Half Moon Bay City Council
February 15, 2022

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

REGULAR MEETING

CITY OF HALF MOON BAY
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 2022
REMOTE PARTICIPATION (SEE NEXT PAGE) Debbie Ruddock, Mayor Deborah Penrose, Vice Mayor
Robert Brownstone, Councilmember
Joaquin Jimenez, Councilmember
Harvey Rarback, Councilmember
7:00 PM
This agenda contains a brief description of each item to be considered. Those wishing to address the City Council on any matter not listed on the Agenda, but within the jurisdiction of the City Council to resolve, may come forward to the podium during the Public Forum portion of the Agenda and will have a maximum of three minutes to discuss their item.

Those wishing to speak on a Public Hearing matter will be called forward at the appropriate time during the Public Hearing consideration.

Please Note: Anyone wishing to present materials to the City Council, please submit seven copies to the City Clerk.

Copies of written documentation relating to each item of business on the Agenda are on file in the Office of the City Clerk at City Hall and the Half Moon Bay Library where they are available for public inspection. If requested, the agenda shall be available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132.) Information may be obtained by calling 650-726- 8271.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, special assistance for participation in this meeting can be obtained by contacting the City Clerk’s Office at 650-726-8271. A 48-hour notification will enable the City to make reasonable accommodations to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II). http://hmbcity.com/
1 SPECIAL REMOTE PARTICIPATION PROTOCOLS
This meeting will be held entirely by teleconference. All Councilmembers and staff will only participate via the Zoom platform using the process described below. The meeting is being conducted pursuant to recent amendments to the teleconference rules required by the Ralph M. Brown Act allowing teleconferencing during a proclaimed state of emergency when local officials have recommended social distancing (AB 361). The purpose of AB 361 is to provide the safest environment for the public, elected officials, and staff while allowing for continued operation of the government and public participation during the COVID‐19 pandemic.

This meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar and live Spanish interpretation will be available within the Zoom platform. Members of the public are welcome to login into the webinar as Attendees. During any public comment portions, attendees may use the “raise your hand” feature and will be called upon and unmuted when it is their turn to speak. The meeting will also be streamed on Channel 27, on pacificcoast.tv, and on Facebook at www.facebook.com/cityofhalfmoonbay. Please click to join the webinar: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/95535614263 or join by phone at 669-900-9128, using Webinar ID 955-3561-4263. If joining by phone, use *9 to raise your hand, *6 to mute and unmute.

CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL

APPROVAL OF AGENDA

PUBLIC FORUM

PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

MIDCOAST COMMUNITY COUNCIL UPDATE

EQUITY EXPRESS PRESENTATION

MAYOR'S ANNOUNCEMENTS OF COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICE

REPORT OUT FROM RECENT CLOSED SESSION MEETINGS

CITY MANAGER UPDATES TO COUNCIL
COVID-19 UPDATE

1. CONSENT CALENDAR

1.A WAIVE READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES

1.B WARRANTS FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY 2022
Staff Recommendation: Accept the warrants list for the month of January 2022.

STAFF REPORT
ATTACHMENT 1

1.C APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Staff Recommendation: Approve meeting minutes for the October 5, 2021 Regular, November 2, 2021 Regular, November 9, 2021 Special, November 16, 2021 Special, 2 November 16, 2021 Regular, December 7, 2021 Closed Session, December 7, 2021 Special, December 7, 2021 Regular, December 21, 2021 Regular, and January 19, 2022 Special meetings.

ATTACHMENT 1

1.D BUILDING ELECTRIFICATION ORDINANCE - SECOND READING Staff Recommendation: Waive second reading and adopt an ordinance adopting a new chapter 14.06 to the Half Moon Bay Municipal Code entitled “Electrification of Buildings.”

STAFF REPORT

ORDINANCE

1.E MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION TO THE AARP NETWORK OF AGE FRIENDLY STATES

AND COMMUNITIES
Staff Recommendation: Adopt a resolution approving the membership application to the AARP Network of Age Friendly States and Communities and authorize the Mayor to sign the accompanying letter.

STAFF REPORT

RESOLUTION
ATTACHMENT 2

1.F RE-RATIFICATION OF RESOLUTION TO CONTINUE HOLDING PUBLIC MEETINGS REMOTELY (AB 361)
Staff Recommendation: By motion, in accordance with Assembly Bill 361, re-ratify the findings in Resolution No. 2021-80 to continue conducting the City’s Council, Commission, and Committee meetings remotely due to health and safety concerns to the public due to COVID-19.

STAFF REPORT

1.G RECEIPT OF LEGISLATIVE POSITION LETTERS
Staff Recommendation: Receive and file support letter sent for Senate Bill 45.

STAFF REPORT
ATTACHMENT 1
3 1.H REDISTRICTING PROCESS / TIMELINE
Staff Recommendation: Receive and file report on process and timeline for the 2021- 2022 Redistricting Process and direct staff as appropriate.

STAFF REPORT
ATTACHMENT 1

2. ORDINANCES AND PUBLIC HEARINGS

2.A INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 1.24 WITH

RESPECT TO ELECTING MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, REDRAWING BOUNDARIES, AND SEQUENCING OF ELECTIONS WITHIN THE DISTRICTS (8:15 PM) Staff Recommendation: Conduct a public hearing and introduce on first reading, an ordinance amending Chapter 1.24 of the Half Moon Bay Municipal Code with respect to electing members of the City Council, redrawing boundaries, and sequencing of elections within the districts.

STAFF REPORT

ORDINANCE
ATTACHMENT 2
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 4
ATTACHMENT 5

3. RESOLUTIONS AND STAFF REPORTS

3.A POPLAR STREET - DEFERRED STREET IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS Staff Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council:
1) Request staff send letters to the owners of the 20 parcels on Poplar Street with existing Deferred Street Improvement Agreements (Agreements) indicating the City’s intent to seek payment for a portion of the deferred frontage improvements in conjunction with the Poplar Street Traffic Calming and Safety Project (Poplar Project); and
4 2) Direct staff to return to the City Council within 90 days to formalize the methodology of allocating and calculating costs for each parcel and alternatives for installment payment plans.

STAFF REPORT
ATTACHMENT 1
ATTACHMENT 2
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 4

COMMISSION / COMMITTEE UPDATES

CITY COUNCIL REPORTS / FUTURE ITEMS

ADJOURNMENT
5 BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY

AGENDA REPORT
For meeting of:           February 15, 2021
TO:   Honorable Mayor and City Council
VIA:   Bob Nisbet, City Manager
From:    Lisa Lopez, Administrative Services Director

TITLE: WARRANTS FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY 2022
______________________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION:

Accept the warrants list for the month of January 2022.

STRATEGIC ELEMENT:

This recommendation supports the Fiscal Sustainability and Inclusive Governance Element.

DISCUSSION:

During this month, we processed 5 check runs. The first was on January 4, totaling $17,610.77.

The second was on January 6, totaling $318,021.79. The third was on January 13, totaling $196,665.13. The fourth was on January 20, totaling $1,683,656.59. The fifth was on January 27, totaling $306,613.13. The total for the month was $2,522,567.43.

The City processed payments related to 20 capital improvement projects, in a total amount of $728,049.75. These projects include: Street Resurfacing, HWY 1 Safety/Traffic Reduction Improvements, HWY1 Safety/Congestion, Citywide Sidewalk Assessment, Poplar Complete Street Project, Urban Forest Management Program, Emergency Response Program, Facility Management Asset, Parks Master Plan Implementation, Carter Park Improvement, Poplar Beach Gateways Plan, Bikeway Connectivity Project‐ North, Main Street Bridge Rehabilitation, Climate Action and Adaption, Magnolia/Seymour Park, Smith Field Site Assessment, Main Street Lights, Corp Yard Improvements, Ocean Colony Pump Station Replacement, Inflow and Infiltration Program.

Staff is also including a list of all payments above $30,000 processed during this reporting period, as listed in the table below.
6 ATTACHMENTS:

Check Disbursement List by Check Date
7 City of Half Moon Bay Check Register - Summary HMB Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 1/1/2022 - 1/31/2022 Feb 02, 2022 01:07PM Report Criteria:

Report type: SummaryCheck.Type = "Calculated","manual"
Check Number Vendor Number Payee Check Issue Date Amount Description 50376 2407 ARAMARK 01/06/2022 409.20 MAINT SERVICE50377 444 ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS 01/06/2022 346.52 LEVELIZED CHARGE NAT GAS50378 3526 BIGGS CARDOSA ASSOCIATES INC 01/06/2022 432.50 DEC'21, PREPERATION OF PS&E AND ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAR50379 5168 BLEYLE ELEVATOR, INC 01/06/2022 190.00 MAINT SERVICE50380 5223 CAPITAL ONE TRADE CREDIT 01/06/2022 1,446.31 MAINT SUPPLIES50381 4484 CSW/STUBER-STROEH ENGINEERING GROUP INC 01/06/2022 25,847.50 OCT'21-NOV'21, POPLAR STREET TRAFFIC CALMING AND SAF 50382 5326 DON FOWLER CONSTRUCTION 01/06/2022 101,583.88 JAN'22, SHERIFF SUBSTATION RENOVATION PROJECT50383 4398 ELS ARCHITECTURE & URBAN DESIGN 01/06/2022 15,600.00 NOV'21, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN FOR CORP YARD50384 3446 FLYERS ENERGY, LLC 01/06/2022 1,748.69 VEHICLE FUEL50385 3127 FREYER & LAURETA INC. 01/06/2022 11,895.00 NOV'21, SMITH FIELD PARKING LOT50386 1545 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. 01/06/2022 460.00 CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT REVIEW FEE50387 1853 HDL SOFTWARE LLC 01/06/2022 937.74 TOT AND BUSINESS LICENSE MANAGEMENT50388 4267 IMPEC GROUP INC. 01/06/2022 16,145.74 DEC'21, FY21/22 JANITORIAL & MAINTENANCE SERVICES50389 96 JAMES FORD INC. 01/06/2022 165.23 VEHICLE SERVICE50390 4098 KIM GAINZA 01/06/2022 100.00 DEPOSIT REFUND 10/10/21 DEPOT ROOM50391 4028 LORAL LANDSCAPING INC. 01/06/2022 2,000.00 DEC'21, FY21/22 LANDSCAPE AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES50392 3746 MALCOLM C SMITH 01/06/2022 605.00 DEC'21, COMMUNICATION CONSULTANT50393 3069 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 01/06/2022 304.00 EAP50394 1206 MARK THOMAS & CO. INC. 01/06/2022 17,429.23 NOV'21, HWY1 NORTH SAFETY & OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMEN50395 4589 MCA DIRECT 01/06/2022 1,801.07 MUNICIPAL ELECTION HANDBOOK50396 2014 MOORE IAGOFANO GOLTSMAN INC. 01/06/2022 833.75 NOV'21, SUSTAINABILITY-CAAP50397 3641 NEIGHBORHOOD RADIO 01/06/2022 200.00 ADVERTISING SERVICE50398 457 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 01/06/2022 202.87 PW OFFICE SUPPLIES50399 3956 PENINSULA MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING INC. 01/06/2022 36,472.00 DEC'21, PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR EASTSIDE PA50400 141 PHIL'S TIRE & AUTO CARE 01/06/2022 1,409.28 VEHICLE REPAIR50401 3951 PUBLIC PARKING ASSOCIATES INC 01/06/2022 165.00 MAINT SERVICE50402 5219 RED CAR ANALYTICS 01/06/2022 1,158.75 DEC'21, HMB LIBRARY ZERO NET ENERGY SUPPORT SERVICE50403 252 RICE TRUCKING-SOIL FARM INC. 01/06/2022 1,050.01 MAINT SUPPLIES50404 3757 SCHAFF & WHEELER 01/06/2022 2,570.00 NOV'21, OCEAN COLONY CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT FOR 20/250405 3101 SHRED-IT USA LLC 01/06/2022 165.69 RECORDS MANAGEMENT50406 5301 SUBURBAN PROPANE LP 01/06/2022 1,336.43 PROPANE50407 1352 SWRCB ACCOUNTING OFFICE 01/06/2022 10,602.00 ANNUAL WATER PERMIT FEE50408 1497 TURBO DATA SYSTEMS 01/06/2022 782.80 CITATION PROCESSING50409 1232 U.S. BANK GLOBAL CORPORATE TRUST SERVICE 01/06/2022 24,858.10 FACITLIY LEASE #ISRF-21-139-A50410 3701 V. W. HOUSEN & ASSOCIATES INC. 01/06/2022 18,075.50 NOV'21-DEC'21, FY21/22 WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM 50411 3871 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 01/06/2022 12,192.00 DEC'21, FY21/22 TREE MAINTENANCE M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
8 City of Half Moon Bay Check Register - Summary HMB Page: 2 Check Issue Dates: 1/1/2022 - 1/31/2022 Feb 02, 2022 01:07PM Check Number Vendor Number Payee Check Issue Date Amount Description 50412 3162 WHELEN CONSTRUCTION 01/06/2022 6,500.00 SHERIFF SUBSTATION50414 2022 ACC BUSINESS 01/13/2022 776.44 INTERNET SERVICE50415 4300 AT&T 01/13/2022 1,767.56 PHONE SERVICE50416 4115 BIG BELLY SOLAR INC 01/13/2022 2,542.02 DEC'21, SMART TRASH RECEPTACLES50417 866 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE COASTSIDE 01/13/2022 150.00 EVENT CENTER RENTAL50418 4577 CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC INFO. 01/13/2022 625.00 EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS ACADEMY 50419 4193 CASELLE INC. 01/13/2022 3,744.00 ERP CONTRACT SUPPORT & MAINTENANCE50420 1925 CITY OF BURLINGAME 01/13/2022 551.48 OCT'21 SMCO BID50421 293 CLEARLITE TROPHIES 01/13/2022 296.87 OFFICE SUPPLIES50422 3975 COLANTUONO HIGHSMITH WHATLEY PC 01/13/2022 28,486.50 LEGAL SERVICES -SAM50423 3643 CORODATA RECORDS MANAGEMENT INC 01/13/2022 335.60 RECORDS MANAGEMENT50424 3086 DIRECTV 01/13/2022 91.98 DIRECTV SERVICE50425 5348 ECO OFFICE, INC. 01/13/2022 18,402.22 JAN'22, SHERIFF'S SUBSTATION RENOVATIONS50426 4633 GRANICUS 01/13/2022 1,419.37 JAN'22, GRANICUS SERVICE50427 89 HALF MOON BAY COASTSIDE CHAMBER OF COM 01/13/2022 7,331.00 OCT'21 OOC BID 50428 82 HALF MOON BAY REVIEW 01/13/2022 6,922.00 LEGAL AD50429 1853 HDL SOFTWARE LLC 01/13/2022 613.92 BUSINESS LICENSE SOFTWARE50430 4293 LOCKWORKS UNLIMINTED INC 01/13/2022 570.00 MAINT SERVICE50431 3726 NICHOLAS LASZKIEWICZ 01/13/2022 1,258.00 TRANSLATION SERVICES50432 457 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 01/13/2022 410.29 ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES50433 4472 ON POINT LANGUAGE SOLUTIONS LLC 01/13/2022 2,175.00 TRANSLATION SERVICES50434 5350 ORACIO BAUTISTA 01/13/2022 500.00 DEPOSIT REFUND 01/08/22 DEPOT ROOM50435 3359 PACIFICA COMMUNITY TELEVISION 01/13/2022 18,100.00 FY21/22 Q2 RECORDING SERVICE50436 5020 QUADIENT FINANCE USA, INC 01/13/2022 1,060.61 POSTAGE50437 5020 QUADIENT LEASING USA, INC. 01/13/2022 1,151.44 LEASE PAYMENT50438 5317 RAGAN COMMUNICATIONS, INC 01/13/2022 299.00 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL50439 2797 SAN MATEO DAILY JOURNAL 01/13/2022 1,875.00 ADVERTISING SERVICE50440 3085 SHUTE MIHALY & WEINBERGER LLP 01/13/2022 80,305.08 GENERAL MATTERS50441 5319 TETRA TECH, INC. 01/13/2022 9,000.00 DEC'21, EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN50442 3955 TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS 01/13/2022 5,000.00 NOV'21, TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS50443 4296 YOUTH LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE 01/13/2022 904.75 PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION TOWARDS POLICING IN HAL50444 4211 ABUNDANT GRACE COASTSIDE WORKER 01/20/2022 28,389.66 SEP'21, FY21/22 COASTAL CLEAN TEAM50445 18 ANDREINI BROTHERS INC. 01/20/2022 1,920.95 MAINT SERVICE50446 3355 ASUNCION GIJON 01/20/2022 1,900.00 MAINT SERVICE50447 4209 BAIRD & DRISKELL 01/20/2022 10,300.00 JAN'22, AFFORDABLE HOUSING ASSISTANCE50448 481 BIG CREEK LUMBER 01/20/2022 7,127.50 CREDIT MAINT SUPPLIES50449 4368 BRENDA CARRASCO 01/20/2022 500.00 DEPOSIT REFUND 02/05/22 DEPOT ROOM50450 3079 CA DEPT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS 01/20/2022 675.00 CONVEYANCE50451 3532 CALIFORNIA COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN SOLS. 01/20/2022 900.00 FY20/21 WATER USAGE DATA COLLECTION50452 3976 CIRCLEPOINT 01/20/2022 7,008.75 DEC'21, CONTINGENCY FOR HYATT HOTEL ENVIRONMENTAL I M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
9 City of Half Moon Bay Check Register - Summary HMB Page: 3 Check Issue Dates: 1/1/2022 - 1/31/2022 Feb 02, 2022 01:07PM Check Number Vendor Number Payee Check Issue Date Amount Description 50453 51 COASTSIDE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 01/20/2022 4,554.46 LIFT STATION FAIRWAY50454 5318 COLUMN SOFTWARE, PBC 01/20/2022 132.00 PUBLIC NOTICE50455 4398 ELS ARCHITECTURE & URBAN DESIGN 01/20/2022 12,500.00 NOV'21, CARTER PARK IMPROVEMENTS50456 3127 FREYER & LAURETA INC. 01/20/2022 17,229.45 NOV'21-DEC'21, KELLY AVE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS P50457 3782 GRIFFIN STRUCTURES INC. 01/20/2022 846.72 DEC'21, CARTER PARK RENOVATION PROJECT50458 76 HALF MOON BAY BUILDING & GARDEN 01/20/2022 290.78 MAINT SUPPLIES50459 2564 HALF MOON BAY GRADING & PAVING INC. 01/20/2022 12,379.32 DEC'21, STORM DRAIN REPAIR AND STORM CLEAN UP50460 89 HMB COASTSIDE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 01/20/2022 40,000.00 2ND INSTALLMENT, FY21/22 BID FUNDING50461 89 HMB COASTSIDE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 01/20/2022 35,000.00 ANNUAL PAYMENT TO HMB CHAMBER OF COMMERCE50462 3429 HUE & CRY INC 01/20/2022 157.95 SECURITY SERVICE50463 1645 HUFFMAN-BROADWAY GROUP INC 01/20/2022 8,662.50 OCT'21-DEC'21, POPLAR BEACH GATEWAYS PLAN50464 96 JAMES FORD INC. 01/20/2022 1,495.66 VEHICLE SERVICE50465 5351 JOAQUIN TEJEDA 01/20/2022 500.00 DEPOSIT REFUND 01/15/22 DEPOT ROOM50466 103 KIKUCHI & ASSOC. 01/20/2022 640.00 DEC'21, DESIGN AND CDP FOR MAGNOLIA PARK50467 4110 LISA POPE 01/20/2022 1,093.75 TRANSCRIPTION SERVICE50468 1206 MARK THOMAS & CO. INC. 01/20/2022 59,650.23 OCT'21, HWY1 NORTH SAFETY & OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMEN50469 209 MAZE & ASSOCIATES 01/20/2022 5,570.00 FY20/21 AUDITING SERVICES50470 3934 MITEL 01/20/2022 2,798.24 SHERIFF SUBSTATION PHONE SERVICE50471 4566 PACIFIC COAST TRANE 01/20/2022 357.00 DEC'21, LIBRARY BUILDING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS SUPPOR50472 137 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 01/20/2022 8,356.92 NW HWY1 & MAIN STREET50473 2784 PAPE MACHINERY INC 01/20/2022 154,972.76 JOHN DEERE 310SL-1702834250474 3370 PRESIDIO SYSTEMS INC. 01/20/2022 2,750.00 MAINT SERVICE50475 29 READYREFRESH 01/20/2022 69.15 WATER FOR CORP YARD50476 5352 REYNALDO BULOSAN 01/20/2022 600.00 RESERVATION REFUND 01/29/22 GRAND OAK50477 751 SAN MATEO COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 01/20/2022 954.00 HEALTH INSPECTION50478 216 SAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 01/20/2022 825,776.85 Q3, FY21/22 LAW ENFORCEMENT UAAL CREDIT50479 2797 SAN MATEO DAILY JOURNAL 01/20/2022 660.00 ADVERTISING SERVICE50480 159 SEWER AUTHORITY MID-COASTSIDE 01/20/2022 353,492.57 JAN'22, FY21/22 SEWER AUTHORITY MID-COASTSIDE OPERATI50481 159 SEWER AUTHORITY MID-COASTSIDE 01/20/2022 24,752.37 JAN'22, FY21/22 SEWER COLLECTIONS50482 3519 SWCA INCORPORATED 01/20/2022 2,465.00 TREE MAINT50483 1352 SWRCB ACCOUNTING OFFICE 01/20/2022 600.00 ANNUAL WATER PERMIT FEE50484 1232 U.S. BANK GLOBAL CORPORATE TRUST SERVICE 01/20/2022 21,115.63 FACITLIY LEASE #ISRF-21-139-B50485 407 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC. 01/20/2022 654.00 MAINT SERVICE50486 4429 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR COMPANY 01/20/2022 1,207.42 DEC'21, FY21/22 PEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM50487 3162 WHELEN CONSTRUCTION 01/20/2022 14,890.00 SHERIFF SUBSTATION50488 5190 Wood Consulting Services 01/20/2022 7,760.00 NOV'21, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATION50489 2022 ACC BUSINESS 01/27/2022 776.44 INTERNET SERVICE50490 3332 AMERICAN PORTABLES 01/27/2022 1,612.81 JAN'21, FY21/22 PORTABLE RESTROOM FACILITIES50491 4115 BIG BELLY SOLAR INC 01/27/2022 1,271.01 JAN'22, SMART TRASH RECEPTACLES50492 3626 BKF ENGINEERS 01/27/2022 4,775.00 NOV'21-DEC'21, CORP YARD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
10 City of Half Moon Bay Check Register - Summary HMB Page: 4 Check Issue Dates: 1/1/2022 - 1/31/2022 Feb 02, 2022 01:07PM Check Number Vendor Number Payee Check Issue Date Amount Description 50493 5225 CA STATE TREASURY CONDEMNATION FUND 01/27/2022 50,000.00 EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION FILED, CASE NO. 21-CIV-0156050494 5225 CA STATE TREASURY CONDEMNATION FUND 01/27/2022 10,000.00 EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION FILED, CASE NO. 21-CIV-0602750495 1925 CITY OF BURLINGAME 01/27/2022 9,164.48 NOV'21 SMCO BID50496 2941 CSG CONSULTANTS INC. 01/27/2022 3,248.75 DEC'21, NPDES STORMWATER SERVICES50497 4484 CSW/STUBER-STROEH ENGINEERING GROUP INC 01/27/2022 20,924.67 JAN'21, POPLAR STREET TRAFFIC CALMING AND SAFETY PRO 50498 3086 DIRECTV 01/27/2022 98.23 DIRECTV SERVICE50499 5326 DON FOWLER CONSTRUCTION 01/27/2022 55,848.60 JAN'22, SHERIFF SUBSTATION RENOVATION PROJECT50500 4398 ELS ARCHITECTURE & URBAN DESIGN 01/27/2022 11,500.00 DEC'21, CARTER PARK PHASE 2 DESIGN SERVICES 50501 5349 GATES AND ASSOCIATES 01/27/2022 9,218.46 DEC'21, SMITH FIELD FACILITIES MASTER PLAN50502 89 HALF MOON BAY COASTSIDE CHAMBER OF COM 01/27/2022 17,439.00 NOV'21 OOC BID 50503 2564 HALF MOON BAY GRADING & PAVING INC. 01/27/2022 21,483.90 MAINT SERVICE50504 1853 HDL SOFTWARE LLC 01/27/2022 28,954.95 TOT AND BUSINESS LICENSE MANAGEMENT50505 1283 KATHY OLER 01/27/2022 1,900.00 FEB'22, TEMPORARY CITY PARKING LOT RENTAL50506 2699 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 01/27/2022 2,273.21 JAN'21, PRINTER AND SCANNER LEASE AGREEMENT50507 3922 LLOYD A MCVICKER 01/27/2022 3,360.00 FEB'22 ANNEX RENT50508 3069 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK 01/27/2022 304.00 EAP50509 2997 NICHOLS CONSULTING ENGINEERS CHTD 01/27/2022 5,465.79 DEC'21,POPLAR BEACH GATEWAYS PLAN50510 4339 PLAN JPA 01/27/2022 6,578.64 GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS50511 252 RICE TRUCKING-SOIL FARM INC. 01/27/2022 568.75 MAINT SUPPLIES50512 1760 STEPFORD 01/27/2022 15,115.00 MAR'21, FY20/21 IT SERVICES50513 3519 SWCA INCORPORATED 01/27/2022 6,593.02 DEC'21, CORP YARD ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 50514 3004 VERIZON WIRELESS 01/27/2022 307.84 MOBILE SERVICES50515 3871 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 01/27/2022 17,830.60 DEC'21, FY21/22 TREE MAINTENANCE50516 3923 WELLS FARGO 01/04/2022 17,610.77 12/01/21 HASSETT/PUMP STATION GATE PARTS M Grand Totals:
140 2,522,567.43
Report Criteria:

Report type: SummaryCheck.Type = "Calculated","manual"
M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
11 MINUTES

CITY OF HALF MOON BAY CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 5, 2021
VIRTUAL VIA ZOOM MEETING (COVID-19 PROTOCOLS)

CONVENE REGULAR MEETING / ROLL CALL
Mayor Brownstone called the meeting to order at 7:11 p.m. and led the pledge of allegiance.

ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Penrose, Rarback and Jimenez, Vice Mayor Ruddock, and Mayor Brownstone

PUBLIC FORUM
The following individuals addressed the Council:
• Tim Pond
• Shannon Murray
• Ralph Litscher
• Sarah Bueno
• Lizzette Solis
Councilmember Penrose requested the Council reconsider the vote on Measure D.

PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

NATIONAL INDIGENOUS PEOPLES DAY PROCLAMATION
Mayor Brownstone read the proclamation declaring October 11, 2021 as National Indigenous Peoples Day.

LGBTQ HISTORY MONTH PROCLAMATION
Mayor Brownstone read the proclamation declaring October as LGBTQ History Month. Jenny Walter thanked the Council and invited the community to the upcoming activities. 12 OCTOBER 5, 2021
City Council Minutes

PG&E WILDFIRE SAFETY UPDATE
Emergency Services Analyst Stocker discussed the PG&E Wildfire Webinar regarding recent outages and efforts to stop catastrophic wildfires.

Deputy City Manager Chidester provided an update on isolated outages.

MAYOR’S ANNOUNCEMENTS OF COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICE None.

REPORT OUT FROM RECENT CLOSED SESSION MEETINGS
City Attorney Engberg reported that the Council met on September 30, 2021 and took no reportable action.

CITY MANAGER UPDATES TO COUNCIL

COASTSIDE RECOVERY
City Manager Nisbet provided an update on the Coastside Recovery Initiative including the Recovery Task Force members and its work.

1. CONSENT CALENDAR

1.A WAIVE READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES

1.B OCEAN VIEW PARK PLAYGROUND IMPROVEMENTS (CIP PROJECT 0609)

1.C ACCEPTANCE OF THE PREQUALIFIED LIST OF FIRMS FOR ON-CALL MATERIAL TESTING

AND SPECIAL INSPECTION SERVICES FOR VARIOUS CITY PROJECTS

1.D AMENDMENT OF CITYWIDE TRAFFIC REGULATIONS FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS AND

SAFETY ON CHESTERFIELD AVENUE AND PABLO COURT/ARROYO LEON DRIVE

1.E APPROVE CITY’S RESPONSE TO THE JULY 27, 2021 GRAND JURY REPORT ENTITLED “BUILDING GREATER TRUST BETWEEN COMMUNITY & LAW ENFORCEMENT VIA THE RACIAL AND IDENTITY PROFILING ACT”

1.F MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE NATIONAL SKI PATROL FOR

VOLUNTEER BIKE PATROL SERVICES

1.G RESOLUTION TO CONTINUE HOLDING PUBLIC MEETINGS REMOTELY (AB361) MOTION
Mayor Brownstone moved and Councilmember Penrose seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar. The question was called and the motion carried unanimously. 13 OCTOBER 5, 2021
City Council Minutes

2. ORDINANCES AND PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.

3. RESOLUTION AND STAFF REPORTS

3.A AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OF THE JOHN L. CARTER PARK RENOVATION PROJECT (CIP NO. 611) City Engineer Bozorginia presented the staff report.

Jon Hughes expressed enthusiasm in being part of the project.

MOTION
Councilmember Penrose moved and Councilmember Ruddock seconded a motion to adopt a resolution authorizing the Administrative Services Director to amend the FY 2021-22 Capital Budget by adding $245,000 from the unallocated capital budget to CIP Project No. 611 and authorizing the City Manager to award and execute a professional services agreement with Griffin Structures, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $245,000, for project and construction management services for the John L. Carter Park project.

The question was called and the motion carried unanimously.

3.B BUILDING ELECTRIFICATION ORDINANCE STUDY SESSION (CONTINUED) Public Works Director Doughty presented the staff report.

The Council discussed the item and asked questions of staff.

The following individuals addressed the Council:
• Tom Kabat
• Krystlyn Giedt
• Karen Wang
• Bruce Naegel
• Adrienne Etherton
The Council reviewed the Tables considered during the study session. 14 OCTOBER 5, 2021
City Council Minutes

COMMISSION / COMMITTEE UPDATES
Deputy City Manager Chidester summarized the Joint Parks and Recreation Commission / Bike and Pedestrian Advisory Committee meeting and announced the Public Art Policy would be considered by the Commission on October 27, 2021.

CITY COUNCIL REPORTS / ITEMS
Mayor Brownstone discussed the recent meeting regarding College of San Mateo resources and access in the city.

Vice Mayor Ruddock announced the One Shoreline Climate Resilience Forum on October 14, 2021.

MOTION
Councilmember Penrose moved and Vice Mayor Ruddock seconded a motion that the Council revisit the Measure D permits for Accessory Dwelling Units. The Council concurred to bring the matter back on October 2, 2021.

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Brownstone adjourned the meeting at 9:37 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted: Approved:

Jessica Blair, City Clerk Robert Brownstone, Mayor
15 MINUTES

CITY OF HALF MOON BAY CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 2021
VIRTUAL VIA ZOOM MEETING (COVID-19 PROTOCOLS)

CONVENE REGULAR MEETING / ROLL CALL
Mayor Brownstone called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. and led the pledge of allegiance.

ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Penrose, Rarback and Jimenez, Vice Mayor Ruddock, and Mayor Brownstone

PUBLIC FORUM
The following individuals addressed the Council:
• Danielle Lacampagne
• Harsh Luthra (Lee)

PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

UNITED AGAINST HATE WEEK PROCLAMATION
Mayor Brownstone presented the proclamation to Jacquelyn McCormick, Chief of Staff for Berkeley Mayor Jesse Arreguin.

Ms. McCormick discussed the creation and purpose of United Against Hate and thanked the Council and community for its support.

VETERAN’S DAY PROCLAMATION
Mayor Brownstone presented the proclamation to Public Works Superintendent Todd Seeley.

Mr. Seeley discussed the honor of serving in the Army and thanked the Council for recognizing Coastside veterans.
16 NOVEMBER 2, 2021
City Council Minutes

REIMAGINE SAMTRANS PRESENTATION
City Engineer Bozorginia introduced the item and the SAMTrans team.

Jessica Epstein and Millie Tolleson, SAMTrans, provided project background, Phase 2 outreach, recommended networking, and Phase 3 outreach.

The Council asked questions and discussed the item.

MAYOR’S ANNOUNCEMENTS OF COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICE None.

REPORT OUT FROM RECENT CLOSED SESSION MEETINGS
None.

CITY MANAGER UPDATES TO COUNCIL

IMAGINE MAGNOLIA PARK EVENT RECAP
Associate Planner Phillips provided an update on the recent Magnolia Park outreach event.

MAKE IT MAIN STREET ANNOUNCEMENT
Deputy City Manager Chidester announced an upcoming Make It Main Street event and Movies on Main Street.

FALL COMMUNITY RECYCLING EVENT ANNOUNCEMENT
Sustainability Analyst Vostinak reminded residents of the Fall Community Recycling Day on November 6, 2021, from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.

LET’S TALK HOUSING MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT
Associate Planner Cozzolino discussed the upcoming Housing Work Session on November 9, 2021, at 5 p.m.

COAST HOUSE COMMUNITY FORUM ANNOUNCEMENT
Management Analyst Gaitan announced the community forum on November 17, 2021, at 6 p.m. 17 NOVEMBER 2, 2021
City Council Minutes

ABUNDANT GRACE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CENTER
City Manager Nisbet announced the grand opening of the Abundant Grace Workforce Development Center on November 6, 2021, from 12 to 3 p.m.

TRUTH ACT FORUM
Councilmember Rarback announced the Truth Act Forum on November 3, 2021, from 6 – 8 p.m.

1. CONSENT CALENDAR

1.A WAIVE READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES

1.B RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT AND SUBMITTAL OF A GRANT APPLICATION FOR MEASURE A/W HIGHWAY PROGRAM FUNDING FOR THE HIGHWAY 1 NORTH IMPROVEMENTS (CIP NO. 538)

1.C TREASURER’S REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2021

1.D QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF FISCAL YEAR 2021-22

1.E RE-RATIFICATION OF RESOLUTION TO CONTINUE HOLDING PUBLIC MEETINGS REMOTELY (AB 361)
MOTION
Mayor Brownstone moved and Councilmember Penrose seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar. The question was called and the motion carried unanimously.

RECESS
Mayor Brownstone called a recess at 8:21 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:30 p.m. with all Councilmembers present.

2. ORDINANCES AND PUBLIC HEARINGS
2A. RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY AUTHORIZING AN EMINENT DOMAIN ACTION TO ACQUIRE

REAL PROPERTY OWNED BY CLAUDIA GULASCH, MARTHA STANGER, AND HARRIETT LEWIS (SAN MATEO COUNTY APN 056-128-070)
City Attorney Engberg presented the staff report.

MOTION
Councilmember Penrose moved and Councilmember Rarback seconded a motion to adopt by a 4/5 vote a resolution authorizing an eminent domain action to acquire the real property owned by Claudia Gulasch, as the heir to Barbara Gemanis, Martha Stagner, and Harriett Lewis (San Mateo County APN 056-128-070) (Property) located in the West of Railroad area. Acquisition of the Property is required to implement the City’s 1985 Local Coastal Land Use Plan (LUP), 1996 certified Local Coastal Program, and 2020 LUP Update by 18 NOVEMBER 2, 2021
City Council Minutes

protecting significant habitat and scenic values, providing an area for green infrastructure to control drainage and manage hazards/erosion, managing retreat of the Coastal Trail, mitigating cumulative traffic impacts through its lot retirement program, and maintaining public access and recreational opportunities in the West of Railroad area (Project); 2.

Authorize the City Attorney to deposit the amount of probable compensation in the amount of $15,000 with the court. The question was called and the motion carried unanimously.

3. RESOLUTION AND STAFF REPORTS

3.A CENSUS 2020-INFORMATIONAL UPDATE
Management Analyst Gaitain presented the staff report.

The Council asked questions of staff and discussed the item.

3.B 2021 MEASURE D ALLOCATIONS TRANSFER
Associate Planner Cozzolino and Community Development Director Ekas presented the staff report.

The following individuals addressed the Council:
• Tim Pond
• Rachel Bross
• Keith Weiner
• Belle Gorham
• Lisa Damrosch
• Daniel Lamb
• Lizzette Solis
The Council discussed the item and asked questions.

MOTION
Mayor Brownstone moved and Councilmember Ruddock seconded a motion to adopt a resolution approving a transfer of the 16 remaining Downtown base Measure D allocations, in addition to the four already transferred on September 21, 2021, comprising all of the Downtown base allocations remaining as of November 2021, to be used for new dwelling units proposed outside of the Downtown area, prioritized according to affordability, readiness, and location within the Town Center and discuss the issue of deed restrictions at the November 9, 2021 housing meeting with the Planning Commission. The question was called and the motion carried 4-0-1 (Councilmember Jimenez dissenting). 19 NOVEMBER 2, 2021
City Council Minutes

COMMISSION / COMMITTEE UPDATES
Deputy City Manager Chidester provided an update on the recent and upcoming Parks and Recreation Commission meetings.

Community Development Director Ekas provided an update on the Planning Commission.

CITY COUNCIL REPORTS / ITEMS
Councilmember Jimenez discussed the recent Day of the Dead event.

Councilmember Rarback requested consideration of a resolution requiring full vaccination for anybody working for the City within city limits including contractors and Sheriff’s Department personnel. Councilmember Penrose concurred.

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Brownstone adjourned the meeting at 10:23 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted: Approved:

Jessica Blair, City Clerk Robert Brownstone, Mayor
20 MINUTES

CITY OF HALF MOON BAY CITY COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION JOINT MEETING TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 2021
VIRTUAL VIA ZOOM MEETING (COVID-19 PROTOCOLS)

CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL
Mayor Brownstone called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m.

ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Jimenez, Penrose (arrived at 5:08 p.m.) and Rarback, Vice Mayor Ruddock, Mayor Brownstone, Planning Commission Chair Ruddock, Vice Chair Polgar, Commissioners Benjamin and Gorn
ABSENT: Commissioner Hernandez

1. SPECIAL WORK SESSION: CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION

1.A. WORK SESSION- HOUSING SITES AND MEASURE D
City Manager Nisbet introduced the item.

Community Development Director Ekas and Associate Planner Cozzolino presented the staff report including affordable housing, Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), and potential housing sites - Town Center, Farmworker, Planned Development, Mobile Home Parks, and Public Owned.

The following individuals addressed the City Council:
• Sean McPhetridge
• Jack Hebb
• Mike Ferreira
• Ana Gonzalez
• Raayan Modashemi
• Greg Jamison
• Joann Rokosky
• Dora
21 November 9, 2021
City Council Minutes

• Jose Avila
• Ariana Vidrio
• Alice
• Belinda Arriage
• Juana Ruano
• Carmen Avila
• Guadalupe Cacho
• Lizet Cortes
• Judy Taylor
• Angeles Avila
• Omar Garcia
• Carolina Sandoval
• Maria Avila
• Juan
• Miguel Antonio
• Francisca Villalobos
• Cristy Velasquez
RECESS
Mayor Brownstone called a recess at 7:05 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 7:21 p.m. with all Councilmembers and Planning Commissioners present, except Commissioner Hernandez.

The Planning Commission and City Council discussed the item.

RECESS
Mayor Brownstone called a recess at 8:49 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:56 p.m. with all Councilmembers and Planning Commissioners present, except Commissioner Hernandez.

Community Development Director Ekas and Associate Planner Cozzolino presented the staff report on Measure D implementation challenges.

The Commission and Council asked questions of staff.

The following individuals addressed the City Council:
• Judy Taylor
• Raayan Modashemi
• Jack Hebb
• Mike Ferreira
• Dora
22 November 9, 2021
City Council Minutes

Councilmember Rarback left the meeting at 9:50 p.m.

The Commission and Council discussed Measure D.

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Brownstone adjourned the meeting at 10:13 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted: Approved:

Jessica Blair, City Clerk Robert Brownstone, Mayor
23 MINUTES

CITY OF HALF MOON BAY CITY COUNCIL

SPECIAL MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2021
VIRTUAL VIA ZOOM MEETING (COVID-19 PROTOCOLS)

CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL
Mayor Brownstone called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Penrose, Rarback and Jimenez, Vice Mayor Ruddock, and Mayor Brownstone

1. SPECIAL MEETING – COASTSIDE RECOVERY INITIATIVE
Senior Management Analyst Decker and Project Consultant Wood provided an update on the Coastside Recovery Initiative including goals, guiding principles, process overview, task force, milestones and timeline, accomplishments, and recommendations.

Gopi Mattel, Task Force Member, discussed his experience and applauded the City for supporting the initiative.

Deputy City Manager Chidester read comments from the owners of the Barn Restaurant in Half Moon Bay and Nic Erridge, Pescadero Municipal Advisory Council and South Coast resident.

Sophia Layne, Task Force Member, discussed her service on the Task Force, particularly Team Integrate.

City Manager Nisbet and Deputy City Manager Chidester discussed structure and resource considerations.

The following individuals addressed the Council:
• Sandra Winter
• Krystylyn Giedt
• Belinda Arriaga
24 NOVEMBER 16, 2021
Special City Council Minutes

The Council discussed the item.

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Brownstone adjourned the meeting at 7:03 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted: Approved:

Jessica Blair, City Clerk Robert Brownstone, Mayor
25 MINUTES

CITY OF HALF MOON BAY CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2021
VIRTUAL VIA ZOOM MEETING (COVID-19 PROTOCOLS)

CONVENE REGULAR MEETING / ROLL CALL
Mayor Brownstone called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and led the pledge of allegiance.

ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Penrose, Rarback and Jimenez, Vice Mayor Ruddock, and Mayor Brownstone

PUBLIC FORUM
The following individuals addressed the Council:
• Virginia
• Terry Lehigh

PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

MIDCOAST COMMUNITY COUNCIL UPDATE
Clare Toutant provided an update on recent activities of the Midcoast Community Council.

COLLEGE OF SAN MATEO PRESENTATION
Dr. Jennifer Taylor-Mendoza, President, and Lisa Petrides, Board of Trustees, provided an update on the College of San Mateo including shared priorities, connecting to the Coastside, Promise Scholars Program, data on students, support during the pandemic, and shared challenges.

The Council discussed the item.

MAYOR’S ANNOUNCEMENTS OF COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICE None.

REPORT OUT FROM RECENT CLOSED SESSION MEETINGS
26 NOVEMBER 16, 2021
City Council Minutes

None.

CITY MANAGER UPDATES TO COUNCIL
None.

1. CONSENT CALENDAR

1.A WAIVE READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES

1.B WARRANTS FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 2021

1.C APPROVAL OF MINUTES

1.D RE-RATIFICATION OF RESOLUTION TO CONTINUE HOLDING PUBLIC MEETINGS REMOTELY (AB 361)

1.E ADOPTION OF CALTRANS LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROCEDURES MANUAL (LAPM) CHAPTER 10: CONSULTANT SELECTION
MOTION
Mayor Brownstone moved and Councilmember Rarback seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar. The question was called and the motion carried unanimously.

2. ORDINANCES AND PUBLIC HEARINGS
2A. BUILDING ELECTRIFICATION ORDINANCE
Sustainability Analyst Vostinak presented the staff report.

Mayor Brownstone opened the public hearing.

The following individuals addressed the Council:
• Steve Fineman
• Terry Nagel
• Paul Gregorieff
• Linda Hutchins Knowles
• Linda Acosta Anderson
• Monet
• Tony Angelli
• Kurt Common
• Michelle Arias
• Joy Alfia
• Jack Hebb
27 NOVEMBER 16, 2021
City Council Minutes

• Bill Balson
• Les Deman • Bruce Nagel • Hunter McDivit
t
• Frank Mento • Frank Gerrity • Dorene Gerrity • Adrienne Etherton • Elijah Leary • Lauren Weston • Suzanne Emmerson • Natasha Elliot • David Dalton • Jim Cedrow • Anne Fleming • Crystal Wickham • Virginia Terzian • Allen Stromeyer • Tom Kabat • Terry Leighigh • Kevin Stidemeyer • Dave Eblovi • Joe Fullerton • Scott Shell • Mr. Wonderful • Diane Bailey • Gina Azari • Dave Shore • Penny Marshal • Karen Wang • Jared Johnson • Vic Birelli • Lance Amatto • Robert Whitehair • Sven Tisom • Gina Bay • John Ullom • Sean Armstrong • Elsa Shafer • Brianna Duarte 28 NOVEMBER 16, 2021
City Council Minutes

RECESS
Mayor Brownstone called a recess at 9:43 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:50 p.m. with all Councilmembers present.

The Council asked questions of staff, discussed the provisions of the proposed ordinance and provided direction to staff.

MOTION
Mayor Brownstone moved and Councilmember Ruddock seconded a motion to continue the hearing to December 7, 2021. The question was called and the motion carried unanimously.
2B. ELECTRIC VEHICLE AND PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM REACH CODES FOR 2019 ENERGY CODE MOTION
Mayor Brownstone moved and Councilmember Ruddock seconded a motion to continue the hearing to December 7, 2021. The question was called and the motion carried unanimously.

3. RESOLUTION AND STAFF REPORTS

3.A VACCINATIONS
The item was continued to December 7, 2021.

COMMISSION / COMMITTEE UPDATES
None.

CITY COUNCIL REPORTS / ITEMS
None.

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Brownstone adjourned the meeting at 11:25 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted: Approved:

Jessica Blair, City Clerk Robert Brownstone, Mayor
29 MINUTES

CITY OF HALF MOON BAY CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2021
VIRTUAL VIA ZOOM MEETING (COVID-19 PROTOCOLS)

CONVENE SPECIAL MEETING
Mayor Brownstone called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Penrose, Rarback and Jimenez, Vice Mayor Ruddock, and Mayor Brownstone

OPEN SESSION IDENTIFICATION OF CLOSED SESSION ITEMS

PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS

CLOSED SESSION
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—EXISTING LITIGATION (Govt. Code section 54956.9(d)(1)) Name of case: City of Half Moon Bay v. Granada CSD and Montara WSD, et al., - San Clara Superior Court Civil No. 17CIV316927

ADJOURN SPECIAL MEETING
Mayor Brownstone adjourned the special meeting at 6:00 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted: Approved:

Jessica Blair, City Clerk Robert Brownstone, Mayor
30 MINUTES

CITY OF HALF MOON BAY CITY COUNCIL

SPECIAL MEETING
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2021
VIRTUAL VIA ZOOM MEETING (COVID-19 PROTOCOLS)

CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL
Mayor Brownstone called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Penrose, Rarback and Jimenez, Vice Mayor Ruddock, and Mayor Brownstone

PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

CONNECT THE COASTSIDE
Supervisor Don Horsley and Chanda Singh provided an overview of Connect the Coastside.

The Council asked questions and discussed the item.

CITY MANAGER UPDATES
City Manager Nisbet announced the purpose of the placeholder vaccination item on the Regular meeting agenda. He clarified misinformation on the Poplar Complete Street Project.

City Engineer Bozorginia announced closures on Highway 92 for PG&E work.

1. RESOLUTIONS AND STAFF REPORTS

1.A. PUBLIC ART POLICY
Deputy City Manager Chidester and Management Analyst Gaitan presented the staff report.

The Council asked questions of staff and discussed the item. 31 DECEMBER 7, 2021
Special City Council Minutes

MOTION
Councilmember Ruddock moved and Councilmember Rarback seconded a motion to adopt a resolution adopting the City of Half Moon Bay Public Art Policy, which provides procedures for the City to manage the funding, commission, submission, evaluation, acceptance, or denial of public art, as well as its installation, maintenance, and if necessary, removal. The question was called and the motion carried unanimously.

1.B. VACCINATIONS
Administrative Services Director Lopez presented the staff report.

The following individuals addressed the Council:
• David Eblovi
• Stacy Sabol
• Angela Bolten
The Council discussed the item.

MOTION
Councilmember Rarback moved and Councilmember Penrose seconded a motion to require that anyone working for the City within city limits be fully vaccinated, including contractors and Sheriff’s Department personnel. The question was called and the motion carried 4-1, Councilmember Ruddock dissenting.

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Brownstone adjourned the meeting at 7:15 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted: Approved:

Jessica Blair, City Clerk Robert Brownstone, Mayor
32 MINUTES

CITY OF HALF MOON BAY CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2021
VIRTUAL VIA ZOOM MEETING (COVID-19 PROTOCOLS)

CONVENE REGULAR MEETING / ROLL CALL
Mayor Brownstone called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m.

ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Penrose, Rarback and Jimenez, Vice Mayor Ruddock, and Mayor Brownstone

PUBLIC FORUM
The following individuals addressed the Council:
• Aisha Baro
• Mr. Wonderful
• Krystlyn Giedt
• Brian and Laura Wilson
MAYOR’S ANNOUNCEMENTS OF COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICE None.

REPORT OUT FROM RECENT CLOSED SESSION MEETINGS
City Attorney Engberg reported that the Council met in Closed Session and took no reportable action.

1. CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Jimenez pulled Item 1.C - 2022 Residential Dwelling Unit Allocation Pursuant to Half Moon Bay Municipal Code Chapter 17.06 (Measure D). He requested a comparison of the number of ADU locations in 2020, 2021 and 2022. Community Development Director Ekas discussed data points. Associate Planner Cozzolino provided the number of 2020 and 2021 ADUs.

1.A WAIVE READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
33 DECEMBER 7, 2021
City Council Minutes

1.B RE-RATIFICATION OF RESOLUTION TO CONTINUE HOLDING PUBLIC MEETINGS REMOTELY (AB 361)

1.C 2022 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNIT ALLOCATION PURSUANT TO HALF MOON BAY MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 17.06 (MEASURE D)

1.D SAN MATEO COUNTY LOCAL MULTIJURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2021

1.E FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HDL

COMPANIES FOR BUSINESS LICENSE AND TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX

ADMINISTRATION AND COLLECTION

1.F FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE OCEAN COLONY FORCE MAIN AND PUMP STATION PROJECT (CIP NO. 9025)

1.G ACKNOWLEDGING COMPLETION OF THE SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS AND ACCEPTANCE FOR THE CITY’S OWNERSHIP AND THE RESPONSIBILITY TO MAINTAIN THE

SANITARY SEWER MAIN CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE PUBLIC EASEMENT IN THE CARNOUSTIE PHASE 4 SUBDIVISION

1.H HIGHWAY 1 SAFETY AND OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS SOUTH PROJECT (CIP NO. 523) MOTION
Mayor Brownstone moved and Councilmember Penrose seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar, with the exception of Item 1.C. The question was called and the motion carried unanimously.

MOTION
Mayor Brownstone moved and Councilmember Penrose seconded a motion to adopt a resolution setting the 2022 Residential Dwelling Unit Allocation and Administration System pursuant to Half Moon Bay Municipal Code Chapter 17.06 for 69 residential dwelling units, 46 units for the Downtown and 23 units outside of the Downtown. The question was called and the motion carried unanimously.

2. ORDINANCES AND PUBLIC HEARINGS

2.A MANDATORY ORGANICS WASTE DISPOSAL REDUCTION ORDINANCE Public Works Program Manager Chong presented the staff report.

Mayor Brownstone opened the public hearing.

The following individuals addressed the Council:
• John Ullom
• Paul Grigorieff
• Krystlyn Giedt
34 DECEMBER 7, 2021
City Council Minutes

Public Works Director Doughty responded to comments from the public.

There being no additional speakers, Mayor Brownstone closed the public hearing.

The Council asked questions of staff and discussed the item.

MOTION
Councilmember Ruddock moved and Councilmember Rarback seconded a motion to waive first reading, and introduce an ordinance: a. Confirming without re-enacting previous repeal of Chapter 7.20 entitled “Garbage and Rubbish Disposal” in its entirely effective July 1, 2011; b. Repealing existing Chapter 7.21 entitled “Mandatory Solid Waste Collection Service”; c. Adopting a new Chapter 7.20 entitled “Solid Waste Collection, Recycling and Disposal”; and d. Adopting a new Chapter 7.21 entitled, “Edible Food Recovery.” The question was called and the motion carried unanimously.

RECESS
Mayor Brownstone called a recess at 8:20 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:25 p.m. with all Councilmembers present.
2B. BUILDING ELECTRIFICATION ORDINANCE
Sustainability Analyst Vostinak presented the staff report.

Mayor Brownstone opened the public hearing.

The following individuals addressed the Council:
• Joe Fullerton
• Dashiell Leeds
• John Ullom
• Ben Granholm
• Terry Leighey
• Adrienne Etherton
• Natasha Elliot
• Robert Whitehair
• Bruce Negal
• Mr. Wonderful
• Paul Grigorieff
There being no additional speakers, Mayor Brownstone closed the public hearing.

The Council asked questions of staff and discussed the item. 35 DECEMBER 7, 2021
City Council Minutes

MOTION
Councilmember Penrose moved and Councilmember Rarback seconded a motion to introduce an ordinance adopting a new chapter 14.06 to the Half Moon Bay Municipal Code entitled “Electrification of Buildings." The questioned was called and the motion carried 3-2, Mayor Brownstone and Councilmember Jimenez dissenting.

2.C ELECTRIC VEHICLE AND PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM REACH CODES FOR 2019 ENERGY CODE Sustainability Analyst Vostinak presented the staff report.

Mayor Brownstone opened the public hearing.

The following individuals addressed the Council:
• Adrienne Etherton
• Paul Grigorieff
• Bruce Negal
• Mr. Wonderful
• Robert Whitehair
There being no additional speakers, Mayor Brownstone closed the public hearing.

The Council asked questions of staff and discussed the item.

MOTION
Councilmember Penrose moved and Councilmember Rarback seconded a motion to introduce an ordinance repealing and replacing Chapter 14.04.040 and Chapter 14.04.120 of the Half Moon Bay Municipal Code to expand the requirements for photovoltaic systems in new non-residential buildings, require pre-wiring for back up battery storage and expand electric vehicle charging requirements in new residential buildings. The question was called and the motion carried unanimously.

3. RESOLUTION AND STAFF REPORTS

3.A VACCINATIONS
Council action was taken on this item during the December 7, 2021 Special meeting at 6:00 p.m.

The following individuals addressed the Council:
36 DECEMBER 7, 2021
City Council Minutes

• John Ullom
• David Eblovi

COMMISSION / COMMITTEE UPDATES
None.

CITY COUNCIL REPORTS / ITEMS
Councilmember Ruddock discussed SB9 regarding subdivision of existing lots and requested a discussion on how the City would implement SB9.

Councilmember Jimenez discussed the success of Night of Lights.

Mayor Brownstone thanked the Council for allowing him to serve as Mayor.

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Brownstone adjourned the meeting at 10:05 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted: Approved:

Jessica Blair, City Clerk Robert Brownstone, Mayor
37 MINUTES

CITY OF HALF MOON BAY CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 21, 2021
VIRTUAL VIA ZOOM MEETING (COVID-19 PROTOCOLS)

CONVENE REGULAR MEETING / ROLL CALL
Mayor Brownstone called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and led the pledge of allegiance.

ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Penrose, Rarback and Jimenez, Vice Mayor Ruddock, and Mayor Brownstone

PUBLIC FORUM
The following individuals addressed the Council:
• David Eblovi
• Krystlyn Giedt
• Mary Bernier
• Aisha Baro
2021 STATE OF THE CITY PRESENTATION

VIDEO PRESENTATION BY MAYOR BROWNSTONE, COASTSIDE CHAMBER CEO KRYSTLYN GIEDT,

AND HMB LIBRARY MANAGER ANNIE MALLEY
The 2021 State of the City video was shown.

CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION

REMARKS BY OUTGOING MAYOR
Mayor Brownstone discussed the highlights of his term as Mayor and thanked the Council for its support.

PUBLIC REMARKS - OUTGOING MAYOR
The following individuals addressed the Council:
38 DECEMBER 21, 2021
City Council Minutes

• Katrina Rill, representing Congresswoman Jackie Speier • Joan Dentler, representing Senator Josh Becker
• Leslie Bulbuk, representing Assemblymember Marc Berman Vice Mayor Ruddock commended Mayor Brownstone and presented a gavel plaque for his service as Mayor.

SELECTION OF MAYOR FOR 2022
MOTION
Mayor Brownstone moved and Councilmember Rarback seconded a motion to nominate Debbie Ruddock to serve as Mayor. The question was called and the motion carried unanimously.

SELECTION OF VICE MAYOR FOR 2022
MOTION
Mayor Ruddock moved and Councilmember Rarback seconded a motion to nominate Deborah Penrose to serve as Vice Mayor. The question was called and the motion carried unanimously.

REMARKS BY INCOMING MAYOR
Mayor Ruddock discussed her upcoming term as Mayor and suggested the Council focus on mental health awareness and community care and connection.

REMARKS BY INCOMING VICE MAYOR
Vice Mayor Penrose expressed her enthusiasm for serving as Vice Mayor for the coming year.

Councilmember Rarback and Councilmember Jimenez thanked Councilmember Brownstone for his service as Mayor and expressed enthusiasm for the coming year.

PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
COASTSIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY 30TH ANNIVERSARY PROCLAMATION Mayor Ruddock read the proclamation acknowledging the Coastside Jewish Community (CJC) 30th Anniversary.

Deputy City Manager Chidester displayed the proclamation and certificates of recognition from Assembly, Senate, and County representatives.
39 DECEMBER 21, 2021
City Council Minutes

Sharon Turner, President of CJC, thanked the Council for its recognition.

MIDCOAST COMMUNITY COUNCIL UPDATE
Claire Toutant provided an update on the Midcoast Community Council.

HALF MOON BAY LIBRARY ANNUAL PRESENTATION
Deputy City Manager Chidester discussed library services.

Half Moon Bay Library Manager Annie Malley provided the San Mateo County Libraries Annual Report.

MAYOR’S ANNOUNCEMENTS OF COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICE None.

REPORT OUT FROM RECENT CLOSED SESSION MEETINGS
None.

CITY MANAGER UPDATES TO COUNCIL
City Manager Nisbet congratulated Mayor Ruddock on her retirement from the State Coastal Conservancy.

1. CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Ruddock pulled items 1.H and 1.J for individual consideration.

The consent calendar consisted of the following items:

1.A WAIVE READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES

1.B WARRANTS FOR THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER 2021

1.C 2022 CALENDAR OF CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS

1.D AB1600 REPORT ON DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021

1.E ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT (ACFR) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021

1.F ACCEPTANCE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOCAL ASSISTANCE SPECIFIED GRANT FOR THE JOHN L. CARTER PARK RENOVATION PROJECT (CIP NO. 0611)

1.G RE-RATIFICATION OF RESOLUTION TO CONTINUE HOLDING PUBLIC MEETINGS 40 DECEMBER 21, 2021
City Council Minutes

REMOTELY (AB 361)

1.I ELECTRIC VEHICLE AND PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM REACH CODES FOR 2019 ENERGY CODESECOND READING MOTION
Councilmember Jimenez moved and Councilmember Rarback seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar, with the exception of Items 1.H and 1.J. The question was called and the motion carried unanimously.

The following items were pulled from the Consent Calendar for individual consideration:

1.J MANDATORY ORGANICS WASTE DISPOSAL REDUCTION ORDINANCE AND SOLID WASTE CODE UPDATE – SECOND READING
Public Works Director Doughty presented the staff report.

The following individuals addressed the Council:
• Paul Grigorieff
MOTION
Vice Mayor Penrose moved and Councilmember Brownstone seconded a motion to waive second reading and adopt an ordinance: 1) confirming without re-enacting previous repeal of Chapter 7.20 entitled “Garbage and Rubbish Disposal” in its entirety effective July 1, 2011; 2) repealing existing Chapter 7.21 entitled “Mandatory Solid Waste Collection Service”; 3:
adopting a new Chapter 7.20 entitled “Solid Waste Collection, Recycling and Disposal”; and 4) adopting a new Chapter 7.21 entitled, “Edible Food Recovery.” The question was called and the motion carried unanimously.

RECESS
Mayor Ruddock called a recess at 8:34 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:39 p.m. with all Councilmembers present.

1.H ORDINANCE AMENDING THE HALF MOON BAY MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD A NEW CHAPTER “ELECTRIFICATION OF BUILDINGS” – SECOND READING The following individuals addressed the Council:
• Jeff Hamilton
• Paul Grigorieff
• Les Deman
• Terri Lahey
41 DECEMBER 21, 2021
City Council Minutes

• Matthyse
• Bruce Nagel
• Adrienne Etherton
• Aisha Baro
• David Eblovi
• Francesca Civoli
• Harry Quackenboss
• Tom Kabat
The Council discussed the item.

MOTION
Councilmember Brownstone moved and Councilmember Jimenez seconded a motion to bring back an ordinance at the February 1, 2022 Council meeting removing all remodels, including only new construction for commercial and residential and providing an exemption for agriculture, wastewater treatment plant. The question was called and the motion carried 4-1, Vice Mayor Penrose dissenting.

2. ORDINANCES AND PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.

3. RESOLUTION AND STAFF REPORTS

3.A SOUTH SEA LEVEL RISE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS
Public Works Director Doughty presented the staff report.

Hilary Papendick, Climate Change Program Manager, San Mateo County South Coast Office of Sustainability, presented the Sea Level Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Plan.

The Council asked questions of staff and discussed the item.

MOTION
Councilmember Brownstone moved and Councilmember Jimenez seconded a motion to direct staff to return to the City Council on January 19, 2022 with an amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Integral Consulting, Inc. and funding proposal for Phase 2 (adaptation strategies in the Ocean Colony area). The question was called and the motion carried unanimously.

COMMISSION / COMMITTEE UPDATES
None.
42 DECEMBER 21, 2021
City Council Minutes

CITY COUNCIL REPORTS / ITEMS
Mayor Ruddock stated she was reappointed by CCAG as the coastal rep to One Shore Line.

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Brownstone adjourned the meeting at 10:36 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted: Approved:

Jessica Blair, City Clerk Debbie Ruddock, Mayor
43 MINUTES

CITY OF HALF MOON BAY CITY COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 19, 2022
VIRTUAL VIA ZOOM MEETING (COVID-19 PROTOCOLS)

CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL
Mayor Ruddock called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. and led the pledge of allegiance.

ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Councilmembers Brownstone, Jimenez, and Rarback, and Jimenez, Vice Mayor Penrose, and Mayor Ruddock

PUBLIC FORUM
The following individuals addressed the Council:
• Gregg Dieguez
• Ellen Hage
• David Eblovi

PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS

VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION - DYLAN RAGOZIN (COASTSIDE AYSO)
Mayor Ruddock thanked Mr. Ragozin for his dedication to the community. Mr. Ragozin expressed gratitude for the ability to continue with the soccer season.

NATIONAL SLAVERY AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING PREVENTION MONTH PROCLAMATION Mayor Ruddock presented the proclamation to Pamela Estes, County Human Trafficking Division.

Ms. Estes discussed the Human Trafficking program.

MIDCOAST COMMUNITY COUNCIL UPDATE
None.
44 JANUARY 19, 2022
City Council Minutes

MAYOR’S ANNOUNCEMENTS OF COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICE Mayor Ruddock reminded residents that they could order free COVID-19 test kits.

SERVICE REPORT OUT FROM RECENT CLOSED SESSION MEETINGS
City Attorney Engberg reported that the Council met in Closed Session and took no reportable action. She discussed the Sewer Authority Mid-Coastside lawsuit, indicated a tentative ruling, reconsideration, and expected final decision in the next 90 days.

CITY MANAGER UPDATES TO COUNCIL

INTRODUCTION OF CAPTAIN ANDY ARMANDO
City Manager Nisbet introduced Captain Andy Armando.

COVID-19 UPDATE
Deputy City Manager Chidester provided an update on the mask mandate, San Mateo County data, vaccinations, and testing.

SMITH FIELD SURVEY ANNOUNCEMENT
Public Works Doughty provided an update and encouraged residents take the survey.

FEDERAL INFRASTRUCTURE ACT UPDATE
Andres Ramirez and Ben Goldeen, Townsend Public Affairs, presented information on the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.

1. CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Jimenez pulled Item 1.D – Mayor’s List of Council Representatives.

1.A WAIVE READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES

1.B WARRANTS FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER 2021

1.C RE-RATIFICATION OF RESOLUTION TO CONTINUE HOLDING PUBLIC MEETINGS REMOTELY (AB 361)

1.E ESTABLISH THE CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY SCHEDULE FOR ASSISTANT CITY CLERK

1.F FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE POPLAR PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY PROJECT (CIP NO. 1003)

1.G RECEIPT OF LEGISLATIVE POSITION LETTERS
45 JANUARY 19, 2022
City Council Minutes

MOTION
Councilmember Brownstone moved and Councilmember Rarback seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar, with the exception of Item 1.D. The question was called and the motion carried unanimously.

The following item was pulled from the Consent Calendar for individual consideration:

1.D MAYOR’S LIST OF CITY COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES AND DESIGNATED ASSIGNMENTS FOR 2022 Councilmember Jimenez requested appointment as the Homeless Liaison. Councilmember Rarback conceded to Councilmember Jimenez.

MOTION
Councilmember Penrose moved and Councilmember Rarback seconded a motion to accept the assignments as amended. The question was called the motion carried unanimously.

RECESS
Mayor Rudock called a recess at 8:01 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:14 p.m. with all Councilmembers present.

2. ORDINANCES AND PUBLIC HEARINGS

2.A PUBLIC HEARING TO REVIEW REDISTRICTING FOCUS MAPS (8:15 PM) Communications Director / City Clerk Blair, Redistricting Advisory Committee Chair Holt and Vice Chair Gater, and Shalice Tilton, Consultant, presented the staff report.

Mayor Ruddock opened the public hearing.

The following individuals addressed the Council:
• Hal Bogner
• David Eblovi
• Claudia Marshall
• Bill Balson
• Sandra Winter
• Michal Settles
• Jan Hanson
• James Benjamin
• Joyce Logan
There being no additional speakers, Mayor Ruddock closed the public hearing. 46 JANUARY 19, 2022
City Council Minutes

RECESS
Mayor Rudock called a recess at 9:21 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:25 p.m. with all Councilmembers present.

The Council asked questions, discussed the maps, and offered the following opinions:

Vice Mayor Penrose suggested four districts for less division and indicated her preference of Map 403b.

Councilmember Rarback indicated support for five districts and Map 504c.

Councilmember Brownstone concurred with Councilmember Rarback on five districts and Map 504c.

Councilmember Jimenez also supported five districts and Map 504c.

Mayor Ruddock discussed the survey results and her preference for four districts. The Council provided its consideration of the public survey. Mayor Ruddock suggested obtaining more input on Maps 504c and 402 with a two-year mayor.

MOTION
Councilmember Brownstone moved and Councilmember Jimenez seconded a motion to direct staff to bring back an ordinance adopting Map 504c. The question was called and the motion carried 3-2, Mayor Ruddock and Vice Mayor Penrose dissenting. 2B. INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING HALF MOON BAY MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 15 – SIGN ORDINANCE
City Attorney Engberg presented the staff report.

Mayor Ruddock opened the public hearing. There being no speakers, Mayor Ruddock closed the public hearing.

MOTION
Vice Mayor Penrose moved and Councilmember Brownstone seconded a motion to introduce on first reading an ordinance amending portions of Title 15 of the Half Moon Bay Municipal Code relating to signs and advertising structures. The question was called and the motion carried unanimously.

3. RESOLUTION AND STAFF REPORTS

3.A AGREEMENT WITH EL CENTRO DE LIBERTAD FOR COMMUNITY RESPONDER PILOT

PROGRAM
47 JANUARY 19, 2022
City Council Minutes

City Manager Nisbet, Deputy City Manager Chidester, and Jeff Essex, El Centro de Libertad, presented the report.

The Council asked questions and discussed the item.

MOTION
Councilmember Brownstone moved and Councilmember Rarback seconded a motion to adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to finalize and execute an agreement with El Centro de Libertad for a Community Responder pilot program, at a cost not-to-exceed $150,000, for a term beginning March 1, 2022, and ending September 30, 2022.

COMMISSION / COMMITTEE UPDATES
None.

CITY COUNCIL REPORTS / ITEMS
Mayor Ruddock encouraged the Council to report on their outside committee meetings.

Mayor Ruddock indicated she was recused from the Poplar Project item and left the meeting at 10:39 p.m.

COMMUNICATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL
POPLAR PROJECT CDP MEMO – CITY MANAGER
City Manager Nisbet and Public Works Director Doughty presented the report.

The following individuals addressed the Council:
• Hilary Stamper
• David Eblovi
• James Benjamin
The Council discussed the item and agreed refer the matter back to the Planning Commission.

ADJOURNMENT
Vice Mayor Penrose adjourned the meeting at 11:16 p.m.
48 JANUARY 19, 2022
City Council Minutes

Respectfully Submitted: Approved:

Jessica Blair, City Clerk Debbie Ruddock, Mayor
49

BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY

AGENDA REPORT
For meeting of: February 15, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
VIA: Bob Nisbet, City Manager
FROM: Jessica Blair, Communications Director / City Clerk TITLE: BUILDING ELECTRIFICATION ORDINANCE – SECOND READING ______________________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION:

Waive second reading and adopt an ordinance adopting a new chapter 14.06 to the Half Moon Bay Municipal Code entitled “Electrification of Buildings.” FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with the adoption of this ordinance.

STRATEGIC ELEMENT:

This action supports the Inclusive Governance Elements of the Strategic Plan.

DISCUSSION:

On February 1, 2022, the City Council introduced the ordinance following the conduct of a dulynoticed public hearing. As required by law, the ordinance appears for second reading and adoption at a regular meeting more than five days past introduction.

ATTACHMENT:

Ordinance adopting a new chapter 14.06 to the Half Moon Bay Municipal Code entitled “Electrification of Buildings”
50 ORDINANCE NO. C-2022-____

ORDINANCE AMENDING THE HALF MOON BAY MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD A NEW CHAPTER

14.06 TO TITLE 14 ENTITLED “ELECTRIFICATION OF BUILDINGS” THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Findings. The City Council of the City of Half Moon Bay hereby adds a new Chapter 14.06 (“Electrification of Buildings”) to Title 14 of the Half Moon Bay Municipal Code.

The City Council finds and declares as follows:
(a) Health and Safety Code Section 18941.5, with reference to Section 17958.7, allows for more restrictive local amendments to the current California Building Standards Code (“Building Codes”) that are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions.
(b) The Half Moon Bay City Council expressly declares that these proposed amendments to the Building Codes are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, topographical, and geological conditions, and hereby adopts the findings of reasonable necessity as set forth in Attachment A accompanying this ordinance.
(c) Express findings that these modifications to the Building Codes are reasonably necessary are hereby made and will be filed with the California Building Standards Commission in accordance with California Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7 before this ordinance takes effect.
(d) Failure to address and significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions could result in rises in sea level that could put at risk Half Moon Bay homes and businesses, public facilities, and portions of major local and regional transportation infrastructure. (e) Due to changes in rainfall patterns expected with climate change, the City of Half Moon Bay is likely to be subject to more severe weather events, including droughts as well as more intense storms that increase the risks of, and have actually resulted in, extreme wildfires, erosion, overland local flooding and landslides.
(f) It is expected that climate change will result in further severe and frequent extreme heat events, intensifying local heat islands and putting vulnerable populations at health risk, which has already occurred at unprecedented levels with sea level rise and widespread wildfires in the area.
(g) In 2016, the State of California enacted Senate Bill (SB) 32 to require greenhouse gas emissions to be reduced to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. 51 (h) In 2018, Governor Brown signed Executive Order (EO) B-55-18 which calls for California to achieve carbon neutrality as soon as possible, and no later than 2045. (i) The City of Half Moon Bay is preparing its Climate Action and Adaptation Plan to, at minimum meet State emissions goals established in SB32 and EO B-55-18. (j) Based upon the latest available data, 48 percent of Half Moon Bay’s local greenhouse gas emissions came from buildings, with 80 percent of that total coming from onsite Fuel Gas combustion.
(k) The City Council has identified electrifying buildings as a necessary strategy to achieve the City’s 2030 and 2045 greenhouse gas reduction targets. (l) Half Moon Bay primarily receives electricity from Peninsula Clean Energy, whose electricity portfolio is 100% carbon free as of January 2021, prioritizing local renewable generation and local green jobs development.
(m) Onsite Fuel Gas combustion is known to lead to elevated levels of harmful indoor air pollutants that disproportionately affect frontline communities, including people of color, immigrants, indigenous communities, low-income people, those with disabilities, and the unhoused.
(n) The indoor air pollutants that arise from onsite Fuel Gas combustion have been shown to contribute to respiratory ailments such as asthma, such that children living in homes with gas cooking are 42 percent more likely to have asthma.
(o) Fuel Gasinfrastructure and pipelines contribute to the risk of fires and explosions such as the 2010 San Bruno pipeline explosion, with the risk magnified in cases of major earthquakes. (p) Climate disruption is being fueled by the burning of fossil fuels, including “natural gas,” oil, and coal, and the disruption is already having devastating impacts on those who can least afford it and are least responsible for the problem.
(q) Requiring all newly constructed buildings to be all-electric will create the groundwork for clean energy technologies to proliferate and become cost-competitive and provide the impetus for workforce development in clean energy technologies and building electrification retrofits.
(r) Highly efficient buildings enhance Half Moon Bay’s public health, welfare, and resiliency by promoting environmental and economic health and safety through the design, construction, maintenance, and operation of buildings.
(s) It is reasonably necessary to require buildings to produce renewable, low-carbon electricity and to reduce energy consumption through efficient design in order to reduce the 52 effects of climate change (which have already been experienced locally through sea level rise and wildfires), reduce regional pollution, improve overall safety, and improve resilience to climate change.
(t) Costs for all-electric new construction have been shown to be on par with or less than those for mixed-fuel construction in the Half Moon Bay climate zone. (u) On February 2, 2021, the City Council conducted a study session on Building Electrification and directed staff to prepare a draft ordinance for consideration by the community and City Council.
(v) The requirements specified in this Ordinance were the subject of stakeholder outreach from June through September 2021, including public meetings and individual stakeholder interviews.
(w) On September 25 and October 5, 2021, the City Council conducted additional study sessions to provide policy guidance on the draft Building Electrification ordinance. (x) Half Moon Bay can help lead the climate change movement by implementing climate solutions to benefit all people in our community, particularly those that have been disadvantaged by air pollution and other environmental harms in our most vulnerable communities.

Section 2. Addition of Chapter 14.06 to Title 14 of the HALF MOON BAY Municipal Code.

The Half Moon Bay Municipal Code is hereby amended with the addition of Chapter 14.06, “Electrification of Buildings,” which is adopted as set forth in Attachment B. Attachment B of this Ordinance is incorporated herein in its entirety.

Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance.

The City Council herby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and adopted this Ordinance and each section, sentence, clause, or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 4. California Environmental Quality Act. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) on the grounds that the standards contained therein are more stringent than those set forth in the State Building Standards Code, and as a result there are no reasonably foreseeable adverse impacts or possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. Given Half Moon Bay’s clean energy sources, this Ordinance’s provisions requiring a shift from fuel gas to electricity will not have any significant effect on the environment. In particular, all Half Moon Bay energy customers are automatically enrolled in the Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE) EcoPlus 53 Service, which provides 100% Carbon Free Electricity. PCE generates electricity from 50% renewable sources, and all customers may opt into PCE’s Eco100 tier, which generates energy from 100% renewable sources. There is no reasonable possibility that increasing the City’s reliance on these clean and renewable energy sources could have a significant effect on the environment. The Ordinance is also exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guidelines section 15308, because it is a regulatory action for the protection of the environment. The foregoing determination is made by the City Council in its independent judgment.

Section 5. Publication. The City Clerk of the City of Half Moon Bay is hereby directed to publish this Ordinance, or the title hereof as a summary, pursuant to Government Code Section 36933, once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Half Moon Bay Review, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Half Moon Bay.

Section 6. Effective date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force on the thirtieth (30th) day from and after its final passage.

INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Half Moon Bay, California, held on the 1st day of February, 2022.

ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Half Moon Bay, California, held on the 15th day of February, 2022, by the following vote:

Ayes, Councilmembers:

Noes, Councilmembers:

Absent, Councilmembers:

Abstain, Councilmembers:

ATTEST:
___________________________ _______________________
Jessica Blair, City Clerk Debbie Ruddock, Mayor
54 Attachment A
Section 1. Findings: The City Council hereby finds the following facts to be true:

A. Scientific evidence has established that natural gas combustion, procurement and transportation produce significant greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to global warming and climate change;
B. On June 18th, 2019, the Half Moon Bay City Council adopted a climate emergency declaration, calling for a mobilization effort to end citywide greenhouse gas emissions as quickly as possible;
C. The City of Half Moon Bay is preparing its Climate Action and Adaptation Plan to, at minimum meet State emissions goals established in SB32 and EO B-55-18; and D. The additions and modifications to the California Building Standards Code listed below are reasonably necessary because of the following local climatic, geologic, and topographical conditions:

1. The City limits of Half Moon Bay includes and borders areas that are considered by the State Fire Hazard Severity zone mapping system to be of High and Very High fire hazard. As such, the City is extremely vulnerable to wildfires. Human activities releasing greenhouse gas into the atmosphere cause increases in worldwide average temperature, drought conditions, vegetative fuel, and length of fire seasons, all of which have the potential to affect Half Moon Bay;

2. Half Moon Bay is within the Coastside Fire Protection District, which is located within a high activity seismic Zone 4. The San Andreas Fault, as well as faults that are not fully charted, are within immediate boundaries of the District. The seismic geological conditions present a very severe potential for multiple fires, major breakage of water mains, major breakage of natural gas mains, multiple electrical power failures, multiple collapsed structures, large number of calls for emergency medical aid, all of which may occursimultaneously during a seismic event;

3. In the event of a natural disaster such as earthquake or fire, the natural gas infrastructure in and around the City of Half Moon Bay presents risks to the life and safety of residents and first responders. Moreover, the electric grid system can be brought back online more swiftly than the natural gas pipeline when the community is recovering from such an event;

4. Half Moon Bay is situated along the Pacific Coastline and the potential impacts of sea level rise are anticipated to increase the City’s exposure to shoreline hazards.

Human activities releasing greenhouse gas into the atmosphere contribute to sea level rise. Rising sea levels are likely to affect the amount of area in the City at risk of coastal flooding, the rate of erosion along the shoreline and bluffs, the area of the City’s tsunami inundation zone, and potential seawater intrusion into riparian systems and groundwater supplies. Loss of shoreline due to rising waters may also 55 threaten the stability of coastal habitats, recreation areas, public access, and infrastructure; and

5. It is reasonably necessary to require buildings to produce renewable, low-carbon electricity and to reduce energy consumption through efficient design in order to reduce the effects of climate change (which have already been experienced locally through sea level rise and wildfires), reduce regional pollution, improve overall safety, and improve resilience to climate change.

Based on the above facts, the City Council finds that Half Moon Bay’s local, geological, topographical, and climatic conditions require amendments to the California Building Standards Code to establish more restrictive conditions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in new buildings, thereby reducing the environmental and health hazards produced by the consumption and transportation of natural gas as summarized in the matrix included hereto in Section 2.

Section 2. Matrix of Justifications.

Matrix of Justifications for Electrification of Buildings (Half Moon Bay Municipal Code Chapter 14.06) Half Moon Bay Municipal Code
Section(s)
Title Justification
(see Section 1)

14.06.030 Requirement for All-Electric Newly Constructed Buildings
1-5

14.06.040 Prohibition on Conversion to Mixed-Fuel Buildings 1-5

14.06.050 Termination of Gas Services 1-5
56 Attachment B
Chapter 14.06 is hereby added to Title 14 of the Half Moon Bay Municipal Code to read as follows:

Chapter 14.06 ELECTRIFICATION OF BUILDINGS
Sections

14.06.010—Title

14.06.020—Definitions

14.06.030—Requirement for All-Electric Newly Constructed Buildings

14.06.040—Prohibition on Conversion to Mixed-Fuel Buildings

14.06.050—Termination of Gas Service

14.06.060—Exceptions

14.06.070—Periodic Review

14.06.080—Violations

14.06.010 Title
This chapter shall be known as “Electrification of Buildings.”

14.06.020 Definitions
A. “Accessory Dwelling Unit” shall have the same meaning as specified in Section 18.02.040 of the Half Moon Bay Municipal Code.

B. “All-Electric Building” or “All-Electric Design” is a building or building design that uses a permanent supply of electricity as the source of energy for all space heating, water heating (including pools and spas), cooking appliances, and clothes drying appliances, and has no Fuel Gas plumbing installed in the building.

C. “All-Electric Conversion” shall mean the conversion of a Mixed-Fuel building to a building that uses a permanent supply of electricity as the source of energy for all space heating, water heating (including pools and spas), decorative uses and lighting, cooking appliances, clothes drying appliances, and in which any previously existing Fuel Gas plumbing connection is capped or decommissioned.

D. “Building” shall have the same meaning as specified in Section 18.02.040 of the Half Moon Bay Municipal Code. Notwithstanding that definition, for purposes of this ordinance, “Building” does not include mobile homes or manufactured homes, pursuant to Health & Safety Code §§ 18015, 18030.5, and 18300(a).
57 E. “Commercial Greenhouse” shall have the same meaning as specified in Section 18.02.040 of the Half Moon Bay Municipal Code.

F. “Dwelling Unit” shall have the same meaning as specified in Section 18.02.040 of the Half Moon Bay Municipal Code.

G. “Electrically Pre-Wire" shall mean to install necessary electrical components to permit future conversion to electric appliances. The required Pre-Wiring measures shall include the following:
a. A dedicated circuit, phased appropriately, for each appliance, with a minimum amperage requirement for a comparable electric appliance (see manufacturer’s recommendations) with an electrical receptacle or junction box that is connected to the electric panel with conductors of adequate capacity, extending to within 3 feet of the appliance and accessible with no obstructions. Appropriately sized conduit may be installed in lieu of conductors;
b. Both end of the conductor or conduit shall be labeled with the words “For Future Electric appliance” and be electrically isolated; c. A circuit breaker shall be installed in the electrical panel for the branch circuit and labeled for each circuit (i.e., “For Future Electric Range”) and;
d. All electrical components, including conductors, receptacles, junction boxes, or blank covers related to this section shall be installed in accordance with the California Electric Code.

H. “Fuel Gas” shall be as defined in the California Plumbing Code Section 208.0 and the California Mechanical Code Section 208.0.

I. “Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit” means a unit as defined in California Government Code Section 65852.22.

J. “Mixed-Fuel Building” means a building that uses Fuel Gas as fuel for space heating or cooling, exterior heating, decorative uses or lighting, water heating (including pools and spas), cooking appliances, clothes drying appliances, or onsite generation of electricity (except where primarily fueled by onsite digestion of organic material).

K. ”Mixed-Use Building” shall have the same meaning as specified for “Mixed Use” in Section

18.02.040 of the Half Moon Bay Municipal Code.

L. “Newly Constructed Building” is a building that has never before been used or occupied for any purpose.
58 M. “Non-Residential Building” shall have the same meaning as specified in the California Energy Code Section 100.1.

N. “Residential Building” means a building in which sleeping accommodation is provided for normal residential purposes and includes one or more family dwellings, including private garages of such buildings. For purposes of this ordinance, “Residential Building” does not include mobile homes or manufactured homes, pursuant to Health & Safety Code §§ 18015, 18030.5, and 18300(a).

14.06.030 Requirement for All-Electric Newly Constructed Buildings Newly Constructed Buildings shall meet the definition of an All-Electric Building and shall be designed using an All-Electric Design.

Exceptions:

1. Development projects for which all building and related permits have been issued and remain valid prior to January 1, 2023. These projects may be constructed as MixedFuel Buildings; however, they must be Electrically Pre-Wired for future electric appliances in any location where a Fuel Gas appliance is installed.

2. New and existing Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units that are attached or wholly within an existing Mixed-Fuel Residential Building may utilize Fuel Gas appliances.

3. This section shall not apply to development projects that have obtained vested rights pursuant to state law prior to the effective date of this Ordinance.

14.06.040 Prohibition on Conversion to Mixed-Fuel Buildings A. Residential Buildings. No existing All-Electric Building may be converted into a Mixed-Fuel Building on or after the effective date of this Chapter.

B. Non-Residential and Mixed-use Buildings. No existing All-Electric Building may be converted into a Mixed-Fuel Building on or after January 1, 2045.

14.06.050 Termination of Gas Service
No later than January 1, 2045, all buildings within Half Moon Bay shall be All-Electric Buildings or All-Electric Conversions and all Fuel Gas plumbing lines shall be capped and/or decommissioned.

14.06.060 Exemptions
A. Commercial Greenhouses shall be exempt from this Chapter until January 1, 2045.

B. Wastewater Treatment Facilities shall be exempt from this Chapter until January 1, 2045. 59 C. Fuel gas generators shall be exempt from the Chapter until January 1, 2045.

D. The requirements of this Chapter shall not apply to the use of portable propane appliances for use outside of the building envelope, such as outdoor cooking and outdoor heating appliances.

14.06.100 Infeasibility Waiver
A. Waiver. If an applicant for a permit for a Newly Constructed Building believes that physical or technical circumstances exist that make it technically or physically infeasible to meet the requirements of this Chapter in part or in whole, the applicant may request an infeasibility waiver as set forth below. Financial considerations alone shall not be a sufficient basis for technical or physical infeasibility. In applying for an exemption, the burden is on the Applicant to show infeasibility.

B. Application Process. An applicant may apply for an infeasibility waiver by submitting a written letter of justification for an infeasibility waiver as early as practicable. Where the project involves issuance of a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) the waiver request shall be filed concurrently and considered concurrently with the CDP. The applicant shall indicate in their letter of justification the maximum threshold of compliance he or she believes is feasible for the project and the circumstances that make it infeasible to fully comply with this Chapter. Circumstances that constitute infeasibility include, but are not limited to the following:

1. There is conflict with another City regulation, such as those requiring historic preservation;

2. There is a lack of commercially available materials, appliances, and/or technologies to comply with the requirements of this Chapter;

3. Applying the requirements of this Chapter would effectuate an unconstitutional interference.

C. Review of Exemption. Where the City Manager or his/her designee determines that it is infeasible for the applicant to fully meet the requirements of this Chapter based on the information provided, the City Manager or his/her designee shall determine the maximum feasible threshold of compliance reasonably achievable for the project and condition the approval accordingly. The decision of the City Manager or his/her designee shall be provided to the applicant in writing. If an exemption is granted but the City Manager or his/her designee determines that the applicant can still achieve a certain threshold of compliance, the applicant shall be required to comply with this Chapter in all other respects and shall be required to achieve, in accordance with this Chapter, the 60 threshold of compliance determined to be achievable by the City Manager or his/her designee.

D. Final Determination. If the City Manager or his/her designee determines that it is reasonably possible for the applicant to fully meet the requirements of this Chapter, the request for an exemption shall be denied and the City Manager or his/her designee shall so notify the applicant in writing.

E. Expiration. The City Manager or his/her designee shall not grant infeasibility waivers on or after January 1, 2045. All Infeasibility Waivers granted previously shall expire on January 1, 2045.

14.06.110 Appeal
A. Any aggrieved Applicant may appeal the determination of the City Manager or his/her designee regarding the granting or denial of an exception or infeasibility waiver pursuant to this Chapter.

B. Any appeal must be filed in writing with the City Clerk not later than fourteen (14) days after the date of the City’s determination. The appeal shall state the alleged error or reason for the appeal.

C. The appeal shall be processed and considered by the City Council in accordance with the provisions of the Half Moon Bay Municipal Code.

14.06.070 Periodic Review
A. The City anticipates that all buildings will be required by the State to be fully electrified over time and thus monitoring and managing implementation of this Chapter is necessary.

B. The City Council shall review the effectiveness of this Chapter in conjunction with the annual review of the City’s adopted Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP).

C. The City Council shall review this Chapter in conjunction with the triannual building code adoption cycle to ensure it is at least as stringent as State Code and to ensure progress under this Chapter is sufficient in conjunction with the City’s Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Goals.

14.06.080 Violations
An owner of a building or property and/or an agent representing the owner subject to this Chapter who fails to comply with any of requirements of this Chapter shall be subject to fines and penalties contained in Title 4 (Code Enforcement) and any other enforcement provisions authorized by the California Building Code or related Codes. 61

BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY

AGENDA REPORT
For meeting of: February 15, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
VIA: Bob Nisbet, City Manager
FROM: Lisa Lopez Rossi, Administrative Services Director TITLE: RESOLUTION APPROVING MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION TO THE AARP NETWORK

OF AGE FRIENDLY STATES AND COMMUNITIES
______________________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a resolution approving the membership application to the AARP Network of Age Friendly States and Communities and authorize the Mayor to sign the accompanying letter.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact with this action.

STRATEGIC ELEMENT:

This action supports the Infrastructure and Environment, and the Healthy Communities and Public Safety elements of the Strategic Plan.

BACKGROUND:

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the number of Americans age 65 or older will grow by almost 50 percent from 2016 to 2030. By 2034, the nation will have more people age 65 or older than under 18. By 2060, nearly 1 in 4 people in the United States will be at least 65 years old. The AARP Network of Age-Friendly States and Communities supports the work of local, regional, and state governments as they prepare for the nation’s changing demographics.

The AARP network was founded in 2012. Its membership consists of towns, cities, counties, states and, so far, one territory that, by joining, have made a commitment to making its communities more livable for people of all ages.

The program’s framework equips local leaders and residents to assess the needs of older adults related to housing, public spaces, transportation, community involvement and more. Once identified, those needs can be incorporated into a clear action plan for achieving solutions. In an age-friendly community, the policies, services, and structures related to the physical and social environment are designed to help seniors "age actively" and be supported as they need more assistance. In other words, the community is set up to help seniors live safely, enjoy good 62

health, stay involved and provide a range of support from various sources, as needed, as they continue to live in their own homes.

Locally, the project was adopted and funded by San Mateo County, led by a core leadership group of local leaders and guided by the Office of Supervisor David Canepa in partnership with the Center for Age-Friendly Excellence (CAFE). CAFE provides technical assistance, consultation, applied research access and community organizing guidance to assist communities to become intentional about the global Age-Friendly initiative and develop plans, infrastructure, and programs to successfully implement age-friendly projects in their community. The following San Mateo County communities have successfully launched agefriendly initiatives: Pacifica, Redwood City, Daly City, Foster City, San Mateo and Colma.

DISCUSSION:

In August 2021, the City of Half Moon Bay, in collaboration with community organizations, community leaders and advocates from throughout the Coastside region and with the assistance of the non-profit Center for Age Friendly Excellence, began their planning for an AgeFriendly Community (AFC) initiative to further increase the livability of their city and surrounding rural region for older adult residents.

They created an AFC Task Force, which consisted of 6 local leaders 60 years of age or older along with 3 members under the age of 60. The task force assessed the unmet needs of their older adult population as they relate to the World Health Organization’s eight domains of livable communities: Transportation, Housing, Social Participation, Respect and Social Inclusion, Civic Participation and Employment, Communication and Information, Community Support and Health Services, and Outdoor Spaces and Buildings.

They did their needs assessment through a series of 17 focus group sessions (with a limit of 10 participants per session) that took place from mid-September to early November 2021 via Zoom, phone or in-person. A total of 89 local residents, ranging in age from 55 to 93, participated in these sessions, with most of them recruited by task force members.

The input from focus group participants touched on all the above AFC domains but the most pressing unmet needs that emerged for many residents age 55 and over included:

1. Communication and information about support services as well as social participation opportunities.

2. Transportation to medical appointments and community events.

3. Access to health care.

4. Affordable Housing.

5. Age Friendly Business/Organization Training and Recognition.

The HMB-Coastside Age-Friendly Community Task Force has determined that these domains will be the first ones they’ll focus on as they develop and implement their inaugural AFC projects. Current members of the HMB-Coastside AFC Task Force will form the basis of a new HMB-Coastside AF Community Coalition and continue meeting on a regular basis, seek 63

community input, recruit volunteers, and enlist community organizations to help them with moving forward with their inaugural projects. A subsequent AFC Action Plan that will be developed and submitted to AARP’s Network of Age Friendly States and Communities within two years of this application for membership to AARP’s AFC Network being approved.

The task force members have selected the following inaugural age friendly projects to further develop and implement:

PROJECT 1: ESTABLISHMENT OF THE HMB-COASTSIDE AGE FRIENDLY COMMUNITY (AFC)

COALITION FOR COORDINATION AND SUPPORT OF THE HMB-COASTSIDE AFC INITIATIVE TO

ENSURE CONTINUED PROGRESS AND SUSTAINABILITY
This Coalition will take the place of the HMB-Coastside Age Friendly Community Task Force and work to ensure the sustainability of this AFC initiative as a grass-roots, broad based community supported effort
PROJECT 2: A PLAN FOR COMMUNICATIONS ABOUT HMB-COASTSIDE EVENTS AND

COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES RELEVANT TO OLDER ADULT RESIDENTS This project intends to increase access by older adults and their family members/friends to information about community events as well as public agencies, non-profits, community groups and faith-based organizations that provide services or organize events of interest to older adult residents as well as other age groups. In addition, it will develop strategies to organize the dissemination of information relevant to older adults in ways that have either not been attempted before or were being utilized prior to the pandemic but can return to the Coastside in a more coordinated and effective way.

PROJECT 3: COASTSIDE HEALTHCARE ACCESS ADVOCACY COMMITTEE The primary focus will be to restart the advocacy for access to health services on the Coastside and maintain that effort long term.

PROJECT 4: AFFORDABLE HOUSING SEARCH AND APPLICATION STRATEGY WORKSHOPS This project will focus on a public education effort that will help to increase awareness of affordable housing resources for those who need it and will empower more people to initiate their own search for affordable housing, with community support as needed.

PROJECT 5: AGE FRIENDLY BUSINESS/COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION TRAINING AND

RECOGNITION
The AFC Coalition will reach out to the local Chamber of Commerce and other interested community volunteers and organizations to join them in the development and implementation of an Age Friendly Business and Organization Recognition Program.

The City of Half Moon Bay and their Coastside organizational and citizen partners believe that the best way to ensure the sustainability of their Age Friendly Community initiative is to be as collaborative as possible. The City of Half Moon Bay, in collaboration with their current community partners, will recruit and bring together an AFC Coalition that represents local 64

organizations, citizen advocates and other stakeholder groups to continue to meet to further develop and implement their inaugural AFC projects as a “community” rather than as a “city”.

While the HMB-Coastside AFC Coalition will not be serving as an official commission of the City of Half Moon Bay, the city will assign a city staff member and a City Council member as coalition members. The AFC Coalition, in collaboration with the City and other stakeholders, will guide the implementation of inaugural projects, develop new AFC projects, and will create the required AFC Action Plan within two years of becoming a member of the AARP Network of AF States and Communities. The AFC Coalition will also be available as a community advisory group for the city and other stakeholders in the community on how to use an age friendly lens on their organization’s activities.

A key strategy of the coalition will be to recruit and select a diverse range of local organizations/residents and community groups to take the lead on specific inaugural/new AFC projects that is based on input from the community as well as on stakeholders’ skills, capacity, interests and organizational mission. The coalition will support these lead organizations/residents/groups who agree to develop and implement a project by providing constructive input, recognition, assistance with identifying funding sources, identifying projects that can be done with very little funding, assistance with grant writing, in-kind support including, but not limited to, meeting space, food, refreshments, copies of printed material, social media outreach and consideration of effective AFC project ideas that have been implemented by other AFC communities that can be replicated on the Coastside.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution

2. Cover Letter
65 Resolution No. C-2022-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY APPROVING THE

APPLICATION TO AARP NETWORK OF AGE-FRIENDLY STATES AND COMMUNITIES WHEREAS, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, the number of Americans age 65 or older will grow by almost 50 percent from 2016 to 2030.; and WHEREAS, the AARP Network of Age-Friendly States and Communities, founded in 2012 supports the work of local, regional, and state governments as they prepare for the nation’s changing demographics; and
WHEREAS, the City of Half Moon Bay, in collaboration with community organizations, community leaders and advocates from throughout the Coastside region and with the assistance of the non-profit Center for Age-Friendly Excellence, created an Age-Friendly Coalition (AFC) Task Force, which consisted of 6 local leaders 60 years of age or older along with 3 members under the age of 60; and
WHEREAS, the AFC Task Force identified inaugural projects that touched on the most pressing unmet needs that emerged for many residents age 55 and over; and WHEREAS, the City understands that our community must become more involved to support existing programs and by exploring new ways to support our neighbors as they grow older;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City of Half Moon Bay hereby:

1. Approves the filing of application to the AARP Age-Friendly Network of States and Communities; and

2. In collaboration with their current community partners, will assist in bringing together an Age-Friendly Coalition that represents local organizations, citizen advocates and other stakeholder groups to continue to meet to further develop and implement inaugural AFC projects.

3. Agrees to comply with all requirements needed to become a member of the AARP Network of Age-Friendly States and Communities.
66 ***************************************************************** I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted on the 15th day of February 2022 by the City Council of Half Moon Bay by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
___________________________ _____________________________ Jessica Blair, City Clerk Debbie Ruddock, Mayor
67 CITY OF HALF MOON BAY
501 Main Street
Half Moon Bay, CA 94019
February 9, 2022
Rafi Nazarians | AARP California
Interim Advocacy Director
200 S. Los Robles Ave., Ste. 400
Pasadena, CA 91101-2422
[email protected]
(626) 585-2638
Dear Mr. Nazarians,
On behalf of the City of Half Moon Bay (HMB), I endorse this membership application to the AARP Network of Age Friendly States and Communities. Half Moon Bay, in partnership with many local organizations and residents who will be joining us as part of the HMB-Coastside Age Friendly Community Coalition, has a strong commitment to enhancing the livability of our area for all our residents, including those who are 60 years of age and older. We believe it is in the best interests of our region that we establish a vibrant, sustainable age friendly community initiative that is supported by a variety of key stakeholders in our community and who will have a key role as co-leaders in helping us achieve this goal.

Located along the scenic San Mateo County coastline of the Pacific Ocean, the City of Half Moon Bay and the surrounding region known locally as “the Coastside” is known for its natural beauty, history, and community spirit. With our over 60 population being our most rapidly growing age demographic, we are committed to Age-Friendly Community goals to ensure that older adults in our community receive respect, dignity, and involvement in all aspects of our Community's future.

The City of Half Moon Bay and our community partners have built local collaborative partnerships within the County of San Mateo by sharing resources and coordinating activities to move the Age-Friendly Initiative forward in this region. In addition to a member of our City Council and a city staff person, the HMB-Coastside Age-Friendly Community Coalition will be comprised of representatives of local organizations and older adults from the community that are committed to:
• Further development and implementation of our inaugural age-friendly projects. • Continuing to seek community input on the needs of older adults. • Establishing a three-year action plan within 2 years of becoming a member of the AARP
Network of AF States and Communities to continue to address identified needs. • Developing tools to measure the progress of our inaugural projects and the action 68 plan.

We look forward to working with our fellow stakeholders, other AFC communities and the AARP Network as we work towards increasing the Age-Friendliness of the Coastside to provide its residents with the tools and resources, they need to remain as independent and vitally involved with their community as possible.

Sincerely,
Debbie Ruddock
Mayor
69

BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY

AGENDA REPORT
For meeting of: February 15, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
VIA: Bob Nisbet, City Manager
FROM: Jessica Blair, Communications Director / City Clerk TITLE: RE-RATIFICATION OF RESOLUTION TO CONTINUE HOLDING PUBLIC MEETINGS REMOTELY (AB 361)
______________________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION:

By motion, in accordance with Assembly Bill 361, re-ratify the findings in Resolution No. 2021- 80 to continue conducting the City’s Council, Commission, and Committee meetings remotely due to health and safety concerns to the public due to COVID-19.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.

STRATEGIC ELEMENT:

This action supports the Inclusive Governance element of the Strategic Plan.

BACKGROUND:

On March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom declared a State of Emergency to make additional resources available, formalize emergency actions already underway across multiple state agencies and departments, and help the state prepare for a broader spread of COVID-19.

Thereafter, on March 17, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution 2020-16 declaring a local emergency due to COVID-19. The same day, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-29- 20, which suspended certain provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act to allow local legislative bodies to conduct meetings telephonically or by other means. Additionally, the State implemented a shelter-in-place order, requiring all non-essential personnel to work from home.

Staff quickly worked to set up remote meetings via Zoom for all City Council and Planning Commission meetings. The Zoom meetings have allowed the Council, Commissions, and Committees to continue to conduct City business from the safety of members’ homes. The City has been utilizing Zoom for the past 18 months to conduct nearly all public meetings. The usage of Zoom for public meetings has allowed the City to ensure the public’s continued access to government meetings while also ensuring the public’s safety. 70

On June 11, 2021, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-08-21, which extended the ability of agencies to hold remote meetings through September 30, 2021, after which agencies anticipated transitioning back to public meetings held in full compliance with the Brown Act. In preparation for the return to in-person meetings, staff has been working on acquiring audio and visual upgrades for City facilities to conduct hybrid meetings. Although hybrid meetings would help to keep the public safe by allowing them to continue accessing the meetings from their own home, Councilmembers, Commissioners, Committee members, and staff would need to meet in person.

Since the Governor issued Executive Order N-08-21, the Delta variant has emerged, causing a spike in cases throughout the state. As a result, the San Mateo County Health Department issued a Health Order requiring masks indoors in public places, regardless of vaccination status, starting August 3, 2021.

On September 16, 2021, Governor Newson signed Assembly Bill 361 (AB 361), which allows cities to continue to meet remotely during proclaimed states of emergency under modified Brown Act requirements that are similar but not identical to the rules and procedures established by the previous Executive Orders.

AB 361 authorizes local agencies to use teleconferencing without complying with the teleconferencing requirements imposed by the Ralph M. Brown Act during a declared state of emergency, when state or local health officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing during the proclaimed state of emergency, or when there is an imminent risk to the health or safety of attendees.

On October 5, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-80 under the requirements of AB 361 to continue conducting meetings remotely. AB 361 requires the City Council to make the findings every 30 days, necessitating the need for this item.

On December 15, 2021, a statewide mask mandate went into effect due to a rise in cases across the state.

On January 10, 2022, in response to the surge of COVID-19 cases, Omicron variant, City Hall closed to the public moving services to remote services.

DISCUSSION:

AB 361 will allow local legislative bodies to continue to meet remotely after the September 30, 2021 expiration of the Governor’s executive orders. A local agency will be allowed to continue to meet remotely when:
• The local agency holds a meeting during a declared state of emergency • State or local health officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing
71

• Legislative bodies declare the need to meet remotely due to present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees
The City meets the requirements to continue holding meetings remotely to ensure the health and safety of the public due to the following:
• The City is still under a local state of emergency
• County health orders require that all individuals in public spaces maintain social distancing and wear masks
• The City can’t maintain social distancing requirements for the public, staff, Councilmembers, Commissioners, and Committee Members in their meeting spaces The City cannot ensure social distancing requirements are met inside City facilities where the City Council, Planning Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, Redistricting Advisory Committee, Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, and Main Street Bridge Advisory Committee meet.

Councilmembers, Commissioners, Committee Members, and staff sit well within six feet of each other. Moreover, the County’s indoor mask order is still in effect, making it difficult to hear what Councilmembers, Commissioners, Committee Members, staff, and public speakers are saying. Furthermore, while speaking through masks may be understandable in person, picking up speech on microphones for those attending remotely and those watching any livestreams would be difficult.

Per AB 361, the City Council would need to declare every 30 days that the City’s legislative bodies must continue to meet remotely to ensure the health and safety of the public. Staff recommends that the City Council declare these findings are true so these bodies can continue to meet remotely. Staff will return with this resolution for re-ratification at the Council’s 1st Tuesday meeting each month, at which time the Council can reassess as various health orders and COVID-19 parameters change.
72

BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY

AGENDA REPORT
For meeting of: February 15, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
VIA: Bob Nisbet, City Manager
FROM: Jessica Blair, Communications Director / City Clerk TITLE: RECEIPT OF LEGISLATIVE POSITION LETTERS
______________________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file support letter sent for Senate Bill 45.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.

STRATEGIC ELEMENT:

This action supports the Inclusive Governance element of the Strategic Plan.

DISCUSSION:

Annually, the City adopts a Legislative Platform to allow staff to send position letters regarding various bills / issues of interest to the City. The 2021 Legislative Platform was adopted by the City Council on April 6, 2021. The platform provides staff direction and allows the City, on the Council’s behalf, to respond in support of or opposition to bills and other legislative and administrative actions. The City Council has delegated its authority to the Mayor and / or City Manager to sign position letters consistent with the legislative platform. Townsend Public Affairs monitors legislation for the City and communicates frequently with staff on bills.

Occasionally, the League of California Cities will send action alerts for bills affecting municipalities. Staff reviews those alerts as well and will take action on any that align with the City’s Legislative Platform.

In the spirit of transparency, when position letters are sent by the City, staff will include them in a City Council agenda packet for viewing by the Council and the community.

ATTACHMENTS:

SB 45 Support Letter
73 City of Half Moon Bay City Hall
501 Main St.

Half Moon Bay, CA 94019
February 10, 2022
The Honorable Anthony Portantino
California State Senate
10th and O Offices, Suite 7630
Sacramento, CA 95814
Re: Senate Bill 45 (Portantino) Short-lived climate pollutants: Organic waste reduction goals: Local jurisdiction assistance
Letter of Support from the City of Half Moon Bay
Dear Senator Portantino:

On behalf of the City of Half Moon Bay, I write to express my strong support for your SB 45, which would provide assistance to local jurisdictions for organic waste diversion programs.

As you know, local jurisdictions have struggled to comply with the timelines for the implementation of SB 1383 regulations. While we appreciate the efforts that the Legislature made last year to address penalties, we are working hard to meet the State’s organic waste climate goals but cannot do that without assistance from the state and/or delayed implementation.

We are already pursuing both local and countywide solutions to meet the SB 1383 mandates.

Locally, we have already updated our Municipal Code to align with SB 1383 and are in the process of modifying our Sustainable Purchasing and Practices Policy and template construction contracts.

Regionally, we have executed an MOU with the County of San Mateo Office of Sustainability to implement and enforce the edible food recovery requirements and will be participating in a countywide compost broker program and compost quality education campaign. Even with all these efforts, there are many requirements in SB 1383 that we have not been able to start implementing yet.

SB 45 would be a welcome and necessary help to local governments of all sizes, and for that reason, I strongly support this bill.

Sincerely,
Debbie Ruddock
Mayor of Half Moon Bay
CC: Senator Josh Becker
Assemblymember Marc Berman
DocuSign Envelope ID: 6373E85B-5F0B-4803-A969-7CFF6E3416FC 74

BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY

AGENDA REPORT
For meeting of: February 15, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
VIA: Bob Nisbet, City Manager
FROM: Jessica Blair, Communications Director / City Clerk TITLE: REDISTRICTING PROCESS / TIMELINE
____________________________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file report on process and timeline for the 2021-2022 Redistricting Process and direct staff as appropriate.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this report.

STRATEGIC ELEMENT:

This action supports the Inclusive Governance element of the Strategic Plan.

BACKGROUND:

The City Council transitioned to district elections in 2018, following a threat of litigation claiming the City’s at-large election system was in violation of the California Voting Rights Act.

Once a City has transitioned to district elections, state law requires the City Council to examine and, if necessary, adjust the City Council district boundaries every 10 years following the Federal Census to ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act. Adoption of the new map must occur sometime between August 1, 2021 and April 17, 2022.

On February 1, 2022, staff was directed to prepare a report summarizing the timeline and process used during the Redistricting process.

DISCUSSION:

Redistricting Advisory Committee
Senate Bill 1018, effective January 1, 2019, provided additional methods for adjusting boundaries, including the creation of an advisory committee.
75

At its April 6, 2021 meeting, the City Council directed staff to initiate recruitment and creation of a Redistricting Advisory Committee (RAC). Additionally, the Council asked staff to conduct public outreach regarding what district model the public preferred – a four district model with an elected mayor, or a five-district model with an annual rotating mayor. Further, if an elected mayor was preferred, would a two-year term or a four-year term be a better fit for this community.

On May 4, 2021, the City Council adopted a resolution forming the seven-member RAC and setting its bylaws. The Council added additional requirements that each committee member file a Statement of Economic Interests, Form 700, and not apply for Planning Commission or City Council seats for four years. The charge of the Committee was to ultimately present two maps to the City Council for review – one with four districts and an elected mayor, and one with five districts which would provide for an annual rotating mayor.

On June 15, 2021, following an extensive recruitment process, the City Council appointed seven members to RAC - Michael Settles, Claudia Marshall, Marin Holt, Paul Gater, Steve Maller, Phil Marshall, and Hal Bogner. On July 15, 2021, the first RAC meeting was held.

During each of the two mapping meetings, the RAC discussed draft maps prepared by NDC that were informed by public and committee testimony, draft maps submitted by community members, 2020 U.S. Census data, and RAC feedback.

All RAC meetings and workshops offered Spanish translation. Recordings of all RAC meetings and community workshops are available on the City’s website and meeting agendas and presentations are available on the City’s redistricting webpage.

With extensive training on redistricting laws, final map criteria, communities of interest, and community engagement strategies, RAC and City staff hosted a series of virtual community meetings and workshops and two pre-map public hearings between July 15, 2021 and September 2, 2021. At each workshop, staff from the City’s contracted demographer, National Demographics Corporation (NDC), presented an overview of redistricting requirements, and demonstrated how to use mapping tools. Community members were invited to join numerous workshops and encouraged to respond to the City’s survey on communities of interest and district model and to provide testimony to inform the RAC about unique community characteristics and needs.

Community members were also encouraged to submit draft maps using paper map kits and the DistrictR online mapping tool, and later, Dave’s online mapping tool. In total, 35 maps were reviewed and details for each are viewable on the City’s redistricting webpage. All community-submitted maps were reviewed by the RAC.

Following the community workshop series, the RAC held two map drawing public hearing meetings on November 8, 2021 and December 16, 2021.

At its November 8, 2021 meeting, it was determined that each map submitted by the public was not population balanced. This was due to the DistrictR mapping tool using population estimates and not 76

having been updated to reflect final Census numbers. The RAC opted to re-open the public map submittal period and to use a separate mapping tool, Dave’s Redistricting App. City staff conducted another robust public outreach campaign and a new set of maps was submitted and reviewed by RAC at its next meeting.

At its December 16, 2021 meeting, the Committee voted to recommend four focus maps for City Council consideration, details of which are discussed later in this report with the understanding that Council would provide direction to the Committee, they would meet again and narrow the maps from four to two.

City Council
At its January 19, 2022 meeting, the City Council conducted a public hearing to review draft maps and the recommendations of the Redistricting Advisory Committee. Following the public hearing, the Council voted 3-2 to direct staff to return with an ordinance adopting Map 504c – one of the five district maps.

On February 1, 2022, the Council directed staff, by way of a future item requested by Mayor Ruddock, seconded by Vice Mayor Penrose, to prepare an item that discussed the process and timeline used during the process.

On February 15, 2022, the City Council received both this item as well as a staff report for the first reading and introduction of an ordinance adopting Map 504c and setting the necessary election sequencing.

Timeline Adjustments
When the City Council appointed members to the Redistricting Advisory Committee on June 15, 2021, a tentative meeting schedule was included (Attachment 1). There was an in-person public open house scheduled for a Saturday on January 22, 2022. Due to the surge of COVID cases as a result of the Omicron variant, this meeting was canceled. The original purpose of the January 27, 2022 meeting was for the Committee to discuss Council input, narrow to two maps, and discuss their final report to the Council. Given the Council’s vote to approve Map 504c on January 19, 2022, the RAC used this meeting to receive additional public input, discuss the district sequencing consequences of “voter deferment” and voter acceleration,” and discuss their final report to the Council – ultimately appointing a subcommittee of Chair Holt, Vice Chair Gater, and Committee Member P. Marshall to prepare the final report. There was also an additional City Council meeting built into the schedule to allow the Council an opportunity to hold an additional public hearing if necessary.

Community Engagement / Public Outreach
Following the creation of the RAC, City staff has conducted a robust public outreach campaign to reach as many residents as possible to ensure they were aware of the process and how to be involved.

Graphics were created with information about the process, with a tagline of “Think Inside the Lines.” 77

Utilizing the City’s traditional communication channels, a number of informative articles, meeting announcements, survey promotion, and direct email and phone outreach to key community partners was conducted. Additionally, staff City staff and members of RAC tabled at many events and location including the Library, the Farmers Market, Make it Main Street, church services, ALAS events and services, and other venues. RAC members also utilized their own personal channels to reach out to their own networks about the process. Paper kits were also available at all events and at City Hall and the library which included an information sheet, a copy of the City’s survey, and a paper map.

Materials and key messages continue to be shared with an extensive list of community partners who have been instrumental in ensuring members of their own networks are kept apprised of ongoing redistricting efforts and the various ways in which they can participate. Community members have several options for receiving updates about redistricting directly from the City, including signing up to receive information through the City’s weekly eNewsletter and following the City’s social media accounts.

The City’s redistricting webpage is a repository for all items related to this redistricting initiative. The website contains background information on the redistricting process, an overview of the RAC and its members, and links to all relevant documents and draft maps, as well as video recordings of all meetings and tutorials on how to use the mapping software. Also available is an interactive map tool that allows users to view various maps and boundaries including current City Council district lines as they consider their feedback on the redistricting process. The webpage will remain active for 10 years following the completion of the redistricting process, as required by law.

Materials are available electronically and in print, and in accordance with state requirements all are available in English and Spanish.

The final map must be adopted by the City Council and all associated administrative work must be completed by City staff no later than April 17, 2022.

ATTACHMENT:

Schedule as presented to the City Council on June 15, 2021 78 REDISTRICTING ADVISORY COMMITTEE CALENDAR
*All meetings held on Thursday evenings unless noted
JULY 15 (RAC) – INTRODUCTION (BROWN ACT, PRA, OVERVIEW OF TRANSITION TO DISTRICTS,

REDISTRICTING BASICS)
AUGUST 12 (RAC) – PUBLIC / COMMITTEE WORKSHOP ON MAPPING, LEGISLATION, ETC.

AUGUST 19 (RAC) – PUBLIC / COMMITTEE WORKSHOP ON DISTRICT MODEL / ELECTION SEQUENCING AUGUST 26 (RAC) – PUBLIC HEARING #1
SEPTEMBER 2 (RAC) – PUBLIC HEARING #2
AUGUST 16 – CENSUS DATA RELEASED (LEGACY FORMAT)
LATE SEPTEMBER – CALIFORNIA PRISONER-ADJUSTED DATA AVAILABLE LATE OCTOBER – END OF MANDATED THREE-WEEK WAITING PERIOD TO RELEASE MAPS NOVEMBER 8 (MONDAY) (RAC) – FIRST DRAFTS OF COMMITTEE MAPS, SELECT 3-5 FOCUS MAPS DECEMBER 16 (RAC) – SELECT 2-3 FOCUS MAPS
JANUARY 19 (WEDNESDAY) (COUNCIL) – PUBLIC HEARING #3, REVIEW FOCUS MAPS, PROVIDE

REVISIONS, IF ANY
JANUARY 22 (SATURDAY) (RAC) – PUBLIC INPUT ON FOCUS MAPS JANUARY 27 (RAC) – PUBLIC INPUT ON FOCUS MAPS
FEBRUARY 15 (CITY COUNCIL) – PUBLIC HEARING #4, FINAL MAP SELECTION & ELECTION SEQUENCING MARCH 15 (CITY COUNCIL) – CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE ADOPTING DISTRICT MAP & ELECTION SEQUENCING (ADOPTION BY RESOLUTION IF SB 594 IS ENACTED).

APRIL 17 – DEADLINE FOR COUNCIL ADOPTION OF MAP (APRIL 5 CITY COUNCIL MEETING) MAY 12 – COMMITTEE CLOSING CELEBRATION
79

BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY

AGENDA REPORT
For meeting of: February 15, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
VIA: Bob Nisbet, City Manager
FROM: Jessica Blair, Communications Director / City Clerk TITLE: INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 1.24 WITH

RESPECT TO ELECTING MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, REDRAWING BOUNDARIES, AND SEQUENCING OF ELECTIONS WITHIN THE DISTRICTS (8:15 PM) ____________________________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION:

Conduct a public hearing and introduce on first reading, an ordinance amending Chapter 1.24 of the Half Moon Bay Municipal Code with respect to electing members of the City Council, redrawing boundaries, and sequencing of elections within the districts.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The City Council approved an agreement with National Demographics Corporation on January 19, 2021 for demographer services for this process at a cost of roughly $45,000. Additional costs have been incurred for necessary public outreach and were incorporated into the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 budget.

STRATEGIC ELEMENT:

This action supports the Inclusive Governance element of the Strategic Plan.

BACKGROUND:

The City Council transitioned to district elections in 2018, following a threat of litigation claiming the City’s at-large election system was in violation of the California Voting Rights Act.

Once a City has transitioned to district elections, state law requires the City Council to examine and, if necessary, adjust the City Council district boundaries every 10 years following the Federal Census to ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act. Adoption of the new map must occur sometime between August 1, 2021 and April 17, 2022.

At its April 6, 2021 meeting, the City Council opted to appoint a Redistricting Advisory Committee to conduct much of the public input and map drawing process, members of which were appointed on June 15, 2021.
80

For a full summary of the timeline of the Redistricting Advisory Committee’s meetings, as well as the community outreach and survey on this process conducted by the City, please see the January 19, 2022 staff report. Additionally, a separate item regarding process and timeline is included as part of this agenda packet.

DISCUSSION:

At its January 19, 2022 meeting, the City Council conducted its first map drawing public hearing to review draft maps and the recommendations of the Redistricting Advisory Committee. Following the public hearing, the Council voted 3-2 to direct staff to return with an ordinance adopting Map 504c,.

MAP ANALYSIS
As included in the January 19, 2022 staff report, the Redistricting Advisory Committee recommended four focus maps for the Council’s review - Map 504c, Map 503b, Map 402, and Map 403b. Additionally, the final report from the Committee, as submitted by a subcommittee appointed at its January 27, 2022 meeting (Chair Holt, Vice Chair Gater, and Committee Member P. Marshall), is included as Attachment 4 to this report.

As mentioned previously, the City Council held its first map drawing public hearing, the third public hearing of the required four, at its January 19, 2022 meeting. Following the public hearing, the City Council voted 3-2 to direct staff to return with an ordinance adopting Map 504c. The four focus maps and the City’s current district boundaries from the 2018 transition, are included as Attachment 2.

Additional public correspondence received on the focus map and process since the last Council meeting are included as Attachment 5.

Election Sequencing
As part of map selection, election sequencing must be determined. Election sequencing is determining which districts are up for election in which order, beginning with the next regular election. There are criteria included in the FAIR MAPS Act; for example, the redrawing of district lines may not change the term of an already elected councilmember.

Given that Districts 2 and 3, with the boundaries adopted in 2018 as part of the transition to district elections, voted in November 2020, those two districts must wait to elect again until 2024. The three remaining districts will elect representatives in November 2022.

November 2022 Election – Districts 1, 4, and 5 will elect a representative to a four-year term.

November 2024 Election – Districts 2 and 3 will elect a representative to a four-year term.

This sequencing will repeat until such time the City is required to redraw its district boundaries, which is expected following the 2030 U.S. Census.
81

Voter Deferrals / Acceleration
With map drawing and election sequencing, a natural byproduct of that process is that some voters will move districts from those they were in previously. This will cause those voters to either have their votes deferred (skip an election) or accelerated (vote in back-to-back elections). Consideration of this effect is not one of the four map-drawing criteria outlined in the FAIR MAPS Act and is therefore looked at during election sequencing.

For City Council Focus Map 504c, 993 voters (1,351 population) will be deferred to the November 2024 election, and 2,334 residents (population) will be accelerated to November 2022.

Maps depicting the deferrals and accelerations for the other three maps included in the RAC’s recommendation are included as Attachment 3 to this report.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Several questions have been raised in the community following the January 19, 2022 City Council meeting regarding proper procedures and redistricting criteria under voting rights laws, including the Fair And Inclusive Redistricting for Municipalities And Political Subdivisions (FAIR MAPS) Act (AB 849, Government Code section 21500 et seq.). Specifically, questions regarding:
• Redistricting criteria, including “communities of interest” • Definitions of “gerrymandering” and “disenfranchisement” • Definitions of voter deferral and voter acceleration
In 2019, the California Legislature passed the FAIR MAPS Act to improve redistricting criteria, transparency, and public engagement. According to the Senate Committee Report on Elections and Constitutional Amendments, “AB 849 demonstrates our State’s commitment that representative and inclusive democracy matters at all levels of government, including city and county. These reforms will result in a redistricting process that is fairer to California’s diverse communities, more transparent, better organized, and more consistently-applied across city and county governments.” The Act standardized redistricting procedures and requirements for cities and counties, including imposing significant new public hearing, outreach, notice, and transparency requirements. Specifically, cities are required to hold at least four hearings, including at least one hearing or workshop on a weekend or after 6 p.m. on a weekday. (Gov. Code 21607.1). All public hearings for this process have been held after 6 p.m. on a weekday.

FAIR MAPS Act Criteria – (Including Communities of Interest) Regarding substantive criteria, the FAIR MAPS Act established ranked criteria for adopting new city council district boundaries. These criteria are as follows:
82

(a) Following each decennial federal census, and using that census as a basis, the council shall, by ordinance or resolution, adopt boundaries for any or all of the council districts of the city so that the council districts shall be substantially equal in population as required by the United States Constitution.
(1) Population equality shall be based on the total population of residents of the city as determined by that census.
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), an incarcerated person as that term is used in Section 21003, shall not be counted as part of a city’s population, except for an incarcerated person whose last known place of residence may be assigned to a census block in the city, if information about the last known place of residence for incarcerated persons is included in the computerized database for redistricting that is developed in accordance with subdivision (b) of Section 8253 of the Government Code, and that database is made publicly available.
(b) The council shall adopt council district boundaries that comply with the United States Constitution, the California Constitution, and the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 (52 U.S.C. Sec. 10301 et seq.).
(c) The council shall adopt district boundaries using the following criteria as set forth in the following order of priority:
(1) To the extent practicable, council districts shall be geographically contiguous. Areas that meet only at the points of adjoining corners are not contiguous. Areas that are separated by water and not connected by a bridge, tunnel, or regular ferry service are not contiguous.
(2) To the extent practicable, the geographic integrity of any local neighborhood or local community of interest shall be respected in a manner that minimizes its division. A “community of interest” is a population that shares common social or economic interests that should be included within a single district for purposes of its effective and fair representation. Communities of interest do not include relationships with political parties, incumbents, or political candidates. (3) Council district boundaries should be easily identifiable and understandable by residents. To the extent practicable, council districts shall be bounded by natural and artificial barriers, by streets, or by the boundaries of the city. (4) To the extent practicable, and where it does not conflict with the preceding criteria in this subdivision, council districts shall be drawn to encourage geographical compactness in a manner that nearby areas of population are not bypassed in favor of more distant populations.
(d) The council shall not adopt council district boundaries for the purpose of favoring or discriminating against a political party.
(Elections Code § 21601 [emphasis added to call out the definition of “community of interest”]).

The California Constitution defines community of interest:

As community of interest is a contiguous population which shares common social and economic interests that should be included within a single district for purposes of its 83

effective and fair representation. Examples of such shared interests are those common to an urban area, a rural area, an industrial area, or an agricultural area, and those common to areas in which the people share similar living standards, use the same transportation facilities, have similar work opportunities, or have access to the same media of communication relevant to the election process. Communities of interest shall not include relationships with political parties, incumbents, or political candidates.

Cal. Const. article XXI, section 2.

These shared interests can be in “immigration, language, culture, and persistent socioeconomic disparities,” among others. (Luna v. County of Kern (E.D. Cal. 2018) 291 F.Supp.3d 1088, 1110). “Parties can even be adverse for some purposes and share a community of legal interest for other purposes.” (DC Comics v. Pacific Pictures Corp. (C.D. Cal. 2012) 2012 WL 12878651, *2).

Race alone cannot be the predominant factor in districting without subjecting the plan to strict scrutiny. (Miller v. Johnson (1995) 515 U.S. 900, 902 [115 S.Ct. 2475, 2481, 132 L.Ed.2d 762]). The community must share more than race but “some common thread of relevant interests,” as within social, political, and economic contexts. (Id. at 920).

Gerrymandering and Disenfranchisement
The FAIR MAPS Act does not expressly refer to “gerrymandering” but effectively prohibits it with respect to political parties. Gov. Code § 21601(d) (“The council shall not adopt council district boundaries for the purpose of favoring or discriminating against a political party.”) While not defined under the Act, “gerrymandering” refers to the act of manipulating the redistricting process to achieve political gain, at the expense of other groups or individuals. (Santa Clara County Redistricting Manual (2021) at p. 11; see also 2020 California Citizens Redistricting Commission [“Gerrymandering generally refers to the drawing of district lines by who will benefit from the way the districts are drawn.”]) The process was named after Governor Elbridge Gerry, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, produced a map for state senate districts in Massachusetts that would reward his political allies. This map was parodied in a political cartoon as looking like a salamander, thus the “Gerry-mander.”
In a letter including in the Senate Committee Report on Elections and Constitutional Amendments, California Common Cause stated its support for the FAIR MAPS Act in part because it would prevent gerrymandering:

When it comes to state legislative and Congressional redistricting, California is a national model. The state Citizens Redistricting Commission – with its transparent process, commitment to genuine public engagement, and application of fair and clear criteria – has been praised by reformers and academics alike for keeping communities intact and eliminating partisan bias in redistricting.
84

However, in strong contrast, when it comes to local redistricting, there are only minimal transparency and public outreach requirements and no mandatory criteria other than equal population. As a result, many communities never engage with, or feel excluded from, the local redistricting process. The weakness of our local redistricting laws also enables racially-discriminatory, partisan, and pro-incumbent gerrymandering to persist at the local level in California.
“Disenfranchisement” is typically defined as the deprivation of a franchise, of a legal right, or of some privilege or immunity especially the right to vote (Merriam-Webster). In the context of redistricting, concerns regarding “disenfranchisement” are generally considered in the context of voter deferrals.

Voter Accelerations and Deferrals
The Santa Clara County Redistricting Manual (2021)1 defines voter accelerations and deferrals as follows:

Accelerations – In an election area where there are four-year terms and elections every two years, a redistricting will result in a situation where a voter just recently elected a representative, then a redistricting happens, their district changes, and they get to again elect a representative just two years later. Technically, in this situation, they have two representatives – the one they elected before the redistricting, and the one they just voted for. Their opportunity to vote has been accelerated by two years.

Deferrals – In an election area where there are four-year terms, and elections every two years, a redistricting will result in a situation where a voter is set to elect a representative in the coming election, then a redistricting happens and their district changes to one that is not up for two more years. When their incumbent representative retires, they don’t have the opportunity to vote on a new representative. Technically, in this situation, they have no representative – their old representative moved to a different area and they have not yet had a chance to elect a new representative under the redistricted system. Their right to representation has been deferred for two years.

As discussed above, the FAIR MAPS Act does not use accelerations or deferrals as a criteria for map selection. In fact, it is inevitable that some voters will be deferred and others will be accelerated. The California Supreme Court has suggested that an excessive number of deferred/accelerated voters could indicate an improper purpose (such as racial gerrymandering). See Vandermost v. Bowen (2012) 53 Cal.4th 421, 482 (“The Commission concludes that as a result, under petitioner's nesting proposal, “the brunt of double-deferral will fall on voters of color who would be unable to vote for their senators of choice in 2012 elections and could be further deferred under an as-yet determined set of maps.”).

However, staff is not aware of any guidance regarding the percentage of deferred voters that would give rise to an inference of pretextual motive.
1 Available at: https://countyexec.sccgov.org/sites/g/files/exjcpb621/files/2021- 08/County%20of%20Santa%20Clara%20Redistricting%20Manual%202021.pdf. Staff is not aware of a similar manual for San Mateo County.
85

CONCLUSION AND NEXT STEPS
The final map must be adopted by the City Council and all associated administrative work must be completed by City staff no later than April 17, 2022. Second reading and adoption of the ordinance, if adopted tonight, would be scheduled for the March 1, 2022 City Council meeting.

If the City Council did not move forward with adoption of this ordinance, staff would return with the focus maps as directed by the City Council for an additional public hearing and map selection.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Ordinance Amending Chapter 1.24

2. Focus Maps (504c, 503b, 402, 403b) and Current District Map (2018)

3. Voter Deferral / Acceleration Maps (504c, 503b, 402, 403b)

4. Redistricting Advisory Committee Final Report

5. Correspondence Received
86 ORDINANCE NO. C-2022-____

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY AMENDING CHAPTER

1.24 OF THE HALF MOON BAY MUNICIPAL CODE TO WITH RESPECT TO ELECTING MEMBERS

OF THE CITY COUNCIL, REDRAWING BOUNDARIES, AND SEQUENCING OF ELECTIONS WITHIN

DISTRICTS
Section 1. Findings: The City Council finds and declares as follows.

WHEREAS, in September 2018, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2018-03, establishing the election of councilmembers by district; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 2018-03 added section 1.24.090 of the Half Moon Bay Municipal Code establishing the boundaries of four districts and an at-large elected mayor; and WHEREAS, Elections Code section 21620 et seq. requires the City Council to adjust the boundaries of each City Council district following each decennial federal census; and WHEREAS, the decennial federal census was completed in 2020; and WHEREAS, on April 6, 2021, the City Council directed staff to move forward with the creation of a Redistricting Advisory Committee. The 7-member committee was appointed on June 15, 2021 and met from July 2021-January 2022.

WHEREAS, in compliance with Elections Code 21627.1, the City has held four public hearings and received public input concerning the adjustment of City Council district boundaries. Said hearings were held on November 8, 2021 (Redistricting Advisory Committee), December 16, 2021 (Redistricting Advisory Committee), January 19, 2022, and February 15, 2022.

WHEREAS, in compliance with Elections Code section 21628, the City provided language translations services at each of the public hearings as well as interpretation of qualifying materials in English and Spanish.

WHEREAS, in compliance with Elections Code section 21628(d)(1), the City has published the draftmaps atleastseven days before the hearingsheld before theCity Council on January 19, 2022, and February 15, 2022.
87 NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 2. Section 1.24.090 of the Half Moon Bay Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows:
a. Beginning with the municipal election in 2022, members of the City Council shall be elected in the electoral districts established in Section 1.24.090(c) and subsequently reapportioned as provided by state law. Elections shall take place by-district as that term is defined in California Government Code Section 34871, meaning one member of the City Council shall be elected from each district, by the voters of the district alone.

Each member of the City Council shall serve a four-year term. b. Members of the City Council shall be elected on a by-district basis from the five City Council districts hereby established. The boundaries and identifying number of each district shall be as described on the City Council District Map attached hereto as “Exhibit A” and incorporated by reference.
c. Commencing with the general municipal election in November 2022 and thereafter, the voters in districts 1, 3, and 5 shall elect members of the City Council by-district for full four (4) year terms. At the general municipal election in November 2024, and thereafter, the voters in districts 2 and 3 shall elect members of the City Council by-district for full four (4) year terms.
d. Registered voters signing nomination papers or voting for a member of the City Council shall be residents of the geographical area making up the district from which the candidate is to be elected.
e. A candidate for City Council must live in, and be a registered voter in, the district in which he or she seeks election at the time nomination papers are issued, pursuant to Elections Code Section 10227. Termination of residency in a district by a councilmember shall create an immediate vacancy for that district unless the councilmember immediately declares and establishes another residence within the district within 30 days.

Section 3. Constitutionality and Severability
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision or decisions shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.

Section 4. Publication. The City Clerk of the City of Half Moon Bay is hereby directed to publish this Ordinance, or the title hereof as a summary, pursuant to Government Code Section 36933, once within fifteen (15) days after its passage in the Half Moon Bay Review, a newspaper of general circulation published in the city of Half Moon Bay. 88 Section 5. Effective date.

This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force on the thirtieth (30th) day from and after its final passage.

INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Half Moon Bay, California, held on the 15th day of February 2022.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Half Moon Bay, California, held on the ___ day of ___________ 2022, by the following vote:

Ayes, Councilmembers:

Noes, Councilmembers:

Absent, Councilmembers:

Abstain, Councilmembers:

ATTEST:
___________________________ _______________________
Jessica Blair, City Clerk Debbie Ruddock, Mayor
89 Half Moon Bay Golf Links
92 1
1 Half Moon Bay
2021 Redistricting
Map 504c
National Demographics Corporation
December 17, 2021
Map layers
504c
Landmark Point
Landmark Area
Water Area
River
Streets
©2021 CALIPER
90 504c
District 1
Total Pop 2,298
Deviation from ideal -65
% Deviation -2.75%
% Hisp 28.6%
% NH White 60%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian-American 8%
Total 1,924
% Hisp 20%
% NH White 71%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 9%
Total 1,612
% Latino est. 21%
% Spanish-Surnamed 19%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 1%
Total 1,408
% Latino est. 20%
% Spanish-Surnamed 18%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 1%
Total 1,202
% Latino est. 14%
% Spanish-Surnamed 13%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 83%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,636
age0-19 21%
age20-60 48%
age60plus 31%
immigrants 28%
naturalized 54%
english 71%
spanish 21%
asian-lang 4%
other lang 4%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 11%
hs-grad 26%
bachelor 33%
graduatedegree 25%
Child in Household child-under18 24%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 62%
income 0-25k 12%
income 25-50k 5%
income 50-75k 12%
income 75-200k 29%
income 200k-plus 41%
single family 96%
multi-family 4%
rented 16%
owned 84%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 2,398
35 1.48%
41%
49%
1%
6%
2,001
27%
65%
1%
7%
1,413
23%
21%
4%
3%
71%
1%
1,214
20%
19%
4%
2%
73%
1%
959
16%
14%
4%
2%
78%
1%
3,323
27%
56%
17%
24%
54%
48%
40%
3%
9%
22%
33%
21%
21%
40%
74%
2%
11%
9%
52%
26%
75%
25%
37%
63%
3 2,281
-82
-3.47%
39%
52%
1%
6%
1,408
14%
76%
2%
7%
1,523
24%
22%
3%
2%
71%
2%
1,320
21%
20%
3%
2%
73%
2%
977
17%
16%
2%
2%
78%
2%
2,017
20%
46%
34%
26%
44%
56%
33%
6%
5%
22%
28%
29%
18%
23%
62%
17%
16%
8%
34%
25%
70%
30%
42%
58%
4 2,454
91 3.85%
17%
69%
1%
10%
2,222
9%
78%
0%
10%
1,863
9%
9%
5%
1%
85%
0%
1,676
8%
7%
5%
1%
86%
0%
1,432
7%
7%
4%
1%
88%
0%
2,764
17%
46%
37%
21%
44%
83%
16%
1%
0%
4%
30%
27%
32%
20%
65%
4%
12%
6%
44%
35%
95%
5%
8%
92%
5 2,383
20 0.85%
24%
63%
1%
8%
1,633
12%
79%
1%
9%
1,672
11%
11%
3%
2%
83%
1%
1,495
10%
10%
3%
2%
84%
1%
1,119
7%
7%
3%
2%
86%
1%
2,187
18%
51%
31%
25%
44%
65%
25%
5%
5%
16%
30%
31%
19%
23%
67%
17%
10%
8%
34%
32%
77%
23%
33%
67%
Total
11,814
173

7.32%
30%
59%
1%
8%
9,189
16%
73%
1%
8%
8,083
17%
16%
4%
2%
77%
1%
7,113
15%
14%
4%
2%
79%
1%
5,689
12%
11%
3%
1%
83%
1%
12,927
21%
50%
29%
25%
49%
65%
27%
4%
5%
15%
29%
28%
23%
26%
66%
10%
11%
9%
39%
32%
83%
17%
27%
73%
12/18/2021 13:23 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
91 92
1 1
Half Moon Bay
2021 Redistricting
Map 503b
National Demographics Corporation
December 16, 2021
Map layers
503b
Water Area
River
Streets
©2021 CALIPER
92 503b
District 1
Total Pop 2,298
Deviation from ideal -65
% Deviation -2.75%
% Hisp 28.6%
% NH White 60%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian-American 8%
Total 1,924
% Hisp 20%
% NH White 71%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 9%
Total 1,612
% Latino est. 21%
% Spanish-Surnamed 19%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 1%
Total 1,408
% Latino est. 20%
% Spanish-Surnamed 18%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 1%
Total 1,202
% Latino est. 14%
% Spanish-Surnamed 13%
% Asian-Surnamed 2%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 83%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,636
age0-19 21%
age20-60 48%
age60plus 31%
immigrants 28%
naturalized 54%
english 71%
spanish 21%
asian-lang 4%
other lang 4%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 11%
hs-grad 26%
bachelor 33%
graduatedegree 25%
Child in Household child-under18 24%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 62%
income 0-25k 12%
income 25-50k 5%
income 50-75k 12%
income 75-200k 29%
income 200k-plus 41%
single family 96%
multi-family 4%
rented 16%
owned 84%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 2,407
44 1.86%
42%
48%
1%
6%
1,997
28%
63%
1%
7%
1,410
24%
22%
4%
3%
69%
1%
1,213
22%
20%
4%
2%
71%
1%
926
17%
16%
5%
2%
76%
1%
3,332
27%
56%
17%
24%
54%
49%
39%
3%
9%
22%
33%
21%
21%
40%
74%
2%
11%
9%
52%
26%
74%
26%
37%
63%
3 2,431
68 2.88%
33%
56%
1%
7%
1,468
19%
77%
0%
3%
1,632
19%
18%
2%
2%
78%
0%
1,431
17%
16%
2%
2%
79%
0%
1,115
14%
13%
2%
2%
82%
0%
2,261
24%
56%
21%
25%
44%
62%
36%
1%
1%
15%
28%
29%
20%
32%
72%
6%
5%
11%
42%
35%
95%
5%
16%
84%
4 2,421
58 2.45%
13%
74%
1%
9%
2,371
6%
81%
0%
10%
1,974
7%
7%
5%
1%
87%
0%
1,789
6%
6%
5%
1%
88%
0%
1,494
5%
5%
3%
1%
91%
0%
2,818
17%
43%
41%
20%
44%
84%
14%
1%
0%
3%
30%
25%
34%
19%
62%
4%
14%
5%
44%
33%
92%
8%
10%
90%
5 2,257
-106
-4.49%
32%
56%
2%
8%
1,428
10%
75%
2%
12%
1,455
18%
16%
4%
2%
74%
3%
1,272
15%
14%
4%
2%
76%
3%
952
12%
11%
4%
2%
79%
2%
1,879
14%
45%
41%
28%
44%
56%
23%
11%
10%
26%
30%
33%
13%
17%
59%
28%
17%
7%
24%
24%
55%
45%
58%
42%
Total
11,814
174

7.36%
30%
59%
1%
8%
9,189
16%
73%
1%
8%
8,083
17%
16%
4%
2%
77%
1%
7,113
15%
14%
4%
2%
79%
1%
5,689
12%
11%
3%
1%
83%
1%
12,927
21%
50%
29%
25%
49%
65%
27%
4%
5%
15%
29%
28%
23%
26%
66%
10%
11%
9%
39%
32%
83%
17%
27%
73%
12/30/2021 20:57 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
93 92
1 1
Half Moon Bay
2021 Redistricting
Map 402
National Demographics Corporation
December 16, 2021
Map layers
402
Water Area
River
Streets
©2021 CALIPER
94 402
District 1
Total Pop 3,020
Deviation from ideal 66
% Deviation 2.23%
% Hisp 30.7%
% NH White 58%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian-American 8%
Total 2,354
% Hisp 18%
% NH White 70%
% NH Black 0%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 11%
Total 2,008
% Latino est. 20%
% Spanish-Surnamed 18%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black 0%
Total 1,759
% Latino est. 18%
% Spanish-Surnamed 17%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black 0%
Total 1,474
% Latino est. 13%
% Spanish-Surnamed 12%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 83%
% NH Black est. 0%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 3,129
age0-19 19%
age20-60 46%
age60plus 35%
immigrants 30%
naturalized 52%
english 65%
spanish 22%
asian-lang 6%
other lang 7%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 16%
hs-grad 29%
bachelor 31%
graduatedegree 21%
Child in Household child-under18 21%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 61%
income 0-25k 20%
income 25-50k 10%
income 50-75k 11%
income 75-200k 27%
income 200k-plus 32%
single family 79%
multi-family 21%
rented 33%
owned 67%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 2,916
-38
-1.29%
36%
53%
1%
6%
2,403
24%
68%
2%
7%
1,814
21%
19%
4%
2%
73%
2%
1,575
19%
17%
4%
2%
74%
2%
1,215
14%
13%
4%
2%
79%
1%
3,906
26%
55%
19%
23%
54%
54%
35%
3%
8%
19%
30%
25%
22%
37%
73%
3%
10%
9%
48%
31%
79%
21%
32%
68%
3 2,936
-18
-0.61%
38%
52%
1%
7%
1,829
17%
75%
1%
6%
1,910
24%
22%
3%
2%
72%
1%
1,654
21%
19%
3%
2%
74%
2%
1,292
17%
16%
2%
2%
78%
1%
2,653
20%
49%
31%
26%
44%
59%
32%
5%
4%
19%
28%
29%
19%
24%
65%
15%
14%
9%
35%
27%
76%
24%
36%
64%
4 2,942
-12
-0.41%
14%
72%
1%
10%
2,603
8%
81%
0%
9%
2,351
7%
7%
4%
1%
87%
0%
2,125
6%
6%
4%
1%
88%
0%
1,708
5%
5%
3%
1%
90%
0%
3,238
18%
47%
35%
21%
44%
81%
18%
1%
0%
5%
30%
27%
30%
22%
66%
4%
10%
6%
44%
36%
95%
5%
8%
92%
Total
11,814
104

3.52%
30%
59%
1%
8%
9,189
16%
73%
1%
8%
8,083
17%
16%
4%
2%
77%
1%
7,113
15%
14%
4%
2%
79%
1%
5,689
12%
11%
3%
1%
83%
1%
12,927
21%
50%
29%
25%
49%
65%
27%
4%
5%
15%
29%
28%
23%
26%
66%
10%
11%
9%
39%
32%
83%
17%
27%
73%
12/30/2021 20:58 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
95 92
1 1
Half Moon Bay
2021 Redistricting
Map 403b
National Demographics Corporation
December 16, 2021
Map layers
403b
Water Area
River
Streets
©2021 CALIPER
96 403b
District 1
Total Pop 2,851
Deviation from ideal -103
% Deviation -3.49%
% Hisp 30.5%
% NH White 58%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian-American 8%
Total 2,269
% Hisp 18%
% NH White 70%
% NH Black 0%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 11%
Total 1,951
% Latino est. 20%
% Spanish-Surnamed 18%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black 0%
Total 1,708
% Latino est. 18%
% Spanish-Surnamed 17%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 78%
% NH Black 0%
Total 1,432
% Latino est. 13%
% Spanish-Surnamed 12%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 83%
% NH Black est. 0%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,990
age0-19 19%
age20-60 46%
age60plus 34%
immigrants 30%
naturalized 52%
english 66%
spanish 22%
asian-lang 5%
other lang 7%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 15%
hs-grad 29%
bachelor 31%
graduatedegree 21%
Child in Household child-under18 21%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 61%
income 0-25k 20%
income 25-50k 10%
income 50-75k 11%
income 75-200k 28%
income 200k-plus 32%
single family 80%
multi-family 20%
rented 32%
owned 68%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 2,916
-38
-1.29%
36%
53%
1%
6%
2,403
24%
68%
2%
7%
1,814
21%
19%
4%
2%
73%
2%
1,575
19%
17%
4%
2%
74%
2%
1,215
14%
13%
4%
2%
79%
1%
3,906
26%
55%
19%
23%
54%
54%
35%
3%
8%
19%
30%
25%
22%
37%
73%
3%
10%
9%
48%
31%
79%
21%
32%
68%
3 3,005
51 1.73%
33%
56%
1%
8%
1,813
16%
77%
1%
6%
1,980
18%
17%
3%
3%
76%
1%
1,739
16%
15%
3%
2%
78%
1%
1,284
13%
12%
3%
2%
80%
1%
2,650
21%
52%
26%
26%
44%
57%
35%
4%
4%
20%
28%
30%
17%
27%
68%
15%
10%
10%
35%
29%
78%
22%
35%
65%
4 3,042
88 2.98%
19%
68%
1%
9%
2,704
9%
79%
0%
9%
2,338
11%
11%
4%
1%
84%
0%
2,091
10%
10%
4%
1%
85%
0%
1,758
8%
8%
3%
1%
88%
0%
3,380
17%
44%
39%
21%
44%
81%
16%
2%
1%
5%
30%
26%
31%
20%
63%
6%
13%
6%
43%
33%
91%
9%
13%
87%
Total
11,814
191

6.47%
30%
59%
1%
8%
9,189
16%
73%
1%
8%
8,083
17%
16%
4%
2%
77%
1%
7,113
15%
14%
4%
2%
79%
1%
5,689
12%
11%
3%
1%
83%
1%
12,927
21%
50%
29%
25%
49%
65%
27%
4%
5%
15%
29%
28%
23%
26%
66%
10%
11%
9%
39%
32%
83%
17%
27%
73%
12/30/2021 20:58 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
97 Half Moon Bay Golf Links
92 1
1 Half Moon Bay
2021 Redistricting
Existing Districts
National Demographics Corporation
December 17, 2021
Map layers
Current Districts
Landmark Point
Landmark Area
Water Area
River
Streets
©2017 CALIPER
98 HMB Current Districts
District 1
Total Pop 3,044
Deviation from ideal 90
% Deviation 3.05%
% Hisp 28.8%
% NH White 59%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian-American 8%
Total 2,411
% Hisp 17%
% NH White 71%
% NH Black 1%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 11%
Total 2,157
% Latino est. 20%
% Spanish-Surnamed 18%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 76%
% NH Black 1%
Total 1,889
% Latino est. 18%
% Spanish-Surnamed 17%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 77%
% NH Black 1%
Total 1,519
% Latino est. 14%
% Spanish-Surnamed 13%
% Asian-Surnamed 3%
% Filipino-Surnamed 1%
% NH White est. 82%
% NH Black est. 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 3,146
age0-19 19%
age20-60 46%
age60plus 35%
immigrants 30%
naturalized 52%
english 65%
spanish 22%
asian-lang 6%
other lang 7%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 16%
hs-grad 29%
bachelor 31%
graduatedegree 21%
Child in Household child-under18 20%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 61%
income 0-25k 21%
income 25-50k 10%
income 50-75k 10%
income 75-200k 27%
income 200k-plus 32%
single family 77%
multi-family 23%
rented 34%
owned 66%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 2,756
-198
-6.70%
38%
51%
1%
6%
2,307
24%
66%
2%
8%
1,628
21%
19%
4%
2%
72%
2%
1,405
19%
18%
4%
2%
74%
2%
1,103
15%
14%
4%
2%
78%
2%
3,737
26%
55%
19%
23%
54%
53%
35%
3%
9%
20%
31%
25%
22%
37%
72%
3%
10%
9%
47%
30%
76%
24%
35%
65%
3 2,773
-181
-6.13%
43%
48%
1%
7%
1,518
23%
71%
1%
5%
1,650
27%
25%
3%
2%
69%
1%
1,417
23%
22%
3%
2%
71%
1%
1,092
18%
17%
3%
2%
76%
1%
2,422
21%
52%
27%
27%
44%
56%
36%
5%
4%
21%
28%
30%
17%
28%
68%
15%
10%
10%
35%
29%
79%
21%
35%
65%
4 3,241
287

9.72%
13%
75%
1%
9%
2,953
7%
82%
0%
9%
2,648
7%
6%
4%
1%
88%
0%
2,402
6%
6%
4%
1%
89%
0%
1,975
5%
5%
3%
1%
91%
0%
3,621
18%
46%
37%
21%
44%
81%
17%
1%
0%
5%
29%
26%
31%
21%
65%
4%
12%
6%
44%
34%
94%
6%
10%
90%
Total
11,814
485

16.42%
30%
59%
1%
8%
9,189
16%
73%
1%
8%
8,083
17%
16%
4%
2%
77%
1%
7,113
15%
14%
4%
2%
79%
1%
5,689
12%
11%
3%
1%
83%
1%
12,927
21%
50%
29%
25%
49%
65%
27%
4%
5%
15%
29%
28%
23%
26%
66%
10%
11%
9%
39%
32%
83%
17%
27%
73%
11/07/2021 20:23 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
99 3
5 2
4 1
Half Moon Bay Golf Links
Frenchmans Creek Community Park
Smith Fld
Ocean View Ave Park
Pilarcitos Crk
Frenchman S Crk
Arroyo Canada Verde
Leon Crk
Half Moon Bay High School
Miramontes Point Rd
Silver Ave
Venice Blvd
M
ain
St
Wave Ave
1 Bloom Ln
Kehoe Ave
Saint Joseph Ave
1 92
Kelly Ave
Amesport Lndg
Touraine Ln
Kelly St
Poplar St
Redondo Beach Rd
Fairway Dr
Frenchmans Creek Rd
Casa del Mar Dr
Ashdown Pl
Grove St
Seymour St
Correas St
Miramontes Ave
Dolores Ave
N
Main
St
Laurel Ave
Alcatraz A
Van Ness Ave
Madenhair Walk
Grand Blvd
Cardoza Ave
San Pablo Ave
2nd Ave 1st Ave
4th Ave 3rd Ave
Young Ave
Mill St
Spyglass Ct
Washington Blvd
Grandview
Blvd
el Paseo
Bark
Ct
Bernardo Ave
5th Ave
W
a
y
Map 504c
Registered Voters Deferred
from 2022 to 2024: 993
Population Deferred: 1,351
Map layers
504c
Current Districts
Landmark Point
Landmark Area
Water Area
River
Streets
©2021 CALIPER
Population Accelerated: 2,334
100
3 5
2 4
1 Frenchman S Crk
Pilarcitos Crk Leon Crk
Arroyo Canada Verde
Arroyo de en Medio
Half Moon Bay High School
Amesport Lndg
1 Miramontes Point Rd
Silver Ave
Venice Blvd
M
ain
St
Wave Ave
1 Alto Ave
Kehoe Ave
Saint Joseph Ave
92 Pinehurst Ln
Kelly Ave
Touraine Ln
Kelly St
1 Poplar St
Wavecrest Rd
Frenchmans Creek Rd
Casa del Mar Dr
Ashdown Pl
Grove St
Seymour St
Mizzen Ln
Correas St
Dolores Ave
N
Main
St
Ar
nold
Wa
y
Miramontes Ave
Garcia Ave
Laurel Ave
Van Ness Ave
San Pablo Ave
1st Ave
2nd Ave
4th Ave 3rd Ave
Young Ave
Mill St
Filbert St
Spyglass Ct
Washington Blvd
St James Ave
Ralston Ave
Bark
Ct
Bernardo Ave
Santa Rosa Ave
Driftwood Trl
5th Ave
isim
a
Wa
y
Map 503b
Registered Voters Deferred
from 2022 to 2024: 695
Population Deferred: 843
Map layers
503b
Current Districts
Landmark Point
Water Area
River
Streets
©2021 CALIPER
Population Accelerated: 1,534
101
3 2
4 1 Pilarcitos
Crk
Leon
Crk
Frenchman
Half Moon Bay High School
Public Elem School
Amesport Lndg
Bev Cunha's Country Rd
Silver Ave
Venice Blvd
M
ain
S
t
Wave Ave
1 Bloom Ln
Terrace Ave
Kehoe Ave
Saint Joseph Ave
1 92
Pinehurst
Fa
Ln
irway Pl
Beach Ave
Kelly Ave Kelly St
Belleville
Blvd
Filbert St
Poplar St
Redondo Beach Rd
Turnberry Rd
Myrtle
Metzgar St
Casa del Mar Dr
Spruce St
Myrtle St
Wavecrest Rd
Magnolia St
nnaker Ln
Correas St
Miramontes Ave
Dolores Ave
N
Main
St
Garcia Ave
Valdez Ave
Willow Ave
Pine Ave
Van Ness Ave
Grand Blvd
Cardoza Ave
1st Ave
2nd Ave
4th Ave
3rd Ave
Colonel Way
Mill St
b Ct
Bernardo Ave
Flo
ren
ce
Ave
5th Ave
erness Rd
Map 403b
Registered Voters Deferred
from 2022 to 2024: 1,202
Population Deferred: 1,498
Map layers
403b
Current Districts
Landmark Point
Water Area
River
Streets
©2021 CALIPER
Population Accelerated: 1,106
102
Pilarcitos Crk
Frenchman S Crk
Arroyo Canada Verde
Leon
Crk
Half Moon Bay High School
Amesport Lndg
Miramontes Point Rd
Silver Av
V
e
enice Blvd
M
ain
S
t
Wave Ave
1 Bloom Ln
Kehoe Ave
Saint Joseph Ave
1 92
Pinehurst Ln
Kelly Ave Kelly St
Poplar St
Redondo Beach Rd
Casa del Mar Dr
Ashdown Pl
Myrtle St
Wavecrest Rd
Grove St
izzen Ln
Correas St
Dolores Ave
Laurel Ave
Van Ness Ave
N Main St
2nd Ave
4th Ave 3rd Ave
Spyglass Ct
el Paseo
ig Ct
Colonel Way
Bernardo Ave
Map 402
Registered Voters Deferred
from 2022 to 2024: 1,229
Population Deferred: 1,493
Map layers
402
Current Districts
Landmark Point
Water Area
River
Streets
©2021 CALIPER
Population Accelerated: 1,270
103
Half Moon Bay Redistricting Advisory Committee
Additional Commentary to City Council, February 15, 2022 This report was designed to complement the factual account of the committee’s work that was provided in the Staff Report to the February 15 City Council meeting and was attached to the agenda packet for that meeting.

Committee Members:

Marin Holt, Chair
Paul Gater, Vice Chair
Hal Bogner, Committee Member
Steve Maller, Committee Member
Phil Marshall, Committee Member
Claudia Marshall, Committee Member
Michal Settles, Committee Member
Final Report Subcommittee Members (appointed at 1/27 RAC Meeting); Marin Holt, Chair
Paul Gater, Vice Chair
Phil Marshall, Committee Member
I. Identified Communities of Interest
A. Geographic communities of interest:

Frenchmans Creek, Casa del Mar / Kehoe, Downtown, Cypress Cove, Pilarcitos Park (neighborhood behind Tres Amigos restaurant), Arleta Park, Alsace Lorraine, Ocean Colony, Canada Cove (with area near Senior Center on Main St) B. Socio‐economic communities of interest:

Seniors, and the Latino community.

II. Further Description of Socio‐economic Communities of Interest A. The Senior Community
Three distinct sub‐communities of seniors were identified during committee discussions and public comment, namely the residents of the housing adjacent to the Senior Center on Main Street, the senior residents of Canada Cove, and the senior residents of Ocean Colony.

In our judgment the challenges faced by the seniors living in Canada Cove are more similar to those living on Main St than those living in Ocean Colony, and so it makes sense to consider them as a single “community of interest” and place them in the same district where collectively they will have a stronger voice.

Ocean Colony has quite different demographics, and is physically separated from both Canada Cove and Main Street.
104
The selected map 504c the seniors of Ocean Colony would remain as a major constituency within District 4, while the smaller groups of Canada Cove and South Main Street residents would be able to band together and be heard by their District 3 representative. It’s worth noting that in Half Moon Bay you need 2 councilmembers to get something on the agenda under our city council rules ‐ and so map 504c ought to yield strong representation of the senior community in Southern Half Moon Bay by both the District 3 and District 4 city councilmembers.

B. The Latino Community
The Latino community in Half Moon Bay is connected by shared language, culture, and economic challenges, and so we established it as a local community of interest as well as a federally protected class.

We determined that it is not possible to draw a district with more than 50% of the citizens of voting age as Hispanic, meaning that the Latino vote in Half Moon Bay is unavoidably "cracked" across all the districts (no matter whether there are 4 or 5).

However, some maps dilute the representation of the Latino community more than others, and we did take the degree of dilution into account when selecting our focus maps.

Map 504c contains two districts, District 1 and District 2 (both in the Northern half of the city) whose electorate is 20‐30% Hispanic; District 2 and District 3 are both 40% Hispanic by total population. (See the table below.) By these numbers, these three districts should have council members who are sensitive to the impacts of City policy and ordinances on the Latino community, and who recognize that their election depends on successful representation of the Latino community in their districts.

Table highlighting the high Hispanic total population and CVAP fractions in the districts 1, 2 and 3 of Map 504c. 105
III.   Map Recommendation
The committee selected map 504c because it is the best option for preserving the contiguity of communities of interest both geographic and socioeconomic while maintaining population balance.

IV.   Rationale for 5 Districts Versus 4
A. 5 Districts: The district system was brought in to increase the voting power of communities of interest and to reduce their disenfranchisement. Having only four districts plus a city‐wide elected Mayor would naturally diminish that thrust.

We also confirmed experimentally that it is harder to draw district boundaries that preserve communities of interest in a 4‐district map than in a 5 ‐district map.  We concluded that the 5‐district system is better able to mitigate disenfranchisement than the 4‐districts system.

B. Rotating Mayor: We noted that while the elected Mayor in the current system is not a “strong Mayor” (with Half Moon Bay continuing to follow a City Council plus Manager model), the mayor does, in practice, have some additional power relative to other Council members (for example greater influence over the agenda of City Council meetings, and running of the meetings themselves).

Having a rotating Mayor limits the power of any one person on the Council and encourages the Council to work together. It also gives the representatives, as the voice of all the different districts, a greater role compared with just a single Mayor who may be more likely to just represent the majority view: it’s a more equitable system.

V.   On Voter “Deferment” as a Result of Election Re‐sequencing Large census blocks and communities of interest, and in particular moving from 4 districts to 5, make it hard to “just move 200 voters” from District 4 to District 3. A group of several hundred residents, likely many more than 200, was always going to suffer deferment as a consequence of the redistricting process.

With map 504c some areas of the city will be represented by a councilmember in 2022 that residents of those areas didn’t vote for in 2020. That does not mean they will not be well represented. We observed that it would seem appropriate for the current District 2 and 3 council members (who are not up for reelection in 2022) to make extra effort to reach out to their new constituents in order to mitigate the deferment problem. For example, there is a new relationship to build, between the District 3 council member and their new senior constituents.

VI.   Practical Constraints: Census Block Size, Population Balance, and Contiguity Because Half Moon Bay is a small city divided into even smaller City Council districts, the presence of large area and/or large population census blocks presents some obstacles to the drawing of district boundaries. Splitting up these large census blocks would make it significantly easier to draw maps that preserve communities of interest. 106
As well as forcing large numbers of people over a wide geographical area into the same district, large blocks have knock‐on effects in drawing other areas of the map, because of the population balance requirement. In particular:
‐ Block 2046 covers most of the land area in district 1, stretching all the way from the High School to North of Spindrift Way, and contains 1064 citizens of voting age ‐ which is unusually high for the HMB map.
‐ There are several other census blocks with CVAP 200‐500 that it would be helpful to split into several smaller units: Block 1000 (Venice Beach to Highway 1, CVAP 348), Block 1013 (CVAP 393, most of Pilarcitos Park), Block 3000 (CVAP 481, Main St Senior Center, Bloom Lane, Arroyo de Leon), Block 2000 (CVAP 493, land between Arleta Park and Ocean Colony).
‐ Note that had Block 2000 been split into smaller units, we could have more straightforwardly moved 200 D4 voters into D3, for a closer‐to‐status‐quo outcome.
‐ Some large census blocks contain “islands” of voters that cannot be districted separately from the block that encloses them. This is a potentially disenfranchising feature that seems unnecessary: splitting the surrounding block, or extending the island so that it is connected to a “mainland”, would remove these islands and make it easier to draw maps that keep communities of interest together.
‐ For example, Block 2011 (the South‐East corner of Ocean Colony, citizen of voting age population 204) completely encloses Block 2014 (Troon Way, CVAP 84). The residents of Troon Way arguably have more in common with those of Canada Cove to the South than Ocean Colony to the West, but cannot currently be districted away from Block 2011.
‐ Block 2046 (see above) also contains two small “islands” (Blocks 2047 and 2049) that cannot be separated from it. Splitting this block into ~10 smaller units could reconnect these islands and bring greater flexibility to the map drawing. ‐ We hope that the City would petition the census bureau to make these changes before the next census, in order to better enable the drawing of fairer district maps.
107
Example of problem area: Detail from map
504c illustrating various census block
features that hamper the drawing of fair
and representative maps. Northern HMB is
dominated by two large census blocks, Block
1000 (CVAP 348) in District 2 (blue shading),
and Block 2046 (CVAP 1064) in District 1
(red shading). Note that Block 2046
contains several “islands” that cannot be
districted separately from Block 2046
(because districts must be contiguous).

VII.   Additional recommendation regarding the communities of Moonridge and Miramar:

In our discussions we observed that both Moonridge and part of the Miramar neighborhood are so closely associated with the City of Half Moon Bay that it didn’t make sense that they were not incorporated in the city. Examples of these associations include their location (Moonridge is on the east side of Highway 1 directly opposite the incorporated areas of Ocean Colony and Canada Cove and the practicalities of living there (for example they are in the same school district as Half Moon Bay; they use the same bus services).

We hope that the City of Half Moon Bay and the County of San Mateo will explore the incorporation of Moonridge and the northern part of Miramar into the City of Half Moon Bay so that the residents of these two areas can be represented by what is, in practice, already “their” City Council.
108
1 Jessica Blair
From: sharonlowry < >
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2022 12:49 PM
To: Jessica Blair
Subject: HMB Redistricting Process
[CAUTION]: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Ms. Blair:

Canada Cove should not be separated from Ocean Colony.  Please seriously consider the 503b alternative map.  Thank you.

Sharon Lowry
Canada Cove Resident
Sent from Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
109
1 Jessica Blair
From: Glenn Kesselman < >
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2022 6:36 AM
To: Jessica Blair
Subject: Redistributing
[CAUTION]: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Ms Blair,
I am writing to you today to express our desire to maintain the existing voting district with Ocean Colony.

We are against the proposed gerrymandering with the senior center.

Canada Cove and Ocean Colony share emergency services planning, are collocated, geographically located, and share a high percentage of seniors.

Regards,
Glenn & Karen Kesselman
Half Moon Bay, CA 94019
Regards,
Glenn Kesselman
110
1 Jessica Blair
From: Ellen Chiri < >
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 6:24 PM
To: Jessica Blair
Subject: Public Input to the City Council: redistricting Map 504c vs Map 503b [CAUTION]: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I join my neighbors in urging the Redistricting Advisory Committee to continue discussions as it considers its final redistricting recommendation to the City Council, and to clarify the reasoning behind the resulting recommendation.

If it is correct that Map 504c is the preferred map, I need to understand why. The peculiar borders of its proposed District 3 separate Cañada Cove from its contiguous neighbor, Ocean Colony.

Is the purpose of proposed district 3 on Map 504c to link senior community Cañada Cove with the senior community two miles away? A Cañada Cove resident researched the senior population in the two proposed district 3 boundaries, and reported that proposed district 3 on Map 504c contains fewer seniors than does proposed district 3 on Map 503b, by a significant factor.
 If  that reported population is accurate, and the goal is to link senior communities, the peculiar boundary of proposed districts on map 504c becomes even more curious.  If  the goal is not to link the two senior communities, what is the purpose of connecting Cañada Cove with south HMB via that thin thread of land, and disconnecting it from its contiguous neighbor, Ocean Colony?

Ellen Chiri
Cañada Cove resident
Virus-free. www.avg.com
111
112
113
1 Jessica Blair
From: Kathleen Ferenz >
Sent: Monday, February 7, 2022 7:13 AM
To: Jessica Blair
Subject: Comment to City Council on Redistricting
[CAUTION]: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Please consider my public comment to the city council on redistricting for the upcoming meeting in your decision.

I’m Kathleen Ferenz resident in Canada Cove. Please don’t take our vote away. This is Canada Cove’s year to vote for Council.  I’m requesting that you adopt Redistricting Map 503b and keep my community in District 4.

Sincerely
Kathleen Ferenz
Half Moon Bay
114
1 Jessica Blair
From: Chip B. Goldstein < >
Sent: Monday, February 7, 2022 7:20 AM
To: Jessica Blair
Subject: Comment to City Council re Redistricting - support of Map 504c [CAUTION]: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

We live in Canada Cove, and we are encouraging the City Council to adopt Redistricting Map 504c as per the final report of the RAC, It makes sense to us for Canada Cove to be aligned with the south Main Street area rather than with Ocean Colony.

Thank you,
Dr. Chip B.& Linda B. Goldstein

115
116
1 Jessica Blair
From:

Sent: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 7:44 AM
To: Jessica Blair
Subject: Comment to City Council on Redistricting
[CAUTION]: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

My name is Susan Engard and I live in Canada Cove. Please don't take away our right to vote. This is Canada Cove's year to vote for Council. We need you to adopt Redistricting Map 503b and keep us in District 4. Thank you for your attention.
117
1 Jessica Blair
From:

Sent: Monday, February 7, 2022 1:44 PM
To: Jessica Blair
Subject: Comment to City Council on Redistricting
[CAUTION]: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Ms. Blair, my name is Roberta Kendall and I live at Canada Cove. I was astounded to find out about this issue and the fact that our vote can be taken away this fall.

This is Canada Cove's year to vote for Council. We need you to adopt Redistricting Map 503b and keep us in District 4. The fact that this might not happen is stunning and hard to believe.

I work full time and I vote in every election. Please do your part in helping the folks in Canada Cove to stay in District 4.

Sincerely, Roberta Kendall
118
1 Jessica Blair
From: JLogan < >
Sent: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 10:53 AM
To: Jessica Blair
Subject: Comment to City Council re Redistricting - support of Map 504c [CAUTION]: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Jessica: Please include this communication in the City Council packet relating to their consideration of the Redistricting options.

I am a resident of Cañada Cove in Half Moon Bay. By this communication I am encouraging the City Council to adopt Redistricting Map 504c as per the final report of the RAC.

Reflection and physical evaluation of the area included in the new District 3 defined in Redistricting Map 504c leads to my support of the thoughtful work done by the Redistricting Advisory Committee.

While it is disappointing that the Cañada Cove community will experience a 6 year gap in voting for our representative - there is benefit now and in the long term.

Continued appreciation for the complex tasks and decisions that you wrestle with on behalf of all of us.

Joyce Logan
119
1 Jessica Blair
From: Pat Black < >
Sent: Monday, February 7, 2022 2:31 PM
To: Jessica Blair
Cc: Pat Black
Subject: Comment on City Council Redistructing
[CAUTION]: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Ms. Blair
Pat Black, resident of Canada Cove.

Please prevent my vote which is being threatened  to be taken away! I Recommend the adoption of Redisticting Map 503b and keep Canada Cove in District 4 Best regards, Pat Black Half Moon Bay
Sent from my iPhone
A Woman's work is never done! One day at a Time!
With a Peacefull Heart
᤻᤻᤻᤹᤹᤹᤺᤺᤺🇺🇸᤻᤻᤻᤹᤹᤹᤺᤺᤺
120
1 Jessica Blair
From: Robert Holloway < >
Sent: Monday, February 7, 2022 6:31 PM
To: Jessica Blair
Subject: Comment to City Council on Redistricting
[CAUTION]: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To the city council of Half Moon Bay:

I live in Canada Cove, . I think the gerrymandered mapping of Canada Cove into the south end of Main street, ostensibly to amplify the voice of seniors, ill‐considered. Perhaps unbeknownst to council members, CC citizens and Ocean Colony residents share many activities (community orchestral and choral music and art to name a couple) and I personally have far fewer connections with Senior Center dwellers. I have not consulted the 2020 census, but I don't think it's obvious or likely that a district constructed to couple CC and the Senior Center actually improves senior representation. I am especially annoyed, too, that were the council to adopt the gerrymandered map (a thin fiber connecting two remote masses), CC would not be able to vote in upcoming District 4 matters for another 2 years, amounting to SIX years without being able to vote in a district matter! Council, please realize that, while well‐intended, the less compact, more fragmented map is not a good idea. Remember how such maps invite ridicule in numerous articles decrying political malpractice.

Respectfully and hopefully yours,
Robert Holloway, PhD
121
1 Jessica Blair
From: Elizabeth Strobel < >
Sent: Monday, February 7, 2022 7:17 PM
To: Jessica Blair
Subject: Comment to City Council on Redistricting
[CAUTION]: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

My name is Elizabeth Strobel and I live in Canada Cove. In fact I have lived in this community since 1976. Always supporting the local businesses, worked here and have donated here to those in need. Therefore I feel that not only I, but everyone in this community has the right to have their voice/vote counted. This is beginning to look a lot like what our individual States are doing to voters across this country. We may be older here, but we do have every right to be a part of the voting system. Please do NOT mesh us in with Ocean Colony and Please do NOT take our vote away.

Sincerely,
Elizabeth Strobel
122
1 Jessica Blair
From: Julie Kline
Sent: Monday, February 7, 2022 8:13 PM
To: Jessica Blair
Subject: Comment to City Council on Redistricting
[CAUTION]: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

My name is Julie Kline, and I live in Canada Cove where we haven’t voted for Council since 2018. Under proposed district boundaries, we will lose our vote until 2024! That is outrageous, completly unacceptable, and completely unnecessary.

This is Canada Cove’s year to vote for Council.  I urge Council to adopt Redistricting Map 503b and keep Canada Cove in District 4.  Please don’t take our vote away.

Sincerely,
Julie Kline
123
1 Jessica Blair
From: Terry Kujawa < >
Sent: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 9:15 AM
To: Jessica Blair
Subject: redistricting
[CAUTION]: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Terry Kujawa, Canada Cove: I do not want to wait years to vote for changes. Please keep Canada Cove in redistricing map 503, district 4. The perception that we do not have much money and that we are not as educated as the people who live in Ocean Colony, is a fallacy.

Our voting record is unparalleled as is our volunteerism.

124
1 Jessica Blair
From: Kristina Beckman < >
Sent: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 10:33 AM
To: Jessica Blair
Subject: Redistricting
[CAUTION]: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Jessica,
I live in Canada Cove and am concerned about the possibility of gerrymandering in HMB. I am not a fan of such redistricting practices, as they seem to do more harm than good throughout the country. I think our town in particular, is best served by having each voting section be represented by a diversity of constituents. Taking Canada Cove out of the district it is in now, which reflects the entire population of our town, and lumping it into a mostly senior and low income district, could leave us with just one common issue, need, or cause, rather than reflecting a multitude of concerns.

In addition to not wanting to be separated from HMB as a whole, I want to have my voice counted in the next election rather than having to wait until the following election.

Therefore, I am putting my request forth to you and asking that the council adopts Redistricting Map 503b, keeping my Canada Cove community in district 4.

Thank you for your time,
Sincerely,
Kristina Beckman
Half Moon Bay, CA 94019
125
1 Jessica Blair
From: Gayla Worrell < >
Sent: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 10:57 AM
To: Jessica Blair
Subject: Comment to City Council on Redistricting
[CAUTION]: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hello,
My name is Gayla Worrell and I live in Canada Cove.  Please don't take our vote away.  This is Canada Cove's year to vote for Council.  We need you to adopt Redistricting Map 503b and keep us in District 4.

Thank you,
Gayla
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Gayla Worrell

HMB, CA
126
1 Jessica Blair
From: Ellen Chiri < >
Sent: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 5:44 PM
To: Jessica Blair
Subject: City Council: Comment on redistricting
[CAUTION]: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

I live in Cañada Cove, and I request that you adopt redistricting map 503b, which leaves us in District 4.

The primary reason for my request is the loss of our 2022 vote. If we change districts, Cañada Cove residents must wait until 2024 to vote in a Council election.

Fueling my current frustration is the last election, in which I campaigned enthusiastically for the Council candidate of my choice, but couldn't vote for that candidate because of district boundaries.

I support a return to at‐large voting at some point, hoping that the spurious threatened lawsuit is no longer a threat. I believe that at‐large voting best serves the community at large.

Respectfully,
Ellen Chiri
Virus-free. www.avg.com
127
1 Jessica Blair
From: Sue Santoro < >
Sent: Wednesday, February 9, 2022 5:10 PM
To: Jessica Blair
Subject: Comment to City council on Redistricting
[CAUTION]: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

My name is Sue Santoro. I am a senior and I live in Canada Cove Mobile Home Park. Please don't take my vote away! This year Canada Cove residents would have the opportunity to vote for Council. We haven't voted for Council since 2018. We need you to adopt Redistricting Map 503b and keep us in District 4. I feel this is the best way to ensure that our right to vote is honored.

Sincerely,
Sue B Santoro
Half Moon Bay
128
1 Jessica Blair
From: Sandra Sandoval < >
Sent: Wednesday, February 9, 2022 9:17 PM
To: Jessica Blair
Subject: Votes at Canada Cove
[CAUTION]: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

We need for Canada Cove (our wonderful Senior park) to be kept in District 4.   We live there.  Why should we be denied a vote.  This is a terrible move implemented by the polticially motivated rich people at Ocean Colony.  They say that they have more people living there but include non‐voters like  children.  Just because we are SENIORS we are being harassed and discriminated against.  How unfair is this???
We need you to do adopt Redistricting Map 503b and keep us in the District in which we have ALWAYS voted .

Our address is
Sincerely yours,
Kathryn Szydlowski and Sandra Sandoval
129

BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY

AGENDA REPORT
For meeting of: February 15, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
VIA: Bob Nisbet, City Manager
FROM: John Doughty, Public Works Director
Maz Bozorginia, City Engineer
TITLE: POPLAR STREET--DEFERRED STREET IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS ______________________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council:
1) Request staff send letters to the owners of the 20 parcels on Poplar Street with existing Deferred Street Improvement Agreements (Agreements) indicating the City’s intent to seek payment for a portion of the deferred frontage improvements in conjunction with the Poplar Street Traffic Calming and Safety Project (Poplar Project); and 2) Direct staff to return to the City Council within 90 days to formalize the methodology of allocating and calculating costs for each parcel and alternatives for installment payment plans.

FISCAL IMPACT:

After receiving direction from the City Council, staff will return to the Council to provide an estimate of the contribution toward the cost of the Project from the 21 parcels within the boundaries of the Poplar Project with Agreements. Staff conservatively estimates that the Agreements would provide approximately $250,000 toward the project cost.

STRATEGIC ELEMENT:

Seeking deferred improvement payments supports the Infrastructure and Environment & Healthy Communities and Public Safety Elements of the Strategic Plan.

OVERVIEW:

The State of California began regulating the subdivision of land in 1893 due to the migration of population westward and rampant land speculation associated with the westward expansion.

The original Map Act (Act) was a single page which required that a formal map be recorded depicting streets and lots to be sold. The Act was updated in the subsequent decades to require a formal survey, approval by the City (if the property is located within) and the filing of 130

maps with the County Recorder. Since 1937, the State Subdivision Map Act has required that a local jurisdiction (City or County) is to ensure the construction of public improvements within a subdivision. The Act requires that the local jurisdiction adopt an Ordinance to implement the Map Act. The City’s subdivision ordinance is contained in Title 17 of the Half Moon Bay Municipal Code.

Many subdivisions in Half Moon Bay were platted prior to the 1937 Act, driven by speculation with the rail line. Many of the traditional neighborhoods of Half Moon Bay date back to the early 1900s, prior to the modern Act. Today, there are many hundreds of recorded (often referred to as “paper” lots) in the City that do not meet various standards including having public utilities or improved streets. Upon incorporation (or subsequent annexation), the City assumed regulatory control of these subdivisions and ownership of the right-of-way. City maintenance obligations have generally been limited to those areas where the County or City have formally accepted the improvements.

Since 1937, the City/County has required the construction of public improvements in conjunction with subdivisions of land. Typically, the improvements include sewer, water and other utilities and, at a minimum, improved access. The requirements for improved access have evolved over time in response to the adoption of Fire Safety Codes, storm water conveyance/treatment, the Americans with Disabilities Act (and State accessibility standards) and basic aesthetic and lifestyle considerations. Public improvements have evolved substantively over the last forty years including movement away from rural standards (like rolled or no curbs and non-ADA compliant walkways) for urban subdivisions. As such, what was considered an acceptable and legal street design/improvement at the time of the recording of a map, may no longer be legally acceptable or desirable in the community. Many residents reach out to Public Works to inquire about building sidewalks and paving on-street parking.

The Half Moon Bay Municipal Code Section 14.12.020 requires public improvements (streets and utilities) at the time of development (building permit issuance) or the recording of an agreement deferring such improvements. Street frontage improvements today include utilities (wet and dry), curb, gutter, sidewalk and pavement to centerline. It is unusual today for infill development to require full paving to centerline due to the existence of a paved street; however, the other improvements are common. Over the last several years, City staff have focused on requiring the construction of frontage improvements rather than deferral of improvements through recordation of an Agreement.

Over the course of the last four decades, the City has allowed approximately 280 individual property owners to defer construction of street improvements along their frontage (not included with the original subdivision) through the approval/recordation of a Deferred Street Improvement Agreement (Agreement). Of these, there are twenty (20) located on the Poplar Street corridor for 21 total parcels (one of which is a duplex that recorded a single agreement for both lots). The deferrals were granted ostensibly to ensure that the improvements would be constructed in conjunction with other nearby private properties and/or when the City was proposing to construct or re-construct the adjoining street(s). From its research, staff can 131

ascertain that the Municipal Code provisions were created to allow owners seeking to build on a partially improved street to take advantage of economy of scale construction costs and to ensure continuity of the complete street improvements.

While the terms and form have changed over time, there are three basic tenants of the Agreements: 1) the owners, upon request, are required to construct the deferred frontage improvements to City standards; 2) the owners, upon request, are required to fund the cost of deferred frontage improvements; and 3) the owners agree not to protest the formation of a Benefit Assessment District formed to construct the deferred frontage improvements.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

Poplar Project
In 2017, the City received a grant in the amount of $1.2 million from the One Bay Area Grant (OBAG) program. The grant funds were directed to improving connectivity along Poplar Street from Main Street to Railroad Avenue; notably, constructing an accessible path of travel for seniors to and from Poplar beach and for school children heading east and west to local public/private schools. Following award/acceptance of the grant funds, the City created the Poplar Street Traffic Calming and Safety Project in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

Poplar Street is designated as Primary Coastal Access Route in the Certified Local Coastal Plan which acknowledges the regional coastal serving access role the Poplar Street plays. In other words, Poplar Street is more than a local street.

Staff has been working with the community since that time to design a context sensitive streetscape for the Poplar Street corridor. Design costs have been borne by the City’s General Fund. Unfortunately, Covid-19 budget reductions required the Project to be placed on hiatus for almost 18-months. The $1.2 million OBAG grant is aging and time is of the essence to bid and construct or lose the funding. The grant funding reduces City funding as well as the funding which may be derived from the Agreements.

On February 8, 2022, the Planning Commission unanimously (3-0) approved a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) for the Poplar Project. The Planning Commission approval included design changes which will improve the streetscape and likely reduce the total cost of the project. This is an important milestone in the process as it allows the Public Works to proceed with 95-percent design plans and bid documents. These next steps (plus the actual bid) are critical to retention of the $1.2 million grant.

The Project is currently at 65-percent design. Upon issuance of the CDP, staff anticipates issuance of final plans and bid documents within 120-days. An engineer’s estimate of cost will be prepared in conjunction with the 95-percent design plans. Staff has been clear from the beginning that the grant funds would not be sufficient to cover Poplar Project costs; construction costs have continued to escalate since the grant award. Staff is evaluating phasing options to preserve the grant funding and meet major safety and access objectives in FY 2022-

23. Staff has been evaluating all funding options to include in the FY 2022-2023 CIP and Capital 132

Budget. Poplar Street is designated as a Primary Coastal Access Route in the Certified LCP.

Staff is focusing on restricted transportation funding (i.e. Gas Tax and SB1) and other local contributions including funds derived over time from the twenty (20) Deferred Street Improvement Agreements to supplement the grant funds. Deferred Street Improvement Agreements are discussed in greater detail below.

Poplar Street Deferred Street Improvement Agreements. Tonight, staff is recommending concurrence from the Council to initiate “calling” of the Agreements and assume that the Poplar Project budget will incorporate anticipated funds from the twenty (20) Deferred Street Improvement Agreements located within the boundaries of the Project. Attachment 1 includes a map of the Poplar Street Agreements. Attachment 2 includes a listing of the APNs, addresses and owners of the parcels. Attachment 3 includes a copy of each of the twenty Agreements.

At present, staff cannot give a firm estimate of the total project cost as we are only at 65- percent design. Additionally, the Planning Commission approval included substantive design changes that have not been yet incorporated into plans or estimates. As previously indicated, the City hopes to have a Cost Estimate in roughly 90-days with actual bids to follow. Until we have an Engineer’s Cost Estimate it is impossible to establish the total cost of the Project or to quantify the potential cost of frontage improvements based upon the entire project design and further on a parcel-by-parcel basis. Conservatively, we anticipate a minimum of $250,000 over time in total from all parcels subject to an Agreement. Based upon very preliminary estimates, the revenues would represent up to 15-percent of the anticipated project costs. The affected parcels represent approximately 25-percent of all parcels along the corridor; many of which previously constructed typical improvements, including curb, gutter and sidewalk (which will continue to be utilized).

Conclusion. Staff is requesting policy direction on Poplar Street due to the presence of a pending major Capital Project. The recommended action is based upon a two-step process: 1) confirm that staff can notify owners of the City’s intent to seek payment under Agreements; and 2) return to City Council later with the project cost estimates and proposed methodology for allocating the costs to the twenty parcels. Staff is further recommending that the City Council authorize staff to consider allocation of a portion of the grant funds to off-set some of the Agreement related costs in light of the regional-serving nature of Poplar Street and the presence of the OBAG grant funds. It is also recommended that staff evaluate options for making the payments, including installment payments. Staff provided mailed notice to each of the 21 affected property owners informing them of this meeting (see Attachment 4).

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Map Depicting Locations of Poplar Deferred Improvement Agreements

2. List of Property Owners and APNs of Poplar Deferred Improvement Agreements

3. Compilation of the 20 Poplar Deferred Street Improvement Agreements

4. Sample of Letter Sent to the 20 Affected Properties
133
134
Number Address Street APN Resolution
3 240 Poplar 064‐193‐230 C‐58‐00
4 308 Poplar 064‐202‐300 C‐105‐76
5 344 Poplar 064‐202‐370 C‐16‐90
2 347 Poplar 064‐201‐210 C‐21‐76
6 348 Poplar 064‐202‐380 C‐13‐90
7 352 Poplar 064‐202‐390 C‐05‐08
11 355 Poplar 064‐201‐220 C‐14‐90
9 360 Poplar 064‐212‐540 C‐30‐08
10 428 Poplar 064‐232‐360 C‐25‐02
1 454 Poplar 064‐232‐570 C‐19‐00
8 459 Poplar 064‐231‐290 C‐15‐90
12 460 Poplar 064‐232‐400 C‐12‐77
13 480 Poplar 064‐232‐430 C‐50‐07
14 535 Poplar 064‐241‐110 C‐106‐76
15 609 Poplar 064‐271‐380 C‐84‐11
17 611 Poplar 064‐271‐390 C‐85‐11
16 & 18 615 ‐ 617 Poplar 064‐271‐360, 370 C‐70‐10
19 651 Poplar 064‐271‐190 C‐58‐80
20 653 ‐ 655 Poplar 064‐271‐210 C‐14‐79
21 670 Poplar 064‐272‐140 C‐19‐02
135
240 POPLAR STREET
APN: 064-193-230
RESO NO. C-58-00 136
137

RECORDING REQUESTED BY,
Dorothy R. Robbins, City Clerk
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City Clerk
City of Half Moon Bay
501 Main Street
HalfMoon Bay, CA 94019
650) 726- 8270
February 5, 2001
DOC # 2002- 018745
02/ 14/ 2001 09: 20A AG Fee: NC

Recorded in Official Records
County of San Mateo
Warren
Assessor - County Clerk - Recorder Recorded By

II IIII IIIII IIIIIIII II IIIII III II II III IIIIIIII II I

STREET AGREEMENT

TITLE OF DOCUMENT ZY
A Street Agreement Between the City of Half Moon Bay and Robert and Lisa Garcia
138
240 POPLAR STREET
APN 064- 103- 230)
STREET

AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 27th day of July , 2000
by and between the City of Half Moon Bay, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called " CITY", and Robert Garcia and Lisa H. Garcia hereinafter called " PERMITTEE".

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, PERMITTEE is the owner of real property in the City of Half Moon Bay, County of San Mateo, State of California, located at 240 Poplar Street APN 064 - 103 - 230 ), and has requested a building permit from the CITY concerning the construction of a building upon the real property described in the building permit attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, PERMITTEE is required to provide certain necessary public improvements, hereinafter specified, in conformance with the requirements of CITY which will benefit and improve the real property described; and st* WHEREAS, in consideration of the granting of a building permit, PERMITTEE is tin required, at his own cost and expense, to provide minimum access to the property consistent with the requirements of Chapter 14. 12 of the Municipal Code. " r NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED TO BY THE PARTIES, as follows:

1. The real property subject to this Agreement is described in the building permit attached hereto as Exhibit " A". -

2. PERMITTEE agrees to provide access to the property pursuant to Chapter 14. 12 of the Municipal Code which, for the PERMITTEE' s property, shall be an: --

CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX) ( INITIALS)
pr' existing partially improved street
existing interim private street
l `
interim private street constructed by applicant

3. PERMITTEE agrees to cooperate with other property owners, the CITY and other public agencies to provide any or all of the public improvements set forth in Exhibit " B" of this Agreement under a joint cooperative plan including the formation of an assessment project under appropriate improvements procedures and/ or bond acts, if such a program is undertaken by the CITY to secure the installation and construction of Revised 3/ 27/ 96 F: STREET AGREEMENT Page 1
139
the improvements. PERMITTEE' s signature hereto shall be deemed to be his signature binding on his successor and assigns, if any) on a petition for formation of an assessment district which may be utilized by CITY under any appropriate improvement act provided by state law for the competition of any or all such improvements.

4. PERMITTEE agrees to dedicate necessary street right-of-way and easements commensurate with CITY requirements and shall deliver to CITY such rights- of-way and easements as may be required at the time of receiving notification from CITY to proceed with construction of the public improvements. Dedication shall be limited to a thirty-foot ( 30') half street and PERMITTEE agrees to appropriate set back requirements for future widening of street rights- of-way.

5. This Agreement shall be recorded by CITY. All covenants herein contained shall pertain to and run with the real property described herein, and the Agreement shall apply to, bind, and inure to the heirs, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto.

6. In the event of litigation over this Agreement or its performance, the prevailing party shall receive attorneys fees and costs.

7. This Agreement is subject to City Council approval. The PERMITTEE understands that if the City Council does not approve this Agreement, all work pursuant to the permit Issued in consideration of this Agreement may be stopped.

INI WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers on the date and year first above written.

CITY"
EST:

Dorothy M. RobbioW, City Clerk
j
r
PERMITTEE"
Rob3 Gc. r
Iv`n
Lisa H. Gla.rcia

CITY OF HALF MOON BAY
By.

Blair King, WManager
Note: " PERMITTEE" shall have his/ her signature( s) notarized, with the Notary Public' s certification clearly attached to this document.

Revised 3/ 27/ 96 F: STREET AGREEMENT Page 2
140

CALIFORNIA
ALL-PURPOSE elm

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF
On fLe. 25 (_ -)before me, C CAA F Ch _ n
DATE NAME, TITL OF OFFICER - E. G., " JANE DOE, NC
personally appeared, f LGck-'' c
personaffitgimowrrto me ( or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person( s) whose name( s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that hefsfil-e/ they executed the same in his/ her/ their authorized capacity( ies), and that by his./her/their signature( s) on the instrument the person( s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person( s) acted, executed the instrument.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
1 NOTMO PUBLIC SIGNATURE
NANCY F. CHRISTENSEN
Cc?;'nrr: ission it 1121857 L
Z °? t
j Notary Pub; ic -- California >
san' Mla; eo County
x My Comm. Expires , Ian 9, 2001
SEAL)
iIWkW

WWI OPTIONAL INFORMATION
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT - — fl

DATE OF DOCUMENT -
7Y ?---7 - 71 bb NUMBER OF PAGES

SIGNER( S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE -- I
4/ 2, T, , a
t i.. 11lt s II t
i r•
l
t
i` a ! U ads: '
141

CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
ss.

County of ScL,
On a o l before me, OL, Sc-} A) 6T-Al..y ? LX
Dae Name and Title of Officer ( e. g., ' Jane Doe. Notary Public') personally appeared IJ ( ,
Name( s) of Signer( s)
personally known to me
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence
to be the person( s) whose name( s) is/ are
subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/ she/they executed
the same in his/ her/ their authorized
capacity( ies), and that by his/ her/ their
signature( s) on the instrument the person( s), or
the entity upon behalf of which the person( s)
acted, executed the instrument.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
o
Place Notary Seal Above Signature ol Notary Public

OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.

Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document:

Document Date:

Signer( s) Other Than Named Above:

Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer
Signer' s Name:

Individual
Corporate Officer — Title( s):

Partner — Limited General
Attorney in Fact
Trustee
Guardian or Conservator
Other:

Signer Is Representing:

Number of Pages:

RIGHT THUMBPRINT
OF
Top SIGNERb hurn here
m 1997 National Notary Association • 9350 De Soto Ave.. P.O. Box 2402 • Chatsworth. CA 91313- 2402 Prod. No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll - Free 1. 600- 876- 6827 1Z0 2 0 - 7. Z.", —4t
31 1i 19 ( 1( i i ! ii fi 10 iE id{ IIEi 1 0 417001 i)4'. f r1C = sge 5 of
142
v
w
w
LL
C)
1 oo c
L)
Q
0 E
d
m
J
IL
r- 4 O U y " 00 7
U
C O U) • UO y
LLI
LC Y
O Q U V) - d O
tY
cz
R. U
D 3 a)
3 3 > 0
cl) C
y
0 a)_ T
rp LL.
0)
a
QCO U . O cm coU C
r-+.

O n c a) cac cO
Z
U
U v O U .»
J0 0 m O Q
3C, E
y
C ca a) LL
L C O E Eii N
Q
m
N
Y
La
a
U
T
A CC O a) 0) C
Ca C C ( 0
cn
0, 0
C?- p co Q U
u)
U)
cn
L Mn U O O C N Q- CL r -
y
N
U
LL w v
ULa
w cz w w m w m Z, a v
0 E00 0
Q o to
O¢
w U[
w
m zZ
Z
w
Z
I FZ
W
F- F- w 0 O c)- n
o
en a E en
O cO ED o
J H
O
94 1-z i
N2
LLJ
to
in U. zz,
0 N Q J U
W
U Q J
w
J F— cz F— U CLF— . T O ca
CL z
i
uj
v)
LLI
0 L
U
U.{ m.--
LU
fA F4 C
Y+... y2
1 n ick
a
yd
O
Z
14 P4 tO f x
w'
C
Y t w
F U
Fr
H
P, 43
1 r
a
ntCt m zsi
m
i 4
O
O 0( DZ
u')
S9
s
O Z Q o
tD
IT
O
Z
J
w
FU
W
w
LL
4 U
U
U- JLU1
o
1 oo c
m' i>s
0 E
d
m
4o
r- 4 O U y " 00 7
U
C O U) • UO LC y Y
O Q U V) - d O
tY
cz
R. U
D 3 a)
3 3 > 0
cl) C
y
0 a)_ T
Q 0) co - 0 U
a
QCO U . O cm coU C
V1 — N U T cz
O n c a) cac cO
Z
U
U v O U .»
J0 0 m O Q
3C, E
Q._ C
W
C ca a) LL
L C O E Eii N
0 "O x. CD 0
T-O--
m
N
Y
m 0 Co U- 0 16 F
a
U
T
A CC O a) 0) C
Ca C C ( 0
cn
0, 0
C?- p co Q U
u)
U)
cn
L Mn U O O C N Q- CL r -
y
a m
U
LL w v
o 0 — O
o d x OC tY C- c 0 . 0
i ` L
m y
ii N m w Y E
Page
a m a co cn a u) cn a E E ' U LL w v w cz w w m w m Z, a v 0 E000
Q o to
O¢
w U[
w
m zZ
Z
w
Z
I FZ
F- F- w 0 O c)- n
o
en a E en
O cO ED o O w
O ea
c
Q
B : w a
LLJ
W 0 N Q J U Q J U Q J U J F— cz F— U CLF— . T O ca
I a ` 7
20r
z
FLLI
N P.
a w
LLJ
Z LLw
J UZ
Q
Z
O m
Z;- } O
J
Q
Q
J LU
Q d
CO m
c0
mCL
acO
O
CL
E co
a) C
O O
C
N
CUL _
Q
a 3
a) O
C J
o
y
a) Q
CL E
O
U
U 0
Y
QJ
Y 0
O U
3 m
m
OU
O O
U E
C U co
E m 0 O
0 s O
d
cC
U)
C
E_
E U)>, a)
O O CL y Q ' U M
i Q U O w
a) m o
cs >
CA

U) U -- C
U
w M LO N w m r t`,. O co
E N M LO N M m
x>
LLC
Q)
a) U o U c o
U
O
0) L
c cC c? 5 ca a
O a) a)
3 " O a E a 2 " 0
L . 0
mCL uj ..- C). o0000` ccoo
t rC tt? t33
C
0 r- 4 '."` 4
qn W
m
M
o'
Page
Y+... y2
a O
Z Z
fu
Hs
r4 w' Y t w
F U
F- H
ntCt m zsi i 4
31 s.e, r4 v, U)
R
N
VLUesa. n

4.)
Irr:) CT U
ZO zZ C co
w U) U)
w
w
U)
w.
w
W w
w
m w
m U) m 2} 2 m}
Z cn Q U) 1 Z Q U Z U f~!)
Q
U
w NOlidId0S3( 1 E13NMO 103ilHOHV
Q
CL
d
lVJ3l
Q
I a ` 7
20r
z
FLLI
N P.
a w
LLJ
Z LLw
J UZ
Q
Z
O m
Z;- } O
J
Q
Q
J LU
Q d
CO m
c0
mCL
cOa
O
CL
E co
a) C
O O
C
N
L _ CU
Q
a 3
a) O
C J
o
y
a) Q
CL E
O
U
U 0
Y
QJ
Y 0
O U
3 m
m
OU
O O
U E
C U co
E m 0 O
0 s O
d
Cc
U)
C
E_
E U)>, a)
O O CL y Q ' U M
i Q U O w
a) m o
cs >
CA

U) U -- C
U
w M LO N w m r t`,. O co
E N M LO N M m
x>
Q)
LLC
a) U o U c o
U
O
0) L
c cC c? 5 ca a
O a) a)
3 " O a E a 2 " 0
L . 0
mCL uj ..- C). o0000` ccoo
t rrC
qn
4 '."`
tt? t33
0 W
4 M
m
143
EXHIBIT " B"

STREET IMPROVEMENTS -

1. Clearing and grubbing

2. Grading

3. Earthwork

4. Subbase

5. Base

6. Paving

7. Curb and gutter

8. Sidewalk

9. Handicap curb ramps

10. Storm drain

11. Sanitary sewer

12. Manholes

13. Catch basins

14. Culverts

15. Underground electric power

16. Underground communications ( telephone, cable N)

17. Underground gas

18. Water main and service

19. Street signs

20. Survey monuments

21. Relocation of existing utilities

22. Erosion control

23. Engineering

24. Construction inspection

25. Contingencies
ii ' . ji , i ti i+ I 3 + + i . •'. 14 ' R"T as T a
14+ 20
Revised 3/ 27/ 96 F: STREET AGREEMENT Page 3
144
308 POPLAR STREET
APN: 064-202-300
RESO NO. C-105-76 145
RESOLUTION No. pz
t
RESOLUTION APPROVING AGrnrr FOR INSTALLATION

OF IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE SAME ( William C. Cory, 308 Poplar St.)
The City Council of the City of Half Moon Bay does resolve that the agreement between William C. Cory and the City of Half Moon Bay dated May 14, 1976, a copy of which is affixed hereto and by reference is made a part hereof, is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute the same on behalf of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Half Moon Bay, California, on n, , 1976 at a regular meeting thereof, by the following vote:

AYES, and in favor thereof:

NOES: Lc Ga
ABSENT: C' < cEL, sGFi
C eMayor~
ATIEST. ,
Dep ty City .Clerk'
I hereby approve the foregoing resolution this & day of 1976.

I / Ide- Mayor
I, the Deputy City Clerk of the City of Half Moon Bay, hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Half Moon Bay by the above vote at a meeting,'thie eof duly held and called on the above date.

AK " Ux7 "' 118 PA^ L 14 « k

RECORDED T REQUEST OF
R Deputy City Clerk
JUL Ll 1 47 PM 1976
P r'

MARVIN CHURCH, RECORDER

SAN MATEO COUNTY

OFFICIAL RECORDS
Indexed
VOL l ± 8 P4GE 114
146
L
AGREEMENT.

THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this
day of / 4/ -/7 197_6_, by and between the CITY
OF HALF MOON BAY, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called CITY ", and
hereinafter called " PERMITYEE"
WITNESSETH:

N
WHEREAS, Permittee is the owner of real property
in the City of Half Moon Bay, County of San Mateo, State of California,, and has requested a building permit from the City concerning the construction of a building upon the real property described in Exhibit " A" attached hereto; and WHEREAS, Permittee is required to provide certain
necessary public improvements, hereinafter specified, in conformance with the requirements of City which will benefit and improve the real property described in said Exhibit " A"; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the granting of a
building permit, and for and in consideration of the approval by City of the proposed public improvements adjacent to the Permittee' s said property, Permittee is willing, at his own cost and expense, to furnish all materials and construct and w install -the said public improvements; and
WHEREAS, the regulations of City provide for deferment of the construction of such public improvements and Permittee desires to enter into this agreement with City for the construction and installation of said public improvements at 147
E
the time specified in this agreement and City is willing to issue necessary and requested permits to Permittee
for the development of said real property described in Exhibit " A" attached hereto subject to the public improvements being constructed in accordance with this agreement:

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED TO'. BY THE
PARTIES, as follows:

1. The real property subject to this agreement
is described in Exhibit " A" attached hereto.
r

2. Permittee agrees to install and construct in
accordance with the terms of this agreement the improvements described in Exhibit " B" attached hereto.

All of said improvements and materials used therein
shall be in accordance with the ordinances, regulations, standards and specifications of City and all of the work shall be constructed to the complete satisfaction of the City Engineer.

3. Permittee agrees to cooperate with other property
owners, the City and other public agencies to provide the public improvements set forth in Exhibit " B" of this agreement under a joint cooperative plan including the formation of an assessment project under appropriate .improvement procedures and / or bond acts, if such a program is undertaken by the City to secure the installation and construction of the improvements. Permittee' s signature hereto shall be deemed to be his signature ( binding on his successor and assigns, if any) on a petition for formation of an assessment district which may be utilized by City under any appropriate improvement act provided by state law for the completion of any or all such improvements.
2- '
WvDii1981046E116
148

4. The Permittee agrees to dedicate necessary
street right of way and easements commensurate with City requirements and shall deliver to City such rights of way and easements as may be required at the time of receiving notification from City to proceed with construction of the public improvements. Dedication shall be limited to a thirtyfoot ( 3C') half street and Permittee agrees to appropriate set back requirements for future widening of street rights of way.

5. City may notify Permittee at any time in
writing to commence the installation and construction of the public improvements. The notice shall be sufficient if mailed to Permittee at the address of the owner, of the property as shown on the latest adopted County assessment roll. The notice shall describe the work to be done by the Permittee, the time within which the work shall commence and the time within which it shall be completed.

6. Upon notification by City to proceed with the
work, the Permittee shall dedicate the necessary right of way and shall cause engineered improvement plans to be prepared by a registered civil engineer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and at the Permittee' s expense. After approval of said plans by the City, the Permittee shall make application to the City Engineer for any required encroachment permit to perform the aforementioned work in the right of way of City. The City Engineer shall, after Permittee or his contractor Mas complied with all of the requirements of City, for the issuance of such e permit, cause an ancroschment permit to be issued to the Permittee or his contractor to perform said work in the right of way of City. 3-
VOL 7198 NGE 11.7
149

7. Five ( 5) days prior to commencement of
work on the improvements herein provided for, the Permittee shall notify the City Engineer, in writing, of his intention to begin work on said improvements. The Permittee shall, at the option of the City Engineer, pay all costs of inspection incurred by said City, and if such is required by the City Engineer, the Permittee shall deposit an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost of such inspection prior to commencement of work.

B. Permittee agrees to install and complete the
work within the time specified in the notice given by City in accordance with the standards and specifications of the City.

9. Should the Permittee fail to complete any or
all of said improvements within the time allotted as specified in the notice to Permittee described in Paragraph 6. of this Agreement, City may construct, or cause to be constructed, said improvements, and the Permittee agrees to reimburse City for the cost of any and all labor and materials used therefor, including engineering, inspection, and all administrative overhead of City. In the event Permittee fails to pay all sums due City on account of such work within thirty ( 30) days after receipt of notice, the City is hereby authorized to cause the cost thereof to be assessed as a lien against the real property hereinabove described. Such lien may be foreclosed upon if necessary, provided, however, that the lien herein provided for shall be subordinate to the First Deed of Trust for the purchase_ of, and / or for the construction of improvements on, said real property of Permittee.
4-
woL 7108 PAGE 118
150

10. The Permittee shall notify the City Engineer,
in writing, of the completion of the improvement work herein provided for so that final inspection may be performed prior to acceptance of said improvement work by City.

11. At such time as the installation of improvements for which Permittee is herein made responsible has been completed and accepted by the City Engineer, City Engineer agrees t6 file any required notice of completion of said improver ments.

12. The Permittee shall protect and indemnify City
and the officers and employees thereof against all liability and claims because of, or arising out of, any accident, loss, or damage, happening or occurring during the performance of any and all work done by or for Permittee under the terms of this Agreement or cause by any condition resulting from such work.

13. Should legal action be necessary to enforce
any provisions of this agreement, Permittee agrees to pay all reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred by City in connection therewith.

14. This Agreement may be recorded by City. All
covenants herein contained shall pertain to and run with the real property described herein, and this Agreement shall apply to, bind and inure to the heirs, successors,; and assigns of the parties hereto.
5-
WOL 7198 PAaM
151
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have
caused this agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers on the day and year first above written.

CITY" CITY OF HALF MOON BAY
C
ity MarQcLpr
ATTEST:

IL
epu y City le>
PERMITTEE" Oif c / y
William C. Cory
State of
Calif.

Ss.

County of San Mai- an
@aaiellala8afi911aiiESia8119ai1111111sielilOillle el11e11 EAATrtITT R. 5AUNDERS
NOTARY PUt3LIC — CALIFORNIA 9 t w.F-/ PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN

B SAN MATEO COUNTY
My Commission Expires May 15, 1977
ieieellallellllalsafilaaa58iiaila faaOelieslaaealeleilll® On this the 14thday of May 19 76 , before me,
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
William C. Cory
known to me to be the person( s) whose name( sr) i G subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that he
executed the same for the purposes therein contained.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal. i
u0t 1 P,4GE w
152
r
a

GRANT DEED
By this instrument dated,_ March 25, 1976
THOMAS J. CALLAN
hereby GRANTS to
WILLIAM C. CORY, an unmarried man
Escrow No....._. 610336
for a szluable consideratiorn 11
the following described Real Property in the State of California, County of --------------- San, - Ma_ten ....... - city of .... Half Moon Bay--- ------ -- - -----
LOTS 22 and 23 in Block 24 as shown or, that certain map entitled AMENDED MAP OF ARLEiCA PARK, HALF MOON BAY", filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Mateo County on September 17, 1906 in Book E of Maps at page 37 and a copy thereof entered in Book 4 of Maps at page 30.

A. P. No. 064- 202 - 010
THOMAS ' T.- -- CALLAN--- --- ---- ----- ---- ---- --- - -- -- STATE OF CALIFORNIA On .......... Mar .. .... 31 ............... ] 9.... 7.6 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and f(, r said San Mateo SS County and State, personally appeared....... rhomaS J. Callan COUNTYOr ... ........ ....... ........ ....... ......................._. ......... .......... ...... known to me o> be the
person........ whose name............ i's . ....................... subscribed to the with /ien y
ps' gm+ent, and acl. nowlec c that... , _. t xe, used the same.

Notary' s Signal — °'('• f.

Mt• drr! ttCrt: rOl . reu rrrrruaemsuftltuuuntuml
ra ! EMMITT R. SAUNDcRS
NOTARY 1' 1. 61. IC-- CALIFORMA
s,••.,, I!. I, c:I1 ±l. CiFFICI. IN
SAN f.71fh.0 G1UN1Y
y5 MAIL TAX STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED ABOVE nfy C. arm is: om C> paea may I5, 1977 Ivot PAGE
153
F

IMPROVEMENTS
Street grading and paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalks,
storm drainage improvements, lighting, trees and landscaping, and miscellaneous appurtenances.

I
I

EXHIBIT B
TOL71 ,98 PAGE 122
154
344 POPLAR STREET
APN: 064-202-370
RESO NO. C-16-90 155
RESOLUTION NO. 16 - 90

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF HALF MOON BAY AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A

STREET ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT WITH
T. M. F. DEVELOPMENT, INC.
344 POPLAR ( APN 064 - 202 - 370)
WHEREAS, T. M. F. Development, Inc. has applied for and received a building permit; and
WHEREAS, the City Council requires execution of an
agreement to participate in an assessment district for
certain improvements; and
WHEREAS, such agreement has been submitted to the City
Council and approved by the City Council:

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City
Council of the City of Half Moon Bay that that particular Agreement dated August 11, 1989, and signed by Warren D.

Lewis, President for T. M. F. Development, Inc. is approved and the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute said Agreement ( Exhibit A hereto) on behalf of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Half Moon Bay at a regular meeting thereof held April 17, 1990, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers: Bedesem, Eriksen, Patridge, Patterson NOES, Councilmembers: None
ABSTAIN, Councilmembers: Iverson
ABSENT, Councilmembers: None
R, Ri,a
Helen Bedesem, Mayor
rv1&02M1M
Donna Riso, City Clerk
156
WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO:

CITY CL -- K

CITY OF HALF MOON BAY
P. O. BOX 67
HALF MOC1N BAY, CA 94019

CITY OF
RF 9COGS325
CO
r T OF
9EB
LN
MF.

AF ' 90 ( SAY 14 PH 2 13
T '. : : DER
RESOLUTION NO. 1690 SANi

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

HALF MOON BAY AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A

STREET ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT WITH
T. M. F. DEVELOPMENT, INC.
344 POPLAR ( APN 064 - 202 - 370)
WHEREAS, T. M. F. Development, Inc. has applied for and received a building permit; and
WHEREAS, the City Council requires execution of an 0
agreement to participate in an assessment district for 0 certain improvements; and 0
WHEREAS, such agreement has been submitted to the City :

J7
Council and approved by the City Council:

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City
Council of the City of Half Moon Bay that that particular Agreement dated August 11, 1989, and signed by Warren D.

Lewis, President for T. M. E. Development, Inc. is approved and the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute said Agreement ( Exhibit A hereto) on behalf of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Half Moon Bay at a regular meeting thereof held April 17, 1990, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers: Bedesem, Eriksen, Patridge, Patterson NOES, Councilmembers: None
ABSTAIN, Councilmembers: Iverson
ABSENT, Councilmembers:

ATTEST:,
Donna Rdso`, City Clerk
None
4y' R
Helen Bedesem, Mayor
i hereby Cefft that the foregoing
a true and Coned copy of the u
dooMOM On file In the of"("
C4tyGierkof the City of Half `,;:

City, Clerk:
157
S T R F E _
A G R F. E M ti T
THIS AGREEMENT. made and entered
day of A_ugust_.__..- , is - gg..._., by
Half Moon Bay. a municipal cornoration
CITY", and T. M. F. Development,__ Inc,.___
hereinafter called " PERMITTEE"
WITNESSETH:
344 POPLAR
APN 064- 202 - 370)
into this 11
and between the Citv_ of
hereinafter called
WHEREAS, Permittee is the owner of real pronerty in the Citv of Half Moon Bay, County of San Mateo, State of California, and has requested a building permit from the City concerning the construction of a building upon the real property described in the building permit attached hereto, and
WHEREAS. Permittee is required to provide certain necessary public improvements, hereinafter specified, in conformance with the requirements of City which will benefit and improve the real property described; and
WHEREAS, in consideration of the granting of a building permit, Permittee is required, at his own cost and expense. to provide minimum access to the Property consistent with the requirements of Chapter 14. 12 of the Municipal Code, and place in a Street Improvement Fund a deposit equal to the amount of the estimated improvement adjacent to the described property, estimate attached. and:

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED TO BY THE PARTIES, as follows:

1. The real pronerty subject to this Agreement is
described in the building permit attached hereto as Exhibit " A"

2. Permittee agrees to provide access to the property
pursuant to Chapter 14. 12 of the Municipal Code which; for the nermittee' s property shall be an:
existing partially improved street
existing interim private street
interim private street
constructed by the applicant

3. Permittee agrees to pay to the City the sum shown in Exhibit " B" attached hereto for the street improvements set forth therein.

4. Permittee agrees to cooperate with other property
owners, the City and other public agencies to provide the public improvements set forth in Exhibit " B" of this agreement under a 1-
CO
O
UI
Cs
158
io-i;: t, cooperative n. i including the formation j an assessment proiect' under appropriate improvements procedu.rt_.., and / or bond acts, if such a program is undertaken by the City to secure the installation and construction of the improvements. Permi,ttees signature hereto sha.li be deemed to be his signature ( binding on his successor and assigns, if anv) on a petition for formation of an assessment district which may be utilized by City under anv appropriate improvement act provided by state law for the completion of any or all such improvements.

5. The Permittee agrees to dedicate necessary street
right -of -way and easements commensurate with City requirements and shall deliver to Citv such rights -of -wav and easements as may he required at the time of receiving notification from City to proceed with construction of the public improvements. Dedication shall be limited to a thirty -foot ( 30') half street and Permittee agrees to appropriate set back requirements for future widening of street rights -of -way.

6. This Agreement shall be recorded by City. All
covenants herein contained shall pertain to and run with the real property described herein, and this Agreement shall apply to, bind and inure to the heirs, successors, and assigns of the narties hereto.

7. In the event an assessment district is formed, permittee' s deposit will be credited towards his share of the improvements thereof.

8. In the event of litigation over this Agreement or its performance, the prevailing party shall receive attorneys fees and costs.

9. This Agreement is subject to Council approval. The
Permittee understands that if the City Council does not approve this agreement, all work pursuant to the permit issued in consideration of this agreement may be stopped.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers on the day and vear first above written.

CITY" CITY OF HALF MOON BAY
BY
Citv Manaaer
ATTEST
r
T. M. F. DEVELOPMERr, INC.

City (7lerk
x
1 "
PERMITTEE" '--
2-
CD
O
U1
CJ
CT
159
c
0 a
O y0
bmaZ
o OZx
zN
E
0K
z
w
O
b
a
O
a
k
m
G
m
m
m
O
a
x
5'
w
n
E
GZC99006
w•
O
C
a:
o
a
ro
z
F
n y
Oy
CI Z
O
On
T D
o
r
D
nn
160
o. 2
2 n
4 n
N2
n2
n
z
O
i1
g 0 0 0 0 0 0
sa as a- a_
r. 20 o• . 0• 0 Q•
p2 m m m m m
i •
3 B O to V W N
ro W I V U OWD
c a
m N a H'• O O v 3 rt
W
n
m g
H.
m 4
1 is
O O 9 IF _
3 a m
mw m
4$ 9
nZ
0 m
NJu,
O
n
Ov3 m d
N
Q0
N
V0
0 w
rN
WID
0 ko
0a
mA p°' 0 ° TmoTV °T
p °
n• H O_ cr
g• a O33 ° 3 n. o_
13 S - p O F w 5 S + N =•
C 3 O a H n U° 3 "p
s O ° `" O QN
J
3 O O N W N Q (3p O j 3• A p 3 N C . 2
C S N C 3 V 3 q S
CL CL
3 Sao =a m3O
U, O- A m N A N 3 Mm p i m p
O S m
N y
N fl ( C 3 00
3WEr3'
3 Q
o'
m
3 p 0 C, 3 j

5. j
3 m Wm

3. 0
0 C n
O
0 m 0,
DAp7?
VV
a a R P@
sa 2
D Q. 5 n
a. o
3 n ^ 3
o
o
0 aro 8
o .
0 it F N
O N
JOT
yOy
9 7 p C
1? ` G T .- R K 1
m
EerZ
3 v E
D D 2
O < Z O
O Q m Z T
Z C °
n v a M Z
m C
N m3a m
ZyV.- D A3
mAm
Y O2
a
O00
OO
o O MM yz
A
Qz

L ' -' T OWNER
LEGAL

DESCRIPTION
Dv
n
b W
y n D Z n D Z r
m Z
D v D v D O c N
m
v m r
N
n N
Z
O
i.3
r
M
O
Q
0 v O
A
y
m , Dy
v 3
Nm m
y
wm coW
OIr
Rm
w r
M1 O
rw
N0% 10
1 v p
y
N A
Qz
N
Ay
C•:
0 ti m N m
m m
OZ
D
n
ZQ f+
b W
N mm H lP
C m
O
w
a O
Dv
O w m ro o r
n
r5
O my a m OA K
A Am
x
3 Nm 1"
ct
H
r
Q u < Q
o
n T O r aDm 3
Z O Z aO
V O
Dn
I m w
m
o
tn
A C
a
a
ba
nH
v
mH
0 fi
I
4 G
Krwi
rN
10 0
tD
0 W
O
Dv m N
y
n O ym a m Om m Z A Am
o 3 Nm 1"
n
H C Q u < Q n T O r aDm 3
Z O Z aO
V O
Dn
I m w
O
Z
tn
A C
a
ba
W
a A
Z
m
o
t+ Z
R N Y
w N
m w
n
m
m
3 r
v
0 co
161
Project Location:

FRONTAGE ON
EXHIBIT " B" -
344 Poplar St.

APN O64 - 2.02 - 370
Poplar St. 57. 0 lineal feet
O
a
w
Charges based on $ 75. 00 per lineal
foot for sidewalk, curb and gutter,
storm drain across project frontage
to City standard, and undergrounding
of all utilities ( gas, electric,
sewer, telephone and cable TV).

75. 00 x 57. 0. lineal feet = $ 4, 275. 00
TOTAL DUE: $ 4, 275. 00
162
347 POPLAR STREET
APN: 064-201-210
RESO NO. C-21-76 163
34/ 7 ` P6?aLn Aj Alul
RESOLUTION No. L14r

RESOLUTION APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION

OF IMPROVEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE SAME ( Evelyn Egger)
The City Council of the City of Half Moon Bay does resolve that the agreement between Evelyn Egger and the City of Half Moan Bay dated February 6, 1976, a copy of which is affixed hereto and by reference is made a part hereof, is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute the same on behalf of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Half Moon Bay, California, on 4 ; r. e,6 k! 1976 at a regular meeting thereof, by the following vote:

AYES, and in favor thereof lCfd, lGt / tom z elfl + ?wfGtti- lLa1t(i NOES: jjC ?LC?
ABSENT: CII Et. lJ
y
Mdqor
r
Attyest, ,
8Puty City C1 erk
r
I hereby apkove the foregoing resolution this ' day of
1976.

V ./ '
I, the Deputy City Clerk of the City of Half Moon Bay, hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly 'addpted by the City Council of the City of Half Moon Bay by the abovb° ote ~ at a meeting thereof duly held and called on the above date.

Indexed
A
eput erk'—
C 7
h'-
CIA
C=)
164
AGREEMENT.

RECORDED A]' REQUES' IOF
Hl AR 11 12 03 PH M
MARYIN CH!UP106! . Rlt'U+PUR
SAN MATEO L: UIN'TY
OFFIMA. r,TUFUS
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this
day of 197, by and between the CITY
OF HALF MOON BAY, a unicipal c; porstion, hereinafter called CITY ", and
hereinafter called " PERMITTEE ".
lar
WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, Permittee is the owner of real property
in the City of Half Moon Bay, County of San Mateo, State of California, and has requested a building permit from the City concerning the construction of a building upon the real property described in Exhibit " A" attached hereto; and WHEREAS, Permittee is required to provide certain
necessary public improvements, hereinafter specified, in conformance with the requirements of City which will benefit and improve the real property described in said Exhibit " A "; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the granting of a
building permit, and for and in consideration of the approval by City of the proposed public improvements adjacent to the Permittee' s said property, Permittee is willing, at his own cost and expense, to furnish all materials and construct and install the said public improvements; and
WHEREAS, the regulations of City provide for deferment, of the construction of such public improvements and Permittee desires to enter into this agreement with City For the construction and installation of said public improvements at 1-
VOL 768 PACE 651
cp
d
P'
rY'
165
f
the time specified in this agreement and City is willing to issue necessary and rt,que; tec; permits to Permittee for the development of said real property de,, cr! bed in Exhibit " A" attached hereto si.!Jject to the puhlic improvements being constructed in nccnrdance with this ac; rnement:

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREOY AGREED TO PY THE
PARTIES, as follows:

1. The real property subject to this agreement
is described in Exhibit " A" attached hereto.

2. Permittee agrees to install and construct in
accordance with the terms of this agreement the improvements described in Exhibit " B" attached hereto.

All of said improvements and matelJ, Is usc:c therein:
shall be in accordance with the ordinances, regulations, standards and specifications of City an.c ail of the honk shall be constructed to the complete sati : fa; *.icn of 6 City Engineer.
a
Vic'^
I arm Ltee ngree.5 to uoopi I.; i Lltnf7;' 4- ,'[! E. ef i -t y E=
m c
owners, the City and other public, aycnciepublic improvements set forth in Exhibit " P!' of this agrrz -_ ment under ,, joint cooperative plan includinq the frmat :o of an assessment project under appropriate improvement procedures and / or bond acts, if such a pro,; ram is undertaken by the City to secure the installation and _-;onstruction of the improvements. Permittee' s signature hereto shall be deemed to be his signature ( binding on his successor and assigns, if any) on a petition for formation of an assessment district which may be utilized by City under any appropriate im.- rLvc - ment act provided by state low for the completion of E_; ny all such improvements. The n, ircnl or p'arceL, of land hernby committed to participation in such assessment district are described on Exhibit " C ".
2-
VUH7068 PACE652
166

4. The Permittee agrees to dedicate necessary
street right of way and easements commensurate with City requirements and shall deliver to City such rights of way and easements as may be required at the time of receiving notification from City to proceed with construction of the public improvements. Dedication shall be limited to a thifvfoot ( 301) half street and Permittee agrees to appropriate set back requirements for future widening of street rights of way.

5. City may notify Permittee at ary time in
writing to commence the: installation and construction of the public: improvements. The notice shall he sufficient if mailed to Permittee at the address of the owner of the property as shown on the latest adopted County assessment roll. Tie notice shall describe the work to be done by the - 'cr ^it.te:^, the time within which the work shall commence and the lima within which it shall be completed.

G. Upon notification by City to proceed w' th the
work, the Permittee shall dedicate the necess_ry right o` way and shall cause engineered improvement play-,a to be nrspared by a registered civil engineer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and at the PPrmlttee' a expense. Rftur approval of said plans by the City, the Prarmit.tne Fhfill make application to the City Engineer for - y req:, ir =.; d encroachment permit to perform the aforementioned work in the right of way of City. The City Engineer shall, after Permittee or his contractor has complied with all of thre requirements of City for the issuance of such a permit, C31150 no encroachment permit to be isscied to the Permittee or his contractor to perform said work in the right of way of City. 3-
VOL 703 F;unl653
167

7. Five ( 5) days prior to commencement of
work on the improvements herein provided for, the Permittee shall notify the City Engineer, in writing, of his intention to begin work an said improvements. The Permittee shall, at the option of the City Engineer, pay all cost;: of inspection incurred by said City, and if such is required by the City Engineer, the Permittee shall deposit an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost of such inspection prior to commencement of work.

8. Permittee agrees to install and complete the
work within the time specified in the notice given by City in accordance with the standards and specifications of the City.

9. Should the Permittee fail to complete any or
all of said improvements within the time allotted as specified in the notice to Permittee descrihed in Paragraph 6. of this Agreement, City may can :;tract, or cause, to br cr.nstrrjcted, paid improvements, and the Permittee agrens to reimburse City for the cost of any and all labor and materials used therefor, including engineering, inspection, and all administrative overhead of City. In the event Permittee fails to pay 911 sums due City on account of such work within thirty ( an) days after receipt of notice, the City i;; hrzri! hy authorirrvd to r.nuse the cost thereof to be assessed as a lie :r, ,. gainst thL, real property hereinabove described. Such lien may be foreclosed upon if necessary, provided, however, that the lien herein provided for shall be subordinate to the First Deed of Trust for the purchase of, and / or for the construction of improvements on, said real property of Permittee.
4-
va 7008 FdcE 654
I
168

10. The Permittee shall notify the City Engineer,
in writing, of the completion of the improvement work herein provided for so that final inspection may be performed prior to acceptance of said improvement work by City.

11. At such time as the installation of improvements for which Permittee is herein made responsible has been completed and accepted by the City Engineer, City Engineer agrees to file any required notice of completion of said improv--- ments.

12. The Permittee shall prot -ct and ir.dt..mni`' y City and the officers and employees thereof anainst all liability and claims because of, or arising out of, any accident, loss, or damage, happening or occurring during the performance of any and all work done by or for Permittee und+,r the t.n; m:: Or this Agreement or cause by any condition rrin,ji +,inq from work.

13. Should legal action be necessary to anfarce
any provisions of this agreement, Permittee agrees to pay all reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred by City in connection therewith.

14. This Agreement may he recorded by City. All
covenants herein contained shall pertain to and run with the real property described herein, and this Agreement shall, apply to, bind and inure to the heirs, successors, and assirp s of the parties hereto.
5-
VU 70038 ! UO3U FACE 655
L
169
It
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have
caused this agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers on the day and year first above written.

CITY" CITY OF HALF MOON BAY
1 City anager
f/
PERMITTEE" i
f
State of California
SS.

County of San Francisco
i vtm OFFICIAL SEAL
a MARY L. CHANG
NOTARY PUBLIC CALIFORNIA µe; PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN
OP" SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
My Commission Expires June 27, 1977
On this the 9th day of February 19 76 , before me,
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
known to me to be the person( s) whose name( s) is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that she
executed the same for the purposes therein contained.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal. 67 or
ycL " 7058 MUM
ATTEST: `
i
P
vilyGit'y Cle k
f y
yc T 4 x
f/
PERMITTEE" i
f
State of California
SS.

County of San Francisco
i vtm OFFICIAL SEAL
a MARY L. CHANG
NOTARY PUBLIC CALIFORNIA µe; PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN
OP" SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
My Commission Expires June 27, 1977
On this the 9th day of February 19 76 , before me,
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
known to me to be the person( s) whose name( s) is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that she
executed the same for the purposes therein contained.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal. 67 or
ycL " 7058 MUM
170
FORM NO. 804 REVISED ` - 73
FOR USE WITH AMERICAN LANL ; LE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY 1970 WITH STREET IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT COVERAGE. CALIFORNIA REGION FOR USE WITH CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY FORM - 1973 SCHEDULE A— Continued
The land referred to in this policy is situated in the State of California, County of San Mateo, City of Half Moon Bay , and is described as follows:

LOTS 22 and 23 in Block 16 as shown on that certain map entitled SECOND ADDITION TO ARLETA PARK, HALF MOON BAY ", filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Mateo County on October 8, 1906 in Book " C" of Original Maps at page 24 and copied into Book 4 of Maps at page 36.

A. P. NO. 64- 201 - 060

WITH OTHER PROPERTY)
EXHIBIT " A"
vaE 7068 FACE 657
171
M

IMPROUEMENIS
Street grading and paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalks,
storm drainage improvements, lighting, trees and landscaping, and miscellaneous appurtenances.

EXHIBIT B
wa 70508 'PACE658
172
348 POPLAR STREET
APN: 064-202-380
RESO NO. C-13-90 173
RESOLUTION NO. 13 - 90

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF HALF MOON BAY AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A

STREET ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT WITH
WESLAN DEVELOPMENT, INC.
348 POPLAR ( APN 064 - 202 - 380)
WHEREAS, Weslan Development, Inc. have applied for and
received a building permit; and
WHEREAS, the City Council requires execution of an
agreement to participate in an assessment district for
certain improvements; and
WHEREAS, such agreement has been submitted to the City
Council and approved by the City Council:

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City
Council of the City of Half Moon Bay that that particular Agreement dated August 11, 1989, and signed by Warren D.

Lewis, Secretary/ Treasurer for Weslan Development, Inc. is approved and the City Manager is hereby authorized to
execute said Agreement ( Exhibit A hereto) on behalf of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Half Moon Bay at a regular meeting thereof held April 17, 1990, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers: Bedesem, Eriksen, Patridge, Patterson NOES, Councilmembers: None
ABSTAIN, Councilmembers: Iverson
ABSENT, Councilmembers: None
4411-. R. per,
Helen Bedesem, Mayor
ATTEST:

Donna Riso, City Clerk
174
Wfog : RECC)RDED, RETURN TO: 0'
CITY CLERKd.

CITY OF HALF MOON BAY
P. 0. ECR 67
A, - HALF MOON BAY, CA 94019
1 yr OP
q v
n= 30 l7BY 1 `f PIS 2 13 1 "T
RESOLUTION N0. 13 - 90 OAP
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF fHE _;`,

CITY OF HALF MOON BAY AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A

STREET ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT WITH
WESLAN DEVELOPMENT, INC.
348 POPLAR ( APN 064 - 202 - 380)
WHEREAS, Weslan Development, Inc. have applied for and
received a building permit; and
WHEREAS, the City Council requires execution of an
agreement to participate in an assessment district for
certain improvements; and
WHEREAS, such agreement has been submitted to the City
Council and approved by the City Council:

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City
Council of the City of Half Moon Bay that that particular Agreement dated August 11, 1989, and signed by Warren D.

Lewis, Secretary /Treasurer for Weslan Development, Inc. is approved and the City Manager is hereby authorized to
execute said Agreement ( Exhibit A hereto) on behalf of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Half Moon Bay at a regular meeting thereof held April 17, 1990, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers: Bedesem, Eriksen, Patridge, Patterson NOES, Councilmembers: None
ABSTAIN, Councilmembers: Iverson
ABSENT, Councilmembers
ATTEST:

Donna Riso, City Clerk
None
Helen Bedesem, Mayor
1 hereby car* that the foregoing to
a true and oorrecfoopyof the ortginai
doCUtl,ei t an file in the office of the
atyaerkaf ocityofHaNMoonBay.

Date:

City aedG
t!t
W
tJ
IJ
175
348 POPLAR
APN 064 - 202 - 380)

S T R E E T
A G R E F. M E N T
THIS AGREEMENT. made and entered into this 11
day of August by and between the Citv of
Half Moon Bay. a municipal corporation. hereinafter called CITY ", and
hereinafter called " PERMITTEE ".

WITNESSF.TH:

WHEREAS, Permittee is the owner of real property in the City of Half Moon Bay. County of San Mateo, State of California.. and has requested a building permit from the City concerning the construction of a building upon the real property described in the building permit attached hereto, and
WHEREAS,. Permittee is required to provide certain necessary public improvements, hereinafter specified, in conformance with the requirements of City which will benefit and improve the real property described; and
WHEREAS, in consideration of the granting of a building permit, Permittee is required; at his own cost and expense, to provide minimum access to the property consistent with the requirements of Chapter 14. 12 of the Municipal Code. and place in a Street Improvement Fund a deposit equal to the amount of the estimated improvement adjacent to the described property, estimate attached. and;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED TO BY THE PARTIES,. as follows:

1. The real pronerty subject to this Agreement is
described in the building permit attached hereto as Exhibit " A"

2. Permittee agrees to provide access to the property
pursuant to Chapter 14. 12 of the Municipal Code which, for the permittee' s nronerty shall be an:

J existing partially improved street
existing interim private street
f
interim private street
constructed by the applicant

3. Permittee agrees to pay to the City the sum shown in Exhibit " B" attached hereto for the street improvements set forth therein.

4. Permittee agrees to cooperate with other property
owners, the City and other public agencies to provide the public improvements set forth in Exhibit " B" of this agreement under a 1-
CD
Cli
W
AJ
176
x
V' NO
NN
a z
i
U0
LL0 f.

WZ N O
ON
s: bUA
90065322aU
roOUm0O
d5
P OqO Wy 0
zO
W3m
Y0O
za
o 0
OvO
DV
177
i,;i: it- cooperative an including the formati.ci ' f an assessment project under appropriate improvements procedures and / or bond acts; if such a program is undertaken by the City to secure the installation and construction of the improvements. Permi.ttees sirnature hereto shall. be. deemed to he his signature fbindinq on his successor and assigns, if anv) on a petition for formation of an assessment district which may be utilized. by City under any appropriate improvement act provided by state law for the completion of any or all such improvements.

5. The Permittee agrees to dedicate necessary street
ri.aht -of -wav and easements commensurate with Citv requirements and shall deliver to Citv such rights -of -wav and easements as may be required at the time of receiving notification from City to proceed with construction of the public improvements. Dedication shall be limited to a thirty -foot ( 30') half street and Permittee agrees to appropriate set back requirements for future widening of street rights -of -way.

6. This Agreement shall be recorded by City. All
covenants herein contained shall pertain to and run with the real property described herein, and this Agreement shall apply to, bind and inure to the heirs, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto.

7. In the event an assessment district is formed, permittee' s deposit will be credited towards his share of the improvements thereof.

8. In the event of litigation over this Agreement or its performance; the prevailing party shall receive attorneys fees and costs.

9. This Agreement is subiect to Council approval. The
Permittee understands that if the City Council does not approve this agreement, all work pursuant to the permit issued in consideration of this agreement may be stopped.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers on the day and vear first above written.

Q
W
tV
CITY" CITY OF HALF MOON BAY
By ro
City Manager
ATTES
WESLAN DEVELOPMENT, INC.

City Cberk
PERMITTER" _ _
Warren D. Lewi
E1.E5. C_ yal yOEdc 0p/1LE.U% i.UC .
2- 178
LMOo
qq0
a
W` 0
d O
p x
N M
a
Z
V 4N
z
U
O,^^0 0
cO xa
c 2 O
Q ?OK wd
W hs
O
V
ri
tt!
G
0 0
OI Nof
Nri
r
l:
rl
MI
aU
I 0
Z Q0
0 0
Om LLw
O 1
N C
ON
Q
0 N
NN
a
z
VwmN ZONZ
ww
0Z
Da
w
W
a
U O
Z O
2 ON
Nww
UV nOUl
W v
w
Qt'
n
N01
Ndn1ri
Nn
ra m
O
w C of
0 0- o
0 . 0 T E
O IUl
y
O I
O
O I
N CO
O
Z
S
0 0 0 02 3 0 - 000 3 °
0 o
o
o•? mew
N
s W^ 0 VO J C } v
c u 0
v
rn3- o 0 c'- O 0 N' O 0- E
0, 5: D_ Ln
CL C00 O
0 N O u v V
L
C « N
0 c v ' n E 0 0-
U
3 0 mo
C
a c
0 O c C' p J
Y C E w
Q N
o- o TYOd
Q N
mE O

Q N Q N
v
N °>
c mom" o d c
ri
J J 0- 0 in 0
0 i/ m
a c!
1 a
w z ik z& Z ik z
o
k
w 0 v O O V O
a+ to
0 m w
0 w
J
d
Q J
v
Q J
Z o
Q
0 1i
0 Nm MS Nc
co
a o 1' o o f
o
O
Z Z Z
a Z
i to J W W J w J m J
0 t0 F y N F ° fd
14 Q
W N
R{
am
to
g
cn rn
0 b
Z
a
NOUGH 3
O n
Qt'
n
N01
Ndrin1
Nn
Ta
o c' C
j
O
w C of
0 0- o
0 . 0 T E
O IUl
y
O I
0 V N E° V
O I
N CO
O
Z
S
0 0 0 02 3 0 - 000 3 °
0 o
o
o•? mew
Z
s W^ 0 VO J C } v
c u 0
v
rn3- o 0 c'- O 0 N' O 0- E
0, 5: D_ Ln
CL C00 O
0 N O u v V
L
C « N
0 c v ' n E 0 0-
U
3 0 mo
C
a c
0 O c C' p J
Y C E w
Q N
o- o TYOd
Q N
mEO

Q N Q N
v
N °>
c mom" o d c
ri
J J 0- 0 in 0
0 i/ m
a c!
1 mac 0Ea o
w z ik z& Z ik z
o
k
w 0 v O O V O O U 0 0 0
0 Q J V Q J V Q J V Q J
Qt'
n
N01
Ndn1ri
Nn
En
rVWN
OO
f7
j F 0
CD 6
OC ad. W Nid
000 a U
m
Z u 00
O Z > a 0
0 i
Q ? a
T
aim 0- y0
Ta
o c' C
j
O
w C of
0 0- o
0 . 0 T E
w
O- O>
N C
y
D
C O
J O o
0 V N E° V J
y 0- 0 0 0- 0 O N CO O
TY
Z
S
0 0 0 02 3 0 - 000 3 °
0 o
o
o•? mew
Z
s W^ 0 VO J C } v
c u 0
v
rn3- o 0 c'- O 0 N' O 0- E
0, 5: D_ Ln
CL C00 O
0 N O u v V
L
C « N
0 c v ' n E 0 0-
U
3 0 mo
C
a c
0 O c C' p J
Y C E w O in
o- o TYOd
0 Y '^ 0 N N N 3 mE O
d O
Tc N° O c c v
N °>
c mom" o d c
ri
J J 0- 0 in 0
0 i/ m
a c!
1 mac 0Ea o
it
O' C O V- 0 N - a O C T
y E E E o} c
o
r Y.
n CL N E ' n : t T Q CL 0 O
0 ° ate ` o c° o ma
O. uM.. J3
Y
o
11 QC ' O N D .,.
mK^ hOdm
1i
Nm MS Nc
co
O
M 0 rl
0 14
W N
am g a
0 Z
NOUGH 3
1HNMO 1: 111" 4XV
En
rVWN
OO
f7
j F 0
CD 6
OC d. Wa Nid
000 a U
m
Z u 00
O Z > a 0
0 i
Q ? a
T
aim0- y0
Ta
o c' C
j
O
w C of
0 0- o
0 . 0 T E
w
O- O>
N C
y
D
C O
J O o
0 V N E° V J
y 0- 0 0 0- 0 O N CO O
TY O
S
0 0 0 02 3 0 - 000 3 °
0 o
o
o•? mew E
s W^ 0 VO J C } v
c u 0
v
rn3- o 0 c'- O 0 N' O 0- E
0, 5: D_ Ln
CL C00 O
0 N O u v V
L
C « N
0 c v ' n E 0 0-
U
3 0 mo
C
a c
0 O c C' p J
Y C E w O in
o- o TYOd
0 Y '^ 0 N N N 3 mEO
L
E _ Er o-0
Tc N° O c c v
N °>
c mom" o d c E°
J J 0- 0 in 0
0 on
H •= C O_ C C 3 J
c o u a c!
1 mac 0Ea o y°
O' C O V- 0 N - a O C T
y E E E o} c
o
r Y.
n CL N E ' n : t T Q CL 0 O
0 ° ate ` o c° o ma
nO Ci
o w
N
a
m
o c
n
riO
ri
to
V' n
riN
rn0
CaiN
Nyr
O
r
V
lJ
d ss I
Nm
N40 nC" tD
m. Mio
Z
Y
W
V
N
U
D
a
i u
O ri0o coo t 0 0
19 O' N u O 4 ON
N N M n N
co
1 z
943
p
y
r Y.
4 O. uM.. J3
Y
o
QC ' O n N D .,.
mK^ hOdm p
Nm MS Nc O
Z
Y
W
V
N
U
D
179a
Proiect Location:

FRONTAGE ON
EXHIBIT " B" -
348 Poplar St.

APN 064- 202 - 380
Poplar St. 57. 0 lineal feet
Charges based on $ 75. 00 per lineal
foot for sidewalk, curb and gutter,
storm drain across project frontage
to Citv standard, and underground; ng
of all utilities ( gas, electric,
sewer, telephone and cable TV).

75. 00 x 57. 0. lineal feet = $ 4, 275. 00
TOTAL DUE: $ 4, 275. 00
t0
Ut
7 iU
180
352 POPLAR STREET
APN: 064-202-390
RESO NO. C-05-08 181
RESOLUTION NO. C- 05 - 08

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY

AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A STREET AGREEMENT WITH

AYAD AL- SHAIKH AND SARA POLGAR
FOR 352 POPLAR STREET — APN# 064 - 202 -390
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Half Moon Bay, San Mateo County, California that
WHEREAS, Ayad AI- Shaikh and Sara Polgar applied for and received a building permit # ABC 24729), conditionally issued pending approval of a Street Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City Council requires execution of an agreement to participate in an assessment district for certain improvements; and
WHEREAS, such an agreement has been submitted to the City Council for approval.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY DETERMINED AND ORDERED, as follows; That particular Street Agreement dated December 15, 2007 and signed by Ayad AIShaikh and Sara Polgar is approved and that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the Street Agreement on behalf of the City, and
That the City Clerk, or her designated representative, is directed to forward this fully executed Street Agreement to the San Mateo County Recorder' s Office for recording.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Half Moon Bay, San Mateo County, California, at a meeting thereof held on the 15th day of January 2008, by the following vote of the members thereof:

AYES, Councilmembers Fraser, Grady, Muller, Patridge & Mayor McClung NOES, Councilmembers
ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:
r
B ie McClung, MAYO ,
ATTEST:

Siobhan Smith, CITY CLERK
182
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

Siobhan Smith, City Clerk
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City Clerk
City of Half Moon Bay
501 Main Street
Half Moon Bay, CA 94019
650) 726- 8271
January 29, 2008
2008- 012168
09: 57am 02/ 06/ 08 AG Fee: NO FEE
Count of pages 6
Recorded in Official Records
County of San Mateo
Warren Slocum
Assessor -County Clerk -Recorder
I II I I i I fll llll! III I! II II I! III I
fl1
I

I I , ISI I I I II I , II ,III IIS
20080012168AR

THIS SPACE FOR RECORDER USE ONLY

STREET AGREEMENT

TITLE OF DOCUMENT
Street Agreement between the City of Half Moon Bay and
Ayad AI -Shaikh and Sara Polgar
352 Poplar Street
APN 064- 202- 390
183
STREET

AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this I fday of pc-c0^ S& 4, , 2007, by and between the City of Half Moon Bay, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called " CITY", and Ayad AI -Shaikh and Sara Polgar, hereinafter called " PERMITTEE".

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, PERMITTEE is the owner of real property in the City of Half Moon Bay, County of San Mateo, State of California, located at 352 Poplar Street has requested a building permit from the CITY concerning the construction of a building upon the real property described APN# 064- 202- 390, Lot# 10 & 11, Subdivision: Arleta Park 2nd Addition, Building Permit # ABC -24729 and
WHEREAS, PERMITTEE is required to provide certain necessary public improvements horeinafte. spe-- ificd, in conflrnance with the quir- ments of CITY
which will benefit and improve the real property described; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the granting of a building permit, PERMITTEE is required, at his own cost and expense, to provide minimum access to the property consistent with the requirements of Chapter 14. 12 of the Municipal Code.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED TO BY THE PARTIES, as follows:

1. The real property subject to this Agreement is described as: APN# 064- 202- 390, Lot# 10 & 11, Subdivision Arleta Park 2nd Addition, Building Permit # ABC -24729

2. PERMITTEE agrees to provide access to the property pursuant to Chapter

14. 12 of the Municipal Code which, for the PERMITTEE' s property, shall be an:

CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX)
existing partially improved street
existing interim private street
interim private street constructed by applicant

INITIALS)

3. PERMITTEE agrees to cooperate with other property owners, the CITY and other public agencies to design and provide any or all of the public improvements set forth in Exhibit " A" of this Agreement when requested by the City Engineer or under a joint cooperative plan including the formation of an assessment project under appropriate improvements procedures and/ or bond acts, if such a program is undertaken by the CITY to secure the installation and construction of the improvements.

PERMITTEE' s signature hereto shall be deemed to be his signature ( binding on his successor and assigns, if any) on a petition for formation of an assessment district that may be utilized by CITY under any appropriate improvement act provided by state law for the completion of any or all such improvements.

Pagel of 3
184

4. PERMITTEE agrees to dedicate necessary street right- of-way and easements commensurate with CITY requirements and shall deliver to CITY such rights- of-way and easements as may be required at the time of receiving notification from CITY to proceed with construction of the public improvements. Dedication shall be limited to a twenty-five foot (25') half street and PERMITTEE agrees to appropriate set back requirements for future widening of street rights- of-way.

5. This Agreement shall be recorded by the CITY. All covenants herein contained shall pertain to and run with the real property described herein, and the Agreement shall apply to, bind, and inure to the heirs, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto.

6. In the event of litigation over this Agreement or its performance, the prevailing party shall receive attorneys' fees and costs.

7. This Agreement is subject to City Council approval. The PERMITTEE understands that if the City Council does not approve this Agreement, all work pursuant to the permit issued in consideration of this Agreement may be stopped.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers on the date and year first above written.

CITY"
REVIEWED BY: CITY OF HALF MOON BAY
r
r-r e ' Na, i; Marcia Raines
s ' rec ?f,o -
City Manager
ATTEST:

Siobhan Smith, City Clerk
PERMITTEE" yL
Note: " PERMITTEE" shall have his/ her signature( s) notarized, with the Notary Public' s certification clearly attached to this document.

185

CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of - ' 5 . r, X- -,-_ 0
ss.

On dila(_ / 2/ 7% before me, L\4 L., -,n ' C / r %
Dale[. G.(
Name and Title of Officer ( e. g.. " Jane DQ' NotaryNotary Public') personally appeared
4 /_/) i4 Lam`
AlunlO ArE[ U
Comm. # 145T3'4 ,
A
NOTARY PUBLIC- CALIFOft V! CiIY t< Counf Comm. yi1
S011
JanFiBncloo Fz A
2008
Name( s) of Signer(s)
personally known to me
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person vhose name i<s/ 4re subscribed
to the within instrument and ac n edge to me that
he/ they executed the sameer/their
orized capacity( ies), and that by rs/ er/their
signatur n the instrument the persoor the
entity upon behalf of which the person qLacted,
executed the instrument.

WITNES my hand and offi I seal.

Place Notary Seal Above
Signature of Notary Public

OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.

Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document:

Document Date:

Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:

Capacity( ios) Claimed by Signer( s)
Signer's Name:
u Individual
I_i Corporate Officer— Title( s):

L7 Partner — Limited General
J Attorney in Fact
Ci Trustee
C] Guardian or Conservator
j Other:

Signer Is Representing:

GHT THUMBPRINT

OF SIGNER
of thumb here
Number of Pages:

Signer' s Name:

Individual
Corporate Officer — Title(s):

Partner — Limited General
Attorney in Fact
Trustee
Guardian or Conservator
Other:

Signer Is Representing:

RIGHT THUM© PRINT

OF SIGNER
TOP of thumb her
u 2004 National Notary Association • 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 • Chatsworth, CA 91313-2402 Item No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toll -Free 1- 600. 876. 6627 186

CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of 9ATA G L_&& A
On Z 3I ?_ Oa -7 before me, FL_ I aS W1 EWtd / N° T!jAy P tIBLI c , D toameand Title of Offic ( e.g., " Jane Doe, Nota Pubic") personally appeared SAA A SLI 7-4 Lr jH Po L ftA a
Names) of Signer( s)
personally known to me
or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence)
to be the person( 4Shose name( Wis/subscribed to the
within instrument and acknowledged to me that
I5s r n J:y , l lshe/tW executed the same in hi ller/their authorized Com " bi "'
3o7
iso#cry P+r; ic capacity(iq< and that by hWher/tlae(r signaturef* on the California r,;nfo c" .,--: i County instrument the person(} or the entity upon behalf of WCarrm. ExpiresAug12, 20Q4 which the personKacted, executed the instrument.

WITNESS my hand and official seal. tthel dSm
aY
that the foregoing pwWWh is true and
p,..
correct
Place Notary Seal Above Signature / —"- gy '
Signature of Notary Public

OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.

Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document: 5TA C-07 A* R - rll T
Document Date:

Signer( s) Other Than Named Above:

Capacity( ies) Claimed by Signer(s)
Signer' s Name:

Individual
Corporate Officer — Title( s):

Partner — Limited General
Attorney in Fact •
Trustee
rT. of thumb here
Guardian or Conservator
Other:

Signer Is Representing:

Number of Pages:

Signer's Name:

Individual
Corporate Officer — Title( s):

Partner — Limited General
Attorney in Fact
Trustee
Guardian or Conservator
Other:

Signer Is Representing:

RIGHTTHUMBPRINT

OF SIGNER
0 2006 National Notary Association • 9350 De Soto Ave., P.O. Box 2402 • Chatsworth, CA 91313- 2402 J
Item No. 5907 v609 Reorder: Call TDII- Free 1- 800- 876- 6627 187
EXHIBIT " A"
STREETIMPROVEMENTS1. Clearing and grubbing

2. Grading

3. Earthwork

4. Subbase

5. Base

6. Paving

7. Curb and gutter

8. Sidewalk

9. Handicap curb ramps

10. Storm drain

11. Sanitary sewer

12. Manholes

13. Catch basins

14. Culverts

15. Underground electric power

16. Underground communications ( telephone, cable TV)

17. Underground gas

18. Water main and service

19. Street signs

20. Survey monuments

21. Relocation of existing utilities

22. Erosion control

23. Engineering

24. Construction inspection

25. Contingencies

188
355 POPLAR STREET
APN: 064-201-220
RESO NO. C-14-90 189
RESOLUTION NO. 14 - 90

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF HALF MOON BAY AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A

STREET ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT WITH
WESLAN DEVELOPMENT, INC.
355 POPLAR ( APN 064 - 201 - 220)
WHEREAS, Weslan Development, Inc. has applied for and
received a building permit; and
WHEREAS, the City Council requires execution of an
agreement to participate in an assessment district for
certain improvements; and
WHEREAS, such agreement has been submitted to the City
Council and approved by the City Council:

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City
Council of the City of Half Moon Bay that that particular Agreement dated August 11, 1989, and signed by Warren D.

Lewis, Secretary /Treasurer for Weslan Development, Inc. is approved and the City Manager is hereby authorized to
execute said Agreement ( Exhibit A hereto) on behalf of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Half Moon Bay at a regular meeting thereof held April 17, 1990, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers: Bedesem, Eriksen, Patridge, Patterson NOES, Councilmembers: None
ABSTAIN, Councilmembers: Iverson
ABSENT, Councilmembers: None
KA c X /ga
Helen Bedesem, Mayor
ATTEST:

Donna Riso, City Clerk
190
WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF HALF MOON BAY
P. o. Wx 67
HALF MOON BAY, CA 94019
HF
to C
LN : _ L!., r of
3df
AF ° 90 f 3Y 14 Pn 2 13
11' 19,'' J-' ' Il I
RESOLUTION NO. 14 - 90 LhDLI
fiTr y
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THL j

CITY OF HALF MOON BAY AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A

STREET ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT WITH
WESLAN DEVELOPMENT, INC.
355 POPLAR ( APN 064 - 201 - 220)
WHEREAS, Weslan Development, Inc. has applied for and
received a building permit; and
WHEREAS, the City Council requires execution of an
agreement to participate in an assessment district for
certain improvements; and
WHEREAS, such agreement has been submitted to the City
Council and approved by the City Council:

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City
Council of the City of Half Moon Bay that that particular Agreement dated August 11, 1989, and signed by Warren D.

Lewis, Secretary /Treasurer for Weslan Development, Inc. is approved and the City Manager j hereby authorized to
execute said Agreement ( Exhibit A hereto) on behalf of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Half Moon Bay at a regular meeting thereof held April 17, 1990, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers: Bedesem, Eriksen, Patridge, Patterson NOES, Councilmembers: None
ABSTAIN, Councilmembers
ABSENT, Councilmembers:
r.

ATTEST.- "
Donna Riso, City Clerk
Iverson
None
Helen Bedesem, Mayor
I hereby certify that the foregoing is
S true Md Correct copy of the originw
document on file in the office of the
CityCierkofthr 91tyof Half Moon Bav
Date:

City Clerk:
4 7
Q
CJ
2` J
W
191
355 POPLAR
APN 064 - 201 - 220)
S T R F. E T
A G R F. F M F tJ T
THIS AGREEMENT. made and entered into this 11
day of August__.. 19. 89 by and between the Citv of
Half Moon Bay. a municinal corporation. hereinafter called CITY ", and WESLAN Development, Inc.
herei.nafter called " PERMITTEE ".

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, Permittee is the owner of real nronerty in the City of Half Moon Bay, County of San Mateo, State of California. and has requested a building permit from the Citv concerning the construction of a building upon the real property described in the building permit attached 'hereto, and
WHEREAS. Permittee is required to provide certain necessary public improvements, hereinafter specified, in conformance with the requirements of City which will benefit and improve the real property described; and
WHEREAS, in consideration of the granting of a building permit, Permittee is required, at his own cost and expense, to provide minimum access to the nronerty consistent with the requirements of Chapter 14. 12 of the Municipal Code, and place ir, a Street Improvement Fund a deposit equal to the amount of the estimated improvement adjacent to the described _property, estimate attached, andNOW. THEREFORE. IT IS HEREBY AGREED TO BY THE PARTIES. as follows:

1. The real nronerty subject to this Agreement is
described in the building permit attached hereto as Exhibit " A"

2. Permittee agrees to provide access to the property
pursuant to Chapter 14. 12 of the Municipal Code which, for the nermittee' s property shall be an:

Ifd existing partially improved street
existing interim private street
interim nrivate street
constructed by the applicant

3. Permittee agrees to pay to the City the sum shown in Exhibit " B" attached hereto for the street improvements set forth therein.

4. Permittee agrees to cooperate with other property
owners, the City and other public agencies to provide the public improvements set forth in Exhibit " B" of this agreement under a 1-
t0
O
O
U1
192
NLn
Q
Z
O
4A
V O
U.

O .

WRDZ
N o
90065323
d
2 o
U O w
N b
0 000
Nl
z x
x
O
V
ry
z
z
0 W m
Z0
y O
Qoca 60
0 0V
193
io i.,t c000erat.i.ve Z.. includ.in.g the formation an assessment prciect under appropriate improvements procedures and / or bond acts; if such a n_roaram is undertaken by the Citv to secure the installation and construction of the improvements. Permittees signature hereto shall be deemed to be his signature ( binding on his successor and assigns, if any) on a petition for formation of an assessment district which may be utilized by City under any appropriate improvement act orovided by state law for the completion of any or all such improvements.
5• The Permittee agrees to dedicate necessary street
right -of -way and easements commensurate with City requirements and shall deliver to City such rights -of -way and easements as may be required at the time of receiving notification from City to proceed with construction of the public improvements. Dedication shall be limited to a thirty -foot ( 30'.) half street and Permittee agrees to appropriate set back requirements for future widening of street rights- of -way.

6. This Agreement shall be recorded by City. All
covenants herein contained shall pertain to and run with the real property described herein, and this Agreement shall apply to, bind and inure to the heirs, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto.

7. In the event an assessment district is formed, permittee' s deposit will be credited towards his share of the improvements thereof.

8. In the event of litigation over this Agreement or its performance, the prevailing party shall receive attorneys fees and costs.

9. This Agreement is subject to Council approval. The
Permittee understands that if the City Council does not approve this agreement, all work pursuant to the permit issued in consideration of this agreement may be stopped.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers on the day and year first above written.

CITY" CITY OF HALF MOON BAY
Citv Manaoer

ATTEST -
WESLAN DEVEhOPMIIVT, INC.

City. Clerk -'
PERMITTEE" _ _ --;
Warren D. Lewisiji
2-
O
O
fie.+
W
194
i
n
T
O
I
a Igo Igo
aO Gt
iw — aam
I" I Ll.

I
J0
N
a
n
O
n
c
Z
n<
c
ti
m
9 O
0 Qc
a
N
SR
O • w O
mr
0 N
tPa
O J SN Q So S
N
K T N' j
N N
r
0'< 3 ° 3 aLk 0 0 O 6 N S + P. N
O
3 T
C ptN 01
o N o
0- M
Q
N
f9
O
m
o° aoc o 00
V
Q3
v
a on
n: o sm
m 0 n
O
1D oo n 3m
c O
O
A
D•
V V V Qp
o s 9_
nS n c n
O W n T O N
c
3O' ND
0 0_ CL n O Q•
N
N Ta m. i
o
m °
n
N
OCD cG'
O_ , N
N 3• p ado Q -
w
0 Q H
07 O
U,•. N TO D O
rn
y
n03aa
m
mpg °$ Lr
0 6. F N•
W n <
o - 0 H
O
0 N Q
p pC
Fi c
O n
O
A
O
JJ
O
1 O
I
a Igo Igo
aO Gt
iw — aam
I" I Ll.

I
J0
N
a
n
O
n
c
Z
n<
c
ti
m
9 O
0 Qc
a
N
SR
O • w O
mr
0 N
tPa
fD n O J SN Q So S
N
K T N' j
N N
r
0'< 3 ° 3 aLk 0 0 O 6 N S + P. N
O
3 T
C ptN 01
o N o
0- M
Q
N
f9
O
m
o° aoc o 00
V
Q3
v
a on
fD n O J SN Q So S
H K T N' j
N N
m
0'< 3 ° 3 aLk 0 0 O 6 N S +
vi O' P. N
s- (D
y N N
3 T
C ptN 01
o N o
0- M
Q
O
f9
n Q
N
c . O_
m
00 o° aoc o
Q3
0 n: o sm
m 0 n
O
1D oo n 3m
r!c O 3 N O' 3 OO
t*
A
D•
o5' m sm
v Q 3° 5
o s 9_
nS n c n
O W n T O N
c
3O' ND
0 0_ CL n O Q•
N
N Ta m. i
o
m °
n
N
OCD cG'
O_ , N
N 3• p ado Q -
w
0 Q H
07 O
U,•. N TO D O
rn
y
n03aa
m
f= N O cmamco c
p O n O'=
0 6. F N•
W n <
o - 0 H
O
0 N Q
p Cp N O c c
O
Y =
O O O
O n
1 v O Mt
m
6P
m
a
yy
m
Z°
f1 O O
A y
N A
1°
11l-A
m
Ay
Q
O D
o O
A y
N
O
m
Q
m
r
ZO
CMMCT.... OWNER] MS . bESCRIPTION CR
m
Q
H
D
8 Q
O
f9 m
o
m mm
y
t*
A
N D• W
Z N
Y ...
n
Ul
w
@O+
r
rn
y
ON
I
CJ
IA
ft

O O O O
A
O
JJ
O
1 v O
A Z
M Dn
O
mr
mm
H
n
r
m
N
m
n2
ZF)
r
my
3 LT
O O
O mm
II
D
m
Nr
IO0
b
m
Q
H
Z
8 Q
O
f9 m
o
m mm
VI qQq
t*
N D• W
O
n
O
w
m
rn
m
ON
I
CJ aru

O O O O
mm
H
n
r
m
N
m
n2
F) Z
r
my
3 LT
O O
O mm
II
D
m
Nr
IO0
b
m
Q
Z
1 Q
O
n
o
N
VI qQq
t*
N WD• b
n
rn w
i
ON rn
I
CJ aru
A
O
JJ
O
1 Do O
n m N N N
m
v O O m 30> Z O4 p3
A m
Uz
m an

W Z O Z O
N G
H
rr
n
7 R OC
N y
ON *.

H
A 9
n m4
0 3
v
H
7c
s.
m
Z Q
O
tio
N WND• b
rnON wrn I
O
O
H
rr
n
7 R OC
N y
ON *.

H
A 9
n m4
0 3
v
H
7c
s.
195
Project Location:

FRONTAGE ON
ENHI BIT " B" -
355 Poplar St.

APN 064 - 201 - 220
Poplar St. 57. 0 lineal feet
Charges based on $ 75. 00 per lineal
foot for sidewalk, curb and gutter.
storm drain across project frontage
to City standard, and undergrounding
of all utilities ( gas, electric,
sewer; telephone and cable TV).

75. 00 x 57. 0. lineal feet = $ 4, 275. 00
TOTAL DUE: $ 4, 275. 00
O
O
7 C11
W
s
L.:
196
360 POPLAR STREET
APN: 064-202-540
RESO NO. C-30-08 197
RESOLUTION NO. C- 30 - 08

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY

AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A STREET AGREEMENT WITH

JOHN STAMPER, RICHARD HERNANDEZ, AND HILLARY STAMPER
360 POPLAR STREET — APN# 064 - 212 -540
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Half Moon Bay, San Mateo County, California that
WHEREAS, John Stamper, Richard Hernandez, and Hillary Stamper applied for and received a building permit # ( ABC 24749), conditionally issued pending approval of a Street Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City Council requires execution of an agreement to participate in an assessment district for certain improvements; and
WHEREAS, such an agreement has been submitted to the City Council for approval.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY DETERMINED AND ORDERED, as follows; That particular Street Agreement dated January 23, 2008 signed by John Stamper and particular Street Agreement dated May 9, 2008 signed by Richard Hernandez and Hillary Stamper are approved and that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the Street Agreements on behalf of the City, and
That the City Clerk, or her designated representative, is directed to forward these fully executed Street Agreements to the San Mateo County Recorder's Office for recording.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Half Moon Bay, San Mateo County, California, at a meeting thereof held on the 20th day of May 2008, by the following vote of the members thereof:

AYES, Councilmembers
NOES, Councilmembers
Fraser, Grady, Muller, Patridge & Mayor McClung
ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

ATTEST:

Siobhan Smith, CITY CLERK Bonnie McC ung, MAYOR
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
428 POPLAR STREET
APN: 064-232-360
RESO NO. C-25-02 205
r
RESOLUTION NO. C- 25 - 02 •

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY

AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A STREET AGREEMENT WITH HELEN J. CAREY FOR 428 POPLAR STREET - APN 064-232-360
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Half Moon Bay, San Mateo County, California that
WHEREAS, Helen J. Carey has applied for and received a building permit (ABC 21180), conditionally issued pending approval of a Street Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City Council requires execution of an agreement to participate in an assessment district for certain improvements; and
WHEREAS, such an agreement has been submitted to the City Council for approval by the City Council.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY DETERMINED AND ORDERED, as follows; That particular Street Agreement dated March 8, 2002 and signed by Helen J. Carey is approved and that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute Street Agreement on behalf of the City, and
That the City Clerk, or her designated representative, is directed to forward this fully executed Street Agreement to the San Mateo County Recorder's Office for recording.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Half Moon Bay, San Mateo County, California, at a meeting thereof held on the 7th day of May 2002, by the following vote of the members thereof:

AYES, Councilmembers Coleman, Grady, Ferreira & Mayor Taylor NOES, Councilmembers
ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers: Ruddock
Toni Taylor, MAY
ST:

PASAD i ND ADOPTED 1/ MEETING OF
Dorothy R. Robbi , CITY CLERK U

CITY CLERK
206
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
lv DOG 20O2- 125996
Dorothy R. Robbins, City Clerk
06/ 21