CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
CITY OF HALF MOON BAY
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2022
REMOTE PARTICIPATION (SEE NEXT PAGE) Debbie Ruddock, Mayor Deborah Penrose, Vice Mayor
Robert Brownstone, Councilmember
Joaquin Jimenez, Councilmember
Harvey Rarback, Councilmember
7:00 PM
This agenda contains a brief description of each item to be considered. Those wishing to address the City Council on any matter not listed on the Agenda, but within the jurisdiction of the City Council to resolve, may come forward to the podium during the Public Forum portion of the Agenda and will have a maximum of three minutes to discuss their item.
Those wishing to speak on a Public Hearing matter will be called forward at the appropriate time during the Public Hearing consideration.
Please Note: Anyone wishing to present materials to the City Council, please submit seven copies to the City Clerk.
Copies of written documentation relating to each item of business on the Agenda are on file in the Office of the City Clerk at City Hall and the Half Moon Bay Library where they are available for public inspection. If requested, the agenda shall be available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132.) Information may be obtained by calling 650-726- 8271.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, special assistance for participation in this meeting can be obtained by contacting the City Clerk’s Office at 650-726-8271. A 48-hour notification will enable the City to make reasonable accommodations to ensure accessibility to this meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II). http://hmbcity.com/
1 SPECIAL REMOTE PARTICIPATION PROTOCOLS
This meeting will be held entirely by teleconference. All Councilmembers and staff will only participate via the Zoom platform using the process described below. The meeting is being conducted pursuant to recent amendments to the teleconference rules required by the Ralph M. Brown Act allowing teleconferencing during a proclaimed state of emergency when local officials have recommended social distancing (AB 361). The purpose of AB 361 is to provide the safest environment for the public, elected officials, and staff while allowing for continued operation of the government and public participation during the COVID‐19 pandemic.
This meeting will be conducted via Zoom Webinar and live Spanish interpretation will be available within the Zoom platform. Members of the public are welcome to login into the webinar as Attendees. During any public comment portions, attendees may use the “raise your hand” feature and will be called upon and unmuted when it is their turn to speak. The meeting will also be streamed on Channel 27, on pacificcoast.tv, and on Facebook at www.facebook.com/cityofhalfmoonbay. Please click to join the webinar: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/99588947925 or join by phone at 669-900-9128, using Webinar ID 995-8894-7925. If joining by phone, use *9 to raise your hand, *6 to mute and unmute.
CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
PUBLIC FORUM
PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE MONTH PROCLAMATION
VETERANS DAY PROCLAMATION
MAYOR'S ANNOUNCEMENTS OF COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES AND COMMUNITY SERVICE
REPORT OUT FROM RECENT CLOSED SESSION MEETINGS
CITY MANAGER UPDATES TO COUNCIL
INTRODUCTION OF NEW STAFF
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
1.A WAIVE READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
1.B APPROVE CITY’S RESPONSE TO THE AUGUST 9, 2022 GRAND JURY REPORT ENTITLED A DELICATE BALANCE BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE AND POWER: GOVERNMENT TRANSPARENCY AND THE PUBLIC’S RIGHT TO KNOW”
Staff Recommendation: By motion, authorize the Mayor to sign and submit a letter of response to the August 9, 2022 Grand Jury Report titled “A Delicate Balance between Knowledge and Power: Government Transparency and the Public’s Right to Know.”
STAFF REPORT
2 ATTACHMENT 1
ATTACHMENT 2
1.C QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 Staff Recommendation: Accept the Quarterly Financial Report for the 1st Quarter of Fiscal Year 2022-23.
STAFF REPORT
ATTACHMENT 1
1.D TREASURER’S REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 Staff Recommendation: By motion, accept the Treasurer’s Report for the quarter ending September 30, 2022.
STAFF REPORT
ATTACHMENT 1
1.E FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH SWCA, INC.
FOR HALF MOON BAY CORPORATION YARD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT (CIP NO. 9023) Staff Recommendation: Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a First Amendment to the Professional services agreement with SWCA, Inc.in the amount of $30,609 for biological and environmental services for the Corporation Yard Improvements Project (CIP No. 9023).
STAFF REPORT
RESOLUTION
ATTACHMENT 1
2. ORDINANCES AND PUBLIC HEARINGS
3. RESOLUTIONS AND STAFF REPORTS
3.A CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN, BUILDING ELECTRIFICATION AND EV/PV
REACH CODE UPDATE
Staff Recommendation: Receive an update on the progress and schedule for the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP), Building Electrification Ordinance, and EV/PV Reach Code.
3 STAFF REPORT
3.B STUDY SESSION – POPLAR BEACH OFF-LEASH PILOT PROJECT (JIMENEZ) Staff Recommendation: Conduct a study session and consider whether to direct staff to initiate work on developing a pilot project allowing dogs off-leash on a portion of Poplar Beach.
STAFF REPORT
ATTACHMENT 1
ATTACHMENT 2
COMMISSION / COMMITTEE UPDATES
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
FUTURE ITEMS
ADJOURNMENT
4 BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY
AGENDA REPORT
For meeting of: November 1, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
VIA: Matthew Chidester, City Manager
FROM: Jessica Blair, Communications Director / City Clerk TITLE: APPROVE CITY’S RESPONSE TO THE AUGUST 9, 2022 GRAND JURY REPORT ENTITLED “A DELICATE BALANCE BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE AND POWER:
GOVERNMENT TRANSPARENCY AND THE PUBLIC’S RIGHT TO KNOW” RECOMMENDATION:
By motion, authorize the Mayor to sign and submit a letter of response to the August 9, 2022 Grand Jury Report titled “A Delicate Balance between Knowledge and Power: Government Transparency and the Public’s Right to Know.”
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with responding to the Grand Jury Report.
STRATEGIC ELEMENT:
This action supports the Inclusive Governance Elements of the Strategic Plan.
BACKGROUND:
The Grand Jury issued a report on August 9, 2022 on findings and recommendations on the California Public Records Act, which requires inspection or disclosure of governmental records availability to the public upon request. The San Mateo County Grand Jury report is included as Attachment 1.
In the report, Half Moon Bay is mentioned as being a good example of efficient and transparent Public Records Act (PRA) processes.
DISCUSSION:
As required by the San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury, for each Grand Jury finding, the City of Half Moon Bay must indicate one of the following:
1. The respondent agrees with the finding; or
2. The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding, specifying the portion of the finding that is disputed and including an explanation of the reasons therefore. 5 For each Grand Jury recommendation, the City of Half Moon Bay must indicate one of the following actions:
1. The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary of the implemented action;
2. The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with an estimated date for implementation;
3. The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and an estimated date (no later than six months from the publication elate of the report) for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or director of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency when applicable; or
4. The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or reasonable, with an explanation therefor.
The purpose of the report, or the “Issue” as summarized in the report is as follows:
The California Public Records Act requires that inspection or disclosure of governmental records be available to the public upon request. How do the cities in San Mateo County meet the requirements of this Act?
ATTACHMENT:
1. San Mateo County Grand Jury Report “A Delicate Balance between Knowledge and Power: Government Transparency and the Public’s Right to Know”
2. Response Letter to San Mateo Grand Jury
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
32 33
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 City of Half Moon Bay City Hall
501 Main St.
Half Moon Bay, CA 94019
November 1, 2022
Honorable Amarra A. Lee
Judge of the Superior Court
C/O Jenarda Dubois
Hall of Justice
400 County Center; 2nd Floor
Redwood City, CA 94063-1655
Subject: August 9, 2022 Grand Jury Report: “A Delicate Balance between Knowledge and Power: Government Transparency and the Public’s Right to Know.” Dear Honorable Judge Lee:
The City Council of the City of Half Moon Bay, at its November 1, 2022 meeting, reviewed and approved the following responses to the San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury 2021-2022 Report entitled “A Delicate Balance between Knowledge and Power: Government Transparency and the Public’s Right to Know.”
Findings
The report includes five (5) findings with the City’s response to each summarized below.
F1: Implemented. The City already has a written PRA procedure document that is circulated to all relevant staff.
F2: Implemented. City staff has already performed a cost/benefit analysis regarding the purchase of a commercial public records request software and has implemented such a software.
F3: Implemented. The City has implemented a button on its home page where the public can access public records.
F4: Implemented. The City has implemented a submittable online PRA request form.
F5: Has not yet been implemented. While the City does have a practice of proper records retention, it has not implemented a practice similar to “Records Cleanup Day.” The City Clerk’s office will evaluate the feasibility of such a practice next year. 45 City of Half Moon Bay City Hall
501 Main St.
Half Moon Bay, CA 94019
Recommendations
The report includes five (5) Recommendations with the City’s response to each summarized below.
R1 through R4: The City of Half Moon Bay has implemented the findings the Grand Jury recommends.
R5: The City of Half Moon Bay has a routine schedule for proper records retention but has not implemented the recommendation proposed by the Grand Jury. The City will evaluate the feasibility of this recommendation by July 1, 2023.
Thank you for your consideration of the foregoing.
Sincerely,
Debbie Ruddock
Mayor
46
BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY
AGENDA REPORT
For meeting of: November 1, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
VIA: Matthew Chidester, City Manager
FROM: Lisa Lopez, Administrative Services Director
Kenneth Stiles, Finance Manager
TITLE: QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF FISCAL YEAR 2022- 2023
______________________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the Quarterly Financial Report for the 1st Quarter of Fiscal Year 2022-23.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact with the acceptance of this report.
STRATEGIC ELEMENT:
This recommendation supports the Fiscal Sustainability and Inclusive Governance Elements of the Strategic Plan.
BACKGROUND:
One of the City Council strategic priorities includes planning for and implementing long-term financial stability. A key component of this goal includes preparing a quarterly financial report that would provide readers with an executive summary of the City’s current financial conditions as it relates to the annual operating budget to ensure accountability and transparency in managing public funds.
DISCUSSION:
As of September 30, 2022, the General Fund revenues totaled $3.4 million or 16% of the approved budget. General Fund expenditures total $3.6 million or 16% of budget. As stated in the attached report, revenues and expenditures are performing as anticipated. With the information available, staff holds no great concern for financial stability for the current fiscal year; however, will continue to monitor any changes that may impact the City.
ATTACHMENT:
First Quarter Financial Report as of September 30, 2022 47 CITY OF HALF MOON BAY
Quarterly Financial Report
September 30, 2022 – 25% of Year Complete
Prepared By:
Administrative Services Department
48 Funds Actual % of Budget Actual % of Budget
General Fund 3,413,946 16% 3,643,642 15.5%
Special Revenue Funds 293,650 3% 1,598,037 9.3%
Sewer Operations - 0% 1,485,343 20.6%
Sewer Capital - 0% 56,394 1.5%
Internal Service Funds 1,212 0% 596,035 38.5%
Pension Stabilization Fund - 0% 1,152,095 100.0%
TOTAL FOR ALL FUNDS 3,708,808 9% 8,531,546 15.7%
Revenues Expenditures
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
General Fund
Special Revenue Funds
Sewer Operations
Sewer Capital
Internal Service Funds
Revenue & Expenditure Summary
Revenues to Budget Expenditures to Budget
49 Department Budget Actual % of
Budget
Prior Year
Actual
Prior Year
% of Actuals
Transient Occupancy Tax 8,752,000 989,267 11% 1,244,251 $ 13% Property Taxes 3,436,620 12,489 0% 39,254 $ 1%
Sales & Use Tax 3,058,600 261,896 9% 250,382 $ 8%
Franchise Tax 836,800 - 0% - $ 0%
Business License Tax 301,000 32,675 11% 24,024 $ 8%
Charges for Services 1,769,370 380,758 22% 523,376 $ 24% Interest and Investment 88,071 - 0% - $ 0%
Other Revenues 2,530,381 1,736,860 69% 1,549,974 $ 59%
Transfers in 524,180 - 0% - $ 0%
TOTAL 21,297,021 3,413,946 16% 3,631,261 15%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Transient Occupancy Tax
Property Taxes
Sales & Use Tax
Franchise Tax
Business License Tax
Charges for Services
Interest and Investment
General Fund Revenue Summary
Revenues to Budget
50 Department Budget Actual % of
Budget
Prior Year
Actual
Prior Year
% of Actuals
Administrative Services 1,316,046 318,272 24% 246,807 $ 23% City Clerk / Communications 1,058,340 198,403 19% 196,144 $ 25% City Council 232,538 20,234 9% 25,089 $ 15%
City Managers Office 8,637,739 1,995,287 23% 790,595 $ 11% Community Development 1,998,671 368,288 18% 313,201 $ 21% Public Works 3,547,745 690,689 19% 639,234 $ 22%
Debt Service 704,410 52,468 7% 63,904 $ 5%
Non-Departmental - - - $ 0%
Operating Transfers 1,954,936 - 0% - $ 0%
Capital Transfers 4,015,419 - 0% - $ 0%
TOTAL 23,465,844 3,643,642 15.5% 2,274,974 11%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Administrative Services
City Clerk / Communications
City Council
City Managers Office
Community Development
Public Works
Debt Service
Capital Transfers
General Fund Expenditure Summary
Expenditures to Budget
51 GENERAL FUND ANALYSIS:
The General Fund is the primary operating fund of the City and is used to account for most operating activities. Table 1 below provides year-to-date through the first quarter comparable data for the current fiscal year and the prior year.
Through the first quarter, the city received $3.4 million of revenues for the fiscal year. Revenues have decreased from the prior years. While last year revenues were 15%, current fiscal year revenues are 16% of budget.
Revised
Budget
Actuals as of
09/30/2022
% of
Budget
Final
Actuals
Actuals as of
09/30/2021
% of
Actuals
Revenues
Transient Occupancy Tax 8,752,000 989,267 11% 9,442,518 1,244,251 13% Property Taxes 3,436,620 12,489 0% 4,598,752 39,254 1%
Sales & Use Tax 3,058,600 261,896 9% 3,208,517 250,382 8% Franchise Tax 836,800 - 0% 1,028,719 - 0%
Business License Tax 301,000 32,675 11% 312,608 24,024 8% Charges for Services 1,769,370 380,758 22% 2,160,017 523,376 24% Interest and Investment 88,071 - 0% (284,664) - 0%
Other Revenues 2,530,381 1,736,860 69% 2,645,612 1,549,974 59% Transfers in 524,180 - 0% 1,422,140 - 0%
Total Revenues 21,297,021 3,413,946 16% 24,534,220 3,631,261 15% Expenditures
Administrative Services 1,316,046 318,272 24% 1,077,314 246,807 23% City Clerk / Communications 1,058,340 198,403 19% 795,855 196,144 25% City Council 232,538 20,234 9% 162,955 25,089 15%
City Managers Office 8,637,739 1,995,287 23% 7,065,465 790,595 11% Community Development 1,998,671 368,288 18% 1,496,081 313,201 21% Public Works 3,547,745 690,689 19% 2,911,647 639,234 22% Debt Service 704,410 52,468 7% 1,260,001 63,904 5%
Non Departmental - - - - Operating Transfers 1,954,936 - 0% 1,871,542 - 0% Capital Transfers 4,015,419 - 0% 3,447,577 - 0%
Total Expenditures 23,465,844 3,643,642 16% 20,088,437 2,274,974 11% FY 2022-23 FY 2021-22
Table 1: First Quarter Budget to Actual Comparison
52 Expenditures through the first quarter total $3.6 million. Expenditures through the quarter has increased when compared to the same quarter in the prior year. This is primarily due to the payment for patrol services supplied by the County remitted earlier this fiscal year. Expenditures are tracking at 16% of budget.
Revenues
Table 2 below shows a year-to-date summary of actual revenues through the first quarter for fiscal years 2022-23 and 2021-22.
Transient Occupancy Tax: The City has received $989 thousand through the first quarter.
This is a decrease of $254 thousand from the prior year. This revenue stream is at 11% of budget compared to the prior year’s 13%, signaling a potential underperformance. The City will continue monitoring this revenue stream and adjust as necessary after the second quarter.
Property Taxes: Most property tax funds are received in December and April. $12 thousand in revenues have been received thus far. Property taxes are at 0% of budget as compared to the prior year’s 1%.
Sales & Use Taxes: The City received $261 thousand of sales taxes. This is a minimal increase of $11K from the prior year. This category is tracking as anticipated. All other revenues: The City received $1.7 million in other revenues. This category generally includes miscellaneous, non-material, or one-time funds. The increase in this category is mostly due to the earlier receipt of a public safety pension reimbursement from the County and additional grants funds for the CARES program. This category is tracking as anticipated.
Revised
Budget
Actuals as of
09/30/2022
% of
Budget
Actuals as of
09/30/2021
% of
Actuals
Revenues
Transient Occupancy Tax 8,752,000 989,267 11% 1,244,251 13% Property Taxes 3,436,620 12,489 0% 39,254 1%
Sales & Use Tax 3,058,600 261,896 9% 250,382 8%
Franchise Tax 836,800 - 0% - 0%
Business License Tax 301,000 32,675 11% 24,024 8%
Charges for Services 1,769,370 380,758 22% 523,376 24%
Interest and Investment 88,071 - 0% - 0%
Other Revenues 2,530,381 1,736,860 69% 1,549,974 59%
Transfers in 524,180 - 0% - 0%
Total Revenues 21,297,021 3,413,946 16% 3,631,261 15%
FY 2022-23 FY 2021-22
Table 2: First Quarter Revenues
53 Expenditures
Table 3 below shows a summary of first quarter budget-to-actual revenues for fiscal years 2022-23 and 2021-22.
General fund expenditures through the first quarter total $3.6 million or 16% of budget. The increase of expenditures from the prior year are primarily from the City remitting the $1 million payment for Sheriff patrol services. In prior years, this payment was generally made in the second quarter. Considering the above, operating expenditures are tracking as anticipated.
Budget Adjustments
Table 4 below shows a summary of council actions with potential budgetary effects during the first quarter not reflected in the numbers above.
Revised
Budget
Actuals as of
09/30/2022
% of
Budget
Final
Actuals
Actuals as of
09/30/2021
% of
Budget
Expenditures
Administrative Services 1,316,046 318,272 24% 1,077,314 246,807 23% City Clerk / Communications 1,058,340 198,403 19% 795,855 196,144 25% City Council 232,538 20,234 9% 162,955 25,089 15%
City Managers Office 8,637,739 1,995,287 23% 7,065,465 790,595 11% Community Development 1,998,671 368,288 18% 1,496,081 313,201 21% Public Works 3,547,745 690,689 19% 2,911,647 639,234 22% Debt Service 704,410 52,468 7% 1,260,001 63,904 5%
Non-Departmental - - - - Operating Transfers 1,954,936 - 0% 1,871,542 - 0% Capital Transfers 4,015,419 - 0% 3,447,577 - 0%
Total Expenditures 23,465,844 3,643,642 16% 20,088,437 2,274,974 11% Table 3: First Quarter Expenditures
FY 2022-23 FY 2021-22
Item Major Funding Source Total Fiscal Impact GF Impact No Budgetary Adjustments During the First Quarter
Total - $ - $
Table 4: Budget Adjustments
54 Conclusion
Table 5 below shows an updated summary of general fund balances for the current fiscal year.
Considering revenues and expenditures are generally performing as anticipated, there is no great concern of fiscal instability for the current fiscal year with the information available. The unassigned funds on June 30, 2023, is estimated to be $3.6 million. These funds may formally become assigned for use during the mid-year review or the next fiscal year.
Additionally, with the strong fully funded reserves, the City is content regarding the financial stability; however, we will continue to monitor any changes that may impact the City.
FY2022-23
Adopted Budget
Beginning Fund Balance 15,585,153 Revenues 21,297,021
Expenditures (23,465,844) Budget Adjustments - Net Change to Fund Balance (2,168,823) Ending Fund Balance 13,416,330 General Fund Reserve (5,835,127) Economic Uncertainty (3,890,085) Unassigned 3,691,118
Table 6: General Fund Balance Summary
55
BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY
AGENDA REPORT
For meeting of: November 1, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
VIA: Matthew Chidester, City Manager
FROM: Lisa Lopez, Administrative Services Director
Kenneth Stiles, Finance Manager
TITLE: TREASURER’S REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 ______________________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION:
By motion, accept the Treasurer’s Report for the quarter ending September 30, 2022.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact with the acceptance of this report.
STRATEGIC ELEMENT:
This recommendation supports the Fiscal Sustainability and Inclusive Governance Elements of the Strategic Plan.
BACKGROUND:
In accordance with Government Code Section 53600 et seq., the City’s Treasurer is to provide the City Council with a report on investments on a quarterly basis. As shown in the Treasurer’s Report (Attachment 1), the City’s investments are in external investment pools listed at cost, as well as its fair value, not amortized cost, in compliance with Governmental Accounting Standard. The City’s investment practices strictly follow Government Code Section 53600 et seq., the City’s investment policy, and a prudent person’s rule.
DISCUSSION:
The City’s cash and investment portfolio, at fair market value, as of September 30, 2022, is $47.1 million of which $36.3 million is placed with the San Mateo County Treasurer’s Investment Pool and $7.6 million is placed with the State Controller’s Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), and $3.2 million in operating accounts with Wells Fargo Bank. The average weighted yield for the City’s cash and investments are 1.23 % for the quarter.
ATTACHMENT:
Treasurer’s Report for the quarter ending September 30, 2022 56 57
58
BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY
AGENDA REPORT
For meeting of: November 1, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
VIA: Matthew Chidester, City Manager
FROM: Maz Bozorginia, Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Todd Seeley, Public Works Superintendent
TITLE: FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH SWCA, INC. FOR HALF MOON B+AY CORPORATION YARD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT (CIP NO. 9023)
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a First Amendment to the Professional services agreement with SWCA, Inc.in the amount of $30,609 for biological and environmental services for the Corporation Yard Improvements Project (CIP No. 9023).
FISCAL IMPACT:
The consultant services costs are included in the Capital Improvement Program as part of the project contingency and allocated in the FY 2022-23 Capital Budget.
STRATEGIC ELEMENT:
This action supports the Infrastructure and Environment and Public Safety Elements of the Strategic Plan.
BACKGROUND:
The Half Moon Bay Public Works Corporation Yard is located at 880 Stone Pine Road. Over the last decade this site was either operated under a license agreement or lease with Peninsula Open Space Trust (POST). Currently, Public Works staff are using a portion of the site including the former ranch house as administrative offices and open areas (and a series of storage containers) to store equipment and supplies for City utility, facility and other capital maintenance.
On Friday, January 15, 2021, the City of Half Moon Bay closed escrow on the purchase of a 21- acre property at 880 Stone Pine Road. Fronting on Highway 92 near the eastern Half Moon Bay limits, the property has been leased by the City since 2009, with most of it used as the City’s 59
corporation yard facility. The purchase price was $2.18 million and was acquired from the Peninsula Open Space Trust (POST).
The Corporation Yard is a critical facility for Half Moon Bay and the greater Coastside area. The City is obligated to maintain its streets, parks, facilities, and utilities. A permanent facility is necessary on the site for maintenance staff, vehicles, equipment, and materials. This property has provided an important infrastructure for our maintenance staff to keep Half Moon Bay clean, safe, and functioning. In addition to maintenance, the property will also be used for emergency preparedness and operations.
On June 7,2022, the City Council authorized the City Manager to execute a Professional services agreement with SWCA, Inc. to provide environmental, biological, and cultural monitoring for the construction phase of the Corporation Yard Improvement Project. The amount of monitoring included in the original contract were based on pre-construction estimates.
DISCUSSION:
Staff is requesting approval of an amendment to the Professional services agreement with SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA). SWCA was initially contracted for 15 days of cultural monitoring during ground-disturbing activities. Supply chain and materials availability have forced the prime contractor (HMB Grading and Paving, Inc.) to alter their construction approach, and as a result a significant increase in the number of days in which grounddisturbing activities occur is necessary.
Staff is confident that the addition of these monitoring days will allow SWCA enough time to properly observe all the ground-disturbing activities related to the project, while keeping the City compliant with all applicable laws and regulations related to disturbing ground in known culturally sensitive areas.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution
2. Scope of Services/Proposal
60 RESOLUTION NO. C-2022-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH SWCA, INC IN THE AMOUNT OF $30,609 FOR ENVIRONMENTAL,
BIOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL MONITORING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE CORPORATION YARD IMRPOVEMENTS PROJECT (CIP PROJECT NO. 9023) WHEREAS, On March 3, 2020, the City Council authorized the City Manager to execute a Purchase and Sale Agreement to acquire 880 Stone Pine Road with the intention of continued use for a Corporation Yard; and
WHEREAS, the City entered into a Professional Services Agreement with SWCA, Inc. on June 7, 2022 to begin environmental, biological and cultural monitoring during the construction phase of the Half Moon Bay Corporation Yard Improvements Project; and WHEREAS, the City needs to amend the contract with SWCA, Inc. to increase the number of cultural monitoring days during the construction phase of the Corporation Yard Improvements Project in order to remain compliant with applicable laws and regulations involving construction in known culturally sensitive areas.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City of Half Moon Bay hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Professional services agreement with SWCA, Inc. for environmental, biological and cultural support during the construction phase of the Corporation Yard Improvements Project in the amount of $30,609. ***************************************************************** I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted on the 1st day of November 2022 by the City Council of Half Moon Bay by the following vote:
Ayes, Councilmembers: __________________________________ Noes, Councilmembers: __________________________________ Absent, Councilmembers: __________________________________ Abstain, Councilmembers: __________________________________ ATTEST: APPROVED:
___________________________ _____________________________ Jessica Blair, City Clerk Debbie Ruddock, Mayor
61 Half Moon Bay Office
60 Stone Pine Road, Suite 100
Half Moon Bay, California 94019
Tel 650.440.4160 Fax 650.440.4165
October 10, 2022
Todd Seeley
Public Works Superintendent
501 Main Street
Half Moon Bay, CA, 94019
Re: Change Order No. 1 Scope of Work and Cost Estimate to Provide Additional Cultural Resources Monitoring for the City of Half Moon Bay Corporation Yard Upgrades Project / Project Number 73718 Dear Mr. Seeley:
In accordance with your request, SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA) is pleased to submit a change order scope of work and cost estimate to continue providing cultural resources monitoring for the City of Half Moon Bay (City) Corporation Yard Upgrades Project (project). The following letter proposal details our proposed scope of work and cost estimate.
SCOPE OF WORK
PHASE 1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION
SWCA Biologist and Project Manager Jessica Henderson-McBean will continue to serve as the primary point of contact for the City and as project manager for this effort. Ms. Henderson-McBean will continue to coordinate directly with the City and contractor staff as required to ensure compliance during the project.
Additionally, due to the increased need for cultural resources monitoring, SWCA Cultural Team Lead, Christina Alonso, will serve as the assistant project manager (APM) to coordinate archaeological staffing and reporting throughout the remainder of the project.
PHASE 1 ASSUMPTIONS
• SWCA assumed up to 16 hours to provide project management and coordination under our original contract. Due to project schedule changes, and the need for additional monitoring and coordination, SWCA assumes that an additional 25 hours of project management and coordination will be required for the remainder of the project.
PHASE 3. CULTURAL SERVICES
TASK 3. CULTURAL RESOURCES MONITORING
In accordance with MM-CUL-2, SWCA will provide one archaeological monitor during ground disturbing activities, as specified in the Cultural Resources Monitoring Plan (CRMP). The archeological monitor will provide a daily monitoring report (DMR) using SWCA’s standard DMR form. DMR forms will include the 62 Change Order No. 1 – City of Half Moon Bay Corporation Yard Upgrades Project Page | 2
results of any monitoring conducted for each day.
Task 3 Assumptions:
• SWCA assumed one archeologist for up to fifteen (15), 9-hour days inclusive of travel and reporting would be required for monitoring of ground disturbing activities under our original contract. Due to project schedule changes, SWCA assumes up to an additional twenty (20), 9-hour days of cultural resources monitoring, inclusive of travel and daily reporting, will be required. As a result, up to 180 have been included for the 20 days of cultural resources monitoring.
TASK 4. CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORTING
SWCA will prepare a results report that summarizes the results of monitoring completed. The report will summarize the methods and results of the monitoring and provide background information relevant to the environmental and regulatory settings. For purposes of the scope and estimated cost, SWCA proposes to submit an initial draft of the report.
Task 4 Assumptions:
• SWCA assumes that no more than one (1) round of revisions will be required to address one (1) round of non-substantive consolidated comments.
• Up to 43 hours have been included for Task 4.
• All reports will be submitted electronically.
• SWCA assumes that no intact resources will be identified during monitoring. If archaeological resources are encountered, additional work such as data recovery or test excavations, may be required, and an additional scope and cost/authorization request will be submitted prior to providing these additional services.
COST ESTIMATE
Based on thoughtful consideration of the project requirements and a thorough estimate of the attendant labor and direct costs, SWCA proposes an additional time-and-materials budget not to exceed $30,609, bringing the total contract value to $85,334. Please see Table 1 Cost Estimate for a breakdown of costs by task.
To accommodate project changes and scheduling, it is assumed that SWCA will be able to utilize the overall project funding and will not be held to task limits so long as the overall budget is not exceeded. SWCA will submit a budget summary with each invoice to provide visibility and track monthly spending.
SWCA prides itself on providing consulting services of the highest quality and efficiency, and we look forward to continuing working with you on this project. Should you have any questions or desire additional information or materials, please contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
Jessie Henderson-McBean
Project Manager/Biologist
63 Change Order No. 1 – City of Half Moon Bay Corporation Yard Upgrades Project Page | 3
COST ESTIMATE
Table 1. Cost Estimate
PHASE/TASK ORIGINAL CONTRACT
VALUE
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 NTE TOTAL
Phase 1. Project Management and
Coordination
$2,375 $4,725 $7,100
Phase 2. Biological Services
Task 1. Pre-Construction Survey $1,857 $1,857
Task 2. Worker Environmental
Awareness Training
$752 $752
Task 3. Biological Monitoring $32,920 $32,920
Phase 3. Cultural Services
Task 1. Cultural Resources Monitoring
Plan
$1,745 $1,745
Task 2. Cultural Resources Training $1,072 $1,072
Task 3. Cultural Resources Monitoring $14,004 $19,843 $33,847 Task 4. Cultural Resources Reporting $6,041 $6,041
PROJECT TOTAL $54,725 $30,609 $85,334
64
BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY
AGENDA REPORT
For meeting of: November 1, 2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
VIA: Matthew Chidester, City Manager
FROM: Maz Bozorginia, Interim Public Works Director/City Engineer Veronika Vostinak, Public Works Program Manager
TITLE: CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN, BUILDING ELECTRIFICATION AND
EV/PV REACH CODE UPDATE
______________________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION:
Receive an update on the progress and schedule for the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP), Building Electrification Ordinance, and EV/PV Reach Code.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report. $87,000 has been budgeted in the general fund for technical assistance and outreach necessary to complete the first section of the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP) focused on climate action. $150,000 has been budgeted in the Capital Improvement Fund to fund technical assistance to complete the climate adaptation element of the CAAP.
STRATEGIC ELEMENT:
This action supports the Infrastructure and Environment and Healthy Communities and Public Safety Elements of the Strategic Plan.
BACKGROUND:
California continues to lead the fight against climate change at both the state, county, and local levels. The State passed the following legislature establishing ambitious statewide greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction goals.
• Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32, 2006) - established the goal of reducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020
• Senate Bill 32 (SB 32, 2016) - established the goal of reducing GHG emissions 40% below 1990 levels by 2030
65
• Assembly Bill 1279 (AB 1279, 2022) - established the goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2045 at the latest and maintaining net negative net emissions from that point forward
The City Council has identified sustainability as one of the top five priorities since FY 2019-20. In response to this commitment, the City Council adopted the City’s first Sustainability Implementation Plan (SIP) in November 2019 to prioritize staff projects for FY 2019-20 and 2020-21. In September 2020, the City Council adopted an updated SIP prioritizing sustainabilityrelated projects and programs through FY23-24.
Between October 2019 and January 2020, staff completed the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP) Outreach Pilot Project, which was funded by a $60,000 grant from the San Mateo County Office of Sustainability (OOS) as part of the SB-1 Caltrans Adaptation Planning Grant.
Staff worked with local community-based organizations (CBOs), to conduct 15+ climate change outreach events to youth, senior and Latinx populations. Events included focus groups, movie screenings, mural paintings, climate change presentations and workshops, a virtual reality experience, and facilitated discussions. The data gathered from these events were then presented to the City Council on January 21, 2020.
Drafting the City’s first CAAP was identified as a priority in the Sustainability Implementation Plan for FY 2020-21. Following the City Council meeting, staff issued a request for proposals (RFP) on January 28, 2020 for a CAAP-writing consultant. Four (4) proposals were received, and staff conducted interviews with the top two firms on March 3, 2020. Due to economic hardships related to the COVID-19 pandemic, staff decided to postpone executing the contract with the top consultant and pursued alternative options to develop the CAAP without depending solely on a consultant. Due to limited staff time and City Council direction to focus on building electrification and reach codes for FY20-21 and FY21-22, staff focused on outreach, development, and adoption of the Building Electrification Ordinance and the Electric Vehicle (EV) and Photovoltaic System (PV) Reach Code.
The City Council conducted a community study session on building decarbonization policy opportunities on February 2, 2021. Following community input, the City Council directed staff to prepare a draft ordinance that addressed the following policy areas:
1. No new Fuel Gas hookups; all new construction (residential and commercial) must be built all-electric
2. Any appliance that is replaced within an existing building must be replaced with an electric alternative
3. All Fuel Gas lines must be capped and/or decommissioned by January 1, 2045
4. Expand EV charging and PV system and battery installation requirements for new buildings
66
After a robust public outreach period, including one on one meetings with stakeholders, online surveys, public workshops, and multiple study sessions, the City Council adopted an EV/PV Reach Code on December 21, 2021 and the Building Electrification Ordinance on February 15, 2022.
The EV/PV Reach Code includes requirements to pre-wire for energy storage in new residential buildings, expanded PV requirements on new non-residential and hotel/motel buildings, and Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE)’s recommendations for expanded residential EV charging requirements. EV/PV Reach code was approved by the California Energy Commission on July 13, 2022.
The Building Electrification Ordinance focuses on all-electric new construction and capping and/or decommissioning any Fuel Gas connections to buildings no later than January 1, 2045.
Any requirements focused on the replacement of Fuel Gas appliances with electric alternatives were removed from the final ordinance.
DISCUSSION:
Climate Action and Adaptation Plan
Due to available resources and limited budget, staff has been working to develop the first draft of the CAAP to focus mainly on climate action, or mitigation measures focused on GHG emission reduction. Staff has been leveraging the resources available through the City’s participation in the Regional Integrated Climate Action Planning Suite (RICAPS), including technical assistance from consultants (DNV and Rincon) to update the City’s community greenhouse gas emission inventory and identify impactful GHG mitigation measures. The new GHG emission inventory will include emissions associated with methane leakage, updated offroad emissions based on new State guidance, and a change in methodology in calculating transportation related emissions. The new GHG emission inventory utilizes the origindestination vehicle miles travelled (VMT) protocol. Staff believes these changes will provide a more accurate representation of the community’s GHG emissions.
Once the new inventory was complete and previous inventories were updated to reflect these changes, City staff and Rincon began work to estimate GHG emissions through 2045, identify feasible GHG emission targets for 2030 and 2045, and refine GHG mitigation measures to include in the draft CAAP. The first draft is expected to be available for public review by midDecember.
Staff will be hosting a community workshop on November 3, 2022 from 6pm – 7pm at the Half Moon Bay Library Community Room to discuss the updated 2019 GHG inventory and provide a preview of climate action mitigation measures from the draft CAAP for feedback. 67
Simultaneously, staff has been working with the San Mateo County Resource Conservation District (RCD) to identify potential for carbon sequestration on agricultural and natural lands to support the development of the City’s CAAP. The carbon sequestration and adaptation chapters of the CAAP will follow once the draft focused on climate action mitigation is published for public review.
Building Electrification Ordinance
The City’s Building Electrification Ordinance became effective on March 17, 2022. The Ordinance requires an annual review by the City Council. Staff is providing this report in advance of the year anniversary due to the availability of new data and changes in State law which now provide clear statutory decarbonization dates.
The current Ordinance provides some flexibility for new construction projects receiving their building permits in 2022 to proceed with the construction of a building with Fuel Gas appliances so long as the applicant Electrically Pre-Wires for future electric appliances. As such, 11 building permits for new residences have been issued since the Ordinance effective date. Two were designed as all-electric and nine were designed to include Fuel Gas appliances and pre-wiring for future electric appliances. No building permits were issued for new commercial or mixeduse buildings as of October 24, 2022.
When the City Council adopted the Building Electrification Ordinance, Half Moon Bay was one of the first cities to draft an Ordinance that included provisions that required retrofit of electric appliances at the time of replacement, during renovations, and/or requirements that Fuel Gas lines be capped/decommissioned by a date certain (end of flow date). Since the Council’s consideration, San Jose, San Mateo, Portola Valley, Menlo Park, Palo Alto, and other municipalities throughout the region have seriously considered steps towards electrification of existing buildings with some cities considering adding an end of flow date to their building decarbonization strategy.
Additionally, since adoption, more incentives have become available to aid individual building owners in transitioning to all-electric. Notably, the State of California budgeted $50 Million for FY22-23 to expand TECH incentive benefits to subsidize electric appliance replacements and on the national level the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA), passed on August 16, 2022, includes over $369 billion for “energy security and climate change,” including dedicated funding to help building owners and disadvantaged communities transition to all-electric buildings. For example, $4.5 billion will be available for direct rebates for low- and moderate-income households to install electric heat pumps, heat pump water heaters, electric stoves, electric dryers, panel upgrades, electric wiring and insulation. The IRA also includes $4.5 billion in efficiency and electrification rebates, tax deductions for electric upgrades to both residential and commercial buildings, and more. Some of these incentive programs are available now where others are expected to begin in 2023.
68
EV/PV Reach Code
Since the EV/PV Reach Code included energy efficiency measures, the Ordinance required California Energy Commission (CEC) approval to become effective. The CEC considered and approved the Ordinance on July 13, 2022. Since the Ordinance has become effective, three residential projects have been issued building permits. Each of the three projects are required to pre-wire for an energy storage and install one Level 2 EV Ready circuit and one Level 1 EV Ready circuit.
The EV/PV Reach Code was adopted as a local amendment to the 2019 Building Code. Any local changes to the tri-annual building code must be re-adopted with each code cycle to remain effective. The next code cycle (2022) is expected to be considered by the City Council prior to the mandated February 2023 deadline. The 2022 Building Code update presented to City Council will include the new recommendations from PCE regarding expanded EV charging requirements. The 2022 Building Code will have more stringent requirements regarding PV and battery storage than the EV/PV Reach Code so no recommended amendments related to PV or battery storage will be included in the update.
69
BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY
AGENDA REPORT
For meeting of: November 1, 2022
TO: Honorable City Council
VIA: Matthew Chidester, City Manager
FROM: John Doughty, Interim Assistant City Manager
TITLE: STUDY SESSION – POPLAR BEACH OFF-LEASH PILOT PROJECT (JIMENEZ) ______________________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION:
Conduct a study session and consider whether to direct staff to initiate work on developing a pilot project allowing dogs off-leash on a portion of Poplar Beach.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The operating budget of the City Manager’s Office and City Attorney’s Office is sufficient to cover the cost of research and program preparation. Additional resources including signage will be necessary to implement. These costs are anticipated to be less than $10,000.
STRATEGIC ELEMENT:
This recommendation supports the Healthy Communities and Public Safety Element of the Strategic Plan.
BACKGROUND:
Earlier this year, the City Council agreed to the placement of an item on a future agenda regarding potential establishment of an area at Poplar Beach for dogs to go off-leash. The request was initiated by Council Member Jimenez and supported by the other City Council members. Over the years, residents have informally requested the City consider allowing dogs to go off-leash on Poplar Beach. There has also been a growing interest among equestrian enthusiasts to designate a specific area for off-leash activities in hopes of limiting dog/horse interactions.
The Half Moon Bay Municipal Code requires, as a condition of being allowed on a public street, sidewalk, park, school ground or any public property or upon unenclosed premises within the City to be under the control of the owner by being saddled, harnessed, haltered or leashed by a substantial chain, lead rope or leash, six foot maximum, which shall be held by some competent person capable of controlling such animal. (Section 8.40.040 A.) 70
In 2020, the City Council adopted an ordinance revising various chapters of the Half Moon Bay Municipal Code related to permissible activities in City parks and beaches. The Municipal Code acknowledges the existing dog park at Smith Field. (Section 9.13.020A.) As part of that action, the City Council revised Chapter 8, Section 8.04.040, subsection F. allowing the City Council to, by resolution, designate additional off-leash areas in parks and on beaches. Enclosed dog park areas within City parks are exempt from leash requirements given they are fully enclosed/controlled areas.
On May 3rd, as part of the annual Beach Action Plan Update, the City Council was asked to consider establishing an off-leash dog area at Poplar Beach. The City Council did not choose to proceed at that time citing a lack of specific details, concerns regarding dog/horse interface and general logistical concerns including enforcement. The May 3rd discussion lacked substantive detail and had not been vetted with the community in advance.
Subsequently, the City Manager discussed concerns regarding horse/dog interactions and means to limit those conflicts with the owner of Sea Horse Ranch (operator of a local horseback riding stable which utilizes Poplar Beach for commercial horseback riding activities). The owner has previously shared her concerns about dog/horse interactions, especially those dogs allowed off-leash at Poplar Beach. Based upon recent discussions with the Sea Horse Ranch owner and other equestrian related beach users, we believe the activities can co-exist and even benefit from designating an off-leash dog area. Limiting the area for leashed dogs would also be viewed as a positive for equestrian users as well.
In 2021, the City partnered with beach volleyball clubs and enthusiasts to create three regulation courts at the north end of Poplar Beach (generally located between the extension of Kelly Avenue and the “Slot Access”). The City approved the courts in 2022 and envisions the activity becoming a permanent seasonal activity at Poplar Beach.
DISCUSSION:
The purpose of this workshop is to accept input from the community and City Council on whether to modify how and where dogs are permitted on Poplar Beach. Many visitors choose to allow their dogs to go “off-leash” on Poplar Beach. As noted above, dogs are required by Municipal Code to be on-leash (and controlled at all times) on Poplar Beach. Unfortunately, there have been incidents involving dogs (on-and off-leash) and horses. These incidents have fortunately not resulted in significant injuries to the persons or animals, but they could have. In addition, not all beach visitors wish to share their experience with horses and/or dogs. While enforcement is an obvious response, the City lacks the resources to actively enforce leash laws on Poplar Beach particularly given the beach is open 24 hours per day, 365 days a year.
Further, enforcement does not address the visitor experience policy question.
Some in the community have suggested the creation of an off-leash dog area at Poplar Beach to: 1) legalize the activity; and 2) limit conflicts between off-leash dogs, other visitors and horses. In advance of this item, staff has taken the opportunity to look more closely at Poplar 71
Beach. One of the other policy questions for the community and City Council to answer is whether to limit on-leash activity at Poplar Beach. The other part of this equation relates to equestrian use of Poplar Beach. Any policy formulation will have to include some limits on where and possibly when equestrian activity occurs on Poplar Beach.
While all community input is critical to the formulation of any policy, staff is particularly interested in receiving initial input on two significant policy questions: 1) the concept of creating an off-leash area; and 2) if yes, whether on-leash dog activities should be limited to certain areas of Poplar Beach. Again, dog/horse conflicts have occurred with both on-and offleash dogs. There would be no limits on visitor, pedestrian or ocean access within designated areas. It would simply allow beach users to choose how they wish to enjoy Poplar Beach.
For purposes of initiating community discussion, staff has provided two potential options which provide dogs and their owners vertical access to the beach and which would limit dog interactions with equestrians; and segregate the off-leash activities from other beach users.
Staff would recommend that any designated areas extend from the base of bluff to the surf zone (Mean High Tide Line). Staff will be prepared to walk the community through the two options as part of the workshop. These by no means represent the only options available.
Despite the provision in the Municipal Code, there remains some question as to the extent of permitting required and who would retain final review/approval authority. If directed to proceed with an off-leash option, staff will conduct the necessary research and consult with district staff of the Coastal Commission.
Conclusion
Designating a portion of Poplar Beach as an off-leash area would legalize what is current practice by many beach users while allowing beach visitors and equestrians to enjoy their time at Poplar Beach absent off-leash dogs (and potentially on-leash dogs).
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Chapter 8.04 Half Moon Bay Municipal Code
2) Conceptual Options
72 Chapter 8.04
Animal Control
8.04.040 Prohibited conduct
No owner or guardian of any animal shall cause or permit it to do any of the following:
A. To be in any public street, sidewalk, park, school ground, or any public property, or upon unenclosed premises in the city unless the animal is properly licensed, if such licensing is required by the city, and under the control of the owner by being saddled, harnessed, haltered or leashed by a substantial chain, lead rope or leash, six foot maximum, which shall be held by some competent person capable of controlling such animal.
B. To trespass upon any private property without the consent of the owner thereof, and to knowingly permit the animal to remain upon the property or to habitually continue to trespass thereon.
C. To suffer or permit such animal to habitually bark or meow or act in such a manner as to continuously disturb the peace of any citizen or to be a public nuisance.
D. To be without proper and adequate food, water, shelter, care, and attention as described in Section 597(f) of the Penal Code.
E. Subsection A of this section shall not be applicable to cats.
F. Notwithstanding any contrary provision contained in this title, dogs are not required to be leashed while located in an off-leash dog area that has been designated by the City Council. The city shall post appropriate signs and notices designating off-leash dog areas and indicating the rules and regulations applicable to such designated off-leash dog areas. Failure to comply with the posted rules and regulations shall constitute a violation of this section.
G. To walk more than three dogs at any one time or walk dogs for a fee in any public place without an annual permit from the city. The City Manager or designee shall establish the requirements and conditions for the dog walking permit program. Any dog walker failing to possess a dog walking permit shall be in violation of this section and shall be punishable. 73 600'
ON-LEASH
DOGS ONLY
OFF-LEASH
DOGS
ALLOWED TO
WAVECREST *
KELLY TO POPLAR
(Option 2)
POPLAR TO WAVECREST
MATCHLINE 1 MATCHLINE 1
NO DOGS
PERMITTED
KELLY TO POPLAR
(Option 1) MATCHLINE 1
NOTE: ON LEASH
DOGS ALLOWED IN
OFF LEASH AREA
ON-LEASH
DOGS ONLY *
ATTACHMENT 2 74