including facility replacements. • Support legislation to expedite project delivery processes and expand project delivery methods for use by all cities for facilities and infrastructure. • Support legislation that secures state and federal fees and taxes originally programmed for roadway repairs, highway congestion management and transportation improvement projects.
• Oppose legislation that slows, impairs or eliminates funding for public infrastructure.
SECTION 6 – RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT
6.1 Water Resiliency
• Support legislation and administrative actions that provide funding or grant programs for energy and water efficiency improvements.
• Support legislation that provides funding for key water supply and infrastructure grant and loan programs.
6.2 Organic Waste Disposal
• Support legislation that provides additional funding or other assistance to implement organic waste disposal requirements.
• Support legislation providing funding for smaller cities to pursue carbon neutral solutions.
SECTION 7 – COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
7.1 Housing and Homelessness
• Support legislation to streamline all types of housing development while protecting the City’s permitting, fees and regulatory processes.
• Support legislation to providing funding mechanisms for infrastructure needed for housing development.
• Support legislation providing funding for homeless services and shelter projects and operations.
• Support legislation to allow the City more flexibility in creating shelters and temporary and permanent housing.
• Support legislation to provide funding for cleanup efforts as a result of homeless encampments.
4 7.2 Commercial Cannabis
• Support legislation that provides for reforms of regulatory barriers to the legal cannabis industry
• Support legislation that allows for the sale of food and non-alcoholic drinks at cannabis retailers that permit onsite consumption of cannabis products.
7.3 Travel and Tourism
• Oppose legislation that would reduce or eliminate online travel agencies or platforms from collecting and remitting Transient Occupancy Tax to local jurisdictions.
City of Grover Beach
2023 2024 Legislative Platform
Approved by City Council March 27, 2023February 13, 2024 Attachment 2
Contents
SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 1
1.1 General Purpose.......................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Authority ...................................................................................................................... 1
1.2.1 Adoption. .............................................................................................................. 1
1.2.2 City Manager Authority. ........................................................................................ 1
1.2.3 Limit to City Manager Authority. ............................................................................ 1
1.3 Distribution................................................................................................................... 1 SECTION 2 – GENERAL GOVERNMENT................................................................................. 1
2.1 Local Control................................................................................................................ 1 SECTION 3 – LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE...................................................................... 2 SECTION 4 – PUBLIC Safety .................................................................................................... 2
4.1 Emergency Response.................................................................................................. 2
4.2 Crime Reduction .......................................................................................................... 2
4.3 Victim’s Rights ............................................................................................................. 2 SECTION 5 – TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS....................................................... 3
5.1 General Infrastructure.................................................................................................. 3 SECTION 6 – RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT .................................................................. 3
6.1 Water Resiliency.......................................................................................................... 3
6.2 Organic Waste Disposal............................................................................................... 3 SECTION 7 – COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT........................................................................... 3
7.1 Housing and Homelessness ........................................................................................ 3
7.2 Commercial Cannabis.................................................................................................. 4
7.3 Travel and Tourism...................................................................................................... 4 1 SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION
1.1 General Purpose
The City of Grover Beach Legislative Platform (Platform) is adopted to formalize Council priorities and allow for expedient promotion of the City’s interests in legislative matters.
The Platform is designed to guide the Council and staff in taking appropriate action on legislative proposals and actions in the State and Federal governments.
1.2 Authority
1.2.1 Adoption - The Platform is developed with input from all City departments and is adopted by the City Council annually.
1.2.2 City Manager Authority – The City Manager or designee may take actions to support or oppose proposed legislation without prior approval of the City Council when consistent with the platform, provided that the City Council may set or change the City’s established position on any specific legislation even it inconsistent with this Platform’s general position.
1.2.3 Limit to City Manager Authority – The City Council will maintain sole authority to establish an initial position for any proposed legislation that would result in the matter coming before voters as a statewide ballot measure, such as California constitutional amendments, a statewide bond measure, or a measure amending a previously-approved statewide ballot measure.
1.3 Distribution
Upon the Council’s annual approval, the Legislative Platform shall be distributed to California’s U.S. Senators, U.S. Congressmembers, as well as all California State Constitutional offices representing the City, all California State Senator(s) and Assemblymember(s) representing the City, the National League of Cities and the League of California Cities.
SECTION 2 – GENERAL GOVERNMENT
2.1 Local Control
• Support legislation that enhances local control for various permitting, land use, contracting and discretionary actions and allows cities to address the needs of local communities within a framework of regional cooperation
• Oppose legislation that preempts local authority and impedes the City’s ability to address community needs.
• Oppose legislation that imposes unfunded or insufficiently funded mandates by the State.
2 SECTION 3 – LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE
• Support legislation that protects, increases and/or modernizes revenue streams for local priorities.
• Support legislation to provide full and prompt reimbursement to all local agencies for all state-mandated programs and/or infractions and losses associated with local revenue shifts.
• Support legislation that creates streamlined and less competitive funding opportunities for cities with smaller budgets, geographical size and population, such as the City. • Support legislation that fully funds positions in State and Federal agencies that can accelerate the prompt administration of funding and reimbursements from those agencies to the City.
• Support legislation that sustains funding for grants awarded by the State or Federal government.
• Oppose legislation that mandates new duties, responsibilities or obligations to a City under state realignment.
• Oppose legislation that increases the threshold for voters to pass new or increased state or local taxes needed to fund local services and infrastructure. • Oppose legislation that eliminates or restricts control of or creates barriers to the City’s revenue sources.
• Oppose legislation that restricts the City’s ability to contract for goods or services or otherwise increases costs of contracting for goods or services.
SECTION 4 – PUBLIC SAFETY
4.1 Emergency Response
• Support legislation to provide funding for disaster prevention efforts, emergency response planning, and training and equipment for response and recovery efforts. • Support legislation to develop and implement statewide-integrated public safety communication systems.
4.2 Crime Reduction
• Support legislation to allow for greater crime reduction in the community. • Support legislation to add fentanyl to the list of illegal substances subject to the existing weight enhancements for criminal sentencing.
4.3 Victim’s Rights
• Support legislation increasing the rights of victims of crimes. 3 SECTION 5 – TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS
5.1 General Infrastructure
• Support legislation providing funding for revolving loan fund programs to assist with financing capital costs of infrastructure improvements, including facility replacements. • Support legislation to expedite project delivery processes and expand project delivery methods for use by all cities for facilities and infrastructure. • Support legislation that secures state and federal fees and taxes originally programmed for roadway repairs, highway congestion management and transportation improvement projects.
• Oppose legislation that slows, impairs or eliminates funding for public infrastructure.
SECTION 6 – RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT
6.1 Water Resiliency
• Support legislation and administrative actions that provide funding or grant programs for energy and water efficiency improvements.
• Support legislation that provides funding for key water supply and infrastructure grant and loan programs.
6.2 Organic Waste Disposal
• Support legislation that provides additional funding or other assistance to implement organic waste disposal requirements.
• Support legislation providing funding for smaller cities to pursue carbon neutral solutions.
SECTION 7 – COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
7.1 Housing and Homelessness
• Support legislation to streamline all types of housing development while protecting the City’s permitting, fees and regulatory processes.
• Support legislation to providing funding mechanisms for infrastructure needed for housing development.
• Support legislation providing funding for homeless services and shelter projects and operations.
• Support legislation to allow the City more flexibility in creating shelters and temporary and permanent housing.
4 • Support legislation to provide funding for cleanup efforts as a result of homeless encampments.
7.2 Commercial Cannabis
• Support legislation that provides for reforms of regulatory barriers to the legal cannabis industry
• Support legislation that allows for the sale of food and non-alcoholic drinks at cannabis retailers that permit onsite consumption of cannabis products.
7.3 Travel and Tourism
• Oppose legislation that would reduce or eliminate online travel agencies or platforms from collecting and remitting Transient Occupancy Tax to local jurisdictions.
City of Grover Beach
2024 Legislative Platform
Approved by City Council February 13, 2024
Attachment 3
Contents
SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 1
1.1 General Purpose.......................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Authority ...................................................................................................................... 1
1.2.1 Adoption. .............................................................................................................. 1
1.2.2 City Manager Authority. ........................................................................................ 1
1.2.3 Limit to City Manager Authority. ............................................................................ 1
1.3 Distribution................................................................................................................... 1 SECTION 2 – GENERAL GOVERNMENT................................................................................. 1
2.1 Local Control................................................................................................................ 1 SECTION 3 – LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE...................................................................... 2 SECTION 4 – PUBLIC Safety .................................................................................................... 2
4.1 Emergency Response.................................................................................................. 2
4.2 Crime Reduction .......................................................................................................... 2
4.3 Victim’s Rights ............................................................................................................. 2 SECTION 5 – TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS....................................................... 3
5.1 General Infrastructure.................................................................................................. 3 SECTION 6 – RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT .................................................................. 3
6.1 Water Resiliency.......................................................................................................... 3
6.2 Organic Waste Disposal............................................................................................... 3 SECTION 7 – COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT........................................................................... 3
7.1 Housing and Homelessness ........................................................................................ 3
7.2 Commercial Cannabis.................................................................................................. 4
7.3 Travel and Tourism...................................................................................................... 4 1 SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION
1.1 General Purpose
The City of Grover Beach Legislative Platform (Platform) is adopted to formalize Council priorities and allow for expedient promotion of the City’s interests in legislative matters.
The Platform is designed to guide the Council and staff in taking appropriate action on legislative proposals and actions in the State and Federal governments.
1.2 Authority
1.2.1 Adoption - The Platform is developed with input from all City departments and is adopted by the City Council annually.
1.2.2 City Manager Authority – The City Manager or designee may take actions to support or oppose proposed legislation without prior approval of the City Council when consistent with the platform, provided that the City Council may set or change the City’s established position on any specific legislation even it inconsistent with this Platform’s general position.
1.2.3 Limit to City Manager Authority – The City Council will maintain sole authority to establish an initial position for any proposed legislation that would result in the matter coming before voters as a statewide ballot measure, such as California constitutional amendments, a statewide bond measure, or a measure amending a previously-approved statewide ballot measure.
1.3 Distribution
Upon the Council’s annual approval, the Legislative Platform shall be distributed to California’s U.S. Senators, U.S. Congressmembers, as well as all California State Constitutional offices representing the City, all California State Senator(s) and Assemblymember(s) representing the City, the National League of Cities and the League of California Cities.
SECTION 2 – GENERAL GOVERNMENT
2.1 Local Control
• Support legislation that enhances local control for various permitting, land use, contracting and discretionary actions and allows cities to address the needs of local communities within a framework of regional cooperation
• Oppose legislation that preempts local authority and impedes the City’s ability to address community needs.
• Oppose legislation that imposes unfunded or insufficiently funded mandates by the State.
2 SECTION 3 – LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE
• Support legislation that protects, increases and/or modernizes revenue streams for local priorities.
• Support legislation to provide full and prompt reimbursement to all local agencies for all state-mandated programs and/or infractions and losses associated with local revenue shifts.
• Support legislation that creates streamlined and less competitive funding opportunities for cities with smaller budgets, geographical size and population, such as the City. • Support legislation that fully funds positions in State and Federal agencies that can accelerate the prompt administration of funding and reimbursements from those agencies to the City.
• Support legislation that sustains funding for grants awarded by the State or Federal government.
• Oppose legislation that mandates new duties, responsibilities or obligations to a City under state realignment.
• Oppose legislation that increases the threshold for voters to pass new or increased state or local taxes needed to fund local services and infrastructure. • Oppose legislation that eliminates or restricts control of or creates barriers to the City’s revenue sources.
• Oppose legislation that restricts the City’s ability to contract for goods or services or otherwise increases costs of contracting for goods or services.
SECTION 4 – PUBLIC SAFETY
4.1 Emergency Response
• Support legislation to provide funding for disaster prevention efforts, emergency response planning, and training and equipment for response and recovery efforts. • Support legislation to develop and implement statewide-integrated public safety communication systems.
4.2 Crime Reduction
• Support legislation to allow for greater crime reduction in the community. • Support legislation to add fentanyl to the list of illegal substances subject to the existing weight enhancements for criminal sentencing.
4.3 Victim’s Rights
• Support legislation increasing the rights of victims of crimes. 3 SECTION 5 – TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS
5.1 General Infrastructure
• Support legislation providing funding for revolving loan fund programs to assist with financing capital costs of infrastructure improvements, including facility replacements. • Support legislation to expedite project delivery processes and expand project delivery methods for use by all cities for facilities and infrastructure. • Support legislation that secures state and federal fees and taxes originally programmed for roadway repairs, highway congestion management and transportation improvement projects.
• Oppose legislation that slows, impairs or eliminates funding for public infrastructure.
SECTION 6 – RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT
6.1 Water Resiliency
• Support legislation and administrative actions that provide funding or grant programs for energy and water efficiency improvements.
• Support legislation that provides funding for key water supply and infrastructure grant and loan programs.
6.2 Organic Waste Disposal
• Support legislation that provides additional funding or other assistance to implement organic waste disposal requirements.
• Support legislation providing funding for smaller cities to pursue carbon neutral solutions.
SECTION 7 – COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
7.1 Housing and Homelessness
• Support legislation to streamline all types of housing development while protecting the City’s permitting, fees and regulatory processes.
• Support legislation to providing funding mechanisms for infrastructure needed for housing development.
• Support legislation providing funding for homeless services and shelter projects and operations.
• Support legislation to allow the City more flexibility in creating shelters and temporary and permanent housing.
4 • Support legislation to provide funding for cleanup efforts as a result of homeless encampments.
7.2 Commercial Cannabis
• Support legislation that provides for reforms of regulatory barriers to the legal cannabis industry
• Support legislation that allows for the sale of food and non-alcoholic drinks at cannabis retailers that permit onsite consumption of cannabis products.
7.3 Travel and Tourism
• Oppose legislation that would reduce or eliminate online travel agencies or platforms from collecting and remitting Transient Occupancy Tax to local jurisdictions.
Agenda Item No.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council DATE: February 13, 2024 FROM: Megan Martin, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Introduction and First Reading to Amend Municipal Code Article IX to Adopt Revisions to the City’s Short-Term Rental Ordinance and Approve a Local Coastal Program Amendment
RECOMMENDATION
1) Conduct first reading, by title only, and introduce amendments to the City’s Short-term Rental Ordinance amending Grover Beach Municipal Code, Article IX; and 2) Schedule second reading and adoption of the Ordinance and a Resolution approving a Local Coastal Program Amendment at the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting.
BACKGROUND
On June 17, 2019, the City Council (Council) adopted a Short-term Rental (STR) ordinance (Ordinance No. 19-04) that permits owner-occupied and non-owner occupied STRs in the City1 .
Following adoption, staff developed “Administrative Rules” to inform applicants of the requirements to apply for and operate an STR. A “Good Neighbor Brochure” was also prepared by the City for operators to communicate to their visitors on how to be considerate and responsible neighbors. After implementation, City staff committed to regular reviews of the program to ensure its ongoing success and to identify deficiencies and areas for policy improvement or refinement.
On September 27, 2021, the Council received a presentation on the implementation of the STR Program. The Council provided policy direction at that time to modify the current Administrative Rules limiting multi-family development to one STR permit, establish a minimum stay requirement (12 nights per year) for non-owner occupied STRs, and create a waitlist for non-owner-occupied permits. On August 28, 2023, the Council received another presentation on the status and implementation of the STR regulatory program2
. Staff recommended areas in the ordinance for
refinement and the Council provided subsequent policy direction to consider changes in the City’s administration of its waitlist procedures, local contacts, STRs within Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), required annual minimum stays, and number of non-owner-occupied permits.
The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting on February 6, 2024, reviewed recommended changes to the STR Ordinance from staff, and, following public comment and Commission deliberation, recommended the Council adopt Ordinance No. 24-02 amending the City’s Shortterm Rental Ordinance (Ordinance No. 19-04) and approve a Local Coastal Program Amendment. 1 June 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report - https://www.grover.org/DocumentCenter/View/8652/Item-7_ShortTerm-Rentals?bidId= 2 August 28, 2023 City Council Staff Report - https://www.grover.org/DocumentCenter/View/14163/Item13_STRCouncil-Staff-Report-FINAL Staff Report: Introduction and First Reading of Short-term Rental Ordinance Amendments Page 2 February 13, 2024
Program Summary
As of February 7, 2024, the City has issued 113 STR permits which include 20 owner-occupied permits and the remaining non-owner occupied permits. There are two pending applications within the Coastal Zone and five pending applications outside the Coastal Zone. Of the permitted operators, 97% have listed their rentals on advertising platforms such as VRBO, Airbnb, and Booking while the remaining 3% utilize referrals to rent to select guests throughout the year.
The City has collected approximately $1.77 million in Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) revenue since the program’s inception in 2019. STR permit holders are also responsible for paying the City’s TOT (12%) and the San Luis Obispo County’s Tourism Management District (TDM) tax (1.5%) each quarter for an effective tax rate of 13.5%. In terms of revenue, STRs account for approximately 50% of the total TOT revenue collected by the City. Below is a table showing the TOT revenue generated annually:
Fiscal Year (FY) TOT Revenue % Increase
2019-20 $103,540.90 --
2020-21 $298,915.02 +189%
2021-22 $508,362.22 +70%
2022-23 $458,567.07 -10%
2024 to date $409,773.12 --
Taxes are remitted monthly by permittees via Host Compliance, the City’s third-party vendor for registration, monitoring, and tax remittance. Host Compliance also provides compliance and enforcement assistance. The City has one Code Compliance Officer who responds to all compliance issues associated with STRs, in addition to their other responsibilities. Since 2019, there have been a total of 75 compliance cases for permitted and unpermitted STRs (10 and 65, respectively). These cases range from noise, parking, and waste, to illegal STRs.
Council Directed Policy Changes
On August 28, 2023, the Council gave policy direction to staff related to the city’s administration of its waitlist procedures, local contacts, STRs within Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), required annual minimum stays, and increasing the number of non-owner-occupied permits. The Planning Commission reviewed those administrative changes on February 6, 2024, and unanimously recommended the Council adopt the changes as outlined below. A legislative draft of the changes to the STR regulations is available for reference online3 .
Section 4.10.185.H.4 – Local Contact Person. The STR Ordinance established a local contact requirement to ensure a person was available and able to be physically present at the STR within 30 minutes of receiving a complaint. City staff had received multiple complaints from interested parties and permittees regarding this requirement, arguing that it was burdensome, costprohibitive if it required hiring a property management company, and that it was arbitrary. As such, staff recommended the radius be expanded. The Council directed staff to expand to a 45-minute radius which effectively would allow a local contact to live within San Luis Obispo County and northern Santa Barbara County (San Miguel to Santa Maria city limits). This does not affect or change the Administrative Rule that a Local Contact must respond to a complaint within 30 minutes of receiving a complaint.
3 https://www.grover.org/DocumentCenter/View/14564/Draft-STR-Regulations-track-changes Staff Report: Introduction and First Reading of Short-term Rental Ordinance Amendments Page 3 February 13, 2024
Modification of the radial requirement to 45-minutes necessitated revisions to the “Local Contact” definition within Section 9.10.010 – Definitions of Specialized Terms and Phrases. The Administrative Rules have also been modified to reflect this change.
Section 4.10.185.H.14 – Minimum Stay Requirement. Council directed staff to consider increasing the minimum stay requirement for non-owner-occupied permits. The Commission, following a review of staff’s analysis, recommends no change to the minimum night requirement. Staff completed an analysis of the fiscal impact should the Council choose to revisit a potential increase to the minimum night requirement.
Staff analyzed increasing to 24- and 50-night minimums per fiscal year. In reviewing the nonowner occupied STRs for the last fiscal year (2021-22), only 15 STRs reported fewer than 25 stays per year, and 30 STRs reported fewer than 50 stays per year. Based on an estimated average TOT tax revenue of $41 per night, increasing the minimum night stay to 24 would yield approximately $6,000 in additional revenue under the program and eliminate 13% of non-owneroccupied permit holders. Increasing the minimum stays to 50 would yield approximately $28,800 in additional TOT revenue and eliminate 33% of non-owner-occupied permit holders.
While increasing the minimum stay requirement may result in more turnover in the waitlist, the additional stays may result in increased fiscal impacts for responding to complaints and costs associated with enforcement. Furthermore, increasing the minimum number of stays could be considered inconsistent with the intent of the SLO County Regional Compact Policy R-6:
“Encourage rental units be prioritized for long-term residents rather than short term users or vacation rentals”, which is further supported by the City’s Housing Element (Chapter 2 – Regional Visions for Housing).
Section 4.10.185.P – Effect of Ordinance on Existing Short-Term Rentals. The Commission agreed with staff recommendation to eliminate this language, entirely. This section requires unpermitted operators to apply for an STR permit within 60 days of the effected date of the ordinance. This language is no longer relevant as all operators have either complied or no longer operate as an STR.
New Section 4.10.185.P –Non-Compliant Short-Term Rentals. In concurrence with State law, the Commission recommended to allow the continued operation of any legally established STR that may become non-compliant with any proposed or future amendments to the STR ordinance.
However, it would also require the non-compliant STR to comply with any new requirements upon renewal of the STR permit. This section is also intended to address any STRs that were previously permitted within ADUs, JADUs, and residential development project(s) established under the HOME Act (see Section 4.10.185.Q, below). Any active permits for these types of dwellings would not be allowed to be renewed, in accordance with the relevant Government Code for each of these types of dwellings.
Section 4.10.185.Q – Effect of Ordinance on Existing or Proposed ADUs. This change would have a direct impact on permitted STRs within ADUs and is in response to State law (California Government Code §65852.2.e.4) which requires ADUs to be rented for at least 30 days. The City’s current ordinance states that any ADU that was existing, under construction, or in building plan review prior to September 11, 2020, could be used as an STR. However, State law supersedes this use and does not allow any ADUs to be used as STRs. To comply with this requirement, any renewal application received will be rejected and the ADU ineligible to further participate in the program.
Staff Report: Introduction and First Reading of Short-term Rental Ordinance Amendments Page 4 February 13, 2024
STRs and ADUs. As mentioned above, State law requires ADUs to be rented for at least 30 days, making ADUs ineligible for an STR permit. However, the Commission recommended staff clarify as part of the Administrative Rules that an STR can be permitted within the primary residence on a property when an ADU is already constructed, or if the primary residence is already permitted as an STR and the property owner constructs a new ADU.
Waitlist Procedures. Waitlist procedures for non-owner occupied permits were introduced by the City in response to the high demand for STR permits driven by regional growth and tourism. The aim was to distribute permits fairly among interested parties. 60 individuals are currently on the STR wait list with some having waited for over two years.
A review of the waitlist administration process revealed that some participants, upon the availability of permits, would repeatedly choose to “pass,” causing significant delays in issuance— some permits remained unissued for months. To address this, staff recommended modifying the Administrative Rules, establishing a more efficient issuance methodology, and preventing participants from taking advantage. The Council directed staff to revise the rules, limiting participants to a single “pass” to streamline the process. These changes are now reflected in the updated Administrative Rules outside of the ordinance presented to the Council.
Additional Changes Identified by Staff
Section 4.10.185.B.2 – Applicability. Minor revisions and clarifications were identified by staff to ensure the Ordinance is consistent with State law. These changes include additions to the prohibition of STRs within Single Room Occupancy Facilities (i.e. dormitories), Two-Unit Housing Development Projects, Urban Lot Splits, ADUs and JADUs. Also clarifies STR permits are limited to issuance of one permit per property or one per building when units share common walls.
Section 4.10.185.N.9 – Permit Revocation – Onsite Parking. Revisions to this section clarify that if a permitted STR is no longer able to meet minimum onsite parking requirements at the subject property, or if any changes to the property prevent ingress and/or egress, an STR Permit may be revoked.
The Planning Commission’s motion during the February 6th hearing included a recommendation to change the definition of the term ‘stay’ to be consistent to an ‘overnight accommodation’ rather than the length of the stay (see Attachment 3 – Glossary). This change was recommended to provide clarification to non-owner occupied STRs regarding the minimum stay requirement.
Proceeding the introduction of the changes to the STR Ordinance, staff will continue to work to improve upon the Rules and Regulations to provide greater clarification, internal consistency, and improve readability. Prior to the adoption of the changes to the STR Ordinance staff will present updated Administrative Rules and Regulations for Council consideration and input.
Survey
Staff prepared and distributed a survey to gauge community and STR permit holders’ opinions of the STR Program4
. Questions included basic demographics, impact of STRs on the neighborhood, overall satisfaction with the current STR regulations, and suggestions for change. As of February 6, 2024, the City had received 121 responses and the survey indicates that 75% of respondents are satisfied with the City’s STR Program and 86% find STRs to have a positive impact on neighborhoods. 2% percent of operators reported challenges in complying with the City’s regulations, whereas part of the same question, when asked to specify those challenges, 17% 4 https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/GBSTR2024
Staff Report: Introduction and First Reading of Short-term Rental Ordinance Amendments Page 5 February 13, 2024
responded with feedback, indicating more respondents provided feedback than reported challenges.
Respondents were also given the opportunity to provide suggestions for amending the current regulations. While 44% stated no adjustments were necessary, the following were some of the specific comments received:
• Reduce permitting fees and taxes.
• Improve registration, permitting, and tax remittance process. • Increase minimum night stay requirement.
• Allow more STRs in the community.
• Don’t allow more STRs in the community.
• STRs should be allowed in ADUs.
• STRs should be allowed in RVs.
• Eliminate cap on STRs in visitor-serving zones.
• Expand 30-minute timeframe to respond.
• Renewal every two years instead of annually.
• Stricter enforcement and prevent unpermitted STRs from operating. • Annual status updates to those on the waitlist.
The survey summary data is included with this report as Attachment 4. A complete set of detailed survey responses can be found on the City’s website: https://www.grover.org/345/Short-TermRentals.
Consulting Services
The City currently contracts with a third-party vendor, Host Compliance. Host Compliance provides rental monitoring, compliance, and enforcement assistance through an online permit portal. In response to the dynamic landscape of STRs in the State, other monitoring and compliance vendors have emerged, utilizing new technologies for data mining, expanded searches of rental platforms, and have made significant improvements to capturing real-time rental data. Since its adoption, the City has been dedicated to promoting accountability and the responsible use of STRs in the community. Staff will be seeking competitive proposals from qualified vendors to encourage innovation and build upon the success of the City’s STR program.
Coastal Commission & Local Coastal Program Amendment
Amendments to the STR Ordinance would result in changes to Chapters 4 and 9 of the Development Code (Article IX of the Municipal Code) that constitute the ordinances for implementation of the City’s Local Coastal Program (LCP). Therefore, this amendment requires an LCP Amendment in compliance with the California Coastal Act, which requires the California Coastal Commission’s approval prior to the ordinance taking effect in the coastal zone.
Staff provided the draft ordinance to Coastal Commission staff for preliminary review and comments. Coastal staff indicated the Coastal Commission would likely not support an increase to the number of STRs in the coastal zone due to impacts on local housing stock. While historically the Coastal Commission has supported STRs in the Coastal Zone as a visitor-serving use, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of Commission appeals of STRs regarding their impact on coastal neighborhoods. As such, Coastal staff supports the City’s current cap as the Coastal Commission explores how best to balance the needs housing availability and visitor access in coastal communities.
Staff Report: Introduction and First Reading of Short-term Rental Ordinance Amendments Page 6 February 13, 2024
Summary
Overall, the STR program has been successful since its adoption and the Administrative Rules and standards have proven effective. The collaborative efforts of staff and the community have created a well-regulated program. The program is also a significant revenue source for the City, contributing to the General Fund which supports City services and projects. The minor adjustments proposed in this updated ordinance continue the City’s commitment to periodically review the STR program and ensure the program supports the local economy and enhances residents' quality of life, all while emphasizing responsible tourism and preserving neighborhood character.
Following the first reading and introduction of the ordinance on February 13, the Council will conduct a second reading and public hearing on February 26 before considering adoption.
Pending final adoption of the ordinance by the Council, staff will forward the LCP amendment to the Coastal Commission for review. The amended ordinance would become effective the day after Coastal Commission action.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action is not a project within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., “CEQA”) and CEQA Guidelines (Title 14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq.) Section 15378(b)(5). The revisions to the Shortterm Rental Ordinance are administrative and will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and are therefore exempt from CEQA.
ALTERNATIVES
The Council has the following alternatives to consider:
1. Conduct first reading, by title only, and introduce the amendments to the City’s Short-term Rental Ordinance, amending Grover Beach Municipal Code, Article IX and schedule second reading and adoption of the Ordinance and a Resolution approving a Local Coastal Program Amendment at the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting; or
2. Provide alternative direction to staff.
FISCAL IMPACT
The adoption of this ordinance regulating Short-Term Rentals would not have a significant fiscal impact. The cost associated with issuance and renewal of permits and regulation of STRs is recouped as part of the annual permitting fee.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
The agenda was posted in accordance with the Brown Act.
Attachments
1. Short-Term Rental Ordinance
2. LCP Amendment Resolution
3. Revised STR Administrative Rules
4. Grover Beach STR Ordinance Survey
Attachment 1
ORDINANCE NO. 24-XX
AN AMENDMENT OF ORDINANCE 19-04 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GROVER BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTIONS 4.10.185 AND 9.10.050, OF THE GROVER BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE ARTICLE IX TO
REGULATE SHORT-TERM RENTALS
WHEREAS, the City of Grover Beach (“City”) is a general law city and a political subdivision of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the City Council (“Council”) adopted Ordinance No. 19-04 amending Article IX of the Grover Beach Municipal Code and adopting a Local Coastal Program Amendment to regulate short-term rentals on private property in the City; and WHEREAS, City staff has committed to regular reviews to identify program deficiencies and areas for policy improvement or refinement to the short-term rental (“STR”) program; and WHEREAS, the Council received an update on the implementation of the City’s STR Program on August 28, 2023, and provided policy direction related to the city’s administration of waitlist procedures, local contacts, STRs within Accessory Dwelling Units, required annual minimum stays, and amending the number of non-owner occupied permits; and WHEREAS, this amendment is not a project within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., “CEQA”) and CEQA Guidelines (Title 14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq.) Section 15378 and is therefore exempt from CEQA because it will not result in any direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GROVER BEACH DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Part 1. Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated as though fully set forth herein.
Part 2. Article IX Development Code, Chapter 4 Standards for Specific Development and Land Uses, Short-Term Rental Ordinance Section 4.10.185.B entitled “Applicability” is hereby amended to read as follows:
B. Applicability.
1. The provisions of this Section shall apply to all short-term rental units, including owner occupied and non-owner occupied short-term rentals. All standards of the underlying zone shall continue to apply to a permitted short-term rental. This Section does not apply to legally established lodging uses, which are regulated separately.
2. Short-term rental units shall only be allowed within a legally constructed single-unit dwelling, multi-unit dwelling, multi-unit dwellings within a mixed-use project, or mobile home as defined in Section 9.10.020, except short-term rentals shall be prohibited in the following types of dwellings: live-work units, caretaker residences, Single Room Occupancy Facilities (Section 4.10.200), Two-Unit Housing Development projects (Section 4.25.060), Urban Lot Splits (Section 8.160), Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (Section 4.10.015). Short-term rental permits shall be limited to Ordinance No. 24-XX Page 2 of 3
the issuance of one permit per property or one permit per building when units share common walls within multi-unit dwellings or within a mixed-use project for all new permits issued after October 1, 2021.
3. Short-term rentals shall be prohibited in any residence subject to an affordable housing covenant or deed restriction imposed or required by the city.
4. Short-term rentals shall be prohibited in recreational vehicles, motor homes, travel trailers, truck campers, tent trailers, boats and other similar vehicles.
Part 3. Article IX Development Code, Chapter 4 Standards for Specific Development and Land Uses, Short-Term Rental Ordinance Section 4.10.185.H.4 entitled “Local Contact Person” is hereby amended to read as follows:
4. Local Contact Person. Short-term rental units shall have a local contact person who is available 24-hours per day, seven days per week. The local contact person must be able to be present at the short-term rental within 45 minutes of receiving a complaint at all times the short-term rental is operational. The contact information shall be submitted to the City when an application for permit is submitted and the owner shall immediately provide the city in writing of any change to the local contact person.
Part 4. Article IX Development Code, Chapter 4 Standards for Specific Development and Land Uses, Short-Term Rental Ordinance Section 4.10.185.L entitled “Permit Revocation” Subsection 9 is hereby amended to read as follows:
9. If the subject property no longer provides adequate onsite parking, as required under this Section and set forth in Subsection H.3., or changes to the property have occurred that would prevent ingress and/or egress access to the subject property or adjacent properties.
Part 5. Article IX Development Code, Chapter 4 Standards for Specific Development and Land Uses, Short-Term Rental Ordinance Section 4.10.185.P entitled “Effect of Ordinance on Existing Short-Term Rentals” is hereby removed and replaced with a new Subsection P entitled “Legal Non-Compliant Short-Term Rentals” to read as follows:
P. Non-Compliant Short-Term Rentals. Short-Term Rentals with a valid permit, issued prior to any amendments to this Section, shall continue to be operated consistent with the original approval, however, renewal of any existing Short-Term Rental Permit shall only be allowed if the Short-Term Rental meets all applicable requirements of this Section at the time of renewal.
Part 6. Article IX Development Code, Chapter 4 Standards for Specific Development and Land Uses, Short-Term Rental Ordinance Section 4.10.185.Q entitled “Effect of Ordinance on Existing or Proposed Accessory Dwelling Units” is hereby amended to read as follows:
Q. Effect of Ordinance on Existing or Proposed Accessory Dwelling Units. Short-Term Rental Permits that have been issued for a Short-Term Rental within an Accessory Dwelling Unit, Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit, or residential development project established under the HOME Act (Government Code Section 65852.21 and 66411.7), shall be considered noncompliant Short-Term Rentals. Notwithstanding their designation as a non-compliant ShortTerm Rental, any Short-Term Rental permitted within any residence described herein shall not be eligible for renewal.
Ordinance No. 24-XX Page 3 of 3
Part 7. Article IX Development Code, Chapter 9 Definitions, Section 9.10.050 Short-Term Rental Definitions are hereby amended as follows:
9.10.050 Short-Term Rental Definitions
“Local Contact Person” means the person designated on the short-term rental permit who shall be available 24-hours a day, seven days a week for the purpose of responding inperson to the short-term rental site within 45 minutes of receiving a complaint regarding the condition, operation, or conduct of guests and is authorized by the owner to take remedial action and who responds to violations.
Part 8. Severability. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this ordinance as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.
Part 9. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions. The provisions of this ordinance shall govern and supersede any other provisions of the Grover Beach Municipal Code as heretofore adopted by the City of Grover Beach that are in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance.
Part 10. Effective Date. This amendment shall not become effective and in full force and effect until 12:01 a.m. on the thirtieth day after adoption by the City Council, or 12:01 a.m. on the day after final certification by the California Coastal Commission, whichever occurs later. However, within fifteen (15) days after adoption by the City Council, the Ordinance shall be published once, together with the names of the Council Members voting thereon, in a newspaper of general circulation within the City.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council held on February 13, 2024 and PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council on the February 26, 2024, on the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members -
NOES: Council Members -
ABSENT: Council Members -
ABSTAIN: Council Members -
RECUSED: Council Members -
___________________________________
KAREN BRIGHT, MAYOR
Attest:
______________________________
WENDI SIMS, CITY CLERK
Approved as to Form:
_____________________________
ROBERT LOMELI, CITY ATTORNEY
** D R A F T **
Attachment 2
RESOLUTION NO. 24-__
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GROVER BEACH,
CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TO SUBMIT THE LOCAL COASTAL
IMPLEMENTATION AMENDMENT ASSOCIATED WITH AMENDMENTS TO
ORDINANCE NO. 19-04 TO THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION FOR
FINAL CERTIFICATION
WHEREAS, the Local Coastal Program Amendment associated with Ordinance No. 19- 04 would amend the City’s Short-Term Rental Ordinance in the Development Code; and WHEREAS, the Ordinance requires a Local Coastal Program Amendment because it is amending Development Code Chapters 4, and 9; and
WHEREAS, the Local Coastal Program Amendment is intended to be carried out in a manner that is fully in conformity with the Coastal Act; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 6, 2024, and recommended the City Council approve the Development Code Amendment and Local Coastal Program Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the amendments are not a project within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., “CEQA”) and CEQA Guidelines (Title 14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq.) Section 15378 because the amendments will not result an direct or indirect physical change in the environment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council at its meeting on February 13, 2024, conducted the first reading of Ordinance No. 24-02; and
WHEREAS, the City Council at its meeting on February 26, 2024, adopted Ordinance No. 24-02; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Local Coastal Program Amendment will take effect automatically upon final certification by the Coastal Commission unless revisions are made by the Coastal Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Grover Beach DOES HEREBY AUTHORIZE AND DIRECT the Community Development Director to submit a Development Code amendment to amend the City’s adopted Short-Term Rental Ordinance associated with Ordinance No. 19-04, to the California Coastal Commission for final certification.
Resolution No. 24-__ LCP Amendment for Ordinance Regulating Short-Term Rentals
Upon motion by Council Member ____, second by Council Member ____, and on the following roll call vote:
AYES: Council Members
NOES: Council Members –
ABSENT: Council Members –
ABSTAIN: Council Members –
the foregoing Resolution was PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at the Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Grover Beach, California, this February 26, 2024. ____________________________
KAREN BRIGHT, MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________
WENDI SIMS, CITY CLERK
Attachment 3
City of Grover Beach │ Short-Term Rental Administrative Rules City of Grover Beach │ Short-Term Rental Administrative Rules December 2021 Update http://str.groverbeach.org Page i
Table of Contents
1. Glossary ............................................................................................................................ 1
2. Introduction....................................................................................................................... 4
3. Key Dates and Deadlines ................................................................................................. 4
4. Number of Short-Term Rentals Allowed.......................................................................... 5
5. Short-Term Rental Permits............................................................................................... 5
6. Business Tax Certificate ...............................................................................................109
7. Payment of TOT/TMD Taxes..........................................................................................109
8. Short-Term Rental Operator Regulations.......................................................................10
9. Violations......................................................................................................................1615
10. Revocation of Permit ...................................................................................................1817 Appendix
Appendix A TOT / TMD Submittal Form
Appendix B TOT / TMD Exception Form
Appendix C Owner-Occupied Self Certification Form
Appendix D Non-Owner-Occupied Inspection Checklist
City of Grover Beach │ Short-Term Rentals Administrative Rules December 2021February 2024 Update http://str.groverbeach.org Page 1
1. Glossary
This glossary provides definitions for terms used in the City of Grover Beach Short-Term Rental Administrative Rules and Regulations.
Accessory Dwelling Unit A legally permitted residential unit, either separated or detached, located on the same residential parcel/lot as the primary residential unit. Includes Junior Accessory Dwelling Units as defined under Government Code Section 65852.22(i)(1).
Administrative Rules The City Manager, or designee, shall have the authority to establish administrative rules and regulations consistent with the provisions of this Section for the purpose of interpreting, clarifying, carrying out, furthering, and enforcing the requirements and the provisions of this Section, and establishing procedures for complaints. A copy of such administrative rules and regulations shall be on file in the office of the city clerk and posted on the city's website.
Advertise The publication of any statements, phrases, words, photographs, drawings or other images for the purpose of informing any member of the public of the ability or availability to use a specific dwelling unit for short-term rental purposes including but not be limited to verbal, written, printed, electronic, televised or broadcast set forth or contained in any newspaper, magazine, newsletter, website, solicitation, handbill, business card, flyer, outdoor advertising display, billboard, cable, satellite or digital radio or television broadcast, social networking site or any other electronic and digital media.
Application A public document completed and filed to the City of Grover Beach that requests permission to operate a short-term rental business for a property located within the City of Grover Beach.
Bedroom Any habitable room normally occupied with no less than 70 square feet of floor area and no horizontal dimension less than seven feet with at least one wall located along an exterior wall with a window and equipped with a heating source as required by the California Building Code.
Brochure A document prepared by the City that summarizes the general rules of conduct and applicable short-term rental regulations to be adhered to by renters.
BTC Business Tax Certificate is a tax payable when the City issues a Business Tax Certificate by every person conducting, carrying on, or managing any business within the City of Grover Beach.
City of Grover Beach │ Short-Term Rental Administrative Rules December 2021November 2023 Update http://str.groverbeach.org Page 2 Development Code The City of Grover Beach zoning and development regulations known as Article IX in the Grover Beach Municipal Code.
City The City of Grover Beach comprising of all lots within its incorporated City Limit line.
City Council The City Council of the City of Grover Beach.
GBMC The Grover Beach Municipal Code.
Guest An invitee of a renter or other person visiting a renter of a shortterm rental unit who does not rent the unit. Guests shall only be allowed at the short-term rental between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. unless they intend to occupy the unit for the evening consistent with Section 8.(F).
Hotline The telephonic service or electronic messaging service operated by or for the City for the purpose of receiving complaints regarding the operation of any Short-Term Rental and forwarding the complaints to the local contact person.
Hosting Platform An internet based service, or property management company that provides advertisement for a short-term rental property.
Legally Permitted A residential dwelling unit, remodel, or addition that has been issued a building permit by the City, or the County prior to incorporation.
Local Contact Person A person designated on the short-term rental permit, whom shall be available 24-hours a day, seven days a week for the purpose of responding in-person to the short-term rental site within 30 45 minutes of receiving a complaint regarding the condition, operation, or conduct of guests and is authorized by the owner to take remedial action and who responds to violations. The Local Contact Person must respond to the complaint regarding the condition, operation, or conduct of guests within 30 minutes of receiving a complaint.
Non-Owner-Occupied A short-term rental in which the owner does not reside on the property during the time a renter is occupying the residence.
Operator A person that is operating an STR either as an authorized agent for an owner (property manager), or as a legal occupant of the long-term rental with landlord permission.
Owner-Occupied A short-term rental in which the owner resides on the property during the time a renter is occupying the residence.
Owner A person or entity holding legal title and/or equitable title to the real property that is the subject of a short-term rental permit.
City of Grover Beach │ Short-Term Rentals Administrative Rules December 2021February 2024 Update http://str.groverbeach.org Page 3 Permittee The applicant (property owner) that has been issued a ShortTerm Rental Permit.
Residential Unit A building or portion thereof designed for or occupied in its entirety or in part, as a home, residency, or sleeping place, either permanently or temporarily, and containing not more than one kitchen per residential unit.
Renter A person renting or occupying a short-term rental property in accordance with the GBMC. For purposes of these regulations, “renter” shall have the same meaning as “transient,” as defined in Municipal Code Article X Chapter 6.
Short-Term Rental The rental of a private residence, or any portion of the private residence, for thirty or less consecutive days for which a rental contract for occupancy has been made which the short-term rental use is permitted to operate, pursuant to a current and valid short-term rental permit on file with the city. A short-term rental may be either an owner-occupied or non-owner-occupied shortterm rental.
STR Permit An issued document that allows a rental of a residential unit for a period of less than 30 consecutive calendar days or less, subject to all applicable City development code regulations, permit/licensing requirements, and payment of fees and/or taxes, including transient occupancy tax, and tourism marketing district taxes as defined in the GBMC.
STR Permit Renewal A Short-Term Rental Permit Renewal Application to continue operation of an existing Short-Term Rental that the owner of a Residential Unit must fill out and submit to the City’s Community Development Department by July 31st of each year to renew their permit.
Stay A stay is considered the rental periodovernight
accommodations in which a residential unit is occupied by a renter. The term stay may be interchangeable with reference to number of nights.
TOT Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) is charged for the privilege of occupancy in a residential unit. Each transient is subject to and shall pay a tax in the amount of twelve (12%) percent of the rent charged by the operator. Said tax constitutes a debt owed by the transient to the City which is extinguished only by payment to the operator.
TMD Tourism Marking District (TMD), requires that all operators who collect Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) within the County also begin remitting an additional 1.5% of taxable rents beginning with rents collected on July 1, 2020. The District is designed to City of Grover Beach │ Short-Term Rental Administrative Rules December 2021November 2023 Update http://str.groverbeach.org Page 4 provide funding for County-wide marketing, advertising, promotions and sales efforts on behalf of the assessed
businesses.
2. Introduction
The City Council adopted a shortShort-term Term rental Rental (STR) ordinance on June 17, 2019 that established a permitting process for all STRs and regulations for all STRs operating in the City. The Ordinance number 19-04 is codified in the Grover Beach Municipal Code (GBMC) Article IX Development Code Chapter 4 Section 4.10.185. The Ordinance authorizes the City Manager to establish administrative Administrative rules Rules and regulation consistent with the Ordinance for the purpose of interpreting, clarifying, carrying out, furthering, and enforcing the requirements of the Ordinance.
3. Key Dates and Deadlines
The following table sets forth key dates and deadlines for the City’s STR regulations.
Key Dates and Deadlines
September 11, 2019 California Coastal Commission approved local ordinance regulating Short-Term Rentals.
October 1, 2019 STR application and BTC application available on city’s website https://str.groverbeach.org . Applications accepted online only.
November 12, 2019 Enforcement of STRs that have not applied for permits begins.
December 31 of each year Business Tax Certificate renewals are due (sent via us mail by Administrative Services Department)
July 1- July 31 STR Permit Renewal Applications period. Renewals completed online only at https://str.groverbeach.org .
July 31 of each year Final day to apply for a renewal. If a renewal application is not received by July 31, the permit may be revoked
August 1 to July 31 Permits are valid from August 1 to July 31 of the next year (i.e. August 1, 2021 to July 31, 2022).
City of Grover Beach │ Short-Term Rentals Administrative Rules December 2021February 2024 Update http://str.groverbeach.org Page 5
4. Number of Short-Term Rentals Allowed
The Development Code establishes a maximum number of STRs for non-owner-occupied units (Development Code Section 4.10.185.G). A maximum of 40 non-owner-occupied STRs will be allowed on properties within the coastal Coastal zoneZone. A maximum of 60 non-owneroccupied STRs will be allowed on properties outside of the coastal Coastal zoneZone. There is no limit for the number of STR permits issued for owner-occupied units. Permits will be issued on a first come, first serve basis.
City Map – Maximum Number of Non-Owner-Occupied STRs
5. Short-Term Rental Permits
A. Application. An application must be completed on-line at https://str.groverbeach.org with all the required information and submitted with a fee approved in the City’s Master Fee Schedule. The City will review all information submitted, including a review of City building permits to ensure floor plans and site plans are in compliance with City records. If as part of the application review process it is determined that construction occurred at the residence without a valid building permit issued by the City, a code enforcement investigation will be opened and your STR application will be denied until building permits have been issued and the work is completed. Applications will be rejected if an open building permit is on file for the property. The following items are required to be submitted for an STR application.
60 STRs
40 STRs
City of Grover Beach │ Short-Term Rental Administrative Rules December 2021November 2023 Update http://str.groverbeach.org Page 6
1. Applicant Name – This is the name of the property owner. If you are a renter, the landlord’s name must appear on this line and match property records. A permit will be issued to the property owner.
2. Property Address – This is the address of the property. This must match property records maintained by the City.
3. Assessor’s Parcel Number – The is a property identification number issued by San Luis Obispo County Assessor’s Office. This number may be obtained by visiting either the County Assessor’s website https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Assessor/Services/Propert y-Information-Search.aspx or the City’s Zoning information website = https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1oxe-GE-bg8RPy7- FmIGbYTaoAjpyawT3&ll=35.12985372392944%2C120.62230030638129&z=18
3.4. Mailing Address – This is a mailing address where forms and other communications are to be sent. If this is the same as the property address type “same as property.”
4.5. Applicant Contact Number – This is a phone number to contact either the property owner or the authorized agent such as a property manager or renter. It is recommended this number be a mobile phone number.
5.6. Applicant Email Address – This is an email to contact either the property owner or the authorized agent such as a property manager or renter.
Assessor’s Parcel Number – The is a property identification number issued by San Luis Obispo County Assessor’s Office. This number may be obtained by visiting either the County Assessor’s website https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Assessor/Services/Propert y-Information-Search.aspx or the City’s Zoning information website =
6.7. Fee. An application fee is due at the time of permit registration. This fee covers the cost of City staff time and the City’s third party vendor that accepts the application, monitors the hotline, and performs other assigned contractual tasks. The application fee can change annually and is in the City’s Master Fee Schedule. The fee is not pro-rated at the time of permit registration. The third party vendor may charge a separate fee for credit card and Automated Clearing House (ACH) payments directly from a checking account.
7.8. Owner-Occupied - The owner resides on the property during the time a renter occupies the residence, between the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. To be considered an owner-occupied STR, you must submit a property tax bill that shows the “homeowner” exemption. If a renter, through permission from a landlord, is operating the STR, a copy of the lease shall be submitted in lieu of a property tax bill. A maximum of four (4) entire home stays up to a maximum of 30 days total, is City of Grover Beach │ Short-Term Rentals Administrative Rules December 2021February 2024 Update http://str.groverbeach.org Page 7 permitted, per permit year (July 1-June 30), to maintain owner-occupied status. In no instance can an owner-occupied permit holder utilize an on-site camper, RV, or stay in a tent, on the property to qualify for an owner-occupied permit.
8.9. Non-Owner-Occupied – The owner or entity does not reside permanently at the property and rents their entire home and is not present during the duration of the stay.
9.10. Local Contact – All STRs must provide a local contact person who is available 24-hours a day seven (7) days per week and must be located within a 30 45 minute drive of the short-term rental property.
The local contact must respond to a complaint within 30 minutes and be able to be present at the non-owner occupied dwelling within 30 45 minutes, if necessary. Typically for owner-occupied units, this is the owner, but may also include a secondary contact that is located within 30 45 minutes of the short-term rental property. City staff will contact the local contact person prior to permit issuance and renewal to verify their role.
10.11. Site Plan – A site plan showing the location of the residence, all buildings, and setbacks from property lines. An example of this is available at http://www.grover.org/DocumentCenter/View/8811/SitePlan-Example-GB?bidId= . Site Plan must indicate the location of parking, electrical meter, gas meter shutoff, and water shutoff valve.
This site plan needs to be to scale (i.e. 1 inch = 10 feet).
11.12. Floor Plan – A plan showing the entire floor plan (include all stories) of your residence must be included. Please indicate the location of the following: proposed room(s) to be used for short-term rentals, if using the entire house, indicate entire house, location of all smoke detectors, carbon monoxide detector(s), fire extinguisher within kitchen. Plans are to be completed to scale (i.e. 1 inch = 10 feet). An example is available at:
http://www.grover.org/DocumentCenter/View/8812/Floor-PlanExample-GB?bidId=.
12.13. Grant Deed – A grant deed is required for any short-term rental permit owned by a property for less than a year, and/or does not match City property records.
13.14. CC&Rs/HOA – These are required if your property was developed as a planned unit development (PUD), or your property is part of a Homeowners Association or has recorded Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions. A copy of these restrictions are typically included with your deed or escrow papers. If you need to obtain additional copies, you will need to visit the San Luis Obispo County Recorder’s Office.
14.15. Authorized Agent Form – This form is required if an application is being submitted by a property manager or renter with authorization City of Grover Beach │ Short-Term Rental Administrative Rules December 2021November 2023 Update http://str.groverbeach.org Page 8 from a landlord. This form is not required if you will be managing your own property. The form can be accessed at
http://grover.org/DocumentCenter/View/6732. This form is not required if you will be managing your own property.
A.B. Business Tax Certificate. Concurrent with an application for a STR permit, the applicant must submit an application for a business tax certificate (BTC). The applicant shall pay the minimum BTC amount, as established in the Master Fee Schedule. All short-term rental permittees shall renew their BTC when it is required by the Grover Beach Municipal Code.
B.C. Inspections. After a review of the initial application submittal, an inspection is required for all non-owner-occupied units prior to approval of an STR permit. An inspection checklist can be accessed at
http://www.grover.org/DocumentCenter/View/8893/Non-Owner-OccupiedInspection-Checklist?bidId=. Owner-occupied STRs must complete a selfcertification checklist and submit this with their application. This checklist is included in the appendix for both owner and non-owner-occupied units and can be accessed here: http://www.grover.org/DocumentCenter/View/8894.
C.D. Approval. After review of an STR application and inspection completed for non-owner-occupied STRs, the Community Development Director, or their designee shall approve a short-term rental permit if the owner/operator demonstrates compliance with the STR ordinance. In no instance shall an STR operator advertise or complete stays without a valid STR permit after November 12, 2019. Short-term rental permits shall be limited to the issuance of one permit per property or one permit per building when units share common walls within multi-unit dwellings or within a mixed-use project for all new permits issued after October 1, 2021.
D.E. Notification. City staff shall notify all property owners and occupants in writing within a 150-foot radius for a non-owner-occupied STR following approval of the STR permit. The information provided will include the rental address, the owner’s name, 24-hour phone number for complaints, and the maximum number of occupants. No notification is required for owner-occupied STRs.
E.F. Issuance of Certificate. A certificate will be issued via email to the applicant’s email, as provided in the application. This certificate will include the owner’s name, permit number, and date of approval. Permits shall be issued to the owner only. If a permittee does not receive their certificate, they should email city staff at [email protected] and request a copy. It is the responsibility of the permittee to transmit this certificate to their property manager.
F.G. Renewals. All STR permits shall expire on July 31st of each calendar year.
Renewal notices will be sent via the applicant’s email provided on or before July 1 st of each year. The permit holder shall submit the STR renewal fee as shown on the City’s Master Fee Schedule, along with required application submittal materials. Any STR permit not renewed on or before August 1st of each calendar year shall be considered expired and will need to re-submitted as a new STR permit. If there is a wait list, the permittee will be placed on this list.
City of Grover Beach │ Short-Term Rentals Administrative Rules December 2021February 2024 Update http://str.groverbeach.org Page 9 H. Wait List. Upon reaching the maximum number of non-owner-occupied STR permits issued, the City will establish a wait list. If a permit is not renewed, or a permit is revoked, staff will notify the waitlist applicant of availability and the waitlist applicant will have fifteen (15) calendar days to submit an application. The wait list form can be found here: https://forms.office.com/g/WAy6Y0pwrR . Applicants on the wait list should provide contact information including an up to date mailing address, email address, and phone number.
1. A waitlist applicant may be allowed one (1) “pass” and remain at their current position on the waitlist. Should the waitlist applicant be ineligible or “pass” at their next opportunity, they will be removed from the waitlist and required to reapply to be on the waitlist.
2. Only one residence per applicant shall be allowed on the waitlist at any given time.
G.3. To be eligible for the waitlist, the property must contain a legal established qualifying residence.
H.I.Permit Denials. An STR permit or renewal may be denied for the following reasons:
1. Code Violations or Life Safety Issues – At the time the short-term rental permit application or annual permit renewal is submitted, the short-term rental property has an active code violation related to structures, land use or life safety issues, including but not limited to illegal structures, conversion of space without a building permit, illegal room additions, etc.
2. Suspension or Revocation – The operator has had a prior short-term rental permit suspended or revoked or has been cited for violating any provision of this Section or the Municipal Code related to the use or maintenance of the property of the short-term rental in the prior two years.
3. CC&R Prohibition –If there is credible evidence that any private governing documents, including but not limited to, conditions, covenants and restrictions (“CC&Rs”) that are valid and enforceable pursuant to the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act, as set forth in California Civil Code Section 4000 et seq., which prohibit the use of such owner’s single-family dwelling, multi-family dwelling, or mobile home for use as an STR.
4. Lack of On-site Parking – The subject property lacks adequate on-site parking or impedes ingress and/or egress access to the subject property or adjacent properties.
5. Failure to Provide Information – The applicant/operator fails to provide any of the required application information or demonstrate compliance with the requirements of Development Code Section 4.10.185 or the Administrative Rules, which includes any additional information requested of City staff during the initial review period of a permit.
City of Grover Beach │ Short-Term Rental Administrative Rules December 2021November 2023 Update http://str.groverbeach.org Page 10
6. Business Tax Certificate
A Business Tax Certificate (BTC) is required along with an STR permit. An STR operator shall pay the minimum BTC amount. BTC’s are not pro-rated for operations associated with an STR.
BTC’s must be renewed on or before December 31 of each calendar year. BTC fees are separate from STR fees and TOT/TMD taxes. Renewals shall be remitted to the Administrative Services Department.
7. Payment of TOT/TMD Taxes
All STR operators must comply with the requirements, procedures, and schedule set forth in Article X, Chapter 6 of the GBMC regarding remittance of the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) and Tourism Marketing District (TMD) taxes to the City.
A. TOT / TMD Tax Rates. As of July 1, 2020, the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) is 12%. The tax rate for Tourism Marketing District (TMD) is 1.5%.
A.
B. Payment Due. Payment of TOT/TMD taxes are due on or before the last day of the month following the reporting period (i.e., June reporting period, due on July 31).
Postmarks are not accepted.
C. Payment. Payment of TOT/TMD may be made either online only at https://str.groverbeach.org, through electronic check or credit card / debit card, by clicking on the link “Make TOT Payments” or clicking this direct link:
https://secure.hostcompliance.com/grover-beach-ca/remit/registration_number. or by completing this form and remitted to the city with either cash or check. You may access this document at the following link: Payments are the responsibility of the permittee. Platforms such as Airbnb, VRBO, etc. do not remit these taxes to the City; therefore, it is the permittee’s responsibility to ensure payments are made.
D. Penalties. Penalties are due consistent with Article X, Chapter 6 of the GBMC.
E. Exception. Exceptions to payments of TOT/TMD shall be consistent with Article X, Chapter 6 of the GBMC and shall include proper documentation.
8. Short-Term Rental Operator Regulations
The following are regulations and clarifications for short-term rental operators. These regulations will be updated periodically for clarification of situations that may develop based on the implementation of the STR regulations within the City.
A. Owner-Occupied STR Requirements. The following are requirements that shall be adhered to qualify for an owner-occupied STR permit. If you do not meet these regulations, an STR permit shall be submitted as a non-owner-occupied STR.
1. During Stays. An owner must be in the residence or in another residence on the property during the time of a stay during the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.
City of Grover Beach │ Short-Term Rentals Administrative Rules December 2021February 2024 Update http://str.groverbeach.org Page 11
2. Property Verification. At the time of application, an owner must submit their property tax bill issued by the San Luis Obispo County Assessor’s office. This tax bill must contain the “homeowners exemption” line.
3. Multiple Units on a Property. An owner-occupied STR permit may be issued for a maximum of one unit when there are multiple units on the property, legally permitted, and if it is an ADU constructed prior to June 17, 2019. In no instance can an STR permit be issued for an ADU constructed after June 17, 2019. A non-owner-occupied permit may be issued for the primary unit when a newn ADU is constructed, and the owner occupies the ADU.
4. Use of Accessory Dwelling Units. Accessory dwelling units or the primary residence may be rented as an entire home stay if the following qualifications are met: the accessory dwelling unit was legally permitted prior to June 17, 2019, or the owner had applied for a building permit for an accessory dwelling unit on or before June 17, 2019; and the owner will reside in either the primary residence or accessory unit during the duration of a stay.
5.4. Use of Tiny Homes. Tiny homes on Wheels shall be prohibited from use as a short-term rental.
6. Entire Home Rental Exception. A maximum of 30 nights total, is permitted per permit year and still allow the owner-occupied status during a permit year (August 1 to July 31). In no instance may an accessory dwelling unit and the primary residence be rented simultaneously.
B. Non-Owner Occupied Requirements. The following are requirements that shall be adhered to in order to qualify for a non-owner-occupied STR permit.
1. Multiple Units on a Property. A non-owner-occupied STR permit shall be limited to the following:
a. Single-family residences. Lots with a legally permitted singlefamily residence, unless the property was developed in accordance with the provisions afforded under the HOME Act (Government Code 65852.21 or 66411.7). and a secondarya secondary unit (e.g., guesthouse, accessory dwelling unit (ADU) ), legally permitted or constructed prior to June 17, 2019, shall be limited to the issuance of one (1) STR permit. b. Multifamily residential development on a single lot (e.g., apartments) . STR permit issuance after August 1, 2021, shall be limited to one (1) unit per building when units share common walls.
2. Use of Accessory Dwelling Units. An accessory dwelling unit shall not be used as an STR for non-owner-occupied units.
City of Grover Beach │ Short-Term Rental Administrative Rules December 2021November 2023 Update http://str.groverbeach.org Page 12
3. Use of a Tiny Home. Tiny homes on Wheels shall be prohibited from use as a short-term rental.
C. Local Contact Person. A non-owner-occupied STR permit must include a local contact person. The local contact shall respond to a complaint within 30 minutes and be present at the STR within 3045-minutes of receiving a complaint at all times. An owner-occupied unit must include a secondary local contact person at the time of application, if the owner will utilize the entire home rental exception in Section 8.A.5.
1. Verification. City staff will verify the address provided for the local contact person(s) meets the 3045-minute response time by calculating the travel time from the local contact person’s address to the address of the STR using Google Maps, or similar mapping program, for a Saturday at 8:00 p.m. to determine travel time.
2. Phone Number. Local contact shall provide a phone number to be contacted by City Staff, or contracted third party. A toll-free number or answering service is acceptable, provided that the local contact responds to complaints as outline in this section.
3. Travel Time outside of 30 45 minutes. If city staff determines that the local contact person is outside the 3045-minute response travel time, the applicant must choose a new local contact person that meets the minimum criteria. No permit will be issued without a local contact person that meets these criteria.
4. Response to Complaints. The local contact person shall have 30 minutes to respond to a complaint that is logged by the City’s contracted third partythird-party vendor, or the City Police Department. If a telephonic message, text, or email is left or sent by either the third party vendor, or the City Police Department, the local contact shall respond by either calling the renters or going to the rental within 30 45 minutes of receiving this message.
5. Follow-up. The local contact shall reply to the City’s third partythirdparty vendor, and email city staff at [email protected] within 24 hours of the complaint and include the following:
a. Acknowledgement of the complaint received
b. Resolution of complaint
6. Change in local contact. Permittee shall notify city staff within 24 hours of a change to the designated local contact and provide the following:
name, address, email, and telephone number.
Hotline/Complaints. The City shall establish and maintain a non-emergency 24- hour hotline telephone number and electronic messaging system for the express purpose of receiving complaints regarding the operation of any short-term rental property and will forward those complaints to the local contact person for immediate resolution of the complaint, and/or, if necessary, to the Grover Beach Police Department if the complaint has not been resolved within 30 minutes of the initial call to the hotline, consistent with GBMC Article I, Chapter 4.
1. Information Collected. The hotline shall maintain a record of complaints received that include the following information:
a. Date and time of complaint;
City of Grover Beach │ Short-Term Rentals Administrative Rules December 2021February 2024 Update http://str.groverbeach.org Page 13 b. Nature of complaint;
c. Address of the short-term rental property that is the subject of the complaint;
d. Complainant’s name, address and contact information; e. Actions taken by the hotline attendant in response to the complaint including, but not limited to: persons contacted, including law enforcement, if applicable, and date and time of actions taken in response to complaint; and
f. Corrective action taken by the local contact person in response to complaint.
2. Duration of Registered Complaint. All complaints shall be kept for a maximum of three (3) years from the date the complaint was received.
3. Notification. The owner/operator shall receive a copy of the complaint received through electronic communications (i.e., email).
D. Advertising. The following are requirements to be placed on listing for all platforms and advertisements for STRs.
1. Permit Number. All STR advertisements shall include “Grover Beach STR Permit _____”. This information shall be located in the platform rental summary near the top of the advertisement printed in the same size font as the largest font used in the summary.
2. Maximum Number of Occupants. All STR advertisements shall also include the maximum number of permitted overnight occupants which shall be equal to or less than the maximum number of occupants on the approved STR Permit.
3. Temporary/Permanent Signage. All owners/operators shall not place any signage on the property indicating the use of the property as a short-term rental for safety of guests and owner/operators.
E. Responsible Party. As a part of an STR stay or rental, a responsible party must be designated. The responsible party is the person that signs the STR contract, either through a physical form or through a hosting platform. The responsible person is responsible for ensuring all guests and occupants comply with the STR regulations at all times.
F. Rental Unit Requirements. The following are requirements for all rental units or rooms that are to be occupied by guests.
1. Property maintenance. The property is well maintained and clean appearance and is consistent with the submitted site plan.
2. Legible Street Address. The property’s street address numbers are clearly visible from the street using 4-inch numbers and contrast to the color of the mounting surface.
City of Grover Beach │ Short-Term Rental Administrative Rules December 2021November 2023 Update http://str.groverbeach.org Page 14
3. Trash / Recycling. Appropriate trash and recycling containers are not visible from the street and accessible to the renter.
4. Exterior Gates. Exterior gates leading to and from the front, side, and/or back yards are not padlocked and can be used in case of an emergency.
5. Required Parking Location and Surfaces. All residences must meet the minimum parking requirements in Development Code Section 3.50.
Surface parking spaces must be a minimum of 9 feet by 18 feet located on an approved hardscape material (Section 4.10.185.H.3). Hardscape materials shall include concrete, asphalt, pavers, gravel base and other acceptable materials as determined by the City Manager. Hardscape materials do not include lawn, landscape areas, dirt, or mulch. Parking spaces shall not block existing sidewalks or if no sidewalk exists, the parking spaces shall not be within the future location of the public sidewalk. If you have questions about the location of future sidewalks, please contact the City’s Public Works Department at (805) 473-4530.
6. Emergency Map. An emergency exit map is posted in an area visible to the renter that illustrates how to exit the property in the event of an emergency.
7. Hallway / Exit Doors. Hallway and exit doors are operational and not obstructed.
8. Double Keys Dead Bolt. Doubled-keyed dead bolt locks are prohibited on all exit doors and must not be present.
9. Minimum Sleeping Room Size. Bedrooms or sleeping rooms occupied by renters shall be a minimum of 7 feet in all directions and not less than 70 square feet in area and have an egress window and door.
10. Carbon Monoxide Detector. All STRs shall have a minimum of one carbon monoxide detector with AC power and a battery back-up. This is to be located either in the common room for a residential unit.
11. Smoke Detector. Smoke detectors shall be operational at all times.
Smoke detectors shall be either DC (direct current) with a 10-year battery life or AC (alternating current) with a battery back-up. There shall be a smoke detector located in each bedroom rented as a STR and the hall leading to the bedroom(s). If a living room or sleeping couch is utilized, a smoke detector must also be in place in that area.
12. Fire Extinguisher. All STRs shall one fire extinguisher located in or near the kitchen.
13. Fire Sprinklers. Residences with existing fire sprinkler systems shall have an annual fire sprinkler system inspection indicating the system has “passed”. An STR Permit cannot be issued until an inspection has City of Grover Beach │ Short-Term Rentals Administrative Rules December 2021February 2024 Update http://str.groverbeach.org Page 15 been performed and passed. Any required repairs shall be performed by a licensed C-16 fire sprinkler contractor prior to issuance of an STR permit.
14. Placement of Permit. The owner/operator shall post the City issued STR permit in a location visible to guests.
15. Good Neighbor Brochure. The owner/operator shall provide the responsible party with the City’s good neighbor brochure either by hardcopy or a link to the City’s website. This link should be included in any “rules” established by the owner/operator.
G. Inspections. For non-owner-occupied units, an inspection shall be completed by city staff prior to issuance of an STR permit to verify the application materials and ensure the STR requirements have been met. A copy of the Non-Owner-Occupied Inspection Checklist is available as a part of the appendix. For owner-occupied STR units, a self-certification inspection is required and needs to be submitted concurrently with an STR application. A copy of the Owner-Occupied Self Certification Checklist is included as a part of the appendix.
City staff may inspect any STR if there is “good cause” for potential violations including but not limited to hotline complaints, code enforcement complaints, notifications from hosting platforms of potential violations, etc. City staff shall notify the owner/operator of an inspection and the owner/operator shall allow an inspection within 72-hours of the notification. A notice of violation may be issued if violations are found.
H. Transfer/Change in Ownership. If the title changes from a person a living trust, where the owners are named as the trustees, notification to the City is required but a new application is not required.
If a STR permit was revoked or suspended and a new STR application is submitted indicating a change of ownership, all previous owners shall be prohibited from being part of the new ownership and the new STR application cannot include a spouse or other immediate family member (e.g., siblings, children, parents, grandparents), a change to ownership percentage, name change, or transfer to spouse or other family member (e.g., siblings, children, parents, grandparents).
The City Manager may request additional ownership documents and information to ascertain if the change in ownership is an attempt to allow the STR to be operated by another family member. The City Manager in his independent judgement may deny the new STR permit based on the determination that the new ownership is not a complete change in ownership.
In no event may a permit be transferred when a property is purchased. New owners must apply for a separate permit, and submit all required documents, and fees, etc. If there are no permits available, the new property owner may submit a form to be placed on the waitlist.
I. Minimum Number of Overnight Stays to Maintain Valid Permit. All permits shall have a minimum of 12 overnight stays during the permit year, July 1 through June City of Grover Beach │ Short-Term Rental Administrative Rules December 2021November 2023 Update http://str.groverbeach.org Page 16
30. If an owner does not comply with the minimum number of 12 stays, the permit will be revoked.
9. Violations
Notice of Violations shall be issued to operators of Short-Term Rentals based on the following rules.
1. Advertising without a STR Permit number listed. All permitted shortterm rentals must include their STR number in all advertisements or may result in a violation as follows:
a. A Notice of Violation letter or email will be sent to operators / permittees, providing 14-days to update listings with required information.
b. If the violation remains after 14 days, a follow-up letter / email will be provided to come into compliance, within 7 days. c. If the violation remains, or another violation is found within 90 days, a citation may be issued.
2. Disturbance of the peace violation. A police report is taken for disturbing the peace with a renter / guest staying at an STR shall result in a violation as follows:
a. 1
st Violation within 90 days. A citation may be issued.
b. 2
nd Violation within 90 days. A citation may be issued.
c. 3
rd Violation within 90 day is cause for permit revocation consistent with Development Code Section 4.10.185.L.
3. Failure to Remit Required Taxes. Taxes are required to be remitted, or reported each month, even if no stays are completed. Failure to pay taxes in a timely manner shall result in the following:
a. Fines shall be levied consistent with GBMC Article X, Chapter
6. b. Failure to Make Payments – If TOT or TDM taxes are not remitted in accordance with GBMC Article X, Chapter 6 after 90 days this shall be cause for permit revocation consistent with Development Code Section 4.10.185.L
4. Failure of Local Contact to Respond. A local contact shall respond to a call from the City’s third partythird-party vendor within 30 minutes as required by Section 8.C.3. If a local contact does not respond to this phone call as required by Section 8.C.3, this shall result in a violation as follows:
a. First violation, a letter / email will be issued by City staff warning the permittee and the local contact to respond to all calls within 30 minutes.
b. 2
nd Violation within 90 days, a citation may be issued
c. 3
rd Violation within 90 days, a 2nd citation may be issued d. 4
th Violation within 90 days is cause for permit revocation consistent with Development Code Section 4.10.185.L.
e. One violation is considered a call between a 48-hour period (i.e. multiple calls on a weekend is considered one violation).
City of Grover Beach │ Short-Term Rentals Administrative Rules December 2021February 2024 Update http://str.groverbeach.org Page 17
5. Occupancy Limit Violation. Hosting renters beyond the allowed limit of your permit occupancy shall result in a violation as follows:
a. a. First Violation. A letter shall be sent to the property owner informing them of the violation. Property owner must ensure total number of guests match their allowed occupancy. If there is a police report taken this may be waived to an citation. b. b. 2nd Violation. A citation may be issued. A violation is considered a documented stay identified by the City’s 3rd party vendor within 90 days.
c. c. 3rd Violation. A citation may be issued. A violation is considered a 2nd documented stay identified by the City’s 3rd party vendor within 90 days.
6. Operation of a Short-Term Rental without a Permit. It is illegal to operate a short-term rental without a valid permit. Operations without a STR Permit shall result in the issuance of a Notice of Violation as follows:
a. First Violation. A letter shall be sent to the property owner informing them of the violation and 14 days to comply with either submittal for a permit or removal of the advertisement. b. 2
nd Violation. A citation may be issued. A violation is considered a documented stay identified by the City’s third party vendor within one year.
c. 3
rd Violation. A citation may be issued. A violation is considered a second documented stay identified by the City’s third party vendor within one year.
d. Code enforcement case to be referred to the City Attorney.
7. Noise Violations. No music, musical instrument, phonograph, compact disk player, loudspeaker, karaoke machine, sound amplifier, or any machine, device or equipment that produces or reproduces any sound shall be used outside or be audible from the outside of any short-term rental between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. and the operation of a Short-Term Rental shall be in compliance with the City’s Noise Ordinance at all times. Failure to comply with the above shall result in a violation as follows:
a. First Violation. A copy of a signed sworn statement by the responding officer along with a warning letter shall be provided to the permittee and local contact.
b. 2
nd Violation within 90 days, a citation may be issued.
c. 3
rdViolation within 90 days, a citation may be issued.
d. 4
th Violation within 90 days is cause for permit revocation consistent with Development Code Section 4.10.185.L.
e. One violation is considered a call between a 48-hour period (i.e. multiple calls on a weekend is considered one violation).
8. Trash Violations.
a. 1
st Violation. A warning letter / email will be sent to the permittee and or local contact. Trash cans shall be removed from the rightof-way within 48 hours of receipt of the letter / email.
City of Grover Beach │ Short-Term Rental Administrative Rules December 2021November 2023 Update http://str.groverbeach.org Page 18 b. 2
nd Violation within 90 days. A 2nd warning letter / email will be sent to the permittee / local contact. Trash cans shall be removed from the right-of-way within 48 hours of receipt of the letter / email.
c. 3
rd Violation and subsequent violations within 90 days. A citation may be issued.
9. Other Violations. Other violations shall be reviewed by the Community Development Director to determine severity of violations.
10. Revocation of Permit
Revocation of a STR permit shall be consistent with Development Code Section 4.10.185.L and M.
Short-term Rental Ordinance Survey 2024
1 / 8
71.77% 89
10.48% 13
20.97% 26
30.65% 38
5.65% 7
1.61% 2
9.68% 12
1.61% 2
Q1 Which best describes you? (Select all that apply)
Answered: 124 Skipped: 0
Total Respondents: 124
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Homeowner
Renter
Own property
but do not l...
Short-term
Rental Operator
Neighbor to
Short-term...
Property
Management...
Business Owner
Other (please
specify)
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Homeowner
Renter
Own property but do not live here
Short-term Rental Operator
Neighbor to Short-term Rental
Property Management Company
Business Owner
Other (please specify)
Attachment 4
Short-term Rental Ordinance Survey 2024
2 / 8
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
5.69% 7
25.20% 31
29.27% 36
25.20% 31
14.63% 18
Q2 Age Range
Answered: 123 Skipped: 1
TOTAL 123
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Under 18
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Under 18
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+
Short-term Rental Ordinance Survey 2024
3 / 8
16.67% 20
26.67% 32
30.83% 37
17.50% 21
8.33% 10
Q3 Please rate your overall satisfaction with the current Short-term Rental Ordinance in Grover Beach.
Answered: 120 Skipped: 4
TOTAL 120
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Very satisfied
Satisfied
Neither
satisfied no...
Dissatisfied
Very
dissatisfied
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Very satisfied
Satisfied
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Short-term Rental Ordinance Survey 2024
4 / 8
18.18% 22
22.31% 27
34.71% 42
13.22% 16
11.57% 14
Q4 In your experience, how well do you feel the Short-term Rental Ordinance addresses the unique needs and challenges of the community of Grover Beach?
Answered: 121 Skipped: 3
TOTAL 121
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Very satisfied
Satisfied
Neither
satisfied no...
Dissatisfied
Very
dissatisfied
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Very satisfied
Satisfied
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Short-term Rental Ordinance Survey 2024
5 / 8
29.51% 36
22.95% 28
34.43% 42
3.28% 4
9.84% 12
Q5 How would you rate the impact of Short-term Rentals on your neighborhood’s overall character and livability?
Answered: 122 Skipped: 2
TOTAL 122
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Very satisfied
Satisfied
Neither
satisfied no...
Dissatisfied
Very
dissatisfied
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Very satisfied
Satisfied
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Short-term Rental Ordinance Survey 2024
6 / 8
43.36% 49
1.77% 2
38.94% 44
15.93% 18
Q6 FOR OPERATORS: Have you faced any challenges or difficulties in complying with the current regulations?
Answered: 113 Skipped: 11
TOTAL 113
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Not applicable
Yes
No
If Yes, please
specify..
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Not applicable
Yes
No
If Yes, please specify..
Short-term Rental Ordinance Survey 2024
7 / 8
35.25% 43
26.23% 32
38.52% 47
Q7 Are you aware of any Short-term Rentals in your neighborhood? Answered: 122 Skipped: 2
TOTAL 122
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Yes
No
If yes, have
STRs caused ...
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes
No
If yes, have STRs caused any issues? Please describe.
Short-term Rental Ordinance Survey 2024
8 / 8
6.67% 8
45.00% 54
48.33% 58
Q8 Do you believe there is a need for any adjustments or changes to the current Short-term Rental regulations?
Answered: 120 Skipped: 4
TOTAL 120
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Yes
No
If yes, please
specify.
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes
No
If yes, please specify.
Agenda Item No. 5
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council DATE: February 13, 2024 FROM: Matthew Bronson, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Megan Martin, Community Development Director Janet Reese, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Potential Programs/Projects for Inclusion in the 2023 State Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Application
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution to authorize staff to prepare and submit an application for a Community Development Block Grant to fund Phases 1 and 2 of the Ramona Garden Park Rehabilitation Project (CIP 1259).
BACKGROUND
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program authorizes the use of funds to assist low- and moderate-income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight. There are two types of CDBG programs:
“entitlement” and “non-entitlement”. Metropolitan cities and urban counties are entitled to receive annual grants under the “entitlement” program direct from HUD. Metropolitan cities are principal cities or Metropolitan Areas (MAs) or other cities within MAs that have populations of at least 50,000. Urban Counties are within MAs that have population of 200,000 or more excluding the population of metropolitan cities within their boundaries.
The City falls within the “non-entitlement” program which is administered by the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and where the City can apply for funding under a competitive application process. Since 2013, when the City started to apply under the nonentitlement program, the City has received grant awards for the following uses:
Waterline Improvement Project (2013, 2017, 2020) $5.9 million Subsistence Payments/Eviction Prevention Program (2013, 2017, 2020) $840,000 Security Deposits/Rapid Rehousing Program (2013, 2017, 2020) $303,000 Childcare Training Program (2020 Coronavirus) $51,000
Warming Center Operation Program (2020 Coronavirus) $163,000 Homeless Services Program (2020 Coronavirus) $256,000
Homeless Shelter Operation Program (2022) $500,000
Planning/Technical Studies (2013, 2017)* $200,000
Total $8.2 million
* Includes Housing Element Update, Economic Development Study, Senior Center Feasibility Study The City is required to conduct public outreach regarding potential CDBG-eligible projects that could be considered for an application, including holding a public hearing to discuss potential application(s) and allow for public input. On August 7, 2023, in anticipation of the NOFA release, Staff Report: 2023 Community Development Block Grant Application Page 2 February 13, 2024
staff held a public meeting to seek public input. This input included funding a childcare-related economic development program and a homeless shelter operations public service program. Staff also identified a potential public infrastructure park improvement project at Ramona Garden Park that could be eligible.
However, HCD did not release the NOFA as originally planned. Instead, only jurisdictions whose projects were applied for in 2020, but not yet funded due to insufficient funding, were eligible to apply for 2023 funding in October 2023. On January 31, 2024, HCD released an amendment that allows a jurisdiction to apply for up to one project that has been designed and is ready to construct to apply for funding, up to a maximum of $3.3 million. Jurisdictions are not eligible to request funds for programs. Therefore, the two potential programs previously suggested through public input are not eligible to be considered at this time.
Staff requests that the Council open a public hearing to seek public input, review potential eligible projects, and authorize staff to prepare and submit an application for the selected project.
Project Selection
In order to be considered eligible, a suggested project/activity must meet one or more of the three National Objectives listed in CDBG Federal Statutes:
• Benefit to low- and moderate-income persons;
• Prevention or elimination of slums and blight; or
• Meeting an urgent community need which pose an immediate threat to the health and welfare of the community (State designates when the “urgent need” objective is allowed for a NOFA).
The benefit to low- and moderate-income persons is the most predominately used National Objective. In order to benefit low- or moderate-income persons, the project must either benefit an area that is comprised of at least 51% low- or moderate-income households, or benefits individually qualified households (i.e., each household is income certified). 54% of the City’s households qualify as low- or moderate-income households, based on the 2015 American Community Survey.
In addition to meeting one of the three National Objectives, the project must also fall under one of the categories listed below.
• Public Improvements. Project must be located in and serve a predominantly residential area within the city. Examples include water and sewer facilities, flood and drainage facilities, accessibility related street improvements (i.e., curb ramps), and utilities. • Public Facility. Examples include acquisition, rehabilitation or new construction of buildings used for public purposes such as training, health services, education, senior and recreation centers, nutrition, shelter, day care, temporary housing and fire protection. • Housing Project:
• Multi-Family (five or more units at a specific site) Housing Rental Rehabilitation Project (with or without acquisition): loan for repairs and improvements of renteroccupied units for sites where the majority of the tenants qualify as low- or moderate-income households.
Staff Report: 2023 Community Development Block Grant Application Page 3 February 13, 2024
• Acquisition of Real Property for Multi-Family (five or more units at a specific site) Projects: acquisition of a site where the majority of the tenants qualify as low- or moderate-income households.
• Public Improvement Project in Support of New Housing: Examples include water and sewer facilities necessary to serve new housing developments designated for low- and moderate income households.
Potential CDBG Projects
In order to provide Council with a list of potential projects, staff reviewed Council-adopted policies, the City’s Capital Improvement Program, and the Water and Sewer Master Plans to propose the following potential project. The Council may want to discuss additional projects, including those that may be received during the public hearing.
Public Facility
• Ramona Garden Park Rehabilitation Project (CIP 1259): In late 2019, the Council entered in a consulting services agreement with RRM Design Group for development of the Ramona Garden Park Master Plan, which was subsequently adopted on November 16, 2020. The Council awarded the production of construction documents to the Wallace Group in May 2022.
In November 2022, the Council reviewed the Master Plan and construction document details for Phases 1 and 2. Phase 1 includes a playground, relocation of the restroom, and general grading and utility work at the north side of the park. Phase 2 includes the construction of the amphitheater and the bandshell for concerts and other special events. Design for Phases 1 and 2 is complete and the estimated cost of the project is approximately $3,000,000.
FISCAL IMPACT
Adams Ashby Group, the City’s CDBG general administration consultant, estimates the cost to prepare the public facility application to be approximately $7,500. The costs associated with the preparation of applications is an eligible expenditure of existing CDBG funds. If awarded, design expenses will be eligible to be reimbursed and phases 1 and 2 of the Ramona Garden Park Rehabilitation Project will be funded.
ALTERNATIVES
The Council has the following alternatives to consider:
1. Adopt a Resolution to authorize staff to prepare and submit an application for Phases 1 and 2 of the Ramona Garden Park Rehabilitation Project (CIP 1259); or
2. Provide direction to staff.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
The public hearing notice was published in the Tribune and New Times, and posted on the City Hall Bulletin Board, City’s website, and City’s social media accounts consistent with HCD’s CDBG public noticing requirements on February 1, 2024. The agenda was posted in accordance with the Brown Act.
Attachments
1. Resolution
Resolution of the Governing Body
RESOLUTION NO. Insert Number
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR FUNDING AND THE
EXECUTION OF A GRANT AGREEMENT AND ANY AMENDMENTS
THERETO FROM THE 2023 AND/OR 2024 FUNDING YEAR OF THE STATE
CDBG PROGRAM
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Grover Beach as follows:
SECTION 1:
The City Council has reviewed and hereby approves the submission to the State of California of one or more application(s) in the aggregate amount, not to exceed, of $3,300,000 for the following CDBG activities, pursuant to the 2023 and 2024 CDBG NOFAs:
List activities and amounts
Activity (e.g. Public Services,
Infrastructure, etc.)
Dollar Amount Being Requested for
the Activity
Public Facilities – Ramona Garden Park $3,300,000
$
$
$
SECTION 2:
The City Council hereby approves the use of Program Income in an amount not to exceed $0 for the CDBG activities described in Section 1.
SECTION 3:
The City Council acknowledges compliance with all state and federal public participation requirements in the development of its application(s).
SECTION 4:
The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager or designee*, to execute and deliver all applications and act on the City’s behalf in all matters pertaining to all such applications.
Attachment 1
SECTION 5:
If an application is approved, the City Manager or designee*, is authorized to enter into, execute and deliver the grant agreement (i.e., Standard Agreement) and any and all subsequent amendments thereto with the State of California for the purposes of the grant.
SECTION 6:
If an application is approved, the City Manager or designee*, is authorized to sign and submit Funds Requests and all required reporting forms and other documentation as may be required by the State of California from time to time in connection with the grant.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grover Beach held on 2/13/2024 by the following vote:
AYES: Enter # of votes or names
NOES: Enter # of votes or names
ABSENT: Enter # absentees or names
ABSTAIN: Enter # of abstains or names
Enter Name and Title.
City Council
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
City of Grover Beach
I, Wendi B. Sims, City Clerk of the City of Grover Beach, State of California, hereby certify the above and foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of a resolution adopted by said City Council on this 13th day of February, 2024 and that said resolution has not been amended, modified, repealed, or rescinded since its date of adoption and is in full force and effect as of the date hereof.
Wendi B. Sims, City Clerk of the City of Grover Beach, State of California
By: Enter Name of City/County Clerk, Title.
Agenda Item No. 6
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council DATE: February 13, 2024 FROM: Matthew Bronson, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Steve Kahn, Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Gabriel Munoz-Morris, Senior Engineer
SUBJECT: Resolution Establishing Ramona Garden Park Rule 20A Utility Undergrounding District
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution establishing the Ramona Garden Park Utility Undergrounding District and authorize staff to work with Pacific Gas and Electric to pursue a Rule 20A utility undergrounding project at Ramona Garden Park.
BACKGROUND
The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has authorized electric utility providers to convert overhead utility lines and facilities to underground through a process outlined in Electric Rule 20. Specifically, Rule 20A allows for the conversion of qualifying overhead facilities to underground in jurisdictions with adopted resolutions for undergrounding districts through the use of Rule 20A credits. Credits are allocated to jurisdictions based on utility rates paid by rate payers in that area. The City of Grover Beach currently has $816,350 in Rule 20A credits that could be used for a utility undergrounding project in the city. The CPUC has guidelines for projects to qualify for Rule 20A credits which severely limits the projects a jurisdiction can prioritize for completion.
As a result of these minimum guidelines for Rule 20A projects, utility undergrounding projects utilizing Rule 20A credits typically cost several millions of dollars or more. In addition to these project guidelines, the CPUC has officially announced a wind-down of the Rule 20A program over the next 10 years and has directed utility providers to re-allocate Rule 20A credits for non-active communities to other active projects to prioritize project completion prior to the program sunset date in 2033. As a result of this direction from the CPUC, Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E), the electric utility provider in Grover Beach, reached out to the City to inform the City that the City’s credits would be re-allocated to another community’s project if the City did not identify a Rule 20A project to pursue making use of the credits it currently has available and become an “active” community in the Rule 20A program.
There are various areas in the city that could be prioritized to convert overhead utilities to underground but the Rule 20A credit amount and minimum project guidelines for Rule 20A projects limit projects the City could propose for approval by the CPUC and PG&E. The City could pursue an undergrounding project that does not qualify for Rule 20A credits but would have to fund the entire project cost and forego any current Rule 20A credits the City has for re-allocation to another community. After analysis by staff and getting input from PG&E’s Rule 20A coordinator, staff identified the undergrounding of the utility lines that cross Ramona Garden Park as a project that would qualify for use of Rule 20A credits and would be within the City’s credit amount based on initial cost estimates by PG&E. This project would also align with the City’s goal to rehabilitate Staff Report: Ramona Garden Park Rule 20A Utility Undergrounding District Page 2 February 13, 2024
Ramona Garden Park through the four-phased project (CIP 1259) that is currently in design. The proposed project would also align with prior direction from Council for staff to investigate the possibility of pursuing a Rule 20A project at Ramona Garden Park that would cost less than the City’s Rule 20A credit amount.
Staff prepared a proposed Utility Undergrounding District boundary map for review by PG&E and approval by CPUC staff (Attachment 2). The proposed project would underground the utility lines crossing through the park from Ramona Avenue to Brighton Avenue and, pending credit availability and projected costs, the utility lines running along Ramona Avenue from North 9th Street to North 10th Street (See Attachment 3). The initial cost estimate for this project from PG&E is between $767,397 and $1,534,790. This estimate is preliminary and will be refined after the City adopts a resolution for prioritizing this undergrounding district and PG&E’s design team begins work.
If the overall project estimate exceeds the City’s available credits, PG&E will return to the City to consider an agreement that will require the City to agree to fund the difference between the estimated project cost and the City’s credit amount. The project cost estimate will vary depending on site-specific conditions, construction costs at time of eventual construction, and currently unknown factors that will be revealed and addressed during the design phase of the project. The City is not bound at this time to any cost as a result of passing the proposed resolution. Given the wide range for the ultimate project cost shared by PG&E, staff would return to Council for direction on whether to continue with design efforts if the project cost estimate from PG&E exceeds the City’s credit amount to ensure that anticipated costs to the City are understood and budgeted for.
Pending adoption of the Ramona Garden Park Utility Undergrounding District resolution, staff will work with PG&E to formally qualify the City as an “active” Rule 20A community and ensure that the City’s credits cannot be re-allocated to another community’s project. PG&E will then begin the design process for the project and coordinate with City staff as new information about the project is available. To ensure coordination between the Ramona Garden Park Rehabilitation Project and this utility undergrounding project, staff will also maintain constant communication with PG&E to ensure that any changes to the park layout are implemented in the undergrounding project design, which will avoid unexpected cost increases to the undergrounding project.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact of adopting this resolution. Once the resolution is adopted and PG&E begins the initial design process, the project cost estimate will continue to be refined to reflect updated construction costs, project scope specifics, and previously unexpected conditions discovered during the design effort. As this cost estimate is refined, PG&E will return to the City to confirm any costs in excess of the City’s available Rule 20A credits and staff would then seek Council direction as to whether to identify City funding for the remaining amount.
The City currently has $816,350 in available Rule 20A credits that would be secured through the adoption of this resolution and the initial project cost estimate from PG&E is between $767,397 to $1,534,790. The passage of this resolution does not obligate the City to agree to pay for any future funding gap at this time. Depending on the ultimate cost to the City, staff would return to Council at a future date to make a recommendation regarding what funding source to allocate for a potential funding gap resulting from an increased project cost estimate.
Staff Report: Ramona Garden Park Rule 20A Utility Undergrounding District Page 3 February 13, 2024
ALTERNATIVES
The Council has the following alternatives to consider:
1. Adopt a Resolution establishing the Ramona Garden Park Utility Undergrounding District and authorize staff to work with Pacific Gas and Electric to pursue a Rule 20A utility undergrounding project at Ramona Garden Park; or
2. Provide alternative direction to staff.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
A Public Hearing Notice was published in the New Times on February 1, 2024. The agenda was posted in accordance with the Brown Act.
Attachments
1. Resolution
2. Proposed Utility Undergrounding District
3. Proposed Utility Lines to be Undergrounded
Attachment 1
RESOLUTION NO. 24-__
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GROVER BEACH, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING THE RAMONA GARDEN PARK UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT WHEREAS, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has authorized electric and telecommunication utilities to convert overhead utility lines and facilities to underground pursuant to Electric Rule 20 and Telecommunication Rule 32; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to certain criteria, CPUC rules allow participating cities and counties to establish legislation authorizing the creation of underground utility districts within which existing overhead electric distribution and telecommunication distribution and service facilities will be converted to underground; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grover Beach, has adopted an ordinance authorizing the City Council to designate areas within which all existing overhead poles, overhead wires and overhead equipment associated with the distribution of electric power, telecommunication services and cable television should be removed and replaced with underground wires and facilities; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works for the City of Grover Beach has consulted with the affected public utilities and such utilities have agreed that the proposed underground conversion district, designated the Ramona Garden Park Underground Utility District and more particularly described in Exhibit 1 attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, meets the criteria established by the rules of the CPUC, to wit, That such undergrounding will avoid or eliminate an unusually heavy concentration of overhead electric facilities; and
That the street or road or right-of-way adjoins or passes through a civic area or public recreation area or an area of unusual scenic interest to the general public; and WHEREAS, each year the City of Grover Beach is notified by PG&E regarding the allocation of work credits for conversion of overhead electric distribution lines and facilities to underground, known as Rule 20A allocations; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grover Beach and the affected utilities have agreed by letter that each utility shall complete the engineering of their respective portion of the Ramona Garden Park Overhead to Underground Utility Conversion Project; and WHEREAS, the City of Grover Beach and the affected utilities have agreed by letter that Pacific Gas and Electric shall be responsible for preparation of the trench profile and composite drawings and that Pacific Gas and Electric shall be designated as “trench lead” to manage trenching, installation of substructures, and pavement restoration and such other work; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works of the City of Grover Beach and the affected utilities have agreed on a work schedule which meets their respective capabilities and further agreed to waive any administrative fees, costs or special street restoration requirements for purposes of this project; and
Resolution No. 24-__ Page 2
WHEREAS, to the extent required, the City of Grover Beach has agreed to provide easements or rights of way on private property as may be necessary for installation of utility facilities in a form satisfactory to the affected utilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grover Beach has now received the report from the Director of Public Works recommending that the area identified in Exhibit 1 should be designated as an underground utility district within which all existing overhead poles, overhead wires and overhead equipment associated with the distribution of electric power, telecommunication services and cable television should be removed and replaced with underground wires and facilities; and
WHEREAS, upon the recommendation of the Director of Public Works, the City Council of the City of Grover Beach has determined that the proposed Ramona Garden Park Underground Utility District is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act; and
WHEREAS, the City of Grover Beach has notified all affected property owners within the proposed Ramona Garden Park Underground Utility District and inviting same to attend a public hearing to discuss formation of the proposed district; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Grover Beah held public hearings at which time the Council did receive and consider the recommendation of the City Engineer and did hear any and all objections or protests that were raised by the owners of property within the above described district pertaining to designating this area an underground utility district; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by The City Council of the City of Grover Beach that:
Section 1. The public interest requires the removal of all existing utility poles [excepting those poles supporting streetlights, traffic signals or trolley lines], overhead wires and associated overhead structures and installation of underground wires and facilities for supplying electric power, communication, or similar associated services within the areas as shown in Exhibit 1, attached hereto, with such area being designated as the Ramona Garden Park Underground Utility District; and
Section 2, That the utility companies, cable television services and other affected services shall commence work on installation of underground facility installation in Ramona Garden Park Underground Utility District and that as each phase of the project is complete and ready for conversion from overhead to underground utility facilities, all fronting property owners shall be notified by first class letter, postage pre-paid, of the schedule for conversion of all utility service lines; and
Section 3, The electric utility shall use the underground conversion allocation computed pursuant to decisions of the California Public Utilities Commission for the purpose of providing to each premises requiring it in Ramona Garden Park Underground Utility District a maximum of one hundred feet of individual electric service trenching and conductor (as well as backfill, paving and conduit, if required) and each other serving utility shall provide service trenching and conductor in accordance with its rules and tariffs on file with the California Public Utilities Commission or as required by its Franchise Agreement with the City of Grover Beach; and Resolution No. 24-__ Page 3
Section 4. The electric utility shall use said underground conversion allowance allocation, up to a maximum amount of $1500 per service entrance excluding permit fees, for the conversion of electric service panels to accept underground service in the Ramona Garden Park Underground Utility District, and the City of Grover Beach shall be financially responsible for any and all costs not covered by the electric utility for the installation and maintenance of the conduit and termination box located on, under or within any structure on the premises served; and Section 5. That upon notification as specified in Section 2, all property owners in Ramona Garden Park Underground Utility District shall have underground electrical entrance facilities installed and inspected pursuant to the City of Grover Beach Electrical Code within sixty (60) days and that should any property owner fail to install satisfactory underground electrical entrance facilities by the date specified in the notice, the electric utility shall notify the Director of Public Works who shall, within thirty (30) days direct the electric utility in writing to discontinue electrical service to the property, without recourse, pursuant to Rule 11 until electrical entrance facilities are ready to accept underground electrical conductors and have passed the necessary inspection requirements; and
Section 6. That once all services have been converted from overhead to underground, the utility companies, cable television services and other affected services shall remove all poles (except as specified above) and associated overhead facilities in Ramona Garden Park Underground Utility District.
On motion by Council Member __________, seconded by Council Member ________, and on the following roll-call vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members –
NOES: Council Members –
ABSENT: Council Members –
ABSTAIN: Council Members –
RECUSED: Council Members –
the foregoing Resolution was PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grover Beach, California this 13th day of February 2024.
KAREN BRIGHT, MAYOR
Attest:
WENDI B. SIMS, CITY CLERK
**DRAFT**
- District Boundary
0 50'
Attachment 2
Attachment 3
Ramona Garden Park – Existing Overhead Utility Lines to be undergrounded Utility Lines to be
Undergrounded (1 of 2)
Utility Lines to be
Undergrounded (2 of 2)
Agenda Item No. 7
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council DATE: February 13, 2024 FROM: Matthew Bronson, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Steve Kahn, Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Gabriel Munoz-Morris, Senior Engineer
SUBJECT: Second Reading and Adoption of an Ordinance Repealing and Replacing Chapter 1 (Sanitary Sewer System) of Article VII (Public Works) of the Grover Beach Municipal Code
RECOMMENDATION
Conduct a public hearing and second reading, by title only, and adopt an Ordinance repealing and replacing Chapter 1 (Sanitary Sewer System) of Article VII (Public Works) of the Grover Beach Municipal Code to update the City’s Sewer Ordinance.
BACKGROUND
The City’s current Sewer Ordinance was originally adopted in 1965 in conjunction with the establishment of the City’s original Sewer Assessment District No. 1 (District) that constructed most of the City’s sewer system. The District did not include any land south of Farroll Road as most of that land was privately owned at that time and had not yet been subdivided and developed.
Assessment District No. 1, along with Ordinance 72, sought to standardize requirements for sewer collection in the City and established a timeline for properties to connect to the City’s sewer collection system. Ordinance 72 also established regulations on the character of waste that could be discharged to the sewer collection system and were generally consistent with regulations adopted by the South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD) that operates the sewage treatment plant where sewer from Grover Beach is treated. Since its adoption in 1965, Ordinance 72 has been amended several times to ensure the City’s compliance with new regulations and requirements from SSLOCSD, and to regulate new additions and extensions of the City’s sewer collection system.
Between 2009 and 2020, the City made significant investments to construct sewer mains in the industrial areas south of Farroll Road that resulted in construction of 7,100 linear feet of new sewer main at a cost of $1.8 million. These investments were made to modernize and expand the City’s sewer infrastructure and reduce the risk of groundwater contamination from septic systems.
However, few properties in this area have connected to the new sewer system and most properties are treating their own wastewater with private septic tank and leach field systems. Most of these private systems were constructed prior to the adoption of the State Water Resources Control Board’s Policy for Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems and their condition and maintenance history is largely unknown. Standards for private treatment systems were far less stringent at the time these systems were constructed and there is greater potential for groundwater contamination now given the age and unknown condition and history of these systems. In a 1962 Investigation of Nitrates in Ground Water in the Grover Beach area (Attachment 6), the California Department of Water Resources highlighted percolation of domestic sewage as of one two major sources of groundwater impairment for the local groundwater. This Staff Report: Second Reading and Adoption of Updated Sewer Ordinance Page 2 February 13, 2024
conclusion has been further confirmed through monitoring Nitrate levels in extracted groundwater through the City’s production wells over the last 60 years. This is a defined constituent element of potential groundwater contamination that the City considers a public health and safety issue.
Staff previously brought a proposed update to the existing Sewer Ordinance to the Council for first reading an introduction on May 8, 2023 and the Council held a public hearing on May 22, 2023. At the hearing, Council considered public comment in opposition to the update and asked that staff review issues presented before modifying the proposed ordinance for adoption. Based on public comment and Council direction, staff subsequently modified the proposed ordinance update to allow for more time to connect to sewer after passage of the updated ordinance, clarify the need for property owners to continue to maintain their existing septic systems properly until time of connection to the sewer system, and clarify exemptions for residential properties that would have to install lift stations to connect to the sewer system. The Council held a policy discussion on the ordinance changes on July 24, 2023 and provided direction to staff to return to Council for adoption of the ordinance without further changes. Council conducted a first reading of the proposed ordinance on January 8, 2024 with a second reading and public hearing scheduled for February 13, 2024.
Proposed Ordinance Updates-Time to Connect
Based on Council direction, this proposed update to the City’s sewer regulations would replace Ordinance 72 and incorporate the language from several other related ordinances and amendments into a single new ordinance. The City’s Master Fee Schedule would be included by reference instead of having fees included directly in the ordinance and the SSLOCSD regulations regarding character of waste would be adopted by reference. These changes allow fees and sewer discharge regulations to be updated without requiring additional updates to the sewer ordinance as frequently going forward.
The only regulatory change proposed with this new ordinance is to establish a citywide requirement for connection to the City sewer system, with some exceptions discussed below, and to remove all references to Sewer Assessment District No. 1. Requiring this connection is consistent with Council direction at the July 24, 2023 meeting. At that meeting, staff recommended establishing a two-year time period for all properties in Grover Beach to connect to City sewer when a property is located within 200 feet of a City sewer line. Since the meeting, several property owners have proactively sought to connect to City sewer rather than wait for an ordinance update with this requirement, and more continue to apply citing interest in connecting after discovering, due to the City’s workshop and notifications, that their property already had a lateral in the street to their property line.
As a result, staff now recommends modifying the two-year connection requirement to a three-year connection requirement in recognition that some property owners have expressed interest in connecting but have requested a slightly longer timeline to budget for the cost of doing so. It is estimated that 130 properties would be affected by this requirement that are currently not connected to sewer. These three-year grace periods and distance to sewer requirements are consistent with the original requirements in Ordinance 72 which helps ensure continuity between current and past development requirements as the City establishes uniform requirements for the sewer system citywide. The proposed ordinance also retains the ability for the Council to grant time extensions where special circumstances exist such as an extreme hardship.
Staff Report: Second Reading and Adoption of Updated Sewer Ordinance Page 3 February 13, 2024
Regional Water Quality Control Board Requirements
Throughout the process of drafting the ordinance update, staff have met with Regional Water Quality Control Board staff to discuss current and upcoming regulations as they relate to septic systems. The State Water Resources Control Board is in the process of updating its Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) Policy which is enforced by the Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) and governs the siting, design, operation, and maintenance of OWTS.
The OWTS Policy establishes various tiers for OWTS and designates all existing OWTS as Tier 0 until they begin to fail. If an existing OWTS begins to fail it is automatically reclassified as a Tier 4 (OWTS Requiring Corrective Action) and must be immediately repaired to the standards applicable to a Tier 1 (Low-Risk New or Replacement OWTS). The standards required to repair or replace an existing OWTS to Tier 1 status would make the repair or replacement of most of the existing septic systems in Grover Beach impossible. Systems within 200 feet of City sewer would be required to connect per the California Plumbing Code while systems on properties more than 200 feet from City sewer would see elevated design and construction costs to meet various design requirements included in the OWTS Policy. RWQCB staff indicated that the OWTS policy has been drafted in a way that will ultimately result in the conversion of properties on septic to sewer in urbanized, higher-density jurisdictions like Grover Beach as those systems reach the end of their design life.
Table 1 in Section 7.8 of the OWTS Policy establishes requirements for allowable density per subdivision under Tier 1. For Grover Beach, the highest allowable density would be 2 acres per single family dwelling unit which is a much lower density than that of properties with existing septic systems. Section 8 of the OWTS establishes minimum design and construction standards for OWTS. This section establishes minimum depths to groundwater from the bottom of the OWTS dispersal system. For Grover Beach, a minimum depth of 5-8 feet would be typical which is very difficult to comply with in the industrial area where most of the remaining septic systems are.
Recent data from monitoring wells in the industrial area show that groundwater is located between
6.5 and 8.5 feet below ground surface which is almost entirely above this minimum depth to groundwater when factoring required cover above the dispersal system and the height of the system itself.
This section of the OWTS also establishes the requirement for all new onsite systems to have a replacement area equal to 100% of the system’s size set aside and available for future use which would severely limit usable space on any property proposing a new system. Dispersal systems and replacement areas are not permitted to be covered by an impermeable surface such as asphalt, concrete, or buildings. However, most of the properties in the City’s industrial area are nearly, if not completely, covered in impermeable materials meaning that all replacement or new OWTS would require removal of existing impermeable materials. There are additional standards in Section 8 of the OWTS Policy that govern the design and construction of new or replacement systems, but the points listed above would effectively make replacement of an existing system far more costly than connection to the City’s sewer system in instances where connection to the sewer system is available.
Costs of Connection
Property owners connecting to the City sewer would be required to pay sewer impact fees and the cost to construct their connection and abandon their septic tank system. Due to the varying nature of each property and the ability of each property owner to request various quotes from contractors, staff cannot provide an exact estimate for the total cost of connection to City sewer.
However, based on recent connection projects, research into construction costs, and conversations with various contractors offering these services, staff estimates the average cost Staff Report: Second Reading and Adoption of Updated Sewer Ordinance Page 4 February 13, 2024
should generally be $15,000 to $20,000 for one property. This amount includes permits and impact fees paid at time of connection. For residential properties, the impact fees including both City and SSLOCSD impact fees range from approximately $4,100 to $5,100 depending on the size of their water meter. For commercial and industrial properties, the impact fees including both City impact fees and SSLOCSD impact fees range from approximately $5,300 to $8,900 depending on the size of their water meter. Most of these impact fees are SSLOCSD fees which are subject to change. The remaining costs include City permit fees (which are typically $1,000 or less) and construction costs which comprise the bulk of the $15,000-20,000 average cost estimate per property. It would be each property owner’s responsibility to hire their own contractor to perform the septic tank abandonment and sewer connection work. Attachment 4 includes a breakdown of the expected costs to connect for a residential property with a ¾" water meter.
Residential Connection Exemptions
Most of the remaining properties not connected to the City’s sewer system are industrial and/or commercial properties, but some residential properties remain on septic as well. For residential properties, it is important to note that Sections 713.0 through 713.7 of the California Plumbing Code (Plumbing Code) establishes that no permit shall be issued for the installation, alteration, or repair of a private sewage disposal system, or part thereof, on a lot for which a connection with a public sewer is available. Within the Plumbing Code, availability of a public sewer system is defined as a sewer main located within 200 feet from the point of connection. An exemption to the connection requirement in the Plumbing Code is provided for single-family residential properties with a properly functioning septic system when the connection to the City sewer cannot be accomplished via a gravity-fed connection.
The proposed ordinance consequently includes language referencing the Plumbing Code requirements to connect to City sewer and details the exemption for single-family residential properties within 200 feet of City sewer that could not establish a gravity-fed sewer connection.
The exemption would be in effect until an alternate connection point became available that would allow for a gravity-fed connection. This exemption would eliminate a potentially increased cost of connection for single-family residential property owners that are within 200 feet of City sewer but would need to install a sewage pumping station to connect to City sewer. The Plumbing Code limits this exemption to single-family residential properties, and due to state preemption, the City cannot expand this exemption to multi-family residential properties. There are currently no multifamily properties with septic systems that have City sewer available so this exemption is not necessary in the updated sewer ordinance. Commercial and industrial properties are excluded from this exemption in the Plumbing Code, but staff believes that all commercial and industrial properties in the City currently on septic and within 200 feet of a City sewer could establish a gravity-fed connection to City sewer.
Septic to Sewer Grant Funding
Through coordination with the RWQCB, staff expressed the City’s interest in finding ways to reduce the financial burden of sewer connection for property owners experiencing financial hardships. RWQCB staff indicated that there is funding in the State Revolving Fund (SRF) available for septic-to-sewer conversion projects for lower income areas. The City does not qualify for this funding as a whole, but specific sub-areas can be studied to determine if the median household income (MHI) in that area qualifies the area for grant funding.
Staff discussed each of the residential areas that are not currently connected to City sewer with RWQCB staff to determine if they would likely qualify for grant funding. RWQCB staff indicated that the area near Rose Court would be unlikely to qualify as well as the properties in the northern Staff Report: Second Reading and Adoption of Updated Sewer Ordinance Page 5 February 13, 2024
portion of the city. However, the residential portion of the industrial area was highlighted by RWQCB staff as an area with a strong possibility of qualifying for grant funding. This area has traditionally had a lower MHI and has a high concentration of residential properties that are not currently connected to City sewer. In addition, there are two clusters of residential properties along Farroll Road that could potentially be connected to City sewer through a grant funded project.
These areas are depicted in Attachment 5.
To confirm eligibility, the City would have to fund an income survey to confirm MHI in these areas is consistent with grant funding requirements. The estimated cost of this income survey is $10,000 but that cost would be reimbursed to the City if the areas qualified for a grant funded project. The grant funds have no local match requirement currently and allow for an award of up to $125,000 per connected property. This funding would cover needed sewer main extensions, construction of sewer laterals for each property, abandonment of existing septic systems, connection of onsite piping to the new sewer lateral, and payment of impact fees associated with connection to City sewer. This would effectively allow for connection of these residential properties at little to no cost to the property owners.
RWQCB staff have indicated that this grant funded project would likely take between 5-6 years from date of the income survey to completion of construction. The residential properties affected by this would be exempted from connection under the new ordinance because there is not currently a sewer main within 200-feet of their connection point. If this area is determined to be eligible, the grant funding would allow for the connection of approximately 26 residential properties at no cost to the City or the property owners while allowing the City to pursue sewer main extension projects in other areas to achieve connections where not currently possible. Per Council’s direction on January 8, staff has requested a $10,000 mid-year Budget Adjustment Request to fund an income survey of a targeted area (Attachment 5). This income survey is required to pursue grant funding for a sewer extension project in this area.
Conclusion
Pending Council adoption of the ordinance, staff will work to contact all properties that currently have City sewer available and inform them of the requirement to connect to City sewer within three years of adoption. Staff anticipates that most of these notices will be sent to properties in the industrial area which is defined as the area bounded by South 4th Street to the west, Farroll Road to the north, South 13th Street to the east, and the City’s southern jurisdictional boundary to the south. In the future if additional sewer main projects are planned, staff would contact affected property owners and advise them of the proposed project and connection requirements. At the July 24th meeting, Council provided direction to staff to finalize a Sewer Connection/Septic Tank Abandonment FAQ/Fact Sheet for property owners to reference if they had questions about the process. The document is finalized, and staff will post it on the City’s webpage when the new sewer ordinance is adopted. If adopted, the ordinance would take effect on March 13, 2024.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no City fiscal impact associated with this action. After connection of properties to City sewer, the City would receive Sewer Development Impact Fees and monthly sewer use payments as established by the Master Fee Schedule. However, this additional revenue would not be a substantial increase in Wastewater Enterprise Fund revenue and would come over time as properties connect to sewer in accordance with the connection timeframe established in the ordinance.
Staff Report: Second Reading and Adoption of Updated Sewer Ordinance Page 6 February 13, 2024
ALTERNATIVES
The Council has the following alternatives to consider:
1. Conduct a public hearing and second reading, by title only, and adopt an Ordinance to repeal and replace Chapter 1 (Sanitary Sewer System) of Article VII (Public Works) of the Grover Beach Municipal Code; or,
2. Provide staff with alternate direction.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
A Public Hearing Notice was published in the New Times on February 1, 2024.The agenda was posted in accordance with the Brown Act. Property owners affected by the adoption of the proposed ordinance were notified in advance of this public hearing.
Attachments
1. Ordinance No. 24-
2. Sewer-Septic Conversion FAQ/Fact Sheet
3. Map of Properties Currently on Septic
4. Septic to Sewer Cost Breakdown
5. Possible Grant Funded Project Areas
6. 1962 Investigation of Nitrates in Ground Water Report Attachment 1
ORDINANCE NO. 24-__
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GROVER BEACH, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING CHAPTER 1 OF ARTICLE VII AND ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER 1, ARTICLE VII OF THE GROVER BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, the City of Grover Beach is a General Law city organized pursuant to Article XI of the California Constitution; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted the City by Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, the City has the police power to adopt regulations designed to promote the public convenience or the general prosperity, as well as regulations designed to promote the public health, morals or public safety; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GROVER BEACH AS FOLLOWS:
PART 1. Chapter 1 of Article VII of the Grover Beach Municipal Code is hereby repealed in total:
PART 2. Chapter 1 of Article VII or the Grover Beach Municipal Code is hereby added as follows:
CHAPTER 1 - SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
PART 1 - GENERAL PROVISIONS
Sec. 7100. Enabling Authority. This chapter is adopted pursuant to authority granted by Government Code Section 38900 that a city legislative body may construct, establish, and maintain drains and sewers.
The following Municipal Code sections shall remain in full force and effect except that all references language specific to fee amounts shall be repealed and replaced with “as set forth in the Master Fee Schedule as amended from time to time”:
Article II, Chapter 3, Section 2302
Article 111, Chapter 1, Section 3141
Article 111, Chapter 1, Section 3405 (A) & (E)
Article 111, Chapter 1, Section 3903
Article 111, Chapter 1, Section 3908
Article 111, Chapter 1, Section 3915
Article 111, Chapter 11, Section 3976
Article Ill, Chapter 11, Section 3979
Article 111, Chapter 12, Section 3990
Ordinance No. 24-__ Page 2
Article V, Chapter 2, Section 5203
Article V, Chapter 2, Section 5219
Article V, Chapter 2, Section 5220
Article V, Chapter 4, Section 5413 (B) & (H)
Article VII, Chapter 1, Section 7156
Article VII, Chapter 1, Section 7180 (A) - (N)
Article VII, Chapter 1, Section 7182
Article VII, Chapter 1, Section 7185
Article VII, Chapter 1, Section 7190
Article VII, Chapter 2, Section 7233
Article VIII, Chapter 2, Section 8202
Article VIII, Chapter 2, Section 8204
Article VIII, Chapter 2, Section 8205
Sec. 7111. Application. This chapter shall apply to all sewer facilities of the City of Grover Beach, including but not limited to, building sewers, sewer laterals, and sewer mains as defined in Part
2. PART 2 - DEFINITIONS
Sec. 7120. Definitions. (A) For the purpose of this chapter, unless it is plainly evident from the context that a different meaning is intended, the following terms used herein are defined as follows:
(1) Back-water Valve or Backflow Prevention Device: A device whose purpose is to prevent flow in a sewer in a direction opposite to that of the intended drainage; (2) Council: The City Council of the City of Grover Beach. (3) Building: Any structure used for human habitation, or a place of business, recreation, or other activity and containing sanitary facilities;
(4) Building Sewer: That portion of any sewer beginning at the plumbing or drainage outlet of any building, industrial facility, or preliminary treatment facility, and ending at the property line;
(5) Cesspool or Seepage Pit: An excavation in the ground which receives the discharge from a sewer for the purpose of allowing said discharge to percolate into the ground; (6) City: The City of Grover Beach, State of California; (7) City Engineer: Registered Civil Engineer appointed by the City Council of the City of Grover Beach to perform regular and/or special engineering services; (8) City's Representative: Any person legally authorized by the Council of the City of Grover Beach to represent the City in matters relating to the City’s sewer system; (9) Cleanout: A branch fitting installed in a sewer or other pipe for the purpose of providing access for cleaning;
Ordinance No. 24-__ Page 3
(10) County: County of San Luis Obispo, State of California; (11) Crown: The highest point of the inside surface of a sewer cross-section; (12) District, Sanitation District, or SSLOCSD: The South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District;
(13) District’s Representative: Any person legally authorized by the Board of Directors of the South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District to represent the District; (14) Engineering Standards and Specifications: The current edition of the Engineering Standards and Specifications of the City of Grover Beach. (15) Fixture: Any sink, tub, shower, toilet, or other facility connected by drain to the sewer:
(16) Garbage: Solid wastes from the preparation, cooking, and dispensing of food and from the handling, storage and sale of agricultural products; (17) Lot: Any piece or parcel of land, bounded, defined, or shown upon a plot or deed recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Luis Obispo County, provided, however, that in the event any structure is located upon more than one parcel of land all under one ownership and as herein defined, the term "lot" shall include all such parcels of land. For purposes of land which is to be annexed to or served by the City, the term "lot" shall be defined as (1) a minimum size parcel or parcels into which said land can be subdivided or split as permitted by the local zoning regulations, or (2) the actual number of parcels into which said land is subdivided or split as evidenced by records filed with the County Recorder;
(18) Manhole: A structure for the purpose of providing access to a buried sewer; (19) Permit: Any written authorization required pursuant to this chapter; (20) Person: Any human being, individual, firm, company, partnership, association, corporation, government or agency;
(21) Privy: An excavation in the ground receiving or intended to receive human body wastes; (22) Public Sewer: That portion of a sewer lying within a public right-of-way or easement, including lateral sewers that are publicly maintained and sewer mains owned and maintained by, and subject to the jurisdiction of, the City; (23) pH. The logarithm of the reciprocal of the weight of hydrogen ions in grams per liter of solution;
(24) Septic Tank: A structure for treating sewage before disposal in a seepage pit or other leaching system;
(25) Sewage: Any water or fluid-carried wastes from residences, business buildings, public buildings, institutions, and industrial facilities;
(26) Sewage Works or Sewerage: All facilities for collecting, pumping, treating, and disposing of sewage;
(27) Sewer: A pipe or conduit for carrying sewage;
(28) Sewer Lateral: The portion of a sewer lying within a public right-of-way or easement and connecting a building sewer to a sewer main. Unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer or publicly maintained, sewer laterals are privately owned and maintained, including the cut-in or wye connection to the sewer main ; (29) Sewer Main: Those sewers, excluding sewer laterals, whose main purpose is to accept sewerage from laterals and convey it to the treatment plant; (30) Shall and May: Shall is mandatory; may is permissive; (31) Trunk Sewer: The same as sewer main.
Ordinance No. 24-__ Page 4
PART 3 - HOUSE SEWERS
GENERAL REGULATIONS AND MATERIALS
Sec. 7130. Separate Connection for Each Building. Every building in which plumbing fixtures are installed shall be separately and independently connected with the public sewer except as provided herein.
Sec. 7131. Exception; Dwelling in Rear. Where a dwelling is on the rear of a lot, on the front of which is another building and the total street frontage of the said lot does not exceed sixty (60) feet, and is under one ownership, a separate sewer connection will not be required.
Sec. 7132. Exception; Accessory Dwelling Unit. Where an accessory dwelling unit is located on a lot on which there is also a primary residence, and is under one ownership, a separate sewer connection will not be required.
Sec. 7133. Exception; Appurtenant Buildings. Service buildings, such as a garage, servants' quarter, powerhouse, or other like buildings where required as an adjunct to and to be used in connection with a residence, public building, or commercial plant, may be connected to the house sewer serving the main building.
Sec. 7134. Materials. Building sewer lines may be of any materials allowed by the California Plumbing Code currently in effect and approved by the Building Inspector. Conformance with ASTM standards for the materials used shall apply.
Sec. 7135. Building Sewers; Size and Specifications. House sewers shall be not less than four (4) inches in diameter and shall have a continuous and even fall of not less than one-quarter (1/4) of an inch to the foot, except where solid rock or other unusual condition is encountered, then, with the approval of the City Engineer, the requirements for an even grade may be altered to best suit the given condition and to provide the best fall available under the circumstances.
Sec. 7135.1. Building Sewers; Backflow Prevention Devices. Building sewers must be constructed in accordance to the requirements of the California Plumbing Code with regard to backflow prevention devices. The installation of the backflow prevention device shall be at the sole cost and expense of the property owner and maintenance of the device shall be the sole obligation of the property owner or the owner’s successor in interest.
Sec. 7136. Protection of Sewer Laterals Where Substandard Depth. That portion of the sewer lateral from the curb line to the property line which has less than three (3) feet of cover between the top of the pipe and the curb or the top of the ground shall be protected as required by the City Engineer.
Sec. 7137. Old Building Sewers and Sewer Laterals, Use of. Old building sewers and sewer laterals may be used in connection with new plumbing work when, upon examination, they are found to conform to the requirements governing new building sewers and new sewer laterals as provided in this ordinance. Examination of the existing sewer lateral shall be completed prior to issuance of any permit resulting in re-use of the lateral.
Sec. 7138. Permits; When Required. A permit will not be required for the purposes of removing stoppages or performing repairs in any building sewer. Use of the public right-of-Way to repair a sewer lateral shall require an approved Encroachment Permit from the Department of Public Works of the City of Grover Beach
Ordinance No. 24-__ Page 5
Sec. 7139. Building Courts; Common Pipe. Building sewers from a building court (serving four units or more) may be connected to a sewer main through a common pipe and sewer lateral, provided that such common pipe and sewer lateral be of adequate size, as determined by the City Engineer, but must be at least 6 inches in diameter. The common pipe and sewer lateral shall be run in as direct a line to the sewer main as possible and a manhole shall be provided at its junction with the existing sewer main. A riser of the requirements and specifications of the City shall be placed within two and one-half (2-1/2) feet of the point of connection of the house sewer located the farthest from the public sewer. Such building sewers connecting to the common pipe shall be laid under the same requirements as if they were to connect directly to a sewer main.
Sec. 7140. New Septic Tanks, Etc.; Repairs to Old. Where a public sewer is located within a distance of two hundred (200) feet (measured along streets, alleys, avenues, or public rights-ofway upon which the property abuts), from point of connection, no new or replacement septic tank or leach line, leach field or sewer wells shall be constructed. Said properties shall connect to the public sewer and the existing septic tank or well shall be abandoned and removed or filled to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Community Development Director. An exemption, per the California Plumbing Code, shall be made for single-family residential properties where a public sewer is located within two-hundred feet but connection to the public sewer cannot be accomplished via a gravity-fed connection. This exemption shall extend until an alternative point of connection to the public sewer becomes available that allows for a gravity-fed connection. All property owners whose property is currently serviced by a septic tank or sewer well shall take every action necessary to ensure the continued proper functioning of the existing system, regardless of the proximity of a public sewer, and provide for inspections by The Public Works Director, or their designee, upon written request.
Sec. 7140.1 Grease Traps, Catch Basins, Sumps, Etc. To prevent sand, grease, soil or other objectionable matter entering the sewerage system, restaurants and public places serving food shall be provided with grease traps, and public and private garage floor drains and public wash racks shall be provided with catch basins or sumps of a design approved by the City Engineer and in conformance with the California Plumbing Code. Garage and oiling pits shall not be connected to any sewerage system.
Sec. 7141. Time for Connection to Sewerage System. Where a public sewer is located within a distance of two hundred (200) feet (measured along streets, alleys, avenues, or public Right-ofWays upon which the property abuts) and except as otherwise provided in this Chapter, every building now or hereafter situated within the City of Grover Beach in which plumbing fixtures are now or hereafter installed shall be separately and independently connected to the city sewerage system by the property owner within three years of adoption of this Ordinance by the City Council.
Said property owners shall make application for the sewer connection pursuant to Section 7157.
All buildings within the City of Grover Beach which are required by this section to be connected to the city sewerage collection system shall be subject to monthly sewer fees commencing on the date of connection to the sewerage collection system. Upon completion of the required connection to the city sewerage system, any existing septic tank or well shall be abandoned and removed or filled, according to the direction of and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Community Development Director. Upon written application by the property owner, and on a showing of good cause therefore, the City Council may grant an extension of time to connect a building to the city sewerage collection system of up to two additional years. Such extension of time may be granted only upon condition that the applicant pay monthly payments toward the required sewer impact Ordinance No. 24-__ Page 6
fee amount divided into equal installments equivalent to the number of months extension granted by the Council. Failure to comply with any of the provisions of this section shall be deemed to be a misdemeanor.
Sec. 7141.1. Public Nuisance. Notwithstanding any other provisions of the City of Grover Beach Municipal Code, noncompliance with either Section 7140 or 7141 or the further maintenance or use of cesspools, septic tanks, or other means of sewage disposal in the City of Grover Beach inconsistent with the requirements of this Chapter, by any person, except as permitted pursuant to this Chapter, is a public nuisance. The occupancy of any building from which sewage is discharged in violation of this Chapter is a public nuisance, and an action may be brought to enjoin any person from occupying any such building.
PART 4 - GENERAL RULES
Sec. 7150. Engineering Standards and Specifications. The City may, by resolution, update its Engineering Standards and Specifications for the construction of sewerage works, and such standards and specifications, when adopted, shall become part of this ordinance.
Sec. 7151. Private Sewage Systems Unlawful. No person shall connect to, use, provide, or maintain any system for the handling or treating of sewage or other liquid wastes within the boundaries of the City that was not in existence and use at the time of adoption of this Ordinance, except as herein provided, or upon authorization given by resolution of the City Council.
Sec. 7152. Protection from Damage. No unauthorized person shall break, damage, deface, uncover, or tamper with any structure, appurtenance, equipment or other property which is a part of the city sewage system. An approved Encroachment Permit shall be required prior to commencement of any work on a sewer lateral, sewer main, or any sewer appurtenances within the public Right-of-Way. No manhole shall be covered or made inaccessible. If required by changes in surface grade made necessary because of property development, and/or subdivisions, manholes shall be reconstructed by the developer and/or subdivider to conform to this requirement.
Sec. 7153. Investigation Powers. City representatives shall carry evidence establishing their position as an authorized representative of the City and, upon presentation and exhibiting these proper credentials and identification, shall be permitted to enter in and upon all buildings and premises within the City for the purposes of inspection, observation, measurement, sampling, testing, or otherwise performing such duties as may be necessary in carrying out the provisions of this chapter. A denial of a City Representative access to a building or premise for purposes of performing such duties, shall be submitted to the City Attorney’s Office for acquisition of a court ordered inspection warrant.
Sec. 7154. Correction of Violation. Any person found to be in violation of any provision of this chapter shall be served by a representative of the City with written notice stating the nature of the violation and providing a reasonable time limit for the correction thereof. Said time limit shall be not less than two (2) or more than seven (7) working days, unless otherwise indicated in this chapter and/or the City Engineer determines otherwise. Such person shall permanently and completely correct the violation within the period allowed.
Ordinance No. 24-__ Page 7
Sec. 7155. Liability for Damages for Violation. Any person violating a provision of this chapter shall be liable for all damages resulting from such violation, or which arise from actions taken in the correction thereof.
Sec. 7156. Relief. Any person who by reason of special circumstances, believes that the application of any portion of this chapter as to them is unjust or inequitable may make written application to the City Council for relief. Said application shall set forth all of the special facts and circumstances and shall request the specific relief or modification desired. The Council, upon receipt of such application and after such investigation as deemed necessary, may take action to grant such relief or modification as it finds necessary. The Council, on its own motion and without an application, may, when special circumstances make the application of this chapter a hardship or unjust or inequitable, modify or suspend such portion of this chapter for the period during which the special circumstances exist. An application for relief under this section shall be in writing and shall be accompanied by a filing fee as set forth in the Master Fee Schedule and amended from time to time.
Sec. 7157. Permit and Fees Required Before Work Done. No sewer connected or to be connected to the City's sewerage system shall be installed, altered, or repaired until the appropriate permits for the work are obtained from the City and all required fees have been paid.
Sec. 7158. Use of Existing Sewer. Before a permit shall be issued for a sewer connection in any areas within the City, for which a property shall use any existing sewerage facilities of the City for which such property shall not have made full payment of its share of the cost thereof, the owner or applicant shall pay to the City a sum of money for such privilege to be computed by the City.
Sec. 7159. Permit Fees. Permit fees for construction, repair, or maintenance of private sewerage works shall be as set forth in the Master Fee Schedule and amended from time to time.
PART 5 - MAIN EXTENSIONS
Sec. 7160. Main Extensions to New Customers. Mains extended to serve new customers shall be subject to all of the provisions of this chapter. No main extension will be made by the City except on an approved dedicated street, alley, area where the City has obtained a recorded easement.
Sec. 7161. Cost of Main Extensions. The cost of main extensions, other than to subdivisions, may be pro-rated against all lots or property that may ultimately be benefited by connection to the sewer system.
Sec. 7162. Main Extensions to Subdivisions. Where sewer main extensions are required for subdivisions, it will be the responsibility of the owner or subdivider to pay the cost for complete installation of all sewer facilities required within the subdivision and for extension of sewer mains from the subdivision to the nearest existing main of adequate capacity for the area to be served.
Such sewer mains and sewer facilities shall be subject to all the requirements of the City. Upon official acceptance by the City, the City shall assume full ownership, maintenance and control of such mains and sewer facilities.
Ordinance No. 24-__ Page 8
PART 6 - STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS FOR QUALITY OF SEWER DISCHARGE Sec. 7170. No Discharge of Storm Waters, Etc. Into Sewers. It is unlawful for any person to discharge or cause to be discharged any storm water, surface water, ground water, roof runoff, subsurface drainage, cooling water or unpolluted industrial process waters into any sanitary sewer, except as is herein specifically provided.
Sec. 7171. Storm Sewers, Etc. Storm water and all unpolluted drainage shall be discharged to such sewers as are specifically designated as storm sewers, or to a natural outlet approved by the City Engineer and in conformance with all applicable state and federal laws. Industrial cooling water or unpolluted process waters may be discharged, upon approval of the City Engineer, to a storm sewer or natural outlet.
Sec. 7172. Pretreatment and Prohibited Waste. Except as hereinafter provided, no person shall discharge or cause to be discharged any waters or wastes into any public sewers that are prohibited by the SSLOCSD Ordinance 1994-1, or any subsequent revision currently in effect.
Sec. 7173. Grease, Oil and Sand Interceptors. Grease, oil and sand interceptors shall be provided when required by the California Plumbing Code, the Southern San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD) Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) Ordinance currently in effect, and when, in the opinion of the City Engineer, they are necessary for the proper handling of liquid wastes containing grease in excessive amounts, or any flammable wastes, sand, or other harmful ingredients; except that such interceptors shall not be required for private living quarters or dwelling units used solely for human habitation. All interceptors shall be of a type and capacity approved by the City Engineer in accordance with the California Plumbing Code and the SSLOCSD FOG Ordinance, and shall be located so as to be readily and easily accessible for cleaning and inspection. Upon change in ownership of the property, change in property use or change in ownership of property use on which an interceptor is installed, the property owner shall coordinate with the City Representative to perform an inspection of the interceptor and ensure it is compliant with current requirements of the California Plumbing Code and the SSLOCSD FOG Ordinance. Any interceptor found to be out of compliance with the requirements of the California Plumbing Code and/or the SSLOCSD FOG Ordinance shall be modified to comply with current requirements at the property owner’s expense. Food Service Establishments (FSEs) are required to enroll in the City’s Fats, Oils, and Grease Control Program and are subject to the regulatory requirements in this chapter and the SSLOCSD FOG Ordinance. Enrollment is the responsibility of the FSE owner and failure to enroll may result in citation.
Sec. 7173.1 Same; Construction. Grease and oil interceptors shall be constructed of impervious materials capable of withstanding abrupt and extreme changes in temperature. They shall be of substantial construction, water-tight, and equipped with easily removable covers which, when bolted in place, shall be gas-tight and water-tight. Grease and oil interceptors shall be constructed in conformance with the requirements of the California Plumbing Code and the SSLOCSD FOG Ordinance.
Sec. 7173.2. Same; Maintenance. Where installed, all grease, oil and sand interceptors shall be maintained by the owner, at their expense, in continuously efficient operation at all times.
Ordinance No. 24-__ Page 9
Sec. 7174. Right to Regulate Water and Wastes and Require Preliminary Treatment, Etc. (A)The admission into the public sewers of any waters or wastes having an average daily flow greater than two (2%) percent of the average daily sewage flow of the City of Grover City, or exceeding the limits established by the SSLOCSD Ordinance 1994-1, or any subsequent revision currently in effect shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer.
(B) Where necessary, in the opinion of the City Engineer, the owner shall provide, at their expense, such preliminary treatment as may be necessary to reduce the nature and constituents of the discharge to comply with Section 7172 or control the quantities and rates of discharge of such waters or wastes.
(C) Plans, specifications, and any other pertinent information relating to proposed preliminary treatment facilities shall be submitted for the approval of the City Engineer and of the Regional Water Quality Control Board of the State of California, and no construction of such facilities shall be commenced until said approvals are obtained in writing.
Sec. 7174.1 FOG Control Program Correction of Violation. Any person, FSE, or property found to be in violation of the requirements of this chapter and/or the SSLOCSD FOG Ordinance shall be served by a representative of the City with written notice stating the nature of the violation and providing a time limit for the correction thereof per the requirements of Section 6 of the SSLOCSD FOG Ordinance.
Sec. 7175. Preliminary Treatment Facilities. Where preliminary treatment facilities are provided for any waters or wastes, they shall be maintained continuously in satisfactory and effective operation, by the owner, at their expense.
Sec. 7176. Installation of Control Manholes. When required by the City Engineer, the owner of any property served by a building sewer carrying industrial wastes shall install a suitable control manhole in the building sewer to facilitate observation, sampling and measurements of the wastes.
Such manhole, when required, shall be accessible and safely located, and shall be constructed in accordance with plans approved by the City Engineer. The manhole shall be installed by the owner at their expense and shall be maintained by the owner so as to be safe and accessible at all times.
Sec. 7177. Measurements, Tests and Analyses. All measurements, tests, and analyses of the characteristics of waters and wastes to which reference is made in Sections 7172 and 7174, shall be determined in accordance with "Standards Methods for the Examination of Water and Sewage," published by American Waterworks Association, and shall be determined at the control manhole provided for in Section 7176, or upon suitable samples taken at said control manhole.
In the event that no special manhole has been required, the control manhole shall be considered to be the nearest downstream manhole in the public sewer to the point at which the building sewer is connected.
Sec. 7178. Special Agreements with Industrial Concerns. No statement contained in this chapter shall be construed as preventing any special agreement or arrangement between the City and any industrial concern whereby an industrial waste of unusual strength or character may be accepted by the City for treatment, subject to payment therefor by the industrial concern.
Ordinance No. 24-__ Page 10
PART 7 - SEWER SERVICE CHARGES
Sec. 7180. Sewer Rental Charge. Every person whose premises in the City are served by a connection to the sewerage collection system of the City, whereby the sewerage or industrial wastes, or both, are disposed of by the City to the South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District sewerage treatment plant, or otherwise, shall pay a sewer rental charge as set forth in the Master Fee Schedule as amended from time to time.
Sec. 7181. Same; Service Outside City. Any connection to the City’s sewerage collection system outside of the City limits shall be charged at double the rate charged within the City, or such other rate as the City Council may determine.
Sec. 7182. Same; Quantity Rates. All users other than single family residences and schools shall be entitled to three thousand (3,000) cubic feet of sewage for the minimum charge. Any excess over the minimum amount shall be charged at the rate as set forth in the Master Fee Schedule and amended from time to time. Such quantities of sewage shall be determined by the City, based upon the percentage of water used which is deposited in said sewer facility. Any occupant who may disagree with the City's determinations may, at the occupant's own expense, install private measuring devices in accordance with specifications approved by the City.
Sec. 7183. Vacancies. In case a residence or place of business becomes vacant, the minimum sewer charge shall be collected.
Sec. 7184. Collections. All charges for such sewage service shall be paid at the same time as water charges are paid to the City and shall be billed upon the same utility bill sent to the user and both amounts must be paid or the City may, in addition to other remedies, shut off the water service.
Sec. 7185. Penalties. Any person failing to pay the sewer service charge when due, and if the water service has been disconnected, shall pay the sum as set forth in the Master Fee Schedule and amended from time to time.
Sec. 7186. Application of Revenue. Revenue derived by the City under the provisions of this chapter shall be used for the operation, acquisition, construction, reconstruction, and maintenance of the sanitary sewer system and shall be applied to the retirement of any bonded indebtedness which was incurred to building the sanitary sewer system.
PART 8 -- SEWER FACILITY FEES
Sec. 7190. Facility Fees. Facility fees shall be charged as set forth in the Master Fee Schedule and amended from time to time.
Sec. 7191. Payment for Connection. The permit for water and sewer connections shall be made at such time as any building permit is issued.
PART 2. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more Ordinance No. 24-__ Page 11
sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared unconstitutional.
PART 3. This Ordinance shall become effective at 12:01 a.m. on the 31st day after the date of its adoption, and within fifteen (15) days after its adoption, it shall be published once, together with the names of the Council Members voting thereon, in a newspaper of general circulation within the City.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council held on January 22, 2024, and PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council on February 13, 2024, on the following roll call vote to wit:
AYES: Council Members –
NOES: Council Members –
ABSENT: Council Members –
ABSTAIN: Council Members –
RECUSED: Council Members –
KAREN BRIGHT, MAYOR
Attest:
WENDI B. SIMS, CITY CLERK
Approved as to Form:
ROB LOMELI, CITY ATTORNEY
C i t y o f G r o v e r B e a c h
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
154 S. 8th Street ❖Grover Beach, CA 93433 ❖ (805) 473-4530 ❖[email protected] Visit our website at www.groverbeach.org
SEPTIC TANK ABANDONMENT – CONNECTION TO CITY SEWER
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS | FACT SHEET
Looking to abandon your septic tank and connect to the City’s wastewater collection system? Please review this form for useful information about this process.
Definitions:
1. Septic Tank, Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS), or Private Sewage Disposal System (PSDS): A privately owned and maintained underground tank in which sewage is collected and allowed to decompose before draining by means of a leaching field.
2. City Sewer, Public Sewer, Wastewater Collection System: The network of publicly owned and maintained sewer main lines throughout the City of Grover Beach that convey wastewater flows to the South Sal Luis Obispo County Sanitation District collection system and treatment plant in Oceano.
3. Sewer Lateral: The privately owned and maintained sewer line that connects a building on private property to the City’s wastewater collection system. Sewer laterals are maintained by the property owner from the City’s mainline to the building they serve. This includes the portion of the lateral located in the public Right-of-Way.
Frequently Asked Questions (and Answers):
Q: Which properties are required to connect to City sewer? A: All properties with a City sewer line within 200-feet (measured from property line) are required to connect to City sewer immediately in accordance with the City’s Sewer Ordinance.
If a property does not currently have a City sewer within 200-feet, they will be required to connect once a City sewer becomes available within 200’.
Q: Are there exemptions for properties within 200-feet of a City sewer? A: Yes, any residential property that currently has a City sewer within 200-feet but would be required to install a private wastewater pump station to connect to the City sewer system is exempted from immediate connection. These residential properties must connect to City sewer when: 1. Their existing septic system fails or 2. An alternative point of connection to the City’s sewer main becomes available that would not require installation of a private wastewater pump station. This exemption does not extend to commercial and/or industrial properties.
Q: My property is on septic, but the septic system has failed. I do not want to connect to City sewer and wish to repair or replace the existing septic system. What do I have to do? A: Any property that must repair or replace the existing septic system must comply with the requirements of the most recent edition of the California Plumbing Code and the State Water Resource Control Board’s OWTS Policy. If the system cannot be repaired or replaced in compliance with those regulations, connection the City sewer will be required.
Q: My property is on septic but there is a sewer line in the street, and I want to connect to it. What permits do I need?
A: You will need a plumbing permit for the septic tank abandonment. If your property does not have a lateral built to the property line, you will also need an encroachment permit for the work Attachment 2
C i t y o f G r o v e r B e a c h
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
154 S. 8th Street ❖Grover Beach, CA 93433 ❖ (805) 473-4530 ❖[email protected] Visit our website at www.groverbeach.org
in the public Right-of-Way. The plumbing permit is issued by the Community Development Department and the encroachment permit is issued by the Public Works Department.
Q: How do I find out if my property has an existing lateral built to my property line or if there is an existing connection at the sewer main that I can use for my connection? A: Contact the Public Works Department at [email protected] or (805) 473-4530 for property-specific information about an available lateral or mainline connection.
Q: What fees do I have to pay to connect to City sewer? A: When pulling your permits, you will be required to pay one-time sewer impact fees. There are two main fees: a City wastewater impact fee and a Sanitation District fee. For a residential property with an existing ¾” water meter, the City impact fee is approximately $1,700 and the Sanitation District fee is approximately $2,500. In addition to impact fees, you will need a plumbing permit issued by the Community Development Department for this work. The fees and permit costs change from time to time, and you are encouraged to contact the Community Development Department for an estimate for your specific property. All City fees can be found in the Master Fee Schedule.
Q: Are there recurring charges that I have to pay once I am connected to City sewer? A: Your bi-monthly utility bill will include sewer charges once you connect to City sewer. These charges depend on several property-specific characteristics but a property with a $100 bimonthly utility bill before City sewer charges typically sees an increase of about $50-60 due to sewer charges. These charges include both City monthly charges and Sanitation District monthly charges. You are encouraged to contact the Utility Billing Department for a more detailed estimate for your property’s monthly sewer charges. All City fees can be found in the Master Fee Schedule.
Q: Do I have to hire my own contractor to abandon my septic system and connect to City Sewer? A: Yes, it is your responsibility as the property owner to hire an appropriately licensed and insured contractor to perform the septic abandonment and sewer connection work for your property. The City does not perform this work for private property owners. The cost of this work varies due to property-specific conditions but is generally up to $15,000.
Q: What City inspections are required for my septic abandonment and sewer connection project? A: The City’s building inspector will inspect the abandonment of the existing septic system and the Public Works inspector will inspect the connection to either the existing lateral or the City’s mainline. Building inspection requests can be called in at (805) 473-4527 and Public Works inspections can be called in at (805) 473-4534 at least 48-hours prior to the requested inspection date/time.
Q: I have additional questions about my septic system and/or connection to City’s sewer. What do I do?
A: Please contact the Public Works Department at [email protected] or (805) 473-4530. Depending on your questions, you may also need to speak with the Community Development Department or Utility Billing Department
Attachment 3
Attachment 4
Attachment 5
..
\.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THE RESOURCES AGENCY OF CALIFORNIA
DE.EA.RIMENT OF WATER RESOURCF.S
INVESTIGATION OF NITRA.TF.S
ll GROUND WATER
GROVER CITY
SAN WIS OBISPO COUNTY
A Report to
Central. Coastal. Re~ Water Pollution Control Board
(No. 3)
(Project No. 4103-054)
April 1962
JH
. .z- ... ,
Attachment 6
#
"
TABLE OF CONTENTS I
I
I
I.
r
~
l OF TRANSMITl'AL . . . . . . . . • . . . • . . . . • . . . . 111·, >WLEDGMENT . • . . . . . . . . . . . • • . . . • • . . . . . iv CZATION . . . . . . • . . . . . . . • . . • . • • . • • • • V :i.., •.
INTRODUCTION . • . . . . . • • . . 1
>rization . . . • . • . • • . . . . • • • . • . • • • . . • . 1 ,e and Scope . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . • . . • • . . . • 2 0f Investigation . • • . • . . . . . . • . . • . • . . • . ~ . 3
;
GROUND WATER GEOLOO Y AND MOVEMENT • • • . • . 4
WATER QUALITY . . • . • . . . . . . 6
FOSSIBLE SOURCES OF NITRATES IN GROUND WATER • . . 7
mta.ry Rocks . . . . . . . • . . • . . . • • . . • • . . . • ., 8 stic Sewage . . . . . . • . . . • • . . . • . • . . . . . . 9 ~izers . . . . . . . • . • • . . • • . . • • • . . . . . • . 10
WATER WELL CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES THAT
MAY ALLEVIATE NITRATE IMPAIRMENT . . • . . . ll:
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS . . . . . . . . . 14
RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . • • • • 14
1 ..
No,
No.
ix
TABLES
SUmmary of Well Construction Practices •••••••••
PIATF.S
Area of Investigation •••••••••••••••••
Geologic Sections A - A' and B - B' ••••••••••
Geologic Sections C - C' and D - D 1 • . . . . . . . .
Lines of Equal Elevation of Ground Water, Spring 1960 •• Nitrate Concentrations in Ground Water, Spring 1961
Nitrate Concentration vs. Time . . . . . . • • . . .
Nitrate Concentration va. Time . . . . . . . . . . . . .
APPENDlXES
J-U,neral Analyses of Surface Waters in the Vicinity
of Grover City
Mineral Analyses of Ground waters iD the Vicinity of
Grover City
Mineral Analyses of Se-.rage .Effluent, Arrcyo Grande
Treatment Plant
ii
~
13 ·-·
• EDMUND G. BROWN
Gov~RNOR :: ~ 908 s . 8ROADWAV , Los ANGELli:5 , CALIF.
TELEPHOHl!h MA 0~4107
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ADDRESS REPLY TO
irpartmrut nf Dltatrr 1Rranurrra P . o. Box 6!598, LOS ANGELES D S , CALIP',
LOS ANGELES
April 30, 1962
ral Coastal Regional water
~uution Control Board (No. 3)
~ Garden Street
Luis Obispo, California
;ention: Mr. Raymond Walsh
Executive Officer
SUbject: Investigation of Nitrates in Ground Water,
Grover City, San Luis Obispo County
ri:;lemen:
Transmitted herewith 1s a report on our studies of the nitrate . _lem in the ground water basin near Grover City, San Luis Obispo County. ~ investigation, authorized under :rnteragency Agreement No. 12--6 and pre-- -d as Project No. 4103-054, included a three-year ground water sampling ram and evaluation of other available hydrologic and geologic data to ~ermine the possible sources ot nitrates and their effects on the local ···nd water supplies.
The study indicates that two major sources of nitrogen are soonsible for the current degradation of the ground water quality, the ication of nitrogenous fertilizers to the agricultural lands overlying _ be.sin, and, to a lesser degree, the percolation of domestic sewage. ~h of these sources co.:r=.ribut~ organic nitrogen in forms other than ·ate or nitrite; however, oxidation and conversion do occur, to subseitly cause ground water impairment.
In view of the fact that these sources of nitrate can be dnated only by placing a considerable economic hardship on the local ea, it 1s recommended that both agricultural and urban users of ground ~er be advised of improved well drilling techniques end well construction ~ards. Compliance with recommended practices shoul.d result in -wtantially reduced nitrate concentrations in the ground water extracted.
Sincerely yours,
/k~ -/'8 _4~~· ~
Herbert A. Howlett, District Engineer
Southern District
iii
: .., ..
ACKNOWLEOOMENT
The Department of water Resources very gratefully acknowledges the le assistance given to it by the various contributing public agencies i:n.vate companies in San LUis Obispo County,; their cooperation has greatly tated the execution ot the investigation.
nu is made of the following:
City of Arroyo Grande Public Works
In this regard, special
E. C. Loomis and Son, Arroyo Grande
Farm Advisor, San Lu.is Obispo County
Farm Advisor, State of California
Grover City Water District
San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District
San Luis Obispo County Health Department
University of California, Davis, California
iv
•..
t
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THE RESOURCES AGENCY OF CALIFORNIA
DEPAR'IME!1T OF ;t'IATER RESOURCES
ErMUND G. BROWN, Governor
ILLIAM E. WARNE, Administrator, The Resources Agency of Cal.1.f'ornia and Director, Department of Water Resources
ALFRED R. GOLZE', Chief Engineer
JOHN R. TEERINK, Assistant -chief Engineer
Southern District
1ert A. Howlett
C. Fowler ••
. . . . . . . .. . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • District Engineer Chief', PJ anning Branch
This re:port was prepared under the direction of
~d B. Willets • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Bead, Water Quality Section by
nell L. Gould ••••••••••••• Senior Engineer, Water Resources ld G. Hansen ••••••••.••••• Senior Engineer, Water Re~ooroes 1 F. Lo Bue •••••••••••••••• Junior Engineering Geologist V
._,
INTRODUCTION
As part of the Department of Water Resources I statewide program water quality monitoring, high concentrations of nitrates were noted in ground water supply utilized in the Grover City area of San Luis 1po County. These concentrations exceed the United States Public 'Vice Dri.Dking Water Standards for nitrates, and were of sufficient dtude to cause concern for the heal.th of the water users. This concern mpted the Central Coastal Regional Water Pollution Control Board to :f\md .nvestigation aimed at a more specific understanding of this critical. :r quality condition. This report presents the results of this study . recommendations for water well construction and sealiIJg practices that tl.d reduce the nitl:a.te concentrations in U1e g.rouncl wt1ters produced in area.
Authorization ~
Section 229 of Division 1 of the California water Code provides eral authorization for the Department of Water Resources to investigate quality of the waters of the state as related to all. sources of .ution, either independently or in cooperation with any person or any .er agency. The regional water pollution control boards under Section i2 of Division 7 of the California Water Code are authorized to request 'F!Stigation of any technical factors involved in water pollution. Starting k958, the Central Coastal Regional Water Pollution Control Board provided .s for this investigation under Project Nos. 58-3-3, 59-3-6, and 3-054.
-1-
:.: .....
FUrpose and Scope
The primary purpose of this investigation was to determine the specific level of concentration of nitrates in the ground waters of the Grover City area, the extent of' the nitrate impairment, and to locate the probable source or sources of nitrates. In addition, reccmnendations were to be f'ormuJ.ated that would al.leviate or remedy the problem of nitrate contamination of the ground water supplies.
To accomplish these purposes, a program of surface water, ground water, and sewage effiuent sampling and analyses was undertaken, together with a limited study of the surface and subsurface geology. The data collected were evaJ.uated to locate the probable sources of nitrates in the ground water and factors a:ffecting ground water impairment.
The sampling program included the collection of samples of the surface waters from the ma.in streams tributary to the study area. In addition to the, department's regularly scheduled ground water monitoring program in the area, water samples frcm selected wells were collected for analysis tvice each year for a period of three years. In all, 30 wells were sampled and 91 mineral analyses of ground water were performed. Two samples were collected of the Arroyo Grande sewage treatment plant e:f'fiuent and analyzed for mineral content. Mineral analyses of the samples of surface water, ground water, and sewage effluent are contained in Appendixes A, B, and c, respectively.
Geologic sections were prepared at selected locations across the study area to illustrate the subsurface physical characteristics of the ground water basin, especially the extent and thickness of sediments -2-
l
r
l
.
;
;
FUrR9se and Scope
The primary purpose of this investigation was to determine the specific level of concentration of nitrates in the ground waters of the Grover City area, the extent of the nitrate impairment, and to locate the probable source or sources of nitrates. In ad.di tion, recommendations were to be formulated that woul.d alleviate or remedy the problem of nitrate contamination of the ground water supplies.
To accomplish these purposes, a program of surface water, ground water, and sewage effluent sampling and analyses was undertaken, together with a limited study of' the surface and subsurface geology. The data collected were evaluated to locate the probable sources of nitrates in the ground water and factors af'fecting ground water impairment.
The sampling program included the collection o:f samples of the surface waters from the main streams tributary to the study area. In addition to the department's regularly schedul.ed ground water monitoring program .in the area, water samples fran selected wells were collected for analysis twice each year for a period of three years. In all., 30 wel.ls were sampled and 91 mineral analyses of ground water were performed. Two samples were collected of the Arroyo Grande sewage treatment plant effiuent and analyzed for mineral content. Mineral ane.J.yses of the samples of surface water, ground water, and sewage effluent are contained in Appendixes A, B, and C, respectivel.y.
Geologic sections were prepared at selected locations across the study area to illustrate the subsurface physical characteristics of" the ground water basin, especially the extent and thickness of sediments -2-
...
.~
I ~ j
I
)
,_
-··-"'
1-J
~ ff
~-
~~ ./P.
-~:··
~
I .
I · comprising the aquifers. Lines of equal elevation of the ground water table or pressure surface were plotted to define the ground water gradient.
Water well construction and sealing techniques as practiced at selected wells in the area were carei\tlly studied to determine if any relationship existed between the methods and materials used 1n well construction and the nitrate concentration in the extracted ground water.
Area of Investigation
Grover City is located in the south coastal portion of San Luis 'Obispo County, about 10 miles south of the City of San Luis Obispo, as. ·shown on Plate 1, "Area of Investigation". The area of' investigation is commonly referred to as the lower Arroyo Grande Valley; besides Grover City, it a.iso includes the communities of Arroyo Grande and Oceano. Its boundaries are r01J8hlY U. s. Bighway 101 on the north, Arroyo Grande Creek I_ on the east a.nd south, and the Pacific Ocean on the west. Within this ' area of about 5,000 acres, about 1,500 acres are devoted to agricul.ture, about 2,500 acres support urban development, and the remainder of the area is essentially undeveloped:.
The lower Arroyo Grande Valley experiences prolOIJged swmner seasons which are generally warm and dry. These are followed by short, mild winters 1n which temperatures rarely drop below freezing. Rainfall averages about 18 inches per year and nearly 95 :percent of this amount falls during the months of October through April. Dense coastal fogs, however, a.re common throughout the year.
The water sup:ply for the agricultural and urban developments in the lower Arroyo Grande Valley is obtained primarily :from underground -3-
I
111 I
1 '
I·
r
I
I
reserves. The ground water supply is replenished by deep percolation of rainfa.11, applied water, and stream flow in the Arroyo Grande and Los Berroa Creeks. The A:rroyo Grande and Los Berroa Creeks make up the two ma.in stream systems which pass through the study area. The Arroyo Grande Creek drains a large area to the north of the study area, while the Los Berroa Creek drains a smaller area to the east. The two streams join about. two and one-hall miles east of their point of discharge into the Pacific Ocean.
GROUND WATER GEOLCGY AND MOVEMENT
The ground water basin which underlies ill of the ]JJwer P,r"!:'oyo Grande Vall.ey and extends uninterrupted southward toward the Santa Maria.
River is known as the Arroyo Grande Basin. From a study of the limited well logs a-va.ilable, it appears that the water-bearing sediments fill the ground water basin to depths of over 200 feet below the ground surface.
Wells in the lower Arroyo Grande Valley extract ground water from the entire depth of sediments. These sediments were deposited in the Recent and Pleistocene periods and contain lithologic units identified as alluvium, 1 • _sand dunes, aud the Paso Robles formation. These elemen~a are Rhrnre on Plates 2A and 2B, "Geologic Sections".
The all.uvium consists of unconsolidated clays, silts, sands, and gravels. The alluvial deposits vary in thickness from a few feet to about 200 feet and are found in channels which were eroded in the older Paso Robles formation. Water-bearing saJ:J.ds and gravels in the alluvium are generally highly lenticular or discontinuous and no delineation of aquifer thickness or areal extent coul.d be made. Most well.a in the alluvium studied in the course of this investigation were found to be perforated in the more permeable strata which varied in thickness from a few feet to about 46 feet. -4-
f
j
I
I I
j
l
!
j
J , i
5 lj
~ 1
i
' r
)l
I
' .1j
~
I~~
rr
l.
~ .. ~~
Recent sand dunes which overlie older sand dunes occur only along a. DB.rl'OW strip of the coast. None of the wells studied penetrated the recent sand dunes.
A major portion of the area of investigation is underlain by the upper Pleistocene sand dunes. Because it is a thin veneer overlying the more productive Pa.so Robles formation, only a few veils tap this upper zone as a source of ground water supply.
The Pleistocene Paso Robles formation which underlies al.l the younger sediments and extends throughout the basin, ranges in thickness fran a few feet to veil over 200 f'eet. This formation, which consists primarily of gravel., sands, silts, and clays., is also highly lenticular, making aquifer correlation difficult. The majority of the ground water extracted in the lower Arroyo Grande Valley is derived from this formation.
There a.re no known geologic structures, such as faul.ts., which affect the movement of' ground water in the lower Arroyo Grande Vall.ey.
Since the sediments comprising the ground water ~~in a.re discontinuous and lenticular, it was not possible to delineate aquifers and it appears that the entire area is one of generally unconfined ground water. Therefore, ground water moves under the influence of gravity 1n the direction of the maximum downward slope of the ground water table.
The ground water table generally follows the slope of the valley floor, that 1s, it slopes in a southwesterly direction. However, because of a large cone of depression in the ground water table created by intensive ground water extractions north of Oceana, the direction of now 1n this immediate area is toward the deepest part of the depression. The shape of the ground water table is illustrated by the ground water contours for the -5-
l
I , I
i
1 i .. l
i
f I . j
i
i
~ ~
,I,'!:
$
ij
i
I I H f ~ t I u , i
1 I
i ~ 1 I
f .~J
i~~ a'\;
, .. "'\~ ,,,...._
,i.~~
.
I-
,.
I
I
'
spring of 1960 on Plate 3, "Lines of Equal EJ.eva.tion of Ground Water, Spring 196011 • The lowest point in this cone of depression in the spring of 1960 was about 30 feet below sea level. Records indicate that this depression existed as early as 1945.
WATER QUALITY
The quality of the surface waters tri buta.ry to the lower Arroyo I Grande Valley is generally acceptable for domestic purposes and irrigation uses under accepted criteria. The total dissolved solids content of the I
I
I
I
surface water varies between 500 and 850 parts per million (ppn) and the waters are generally of a calcium-magnesium bicarbonate character. Mineral ~ses of samples of surface water are contained in AppendiX A, "Mineral Analyses of SUrf'ace Water in the Vicinity of Grover City".
The total dissolved solids content of the ground water in the lower Arroyo Grande Valley varies trom 300 to 1,950 ppn, averaging about 600 ppn. These waters are generall.y of a calcium-magnesium bicarbona.tesulf'ate character. Mineral analyses of ground water samples frcm selected wells in the basin are presented in AppendiX B, "Mineral Analyses of Ground Water in the Vicinity of Grover City". The ground water would be considered generally acceptable for domestic purposes if 1 t were not for the high n1 trate concentration found in many of the wells.
The levels of nitrate concentrations in the surf'ace and ground waters were found to vary videly from each other. For example, analyses of surface water samples collected during the period from the fall ot 1950 to the spring of 1961. indicated either a low level or a complete absence of nitrate. In no case did the nitrate concentration of any surface water -6-
I
I
f
I
I
,,, , . I
r: l ~ i ~ !
1'
~
~
' ;
l
(
I
I
I
I
.sample analyzed exceed 9 ppm. en the other hand, nitrate concentrations in / growid. water samples collected during the same period bad a median value of 67 ppm a.n.d ranged as high as 175 ppm at well 30R2. A graphic illustration of the specific nitrate concentrations in the ground waters, and the well. locations, are show on Plate 4, "Nitrate Concentrations in Ground Water, Sprine; 196111 •
POSSIBLE SOORCES OF NITRATES IN GROUND WATER
The excessive nitrate concentrations in the ground water of the lower Arroyo Grande Valley could originate in the water supply to the basin or f'rom within the basin 1 tself. As previously noted, the sur:face water supply to the area is relatively f'ree of nitrate, indicating that this is not the source of the nitrate impairment. F.a.1nfal1 on the area is relatively free of any mineral content aDd. therefore is not considered a contributor of n1 trate. F1naJ..ly, analyses or samples of ground water in the formations adjacent to the lower Arroyo Grande Val.J.ey area that constitute a source of' subsurface inflow indicate a complete absence of nitrogen or nitrate in this source., thereby e1im1nat1ng it as a potential avenue of nitrate intrusion. 'Ibere:fore, the source of nitrate impairment must be within the lower Arroyo Grande Val1ey.
In the loi,rer Arroyo Grande Valley the possible sources of nitrates in the ground water are the presence of nitrate-bearing sedimentary rocks in the ground water basin; the aevage effluent reacbi.Dg the ground waters from cesspools, septic tanks, leach lines, or the local sewage treatment plant; or the widespread and intensive use of nitrogenous fertilizers on farm land. In eval.uating these possible sources, it was noted tba.t the -7-
:t ,,
: ~-
i ~ .N
/'i
jt:'
J
·£
-~ ·f:
.,.
H
l
i I~ I
,. I
; I
i l i I
I_ ' 1 i 1
,,
~«1
,:
~
Jl•
11 ,.,
,,
t
.. ,.
·;~
,.
1f; ,!~
. ~
i
·,
I.
I
I
I
concentration ot nitrates in the ground waters varied with time. These nuctuations in nitrate concentration in grQUnd water samples fran selected wells are shown on Plates 5A and 5B, "Nitrate Concentration Versus Time".
These nuctuations were observed to correspond with the fluctuations in the elevation of the ground water table caused by rainfall. It appears that there is & correlation between the period ot rainfall and the rise in ground water levels and the increase 1n nitrate concentration, both occurring after ( a time lag of about one year. This would. indicate that the nitrate impairment of the ground water was a result of ;the leaching of nitrates from the surface of the area followed by deep percolation and addition to the ground water body. The magnitude of the possible contribution :f'rcm the three potential sources noted above is discussed 1n the following sections.
Sedimentary Rocks
y In a report by the United States Geological Survey it was noted that in certain areas of California nitrate deposits in the form o-t sodium nitrate have been found. Generally, these nitrate · deposits are associated with shale or clay :formations l.aid down in lakes in the geologic past and occur as a result of physical. conditions ref1ecting climate and soil character rather than f'ran a unique geologic formation or condition.
Upon review of the geology, climate, and the character o! soil in the area, the possibility of a source of nitrate in the sediments of the Arroyo Grande Basin, appeared unlikely for several reasons. First, no evidence of B:rJ.Y n1 trate bee.ring formations in the source rocks of the Arroyo y Nobl.e, T. F., and Mansfield, G. R. "Nitrate Deposits in the Ame.rgosa Region, Southeastern California", United States Geological. SUrvey, Bull.etin 724-, 1922.
-8-
! I •
j
l
-!
1111 I
j
I ] I
i
f
·f
~
g
.. I
;f
~
i
t
;,
'"
~
Grande Basin sediments couJ.d be found. Second, as mentioned previously, there was a de.finite absence ot nitrates in the subsurt'ace inflow. In view of these facts, 1n addition to the apparent cyclic nature of the nitrate concentrations 1n the ground water, this possible source can be ruled out.
Danestic Sewage
The City of Arroyo Grande sewage treatment plant is located in the Fairoaks area and serves about two-thirds of the city's population which resides east of Halcyon Road. The pl.ant bas a design capacity ot 250,000 gallons per d~, and 1s presently treating about 220,000 gallons per day.
Effluent tram the treatment plant 1s discharged to spreading ponds south of the plant. The location of the sewage treatment plant and spreading ponds is shown on Plate 4. Sewage from the uneewered commercial and residential areas west of Halcyon Road including Grover City and the unincorporated Oceano area, is discharged into individual septic tanks and cesspools which serve the area.
The total pop.tlation 1n the sewered and unsewered areas contriboouting sewage wastes to Arroya Grande Basin is estimated to be approximately 12,500. Pop.tla.tion of the City .of Arroyo Grande is approximately 3,300; however, sewage from only about 2,200 passes through the treatment plant.
The present sewage production of 220,000 gallons per day is equivalent to 100 gallons per capita per day. Assuming that the per ca.pi ta sewage output is the same in the unsewered area, the present popll.a.tion of 12,500 is producing about 1,250,000 gallons ot sewage per day, most of which eventual.l.y percolates to the underlying ground water body.
-9-
• ~ - j > '- • ~ , .,, ,- "": ' : rJ, - .... '• J
r
I
i
I
I
I
The mineral analyses of two samples of sewage efnuent from the Arroyo Grande sewage treatment plant indicate that"nitrogen was present in concentrations of 11 ppn and 31 ppn, indicating nitrate potentials of 48 to 136 ppn, respectively. Assuming that the maximum concentration of 31 ppn of nitrogen was present 1n al1 of the sewage output in this area, it is possible that as much as 117,000 pounds of nitrogen per year could be &dded to the local. ground waters i"rom sewage wastes. .Although the nitrogen in the sewage effiuent is not in the nitrate or nitrite form, it is probable that oxidation and conversion to the nitrate form do occur.
Fertilizers
A land use survey conducted by the department in 1959 indicated a large part of the lower Arroyo Grande Valley was devoted to irrigated !381"iculture. Results of this survey are shown on Plate 4. Much of these lands are still under irrigation at the present time. The two major crops in the area are celery and strawberries. About 450 acres east and south of Arroyo Grande Creek are used for growiJ:lg celery, and sane 300 acres west and north I of Arroyo Grande Creek are used for growing strawberries. In addition about I
I
I
I
2, 000 acres within and ad.Joining the area of investigation are planted to corn, beans, broccoli, and other miscellaneous crops.
Commercial. :fertilizers containillg a high percentage of nitrogen are applied to the crops grown in the area. The average anrn,al application of nitrogen for celery is 290 pounds per acre, for strawberries 145 pounds per acre, and for other crops, about 90 pounds per acre.
Based on these application rates, it is estimated that the quantity of nitrogen for ·a11 crops combined tote.ls some 350,000 pounds. The actual -10-
I
I
I
I
,11
I•· -~{111 .,
y
.•.
li ,
l1
'I
ii .,, '
;.\-
,· ' . ~ I . f }
( !
I
l
' i
l '(
' ; l
l
'
' (,
'j
f .
I . i appl.ication of fertilizer for a single year on the overlying basin may well. be two or more times this amount because of the occasional practice of double cropping.
Not e.ll of the nitrogen applied to the agricultural lands :remains in the basin to add to the n1 trate impairment. Much of it is absorbed in the growth process of the p1ants in widely varying amounts depending on the particular crop. It is estimated that ot the 350,000 pounds ot nitrogen applied annually, about 2001 000 pounds remain in the basin as a result of excess applied waters and Ullharvested root and pl.ant systems.
It therefore appears that the major source of the nitrate :illlpairment to the ground water of the lower Arroyo Grande Valley is the nitrogenous f"ertilizers applied in the intensive farming conducted in this area. These nitrates are transported to the ground water body primarily by the deep percolation of rainfall and secondarily by the deep percolation of irrigation water appl.ied in excess of the consumptive use.
WAT.ER WELL CONS'mUCTION PRACTICES THAT
MAY ALLEVIATE lf.I'l'RATE IMPAIRMENT
Whil.e there appears to be no feasible means to economically eliminate or greatly reduce the preoom:1nant sources of nitrates to the ground waters of the lower Arroyo Grande Valley, there are certain vater well construction and seal.ing practices tbat can be adopted to :illlprove the qua.llty of the ground water extracted from this basin.
As part of this investigation, drilling techniques and construction practices f'or a total of 21 wells in the basin were evaluated in terms of their 1n:f'l.uence on ground water impairment. Data on the method of drilling, depth of well, extent of' perforations., existence of gravel packing and seals, -ll-
~
l
J
I
I
I
' t:i
I
I
l
-!
~
·. E
I I i I ! I
t
and nitrate concentrations in the ground water from the selected wells were '
collected, and are presented in Table l, 1
11 3Ummary of Well Construction
Practices". These data indicate that there is a relationship between the degree of nitrate concentration and the method of developnent of the wells.
More than one-half of the wells presented in Table l had nitrate concentrations in excess of 45 ppn, the recommended upper limit in the United States Public Health Service Dr1nk1ng Water Standards. Each of' these wells exbi.bited one or, more of the following charaeteristic:s: It had been drilled to a -depth l.ess than ·70 feet; it bas been perforated· at levels less than 70 f'eet below ground surface, or it had been gravel packed f'or most of its depth. These factors probably account for the high nitrate concentrations in the ground water extracted from these wells. Wells perforated at the shallower depths and those with gravel packing provide avenues for shall.ow ground water conta1n1ng high concentrations of nitrate to enter the wells. The quality of t~e ground water fran the deeper strata is apparently low in nitrates and Sllltable for danest1c purpo~es.
It therefore appears that water wells drilled to the deeper strata and perforated at depths of more than 70 feet below the ground surface woul.d provide ground water free of excessive nitrate concentrations. If a gravel pack is used the top of the pack ahould be 70 feet or l:lDre be1ow the ·ground suri'ace, and the space above .tbe .. pack should be .adquately sealed to the ground surface.
These water well construction procedures should all.eviate the present problems; however, the deep percolation of return flows and precipitation will continue to carry waters of excessive nitrogen concentration :trom the fertilizers applied on the surface to the ground water bcdy. OVer a period of time, this condition could continue until most of the ground -12-
~ •
I
I
,,
I
' :·
I '
I
H
:fl
!111
~ ' ... , -
t:.
........ f'-,-, . . .. ~
·~,·:r. . - - ..... 1· • .... ~.: ~ ~ -;. ... 1-:,.·, • .., - •• - ,.~ .
TABLE No. l
SUMMARY OF WELL CONSTRUCTION PRACTICF.s
State well :-- - . Perforated~ - . Gravel . --- -- :Range o? . . . number : ~:eth* . intervals* . l!Cked*: Seal :N?3 in ppn • . 32S/13B-19Nl 37~C) 32-37 No Cone. Base 15-133
-28El. 133 R) 93-133 36?-133 . 11-36 14-22
-28E5 22 - .. - 45
-29Dl ll5(C) 79-85, 96-100, No - 0-2
105-ll.3
-29~ l.30(C) 60-70, 113-117 No - 115
-29D3 70 61-70 - - 95
-29El 180{R)? 36-18o Yes Yes 36+ 3-144
-29E2 l80?(R) 36-180 Yes Yes 8-41
-29E3 18o~R} 36-180 Yes Yes 37
-~l 223 R) - Yes - 9-60
-2902 250~R) 130-250 Yes 20 2-4
-2903 250 R) 103-250 0-223 37 2
-29Pl 87 - - - 3
-30Hl 51. 44-50 No - 104-163
-30H2 61 55-61 - - 46-124
-30K6 160 15-21, 29-Bo,
91-103, 108-ll.3 - - 10-78
-30L2 57(C) 54-57 No - 5-67
-30Pl Bo - - - 15-20
-30Rl 63 58-63 No - 62-115
-30R2 l28(R) 81-l.20 0-120 - · 175 .. 3lBl 44(c) 38-44 No - 9D-107 -32Al 1'6~c) 4o-1'6 No - U-J.67
-32D2 li.6 R) - Yes - 24
-32D4 107.5 - - - 35
-32Hl 38 - - - 67-125
-32L2 95 60-66, 75-89 - - 3
-33n 82 - - - 6
* In feet
C - Cable Tool
R - Rotary
-13-
h
,1;
J
' t '~
;I
,,
;~
,!
I
·!l
' L
h
.,
,I
. '
~
:i
.. ~
' i
,:
'.!
j
r·1 :,
I
I
I
f
I
I
water is not suitable for domestic purposes. The long range solution is to obtain a water supply of adequate qµality :f'rom an alternative source for use ·1n the domestic suppl.y systems of the a.rea., leaving the ground water for irrigation uses.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
The high level ot concentration in the ground waters in the vicinity of Grover City appears to be primarily the result of widespread application of commercial fertilizers on the overlying agriculture lands. .. Additional amounts are the result of deep percolation of sewage ef:f'luent :f'rom the Arrcyo Grande sewage treatment plant and the septic tanks and cesspools serving the unsewered portions of the valley. Natural precipi tation and applied irrigation waters, which percolate downward through the soil., transport the soluble salts of the fertilizers and sewage to the underlying water-bearing zones.
High nitrate concentrations were found to exist primarily in wells with depths of less than about 70 f'eet. In the deeper wells, nitrates appeared. to be excessive only if' the wells were perforated in the shal.low depths or were gravel packed.
:RECCM-1ENDATIONS
Rigid standards for the initial construction of water wells and the possible destruction or disuse of wells shou1d be developed to protect the deeper ground water supplies f'rom further impairment :f'rom the application of nitrogenous fertilizers and domestic sewage. Pending the adoption of such water -well standards., the nitrate problem in the Grover City a.rea woul.d -14-
' {,
· I
r
·t
L
I
':
J
11 I
' f'
tt
I '" l
I
t i .! -
,,;
! ·1: l
~1-
l! :
j I
' ' I
f
' . "'' - - . . ' . - - ' ·~ . ,· . . -.""
be materially alleviated if' the following precautions were observed in the drilling of wells:
1. Wells for domestic purposes should be drilled to depths greater than 70 feet in order to penetrate the deeper water-bearing zones.
2. To prevent shallow; poor quality water from entering wells, only the deeper water-bearing zones should be perforated.
3. Gravel packing should not be placed between the ground surface and a depth of 70 feet for all wells~ This will greatly reduce the possibility of' nitrogenous water percolating and mixing with the waters in the deeper water-bearing zones.
4. Pollution seals for rotary drilled wells shou1d be placed at a depth of at l.east 70 feet, and in the case of cable tool. drilled wells the seal shoul.d be p1a.ced at least 5 feet be1ow the base of the pit used to install the hydrau1ic jacks.
5. A sanitary seal shou1d be placed at the ground surface a.round wells to prevent surface and shal.1ow ground waters fran entering the well~ -15-
Ir
.
~
I
![.
11:
I
~I
·:u
'·,
.,1
r
t:
iii; ~ • ;,, • - • • - • 't • - ' • ~ • • 4i • : • • • ' ,.,, •• I
I
~
SAN LUIS OBIS , 0 COUNTY
o SAN LUIS OBISPO
J ' ·~
(
S4 ,y
'----.. · F°'\.__
. · · --....._ 3-._N TONIO - -........ ... --..._ CL'>
·--~£"x
··------ SANTA BARBARA
0 LOMPOC
\
·· ----
/
LOCATION MAP
\
~ ••. A f £ !
... -. ) l ,,_.I""
u ..... _.) ~
.. 1 E ;:7:o
I~
--·r
~OUNTY; ) ~ I
\
)
-.... ·. r' _ __ _ y --·
·-· .,,,-- RIVcR:
. )
I
SANTA BARBARA
DE~l'ITM£NT Of' WATE" l'l!:SOUIIICE.S
90UTMIUtN DIST .. ICT
INVESTIGATION OF NITRATES IN
GROUND WATER, GROVER CITY,
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
AREA OF INVESTIGATION - SCAL! OF MILES
~ ~ ...!i j
.·
.,
'
; . . ~
- ' . ~ .. . . . - ......
J
I
I
ll
~
..
C
0 "'
:i
...
...
... "'·
z -.
~
0 ...
C
>
...
.... ,
...
SOUTHWEST
B ,.
...
...
"' u
'"~
..,
0 I[
C
WO " .,
0 >-
0 150 "' " C
100 1-
I 50
Osr
.,
.,
"' .,
"' N
..,
- ..
..,
~ ~
~ "' ~ N "' ...
N
..
;;;
.:.
...
oc
0 0.,
~~ ... ;;; ~N
.....
NORTHEAST
B'
Z50
zoo
GROUND SURFACE:
100
Qso 50
f,---
0 .
Qso -1--,.;..=-=--=-=--=Wl--,,t.;J-= --!1
~ ----: ... .,-;cE;. ,.- ----S-EA- ---cr;;cvE"'L ________________ ...:.,:~ ____ ....j O 50 Oal
100
150
zoo
--
/
/
I
I
I
--- ---- ---
50 TQp
--- 100
-- --- -------- 150
ZOO•
25o '--------------------------- ----------------------------.:...._ _ _J 250.
A
SOUTHWEST
=~
·~ ~ ,ooL
)0
0 So r
{
Oal I
I 100~ /
l~O iI ZOO-·-· --
-- --
,..
..
I
"' .,
"' '
.,
.. ' u•
... -: .. J -~ ...
.... ~-· ... .., ;:: ~ "' .. ~~
SECTION
r -- ~ROU ~O SURf'4C£
TQ p -- .
-
SECTION
.,
0 ..
.:.
..
..
a
• "' .:.
~
A -A'
B -El'
NORTHEAST
...
:,
ci z
..,
> .. .. N Oso /, .:. / /"j "'
/ / / /
---- / -- TOp /
/
/
/
/
/ Tu / .,
.
-----· - --
A'
250
200
ISO
100
50 0
so
100
150
200
~ -
LEGEND
SOIL
SAND
GRAVEL
Cl..AY
PERFORATED IHTERVAI..
~ RECE"T A"D UPPER PLEISTOCENE •LLUVIUM
~ RECENT SANO OUNES
~ UPPER PLEISTOCENE SAND DUNES
~ PASO ROBLES FORMATION
;J'101f'fEAENTIATEO TERTIARY FORMAT'IO*'(S
ptOTE : LOCATION OF SECTIONS '-RC SHOW'flt C~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOUR
SOUTHERN OISTRICT
INVESTIGATION OF NITRATES
GROUND WATER, GROVER CITY
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
GEOLOGIC
-SECTIONS
A-A1 AND B-81
;
;
I
1-
<t
C
z
£
0 ~
<t
>
....
_,J
...
C
200
100
100
200
SOUTHWEST
,Osr
z
N
.,
~ ;;;:
"' N
.,
:s
N
.,
.:. .,
;;;:
VI
N
..,
" ..,
..,
a:
u
..,
0 z
..
0:
...
0 ,..
0 0:
0:
..
I
Qal /
--------_..,,,.
I
/
..,
>
..
..
0 z
..
0:
C,
0 >-
0 0:
a:
..
~ROUNO SURFACE~
S A lEVf.L
TOp
------
ii
TQp
---
0 ..
0 ,; 0:
.. 0 N z C ,!, 0
ff >-
"' u
~ ...I
.. N :r
"'
f
Oso
TQp
--- - -- - Tu
NORTHEAST
-:c
I
:r
z
0 ;:: ., u-
"' . "'::; -:,
.....
... - ....
':'•
.. .....
~:.
~i
I
c'
200
00 f-----10
100
PLATE 2B
300 .,_ ___ __________ ________ _______________________________________ ___________ _.300.
SECTION c- c'
SOUTHWEST NORTHEAST
":,:
-u -.. I
I I :c u C,
z " z " z "' Q!! .., Q !!m .., "' I- 0: I- ,_- a: u· u u u - u ... w-' "' ..,...1 "' > '1)5 .., ., "'5 .. 0 0 .;m z
z .,..,, z ... Sl u • .. _..,, .. 0 0 .., .. 0: N $ z ., " ":'"' ... ":' ;C) .. .:, ... 0 " z ...... e o' 0 ....... C, !:! ~ .,~ "' ~t:: ,. - .. 0 ' 0 "' u ~i a: "' ~~ 0:
~ ...I a: .,
N 0: .. "' ... .. :c
I ~ 100
I I
GROUND 100
Qso
Ool
100
---- -- ------ --------------------
Qal
TOp
lOO
200 ._ _ _ _ _ _ _____ ____________ _ _ ___________________ _ ____ __J 200
SECTION D - D'
~ SOIL
E ... .. ·.:-' ,) SANO
GRAVEL
1111 CLAY
LEGEND
tim PERFORATED INTERVAL
~ RECENT ANO UPPER PLEISTOCENE IILLUIIIUM
~ RECENT SAND DUNE$
~ UPPER PLEISTOCENE SANO DUNES
~ PASO ROBLES FORMATION
~~ r.
;ii' { ~ UNDIFSERENT•ATEO TERTIIIRY FORMATIONS
z"'
~ ~ I
L
~
NOTE: LOCATION OF SECTION$ AR[ SHOWN ON PLATE 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
SOUTHERN DISTRICT
0 INVESTIGATION OF NITRATES IN
GROUND WATER, GROVER CITY,
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
GEOLOGIC -SECTIONS
c-c' AN o o-o'
1,-alL(
33 Kl
QI.
0 T.32 S M.O.B. a M.
T. 12 N. 25 R.36W R 35W S.B.B. 8 M. 30 29
22 I
LEGEND
WATER WELL
LINE OF EQUAL GROUND WAT
-10- ELEVATION
A---A GEOLOGIC SECTIONS
.TATI[ 01' CALll'OflNIA
01!:PARTMENT 0 .. WATE" ,.ESOU,.Cl!:S
SOUTHK"N 01aT ft IC T
INVESTIGATION OF NITRATES IN
GROUND WATER GROVER CITY
SAN LUIS OBl~PO COUNTY
LINES OF EQUAL ELEVATION
· OF GROUND WATER
SPRING 1960
.Z5
SCALE
5 1962
C")
0 C")
t1\
l>
z.
T. 32 S
T. 12 N
25 FAIROAKS
-· -
R 36 'N R 35W S.B.B. a M. 30 "°'*--.. Ml
21 ARROYO GRANDE
; ,, ... Berros
/ · .-
.33 ! F / · • . ,. ' ' '
. ' .·,· • • . Kl
'!;I . ... ,
. -~~/ -~" ... ' -,J,'!•i/ . .. . _..,,,.,.,, r • ' • f • • ,f"'.,./ +' .,. ,: I : .. ... ,' .- ;'
'I•:, ",/.': ;,.': r, ,# ..
· . . - L 2 _ •
.,/· •· ... . '
29 22
·-
LEGEND
• SURFACE WATER SAMPLING STATION
C=:J IRRIGATED AREAS IN 1959
NI. WATER WELL
- SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT
APPROXIMATE AREA IRRIGATED
WITH SEWAGE EFFLUENT
7 0 . NITRATE CONCENTRATION
11 DIAMETER
~ IS PROPORTIONAL TO
' IOOPPN NO] 7
STAT!!: Of" CALIIFO,.NIA
DEPARTMENT 01" WATER RESOURCES
SOUTM~IIIN 019TfltlCT
INVESTIGATION OF NITRATES IN
GROUND WATER, GROVER CITY,
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
. ~
NI TR ATE CONCENTRATIONS IN GROUND WATER
SPRING 1961
SCALE .25 I MILE
1962
.. V • , • 1 - • ; .:.,._·t,..~-\!' _:_:
,-
~
a.
a.
PLATE 5A
175 r------..---------.------T--------r------ - --,----1----~-------.------ ·- ----~------ 32S/13E- 30Hl ...
125 t------t-------f-------f------+--------+---+----1------+-----+-I _____ .__ ____ _ 0 ..__ _____ ,___ _____ .,___ _ ____ .,___ _ ____ .,__ _____ _,__ _____ .,___ _____ ..,,__ __ _;_ __ ,.L_ _____ ..1-_____ _,J 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959
Y~AR
1960 1961 1962
9TATlt 0, CA~Lf'o,tMA
OEP.ARThotl!:""1" Of'" W~T£.I'\ ..CSOUlltOCS
INVESTIGATION OF NITRATES. IN
GROUND WATER, GROVER CITY,
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
~
NITRATE CONCENTRATION VS TIME
- ------ -
'
l
,!
I
I
I
I
~
a..
Q.
z
I :~~: , .
PLATE 58
175 ,-------,,,...._----,------.------r------,------,--. ..,..._ ---..---------.--------:,-----,-------, J
,,
150 1------+-------+-------+-------+------+------ht--,~1 ---------------,1------+-------1 ,' \ j \
125 t-----+-----+-------+------+------+-------A·~ '---1\1-------if------+---· --4-----~ ~'*'-· : ,, '
! ,,,, \ ',~~'\
1 / 32S/13E-30H2
100 1--------+-------l------+------+-------i-~:.__.il __ ---l _____ -11_-\~·....J-.. ~--~-----'--------1 I ,' I \ ,, / , 32S/13E-32Hr/ / ·' \ /\ \/ /
75 1-------+------+------+------+---..;/,C-----l----4----+----t----1--#-----+--l-#/ _____ I--____ --I ., I ' / \ \·
- -., - - -- - . 32S/8E-32A/ \1 \) 50 1-------+------+------+---=.....---=--t-------+-~,,_----l,-----___..._-+-___ _!l~l--------+----------I . .__ ---.. " I
25 l-----~. -+------+-------+------t------+------+-------l------4------~------l " QL-____ __._ _____ ..,L_ ____ __._ _____ ....1,_ ____ --1, _____ _._ ____ ___J _____ _L _____ L.,_ ____ __J 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959
YEAR
1960 1961 1962
STATIE 01" CAL.ll"OANIA
DEF"AAT MENT 0, WATER f11Ed0UAC£S
SOUTHIERN DISTRICT
INVESTIGATION OF NITRATES IN
GROUND WATER, GROVER CITY,
SAN LUIS •)BISPO COUNTY
~
NITRATE CONCENTRATION VS TIME
APPENDIX A
MINERAL ANALYSES OF SURFACE WA'lffiS
IN THE VICIHI'J'Y OF GROYm CITY
t Eati- ,Temper-• I I parthler million Parts e!!r milUon t 1 mated I atW'e 1 I ECxl06 I Constituents 1n I ' I 1Total I Tote.I 1PerLocation I Date I flow I ,men I pH I at I equi-anta per m.illion I I I 1 dis- 1 hard- scent 1 sampled 1 in 1aampled1 , 25° C I t I I I I I I I I F : B 1Si021solved1 neaa I Na ots I OF I I I Ca I MB I Na I K I co_a • HC03 ' S04 I Cl I N03 I : 1 1solida:(CaC03)1 Canyon Noa. 1 and 3- 3-61 0.25 64 7,5 1,555 61 58 175 28 0 510 66 255 0 1.2 0,50 42 968 393 47 2 at Highway 101 3-"M 4.78 7.00 o.n lf 8.31 !';'ff 7.2i' lf Arroyo Grande Creek 3-27-61 - 62 7.9 11,000 222 274 2050 55 0 393 744 3464 0 o.4 1.3 18 7,626 1,676 72 at s. P. Crossing ~ ~as.I!~ Ir ~~ ~~
Arroyo Grande Creek 2 .. 13 .. 54 12.7 - 8.l 935 110 50 43 4 - 375 180 39 6 0.5 o.oe - 684 480 16 at Arroyo Grande 00 4.lo ~ o.11" rn 3.76 r.w o.m
Avenue
2- 6-58 35 52 a.5 726 82 36 26 2 8 296 128 21 3 0.1 0.12 25 491 353 14 4-'lo 2,.95 ~ ~ o.3' 4.85 2,66 0.00 o.os' p
,
1 ..... Upper Los Berroa 3- 3 .. 51 o.s 66 8,3 2,160 251 118 98 6 2 547 689 123 9 0.2 0.23 26 1,792 1,113 16 Creek at Valley Road !2.56 9.70" 4.25 o.I6 ~ s.'96 14.89 3-44 o.'14 Arroyo Grande Creek 11-10-50 0.5 - 8,3 1,010 122 59 45 5 12 418 220 36 0 - 0.02 30 735 547 15 o.5 mile S/o 6-"0V 4.85 f:§6 03 ~ rn ... sa r.o1' lf
Highlfa.y 101
Arroyo Grande Creak 2- 4--fJO 8 56 7.9 1,165 135 59 54 3 0 424 263 53 5 0,7 0,06 31 825 580 17 at Hi.pay 101 Os 4,85 2.36 o.[a Ir ~ 5.48 1.50 o.oa
Arroyo Grande Creek 2- 6-58 35 53 a.2 550 86 36 24 2 0 323 129 21 2 0.3 0.09 25 491 365 13 Gaging Station 4.30 s.oo" 1,05 0.04 0 5.30 2':68 0.60 0,04 Tar Springs Creek a- 2-61 2.0 68 8.2 1,060 126 57 40 2 0 439 220 42 0 0.3 0,10 22 678 551 14 0,1 mile E/o Arroyo 6,30 4':7Y L75 D.05 0 f:2o 4.59 r;rr 0 Grande Creek
,, .-........ , • 41 , • - - ~-,~--':"' - .,.,~,- , - • :.-;,: ·•nJ>.•,;,~·· - oe , •• ·-;;,;-:-:.'l:.,r~:("3~~~~'ll"R":'~~~,::--,,i,'"',~:•·:'-',_,,....~,...._'Y"'"",..-~.~-,=.~~----.#'·· w~- ,, .. -, ·,--•,- ... -,...-.;---i,,,- ' •. - < -·.;
~=-, -
- -"----··- --... - - - - - , --.-
APPENDIX B
HltERAL ANALYSES 01 GROUND WATERS
IN THE VICINITY OF GROV!':R CITY
:Temper-1 I I parts fir mllllon Parta 2!!r million 1
: , ature : I ECz106 I : I I :fatal: Total :PerState well I Date 1 when : pH : at I Conetituenta in eqUiva-enii pe.r iiilffion I : ; : dis- t hard- :oeut number : 1a111pled :sampled: I 25° C I : r : : I t I t I p I B , s10:2 ,1olved1 neas I Na.
I Op : : : Ca : ~ : Na. :
K : C03 : ijJ03 1 ~04 : Cl . N03_: __ : __ : ,~olids: (ce.003):
'.}2S/1JE-l9Nl 9-29-54 1'J 6.') 4~ & b & l 0 22 41 &a ~ 0.1 0.03 - 292 ')2 52
0.03 0 ~ 0.85
8-29-57 - 6.5 5~ 22
~~1 64 2 0 22 2L ~ 86 o.o 0.20 2, 336 117 ~
1.12 I:79 0.05 0 'o:3' 1.21 r.lio
2- 6-58 - 6.3 511 18 & ~ 1 0 22 33 ~ ~ 0.2 0 30 353 100 53 o.;o o.U3 0 ~ ~
2-16-59 - 6.4 475 &a 16 h 1 0 18 P.n ~ ~!44 o.o 0.0.3 33 353 133 46 ~ o.Ui' li o.JJ 9-22 .. 59 78 7.2 620 26 & ~ l 0 24 i~21 ZL 114 0 o.,o 27 %1 1.33 51 -a; o,oj 0 °'" 2.10 t:1'i~
')-20-60 - 6.4 716 ~~5')
16 ~ 2 0 ~?li2 ~ 2L 75 0 0.10 11 456 155 52
1.50 0.05 0 2.21 r.Il
3- 2-61 - 6.3 725 ~ & 2!_ 2 0 26 80 ~ ill.. 0 0.10 26 490 164 49 lo')O 3.15 'o.1iTf 0 o.lj.3 rn 2.j5 2.15
-22Cl .3- ,-01 - 6.8 390 20 14 48 2 0 108 41 .2L 0 o.8 o.26 50 288 108 49
1.01 Ll5 'wo 0.65 0 r.,g 'o:'$ 1.55 0
-22Pl 3- ,-61 - 7.5 2,200 w., ~ 98 4 0 621 822 121 0 0.2 0.21 21 1,9.36 1,268 14 6 o.~ ~ o.fi 0 Io.Ia Yr.12 Y-1io 0
-28El 9-29-54 13 7.4 1,020
~ ~ 46 2 0 422 ¥.ts ~ 14 0.1 o.o .. 692 499 17
5. 1:'5I ~ 0 6.91 1 • .3 0.22
.3- ,-61 - 7.5 1,070 112
~ & 2 0 411
~ 60 22 0.1 0.10 24 660 497 lj
5.5j 0.05 0 b.13 ~ 0.35
~,_-,. ·::••· • ,1.- ·:c.__e. •-' , .r.,., ,. • • r. "C,··~·. ~ ' APIUDIX B
t,aNERAI, ANAL'YSES OP OROOND WATERS
IN THE VICINITY OF GROVER CITY
(oontimled)
cTemper-1 : r
COMtituerrta in f8M8 f&J' million
Parts E!r million
r a:ture : I ECxlo6 : r . : :Total. i Tatar :Per- equS.valents per million . State well s Date & when : pH : at : . . : : : dis- : bai'd- :oent number 1 sampled reampled: I 25° C r : : I . . . 1 ~NO 1 F : B : s102 :solved: ness : Na.
OF : : : C& : ~ I Na I IC ; C03; HC03; so4 ; Cl I 3 I : : :eol1de:(caeo3):
.'32S/l.3E-28E5 J-~l - 6.8 6.30 40 28 trs 1 0 l:~1 ~ !Jo ~ 0.1 0 18 422 215 .34 2.01 2.28 0.0, 0 • 5 1.12
-2,01 9-2~~ - 7,8 934 ~ ~ lj4 bs 0 412 144
~ 2 0.1 0.05 - 583 442 18 3.99 ~ 0 r.75 2,99 o.o4
J- 5-57 66 7.4 ?87 67 42 44 4 0
~ 112 & 0 0 o.o6 16 481 .341 22
J:,i 'Pi7 1.91 0.09 0 2.3.3 a
I1
3- 3-61 7.3 980 108 44
~ ~ lli.. ~ I - 642 449 to, 0 0 0 0.1.3 29 17 0 5.39 .3.85 0 3.10 0 -29D2 5- 9-61 70 7.4 620 ~!45 ~ 48 2 0 &i &a ~ ~ 0.1 0.25 29 466 201 34
2.10 o.154 0 5
•29D3 3- .3-61 - 7.2 480 '!L. 11 146 2 0 ~ ~ 46 .22.,_ 0 o.o6 29 320 112 47 1,35 0.89 2.00 0.05 0 ~ 1.53
-2';)El 3- 6-55 - 7.4 - ~ 42 44 - - & 116
~ 12 0,2'1 - - 705 ~ 19 ~ 1.91 r.tii' o.19 --
2- 6-57 - 7 • .3 - 80 ~ 42 - - ~ 112 42 35 0.20 - - 595 338 21 tr.oI r.,; 2 • .33 m o.57'
11-11-60 - 7,9 ?63 67 .31 ~ ¼.o, - 141 160 ~ ~ 0,2 o.08 35 585 29~ 28 'f."j1 T.91 T.1Ri T-15
3- ~l - 7.2 665 n ~ ¥.;a ¼.a,; 0 122 & 62 144 0.2 O.J.,3 27 610 314 27 tr r.oo ~ cy
-29E2 2- 6-57 - 7.8 - 76 35 41 - - 271 105 44 34 0.10 - - 580 ,,3:,4 21 'r.1§ T.W ,1-.78 ~ :-T.'iS ,, .I:111 o.s!
~---=.........,.,.i _ ____,--:.;_
.-~ - - · - ... ---- --L..........::..-_____________________________________ . a.4~
APPENDIX B
MINmAL ANALYSES OF GROUND VATEIIS
IN THE VICINITY OF GROVER CITY
(oont1nued) ... - •=a,
:Ttrnpe:r-: • 1 Parta·-per million : ature : : ECltl.o6 , Constituents 1n parts per million : s : :Total : Tota:r:PerState well Date : when : pH : at : equivalents per lllllion : : ; : dis- : hard- :oent number : 11ampled :sampl'ld: : 250 C : • : : : : 1 1 1 : F : B : S1<>2 :solved: ness : Na OF : : : Ca l Mg I Na : K : co,: HC03 I s04: Cl I N03 I : : :eol1ds:(CaCOl):
J!S/13£-29E2 11-11-60 - 6.8 786 §1__ .n__ IJ8 2 -- !Q2__ 122 53. _ 53 0.1 O.<H )5 658 )05 26 » r.,11 T.'07 ~ ~ 2.55 r.tij I:4V
,,.-
-29E3 11-11-60 - 7.0 8o6 71* 1S._ 48 1._ - ~ 136 §J_ 'fl 0,1 O.~ _34 598 328 25 Y-71 ~-2.08 ~ Y-J7 l:"m 1;78 rn -2901 11-13-50 - 7.5 872 90 43 37 J__ ~ 361 ,UL ~ 10 - 0.01 _34 558 4o2 17 1i':1ij M'f I:bi o;(f/ 0 ~ 2~ o.~o 'o;iX
tlJ
.:, r 6-,J 65 7.4 ~ ~ 45. _ 38 1.._ ~ .36.3. 1116 ,lL_ ..L_ 0.2 0.01 25 591 442 16
5.09 J:Ji.l1 T:b5 o.07 o OB ~ 0.99 ~
2-18-59 64 7•'J 842 80 22__ '6_ 2 o 211 ~ ..5.1._ 60 0.2 o.06 30 601 360 18 1J:l)o Y-20 T:'58 ~ 1S J:115 J;n r.sa o.'r/
9-22-59 68 a.o 824 - - - - ~ n5_ - L - - - - - 364
0 3-85 ~
8- )-60 - 7.2 939 .22__ li6 ,a 2 o _m_ !2l._ 41 4o o.2ij 0.11 24 651 435 16 1J;j2-;:,s"m;~ 0 ~,-;IBr:i7~
1~ 6...(;o 66 7.a 903 - - - - o m._ - ~ - - - - - 4.39
0 "&:08 1.2'
-29G2 2- 4-57 - 7•7 - 100 46 44 - - )81 142 46 8 Oo20 - - 765 4)8 18 ii.99 J:78 1, 91 b.21i T.°;b r.;ci a.ii
2-18-59 64 8.1 981l 110 -51_ 33 2 O 415 ~ ~ 4 0,2 o.o, 31 661 49.3 13 ~~t:llli~ 'ti b.lm~o.,Oo.cjg'
-290.3 2- 4-57 - 7.5 - ~-- 116 40 - - .376 ~ ~ 8 0.20 ., - -- 745 428 17 ~ ,.,s r.,i rn ~ r.<11 0.13 1 . !)!}'., '., -·~: .,,~(~:~r,;;~,..;iW 1\lllJtti'IW(,:t.'ll!li(-.Jb."ti!'.f~~ Wll~ uiit1i:/ilf,<l!l!:li!.!i~·~~-~,;'3lliii;ffil'a(;;JH,l.~,m.wfll~Wi!-i,N,,,s:.,~il",.,...,t'W.;1, ,-.,.., '"'''""'' •• , ... ,,.,,,., .. ,,,,,.,-.. ,~,,,-..,, .. ;,,,..., ....... _.. ·-~.-- '"' ' ,, ._ ,_. ·1 J'~f. f1 ,,
•._pPEJL - ~: . MINERAL JlliALYSES OF GROUND \-TATERS
IN THE VICWI'l'Y OF GROYm CI'l'Y
(continued)
:'l'emper-:
; ECx1o6 ; Constituents in parts per m1llion
Pe.rte per million
: a.ture : : : 1Total; Tota.l :PerState ,,:ell Da.te , when : pH . a.t I equivalents per million . : : : : dis-, he.rd- :oent number sampled :sampled: : 250 C : : : I . . :
s04: : I F I B 1 S102 :solved: ness : Na.
I OF f : Ca. Mg : Na : K ; C0.3 : HC03 1 Cl ; 003 : I : :sol1ds:(caco3):
J2S/l,'.3E-J0H2 9-22-59 - 7.3 652 ~ ~~64
40 2 0 ~ ~~14
64 ~ 0.18 o."6 26 two 219 28
(continued) I:'15 0.05 0 1.80 •
2-2~0 62 7., 700 - - - - 0
~ - & 110 - - -- - 238
0 rm
9-20-00 - 7.6 69.3
~~2?
20 40 2 0 ~ L i?41 86 0.2 0.12 .32 452 1~ 30
1.69 1.75 0.05 0 2.50 1.12 Ctr td
J
.3- 2-ol 1., 100 26 42 2
~ ~ ~~3 \1\ - 26 1162 2)4 28 .5.L -- ~ 0.1 0.10
2.53 T.i1i l.'85 0.05 •
-.30K6 11 ... 13-50 - 8.l 872 & 24 48 2 0 &s ~ 42 24 - 0.02 36 545 3.30 24
1.37 2.09 ~ 0 • 1.18 0.39
.3- 5--51 -- 7.5 - ZL tro 41 - 0 210 lll
~ 45 o.:i!O - - 535. 4.38 .~2
.3.59 r.n 0 J:liii '.h'.31 o.72
8- .3-60 - 7.6 998 & 41 ~ l 0 ~ 142 100 ~ 0.2 0,1, 25 663 .388 2.3 .3 • .39 0.0.3 0 .3.22 ~ 2-!i
-301.2 9-29-54 96 7.5 761
4~61
41 40 2 0
~ 124
~ 20 0.1 0.20 - 580 ,~ 18
~ r.,i ~ 0 r.;a 0
8-29-57 - 7.a 901
~ 40 41 2 0 .317 fil_ 51 't.w 0.10 0 • .30 20 631 3,1 20 y.;; 1.81 a.or; 0 5.20 2.39 1.41+
2- 6-58 62 7.2 855
~ 47 i~70 2 0 311
~ ~ 22 0, 0.10 31 590 .370 19
.3.90 ~ 0 5.10 0 • .35
9-29-58 - 7.4 a:n - - - - 0
~ ~ - 46
1.jo - - - - -- 3'11
..
'
.lPPZNDIX B
MINERAL ANALYSES OP GROUND WATERS
IN TH& VICINITY OP GROVER CITY
(continued)
- ---- -- rTemper-1 I I p!lrts per million Part-aper m1llion I : ature : s ECxl~ : : I r :Total I Tota!" :PvState vell : Dat0 I •1hln Jfi l at I Conatituent, in ~uJ.va.1.ents per million I . I : dis-: hard• :oent : . rwmber : au:pleci : i;~.z,1pled: : 250 C : : Mg . : 1 co 1 11:0 1 S<>4 : : )K)I , l B : s1~ :solved1 nesa : Na Ca . Na. K Cl °F I : I I : I I 3 : 3 : : ' : : : 1aoUds:(CaC0l):
J2S/13E-30L2 2-18-59 - 7.4 741
~~60
}j__ ~ 2 0 & ~ ~ ¥.as 0.1 0.03 38 529 325 23
(continued} 2.90 0.05 0 3.55 .15
9-22-59 65 7.0 865 ~ ~ 4o l 0
~ ~ & 28 o.u 0.18 28 645 389 18
1.73 0,02 0 ,39 o.45
2-2~0 65 7.3 950 & 1J4 48 2 0 & ~ 6'>
~ o., 0.12 ,o 590 406 20
;:n 2.09 ~ 0 0 T.1io
r1
.1 9-2o-60 7.3 ;.5 ~ ~ 42 2 0
~ ~ & :,--- - 22 0 0.15 13 686 41, 13 ~ 'o;o5 0 0.36 '
,- 2-61 - 7.1 1,5,0
~ f.J2 60 bu 0 281 l.60
~ 1.6 0 0.10 25 l,~ 644 17
T.l;o 0 no 3.35 1 o:1b
-.30Pl 11-12-50 - 7.8 7~ ~ 26 &r 1 0
~ ¥.fi 32 15 - 0.02 '37 512 )146 19
T.ili 0:0, 0 • 9 0.90 0.24
,_ >'l - 7.5 910 94 .. , 38 2 0
~ 110 ~ 20 0.1 o.oi,. 27 574 410 17 ~ J;sI ~ ~ 1> 2.31 ~ -311U 2- 6-58 61 7.1 7/2 4-8 32 52 2 0
~ 67 'lB P.r, 0 0 30 530 250 :n
l:tm r.g-u r.w; ~ lJ r.» 2.20
10- 6-58 65 7.4 ,i.a 65 30 f.-;; ' 0
~ 99 ~ ~ o., o.o 35 470 285 29
J;l1J T.IJ1 ~ li • r.o,
2-18-59 - 7., 680 65 29 lf4 ., 0 1l!6 96 57 62 0.2 0.15 " ~, 280 25 ~ ~ L90 o.(IJ 0 3,05 2.00 l.bO I:oo
,-.22-5j 66 7.4 847 63 30 61 3 0 124 106 ~ ¥.k 0 o.42 2~ 585 260 j2 ,.14 T.Ji'.7 m o.o8 0 2.03 2.08 •
'\
APFUDIX B
HINERAL ANi\LY5ES OP GROUND \i.A.TERS
IN Tl£ VICINITY OF GRO'Vm CITY
(oarrtinutd)
,temper-: I I
Ocnat1t111nt• 1n pe.rta Er m1llion
Par1a I?!!: m!llon , 1 ature 1 I ECxlcti I I I I ,total : f otlll : PerState well I Dat• I when I pi I at I equin.hnta ptr m1ii1on I I I 1 dl•- 1 hard- zoent numbor , 1ampled 1aampled1 : 250 C ; : t I I I I I I , : B 1 Sl~ 11olvtd1 n .. a a II& Of I I ,ca:~1* : I: : C03 : HC0.3 : S()q I Cl I N03 : I I 1aol1da: (CaC03):
.32S/1JE-JOR1 2-~o 65 7.3 8')2
~ tr, lj6 2 0 !?fo 122 82 ~ o., o.o, ,2 560 JIJ'J 22
(oontinued) 2.00 a.al 0 ~ 2.)1
9-20-60 - 7.7 1,005
~ 41 & 2 0
~ ~ P.u 1L. 0.1 o.o, 21 '/')2 1+21 16
3.IJ5 0.05 0 3 1.23
3- 2--61 - 7.4 900 82 41 & 2 0 ~~~5 ~ ~ ~ 0,2 0.38 28 606 m 18 ~ J:1iJJ o.'ci 0 .,o co
I -30R2 3- 2--61 7.1 760 57 25 63 2 0 59 l<ii 67 175 0 o.olt 2, -...;J - 554 245 36 2,8.3 T.o'i 2.15 0.05 0 ~ 2.21 1.89 T.'8i
-31B1 6- ,-5, - 7.2 l,U4 107 'J7 73 4 0 258 163 ')l ')O a.o 0.10 -- 795 422 27 537 Pilf 3.16 o.iij 0 ~ 3.85 2.57 1.ii5
3- ,-01 - 7.1 1,180 !22... & &.. bu a 250 210 99 107 0 0.15 'l'/ 672 4j3 23
5.35 2.,0 0 ~ tr;j; T.'i"§ r:,;
-32Al 6-11"'54 - 7.lj. 866 71 ~ 39 l 0 243 117 21._ 63 0.2 o.o - 1m 352 19 ~ ~ ~ 0 MIi T.Iio 1.50 1.02 6-2,-57 - 7.7 550 4o 22
~ l 0
~ &; &t ~~6')
0.14 0.65 23 372 168 26
r.;g r:m o.6! 0
2- 6-58 - 7.5 351 10 21 22 l 0 22- 21
~ ~ 0.66 0, 28 240 113 _,o o.55 r.,s ~ o.ol 'li 1.15 o.43 9-29-56 - 7.lj. 9f8 - - - - 0 100 - ~ - ~- - - - 1'11
0 ~
2-16-59 63 7.2 64') 1:,o 2~ ~2 2 0
~ & ~ ¥.,a 0.1 o.~ 2') 513 235 28 ~ r.Bf o.os 0 •
.ll'PEJmIX B
HINERAL AJIALlSES or OROUtlD WATERS
IN THE VICINITY or GR0Vi1\ CITY'
(oant1Dlled)
1Toaper-1 I I f!!t.8 f!l' 1111Uon Pana l!:!r m.111on :
I &1;\&re I I 'fJ:rJ.fP I Oona'\ltllenta I I rfatiil : Tot&l. :Per- IA eqld.valenta per m.lllon I State wall I Date I vbetl I }ti l at I I I : clia- : hard- :oent l'IUllber , aampled iaampled: I 25o C t : : I I t : I I NO : f : B a s102 :aolveds nu• , Ha I °F : : C& t ~ : Na. t It : C03 : ~0.3 1 S04 1 Cl I 3 ' : : 1aol1da:{eaco:i}:
32S/l.3E-32Al ,-22-5, 68 7.6 654 ~ 22 44 2 0 102 l21f &, no o.06 0.29 26 451 n6 30 (oontinued) ~ r.Ji5 0.05 0 Tl'&' T.58
2-~o 67 7.2 ~, 58 2'/ lf8 l 0 71 ~ 51 88 o., o.o ~ lf8o 25, 2,
2.89 T.ll 2.0, o.o, 0 ~ ,. I:1ili T:li!
,-2~0 - 7.0 8'l2
~ ~ 44 / 2 0 ¥.b ~ P.ss· 50 ' 0 0.05 12 724 211 23
l.~ o;6°5 1i o:ur ---- -,...,
tJ )- 2~1 - 6.8 750 6lf
~ 42 2 0
~ l?O 56 ~ 0 0.15 2, 558 2~ 2il
I ;:m DJs o.oTi 'ti ~ ~ r.tRJ
:0
-.32D2 ,-1,-54 'l'J 7.6 813 ~ 38 28 2 0 ~ 111 2L ~ 0.2 o.o - 4~ Y/6 15
3.16 1.)2 0.05 0 5.1 2.32 1.11 0 • .38
-.32D4 12-,i-5, - 7.7 823 86
~ .30 2 0 281 112 44
~ o.4 o.o, " 526 '!IO 15
4.,o l:Ji o.(i; 0 ~ 2.,, 1.25
-.32Hl ,-5-51 6lf 8.2 1,.410 160
~ & 2 0 418 i~~ ~ .2L o., o.o, 21 '1/2 712 14
MR 0.05 0 r.85 1.,s 1.20
6-2,-57 - 7.7 1,~,
~ &, f.q; 2 0
~ ~ ~ 82 0.22 0.50 22 1,.0,2 680 15
o;m 1} ~
,-29-58 - 7.6 1,.317 r.L &a ~ 2 0
~ 260 ~ 126 0.5 0.14 30 '75 6;. 15
0.05 0 5-U; 2.03
2-16-5!1 - 7.4 l,'15 ~ ~ 48 2 0 ~ ~ 66 110 0.3 o.04 .31 1,04.3 ?15 1.3 m o.?R 'ii 1.85 r.'fi
,-22-59 65 7.0 1,567 ~ 82 &s 2 0 422 t.1o 61 fil.. o.1f2 o.;. 26 1,146 766 14 r.'i'i o.or 0 6.,i r:,! 2.01
··:.;·,:..:,.-~-;-,._:~~~ .. ;.~::.-•-~ :.,,._~f.\,,, :'.~..l.~. :~l r .;_,\,t-::~¾ ~ .. *.:,~lf .. ': ~-,. <.' 'o' ":,, 1 •, I .. .. r,~ - ........ _ __,, _____________ _
APPINDIX B
MINDU.L ANALYSES or GllOOHD WATmS
IN T1S VICINITY or C20YF.R CITY
(oontlm&ed)
:Temper-: : : Pai-ta per aiiIUon
: ature: l ilCxlo6 l Con1t1 tuents 1n parts e!r million : I I :Total : total ,P_ State well : Dde , wan : Iii t &t l equlvalenta per m1li1vn : I : dis-- 1 hard- :oent number : aampled :sampled: 1 25°- C I Ca. I ffg J Na I I: l CO I Jl:0 I s~ ~ Cl l I F : B : Sl~ :solved: nesa , Na op l I 1 : l l : ) : _3 I N03 : ; r ssol1da: !cac23~:
32S/1JE-J2Hl 10- 6-60 72 7.4 1,.355 ~ ~ &, 1 0
~ ~ &; ~ 0.5 0.05 22 1,022 591J 17
(oontinued) ~ 0
-32L2 11-11-50 - 7.5 1~010 116
~ ~ 2 - ~ ~ 1L L - 0.01 '' 653 516 1.3
5.7, 0.05 .3 l o.,, 0.05
-J.3Fl 10-21-5.3 62 8.4 1,106 136 68 116 l - 1164 231 1L 6 0.3 0.12 - 821 622 14 r.!5 5.6, 2.00 0.02 7-bO TC'S2 1.00 0.0j
lJ
l
0 "---~......,-. -
t,.~-~·- iliit\\·~-;1!~ - .. ~~,..-4-f,' ~ .. -...... -~ e. · .. Pfe-·:.~t·· ~~~) .. ~*1~~~3~~~1¥.~ =!II~ l!t'i!J&~ '$"',affl.¥.-.,;~™ ~ ..,," ·l ... ~ r·
~ .....
1femper-1 I t
: ature 1 I ECzl"' I
Da.te I when : ~ . . &t I
aaaplecl 1aampled: t 25° C I Ca t
Op ' : ' t
l~l~5!1a 71 1., 1,201
~ ,-12-6ob 76 7.1+ 1,680 4i.
m
~ per llillion
I ~ eldahl N: POa+ l
&.
b.
31 0.2 .. 11
41 15
--~·
'""' ''-- ,..
APFlll>IX C
MDmW, ANALlSiS or EP1LUEN!
ARROYO OIWIDE SEWAGE TREATIENI' PLANI'
Paris 2!!: llibion l
Con1tUuent.1 1n pu'W P8I" llilllon t I I tTote.l t Total tPer- equ1nl.enu par llilllon I t I I dia~ I mrd- IOent : I 1 CO I lllO : soi. : c1 . I , I B a s102 1aolncl1 nue r Na ~ Na I . N03 t r : : ' : ' : I : 1 :aolichu (caco3)t ~ ¥.to ~~32
0 ~ 164
0 'Pi! ¥.u 0
0 O.?l o.lt6 - ,a.a 3'8 "
& m.. 16 0
~ a t& 0 0 o.lJ 26 '//6 ))5 5,
10.30 o.41 0 0
.. ·~ .
--- -• ····-·---------------- --------------
Agenda Item No. 8
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council DATE: February 13, 2024 FROM: Matthew Bronson, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Nick Szamet, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review and General Fund Forecast
RECOMMENDATION
Receive FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review including the updated General Fund Financial Forecast; approve mid-year budget augmentations; and provide input and direction to staff.
BACKGROUND
Consistent with the Council’s adopted financial policies, this report provides an update on the City’s financial condition for FY 2023-24 and financial projections over the next five years. The forecast uses current budget data and economic indicators from national and local sources to establish projections for revenue and expenditure as well as illuminate any long-term challenges in balancing council priorities with available resources. Present economic uncertainties include ongoing but moderating inflation, continued uncertainty in cannabis tax revenues, pending employee labor negotiations, and changes to interest rates affecting the costs of financing.
FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Financial Report
The General Fund is the City’s primary fund with taxes and major user fees funding basic public services. The Council adopted a FY 2023-24 General Fund budget of $18.1 million as included in Table 1.
Table 1
FY2023-24
GF Summary Budget Projected
Beginning Reserves 5,053,965 5,053,965
Revenues/Transfers In 19,434,800 19,288,000
Expenditures/Transfers Out 18,170,000 18,162,000
Surplus/(Deficit) 1,264,800 1,126,000
Ending Reserves 6,318,765 6,179,965
Reserves as Percent of Operating 39% 38%
Does not include midyear requests.
Staff Report: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review and General Fund Forecast Page 2 February 13, 2024
General Fund Revenues
For FY 2023-24, the City’s top five revenues (sales tax, property tax, cannabis tax, service charges, and transient occupancy tax) comprise 81% of total revenue, excluding transfers and one-time grant funds. Total General Fund revenues are projected to end the fiscal year at approximately $18.7 million compared to $19.2 million budgeted. Revenues are buoyed by a healthy increase of 4% in property tax revenues. However, sales taxes generated by businesses in the city are lower than previously projected, and there are downward revisions to intergovernmental revenues as well as cannabis tax revenues. Projections are determined by historical trends, revenue received in the current year, anticipated business growth, as well as consulting with experts.
The diverse revenue make-up of the city has reinforced its financial position in a period of high uncertainty and volatility. During the COVID-19 pandemic, cannabis tax revenues hit the highest level reported. However, in FY 2022-23 this lowered to roughly $1.2 million or 20% less than the prior year. Staff anticipates similar revenues in the current year and has adjusted projections to compensate. Although sales tax has been a major driver of revenue growth for the last several years, increases are plateauing, and minor gains are largely a result of inflation. However, inflation has remained persistent while moderating in pace. This has led City staff to project slightly higher sales tax revenues than budgeted by 2%.
Table 2 highlights the General Fund’s top five revenues for the FY 2023-24 budget compared to projected revenue at year-end. As shown in the table below, total revenues are anticipated to be slightly higher than budget by approximately $202,000.
Table 2
Budget Projected Over/(Under) Percent of
Budget
1 Sales Tax
6,144,000
6,257,000 113,000 102%
2 Property Tax
5,720,000 5,949,000
229,000 104%
3 Cannabis Tax
1,326,000 1,200,000
(126,000) 90%
4 Service
Charges 985,000
953,000 (32,000) 97%
5 Transient
Occupancy
Tax
900,000
918,000 18,000 102%
Totals 15,075,000 15,277,000 202,000 101%
• Sales Tax, as noted above, is estimated to be higher by approximately 2% compared to the FY 2023-24 budgeted amount. This is mostly due to the strength pooled sales tax revenue which is collected by the County of San Luis Obispo and distributed by the amount apportionable to the jurisdictions. Pooled sales tax figures have done better due to inclusion of major online retailers and vehicle sales which are placed into the pool. For the quarter ending June 30, 2023, Grover Beach showed healthy growth of 9.2% in distributions from the countywide pool from the preceding quarter. However, those portions of sales tax which are not pooled (businesses within the city) show business activity is down across four out of five sectors. The notable exception is business to business which has seen gains of 21%. Overall, business activity is down 3.6% from the prior year for non-pooled sales tax revenues.
Staff Report: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review and General Fund Forecast Page 3 February 13, 2024
• Property Tax continues to be a consistent revenue source and is estimated to be on track with budget. The County of San Luis Obispo has estimated a 4% increase in property tax revenue from the prior year, which falls in line with the City’s budgeted numbers. If interest rates continue to fall, it is likely additional homes will be sold. Countywide, the Case-Schiller Index shows a nearly 6% jump in housing price index year-over-year. This increase in housing prices is also seen in Grover Beach where the median sales price of a house was $840,000 in December 2023 which was 10% higher than the previous year. • Cannabis Tax is estimated to be 10% lower than budgeted. This number is based on revenues received through the quarter ending December 31, 2023, along with expectations for activity in the second half of the fiscal year. There are continued challenges facing the industry including the strength of the illicit market, degree of State taxation and regulations, and competition from businesses in other cities.
• Charges for Services are projected to be $32,000 lower than budgeted. This is likely resulting from the slowdown in the larger cannabis industry as a larger part of the Service Charges are composed of cannabis regulatory fees.
• Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) is estimated to be $18,000 higher than budgeted. The increase is primarily due to costs for lodgings which remain strong even with a limited number of units within the City.
General Fund Expenditures
Table 3 below shows that overall General Fund expenditures are projected to end the year over the budget by $134,000. The projected budget is based on the most current data and historical trends and could change with six months remaining in the fiscal year.
Table 3
Budget Projected Variance
Salaries and Benefits 9,103,000 9,103,000 -
Supplies and Services 7,215,000 7,215,000 -
Minor Capital 85,000 85,000 -
Debt Service 34,000 168,000 (134,000)
CIP (Fund 11) Transfers Out 1,591,000 1,591,000 -
Total 18,028,000 18,162,000 (134,000)
The additional $134,000 estimated in debt service is for higher borrowing costs related leasing new vehicles for the Police and Public Works departments. Notwithstanding the increased costs related to leasing vehicles, there are additional midyear appropriations requests which are outlined further in this staff report.
Water Fund
Water Fund revenues, generated from charges for service, are aligned with budgeted amounts through February 2024. In the fall 2023, a rate study was undertaken to determine whether a new rate structure would be necessary to fund the City’s costs of providing water and wastewater services including needed capital improvement projects. The rate study determined that an increase in water fees was required for the City to obtain necessary funding for increased costs of operations and maintenance as well as capital projects. The rate structure was approved by Staff Report: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review and General Fund Forecast Page 4 February 13, 2024
the Council on December 11, 2023 with the first-year increases programmed into the City’s billing system and effective as of February 1. This increase will provide an additional $254,584 in revenue through the end of the fiscal year and close a budget gap this year with funds allocated to financing debt for capital projects and operations and maintenance expenses. Staff would note that a proposed citizen’s initiative to repeal the water and wastewater rate structure would result in the postponement or deferral of numerous water infrastructure projects shown in Attachment 1 to improve the City’s water system.
68% of the Water Fund budget has been expended to date in FY 2023-24, due to annual payments at the beginning of the fiscal year for liability insurance and routine operations and maintenance. Capital projects are still being completed or have not yet started. Overall, Water Fund expenditures are at budgeted levels for the second quarter except for major capital. As shown in Table 4, the fund will end the year with expending $1.67 million from reserves.
Table 4
Water Fund FY 2022-2023
Actuals
FY 2023-2024
Budget*
FY 2023-24
Year-to-Date
Revenue
Charges for Services 3,501,444 4,131,504 2,231,517
Misc. Income 137,405 169,000 27,735
Interest Income 151,132 76,300
Total 3,789,981 4,376,804 2,259,252
Expenditure
Operations and maintenance 3,359,926 3,738,190
Capital 298,743 2,308,623 75,675
Total 3,658,669 6,046,813 2,891,478
Surplus/(Deficit) 131,312 (1,670,009) (632,226)
*2023 Rate Study
Wastewater Fund
The Wastewater Fund is presently running at a deficit due to increasing costs related to wastewater operations and planned capital projects. As part of the same rate structure affecting water rates, the City increased sewer rates to provide additional revenues required for increases to operations and maintenance costs, and to increase the City’s debt capacity to finance the replacement of outdated infrastructure and for planned wastewater capital improvement projects also included in Attachment 1.
Those rates are expected to provide an additional $61,714 in revenue in FY 2023-24 helping to close the existing budget gap and to provide an additional financial hedge against increasing operations and maintenance costs and planned debt service requirements in years to come.
However, as with the Water Fund, the Wastewater Fund will run at a deficit of $950,000 paid from fund reserves. This was outlined in the rate study approved by Council. Similar to the Water Fund, staff would note that a proposed citizen’s initiative to repeal the water and wastewater rate structure would result in the postponement or deferral of numerous wastewater infrastructure projects to improve the City’s wastewater system. This includes a wastewater line upgrade project which was out to bid but put on hold given the uncertainty of the potential initiative which could affect the timing of future street repair projects and housing and other development projects.
Staff Report: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review and General Fund Forecast Page 5 February 13, 2024
Table 5
Wastewater Fund FY 2022-2023
Actuals
FY 2023-2024
Budget*
FY 2023-24
Year-to-Date
Revenue
Charges for Services 928,035 1,011,160 565,102
Misc. Income 302,727 409,126
Interest Income 88,278 74,984 0
Total 1,319,040 1,495,270 590,131
Expenditure
Operations and
Maintenance
1,401,670 1,450,526
Major Capital 136,650 4,594,748 2,520
Debt Proceeds 0 (3,600,000) 0
Total 1,538,320 2,445,274 736,765
Surplus/(Deficit) (219,280) (950,004) (146,634)
*2023 Rate Study
Carry-Over of Capital Project Funding and Authorized Appropriations Per Council’s adopted financial policies, any unused appropriations at the end of FY 2022-23 in active capital improvement projects and multi-year programs are re-appropriated for continued use in FY 2023-24. These carryovers include $2 million in the Capital Projects Fund, $307,700 in the Water Fund, and $2.14 million in the Wastewater Fund. A detailed listing is included in Attachment 2.
The financial policies also authorize any remaining balance of one-time authorized appropriations to be carried forward with the approval of the City Manager and Administrative Services Director.
Council previously approved the carryover of $324,782 in FY 2022-23 appropriations and costs that were not expended until FY 2023-24. The list of authorized one-time appropriations that will be carried over to FY 2023-24 for implementation this fiscal year using General Fund are also included in Attachment 2.
Requested Mid-Year Budget Appropriations and General Fund Impact With the fiscal year halfway completed, departments re-evaluated their current operations to identify any unforeseen needs that may need additional funding. Staff is requesting the Council’s approval of mid-year budget appropriation changes for the General Fund totaling $338,988 along with appropriations requested as shown in detail in Attachment 3 and in Table 6 below.
Staff Report: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review and General Fund Forecast Page 6 February 13, 2024
Table 6
Dept./Request
101 -
General
Fund
601 -
Water
Fund
603 –
Wastewa
ter Fund
City Manager's Office
Community Center Improvements 15,520
Salary Savings (15,520)
City Manager Total
0 Police Department
Dispatch Services 310,000
Police Officer Over-hire 61,000
PD Facilities (51 Newport Storage Facility) 120,000
PD Patrol Vehicle Computers 76,000
Salary Savings (257,000)
Total Police 310,000
Public Works
Hillcrest Water Tank Drainage Improvements 10,000 10,000 Storm Drain Inlet and Outlet Cleaning 30,000
Tire Balancing Machine 6,000
Valve Truck 22,988
Income Survey for Sewer Extension Grant 10,000
Total Public Works 28,988 10,000 50,000
Grand Total 338,988 10,000 50,000
Table 7 on the following page shows the General Fund impact of these recommended mid-year budget appropriations for FY 2023-24 along with the related changes in General Fund reserves from the carry-over of authorized appropriations. There is projected to be a slight variance of $280,800 from FY 2023-24 Budget to Projection and after adding in midyear, carryover, and wastewater fund repayment, the City will have ending reserves of nearly $5.7 million or 35% of operating expenditures.
Staff would note that a major driver of this year’s mid-year appropriations requests is the inclusion of one-time costs for the transfer of dispatch services from the Pismo Beach Police Department to the San Luis Obispo Sheriff’s Office after a determination that continuation of dispatch services provided by Pismo Beach would be prohibitive given a significant cost increase from proposed staffing and building costs. The Police Department is negotiating a multi-year agreement with the Staff Report: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review and General Fund Forecast Page 7 February 13, 2024
Sheriff’s Office to provide dispatch services at near the cost currently paid by the City for these services. This agreement will be brought to the Council for approval in March but to prepare for this transition to occur by July 2024, $310,000 in one-time funding for software and other technology equipment is needed now as a mid-year appropriation.
Table 7
General Fund Summary
FY 2023-
2024
Budget
FY 2023-
2024
Projection
Variance
Amount
Variance
Percent
of Budget
(A) (B) (B-A)
Revenues/Transfers In 19,434,800 19,288,000 -146,800 99.24% Expenditures/Transfers Out 18,028,000 18,162,000 134,000 100.74% Surplus/Deficit 1,406,800 1,126,000 -280,800 80.04%
Beginning Reserves 7,410,465 7,410,465 0 100.00%
FY2023 Carryover -2,356,500 -2,356,500 0 100.00%
Wastewater Fund Repayment -142,000 -142,000 0 100.00%
Midyear Requests -338,988 -338,988 100.00%
Ending Reserves 6,318,765 5,698,977 -619,788 95.30%
General Fund Financial Forecast
Economic Trends
The General Fund financial forecast is intended to be a tool which provides a rational forecast of where the City’s financial position will be in five years. Staff annually updates a five-year General Fund financial forecast to evaluate the City’s financial condition and help develop the City’s budget.
The consensus for national economic outlook predicts that federal reserve actions will determine the acceleration of the U.S. economy through 2024. Real GDP for the last quarter of 2023 grew at 4.9%. Compared with 2.9% for the entire year, last quarter’s growth is driven mainly by an increase in consumer spending, asset investments, and government expenditures. Overall, there is lingering uncertainty around inflation which remains at 3.3% year-over-year from December 2022 to December 2023. It should be noted that it was 6.5% in the preceding period of 2021 to 2022. Although interest rates are generally moderating, it is not clear if there will be major revisions based on comments from the Federal Reserve. Statewide, the unemployment rate was
5.1% in December 2023 (up from 4.1% in 2022 and down from 7.7% December 2021).
Based on the latest sales tax forecast ending September 30, 2023, statewide taxable sales down by 3.2% overall compared with the previous year and the Central Coast seeing a slightly smaller decline of 1.4%. Revenue of Autos & Transportation sales tax revenue is up 2.7% year-over-year, and nearly 10% in the last quarter alone. This is likely due to the opening of a new Tesla dealership in the county as well as other new vehicle sales driving sector revenue growth in the local economy. Fuel & Service Stations are up 1.9% from prior year though overall fuel prices have been steadily coming down. In addition, continuing expansion of the electric vehicle market impacts consumption of fuel; electric vehicles accounted for 21.5% of all new vehicles sales in the state for the year ending September 2023. This has created higher sales tax revenues for revenues collected and distributed from the countywide pool versus those collected on a districtwide basis (i.e. Grover Beach) as noted earlier in the report. Therefore, the conservative Staff Report: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review and General Fund Forecast Page 8 February 13, 2024
approach taken in this forecast has limited growth in the near term to 2% with steady incremental increases over the five-year forecast horizon.
Statewide, housing sales are expected to jump by 22% in 2024 with analysts factoring in declining mortgage rates. This trend is also seen locally with construction up 26% for the quarter ending September 2023. Drug Stores, including cannabis, had continued declines of 15% from the same period last year. These restrained levels are expected to hold for the foreseeable future not counting any additional business expansion.
City’s Five-Year Forecast
Grover Beach has weathered a challenging business climate due to the diversified tax base in the city. Although there are declines in particular revenues like cannabis, the ability of the City to weather such circumstances and maintain a healthy tax base should be noted as a bullwork against any one single point of failure or a catastrophic situation. Sales tax revenues have decreased slightly in recent months, but this is inevitable in the face of declining inflation.
Ultimately, such declines are often mitigated by the increases in other revenue sources. For instance, property taxes are counter cyclical to a high inflation environment, so when high inflation abates, interest rates will also fall creating higher value to homeowners and greater tax revenues to the City as well as relieving pressure on those unwilling to refinance in a high-rate environment.
This means more revenue through property development and existing home sales.
Although the City still faces significant needs for services and capital improvements, it remains in a strong financial position with reserves over the Council’s 25% goal to meet unforeseen needs.
Also, it is important to note that the pension cost calculated in this forecast uses the latest actuarial report issued in June 2023 and through June 30, 2022, which reflects -6.1% investment loss that was reported by CalPERS for the fiscal year ending June 20, 2022. Such losses are driving significant increases to the City’s unfunded accrued liability (UAL) determined by CalPERS.
Table 8 below shows a summary of this updated five-year forecast with a more detailed version shown in Attachment 4.
Table 8
Overall, the forecast indicates the General Fund is in a positive position over the five-year period though with a small projected surplus in future years with strong reserves. The City forecasts moderate revenue growth and has taken steps to maintain healthy reserves considering the ongoing uncertainties in the national economic picture. Below are some points regarding major revenue sources and guiding assumptions around the forecast:
• Sales Tax. This year’s forecast assumes that general sales tax revenues will increase less than 2% in the current fiscal year but return to a more consistent growth level of 3% in the following fiscal years 2025-29. Significant increases in revenue in prior years have leveled off 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29
General Fund Budget Projected Budget Revised Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenues 19,435,000 19,288,000 18,481,000 18,876,000 19,802,000 20,522,000 21,239,000 21,913,000 Total Expenditures 18,028,000 18,162,000 18,761,600 18,765,000 19,404,000 20,147,000 20,805,000 21,268,000 Annual Surplus /(Deficit) 1,407,000 1,126,000 (280,600) 111,000 398,000 375,000 434,000 645,000 Beginning Reserves 5,054,000 5,054,000 5,699,012 5,699,012 5,659,506 5,915,506 6,112,506 6,368,506 Ending Reserves 6,319,000 5,699,012 5,276,412 5,659,506 5,915,506 6,112,506 6,368,506 6,835,506 Reserve as percent of operating. 39% 35% 31% 33% 33% 33% 34% 35% FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Staff Report: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review and General Fund Forecast Page 9 February 13, 2024
with the reduction in inflation and fiscal stimulus. However, the overall health of the economy and increases in personal income, which has outpaced inflation, have provided some hedge against larger declines.
• Property Tax. Using the County’s revenue estimates, this year’s forecast assumes that the City’s property tax revenues will increase by 4% year-over-year. 4% percent has been consistent over the last 10 years and was provided by SLO County Assessor as expected growth in property rolls. Fiscal years 2024-25 and beyond also assume consistent growth of 4% per year.
• Cannabis Tax. The forecast revises cannabis tax revenue down from $1.32 million for FY 2023-24, to $1.2 million or a 10% decrease from what was budgeted, albeit a slight increase from in FY 2022-23. This forecast takes a conservative approach estimating additional revenues in an incremental approach as fiscal years 2025-28 assume limited growth of 2% per year from the FY 2023-24 revised base of $1.2 million. • Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT). In FY 2022-23 TOT revenues were $925,000, or $125,000 over the budgeted $750,000. This is mainly due to the recovery from the pandemic along with the collection of TOT revenue for permitted short-term rentals. TOT is projected to increase 2% in FY 2023-24 and 3% each year beginning FY 2024-25. The forecast includes TOT for a future hotel project anticipated to be completed in FY 2024-25.
FISCAL IMPACT
The appropriations requested for the current FY 2023-24 midyear budget total $338,988 for the General Fund, $28,988 for the Water Fund, and $50,000 for the Wastewater Fund. Total FY 2022- 23 carryover of special one-time authorized General Fund appropriations total $324,782. CIP project carryovers from FY 2022-23 total $2,031,691 for the General Fund via reserves. Water and Wastewater appropriations will be paid from respective fund reserves at $307,700 and $2,149,018 each.
ALTERNATIVES
The Council has the following alternatives to consider:
1. Receive the FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review including the updated General Fund Financial Forecast; approve mid-year budget augmentations; and provide input and direction to staff; or
2. Do not approve mid-year appropriation requests; or
3. Provide staff with alternate direction.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
The agenda was posted in accordance with the Brown Act.
Staff Report: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review and General Fund Forecast Page 10 February 13, 2024
Attachments
1. Water and Wastewater CIP
2. FY 2022-23 CIP Carryover to FY 2023-24
2. Mid-Year Appropriation Requests
3. General Fund Five Year Financial Forecast
Attachment 1
Water Fund - 601 FY 23-24 FY 24-25 FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 Total Central Coast Blue $2,528,400 $19,676,777 $0 $0 $0 $22,205,177 Water Main Zone Valves 75,000 $75,000
Well Capacity Analysis Improvements 75,000 $75,000
16th Street Booster Station 180,000 780,000 $960,000
Water Meter Replacement Meter Program 300,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 $900,000 Automated Meter Reading 300,000 $300,000
Reservoir Maintenance 1,577,700 $1,577,700
Total Water CIP $4,556,100 $20,006,777 $930,000 $150,000 $450,000 $26,092,877 Wastewater Fund - 603 FY 23-24 FY 24-25 FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 Total Sewer Upgrade for Existing and Future Flows $3,600,000 $3,600,000 Front Street Lift Station Upgrades 144,748 $144,748
South Oak Park Lift Station Upgrades 150,000 $150,000
Sewer Upgrade for Existing Flows 400 3,100 $3,500
Replace Portion of Damaged Strom Drain 140,000 $140,000 Citywide Sewer Lining Project 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 $500,000 Total $4,394,748 $240,000 $100,000 $100,000 $3,200,000 $8,034,748 Water and Wastewater CIP
Attachment 2
FY2023-2024 Carryover 2/9/2024
Capital Projects
Project Description Amount
2004 Train Station Stormwater Alt Compliance 30,000
2278 North 12th Street Sidewalk 9,189
2283 Local Street Rehabilitation Program 50,744
2287 Major Streets: West Grand Ave Streetscape 1,673,960 3002 City Corp Yard Improvements 100,000
3004 Facilities Conditions and Needs Assessment 138,464 Asset Management System 29,333
2,031,691
603 Wastewater
Project Description Amount
5002 Sewer System Upgrades for Existing Flows 1,867,052 5003 Front Street Lift Station Upgrades 81,966
5010 Sewer Upgrade for Existing Flows 200,000
2,149,018
601 Water
Project Description Amount
4007 Water Main Zone Valves 50,000
4008 Well Capacity Analysis and Improvements 75,000
4270 Water Meter Replacement Program 150,000
4391 Reservoir Maintenance Program 32,700
307,700
Department Name Amount
Administrative
Services
Department
Services - Annual Maintenance Agreement for IT
back-up storage and rooftop cable access.
Equipment Purchase Carryover for server and
networking costs. 83,542
Community
Development
Department
Contractual Obligations Community Development
carryover $60k circulation element, $60k noise
element for general plan updates. 100,989
Public Works Contract for electronic filing agreement. 5,000 Police Department Carryover for remainder van acquisition costs. 135,251 Total 324,782
Non-CIP
General Fund Five Year Forecast Attachment 3
2022-2023
Total Activity
2023-2024
Budget
2023-2024
Revised
2024-2025
Budget 2024-2025 Revised 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029
REVENUES
Property Tax 5,547,000 5,720,000 5,949,000 5,876,000 6,187,000 6,434,000 6,691,000 6,959,000 7,237,000 Sales Tax
General: 1% 2,094,000 2,167,000 2,194,000 2,226,000 2,255,000 2,302,000 2,346,000 2,387,000 2,425,000 Measure X: 1/2% 1,336,000 1,274,000 1,302,000 1,309,000 1,343,000 1,418,000 1,508,000 1,593,000 1,672,000 Measure F-20: 1% 2,452,000 2,587,000 2,644,000 2,657,000 2,727,000 2,878,000 3,061,000 3,234,000 3,395,000 State Sales Tax - Public Safety 111,000 116,000 117,000 120,000 120,000 123,000 125,000 127,000 129,000 Transient Occupancy Tax 924,000 900,000 918,000 927,000 946,000 974,000 1,003,000 1,033,000 1,064,000 TOT-est 950 El Camino - - - - 185,000 408,000 416,000 424,000 424,000 Utility Users Tax 206,000 206,000 210,000 193,000 214,000 218,000 222,000 226,000 231,000 Cannabis Tax 1,198,000 1,326,000 1,200,000 1,353,000 1,224,000 1,248,000 1,273,000 1,298,000 1,298,000 Business Tax 157,000 163,000 166,000 166,000 169,000 174,000 179,000 184,000 190,000 Other Taxes - - - - - -
Franchise Fees 704,447 735,000 750,000 948,000 750,000 765,000 780,000 796,000 812,000 Fiber Optic Cable (4 @ $100K) - 100,000 100,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 Total Taxes and Franchises 14,729,447 15,294,000 15,550,000 16,075,000 16,420,000 17,242,000 17,904,000 18,561,000 19,177,000 From Other Governments 832,000 1,015,000 573,000 70,000 70,000 53,000 55,000 57,000 57,000 Licenses and Permits 424,554 223,000 227,000 229,000 232,000 237,000 242,000 247,000 252,000 Service Charges 953,000 985,000 953,000 1,008,000 972,000 1,028,000 1,049,000 1,070,000 1,091,000 Use of Money and Property 255,000 341,000 260,000 344,000 265,000 270,000 275,000 281,000 287,000 Total Revenues 17,194,001 17,858,000 17,563,000 17,726,000 17,959,000 18,830,000 19,525,000 20,216,000 20,864,000
EXPENDITURES
Operating Programs
Salaries and Benefits 8,536,000 9,103,000 9,103,000 9,581,000 9,868,000 10,164,000 10,469,000 10,783,000 11,106,000 Supplies and Services 6,229,000 7,215,000 7,215,000 7,284,000 7,430,000 7,653,000 7,959,000 8,158,000 8,321,000 Minor Capital 667,204 85,000 85,000 -
Total Operating Programs 15,432,204 16,403,000 16,403,000 16,865,000 17,298,000 17,817,000 18,428,000 18,941,000 19,427,000 Interdepartmental Charge 1 - -
Other 75 - -
Major Capital - - -
Debt Service 154,000 34,000 168,000 296,600 267,000 267,000 267,000 267,000 241,000 CIP (Fund 11) Transfers Out 387,000 1,591,000 1,591,000 1,600,000 1,200,000 1,320,000 1,452,000 1,597,000 1,600,000 Total Expenditures 15,973,204 18,028,000 18,162,000 18,761,600 18,765,000 19,404,000 20,147,000 20,805,000 21,268,000
OTHER SOURCES & USES
Cost Allocation Transfers 515,000 532,000 532,000 548,000 564,000 581,000 598,000 616,000 634,000 Other Transfers In 31,000 67,800 240,000 70,000 247,000 254,000 262,000 270,000 278,000 Replacement Fund 137,000 137,000 137,000 137,000 137,000 137,000 137,000 137,000 Long-Term Debt Issued (Proceeds) 840,000 840,000
Transfer Out Rate Increase Contribution (24,000) (30,700) Total Sources and Uses 546,000 1,576,800 1,725,000 755,000 917,300 972,000 997,000 1,023,000 1,049,000 Sources Over (Under) Uses 1,766,797 1,406,800 1,126,000 (280,600) 111,300 398,000 375,000 434,000 645,000 Reserves, Start of Year 5,785,668 5,053,965 5,053,965 5,698,977 5,698,977 5,659,771 5,915,771 6,112,771 6,368,771 End of Year 7,552,465 6,460,765 6,179,965 5,418,377 5,810,277 6,057,771 6,290,771 6,546,771 7,013,771 Wastewater Fund Repayment (142,000) (142,000) (142,000) (142,000) (142,000) (142,000) (178,000) (178,000) (178,000) CIP & Other Carryover (2,356,500)
Midyear Budget Adjustments (338,988) (8,506)
RESERVES, EOY 5,053,965 6,318,765 5,698,977 5,276,377 5,659,771 5,915,771 6,112,771 6,368,771 6,835,771 Reserve as Percent of Operating Programs 33% 39% 35% 31% 33% 33% 33% 34% 35% Attachment 4
Budget Adjustments FY2023-24 Midyear
2/9/2024
Fund Fund Name Department Name FiscalYear Amount
101 101 - General Fund City Manager's Office Community Center Improvements 2023-2024 Revised 15,520 101 101 - General Fund City Manager's Office Salary Savings 2023-2024 Revised (15,520) 101 101 - General Fund Police Department PD Facilities (45 Newport) 2023-2024 Revised 120,000 101 101 - General Fund Police Department PD Patrol Vehicle Computers 2023-2024 Revised 76,000 101 101 - General Fund Police Department Overhire 2023-2024 Revised 61,000 101 101 - General Fund Police Department Dispatch Services Software and Tech. Equipment 2023-2024 Revised 310,000 101 101 - General Fund Police Department Salary Savings 2023-2024 Revised (257,000) 101 101 - General Fund Public Works Valve Truck 2023-2024 Revised 22,988 101 101 - General Fund Public Works Tire Balancing Machine 2023-2024 Revised 6,000 601 601 - Water Fund Public Works Hillcrest Water Tank Drainage Improvements 2023-2024 Revised 10,000 603 603 - Wastewater Public Works Storm Drain Inlet and Outlet Cleaning 2023-2024 Revised 30,000 603 603 - Wastewater Public Works Hillcrest Water Tank Drainage Improvements 2023-2024 Revised 10,000 603 603 - Wastewater Public Works Income Survey 2023-2024 Revised 10,000 Total 398,988
FY24
General Fund 338,988
Water Fund 10,000
Wastewater Fund 50,000
1 RESOLUTION NO. 24-____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GROVER BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY WHEREAS, Article 5, Chapter 3, section 5034(A)(1) of the Grover Beach Municipal Code (“Code”) authorizes the Director of Emergency Services to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a local emergency when the City of Grover Beach (“City”) is affected or likely to be affected by an “emergency” as defined in section 5301 of the Code and the City Council is not in session, subject to ratification by the City Council; and, WHEREAS, Conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property have arisen within the City, caused by an EF-1 Tornado, on the 7th day of February, 2024, at which time the City Council of the City of Grover Beach was not in session; and, WHEREAS, The City Council hereby finds that the above conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property warranted and necessitated the proclamation of the existence of a local emergency; and,
WHEREAS, The Director of Emergency Services proclaimed the existence of a local emergency within the City on the 8th day of February, 2024, a true and correct copy of which is attached as Exhibit A.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the local emergency referenced above is hereby confirmed and shall be deemed to continue to exist until its termination is proclaimed by the City Council of the City of Grover Beach, State of California.
On motion by ________________, second by ________________, and on the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members –
NOES: Council Members –
ABSENT: Council Members –
ABSTAIN: Council Members –
RECUSED: Council Members –
The foregoing Resolution was PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Grover Beach, California this 13th day of February 2024. _________________________
KAREN BRIGHT, MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________
WENDI B. SIMS, CITY CLERK
**DRAFT**
Agenda Item No. 9
1 DECLARATION PROCLAIMING THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY
CITY OF GROVER BEACH
February 8, 2024
WHEREAS, Section 8630 of the Government Code and Article 5, Chapter 3, section 5034(A)(1) of the Grover Beach Municipal Code authorize the City Manager, acting as the Director of Emergency Services, to proclaim the existence of a local emergency when the existence or threatened existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons or property exist within the City, subject to ratification by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, Grover Beach Municipal Code Section 5301 defines “emergency” as the “actual or threatened existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons or property within the City caused by such conditions as . . . fire, flood, . . . storms, or other conditions. . .”; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Emergency Services of the City of Grover Beach, does hereby find as follows:
1. Threatened existence of conditions of extreme peril to the health and safety of persons in Grover Beach are present as a result of the EF-1 Tornado that struck the city on February 7, 2024; and
2. The National Weather Service damage assessment team responded to Grover Beach on February 8, 2024 and determined the damage sustained to many buildings and city infrastructure was in fact caused by an EF-1 Tornado; and
3. On February 4, 2024, California Governor Gavin Newsom declared a State of Emergency in several California counties, including San Luis Obispo, for early February storms to make additional resources available and formalize emergency actions already underway across multiple local, county and state agencies; and
4. The declaration of a local emergency will assist in a coordinated public agency response to the damage and recovery from said damage, provide assistance to community members that were impacted by the Tornado, coordinate and mitigate public services that may be disrupted from this emergency, and mitigate any other effects of this emergency on the citizens of the City of Grover Beach; and
5. That this emergency does not permit a delay resulting from a competitive solicitation to let contracts for bids, and immediate action is necessary to respond to the emergency.
WHEREAS, the City Council is not in session as of the date of this proclamation; and
WHEREAS, the aforesaid conditions of extreme peril warrant and necessitate the proclamation of the existence of a local emergency and immediate action is necessary to mitigate public calamity and the other effects of the local emergency.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Manager/Director of Emergency Services of the City of Grover Beach does hereby proclaim:
1. That a local emergency now exists throughout the City of Grover Beach.
2. During the existence of this local emergency, the powers, functions, and duties of the City Manager/Director of Emergency Services shall be those prescribed by state law, ordinances and resolutions of the City, and all other rules or regulations for mitigating the effects of the local emergency, including:
a. Control and direct the City efforts to manage the emergency; Exhibit A
2 b. Represent the City in all dealings with public or private agencies on matters pertaining to the emergency;
c. Make and issue rules and regulations on matters reasonably related to the protection of life and/or property as affected by the emergency; and d. Obtain supplies, equipment, and other properties not readily available but immediately needed for the protection of life or property.
3. This local emergency may be modified or terminated by the City Manager/Director of Emergency Services until ratification of this declaration by City Council.
4. The need for continuing this local emergency shall be reviewed as required by Government Code section 8630, and the City Council shall proclaim the termination of this local emergency at the earliest possible date that conditions warrant.
February 8, 2024
_Matthew Bronson
MATTHEW BRONSON
City Manager / Director of Emergency Services
Signature:
Email: [email protected]
Matthew Bronson (Feb 8, 2024 16:30 PST)