1. Coastal Trail
2. Naomi Patridge Trail
3. Eastside Parallel Trail
Question 6
• Daily
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 9
• Daily
Question 10
• Weekly
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
• Class 1 (electric motor provides assistance up to 20 MPH with pedal assist)
Question 15
• No
Question 16
• No
Question 17
• Yes
Question 18
• 15 MPH
Question 19
• None of the above – the City should allow electric motorized vehicles on all trails and focus on speed limits and hazardous operation Question 20
Personally I think that people either walking or jogging in the trails most of the time are not paying attention , they’re either on their phone or just distracted , if everyone would pay more attention and keep on their side of the trail would help tremendously
Name not available
September 6, 2022, 6:52 PM
Question 1
• Yes
Question 2
• Arleta Park
194 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 369
Question 3
N/a
Question 4
• No
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
2. Naomi Patridge Trail
3. Eastside Parallel Trail
Question 6
• Weekly
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
• Weekly
Question 9
• Weekly
Question 10
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
• Other - None
Question 15
• Yes
Question 16
• No
Question 17
• No
Question 18
• I do not support a speed limit on the trails
Question 19
• Coastal Trail
Question 20
No response
Name not available
September 6, 2022, 9:36 PM
Question 1
• No
Question 2
No response
Question 3
Miramar
Question 4
• No
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
2. Naomi Patridge Trail
3. Eastside Parallel Trail
Question 6
195 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 370
• Daily
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
• Daily
Question 9
• Daily
Question 10
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
No response
Question 15
• Yes
Question 16
• Yes
Question 17
• Yes
Question 18
• 10 MPH
Question 19
• Coastal Trail
Question 20
They are no different than a motorcycle. If all riders were responsible and used common sense it would work. But HMB sailed under that bridge years ago. I’d support class 1 (pedal assist only) but nothing more. Or widen the trails by 10-12 feet. Or like in Vancouver, make a second parallel trail for bikes. Or just restrict them. It’s not the bikes that are bad, it’s irresponsible entitled people.
Name not available
September 7, 2022, 6:04 AM
Question 1
• Yes
Question 2
• Arleta Park
Question 3
I live in HMB and my family goes back 6 generations here.
Question 4
• No
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
2. Naomi Patridge Trail
3. Eastside Parallel Trail
Question 6
• Monthly
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
• Monthly
196 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 371
Question 9
• I don't use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 10
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
No response
Question 15
• No
Question 16
• No
Question 17
• No
Question 18
• I do not support a speed limit on the trails
Question 19
• Coastal Trail
Question 20
The trail is for people to walk safely away from any motorized vehicles.
Allowing the electric motorized vehicles is then making the safety of the trail away from vehicles, a moot point. Also, most locals walk and bike to enjoy our local beauty. I feel the electric bikes and such is aimed more at tourists. The city needs to be looking at what is better for our locals, not tourists. Also what is the point of posting speed limits if they aren’t going to be enforced? They will be ignored and again, spending our money on something that is not needed.
Name not shown
September 7, 2022, 2:28 PM
Question 1
• No
Question 2
No response
Question 3
San Mateo
Question 4
• No
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
Question 6
• Other - every 3 months
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
• Monthly
Question 9
• Monthly
Question 10
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 11
197 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 372
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
• Class 1 (electric motor provides assistance up to 20 MPH with pedal assist)
Question 15
• Yes
Question 16
• Yes
Question 17
• No
Question 18
• 15 MPH
Question 19
• Coastal Trail
Question 20
I use a Class 1 ebike for commuting and road travel. I am also a hiker/walker and notice that the proliferation of mountain bikes (and especially e mountain bikes), allows bikes to go further which puts a lot of wear and tear on the trails, as well as a tendency to carve out new and wider trails. Quarry Park is a good example of how plentiful and redundant the mountain bike trails can become. Also, I am concerned with the heaviness of ebikes on a multi-use trail. Their heaviness makes them inherently more dangerous to pedestrians, especially since they can be rode at faster speeds.
Name not available
September 7, 2022, 3:09 PM
Question 1
• Yes
Question 2
• Downtown Half Moon Bay
Question 3
Half Moon Bay
Question 4
• Yes
Question 5
1. Naomi Patridge Trail
2. Coastal Trail
Question 6
• Daily
Question 7
• Commute (work, school)
Question 8
• Daily
Question 9
• Daily
Question 10
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
198 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 373
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
No response
Question 15
• Yes
Question 16
• Yes
Question 17
• Yes
Question 18
• 12 MPH
Question 19
• Coastal Trail
Question 20
No response
Name not available
September 7, 2022, 6:20 PM
Question 1
• No
Question 2
No response
Question 3
El Granada
Question 4
• No
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
2. Naomi Patridge Trail
3. Eastside Parallel Trail
Question 6
• Daily
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
• Weekly
Question 9
• Daily
Question 10
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
• Class 3 (electric motor up to 28 MPH with pedal assist) Question 15
• Yes
Question 16
• Yes
199 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 374
Question 17
• Yes
Question 18
• 15 MPH
Question 19
• None of the above – the City should allow electric motorized vehicles on all trails and focus on speed limits and hazardous operation Question 20
the trash can have speed limits. Ollie bike should be allowed as long as they follow speed limits. Many people like me bought class 3 eBikes years before there were any such restrictions. Not allowing class 3 bikes to share the trail is like saying you can only drive electric vehicles like the Nissan leaf and not better performing cars like ones like Teslas.
Name not available
September 8, 2022, 9:44 AM
Question 1
• Yes
Question 2
• Downtown Half Moon Bay
Question 3
i am a resident
Question 4
• No
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
2. Naomi Patridge Trail
3. Eastside Parallel Trail
Question 6
• Weekly
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
No response
Question 9
No response
Question 10
• Weekly
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
• Class 1 (electric motor provides assistance up to 20 MPH with pedal assist)
Question 15
• Yes
Question 16
• Yes
Question 17
• Yes
Question 18
• 15 MPH
Question 19
200 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 375
• None of the above – the City should allow electric motorized vehicles on all trails and focus on speed limits and hazardous operation Question 20
Digital signs "Your speed is...." "SLOW DOWN, don't ruin it for everybody else". I am 74, with cancer, cannot do many forms of exercise I used to do, but still trying to maintain. Prohibiting ebikes would be, for me, like prohibiting wheelchairs somewhere. Signs and co-user pressure are needed to limit the speed of irresponsible riders. Prohibition is inappropriate. Fast cars are allowed on I-280, but still limited to the rules of the road. Should be the same with the coastside trails. It is a matter of access for some of us, and periodic enforcement for all of us.
Name not available
September 8, 2022, 10:24 AM
Question 1
• No
Question 2
No response
Question 3
San Ramon
Question 4
• No
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
2. Naomi Patridge Trail
Question 6
• Monthly
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
• Monthly
Question 9
• Monthly
Question 10
• Monthly
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
• Class 1 (electric motor provides assistance up to 20 MPH with pedal assist)
Question 15
• Yes
Question 16
• No
Question 17
• No
Question 18
• I do not support a speed limit on the trails
Question 19
• None of the above – the City should allow electric motorized vehicles on all trails and focus on speed limits and hazardous operation Question 20
No response
201 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 376
Name not available
September 8, 2022, 10:29 AM
Question 1
• Yes
Question 2
• Ocean Colony
Question 3
HMB resident
Question 4
• Yes
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
2. Naomi Patridge Trail
3. Eastside Parallel Trail
Question 6
• Weekly
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
• Daily
Question 9
• I don't use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 10
• Daily
Question 11
• Daily
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• Daily
Question 14
• Class 3 (electric motor up to 28 MPH with pedal assist) Question 15
• Yes
Question 16
• No
Question 17
• Yes
Question 18
• 15 MPH
Question 19
• None of the above – the City should allow electric motorized vehicles on all trails and focus on speed limits and hazardous operation Question 20
Ebikes are an essential mode of transportation for some people especially older resident who would otherwise sit indoors.
Name not available
September 8, 2022, 11:07 AM
Question 1
• Yes
Question 2
• Downtown Half Moon Bay
Question 3
Downtown
202 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 377
Question 4
• No
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
2. Eastside Parallel Trail
3. Naomi Patridge Trail
Question 6
• Monthly
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 9
• Monthly
Question 10
• Monthly
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
• Class 3 (electric motor up to 28 MPH with pedal assist) Question 15
• No
Question 16
• No
Question 17
• No
Question 18
• 15 MPH
Question 19
• None of the above – the City should allow electric motorized vehicles on all trails and focus on speed limits and hazardous operation Question 20
No response
Name not available
September 8, 2022, 2:15 PM
Question 1
• No
Question 2
No response
Question 3
Palo alto
Question 4
• No
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
Question 6
• Weekly
Question 7
203 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 378
• Recreation
Question 8
• Weekly
Question 9
• I don't use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 10
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
No response
Question 15
• Yes
Question 16
• Yes
Question 17
• Yes
Question 18
• 10 MPH
Question 19
• Coastal Trail
Question 20
The trail is getting more and more crowded especially for the older walkers.bicyclesare ok but even with speed limitations electric bikes come up to fast and no conducive to a leisurely walk
Name not available
September 8, 2022, 4:11 PM
Question 1
• Yes
Question 2
• Alsace Lorraine
Question 3
Half Moon Bay
Question 4
• No
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
2. Naomi Patridge Trail
3. Eastside Parallel Trail
Question 6
• Daily
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
• Daily
Question 9
• Weekly
Question 10
204 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 379
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
No response
Question 15
• Yes
Question 16
• Yes
Question 17
• Yes
Question 18
• 10 MPH
Question 19
• Coastal Trail
Question 20
I find the electronic vehicles dangerous. I would ban them Anthony Applewhite
September 8, 2022, 8:38 PM
Question 1
• Yes
Question 2
• Miramar
Question 3
I am a resident
Question 4
• No
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
2. Naomi Patridge Trail
3. Eastside Parallel Trail
Question 6
• Daily
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
• Daily
Question 9
• Daily
Question 10
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
205 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 380
No response
Question 15
• Yes
Question 16
• Yes
Question 17
• Yes
Question 18
• 12 MPH
Question 19
• Coastal Trail
Question 20
E-bikes are not the issue. Courtesy and civility is the issue. Those that want to ride fast should do so, but NOT on a coastal trail that is shared with pedestrians. In additional all bikes should alert pedestrians, preferably with a bell, well before passing them.ain
Name not available
September 8, 2022, 10:30 PM
Question 1
• Yes
Question 2
• Frenchman’s Creek
Question 3
HMB
Question 4
• Yes
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
2. Naomi Patridge Trail
3. Eastside Parallel Trail
Question 6
• Daily
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
• Daily
Question 9
• Daily
Question 10
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 11
• Weekly
Question 12
• Daily
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
No response
Question 15
• No
Question 16
• No
Question 17
206 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 381
• No
Question 18
• I do not support a speed limit on the trails
Question 19
• None of the above – the City should allow electric motorized vehicles on all trails and focus on speed limits and hazardous operation Question 20
No response
Name not available
September 9, 2022, 10:29 AM
Question 1
• No
Question 2
No response
Question 3
Miramar
Question 4
• No
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
2. Eastside Parallel Trail
3. Naomi Patridge Trail
Question 6
• Daily
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
• Daily
Question 9
• Monthly
Question 10
• Monthly
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
• Class 2 (includes a throttle to go up to 20 MPH without pedal assist) Question 15
• Yes
Question 16
• Yes
Question 17
• Yes
Question 18
• 12 MPH
Question 19
• None of the above – the City should allow electric motorized vehicles on all trails and focus on speed limits and hazardous operation Question 20
No response
207 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 382
Name not available
September 9, 2022, 12:04 PM
Question 1
• No
Question 2
No response
Question 3
Colorado Spring, CO
Question 4
• No
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
Question 6
• Daily
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
• Daily
Question 9
• Daily
Question 10
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
No response
Question 15
• Yes
Question 16
• No
Question 17
• No
Question 18
• I do not support a speed limit on the trails
Question 19
• None of the above – the City should allow electric motorized vehicles on all trails and focus on speed limits and hazardous operation Question 20
No response
Name not available
September 10, 2022, 11:26 AM
Question 1
• Yes
Question 2
• Arleta Park
Question 3
Hmb
Question 4
208 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 383
• Yes
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
2. Naomi Patridge Trail
3. Eastside Parallel Trail
Question 6
• Daily
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
• Weekly
Question 9
• Weekly
Question 10
• Daily
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
• Class 2 (includes a throttle to go up to 20 MPH without pedal assist) Question 15
• No
Question 16
• No
Question 17
• Yes
Question 18
• 15 MPH
Question 19
• None of the above – the City should allow electric motorized vehicles on all trails and focus on speed limits and hazardous operation Question 20
The type of vehicle should not be of consequence it's what you do with the vehicle for example speeding
Name not available
September 12, 2022, 10:17 AM
Question 1
• No
Question 2
No response
Question 3
Belmont, CA
Question 4
• No
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
2. Naomi Patridge Trail
3. Eastside Parallel Trail
Question 6
• Other - 4 times yearly
209 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 384
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
• Daily
Question 9
• I don't use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 10
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
No response
Question 15
• Yes
Question 16
• Yes
Question 17
• Yes
Question 18
• 10 MPH
Question 19
• Coastal Trail
Question 20
ALL trails need bike speed limits, ALL need e-bike restrictions. ONLY Class 1 - trails are for exercize and nature, not speed.
Name not available
September 12, 2022, 6:01 PM
Question 1
• Yes
Question 2
• Alsace Lorraine
Question 3
Half MoonBay
Question 4
• No
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
Question 6
• Daily
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
• Daily
Question 9
• I don't use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 10
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 11
210 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 385
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
No response
Question 15
• Yes
Question 16
• Yes
Question 17
• Yes
Question 18
• 10 MPH
Question 19
• Coastal Trail
Question 20
No response
Name not available
September 13, 2022, 2:54 PM
Question 1
• No
Question 2
No response
Question 3
San Francisco
Question 4
• Yes
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
2. Naomi Patridge Trail
3. Eastside Parallel Trail
Question 6
• Other - 4 times week
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
• Weekly
Question 9
• I don't use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 10
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
No response
Question 15
211 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 386
• Yes
Question 16
• Yes
Question 17
• Yes
Question 18
• 10 MPH
Question 19
• Coastal Trail
Question 20
Do not support the use of these
Name not available
September 13, 2022, 3:19 PM
Question 1
• Yes
Question 2
• Downtown Half Moon Bay
Question 3
N/A
Question 4
• Yes
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
2. Naomi Patridge Trail
Question 6
• Daily
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
• Weekly
Question 9
• Daily
Question 10
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
No response
Question 15
• No
Question 16
• Yes
Question 17
• Yes
Question 18
• 10 MPH
Question 19
212 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 387
• None of the above – the City should allow electric motorized vehicles on all trails and focus on speed limits and hazardous operation Question 20
When I walk electrics bikes go to a high speed that can cause severe accidents
Matt Oja
September 13, 2022, 3:48 PM
Question 1
• Yes
Question 2
• Arleta Park
Question 3
Mars
Question 4
• No
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
2. Naomi Patridge Trail
3. Eastside Parallel Trail
Question 6
• Weekly
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
• Weekly
Question 9
• I don't use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 10
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
No response
Question 15
• Yes
Question 16
• Yes
Question 17
• Yes
Question 18
• 15 MPH
Question 19
• None of the above – the City should allow electric motorized vehicles on all trails and focus on speed limits and hazardous operation Question 20
Bike trails will be very important for the last mile problem after the SkyTrain gondola system is finished!
Name not available
September 13, 2022, 6:59 PM
Question 1
213 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 388
• No
Question 2
No response
Question 3
Montara
Question 4
• No
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
2. Naomi Patridge Trail
3. Eastside Parallel Trail
Question 6
• Weekly
Question 7
• Errands (shopping, dining, etc.)
Question 8
• Daily
Question 9
• Weekly
Question 10
• Weekly
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
• Class 2 (includes a throttle to go up to 20 MPH without pedal assist) Question 15
• No
Question 16
• Yes
Question 17
• Yes
Question 18
• 12 MPH
Question 19
• Coastal Trail
Question 20
No response
Name not available
September 13, 2022, 9:20 PM
Question 1
• No
Question 2
No response
Question 3
Montara
Question 4
• No
214 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 389
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
2. Naomi Patridge Trail
3. Eastside Parallel Trail
Question 6
• Weekly
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
• Weekly
Question 9
• I don't use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 10
• Monthly
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
• Class 1 (electric motor provides assistance up to 20 MPH with pedal assist)
Question 15
• Yes
Question 16
• No
Question 17
• Yes
Question 18
• 15 MPH
Question 19
• None of the above – the City should allow electric motorized vehicles on all trails and focus on speed limits and hazardous operation Question 20
No response
Name not available
September 14, 2022, 11:07 AM
Question 1
• No
Question 2
No response
Question 3
San Mateo County
Question 4
• No
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
2. Naomi Patridge Trail
3. Eastside Parallel Trail
Question 6
• Monthly
Question 7
• Recreation
215 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 390
Question 8
• Monthly
Question 9
• I don't use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 10
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
• Class 3 (electric motor up to 28 MPH with pedal assist) Question 15
• Yes
Question 16
• Yes
Question 17
• Yes
Question 18
• 10 MPH
Question 19
• Coastal Trail
Question 20
ebikes should not be allowed on natural surface trails
Name not available
September 14, 2022, 3:31 PM
Question 1
• Yes
Question 2
• Arleta Park
Question 3
I am a resident
Question 4
• Yes
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
Question 6
• Daily
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
• Daily
Question 9
No response
Question 10
• Weekly
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
216 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 391
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
• Class 3 (electric motor up to 28 MPH with pedal assist) Question 15
• Yes
Question 16
• Yes
Question 17
• Yes
Question 18
• 12 MPH
Question 19
• None of the above – the City should allow electric motorized vehicles on all trails and focus on speed limits and hazardous operation Question 20
Electric bikes allows more of us to lead healthy lives despite handicaps like injuries, arthritis, etc. The bikes are not the issue. Speed can be an issues no matter what bike you have. Limit the speed not the type of bike please.
Name not available
September 14, 2022, 3:38 PM
Question 1
• Yes
Question 2
• Arleta Park
Question 3
I am a HMB resident
Question 4
• Yes
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
Question 6
• Daily
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
• Daily
Question 9
• Weekly
Question 10
• Weekly
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
• Class 3 (electric motor up to 28 MPH with pedal assist) Question 15
• Yes
Question 16
• Yes
217 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 392
Question 17
• Yes
Question 18
• 15 MPH
Question 19
• None of the above – the City should allow electric motorized vehicles on all trails and focus on speed limits and hazardous operation Question 20
Set a speed limit. A couple of reasons: 1 - e-Bike classes are confusing, avoid the whole "what class bike is that" by setting a speed limit for all. 2) Push/pedal bikes fly thru there too at some high speed. Make a safe speed limit universal for all.
Name not shown
September 15, 2022, 8:09 AM
Question 1
• No
Question 2
No response
Question 3
El Granada
Question 4
• No
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
2. Naomi Patridge Trail
3. Eastside Parallel Trail
Question 6
• Weekly
Question 7
• Errands (shopping, dining, etc.)
Question 8
• Weekly
Question 9
• Weekly
Question 10
• Weekly
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
• Class 1 (electric motor provides assistance up to 20 MPH with pedal assist)
Question 15
• Yes
Question 16
• Yes
Question 17
• Yes
Question 18
• 15 MPH
Question 19
218 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 393
• None of the above – the City should allow electric motorized vehicles on all trails and focus on speed limits and hazardous operation Question 20
No response
Name not available
September 15, 2022, 10:12 AM
Question 1
• Yes
Question 2
• Miramar
Question 3
HMB
Question 4
• No
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
2. Naomi Patridge Trail
3. Eastside Parallel Trail
Question 6
• Weekly
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
• Weekly
Question 9
• I don't use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 10
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
No response
Question 15
• Yes
Question 16
• Yes
Question 17
• Yes
Question 18
• 10 MPH
Question 19
• Coastal Trail
Question 20
Just yesterday we encountered people on ebikes in the bird sanctuary just south of the coastal trail and they continued into the undeveloped area. They were off trail and the constant Humm of their motors was definately not what I would think of as compatible with a "nature" experience. Any access to ebikes on the Coastal trail will encourage this kind of abuse of the rules and be impossible to walk back once people belive it is OK. Not only will this increase encroachment on the sanctuary but reduce the natural experiences of the coast for walkers. As the ebikers were speeding through the sanctuary they also made walking on the trail more hazardous. We are an older couple who walk and bike and ebike access would discourage us using these trails in the future. Please 219 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 394
do not allow this. Keep our few natural spots, natural. Thank you.
Name not available
September 15, 2022, 7:41 PM
Question 1
• Yes
Question 2
• Arleta Park
Question 3
Resident
Question 4
• Yes
Question 5
1. Coastal Trail
2. Naomi Patridge Trail
3. Eastside Parallel Trail
Question 6
• Daily
Question 7
• Recreation
Question 8
• Daily
Question 9
• I don't use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 10
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 11
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 12
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 13
• I don’t use this mode of transportation on trails
Question 14
No response
Question 15
• Yes
Question 16
• Yes
Question 17
• Yes
Question 18
• 10 MPH
Question 19
• Coastal Trail
Question 20
Recent e-bike models can be as large or larger than motorcycles. Their size and speed is intimidating. Their width can take up most of the trail where it narrows. These have big tires which are a danger to wildlife (bunnies, snakes, lizards, birds) and walkers alike. Please restrict size and speed for our safety.
220 | www.opentownhall.com/12076 Created with OpenGov | September 19, 2022, 9:36 AM ebike Survey
Please provide your feedback on the use of electric motorized vehicles (e.g. e-bikes, scooters, skateboards) on the Coastal Trail, Naomi Patridge Trail, and Eastside Parallel Trail. 395
BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY
AGENDA REPORT
For meeting of: April 4, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
VIA: Matthew Chidester, City Manager
FROM: Lisa Lopez Rossi, Interim Assistant City Manager
Kenneth Stiles, Finance Manager
TITLE: MID-YEAR REVIEW AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the attached Resolution to amend the FY 2022-23 Operating and Capital budget.
FISCAL IMPACT:
If adopted, General Fund revenues will be amended to $23,075,847, an increase of $1,778,826, and General Fund expenditures is amended to $23,697,444, an increase of $231,600 over the Adopted FY 2022-23 budget. In addition, the total revenue of Non-General Funds will be amended to $22,806,594 and Non-General Expenditures amended to $33,308,404.
STRATEGIC ELEMENT:
This recommendation supports the Fiscal Sustainability and Inclusive Governance Elements of the Strategic Plan.
BACKGROUND:
Finance staff completed a Mid-Year Budget Analysis and is proposing adjustments to the FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget.
The City’s departments reviewed their budgets and projections at mid-year in order to request amendments if needed. The City Manager and Finance staff met with each department to discuss and finalize the Revised FY 2022-23 Budget recommendations.
Year-end estimates in operating expenditures in excess of the adopted budget by 5% and $10,000 are considered material in nature and are proposed for a budget adjustment.
Revenue adjustments are described in the body of this staff report and an itemized version is 396
attached (Attachment #3). The estimates in the Mid-Year Financial Analysis will be revisited in the development of the FY 2023-24 budget and significant and material changes will be presented as part of the annual financial presentation.
DISCUSSION:
This Fiscal Year 2022-23 Mid-year Budget report will focus on the following key objectives:
1. Updating Council on the status of revenues and expenditures within the FY 2022-23 General Fund Revised Budget and requesting appropriation adjustments to the FY 2022- 23 General Fund totaling $231,600. This includes $87,600 previously approved by Council.
2. Updating Council on the status of revenues and expenditures within the FY 2022-23 NonGeneral Fund Revised Budget and requesting appropriation adjustments to the FY 2022-23 (Other) Funds.
3. Updating Council on the projected fund balance structure through June 30, 2023.
4. Preparing for the FY 2023-24 Budget Process.
The FY 2022-23 Annual Operating and Capital Budget was adopted as a conservative budget considering the recovery of City’s most vulnerable revenue source, Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT). After completion of the mid-year analysis, staff is pleased to report that revenues are performing better than initially planned. The FY 2022-23 Revised General Fund budget is $23 million in revenue and $19.6 million in operating expenditures and capital transfers of $4 million.
Previously Approved Changes to the FY 2022-23 Budget
At every Council meeting, staff brings agenda items for Council’s consideration and approval which may require amendments to the original budget. Council has previously approved adjustments with a fiscal net impact of $1,327,600 for all funds. During the mid-year budget review process, Finance staff incorporated all previously approved budget items (year-to-date) into the Revised Budget. Full detail can be found on Attachment #2.
1. Status of General Fund Revenues and Expenditures in FY 2022-23 Revised Budget FY 2022-23 General Fund Revenues
The General Fund is the City’s primary operating fund and is used to account for most day-to-day activities. It receives unrestricted revenues and provides the City’s general administrative services, law enforcement, public works, and community development related activities such as planning, building, and engineering. Revenue sources include but are not limited to transient occupancy tax (TOT), sales tax, property tax, business registration, and current fees for services.
The Revised estimates for General Fund revenues are projected to be $23,075,847 or $1,778,826 (8%) higher than the Adopted Budget of $21,297,021. The following table illustrates the FY 2022- 23 adopted and revised budget recommendations.
397
General Fund Revenues Adopted
Budget
Mid-Year
Proposal Revised % Change
Transient Occupancy Tax 8,752,000 851,028 9,603,028 10% Property Taxes 3,436,620 451,430 3,888,050 13%
Sales & Use Taxes 3,058,600 338,000 3,396,600 11%
Other Revenues 5,525,621 138,368 5,663,989 3%
Transfers In 524,180 - 524,180 0%
Total 21,297,021 1,778,826 23,075,847 8%
General Fund Revenues Adjustments for Council Approval
The following revenues are projected to reflect material changes over the FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget, and recommended for budget adjustment:
• Transient Occupancy Tax As of December 31, 2022, the City received $3.9 million or 45% of budget. Comparatively, the City received 35% in the prior year on December 31st, suggesting an overperformance. The City now estimates revenues will be $9.6 million, an adjustment of $851,000. This number assumes occupancy rates will dip in the January and February months due to the storms, but hotels will rebound in the remaining March to June months. Staff still considers this a conservative estimate. • Property Taxes On December 31, 2022, the City received $1.9 million or 56% of budget.
Considering property taxes are mostly received in two equal payments in December and April, this revenue stream is slightly overperforming. Staff is requesting an adjustment of $451,000.
• Sales & Use Tax The City is tracking slightly better with sales tax. As seen in the 2nd Quarter financial report, the City has received 37% of budget compared to the prior year’s 32%.
Additionally, after meeting with the City’s sales tax consultant, staff is requesting an adjustment to this line-item of $338,000.
• Other Revenues This category includes revenues such as business license, golf facilities fees, parking fees, and additional one-time ARPA funds. Some line-items are requesting to be increased while others to be decreased (Attachment #3). In total, the City estimates it will receive $5.6 million, which is a $138,000 or 3% increase from the adopted budget. 398
FY 2022-23 General Fund Expenditures
Expenditure projections were reviewed based on two categories: personnel costs and general government program budget, as described below. Personnel cost projections are based on the most current payroll cost and calculated for the remainder of the fiscal year.
Staff Initiated Adjustments to Budget
During the mid-year budget review process, staff makes several minor cleanup changes and adjustments within the department’s budgets. Money is moved from various individual lineitems with savings to other line items within a department budget. This is done when a line item may go over its original budget amount.
These changes are considered routine and have minimal effects on the overall General Fund and Non-General Fund budgets and remain within the Council approved funding levels of the FY 2022-23 Annual Operating Budget.
General Fund Expenditure Appropriation Adjustments for Council Consideration Actions Request
Operating Expenditures for City Manager’s Office 65,000 Operating Expenditures for Public Works 79,000
General Fund Expenditure Adjustments 144,000
• Operating Expenditures for City’s Manager Office
In the City Attorney Division, staff is requesting an additional $65,000. In addition to an increase in general matters related work, the City is anticipating more funds will be needed to support legal counsel for specific projects. These projects include Smith Field, the Housing element, and Poplar Complete Street Project.
• Operating Expenditures for Public Works
In the Maintenance/Facilities division, the City received an unexpected one-time large electricity charge. This was for services provided in multiple prior periods that were under review by the vendor. The adjustment of $79,000 is to cover that charge. 399
2. Status of Non-General Fund Revenues and Expenditures in FY 2022-23 Revised Budget Non-General Funds include the following categories:
• Special Revenue and Capital Funds, including Storm Drain, Main Street Bridge, Gas Tax, Streets and Roads, Measure A & W, Traffic Mitigation, Library Operating and Capital, Parks Development, Affordable Housing, Citizens’ Option for Public Safety (COPS) Grant, Public Facilities, General Capital and Land Assets funds • Enterprise Funds, including Sewer Operating and Capital funds, and • Internal Service Funds, including Vehicle and Equipment Replacement, Risk Management, and Pension Stabilization funds.
Non-General Fund FY 2022-23 Revenues and Transfers
The revised estimates for all other fund revenues are projected to be $23,806,594 or $1,534,147 (7%) higher than the Adopted Budget of $22,272,447. Full detail on itemized revenue changes can be found on Attachment #3.
Non-General Fund Revenues Adjustments for Council Approval Adjustments
Other Funds Adopted
Budget
Previously
Approved
Mid-Year
Proposal
Total
Adjustment
Revised
Budget
%
Change
Enterprise Funds 5,241,360 - 688,879 688,879 5,930,239 13% Special Revenue & Capital 7,080,000 500,000 107,600 607,600 7,687,600 9% Internal Service 41,600 - 19,041 19,041 60,641 46%
Transfers In (various funds) 9,909,487 240,000 (21,373) 218,627 10,128,114 2% Total 22,272,447 740,000 794,147 1,534,147 23,806,594 7% • Enterprise Funds During budget adoption back in June 2022, staff estimated sewer rate charges for the fiscal year. After the completion of the final sewer rate charges in July 2022, staff is requesting an adjustment to incorporate the final amount. Additionally, the City is anticipating slightly more impact fees. Staff is requesting an additional $688,000 adjustment.
• Special Revenue & Capital Funds Staff is requesting an additional $107,000 adjustment to these funds. This is primarily from adjustments to Measure A, Measure W and Park Facility Impact Fees.
• Internal Service Funds Due to rising interest rates, staff is anticipating slightly more interest to be received during the fiscal year. An adjustment of $19,000 is recommended. 400
Non-General Fund FY 2022-23 Expenditures and Transfers
Non-General Fund expenditures comprise $30,871,615 of the City’s $54,337,459 total adopted expenditure budget. These expenditures are proposed to be amended by an increase of $2,436,789 to $33,308,404 which includes $1,980,000 previously approved by Council and an adjustment of $456,789 which is outlined below.
Non-General Fund Expenditure Appropriation Adjustments for Council Consideration CIP / ITEM Adopted Mid-Year
Request
Revised
Budget
NEW - Emergency Myrtle Outfall Repair - 150,000 150,000 NEW - Safety Element - 80,000 80,000
0759 - Main St Bridge Project - 15,000 15,000
0523 - Highway 1 Safety - South - 20,000 20,000
0605 - Sheriff Substation Renovation - 14,021 14,021
9022 - Pilarcitos Creek Restoration A 342,000 (60,000) 282,000 9023 - Corporate Yard Improvements 2,964,619 259,141 3,223,760 Transfer from Main Street to Public Facilities 489,300 (21,373) 467,927 Non-General Fund Expenditure Adjustment 456,789
• Emergency Myrtle Outfall Repair (New) During the early storms and continuing rain, the stormwater outfall along the coastal trail adjacent to Myrtle Street was damaged and has started to erode and damaging portions of the trail. Public Works is working on an emergency project to repair the outfall and pipe segments and the backfill the erosion with temporary rock stabilization to preserve coastal access and public safety. • Safety Element (New) The Safety Element is a mandatory General Plan Element which the City is obligated to complete. The Element is supportive and foundational to emergency preparation, emergency response, and hazard mitigation efforts Citywide. The City entered into an agreement with the County of San Mateo under a collaborative project model along with six other jurisdictions to support such efforts.
• Transfer from Main Street Bridge Fund to Public Facilities Fund As residual spending continues in the Main Street Fund to close out the project, staff is recommending an adjustment to the transfer amount that will clear and close the fund at end of the year. 401
3. Projected Fund Balance Structure
Should the Council approve the recommendations listed above, the ending General Fund balance as of June 30, 2023, is projected to be approximately $14,963,556 which includes $9.8 million in reserves and $5.1 million unassigned.
The projected fund balance for the General Fund is shown below:
The FY 2022-23 revised budget amounts have been updated from the adopted budget figures following the independent audit of FY 2021-22. Although $5.1 million is left to be assigned, staff recommends assigning funds formally in the FY 2023-24 budget process, due to current and ongoing economic uncertainty.
4. Preparing for the FY 2023-24 Budget Process
In March 2023, the Finance staff will issue budget instructions for the FY 2023-24 Budget to all departments. Finance staff is now working closely with the City Manager and all departments to develop budget factors and assumptions that will be used to prepare the FY 2023-24 Budget.
Each department will be provided their Base Budget expenditure allotments consistent with the FY 2022-23 revised budget at the current service levels, adjusted by known personnel salary and benefit increases, as well as known or estimated inflationary increases for most operational expenses. Each department will be given an opportunity to submit prioritized program changes for service level enhancements or reductions to the base budget consistent with the Council’s vision for the FY 2023-24 service priorities.
The goal of this budget process is to develop the City’s budget by completing a full analysis of the City’s current service level to identify necessary and desirable service increase and/or reduction options, which when combined, will reach a balanced and sustainable budget. To Adopted Budget
2022-23
Revised Budget
FY 2022-23
Beginning Fund Balance $ 15,585,153 $ 15,585,153
Total Revenues 21,297,021 23,075,847
Expenditures
Operating Expenditures 19,450,425 19,682,025
Capital Transfers 4,015,419 4,015,419
Total Expenditures 23,465,844 23,697,444
Ending Fund Balance 13,416,330 14,963,556
Reserves (Operating & Economic) 9,725,212 9,841,012
Unassigned Fund Balance 3,691,118 5,122,544
Reserves as a % of operating exp. 50% 50%
GENERAL FUND: FUND BALANCES
402
this end, the City Manager will formulate a packaged budget recommendation of service enhancements and/or reductions for Council to consider. The staff recommendations will be based on several factors, including the Council’s FY 2023-24 priorities, the City’s strategic plan, staffing capacity and potential impact to the overall City operation and services provided to the community.
With the adoption of the mid-year budget review, staff will begin working on the FY 2023-24 budget which will allow for the completion of the budget and its adoption in June.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution authorizing adjustments to the FY 2022-23 Operating and Capital Budget
2. FY 2022-23 City Council Previously Approved Budget Items
3. FY 2022-23 Itemized Revenues & Expenditure Adjustments
4. FY 2022-23 Summaries of Revenues, Expenditures and Fund Balances By Fund 403
RESOLUTION NO. C-2023-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY APPROVING ADJUSTMENTS TO THE FY 2022-23 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Annual Operating and Capital Budget on June 21, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Mid-Year Budget analysis and requested adjustments; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend an appropriations limit, pursuant to California Constitution Article XII B, for fiscal year 2022-23 to $57,005,848; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Half Moon Bay hereby approves the budget adjustments needed for the City-wide revenues and expenditures to be as follows:
Revenue Expenditures
GENERAL FUND 23,075,847 23,697,444
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Sewer Operating 8,677,200 7,199,706
Sewer Capital 259,001 3,861,465
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Storm Drain Operating 2,500 -
Traffic Mitigation 113,983 35,888
Library Operation 100 -
Main Street Bridge - 482,927
Gas Tax 507,983 66,432
Streets and Roads 152,709 1,236,855
Measures A 385,643 68,585
Park/Facilities Development 5,139,424 7,633,900
Affordable Housing 27,184 1,000,000
Public Facilities 2,997,246 3,619,781
Police Grants 178,029 200,000
Measure W 201,276 -
Lot Retirement/Acquisition 18,800 430,000
CZI Grant 500,000 500,000
Capital General 1,790,069 3,056,900
Drainage Capital 392,500 1,217,159
Library Capital 3,500 -
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
Vehicle Replacement 56,167 44,067
Equipment Replacement 548,981 545,481
Risk Management 698,204 957,163
Pension Stabilization 1,156,095 1,152,095
46,882,441 57,005,848
Mid-Year Budget
404
******************************************************* I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly passed and adopted on the 4th day of April 2023 by the City Council of the City of Half Moon Bay by the following vote:
AYES, Councilmembers:
NOES, Councilmembers:
ABSENT, Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
Jessica Blair, City Clerk Deborah Penrose, Mayor
405
Fund Description Council Date Revenue Expenditure
134 CZI Grant Awarded 9/6/2022 400,000
134 Matching Expenditures for CZI Grant 9/6/2022 400,000 151 Smith Field Improvement Project 9/20/2022 190,000
151 Wavecrest [CIP] 9/20/2022 50,000
151 Transfer from Special Funds for CIP Projects 9/20/2022 240,000 125 Transfer to Fund Smith Field and Wavecrest 9/20/2022 240,000 134 Additional CZI Grant Awarded 10/4/2022 100,000
134 Matching Expenditures for CZI Grant 10/4/2022 100,000 101 Agreement for User Fee & Cost Recovery Study 2/21/2023 87,600 126 Predevelopment loan for 555 Kelly 2/21/2023 1,000,000 740,000 2,067,600
NET IMPACT (1,327,600)
FISCAL IMPACT
City of Half Moon Bay
FY 2022‐23 Revised Budget
Previously Approved Budget Items
406
Approved
Budget
Actuals on
12/31 Ending Est.
Increase /
(Decrease)
General Fund Revenues
Transient Occupancy Tax 8,752,000 3,961,966 9,603,028 851,028 Property Taxes 3,131,000 1,901,536 3,573,037 442,037 Sales & Use Tax 3,029,000 1,115,516 3,367,000 338,000 Franchise Tax 500,000 143,020 688,536 188,536 Golf Facilities Fees 550,000 295,322 622,090 72,090 Property Tax ‐ ERAF 150,000 ‐ 211,157 61,157 Interest 88,071 48,581 127,428 39,357 Franchise Tax 336,800 40,149 355,046 18,246 Business License Tax 301,000 257,041 312,243 11,243 Alarm Fees 5,300 11,050 16,350 11,050 Fines & Forfeitures 76,428 17,372 27,936 (48,492) Property Transfer Tax 152,000 29,433 100,237 (51,763) Poplar Beach Parking Fees 379,158 100,219 225,495 (153,664) General Fund Revenue Adjustment 1,778,826
Approved
Budget
Actuals on
12/31 Ending Est.
Increase /
(Decrease)
Other Funds
[Fund 201] ‐ Sewer Service Charges 5,027,544 2,963,326 5,671,238 643,694 [Fund 132] ‐ Measure W ‐ Sales Tax 152,900 62,361 199,376 46,476 [Fund 125] ‐ Park Facility Developme 60,000 96,324 100,000 40,000 [Fund 202] ‐ Sewer Connection Fees 154,616 181,334 185,000 30,384 [Fund 128] ‐ Cops Distribution‐Sm Co 158,500 116,923 173,729 15,229 [Fund 122] ‐ Gas Tax 304,700 135,882 264,683 (40,017) [Fund 124] ‐ Sales Tax ‐ Measure A 423,300 219,614 369,941 (53,359) [Mutiple Funds] ‐ Interest 237,300 107,491 370,412 133,112 Other Funds Revenue Adjustment 815,520
Approved
Budget
Actuals on
12/31 Ending Est.
Increase /
(Decrease)
Fund Transfers
Transfers into Park Facilities from Main Street Bridge ‐ 2,308,919 2,287,546 (21,373) Total Revenue Adjustments 2,572,973
City of Half Moon Bay
FY 2022 ‐23 Revised Budget
Proposed Revenue Adjustments
407
Approved
Budget
Actuals on
12/31 Ending Est.
Increase /
(Decrease)
General Fund Expenditures
[City's Manager Office] City Attorney 404,250 106,145 469,250 65,000 [Public Works] Facilities/Maintenance 2,103,136 949,551 2,182,136 79,000 General Fund Expenditure Adjustment 144,000
Approved
Budget
Actuals on
12/31 Ending Est.
Increase /
(Decrease)
Other Funds
[CIP #0759] Main St Bridge Project ‐ 7,476 15,000 15,000 [CIP #0523] Hghwy 1 Saftey ‐ South ‐ 11,446 20,000 20,000 [CIP #0605] Sheriff Substation Renovation ‐ 14,021 14,021 14,021 [CIP #9022] Pilarcitos Creek Restoration A 342,000 ‐ 282,000 (60,000) [CIP #9023] Corporate Yard Improvements 2,964,619 1,197,461 3,223,760 259,141 [CIP #TBD1] Emergency Myrtle Outfall Repair ‐ ‐ 150,000 150,000 [CIP #TBD2] Safety Element ‐ ‐ 80,000 80,000 Other Funds Expenditure Adjustment 478,162
Approved
Budget
Actuals on
12/31 Ending Est.
Increase /
(Decrease)
Fund Transfers
Transfers out Main Street Bridge to Park Facilities 489,300 ‐ 467,927 (21,373) Total Expenditure Adjustments 600,789
City of Half Moon Bay
FY 2022 ‐23 Revised Budget
Proposed Expenditure Adjustments
408
Actual Adopted Previously Mid‐Year Revised % Change over Fund Name 2021‐22 2022‐23 Approved Adjustments 2022‐23 Adopted GENERAL FUND 24,534,741 $ $ ‐ 21,297,021 $ $ 1,778,826 $ 23,075,847 8.4%
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Sewer Operating $ 6,685,879 ‐ 8,033,506 643,694 8,677,200 8.0% Sewer Capital 3,803 $ ‐ 213,816 45,185 259,001 21.1% TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS 6,689,682 ‐ 8,247,322 688,879 8,936,201 8.4%
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Storm Drain Operating (7,862) ‐ 2,500 ‐ 2,500 0.0% Traffic Mitigation (8,030) ‐ 90,500 23,483 113,983 25.9% Library Operation (371) ‐ 100 ‐ 100 0.0% Main Street Bridge ‐ 126,930 ‐ ‐ ‐ Gas Tax 519,605 ‐ 548,000 (40,017) ‐ 507,983 7.3% Streets and Roads 2,586,701 ‐ 131,200 21,509 152,709 16.4% Measures A 363,190 ‐ 428,500 (42,857) ‐ 385,643 10.0% Park/Facilities Development 1,518,910 ‐ 5,078,400 61,024 5,139,424 1.2% Affordable Housing (48,691) ‐ 15,300 11,884 27,184 77.7% Public Facilities 929,765 ‐ 3,018,619 (21,373) ‐ 2,997,246 0.7% Police Grants 146,028 ‐ 162,800 15,229 178,029 9.4% Measure W 468,198 ‐ 154,800 46,476 201,276 30.0% Lot Retirement/Acquisition (50,840) ‐ 18,800 ‐ 18,800 0.0% CZI Grant ‐ ‐ ‐ 500,000 500,000 Capital General 523,238 1,539,200 240,000 10,869 1,790,069 16.3% Drainage Capital 4,869 ‐ 392,500 ‐ 392,500 0.0% Library Capital (5,426) ‐ 3,500 ‐ 3,500 0.0% 7,066,213 11,584,719 740,000 86,228 12,410,947 Vehicle Replacement 212,131 ‐ 56,167 ‐ 56,167 0.0% Equipment Replacement 501,704 ‐ 548,981 ‐ 548,981 0.0% Risk Management 552,793 ‐ 679,163 19,041 698,204 2.8% Pension Stabilization 1,015,903 ‐ 1,156,095 ‐ 1,156,095 0.0% INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 2,282,530 ‐ 2,440,406 19,041 2,459,447 0.8% Judgement Bonds ‐ B ‐ (180) ‐ ‐ ‐ DEBT SERVICE FUNDS (180) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 16,038,245 22,272,447 740,000 794,147 23,806,594 6.9% Total All Funds 40,572,986 $ $ 43,569,468 $ 740,000 $ 2,572,973 $ 46,882,441 8% Total Other Funds
TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE AND
City of Half Moon Bay
FY 2022‐23 Revised Budget
Summary of Revenue & Transfers by Fund
Budget Adjustments
409
Actual Adopted Previously Mid‐Year Revised % Change over Fund Name 2021‐22 2022‐23 Approved Adjustments 2022‐23 Adopted GENERAL FUND 20,090,288 $ $ 23,465,844 $ 87,600 $ 144,000 $ 23,697,444 1.0%
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Sewer Operating 6,695,652 ‐ 7,199,706 ‐ 7,199,706 0.0% Sewer Capital 2,027,236 ‐ 3,861,465 ‐ 3,861,465 0.0% TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS 8,722,888 ‐ 11,061,171 ‐ 11,061,171 0.0%
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Storm Drain Operating ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Traffic Mitigation 46,944 ‐ 35,888 ‐ 35,888 0.0% Library Operation 840 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Main Street Bridge 81,853 ‐ 489,300 (6,373) ‐ 482,927 1.3% Gas Tax 42,618 ‐ 66,432 ‐ 66,432 0.0% Streets and Roads 1,914,860 ‐ 1,216,855 20,000 1,236,855 1.6% Measures A 450,875 ‐ 68,585 ‐ 68,585 0.0% Park/Facilities Development 1,034,390 7,393,900 ‐ 240,000 7,633,900 3.2% Affordable Housing ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,000,000 1,000,000 Public Facilities 723,854 ‐ 3,406,619 213,162 3,619,781 6.3% Police Grants 11,708 ‐ 200,000 ‐ 200,000 0.0% Measure W ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Lot Retirement/Acquisition 687,175 ‐ 430,000 ‐ 430,000 0.0% CZI Grant ‐ ‐ ‐ 500,000 500,000 Capital General 388,681 2,586,900 240,000 230,000 3,056,900 18.2% Drainage Capital 83,980 ‐ 1,217,159 ‐ 1,217,159 0.0% Library Capital 910,745 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6,378,523 17,111,638 1,980,000 456,789 19,548,427 14.2% Vehicle Replacement 70,087 ‐ 44,067 ‐ 44,067 0.0% Equipment Replacement 489,491 ‐ 545,481 ‐ 545,481 0.0% Risk Management 455,373 ‐ 957,163 ‐ 957,163 0.0% Pension Stabilization 1,041,748 ‐ 1,152,095 ‐ 1,152,095 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 2,056,699 ‐ 2,698,806 ‐ 2,698,806 0.0% Judgement Bonds ‐ B ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ DEBT SERVICE FUNDS ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 17,158,110 30,871,615 1,980,000 456,789 33,308,404 7.9% Total All Funds 37,248,398 $ $ 54,337,459 $ 2,067,600 $ 600,789 $ 57,005,848 5%
TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE AND
Total Other Funds
City of Half Moon Bay
FY 2022‐23 Revised Budget
Summary of Expenditures & Transfers by Fund
Budget Adjustments
410
Audited Revenues & Expenditures Revenue Projected
Fund Balance Trsfrs In & Trsfrs Out Over(Under) Fund Balance 7/1/2022 Budget Budget Expenditures 6/30/2023
GENERAL FUND
101 General Fund $ 15,585,152 $ 23,075,847 $ (23,697,444) $ (621,597) $ 14,963,555
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
201 Sewer Operating (259,605) 8,677,200 (7,199,706) 1,477,494 1,217,889 202 Sewer Capital 1 5,761,702 259,001 (3,861,465) (3,602,464) 2,159,237 Total Enterprise Funds 5,502,097 8,936,201 (11,061,171) (2,124,970) 3,377,127
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
111 Storm Drain Operating 343,839 ‐ 2,500 2,500 346,339 112 Traffic Mitigation 4,170,411 113,983 (35,888) 78,095 4,248,506 113 Library Operation 109,805 ‐ 100 100 109,905 121 Main Street Bridge ‐ 482,927 (482,927) ‐ (482,927) 122 Gas Tax 1,183,119 507,983 (66,432) 441,551 1,624,670 123 Streets and Roads 3,041,834 152,709 (1,236,855) (1,084,146) 1,957,689 124 Measures A 1,081,524 385,643 (68,585) 317,059 1,398,583 125 Park/Facilities Development 3,195,533 5,139,424 (7,633,900) (2,494,476) 701,057 126 Affordable Housing 2,117,586 27,184 (1,000,000) (972,816) 1,144,770 127 Public Facilities 1,611,077 2,997,246 (3,619,781) (622,535) 988,542 128 Police Grants 695,033 178,029 (200,000) (21,971) 673,061 132 Measure W 468,198 ‐ 201,276 201,276 669,474 133 Lot Retirement/Acquisition 1,848,079 18,800 (430,000) (411,200) 1,436,879 134 CZI Grant ‐ 500,000 ‐ (500,000) ‐ 151 Capital General 1,871,600 1,790,069 (3,056,900) (1,266,831) 604,769 152 Drainage Capital 985,122 392,500 (1,217,159) (824,659) 160,462 153 Library Capital 416,574 ‐ 3,500 3,500 420,074 Total Special Revenue and Capital Funds 23,622,262 12,410,947 (19,548,427) (7,137,480) 16,484,782
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
301 Vehicle Replacement 404,127 56,167 (44,067) 12,100 416,226 302 Equipment Replacement 891,084 548,981 (545,481) 3,500 894,584 303 Risk Management 2,546,772 698,204 (957,163) (258,959) 2,287,813 304 Pension Stabilization 1,440,210 1,156,095 (1,152,095) 4,000 1,444,210 Total Internal Service Funds 5,282,192 2,459,447 (2,698,806) (239,359) 5,042,833
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
142 Judgement Bonds ‐ B ‐ 6,131 ‐ ‐ 6,131 Total Debt Service Funds 6,131 ‐ ‐ ‐ 6,131 Total Other Funds 34,412,682 $ $ 23,806,594 $ (33,308,404) $ (9,501,810) $ 24,910,872 Total All Funds 49,997,834 $ $ 46,882,441 $ (57,005,848) $ (10,123,407) $ 39,874,428 City of Half Moon Bay
FY 2022‐23 Revised Budget
Summary of Fund Balances by Fund
411
BUSINESS OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY
AGENDA REPORT
For meeting of: April 4, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
VIA: Matthew Chidester, City Manager
FROM: Maz Bozorginia, Public Works Director/City Engineer Jonathan Woo, Assistant Engineer
TITLE: CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AWARD FOR THE 2023 STREET MAINTENANCE PROJECT (CIP PROJECT NO. 0514)
______________________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to award and execute a construction contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, Dryco Construction, Inc., of Fremont, California in the amount of $281,177 and approve a construction contingency amount not exceeding an amount of $42,176.55 (15 percent) for potential change orders for the 2023 Street Maintenance Project (CIP Project No. 0514).
FISCAL IMPACT:
This project is funded by the Pavement Management and Traffic Safety Program (CIP Project No. 0514). There are sufficient funds to award this contract.
STRATEGIC ELEMENT:
This action supports the Infrastructure and Environment, Healthy Communities and Public Safety Element of the Strategic Plan.
BACKGROUND:
The 2023 Street Maintenance Project scope consists of performing “dig-out” base repairs, surface milling, asphalt concrete overlay, slurry sealing, traffic markings, traffic striping, and other related work on the following streets:
• Jenna Lane between Pine Avenue and Kelly Avenue
• Arleta Way between Grove Street and Magnolia Street
• Alsace Lorraine Avenue/First Avenue between Granelli Avenue to Filbert Street • Second Avenue between Metzgar Street and Grove Street On Wednesday, March 8, 2023, the City advertised a request for public bids for the 2023 Street Maintenance Project.
412
Construction work will be performed during the day, Monday through Friday, between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The contractor will be posting public notices in advance of construction. Traffic control and intermittent closures will be required and communicated in advance with affected properties.
BID SUMMARY:
The City received five (5) bids before the scheduled bid opening time and date of 2:00 PM on Wednesday, March 29, 2023. The bids and engineer’s estimate are summarized as follows:
Bidder Base Bid
Engineer’s Estimate $398,185.10
Dryco Construction, Inc. $281,177.00
G. Bortolotto & Company, Inc. $286,915.20
Andreini Brothers, Inc. $299,946.00
Half Moon Bay Grading & Paving, Inc. $300,935.83
QA Contractors, Inc. $355,924.35
DISCUSSION:
The lowest responsive and responsible bidder, Dryco Construction, Inc.’s base bid of $281,177 is approximately 29 percent below the Engineer’s Estimate. City Staff have reviewed the bid from Dryco and determined that it is acceptable and free from significant material discrepancies. Construction contingencies will also be needed for the project. Staff requests council to approve a construction contingency amount not exceeding $42,176.55 (15 percent) for potential change orders for the 2023 Street Maintenance Project (CIP Project No. 0514).
ATTACHMENT:
Resolution
413
Resolution No. C-2023-____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HALF MOON BAY TO AUTHORIZE THE
CITY MANAGER TO AWARD AND EXECUTE A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH DRYCO CONSTRUCTION, INC. OF FREMONT, CALIFORNIA, IN THE AMOUNT OF $281,177, APPROVE A CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY IN AN AMOUNT NOT EXCEEDING 15 PERCENT, OR $42,176.55, OF THE CONTRACT AWARD AMOUNT FOR POTENTIAL CHANGE ORDERS FOR THE 2023 STREET MAINTENANCE PROEJCT (CIP PROJECT NO. 0514)
WHEREAS, the 2023 Street Maintenance Project (under Fiscal Year 2022-23) scope consists of performing “dig-out” base repairs, surface milling, asphalt concrete overlay, slurry sealing, traffic markings, traffic striping, and other related work, along the project limits; and WHEREAS, the City advertised the project on Wednesday, March 8, 2023, and opened five (5) bids that were received at the scheduled time, date, and place, as set forth in the Public Contract Code for the 2023 Street Maintenance Project; and WHEREAS, the lowest responsive and responsible bid for the base bid schedule was submitted by Dryco Construction, Inc., out of Fremont, California, in the amount of $281,177.00; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City of Half Moon Bay hereby:
1) Accepts the submitted five (5) responsive bids; and
2) Authorizes the City Manager to award and execute a construction contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, Dryco Construction, Inc., out of Fremont, California, in the total amount of $281,177; and
3) Approves the construction contingency in an amount not exceeding 15 percent, or $42,176.55, of the contract award amount for potential change orders for the 2023 Street Maintenance Project (CIP Project No. 0514).
***************************************************************** I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted on the 4th day of April 2023 by the City Council of Half Moon Bay by the following vote:
AYES, Councilmembers:
NOES, Councilmembers:
ABSENT, Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:
414
ATTEST: APPROVED:
___________________________ _____________________________ Jessica Blair, City Clerk Deborah Penrose, Mayor
415