Hanford City Council
April 4, 2023

CITY OF HANFORD

COMBINING STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS (continued)
JUNE 30, 2022
86 Fleet
Building Management Medical
Fund Fund Fund Totals
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and investments 1,151,965$ 14,443,993$ 866,557$ 23,993,645$ Receivables, net - 890 77,855 78,745 Deposits - - - 175,000 Inventory - 969,531 - 969,531 Prepaid expenses 180 2,207 - 2,387 Total Current Assets 1,152,145 15,416,621 944,412 25,219,308 Noncurrent assets
Capital assets:

Building and improvements 254,506 26,191 - 280,697 Machinery and equipment 604,908 15,363,209 - 17,557,998 Accumulated depreciation (225,369) (9,066,388) - (9,910,672) Total Capital Assets (Net of Accumulated Depreciation) 634,045 6,323,012 - 7,928,023 Total Noncurrent Assets 634,045 6,323,012 - 7,928,023 Total Assets 1,786,190 21,739,633 944,412 33,147,331

DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES
Deferred outflows related to pensions 448,728 613,636 - 1,247,328 Total Deferred Outflows of Resources 448,728 613,636 - 1,247,328

LIABILITIES
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable 10,455 153,554 46,185 392,956 Salaries and benefits payable 1,590 2,710 85,894 998,265 Compensated absences - current portion 2,582 5,040 - 7,622 Bonds and notes payable - current portion 15,540 22,003 - 44,088 Due to other funds - - - 298,685 Total Current Liabilities 30,167 183,307 132,079 1,741,616 Noncurrent Liabilities
Compensated absences payable 19,337 37,743 - 57,080 Claims payable - - - 5,589,000 Net pension liability 216,504 195,995 - 472,931 Bonds and notes payable 378,000 535,211 - 1,072,415 Total Noncurrent Liabilities 613,841 768,949 - 7,191,426 Total Liabilities 644,008 952,256 132,079 8,933,042

DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
Deferred inflows related to pensions 292,853 410,732 - 833,978 Total Deferred Inflows of Resources 292,853 410,732 - 833,978

NET POSITION (DEFICIT)
Net investment in capital assets 634,045 6,323,012 - 7,928,023 Unrestricted 664,012 14,667,269 812,333 16,699,616 Total Net Position (Deficit) 1,298,057$ 20,990,281$ 812,333$ 24,627,639$

CITY OF HANFORD

COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN NET POSITION

INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
87 City Risk Computer
Payroll Management Maintenance
Fund Fund Fund

OPERATING REVENUES
Charges for services -$ 1,207,026$ 624,440$ Other revenues 1,393 3,742 - Total Operating Revenues 1,393 1,210,768 624,440

OPERATING EXPENSES
Personnel services - - 239,913 Services and supplies 3,440 1,789,152 356,832 Depreciation - - 233,660 Total Operating Expenses 3,440 1,789,152 830,405 Operating Income (Loss) (2,047) (578,384) (205,965)

NON-OPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES)
Interest income 5,046 46,174 2,920 Interest expense - - (1,109) Unrealized gain (loss) on investments (34,898) (190,126) (2,996) Total Non-operating Revenue (Expenses) (29,852) (143,952) (1,185) Income (Loss) Before Capital Contributions and Transfers (31,899) (722,336) (207,150) Transfers in/(out) - 750,000 - Change in Net Position (Deficit) (31,899) 27,664 (207,150) Net Position (Deficit), Beginning of Year 27,133 707,295 1,061,190 Prior Period Adjustment - (57,265) - Net Position (Deficit), Beginning of Year (Restated) 27,133 650,030 1,061,190 Net Position (Deficit), End of Year (4,766)$ 677,694$ 854,040$

CITY OF HANFORD

COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN NET POSITION INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS (continued)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
88 Fleet
Building Management Medical
Fund Fund Fund Totals

OPERATING REVENUES
Charges for services 1,205,942$ 5,136,192$ 3,334,918$ 11,508,518$ Other revenues - 9,315 - 14,450 Total Operating Revenues 1,205,942 5,145,507 3,334,918 11,522,968

OPERATING EXPENSES
Personnel services 427,724 666,230 - 1,333,867 Services and supplies 396,118 2,128,309 3,337,010 8,010,861 Depreciation 50,294 932,249 - 1,216,203 Total Operating Expenses 874,136 3,726,788 3,337,010 10,560,931 Operating Income (Loss) 331,806 1,418,719 (2,092) 962,037

NON-OPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES)
Interest income 9,900 95,054 3,201 162,295 Interest expense (2,632) (3,727) - (7,468) Unrealized gain (loss) on investments (34,492) (468,987) (21,907) (753,406) Total Non-operating Revenue (Expenses) (27,224) (377,660) (18,706) (598,579) Income (Loss) Before Capital Contributions and Transfers 304,582 1,041,059 (20,798) 363,458 Transfers in/(out) (71,901) (288,332) - 389,767 Change in Net Position (Deficit) 232,681 752,727 (20,798) 753,225 Net Position (Deficit), Beginning of Year 1,009,672 20,492,406 1,517,587 24,815,283 Prior Period Adjustment 55,704 (254,852) (684,456) (940,869) Net Position (Deficit), Beginning of Year (Restated) 1,065,376 20,237,554 833,131 23,874,414 Net Position (Deficit), End of Year 1,298,057$ 20,990,281$ 812,333$ 24,627,639$

CITY OF HANFORD

COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
89 City Risk Computer
Payroll Management Maintenance
Fund Fund Fund
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

Cash received for current services 2,766$ 1,401,293$ 624,597$ Cash received for other operating revenues 12,254 (46,258) - Cash paid for services and supplies (3,440) (1,770,507) (272,949) Cash paid for salaries and benefits 682,308 - (448,140) Net Cash Provided (Used) by
Operating Activities 693,888 (415,472) (96,492) Cash Flows from Non-Capital
Financing Activities:

Transfers (to)/from other funds - 750,000 - Loans from/(to) other funds - - - Net Cash Provided (Used) by
Non-capital Financing Activities - 750,000 - Cash Flows from Capital and
Related Financing Activities:

Capital expenditures - - (98,422) Proceeds from the issuance of debt - - 164,640 Proceeds from the sale of capital assets - - - Net Cash Provided (Used) by Capital
and Related Financing Activities - - 66,218 Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

Unrealized gain (loss) on investments (34,898) (190,126) (2,996) Interest received 5,046 (11,091) 2,920 Net Cash Provided (Used) by
Investing Activities (29,852) (201,217) (76) Net Increase (Decrease) in
Cash and Investments 664,036 133,311 (30,350) Cash and Investments, Beginning of Year 261,040 6,103,885 399,208 Cash and Investments, End of Year 925,076$ 6,237,196$ 368,858$ Reconciliation to Statement of Net Position:

Cash and investments 925,076$ 6,237,196$ 368,858$ Total Cash and Investments 925,076$ 6,237,196$ 368,858$

CITY OF HANFORD

COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS (continued)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
90 Fleet
Building Management Medical
Fund Fund Fund Totals
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

Cash received for current services 1,207,492$ 5,151,119$ 3,252,837$ 11,640,104$ Cash received for other operating revenues - 9,315 - (24,689) Cash paid for services and supplies (405,571) (2,369,837) (3,193,964) (8,016,268) Cash paid for salaries and benefits (915,044) (1,369,425) - (2,050,301) Net Cash Provided (Used) by
Operating Activities (113,123) 1,421,172 58,873 1,548,846 Cash Flows from Non-Capital
Financing Activities:

Transfers (to)/from other funds (4,797) (288,332) - 456,871 Loans from/(to) other funds - 1,967,592 - 1,967,592 Net Cash Provided (Used) by
Non-capital Financing Activities (4,797) 1,679,260 - 2,424,463 Cash Flows from Capital and
Related Financing Activities:

Capital expenditures (304,427) (160,984) - (563,833) Proceeds from the issuance of debt 390,908 553,487 - 1,109,035 Proceeds from the sale of capital assets - 55,118 - 55,118 Net Cash Provided (Used) by Capital
and Related Financing Activities 86,481 447,621 - 600,320 Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

Unrealized gain (loss) on investments (45,892) (557,949) (7,357) (839,218) Interest received 9,900 95,054 3,201 105,030 Net Cash Provided (Used) by
Investing Activities (35,992) (462,895) (4,156) (734,188) Net Increase (Decrease) in
Cash and Investments (67,431) 3,085,158 54,717 3,839,441 Cash and Investments, Beginning of Year 1,219,396 11,358,835 811,840 20,154,204 Cash and Investments, End of Year 1,151,965$ 14,443,993$ 866,557$ 23,993,645$ Reconciliation to Statement of Net Position:

Cash and investments 1,151,965$ 14,443,993$ 866,557$ 23,993,645$ Total Cash and Investments 1,151,965$ 14,443,993$ 866,557$ 23,993,645$

CITY OF HANFORD

COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS (continued)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
91 City Risk Computer
Payroll Management Maintenance
Fund Fund Fund
Reconciliation of Operating Income (Loss) to Net
Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities:

Operating income (loss) (2,047)$ (578,384)$ (205,965)$ Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to
net cash provided (used) by operating activities:

Depreciation - - 233,660 (Increase) decrease in:

Receivables, net 2,766 7,267 157 Deposits - (50,000) - Inventory - - - Deferred outflow of resources - - (127,058) Due to/from other funds - - 75,940 Accounts payable 10,861 18,645 7,943 Salaries and benefits payable 682,308 - (6,879) Compensated absences - - - Net pension liability - - (190,208) Deferred inflow of resources - - 115,918 Claims payable - 187,000 - Total Adjustments 695,935 162,912 109,473 Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities 693,888$ (415,472)$ (96,492)$

CITY OF HANFORD

COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS (continued)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
92 Fleet
Building Management Medical
Fund Fund Fund Totals
Reconciliation of Operating Income (Loss) to Net
Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities:

Operating income (loss) 331,806$ 1,418,719$ (2,092)$ 962,037$ Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to
net cash provided (used) by operating activities:

Depreciation 50,294 932,249 - 1,216,203 (Increase) decrease in:

Receivables, net 1,550 14,927 (82,081) (55,414) Deposits - - - (50,000) Inventory - (262,532) - (262,532) Deferred outflow of resources (297,083) (425,635) - (849,776) Due to/from other funds - (42,054) - 33,886 Accounts payable (9,453) 63,058 57,152 148,206 Salaries and benefits payable (16,821) (23,825) 85,894 720,677 Compensated absences 287 (4,869) - (4,582) Net pension liability (444,739) (637,183) - (1,272,130) Deferred inflow of resources 271,036 388,317 - 775,271 Claims payable - - - 187,000 Total Adjustments (444,929) 2,453 60,965 586,809 Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities (113,123)$ 1,421,172$ 58,873$ 1,548,846$

CITY OF HANFORD

COMBINING STATEMENT OF FIDUCIARY NET POSITION

TRUST AND CUSTODIAL FUNDS
JUNE 30, 2022
93 Renters' Miscellaneous
Civil Insurance COE Park Deposits
Subpoena Deposits Deposits Trust Total
ASSETS
Cash and investments 44,055$ 3,726$ 471$ 1,407,039$ 1,455,291$ Accounts receivable - - - 17,095 17,095 Total Assets 44,055 3,726 471 1,424,134 1,472,386

LIABILITIES
Accounts payable - - - 834,369 834,369 Deposits held for others 115,716 836 - 555,162 671,714 Total Liabilities 115,716 836 - 1,389,531 1,506,083

NET POSITION
Restricted (71,661) 2,890 471 34,603 (33,697) Total Net Position (71,661)$ 2,890$ 471$ 34,603$ (33,697)$

CITY OF HANFORD

COMBINING STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FIDUCIARY NET POSITION

TRUST AND CUSTODIAL FUNDS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
94 Renters' Miscellaneous
Civil Insurance COE Park Deposits
Subpoena Deposits Deposits Trust Total

ADDITIONS
Other additions -$ 53$ -$ 42,888$ 42,941$ Total Additions - 53 - 42,888 42,941

DEDUCTIONS
General government 2,361 46 - 6,804 9,211 Unrealized (gain) loss on investments (502) 77 14 40,850 40,439 Total Deductions 1,859 123 14 47,654 49,650 Change in Fiduciary Net Position (1,859) (70) (14) (4,766) (6,709) Net Position, Beginning of Year, as Previously Reported (53,748) 2,960 485 128,005 77,702 Prior Period Adjustments (16,054) - - (88,636) (104,690) Net Position, Beginning of Year, Restated (69,802) 2,960 485 39,369 (26,988) Net Position, End of Year (71,661)$ 2,890$ 471$ 34,603$ (33,697)$

SINGLE AUDIT REPORTS

7473 N. INGRAM AVE., SUITE 102 ⬧ FRESNO, CA 93711
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

P (559) 412-7576 ⬧ F (559) 493-5325 ⬧ WWW.HHCCPAS.COM

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE

AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH

GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS

The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
City of Hanford
Hanford, California

We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States , the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of City of Hanford, California (the City), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2022, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated March 30, 2023.

Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
In planning and performing our audit of the f inancial statements, we considered the City’s internal control over financial reporting (internal control) as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial state ments, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control.

A deficiency in internal control exists when the des ign or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements, on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.

Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or, significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies may exist that were not identified.

Report on Compliance and Other Matters
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City’s financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the financial statements.

However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards.

96 Purpose of This Report
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose.

HUDSON HENDERSON & COMPANY, INC.

Fresno, California
March 30, 2023

7473 N. INGRAM AVE., SUITE 102 ⬧ FRESNO, CA 93711
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

P (559) 412-7576 ⬧ F (559) 493-5325 ⬧ WWW.HHCCPAS.COM

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT ON COMPLIANCE FOR EACH MAJOR FEDERAL PROGRAM AND ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE; AND REPORT ON THE SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS

REQUIRED BY THE UNIFORM GUIDANCE
The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
City of Hanford
Hanford, California
Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program
Opinion on Each Major Federal Program
We have audited the City of Hanford, California’s (the City) compliance with the types of compliance requirements identified as subject to audit in the OMB Compliance Supplement that could have a direct and material effect on each of the City’s major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2022. The City’s major federal programs are identified in the summary of auditors’ results section of the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs.

In our opinion, the City complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on each of its major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2022.

Basis for Opinion on Each Major Federal Program
We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and the audit requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Our responsibilities under those standards and the Uniform Guidance are further described in the Auditors’ Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section of our report.

We are required to be independent of the City and to meet our othe r ethical responsibilities, in accordance with relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion on compliance for each major federal pr ogram. Our audit does not provide a legal determination of the City’s compliance with the compliance requirements referred to above.

Responsibilities of Management for Compliance
Management is responsible for compliance with the requirements referred to a bove and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of effective internal control over compliance with the requirements of laws, statutes, regulations, rules, and provisions of contracts or grant agreements applicable to the City’s federal programs.

Auditors’ Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether material noncompliance with the compliance requirements referred to above occurred, whether due to fraud or error, and express an opinion on the City’s compliance based on our audit. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, Government Audit ing Standards , and the Uniform Guidance will always detect material noncompliance when it exists. The risk of not detecting material noncompliance resulting from fraud is higher than for that resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Noncompliance with the compliance requirements referred to above is considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, it would inf luence the judgment made by a reasonable user of the report on compliance about the City’s compliance with the requirements of each major federal program as a whole.

98 In performing an audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, Government Auditing Standards, and the Uniform Guidance, we:
• Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. • Identify and assess the risks of material noncompliance, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the City’s compliance with the compliance requirements referred to above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. • Obtain an understanding of the City’s internal control over compliance relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control over compliance. Accordingly, no su ch opinion is expressed.

We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and any significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in internal control over compliance that we identified during the audit.

Report on Internal Control over Compliance
A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis.

A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance wi th a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program that is less severe than a material weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.

Our consideration of i nternal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the Auditor s’ Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section above and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be material w eaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal control over compliance. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined above. However, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal control over compliance may exist that were not identified.

Our audit was not designed for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.

Purpose of Report
The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirem ents of the Uniform Guidance.

Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose.

HUDSON HENDERSON & COMPANY, INC.

Fresno, California
March 30, 2023

CITY OF HANFORD

SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
The accompanying notes are an integral part to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards. 99 Pass-
Supplemental Through to
Federal Identifying Sub- Federal
Federal Grantor/ Pass-through Grantor/ Program or Cluster Title CFDA No. Number recipients Expenditures

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Direct Programs
CDBG - Entitlement Grants Cluster
CDBG/Entitlement Grants FY18 14.218 B-17-MC-0061 -$ 729,594$ Total CDBG - Entitlement Grants Cluster - 729,594 TOTAL U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT - 729,594 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Direct Program
Bulletproof Vest Partnership Program 16.607 - 20,414 TOTAL U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE - 20,414
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
Direct Program
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds 21.027 - 2,986,859 TOTAL U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY - 2,986,859 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Direct Program
Cooperative Fire Protection Agreement 10.703 - 147,275 TOTAL U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE - 147,275 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
Direct Program
National Park Service Conservation, Protection, Outreach and Education 15.954 - 123,767 TOTAL U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE - 123,767 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Passed through California Department of Transportation
Highway Planning and Construction Cluster
Highway Planning and Construction 20.205 CML-5091(064) - 2,240 Highway Planning and Construction 20.205 CML-5091(065) - 36,600 Highway Planning and Construction 20.205 CML-5091(066) 37,698 Total Highway Planning and Construction Cluster - 76,538 TOTAL U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - 76,538 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Direct Programs
Disaster Grants - Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) 97.036 - 18,728 Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) 97.083 - 30,219 Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) 97.067 - 86,965 TOTAL U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY - 135,912 TOTAL EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS -$ 4,220,359$

CITY OF HANFORD

NOTES TO THE SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS 100

NOTE 1 – GENERAL

The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards presents all the activity of all the federal award programs of the City of Hanford , California (the City) for the year ended June 30, 2022. The City reporting entity is defined in Note 1 to the City’s basic financial statements. Federal awards received directly from federal agencies as well as federal awards passed through other government agencies are included on the schedule.

NOTE 2 – BASIS OF ACCOUNTING

Consistent with the City’s method of filing federal financial reports, the accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards is prepared using the accrual basis method of accounting. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with th e requirements of Title 2 U.S., Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance).

Therefore, some of the amounts presented in this schedule may differ f rom amounts presented or used in the preparation of the basic financial statements. The amounts reported in the accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards agree, in all material respects, to amounts reported within the City’s financial stateme nts.

NOTE 3 – RELATIONSHIP TO FEDERAL FINANCIAL REPORTS

Amounts reported in the accompanying schedule agree with the amounts reported in the related periodic federal financial reports.

NOTE 4 – CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE (CFDA)

The CFDA numbers included in the accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards were determined based on the program name, review of the grant or contract information and the Office of Management and Budget’s Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance.

NOTE 5 – PASS-THROUGH ENTITY IDENTIFYING NUMBERS

When Federal awards were received from a pass -through entity, the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards show, if available, the identifying number assigned by the pass -through entity. When no ident ifying number is shown, the City has either determined that no identifying number is assigned for the program, or the City was unable to obtain an identifying number from the pass-through entity.

NOTE 6 – INDIRECT COST RATE

The City has elected not to use the 10-percent de minimus indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance.

CITY OF HANFORD

SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
101

SECTION I – SUMMARY OF AUDITORS’ RESULTS

Financial Statements
Type of auditors’ report issued:

Internal control over financial reporting:
·     Material weakness identified? Yes X No
·     Significant deficiency(ies) identified that are not considered to be material weaknesses? Yes X No
Noncompliance material to financial statements noted? Yes X No Federal Awards
Internal control over major federal programs:
·     Material weakness identified? Yes X No
·     Significant deficiency(ies) identified that are not considered to be material weaknesses? Yes X No
Noncompliance material to federal awards? Yes X No
Yes X No
Type of auditors’ report issued on compliance for major Federal programs:

Identification of major programs:

CFDA Number Name of Federal Program or Cluster

21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Dollar threshold used to distinguish
between Type A and Type B programs:

Auditee qualified as a low-risk auditee? Yes X No
Unmodified
Unmodified
$750,000
Any audit findings disclosed that are required to be reported in accordance with 2CFR Section 200.516(a)?

CITY OF HANFORD
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS (continued)
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022
102

SECTION II – FINANCIAL STATEMENT FINDINGS

There were no reportable financial statement findings to be reported in accordance with Government Auditing Standards.

SECTION III – FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS

There were no federal award findings or questioned costs to be reported in accordance with the Uniform Guidance.

CITY OF HANFORD

SUMMARY SCHEDULE OF PRIOR YEAR FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2021
103

SECTION II – FINANCIAL STATEMENT FINDINGS

There were no reportable financial statement findings to be reported in accordance with Government Auditing Standards.

SECTION III – FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS

There were no federal award findings or questioned costs to be reported in accordance with the Uniform Guidance.

APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT REPORT

7473 N. INGRAM AVE., SUITE 102 ⬧ FRESNO, CA 93711
_______________________________________________________________________________________________

P (559) 412-7576 ⬧ F (559) 493-5325 ⬧ WWW.HHCCPAS.COM

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS’ REPORT ON APPLYING

AGREED-UPON PROCEDURES RELATED TO THE

ARTICLE XIII-B APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT

To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
City of Hanford
Hanford, California
We have performed the procedures enumerated below to the accompanying calculation of the Appropriations Limit of the City of Hanford, California (the City) for the year ended June 30, 2022. These procedures, which were agreed to by the City and recommended by the California Committee on Municipal Accounting (CCMA) (as presented in the CCMA White Paper entitled Agreed-upon Procedures Applied to the Appropriations Limitation Prescribed by Article XIII-B of the California Constitution) were performed solely to assist the City in meeting the requirements of Section

1.5 of Article XIII-B of the California Constitution. The City’s management is responsible for the Appropriations Limit Calculation.

The sufficiency of these procedures is solely the responsibility of those parties specified in this report. Consequently, we make no representation regarding the sufficiency of the procedures described below either for the purpose for which this report has been requested or for any other purpose.

The procedures and associated findings are as follows:
1) We obtained the City’s calculation of the June 30, 2022 appropriations limit and compared the limit and annual adjustment factors included in the calculation to the limit and annual adjustment factors that were adopt ed by the resolution of the City Council. We also compared the population and inflation factors included in the aforementioned worksheet to those that were selected by a recorded vote of the City Council.

Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures. 2) For the accompany calculation, we added last year’s limit to the total adjustments and compared the resulting amount to this year’s limit.

Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures. 3) We compared the current year information used to determine the current year limit to the appropriations limit calculation prepared by the City and to the information provided by the State Department of Finance.

Finding: In the prior year, w hen comparing the population change rate, we noted that the City utilized the incorrect rate. This resulted in an adjustment in the prior year and consequently the ending limit for the current year being overstated by $ 134,276. Per discussion with manageme nt, this came to light after the adoption of the current year limit and has since been corrected on the subsequent year’s limit. 4) We compared the prior year appropriations limit calculation presented in the accompanying appropriations limit calculation to the prior year appropriations limit adopted by the City Council for the prior year.

Finding: No exceptions were noted as a result of our procedures.

105

This agreed-upon procedures engagement was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. We were not engaged to and did not conduct an audit, the objective of which would be the expression of an opinion, on the accompanying Appropriations Limit Calculation.

Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. Had we performed additional procedures, other matters might have come to our attention that would have been reported to you. No procedures have been performed with respect to the determination of the appropriation limit for the base year, as defined by Article XIII -B of the California Constitution.

This report is intended solely for the use of the City Council and City’s management and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. However, this r eport is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited.

HUDSON HENDERSON & COMPANY, INC.

Fresno, California
March 30, 2023

CITY OF HANFORD

APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT SCHEDULE
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2022

106

Appropriations Limit, fiscal year 2021, as revised 71,934,925$ Adjustment Factors:

Per Capita Personal Income Change 5.73%
Population change - City of Hanford 1.36%
Per Capita converted to a ratio 1.0573
Population converted to a ratio 1.0136
Calculation of factor FY 21-22 1.0717
Annual adjustment in dollars 5,157,734
Appropriations limit, fiscal year 2022, as revised 77,092,659$

12.B.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 4/4/2023 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Approval of the Minutes of the February 7, 2023 Meeting

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: Approve the minutes from the February 7, 2023 meeting.

BACKGROUND:

FISCAL IMPACT:

ATTACHMENTS:

1. February 7, 2023

City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes
February 7, 2023 7:00 PM
Council Chambers
400 N. Douty St.

5:00 PM CALL TO ORDER STUDY SESSION AND CLOSED SESSION:

Mayor Paden called the study session and closed session to order at 5:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL BY THE CITY CLERK:

Present: Absent:

Council Member Lou Martinez
Council Member Mark Kairis
Council Member Travis Paden
Council Member Kalish Morrow
Council Member Diane Sharp

PUBLIC COMMENT:

Comments from the public are limited to items listed on the agenda (GC 54954.3a). A maximum of three minutes is allowed for each speaker. Please begin your comments by stating your name and providing your city of residence.

Dennis Ham asked if there would be an oversite committee for the Connectivity Plan and Cross Valley Corridor Rail Service project. Mr. Leavitt's responded.

Angie Dow, KART Executive Director, commented on the connectivity plan and spoke in support of the project.

Dave Ayers commented on the history of the High Speed Rail project. Mr. Ayers also commented on the federal legislative activity presentation and suggested the tip sheet be available to the public.

STUDY SESSION:

A. Community Development: Sustainable Transportation Grant for HSR Station Transit-Oriented Development and Connectivity Plan and Cross Valley Corridor Rail Service Dan Leavitt of the San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Commission (teleconference) discussed the joint application for a Sustainable Transportation Grant for the High Speed Rail Station Transit-Oriented Development and Connectivity Plan and Cross Valley Corridor Rail Service. He also discussed partnerships, the details of the grant, and public outreach. Deputy City Manager Waters discussed the project deliverables. Staff and Mr. Levitt's answered questions from the Council. This presentation was informational only. No formal action was taken.

B. Administration: Council review of 2022 Federal Advocacy efforts and Discussion regarding the

2023 Federal Legislative Platform
Greg Burns of Thorn Run Partners provided an overview of federal legislative activity for the 2022 season and highlighted the efforts they made in the past year to assist the city in securing funding and applying for grants. Mr.

Burns also discussed what to watch for in 2023 and how it will impact local governments. Mr.Burns and City Manager Cifuentez answered questions from the Council.

The Council convened to closed session at 6:07 p.m.

CLOSED SESSION FOR DISCUSSION OF THE FOLLOWING:

A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (GC 54956.9 (d)(4))

1 Potential Case.

B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (GC 54956.9 (d)(2))

1 Potential Case.

CALL TO ORDER REGULAR SESSION:

Mayor Paden called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.

ROLL CALL:

Present: Absent:

Council Member Lou Martinez
Council Member Mark Kairis
Council Member Travis Paden
Council Member Kalish Morrow
Council Member Diane Sharp

INVOCATION:

The invocation was led by Pastor Bobby Guerra.

FLAG SALUTE:

The flag salute was led by Vice Mayor Kairis.

COUNCIL REPORTS/GENERAL REPORTS:

Brief information-only reports from City Council and/or Staff, including committee reports and reports by City Council related to meetings attended at City expenses (AB1234).

The Council discussed the meetings and events they attended.

PUBLIC COMMENT:

This is the time for citizens to comment on subject matters within the jurisdiction of the Hanford City Council. This is also the public’s opportunity to request an item from the Consent Calendar be pulled for discussion purposes or to comment on any item on the agenda. State law does not allow the Council to discuss or take action on issues not on the agenda, except that members of the Council or staff may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons exercising their public testimony rights (Gov. Code sec. 54954.2). A maximum of three minutes is allowed for each speaker. Please begin your comments by stating your name and providing your city of residence.

Nanette Vilarillo, Kings United Way Executive Director, provided a handout to the Council and invited them to the Administrative Professional's Day Event.

Cheyen Strawn expressed his concerns regarding the cost of the Police Chief's new patrol car.

Bob Ramos requested to pull consent item H, for separate discussion. He also expressed his concerns about Chief Server's patrol car, and the traffic circle project.

Noor Memon commented on the Bastille.

Lisa Chavarin requested more field time for the Hanford Youth Softball League.

Adam Medirios spoke in opposition to the traffic circle project.

William Harmon expressed his concerns regarding graffiti, safety, and the traffic circle project.

Elena Anzoleaga provided her background, and spoke in opposition to the traffic circle project.

Larry Faria thanked the Council for their transparency. He also expressed his concerns regarding the recent settlement with Helena.

William Ochoa commented on the traffic circle project.

Dubby Bookout, owner of Hanford Jewelry and Loan, expressed his concerns regarding the traffic circle project and spoke in opposition to the project's location.

Henery Ramirez, spoke in opposition to the traffic circle project.

Sarah Evans commented on the municipal code regarding basketball hoops. She said her hoop is in a safe community and they are not an issue in her neighborhood.

Colleen Aduttle spoke in opposition to the traffic circle project.

Art Brieno expressed his concerns regarding the staff report about the purchase of a right of way on 12th and Hume.

Mike Pepe expressed his concerns regarding projects that will affect small businesses. He also expressed his concerns regarding the homeless issue throughout the city.

Joe Castaneda, Parks and Recreation Commissioner, commented on Consent Item H, and asked several questions regarding the staff report.

Nathan Odom, provided the Council with a handout and gave a speech about his company, Ssussdriad.

CONSENT CALENDAR:

Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these matters unless a request is made and then the item will be removed from the Consent Calendar to be discussed and voted upon by a separate motion.

The Council pulled items C, D, G, H, and I.

Motion to approve the consent calendar except for the items pulled for separate consideration.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

Passed (UNANIMOUS)
Council Member Diane Sharp
Council Member Kalish Morrow
Diane Sharp, Mark Kairis, Kalish Morrow, Travis Paden, Lou Martinez

A. Procedural Waiver: Waive reading in full of resolutions and ordinances and approval and adoption of same by reading title the only.

B. City Attorney: Adoption of Resolution 23-01-R declaring the City-owned property located on Kensington Way, between Richardson Way and Leland Way (APN 008-192-011) to be surplus property and adoption of Notice of Exemption 2021-95.

C. Public Works: Approval of the Notice of Completion for the Mussel Slough Pump Installation Project, and Authorization for the mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest and file said Notice with the Kings County Recorder's Office.

D. Public Works: Approval of the Notice of Completion for the Emma Lee Lane Reconstruction Project, and Authorization for the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest and file said notice with the Kings County Recorders Office.

PULLED CONSENT ITEMS:

A. Administration: Introduction of Ordinance No. 23-04, Amending Chapters 2.32 and 2.28 of the Municipal Code to create Alternate seats on both the Parks & Recreation and Parking & Traffic Commissions.
[Item C]

Pulled by Council Member Martinez for clarification to the public. City Manager Cifuentez presented the staff report for the Council's review and approval.

Motion to approve.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

Passed (UNANIMOUS)
Council Member Lou Martinez
Vice Mayor Mark Kairis
Diane Sharp, Mark Kairis, Kalish Morrow, Travis Paden, Lou Martinez

B. Community Development: Adoption of Resolution No. 22-03-R, Authorizing the City Manager to Apply For, Accept, And Appropriate CalHome Grant Funds, From the California Department Of Housing And Community Development's 2023 Homeownership Super Notice Of Funding Availability, in An Amount Not To Exceed $5 million.
[Item D]

Pulled by Council Member Martinez for clarification to the public. Administrative Analyst Sandra Lerma presented the staff report for the Council's review and approval.

Motion to approve.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

Passed (UNANIMOUS)
Council Member Diane Sharp
Council Member Lou Martinez
Diane Sharp, Mark Kairis, Kalish Morrow, Travis Paden, Lou Martinez

C. Public Works: Approval of a reimbursement to Lennar Homes for construction to complete the east side of Mustang Drive to the ultimate street width providing storm drainage improvements from Grangeville Boulevard north and along the frontage of the existing city basin located at the southeast corner of Mustang Drive and Berkshire Lane. [Item G]

Pulled by Mayor Paden. Mr. Paden recused himself from voting on the item.

Motion to approve.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

ABSTAIN:

Passed
Council Member Kalish Morrow
Council Member Diane Sharp
Diane Sharp, Mark Kairis, Kalish Morrow, Lou Martinez
Travis Paden

D. Finance: Authorization to execute a sub lease agreement, with Enterprise Fleet Management, for 11 Dodge Durangos for the Police Department use at approximate costs of $891,000 at $81,000 each ($56,000 for acquisition plus $25,000 for upfitting costs) with monthly lease payments for up to five years from vehicle replacement reserves. [Item H]

Pulled by the public during public comment.

Finance Director Chris Tavarez presented the staff report for the Council's review and consideration and answered questions from the Council.

Motion to approve.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

Passed (UNANIMOUS)
Council Member Kalish Morrow
Council Member Diane Sharp
Diane Sharp, Mark Kairis, Kalish Morrow, Travis Paden, Lou Martinez

E. Finance: Acceptance and authorization for staff to File the City of Hanford's Quarterly Investment Portfolio and Transactions Reports as of 12/31/2022 [Item I]

Pulled by Council Member Martinez for clarification to the public. Finance Director Chris Tavarez presented the staff report for the Council's review and approval.

Motion to approve.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

Passed (UNANIMOUS)
Council Member Lou Martinez
Vice Mayor Mark Kairis
Diane Sharp, Mark Kairis, Kalish Morrow, Travis Paden, Lou Martinez PUBLIC HEARING:

A. Community Development: Annexation No. 160, Part 4: A proposal to annex approximately

93.2 +/- acres into the City of Hanford from the Kings County jurisdiction. Prezone No. 2021- 09: A proposal to prezone Annexation 160 Area 4 a combination of R-L-5 Low-Density Residential and MX-C Corridor Mixed Use, in accordance with the General Plan designation for the area – Low-Density Residential and Corridor Mixed Use. CEQA Determination: The project has been determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Categorical Exemption Class 19 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15319(a). The project is generally located east of 10th Avenue, South of Florinda Street, North of Lacey Boulevard.

Council Member Sharp recused herself from the public hearing. Mayor Paden opened the public hearing at 8:28 p.m. and called for the staff report. Deputy City Manager presented the staff report. City Manager Cifuentez discussed the MOU with Kings County. Staff clarified the difference between zoning and land use. Staff answered questions from the Council.

Mayor Paden opened the public comment period at 8:37 p.m.

Public Comment:

OPPOSED:

None
IN-FAVOR:

Micheal Quinn questioned the land use. Staff responded.

Larry Faria shared his concerns regarding the residents affected by the annexation.

Onan Champi, property owner in the project area, expressed his concerns regarding the zoning and asked the Council to consider a zone change amendment.City Attorney Ty Mizote and staff discussed spot zoning and property rezoning.

Deputy City Manager Waters addressed the concerns expressed during public comment.

Mayor Paden closed the public comment period at 8:53 p.m.

After much discussion, Mayor Paden made the motion to continue the public hearing for further review at the next City Council Meeting.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

Passed (UNANIMOUS)
Mayor Travis Paden
Council Member Kalish Morrow
Mark Kairis, Kalish Morrow, Travis Paden, Lou Martinez
The public hearing was closed at 9:23 p.m.

GENERAL BUSINESS:

A. Parks and Community Services: Council consideration of the Approval of the eighteen-month lease for of the Hanford Soccer Complex (Soc Com) and discussion on Youth Sports Organizations
Parks and Community Services Director Brad Albert discussed the lease for the Council's review and consideration.

He also discussed field maintenance, field permit analysis, cost recovery, and the creation of an advisory committee.

Mr. Albert answered questions from the Council.

Motion to approve the agreement and the formation of the Field Sports Advisory Committee (FASC).

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

Passed (UNANIMOUS)
Vice Mayor Mark Kairis
Mayor Travis Paden
Diane Sharp, Mark Kairis, Kalish Morrow, Travis Paden, Lou Martinez COUNCIL COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS::

At this time, any Council Member may ask a question for clarification, make an announcement, or report briefly on their activities. In addition, subject to Council Policies and Procedures, they may request staff to report back to the Council at a subsequent meeting concerning any matter or take action to direct staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. (GOV. CODE SEC. 54954.2)

A. Council Future Agenda Items
The Council directed staff to bring back a future agenda item regarding right-of-way violations, brought forth by Mayor Paden.

B. Upcoming Events and Important Dates:

February 8: City/County Coordinating Meeting, Hosted by Kings County - Lake Bottom Brewery & Distillery 6:00 p.m.

February 11: Helping Hands Volunteer Program: Earl F Johnson Park 8:00 a.m - Noon: Sign up here
February 20:Holiday,city offices will be closed
February 21: Regular City Council Meeting

ADJOURNMENT:

Mayor Paden adjourned the meeting at 9:54 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,

Natalie Corral
City Clerk

12.C.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 4/4/2023 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Approval of the Minutes of the February 21, 2023 Meeting

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: Approve the minutes from the February 21, 2023 meeting BACKGROUND:

FISCAL IMPACT:

ATTACHMENTS:

1. February 23, 2023

City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes
February 21, 2023 7:00 PM
Council Chambers
400 N. Douty St.

5:00 PM CALL TO ORDER STUDY SESSION AND CLOSED SESSION:

Mayor Paden called the study session and closed session to order at 5:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL BY THE CITY CLERK:

Present: Absent:

Council Member Lou Martinez
Council Member Diane Sharp
Council Member Mark Kairis
Council Member Kalish Morrow
Council Member Travis Paden

PUBLIC COMMENT:

Study Sessions are considered Special Meetings under the Brown Act. Accordingly, comments from the public are limited to items listed on the agenda (GC 54954.3a). A maximum of three minutes is allowed for each speaker. Please begin your comments by stating your name and providing your city of residence.

Public Comment for Study Session Item A:

Michelle Brown, Director of Main Street Hanford, provided a brief overview of Main Street's partnership with the city for the Winter Wonderland Event.

Larry Faria commented on the Winter Winterland event.

Public Comment for Study Session Item B:

Micheal Quinn asked questions regarding zoning. City Attorney Ty Mizote and Deputy City Manger Waters responded to his questions.

Larry Faria questioned the city's representation on the LAFCO Board.

STUDY SESSION:

A. Parks and Community Services: Presentation and Debriefing on the 2022 Winter Wonderland Event
Parks and Community services Director Brad Albert began the presentation with a promotional video of the event and discussed sponsorships, marketing, event data, the financial report, and recommendations for the 2023 Winter Wonderland event. The Council provided their feedback and recommendations.

B. Community Development: Overview of the City Annexation Process and the Role of LAFCO
Deputy City Manager James Waters discussed the annexation process and the role of LAFCO. Deputy Waters and City Attorney Ty Mizote answered questions from the Council.

The Council convened to closed session 6:23 p.m.

CLOSED SESSION FOR DISCUSSION OF THE FOLLOWING:

A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS (GC 54956.8):

Property: 426 W. Lacey Blvd.

APN: 010-253-001-000
Agency Negotiators: Mario Cifuentez and Ty Mizote
Negotiating Party: Nick Warner for MSI Hanford

CALL TO ORDER REGULAR SESSION:

Mayor Paden called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL:

Present: Absent:

Council Member Kalish Morrow
Council Member Lou Martinez
Council Member Travis Paden
Council Member Mark Kairis
Council Member Diane Sharp

INVOCATION:

The invocation was led by Pastor John Escalera.

FLAG SALUTE:

The flag salute was led by Council Member Martinez.

COUNCIL REPORTS/GENERAL REPORTS:

Brief information-only reports from City Council and/or Staff, including committee reports and reports by City Council related to meetings attended at City expenses (AB1234).

The Council discussed the meetings and events they attended.

PUBLIC COMMENT:

This is the time for citizens to comment on subject matters within the jurisdiction of the Hanford City Council. This is also the public’s opportunity to request an item from the Consent Calendar be pulled for discussion purposes or to comment on any item on the agenda. State law does not allow the Council to discuss or take action on issues not on the agenda, except that members of the Council or staff may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons exercising their public testimony rights (Gov. Code sec. 54954.2). A maximum of three minutes is allowed for each speaker. Please begin your comments by stating your name and providing your city of residence.

Miguel Ramirez, SoCal Gas representative, discussed the increase in gas bills and provided an explanation and tips for customers.

William Ochoa spoke in opposition to the traffic circle project.

Onan Champi commented on the continuation of the public hearing for Annexation 160, Part 4 and thanked the Council.

Geovanna Champi introduced herself and commented on the Champi family business. She also commented on the annexation and the zoning change.

Judy Scott expressed her concerns regarding the negative community feedback on the traffic circle project. She shared her experience driving on roundabouts, and stated people will learn how to use them just fine. She also commented on the annexation. She also suggested adding walking paths to the parks.

Nathan Odom gave a speech about his company, Ssussudriad.

Nick Wagner commented on traffic circles and spoke in opposition to the location of the traffic circle project.

Anna Brookshire questioned the funds for the traffic circle project. She also requested to pull consent item E.

Brett Breakman spoke in opposition to the traffic circle project location.

Larry Faria asked the council to listen to the public's input.

Craig Johnson expressed his concerns regarding the homeless in front of his business. He also provided pictures for the Council's review and asked for help with the issue. Mr. Johnson also spoke in opposition to the traffic circles in the downtown.

Bob Ramos commented on the Downtown Pedestrian Safety & Traffic Circulation Project report. He also spoke in opposition to the traffic circle project.

Kirsten Bookout provided pictures for the Council's review and commented on the traffic circle project, and expressed her concerns about the approved location of the traffic circles. She also expressed her concerns about the homeless on her street in front of her business.

Noor Memon provided his background and commented on the Bastille.

Chris Jordan provided his background, and asked several questions regarding the traffic circle project.

Jeff Mora provided his background and experience in the community and commented on the businesses that will be affected by the traffic circle project.

Ernie Wing, owner of several businesses in Hanford, shared his suggestions for downtown improvements.

Kimber Regan commented on the approval of the traffic circle project. She stated downtown merchants do not want traffic circles downtown. She also expressed her concerns regarding the homeless problem downtown.

Mike Portugal commented on the area of the location of the traffic circle project. He also shared his suggestions for improvement downtown.

Leroy Brook suggested other locations for traffic circles.

Micheal Quinn commented on Annexation No. 160, Part 4.

Rusty Brookshire asked the Council to leave the downtown area alone.

Jennifer Sousa commented on the business owners who will be affected by the traffic circles and asked the Council to listen to the business owners' feedback.

CONSENT CALENDAR:

Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these matters unless a request is made and then the item will be removed from the Consent Calendar to be discussed and voted upon by a separate motion.

The Council pulled items B and E.

Motion to approve the consent calendar except for the items pulled for separate discussion.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

Passed (UNANIMOUS)
Council Member Diane Sharp
Council Member Mark Kairis
Diane Sharp, Mark Kairis, Kalish Morrow, Travis Paden, Lou Martinez A. Procedural Waiver: Waive reading in full of resolutions and ordinances and approval and adoption of same by reading title the only.

B. City Clerk: Approval of the appointment of Bert Parolini and Scott Goddard to the Parking and Traffic Commission.

C. Administration: Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 23-04, Amending Chapters 2.32 and 2.28 of the Municipal Code to create Alternate seats on both the Parks & Recreation and Parking & Traffic Commissions.

PULLED CONSENT ITEMS:

A. City Clerk: Approval of the Minutes of the December 20, 2022 Meeting [Item B]

Pulled by Council Member Martinez.

Council Member Martinez expressed his concerns regarding the vote during the study session of the December 20, 2022 meeting. City Clerk Natalie Corral and City Attorney Ty Mizote answered questions from the Council. After a brief discussion, Council Member Morrow made the motion to approve.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

ABSTAIN:

Passed
Council Member Kalish Morrow
Council Member Sharp
Diane Sharp, Mark Kairis, Kalish Morrow, Travis Paden
Lou Martinez
B. Police: Authorization to accept a tobacco enforcement grant in the amount of $70,110.00 and Authorization for Chief of Police, on behalf of the City of Hanford, to execute the MOU with the Department of Justice for the grant.
[Item E]

Pulled by the public during public comment.

Lt. Huddleston addressed the questions asked by the public.

Motion to approve.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

Passed (UNANIMOUS)
Council Member Diane Sharp
Council Member Mark Kairis
Diane Sharp, Mark Kairis, Kalish Morrow, Travis Paden, Lou Martinez PUBLIC HEARING:

A. Community Development: Annexation No. 160, Part 4: A proposal to annex approximately 93.2 +/- acres into the City of Hanford from the Kings County jurisdiction.

Prezone No. 2021-09: A proposal to prezone Annexation 160 Area 4 a combination of R-L-5 Low-Density Residential and MX-C Corridor Mixed Use, in accordance with the General Plan designation for the area – Low-Density Residential and Corridor Mixed Use. CEQA Determination: The project has been determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Categorical Exemption Class 19 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15319(a). The project is generally located east of 10th Avenue, South of Florinda Street, North of Lacey Boulevard.

Before the public hearing was continued, Council Member Sharp recused herself from the discussion and vote. Mayor Paden opened the continued public hearing at 8:16 p.m. and called for the staff report. Senior Planner Gabrielle Myers and Deputy City Manager Waters provided a brief overview of the annexation and approval process. The Council addressed the concerns expressed by Mr. Champi. Staff answered questions from the Council.

Motion to adopt the Notice of Exemption, in accordance with CEQA.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

ABSTAIN:

PASSED
Council Member Kalish Morrow
Vice Mayor Mark Kairis
Lou Martinez, Kalish Morrow, Mark Kairis, Travis Paden
Diane Sharp

Motion to introduce and waive the first reading of Ordinance 23-02, approving Prezone No. 2021-09.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

ABSTAIN:

PASSED
Mayor Travis Paden
Council Member Kalish Morrow
Lou Martinez, Kalish Morrow, Mark Kairis, Travis Paden
Diane Sharp

Motion adopt Resolution No. 23-02-R, initiating proceedings for Annexation 160 (Part 4) and direct staff to file the appropriate forms with the Kings County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo).

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

ABSTAIN:

PASSED
Mayor Travis Paden
Vice Mayor Kairis
Lou Martinez, Kalish Morrow, Mark Kairis, Travis Paden
Diane Sharp

The public hearing was closed at 9:02 p.m.

CONVENE AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY:

Mayor Paden convened as the Successor Agency at 9:03 p.m.

PUBLIC COMMENT-SUCCESSOR AGENCY :

Any person may directly address the Board at this time on any item on the agenda, or on any item that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board. A maximum of three minutes is allowed for each speaker.

Nick Wagner asked questions about the report.

SUCCESSOR AGENCY FOR THE DISCUSSION OF THE FOLLOWING:

A. Finance: Review And Approval Of The Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 23-24) For The Period July 1, 2023 To June 30, 2024 Finance Director Chris Tavarez presented the staff report and answered questions from the Council.

Motion to approve.

RESULT:

MOVER:

Passed (UNANIMOUS)
Vice Mayor Mark Kairis

SECONDER:

AYES:

Council Member Diane Sharp
Diane Sharp, Mark Kairis, Kalish Morrow, Travis Paden, Lou Martinez ADJOURN AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY:

Mayor Paden adjourned as the Successor Agency and reopened the regular meeting at 9:09 p.m.

COUNCIL COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS::

At this time, any Council Member may ask a question for clarification, make an announcement, or report briefly on their activities. In addition, subject to Council Policies and Procedures, they may request staff to report back to the Council at a subsequent meeting concerning any matter or take action to direct staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. (GOV. CODE SEC. 54954.2)
The Council addressed the public comments regarding the traffic circle project. The Council also briefly discussed the upcoming community meeting coordinated by Mayor Paden and Vice Mayor Kairis.

A. Council Future Agenda Items
None.

B. Upcoming Events and Important Dates:

March 7: Regular City Council Meeting
March 11: Hanford Helping Hands Volunteer Program at Encore Park-Sign up here March 21: Regular City Council Meeting
March 22: Special City Council Meeting-Goals Setting, Time: TBD ADJOURNMENT:

Mayor Paden adjourned the meeting at 9:22 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,

Natalie Corral
City Clerk

12.D.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 4/4/2023 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Acceptance of the mandated General Plan Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2022 and authorization for the submittal to the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research

RECOMMENDATION: That City Council receive the staff report, accept the General Plan Annual Progress Report, and direct staff to submit to the California Office of Planning and Research.

BACKGROUND: The Annual General Plan Report is intended to comply with the requirements of Government Code Section 65400, which requires that all cities annually submit to California Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and Housing and Community Development (HCD) a report on the status of the General Plan and progress in implementing the Housing Element. This report contains the General Plan Annual Progress Report for submission to OPR and captures the activities conducted by the City towards implementation of the General Plan. The General Plan APR allows OPR to identify statewide trends in land use decision-making and how local planning and development activities relate to statewide planning goals and policies. APRs may also inform future modifications to OPR’s General Plan Guidelines. In addition, OPR can track progress on a local jurisdiction's comprehensive General Plan update using the information provided in the APR. The APR satisfies OPR’s Guidelines by providing the following information:
• Measures associated with the implementation of the general plan with specific reference to individual elements
• Housing Element APR reporting
• The date of the last update to the General Plan
• Planning activities receiving discretionary approval
• Capital Improvement Projects conducted over the past year

Please see the full report - attached as Attachment 1.

A copy of the Housing APR is attached as Exhibit A.

ATTACHMENTS:

None

General Plan Annual Progress Report – 2022

Prepared by:

City of Hanford
Community Development Department
Planning Division

April 2023

For:

State of California
Governor’s Office of Planning and Research
State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit

INTRODUCTION

The Annual General Plan Report is intended to comply with the requirements of Government Code Section 65400, which requires that all cities annually submit to California Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and Housing and Community Development (HCD) a report on the status of the General Plan and progress in implementing the Housing Element. This report represents the Community Development activity for the planning year 2022.

The General Plan APR allows OPR to identify statewide trends in land use decision -making and how local planning and development activities relate to statewide planning goals and policies.

APRs may also inform future modifications to OPR’s General Plan Guidelin es. In addition, OPR can track progress on a local jurisdiction's comprehensive General Plan update using the information provided in the APR. Similarly, the Housing Element APR allows HCD to track the progress of the implementation of a jurisdiction’s Hou sing Element and requires its submission as a threshold requirement for several State housing funding programs.

DATE OF PRESENTATION/ACCEPTANCE

The General Plan APR will be presented to the Hanford City Council at their regularly scheduled meeting on April 4, 2023. A presentation will be given to the City Council as a General Business item.

COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 2035

Pursuant to State general plan law there are seven State-mandated elements in the City’s general plan. They are:

• Land use
• Circulation
• Housing
• Open Space
• Conservation
• Noise
• Safety

As of 2003, Cities within the San Joaquin Valley are also required to have an air quality element.

Signed into law in 2016, under SB 1000, cities and counties that have identified disadvantag ed communities must also address environmental justice in their general plans, including air quality.

Additionally Required:

• Air Quality
• Environmental Justice

The Air Quality element was adopted in 2010. The requirement to address environmental justice within the Air Quality element was not adopted until 2016; therefore, the Air Quality element does not address environmental justice, expressly. The City does not have a separate Environmental

Justice element; however, environmental justice is addressed through policy in the General Plan Health, Safety, and Noise element.

State general plan law also states that cities may adopt other elements as they see fit for t heir communities. Hanford’s General Plan also contains an economic development element and a public facilities and services element. All elements of the General Plan have equal weight and status. One element is not superior to any other. The goals and poli cies within each element are required to be consistent with each other and with the goals and policies in the other elements of the General Plan.

The general plan’s maps, diagrams, and development policies form the basis for the zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance, design guidelines, and the capital improvement program – tools which implement the general plan. Under California law, no specific plan, zoning, subdivision map, or public works project may be approved unless the City finds that it is consistent with the adopted general plan.

The land use element designates the type, intensity, and general distribution of uses of the land for housing, business, industry, open space, education, public buildings and grounds, waste disposal facilities, and other categories of public and private uses.

The circulation element is correlated with the land use element and identifies the general location and extent of existing and proposed major thoroughfares, transportation routes, and terminals for all modes of transportation.

The housing element is a comprehensive ass essment of current and projected housing needs for all segments of the community and all economic groups. In addition, it embodies policies for providing adequate housing and includes action programs for that purpose. By statute, the housing element must b e updated and certified on a schedule set by the State Housing and Community Development Department. The housing element is prepared as a separate document in conjunction with the County of Kings, and the cities of Lemoore, Corcoran, and Avenal.

The conservation element addresses the conservation, development, and use of natural resources, including water and soils. This chapter also contains goals and policies for parks and recreation.

The open space element describes measures for preserving open-space for natural resources, the managed production of resources, outdoor recreation, and agricultural land. The open space element is also found mostly in Chapter 5 of both the Background Report and the Policy Document.

The noise element identifies and appraises noise problems within the community and forms the basis for land use distribution.

The safety element establishes policies and programs to protect the community from risks associated with seismic, geologic, flood, extreme heat, and fire hazards.

The economic development element identifies trends in the local economy and sets general direction for improving the community’s economic sustainability and prosperity.

The public facilities and services element identify publicly owned facilities and service infrastructure. It sets policies to facilitate continued service to the community as it grows and develops. It sets a general direction for citywide school site planning, law enforcement and fire protection services, sewer and water infrastructure, and other local public facilities and buildings.

The Air Quality Element provides a comprehensive set of goals, objectives, policies, and implementation programs intended to meet the requirements of Assembly Bill 170 for Air Quality Elements and state laws pertaining to greenhouse gases.

The General Plan was adopted on April 24, 2017 through Resolution 17-21-R.

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT INFORMATION

Most Recent Adopted Amendment

During 2022, one General Plan Amendment was completed. The most recent Gener al Plan Amendment, General Plan Amendment No. 2021-01 c) was executed on November 15, 2022 by Resolution 22-42-R.

General Plan Amendment No. 2021-01 c) was a request to change the land use designation from Medium-Density Residential to Corridor Mixed Use on 18 parcels, totaling 28 acres.

The project pertained to land located north of East Lacey Boulevard, between North 10th Avenue and 9 ¼ Avenue, in a county island and within the City Sphere of Influence (APN 014 -201-006, - 009, 014-202-005, -006, 014-203-002, -003, -004, -005, -006, 014-204-001, -002, 014-221-017, -018, -019, -020, -021, -022, and 014-221-026).

Figure 1: Project Location (Aerial)

Figure 2: Former General Plan Designation – Medium-Density Residential (outlined in red)

Figure 3: Amended General Plan Designation – Corridor Mixed Use (outlined in red)

Figure 4: Former Zoning Designation: The property was formerly located in the Kings County jurisdiction and zoned CS Service Commercial (County Zoning). The entire island has been annexed and prezoned as a combination of R-L-5 Low-Density Residential and MX-C Corridor Mixed Use.

Amended Zone Designation – MX-N Neighborhood Mixed (outlined in red)

In Progress

During 2022, there were three General Plan Amendments in progress.

General Plan Amendment No. 2021-01 Part A:

Part A – Telstar

General Plan Amendment No. 2021 -01 A: A request to change the General Plan Designation on two .52-acre parcels, totaling 1.04 acres, from Downtown Mixed Use to Service Commercial.

Rezone No. 2021-09: A request to change the zoning on two parcels, totalin g 1.04 acres, from MX-D Downtown Mixed Use to C-S Service Commercial.

Site Plan Review No. 2020 -27: A request to construct a 10,000 sq. ft. office for the purchase, sale, and light assembly of electrical gear for electrical and programing services and construction.

Conditional Use Permit No.2021 -04: A request to allow an off -site parking lot for Telstar employees’ use on a parcel proposed to be designated as C-S Service Commercial.

Location: The project is located east of Irwin Street, between Fourth and Fifth Streets (APN 012- 095-001 and 012-095-011).

Figure 5: Project Location (Aerial)

Figure 6: Existing General Plan Designation - Downtown Mixed Use (outlined in black)

Figure 7: Proposed General Plan Designation – Service Commercial (outlined in black)

Figure 8: Existing Zone Designation – MX-D Downtown Mixed Use (outlined in black)

Figure 9: Proposed Zone Designation – C-S Service Commercial (outlined in black)

General Plan Amendment No. 2021-02: A request to change the General Plan Designation on a 1.45-acre parcel from Neighborhood Mixed Use to Regional Commercial.

Rezone No. 2021 -10: A request to change the zoning on a 1.45 -acre parcel from MX -N Neighborhood Mixed Use to C-R Regional Commercial.

Site Plan Review No. 2020 -27: A request to construct a four -story, 86-room hotel on a parcel proposed to be zoned C-R Regional Commercial.

Conditional Use Permit No.2021-05: A request to allow a hotel use on a property proposed to be zoned C-R Regional Commercial. The use of a hotel is a conditionally permitted use in the C- R Regional Commercial zone district.

Variance No. 2021 -02: A request to deviate from Section 17.18.080 of the Hanford Municipal Code, in order to exceed the 35-foot height maximum of the C-R Regional Zone District, in order to permit a 50 -foot-high, four -story hotel on a parcel proposed to be zoned C -R Regional Commercial; and a request to deviate from Section 17.54.040 of the Hanford Municipal Code, in order to reduce the parking requirement for an 86-room hotel with three full-time employees (per shift) from 89 spaces to 86.

Location: The project is located on South 1 2th Avenue, south of Hayden Avenue, north of Hanford-Armona Road (APN 011-060-015).

Figure 10: Project Location (Aerial)

Figure 11: Existing General Plan Designation – Neighborhood Mixed Use (outlined in red)

Figure 12: Proposed General Plan Designation – Regional Commercial (outlined in red)

Figure 13: Existing Zone Designation – MX-N Neighborhood Mixed Use (outlined in red)

Figure 14: Proposed Zone Designation – C-R Regional Commercial (outlined in red)

General Plan Amendment No. 2022-01: a request to change the general plan designation from Highway Commercial to Service Commercial and High -Density Residential on approximately

39.16 acres.

Rezone No. 2022 -01: a request to change the zoning on 39.16 acres from C -H Hig hway Commercial to C -S Service Commercial and R -H High-Density Residential with a Planned Unit Development overlay.

Planned Unit Development No. 2022-01: a request to allow blended zoning for a master planned medical and mixed-use development, including the future construction of 15 buildings consisting of medical outpatient clinic services, a hotel and conference center, specialized education, retail, medical office, skilled nursing and assisted living, and multi -family residential uses, as well as a bio infiltration basin, associated open space, circulation and parking, and infrastructure improvements. The Planned Unit Development Master Plan has been included via email.

Location:

The project is located between 11th and 12th Avenues along Glendale Drive, north of Highway 198 (APN 011-060-007, 011-060-008, 012-290-042, and 012-290-054).

Figure 15: Project Location

Figure 16: Project Location

Progress towards implementing the 2035 Land Use Element

Growth Management

During 2022, projects identified in the following sections were in progress to align with the City’s growth management goals and policies, specifically:

Growth Management Goals

Goal L1: A well planned community that grows in an organized fashion.

Goal L2: Development preference of vacant and underutilized properties.

Goal L3: Limitation of urban sprawl-style development patterns in new growth areas.

Policy L16 County Islands: Initiate annexation of County islands when it is found that urban services are needed and can be provided or made available in the near future.

• Annexation No. 160, Parts 1- 3 and 5 – 8, a proposal to annex seven (7) separate county islands with a combined total of 279 acres into the City of Hanford, from the Kings County jurisdiction. Prezone No. 2021 -01 thru 2021 -03 and 2021 -05 thru 2021 -08, a request to prezone the various county islands, in accordance with their General Plan designation.

The projects are located in existing county islands, fully surrounded by the City of Hanford.

The seven identified County islands were annexed into the City of Hanford on September 15, 2022.

• Annexation No. 160, Part 4, a proposal to annex one (1) county island, totaling 93 acres into the City of Hanford, from a county island , in accordance with th e General Plan designation, Corridor Mixed Use. The annexation is located in an existing county island, fully surrounded by the City of Hanford.

The annexation was in progress during 2022, but not finalized.

Residential Projects

During 2022, the follo wing residential discretionary projects were approved in accordance with the growth management goals and policies listed above and with respective goals identified for the various land use types of the Land Use Element, specifically:

Residential Land Use Designation Goals

Goal L4: Adequate land available to meet housing needs for all citizens through the year 2035.

Goal L5: Stable, high quality neighborhoods with housing integrated with schools, parks, and availability of everyday commercial goods and services.

Goal L6: A wide range of housing choices that insure opportunities for a variety of age groups, lifestyles, and income levels.

Goal L7: Residential densities that encourage both compact and infill development.

Residential Land Use Designations Goals

Goal L8: A range of residential building types suitable for a variety of lifestyles, ages, affordability levels, and design options.

Goal L9: Distinctive neighborhoods that preserve and enhance the quality of life for residents.

During 2022, one tentative tract was approved:

1. Vesting Tentative Tract 934 was a request by Precision Civil Engineering, Inc., on behalf of Lennar Homes, to subdivide 36.48 acres into 161 and a 66,216 sq. ft. storm drainage basin single-family residential lots in the R-L-5 Low-Density Residential zone district. The project pertains to land located at the southeast corner of 13th Avenue and Grangeville Boulevard (APN 009 -050-001 through -005). The project was approved by Planning Commission on April 12, 2022.

During 2022:

• 178 residential units were issued building permits
o 106 single-family residences
o 72 multi-family units
• 340 residential units were completed
o 292 single-family residential units
o 48 multi-family units

A detailed report appears in Exhibit A.

Residential Discretionary Projects – 2022

Residential

TIME EXTENSION 2022-02 was a request to extend the life of Tentative Tract 924 and Planned Unit Development No. 2017 -01 for one year. Tentative Tract 924 was a request to subdivide a

4.19-acre parcel into 26 residential lots in the R -L-12 Low Density Residential Zone District with a Planned Unit Development overlay, located at the southern intersection of Greenfield Avenue and Fitzgerald Lane (APN 010-320-115). Planned Unit Development No. 2017-01 was a request to deviate from the standards of the R -L-12 Low-Density Residential zone district to allow a 26 - lot gated community with common open -space areas, reduced lot sizes, reduced setbacks, and a reduced street width for a private street. The project pertains to property located at the southern intersection of Gr eenfield Avenue and Fitzgerald Lane (APN 010 -320-115). The project was approved by the Planning Commission on March 22, 2022.

Time Extension No. 2022 -03 was a request by Enclave Developers, LLC to extend the life of Tentative Tract 915 and Planned Unit Development No. 2018-01 Amendment #1 for one year, in order to extend the expiration of the tentative map to record a final map. Tentative Tract 915 was a request to subdivide a 14.29 -acre parcel into 66 residential lots in the R -L-5 Low Density Residential Zone District with a Planned Unit Development overlay, located east of 12 ½ Avenue, west of Centennial Drive (APN 011 -020-046). Planned Unit Development No. 2018 -01 was a request to deviate from the standards of the Hanford Municipal Code Section 17.10 to permit reduced lot sizes, a reduced street width for a private street, reduced setbacks, reduced street frontage, and reduced lot widths for the development proposed under Vesting Tentative Tract 915.

The item was approved by the Planning Commission on April 12, 2022.

Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-02 was a request to divide a legally-existing, nonconforming single-family residence in the PF Public Facility zone district into a duplex for use by Kings

Rehabilitation Center, in accordance with Section 17 .90.110 Change of Nonconforming Uses of the Hanford Municipal Code. The project pertains to property located at 984 S. Green Street on the Kings Rehabilitation Center Property, located at 494 E. Hanford-Armona Road (APN 012-232- 077). The Planning Commission approved the item on May 24, 2022.

Variance No. 2022 -01 was a request to deviate from the standards of the Hanford Municipal Code Section 17.14.130, in order to permit required parking spaces within the rear -yard setback for a 100 -unit multi-family development. The project was located north of Millennium Way and west of Centennial Drive (APN 011 -020-043 and 011-020-044). The item was approved by the Planning Commission on June 28, 2022.

Variance No. 2022 -04, 2022-06 and 2022-07 were requests by San Jo aquin Valley Homes to deviate from the standards of the Hanford Municipal Code Section 17.10.070 E, in order to reduce the street-side setback for irregular corner lots in the R-L-5 Low-Density Residential zone district from 10 feet to five feet and one inch. The projects were located at 1305 S. Angus Court, 1304 S.

Angus Court, and 1302 S. Autumn Breeze Court. All properties were located on APN 011 -110- 029, within Tract 865, which had not been assigned its own assessor’s parcel number at the time of Planning Commission Review. The projects were approved by the Planning Commission on July 12, 2022.

Variance No. 2022-03 was a request by San Joaquin Valley Homes to deviate from the standards of the Hanford Municipal Code Section 17.10.070(C), in order to reduce the rear setback from 15 feet to 5 feet for an irregular corner lot in the R -L-5 Low Density Residential zone district. The project was located at 1911 S. Mill Rd. (APN 011-580-053). The project was approved on August 9, 2022.

Variance No. 2022-08 was a request by San Joaquin Valley Homes to deviate from the standards of the Hanford Municipal Code Section 17.10.070(C), in order to reduce the rear setback from 15 feet to 5 feet for an irregular corner lot in the R -L-5 Low Density Residential zone distr ict. The project was located at 1396 W. Kenny Thompson Ct. (APN 011 -580-043).The project was approved by the Planning Commission on August 9, 2022.

Commercial/Industrial Discretionary Projects – 2022

During 202 2, the following commercial/industrial discretionary projects were approved in accordance with the goals and policies of the Economic Development and Land Use Element, specifically:

Commercial

Conditional Use Permit No. 2020 -05 was a request by Master S torage 365 to allow a self - storage facility in the R-L-5 Low Density Residential zone district. The project pertains to property located south of the intersection of Highway 43 and 10th Avenue (APN 014-080-078). The project was approved by the Planning Commission on February 8, 2022.

Time Extension No. 2022-01 was a request by Lighthouse Fellowship Church to extend the life of Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-06 and Site Plan Review No. 2019 -32 for one year, in order to extend the expiration of the project and obtain building permits. The project pertains to property located north of Glendale Avenue, west of Aquifer Drive (APN 011 -010-044). The project was approved by the Planning Commission on February 8 ,2022.

Conditional Use Permit No. 2021 -01 was a request to convert a former offic e into a drive-thru dry cleaning business located in the MX -D Downtown Mixed Use zone district. The use of a dry cleaning business with a drive -thru pick-up window required a conditional use permit in the MX - D Downtown Mixed Use zone district. The other ex isting structure was proposed to be reconstructed into a commercial business. The proposed project pertains to property located at 255 N. 11th Avenue (APN 012-061-001 and 012-061-002). The item was approved by the Planning Commission on April 12, 2022.

Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-01 was a request to convert a former restaurant into a dental office in the C-R Regional Commercial zone district. With the approval of Zone Text Amendment No. 2021 -01 by City Council on November 2, 2021, the use of an office ; medical, dental, or optometry that is between 2,000 and 6,000 square feet required a conditional use permit in the C-R Regional Commercial zone district. The project’s building square footage was approximately 3,500 square feet. The project pertains to property located at 150 N. 12 th Ave., Suite 109 (APN 011-020-020). The Planning Commission approved the item on April 26, 2022.

Time Extension No. 2022 -04 was a request to extend the life of Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-13 and Site Plan Review No. 2018 -38 for one year. Conditional Use Permit No. 2018 -13 was a request to allow a three -story, 65,900 sq. ft., 105 -room hotel on a vacant parcel, located north of Hayden Avenue, east of 12th Avenue (APN 011-060- 058 and 011-060-012). The use of a hotel require s approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission in the C -R Regional Commercial zone district. The project pertains to property located north of Hayden Avenue, east of 12th Avenue (APN 011-060-058 and 011-060-012). The project was approved by the Planning Commission on November 8, 2022.

Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-03 was a request to establish an auto detailing business within a former pool and spa service and repair building located in the MX-D Downtown Mixed-Use zone district. The project included the use of the building for the sale of auto detailing products and accessories. The business was classified as a “motor vehicle repair or service, minor” use. The use of the site for the minor service of motor vehicles required a conditional use permit in the MX- D Downtown Mixed-Use zone district. The proposed project was located at 208 E. Fourth Street (APN 012-093-010). The Planning Commission approved the item on June 28, 2022.

Conditional Use Permit No. 2018 -07 was a request to develop a self -storage and recreational vehicle (RV) storage facility in the MX-C Corridor Mixed Use zone district over three phases. The project pertained to property located east of 10 th Avenue, along east Fifth Street, north of State Route 198 (APN 016 -032-010 and 016 -032-012). The project was approved by the Planning Commission on August 23, 2022.

Tentative Parcel Map No. 2022 -02 was a request to divide two parcels of approximately 3.33 acres in total size into three parcels (Parcel A: 1.24 acres; Parcel B: 1.55 acres; Parcel C: 0.54 acres) in the MX -N Neighborhood Mixed Use zone district. Planned Unit Development No. 2022-03 was a request to amend Planned Unit Development No. 2019 -02 to allow a parcel with no street frontage within an existing shopping center in the MX-N Neighborhood Mixed Use zone district. The project pertained to property located near the northwest corner of 10th Avenue and Fargo Avenue (APN 007 -110-053 and -054). The proj ects were approved by the Planning Commission on October 25, 2022.

Tentative Parcel Map No. 2022-01 was a request to divide a 47,473-square-foot parcel into two parcels (Parcel A: 12,469 sq. ft.; Parcel B: 35,004 sq. ft.) in the MX -C Corridor Mixed Use z one

district. The project pertained to property located at 520 W. Lacey Blvd. (APN 010-510-003). The project was approved by the Planning Commission on November 8, 2022.

Conditional Use Permit No. 2022 -09 was a request to convert a former dry cleaners in to an esports gaming lounge in an existing shopping center in the C-N Neighborhood Commercial zone district. The project pertained to property located at 2443 N. 10 th Ave. (APN 014-670-079). The project was approved by the Planning Commission on December 13, 2022.

Industrial

Conditional Use Permit No. 2021 -09 was a request to install a 1 MW ground -mounted tracker photovoltaic (PV) solar facility as an accessory use to the existing Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc. chemical manufacturing facility in the I -H Heavy Industrial zone district. The project pertains to property located at 10724 Energy Street (APN 018 -242-077 and 018-242-078). The project was approved by the Planning Commission on February 22, 2022.

Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-07 was a request by Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc. to amend their original conditional use permit, in order to add a new 260,000 gallon above-ground molten sulfur tank to their site. The tank will facilitate additional storage onsite. The proposal did not alter the existing use of the site. The project pertained to property located at 10724 Energy Street (APN 018-242-078). The project was approved by the Planning Commission on September 27, 2022.

Conditional Use Permit No. 2022 -05 was a request, by GBH Calcot , LLC, to allow a cannabis cultivation facility in the I -H Heavy Industrial zone district. The permit applied to the processing, curing, grading, and storing of cannabis inside three (3) 35,000 square foot buildings on an existing site. The project pertain ed to property located at 10210 Idaho Avenue (APN 018 -242- 024). The project was approved by the Planning Commission on September 27, 2022.

Variance No. 2022-02 was a request by Marquez Brothers Inc. to deviate from the standards of the Hanford Municipal Code Section 17.34.060, in order to allow a reduced setback of 6 feet and 6 inches where a 15-foot setback is required for a portion of a proposed yogurt processing area in the I-H Heavy Industrial zone district. The variance applied to Site Plan Review No. 2022-24, which proposed a Master Plan development to renovate and expand an existing dairy processing facility over four phases. The project pertained to property located at the northeast corner of South 11th Avenue and West 4th Street, addressed as 179 S outh 11th Avenue (APNs 012 -081-003, 012-070-030, 012-085-008, 012-070-029, 012-070-009, and 012-070-022) in the City of Hanford.

The project was approved by the Planning Commission on December 13, 2022.

Economic Development and Employment Goals

Goal E1: A diverse and robust local economy capable of providing employment for all residents desiring to work in the city.

Goal E2 A diversity of commercial and industrial enterprises which provide goods, services, and employment opportunities consisten t with Hanford’s small -town, agricultural image.

Goal E3: A business-friendly environment for both existing and new business enterprises.

PUBLIC FACILITES AND SERVICES

There were no amendments to the Public Facilities and Services Element during 2022.

The following public facilities and services projects were conducted by the City of Hanford during 2022:

Entitlements:

Public:

Roadway Abandonment No. 2021-01 was a request by CM Construction Services to abandon approximately 7,994 square feet of right-of-way, an alley ("China Alley”, portion) to allow a parking lot and landscaping for the future Kings Area Regional Transit (KART) facility. The project pertains to property located south of East Eighth Street between North Harris and North Brown Streets.

The project was approved by the City Council on May 3, 2022.

Roadway Abandonment No. 2022-01 was a request by the City of Hanford to abandon approximately 3,900 square feet of right-of-way, an alley ("Civic Center”, portion) to allow a secured parking lot and storage for police vehicles. The project pertains to property located south of Center Street between North Irwin and North Douty Streets. The project was approved by the City Council on May 3, 2022.

Downtown Projects:

Downtown Reinvestment Zone: The funding from this project included funding of infrastructure improvements, as well as Downtown improvement loans and grants.

Water Projects:

• Water main replacement: This project involved replacing existing small mains and older mains that do not meet City Standards for fire protection or water delivery.

• Automated Meter Replacement: This project utilized funds for replacement of automated meter reading devices citywide that are no longer reading accurately or that were unable to be repaired.

• New Water Supply Well: This project funded the installation of a new deep-water well and associated pumping equipment, in order to provide additional Cit y water supply and service reliability. As development occurs, the need to provide additional water capacity and service reliability is necessary.

• Unscheduled Main Extensions and Replacements: This project funded unanticipated projects which occurred when a developer was connecting to the City’s water system and required the main to be extended beyond the project boundaries. Funds from this project also were utilized for replacement of undersized or deteriorated water mains.

Storm Drainage Projects:

• Bonneyview Basin: This project consisted of a modification of the ditch and piping structure for the Bonneyview Basin, in order to move water from the Sand Slough Basin to the Bonneyview Basin.

• Storm Drainage System Oversizing Requirements: This project utilized funds to reimburse developers that were required to upsize their storm drainage improvements to provide additional capacity, in compliance with the Strom Drainage Master Plan.

• Curb and Gutter Installation: This project involved the installation of new or replacement concrete curb and gutter to facilitate proper street drainage. Projects included replacement of existing dilapidated curbs and gutter and installation of new curb an d gutter in existing developed areas currently void of these improvements. These improvements were necessary to ensure proper drainage and alleviate localized flooding.

• Tree Trim/Removal Program: This project removed trees from ponding basins, in order to allow access for necessary maintenance within the basins, in accordance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System maintenance and compliance testing.

• Mussel Slough/Laura Ln. Pump Installation: The project provided for dewatering of the basin and the installation of new diversion gates to provide routine maintenance and assist in mosquito abatement activities, and increase storage capacity.

• Increase Flow Capacity/People’s Ditch: This project provided funds for shared maintenance costs and improvements to increase the capacity in both the east and west branches of Peoples Ditch within City limits.

Waste Water:

• Sewer Main Oversizing Requirements: This project utilized funds to reimburse developers that were required to upsize their sewer improvements in order to provide additional capacity, in compliance with the City’s Sanitary Sewer Master Plan.

• Unscheduled Main Extensions/Replacements: This project utilized funds in order to reimburse developers for costs attributed to extending sewer mains beyond their project frontage, in order to provide service to their project as well as funds for emergency repairs on deteriorated or undersized mains within the sewer system.

• Civic Auditorium Sewer Main Replacement: The project involves replacem ent of the damaged clay sewer main leading from the building to Douty Street along Furlong Drive.

• Sewer System Video Inspections: This project involved video camera inspections of the City’s sanitary sewer mains and recording of the resulting data. The m ains were videotaped and catalogued as to their condition.

• Lift Station Panel Replacement at Lift Stations #56 and #23: This project replaced the obsolete electrical control panels for two existing storm sewer lift stations located along Greenfield Avenue, south of Elm Street and Highway 198 at People’s Ditch. The stations were constructed prior to 1994 and the equipment has not been updated since construction. The electrical panels served their useful life and parts were no longer available for repairs.

• Protective Grating at Lift Stations: Protective grating is a safety feature that was installed to prevent accidental falls into the wet well. By installing the protective grating, staff who inspect and make the repairs to the lift stations will be more safe and protected.

• Spare Pumps: This project provided for the purchase of spare pumps that can be quickly switched out to assist staff in getting the lift station back in operation as quickly as possible when a pump fails and needs to be replaced or rebuilt.

Public Facilities:

• Police Department Parking Lot Expansion: This project included the reconfiguring and redesign of the existing parking spaces located east of the Police Station, in order to provide for additional and more efficient parking for the Police Station. Th e project also included fencing and gates to secure the area.

• Parking Lot/Alley Seal Coat Treatment: This project included the sealing of City parking lots and alleys to extend the useful life of the pavement surface.

• PAL Parking Lot: This project involved the repaving and upgrading of the Police Activities League parking lot and project site.

• Fire Station No. 2 Flooring Replacement: This project involved the removal and replacement of the carpet and linoleum tile at Fire Station 2 with Vinyl Composition Tile

• Fire Station No. 1 Flooring Replacement: This project involved the removal and replacement of the carpet and linoleum tile at Fire Station 2 with Vinyl Composition Tile

• Civic Auditorium Roof Replacement Project: This project involved the replacement of the existing roof, that was last replaced in 1993.

• Public Works Carpet Replacement Project: This project replaced all carpeted areas within the Public Works building.

• Refuse Office – Breakroom: This project replaced a single refuse office with a breakroom and two supervisor offices.

Services:

• Dangerous Building Abatement: This is an on-going project which facilities the demolition and removal of dilapidated buildings on private properties, when determined to be unsafe or public nuisances under City or State building or fire codes.

TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION

There were no amendments to the Circulation Element during 2022.

The following transportation projects were conducted by the City of Hanford during 2022:

• 12th Avenue Widening, Springcrest St. to 500 feet south (west side): the project i nvolved the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, and roadway widening along 12 th Avenue (west side), from Springcrest Street to a point approximately 500 feet south of Springcrest Street.

• Traffic Signal at 12th Avenue and Hume Avenue: This project consisted of the installation of a traffic signal system at the intersection of 12 th Avenue and Hume Avenue, due to increased residential development in the area, increasing and placing additional demands on the transportation system.

• Campus Drive Resurfacing, Lacey Boulevard to Greenfield Avenue: The project involved the resurfacing of street pavement within Campus Drive, from Lacey Boulevard to Greenfield Avenue. Improvements included recycling of existing pavement, adjusting manhole and gate valve covers, installation of accessibility ramps, asphalt concrete paving and restriping of the roadway.

• East Lacey Boulevard Widening/Reconstruction, 10 th Avenue to Sierra Drive: this project involved the widening and reconstruction of East Lacey Boulevard, between 10 th Avenue and Sierra Drive, to facilitate two lanes in each direction of travel plus turn lanes.

Improvements include the reconstruction of existing pavement section, installation of a new drainage collection/dis posal system, installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive approaches and ADA ramps, installation of a traffic signal system at East lacey Boulevard/Ninth Avenue and installation of additional street lighting.

• Downtown Pedestrian Safety: This project utilized funds to improve conditions for pedestrians in the downtown area.

• Pavement Resurfacing Treatment: This is an ongoing project that adds pavement resurfacing treatment, a surface protection and pavement preservation treatment to city streets. The project provides surface treatment for approximately seven miles of roadways.

• Sidewalk and Miscellaneous Concrete Repairs: This is an ongoing project that repairs sidewalks, drive approaches and other concrete improvements where city crews are completing street reconstruction projects or in areas where the improvements are damaged by tree roots.

• New Sidewalk and ADA Improvements: This is an ongoing project that installs sidewalks and other concrete improvements in areas currently void of such improvements.

Improvement areas are selected along arterial/collector streets with high pe destrian volume and where existing rights -of-ways exist to facilitate sidewalk installation. This project also installs accessibility ramps in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards.

• Unscheduled Arterial Upgrades and Traffi c Signal Installation: This project utilized funds to reimburse developers who are required to construct qualifying arterial street improvements in excess of their project’s transportation mitigation impact fee share.

• Reclamite Seal Treatment: This is a p roject that adds reclamite to preserve city streets.

The treatment keeps the pavement surface flexible and reduces asphalt oil content loss.

The project provided surface treatment for approximately five miles of arterial/collector streets.

• Survey Monumen tation/Benchmark Update: This project utilized funds to re -establish survey monumentation on street re -surfacing projects to update the City’s survey benchmark datum and mapping. The Benchmark system is typically updated every ten years. The last update was in 2004.

• Street Division Maintenance: Funds from this project paid for labor, maintenance materials, equipment rental, and other contracted services for street reconstruction, resurfacing, and repair projects.

• Grangeville Boulevard at BNSF Grade Separation Feasibility Study: This project analyzed the feasibility of a grade separation project at Grangeville Boulevard at the BNSF railroad intersection.

OPEN SPACE, CONSERVATION, AND RECREATION

There were no amendments to the Open Space, Conservation, Safety and Noise Elements during 2022

The following open space and recreation projects were conducted by the City of Hanford during 2022:

Park Space:

• Longfield Center Renovations: This project updated the Longfield Center, which has not had a significant improvement or renovation since its construction in 1977, to include new flooring, lighting, paint, and furniture.

• Lacey Park Basketball Courts: This project included the removal of three asphalt basketball courts with the replacement of four cement basketball courts and additional lighting to replace the weathered, cracking, and uneven/unsafe courts.

• Hidden Valley Park /Fitness Court: The project wa s partially funded by a grant award for the installation of a Fitness Court at Hidden Valley Park.

• Soccer Complex Improvements: This project included the installation of sports lighting within the City’s property (basin fields) located at the Soc -Com fac ility. The lighting improvement is intended to expand the use of the facility for both youth and adult sports.

• Park Development Oversizing Requirements: This project reimbursed developers for costs associated with park construction in excess of their park impact fee assessment.

HOUSING ELEMENT

The City of Hanford City Council adopted the Housing Element Update 2016-2024 on January 5, 2016. The Housing Element was approved by Department of Housing and Community Development on March 31, 2016.

In accordance with Section 65400, 65583, and 65584 of the California Government Code, the City is required to prepare an annual report on the status and progress in implementing the City’s Housing Element using forms and definitions adopted by the Department of Hous ing and Community Development. The completed forms for the 202 2 calendar year are attached as Exhibit A to this report.

GENERAL PLAN COMPLIANCE WITH OPR’S GUIDELINES

As part of the General Plan APR, the City is required to evaluate the degree to which the General Plan complies with OPR’s General Plan Guidelines, including new environmental justice considerations, collaborative planning with military lands and facilities, and consultation with Native American Tribes.

While a general plan will contain th e community vision for future growth, California law also requires each plan to address the mandated elements listed in Government Code section 65302.

The mandatory elements for all jurisdictions are land use, circulation, housing, conservation, open space, noise, and safety. Cities and counties in the San Joaquin Air Pollution Control District must also address air quality in their general plans. Cities and counties that have identified disadvantaged communities must also address environmental justice in t heir general plans, including air quality.

As described in an earlier section, the Hanford General Plan contains the following required elements, plus an economic development element:

• Land Use
• Circulation
• Conservation
• Open Space
• Noise
• Safety
• Public Facilities and Services

• Economic Development

A document containing Hanford’s Housing Element was prepared and adopted separately from the rest of the General Plan due to its State mandated deadlines for adoption. Hanford has historically joined Kings County, Corcoran, Lemoore, and Avenal in prepa ring a combined Housing Element. An updated Housing Element was adopted in 2016 for the time period between January 2016 and January 2024.

A document containing Hanford’s Air Quality Element was prepared and adopted in 2010. No updates to this document were necessary when the rest of the General Plan was updated in 2017.

Land Use Element:

Required Contents:

Government Code section 65302(a) describes the required content of a land use element.

Specifically, the land use element must designate the propo sed general distribution, general location, and extent of land uses for:

Addressed:

✓ Housing, business, and industry
✓ Open space, including agricultural land, watersheds, natural resources, and recreation ✓ Recreation facilities and opportunities
✓ Educational facilities
✓ Public buildings and grounds
✓ Future solid and liquid waste facilities
✓ Other categories of public and private uses of land, such as marine protected areas

Not Applicable:

- Greenways
- Timberland Preserve Zone lands
- Areas subject to flooding, identified by either flood plain mapping prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or the Depa rtment of Water Resources or mapped flood areas adopted by the local community on Flood Insurance Rate Maps o Hanford is located within a 500 -year Flood Zone as defined by the Federal Emergency Management Agencies Flood Insurance Maps. Five -Hundred Year Flood describes the flood that has a 0.2 percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any year. Areas subject to the 500-year flood have a moderate to low risk of flooding. As expected, no floods have occurred in the area during recent years and therefore, t here has not been a need to impede or place building restrictions upon development.

Circulation Element:

The circulation element must, consistent with Government Code Section 65302 (b), include the location and extent of existing and proposed:

Included:
✓ Major thoroughfares
✓ Transportation routes
✓ Terminals
✓ Public utilities and facilities

Not applicable:

• Military airports and ports (not within Planning Area)

Housing Element:

State law requires the housing element to address particularly detailed statutory requirements. A housing element must generally include the following parts:

Included:

✓ Review of previous element
✓ Housing needs assessment
✓ Inventory and analysis of adequate sites
✓ Analysis of potential governmental and non-governmental constraints ✓ Housing policies and programs
✓ Quantified objectives

Conservation Element:

The conservation element must address the “conservation, development, and utilization of natural resources including:

Included:

✓ Water and its hydraulic force
✓ Wildlife
✓ Natural Resources
✓ Soils

Not Applicable:

• Forests
• Rivers and other waters
• Harbors and fisheries

Open Space Element:

The Government Code § 65560 requires an open space element to contain detailed information about several categories of undevel oped land. Specifically, the open space element must inventory the following broad categories of open space:

Included:

✓ Open space for natural resources
✓ Open space for outdoor recreation
✓ Open space for public health and safety
✓ Open space for tribal resources

Not Applicable:

• Open space for military support
• Open space for managed production of resources

Noise Element

Noise is addressed under the Health, Safety, and Noise Element of the General Plan

The noise element should utilize the most accurate and up-to-date information available to reflect the noise environment, stationary sources of noise, predicted levels of noise, and the impacts of noise on local residents. It should be as detailed as necessary to describe the local situation and offer solutions to local noise issues. It must include the considerations of noise levels from:

Included:

✓ Highways and freeways
✓ Primary arterials and major local streets
✓ Passenger and freight online railroad operations and ground rapid transit systems ✓ Commercial, general aviation, heliport, helistop, and military airport operations, aircraft overflights, jet engine test stands, and all other ground facilities and maintenance functions related to airport operation Local industrial plants, including, but not l imited to, railroad classification yards

The noise element should be used to guide decisions concerning land use and the location of new roads and transit facilities since these are common sources of excessive noise levels.

Proposed land uses should be an alyzed to ensure they are compatible with existing uses in the surrounding area, especially residential developments and sensitive receptors, such as schools, hospitals, and places of worship. Additionally, construction noise, especially in urban areas, ca n be mitigated with policies such as limiting construction hours or days.

Quantitative analysis of noise appears in the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR).

Policy pertaining to noise mitigation appears in the General Plan Policy document.

Safety Element:

The safety element must, consistent with Government Code Section 65302(g), provide for the protection of the community from any unreasonable risks associated with the effects of:
✓ Seismically induced surface rupture, ground shaking, ground failure ✓ dam failure
✓ Subsidence
✓ Liquefaction
✓ Flooding
✓ Wildland and urban fires
✓ Climate change – Air Quality Element

Not applicable:

✓ Slope instability leading to mudslides and landslides ✓ Tsunami, seiche
✓ Other seismic hazards identified pursuant to Chapter 7.8 (commencing with Section 2690) of Division 2 of the Public Resources Code, and other geologic hazards known to the legislative body

Environmental Justice:

Senate Bill 1000 (Leyva, 2016) amended Government Code Section 65302 to require that both cities and counties that have disadvantaged communities incorporate Environmental Justice policies into their general plans, either in a separate Environmental Justice element or by integrating related goals, policies, and objectives throughout the other elements upon the adoption or next revision of two or more elements concurrently. The purpose of the legislation is to address the “unique or compounded health risks” in disadvantaged communities by decreasing pollution exposure, increasing community assets, and improving overall health. The law also seeks to facilitate transparency and public engagement in local governments’ planning and decision-making process, reduce harmful pollutants and the associated health risks in environmental justice communities and promote equitable access to health -inducing benefits, such as healthy food options, housing, public facilities, and recreation.

The City does not have a separate Environmental Justice element, however, the City has incorporated Environmental Justice Pol icies into the General Plan, since the General Plan’s adoption, as follows:

7.6.2 Environmental Justice

State law defines environmental justice as the fair treatment of people of all races, cultures, and incomes with respect to the development, adoption, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. Environmental justice b enefits include attractive and extensive green space, healthier children, fewer school days lost to illness and asthma, a more productive workforce, clean air and water, investment in pollution and noise abatement, and landscape improvements.

Policy H59 Health Initiatives

Facilitate the involvement of community residents, businesses, and organizations in the development, adoption, and implementation of community health initiatives.

Policy H60 Health and Land Use Decisions

Consider environmental justice issues as they are related to potential health impacts associated with land use decisions, including enforcement actions, to reduce the adverse health effects of hazardous materials, industrial activities, and other undesirable land uses on residents regardless of age, culture, ethnicity, gender, race, socioeconomic status, or geographic location.

Policy H61 Public Amenities

Consider environmental justice issues as they are related to the equitable provision of desirable public amenities such as parks, recreational facilities, and other beneficial uses that improve the quality of life.

Policy H62 Public Participation

Assure that all community residents have opportunities to participate in decisions that affect their environment and health, and ma ke accommodations for them to be involved in the decision - making processes.

Policy H63 Use of Communication Tools, New Media, and Technology

Use traditional communication tools as well as new media and technology to provide clear and current information on City processes and decisions and to encourage public participation in City government.

The General Plan is deficient in addressing Environmental Justice in the Air Quality element, specifically.

SB 1000 requires a local government to prepare an EJ Element or integrate EJ -related policies into other elements when both of the following conditions apply:

1. “The concurrent adoption or next revision of two or more other General Plan elements on or after January 1, 2018.” For example, if a local jurisdiction is simultaneously updating its Land Use and Circulation elements, it must prepare an EJ Element or integrate EJ policies throughout its General Plan as part of the update.

2. When a local jurisdiction identifies one or more disadvantaged communities (DACs) within its General Plan planning area.

DACs have been identified in the General Plan planning area; therefore, when two or more General Plan elements are amended, incorporation of Environmental Justice into the Air Quality element will be required.

Tribal Consultation - AB 168 Compliance

New state legislation effective on September 25, 2020 requires that this APR include a progress report on adopting or amending the General Plan and/or Open Space Element to ensure compliance with the obli gation to consult with California Native American Tribes and to identify and protect, preserve, and mitigate impacts to specified places, features, and objects in Sections 5097.9 and 5097.993 of the Public Resources Code (PRC), described below.

PRC 5097.9 states that no public agency or private party using or occupying public property shall interfere with the free expression or exercise of Native American religion nor cause severe or irreparable damage to any Native American sanctified cemetery, place of worship, religious or ceremonial site, or sacred shrine located on public property. Public property within City limits is exempt, except for parklands in excess of 100 acres. PRC 5097.993 states that a person that excavates, removes, destroys, injuries, or defaces certain Native American resources on public or private land (with some exceptions) is guilty of a misdemeanor if committed with specific malicious intent. Protected resources include Native American historic, cultural, or sacred sites on public land or private land that are listed or may be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historic Resources including any historic or prehistoric ruins, any burial ground, any archaeological or historic site, any inscriptions made by Native American s at such a site, any archaeological or historic Native American rock art, or any archaeological or historic features of a Native American historic, cultural, or sacred site.

In accordance with City policies and state law, tribal consultation is conducted for the following:

• Prior to adoption or amendment of the General Plan or specific plans on or after March 2, 2005, in accordance with Senate Bill 18;
• For Environmental Impact Reports and Negative Declarations effective July 1, 2015 for projects within geographical areas affiliated with tribes, per the California Environmental Quality Act and Assembly Bill 52; and
• For eligible housing projects requesting a streamlined ministerial approval process under Senate Bill 35 as of September 25, 2020, per Assembly Bill 168.

The City’s General Plan contains Tribal Consultation requirements, as follows, in accordance with State requirements:

5.6.2 Archaeological Resources

Native Americans have established many places which they consider sacred. Sacred sites vary in form, ranging from settlements where Native Americans lived to specific places of religious significance. Native American sites are confidential and their locati ons cannot be published. A board-certified archaeologist is qualified to review maps and data to identify their locations.

Policy O46 Archaeological Site Consultation

Consult with appropriate Native American associations about potential archaeological sites in the beginning stages of the development review process.

Policy O47 Archaeological Site Study

Require archaeological studies by a certified archeologist in areas of archeological potential significance prior to approval of development projects.

5.6.3 Cultural Resources

The City has a number of resources within Hanford that contribute to its unique culture, yet are not officially listed as historic resources. The Temple Theater, Fox Theater, Kings Art Center, Old Post Office, Bastille, Hanfor d Civic Auditorium, and Hanford Veteran’s Memorial Building are some of the cultural resources that the City treasures.

Policy O48 Cultural Site Consultation

Consult with the California Archaeological Inventory Southern San Joaquin Valley at California State University, Bakersfield about potential cultural sites on projects that could have an impact on cultural resources.

Policy O49 Cultural Site Discovery

Halt construction at a development site if cultural resources are encountered unexpectedly during construction

Recommendation: It is recommended that updates to the General Plan reference and incorporate further protections for sacred sites and places of worship per State law and the municipal code be updated as needed.

SUMMARY:

The City of Hanford has approved and undertaken several projects, which implement the goals and policies of the General Plan.

The General Plan is comprehensive and generally satisfies the requirements of the Office of Planning and Research, with some deficiencies, including:

1. Explicitly addressing environmental justice in the Air Quality Element

2. Incorporation of further protections for sacred sites and places of worship, per State law.

Jurisidiction Name
Reporting Calendar Year
First Name
Last Name
Title Click here to download APR Instructions
Email
Phone
Street Address
City
Zipcode
2_22_23
Click here to add rows to a table. If you add too many rows, you may select a cell in the row you wish to remove and type ctrl + d.
317 N Douty St
Hanford
93230
Diana
Black
Development Services Technician
[email protected]
5595854768
Mailing Address
Please Start Here
General Information
2022
Hanford
Contact Information
Optional: Click here to import last year's data. This is best used when the workbook is new and empty. You will be prompted to pick an old workbook to import from. Project and program data will be copied exactly how it was entered in last year's form and must be updated. If a project is no longer has any reportable activity, you may delete the project by selecting a cell in the row and typing ctrl + d.

Annual Progress Report January 2020

Optional: This runs a macro which checks to ensure all required fields are filled out. The macro will create two files saved in the same directory this APR file is saved in. One file will be a copy of the APR with highlighted cells which require information. The other file will be list of the problematic cells, along with a description of the nature of the error.

Optional: Save before running. This copies data on Table A2, and creates another workbook with the table split across 4 tabs, each of which can fit onto a single page for easier printing. Running this macro will remove the comments on the column headers, which contain the instructions. Do not save the APR file after running in order to preserve comments once it is reopened.

Optional: This macro identifies dates entered that occurred outside of the reporting year. RHNA credit is only given for building permits issued during the reporting year.

Link to the online system: https://apr.hcd.ca.gov/APR/login.do Submittal Instructions
Please save your file as Jurisdictionname2022 (no spaces). Example: the city of San Luis Obispo would save their file as SanLuisObispo2022 Housing Element Annual Progress Reports (APRs) forms and tables must be submitted to HCD and the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) on or before April 1 of each year for the prior calendar year; submit separate reports directly to both HCD and OPR pursuant to Government Code section 65400. There are two options for submitting APRs:

1. Online Annual Progress Reporting System - Please see the link to the online system to the left. This allows you to upload the completed APR form into directly into HCD’s database limiting the risk of errors. If you would like to use the online system, email [email protected] and HCD will send you the login information for your jurisdiction. Please note: Using the online system only provides the information to HCD. The APR must still be submitted to OPR. Their email address is [email protected].

2. Email - If you prefer to submit via email, you can complete the excel Annual Progress Report forms and submit to HCD at [email protected] and to OPR at [email protected]. Please send the Excel workbook, not a scanned or PDF copy of the tables.

Jurisdiction Hanford ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2016 - 01/31/2024
Date
Application
Submitted
Total
Approved
Units by
Project
Total
Disapproved
Units by
Project
Streamlining
2 3 4 6 7 8 9
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID+
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=Renter
O=Owner
Date
Application
Submitted+
(see
instructions)
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed
Restricted
Low-Income
Deed
Restricted
Low-Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income
Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Total PROPOSED
Units by Project
Total

APPROVED
Units by project
Total

DISAPPROVED
Units by Project
Was APPLICATION

SUBMITTED
Pursuant to GC
65913.4(b)?
(SB 35
Streamlining)
Did the housing
development
application seek
incentives or
concessions
pursuant to
Government Code
section 65915?
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 2 4 6 0 65 394 471 5 0 Table A
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
51 Project Identifier Unit Types Proposed Units - Affordability by Household Incomes Density Bo Applica
10 Housing Development Applications Submitted

Jurisdiction Hanford ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2022.00 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2016 - 01/31/2024
Table A2
Streamlining Infill
Housing without Financial
Assistance or Deed
Restrictions
Term of Affordability
or Deed Restriction Notes
2 3 1/5/1900 6 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Prior APN+ Current APN Street Addres s Project Name + Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID+
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=Renter
O=Owner
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed
R
estricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed
R
estricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Entitlement
Date Approved # of Units issued
Entitlements
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed
R
estricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed
R
estricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Building Permits
Date Is s ued
# of Units Issued
Building Permits
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate-
Income
Deed
R
estricted
Moderate-
Income Non
Deed
R
estricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Certificates of
Occupancy or other
forms of readiness
(see instructions)
Date Is s ued
# of Units
issue d
Certificates of
O
ccupancy or
other forms of
readines s
How many of
the units were
Extremely Low
I
ncome?
Was Project
APPROVED using
GC 65913.4(b)?
(SB 35
Streamlining)
Y/N
Infill Units?
Y/N+
Assista nce Progra ms
for Each Development
(may select multiple -
s
ee instructions)
Deed Restriction
Type
(may s elect
m
ultiple - see
instructions)
For units affordable without
financial as s is tance or deed
restrictions, explain how the
l
ocality determined the units
were affordable
(see instructions)
Term of Affordability or
Deed Res triction (years )
(if affordable in perpetuity
enter 1000)+
Number of
Demolished/Des
troyed Units
Demolished or
Destroyed Units
Demolished/De
stroyed Units
Owner or
Renter
Total Density Bonus Applied
to the Project (Percentage
Increase in Total Allowable
U
nits or Total Maximum
Allowable Residential Gross
Floor Area)
Number of Other
Incentives,
Conce ssions, W a ive rs,
o
r Other Modifications
Given to the Project
(Excluding Parking
Waivers or Parking
Reductions)
List the incentives,
concessions,
waivers , and
m
odifications
(Excluding Parking
Waivers or Parking
Modifications)
Did the project receive a
reduction or waiver of
parking standards? (Y/N)
Notes+
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 144 0 0 0 0 144 0 0 72 0 0 105 1 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 354 340 1 0 0 0 007-040-036 637 E
CAPISTRANO ST FY21-1513 SFD O 0 1 5/19/2021 1 1 1/20/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-011 2027 N FRONTIER
ST FY21-1594 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 3/10/2021 1 1 2/28/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-013 2051 N FRONTIER
ST FY21-1629 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 3/10/2021 1 1 2/24/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-014 2063 N FRONTIER
ST FY21-1630 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 3/19/2021 1 1 2/25/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-015 2075 N FRONTIER
ST FY21-1631 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 3/10/2021 1 1 2/25/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-012 2039 N FRONTIER
ST FY21-1698 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 3/10/2021 1 1 2/28/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-016 2087 N FRONTIER
ST FY21-1699 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 3/31/2021 1 1 2/24/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-017 2099 N FRONTIER
ST FY21-1700 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 3/10/2021 1 1 2/24/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-018 2570 W MALLARD
LN FY21-1701 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 3/19/2021 1 1 2/28/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-019 2578 W MALLARD
LN FY21-1738 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 7/2/2021 1 1 2/28/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-020 2586 W MALLARD
LN FY21-1739 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 4/12/2021 1 1 3/10/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-021 2594 W MALLARD
LN FY21-1740 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 4/12/2021 1 1 3/14/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-096 2605 W MALLARD
LN FY21-1741 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 7/2/2021 1 1 4/13/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-097 2597 W MALLARD
LN FY21-1742 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 7/2/2021 1 1 3/29/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-098 2589 W MALLARD
LN FY21-1743 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 7/2/2021 1 1 3/23/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-099 2581 W MALLARD
LN FY21-1744 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 7/2/2021 1 1 3/29/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-001 1907 N FRONTIER
ST FY21-1797 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 3/23/2021 1 1 2/24/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
0009-480-002 1919 N FRONTIER
ST FY21-1798 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 3/31/2021 1 1 2/24/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-003 1931 N FRONTIER
ST FY21-1799 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 3/23/2021 1 1 2/24/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-001 1943 N FRONTIER
ST FY21-1800 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 3/23/2021 1 1 2/24/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-005 1955 N FRONTIER
ST FY21-1801 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 3/31/2021 1 1 2/24/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-006 1967 N FRONTIER
ST FY21-1802 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 3/23/2021 1 1 2/24/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-007 1979 N FRONTIER
ST FY21-1803 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 3/31/2021 1 1 2/24/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-008 1991 N FRONTIER
ST FY21-1804 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 3/31/2021 1 1 2/24/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-009 2003 N FRONTIER
ST FY21-1805 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 3/31/2021 1 1 2/24/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-010 2015 N FRONTIER
ST FY21-1806 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 3/31/2021 1 1 2/24/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-070 2601 W PEAR
LAKE LN FY21-1888 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 7/6/2021 1 1 3/24/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-380-071 2593 W PEAR
LAKE LN FY21-1889 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 7/2/2021 1 1 3/24/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
0009-480-072 2585 W PEAR
LAKE LN FY21-1890 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 7/2/2021 1 1 3/16/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-073 2582 W PEAR
LAKE LN FY21-1891 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 7/2/2021 1 1 3/14/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-074 2590 W PEAR
LAKE LN FY21-1892 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 7/2/2021 1 1 3/18/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-075 2598 W PEAR
LAKE LN FY21-1893 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 7/2/2021 1 1 4/26/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-076 2606 W PEAR
LAKE LN FY21-1894 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 7/6/2021 1 1 4/22/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
007-480-001 634 E SAN
MIGUEL FY21-1902 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 7/21/2021 1 1 3/18/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
008-690-015 1630 BERKSHIRE
LN FY21-1916 SFD O 2/ 14/2018 0 1 7/27/2021 1 1 3/23/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
007-480-025 3337 N BAUTISTA
AVE FY21-1982 SFD O 0 1 10/15/2021 1 1 10/6/2022 1 0 N Y SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
008-690-017 1666 BERKSHIRE
LN FY21-2051 SFD O 2/ 14/2018 0 1 8/27/2021 1 1 4/7/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-030-143
1890

CENTENNIAL DR
A
FY21-2056 5+ R 11/ 4/2020
0 32 9/7/2021 32 32 12/22/2022 32 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-030-143
1880

CENTENNIAL DR
B
FY21-2057 5+ R 11/ 4/2020
0 16 9/7/2021 16 16 12/22/2022 16 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-095 2613 W MALLARD
LN FY21-2131 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 7/6/2021 1 1 5/3/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-093 2629 W MALLARD
LN FY21-2133 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 7/6/2021 1 1 5/4/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-022 2602 W MALLARD
LN FY21-2134 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 7/6/2021 1 1 5/20/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-023 2610 W MALLARD
LN FY21-2135 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 7/6/2021 1 1 5/20/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-024 2618 W MALLARD
LN FY21-2137 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 7/6/2021 1 1 5/24/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-094 2621 W MALLARD
LN FY21-2176 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 7/9/2021 1 1 4/25/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-025 2626 W MALLARD
LN FY21-2177 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 2 7/9/2021 2 5/25/2022 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-069 2609 W PEAR
LAKE LN FY21-2182 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 1 7/6/2021 1 4/19/2022 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-077 2614 W PEAR
LAKE LN FY21-2183 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 1 7/6/2021 1 4/25/2022 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-078 2622 W PEAR
LAKE LN FY21-2184 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 1 8/6/2021 1 4/20/2022 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-068 2617 W PEAR
LAKE LN FY21-2185 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 1 8/2/2021 1 4/28/2022 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-067 2625 W PEAR
LAKE LN FY21-2186 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 1 7/9/2021 1 4/29/2022 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-036 2024 N MITCHELL
ST FY21-2187 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 1 8/6/2021 1 5/6/2022 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-037 2012 N MITCHELL
ST FY21-2188 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 1 7/9/2021 1 5/11/2022 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-026 2634 W MALLARD
ST FY21-2261 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 1 7/9/2021 1 5/23/2022 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-027 2642 W MALLARD
ST FY21-2262 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 1 7/9/2021 1 5/25/2022 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-028 2120 N MITCHELL
ST FY21-2263 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 1 7/9/2021 1 6/16/2022 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-029 2108 N MITCHELL
ST FY21-2264 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 1 7/9/2021 1 6/16/2022 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-030 2096 N MITCHELL
ST FY21-2265 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 1 7/9/2021 1 6/22/2022 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-031 2084 N MITCHELL
ST FY21-2266 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 7/9/2021 1 1 6/22/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-038 2000 N MITCHELL
ST FY21-2272 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 8/6/2021 1 1 5/9/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-039 1988 N MITCHELL
ST FY21-2273 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 8/6/2021 1 1 5/18/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-040 1976 N MITCHELL
ST FY21-2274 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 8/6/2021 1 1 6/2/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-041 1964 N MITCHELL
ST FY21-2275 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 8/10/2021 1 1 6/13/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-042 1952 N MITCHELL
ST FY21-2276 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 8/10/2021 1 1 6/22/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-043 2644 W ANDREW
LN FY21-2277 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 8/10/2021 1 1 6/27/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-044 2636 W ANDREW
LN FY21-2278 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 8/10/2021 1 1 6/27/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-450-074 2054 N SHERMAN
ST FY21-2400 SFD O 0 1 6/28/2021 1 1 1/21/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-500-032 2125
LODGEPOLE ST FY21-2627 SFD O 12/ 23/2019 0 1 7/26/2021 1 1 6/27/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-500-033 2133
LODGEPOLE ST FY21-2628 SFD O 12/ 23/2019 0 1 7/26/2021 1 1 6/27/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
008-410-050 2018 PLEASANT
WY FY21-2705 SFD O 8/ 31/2021 0 1 9/21/2021 1 1 8/12/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-033 2060 N MITCHELL
ST FY21-2707 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 8/17/2021 1 1 7/22/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-034 2048 N MITCHELL
ST FY21-2708 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 8/17/2021 1 1 7/22/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-035 2036 N MITCHELL
ST FY21-2709 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 8/17/2021 1 1 7/22/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-092 2624 W HEATHER
LN FY21-2710 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 8/13/2021 1 1 9/1/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-045 2628 W HEATHER
LN FY21-2711 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 8/10/2021 1 1 7/1/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-066 2620 W ANDREW
LN FY21-2712 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 8/13/2021 1 1 6/29/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-064 2604 W ANDREW
LN FY21-2713 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 8/13/2021 1 1 7/19/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-032 2072 N MITCHELL
ST FY21-2714 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 8/13/2021 1 1 8/1/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-065 2612 W ANDREW
LN FY21-2715 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 8/13/2021 1 1 7/14/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-079 2627 W HEATHER
LN FY21-2790 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 9/1/2021 1 1 9/1/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-080 2619 W HEATHER
LN FY21-2791 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 9/1/2021 1 1 9/1/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-089 2600 W HEATHER
LN FY21-2792 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 9/1/2021 1 1 9/28/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-090 2608 W HEATHER
LN FY21-2793 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 9/1/2021 1 1 9/22/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-091 2616 W HEATHER
LN FY21-2794 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 9/1/2021 1 1 8/19/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-046 1944 N SOPHIA
CT FY21-2795 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 10/4/2021 1 1 9/7/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-047 1936 N SOPHIA
CT FY21-2796 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 8/31/2021 1 1 8/29/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-061 2580 W ANDREW
LN FY21-2797 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 8/31/2021 1 1 8/17/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-062 2588 W ANDREW
LN FY21-2798 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 10/4/2021 1 1 7/26/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-063 2596 W ANDREW
LN FY21-2799 SFD O 12/ 20/2020 0 1 8/31/2021 1 1 7/25/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-050 2101 W
VINEYARD CT FY21-2800 SFD O 9/ 1/2020 0 1 8/24/2021 1 1 3/29/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-051 2102 W
VINEYARD CT FY21-2801 SFD O 9/ 1/2020 0 1 8/24/2021 1 1 2/18/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-049 2113 W
VINEYARD CT FY21-2802 SFD O 9/ 1/2020 0 1 8/24/2021 1 1 4/14/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-052 2114 W
VINEYARD CT FY21-2803 SFD O 9/ 1/2020 0 1 8/24/2021 1 1 2/18/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-500-035 2149
LODGEPOLE ST FY21-2816 SFD O 12/ 3/2019 0 1 7/26/2021 1 1 6/29/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-500-034 2141
LODGEPOLE ST FY21-2817 SFD O 12/ 3/2019 0 1 7/26/2021 1 1 10/27/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-048 2125 W
VINEYARD CT FY21-2820 SFD O 9/ 1/2020 0 1 8/24/2021 1 1 4/14/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-053 2126 W
VINEYARD CT FY21-2822 SFD O 9/ 1/2020 0 1 8/24/2021 1 1 3/15/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-047 2137 W
VINEYARD CT FY21-2823 SFD O 9/ 1/2020 0 1 8/24/2021 1 1 4/14/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-048 2138 W
VINEYARD CT FY21-2824 SFD O 9/ 1/2020 0 1 8/24/2021 1 1 2/22/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-046 2149 W
VINEYARD CT FY21-2921 SFD O 9/ 1/2020 0 1 9/14/2021 1 1 4/27/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-055 2150 W
VINEYARD CT FY21-2922 SFD O 9/ 1/2020 0 1 9/14/2021 1 1 4/22/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-045 2161 W
VINEYARD CT FY21-2923 SFD O 9/ 1/2020 0 1 9/14/2021 1 1 4/22/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-056 2162 W
VINEYARD CT FY21-2924 SFD O 9/ 1/2020 0 1 9/14/2021 1 1 4/22/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-500-060 2604 CHIANTI WY FY21-2954 S FD O 9/1/2020 0 1 8/10/2021 1 1 6/30/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-500-061 2596 CHIANTI WY FY21-2955 S FD O 9/1/2020 0 1 8/10/2021 1 1 7/29/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-500-015 2603 CHIANTI WY FY21-2956 S FD O 9/1/2020 0 1 8/10/2021 1 1 11/18/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-500-016 2595 CHIANTI WY FY21-2957 S FD O 9/1/2020 0 1 8/10/2021 1 1 6/29/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-041 2100 CORTNER
ST FY21-2991 SFD O 9/ 1/2020 0 1 9/14/2021 1 1 5/31/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-042 2112 CORTNER
ST FY21-2992 SFD O 9/ 1/2020 0 1 9/14/2021 1 1 5/31/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-043 2124 CORTNER
ST FY21-2993 SFD O 9/ 1/2020 0 1 9/14/2021 1 1 5/31/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-044 2136 CORTNER FY21-2994 S FD O 9/1/2020 0 1 9/14/2021 1 1 5/31/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-500-036 2157
LODGEPOLE ST FY21-3096 SFD O 12/ 3/2019 0 1 8/10/2021 1 1 11/18/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-600-037 2470 MUSCAT ST FY21-3097 S FD O 12/3/2019 0 1 9/27/2021 1 1 10/18/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
Density Bonus
1 Unit Types Affordability by Household Incomes - Completed Entitlement Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy 4 7 10
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Housing with Financial Assistance
and/or Deed Restrictions Demolished/Destroyed UnitsP roject Identifier Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units

Jurisdiction Hanford ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2022.00 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2016 - 01/31/2024
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
009-480-088 2592 W HEATHER
LN FY22-0021 SFD O 12/3/2019 0 1 9/15/2021 1 1 10/17/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-087 2584 W HEATHER
LN FY22-0022 SFD O 12/3/2019 0 1 9/22/2021 1 1 10/19/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-086 2576 W HEATHER
LN FY22-0023 SFD O 12/3/2019 0 1 9/15/2021 1 1 10/24/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-082 2603 W HEATHER
LN FY22-0024 SFD O 12/3/2019 0 1 9/22/2021 1 1 10/18/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-081 2611 W HEATHER
LN FY22-0025 SFD O 12/3/2019 0 1 9/15/2021 1 1 9/22/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-048 1928 N SOPHIA
CT FY22-0047 SFD O 12/3/2019 0 1 9/23/2021 1 1 9/6/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-049 1920 N SOPHIA
CT FY22-0048 SFD O 12/3/2019 0 1 9/23/2021 1 1 9/2/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-051 1913 N SOPHIA
CT FY22-0050 SFD O 12/3/2019 0 1 10/20/2021 1 1 9/27/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-052 1921 N SOPHIA
CT FY22-0051 SFD O 12/3/2019 0 1 11/10/2021 1 1 10/5/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-570-018 1779 S DINKY
CREEK RD FY22-0130 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 9/17/2021 1 1 3/24/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-570-017 1787 S DINKY
CREEK RD FY22-0131 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 9/17/2021 1 1 3/24/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-570-016 1795 S DINKY
CREEK RD FY22-0132 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 9/17/2021 1 1 5/2/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-570-023 1735 S DINKY
CREEK RD FY22-0133 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 10/25/2021 1 1 5/12/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-570-022 1743 S DINKY
CREEK RD FY22-0134 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 10/25/2021 1 1 4/29/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-570-021 1755 S DINKY
CREEK RD FY22-0135 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 10/25/2021 1 1 5/4/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-570-020 1763 S DINKY
CREEK RD FY22-0136 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 10/25/2021 1 1 5/2/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-570-011 1300 W POPPY
SPRINGS CT FY22-0137 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 11/2/2021 1 1 4/27/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-570-012 1312 W POPPY
SPRINGS CT FY22-0138 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 10/7/2021 1 1 2/22/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-570-013 1324 W POPPY
SPRINGS CT FY22-0139 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 10/7/2021 1 1 2/22/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-570-014 1336 W POPPY
SPRINGS CT FY22-0140 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 10/7/2021 1 1 2/22/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-570-015 1348 W POPPY
SPRINGS CT FY22-0141 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 10/7/2021 1 1 2/24/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-580-038 1336 W KENNY
THOMPSON CT FY22-0187 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 10/1/2021 1 1 5/19/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-580-040 1360 W KENNY
THOMPSON CT FY22-0190 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 10/1/2021 1 1 5/20/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-580-041 1372 W KENNY
THOMPSON CT FY22-0191 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 10/1/2021 1 1 5/20/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-580-042 1384 W KENNY
THOMPSON CT FY22-0192 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 10/1/2021 1 1 6/9/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-580-034 1317 W KENNY
THOMPSON CT FY22-0193 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 10/7/2021 1 1 5/2/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-580-035 1305 W KENNY
THOMPSON CT FY22-0194 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 11/2/2021 1 1 5/3/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-580-036 1312 W KENNY
THOMPSON CT FY22-0195 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 11/2/2021 1 1 5/12/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-580-018 1323 W
SAWTOOTH PL FY22-0197 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 10/7/2021 1 1 5/10/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-580-019 1311 W
SAWTOOTH PL FY22-0198 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 10/7/2021 1 1 5/10/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-580-020 1314 W
SAWTOOTH PL FY22-0199 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 10/7/2021 1 1 5/10/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-580-021 1326 W
SAWTOOTH PL FY22-0200 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 10/7/2021 1 1 5/10/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-580-014 1371 W
SAWTOOTH PL FY22-0267 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 10/25/2021 1 1 6/1/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-580-015 1359 W
SAWTOOTH PL FY22-0268 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 11/10/2021 1 1 6/8/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-580-016 1347 W
SAWTOOTH PL FY22-0269 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 11/10/2021 1 1 6/23/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-580-017 1335 W
SAWTOOTH PL FY22-0270 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 11/10/2021 1 1 6/1/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-570-024 1727 S DINKY
CREEK RD FY22-0271 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 11/29/2021 1 1 8/11/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-570-025 1719 S DINKY
CREEK RD FY22-0272 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 11/29/2021 1 1 6/9/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-570-027 1703 S DINKY
CREEK RD FY22-0274 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 11/29/2021 1 1 7/12/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-053 1929 N SOPHIA
CT FY22-0312 SFD O 4/19/2018 0 1 10/20/2021 1 1 10/10/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-056 1950 N FRONTIER
ST FY22-0315 SFD O 4/19/2018 0 1 10/20/2021 1 1 10/28/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-058 1926 N FRONTIER
ST FY22-0317 SFD O 4/19/2018 0 1 10/21/2021 1 1 11/2/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-009 2165 CORTNER
ST FY22-0426 SFD O 4/19/2018 0 1 12/3/2021 1 1 6/8/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-010 2153 CORTNER
ST FY22-0427 SFD O 9/1/2020 0 1 12/3/2021 1 1 5/31/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-011 2141 CORTNER
ST FY22-0428 SFD O 9/1/2020 0 1 12/3/2021 1 1 5/31/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-500-038 2482 MUSCAT ST FY22-0476 SFD O 9/1/2020 0 1 9/27/2021 1 1 11/21/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-500-039 2494 MUSCAT ST FY22-0477 SFD O 12/3/2019 0 1 10/4/2021 1 1 11/18/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-500-013 2619 CHIANTI WY FY22-0480 SFD O 12/3/2019 0 1 10/11/2021 1 1 8/11/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-500-014 2611 CHIANTI WY FY22-0481 SFD O 12/3/2019 0 1 10/11/2021 1 1 9/22/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-500-059 2612 CHIANTI WY FY22-0483 SFD O 12/3/2019 0 1 10/4/2021 1 1 8/10/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-084 2587 W HEATHER
LN FY22-0562 SFD O 12/3/2019 0 1 10/15/2021 1 1 11/8/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-520-018 2042 W
VINEYARD CT FY22-0603 SFD O 9/1/2020 0 1 12/9/2021 1 1 5/31/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-520-019 2054 W
VINEYARD CT FY22-0605 SFD O 9/1/2020 0 1 12/9/2021 1 1 5/31/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-520-021 2078 W
VINEYARD CT FY22-0607 SFD O 9/1/2020 0 1 12/9/2021 1 1 6/3/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-520-022 2090 W
VINEYARD CT FY22-0608 SFD O 9/1/2020 0 1 12/9/2021 1 1 6/1/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-059 1914 N FRONTIER
ST FY22-0626 SFD O 4/19/2018 0 1 11/10/2021 1 1 11/1/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-520-023 2089 W
VINEYARD CT FY22-0647 SFD O 4/19/2018 0 1 12/29/2021 1 1 6/1/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-520-024 2077 W
VINEYARD CT FY22-0648 SFD O 4/19/2018 0 1 12/29/2021 1 1 6/2/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-520-025 2065 W
VINEYARD CT FY22-0649 SFD O 4/19/2018 0 1 12/29/2021 1 1 6/7/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-520-026 2053 W
VINEYARD CT FY22-0650 SFD O 4/19/2018 0 1 12/29/2021 1 1 6/8/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-520-028 2264 NAPA DR FY22-0652 SFD O 4/19/2018 0 1 12/29/2021 1 1 6/23/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-520-029 2252 NAPA DR FY22-0653 SFD O 4/19/2018 0 1 12/29/2021 1 1 6/28/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-520-030 2240 NAPA DR FY22-0654 SFD O 4/19/2018 0 1 12/29/2021 1 1 6/28/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-037 2052 CORTNER
ST FY22-0668 SFD O 9/1/2020 0 1 12/29/2021 1 1 6/24/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-039 2076 CORTNER
ST FY22-0670 SFD O 9/1/2020 0 1 12/29/2021 1 1 6/16/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-040 2088 CORTNER
ST FY22-0671 SFD O 9/1/2020 0 1 12/29/2021 1 1 6/16/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-500-062 2580 CHIANTI ST FY22-0733 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 11/5/2021 1 1 7/25/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-500-057 2628 CHIANTI ST FY22-0734 SFD O 12/3/2019 0 1 11/5/2021 1 1 6/30/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-500-012 2627 CHIANTI S FY22-0735 SFD O 12/3/2019 0 1 11/5/2021 1 1 11/18/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-580-030 1365 W KENNY
THOMPSON DR FY22-0859 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 12/23/2021 1 1 7/18/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-580-031 1353 W KENNY
THOMPSON DR FY22-0860 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 12/23/2021 1 1 7/28/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-580-032 1341 W KENNY
THOMPSON DR FY22-0861 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 12/23/2021 1 1 7/13/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-580-033 1329 W KENNY
THOMPSON DR FY22-0862 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 12/23/2021 1 1 7/11/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-570-028 1695 S DINKY
CREEK RD FY22-0863 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 12/23/2021 1 1 6/29/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-570-029 1687 S DINKY
CREEK RD FY22-0864 SFD O 8/31/2021 0 1 12/23/2021 1 1 8/25/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-033 2057 CORTNER
ST FY22-0985 SFD O 9/1/2020 0 1 12/23/2021 1 1 9/15/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-035 2028 CORTNER
ST FY22-0988 SFD O 9/1/2020 0 1 12/29/2021 1 1 8/25/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-036 2040 CORTNER
ST FY22-0989 SFD O 9/1/2020 0 1 11/9/2021 1 1 8/25/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-500-074 2491 MUSCAT ST FY22-1024 SFD O 12/3/2019 0 1 11/9/2021 1 1 7/27/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-500-058 2620 CHIANTI WY FY22-1025 SFD O 12/3/2019 0 1 11/9/2021 1 1 8/12/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-500-075 2503 MUSCAT ST FY22-1026 SFD O 12/3/2019 0 1 11/9/2021 1 1 7/27/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-500-010 2126 N MITCHELL
ST FY22-1236 SFD O 12/3/2019 0 1 12/8/2021 1 1 8/5/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
5+ R
0 0 0 1 N N HHAP, LIHTC, NPLH,
Other DB BASED ON SOURCES OF
FUNDING 55 80.0% 1 Other YES

ADD'L FUNDING
SOURCES: PLHA,

WHOLE PERSON
CARE; 71 UNITS ARE

DEED RESTRICTED-
LOW INCOME; 1

MGR'S UNIT--INCOME
LEVEL TBD; 22 UNITS

SUPPORTIVE

HOUSING
012-124-002 203 E THIRD ST 502-1143 2 to 4 R 2 5/20/2021 2 0 0 N Y SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
012-281-004 1119 & 1121 W
SEVENTH ST 502-1145 2 to 4 R 2 3/24/2021 2 0 0 N Y SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
012-240-050 1000 W SEVENTH
ST 502-1147 SFD O 5 8/20/2021 5 0 0 N Y SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
010-051-021 1345 N GREEN ST 502-1149 ADU O 1 4/19/2021 1 0 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
010-121-046 CAMERON ST &
N 10TH AVE 502-1185 5+ R 20 12/16/2021 20 0 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
010-330-026 W GRANGEVILLE 502-1155 5+ R 18 10/28/2021 18 0 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-200-056 1818 W
COLUMBIA WY 502-1157 ADU O 1 6/2/2021 1 0 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
010-013-008 1608 N KAWEAH
ST 502-1158 ADU O 1 6/2/2021 1 0 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
010-260-018 419 KAWEAH ST 502-1174 2 to 4 R 2 12/13/2021 2 0 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-450-002 1028 JORDAN WY 502-1188 2 to 4 R 2 12/17/2021 2 0 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
011-450-003 1044 JORDAN WY 502-1189 2 to 4 R 2 12/17/2021 2 0 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-012 2039 N FRONTIER
ST
514-0388
FY21-1698 ADU O 2 2/23/2021 2 2 3/10/2021 2 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-002 1919 N FRONTIER
ST
514-0390
FY21-1798 ADU O 1 3/18/2021 1 1 3/31/2021 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
010-172-010 908 KAWEAH ST 514-0410 ADU O 1 7/29/2021 1 1 6/7/2021 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-005 1955 N FRONTIER
ST
514-0391
FY21-1801 ADU O 1 3/18/2021 1 1 3/31/2021 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-008 1991 N FRONTIER
ST
514-0392
FY21-1804 ADU O 1 3/19/2021 1 1 3/31/2021 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-075 2598 W PEAR

LAKE LN
514-0393
FY21-1893 ADU O 1 3/20/2021 1 1 7/2/2021 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-072 2585 W PEAR

LAKE LN
514-0394
FY21-1890 ADU O 1 3/21/2021 1 1 7/2/2021 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
012-271-008 801 W SEVENTH
ST 514-0395 ADU O 1 3/22/2021 1 0 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-036 2024 N MITCHELL
ST
514-0396
FY21-2187 ADU O 1 3/23/2021 1 1 8/6/2021 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-068 2617 W PEAR

LAKE LN
514-0397
FY21-2185 ADU O 1 3/24/2021 1 1 8/2/2021 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-078 2622 W PEAR

LAKE LN
514-0398
FY21-2184 ADU O 1 3/25/2021 1 1 8/6/2021 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-025 2626 W MALLARD
LN
514-0399
FY21-2177 ADU O 1 3/26/2021 1 1 7/9/2021 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-041 1964 N MITCHELL
ST
514-0401
FY21-2275 ADU O 1 3/27/2021 1 1 8/10/2021 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-200-056 1818 W
COLUMBIA WY 514-0402 ADU O 1 3/28/2021 1 0 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
010-013-008 1608 N KAWEAH
ST 514-0404 ADU O 1 3/29/2021 1 0 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-065 2612 W ANDREW
LN
514-0408
FY21-2715 ADU O 1 3/30/2021 1 1 8/13/2021 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
010-051-021 1345 N GREEN ST 514-0389 ADU O 1 3/31/2021 1 0 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-032 2072 N MITCHELL
ST
514-0409
FY21-2714 ADU O 1 4/1/2021 1 0 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
010-172-010 908 KAWEAH ST 514-0410 ADU O 1 4/2/2021 1 0 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-082 2603 W HEATHER
LN
514-0411
FY22-0024 ADU O 1 4/3/2021 1 1 9/22/2021 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-005 1912 N SOPHIA
CT
514-0413
FY22-0049 ADU O 1 4/4/2021 1 1 10/15/2021 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-057 1938 N FRONTIER
ST
514-0414
FY22-0316 ADU O 1 4/5/2021 1 1 10/21/2021 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-053 1929 N SOPHIA
CT
514-0415
FY22-0312 ADU O 1 8/26/2021 1 1 10/20/2021 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-062 2588 W ANDREW
LN
514-0416
FY21-2978 ADU O 1 9/29/2021 1 1 10/4/2021 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-480-046 1944 N SOPHIA
CT
514-0417
FY21-2795 ADU O 1 9/29/2021 1 1 10/4/2021 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-040-032 2121

CHARDONNAY PL
514-0418
FY22-1029 ADU O 1 11/5/2021 1 4/26/2022 0 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA

Jurisdiction Hanford ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2022.00 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2016 - 01/31/2024
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
011-580-036 1312 W KENNY

THOMPSON CT
514-0419
FY22-0195 ADU O 1 11/2/2021 1 11/2/2021 0 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-034 2045 Cortner St FY22-0986 SFD O
0 1 12/23/2021 1 1 08/23/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-035 2228 Napa Dr FY22-1156 SFD O
0 1 1/4/2022 1 1 07/07/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-036 2216 Napa Dr FY22-1157 SFD O
0 1 1/4/2022 1 1 07/19/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-037 2204 Napa Dr FY22-1158 SFD O
0 1 1/4/2022 1 1 07/19/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-038 2192 Napa Dr FY22-1159 SFD O
0 1 1/4/2022 1 1 07/28/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-039 2117 Cortner St FY22-1199 SFD O
0 1 1/4/2022 1 1 10/13/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-040 2093 Cortner St FY22-1200 SFD O
0 1 1/4/2022 1 1 09/15/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-041 2081 Cortner St FY22-1201 SFD O
0 1 1/4/2022 1 1 09/15/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-042 2069 Cortner St FY22-1202 SFD O
0 1 1/4/2022 1 1 09/30/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-043 1798 S Dinky Creek Rd FY22-1296 SFD O
0 1 1/13/2022 1 1 10/06/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-044 1419 W Sawtooth Pl FY22-1330 SFD O
0 1 3/8/2022 1 1 10/06/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-045 1948 S Red Rock Dr FY22-1331 SFD O
0 1 3/8/2022 1 1 10/26/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-046 2198 N Bordeaux Dr FY22-1376 SFD O
0 1 3/16/2022 1 1 10/14/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-047 2190 N Bordeaux Dr FY22-1377 SFD O
0 1 3/16/2022 1 1 11/10/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-048 2182 N Bordeaux Dr FY22-1378 SFD O
0 1 3/16/2022 1 1 10/26/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-049 2174 N Bordeaux Dr FY22-1379 SFD O
0 1 3/16/2022 1 1 10/21/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-050 2180 Napa Dr FY22-1417 SFD O
0 1 1/31/2022 1 1 12/16/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-051 2168 N Napa Dr FY22-1418 SFD O
0 1 1/31/2022 1 1 08/31/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-052 2156 Napa Dr FY22-1419 SFD O
0 1 1/31/2022 1 1 09/22/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-053 2144 Napa Dr FY22-1420 SFD O
0 1 1/31/2022 1 1 09/23/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-054 1936 S Red Rock Dr FY22-1521 SFD O
0 1 5/16/2022 1 1 10/28/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-055 1924 S Red Rock Dr FY22-1522 SFD O
0 1 5/16/2022 1 1 10/26/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-056 1912 S Red Rock Dr FY22-1523 SFD O
0 1 6/17/2022 1 1 12/29/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-057 1900 S Red Rock Dr FY22-1524 SFD O
0 1 4/11/2022 1 1 10/21/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-058 2635 Chianti Way FY22-1537 SFD O
0 1 1/26/2022 1 1 09/12/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-059 2059 Muscat Pl FY22-1568 SFD O
0 1 3/18/2022 1 1 11/08/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-060 2047 Muscat Pl FY22-1569 SFD O
0 1 3/18/2022 1 1 12/05/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-061 2050 Muscat Pl FY22-1570 SFD O
0 1 3/18/2022 1 1 11/08/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-062 2062 Muscat Pl FY22-1572 SFD O
0 1 3/18/2022 1 1 11/22/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-063 2146 N Bordeaux Dr FY22-1741 SFD O
0 1 4/11/2022 1 1 12/08/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-064 2134 N Bordeaux Dr FY22-1742 SFD O
0 1 5/11/2022 1 1 12/09/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-065 2122 N Bordeaux Dr FY22-1743 SFD O
0 1 5/11/2022 1 1 12/16/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-066 2116 N Bordeaux Dr FY22-1744 SFD O
0 1 5/11/2022 1 1 12/16/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-067 2609 Muscat Ct FY22-1778 SFD O
0 1 3/14/2022 1 1 10/06/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-068 2641 Muscat Ct FY22-1779 SFD O
0 1 3/14/2022 1 1 10/21/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-069 2142 N Mitchell St FY22-1955 SFD O
0 1 3/14/2022 1 1 11/17/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-070 2134 N Mitchell St FY22-1956 SFD O
0 1 3/14/2022 1 1 11/29/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-071 2601 Muscat Ct FY22-1981 SFD O
0 1 3/24/2022 1 1 10/06/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-072 2625 Muscat Ct FY22-1982 SFD O
0 1 3/14/2022 1 1 10/10/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-073 1962 S Mill Rd FY22-2011 SFD O
0 1 6/7/2022 1 1 11/18/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-074 1467 W Sawtooth Pl FY22-2012 SFD O
0 1 6/7/2022 1 1 11/18/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-075 1455 W Sawtooth Pl FY22-2015 SFD O
0 1 6/7/2022 1 1 11/30/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-076 2083 Muscat Pl FY22-2054 SFD O
0 1 4/14/2022 1 1 12/27/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-077 2071 Muscat Pl FY22-2066 SFD O
0 1 5/31/2022 1 1 12/01/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-078 2074 Muscat Pl FY22-2067 SFD O
0 1 4/14/2022 1 1 12/01/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-079 2086 Muscat Pl FY22-2068 SFD O
0 1 4/11/2022 1 1 11/29/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-080 2095 W Chianti Way FY22-2131 SFD O
0 1 5/19/2022 1 1 12/01/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-081 2085 W Chianti Way FY22-2132 SFD O
0 1 5/19/2022 1 1 12/13/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-082 2060 W Chianti Way FY22-2133 SFD O
0 1 5/16/2022 1 1 12/15/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-083 1398 W Sawtooth Pl FY22-1014 SFD O
0 1 1/4/2022 1 1 08/30/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-084 1407 W Sawtooth Pl FY22-1076 SFD O
0 1 1/6/2022 1 1 10/05/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-085 1395 W Sawtooth Pl FY22-1077 SFD O
0 1 1/6/2022 1 1 09/23/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-086 1383 W Sawtooth Pl FY22-1078 SFD O
0 1 1/6/2022 1 1 09/23/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-087 1742 S Dinky Creek Rd FY22-1239 SFD O
0 1 1/13/2022 1 1 09/29/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-088 1750 S Dinky Creek Rd FY22-1240 SFD O
0 1 1/13/2022 1 1 08/25/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-089 1758 S Dinky Creek Rd FY22-1241 SFD O
0 1 1/13/2022 1 1 08/31/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-090 1766 S Dinky Creek Rd FY22-1244 SFD O
0 1 1/13/2022 1 1 09/19/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-091 1428 Victory Ct FY22-1249 SFD O
0 1 1/10/2022 1 1 10/06/2022 1 0 N Y SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-092 1774 S Dinky Creek Rd FY22-1292 SFD O
0 1 1/13/2022 1 1 09/19/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-093 1782 S Dinky Creek Rd FY22-1293 SFD O
0 1 1/13/2022 1 1 09/29/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-094 1790 S Dinky Creek Rd FY22-1294 SFD O
0 1 1/13/2022 1 1 10/20/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-095 2070 W Chianti Way FY22-2134 SFD O
0 1 5/16/2022 1 1 12/27/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-096 2033 Pleasant Way FY22-2200 SFD O
0 1 7/11/2022 1 1 12/16/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-097 2075 W Chianti Way FY22-2204 SFD O
0 1 5/24/2022 1 1 12/13/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-098 2065 W Chianti Way FY22-2205 SFD O
0 1 5/24/2022 1 1 12/20/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-099 2040 W Chianti Way FY22-2206 SFD O
0 1 5/24/2022 1 1 12/13/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-100 2050 W Chianti Way FY22-2207 SFD O
0 1 5/24/2022 1 1 12/13/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-101 2506 Muscat Street FY22-2347 SFD O
0 1 5/9/2022 1 1 12/14/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-102 2045 W Chianti Way FY22-2359 SFD O
0 1 5/24/2022 1 1 12/21/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-103 2035 W Chianti Way FY22-2361 SFD O
0 1 5/24/2022 1 1 12/27/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-104 2030 W Chianti Way FY22-2362 SFD O
0 1 5/24/2022 1 1 12/20/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-105 1911 S Mill Rd FY22-2441 SFD O
0 1 8/11/2022 1 1 12/27/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-106 1947 S Mill Rd FY22-2445 SFD O
0 1 5/25/2022 1 1 12/07/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-107 1302 S Autumn Breeze Ct FY22-2446 SFD O
0 1 7/13/2022 1 1 12/27/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-108 1310 S Autumn Breeze Ct FY22-2447 SFD O
0 1 6/2/2022 1 1 12/21/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-109 1313 W Angus Ct FY22-2448 SFD O
0 1 6/2/2022 1 1 12/20/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-110 1305 W Angus Ct FY22-2451 SFD O
0 1 7/13/2022 1 1 12/20/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-111 1309 S Autumn Breeze Ct FY22-2485 SFD O
0 1 5/25/2022 1 1 12/29/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-112 1301 S Autumn Breeze Ct FY22-2486 SFD O
0 1 7/13/2022 1 1 12/21/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-113 2166 N Bordeaux Dr FY22-2571 SFD O
0 1 6/2/2022 1 1 12/28/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-114 2095 Muscat Pl FY22-2573 SFD O
0 1 6/2/2022 1 1 12/27/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-115 2098 Muscat Pl FY22-2574 SFD O
0 1 6/23/2022 1 1 12/27/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-116 2025 W Chianti Way FY22-2637 SFD O
0 1 5/25/2022 1 1 12/27/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-117 2015 W Chianti Way FY22-2638 SFD O
0 1 5/25/2022 1 1 12/27/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-118 2005 W Chianti Way FY22-2639 SFD O
0 1 5/25/2022 1 1 12/27/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-119 2120 Napa Dr FY22-2641 SFD O
0 1 5/25/2022 1 1 12/27/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-120 1938 S Mill Rd FY22-2672 SFD O
0 1 6/7/2022 1 1 11/30/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-121 1950 S Mill Rd FY22-2673 SFD O
0 1 6/7/2022 1 1 12/02/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-122 1457 W Poppy Springs Ln FY22-2751 SFD O
0 1 6/2/2022 1 1 12/21/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-123 1445 W Poppy Springs Ln FY22-2752 SFD O
0 1 6/2/2022 1 1 12/16/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-124 1304 W Angus Ct FY22-2812 SFD O
0 1 7/29/2022 1 1 12/21/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-125 1312 W Angus Ct FY22-2813 SFD O
0 1 6/17/2022 1 1 12/21/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-126 1317 W Butterfield Ln FY22-2814 SFD O
0 1 6/17/2022 1 1 12/20/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-127 1309 W Butterfield Ln FY22-2815 SFD O
0 1 6/17/2022 1 1 12/29/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-128 1326 W Butterfield Ln FY22-2886 SFD O
0 1 7/13/2022 1 1 12/22/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-129 1334 W Butterfield Ln FY22-2887 SFD O
0 1 7/13/2022 1 1 12/21/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-130 1342 W Butterfield Ln FY22-2889 SFD O
0 1 7/13/2022 1 1 12/21/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-131 1350 W Butterfield Ln FY22-2890 SFD O
0 1 7/13/2022 1 1 12/29/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-132 1358 W Butterfield Ln FY22-2983 SFD O
0 1 8/12/2022 1 1 12/27/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-133 1366 W Butterfield Ln FY22-2984 SFD O
0 1 8/12/2022 1 1 12/27/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-134 1382 W Butterfield Ln FY22-2986 SFD O
0 1 8/12/2022 1 1 12/29/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-135 1390 W Butterfield Ln FY22-2987 SFD O
0 1 8/12/2022 1 1 12/29/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-136 1398 W Butterfield Ln FY22-2988 SFD O
0 1 8/12/2022 1 1 12/27/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-137 1726 S Dinky Creek Rd FY22-0865 SFD O
0 1 12/23/2021 1 1 06/28/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-138 1964 Pleasant Way FY22-0934 SFD O
0 1 4/12/2022 1 1 11/22/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-139 1912 N Sophia Ct FY22-0049 SFD O
0 1 10/15/2021 1 1 09/23/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-140 1979 Pleasant Way FY22-0168 SFD O
0 1 1/25/2022 1 1 06/21/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-141 1324 W Kenny Thompson Ct FY22-0196 SFD O
0 1 10/7/2021 1 1 05/03/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-142 1938 N Frontier St FY22-0316 SFD O
0 1 10/20/2021 1 1 10/31/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-143 2064 Cortner St FY22-0669 SFD O
0 1 12/29/2021 1 1 06/17/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-144 1907 Pleasant Way FY22-0723 SFD O
0 1 1/25/2022 1 1 08/04/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
009-510-145 1350 W Sawtooth Pl FY22-0838 SFD O
0 1 1/4/2022 1 1 07/08/2022 1 0 N N SURVEY OF COMPARABLE

UNITS IN THE AREA
007-270-007 664 NORTH STAR
DR FY22-1323 (Bldg 1) 5+ R 51 9/6/2022
51 51 8/26/2022 51 0 0 N N HHAP, LIHTC, NPLH,
Other DB BASED ON SOURCES
OF FUNDING 80.0% 1 Other Yes

ADD'L FUNDING
SOURCES: PLHA,

WHOLE PERSON
CARE; 71 UNITS
(BLDGS 1 & 2

COMBINED) ARE

DEED RESTRICTED-
LOW INCOME; 1

MGR'S UNIT--INCOME
LEVEL TBD; 22 UNITS

WILL BE

SUPPORTIVE

HOUSING

Jurisdiction Hanford ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2022.00 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2016 - 01/31/2024
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
007-270-007 682 NORTH STAR
DR FY22-1324 (Bldg 2) 5+ R 21 9/6/2022
21 21 8/26/2022 21 0 0 N N HHAP, LIHTC, NPLH,
Other DB BASED ON SOURCES
OF FUNDING 80.0% 1 Other Yes

ADD'L FUNDING
SOURCES: PLHA,

WHOLE PERSON
CARE; 71 UNITS
(BLDGS 1 & 2

COMBINED) ARE

DEED RESTRICTED-
LOW INCOME; 22

UNITS WILL BE

SUPPORTIVE

HOUSING
007-270-007 664 NORTH STAR
DR 502-1142 5+ R 72 9/6/2022
72 0 0 0 N N HHAP, LIHTC, NPLH,
Other DB 80.0% 1 Other Yes

ADD'L FUNDING
SOURCES: PLHA,

WHOLE PERSON
CARE; 71 UNITS
(BLDGS 1 & 2

COMBINED) ARE

DEED RESTRICTED-
LOW INCOME; 1

MGR'S UNIT--INCOME
LEVEL TBD; 22 UNITS

WILL BE

SUPPORTIVE
HOUSING0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0

Jurisdiction Hanford ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2022.00 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2016 - 01/31/2024
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0

Jurisdiction Hanford ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2022.00 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2016 - 01/31/2024
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0

Jurisdiction Hanford ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2016 - 01/31/2024
1 Projection Period 3 4
RHNA Allocation by
Income Level 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total Units to Date (all years)
Total Remaining
RHNA by Income
Level
Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - - Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - - Deed Restricted - - - - - - - 72 - - Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - - Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - - Non-Deed Restricted - 49 6 - 25 129 240 105 - - Above Moderate 2,049 - 276 177 202 214 34 93 1 - - 997 1,052 4,832
- 325 183 202 239 163 333 178 - - 1,623 3,209 5 6 7
Extremely low-Income
Need 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total Units to Date
Total Units
Remaining
549 - - - - - - - - - - 549 Please note: The APR form can only display data for one planning period. To view progress for a different planning period, you may login to HCD's online APR system, or contact HCD staff at [email protected].
311
-
This table is auto-populated once you enter your jurisdiction name and current year data. Past year information comes from previous APRs.
554 Moderate
1,097
821
865
Please contact HCD if your data is different than the material supplied here 72 2
Table B
Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress
Permitted Units Issued by Affordability
1,097
749
Please note: For the last year of the 5th cycle, Table B will only include units that were permitted during the portion of the year that was in the 5th cycle. For the first year of the 6th cycle, Table B will only include units that were permitted since the start of the planning period. Projection Period units are in a separate column.

Total RHNA
Total Units
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Extremely Low-Income Units*
Note: units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income RHNA progress and must be reported as very low-income units in section 7 of Table A2. They must also be reported in the extremely low-income category (section 13) in Table A2 to be counted as progress toward meeting the extremely low-income housing need determined pursuant to Government Code 65583(a)(1). *Extremely low-income houisng need determined pursuant to Government Code 65583(a)(1). Value in Section 5 is default value, assumed to be half of the very low-income RHNA. May be overwritten.

Progress toward extremely low-income housing need, as determined pursuant to Government Code 65583(a)(1).

Jurisdiction Hanford ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2016 - 01/31/2024
Date of Rezone Rezone Type
2 4 5 6 7 9 10 11
APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Date of Rezone Very Low-
Income Low-Income Moderate-Income Above Moderate-
Income
Rezone Type Parcel Size
(Acres)
General Plan
Designation Zoning Minimum
Density Allowed
Maximum
Density Allowed
Realistic
Capacity Vacant/Nonvacant Description of Existing
Uses
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
83 Project Identifier RHNA Shortfall by Household Income Category Sites Description 1 Sites Identified or Rezoned to Accommodate Shortfall Housing Need and No Net-Loss Law Table C

Jurisdiction Hanford
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
1 2 3 4
Name of Program Objective Timeframe in H.E Status of Program Implementation HOUSING REHAB ASSIST 10-15 HOUSEHOLDS, IF FUNDS
ARE AVAILABLE.

THROUGHOUT PLANNING
PERIOD ASSISTED 13 REHAB PROJECTS

PRESERVATION OF AT-

RISK AFFORDABLE

HOUSING

MONITOR THE STATUS OF PUBLICLY
ASSISTED AFFORDABLE UNITS. THE

CITY WILL CONTACT QUALIFIED

NONPROFITS REGARDING POTENTIAL

OPT-OUT PROJECTS, ENSURE THAT

PROPERTY OWNERS COMPLY WITH

NOTICING REQUIREMENTS, SUPPORT

THE ACQUISITION OF AT-RISK

PROPERTIES BY NONPROFITS, AND

PURSUE GRANTS TO SUPPORT THE

PRESERVATION OF AFFORDABLE AT-
RISK HOUSING.

THROUGHOUT PLANNING
PERIOD

CITY STAFF CONTINUES TO MONITOR THE STATUS OF PUBLICLY ASSISTED AFFORDABLE UNITS ON AN ONGOING BASIS.

Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation

ADEQUATE SITES

FACILITATE THE CONSTRUCTION OF

NEW HOUSING THROUGH THE

PROVISION OF ADEQUATELY ZONED

SITES TO MEET HANFORD'S HOUSING
NEEDS ALLOCATION OF 4,832 UNITS.

INCREASE ALLOWABLE DENSITIES

FOR MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT AS

PART OF THE COMPREHENSIVE
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE.

THROUGHOUT PLANNING
PERIOD

CURRENTLY, THE CITY HAS ADEQUATE SITES TO ACCOMMODATE ITS SHARE

OF THE REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ALLOCATION, HOWEVER, WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR PROJECTED EMPLOYMENT AND POPULATION GROWTH.

DENSITY BONUS

PROGRAM

CONTINUE TO PUBLICIZE AND

IMPLEMENT THE DENSITY BONUS

ORDINANCE TO ASSIST

DEVELOPMENT OF AFFORDABLE
HOUSING.

THROUGHOUT PLANNING
PERIOD
THE CITY GRANTED A DENSITY BONUS OF 80% OF THE NUMBER OF UNITS FOR

LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS TO THE NORTHSTAR APARTMENTS
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN ORDER TO PERMIT 32 ADDITIONAL UNITS.

PLANNED UNIT

DEVELOPMENT

CONTINUE TO UTILIZE THE PUD

PROCESS TO ENCOURAGE UNIQUE

DESIGN AND DEVELOP HOUSING THAT
ADDRESSES SITE CONSTRAINTS.

THROUGHOUT PLANNING
PERIOD

THE CITY WILL CONTINUE TO UTILIZE THE PUD PROCESS FOR THOSE PROJECTS WITH SITE CONSTRAINTS.

FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER

PROGRAMS
ASSIST 5-7 FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYERS.

SUPPORT NON-PROFIT HOUSING

ORGANIZATIONS IN WORKING WITH

HCD TO REMOVE CONSTRAINTS ON
THE USE OF HOME FUNDS.

THROUGHOUT PLANNING
PERIOD
THE CITY ASSISTED 3 FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYERS DUE TO THE IMPACT OF THE

CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC, INCREASED SALES PRICES OF HOMES, AND LOW INVENTORY.

SECTION 8 RENTAL

ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

ASSIST KINGS COUNTY HOUSING

AUTHORITY IN PROMOTING THE
SECTION 8 PROGRAM.

THROUGHOUT PLANNING
PERIOD

CITY STAFF WILL CONTINUE TO PROMOTE AND REFER PERSONS TO THE SECTION 8 PROGRAM ADMINISTERED BY THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF KINGS COUNTY.

AFFORDABLE HOUSING

ASSISTANCE

SEEK APPLICABLE GRANTS FROM

STATE AND FEDERAL SOURCES

INCLUDING FUNDING SPECIFICALLY

TARGETED TO ELI HOUSING, PROVIDE

AN INVENTORY OF HOUSING SITES TO

INTERESTED DEVELOPERS, CONTINUE

TO PROVIDE A DENSITY BONUS TO

QUALIFYING PROJECTS, PROVIDE

FINANCIAL AND REGULATORY

ASSISTANCE , SUCH AS REDUCED

FEES AND/OR MODIFIED

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, FEE

REDUCTIONS AND CONCURRENT

PROCESSING OF LOT MERGERS FOR

MULTI-FAMILY PROJECTS THAT

INCLUDE UNITS AFFORDABLE TO

LOWER-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS, AND

CONTINUE TO PURSUE HOUSING

PRODUCTION AND REHABILITATION

WITH NONPROFITS, INCUDING

ASSISTANCE IN PREPARING GRANT
APPLICATIONS. HOUSING FOR VERY

LOW- AND EXTREMELY LOW-INCOME

HOUSEHOLDS AND PERSONS WITH

DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES WILL
BE PRIORITIZED WHERE FEASIBLE. IN

ADDITION, THE CITY'S AFFORDABLE

HOUSING INCENTIVES WILL BE

PROMOTED THROUGH OUTREACH TO

PROVIDERS, ON THE WEBSITE AND IN

HANDOUTS PROVIDED AT THE
PLANNING COUNTER. ENSURE

CONFORMANCE WITH GOVERNMENT

THROUGHOUT PLANNING
PERIOD

THE CITY RECEIVED FUNDING FROM PLHA GRANT PROGRAM FOR

DEVELOPMENT OF AFFORDABLE OWNER-OCCUPIED HOMES AND PROVIDE

SECONDARY FINANCING FOR IDLEWOOD INFILL LOTS AND PARKSIDE PROJECTS. ALSO ASSIST WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF NORTHSTAR

APARTMENTS, AN AFFORDABLE MULTIFAMILY PROJECT SERVING LOW-TO

VERY LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS TO INCLUDE PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING UNITS. THE CITY PROVIDED FUNDS FOR THE SUNRISE APARTMENTS

PROJECT TO ASSIST IN THE RENOVATION OF THE STARDUST MOTEL AND

PARTNERED WITH KINGS/TULARE HOMELESS ALLIANCE TO PROVIDE PERMANENT HOUSING FOR LOW- TO VERY LOW-INCOME RESIDENTS.

FARMWORKER AND

EMPLOYEE HOUSING

ASSIST INTERESTED DEVELOPERS IN

IDENTIFYING SITES AND PREPARING
FUNDING APPLICATIONS.

THROUGHOUT PLANNING
PERIOD
35 OF 72 UNITES OF THE NORTHSTAR APARTMENTS PROJECT WILL BE ALLOCATED TO FARMWORKERS AND THEIR FAMILIES.

EMERGENCY SHELTERS
&

TRANSITIONAL/SUPPORTI

VE HOUSING

CONTINUE TO FACILITATE THE

ESTABLISHMENT OF EMERGENCY

SHELTERS AND

TRANSITIONAL/SUPPORTIVE HOUSING
IN CONFORMANCE WITH SB2;

CONTINUE TO SUPPORT EFFORTS

WITH SURROUNDING KINGS COUNTY

JURISDICTIONS TO MEET THE NEEDS

OF PEOPLE WHO ARE HOMELESS OR
TRANSITIONING TO INDEPENDENCE.

THROUGHOUT PLANNING
PERIOD

THE CITY PROVIDES FUNDING AND WORKS CLOSELY WITH THE KINGS/TULARE

HOMELESS ALLIANCE AS WELL AS OTHER CITY SOCIAL SERVICES, AGENCIES, GROUPS AND ORGANIZATIONS. THE CITY OBTAINED CDBG-CV2 AND CDBG-CV3

GRANT FUNDS FOR THESE ORGANIZATIONS TO PREVENT, PREPARE FOR, AND RESPOND TO CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19).

HOUSING FOR PERSONS

WITH DISABILITIES

CONTINUE TO MONITOR LEGAL

REQUIREMENTS AND LOCAL

CONDITIONS AND UPDATE LOCAL

REGULATIONS, IF NECESSARY, TO

REMOVE ANY IMPEDIMENTS TO

HOUSING FOR PERSONS WITH
DISABILITIES.

THROUGHOUT PLANNING
PERIOD

CITY STAFF CONTINUES TO ENSURE CONFORMANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS AND CODES FOR ADA COMPLIANCE.

PROMOTE EQUAL

HOUSING

OPPORTUNITIES

HANFORD WILL CONTINUE TO REFER

FAIR HOUSING INQUIRIES TO THE

DEPARTMENT OF FAIR EMPLOYMENT

AND HOUSING OFFICE IN FRESNO AND

DISTRIBUTE FAIR HOUSING

INFORMATION AT CITY HALL, ON THE

CITY WEBSITE, AND AT OTHER PUBLIC
OFFICES. SUPPORT THE

RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SAN

JOAQUIN VALLEY FAIR HOUSING AND
EQUITY ASSESSMENT.

THROUGHOUT PLANNING
PERIOD

STAFF WILL PARTNER WITH KINGS COUNTY CITIES TO PROVIDE FAIR HOUSING

EDUCATION, TRAINING WORKING PROFESSIONALS AND NON-PROFITS

DEDICATED TO PROVIDING SERVICES REGARDING HOUSING DISCRIMINATION,

FAIR HOUSING OUTREACH/EDUCATION, AND TENANT/LANDLORD RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES.

General Comments

Jurisdiction Hanford ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Period 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2016 - 01/31/2024
Description of Commercial
Development Bonus
Commercial Development Bonus
Date Approved
3 4
APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Very Low
Income
Low
Income
Moderate
Income
Above Moderate
Income
Description of Commercial
Development Bonus
Commercial Development Bonus
Date Approved
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Units Constructed as Part of Agreement
Commercial Development Bonus Approved pursuant to GC Section 65915.7 Table E
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Project Identifier
1 2
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation
formulas
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Annual Progress Report January 2020

Jurisdiction Hanford ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Period 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2016 - 01/31/2024
The description should adequately document how each
unit complies with subsection (c) of Government Code
Section 65583.1+.

For detailed reporting requirements, see the chcklist
here:

Extremely Low-
Income+ Very Low-Income+ Low-Income+ TOTAL UNITS+
Extremely Low-
Income+
Very Low-
Income+ Low-Income+ TOTAL UNITS+
https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-
development/docs/adequate-sites-checklist.pdf
Rehabilitation Activity
Preservation of Units At-Risk
Acquisition of Units
Mobilehome Park Preservation
Total Units by Income
Table F
Please note this table is optional: The jurisdiction can use this table to report units that have been substantially rehabilitated, converted from non-affordable to affordable by acquisition, and preserved, including mobilehome park preservation, consistent with the standards set forth in Government Code section 65583.1, subdivision (c). Please note, motel, hotel, hostel rooms or other structures that are converted from non-residential to residential units pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1(c)(1)(D) are considered net-new housing units and must be reported in Table A2 and not reported in Table F.

Activity Type
Units that Do Not Count Towards RHNA+
Listed for Informational Purposes Only
Units that Count Towards RHNA +
Note - Because the statutory requirements severely limit what can be counted, please contact HCD at [email protected] and we will unlock the form which enable you to populate these fields.

Units Rehabilitated, Preserved and Acquired for Alternative Adequate Sites pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1(c) Annual Progress Report January 2020

Jurisdiction Hanford
Reporting Period 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2016 - 01/31/2024
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below

For up to 25 percent of a jurisdiction’s moderate-income regional housing need allocation, the plan

Project Identifier
1

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Note: "+" indicates
an optional field
Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain a
2 3
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Unit Category
(2 to 4,5+)
Tenure
R=Renter
Very Low-
Income Deed
Restricted
Very Low-
Income Non
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income Deed
Restricted
Table F2
Above Moderate Income Units Converted to Moderate Income Pursuan nning agency may include the number of units in an existing multifamily building that were converted to de this table, please ensure housing developments meet the requirements descr Unit Types Affordability by Hou

auto-calculation formulas
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate- Income
Deed Restricted
Moderate- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Total Moderate Income Units
Converted from Above
Moderate

nt to Government Code section 65400.2
eed-restricted rental housing for moderate-income households by the imposition of affordability covenants a ribed in Government Code 65400.2(b).
54 sehold Incomes After Conversion Units credited toward Ab RHNA

Notes
6 Date Converted Notes

and restrictions for the unit. Before adding information to

ove Moderate

Jurisdiction Hanford
Reporting Period 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2016 - 01/31/2024 ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Housing Element Implementation
2 3 4
APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Realistic Capacity
Identified in the
Housing Element
Entity to whom the site
transferred Intended Use for Site
1 Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation
formulas
Table G
Locally Owned Lands Included in the Housing Element Sites Inventory that have been sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of Project Identifier
NOTE: This table must only be filled out if the housing element sites inventory contains a site which is or was owned by the reporting jurisdiction, and has been sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of during the reporting year.

Jurisdiction Hanford
Reporting Period 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
1 2 3 4
APN Street Address/Intersection Existing Use Number of
Units
018-242-042 SOUTH 11TH AVE BETWEEN IONA AVE &
INDUSTRY AVE Vacant
008-192-011 ALONG KENSINGTON WAY, BETWEEN
RICHARDSON WAY AND LELAND WAY Vacant
012-211-009 211 BALL PARK ALLEY, BETWEEN BROWN
ST AND HARRIS ST Vacant
011-440-021 &-020 TWO PROPERTIES, SE CORNER OF
HANFORD-ARMONA RD & 10 1/2 AVE Vacant
010-253-001 426 W LACEY BLVD Commercial
011-090-004 SW CORNER 12TH AVE & WOODLAND DR
(LOTS A & B) Vacant
008-360-006 CORTNER ST, W OF HIDDEN VALLY PARK Vacant
012-053-005 218 N DOUTY ST Commercial
010-265-001 & -002

A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED N

OF EIGHTH ST, BETWEEN DOUTY & IRWIN
STREETS ("THE BASTILLE")
Public Facilities
012-041-017 THE CARNEGIE MUSEUM Public Facilities
011-490-001 THRU -
004 IDLEWOOD WAY, W OF GREENBRIER DR Residential 4
012-086-004 Hotel parking lot, SEC of Sixth & Redington Sts Public Facilities NOTE: This tab
ALL surplus/ex
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Parcel Identifier

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS
Housing Element Implemen
Table H
Locally Owned Surplus Site
For Kings County jurisdictions, please format the APN's

010-265-001 113 COURT ST (only a portion of the entire
parcel) Public Facilities

Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation
formulas
Designation Size Notes
5 6 7
Surplus
Designation
Parcel Size (in
acres) Notes
Surplus Land 0.29
Surplus Land 0.23
Surplus Land 0.172
Surplus Land 0.78
Surplus Land 2
FORMERLY GOODWILL. IN

PROCESS OF BEING LEASED TO
MSI
Surplus Land 1.245
Surplus Land 18 TO BE REZONED TO OPEN SPACE
Surplus Land 0.41 MECHANICS BANK
Surplus Land 0 BUILDING & PATIO IN CIVIC PARK
Surplus Land 0.32
Surplus Land 0.52 4 LOTS TO BE DEVELOPED AS

AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Surplus Land 0.619 PUBLIC PARKING LOT
ble is meant to contain an invenory of
xcess lands the reporting jurisdiction
owns

S REPORT
ntation

es
as follows:999-999-999-999

Surplus Land 2.63
OLD KINGS CO COURTHOUSE;

PARCEL SIZE GIVEN IS FOR
ENTIRE PARCEL; THE OLD

COURTHOUSE IS ONLY A

PORTION OF THE PARCEL

Jurisdiction Hanford ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Note: + indicates an
optional field
Reporting Period 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain
auto-calculation
formulas
Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2016 - 01/31/2024
Project Type Date
2 3
APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Activity Date Very Low
Income
Low
Income
Moderate
Income
Above Moderate
Income
Table I
Units Constructed Pursuant to Government Code 65852.21 and Applications for Lot Splits Pursuant to Government Code 66411.7 (SB9) NOTE: SB 9 PROJECTS ONLY. This table only
needs to be completed if there were lot splits
applied for pursuant to Government Code
66411.7 OR units constructed pursuant to
65852.21.

Units entitled/permitted/constructed must also
be reported in Table A2. Applications for
these units must be reported in Table A.

Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Project Identifier Unit Constructed
1 4
Annual Progress Report January 2020

Jurisdiction Hanford ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Period 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2016 - 01/31/2024
Project Type Date
2 3
APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Unit Category
(SH - Student Housing) Date Very Low- Income
Deed Restricted
Very Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Low- Income Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Moderate- Income
Deed Restricted
Moderate- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
Above
Moderate-
Income
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Note
Cells in g
Table J
Student housing development for lower income students for which was granted a density bonus pursuant to subparagraph (F) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 65915 Project Identifier Units (Beds/Student Capacity) Approved 1 4
NOTE: STUDENT HOUSING WITH DENSITY BONUS ONLY. This
table only needs to be completed if there were student housing projects WITH a density bonus approved pursuant to
Government Code65915(b)(1)(F)
Annual Progress Report January 2020

Jurisdiction Hanford
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2016 - 01/31/2024
Current Year
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 72
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 105
1 178
Units by Structure Type Entitled Permitted Completed
SFA 0 0 0
SFD 0 106 292
2 to 4 0 0 0
5+ 144 72 48
ADU 0 0 0
MH 0 0 0
Total 144 178 340
369
471
5 0
0 0
0 0
Income Rental Ownership Total
Very Low 0 0 0
Low 0 0 0
Moderate 0 0 0
Above Moderate 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Units Constructed - SB 35 Streamlining Permits
Number of Streamlining Applications Approved
Total Developments Approved with Streamlining
Total Units Constructed with Streamlining
Total Housing Applications Submitted:

Number of Proposed Units in All Applications Received:

Total Housing Units Approved:

Total Housing Units Disapproved:

Total Units
Housing Applications Summary
Use of SB 35 Streamlining Provisions
Note: Units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income permitted units totals Number of Applications for Streamlining
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary

Jurisdiction Hanford
Reporting Year 2022 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Total Award Amount
Task $ Amount Awarded $ Cumulative Reimbursement
Requested

COMPREHENSIVE CITY-WIDE

VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED

ANALYSIS AND GUIDELINES
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SB 743
$65,000.00 $0.00

MUNICIPAL CODE

AMENDMENTS TO UPDATE
SECTION 17.60-ACCESSORY

DWELLING UNIT STANDARDS

AND UPDATE TO SECTION

17.50.120 HOUSING DENSITY

AND OTHER INCENTIVES
$35,000.00 $48,965.52

PURCHASING OF EQUIPMENT
PERTAINING TO THE SB2
GRANT
$50,000.00 $0.00
Summary of entitlements, building permits, and certificates of occupancy (auto-populated from Tab Deed Restricted
Non-Deed Restricted
Deed Restricted
Non-Deed Restricted

L

Please update the status of the proposed uses listed in the entity’s application for funding and the c 50515.02 or 50515.03, as applicable.
$
Completed Entitlement Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low

Deed Restricted
Non-Deed Restricted
Deed Restricted
Non-Deed Restricted
Deed Restricted
Non-Deed Restricted
Deed Restricted
Non-Deed Restricted
Deed Restricted
Non-Deed Restricted
Deed Restricted
Non-Deed Restricted
Deed Restricted
Non-Deed Restricted
Total Units
Certificate of Occupancy Issued by Affordability Summary Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Units
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Units
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low

Total award amount is auto-populated based on amounts entered in rows 15-26. ble A2)
Current Year
0 0
144
0 ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) Reporting
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Completed
corresponding impact on housing within the region or jurisdiction, as applicable, categorized based on the

150,000.00
Task Status
Completed
Completed

0 0
0 144
Current Year
0 0
72 0
0 105
1 178
Current Year
0 0
0 0
0 0
354
354

Other
Funding Notes
None
None
Other SB 2 planning grants
program

e eligible uses specified in Section

12.E.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 4/4/2023 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Authorization to award a contract for GIS On-Call Services to GEOinovo at a cost not to exceed $25,000 per fiscal year.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: That the City Council, by motion, Authorize City Staff to enter into an agreement with GEOinovo to provide GIS services for an amount not to exceed $25,000 per fiscal year

Recommended Motion: I move to Authorize City Staff to enter into an agreement with GEOinovo to provide GIS services for an amount not to exceed $25,000 per fiscal year BACKGROUND:

A geographic information system (GIS) is a system that creates, manages, analyzes, and maps all types of data. GIS connects data to a map, integrating location data (where things are) with all types of descriptive information (what things are like there). This provides a foundation for mapping and analysis that is used in science and almost every industry. GIS helps users understand patterns, relationships, and geographic context. The benefits include improved communication and efficiency, as well as better management and decision making.

Currently, the City does not have staff available to update, modify, or create GIS files. The City's GIS system is used for mapping, land use data, and utility billing purposes but could be expanded to be used for public safety and public works needs. An on-call consulting firm would allow City departments to request GIS services when needed. On December 23, 2022 the City circulated a Request for Proposals (RFP) for On-Call GIS services. In the RFP, the City identified several tasks where GIS services would be desired on an as-needed basis:

1. Project Meeting/GIS System Assessment
Consultant will conduct a comprehensive assessment of the City’s current GIS resources and develop project schedules.

2. GIS System Administration Maintenance/Updates
Consultant will update the City’s GIS files to reflect currently land use, zoning, utility locations, etc.

Consultant will integrate the City’s GIS files with all City software applications including but not limited to Tyler EnerGov, Tyler Munis and ArcGIS Online. Consultant will provide general maintenance for the City of Hanford GIS system.

3. Internal File System Development

Consultant will update the City’s internal GIS file system aimed at making GIS data accessible to City Staff. The system will contain all the layers hosted on the ArcGIS Online system, allowing staff to search for information relating to parcels, zoning, utilities, etc.

4. Training
Consultant will provide comprehensive, hands-on training and support in GIS software to staff.

The City received fourteen proposals from interested firms and, based on the scoring criteria, GEOinovo received the highest overall score. If approved, City Staff would enter into an agreement with GEOinovo for an amount not exceeding $25,000 per fiscal year.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Costs would be assumed by the department requesting services. Overall costs associated with the contract would not exceed $25,000 per year.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Proposal Scores

2. Resolution

GIS Proposal Score Summary
Firm Average Score
4 Creeks 87.00
Arinigeo 92.00
Blue Raster 83.00
Canopy Mapping 85.00
DCSE 93.00
Dymaptic 87.33
GEOinovo 93.67
Geospatial Enterprise 81.00
GTG 89.33
Langan 93.33
Paraum 82.67
QK 84.00
Urban Gis 78.00
Yamabe Horn 92.00

RESOLUTION NO. 23-05-R

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HANFORD AUTHORIZING

CITY STAFF TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH GEOINOVO TO PROVIDE GIS SERVICES FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $25,000 PER FISCAL YEAR At a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford duly called and held on the 4th day of April 2023, it was moved by Council Member , seconded by Council Member , and carried that the following resolution be adopted:

WHEREAS, the City circulated a Request for Proposals for GIS Services on December 23, 2022 and accepted proposals until February 3, 2023; and WHEREAS, the City scored the proposals in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the Request for Proposals; and
WHEREAS, GEOinovo received the highest score from the scoring committee, and WHEREAS, this agreement between GEOinovo and the City of Hanford may not exceed $25,000 per year unless approved by City Council
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that City Council of the City of Hanford authorizes City Staff to enter into an agreement with GEOinovo to provide GIS services for an amount not to exceed $25,000 per fiscal year.

PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 4th day of April, 2023 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

MAYOR of the City of Hanford
Attest:

Natalie Corral
City Clerk

12.F.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 4/4/2023 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Authorization to award a contract to Alta Transportation in the amount of $253,000 to create an Active Transportation Plan (ATP) and appropriate $284,811 from the Transportation Fund, which includes $32,668 of the required 11.47% local cash match.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: The Council appropriates $284,811 from the Transportation Fund, which includes $32,688 of the required local cash match, and awards the contract to Alta Planning and Design Inc for $235,000 to create an Active Transportation Plan (ATP).

Recommended Motion: The Council appropriates $284,811 from the Transportation Fund, which includes $32,688 of the required local cash match, and awards the contract to Alta Planning and Design Inc for $235,000 to create an Active Transportation Plan (ATP).

BACKGROUND:

On October 27, 2022, the City of Hanford submitted a Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant application to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), requesting $224,143 to create an Active Transportation Plan (ATP) to update the 2016 Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan. In May 2023, the City was awarded $224,423 to create an ATP. This project will last twenty-six months and conclude in June 2025 (see attached Cost and Schedule).

The existing bicycle and pedestrian networks within the City of Hanford are disjointed and incomplete, with high-stress segments, missing sections of sidewalk and bicycle facilities, and significant barriers (Highway 198 and UPRR Railroad) which lack clear, safe, and comfortable crossings for active transportation users. Additionally, the City of Hanford is poised for significant growth over the next decade from the California High-Speed Rail Kings/Tulare station, currently under construction on the City's eastern edge. This presents an opportunity to leverage this significant regional transportation asset and facilitate a more significant modal shift towards active transportation.

The City of Hanford will develop an Active Transportation Plan (ATP) to provide the community with a clear roadmap to guide investments in non-motorized infrastructure, policies, and programs. The Plan will enhance bicyclist and pedestrian safety, facilitate modal shifts out of personal vehicles, and improve the quality of life for Hanford's large disadvantaged community. Half the population (29,651 people) live in poor census tracts (scoring in the bottom 10.8% according to Healthy Places Index and CalEnviroscreen 4.0 scores from 91-99). Hanford does not have a robust multimodal network (Class I, Class IV, and no buffered Class II bike lanes; standard Class II bike lanes exist on only

three streets). There is currently no dedicated space for bicyclists to cross Highway 198 safely, thus creating a barrier between high-poverty neighborhoods and the majority of essential services and jobs.

Furthermore, 13 of 16 Class III bike routes are high-speed (35 mph and up) roadways with no dedicated space or lane markings. As a result, residents suffer from high crash rates within disadvantaged communities. Despite the lack of connected, comfortable routes, people living in underprivileged areas use active transportation more frequently than 45.5% of all California census tracts (Attachment 2B-3). This Plan will engage the public with a focus on hearing from historically marginalized stakeholders to reflect their needs.

The City will invite participation from the Kings County Action Organization, Tachi Yokut Tribe, local businesses and employers, Kings County Association of Governments, and Caltrans District 6. In addition, the Plan will identify first/last mile to transit connections to align with the forthcoming California High-Speed Rail (HSR) Kings/Tulare Station. The final Plan will include a prioritized list of recommendations, including planning level cost estimates and implementation strategy (see attached Work Plan). In addition, the City will refine the top three priority projects into project concepts, including 15% design-level concepts for future grant applications.

This project will thoroughly review the existing conditions within the City of Hanford and gather feedback from the public to identify existing issues, concerns, and deficiencies for active transportation users. The project will evaluate current levels of traffic stress, equity considerations, demand, and mode shift potential in addition to specific locations identified by the public through an interactive mapping exercise. The project will ultimately produce an Active Transportation Plan for the City, which includes a prioritized list of active transportation infrastructure projects and non- infrastructure programs/policies for improving active transportation in the City of Hanford, as well as implementation guidance.

On January 10, 2023, the Request for Proposals (RFP) was posted on the City's procurement system, Bidnet. The RFP closed on February 24, 2023. Four proposals were received from Alta Planning and Design, Inc, KUTA, DSK, and Laneshift. City staff independently evaluated and scored each proposal based on the following criteria.

Rating Scale

Evaluation Criteria

The scoring of the proposals was as follows:

Based on the evaluation scores, staff recommends the award of the Active Transportation Plan to Alta Planning and Design Inc. for $253,000.

ATTACHMENTS:

Scope of Work
Cost and Schedule
FISCAL IMPACT:

Appropriation of $284,811 from the Transportation Fund; $252,143 to be reimbursed by the Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program; and $32,668 for the required 11.47% local cash match.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. APT Cost and Schedule

2. ATP Scope of Work

Cost and Schedule Checklist
The Cost and Schedule is the official budget and timeline for the project. Tasks 1-6 outlined in the Cost and Schedule are for illustrative purposes only. The Cost and Schedule must be consistent with the Grant Application Cover Sheet. Applications with missing components will be at a competitive disadvantage.

Cost and Schedule Checklist
(ü) Ensure these items are completed prior to submitting to Caltrans Use the Fiscal Year 2022-23 template provided (do not alter the template) List all tasks with the same title as stated in the Scope of Work Include task numbers in proper sequencing, consistent with the Scope of Work Exclude sub-task numbers and sub-headings
Exclude tasks for project management and/or staff/consultant coordination; these activities should be spread among relevant tasks
Task 01 is a required task. It must be titled "Project Administration", it cannot exceed 5% of the grant amount requested, and only the grantee and recipient(s) can charge against this Task. This Task must only include the following activities and deliverables:
• Project kick-off meeting between the grantee and Caltrans at the start of the grant • Invoicing and quarterly reporting to Caltrans
• DBE Reporting (federal grants only)
Include Task 02 for procurement of consultants, if consultants are needed. This task is for the grantee and sub-recipient(s) only.

Complete all budget columns as appropriate: Total Cost, Grant Amount, Local Cash Match, and if applicable, Local In-Kind Match
Ensure the correct minimum local match amount, calculated as a percentage of the total project cost (grant plus local match), is provided
Ensure the total Local Match amount meets the minimum required Local Match for the specified Grant Category
Include a grant amount for each Task (excluding Tasks 01 and 02) Identify if a Tapered Local Match approach will be used, which allows grantees to vary the required local match ratio over the life of the grant contract. Grantee agrees to satisfy the total local match amount by the contract expiration date.

Identify the estimated indirect cost rate if indirect costs will be reimbursed. If FY 2022-23 indirect cost rates are not available, the rate will be an estimate based on the currently approved rate.

Include a best estimate of the amount of time needed to complete each task State a realistic total cost for each task based on the work that will be completed Start the timeframe at the beginning of the grant period (July 2022 for MPO/RTPAs; November 2022 for non-MPO/RTPAs)
Extend the timeframe to the end of the grant period (Project end dates differ based on applicant type (MPO/RTPA or non-MPO/RTPA) and type of funds (State or federal) (See Grant Application Guide, Chapter 8.2, for more details)

California Department of Transportation
Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant Program

COST AND SCHEDULE
Sustainable Communities Grant
2022/2023
City of Hanford Active Transportation Plan
City of Hanford
Task
# Task Title Grant Amount*
Estimated
Local Cash
Match*
Estimated
Local
In-Kind Match*
Estimated Total
Project Cost*
FY 2022/23 FY 2023/24 FY 2024/25

J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J 01 Project Administration
(no more than 5% of total grant funds) $8,500 $1,101 $0 $9,601 02 Consultant Procurement $7,200 $933 $0 $8,133
1 Project Planning & Coordination $13,750 $1,781 $0 $15,531 2 Public Outreach & Data Gathering $78,416 $10,160 $0 $88,576 3 Community Needs Assessment-User Analysis $41,530 $5,381 $0 $46,911 4 Non-Infrastructure and Programs $10,625 $1,377 $0 $12,002 5 Development and Implementation of the ATP $41,050 $5,318 $0 $46,368 6 Project Concept Plans $34,572 $4,479 $0 $39,051
7 Draft and Final Plan $16,500 $2,138 $0 $18,638
Totals $252,143 $32,668 $0 $284,811
* Use only whole dollars in the financial information fields. Dollar amounts must be rounded up/down and decimals should not be shown.

Does your agency plan to request reimburesement for indirect costs? If yes, what is the estimated indirect cost rate? ______ Does your agency plan to use the Tapered Match approach for invoicing purposes? Yes No
Yes No

UPDATED SCOPE OF WORK 6-2-22
Hanford ATP – Updated Scope of Work | 1
Scope of Work
Task 01 Project Administration
The following tasks will be performed by the City of Hanford under this task:
• Conduct Project kick-off meeting with Caltrans at the start of the grant • Invoicing and quarterly reporting to Caltrans
Task 01 Deliverables:
• Caltrans / City of Hanford Kick-off meeting (agenda, goals, agreements, and schedules) and meeting notes • Monthly invoicing to Caltrans
• Quarterly reporting to Caltrans
Task 02 Consultant Procurement
The following tasks will be performed by the City of Hanford under this task:
• Develop Request for Proposals for CONSULTANT to assist in the development of the Active Transportation Plan • Coordinate with Caltrans to develop approved RFP
• Conduct Procurement following Caltrans guidance
Task 02 Deliverables:
• Executed contract with CONSULTANT to complete Active Transportation Plan following Tasks 1 – 7 below.

Task 1 Project Planning & Coordination

KICK-OFF MEETING
The CONSULTANT team will plan and facilitate a project kick-off meeting to clarify the project scope, background, expectations, and measures of success. CONSULTANT will prepare the agenda and meeting notes. Recommended objectives for the kick-off meeting include:
• Establish communication channels and protocols
• Review project objectives
• Refine project work plan and schedule
• Identify known preliminary issues
• Develop list of background data/plans to request and review

PROJECT COORDINATION
Throughout the project, there will be ongoing coordination between the CONSULTANT team and the Hanford City Staff.

CONSULTANT Project Manager will be in regular communication with the City Project Manager – including email, phone, and written communications to keep the City apprised of progress. CONSULTANT’s overall project management services will include:
• General project management. CONSULTANT will administer the project contract, coordinate personnel, prepare and maintain the project schedule and budget, and prepare invoicing. • Quality assurance and quality control. Each of submittal will be reviewed by the Principal-in-Charge and a copy editor to see that the City quality standards are met. CONSULTANT should demonstrate that they will utilize senior level staff

UPDATED SCOPE OF WORK 6-2-22
Hanford ATP – Updated Scope of Work | 2
for all submittal reviews, and clearly communicate project requirements to the entire project team so all team members understand the project expectations.
• Project schedule. CONSULTANT shall prepare and maintain a project schedule throughout the life of the project. The schedule will be used as a tool to manage the project and updated as the specific milestones are achieved. • CONSULTANT will coordinate regular project update calls and meetings to review project status and schedule milestone updates.
• Monthly progress reports.
• Meeting notes.

Task 1 Deliverables:
• Kick-off meeting (agenda, goals, agreements, and schedules) and meeting notes • Project update calls
• Monthly progress reports
Task 2 Public Outreach & Data Gathering

PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PLAN
As the City of Hanford considers making improvements to its active transportation infrastructure, it is critical to involve citizens and stakeholders in the process. In order to encourage strong participation from the large Hispanic community, each public meeting / event must provide Spanish language accommodates and all outreach materials must be provided in English and Spanish. Early and sustained involvement helps make a successful project, but drawn out schedules can sap the interest of all but most the serious advocates. In our experience, successful engagement requires:
• Tangible projects, project concepts, and well-defined questions that can elicit meaningful input • Defined, fun exercises that engage the public about project benefits and trade-offs • Limited timeframes for participation
• Multiple methods of interaction so participants can stay for as much or little time as they like • Online engagement to reach a broader audience
CONSULTANT will develop a detailed Public Engagement Plan (PEP) that describes proposed events and identifies the schedule and key considerations for each event. This document will describe (1) the goals of the engagement effort, (2) the key audiences to reach within the City, and (3) the strategies (meetings, advertising, and other efforts), to reach these audiences. CONSULTANT will continue to update the engagement strategy as the planning process continues, updating lists of stakeholders and other participants as well as identifying additional activities as needed to support the Plan. All public input will be captured and summarized in a chapter of the Plan.

CONSULTANT will be able to provide access to digital video conferencing software that can accommodate simultaneous participants for webinars or interactive meetings, which can include polling, virtual “breakout sessions”, screen sharing, and live- chats. CONSULTANT will monitor updates on the COVID-19 restrictions and work with the City of Hanford to make any changes to the Public Engagement Plan, as appropriate.

EQUITY FRAMEWORK
CONSULTANT will develop an Equity Framework as part of the PEP which will ensure that all citizens of Hanford have the opportunity to engage meaningfully in the ATP process. The Equity Framework would be used by the City, project stakeholders, and other community-based organizations that are involved in the planning process to focus on what role active transportation facilities and programs can help, if at all, to address disparities. The Framework will help ensure that groups who frequently face greater transportation disparities and vulnerabilities (ex. people of color, women, people of no-and low-income, people with limited English proficiency, people with disabilities, children and seniors, single parents, and people who don’t own cars or do

UPDATED SCOPE OF WORK 6-2-22
Hanford ATP – Updated Scope of Work | 3
not drive) are fully considered in the evaluation of existing conditions and in recommendations. This Framework will guide the identification of community outreach events and ensure that engagement with disparate or vulnerable groups is prioritized.

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
CONSULTANT will develop, through active promotion and advertising, an ATP Technical Advisory Committee (ATP-TAC) comprised of various stakeholders and interested citizens willing to volunteer their time to provide input and oversight throughout the duration of the project. This team would serve in a volunteer capacity and meet regularly to review project updates, provide feedback, and assist the project team in meeting project goals. In order to ensure representation from a broad array of the community, the desired make-up of the ATP-TAC will include representatives from the following groups:
• Youth
• Seniors
• People with Disabilities
• Limited English Proficiency
• Low-Income populations
The ATP-TAC shall meet at least quarterly throughout the duration of the project and may meet more frequently, as needed.

CONSULTANT will work with City staff to develop a list of potential stakeholders with an interest in pedestrian and bicycle facilities within the region. These stakeholders shall include, but are not limited to City staff, police services, school district’s staff, representatives from service organizations, the Tulare/Kings Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, the local branch of the American Legion (Post 3), Self-Help Housing (benefits low-income families with limited English proficiency), disabled residents, senior citizens, businesses, neighborhood leaders, residents, local bicycle and running clubs, the Tachi Yokut Tribe, King Area Rural Transit (KART), and other interested groups. CONSULTANT will work with City staff to develop a final list of stakeholders and contact specific groups.

CONSULTANT will facilitate up to three (3) ATP-TAC meetings. These meetings may be held concurrently with other public engagement efforts. CONSULTANT will lead all logistical considerations and coordination with stakeholders. CONSULTANT will prepare meeting agendas and will document attendance and input received. The proposed meetings will include:
• Meeting 1 – Listening Session: One meeting at the onset of the project to understand local and regional issues related to bicycling and walking and help set the stage for the development of the project. • Meeting 2 – Collaboration Session: One meeting to present the summary of existing conditions and gather feedback on early findings. This meeting shall take place prior to the first community workshop. Feedback will be used in the development of materials for the first public workshop. • Meeting 3 – Presentation Session: One meeting to present the final infrastructure, policy and programmatic recommendations. This meeting shall take place prior to presenting recommendations at the second community workshop. Feedback from this meeting will be incorporated to the final recommendations to be presented at the second and last community workshop.

CONSULTANT will begin specifically promoting opportunities for citizen involvement using general promotion efforts as soon as possible. These efforts shall include, but are not limited to, public notices as follows:
• A total of ten (10), full-color flyers (8.5” x 11”) provided to the City for posting on the interior of the KART buses and local establishments
• A public notice provided to the Hanford City Clerk for posting at City Hall • A public notice advertised in the Hanford News, with an additional public notice posted two weeks later • A public notice posted to the project website which can be used throughout the duration of the project

UPDATED SCOPE OF WORK 6-2-22
Hanford ATP – Updated Scope of Work | 4

POP-UP EVENTS
CONSULTANT shall develop materials and coordinate with the City and ATP-TAC members to conduct up to eight (8) pop-up events during the duration of the project. CONSULTANT will be required to attend a total of four pop-up events with the remaining four to be conducted by City staff or ATP-TAC members. The CONSULTANT will work with the City to publicize the mobile workshops to ensure all members of the public know about the workshop and have the opportunity to attend. CONSULTANT will develop materials, maps, methods to gather input, and summary notes each event. CONSULTANT will provide materials in English and Spanish.

CONSULTANT will work with the City of Hanford to propose a substitution for any activities including pop-up engagement opportunities that may not be possible due to COVID19 related restrictions.

PROJECT WEBSITE AND ONLINE ENGAGEMENT
CONSULTANT will create a project website (in both English and Spanish) which will include a brief summary of the project, a description of the project milestones, a list of key dates, copies of documents cleared for public access that are available for download, contact information for the CONSULTANT point person, and any other materials or resources that may be beneficial to the public. CONSULTANT will regularly post project updates throughout the duration of the project.

CONSULTANT will also provide brief updates (1-2 sentences) to the City on a regular basis for the City to post to City social media (Facebook and Twitter) accounts and on the project website.

CONSULTANT will manage a survey, to be made available in English and Spanish and for both paper and online access, for gathering input on community needs/priorities and challenges in the existing pedestrian and bicycle network. Results from the survey will help inform recommendations to the active transportation network.

CONSULTANT will provide the City with an online interactive community map in order to increase the opportunities for the public to provide meaningful input and feedback. CONSULTANT will utilize online mapping for two project phases:
• Phase 1 Needs: The online map will be available for open-ended comments, feedback, and input from the public.

Members of the community may identify priority destinations for walking and biking, routes they would like to see improved, and similar information. The map will allow users to comment on input from other users, allowing for a dialogue among residents. This phase would be online through Task 3. • Phase 2 Recommendations: The online map will show the draft recommended bicycle, pedestrian, and trail networks developed by CONSULTANT as a result of community input and independent analysis. Members of the public may comment on the recommendations to indicate their approval or disapproval of the network.

PUBLIC OUTREACH SIGNAGE
CONSULTANT will develop one unique poster / yard sign which include a QR code and link to the project website for each outreach phase of the project and print 10 copies (for a total of 20). These promotional materials will help drive locals to the online survey and interactive mapping exercises. The CONSULTANT will work with City staff to place promotional materials at locations that are highly trafficked by pedestrians and bicyclists in the City of Hanford such as the intersection of W 7th Street and Douty Street, the KART transit center, Centennial Park, Freedom Park, the Hanford Sports Complex, and the Civic Center Park.

COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS
CONSULTANT will facilitate four (4) in-person community workshops during the course of the project to highlight the Plan, focused on providing the public with tangible products that require public engagement. There will be two workshops conducted during each outreach phase as described below. CONSULTANT will develop flyers, draft agenda, presentation materials, maps, methods to gather input, and summary notes for the workshop. CONSULTANT will also provide materials in English and Spanish, and will make sure Spanish-speaking staff attend the workshops. The City of Hanford will secure the meeting location and distribute noticing. Beginning thirty (30) days prior to each scheduled workshop, CONSULTANT will engage in multiple methods of outreach to promote the community workshop. CONSULTANT will engage in a concerted public outreach effort using flyers,

UPDATED SCOPE OF WORK 6-2-22
Hanford ATP – Updated Scope of Work | 5
public notices, outreach signage, the project website, and social media to advertise the event and encourage participation.

Workshops will be developed around the following project phases:
• Phase 1 - Needs Workshops (Workshops 1 & 2) – The first and second workshops will present the existing network and programs, gather feedback on network gaps and areas of concern, and review data on safety concerns, connectivity, and other factors.
• Phase 2 – Recommendations Workshops (Workshops 3 & 4) – The third and fourth community workshops will be used to review the draft policy and infrastructure recommendations, and solicit feedback from the community.

CONSULTANT will demonstrate availability and familiarity with a secondary fully virtual option to Community Workshops as a contingency option for COVID related restrictions.

COMMUNITY WALKING AUDIT
The CONSULTANT will work with the City and ATP-TAC to conduct one walking / bicycling audit within the City and invite community members and the ATP-TAC to participate. The goal of the audit will be to highlight barriers and concerns of residents and to assess existing conditions related to active transportation. The CONSULTANT will oversee coordination and promotion of the audit while managing audit logistics such as scheduling with community partners, route planning, developing of printed materials like route maps or checklists, and providing a summary of findings.

COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT SUMMARY
At the conclusion of the public involvement portion of the project, CONSULTANT will provide a summary of public engagement with special emphasis on accomplishments with key stakeholders including the school district and underserved portions of the community.

Task 2 Deliverables:
• Final Public Engagement Plan describing goals of the outreach and proposed events • A total of ten (10), full-color flyers (8.5” x 11”) provided to the City for posting on the interior of the Start buses and local bicycle establishments
• A total of twenty (20) yard sign / poster sized promotional signs for posting at highly visible and highly trafficked pedestrian areas
• A public notice provided to the Hanford City Clerk for posting at City Hall • A public notice advertised in the Hanford News, with an additional public notice posted two weeks later • A public notice posted to an CONSULTANT-created project website which can be used throughout the duration of the project
• Up to three (3) Technical Advisory Team meetings and meeting materials • Two (2) community workshops and public notice of workshops (materials in English and Spanish with bilingual interpretation available)
• Project website with monthly updates
• Nine (9) social media posts for City to distribute
• Interactive online survey and map (English and Spanish) • Up to four (2) pop-up events (materials in English and Spanish with bilingual interpretation available) • Public engagement summary
Task 3 Community Needs Assessment-User Analysis
Through this task, the CONSULTANT will focus on understanding where the biggest needs and the biggest opportunities may be for providing more comfortable and connected bicycle and pedestrian networks. More specifically, CONSULTANT staff will focus on the following sub tasks:

UPDATED SCOPE OF WORK 6-2-22
Hanford ATP – Updated Scope of Work | 6

PLAN REVIEW
CONSULTANT will review relevant plans, policies, and reports that pertain to active transportation in the City to allow for consistency. At the onset of the project, CONSULTANT will work with the City to finalize a list of plans/ documents / policies to be reviewed. CONSULTANT will submit a data request memo to City staff, to request all available plans, policies, and regulations which may have any effect on the development of the plan and recommendations. Following the review of the documents, CONSULTANT staff will develop a summary of plans and how they pertain to the development and implementation of bicycle and pedestrian recommendations in the Plan. The CONSULTANT will consider the potential for displacement of existing community members resulting from recommended projects and provide

VISION, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES
Based on review of existing plans and input from City staff, CONSULTANT will develop a vision statement for the draft plan. The vision will be a broad and inspirational statement that presents the desired impact on pedestrian and bicycle travel in the future.

Goals, policies, and action statements will be developed to support the vision statement. CONSULTANT will develop a memo that will be the foundation of this section of the plan. CONSULTANT will revise the memo based on one set of internally consistent client comments and include final changes in the Draft Active Transportation Plan.

EXISTING CONDITIONS AND BASE MAPS
CONSULTANT will work with the City to compile and organize available information on existing conditions for the project area such as demographics, traffic volumes, state route planning and construction plans, aerial and base maps, and existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities. CONSULTANT will then prepare a series of base maps for design and analysis work that can be easily understood by the public for use at meetings and the public events. Data will also be collected using available data and verified with desktop review and strategic field visits. CONSULTANT will share the final map (with all GIS shape files) with the City.

GAP ANALYSIS
CONSULTANT will conduct a detailed assessment of gaps and needs of on- and off-street bicycle facilities, and pedestrian facilities.

This assessment will quantify factors that impact walking and bicycling activity, locate network gaps as potential projects, and identify key pedestrian and bicycling areas based on demand and supply variables. Analysis under this task shall include:
• Demand Analysis (Land Use Analysis). CONSULTANT will use data about existing and proposed land use, trips, and others to identify where there is high demand for biking and walking in Hanford. This will consider access to transit, schools, work, commercial destinations, trail heads, and others. CONSULTANT will coordinate with City Planning Department to consider future land uses surrounding the Kings/Tulare HSR Station and their impacts on future biking and walking demand. CONSULTANT will provide memo summarizing results of up to four analyzed land use scenarios. • Safety Analysis (Collision Analysis): CONSULTANT will conduct an analysis of safety issues in Hanford. CONSULTANT will use the latest five years of vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian collisions using the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) to develop maps that illustrate bicycle and pedestrian collision locations based on severity. High injury corridors and intersections will be identified for special consideration in the recommendations section of the plan update. CONSULTANT will work with the city to perform high level audits to identify safety concerns at high-collision locations. • Modeshare Analysis: CONSULTANT will work with the City to understand the estimated number of existing bicycle trips and pedestrian trips in the plan area, both in absolute numbers and as a percentage of all trips, and the estimated increase in the number of bicycle trips and pedestrian trips resulting from implementation of the plan. CONSULTANT will use data about existing multimodal infrastructure to develop an understanding of how well destinations and areas of demand are connected for people who want to walk and bike for both transportation and recreation. It will also consider how Hanford’s bicycle, pedestrian, and trail networks connect to the City’s neighbors. • Equity Analysis: CONSULTANT will map demographic information city-wide to understand specific conditions related to low income, minority households, and households without access to a motor vehicle in the study area. This information can be used to identify programmatic strategies to support students, families, and schools with limited capacity and resources, and in the project prioritization phase to focus resources in areas that have been traditionally less well- served by city infrastructure. As part of this analysis, the CONSULTANT will consider the potential for displacement

UPDATED SCOPE OF WORK 6-2-22
Hanford ATP – Updated Scope of Work | 7
caused by recommended projects due to cost-of-living increases and provide policy considerations for the City to proactively address potential issues. This will include a review of industry best practices on displacement mitigation from across the United States.
• Level of Traffic Stress Analysis: CONSULTANT will assess the Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) on the existing bikeway facilities using available data including number of vehicle travel lanes, existing bicycle facilities, and intersection controls. Gaps in the network will be identified in terms of user comfort, identifying where a segment drops below the desired level of traffic stress and implications for ridership. This task will look at:
o Accessibility of regional destinations
o Potential new facility requirements (in excess of existing and planned facilities) o Existing barriers to bicycle access
CONSULTANT will use these analyses to identify:
• New trail opportunities along creeks/water features, other infrastructure right-of-ways, or adjacent to public street right-of-ways;
• Gaps in existing bicycle networks, intersection crossing needs, and other conflict points, • Gaps in pedestrian networks, such as sidewalk gaps, crossing needs in areas of pedestrian activities or at crossings of streets and other public right-of-ways;
• Priorities in route choice and how specific project improvements improve overall bicycle mobility based on specific user groups and their preferences;
• Potential enhancements to existing trails and bicycle and pedestrian facilities to meet design and/or Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards, and
• Needs for supporting bicycle facilities, such as bicycle parking, repair stations and other CONSULTANT will produce a series of maps, tables, and narrative that describe gaps and needs, developing a chapter for the plan that synthesize this information into critical needs and gaps that can be addressed by the City. CONSULTANT will also produce a map specifically identifying opportunities for and barriers to walking and bicycling around schools in the Hanford Elementary School District.

CONSULTANT will develop an Existing Conditions Memo that includes deliverables from Task 3.

Task 3 Deliverables:
• Map identifying opportunities and barriers around schools in the HESD • Vision, goals, and objectives
• Base map files (GIS format and with all shape files)
• Existing Conditions Memo
Task 4 Non-Infrastructure and Programs

POLICIES AND PROGRAMS REVIEW
CONSULTANT team will catalog any additional policies and programs that the City and non-profit partners conduct to promote pedestrian and bicycle safety. CONSULTANT will categorize programs into the following program areas:
• Education
• Encouragement
• Enforcement
• Evaluation

UPDATED SCOPE OF WORK 6-2-22
Hanford ATP – Updated Scope of Work | 8

NON-INFRASTRUCTURE RECOMMENDATIONS
CONSULTANT will develop specific program recommendations in coordination with implementing agencies. CONSULTANT will develop a pedestrian and bicycle programs memo that will be the foundation of the update to the plan for this section.

CONSULTANT will revise the memo based on one set of internally consistent client comments.

Task 4 Deliverables:
• Summary of existing policies and programs
• Pedestrian and bicycle programs memo
Task 5 Development and Implementation of the ATP
This task will provide Hanford with a list of projects, a method to prioritize projects, and identification of funding sources to support future projects. The outcome will be a plan with prioritized locations and specific improvements for streets, sidewalks, and intersections that support all users.

DESIGN GUIDELINES
CONSULTANT will develop design guidelines to reflect changes in best practices and in coordination with the City’s policies.

CONSULTANT will consult the FHWA Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks Guide (STAR) as well as Caltrans Highway Design Manuals and Design Information Bulletins, and 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design. The design guidelines will be a stand- alone document. CONSULTANT will develop and revise the design guidelines based on one set of internally consistent client comments. Design guidelines will include the following:
• Bikeway, trail, and sidewalk recommended widths
• Bikeway and trail intersection guidance
• Bicycle detection recommendations
• Striping and signing recommendations
• Bicycle parking recommendations by land use type
• Pedestrian improvement standards, accessibility issues, and crosswalk Prioritization Policy • Traffic calming and control devices for universal access CONSULTANT will develop a set of design guidelines tailored to the unique context of the City of Hanford, using images and information on local infrastructure that provides the City with a resource to implement ongoing bicycle and pedestrian design solutions as part of project opportunities that arise from other projects such as new development or regular street resurfacing.

BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN NETWORK RECOMMENDATIONS
CONSULTANT will develop pedestrian and bicycle network recommendations. The networks will be developed with a variety of users in mind (school children, commuters, elderly and disabled adults, and recreational users), and enhance local non-motorized connections. The CONSULTANT team will prepare maps depicting existing, funded, and proposed bicycle and pedestrian projects.

We will also produce a project list. Each listed project will include the project name, proposed facility type, segment endpoints and segment length. Recommendations will be categorized by facility type and may include:
• Local and regional bikeways (e.g., Class I/II/III/IV facilities) • Pedestrian spot improvements (e.g., sidewalk infill, crossing enhancements) • Support facilities (e.g., short- and long-term bike parking and trailheads) • Future studies (e.g., trail feasibility studies, bike share feasibility studies, signal timing enhancements, and other improvements requiring further analysis)

ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST ESTIMATES
Based on the draft network recommendations, CONSULTANT will develop planning-level order of magnitude cost ranges for the bicycle and pedestrian network improvements. Order of magnitude cost estimates will include a range of cost to provide decision

UPDATED SCOPE OF WORK 6-2-22
Hanford ATP – Updated Scope of Work | 9
makers and the public with an indication of the potential order of magnitude of costs when considering recommendations. Orders of magnitude will be based on the latest unit costs used in Hanford and nearby communities.

PROJECT PRIORITIZATION
CONSULTANT will develop a Project Prioritization matrix that will allow the city to rank the proposed projects. CONSULTANT will develop an initial set of evaluation criteria to be reviewed by the City and ATP-TAC. The evaluation criteria will be used to measure the relative importance of each recommended bicycle and pedestrian improvement. Project evaluation criteria may include:
• Public Support
• Safety
• Connectivity
• Transit Support
• Quality
• Feasibility
The City and the ATP-TAC will provide the final criteria and evaluation method for the CONSULTANT to apply to the proposed projects. As part of this task and using the cost ranges developed during Task 5, CONSULTANT will also identify projects that will require additional review and studies (ex. feasibility, traffic study, ROW needs, etc.). This will help the City identify both priorities and appropriate methods for implementation, including relevant funding sources. The implementation strategy will include general development guidelines for conditioning future development to implement projects identified in this Plan as the opportunity arises.

FUNDING ANALYSIS AND NEEDS
As part of this task, CONSULTANT will provide an implementation strategy that identifies potential funding opportunities – including local, regional, and statewide funding – and applies them to each project. CONSULTANT will compile existing conditions data to help meet the grant application requirements of various federal and state grant programs regularly used to fund non- motorized improvement projects, as identified in the funding portion of the AT Plan, to include, but not limited to, the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), Active Transportation Program (ATP), and Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) grant program.

CONSULTANT will create a funding opportunity matrix to match project recommendations with eligible funding sources.

Task 5 Deliverables:
• Citywide design guidelines for the development of active transportation facilities • Proposed bicycle and pedestrian network improvements
• Planning level cost estimates for proposed active transportation improvements • Prioritized project list, including maps and tables that capture the top feasible priorities for the City • Project recommendations and implementation memo
Task 6 Project Concept Plans
CONSULTANT will develop concept plans of the top three (3) priority projects derived from the funding and needs analysis. These will be suitable for the City to apply for grant funding for implementation and include the following signing, striping and other improvements that can be used to develop preliminary planning-level cost estimates and inform a future detailed design phase.

Any changes to the curb/gutter and sidewalks or other work changing the vertical alignment of the area will not include consideration of drainage improvements. New curb or upgraded curb ramp locations will be noted in the concept plans and included cost estimates, but not designed. The CONSULTANT will develop one administrative draft per concept for the City to review and provide one round of comments.

CONSULTANT will revise each concept plan based on one set of internally consistent client comments.

UPDATED SCOPE OF WORK 6-2-22
Hanford ATP – Updated Scope of Work | 10
Task 6 Deliverables:
• Concept plans for three (3) priority projects
Task 7 Draft and Final Plan

PREPARE ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT PLAN
CONSULTANT will prepare and circulate an administrative draft plan for review by City staff and members of the advisory group.

The Plan will be comprised of content drafted and approved in the working memos from previous tasks, including conceptual designs, recommendations and standards for improved road safety and operations, pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities, and enhanced streetscapes. It will identify a network of routes that can be retrofitted in stages over time as part of the City capital improvement program, or as grants, and other funding sources are attained. The document will also contain a record of the outreach process, proposed timing, and prioritization for implementation of the recommendations, and potential funding sources and strategies. City staff will compile and organize comments for response and provide direction for the first round of revisions.

PREPARE PUBLIC REVIEW OF DRAFT PLAN
CONSULTANT will revise the administrative draft based on one set of internally consistent City comments and produce the public draft of the Hanford Active Transportation Plan. The DRAFT plan will be posted on the project website for public comment for a period of one (1) month.

CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION
CONSULTANT will revise the public draft based on public feedback on the DRAFT plan and guidance from City staff and prepare the final draft of the Hanford Active Transportation Plan. CONSULTANT will present the final draft to the Hanford City Council for approval and adoption.

FINAL DRAFT AND PLAN SUBMISSION
CONSULTANT will finalize the document and transmit electronic source files. CONSULTANT will print and ship up to three (3) hard copies of the final plan to the City, and will deliver one (1) electronic copy to the City.

Task 7 Deliverables:
• Administrative draft plan
• Public draft plan
• Presentation of the final draft to City Council for approval and adoption • Final draft (including electronic source files and one electronic copy) • Print and ship up to three (3) hardcopies of the final draft

12.G.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 4/4/2023 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Acceptance of Grant of Easement for property from Forebay Farms, LLC for right of way purposes for the installation of a traffic signal system at the intersection of 12th Avenue and Hume Avenue.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: That the City Council, by motion, accept the attached grant of easement from Forebay Farms, LLC for right of way purposes for the installation of a traffic signal system at the intersection of 12th Avenue and Hume Avenue.

BACKGROUND:

This project will consist of the installation of a traffic signal system at the intersection of 12th Avenue and Hume Avenue, per the layout below and in the attached document:

The current traffic control at this intersection is a two-way stop. With increasing development in the

area, the traffic counts will increase and calculations indicate that traffic signal warrants will be met before construction begins. The project will increase traffic flow efficiency and reduce intersection congestion by allowing more free flow traffic movements through the intersection. The project will also provide air quality benefits by reducing vehicle idling times. Development in this area of our community is increasing, placing additional demands on our transportation system.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The Grant of Easement for right of way purposes for the installation of a traffic signal system from Forebay Farms, LLC to the City is being made at no cost.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Grant of Easement, Forebay Farms, LLC to City of Hanford, Hume Ave. & 12th Ave., T902 Live Oak North, Signed 2-27-23

12.H.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 4/4/2023 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Authorization to advertise for bids the FY 23 Pavement Resurfacing Treatment Project and the concurrent Manhole Project: Raise and Adjust to Grade, and Pre-Authorize the City Manager to award and execute the contracts on behalf of the City to the lowest responsible bidders; providing the project bid is within current budget appropriation.

Recommendation:

Recommendation: Authorization to advertise for bids the FY 23 Pavement Resurfacing Treatment project and the concurrent Manhole Project: Raise and Adjust to Grade, and Pre-Authorize the City Manager to award and execute the contracts on behalf of the City to the lowest responsible bidders providing the project bid is within current budget appropriation.

Background:

Pavement resurfacing treatment is a surface protection and pavement preservation treatment for city streets. The location of streets and the types of treatment processes will be determined by Public Works Department staff and is dependent on pavement conditions. Treatments may include slurry seal, cape seal or fiber seal coatings or other pavement preservation treatments needed to extend the useful life of roadways. See attached location maps for specific streets.

Asphalt concrete pavement surfaces deteriorate over time due to loss of oil content from naturally occurring processes and vehicular traffic loads. Pavement resurfacing treatments will extend the useful life of asphalt concrete pavement surfaces, thereby reducing street maintenance costs. This project will provide surface treatment for approximately 1.85 miles of roadway (32,372.89SY).

In conjunction with the pavement resurfacing project, we will be raising and adjusting manholes. The thickness of the product sealant will leave some manholes and gate valve covers located in travel lanes low, resulting in a rougher ride than normal. The staff recognizes the importance of this project.

This project will raise these facility covers to the finished pavement grade, thereby eliminating bumps in the roadway.

After bid opening, staff will examine the bids, validate the lowest bidder's contractor's license status, and verify the contractor is in good standing. Staff is requesting the pre-authorization to award and execute the contract in order to expedite the process of delivery of projects to avoid winterization.

With Council approval, staff will solicit bids for this project. If awarded, construction is anticipated to begin in Summer 2023.

Fiscal Impact:

The FY 23 Capital Improvement budget provides $843,202.00 for construction, including contingencies for both projects. A copy of the Budget Page is attached for Council review.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. FY 23 Budget Page

2. FY23 Double Fiber Location Maps

822615
823618
Project Background:

Existing Conditions:

Project Justification:

Fiscal Implications:

Project Budget Summary:
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Program or Project Construction Construction Construction Construction Construction Engineering / Inspection 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 Construction 850,000 850,000 850,000 850,000 850,000
Contingency 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000
Department Overhead 49,850 36,690 3,000 3,000 3,000
Total Expenditure $996,850 $983,690 $950,000 $950,000 $950,000 Funding
0040 Gas Tax 367,261 362,412 350,000 350,000 350,000
0050 Gas Tax (TDA Transportation) 629,589 621,278 600,000 600,000 600,000 0045 Gas Tax (RMRA)

Total Funding $996,850 $983,690 $950,000 $950,000 $950,000 Pavement Resurfacing Treatment
Pavement resurfacing treatment is a surface protection and pavement preservation treatment for city streets. The location of streets and the types of treatment processes will be determined by Public Works Department staff and is dependent on pavement conditions. Treatments may include slurry seal, cape seal or fiber seal coatings or other pavement preservation treatments needed to extend the useful life of roadways.

Asphalt concrete pavement surfaces deteriorate over time due to loss of oil content from naturally occurring processes and vehicular traffic loads.

Pavement resurfacing treatments will extend the useful life of asphalt concrete pavement surfaces, thereby reducing street maintenance costs. This project will provide surface treatment for approximately seven miles of roadways (207,300 SY).

ExpenditureRevenue
Funding for this project will be allocated from Gas Tax Reserves. 5-Year Funding Allocation

12.I.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 4/4/2023 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Authorization to advertise for bids for the FY 23 Manhole Repair and Coating Project, and Pre- Authorize the City Manager to award and execute the contract on behalf of the City to the lowest responsible bidder; providing the project bid is within current budget appropriation.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation:That the City Council, by motion, authorize staff to advertise for bids for the FY 23 Manhole Repair and Coating Project, and Pre-Authorize the City Manager to award and execute the contract on behalf of the City to the lowest responsible bidder providing the project bid is within current budget appropriation.

BACKGROUND:

This project consists of repairing channels, grouting walls, and installing an epoxy coating system on existing sanitary sewer manholes that are in need of repairs. See attached location maps for specific locations.

After bid opening, staff will examine the bids, validate the lowest bidder's contractor's license status, and verify the contractor is in good standing. Staff is requesting the pre-authorization to award and execute the contract in order to expedite the process of delivery of projects to avoid winterization.

With Council approval, staff will solicit bids for this project. If awarded, construction is anticipated to begin in Summer 2023.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The FY 23 Capital Improvement budget provides $104,720.00 for construction, including contingencies. A copy of the Budget Page is attached for Council review.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. FY 23 Budget Page - Manhole Repiar

2. FY 23 Manhole Loactions

823629
Project Background:

Existing Conditions:

Project Justification:

Fiscal Implications:

Project Budget Summary:
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Program or Project Construction Construction
Engineering / Inspection 5,000 5,000
Construction 82,000 82,000
Contingency 8,000 8,000
Department Overhead 3,680 8,558
Total Expenditure $0 $98,680 $0 $103,558 $0
Funding
0362 Wastewater Capital 98,680 103,558

Total Funding $0 $98,680 $0 $103,558 $0
ExpenditureRevenue
Manhole Repair and Coating Project
This project provides for repair and coating of damaged sanitary sewer manholes and lift stations where corrosion is affecting concrete surfaces.

In order to limit damage to sewer facilities from corrosion, this project provides for repairing and coating the facilities.

Funding for the Manhole Repair and Coating Project will be allocated from Wastewater Capital Reserves. 5-Year Funding Allocation

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 11940 10 1/2 Ave. (1st Manhole N. of Houston
11818 10 1/2 Ave.
11720 10 1/2 Ave.
11646 10 1/2 Ave.
11548 10 1/2 Ave
11460 10 1/2 Ave.
11280 10 1/2 Ave. (Manhole N. of Property
11280 10 1/2 AVE. (Manhole S. of Property)
Cameron St. & Middleton St.

Gilkey Ln. & Hanford-Armona
Rosewood & Grangeville

MANHOLE REPAIRS NEEDED

LOCATION OF MANHOLES
)

12.J.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 4/4/2023 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Authorization to award a contract to Lechowicz & Tsenh (L&T), at a cost of $96,420, for the purpose of performing a Utility Rate Study, pursuant to the scope of work identified in RFP 2023-02. The cost of the study will be split evenly between the Water, Wastewater, and Stormwater enterprise funds.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation:That the City Council, by motion, award a contract for a Utility rate study to Lechowicz & Tsenh (L&T) at a cost of $96,420.

Recommended Motion: I move to award the contract for the utility rate study, to Lechowicz&Tsenh (L&T) at a cost of $96,420.

BACKGROUND:

The most recent wastewater and stormwater rate adjustment was implemented in 2009. The last water rate study was done in 2015. Since that time, costs in the various utilities have increased significantly and available funds in these utilities are no longer sufficient to support operations and future capital costs. A rate study will evaluate the proper cost for the services and will recommend rates for various types of services (commercial, residential, and industrial). Once the evaluation is complete, the results will be brought to the City Council for consideration and consideration of a Proposition 218 ballot issuance. If approved to ballot by Council, residents will have the opportunity to accept or reject the proposed rates.

Three proposals were received in response to the RFP. The proposals were scored by a rating committee.

Lechowicz and Tsenh 279
QK 258
IGS 249

It should be noted that each of the scorers rated the three proposals in the same order.

FISCAL IMPACT:

All costs associated with the rate study will be borne by the enterprise funds and will have no impact on the general fund.

ATTACHMENTS:

None

12.K.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 4/4/2023 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Authorization enter into a five year, sole source contract with Univar for the supply and delivery of sodium hypochlorite to be used as a disinfecting agent in the City's water system. As part of the contract, Univar will supply four 750 gallon tanks at no charge to City, which will facilitate more efficient deliveries.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation:That Council. by Motion, authorize a five year sole source contract with Unival for the supply of sodium hypochlorite for disinfection of the City's water system.

Recommended Motion:I move to award a five year contract to Univar for the supply of Sodium hypochlorite for disinfection of the City;s water supply system.

BACKGROUND:

For many years, City has purchased sodium hypochlorite from Univar. While there are a few other suppliers of the chemical, each of those suppliers purchases from Univar and marks up the cost of the product. Univar is by far the least expensive source of sodium hypochlorite. As part of this five year contract, Univar will replace the City's current 400 gallon tanks with 750 gallon tanks at no charge to City. The larger tank size will facilitate a more efficient delivery of chemicals . We will no longer be charged for delivery of "short loads" nor will we require as frequent of deliveries, further reducing the cost.

The contract cost of the sodium chlorite is $2.83 per gallon, with an expected volume of 10,000 gallons per year.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Cost of the contract will be paid through the Water enterprise fund and have no impact to the general fund.

ATTACHMENTS:

None

12.L.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 4/4/2023 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Approval of the Notice of Completion for Tract No. 865 Live Oak East Unit No. 1, Located at Houston Avenue and Alpine Avenue, and Authorization for the Mayor to Execute and the City Clerk to attest and file said Notice with the Kings County Recorder's office.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council, by motion, approve a Notice of Completion for Tract No. 865-1 Live Oak East Unit No. 1 and authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest and file said Notice with the Kings County Recorder’s Office.

BACKGROUND:

On August 3rd, 2021 the Council approved the subdivision agreement and final map for Tract No. 865-1 Live Oak East Unit No. 1, a 100-lot residential subdivision located as shown on the attached map. The developer of the subdivision is San Joaquin Valley Homes, Presidio JJR Sterling Oaks 104, LLC and Presidio JJR Hidden Oaks 104, LLC a Delaware Limited Liability Company. The developer has completed all public improvements for the subdivision and posted a 10 percent warranty security, which shall remain in effect for a minimum of one year after the attached Notice of Completion is recorded.

The Developer has provided a bond from Markel Insurance Company, bond #4448048 in the amount of $160,160.00 for street light replacement throughout Tract 865 Unit 1, to replace streetlights with the approved model.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The public improvements have been constructed by the developer as required by the subdivision conditions of approval, and no fiscal impact to the budget will result from approval of the Notice of Completion.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. 865-1 NOC

2. TR 865-1-Recorded Final Map

3. Tract 865-1 Street Light Bond Letter