Agenda packet — Gustine City Council, August 19, 2025 (part 2 of 2)

City of Gustine

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2023
NOTE 4- DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS (continued)
F. Long-term Debt (continued)
Years Ended June 30 Principal Interest Total
2024 $ 16,000 $ 30,000 $ 46,000
2025 16,000 29,400 45,400
2026 17,000 28,781 45,781
2027 18,000 28,125 46,125
2028 18,000 27,450 45,450
2029 19,000 26,756 45,756
2030 20,000 26,025 46,025
2031 20,000 25,275 45,275
2032 21,000 24,506 45,506
2033 22,000 23,700 45,700
2034 23,000 22,856 45,856
2035 24,000 21,975 45,975
2036 25,000 21,056 46,056
2037 26,000 20,100 46,100
2038 27,000 19,106 46,106
2039 28,000 18,075 46,075
2040 29,000 17,006 46,006
2041 30,000 15,900 45,900
2042 31,000 14,756 45,756
2043 32,000 13,575 45,575
2044 33,000 12,356 45,356
2045 34,000 11,100 45,100
2046 36,000 9,787 45,787
2047 37,000 8,419 45,419
2048 38,000 7,013 45,013
2049 40,000 5,550 45,550
2050 41,000 4,031 45,031
2051 43,000 2,456 45,456
2052 44,000 825 44 825
Net long-term portion $ 808.,000 $ 515,960 $ 1,323.960
- 36-

Page 138 of 207 ends

NOTE 4-
City of Gustine

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2023
DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS (continued)
F. Long-term Debt (continued)
Business-type activities long-term debt
Notes/loans payable
2006 Sewer System Note Payable
On September 20, 2006, the City entered into a loan agreement with Citizens Business Bank in the amount of $1,154,500. The proceeds from this issue were used to refund a prior note payable that was used to finance sewer system improvements. The note has an interest rate of 4.95% and the final payment is scheduled for October 17, 2025. The annual debt service requirements for the business-type activity's payable outstanding at June 30, 2023, are as follows:

Years Ended June 30 Principal Interest Total
2024 $ 82,058 $ 9,536 $ 91,594
2025 86,171 5,424 91,595
2026 44 488 1 106 45 594
Total $ 212.717 $ 16,066 $s 228.783
2010 Vierra Loan Payable
In February 2010 the City entered a note payable in the amount of $350,000. The proceeds from the note were used to purchase property for the water and sewer enterprises. The note payable has an interest rate of 6.25% and the final payment is scheduled for January 2030. The note is being repaid with monthly payments of $2,558.

The annual debt service requirements for the note payable outstanding at June 30, 2023, are as follows:

Years Ended June 30 Principal Interest
2024 $ 20,959 $ 9,740
2025 22,307 8,392
2026 23,742 6,957
2027 25,269 5,430
2028 26,895 3,804
2029 28,624 2,074
2030 17 541 367
Total $ 165.,337 $ 36, 764
Total
$ 30,699
30,699
30,699
30,699
30,699
30,698
17 908
$ 202.101
2012 USDA Certificates of Participation- Water System Improvements On June 1, 2012, the City agreed to issue certificates of participation in the amount of $800,000.

The proceeds from this issue were used to finance improvements to the City's municipal water system. The certificates have an interest rate of 2.75% and the final payment is scheduled for July 1, 2052. The balance outstanding as of June 30, 2023 was $662,000. - 37-

Page 139 of 207 ends

NOTE 4-
City of Gustine

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2023
DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS (continued)
F. Long-term Debt (continued)
The annual debt service requirements for the water system improvement certificates of participation payable outstanding at June 30, 2023, are as follows:

Years Ended June 30
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049
2050
2051
2052
2053
Total
Principal
$ 15,000
15,000
16,000
16,000
16,000
17,000
17,000
17,000
18,000
18,000
18,000
19,000
19,000
19,000
20,000
20,000
21,000
21,000
22,000
22,000
27,000
28,000
28,000
29,000
29,000
30,000
30,000
31,000
32,000
32,000
$ 662,000
Interest
$ 17,999
17,586
17,160
16,720
16,280
15,826
15,359
14,891
14,410
13,915
13,420
12,911
12,389
11,866
11,330
10,780
10,216
9,639
9,048
8,443
7,679
7,013
6,243
5,459
4,661
3,850
3,025
2,186
1,320
440
$ 312.064
Total
$ 32,999
32,586
33,160
32,720
32,280
32,826
32,359
31,891
32,410
31,915
31,420
31,911
31,389
30,866
31,330
30,780
31,216
30,639
31,048
30,443
34,679
35,013
34,243
34,459
33,661
33,850
33,025
33,186
33,320

32.440
$ 974,064
Vac-Con Vacuum Truck & Rausch Minicam 360 Camera System Lease-purchase aqre_ement On April 25, 2020, the City agreed to lease-purchase a Vac-Con Vacuum Truck including a Rausch Minicam 360 Camera System. The terms of the lease include equipment costs of $468,621 and seven annual payments of $73,995 including an interest rate of 2.94%. The total payments at the end of the lease will total $517,966. The final lease payment is due 10/25/2026. - 38 -

Page 140 of 207 ends

NOTE 4-
City of Gustine

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2023
DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS (concluded)
F. Long-term Debt (concluded)
The annual debt service requirements for the Vac-Con Truck lease-purchase agreement payable outstanding at June 30, 2023, are as follows:

Interest Total
$ 8,100 $ 73,995
6,162 73,995
4,167 73,995

2.114 75.824
$ 20,543 $ 297.809
2022 CalPERS Prepayment Bond
On May 3, 2022, the City agreed to issue taxable revenue bonds in the amount of $2,353,711. The proceeds from this issue were used to prepay the city's pension liability. $152,000 was used to fund the cost of bond issuance. The remainder, $2,201,711 was paid to CalPERS reducing the pension liability. The bonds have an interest rate of 3.50% and the final payment is scheduled for April 1, 2042. The balance outstanding as of June 30, 2023 was $2,266,216.

The annual debt service requirements for the CalPers Prepayment Bond payable outstanding at June 30, 2023, are as follows:

Years Ended June 30 Principal Interest Total
2024 $ 85,981 $ 76,308 $ 162,289
2025 88,990 73,194 162,184
2026 92,105 69,970 162,075
2027 95,329 66,633 161,962
2028 98,665 63,180 161,845
2029 102,118 59,606 161,724
2030 105,693 55,907 161,600
2031 109,392 52,078 161,470
2032 113,220 48,115 161,335
2033 117,193 44,014 161,207
2034 121,285 39,769 161,054
2035 125,530 35,375 160,905
2036 129,923 30,828 160,751
2037 134,470 26,122 160,592
2038 139,177 21,250 160,427
2039 144,048 16,209 160,257
2040 149,090 10,991 160,081
2041 154,308 5,590 159,898
2042 159 709 159 709
Total $ 2,266.216 $ 795.139 $ 3.061,365
- 39-
Years Ended June 30 Principal
2024 $ 65,895
2025 67,833
2026 69,828
2027 73 710
Total $ 277,266

Page 141 of 207 ends

NOTE 5-
City of Gustine

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2023

PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM
General Information about the Pension Plan
Plan Description
The City contributes to the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), an agent multiple-employer public employee defined benefit pension plan. CalPERS acts as a common investment and administrative agent for participating public entities within the State of California.

Benefit provisions and all other requirements are established by state statute and City ordinance. A full description of the pension plan regarding number of employees covered, benefit provisions, assumptions (for funding, but not accounting purposes), and membership information are listed in the June 30, 2016 Annual Actuarial Valuation Report. This report and CalPERS' audited financial statements are publicly available reports that can be obtained at CalPERS' website under Forms and Publications.

Benefit Provided
CalPERS provides retirement and disability benefits, annual cost-of-living adjustments, and death benefits to plan members and beneficiaries. A classic miscellaneous member becomes eligible for Service Retirement upon attainment of age 55 with at least 5 years of credited service. PEPRA miscellaneous members become eligible for service retirement upon attainment of age 62 with at least 5 years of service. A classic safety member becomes eligible for Service Retirement upon attainment of age 50 with at least 5 years of credited service. PEPRA safety members become eligible for service retirement upon attainment of age 57 with at least 5 years of service. The service retirement benefit is a monthly allowance equal to the product of the benefit factor, years of service, and final compensation. The final compensation is the monthly average of the member's highest 36 or 12 consecutive months' full-time equivalent monthly pay. Retirement benefits for classic miscellaneous employees are calculated as 2.5% of the average final 36 months compensation.

Retirement benefits for PEPRA miscellaneous employees are calculated as 2.0% of the average final 36 months compensation.

Retirement benefits for classic safety employees are calculated as 3.0% of the average final 36 months compensation. Retirement benefits for PEPRA safety employees are calculated as 2.7% of the average final 36 months compensation.

Participant is eligible for non-industrial disability retirement if becomes disabled and has at least 5 years of credited service. There is no special age requirement. The standard non-industrial disability retirement benefit is a monthly allowance equal to 1.8 percent of final compensation, multiplied by service. Industrial disability benefits are not offered to miscellaneous employees. The City provides industrial disability retirement benefit to safety employees. The industrial disability retirement benefit is a monthly allowance equal to 50 percent of final compensation.

An employee's beneficiary may receive the basic death benefit if the employee dies while actively employed. The employee must be actively employed with the City to be eligible for this benefit. An employee's survivor who is eligible for any other pre-retirement death benefit may choose to receive that death benefit instead of this basic death benefit. The basic death benefit is a lump sum in the amount of the employee's accumulated contributions, where interest is currently credited at

7.5 percent per year, plus a lump sum in the amount of one month's salary for each completed year of current service, up to a maximum of six months' salary. For purposes of this benefit, one month's salary is defined as the member's average monthly full-time rate of compensation during the 12 months preceding death.

Benefit terms provide for annual cost-of-living adjustments to each employee's retirement allowance. Beginning the second calendar year after the year of retirement, retirement and survivor allowances will be annually adjusted on a compound basis by 2 percent. - 40-

Page 142 of 207 ends

NOTE 5-
City of Gustine

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2023
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM (continued)
Contributions
Section 20814(c) of the California Public Employees' Retirement Law ("PERL") requires that the employer contribution rates for all public employers be determined on an annual basis by the actuary and shall be effective on the July 1 following notice of a change in the rate. The total plan contributions are determined through CalPERS' annual actuarial valuation process. The actuarially determined rate is the estimated amount necessary to finance the costs of benefits earned by employees during the year, with an additional amount to finance any unfunded accrued liability. The employer is required to contribute the difference between the actuarially determined rate and the contribution rate of employees. Employer contribution rates may change as plan contracts are amended. It is the responsibility of the employer to make necessary accounting adjustments to reflect the impact due to any Employer Paid Member Contributions or situations where members are paying a portion of the employer contribution.

Also, on August 31, 2012, the California Legislature passed AB 340, the Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA). As part of this reform, "new members" hired starting January 1, 2013 will have to pay their required employee contribution. Since their benefit level is much lower than the "classic members" their contribution rate is also lower. PEPRA defines "new member" as an employee hired on or after January 1, 2013 who falls into one of the following:

1. Has no prior membership in any California public retirement system.

2. Has prior membership with another California public retirement system that has no reciprocity with CalPERS; or

3. Has an established membership with CalPERS prior to January 1, 2013, and is re-hired by a different CalPERS employer after a break in service of greater than six months.

For the measurement date year ended June 30, 2023, the plan's contribution and the proportionate share of aggregate employer contributions of the cost-sharing plan made for each plan was as follows:

Total
Contributions - employer $322,964
Pension Liabilities. Pension Expenses and Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions
As of June 30, 2023, the City reported net pension liabilities for its proportionate share for each plan as follows:

Total
Proportionate share of net pension liability $1,797,492 The City's net pension liability for each plan is measured as the proportionate share of the net pension liability.

The net pension liability of the Plans is measured as of June 30, 2022, and the total pension liability for each Plan used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of June 30, 2021 rolled forward to June 30, 2022 using standard update procedures. The City's proportion of the net pension liability was based on a projection of the City's long-term share of contributions to the pension plans relative to the projected contributions of all participating employers, actuarially determined.

The following is the approach established by the plan actuary to allocate the net pension liability and pension expense to the individual employers within the risk pool. - 41-

Page 143 of 207 ends

NOTE 5-
City of Gustine

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2023
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM (continued)
(1) In determining a cost-sharing plan's proportionate share, total amounts of liabilities and assets are first calculated for the risk pool as a whole on the valuation date (June 30, 2021). The risk pool's fiduciary net position ("FNP") subtracted from its total pension liability ("TPL") determines the net pension liability ("NPL") at the valuation date. (2) Using standard actuarial roll forward methods, the risk pool TPL is then computed at the measurement date (June 30, 2022). The risk pool FNP at the measurement date is then subtracted from this number to compute the NPL for the risk pool at the measurement date.

For purposes of FNP in this step and any later reference thereto, the risk pool's FNP at the measurement date denotes the aggregate risk pool's FNP at June 30, 2022 less the sum of all additional side fund (or unfunded liability) contributions made by all employers during the measurement period (fiscal year 2021 ).
(3) The individual plan's TPL, FNP and NPL are also calculated at the valuation date. (4) Two ratios are created by dividing the plan's individual TPL and FNP as of the valuation date from by the amounts in step (1) the risk pool's total TPL and FNP, respectively. (5) The plan's TPL as of the Measurement Date is equal to the risk pool TPL generated in (2) multiplied by the TPL ratio generated in (4). The plan's FNP as of the Measurement Date is equal to the FNP generated in (2) multiplied by the FNP ratio generated in (4) plus any additional side fund (or unfunded liability) contributions made by the employer on behalf of the plan during the measurement period.
6) The plan's NPL at the Measurement Date is the difference between the TPL and FNP calculated in (5).

The City's proportionate share of the net pension liability for each plan as of June 30, 2022 was as follows:

All Plans
Proportion June 30, 2022
Proportion June 30, 2021
Change

0.01556%

0.03879%
(0.02323)%
For the measurement year ended June 30, 2022, the City recognized pension expense of $1,148,305. On June 30, 2023 the City reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources:

Deferred Deferred
Outflows of Inflows of
Resources Resources
Pension contributions after measurement date $ 322,964 $ Differences between actual and expected experience 57,142 (21,618) Changes in assumptions 182,570
Change in employer proportion 5,604 (2,032,663)
Net difference between projected and actual earnings 304,302 Differences between actual contributions and
proportionate share of contributions 1,430,312 (15,969) Total $ 2,302,894 $ (2,070,250)
- 42-

Page 144 of 207 ends

NOTE 5-
City of Gustine

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2023
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM (continued)
The $322,964 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to contributions after the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the year ended June 30, 2024
Other amounts reported as deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized as pension expense as follows:

Year Ended June 30
2024
2025
2026
2027
$ (83,328)
(105,970)
(86,892)
185,871
Actuarial Assumptions - The June 30, 2021, valuation was rolled forward to determine the June 30, 2022 total pension liabilities based on the following actuarial methods and assumptions:

Valuation Date
Measurement Date
Actuarial Cost Method
Actuarial Assumptions:

Discount Rate
Inflation
Salary Increases
Mortality Rate Table
Post Retirement Benefit Increase
June 30, 2021
June 30, 2022
Entry-Age Normal Cost Method

6.9%

2.3%
Varies by Entry Age and Service
Derived using CalPERS membership data for all funds
Contract COLA up to 2.3% until purchasing power
Protection allowance floor on power applies
The mortality table used was developed based on CalPERS' specific data. Generational Mortality to capture ongoing mortality improvement using 80% of Scale MP 2020 published by the Society of Actuaries. For more details, please refer to the 2021 experience study report that can be found on the CalPERS website.

Discount Rate - The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 6.90%. The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that contributions from plan members will be made at the current member contribution rates and that contributions from employers will be made at statutorily required rates, actuarially determined. Based on those assumptions, the Plan's fiduciary net position was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of current plan members. Therefore, the long-term expected rate of return on plan investments was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total pension liability.

Long-term Expected Rate of Return - The long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was determined using a building-block method in which expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of pension plan investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset class.

In determining the expected long-term rate of return, CalPERS considered both short-term and long-term market return expectations as well as the expected pension fund (PERF) cash flows.

Using historical returns of all funds' asset classes, expected compound (geometric) returns were calculated over the short-term (first 10 years) and the long-term (11 + years) using a building-block approach. Using the expected nominal returns for both short-term and long-term, the present value of benefits was calculated for each fund.
- 43-

Page 145 of 207 ends

NOTE 5-
City of Gustine

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2023
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM (concluded)
The expected rate of return was set by calculating the rounded single equivalent expected return that arrived at the same present value of benefits of cash flows as the one calculated using both short-term and long-term returns.

The expected rate of return was then set equivalent to the single equivalent rate calculated above and adjusted to account for assumed administrative expenses. The expected real rates of return by asset class are as follows:

Asset Class Assumed Asset Allocation Real Return Years 1-10 12 Global equity - cap-weighted 30.00% 4.45%
Global equity -- non-cap-weighted 12.00% 3.84%
Private Equity 13.00% 7.28%
Treasury 5.00% 0.27%
Mortgage-backed Securities 5.00% 0.50%
Investment Grade Corporates 10.00% 1.56%
High Yield 5.00% 2.27%
Emerging Market Debt 5.00% 2.48%
Private Debt 5.00% 3.57%
Real assets 15.00% 3.21%
Leverage -5.00% -0.59%

1. An expected inflation of 2.30% used for this period.

2. Figures are based on the 2021-22 Asset Liability Management study.

Sensitivity of the Net Pension Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate The following presents the City's proportionate share of the net position liability for the Plan, calculated using the discount rate for each Plan, as well as what the City's proportionate share of the net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1-percentage point lower or 1-percentage point higher than the current rate:

All Plan's Net Pension Liability /(Asset)
Discount Rate - 1% Current Discount Rate
(5.90%) (6.90%)
$ 3,578,415 $ 1,797,492
Discount Rate + 1%
(7.90%)
$ 337,539
The expected average remaining service lifetime (EARSL) is calculated by dividing the total future service years by the total number of plan participants (active, inactive, and retired) in the Public Agency Cost-Sharing Multiple-Employer Plan (PERF C).

The EARSL for PERF C for the measurement period ending June 30, 2023, is 3.8 years, which was obtained by dividing the total service years of 600,538 (the sum of remaining service lifetimes of the active employees) by 160,073 (the total number of participants: active, inactive, and retired) in PERF C. Inactive employees and retirees have remaining service lifetimes equal to 0. Total future service is based on the members' probability of decrementing due to an event other than receiving a cash refund.

Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position
Detailed information about the Plans' fiduciary net position is available in the separately issued CalPERS financial report.
- 44-

Page 146 of 207 ends

NOTE 6-
NOTE 7-
NOTE 8-
City of Gustine

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2023

OTHER INFORMATION
A. Self-Insurance
The City participates with other public entities in a joint venture under a joint powers agreement which establishes the Central San Joaquin Valley Risk Management Authority (CSJVRMA). The relationship between the City and CSJVRMA is not a component unit of the City for financial reporting purposes.

The City is covered for the first $1,000,000 of each general liability claim and $250,000 of each worker's compensation claim through the CSJVRMA. The City has the right to receive dividends or the obligation to pay assessments based on a formula which, among other expenses, charges the City's account for liability losses under $10,000 and workers' compensation losses under $10,000.

The CSJVRMA participates in an excess pool, which provides general liability coverage from $1,000,000 to $10,000,000. The CSJVRMA participates in an excess pool, which provides Worker's Compensation coverage from $250,000 to $500,000 and purchases excess insurance above the $500,000 to the statutory limit.

The CSJVRMA is a consortium of fifty-four (54) cities in San Joaquin Valley, California. It was established under provisions of California Government Code Section 6500 et seq. The CSJVRMA is governed by a Board of Directors, which meets three to four times per year, consisting of one member appointed by each member city. The day-to-day business is handled by a management group employed by the CSJVRMA. The annual financial report may be obtained from the consortium's executive office at 6371 Auburn Blvd., Citrus Heights, California 95621.

B. Contingent Liabilities
The City participates in a few federal, state and local grant programs. These programs are subject to financial and compliance audits by the grantors or their representatives. The audits of these programs for earlier years and the year ended June 30, 2023 have not been completed in all cases; accordingly, final determination of the City's compliance with applicable grant requirements may be established at some future date. The amount, if there is any, of expenditures which may be disallowed by the granting agencies cannot be determined at this time. The City believes any such claims would be immaterial to the City's financial position on June 30, 2023. Receipt of these grant revenues is not assured in the future.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On October 1, 2019, the City entered into a loan agreement with the California Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission in the amount of $2,249,604. The proceeds of the loan are to finance various energy efficiency projects. The loan had not been funded as of June 30, 2023. The first payment is due December 2024.

PRIOR PERIOD ADJUSTMENT
The prior period adjustment was to record the issuance of CalPERS Taxable Revenue Bond dated May 2022 for $2,353,711 as disclosed in Note 4F.
- 45-

Page 147 of 207 ends

REQUIRED

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Page 148 of 207 ends

City of Gustine

SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND

CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES-BUDGET AND ACTUAL

GENERAL FUND
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Variance
Original Final over/(under)
Budget Budget Actual budget

REVENUES
Property taxes $ 663,370 $ 663,370 $ 845,563 $ 182,193
Sales taxes 675,000 675,000 1,006,253 331,253
Business licenses/franchise fee 122,750 122,750 504,116 381,366 Other taxes 448,800 448,800 119,209 (329,591)
Licenses and permits 106,420 106,420 455,700 349,280
Fines and forfeitures 11,500 11,500 16,398 4,898
Use of money and property 106,465 106,465 120,996 14,531 From other agencies 281,000 281,000 315,858 34,858
Charges for services 116,240 116,240 34,683 (81,557)
Other revenue 29,000 29,000 108,533 79,533
Total revenue 2,560,545 2,560,545 3,527,309 966,764

EXPENDITURES
General government 432,598 432,598 597,706 (165,108)
Public safety 1,529,672 1,529,672 1,540,192 (10,520)
Community development 195,368 195,368 400,927 (205,559) Cultural and recreation 346,190 346,190 245,438 100,752 Debt service:

Principal 24,490 92,495 (92,495)
Interest 18,302 84,827 (84,827)
Total expenditures 2,546,620 2,503,828 2,961,585 (457,757) Excess (deficiency) of revenues
over (under) expenditures
13,925 56,717 565,724 509,007

OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers in 137,078 134,000 134,000
Transfers out 139,787 139,787 (47,576) (187.363)
Total other financing sources (uses) 276,865 139,787 86,424 (53,363) Net changes in fund balances $ 290,790 $ 196,504 652,148 $ 455,644 Fund balances-beginning 908,063
Fund balances-ending $ 1,560,211
- 46-

Page 149 of 207 ends

City of Gustine

SCHEDULE OF THE CITY'S PROPORTIONATE
SHARE OF THE NET PENSION LIABILITY (ASSET}
June 30, 2023
Fiscal Year End 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 Measurement Date, June 30 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 Proportion of the net pension liability 0.01556% 0.03879% 0.03119% 0.03095% 0.03089% 0.03056% 0.03006% 0.03016% 0.03112% Proportion share of the net pension liability $ 1,797,492 $ 2,097,883 $ 3,393,913 $ 3,171,441 $ 2,976,827 $ 3,030,661 $ 2,684,397 $ 2,189,560 $ 1,977,851 Covered - employee payroll $ 1,682,595 $ 1,543,463 $ 1,367,146 $ 1,175,247 $ 815,433 $ 1,054,390 $ 1,054,690 $ 1,012,431 $ 1,216,497 Proportionate share of the net pension liability
as percentage of covered-employee payroll 106.83% 135.92% 248.25% 269.85% 365.06% 287.35% 254.52% 216.27% 162.59% Plan fiduciary net position as a percentage
of the total pension liability 76.68% 88.29% 75.10% 75.26% 75.26% 73.31% 263.53% 340.16% 364.39% Notes to Schedule:

Changes of Assumptions: There were no changes of assumptions. -47-

Page 150 of 207 ends

City of Gustine

SCHEDULE OF CONTRIBUTIONS
June 30, 2023
Fiscal Year End 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 Contractually required contribution
(actuarially determined) $ 322,964 $ 427,512 $ 460,471 $ 407,405 $ 341,654 $ 308,533 $ 308,533 $ 289,970 $ 257,804 $ 243,107 Contributions in relation to the actuarially
determined contributions (322,964) (2,629,223) (460,471) (407,405) (341,654) (308,533) (308,533) (289,970) (257,804) (243,107) Contribution deficiency (excess) $ $(2.201,711 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Covered - employee payroll* $ 1,676,328 $ 1,682,595 $ 1,543,463 $ 1,367,146 $ 1,175,247 $ 815,433 $ 815,433 $ 1,054,690 $ 1,012,431 $ 1,216,497 Contributions as a percentage of covered-employee payroll 19.27% 156.26% 29.83% 29.80% 29.07% 37.84% 37.84% 27.49% 25.46% 19.98% Notes to Schedule: Benefit Changes: There were no changes to benefit terms that applied to all members of the Public Agency Pool. Changes of Assumptions: There were no changes of assumptions. -48-

Page 151 of 207 ends

OTHER

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Page 152 of 207 ends

City of Gustine

COMBINING BALANCE SHEETS

NON-MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
June 30, 2023
Gas Tax Trans- Separate
portalion Impact
Sidewalk Fees Sub
Maintenance Citywide Re- Borrelli Southport Total Sub Total COPS General Community Sub Total Swimming Lighting 8 Traffic & development Asmt Asmt (See page Non-Major Utility_Tax SLESF Public Safely Capital Imp COBG Center (See page 51 Pool Landscaping Safety Recreation CMAQ Housing District District 53) Measure V SRF ASSETS
Cash and investments 261,256 80,372 39,690 148,831 222,678 $ 1,643,270 $ 94,040 59,123 $ 232,654 $ 26,292 $ 33,352 $1,294,001 624,514 $4,760,073 Cash with agents-restricted Receivables 26,596 23,769 282 53,728 104,375 Due trom other funds 310,545 310,545 Long-term note receivable 48.333 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 48,333 Total assets S84$730 $ 80,372 $ 39,690 $ 148,831 1_22267s _$ ___ $ 1,667,039 ? • 94.040
± 5a405 _s ___ $ 232,654 s ___ $ 26,292 $ 33,352 $ 1,294,0o s_5rs.242 $ 5,223,326 LIABILITIES ANO FUND BALANCES Labhties
Accounts payable 4 928 $ $ 998 4,727 4,879 $ 548 4,594 4,287 248 792 26,002 Due lo other governments Due lo other funds 24,269 1,823 44,037 91 70,220 Deposit and other habrhties Unearned revenue ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- - ---- ---- ---- ---- Tolat hath1fies -4928 - ---- ---- 25.267 ____ 1 6,550 -4,879 518 48,631 4287 91 248 ---- 792 95,222 Fund balances:

Restricted 641,802 80,372 39,690 148,831 222,678 1,667,038 89,161 58,857 228,367 26,044 33,352 1,294,001 677,450 5,207,643 Unassigned (deficit) --- ---- (25287 (6.550) ---- (48.639 - (91 Total fund balances ---- ---- - (80.539) -e41.802 80,372 39.690 148,831 222,678 -(25,287) 1,667,038 (6,550) 89.161 58,857 (48,630 228 ,367 (91 28,044 33,352 1 294.001 677,450 5,127 104 Total liabilities and fund balances s 646,730 80.372 $ 39,690 $ 148,831 $ 222,678 $ ___ • $1,667,039 _$ ___ - $ 94,040 59405 _$ ___ $ 232.654 _$ ___ 5 26.282 $ 33,352 $1,294,001 $ 678,242 552243.326 - 49-

Page 153 of 207 ends

City of Gustine

COMBINING BALANCE SHEETS

NON-MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
June 30, 2023
Pioneer Park
Rohabllltation
American Grant Sub Total Total
Rescue Plan Impact CAL VIP Non-Major Non-Major
-(ARPA) fees Gran! SRE SRF_
Tobacco
Granl
Cannabis PAL Active
Swimming Communnly Insurance Abandoned Explorers PD Recycling Transportation Pool capital_Fire services Conuou!es f1es Solsgen Is! Vehicle Programs coPs Grant Revenue Solar Project Plan Per Capita
Grant
104,375 104,375
310,545 310,545 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 48333 -48.333 4,175 723vs $ 40,000 5 739€ $ 56,428 ssr + 4ss4 $ 23,443 - 158

20.4s3 $ 93.033
• 2904
$ ___ 5 1206,526 _$ ___ $ ___ $ 5,223,326 $ 6,814,447
$ 55 $ $ $ s s $ . $ $ $ $ $ $ 10,706 26,002 36,763

36.278 97,887 46,657 59,503 70.220 310,545
6,537 6.537

36.333 --- - ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- - --- ---- ---- ---- ---- 6.537 97.897 46.667 70.209 96.222 353,845 ASSETS
Cash and investments Casi wlh agents-reslnrcled
Recewables Due from oller funds Long-lerm note receivable Total assets

LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES
Labilities
Accounts payable
Due to other governments Due to other funds
Deposit an other habit+es Unearned revenue
Total liabilities
$ 4,175 $ 72,316 $ 40,000 7,996 56,428 6,537 45,614 23,443 $ 1,686 30,463 93,033 2,904 $ 1,206,526 $ $ 4,760,073 6,351,194 Fund balances
Resiniclea 4,175 72.316 40,000 7,996 56,428 45,614 23,443 1,686 30,463 93.033 2,904 1,206,526 5,207,643 6,792,227 Unassigned (elicit) (36,333) --- ---- ---- ---- ---- �____ - (48.657 (70.209) (80539) (331.625) Total fund balances (36,333) . 4,175 --712316 40.000 7996 56.428 ---- - 45.614

23.443 1686 30463 -93,033 2904 (97,887) 1,206.526 (46,657) (70.209) 5,127,104 6,460,602 Tolat hrabhties and fund balances $ s.417s 5 7231s $ 40,000 799% $ 56,428 ± 9537 $ 45,614 $ 23443 5 188% $ 30,463 $ 93,033 + 2904 _$ ___ - $ 1206,526 $ ___ s ____ $ 524332¢ $ 6,814,447 - 50-

Page 154 of 207 ends

City of Gustine

COMBINING SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES

NON-MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Gas Tax
Separate Transporlafion lmpacl
Sidewalk Fees Sub Sub Total
Mainlenance Citywide Re- Borrelli Soulhporl Tolal Non-Major COPS General Community Sub Tolal Swimming Lighting & Traffic & development Asmt Asmt (See page Special Utility Tax SLESF Public Safety Capital Impr CDBG Center (See pago 52) Pool Landscaping Safety Recrealion CMAO Housing District District 54) Measure V Revenue

REVENUES
Properly laxes s $ $ $ $ $ $ $ s $ s s 5 $ s
Sales laxes OIher taxes 373,402 373,402
Business licenses/franchise fee Licenses and permits 5,760 5,760 Fines and forfeitures 2,855 2,855 Use of money and properly 111 111 Intergovernmental 371,577 76,431 303,520 751,528
Charges for services 12,879 31,484 70,903 45,949 59,053 2,014 15 222,297 Other revenue 3250 ---- ---- ---- ---- ? 6.175 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 9.450 Total revenue 376,652 12,904 377,337 37,659 71014 2,855 -45,949 76431 59,053 2014 15 303,520 1,365,403

EXPENDITURES
Current
General government 101 101 Public Safety 4,231 204 4,435 Transportation 61,916 92,584 5,170 998 404 161,072 Community development Cultural and recrealion 38,752 59,028 167,077 195,618 141,086 102 601,663 Debl service
Principal Interest
Capital outlays ---- ---- ---- ---- - ---- 4,199 ---- ---- 175,407 179,606 Total expenditures 38,752 ---- 59.028 -61,916 167.077 195,818 -4231 141,086 96,783 5170 998 -811 175,407 946,877 excess [ueircvency) oI revenues over (under) expenditures 337.900 ---- ---- ---- ---- (48,124 315.421 -(1294189) (124,600) (1378) (95.137) (20,352) 53,883 -1,016 (796) 128,113 418,526

OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)
Transfers in 37,376 137,078 66,968 241,422
Transfers out (241,422) ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- - (4715---- ---- ---- ---- ---- (246137) Total other hunancing sources (uses) (241,422) ---- ---- 37,376 132,363 66,968 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- (4,715) Net changes in fund balances 96.478 (8,748) 315,421 2,945 (124,604) (1,376) (28,169) (20,352) 53,883 1,016 (796) 128,113 413,811 Fund balances-beginning 545,324 80,372 39.890 148.831 222,678 -(16.519 1,351,617 (9,495) 213,765 60,233 (20,462) 248.719 (9D (27.839) 32,336 1,294,797 549,337 4,713,293 Fund balances-ending $ 641,802 80,372 $ 39,690 $ 148.831 $ 222,678 $ (25,267) $1,667,038 $ (65650 89.181 $ 58,857 $ (48,631) $ 228,367 S (91 $ 26.044 s 33a382 51.294.001 $ 677,450 $5.121.10% - 51-

Page 155 of 207 ends

City of Gustine

COMBINING SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES

NON-MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
For the Year Ended June 30, 2023
Pioneer Park
Rehabilitation Sub Total Total
Cannabis PAL Active American Grant Non-Major Non-Major
-
Per Capita Swimming Community Insurance Abandoned Explorers PD Recycling Transporlalio Tobacco Rescue Plan mpact CAL VIP Special Special 9a! Poot cape! fie Services Con!ioues_Frewors Solisgen_Imus eiele Programs COPS Grant_Revenue_ soar Project n Plan Grant (ARPA Fees Grant Revenue Revenue

REVENUES
Properly laxes $ $ $ $ $ $ s s s
Sales laxes Other laxes 373,402 373,402
Business licenses/franchise fee Licenses and perm1ls 5,760 5,760 Fies and lorleitures 2,855 2,855 Use ol money and properly 111 111 Intergovernmental 2,142 1,686 20,000 57,494 703,550 751,528 1,536,400 Charges for services 222,297 222,297
Other revenue
- ---- ---- 40,000 24.378 ---- ---- ---- 3314 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- 9450 77.142 Tolal revenue ---- ---- --- 40.000 24378 ---- ---- 2.142 -331± 1.886 20,000 ---- ---- -57.494 703.550 ---- ---- 1_365,403 2,217,967 EXPENDITURES Current
Garerat government 24,535 101 24,636 Public Safety 938 99,254 4,435 104,627 Transportation 161.072 161,072
Communly development
Cultural and recreation 27,767 601,663 629.430
Debt servce
Principal ln1eresl
Caprlal outlays $ ---- ---- --- ---- ---- ---- ---- --- ---- ---- ---- ---- 94.880 179,606 -274.785 Total expenditures 88 ---- 27.787 --- ---- 83° ---- - - 8925% - 24,535

94.680 946,877 1,194,550
Excess (elctency] ot revenues ---- ----
over (under) expenditures (499) -" 40.,000 �---- 2,142 2376 1886 20.000 ---- (41750) 703,550 -(24.535) (94.680) 418.526 1,023,417 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Transfers in 241,422 241,422 Translers out --- --- ---- - - ---- - - ---- --- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --- -(246.130 (246.137 ----- -------- Tolal other hnancing sources (uses) --- - - ---- ---- ---- --- ---- ---- --- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- (4.715) (4.715) -------- Net changes m fund balances (499) 40,000 (3,389) 2,142 2,376 1,686 20,000 (41,760) 703,550 (24,535) (94,680) 413,811 1,018,702 Fund balances-beginning (589) 4.175 7231% 11.385 58.428 43.472 21067 10.483 - 93.033

2.904 (56.127) 502,976 (22,12) 24471 4,713.293 5,441,900 Fund balances-ending ·_196333) % 4175 $ 72316 $ 40,000 5 199g $ 56,428 s ___ - $ 45,614 $ 23.443 + 1886 $ 30,463 930a43 • 2904
$ (97.887) $ 1.206.526 s (46657) $ (70_209) $ 5.127.104 $ 6,460.602 - 52-

Page 156 of 207 ends

ITEM NO. 15

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
AUGUST 19, 2025
PREPARED BY: Mario Gouveia, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gustine Accepting Bid and Awarding a Construction Contract to United Pavement Maintenance, Inc. for the Construction of North Avenue Pump Station Improvements and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement
STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS: 5. Robust Infrastructure

BACKGROUND
The City of Gustine (City) owns and operates a sanitary sewer lift station (SSLS) on North Avenue near the Borrelli subdivision. The SSLS has reached its useful life and has failed numerous times in the recent past. The SSLS is slated for rehabilitation and the City budgeted for its replacement in FY2022. In order to address operation failures, the City recently purchased a diesel-powered Gorman-Rupp portable pump to keep the SSLS in service during the times when the permanent pumps fail and are repaired.

The City wishes to upgrade the SSLS to a skid mounted Gorman-Rupp unit and standardize its equipment moving forward. At the December 6, 2022 Council meeting, staff requested Council approve a sole source purchase from Gorman-Rupp for the SSLS skid. The Gorman-Rupp supplier informed the City it would take near one year for delivery of a SSLS skid once it is ordered. Council authorized the sole-source purchase of the SSLS skid in order to reduce or eliminate waiting for the equipment once the project is bid and help avoid construction delays.

The City has received the SSLS skid and the North Avenue Sewer Lift Station Repairs was advertised for construction.

The project consists of constructing a 12" sewer line, new sewer manhole, the installation of an owner furnished sewer pump station, and miscellaneous site improvements along North Avenue between Linden Avenue and Via Jodi.

ANALYSIS/DISCUSSION
Following a public bidding process, the City received a total of two (2) bids that were opened and read aloud at 2:00 p.m. on July 23. 2025. this being the advertised bid opening date and time. The lowest responsive and responsible bid was submitted by United Pavement Maintenance, Inc. in the amount of three hundred twenty-eight thousand nine hundred seven dollars and fifteen cents ($328,907.15). The bid results were as listed:

CONTRACTOR
United Pavement Maintenance, Inc. $

TOTAL BID
328,907.15

Page 157 of 207 ends

Taylor Backhoe Service, Inc. dba TBS
Contractors
Engineers Estimate
$
$
330,120.05
318,495.00

COMMUNITY OUTREACH
The project was advertised in the Gustine Standard on June 25, 2025, July 2, 2025, and July 9, 2025.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City of Gustine Environmental Quality Guidelines, an Initial Study was prepared to identify and assess potential environmental impacts as a result of this project. Through the Initial Study, staff determined that the project would not result in any significant adverse effects and the project can be categorically exempt pursuant to pursuant to Section 15301 (b), Existing Facility. The project involves repairing and rehabilitating existing sewer lift station that will result in negligible or no expansion of use.

FISCAL IMPACT
The project is funded by the City Sewer Fund (061) for $250,000 under capital project No. 25SW0002. Based on the bid result, staff recommends that City Council appropriate an additional $111,800.00 in the Sewer Fund (061) for this work. Currently, this fund is operating at a surplus of $400,000 for FY2025-2026 and has sufficient fund balance to cover this expense.

STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
This item correlates to Strategic Plan Goal #5 - Robust Infrastructure, as the purpose of the repairs to the Sanitary Sewer Lift Station is to move wastewater from one location to another, usually from lower to higher ground, ensuring it flows through the system toward a wastewater treatment facility.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a Resolution:
l. Accepting bid and awarding a construction contract to United Pavement Maintenance, Inc. for the construction of North Avenue Pump Station Improvements and authorizing the City Manager to execute the Agreement and any associated change orders up to ten percent ( 10%) of the construction contract on behalf of the City of Gustine.

2. Amend the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 and appropriate an additional $111,8000.00 in the Sewer Fund (061) for the construction of this project.

EXHIBIT(S)
A) Resolution
B) Abstract of Bids
APPROVED BY:
-I J
Soknirorn Than, City Manager

Page 158 of 207 ends

RESOLUTION 2025-XXXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GUSTINE ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO UNITED PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE, INC.

FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NORTH AVENUE PUMP STATION IMPROVEMENTS AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, The Sanitary Sewer Lift Statin on North Avenue has reached its useful life and is in need of rehabilitation; and
WHEREAS, on December 6, 2022 Council approved a sole source purchase from Gorman-Rupp for the Sanitary Sewer Lift Station skid; and WHEREAS, the Invitation to bid for the construction of the North Avenue Pump Station Improvements was advertised in the Gustine Press Standard on June 25, 2025, July 2, 2025, and July 9, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the major work consists of constructing a 12" sewer line, new sewer manhole, the installation of an owner furnished sewer pump station, and miscellaneous improvements along North Avenue between Linden Avenue and Via Jodi; and WHEREAS, a total of two (2) bids were received and read aloud at 2:00p.m. on July 23, 2025 at the City of Gustine City Hall, this being the advertised bid opening date and time; and
WHEREAS, the bid results were as listed below; and

CONTRACTOR
United Pavement Maintenance, Inc.

Taylor Backhoe Services, Inc. dba TBS
Contractors
$
$

TOTAL BID
328,907.15
330,120.05
WHEREAS, the Engineer's Estimate was $318,495.00; and
WHEREAS, the bids have been reviewed by the City Engineer and United Pavement Maintenance, Inc. submitted the lowest responsive and responsible bid; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Gustine accepts the bid from United Pavement Maintenance, Inc. and now desires to enter into an agreement to construct the project.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Gustine:

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated by reference.

Section 2. The City Council does hereby accept the bid of United Pavement Maintenance, Inc., as noted above, and finds that United Pavement Maintenance, Inc., is the lowest responsive and responsible bidder.

Section 3. The City Council further awards the construction contract to United Pavement Maintenance, Inc., in the total bid amount of three hundred twenty-eight thousand nine hundred seven dollars and fifteen cents ($328,907.15) and authorizes the City Manager

Page 159 of 207 ends

to execute an agreement with United Pavement Maintenance, Inc. for the construction of the North Avenue Pump Station Improvements project.

Section 4. The City Council does hereby amend the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 and appropriate an additional $111,800.00 in the Sewer Fund (061) for the construction of this project.

Section 5. This Resolution will become effective upon adoption.

THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Gustine was passed by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 19 day of August, 2025, and the resolution was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:

Patrick Nagy, Mayor
City of Gustine
ATTEST:

Melanie Correa, City Clerk
City of Gustine

Page 160 of 207 ends

ABSTRACT OF BIDS FOR

CITY OF GUSTINE
North Avenue Pump Station Improvements
Bid Opening: July 23, 2025 @ 2:00 p.m.

Taylor Backhoe Service Inc dba TBS
United Pavement Maintenance, Inc. Contractors
Engineer's Estimate 2907 Tully Road 1605 E. Gerard Avenue Hughson. CA 95326 Merced, CA 95341
Item Quantity
No. Item Description and Unit Unit Price Amount Unit Price Amount Unit Price Amount I Mobilization I LS 12,000.00 12.000.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 I 1,875.00 11,875.00 2 Traffic Control 1 LS 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 3 Furnish and Install 12 Inch Sewer Line 348 LF 200.00 69,600.00 123.05 42,821.40 264.33 91,986.84 4 Furnish and Install 4 Inch C-900 Sewer Force
Main Line 55 LF 120.00 6,600.00 533.85 29,361.75 147.53 8,114.15 5 Construct Sewer Manhole I EA 6,500.00 6,500.00 9,600.00 9,600.00 11,336.24 11,336.24 6 Furnish and Install Residential Water Service I EA 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,550.00 2,550.00 10,069.38 10,069.38 7 Construct Sidewalk 96 SF 20.00 1,920.00 105.00 10,080.00 37.47 3,597.12 8 Construct Curb and Gutter 23 LF 125.00 2,875.00 250.00 5,750.00 293.80 6,757.40 9 Construct Residential Driveway I EA 6,500.00 6,500.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 13,077.50 13,077.50 10 Construct Pump Station Site Improvements I LS 205,000.00 205,000.00 196,744.00 196,744.00 168,306.42 168,306.42 BID TOTAL $318,495.00 $328,907.15 $330,120.05
Subcontractors Listed: Golden Bay Fence plus Iron Works, Inc American Elite Electric Inc.

Rain for Rent Womack Striping Inc.

H&R Plumbing & Drain Cleaning Inc. Rolfe Construction Inc. 930.08

Page 161 of 207 ends

ITEM NO. 16

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
AUGUST 19, 2025
PREPARED BY: Jami Westervelt, Economic and Community Development Director SUBJECT: Airport Hangar Demolition Contract
STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL: 2. Community-Based Development

BACKGROUND
The City of Gustine owns fifteen permanent hangars at the Gustine Airport and is responsible for maintaining them. While the Airport Commission and the City Council have expressed a strong desire to improve upon the City-owned hangars, funding has hampered efforts.

The condition has significantly deteriorated beyond that presented to the Council in 2021, when Council last considered hangar repairs that included eight of the hangars discussed herein. The $622,535 estimated to repair structures and doors was not feasible to complete due to lack of funding.

City Airport, Public Works, Building and Engineering departments recently re-evaluated existing City-owned hangars and determined nine are now in an advanced state of disrepair, necessitating demolition. They are all past useful life with weathered wood frames and walls mostly made of a lightweight sheet metal that peels apart once significant wind loosens nails and screws.

As hangar rentals generate revenue, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has not historically funded hangars from its Airport Capital Improvement Program (ACIP).

Recently, the FAA has stated it will allow for use of Bi-partisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) funds for revenue-generating features such as fuel pumps and hangar construction.

While there is no guarantee the City ultimately receives hangar funds, BIL is the first source in recent history that the City has been able to identify for hangar construction.

The funding is not anticipated to be enough to construct nine hangars. However, FAA does not allow for use of the BIL funds to demolish hangars and that must come prior to construction.

DISCUSSION
The City released an informal bid packet for the demolition of the nine hangars in early 2025. The City subsequently issued a rejection of all bids on April 30, after becoming aware of potential owl nesting that had potential to impact the work.

Based on consultation with U.S. Fish and Wildlife officials in the Migratory Bird Permit Office and similar state offices, the City opted to reschedule the project timing to significantly reduce the likelihood of owl nesting at the site during work.

Page 162 of 207 ends

The City released the revised informal bid packet (Exhibit BJ on July 10, 2025. The City made changes to the packet to further meet the City's goal of providing a level playing field for all interested bidders. Changes included:
• Clarifying aspects of the project not available for the initial bid packet, including the complete asbestos report and details on foundations. • Providing information regarding potential migratory bird (owl) nesting. • Streamlining the application and review process with standardized forms. • Clearly limiting materials submissions to the items required by the City. • Requiring all bidders to sign acknowledgements to the same terms.

The City received two replies prior to the July 31, 2025 deadline. Both were determined responsive. The two bids were as follows:
a. Joe's Landscaping: Newman, CA based- $36,800
b. Don Lawley Company, Inc: Stockton, CA based- $39, 810 The lowest bid reply is attached as Exhibit C. The bidder has the appropriate State Contractor licenses to complete the work. If the Council moves forward with the contract, the City Manager would utilize a standard contract agreement approved to form by counsel, including standard City 10% contingency, the total contract would not exceed $40,480. The bid packet calls for project completion within twenty (20) working days of the City's Notice to Proceed.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEA) and the City of Gustine Environmental Quality Guidelines, an Initial Study was prepared to identify and assess potential environmental impacts as a result of this project. Through the Initial Study, staff determined that the project would not result in any significant adverse effects and the project can be categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15301 (I), Existing Facility. The project involves removal of existing small structures [accessory structures) that resulted in negligible or no expansion of use.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City budgeted $10,000 in FY25 (not utilized and will need to be re-appropriated to FY26) and $25,000 in FY26 from its CIP budgets to fund the demolition. Based on the bids received this is insufficient to cover the entire project. For this reason, staff is recommending to use the Gas Tax fund (Fund 012) for the remaining expenditure. There is sufficient fund balance to cover the remaining cost of this project ($5,480).

STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
The demolition of the hangars at the airport would Improve Aesthetic Appeal, which is Objective #1 of Strategic Goal #2 Community Based Development.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution:

1. Accepting the low bid from Joe's Landscaping & Concrete, Inc. in the amount of $36,800 for the removal of nine hangars at the Gustine Municipal Airport as listed in the attached bid, and authorizing the City Manager to execute the Agreement and any associated change orders up to ten percent ( l 0%) of the construction contract on behalf of the City of Gustine.

Page 163 of 207 ends

2. Amend the FY 2025-2026 budget by increasing appropriations in the Gas Tax Fund (Fund 012) in the amount of $5,480 and Airport Fund (063) in the amount of $10,000.

EXHIBIT(S)
A) Resolution accepting bid and authorizing City Manager to sign contract with Joe's Landscaping
B) Notice Inviting Informal Bids for Gustine Hangar Demolition Project- 25AP0003 C) Submittal by lowest bidder Joe's Landscaping
APPROVED BY:
-i.)
_
Soknirorn Than, City Manager

Page 164 of 207 ends

RESOLUTION 2025-XXXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GUSTINE ACCEPTING THE BID AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION OF NINE (9) HANGARS AT GUSTINE AIRPORT
WHEREAS, the City owns permanent hangars at Gustine Airport for which it has legal authority over and responsibility for; and
WHEREAS, the City has identified nine of these hangars as now being beyond reasonable repair standards and desires to have these demolished and removed for both aesthetic and safety reasons; and
WHEREAS, removal is required for future potential sources of funding that the City may be able to use to build new hangars; and
WHEREAS, the City conducted an informal bid process for Project Code 25AP0002 that standardized the submittal process and provided equal opportunity for all potential bidders; and
WHEREAS, the responsive and complete bids received are listed below;

CONTRACTOR
Joe's Landscaping:

Don Lawley Company, Inc:

TOTAL BID
$36,800
$39,810
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City of Gustine Environmental Quality Guidelines the Hangars Demolition Project was adequately evaluated and determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15301 (I), Existing Facilities.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Gustine:

Section 1. Adopt a Resolution to award a contract to Joe's Landscaping in the amount of Thirty-Six Thousand Eight Hundred dollars and zero cents ($36,800.00) Section 2. Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Joe's Landscaping and any associated change orders up to ten percent (10%) of the construction contract on behalf of the City of Gustine.

Section 3. Amend the FY 2025-2026 budget by increasing appropriations in the Gas Tax Fund (Fund 012) in the amount of $5,480 and Airport Fund (063) in the amount of $10,000 to cover the remainder of the cost of the project.

THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Gustine was passed at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of August 2025 and the resolution was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Page 165 of 207 ends

ATTEST:

Melanie Correa, Deputy City Clerk
City of Gustine
APPROVED:

Patrick Nagy, Mayor
City of Gustine

Page 166 of 207 ends

CITY OF GUSTINE
PO BOX 16 - 352 5 STREET
GUSTINE CA 95322
OFFICE (209) 854-6471- Fax (209) 854-2127
www.cityofgustine.com
FALL 2025 AIRPORT HANGAR DEMOLITION PROJECT
Notice Inviting Informal Bids to City of Gustine Public Works Department NAME OF PROJECT:

PROJECT LOCATION:

PROJECT CODE:

Airport Hangar Demolition - FALL 2025
Gustine Airport- 26467 State Highway 140, Gustine, CA
25AP0003
City of Gustine seeks qualified and experienced contractors to provide bids for services for the project listed above with specifications as listed in this document. The purpose of this notice inviting informal bids is to outline the project scope, requirements, and evaluation criteria for selecting a contractor to complete this project safely, efficiently, and in compliance with all applicable regulations. Through this process, all interested parties have the same opportunity to ask questions, receive the same answers and have the same opportunity to bid the project.

A. Informal Bid Schedule
Release of informal bid request
Site Visit at Gustine Airport
Questions from potential bidders due
Answers from City emailed to list
Deadline for all bids to City:

B. Anticipated Project Schedule
Council Award of Contract
Execute Contract Anticipated
Notice to Proceed
Time to Complete Project
Thursday, July 10, 2025
Thursday, July 17, 2025 at 8:30 am (pst)
Monday, July 21 by 2:00 pm (pst)
Wednesday, July 23, 2025 before COB
Thursday, July 31, 2025 by 2:00 pm (pst)
Tuesday, August 19, 2025 (Tentative)
Tuesday,August26,2025
10 days following contract execution
20 Working Days after date of the Notice
to Proceed
C. Project Overview
Gustine Airport has approximately 15 hangars for use for general aviation purposes. The hangars are of varying ages and conditions. The list of hangars to be demolished with specific dimensions, along with a satellite view of the hangar layout of the airport is attached as EXHIBIT B

Page 167 of 207 ends

Following its most recent inspection, the City has determined that several hangars are beyond reasonable repair and need to be demolished and all related debris removed from the premises. The hangars to be demolished are generally constructed of wood framing with metal roofs and siding, with mostly concrete foundations, which also shall be removed. The area where each hangar currently stands must be cleared for future use, leaving a bare, level plot of ground.

D. Notice to Bidders Regarding Asbestos Testing
In the Spring of 2025, the City hired an independent consultant to assess the hangars involved in the demolition specifically in regard to asbestos and hazardous materials. The contractor reports that there are no mitigation measures related for the project. The report is attached as EXHIBIT D.

E. Notice to Bidders on Migratory Bird Nesting
The City was made aware that in the spring of 2025 there were Barn Owls that had taken up residence in some of the hangars scheduled for demolition. Moving the project timeline to fall of 2025 moves it outside of their general nesting season. Bidders will need to submit the acknowledgement form, Exhibit E, in order to be considered responsive.

F. Notice to Bidders Regarding Bond Requirements
California Contract Code dictates that any public works project above $25,000 requires a payment bond. This project will require performance bond if the total bid amount is at or above $25,000.00. The Payment and Performance Bond shall be for one hundred percent (100%) of the Total Contract Price. Bidders should consider the bond requirement a cost of doing business and the City shall assume that all bids have factored in this requirement, whether called out on the bid submitted or not. Bid bond is not required.

G. Scope of Work
Below outlines the required scope for the project:

1. Pre-Demolition
a. Optional pre-bid site inspection (advised but not required) i. Public Works will be available for site visit at only one date and time, as listed in Section A of this Notice as "Site Visit."
NOTE: If no bidders arrive 20 minutes past the designated time, public works will shut the airport gate and assume there are no bidders interested in inspecting.
ii. Additional inspection times outside of (i) above will not be scheduled. iii. The exhibit photos are NOT necessarily the most recent photos of the buildings and the bidder acknowledges that as a condition of review and use.

Bidders utilize these at their own risk.
b. Obtaining necessary permits and approvals from local, state, and federal agencies as required. (San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control Board Demolition Permit, and City of Gustine Building Permit are required). Permit fees associated with this work will be the responsibility of the City.

2. Demolition
a. Demolition of all of the hangars identified in EXHIBIT B.

Page 168 of 207 ends

b. Demolishing the entire hangar structure and concrete foundations. General information on the foundations by structure are as follows (approximate):
i. Hangars 2/3/4
Six Concrete Column Footings (12" x 12"): 18 inches deep over native Inside Hangar: 2 inch thick AC floor
ii. Hangars 5/6/7
Six Concrete Column Footings (12" x 12"): 18 inches deep over native Inside Hangar: 2 inch thick AC floor
iii. Hangar 9
Strip Footing around the entire structure- 8 inches deep Inside Hangar: 3.5 inch thick AC floor
iv. Hangar 11
Consists of slab on grade covering the entire hangar area, 7 inches deep. v. Hangar13
Four Concrete Footings (12" x 12"): 18 inches deep over native Two concrete pads (total 340 sf): four inches thick
Inside Hangar: 2 inches thick AC floor
c. Removal of all debris, waste materials, and substances. d. Onsite BMPs in accordance with NPDES requirements.

3. Site Restoration
a. Debris cleanup of all portions of the demolished hangar and foundation b. Each hangar area shall consist of leveled ground at each of the hangar locations when work is complete. City has fill material available if import is needed for backfill. These are general soil and asphalt grinding. The contractor is responsible for transportation, loading and unloading of material as needed.

This material is stored at the Waste Water Treatment Plant at 26501 Carnation Road, Gustine, CA 95322.

H. Submitting Questions to the City

1. All questions and answers will be shared with any potential bidder sent this packet or who has requested information on this process. The same answer will be provided to all potential bidders.

2. The City will only reply to written questions submitted via email or dropped at City Hall.

3. Submit questions via email to: [email protected]

4. Questions may be dropped at 352 Fifth Street, Gustine.

5. Only questions received by the date and time in Section A as "Questions from potential bidders due" will be answered.

I. Submission Options
Submissions are acceptable in any of the below ways but only those received by the City prior to the deadline will be considered responsive.

Page 169 of 207 ends

1. In person at City Hall: 352 Fifth Street, Gustine, California a. Bids delivered must be in a sealed envelope with the following label on the outside: ATTENTION AIRPORT MANAGER/ HANGAR DEMO BID FALL 2025.

2. Mail/overnight: PO BOX 16, 352 Fifth Street, Gustine, CA 95322 a. Bids delivered must be in a sealed envelope with the following label on the outside: ATTENTION AIRPORT MANAGER/ HANGAR DEMO BID FALL 2025.

3. Email: [email protected]
a. Emails shall have the Subject Line: AIRPORT HANGAR DEMO BID J. Required Submission Format
All bidders must utilize the provided bid form. No other submission will be considered. Any variation or modification to the bid form will render the bid unresponsive.

All bids shall consist of Exhibit A: Required Bidder Sheet, filled out in its entirety.

Additionally, the Exhibit contains additional documents that the bidder must supply along with Exhibit A. This is outlined in the document. Submittals that do not fully meet the requirements in any way will be considered nonresponsive.

Bidders are cautioned against including any information outside Exhibit A and its required attachments, as any additional items included will not be considered in any way and will be discarded. The award will be made based solely upon Exhibit A and the required materials listed within that document.

The City of Gustine appreciates your interest in this
project and looks forward to receiving your bid.

Page 170 of 207 ends

EXHIBIT A: REQUIRED INFORMAL BID FORM
Every bidder must utilize this sheet to submit the bid. Only bids submitted using this form will be accepted. Bidders failing to submit this form, or those who do not fully complete the form, will be deemed "non responsive." Other formats by the bidder are not accepted in lieu of this form. The City will review only this form and any submission attachment listed as required in this form. No other documents will be considered.

Project Name: Airport Hangar Demolition- Fall 2025 Project Code: 25AP0003 I. COMPANY INFORMATION
Legal Company Name:

Address:

Authorized Agent for the Bid and Project:

Agent daytime phone:

Agent email address:

Signature of Authorized agent:

II. COMPANY PROFILE
Years in business:

Will you use subcontractors for this project? If yes, list each type:

Relevant experience in these types of projects (list 2 projects):

Any other relevant experience you would like to share (this box is optional):

Page 171 of 207 ends

Contractor must possess one or more of the below licenses from the State of California Contractors State License Board and any other necessary licenses and certifications:
i. License A: General Engineering Contractor
ii. License B: General Building Contractor
iii. License C-21: Building Moving/Demolition Contractor IV. BID PROPOSAL

Costs not included in this bid schedule above will not be paid for by the City, unless agreed ta in writing by the City as outlined in a signed City contract.

Page 172 of 207 ends

V. ATTESTATIONS ON BEHALF OF BIDDER BY AGENT SUBMITTING All of the below must be initialed by the Authorized Agent in Section I.

By initialing, the submitter is stating "I attest that:" Statement being attested to
This bid pertains to any and all work outlined in the Notice issued by the City and any official addendums as applicable.

The costs submitted on Schedule IV are based on prevailing wage.

The bidder has independently assessed the site and accepts responsibility for any assumptions made either through visit to the site or bidding based upon provided pictures or descriptions.

The bidder shall obtain any required permits or approvals from local state or federal agencies and the cost has been included in Section IV of this bid. (only permit fees associated with this work will be the responsibility of the City. Cost to prepare the permit will be the responsibility of the contractor)
The bidder is fully aware of EXHIBIT E to this packet pertaining to nesting of migratory birds (specifically owls) and will abide by the terms outlined in the Exhibit.

The bidder has all insurance requirements as listed in EXHIBIT F and those will remain in effect for the duration of the project. This will also apply to all subcontractors.

The bidder commits to abide by all health, safety and
environmental regulations at all times.

The bidder is a Department of Industrial Relations registered contractor pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5 ("DIR
Registered Contractor") and will remain so for the project duration.

The bidder is licensed from the State of California Contractors State License Board per Section 111 will remain so for the project duration.

The bidder acknowledges the listed deadlines in Section A of the Notice for this informal bidder must be met and that failure to meet those will render any submission nonresponsive. The City cannot review nonresponsive submittals.

SIGNATURE: _
Initials of Agent

Page 173 of 207 ends

VI. CHECKLIST REQUIRED ITEMS
All of the below must be submitted in order for a bid to be considered responsive.

Required Item
FULY COMPLETED EXHIBIT A: REQUIRED INFORMAL

BID SHEET FORM

PROOF OF LICENSES SHOWING EXPIRATION DATES
OF ALL LICENSES LISTED IN SECTION Ill

DOCUMENT SHOWING CURRENT REGISTRATION

WITH CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL

RELATIONS

MIGRATORY BIRD ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM

SIGNED (EXHIBIT E)
Initials of Agent
Indicating Attached
SIGNATURE: _

Page 174 of 207 ends

EXHIBIT B: HANGAR INFORMATION
Table A lists the approximate dimensions of the hangars to be included in the project. (Bidders are responsible for independently confirming prior to submitting bids.) ---------------
Hangar# 1 Dimensions
: , Approximate
2 33 X42
3 33 X42
4 33 X42
5 33 X42
6 33 X42
7 33 X42
9 Assumed similar #11
11 31 X 41
13 Assumed similar #11
NOTES
If a /icab/e.

Han ars 2, 3 & 4 are connected.

Han ars 5, 6 & 7 are connected.

Bidder to determine/confirm all sizes on site.

Diagram A Provides an aerial view of the hangars, identifying those for demolition.

Gustine Airport
Demolition Bids
Only hangars identified for demolition
are named on this diagram. Each bid
must include all the hangars that are
circled with an "X' and called out by
number in order to be considered.

For reference: Airport sign and entrance gate are here.

Hangar 2 / 3 / 4
Hangar 5 / 6 / 7
Hangar9
Hangar11
Hangar13

Page 175 of 207 ends

EXHIBIT C: HANGAR PHOTOS
Examples of condition of some of the hangars listed on the demolition list. Photos are not the most current and are included for illustrative purposes only. Bidders are encouraged to take advantage of the site inspection time provided in the notice.

Page 176 of 207 ends

EXHIBIT D
BOVEE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT INC.

ASBESTOS INSPECTION REPORT
M A R CH 24, 202 5
BEM PROJECT NO. 25-70251
Site
Gustine Airport
26467 State Highway 140
Gustine, CA 95322
Prepared For
Ms. Lori Sequeira
City of Gustine
P.O. Box 16
Gustine, CA 95322
Prepared By
BOVEE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, INC.
1643 3 Street, Escalon, CA 95320
Escalon 209-847-3800 • Fresno 559-264-3800 • Bakersfield 661-246-2110 • Sacramento 916-564-3838

Page 177 of 207 ends

March 24, 2025
Ms. Lori Sequeira
City of Gustine
P.O. Box 16
Gustine, CA 95322
Ms. Sequeira:

Bovee Environmental Management, Inc. (BEM) is pleased to provide this Asbestos Survey Report regarding our asbestos inspection services at the Project Site summarized below.

I. PROJECT SUMMARY TABLE

PROJECT SITE TYPE
Gustine Ai art

INSPECTION TYPE
Asbestos Surve

PROJECT SITE LOCATION
26467 State Hi hwa 140, Gustine, CA 95322

INSPECTED AREAS
Hangars #2. #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #9, #11, #13

PROJECT SITE NOTE
Demolition

INSPECTION DATE
March 21, 2025
II. INSPECTION SUMMARY
Samples of building materials considered to be suspect asbestos containing materials* were identified and collected from the inspected areas referenced above to determine their asbestos content. Through proper chain-of-custody the collected samples are sent to Central Valley Laboratories for polarized light microscopy (PLM) analysis. A summary of all materials sampled and corresponding analytical results are listed below. Detailed information regarding sample number, actual sample location and analytical methods can be reviewed in attachments A and B.

SAMPLE COLLECTION SUMMARY
See definitions on page 2.
# MATERIAL SAMPLED MATERIAL LOCATION ASBESTOS CATEGORY SO.FT. 70251-01 Mastic Hangars #2, #3 & #4; Hangar Doors None Detected - - 70251-02 Paint Hangars #2, #3 & #4; Dividing Walls & None Detected . - Hangar Doors 70251-03 Asphalt Hangars #2, #3 & #4; Floors None Detected . . 70251-04 Concrete Hangars #2, #3 & #4; Footings None Detected - - 70251-05 Asphalt Hangars #5, #6 & #7; Floors None Detected . . 70251-06 Concrete Hangars #5, #6 & #7; Footings None Detected . . 70251-07 Paint Hangar #9; Exterior None Detected - -
70251.-08 Asphalt Hangar #9; Floor None Detected - .
70251-09 Concrete Hangar #9; Footings None Detected . . 70251-10 Paint Hangar #I I; Exterior None Detected . .
70251-11 Concrete Hangar#! I; Foundation None Detected - .

Sample Collection Summary table continued on page 2.

BEM Project No. 25-70251

Page 178 of 207 ends

BEM Project No. 25-70251
# MATERIAL SAMPLED MATERIAL LOCATION ASBESTOS CATEGORY SQ.FT. 70251-12 Paint Hangar #13; Exterior None Detected - -
70251-13 Asphalt Hangar #13; Floor None Detected - -
70251-14 Concrete Hangar#13; Pads None Detected - -
70251-15 Concrete Hangar #13; Footings None Detected - .

Ill. DEFINITIONS (*)
Suspect Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) - Local air quality management districts consider a material that is not wood, metal or glass, to be a suspect ACM. All suspect ACMs are assumed to contain asbestos until laboratory analysis confirms that a material has no asbestos content.

Category - ACM's are classified as either "friable", material that can be easily crushed or pulverized by normal hand pressure or as "non-friable", material that cannot be easily crushed or pulverized by normal hand pressure. Friable A CMs are considered a Regulated Asbestos Containing Material (RA CM) requiring Class I work practices and engineering controls. Non-friable A CMs are considered either Category I or Category II Asbestos Containing Material requiring Class II work practices and engineering controls.

Trace- Analytical results that are equal to or less than 1.0 percent asbestos by weight, but greater than 0.1 percent. Materials with a trace amount of asbestos have to be removed as asbestos containing construction material (ACCM) according to Cal-OSHA, but can be disposed as non-ACM upon point count analyses according to federal and state EPA regulations. Materials equal to or less than 0.1 percent asbestos by weight are not regulated by Cal-OSHA or EPA.

Homogeneous Multiple samples collected of a suspect material that is similar in general appearance and from areas that appear to have been constructed at the same time are considered homogeneous. If multiple samples are collected from a similar material within a homogeneous area and only one of the multiple samples is found to contain asbestos, regulations mandate that the entirety of that material with the homogeneous area must be considered an ACM.

VFT Vinyl Floor Tile TBD To be determined
IV. ASBESTOS REGULATORY STANDARDS
California Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal-OSHA) •Friable and Non-Friable ACCMs containing more than 0.1 percent asbestos by weight are regulated. •Enforces regulations pertaining to workers performing ACCM removal and workers in close proximity. •Contractors who disturb more than 100 square feet or 160 lineal feet of ACCM must be registered by the contractor's state license board as an asbestos removal contractor. •Contractors who disturb any amount of ACCM must ensure employee protection by providing accredited training, medical examinations, personal protective equipment and a negative exposure assessment.

United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
•Friable and Non-Friable ACMs containing more than 1.0 percent asbestos by weight are regulated. •Enforces regulations pertaining to protecting the environment, not workers. •Abatement Contractors who disturb more than 160 square feet or 260 linear feet of ACM must comply with the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants Asbestos Regulations (40 CFR 61, Subpart M) and all state and federal requirements regarding asbestos. 1643 3STREET, ESC LO, CA 95320·833-643-3800·
2

Page 179 of 207 ends

BEM Project No. 25-70251
Local Air Quality Control Districts
•Friable and Non-Friable ACM's containing more than 1.0 percent asbestos by weight are regulated. •Enforces regulations pertaining to local air quality; "No Visible Air Emissions". •Require an asbestos survey prior to renovation or demolition. • Abatement Contractors who disturb more than 160 square feet or 260 linear feet of ACM must comply with the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants Asbestos Regulations (40 CFR 61, Subpart M).

V. RECOMMENDATIONS
BEM recommends compliance with all federal, state and local regulations concerning asbestos.

VI. WARRANTY
Samples of suspect asbestos containing building materials, which could be disturbed during construction activities, are collected by BEM. Site inspections and sample collection methodologies are performed to meet regulatory standards and industry protocols. BEM warrants that the findings contained herein have been promulgated in general accordance with accepted professional practices at the time of its preparation as applied by professionals in the community. There is a possibility that conditions may exist in which suspect ACM's could not be identified within the scope of the survey or were not apparent or accessible during the site visit. All scheduled work should cease and additional samples should be collected if unidentified suspect ACM's are discovered during construction activities. If roofing materials were collected for this survey, BEM is not responsible for damages caused by sampling locations or roofing warranty voids with the manufacturer.

If quantities of asbestos containing materials are stated in this report, they are supplied for budgetary and regulatory notification purposes only. They should not be relied on for abatement bidding purposes.

VII. CERTIFICATION
Inspection services relative to the Subject Site were provided by BEM's Mr. Brett L. Bovee & Mr. Anthony J. Miller, Certified Asbestos Consultants, No. 95-1643, expiring on 03/08/2026 & Number 19-6474, expiring on 04/17/2026.

BEM looks forward to assisting you in the near future. If you have any questions regarding this report or other BEM services, please do not hesitate to call us at (209) 847-3800 or (833) 643-3800.

Regards,
Brett L. Bov~e, CAC, CMC, CDPH
Certified Asbestos Consultant No. 95-1643
hAtlo d. Mtt.+
Anthony J. Miller, CAC, CDPH
Certified Asbestos Consultant No. 19-6474
1643 3STREET, ESCALON, CA 95320·833-643-3800·
3

Page 180 of 207 ends

ATTACHMENT A
BEM

SAMPLE FIELD SHEET

Page 181 of 207 ends

TURN-AROUND TIME
0 @ SAME DAY O 24HOURS
eeM oecr+ ,- '0(/
SURVEY TYPE:

SAMPLE DATE: '1- S

CHAIN OF CUSTODY
1643 3 STREET
ESCALON, CA 95320
833-643-3800 • [email protected]
Project Name: Gukst A:es»n G»..

Point Count Trace Results .

Address: 447 Gkk :lo 1{0. [at CA 0632 0 YES-400 0 YES-1000 • NO A De»s
I
T ' ype of Loss:

Areas Inspected: kcrs .3q G.4.7. 0. ll 3 !
J . . , ' Surface vol./ua.
i5
Sample# Sample Description T. Time LPM .., 3 z LA z 6
.at � 3 tr
¢ :;; u
Vd' Mat. pee\as:( WC Fl
- 0 va e. 74 000 6 O 0 0 0 0 0 0
lout a Daw¢
atoe,
, WC Fl
.M 000 ¢ O 0 0 0 0 0 0
- 02 vat.toe ,
3,4 n..»·ls., .lie d A.ut f).re
""A5ult - I I WC Fl
- 037 006 $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mat toe ·, , ul
at.Pe(usu WC FL
(H ate. 2,3. • Fuah\\\C,
000 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
wa.oe As;la WC Fl
- 0 Ma»tee. G,( 7 OO 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ae
~kc
WC Fl
- 0¢ Mate C.L•7 fol
000 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ma.oee
?Pote I WC Fl
07 000 e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
- wate. 9 •
Pee Ag2l« I WC FL
0Os O 0 0 0 0 0 0
0¥ Mat. Loe.: q
vaPe(
cucke
WC Fl
- 0 Mattee. 0, fol;6
000 O 0 0 0 0 0 0
aer,
• WC Fl
lo
« % 000 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
- vat.toe. 1l [vl
waPe Cu WC Fl
000 d O 0 0 0 0 0 0
- 1l Mat. toc.: 1[ o.a« dal1 ,»
aPee, WC Fl
-I o; 000 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 ate· 1z fl
Mae Ay7.le
WC Fl
.., 3 O0t d O 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mat Loc.: '"' Mat. Desc («er+t WC Fl
- J oal 000 d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mat. Loc.: t
awe Cu WC Fl
IS 000 • ...
n o o 0 0 0 0 fa-«
h
Mat toe. j}
Mat. Desc: - w" WC Fl
00o 0 0 rs rs ,.., 0 0 0 ' V
Mat. Loe.: -
Mat. Desc.: WC FL
0 0 ::, n o 0 o 0 0
-- Mat, Loe.:

Rel@dished r 5\W%kw Received by: AF Relinquished by: Received by:

Mh /- 6We fills X X
hmes/ohte. -2-2$ Time/Date: 3/24/25 8:00AM Time/Date: Time/Date:

BEMUSE ONLY: Accept Samples KV ves .AF date 3/24 Version: FCOC.03.15.22.1/1.QM

Page 182 of 207 ends

ATTACHMENT B

LABORATORY

ANALYTICAL REPORT

Page 183 of 207 ends

CVL

CENTRAL VALLEY

LABORATORIES
Report Prepared For:

Bovee Environmental Management
1643 3rd Street
Escalon, CA 95320
Client Project:

Report ID:

Dear Customer:
25-70251
AE250608
Enclosed are asbestos analysis results for PLM Bulk samples received at our laboratory on March 24, 2025 . The samples were analyzed for asbestos using polarizing light microscopy (PLM) under EPA 600/R-93/116 and EPA - Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR Part 763 Methods.

Sample results containing >1% asbestos are considered asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) per EPA regulatory requirements. The detection limit for the EPA 600 Method is <1% asbestos by weight as determined by visual estimation.

TOT AL SAMPLES ANALYZED:

TOTAL LAYERS ANALYZED:
# LAYERS >1% ASBESTOS:

NlDj

TESTING
�
NVLAP Lab Code 600260
15 15
0 Kind Regards,
4ea.

CVL Laboratory Director
Central Valley Laboratories
1643 3rd Street • Escalon, CA 95320 • Office 209-691-1800 Page 1 of 5

Page 184 of 207 ends

ASBESTOS REPORT SUMMARY
CVL

CENTRAL VALLEY

LABORATORIES
Client Project: 25-70251 Report ID: AE250608
By: POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY
Client: Bovee Environmental Management
1643 3rd Street
Escalon, CA 95320
Methodology: EPA 600/R-93/116 and EPA-Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR Part 763 Client ID Layer Lab ID Color Sample Description % Asbestos 70251-01 AE2504249 Tan Mastic None Detected
70251-02 AE2504250 Beige Paint None Detected
70251-03 AE2504251 Black Asphalt None Detected
70251-04 AE2504252 Gray Concrete None Detected
70251-05 AE2504253 Black Asphalt None Detected
70251-06 AE2504254 Gray Concrete None Detected
70251-07 AE2504255 Tan Paint None Detected
70251-08 AE2504256 Black Asphalt None Detected
70251-09 AE2504257 Gray Concrete None Detected
70251-10 AE2504258 Grayish Blue Paint None Detected
70251-11 AE2504259 Lt. Gray Concrete None Detected
70251-12 AE2504260 Grayish Blue Paint None Detected
70251-13 AE2504261 Black Asphalt None Detected
70251-14 AE2504262 Lt. Gray Concrete None Detected
70251-15 AE2504263 Gray Concrete None Detected
Central Valley Laboratories
1643 3rd Street • Escalon, CA 95320 • Office 209-691-1800 Page 2 of 5

Page 185 of 207 ends

CVL

ASBESTOS BULK ANALYSIS
By: POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY

CENTRAL VALLEY

LABORATORIES
Bovee Environmental Management
1643 3rd Street
Escalon, CA 95320
Client Project: 25-70251
Report ID:

Received:

Analyzed:

Reported:

AE250608
03/24/2025
03/24/2025
03/24/2025
Client:

Methodology: EPA 600/R-93/116 and EPA -- Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR Part 763 Client ID Lab
Sample ID Description
70251-01
AE2504249 Mastic
70251-02
AE2504250 Paint
Lab
Attributes
Tan
Homogeneous
Non-Fibrous
Bound
Beige
Homogeneous
Non-Fibrous
Bound
Fibrous Non-Fibrous
Mastic
Paint
100%
100%

ASBESTOS
%
None Detected
None Detected

NON-ASBESTOS COMPONENTS
70251-03
AE2504251 Asphalt
70251-04
AE2504252 Concrete
70251-05
AE2504253 Asphalt
70251-06
AE2504254 Concrete
70251-07
AE2504255 Paint
70251-08
AE2504256 Asphalt
70251-09
AE2504257 Concrete
Black
Homogeneous
Non-Fibrous
Bound
Gray
Homogeneous
Non-Fibrous
Tightly Bound
Black
Homogeneous
Non-Fibrous
Bound
Gray
Homogeneous
Non-Fibrous
Tightly Bound
Tan
Homogeneous
Non-Fibrous
Bound
Black
Homogeneous
Non-Fibrous
Bound
Gray
Homogeneous
Non-Fibrous
Tightly Bound
Tar 60% None Detected
Gravel 30%
Silicates 10%
Silicates 50% None Detected
Binder/Filler 30%
Gravel 20%
Tar 60% None Detected
Gravel 30%
Silicates 10%
Silicates 50% None Detected
Binder/Filler 30%
Gravel 20%
Paint 100% None Detected
Tar 60% None Detected
Gravel 30%
Silicates 10%
Silicates 50% None Detected
Binder/Filler 30%
Gravel 20%
Central Valley Laboratories
1643 3rd Street • Escalon, CA 95320 • Office 209-691-1800 Page 3 of 5

Page 186 of 207 ends

CVL

ASBESTOS BULK ANALYSIS
By: POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY

CENTRAL VALLEY

LABORATORIES
Bovee Environmental Management
1643 3rd Street
Escalon, CA 95320
Client Project: 25-70251
Report ID:

Received:

Analyzed:

Reported:

AE250608
03/24/2025
03/24/2025
03/24/2025
Client:

Methodology: EPA 600/R-93/116 and EPA -- Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR Part 763 Client ID Lab
Sample ID Description
70251-10
AE2504258 Paint
70251-11
AE2504259 Concrete
70251-12
AE2504260 Paint
Lab
Attributes
Grayish Blue
Homogeneous
Non-Fibrous
Bound
Lt. Gray
Homogeneous
Non-Fibrous
Tightly Bound
Grayish Blue
Homogeneous
Non-Fibrous
Bound
Fibrous Non-Fibrous
Paint
Silicates
Binder/Filler
Gravel
Paint
100%
50%
30%
20%
100%

ASBESTOS
%
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected

NON-ASBESTOS COMPONENTS
70251-13
AE2504261 Asphalt
70251-14
AE2504262 Concrete
70251-15
AE2504263 Concrete
Black
Homogeneous
Non-Fibrous
Bound
Lt. Gray
Homogeneous
Non-Fibrous
Tightly Bound
Gray
Homogeneous
Non-Fibrous
Tightly Bound
Tar 60% None Detected
Gravel 30%
Silicates 10%
Silicates 50% None Detected
Binder/Filler 30%
Gravel 20%
Silicates 50% None Detected
Binder/Filler 30%
Gravel 20%
Central Valley Laboratories
1643 3rd Street • Escalon, CA 95320 • Office 209-691-1800 Page 4 of 5

Page 187 of 207 ends

CVL

ASBESTOS BULK ANALYSIS
By: POLARIZED LIGHT MICROSCOPY
Client: Bovee Environmental Management
1643 3rd Street
Escalon, CA 95320
Report ID:

Received:

Analyzed:

Reported:

AE250608
03/24/2025
03/24/2025
03/24/2025

CENTRAL VALLEY

LABORATORIES
Client Project: 25-70251
Methodology: EPA 600/R-93/116 and EPA -- Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR Part 763 Analyst:

Waverly Green
Zach Johnston
Test Date:
03/24/2025
03/24/2025
Samples Tested:

AE2504257 AE2504258 AE2504259 AE2504260 AE2504261 AE2504262 AE2504263 AE2504249 AE2504250 AE2504251 AE2504252 AE2504253 AE2504254 AE2504255 AE2504256 LEGEND: Non-Anth = Non-Asbestiform Anthophyllite Non-Trem = Non-Asbestiform Tremolite METHOD:

REPORTING LIMIT:

EPA 600/R-93/116 and EPA -- Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR Part 763 <1% by Visual Estimation
REPORTING LIMIT FOR POINT COUNTS: 0.25% by 400 Points or 0.1 % by 1,000 Points REGULATORY LIMIT: >1 % by Weight
Due to the limitations of the EPA 600 method, nonfriable organically bound materials (NOBs) such as vinyl floor tiles can be difficult to analyze via polarized light microscopy {PLM). EPA recommends that all NOBs analyzed by PLM, and found not to contain asbestos, be further analyzed by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). Please note that PLM analysis of dust and soil samples for asbestos is not covered under any of Central Valley Laboratories' accreditations, Estimated measurement of uncertainty is available on request.

This report relates only to the samples tested or analyzed and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by Central Valley Laboratories (CVL). CVL makes no warranty representation regarding the accuracy of customer submitted information in preparing and presenting analytical results. Interpretation of the analytical results is the sole responsibility of the customer. Samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report may not be used by the customer to claim product endorsement by NVLAP, AIHA, ELAP, NIST or any agency of the U.S. Government.

CVL is accredited with the Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP) under Certificate Number 3013.

CVL is accredited for Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Building Materials by PLM by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP Lab Code 600260-0).

Report Authorized By
5 1Wlg.j
TESTING v-1
NVLAP Lab Code 600260
_..

Analyzed By
C7 z,m Joh-= Date
Co-Analyzed y
03/24/2025 �
n Date
Central Valley Laboratories
1643 3rd Street • Escalon, CA 95320 • Office 209-691-1800 Page 5 of 5

Page 188 of 207 ends

ATTACHMENT C

SITE DRAWING

Page 189 of 207 ends

9-702$\
)H6? Skk Hwy 1HO Gushot cA 095322
I
02 o]
o}
I
0$
pl
I
4 l
12

Page 190 of 207 ends

EXHIBIT E- MIGRATORY/PROTECTED BIRD ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM This form must be read, signed and returned
with Exhibit A for any bid to be considered responsive.

In the spring of 2025, a third party alerted the City of the presence of barn owls in and around the hangars at Gustine Airport. The City immediately contacted officials at appropriate organizations to discuss requirements related to a planned hangar demolition and these migratory birds.

Upon the recommendation of these organizations, including U.S. Fish and Wildlife, the City delayed the demolition project. The project was thought to be too close to the known nesting season for the barn owls. Moving the project to Fall, the City has reduced, as much as possible, the chance that barn owls would still be nesting in the hangars being demolished. It would be highly uncommon for barn owls to be nesting in this area in the fall season.

However, potential bidders need to be aware that the birds do, at some times, nest in the area. In order to receive award of bid for this project, potential bidders must agree to all of the following in regard to these migratory birds:
• All workers and subcontractors will be advised of the potential of nesting of these birds and asked to be on the alert for such activity. • Attachment A to this Exhibit will be shared with all individuals working on the project to assist in identifying nests.
• If contractor's representatives find any active nests (containing eggs and/or hatchlings) during the project, contractor will immediately cease work and contact the City for direction. No work will resume until the City has advised the contractor of needed remediation and that work is cleared to begin again. • The City may, at its discretion, assign a third party to monitor this type of species activity. If this takes place, contractor would be required to provide access to this third party upon request..

Although the City believes active nesting at the time of year this project is taking place is highly unlikely, these steps are being taken out of an abundance of caution.

By signing below, the Agent confirms agreement by the bidder to all terms above related to migratory/protected birds related to this project.

Name of Company: _
Agent Name (printed): _
Signature: _
Date:
--------

Page 191 of 207 ends

EXHIBIT F: INSURANCE COVERAGE
Requirements for Insurance for City vendors are generally below.

Please note: Levels shown generally increase at least annually. The insurance requirements the City mandates at the time the work may be higher than the below minimums.

Insurance. Contractor or Consultant (herein referred to as "Consultant'? shall not commence work for the City until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has secured all insurance required under this section. a. Commercial General Liability
() The Consultant shall take out and maintain, during the performance of all work under this Agreement, in amounts not less than specified herein, Commercial General Liability Insurance, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City. (ii) Coverage for Commercial General Liability insurance shall be at least as broad as the following:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (Occurrence Form CG 00 01) or exact equivalent.
(iii) Commercial General Liability Insurance must include coverage for the following:
(1) Bodily Injury and Property Damage
(2) Personal Injury/Advertising Injury
(3) Premises/Operations Liability
( 4) Products/Completed Operations Liability
(5) Aggregate Limits that Apply per Project
(6) Explosion, Collapse and Underground (UCX) exclusion deleted (7) Contractual Liability with respect to this Agreement (8) Property Damage
(9) Independent Contractors Coverage
(iv) The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability; (2) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another; (3) products/completed operations liability; or (4) contain any other exclusion contrary to the Agreement.
(v) The policy shall give City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and City designated volunteers additional insured status using ISO endorsement forms CG 20 10 10 01 and 20 37 10 01, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (vi) The general liability program may utilize either deductibles or provide coverage excess of a self-insured retention, subject to written approval by the City, and provided that such deductibles shall not apply to the City as an additional insured. b. Automobile Liability
(i) At all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain Automobile Liability Insurance for bodily injury and property damage including coverage for owned, non-owned and hired vehicles, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City.

Page 192 of 207 ends

(ii) Coverage for automobile liability insurance shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 00 01 covering automobile liability (Coverage Symbol 1, any auto).
(iii) The policy shall give City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and City designated volunteers additional insured status.
(iv) Subject to written approval by the City, the automobile liability program may utilize deductibles, provided that such deductibles shall not apply to the City as an additional insured, but not a self-insured retention.
c. Workers' Compensation/Employer's Liability
(i) Consultant certifies that he/she is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and he/she will comply with such provisions before commencing work under this Agreement.
(ii) To the extent Consultant has employees at any time during the term of this Agreement, at all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain full compensation insurance for all persons employed directly by him/her to carry out the work contemplated under this Agreement, all in accordance with the "Workers' Compensation and Insurance Act," Division IV of the Labor Code of the State of California and any acts amendatory thereof, and Employer's Liability Coverage in amounts indicated herein. Consultant shall require all subconsultants to obtain and maintain, for the period required by this Agreement, workers' compensation coverage of the same type and limits as specified in this section.
d. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions)
not applicable.
e. Minimum Policy Limits Required
(i) The following insurance limits are required for the Agreement:

Combined Single Limit Minimums
Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 per occurrence/ $4,000,000 aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage
Automobile Liability $2,000,000 combined single limit
Employer's Liability $1,000,000 per accident or disease Professional Liability not applicable
(ii) Defense costs shall be payable in addition to the limits. (iii) Requirements of specific coverage or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Any available coverage shall be provided to the parties required to be named as Additional Insured pursuant to this Agreement.

Page 193 of 207 ends

EXHIBIT A: REQUIRED INFORMAL BID FORM
Every bidder must utilize this sheet to submit the bid. Only bids submitted using this form will be accepted. Bidders failing to submit this form, or those who do not fully complete the form, will be deemed "nonresponsive." Other formats by the bidder are not accepted in lieu of this form. The City will review only this form and any submission attachment listed as required In this form. No other documents will be considered.

Project Name: Airport Hangar Demolition- Fall 2025 Project Code: 25AP0003 I. COMPANY INFORMATION
Legal Company Name:/1oz5s Ladc
Address:
802 17s Newmon Cc s¢o
Authorized Agent for the Bid and Project:
) h
] a TC
Agent daytime phone: 20 40% - o0 %
Agent email address:

Signature of Authorized agent:

II. COMPANY PROFILE
Years in business: 2o «a-s Pl5
Will you use subcontractors for this project? If yes, list each type:

Relevant experience in these types of projects (list 2 projects):

Locl +lg 5£f/ Do
Ok 6cove 0ado-solar
Any other relevant experience you would like to share (this box is optional):

Page 194 of 207 ends

Ill. LICENSE INFORMATION
All licenses listed as re uired in the Bid Descri tion must be included below.

LICENSE TYPE & NAME BIDDER LICENSE#
86364'7

EXPIRATION DATE
/o 3/ '26
Contractor must possess one or more of the below licenses from the State of California Contractors State License Board and any other necessary licenses and certifications:
i. License A: General Engineering Contractor
ii. License B: General Building Contractor
iii. License C-21: Building Moving/Demolition Contractor IV. BID PROPOSAL

BID SCHEDULE
(All sections must be completed. DO NOT leave blanks.)
No Item Description Unit of Measure Est. Qty. Unit Price Item Cost 1 Mobilization, Bonds, and LS 1.0
Contract Processing Costs 73.0 73%0
2 Hangar Demolition (Structure) LS 1.0 73Go 3%0
3 Hangar Demolition (Foundation) LS 1.0 7360
I 73%0
4 Site Restoration (including LS 1.0
backfill, transportation and 7,340 73%0 compaction) t
6 Clean up and Demobilization LS 1.0 73¢0
I 7340
ro1AL so Pace#3> G6,60o 11 six hhou.all, c4}khordread dllas Costs not included in this bid schedule above will not be paid for by the City, unless agreed to in writing by the City as outlined in a signed City contract.

Page 195 of 207 ends

V. ATTESTATIONS ON BEHALF OF BIDDER BY AGENT SUBMITTING All of the below must be initialed by the Authorized Agent in Section I By initialing, the submitter is stating "l attest that:" Statement being attested to
This bid pertains to any and all work outlined in the Notice issued by the City and any official addendums as applicable.

The costs submitted on Schedule IV are based on prevailing wage.

The bidder has independently assessed the site and accepts responsibility for any assumptions made either through visit to the site or bidding based upon provided pictures or descriptions.

The bidder has all insurance requirements as listed in EXHIBIT F and those will remain in effect for the duration of the project This will also apply to all subcontractors.

The bidder commits to abide by all health, safety and
environmental regulations at all times.

The bidder is a Department of Industrial Relations registered contractor pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5 ("DIR
Registered Contractor") and will remain so for the project duration.

The bidder is licensed from the State of California Contractors State License Board per Section Ill will remain so for the project duration.

Initials of Agent
/
E
73 )
J 73
?
-J73

Page 196 of 207 ends

VI. CHECKLIST REQUIRED ITEMS
All of the below must be submitted in order for a bid to be considered responsive.

Required Item
FUL Y COMPLETED EXHIBIT A: REQUIRED INFORMAL

BID SHEET FORM

PROOF OF LICENSES SHOWING EXPIRATION DATES
OF ALL LICENSES LISTED IN SECTION Ill

DOCUMENT SHOWING CURRENT REGISTRATION

WITH CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL

RELATIONS

MIGRATORY BIRD ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM

SIGNED (EXHIBIT E)
Initials of Agent
Indicating Attached
.J
JB
.)£

Page 197 of 207 ends

EXHIBIT E- MIGRATORYIPROTECTED BIRD ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM This form_must be read, signed_and returned
with Exhibit A for any bid to be considered responsive.

Although the City believes active nesting at the time of year this project is taking place is highly unlikely, these steps are being taken out of an abundance of caution.

By signing below, the Agent confirms agreement by the bidder to all terms above related to migratory/protected birds related to this project.

Name of Company: __ < __ )o_R._S_L_ -�-c._c..,...p__, n_5_c..--_ 1 _C_o_n c __ n:_:-k-_
T 7
Agent Name (printed): _/ch. lo
oar. s4
0a.. 22
F
2 I ge

Page 198 of 207 ends

dlr.Indus .. trial Relations

STAT E OF CAL)F OEN)A

APPLICATION FOR

PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION
Registration Information
Type: Public Works
Period: 07/01/2023 06/30/2026
Contractor Information
Contractor Name: JOE'S LANDSCAPING & CONCRETE, INC
Trade Name: JOE'S LANDSCAPING
License Type Number: 1000047632
Contractor Physical Address
Physical Business Country: United States of America
Physical Business Address: 802 INYO AVE
Contractor Mailing Address
Mailing Country: United States of America
Mailing Address: 802 INYO AVE
Contact Info
Daytime Phone:

Mobile Phone:

Physical Business City/ NEWMAN
Province:

Physical Business State: CA
Physical Business Postal 95360
Code:

Malling City /Province: NEWMAN
Mailing State: CA
Mailing Postal Code: 95360
Daytime Phone Ext.:

Business Email: [email protected]
Applicant's Email: [email protected]
Registration Services:: Page 1 of 2 5/31/2023 2:19:55 PM

Page 199 of 207 ends

Workers' Compensation
Professional Employer Organization (PEO)
Do you lease employees through Professional Employer Organization? Yes PEO Name: BBSI
Street address: 11111 STREET STE 107
City, State, Zip: MODESTO, CA 95354
PEO Email Address:

PEO Phone Numbers: (209) 576-0322
Workers' Compensation Overview
Carrier: ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE

COMPANY
Policyholder Name: JOE'S LANDSCAPING &

CONCRETE INC
Policy Number: C51249914
Certification
Inception Date: 08/01/2022
Expiration Date: August 1, 2023
Yes I certify that I do not have any delinquent liability to an employee or the state for any assessment of back wages or related damages, interest, fines, or penalties pursuant to any final judgment, order, or determination by a court or any federal, state, or local administrative agency, including a confirmed arbitration award Yes I certify that the contractor is not currently debarred under Section 1777.1 or under any other federal or state law providing for the debarment of contractors from public works.

Yes I certify that one of the following is true: (1) I am licensed by the Contractors State License Board (CSLB) in accordance with Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of the Business and Professions Code; or (2) my business or trade is not subject to licensing by the CSLB.

I understand refunds are not authorized
I, janet figueroa, the undersigned, am , JOE'S LANDSCAPING & CONCRETE, INC with the authority to act for and on behalf of the above named contractor. I certify under penalty of perjury that all of the above information provided is true and correct. I further acknowledge that any untruthful information provided in this application could result in the certification being canceled.

I certify this on: 2:15 PM
Legal Entity Information
Legal Entity Type: Corporation
Name: JOE'S LANDSCAPING & CONCRETE, INC
Registration Services:: Page 2 of 2

Page 200 of 207 ends

CONTRACTORS STATE LICENSE BOAR
0Contractor's License Detail for License #
853867
DISCLAIMER: A license status check provides information taken from the CSLB license database. Before relying on this Information, you should be aware of the following limitations.
» CSLB complaint disclosure is restricted by law(BP 7124 6)If this entity is subject to public complaint disclosure click on hunk that will appear below far more information Click here for a definition of disclosable actions Only construction related civil judgments reported to CSLB are disclosed (8&P 7071 17) Arbitrations are not lisred unless the contractor fails to comply wth the terms Due to workload, there may be relevant information that has not yet been entered into the board's license database Data current as of 8/5/2025 12:23:04 PM
Business !nformater

JOE'S LANDSCAPING & CONCRETE INC
dba JOE'S LANDSCAPING
PO BOXB83
NEWMAN, CA 95360
Business Phone Number:(209) 862-2004
Entity Corporation
Issue Date 02/01/2005
Reissue Date 10/20/2010
Expire Date 10/31/2026
This license is current and active.

Al information below should be reviewed.
» C27-LANDSCAPING

CS-CONCRETE
» C-6L/D49-TREF SERVICE
» CI3-FENCING

B GENERA BUILDING
» CI2-EARTHWORK AND PAVING
» C2I BUILDING MOVING DEMOLITION

Page 201 of 207 ends

ITEM NO. 17

COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
AUGUST 19, 2025
PREPARED BY: Mario B. Gouveia, City Engineer
SUBJECT: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Gustine Accepting Bid and Awarding a Construction Contract to Consolidated Engineering, Inc., for the Construction of the 2025 SB 1 Improvements Project, and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement
STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS: 5. Robust Infrastructure

BACKGROUND
At the June 17, 2025 Council meeting, Council approved a list of projects for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 funded by Senate Bill 1 (SB 1) and other transportation funds to address basic road maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety needs. The 2025 SB 1 project includes pavement rehabilitation improvements for the following roadway segments included in the SB 1 project list.
• Lucerne Avenue between Jensen Road and Linden Avenue
• Elm Avenue between Meredith Avenue and Wallis Avenue
• 4t Avenue from West Avenue to the Alley west of 5 Street • 4th Avenue from the Alley east of 5t Street to 4t Street • Alley east of 5t Street between 5t Avenue and 6t Avenue • Railroad Avenue from Hunt Road and Sullivan Road intersection to Meredith Avenue
• Hunt Road north of Railroad Avenue
The rehabilitations include pulverizing, edge planing, planing to a depth of 2 and 4 inches, applying a leveling course, applying a chip seal, paving, reapplying pavement striping and markings, and other miscellaneous appurtenant work.

ANALYSIS/DISCUSSION
Following a public bidding process, the project was advertised in the Gustine Press Standard on July 2, July 9, July 16, and July 23, 2025. The City received a total of four (4) bids that were opened and read aloud at 2:00 p.m. on July 30, 2025, this being the advertised bid opening date and time. All four (4) of the bids were deemed responsive and the lowest responsive and responsible bid was submitted by Consolidated Engineering, Inc. in the amount of four hundred eighty-eight thousand eight hundred eighty-five dollars and sixty cents ($488,885.60). The bid results were as listed:

Page 202 of 207 ends

CONTRACTOR
Consolidated Engineering, Inc. $
Hensley's Paving & General Engineering, Inc. $
United Pavement Maintenance, Inc. $
Dirt Dynasty, Inc. $
The Engineer's Estimate was $571,517.70.

TOTAL BID
488,885.60
499,593.01
501,373.86
598,062.80

FISCAL IMPACT
The project is budgeted under the following funds for a total of $769,128.00:
• SB l (Fund 203) - $225,000.00
• Measure V (Fund 201) - $300,000.00
• RSTP (Fund 021) - $44,128.00
• Gas Tax (Fund 010) - $200,000.00

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City of Gustine Environmental Quality Guidelines, an Initial Study was prepared to identify and assess potential environmental impacts as a result of this project. Through the Initial Study, staff determined that the project would not result in any significant adverse effects and the project can be categorically exempt pursuant to pursuant to Section 15301 (c), Existing Facility. The project involves repairing and rehabilitating existing infrastructures that resulted in negligible or no expansion of use.

STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS
This item correlates to Strategic Plan Goad #5 - Robust infrastructure, as the purpose of rehabilitating the various streets will increase the overall quality of the road system, enhancing safety and mobility.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution accepting bid and awarding a construction contract to Consolidated Engineering, Inc. for the construction of the 2025 SB l Improvements project and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement and any associated change orders up to ten percent ( l 0%) of the construction contract on behalf of the City of Gustine.

EXHIBIT(S)
A) Resolution
B) Abstract of Bids
C) Exhibit Project Limits
APPROVED BY: --------------- Sok n i r o rn Than, City Manager

Page 203 of 207 ends

RESOLUTION 2025-XXXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GUSTINE ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO CONSOLIDATED ENGINEERING, INC. FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE 2025 SBl IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Gustine is currently improving the City's existing infrastructure and identified several streets in need of repair; and WHEREAS, on May 24, 2024 Council approved a list of projects for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Funded by Senate Bill 1 (SB 1) to address basic road maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety needs; and
WHEREAS, the work consists of rehabilitating several streets within the City of Gustine. The rehabilitations include pulverizing, edge planing, planing to a depth of 2 and 4 inches, applying a leveling course, applying a chip seal, paving, reapplying pavement striping and markings, and other miscellaneous appurtenant work; and WHEREAS, the invitation to bid for the construction of 2025 SB 1 Improvements was advertised in the Gustine Press Standard on July 2, July 9, July 16, and July 23, 2025; and WHEREAS, a total of four (4) bids were received and read aloud at 2:00 p.m. on July 30, 2025 at the City of Gustine City Hall, this being the advertised bid opening date and time; and
WHEREAS, all four (4) of those bids were deemed responsive; and WHEREAS, the bid results were as listed below; and

CONTRACTOR
Consolidated Engineering, Inc. $
Hensley's Paving & General Engineering, Inc. $
United Pavement Maintenance, Inc. $
Dirt Dynasty, Inc. $

TOTAL BID
488,885.60
499,593.01
501,373.86
598,062.80
WHEREAS, the Engineer's Estimate was $571,517.70; and
WHEREAS, the bids have been reviewed by the City Engineer and Consolidated Engineering, Inc. submitted the lowest responsive and responsible bid; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City of Gustine Environmental Quality Guidelines the 2025 SB 1 Improvements Project was adequately evaluated and determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15301 (c), Existing Facilities.

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Gustine accepts the bid from Consolidated Engineering, Inc. and now desires to enter into an agreement to construct the project.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Gustine:

Page 204 of 207 ends

Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated by reference.

Section 2. The City Council does hereby accept the bid of Consolidated Engineering, Inc. as noted above, and finds that Consolidated Engineering, Inc. is the lowest responsive and responsible bidder.

Section 3. The City Council further awards the construction contract to Consolidated Engineering, Inc. in the total bid amount of four hundred eighty-eight thousand eight hundred eighty-five dollars and sixty cents ($488,885.60) and authorizes the City Manager to execute an agreement and any associated change orders up to ten percent (10%) of the construction contract on behalf of the City of Gustine.

Section 4. This Resolution will become effective immediately.

THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Gustine was passed by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of August, 2025, and the resolution was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:

Patrick Nagy, Mayor
City of Gustine
ATTEST:

Melanie Correa, City Clerk
City of Gustine

Page 205 of 207 ends

ABSTRACT OF BIDS FOR

CITY OF GUSTINE
2025 SBI Improvements
Bid Opening: July 30, 2025 at 2:00 p.m.

Hensley's Paving and General United Pavement Maintenance, Consolidated Engincering, Inc. Engineering, Inc. Inc. Dirt Dynasty, Inc.

Engineer's Estimate 5860 Amos Lane 1310 I Yosemite Blvd. 2907 Tully Road 4110 Meadow Oaks Dr.

Valley Springs. CA 95252 Waterford, CA 95323 Hughson, CA 95326 Valley Springs, CA 95252 Item Quantity
No. Item Description and Unit Unit Price Amount Unit Price Amount Unit Price Amount Unit Price Amount Unit Price Amount I Mobilization I LS 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 25,000,00 24,984.54 24,984.54 19,578.00 19,578.00 25,000.00 25,000.00 2 Traffic Control I LS 10.000.00 10,000,00 10,000.00 10,000.00 9,696.00 9,696.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 3 Pulverize and Grade Pavement 60,967 SF I30 79,257.10 0.60 36,580.20 1.00 60,967.00 0.69 42.067.23 1.90 115,837.30 4 Asphalt Concrete Edge Planing 2,599 LF 25.00 64,975.00 2.85 7,407.15 0.90 2,339.10 3.85 10.006.15 6,00 15.594,00 5 Asphalt Concrete Planing at 4-Inches Depth 7.231 SF 1.00 7,231.00 2.15 15,546.65 1.23 8,894.13 1.40 10,123.40 2.00 14,462.00 6 Asphalt Concrete Planing at 2-Inches Depth 7,216 SF 0.60 4,329.60 I.OS 7,576.80 0.64 4,618.24 1.38 9,958.08 2.00 14,432.00 7 Furnish and Place Asphalt Concrete 1,872 TN 135.00 252,720.00 134.50 251,784.00 135.00 252,720.00 144.06 269,680.32 130.00 243,360.00 8 Furnish and Place 3/8" Chips 80 TN 400.00 32.000.00 778.00 62,240.00 590.80 47,264.00 469.87 37,589.60 952.00 76,160.00 9 Furnish and Place Asphaltie Emulsion (Chip 12'TN
Seal) 1,800.00 21,600.00 1,123.00 13,476.00 1,120,00 13.440.00 1,487.50 17,850.00 751.00 9,012.00 IU Place Shoulder Backing 258 LF 4.00 1,032.00 17.00 4,386.00 20.00 5,160.00 30.51 7.871.58 47.00 12.126.00 II Adjust Valve Box to Grade 4 EA 1,200.00 4,800.00 830.00 3,320.00 1,400.00 5,600,00 1,500.00 6,000.00 1.400.00 5.600.00 12 Adjust Manhole Cover to Grade 6 EA 2,000.00 12,000.00 830.00 4,980.00 J,400.00 8,400.00 2,045.00 12,270.00 1,400.00 8,400.00 13 djust Monument Box to Grade 3 EA 1,200.00 3.600.00 830.00 2.490.00 1,400.00 4,200.00 1,500.00 4,500.00 1.400.00 4,200.00 14 Adjust Sewer Clean Out to Grade 3 EA 1,200.00 3,600.00 830.00 2,490.00 1,400.00 4,200.00 1,500.00 4,500.00 1,500.00 4,500.00 15 Apply Single 6-Inch Thermoplastic Striping 4.319 LF 4.00 17,276.00 1.60 6,910.40 2.80 12,093.20 1.50 6,478.50 1.50 6,478.50 l6 Apply Double 6-Inch Thermoplastic Striping 1,579 LF 6.00 9.474.00 3.15 4,973.85 5.60 8.842.40 3.00 4,737.00 3.00 4,737.00 17 pply Thermoplastic Markings 2,247 SF 9.00 20,223.00 12.65 28,424.55 11.20 25,166.40 12.00 26,964.00 12.00 26,964.00 18 Furnish and Install Yield Signs 2 EA 1,200.00 2.400.00 650.00 1,300.00 504.00 1,008.00 600.00 1,200.00 600.00 1,200.00 BID TOTAL $571,517.70 $488,885.60 $499,593.01 $501,373.86 $598,062.80 Subeontractors Listed: Pavement Recycling
Chrisp Company
Pavement Coatings Co.

Pavement Recycling Womach Striping TBS Contractors Talley Oil Chrisp Company Talley Oil
Chrisp Company American Pavement Systems
945.25

Page 206 of 207 ends

- 'noscr iocunow
·
_ tar
mes,
s9ON
'
<
wwt l
_ '=
• 1
I I
,
L

PROJECT
LocAT1ON
L1
Sr:ALF N FEET

Page 207 of 207 ends

Gustine City CouncilAugust 19, 2025

Gustine City Council
August 19, 2025