Agenda packet — Hanford City Council, November 15, 2022 (part 2 of 2)

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 283
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

2.0 Emissions Summary
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 2 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 284
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2022

0.1859

1.7353

1.5734

3.6800e-
003

0.3385

0.0747

0.4131

0.1360

0.0695

0.2055

0.0000
329.2458
329.2458

0.0627

0.0117
334.2871
2023

0.2771

2.3539

2.7358

6.8900e-
003

0.2233

0.0947

0.3180

0.0609

0.0891

0.1500

0.0000
621.9419
621.9419

0.0765

0.0327
633.5833
2024

3.3224

0.2967

0.4020

8.6000e-
004

0.0225

0.0124

0.0349

6.1100e-
003

0.0116

0.0177

0.0000

77.5196

0.0131

2.7800e-
003

78.6745
Maximum

3.3224

2.3539

2.7358

6.8900e-
003

0.3385

0.0947

0.4131

0.1360

0.0891

0.2055

0.0000
621.9419
621.9419

0.0765

0.0327
633.5833
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2022

0.1859

1.7353

1.5734

3.6800e-
003

0.3385

0.0747

0.4131

0.1360

0.0695

0.2055

0.0000
329.2456
329.2456

0.0627

0.0117
334.2869
2023

0.2771

2.3539

2.7358

6.8900e-
003

0.2233

0.0947

0.3180

0.0609

0.0891

0.1500

0.0000
621.9415
621.9415

0.0765

0.0327
633.5829
2024

3.3224

0.2967

0.4020

8.6000e-
004

0.0225

0.0124

0.0349

6.1100e-
003

0.0116

0.0177

0.0000

77.5195

0.0131

2.7800e-
003

78.6744
Maximum

3.3224

2.3539

2.7358

6.8900e-
003

0.3385

0.0947

0.4131

0.1360

0.0891

0.2055

0.0000
621.9415
621.9415

0.0765

0.0327
633.5829
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 3 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 285
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C) ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
Quarter
Start Date
End Date
Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1 6-1-2022
8-31-2022

0.9352

0.9352
2 9-1-2022
11-30-2022

0.7361

0.7361
3 12-1-2022
2-28-2023

0.6808

0.6808
4 3-1-2023
5-31-2023

0.6643

0.6643
5 6-1-2023
8-31-2023

0.6619

0.6619
6 9-1-2023
11-30-2023

0.6595

0.6595
7 12-1-2023
2-29-2024

0.7734

0.7734
8 3-1-2024
5-31-2024

3.0670

3.0670
Highest

3.0670

3.0670
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 4 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 286
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area

2.1758

4.0000e-
005

4.3300e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

8.4500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
003
Energy

0.0329

0.2995

0.2516

1.8000e-
003

0.0228

0.0000
712.7508
712.7508

0.0688

0.0136
718.5123
Mobile

1.5399

2.5764

13.6146

0.0318

3.1256

0.0287

3.1543

0.8365

0.0269

0.8634

0.0000
3,006.816
9 3,006.816
9 0.1639

0.1711
3,061.904
9 Waste

0.0000

89.2551

0.0000

89.2551

5.2748

0.0000
221.1258
Water

0.0000

26.6596

58.7492

85.4088

2.7477

0.0658
173.7119
Total

3.7487

2.8759

13.8705

0.0336

3.1256

0.0514

3.1771

0.8365

0.0497

0.8862
115.9148
3,778.325
4 3,894.240
2 8.2553

0.2505
4,175.264
0 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 5 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 287
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area

2.0378

4.0000e-
005

4.3300e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

8.4500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
003
Energy

0.0329

0.2995

0.2516

1.8000e-
003

0.0228

0.0000
712.7508
712.7508

0.0688

0.0136
718.5123
Mobile

1.5399

2.5764

13.6146

0.0318

3.1256

0.0287

3.1543

0.8365

0.0269

0.8634

0.0000
3,006.816
9 3,006.816
9 0.1639

0.1711
3,061.904
9 Waste

0.0000

89.2551

0.0000

89.2551

5.2748

0.0000
221.1258
Water

0.0000

26.6596

58.7492

85.4088

2.7477

0.0658
173.7119
Total

3.6106

2.8759

13.8705

0.0336

3.1256

0.0514

3.1771

0.8365

0.0497

0.8862
115.9148
3,778.325
4 3,894.240
2 8.2553

0.2505
4,175.264
0 Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Demolition
Demolition
6/1/2022
5/31/2022
5 0
2 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
6/29/2022
7/12/2022
5 10
3 Grading
Grading
7/13/2022
8/30/2022
5 35
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

3.68 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 6 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 288
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C) 4 Building Construction
Building Construction
8/31/2022
1/30/2024
5 370
5 Paving
Paving
1/31/2024
2/27/2024
5 20
6 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
2/28/2024
3/26/2024
5 20
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 8.00
81 0.73
Building Construction
Cranes
1 7.00
231

0.29 Demolition
Excavators
3 8.00
158

0.38 Grading
Excavators
2 8.00
158

0.38 Building Construction
Forklifts
3 8.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 Paving
Pavers
2 8.00
130

0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
2 8.00
132

0.36 Paving
Rollers
2 8.00
80 0.38
Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
2 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Scrapers
2 8.00
367

0.48 Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 7.00
97 0.37
Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 8.00
97 0.37
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 709,266; Non-Residential Outdoor: 236,422; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating
–
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 105
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 7 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 289
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0000

0.0000
Total

0.0000

0.0000
Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
4 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Welders
1 8.00
46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition
6 15.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
7 18.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
8 20.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
9 151.00

77.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
6 15.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 30.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 8 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 290
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0000

0.0000
Total

0.0000

0.0000
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0000

0.0000
Total

0.0000

0.0000
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 9 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 291
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0000

0.0000
Total

0.0000

0.0000
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.0983

0.0000

0.0983

0.0505

0.0000

0.0505

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0159

0.1654

0.0985

1.9000e-
004

8.0600e-
003

7.4200e-
003

0.0000

16.7197

5.4100e-
003

0.0000

16.8549
Total

0.0159

0.1654

0.0985

1.9000e-
004

0.0983

8.0600e-
003

0.1064

0.0505

7.4200e-
003

0.0579

0.0000

16.7197

5.4100e-
003

0.0000

16.8549
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 10 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 292
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

3.1000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

2.4500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
004

0.0000

7.2000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

0.5984

2.0000e-
005

0.6044
Total

3.1000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

2.4500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
004

0.0000

7.2000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

0.5984

2.0000e-
005

0.6044
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.0983

0.0000

0.0983

0.0505

0.0000

0.0505

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0159

0.1654

0.0985

1.9000e-
004

8.0600e-
003

7.4200e-
003

0.0000

16.7197

5.4100e-
003

0.0000

16.8549
Total

0.0159

0.1654

0.0985

1.9000e-
004

0.0983

8.0600e-
003

0.1064

0.0505

7.4200e-
003

0.0579

0.0000

16.7197

5.4100e-
003

0.0000

16.8549
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 11 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 293
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

3.1000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

2.4500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
004

0.0000

7.2000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

0.5984

2.0000e-
005

0.6044
Total

3.1000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

2.4500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
004

0.0000

7.2000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

0.5984

2.0000e-
005

0.6044
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.1611

0.0000

0.1611

0.0639

0.0000

0.0639

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0634

0.6798

0.5082

1.0900e-
003

0.0286

0.0263

0.0000

95.4356

0.0309

0.0000

96.2072
Total

0.0634

0.6798

0.5082

1.0900e-
003

0.1611

0.0286

0.1897

0.0639

0.0263

0.0903

0.0000

95.4356

0.0309

0.0000

96.2072
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 12 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 294
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.2000e-
003

8.4000e-
004

9.5400e-
003

3.0000e-
005

2.8000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8100e-
003

7.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.3270

8.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

2.3504
Total

1.2000e-
003

8.4000e-
004

9.5400e-
003

3.0000e-
005

2.8000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8100e-
003

7.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.3270

8.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

2.3504
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.1611

0.0000

0.1611

0.0639

0.0000

0.0639

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0634

0.6798

0.5082

1.0900e-
003

0.0286

0.0263

0.0000

95.4354

0.0309

0.0000

96.2071
Total

0.0634

0.6798

0.5082

1.0900e-
003

0.1611

0.0286

0.1897

0.0639

0.0263

0.0903

0.0000

95.4354

0.0309

0.0000

96.2071
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 13 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 295
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.2000e-
003

8.4000e-
004

9.5400e-
003

3.0000e-
005

2.8000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8100e-
003

7.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.3270

8.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

2.3504
Total

1.2000e-
003

8.4000e-
004

9.5400e-
003

3.0000e-
005

2.8000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8100e-
003

7.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.3270

8.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

2.3504
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0751

0.6871

0.7200

1.1900e-
003

0.0356

0.0335

0.0000
101.9591
101.9591

0.0244

0.0000
102.5698
Total

0.0751

0.6871

0.7200

1.1900e-
003

0.0356

0.0335

0.0000
101.9591
101.9591

0.0244

0.0000
102.5698
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 14 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 296
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

7.3300e-
003

0.1860

0.0535

7.1000e-
004

0.0225

2.0700e-
003

0.0245

6.4900e-
003

1.9800e-
003

8.4700e-
003

0.0000

68.0322

4.4000e-
004

0.0102

71.0826
Worker

0.0227

0.0160

0.1812

4.8000e-
004

0.0531

3.0000e-
004

0.0534

0.0141

2.8000e-
004

0.0144

0.0000

44.1739

1.5000e-
003

1.3600e-
003

44.6179
Total

0.0301

0.2020

0.2347

1.1900e-
003

0.0756

2.3700e-
003

0.0780

0.0206

2.2600e-
003

0.0229

0.0000
112.2060
112.2060

1.9400e-
003

0.0116
115.7005
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0751

0.6871

0.7200

1.1900e-
003

0.0356

0.0335

0.0000
101.9590
101.9590

0.0244

0.0000
102.5697
Total

0.0751

0.6871

0.7200

1.1900e-
003

0.0356

0.0335

0.0000
101.9590
101.9590

0.0244

0.0000
102.5697
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 15 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 297
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

7.3300e-
003

0.1860

0.0535

7.1000e-
004

0.0225

2.0700e-
003

0.0245

6.4900e-
003

1.9800e-
003

8.4700e-
003

0.0000

68.0322

4.4000e-
004

0.0102

71.0826
Worker

0.0227

0.0160

0.1812

4.8000e-
004

0.0531

3.0000e-
004

0.0534

0.0141

2.8000e-
004

0.0144

0.0000

44.1739

1.5000e-
003

1.3600e-
003

44.6179
Total

0.0301

0.2020

0.2347

1.1900e-
003

0.0756

2.3700e-
003

0.0780

0.0206

2.2600e-
003

0.0229

0.0000
112.2060
112.2060

1.9400e-
003

0.0116
115.7005
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.2045

1.8700

2.1117

3.5000e-
003

0.0910

0.0856

0.0000
301.3462
301.3462

0.0717

0.0000
303.1383
Total

0.2045

1.8700

2.1117

3.5000e-
003

0.0910

0.0856

0.0000
301.3462
301.3462

0.0717

0.0000
303.1383
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 16 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 298
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0110

0.4425

0.1355

2.0200e-
003

0.0664

2.8600e-
003

0.0692

0.0192

2.7400e-
003

0.0219

0.0000
193.5100
193.5100

8.3000e-
004

0.0290
202.1586
Worker

0.0616

0.0414

0.4885

1.3700e-
003

0.1569

8.3000e-
004

0.1578

0.0417

7.7000e-
004

0.0425

0.0000
127.0857
127.0857

3.9600e-
003

3.7000e-
003
128.2864
Total

0.0727

0.4838

0.6241

3.3900e-
003

0.2233

3.6900e-
003

0.2270

0.0609

3.5100e-
003

0.0644

0.0000
320.5957
320.5957

4.7900e-
003

0.0327
330.4450
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.2045

1.8700

2.1117

3.5000e-
003

0.0910

0.0856

0.0000
301.3458
301.3458

0.0717

0.0000
303.1380
Total

0.2045

1.8700

2.1117

3.5000e-
003

0.0910

0.0856

0.0000
301.3458
301.3458

0.0717

0.0000
303.1380
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 17 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 299
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0110

0.4425

0.1355

2.0200e-
003

0.0664

2.8600e-
003

0.0692

0.0192

2.7400e-
003

0.0219

0.0000
193.5100
193.5100

8.3000e-
004

0.0290
202.1586
Worker

0.0616

0.0414

0.4885

1.3700e-
003

0.1569

8.3000e-
004

0.1578

0.0417

7.7000e-
004

0.0425

0.0000
127.0857
127.0857

3.9600e-
003

3.7000e-
003
128.2864
Total

0.0727

0.4838

0.6241

3.3900e-
003

0.2233

3.6900e-
003

0.2270

0.0609

3.5100e-
003

0.0644

0.0000
320.5957
320.5957

4.7900e-
003

0.0327
330.4450
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0162

0.1479

0.1778

3.0000e-
004

6.7500e-
003

6.3500e-
003

0.0000

25.5034

6.0300e-
003

0.0000

25.6542
Total

0.0162

0.1479

0.1778

3.0000e-
004

6.7500e-
003

6.3500e-
003

0.0000

25.5034

6.0300e-
003

0.0000

25.6542
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 18 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 300
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

9.1000e-
004

0.0375

0.0112

1.7000e-
004

5.6200e-
003

2.4000e-
004

5.8600e-
003

1.6200e-
003

2.3000e-
004

1.8600e-
003

0.0000

16.1123

7.0000e-
005

2.4100e-
003

16.8320
Worker

4.8100e-
003

3.0800e-
003

0.0382

1.1000e-
004

0.0133

7.0000e-
005

0.0134

3.5300e-
003

6.0000e-
005

3.5900e-
003

0.0000

10.4838

3.0000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

10.5774
Total

5.7200e-
003

0.0406

0.0494

2.8000e-
004

0.0189

3.1000e-
004

0.0192

5.1500e-
003

2.9000e-
004

5.4500e-
003

0.0000

26.5961

3.7000e-
004

2.7000e-
003

27.4094
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0162

0.1479

0.1778

3.0000e-
004

6.7500e-
003

6.3500e-
003

0.0000

25.5034

6.0300e-
003

0.0000

25.6541
Total

0.0162

0.1479

0.1778

3.0000e-
004

6.7500e-
003

6.3500e-
003

0.0000

25.5034

6.0300e-
003

0.0000

25.6541
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 19 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 301
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

9.1000e-
004

0.0375

0.0112

1.7000e-
004

5.6200e-
003

2.4000e-
004

5.8600e-
003

1.6200e-
003

2.3000e-
004

1.8600e-
003

0.0000

16.1123

7.0000e-
005

2.4100e-
003

16.8320
Worker

4.8100e-
003

3.0800e-
003

0.0382

1.1000e-
004

0.0133

7.0000e-
005

0.0134

3.5300e-
003

6.0000e-
005

3.5900e-
003

0.0000

10.4838

3.0000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

10.5774
Total

5.7200e-
003

0.0406

0.0494

2.8000e-
004

0.0189

3.1000e-
004

0.0192

5.1500e-
003

2.9000e-
004

5.4500e-
003

0.0000

26.5961

3.7000e-
004

2.7000e-
003

27.4094
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

9.8800e-
003

0.0953

0.1463

2.3000e-
004

4.6900e-
003

4.3100e-
003

0.0000

20.0265

6.4800e-
003

0.0000

20.1885
Paving

0.0000

0.0000
Total

9.8800e-
003

0.0953

0.1463

2.3000e-
004

4.6900e-
003

4.3100e-
003

0.0000

20.0265

6.4800e-
003

0.0000

20.1885
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 20 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 302
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.3000e-
004

2.8000e-
004

3.4500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.9468

3.0000e-
005

0.9552
Total

4.3000e-
004

2.8000e-
004

3.4500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.9468

3.0000e-
005

0.9552
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

9.8800e-
003

0.0953

0.1463

2.3000e-
004

4.6900e-
003

4.3100e-
003

0.0000

20.0265

6.4800e-
003

0.0000

20.1884
Paving

0.0000

0.0000
Total

9.8800e-
003

0.0953

0.1463

2.3000e-
004

4.6900e-
003

4.3100e-
003

0.0000

20.0265

6.4800e-
003

0.0000

20.1884
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 21 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 303
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.3000e-
004

2.8000e-
004

3.4500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.9468

3.0000e-
005

0.9552
Total

4.3000e-
004

2.8000e-
004

3.4500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.9468

3.0000e-
005

0.9552
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

3.2875

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.8100e-
003

0.0122

0.0181

3.0000e-
005

6.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.5533

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.5569
Total

3.2893

0.0122

0.0181

3.0000e-
005

6.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.5533

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.5569
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 22 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 304
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

8.7000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

6.9000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.4000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.4100e-
003

6.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

6.5000e-
004

0.0000

1.8935

5.0000e-
005

1.9104
Total

8.7000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

6.9000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.4000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.4100e-
003

6.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

6.5000e-
004

0.0000

1.8935

5.0000e-
005

1.9104
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

3.2875

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.8100e-
003

0.0122

0.0181

3.0000e-
005

6.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.5533

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.5568
Total

3.2893

0.0122

0.0181

3.0000e-
005

6.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.5533

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.5568
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 23 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 305
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

8.7000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

6.9000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.4000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.4100e-
003

6.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

6.5000e-
004

0.0000

1.8935

5.0000e-
005

1.9104
Total

8.7000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

6.9000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.4000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.4100e-
003

6.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

6.5000e-
004

0.0000

1.8935

5.0000e-
005

1.9104
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 24 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 306
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

1.5399

2.5764

13.6146

0.0318

3.1256

0.0287

3.1543

0.8365

0.0269

0.8634

0.0000
3,006.816
9 3,006.816
9 0.1639

0.1711
3,061.904
9 Unmitigated

1.5399

2.5764

13.6146

0.0318

3.1256

0.0287

3.1543

0.8365

0.0269

0.8634

0.0000
3,006.816
9 3,006.816
9 0.1639

0.1711
3,061.904
9 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
General Office Building
4,605.07
1,044.89
330.96
8,330,408
8,330,408
Total
4,605.07
1,044.89
330.96
8,330,408
8,330,408
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
General Office Building

9.50 7.30

7.30 33.00

48.00 19.00
77 19
4 4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
General Office Building

0.517111

0.052324

0.170980

0.155671

0.027786

0.007423

0.013424

0.026160

0.000649

0.000313

0.023324

0.001439

0.003395
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 25 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 307
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000

0.0000
386.7437
386.7437

0.0626

7.5800e-
003
390.5680
Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000

0.0000
386.7437
386.7437

0.0626

7.5800e-
003
390.5680
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0329

0.2995

0.2516

1.8000e-
003

0.0228

0.0000
326.0071
326.0071

6.2500e-
003

5.9800e-
003
327.9444
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0329

0.2995

0.2516

1.8000e-
003

0.0228

0.0000
326.0071
326.0071

6.2500e-
003

5.9800e-
003
327.9444

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Install High Efficiency Lighting
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 26 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 308
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
General Office
Building

6.10914e
+006

0.0329

0.2995

0.2516

1.8000e-
003

0.0228

0.0000
326.0071
326.0071

6.2500e-
003

5.9800e-
003
327.9444
Total

0.0329

0.2995

0.2516

1.8000e-
003

0.0228

0.0000
326.0071
326.0071

6.2500e-
003

5.9800e-
003
327.9444
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
General Office
Building

6.10914e
+006

0.0329

0.2995

0.2516

1.8000e-
003

0.0228

0.0000
326.0071
326.0071

6.2500e-
003

5.9800e-
003
327.9444
Total

0.0329

0.2995

0.2516

1.8000e-
003

0.0228

0.0000
326.0071
326.0071

6.2500e-
003

5.9800e-
003
327.9444
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 27 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 309
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C) Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Interior

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
General Office
Building

4.17994e
+006
386.7437

0.0626

7.5800e-
003
390.5680
Total
386.7437

0.0626

7.5800e-
003
390.5680
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
General Office
Building

4.17994e
+006
386.7437

0.0626

7.5800e-
003
390.5680
Total
386.7437

0.0626

7.5800e-
003
390.5680
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 28 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 310
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C) Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Exterior
No Hearths Installed
Use Low VOC Cleaning Supplies
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

2.0378

4.0000e-
005

4.3300e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

8.4500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
003
Unmitigated

2.1758

4.0000e-
005

4.3300e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

8.4500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 29 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 311
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.3287

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

1.8467

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

4.0000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

4.3300e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

8.4500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
003
Total

2.1758

4.0000e-
005

4.3300e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

8.4500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
003
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 30 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 312
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.3287

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

1.7086

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

4.0000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

4.3300e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

8.4500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
003
Total

2.0378

4.0000e-
005

4.3300e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

8.4500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
003
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 31 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 313
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C) Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated

85.4088

2.7477

0.0658
173.7119
Unmitigated

85.4088

2.7477

0.0658
173.7119

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
General Office
Building

84.0325 /

51.5038

85.4088

2.7477

0.0658
173.7119
Total

85.4088

2.7477

0.0658
173.7119
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 32 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 314
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
General Office
Building

84.0325 /

51.5038

85.4088

2.7477

0.0658
173.7119
Total

85.4088

2.7477

0.0658
173.7119
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated

89.2551

5.2748

0.0000
221.1258
Unmitigated

89.2551

5.2748

0.0000
221.1258
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 33 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 315
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
General Office
Building
439.7

89.2551

5.2748

0.0000
221.1258
Total

89.2551

5.2748

0.0000
221.1258
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
General Office
Building
439.7

89.2551

5.2748

0.0000
221.1258
Total

89.2551

5.2748

0.0000
221.1258
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 34 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 316
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

11.0 Vegetation

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 35 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 317
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
MARCH 2022
CITY OF HANFORD – Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use | 151 Appendix B: CHRIS Search Records
Prepared by SSJIC dated January 18, 2022.

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 318
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

To: Shin Tu Record Search 22-004
Precision Civil Engineering, Inc.
1234 O Street
Fresno, CA 93721

Date: January 18, 2022

Re: City of Hanford – Lassen Rezone

County: Kings

Map(s): Hanford 7.5’

CULTURAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCH

The California O ffice of Historic Preservation (OHP) contracts with the California Historical R esources Information System’s (CHRIS) regional Information Centers (ICs) to maintain information in the CHRIS inventory and make it available to local, state, and federal agencies, cultural resource professionals, Native American tribes, res earchers, and t he public. Re commendations mad e by IC coordina tors or their staff regarding the interpretation and application of this information are advisory only. Such recommendations do not necessarily represent the eval uation or opinion of the State Hi storic Preserva tion Officer in carrying out t he O HP’s regulatory authority under federal and state law.

The following are the results of a search of the cultural resource files at the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center. These files include kno wn and recorded cultural resources sites, inventory and excavation reports filed with this office, a nd resources listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the OHP Built Environment Resources Directory, California State His torical L andmarks, Calif ornia Register of Historical Resources, Calif ornia Inventory of Historic Resources, and California Points of Historical Interest. Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been sub mitted to the OHP are availa ble via this rec ords search. Addi tional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area.

PRIOR CULTURAL RESOURCE STUDIES CONDUCTED WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND THE ONE-HALF MILE RADIUS

According to the information in our files, there have been no previous cultural resource studies in the project area. There have been eight studies conducted within the one-half mile radius, KI-00028, 00108, 00109, 00110, 00111, 00210, 00229, and 00289.

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 319
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C) R
ecord Search 22-004

KNOWN/RECORDED CULTURAL RESOURCES WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND THE ONE-HALF MILE RADIUS There is one r ecorded res ource wit hin th e pr oject area, P- 16-00246. It is not known if any ot her resource exists there. There are eight recorded res ources within the one -half mile radius , P -16-000122, 000130, 000131, 000132, 000133, 000289, 000290, and 000476. These resources prima rily consist of historic era buildings. They also include an historic era railroad, an historic era canal, and an historic era trash scatter.

Resources P-16-000289 (Taoist Temple , located at 12 China Alley) and P-16-000290 (Hanford Carnegie Library, located at 10 9 E. 8 th Street) have been given National Register status code s of 1 S, indicating they are listed in the National Register of Historic Places by the Keeper. They are also listed in the California Reg ister of Historical Resources. Resource P-16-000246, People’s Ditch, has been given a National Register status code of 2S2, indicat ing it has been determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places by a consensus through the Section 106 process. It is also listed in the California Register of Historical Resources.

There are no other recorded cultural resources within the project area or radius that are listed in the National Register o f Hi storic Places , the Ca lifornia Reg ister of H istorical R esources, t he Cali fornia Poin ts o f Hi storical Interest, California Inventory of Historic Resources, or the California State Historic Landmarks.

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
We understand this project site includes existing structures . No information was given as to the age of the existing structures or the nature of the project. According to our records, no structures listed at the provided address have ever been recorded or evaluated for hist orical significance. Therefore, if this project will result in alteration or demolition of any existing structures more than 45 years old, then we recommend the structures first be recorded and evaluated for historical significance. If t he project will result in any ground disturbance activities on a ny undeveloped land, we recommend a qualified, professiona l consultant first conduct a field survey t o determine if any cultural resources are present. If ground disturbance will not take place on a ny vacant land and no structures more than 45 years old will be impacted, then no further cultural resource investigation is recommended at this time. However, if any cultural resources are unearthed during any ground disturbance a ctivities, all work must halt in the area of the find and a qualified, professional consultant should be called out to assess the findings and make the appropriate mitigation recommendations. A list of qualified consultants can be found at www.chrisinfo.org.

We also recommend that you contact the Native American Heritage Commission in Sacramento. They will p rovide you wi th a current li st of N ative American i ndividuals/organizations that can ass ist yo u wi th information regarding cultural resources that may not be included in the CHRIS Inventory and that may be of concern to the Native group s in the area. The Commission can consult their "Sacred Lands Inventory" file to determine what sacred resources, if any, exist within this project area and the way in which these resources might be ma naged. Fina lly, pl ease c onsult wi th t he lead age ncy on th is projec t t o deter mine if any ot her cultural re source inv estigation is r equired. If you ne ed a ny additional in formation or have a ny questi ons or concerns, please contact our office at (661) 654-2289.

By:

Ce
leste M. Thomson, Coordinator Date: January 18, 2022
P
lease note that invoices for Information Center services will be sent under separate cover from the California State University, Bakersfield Accounting Office.

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 320
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
MARCH 2022
CITY OF HANFORD – Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use | 152 Appendix C: Early Consultation Letters
Received by the City of Hanford.

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 321
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” DISTRICT 6 OFFICE
1352 WEST OLIVE AVENUE |P.O. BOX 12616 |FRESNO, CA 93778-2616 (559) 981-7373 | FAX (559) 488-4195 | TTY 711
www.dot.ca.gov

October 4, 2021
06-KIN-198-0000001062
GPA #2021-01 RZ#2021-09

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CITY OF HANFORD

Sent via email

Gabrielle Meyers
Community Development-Planning Division
315-321 North Douty Street
Hanford, CA 93230

Dear Gabrielle Meyers:

Thank you for the opportunity to review the General Plan Amendment and Rezone at four different locations. The Amendment No. 2021-01 A requests to change the current designation of 1.04 acres of Downtown Mixed-Use to Service Commercial. The Amendment No. 2021-01 B requests to change the current designation of 1.45 acres of Neighborhood Mixed Use to Regional Commercial. The Amendment No. 2021-01C is to change the current designation of 28 acres of Medium-Density Residential to Corridor Mixed Use. The Amendment No. 2021-01 D is to change the 2.06 acres of Corridor Mixed Use to Public Utility. All four rezones are considered infill development and are located in the City of Hanford, in Kings County.

The mission of Caltrans is to provide a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system to enhance California’s economy and livability. The Local Development ‐Intergovernmental Review (LD‐IGR) Program reviews land use projects and plans through the lenses of our mission and state planning priorities of infill, conservation, and travel‐efficient development. To ensure a safe and efficient transportation system, we encourage early consultation and coordination with local jurisdictions and project proponents on all development projects that utilize the multimodal transportation network.

Caltrans provides the following comments consistent with the State’s smart mobility goals that support a vibrant economy and sustainable communities:

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 322
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C) Gabrielle Meyers
October 4, 2021

Page 2 ends

“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment”

1. C
altrans recommends that the future site plans for any of the proposed development be submitted to Caltrans for review when the plans are available. If the City of Hanford requires the Project to conduct a Traffic Impact Study, Caltrans would like the opportunity to review and comment on the Scope of Work.

2. I
t is recommended that the City and Kings County should consider the importance of developing a traffic impact fee program to fund future improvements to local and State facilities driven by the continuous and accumulated impacts of development in the region. Caltrans, in the past, has partnered with the City as well as the County on various improvement projects on SR 198 and will continue to partner with the City future need project in the area.

3. G
iven that the future development may attract regional traffic, Caltrans recommends the project proponents(s) conduct a vehicle-miles traveled (VMT) study once development is proposed. In the absence of a local agency VMT guideline, the preparer should refer to the Caltrans Vehicle Miles Traveled-Focused Transportation Impact Study Guide, dated May 20, 2020. Improvements for existing/future bike and pedestrian facilities on roads in the vicinity of the Project and connectivity between home to work/home to shops should be considered and included in the VMT mitigation plan.

4. Alt
ernative transportation policies should be applied to the development. An assessment of multi-modal facilities should be conducted to develop an integrated multi-modal transportation system to serve and help alleviate traffic congestion caused by the project and related development in this area of the City. The assessment may include pedestrian walkways linking this proposal to an internal project area walkway, transit facilities, as well as other walkways in the surrounding area.

If you have any further questions, please contact Nicholas Isla at (559) 981-7373 or email [email protected].

Sincerely,
DAVID PADILLA, Branch Chief
Transportation Planning – North
Signing on Behalf of:

Edgar Hernandez, Associate Transportation Planner
Transportation Planning – North

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 323
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C) Hello Gabrielle,

Attached is the signed request for comments for the General Plan Amendment No. 2021-01 (Part A-D), Rezone No. 2021-09 – 2021-12, and Associated Entitlements.

At this time our department has no comments for the proposed rezoning or amendments to the general plan; however, regarding the SPR 2021-05 (Holiday Inn Express), our department would like to include the following comments:

1. If service of a continental breakfast or other meal prep area is proposed, the facility will need to obtain an annual food vending permit from our department. All food service equipment must be new, commercial grade, and approved for food service by an independent testing agency. A pre-construction plan check of the food service area may also be required. Please contact our office at 559-584-1411 for additional information prior to construction.

2. The applicant must submit to our department 3 sets of complete construction plans for the swimming pool and/or spa to be reviewed for compliance with applicable California and local codes and regulations. No construction of the pool or spa is permitted without prior written approval from our department. To access the plan check application visit our website at http://www.countyofkings.com/Health/ehs/forms.

3. Annual fees to operate a public swimming pool and spa, continental breakfast area and operation of the hotel/motel are required by this department. If you have any questions, please contact us at 559-584-14711.

Thank you for this opportunity and please let me know if you have any questions.

Liliana Stransky, MPA, REHS
Environmental Health Officer
Kings County Department of Public Health
330 Campus Drive | Hanford, CA | 93230
Phone: (559)852-2628 | Fax: (559)584-6040
www.countyofkings.com/ehs

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information for the use of the designated recipients. If you are not the intended recipient, (or authorized to receive for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 324
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C) review, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of it or its contents is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please destroy all copies of this communication and any attachments and contact the sender by reply e-mail or telephone 559.584.1411.

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 325
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION

Page 1 of 2 ends

October 25, 2021

Gabrielle de Silva Myers
City of Hanford

Via Email to: [email protected]

Re: Native American Consultation, Pursuant to Senate Bill 18, Government Code §65352.3 and §65352.4, General Plan Amendment No. 2021-01 (Part A through D); Rezone No. 2021-09, -10, - 11, and -12 Project, Kings County

Dear Ms. Myers:

Attached is a consultation list of tribes with traditional lands or cultural places located within the boundaries of the above referenced counties.

Government Code §65352.3 and §65352.4 require local governments to consult with California Native American tribes identified by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for the purpose of avoiding, protecting, and/or mitigating impacts to cultural places when creating or amending General Plans, Specific Plans and Community Plans.

The law does not preclude initiating consultation with the tribes that are culturally and traditionally affiliated within your jurisdiction. The NAHC believes that this is the best practice to ensure that tribes are consulted commensurate with the intent of the law.

The NAHC also believes that agencies should also include with their notification letters, information regarding any cultural resources assessment that has been completed on the area of potential effect (APE), such as:

1. The results of any record search that may have been conducted at an Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), including, but not limited to:

• A listing of any and all known cultural resources that have already been recorded or are adjacent to the APE, such as known archaeological sites; • Copies of any and all cultural resource records and study reports that may have been provided by the Information Center as part of the records search response;
• Whether the records search indicates a low, moderate or high probability that unrecorded cultural resources are located in the APE; and • If a survey is recommended by the Information Center to determine whether previously unrecorded cultural resources are present.

2. The results of any archaeological inventory survey that was conducted, including:

• Any report that may contain site forms, site significance, and suggested mitigation measures.

CHAIRPERSON
Laura Miranda
Luiseño

VICE CHAIRPERSON
Reginald Pagaling
Chumash

SECRETARY
Merri Lopez-Keifer
Luiseño

PARLIAMENTARIAN
Russell Attebery
Karuk

COMMISSIONER
William Mungary
Paiute/White Mountain
Apache

COMMISSIONER
Julie Tumamait-
Stenslie
Chumash

COMMISSIONER
[Vacant]

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
Christina Snider
Pomo

NAHC HEADQUARTERS
1550 Harbor Boulevard
Suite 100
West Sacramento,
California 95691
(916) 373-3710
[email protected]
NAHC.ca.gov

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 326
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

Page 2 of 2 ends

All information regarding site locations, Native American human remains, and associated funerary objects should be in a separate confidential addendum, and not be made available for public disclosure in accordance with Government Code §6254.10.

3. The result of the Sacred Lands File (SLF) check conducted through the Native American Heritage Commission.

The request form can be found at http://nahc.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Local-Government- Tribal-Consultation-List-Request-Form-Update.pdf.

4. Any ethnographic studies conducted for any area including all or part of the APE; and

5. Any geotechnical reports regarding all or part of the APE.

Lead agencies should be aware that records maintained by the NAHC and CHRIS are not exhaustive. A tribe may be the only source of information regarding the existence of a tribal cultural resource.

This information will aid tribes in determining whether to request formal consultation. In the event, that they do, having the information beforehand will help to facilitate the consultation process.

If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify the NAHC. With your assistance, we are able to assure that our consultation list remains current.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at my email address:

[email protected].

Sincerely,

Andrew Green
Cultural Resources Analyst

Attachment

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 327
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C) From: Samantha McCarty
To: Gabrielle Myers
Cc: Shana Powers; Maria Gonzales; William K. Barrios; Paige Berggren; Damion Cuara Subject: RE: General Plan Amendment No. 2021-01 (Part A-D), Rezone No. 2021-09 - 2021-12, and Associated Entitlements
Date: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 2:20:02 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Dear Gabrielle,

I apologize, I realize I made a mistake in my response to you. This email will have the correct response.

Thank you for contacting the Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi-Yokut Tribe regarding: General Plan Amendment No. 2021-01 (Part A-D), Rezone No. 2021-09 - 2021-12, and Associated Entitlements.

The Tribe has concerns with parts A and B and is requesting to have monitors on site for all future development. If you have any questions, comments, and or concerns please contact myself or the Santa Rosa Rancheria Cultural Department. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Samantha McCarty
Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi-Yokut Tribe
Cultural Specialist ll
[email protected]
Office: (559) 924-1278 x 4091
Cell: (559) 633-6640

*PLEASE KEEP ALL CULTURAL STAFF IN EMAILS UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE

From: Samantha McCarty
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 2:14 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Shana Powers <[email protected]>; Maria Gonzales <mgonzales@tachi-yokut- nsn.gov>; William K. Barrios <[email protected]>; Paige Berggren <pberggren@tachi- yokut-nsn.gov>; Damion Cuara <[email protected]> Subject: General Plan Amendment No. 2021-01 (Part A-D), Rezone No. 2021-09 - 2021-12, and Associated Entitlements

Dear Gabrielle,

Thank you for contacting the Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi-Yokut Tribe regarding: General Plan Amendment No. 2021-01 (Part A-D), Rezone No. 2021-09 - 2021-12, and Associated Entitlements.

The Tribe has concerns with parts A and B and is requesting to have monitors on site for all ground

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 328
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C) disturbance related to the project. If you have any questions, comments, and or concerns please contact myself or the Santa Rosa Rancheria Cultural Department. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Samantha McCarty
Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi-Yokut Tribe
Cultural Specialist ll
[email protected]
Office: (559) 924-1278 x 4091
Cell: (559) 633-6640

*PLEASE KEEP ALL CULTURAL STAFF IN EMAILS UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 329
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

Plan Review Team
Land Management
[email protected]

6111 Bollinger Canyon Road 3370A
San Ramon, CA 94583

PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 1
September 9, 2021

Gabrielle Myers
City of Hanford
317 N Douty St
Hanford, CA 93230

Ref: Gas and Electric Transmission and Distribution

Dear Gabrielle Myers,

Thank you for submitting the Site Plan Review No 2021-22 plans for our review. PG&E will review the submitted plans in relationship to any existing Gas and Electric facilities within the project area. If the proposed project is adjacent/or within PG&E owned property and/or easements, we will be working with you to ensure compatible uses and activities near our facilities.

Attached you will find information and requirements as it relates to Gas facilities (Attachment 1) and Electric facilities (Attachment 2). Please review these in detail, as it is critical to ensure your safety and to protect PG&E’s facilities and its existing rights.

Below is additional information for your review:

1. This plan review process does not replace the application process for PG&E gas or electric service your project may require. For these requests, please continue to work with PG&E Service Planning:
https://www.pge.com/en_US/business/services/building-
and-renovation/overview/overview.page.

2. If the project being submitted is part of a larger project, please include the entire scope of your project, and not just a portion of it. PG&E’s facilities are to be incorporated within any CEQA document. PG&E needs to verify that the CEQA document will identify any required future PG&E services.

3. An engineering deposit may be required to review plans for a project depending on the size, scope, and location of the project and as it relates to any rearrangement or new installation of PG&E facilities.

Any proposed uses within the PG&E fee strip and/or easement, may include a California Public Utility Commission (CPUC) Section 851 filing. This requires the CPUC to render approval for a conveyance of rights for specific uses on PG&E’s fee strip or easement. PG&E will advise if the necessity to incorporate a CPUC Section 851filing is required.

This letter does not constitute PG&E’s consent to use any portion of its easement for any purpose not previously conveyed. PG&E will provide a project specific response as required.

Sincerely,

Plan Review Team
Land Management

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 330
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 2
Attachment 1 – Gas Facilities

There could be gas transmission pipelines in this area which would be considered critical facilities for PG&E and a high priority subsurface installation under California law. Care must be taken to ensure safety and accessibility. So, please ensure that if PG&E approves work near gas transmission pipelines it is done in adherence with the below stipulations. Additionally, the following link provides additional information regarding legal requirements under California excavation laws: https://www.usanorth811.org/images/pdfs/CA-LAW-2018.pdf

1. Standby Inspection: A PG&E Gas Transmission Standby Inspector must be present during any demolition or construction activity that comes within 10 feet of the gas pipeline. This includes all grading, trenching, substructure depth verifications (potholes), asphalt or concrete demolition/removal, removal of trees, signs, light poles, etc. This inspection can be coordinated through the Underground Service Alert (USA) service at 811. A minimum notice of 48 hours is required. Ensure the USA markings and notifications are maintained throughout the duration of your work.

2. Access: At any time, PG&E may need to access, excavate, and perform work on the gas pipeline. Any construction equipment, materials, or spoils may need to be removed upon notice.

Any temporary construction fencing installed within PG&E’s easement would also need to be capable of being removed at any time upon notice. Any plans to cut temporary slopes exceeding a 1:4 grade within 10 feet of a gas transmission pipeline need to be approved by PG&E Pipeline Services in writing PRIOR to performing the work.

3. Wheel Loads: To prevent damage to the buried gas pipeline, there are weight limits that must be enforced whenever any equipment gets within 10 feet of traversing the pipe.

Ensure a list of the axle weights of all equipment being used is available for PG&E’s Standby Inspector. To confirm the depth of cover, the pipeline may need to be potholed by hand in a few areas.

Due to the complex variability of tracked equipment, vibratory compaction equipment, and cranes, PG&E must evaluate those items on a case-by-case basis prior to use over the gas pipeline (provide a list of any proposed equipment of this type noting model numbers and specific attachments).

No equipment may be set up over the gas pipeline while operating. Ensure crane outriggers are at least 10 feet from the centerline of the gas pipeline. Transport trucks must not be parked over the gas pipeline while being loaded or unloaded.

4. Grading: PG&E requires a minimum of 36 inches of cover over gas pipelines (or existing grade if less) and a maximum of 7 feet of cover at all locations. The graded surface cannot exceed a cross slope of 1:4.

5. Excavating: Any digging within 2 feet of a gas pipeline must be dug by hand. Note that while the minimum clearance is only 12 inches, any excavation work within 24 inches of the edge of a pipeline must be done with hand tools. So to avoid having to dig a trench entirely with hand tools, the edge of the trench must be over 24 inches away. (Doing the math for a 24 inch

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 331
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 3
wide trench being dug along a 36 inch pipeline, the centerline of the trench would need to be at least 54 inches [24/2 + 24 + 36/2 = 54] away, or be entirely dug by hand.)

Water jetting to assist vacuum excavating must be limited to 1000 psig and directed at a 40° angle to the pipe. All pile driving must be kept a minimum of 3 feet away.

Any plans to expose and support a PG&E gas transmission pipeline across an open excavation need to be approved by PG&E Pipeline Services in writing PRIOR to performing the work.

6. Boring/Trenchless Installations: PG&E Pipeline Services must review and approve all plans to bore across or parallel to (within 10 feet) a gas transmission pipeline. There are stringent criteria to pothole the gas transmission facility at regular intervals for all parallel bore installations.

For bore paths that cross gas transmission pipelines perpendicularly, the pipeline must be potholed a minimum of 2 feet in the horizontal direction of the bore path and a minimum of 12 inches in the vertical direction from the bottom of the pipe with minimum clearances measured from the edge of the pipe in both directions. Standby personnel must watch the locator trace (and every ream pass) the path of the bore as it approaches the pipeline and visually monitor the pothole (with the exposed transmission pipe) as the bore traverses the pipeline to ensure adequate clearance with the pipeline. The pothole width must account for the inaccuracy of the locating equipment.

7. Substructures: All utility crossings of a gas pipeline should be made as close to perpendicular as feasible (90° +/- 15°). All utility lines crossing the gas pipeline must have a minimum of 12 inches of separation from the gas pipeline. Parallel utilities, pole bases, water line ‘kicker blocks’, storm drain inlets, water meters, valves, back pressure devices or other utility substructures are not allowed in the PG&E gas pipeline easement.

If previously retired PG&E facilities are in conflict with proposed substructures, PG&E must verify they are safe prior to removal. This includes verification testing of the contents of the facilities, as well as environmental testing of the coating and internal surfaces. Timelines for PG&E completion of this verification will vary depending on the type and location of facilities in conflict.

8. Structures: No structures are to be built within the PG&E gas pipeline easement. This includes buildings, retaining walls, fences, decks, patios, carports, septic tanks, storage sheds, tanks, loading ramps, or any structure that could limit PG&E’s ability to access its facilities.

9. Fencing: Permanent fencing is not allowed within PG&E easements except for perpendicular crossings which must include a 16 foot wide gate for vehicular access. Gates will be secured with PG&E corporation locks.

10. Landscaping: Landscaping must be designed to allow PG&E to access the pipeline for maintenance and not interfere with pipeline coatings or other cathodic protection systems. No trees, shrubs, brush, vines, and other vegetation may be planted within the easement area.

Only those plants, ground covers, grasses, flowers, and low-growing plants that grow unsupported to a maximum of four feet (4’) in height at maturity may be planted within the easement area.

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 332
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 4

11. Cathodic Protection: PG&E pipelines are protected from corrosion with an “Impressed Current” cathodic protection system. Any proposed facilities, such as metal conduit, pipes, service lines, ground rods, anodes, wires, etc. that might affect the pipeline cathodic protection system must be reviewed and approved by PG&E Corrosion Engineering.

12. Pipeline Marker Signs: PG&E needs to maintain pipeline marker signs for gas transmission pipelines in order to ensure public awareness of the presence of the pipelines.

With prior written approval from PG&E Pipeline Services, an existing PG&E pipeline marker sign that is in direct conflict with proposed developments may be temporarily relocated to accommodate construction work. The pipeline marker must be moved back once construction is complete.

13. PG&E is also the provider of distribution facilities throughout many of the areas within the state of California. Therefore, any plans that impact PG&E’s facilities must be reviewed and approved by PG&E to ensure that no impact occurs which may endanger the safe operation of its facilities.

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 333
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 5

Attachment 2 – Electric Facilities

It is PG&E’s policy to permit certain uses on a case by case basis within its electric transmission fee strip(s) and/or easement(s) provided such uses and manner in which they are exercised, will not interfere with PG&E’s rights or endanger its facilities. Some examples/restrictions are as follows:

1. Buildings and Other Structures: No buildings or other structures including the foot print and eave of any buildings, swimming pools, wells or similar structures will be permitted within fee strip(s) and/or easement(s) areas. PG&E’s transmission easement shall be designated on subdivision/parcel maps as “RESTRICTED USE AREA – NO BUILDING.”

2. Grading: Cuts, trenches or excavations may not be made within 25 feet of our towers.

Developers must submit grading plans and site development plans (including geotechnical reports if applicable), signed and dated, for PG&E’s review. PG&E engineers must review grade changes in the vicinity of our towers. No fills will be allowed which would impair ground-to- conductor clearances. Towers shall not be left on mounds without adequate road access to base of tower or structure.

3. Fences: Walls, fences, and other structures must be installed at locations that do not affect the safe operation of PG&’s facilities. Heavy equipment access to our facilities must be maintained at all times. Metal fences are to be grounded to PG&E specifications. No wall, fence or other like structure is to be installed within 10 feet of tower footings and unrestricted access must be maintained from a tower structure to the nearest street. Walls, fences and other structures proposed along or within the fee strip(s) and/or easement(s) will require PG&E review; submit plans to PG&E Centralized Review Team for review and comment.

4. Landscaping: Vegetation may be allowed; subject to review of plans. On overhead electric transmission fee strip(s) and/or easement(s), trees and shrubs are limited to those varieties that do not exceed 15 feet in height at maturity. PG&E must have access to its facilities at all times, including access by heavy equipment. No planting is to occur within the footprint of the tower legs. Greenbelts are encouraged.

5. Reservoirs, Sumps, Drainage Basins, and Ponds: Prohibited within PG&E’s fee strip(s) and/or easement(s) for electric transmission lines.

6. Automobile Parking: Short term parking of movable passenger vehicles and light trucks (pickups, vans, etc.) is allowed. The lighting within these parking areas will need to be reviewed by PG&E; approval will be on a case by case basis. Heavy equipment access to PG&E facilities is to be maintained at all times. Parking is to clear PG&E structures by at least 10 feet.

Protection of PG&E facilities from vehicular traffic is to be provided at developer’s expense AND to PG&E specifications. Blocked-up vehicles are not allowed. Carports, canopies, or awnings are not allowed.

7. Storage of Flammable, Explosive or Corrosive Materials: There shall be no storage of fuel or combustibles and no fueling of vehicles within PG&E’s easement. No trash bins or incinerators are allowed.

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 334
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 6

8. Streets and Roads: Access to facilities must be maintained at all times. Street lights may be allowed in the fee strip(s) and/or easement(s) but in all cases must be reviewed by PG&E for proper clearance. Roads and utilities should cross the transmission easement as nearly at right angles as possible. Road intersections will not be allowed within the transmission easement.

9. Pipelines: Pipelines may be allowed provided crossings are held to a minimum and to be as nearly perpendicular as possible. Pipelines within 25 feet of PG&E structures require review by PG&E. Sprinklers systems may be allowed; subject to review. Leach fields and septic tanks are not allowed. Construction plans must be submitted to PG&E for review and approval prior to the commencement of any construction.

10. Signs: Signs are not allowed except in rare cases subject to individual review by PG&E.

11. Recreation Areas: Playgrounds, parks, tennis courts, basketball courts, barbecue and light trucks (pickups, vans, etc.) may be allowed; subject to review of plans. Heavy equipment access to PG&E facilities is to be maintained at all times. Parking is to clear PG&E structures by at least 10 feet. Protection of PG&E facilities from vehicular traffic is to be provided at developer’s expense AND to PG&E specifications.

12. Construction Activity: Since construction activity will take place near PG&E’s overhead electric lines, please be advised it is the contractor’s responsibility to be aware of, and observe the minimum clearances for both workers and equipment operating near high voltage electric lines set out in the High-Voltage Electrical Safety Orders of the California Division of Industrial Safety (
https://www.dir.ca.gov/Title8/sb5g2.html), as well as any other safety regulations.

Contractors shall comply with California Public Utilities Commission General Order 95 (http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/gos/GO95/go_95_startup_page.html) and all other safety rules. No construction may occur within 25 feet of PG&E’s towers. All excavation activities may only commence after 811 protocols has been followed.

Contractor shall ensure the protection of PG&E’s towers and poles from vehicular damage by (installing protective barriers) Plans for protection barriers must be approved by PG&E prior to construction.

13. PG&E is also the owner of distribution facilities throughout many of the areas within the state of California. Therefore, any plans that impact PG&E’s facilities must be reviewed and approved by PG&E to ensure that no impact occurs that may endanger the safe and reliable operation of its facilities.

8.A.d
Packet Pg. 335
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C) Kurt Lavenson & Lesly Avedisian
1842 Leimert Boulevard
Oakland, CA 94602
510-530-0970
October 26, 2022
Natalie Corral
City Clerk
City of Hanford
319 N. Douty Street
Hanford, CA 93230
via email to: [email protected]
RE: General Plan Amendment 2021-01C and Pre/Rezone 2021-11 Speciﬁcally parcels: 014-221-020 and 014-221-026
Dear Ms. Corral,
We are writing to provide our comments for the City Council Meeting meeting scheduled for November 1, 2022, speciﬁcally General Plan Amendment No. 2021-01C and the Pre- Zone/Rezone 2021-11. As long-time owners of land within the subject site (also known as a portion of Island #4 pending Annexation) we support and are strongly in favor of the proposed General Plan Amendment and the Rezoning.

We also support the General Plan Amendment and Pre/Rezoning for its effect on our neighbors who own adjacent parcels described in the hearing notice. It is important to us, and we think it is important to the larger community, that development in the pending Island #4 Annexation area be allowed and encouraged. The zoning change from Medium Density Residential (R-M) to Corridor Mixed Use (MX-C) will facilitate this.

The General Plan Amendment and Pre/Rezoning will alleviate a serious conﬂict with the Kings County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) that prohibits most forms of residential development. After the rezoning, the land could be developed into an array of mixed uses, including some speciﬁed residential uses, in combinations that satisfy the conditions of the ALUCP. That will provide the maximum beneﬁt to this growing area of the community and to the resurgence of commerce along E. Lacey Boulevard.

We thank you and the City Council members for your time and attention on these matters and we appreciate all of the efforts of the Planning Department to resolve the General Plan conﬂicts.

Sincerely,
Kurt Lavenson Lesly Avedisian

8.A.e
Packet Pg. 336
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Lavenson-Avedisian comments to City Council re Zoning Changes_10-26-2022_SIGNED (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 11/15/2022

AGENDA SECTION: A

SUBJECT:

Administration: Authorization for the City Manager to execute contracts with Retail Strategies, Inc for an amount not to exceed $70,000, for the Development of a 5-Year Downtown Strategic Plan and Retail consulting and appropriation of $45,000 from the Downtown Parking and Improvement fund and $25,000 from the General Fund to cover the costs of the contracts.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council, by motion, Authorize the City Manager to execute contracts with Retail Strategies, Inc for an amount not to exceed $70,000, for the Development of a 5-Year Downtown Strategic Plan and Retail consulting and Appropriate $45,000 from the Downtown Parking and Improvement fund and $20,000 from the General Fund to cover the costs of the contracts..

BACKGROUND:

In 2017, after many years of stagnant growth in the downtown district and amid concerns that efforts were not being made to address the lack of a vibrant downtown, discussion began the Council level regarding the need for reviving Hanford's downtown.

During the City Council Goals and Objectives session that year, the Council identified Downtown Incentives as a priority item. Past discussions of Downtown Incentives were as follows:
· June 2015 City Council discussed Downtown incentives
· July 2016 Recommendation from Downtown Revitalization Committee to Joint City

Additionally, past Council and Planning Commission discussions were as follows:
· August 2016 Report to City Council including
o Report of Building Conditions
o Recommendation from Downtown Revitalization Committee o Recommendation on Downtown Incentives

9.A
Packet Pg. 337
· September 2016 Report to City Council on the Abatement Process

Fast forward to today and concerns still exist with regards to Zoning, Property Use and the mix of businesses that is required to truly “activate” Hanford’s downtown. Incentives have never been provided because any financial support over $1,000 triggers prevailing wage for a private project and adds significant costs for the project applicant.

Accordingly, Council and members of the community have recently mentioned the need for a Downtown Strategic Plan. Staff agrees that creating a strategic plan is a crucial first step in determining the vision and path for our downtown. Often times, community leaders are fearful of investing in a master plan that will ultimately “sit on a shelf.” Accordingly, staff is presenting this proposal from Retail Strategies, Inc. With Downtown Strategies, they choose to meet communities where they are. They build on the community’s existing plans and ideas rather than reinventing the wheel and duplicating efforts. Their efforts include:
· Their downtown team coming to our market to meet with downtown businesses, citizens and city leaders to help understand the visions for Hanford; and · Putting together a 5 year strategic plan focused on Policy & Administration, Walkability & Beautification and Commercial Real Estate.

The attached proposal and agreements provide a solution to addressing the future of Hanford’s downtown. The consultant will conduct the community outreach, host public meetings, bring property owners together with retail opportunities and train City staff to take advantage of retail data. All of which, will be part of the Strategic Plan and Retail outreach efforts to be developed and supported by Retail Strategies, Inc.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The approval of the contracts will require the appropriation of $45,000 from the Dowtown Parking & Improvement District (Fund 025) and $25,000 from the General Fund.

ATTACHMENTS:

Downtown Strategies Partnership - Hanford, CA
Downtown Strategies - Hanford, CA Agreement
Retail Academy Agreement - Hanford, CA

9.A
Packet Pg. 338
retailstrategies.com | [205] 314-0386 | [email protected] 2200 Magnolia Ave South, Suite 100 Birmingham, AL
Strictly Private & Confidential
Pricing Valid for 60 Days
Downtown Revitalization Partnership
2022
Prepared for Hanford, California
September 19, 2022

DOWNTOWN FIVE-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN & IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT

9.A.a
Packet Pg. 339
Attachment: Downtown Strategies Partnership - Hanford, CA (Admin: Downtown Strategic Plan & Retail Outreach) Executive Summary
ICSC Names Lacy Beasley to Board of Trustees

IN THE NEWS
Lacy Beasley, President of Retail Strategies, was appointed to ICSC’s Board of Trustees for an initial three-year term. She was one of 16 new trustees added to the board, and one of only two members representing the public sector.

The board provides input in helping ICSC achieve its goal of serving its more than 70,000 members globally by proactively advocating and communicating the critical social, civic, and economic role played by the retail real estate industry across the world.

Lacy has cemented herself as a go-to source in the commercial real estate world, developing a niche working with municipalities on their retail development strategies. View the full list of the Board of Trustees here.

December 14, 2021
Downtown Strategies exists to provide realistic and implementable solutions for communities to revitalize their downtowns. Led by a team of practitioners and real estate experts, our combination of real-world experience uniquely qualifies us to assist with placemaking, backfilling vacancies, and increasing tourism. Serving rural communities in 22 states, Downtown Strategies is the leading national firm for downtown revitalization planning.

Communities do not suffer from a lack of ideas; they struggle with knowing where to start when it comes to implementing. With our approach, we focus on a five-year timeframe rather than brainstorming everything you could ever potentially do within your downtown. We believe that action and implementation are more important than a flashy twenty-year vision.

We’ve been in your shoes as community leaders and know what it’s like to manage downtown revitalization efforts. Our plan will identify where your community should focus its energy and efforts right now. Implementing our short-term, feasible strategies will incrementally shift the trajectory of your downtown and create the spark that you and your community desire.

9.A.a
Packet Pg. 340
Attachment: Downtown Strategies Partnership - Hanford, CA (Admin: Downtown Strategic Plan & Retail Outreach) Our Process

DOWNTOWN STRATEGIES
Policy &
Administration
Tourism &
Promotion
Economic
Vitality
Market
Analysis Design
thoughtful design
supports a community’s
transformation.
uncover and define the
economic potential
in your Downtown.
set the foundation for
smart growth.
creating opportunity
for investment.
power your
economic engine.

Downtown Roadmap
Creating a strategic plan is a crucial first step in determining the vision and path for your downtown.

Oftentimes, community leaders are fearful of investing in a master plan that will ultimately “sit on a shelf.” With Downtown Strategies, we meet communities where they are. We build on your existing plans and ideas rather than reinventing the wheel and duplicating efforts. What we deliver, you can implement.

The Five Pillars
Through our Downtown Strategic Visioning process, we assess the five pillars of your downtown’s mix to provide a true downtown roadmap.

Critical factors for successful implementation: • Community Buy-In • Communication
• Support
• Resources
Downtown Strategies sanctioned by USDA
as a national technical assistance provider

IN THE NEWS
On May 31, 2022, USDA unveiled a free digital toolkit to help rural leaders build placemaking plans in small towns and communities across America. As part of that toolkit, USDA has identified sanctioned technical assistance providers as national or regional partners to assist communities in building strategic plans, of which Downtown Strategies is included.

June 8, 2022

9.A.a
Packet Pg. 341
Attachment: Downtown Strategies Partnership - Hanford, CA (Admin: Downtown Strategic Plan & Retail Outreach) Strategic Visioning Workshop + Tour of Study Area
• We begin the process with a detailed kick-off call to introduce our team and examine the current status of your Downtown.
• An electronic community input survey will be circulated to gain insight on your Downtown’s past, present, and future. • Our team will host an in-market stakeholder input session with property owners, merchants, business owners, community leaders, and elected officials to gain feedback and allow open dialogue. • During the in-market visit our team will also conduct a walking tour of the defined study area with your team Custom Market Analysis
• Identification of market trade area using mobile data analysis • Trade area demographics (population, income, housing, etc.) • Market and retail GAP analysis for trade area (i.e. leakage and surplus) • Tapestry lifestyles – psychographic profile of trade area • Consumer Spending Pattern Reports
Downtown Five-Year Strategic Plan
Your downtown will be evaluated and a customized, strategic, asset-based, and market driven plan will be presented to your team. This plan will include practical, actionable, and transformational strategies defined and developed considering the following:
• Connectivity & Walkability
• Landscaping & Streetscapes
• Public Art
• Historic Preservation
• Special Events & Promotions
• Wayfinding Signage
• Supporting Entrepreneurs
• Incentives & Financial Tools
• Zoning & Codes
• Identifying Partnerships
• Catalyst Projects
• Community Input Survey Results
• Transportation & Parking
• Messaging & Branding
• Hospitality
• Retail & Restaurant Recruitment
• Backfilling Vacancies
• Real Estate Analysis
• Commute Patterns Report
• Identification of priority business categories for
entrepreneurship, recruitment and/or local expansion
• Downtown Walkability Assessment
• Downtown Neighborhood Demographics
Support from your immediate team isn’t enough to see transformational change within your community. Our workshops generate the needed community buy-in from stakeholders to ensure that all parties with a vested interest believe in the vision and are committed to successful implementation.

Once stakeholders leave our session, they’re excited, eager, and ready to contribute to the successful implementation of the overall vision. Consistent communication between our team, your team, and stakeholders is critical to maintain the momentum and commitment.

Scope of Services: Downtown Strategic Plan

DOWNTOWN STRATEGIES

9.A.a
Packet Pg. 342
Attachment: Downtown Strategies Partnership - Hanford, CA (Admin: Downtown Strategic Plan & Retail Outreach) Strategic Vision Implementation Support
• Implementation support of one (1) – Year 1 recommendationfrom strategic plan - collaboratively identified - and development of associated documents, collateral and resources necessary for successful implementation. • Support via email and Zoom to provide collaboration, assess progress, troubleshoot roadblocks, and provide accountability for implementation.
• Data and analytics available upon request
Downtown Real Estate Analysis + Property Owner Toolkit
• Real Estate analysis deliverable identifying approximately five (5) pieces of real estate prime for adaptive re-use, infill, higher and better use, or new development within the downtown. • One (1) hour virtual property owner training to deliver custom market analysis, business recruitment outlook, and marketing toolkit overview.

Marketing Toolkit:
• Custom Site-Specific Property Flyers
• Custom Downtown Community Flyer
• Custom Downtown “There’s Opportunity Here” window signs to promote opportunity rather than vacancy.

Scope of Services: Implementation Support (add-on)

DOWNTOWN STRATEGIES
Our implementation support keeps your team on track by providing accountability, benchmarks, and success stories to share with the community and stakeholders throughout the life of the partnership. Our strategies and recommendations are based on three stages of time and monetary investment:
• little to no cost with immediate impact – just time and energy! • minimal investment that requires proper partnerships & persistence • long-term investment for substantial projects
This allows for your team to build capacity, assemble funds, and generate partnerships and resources that allow for the successful implementation of our plan.

9.A.a
Packet Pg. 343
Attachment: Downtown Strategies Partnership - Hanford, CA (Admin: Downtown Strategic Plan & Retail Outreach) What’s your Community’s Walk Score?
A walkable downtown is highly
desirable by consumers, local
businesses, and municipal leaders. But
what makes a walkable downtown and
how do you improve your community’s
walkability?
A community’s walk score is determined
by analyzing 3 factors: walkable
distance between boundaries, presence
of a comprehensive network of
pathways designed for pedestrians and
cyclists, and variety of restaurants,
retailers, and service providers necessary
for regular life.

The following demographics
represent the population of
residents within a 20-minute
walk time of the Downtown
Study Area. A walk time from
one Downtown boundary to the
next that exceeds 20 minutes is
not considered walkable.

Keep these figures in mind
when imagining the possible
economic impacts of
developing your Downtown
into a walkable destination.

Walkability Assessment

DOWNTOWN STRATEGIES
94 9.A.a
Packet Pg. 344
Attachment: Downtown Strategies Partnership - Hanford, CA (Admin: Downtown Strategic Plan & Retail Outreach) YEAR 1 -2
minimal
investment
$
NOW
no cost$
These recommendations can be
implemented now with minimal cost and
immediate impact.

Plan now to implement these
recommendations in the next 1-2 years.

With proper partnerships & persistence,
these initiatives will elevate your
community with minimal investment.

YEAR 3 -5
long-term
investment
$
These recommendations represent
substantial projects requiring long-
term investment.

Position your community for
transformational change.

Sample Design Recommendation: Zachary, LA
Recommendations: Your Timeline

DOWNTOWN STRATEGIES

9.A.a
Packet Pg. 345
Attachment: Downtown Strategies Partnership - Hanford, CA (Admin: Downtown Strategic Plan & Retail Outreach) Partnership Timeline

DOWNTOWN STRATEGIES
The timeline of our overall partnership(s) will be
established upon execution of a contract and further
defined during the partnership kick-off call(s).

Day 30-60 Day 60 - 120Day 1-30
Kick-off Call
Workshop Schedule
Community Input Survey

DISCOVERY
An in-market process
where our team
engages stakeholders,
merchants, and
community leaders in
thought provoking
conversation, combined
with independent
discovery and market
analysis, to provide a
strategic, asset-based
and market driven plan.

STRATEGIC VISIONING

WORKSHOP &

WALKING TOUR

FIVE-YEAR DOWNTOWN

STRATEGIC VISION
We begin the process of
your Downtown Strategic
Visioning Workshop with a
detailed conference call with
your team to introduce
ourselves and examine the
current status of your
Downtown area.

We’ll learn about your
community and Downtown
organization’s governance
structure, discuss goals that
have already been internally
identified, and uncover
existing roadblocks to your
community achieving its
highest purpose.

STEP 01
Next, we’ll engage in a
detailed discovery phase,
in which our team will
independently analyze
customized data
regarding your
community’s retail mix,
economic vitality, and
opportunities for growth
.

STEP 02
Strategic Plan created and delivered
Includes:
• Market Analysis
• Community input survey results
• Market driven and asset-based
transformation strategies
Day 120 - 365

IMPLEMENTATION
SUPPORT – JUMPSTART
(ADD-ON)
• Implementation support of
one (1) – Year 1
recommendation from
strategic plan.
• Support via email and Zoom
to provide collaboration,
assess progress,
troubleshoot roadblocks,
and provide accountability
for implementation.
• Data and analytics available
upon request
• Downtown Real Estate
Analysis & Property Owner
Training Toolkit

9.A.a
Packet Pg. 346
Attachment: Downtown Strategies Partnership - Hanford, CA (Admin: Downtown Strategic Plan & Retail Outreach) The total fee for completion of work is due upon execution of agreement. Project fees are due within 30 days of receipt of the invoice.

Should the Client request a special assignment, additional work, and/or additional travel needs not specifically
referenced in the contract, we will prepare written
authorization to be signed by the Client in advance of
commencing any additional work.

Pricing valid for 60 days
Product Investment
Downtown Revitalization Partnership
Downtown Five-Year Strategic Plan…. $25,000
Implementation Support (add-on)…. $25,000
$50,000
(-$5,000 bundled discount)
___________________________
$45,000 Total Investment
The timeline of our overall partnership(s) will be established upon execution of a contract and further defined during the partnership kick-off call(s).

Timeline & Investment
Your Team

RETAIL STRATEGIES
Jenn Gregory, President, Downtown Strategies
Jenn is the president of Downtown Strategies, where her focus is on community development for our client communities. Through her Downtown Strategic Visioning Workshop process, Jenn advises communities on market analysis, tourism, economic vitality, and design updates for downtown areas. She also directly assists small businesses in client communities with elevating their digital presence, enhancing their omni-channel marketing strategies, and understanding market challenges in a post-COVID world.

Elliott Cook, Director of Real Estate, Downtown Strategies As the director of real estate, Elliott conducts workshops and executes our Downtown Strategic Plans with a focus on local real estate assets.

Elliott specializes in retail recruitment and focuses on the identification of companies to fill the product and service gaps within each city’s trade area. His primary role is to leverage industry relationships and knowledge to assist retailers’ expansion in our client communities.

Laura Marinos, Director of Client Services, Downtown Strategies As the Director of Client Services, Downtown Strategies Laura oversees the day-to-day management and implementation of services for downtown clients. She specializes in market research, strategic plans, project coordination, and team operations for the Downtown Strategies division of Retail Strategies. Acting as a liaison between clients and the operations team, Laura’s attention to detail and knack for processes make for an excellent client experience.

Jeremy Murdock, Community Development Specialist, Downtown Strategies As the Community Development Specialist for the Downtown Strategies Team, Jeremy utilizes his background in landscape architecture and urban design to analyze the physical condition of our clients’ downtown areas. In addition to facilitating strategic visioning workshops and developing strategic plans, he helps community leaders take action by coordinating efforts with our downtown implementation clients.

9.A.a
Packet Pg. 347
Attachment: Downtown Strategies Partnership - Hanford, CA (Admin: Downtown Strategic Plan & Retail Outreach) 1 AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE

CONSULTING SERVICES

This Agreement to Provide Consulting Services (this “ Agreement”) sets forth the mutual understanding of (the “Client”) Hanford, CA and Retail Strategies, LLC, an Alabama limited liability company (the “Consultant”) on this _________day of _________ 2022 (the “Execution Date”), for the provision of professional consulting services as more fully set forth below.

R E C I T A L S:

The Consultant possesses a high degree of professional skill and experience and is a unique provider of professional consulting services in retail recruitment.

The Client desires to hire the Consultant to provide professional consulting services because of its professional skill and experience.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants and agreements set forth in this Agreement, the Client and the Consultant, intending to be legally bound, do hereby agree as follows:

1. CONSULTING SERVICES. The Consultant agrees to provide the following professional services to the Client as detailed in Exhibit A (a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference) (the “Services”):

2. TERM. The Consultant’s engagement and provision of Services will commence upon the Execut ion Date as set forth above. The Consultant’s engagement and this Agreement will terminate automatically on the third anniversary of the E xecution Date (the “Term”) unless earlier terminated as provided in Section 6 below . At the end of the Term, the Client, acting by and through the Client Representative, may extend the Term at its option for successive one-year periods on such terms and conditions as the Client Representative, acting for and on behalf of the Client, and the Consultant may agree upon in writing.

3. CONSULTING FEE.

A. Consulting Fee. In consideration for providing the Services, the Client agrees to pay the Consultant a consulting fee (the “ Consulting Fee”) in an amount equal to $135,000. The Consulting Fee will be paid in installments of immediately available funds as follows:

Contract Period Payment Date Payment Amount
Year One

Upon execution of this
agreement $45,000
Year Two
On or before the 1st
anniversary of the Execution
Date
$45,000
Year Three
On or before the 2nd
anniversary of the Execution
Date
$45,000

9.A.b
Packet Pg. 348
Attachment: Downtown Strategies - Hanford, CA Agreement (Admin: Downtown Strategic Plan & Retail Outreach) 2 B. Payment Default. If the Client fails to pay any portion of the Consulting Fee on the requisite payment date , the Consultant will immediately cease all Services identified in Exhibit A.

4. CLIENT INFORMATION AND ACCESS.

A. To the extent permitted by law, t he Client will provide the Consultant with access to relevant personnel, facilities, records, reports, and other information (including any information specified in the Consultant’s proposal to the Client) accessible by the Client that the Consultant may reasonably request from time-to-time during the Term. The Client acknowledges and agrees that the Consultant’s scheduled delivery of the Services is dependent upon the timely access to such personnel, facilities, records, reports and other requested information.

B. To facilitate such access and Consultant’s delivery of the Services, the Client designates the City Manager (the “Client Representative”), currently Mario CiFuentez. The Client Representative will serve as the primary liaison betwee n the Consultant and the Client.

The Client Representative will have responsibility for regular communications between the Client and the Consultant, including providing updates in a timely manner through Basecamp. The Client Representative’s communications to the Consultant will include information regarding re tail growth and development, such as actual and prospective business openings and closings, changes in economic drivers (e.g., significant increases or decreases in workforce of major employers, school enrollments, housing or healthcare services) and changes in the ownership of targeted real estate (e.g., transfers of real estate or changes in the finances of ownership). The Client Representative will also be responsible for disseminating updates relative to consultants’ activities related to scope of work to members of local stakeholder groups of the Client (e.g. City Council, Economic Development Boards, and Chamber of Commerce etc.).

C. The Client hereby authorizes the Client Representative (i) to act on behalf of the Client in the day-to-day administration and operation of this Agreement and the arrangements it contemplates and (ii) to execute and deliver on behalf of the Client, such notices, approvals, consents, instruments, amendments or ot her documents as may be necessary or desirable to facilitate or assist the Consultant with the provision of the Services.

5. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. As part of the Services, the Consultant will prepare periodic and final reports including demographic and other research reports that will become the property of the Client upon delivery from the Consultant. Any other reports, memorand a, electronic mail, facsimile transmissions, or other written documents prepared or used by the Consultants in connection with the Services will remain the property of the Consultant. With the Consultant’s prior permission, t he Client may use other information provided by the Consultant, such as specifics related to retailers, developers, site information or other “confidential information” for internal purposes while taking reasonable steps to so limit the use of such materials and maintain its confidentiality.

6. TERMINATION.

A. By the Client At-Will. The Client may terminate this Agreement at any time for any or no reason upon delivery of 30 days’ prior written notice to the Consultant. Any portion of

9.A.b
Packet Pg. 349
Attachment: Downtown Strategies - Hanford, CA Agreement (Admin: Downtown Strategic Plan & Retail Outreach) 3 the Consulting Fee paid prior to such termination of this Agreement is earned when paid and nonrefundable.

B. By the Client Upon the Consultant’s Default. The Client may notify the Consultant within 90 days of the day that the Client knows or should have known that the Consultant breached this Agreement. The Consultant will have 30 days following receipt of such notice to cure any alleged breach. If the Consultant fails to cure any alleged breach within that 30-day period, then the Client may terminate this Agreement. Within 30 days of such termination of this Agreemen t, the Consultant will refund a pro rata portion of the installment of the Consulting Fee previously paid for the contract period during which such termination occurs based upon the number of days remaining in such contract period.

C. By the Consultant At -Will. The Consultant may terminate this Agreement at any time for any or no reason upon delivery of 30 days’ prior written notice to the Client. Within 30 days of such termination of this Agreement, the Consultant will refund a pro rata portion of the installment of the Consulting Fee previously paid for the period during which such termination occurs based upon the number of days remaining in such period.

D. By the Consultant Upon the Client’s Default. The Consultant may notify the Client within 90 days of the day that the Consultant knows or should have known that the Client breached this Agreement. The Client will have 30 days following receipt of such notice to cure any alleged breach. If the Client fails to cure any alleged breach within that 30 -day period, then the Consultant may terminate this Agreement. Any portion of the Consulting Fee paid prior to such termination of this Agreement is earned when paid and nonrefundable.

7. NOTICES. Any notice or communication in connection with this Agreement will be in writing and either delivered personally, sent by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, delivered by a recognized overnight courier service, or transmitted via facsimile or other electronic transmission, addressed as follows:

Client: City Of Hanford, CA
319 N Douty Street
Hanford, CA 93230
559.585.2516
[email protected]

Consultant: Retail Strategies, LLC
2200 Magnolia Ave. South, Suite 100
Birmingham, AL 35205
Email: [email protected]
Fax: (205) 313-3677
Attention: Stephen P. Leara, Esq – EVP | General Counsel

or to such other address as may be furnished in writing by either party in the preceding manner.

Notice shall be deemed to have been properly given for all purposes : (i) if sent by a nationally recognized overnight carrier for next business day delivery, on the first business day following deposit of such notice with such carrier, (ii) if personally delivered, on the actual date of delivery, (iii) if sent by certified U.S. Mail, return receipt requested postage prepaid, on the third business day following the date of mailing, or (iv) if sent by facsimile or email of a PDF document (with

9.A.b
Packet Pg. 350
Attachment: Downtown Strategies - Hanford, CA Agreement (Admin: Downtown Strategic Plan & Retail Outreach) 4 confirmation of transmission), then on the actual date of delivery if sent prior to 5 p.m. Central Time, and on the next business day if sent after such time.

8. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR . The Consultant, in its capacity as a professional consultant to the Client, is and will be at all times an independent contractor. The Consultant does not have the express, implied or apparent authority either (A) to act as the Client’s agent or legal representative or (B) to legally bind the Client, its officers, agents or employees.

9. STANDARD TERMS.

A. Affiliated Services: Client acknowledges that affiliates of consultant act in the capacity of a real estate brokerage service business and may earn fees for services including brokerage, development, leasing and management fees in the performance of such affiliates services which may encompass a portion of the Project. In n o event will the Client be responsible for any such fees, to the extent they are earned pursuant to this paragraph.

B. Applicable Laws: The Consultant will abide by all laws, rules and regulations applicable to the provision of the Services.

C. Insurance: The Consultant will carry all employee insurance necessary to comply with applicable state and federal laws.

D. Third Party Beneficiaries: This Agreement is for the sole benefit of the parties to this Agreement and their permitted successors and assigns. Nothing in this Agreement, whether express or implied, is intended to or will confer upon any other person or entity any legal or equitable right, benefit, or remedy of any nature whatsoever under or by reason of this Agreement.

E. Publicity: The Client agrees that the Consultant may, from time-to-time, use the Client’s name, logo and other identifying information on the Consultant’s website and in marketing and sales materials.

F. Entire Agreement: This Agreement, together with any exhibits or amendments hereto, constitutes the entire agreement of the parties, as a complete and final integration thereof with respect to its subject matter. Any prior written or oral understandings and agreements between the parties are merged into this Agreement, which alone fully and completely expresses their understanding. No representation, warranty, or covenant made by any party which is not contained in this Agreement or expressly referred to herein has been relied on by any party in entering into this Agreement.

G. Further Assurances: Each party hereby agrees to perform any further acts and to execute and deliver any documents which may be reasonably necessary to carry out the provisions of this Agreement.

H. Force Majeure: Neither party to this Agreement will hold the other party responsible for damages or delay in performance caused by acts of God, strikes, lockouts or other circumstances beyond the reasonable co ntrol of the other or the other party’s employees, agents or contractors.

9.A.b
Packet Pg. 351
Attachment: Downtown Strategies - Hanford, CA Agreement (Admin: Downtown Strategic Plan & Retail Outreach) 5 I. Limitation on Liability; Sole Remedy: Each party’s liability to the other party arising out of or related to this Agreement or the Services will not exceed the amount of the Consulting Fee. The Client’s sole remedy in the event of any alleged breach of this Agreement by the Consultant will be the notice, cure, and refund provisions of Section 6(B) of this Agreement.

J. Amendment in Writing : This A greement may not be amended, modifie d, altered, changed, terminated, or waived in any respect whatsoever, except by a further agreement in writing, properly executed by a duly authorized officer of the Consultant and the Client Representative, acting for and on behalf of the Client.

K. Binding Effect: This Agreement will bind the parties and their respective successors and assigns. If any provision in this A greement will be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions will not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.

L. Captions: The captions of this Agreement are for convenience and reference only, are not a part of this Agreement and in no way define, describe, extend, or limit the scope or intent of this Agreement.

M. Construction: This Agreement will be construed in its entirety according to its plai n meaning and will not be construed against the party who provided or drafted it.

N. Prohibition on Assignment : No party to this Agreement may assign its interests or obligations hereunder without the written consent of the other party obtained in advance of any such assignment. No such assignment will in any manner whatsoever relieve any party from its obligations and duties hereunder and such assigning party will in all respects remain liable hereunder irrespective of such assignment.

O. Waiver: Non-enforcement of any provision of this A greement by either party will not constitute a waiver of that provision, nor will it affect the enforceability of that provision or of the remaining terms and conditions of this Agreement.

P. Survival: Section 5 and Section 9(H) will survive termination of this Agreement.

Q. Counterparts; Electronic Transmission : This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts will, together, constitute and be one and the same instrument. A signed copy of this Agreement delivered by telecopy, electronic transmission or other similar means will be deemed to have the same legal effect as delivery of an original signed copy of this Agreement.

[SIGNATURE PAGES FOLLOW]

9.A.b
Packet Pg. 352
Attachment: Downtown Strategies - Hanford, CA Agreement (Admin: Downtown Strategic Plan & Retail Outreach)

6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Client and the Consultant have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers to be effective as of the Executed Date.

CLIENT:

Hanford, CA

By: ______________________________
Name:

Title:

Date:

CONSULTANT:

RETAIL STRATEGIES, LLC

By: ______________________________
Name:

Title:

Date:

9.A.b
Packet Pg. 353
Attachment: Downtown Strategies - Hanford, CA Agreement (Admin: Downtown Strategic Plan & Retail Outreach)

7 EXHIBIT A

DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION

This section outlines what Retail Strategies (the “consultant”) will provide to Hanford, CA (the “client”).

1. PHASE 1: STRATEGIC VISIONING WORKSHOP
• IN-MARKET WORKSHOP
Stakeholder input session hosted and facilitated by Downtown Strategies with property owners, merchants, business owners, community leaders, and elected officials to gain feedback, allow dialogue, and provide immediate support to those needing it most. • MARKET ANALYSIS
• Identification of market trade area using mobile data analysis • Trade area demographics (population, income, housing, etc.) • Market and retail GAP analysis for trade area (i.e. leakage and surplus) • Tapestry lifestyles – psychographic profile of trade area • Consumer Spending Pattern Reports
• Commute Patterns Report
• Identification of priority business categories for entrepreneurship, recruitment and/or local expansion
• Downtown Walkability Assessment
• Downtown Neighborhood Demographics
• DOWNTOWN STRATEGIC PLAN
Downtown will be evaluated and a customized, strategic, asset-based and market driven plan will be provided with transformation strategies defined and developed considering the following:

2. PHASE 2: IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT

1. STRATEGIC VISION IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT
• Implementation support of one (1) – Year 1 recommendation from strategic plan - collaboratively identified - and development of associated documents, collateral and resources necessary for successful implementation.
• Support via email and Zoom to provide collaboration, assess progress, troubleshoot roadblocks, and provide accountability for implementation. • Data and analytics available upon request

2. DOWNTOWN REAL ESTATE ANALYSIS + PROPERTY OWNER TOOLKIT • Real Estate analysis deliverable identifying approximately five (5) pieces of real estate prime for adaptive re-use, infill, higher and better use, or new development within the downtown.
• Connectivity & Walkability
• Landscaping & Streetscapes
• Public Art
• Historic Preservation
• Special Events & Promotions
• Wayfinding Signage
• Transportation & Parking
• Messaging & Branding
• Retail & Restaurant Recruitment
• Backfilling Vacancies
• Real Estate Analysis
• Supporting Entrepreneurs
• Incentives & Financial Tools
• Zoning & Codes
• Identifying Partnerships
• Catalyst Projects
• Community Input Survey Results

9.A.b
Packet Pg. 354
Attachment: Downtown Strategies - Hanford, CA Agreement (Admin: Downtown Strategic Plan & Retail Outreach) 8 • One (1) hour virtual property owner training to deliver custom market analysis, business recruitment outlook, and marketing toolkit overview. • Marketing Toolkit:
• Custom Site-Specific Property Flyers
• Custom Downtown Community Flyer
• Custom Downtown “There’s Opportunity Here” window signs to promote opportunity rather than vacancy.

3. PHASE 3: ONGOING IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT - YEARS 2 & 3 • Ongoing implementation support for three (3) additional strategic recommendations (per year) - to be collaboratively identified - and development of associated documents, collateral, and resources necessary for successful implementation. • Ongoing support via email and Zoom to provide collaboration, assess progress, troubleshoot roadblocks, and provide accountability for implementation. • Delivery of new and refreshed data and analytics.

9.A.b
Packet Pg. 355
Attachment: Downtown Strategies - Hanford, CA Agreement (Admin: Downtown Strategic Plan & Retail Outreach)

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE

CONSULTING AND RELATED SERVICES

THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by and between Retail Strategies, LLC, an Alabama limited liability company (hereinafter referred to as “Consultant”) and the Hanford, CA (hereinafter referred to as “Client”) on this the ______ day of _______, 20 22, ( the “Effective Date”) as follows:

WHEREAS, the Client desires to have performed those consultation services identified on Exhibit A attached hereto by Consultant (the “Project”); and, WHEREAS, Consultant has agreed to provide professional consulting services for the Project to Client as further set forth below.

W-I-T-N-E-S-S-E-T-H:

NOW, THEREFORE, this agreement is made and entered into on the date first above written by and between the Client and Consultant, by which Consultant will provide professional consulting and related services to the Client as hereinafter specified:

3. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant hereby agrees to provide professional services for Client in the form of consulting and related services for the Project as set out in Exhibit A. These professional services are consulting services and not that of a contractor or other provider.

2. TERM
The Term of this Agreement shall commence upon the Effective Date and terminate immediately following the Client’s completion of the Retail Academy Work shop as set forth in Exhibit A or six (6) months after the Effective Date, whichever occurs first.

3. COMPENSATION
As compensation for the consultation services provided herein by Consultant, Client agrees to pay Consultant a total of $25,000. Consultant will invoice Client immediately upon execution

9.A.c
Packet Pg. 356
Attachment: Retail Academy Agreement - Hanford, CA (Admin: Downtown Strategic Plan & Retail Outreach) of the contract. Client must remit payment within fifteen (15) days of receipt of invoice.

Compensation shall be fully earned when paid and as such is nonrefundable.

4. CLIENT RESPONSIBILITIES
(a) Information and Access . In addition to paying Consultant for services according to the preceding paragraph, the Client shall also provide for Consultant: Access to its relevant personnel, facilities, and materials including, but not necessarily limited to, those items specified in Consultant’s proposal to Client, and such records, reports, and information as reasonably requested by Consultant and in Client’s possession.
(b) Scheduling of Workshop. The Parties understand and agree th at the Retail Academy Workshop will take place in Birmingham, Alabama and the time must be agreed upon by Consultant and Client a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to Workshop taking place.

5. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
The Client and Consultant, jointly and separately, acknowledge and agree that the intellectual property of both parties shall remain owned by the respective party. With the exception of Consultant’s periodic and final reports generated for performance of this agreement to or for the Client (w hich shall belong to Client), reports, memorandums, electronic mail, facsimile transmissions and other written and prepared documents shall be owned by the party who authored, generated or who originally possessed the same and nothing in this agreement sha ll contravene said rights. The Client acknowledges that all intellectual property developed during the course of this agreement by Consultant shall belong exclusively to Consultant. However, the Client may utilize any of the foregoing for and on behalf o f its internal operations, but will take steps reasonably necessary with its employees with respect to the use, copying, protection and security of the foregoing. All strategic plans and other materials delivered by Consultant to Client shall belong to Client.

6. APPLICABLE LAWS
Consultant, in its role as a professional service provider of consulting services, shall abide by all laws, rules and regulations applicable to such services.

9.A.c
Packet Pg. 357
Attachment: Retail Academy Agreement - Hanford, CA (Admin: Downtown Strategic Plan & Retail Outreach)

7. INSURANCE
Consultant shall carry all appropriate and necessary insurance to be in compli ance with state and federal laws regarding the insurance coverage of its employees.

8. DEFAULT AND TERMINATION
(a) Default Termination. In the event Consultant should violate any of the terms of this Agreement, Client shall provide Consultant with writt en notice of such default. Consultant shall have a period of thirty (30) days following such notice to cure any alleged deficiencies. Should Consultant fail to cure such default in the time period provided, Client shall be permitted to terminate this Agreement. All fees previously paid by Client to Consultant are understood to be fully earned when paid and are not subject to refund following any termination hereunder. (b) Automatic Termination . This Agreement shall automatically terminate upon the completion of the Retail Academy Workshop but no later than six (6) months after the Execution Date.

9. NOTICES/PARTIES REPRESENTATIVES
All notices, bills, invoices and reports required by this agreement shall be sufficient if sent by the parties hereto in the United Sates Mail, postage prepaid thereon to the addresses noted below:

Client: City Of Hanford, CA
319 N Douty Street
Hanford, CA 93230
559.585.2516
[email protected]

Consultant: Retail Strategies, LLC
2200 Magnolia Ave. South, Suite 100
Birmingham, AL 35205
Email: [email protected]
Fax: (205) 313-3677
Attention: Steve Leara

9.A.c
Packet Pg. 358
Attachment: Retail Academy Agreement - Hanford, CA (Admin: Downtown Strategic Plan & Retail Outreach)

10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
While Consultant’s role will be that of consultant to the Client, Consultant shall be and remain an independent contractor and not act in the role of an agent or legal representative on behalf of the Client. Consultant shall not have the authority to bind or obligate the Client, its officers, agents or employees.

11. MISCELLANEOUS
Third Party Beneficiaries: It is the intent of the parties hereto that there shall be no third party beneficiaries to this agreement.

Final Integration : This agreement, together with any exhibits or amendments hereto, constitutes the entire agreement of the parties, as a complete and final integration thereof with respect to its subject matter. All written or oral understandings and agreements heretofore had between and among the parties are merged into this agreement, which alone fully and completely expresses their understandings. No representation, warranty, or covenant made by any party which is not contained in this agreement or expressly referred to herein have been relied on by any party in entering into this agreement.

Force Majeure: Neither party to this agreement shall hold the other party responsible for damages or delay in performance caused by acts of God, strikes, lockouts or other circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the other or the other party’s employees, agents or contractors.

Amendment in Writing : This agreement may not be amended, modified, altered, changed, terminated, or waived in any respect whatsoever, except by a fu rther agreement in writing, properly executed by all of the parties.

Binding Effect : This Agreement shall bind the parties and their respective personal representatives, heirs, next of kin, legatee, distributees, successors, and assigns. If any

9.A.c
Packet Pg. 359
Attachment: Retail Academy Agreement - Hanford, CA (Admin: Downtown Strategic Plan & Retail Outreach) provision in this agreement shall be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.

Captions: The captions of this agreement are for convenience and reference only, are not a part of this agreement, and in no way define, describe, extend, or limit the scope or intent of this agreement.

Construction: This agreement shall be construed in its entirety according to its plain meaning and shall not be construed against the party who provided or drafted it.

Governing Law : This Agreement shall be construed under the laws of the State of Alabama.

Prohibition on Assignment and Delegation : No party to this agreement may assign or delegate its interests or obl igations hereunder without the written consent of all other parties hereto obtained in advance of any such assignment or delegation. No such assignment or delegation shall in any manner whatsoever relieve any party from its obligations and duties hereunder and such assigning or delegating party shall in all respects remain liable hereunder irrespective of such assignment or delegation.

Waiver: Non-enforcement of any provision of this agreement by either party shall not constitute a waiver of that provision, nor shall it affect the enforceability of that provision or of the remaining terms and conditions of the agreement.

Agreement Date/Counterparts: The date of this agreement is intended as and for a date for the convenient identification of this agreement and is not intended to indicate that this agreement was necessarily executed and delivered on said date. This instrument may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which so executed shall be deemed an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument.

9.A.c
Packet Pg. 360
Attachment: Retail Academy Agreement - Hanford, CA (Admin: Downtown Strategic Plan & Retail Outreach) Brokerage Rights: Client acknowledges that affiliates of Consultant act in the capacity of a real estate brokerage service business and may earn fees for services including brokerage, development, leasing and management fees in the performance of such affiliates services which may encompass a portion of the Project. In no event will the Client be responsible for any such fees, to the extent they are earned pursuant to this paragraph.

CLIENT:

Hanford, CA

By _________________________________

Title _______________________________

Date ______________________________

CONSULTANT:

RETAIL STRATEGIES, LLC

By _________________________________

Title _______________________________

Date _______________________________

9.A.c
Packet Pg. 361
Attachment: Retail Academy Agreement - Hanford, CA (Admin: Downtown Strategic Plan & Retail Outreach)

EXHIBIT A

This section outlines the Services which Retail Strategies (the “consultant”) will provide to the Hanford, CA (the “client”).

A. RESEARCH

1. Identification of priority retail categories for recruitment and/or local expansion

2. Retail Prospect List- Identification of at minimum 10 retail prospects to be targeted for recruitment

3. Contact Information for Retail Prospects

4. Retail Site Selection Criteria for retail prospects

5. Mobile Data Collection from major retail node

6. Retail Gap Analysis for trade area (i.e. leakage and surplus)

7. Peer Market Identification and Trade Area Comparison Analysis

8. Peer Market Retailer Void Analysis

9. Custom demographic research – historical, current, and projected demographics – to include market trade areas by political boundaries, radius/drive times, and custom trade area Identification of retail trade area using political boundaries, drive times and radii and custom boundary geographies.

10. Consumer Spending Patterns and Behavior Report

11. Tapestry Lifestyle Segmentation Analysis – psychographic profile of trade area

B. REAL ESTATE ANALYSIS

1. Retail Real Estate Analysis identifying 5+ real estate sites performed by licensed retail real estate professionals

2. Create Aerial imagery of trade area(s) with traffic counts

3. Identify Target Zones for short- and long-term retail development

4. Property Catalog

C. MARKETING MATERIALS

1. Development of customized marketing guide

2. Customized Retail Recruitment Plan
D. RETAIL ACADEMY

1. Access to Retail Academy: ONLINE Education Course and Resource Library

2. One (1) Retail Academy Workshop, totaling six (6) hours in Birmingham, AL

3. Industry overview from Commercial Real Estate professionals

4. Quarterly 1:1 virtual meeting to discuss progress

9.A.c
Packet Pg. 362
Attachment: Retail Academy Agreement - Hanford, CA (Admin: Downtown Strategic Plan & Retail Outreach)

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 11/15/2022

AGENDA SECTION: B

SUBJECT:

Parks and Community Services: Adoption of Resolution 22-43-R, Authorizing the submittal of a Grant Proposal for the Proposition 64 Public Health and Safety Grant Program for the purpose of funding a Boys & Girls Club in the City of Hanford and Authorization for the City Manager to execute all related documents.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council by motion adopt Resolution 22-43-R and authorize the City Manager to execute
the grant application and agreement, if awarded.

BACKGROUND:

The Need
According to the results of the 2017-2018 California Healthy Kids Survey, the following data reports
marijuana use by the percentage of Hanford students by grade level:

Grade Level 5th 7th 9th 11th
Percent of Use 2% 6% 9% 16%

Context

In November 2016, voters approved Proposition 64, the Control, Regulate, and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA). AUMA legalized the recreational use of marijuana in California for individuals 21 years of age and older. Proposition 64, in pertinent part, provides that a portion of the tax revenue from the cultivation and retail sale of cannabis or cannabis products will be appropriated:

9.B
Packet Pg. 363

To the Board of State and Community Corrections for making grants to local governments to assist with law enforcement, fire protection, or other local programs addressing public health and safety associated with implementing the Control, Regulate, and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act. The board shall not make any grants to local governments that ban both indoor and outdoor commercial cannabis cultivation or ban the retail sale of cannabis or cannabis products pursuant to Section 26200 of the Business and Professions Code or as otherwise provided by law.

The total funding available for this Request for Proposals (RFP) for Cohort 3 is $150,000,000.

The total available grant funds in this RFP are contingent on timely deposits made available to the BSCC through the Proposition 64 Initiative (the Control, Regulate, and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act) via the State and Local Government Law Enforcement Account through the fiscal year 2021-22.

Successful applicants will be funded for a five-year grant project cycle commencing on May 1, 2023, and ending on April 30, 2028. The maximum grant award per agency is $3 Million.

All project components and activities must link to the intent of Proposition 64 public health and safety initiative - local impacts due to the legalization of adult use of recreational cannabis in California. Applicants must identify and address one or more priorities, and the City of Hanford and its partners chose Youth Development/Youth Prevention and Intervention as the priority.

Youth Prevention and Intervention programs should address preventing youth substance use and addiction and intervening to promote healthy behaviors and environments while minimizing illness, injury, and other harms associated with substance use. Approaches may include preventing exposure, preventing youth from progressing from substance use to misuse and preventing the onset of addiction, overdose, and other harms associated with the abuse.

The City of Hanford’s Youth Development Program will partner with the Boys & Girls Club (BGC) of the Sequoias in coordination with the Hanford Elementary School District and the Hanford Unified High School District. The BGC will be open daily for at least 4 hours per day and will operate out of the Coe Park Building.

The BGC will provide a mix of “high yield activities” and curriculum-based programs for youth ages 12-18. All BGC programs will focus on four priority outcomes:

1) Academic success - graduate from high school ready for college or trade school; 2) Good character and citizenship - be an engaged citizen involved in the community and model strong character; and

9.B
Packet Pg. 364
3) Healthy lifestyles - adopt a healthy diet, practice healthy lifestyle choices, and commit to fitness.
4). Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) - provide equitable opportunities to students from lower-income and marginalized households who are often left behind regarding educational achievements and career aspirations due to physical and financial barriers.

These outcomes will be achieved through various mentoring-based programs, service-based programs, and evidence-based curricula focused on substance abuse prevention and teaching leadership skills.

The Boys and Girls Club has developed five evidence-based vital elements that weave themselves through all program delivery:

· A safe, positive environment - provision of age-appropriate settings to create stability, consistency, and a sense of physical and emotional safety.

· Fun - the club generates fun for members. Members develop a a strong sense of belonging through connections established with staff and peers.

· Supportive Relationships - staff members actively cultivate adult and peer mentoring to ensure that every member feels connected to one another

· Opportunities and Expectations - Club youth acquire physical, social, technological, artistic, and life skills.

· Recognition - Clubs recognize and support young people’s self-worth and accomplishments.

In addition, this grant opportunity requires the development of a Local Evaluation Plan (LEP) to ensure that the project can be evaluated according to the specific project goals and objectives.

The LEP will describe the evaluation design and model used to evaluate the program components.

FISCAL IMPACT:

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution 22-43-R (Prop 64)

9.B
Packet Pg. 365
RESOLUTION 22-43-R

RESOLUTION OF TH E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HANFORD

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER ON BEHALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO SUBMIT A GRANT PROPOSAL FOR THE PROPOSITION 64 PUBLIC HEALTH AND

SAFETY GRANT PROGRAM

WHEREAS the City of Hanford desires to participate in the Proposition 64 Public Health and Safety Grant Program funded through the California State and Local Government Law Enforcement Account and administered by the Board of State and Community Corrections (hereafter referred to as the BSCC).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Manager be authorized on behalf of the City Council to submit the grant proposal for this funding and sign the Grant Agreement with the BSCC, including any amendments thereof.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that grant funds received hereunder shall not be used to supplant expenditures controlled by this body.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council agrees to abide by the terms and conditions of the Grant Agreement as set forth by the BSCC.

Passed, approved, and adopted by the City of Hanford in a meeting thereof held on November 15, 2022, by the following:

PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 15th day of November 2022 by the following vote:

AYES: _________________________________________________________________

NOES: _________________________________________________________________

ABSTAINS:_____________________________________________________________

ABSENT:_______________________________________________________________

Kalish Morrow
MAYOR of the City of Hanford

9.B.a
Packet Pg. 366
Attachment: Resolution 22-43-R (Prop 64) (Parks: Resolution 22-43-R. Proposition 64 Public Health and Safet Grant Application) Attest:

Natalie Corral
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF KINGS ) ss

CITY OF HANFORD )

I, Natalie Ortega, City Clerk of the City of Hanford, do hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford held on the _____ day of ___________________, 2022.

Date:

City Clerk

9.B.a
Packet Pg. 367
Attachment: Resolution 22-43-R (Prop 64) (Parks: Resolution 22-43-R. Proposition 64 Public Health and Safet Grant Application)

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 11/15/2022

AGENDA SECTION: C

SUBJECT:

Council: Consideration of a Request for Waiver of Fees for the use of the Civic Auditorium by the Hanford Chamber of Commerce

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council consider the Request for Waiver of Fees for the use of the Civic Auditorium by the Hanford Chamber of Commerce and provide direction to staff accordingly.

BACKGROUND:

At the October 4, 2022 City Council meeting, the Chamber requested that the Council consider reforming a committee to work with the Chamber on the possibility of a future contract and some level of compensation. There was Council consideration to bring back an item to discuss the reformation of a subcommittee and that is the reason that this matter is being reconsidered.

Council formally reviewed the matter at the October 18, 2022 City Council meeting and, after some discussion between Council, the decision was made to table the matter of the subcommittee formation until after a new Council is seated. Additionally, Council directed the Chamber Director to submit a formal request for Council to consider any additional fee waivers.

So far this year (2022), the Chamber of Commerce has used the Civic Auditorium four (4) times for events that they held or sponsored. For those four events that the Chamber was the permit holder for, they received fee waivers totaling $2,275 in facility rental fees. Each time, per City policy, the Chamber was responsible for all costs related to staffing charges, permits, processing fees.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Approval of this request could have a financial impact on the General Fund, dependant upon the formal action that Council may take.

9.C
Packet Pg. 368
ATTACHMENTS:

Chamber partnership request letter

9.C
Packet Pg. 369

113 Court Street, #104 | Hanford, CA 93230 | www.hanfordchamber.com

November 9, 2022

Dear honorable Mayor Morrow and City Council Members,

On behalf of the Hanford Chamber of Commerce, I am requesting a partnership of the City of Hanford for our upcoming Christmas Charity Event. The Christmas Charity Event is an annual fundraiser that the Hanford Chamber has had the honor of hosting for the community for over 20 years. For numerous years the City of Hanford has graciously extended their assistance in providing the venue for this event at no additional cost to the Chamber.

I unfortunately could not find specific details outlined in our previous contract with the City. I believe it was just an understanding between the Hanford Parks and Community Services Department and our organization. As you know, the contact between the Hanford Chamber and the City terminated June 30, 2022. Our organization is still committed to continue hosting this event which provides an opportunity for ten local nonprofits to raise additional funding during the holiday season. We hope that even though the contact is terminated, and are currently working towards a new partnership in the future, that the Council may consider this individual request. The fiscal amount of the request would be $950. The Christmas Charity Event will be held at the Civic Auditorium on December 1, 2022.

If you have any additional questions I will be available during the next City Council meeting.

Thank you in advance for your consideration,

Sincerely,

Amory Marple
Executive Director/CEO
Hanford Chamber of Commerce

9.C.a
Packet Pg. 370
Attachment: Chamber partnership request letter (CC; Chamber Fee Waiver Request)

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 11/15/2022

AGENDA SECTION:

SUBJECT:

Council Future Agenda Items

FISCAL IMPACT:

ATTACHMENTS:

Council Future Agenda Items
Packet Pg. 371

Council Future Agenda Items
Originated
Date Item Originator Staff Lead Date Estimate

12/21/21
Review of City Ordinance related to
property line setbacks for Patio
structures and Driveway Awnings
Council
Consensus

Tom Webb

12/20/2022
7/19/2022 Formal direction from Council on
roundabouts or signalized
intersections in the Downtown
Pedestrian and Traffic Safety project
Council
Consensus
Various 12/6/2022
8/2/2022 Discussion regarding a process to
formally oppose any movement of
groundwater outside of the jurisdiction
of Kings County and update on
Groundwater
Council
Consensus
Jason Waters 12/20/2022
9/20/22 Review of Measurable Objectives for
Parks as previously reviewed and
approved by Council on June 7, 2022
Council
Consensus
Brad Albert 12/6/2022

10.a
Packet Pg. 372
Attachment: Council Future Agenda Items (Council: Future Agenda Items)

Hanford City CouncilNovember 15, 2022

Hanford City Council
November 15, 2022