Agenda packet — Hanford City Council, December 6, 2022 (part 2 of 2)

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 277
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

2.0 Emissions Summary
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 2 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 278
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2022

0.1859

1.7353

1.5734

3.6800e-
003

0.3385

0.0747

0.4131

0.1360

0.0695

0.2055

0.0000
329.2458
329.2458

0.0627

0.0117
334.2871
2023

0.2771

2.3539

2.7358

6.8900e-
003

0.2233

0.0947

0.3180

0.0609

0.0891

0.1500

0.0000
621.9419
621.9419

0.0765

0.0327
633.5833
2024

3.3224

0.2967

0.4020

8.6000e-
004

0.0225

0.0124

0.0349

6.1100e-
003

0.0116

0.0177

0.0000

77.5196

0.0131

2.7800e-
003

78.6745
Maximum

3.3224

2.3539

2.7358

6.8900e-
003

0.3385

0.0947

0.4131

0.1360

0.0891

0.2055

0.0000
621.9419
621.9419

0.0765

0.0327
633.5833
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2022

0.1859

1.7353

1.5734

3.6800e-
003

0.3385

0.0747

0.4131

0.1360

0.0695

0.2055

0.0000
329.2456
329.2456

0.0627

0.0117
334.2869
2023

0.2771

2.3539

2.7358

6.8900e-
003

0.2233

0.0947

0.3180

0.0609

0.0891

0.1500

0.0000
621.9415
621.9415

0.0765

0.0327
633.5829
2024

3.3224

0.2967

0.4020

8.6000e-
004

0.0225

0.0124

0.0349

6.1100e-
003

0.0116

0.0177

0.0000

77.5195

0.0131

2.7800e-
003

78.6744
Maximum

3.3224

2.3539

2.7358

6.8900e-
003

0.3385

0.0947

0.4131

0.1360

0.0891

0.2055

0.0000
621.9415
621.9415

0.0765

0.0327
633.5829
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 3 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 279
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C) ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
Quarter
Start Date
End Date
Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1 6-1-2022
8-31-2022

0.9352

0.9352
2 9-1-2022
11-30-2022

0.7361

0.7361
3 12-1-2022
2-28-2023

0.6808

0.6808
4 3-1-2023
5-31-2023

0.6643

0.6643
5 6-1-2023
8-31-2023

0.6619

0.6619
6 9-1-2023
11-30-2023

0.6595

0.6595
7 12-1-2023
2-29-2024

0.7734

0.7734
8 3-1-2024
5-31-2024

3.0670

3.0670
Highest

3.0670

3.0670
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 4 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 280
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area

2.1758

4.0000e-
005

4.3300e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

8.4500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
003
Energy

0.0329

0.2995

0.2516

1.8000e-
003

0.0228

0.0000
712.7508
712.7508

0.0688

0.0136
718.5123
Mobile

1.5399

2.5764

13.6146

0.0318

3.1256

0.0287

3.1543

0.8365

0.0269

0.8634

0.0000
3,006.816
9 3,006.816
9 0.1639

0.1711
3,061.904
9 Waste

0.0000

89.2551

0.0000

89.2551

5.2748

0.0000
221.1258
Water

0.0000

26.6596

58.7492

85.4088

2.7477

0.0658
173.7119
Total

3.7487

2.8759

13.8705

0.0336

3.1256

0.0514

3.1771

0.8365

0.0497

0.8862
115.9148
3,778.325
4 3,894.240
2 8.2553

0.2505
4,175.264
0 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 5 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 281
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area

2.0378

4.0000e-
005

4.3300e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

8.4500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
003
Energy

0.0329

0.2995

0.2516

1.8000e-
003

0.0228

0.0000
712.7508
712.7508

0.0688

0.0136
718.5123
Mobile

1.5399

2.5764

13.6146

0.0318

3.1256

0.0287

3.1543

0.8365

0.0269

0.8634

0.0000
3,006.816
9 3,006.816
9 0.1639

0.1711
3,061.904
9 Waste

0.0000

89.2551

0.0000

89.2551

5.2748

0.0000
221.1258
Water

0.0000

26.6596

58.7492

85.4088

2.7477

0.0658
173.7119
Total

3.6106

2.8759

13.8705

0.0336

3.1256

0.0514

3.1771

0.8365

0.0497

0.8862
115.9148
3,778.325
4 3,894.240
2 8.2553

0.2505
4,175.264
0 Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Demolition
Demolition
6/1/2022
5/31/2022
5 0
2 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
6/29/2022
7/12/2022
5 10
3 Grading
Grading
7/13/2022
8/30/2022
5 35
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

3.68 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 6 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 282
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C) 4 Building Construction
Building Construction
8/31/2022
1/30/2024
5 370
5 Paving
Paving
1/31/2024
2/27/2024
5 20
6 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
2/28/2024
3/26/2024
5 20
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 8.00
81 0.73
Building Construction
Cranes
1 7.00
231

0.29 Demolition
Excavators
3 8.00
158

0.38 Grading
Excavators
2 8.00
158

0.38 Building Construction
Forklifts
3 8.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 Paving
Pavers
2 8.00
130

0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
2 8.00
132

0.36 Paving
Rollers
2 8.00
80 0.38
Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
2 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Scrapers
2 8.00
367

0.48 Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 7.00
97 0.37
Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 8.00
97 0.37
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 709,266; Non-Residential Outdoor: 236,422; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating
–
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 105
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 7 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 283
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0000

0.0000
Total

0.0000

0.0000
Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
4 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Welders
1 8.00
46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition
6 15.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
7 18.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
8 20.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
9 151.00

77.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
6 15.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 30.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 8 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 284
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0000

0.0000
Total

0.0000

0.0000
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0000

0.0000
Total

0.0000

0.0000
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 9 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 285
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.0000

0.0000
Total

0.0000

0.0000
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.0983

0.0000

0.0983

0.0505

0.0000

0.0505

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0159

0.1654

0.0985

1.9000e-
004

8.0600e-
003

7.4200e-
003

0.0000

16.7197

5.4100e-
003

0.0000

16.8549
Total

0.0159

0.1654

0.0985

1.9000e-
004

0.0983

8.0600e-
003

0.1064

0.0505

7.4200e-
003

0.0579

0.0000

16.7197

5.4100e-
003

0.0000

16.8549
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 10 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 286
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

3.1000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

2.4500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
004

0.0000

7.2000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

0.5984

2.0000e-
005

0.6044
Total

3.1000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

2.4500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
004

0.0000

7.2000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

0.5984

2.0000e-
005

0.6044
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.0983

0.0000

0.0983

0.0505

0.0000

0.0505

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0159

0.1654

0.0985

1.9000e-
004

8.0600e-
003

7.4200e-
003

0.0000

16.7197

5.4100e-
003

0.0000

16.8549
Total

0.0159

0.1654

0.0985

1.9000e-
004

0.0983

8.0600e-
003

0.1064

0.0505

7.4200e-
003

0.0579

0.0000

16.7197

5.4100e-
003

0.0000

16.8549
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 11 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 287
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

3.1000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

2.4500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
004

0.0000

7.2000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

0.5984

2.0000e-
005

0.6044
Total

3.1000e-
004

2.2000e-
004

2.4500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
004

0.0000

7.2000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

1.9000e-
004

0.0000

0.5984

2.0000e-
005

0.6044
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.1611

0.0000

0.1611

0.0639

0.0000

0.0639

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0634

0.6798

0.5082

1.0900e-
003

0.0286

0.0263

0.0000

95.4356

0.0309

0.0000

96.2072
Total

0.0634

0.6798

0.5082

1.0900e-
003

0.1611

0.0286

0.1897

0.0639

0.0263

0.0903

0.0000

95.4356

0.0309

0.0000

96.2072
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 12 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 288
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.2000e-
003

8.4000e-
004

9.5400e-
003

3.0000e-
005

2.8000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8100e-
003

7.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.3270

8.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

2.3504
Total

1.2000e-
003

8.4000e-
004

9.5400e-
003

3.0000e-
005

2.8000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8100e-
003

7.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.3270

8.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

2.3504
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.1611

0.0000

0.1611

0.0639

0.0000

0.0639

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0634

0.6798

0.5082

1.0900e-
003

0.0286

0.0263

0.0000

95.4354

0.0309

0.0000

96.2071
Total

0.0634

0.6798

0.5082

1.0900e-
003

0.1611

0.0286

0.1897

0.0639

0.0263

0.0903

0.0000

95.4354

0.0309

0.0000

96.2071
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 13 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 289
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.2000e-
003

8.4000e-
004

9.5400e-
003

3.0000e-
005

2.8000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8100e-
003

7.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.3270

8.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

2.3504
Total

1.2000e-
003

8.4000e-
004

9.5400e-
003

3.0000e-
005

2.8000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8100e-
003

7.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.6000e-
004

0.0000

2.3270

8.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

2.3504
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0751

0.6871

0.7200

1.1900e-
003

0.0356

0.0335

0.0000
101.9591
101.9591

0.0244

0.0000
102.5698
Total

0.0751

0.6871

0.7200

1.1900e-
003

0.0356

0.0335

0.0000
101.9591
101.9591

0.0244

0.0000
102.5698
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 14 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 290
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

7.3300e-
003

0.1860

0.0535

7.1000e-
004

0.0225

2.0700e-
003

0.0245

6.4900e-
003

1.9800e-
003

8.4700e-
003

0.0000

68.0322

4.4000e-
004

0.0102

71.0826
Worker

0.0227

0.0160

0.1812

4.8000e-
004

0.0531

3.0000e-
004

0.0534

0.0141

2.8000e-
004

0.0144

0.0000

44.1739

1.5000e-
003

1.3600e-
003

44.6179
Total

0.0301

0.2020

0.2347

1.1900e-
003

0.0756

2.3700e-
003

0.0780

0.0206

2.2600e-
003

0.0229

0.0000
112.2060
112.2060

1.9400e-
003

0.0116
115.7005
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0751

0.6871

0.7200

1.1900e-
003

0.0356

0.0335

0.0000
101.9590
101.9590

0.0244

0.0000
102.5697
Total

0.0751

0.6871

0.7200

1.1900e-
003

0.0356

0.0335

0.0000
101.9590
101.9590

0.0244

0.0000
102.5697
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 15 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 291
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

7.3300e-
003

0.1860

0.0535

7.1000e-
004

0.0225

2.0700e-
003

0.0245

6.4900e-
003

1.9800e-
003

8.4700e-
003

0.0000

68.0322

4.4000e-
004

0.0102

71.0826
Worker

0.0227

0.0160

0.1812

4.8000e-
004

0.0531

3.0000e-
004

0.0534

0.0141

2.8000e-
004

0.0144

0.0000

44.1739

1.5000e-
003

1.3600e-
003

44.6179
Total

0.0301

0.2020

0.2347

1.1900e-
003

0.0756

2.3700e-
003

0.0780

0.0206

2.2600e-
003

0.0229

0.0000
112.2060
112.2060

1.9400e-
003

0.0116
115.7005
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.2045

1.8700

2.1117

3.5000e-
003

0.0910

0.0856

0.0000
301.3462
301.3462

0.0717

0.0000
303.1383
Total

0.2045

1.8700

2.1117

3.5000e-
003

0.0910

0.0856

0.0000
301.3462
301.3462

0.0717

0.0000
303.1383
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 16 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 292
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0110

0.4425

0.1355

2.0200e-
003

0.0664

2.8600e-
003

0.0692

0.0192

2.7400e-
003

0.0219

0.0000
193.5100
193.5100

8.3000e-
004

0.0290
202.1586
Worker

0.0616

0.0414

0.4885

1.3700e-
003

0.1569

8.3000e-
004

0.1578

0.0417

7.7000e-
004

0.0425

0.0000
127.0857
127.0857

3.9600e-
003

3.7000e-
003
128.2864
Total

0.0727

0.4838

0.6241

3.3900e-
003

0.2233

3.6900e-
003

0.2270

0.0609

3.5100e-
003

0.0644

0.0000
320.5957
320.5957

4.7900e-
003

0.0327
330.4450
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.2045

1.8700

2.1117

3.5000e-
003

0.0910

0.0856

0.0000
301.3458
301.3458

0.0717

0.0000
303.1380
Total

0.2045

1.8700

2.1117

3.5000e-
003

0.0910

0.0856

0.0000
301.3458
301.3458

0.0717

0.0000
303.1380
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 17 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 293
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0110

0.4425

0.1355

2.0200e-
003

0.0664

2.8600e-
003

0.0692

0.0192

2.7400e-
003

0.0219

0.0000
193.5100
193.5100

8.3000e-
004

0.0290
202.1586
Worker

0.0616

0.0414

0.4885

1.3700e-
003

0.1569

8.3000e-
004

0.1578

0.0417

7.7000e-
004

0.0425

0.0000
127.0857
127.0857

3.9600e-
003

3.7000e-
003
128.2864
Total

0.0727

0.4838

0.6241

3.3900e-
003

0.2233

3.6900e-
003

0.2270

0.0609

3.5100e-
003

0.0644

0.0000
320.5957
320.5957

4.7900e-
003

0.0327
330.4450
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0162

0.1479

0.1778

3.0000e-
004

6.7500e-
003

6.3500e-
003

0.0000

25.5034

6.0300e-
003

0.0000

25.6542
Total

0.0162

0.1479

0.1778

3.0000e-
004

6.7500e-
003

6.3500e-
003

0.0000

25.5034

6.0300e-
003

0.0000

25.6542
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 18 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 294
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

9.1000e-
004

0.0375

0.0112

1.7000e-
004

5.6200e-
003

2.4000e-
004

5.8600e-
003

1.6200e-
003

2.3000e-
004

1.8600e-
003

0.0000

16.1123

7.0000e-
005

2.4100e-
003

16.8320
Worker

4.8100e-
003

3.0800e-
003

0.0382

1.1000e-
004

0.0133

7.0000e-
005

0.0134

3.5300e-
003

6.0000e-
005

3.5900e-
003

0.0000

10.4838

3.0000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

10.5774
Total

5.7200e-
003

0.0406

0.0494

2.8000e-
004

0.0189

3.1000e-
004

0.0192

5.1500e-
003

2.9000e-
004

5.4500e-
003

0.0000

26.5961

3.7000e-
004

2.7000e-
003

27.4094
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0162

0.1479

0.1778

3.0000e-
004

6.7500e-
003

6.3500e-
003

0.0000

25.5034

6.0300e-
003

0.0000

25.6541
Total

0.0162

0.1479

0.1778

3.0000e-
004

6.7500e-
003

6.3500e-
003

0.0000

25.5034

6.0300e-
003

0.0000

25.6541
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 19 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 295
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

9.1000e-
004

0.0375

0.0112

1.7000e-
004

5.6200e-
003

2.4000e-
004

5.8600e-
003

1.6200e-
003

2.3000e-
004

1.8600e-
003

0.0000

16.1123

7.0000e-
005

2.4100e-
003

16.8320
Worker

4.8100e-
003

3.0800e-
003

0.0382

1.1000e-
004

0.0133

7.0000e-
005

0.0134

3.5300e-
003

6.0000e-
005

3.5900e-
003

0.0000

10.4838

3.0000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

10.5774
Total

5.7200e-
003

0.0406

0.0494

2.8000e-
004

0.0189

3.1000e-
004

0.0192

5.1500e-
003

2.9000e-
004

5.4500e-
003

0.0000

26.5961

3.7000e-
004

2.7000e-
003

27.4094
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

9.8800e-
003

0.0953

0.1463

2.3000e-
004

4.6900e-
003

4.3100e-
003

0.0000

20.0265

6.4800e-
003

0.0000

20.1885
Paving

0.0000

0.0000
Total

9.8800e-
003

0.0953

0.1463

2.3000e-
004

4.6900e-
003

4.3100e-
003

0.0000

20.0265

6.4800e-
003

0.0000

20.1885
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 20 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 296
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.3000e-
004

2.8000e-
004

3.4500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.9468

3.0000e-
005

0.9552
Total

4.3000e-
004

2.8000e-
004

3.4500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.9468

3.0000e-
005

0.9552
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

9.8800e-
003

0.0953

0.1463

2.3000e-
004

4.6900e-
003

4.3100e-
003

0.0000

20.0265

6.4800e-
003

0.0000

20.1884
Paving

0.0000

0.0000
Total

9.8800e-
003

0.0953

0.1463

2.3000e-
004

4.6900e-
003

4.3100e-
003

0.0000

20.0265

6.4800e-
003

0.0000

20.1884
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 21 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 297
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.3000e-
004

2.8000e-
004

3.4500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.9468

3.0000e-
005

0.9552
Total

4.3000e-
004

2.8000e-
004

3.4500e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.2000e-
004

0.0000

0.9468

3.0000e-
005

0.9552
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

3.2875

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.8100e-
003

0.0122

0.0181

3.0000e-
005

6.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.5533

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.5569
Total

3.2893

0.0122

0.0181

3.0000e-
005

6.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.5533

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.5569
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 22 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 298
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

8.7000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

6.9000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.4000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.4100e-
003

6.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

6.5000e-
004

0.0000

1.8935

5.0000e-
005

1.9104
Total

8.7000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

6.9000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.4000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.4100e-
003

6.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

6.5000e-
004

0.0000

1.8935

5.0000e-
005

1.9104
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

3.2875

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

1.8100e-
003

0.0122

0.0181

3.0000e-
005

6.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.5533

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.5568
Total

3.2893

0.0122

0.0181

3.0000e-
005

6.1000e-
004

0.0000

2.5533

1.4000e-
004

0.0000

2.5568
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 23 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 299
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

8.7000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

6.9000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.4000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.4100e-
003

6.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

6.5000e-
004

0.0000

1.8935

5.0000e-
005

1.9104
Total

8.7000e-
004

5.6000e-
004

6.9000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.4000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

2.4100e-
003

6.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

6.5000e-
004

0.0000

1.8935

5.0000e-
005

1.9104
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 24 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 300
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

1.5399

2.5764

13.6146

0.0318

3.1256

0.0287

3.1543

0.8365

0.0269

0.8634

0.0000
3,006.816
9 3,006.816
9 0.1639

0.1711
3,061.904
9 Unmitigated

1.5399

2.5764

13.6146

0.0318

3.1256

0.0287

3.1543

0.8365

0.0269

0.8634

0.0000
3,006.816
9 3,006.816
9 0.1639

0.1711
3,061.904
9 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
General Office Building
4,605.07
1,044.89
330.96
8,330,408
8,330,408
Total
4,605.07
1,044.89
330.96
8,330,408
8,330,408
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
General Office Building

9.50 7.30

7.30 33.00

48.00 19.00
77 19
4 4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
General Office Building

0.517111

0.052324

0.170980

0.155671

0.027786

0.007423

0.013424

0.026160

0.000649

0.000313

0.023324

0.001439

0.003395
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 25 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 301
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000

0.0000
386.7437
386.7437

0.0626

7.5800e-
003
390.5680
Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000

0.0000
386.7437
386.7437

0.0626

7.5800e-
003
390.5680
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0329

0.2995

0.2516

1.8000e-
003

0.0228

0.0000
326.0071
326.0071

6.2500e-
003

5.9800e-
003
327.9444
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0329

0.2995

0.2516

1.8000e-
003

0.0228

0.0000
326.0071
326.0071

6.2500e-
003

5.9800e-
003
327.9444

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Install High Efficiency Lighting
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 26 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 302
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
General Office
Building

6.10914e
+006

0.0329

0.2995

0.2516

1.8000e-
003

0.0228

0.0000
326.0071
326.0071

6.2500e-
003

5.9800e-
003
327.9444
Total

0.0329

0.2995

0.2516

1.8000e-
003

0.0228

0.0000
326.0071
326.0071

6.2500e-
003

5.9800e-
003
327.9444
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
General Office
Building

6.10914e
+006

0.0329

0.2995

0.2516

1.8000e-
003

0.0228

0.0000
326.0071
326.0071

6.2500e-
003

5.9800e-
003
327.9444
Total

0.0329

0.2995

0.2516

1.8000e-
003

0.0228

0.0000
326.0071
326.0071

6.2500e-
003

5.9800e-
003
327.9444
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 27 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 303
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C) Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Interior

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
General Office
Building

4.17994e
+006
386.7437

0.0626

7.5800e-
003
390.5680
Total
386.7437

0.0626

7.5800e-
003
390.5680
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
General Office
Building

4.17994e
+006
386.7437

0.0626

7.5800e-
003
390.5680
Total
386.7437

0.0626

7.5800e-
003
390.5680
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 28 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 304
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C) Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Exterior
No Hearths Installed
Use Low VOC Cleaning Supplies
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

2.0378

4.0000e-
005

4.3300e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

8.4500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
003
Unmitigated

2.1758

4.0000e-
005

4.3300e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

8.4500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 29 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 305
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.3287

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

1.8467

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

4.0000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

4.3300e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

8.4500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
003
Total

2.1758

4.0000e-
005

4.3300e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

8.4500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
003
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 30 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 306
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.3287

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

1.7086

0.0000

0.0000
Landscaping

4.0000e-
004

4.0000e-
005

4.3300e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

8.4500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
003
Total

2.0378

4.0000e-
005

4.3300e-
003

0.0000

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

8.4500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

0.0000

9.0000e-
003
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 31 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 307
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C) Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated

85.4088

2.7477

0.0658
173.7119
Unmitigated

85.4088

2.7477

0.0658
173.7119

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
General Office
Building

84.0325 /

51.5038

85.4088

2.7477

0.0658
173.7119
Total

85.4088

2.7477

0.0658
173.7119
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 32 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 308
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
General Office
Building

84.0325 /

51.5038

85.4088

2.7477

0.0658
173.7119
Total

85.4088

2.7477

0.0658
173.7119
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated

89.2551

5.2748

0.0000
221.1258
Unmitigated

89.2551

5.2748

0.0000
221.1258
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 33 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 309
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
General Office
Building
439.7

89.2551

5.2748

0.0000
221.1258
Total

89.2551

5.2748

0.0000
221.1258
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
General Office
Building
439.7

89.2551

5.2748

0.0000
221.1258
Total

89.2551

5.2748

0.0000
221.1258
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 34 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 310
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

11.0 Vegetation

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 2/1/2022 3:02 PM

Page 35 of 35 ends

Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use - San Joaquin Valley Air Basin, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 311
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
MARCH 2022
CITY OF HANFORD – Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use | 151 Appendix B: CHRIS Search Records
Prepared by SSJIC dated January 18, 2022.

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 312
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

To: Shin Tu Record Search 22-004
Precision Civil Engineering, Inc.
1234 O Street
Fresno, CA 93721

Date: January 18, 2022

Re: City of Hanford – Lassen Rezone

County: Kings

Map(s): Hanford 7.5’

CULTURAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCH

The California O ffice of Historic Preservation (OHP) contracts with the California Historical R esources Information System’s (CHRIS) regional Information Centers (ICs) to maintain information in the CHRIS inventory and make it available to local, state, and federal agencies, cultural resource professionals, Native American tribes, res earchers, and t he public. Re commendations mad e by IC coordina tors or their staff regarding the interpretation and application of this information are advisory only. Such recommendations do not necessarily represent the eval uation or opinion of the State Hi storic Preserva tion Officer in carrying out t he O HP’s regulatory authority under federal and state law.

The following are the results of a search of the cultural resource files at the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center. These files include kno wn and recorded cultural resources sites, inventory and excavation reports filed with this office, a nd resources listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the OHP Built Environment Resources Directory, California State His torical L andmarks, Calif ornia Register of Historical Resources, Calif ornia Inventory of Historic Resources, and California Points of Historical Interest. Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been sub mitted to the OHP are availa ble via this rec ords search. Addi tional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area.

PRIOR CULTURAL RESOURCE STUDIES CONDUCTED WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND THE ONE-HALF MILE RADIUS

According to the information in our files, there have been no previous cultural resource studies in the project area. There have been eight studies conducted within the one-half mile radius, KI-00028, 00108, 00109, 00110, 00111, 00210, 00229, and 00289.

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 313
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C) R
ecord Search 22-004

KNOWN/RECORDED CULTURAL RESOURCES WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND THE ONE-HALF MILE RADIUS There is one r ecorded res ource wit hin th e pr oject area, P- 16-00246. It is not known if any ot her resource exists there. There are eight recorded res ources within the one -half mile radius , P -16-000122, 000130, 000131, 000132, 000133, 000289, 000290, and 000476. These resources prima rily consist of historic era buildings. They also include an historic era railroad, an historic era canal, and an historic era trash scatter.

Resources P-16-000289 (Taoist Temple , located at 12 China Alley) and P-16-000290 (Hanford Carnegie Library, located at 10 9 E. 8 th Street) have been given National Register status code s of 1 S, indicating they are listed in the National Register of Historic Places by the Keeper. They are also listed in the California Reg ister of Historical Resources. Resource P-16-000246, People’s Ditch, has been given a National Register status code of 2S2, indicat ing it has been determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places by a consensus through the Section 106 process. It is also listed in the California Register of Historical Resources.

There are no other recorded cultural resources within the project area or radius that are listed in the National Register o f Hi storic Places , the Ca lifornia Reg ister of H istorical R esources, t he Cali fornia Poin ts o f Hi storical Interest, California Inventory of Historic Resources, or the California State Historic Landmarks.

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
We understand this project site includes existing structures . No information was given as to the age of the existing structures or the nature of the project. According to our records, no structures listed at the provided address have ever been recorded or evaluated for hist orical significance. Therefore, if this project will result in alteration or demolition of any existing structures more than 45 years old, then we recommend the structures first be recorded and evaluated for historical significance. If t he project will result in any ground disturbance activities on a ny undeveloped land, we recommend a qualified, professiona l consultant first conduct a field survey t o determine if any cultural resources are present. If ground disturbance will not take place on a ny vacant land and no structures more than 45 years old will be impacted, then no further cultural resource investigation is recommended at this time. However, if any cultural resources are unearthed during any ground disturbance a ctivities, all work must halt in the area of the find and a qualified, professional consultant should be called out to assess the findings and make the appropriate mitigation recommendations. A list of qualified consultants can be found at www.chrisinfo.org.

We also recommend that you contact the Native American Heritage Commission in Sacramento. They will p rovide you wi th a current li st of N ative American i ndividuals/organizations that can ass ist yo u wi th information regarding cultural resources that may not be included in the CHRIS Inventory and that may be of concern to the Native group s in the area. The Commission can consult their "Sacred Lands Inventory" file to determine what sacred resources, if any, exist within this project area and the way in which these resources might be ma naged. Fina lly, pl ease c onsult wi th t he lead age ncy on th is projec t t o deter mine if any ot her cultural re source inv estigation is r equired. If you ne ed a ny additional in formation or have a ny questi ons or concerns, please contact our office at (661) 654-2289.

By:

Ce
leste M. Thomson, Coordinator Date: January 18, 2022
P
lease note that invoices for Information Center services will be sent under separate cover from the California State University, Bakersfield Accounting Office.

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 314
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
MARCH 2022
CITY OF HANFORD – Lassen Drive Corridor Mixed Use | 152 Appendix C: Early Consultation Letters
Received by the City of Hanford.

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 315
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” DISTRICT 6 OFFICE
1352 WEST OLIVE AVENUE |P.O. BOX 12616 |FRESNO, CA 93778-2616 (559) 981-7373 | FAX (559) 488-4195 | TTY 711
www.dot.ca.gov

October 4, 2021
06-KIN-198-0000001062
GPA #2021-01 RZ#2021-09

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CITY OF HANFORD

Sent via email

Gabrielle Meyers
Community Development-Planning Division
315-321 North Douty Street
Hanford, CA 93230

Dear Gabrielle Meyers:

Thank you for the opportunity to review the General Plan Amendment and Rezone at four different locations. The Amendment No. 2021-01 A requests to change the current designation of 1.04 acres of Downtown Mixed-Use to Service Commercial. The Amendment No. 2021-01 B requests to change the current designation of 1.45 acres of Neighborhood Mixed Use to Regional Commercial. The Amendment No. 2021-01C is to change the current designation of 28 acres of Medium-Density Residential to Corridor Mixed Use. The Amendment No. 2021-01 D is to change the 2.06 acres of Corridor Mixed Use to Public Utility. All four rezones are considered infill development and are located in the City of Hanford, in Kings County.

The mission of Caltrans is to provide a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system to enhance California’s economy and livability. The Local Development ‐Intergovernmental Review (LD‐IGR) Program reviews land use projects and plans through the lenses of our mission and state planning priorities of infill, conservation, and travel‐efficient development. To ensure a safe and efficient transportation system, we encourage early consultation and coordination with local jurisdictions and project proponents on all development projects that utilize the multimodal transportation network.

Caltrans provides the following comments consistent with the State’s smart mobility goals that support a vibrant economy and sustainable communities:

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 316
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C) Gabrielle Meyers
October 4, 2021

Page 2 ends

“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment”

1. C
altrans recommends that the future site plans for any of the proposed development be submitted to Caltrans for review when the plans are available. If the City of Hanford requires the Project to conduct a Traffic Impact Study, Caltrans would like the opportunity to review and comment on the Scope of Work.

2. I
t is recommended that the City and Kings County should consider the importance of developing a traffic impact fee program to fund future improvements to local and State facilities driven by the continuous and accumulated impacts of development in the region. Caltrans, in the past, has partnered with the City as well as the County on various improvement projects on SR 198 and will continue to partner with the City future need project in the area.

3. G
iven that the future development may attract regional traffic, Caltrans recommends the project proponents(s) conduct a vehicle-miles traveled (VMT) study once development is proposed. In the absence of a local agency VMT guideline, the preparer should refer to the Caltrans Vehicle Miles Traveled-Focused Transportation Impact Study Guide, dated May 20, 2020. Improvements for existing/future bike and pedestrian facilities on roads in the vicinity of the Project and connectivity between home to work/home to shops should be considered and included in the VMT mitigation plan.

4. Alt
ernative transportation policies should be applied to the development. An assessment of multi-modal facilities should be conducted to develop an integrated multi-modal transportation system to serve and help alleviate traffic congestion caused by the project and related development in this area of the City. The assessment may include pedestrian walkways linking this proposal to an internal project area walkway, transit facilities, as well as other walkways in the surrounding area.

If you have any further questions, please contact Nicholas Isla at (559) 981-7373 or email [email protected].

Sincerely,
DAVID PADILLA, Branch Chief
Transportation Planning – North
Signing on Behalf of:

Edgar Hernandez, Associate Transportation Planner
Transportation Planning – North

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 317
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C) Hello Gabrielle,

Attached is the signed request for comments for the General Plan Amendment No. 2021-01 (Part A-D), Rezone No. 2021-09 – 2021-12, and Associated Entitlements.

At this time our department has no comments for the proposed rezoning or amendments to the general plan; however, regarding the SPR 2021-05 (Holiday Inn Express), our department would like to include the following comments:

1. If service of a continental breakfast or other meal prep area is proposed, the facility will need to obtain an annual food vending permit from our department. All food service equipment must be new, commercial grade, and approved for food service by an independent testing agency. A pre-construction plan check of the food service area may also be required. Please contact our office at 559-584-1411 for additional information prior to construction.

2. The applicant must submit to our department 3 sets of complete construction plans for the swimming pool and/or spa to be reviewed for compliance with applicable California and local codes and regulations. No construction of the pool or spa is permitted without prior written approval from our department. To access the plan check application visit our website at http://www.countyofkings.com/Health/ehs/forms.

3. Annual fees to operate a public swimming pool and spa, continental breakfast area and operation of the hotel/motel are required by this department. If you have any questions, please contact us at 559-584-14711.

Thank you for this opportunity and please let me know if you have any questions.

Liliana Stransky, MPA, REHS
Environmental Health Officer
Kings County Department of Public Health
330 Campus Drive | Hanford, CA | 93230
Phone: (559)852-2628 | Fax: (559)584-6040
www.countyofkings.com/ehs

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information for the use of the designated recipients. If you are not the intended recipient, (or authorized to receive for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 318
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C) review, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of it or its contents is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please destroy all copies of this communication and any attachments and contact the sender by reply e-mail or telephone 559.584.1411.

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 319
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION

Page 1 of 2 ends

October 25, 2021

Gabrielle de Silva Myers
City of Hanford

Via Email to: [email protected]

Re: Native American Consultation, Pursuant to Senate Bill 18, Government Code §65352.3 and §65352.4, General Plan Amendment No. 2021-01 (Part A through D); Rezone No. 2021-09, -10, - 11, and -12 Project, Kings County

Dear Ms. Myers:

Attached is a consultation list of tribes with traditional lands or cultural places located within the boundaries of the above referenced counties.

Government Code §65352.3 and §65352.4 require local governments to consult with California Native American tribes identified by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for the purpose of avoiding, protecting, and/or mitigating impacts to cultural places when creating or amending General Plans, Specific Plans and Community Plans.

The law does not preclude initiating consultation with the tribes that are culturally and traditionally affiliated within your jurisdiction. The NAHC believes that this is the best practice to ensure that tribes are consulted commensurate with the intent of the law.

The NAHC also believes that agencies should also include with their notification letters, information regarding any cultural resources assessment that has been completed on the area of potential effect (APE), such as:

1. The results of any record search that may have been conducted at an Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), including, but not limited to:

• A listing of any and all known cultural resources that have already been recorded or are adjacent to the APE, such as known archaeological sites; • Copies of any and all cultural resource records and study reports that may have been provided by the Information Center as part of the records search response;
• Whether the records search indicates a low, moderate or high probability that unrecorded cultural resources are located in the APE; and • If a survey is recommended by the Information Center to determine whether previously unrecorded cultural resources are present.

2. The results of any archaeological inventory survey that was conducted, including:

• Any report that may contain site forms, site significance, and suggested mitigation measures.

CHAIRPERSON
Laura Miranda
Luiseño

VICE CHAIRPERSON
Reginald Pagaling
Chumash

SECRETARY
Merri Lopez-Keifer
Luiseño

PARLIAMENTARIAN
Russell Attebery
Karuk

COMMISSIONER
William Mungary
Paiute/White Mountain
Apache

COMMISSIONER
Julie Tumamait-
Stenslie
Chumash

COMMISSIONER
[Vacant]

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
Christina Snider
Pomo

NAHC HEADQUARTERS
1550 Harbor Boulevard
Suite 100
West Sacramento,
California 95691
(916) 373-3710
[email protected]
NAHC.ca.gov

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 320
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

Page 2 of 2 ends

All information regarding site locations, Native American human remains, and associated funerary objects should be in a separate confidential addendum, and not be made available for public disclosure in accordance with Government Code §6254.10.

3. The result of the Sacred Lands File (SLF) check conducted through the Native American Heritage Commission.

The request form can be found at http://nahc.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Local-Government- Tribal-Consultation-List-Request-Form-Update.pdf.

4. Any ethnographic studies conducted for any area including all or part of the APE; and

5. Any geotechnical reports regarding all or part of the APE.

Lead agencies should be aware that records maintained by the NAHC and CHRIS are not exhaustive. A tribe may be the only source of information regarding the existence of a tribal cultural resource.

This information will aid tribes in determining whether to request formal consultation. In the event, that they do, having the information beforehand will help to facilitate the consultation process.

If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify the NAHC. With your assistance, we are able to assure that our consultation list remains current.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at my email address:

[email protected].

Sincerely,

Andrew Green
Cultural Resources Analyst

Attachment

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 321
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C) From: Samantha McCarty
To: Gabrielle Myers
Cc: Shana Powers; Maria Gonzales; William K. Barrios; Paige Berggren; Damion Cuara Subject: RE: General Plan Amendment No. 2021-01 (Part A-D), Rezone No. 2021-09 - 2021-12, and Associated Entitlements
Date: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 2:20:02 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders.

Dear Gabrielle,

I apologize, I realize I made a mistake in my response to you. This email will have the correct response.

Thank you for contacting the Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi-Yokut Tribe regarding: General Plan Amendment No. 2021-01 (Part A-D), Rezone No. 2021-09 - 2021-12, and Associated Entitlements.

The Tribe has concerns with parts A and B and is requesting to have monitors on site for all future development. If you have any questions, comments, and or concerns please contact myself or the Santa Rosa Rancheria Cultural Department. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Samantha McCarty
Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi-Yokut Tribe
Cultural Specialist ll
[email protected]
Office: (559) 924-1278 x 4091
Cell: (559) 633-6640

*PLEASE KEEP ALL CULTURAL STAFF IN EMAILS UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE

From: Samantha McCarty
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2021 2:14 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Shana Powers <[email protected]>; Maria Gonzales <mgonzales@tachi-yokut- nsn.gov>; William K. Barrios <[email protected]>; Paige Berggren <pberggren@tachi- yokut-nsn.gov>; Damion Cuara <[email protected]> Subject: General Plan Amendment No. 2021-01 (Part A-D), Rezone No. 2021-09 - 2021-12, and Associated Entitlements

Dear Gabrielle,

Thank you for contacting the Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi-Yokut Tribe regarding: General Plan Amendment No. 2021-01 (Part A-D), Rezone No. 2021-09 - 2021-12, and Associated Entitlements.

The Tribe has concerns with parts A and B and is requesting to have monitors on site for all ground

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 322
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C) disturbance related to the project. If you have any questions, comments, and or concerns please contact myself or the Santa Rosa Rancheria Cultural Department. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Samantha McCarty
Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi-Yokut Tribe
Cultural Specialist ll
[email protected]
Office: (559) 924-1278 x 4091
Cell: (559) 633-6640

*PLEASE KEEP ALL CULTURAL STAFF IN EMAILS UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 323
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

Plan Review Team
Land Management
[email protected]

6111 Bollinger Canyon Road 3370A
San Ramon, CA 94583

PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 1
September 9, 2021

Gabrielle Myers
City of Hanford
317 N Douty St
Hanford, CA 93230

Ref: Gas and Electric Transmission and Distribution

Dear Gabrielle Myers,

Thank you for submitting the Site Plan Review No 2021-22 plans for our review. PG&E will review the submitted plans in relationship to any existing Gas and Electric facilities within the project area. If the proposed project is adjacent/or within PG&E owned property and/or easements, we will be working with you to ensure compatible uses and activities near our facilities.

Attached you will find information and requirements as it relates to Gas facilities (Attachment 1) and Electric facilities (Attachment 2). Please review these in detail, as it is critical to ensure your safety and to protect PG&E’s facilities and its existing rights.

Below is additional information for your review:

1. This plan review process does not replace the application process for PG&E gas or electric service your project may require. For these requests, please continue to work with PG&E Service Planning:
https://www.pge.com/en_US/business/services/building-
and-renovation/overview/overview.page.

2. If the project being submitted is part of a larger project, please include the entire scope of your project, and not just a portion of it. PG&E’s facilities are to be incorporated within any CEQA document. PG&E needs to verify that the CEQA document will identify any required future PG&E services.

3. An engineering deposit may be required to review plans for a project depending on the size, scope, and location of the project and as it relates to any rearrangement or new installation of PG&E facilities.

Any proposed uses within the PG&E fee strip and/or easement, may include a California Public Utility Commission (CPUC) Section 851 filing. This requires the CPUC to render approval for a conveyance of rights for specific uses on PG&E’s fee strip or easement. PG&E will advise if the necessity to incorporate a CPUC Section 851filing is required.

This letter does not constitute PG&E’s consent to use any portion of its easement for any purpose not previously conveyed. PG&E will provide a project specific response as required.

Sincerely,

Plan Review Team
Land Management

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 324
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 2
Attachment 1 – Gas Facilities

There could be gas transmission pipelines in this area which would be considered critical facilities for PG&E and a high priority subsurface installation under California law. Care must be taken to ensure safety and accessibility. So, please ensure that if PG&E approves work near gas transmission pipelines it is done in adherence with the below stipulations. Additionally, the following link provides additional information regarding legal requirements under California excavation laws: https://www.usanorth811.org/images/pdfs/CA-LAW-2018.pdf

1. Standby Inspection: A PG&E Gas Transmission Standby Inspector must be present during any demolition or construction activity that comes within 10 feet of the gas pipeline. This includes all grading, trenching, substructure depth verifications (potholes), asphalt or concrete demolition/removal, removal of trees, signs, light poles, etc. This inspection can be coordinated through the Underground Service Alert (USA) service at 811. A minimum notice of 48 hours is required. Ensure the USA markings and notifications are maintained throughout the duration of your work.

2. Access: At any time, PG&E may need to access, excavate, and perform work on the gas pipeline. Any construction equipment, materials, or spoils may need to be removed upon notice.

Any temporary construction fencing installed within PG&E’s easement would also need to be capable of being removed at any time upon notice. Any plans to cut temporary slopes exceeding a 1:4 grade within 10 feet of a gas transmission pipeline need to be approved by PG&E Pipeline Services in writing PRIOR to performing the work.

3. Wheel Loads: To prevent damage to the buried gas pipeline, there are weight limits that must be enforced whenever any equipment gets within 10 feet of traversing the pipe.

Ensure a list of the axle weights of all equipment being used is available for PG&E’s Standby Inspector. To confirm the depth of cover, the pipeline may need to be potholed by hand in a few areas.

Due to the complex variability of tracked equipment, vibratory compaction equipment, and cranes, PG&E must evaluate those items on a case-by-case basis prior to use over the gas pipeline (provide a list of any proposed equipment of this type noting model numbers and specific attachments).

No equipment may be set up over the gas pipeline while operating. Ensure crane outriggers are at least 10 feet from the centerline of the gas pipeline. Transport trucks must not be parked over the gas pipeline while being loaded or unloaded.

4. Grading: PG&E requires a minimum of 36 inches of cover over gas pipelines (or existing grade if less) and a maximum of 7 feet of cover at all locations. The graded surface cannot exceed a cross slope of 1:4.

5. Excavating: Any digging within 2 feet of a gas pipeline must be dug by hand. Note that while the minimum clearance is only 12 inches, any excavation work within 24 inches of the edge of a pipeline must be done with hand tools. So to avoid having to dig a trench entirely with hand tools, the edge of the trench must be over 24 inches away. (Doing the math for a 24 inch

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 325
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 3
wide trench being dug along a 36 inch pipeline, the centerline of the trench would need to be at least 54 inches [24/2 + 24 + 36/2 = 54] away, or be entirely dug by hand.)

Water jetting to assist vacuum excavating must be limited to 1000 psig and directed at a 40° angle to the pipe. All pile driving must be kept a minimum of 3 feet away.

Any plans to expose and support a PG&E gas transmission pipeline across an open excavation need to be approved by PG&E Pipeline Services in writing PRIOR to performing the work.

6. Boring/Trenchless Installations: PG&E Pipeline Services must review and approve all plans to bore across or parallel to (within 10 feet) a gas transmission pipeline. There are stringent criteria to pothole the gas transmission facility at regular intervals for all parallel bore installations.

For bore paths that cross gas transmission pipelines perpendicularly, the pipeline must be potholed a minimum of 2 feet in the horizontal direction of the bore path and a minimum of 12 inches in the vertical direction from the bottom of the pipe with minimum clearances measured from the edge of the pipe in both directions. Standby personnel must watch the locator trace (and every ream pass) the path of the bore as it approaches the pipeline and visually monitor the pothole (with the exposed transmission pipe) as the bore traverses the pipeline to ensure adequate clearance with the pipeline. The pothole width must account for the inaccuracy of the locating equipment.

7. Substructures: All utility crossings of a gas pipeline should be made as close to perpendicular as feasible (90° +/- 15°). All utility lines crossing the gas pipeline must have a minimum of 12 inches of separation from the gas pipeline. Parallel utilities, pole bases, water line ‘kicker blocks’, storm drain inlets, water meters, valves, back pressure devices or other utility substructures are not allowed in the PG&E gas pipeline easement.

If previously retired PG&E facilities are in conflict with proposed substructures, PG&E must verify they are safe prior to removal. This includes verification testing of the contents of the facilities, as well as environmental testing of the coating and internal surfaces. Timelines for PG&E completion of this verification will vary depending on the type and location of facilities in conflict.

8. Structures: No structures are to be built within the PG&E gas pipeline easement. This includes buildings, retaining walls, fences, decks, patios, carports, septic tanks, storage sheds, tanks, loading ramps, or any structure that could limit PG&E’s ability to access its facilities.

9. Fencing: Permanent fencing is not allowed within PG&E easements except for perpendicular crossings which must include a 16 foot wide gate for vehicular access. Gates will be secured with PG&E corporation locks.

10. Landscaping: Landscaping must be designed to allow PG&E to access the pipeline for maintenance and not interfere with pipeline coatings or other cathodic protection systems. No trees, shrubs, brush, vines, and other vegetation may be planted within the easement area.

Only those plants, ground covers, grasses, flowers, and low-growing plants that grow unsupported to a maximum of four feet (4’) in height at maturity may be planted within the easement area.

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 326
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 4

11. Cathodic Protection: PG&E pipelines are protected from corrosion with an “Impressed Current” cathodic protection system. Any proposed facilities, such as metal conduit, pipes, service lines, ground rods, anodes, wires, etc. that might affect the pipeline cathodic protection system must be reviewed and approved by PG&E Corrosion Engineering.

12. Pipeline Marker Signs: PG&E needs to maintain pipeline marker signs for gas transmission pipelines in order to ensure public awareness of the presence of the pipelines.

With prior written approval from PG&E Pipeline Services, an existing PG&E pipeline marker sign that is in direct conflict with proposed developments may be temporarily relocated to accommodate construction work. The pipeline marker must be moved back once construction is complete.

13. PG&E is also the provider of distribution facilities throughout many of the areas within the state of California. Therefore, any plans that impact PG&E’s facilities must be reviewed and approved by PG&E to ensure that no impact occurs which may endanger the safe operation of its facilities.

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 327
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 5

Attachment 2 – Electric Facilities

It is PG&E’s policy to permit certain uses on a case by case basis within its electric transmission fee strip(s) and/or easement(s) provided such uses and manner in which they are exercised, will not interfere with PG&E’s rights or endanger its facilities. Some examples/restrictions are as follows:

1. Buildings and Other Structures: No buildings or other structures including the foot print and eave of any buildings, swimming pools, wells or similar structures will be permitted within fee strip(s) and/or easement(s) areas. PG&E’s transmission easement shall be designated on subdivision/parcel maps as “RESTRICTED USE AREA – NO BUILDING.”

2. Grading: Cuts, trenches or excavations may not be made within 25 feet of our towers.

Developers must submit grading plans and site development plans (including geotechnical reports if applicable), signed and dated, for PG&E’s review. PG&E engineers must review grade changes in the vicinity of our towers. No fills will be allowed which would impair ground-to- conductor clearances. Towers shall not be left on mounds without adequate road access to base of tower or structure.

3. Fences: Walls, fences, and other structures must be installed at locations that do not affect the safe operation of PG&’s facilities. Heavy equipment access to our facilities must be maintained at all times. Metal fences are to be grounded to PG&E specifications. No wall, fence or other like structure is to be installed within 10 feet of tower footings and unrestricted access must be maintained from a tower structure to the nearest street. Walls, fences and other structures proposed along or within the fee strip(s) and/or easement(s) will require PG&E review; submit plans to PG&E Centralized Review Team for review and comment.

4. Landscaping: Vegetation may be allowed; subject to review of plans. On overhead electric transmission fee strip(s) and/or easement(s), trees and shrubs are limited to those varieties that do not exceed 15 feet in height at maturity. PG&E must have access to its facilities at all times, including access by heavy equipment. No planting is to occur within the footprint of the tower legs. Greenbelts are encouraged.

5. Reservoirs, Sumps, Drainage Basins, and Ponds: Prohibited within PG&E’s fee strip(s) and/or easement(s) for electric transmission lines.

6. Automobile Parking: Short term parking of movable passenger vehicles and light trucks (pickups, vans, etc.) is allowed. The lighting within these parking areas will need to be reviewed by PG&E; approval will be on a case by case basis. Heavy equipment access to PG&E facilities is to be maintained at all times. Parking is to clear PG&E structures by at least 10 feet.

Protection of PG&E facilities from vehicular traffic is to be provided at developer’s expense AND to PG&E specifications. Blocked-up vehicles are not allowed. Carports, canopies, or awnings are not allowed.

7. Storage of Flammable, Explosive or Corrosive Materials: There shall be no storage of fuel or combustibles and no fueling of vehicles within PG&E’s easement. No trash bins or incinerators are allowed.

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 328
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C)

PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 6

8. Streets and Roads: Access to facilities must be maintained at all times. Street lights may be allowed in the fee strip(s) and/or easement(s) but in all cases must be reviewed by PG&E for proper clearance. Roads and utilities should cross the transmission easement as nearly at right angles as possible. Road intersections will not be allowed within the transmission easement.

9. Pipelines: Pipelines may be allowed provided crossings are held to a minimum and to be as nearly perpendicular as possible. Pipelines within 25 feet of PG&E structures require review by PG&E. Sprinklers systems may be allowed; subject to review. Leach fields and septic tanks are not allowed. Construction plans must be submitted to PG&E for review and approval prior to the commencement of any construction.

10. Signs: Signs are not allowed except in rare cases subject to individual review by PG&E.

11. Recreation Areas: Playgrounds, parks, tennis courts, basketball courts, barbecue and light trucks (pickups, vans, etc.) may be allowed; subject to review of plans. Heavy equipment access to PG&E facilities is to be maintained at all times. Parking is to clear PG&E structures by at least 10 feet. Protection of PG&E facilities from vehicular traffic is to be provided at developer’s expense AND to PG&E specifications.

12. Construction Activity: Since construction activity will take place near PG&E’s overhead electric lines, please be advised it is the contractor’s responsibility to be aware of, and observe the minimum clearances for both workers and equipment operating near high voltage electric lines set out in the High-Voltage Electrical Safety Orders of the California Division of Industrial Safety (
https://www.dir.ca.gov/Title8/sb5g2.html), as well as any other safety regulations.

Contractors shall comply with California Public Utilities Commission General Order 95 (http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/gos/GO95/go_95_startup_page.html) and all other safety rules. No construction may occur within 25 feet of PG&E’s towers. All excavation activities may only commence after 811 protocols has been followed.

Contractor shall ensure the protection of PG&E’s towers and poles from vehicular damage by (installing protective barriers) Plans for protection barriers must be approved by PG&E prior to construction.

13. PG&E is also the owner of distribution facilities throughout many of the areas within the state of California. Therefore, any plans that impact PG&E’s facilities must be reviewed and approved by PG&E to ensure that no impact occurs that may endanger the safe and reliable operation of its facilities.

12.D.c
Packet Pg. 329
Attachment: Attachment 1 ISMND 2022-31 (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01 C) Kurt Lavenson & Lesly Avedisian
1842 Leimert Boulevard
Oakland, CA 94602
510-530-0970
October 26, 2022
Natalie Corral
City Clerk
City of Hanford
319 N. Douty Street
Hanford, CA 93230
via email to: [email protected]
RE: General Plan Amendment 2021-01C and Pre/Rezone 2021-11 Speciﬁcally parcels: 014-221-020 and 014-221-026
Dear Ms. Corral,
We are writing to provide our comments for the City Council Meeting meeting scheduled for November 1, 2022, speciﬁcally General Plan Amendment No. 2021-01C and the Pre- Zone/Rezone 2021-11. As long-time owners of land within the subject site (also known as a portion of Island #4 pending Annexation) we support and are strongly in favor of the proposed General Plan Amendment and the Rezoning.

We also support the General Plan Amendment and Pre/Rezoning for its effect on our neighbors who own adjacent parcels described in the hearing notice. It is important to us, and we think it is important to the larger community, that development in the pending Island #4 Annexation area be allowed and encouraged. The zoning change from Medium Density Residential (R-M) to Corridor Mixed Use (MX-C) will facilitate this.

The General Plan Amendment and Pre/Rezoning will alleviate a serious conﬂict with the Kings County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) that prohibits most forms of residential development. After the rezoning, the land could be developed into an array of mixed uses, including some speciﬁed residential uses, in combinations that satisfy the conditions of the ALUCP. That will provide the maximum beneﬁt to this growing area of the community and to the resurgence of commerce along E. Lacey Boulevard.

We thank you and the City Council members for your time and attention on these matters and we appreciate all of the efforts of the Planning Department to resolve the General Plan conﬂicts.

Sincerely,
Kurt Lavenson Lesly Avedisian

12.D.d
Packet Pg. 330
Attachment: Attachment 2 - Lavenson-Avedisian comments to City Council re Zoning Changes_10-26-2022_SIGNED (CD: Lassen GPA 2021-01

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 12/6/2022

AGENDA SECTION: E

SUBJECT:

Public Works: Approval of the Notice of Completion for the Civic Park Boring and Electrical Project and Authorization for the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest and file said Notice with the Kings County Recorder's Office.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council, by motion, approve a Notice of Completion for the Civic Park Boring and Electrical Project, and authorize the mayo r to execute and the City Clerk to attest and file said Notice with the Kings County Recorder¢s Office.

BACKGROUND:

On September 20, 2022 the Council awarded the Civic Park Boring & Electrical Project to Power Design Electric of Kingsburg CA.

On April 19, 2022, Council directed staff to move forward with the electrical infrastructure portion of the proposed project for the Civic Park promenade. This portion of the project was necessary to supply the electrical infrastructure to the chiller unit needed for the Winter Wonderland Ice Rink and to provide electrical service to various areas that are used for events in the Civic Park throughout the year.

The electrical infrastructure now provides an underground connection from the existing transformer, on the west side of the Courthouse, to the chiller unit location. This eliminated the need for extensive surface electrical cables, which pose safety and accessibility challenges for patrons.

There was (1) contract change order on this project that amounted to a net increase of $14,158.89 for a final contract price of $100,305.89, which will leave the remaining appropriation of $74,807.11 to be returned to the General Fund.

12.E
Packet Pg. 331
Added 1 #1/0 in 1 - 4” conduit system to ensure grounding is present in both conduits for the parallel system

Built a New Disconnect / Camlock Connection Box for termination point of the new wiring and conduits. Provide a 400amp non- fused disconnect. Fabricate a strengthening plate holding 8 Cam Lock Receptacles And install into the bottom side of the 400 amp disconnect. There will be 2a Phase, 2b Phase, 2c Phase and 2 grounding Cam Lock connectors for mating to the chiller provided by others

Provided N48 Christy Box Extension and Concrete Lids to work with 2 City provided N48 Pull Boxes.

FINANCIAL HISTORY:

SOURCE OF BUDGET FUNDING AMOUNT

Accumulated Capital Outlay $175,113

Total Budget Funding $175,113.00

CONSTRUCTION COST:

Original Contract - Total Bid Award $86,147.00 Contract Change Order No. 1 $14,158.89

Total Construction Cost $100,305.89
Balance (Credit) -$74,807.11

FISCAL IMPACT:

On August 16, 2022, Council approved appropriation of funds from the Accumulated Capital Outlay (ACO) Fund in the amount of $175,113. The proposed project utilized $96,147 of that amount. The remaining unused appropriations will be transferred back to the ACO Fund.

Attached is the Final Project Construction and Finance History Report for Council review.

ATTACHMENTS:

NOC - Recording Original PDF
NOC - Recording Original WORD
Final Project Construction and Finance History

12.E
Packet Pg. 332
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

CITY OF HANFORD

When recorded return to:

City Clerk
City of Hanford
315 North Douty Street
Hanford, California 93230-3951

G.C. 27361.3 - Fee NIL

NOTICE OF COMPLETION

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The work of Improvement is located: 400 N. Douty St. Hanford CA

2. The Improvement is particularly described as: Site Improvements / Upgrades

3. The date of completion of the work of Improvement: November 4, 2022

4. The Owner of the work of Improvement: City of Hanford.

5. The nature of the owner’s interest or estate: Fee Simple Title.

6. The name of the original contractor for the work of Improvement: Power Design Electric Incorporated

7. The surety for the work of Improvement: Granite Surety Insurance Company

8. All work for this project has been completed.

9. Accepted by minute action of the City Council of the City of Hanford on: December 6, 2022

I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Dated this 6th day of December 2022

BY: ________________________________________
Kalish Morrow, Mayor
City of Hanford, County of Kings, State of California

12.E.a
Packet Pg. 333
Attachment: NOC - Recording Original PDF (PW: NOC for Civic Park Boring and Electrical Project)

I, the undersigned, say:

I am the person who signed the foregoing notice. I have read the above notice and know its contents, and the facts stated therein are true of my own knowledge.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed at Hanford, California, this ____ day of ___________, 2022.

BY: ________________________________________
Kalish Morrow, Mayor
City of Hanford, County of Kings, State of California

Authority: Section 1181 Civil Code

12.E.a
Packet Pg. 334
Attachment: NOC - Recording Original PDF (PW: NOC for Civic Park Boring and Electrical Project) RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

CITY OF HANFORD

When recorded return to:

City Clerk
City of Hanford
315 North Douty Street
Hanford, California 93230-3951

G.C. 27361.3 - Fee NIL

NOTICE OF COMPLETION

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The work of Improvement is located: 400 N. Douty St. Hanford CA

2. The Improvement is particularly described as: Site Improvements / Upgrades

3. The date of completion of the work of Improvement: November 4, 2022

4. The Owner of the work of Improvement: City of Hanford.

5. The nature of the owner’s interest or estate: Fee Simple Title.

6. The name of the original contractor for the work of Improvement: Power Design Electric Incorporated

7. The surety for the work of Improvement: Granite Surety Insurance Company

8. All work for this project has been completed.

9. Accepted by minute action of the City Council of the City of Hanford on: December 6, 2022

I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Dated this 6th day of December 2022

BY: ________________________________________
Kalish Morrow, Mayor
City of Hanford, County of Kings, State of California

12.E.b
Packet Pg. 335
Attachment: NOC - Recording Original WORD (PW: NOC for Civic Park Boring and Electrical Project)

I, the undersigned, say:

I am the person who signed the foregoing notice. I have read the above n otice and know its contents, and the facts stated therein are true of my own knowledge.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed at Hanford, California, this ____ day of ___________, 2022.

BY: ________________________________________
Kalish Morrow, Mayor
City of Hanford, County of Kings, State of California

Authority: Section 1181 Civil Code

12.E.b
Packet Pg. 336
Attachment: NOC - Recording Original WORD (PW: NOC for Civic Park Boring and Electrical Project)

FINAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION AND FINANCE HISTORY
P
ROJECT: Civic Park Boring & Electrical Project
CONTRACTOR: Power Design Electric
P.O. Box 251
Kingsburg CA 93631
CO
NTRACT DATES: Council Award September 20, 2022
Bid Opening September 12, 2022
Contractor Started Work October 10, 2022
Contract Time of Completion October 31, 2022
Contractor Completed Work November 4, 2022
CO
NTRACT CHANGE ORDERS:

1. Contract Change Order No. 1:

Add 1 #1/0 in 1 - 4” conduit system to ensure grounding is present in both conduits for the parallel system
B
uild a New Disconnect / Camlock Connection Box for termination point of the new wiring and c
onduits. Provide a 400amp non- fused disconnect. Fabricate a strengthening plate holding 8 Cam Lock Receptacles And install into the bottom side of the 400 amp disconnect. There will be 2a P
hase, 2b Phase, 2c Phase and 2 grounding Cam Lock connectors for mating to the chiller provided by others
P
rovide N48 Christy Box Extension and Concrete Lids to work with 2 City provided N
48 Pull Boxes.

For a net Increase of $14,158.89
F
INANCIAL HISTORY:

OURCE OF BUDGET FUNDING AMOUNT
Accumulated Capital Outlay $175,113
T
otal Budget Funding $175,113.00
CO
NSTRUCTION COST:

Original Contract – Total Bid Award $86,147.00
Contract Change Order No. 1 $14,158.89

Total Construction Cost $100,305.89
Balance (Credit) -$74,807.11

12.E.c
Packet Pg. 337
Attachment: Final Project Construction and Finance History (PW: NOC for Civic Park Boring and Electrical Project)

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 12/6/2022

AGENDA SECTION: F

SUBJECT:

Public Works: Approval of the Notice of Completion for the Campus Drive Reconstruction Project and Authorization for the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest and file said Notice with the Kings County Recorder's Office.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council, by motion, approve a Notice of Completion for the Campus Drive Reconstruction Project, and authorize the mayor to execu te and the City Clerk to attest and file said Notice with the Kings County Recorder¢s Office.

BACKGROUND:

On June 21, 2022, the Council awarded the Campus Drive Reconstruction Project to MAC General Engineering of Exeter CA.

This project involved the resurfacing of street pavement within Campus Drive, from Lacey Boulevard to Greenfield Avenue. Improvements included recycling of existing pavement, adjusting manholes and gate valve covers, installation of accessibility ramps, asphalt concrete paving and restriping of the roadway.

Campus Drive is a two-lane collector street that provides access to a high school, the County Government Center, and the Youth Athletic Complex. Average daily traffic volume is approximately 5,000 vehicles per day. The existing roadway surface was deteriorating due to traffic loads and weather impacts and needed resurfacing.

This project has extended the useful life of the street by approximately 12-15 years.

There was (5) contract change orders on this project that amounted to a net increase of $7,920.14 to the contract amount. However, the total project cost came in $63,658.89 under budget.

12.F
Packet Pg. 338
FINANCIAL HISTORY:

SOURCE OF BUDGET FUNDING AMOUNT

Gas Tax Fund $500,000.00
TDA Transportation Fund $287,300.00

Total Budget Funding $787,300.00

CONSTRUCTION COST:

Original Contract - Total Bid Award $715,720.97 Contract Change Order No. 1 - 5 $7,920.14

Total Construction Cost $723,641.11
Balance (Credit) -$63,658.89

FISCAL IMPACT:

The FY 21/22 Gas Tax Fund provided $500,000.00 for this project including contingencies. An additional appropriation of $287,300 from the TDA Transportation Fund was required to fully fund this project. Attached is the Final Project Construction and Finance History Report for Council review.

ATTACHMENTS:

Final Project Construction and Finance History
NOC - Recording Original PDF
NOC - Recording Original WORD

12.F
Packet Pg. 339

FINAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION AND FINANCE HISTORY

PROJECT: Campus Drive Reconstruction: Lacey Boulevard to Greenfield Avenue CONTRACTOR: MAC General Engineering Inc.

P.O. Box 178
Exeter CA 93221

CONTRACT DATES: Council Award June 21, 2022
Bid Opening June 14, 2022
Contractor Started Work July 25, 2022
Contract Time of Completion September 8, 2022
Contractor Completed Work September 29, 2022

CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS:

1. Contract Change Order No. 1:

Secure median edges with base rock, place base rock and cold mix at the north end of the median section where it was shortened.

For a net increase of $3,361.63

2. Change Order No. 2:

Additional Traffic Control
For a net increase of $1,880.00

3. Change Order No. 3
Construct additional 72LF of C&G + Demo
For a net increase of $988.00

4. Change Order No. 4
Add Asphalt to grade to smooth transition into the Edison Vault For a net increase of $ 7,375.09

5. Change Order No. 5
Balance of Quantities
For a net decrease of -$5,684.58

FINANCIAL HISTORY:

SOURCE OF BUDGET FUNDING AMOUNT

Gas Tax Fund $500,000.00
TDA Transportation Fund $287,300.00

Total Budget Funding $787,300.00

CONSTRUCTION COST:

Original Contract – Total Bid Award $715,720.97 Contract Change Order No. 1 - 5 $7,920.14

Total Construction Cost $723,641.11
Balance (Credit) -$63,658.89

12.F.a
Packet Pg. 340
Attachment: Final Project Construction and Finance History (PW: NOC Campus Drive Resurfacing Project) RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

CITY OF HANFORD

When recorded return to:

City Clerk
City of Hanford
315 North Douty Street
Hanford, California 93230-3951

G.C. 27361.3 - Fee NIL

NOTICE OF COMPLETION

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The work of Improvement is located: Lacey Boulevard to Greenfield Avenue, Hanford Ca

2. The Improvement is particularly described as: Site Improvements & Pavement Resurfacing

3. The date of completion of the work of Improvement: September 29, 2022

4. The Owner of the work of Improvement: City of Hanford.

5. The nature of the owner’s interest or estate: Fee Simple Title.

6. The name of the original contractor for the work of Improvement: MAC General Engineering Inc.

7. The surety for the work of Improvement: Merchants Bonding Company (Mutual)

8. All work for this project has been completed.

9. Accepted by minute action of the City Council of the City of Hanford on: December 6, 2022

I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Dated this 6th day of December 2022

BY: ________________________________________
Kalish Morrow, Mayor
City of Hanford, County of Kings, State of California

12.F.b
Packet Pg. 341
Attachment: NOC - Recording Original PDF (PW: NOC Campus Drive Resurfacing Project)

I, the undersigned, say:

I am the person who signed the foregoing notice. I have read the above notice and know its contents, and the facts stated therein are true of my own knowledge.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed at Hanford, California, this ____ day of ___________, 2022.

BY: ________________________________________
Kalish Morrow, Mayor
City of Hanford, County of Kings, State of California

Authority: Section 1181 Civil Code

12.F.b
Packet Pg. 342
Attachment: NOC - Recording Original PDF (PW: NOC Campus Drive Resurfacing Project) RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

CITY OF HANFORD

When recorded return to:

City Clerk
City of Hanford
315 North Douty Street
Hanford, California 93230-3951

G.C. 27361.3 - Fee NIL

NOTICE OF COMPLETION

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The work of Improvement is located: Lacey Boulevard to Greenfield Avenue, Hanford Ca

2. The Improvement is particularly described as: Site Improvements & Pavement Resurfacing

3. The date of completion of the work of Improvement: September 29, 2022

4. The Owner of the work of Improvement: City of Hanford.

5. The nature of the owner’s interest or estate: Fee Simple Title.

6. The name of the original contractor for the work of Improvement: MAC General Engineering Inc.

7. The surety for the work of Improvement: Merchants Bonding Company (Mutual)

8. All work for this project has been completed.

9. Accepted by minute action of the City Council of the City of Hanford on: December 6, 2022

I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Dated this 6th day of December 2022

BY: ________________________________________
Kalish Morrow, Mayor
City of Hanford, County of Kings, State of California

12.F.c
Packet Pg. 343
Attachment: NOC - Recording Original WORD (PW: NOC Campus Drive Resurfacing Project)

I, the undersigned, say:

I am the person who signed the foregoing notice. I have read the above n otice and know its contents, and the facts stated therein are true of my own knowledge.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed at Hanford, California, this ____ day of ___________, 2022.

BY: ________________________________________
Kalish Morrow, Mayor
City of Hanford, County of Kings, State of California

Authority: Section 1181 Civil Code

12.F.c
Packet Pg. 344
Attachment: NOC - Recording Original WORD (PW: NOC Campus Drive Resurfacing Project)

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 12/6/2022

AGENDA SECTION: G

SUBJECT:

Public Works: Adoption of Resolution 22-46-R setting various Refuse related fees that are not subject to the Prop 218 process, such as extra empties, temporary bin rentals, special event service, etc.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council, by motion, adopt Resolution 22 -46-R setting various Refuse related fees that are not subject to the Prop 218 process, such as fees for extra emptie s, temporary bins, special event service, other optional services, and contamination fines.

BACKGROUND:

In early 2022, City engaged the consulting company IGS to perform a Refuse Enterprise Financial Analysis and Rate Study. The study resulted in propose d modifications to the Refuse fee schedule. A Public Hearing was conducted on October 18, 2022 and the fees subsequently adopted. The adopted fee schedule generally reflected a 10% increase effective November 1, 2022 and adjustments of 4% each July 1st f or the next four years thereafter to account for inflation.

Not included in the adopted refuse rate schedule are fees for "extra" services not associated with routine monthly service, such as extra empties, temporary bin rentals, special event cans, contamination fines, etc. These fees have now been evaluated and the proposed fees reflect the cost to provide the various services.

Contamination fines are mandated by State regulation. The recommended fines are set at $0 for the first violation, $50 for th e second, $100 for the third, and $250 for each violation thereafter.

These values reflect the minimum allowed by regulations.

12.G
Packet Pg. 345
FISCAL IMPACT:

Rates are proposed to be adjusted to reflect actual cost of service. Some rates will increase, some decrease, and others will remain unchanged. Annual increase of 4% each of the next four years beginning July 1, 2023 to adjust for inflation and to be consistent with the recently approved Prop 218 rate adjustments. The fees approved by Council will be updated into the City's Master Fee Schedule.

ATTACHMENTS:
22-46-R, with Exhibit, 120622
NEW Special Event Form 2022

12.G
Packet Pg. 346

Page 1 of 2 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 22-46-R

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HANFORD FIXING VARIOUS

SOLID WASTE FEES UNRELATED TO NORMAL MONTHLY SERVICE

At a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford duly called and held on the 6th day of December 2022, it was moved by Council Member ____________, seconded by Council Member ____________, and carried that the following resolution be adopted:

WHEREAS, Chapter 13.12.040 of the Hanford Municipal Code provides for the fixing of solid waste collection service rates by resolution for residential and commercial services; and WHEREAS, the consulting firm IGService prepared a comprehensive analysis and written report entitled “Refuse Enterprise Financial Analysis and Rate Study, dated August 15, 2022; and WHEREAS, a public hearing to consider the refuse rates and any protests to such rates was held on October 18, 2022, and
WHEREAS. Council adopted the proposed solid waste rates, and WHEREAS, additional refuse services, unrelated to normal monthly service, are offered by City, and
WHEREAS, Hanford Municipal Code, Chapter 13.12.150, states that “Fees for extra or special services shall be set by resolution of the City Council”, and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it in the public interest to adjust the refuse rates for additional services as set forth in the attached Exhibit “A”.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the rates on Exhibit “A” are approved, effective January 1st, 2023; and thereafter as specified, on July 1, 2023; July 1, 2024; July 1, 2025; and July 1, 2026.

Vote tally and signatures on next page

12.G.a
Packet Pg. 347
Attachment: 22-46-R, with Exhibit, 120622 (PW: Approval of Resolution 22-46-R adopting miscellaneous Refuse fees)

Page 2 of 2 ends

PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 6th day of December, 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

MAYOR of the City of Hanford

Attest:

Natalie Corral
City Clerk

12.G.a
Packet Pg. 348
Attachment: 22-46-R, with Exhibit, 120622 (PW: Approval of Resolution 22-46-R adopting miscellaneous Refuse fees) 7/1/2023 7/1/2024 7/1/2025 7/1/2026
New Rate 4% 4% 4% 4%
Extra Empties - Container Size
96GAL $10.85 $10.85 Ea. $11.28 $11.73 $12.20 $12.69
64GAL $8.50 $8.50 Ea. $8.84 $9.19 $9.56 $9.94
1YD BIN $13.75 $18.08 Ea. $18.80 $19.55 $20.33 $21.14
2YD BIN $21.93 $22.74 Ea. $23.65 $24.60 $25.58 $26.60
3YD BIN $29.35 $27.40 Ea. $28.50 $29.64 $30.83 $32.06
4YD BIN New $32.06 Ea. $33.34 $34.67 $36.06 $37.50
6YD BIN $32.90 $41.37 Ea. $43.02 $44.74 $46.53 $48.39
Temporary Bin rental
1YD BIN $55.00 $72.32 1mo/4 empty $75.21 $78.22 $81.35 $84.60 2YD BIN $87.70 $90.96 1mo/4 empty $94.60 $98.38 $102.32 $106.41 Special Event Services
CAN DELIVERY FEE New $25.00 Per 18 Cans $26.00 $27.04 $28.12 $29.24 BIN DELIVERY FEE New $25.00 Per 5 Bins
96GAL EMPTY New $11.00 Ea. $11.44 $11.90 $12.38 $12.88
96GAL CLEAN/RESTOCK New $2.00 Ea. $2.08 $2.16 $2.25 $2.34 2YD EMPTY New $23.00 Ea. $23.92 $24.88 $25.88 $26.92
3YD EMPTY New $27.00 Ea. $28.08 $29.20 $30.37 $31.58
2/3 YD BIN CLEAN/RESTOCK New $15.00 Ea. $15.60 $16.22 $16.87 $17.54 Additional Services
CITY LOCKING FEE (Monthly) New $8.00 Monthly $8.32 $8.65 $9.00 $9.36 SUPPLY CITY LOCK New $15.00 Ea. $15.60 $16.22 $16.87 $17.54 APPLIANCE CHARGE (Authorized only) New $20.00 Ea. $20.80 $21.63 $22.50 $23.40 TIRE CHARGE (Authorized only) $6.00 $10.00 Ea. $10.40 $10.82 $11.25 $11.70 SPECIAL HAUL $34.50 $37.95 5 Item Limit $39.47 $41.05 $42.69 $44.40 LABOR CHARGES $110.00 $121.00 Per Hour $125.84 $130.87 $136.10 $141.54 Contamination Violation
Each contaminated container emptied New $20.00 + Extra Empty $20.80 $21.63 $22.50 $23.40 1st Violation (Escalating Fine) New Warning
2nd Violation (Escalating Fine) New $50.00
3rd Violation (Escalating Fine) New $100.00
4th Violation (Escalating Fine) New $250.00
Notes
City of Hanford - Special Refuse Services and Adjustments Existing & New special event form attached.

Existing
Rates
Violation fines dictated by CalRecycle
Description
Printed 11/30/2022 12:51 PM

12.G.a
Packet Pg. 349
Attachment: 22-46-R, with Exhibit, 120622 (PW: Approval of Resolution 22-46-R adopting miscellaneous Refuse fees)

SPECIAL EVENT SERVICES
Special events generate a significant amount of waste within a short timeframe. Hanford’s Solid Waste Division has designed a program to effectively implement trash and recycling services at your event. The Hanford Solid Waste Division is the exclusive refuse service provider for the City of Hanford and provides trash removal, recycling and food waste compost services for special events.

As an event organizer you are responsible to ensure proper disposal of all trash and recyclables generated throughout your event. The conditions below will help with organizing your solid waste service needs at your next special event.

CONDITIONS:
• Form must be received a minimum of TWO WEEKS prior to proposed event date. • Payment must be rec eived prior to delivery date in the form of check or exact cash at our Public Works Corporation Yard located at 900 S. 10th Ave. Make checks payable to The City of Hanford. • Event containers will be dropped off at your requested location • Once event is over, all cans must be returned to the initial drop off location for empty and removal. • Applicant will identify, defend, and hold City harmless with respect to any personal injury or property damage caused by the condition of the refuse containers, including defects, not caused by City staff.

1. Using the form provided, determine how many containers and the date(s) of service that are needed, and the cost for the services at your event.

SPECIAL EVENT CAN SERVICE FEES
DELIVERY FEES: Charge one delivery fee (currently $25.00) for each eighteen (18) 96 gallon containers up to 54 event cans.

EMPTY FEE: $11.00 per container per empty and disposal of waste.

CLEANING FEE: $2.00 per container to clean and restock.

EVENT BIN DELIVERY FEE: Charge one delivery fee (currently $25.00) up to five (5) 2yd or 3yd commercial bins.

EMPTY FEE: $27.00 (3yd bin) - $23.00 (2yd bin) per empty and disposal of waste CLEANING FEE: $15.00 Per container to clean and restock.

12.G.b
Packet Pg. 350
Attachment: NEW Special Event Form 2022 (PW: Approval of Resolution 22-46-R adopting miscellaneous Refuse fees)

CITY OF HANFORD
Department of Public Works
900 South 10th Avenue Hanford, CA 93230-5234
(559) 585-2550

EVENT CONTAINER ORDER FORM

Organization Name: _______________________________________________________

Applicant Name: __________________________________________________________

Address: ______________________________ Phone Number: ________________

Email Address: ___________________________________________________________

Event Name: ___________________________________ Event Date: _____________

Event Location: _________________________________ Drop Date: _____________

Drop Off Location: _______________________________ Removal Date: __________

Estimated Attendance: ___________

EVENT CAN(S) Number of Cans: BLACK_______ BLUE_______ GREEN_______

EVENT BIN(S) Number of Bins: 2YD______ 3YD______

GRAND TOTAL: _____________

IN THE EVENT THAT A SPECIAL EVENT CAN OR BIN IS LOST, STOLEN OR DAMAGED DURING YOUR EVENT A FEE OF $64 PER CAN AND OR $500 PER BIN.

I fully understand the conditions of the refuse container rental for events.

__________________________________ __________________ Signature of Applicant Date Signed

Fee(s): $_________ Receipt No. _______ Approved By:______________ Date:________

12.G.b
Packet Pg. 351
Attachment: NEW Special Event Form 2022 (PW: Approval of Resolution 22-46-R adopting miscellaneous Refuse fees)

12.G.b
Packet Pg. 352
Attachment: NEW Special Event Form 2022 (PW: Approval of Resolution 22-46-R adopting miscellaneous Refuse fees)

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 12/6/2022

AGENDA SECTION: H

SUBJECT:

Fire: Approval of the purchase of one 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe from Keller of Hanford; approval of upfitting as an emergency response vehicle; and appropriation of $63,530, ($36,972 from Fleet Replacement Fund, $14,133 from the General Fund and $12,425 from the Fire Department Ambulance Fine Reserve).

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council, by motion:

1. Approve the purchase of one (1) 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe from Keller of Hanford, and outfit as an emergency response vehicle for the purchase price of $51,103.62;

2. Approve the Upfitting of the truck with the required lighting, radios, emergency equipment and graphics for an amount to exceed $12,425; and

3. Appropriate a total of $63,530 ($36,972 from Fleet Replacement Fund, $14,133 from the General Fund, $12,425 from Fire Department Ambulance Fine Reserve).

BACKGROUND:

The addition of the Battalion Chief position has warranted a shifting of vehicles within the department. The vehicle currently used by the fire chief will be reallocated to the new battalion chief. The original vehicle assigned to the fire chief was reallocated to the Fire Marshal to be able to travel to new construction projects. The fire chief needs a vehicle to conduct City and Fire Department business and emergency response. Once the new battalion chief is hired, the fire chief will move into an existing 2014 Crown Victoria sedan, currently assigned to Prevention.

The fire chief responds to incidents as the incident commander, safety officer, or to provide for rehabilitation for personnel. This vehicle is not compatible of carrying safety gear and equipment utilized for emergency responses. The existing 2014 Ford Crown Victoria sedan that is currently assigned to our fire prevention vehicle and still maintains some useful life in that role and would remain in our fleet until it was determined to remove it.

12.H
Packet Pg. 353
Staff sought bids to purchase one 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe SUV from three vendors, consistent with the City’s approved purchasing policies, with bid results summarized as follows:

Keller Chevrolet Hanford $51,103.62
Enterprise Fleet Management $53,021.50
Richards Chevrolet Corcoran Unable to provide quote with pursuit package

Keller Chevrolet of Hanford and Richards Chevrolet of Corcoran provided quotes for both a 4x4 and 4x2 vehicle, however Richard's quote was for a 2022 model. Chevrolet fleet vehicles will not be sold until Spring 2023. Richards Chevrolet was unable to provide a quote for the same vehicle with pursuit package. This is required for the added safety features and reduces liability for the City in the event of an accident. As can be noted, the low bid is from Keller of Hanford for the Chevrolet Tahoe and is less than the national contract price and well within the 5% range identified in City Ordinance.

In addition to the vehicle purchase cost, funding is requested to upfit the vehicle with emergency lighting, sirens, and ancillary equipment from Cook's Communications of Fresno ($9,579.66) and vinyl graphic signage from SignWorks of Hanford ($1,714.50). An additional 10% contingency ($1,129.42) is requested to address unexpected inflation issues. The total estimate for the for upfitting is $12,425.

The total vehicle replacement funds for the 2014 Ford Crown Victoria are $36,972. The Fire Department receives funds from ambulance fines to help offset costs related to EMS. As this vehicle may be utilized for EMS related responses, pulling funds from the Fire Department Ambulance Fine Reserves fits the criteria to pay for the upfitting. That reserve fund currently has a balance of over $43,000 with no encumbrances on the total. The KC Public Health and the Central Valley Emergency Medical Services Agency (CCEMSA) has previously certified that the expense would qualify as an allowable use for that funding.

It is therefore recommended that Council approve the purchase of the 2023 4x2 Chevrolet Tahoe from Keller Chevrolet of Hanford for $51,103.62. The total purchase cost of $63,530 would be paid using vehicle replacement reserves from the 2014 Ford Crown Victoria, totaling $36,972, appropriation from the General Fund for $14,133 for the remaining cost of the vehicle purchase, and Ambulance Fines funds not to exceed $12,425 for the emergency vehicle upfitting.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The FY 23 Fleet Replacement Reserve Budget, approved by Council, provides $36,972 to replace an existing 2014 Ford Crown Victoria sedan used by the Fire Chief. The new 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe SUV replacement vehicle cost, including signage and up-fitting, is $63,530.

Therefore, Council would need to appropriate $14,133 from the general fund and $12,425 from Fire Department Ambulance Fine Reserves to fully fund the purchase.

ATTACHMENTS:

12.H
Packet Pg. 354
Cooks Estimate-Hanford Fire Chief 23 Tahoe
Keller Tahoe Quote
Enterprise - 2023 4x2 White Tahoe Quote
Sign Works 2023 Tahoe Estimate

12.H
Packet Pg. 355

12.H.b
Packet Pg. 356
Attachment: Keller Tahoe Quote (Fire: Purchase of one 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe)

12.H.b
Packet Pg. 357
Attachment: Keller Tahoe Quote (Fire: Purchase of one 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe)

12.H.b
Packet Pg. 358
Attachment: Keller Tahoe Quote (Fire: Purchase of one 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe)

12.H.b
Packet Pg. 359
Attachment: Keller Tahoe Quote (Fire: Purchase of one 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe) Prepared For: City of Hanford Date 11/08/2022
Bettencourt, Tommy AE/AM KA/SAF
Unit #
Year 2023 Make Chevrolet Model Tahoe
Series LS 4x2
Vehicle Order Type In-Stock Term 60 State CA Customer# 544923 $ 58,840.00 Capitalized Price of Vehicle 1
$ 0.00 * Sales Tax 0.0000% State CA
$ 747.28 * Initial License Fee
$ 0.00 * Registration Fee
$ 365.00 Other: (See Page 2)
$ 25,000.00 * Capitalized Price Reduction
$ 1,937.50 * Tax on Capitalized Price Reduction
$ 0.00 Gain Applied From Prior Unit
$ 0.00 * Tax on Gain On Prior
$ 0.00 * Security Deposit
$ 0.00 * Tax on Incentive ( Taxable Incentive Total : $0.00 ) All language and acknowledgments contained in the signed quote apply to all vehicles that are ordered under this signed quote.

Order Information
Driver Name
Exterior Color (0 P) Summit White
Interior Color (0 I) Jet Black w/Premium Cloth Seat Trim Lic. Plate Type Exempt
GVWR 0
$ 34,205.00 Total Capitalized Amount (Delivered Price)
$ 564.38 Depreciation Reserve @ 1.6500%
$ 212.85 Monthly Lease Charge (Based on Interest Rate - Subject to a Floor) 2 $ 777.23 Total Monthly Rental Excluding Additional Services Additional Fleet Management
Master Policy Enrollment Fees
$ 0.00 Commercial Automobile Liability Enrollment
Liability Limit $0.00
$ 0.00 Physical Damage Management Comp/Coll Deductible 0 / 0 $ 0.00 Full Maintenance Program 3 Contract Miles 0 OverMileage Charge $ 0.00 Per Mile Incl: # Brake Sets (1 set = 1 Axle) 0 # Tires 0 Loaner Vehicle Not Included $ 0.00 Additional Services SubTotal
$ 60.24 Sales Tax 7.7500% State CA
$ 837.47 Total Monthly Rental Including Additional Services $ 342.20 Reduced Book Value at 60 Months
$ 450.00 Service Charge Due at Lease Termination
Quote based on estimated annual mileage of 15,000
(Current market and vehicle conditions may also affect value of vehicle) (Quote is Subject to Customer's Credit Approval)
Notes
Enterprise FM Trust will be the owner of the vehicle covered by this Quote. Enterprise FM Trust (not Enterprise Fleet Management) will be the Lessor of such vehicle under the Master Open - End (Equity) Lease Agreement and shall have all rights and obligations of the Lessor under the Master Open - End (Equity) Lease Agreement with respect to such vehicle.

Lessee must maintain insurance coverage on the vehicle as set forth in Section 11 of the Master Open-End (Equity) Lease Agreement until the vehicle is sold.

ALL TAX AND LICENSE FEES TO BE BILLED TO LESSEE AS THEY OCCUR.

Lessee hereby authorizes this vehicle order, agrees to lease the vehicle on the terms set forth herein and in the Master Equity Lease Agreement and agrees that Lessor shall have the right to collect damages in the event Lessee fails or refuses to accept delivery of the ordered vehicle. Lessee certifies that it intends that more than 50% of the use of the vehicle is to be in a trade or business of the Lessee.

LESSEE City of Hanford

BY TITLE DATE
* INDICATES ITEMS TO BE BILLED ON DELIVERY.
1 Capitalized Price of Vehicle May be Adjusted to Reflect Final Manufacturer's Invoice. Lessee Hereby Assigns to Lessor anyManufacturer Rebates And/Or Manufacturer Incentives Intended for the Lessee, Which Rebates And/Or Incentives Have Been UsedBy Lessor to Reduce the Capitalized Price of the Vehicle. 2 Monthly Lease Charge Will Be Adjusted to Reflect the Interest Rate on the Delivery Date (Subject to a Floor). 3 The inclusion herein of references to maintenance fees/services are solely for the administrative convenience of Lessee. Notwithstanding the inclusion of such references in this [Invoice/Schedule/Quote], all such maintenance services are to be performed by Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc., and all such maintenance fees are payable by Lessee solely for the account of Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc., pursuant to that certain separate [Maintenance Agreement] entered into by and between Lessee and Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc.; provided that such maintenance fees are being billed by Enterprise FM Trust, and are payable at the direction of Enterprise FM Trust, solely as an authorized agent for collection on behalf of Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc.

Open-End (Equity) Lease Rate Quote Quote No: 6848366
Printed On 11/08/2022 03:11:31 PM Page 1 of 6

12.H.c
Packet Pg. 360
Attachment: Enterprise - 2023 4x2 White Tahoe Quote (Fire: Purchase of one 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe) Other Totals
Description (B)illed or (C)apped Price
Initial Administration Fee C $ 140.00
Pricing Plan Delivery Charge C $ 225.00
Courtesy Delivery Fee B $ 0.00
Total Other Charges Billed $ 0.00
Total Other Charges Capitalized $ 365.00
Other Charges Total $ 365.00
Open-End (Equity) Lease Rate Quote Quote No: 6848366
Printed On 11/08/2022 03:11:31 PM Page 2 of 6

12.H.c
Packet Pg. 361
Attachment: Enterprise - 2023 4x2 White Tahoe Quote (Fire: Purchase of one 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe) VEHICLE INFORMATION:
2023 Chevrolet Tahoe LS 4x2 - US
Series ID: CC10706
Pricing Summary:

INVOICE MSRP
Base Vehicle $51,273.2 $54,200.00
Total Options $-46.70 $-1,150.00
Destination Charge $1,795.00 $1,795.00
Total Price
SELECTED COLOR:

Exterior: GAZ-(0 P) Summit White
Interior: H0U-(0 I) Jet Black w/Premium Cloth Seat Trim SELECTED OPTIONS:

CODE DESCRIPTION INVOICE MSRP
1LS Preferred Equipment Group 1LS NC NC
ADJUSTMENT Dealer Adjustment $-547.20 $-1,700.00
AY0 Frontal Airbags Included Included
AZ3 Front 40/20/40 Split-Bench Seat $-227.50 $-250.00
B30 Color-Keyed Carpeting Floor Covering Included Included B58 1st & 2nd Row Color-Keyed Carpeted Floor Mats Included Included BTV Remote Start Included Included
C6C GVWR: 7,400 lbs (3,357 kgs) STD STD
GAZ_01 (0 P) Summit White NC NC
GU5 3.23 Rear Axle Ratio STD STD
H0U_01 (0 I) Jet Black w/Premium Cloth Seat Trim NC NC
IOR Radio: Chevrolet Infotainment 3 System STD STD
L84 Engine: 5.3L EcoTec3 V8 STD STD
MHS Transmission: Electronic 10-Speed Automatic w/OD STD STD N57 Wrapped Steering Wheel Included Included
PNTTBL01 Paint Table : Solid Paint $0.00 $0.00
RD4 Wheels: 20" x 9" Painted Aluminum $728.00 $800.00
STDTM Premium Cloth Seat Trim Included Included
T3S LED Daytime Running Lamps Included Included
U2K SiriusXM Radio w/360L Included Included
UIJ Infotainment Display Included Included
UQF 6-Speaker Audio System Feature Included Included
WARANT Fleet Customer Powertrain Limited Warranty NC NC XCI Tires: 275/60R20SL AS BW Included Included
YF5 California State Emissions Requirements NC NC
ZW7 Premium Smooth Ride Suspension STD STD
ZY1 Solid Paint STD STD
$53,021.50 $54,845.00
Open-End (Equity) Lease Rate Quote Quote No: 6848366
Printed On 11/08/2022 03:11:31 PM Page 3 of 6

12.H.c
Packet Pg. 362
Attachment: Enterprise - 2023 4x2 White Tahoe Quote (Fire: Purchase of one 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe) CONFIGURED FEATURES:

Body Exterior Features:

Number Of Doors  4
Rear Cargo Door Type:  liftgate
Driver And Passenger Mirror:  power remote heated manual folding side-view door mirrors Spoiler:  rear lip spoiler
Side Steps:  yes
Door Handles:  body-coloured
Front And Rear Bumpers:  body-coloured front and rear bumpers Rear Step Bumper:  rear step bumper
Body Material:  galvanized steel/aluminum body material Roof Rack:  rails only
:  class IV trailering with harness, hitch
Body Side Cladding:  black bodyside cladding
Grille:  grille with chrome bar
Convenience Features:

Air Conditioning  automatic dual-zone front air conditioning Air Filter:  air filter
Rear Air Conditioning:  rear air conditioning with separate controls Cruise Control:  cruise control with steering wheel controls Power Windows:  power windows with front and rear 1-touch down 1/4 Vent Rear Windows:  power rearmost windows
Remote Keyless Entry:  keyfob (all doors) remote keyless entry Illuminated Entry:  illuminated entry
Integrated Key Remote:  integrated key/remote
Auto Locking:  auto-locking doors
Passive Entry:  proximity key
Valet Key:  valet function
Trunk FOB Controls:  keyfob trunk/hatch/door release
Remote Engine Start:  remote engine start - keyfob and smart device (subscription required) Steering Wheel:  steering wheel with manual tilting, manual telescoping Day-Night Rearview Mirror:  day-night rearview mirror
Driver and Passenger Vanity Mirror:  illuminated auxiliary driver and passenger-side visor mirrors Emergency SOS:  OnStar and Chevrolet connected services capable emergency communication system Front Cupholder:  front and rear cupholders
Overhead Console:  mini overhead console
Glove Box:  locking glove box
Driver Door Bin:  driver and passenger door bins
Rear Door Bins:  rear door bins
Seatback Storage Pockets:  2 seatback storage pockets
IP Storage:  covered bin instrument-panel storage
Driver Footrest:  driver's footrest
Retained Accessory Power:  retained accessory power
Power Accessory Outlet:  1 12V DC power outlet
AC Power Outlet:  2 120V AC power outlet
Entertainment Features:
radio  SiriusXM with 360L AM/FM/Satellite with seek-scan Voice Activated Radio:  voice activated radio
Speed Sensitive Volume:  speed-sensitive volume
Steering Wheel Radio Controls:  steering-wheel mounted audio controls Speakers:  6 speakers
Internet Access:  Wi-Fi Hotspot capable internet access TV Tuner:  OnStar Turn-by-Turn Navigation turn-by-turn navigation directions 1st Row LCD:  2 1st row LCD monitor
Wireless Connectivity:  wireless phone connectivity
Antenna:  window grid antenna
Lighting, Visibility and Instrumentation Features:

Printed On 11/08/2022 03:11:31 PM Page 4 of 6

12.H.c
Packet Pg. 363
Attachment: Enterprise - 2023 4x2 White Tahoe Quote (Fire: Purchase of one 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe) Headlamp Type  delay-off aero-composite LED low/high beam headlamps Auto-Dimming Headlights:  IntelliBeam auto high-beam headlights Front Wipers:  variable intermittent Rainsense rain detecting wipers wipers Rear Window wiper:  fixed interval rear window wiper
Rear Window Defroster:  rear window defroster
Tinted Windows:  deep-tinted windows
Dome Light:  dome light with fade
Front Reading Lights:  front and rear reading lights
Ignition Switch:  ignition switch light
Variable IP Lighting:  variable instrument panel lighting Display Type:  analog appearance
Tachometer:  tachometer
Voltometer:  voltmeter
Compass:  compass
Exterior Temp:  outside-temperature display
Low Tire Pressure Warning:  tire specific low-tire-pressure warning Park Distance Control:  Front and Rear Park Assist front and rear parking sensors Trip Computer:  trip computer
Trip Odometer:  trip odometer
Lane Departure Warning:  lane departure
Front Pedestrian Braking:  pedestrian detection
Following Distance Indicator:  following distance alert Forward Collision Alert:  forward collision
Oil Pressure Gauge:  oil pressure gauge
Water Temp Gauge:  water temp. gauge
Engine Hour Meter:  engine hour meter
Clock:  in-radio display clock
Systems Monitor:  systems monitor
Check Control:  redundant digital speedometer
Rear Vision Camera:  rear vision camera
Oil Pressure Warning:  oil-pressure warning
Water Temp Warning:  water-temp. warning
Battery Warning:  battery warning
Low Oil Level Warning:  low-oil-level warning
Low Coolant Warning:  low-coolant warning
Lights On Warning:  lights-on warning
Key in Ignition Warning:  key-in-ignition warning
Low Fuel Warning:  low-fuel warning
Low Washer Fluid Warning:  low-washer-fluid warning
Door Ajar Warning:  door-ajar warning
Trunk Ajar Warning:  trunk-ajar warning
Brake Fluid Warning:  brake-fluid warning
Turn Signal On Warning:  turn-signal-on warning
Transmission Fluid Temperature Warning:  transmission-fluid-temperature warning Safety And Security:

ABS  four-wheel ABS brakes
Number of ABS Channels:  4 ABS channels
Brake Assistance:  brake assist
Brake Type:  four-wheel disc brakes
Vented Disc Brakes:  front and rear ventilated disc brakes Daytime Running Lights:  daytime running lights
Spare Tire Type:  full-size spare tire
Spare Tire Mount:  underbody mounted spare tire w/crankdown Driver Front Impact Airbag:  driver and passenger front-impact airbags Driver Side Airbag:  seat-mounted driver and passenger side-impact airbags Overhead Airbag:  curtain 1st, 2nd and 3rd row overhead airbag Occupancy Sensor:  front passenger airbag occupancy sensor Height Adjustable Seatbelts:  height adjustable front seatbelts Seatbelt Pretensioners:  front seatbelt pre-tensioners
Printed On 11/08/2022 03:11:31 PM Page 5 of 6

12.H.c
Packet Pg. 364
Attachment: Enterprise - 2023 4x2 White Tahoe Quote (Fire: Purchase of one 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe) 3Point Rear Centre Seatbelt:  3 point rear centre seatbelt Side Impact Bars:  side-impact bars
Tailgate/Rear Door Lock Type:  tailgate/rear door lock included with power door locks Rear Child Safety Locks:  rear child safety locks
Ignition Disable:  PASS-Key III immobilizer
Security System:  security system
Panic Alarm:  panic alarm
Tracker System:  tracker system
Electronic Stability:  StabiliTrak electronic stability stability control with anti-roll Traction Control:  ABS and driveline traction control
Front and Rear Headrests:  manual adjustable front head restraints Rear Headrest Control:  2 rear head restraints
3rd Row Headrests:  2 fixed third row head restraints
Break Resistant Glass:  break resistant glass
Seats And Trim:

Seating Capacity  max. seating capacity of 9
Front Bucket Seats:  front split-bench 40-20-40 seats
Number of Driver Seat Adjustments:  8-way driver and passenger seat adjustments Reclining Driver Seat:  power reclining driver and passenger seats Driver Lumbar:  power 2-way driver and passenger lumbar support Driver Height Adjustment:  power height-adjustable driver and passenger seats Driver Fore/Aft:  power driver and passenger fore/aft adjustment Driver Cushion Tilt:  power driver and passenger cushion tilt Front Centre Armrest Storage:  front centre armrest with storage Rear Seat Type:  rear manual reclining 60-40 split-bench seat Rear Seat Fore/Aft:  manual rear seat fore/aft adjustment Rear Folding Position:  rear seat tumble forward
Rear Seat Armrest:  rear seat centre armrest
3rd Row Seat Type:  fixed third row 60-40 split-bench seat 3rd Row Electric Control:  fold into floor third row seat Leather Upholstery:  cloth front and rear seat upholstery Headliner Material:  full cloth headliner
Floor Covering:  full carpet floor covering
LeatherSteeringWheel:  leatherette steering wheel
Floor Mats:  carpet front and rear floor mats
Interior Accents:  chrome/metal-look interior accents
Cargo Space Trim:  carpet cargo space
Trunk Lid:  plastic trunk lid/rear cargo door
Cargo Light:  cargo light
Concealed Cargo Storage:  concealed cargo storage
Standard Engine:

Engine 355-hp, 5.3-liter V-8 (regular gas)
Standard Transmission:

Transmission 10-speed automatic w/ OD and auto-manual
Printed On 11/08/2022 03:11:31 PM Page 6 of 6

12.H.c
Packet Pg. 365
Attachment: Enterprise - 2023 4x2 White Tahoe Quote (Fire: Purchase of one 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe) Estimate
SignWorks109 E. 5th StreetHanford, CA 93230ph.(559) 583-1175(559) 583-1824faxemail:[email protected] City Of HanfordPrepared For:900 S. 10th AvenueHanford, CA 93230Frank EtulainEstimate: No:Date:Terms:Due DateSalesperson: 3317010/31/2022 1:41:41PM(559) 362-06000 day(s) from orderBrianna Garciaph:fax:Net 30Description:Graphics for Tahoe - Fire DepartmentDear Frank: Thank you for considering SignWorks for your sign needs. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me at 583-1175 >>> PLEASE CONTACT US SO WE CAN PROCEED WITH THIS ORDER, THANK YOU. <<<Sincerely,Brianna GarciaSales Rep.QtySizeUnit CostItem TotalSidesProductInstall1 $1,671.00 $1,671.00 1 x 11 $0.00 Custom SignReflective Vinyl Graphic for Truck. This price includes application.Description Notes:Line Item Total:$1,671.00 Tax Exempt Amt:$1,071.00 Subtotal:$1,671.00 $43.50 Taxes:Total:$1,714.50 Accepted By (signature required)DateFax Confirmation to (559) 583-1824

12.H.d
Packet Pg. 366
Attachment: Sign Works 2023 Tahoe Estimate (Fire: Purchase of one 2023 Chevrolet Tahoe)

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 12/6/2022

AGENDA SECTION: I

SUBJECT:

Police: Authorization to enter into a contract with Alarm Program Services (APS), at an annual cost of $12,000 for the overall administration of the Alarm Permitting process for the City of Hanford and Appropriation of an additional $7,000 for the Police Department's budget for the remainder of the year.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council, by motion, authorize a contract with Alarm Program Services, in the amount of $12,000.00 per year ($1,000 monthly) and appropriate $7,000 for the remainder of the year to the Police Department's budget (15121000).

BACKGROUND:

The Alarm Program System (APS) is an automated system for generating alarm permits, renewal notices, false alarm notices and permit suspensions. The program will generate billing and includes an online appeals process. These functions are time consuming and are currently being performed by staff members from the Records and Communications divisions.

The contract with APS will free up valuable time that our records clerks need to process criminal reports. It will also allow for a more proactive approach to alarm billing.

One of the primary focuses of APS is to reduce false alarms and create awareness in the community of the city ordinance and its goals. The contract will include.

APS conducting outreach campaigns via email and phone.

APS contacting alarm companies to sign up existing customers.

APS conducting weekly billing of alarm customers.

APS providing for an on-line payment method
APS will provide an online appeals process
APS will return fees in excesses of those required by the contract to the City of Hanford.

APS will provide an online instruction to community of how to reduce false alarms

12.I
Packet Pg. 367
APS will provide us assistance in adapting our municipal code related to burglar alarms

The Alarm Program System will assist the Hanford Police Department to lower agency costs, heighten public awareness, increase program revenues, reduce false alarms and free up valuable resources for effective emergency response. The Hanford Police Department is not able to bill as often as APS would. This sometimes results in "Surprise bills". APS's increased billing cycle will inform citizens on a more regular basis of their alarm billing status, enabling them to correct mistakes before it costs the citizens additional money on false alarms.

Currently, the City collects approx. $50,000 in alarm registrations and false alarm billings, according to the finance department. If APS experiences the increase in compliance they expect at 30% ($15,000), this would completely offset the purchase of the billing contract.

The Current City alarm billings are as follows.

10.00 Annual Alarm Registration
3 free false alarms.
4th - $50.00
5th - 75.00
6th - 100.00 for each additional false alarm.

The City Council at the study session requested a change to the Municipal code that would change the charges as follows.

10.00 Annual Registration
2 Free False Alarms
3rd False Alarm $50.00 or take a free class online on how to prevent false alarms. (Approx. 10min)
4th $50.00
5th $75.00
6th $100.00 for each additional false alarm,
resets each calendar year.

This is a sole source purchase and other quotes were not obatained. APS is the only system that is compatible with our current CAD/RMS system. The integration is essential in order to ensure this relieves work from the Hanford Police Department and does not cause additional work.

Integration will allow APS to pull alarm billing directly from our CAD/RMS system. (Computer Aided Dispatching / Records Management.)

The attached contract is the standard agreement between APS and the Cities it services. The agreement will be reviewed by the City attorney prior to signing. The term is for three (3) years with two one (1) year extensions.

Other entities currently using our CAD/RMS system and APS, were contacted and were happy with the performance of APS in their alarm billing program.

FISCAL IMPACT:

12.I
Packet Pg. 368
If so approved by Council, the contract with APS would require a $12,000 annual fee potentially completely offset with increased revenues from the service, Based on other clients, APS expects a 30% increase in alarm compliance ($15,000) which would offset this impact. An additional appropriation of $12,000 to the Police Department would provide adequate budget for this agreement.

ATTACHMENTS:

APSHanfordContractDraft

12.I
Packet Pg. 369
Alarm Program Management Service Agreement
For the City of Hanford, CA

This Alarm Program Management Service Agreement (hereinafter “Agreement”) is made and entered into this 29th day of November, 2022 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Alarm Program Systems, LLC, a California limited liability company ("Company"), and the City of Hanford ("City"), hereinafter individually referred to as "Party" and collectively referred to as the "Parties."

RECITALS
WHEREAS, Company is in the business of providing services to municipalities with alarm ordinances; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Hanford Municipal Code Section 8.04, the City has enacted laws governing the installation and use of private alarm systems and City desires to retain Company to administer and manage City's functions under the Alarm Ordinance (“City’s Alarm Management Program”), including collections, in accordance with the terms set forth below.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained in this Agreement, the parties, each intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:

AGREEMENT

1. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the effective date and continue in full force and effect for three (3) calendar years thereafter ("Initial Term"), unless earlier terminated as provided elsewhere in this Agreement. The contract shall automatically renew on the anniversary date with two (2) additional one-year renewals with 90 days’ notice to terminate for either party during each annual contract period.

2. Termination. In the event either party shall, in good faith, determine the other to be in breach of the terms of this Agreement, the non-breaching party shall deliver written notice of the breach to the party in breach. The party in breach shall have thirty (30) days after notice is delivered to cure the breach. If the breach is not timely cured to the reasonable satisfaction of the non-breaching party, the non-breaching party may terminate this Agreement immediately upon delivering written notice of termination to the party in breach.

Additionally, the parties acknowledge the terms of this Agreement relating to the Company's compensation were negotiated and established based upon current City ordinances and fee schedules applicable to alarm permits in effect on the effective date of this Agreement. In the event there is a change in any of the fees during the term of this Agreement, as extended from time to time, Company shall have the right to request modification of this Agreement's compensation terms. Company shall notify City, in writing, of Company's desire to negotiate new compensation terms and each party shall engage in good faith negotiations regarding same.

12.I.a
Packet Pg. 370
Attachment: APSHanfordContractDraft (PD: Alarm Program Systems Purchase and Appropriation of $12,000)

3. Scope of Services. Company agrees to perform the services set forth in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth.

In the event City determines additional work beyond that contained in the Scope of Services is necessary for the effective administration of the City's Alarm Management Program, City may request Company perform this additional work. Following receipt of City's written authorization (which authorization shall include the rate of compensation payable to Company for such additional work) for the performance of such additional work, Company shall make all reasonable efforts to perform the additional work requested, submitting to City itemized invoices for the additional work performed. City agrees to deliver to Company, within 30 days of the invoice date, payment in full for each such itemized invoice submitted.

4. Compensation. Company shall be compensated in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth.

5. Obligation of City. City shall make available and/or deliver to Company, on a timely basis, those items Company determines necessary for Company's performance of its obligations under this Agreement, including, but not limited to, information, personnel, and technical support.

6. Ownership Rights. Company owns the software developed for and to be utilized in the operation and administration of City's Alarm Management Program ("Application Software") and Company retains all rights and titles therein and thereto. Upon City’s request, Company shall allow City limited access to any Application Software used by Company in connection with its duties hereunder, which access shall be provided for the purpose of verifying Company’s compliance with the terms of this Agreement. City acknowledges that apart from its limited right of access it possesses no other right, license, or interest in Company’s Application Software.

City shall own all data relating to the alarm permits, including the documents prepared by Company for the purpose of administering and operating City's Alarm Management Program.

Upon termination of this Agreement, each party shall, upon written request from the other party, promptly return to the other all documents, data, equipment, software, and other material belonging to, or otherwise owned by, the other party.

7. Confidentiality. The information and material Company receives from City regarding the individuals and/or businesses covered by City's Alarm Ordinance, or participating in City's Alarm Management Program, as well as the documents and material Company generates therefrom, are confidential to the extent permitted by law. And except as required for its performance under this Agreement, Company shall not disclose confidential information to any third party without City's prior written consent, unless Company is otherwise required by law to do so.

12.I.a
Packet Pg. 371
Attachment: APSHanfordContractDraft (PD: Alarm Program Systems Purchase and Appropriation of $12,000) Further, Company shall instruct its personnel to comply with the restrictions placed on the use and for disclosure of said confidential information.

8. Hold Harmless. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Company shall indemnify, defend (at Company's sole expense, with legal counsel approved by City) and hold harmless the City of Hanford, members of its City Council, its boards and commissions, officers, agents, and employees (hereinafter, "Indemnitees"), from and against a loss, damage, cost, expense, liability, claims, demands, suits, attorneys' fees and judgments arising from or in any manner connected to Company's or its employees’ or agents’ wrongful or negligent acts related to this Agreement. This indemnification includes, but is not limited to, tort liability to a third person for bodily injury and property damage. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein shall be construed to require Company to indemnify an Indemnitee from any claim arising from the negligence or willful misconduct of that Indemnitee.

The duty to defend referenced herein is wholly independent from the duty to indemnify, arises upon written notice by City to Company of a claim within the scope of this indemnification provision, and exists regardless of any determination of the ultimate liability of Company, City or any Indemnitee.

9. Insurance. Without limiting its obligations pursuant to Section 8 of this Agreement, the Company shall procure and maintain, at Company's own cost and expense and for the duration of this Agreement, insurance coverage as set forth in "Insurance Requirements" attached to and incorporated into this Agreement as Exhibit "C.”

10. Permits and Licenses. Company, at its sole expense, shall obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement, all appropriate permits, licenses, and certificates that may be required in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement including, but not limited to, a City of Hanford business license.

11. Notices. Any notice given in connection with this Agreement shall be given in writing, will be sent by registered or certified U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, or by commercial overnight delivery service, by facsimile, or electronic transmission, and will be deemed delivered either on the date of return receipt acknowledgment (in the case of U.S. Mail), or on the next day after the sending of the notice (in the case of facsimile or electric transmission notice or overnight delivery service). Notices and other communications shall be addressed as follows:

Address if to Company:

Alarm Program Systems, LLC
367 Civic Drive., Suite 10
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
Attention: Jim Huchingson, President

12.I.a
Packet Pg. 372
Attachment: APSHanfordContractDraft (PD: Alarm Program Systems Purchase and Appropriation of $12,000) Address if to City:

Hanford Police Department
425 N Irwin Street
Hanford, CA 93230
Attention: Chief Parker Sever

Either party may notify the other, in writing, of a new address or contact person to which notices or other communications are to be delivered.

12. Non-Waiver. The failure of either party to exercise any of its rights under this Agreement for a breach thereof will not be deemed to be a waiver of such rights or a waiver of any subsequent breach.

13. Force Majeure. Neither Party will have any claim or right against the other for any failure of or delay in performance by such other Party if the failure or delay is caused by or the result of causes beyond the reasonable control of such other Party, including, but not limited to, acts of God, fire, flood, hurricane, or other natural catastrophe; terrorist actions, laws, orders, regulations, directions or actions of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the subject matter hereof, or any civil or military authority, national emergency, insurrection, riot or war; inability to obtain equipment, material or other supplies, or other similar occurrence beyond the control of the affected Party. Any such delay or failure will suspend the affected Party’s obligations until the delay or failure ceases.

14. Choice of Law. Any dispute under, or related to, this Agreement shall be decided in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

15. Severability. If any part of this Agreement is held unenforceable, the rest of this Agreement shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect.

16. Amendments. This Agreement may be supplemented, amended, or revised only in writing signed by each Party.

17. Relationship of Parties. The legal relationship between the Parties hereto is that of an independent contractor, and nothing herein shall be deemed to make Company a City employee. During the performance of this Agreement, Consultant and its officers, employees, and agents shall act in an independent capacity and shall not act as City officers or employees.

The personnel performing the Scope of Services under this Agreement on behalf of Company shall at all times be under Company’s exclusive direction and control. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision or control of Company’s employees, representatives, or agents, or in fixing their compensation or hours of service. Company shall pay all wages, salaries and other amounts due its employees in connection with this Agreement and shall be responsible for all reporting obligations respecting them. City shall not, in any way or for any

12.I.a
Packet Pg. 373
Attachment: APSHanfordContractDraft (PD: Alarm Program Systems Purchase and Appropriation of $12,000) purpose, be deemed a partner of Company in its business or otherwise a joint venture or a member of any joint enterprise with Company.

18. Entire Agreement. This Agreement is the entire agreement between the Parties and it cannot be amended or modified orally. This Agreement may be supplemented, amended or revised only by a writing, which is signed by each of the Parties.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date first above written.

Alarm Program Systems, LLC

By:

______________________
Jim Huchingson
President

City of Hanford

By:

_____________________
Mario Cifuentes, City Manager

12.I.a
Packet Pg. 374
Attachment: APSHanfordContractDraft (PD: Alarm Program Systems Purchase and Appropriation of $12,000) Exhibit 'A'
Scope of Services

Generally, Company shall, consistent with City's current Alarm Ordinance, as amended from time to time, provide, operate, and maintain City's Alarm Management Program. In connection therewith, Company is responsible for developing, providing, installing, operating, and maintaining the system necessary to communicate with City, its Police Department, and those members of its citizenry affected by the alarm ordinance. As used herein, the term "Company's system" shall mean the equipment, including, but not limited to computer hardware and software, as well as the personnel and supplies necessary to carry out and operate City's Alarm Management Program and perform Company's duties and obligations articulated in the Alarm Management Service Agreement.

More specifically, Company shall provide a system capable of performing, producing and otherwise generating the following outcomes:

1. System Interface. Company's system shall enable Company to communicate with the various City departments necessary for the effective performance of City's Alarm Management Program, including, but not limited to, City's Police Department.

2. System Capability, Functionality. Company's system, in addition to interfacing with City's departments, and as described with more particularity in the paragraphs that follow, shall acquire, access, assimilate, produce, record and store data relevant to the operation of City's Alarm Management Program; generate and issue notices, permits and billing statements; track accounts receivables, and generate reports as more particularly described below.

3. Billing and Collection.

(a) Company's system shall perform billing and payment collection functions consistent with the terms of City's Alarm Ordinance. Except as otherwise provided herein, Company will generate billing statements that include the following details:

i. The name and mailing address of the individual or business billed; ii. The nature of the bill (i.e. initial registration, permit renewal, excess alarm fee); iii. Previous amount due;
iv. New charges;
v. Payments received (and/or other adjustments);
vi. The current amount due;
vii. The date payment is due; and
viii. A telephone number with instructions to call should the individual or business have questions about its bill.

Additionally, billing statements shall include a detachable form to be remitted with payment.

12.I.a
Packet Pg. 375
Attachment: APSHanfordContractDraft (PD: Alarm Program Systems Purchase and Appropriation of $12,000) (b) Company's system will provide customers with the ability to make payment on-line or by mail. On-line payments shall be by credit card and shall be processed through a secure site, and payments by mail shall be delivered to a Post Office Box maintained and managed by Company.

(c) Company's system shall track the occurrence of each incomplete payment brought about by customer's initiation of a stop payment order, chargeback, or delivery of a bad check of any kind, as well as the fee, if any, associated with each such occurrence. Company's system shall add any such fee assessed or otherwise incurred to the balance due from such customer and subsequently deliver a new bill to customer.

4. Records. In addition to the information necessary for the production of billing statements under paragraph 3 above, Company's system shall maintain the records necessary for operation of City's Alarm Management Program, including records of the following information:

i. Current customers, including name, mailing address, issue date of original registration, registration expiration date, annual registration renewal date, registration number, type of registration (residential or commercial), contact person and telephone number; ii. Registration number assigned to each customer;
iii. Amount due from each customer;
iv. Customer payment status (current or delinquent);
v. Total customer payments received each day, each week, each month and each calendar year;
vi. Total customer payments received broken down by payment date, payment type and registration number;
vii. A list of customers delinquent in their payments including the amount owed by each such customer and the total amount owed by all such customers; viii. The total number of violations for each customer/location broken down by the hour of day, day of the week, week of the month, month of the year, and year; ix. A list of customers currently pursuing appeal of billing; and x. A list of customers who have completed the appeals process along with a description of the outcome.

5. Reports. Company's system shall permit the generation and production of a variety of reports based upon the entry of a variety of parameters, including, but not limited to, registration number, customer name, customer address, incident type and date, including a range of dates. For example, Company's system shall possess the ability to produce the following types of reports:

i. New alarm registrations issued and the fees collected therefor; ii. Total number of annual registration renewals billed, including the total dollar amount cited and the total dollar amount collected;
iii. Total number of false alarms by type (i.e. burglar or robbery) and by category (registered or non-registered customer);

12.I.a
Packet Pg. 376
Attachment: APSHanfordContractDraft (PD: Alarm Program Systems Purchase and Appropriation of $12,000) iv. Total number of false alarms billed for each type and category as well as the fees collected therefor;
v. A list of registrations by customer name, site address, registration number, and/or alarm company;
vi. A list of the total dollar amount of charges billed, total dollar amount received, and total dollar amount of charges outstanding; and
vii. Activity reports illustrating registrations (original and renewal), renewal notifications, billing and collections, as well as false alarm incidents.

6. Additional Functions. Company's system shall be equipped to perform the following functions:

i. Generate and assign registration numbers automatically; ii. Generate, print and deliver registrations;
iii. Generate, print and deliver billing statements and renewal notices; iv. Generate, print and deliver notices of non-compliance to non-registered alarm users; v. Generate, print and deliver notices of excessive false alarms to registered alarm users; vi. Generate, print and deliver notices and billing statements to non-registered alarm users who trigger false alarms;
vii. Establish and maintain a directory of alarm companies providing service within the geographical boundaries of City, including in said directory, Alarm Company name, address, telephone number, and contact person;
viii. Provide a link to City's Alarm Ordinance.

7. Additional Obligations. In addition to the other obligation contained in this Agreement, Company shall, during the term of this Agreement, perform the following obligations:

ii. Maintain Company's equipment in good working order to help ensure uninterrupted operation of City's Alarm Management Program;
ii. Take reasonable steps to protect Company's computer system against infection and corruption by means of virus, worm, or another similar invader; iii. Maintain a telephone number which individuals may call to speak with someone about the specific details of their bill or to ask about the alarm permit program generally; iv. Provide training to those City employees engaged in the operation and/or oversight of City's Alarm Management Program; and
v. Provide the personnel necessary to carry out and perform the duties and obligations of Company as described in the Alarm Management Service Agreement.

8. Ordinance Consulting. Alarm Program Systems (APS) will assist Hanford with Alarm Ordinance review, design and modification. APS will furnish industry standard ordinance templates, fee schedules and best practices. Additionally, APS will make resources available from our current set of customers to share best practices. We maintain close relationships with all of our agency partners and encourage all parties to share information covering the entire

12.I.a
Packet Pg. 377
Attachment: APSHanfordContractDraft (PD: Alarm Program Systems Purchase and Appropriation of $12,000) alarm program lifecycle from design, presenting to City Council and implementation/management.

12.I.a
Packet Pg. 378
Attachment: APSHanfordContractDraft (PD: Alarm Program Systems Purchase and Appropriation of $12,000) Exhibit “B”
Schedule of Compensation

Contractor and City acknowledge the terms of this Agreement relating to the Contractor's compensation were negotiated and established based upon current City Ordinances and fee schedules applicable to alarm permits in effect on the effective date of this Agreement. In the event there is a change in any of the fees during the term of this Agreement, as extended from time-to-time, Contractor and or City shall have the right to request modification of this Agreement's compensation terms. Contractor and or City shall notify the other Party, in writing, of the desire to negotiate new compensation terms and each Party shall engage in good faith negotiations regarding same.

All revenues generated and collected by and/or on behalf of the City during the term of this Agreement shall be divided among the Parties as follows:

APS fixed annual service fee of $12,000, billed in 12 monthly payments of $1,000.

APS will retain from collected alarm program revenue the agreed upon monthly fee of $1,000 and distribute all collections in excess of that amount to Hanford. Should program revenues not exceed the agreed upon fee in any month, the balance will carry forward to the next month.

This revenue split will be based on total permit fees, renewal fees, false alarm fines, reinstatement fees, late fees or related fines collected by Contractor for City. Contractor shall be solely responsible for the payment of any one-time costs, including, but not limited to, any costs relating to implementation, data conversion, CAD interface, technical support, hardware, and training. Program costs for postage, mailing materials, credit card transaction fees and banking fees will be paid from gross alarm program revenues prior to the agreed upon monthly fee.

Payment System:

Contractor will reconcile, on the first of each month, the previous month's deposits. Based on each monthly reconciliation, Contractor will invoice City showing all revenues collected and invoices paid. An ACH request will be made and the City's portion of the revenue shall be deposited to the City's designated bank within 5 days of the 1st of each month.

12.I.a
Packet Pg. 379
Attachment: APSHanfordContractDraft (PD: Alarm Program Systems Purchase and Appropriation of $12,000) Exhibit “C”

Insurance Requirements
Insurance Requirements
The insurance coverages specified in this paragraph are required unless modified by Exhibit 'A' of this agreement. If insurance requirements are contained in Exhibit “A”, they take precedence.

The Contractor shall, at the Contractor’s own expense, maintain with an insurance carrier authorized or eligible to do business in the State of California, with minimum coverage as outlined below, commercial automobile liability insurance, and either commercial general liability insurance or, if any services required by the contract must be performed by persons authorized by the State of California, professional liability insurance:

Commercial Automobile Liability
Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability Insurance $1,000,000 each occurrence OR combined single limit coverage of $2,000,000, with not greater than a $1000 deductible.

Commercial General Liability
Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability Insurance $1,000,000 each occurrence OR combined single limit coverage of $2,000,000, with not greater than a $1000 deductible.

Professional Liability Insurance
Shall include errors and omissions insurance providing $1,000,000 coverage, with not greater than a $5,000 deductible for all liability, which may be incurred during the life of this contract.

The City of Hanford shall be named as an additional insured on all required policies, except professional liability insurance, and such insurance, as is carried by the Contractor, shall be primary over any insurance carried by the City of Hanford. The Contractor shall provide a certificate of insurance, to be approved by the City of Hanford prior to contract execution, which shall be attached to the contract.

Such insurance policies or related certificates of insurance shall name the City of Hanford as an additional insured on all general liability, automobile liability, employers’ liability, and excess policies. The Contractor may comply with these insurance requirements through a program of self- insurance that meets or exceeds these minimum limits. The Contractor must provide the City of Hanford with adequate documentation of self-insurance, prior to performing any work related to this contract, and treat the City as an insured under the indemnity agreement.

Should the Contractor no longer benefit from a program of self-insurance, the Contractor agrees to promptly obtain insurance as provided above. A forty-five (45) Calendar Day written notice shall be given prior to termination of or any material change to the policy(ies) as it relates to this Agreement.

12.I.a
Packet Pg. 380
Attachment: APSHanfordContractDraft (PD: Alarm Program Systems Purchase and Appropriation of $12,000) The City of Hanford shall have no obligation to report occurrences unless a claim is filed with the City of Hanford Auditor; nor shall the City of Hanford have an obligation to pay premiums.

In the event of nonrenewal, cancellation of, or material change in the coverage required, thirty (30) days written notice will be furnished the City of Hanford prior to the date of cancellation, change or nonrenewal.

12.I.a
Packet Pg. 381
Attachment: APSHanfordContractDraft (PD: Alarm Program Systems Purchase and Appropriation of $12,000)

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 12/6/2022

AGENDA SECTION: J

SUBJECT:

Police: Approval of the Purchase of a Mustang Mach E Police Admin Vehicle from Keller Ford of Hanford, CA in the amount of $62,379.99 and up to $2,500 for outfitting costs with Cooks Communications (Fresno).

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council, by motion, approve the purchase of a Mustang Mach E Police Admin Vehicle from Keller Ford of Hanford, CA in the amount of $62,379.99 and up to $2,500 with Cook's Communications for vehicle outfitting (total cost of $64,880) and appropriate $41,549 from the General Fund and $23,331 from the Vehicle Replacement Fund for the purchase.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Hanford was awarded a grant through the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) for the purchase of "Clean Air" vehicles. The grant was awarded for up to 5 vehicles with a reimbursement of up to $20,000 per vehicle. This purchase would satisfy one of those grant awards.

Police Administration currently operates a Ford Fusion Hybrid and this all electric unit will replace that unit. Quotes were obtained from McPeaks Dodge, who is the dealer for police vehicles under the California Multiple Awards Schedule (CMAS) contract for the State of California. Sourcewell, a government clearing house for pricing that saves time and money for the tax payer and Keller Ford a local auto dealer.

Unfortunately, in today's vehicle market there was no significant difference in price as everyone was at or above MSRP. The lowest quote was Keller Ford at $62,379.99. Keller was slightly higher than the quote from Sourcewell, however the City of Hanford's Local Preference Ordinance allows for the award to a local vendor as long as the final price is within 5% of competing quotes. The Keller complies with this requirement and the quote is attached. Up to $2,500 will be needed for equipment installation on the vehicle with Cook's Communications (Fresno) for a total purchase price of $64,800.

12.J
Packet Pg. 382

This vehicle will be assigned to Admin at the Hanford Police Department and will replace an existing vehicle and also allow for a test of full electric vehicles. Currently the Mustang Mach E is the only electric vehicle to pass the Michigan Police vehicle trials and is being procured at other agencies for police service. The police department is equipped with electric charging stations suitable for this vehicle. The vehicle will also not utilize any gas and will replace an existing vehicle that does. The existing vehicle will be repurposed for other City uses until it is determined to be suitable for disposal.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The total vehicle costs will be $64,880 and an appropriation of $41,549 is requested from the General Fund with $23,331 from the Vehicle Replacement Fund. After the $20,000 grant is applied to the purchase price, the remaining balance will be funded from the Fleet replacement reserves. A total of $23,331 has been collected for the replacement of the Ford Fusion. The remaining $21,549 will need to come from the General Fund.

ATTACHMENTS:
mustang quote

12.J
Packet Pg. 383

12.J.a
Packet Pg. 384
Attachment: mustang quote (PD: Air Resource Grant Vehicle purchase and appropriation)

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 12/6/2022

AGENDA SECTION: K

SUBJECT:

Finance: Authorize amendment to professional services agreement, in an amount not to exceed $48,700, with SDI Presence LLC (Carmichael, CA) and appropriate said funding from the Computer Replacement Fund (0414) to assist in completion of the Tyler Software Implementation.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that City Council authorize addendum to professional services agreement of up to $48,700 with SDI Presence LLC (Carmichael, CA) and appropriate said funding from the Computer Replacement Fund.

BACKGROUND:

The City is in the midst of several critical system implementations and has been for over three (3) years now. Tyler Munis financial system, Tyler Energov licensing, land management, and permitting system, UKG Payroll/HR (complete) and the Tyler Utility Billing system implementations. Implementations of this type require significant time and resources to implement, however, an appropriate level of staffing was never planned as part of the implementation process and as a result, several delays have occurred that make other implementation resources necessary for a more efficient and successful launch. Due to the size and effort required for these implementations, it is clear there is a continued need to supplement staff resources and bring in outside expertise. SDI has an existing agreement in place for up to $102,900 previously approved, this amendment will also bring in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) assistance into the agreement which the City has been lacking causing additional slow downs on the project.

Staff recommends authorizing this amendment bring the total agrement not to exceed $151,600 due to the expertise to implement the City’s systems efficiently and effectively with existing staff resources. Should these implementations not occur timely or as best as possible, there could be significant customer service impacts. Staff will work with SDI to keep costs as low as possible, it is not anticipated the full amount of the agreement will be needed due to project management

12.K
Packet Pg. 385
winding down but the need for GIS work is a factor.

System Implementation History

On May 1, 2018, the City Council approved a contract with Tyler Technologies for their Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software and implementation in the amount of $912,479.

The first software platform in that implementation process was the Munis Financial System. At the time, it had a projected “Go Live” date of January 2020. In December of 2018 it was determined that the City was falling behind in the implementation schedule due to lack of staff and poor development planning, therefore, the City amended the contract and selected what Tyler terms as their “Production Ready” platform. The additional costs for migrating to the “Production Ready” platform for the Munis Financial System was approximately $21,880. The original go live for Financial system was to be in April of 2019. Moving to the Production Ready version allowed for the completion of the implementation to occur sooner, in July of 2019, but still three (3) months beyond the original implementation date.

The Human Content Management (HCM) software was to be the next phase of the implementation and should have been completed in conjunction with Financials, but it was not, due to improper setup and the staff not having a clear understanding of the data that was needed to build the system. Implementation of HCM was originally scheduled for October 2019, but due to the delays in Financials was then pushed to January 2020. This deadline was not met either due to staffing changes in both HR and Finance. In July 2021, City Council authorized proceeding with another system called UKG, which is anticipated to go live January 2022.

EnerGov was originally set to start in January 2019. At that time, Staff from the various departments that would be utilizing the software, held the initial kick off meeting with Tyler.

After the Kick-off meeting, it was determined that staffing was not adequate to perform the implementation and the decision was made to migrate that product to the “Production Ready” version as well. This move, and additional cost, was done to ensure that the City would be able to meet the original timeline for implementation. On February 19, 2019, the City Council approved a contract amendment in the amount of $110,080 to move to the "Production Ready" version.

The EnerGov software will be utilized by various City Departments to add efficiencies to the operations and provide better interaction and customer service to the public and our Citizens. It will be used for the following purposes:
· Buildings and Planning - Submittal of Applications and Plans and the Issuance/tracking of Permits;
· Code Enforcement - Tracking of complaints and compliance issues; · Finance - Applications, Issuance and tracking of Business Licenses; · Public Works - Applications, Issuance and tracking of Encroachment and Transportation Permits; and
· Fire - Application, Issuance and tracking of Fire Permits.

Due to a variety of issues, and absent a solid plan for implementation from the outset of the project, the implementation process has gone on longer than expected. Additionally, due to

12.K
Packet Pg. 386
some internal changes to processes, as well as additional processes done by the City, it has been determined that additional implementation time with Tyler was needed before the software can go live and Council has already approved that additional work. The additional processes that we will be adding to EnerGov will be the issuance/tracking of Burglar Alarm Permits as well as Animal Licensing with the Police Department.

The last remaining platform that will need to be implemented is the Munis Utility Billing (UB) software. The UB software had its initial kick-off call in October 2019. The original go live date was slated for January/February 2021. Due to a switch in Project Managers from the Tyler side and changes to City staff, the implementation has been pushed back. At this point we plan to go live in December2022/January 2023 for Utility Billing and Energov. Final testing and planning is underway.

Summary of System Costs (Tyler)

Original Contract Amount: $912,479
Upgrade to Production Ready Munis $21,880
Upgrade to Production Ready EnerGov: $110,080
Upgrade of EnerGov platform: $81,400
Total Projected Cost/Contract: $1,125,839

Summary of System Costs (UKG, Inc.)
$12,000

Staff must continue day to day operations on top of these implementations which in most cases does not lead to successful implementations. Due to the costs incurred and need for sufficient staff resources needed for these projects, it is recommended to amend SDI's agreement to continue assisting the City to assist and supplement staff for these critical system implementations. SDI and staff will work to maximize time spent on the project and keep costs as low as possible. Project management has been helpful in holding Tyler accountable to timelines and availability of resources for implementation saving the City some change order costs with Tyler.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Funding of $48,700 will be appropriated from the Computer Replacement Fund which will allocate charges out to other funds based on resources used. The total amount of $102,900 has currently been authorized for this agreement bringing the total not to exceed $151,600 and will now include GIS assistance.

ATTACHMENTS:

SDI Advisory and PM Services Proposal Amendment Three - City of Hanford

12.K
Packet Pg. 387

SDI Presence LLC 6829 Fair Oaks Blvd. Suite 100 Carmichael, CA 95608 sdipresence.com toll-free 1-877-339-7875 main 916-692-2000

November 17, 2022

Mr. Chris Tavarez
Finance Director
City of Hanford
315-321 North Douty St.

Hanford, CA 93230

RE: Advisory and Project Management Services
Dear Mr. Tavarez:

SDI Presence, LLC (SDI), respectfully submits this proposal to the City of Hanford (City) to provide advisory and project management services for the City’s Tyler Munis financial system, Tyler Energov licensing, land management, and permitting system, and the Tyler Utility Billing system implementations.

Since 1999, SDI ’s West Coast Division, which is headquartered in Sacramento, has worked with more than 180 local government agencies to plan, procure, implement, and operate technology in more efficient and effective ways. SDI has worked with more than 40 similarly sized public agencies to help them assess, procure, select, and implement their Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems. As an example, SDI is currently providing, or has recently completed ERP projects at the following municipalities:
• City of Benicia
• City of San Ramon
• City of Redwood City
• City of Gilroy
• City of Merced
• City of Sunnyvale
• City of Walnut Creek
• City of Burlingame
• City of Vacaville
• City of Fremont
• City of Fresno
• City of Davis
• City of Rohnert Park
• City of Dublin
• City of East Palo Alto
We look forward to partnering with the City and supporting the various Tyler implementations. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please do not hesitate to contact me at 530.598.4915, and via email at [email protected].

Sincerely,

Scott Sanders
Vice President – State, Local, and Education
SDI Presence LLC

12.K.a
Packet Pg. 388
Attachment: SDI Advisory and PM Services Proposal Amendment Three - City of Hanford (Finance: Authorize agreement amendment with SDI City of Hanford Advisory and PM Services Proposal
August 31, 2021 Page | 1

SDI Background and Qualifications
SDI is a management consulting firm that helps public sector clients enhance their use of technology. SDI focuses on helping public sector clients assess, plan, implement, and manage complex business technology. SDI brings leadership, executive presence, and diverse perspective to our clients’ most complex projects. SDI’s consultants bring experience gained from running large IT operations and multimillion -dollar IT projects and having held pr ior positions with Tier One consultancies. Our consultants include former CIOs, CFOs, Utility General Managers, Community Development Directors, and Assistant City Managers. SDI builds on these gained insights when working with our clients, taking the time to understand a client’s specific situation and needs, developing robust plans to address those needs within the situational boundaries, and delivering solutions that are on specification, on time, and within budget.

SDI services are based on industry sta ndards, methodologies, processes, and tools, including those set forth by the Project Management Institute (PMI), Institute of Management Consultants, Software Engineering Institute (SEI), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), and the Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL).

Project Team
SDI’s foundation is in talented, high- caliber individuals guided by the personal and professional principles of honesty, integrity, quality, and a commitment to client satisfaction. This foundation and associated ethics help us to attract and retain a veteran staff that inspires confidence in our clients. Our proposed team has extensive hands-on experience in the application of technologies specific to all different types of public agencies, as well as current and proven experience in applying our project management methodology in the development of effective plans.

Figure 1, Project Organization, depicts our project organizational chart. Following the organization chart, we provide a summar y of the qualifications and expertise of each team member. Full resumes are available upon request.

Figure 1, Project Organization

12.K.a
Packet Pg. 389
Attachment: SDI Advisory and PM Services Proposal Amendment Three - City of Hanford (Finance: Authorize agreement amendment with SDI City of Hanford Advisory and PM Services Proposal
August 31, 2021 Page | 2

Scott Sanders, CGCIO, ITIL – Engagement Manager
Mr. Sanders is an insightful and results oriented professional with more than thirty -four years of technical leadership experience, including more than twenty years serving in City and County Information Technology departments across the State of California.

With significant experience and proven ability earned while serving in both technical and business leadership roles, Mr. Sanders maintains a strong focus on technology service management, aligned with organizational goals and objectives. In more than twenty years of experience within municipal IT departments, he has ser ved in the capacities of Technology Manager, Network Manager, Operations Manager, IT Director, Deputy Chief Information Officer, and Chief Information Officer. Mr. Sanders has served in executive leadership roles within several municipal organizations across the State of California.

Mr. Sanders holds numerous technology certifications , including CGCIO – Certified Government Chief Information Officer and ITIL Foundations, Service Strategy, Service Design, Operations and Continual Service Improvement.

Role in the engagement: Mr. Sanders is Vice President of Operations for SDI’s State, Local, and Education clients. He will ensure the City’s expectations are met and see that SDI services are delivered effectively and efficiently.

Mike Allen – Subject Matter Expert
Mr. Allen has over 35 years of information technology experience within the public sector. Starting from a programming background at the City of Roseville and continuing as the IT Manager for the City of Visalia, he has extensive hands-on municipal experience that is broad and deep. As a former MISAC state board member , Mr. Allen has gained effective collaboration, organization, planning, and project skills. His career has focused on helping organizations implement complex technology solutions and effectively utilize technology to solve business problems.

As a subject matter expert , coupled with hands -on project management and implementation experience, Mr. Allen offers strong decision support, analytical, technical, project management, communications, and program management skills to the proposed project.

Role in the engagement : Mr. Allen will function as a subject matter expert and project lead , conducting all day-to-day project activities for the City.

Bruce Smith, Ph.D. – Subject Matter Expert
Dr. Smith is a highly experienced management consultant with expertise in public sector operations, management, and technology. He has over 45 years of experience as a manager within the public sector or as a consultant supporting the public sector. His consulting strengths include project management, operations improvement , including problem analysis and recommendations, implementation and change management.

As a former City Manager and Budget Officer, he understands the unique requirements of public sector organizations, and can help facilitate decision making processes.

Role in the engagement: Dr. Smith is available to serve as a subject matter expert on the project, providing support for both the ERP and EnerGov implementations.

12.K.a
Packet Pg. 390
Attachment: SDI Advisory and PM Services Proposal Amendment Three - City of Hanford (Finance: Authorize agreement amendment with SDI City of Hanford Advisory and PM Services Proposal
August 31, 2021 Page | 3

Catherine “Katie” Atkinson – GIS Subject Matter Expert
Ms. Atkinson is a highly experienced GIS Analyst , Systems Administrator, and Subject Matter Expert who is able to support all levels of a GIS environment. Ms. Atkinson served for more than 16 years as a GIS Analyst at the county level, supporting local desktop and server hardware, custom GIS applications, and ArcGIS Online services. She has extensive scripting experience in several programming languages, including SQL, Python, Arcade, JSON, and HTML.

Ms. Atkinson has planned, deployed, integrated, and maintained multi-server ArcGIS Enterprise systems with dedicated Portal, ArcGIS Server, Data Server, SQL Server , and Web Adapter – DMZ server environments. She has experience working with CAL -OES and other State of California agencies such as Cal Fire.

Role in the engagement: Ms. Atkinson will serve as the project’s GIS subject matter expert.

Scope of Services
Tyler Technologies EnerGov Implementation Support. SDI will continue supporting the City’s EnerGov implementation, including facilitation of train-the-trainer and final testing sessions, go- live assistance, post implementation review , and final project closure activities. Based on the activities already scheduled, SDI estimates that an additional 120 hours will be required.

Utility Billing Implementation Support. SDI will continue supporting the City’s Utility Billing implementation, including facilitation and coordination of parallel testing, pre-go-live review, go- live assistance, post implementation review, and final project closure activities. Based on the activities already scheduled, SDI estimates that an additional 112 hours will be required.

Geographical Information System Services. SDI will provide GIS services for the creation and application integration of several GIS layers, including:
• Improvement districts.
• School district boundaries – If the information can be obtained. • Inspection areas – Code Enforcement may be provided by the County, though Building and Public Works areas have not been defined.
• Vested maps.
• City facilities, parks, et cetera.
• Utility Billing routes and districts – Seven routes anticipated. • Utility Billing towers or inspection areas.

Please note that a comprehensive review of GIS data available to the City has not yet been accomplished by SDI. After review, SDI will have a better understanding of the current state of GIS information, and the number of hours estimated to be required. SDI estimates that a minimum of 60 hours will be required , and will communicate a more realistic estimate to the City once the review is complete. Ongoing maintenance of the City’s GIS data has not been included in this estimate.

12.K.a
Packet Pg. 391
Attachment: SDI Advisory and PM Services Proposal Amendment Three - City of Hanford (Finance: Authorize agreement amendment with SDI City of Hanford Advisory and PM Services Proposal
August 31, 2021 Page | 4

Project Pricing
SDI will continue to invoice at discounted hourly rates for the remainder of the project. Mr. Allen and Dr. Smith will be invoiced at $175 per hour, while Ms. Atkinson will be invoiced at $135 per hour. All activities will be invoiced on a time and materials basis, and one month in arrears, with a description of hours and activities performed.

Individual Hourly Rate Minimum Hours Estimated Cost
Mike Allen
Dr. Bruce Smith
$175 232 $40,600.00
Katie Atkinson $135 60 $8,100.00
Total Estimated 292 $48,700.00
SDI estimates that a minimum of 292 hours will be necessary to complete the City’s projects, as detailed in the Scope of Work section and table above. SDI anticipates a not-to-exceed cost of $48,700 for the proposed scope of work.

12.K.a
Packet Pg. 392
Attachment: SDI Advisory and PM Services Proposal Amendment Three - City of Hanford (Finance: Authorize agreement amendment with SDI

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 12/6/2022

AGENDA SECTION: L

SUBJECT:

Finance: Review and Approval of the City of Hanford's Fiscal Year 2021/2022 Annual Report of Development Impact Fees (AB 1600 Mitigation Fee Act)

FISCAL IMPACT:

ATTACHMENTS:

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT 2021-22

12.L
Packet Pg. 393

CITY OF HANFORD

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT
FY2021/2022

12.L.a
Packet Pg. 394
Attachment: DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT 2021-22 (Finance: FY 2021/2022 Annual Report of Development Impact Fees) 0180 Park Impact Fee
0181 Circulation Impact Fee
181-001 198/12th Ave Intersection
181-002 12th Avenue
181-003 13th Avenue
181-004 43/198 - Costco Center
0182 Fire Protection Impact Fee
0183 Police Protection Impact Fee
0184 Storm Water System Impact Fee
0185 Water System Impact Fee
0186 Wastewater System Impact Fee
0187 Refuse/Recycling Impact Fee
2023 2026 2028 2031 2033 2036
u u u
u u u
u u u
u u u
u u u
u u u
u u u
u u u
u u u
u u u
u u u
u u u
5-YEAR FINDINGS SCHEDULE
GC 66001(d)
1 12.L.a
Packet Pg. 395
Attachment: DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT 2021-22 (Finance: FY 2021/2022 Annual Report of Development Impact Fees) Other Total Total
Beginning Fund Impact Fees Interest Misc. Revenue, Revenue Expenditures Ending Fund Fund Balance Collected Earned Credits, and for Fiscal Year for Fiscal Year Balance Refunds
Park 4,330,511 1,126,731 37,253 250 1,164,234 (345,403) 5,149,342 Circulation 2,537,563 2,031,907 40,218 66,391 2,138,515 (447,267) 4,228,811 Fire Protection 336,504 214,192 3,421 0 217,613 (18,451) 535,666 Police Protection 39,411 127,412 790 240 128,442 (57,243) 110,609 Storm Water 634,358 44,158 4,935 80 49,173 (63,172) 620,359 Water System 2,692,553 982,792 24,275 0 1,007,067 (234,754) 3,464,865 Wastewater System 1,953,610 916,017 18,680 0 934,697 (106,279) 2,782,028 Refuse/Recycle 66,576 190,508 731 0 191,240 (111,437) 146,379 12,591,086 5,633,715 130,304 66,961 5,830,980 (1,384,008) 17,038,058

CITY OF HANFORD
Impact Fee Fund Summary
GC 66006
FY 2021-2022

12.L.a
Packet Pg. 396
Attachment: DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT 2021-22 (Finance: FY 2021/2022 Annual Report of Development Impact Fees)

CITY OF HANFORD
Public Improvement Summary
CIP # Parks Expense
821653 LACEY PARK BASKETBALL COURTS 32,916 23% 2021-22 822607 PARK DEV OVERSIZING REQUIREMNT 7,898 100% ONGOING 822642 HIDDEN VALLEY PARK/FITNESS CT 126,457 100% 2021-22 Sub-Total 167,271
Circulation
819624
821619
822616
EAST LACEY WIDENING 10TH TO SIERRA 125,079 34% 2018-19 820640 12TH AVE WID/SPRINGCREST-SW 5,636 79% 2019-20
820644 TRAF SIGNAL/12TH AV TO HUME 108,873 11% 2020-21 822613 UNSCH ARTERIAL UPGR/TRAF SIGNL 10,530 100% ONGOING Sub-Total 250,118
Fire Protection
Sub-Total -
Police Protection
820651
822639 POLICE DEPT PARKING LOT EXPANSION 52,993 100% 2021-22 Sub-Total 52,993
Storm Water
820648 PUMP INSTALL/MUSSEL SLOU-LAURA 38,367 53% 2021-22 822620 STORM DRAIN SYS OVERSIZING REQ 2,630 100% ONGOING Sub-Total 40,997
Water System
822630 WATER MAIN OVERSIZING REQUIRE 2,630 100% ONGOING 822633 NEW WATER SUPPLY WELL 99,552 70% 2021-22
822636 INDUSTRIAL PARK WATER STORAGE 10,187 20% 2022-23 Sub-Total 112,370
Wastewater System
822623 SEWER MAIN OVERSIZING REQUIRE 2,630 100% ONGOING Sub-Total 2,630
Refuse/Recycling
822002 COMMERCIAL/RECYCLE DUMPSTERS 21,250 14% ONGOING 822003 AUTOMATED REFUSE CONTAINERS 38,160 19% 2021-22 Sub-Total 59,410
Grand Total 685,790
GC 66006
FY 2021-2022
% of Total Cost of
Improv. Funded from
Impact Fees
Approx. date to commence (construction), if
funds available to complete project

12.L.a
Packet Pg. 397
Attachment: DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT 2021-22 (Finance: FY 2021/2022 Annual Report of Development Impact Fees) Resolution: 21-29-R Effective Date: 7/20/2021

CATEGORY FEE
Low Density Residential (per unit) $2,740.28
Medium Density Residential (per unit) $2,454.12
High Density Residential (per unit) $2,167.95
Development Fee for Single Family Residence $8,191.17

IMPACT FEE CREDITS
Park Improvements Acre $187,903.40
Land for Park Acre $91,782.00
Basis: Estimated park development cost, total unimproved acres in City, estimated population and future dwelling units.

Non-residential uses are not charged the parks impact fee.

The Parks Impact Fee fund was established April 20, 2004 by the City Council Resolution 04-23-R. The purpose of the Parks Impact Fee is to acquire and/or develop public park and recreational facilities in order to reduce the impacts of overcrowding of existing park facilities caused by new development within the Hanford General Plan Area.

CITY OF HANFORD
Description and Fee Amount
GC 66001(d) and 66006
FY 2021-2022

PARK IMPACT FEES

12.L.a
Packet Pg. 398
Attachment: DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT 2021-22 (Finance: FY 2021/2022 Annual Report of Development Impact Fees)

CITY OF HANFORD
Description and Fee Amount
GC 66001(d) and 66006
FY 2021-2022

CIRCULATION IMPACT FEES
Resolution: 21-29-R Effective Date: 7/20/2021

CATEGORY UNITS FEE
Single-Family Residential Dwelling Unit $3,890.68
Multi-Family Residential Dwelling Unit $2,732.01
Senior Residential/ Assisted Living Dwelling Unit $1,414.79 Hotel/Motel (per room) Room $2,476.76
Retail (<100KSF) (unless specifically listed below) 1,000 sq. ft. $11,341.95 Retail (>100KSF) 1,000 sq. ft. $8,564.79
Convenience Store - without gas station 1,000 sq. ft. $102,662.57 Gas Station - with or without convenience store Fueling Position $15,007.04 Motor vehicle sales, minor and major repair 1,000 sq. ft. $2,148.65 Restaurant - no drive-thru 1,000 sq. ft. $21,937.30
Restaurant with drive-thru - stand-alone 1,000 sq. ft. $100,262.84 Restaurant with drive-thru with in a shopping center 1,000 sq. ft. $26,955.29 General Office/ Bank 1,000 sq. ft. $4,827.34
Medical/Dental Office 1,000 sq. ft. $9,764.59
Government 1,000 sq. ft. $2,955.77
Industrial/Service Commercial 1,000 sq. ft. $1,942.95
Warehouse/Distribution < 100,000 sq. ft. 1,000 sq. ft. $1,602.63 Warehouse/Distribution > 100,000 sq. ft. or Mini Storage 1,000 sq. ft. $770.72 Religious Institution or Facility (unitless) $2,099.24
Other Uses Option Per Trip $376.75

IMPACT FEE CREDITS
Circulation- Arterial and Major Arterial Street
Median Curb (both sides) Lineal Foot $20.40
Median Concrete (16' wide) Lineal Foot $163.17
Pavement (one side- 22' wide) Lineal Foot $81.17
Right of Way in Exceeding 42' Wide Half Street Square Foot $2.11 Circulation- Collection Street
Pavement (one side- 18' wide) Lineal Foot $57.88
Circulation- Street Intersections
Traffic Signal Each $407,920.00
Intersection Improvements (full) Each $407,920.00
*Tripend rates for other than those listed above shall be determined using trip general statistics in the Insitute of Transporation *Tripends for development within the MX-D, Mixed Use Downtown Zone District shall be reduced by 20% to reflect captured trip rates for multi-use district.
*Cost of improvement completed by developer on arterial and designated collectors will be credited in accordance with the The Circulation Impact Fee Fund was established April 20, 2004 by the City Council Resolution 04-27-R. The purpose of the Circulation Impact Fee is to meet goals and objectives of the land use and circulation elements of the the City's general plan and to mitigiate the transportation, traffic, and air quality impacts caused by new development within the Hanford General Plan Area. Additionally, the fee supports public transportation improvements and construction of transportation system facilities.

Basis: Estimated total costs of new circulation infrastructure needed to support new growth, land uses, trip demand factor for each identified use, average daily trips, estimated total future residential units and non-residential square footage. Downtown uses have a 20% reduction in fees. Fees amount vary by the type of units used.

12.L.a
Packet Pg. 399
Attachment: DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT 2021-22 (Finance: FY 2021/2022 Annual Report of Development Impact Fees)

CITY OF HANFORD
Description and Fee Amount
GC 66001(d) and 66006
FY 2021-2022
Resolution: 21-29-R Effective Date: 7/20/2021

CATEGORY FEE
Low Density Residential (per unit) $546.39
Medium Density Residential (per unit) $307.14
High Density Residential (per unit) $154.32
Development Fee for Single Family Residence $8,191.17
Neighborhood Commercial (per square foot) $0.4584
Regional Commercial (per square foot) $0.3820
Service Commercial (per square foot) $0.5730
Highway Commercial (per square foot) $0.4584
Office Residential (per square foot) $0.1910
Office (per square foot) $0.2149
Neighborhood Mixed Used (per square foot) $0.4584
Corridor Mixed Used (per square foot) $0.4584
Downtown Mixed Used (per square foot) $0.0764
Light Industrial (per square foot) $0.1333
Heavy Industrial (per square foot) $0.1333
Open Space (per square foot) $0.0000
Public Facilities (per square foot) $0.0533
Educational Facilities (per square foot) $0.0000

FIRE PROTECTION IMPACT FEES
The Fire Impact Fee Fund was established April 20, 2004 by the City Council Resolution 04-22-R. The purpose of the Fire Impact Fee is to finance the construction of Fire Facilities and purchase of fire fighting equipment in order to reduce the impacts on fire facilities and equipment caused by new development.

Basis: Estimated incidents per acre for residential, commercial and industrial land use designations.

12.L.a
Packet Pg. 400
Attachment: DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT 2021-22 (Finance: FY 2021/2022 Annual Report of Development Impact Fees)

CITY OF HANFORD
Description and Fee Amount
GC 66001(d) and 66006
FY 2021-2022
Resolution: 21-29-R Effective Date: 7/20/2021

CATEGORY FEE
Low Density Residential (per unit) $296.50
Medium Density Residential (per unit) $438.42
High Density Residential (per unit) $142.19
Development Fee for Single Family Residence $8,191.17
Neighborhood Commercial (per square foot) $0.6106
Regional Commercial (per square foot) $0.2682
Service Commercial (per square foot) $0.0878
Highway Commercial (per square foot) $0.2017
Office Residential (per square foot) $0.3597
Office (per square foot) $0.2165
Neighborhood Mixed Used (per square foot) $0.5828
Corridor Mixed Used (per square foot) $0.3959
Downtown Mixed Used (per square foot) $0.3415
Light Industrial (per square foot) $0.0125
Heavy Industrial (per square foot) $0.0047
Open Space (per square foot) $0.0000
Public Facilities (per square foot) $0.0770
Educational Facilities (per square foot) $0.0000
Basis: Estimated incidents per acre to apply to land use designations.

POLICE PROTECTION IMPACT FEES
The Police Impact Fee Funds was established April 20, 2004 by the City Council Resolution 04-21-R. The purpose of the Police Impact Fee is to finance the construction of Police Facilities and purchase police equipment in order to reduce impacts on police facilities and equipment caused by new development.

12.L.a
Packet Pg. 401
Attachment: DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT 2021-22 (Finance: FY 2021/2022 Annual Report of Development Impact Fees)

CITY OF HANFORD
Description and Fee Amount
GC 66001(d) and 66006
FY 2021-2022
Resolution: 21-29-R Effective Date: 7/20/2021

CATEGORY FEE
Low Density Residential (per acre) $2,415.95
Medium Density Residential (per acre) $2,657.54
High Density Residential (per acre) $2,899.13
Development Fee for Single Family Residence $531.51
Neighborhood Commercial (per acre) $4,348.70
Regional Commercial (per acre) $4,348.70
Service Commercial (per acre) $4,348.70
Highway Commercial (per acre) $4,348.70
Office Residential (per acre) $2,899.13
Office (per acre) $4,348.70
Neighborhood Mixed Used (per acre) $4,348.70
Corridor Mixed Used (per acre) $4,348.70
Downtown Mixed Used (per acre) $3,477.26
Light Industrial (per acre) $3,865.51
Heavy Industrial (per acre) $3,865.51
Open Space (per acre) $0.00
Public Facilities (per acre) $3,382.32
Educational Facilities (per acre) $3,382.32

IMPACT FEE CREDITS
12'' Pipeline Lineal Foot $97.90
21'' Pipeline Lineal Foot $223.89
24'' Pipeline Lineal Foot $264.34
30'' Pipeline Lineal Foot $325.03
36'' Pipeline Lineal Foot $385.73
42'' Pipeline Lineal Foot $446.42
48'' Pipeline Lineal Foot $527.34
60'' Pipeline Lineal Foot $608.26
96'' Pipeline Lineal Foot $1,034.44
Retention Basin (0 to 5 acre feet) Acre Foot $33,694.27 Retention Basin (Over 5 to 10 acre feet) Acre Foot $20,116.02 Retention Basin (Over 10 to 20 acre feet) Acre Foot $11,447.09 Retention Basin (Over 20 acre feet) Acre Foot $6,951.12 The Storm Water System Impact Fee Fund was established April 20, 2004 by the City Council Resolution 04-26-R.The purpose of the Storm Water System Impact Fee is to finance the construction and expansion of Storm Water collection, drainage and retention system facilities in order to reduce impacts on storm water facilities caused by new development.

Additionally, these improvements will ensure the City will continue to provide an effective and efficient storm water drainage system for it's citizens.

Basis: Impervious surface percentage factor from the Storm Drainage Master Plan along with an adjustment for a 20% reduction in fees for downtown uses to provide an impact dollar amount for each land use designation.

STORM WATER IMPACT FEES

12.L.a
Packet Pg. 402
Attachment: DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT 2021-22 (Finance: FY 2021/2022 Annual Report of Development Impact Fees)

CITY OF HANFORD
Description and Fee Amount
GC 66001(d) and 66006
FY 2021-2022
Resolution: 21-29-R Effective Date: 7/20/2021

CATEGORY FEE
Low Density Residential (per unit) $2,482.21
Medium Density Residential (per unit) $1,387.60
High Density Residential (per unit) $840.11
Development Fee for Single Family Residence $8,191.17
Neighborhood Commercial (per square foot) $1.0580
Regional Commercial (per square foot) $0.9228
Service Commercial (per square foot) $1.2791
Highway Commercial (per square foot) $1.0580
Office Residential (per square foot) $1.1378
Office (per square foot) $0.7356
Neighborhood Mixed Used (per square foot) $1.3189
Corridor Mixed Used (per square foot) $1.1885
Downtown Mixed Used (per square foot) $0.2515
Light Industrial (per square foot) $1.4892
Heavy Industrial (per square foot) $1.5183
Open Space (per square foot) $0.0000
Public Facilities (per square foot) $1.2791
Educational Facilities (per square foot) $0.6710

IMPACT FEE CREDITS
8" Pipeline Lineal Foot $66.29
12" Pipeline Lineal Foot $176.68
18" Pipeline Lineal Foot $214.44
Groundwater Well (1,500 gpm) Each $1,224,024.13
Pump Station (3 @ 3,100 gpm) Each $4,082,258.38
Pump Station (4 @ 1,400 gpm) Each $2,792,641.74
Storage Tank (1.5 MG) Each $3,487,690.51
Land for Storage Tank or Well Acre $40,792.00

WATER SYSTEM IMPACT FEES
The Water System Impact Fee Fund was established April 20, 2004 by the City Council Resolution 04-24-R. The purpose of the Water System Impact Fee is to finance the construction and expansion of Water Facilities in order to reduce the impacts on Water Facilities caused by new development. Additionally, the fee will continue to provide for efficient water service to the citizens of the City and an adequate supply of quality water.

Basis: Water demand coefficient from the Water Master Plan and an adjustment for fire flow to determine an estimated total gallons of water per day for each land use designation.

12.L.a
Packet Pg. 403
Attachment: DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT 2021-22 (Finance: FY 2021/2022 Annual Report of Development Impact Fees)

CITY OF HANFORD
Description and Fee Amount
GC 66001(d) and 66006
FY 2021-2022
Resolution: 21-29-R Effective Date: 7/20/2021

CATEGORY FEE
Low Density Residential (per unit) $2,125.78
Medium Density Residential (per unit) $1,701.69
High Density Residential (per unit) $1,551.58
Development Fee for Single Family Residence $8,191.17
Neighborhood Commercial (per square foot) $0.7156
Regional Commercial (per square foot) $0.7361
Service Commercial (per square foot) $0.7267
Highway Commercial (per square foot) $0.7156
Office Residential (per square foot) $1.5373
Office (per square foot) $0.7198
Neighborhood Mixed Used (per square foot) $1.3975
Corridor Mixed Used (per square foot) $1.0062
Downtown Mixed Used (per square foot) $0.4391
Light Industrial (per square foot) $0.8246
Heavy Industrial (per square foot) $0.9504
Open Space (per square foot) $0.0000
Public Facilities (per square foot) $0.7267
Educational Facilities (per square foot) $0.4472

IMPACT FEE CREDITS
8" Gravity Main Lineal Foot $181.52
12" Gravity Main Lineal Foot $307.50
15" Gravity Main Lineal Foot $322.34
18" Gravity Main Lineal Foot $347.97
21" Gravity Main Lineal Foot $377.63
24" Gravity Main Lineal Foot $392.47
27" Gravity Main Lineal Foot $453.16
30" Gravity Main Lineal Foot $532.73
36" Gravity Main Lineal Foot $662.21
18" Force Main Lineal Foot $310.42
Lift Station GPM $1,410.18
The Wastewater System Impact Fee Fund was established April 20, 2004 by the City Council Resolution 04-25-R. The purpose of the Wastewater System Impact Fee is to finance the construction and expansion of Wastewater Facilities, relocation and expansion of wastewater holding ponds as well as the acquisition and development of effluent irrigation areas in order to reduce the impacts on Wastewater Facilities caused by new development.

Basis: Unit flow factor from the Wastewater Master Plan to determine an estimated total gallons per days of wastewater generated for each land use designation.

WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES

12.L.a
Packet Pg. 404
Attachment: DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT 2021-22 (Finance: FY 2021/2022 Annual Report of Development Impact Fees)

CITY OF HANFORD
Description and Fee Amount
GC 66001(d) and 66006
FY 2021-2022

REFUSE/RECYCLING IMPACT FEES
Resolution: 21-29-R Effective Date: 7/20/2021

CATEGORY FEE
Residential Container/Equipment (per unit) $494.60
Commercial
Per No. of 1 cubic yard dumpsters $866.83
Per No. of 2 cubic yard dumpsters $1,091.19
Per No. of 3 cubic yard dumpsters $1,162.57
Per No. of 6 cubic yard dumpsters $1,478.71
The Refuse and Recycling Development Impact Fee Fund was established November 1, 2005 by the City Council Resolution 05-63-R. The purpose of the Refuse/Recycling Impact Fee is to finance the acquisition of Refuse and Recycling Vehicles and Equipment in order to reduce the impacts on costs of additional Refuse and Recycling Vehicles and Equipment caused by new development. Additionally, the fee will continue to provide efficient and effective refuse and recycling services for the citizens of the City.

Basis: Estimated costs of solid waste trucks, containers and dumpsters, estimate of residential units, estimate of number of trucks needed for number of residences, cost of additonal commercial containers based on use.

12.L.a
Packet Pg. 405
Attachment: DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT 2021-22 (Finance: FY 2021/2022 Annual Report of Development Impact Fees)

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 12/6/2022

AGENDA SECTION: A

SUBJECT:

Administration: Council consideration of the renewal of the annual contract with Integrated Avian Solutions to continue to provide Falconer services in Downtown Hanford, for an amount not to exceed $53,600 for Calendar Year 2023.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council consider the contract proposal and, if approved, authorize the City Manager to renew the annual contract with Integrated Avian Solutions for an amount not to exceed $53,600, and approve an appropriation of $20,000.00 from the Central Parking and Improvement Fund and $33,600 from the General Fund to cover the expenditure.

BACKGROUND:

This renewal contract includes a $2,000 reduction in the contract price for 2022. Efficiencies gleaned over the past year allowed the contractor to modify the schedule and continue to provide services at a slightly lower overall cost.

Large concentrations of American crows gather to roost in downtown Hanford year-round, reaching the highest numbers in the fall and winter. They come from the surrounding agricultural areas and residential neighborhoods to begin assembling just before sunset. The birds eventually settle in to roost in street trees and on power lines, and during the course of the night leave an unsightly and unhygienic mess on the sidewalks, benches, restaurant tables, lamp posts, parked vehicles, and everything else beneath them. Pressure washing can be cost-prohibitive and does not address the root of the problem. With the move of Thursday Night Market Place into the Civic Park and the hugely successful Winter Wonderland, the City now has two signature events in the downtown that span 9 months out of the year. Those events amplify the need to keep the crows from roosting in the downtown area.

Up until 2020, the approach to dealing with a growing Crow problem in the Downtown has been largely reactive. Through the efforts of the Main Street Hanford organization, they were able to work with the Falconer to dramatically reduce the crow population in downtown Hanford. Main

13.A
Packet Pg. 406
Street Hanford continues to support the Crow Abatement and, accordingly, their board has voted to continue to support the program at a level of $10,000 for Calendar Year 2023.

Past results have proven that a year-long program with the firm Integrated Avian Solutions would be advantageous in relocating the Crow population to a more appropriate roosting and nesting environment away from local businesses.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Appropriations of $20,000 from Fund 025 Central Parking and Improvments and $33,600 from the General Fund.

ATTACHMENTS:

Hanford Crow Proposal_2023

13.A
Packet Pg. 407

INTEGRATED AVIAN SOLUTIONS Falconry-based Bird Abatement for Industry & Agriculture California, Oregon, Washington www.avian-solutions.com 845.532.5401 Bird Abatement Proposal 8 October 2022 PURCHASER City of Hanford PURCHASER’S REPRESENTATIVE Mario Cifuentez (City Manager) – 559.585.2516 Integrated Avian Solutions (Vendor) has successfully cleared roosting crows from an approximately 30-block area of downtown Hanford, CA for the past 3 winters. Due to the project’s success we began providing year-round services over an expanded project area in 2021. Our work has provided an effective solution to the long-standing crow problem in Hanford, and virtually eliminated unsightly crow droppings. The need for a year-round crow abatement program in Hanford is evident and has been requested by several prominent businesses, including FAST Credit Union, Smart & Final, Aria Health Clinic, and Staples. We propose continuing the year-round program in 2023 (January 1 – December 31). The project area (Page 5) includes the core of Hanford’s BID as well as Woodrow Wilson and the surrounding businesses along 11th Ave. This proposal offers considerable value, in that we can expand the project area and deliver the work year-round for less than a 25 % increase over the cost of our previous 6-month program. Our proposed Schedule of Services is outlined on Page 2. Given the success of our program in 2021 and 2022 we suggest this same scheduling. Services for year-round work will be billed at $400 per day and total program costs will not exceed $53,600 for the entirety of 2023. This is actually a slight reduction from our program costs in 2022. Thank you for the opportunity to present our proposal. We look forward to helping you keep your community clean again this year. Sincerely, Adam Baz Kort Clayton Project Manager Principal 845.532.5401 971.217.0080

13.A.a
Packet Pg. 408
Attachment: Hanford Crow Proposal_2023 (Admin: 2023 Crow Abatement Contract)

Hanford Crow Proposal 2023 Page 2

SCHEDULE OF SERVICES Month Shifts/week Total shifts Rate Cost January 3 12 400 4,800 February 3 12 400 4,800 March 3 14 400 5,600 April 3 13 400 5,200 May 2 9 400 3,600 June 2 9 400 3,600 July 2 8 400 3,200 August 2 9 400 3,600 September 2 9 400 3,600 October 3 13 400 5,200 November 3 13 400 5,200 December 3 13 400 5,200 $53,600

13.A.a
Packet Pg. 409
Attachment: Hanford Crow Proposal_2023 (Admin: 2023 Crow Abatement Contract)

Hanford Crow Proposal 2023 Page 3

SCOPE OF WORK EXISTING SITUATION Impressive numbers of American crows gather to roost in downtown Hanford year-round, reaching the highest numbers in the fall and winter. They come from the surrounding agricultural areas and residential neighborhoods to begin assembling just before sunset. The birds eventually settle in to roost in street trees and on power lines, and during the course of the night leave an unsightly and unhygienic mess on the sidewalks, benches, restaurant tables, lamp posts, parked vehicles, and everything else beneath them. Pressure washing can be cost-prohibitive and does not address the root of the problem. Crows have roosted in downtown Hanford for decades. However, the population has escalated in recent years to levels that are now deemed problematic by much of the affected business community. Local businesses have filed complaints with the city and with Main Street Hanford. Past efforts made by City Council and the Hanford Police Department–including shooting crows and amplifying predator calls–have been unsuccessful and inhumane. At the request of Main Street Hanford, we first initiated a falconry-based crow control program on 1 October 2018, covering 30 blocks in historic downtown Hanford. Upon arrival we found high numbers of crows roosting in street trees throughout the BID, with notable pockets around the McDonalds, Burger King, FAST Credit Union, train station, and car dealership on 11th Ave. Within weeks of initiating our services the crows were absent from the project area, and remained at bay for the duration of the program. We were able to achieve these same results the following 2 years. Businesses have been exceptionally pleased with the results. We are the only company to have successfully implemented a crow abatement project of this scale, and we look forward to bringing our experience and knowledge to further resolve your crow problem in Hanford. BIRD CONTROL PROCESS Bird abatement is accomplished through hazing, which is any number of methods used to intimidate and displace pest birds. Conventional hazing tools such as amplified predator calls, reflective mylar strips, raptor decoys, propane canons, and pyrotechnic noisemakers only yield temporary results because they quickly lose effectiveness as pest birds become acclimated. We use a falconry-based hazing program. This method works, and because birds have an intrinsic fear of raptors, efficacy does not diminish. The sight of a hawk or falcon flying with purpose always compels birds to abandon what they are doing and flee the area. Birds never become habituated to the threat posed by a live, free-flying raptor. Our abatement team will include two licensed falconers with Harris’s hawks. The team will strategically clear the project area by “sweeping” crows from primary roosting corridors. Specifically, a falconer will walk along a street occupied by crows and their hawk will fly from perch to perch (including trees, signs, buildings, and the falconer’s glove). This approach will elicit a strong antipredator response from the crows, which will retreat as the hawk approaches. The crows will quickly learn that the project area is no longer a comfortable or safe place for them to loiter or roost. Falconers will work both independently and in coordination to efficiently clear the entire project area during each shift. Our team will adapt tactics to achieve maximum impact each night. For example, each falconer may work separate areas with their hawks, or we may work together by deploying

13.A.a
Packet Pg. 410
Attachment: Hanford Crow Proposal_2023 (Admin: 2023 Crow Abatement Contract)

Hanford Crow Proposal 2023 Page 4

multiple hawks in the same area. We will coordinate between falconers and execute flanking maneuvers to steer retreating crows outside of the project area. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Vendor shall furnish the labor and falconry-trained raptors to assist in the abatement of roosting crows within the project area. Vendor is well experienced in bird abatement and possesses the relevant licenses and permit. All raptors used will be legally allowed for bird abatement. B. Services will commence on 1 January 2023. C. Services will include mobilization/demobilization to and from the project area, assessment and observation of pest birds, free flying of raptors, raptor feeding and maintenance, equipment maintenance, and tracking of wayward or lost raptors if required. Raptors are the primary method of bird abatement, but our falconers may use other tools such as noisemakers and visual deterrents (e.g., tree tappers, laser pointers, whistles, etc.). D. Abatement activities will begin around sunset when crows are staging to roost. Shifts will end once crows have retreated from the project area. Some pre-dawn shifts may also be implemented if needed. E. Vendor and Vendor’s falconers are independent contractors and are not employees of Purchaser. F. Purchaser shall assist Vendor in properly advertising the project and notifying relevant stakeholders (e.g., Police Department, City officials, local businesses, etc.) of the proposed activities. G. Vendor shall submit monthly invoices to Purchaser. Payment terms are Net 15. Invoices remaining unpaid beyond thirty (30) days may be subject to service charge of 5% per annum. H. This Proposal is conﬁdential and contains proprietary information and intellectual property of Vendor. The rates, schedule, scope-of-work or other elements may not be disclosed to anyone outside this agreement without the express written permission of Vendor. I. This agreement incorporates Vendor’s standard Terms and Conditions (available upon request).

13.A.a
Packet Pg. 411
Attachment: Hanford Crow Proposal_2023 (Admin: 2023 Crow Abatement Contract)

Hanford Crow Proposal 2023 Page 5

PROJECT AREA MAP

13.A.a
Packet Pg. 412
Attachment: Hanford Crow Proposal_2023 (Admin: 2023 Crow Abatement Contract)

Hanford Crow Proposal 2023 Page 6

DEMONSTRATION OF RESULTS The following images provide a before-and-after look at the crow situation during our work in Hanford. “Before” images are from October 2018, when the project began. “After” images are from December 2018, part way through our hazing efforts. The shaded green represents areas of crow activity, and the red line delineates the current project area.

13.A.a
Packet Pg. 413
Attachment: Hanford Crow Proposal_2023 (Admin: 2023 Crow Abatement Contract)

Hanford Crow Proposal 2023 Page 7

ABOUT US Integrated Avian Solutions is a network of talented falconers, experienced wildlife biologists, and passionate bird management professionals. We take a long and comprehensive view of every new opportunity and bring all our faculties and resources to bear with the singular goal of solving your bird problem. Our company is unique in that it is run and managed by falconers who also hold graduate degrees in wildlife biology. Thus, we offer a deep and unparalleled understanding of avian biology, which is invaluable for managing nuisance bird problems. Falconry is the foundation of our business and the most powerful bird management tool on the market. When everything else falls short, pest birds will not ignore the threat posed by a free-flying falcon or hawk. Our falconry programs are turn-key, natural, non-lethal, and sustainable. Kort Clayton (Principal) is a Master Falconer with 25 years of experience. He has delivered and managed bird abatement services for a broad spectrum of clients, including vineyards, berry farms, solid waste, commercial real estate, and heavy industry. Kort holds an M.Sc. in Wildlife Biology and is well versed in both state and federal wildlife regulations from his 15 years of environmental consulting experience. He was a former Director and President of the Oregon Falconers Association. Adam Baz (Project Manager) is a licensed falconer and holds an M.Sc. in Avian Biology from Portland State University. He has worked as a wildlife biologist for over 10 years throughout California and Oregon, focusing on birds and human-wildlife conflicts. He delivers abatement services and manages contracts throughout central and southern California.

13.A.a
Packet Pg. 414
Attachment: Hanford Crow Proposal_2023 (Admin: 2023 Crow Abatement Contract)

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 12/6/2022

AGENDA SECTION: B

SUBJECT:

Public Works: Presentation and Council consideration of authorization for a water conservation education and incentive program consisting of three sub programs: 1) Outreach education campaign, 2) Installation of sign boards on all City Refuse trucks, and 3) a turf replacement program from $300,000 previously allocated by City Council from the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA).

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, authorize staff to implement a water conservation education and incentive program. The overall program will consist of the following three primary sub-programs and their associated cost estimates.

1. $50,000: Conduct an extensive media campaign, including social media, print ads, and other communication methods across several formats to educate and encourage water conservation.

2. $75,000: Installation of poster boards on all City Refuse trucks. The hardware will be fixed to the trucks and allow the message poster to be changed as desired.

3. $175,000: Turf replacement incentives to commercial businesses, including homeowner’s associations, landscape districts, and multi-family apartment complexes.

It is further recommended that Council authorize the City Manager to redistribute funds between the projects as necessary based on actual costs while accomplishing the primary goals of each.

SUMMARY:

The City of Hanford has been allocated $13,077,040 of ARPA funds from the U.S. Department of Treasury Corona Virus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund. Staff has previously submitted all of the required documentation and in July 2021, the City received its first allocation in the amount of $6,538,870. The City received its second installment in July 2022.

13.B
Packet Pg. 415

In September 2021, Council approved initial allocations of ARPA funding with additional approvals in June 2022, including $300,000 for
· “Water: Water conservation incentive program (to be developed, up to $500 per house, approximately 600 households)
The turf replacement program will be based on a rebate per square foot basis. Staff originally intended this program to target residential properties. That changed when the Governor issued his executive order (EO) prohibiting watering of “non-functional” turf. We are finding that many commercial customers are unwilling to comply with the EO out of concern that dead landscaping will reflect poorly on their business. An incentive program will help ease the financial burden of transitioning to drought tolerant species and xeriscape. Staff believes targeting the commercial sector will also have a larger impact for the community as a whole.

Staff has developed the proposed program to have an immediate and long-term impact on water consumption throughout the City, to develop the infrastructure for public messaging, and to make it more palatable to comply with emergency drought restrictions (specifically, the Governor’s executive order prohibiting the watering of “non-functional” turf), while mitigating against the “dead landscape” appearance.

The media campaign is self-descriptive and will change throughout the year based on then- current restrictions.

The installation of the poster board hardware on City Refuse trucks will cost approximately $2,500 per vehicle, but a majority of those costs are one-time costs for the installation of the hardware. Thereafter, it will be very economical to develop and print whatever message the city needs to convey at the time, whether that is “save water”, “recycle”, or “vote" etc. The City’s refuse fleet is about 25 vehicles strong, and these trucks go up and down every street throughout the City at least once per week. This is an inexpensive way to repeatedly convey a variety of messages in a short amount of time. Other cities have seen success with this type of system.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The City has received $13,077,740 in ARPA funds from the Department of Treasury. Council has directed that $300,000 of these funds be used for water conservation programs. The programs presented and approved by Council will be administered with existing staff.

ATTACHMENTS:

Truck poster

13.B
Packet Pg. 416

13.B.a
Packet Pg. 417
Attachment: Truck poster (PW: ARPA funded Water

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 12/6/2022

AGENDA SECTION: A

SUBJECT:

Council Future Agenda Items

FISCAL IMPACT:

ATTACHMENTS:

Council Future Agenda Items

14.A
Packet Pg. 418

Council Future Agenda Items
Originated
Date Item Originator Staff Lead Date Estimate
8/2/2022 Discussion regarding a process to
formally oppose any movement of
groundwater outside of the jurisdiction
of Kings County and update on
Groundwater
Council
Consensus
Jason Waters 12/20/2022
11/29/2022 Discussion regarding the 2023 State
Legislative Platform
City
Manager
Mario Cifuentez 12/20/2022
11/30/2022 Review of 2022 Federal Advocacy
efforts and Discussion regarding the
2023 Federal Legislative Platform
City
Manager
Mario Cifuentez 1/17/2022

14.A.a
Packet Pg. 419
Attachment: Council Future Agenda Items (Council: Future Agenda Items)

Hanford City CouncilDecember 6, 2022

Hanford City Council
December 6, 2022