Guadalupe City Council
July 9, 2024

July 9, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Agenda Page 1 of 4 City of Guadalupe
AGENDA
Regular Meeting of the Guadalupe City Council
Tuesday, July 9, 2024, at 6:00 pm
City Hall, 918 Obispo Street, Council Chambers
The City Council meeting will broadcast live streamed on the City of Guadalupe’s Official YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaxeHWd9JkmvKnGFU8BAYQQ If you choose not to attend the City Council meeting but wish to make a comment during Community Participation Forum or on a specific agenda item, please submit via email to [email protected] no later than 2:00 pm on Tuesday, July 9, 2024.

Please be advised that, pursuant to State Law, any member of the public may address the City Council concerning any item on the Agenda, before or during Council consideration of that item. If you wish to speak on any item on the agenda, including any item on the Consent Calendar or the Ceremonial Calendar, please submit a speaker request form for that item. If you wish to speak on a matter that is not on the agenda, please do so during the Community Participation Forum.

The Agenda and related Staff reports are available on the City’s website: www.cityofguadalupe.org Friday before Council meeting.

Any documents produced by the City and distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available the Friday before Council meetings at the Administration Office at City Hall 918 Obispo Street, Monday through Friday between 8:00 am and 4:30 pm, and also posted 72 hours prior to the meeting. The City may charge customary photocopying charges for copies of such documents. Any documents distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda less than 72 hours before the meeting will be made available for inspection at the meeting and will be posted on the City’s website and made available for inspection the day after the meeting at the Administrator Office at City Hall 918 Obispo Street, Monday through Friday between 8:00 am and 4:30 pm.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, including review of the Agenda and related documents, please contact the Administration Office at (805) 356.3891 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. This will allow time for the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the meeting.

1. ROLL CALL:

Council Member Christina Hernandez
Council Member Gilbert Robles
Council Member Whitney Furness
Mayor Pro Tempore Eugene Costa Jr.

Mayor Ariston Julian

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
July 9, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Agenda Page 2 of 4

3. MOMENT OF THANKS, APPRECIATION OR CONDOLENCES.

4. AGENDA REVIEW
At this time the City Council will review the order of business to be conducted and receive requests for, or make announcements regarding, any change(s) in the order of business.

5. CEREMONIAL CALENDAR
• Oath of Office – Luis Ramos, Paid Call Firefighter

6. PRESENTATIONS
• Central Coast Community Energy (3CE) Annual Update – Judith Young

7. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION FORUM
Each person will be limited to a discussion of three (3) minutes or as directed by the Mayor.

Pursuant to the provisions of the Brown Act, no action may be taken on these matters unless they are listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. City Council may direct staff to investigate and/or schedule certain matters for consideration at a future City Council meeting.

8. CONSENT CALENDAR (A-H)
The following items are presented for City Council approval without discussion as a single agenda item in order to expedite the meeting. Should a Council Member wish to discuss or disapprove an item, it must be dropped from the blanket motion of approval and considered as a separate item.

A. Waive the reading in full of all Ordinances and Resolutions. Ordinances on the Consent Calendar will be adopted by the same vote cast as the first meeting unless City Council indicates otherwise.

B. Approve payment of warrants for the period ending June 26, 2024.

C. Approve the Minutes of the City Council special meeting of June 18, 2024.

D. Approve the Minutes of the City Council regular meeting of June 25, 2024 E. Approve the Annual Fiestas Patrias Celebration in Guadalupe to be held on Sunday, September 15, 2024.

F. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-41 approving a Cooperative Agreement with SBCAG to receive funding from Measure A for the 11th Street Safe Routes to School Project and authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement on behalf of the City.

G. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-42 initiating proceedings for the annual levy of assessments for the Pasadera Landscape and Lighting District for fiscal year 2024-2025; and adopt Resolution No. 2024-43 approving the Engineer’s Report for the Pasadera Landscape and Lighting District and declaring the City Council intent to levy assessments.

July 9, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Agenda Page 3 of 4 H. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-44 directing staff to forward to the Auditor-Controller’s Office of the County of Santa Barbara the Water Standby Charges for vacant parcels within the City of Guadalupe for fiscal year 2024-2025.

MANAGEMENT REPORTS

9. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT: (Information Only)
A. Planning Department report for June 2024
B. Building Department report for June 2024
C. City Engineer’s report for June 2024

10. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT: (Information Only)

11. RECREATION SERVICES MANAGER: (Information Only)
A. Recreation & Parks report for June 2024

PUBLIC HEARING

12. Guadalupe Benefit Assessment District No. 1 (FY 2024-25).

Written report: Jeff van den Eikhof, City Engineer
Recommendation: That the City Council conduct a public hearing to provide all present with an opportunity to speak regarding the assessment for the Guadalupe Benefit District No. 1 and adopt Resolution No. 2024-45 setting the proposed assessment.

13. Guadalupe Lighting District (FY 2024-25).

Written report: Jeff van den Eikhof, City Engineer
Recommendation: That the City Council conduct a public hearing to provide all present with an opportunity to speak regarding the assessment for the Guadalupe Lighting District and adopt Resolution No. 2024-46 setting the proposed assessment.

14. Completion and Close-Out of CDBG-Economic Development- Programs (2019): City of Guadalupe Microenterprise Assistance Program.

Written report: Janice Davis, Finance Director
Recommendation: That the City Council conduct a public hearing to provide all present with an opportunity to speak on the completion and close-out of CDBG Economic Development and adopt Resolution No. 2024-47 approving the completion and closeout reports for the City of Guadalupe CDBG Micro-enterprise Assistance Program as required by the Community Development Block Grant.

July 9, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Agenda Page 4 of 4

15. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

16. ANNOUNCEMENTS – COUNCIL ACTIVITY/COMMITTEE REPORTS

17. ADJOURNMENT
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda was posted on the City Hall display case and website not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Dated this 3rd day of June 2024.
______________________________
Todd Bodem, City Administrator

PROPOSED FUTURE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
Council Meeting: Date and Subject Department Agenda Category Tuesday, July 23, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. / Regular Meeting
Cost Allocation Plan FY 23-24 Finance Department Consent Calendar Pasadera LLD City Engineer’s Dept. Public Hearing
Tuesday, August 13, 2024, at 6:00 pm / Regular Meeting
Other Unscheduled Items Proposed
Date of Item
Department Agenda Category
Gift Policy City Attorney New Business
Social Host Ordinance City Attorney New Business
Joint Meeting with the School Board New Business
Personnel Manual Update New Business
Todd Bodem
Judith Young
Senior Account Manager, Member Agencies
July 9, 2024

CITY OF GUADALUPE
3CE Annual Presentation
Agenda Item No. 6

A PARTNERSHIP TO SUPPORT SHARED CUSTOMERS
2023 YEAR IN REVIEW
Lower emissions
Cleaner more reliable grid
Community investment
Stable and responsible rates
3CE PRIORITIZES INNOVATION
–One of California’s first solar + storage projects –The state’s first new geothermal project in three decades –The largest compressed air battery storage in the world ADDITIONALITY – THE KEY TO OUR

PROCUREMENT STRATEGY
Investing in a diverse portfolio of renewables coupled with innovative energy storage capacity

CALIFORNIA BREAKS RENEWABLE ENERGY

RECORDS
It’s working!
3CE DELIVERS POWER FOR GOOD
Affordable Rates Project Selection Criteria Rebates & Incentives

TACKLING TRANSPORTATION EMISSIONS
Electric Buses & Vans
Support Those in Need
Ag Electrification Program
 $700,000 for 30 projects in 2023  28% irrigation and harvest equip., portable power  32% tractors and forklifts  40% utility vehicles

GROWING SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE

INVESTING IN YOUR COMMUNITY
Residential, Commercial, & Agriculture Rebates Available Agriculture
Electrification
Program
- $75,000
Electrify Your Home
$17,385
$2,500 per unit
Concierge - $24,000
New Construction
Electrification
$5,000
$250,000
Electric Bus - $200,000
$1000-4000
$150,000
Electrify Your Ride
Residential
Commerical & Ag

INVESTING IN YOUR COMMUNITY
Total Investment Over $305,000
$55,364
Electric Bus Electrify Your Ride
$250,000
INVESTING IN YOUR CITY’S ENERGY TRANSITION
Member Agency Programs:

Plan Your Fleet
Electrify Your Fleet
Charge Your Fleet
INVESTING IN YOUR CITY’S ENERGY TRANSITION
– Reach Code Program
– Charging Stations/Charge-ready –Member Agency
Communications
Thank You
14 3CE.org [email protected]
877-455-2223
Senior Account Manager (805) 693-2000
Judith Young [email protected]
Agenda Item No. 8B

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GUADALUPE
Agenda of July 09, 2024
Approved by:

Veronica Fabian
Finance Account Clerk
(/Revi���
Janice Davis
Finance Director
Todd Bodem
City Administrator
SUBJECT:

RECOMMENDATION:

Payment of warrants for the period ending June 26, 2024, to be ratified for payment by the City Council. Subject to having been certified as being in conformity with the budget by the Finance Department staff.

That the City Council review and ratified the listing of hand checks and warrants to be paid on July 10, 2024.

BACKGROUND:

Submittal of the listing of warrants issued by the City to vendors for the period and explanations for disbursement of these warrants. An exception, such as an emergency hand check may be required to be issued and paid prior to submittal of the warrant listing, however, this warrant will be identified as "Ratify" on the warrant listing.

City of Guadalupe
Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Date Due Date
Payable Description Bank Code
Vendor: ACE03 - ACE TREE
20221�42 Invoice 6/17/2024 6/17/2024 6/17/2024
PW - W.MAIN FROM NELSON TO CESAR Warr Bank Acct - Warrants Bank Account CHAVEZ
Items
Item Description Commodity Units Price
HD CHIPPER AND CHIPPER TRUCK NA 0.00 0.00
Distributions
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key
071-4454-2150 Professional Services
Vendor: AKEOl - AKESO OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
S25343 Invoice 6/6/2024 6/6/2024 6/6/2024
ADM-PARK MAINTENANCE-PRE Warr Bank Acct - Warrants Bank Account

EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAM
Items
Item Description Commodity Units Price
ADM-PARK MAINTENANCE-PRE NA 0.00 0.00

EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAM
Distributions
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key
001-4145-2150 Professional Services
Items
Item Description Commodity Units Price
ADM-PARK MAINTENANCE-PRE NA 0.00 0.00

EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAM
Distributions
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key
001-4:l00-212Q Professional services
Vendor: AMAQ2 - AMAZON BUSINESS
11FD-YNCY-3RWG Invoice 6/20/2024 6/20/2024 6/20/2024
WWTP- ACCT#:Al9RD4DAF93AUQ Warr Bank Acct - Warrants Bank Account Items
Item Description Commodity Units Price
LIQUID BLEACH, SWIM POOL NA 0.00 0.00

SHOCK,FIRE HOSE NOZZLE
Distributions
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key
012-4425-1550 Operating Supplies & Exp.
11GR-3VD7-!;;6WH Invoice 6/22/2024 6/22/2024 6/22/2024
FINANCE - ACCT#:A19RD4DAF93AUQ Warr Bank Acct - Warrants Bank Account Items
Item Description Commodity Units Price
LYSOL WIPES, PLASTIC SPOONS NA 0.00 0.00
Distributions
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key
001-4120-1200 Office Supplies & Postage
13MD-LFKG-JFC4 Invoice 6/12/2024 6/12/2024 6/12/2024
P&R- ACCT#:A19RD40AF93AUQ Warr Bank Acct - Warrants Bank Account 6/28/2024 2:03: 15 PM
Payable Register
Payable Detail by Vendor Number
Packet: APPKT00295 - 07.09.24 BIWEEKLY RUN
Discount Date Amount Tax Shipping Discount Total
On Hold
Vendor Total: 1,650.00
6/17/2024 1,650.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,650.00
No
Amount Tax Shipping Discount Total
1,650.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,650.00
Amount Percent
1,650.00 100.00%
Vendor Total: 165.00
6/6/2024 165.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 165.00
No
Amount Tax Shipping Discount Total

82.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.50
Amount Percent

82.50 100.00%
Amount Tax Shipping Discount Total

82.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.50
Amount Percent

82.50 100.00%
Vendor Total: 2,195.54
6/20/2024 385.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 385.82
No
Amount Tax Shipping Discount Total
385.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 385.82
Amount Percent
385.82 100.00%
6/22/2024 21.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.70
No
Amount Tax Shipping Discount Total

21.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.70
Amount Percent

21.70 100.00%
6/12/2024 337.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 337.88
No

City of Guadalupe
Payable# Payable Type Post Date
Payable Description Bank Code
Vendor: GAR07 - MARIAELENA GARCIA
06192024 Invoice 6/19/2024
Payable Register
Payable Detail by Vendor Name
Packet: APPKT00293 - HAND CHECK - MARIA ELENA GARCIA
Payable Date Due Date Discount Date Amount Tax Shipping Discount Total On Hold
6/19/2024 6/19/2024 10,000.00 0.00
Vendor Total:

0.00 0.00
10,000.00
10,000.00

FINANCE - CHECK REQUEST -

MICROENTERPRISE GRANT
Warr Bank Acct - Warrants Bank Account
6/19/2024
No
Items
Item Description

FINANCE - CHECK REQUEST -

MICROENTERPRISE GRANT
Distributions
Account Number
106-4016-2164
6/20/2024 11:30:22 AM
Commodity
NA
Account Name
General Admin
Units

0.00 Price Amount

0.00 10,000.00
Project Account Key Amount
10,000.00
Tax Shipping Discount

0.00 0.00 0.00
Percent
100.00%
Total
10,000.00

6/27/2024 12:53:42 PM Page 1 of 5
Payable Register
City of Guadalupe Payable Detail by Vendor Number
Packet: APPKT00296 - 06.27.24 WEEKLY UTILITY RUN
Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Date Due Date
Payable Description Bank Code
Discount Date Amount Tax Shipping Discount Total
On Hold
Vendor: FRO01 - FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS Vendor Total: 712.65 6/4/2024 6/4/2024 6/4/2024
P&R-ACCT#:805-343-0362-07175-5 Warr Bank Acct - Warrants Bank Account 80534303620719755 Invoice 6/4/2024 502.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 502.23 No

0.00 0.00
Units
P&R-ACCT#:805-343-0362-07175-5 0.00
Item Description
502.23
Price Amount Tax

0.00 502.23
Commodity Shipping Total
NA
Items

0.00 Discount
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key Amount
Distributions
Percent
001-4145-1000 Utilities 502.23 100.00%
6/4/2024 6/4/2024 6/4/2024
P&R-ACCT#:805-343-5512-041588-5 Warr Bank Acct - Warrants Bank Account 80534355120415885-0624 Invoice 6/4/2024 97.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 97.53 No

0.00 0.00
Units
P&R-ACCT#:805-343-5512-041588-5 0.00
Item Description

97.53 Price Amount Tax

0.00 97.53
Commodity Shipping Total
NA
Items

0.00 Discount
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key Amount
Distributions
Percent
001-4145-1150 Communications 97.53 100.00%
6/7/2024 6/7/2024 6/7/2024
P&R - ACCT#:805-343-5713-061406-5 Warr Bank Acct - Warrants Bank Account 80534357130614065-0624 Invoice 6/7/2024 112.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 112.89 No

0.00 0.00
Units
P&R - ACCT#:805-343-5713-061406-5 0.00
Item Description
112.89
Price Amount Tax

0.00 112.89
Commodity Shipping Total
NA
Items

0.00 Discount
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key Amount
Distributions
Percent
001-4145-1150 Communications 112.89 100.00%
Vendor: HEN01 - EAGLE ENERGY, INC Vendor Total: 3,786.40 4/30/2024 4/30/2024 4/30/2024
FIRE - ACCT#:1197 FUEL CHARGES Warr Bank Acct - Warrants Bank Account 208115A Invoice 4/30/2024 356.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 356.10
No

0.00 0.00
Units
FIRE - ACCT#:1197 FUEL CHARGES 0.00
Item Description
356.10
Price Amount Tax

0.00 356.10
Commodity Shipping Total
NA
Items

0.00 Discount
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key Amount
Distributions
Percent
001-4220-1560 Fuels and Lubricants 356.10 100.00%
5/31/2024 5/31/2024 5/31/2024
FIRE - ACCT#:1197 FUEL CHARGES Warr Bank Acct - Warrants Bank Account 208805A Invoice 5/31/2024 238.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 238.10
No

0.00 0.00
Units
FIRE - ACCT#:1197 FUEL CHARGES 0.00
Item Description
238.10
Price Amount Tax

0.00 238.10
Commodity Shipping Total
NA
Items

0.00 Discount
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key Amount
Distributions
Percent
001-4220-1560 Fuels and Lubricants 238.10 100.00%
5/31/2024 5/31/2024 5/31/2024
WATER - FUEL CHARGES LOCKOUT: 06-15-24 Warr Bank Acct - Warrants Bank Account 208807A Invoice 5/31/2024 310.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 310.00
No

Payable Register Packet: APPKT00296 - 06.27.24 WEEKLY UTILITY RUN 6/27/2024 12:53:42 PM Page 2 of 5
Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Date Due Date
Payable Description Bank Code
Discount Date Amount Tax Shipping Discount Total
On Hold

0.00 0.00
Units
WATER - FUEL CHARGES LOCKOUT: 06- 0.00
15-24
Item Description
310.00
Price Amount Tax

0.00 310.00
Commodity Shipping Total
NA
Items

0.00 Discount
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key Amount
Distributions
Percent
010-4420-1560 Fuel & lubricants 310.00 100.00%
5/31/2024 5/31/2024 5/31/2024
PW-ACCT#:1208 FUEL CHARGES Warr Bank Acct - Warrants Bank Account 208808A Invoice 5/31/2024 385.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 385.49
No

0.00 0.00
Units
PW-ACCT#:1208 FUEL CHARGES 0.00
Item Description
385.49
Price Amount Tax

0.00 385.49
Commodity Shipping Total
NA
Items

0.00 Discount
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key Amount
Distributions
Percent
071-4454-1560 Fuels & Lubricants 385.49 100.00%
5/31/2024 5/31/2024 5/31/2024
P&R - ACCT#:1228 FUEL CHARGES Warr Bank Acct - Warrants Bank Account 208814A Invoice 5/31/2024 504.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 504.44
No

0.00 0.00
Units
P&R - ACCT#:1228 FUEL CHARGES 0.00
Item Description
504.44
Price Amount Tax

0.00 504.44
Commodity Shipping Total
NA
Items

0.00 Discount
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key Amount
Distributions
Percent
001-4145-1560 Fuel & lubricants 504.44 100.00%
5/31/2024 5/31/2024 5/31/2024
PD-ACCT#:1280 FUEL CHARGES Warr Bank Acct - Warrants Bank Account 208822A Invoice 5/31/2024 1,992.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,992.27 No

0.00 0.00
Units
PD-ACCT#:1280 FUEL CHARGES 0.00
Item Description
1,992.27
Price Amount Tax

0.00 1,992.27
Commodity Shipping Total
NA
Items

0.00 Discount
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key Amount
Distributions
Percent
001-4200-1560 Fuel & lubricants 1,992.27 100.00%
Vendor: PAC01 - PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC Vendor Total: 61.51 6/13/2024 6/13/2024 6/13/2024
PW-ACCT#:8009226397-1 Warr Bank Acct - Warrants Bank Account 80092263971-0624 Invoice 6/13/2024 61.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.51 No

0.00 0.00
Units
TR 29064 PASADERA PH 3 0.00
Item Description

61.51 Price Amount Tax

0.00 61.51
Commodity Shipping Total
NA
Items

0.00 Discount
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key Amount
Distributions
Percent
063-4472-1000 Utilities 61.51 100.00%
Vendor: VER05 - VERIZON WIRELESS Vendor Total: 1,420.72 6/30/2024 6/30/2024 6/30/2024
FIRE- ACCT#:942045079-00001 WIRELESS Warr Bank Acct - Warrants Bank Account

COMMUNICATION
9966157649 Invoice 6/30/2024 126.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 126.48 No

0.00 0.00
Units
FIRE- ACCT#:942045079-00001 WIRELESS 0.00

COMMUNICATION
Item Description
126.48
Price Amount Tax

0.00 126.48
Commodity Shipping Total
NA
Items

0.00 Discount
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key Amount
Distributions
Percent
001-4220-1150 Communications 126.48 100.00%
6/18/2024 6/18/2024 6/18/2024
ADM-ACCT#:642087942-00001-WIRELESS Warr Bank Acct - Warrants Bank Account

COMMUNICATION
9966930322 Invoice 6/18/2024 1,294.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,294.24 No

Payable Register Packet: APPKT00296 - 06.27.24 WEEKLY UTILITY RUN 6/27/2024 12:53:42 PM Page 3 of 5
Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Date Due Date
Payable Description Bank Code
Discount Date Amount Tax Shipping Discount Total
On Hold

0.00 0.00
Units
ADM-ACCT#:642087942-00001- 0.00

WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
Item Description
222.40
Price Amount Tax

0.00 222.40
Commodity Shipping Total
NA
Items

0.00 Discount
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key Amount
Distributions
Percent
071-4454-1150 Communications 222.40 100.00%

0.00 0.00
Units
ADM-ACCT#:642087942-00001- 0.00

WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
Item Description
171.39
Price Amount Tax

0.00 171.39
Commodity Shipping Total
NA
Items

0.00 Discount
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key Amount
Distributions
Percent
012-4425-1150 Communications 171.39 100.00%

0.00 0.00
Units
ADM-ACCT#:642087942-00001- 0.00

WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
Item Description
251.41
Price Amount Tax

0.00 251.41
Commodity Shipping Total
NA
Items

0.00 Discount
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key Amount
Distributions
Percent
010-4420-1150 Communications 251.41 100.00%

0.00 0.00
Units
ADM-ACCT#:642087942-00001- 0.00

WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
Item Description

51.63 Price Amount Tax

0.00 51.63
Commodity Shipping Total
NA
Items

0.00 Discount
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key Amount
Distributions
Percent
001-4200-1150 Communications 51.63 100.00%

0.00 0.00
Units
ADM-ACCT#:642087942-00001- 0.00

WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
Item Description
129.08
Price Amount Tax

0.00 129.08
Commodity Shipping Total
NA
Items

0.00 Discount
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key Amount
Distributions
Percent
001-4300-1150 Communications 129.08 100.00%

0.00 0.00
Units
ADM-ACCT#:642087942-00001- 0.00

WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
Item Description

77.44 Price Amount Tax

0.00 77.44
Commodity Shipping Total
NA
Items

0.00 Discount
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key Amount
Distributions
Percent
001-4145-1150 Communications 77.44 100.00%

0.00 0.00
Units
ADM-ACCT#:642087942-00001- 0.00

WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
Item Description
103.26
Price Amount Tax

0.00 103.26
Commodity Shipping Total
NA
Items

0.00 Discount
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key Amount
Distributions
Percent
001-4105-1150 Communications 103.26 100.00%

0.00 0.00
Units
ADM-ACCT#:642087942-00001- 0.00

WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
Item Description
287.63
Price Amount Tax

0.00 287.63
Commodity Shipping Total
NA
Items

0.00 Discount
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key Amount
Distributions
Percent
001-4120-1150 Communications 287.63 100.00%

Payable Register Packet: APPKT00296 - 06.27.24 WEEKLY UTILITY RUN 6/27/2024 12:53:42 PM Page 4 of 5
Type Count Gross Tax Shipping Total Manual Payment Balance Payable Summary
Discount
Invoice 12 5,981.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,981.28 0.00 5,981.28 Grand Total: 5,981.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,981.28 0.00 5,981.28

Payable Register Packet: APPKT00296 - 06.27.24 WEEKLY UTILITY RUN 6/27/2024 12:53:42 PM Page 5 of 5
Account Summary
Account Name Amount
001-4105-1150 Communications 103.26
001-4120-1150 Communications 287.63
001-4145-1000 Utilities 502.23
001-4145-1150 Communications 287.86
001-4145-1560 Fuel & lubricants 504.44
001-4200-1150 Communications 51.63
001-4200-1560 Fuel & lubricants 1,992.27
001-4220-1150 Communications 126.48
001-4220-1560 Fuels and Lubricants 594.20
001-4300-1150 Communications 129.08
Total: 4,579.08
Account Name Amount
010-4420-1150 Communications 251.41
010-4420-1560 Fuel & lubricants 310.00
Total: 561.41
Account Name Amount
012-4425-1150 Communications 171.39
Total: 171.39
Account Name Amount
063-4472-1000 Utilities 61.51
Total: 61.51
Account Name Amount
071-4454-1150 Communications 222.40
071-4454-1560 Fuels & Lubricants 385.49
Total: 607.89

7/2/2024 11:25:15 AM Page 1 of 3
Payable Register
City of Guadalupe Payable Detail by Vendor Number
Packet: APPKT00308 - HAND CHECK - CALPERS (CEPPT)
Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Date Due Date
Payable Description Bank Code
Discount Date Amount Tax Shipping Discount Total
On Hold
Vendor: CEP01 - CALPERS (CEPPT) Vendor Total: 349,119.00 7/1/2024 7/1/2024 7/1/2024
FINANCE-CHECK REQUEST - UNFUNDED Warr Bank Acct - Warrants Bank Account

LIABILITY PAYMENT
07012024 Invoice 7/1/2024 349,119.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 349,119.00 No

0.00 0.00
Units
CEPPT IRS SECTION 115 TRUST 0.00
Item Description
349,119.00
Price Amount Tax

0.00 349,119.00
Commodity Shipping Total
NA
Items

0.00 Discount
Account Number Account Name Project Account Key Amount
Distributions
Percent
001-4140-0250 Retirement - PERS 349,119.00 100.00%

Payable Register Packet: APPKT00308 - HAND CHECK - CALPERS (CEPPT) 7/2/2024 11:25:15 AM Page 2 of 3
Type Count Gross Tax Shipping Total Manual Payment Balance Payable Summary
Discount
Invoice 1 349,119.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 349,119.00 0.00 349,119.00 Grand Total: 349,119.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 349,119.00 0.00 349,119.00

Payable Register Packet: APPKT00308 - HAND CHECK - CALPERS (CEPPT) 7/2/2024 11:25:15 AM Page 3 of 3
Account Summary
Account Name Amount
001-4140-0250 Retirement - PERS 349,119.00
Total: 349,119.00

June 18, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 14

MINUTES
City of Guadalupe
Special Meeting of the Guadalupe City Council
Tuesday, June 18, 2024, at 6:00 pm
City Hall, 918 Obispo Street, Council Chambers
and
1775 East County Rd. 1300
Carthage, IL 62321

1. ROLL CALL:

Council Member Christina Hernandez
Council Member Gilbert Robles
Council Member Whitney Furness
Mayor Pro Tempore Eugene Costa Jr.

Mayor Ariston Julian
Mayor Julian called the special meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Council Member Costa, Jr. was absent. All others were present with Council Member Furness present via zoom. (Note: The abbreviation, “CM” for “Council Member”, will be used in these minutes.)

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION FORUM
Request to Speak:

George Alvarez: This weekend for the first time in a long time, we’ve had activity with our police department. Tickets were given out. It’s about time. Each time they give a ticket, the City gets $55.00 per ticket. We need more action with people doing U-turns. A community without policing and a community that doesn’t obey the law really messes things up. Thank you to the Police Department for doing their job.

Another thing is there’s blight in our town. There are two (2) houses that are horrendous. They should be tagged and one should be demolished. Have we talked to the owners to see if they can improve their properties and improve the community as a whole? There’s a lot of lack of activity in the enforcement team. Looking at homes, yards, and what-not off of 11th Street, there are apartment buildings… A community that does not take care of itself will dwindle. It’s an eyesore…it’s an embarrassment. We have five (5) of you guys up there to take care of the goods of the City. We have staff that’s supposed to do certain responsibilities, and I see they’re not doing it.

Agenda Item No. 8C
June 18, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 14 I’ve lived here for 75 years. I love this little town…not so much the people, but the town has good history. It’s your responsibility to take care of that.

Mireya Piña: Fireworks…since last year and this year, there’s been an increase in fees in the space on the parking lot and storage behind the Police Department where we would store some of the fireworks. New fees were shared. I just hope that we could consider some of the new suggested fees that we’ve come up with.

Sam Duarte: I work with families, community engagement, and leadership development. We’ve been doing it for 14 years. We’re the Guadalupe Community Changers. We collaborate with the City and non-profits across the county. We have a major fundraiser coming up. It brings us much needed funding to keep going. This year actual fees were dug up, the fee schedule with quite an increase. This funding is hard to come by. You can’t get it with traditional funding sources. Family Service Agency is collaborating on a potential grant to beautify one of our parks. Showing that type of collaboration and partnership, we hope that you will consider reduction of fees for this particular non-profit.

Deborah Sykes: There’s a common problem here. Tractors coming in town, being on the road, and not pulling over. I was coming home from Tahoe. it took me 20 minutes to go from Oso Flaco Road through town to turn on 5th Street. Police, look at the tractors. Make them pull over. Tractors can be controlled in town. There’s no way to get to 5th Street without going on Hwy 1.

REGULAR BUSINESS

4. ROYAL THEATER PROJECT PRESENTATIONS AND UPDATE.

A. Thomas Brandeberry, Project Manager

1. Presentation

2. Precision Estimating Services – Royal Theater Construction Cost Estimate (NOTE: Please go to the City’s website at www.cityofguadalupe.org under “City Administration…Agendas/Minutes” for the complete presentations.) Mr. Brandeberry gave a brief background on the Royal Theatre and the project to refurbish and develop it into a performing arts center. He stated that he’s been involved with this project since 2018-2019. Some of the highlights of the presentation were as follows:
• The building is listed as historic by both Federal and State. The Japanese owners of the building were interned and, unfortunately, never got the property back. Much of downtown was considered “Japan town”…much went away. There is the theatre and two (2) vacant properties attached which now is all “one” site.
• Project started because of theatre’s value to be reopened – value to downtown businesses. • The Royal Theatre was considered the most important thing for revitalization of the downtown area in all City plans.
• Many people remember when the theatre was open in its heyday. A hundred people have told stories of going to the theatre. Many of those people still live in Guadalupe.

June 18, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 14 • The completed project will be the first ever performing arts center in Guadalupe. GBA wanted a stronger tourism – too many dollars leave Guadalupe and not a lot come in. The Royal Theatre is that thing that could bring dollars into Guadalupe. • From an art perspective, there is nothing in town for the kids, and the adults, too, to be involved in performing arts.
• There is currently no operator for the theatre. The operator will create an advisory committee with local residents. It’s important that the operator and the City ensure that this theatre is used for non-profits. The community aspect of this theatre is very important. • To date, the $10.5M in funding is a “capital campaign’…funds from EDA, CA Arts Council and RDA funds (Successor Agency). (Note: the RDA purchased the theatre; the State eliminated RDA, put the Successor Agency in charge who then gave it to the City with the agreement that the theatre would be renovated into a performing arts center. The theatre has to meet state and federal guidelines. Plans have been approved, plan check completed, and permits issued. The estimated construction and soft costs for this project showed a projected shortfall of approximately $3M.
• Project costs include construction costs and “soft” costs, such as project management, building inspector, etc. These “soft” costs are pretty solid as they’re based on contracts that individuals already have.
• Having an idea that there’d be a gap in financing, tax credits were explored. The consultant was hired to look into both historic and new market tax credits. Consultant said earlier this year that “we pitched the new market tax credits and nobody wants it”. For historic tax credits, federal monies must go to a “for profit”. The EDA said we could not use EDA money where it’s going to a “for profit” because that’s enriching a private entity. (If the EDA monies were lost from a timing perspective, we could go back and get this historic tax credits. The monies are available and can be obtained under the right circumstances.) • To ensure long term sustainability, the goal is for the project to not carry debt. Other funding sources were researched such as banks, federal/state, USDA rural loans, foundations and capital campaign. The General Obligation Bond meets the goal of zero debt to the project.
• It was emphasized that the quoted “$77” for a single-family residence is an estimated annual cost, not monthly.

B. Andrew Goodwin Designs, Architect

1. Presentation
Mr. Goodwin is the architect for the Royal Theatre project. He began working with the City back in 2016 with the refurbishing of Le Roy Park. In 2020 he was asked to provide pro-bono design services to see what could be done with the Royal Theatre. The initial assessment was that there was a lot to improve. The significant plus was the boxed art deco building. He said that those types of building don’t exist elsewhere. Creating structural stability was needed.

Mr. Goodwin went through a variety of slides showing the current configuration of the Royal Theatre and designs to turn it into a performing arts center. Because of the theatre’s historic June 18, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 14 stance, Mr. Goodwin said, “Federal and State tell us what we can and can’t do with historic buildings. You can’t put a brick building next to a brick building and make it look like it was original. The building that’s addition to it has to be subservient in both perspective and in style. It can’t be gaudy and an overlooked item on the property. The seating area will be refurbished as will the existing concession area and restrooms to make them ADA compliant.

The entry lobby flooring will be preserved. There’ll be a commercial kitchen added to the first floor as well as additional restrooms, a lounge, secondary lobby and new stairway.

The new second floor plan showed a flex-spaced classroom, projector room, new restroom, outdoor deck, flex office space and refurbished marquee. The new third floor will have an outdoor roof deck, mechanical roof deck, interior flex space and an “escape stair”. It was discussed that this area might be good for small groups to have events.

There will be parking in the back of the theatre off Olivera Street. However, spaces are limited so the majority of parking will need to be on the streets as well as the Veterans Memorial Plaza. This project will also include a public plaza and an outdoor amphitheater.

A landscape plan was also shown with drought tolerant planting, flat turb area for outdoor events, landscape plaza and stormwater management and street trees at the parking lot.

Various types of plants were shown as possibilities to go with the historic design of the theatre.

Mayor Julian then asked before opening the discussion with the public, if City Attorney Sinco and/or CM Furness, who were both on zoom, had any questions or comments on the presentations. Both City Attorney Sinco and CM Furness had no questions.

CM Hernandez asked, “If we lose the EDA (Economic Development Administration) monies, can we use historic tax credits?” Mr. Brandeberry said, “Yes, we have some timeline issues with EDA. This came from President Biden’s infrastructure bill. Because it came from emergency infrastructure monies, there are some specific guidelines. By March 2025, we must start construction. They’d also expect to finish by March 2027. If we don’t have the $3M, we need to change the project and have to do new plans. New plans won’t get done by March 2025. Maybe wed only have the movie theatre and nothing else. We probably have enough money to do just that.”
Ms. Janice Davis, Finance Director, then asked, “The historic tax credits…how much would they be and how would they come in?” Mr. Brandeberry said, “We’d need to create an LLC to collect the monies which we haven’t done at this point. It would be between $600k-$700K. It all comes in when construction starts…one chunk of money.” Ms. Davis added, “Then it wouldn’t fill the $3M gap.” Mr. Brandeberry agreed that it wouldn’t fill the financial gap.

Before turning things over to those requesting to speak, Mayor Julian said, “The plans are exquisite to me. The end product would be a great one for Guadalupe. Just how do we get there is why we’re here.” He then opened it up to those who requested to speak. He did say June 18, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 14 that for those who came in late to the meeting, there were speaker request forms in the back if they wished to speak.

Deborah Sykes: I’ve lived in Guadalupe for 35 years and to some of you, I’m a child, in that respect. I know people who’ve lived here their entire lives, and their families have been here for generations. Despite the fact that I’m relatively new, I love this town. I’ve seen the historic retail disappear, and it breaks my heart. The population has grown exponentially. The balance with the retail is off the mark.…way low in retail to help support our community. I want to know about the parking. How much is there? (Mr. Goodwin said that there will be 11 spaces.) That means that Guadalupe Street, Hwy 1, will be overwhelmed if we have big events. In my mind, it’s worth it.

I believe in this project. I want to see the city thrive. Anything we can do is a benefit. I know it’s going to cost me and my property taxes. I my mind, I’m willing to do that. Is there any chance that these funds will be reallocated? (Response was ‘no’.) What are the estimated rental fees for events? (Mr. Brandeberry said we’d need an operator to answer that.) Are Guadalupe community events to be billed? (Mr. Brandeberry said that the operator and City have to negotiate those things.) People who are not in attendance today, new and old members in the community, all told me that they are for this project.

George Alvarez: I have a problem with this project. It’s the cost factor that bothers me.…$10M+ should be enough. I’m not for raising property taxes with the large amount of monies that you’re receiving. A lot of people that live here really have a history of not actually accepting the ability of the City Council to do its job. We’ve gone through various phases of taxes…school taxes, one of them, adding taxes. I heard $77…value of house for 30 years. I want to know that number before I vote on something that’s going to raise my taxes if I have property here. $10M+ should be sufficient to take care of the job.

Shouldn’t continue to tax the community for a handout…what’s the return? I held two (2) 4th of July events at the Royal Theatre with Hancock College, Atkinson Dancers, etc. The reception is very low. The community doesn’t accept certain things here. There’s a downside of developing any form of income for the purpose of having activities. Again, I think the monies are enough. Find ways of other sources, if possible. If we can just take care of the theatre to start, that’s fine. Do it in areas of progression. We’re always caught up in timelines, and the general public gets screwed.

Albert Nunez, Jr.: I wanted to drop in some comments on the other side of the project.

Tonight, you’ve heard about the financial piece and how the project will lay out. The impact of an arts program or a PAC (Performing Arts Center) on a community is calculable. There’s a lot of data that suggests that bringing a focal point of arts to a community can do wonders for its younger generations and also for its older generations. In Phoenix, when they developed their arts center, they saw, in the arts downtown area, a 104% increase in tax revenues against a citywide deficit of 1%. Developing a PAC here will bring taxes, but a community becomes more connected. Projects born in the community and put on by the June 18, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 14 community start to develop a community pride. Your City Council meetings will be standing room only.

Participants who are more involved in arts programs are more involved in civic issues. Caring more about the home that we have…it’s not just a place to get our mail. Some of the skills that participants gain from the arts are accountability, time management, creative expression, pride in accomplishment in what you’ve built, etc. I have a report in the Library of Congress. The subject is “Using Theatre as a Medium of Education”. It was my senior project from Cal Poly. The research I did for that study took three (3) years. I developed a theatre club of high school students traveling up and down California for three (3) years promoting AIDS awareness in 1993. The impact of the arts on this community outweighs, for me, any cost that I’m willing to pay on my taxes. Thank you.

Melissa Chavez: Thank you for letting me share my thoughts and my experiences. Like other Guadalupeans, I fondly remember the Royal Theatre as a fundamental part of my childhood.

One of my earliest recollections was sitting in the front row with my sister to watch the premiere screening of the Beatles’ “Hard Day’s Night” in 1964. The screaming of my auntie’s friends seated behind me was deafening and a quintessential childhood memory. Then a decade later, the theatre was packed with many of the same people who cheered Guadalupe kids celebrating their 8th grade promotions including me. The Royal Theatre was one of the few places where entire families could gather on a weekly basis to enjoy popular American movies, as well as multi-cultural screenings of Filipino and Mexican films, play Keno, attend talent shows, and even watch a simulcast of Muhammad Ali’s latest prize fight. No other building drew community members from all walks of life like the Royal Theatre which sits vacant and crumbling today.

One memory I have is of Mr. Domingo, a Spanish and arts teacher, in 8th grade. He selected a group of drawings and paintings from his class to be displayed at Security Pacific Bank downtown. My work was included, and I can’t express how encouraging that was. It was in the City Council chambers, right here, this room that I attended English classes in junior high school. It was here that Mr. Beligmeyer encouraged us to read literature and speak from the lectern. I didn’t believe that I was qualified to make my voice heard in any way. But the suggestion that I could contribute helped build my confidence that helped me in my senior year in Cottonwood, Arizona.

It was there that I noticed a campus with an indoor amphitheater as the center of the school.

It was there that I became immersed in the performing arts. Not only did I thrive but my “C” grades began “A’s”. Later as a churchgoer, I lead congregations in musical worship. As a parent, I learned to play the guitar and taught my children how to play, too. All three (3) grew up to be musicians. In other words, extra effort by Mr. Beligmeyer, Mr. Domingo and my drama teacher in Arizona made a difference in my experience.

As you know, the Royal Theatre is located within the Japanese enclave at the south end of historical commercial business district. The theatre was opened in 1940 by Mr. Arthur S.

June 18, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 14 Fukuda. In 1942, Mr. Fukuda was forced to sell the building when he and his wife were interned in a relocation center in Arkansas. One of the greatest ironies in our community is that when war bonds were being sold at the Royal Theatre in 1942, its owner and many Japanese Americans like him were being rounded up and sent away. It’s my appeal today, on behalf of the Royal Theatre, a little bit quieter but no less significant. I see more than a neglected building. What I see is a world of possibility. I, too, have a vision for kids to thrive just like I did. I stand on the shoulders of great teachers and others who are working right now in this town to make Guadalupe a great place to live. So, I humbly ask the members of the Council and the Mayor, to preserve, renovate, and, indeed, enlarge our beloved icon in honor of Arthur S. Fukuda, who established it to benefit generations of Guadalupeans right now and here to come. Thank you.

Mireya Peña: I work with Family Services Agency, Little House by the Park. I’m just here to share a couple observations. I don’t live here, but I work and play here. And I don’t feel I have a place to express a stance. I just wanted to share some things that I’ve heard from the community that we work with. This is a complex issue. This presentation and hearing folks’ comments kind of help paint a picture. I’ve heard a lot of people saying “yes”, a lot of “noes”, a lot of people highlighting the pros and cons. I think one of the most common concerns I’m hearing is community access to the building once it’s there. The “noes” are coming from folks currently in financial hardships. Adding an additional expense at the end of the year can make a big difference, particularly for those who rely on social security, for example. The bond is for 30 years. I’ve heard talk that there are additional bonds for the school. How many more within 30 years will come up that will require a last resort like this.

I wanted to share something that doesn’t relate to this but it does, to some extent, last October, I went to gun violence training for three (3) days. One of the takeaways I took from this training is that it’s important to invest in projects that benefit our community. But we have to think about sustainability. The thing that stood out was that it’s important to fund things but to keep the funding there. There’s more damage to the community if there’s no consistency. Programs get shut down which can impact people and youth who partake in these new projects. Thank you for your time.

Jeannie Mello: I’ve lived in Guadalupe for 21 years. My comments are born out of their presentations. What are the bid packages and when are they going out? (Mr. Brandeberry said, “When there’s a project and everything comes together, specifications, plans and City’s rules…it goes out for bid. We usually wait 60-90 days for contractors to submit those bids.

We’re required to take the lowest bid.”)
The $3M gap. What guarantee is there that it won’t go higher? (Mr. Brandeberry said, “None.”) Okay, so I think the estimates given are a problem because it’s so wishy-washy.

There’s nothing written in stone…too many variables.

Mira Beyeler: I’m with the Guadalupe Visual & Performing Arts Center (GVPAC). Since 2019, we’ve been working with the City and the renovation of the Royal Theatre. The GVPAC was June 18, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 14 involved in the early stages of design with AGD (Andrew Goodwin Designs). In 2022, the City approved an MOU with the GVPAC as the eventual operators of the Royal Theatre. While I acknowledge that the MOU has expired, I think it’s important to note that the commitment GVPAC has had to the theatre for the past five (5) years on this project as a whole. Outside of the theatre, GVPAC has and will continue to be committed to expanding the arts and children-focused opportunities in Guadalupe and the broader Santa Maria Valley. We’ve partnered with various organizations to host events and workshops, including working with the GBA, Dunes Center, etc. We are very committed to seeing the Royal Theatre renovated and reopened. We believe having multiple efforts of raising the additional funds will only improve the chances of the project being completed to its full potential.

GVPAC has met with the Guadalupe Community Action Coalition (GCAC), the City’s new nonprofit, three (3) times over the past two (2) months expressing interest in partnering with the City to run an additional capital campaign that will help and not hurt the current financial situation. We were told to present a proposal to the GCAC who would then bring the proposal to the Council for formal approval. This proposal has been shared with the GCAC, and we look forward to hearing any updates from the GCAC or the City so we can begin these efforts. If any of the community or any other organizations would like to partner with the GVPAC on additional fundraising efforts, we would love any and all partnerships. Thank you.

Garret Matsuura: I first want to acknowledge the hard work that Thomas has done towards fundraising but also the incredible amount of work that Andrew has done. It’s very much appreciated. I have a couple questions and a couple statements.

1. In looking at the Precision estimates, I didn’t see any mention about the marquee itself.

Knowing what a big part of the identity of the theatre and the fact that that’s one of the primary marketing of events of the City, need to make sure to deal with the marquee.

2. Operational debt – would a successful capital campaign mitigate debit obligations for operations, if the capital campaign was specific for operational costs?

3. If the $3M gap is soft costs vs construction costs, is the EDA grant still affected? If the EDA is only concerned with construction costs, can we skirt around that deadline issue?

4. I did hear in the presentation that one of the obligations for any future operator…I’m totally aware and my disclosure that being treasurer for the GVPAC, I’m totally aware that it has to be publicly noticed. One of the things I did want to point out was that any future operator needed to have an advisory committee. The GVPAC is fully committed to and has already started creating an advisory committee.

5. There were questions by the audience about rental costs? GVPAC has created some forecasting…I don’t have those numbers, but those numbers can be provided to Council.

6. When people talk about economic development and that the Royal Theatre will help, absolutely, without a doubt, I know it will help. It’s one of the things the GBA since its inception when CM Robles was its president is focusing on is economic development for the City. It’s also important to know that there’s no silver bullet. There’s nothing that’s going to turn the economics of this town around just because it’s there. There must be long-range planning…integration and cooperation between a multitude of businesses. It’s June 18, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Minutes Page 9 of 14 just not a theatre. There are real estate concerns, availability of retail space, and all sorts of things that have to be talked about. This is a much wider discussion. I did want to emphasize that the GBA stands committed to work with the City on these long-range economic development plans. Thank you.

Melanie Becker: I’m a resident of Guadalupe. I echo what Al, Melissa, Garret and Mireya have all been saying. The design is gorgeous. I had a great high school. I had great art training…it gave me confidence and changed my life. It helped in so many ways. I’m fully behind this project. There’s one problem here – the communication that we have going, and I guess we need to figure it out. If back in April 2023, there was an estimate, and it rose to $13.8M, why didn’t we know? Why didn’t GBA know? Why didn’t the rest of us know because we have other access to get money? I heard about it in March 2024. And I don’t understand this miscommunication. It took a year for the consultants to find out that you can’t get those new market tax credits. That doesn’t make sense to me. I think this is all great. We gotta do what we gotta do. Keep it going to make sure it happens…a bond, or whatever.

Communication is bad, and we need checks and balances.

Jose Nichols: I just want to say a few words about an investment in our community. In 1972, I started with the Guadalupe School District. Believe it or not, the school administration prided itself in sending money back to Sacramento. Money was for underachieving students. Luckily, that changed. Not only were other things going wrong with the school district, it took 20 years, maybe more, to turn that around. And, yes, I remember Mr. Beligmeyer. This class was my class. I taught third year bilingual here. It’s an investment as I mentioned at the last council meeting. We can’t afford not to take this opportunity to make this community continue thriving because it’s already thriving. Thanks to Los Amigos de Guadalupe…thanks to all the other organizations that contributed.

This is a personal look. Both of our sons went to this school. I was their principal. One went to Berklee College of Music, majored in songwriting. He’s now here in Santa Maria working remotely in Boston at Berklee College of Music. Our other son is a construction manager working for the school districts up and down the coast. There are other examples of individuals who have gone to school…I talked to a parent the other day whose daughter is going to be a heart surgeon in San Jose. Her last name is Zepeda.

I just want to leave that with you. It’s an investment. Yes, it’s a hardship, sometimes, for some folks to make. But in the long run things will prevail, and we’ll have this town and the future that we want. Thank you.

Deek Segovia: I don’t live in town anymore, but Guadalupe’s in my blood. It’s in there…you can’t remove it. I always hear that there’s nothing to do here in Guadalupe. And here we have an opportunity to do something. All these people who are saying that there’s nothing to do…especially, we have new homes here, and they’re finding there’s nothing to do. Well, look at this. Here’s something to do. We need to invest in our youth. Guadalupe’s always known for its superior athletes, superior…just like Jose was just saying. There are people in town who June 18, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Minutes Page 10 of 14 are overlooked oftentimes. This is a Hispanic community, and most times it’s said that Hispanics are going nowhere. But these kinds of things open the door for these Hispanic young people to experience something that is happening out in the world. And they can do it right here in Guadalupe. If I lived here, I’d be in favor of it. Thank you.

Steve Herring: I live here in town and work here in town. Do we have an estimated operating costs? We talk about rentals and talk about an operator. Do we have any operators expressing interest? Are these real people that exist? Does an operator want it? Do we have income statements from these types of projects? Getting it built is one thing. Making a profit month after month after month, in time, I know not immediately, does it pencil? Do we have any figures of operational success? (Mayor Julian said, “I don’t think we’re at that point.

There’s one group that is interested, so far. We haven’t put out the word for others…”) Mr.

Herring continued…I was gathering that. It seems to me that that would be vital unanswered questions.

At this point, Mira Beyeler added, “No numbers to share. We’ve run numbers and projections of what first 3-5 years would look like. GVPAC has a board that’s actively running. We have projected what the first 3-5 years would look like. It’s important, not just for GVPAC, but for any potential operator that might come in that communication is so very important. If it’s a requirement of any funding source by early next year that process has run its course, I think the types of conversations of what the City is expecting is important to have that information out there sooner rather than later. Everyone’s going to need that information in order to be successful. Giving every non-profit and every potential operator the facts improves the chances of long-term sustainability, resilience and success. That’s a really key critical piece that’s been missing so far. And I want to express the crucialness of having those conversations be sooner rather than later for everybody, so we can get what’s really needed to have this be for the next 30, 40, 50, 100 years in the future for whoever comes in so that everyone has an opportunity to experience what these amazing plans have to offer.” Mr. Herring continued…If profitable, where will the funds go? To the operator or will there be some payback to the City for all of our investment to build the place? (Mr. Brandeberry said, “You have quite a few questions and I have some answers. Yes, there was an initial relationship between the City and GVPAC. There have been conversations whether this should be a more competitive process open to other non-profits. In answer to some of your questions, the City is in the middle of writing an RFP which will be called something like a lease/management agreement where the agreement between the non-profit and the City will outline a lot of these things. The RFP will have questions in it, and I don’t want to say what those questions are, but there will be questions asking about the things you’re asking about.

The long-term sustainability of the theatre does depend on the non-profit operating the theatre. It also depends on the City’s ability to supervisor that non-profit and their work. The RFP and the lease/management agreement will cover all of those bases.” (Mr. Brandeberry continued…”Anytime you build a new building or renovate a building, it’s always important to have what’s called “reserves”. Capital, maintenance and operating June 18, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Minutes Page 11 of 14 reserves are all needed for funding to get project up and going. There’ll be an agreement set that says that reserves stay there, that operational reserves stay there for the purpose of future things. You’re absolutely right that those things are not there now. The goal here is to have that agreement and the operator done before construction starts. We believe that the operator should be there when constructions starts and be part of the construction team.

That is the plan. If the RFP and the management agreement all get done, the management agreement has to go to Council for approval. You’ll be able to see that management agreement when Council gets it.”)
Mr. Herring continued…Who knows? What’s the bottom-line? Will it be profitable? (Mr.

Brandeberry said, “And that’s why we think the operator, one of the questions the operator should answer those questions, not the Cit.”)
Mr. Herring continued…We just should know before we build, you know. (Mr. Brandeberry said, “Well, yes and no. Most performing arts centers are built by the operator, by the nonprofit performing arts center. In those situations, you’re absolutely right. They do have that information but this is being built by the City…so, it’s slightly different for that reason. Well, we should have that information. It’s just not coming as fast as we all want.”) Arnulfo Navarro: I live here in Guadalupe. It seems to me that the bond’s the most logical, because we’re going to get everything we want…but the community will want blood. This is going to have to pay off for us. We’re expecting much because we’re paying for it pretty much. Not in reality but that’s like the feel it’s gonna get. Whoever the operator is, I want to say, should be local, enough to know this town. All the programming…I don’t know the woman who talked about the Japanese programming, the Filipino programming, the Mexican programming, that all has to be incorporated. The culture has to grow. It has to come from someone who knows the culture. Otherwise, we’re going to feel like an outsider in our own place. Maybe a possible offset would be that you have a Guadalupe resident on your ID…it’s free for a movie one night a week. Little things like that that come from the operator feel good. Okay, I’m being taken care of. You want to see results come from a meaningful place. It is a nice design but, I will say, the outdoor amphitheater isn’t really…it’s cold and windy. It’s not ideal for outdoor performances. It’s nice on paper, but, in reality, I don’t think it's going to get the use we like it to be. That’s just my opinion. Thank you.

Deborah Sykes: I’m also a singer, songwriter and recording artist. I just want to reiterate the joy and influence that theatre and music had in my life. Another thing and I hope this is appropriate…I’m a graphic designer. Any of the non-profits helping with this project, or otherwise, I’m available to do, fliers, mailers, banners, anything like that. If you’re interested, let me know.

Jeannie Mello: I want to go back to the lack of communication here. It’s just a sorry little mess because Tom and I have gone around and around on Facebook. He’s saying that information was available way back when. I can’t get him to understand that we didn’t get the information. I figure if we can get a damn flyer out in the mail, we can get information out in June 18, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Minutes Page 12 of 14 an email to the residents what’s happening here. I don’t drive north very often so I don’t see the Royal Theatre marquee. It’s ridiculous for people to use that as a form of communication.

I think there should be a master email list. Maybe there is…I would assume there is. And that’s how people should receive their communication.

Mayor Julian asked City Attorney Sinco if he had any questions or comments. He did not. The mayor then asked CM Furness the same. She said, “I just want to thank everyone for coming out with very good information that was shared from the community and everyone who’s been working on the project. This has been helpful to me coming into the Council just a couple of months ago. Thanks for catching me up and thank you for being here.” The mayor added, “I think one comment regarding communication is very important. From the get-go, we need to make sure it’s included on our agenda…that we talk about updates on what’s going on with the theatre. I appreciate the comments from the gentleman here. If you can actually do a recap of the narrative and questions that were asked so we can respond to the community and public.

Stephanie Krouse: If tonight you vote to move forward with the bond…if it becomes the next cycle of voting…(Mayor Julian interjected saying, “It’s not tonight.”) Ms. Krouse continued…right, if it comes on the ballot, and if residents vote ‘No’, what happens? (Mayor Julian said, “It was mentioned that there are different avenues. I mentioned this before. There’s a toolbox that has tools in it. One of them is the bond. If that doesn’t work because you need a screwdriver as opposed to a wrench, then you look at another tool box. We have a lot of individual farmers who may want to kick in. You have the Japanese community…the Latino community…Chumash. All these different avenues that we can look at. I want to thank Andrew for being here to show the specifics of what’s going on.

It’s correct that a lot of people haven’t seen this. They will from now on. There are more avenues than just the bond. It’s going to be a battle to have two-thirds of the community to support that. So, I think we need to use that other toolbox to see what other menu we do have out there to go after for initial funding.”)
Ms. Krouse continued…Also, whatever communications there are can be put in Spanish, as well. I’m worried that we’re missing a whole group of people who are typically at work most of the day. And they missed all of this information. What comes across, which I think has been wonderful information and it great to hear about, but if it’s not in the language that most people are speaking, it’s not really available to them.

Mayor Julian emphasized that the City cannot be involved in pushing the bond measure as there are restrictions. It has to come from volunteers to move it forward.

Shirley Boydstun: I think the bond issue is going to be the biggest issue here. I don’t know if any of you have seen the handout that came from the Santa Maria School District. As of now, there will be $194M going on the November ballot. Our $3M will be peanuts according to that. You need to factor all of that in. Every bond issue that goes in there has an amount that June 18, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Minutes Page 13 of 14 everybody’s going to pay for 30 years. Renters are not home free…landlords will have to pay a big chunk, and, believe me, it’ll be parceled out to every renter. Everybody has to think very carefully on this and how it will impact. It’s a lovely project. In our lifetimes, we have “wants”, and we have “needs”. To me, the lovely Royal Theatre is a “want”. A “need” is going to be getting that sewer plant going quickly, and that is something all of us can support. Thank you.

Melissa Chavez: I wanted to add a postscript to my growing up here. On Facebook, I posted something on 8/17/2017, long before any of this was discussed. I looked at some pictures that Al Ramos put up of school class pictures. What I saw in black and white was a melting pot. I get stoked, and I get moved when I read my post. It shows up every year. It’s real to me.

Let me read this part that I posted: “The photographic collection of Guadalupe School District’s students is representative of…look at us…we’re a melting pot…Japanese, SwissItalians, Chinese, Portuguese, Filipino, Mexican, Spanish, African American, European cultures and more. We’re Guadalupe. We’re generations who stuck together through thick and thin, who endured internment camps, whose sons went off to war, whose families toiled the soil, and who stood shoulder-to-shoulder in times of national racial divide. We’re from Guadalupe…”
When I look at the folks that built this town, who persevered through the Great Depression, through two (2) recessions, through COVID, four (4) years and some folks didn’t survive, when I think of all that we’ve overcome… people who pick our crops everyday just to get through another day and come home, I think we can do this. I think we can hang tough like our forefathers and mothers did. We’ve got the goods right here. I’m a half-full kinda gal. I see the cup rising to the top and spilling over. I think we all want the same thing. We can all do it.

It’s been proven time and time again. And I think we can do it again if we want to. ________________________________________________________ Mayor Julian said, “Thank you all for being here. Again, when it comes to communication, everybody needs to be more cognizant of what we need to do, and let people know what’s going on.” The mayor asked if Mr. Brandeberry and/or Mr. Goodwin had anything further to add. Neither had additional comments.

3. ADJOURNMENT
Motion was made by Council Member Hernandez and seconded by Council Member Robles to adjourn the meeting. 4-0 Absent: 1 Costa, Jr. Motion passed. Meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m.

June 18, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Minutes Page 14 of 14 Prepared by: Approved by:
________________________________ ______________________________________ Amelia M. Villegas, City Clerk Ariston Julian, Mayor
June 25, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 10

MINUTES
City of Guadalupe
Regular Meeting of the Guadalupe City Council
Tuesday, June 25, 2024, at 6:00 pm
City Hall, 918 Obispo Street, Council Chambers

1. ROLL CALL:

Council Member Christina Hernandez
Council Member Gilbert Robles
Council Member Whitney Furness
Mayor Pro Tempore Eugene Costa Jr.

Mayor Ariston Julian
Mayor Julian called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. All members were present. (Note: The abbreviation, “CM” for “Council Member” will be used in these minutes.)

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. MOMENT OF THANKS, APPRECIATION OR CONDOLENCES.

Mayor Julian asked that there be peace in the world.

4. AGENDA REVIEW
There were no requests to change the order of the agenda.

5. PRESENTATIONS
• Highway 166/Black Road – Traffic Signal and Safety Improvements Project – Lauren Bianchi Klemann & Fred Luna, Santa Barbara County Association of Governments a. Fact Sheet -English & Spanish
(Note: go to the City’s website at www.cityofguadalupe.org to view the entire presentation.) Mr. Fred Luna, Director, Project Delivery & Construction with SBCAG, gave an overview of the Hwy166/Black Road project. Here were some of the highlights:
• Beginning in July 2024 through December 2024, traffic signalization and safety upgrades will be implemented at the intersection of Hwy166/Black Road. This is halfway between Guadalupe and Santa Maria. SBCAG presented this information to the City Council at Santa Agenda Item No. 8D
June 25, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 10 Maria, Main Street Produce, Bonita School District and other large employers with potential impact of this project.
• A new traffic signal will be in place with dedicated turning lanes on both Hwy166 and Black Road. Other improvements such as drainage and flood control and minor bike improvements will be implemented.
• Construction will be done in two (2) stages. Stage 1 involves closing Black Road for four (4) weeks. Stage 2 will involve traffic control on Hwy166 with specific detours. From Guadalupe to Santa Maria, cannot use Black Road…use Betteravia Road. • There is $2.53M from Measure A to fund this construction. • Public outreach was emphasized. In addition to advising both City Councils of Guadalupe and Santa Maria, other outreach such as postcard mailers, news media, etc. have been used. Mr. Luna said that Ms. Lauren Bianchi, who was on vacation and couldn’t attend this meeting, is working with him on the project outreach portion of this significant project.

CM Hernandez said, “I’m looking forward to the completion of this project. Could communication on this project be shared in both English and Spanish?” Mr. Luna said he’d send information to Mr.

Bodem, City Administrator.

Mayor Julian asked, “It starts July 1st?” Mr. Luna said, “Starts next Monday, July 1st.” The mayor then asked about the one-way traffic. Mr. Luna said, “During the first week, crews will be installing signs – Measure A sign showing funding, etc. Preliminary work will be done. Then on July 10th, closure of Black Road starts.”

6. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION FORUM
Requests to Speak
Molly Carrillo Walker: I’m a representative from FSA (Family Service Agency). I’ve been the ongoing co-chair for nine (9) years. FSA has provided social services to Guadalupe, Lompoc, Santa Maria and Santa Barbara for around 125 years. We get a lot of support from the community.

Leadership in organizations. Strong bond. We’re happy to serve the community. (Ms. Walker then introduced Arcelia Sención.) Ms. Sención said, “I’m the Chief Strategy-North County Programs Officer for FSA. We address sources of stress for children, parents and seniors.

We provide assistance for Self-Help People Housing as well as other resources. We provide training in skill building, strengthening families…all are done in both English and Spanish. Senior services, case management, mental health counseling. www.fsacares.org FSA responds to crises. We were here when the flood happened…working with the City and strengthening that partnership.

Courtney Cazenove then spoke saying that she’s happy to partner with FSA. I was personally affected by the flood. FSA needed a representative in Guadalupe, so here I am.

Mayor Julian said, “We’re starting up the Senior Center Advisory Committee. Mireya (Pena is to be part of the group so we’re not overlapping.”
CM Hernandez said, “Thank you for always meeting the community’s needs.” CM Robles commented that FSA has had a long-standing commitment here.

June 25, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 10 Abraham Carmona: I’m here about the softball fiasco. I’m here to apologize in public and commend Annis (Barajas). I’d recommend that there be a public calendar on the City website for reservations. (There was some confusion regarding field use being “first come-first serve” and “reservations”.) We can see who reserved what fields. Residents can just look at the website and not have to waste time calling. Good luck on the bond measure.

7. CONSENT CALENDAR (A-D)
The following items are presented for City Council approval without discussion as a single agenda item in order to expedite the meeting. Should a Council Member wish to discuss or disapprove an item, it must be dropped from the blanket motion of approval and considered as a separate item.

A. Waive the reading in full of all Ordinances and Resolutions. Ordinances on the Consent Calendar will be adopted by the same vote cast as the first meeting unless City Council indicates otherwise.

B. Approve payment of warrants for the period ending June 14, 2024.

C. Approve the Minutes of the City Council regular meeting of June 11, 2024.

D. Accept the May 2024 Financial Report.

CM Costa, Jr. asked to pull Item #7.B., Warrants. Motion was made by Council Member Costa, Jr. and seconded by Council Member Robles to approve the balance of the Consent Calendar. 5-0 Motion passed.

CM Costa, Jr. asked, “On page 28 of 66 in the warrants, there’s a reimbursement for $1,800. What was that for?” Ms. Janice Davis, Finance Director responded, “That was for Angie. She’s been using her cell phone when conducting business with the bank. The bank required her to enter a code using her cell phone. Wendy Stockton, Assistant City Attorney, had said in a workshop that personal cell phones shouldn’t be used for city business. Other individuals who had previously used their cell phones before being issued city cell phones had received a $50.00 per month allowance.

The $1,800 reimbursement is for $50 per month for a three-year period. Angie has now been issued a city cell phone to conduct city business.”
Motion was made by Council Member Costa, Jr. and seconded by Council Member Hernandez to approve Item #7.B.-Warrants. 5-0 Motion passed.

MANAGEMENT REPORTS

8. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT: (Information Only)
Mr. Bodem reported the following: The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) decided on June 20, 2024, to authorize the City of Guadalupe to construct two (2) overhead grade separations (two bridges) in the Pasadera development. The developer will pay for the two (2) bridges. The June 25, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 10 developer is also in the final stages of negotiations with Santa Maria Valley Railroad who demanded payment for upgraded railroad tracks this week. What does this mean? The developer will be able to finish the civil design work on the bridges and civil design for the sewer, water, curb, and street work on the other side of the tracks. This will ultimately give the developer the ability to start building 350 new homes. Citizens will start seeing activity in early 2025.

9. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT: (Information Only) A. Police Department report for May 2024
B. Fire Department report for May 2024
C. Code Compliance report for May 2024
Chief Cash was not present at the meeting. His monthly report is on the website. CM Hernandez asked, “I know Chief isn’t here tonight. On domestic violence, could there be a follow-up…some outreach services?”

10. HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER (Information Only)
A. Human Resources report for May 2024
Ms. Estrada, HR Manager, gave an update on recruiting. The following positions have been filled:
1) Building Attendant; 2) Senior & Community Center Activities Coordinator, and 3) Maintenance Worker. Two (2) positions are in the background phase: 1) Police Officer, and 2) Grant Administrator. An ongoing recruitment process continues for 1) Police Officer/Recruit, 2) Public Works Director and, 3) Finance Clerk.

Mayor Julian asked the name of the person filling the Senior & Community Center Activities Coordinator position. Ms. Estrada said, “His name is Isaias Rosas. His hours are 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. He started Monday, 6/24/24. He’s Spanish-speaking and has good experience working with seniors.” The mayor added that this person will do well.

Other: Negotiations with Police Officers Association (POA) has begun. Two (2) long term workers’ comp cases are ongoing. “Preventing Discrimination & harassment in the Workplace” is scheduled for September 4th and 6th for ALL employees. The OSHA mandated “Workplace Violence Prevention plan is in process.

Mayor Julian asked about the open Fire Engineer position which Chief Cash stated in his report was budgeted but unfilled. He asked, “What’s the status of that position. Has it been posted? Is there any movement on that? It needs to be filled.” Ms. Estrada said that there was no movement but that resumes were being reviewed.

REGULAR BUSINESS

11. Request by Sam Duarte, Director of The Little House by the Park, to use the Veteran’s Memorial Plaza (aka Downtown Parking Lot) for a “Safe and Sane” fireworks sale fundraiser.

Written report: Annis Barajas, Recreation Services Manager June 25, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 10 Recommendation: That the City Council approves the request by Sam Duarte for the use of the Veteran’s Memorial Plaza for a fireworks sale fundraiser and his request for the total rental fees of $2,315 be reduced by $600.

Ms. Barajas initially began to explain that the “Little House by the Park’ has requested use of the Veterans’ Memorial Plaza for the purpose of their annual sale of fireworks for 4th of July. She said, “The Recreation Services Manager and Chief Cash recommend that the City Council approve the total $2,315 in rental fees but reduced by $600 for a total of $1,715.00. ($300 off the use of the Veterans Memorial Plaza and $300 off the storage fee behind the Police Department.) Mayor Julian asked, “Was there a non-profit discount tied into this?” Ms. Barajas said, “There’s a $100 lock-in fee and then a $200 daily rate. There’s no non-profit discount for the parking lot.” The mayor said that maybe there should be. Ms. Barajas reiterated that with the reductions, the total fees come to $1,715.

CM Furness asked if all proceeds from the fireworks sale go to the Family Service Agency. Mr. Sam Duarte was present at the meeting. He came forward saying, “Yes, these monies go for parents leadership training. We started this 14 years ago. We work with the community. Parents would be trained and committed to attend meetings. Have parents involved.” Mayor Julian asked, The $600.

What will you do with that?” Mr. Duarte said that will go towards stipends for training.

Motion was made by Council Member Hernandez and seconded by Council Member Robles to approve the request for use of the Veterans Memorial Plaza and the $600 fee reduction. 5-0 Motion passed.

12. Adopt on second reading Ordinance No. 2024-520 placing a General Obligation Bond Measure on the November 5, 2024, Ballot for voter approval to finance a portion of the Royal Theater Renovation Project.

Written report: Philip F. Sinco, City Attorney
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt on the second reading, Ordinance No. 2024-520 placing a General Obligation Bond Measure on the November 5, 2024, Ballot for voter approval to finance a portion of the Royal Theater Renovation Project.

Wendy Stockton, Assistant City Attorney, presented this item in City Attorney Sinco’s absence. She said that, procedurally, this is a little different for a second reading of an ordinance. A 4-1 vote is needed to be passed.

Mr. Steve Gortler, fiscal advisor who was on zoom, gave some background on this bond measure.

Prior to doing so, he said that Dave Farmer, bond consultant, was at the meeting at City Hall,as was Thomas Brandeberry, Project Manager, also on zoom.

June 25, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 10 Mr. Gortler then continued. He said that there was a lot of information on the staff report. It will take a two-thirds vote to pass which is a “high bar” to get approved. If it does get approved, it will be the will of the people, a strong endorsement.

The cost is estimated to be $13M. We have about $10M in grant monies. The $3M gap will be funded from the bond proceeds. If approved, it will be on the December 2025 tax rolls for 30 years.

If you own a home, the average tax will be $77 per year, each year. But it depends on the assessed value of your home. For example, if your assessed value is $100,000, estimated additional property taxes would be $28…if assessed value is $200,000, estimated additional property taxes would $56, etc.

If the bond passes, the City has certain “accountability requirements” that it must follow. The primary requirement is that the “bond proceeds may be used only for the Royal Theatre Renovation project, and for no other purpose, including City employee salaries and other operating expenses”. Another important requirement is that “administrative costs shall not exceed 5% of the Bond proceeds”. Some other requirements involve financial reporting, annual audit preparation, citizens’ oversight committee, etc.

Mr. Gortler then turned things over to Mr. Brandeberry who said that there wasn’t much more to say after the June 18th special meeting. He did reiterate that the project is ready to go except for the $3M gap.

Mayor Julian said, “The driver of this process is the second reading of the ordinance.” CM Furness added, “Yes, that starts everything off.”
Requests to Speak
Melanie Becker: For clarity sake, with this bond duration of 30 years for the revitalization, it authorizes $2.99M…$185K annually x 30 years = $5,550,000. Our interest will be $2.6M. Paying a lot of interest, and the public should know that. I’m for the bond but was in favor of raising funds from rich people a year ago. The ACA1? Not two-thirds vote but rather 55%.

Mr. Gortler said, “To borrow $2.99M, there’s $2.4M interest. Will be lower…interest rates may be coming down. A dollar thirty years from now will be worth less, but your points are valid. On the ballot…will be authorized to lower for certain situations. It’s possible may be a 55% threshold. Me? I’m skeptical but think two-thirds will be required.

Then Ms. Becker again said that she’s for the bond and wish we could do some capital investing.

Denna Zamarron: (Comments here will be in Q&A format. Mr. Thomas Brandeberry will be shown as “TB”.)
DZ: On the RFP, who’s responsible for drafting it?
June 25, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 10 TB: I’m drafting the RFP for the Royal Theatre project. It will go to the City Attorney and City Administrator for approval. If approved there, would then go to the City Council.

DZ: Once approved, when can it be seen to apply?
TB: Once approved, the intent is to get operator before construction starts to be part of the process. What’s in the MOU is not available for public until it is released.

DZ: What’s the timeline to apply. There are non-profits who would want to know.

TB: About 30 days, but I’d ask the City go to 60 days.

DZ: Will there be an evaluation?
TB: Yes, the City will determine who will score applications.

DZ: If a resident is interested on being on a scoring committee, what’s needed? TB: Your experience is enough.

DZ: Will there be public access? Who’s responsible for the RFP? TB: All applications would be available for public view.

DZ: We will need to know the application site.

TB: Applications will for sure be online. City wants competition. I will create a list for applicants to be on mailing list.

Melissa Chave: This is a real good opportunity to bridge the past and the future. I’m excited about the future. I want the transition of experience with the theatre to continue with the next generations. We’re ensuring that the building is intact. It will be a money generator…a place to have celebrations. Paso Robles doesn’t have a theatre for performing arts. Here, it’s two (2) buildings in one (1)…stable theatre and a place for children to dream. I trust the next generation.

It’s about keeping Guadalupe on track. It’s a jewel, not a gateway…but a destination.

Albert Nunez, Jr.: Thank you for the time tonight. If you vote to put this bond measure on the ballot, the committee will be spending a lot of time…to be educated for a well-informed decision. In public comment, a resident wrote in saying “…and with a home valued at over $500,000 I’m not wanting to add another $200 to my tax payment. As for the Bulldogs Field of Dreams/sports complex, I’d love to support a tax increase for that project if ever needed as it aligns with my hopes/dreams for our city/children.”
In a democracy, not everyone…voice is to vote. Give our voices to vote.

Jesse Valdez: The City Clerk read an email from Jesse Valdez, received 7/20/2024: I want to make a public comment on Item #12.

First I would just like to say I really hope both projects (Royal Theatre, Bulldogs Field of Dreams) are successful and come to fruition. But as a homeowner/lifelong resident with deep roots in this city, I June 25, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 10 am not for being taxed by choice for a project like this (Royal Theatre). Times are tuff and everyone’s situation is different. Our situation, for one, has seen an over two-hundred-dollar monthly increase in mortgage/escrow payments.

And with a home valued at over $500,000 I’m not wanting to add another $200 to my tax payment. As for the Bulldogs Field of Dreams/sports complex, I’d love to support a tax increase for that project if ever needed as it aligns with my hopes/Dreams for our city/children. In all honesty, I do hope the city is able to get the funding to finish the Royal Theatre, but I will not be voting ‘yes’ on the tax increase.

Also, it’s a shame most of us would never have heard a word about it in time to attend city council meetings if it weren’t for our friends, family and fellow Guadalupe residents posting about it on social media! Pretty ridiculous if you ask me!
And what about other upcoming bonds such as the Santa Maria Joint Union High School? Times are so hard, and everyone is already overtaxed in every aspect of our lives that it’s hard to even survive comfortably these days! There needs to be a change in this course, and our city needs to look at helping improve the quality of life for our residents before trying to attract people from other areas, etc.! Sincerely, Jesse Banks
Mayor Julian asked if the Council, staff or anyone else wished to speak. There were no other comments made on this item.

Motion was made by Council Member Furness and seconded by Council Member Robles to adopt the second reading of Ordinance 2024-520 placing a General Obligation Bond Measure on the November 5, 2024, ballot for voter approval to finance a portion of the Royal Theatre Renovation Project. Roll Call: Ayes: 3 Noes: 2 Costa, Jr. and Hernandez 3-2 Motion did not pass.

13. Calling and giving notice of the general municipal election to be held on November 5, 2024, and consideration of placing a measure to approve the issuance of general obligation bonds to finance municipal improvements constituting public infrastructure of the City on the November 5, 2024, ballot, and requesting consolidation with the statewide general election and setting procedural details.

Written report: Philip F. Sinco, City Attorney
Recommendation: That the City Council:
1) Adopt Resolution No. 2024-39 calling and giving notice for the holding of a general municipal election on November 5, 2024, for the election of certain officers as required by the provisions of the laws of the state of California, and placing a measure to approve the issuance of general obligation bonds to finance municipal improvements constituting public infrastructure of the City on the November 5, 2024, ballot, and requesting that the Board of Supervisors consolidate the City's general municipal election with the statewide general election; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 2024-40 establishing regulations for candidates’ statements; and June 25, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Minutes Page 9 of 10 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2024-41 for filing written arguments and rebuttals in favor of the measure to approve the issuance of general obligation bonds to finance municipal improvements constituting public infrastructure of the City and directing the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis; and
4) By motion, authorize the Mayor or two members of the City Council to work with staff on a written argument in favor of the measure to approve the issuance of general obligation bonds to finance municipal improvements constituting public infrastructure. 5) Or, if the Ordinance No. 2024-520 was not adopted by a two-thirds majority of the City Council, adopt:

A. Alternative Resolution No. 2024-39 calling and giving notice for the holding of a general municipal election on November 5, 2024, for the election of certain officers as required by the provisions of the laws of the State of California and requesting that the Board of Supervisors consolidate the City's general municipal election with the statewide general election and requesting certain services from the County; and
Motion was made by Council member Furness and seconded by Council Member Robles to approve Resolution No. 2024-39 calling for and giving notice for the holding of a general municipal election on November 5, 2024 for the election of certain officers as required by the provisions of the laws of the State of California and requesting that the Board of Supervisors consolidate the City’s general municipal election with the statewide general election. Roll Call:

Ayes: 4 Noes: 1 Costa, Jr. 4-1 Motion passed.

B. Resolution No. 2024-40 establishing regulations for candidates’ statements.

Motion was made by Council Member Hernandez and seconded by Council Member Furness to approve Resolution No. 2024-40 establishing regulations for candidates’ statements. Roll Call:

Ayes: 4 Noes: 1 Costa, Jr. 4-0 Motion passed.

14. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Mr. Bodem requested the following items be added for the July 9th meeting:

Consent Calendar: Measure A Safe Routes to School Agreement; Water Standby charges to vacant parcels and Initiating proceedings for the annual levy of assessments Pasadera LLD.

Public Hearing: Guadalupe Benefit Assessment District and Guadalupe Lighting District.

15. ANNOUNCEMENTS – COUNCIL ACTIVITY/COMMITTEE REPORTS
CM Robles: Because the first Thursday of the month falls on the 4th of July holiday, the Food Bank will have its distribution on the following Thursday, July 11th.

June 25, 2024 City of Guadalupe Council Meeting Minutes Page 10 of 10 Mayor Julian: Thank you to Steve and Tom for being on zoom tonight. I attended an SBCAG last Thursday. There’s a lot going on in the area.

16. ADJOURNMENT
Motion was made by Council Member Hernandez and seconded by Council Member Costa, Jr. to adjourn the meeting. 5-0 Motion passed. Meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m.

Prepared by: Approved by:
______________________________ _____________________________________ Amelia M. Villegas, City Clerk Ariston Julian, Mayor
Club Comité Cívico Mexicano de
Guadalupe, Inc.

P.O. Box 729
Guadalupe, CA 93434
June 24, 2024
City Council of Guadalupe
City of Guadalupe
Dear City Council Members and Mayor Ariston Julian
Club Comité Cívico Mexicano de Guadalupe requests your approval and support for our Annual Fiestas Patrias Celebration in Guadalupe to be held on Sunday, September 15, 2024. We thank you for helping us celebrate our 100th year Anniversary last year. We look forward to the community’s participation as we once again celebrate our traditional Fiestas.

The traditional Parade will take place starting at Fifth and Guadalupe Streets and ending at LeRoy Park.

The Cal Trans Encroachment Permit for the parade will be submitted in the next few days. As required by Cal Trans, your City Engineer will need to review and approve the application before its submittal. I will be meeting with your City Public Safety Officer Michael Cash to review the plan and address any concerns he may have.

Once again, thank you for your support and we look forward to working with you to make this celebration a successful event.

José J. Nichols, President
Cc., Todd Bodem, City Manager
Michael Cash, Public Safety Officer
Agenda Item No. 8E

Agenda Item No. 8F

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GUADALUPE
Agenda of July 9, 2024

________________________________ __________________________________ Prepared by: Approved by:

Jeff van den Eikhof, City Engineer Todd Bodem, City Administrator SUBJECT: Cooperative Agreement for Safe Routes to School Bicycle and Pedestrian Program RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2024-41 approving a Cooperative Agreement with SBCAG to receive funding from Measure A for the 11th Street Safe Routes to School Project and authorizing the Mayor to sign the agreement on behalf of the City.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Guadalupe applied for funding for the 11th Street Safe Routes to School Project during Cycle 3 of the Measure A North County Safe Routes to School Bicycle and Pedestrian Program. The 11th Street Safe Routes to School Project is for pedestrian and bicycle improvements on 11th Street from the eastern edge of the Escalante Meadows development to the Mary Buren Elementary School parking lot.

The SBCAG Board approved funding for the project on June 18, 2020, for Measure A funds.

DISCUSSION:

To receive the Measure A funds, the City of Guadalupe must enter into a Cooperative Agreement with SBCAG. The Agreement was signed by SBCAG on June 16, 2022.

SBCAG Staff notified the City Engineer that this agreement has never been signed by the City of Guadalupe.

The Agreement is now being brought to the City Council for approval and signature by the Mayor. Once executed, the City can request reimbursement for eligible costs.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Approval of the resolution will result in insignificant impacts to the general fund.The City’s project funding match is covered by existing Measure A funding.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution No. 2024-41

2. Measure A Project Cooperative Agreement
Jeff van den Eikhof

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-41

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GUADALUPE APPROVING A COOPERATIVE

AGREEMENT WITH SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SBCAG) FOR THE

GUADALUPE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SIDEWALK PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Guadalupe is eligible to receive funding for the Guadalupe Junior High School Sidewalk Project from Cycle 4 of the Measure A North County Safe Routes to School Bicycle and Pedestrian Program; and
WHEREAS, a Cooperative Agreement between the City of Guadalupe and SBCAG must be executed before such funds can be reimbursed by the Measure A North County Safe Routes to School Bicycle and Pedestrian Program.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Guadalupe, as follows:

SECTION 1: The Cooperative Agreement between the City of Guadalupe and SBCAG is hereby approved.

SECTION 2: The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the Cooperative Agreement and any amendments thereto with the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments on behalf of the City.

SECTION 3: The City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the City Clerk shall consult with the City Administrator and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting on the 9th day of July 2024 by the following vote:

MOTION:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

I, Amelia M. Villegas, City Clerk of the City of Guadalupe DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 2024-41, has been duly signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of the City Council, held July 9, 2024, and that same was approved and adopted.

ATTEST:
______________________________ ____________________________________ Amelia M. Villegas, City Clerk Ariston Julian, Mayor
ATTACHMENT 1

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________
Philip F. Sinco, City Attorney
ATTACHMENT 2
Measure A Project
Cooperative Agreement
  




 






 


!"#"$
$ % &'("$")(

%*&)
+' ,


"!(

 ,(* &
"'
(
! 
,)-%&)
"*$
$
! %"*."/ 01234556789:2;7<=877>7?:@A<=877>7?:AB237?:787C2?:5DE9?CD7:F77?:1742:E5G HI9C9JI67@AK65?358AB9?C:17K<L0<M<NM<N<4OPL0Q<KKO4R<0ROLOSHOTUNLVUL0KW9X:2?= 93:17K9?:9M98D98945I?:EY5X9J089?3658:9:25?<I:1582:E@A<I:1582:EA58ZKM4<H[B\  
]
 ^_


W<I:1582:E9?CK65?358C73287:57?:782?:594556789:2;7<=877>7?::5 X558C2?9:7:17GI?C2?=5G:89?3658:9:25?2>685;7>7?:32?K9?:9M98D98945I?:E6I83I9?::5:17 9I:1582:E685;2C7CDE:17N59CN76928W089GG2XN7J27G9?C089?3658:9:25?K9G7:EV793I87@ZV793I87 <[BWF12X1F9396685;7CDE:17;5:7835GK9?:9M98D98945I?:E5?L5;7>D78`Wabbcd9?C ^_ 

W:17K65?3581936856537C:19::17<I:1582:E685;2C7GI?C2?=G85>:17V793I87 <L58:145I?:EK9G7N5I:73:5KX155JM2XEXJ79?Ce7C73:829?e85=89>367X2G27C17872?@Ze85=89>[B :5K65?358f3685g7X:3G58:17698:2XIJ98:89?3658:9:25?2>685;7>7?:685g7X:F58h367X2G27C17872? @Ae85g7X:A58Ze85g7X:3[Bd9?C ^_ 

W:17<I:1582:E193C7:78>2?7C:19::17e85g7X:237J2=2DJ79396685;7CDE:17 KM4<HM598C5?iI?7abWaba`G58V793I87<GI?C3d9?C ^_ 

W:17<I:1582:E239I:1582j7C:5233I7V793I87<GI?C3:5K65?358G587J2=2DJ7 685g7X:3d9?C ^_ 

W:17<I:1582:E9?CK65?358C73287:519;7:123<=877>7?:378;793:17 <=877>7?:G58:17<I:1582:E:5685;2C7V793I87<GI?C2?=:5K65?358G587J2=2DJ7e85g7X:3 6856537CDEK65?358W685;2C7C:19:3IX1GI?C2?=193D77?9I:1582j7CDE:17M598C5G:17 <I:1582:E\ ^W_


W2?X5?32C789:25?5G:17>I:I9J685>23739?CI?C78:9h2?=317872?>9C7 9?C:17>I:I9JD7?7G2:3:5D7C782;7C:1787G85>W:17698:2731787:58768737?:WX5;7?9?:W9?C 9=87793G5JJ5F3k

 l
*"* !'

*! 
017K65?358319JJk m\me85g7X:n73X826:25?\017e85g7X:C73X826:25?W3X5675GF58hWC7J2;78E3X17CIJ7W73:2>9:75G X53:DE9X:2;2:EW9?:2X269:7C9>5I?:9?C:E675GGI?C3:19:F2JJ3I66J7>7?:V793I87<GI?C3W 9?C:179?:2X269:7C:2>2?=G5887J79375GV793I87<GI?C3987367X2G27C2?Uo12D2:<9::9X17C :5:123<=877>7?:9?C2?X586589:7C17872?DE87G787?X7\K65?358319JJD735J7JE87365?32DJ7 G582>6J7>7?:2?=9?CX988E2?=5I::17e85g7X:\   











 !

! " "#$
!
#
# 

%$
&

!
#




"
'
'$!(



#
)&


%  !

! " 
'!#'# #!*# 

%$!
#

&

+$
% &


# 

#

'!#
''#&$$ "


,-

! .
'!#'

-

! 

"
$
-/
!

'! 

%$"'
'
'!
#

##(


%  /

#$

/#
"

'!
$$

!  
'!#'


0 1#
("
$
1#
"#$

!

%
$$!
#
 (
"
-/
!


2
"1#
"#$
 ! 1#
&
)

%/
!
+$ /$  #
'#&
'/
!

-
%
#!'
$!(
 ! 
'!#$!
#


#
/$ 1#
'# &
/
!

(
'
"#$ !#$
"'
$" 


3%
$.

(
 #!'
'
4# 

$
%
"&5'
$
&
'#
$
$
$!(6

7 6$8#
9+
9 0
2$#' 
 #$" &


"
$
"'
:

3 %

2(
 
%
$
#
&
;
<
" 
%
 #!'
$(
!%+#!+# + #!# 



$!5#
$#'
*#
$ #

$
$
$
"&
(
#!'

%



3 !.


 
 #$!
"$


"#" 
 #$
&5'
$$
2
#'''!
 #$$ 
%
#!'
$
#
!$
%



=>"?#$
2(
 #/

1#
"#$
&
 $



-/
!



'

%$!
#

##(




@(#!'
 "#'
2(
 
%
$


#
" /#$   $
!$
-/
!



'$ (


,

%$!
#

##(


2(
 
 $


""
%;3<

$" &
'

"


A
'

"
(
 !

! "'

' #""#$ $$


$
-/
!


>#$"#$
''$&
! ""
$$!'$%
! !
#
"
''

 

 #!*#"#$
 
(
 
%
$''"#  $
%

+
 #$


!

"$# +
' #""#$+!#$
  


















 


















!



! " 
 


#

$
%
 $
&

'
()
*


+

,
-*


'
(
*


#




 


'
(
*




" 














*



  

.


 

'
( 

*

'
(* 

*



,

!
 
/!
0'
(








! !*


+




*







*

*#








 "*






!" 


+


*

1 *
 

" 
2'

*3 



 45657
*
8
.

9:


;




" 
2)
<'

* 3 



*
8
.



#


*
1 

:



 
 $%*







 
-*



*




 


*






'
(

 
$&*




 

'
(
 9:


1 

!


=
)

# !

)
** 

*

**




#>)"3>


 " 
*
:






*
 




*




*













:




 *

!






#




 

( :



:






:
 








! 

:




 *









!
*







!


!






 " 
2)
<'

*3 



 $
?' !
@ 


#




!




*




*





 !





  !








*

'
(


*







#









 !








 *




 *

 !







 !




 


" 


 !




* 

*




 
*

*#




*




 *

 !



* 

*







*

*#



 $
$A'



#

#











" 
2'
(#
 3 




#






!#>)"3>



"  $&%A$$





 $
$$)
#



9:)
 $
$$

)
#


"'
(
!


!#




" 

 
*





!





9:!"
 "*




!" 
 


#

$
%





*





" 



B
 "

*
C 

**
!" 




!

(

  






 !" 

# #$
!% !" 
 

&'
 (
'
)

!  )  & 

*
 ''
'
& 

+


,   )





!'



  $
)

 !

!''
'
& 

+
-!) .
#)  )  & 

*
! !!) 
)

 !

!&'

 
$

( #
('
& 

+
-&'

/!! ) )
 '
' "
 $#
(
&!#$
!
 )) ( ) $''

((
0
'
 )
 #
(&'



+


1!  
-&'
  $(! 
!$')


$$
 ('
(
! %  $)
   !$)
!(%



2


 

  ')(%


%
!  !! 
$
     ! (
$(!$





*3   )4

.

&'
$
)
 

)
 

% !
%/ '!%
/
 %'
! %)%
''
'
$ 
0 )
!'' 
)
%%

  
('
)
! !'%'
% '
) !
%
 $ 


 


5 !'! )



&'
!( !'!



 
$'
 
$ 0 '
)    $

#
 
6789:;<:: 8=>?@A@BC=DEFBG=HIBJ -#
(K +

, !

!
(!
-#
(!L
 !

!'(! &'

 !'! $'
( $'


$
'

5)
 $



 "  5M()
 ')  ' )  

# #$
!% '"
'(! 

'
  )

$
'+


$+

5  +

 $

-#
(


$



)

 !

!'(!&'
 )     $

 +

&' ), !

!
)#
(
! (   
"
%
L''
 $'
$

'
%#
(

  &'
"    '   $
 )


'
'
!(% ) %" "!L   ' )
'(!
-&'
!(
2
!   )
'(!)

  























 

 




!













 





"








#



 








#




$
%
 $
%
!
%&



'




"
(


 





 !


(



##






 


 $
%
!
$!


 )


*#


!







" 




(


 







 
(


+,
)
!


 )


"




* 



!


#





-.
!






 
#







 $
%
!
/(


01
2



*#



(






 


 
!

!


 )






 !
 !


(


01
#


 

*#
1





 




-.




!
"
(


 





!






#





-.
*#
 1










-.



!
"

 (


 





!






#

 


 $
%
!
34



#4

1


5 
!





"


 










!

 





#

 




1




 $
$(


06

 

7

(


0#






!8
 




!
6
8

!






 



# (


0



9






!








 




 $
/4
)(
:4

;





(


 




 
# 
0







(










# 

#

-<.




#



#
(



 $
34



 





(





"

9
"

 #

 


-
 




!







(


 !
.




!
(





0

#

#
(









 



#
!





!


6
8
 2





 

 


#

#




#



 #
6
8


  

 
 


!

"#$%&'% '"())*%!!&*$ +% !(&*,&(**% -(&*.,/"/"01*)234,-),&' (&-/"-),5 1'*"-4)'/+% /",&67",8,/9 
"9: !&/'"()) !(,&,&++*/4&/,) -,'*"( :-% / !,&(/-('$ %5,--,&#*/,%& ;% #*/,%&

2<4&)''%/" .,'-, */- 81#=093% 4&)''( ), / !,&(/-  
; >,'*"( :

",'9: !&/'"())8'48?*//%-,'*"( :('+%))%.'@  ;
(
!,&(/,%&

!,&(/,%&%+/",'9: !&/!(18!(-A
B4$%&CD-(1'. ,//& &%/,*/%/"%/" $( /1E% A;B(/(&1/,!81!4/4()*%&'&/%+/"$( /,'  
;
8>,'*"( :F$%&0%!$)/,%&%+G %?*/'
67*$/('/%(&1 ,:"/'% %8),:(/,%&'.",*" '4 5,5-,'*"( :(''$*,+,-,&#*/,%&

</",'9: !&/'"())8-,'*"( :-<(&- /"$( /,''"())"(5&%+4 /" %8),:(/,%&/%(*"%/" <4$%&*%!$)/,%&%+/" G %?*/'('* /,+,-81/"94/"% ,/1  
 H&-!&,/1
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

2 K%/,*'
9&1&%/,*.",*"!(18 L4, -4&- /",'9: !&/'"())8,&. ,/,&:(&-'"()) 8:,5&81$ '%&()' 5,*<% 81* /,+,-%  :,'/ -!(,)< /4 & *,$/ L4'/-</% /"(-- ''''/+% /"8)%.@ 9F MNOH
P #(&/(=( 8( (0%4&/19''%*,(/,%&%+3%5 &!&/' ;QCK% /"#(&9&/%&,%O%(-<#4,/= #(&/(=( 8( (<09R

C #GNK#NO 0,/1%+34(-()4$ R
SN8,'$%#/
GN=%7RCS 34(-()4$<09R22
6,/" $( /1!(1*"(&:,/'(-- ''81:,5,&:&%/,*%+'4*"*"(&:/%/"%/" $( /1,&/" !(&& $ %5,--,&/",'#*/,%& 2 9))N/" K%/,*'(&-*%&'&/'4&- /",''*/,%&<.",*" ( '&/81!(,)<'"())8-!-/%8 *,5-+,5ATB-(1'+%))%.,&:/", -$%',/,&/" F #
!(,)

",'K%/,*''*/,%&'"())&%/8*%&'/ 4-('!(&,&:/"(/,/" $( /1(: '/% ' 5,*%+$ %*''7*$/(' L4, -81($$),*(8))(.  
T 9--,/,%&()9*/'(&->%*4!&/'
6(*"$( /1(: '/%-%())'4*"/",&:'(&-/(U())'4*" (*/,%&'<(&-/%!(U<7*4/(&--),5 '4*"%/" -%*4!&/'(&-,&'/ 4!&/'<(''"())8 ('%&(8)1 L4'/-/%*( 1%4//"$ %5,',%&'<,&/&/(&-$4 $%'%+/"9: !&/ 
  






  !


"#
#$
## #
%#
&

' $ &&
 (
(%&
#

 


) $
& %$#$$$
$%& & 
#(
$ &$ & *
&
'

%#

$
$#

%$#$$#
$ &&%#


$
#
' %


+ ",-
$$ &

! '#%#
% .
&/$
$  %
%% %&(%&

0$ 01

%%
%%'
$$$ $%&#



&


2 
& $#
$#&
$#%$$ & &&
(


&


34 5$0


%%  $

67#67 
67
&
& 
'%% 
$ .#
#&
%$ '$$ ' 

33 0' %&
0%$&
 $$ 

 %#'%$#  &$&
&
&#
$%% 


'%$&
$


%%

%%

 $


8'$$#$

# (
$#  %&$'






39 :
& (
$
$%% 



'

' $ &%%
8

%% $$% %%
%%
% $



3  0''%

%%
'%%''$
;

3 0
0#
%%

%%''$
;0
 3

6 %%&
$-!
7#0
3
)6 %'$
 $
$7#0
3
+6 %
-!
7


3 &
&#
%%

%%''$
; 0
9

6
$
$7

  






 


!""#
 $%


&#'()


* +'



 
!(!#'
 ',
(
 !!(-
!#!.



#,#
, 
#"##(/!
0

(!(- 
(



 ,#!

,
#'#!##

 '

(


!(-
(
!#1
!(

'
( 
(%#


!

!


0


(2
"&34)
5 #(
!

 #!( '

 #'#'#
/


# !###'



 !""
(
!!
 
!#1
(1
1

% 
#(




(
"#( '


(!,
!
 
 '


4 6'
6'#




 '#
#


" 


'





7 8'#9!'!
"
:'#(


'#"##
 ' 

#'#,

!"!


!'!
"


'#

;!(
 <
'#(


!# "
!







#(




= 


+

6 '

 "#(#
!##

# 

#




%
9





9(

*>!#
 
#(




? 9
6
 '

"

(#
  '
6
#(
(
''

("
 ' #





!

(
"


@ :9! A"
6
"(((
(

(
"
  '


!
! 
"
"
(!;!

  
("
 '


3B :8 6#
:  ','
###

( '#!#(
 '(#( (  '## "#
 
 

(
( #((( '

("
 ' "( #(( 
! 
" (( '


3  % -A(
<
(


!

(!.##
' '

(#
#( !#  !#( ' #(#(
'#"! ,
!
 '(
(
 

Agenda Item No. 8G

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GUADALUPE
Agenda of July 9, 2024

_______________________________ _________________________________ Prepared by: Approved by:

Jeff van den Eikhof, City Engineer Todd Bodem, City Administrator SUBJECT: Initiating proceeding for the annual levy of assessment for the Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-42, initiating proceedings for the annual levy of assessments for the Pasadera Landscape and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.

2. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-43, approving the Engineer’s Report for the Pasadera Landscape and Lighting District and declaring the City Council intent to levy assessments.

BACKGROUND:

The California Streets and Highway Code allows for the creation of Landscape and Lighting Districts (“Districts”) to fund the continued operations and maintenance of local parks and landscaping and lighting improvements within the Districts. The formation of Districts allows for the levy and collection of annual assessments on the County tax rolls from property within the District that benefits from the improvements.

Pasadera is a large residential and commercial subdivision located in the southern portion of Guadalupe.

Pasadera includes (802) single-family residences, (21.5) acres of commercial development, and a (14.37) acre school site. See Attachment 1 - District Diagram – Pasadera planned Improvements. The subdivision includes drainage basins, parks, street landscaping, and lighting, two (planned) bridges over the railroad tracks, and other amenities.

The City Council held a Public Hearing for establishing the Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District (“District”) per the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 on October 10, 2017.

Immediately following the hearing, ballots from the landowners were counted for the establishment of the District. Following the owner's approval, the City Council adopted a Resolution approving the formation of the District, confirming the Engineer’s Report, the Assessment Diagram, and related assessments.

Jeff van den Eikhof

DISCUSSION:

An Engineer’s Report for the District must be produced prior to each fiscal year to detail the proposed improvements and services to be provided by the District and the levy and collection of annual assessments for the fiscal year. The City hired Willdan Financial Services to produce the Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2024/2025. (See Attachment 3). The annual assessments, which are calculated in the attached Engineer’s Report, will provide funding for the net special benefit costs and expenses that are necessary to service and maintain the local parks, landscaping, and lighting improvements built with the development of properties within the District.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The Engineer’s report calculated the cost to the property owners to operate and maintain the constructed parks, landscaping, and lighting improvements per Equivalent Benefit Unit within the Districts annually as follows:

Zone A (Commercial Property along SR 166, Main Street): $21.49 (last year was $21.49) Sub-Zone B1 (Subdivided Residential Property): $444.00 (last year was $444.00) Sub-Zone B2 (Non-Subdivided Residential Property north of Railroad): $4.79 (last year was $4.79) Sub-Zone B3 (Non-Subdivided Residential Property south of Railroad): $20.00 (last year was $20.00) The annual Engineer’s Report calculates the costs based on the number of lots subdivided and the total cost to operate and maintain the covered improvements in the District. The FY 2024/25 assessments are proposed to remain the same as the previous assessment for FY 23/24.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. District Diagram – Pasadera planned Improvements

2. Resolution No. 2024-42, initiating proceedings for the annual levy of assessments for the Pasadera Landscape and Lighting District for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.

3. Preliminary Engineer’s Report for the Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District, Fiscal Year 2024/2025

4. Resolution No. 2024-43, approving the Engineer’s Report for the Pasadera Landscape and Lighting District and declaring the City Council intent to levy assessments Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

District Diagram – Boundary and Zones, Fiscal Year 2024/2025 ATTACHMENT 1

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-42

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GUADALUPE, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING

PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS FOR THE PASADERA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Guadalupe, California, has, by previous Resolutions, formed the Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District (herein referred to as the “District”) pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “1972 Act”), that provides for levy and collection of assessments by the County of Santa Barbara for the City of Guadalupe to pay the maintenance and services of landscaping, lighting, appurtenant facilities and operations related thereto; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services for the purpose of assisting with the annual levy of the District, and to prepare and file a report with the City Clerk in accordance with the 1972 Act; and
WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report, which describes the District and improvements and includes the proposed budgets and assessments for Fiscal Year 2024/2025; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully examined and reviewed the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report as presented and is preliminarily satisfied with the District, each of the budget items and documents as set forth therein, and is satisfied that the proposed assessments contained therein, have been spread in accordance with the benefits received from the improvements, operation, maintenance, and services to be performed within the District, as set forth in said Report; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Guadalupe as follows:

SECTION 1: The City Council hereby approves the Engineer’s Report on a preliminary basis as submitted or amended by direction of this City Council, and orders said Report to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection, and by reference the Engineer’s Report is made part of this resolution; and SECTION 2: The City Council hereby orders Willdan Financial Services to file the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report concerning the levy of assessments for the District in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22622 of the 1972 Act with the City Clerk of the City of Guadalupe.

SECTION 3: The improvements within the District may include any improvements, expenses, and services authorized pursuant to the 1972 Act, including, but not limited to, the maintenance, operation, and servicing of local street lighting, parks, and various landscaping improvements established in connection with the development of the properties within the District, and which shall be maintained for the special benefit of those properties. The maintenance and servicing of the improvements generally ATTACHMENT 2

include, but are not limited to, the materials, equipment, utilities, labor, and incidental expenses, including administrative expenses, required for annual operation, as well as the performance of periodic repairs and replacement activities as needed to provide for the growth, health, and beauty of the parks and landscaping within specified public areas, rights-of-way and/or dedicated easements, the proper operation and functioning of related amenities including, irrigation and drainage systems, specified fencing, hardscapes; sports courts and fields; playground equipment and structures; sidewalks, ornamental or safety lighting; benches, trash receptacles; drinking fountains, picnic facilities and any other equipment, structures or facilities related to the parks and/or landscape areas; and the proper operation of the public street lights and street lighting system within the public rights-of-way which may include, but is not limited to the furnishing of electric current or other illuminating agent; as needed maintenance, repair, and replacement of worn out electrical components and light fixtures, including bulbs, ballasts, photoelectric cells, meters, electrical cables; repair or replacement of damaged poles, ground wires, and conduits caused by accidents, vandalism, time, and weather; and monitoring of the Underground Service Alert (USA) network to prevent damage by excavation.

SECTION 4: The District as outlined in the Engineer’s Report at the time of formation, incorporates Zones of benefit as authorized in accordance with Chapter 1, Sections 22568 and 22570 of the 1972 Act, which are designated as:

Zone A
Zone B, including Sub-Zone B1, Sub-Zone B2, and Sub-Zone B3 SECTION 5. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained. In doing so, the City Clerk shall consult with the City Administrator and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting on the 9th day of July 2024 by the following vote:

MOTION:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

RECUSED:

I, Amelia M. Villegas, City Clerk of the City of Guadalupe, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 2024-42, has been duly signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of the City Council, held July 9, 2024, and that same was approved and adopted.

ATTEST:
___________________________________ __________________________________ Amelia M. Villegas, City Clerk Ariston Julian, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
Philip F. Sinco, City Attorney

CITY OF GUADALUPE
Engineer’s Report
Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025
Intent Meeting: June 11, 2024
Public Hearing: June 25, 2024

CITY OF GUADALUPE
918 OBISPO STREET
GUADALUPE, CA 93434
MAY 2024

PREPARED BY

WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES
27368 Via Industria
Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590
T. 951.587.3500|800.755.6864
F. 951.587.3510|888.326.6864
Property Tax Information Line
T.866.807.6864
www.willdan.com
ATTACHMENT 3

ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
City of Guadalupe
Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Annual Levy of Assessments for
Fiscal Year 2024/2025
City of Guadalupe,
County of Santa Barbara, State of California
As part of the Resolution of Intention packet presented for the consideration of the Guadalupe City Council, this Report and the enclosed budgets, diagrams, and descriptions outline the improvements, estimated expenses and annual assessments to be collected on the County tax rolls in fiscal year 2024/2025 for the Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District, which includes each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land within said District, as the same existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of each parcel within the Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District and incorporates all subsequent subdivisions, lot-line adjustments, or parcel changes therein. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.

Dated this ________ day of ______________, 2024.

Willdan Financial Services
Assessment Engineer
On Behalf of the City of Guadalupe
By: ________________________________
Jim McGuire
Principal Consultant
By: ________________________________
Tyrone Peter
PE # C 81888
Table of Contents
Introduction...............................................................................................1 Report Content and Annual Proceedings................................................................ 1 Part I — Plans and Specifications ...........................................................5 Description of the District......................................................................................... 5 Zones of Benefit ........................................................................................................ 5 Description of the District Improvements ............................................................. 10 Part II — Method of Apportionment.......................................................16 Legislative Authority and Provisions..................................................................... 16 Benefit Analysis....................................................................................................... 17 Assessment Methodology ...................................................................................... 21 Part III – Estimate of Costs.....................................................................28 Calculation of Assessments................................................................................... 28 Zone Budgets and Assessments ........................................................................... 29 Assessment Range Formula .................................................................................. 31 Part IV — Assessment Roll ....................................................................32 Part V — District Diagrams ....................................................................33 District Diagram – Boundary and Zones, Fiscal Year 2023/2024......................... 34 District Diagram –Development and Improvements Proposed at Buildout........ 35 District Diagram – Development and Improvements, Fiscal Year 2023/2024..... 36 Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Introduction
On October 10, 2017, the City Council of the City of Guadalupe, County of Santa Barbara, State of California (the “City”), under the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “1972 Act”) and the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIII D (the “Constitution”), formed the City’s maintenance assessment district designated as:

Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
(hereafter referred to as the “District”), and established the maximum assessments determined to be necessary to support and maintain various landscaping and lighting improvements that will provide special benefits to properties within the District which includes all lots and parcels of land within the planned non-residential and residential development area identified in the DJ Farms Specific Plan and commonly referred to as the Pasadera development (hereafter referred to as the “Pasadera Development”) located on the south side of Main Street near Obispo Street and Flower Avenue.

Report Content and Annual Proceedings
This “Engineer’s Annual Report Fiscal Year 2024/2025” (the “Report”) has been prepared pursuant to Chapter 1, Article 4 and Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act, and presented to the City Council for their consideration and approval of the proposed improvements and services to be provided within the District and the levy and collection of annual assessments related thereto for fiscal year 2024/2025.

This Report outlines the District structure, the improvements, and the proposed assessments to be levied in connection with the special benefits the properties will receive from the maintenance and servicing of the District improvements for the fiscal year. The annual assessments to be levied on properties within the District will provide funding for the continued operation and maintenance of the local parks, landscaping and lighting improvements within the District and zones of benefit (“Zones”) established herein, which provide special benefits to the properties within the District and each respective Zone.

To adequately provide and fund the parks, landscaping and lighting improvements constructed and installed in connection with the development of properties within the District for fiscal year 2024/2025, the City Council has determined that it is appropriate and in the public’s best interest to levy annual assessments on the County tax rolls for the benefit of properties therein to fund the estimated special benefit improvement costs that are considered necessary to maintain and service the improvements. Furthermore, the improvements to be provided and funded in whole or in part by the District assessments are consistent with the development plans and specifications for the Pasadera Development and the overall improvements outlined in the DJ Farms Specific Plan which are on file in the Office of Public Works of the City of Guadalupe and by reference these plans, and specifications are made part of this Report.

Each Zone (incorporating the sub-zones therein) outlined in this Report is a reflection of the various improvements and the types of improvements and services to be provided by the District for the properties that are directly associated with and benefit from those improvements. The net annual cost to provide the improvements in each Zone is based on the various improvements and the types of improvements and services to be provided by the District for the properties that are directly associated with and benefit from those improvements and the net cost of providing those improvements and services are allocated to the benefiting properties within the Zones using a Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

weighted method of apportionment (refer to Assessment Methodology in “Part II — Method of Apportionment”) that calculates the proportional special benefit and assessment for each parcel as compared to other properties that benefit from the District improvements and services. The improvements to be provided by the District and the assessments described herein are made pursuant to the 1972 Act and the provisions of the California Constitution and the District shall incorporate each parcel that will receive special benefits from those improvements.

The estimated cost of the improvements and the proposed annual assessments budgeted and assessed against properties within the District and each respective Zone may include, but are not limited to the estimated expenditures for regular annual maintenance and repairs; incidental expenditures related to the operation and administration of the District; the collection of funds for operational reserves or for periodic maintenance and improvement rehabilitation projects; deficits or surpluses from prior fiscal years; and revenues from other sources as authorized by the 1972 Act. Each parcel is to be assessed proportionately for only those improvements, services, and expenses for which the parcel will receive special benefit. Each fiscal year, the City shall establish the District’s assessments based on an estimate of the costs to maintain, operate and service the improvements for that fiscal year and available revenues including fund balances, general benefit contributions, any additional contributions from other revenue sources, and the assessment limits established for the District and Zones.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s Office. The Santa Barbara County Auditor/Controller uses APNs and specific Fund Numbers to identify properties to be assessed on the tax roll for the District assessments.

At a noticed annual Public Hearing, the City Council will accept all public comments and written protests regarding the District and the annual levy of assessments. Based on those public comments and written protests, the City Council may order amendments to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the Report and confirmation of the assessments the Council will, by Resolution, order the improvements to be made and confirm the levy and collection of assessments for the fiscal year pursuant to the 1972 Act. The fiscal year 2024/2025 assessments as approved will be submitted to the Santa Barbara Auditor/Controller to be included on the property tax roll for each parcel.

As required by the 1972 Act, this Engineer’s Report outlines the plans and specifications for the improvements which describes the improvements to be provided, maintained and serviced by the District; an estimate of the costs of the improvements (budget); an assessment of the estimated costs of the improvements which outlines the proportional method of apportioning the estimated annual costs as well as the resulting proposed assessments to be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel within the District for fiscal year 2024/2025; and a diagram for the assessment district, which depicts the boundaries of the District and all parcels receiving special benefit.

If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, portion, zone, or subzone of this Report is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of the Report and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, portion, zone, or subzone thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, portions, zones, or subzones might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

This Report consists of the following five (5) parts.

Part I — Plans and Specifications:

This section provides a general description of the District and the improvements for which parcels are assessed. The assessments outlined in this Report are based on the improvements and appurtenant facilities that provide special benefits to the properties within the District and generally consist of local parks, various landscaping improvements, street lighting, and related appurtenant facilities and operational expenses authorized pursuant to the 1972 Act. The plans and specifications contained in this Report generally describe the nature and extent of the improvements to be provided at build-out of the District, and specifically those improvements that have been installed and may be accepted and maintained for fiscal year 2024/2025. In conjunction with these general descriptions of the improvements, visual depictions of the landscaping and lighting improvements that have been installed and may be accepted for maintenance for fiscal year 2024/2025 as well as the overall improvements anticipated at buildout are provided in “Part V — Assessment Diagrams” of this Report. More detailed information regarding the specific plans and specifications associated with these improvements are on file in the Office of Public Works of the City of Guadalupe and by reference are made part of this Report.

Part II — Method of Apportionment
This section includes a discussion of the general and special benefits associated with the various improvements to be provided within the District (Benefit Analysis), which includes a discussion of the proportional costs of the special benefits and a separation of costs considered to be of general benefit (and therefore not assessed). This section of the Report also outlines the method of calculating each property’s proportional special benefit and resulting calculated annual assessment amount. This method of apportionment is consistent with the adopted method of apportionment for the District at the time the District was formed and approved by the property owners of record in a protest ballot proceeding conducted pursuant to the provisions of the California Constitution Article XIII D.

Part III — Estimate of Costs
This section establishes an estimate of the fiscal year 2024/2025 costs to operate, maintain, and service the local parks, landscaping, lighting, and appurtenant facilities that have been installed and may be accepted and maintained for the special benefit of properties within the District. The budget for the District and each Zone therein (including the various sub-zones) incorporates an estimate of the maintenance costs and incidental expenses including, but not limited to labor, materials, utilities, equipment, and administration expenses as well as the collection of other appropriate funding authorized by the 1972 Act and deemed necessary to fully support the improvements. Those improvements and/or costs determined to be of general benefit shall be funded by a City contribution and are excluded from the amount to be assessed as special benefit.

The resulting assessment rates (the “Assessment Per EBU”) identified in the budget for each Zone establishes the proposed assessments to be levied and collected for fiscal year 2024/2025.

Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Part IV — Assessment Roll
The assessment amounts to be levied and collected in fiscal year 2024/2025 for each parcel is based on the parcel’s calculated proportional special benefit as outlined in “Part II — Method of Apportionment” and the annual assessment rates established by the estimated budgets in “Part III — Estimate of Costs” of this Report. Due to the number of parcels within the District, the Assessment Roll for fiscal year 2024/2025 has been filed electronically with the City Clerk rather than displayed in this Report. The parcels and assessment amounts contained within the electronic Assessment Roll filed with the City Clerk represents the parcels and assessment amounts to be filed with the Santa Barbara County Auditor/Controller and collected on the County Tax Rolls for fiscal year 2024/2025. By reference the listing of the Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and the corresponding assessment amounts are made part of this Report.

Part V — District Diagrams
This section of the Report contains various diagram(s) that identify the parcels and improvements within the District including:
➢ District Diagram – Boundary and Zones, Fiscal Year 2024/2025 ➢ District Diagram – Development and Improvements, Planned at Buildout ➢ District Diagram – Development and Improvements, Fiscal Year 2024/2025 The lines and dimensions of each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land contained in the “District Diagram – Boundary and Zones, Fiscal Year 2024/2025” is inclusive of all parcels identified in “Part IV – Assessment Roll” of this Report and the corresponding County Assessor’s Parcel Maps for said parcels as they existed at the time this Report was prepared and shall include all subsequent subdivisions, lot-line adjustments, or parcel changes therein. Reference is hereby made to the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of each lot and parcel of land within the District.

Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Part I — Plans and Specifications
Description of the District
The territory within the District consists of the lots or parcels of land within the planned nonresidential and residential development area identified in the DJ Farms Specific Plan and commonly referred to as the “Pasadera Development” which is located within the City of Guadalupe on the south side of Main Street near Obispo Street and Flower Avenue. According to the DJ Farms Specific Plan, at build-out, the District is anticipated to incorporate eight hundred and three (803) single-family residential home sites; approximately twenty-one (21.49) acres of non-residential development; a fourteen (14.37) acre school site; and various associated public areas, easements, and rights-of-way that are either part of the District improvements or otherwise considered to receive no special benefit from the improvements being provide. At the time this Report was prepared, the lots and parcels of land within the District are inclusive of the following parcels identified on the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s Parcel Maps as:
➢ Book 113, Page 01, Parcels 25 and 37;
➢ Book 113, Page 08, Parcels 34 through 37;
➢ Book 113, Page 45, Parcels 01 through 03, 06 through 08, and 10; ➢ Book 113, Page 46, Parcels 01 through 57;
➢ Book 113, Page 47, Parcels 01 through 61;
➢ Book 113, Page 48, Parcels 01 through 41;
➢ Book 113, Page 49, Parcels 01 through 224; and,
➢ Book 113, Page 50, Parcels 01 through 84.

The Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District is located along the southern boundary of the City, and the properties immediately west, south, and east of these District parcels (excluding any streets or other rights-of-way) are currently outside City boundaries.

Zones of Benefit
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing various landscaping and lighting improvements, including the acquisition, construction, installation, maintenance, and servicing of those improvements and related facilities. In addition, to ensure an appropriate allocation of the estimated costs to provide various improvements based on proportional special benefits, landscaping, and lighting districts often times include benefit zones (“Zones”) as authorized pursuant to Chapter 1 Article 4, Section 22574 of the 1972 Act:
“The diagram and assessment may classify various areas within an assessment district into different zones where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of benefit from the improvements.

A zone shall consist of all territory which will receive substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements.”
While the California Constitution requires that “The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement or the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement…”; it is reasonable to conclude that certain landscaping and/or lighting improvements may benefit the Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

majority of the parcels within a district if not all properties, while other improvements may only provide special benefits to specific parcels, developments or portions of the district (particularly in larger districts). In addition, some improvements within a district and/or the costs associated with various public improvements are identified as providing some measure of general benefit and because these general benefit costs cannot be assessed, the overall cost of those improvements may be proportionately allocated as both special benefit and general benefit.

In accordance with the 1972 Act, it has been determined that it is appropriate and necessary to establish two overall benefit zones (Zones) within this District to be designated as Zone A and Zone B and sub-zones within Zone B (currently Sub-Zones B1, B2, and B3). The boundaries of each Zone and Sub-Zone is established based on the location, extent and types of improvements or similarities in the types of improvements being maintained through the District assessments as well as the particular and distinct benefits the various developments and properties derive from those improvements based on proximity to those specific improvements and the nexus between the development of the properties that required or facilitated the installation of those improvements. While some improvements may be specifically associated with specific development areas or parcels within the District, many improvements may reasonably be considered shared improvements because the overall development of the properties in the area required or necessitated those improvements. In such cases, the special benefits and cost of providing such improvements are proportionately shared by parcels in each Zone.

The net annual cost to provide the improvements for each Zone and/or Sub-Zone are allocated to the benefiting properties within that Zone using a weighted method of apportionment (refer to Assessment Methodology in “Part II — Method of Apportionment”) that calculates the proportional special benefit and assessment for each parcel as compared to other properties that benefit from the District improvements and services. The following is a brief description and summary of the Zones and improvements associated within each Zone. A visual depiction of the location and extent of the improvements and Zone boundaries are provided in the District Diagrams provided in Part V of this Report.

Zone A Parcels and Improvements
Zone A Parcels
Zone A comprises that portion of the parcels within the District located on the south side of Main Street and north of Buena Vista Road. The properties in this Zone are primarily identified as nonresidential properties, but also incorporates a drainage basin and pump station in the northeast corner of the District for which the landscaping will be maintained by the District and proportionately shared by parcels in both Zone A and Zone B. Refer to the “District Diagram – Boundary and Zones, Fiscal Year 2024/2025” in “Part V — District Diagrams” of this Report for a visual depiction of the properties within Zone A. In that same section, the “District Diagram – Development and Improvements, Planned at Buildout” provides a visual depiction of the drainage basin location within Zone A.

Zone A Improvements
The parcels within Zone A will ultimately receive special benefits and will be proportionately assessed in whole or in part for improvements that include, but are not limited to the following:
➢ Shared Improvements (Improvements at buildout that may be proportionately shared by parcels in Zone A and Zone B)
o Street lights on Flower Avenue between Main Street and Buena Vista Road; o Street lights on Buena Vista Road adjacent to both Zone A and Zone B; Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

o Street lights on Obispo Street between Main Street and Buena Vista Road; and, o Landscaping improvements associated with the drainage basin site located at the northeast corner of the District.
➢ Zone Specific Improvements (Improvements at buildout that may be proportionately shared by parcels in Zone A only)
o Street lights on the south side of Main Street adjacent to Zone A.

Zone B Parcels and Improvements
Zone B Parcels
Zone B comprises that portion of the parcels within the District located south of Buena Vista Road.

The properties in this Zone are primarily identified as residential properties (single family residential parcels and planned residential developments), but also includes a future public school site, various park and recreational areas, and various landscape improvements to be maintained by the District. Refer to the “District Diagram – Boundary and Zones, Fiscal Year 2024/2025” in “Part V — District Diagrams” of this Report for a visual depiction of the properties within Zone B.

In that same section, the “District Diagram –Development and Improvements, Planned at Buildout” provides an overall visual depiction of the planned landscaping and lighting improvements throughout the District and Zone B.

Zone B Improvements
The parcels within Zone B will ultimately receive special benefits and will be proportionately assessed in whole or in part for improvements that include, but are not limited to the following:
➢ Shared Improvements (Improvements at buildout that may be proportionately shared by parcels in Zone A and Zone B)
o Street lights on Flower Avenue between Main Street and Buena Vista Road; o Street lights on Buena Vista Road located between Zone A and Zone B; o Street lights on Obispo Street between Main Street and Buena Vista Road; and, o Landscaping improvements associated with the drainage basin site located at the northeast corner of the District.
➢ Zone Specific Improvements (Improvements at buildout that may be proportionately shared by parcels in Zone B only)
o Street lights on Obispo Street between Buena Vista Road and “C” Street, which is the end of Obispo Street (proportionately shared by parcels in Zone B only); o Remaining street lights (The estimated 194 street lights not identified above) within the planned residential developments;
o Landscaping improvements on both sides of Obispo Street between Buena Vista Road and "C" Street;
o Landscaping improvements on both sides of Del Mar Drive between Obispo Street and Fuente Drive;
o Landscaping improvements on the west side of Arroyo Seco Road between Buena Vista Road and Manzanita Street;
o Landscaping improvements on the west side of Arroyo Seco Road between the park site and the end of Arroyo Seco Road (cul-de-sac);
Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

o Landscaping and trail improvements on the east side of Arroyo Seco Road between Buena Vista Road and the end of Arroyo Seco Road (cul-de-sac); o Landscaping improvements on the north side of “B” Street between “C” Street and “F10” Street;
o Landscaping and trail improvements on the south side of “B” Street between “C” Street and “F10” Street;
o Landscaping and trail improvements on the east side of “F10” Street from “B” Street up to the end of the cu-de-sac on “F10” Street;
o Landscaping improvements on the east side of “C” Street between Obispo Street and “B” Street;
o Landscaping and trail improvements on the west side of “C” Street between “B” Street and “D5” Street;
o Paseo (pathway and landscaping) located between the homes on the southwest side of the intersection of “E2” Street and “E3” Street, connecting these streets with the park site near the northeast side of the railroad right-of-way adjacent to the park site; o Landscape buffer/trail on the northeast/east side of the railroad right-of-way extending from Buena Vista Road south to Obispo Street;
o Landscape buffer/trail on the southwest side of the railroad right-of-way between Obispo Street and the designated well-site located at the northern end of “D1” Street and the paseo (pathway and landscaping) connecting “D1” Street with the landscape buffer/trail area;
o Landscape buffer/trail on the southwest side of the railroad right-of-way between Obispo Street and “F10” Street and the paseo (pathway and landscaping) connecting “F1” Street and “F2” Street with the landscape buffer/trail area;
o Habitat Area on the south/southeast side of Obispo Street between the railroad rights-ofway and “A” Street and between “A” Street and “C” Street; o Natural/minimal-maintenance landscaping improvements at the water tank site located north of the cul-de-sac on “D1” Street, between the railroad rights-of-way and the western boundary of the District; and,
o Park/recreational area improvements located within sixteen (16) planned parks and recreational areas located throughout the residential developments within the District boundaries.

Zone B Sub-Zones
Only a portion of the properties within the District have been fully subdivided and/or developed, and only a portion of the improvements have been installed. Therefore, for administrative purposes and to ensure an equitable apportionment of the annual maintenance and operation expenses, the residential development areas within the District identified as Zone B have been established and grouped into Sub-Zones to reflect the current and anticipated development of the properties and the installation of improvements within Zone B. The three (3) Sub-zones which are Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

illustrated on the “District Diagram – Boundary and Zones, Fiscal Year 2024/2025” in “Part V — District Diagrams” of this Report are generally described in the following:
➢ Sub-Zone B1 incorporates the residential developments that have already been subdivided into single family residential lots and are in proximity and associated with local parks, landscaping and/or street lighting improvements that are anticipated to be installed and maintained by the District for fiscal year 2024/2025. Based on available Santa Barbara County Assessor’s data and development within the District, for fiscal year 2024/2025, this Sub-Zone will incorporate four hundred forty-four (444) single family residential parcels and the parks and proposed improvement areas within Tract 29,061, Tract 29,062, and Tract 29,064. These parcels are identified on the Assessor’s Parcel Maps, Book 113, Pages 46, 47, 48, 49, and

50. ➢ Sub-Zone B2 incorporates the planned development area generally located south of Manzanita Street, west of Arroyo Seco Road, east of Obispo Street, and northeast of the railroad right-of-way, which has not been subdivided and identified as part of Zone B1. The properties included in this Sub-Zone are currently identified by the County Assessor’s Office as Vacant property which has not been fully subdivided and/or developed. The parcels within this Sub-Zone are currently identified as Assessor’s Parcel Maps, Book 113, Page 45, Parcels 06 through 08.
➢ Sub-Zone B3 incorporates the planned residential development area within the District located southwest of the railroad right-of-way. The properties included in this Sub-Zone are currently identified by the County Assessor’s Office as Vacant property which has not been fully subdivided or developed. The parcels within this Sub-Zone are currently identified Assessor’s Parcel Maps, Book 113, Page 01, Parcels 25 and 37; and Book 113, Page 08, Parcels 34 through 37.

Application of Sub-Zones in Zone B
By utilizing a Zone and Sub-Zone structure, similar properties with similar types of improvements will be assessed a proportional amount for the total annual expenses related to the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements provided by the District and for which the properties receive special benefits. The use of Sub-Zones allows for each development and the parcels therein to be assessed for the improvements provided as development occurs and/or improvements are installed.

For purposes of establishing the annual assessments for Zone B, the parcels are assigned a proportional benefit and land use designation that reflects the current development of each property and relationship (proximity) to the improvements to be provided and maintained. For the calculation of the fiscal year 2024/2025 annual assessments:
➢ Parcels in Sub-Zone B1 are identified as fully subdivided single family residential parcels (with and without structures) and some parcels identified as Exempt Properties within Tract 29,061, Tract 29,062, and Tract 29,064 for which the District anticipates maintaining all or a portion of the improvements installed in connection with these subdivisions. The parcels that comprise Tract 29,062 and Tract 29,064 were not subdivided when the District was formed and were included in Sub-Zone B2 at that time. In fiscal year 2019/2020 Tract 29,062 became fully subdivided residential lots and the Sub-Zone designation for the associated parcels was changed from B2 to B1. For fiscal year 2022/2023 Tract 29,064 became fully subdivided residential lots and the Sub-Zone designation for the associated parcels changed from B2 to B1.

Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

➢ Parcels in Sub-Zone B2 and Sub-Zone B3 are identified as either Vacant Undeveloped Property, Undeveloped Residential Property, or Exempt Property and assessed in accordance with the method of apportionment described in “Part II — Method of Apportionment” of this Report. However, in future fiscal years as these parcels are subdivided or developed, and/or as additional improvements for Zone B are accepted for maintenance, at the discretion of the Assessment Engineer and/or City Engineer, the land use designation or Sub-Zone designation for the affected properties may be reclassified.

Description of the District Improvements
As authorized by the 1972 Act, the improvements to be provided by the District and associated with each Zone therein incorporate local street lighting, parks, and various landscaping improvements that are to be maintained and serviced for the benefit of real property within the District. The various improvements to be maintained by the District have been or will be installed in direct connection with the development of properties for the benefit of those properties and are considered necessary for the development of those properties to their full and best use. The work to be performed within the District may include, but is not limited to (as applicable), the personnel; materials; equipment; electricity; water; contract services; repair and rehabilitation of the improvements; and incidental expenses required to operate the District and provide the improvements and services. The annual assessments to be levied on properties within the District provide a source of funding to support the continued operation and maintenance of these improvements that provide a particular and distinct benefit (special benefit) to those properties.

Each parcel shall be assessed proportionately for only those improvements, services, and expenses for which the parcel receives a special benefit. The improvement plans and specifications for the District are on file in the Office of Public Works of the City of Guadalupe and by reference these plans and specifications are made part of this Report. The District improvements anticipated to be installed and constructed at build-out generally include but are not limited to:

Proposed Improvements at Build-out
Landscape Improvements
The landscape improvements to be funded by the District assessments may include, but are not limited to, turf, ground cover, shrubs and plants; areas of natural vegetation; trees; irrigation and drainage systems; masonry walls, retaining walls, or other fencing; monuments; hardscapes; concrete or decomposed granite trail/pathways; and other related appurtenant facilities within the District that will be dedicated to the City for maintenance or which the City has an easement to maintain such improvements including but are not limited to:
➢ Designated parkway side-panels adjacent to the streets and properties within the District, including parkways, entryways, and trails;
➢ Various non-street landscaping and/or vegetation management areas including a drainage basin, dedicated Habitat/Open Space areas, a water tank site, and buffer/greenbelt/trail areas along the railroad right-of way; and
➢ The planned local park sites and/or recreational areas within the District.

The following provides a summary description of the landscape improvements anticipated to be constructed as part of the development of properties within the District and ultimately maintained through the District at build-out. For reference purposes, in conjunction with these descriptions of the improvements a visual depiction of the landscape improvement areas is provided on the Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

diagrams contained in Part V of this Report. At build-out, it is anticipated that the District’s landscape improvements will generally include, but is not limited to approximately:
➢ Obispo Street
o 41,785 square feet of irrigated landscape improvements, located on both sides of Obispo Street between Buena Vista Road and the railroad rights-of-way. o 20,465 square feet of irrigated landscape improvements, located on both sides of Obispo Street between the railroad rights-of-way and “C” Street. ➢ Del Mar Drive
o 5,190 square feet of irrigated landscape improvements, located on both sides of Del Mar Drive between Obispo Street and Fuente Drive.
➢ Arroyo Seco Road
o 68,660 square feet of maintained improvements, located on the east side of Arroyo Seco Road between Buena Vista Road and the end of Arroyo Seco Road (cul-de-sac). These maintained improvements incorporate 45,700 square feet of irrigated landscaping and 22,960 square feet of trail/pathway improvements.
o 4,720 square feet of irrigated landscape improvements, located on the west side of Arroyo Seco Road between Buena Vista Road and Manzanita Street. o 3,195 square feet of irrigated landscape improvements, located on the west side of Arroyo Seco Road between the southern end of the park site (just north of “E1” Street) and the end of Arroyo Seco Road (cul-de-sac).
➢ “B” Street
o 33,625 square feet of irrigated landscape improvements, located on the north side of “B” Street between “C” Street and “F10” Street.
o 60,495 square feet of maintained improvements, located on the south side of “B” Street between “C” Street and “F10” Street. These maintained improvements incorporate 40,345 square feet of irrigated landscaping and 20,150 square feet of trail/pathway improvements. ➢ “F10” Street
o 6,815 square feet of maintained improvements, located on the east side of “F10” Street from “B” Street up to the end of the cu-de-sac on “F10” Street. These maintained improvements incorporate 4,830 square feet of irrigated landscaping and 1,985 square feet of trail/pathway improvements.
➢ “C” Street
o 8,045 square feet of irrigated landscape improvements, located on the east side of “C” Street between Obispo Street and “B” Street.
o 33,350 square feet of maintained improvements, located on the west side of “C” Street between “B” Street and “D5” Street. These maintained improvements incorporate 24,930 square feet of irrigated landscaping and 8,420 square feet of trail/pathway improvements. ➢ Non-Streetscape Areas
o 2,275 square feet of non-streetscape trail/pathway improvements, located between the homes on the southwest side of the intersection of “E2” Street and “E3” Street, connecting these streets with the park site near the northeast side of the railroad right-of-way adjacent to the park.

Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

o 22,850 square feet of improvement area (landscape buffer/trail), located on the northeast/east side of the railroad right-of-way behind the homes on the west and southwest side of Las Flores Drive extending from Buena Vista Road south to Obispo Street. It is anticipated that much of this improvement area will be irrigated landscaping, but all or a portion of the area may ultimately be installed with minimal/modified irrigation or no irrigation.
o 15,775 square feet of improvement area (landscape buffer/trail), located on the southwest side of the railroad right-of-way behind the homes on the northeast side of “D1” Street between Obispo Street and the designated well-site located at the northern end of “D1” Street. This square footage includes the estimated 2,145 square feet of paseo (pathway) connecting “D1” Street with the landscape buffer/trail area. It is anticipated that much of this improvement area will be irrigated landscaping, but all or a portion of the area may ultimately be installed with minimal/modified irrigation or no irrigation. o 39,435 square feet of improvement area (landscape buffer/trail), located on the southwest side of the railroad right-of-way behind the homes on the northeast side of “F1” Street and at the cul-de-sacs of “F9” Street and “F10” Street, between Obispo Street and “F10” Street.

This square footage includes the estimated 2,205 square feet of paseo (pathway) connecting “F1” Street and “F2” Street with this landscape buffer/trail area. It is anticipated that much of this improvement area will be irrigated landscaping, but all or a portion of the area may ultimately be installed with minimal/modified irrigation or no irrigation. o 280,770 square feet of natural/minimal maintenance landscape improvements (Habitat Area), located on the south/southeast side of Obispo Street between the railroad rightsof-way and “A” Street and between “A” Street and “C” Street. o 37,245 square feet of natural/minimal maintenance landscape improvements (open space water tank site), located north of the cul-de-sac on “D1” Street, between the railroad rightsof-way and the western boundary of the District. o 67,385 square feet of maintained improvements (open space drainage basin site), located at the northeast corner of the Zone, east of Flower Avenue between Main Street and Buena Vista Road. These maintained improvements incorporate 30,840 square feet of irrigated landscaping and 36,545 square feet of non-irrigated natural/minimalmaintenance landscaped area. ➢ Parks
o 660,895 square feet of park and recreational area improvements, located within sixteen (16) planned park sites, paseos, or recreational areas located throughout the residential development area within the District boundaries. While it is anticipated that much of this improvement area will be irrigated landscaping (mostly turf), this overall square footage also incorporates the non-landscaped areas within the parks including play areas, sports courts, sidewalks, and other hardscape areas, but does not include any parking areas associated with these park/recreational areas.

Park Facilities
In addition to the landscape improvements within the park/recreational areas, the improvements and facilities to be funded may include, but are not limited to maintenance and servicing of the sports courts and fields; playground equipment and structures; sidewalks; ornamental or safety lighting; benches; trash receptacles; drinking fountains; picnic facilities; and any other equipment, structures or facilities related to the foregoing.

Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Lighting Improvements
Lighting improvements to be funded by the District assessments may include, but are not limited to, electrical energy, lighting fixtures, poles, meters, conduits, electrical cable, and appurtenant facilities associated with the street lights, traffic signals, and lighting within public areas within the District. Maintenance, operation, and servicing of these lighting improvements may include, but is not limited to the furnishing of electric current or other illuminating agent as needed; the maintenance, repair, and replacement of worn out electrical components and light fixtures, including bulbs, ballasts, photoelectric cells, meters, and electrical cables; repair or replacement of damaged poles, ground wires, and conduits caused by accidents, vandalism, time, and weather; and monitoring of the Underground Service Alert (USA) network to prevent damage by excavation. At build-out, it is anticipated that the District’s lighting improvements will generally include, but is not limited to:
➢ Thirteen (13) street lights located on the south side of Main Street adjacent to the proposed non-residential development area within the District;
➢ Two (2) street lights on Flower Avenue between Main Street and Buena Vista Road; ➢ Fourteen (14) street lights on the north side of Buena Vista Road which is between the proposed residential developments and the proposed non-residential development area; ➢ Twenty (20) street lights on Obispo Street;
o Five (5) street lights located between Main Street and Buena Vista Road; o Ten (10) street lights located between Buena Vista Road and the railroad right-of-way; o Five (5) street lights located between the railroad right-of-way and “C” Street; ➢ One hundred ninety-four (194) street lights within the planned residential developments; ➢ The safety/security lights, recreational lights (fields and courts) and/or ornamental lighting associated with the park/recreational areas; and
➢ Any other public lighting facilities including future traffic signals that may be deemed necessary or desired for the safe ingress or egress to the properties within the District.

Excluded Improvements
Improvements that are not a part of the District improvements include privately owned street lights and landscaping improvements located on private property and/or areas designated as Homeowner Association or Business Association properties or easements. Such improvements and facilities including street trees shall be provided and maintained by the individual property owners, property management group or association established in connection with the development of properties within the District.

Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Fiscal Year 2024/2025 Improvements
The following improvements are currently maintained or installed by the developer and may be accepted by the City for maintenance during fiscal year 2024/2025 and may be funded in whole or in part by the annual assessments:

Improvements Allocated to All Benefiting Properties
The following improvements provide special benefits and are proportionately shared and allocated to all properties within the District:
➢ Five (5) street lights on Obispo Street between Main Street and Buena Vista Road.

Improvements Allocated to All Properties in Zone B Only The following improvements provide special benefits and are proportionately shared and allocated to all properties within Zone B (Sub-Zones B1, B2, and B3):
➢ Approximately 36,335 square feet of irrigated landscape improvements, located on both sides of Obispo Street between Buena Vista Road and Manzanita Street. This is approximately 75% of the 41,785 square feet of planned irrigated landscape improvements located on both sides of Obispo Street between Buena Vista Road and the railroad rights-of-way; and, ➢ Six (6) street lights on Obispo Street between Buena Vista Road and Manzanita Street.

Improvements Allocated to Properties in Zone A and Sub-Zone B1 The following improvements provide special benefits and are proportionately shared and allocated to the properties within Zone A as well as those properties within Sub-Zone B1:
➢ Fourteen (14) street lights on Buena Vista Road which are situated between the residential developments of Zone B1 and the planned non-residential development properties in Zone A. o Five (5) street lights on Buena Vista Road, west of Obispo Street (between Obispo Street and Las Flores Drive); and,
o Nine (9) street lights on Buena Vista Road, east of Obispo Street (between Obispo Street and Arroyo Seco Road).

Improvements Allocated to Properties in Sub-Zone B1 and Sub-Zone B2 The following improvements provide special benefits and are proportionately shared and allocated to the properties within Sub-Zone B1 as well as those properties within Sub-Zone B2:
➢ Approximately 20,600 square feet of landscaping improvements located on the east side of Arroyo Seco Road between Buena Vista Road and Manzanita Street (13,710 square feet of irrigated landscaping and 6,890 square feet of trail/pathway improvements) is currently being maintained. An additional 41,195 square feet of landscaping improvements on the east side of Arroyo Seco Road between Manzanita Street and Guerrero Drive (27,420 square feet of irrigated landscaping and 13,775 square feet of trail/pathway improvements) has been installed and may be accepted for maintenance by the end of the fiscal year. Collectively, these 61,795 square feet of improvements represent approximately 90% of the 68,660 square feet of planned improvements for the east side of Arroyo Seco Road between Buena Vista Road and the end of Arroyo Seco Road at the railroad right-of-way. ➢ Twelve (12) street lights that are adjacent to and benefit both properties in Sub-Zone B1 (Tracts 29,062 and 29,064) and Sub-Zone B2 parcels (school and community park sites):
o Six (6) street lights located on Manzanita Street between Obispo Street and Arroyo Seco Road, adjacent to Tract 29,062 (Sub-Zone B1) and the future school site (Sub-Zone B2).

Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

o Six (6) street lights on Arroyo Seco Road between Buena Vista Road and Manzanita Street adjacent to Tract 29,062. These six (6) streets lights are a portion of the eighteen (18) total planned street lights on Arroyo Seco.

Improvements Allocated to Properties in Sub-Zone B1 Only The following improvements provide special benefits and are proportionately shared and allocated to all the residential properties within Zone B1 only:
➢ Approximately 5,190 square feet of irrigated landscape improvements, located on both sides of Del Mar Drive between Obispo Street and Fuente Drive (entryway to Tract 29,061). ➢ Approximately 4,720 square feet of irrigated landscaping improvements, located on the west side of Arroyo Seco Road between Buena Vista Road and Manzanita Street. ➢ Approximately 46,905 square feet of park and recreational area improvements, located within the two (2) neighborhood park sites and recreational areas located within Tract 29,061. The majority of the site improvements incorporate irrigated landscaping (mostly turf), but this overall square footage also includes some non-landscaped areas including play areas, sports courts, sidewalks, and other hardscape areas.
➢ Approximately 53,145 square feet of park and recreational area improvements, located within the seven (7) neighborhood park sites or recreational areas located within Tract 29,062. The majority of the site improvements incorporate irrigated landscaping (mostly turf), but this overall square footage also includes some non-landscaped areas including play areas, sports courts, sidewalks, and other hardscape areas.
➢ Approximately 23,085 square feet of park and recreational area improvements, located within the neighborhood park sites, basins, and/or recreational areas located within Tract 29,064.

The majority of the site improvements incorporate irrigated landscaping (mostly turf), but this overall square footage also includes some non-landscaped areas including play areas, sports courts, sidewalks, and other hardscape areas.
➢ Sixty-five (65) street lights within Sub- Zone B1 residential development areas, including:
o Twenty-five (25) street lights within Tract 29,061, located on Fuente Drives, Castillo Drive, Las Flores Drive, Del Mar Drive, Esperanza Drive, and Gusto Court. o Forty (40) street lights within Tract 29,062 including lights located on Ninos Drive, Hacienda Drive, La Joya Drive, Jalama Drive, Ladera Drive, and Lazo Drive.

Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Part II — Method of Apportionment
Legislative Authority and Provisions
1972 Act
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, including the acquisition, construction, installation and servicing of landscaping and lighting improvements and related facilities. The 1972 Act requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value:

Section 22573 defines the net amount to be assessed as follows:
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
Section 22574 provides for zones as follows:
“The diagram and assessment may classify various areas within an assessment district into different zones where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of benefit from the improvements.

A zone shall consist of all territory which will receive substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements.”
The formulas used for calculating assessments and the designation of Zones and Sub-Zones as established herein reflect the composition of parcels within the District and the improvements and activities to be provided, and have been designed to fairly apportion the cost of providing those improvements based on a determination of the proportional special benefits to each parcel, consistent with the requirements of the 1972 Act and the provisions of Article XIII D of the California Constitution (Proposition 218).

California Constitution
The costs to operate and maintain the District improvements are identified and allocated to properties within each Zone and/or Sub-Zone within the District based on special benefit. The improvements provided and for which properties are to be assessed are identified as local landscaping and lighting improvements and related amenities that were installed in connection with the development of the properties and/or would otherwise be required for the development of properties within each respective Zone and/or Sub-Zone. The District assessments and method of apportionment are based on the premise that these improvements would otherwise not have been required without the development or planned development of those parcels.

Article XIII D Section 2d defines District as follows:
“District means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or property-related service,” Article XIII D Section 2i defines Special Benefit as follows:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit.”
Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Article XIII D Section 4a defines Proportional Special Benefit Assessments as follows:
“An agency which proposes to levy an assessment shall identify all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed. The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the property related service being provided. No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.” Benefit Analysis
The improvements provided by this District and for which properties will be assessed have been identified as necessary, desired and/or required for the orderly development of the properties within the District to their full potential, consistent with the development plans and applicable portions of the City’s General Plan.

Special Benefits
The ongoing maintenance of landscaped areas within the District will provide aesthetic benefits to the properties within the District and each respective Zone and/or Sub-Zone therein and are intended to provide a more pleasant environment to walk, drive, live, and work. The primary function of these improvements and related amenities is to serve as an aesthetically pleasing enhancement and green space for the benefit of the immediately surrounding properties and developments for which the improvements are constructed and installed and/or are facilitated by the development or potential development of properties within the District. These improvements are an integral part of the physical environment associated with the parcels in the District and while some of these improvements may in part be visible to properties outside the District and/or the respective Zones and Sub-Zones, collectively if these improvements are not properly maintained, it is the parcels within the District and/or the respective Zones and Sub-Zones that would be aesthetically burdened. Additionally, many of the landscape improvements include parks, green spaces, and trails that provide visually pleasing open space areas that serve as an extension of the physical attributes of the parcels assessed, such as their front or rear yards and may also provide a greater opportunity for recreation as well as serving as a physical buffer and/or sound reduction buffer between the roadways and the properties in the District. Thus, the maintenance of these landscape improvements provides particular and distinct benefits to the properties and developments associated with those improvements.

Likewise, street lighting in the District is primarily useful for illuminating the streets that provide access to the properties in the District as well as the sidewalks and parking lanes associated with those properties. While it is recognized that street lights and traffic signals serve in part to enhance traffic safety, installation and construction of these improvements are for the most part, required by the development of properties within the district and these improvements provide three main special benefits to those properties: (i) property security benefit, (ii) pedestrian safety benefit, and (iii) parkway/roadway access benefit. Furthermore, because traffic circulation in the City is largely the result of local traffic to and from these properties by the property owners and guests, it is reasonable to assume that these properties derive a particular and distinct benefit from the street lighting that support the safe access to the properties and essentially all pedestrians and parking vehicles in the lit areas will, after dark, be directly associated with the assessed properties. As a result, the maintenance of these lighting improvements is a particular and distinct benefit to the properties and developments within the District and the Zones and Sub-Zones therein.

Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Collectively these landscaping and lighting improvements and related assessments enhance the security, overall use, presentation, and marketability of the properties, and ensure the long-term cost-efficiency of services that is obtained through the City provided maintenance (economy of scale), and the regulatory restrictions on future cost increases.

General Benefit
Landscaping General Benefit
In reviewing the location and extent of the specific landscaped areas and improvements to be funded by District assessments and the proximity and relationship to properties to be assessed, it is evident these improvements have been or will be installed as part of the development of properties within the District or are improvements that would otherwise be shared by and required for development of those properties. Although the District improvements are located on public streets or public areas that are typically visible and/or accessible to the general public, it is evident that the ongoing maintenance of these improvements are only necessary for the appearance and advantage of the properties within the District that are directly associated with those improvements and these improvements (particularly the level of maintenance and servicing) are not required nor necessarily desired by any properties outside the District and/or the respective Zones and/or Sub-Zones associated with those various improvements. It is also evident that the maintenance these improvements and the level of maintenance provided has a direct and particular impact (special benefit) only on those properties in proximity to those improvements and such maintenance beyond that which is required to ensure the safety and protection of the general public and property in general, has limited (if any) indirect or incidental benefit to the public at large or properties outside each respective Zone.

In the absence of a special funding Zone, the City’s maintenance of these improvements would for the most part, be limited to tree management, weed abatement, rodent control, and erosion control services for the various landscape areas. This basic or baseline level of service would typically provide for periodic servicing of these areas on an as-needed basis. This baseline level of service would provide for public safety and essential property protection to avoid negative impacts on adjacent roadways and vehicles traveling on those roadways and potential property damage, but results in a far less visually pleasing environment than is created with the enhanced levels of services associated with the regular landscape maintenance that can be provided through the District assessments.

On average, the cost to provide this baseline level of service for the District’s planned landscape areas is estimated to be approximately $0.012626 per square foot (approximately $550 per acre) which includes a five percent (5%) cost factor for City overhead and administration. This baseline service cost per square foot represents approximately five percent (5%) of the overall cost per square foot for the annual operation and maintenance of the landscape areas.

Other Landscaping General Benefits
In addition to the general benefit identified above, it is recognized that there are indirect or incidental general benefits to properties within the District as well as the general public that are associated with regular landscape maintenance services, including:
➢ Minimization of dust and debris; and
➢ Decreased potential water runoff from both properties and the landscaped areas.

Although these types of benefits might best be characterized as indirect consequences of the special benefit of the landscape maintenance provided to parcels served by the District, for the Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

purposes of calculating proportional benefits, we assume these types of benefits to be general benefits, albeit general benefits that are extremely difficult to quantify. We estimate that the costs associated with these indirect benefits do not exceed one percent (1%) of the annual maintenance expenditure for the landscaping improvements.

The baseline general benefit costs and the indirect/incidental general benefit costs identified above shall be excluded from the special benefit assessment funding and not assessed to the parcels within the District. The total calculated general benefit cost for the landscaping improvements associated with each Zone and/or Sub-Zone is summarized in the table at the end of this section and is also identified in the budgets contained in Part III of this Report.

Lighting General Benefit
In reviewing the location and extent of the specific lighting improvements to be funded by District assessments and the proximity and relationship to properties to be assessed, like the landscaping improvements it is evident these improvements are being installed as a direct result of the development of the properties within the District or are lighting improvements that would otherwise be shared by and required for the development of those properties. It is also evident that the maintenance and servicing of these improvements has a direct and particular impact (special benefit) on those properties in proximity to those street lighting improvements and these street lighting improvements are for the most part, lighting improvements that exceed what would otherwise be required for traffic circulation or to ensure the safety and protection of the general public and property in general.

Because these District lighting improvements are directly associated with the development or anticipated development of the properties within each respective District Zone and clearly provide a special benefit to those properties that is not shared by all properties in the City, it is certainly reasonable to conclude that the maintenance and operation of these improvements is largely, if not entirely, a special benefit to those properties to be assessed. Based on the special benefits previously identified for street lights, it is apparent that within residential developments (Zone B, which is comprised initially as Sub-Zones B1, B2, and B3), the internal residential development street lights are installed solely for the use and benefit of those residential properties and there is no quantifiable general benefit to other properties or to the public at large.

In addition to the internal residential street lights within the various developments in Zone B, the properties in Zone B (both the residential parcels and the school site) are accessed from and/or are adjacent to Obispo Street and/or Flower Avenue and Buena Vista Road and the street lights on these secondary/collector streets are collectively and proportionately shared by the properties in Zone B as well as the non-residential properties in Zone A which are adjacent to these streets and associated street lights. Collectively, these secondary/collector street lights represent approximately fifteen percent (15%) of the total street lights to be installed within the District. While these secondary/collector lights are clearly the result of the development of properties within the District, it is also reasonable to conclude that these types of streets are often accessed by the general public (possibly in route to the school or parks) and to some extent the street lighting on these streets may also enhance general nighttime traffic safety and circulation for other properties and the public at large. Based on various traffic circulation studies and related data, it is estimated that less than forty percent (40%) of these secondary/collector street lights would be required for similar streets in less concentrated development areas. Therefore, it has been determined that the general benefit related to the overall operation and maintenance of these shared street lights is no more than six percent (6%) of the street light operating costs for these particular street lights.

However, to ensure that no parcel is assessed for more than its proportional special benefit for these shared street lights, the City will contribute for general benefit an amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the budgeted regular annual maintenance expenditures (maintenance and Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

energy costs). These general benefit costs shall be excluded from the special benefit assessment funding and not assessed to the parcels within the District.

In addition to the internal residential street lights and secondary/collector street lights discussed above, the non-residential properties within Zone A will directly benefit from the street lights to be installed on Main Street (a primary/arterial street) adjacent to those properties. Similar to the lights on secondary/collector streets, it is certainly reasonable to recognize that the street lights on this primary/arterial street provides a measure of general benefit to the public and to properties in general resulting from nighttime traffic safety and circulation. The American National Standard Practice for Roadway Lighting and various related traffic and street lighting studies suggest that over ninety percent (90%) of the street lights installed on primary/arterial streets in urban areas are directly the result of property development (both residential and non-residential development).

In turn these developments increase traffic circulation and ultimately dictate the type of lighting, spacing and number of lights required and without such development, both the need and quantity of those lights would be dramatically reduced, which is reflected by the limited lighting that currently exists in this area on Main Street. Therefore, like the secondary/collector street lights associated with this District, it has been determined that the general benefit related to the operation and maintenance of the street lights on Main Street is ten percent (10%) of the regular annual maintenance expenditures (maintenance and energy costs). These general benefit costs shall be excluded from the special benefit assessment funding and not assessed to the parcels within Zone A of the District.

Utilizing the general benefit service costs outlined above and the improvements proposed at buildout, the following table summarizes the estimated general benefit costs calculated for each Zone and Sub-Zone within District:

Estimated General Benefit for Street Lighting, Landscaping, and Parks (1) As with most maintenance costs, the General Benefit Costs shown above have been adjusted for inflation and in subsequent fiscal years the General Benefit Cost will likely continue to be impacted and adjusted for inflation.

Zone A ($24) $0 ($24)
Sub-Zone B1 ($972) ($5,696) ($6,668)
Sub-Zone B2 ($7) ($28) ($35)
Sub-Zone B3 ($14) ($70) ($84)
Zone B Zone B Total ($992) ($5,795) ($6,786)
Total General Benefit ($1,015) ($5,795) ($6,810)
Zone Street Lighting
Landscaping
and Parks Total (1)
General Benefit General Benefit General Benefit
Sub-Zone
Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Assessment Methodology
To calculate and identify the proportional special benefit received by each parcel and ultimately each parcel’s proportionate share of the improvement costs it is necessary to consider not only the improvements and services to be provided, but the relationship each parcel has to those improvements as compared to other parcels in the District.

Article XIII D Section 4a reads in part:
“…The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement or the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement or for the cost of the property related service being provided. No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.” Landscaping and lighting improvements like most public improvements, provide varying degrees of benefit (whether they be general or special) based largely on the extent of such improvements, and the location of the improvements in relationship to properties associated with those improvements. To establish the proportional special benefit and ultimately the assessment obligation for each parcel, these factors need to be addressed and formulated in the method of apportionment by the use of benefit zones that reflect the extent and location of the improvements in relationship to the properties, as well as the specific use of the property and characteristics that reflects each parcel’s proportional special benefit as compared to other properties that benefit from those same improvements.

The method of apportionment (method of assessment) developed for this District is based on the premise that each property to be assessed receives a particular and distinct benefit (special benefit) from the improvements, services and facilities to be financed by the District assessments and to assess benefits equitably it is necessary to calculate each property’s relative share of the special benefits conferred by the funded improvements and service. The Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) method of assessment apportionment is utilized in this District and establishes a basic unit of benefit (base value) and then calculates the benefit derived by each assessed parcel as a multiple (or a fraction) of that basic unit. This EBU method of apportioning special benefits is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for districts formed under the 1972 Act, as the benefit to each parcel from the improvements are apportioned as a function of comparable property characteristics The base value and assessment formula utilized in each Zone may be different, but is established for each Zone to reflect the improvements and properties that benefit from those improvements utilizing property characteristics that may include but is not limited to the type of development (property land use), property’s development status, and size of the property (acreage or units).

For the purposes of this Engineer’s Report, an EBU is the quantum of benefit derived from the various Zone improvements by a single family residential parcel. The single family residential parcel has been selected as the basic value for calculation of assessments since at build-out this land use will represent over ninety-eight percent (98%) of the parcels in the District and over seventy percent (70%) of the total acreage developed. Thus, the “benchmark” property (the single family residential parcel) derives one (1) EBU of benefit and is assigned 1.00 Equivalent Benefit Unit.

The following outlines the land use classifications that are associated with or may be associated with the parcels in the District and the proportional Equivalent Benefit Units established for those land use classifications.

Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Land Use Classifications
Single-Family Residential – This land use classification is defined as a fully subdivided residential home site with or without a structure. This land use may include, but is not limited to subdivided residential tract lots, condominiums, or other individual residential units or subdivided lots assigned an Assessor’s Parcel Number. As previously noted, the single family residential parcel has been selected as the basic value for calculation of assessments and each is assigned

1.00 Equivalent Benefit Unit.

Multi-Family Residential – This land use classification is defined as properties that are primarily used for residential purposes, but contain more than a single residential unit on the parcel (parcels with more than one dwelling) including apartments, duplexes, or other multi-unit structures. Due in part to the development and population densities associated with these types of dwelling units (reduced unit size compared to the typical density and size of single-family properties), studies have consistently shown that the average apartment unit impacts infrastructure approximately eighty percent (80%) as much as a single-family residence. (Sources: Institute of Transportation Engineers Informational Report Trip Generation, Fifth Edition, 1991; Metcalf and Eddy, Wastewater Engineering Treatment, Disposal, Reuse, Third Edition, 1991.) Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that the proportional special benefit these properties receive from the public improvements funded by the District assessments has a similar proportionality and these parcels shall be assigned a weighted proportional special benefit of 0.80 EBU per unit.

Developed Non-Residential – This land use is defined as a parcel and/or development (group of parcels) that has been developed primarily with a non-residential use including, but not limited to (both publicly owned and privately owned) commercial retail or service, office or professional service, hotel or motel, manufacturing, warehousing, parking lot, and/or institutional facilities including hospitals or other medical facilities, private schools or education centers, churches or other non-profit organizations. Based on the planned residential development within this District, it has been determined that these planned single-family residential developments will yield approximately five (5) dwelling units per acre of land. The actual residential development density is 5.43 units per acre. Therefore, since the single family residential parcel (the base value for calculation of assessments) is assigned 1.0 Equivalent Benefit Unit it is reasonable and appropriate to assign the developed non-residential properties a weighted special benefit that reflects a similar and proportional development density. Therefore, the EBU assigned to each developed non-residential property is established by multiplying the parcel’s applied acreage by

5.0 EBU per acre (e.g., a developed non-residential parcel of 4.25 acres would be assigned 21.25 EBU, 4.25 acres x 5.0 EBU/acre = 21.25 EBU).

Public School Property – This classification includes the parcel currently identified specifically as a public school site. On average, approximately 1/3rd (33.33%) of the total school site acreage is developed with structures and parking facilities, which is similar to what is commonly associated with non-residential developments. The remaining parcel acreage (approximately 66.67%) is generally playground areas and/or sports fields which is similar to the District’s park improvements. Recognizing the overall development of this parcel as compared to other properties in the District and the improvements in proximity to this property, it has been determined that the proportional special benefit EBU calculated for this parcel is accurately reflected by treating that portion of the parcel with structures and parking facilities (1/3rd of the parcel’s acreage) similar to the EBU calculated for Developed Non-Residential properties (33.33% of acreage x 5.0 EBU/acre), with the remaining 2/3rd of the parcel’s acreage being excluded (treated similar to the District’s park facility, although this area is not part of the improvements being maintained by the District). Therefore, this 14.37 acre school site parcel shall be assigned 11.98 EBU for balloting purposes to establish the property’s maximum assessment Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

and proportional special benefit ([14.37 acres x 33.33% = 4.79 applied acre]; x 5.00 EBU/acre =

11.98 EBU).

However, for calculation of the annual assessments each fiscal year, the Assessment Engineer shall apply to this parcel an EBU that best reflects the property’s development status and proportional special benefit from the exiting improvements and/or new improvements to be installed and accepted during the fiscal year. The Assessment Engineer may treat the parcel as a Vacant Undeveloped Property (assigned 1.00 EBU per acre or 4.79 EBU) or any proportional EBU up to the parcel’s maximum EBU described above (11.98 EBU).

Based on the current development of this property and the location and timing of the improvements to be accepted by the City for maintenance, this parcel shall be assigned a weighted special benefit per applied acre applicable to Vacant Undeveloped Property.

Planned Residential Development – This land use classification is defined as a parcel or group of parcels that may currently be identified as vacant undeveloped property or undeveloped residential property, zoned for residential use, and the number of residential units to be developed on the property has been determined or identified as part of a Tentative Development Plan, Tentative Tract Map or Specific Plan.

For balloting purposes to establish each property’s maximum assessment and proportional special benefit, these parcels were assigned an EBU that reflected the total EBU’s planned for that parcel at build-out (1.00 EBU per single-family residential lot and 0.80 per multi-family residential unit).

However, for calculation of the annual assessments each fiscal year, the Assessment Engineer shall apply to such parcels an EBU that best reflects that parcel’s proportional special benefit from the improvements and services provided as compared to other properties in the District, Zone and Sub-Zone based on the type and location of the improvements to be maintained, the proximity of the property to those improvements, and the development status of the property. Because these factors can vary from year to year and from parcel to parcel, the calculated EBU for each parcel originally balloted as a Planned Residential Development parcel may be different utilizing either the acreage of the parcel or number of planned units. The Assessment Engineer may identify the parcel and treat the parcel as a Vacant Undeveloped Property (assigned 1.00 EBU per applied acre up to a maximum of 5.0 EBU); as an Undeveloped Residential Property (assigned 1.00 EBU per acre for the parcel’s total acreage); or may temporarily identify the parcels as a Special Case Parcel (refer to this land use classification below) assigning the parcel any proportional EBU up to the maximum EBU for which the property was ballot (1.0 EBU per singlefamily residential lot and 0.80 per multi-family residential unit).

Based on the development of properties within the District (specifically in Zone B) and the location and timing of the improvements to be accepted by the City for maintenance, the parcels initially identified as Planned Residential Development properties have each be assigned a weighted special benefit per acre applicable to either Vacant Undeveloped Property or Undeveloped Residential Property.

Planned Non-Residential Development – This land use classification is defined as a parcel or group of parcels that may currently be identified as vacant undeveloped property or undeveloped non-residential property, zoned for a non-residential use including proposed commercial retail or service, office or professional service, hotel or motel, manufacturing, warehousing, parking lot, and/or institutional facilities including hospitals or other medical facilities, private schools or education centers, churches or other non-profit organizations based on a Tentative Development Plan, Tentative Tract Map or Specific Plan.

Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

For balloting purposes to establish each property’s maximum assessment and proportional special benefit, these parcels were assigned an EBU that reflected the total EBU’s planned for that parcel at build-out (5.00 EBU per applied acre as applicable to Developed Non-Residential properties).

However, for calculation of the annual assessments each fiscal year, the Assessment Engineer shall apply to such parcels an EBU that best reflects that parcel’s proportional special benefit from the improvements and services provided as compared to other properties in the District and Zone based on the type and location of the improvements to be maintained, the proximity of the property to those improvements, and the development status of the property. Because these factors can vary from year to year and from parcel to parcel, the calculated EBU for each parcel originally balloted as Planned Non-Residential Development may be different. The Assessment Engineer may identify the parcel and treat the parcel as a Vacant Undeveloped Property (assigned 1.00 EBU per applied acre up to a maximum of 5.0 EBU); as an Undeveloped Non-Residential Property (assigned 1.00 EBU per acre for the parcel’s total acreage); or may temporarily identify the parcel as a Special Case Parcel (refer to this land use classification below) assigning the parcel any proportional EBU up to the maximum EBU for which the property was ballot (5.00 EBU per applied acre as applicable to Developed Non-Residential properties).

Based on the anticipated development of properties within the District (specifically in Zone A) and the location and timing of the improvements to be accepted by the City for maintenance, the parcels initially identified as Planned Non-Residential Development properties have each been assigned a weighted special benefit per acre applicable to either Vacant Undeveloped Property or Undeveloped Non-Residential Property.

Vacant Undeveloped Property – This land use classification includes undeveloped properties that are identified as parcels with no development including residential and non-residential properties, undeveloped school sites, and parcels that may currently be used for agricultural purposes. Although it is recognized that most of the improvements within the various Zones and Sub-Zones of the District will be constructed and accepted for maintenance in large part as properties are developed and these developments will clearly receive a particular and distinct benefit (direct special benefit) from those improvements, it is also recognized that most of the various improvements proposed within the District are considered shared improvements that collectively support the overall development of properties within the District and Zones to their full and best use, including the vacant undeveloped properties. However, it is also recognized that the planned parks, internal (neighborhood) street lights and some of the non-streetscape improvements within the District are in large part specifically related to the residential parcels that have an immediate utilization of these improvements and the special benefit costs associated with the parks, neighborhood street lights and landscape areas should be assessed primarily if not entirely to the properties which are developed or actively being developed. Likewise, most of the remaining landscaping and lighting improvements within the District will likely be installed and accepted for maintenance as properties are developed and those developing parcels clearly receive a proportionately greater benefit from those improvements than do the undeveloped properties. Therefore, it has been determined that parcels identified as Vacant Undeveloped Property shall be assigned a proportional EBU that is twenty percent (20%) of that assigned to developed properties, which is 1.0 EBU per applied acre (20% of the 5.0 EBU per acre assigned to Developed Non-Residential properties), up to a maximum of five (5.0) acres per parcel or 5.0 EBU per parcel. (e.g., a Vacant Undeveloped Property which is 7.00-acres would be assigned

5.00 EBU [5.0-acre maximum x 1.0 EBU/acre]).

Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Undeveloped Residential Property – This land use classification includes undeveloped properties that were originally identified as Planned Residential Development parcels, but have not yet been developed or subdivided, but are either adjacent to or in close proximity to improvements that will be maintained for the current fiscal year, and/or the property is actively being developed. While many of the improvements within the District will be constructed and accepted for maintenance in large part as properties are being subdivided or developed and those properties will clearly receive a particular and distinct benefit (direct special benefits) from those improvements, it is also recognized that certain improvements within the District are installed in advance of property development that are considered shared improvements that collectively support the overall development of properties within the District and Zones to their full and best use, including the vacant undeveloped properties. However, it is also recognized that some of these shared improvements within the District have a more direct and particular benefit to those undeveloped properties directly adjacent to the improvements or in close proximity to those improvements than do the vacant undeveloped properties that are not actively being developed or are further from those shared improvements. Therefore, it has been determined that parcels identified as Undeveloped Residential Property shall be assigned a proportional EBU that is twenty percent (20%) of that assigned to developed properties, which is 1.0 EBU per applied acre (20% of the 5.0 EBU per acre assigned to Developed Non-Residential property), but unlike parcels designated as Vacant Undeveloped Property, there is no acreage cap for the parcel (e.g., an Undeveloped Residential Property which is 7.00-acres would be assigned 7.00 EBU [7.0 acres x 1.0 EBU/acre]).

Undeveloped Non-Residential Property – This land use classification includes undeveloped properties that were originally identified as Planned Non-Residential Development parcels, but have not yet been developed or subdivided, but are either adjacent to or in close proximity to improvements that will be maintained for the current fiscal year, and/or the property is actively being developed. While many of the improvements within the District will generally be constructed and accepted for maintenance in large part as properties are being subdivided or developed and those properties will clearly receive a particular and distinct benefit (direct special benefits) from those improvements, it is also recognized that certain improvements within the District are installed in advance of property development that are considered shared improvements that collectively support the overall development of properties within the District and Zones to their full and best use, including the vacant undeveloped properties. However, it is also recognized that some of these shared improvements within the District have a more direct and particular benefit to those undeveloped properties directly adjacent to the improvements or in close proximity to those improvements than do the vacant undeveloped properties that are not actively being developed or are further from those shared improvements. Therefore, it has been determined that parcels identified as Undeveloped Non-Residential Property shall be assigned a proportional EBU that is twenty percent (20%) of that assigned to developed properties, which is 1.0 EBU per applied acre (20% of the 5.0 EBU per acre assigned to Developed Non-Residential property), but unlike parcels designated as Vacant Undeveloped Property, there is no acreage cap for the parcel (e.g., an Undeveloped Non-Residential Property which is 7.00-acres would be assigned 7.00 EBU [7.0 acres x 1.0 EBU/acre]).

Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Special Case Parcels – In many landscaping and lighting districts (particularly districts that have a wide range of land uses, phased developments, and/or diversity in the location and type of improvements) there may be one or more parcels to be assessed that the standard land use classifications and proportionalities, previously defined, do not accurately identify the use and special benefit received from the improvements. Properties that are typically classified as Special Case Parcels usually involve partial or mixed use development of the property or development restrictions whether those restrictions are temporary or permanent and affect the properties proportional special benefit. Examples of such restrictions may include situations where only a portion of the parcel’s total acreage is or can be developed. In such a case, the net acreage of the parcel that is utilized rather than the gross acreage of the parcel may be applied to calculate the parcel’s proportional special benefit similar to how the Public School site parcel is treated.

Each such parcel shall be addressed on a case-by-case basis by the Assessment Engineer and the EBU assigned to such parcels shall be based on the specific issues related to that parcel and its proportional special benefit compared to other properties that receive special benefits from the improvements.

Exempt Properties – Within most districts, there are lots or parcels of land that do not receive a special benefit from the improvements provided (exempt from assessment), which may include, but is not limited to public streets and other roadways (typically not assigned an APN by the County); dedicated public easements, public rights-of-way, or utility rights-of-way; common areas, bifurcated lots; sliver parcels or any other parcel that has little or no assessed value and cannot be developed independently; parcels that are part of the improvements being maintained by the District or that the City has determined that the parcel cannot be developed. These types of parcels are considered to receive no special benefit from the improvements and are therefore exempted from assessment and are assigned 0.00 EBU.

A summary of the applied Equivalent Benefit Units (EBUs) for the various land use classifications within the District is shown in the following table:

Assessment Land Use
Single Family Residential 1.00 EBU per Unit/Parcel
Multi-Family Residential 0.80 EBU per Unit
Developed Non-Residential 5.00 EBU per Acre
Public School Property 5.00 EBU per Adjusted Acreage
Planned Residential Development 0.50 EBU per Unit
Planned Non-Residential Development 2.50 EBU per Acre
Vacant Undeveloped Property 1.00 EBU per Acre (Maximum of 5 Acres) Approved Residential Development 1.00 EBU per Unit
Approved Non-Residential 5.00 EBU per Acre
Approved Multi-Residential 0.80 EBU per Unit
Approved Condominium Property 1.00 EBU per Unit
Undeveloped Residential Property 1.00 EBU per Acre
Undeveloped Non-Residential 1.00 EBU per Acre
Planned Multi-Family Residential 0.80 EBU per Unit
Exempt EBU per Acre -
Special Case 1.00 EBU per Acre
Equivalent Benefit Unit Formula
Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Equivalent Benefit Unit Summary
The following is a summary of the Equivalent Benefit Units applicable to the various land use classifications identified in each District Zone or Sub-Zone:

Zone A
Sub-Zone B1
Sub-Zone B2
Sub-Zone B3
Assessment Land Use
Total
Parcels
Residential
Units/Lots
Applied
Acreage
Equivalent Benefit
Units (EBU)
Vacant Undeveloped Property 1 4.64 - 4.64
Undeveloped Non-Residential 2 16.85 - 16.85
Exempt 1 1.77 - -
Totals 4 23.26 - 21.49
Assessment Land Use
Total
Parcels
Residential
Units/Lots
Applied
Acreage
Equivalent Benefit
Units (EBU)
Single Family Residential 444 444 - 444.00
Exempt 23 4.96 - -
Totals 467 444 4.96 444.00
Assessment Land Use
Total
Parcels
Residential
Units/Lots
Applied
Acreage
Equivalent Benefit
Units (EBU)
Vacant Undeveloped Property 1 4.79 - 4.79
Exempt 2 12.91 - -
Totals 3 17.70 - 4.79
Assessment Land Use
Total
Parcels
Residential
Units/Lots
Applied
Acreage
Equivalent Benefit
Units (EBU)
Vacant Undeveloped Property 4 20.00 - 20.00
Exempt 2 9.58 - -
Totals 6 29.58 - 20.00
Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Part III – Estimate of Costs
Calculation of Assessments
An assessment amount per Equivalent Benefit Unit (Assessment per EBU) is calculated by:

Taking the “Total Annual Expenses” (Total budgeted costs) and subtracting the “Total General Benefit Expenses” (Landscaping General Benefit Expenses and/or Lighting General Benefit Expenses), to establish the “Total Special Benefit Expenses;” Total Annual Expenses – General Benefit Expenses = Special Benefit Expenses To the resulting “Special Benefit Expenses,” various “Funding Adjustments” may be applied that may include, but are not limited to:
➢ “Reserve Fund Transfer/Deduction,” represents an amount of available existing funds from the “Operational Reserve Fund Balances” being applied to pay a portion of the Special Benefit Expenses for the fiscal year.
➢ “Additional City Funding,” represents an adjustment that is typically used to address any funding gap between the amount budgeted to provide the improvements and services (“Special Benefit Expenses”); and the amount that will be collected through the assessments.

This funding may be addressed by an additional City contribution or loan from the City which is intended to be recovered in future fiscal years.

These adjustments to the Special Benefit Expenses result in the net special benefit amount to be assessed “Balance to Levy;”
Special Benefit Expenses - Funding Adjustments = Balance to Levy The amount identified as the “Balance to Levy” is divided by the total number of EBUs of parcels that receive special benefit to establish the Assessment Rate (“Assessment Per EBU”). This Assessment Rate is then applied back to each parcel’s individual EBU to calculate the parcel’s proportionate special benefit and assessment amount for the improvements.

Balance to Levy / Total EBU = Assessment Per EBU (Assessment Rate) Assessment Per EBU x Parcel EBU = Parcel Assessment Amount Note: The maximum assessments and proposed assessments for fiscal year 2024/2025 outlined in this Report are intended to fully support the expenses identified as “Special Benefit Expenses.” Consequently, there are no “Funding Adjustments” reflected in the budgets, the “Balance to Levy” is equal to the total “Special Benefit Expenses.”
Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Zone Budgets and Assessments
The Zone budgets and assessments outlined on the following page for the District are based on the City’s estimate of the expenses and related funding necessary for the operation, maintenance and servicing of the District improvements identified in Part I of this Report for Zone A and Zone B for fiscal year 2024/2025.

The Maximum Assessment per EBU (Maximum Assessment Rates) for Zone A and Zone B (SubZones B1, B2, and B3) represents the calculated authorized maximum assessment rates for fiscal year 2024/2025 based on the assessment rates presented to the property owners of record within the District as part of the Ballot Proceeding in fiscal year 2017/2018, adjusted by the authorized Assessment Range Formula of 3.5% per year. Reference is hereby made to the Assessment Range Formula described after the budget.

Refer to the Assessment Roll outlined in “Part IV — Assessment Roll” to reference the individual assessment amounts proposed to be levied and collected for each parcel in fiscal year 2024/2025.

A listing of the parcels to be assessed within this District along with the assessment amounts has been filed with the City Clerk in an electronic format and is by reference made part of this Report.

Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Zone Budgets & Assessments, Fiscal Year 2024/2025
Zone A Zone B Zone B Zone B TOTAL BUDGET
Sub-Zone B1 Sub-Zone B2 Sub-Zone B3 Assessment
Fiscal Year
2024/2025

ANNUAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE EXPENSES
Annual Lighting Operation & Maintenance Expenses $ 236 $ 24,561 $ 67 $ 136 $ 25,000 Annual Landscaping Operation & Maintenance Expenses - 88,432 470 1,098 90,000 TOTAL ANNUAL OPERATION & MAINTENANCE EXPENSES $ 112,993 236 $ $ 536 $ 1,234 $ 115,000

REHABILITATION/RENOVATION FUNDING & CAPITAL EXPENDITURES Lighting Rehabilitation/Renovation Funding -$ $ - $ - $ - $ - Landscape Improvement Rehabilitation/Renovation Funding - - - - - Planned Capital Expenditures (For Fiscal Year) -$ $ - $ - $ - $ - TOTAL REHABILITATION/RENOVATION FUNDING & CAPITAL EXPENDITURES -$ $ - $ - $ - $ -

INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
Operational Reserves (Collection) -$ $ - $ - $ - $ -
District Administration Expenses $ 51 $ 25,650 $ 121 $ 277 $ 26,100 County Administration Fee 2 955 5 10 972
Annual Administration Expenses 53 26,605 126 288 27,072 TOTAL INCIDENTAL EXPENSES $ 26,605 53 $ $ 126 $ 288 $ 27,072 TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENSES $ 139,599 290 $ $ 662 $ 1,522 $ 142,072

GENERAL BENEFIT EXPENSES
Lighting General Benefit — City Funded (24)$ $ (972) $ (7) $ (14) $ (1,015) Landscaping General Benefit — City Funded - (5,696) (28) (70) (5,795) TOTAL GENERAL BENEFIT EXPENSES (24)$ $ (6,668) $ (35) $ (84) $ (6,810) TOTAL SPECIAL BENEFIT EXPENSES $ 132,931 266 $ $ 627 $ 1,438 $ 135,262

FUNDING ADJUSTMENTS
Reserve Fund Transfer/Deduction -$ $ - $ - $ - $ -
Additional City Funding - - - - -
TOTAL FUNDING ADJUSTMENTS / CONTRIBUTIONS -$ $ - $ - $ - $ - BALANCE TO LEVY $ 132,931$ 266 $ 1,438$ 627 $ 135,262

DISTRICT STATISTICS
Total Parcels 4 467 3 6 480
Assessed Parcels 3 444 1 4 452
Equivalent Benefit Units (EBU) 21.49 444.00 4.79 20.00 490.28 Assessment Per EBU $12.38 $299.40 $130.94 $71.90
Maximum Assessment Rate Per EBU $49.62 $757.01 $757.01 $757.01

FUND BALANCE
Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 1,254$ $ 281,142 $ 7,937 $ 1,433 $ 291,767 Operational Reserve & Rehabilitation Funding Collected - - - - - Estimated Ending Fund Balance 1,254$ $ 281,142 $ 7,937 $ 1,433 $ 291,767

BUDGET ITEMS
Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Assessment Range Formula
Any new or increased assessment requires certain noticing and meeting requirements by law.

The Brown Act defines the terms “new or increased assessment” to exclude certain conditions.

These certain conditions included “any assessment that does not exceed an assessment formula or range of assessments previously adopted by the agency or approved by the voters in the area where the assessment is imposed.”
Recognizing that the cost of maintaining the improvements will increase over time due to inflation, the maximum assessments (initial maximum assessment amounts and maximum assessment rates established in fiscal year 2017/2018) for Zone A and Zone B, include a fixed 3.5% annual inflationary adjustment (Assessment Range Formula). This 3.5% annual adjustment provides for reasonable increases and inflationary adjustment to the initial maximum assessment rates approved by the property owners as part of the protest ballot proceeding conducted in connection with the formation of the District.

The adoption of the maximum assessment rates and the Assessment Range Formula described herein does not mean that the annual assessments will necessarily increase each fiscal year, nor does it absolutely restrict the assessments to the adjustment maximum assessment amount.

Although the maximum assessment rates that may be levied shall be adjusted (inflated) by 3.5% each year, the actual amount to be assessed will be based on the Balance to Levy for that fiscal year. If the calculated assessment is less than the adjusted maximum assessment, then the calculated assessment may be approved by the City Council for collection. If the calculated assessment (based on the proposed budget) is greater than the adjusted maximum assessment for that fiscal year, then the assessment would be considered an increased assessment and would require property owner approval through a protest ballot proceeding before imposing such an increase. Otherwise, it would be necessary to reduce the budget or provide a contribution from the City to reduce the Balance to Levy (amount to be assessed) to an amount that can be supported by an assessment rate less than or equal to the maximum assessment rate authorized for that fiscal year.

The Assessment Range Formula (3.5% annual adjustment) shall be applied to the maximum assessment rates for Zone A and Zone B identified in the District Budgets Establishing Maximum Assessments as presented in this Report, commencing in fiscal year 2018/2019 and all subsequent fiscal years unless the City Council formally suspends its application.

Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Part IV — Assessment Roll
Due to the number of parcels in the District, the Assessment Roll for fiscal year 2024/2025 (a listing of the parcels to be assessed within this District along with the assessment amounts) has been filed with the City Clerk in an electronic format and is by reference made part of this Report.

The proposed Assessment Roll shall be available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office during normal office hours.

The Assessment Roll reflects all properties currently identified within the District and their assessment amount(s) for fiscal year 2024/2025. Each parcel listed on the Assessment Roll is currently shown and illustrated on the County Assessor’s Roll and the County Assessor’s Parcel Number Maps (APN maps). These records are by reference made part of this Report and shall govern for all details concerning the description of the lots or parcels. All assessments presented on the assessment roll are subject to change as a result of parcel changes made by the County including parcel splits, parcel merges or development changes that occur prior to the County Assessor's Office securing the final roll and generating tax bills for fiscal year 2024/2025.

Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Part V — District Diagrams
The lots and parcels of land within the Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District consist of the lots and parcels within the planned non-residential and residential development areas identified in the DJ Farms Specific Plan and commonly referred to as the Pasadera development located on the south side of Main Street near Obispo Street and Flower Avenue.

The District Diagrams provided on the following pages provide a visual depiction of the boundaries of the District and the Zones and Sub-Zones applicable for fiscal year 2024/2025. These diagrams also provide a visual depiction of the location and extent of the improvements to be maintained within the District at build-out. The combination of these Diagrams and the Assessment Roll contained in Part IV of this Report constitutes the Assessment Diagram for this District and encompasses all lots, parcels and subdivisions of land that receive or will receive a special benefit from the improvements to be provided in the District at the time this Report was prepared.

The lines and dimensions of each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land contained in these diagrams are inclusive of the parcels listed in “Part IV — Assessment Roll” of this Report as they existed at the time this Report was prepared and shall include all subsequent subdivisions, lot-line adjustments, or parcel changes therein.

Reference is hereby made to the Santa Barbara County Assessor’s Parcel Maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of each parcel within the Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District including all subsequent subdivisions, lot-line adjustments, or parcel changes therein.

Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

District Diagram – Boundary and Zones, Fiscal Year 2024/2025 Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

District Diagram – Development and Improvements Planned at Buildout Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District
Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

District Diagram – Development and Improvements, Fiscal Year 2024/2025

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-43

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GUADALUPE, COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR THE PASADERA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT AND DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL’S INTENT TO LEVY AN

ASSESSMENT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Guadalupe, California, has, by previous Resolutions, formed the Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District and initiated proceedings for the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2024/2025 pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “1972 Act”) that authorizes the levy and collection of assessments by the County of Santa Barbara on behalf of the City of Guadalupe to pay the maintenance and services landscaping, appurtenant facilities and operations related thereto; and, WHEREAS, the City previously determined that the assessments for the District were approved in accordance with the requirements of the California Constitution, Articles XIIID; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has retained Willdan Financial Services for the purpose of assisting with the Annual Levy of the District, and to prepare and file an Engineer’s Annual Levy Report with the City Clerk in accordance with the 1972 Act; and,
WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report, which describes the District and improvements and includes the proposed budgets and assessments for Fiscal Year 2024/2025; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully examined and reviewed the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report as presented and is preliminarily satisfied with the District, each of the budget items and documents as set forth therein, and is satisfied that the proposed assessments contained therein, have been spread in accordance with the benefits received from the improvements, operation, maintenance, and services to be performed within the District, as set forth in said Report; and WHEREAS, the City Council had ordered Willdan Financial Services to file the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report concerning the levy of assessments for the District in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22622 of the 1972 Act with the City Clerk of the City of Guadalupe; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City Council to levy an assessment for the Fiscal Year 2024/2025 as specified in said Engineer’s Report
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Guadalupe as follows:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby declares its intention to seek the annual levy and collection of assessments within the Pasadera Landscaping and Lighting District pursuant to the 1972 ATTACHMENT 4

Act, over and including the land within the boundaries of said District, and to levy and collect assessments on such land to pay the annual costs and expenses of the improvements and services described in the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report, for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.

SECTION 3. The boundaries of the District is described in the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report, as ordered by previous Resolution, and a copy of the District boundaries is on file in the office of Public Works. The District as outlined in the Engineer’s Report, incorporates Zones of benefit as authorized in accordance with Chapter 1, Sections 22568 and 22570 of the 1972 Act, which are designated as:

Zone A
Zone B, including Sub-Zone B1, Sub-Zone B2, and Sub-Zone B3 SECTION 4. The improvements within the District may include any improvements, expenses and services authorized pursuant to the 1972 Act including, but not limited to, the maintenance, operation and servicing of local street lighting, parks, and various landscaping improvements established in connection with development of the properties within the District, and which shall be maintained for the special benefit of those properties. The maintenance and servicing of the improvements generally include, but are not limited to, the materials, equipment, utilities, labor, and incidental expenses, including administrative expenses, required for annual operation, as well as the performance of periodic repairs and replacement activities as needed to provide for the growth, health, and beauty of the parks and landscaping within specified public areas, rights-of-way and/or dedicated easements, the proper operation and functioning of related amenities including, irrigation and drainage systems, specified fencing, hardscapes; sports courts and fields; playground equipment and structures; sidewalks, ornamental or safety lighting; benches, trash receptacles; drinking fountains, picnic facilities and any other equipment, structures or facilities related to the parks and/or landscape areas; and the proper operation of the public street lights and street lighting system within the public rights-of-way which may include, but is not limited to the furnishing of electric current or other illuminating agent; as needed maintenance, repair, and replacement of worn out electrical components and light fixtures, including bulbs, ballasts, photoelectric cells, meters, electrical cables; repair or replacement of damaged poles, ground wires, and conduits caused by accidents, vandalism, time, and weather; and monitoring of the Underground Service Alert (USA) network to prevent damage by excavation. The Engineer’s Annual Levy Report filed with the City Clerk and presented to the City Council more fully describes the improvements proposed for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.

SECTION 5. The Engineer’s Report as presented, consists of the following:
5a.) The Plans and Specifications which describe the boundaries of the District and the improvements associated therewith that provide special benefits to the parcels therein; and, 5b.) The Method of Apportionment that details the method of calculating proportional special benefit and the annual assessment obligation for each affected parcel; and,

5c.) The Estimate of Improvement Costs including the calculation of the assessments and the estimated annual funding (Budget) required for the annual maintenance, servicing, and operation of the parks, landscaping and lighting improvements and specifically the costs associated with the improvements determined to be of special benefit to parcels within the District, establishing the proposed assessments for fiscal year 2024/2025; and, 5d.) The Assessment Range Formula (Annual Inflationary Adjustment) authorized for annual adjustments to the Maximum Assessment Rates per Equivalent Benefit Unit previously established and approved by the property owner(s) of record in a protest ballot proceeding at the time the District was formed pursuant to the California Constitution Article XIIID; and,
5e.) A District Diagram outlining the boundaries of the District and Zones therein for fiscal year 2024/2025; and,
5f.) An Assessment Roll containing the proposed levy of assessment for fiscal year 2024/2025 for each Assessor Parcel Number currently identified within the District; and, SECTION 6. For Fiscal Year 2024/2025, the proposed assessments outlined in the Engineer’s Report are within the assessment limits previously established for the District as approved by the property owners, and do not require additional property owner ballot proceedings at this time for any assessment increase in accordance with the requirements of the California Constitution, Article XIIID.

SECTION 7. The City Council hereby declares its intention to conduct a public hearing concerning the levy of assessments for the District in accordance with Chapter 3, Section 22626 of the 1972 Act.

SECTION 8. Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing on these matters will be held by the City Council on Tuesday, July 23, 2024 at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as feasible in the City Hall (Council Chambers), located at 918 Obispo Street, Guadalupe, California.

SECTION 9. The City Clerk or their designee is hereby authorized and directed to give notice of the time and place of the Public Hearing for the District and assessments as provided by law by causing the publishing notice of the public hearing once in the local newspaper not less than ten (10) days before the date of the public hearing.

SECTION 10. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained.

In doing so, the City Clerk shall consult with the City Administrator and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting on the 9th day of July 2024 by the following vote:

MOTION:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

RECUSED:

I, Amelia M. Villegas, City Clerk of the City of Guadalupe DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 2024-43, has been duly signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of the City Council, held July 9, 2024, and that same was approved and adopted.

ATTEST:
___________________________________ ________________________________ Amelia M. Villegas, City Clerk Ariston Julian, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
Philip F. Sinco, City Attorney

Agenda Item No. 8H

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GUADALUPE
Agenda of July 9, 2024

_______________________________ _________________________________ Prepared by: Approved by:

Jeff van den Eikhof, City Engineer Todd Bodem, City Administrator SUBJECT: Water Standby Charges, Fiscal Year 2024-25
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2024-44 directing staff to forward to the Auditor’s Controller’s Office of the County of Santa Barbara the Water Standby Charges for vacant parcels within the City of Guadalupe for Fiscal Year 2024 – 25.

DISCUSSION:

In 1991, voters in the City of Guadalupe approved the City’s participation in the Coastal Aqueduct of the State Water Project. Participation was approved at the 550 acre-feet (605 acre-feet with drought buffer)-per-year level. To participate in the Project, the City became a Central Coast Water Authority (CCWA) member. CCWA membership comprises all Santa Barbara County water purveyors participating in the Project.

Funding for the construction of the Coastal Aqueduct and associated facilities was accomplished through voter-approved bonds. One of the bond issuance conditions requires each participant to maintain a “coverage ratio” of 1.25. That means that each participant must have an annual net income (revenue minus expenses) 25% higher than the required debt service payments.

Water rates for current customers are set with the debt service ratio in mind, but participation in the State Water Project also benefits vacant parcels in the City that are currently not using City water.

Participation in the State Water Project makes it possible for these parcels to develop in the future because State Water will be needed to meet future buildout needs.

As a result, in 1993, the City imposed water standby charges on vacant parcels. These charges are permitted by Section 38743 of the Government Code of the State of California. Consistent with Government Code Section 38743, it was determined that for parcels of less than 1 acre, the charge would be $5.00 per month. For parcels of 1 acre or more, the charge would be $10.00 per month per acre or part thereof.

Jeff van den Eikhof

The most significant changes in the water standby charge list in the past year are due to the continuing development of Pasadera/DJ Farms.

The establishment of, or an increase to, these charges requires compliance with the procedures described in Proposition 218. State law permits water standby charges to be set annually by resolution of the City Council if the rates are not changed from the previous year. The City’s fees are not proposed to be increased from the previous year.

FISCAL IMPACT: None. Resolution No. 2024-44 establishes the same rates as charged in the past.

The water standby fees for fiscal year 2024 – 2025 total as follows:

Number of parcels: 102
Total assessment: $25,860.00
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution No. 2024-44

2. Property Tax Roll 24 – 25 Fund 0642
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-44

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY GUADALUPE DIRECTING STAFF TO FORWARD TO THE SANTA BARBARA COUNTY AUDITOR’S OFFICE WATER STANDBY CHARGES FOR VACANT PARCELS WITHIN THE CITY OF GUADALUPE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025
WHEREAS, the City of Guadalupe historically obtained all its domestic water from wellstapping the Santa Maria River Basin aquifer; and
WHEREAS, voters in Guadalupe in 1991 approved the City’s participation in the State Water Project to increase available water supplies for current and future needs and make those supplies more reliable; and
WHEREAS, the City’s participation in the State Water Projects increases the costs to provide water service to the residents of Guadalupe; and
WHEREAS, Section 38743 of the Government Code of the State of California allows for an annual water service standby charge to be applied on a per parcel basis to areas in which water service is made available, whether the water service is currently being used or not; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Guadalupe adopted Resolution No. 93-20 on August 9, 1993, stating that the correct and equitable standby charges should be $5.00 per month for each vacant parcel less than one acre in size, and $10.00 per month per acre, or portion thereof, for each vacant parcel of one acre or more; and
WHEREAS, Section 38743 of the Government Code of the State of California allows for the standby charge to be collected as part of the annual general county tax bill by forwarding to the Santa Barbara County Auditor’s office a list of each parcel upon which the standby charges will be levied plus the amount of said levy; and
WHEREAS, each fiscal year the City of Guadalupe must report to the Santa Barbara County Auditor’s office if the levy is to remain the same, be changed, or be abolished; and WHEREAS, the standby charge may be set by a resolution of the City Council if it is not increased.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Guadalupe, that staff is directed to forward to the Santa Barbara County Auditor Controller’s office a list of parcels upon which the standby charge will be levied (attached hereto as Exhibit “A”), and to indicate that the total levy for fiscal year 2024-2025 will be $25,860.00 in total coming from 102 parcels.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting on the 9 th day of July 2024 by the following
vote:

ATTACHMENT 1

MOTION:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

I, Amelia M. Villegas, City Clerk of the City of Guadalupe DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being Resolution No. 2024-44, has been duly signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of the City Council, held July 9, 2024, and that same was approved and adopted.

ATTEST:
______________________________ ____________________________________ Amelia M. Villegas, City Clerk Ariston Julian, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________
Philip F. Sinco, City Attorney
District Name: Guadalupe Water Standby Fee
Description: Fund 0642, Water Standby Charge
Tax Year: 2024-25
Contact Person: City Administrator, (805) 356-3891
Total # of Assessments: 102
Total Assessment Amount: $25,860.00
ATTACHMENT 2

EXHIBIT A
Fund Number Parcel Number Amount
0642 113-080-018 10320.00
0642 113-370-037 60.00
0642 113-370-038 60.00
0642 113-450-001 840.00
0642 113-450-002 1200.00
0642 113-450-003 600.00
0642 113-470-022 60.00
0642 113-470-023 60.00
0642 113-490-031 60.00
0642 113-490-032 60.00
0642 113-490-033 60.00
0642 113-490-180 60.00
0642 113-490-217 60.00
0642 115-010-016 360.00
0642 115-020-032 60.00
0642 115-020-033 60.00
0642 115-020-035 60.00
0642 115-031-001 60.00
0642 115-032-005 60.00
0642 115-034-016 60.00
0642 115-035-001 60.00
0642 115-036-002 60.00
0642 115-036-015 60.00
0642 115-036-018 60.00
0642 115-041-010 60.00
0642 115-042-006 60.00
0642 115-042-007 60.00
0642 115-042-008 60.00
0642 115-042-013 60.00
0642 115-042-019 60.00
0642 115-043-002 360.00
0642 115-052-006 60.00
0642 115-063-002 60.00
0642 115-063-011 60.00
0642 115-071-015 60.00
0642 115-071-016 60.00
0642 115-071-017 60.00
0642 115-071-018 60.00
0642 115-072-014 60.00
0642 115-072-015 60.00
0642 115-072-018 60.00
0642 115-082-009 60.00
0642 115-082-021 240.00
0642 115-091-006 60.00
0642 115-092-002 60.00
0642 115-092-005 60.00
0642 115-092-015 60.00
0642 115-092-019 60.00
Fund Number Parcel Number Amount
0642 115-092-023 60.00
0642 115-101-003 60.00
0642 115-101-009 60.00
0642 115-102-002 240.00
0642 115-102-013 60.00
0642 115-102-015 60.00
0642 115-102-016 60.00
0642 115-102-017 60.00
0642 115-102-018 60.00
0642 115-102-022 60.00
0642 115-103-010 120.00
0642 115-103-012 60.00
0642 115-112-002 60.00
0642 115-113-004 60.00
0642 115-113-005 60.00
0642 115-113-006 60.00
0642 115-121-001 60.00
0642 115-121-002 60.00
0642 115-121-007 60.00
0642 115-121-021 60.00
0642 115-122-001 60.00
0642 115-132-016 60.00
0642 115-140-005 60.00
0642 115-140-015 3240.00
0642 115-140-016 240.00
0642 115-140-021 60.00
0642 115-140-026 480.00
0642 115-140-027 240.00
0642 115-162-024 60.00
0642 115-180-027 240.00
0642 115-180-030 240.00
0642 115-180-031 60.00
0642 115-193-019 60.00
0642 115-201-011 60.00
0642 115-201-012 60.00
0642 115-201-013 60.00
0642 115-202-002 60.00
0642 115-202-010 60.00
0642 115-210-019 360.00
0642 115-210-020 600.00
0642 115-230-005 720.00
0642 115-280-006 60.00
0642 115-280-007 60.00
0642 115-280-008 60.00
0642 115-280-009 60.00
0642 115-280-010 60.00
0642 115-280-011 60.00
0642 115-280-012 60.00
Fund Number Parcel Number Amount
0642 115-280-013 60.00
0642 115-280-014 60.00
0642 115-280-015 60.00
0642 115-280-016 60.00
0642 115-280-017 60.00
0642 115-280-018 240.00

PLANNING DEPARTMENT
City of Guadalupe
918 Obispo Street
P.O. Box 908
Guadalupe, CA 93434
Tel (805) 356-3903
To: Mr. Mayor and City Councilmembers
From: David Swenk, Contract City Planner
Date: July 1, 2024
RE: Planning Report Covering June 2024

MINISTERIAL PROJECTS
Zoning Clearances Approved 3
Zoning Clearances Denied
Zoning Verification Letters 0
Business Licenses Approved 2
Business Licenses Denied 0
ADUs approved 1
AUP for short-term rental 0

DISCRETIONARY PROJECTS
Please refer to the next page for specific projects and their current status.

If you have any questions regarding any projects listed in this report, please contact me at [email protected] call (805) 714-1422.

Agenda Item No. 9A
Ministerial Permit Report– June 2024
(reported 07/01//24)
Zoning Clearance Applications Submitted
2024-026-ZC Buenrretro Concrete 4373 Ladera Dr
2024-027-PA Pereyra Lot Split 595 Campodonico
2024-028-ZC Newman Driveway 4406 Fir St.

Zoning Clearances Approvals
2024-025-ZC Gonzalez ADU 255 Campodonico
2024-026-ZC Buenrretro Concrete 4373 Ladera Dr
2024-028-ZC Newman Driveway 4406 Fir St.

Zoning Clearances Denied
None
Map Clearance Applications Submitted
None
Business License Approvals
Auto Repair J’s Auto Repair 333 Guadalupe St.

Service Station Gas 4 Less 751 Guadalupe St.
(Change in Ownership)

Business License Denials
None
Administrative Use Permits
None

GUADALUPE CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PLANNING PROCESS SUMMARY FOR JUNE 2024
Case No. Name/Location Submittal
Date
Comp. Date Status OK for Bldg
Permit Issuance
2024-004-LS$ Alvarez Lot Split
4513 11th Street
01/29/24 Inc.
02/12/24
Application has resumed processing as lot
configuration now meets City Ordinance minimal lot
sizes. Application is to be processed as a standard lot split, Completeness Letter Sent, NOE and Staff
Report to be developed.

NO
2023-080-DR Zakour Multi
Family
1145 Pacheco
Street
11/15/23 Inc.
12/13/23
Incomplete Letter sent 12/13/23, still awaiting
response
NO
2023-047-LLA$ Alvarez 11th Street
(No Address)
07/11/23 NA Planning signed off on legal documents and
forwarded to City Engineer for final processing and
submittal to the Surveyor for recording.

NO
2023-021-LLA$ 151 Obispo Street 03/30/23 02/05/24 Staff met with Project Surveyor for project status.

Record of Survey was completed, updated LLA
exhibit to be revised as the applicant has decided to
move forward with a 4 vs the 3 lot LLA that was
preliminarily approved. Conceptual layout sent by
applicants surveyor for review and comment.
2023-013-LS SB-9
Split$
Reed Lot Split
428 Tognazzini
Ave.
03/07/23 Review was completed by All City depts. Need
revised map with updated City Engineer info and
cover letter to complete packet which was forwarded
to him. City Engineer responded to applicant to
revise plan to update and resubmit. Once provided,
will send to County Surveyor for review and
recordation. Staff is researching potential AB 1033
applicability.

NO
2022-093-LS
Residential Lot
Split$
Lupe Alvarez
246 Egret Lane
12/19/22 Review was completed by All City depts. Applicant to provide materials and fees needed for the County
Surveyor review and fees paid for recordation, none
received as to this date. Staff has conferred with
applicant.

NO
2022-088-LM
Voluntary Lot
Merger$
Trudy Brands
Tognazzini Ave.

No Address
12/05/22 Under review by City Engineer NO
2022-063-LM
Voluntary Lot
Merger $
Mahoney Lot
Merger
147 Tognazzini
Ave.
08/11/22 Inc.
09/11/22
Incomplete letter sent 09/11/22. Applicant has not
responded to letter. Intent to Close Letter processed.

NO
2022-016-GPZ
2022-017-DR
2022-018-VTTM$
Snowy Plover 03/10/22 Inc.
04/09/22
Applicant met with staff on 05/08/24 to resume
processing. Civil design has been revised based on
staff input to resolve issues and resubmit. Staff is
preparing RFP for 3rd party soils engineer to be paid
by applicant to evaluate Civil Engineering Design for
slope stabilization and per FCD comments.

NO
6th Cycle Housing
Element
Mandatory
Update
Fall 2002 NA Received a 4th round of comments on draft Housing Element from HCD on 06/28/24, staff is evaluating
the comments for a response.

NA
Agenda Item No. 9B
Building Inspections Log - June 2024

4875 El Camino Real • Atascadero, CA 93422 • Phone: 805-470-1910 • eikhofdesigngroup.com City Engineer Report
June 2024
The following is a list of projects in various construction, design, or planning stages. • Miscellaneous Measure A Work—The City Engineer attended the June TTAC/JTAC/TPAC meetings.

Coordinated with SBCAG Staff regarding Safe Routes to School funding and prepared Staff Report and Resolution to accept the funding. Prepared SB125 CARB documents for TIRCP. • Transit—The City Engineer met with Santa Maria Regional Transit and SMOOTH to discuss the existing buses and various agreements between the City of Guadalupe and the City of Santa Maria. • Various Caltrans Projects – Future Caltrans projects include the Hwy 1/166 Signalization Project, the ADA Improvement Project, the Santa Maria River Bridge Project, the Pavement Project through Guadalupe, and two shoulder widening projects on Hwy 1 both north and south of the City.

The City Engineer has met regularly with the Caltrans project manager and other Caltrans staff regarding the improvements to the downtown area, the Hwy 1/166 Improvements, and the Santa Maria bridge.

Caltrans needs additional right-of-way on West Main at the Hwy 1/166 Intersection for its work. The Right-Of-Way Division will negotiate with the adjacent property owner to relocate the ditch. • Amtrak Station Improvements (Transit Hub) –A Request for Proposals (RFP) is being prepared to send to engineering/architectural firms to provide design services for the Transit Hub project. A staff report will be presented to the City Council in August or September to approve the design contract.

Depending on the project costs, the project may include public restrooms, electric vehicle charging infrastructure, bicycle amenities, pervious pavers, improved signage, and site beautification upgrades. The total project funding is $1.3 million.
• Central Park Renovation Project—The City Engineer met with the design team to discuss the project, which is in its final stages of development. Construction is anticipated to begin in Summer 2025.
• Leroy Park Phase II Improvements— The Construction Documents, including the plans, specifications, and Preliminary Architect’s report, were resubmitted to the USDA during the last week of May. The City Engineer is awaiting review and approval by the USDA. Once the funding has been approved, the City Engineer will be ready to send the project out to bid. The project is anticipated to be brought to the City Council in September for approval. • 303 Obispo Street Site Improvements – The design of the 303 Obispo Street Site Improvements is ongoing. City staff holds bi-weekly meetings with PG&E and the design team regarding the project.

The project includes charging facilities for future electric buses and electric fleet vehicles.

Agenda Item No. 9C

• Highway 1 and Pioneer Lift Stations – The Highway 1 Lift Station is currently waiting for the electrical switch gear to be provided. This equipment has an approximate 50-week lead time. A revised Caltrans Encroachment Permit was submitted to Caltrans for the Pioneer Lift Station the last week of June. The Pioneer Lift Station cannot be constructed until the Highway 1 Lift Station is completed. However, due to the long procurement process for switchgear, the City Engineer intends to bid the Pioneer Lift Station this summer for construction in the Fall of 2025.

The City Engineer meets regularly with the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), who is overseeing funding of the Pioneer Lift Station Project. • Waste Water Treatment Plant Improvements –At the end of May, a Consolidation Planning Grant application was submitted to the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This planning grant will fund studies to explore the potential of sending the City of Guadalupe sewage to the City of Santa Maria.

Water Board Staff recommended that the City explore these possibilities due to the aging nature of the wastewater treatment plant and continued effluent violations. Water Board Staff attended the first City Council meeting in June to discuss the consolidation planning grant.

MKN is working with WWTP staff and the Regional Board to bring the City’s wastewater treatment plant into compliance with our current permit. The Biolac portion of the WWTP is not functioning properly, and a project to make those repairs is being designed. Plans have been submitted to the City Engineer for review and bidding.
• City Hall Improvements—An RFP is being prepared to bring a design team on board to prepare plans and specifications for the renovations and repairs to City Hall. A recommendation will be brought to the City Council in a few months to approve the consultant agreement. As an Essential Services Building, most of the work on City Hall will entail structural and seismic upgrades, including walls, roof, foundation repair, and rot repair. The project will also include various improvements to the Public Safety portions of the building. Due to the amount of design work needed, the anticipated start of construction will be sometime in 2025.
• 2025 Pavement Improvements—Pavement Engineering Inc. performed deflection testing on Obispo Street from Main Street to Ninth Street and West Main from Highway 1 to Julia Drive. Design work on these two sections is ongoing.
• Landscape and Lighting Districts—The City Engineer and his staff have been preparing the engineer’s reports and other documents for the Landscape and Lighting Districts and the Water Standby District.

Development
The following developments, which require engineering review/oversight, are in various phases. • 12th Street Apartment
o The City Engineer reviewed and approved the onsite improvements. The applicant still needs to submit a performance bond for the work in the public right-of-way before an encroachment permit is submitted..
• Pioneer Street Apartments

o The City Engineer approved the building and public improvement plans. A Performance Bond was submitted with an Engineer’s Estimate for the work within the City’s right-of-way.

Work on the project can proceed.
• Pasadera
o The City Engineer worked with Willdan to prepare the Landscape and Lighting District’s Engineering Report.
o The City Engineer met with the Developer and their Engineer to discuss the lift station and bridges. The Developer anticipates receiving all the approvals necessary from the railroad in July to proceed with the construction of the bridges.
• 2023-047 LLA – The City Engineer reviewed and signed the submitted documents for recordation.
• Snowy Plover – The City Engineer has been working with the Planning Department to review the proposed Snowy Plover project.

RECREATION AND PARKS MONTHLY REPORT
For June 2024
Summary of Rentals/Usage for City Facilities & Parks

FACILITY THIS MONTH THIS MONTH

LAST YEAR
THIS YEARTO-DATE
(FY 22/23)
LAST YEARTO-DATE
(FY 21/22)
Auditorium/Gym 13 15 252 171
O’Connell Park 5 25 20 105
LeRoy Park 4 1 29 40
Senior Center 27 10 329 150
Veterans Memorial
Plaza
1 2 5 8
Council Chambers 5 6 103 102
Central Park 0 0 0 0
Veterans Hall 5 1 60 45
Recreation & Parks
918 Obispo Street
P.O. Box 908
Guadalupe, CA 93434
Ph: 805.356.3906
Fax: 805.343.5512
Email: [email protected]
Agenda Item No. 11A
Recreation & Parks Commission Meeting Minutes

CITY OF GUADALUPE

REGULAR MEETING OF THE RECREATION AND PARKS COMMISSSION TUESDAY, June 4, 2024
Call to Order: Recreation Commission Chair- Joe Harris called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.

1. Roll Call: Recreation Manager, Annis Barajas, noted the Commissioner attendance as follows:

Commission Chair: Joseph Harris- Present
Commissioner: Enrique Ortiz- Absent
Commissioner: Emily Dreiling- Present
Commissioner: Michael Jimenez - Present
Commissioner: Arnulfo Navarro – Absent

2. Pledge of Allegiance
Commissioner Chair Joe Harris was recognized and led the Commission in the pledge of allegiance.
*6:01pm Enrique Ortiz present.

3. Community Participation Forum
No participation.

4. Consent Calendar
A. Motion was made by Jimenez, seconded by Dreiling to approve the May 7, 2024, regular meeting minutes. All ayes, 4/0. Motion passed.

Regular Business

5. BGC Monthly Update
Boys and Girls Club did not show up or provide their monthly report that is required by their contract.

6. Jack O’Connell Turf Project Update
Commissioner Dreiling updated the commission on the status of the turf project grant meetings she has had in Sacramento. From the meeting she was also provided two more grants for community projects. One for the grand opening of Las Mujeres Park and one to get the kid out into nature.
*6:09pm Enrique Ortiz present.

7. Las Mujeres Park Update
Recreation Services Manager, Annis Barajas informed the commission that after the Las Mujeres Park meeting, she attended May 2nd she was informed that the future of the project is hinging on the legal negotiations with Verizon. Verizon is the only cellular carrier out of three that will not take their equipment off the water tower long enough for the maintenance and painting to get done. Once an agreement can be reached the water tower project can be done in an estimated 5 months and the park renovation will follow with an estimated 6-month construction timeline. If all goes well the park is estimated to open summer of 2025 but that all depends on the negotiations with Verizon.

8. Guadalupe Adult Softball League
Recreation Services Manager, Annis Barajas let that commission know that the league got cancelled due to not enough registrations.

9. Skate Day Event
Recreation Services Manager, Annis Barajas informed the commission that the Skate Day Event is planned for Saturday, June 15th 12-2pm. It will be located at Jack O’Connell Park. There will be free skates and skating instruction. There will be food

10. Movie Nights
Recreation Services Manager, Annis Barajas informed the commission that the next two months of community movie nights are scheduled. Friday, June 21st and Friday, July 12th are the dates for the first 2 months of movie nights. The movie will be shown inside the LeRoy Park Community Center and start at 6pm. The movies that will be shown are based on community voting that will be done on the recreation social media pages two weeks prior to the movie date.

11. Art in the Park
Recreation Services Manager, Annis Barajas informed the commission that she is in the process of planning an Art in the Park event on June 30th. The event would include Vendors, Food Vendors, Art Class, Craft booths, and games.

12. Commission Requests, Comments, and Meeting Reports

13. Adjournment
At 6:48 p.m. a Motion was made by Commissioner Jimenez, seconded by Commissioner Ortiz for adjournment. The unanimous vote resulted in the meeting’s closure.

Upcoming Programs & Events
Drop-in Sports
Free Drop-in volleyball and basketball is currently taking place. The location/day of dropin varies depending on the availability of the auditorium. Participants ages 16 & 17 must provide a permission slip/liability waiver signed by a parent/legal guardian in order to participate. If under 16 you must be accompanied by a parent/legal guardian in order to participate and both must fill out the slip/liability waiver.

This form can be found on the Recreation Page of the city website. Go to https://ci.guadalupe.ca.us/recreation/
July Drop In Schedule
Movie Night- Recreation Department
Color Run- Recreation Department
Respectfully,
Annis Barajas
Recreation Services Manager

Agenda Item No. 12

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GUADALUPE
Agenda of July 9, 2024

_______________________________ _________________________________ Prepared by: Approved by:

Jeff van den Eikhof, City Engineer Todd Bodem, City Administrator SUBJECT: Guadalupe Benefit Assessment District No. 1 (FY 2024-25) - Public Hearing RECOMMENDATION:
it is recommended that the City Council conduct a public hearing to provide all present with an opportunity to speak regarding the assessments for the Guadalupe Benefit Assessment District No. 1 and that the City adopt Resolution No. 2024-45 setting the proposed assessments.

DISCUSSION:

City Council is responsible for levying assessments based on prior year costs and estimated future costs for lighting and landscaping in the Point Sal Dunes and the Riverview subdivisions of the Guadalupe Benefit Assessment District No. 1. Benefit assessments are established to cover the estimated annual costs for Fiscal Year 2024-2025. In compliance with Section 6066 of the Government Code, benefit assessments require a public hearing.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The Guadalupe Benefit Assessment District No. 1 Fixed Charges Report for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 has been prepared to detail the estimated FY 2024-25 annual costs for the Guadalupe Benefit Assessment District No. 1. (See Exhibit “A.”) The anticipated FY 2024-25 costs are $18,276.66 for Point Sal Dunes and $6,462.40 for Riverview. The proposed costs per parcel are as follows (do not include the County Administrative fee of $1.00 per parcel).

Riverview (50 parcels) Per Parcel Assessment: $129.25
Point Sal Dunes (254 parcels) Per Parcel Assessment: $71.96 The proposed assessment for Point Sal Dunes will increase from $69.79 in 2023-24 to $71.96 in 2024-25.

These costs are pro-rated over time. The proposed assessment for Riverview increased from last year– $120.40 in 2023-24 vs. $129.25 in 2024-25.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution No. 2024-45

2. Exhibit A

3. Property Tax Roll 24-25 Fund 0641
Jeff van den Eikhof
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-45

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY GUADALUPE CONFIRMING LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING CHARGES FOR THE GUADALUPE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND AUTHORIZING THE SANTA BARBARA COUNTY AUDITOR’S OFFICE TO COLLECT SAID BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS FOR THE 2024-2025 TAX YEAR
WHEREAS, Guadalupe Benefit Assessment District No. 1 (“District”) was established by City Council Resolution No. 91-945 on February 11, 1991; and
WHEREAS, boundaries of said District were expanded by Resolution Nos. 91-978, 92-09, and 94-31; and
WHEREAS, said District was established for the purposes of providing street lighting, landscape maintenance, drainage maintenance, and other purposes within the District; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code §54716, a written report containing a description of the parcels in the Guadalupe Benefit Assessment District No. 1 and the amount of the assessments based on the estimated benefit for such parcels has been prepared and was filed with the City Clerk of the City of Guadalupe; and
WHEREAS, the Council designated Tuesday, July 9, 2024, at the hour of 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 918 Obispo Street, Guadalupe, California as the time and place for the hearing of protests and objections in relation to said assessments; and
WHEREAS, notice of said hearing was duly posted and published, and affidavits of said posting and publication have been duly filed; and
WHEREAS, Government Code §54716(d) provides that at said hearing the City Council shall hear and consider all protests and at the conclusion of the hearing the City Council may adopt, revise, change, or modify any assessment and shall make its determination by Resolution upon each proposed assessment described in the said report; and
WHEREAS, the Auditor of Santa Barbara County requires that each year a resolution be passed which identifies the amount to be charged as an annual assessment; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer of the City of Guadalupe has determined that the estimated lighting and landscaping costs with administration for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 will be Six Thousand Four Hundred and Sixty-two Dollars and fourty cents ($6,462.40) for the Riverview Subdivision and Eighteen Thousand Two Hundred Seventy Six Dollars and Sixty-Six Cents ($18,276.66) for Point Sal Dunes Subdivision.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Guadalupe does hereby:

SECTION 1. Allocate the Six Thousand Four Hundred Sixty-Two Dollars and Fourty Cents ($6,462.40) for the Riverview Subdivision among Fifty (50) parcels at the assessment rate of One Hundred Twenty Nine Dollars and Twenty-Five Cents ($129.25) per parcel and the Eighteen Thousand Two Hundred Seventy-Six Dollars and Sixty-six Cents ($18,276.66) for ATTACHMENT 1
Point Sal Dunes Subdivision among Two Hundred Fifty-Four (254) parcels at the assessment rate of Seventy-One Dollars and Ninty-Six Cents ($71.96) as outlined in the 2024-2025 Guadalupe City Assessment District No. 1 Fixed Charges Report (attached hereto as Exhibit “A”); and
SECTION 2. Direct the Santa Barbara County Auditor Controller’s office to collect said benefit assessments for the 2024-2025 tax year at the same time and in the same manner as the general tax levy for the County of Santa Barbara as set forth in Government Code §54716.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to make minor changes herein to address clerical errors, so long as substantial conformance of the intent of this document is maintained.

In doing so, the City Clerk shall consult with the City Administrator and City Attorney concerning any changes deemed necessary.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting on the 9th day of July 2024 by the following vote:

MOTION:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

RECUSED:

I, Amelia Villegas, City Clerk of the City of Guadalupe DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution, being C.C. Resolution No. 2024-45, has been duly signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk, all at a regular meeting of the City Council, held July 9, 2024, and that same was approved and adopted.

ATTEST:
______________________________ ____________________________________ Amelia M. Villegas, City Clerk Ariston Julian, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________
Philip F. Sinco, City Attorney
EXHIBIT “A”
City of Guadalupe
Benefit Assessment District No. 1
Fixed Charges Report
FY 2024-25
ATTACHMENT 2
City of Guadalupe
Benefit Assessment District No. 1
FY 2024-25

RIVERVIEW
(Phase I)
Estimated Lighting and Landscaping
Operation, Maintenance, and Replacement Costs
July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025
This report provides the estimated annual costs for benefit assessment district administration, landscape maintenance, and street lighting for Riverview (Phase I) for FY 2024-25. PG&E street lighting costs are based on Rate Schedule LS-1.

There are 50 parcels within Riverview (Phase I). Each is assessed equally. 07/01/2024

RIVERVIEW
(Phase I)
Estimated Costs
July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025
Overhead Costs:

Overhead costs include Administration, Public Works, and Finance Department oversight, monthly payment of invoices, preparation of the annual cost study, presentation of cost study to City Council at a properly noticed Public Hearing, interaction with the Santa Barbara County Auditor-Controller’s office, and review and sign-off on the annual cost study per State law. Also included is an allowance for street light replacement and a pro-rated cost of liability insurance for the district.

Administration/ Finance per Cost Allocation Study 534.00 Allowance for Street Light Replacement 300.00
City Engineer 1,000.00
Liability Insurance 159.00
Overhead costs $1,993.00
Landscape Maintenance Costs:

The City will either use City staff or contract with a landscaping firm to maintain the district’s street landscaping. The landscaping uses an irrigation system. Periodically, plants, trees, and shrubs need to be replaced.

Contract with landscaping firm of City staff for maintenance of street landscaping 1,209.00 Irrigation water (per City records) 100.00
Allowance for replacement of plants, trees, and shrubs 680.00 Annual Landscaping costs $1,989.00
Street Lighting Costs:

Estimated annual costs for street lighting based on PG&E Rate Schedule LS-1.

Number of Street Lights Rate/Year Total
Riverview 15 $165.36 $2,480.40
TOTAL ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST: $6,462.40
COST PER PARCEL ($6,462.40 / 50 Parcels) $129.24
City of Guadalupe
Benefit Assessment District No. 1
FY 2024-25

POINT SAL DUNES
(Phases I, II, III, IVa, IVb, IVc, Va, and Vb)
Estimated Lighting and Landscaping
Operation, Maintenance and Replacement Costs
July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025
This report provides the estimated annual costs for Benefit Assessment District administration, landscape maintenance, and street lighting for Point Sal Dunes (Phases I, II, III, IVa, IVb, IVc, Va, and Vb) for 2024-25. PG&E street lighting costs are based on Rate Schedule LS-1.

There are 254 parcels within Point Sal Dunes (Phases I, II, III, IVa, IVb, IVc, Va, and Vb). Each is assessed equally.
07/01/2024

POINT SAL DUNES
(Phases I, II, III, IVa, IVb, IVc, Va, and Vb)
Estimated Costs
July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025
Overhead Costs:

Overhead costs include Administration, Public Works, and Finance Department oversight, monthly payment of invoices, preparation of the annual cost study, presentation of cost study to City Council at a properly noticed Public Hearing, interaction with the Santa Barbara County Auditor-Controller’s office, and review and sign-off on the annual cost study per State law. Also included is an allowance for street light replacement and a pro-rated cost of liability insurance for the district.

Administration/ Finance per Cost Allocation Study 1,628.00 Allowance for Street Light Replacement 800.00
City Engineer 1,500.00
Liability Insurance 481.00
Overhead costs $4,409.00
Landscape Maintenance Costs:

The City will either use City staff or contract with a landscaping firm to maintain the district’s street landscaping. The landscaping uses an irrigation system. Periodically, plants, trees, and shrubs need to be replaced.

Contract with landscaping firm of City staff for maintenance of street landscaping 4,815.00 Irrigation water (per City records) 875.00
Allowance for replacement of plants, trees, and shrubs 1,728.62 Annual Landscaping costs $7,418.62
Street Light Electrical Costs:

Estimated annual costs for street lighting based on PG&E Rate Schedule LS-1.

Number of Street Lights Rate/Year Total
Pt. Sal Dunes (all 8 Phases) 39 $165.36 $6,449.04
TOTAL ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST: $18,276.66
COST PER PARCEL ($18.276.66 / 254 Parcels) = $71.96
District Name: Guadalupe Benefit Assessment District #1 Description: Fund 0641, Lighting and Landscaping
Tax Year: 2024-25
Contact Person: City Administrator, (805) 356-3891
Total # of Assessments: 304
Total Assessment Amount: $24,739.84
ATTACHMENT 3
Fund Number Parcel Number Amount
0641 113-380-001 71.96
0641 113-380-002 71.96
0641 113-380-003 71.96
0641 113-380-004 71.96
0641 113-380-005 71.96
0641 113-380-006 71.96
0641 113-380-007 71.96
0641 113-380-008 71.96
0641 113-380-009 71.96
0641 113-380-010 71.96
0641 113-380-011 71.96
0641 113-380-012 71.96
0641 113-380-013 71.96
0641 113-380-014 71.96
0641 113-380-015 71.96
0641 113-380-016 71.96
0641 113-380-017 71.96
0641 113-380-018 71.96
0641 113-380-019 71.96
0641 113-380-020 71.96
0641 113-380-021 71.96
0641 113-380-022 71.96
0641 113-380-023 71.96
0641 113-380-024 71.96
0641 113-380-025 71.96
0641 113-380-026 71.96
0641 113-380-027 71.96
0641 113-380-028 71.96
0641 113-380-029 71.96
0641 113-380-030 71.96
0641 113-380-031 71.96
0641 113-380-032 71.96
0641 113-380-033 71.96
0641 113-380-034 71.96
0641 113-380-035 71.96
0641 113-380-036 71.96
0641 113-380-037 71.96
0641 113-380-038 71.96
0641 113-380-039 71.96
0641 113-380-040 71.96
0641 113-380-041 71.96
0641 113-380-042 71.96
0641 113-380-043 71.96
0641 113-380-044 71.96
0641 113-380-045 71.96
0641 113-380-046 71.96
2 Fund Number Parcel Number Amount
0641 113-380-047 71.96
0641 113-380-048 71.96
0641 113-380-049 71.96
0641 113-380-050 71.96
0641 113-380-051 71.96
0641 113-380-052 71.96
0641 113-380-053 71.96
0641 113-380-054 71.96
0641 113-380-055 71.96
0641 113-380-056 71.96
0641 113-380-057 71.96
0641 113-380-058 71.96
0641 113-380-059 71.96
0641 113-380-060 71.96
0641 113-380-061 71.96
0641 113-380-062 71.96
0641 113-380-063 71.96
0641 113-380-064 71.96
0641 113-380-065 71.96
0641 113-380-066 71.96
0641 113-380-067 71.96
0641 113-380-068 71.96
0641 113-380-069 71.96
0641 113-380-070 71.96
0641 113-380-071 71.96
0641 113-390-001 71.96
0641 113-390-002 71.96
0641 113-390-003 71.96
0641 113-390-004 71.96
0641 113-390-005 71.96
0641 113-390-006 71.96
0641 113-390-007 71.96
0641 113-390-008 71.96
0641 113-390-009 71.96
0641 113-390-010 71.96
0641 113-390-011 71.96
0641 113-390-012 71.96
0641 113-390-013 71.96
0641 113-390-014 71.96
0641 113-390-015 71.96
0641 113-390-016 71.96
0641 113-390-017 71.96
0641 113-390-018 71.96
0641 113-390-019 71.96
0641 113-390-020 71.96
0641 113-390-021 71.96
3 Fund Number Parcel Number Amount
0641 113-390-022 71.96
0641 113-390-023 71.96
0641 113-390-024 71.96
0641 113-390-025 71.96
0641 113-390-026 71.96
0641 113-390-027 71.96
0641 113-390-028 71.96
0641 113-390-029 71.96
0641 113-390-030 71.96
0641 113-390-031 71.96
0641 113-390-032 71.96
0641 113-390-033 71.96
0641 113-390-034 71.96
0641 113-390-035 71.96
0641 113-390-036 71.96
0641 113-390-037 71.96
0641 113-390-038 71.96
0641 113-390-039 71.96
0641 113-390-040 71.96
0641 113-390-041 71.96
0641 113-390-042 71.96
0641 113-390-043 71.96
0641 113-390-044 71.96
0641 113-390-045 71.96
0641 113-390-046 71.96
0641 113-390-047 71.96
0641 113-390-048 71.96
0641 113-390-049 71.96
0641 113-390-050 71.96
0641 113-390-051 71.96
0641 113-390-052 71.96
0641 113-390-053 71.96
0641 113-390-054 71.96
0641 113-390-055 71.96
0641 113-390-056 71.96
0641 113-390-057 71.96
0641 113-390-058 71.96
0641 113-390-059 71.96
0641 113-390-060 71.96
0641 113-390-061 71.96
0641 113-390-062 71.96
0641 113-390-063 71.96
0641 113-400-003 71.96
0641 113-400-004 71.96
0641 113-400-005 71.96
0641 113-400-006 71.96
4 Fund Number Parcel Number Amount
0641 113-400-007 71.96
0641 113-400-008 71.96
0641 113-400-009 71.96
0641 113-400-010 71.96
0641 113-400-011 71.96
0641 113-400-012 71.96
0641 113-400-013 71.96
0641 113-400-014 71.96
0641 113-400-015 71.96
0641 113-400-016 71.96
0641 113-400-017 71.96
0641 113-400-018 71.96
0641 113-400-019 71.96
0641 113-400-020 71.96
0641 113-400-021 71.96
0641 113-400-022 71.96
0641 113-400-023 71.96
0641 113-400-024 71.96
0641 113-400-025 71.96
0641 113-400-026 71.96
0641 113-400-027 71.96
0641 113-400-028 71.96
0641 113-400-029 71.96
0641 113-400-030 71.96
0641 113-410-001 129.24
0641 113-410-002 129.24
0641 113-410-003 129.24
0641 113-410-004 129.24
0641 113-410-005 129.24
0641 113-410-006 129.24
0641 113-410-007 129.24
0641 113-410-008 129.24
0641 113-410-009 129.24
0641 113-410-010 129.24
0641 113-410-011 129.24
0641 113-410-012 129.24
0641 113-410-013 129.24
0641 113-410-014 129.24
0641 113-410-015 129.24
0641 113-410-016 129.24
0641 113-410-017 129.24
0641 113-410-018 129.24
0641 113-410-019 129.24
0641 113-410-020 129.24
0641 113-410-021 129.24
0641 113-410-022 129.24
5 Fund Number Parcel Number Amount
0641 113-410-023 129.24
0641 113-410-024 129.24
0641 113-410-025 129.24
0641 113-410-026 129.24
0641 113-410-027 129.24
0641 113-410-028 129.24
0641 113-410-029 129.24
0641 113-410-030 129.24
0641 113-410-031 129.24
0641 113-410-032 129.24
0641 113-410-033 129.24
0641 113-410-034 129.24
0641 113-410-035 129.24
0641 113-410-036 129.24
0641 113-410-037 129.24
0641 113-410-038 129.24
0641 113-410-039 129.24
0641 113-410-040 129.24
0641 113-410-041 129.24
0641 113-410-042 129.24
0641 113-410-043 129.24
0641 113-410-044 129.24
0641 113-410-045 129.24
0641 113-410-046 129.24
0641 113-410-047 129.24
0641 113-410-048 129.24
0641 113-410-049 129.24
0641 113-410-050 129.24
0641 113-420-001 71.96
0641 113-420-002 71.96
0641 113-420-003 71.96
0641 113-420-004 71.96
0641 113-420-005 71.96
0641 113-420-006 71.96
0641 113-420-007 71.96
0641 113-420-008 71.96
0641 113-420-009 71.96
0641 113-420-010 71.96
0641 113-420-011 71.96
0641 113-420-012 71.96
0641 113-420-013 71.96
0641 113-420-014 71.96
0641 113-420-015 71.96
0641 113-420-016 71.96
0641 113-420-017 71.96
0641 113-420-018 71.96
6 Fund Number Parcel Number Amount
0641 113-420-019 71.96
0641 113-420-020 71.96
0641 113-420-021 71.96
0641 113-430-001 71.96
0641 113-430-002 71.96
0641 113-430-003 71.96
0641 113-430-004 71.96
0641 113-430-005 71.96
0641 113-430-006 71.96
0641 113-430-007 71.96
0641 113-430-008 71.96
0641 113-430-009 71.96
0641 113-430-010 71.96
0641 113-430-011 71.96
0641 113-430-012 71.96
0641 113-430-013 71.96
0641 113-430-014 71.96
0641 113-430-015 71.96
0641 113-430-016 71.96
0641 113-430-017 71.96
0641 113-430-018 71.96
0641 113-430-019 71.96
0641 113-430-020 71.96
0641 113-430-021 71.96
0641 113-430-022 71.96
0641 113-430-023 71.96
0641 113-430-024 71.96
0641 113-430-025 71.96
0641 113-430-026 71.96
0641 113-430-027 71.96
0641 113-430-028 71.96
0641 113-430-029 71.96
0641 113-430-030 71.96
0641 113-430-031 71.96
0641 113-430-032 71.96
0641 113-440-001 71.96
0641 113-440-002 71.96
0641 113-440-003 71.96
0641 113-440-004 71.96
0641 113-440-005 71.96
0641 113-440-006 71.96
0641 113-440-007 71.96
0641 113-440-008 71.96
0641 113-440-009 71.96
0641 113-440-010 71.96
0641 113-440-011 71.96
7 Fund Number Parcel Number Amount
0641 113-440-012 71.96
0641 113-440-013 71.96
0641 113-440-014 71.96
0641 113-440-015 71.96
0641 113-440-016 71.96
0641 113-440-017 71.96
0641 113-440-018 71.96
0641 113-440-019 71.96
0641 113-440-020 71.96
0641 113-440-021 71.96
0641 113-440-022 71.96
0641 113-440-023 71.96
0641 113-440-024 71.96
0641 113-440-025 71.96
0641 113-440-026 71.96
0641 113-440-027 71.96
0641 113-440-028 71.96
0641 113-440-029 71.96
0641 113-440-030 71.96
0641 113-440-031 71.96
0641 113-440-032 71.96
0641 113-440-033 71.96
0641 113-440-034 71.96
0641 113-440-035 71.96
0641 113-440-036 71.96
0641 113-440-037 71.96
0641 113-440-038 71.96
0641 113-440-039 71.96
8