Hanford City Council
October 3, 2023

City Council Meeting
Agenda
October 3, 2023
7:00 PM – Regular Meeting
Council Chambers
400 N. Douty St.

Council Members will meet in-person in the Council
Chambers. The meeting will also be lived streamed on the City’s website: http://livestream.hanford.city/

5:00 PM CALL TO ORDER STUDY SESSION:

ROLL CALL BY THE CITY CLERK:

PUBLIC COMMENT:

Study Sessions are considered Special Meetings under the Brown Act. Accordingly, comments from the public are limited to items listed on the agenda (GC 54954.3a). Public Comment will be accepted during each agenda item. A maximum of three minutes is allowed for each speaker. Please begin your comments by stating your name and providing your city of residence.

STUDY SESSION:

A. Council review and direction to staff on the proposed goals and policies for Community Facilities Districts for all future subdivisions and authorization for Staff to engage a consultant to establish a program to finance improvements via Community Facilities Districts.

CALL TO ORDER REGULAR SESSION:

ROLL CALL:

INVOCATION:

FLAG SALUTE:

COUNCIL REPORTS/GENERAL REPORTS:

Brief information-only reports from City Council and/or Staff, including committee reports and reports by City Council related to meetings attended at City expenses (AB1234).

PUBLIC COMMENT:

This is the time for citizens to comment on subject matters within the jurisdiction of the Hanford City Council. This is also

the public’s opportunity to request an item from the Consent Calendar be pulled for discussion purposes or to comment on any item on the agenda. State law does not allow the Council to discuss or take action on issues not on the agenda, except that members of the Council or staff may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons exercising their public testimony rights (Gov. Code sec. 54954.2). A maximum of three minutes is allowed for each speaker. Please begin your comments by stating your name and providing your city of residence.

CONSENT CALENDAR:

Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these matters unless a request is made and then the item will be removed from the Consent Calendar to be discussed and voted upon by a separate motion.

A. Procedural Waiver: Waive reading in full of resolutions and ordinances and approval and adoption of same by reading title the only.

B. City Clerk: Approval of the Minutes of the September 19, 2023 Meeting C. Administration: Approval of an In-Kind contract with the Hanford Chamber of Commerce, consistent with the recommendation of the Council Ad-Hoc subcommittee, that memorializes the services to be offered in exchange for office space in the Courthouse.

D. Administration: Approval of a Facility Lease Agreement with MSI, Inc. for the City property located at 426 W. Lacey Blvd, more commonly referred to as the Former Goodwill building, for an initial rent of $3,600 per month increasing by 5% annually.

E. Community Development: Authorization for the City Manager to execute documents and enter into a contract with Caltrans for the Kings-Tulare High-Speed Rail Station Transit- Oriented Development and Connectivity Plan and Cross Valley Corridor Rail Service Planning project to be funded through a $650,000 Sustainable Communities grant.

PUBLIC HEARING:

A. Community Development: Annexation 162: A request to annex 12.17 acres into the City of Hanford from the Kings County jurisdiction and cancel the Williamson Act Contract for the property. Prezone No. 0001-23: A request to prezone the land proposed to be annexed as R-L-5 Low-Density Residential, in accordance with the General Plan designation for the territory, Low-Density Residential. Tentative Tract 940 (Stonehaven):

A request, by D.R. Horton, to subdivide the 12.17 acres proposed to be prezoned R-L-5 Low-Density Residential into 82 single-family residential lots. Planned Unit Development No. 13-23: A request to deviate from the standards of the Hanford Municipal Code, in order to utilize the small lot provisions of Section 17.10.100 to allow:

1. Reduced lot sizes between 3,600 – 4,999 square feet

2. Reduced lot widths

3. Reduced lot depths

4. Reduced setbacks

5. Exception: No limitation on the width of the garage (standard regulation limits garage width to no more than 50% of the residence’s frontage) The Project is located south of Hanford Armona Road, between 12th and 13th Avenues (APN011-040-030) GENERAL BUSINESS:

A. Community Development: Approval of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Hanford and Kings County, pertaining to the annexation of the remaining "substantially surrounded islands" within the City of Hanford.

B. Parks and Community Services: Presentation regarding the Council-supported formation of the Field Sports Advisory Committee and Approval of the Field Permitting Process and Adoption of the City of Hanford Athletic Field Use Policy and associated permit fees.

COUNCIL COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS:

At this time, any Council Member may ask a question for clarification, make an announcement, or report briefly on their activities. In addition, subject to Council Policies and Procedures, they may request staff to report back to the Council at a subsequent meeting concerning any matter or take action to direct staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. (GOV. CODE SEC. 54954.2)
A. Council Future Agenda Items
B. Upcoming Events and Important Dates:

October 3: HPD 2023 National Night Out 6:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m. in Civic Park October 7&8: Renaissance Fair 10:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. in Civic Park October 14: Oktoberfest 5:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. in Civic Park-Benefit For the Hanford Police K9 Foundation: Get tickets here
October 17: Regular City Council Meeting
ADJOURNMENT:

Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available to public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office located at 319 N. Douty Street, Hanford, California 93230, during normal business hours. Such agendas are also available at the city’s website, www.cityofhanfordca.com subject to staff’s ability to post the agenda before the meeting.

If you need a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s office, 559-585-2515, 319 N. Douty Street, Hanford, California 93230, at least 2 days prior to the meeting {28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II}

4.A.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 10/3/2023 AGENDA SECTION: STUDY SESSION

SUBJECT:

Council review and direction to staff on the proposed goals and policies for Community Facilities Districts for all future subdivisions and authorization for Staff to engage a consultant to establish a program to finance improvements via Community Facilities Districts.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: Review and provide input on goals and policies for Community Facilities Districts for all future subdivisions and authorize Staff to engage a consultant to evaluate the feasibility of improvement financing and, if feasible, create a program to finance improvements via Community Facilities Districts BACKGROUND:

City Council requested that staff further evaluate the types of services that Community Facilities Districts (CFDs) may provide with respect to future subdivisions. The establishment of CFDs in the City would allow the City to recoup costs associated with maintaining infrastructure and facilities serving new subdivisions. Establishing CFDs enables the City to levy a special tax to cover the cost of such services. The special taxes are levied within a CFD’s boundary, not throughout the entire city, which leads to new development “paying its own way”.

CFD taxes can also be levied to fund the construction of improvements required to support the development of new homes.

CFDs may be used to maintain and/or construct park facilities, water facilities, sewer facilities, storm drain facilities, police and fire facilities and services, streets and lighting, and other city services and infrastructure.

If the City moves forward with establishing CFDs for future subdivisions, the following items must first be completed:

1. Approve a CFD goals and policies resolution that identifies the types of services and improvements to be provided by CFDs.

2. Identify types of improvements that would be financed by CFDs and engage a consultant to assist the City in evaluating feasibility, and, if feasible, creating a unified program that would outline how City CFDs would finance those projects.

City Staff is seeking input on the scope of potential improvements to include in the CFD goals and policies and is seeking authorization to work with a consultant to evaluate the feasibility of financing such improvements and establishing a financing program that utilizes CFDs.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Potential costs associated with working with a consultant to establish a CFD program.

ATTACHMENTS:

None

11.B.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 10/3/2023 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Approval of the Minutes of the September 19, 2023 Meeting

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: Motion to approve the minutes from the September 19, 2023 meeting.

BACKGROUND:

FISCAL IMPACT:

ATTACHMENTS:

1. 9-18-2023

City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes
September 19, 2023 7:00 PM
Council Chambers
400 N. Douty St.

4:00 PM CALL TO ORDER STUDY SESSION AND CLOSED SESSION:

Mayor Paden called the study session and closed session to order at 4:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL BY THE CITY CLERK:

Present: Absent:

Council Member Lou Martinez
Council Member Travis Paden
Council Member Mark Kairis
Council Member Kalish Morrow
Council Member Diane Sharp
PUBLIC COMMENT:

Study Sessions are considered Special Meetings under the Brown Act. Accordingly, comments from the public are limited to items listed on the agenda (GC 54954.3a). Public Comment will be accepted during each agenda item. A maximum of three minutes is allowed for each speaker. Please begin your comments by stating your name and providing your city of residence.

Judy Scott spoke in support of the project and the grant that was presented by Deputy City Manager Jason Waters.

STUDY SESSION:

A. Presentation from Lechowicz & Tseng Municipal Consultants on progress of a Rate Study for water, wastewater and storm drain rates and Council direction to staff and consultants to assist with the completion of the Study.

Lechowicz & Tseng Municipal Consultants Project Manager Alison Lechowicz presented the Utilities Rate Study and their proposal for the Council's review and direction. The Council and the City Attorney questioned the proposed tier system. The City Attorney shared his experience with Prop 218 litigation. He also expressed concerns about the consumption rates, and the tier system. Ms. Lechowicz addressed Mr. Mizote's questions and concerns. The Council discussed the Rate Study schedule and the public hearing date. Staff answered questions from the Council. The final recommendations will be presented to the Council on October 17, 2023.

B. Preview of the Active Transportation Plan, including the scope of work, timeline, community outreach, and it’s relationship with the Reconnecting Communities Program Alta Transportation Planning Associate Ryan Johnson discussed the Active Transportation Plan. He also discussed the

next phase after he receives the community's input. Parks and Community Services Director Brad Albert discussed the health and wellness benefits. Deputy City Manager Jason Waters presented the Neighborhood Access and Equity (NAE) Grant Program, and the People's Bridge Project. The grant application deadline is September 28th. Staff answered questions from the Council. The Council spoke in support of the grant application.

The Mayor adjourned the study session at 5:45 p.m.

CLOSED SESSION FOR DISCUSSION OF THE FOLLOWING:

A. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT (GC 54957)
TITLE: Police Chief
CALL TO ORDER REGULAR SESSION:

Mayor Paden called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL:

Present: Absent:

Council Member Lou Martinez
Council Member Travis Paden
Council Member Mark Kairis
Council Member Kalish Morrow
Council Member Diane Sharp
INVOCATION:

The invocation was led by Pastor Albert Toralez.

FLAG SALUTE:

The flag salute was led by Vice Mayor Kairis.

CLOSED SESSION ACTION REPORT:

None.

RECOGNITION:

Oath of office and Badge Pinning Ceremony for Officer Robert Leist, Officer Michael Crawmer, Officer Dario Salazar, Officer Cyrena Lopez, and Officer Evan Gonzales
Chief Sever introduced each of the new officers and the City Clerk, Natalie Corral administered the oath.

COUNCIL REPORTS/GENERAL REPORTS:

Brief information-only reports from City Council and/or Staff, including committee reports and reports by City Council related to meetings attended at City expenses (AB1234).

The Council discussed the meetings and events they attended.

PUBLIC COMMENT:

This is the time for citizens to comment on subject matters within the jurisdiction of the Hanford City Council. This is also the public’s opportunity to request an item from the Consent Calendar be pulled for discussion purposes or to comment on any item on the agenda. State law does not allow the Council to discuss or take action on issues not on the agenda, except that members of the Council or staff may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons exercising their public testimony rights (Gov. Code sec. 54954.2). A maximum of three minutes is allowed for each speaker. Please begin your comments by stating your name and providing your city of residence.

John Draxler commended the Council for their hard work.

Thomas Doyel expressed his concerns regarding theft and trash left behind by tenants near his home.

Noor Memon commented on the Bastille. He would the total cost to repair the Bastille so that he can submit a a proposal.

Bob Ramos thanked the city for opening the restrooms at Civic Park during the events in the park. He also commented on the street sweeper contract, and he asked when Hidden Valley Park would be on the agenda for discussion.

Sharon Reed commented on the homeless person on 11th Ave. and LaceyBlvd.

Kimber Regan commented on the homeless camp on Shepard Dr. and Hume Ave. She asked where the homeless people would be relocated?

FEMA Representative, Stephanie Carnero commented on the homeless camp on Shepard Dr. and Hume Ave., and she shared her concerns about the people being kicked out of there.

CONSENT CALENDAR:

Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these matters unless a request is made and then the item will be removed from the Consent Calendar to be discussed and voted upon by a separate motion.

Mayor Paden pulled item F.

Motion to approve the consent calendar except for the items pulled for separate discussion.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

ABSENT:

Passed (UNANIMOUS)
Council Member Mark Kairis
Council Member Kalish Morrow
Travis Paden, Kalish Morrow, Lou Martinez, Mark Kairis
Diane Sharp

A. Procedural Waiver: Waive reading in full of resolutions and ordinances and approval and adoption of same by reading title the only.

B. City Clerk: Approval of the Minutes of the August 1, 2023 Meeting C. City Clerk: Approval of the Minutes of the August 15, 2023 Meeting D. Administration: Approval of a 5-year contract with Brandley Engineering, of Loomis, California, to provide Airport Engineering, Planning and Construction Management Services for State and Federally funded Airport Improvement Projects.

E. IT: Approval of the renewal of the three-year Microsoft software licensing from Dell Computer Corporation in the amount of $244,154.58
F. Public Works: Approval of the Suggested Routes to School plans for Hanford Elementary School District and Saint Rose-Thomas McCarthy School for the upcoming 2023-2024 school year.

G. Public Works: Approval of the Suggested Routes to School plans for Frontier Elementary School, Pioneer Elementary School, and Pioneer Middle School for the upcoming 2023- 2024 school year.

H. Fire: Approval of the acceptance of an award from the 2022 State Homeland Security Grant Program (SHSGP) funding, in the amount of $49,115 for the Hanford Fire Department; Appropriation and Authorization to utilize the funding to purchase Unmanned Aircraft (Drones) and Incident Command Training.

PULLED CONSENT ITEMS:

A. Public Works: Approval of the Notice of Completion, for a final project cost of $3,594,350.00, for the Drilling and Development of Water Wells 51 and 52 Project, by ZIM Industries, Inc., and Authorization for the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest and file said Notice with Kings County Recorder’s Office. [Item F]

Pulled by Mayor Paden.

Mayor Paden pulled the item to commend staff.

Motion to Approve.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

ABSENT:

Passed (UNANIMOUS)
Council Member Travis Paden
Council Member Lou Martinez
Travis Paden, Kalish Morrow, Lou Martinez, Mark Kairis
Diane Sharp
PUBLIC HEARING:

A. Community Development: Public hearing to consider any comments received regarding the 2022-23 CDBG Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) and Approval of the submittal of the Program Year 2022 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report.

Mayor Paden opened the public hearing at 7:44 p.m. and called for the staff report. Housing Analyst Sandra Lerma- Martinez presented the staff report for the Council's review and approval.

Public Comment:

IN-FAVOR:

None.

OPPOSSED:

None.

Motion to Approve.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

ABSENT:

Passed (UNANIMOUS)
Council Member Kalish Morrow
Council Member Mark Kairis
Kalish Morrow, Lou Martinez, Mark Kairis
Diane Sharp

Mayor Paden closed the public hearing at 7:46 p.m.

GENERAL BUSINESS:

A. Public Works: Approval of a two-year contract, with three one year options for a total of five (5) years, with Sweeping Corporation of America (Visalia, CA) in the amount of $632,660.07 and approve designating four City owned street sweepers as surplus and authorizing their sale.

Interim Public Works Director Russ Sterling provided the background and discussed other cities' sweep schedules, the bid proposal options, and the advantages of outsourcing. Dir. Sterling presented the modified recommendation to approve the award of the contract to Sweeping Corporation of America (SCA) for an amount not to exceed $869,290.00 for the contract to include 4 per month frequency on City streets; 3 per week frequency in the Downtown Historic areas; Removal of the line item for sweeping of the Corp Yard lots; and declare four (4) City- owned street sweepers as surplus and authorize their sale for the Council's review and consideration. Staff answered questions from the Council. Council Member Morrow spoke in support of the contract. After a brief discussion, Council Member Morrow made the motion to approve.

RESULT:

MOVER:

SECONDER:

AYES:

ABSENT:

Passed (UNANIMOUS)
Council Member Kalish Morrow
Council Member Lou Martinez
Travis Paden, Kalish Morrow, Lou Martinez, Mark Kairis
Diane Sharp
COUNCIL COMMENTS AND COMMUNICATIONS:

At this time, any Council Member may ask a question for clarification, make an announcement, or report briefly on their activities. In addition, subject to Council Policies and Procedures, they may request staff to report back to the Council at a subsequent meeting concerning any matter or take action to direct staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. (GOV. CODE SEC. 54954.2)
The City Manager reminded the Council he would not be at the next City Council meeting, and the City Council Handbook discussion will be presented on October 19th. Council Member Martinez requested an update on Hidden Valley Park.

A. Council Future Agenda Items
B. Upcoming Events and Important Dates:

September 20 & 21: Active Transportation Plan (ATP) Walk Assessment Open House in the Civic Auditorium More info
September 20-22: League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo in Sacramento
September 23 & 30: Free Fitness Court Classes 8:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. at Hidden Valley Park
October 3: Regular City Council Meeting
October 3: Hanford Police Department 2023 National Night Out 6:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m. in Civic Park
October 7 & 8: Renaissance Fair 10:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. in Civic Park ADJOURNMENT:

Mayor Paden adjourned the meeting at 8:10 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Natlie Corral
City Clerk

11.C.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 10/3/2023 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Approval of an In-Kind contract with the Hanford Chamber of Commerce, consistent with the recommendation of the Council Ad-Hoc subcommittee, that memorializes the services to be offered in exchange for office space in the Courthouse.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: That the City Council, by motion, approve an in-kind contract with the Hanford Chamber of Commerce, consistent with the recommendation of the Council Ad-Hoc subcommittee, that memorializes the services to be offered in exchange for office space in the Courthouse.

BACKGROUND:

During the May 2, 2023 Council Study Session, the City Council received a report on the history of the relationship between the City of Hanford and the Hanford Chamber of commerce. At the conclusion of that session, the Council appointed Vice-Mayor Kairis and Council woman Morrow to a Chamber subcommittee and directed the subcommittee to meet with representatives of the Chamber and pursue the possibility of a future contract that would memorialize Chamber services in exchange for the value of the office space that the city provides in the Courthouse.

The subcommittee met with the Chamber representatives, during which the Chamber acknowledged the City's current fiscal constraints, and provided a list of services that the Chamber currently offers to its members and the community at large. Using that list as a starting point, an agreement was drafted and ultimately both parties approved of the attached agreement. The Chamber agrees to provide a variety of the services attached in Exhibit "A" of the agreement in exchange for the value of the office space that they occupy.

Pursuant to the agreement, and separate from the work of their foundation in securing sponsorships for the Winter Wonderland event, the Chamber will continue its longstanding partnership with the City and provide business support and visitor related services to the community.

FISCAL IMPACT:

ATTACHMENTS:

1. 2023 Chamber of Commerce Services Agreement - Final

-1-

SERVICES AGREEMENT
* * * * * * * * * * *
THIS AGREEMENT, made and effective the 1 st day of October, 2023, by and between the CITY OF HANFORD, a municipal corporation (hereinafter “City”), and the CHAMBER OF COMMERCE of the City of Hanford, a California non-profit corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California (hereinafter “Chamber”).

W I T N E S S E T H
In consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. RECITALS. This agreement is made and entered into with respect to the following facts:
a. The Chamber is organized for the purpose of promoting the social, civic, and economic welfare of the City and vicinity;
b. City is desirous of promoting its advantages as a commercial and industrial center, by disseminating information relative thereto and of soliciting and serving inquiries relative to its possibilities of receiving new commercial and industrial concerns, and providing assistance to existing firms in their growth and expansion plans;
c. The City is desirous of promoting, soliciting, and serving inquiries relative to visiting the community and connecting visitors with existing businesses.

-2-
d. Chamber operates by and through its board of directors and possesses special knowledge, experience, and facilities for developing and servicing a healthy commercial and industrial community; and
e. The City desires to engage Chamber for the purpose of publicizing and advertising the advantages of the City.

2. TERM.
a. The term of this Agreement shall be effective from October 1, 2023, until September 30, 2024, except that this Agreement: (i) will automatically renew on a year-to-year basis; and (ii) may be terminated by either party as provided herein.
b. Should Chamber breach any term or condition of this Agreement or fail to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement that it is obligated to perform hereunder, the City shall have the right to immediately terminate this Agreement.
c. The City or Chamber may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving ninety (90) calendar days prior written notice of termination. The termination shall be effective on the ninety-first (91st) calendar day after the date of such written notice.

3. SERVICES: During the term hereof, Chamber shall undertake to provide services that benefit City and businesses operating within City’s boundaries, including, but not limited, to the services identified on the attached Exhibit ‘A,’ which is incorporated herein by reference.

-3-

4. COMPENSATION.
a. In consideration for the services that Chamber will provide to the City hereunder, City will lease 113 Court Street, Suite 104 to Chamber for ONE AND/NO100 DOLLAR ($1.00) per fiscal year (July 1 through June 30). The parties agree that Chamber’s breach of this Agreement shall constitute a breach under the Lease, and Chamber’s breach of the Lease shall constitute a breach under this Agreement. This rental rate identified herein will remain in effect as long as this Agreement is effective; City may require Chamber to pay the market rate for rent upon the termination or expiration of this Agreement.

5. INDEMNIFICATION. Chamber agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers from and against all claims, demands, actions, injuries, liabilities, losses, costs or damages, direct or indirect, and any and all attorney’s fees and other expenses which the City or its officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers may sustain or incur as a consequence of or in any way relate to Chamber, or its employees’, agents’ and subcontractors’ performance of Chamber’s responsibilities and obligations contained in this Agreement. This indemnification shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

6. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS.
a. Chamber will, during the term of this Agreement, maintain insurance coverage which shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office (ISO) Form CG 0001 1207 covering CGL on an ‘occurrence’ basis, including

-4-
products-completed operations, personal and advertising injury, with limits no less than TWO MILLION AND NO/100 DOLLARS
($2,000,000) per occurrence. Alternatively, Chamber may maintain a CGL policy with limits of no less than ONE MILLION AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($1,000,000) per occurrence and an umbrella coverage policy with coverage limits of no less than ONE MILLION AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($1,000,000) and which has a scope of coverage as broad as Chamber’s CGL policy. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be FOUR MILLION AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($4,000,000).
(2) Automobile Liability: If one (1) or more automobile will be utilized in the performance of the Services, Chamber shall maintain ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Chamber has no owned autos, hired (Code 8), and non-owned autos (Code 9), with a limit no less than ONE MILLION AND NO/100 DOLLARS
($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Workers’ Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with a limit of no less than ONE MILLION AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease.

If Chamber maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by Chamber.

-5-
b. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require Chamber to purchase coverage with a lower deductible or retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. Alternatively, City may require Chamber to provide a financial guarantee satisfactory to City guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention.
c. The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1) City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL and automobile policies with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Chamber including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations; products used by Chamber; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Chamber for purposes of performing services hereunder. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to Chamber’s insurance at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10 and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used. The coverage shall contain no special

-6-
limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City and its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(2) For any claims related to this Agreement, Chamber’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self- insurance maintained by City and/or its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be in excess of Chamber’s insurance and shall be non-contributory.
(3) Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled or modified without prior notice to City. d. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII.
e. Chamber shall furnish City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by City before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive Chamber’s obligation to provide them. City reserves the right to require complete,

-7-
certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time.
f. Chamber hereby grants to City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of Chamber may acquire against City and/or its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Chamber agrees to obtain endorsements necessary to effect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.
g. Chamber shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies, or, if subcontractors maintain separate coverage, Chamber shall furnish to City separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. The insurance policies of subcontractors shall satisfy all of the requirements stated herein.

7. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR STATUS. It is understood and agreed that Chamber, in the performance of this Agreement, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of the City. Chamber and its employees shall obtain no retirement benefits or other benefits that accrue to the City’s employees and Chamber hereby expressly waives any claim it may have to any such rights. Nothing in this Agreement shall create or be construed as creating a partnership, joint venture or any other relationship between the City and Chamber.

-8-

8. NOTICES. All notices herein required shall be in writing and shall be sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:

Chamber of Commerce City of Hanford
113 Court St., Ste. #104 319 N. Douty Street
Hanford, CA 93230 Hanford, CA 93230
Attn: Executive Director Attn: City Manager

9. COMFORMANCE TO APPLICABLE LAWS. Chamber shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and city laws, rules and ordinances. No discrimination shall be made by Chamber in the employment of persons to work under this Agreement because of race, color, national origin ancestry, sex or religion of such person.

10. ATTORNEYS’ FEES. If an action at law or in equity is necessary to enforce or interpret the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees, costs and necessary disbursements in addition to any other reasonable relief to which he may be entitled. With respect to any suit, action or proceeding arising out of or related to this Agreement, or the documentation related hereto, the parties hereby submit to the jurisdiction and venue of the Superior Court, for the County of Kings, State of California for any proceeding arising hereunder.

11. SOLE AND ONLY AGREEMENT. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties hereto with respect to the matters set forth herein and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties regarding said matters.

Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or in writing, have been made by any party or anyone acting on behalf of any party which is not embodied in the Agreement and no other agreement, statement or promise shall be valid or binding.

-9-

12. INVALIDITY. If any provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force and effect without being impaired or invalidated in anyway.

13. AMENDMENT. No change, amendment or modification of the Agreement shall be valid unless the same be in writing and signed by the parties hereto.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and year first identified below.

Dated: October ____, 2023 CITY OF HANFORD, a municipal corporation,
By ________________________________
TRAVIS PADEN, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
NATALIE CORRAL, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

GRISWOLD, LaSALLE, COBB
DOWD & GIN, L.L.P., City Attorney
By: ____________________________
TY N. MIZOTE
Dated: October ____, 2023

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
By ________________________________
__________________, Board President

-10-
EXHIBIT “A”
Chamber Services
Chamber Member Services Provided:

Provide a City Guide for the community and guests of the community highlighting major tourism areas
Maintain the “New Business Toolkit” with input from City departments Host the Annual Chamber Business Summit-
Collaborate with the City on business related programs
Offer the New Small Business Grant Program
Collaborate on the implementation of new digital kiosks around the City Work with City staff on future potential grants for Businesses including garnering letters of support and providing input on grant programs
Social Media Promotions
Luncheon/Networking Meetings
Chamber Mixers
Referrals for City services to member businesses
Business Workshops/Seminars
Certificates of Origin
Membership/Mailing List & Mailing Labels For Members
HR & Legislative Updates: Local, County, State & Federal For Members SBA Information and Workshops
EDD/EAC Updates and Workshops
Advocacy in Support of Business Issues
Member to Member Business Support

-11-
Coordination of Christmas Parade
City of Hanford Business Retention Benefits Provided
Business financing direction
Identifying permit licensing agencies
Addressing industry specific issues
Advocacy for incoming industry

11.D.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 10/3/2023 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Approval of a Facility Lease Agreement with MSI, Inc. for the City property located at 426 W. Lacey Blvd, more commonly referred to as the Former Goodwill building, for an initial rent of $3,600 per month increasing by 5% annually.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: That the City Council, by motion, approve the Facility Lease Agreement with MSI, Inc. for the City property located at 426 W. Lacey Blvd, more commonly referred to as the Former Goodwill building, for an initial rent of $3,600 per month increasing by 5% annually.

BACKGROUND:

The City was approached by representatives of MSI Hanford in June of 2021 about leasing the old Goodwill site. At the time of the request, the Goodwill building was being used for occasional Senior programs and the warehouse was being used for storage of various city-related items; mostly old and unusable.

During the negotiations process with MSI, which have been lengthy due to the development of the required improvements that will be needed to accommodate their commercial operation, Recreation staff was able to relocate the Senior programs to the Veterans and Seniors building and discard or relocate the items in the warehouse and make the property ready for lease.

Between June 2021 and March 2022 the City Manager negotiated with representatives of MSI and settled on an appropriate monthly rent for the entire facility and a lease term of 5 years with a 5-year option. After further inspection of the property, MSI requested that the City rehabilitate all pavement areas on the site. In response, the City resumed negotiations with MSI, which ultimately resulted in the attached agreement, which will have a lower initial lease amount, an increased annual adjustment (5%) and MSI constructed improvements (attached) that will total almost one million dollars.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The rental of this facility will provide $43,200 per year in additional funding, increasing by 5% annually, to the City’s General Fund, which can be used to fund future Police, Fire and Parks services.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. MSI Lease for 426 W. Lacey Blvd - Final

2. MSI Proposal for Improvements

1 LEASE AGREEMENT
* * * * *
This Lease Agreement (“Lease”) is made effective on the _____ day of ______, 2023, by and between the CITY OF HANFORD, a municipal corporation (“Landlord”), CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS, INC., a Delaware corporation, (“Tenant”).

In consideration of the terms contained in this Lease, Landlord and Tenant agree to the following:

1. PREMISES
A. Landlord owns the real property (“Landlord Property”) located at 426 W.

Lacey Blvd., Hanford, California, that is more particularly described in the attached Exhibit “A,” which is incorporated herein by reference.

B. Landlord hereby leases to Tenant and Tenant rents from Landlord the portion of the Landlord Property (“Premises”), totaling 17,382 square feet of building area in addition to the exterior fenced and parking area, that is generally described as follows:
(1) The office/retail building located at Landlord Property, consisting of approximately 5,382 square feet;
(2) The fenced areas on the parcel;
(3) The entirety of the paved parking areas; and
(4) The entire eleven thousand (12,000) square feet of the metal warehouse located at the Landlord Property; all as further shown by the enclosed areas on Exhibit B.

The Premises are more particularly depicted on the attached Exhibit “B,” which is incorporated herein by reference.

2. TERM OF LEASE
A. The initial term (“Initial Term”) of this Lease shall be ten (10) years commencing upon full execution and delivery of possession of the Premises to Tenant (the “Commencement Date”) and ending at 11:59 p.m., on the last day of the one hundred twentieth month. (“Expiration Date”). After established, Landlord and Tenant will confirm Commencement and Expiration Date in writing.

B. Tenant shall have the option to extend the term of this Lease by five (5) additional years (the “Option”) at the expiration of the Initial Term if Tenant is not in default, beyond any notice and cure period, at the time of the exercise of the option. If Tenant elects to

2 exercise the option to extend, Tenant shall notify Landlord in writing at least one hundred eighty (180) calendar days prior to the expiration of the Initial Term. The Option shall be upon the same terms and conditions, including Rent which shall continue to increase annually by five percent (5%).

C. If Tenant continues to occupy the Premises after this Lease expires, the Lease shall continue on a month-to-month basis on the terms set forth in this document.

3. RENT
A. Monthly Rent:
(1) During the first year of the Lease’s term, Tenant will pay to Landlord $3,600.00 per month (“Rent”) in advance on or before the first (1st) day of each calendar month; provided however that the first rental payment shall be due on January 1, 2024.
(2) The Rent shall be increased annually by five percent (5%). Each annual adjustment shall occur on the first (1 st) day of the month immediately following the anniversary of the Effective Date (e.g., if the Commencement Date is September 20, the annual rental rate adjustment shall occur on October 1 of each year).

B. Security Deposit:

Upon request by Landlord, Tenant will provide information to establish its creditworthiness.

C. Late Charge and Interest:

If Rent is not received by Landlord within ten (10) days of a date due, Tenant shall pay:
(i) ten percent (10%) of the overdue amount as a late charge; and (ii) interest on the unpaid amount at the rate of one and one-half percent (1.5%) per month.

4. TAXES AND UTILITIES
A. Tenant understands and agrees that: (1) this Lease may create a possessory interest in Tenant which may be subject to property taxes; (2) the personal property of Tenant may be subject to property taxes; and (3) this Lease may be subject to property taxes.

Tenant shall pay all such taxes before they become delinquent.

B. If any taxes are charged to Landlord or Landlord’s Property as a result of Tenant’s personal property, trade fixtures, or possessory interest in the Premises, or if the assessed value of the Premises is increased due to the value of Tenant’s property or trade fixtures, Tenant shall, on demand, immediately pay Landlord amounts equal to the increased or new taxes caused by Tenant. Tenant’s duty to pay increased or new taxes charged to Landlord or Landlord’s property shall continue as long as this Lease remains in effect.

3 C. Tenant shall timely pay all charges for water, gas, electricity, sewer service, telephone service, refuse removal and all other utilities and services supplied to the Premises during the term of this Lease.

5. USE OF PREMISES
A. Permitted Use:

The Premises may be used and occupied for the retail and wholesale sale, distribution, and storage of electrical supplies and related activities, warehouse and general office use, and related activities, or any other lawful purpose.

B. Prohibited Uses:

When using the Premises for the permitted purpose stated in Section 5.A. above, Tenant shall not: (i) use the Premises in violation of any law, ordinance, or regulation; or (ii) use the Premises in a way that creates a nuisance or which causes damage to the Premises or any other property.

C. Sublease. Upon written approval by Landlord, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, Tenant may sublease all or any portion of the Lease.

6. TENANT IMPROVEMENTS
A. Tenant may install or construct improvements at the Premises and modify the Premises only after receiving Landlord’s written approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. Work approved by Landlord must be done in full compliance with all laws, ordinances, and regulations.

B. Improvements installed at the Premises by Tenant will not be removed by Tenant at the expiration or termination of this Lease unless Landlord agrees with the request from Tenant, in writing, at or prior to the expiration or termination of this Lease, to remove Tenant’s improvements. Approval will not be arbitrarily withheld. If Landlord requires the removal of Tenant-installed improvements, Tenant will, following removal work, promptly repair any damage to the Premises and will return the Premises to the condition that existed on the Effective Date, reasonable wear and tear excepted.

C. Tenant will be solely responsible for maintaining, repairing, and improving the Premises so the Premises comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and similar accessibility regulations. Landlord will not be required to modify the Premises or install any improvements that may be required to cause the Premises to be ADA-compliant. (i) The Premises have NOT been inspected by a Certified Access Specialist (CASp). The following Notice is hereby given to Tenant, and Tenant hereby acknowledges receipt of such Notice:

4 NOTICE TO PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNER/TENANT:

YOU ARE ADVISED TO KEEP IN YOUR RECORDS ANY WRITTEN INSPECTION

REPORT AND ANY OTHER DOCUMENTATION CONCERNING YOUR PROPERTY SITE THAT IS GIVEN TO YOU BY A CERTIFIED ACCESS SPECIALIST.

IF YOU BECOME A DEFENDANT IN A LAWSUIT THAT INCLUDES A CLAIM

CONCERNING A SITE INSPECTED BY A CERTIFIED ACCESS SPECIALIST, YOU MAY

BE ENTITLED TO A STAY (TEMPORARY STOPPAGE) OF THE CLAIM AND AN EARLY EVALUATION CONFERENCE.

IN ORDER TO REQUEST THE STAY AND EARLY EVALUATION CONFERENCE, YOU

WILL NEED TO VERIFY THAT A CERTIFIED ACCESS SPECIALIST HAS INSPECTED THE SITE THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THE CLAIM. YOU WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED TO

PROVIDE THE COURT AND THE PLAINTIFF WITH THE COPY OF A WRITTEN

INSPECTION REPORT BY THE CERTIFIED ACCESS SPECIALIST, AS SET FORTH IN CIVIL CODE SECTION 55.54. THE APPLICATION FORM AND INFORMATION ON HOW

TO REQUEST A STAY AND EARLY EVALUATION CONFERENCE MAY BE OBTAINED AT http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selftielp/.

YOU ARE ENTITLED TO REQUEST, FROM A CERTIFIED ACCESS SPECIALIST WHO

HAS CONDUCTED AN INSPECTION OF YOUR PROPERTY, A WRITTEN INSPECTION

REPORT AND OTHER DOCUMENTATION AS SET FORTH IN CIVIL CODE SECTION

55.53. YOU ARE ALSO ENTITLED TO REQUEST THE ISSUANCE OF A DISABILITY ACCESS INSPECTION CERTIFICATE, WHICH YOU MAY POST ON YOUR PROPERTY.

D. Tenant shall keep the Premises and all improvements on the Premises free from liens.

E. All of Tenant’s improvement work will be done at Tenant’s sole cost.

Landlord will not be responsible for any costs associated with Tenant’s improvements.

F. Tenant shall not place on the windows, doors, exterior walls, walkways, or roof of the Premises any signs, advertisements, banners, or any other similar item without Landlord’s prior written consent, which will not be unreasonably withheld.

5 7.1 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR
A. Tenant shall, at Tenant’s sole cost and expense, keep the outdoor areas of the Premises free of weeds and debris.

B. Except as otherwise provided herein, Tenant shall be responsible for maintenance and minor repair of the Premises that does not exceed five hundred dollars ($500.00) per occurrence.

C. If Tenant or Tenant’s agents, directors, officers, employees, customers, invitees, or contractors causes damage to the Premises, Tenant will promptly notify Landlord in writing. In such case, the five hundred dollar ($500.00) per occurrence limit described in subsection B. above shall not apply, and Tenant will be responsible for promptly repairing such damage at is sole cost.

D. With the exception of Tenant’s responsibilities described in subsection C. above and the provisions of Section 7.2 below, Landlord shall be responsible for the repair of structural components of the office/retail building located on the Premises, including the repair of the roof, HVAC, and plumbing systems, if costs do not exceed twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) per occurrence. Any repair exceeding the twenty thousand dollar ($20,000.00) limit shall be considered destruction of the Premises for purposes of Section 7.2 below. Landlord shall have no obligation to maintain, repair, or improve the warehouse structure, and Tenant leases that portion of the Premises in an AS-IS, WHERE-IS condition.

E. After thirty (30) days prior written notice to Tenant, except in the case of an emergency in which case no prior notice is necessary, Landlord or Landlord’s contractor may enter the Premises to conduct the necessary work for which Tenant is responsible if Tenant fails to satisfy its duties under this Section 7.1. For purposes of this Section 7.1, an emergency shall exist if the Premises pose an imminent threat to the safety of people or structures. Tenant will, in accordance with Section 12.B. below, pay Landlord for any costs incurred by Landlord for such work performed on Tenant’s behalf.

F. The systems, including mechanical, plumbing, electrical, and HVAC, for the office/retail building on the Premises shall be in good working order at the commencement of this Lease.

G. At the expiration of this Lease, Tenant shall return the Premises to Landlord in broom clean condition.

7.2 DAMAGE AND DESTRUCTION
A. Destruction Due to Insured Risk. If, during the term of this Lease, the Premises are totally or partially damaged or destroyed from any risk covered by the insurance maintained or required to be maintained by Tenant pursuant to Section 8.2 below, Tenant shall, subject to the provisions of this section, at its sole cost and expense, forthwith repair and restore the same to substantially the same condition existing immediately prior to said damage or destruction

6 with all reasonable dispatch and diligence. Except as otherwise provided herein, if applicable laws do not permit the repair and restoration, Tenant may, but shall not be obligated to, terminate this Lease by giving notice to Landlord, whereupon this Lease shall terminate and Landlord and Tenant shall be released from all liabilities and obligations under this Lease, except for such as have accrued prior to the date of termination. Provided that the insurance required herein has been maintained in full force and effect, if the cost of repair and restoration exceeds the amount of the proceeds received from such insurance, Tenant may, except as otherwise provided herein, elect to terminate this Lease by giving notice to Landlord within fifteen (15) calendar days after determining that the cost of repair and restoration will exceed the amount of insurance proceeds. If Tenant so elects to terminate this Lease, Landlord, within fifteen (15) calendar days after receiving Tenant's notice to terminate, can elect to contribute the difference between the amount of insurance proceeds and the cost of the repair and restoration, in which case Tenant shall repair and restore the Premises as herein required. Tenant shall give Landlord satisfactory evidence that all sums contributed by Landlord as provided in this section have been expended by Tenant in paying the cost of repair and restoration. If Tenant elects to terminate this Lease and Landlord does not elect to contribute toward the cost of repair and restoration as provided in this section, this Lease shall terminate and Landlord and Tenant shall be released from all liabilities and obligations under this Lease, except for such as have accrued prior to the date of termination, and Landlord shall be entitled to all insurance proceeds payable with respect to the Premises, and Tenant shall be entitled to all insurance proceeds payable with respect to lost income and its trade fixtures, furniture, equipment, inventory and other personal property. Tenant shall possess no right to terminate this Lease if the damage or destruction results from the negligence or willful misconduct of Tenant or its agents, directors, officers, employees, customers, invitees, or contractors; in such case, Tenant will be responsible for the difference between the amount of insurance proceeds and the cost to repair and restore the Premises (or for the damages incurred by Landlord if applicable laws do not permit the repair and restoration of the Premises).

B. Destruction Due to Uninsured Risk. If, during the term of this Lease, the Premises are totally or partially damaged or destroyed and such risk is not covered by the insurance maintained or required to be maintained hereunder, Tenant may, except as otherwise provided herein, elect to terminate this Lease by giving notice (“Termination Notice”) to Landlord within sixty (60) calendar days after it has been determined that such damage or destruction is from a risk not covered by such insurance. If Tenant gives a Termination Notice, Landlord, within fifteen (15) calendar days after receiving such Termination Notice, can agree to contribute the full amount necessary to repair and restore the Premises, in which case Landlord shall forthwith repair and restore the Premises to substantially the same condition existing immediately prior to said damage or destruction with all reasonable dispatch and diligence. If Tenant gives a Termination Notice and Landlord does not elect to contribute toward the cost of repair and restoration as provided in this Section 7.2, this Lease shall terminate and Landlord and Tenant shall be released from all liabilities and obligations under this Lease, except for those that are identified herein as ongoing and those that have accrued prior to the date of termination. If Tenant does not give a Termination Notice, this Lease shall continue in full force and effect. Except as otherwise provided, if applicable laws do not permit the repair and restoration, either Landlord or Tenant may, but shall not be obligated to, terminate this Lease by giving notice to the other, whereupon this Lease shall terminate and Landlord and Tenant shall be released from all liabilities and obligations under this Lease, except for those that are identified herein as ongoing and those that have accrued prior to the date of termination. Notwithstanding the provisions of this subsection B., Tenant shall possess no right to terminate this Lease if the damage

7 or destruction results from the negligence or willful misconduct of Tenant or its agents, directors, officers, employees, customers, invitees, or contractors; in such case, Tenant will be solely responsible for the cost to repair and restore the Premises (or for the damages incurred by Landlord if applicable laws do not permit the repair and restoration of the Premises).

C. Damage Near End of Term. If, during the last eighteen (18) months of the term of this Lease, the Premises are totally or partially damaged or destroyed from any cause (whether insured or not) to an extent such that repair and restoration could not be completed within ninety (90) calendar days (measured from the date of such damage or destruction), then Landlord or Tenant may terminate this Lease by written notice given within sixty (60) calendar days following the date of the damage or destruction; provided however, that if, on the date of the damage or destruction, Tenant has an unexercised option to extend the term of this Lease, Tenant may exercise such option by written notice given to Landlord within sixty (60) calendar days following the date of such damage or destruction, and upon such exercise, this Lease shall (subject to being terminated as otherwise provided in this Section 7.2) continue in full force and effect and the Premises or portions thereof which have been damaged or destroyed shall be repaired and restored in accordance with the provisions of this Section 7.2.

D. No Abatement of Rent. If, during the term of this Lease, the Premises are totally or partially damaged or destroyed from any cause (whether insured or not) and this Lease is not terminated as provided in this Section 7.2, the rent shall not be abated. Landlord and Tenant waive the provisions of California Civil Code Sections 1932(2) and 1933(4) and elect to be governed by the provisions of this Lease.

8.1 LIABILITY INSURANCE
A. Tenant will, during the term of this Lease, maintain insurance coverage which shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office (ISO) Form CG 0001, including products and completed operations, with a limit of no less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage, and a general aggregate limit of no less than four million dollars ($4,000,000).
(2) Automobile Liability: ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Tenant has no owned autos, hired (Code 8), and non-owned autos (Code 9), with a limit no less than ONE MILLION AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage
(3) Workers’ Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with a limit of no less than ONE MILLION AND NO/100 DOLLARS
($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease.

8 If Tenant maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, Landlord requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by Tenant.

B. Tenant’s insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1) Landlord and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL and automobile liability policies with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Landlord including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations; products used by Tenant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Tenant. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to Tenant’s insurance at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33 or CG 20 38 and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used.

The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to Landlord and its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(2) For any claims related to this Lease, Tenant’s insurance coverage shall be the primary insurance as respects Landlord and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self- insurance maintained by Landlord and/or its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be in excess of Tenant’s insurance and shall be non-contributory.
(3) Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with written notice to the City.

C. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII.

D. Tenant shall furnish Landlord with original certificates and amendatory endorsements required by this clause, or, if Tenant’s policies contain the required provisions and endorsements are unnecessary, Tenant shall provide excerpts from its policy(ies) as evidence of satisfaction of the requirements of this section. All certificates, endorsements, and policy excerpts are to be received and approved by Landlord before Tenant takes possession of the Premises.

However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to Tenant taking possession of the Premises shall not waive Tenant’s obligation to provide them.

9 E. Tenant hereby grants to Landlord and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of Tenant may acquire against Landlord and/or its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Tenant agrees to obtain endorsements necessary to effect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not Landlord has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

G. Landlord reserves the right to modify the insurance requirements contained in this Lease, including, without limitation, coverage limits, at the commencement of the extended Lease term.

8.2 PROPERTY INSURANCE
A. Tenant shall maintain on the office/retail and warehouse building located on the Premises (“Building”) a policy or policies of fire and extended coverage insurance, to the extent of at least one hundred percent (100%) of the full replacement value thereof, without deduction for depreciation. Said policy or policies shall include business interruption insurance and coverage for any additional cost resulting from debris removal and reasonable amounts of coverage for the enforcement of any ordinance or law regulating the reconstruction or replacement of any undamaged portion of the Building or other improvements required to be demolished or removed as a result of the enforcement of any building, zoning, safety or land use laws as a result of a covered cause of loss.

Said policy or policies shall also contain an agreed value provision in lieu of any coinsurance clause.

Such policy or policies shall not contain any deductible amounts in excess of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00). Any and all proceeds of such insurance shall be made payable to Landlord and Tenant and shall be deposited with any bank, trust or title company agreed to by Landlord and Tenant, as trustee, for the repair and restoration of the Building. From time to time during the term of this Lease, Landlord and Tenant shall each have the right to request that the company or companies issuing the fire insurance policy or policies required to be maintained under this section redetermine the full replacement value of the Building, and the insurance policy or policies shall be adjusted according to such redetermination.

B. Tenant shall self-insure its trade fixtures, equipment and other personal property from time to time located at the Premises.

9. LIABILITY
A. Indemnity by Tenant. Landlord will not be liable for and Tenant shall indemnify, defend, and hold Landlord and Landlord’s officers, officials, employees, and volunteers harmless from any and all injuries, damages, losses, penalties, costs (including attorneys’ fees), expenses, liabilities, claims, and causes of action resulting from:
(1) Tenant’s use of the Premises;
(2) Tenant’s breach of this Lease;

10 (3) Damage to the Premises by Tenant or Tenant’s agents, directors, officers, employees, customers, invitees, or contractors; (4) Any act or omission of:
(a) Tenant or its agents, directors, officers, employees, customers, invitees, or contractors; or
(b) Landlord or its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers, occurring under this Lease, with the exception of gross negligence and intentional misconduct and except as otherwise provided herein;
(5) Any damage to or loss of Tenant’s personal property or trade fixtures located at the Premises; provided however, such release from liability shall not apply to damage or loss caused by Landlord’s gross negligence or intentional misconduct; or
(6) Any ADA-related matter associated with the Premises.

B. The provisions of subsections A.(1) through A.(5) above shall survive the termination of this Lease.

C. Indemnity by Landlord. Landlord shall indemnify and hold harmless Tenant from and against every demand, claim, cause of action, judgment, and expense, and all loss and damage arising from any breach of or default in the performance of any obligation on Landlord’s part to be performed under the terms of this Lease; from claims by third parties arising out of Landlord’s ownership, use and maintenance of the real property; and from any violation of any environmental law or existing environmental condition existing prior to Lease Commencement.

10. ASSIGNMENT
A. Tenant shall not assign, sublet or otherwise transfer all or any part of Tenant’s interest in this Lease or possession of the Premises or permit the use or occupancy of all or any part of the Premises by any person (collectively “Assignment”), without Landlord’s prior consent, which consent Landlord agrees not to unreasonably withhold, condition or delay. Notwithstanding the foregoing, without Landlord’s consent Tenant may assign this Lease to any corporation, partnership, limited liability company or trust controlled by, controlling or under common control with the Tenant named herein; provided however, the assignee shall assume all of Tenant’s duties and obligations under this Lease in a writing delivered to Landlord.

B. The making of any Assignment without Lessor's prior written consent, if required by this Section 10, shall be void and shall constitute a default under this Lease. No Assignment, whether or not requiring Landlord’s consent under Section 10, shall release Tenant from any of its obligations under this Lease. Landlord’s consent to any Assignment shall not be deemed

11 or construed as a waiver of the requirement that Landlord’s consent be obtained to any subsequent Assignment requiring such consent under this Section 10.

11. ENTRY BY LANDLORD
Landlord and its authorized representatives shall, during Tenant’s business hours with Tenant or Tenant’s agent present, have the right to enter and inspect the Premises.

12. DEFAULT AND REMEDIES
A. Tenant Acts Constituting a Default: Any and all of the following shall constitute a default under this Lease:
(1) Breach of any non-monetary provision of this Lease, where such breach shall continue for a period of thirty (30) days after the receipt of Notice thereof from Landlord to Tenant; provided, however, that if the nature of Tenant's default is such that more than thirty (30) days are reasonably required for its cure, then Tenant shall not be deemed to be in default if Tenant commenced such cure within said thirty (30) day period and thereafter diligently prosecutes such cure to completion.
(2) The abandonment of the Premises by Tenant without the payment of Rent and without fulfilling Tenant’s other Lease obligations; or (3) Tenant’s failure to pay any amount required under this Lease within ten (10) calendar days.

B. Landlord Remedies:
(1) If Tenant breaches this Lease, Landlord shall have any and all remedies that may be available in law and equity, including, without limitation, the right to terminate this Lease and sue Tenant for damages. On termination, Landlord has the right to recover from Tenant:
(a) The unpaid rent owing at the time of termination of this Lease;
(b) The rent that would have been paid during the period between the Lease termination date and the date a court awards a judgment to Landlord (but only that portion which exceeds the losses that Tenant proves could have been
reasonably avoided);
(c) The rent that would have been paid after the date on which a court awards a judgment to Landlord through the date on

12 which the Lease would have expired if Tenant had not defaulted (but only that portion which exceeds the losses that Tenant proves could have been reasonably avoided; and
(d) Any other amount and court costs necessary to compensate Landlord for all problems, losses, expenses, and issues directly and indirectly caused by Tenant's default.

Rent to be paid pursuant to (a), (b), and (c) of this subsection (1) will include interest at the rate of one and one-half percent (1.5%) per month or the maximum amount allowed by law, whichever is less.

The rent to be paid pursuant to subsection (c) above is to be computed by discounting the amount at the discount of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco at the time of award.
(2) Landlord has the remedy described in California Civil Code Section 1951.4 (lessor may continue lease in effect after lessee’s breach and abandonment and recover rent as it becomes due, if lessee has right to sublet or assign subject only to reasonable limitations). (2) Upon ten (10) calendar days’ prior written notice to Tenant, Landlord may enter the Premises and cure any Tenant breach at Tenant’s cost; provided however, Landlord will not be required to give written notice if the condition of the Premises threatens the public’s safety. If Landlord incurs any expense to cure a Tenant breach, the expenses incurred by Landlord shall be immediately payable by Tenant and will bear interest at the rate of one and one- half percent (1.5%) per month from the date the cost is incurred by Landlord.

C. Landlord’s Default:
(1) Except as otherwise provided in Section 12.C.(2) below, Landlord shall be in default if it fails to perform any provision of this Lease and the breach is not cured within thirty (30) calendar days after written notice has been given by Tenant to Landlord.
(2) If the Landlord’s breach cannot be reasonably cured within the thirty (30) calendar day period, Landlord shall not be in default if Landlord commences to cure the breach within the thirty (30) calendar day period and diligently and in good faith continues to cure the breach.

13 13. NOTICE
Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, any notice, consent, authorization or other communication to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly given and received twenty-four (24) hours following personal delivery or if deposited with a nationally- recognized overnight delivery service, seven (7) days after deposited in the mail (certified mail, return receipt requested) to the following addresses:

In the case of Landlord:

City Manager
City of Hanford
319 N. Douty Street
Hanford, CA 93230
In the case of Tenant:

Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc.

Attn: Real Estate Department
1920 Westridge Drive
Irving, TX 75038
Telephone Number: (972) 582-5450
Facsimile Number: (972) 793-0510
Email: [email protected]

14. WAIVER OF BREACH
Landlord’s failure to strictly enforce this Lease shall not be a waiver of any of Landlord’s rights, nor shall any custom or practice which may develop between Landlord and Tenant become a waiver of Landlord’s right to require Tenant’s full performance under this Lease. Landlord’s waiver of a breach in one (1) instance shall not constitute a waiver of the same or similar breaches occurring later. Only a written notice from Landlord to Tenant shall serve as Landlord’s waiver of its rights under this Lease.

15. ATTORNEYS’ FEES
In the event of any lawsuit between Landlord and Tenant regarding this Lease, the prevailing party in the lawsuit shall be entitled to receive its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.

16. TIME OF ESSENCE
Time is of the essence in the performance of each provision of this Lease.

17. SEVERABILITY
If any term of this Lease is held by a court to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions of this Lease shall remain in full force and effect.

18. QUIET POSSESSION. Upon Tenant paying Rent for the Premises and observing and performing all of the covenants, conditions and provisions on Tenant's part to be observed and performed hereunder, Tenant shall have quiet enjoyment, possession and use of the Premises and the common areas, if any, for the entire Term hereof, including any extensions thereof, subject to all of the

14 provisions of this Lease. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to otherwise limit any implied covenant of quiet enjoying to Tenant in law or in equity.

19. PRIOR AGREEMENTS, AMENDMENTS
This Lease contains the entire agreement regarding Landlord’s and Tenant’s duties and rights regarding Tenant’s lease of the Premises. Any verbal promises made by either party shall be binding only if they are set forth in this Lease. In order to be enforceable, changes to this Lease must be in writing and signed by Landlord and Tenant.
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//

15 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Lease on the date first set forth above.

Dated: ________ ___, 2023
“TENANT”

CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL
DISTRIBUTORS, INC.,
a Delaware corporation
By: ________________________________
Jeremy McDonald,
Real Estate Manager
Dated: ________ ___, 2023
“LANDLORD”
City of Hanford
By: ______________________________

MARIO CIFUENTEZ, II
City Manager

16 EXHIBIT “A”
Landlord Property Legal Description
Lot 15 of S.E. BIDDLE’S SUBDIVISION of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 25, Township 18 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, in the City of Hanford, County of Kings, State of California, according to Map thereof recorded in Book 1, Page 117 of Maps.

17 EXHIBIT “B”
Premises Diagram
(entire parcel encircled as shown below)

1 | P a g e
License # 1007938
559-375-4446

PROPOSAL
Date: March 24, 2023
Attention: Nick Warner, Medallion Supply Hanford
RE: 426 W . Lacey Blvd Hanford – Parking Lot Concrete, Showroom & Warehouse Improvement Thank you for the opportunity to bid on the referenced project. Innovative Construction & Electric proposes to furnish all labor, materials and equipment for the sum of $977,300
Scope of Work:
• Parking Lot
o Demo, Removal and Disposal of Existing Asphalt
o Grade & Form Parking Lot (as per plans)
o Furnish and Install 4000PSI Concrete, 6” thick (as per plans) o Furnish and Install City of Hanford Trash Enclosure (as per City Standards) o Furnish and Install Christy Box (as per plans)
• Warehouse
o Pressure Wash and Prep Exterior Metal Walls
o Degrease and Pressure Wash Interior Floor
o Paint Entire Exterior Building (Color TBD)
o Furnish and Install HSI Logo
o Replacement and Installation of new interior High Bay Lighting (supplied by others) o Installation of Industrial Fans (supplied by others) o Troubleshoot existing exterior lighting (replacement of lighting will be additional cost) • Showroom/Office
o Removal of Decorative Stucco Popouts and Patch Up.
o Paint and Patch Holes in Walls & Ceilings of entire Showroom and Office Areas o Paint Entire Exterior Building (Color TBD)
o Demo and Removal of TBAR in area (as discussed during walk) o Repair of Damaged Acoustic Ceiling
o Assess Roof and Repair and Damages causing Leak
o Design & Build Kitchen Addition to exterior wall of building (Design TBD) o Replace all Damaged Store Front Windows
o Removal and Installation of Existing Windows (as discussed during walk) o Furnish and Installation of 42” High Base Cabinets with Counter (approximately 39LF) o Installation of 30ft Light Pole in Parking Lot with Power (Light and Pole to be Supplied by others)
o Prep & Epoxy Floor.
o Replace all Existing Light Switches and Receptacles (Material to be supplied by others) o Troubleshoot and Fix Neon Sign

2 | P a g e

• Exclusions
o Sewer Drain & Tie-In for Parking Lot is excluded. Plumber needs to verify slopes and lengths for accurate estimate.
o Parking lot survey excluded (To be provided by others) o Any additional work not mentioned in the scope of work will require an approved change order prior to commencing additional work

Progress Payment

• TBD

Upon acceptance of this proposal, Nick Warner, with MSI agrees to utilize Innovative Construction & Electric to perform the scope of work on the property mentioned above.

____________________________________________________
Nick Warner, MSI Date

___________________________________________________
Rudy Rabino, Innovative Construction & Electric Date

11.E.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 10/3/2023 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Authorization for the City Manager to execute documents and enter into a contract with Caltrans for the Kings-Tulare High-Speed Rail Station Transit-Oriented Development and Connectivity Plan and Cross Valley Corridor Rail Service Planning project to be funded through a $650,000 Sustainable Communities grant.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to execute documents and enter into a contract with Caltrans for the Kings-Tulare High-Speed Rail Station Transit-Oriented Development and Connectivity Plan and Cross Valley Corridor Rail Service Planning project BACKGROUND:

At the February 7, 2023 City Council Meeting, Council authorized staff to pursue a Sustainable Communities grant to evaluate and guide land use planning along Lacey Boulevard and the Kings- Tulare HSR Station area. An application for the Kings-Tulare High-Speed Rail Station Transit-Oriented Development and Connectivity Plan and Cross Valley Corridor (CVC) Rail Service Planning Project (Project) was submitted to Caltrans and the City was recently notified that the project had been awarded $650,000 in grant funding.

The project will guide land use planning along Lacey Boulevard and the Kings-Tulare HSR Station, support transit-oriented development, promote economic development and revitalization, enhance connections to transit and mobility choice, stimulate connectivity between Downtown Hanford and the Kings-Tulare Station, connect Hanford with other communities along the CVC, and support an efficient and effective multi-modal transportation system.

The City will act as the project lead and will work in coordination with several other stakeholders to develop a plan that is consistent with the City's General Plan and planning goals. The tentative start date for the project is January 2024 with a planned completion date of June 2026.

As part of the grant acceptance process, the City must have a resolution from the City Council authorizing the City Manager to execute documents and enter into a contract with Caltrans.

FISCAL IMPACT:

A 11.47% minimum inkind contribution is required

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 23-39-R

RESOLUTION NO. 23-39-R

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HANFORD,

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE DOCUMENTS AND ENTER

INTO A CONTRACT WITH CALTRANS FOR THE KINGS-TULARE HIGH-SPEED

RAIL STATION TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT AND CONNECTIVITY

PLAN AND CROSS VALLEY CORRIDOR RAIL SERVICE PLANNING PROJECT At regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford duly called and held on October 3, 2023, it was moved by Council Member , and seconded by Council Member, and carried that the following resolution be adopted.

WHEREAS, the City was awarded $650,000 in grant funding from the Sustainable Communities Competitive grant; and,

WHEREAS, the City develop the Kings-Tulare High-Speed Rail Station Transit-Oriented Development and Connectivity Plan and Cross Valley Corridor Rail Service Planning project; and,
WHEREAS, the City Manager may enter into contracts on behalf of the City of Hanford; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Hanford City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute documents and enter into a contract with Caltrans for the Kings-Tulare High-Speed Rail Station Transit-Oriented Development and Connectivity Plan and Cross Valley Corridor Rail Service Planning project.

PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford held on October 3, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: ______________________________________________________________________ NOES: ______________________________________________________________________ ABSTAIN: __________________________________________________________________ ABSENT: ___________________________________________________________________ Approved ___________________________________
Travis Paden
Mayor of the City of Hanford
ATTEST:
___________________________
Natalie Corral
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF KINGS )

CITY OF HANFORD )
I, Natalie Corral, City Clerk of the City of Hanford, do hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford held on the 3rd day of October 2023.

Date: ____________________ ___________________________________ City Clerk

CITY OF HANFORD CITY COUNCIL

STAFF REPORT
Tuesday, October 3, 2023
PROJECT: Annexation 162: A request to annex 12.17 acres into the City of Hanford from the Kings County jurisdiction and cancel the Williamson Act Contract for the property.

Prezone No. 0001-23: A request to prezone the land proposed to be annexed as R-L-5 Low-Density Residential, in accordance with the General Plan designation for the territory, Low-Density Residential.

Tentative Tract 940 (Stonehaven): A request, by D.R. Horton, to subdivide the

12.17 acres proposed to be prezoned R-L-5 Low-Density Residential into 82 single-family residential lots.

Planned Unit Development No. 13-23: A request to deviate from the standards of the Hanford Municipal Code, in order to utilize the small lot provisions of Section

17.10.100 to allow:
oReduced lot sizes between 3,600 – 4,999 square feet
oReduced lot widths
oReduced lot depths
oReduced setbacks
oException: No limitation on the width of the garage (standard regulation limits garage width to no more than 50% of the residence’s frontage) Location:The Project is located south of Hanford Armona Road, between 12 th and 13 th Avenues (APN011-040-030)

PLANNER: Gabrielle Myers, Senior Planner

STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Certify Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2023-95 for the project to the City Council.

2. Introduce and waive the first reading Ordinance. 23-06, approving Prezone No. 0001-23.

3. Adopt Resolution 23-36-R, initiating proceedings for Annexation 162 and direct staff to file the appropriate forms with the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) of Kings County.

4. Adopt Resolution 23-37-R, approving Tentative Tract 940.

5. Adopt Resolution 23-38-R, approving Planned Unit Development 13-23.

RECOMMENDED MOTION

1. I move to certify Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2023-95 for the project to the City Council.

Stonehaven

2. I move to introduce and waive the first reading Ordinance. 23-06, approving Prezone No. 0001-23.

3. I move to adopt Resolution 23-36-R, initiating proceedings for Annexation 162 and direct staff to file the appropriate forms with the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) of Kings County.

4. I move to adopt Resolution 23-37-R, approving Tentative Tract 940.

5. I move to adopt Resolution 23-38-R, approving Planned Unit Development 13-23.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Annexation 162
Annexation 162 is a request to annex 12.17 acres into the City of Hanford from the Kings County jurisdiction and cancel the Williamson Act Contract for the property. See Figure 1 and Attachment 1.

Figure 1:

Proposed Annexation Area (shown in yellow)

Stonehaven

Prezone No. 0001-23 is a request to prezone the land proposed to be annexed as R-L-5 Low- Density Residential, in accordance with the General Plan designation for the territory, Low- Density Residential. See Figure 2, below.

Figure 2: Prezone No. 0001-23
R-L-5 Low-Density Residential (outlined in bold)
Tentative Tract 940 (Stonehaven): A request, by D.R. Horton, to subdivide the 12.17 acres proposed to be prezoned R-L-5 Low-Density Residential into 82 single-family residential lots.

Tentative Tract 940 – Attached as Attachment 2.

Planned Unit Development No. 13-23 is a request to deviate from the standards of the Hanford Municipal Code, in order to utilize the small lot provisions of Section 17.10.100 to allow:
•Reduced lot sizes between 3,600 – 4,999 square feet
•Reduced lot widths
•Reduced lot depths
•Reduced setbacks
•Exception: No limitation on the width of the garage (standard regulation limits garage width to no more than 50% of the residence’s frontage)

Stonehaven

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Project Location
The project is located south of Hanford-Armona Road, east of 13 th Avenue (APN 011-040-030).

See Figure 3, below.

Figure 3: Project Location

Stonehaven

Existing Land Use

The lot is mostly vacant, with an existing house that is proposed to be demolished as part of the Project.

General Plan and Zoning Designation
The site is designated by the General Plan as Low-Density Residential with a Future Educational Facility overlay.

Figure 4: General Plan Designation

Stonehaven

Low-Density Residential Designation
In accordance with the General Plan, the expected density range for Low-Density Residential is two to 10 units per gross acre, with an expected average of four units per gross acre. According to Land Use Policy L31, the purpose of the Low-Density Residential land use designation is to provide mainly single-family development on lot sizes typically found in urban settings. Typical uses in the Low-Density Residential land use designation include residential uses in a variety of single-family lot types. Duplexes, second dwelling units, and home occupations can also be allowed when made compatible with the residential nature of the neighborhood, according to Policy L32.
“Floating” Educational Facility Designation
In accordance with the General Plan Policy L1000, where a site is not yet developed, the land use designation is allowed to “float” on the Land Use Map within the one-mile square section in which it is located. Locations along collector streets are preferred for new elementary schools.

During the consultation process, the local school districts were contacted and did not require use of this site as a school facility. The City’s role in development and managing school sites and programs is limited. The various school districts truly govern where a new school site would be located and when it would be necessary to construct or expand facilities, in order to adequately accommodate population growth. Elected governing school boards are responsible for budgeting and decision-making and the State Department of Education establishes school site and construction standards. The General Plan provides policy which focuses on collaboration with school districts in determining new school locations and utilizing school facilities for general public needs. School districts would be able to utilize the General Plan, along with other plans, standards, and codes, to establish new school sites and to make decisions on school amenities and cohesiveness with the surrounding area.

Educational services needed for the development of the Project will be provided by the Hanford Elementary School District (HESD) and Hanford Joint Union High School District (HJUHSD).

Payment of fees to a school district is considered mitigation for project impacts on school facilities (Government Code Section 65996(a)). Therefore, the project applicant would be required to pay the statutory fees to accommodate the impact of project-generated student.

Zoning
Current
The property is currently in the Kings County Jurisdiction and zoned AL-10 Limited Agriculture.

Stonehaven

Figure 5: Zoning

Stonehaven

The property is proposed to be prezoned R-L-5 Low-Density Residential, 5,000 square-foot minimum lot size, in accordance with the General Plan Designation for the property. See Figure

2. Adjacent Land Use and Zoning
Land Use Zoning General Plan Designation
North: Vacant MX-C Corridor Mixed Use
South: Vacant with large lot single-
family residence County AL-10 Low-Density Residential; Floating Future Educational Facility
East: Vacant; Planned Tract 937 R-L-5 Low-Density Residential West: Agriculture and Vacant County AL-10;
R-M
Medium-Density Residential;
Floating Future Educational
Facility
Planning Commission
The projects were presented to the Planning Commission on September 12, 2023.

The Planning Commission voted 4,0 on all items to:

1. Recommend certification of Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2023-95 for the project to the City Council.

2. Adopt Resolution 2023-26, recommending approval of Prezone No. 0001-23 to the City Council.

3. Find that the proposed Annexation No. 162 is consistent with the Hanford General Plan Policies L15 and L17 and forward Annexation No. 162 to the City Council, with a recommendation that an application be made to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) of Kings County.

4. Adopt Resolution 2023-27, recommending approval of Tentative Tract 940 to the City Council.

5. Adopt Resolution 2023-28, recommending approval of Planned Unit Development 13-23 to the City Council.

One person spoke in favor during the Public Comment period:

1. Matthew Chavez, Forward Planner D.R. Horton

PROJECT EVALUATION
Annexation No. 162

Stonehaven

Annexation 162 is a request to annex 12.17 acres into the City of Hanford from the Kings County jurisdiction and cancel the Williamson Act Contract for the property. See Figure 1 and Attachment 1.

Annexation of land into Hanford allows previously undeveloped land to become available for development and allows the City of Hanford to provide the territory that is annexed with its full range of City services. The annexation process can serve as an interim growth management tool, by limiting annexation to only the land that is needed for growth at the time.

The Hanford Planning Commission reviewed the proposed annexation and made a finding of consistency with the General Plan on September 12, 2023. Specifically, the Planning Commission found Annexation 162 consistent with the Hanford General Plan Policy L15 and L17:

Policy L15 Initiation of Annexations
Consider initiation of annexation of land into the City of Hanford only when the following criteria are met:

1. The land is within the Primary Sphere of Influence.

Analysis: The property proposed to be annexed is within the City’s Primary Sphere of Influence, as shown in Attachment 3.

2. The capacity of the water, sewer, fire, school, and police services are adequate to service the area to be annexed, or will be adequate at the time that development occurs.

Analysis: A Plan for Services has been prepared by Engineering for Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Storm Drainage.

Sewer Improvements
The developer’s engineer will provide a sanitary sewer master plan, complete with calculations for the entire subdivision prior to recording a subdivision final map for the development. A six-inch sanitary sewer main is required to be installed throughout the development designed to tie in with the sanitary sewer system with the development along the east boundary. The sanitary sewer tie-in-point is required to be located at the east end of “A” Street, as shown on the tentative map.

Storm Drainage Improvements
The developer’s engineer will provide a storm drainage master plan, complete with calculations for the entire subdivision prior to recording a subdivision final map for the development. All drainage from the subdivision is proposed to be retained in the retention basin within the tract to the east, Tentative Tract 937, Billingsly. The basin calculations for Tentative Tract 937 have accounted for storm drain intake from the Stonehaven subdivision and is in conformance with City Standards. The developer will install a storm drain catch basin on W. Spring Crest Street near the east boundary and tie in to existing underground storm drain piping that is stubbed to the east boundary leading to the a storm drain basin.

Stonehaven

Water System
The developer’s engineer will provide a water system master plan, complete with calculations for the entire subdivision, for City review and approval prior to recording a subdivision final map. Provisions will be made for service to future areas of development located adjacent to the subdivision.

All existing water wells located within the proposed development will be abandoned, in conformance with State of California Department of Health standards.

Fire and Police
Fire and police services are adequate to service the area to be annexed. Impacts to fire and police services will be mitigated through payment of impact fees.

School
Educational services needed for the development of the Project will be provided by the Hanford Elementary School District (HESD) and Hanford Joint Union High School District (HJUHSD). Payment of fees to a school district is considered mitigation for project impacts on school facilities (Government Code Section 65996(a)). Therefore, the project applicant would be required to pay the statutory fees to accommodate the impact of project- generated student.

Notice of the proposed project was sent to the interested agencies for pre-consultation and normal consultation. A response was received by the Hanford Joint Union High School District stating, “This area is within our most impacted school boundary.” The City’s role in development and managing school sites and programs is limited. The various school districts truly govern where a new school site would be located and when it would be necessary to construct or expand facilities, in order to adequately accommodate population growth. Elected governing school boards are responsible for budgeting and decision-making and the State Department of Education establishes school site and construction standards. The General Plan provides policy which focuses on collaboration with school districts in determining new school locations and utilizing school facilities for general public needs. School districts would be able to utilize the General Plan, along with other plans, standards, and codes, to establish new school sites and to make decisions on school amenities and cohesiveness with the surrounding area.

3. Land for development within the City limits is insufficient to meet the current land use needs.

Analysis: The applicant is proposing a 12.17-acre single-family residential development in the southwest planning area. Available land for new development within the Low-Density Residential land use designation is limited in the southwest planning area of the City. The majority of the properties designated for Low-Density Residential development have been developed or entitled, as shown in Figure 6, below. The proposal is considered an implementation of the General Plan.

Figure 6: Entitled Properties

Stonehaven

4. The territory to be annexed is contiguous to existing developed areas.

Analysis: The territory to be annexed is directly contiguous to the current City limits to the north, east, and west. Tentative Tract 937 was approved by the Planning Commission on January 24, 2023 for the property to the east, APN 011-040-007.

Policy L17 Plan for Services
Prepare and make publicly available a written Plan for Services that describes how urban services will be provided prior to initiating an annexation.

Analysis: A written Plan for Services is attached (Attachment 4).

Favorable Factors for Annexation
Favorable and unfavorable factors for annexation have been adopted by LAFCO. The existence of favorable or unfavorable factors should not decide approval or denial; however, a substantial number of favorable or unfavorable factors may determine approval or denial of the proposal.

1. The proposed area is close to urban development and municipal-type services and would enhance its potential for full development.

Analysis: The proposed area is close to the existing City limits and is a logical extension of the City. The annexation area can be served by municipal-type services. The annexation area is designated as Low-Density Residential by the General Plan and is

Stonehaven

necessary to accommodate growth within the City of Hanford. The development proposed for the annexation area is consistent with the General Plan.

2. The proposed annexation conforms to the adopted General Plan.

Analysis: The annexation area is proposed to be developed as a single-family residential subdivision. The subdivision is consistent with the General Plan designation, Low-Density Residential. The annexation is consistent with the General Plan Section 3.2.4, which states, “Annexation of land into Hanford allows previously undeveloped land to become available for development and allows the City of Hanford to provide the territory that is annexed with its full range of City services.” The annexation area is also consistent with Policy L15 and L17 of the General Plan, as analyzed above.

3. The proposed area is consistent with the sphere of influence.

Analysis: The property proposed to be annexed is within the City’s Primary Sphere of Influence, as shown in Attachment 3.

4. The proposed annexation comes with 100% consent of all landowners.

Analysis: There is one parcel proposed to be annexed. The annexation comes with 100% consent the property owners. The signed annexation application is attached – Attachment 5.

Williamson Act Contract
The property is in a Williamson Act Contract that has been protested by the City. The city will not “succeed” the contract for the property that was protested and the contract will be terminated upon annexation.

Vesting Tentative Tract 940 and Planned Unit Development No. 13-23 The project is a request, by D.R. Horton, to subdivide the 12.17-acre parcel into 82 single-family residences in an area proposed to be prezoned R-L-5 Low-Density Residential zone district. A planned unit development overlay is proposed, in order to allow utilization of Section 17.10.100, in order to permit the following:
oReduced lot sizes between 3,600 – 4,999 square feet
oReduced lot widths
oReduced lot depths
oReduced setbacks
oException: No limitation on the width of the garage (standard regulation limits garage width to no more than 50% of the residence’s frontage) See proposed subdivision – Attachment 2.

APN(s): 011-040-030
Total Area: 12.17 acres

Stonehaven

Number of Dwelling Units: 82 single-family residential dwelling units

Units per acre: 6.74 units per gross acre
Potential population increase: 3.17 persons per household x 82 households = 260 persons Conformance with the R-L-5 Low-Density Residential Zoning Tentative Tract 940 proposes to utilize the small lot provisions, set forth in Section 17.10.100 of the Hanford Municipal Code. In accordance with Section 17.10.100 C., lots having a lot area of less than 3,600 square feet, or lots that do not meet the all standards of Section 17.10.100 may be approved through the planned unit development process, per Chapter 17.82. The proposed development seeks deviation from Section 17.10.100 A. 10, which requires the width of the garage to not exceed 50 percent (50%) of the width of the structure.

An evaluation of the Tentative Tract and Planned Unit Development proposal, as it relates to the standards of the Low-Density Residential zone district, including the small lot provisions, appears below.

Lot Area
Smallest Largest Required in R-L-5
3,600 sq. ft. 7,330 sq. ft. 5,000 sq. ft., 3,600 sq. ft. where utilizing the provisions of Section 17.10.100
In the R-L-5 Low-Density Residential zone district, the minimum lot size shall be 5,000 square feet, except as prescribed in Section 17.10.100, which allows lot area between 3,600 square feet and 4,999 square feet.

Analysis: The minimum lot size provided in Tentative Tract 940 is 3,600 square feet, which is within the allowable minimum allowable, utilizing the provisions set forth in Section 17.10.100.

Lot Dimensions
Lot Frontage
In the R-L-5 Low-Density Residential zone district, the minimum lot frontage shall be 40 feet.

Analysis: There is a minimum of 40 feet of lot frontage provided for all lots within the subdivision.

Lot Width

Stonehaven

In the R-L-5 Low-Density Residential zone district, there shall be a minimum lot width of 50 feet for interior lots and 60 feet for corner lots, except where the provisions of Section 17.10.100 are utilized, lots widths may be forty (40) feet for interior lots and forty-five (45) feet for corner lots.

Analysis: All interior lots are a minimum of 40 feet wide and each corner lot is a minimum of 45 feet wide, which is within the allowable minimum lot width, utilizing the provisions set forth in Section 17.10.100.

Lot Depth
In the R-L-5 Low-Density Residential zone district, the lot depth shall be a minimum of 90 feet, except where the provisions of Section 17.10.100 are utilized, depth can be a minimum of 70 feet.

Analysis: The majority of the lots within the subdivision are upward of 80-feet-deep, but no lot is less than 70 feet deep, which is within the allowable minimum lot depth, utilizing the provisions set forth in Section 17.10.100.

Density
In accordance with the General Plan, the expected density range for Low-Density Residential is two to 10 units per cross acre, with an expected average of four units per gross acre.

Analysis: The density provided for Tentative Tract 940 is 6.74 units per gross acre, which is within the allowable density range for Low-Density Residential.

Dwelling Units per Lot
In the R-L-5 Low-Density Residential zone district, not more than one dwelling unit shall be allowed on each lot, unless approved as an accessory dwelling unit in accordance with Section

17.60.030 (accessory dwelling unit standards) and as permitted by State law.

When utilizing the provisions of Section 17.10.100, each lot shall have only one (1) dwelling unit. Second dwelling units are not permitted. However, State law, allowing accessory dwelling units, would supersede this restriction, until modified.

Analysis: The lots are planned for single-family residential use. Second dwelling units would be permissible with administrative approval, subject to the conditions set forth in 17.60.030 of the Hanford Municipal Code and State law.

Section 17.10.100 Lot Area Less than 5,000 square feet
A. Notwithstanding Section 17.10.030, lots in the R-L-5 zone may have a lot area of between three thousand six hundred (3,600) and four thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine (4,999) square feet if all of the following standards are met:

1. Each lot shall have only one (1) dwelling unit. Second dwelling units are not permitted.

Analysis: As discussed above, State law, allowing accessory dwelling units, would supersede this restriction, until modified. The lots are planned for single-family residential

Stonehaven

use. Second dwelling units would be permissible with administrative approval, subject to the conditions set forth in 17.60.030 of the Hanford Municipal Code and State law.

2. Not more than one hundred fifty (150) lots less than five thousand (5,000) square feet may be approved per tentative subdivision map.

Analysis: Tentative Tract 940 proposes 82 units.

3. Streets shall be constructed to public street standards.’ Analysis: The streets within Tentative Tract 940 will be constructed to City Standard. The interior streets will be designed as City-Standard Residential Streets while the exterior streets will be developed as City-Standard Minor Collectors.

Figure 7: Street Cross-Sections

Stonehaven

4. All structures shall be constructed on site.

Analysis: The applicant proposes all on site construction. Pre-manufactured residences are prohibited, as a condition of approval.

5. Each subdivision with small lots shall have at least three (3) different small lot floor plans with two (2) available elevation designs for each floor plan.

Analysis: The developer, D.R. Horton, proposes three floor plans, each with three available elevation designs. See proposed floor plans and elevations – Attachment 6.

6. The primary frontage of the main structure shall face a public street, primary entryway, circulation walkway, or open space with sidewalks that provide delineated paths of travel.

Analysis: The primary frontage of each residence faces a public street, as required.

7. The primary frontage of the main structure shall include the primary entrance and at least one window.

Analysis: The primary frontage of each residence includes the primary entrance and a window, as required.

8. Required covered parking spaces shall be in garages. Carports are prohibited.

Analysis: Each floor plan proposes a two-car garage, as required.

9. The width of the garage shall not be greater than fifty percent (50%) of the width of the structure.

Analysis: Inconsistent. The width of the garage does exceed 50 percent of the width of the residence, for this reason, the applicant seeks a Planned Unit Development, in order to deviate from the requirements of Section 17.10.100.

10. Main structures shall include a covered front porch at least four (4) feet deep or an uncovered front courtyard at least five (5) feet wide and five (5) feet deep that is surrounded on four (4) sides by the main structure or a wall or fence between three (3) and four (4) feet high.

Analysis: Each floorplan includes the required covered front porch.

11. The Building Official shall not approve a building permit for a new residence on a lot with a lot area less than five thousand (5,000) square feet until the Community Development Director has determined that the standards identified in this section are met.

Analysis: All standards have been verified as part of the Tentative Tract process, with the exception of Section 17.10.100 A. 10, for which a Planned Unit Development is sought to allow deviation. The requirements will be verified during the building permit review phase, additionally.

Stonehaven

B. Lots with less than five thousand (5,000) square feet shall have the following minimum dimensions and building setback areas:

1. The minimum lot depth shall be seventy (70) feet.

Analysis: As analyzed above, all lots satisfy the minimum lot depth.

2. The minimum lot width shall be forty (40) feet for interior lots and forty-five (45) feet for corner lots.

Analysis: As analyzed above, all lots satisfy the minimum lot width for interior and corner lots.

3. The minimum front building setback area shall be twelve (12) feet for livable space and eighteen (18) feet for garages.

Analysis: During the building permit review of the single-family residence, staff will ensure the minimum front setbacks are maintained for the livable space and garage.

4. The minimum rear yard building setback area shall be ten (10) feet for the first story and fifteen (15) feet for upper stories.

Analysis: During the building permit review of the single-family residence, staff will ensure the minimum rear-yard setbacks are maintained. All floor plans are two- stories, therefore, each residence will be required to be setback a minimum of 15 feet from the rear property line.

5. The minimum interior side yard building setback area shall be five (5) feet.

Analysis: During the building permit review of the single-family residence, staff will ensure the minimum interior side setbacks are maintained for the livable space.

6. The minimum corner side yard building setback area shall be ten (10) feet.

Analysis: During the building permit review of the single-family residence, staff will ensure the minimum corner side setbacks are maintained.

7. The maximum building height shall be thirty-five (35) feet.

Analysis: The structures proposes are two-stories, each under 25 feet to the top of the structure.

8. Lots shall provide for a usable open space area of a minimum three hundred (300) square feet. The open space shall be a minimum fifteen (15) feet wide.

Analysis: During the building permit review of the single-family residence and any subsequent accessory structures, staff will ensure adequate open space is maintained for the lots.

Stonehaven

C. Lots having a lot area of less than three thousand six hundred (3,600) square feet, or lots that do not meet the standards in this section may be approved through the planned unit development process per Chapter 17.82.

Analysis: As discussed previously, since the requirement pertaining to garage width, in Section 17.10.100 A. 10 cannot be satisfied, the applicant seeks a Planned Unit Development, in order to deviate from the requirements of Section 17.10.100.

Subdivisions Improvements
Street Improvements
Street improvements will include the following:
- Construction of all streets within the subdivision as residential streets, in conformance with City Standard ST-32.
- Construction of W. Spring Crest and “A” Street as Minor Collector Streets along the development frontage of the subdivision, in conformance with City Standard ST-26, including, but not limited to, the installation of concrete curb and gutter, detached sidewalk, landscaping, streetlights, street paving, and all street signing, striping and a timber barricade at the north end of “A” Street. A minimum of a 12-foot eastbound travel lane (W.

Spring Crest Street) and southbound travel lane (“A” Street) and a four-foot paved shoulder.

Stonehaven

- Installation of street lights throughout the subdivision, in conformance with City Standard GE-56 and Southern California Edison requirements, located as designated by the City Engineer.

Backup Parkway Improvements
The developer will design and construct the following improvements along the development frontages of W. Spring Crest Street and “A” Street for lots backing onto said streets:
a. A minimum six foot high decorative masonry block wall with continuous reinforced concrete footings.
b. A 4 1/2 foot wide attached sidewalk along the development frontages of W. Spring Crest Street and “A” Street.
c. Landscaping and irrigation system improvements along the development frontages of W.

Spring Crest Street and “A” Street, which will be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and reviewed by the City Engineer, the Parks and Recreation, and Community Development Departments
d. A covenant including each residential lot within the subdivision and requiring care and maintenance of local street park strip landscape improvements along the individual lot frontages will be recorded concurrent with the final map Sewer Improvements
The developer’s engineer will provide a sanitary sewer master plan, complete with calculations for the entire subdivision prior to recording a subdivision final map for the development. A six-inch sanitary sewer main is required to be installed throughout the development designed to tie in with the sanitary sewer system with the development along the east boundary. The sanitary sewer tie- in-point is required to be located at the east end of “A” Street, as shown on the tentative map.

Stonehaven

Storm Drainage Improvements
Basin
The developer’s engineer will provide a storm drainage master plan, complete with calculations for the entire subdivision prior to recording a subdivision final map for the development. All drainage from the subdivision is proposed to be retained in the retention basin within the tract to the east, Tentative Tract 937, Billingsly. The basin calculations for Tentative Tract 937 have accounted for storm drain intake from the Stonehaven subdivision and is in conformance with City Standards. The developer will install a storm drain catch basin on W. Spring Crest Street near the east boundary and tie in to existing underground storm drain piping that is stubbed to the east boundary leading to the a storm drain basin.

Water System
The developer’s engineer will provide a Water System Master Plan, complete with calculations for the entire subdivision, prior to recording a subdivision final map for the development.

All existing water wells located within the proposed development will be abandoned, in conformance with State of California Department of Health standards.

Easements and Dedications
All easements will be designated on the final subdivision map, as required by the utility companies and where needed for providing service to streetlights and landscape improvements, as designated by the City Public Utilities and Engineering Division.

Landscape/public utility easements will meet the minimum widths:
a.) “A” Street– Five feet
b.) W. Spring Crest Drive – Five feet
c.) All residential streets – Six feet
Restricted Access
Establishment of a one-foot reservation strip at the end or sides of all streets abutting undeveloped property, to be indicated on the subdivision final map. All access is required to be restricted from lots at the property lines backing onto W. Spring Crest Street and “A” Street, as well as lots 67 through 82 abutting the property to the north.

Stonehaven

Figure 8: Location of Restricted Access (shown in red)
Assessment District
The developer will enter into an agreement with the City for the formation of a community facilities district tax assessment district for the maintenance of interior subdivision street lighting, decorative block fencing, and landscaping located along the property frontages of W. Spring Crest and “A” Streets.

Neighborhood Park
Due to the size of the subdivision, a park is not required, however, the applicant is required to pay park impact fees.

Goal O9: Parks provided at a combined ratio of 3.5 acres per 1,000 residents.

In accordance with the General Plan, open space shall be provided at a ratio of 3.5 acres per 1,000 residents. Using the assumption that the average household is 3.17 persons (based on current census data for Kings County), the projected number of residents for the subdivision is 260 persons, a minimum of 5.25 acres of park space is required for the subdivision.

Stonehaven

Calculation:
82 units x 3.17 persons per household = 259.94 persons, rounded to 260 persons 260 residents ÷ 1,000 = 0.26

0.26 x 3.5 acres = 0.91 acres of park space required
Park spaces of this size are not reimbursable and not able to be counted towards the park requirement; therefore, the development is subject to a park development mitigation impact fee as required by City Municipal Code Section 15.44 and any revisions thereof.

Planned Unit Development No. 13-23
In accordance with Section 17.82.010 of the Hanford Municipal Code, planned unit developments are encouraged to achieve a more functional, aesthetically pleasing, and harmonious living and working environment within the City, that otherwise might not be possible by strict adherence to the provisions of the Hanford Municipal Code. In certain instances, the objectives of the Municipal Code may be achieved by development that does not conform in all respects with the land use pattern designated on the zoning map or in the zone districts prescribed.

PUDs may be utilized to achieve one or more of the following objectives: (a checkmark denotes the applicable objectives sought by the applicant)
- To permit a site within more than one zone district to mix the permitted or conditionally permitted land uses of both zones within the site without regard to the zone district boundary;
✓To permit development intensity greater than would otherwise be permitted by the implementation of the standards of the zone district in which the site is located; ✓To permit the lot patterns on size, shape, and layout that would not otherwise be permitted by the standards of the zone district in which the site is located; - To permit variations to the standard local street cross-sections; - To permit private streets and gated neighborhoods
- To permit the implementation of the mixed use provisions in the MX-N, MX-C, or MX-D zone districts.

As described in the previous section, the proposed subdivision conforms in all aspects to the small lot provisions, set forth in Section 17.10.100, with the exception of condition A. 10, which requires the garage width not to exceed 50% of the width of the residence. Although this standard is not met, the utilization of Section 17.10.100 achieves Goal L8 the General Plan to provide a range of residential building types suitable for a variety of lifestyles, ages, affordability levels, and design options.

Stonehaven

FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL
Annexation No. 162
The Hanford Planning Commission made a finding of consistency for Annexation 162 on September 12, 2023, finding the annexation consistent with General Plan Policy L15 and L17:

Policy L15 Initiation of Annexations
Consider initiation of annexation of land into the City of Hanford only when the following criteria are met:

1. The land is within the Primary Sphere of Influence.

Analysis: The property proposed to be annexed is within the City’s Primary Sphere of Influence, as shown in Attachment 3.

2. The capacity of the water, sewer, fire, school, and police services are adequate to service the area to be annexed, or will be adequate at the time that development occurs.

Analysis: A Plan for Services has been prepared by Engineering for Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Storm Drainage.

Sewer Improvements
The developer’s engineer will provide a sanitary sewer master plan, complete with calculations for the entire subdivision prior to recording a subdivision final map for the development. A six-inch sanitary sewer main is required to be installed throughout the development designed to tie in with the sanitary sewer system with the development along the east boundary. The sanitary sewer tie-in-point is required to be located at the east end of “A” Street, as shown on the tentative map.

Storm Drainage Improvements
The developer’s engineer will provide a storm drainage master plan, complete with calculations for the entire subdivision prior to recording a subdivision final map for the development. All drainage from the subdivision is proposed to be retained in the retention basin within the tract to the east, Tentative Tract 937, Billingsly. The basin calculations for Tentative Tract 937 have accounted for storm drain intake from the Stonehaven subdivision and is in conformance with City Standards. The developer will install a storm drain catch basin on W. Spring Crest Street near the east boundary and tie in to existing underground storm drain piping that is stubbed to the east boundary leading to the a storm drain basin.

Water System
The developer’s engineer will provide a water system master plan, complete with calculations for the entire subdivision, for City review and approval prior to recording a subdivision final map. Provisions will be made for service to future areas of development located adjacent to the subdivision.

Stonehaven

All existing water wells located within the proposed development will be abandoned, in conformance with State of California Department of Health standards.

Fire and Police
Fire and police services are adequate to service the area to be annexed. Impacts to fire and police services will be mitigated through payment of impact fees.

School
Educational services needed for the development of the Project will be provided by the Hanford Elementary School District (HESD) and Hanford Joint Union High School District (HJUHSD). Payment of fees to a school district is considered mitigation for project impacts on school facilities (Government Code Section 65996(a)). Therefore, the project applicant would be required to pay the statutory fees to accommodate the impact of project- generated student.

Notice of the proposed project was sent to the interested agencies for pre-consultation and normal consultation. A response was received by the Hanford Joint Union High School District stating, “This area is within our most impacted school boundary.” The City’s role in development and managing school sites and programs is limited. The various school districts truly govern where a new school site would be located and when it would be necessary to construct or expand facilities, in order to adequately accommodate population growth. Elected governing school boards are responsible for budgeting and decision-making and the State Department of Education establishes school site and construction standards. The General Plan provides policy which focuses on collaboration with school districts in determining new school locations and utilizing school facilities for general public needs. School districts would be able to utilize the General Plan, along with other plans, standards, and codes, to establish new school sites and to make decisions on school amenities and cohesiveness with the surrounding area.

3. Land for development within the City limits is insufficient to meet the current land use needs.

Analysis: The applicant is proposing a 12.17-acre single-family residential development in the southwest planning area. Available land for new development within the Low-Density Residential land use designation is limited in the southwest planning area of the City. The majority of the properties designated for Low-Density Residential development have been developed or entitled, as shown in Figure 6. The proposal is considered an implementation of the General Plan.

4. The territory to be annexed is contiguous to existing developed areas.

Analysis: The territory to be annexed is directly contiguous to the current City limits to the north, east, and west. Tentative Tract 937 was approved by the Planning Commission on January 24, 2023 for the property to the east, APN 011-040-007.

Policy L17 Plan for Services

Stonehaven

Prepare and make publicly available a written Plan for Services that describes how urban services will be provided prior to initiating an annexation.

Analysis: A written Plan for Services is attached (Attachment 4).

Favorable Factors for Annexation
Favorable and unfavorable factors for annexation have been adopted by LAFCO. The existence of favorable or unfavorable factors should not decide approval or denial; however, a substantial number of favorable or unfavorable factors may determine approval or denial of the proposal.

1. The proposed area is close to urban development and municipal-type services and would enhance its potential for full development.

Analysis: The proposed area is close to the existing City limits and is a logical extension of the City. The annexation area can be served by municipal-type services. The annexation area is designated as Low-Density Residential by the General Plan and is necessary to accommodate growth within the City of Hanford. The development proposed for the annexation area is consistent with the General Plan.

2. The proposed annexation conforms to the adopted General Plan.

Analysis: The annexation area is proposed to be developed as a single-family residential subdivision. The subdivision is consistent with the General Plan designation, Low-Density Residential. The annexation is consistent with the General Plan Section 3.2.4, which states, “Annexation of land into Hanford allows previously undeveloped land to become available for development and allows the City of Hanford to provide the territory that is annexed with its full range of City services.” The annexation area is also consistent with Policy L15 and L17 of the General Plan, as analyzed above.

3. The proposed area is consistent with the sphere of influence.

Analysis: The property proposed to be annexed is within the City’s Primary Sphere of Influence, as shown in Attachment 3.

4. The proposed annexation comes with 100% consent of all landowners.

Analysis: There is one parcel proposed to be annexed. The annexation comes with 100% consent the property owners. The consent to annex form is attached – Attachment 5.

Williamson Act Contract
The property is in a Williamson Act Contract that has been protested by the City. The city will not “succeed” the contract for the property that was protested and the contract will be terminated upon annexation.

Prezone No. 0001-23
In accordance with the Hanford Municipal Code Section 17.86.030, before a zone change may be approved, all of the following findings shall be made by the reviewing authority:

Stonehaven

1. That the amendment is internally consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan and the Municipal Code.

Analysis: That Prezone No. 0001-23 is internally consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan, specifically consistent with Land Use Policies L15 and L17. The development proposed in the annexation area, under Tentative Tract 940, conforms with all regulations pertaining to the R-L-5 Low-Density Residential zone district, utilizing the small lot provisions set forth in Section 17.10.100, except where deviation is sought through Planned Unit Development 13-23.

2. That the amendment would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of the community.

ANALYSIS: That this application has been reviewed by County departments, utility companies, City Fire Department, City Building Department, and other involved departments.

Any mitigation required for public health and safety were applied to the proposal and required in the mitigation monitoring and reporting program.

3. That the amendment would maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the City.

Analysis: That jobs-housing balance is achieved by increasing opportunities for people to work and live in close proximity. The ratio is expressed as the number of jobs divided by the number of housing units. The jobs-housing balance is a general tool for analyzing where people work, where they live, and how effectively they can travel between the two. In the planning area, the existing jobs-housing balance ratio in 2013-2014 was 1.17. It is estimated that the implementation of the General Plan would increase the jobs-housing balance by 0.45 to 1.62, which would make the planning area a jobs-rich area. The prezone is considered an implementation of the General Plan, which designates the project site as Low-Density Residential with a “floating” Future Educational Facility designation, not required for this location.

4. That the anticipated land uses on the subject site would be compatible with existing and future surrounding uses.

Analysis: That the anticipated land uses on the subject site are low-density residential, as proposed under Tentative Tract 940 and Planned Unit Development No. 13-23, which are compatible with planned single-family residential developments in the surrounding area (see Figure 6).

Tentative Tract Map 940:

Pursuant to Section 16.04.010 of the Hanford Subdivision Ordinance, Section 66474 of the Subdivision Map Act, and Hanford’s Zoning Ordinance, the following findings can be made by the discretionary body:

1. Consistency Finding:

ANALYSIS: That a consistency finding can be made, because the proposed subdivision map is consistent with the State Subdivision Map Act, General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Ordinance. All lots proposed meet the minimum lot size of the R-L-5 Low- Density Residential Zone District, utilizing the small lot provisions set forth in Section

Stonehaven

17.10.100, which permit minimum lot sizes of 3,600 square feet, with various criteria and application of Planned Unit Development No. 13-23.

2. Design Finding:

ANALYSIS: That the design or improvement of the subdivision is consistent with the State Subdivision Map Act, General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Ordinance. All lots proposed meet the minimum lot size of the R-L-5 Low-Density Residential Zone District, which is 5,000 square feet, except where modified applying the small lot provisions set forth in Section 17.10.100, which permit minimum lot sizes of 3,6000 square feet with various criteria and through application of Planned Unit Development No. 13-23.

All improvements are to be developed in accordance with Public Works Construction Standards.

3. Type of Development Finding:

ANALYSIS: That the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed under Tentative Tract 940. The lots proposed meet the minimum lot size of the R-L-5 Low- Density Residential Zone District, utilizing the small lot provisions set forth in Section

17.10.100 and through application of Planned Unit Development 13-23. All parcels have adequate lot configurations, including street frontage on a public street, required area, width, and depth, as allowed in accordance with Section 17.10.1000 and through application of Planned Unit Development 13-23.

4. Density Finding:

ANALYSIS: That a density finding can be made, because the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. The General Plan prescribes a density range between two and 10 units per acre, with an expected average of four units per gross acre.

The project has a density of 6.17 dwelling units per gross acre.

5. Environmental Finding:

ANALYSIS: That an initial study was conducted. On the basis of the initial study, the Community Development Department has determined that the project described above would not have significant adverse impacts on the environment, with the incorporation of mitigation measures. Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2023-95 has been prepared for the project. The initial study, Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2023-95, and mitigation measures required of development are attached (Attachment 7).

6. Public Health Finding:

ANALYSIS: That the design of the subdivision and type of improvements are not likely to cause serious health problems. The City of Hanford Building Division is responsible for ensuring that future construction of the site follows adopted building codes, thus reducing exposures to accidents to the general public. Consultation was sent for Tentative Tract 940 to interested agencies, including the County Health Department, Public Works Department, Fire Department, and Building Division. Any improvements or mitigations required for public health and safety were applied to the proposal and required in the conditions of approval.

Stonehaven

7. Improvements and Access Findings:

ANALYSIS: That the design of the subdivision and type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision.

As a condition of approval of the Tentative Tract map, the following shall be required:
a. That all easements shall be designated on the subdivision final map as required by the utility companies and where needed for providing service to streetlights and landscape improvements as designated by the City’s Engineer Department. b. That all easements for irrigation ditches and / or irrigation pipelines shall be legally abandoned or relocated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the recording of a subdivision final map.
c. That all proposed landscape/public utility easements, located as shown on the tentative subdivision map, shall be dedicated to the City and be delineated on the final subdivision map. Landscape/public utility easement shall meet or exceed the following minimum widths:
ii. “A” Street– Five feet
iii. W. Spring Crest Drive – Five feet
iv. All residential streets – Six feet
Planned Unit Development No. 13-23
Pursuant to Section 17.82.060 of the Hanford Municipal Code, six findings must be made before approval of the planned unit development application:

1. That the location and design of the planned unit development is in accordance with the purpose of this title.

Analysis: Location - That in accordance with Section 17.82.050 of the Hanford Municipal Code, a planned unit development shall be a minimum five-acre site area, except that there shall be no minimum site area requirements if the site is an infill development site.

The planned unit development pertains to a 12.17-acre parcel.

Design and Purpose - That planned unit developments are encouraged to achieve a more functional, aesthetically pleasing, and harmonious living and working environment within the City, that otherwise might not be possible by strict adherence to the provisions of the municipal code. In certain instances, the objectives of the municipal code may be achieved by development that does not conform in all respects with the land use pattern designated on the zoning map or in the zone district prescribed. The planned unit development seeks to:
✓To permit development intensity greater than would otherwise be permitted by the implementation of the standards of the zone district in which the site is located; ✓To permit the lot patterns on size, shape, and layout that would not otherwise be permitted by the standards of the zone district in which the site is located;

Stonehaven

The design of Planned Unit Development No. 13-23 is consistent with the objectives of Section 17.10.100.

2. That the planned unit development is being proposed to achieve one or more of the objectives identified in Section 17.82.030.

Analysis: That the planned unit development is requested, in order to achieve the following objectives identified in Section 17.82.030:
✓To permit development intensity greater than would otherwise be permitted by the implementation of the standards of the zone district in which the site is located; ✓To permit the lot patterns on size, shape, and layout that would not otherwise be permitted by the standards of the zone district in which the site is located;

3. That the location and design of the planned unit development and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of the community to properties or improvements in the vicinity.

Analysis: Location - That in accordance with Section 17.82.050 of the Hanford Municipal Code, a planned unit development shall be a minimum five-acre site area, except that there shall be no minimum site area requirements if the site is an infill development site.

The planned unit development pertains to a 12.17-acre parcel.

Design – the Tentative Tract and Planned Unit Development have been reviewed for conformance with the requirements of the Hanford Municipal Code for the R-L-5 Low- Density Residential zone district. The development conforms in all aspects with the HMC Section 17.10.100 Small Lot Provisions, lots under 5,000 square feet, with the exception of Section 17.10.100 A. 10, which pertains to restrictions related to the width of the garage for the residence. In accordance with Section 17.10.100 C., where all criteria of Section

17.10.100 cannot be met, the Planned Unit Development provisions may be utilized.

Conditions of Operation – The City of Hanford Building Division is responsible for ensuring that future construction of the site follows adopted building codes, thus reducing exposures to accidents to the general public. The project has been reviewed by the various City departments, including the County Health Department, Public Works Department, Fire Department, and Building Division. Any improvements required for public health and safety were applied to the proposal and required in the conditions of approval.

4. That the location and design of the planned unit development will not generate more traffic than the streets in the vicinity can carry without congestion and will not overload utilities.

Analysis: The project has been reviewed by the Public Works Department and improvements and conditions of approval and mitigation measures have been placed on the project in order to mitigate the effects of the project on traffic, streets, and utilities.

5. That the planned unit development’s population density, site area and dimensions, site coverage, yard spaces, height of structures, distances between structures, off-street parking and off-street loading facilities, landscaped areas and street design will produce an environment of stable and desired character consistent with the purpose of this title.

Stonehaven

Analysis: The Tentative Tract and Planned Unit Development have been reviewed for conformance with the requirements of the Hanford Municipal Code for the R-L-5 Low- Density Residential zone district. The development conforms in all aspects with the HMC Section 17.10.100 Small Lot Provisions, lots under 5,000 square feet, with the exception of Section 17.10.100 A. 10, which pertains to restrictions related to the width of the garage for the residence. In accordance with Section 17.10.100 C., where all criteria of Section

17.10.100 cannot be met, the Planned Unit Development provisions may be utilized. The project will produce an environment of stable and desired character consistent with the purpose of this title.

6. That the combination of different dwelling types, architectural appearance, and/or varieties of land uses in the development will complement each other and harmonize with the existing and proposed land uses in the vicinity.

ANALYSIS: The development conforms in all aspects with the HMC Section 17.10.100 Small Lot Provisions, lots under 5,000 square feet, with the exception of Section 17.10.100 A. 10, which pertains to restrictions related to the width of the garage for the residence. In accordance with Section 17.10.100 C., where all criteria of Section 17.10.100 cannot be met, the Planned Unit Development provisions may be utilized. The project achieves Goal L8 of the General Plan to provide a range of residential building types suitable for a variety of lifestyles, ages, affordability levels, and design options. The combination of architectural appearance will compliment each other and will provide cohesive design with the single- family residential tract located to the east, proposed to be developed by the same developer, D.R. Horton.

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
That an initial study/environmental assessment was conducted; and, on the basis on the initial study, the Community Development Department has determined that the project described above would not have significant adverse impacts on the environment, with the incorporation of mitigation measures. Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2023-95 (SCH #2023080269) has been prepared for the project. The initial study, Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2023-95, and mitigation measures required of development are attached as Attachment 7.

PRE-CONSULTATION
In accordance with Section 15603(g) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the project proposal was forwarded to the responsible and interested agencies for early consultation. Comments were received from the following agencies:
a. Pacific Gas and Electric Company – Received July 27, 2023, July 28, 2023 b. AT&T – Received July 28, 2023
c. Hanford Joint Union High School District – Received July 31, 2023 d. Southern California Edison – Received July 31, 2023
e. Department of Transportation, Caltrans – August 7, 2023 The comments received and a response to comments is included in the initial study and attached – Attachment 8.

Stonehaven

CONSULTATION
In accordance with Section 15073 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, a notice of intent to adopt a mitigated negative declaration was sent to the concerned agencies and published on OPR’s CEQANet website on August 8, 2023. No comments were received.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
Notice of the public hearing and notice of the intent to adopt a mitigated negative declaration was noticed in the Hanford Sentinel on August 11, 2023 and mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the project site on August 10, 2023. No written comments were received.

During Planning Commission on September 12, 2023:

One person spoke in favor of the project:

1. Matthew Chavez – Forward Planner DR Horton

Notice of the public hearing before the City Council and the notice of intent to adopt a mitigated negative declaration was noticed in the Hanford Sentinel on September 23, 2023 and mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the project site on September 22, 2023. No comments have been received, as of the date of preparation of this report.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Certify Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2023-95 for the project to the City Council.

2. Introduce and waive the first reading Ordinance. 23-06, approving Prezone No. 0001-23.

3. Adopt Resolution 23-36-R, initiating proceedings for Annexation 162 and direct staff to file the appropriate forms with the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) of Kings County.

4. Adopt Resolution 23-37-R, approving Tentative Tract 940.

5. Adopt Resolution 23-38-R, approving Planned Unit Development 13-23.

Owner:

Rick and Donna Thomas
16826 Hanford-Armona Road
Lemoore, CA 93245
Applicant:

Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group
Jarred Olsen, Environmental Project Manager
(559) 636-1166
D.R. Horton CA-3, Inc.
419 W. Murray Avenue

Stonehaven

Visalia, CA 93291

CC Ordinance Prezone 0001-23, Page 1 of 3
ORDINANCE NO. 23-06
PREZONE NO. 0001-23

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HANFORD PREZONING

CERTAIN PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF HANFORD FROM COUNTY ZONING AL-10 LIMITED AGRICULTURE TO R-L-5 LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN. THE PROJECT IS LOCATED IN THE SOUTH OF HANFORD ARMONA ROAD, BETWEEN 12TH AND 13TH AVENUES (APN011-040-030) .

The City Council of the City of Hanford does ordain as follows:

Section 1: The followi ng described territory situated in the City of Hanford is hereby prezoned under the terms of Chapter 17.86 of the Hanford Municipal Code:

Annexation 162 filed by D.R. Horton
FRO
M: County zoning of AL-10 Limited Agriculture
TO: City zoning R-L-5 Low-Density Residential
On
property described as follows:

Al
l that certain real property, situate in the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 3 of Township 19 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Base & Meridian, in the County of Kings, State of California, described as follows:

BE
GINNING at an angle point in the existing City Limit line of the City of Hanford, said point being the Southwest corner of the East 21.12 acres of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 3, and being on the North line of Parcel 2 of that Parcel Map recorded in Book 5 of Parcel Maps at Page 72, Kings County Records; thence

1. Nor
th 89°36’26” West, along the North line of said Parcel 2 and continuing along the North line of Parcel 1 of said Parcel Map, 707.68 feet, more or less, to the Northwest corner of said Parcel 1, being a point on the West line of the East half of said Northwest quarter of Section 3; thence

2. Nor
th 0°46’46” East, along said West line, 261.95 feet, more or less, to the Southeast corner of that parcel described in Doc. 2001999, Official Records of Kings County, being an angle point in said existing City Limit line; thence along said existing City Limit Line the following three (3) courses:

3. Nor
th 0°46’46” East, along said West line, 488.40 feet, more or less, to the Southwest corner of the North 819.06 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 3; thence

4. Sout
h 89°24’13” East, along the South line of the North 819.06 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 3, a distance of 707.66 feet, more or less, to the West line of the East 21.12 acres of said Northeast quarter; thence

5. Sout
h 0°46’46” West, along last said West line, 747.83 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING conta
ining approximately 12.17 acres, as depicted in attached Exhibit A; and Sec
tion 2: The Council does hereby find as a fact that this Ordinance has been recommended for passage by the Planning Commission of the City of Hanford after public hearing before the Planning

CC Ordinance Prezone 0001-23, Page 2 of 3

Commission after notice required by Section 17.70.100 of the Hanford Municipal Code and Government Code Section 65854. The City Council finds that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2023-95 is approved, in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act. The City Council hereby finds that the prezoning is required to achieve the objectives of the zoning regulations as set forth in Section 17.06.010 of the Hanford Municipal Code, an d that this Ordinance has been introduced by the City Council after public hearing held on the 3
rd day of October, 2023 at 7:00 p.m. of said day after notice required under the provisions of Section 65856 of the Government Code.

Section 3: This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its passage, and shall be published once in the Hanford Sentinel within fifteen (15) days after its passage, and the zoning will apply to such property in the event of subsequent annexation to the City under the provisions of Section 65859 of the Government Code.

Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford duly called and held on the ____ day of ________, by the following roll call vote:

ATTEST:

Natalie Corral

APPROVED

_________________________
MAYOR of the City of Hanford

CITY CLERK

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF KINGS ) ss

CITY OF HANFORD )

I, NATALIE CORRAL, City Clerk of the City of Hanford, do hereby certify the foregoing ordinance was duly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford on the 3 rd day of October, 2023 and it was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford held on the _______ day of ______________, 2023.

Dated: _____________________ _____________________________

Natalie Corral
City Clerk

CC Ordinance Prezone 0001-23, Page 3 of 3

Exhibit A
Prezone No. 0001-23

Prezone 0001-23
Proposed: R-L-5 Low-Density Residential (property outlined in bold)

RESOLUTION NO. 23-36-R

A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY OF HANFORD REQUESTING THE

LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION NO. 162, A REQUEST TO ANNEX APPROXIMATELY 12.17ACRES OF

UNINCORPORATED KINGS COUNTY LAND INTO THE CITY OF HANFORD FOR PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF HANFORD ARMONA ROAD, BETWEEN 12TH AND 13TH AVENUES (APN011-040-030)
RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hanford on October 3, 2023, that WHEREAS, the City of Hanford desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to the Cortese -Knox- Hertzberg Local Reorganization Act of 2000, Division 3, commencing with Section 5600 of the California Government Code, an affected City, as defined therein, may by resolution adopted by its legislative body make a proposal for a change of organization and request initiation of proceedings thereon; and WHEREAS, notice of intent to adopt this resolution of application has been given, and this Council has conducted a public hearing based upon this notification; and WHEREAS, the principal reasons for the proposed annexation are as follows:

1. The land will be within the Primary Sphere of Influence.

2. The capacity of the water, sewer, fire, school, and police services are adequate to service the area to be annexed, or will be adequate at the time that development occurs.

3. Land for development within the City limits is insufficient to meet the current land use needs.

4. The territory to be annexed is contiguous to existing developed areas.

WHEREAS, the following agency would be affected by the proposed jurisdictional changes:

Agency Nature of Change
City of Hanford Annexation
WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed is uninhabited, and a map and description of the boundaries of the territory are attached hereto as Exhibits A (annexation map) and B (legal description) and by this reference incorporated herein, and,
WHEREAS, the proposal is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Hanford; and WHEREAS, it is desired to provide that the proposed annexation be subject to the following terms and conditions:

1. That the annexation area be prezoned R-L-5 Low -Density Residential , in accordance with the General Plan.

2. That the Williamson Act contract be cancelled upon annexation into the City limits.

WHEREAS, this proposal will be consistent with the spheres of influence for all agencies which would be affected by the annexation; and
WHEREAS, The Council certified that an Initial Study was prepared for the project, consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act; and
WHEREAS, the City Council determined that the project would not result in significant impacts to the environment with the incorporation of mitigation measures and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2023- 95 was adopted and mitigations measures required, as included in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, shown in Exhibit C.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Resolution of Application is hereby adopted and approved by the City Council of the City of Hanford and the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kings County is hereby requested to take proceedings of the annexation of territory as authorized in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford held on the 3rd day of October 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: Council Member ________________________ ________________________
________________________
________________________
________________________
NOES: Council Member ________________________ ABSTAIN: Council Member ________________________ ABSENT: Council Member ________________________ __________________________________________

MAYOR

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF KINGS )

CITY OF HANFORD ) SS

I, Natalie Corral, City Clerk of the City of Hanford, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Hanford at a regular meeting thereof held on the 3rd day of October, 2023.

Dated: ______________________
__________________________________
City Clerk

Exhibit A
Annexation Map

▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲▲
▲
▲
▲
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲
▲▲▲▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲▲
▲
▲
▲
▲▲
▲
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 3, OF TOWNSHIP 19 SOUTH, RANGE 21 EAST,

MOUNT DIABLO BASE & MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF KINGS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

POINT OF BEGINNING
For assessment purposes only. This description of land is not a legal property description as defined in the
Subdivision Map Act and may not be used as the
basis for an offer for sale of the land described.

HANFORD-ARMONA ROAD
APN 011-040-030

NW CORNER,
SEC. 3-19/21
SITE

HANFORD-ARMONA RD

NOT TO SCALEVICINITY MAP

HOUSTON AVE
13TH
AVE
S.R. 198

CITYOFHANFORD

COUNTYOFKINGS
LEGEND

COURSE NUMBER

EXISTING CITY LIMITS LINE

PROPOSED ANNEXATION AREA
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

ANNEXATION AREA

12.17 ACRES

CITY LIMITS LINE

CITY LIMITS LINE
N 1/4 CORNER,
SEC. 3-19/21
5-PM-72

CITYOFHANFORD

COUNTYOFKINGS
PCL. 2
PCL. 1
DOC. 2001999, O.R.K.C.

B.505, P.262, O.R.K.C.
15-PM-79
"EAST 21.12 ACRESOF
NE
1 4OF NW
1 4, SEC. 3"
4/27/23

Exhibit B
Legal Description

ANNEXATION NO. ____

TO THE CITY OF HANFORD

GEOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION
All that certain real property, situate in the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 3 of Township 19 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Base & Meridian, in the County of Kings, State of California, described as follows:

BEGINNING at an angle point in the existing City Limit line of the City of Hanford, said point being the Southwest corner of the East 21.12 acres of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 3, and being on the North line of Parcel 2 of that Parcel Map recorded in Book 5 of Parcel Maps at Page 72, Kings County Records; thence 1) North 89°36’26” West, along the North line of said Parcel 2 and continuing along the North line of Parcel 1 of said Parcel Map, 707.68 feet, more or less, to the Northwest corner of said Parcel 1, being a point on the West line of the East half of said Northwest quarter of Section 3; thence
2) North 0°46’46” East, along said West line, 261.95 feet, more or less, to the Southeast corner of that parcel described in Doc. 2001999, Official Records of Kings County, being an angle point in said existing City Limit line; thence along said existing City Limit Line the following three (3) courses:
3) North 0°46’46” East, along said West line, 488.40 feet, more or less, to the Southwest corner of the North 819.06 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 3; thence
4) South 89°24’13” East, along the South line of the North 819.06 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 3, a distance of 707.66 feet, more or less, to the West line of the East 21.12 acres of said Northeast quarter; thence 5) South 0°46’46” West, along last said West line, 747.83 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Containing approximately 12.17 acres.

For assessment purposes only. This description of land is not a legal property description as defined in the Subdivision Map Act and may not be used as the basis for an offer for sale of the land described. 4/27/23

Exhibit C
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Chapter 5-Mitigation, Monitoring, & Reporting Program
Stonehaven Subdivision
May 2023 5-1

CHAPTER 5MITIGATION,

MONITORING, AND REPORTING

PROGRAM
This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMR P) has been formulated based upon the findings of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/ MND) for the Project in the City of Hanford. The MMRP lists mitigation measures recommended in the IS/MND for the Project and identifies monitoring and reporting requirements.

Table 5-1: Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program presents the mitigation measures identified for the Project. Each mitigation measure is numbered with a symbol indicating the topical section to which it pertains, a hyphen, and the impact number. For example, AIR-2 would be the second mitigation measure identified in the Air Quality analysis of the IS/MND.

The first column of Table 5-1: Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program identifies the mitigation measure. The second column, entitled “When Monitoring is to Occur,” identifies the time the mitigation measure should be initiated. The third column, “Frequency of Monitoring,” identifies the frequency of the monitoring of the mitigation measure. The fourth column, “Agency Responsible for Monitoring,” names the party ultimately responsible for ensuring that the mitigation measure is implemented. The last columns will be used by the Lead and Responsible Agencies to ensure that individual mitigation measures have been complied with and monitored.

Chapter 5-Mitigation, Monitoring, & Reporting Program
Stonehaven Subdivision
May 2023 5-2
Table 5-1: Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program
Item Mitigation Measure
When
Monitoring is to
Occur
Frequency of
Monitoring
Agency
Responsible for
Monitoring
Method to Verify
Compliance
Verification of
Compliance
Agricultural and Forestry Resources
AG-1 That a right-to farm provision be recorded with
the recording of the final subdivision map to
ensure that future resi dents of the homes in
the project area are aware of the adjacent
agricultural uses and their right to continue to
operate.

With the
recording of the
final subdivision
map
Once City of Hanford Recorded Disclosure
Agreement
AG-2 Prior to development, the Williamson Act
Contract shall be cancelled and applicable
cancellation fees shall be paid to the County
Treasure in accordance with Government Code
Section 51283(b). In th e event that the City
exercises the option of not succeeding to the
Contract pursuant to Government Code
Section 51243.5(d), and such action is
approved by the Local Agency Formation
Commission, the Contract will be terminated,
no cancellation is required, and no cancellation
fees are required to be paid.

Prior to
construction Once City of Hanford Contract Termination
Documents
Biological Resources
BIO-1 ((AAvoidance)): The Project’s construction
activities will occur, if feasible, between
September 16 and January 31 (outside of the
Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Once City of Hanford Construction Schedule

Chapter 5-Mitigation, Monitoring, & Reporting Program
Stonehaven Subdivision
May 2023 5-3
Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program
Item Mitigation Measure
When
Monitoring is to
Occur
Frequency of
Monitoring
Agency
Responsible for
Monitoring
Method to Verify
Compliance
Verification of
Compliance
nesting bird season) to avoid impacts to
nesting birds.

BIO-2 ((PPre--cconstruction Survey)): If activities must occur within the nesting bird season (February
1 to September 15), a qualified biologist will
conduct a pre -construction survey for
Swainson’s Hawk nests onsite and within a 0.5-
mile radius. The pre-construction survey would
also provide a presence/absence survey for all
other nesting birds within the APE, no more
than seven (7) days prior to the start of
construction. All raptor nests would be
considered “active” upon the nest -building
stage.

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Once City of Hanford Submittal of Pre-
Construction Survey
BIO-3 ((EEstablish Buffers)): On discovery of any active nests near work areas, the biologist will
determine appropriate construction setback
distances based on applicable CDFW and/or
USFWS guidelines and/or the biology of the
species in question. If necessary, construction
buffers will be identified with flagging, fencing,
or other easily visibl e means, and will be
maintained until the biologist has determined
that the nestlings have fledged.

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Once City of Hanford Report from Biologist
BIO-4 ((CConsultation with CDFW)): In the event an
active Swainson’s Hawk nest, or other nest is
detected during surveys and could be
impacted by the Projec t, consultation with
CDFW will be warranted to discuss how to
implement the Project and avoid impacts to
the nest.

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Once City of Hanford Report from Biologist

Chapter 5-Mitigation, Monitoring, & Reporting Program
Stonehaven Subdivision
May 2023 5-4
Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program
Item Mitigation Measure
When
Monitoring is to
Occur
Frequency of
Monitoring
Agency
Responsible for
Monitoring
Method to Verify
Compliance
Verification of
Compliance
BIO-5 ((PPre--CConstruction Survey)): A pre-construction survey will be performe d within five days of
building and tree removal. A qualified biologist
will inspect the building s and trees for active
roosts. If the building or trees are determined
to be clear of bats, they will be removed within
five days.

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Once City of Hanford Report from Biologist
BIO-6 ((EEstablissh Buffers)): On discovery of any roosts in the APE, a qualified biologist will determine
appropriate construction setback distances.

Buffer will be removed once a qualified
biologist had determined the bat roosts are no
longer occupied.

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Once City of Hanford Report from Biologist
BIO-7 ((PPassive Relocation)): On discovery of any bat
roosts outside of the maternity roosting season
or overwintering season (September 1 to
November 30), bats may be passively relocated
from the roosts by a qualified biologist in
accordance with a bat relocation plan prepared
for the Project site by a qualified biologist. The
bat relocation plan shall include the methods
to be used to safely exclude bats from the roost
and prevent reentry.

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Once City of Hanford Report from Biologist
Cultural Resources
CUL-1 That a Burial Treatment Plan be entered to by
the applicant/property owner prior to any
earth disturbing activities.

Prior to earth-
disturbing
activities
Once City of Hanford Executed Plan
CUL-2 Should archaeological remains or artifacts be
unearthed during any stage of project
activities, work in the area of discovery shall
cease until the area is evaluated by a qualified
archaeologist. If mitigation is warranted, the
During
construction
activities
Continuously City of Hanford
Qualified
Archaeologist
Report

Chapter 5-Mitigation, Monitoring, & Reporting Program
Stonehaven Subdivision
May 2023 5-5
Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program
Item Mitigation Measure
When
Monitoring is to
Occur
Frequency of
Monitoring
Agency
Responsible for
Monitoring
Method to Verify
Compliance
Verification of
Compliance
project proponent shall abide by
recommendations of the archaeologist.

CUL-3 In the event that any human remains are
discovered on the Project site, the Kings
County Coroner must be notified of the
discovery (California Health and Safety Code,
Section 7050.5) and all activities in the
immediate area of the find or in any nearby
area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent
human remains must ce ase until appropriate
and lawful measures have been implemented.

If the Coroner determines that the remains are
not recent, but rather of Native American
origin, the Coroner shall notify the Native
American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in
Sacramento within 24 hours to permit the
NAHC to determine the Most Likely
Descendent of the deceased Native American.

During
construction
activities
Continuously City of Hanford
City of Hanford with
assistance of County
Coroner

Geology and Soils
GEO-1 Should paleontological resources be
encountered on the Project site, all ground
disturbing activities in the area shall stop. A
qualified paleontologist shall be contacted to
assess the discovery. Mi tigation may include
monitoring, recording the fossil locality, data
recovery and analysis, a final report. Public
educational outreach may also be appropriate.

Upon completion of the assessment, a report
documenting methods, findings, and
recommendations shall be prepared and
submitted to the City of Hanford for review,
and (if paleontological materials are
recovered) a paleontological repository, such
During
construction
activities
Continuously City of Hanford
Qualified
Paleontologist
Report

Chapter 5-Mitigation, Monitoring, & Reporting Program
Stonehaven Subdivision
May 2023 5-6
Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program
Item Mitigation Measure
When
Monitoring is to
Occur
Frequency of
Monitoring
Agency
Responsible for
Monitoring
Method to Verify
Compliance
Verification of
Compliance
as the University of California Museum of
Paleontology.

Tribal Cultural Resources
TRC-1 ((Tribal Cultural Resource Presentation): Due to Tribal history and knowledge of the project
area, the Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut
Tribe has concerns and is requesting to be
retained for a cultural sensitivity awareness
presentation to all construction staff of the
Project, prior to start of construction activities.

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Continuously City of Hanford City of Hanford
Presentation
TRC-2 ((TTribal Cultural Monitoring)): An approved
Tribal Monitor shall be retained to be on site to
monitor during all project -related ground-
disturbing construction activities within the
Cultural APE (i.e., grading, excavation, etc.).

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Continuously City of Hanford City of Hanford
TRC-3 ((Curation of Archaeological Collections): A
curation agreement shall be entered into with
the Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe,
materials and documents would be
professionally curated as outlined in
agreement and made available to other
archaeologists or researchers for further study.

The collections and associated records shall be
transferred, to an appropriate curation facility
as outlined in agreement with Santa Rosa
Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe, to be
accompanied by payment.

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Continuously City of Hanford City of Hanford

RESOLUTION 23-37-R

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HANFORD APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT 940, A REQUEST, BY D.R. HORTON, TO SUBDIVIDE THE 12.17 ACRES PROPOSED TO BE PREZONED R-L-5 LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL INTO 82

SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS WITH A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY. THE PROJECT IS LOCATED SOUTH OF HANFORD ARMONA ROAD, BETWEEN 12TH AND 13TH AVENUES (APN 011-040-030)
At a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford duly called and held on October 3, 2023, by motion of Councilmember , and seconded by Councilmember , and duly carried, the following resolution was adopted:

WHEREAS, Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No.940, filed by DR Horton, a request to subdivide the 12.17 acres proposed to be prezoned R -L-5 Low-Density Residential into 82 single-family residential lots , with a Planned Unit Development overlay, as shown in Exhibit A, has been reviewed by the City Council of the City of Hanford , in accordance with Title 16 of the Hanford Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has carefully considered recommendations and testimony presented at the public hearing of October 3, 2023, and WHEREAS, all affected public utility companies, various governmental department agencies, staff, and the City Council, have given careful consideration to this tentative subdivision map and have made recommendations thereon; and
WHEREAS, the Initial Study, Mitigated N egative D eclaration N o. 2023-95, and all notices related thereto were prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City of Hanford Municipal Code and Policies; and WHEREAS, the City Council has made the following findings , pursuant to Section

16.04.010 of the Hanford Subdivision Ordinance, Section 66474 of the Subdivision Map Act and Hanford’s Zoning Ordinance:

Tentative Tract 940

1. Consistency Finding:

ANALYSIS: That a consistency finding can be made, because the proposed subdivision map is consistent with the State Subdivision Map Act, General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Ordinance. All lots proposed meet the minimum lot size of the R -L-5 Low-Density Residential Zone District, utilizing the small lot provisions set forth in Section 17.10.100, which permit minimum lot sizes of 3,600 square feet, with various criteria and application of Planned Unit Development No. 13-23.

2. Design Finding:

ANALYSIS: That the design or improvement of the subdivision is consistent with the State Subdivision Map Act, General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Ordinance. All lots proposed meet the minimum lot size of the R-L-5 Low-Density Residential Zone District, which is 5,000 square feet, except where modified applying the small lot provisions set forth in Section

17.10.100, which permit minimum lot sizes of 3,6000 square feet with various criteria and through application of Planned Unit Development No. 13- 23. All improvements are to be developed in accordance with Public Works Construction Standards.

3. Type of Development Finding:

ANALYSIS: That the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed under Tentative Tract 940. The lots proposed meet the minimum lot size of the R -L-5 Low -Density Residential Zone District, utilizing the small lot provisions set forth in Section 17.10.100 and through application of Planned Unit Development 13- 23. All parcels have adequate lot configurations, including street frontage on a public street, required area, width, and depth, as allowed in accordance with Section 17.10.1000 and through application of Planned Unit Development 13-23.

4. Density Finding:

ANALYSIS: That a density finding can be made, because the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. The General Plan prescribes a density range between two and 10

Tentative Tract 940

units per acre, with an expected average of four units per gross acre. The project has a density of

6.17 dwelling units per gross acre.

5. Environmental Finding:

ANALYSIS: That an initial study was conducted. On the basis of the initial study, the Community Development Department has determined that the project described above would not have significant adverse impacts on the environment, with the incorporation of mitigation measures.

Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2023-95 has been prepared for the project.

6. Public Health Finding:

ANALYSIS: That the design of the subdivision and type of improvements are not likely to cause serious health problems. The City of Hanford Building Division is responsible for ensuring that future construction of the site follows adopted building codes, thus reducing exposures to accidents to the general public. Consultation was sent for Tentative Tract 940 to interested agencies, including the County Health Department, Public Works Department, Fire Department, and Building Division. Any improvements or mit igations required for public health and safety were applied to the proposal and required in the conditions of approval.

7. Improvements and Access Findings:

ANALYSIS: That the design of the subdivision and type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision.

As a condition of approval of the Tentative Tract map, the following shall be required:

a. That all easements shall be designated on the subdivision final map as required by the utility companies and where needed for providing service to streetlights and landscape improvements as designated by the City’s Engineer Department.

Tentative Tract 940

b. That all easements for irrigation ditches and / or irrigation pipelines shall be legally abandoned or relocated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the recording of a subdivision final map.

c. That all proposed landscape/public utility easements, located as shown on the tentative subdivision map, shall be dedicated to the City and be delineated on the final subdivision map.

Landscape/public utility easement shall meet or exceed the following minimum widths:

ii. “A” Street– Five feet
iii. W. Spring Crest Drive – Five feet
iv. All residential streets – Six feet

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council finds that no significant environmental impacts would result from the proposed project with the incorporation of mitigation measures, adopts a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, attached as Exhibit B, and certifies that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2023-95 was prepared consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines and City of Hanford Environmental Guidelines.

THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hanford hereby approves Tentative Tract 940, subject to the conditions of approval, attached as Exhibit C, and the following:

1. That this tentative subdivision map becomes null and void after 24 months has elapsed from the date of approval, if the above conditions have not been satisfied or bonded for, and a final map recorded. A time extension may be granted by the approving body upon written request by the applicant. The time extension, if approved, will be subject to the improvement standards and fees in effect at the time the time the extension for the tentative subdivision map is granted.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford held on the 3
rd day of October, 2023 by the following vote:

Tentative Tract 940

AYES: Council Member ________________________
________________________
________________________
________________________
________________________
NOES: Council Member ________________________ ABSTAIN: Council Member ________________________ ABSENT: Council Member ________________________

__________________________________________
MAYOR

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF KINGS )

CITY OF HANFORD ) SS

I, Natalie Corral, City Clerk of the City of Hanford, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Hanford at a regular meeting thereof held on the 3
rd day of October, 2023.

Dated: ______________________
__________________________________
City Clerk

Tentative Tract 940

Exhibit A:

Tentative Tract 940

11 1
15 14
10 29
8 23
28 32
12 27
16 34
33 9
17 26
2 30
7 4
25 31
5 24
50 43
35 36 37
49 44
38 45
39 46
40 47
41 48
42 52
65 5451
5966
58 60
57 61
56 62
55 63
8180797877767574737271706967
53 64
22 181921
68 82
3 6
20 13
SECTION1-MINORCOLLECTORSECTION

NOTTOSCALE
12'

CMUBLOCKWALL

LANDSCAPINGEASEMENT/PUE
14' 20'
4'-6" 6"
5'
PL/
ROW
PERCITYSTDST-26
4' 4'
6' 6' 2'
34' PL
68'

PAVEDSHOULDER

DIRTSHOULDER
12'
BY
OTHERS
22'
SLOPEEASEMENT:

GRADEDSWALE
W/5:1SLOPE
FUTURE
2%-3%2%-3%
PL

NOTTOSCALE
7'-6"4'-6"
60'
12'1818'
6"
SECTION2-TYPICALRESIDENTIALSECTION
PL PL
PERCITYSTDST-23
LICENSENO:

DESIGNENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOBNO:

DRAFTEDBY:CHECKEDBY:

OF

ORIGINALSCALESHOWNISONE
INCH.ADJUSTSCALEFOR
REDUCEDORENLARGEDPLANS.
01"
PHASE:

PROJECTNO:

STONEHAVEN
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISON MAP 940

DR HORTON HOMES

HANFORD, CA
TTM

COVER SHEET

ADAMOJEDA
C79842
NJLAAO
8/10/2023
159422003
159422003
TTM1
12 8/10/2023 2:12 PM G:\DR Horton - 1594\159422003-Stonehaven\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\08_TTM\TTM1 COVER SHEET.dwg -Erasmo Garcia 03060120

SCALEINFEET
SITEMAP 1"=60'

VICINITYMAP NOTTOSCALE

PROJECTLOCATION

HOUSTONAVENUE
198

HANFORD
13TH AVENUE
12TH AVENUE

HANFORARMONARD
FOR
REVIEW
ONLY

PROPERTYDIVISIONCERTIFICATE
"IHEREBYAPPLYFORAPPROVALOFTHEDIVISIONOFTHEREALPROPERTY

SHOWNINTHISPLATANDCERTIFYTHATIAMTHELEGALOWNER(ORAUTHORIZED

AGENTOFTHELEGALOWNER)OFTHEPROPERTYANDTHATTHEINFORMATION

SHOWNHEREONISTRUEANDCORRECTTOTHEBESTOFMYKNOWLEDGEAND
BELIEF".

SIGNATURE

ADDRESS

CAPACITY

GENERALNOTES
·APN:011-040-030
·SITEAREA:12.17AC
·SITEDRAINAGE:COLLECTEDINBILLINGSLEYBASINVIACURBINLETS
·TRASHCOLLECTION:CITYOFHANFORD
·SEWERAGE:CITYOFHANFORD
·WATER:CITYOFHANFORD
·NATURALGAS:THEGASCOMPANY
·TELEPHONE:SBC
·POWER:SOUTHERNCALIFORNIAEDISON
·CABLETV:CHARTER
·FIREPROTECTION:CITYOFHANFORDFIREDEPARTMENT
·FLOODZONE:X
·ZONINGSETBACKSFORR-L-5:

FRONT:12FEETFORLIVINGSPACE,AND18FEETFORGARAGES
CORNER:10FEET
REAR:10FEETTOFIRSTSTORY;15FEETTOUPPERSTORIES
INTERIORSIDE:5FEET

FLOODZONEINFORMATION

ASSHOWNONTHEFEDERALEMERGENCYMANAGEMENTAGENCY'S
FLOODINSURANCERATEMAP,PANELNUMBER06031C0195C,FOR
COMMUNITYNO.060086,KINGSCOUNTYUNINCORPORATEDAREAS,
EFFECTIVEJUNE16,2009.THEPROPERTYLIESINTHEZONEXAREA
(UNSHADED).

BASISOFBEARING
THENORTHLINEOFTHENORTHWESTQUARTEROFSECTION3-19/21,
M.D.B.&M.,TAKENASSOUTH89°24'13"EAST,ASMEASUREDBYRTKGPS
OBSERVATIONSTIEDTOLEICASMARTNETREALTIMENETWORK.

LEGALDESCRIPTION
THESOUTH11.81ACRESOFTHEWEST25.08ACRESOFTHE
NORTHEASTQUARTEROFTHENORTHWESTQUARTEROFSECTION3,
TOWNSHIP19SOUTH,RANGE21EAST,MOUNTDIABLOBASEAND
MERIDIAN.

PROJECTBENCHMARK
CITYOFHANFORDBENCHMARK#173,ABRASSCAP1FOOTEASTOFEAST

CURBRETURNATSOUTHEASTRETURNOFTHEINTERSECTIONOF
HANFORD-ARMONAROADANDGREENBRIERDRIVE.

ELEVATION=230.476'CITYOFHANFORDDATUM(2021)

SUBDIVIDERSTATEMENT
·GENERALPLAN:LOWDENSITYRESIDENTIAL
·CURRENTZONING:AE-20(KINGSCOUNTYTOBEANNEXEDINTOHANFORD) ·PROPOSEDZONING:R-L-5
·EXISTINGUSE:AGRICULTURE
·PROPOSEDUSE:LOWDENSITYRESIDENTIAL
·TOTALLOTS:82
·LOTAREA:3,600MIN/7,330MAX
·DENSITY:6.73UNITS/GROSSAC
·STREETLIGHTINGTOBEINSTALLEDPERCITYOFHANFORDSTANDARDS
·GROSSAREA:12.17ACRES.

SURVEYNOTES
·TOPOGRAPHYSHOWNWASCOLLECTEDBYPROVOST&PRITCHARD

CONSULTINGGROUPDURINGAFIELDSURVEYCONDUCTEDIN
OCTOBEROF2021.
·THEHISTORICDEEDSFORTHESUBJECTPROPERTYANDOTHER
PROPERTIESINTHENORTHEAST1/4OFTHENORTHWEST1/4OF
SECTION3,T.19S.,R.21E.,M.D.B.&M.,HAVEUSEDACREAGEAND

DIMENSIONTOGETHERANDINTERCHANGEABLYFORTHE
DESCRIPTIONOFTHEDIVISIONSOFTHIS1/4-1/4SECTION,WITH

DIMENSIONSAPPEARINGTOALIGNWITHUSEANDOCCUPATIONAND

REMAININGCONSISTENTINDEEDSANDEASEMENTSBYANDBETWEEN

THELANDOWNERS,WHILEACREAGEOFPARCELSINLEGAL
DESCRIPTIONSAPPEARTOBEAPPROXIMATEONLY.

DRHORTONHOMES

HANFORD,CA

STONEHAVEN
TENTATIVESUBDIVISONMAP940
1 TTM1
2 TTM1

WSPRINGCRESTDRIVE
3RDSTREET
2NDSTREET
1STSTREET

A STREET

B STREET

C STREET

OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE

IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W

W W W W W W

SS SS SS SS SS SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
W
W
W
W
W
W

W W W W W W

SS SS SS SS SS SS

SD SD SD SD
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
W
W
W
W
W
W
D
D
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W

W W W W W W W W W
D
D
D
D
D
D
68 3,682SF
82 4,426SF

41.66'
707.68'

90.33'

40.00'

40.00'
750.35'

40.00'

40.00'

50.00'

40.00'

40.00'

40.00'

40.00'

40.00'

40.00'

40.00'

40.00'

40.00'

40.00'

30.00'
R=20'

70.17'

25.00'

25.00'
R=20'

63.00'63.00'
R=20'

25.00'

25.00'
R=20'

63.00' 63.00' R=20'

83.00' 83.00'

45.00'

43.50'

43.50'

43.50'

43.50'

43.50'

43.50'

45.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'
R=20'

25.00'

25.00'
R=20'

63.00' 63.00' R=20'

25.00'

25.00'
R=20'

63.00'63.00'

83.00' 83.00'

45.00'

43.50'

43.50'

43.50'

43.50'

43.50'

43.50'

45.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'
R=52'
L=30.00'
L=32.24'
L=30.00'
L=16.90'

25.67' 42.20' 42.20' 42.20' 42.20' 42.20' 42.20' 42.20' 25.54' R=20'

50.33'

25.54'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

42.40'62.09'78.41'R=20'

95.97'

50.75'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

83.33'
109.46'

42.10'

44.28'

66.67'

76.38'

93.57'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

70.33'
R=20'

25.00'40.00'40.00'40.00'

93.57'

88.24'

88.68'

40.00'
129.11'

40.00'40.00'40.00'40.00'

1.61'
L=23.34'
L=30.00'
R=52'
L=30.00'
L=30.00'
L=9.53'
L=23.34'

85.55'
129.11'

88.68'

11.61'

90.27'

42.93'

42.80'

42.60'

42.50'

42.35'

42.20'

82.21'

33.24'
L=14.45'
L=25.14'

89.14'

88.85'

89.43'

89.71'

90.00'

90.29'

90.57'
81 3,616SF
80 3,621SF
79 3,626SF
78 3,631SF
77 3,636SF
76 3,641SF
75 3,646SF
74 3,651SF
73 3,656SF
72 3,662SF
71 3,667SF
70 3,672SF
69 3,677SF
67 3,840SF

92.25'

42.00'

90.45'

90.58'

90.71'

90.84'

90.97'

91.09'

91.22'

91.35'

91.48'

91.60'

91.73'

91.86'

91.99'

92.12'
11 6,888SF
1 3,833SF
15 3,816SF
14 3,817SF
10 4,240SF
29 3,613SF
8 3,812SF
23 7,330SF
28 3,613SF
32 3,613SF
12 6,032SF
27 3,613SF
16 3,818SF
34 3,979SF
33 3,613SF
9 3,818SF
17 3,819SF
26 3,613SF
2 3,812SF
30 3,613SF
7 3,812SF
4 3,812SF
25 3,659SF
31 3,613SF
5 3,812SF
24 5,179SF
50 3,649SF
43 3,649SF
35 3,649SF
36 3,611SF
37 3,610SF
49 3,611SF
44 3,611SF
38 3,610SF
45 3,610SF
39 3,610SF
46 3,610SF
40 3,611SF
47 3,611SF
41 3,610SF
48 3,611SF
42 3,649SF
52 3,610SF
65 3,611SF
54 3,611SF
51 3,649SF
59 3,649SF66
3,649SF
58 3,649SF
60 3,610SF
57 3,611SF
61 3,611SF
56 3,610SF
62 3,611SF
55 3,610SF
63 3,611SF
53 3,610SF
64 3,611SF
L=6.44'

45.00'
22 4,025SF
18 3,816SF
19 3,821SF
21 3,822SF
L=17.85'

88.07'44.51'
3 3,812SF
6 3,812SF
20 3,820SF
13 3,853SF
D
LICENSENO:

DESIGNENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOBNO:

DRAFTEDBY:CHECKEDBY:

OF

ORIGINALSCALESHOWNISONE
INCH.ADJUSTSCALEFOR
REDUCEDORENLARGEDPLANS.
01"
PHASE:

PROJECTNO:

STONEHAVEN
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISON MAP 940

DR HORTON HOMES

HANFORD, CA
TTM

TENTATIVE TRACT MAP

ADAMOJEDA
C79842
NJLAAO
8/10/2023
159422003
159422003
TTM2
22 8/10/2023 2:15 PM G:\dr horton - 1594\159422003-stonehaven\300 CAD\340 sheet sets\08_TTM\TTM2 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP.dwg -Erasmo Garcia 0204080

SCALEINFEET
FOR
REVIEW
ONLY

WSPRINGCRESTDRIVE
3RDSTREET
2NDSTREET
1STSTREET

B STREET

C STREET

A STREET
TTM1
1 TTM1
2 TTM1
1 TTM1
2 TTM1
2 60'
30' 30' 60'
30' 30'
60'
30' 30'
60'
30'
30'
60'
30'
30'
56'
22'
34'
56'
34'22'
6' P.U.E.
6' P.U.E.
6' P.U.E.
6' P.U.E.
6'P.U.E.
5'L.S.E.
5'L.S.E.
5' L.S.E.

B.505,P262O.R.

APN: 011-040-004

BILLINGSLEY RANCH SUBDIVISION

BILLINGSLEY BOULEVARD

EXISTINGIRRIGATIONLINES,

WELLS,ANDOVERHEAD
ELECTRICALTOBEREMOVED.

EASEMENTTOBEVACATED.
6' P.U.E.
6' P.U.E.
6'P.U.E.

NODIRECTACCESSTO

LOTFROMSIDEYARD

Tentative Tract 940

Exhibit B:

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Chapter 5-Mitigation, Monitoring, & Reporting Program
Stonehaven Subdivision
May 2023 5-1

CHAPTER 5MITIGATION,

MONITORING, AND REPORTING

PROGRAM
This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMR P) has been formulated based upon the findings of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/ MND) for the Project in the City of Hanford. The MMRP lists mitigation measures recommended in the IS/MND for the Project and identifies monitoring and reporting requirements.

Table 5-1: Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program presents the mitigation measures identified for the Project. Each mitigation measure is numbered with a symbol indicating the topical section to which it pertains, a hyphen, and the impact number. For example, AIR-2 would be the second mitigation measure identified in the Air Quality analysis of the IS/MND.

The first column of Table 5-1: Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program identifies the mitigation measure. The second column, entitled “When Monitoring is to Occur,” identifies the time the mitigation measure should be initiated. The third column, “Frequency of Monitoring,” identifies the frequency of the monitoring of the mitigation measure. The fourth column, “Agency Responsible for Monitoring,” names the party ultimately responsible for ensuring that the mitigation measure is implemented. The last columns will be used by the Lead and Responsible Agencies to ensure that individual mitigation measures have been complied with and monitored.

Chapter 5-Mitigation, Monitoring, & Reporting Program
Stonehaven Subdivision
May 2023 5-2
Table 5-1: Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program
Item Mitigation Measure
When
Monitoring is to
Occur
Frequency of
Monitoring
Agency
Responsible for
Monitoring
Method to Verify
Compliance
Verification of
Compliance
Agricultural and Forestry Resources
AG-1 That a right-to farm provision be recorded with
the recording of the final subdivision map to
ensure that future resi dents of the homes in
the project area are aware of the adjacent
agricultural uses and their right to continue to
operate.

With the
recording of the
final subdivision
map
Once City of Hanford Recorded Disclosure
Agreement
AG-2 Prior to development, the Williamson Act
Contract shall be cancelled and applicable
cancellation fees shall be paid to the County
Treasure in accordance with Government Code
Section 51283(b). In th e event that the City
exercises the option of not succeeding to the
Contract pursuant to Government Code
Section 51243.5(d), and such action is
approved by the Local Agency Formation
Commission, the Contract will be terminated,
no cancellation is required, and no cancellation
fees are required to be paid.

Prior to
construction Once City of Hanford Contract Termination
Documents
Biological Resources
BIO-1 ((AAvoidance)): The Project’s construction
activities will occur, if feasible, between
September 16 and January 31 (outside of the
Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Once City of Hanford Construction Schedule

Chapter 5-Mitigation, Monitoring, & Reporting Program
Stonehaven Subdivision
May 2023 5-3
Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program
Item Mitigation Measure
When
Monitoring is to
Occur
Frequency of
Monitoring
Agency
Responsible for
Monitoring
Method to Verify
Compliance
Verification of
Compliance
nesting bird season) to avoid impacts to
nesting birds.

BIO-2 ((PPre--cconstruction Survey)): If activities must occur within the nesting bird season (February
1 to September 15), a qualified biologist will
conduct a pre -construction survey for
Swainson’s Hawk nests onsite and within a 0.5-
mile radius. The pre-construction survey would
also provide a presence/absence survey for all
other nesting birds within the APE, no more
than seven (7) days prior to the start of
construction. All raptor nests would be
considered “active” upon the nest -building
stage.

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Once City of Hanford Submittal of Pre-
Construction Survey
BIO-3 ((EEstablish Buffers)): On discovery of any active nests near work areas, the biologist will
determine appropriate construction setback
distances based on applicable CDFW and/or
USFWS guidelines and/or the biology of the
species in question. If necessary, construction
buffers will be identified with flagging, fencing,
or other easily visibl e means, and will be
maintained until the biologist has determined
that the nestlings have fledged.

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Once City of Hanford Report from Biologist
BIO-4 ((CConsultation with CDFW)): In the event an
active Swainson’s Hawk nest, or other nest is
detected during surveys and could be
impacted by the Projec t, consultation with
CDFW will be warranted to discuss how to
implement the Project and avoid impacts to
the nest.

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Once City of Hanford Report from Biologist

Chapter 5-Mitigation, Monitoring, & Reporting Program
Stonehaven Subdivision
May 2023 5-4
Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program
Item Mitigation Measure
When
Monitoring is to
Occur
Frequency of
Monitoring
Agency
Responsible for
Monitoring
Method to Verify
Compliance
Verification of
Compliance
BIO-5 ((PPre--CConstruction Survey)): A pre-construction survey will be performe d within five days of
building and tree removal. A qualified biologist
will inspect the building s and trees for active
roosts. If the building or trees are determined
to be clear of bats, they will be removed within
five days.

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Once City of Hanford Report from Biologist
BIO-6 ((EEstablissh Buffers)): On discovery of any roosts in the APE, a qualified biologist will determine
appropriate construction setback distances.

Buffer will be removed once a qualified
biologist had determined the bat roosts are no
longer occupied.

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Once City of Hanford Report from Biologist
BIO-7 ((PPassive Relocation)): On discovery of any bat
roosts outside of the maternity roosting season
or overwintering season (September 1 to
November 30), bats may be passively relocated
from the roosts by a qualified biologist in
accordance with a bat relocation plan prepared
for the Project site by a qualified biologist. The
bat relocation plan shall include the methods
to be used to safely exclude bats from the roost
and prevent reentry.

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Once City of Hanford Report from Biologist
Cultural Resources
CUL-1 That a Burial Treatment Plan be entered to by
the applicant/property owner prior to any
earth disturbing activities.

Prior to earth-
disturbing
activities
Once City of Hanford Executed Plan
CUL-2 Should archaeological remains or artifacts be
unearthed during any stage of project
activities, work in the area of discovery shall
cease until the area is evaluated by a qualified
archaeologist. If mitigation is warranted, the
During
construction
activities
Continuously City of Hanford
Qualified
Archaeologist
Report

Chapter 5-Mitigation, Monitoring, & Reporting Program
Stonehaven Subdivision
May 2023 5-5
Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program
Item Mitigation Measure
When
Monitoring is to
Occur
Frequency of
Monitoring
Agency
Responsible for
Monitoring
Method to Verify
Compliance
Verification of
Compliance
project proponent shall abide by
recommendations of the archaeologist.

CUL-3 In the event that any human remains are
discovered on the Project site, the Kings
County Coroner must be notified of the
discovery (California Health and Safety Code,
Section 7050.5) and all activities in the
immediate area of the find or in any nearby
area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent
human remains must ce ase until appropriate
and lawful measures have been implemented.

If the Coroner determines that the remains are
not recent, but rather of Native American
origin, the Coroner shall notify the Native
American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in
Sacramento within 24 hours to permit the
NAHC to determine the Most Likely
Descendent of the deceased Native American.

During
construction
activities
Continuously City of Hanford
City of Hanford with
assistance of County
Coroner

Geology and Soils
GEO-1 Should paleontological resources be
encountered on the Project site, all ground
disturbing activities in the area shall stop. A
qualified paleontologist shall be contacted to
assess the discovery. Mi tigation may include
monitoring, recording the fossil locality, data
recovery and analysis, a final report. Public
educational outreach may also be appropriate.

Upon completion of the assessment, a report
documenting methods, findings, and
recommendations shall be prepared and
submitted to the City of Hanford for review,
and (if paleontological materials are
recovered) a paleontological repository, such
During
construction
activities
Continuously City of Hanford
Qualified
Paleontologist
Report

Chapter 5-Mitigation, Monitoring, & Reporting Program
Stonehaven Subdivision
May 2023 5-6
Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program
Item Mitigation Measure
When
Monitoring is to
Occur
Frequency of
Monitoring
Agency
Responsible for
Monitoring
Method to Verify
Compliance
Verification of
Compliance
as the University of California Museum of
Paleontology.

Tribal Cultural Resources
TRC-1 ((Tribal Cultural Resource Presentation): Due to Tribal history and knowledge of the project
area, the Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut
Tribe has concerns and is requesting to be
retained for a cultural sensitivity awareness
presentation to all construction staff of the
Project, prior to start of construction activities.

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Continuously City of Hanford City of Hanford
Presentation
TRC-2 ((TTribal Cultural Monitoring)): An approved
Tribal Monitor shall be retained to be on site to
monitor during all project -related ground-
disturbing construction activities within the
Cultural APE (i.e., grading, excavation, etc.).

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Continuously City of Hanford City of Hanford
TRC-3 ((Curation of Archaeological Collections): A
curation agreement shall be entered into with
the Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe,
materials and documents would be
professionally curated as outlined in
agreement and made available to other
archaeologists or researchers for further study.

The collections and associated records shall be
transferred, to an appropriate curation facility
as outlined in agreement with Santa Rosa
Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe, to be
accompanied by payment.

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Continuously City of Hanford City of Hanford

Tentative Tract 940

Exhibit C:

Conditions of Approval

ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
Contact the City Attorneys’ Office: (559) 584-6656
Concerning questions that you may have on the conditions listed below:

Defense and Indemnification Provisions:

1. That the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Hanford (“City”), its officials, officers, employees, representatives, agents and attorneys, from and against all claims, damages, losses, judgments, liabilities, expenses and other costs, including litigation costs and attorney’s fees, arising out of, resulting from, or in connection with, the City’s act or acts leading up to and including approval of any environmental document and/or granting of any approvals relating to the Project. Applicant’s obligation to defend, indemnify and hold the City harmless specifically includes, but is not limited to, any suit or challenge by any third party against the City which challenges or seeks to set aside, void or annul the legality or adequacy of any environmental document approved by the City or any approval related to the Project.

RESOLUTION 23-38-R

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HANFORD APPROVING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 13-23, A REQUEST TO DEVIATE FROM THE STANDARDS

OF THE HANFORD MUNICIPAL CODE, IN ORDER TO UTILIZE THE SMALL LOT PROVISIONS OF SECTION 17.10.100 TO ALLOW:

O R
EDUCED LOT SIZES BETWEEN 3,600 – 4,999 SQUARE FEET

O REDUCED LOT WIDTHS

O REDUCED LOT DEPTHS

O REDUCED SETBACKS
O EXCEPTION: NO LIMITATION ON THE WIDTH OF THE GARAGE
(STANDARD REGULATION LIMITS GARAGE WIDTH TO NO MORE
THAN 50% OF THE RESIDENCE’S FRONTAGE)
TH
E PROJECT IS LOCATED SOUTH OF HANFORD ARMONA ROAD, BETWEEN 12TH AND 13TH AVENUES (APN 011-040-030)
At a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford duly called and held on October 3, 2023, by motion of Councilmember , and seconded by Co uncilmember , and duly carried, the following resolution was adopted:

W
HEREAS, Planned Unit Development No. 13-23, a request to deviate from the standards of the Hanford Municipal Code, in order to utilize the small lot provisions of Section 17.10.100 to allow:
o Reduced lot sizes between 3,600 – 4,999 square feet
o Reduced lot widths
o Reduced lot depths
o Reduced setbacks
o E
xception: No limitation on the width of the garage (standard regulation limits garage width to no more than 50% of the residence’s frontage)
has been reviewed by the City Council of the City of Hanford in accordance with Title 17 of the Hanford Municipal Code; and
W
HEREAS, the site will be developed, as shown Tentative Tract 940 attached as Exhibit A, and substantially conform to the elevations and floorplans, attached as Exhibit B; and W
HEREAS, the City Council has carefully considered recommendations and testimony presented at the public hearing of October 3, 2023, and

Planned Unit Development 13-23

WHEREAS, all affected public utility companies, various governmental department agencies, staff, and the City Council, have given careful consideration to this planned unit development and have made recommendations thereon; and

WHEREAS, the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2023-95, and all notices related thereto were prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City of Hanford Municipal Code and Policies; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has made the following findings , pursuant to Section 17.82.050 Hanford’s Zoning Ordinance:

1. That the location and design of the planned unit development is in accordance with the purpose of this title.

Analysis: Location - That in accordance with Section 17.82.050 of the Hanford Municipal Code, a planned unit development shall be a minimum five -acre site area, except that there shall be no minimum site area requirements if the site is an infill developme nt site. The planned unit development pertains to a 12.17-acre parcel.

Design and Purpose - That planned unit developments are encouraged to achieve a more functional, aesthetically pleasing, and harmonious living and working environment within the City, that otherwise might not be possible by strict adherence to the provisio ns of the municipal code. In certain instances, the objectives of the municipal code may be achieved by development that does not conform in all respects with the land use pattern designated on the zoning map or in the zone district prescribed. The planned unit development seeks to:

o To permit development intensity greater than would otherwise be permitted by the implementation of the standards of the zone district in which the site is located; o To permit the lot patterns on size, shape, and layout that would not otherwise be permitted by the standards of the zone district in which the site is located;

The design of Planned Unit Development No. 13- 23 is consistent with the objectives of Section

17.10.100.

Planned Unit Development 13-23

2. That the planned unit development is being proposed to achieve one or more of the objectives identified in Section 17.82.030.

Analysis: That the planned unit development is requested, in order to achieve the following objectives identified in Section 17.82.030:

o To permit development intensity greater than would otherwise be permitted by the implementation of the standards of the zone district in which the site is located; o To permit the lot patterns on size, shape, and layout that would not otherwise be permitted by the standards of the zone district in which the site is located;

3. That the location and design of the planned unit development and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of the community to properties or improvements in the vicinity.

Analysis: Location - That in accordance with Section 17.82.050 of the Hanford Municipal Code, a planned unit development shall be a minimum five -acre site area, except that there shall be no minimum site area requirements if the site is an infill developme nt site. The planned unit development pertains to a 12.17-acre parcel.

Design – the Tentative Tract and Planned Unit Development have been reviewed for conformance with the requirements of the Hanford Municipal Code for the R-L-5 Low-Density Residential zone district. The development conforms in all aspects with the HMC Secti on 17.10.100 Small Lot Provisions, lots under 5,000 square feet, with the exception of Section 17.10.100 A. 10, which pertains to restrictions related to the width of the garage for the residence. In accordance with Section 17.10.100 C., where all criteria of Section 17.10.100 cannot be met, the Planned Unit Development provisions may be utilized.

Conditions of Operation – The City of Hanford Building Division is responsible for ensuring that future construction of the site follows adopted building codes, thus reducing exposures to accidents to the general public. The project has been reviewed by the various City departments, including the County Health Department, Public Works Department, Fire Department, and Building Division.

Any improvements required for public health and safety were applied to the proposal and required in the conditions of approval.

Planned Unit Development 13-23

4. That the location and design of the planned unit development will not generate more traffic than the streets in the vicinity can carry without congestion and will not overload utilities.

Analysis: The project has been reviewed by the Public Works Department and improvements and conditions of approval and mitigation measures have been placed on the project in order to mitigate the effects of the project on traffic, streets, and utilities.

5. That the planned unit development’s population density, site area and dimensions, site coverage, yard spaces, height of structures, distances between structures, off -street parking and off -street loading facilities, landscaped areas and street design will produce an environment of stable and desired character consistent with the purpose of this title.

Analysis: The Tentative Tract and Planned Unit Development have been reviewed for conformance with the requirements of the Hanford Municipal Code for the R-L-5 Low-Density Residential zone district. The development conforms in all aspects with the HMC Sect ion 17.10.100 Small Lot Provisions, lots under 5,000 square feet, with the exception of Section 17.10.100 A. 10, which pertains to restrictions related to the width of the garage for the residence. In accordance with Section 17.10.100 C., where all criteri a of Section 17.10.100 cannot be met, the Planned Unit Development provisions may be utilized. The project will produce an environment of stable and desired character consistent with the purpose of this title.

6. That the combination of different dwelling types, architectural appearance, and/or varieties of land uses in the development will complement each other and harmonize with the existing and proposed land uses in the vicinity.

Analysis: The development conforms in all aspects with the HMC Section 17.10.100 Small Lot Provisions, lots under 5,000 square feet, with the exception of Section 17.10.100 A. 10, which pertains to restrictions related to the width of the garage for the residence. I n accordance with Section 17.10.100 C., where all criteria of Section 17.10.100 cannot be met, the Planned Unit Development provisions may be utilized. The project achieves Goal L8 of the General Plan to provide a range of residential building types suitable for a variety of lifestyles, ages, affordability levels, and design options. The combination of architectural appearance will complement each

Planned Unit Development 13-23

other and will provide cohesive design with the single -family residential tract located to the east, proposed to be developed by the same developer, D.R. Horton.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council finds that no significant environmental impacts would result from the proposed project with the incorporation of mitigation measures, adopts a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, attached as Exhibit C, and certifies that Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2023-95 w as prepared consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines and City of Hanford Environmental Guidelines.

THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hanford hereby approves Planned Unit Development 13-23, subject to the conditions of approval, attached as Exhibit D, and the following:

That the Planned Unit Development shall expire with the expiration of Vesting Tentative Map 940, which shall become null and void after 24 months has elapsed from the date of approval, unless a final map has recorded. A time extension may be granted by the Commission upon written request by the applicant. The time extension, if approved, will be subject to the improvement standards and fees in effect at the time the extension for the tentative subdivision map is granted.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford held on the 3rd day of October, 2023 by the following vote:

AYES: Council Member ________________________
________________________
________________________
________________________
________________________

NOES: Council Member ________________________ ABSTAIN: Council Member ________________________ ABSENT: Council Member ________________________

__________________________________________

MAYOR

Planned Unit Development 13-23

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

COUNTY OF KINGS )

CITY OF HANFORD ) SS

I, Natalie Corral, City Clerk of the City of Hanford, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Hanford at a regular meeting thereof held on the 3rd day of October, 2023.

Dated: ______________________
__________________________________
City Clerk

Planned Unit Development 13-23

Exhibit A
Tentative Tract 940

11 1
15 14
10 29
8 23
28 32
12 27
16 34
33 9
17 26
2 30
7 4
25 31
5 24
50 43
35 36 37
49 44
38 45
39 46
40 47
41 48
42 52
65 5451
5966
58 60
57 61
56 62
55 63
8180797877767574737271706967
53 64
22 181921
68 82
3 6
20 13
SECTION1-MINORCOLLECTORSECTION

NOTTOSCALE
12'

CMUBLOCKWALL

LANDSCAPINGEASEMENT/PUE
14' 20'
4'-6" 6"
5'
PL/
ROW
PERCITYSTDST-26
4' 4'
6' 6' 2'
34' PL
68'

PAVEDSHOULDER

DIRTSHOULDER
12'
BY
OTHERS
22'
SLOPEEASEMENT:

GRADEDSWALE
W/5:1SLOPE
FUTURE
2%-3%2%-3%
PL

NOTTOSCALE
7'-6"4'-6"
60'
12'1818'
6"
SECTION2-TYPICALRESIDENTIALSECTION
PL PL
PERCITYSTDST-23
LICENSENO:

DESIGNENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOBNO:

DRAFTEDBY:CHECKEDBY:

OF

ORIGINALSCALESHOWNISONE
INCH.ADJUSTSCALEFOR
REDUCEDORENLARGEDPLANS.
01"
PHASE:

PROJECTNO:

STONEHAVEN
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISON MAP 940

DR HORTON HOMES

HANFORD, CA
TTM

COVER SHEET

ADAMOJEDA
C79842
NJLAAO
8/10/2023
159422003
159422003
TTM1
12 8/10/2023 2:12 PM G:\DR Horton - 1594\159422003-Stonehaven\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\08_TTM\TTM1 COVER SHEET.dwg -Erasmo Garcia 03060120

SCALEINFEET
SITEMAP 1"=60'

VICINITYMAP NOTTOSCALE

PROJECTLOCATION

HOUSTONAVENUE
198

HANFORD
13TH AVENUE
12TH AVENUE

HANFORARMONARD
FOR
REVIEW
ONLY

PROPERTYDIVISIONCERTIFICATE
"IHEREBYAPPLYFORAPPROVALOFTHEDIVISIONOFTHEREALPROPERTY

SHOWNINTHISPLATANDCERTIFYTHATIAMTHELEGALOWNER(ORAUTHORIZED

AGENTOFTHELEGALOWNER)OFTHEPROPERTYANDTHATTHEINFORMATION

SHOWNHEREONISTRUEANDCORRECTTOTHEBESTOFMYKNOWLEDGEAND
BELIEF".

SIGNATURE

ADDRESS

CAPACITY

GENERALNOTES
·APN:011-040-030
·SITEAREA:12.17AC
·SITEDRAINAGE:COLLECTEDINBILLINGSLEYBASINVIACURBINLETS
·TRASHCOLLECTION:CITYOFHANFORD
·SEWERAGE:CITYOFHANFORD
·WATER:CITYOFHANFORD
·NATURALGAS:THEGASCOMPANY
·TELEPHONE:SBC
·POWER:SOUTHERNCALIFORNIAEDISON
·CABLETV:CHARTER
·FIREPROTECTION:CITYOFHANFORDFIREDEPARTMENT
·FLOODZONE:X
·ZONINGSETBACKSFORR-L-5:

FRONT:12FEETFORLIVINGSPACE,AND18FEETFORGARAGES
CORNER:10FEET
REAR:10FEETTOFIRSTSTORY;15FEETTOUPPERSTORIES
INTERIORSIDE:5FEET

FLOODZONEINFORMATION

ASSHOWNONTHEFEDERALEMERGENCYMANAGEMENTAGENCY'S
FLOODINSURANCERATEMAP,PANELNUMBER06031C0195C,FOR
COMMUNITYNO.060086,KINGSCOUNTYUNINCORPORATEDAREAS,
EFFECTIVEJUNE16,2009.THEPROPERTYLIESINTHEZONEXAREA
(UNSHADED).

BASISOFBEARING
THENORTHLINEOFTHENORTHWESTQUARTEROFSECTION3-19/21,
M.D.B.&M.,TAKENASSOUTH89°24'13"EAST,ASMEASUREDBYRTKGPS
OBSERVATIONSTIEDTOLEICASMARTNETREALTIMENETWORK.

LEGALDESCRIPTION
THESOUTH11.81ACRESOFTHEWEST25.08ACRESOFTHE
NORTHEASTQUARTEROFTHENORTHWESTQUARTEROFSECTION3,
TOWNSHIP19SOUTH,RANGE21EAST,MOUNTDIABLOBASEAND
MERIDIAN.

PROJECTBENCHMARK
CITYOFHANFORDBENCHMARK#173,ABRASSCAP1FOOTEASTOFEAST

CURBRETURNATSOUTHEASTRETURNOFTHEINTERSECTIONOF
HANFORD-ARMONAROADANDGREENBRIERDRIVE.

ELEVATION=230.476'CITYOFHANFORDDATUM(2021)

SUBDIVIDERSTATEMENT
·GENERALPLAN:LOWDENSITYRESIDENTIAL
·CURRENTZONING:AE-20(KINGSCOUNTYTOBEANNEXEDINTOHANFORD) ·PROPOSEDZONING:R-L-5
·EXISTINGUSE:AGRICULTURE
·PROPOSEDUSE:LOWDENSITYRESIDENTIAL
·TOTALLOTS:82
·LOTAREA:3,600MIN/7,330MAX
·DENSITY:6.73UNITS/GROSSAC
·STREETLIGHTINGTOBEINSTALLEDPERCITYOFHANFORDSTANDARDS
·GROSSAREA:12.17ACRES.

SURVEYNOTES
·TOPOGRAPHYSHOWNWASCOLLECTEDBYPROVOST&PRITCHARD

CONSULTINGGROUPDURINGAFIELDSURVEYCONDUCTEDIN
OCTOBEROF2021.
·THEHISTORICDEEDSFORTHESUBJECTPROPERTYANDOTHER
PROPERTIESINTHENORTHEAST1/4OFTHENORTHWEST1/4OF
SECTION3,T.19S.,R.21E.,M.D.B.&M.,HAVEUSEDACREAGEAND

DIMENSIONTOGETHERANDINTERCHANGEABLYFORTHE
DESCRIPTIONOFTHEDIVISIONSOFTHIS1/4-1/4SECTION,WITH

DIMENSIONSAPPEARINGTOALIGNWITHUSEANDOCCUPATIONAND

REMAININGCONSISTENTINDEEDSANDEASEMENTSBYANDBETWEEN

THELANDOWNERS,WHILEACREAGEOFPARCELSINLEGAL
DESCRIPTIONSAPPEARTOBEAPPROXIMATEONLY.

DRHORTONHOMES

HANFORD,CA

STONEHAVEN
TENTATIVESUBDIVISONMAP940
1 TTM1
2 TTM1

WSPRINGCRESTDRIVE
3RDSTREET
2NDSTREET
1STSTREET

A STREET

B STREET

C STREET

OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE

IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W

W W W W W W

SS SS SS SS SS SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
W
W
W
W
W
W

W W W W W W

SS SS SS SS SS SS

SD SD SD SD
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
W
W
W
W
W
W
D
D
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W

W W W W W W W W W
D
D
D
D
D
D
68 3,682SF
82 4,426SF

41.66'
707.68'

90.33'

40.00'

40.00'
750.35'

40.00'

40.00'

50.00'

40.00'

40.00'

40.00'

40.00'

40.00'

40.00'

40.00'

40.00'

40.00'

40.00'

30.00'
R=20'

70.17'

25.00'

25.00'
R=20'

63.00'63.00'
R=20'

25.00'

25.00'
R=20'

63.00' 63.00' R=20'

83.00' 83.00'

45.00'

43.50'

43.50'

43.50'

43.50'

43.50'

43.50'

45.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'
R=20'

25.00'

25.00'
R=20'

63.00' 63.00' R=20'

25.00'

25.00'
R=20'

63.00'63.00'

83.00' 83.00'

45.00'

43.50'

43.50'

43.50'

43.50'

43.50'

43.50'

45.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'
R=52'
L=30.00'
L=32.24'
L=30.00'
L=16.90'

25.67' 42.20' 42.20' 42.20' 42.20' 42.20' 42.20' 42.20' 25.54' R=20'

50.33'

25.54'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

42.40'62.09'78.41'R=20'

95.97'

50.75'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

83.33'
109.46'

42.10'

44.28'

66.67'

76.38'

93.57'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

70.33'
R=20'

25.00'40.00'40.00'40.00'

93.57'

88.24'

88.68'

40.00'
129.11'

40.00'40.00'40.00'40.00'

1.61'
L=23.34'
L=30.00'
R=52'
L=30.00'
L=30.00'
L=9.53'
L=23.34'

85.55'
129.11'

88.68'

11.61'

90.27'

42.93'

42.80'

42.60'

42.50'

42.35'

42.20'

82.21'

33.24'
L=14.45'
L=25.14'

89.14'

88.85'

89.43'

89.71'

90.00'

90.29'

90.57'
81 3,616SF
80 3,621SF
79 3,626SF
78 3,631SF
77 3,636SF
76 3,641SF
75 3,646SF
74 3,651SF
73 3,656SF
72 3,662SF
71 3,667SF
70 3,672SF
69 3,677SF
67 3,840SF

92.25'

42.00'

90.45'

90.58'

90.71'

90.84'

90.97'

91.09'

91.22'

91.35'

91.48'

91.60'

91.73'

91.86'

91.99'

92.12'
11 6,888SF
1 3,833SF
15 3,816SF
14 3,817SF
10 4,240SF
29 3,613SF
8 3,812SF
23 7,330SF
28 3,613SF
32 3,613SF
12 6,032SF
27 3,613SF
16 3,818SF
34 3,979SF
33 3,613SF
9 3,818SF
17 3,819SF
26 3,613SF
2 3,812SF
30 3,613SF
7 3,812SF
4 3,812SF
25 3,659SF
31 3,613SF
5 3,812SF
24 5,179SF
50 3,649SF
43 3,649SF
35 3,649SF
36 3,611SF
37 3,610SF
49 3,611SF
44 3,611SF
38 3,610SF
45 3,610SF
39 3,610SF
46 3,610SF
40 3,611SF
47 3,611SF
41 3,610SF
48 3,611SF
42 3,649SF
52 3,610SF
65 3,611SF
54 3,611SF
51 3,649SF
59 3,649SF66
3,649SF
58 3,649SF
60 3,610SF
57 3,611SF
61 3,611SF
56 3,610SF
62 3,611SF
55 3,610SF
63 3,611SF
53 3,610SF
64 3,611SF
L=6.44'

45.00'
22 4,025SF
18 3,816SF
19 3,821SF
21 3,822SF
L=17.85'

88.07'44.51'
3 3,812SF
6 3,812SF
20 3,820SF
13 3,853SF
D
LICENSENO:

DESIGNENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOBNO:

DRAFTEDBY:CHECKEDBY:

OF

ORIGINALSCALESHOWNISONE
INCH.ADJUSTSCALEFOR
REDUCEDORENLARGEDPLANS.
01"
PHASE:

PROJECTNO:

STONEHAVEN
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISON MAP 940

DR HORTON HOMES

HANFORD, CA
TTM

TENTATIVE TRACT MAP

ADAMOJEDA
C79842
NJLAAO
8/10/2023
159422003
159422003
TTM2
22 8/10/2023 2:15 PM G:\dr horton - 1594\159422003-stonehaven\300 CAD\340 sheet sets\08_TTM\TTM2 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP.dwg -Erasmo Garcia 0204080

SCALEINFEET
FOR
REVIEW
ONLY

WSPRINGCRESTDRIVE
3RDSTREET
2NDSTREET
1STSTREET

B STREET

C STREET

A STREET
TTM1
1 TTM1
2 TTM1
1 TTM1
2 TTM1
2 60'
30' 30' 60'
30' 30'
60'
30' 30'
60'
30'
30'
60'
30'
30'
56'
22'
34'
56'
34'22'
6' P.U.E.
6' P.U.E.
6' P.U.E.
6' P.U.E.
6'P.U.E.
5'L.S.E.
5'L.S.E.
5' L.S.E.

B.505,P262O.R.

APN: 011-040-004

BILLINGSLEY RANCH SUBDIVISION

BILLINGSLEY BOULEVARD

EXISTINGIRRIGATIONLINES,

WELLS,ANDOVERHEAD
ELECTRICALTOBEREMOVED.

EASEMENTTOBEVACATED.
6' P.U.E.
6' P.U.E.
6'P.U.E.

NODIRECTACCESSTO

LOTFROMSIDEYARD

Planned Unit Development 13-23

Exhibit B
Elevations and Floor Plans

BATH 1CLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
W.I.C.CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPETSERV.CLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
2040SH
3050SH2668
BATH 2CLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL26682668BI-PASS5068 28682668
DN15R2868
F.M.T.F.M.T.

F.M.T.BDRM. 1CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET
BDRM. 2CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPETBDRM. 3CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET BI-PASS5068
2040SH26682668 3050SH
23'-0"
33'-6"
10'-6"
28'-0"
39'-0"5'-6"3050SH3050SH
21'-0"7'-0"
COVEREDENTRY8'-1" STUCCO CLG.CONC.20'-0"x20'-O" CLEAR SPACE 16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
ENTRYCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL2 BAYGARAGECONC.
30SC68266826SC68 UP15RPOWDERCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
PANTRYCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL GREATROOMCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL TEMP. GL. SLIDER6068
2668
EAT-INKITCHENCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL2668 3050SH
3030SH
23'-0"39'-0"
39'-0"20'-8"18'-4"
28'-0"
6'-0"10'-0"
21'-0"7'-0"Lower Floor - 547 SFUpper Floor - 831 SFPLAN 1.1378 | 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0248 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIES1,378 SF3 Bdrm | 2.5 Bath2 Bay Garage8' | 8' Plates1.01A | Americana

W.I.C.CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPETSERV.CLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
2040SH2668
26682668BI-PASS5068 28682668
DN15R2868
F.M.T.F.M.T.

BDRM. 2CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPETBDRM. 3CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET BI-PASS5068
2668
3050SH
10'-6"5'-6"21'-0"7'-0"
3050SH
COVEREDENTRY8'-1" STUCCO CLG.CONC.20'-0"x20'-O" CLEAR SPACE 16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
ENTRYCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL2 BAYGARAGECONC.
30SC68266826SC68 UP15RPOWDERCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
2668
6'-0"10'-0"
21'-0"7'-0"
COVEREDENTRY8'-1" STUCCO CLG.CONC.20'-0"x20'-O" CLEAR SPACE 16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
ENTRYCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL2 BAYGARAGECONC.
30SC68266826SC68 UP15RPOWDERCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
2668
6'-0"10'-0"
21'-0"7'-0"
W.I.C.CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPETSERV.CLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
2040SH2668
26682668BI-PASS5068 28682668
DN15R2868
F.M.T.F.M.T.

BDRM. 2CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPETBDRM. 3CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET BI-PASS5068
2668
10'-6"4'-6"10'-4"7'-0"
3050SH3050SH
1'-0"
10'-8"
PLAN 1.1378
| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0248 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIES1,378 SF3 Bdrm | 2.5 Bath2 Bay Garage8' | 8' Plates1.0 1B | Farmhouse1C | Craftsman

4:124:124:12RIDGERIDGE
4:124:12VALLEYVALLEY4:124:124:126"4'-0"4'-0"4:12
6:12RIDGERIDGEVALLEYVALLEYHIP
HIP
4:12
6:12
6:126:126:12
4:12
4:126:12RVH4:12
4:12RIDGERIDGEVALLEYVALLEY4:12
4:12
4:124:12
| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIESPLAN 1.1378Roof Plans1.204816 Composition RoofEave 12" / Rake 12"Eave 12" / Rake 12"Eave 12" / Rake 12"1A | Americana 1C | Craftsman1B | FarmhouseComposition RoofComposition Roof

| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0248 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIES1C | Craftsman 1A | Americana
PLAN 1.1378Front Elevations1B | Farmhouse1.3
STUCCO FINISH2x6 WOOD FASCIA
STUCCO FINISH2x6 WOOD FASCIA 2x6 WOOD FASCIASTUCCO FINISH

STUCCO OVER FOAM

ADDRESS LIGHT

ADDRESS LIGHT ADDRESS LIGHT STUCCO OVER FOAMFOAM OUTLOOKER W/ KNEE BRACE

METAL SECTIONALGARAGE DOOR METAL SECTIONALGARAGE DOOR

COMPOSITION ROOF

METAL SECTIONALGARAGE DOOR

WOOD POST

FIBER CEMENT BOARD & BATTEN

STONE VENEER OVERSTUCCO COLUMN

WAINSCOT OVERSTUCCO COLUMN

STUCCO OVER FOAMFIBER CEMENT BOARD & BATTENCOMPOSITION ROOFCOMPOSITION ROOF

3'-0"±23'-012"
TOP OF TILE8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
7'-0"7'-0"N.G.
7'-0"6'-8"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
6'-0"FENCE
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
7'-0" 2'-0"
6'-8"
| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0248 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIESBuilding Elevations1.4RearRight FrontLeft
PLAN 1A | AMERICANA

7'-0"7'-0"8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
±25'-0"

TOP OF TILE
N.G.8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
6'-0"FENCE
7'-0"6'-8"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
7'-0"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
7'-0"
6'-8"
| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0248 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIESBuilding Elevations1.5RearRight FrontLeft
PLAN 1B | FARMHOUSE

7'-0"7'-0"8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
±23'-012"
TOP OF TILE±23'-012"

TOP OF TILE
6'-8"
7'-0"
N.G.2'-10"
7'-0"6'-8"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
6'-0"FENCE
7'-0"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
2'-10"6'-8"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
7'-0"
| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0248 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIESBuilding Elevations1.6RearRight FrontLeft
PLAN 1C | CRAFTSMAN

20'-0"x20'-O" CLEAR SPACE2 BAYGARAGECONC.
30SC6816'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOORTEMP. GL.2040SH 26SC68 TEMP. GL. SLIDER6068 3050SH3050SH
2668
UP15R
ENTRYCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
POWDERCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
GREATROOMCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
2668
EAT-INKITCHENCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
PANTRYCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
CLG. BREAK LINE
3030SH20'-8"14'-10"6'-0"41'-6"
30'-0"
35'-6"
10'-7"19'-5"
6'-0"30'-0"
41'-6"
PORCH
2668F.M.T.DN15RFX2040SERV.CLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
F.M.T.26682868266826682868F.M.T.
2668W.I.C.CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET
BATH 1CLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
BI-PASS5068 BI-PASS5068BATH 2CLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
3050SH3050SH 2630SH 3050SH
BDRM. 1CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET
BDRM. 3CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPETBDRM. 2CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET LOFTCLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET

OPEN TOBELOW
3050SH
11P
35'-6"
30'-0"
19'-4"10'-8"
37'-6"
2'-0"FX30503050SH
41'-6"4'-0"
| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0248 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIESLower Floor - 637 SFUpper Floor - 946 SFPLAN 2.15831,583 SF3 Bdrm | 2.5 Bath | Loft2 Bay Garage8' | 8' Plates2.02A | Americana

20'-0"x20'-O" CLEAR SPACE2 BAYGARAGECONC.
30SC6816'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOORTEMP. GL.2040SH 26SC682668 UP15R
ENTRYCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
POWDERCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYLCLG. BREAK LINE
PORCH10'-7"19'-5"
6'-0"
2668F.M.T.DN15RFX2040SERV.CLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
2868266826682868F.M.T.
2668W.I.C.CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET
BI-PASS5068 BI-PASS5068BATH 2CLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
BDRM. 3CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPETBDRM. 2CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET

OPEN TOBELOW
3050SH FX30503050SH
19'-4"10'-8"
2'-0"
20'-0"x20'-O" CLEAR SPACE2 BAYGARAGECONC.
30SC6816'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOORTEMP. GL.2040SH 26SC682668 UP15R
ENTRYCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
POWDERCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYLCLG. BREAK LINE
PORCH10'-7"19'-5"
6'-0"
2668F.M.T.DN15RFX2040SERV.CLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
2868266826682868F.M.T.
2668W.I.C.CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET
BI-PASS5068 BI-PASS5068BATH 2CLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
BDRM. 3CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPETBDRM. 2CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET

OPEN TOBELOW
3050SH FX30503050SH
10'-8"10'-8"
1'-0"1'-0"8'-8"
| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0248 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIESPLAN 2.15831,583 SF3 Bdrm | 2.5 Bath | Loft2 Bay Garage8' | 8' Plates2.0 2B | Farmhouse2C | Craftsman

4:124:12
4:124:124:12

RIDGERIDGEVALLEYVALLEY

RIDGERIDGE
4:12
6:126:12VALLEYVALLEY
4:12
4:12
RIDGE4:124:124:124:12RIDGE
R4:12
| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIESPLAN 2.1583Roof Plans2A | AmericanaEave 12" / Rake 12"Eave 12" / Rake 12"Eave 12" / Rake 12"2C | Craftsman2B | Farmhouse2.204816 Composition RoofComposition RoofComposition Roof

| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0248 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIES2C | Craftsman 2A | Americana
PLAN 2.1583Front Elevations2B | Farmhouse2.3
STUCCO FINISH2x6 WOOD FASCIA
FOAM OUTLOOKERSTUCCO FINISH2x6 WOOD FASCIA STUCCO FINISH

STUCCO OVER FOAM CORBEL

WOOD POST

ADDRESS LIGHT

ADDRESS LIGHT STUCCO FINISHSTUCCO OVER SHAPEDSTUCCO OVER FOAM

METAL SECTIONALGARAGE DOOR METAL SECTIONALGARAGE DOOR

COMPOSITION ROOF

COMPOSITION ROOF

METAL SECTIONALGARAGE DOOR

FIBER CEMENT BOARD AND BATTENS

STUCCO OVER FOAMSTONE VENEER OVERSTUCCO COLUMN

STUCCO OVER FOAM
COMPOSITION ROOF 2X6 WOOD FASCIAFIBER CEMENT BOARDAND BATTENS

ADDRESS LIGHTFOAM TRIM

STUCCO WAINSCOT

±25'-112"
TOP OF TILE8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
6'-9"7'-0"8"TYP.
3'-0"8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"7'-0"6'-8"
6'-0"FENCE
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"7'-6"
7'-0"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
7'-6"
6'-8"
7'-0"
| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0248 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIESBuilding Elevations2.4RearRight FrontLeft
PLAN 2A | AMERICANA

8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
±25'-0"
TOP OF TILE7'-0"
7'-0"
6'-9"
9"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"7'-0"6'-8"
6'-0"FENCE
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"7'-0"
7'-0"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
6'-8"
7'-0"
7'-0"
2'-0"
| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0248 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIESPLAN 2B | FARMHOUSEBuilding Elevations2.5RearRight FrontLeft

8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
±24'-212"
TOP OF TILE6'-9"7'-0"7'-0"
9"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"7'-0"6'-8"
6'-0"FENCE
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"7'-0"2'-10"4'-2"
7'-0"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
6'-8"
7'-0"
4'-2"2'-10"7'-0"
| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0248 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIESPLAN 2C | CRAFTSMANBuilding Elevations2.6RearRight FrontLeft

UP
PORCH8'-1" STUCCO CLG.CONC.PWDR9'-1" CLG.VINYL
20'-0"x20'-O" CLEAR SPACE
GREATROOMCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYLDININGCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL ENTRYCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL15R
KITCHENCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
PANTRYCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
2 BAYGARAGECONC.
2668TEMP. GL. SLIDER6068
26SC68
2668 2668
30SC68
16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
3030SH
F.M.T.
3050SH
38'-6"4'-6"
30'-0"
20'-9"17'-9"
30'-0"11'-0"19'-0"
38'-6"4'-6"
DN15R
BI-PASS5068BI-PASS5068
BATH 2CLG. HGT. 9'-1"H.S.

BDRM. 1CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET
BDRM. 2CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET
W.I.C.CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET
BDRM. 3CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPETBDRM. 4CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET SERVICECLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYLLOFTCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
BATH 1CLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
F.M.T.

F.M.T.

F.M.T.F.M.T.
266826682668BI-PASS5068
2868266826682668
2868
2668
TEMP. GL.2040SH
3050SH
3050SH3050SH
FX2040 FXTEMP. GL.2040
30'-0"5'-312"13'-8"
43'-0"38'-6"3'-6"
43'-0"3'-6" 32'-8"
30'-0"
5'-10"11'-012"
1'-0"3050SH3050SH
1'-0"
| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0248 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIESLower Floor - 713 SFUpper Floor - 1,062 SFPLAN 3.17751775 SF4 Bdrm|2.5 Bath Loft2 Bay Garage8' | 8' Plates3.03A | Americana

UP
PORCH8'-1" STUCCO CLG.CONC.PWDR9'-1" CLG.VINYL
20'-0"x20'-O" CLEAR SPACE
ENTRYCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL15R
2 BAYGARAGECONC.
26SC68
2668 2668
30SC68
16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
F.M.T.
4'-6" 11'-0"19'-0"
DN15R
BI-PASS5068BI-PASS5068
BATH 2CLG. HGT. 9'-1"H.S.

BDRM. 2CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET
BDRM. 3CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPETBDRM. 4CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET SERVICECLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYLLOFTCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYLF.M.T.

F.M.T.266826682668BI-PASS5068
28 2668
2868
2668
3050SH
FX2040 FXTEMP. GL.2040
13'-8"11'-012" 1'-0"
3'-6"6'-10"5'-312"
3'-6"3050SH 3050SH
UP
PORCH8'-1" STUCCO CLG.CONC.PWDR9'-1" CLG.VINYL
20'-0"x20'-O" CLEAR SPACE
ENTRYCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL15R
2 BAYGARAGECONC.
26SC68
2668 2668
30SC68
16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
F.M.T.
4'-6" 11'-0"19'-0"
DN15R
BI-PASS5068BI-PASS5068
BATH 2CLG. HGT. 9'-1"H.S.

BDRM. 2CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET
BDRM. 3CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPETBDRM. 4CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET SERVICECLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYLLOFTCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYLF.M.T.

F.M.T.266826682668BI-PASS5068
28 2668
2868
2668
3050SH
FX2040 FXTEMP. GL.2040
11'-412"13'-4"
3'-6"
3'-6"5'-10"1'-0"5'-312"3050SH3050SH
1'-0"
| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0248 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIESPLAN 3.17751775 SF4 Bdrm|2.5 Bath Loft2 Bay Garage8' | 8' Plates3.1 3B | Farmhouse3C | Craftsman

VALLEYRIDGERIDGEVALLEYRR
4:124:124:124:124:124:124:126"4'-0"4'-0"

VALLEYRIDGERIDGEVALLEY
RIDGE
6:126:125:125:126:126:126:12
6"
VALLEYRIDGERIDGEVALLEYR4:123:12
4:124:124:124:12
| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIESPLAN 3.1775Roof Plans Composition RoofEave 12" / Rake 12"Eave 12" / Rake 12"Eave 12" / Rake 12"

3.204816
3A | Americana3C | Craftsman3B | FarmhouseComposition RoofComposition Roof

2x6 WOOD FASCIA
2x6 WOOD FASCIA 2x6 WOOD FASCIASTUCCO FINISH

STUCCO OVER FOAM

WOOD POST

STUCCO OVER FOAM

ADDRESS LIGHT

ADDRESS LIGHT ADDRESS LIGHT STUCCO FINISHWOOD TRIM STUCCO OVER FOAMSTUCCO OVER FOAM | 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0248 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIESPLAN 3.1775Front Elevations

FOAM OUTLOOKER W/ KNEE BRACE

3.3 METAL SECTIONALGARAGE DOOR METAL SECTIONALGARAGE DOOR

METAL SECTIONALGARAGE DOORSTUCCO OVER FOAM

FIBER CEMENT BOARD AND BATTENS

STONE VENEER OVERSTUCCO COLUMN

WAINSCOT OVERSTUCCO COLUMN
3C | Craftsman
3A | Americana
3B | Farmhouse

COMPOSITION ROOFSTUCCO FINISH

FIBER CEMENT BOARD AND BATTENS COMPOSITION ROOFCOMPOSITION ROOF

1'-0"+STD. HEEL8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
TOP OF TILE±24'-7"
N.G.
8"TYP.
7'-0"
2'-6"
7'-6"6'-8"8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"7'-0"6'-8"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"1'-0"+STD. HEEL
LINE OF POWDER FLOOR9'1" PLATE ATPOWDER ONLY7'-1014"1'-234" 7'-0"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
7'-0"
7'-0"
| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0248 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIESBuilding Elevations3.4RearRight FrontLeft
PLAN 3A | AMERICANA

1'-0"+STD. HEEL8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
TOP OF TILE±24'-7"
N.G.7'-0"7'-6"6'-8"
9"5'-0"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"7'-0"6'-8"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
LINE OF POWDER FLOOR9'1" PLATE ATPOWDER ONLY7'-1014"1'-234" 7'-0"
1'-0"+STD. HEEL
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
7'-0"
7'-0"
| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0248 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIESBuilding Elevations3.5RearRight FrontLeft
PLAN 3B | FARMHOUSE

8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
TOP OF TILE±24'-7"
N.G.7'-0"4'-2"2'-10"4'-2"2'-10"7'-0"8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"7'-0"6'-8"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
LINE OF POWDER FLOOR9'1" PLATE ATPOWDER ONLY1'-234" 7'-1034" 2'-10"4'-2"
7'-0"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
7'-0"
2'-10"
7'-0"
7'-0"4'-2"
| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0248 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIESBuilding Elevations3.6RearRight FrontLeft
PLAN 3C | CRAFTSMAN

Planned Unit Development 13-23

Exhibit C
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Chapter 5-Mitigation, Monitoring, & Reporting Program
Stonehaven Subdivision
May 2023 5-1

CHAPTER 5MITIGATION,

MONITORING, AND REPORTING

PROGRAM
This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMR P) has been formulated based upon the findings of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/ MND) for the Project in the City of Hanford. The MMRP lists mitigation measures recommended in the IS/MND for the Project and identifies monitoring and reporting requirements.

Table 5-1: Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program presents the mitigation measures identified for the Project. Each mitigation measure is numbered with a symbol indicating the topical section to which it pertains, a hyphen, and the impact number. For example, AIR-2 would be the second mitigation measure identified in the Air Quality analysis of the IS/MND.

The first column of Table 5-1: Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program identifies the mitigation measure. The second column, entitled “When Monitoring is to Occur,” identifies the time the mitigation measure should be initiated. The third column, “Frequency of Monitoring,” identifies the frequency of the monitoring of the mitigation measure. The fourth column, “Agency Responsible for Monitoring,” names the party ultimately responsible for ensuring that the mitigation measure is implemented. The last columns will be used by the Lead and Responsible Agencies to ensure that individual mitigation measures have been complied with and monitored.

Chapter 5-Mitigation, Monitoring, & Reporting Program
Stonehaven Subdivision
May 2023 5-2
Table 5-1: Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program
Item Mitigation Measure
When
Monitoring is to
Occur
Frequency of
Monitoring
Agency
Responsible for
Monitoring
Method to Verify
Compliance
Verification of
Compliance
Agricultural and Forestry Resources
AG-1 That a right-to farm provision be recorded with
the recording of the final subdivision map to
ensure that future resi dents of the homes in
the project area are aware of the adjacent
agricultural uses and their right to continue to
operate.

With the
recording of the
final subdivision
map
Once City of Hanford Recorded Disclosure
Agreement
AG-2 Prior to development, the Williamson Act
Contract shall be cancelled and applicable
cancellation fees shall be paid to the County
Treasure in accordance with Government Code
Section 51283(b). In th e event that the City
exercises the option of not succeeding to the
Contract pursuant to Government Code
Section 51243.5(d), and such action is
approved by the Local Agency Formation
Commission, the Contract will be terminated,
no cancellation is required, and no cancellation
fees are required to be paid.

Prior to
construction Once City of Hanford Contract Termination
Documents
Biological Resources
BIO-1 ((AAvoidance)): The Project’s construction
activities will occur, if feasible, between
September 16 and January 31 (outside of the
Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Once City of Hanford Construction Schedule

Chapter 5-Mitigation, Monitoring, & Reporting Program
Stonehaven Subdivision
May 2023 5-3
Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program
Item Mitigation Measure
When
Monitoring is to
Occur
Frequency of
Monitoring
Agency
Responsible for
Monitoring
Method to Verify
Compliance
Verification of
Compliance
nesting bird season) to avoid impacts to
nesting birds.

BIO-2 ((PPre--cconstruction Survey)): If activities must occur within the nesting bird season (February
1 to September 15), a qualified biologist will
conduct a pre -construction survey for
Swainson’s Hawk nests onsite and within a 0.5-
mile radius. The pre-construction survey would
also provide a presence/absence survey for all
other nesting birds within the APE, no more
than seven (7) days prior to the start of
construction. All raptor nests would be
considered “active” upon the nest -building
stage.

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Once City of Hanford Submittal of Pre-
Construction Survey
BIO-3 ((EEstablish Buffers)): On discovery of any active nests near work areas, the biologist will
determine appropriate construction setback
distances based on applicable CDFW and/or
USFWS guidelines and/or the biology of the
species in question. If necessary, construction
buffers will be identified with flagging, fencing,
or other easily visibl e means, and will be
maintained until the biologist has determined
that the nestlings have fledged.

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Once City of Hanford Report from Biologist
BIO-4 ((CConsultation with CDFW)): In the event an
active Swainson’s Hawk nest, or other nest is
detected during surveys and could be
impacted by the Projec t, consultation with
CDFW will be warranted to discuss how to
implement the Project and avoid impacts to
the nest.

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Once City of Hanford Report from Biologist

Chapter 5-Mitigation, Monitoring, & Reporting Program
Stonehaven Subdivision
May 2023 5-4
Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program
Item Mitigation Measure
When
Monitoring is to
Occur
Frequency of
Monitoring
Agency
Responsible for
Monitoring
Method to Verify
Compliance
Verification of
Compliance
BIO-5 ((PPre--CConstruction Survey)): A pre-construction survey will be performe d within five days of
building and tree removal. A qualified biologist
will inspect the building s and trees for active
roosts. If the building or trees are determined
to be clear of bats, they will be removed within
five days.

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Once City of Hanford Report from Biologist
BIO-6 ((EEstablissh Buffers)): On discovery of any roosts in the APE, a qualified biologist will determine
appropriate construction setback distances.

Buffer will be removed once a qualified
biologist had determined the bat roosts are no
longer occupied.

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Once City of Hanford Report from Biologist
BIO-7 ((PPassive Relocation)): On discovery of any bat
roosts outside of the maternity roosting season
or overwintering season (September 1 to
November 30), bats may be passively relocated
from the roosts by a qualified biologist in
accordance with a bat relocation plan prepared
for the Project site by a qualified biologist. The
bat relocation plan shall include the methods
to be used to safely exclude bats from the roost
and prevent reentry.

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Once City of Hanford Report from Biologist
Cultural Resources
CUL-1 That a Burial Treatment Plan be entered to by
the applicant/property owner prior to any
earth disturbing activities.

Prior to earth-
disturbing
activities
Once City of Hanford Executed Plan
CUL-2 Should archaeological remains or artifacts be
unearthed during any stage of project
activities, work in the area of discovery shall
cease until the area is evaluated by a qualified
archaeologist. If mitigation is warranted, the
During
construction
activities
Continuously City of Hanford
Qualified
Archaeologist
Report

Chapter 5-Mitigation, Monitoring, & Reporting Program
Stonehaven Subdivision
May 2023 5-5
Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program
Item Mitigation Measure
When
Monitoring is to
Occur
Frequency of
Monitoring
Agency
Responsible for
Monitoring
Method to Verify
Compliance
Verification of
Compliance
project proponent shall abide by
recommendations of the archaeologist.

CUL-3 In the event that any human remains are
discovered on the Project site, the Kings
County Coroner must be notified of the
discovery (California Health and Safety Code,
Section 7050.5) and all activities in the
immediate area of the find or in any nearby
area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent
human remains must ce ase until appropriate
and lawful measures have been implemented.

If the Coroner determines that the remains are
not recent, but rather of Native American
origin, the Coroner shall notify the Native
American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in
Sacramento within 24 hours to permit the
NAHC to determine the Most Likely
Descendent of the deceased Native American.

During
construction
activities
Continuously City of Hanford
City of Hanford with
assistance of County
Coroner

Geology and Soils
GEO-1 Should paleontological resources be
encountered on the Project site, all ground
disturbing activities in the area shall stop. A
qualified paleontologist shall be contacted to
assess the discovery. Mi tigation may include
monitoring, recording the fossil locality, data
recovery and analysis, a final report. Public
educational outreach may also be appropriate.

Upon completion of the assessment, a report
documenting methods, findings, and
recommendations shall be prepared and
submitted to the City of Hanford for review,
and (if paleontological materials are
recovered) a paleontological repository, such
During
construction
activities
Continuously City of Hanford
Qualified
Paleontologist
Report

Chapter 5-Mitigation, Monitoring, & Reporting Program
Stonehaven Subdivision
May 2023 5-6
Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program
Item Mitigation Measure
When
Monitoring is to
Occur
Frequency of
Monitoring
Agency
Responsible for
Monitoring
Method to Verify
Compliance
Verification of
Compliance
as the University of California Museum of
Paleontology.

Tribal Cultural Resources
TRC-1 ((Tribal Cultural Resource Presentation): Due to Tribal history and knowledge of the project
area, the Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut
Tribe has concerns and is requesting to be
retained for a cultural sensitivity awareness
presentation to all construction staff of the
Project, prior to start of construction activities.

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Continuously City of Hanford City of Hanford
Presentation
TRC-2 ((TTribal Cultural Monitoring)): An approved
Tribal Monitor shall be retained to be on site to
monitor during all project -related ground-
disturbing construction activities within the
Cultural APE (i.e., grading, excavation, etc.).

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Continuously City of Hanford City of Hanford
TRC-3 ((Curation of Archaeological Collections): A
curation agreement shall be entered into with
the Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe,
materials and documents would be
professionally curated as outlined in
agreement and made available to other
archaeologists or researchers for further study.

The collections and associated records shall be
transferred, to an appropriate curation facility
as outlined in agreement with Santa Rosa
Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe, to be
accompanied by payment.

Prior to the start
of construction
activities
Continuously City of Hanford City of Hanford

Planned Unit Development 13-23

Exhibit D
Conditions of Approval
Planned Unit Development No. 13-23 and Tentative Tract 940

ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
Contact the City Attorneys’ Office: (559) 584-6656
Concerning questions that you may have on the conditions listed below:

Defense and Indemnification Provisions:

1. That the applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Hanford (“City”), its officials, officers, employees, representatives, agents and attorneys, from and against all claims, damages, losses, judgments, liabilities, expenses and other costs, including litigation costs and attorney’s fees, arising out of, resulting from, or in connection with, the City’s act or acts leading up to and including approval of any environmental document and/or granting of any approvals relating to the Project. Applicant’s obligation to defend, indemnify and hold the City harmless specifically includes, but is not limited to, any suit or challenge by any third party against the City which challenges or seeks to set aside, void or annul the legality or adequacy of any environmental document approved by the City or any approval related to the Project.

▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲▲
▲
▲
▲
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲▲
▲▲▲▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲▲
▲
▲
▲
▲▲
▲
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲
▲▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 3, OF TOWNSHIP 19 SOUTH, RANGE 21 EAST,

MOUNT DIABLO BASE & MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF KINGS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

POINT OF BEGINNING
For assessment purposes only. This description of land is not a legal property description as defined in the
Subdivision Map Act and may not be used as the
basis for an offer for sale of the land described.

HANFORD-ARMONA ROAD
APN 011-040-030

NW CORNER,
SEC. 3-19/21
SITE

HANFORD-ARMONA RD

NOT TO SCALEVICINITY MAP

HOUSTON AVE
13TH
AVE
S.R. 198

CITYOFHANFORD

COUNTYOFKINGS
LEGEND

COURSE NUMBER

EXISTING CITY LIMITS LINE

PROPOSED ANNEXATION AREA
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

ANNEXATION AREA

12.17 ACRES

CITY LIMITS LINE

CITY LIMITS LINE
N 1/4 CORNER,
SEC. 3-19/21
5-PM-72

CITYOFHANFORD

COUNTYOFKINGS
PCL. 2
PCL. 1
DOC. 2001999, O.R.K.C.

B.505, P.262, O.R.K.C.
15-PM-79
"EAST 21.12 ACRESOF
NE
1 4OF NW
1 4, SEC. 3"
4/27/23

ANNEXATION NO. ____

TO THE CITY OF HANFORD

GEOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION
All that certain real property, situate in the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 3 of Township 19 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Base & Meridian, in the County of Kings, State of California, described as follows:

BEGINNING at an angle point in the existing City Limit line of the City of Hanford, said point being the Southwest corner of the East 21.12 acres of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 3, and being on the North line of Parcel 2 of that Parcel Map recorded in Book 5 of Parcel Maps at Page 72, Kings County Records; thence 1) North 89°36’26” West, along the North line of said Parcel 2 and continuing along the North line of Parcel 1 of said Parcel Map, 707.68 feet, more or less, to the Northwest corner of said Parcel 1, being a point on the West line of the East half of said Northwest quarter of Section 3; thence
2) North 0°46’46” East, along said West line, 261.95 feet, more or less, to the Southeast corner of that parcel described in Doc. 2001999, Official Records of Kings County, being an angle point in said existing City Limit line; thence along said existing City Limit Line the following three (3) courses:
3) North 0°46’46” East, along said West line, 488.40 feet, more or less, to the Southwest corner of the North 819.06 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 3; thence
4) South 89°24’13” East, along the South line of the North 819.06 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 3, a distance of 707.66 feet, more or less, to the West line of the East 21.12 acres of said Northeast quarter; thence 5) South 0°46’46” West, along last said West line, 747.83 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Containing approximately 12.17 acres.

For assessment purposes only. This description of land is not a legal property description as defined in the Subdivision Map Act and may not be used as the basis for an offer for sale of the land described. 4/27/23

11 1
15 14
10 29
8 23
28 32
12 27
16 34
33 9
17 26
2 30
7 4
25 31
5 24
50 43
35 36 37
49 44
38 45
39 46
40 47
41 48
42 52
65 5451
5966
58 60
57 61
56 62
55 63
8180797877767574737271706967
53 64
22 181921
68 82
3 6
20 13
SECTION1-MINORCOLLECTORSECTION

NOTTOSCALE
12'

CMUBLOCKWALL

LANDSCAPINGEASEMENT/PUE
14' 20'
4'-6" 6"
5'
PL/
ROW
PERCITYSTDST-26
4' 4'
6' 6' 2'
34' PL
68'

PAVEDSHOULDER

DIRTSHOULDER
12'
BY
OTHERS
22'
SLOPEEASEMENT:

GRADEDSWALE
W/5:1SLOPE
FUTURE
2%-3%2%-3%
PL

NOTTOSCALE
7'-6"4'-6"
60'
12'1818'
6"
SECTION2-TYPICALRESIDENTIALSECTION
PL PL
PERCITYSTDST-23
LICENSENO:

DESIGNENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOBNO:

DRAFTEDBY:CHECKEDBY:

OF

ORIGINALSCALESHOWNISONE
INCH.ADJUSTSCALEFOR
REDUCEDORENLARGEDPLANS.
01"
PHASE:

PROJECTNO:

STONEHAVEN
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISON MAP 940

DR HORTON HOMES

HANFORD, CA
TTM

COVER SHEET

ADAMOJEDA
C79842
NJLAAO
8/10/2023
159422003
159422003
TTM1
12 8/10/2023 2:12 PM G:\DR Horton - 1594\159422003-Stonehaven\300 CAD\340 Sheet Sets\08_TTM\TTM1 COVER SHEET.dwg -Erasmo Garcia 03060120

SCALEINFEET
SITEMAP 1"=60'

VICINITYMAP NOTTOSCALE

PROJECTLOCATION

HOUSTONAVENUE
198

HANFORD
13TH AVENUE
12TH AVENUE

HANFORARMONARD
FOR
REVIEW
ONLY

PROPERTYDIVISIONCERTIFICATE
"IHEREBYAPPLYFORAPPROVALOFTHEDIVISIONOFTHEREALPROPERTY

SHOWNINTHISPLATANDCERTIFYTHATIAMTHELEGALOWNER(ORAUTHORIZED

AGENTOFTHELEGALOWNER)OFTHEPROPERTYANDTHATTHEINFORMATION

SHOWNHEREONISTRUEANDCORRECTTOTHEBESTOFMYKNOWLEDGEAND
BELIEF".

SIGNATURE

ADDRESS

CAPACITY

GENERALNOTES
·APN:011-040-030
·SITEAREA:12.17AC
·SITEDRAINAGE:COLLECTEDINBILLINGSLEYBASINVIACURBINLETS
·TRASHCOLLECTION:CITYOFHANFORD
·SEWERAGE:CITYOFHANFORD
·WATER:CITYOFHANFORD
·NATURALGAS:THEGASCOMPANY
·TELEPHONE:SBC
·POWER:SOUTHERNCALIFORNIAEDISON
·CABLETV:CHARTER
·FIREPROTECTION:CITYOFHANFORDFIREDEPARTMENT
·FLOODZONE:X
·ZONINGSETBACKSFORR-L-5:

FRONT:12FEETFORLIVINGSPACE,AND18FEETFORGARAGES
CORNER:10FEET
REAR:10FEETTOFIRSTSTORY;15FEETTOUPPERSTORIES
INTERIORSIDE:5FEET

FLOODZONEINFORMATION

ASSHOWNONTHEFEDERALEMERGENCYMANAGEMENTAGENCY'S
FLOODINSURANCERATEMAP,PANELNUMBER06031C0195C,FOR
COMMUNITYNO.060086,KINGSCOUNTYUNINCORPORATEDAREAS,
EFFECTIVEJUNE16,2009.THEPROPERTYLIESINTHEZONEXAREA
(UNSHADED).

BASISOFBEARING
THENORTHLINEOFTHENORTHWESTQUARTEROFSECTION3-19/21,
M.D.B.&M.,TAKENASSOUTH89°24'13"EAST,ASMEASUREDBYRTKGPS
OBSERVATIONSTIEDTOLEICASMARTNETREALTIMENETWORK.

LEGALDESCRIPTION
THESOUTH11.81ACRESOFTHEWEST25.08ACRESOFTHE
NORTHEASTQUARTEROFTHENORTHWESTQUARTEROFSECTION3,
TOWNSHIP19SOUTH,RANGE21EAST,MOUNTDIABLOBASEAND
MERIDIAN.

PROJECTBENCHMARK
CITYOFHANFORDBENCHMARK#173,ABRASSCAP1FOOTEASTOFEAST

CURBRETURNATSOUTHEASTRETURNOFTHEINTERSECTIONOF
HANFORD-ARMONAROADANDGREENBRIERDRIVE.

ELEVATION=230.476'CITYOFHANFORDDATUM(2021)

SUBDIVIDERSTATEMENT
·GENERALPLAN:LOWDENSITYRESIDENTIAL
·CURRENTZONING:AE-20(KINGSCOUNTYTOBEANNEXEDINTOHANFORD) ·PROPOSEDZONING:R-L-5
·EXISTINGUSE:AGRICULTURE
·PROPOSEDUSE:LOWDENSITYRESIDENTIAL
·TOTALLOTS:82
·LOTAREA:3,600MIN/7,330MAX
·DENSITY:6.73UNITS/GROSSAC
·STREETLIGHTINGTOBEINSTALLEDPERCITYOFHANFORDSTANDARDS
·GROSSAREA:12.17ACRES.

SURVEYNOTES
·TOPOGRAPHYSHOWNWASCOLLECTEDBYPROVOST&PRITCHARD

CONSULTINGGROUPDURINGAFIELDSURVEYCONDUCTEDIN
OCTOBEROF2021.
·THEHISTORICDEEDSFORTHESUBJECTPROPERTYANDOTHER
PROPERTIESINTHENORTHEAST1/4OFTHENORTHWEST1/4OF
SECTION3,T.19S.,R.21E.,M.D.B.&M.,HAVEUSEDACREAGEAND

DIMENSIONTOGETHERANDINTERCHANGEABLYFORTHE
DESCRIPTIONOFTHEDIVISIONSOFTHIS1/4-1/4SECTION,WITH

DIMENSIONSAPPEARINGTOALIGNWITHUSEANDOCCUPATIONAND

REMAININGCONSISTENTINDEEDSANDEASEMENTSBYANDBETWEEN

THELANDOWNERS,WHILEACREAGEOFPARCELSINLEGAL
DESCRIPTIONSAPPEARTOBEAPPROXIMATEONLY.

DRHORTONHOMES

HANFORD,CA

STONEHAVEN
TENTATIVESUBDIVISONMAP940
1 TTM1
2 TTM1

WSPRINGCRESTDRIVE
3RDSTREET
2NDSTREET
1STSTREET

A STREET

B STREET

C STREET

OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE

IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR IRR
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W

W W W W W W

SS SS SS SS SS SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
W
W
W
W
W
W

W W W W W W

SS SS SS SS SS SS

SD SD SD SD
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
W
W
W
W
W
W
D
D
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W

W W W W W W W W W
D
D
D
D
D
D
68 3,682SF
82 4,426SF

41.66'
707.68'

90.33'

40.00'

40.00'
750.35'

40.00'

40.00'

50.00'

40.00'

40.00'

40.00'

40.00'

40.00'

40.00'

40.00'

40.00'

40.00'

40.00'

30.00'
R=20'

70.17'

25.00'

25.00'
R=20'

63.00'63.00'
R=20'

25.00'

25.00'
R=20'

63.00' 63.00' R=20'

83.00' 83.00'

45.00'

43.50'

43.50'

43.50'

43.50'

43.50'

43.50'

45.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'
R=20'

25.00'

25.00'
R=20'

63.00' 63.00' R=20'

25.00'

25.00'
R=20'

63.00'63.00'

83.00' 83.00'

45.00'

43.50'

43.50'

43.50'

43.50'

43.50'

43.50'

45.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'

83.00' 83.00'
R=52'
L=30.00'
L=32.24'
L=30.00'
L=16.90'

25.67' 42.20' 42.20' 42.20' 42.20' 42.20' 42.20' 42.20' 25.54' R=20'

50.33'

25.54'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

42.40'62.09'78.41'R=20'

95.97'

50.75'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

83.33'
109.46'

42.10'

44.28'

66.67'

76.38'

93.57'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

90.33'

70.33'
R=20'

25.00'40.00'40.00'40.00'

93.57'

88.24'

88.68'

40.00'
129.11'

40.00'40.00'40.00'40.00'

1.61'
L=23.34'
L=30.00'
R=52'
L=30.00'
L=30.00'
L=9.53'
L=23.34'

85.55'
129.11'

88.68'

11.61'

90.27'

42.93'

42.80'

42.60'

42.50'

42.35'

42.20'

82.21'

33.24'
L=14.45'
L=25.14'

89.14'

88.85'

89.43'

89.71'

90.00'

90.29'

90.57'
81 3,616SF
80 3,621SF
79 3,626SF
78 3,631SF
77 3,636SF
76 3,641SF
75 3,646SF
74 3,651SF
73 3,656SF
72 3,662SF
71 3,667SF
70 3,672SF
69 3,677SF
67 3,840SF

92.25'

42.00'

90.45'

90.58'

90.71'

90.84'

90.97'

91.09'

91.22'

91.35'

91.48'

91.60'

91.73'

91.86'

91.99'

92.12'
11 6,888SF
1 3,833SF
15 3,816SF
14 3,817SF
10 4,240SF
29 3,613SF
8 3,812SF
23 7,330SF
28 3,613SF
32 3,613SF
12 6,032SF
27 3,613SF
16 3,818SF
34 3,979SF
33 3,613SF
9 3,818SF
17 3,819SF
26 3,613SF
2 3,812SF
30 3,613SF
7 3,812SF
4 3,812SF
25 3,659SF
31 3,613SF
5 3,812SF
24 5,179SF
50 3,649SF
43 3,649SF
35 3,649SF
36 3,611SF
37 3,610SF
49 3,611SF
44 3,611SF
38 3,610SF
45 3,610SF
39 3,610SF
46 3,610SF
40 3,611SF
47 3,611SF
41 3,610SF
48 3,611SF
42 3,649SF
52 3,610SF
65 3,611SF
54 3,611SF
51 3,649SF
59 3,649SF66
3,649SF
58 3,649SF
60 3,610SF
57 3,611SF
61 3,611SF
56 3,610SF
62 3,611SF
55 3,610SF
63 3,611SF
53 3,610SF
64 3,611SF
L=6.44'

45.00'
22 4,025SF
18 3,816SF
19 3,821SF
21 3,822SF
L=17.85'

88.07'44.51'
3 3,812SF
6 3,812SF
20 3,820SF
13 3,853SF
D
LICENSENO:

DESIGNENGINEER:

SHEET
DATE:

JOBNO:

DRAFTEDBY:CHECKEDBY:

OF

ORIGINALSCALESHOWNISONE
INCH.ADJUSTSCALEFOR
REDUCEDORENLARGEDPLANS.
01"
PHASE:

PROJECTNO:

STONEHAVEN
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISON MAP 940

DR HORTON HOMES

HANFORD, CA
TTM

TENTATIVE TRACT MAP

ADAMOJEDA
C79842
NJLAAO
8/10/2023
159422003
159422003
TTM2
22 8/10/2023 2:15 PM G:\dr horton - 1594\159422003-stonehaven\300 CAD\340 sheet sets\08_TTM\TTM2 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP.dwg -Erasmo Garcia 0204080

SCALEINFEET
FOR
REVIEW
ONLY

WSPRINGCRESTDRIVE
3RDSTREET
2NDSTREET
1STSTREET

B STREET

C STREET

A STREET
TTM1
1 TTM1
2 TTM1
1 TTM1
2 TTM1
2 60'
30' 30' 60'
30' 30'
60'
30' 30'
60'
30'
30'
60'
30'
30'
56'
22'
34'
56'
34'22'
6' P.U.E.
6' P.U.E.
6' P.U.E.
6' P.U.E.
6'P.U.E.
5'L.S.E.
5'L.S.E.
5' L.S.E.

B.505,P262O.R.

APN: 011-040-004

BILLINGSLEY RANCH SUBDIVISION

BILLINGSLEY BOULEVARD

EXISTINGIRRIGATIONLINES,

WELLS,ANDOVERHEAD
ELECTRICALTOBEREMOVED.

EASEMENTTOBEVACATED.
6' P.U.E.
6' P.U.E.
6'P.U.E.

NODIRECTACCESSTO

LOTFROMSIDEYARD

Plan for Services – Annexation 162; Tentative Tract 940

Sewer Improvements

The developer’s engineer will provide a sanitary sewer master plan, complete with calculations for the entire subdivision prior to recording a subdivision final map for the development. A six-inch sanitary s ewer main is required to be installed throughout the development designed to tie in with the sanitary sewer system with the development along the east boundary. The sanitary sewer tie-in-point is required to be located at the east end of “A” Street, as shown on the tentative map.

Storm Drainage Improvements

The developer’s engineer will provide a storm drainage master plan, complete with calculations for the entire subdivision prior to recording a subdivision final map for the development. All drainage from the subdivision is proposed to be retained in the retention basin within the tract to the east, Tentative Tract 937, Billingsly. The basin calculations for Tentative Tract 937 have accounted for storm drain intake from the Stonehaven subdivision and is in conformance with City Standards. The developer will install a storm drain catch basin on W. Spring Crest Street near the east boundary and tie in to existing underground storm drain piping that is stubbed to the east boundary leading to the a storm drain basin.

Water System

The developer’s engineer will provide a water system master plan, complete with calculations for the entire subdivision, for City review and approval prior to recording a subdivision final map. Provisions will be made for service to future areas of development located adjacent to the subdivision.

All existing water wells located within the proposed development will be abandoned, in conformance with State of California Department of Health standards.

Fire and Police

Fire and police services are adequate to service the area to be annexed. Impacts to fire and police services will be mitigated through payment of impact fees.

School

Educational services needed for the development of the Project will be provided by the Hanford Elementary School District (HESD) and Hanford Joint Union High School District (HJUHSD). Payment of fees to a school district is considered mitigation for project impacts on school facilities (Government Code Section 65996(a)). Therefore, the project applicant would be required to pay the statutory fees to accommodate the impact of project- generated student.

BATH 1CLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
W.I.C.CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPETSERV.CLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
2040SH
3050SH2668
BATH 2CLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL26682668BI-PASS5068 28682668
DN15R2868
F.M.T.F.M.T.

F.M.T.BDRM. 1CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET
BDRM. 2CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPETBDRM. 3CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET BI-PASS5068
2040SH26682668 3050SH
23'-0"
33'-6"
10'-6"
28'-0"
39'-0"5'-6"3050SH3050SH
21'-0"7'-0"
COVEREDENTRY8'-1" STUCCO CLG.CONC.20'-0"x20'-O" CLEAR SPACE 16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
ENTRYCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL2 BAYGARAGECONC.
30SC68266826SC68 UP15RPOWDERCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
PANTRYCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL GREATROOMCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL TEMP. GL. SLIDER6068
2668
EAT-INKITCHENCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL2668 3050SH
3030SH
23'-0"39'-0"
39'-0"20'-8"18'-4"
28'-0"
6'-0"10'-0"
21'-0"7'-0"Lower Floor - 547 SFUpper Floor - 831 SFPLAN 1.1378 | 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0248 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIES1,378 SF3 Bdrm | 2.5 Bath2 Bay Garage8' | 8' Plates1.01A | Americana

W.I.C.CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPETSERV.CLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
2040SH2668
26682668BI-PASS5068 28682668
DN15R2868
F.M.T.F.M.T.

BDRM. 2CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPETBDRM. 3CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET BI-PASS5068
2668
3050SH
10'-6"5'-6"21'-0"7'-0"
3050SH
COVEREDENTRY8'-1" STUCCO CLG.CONC.20'-0"x20'-O" CLEAR SPACE 16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
ENTRYCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL2 BAYGARAGECONC.
30SC68266826SC68 UP15RPOWDERCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
2668
6'-0"10'-0"
21'-0"7'-0"
COVEREDENTRY8'-1" STUCCO CLG.CONC.20'-0"x20'-O" CLEAR SPACE 16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR
ENTRYCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL2 BAYGARAGECONC.
30SC68266826SC68 UP15RPOWDERCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
2668
6'-0"10'-0"
21'-0"7'-0"
W.I.C.CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPETSERV.CLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
2040SH2668
26682668BI-PASS5068 28682668
DN15R2868
F.M.T.F.M.T.

BDRM. 2CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPETBDRM. 3CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET BI-PASS5068
2668
10'-6"4'-6"10'-4"7'-0"
3050SH3050SH
1'-0"
10'-8"
PLAN 1.1378
| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0248 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIES1,378 SF3 Bdrm | 2.5 Bath2 Bay Garage8' | 8' Plates1.0 1B | Farmhouse1C | Craftsman

4:124:124:12RIDGERIDGE
4:124:12VALLEYVALLEY4:124:124:126"4'-0"4'-0"4:12
6:12RIDGERIDGEVALLEYVALLEYHIP
HIP
4:12
6:12
6:126:126:12
4:12
4:126:12RVH4:12
4:12RIDGERIDGEVALLEYVALLEY4:12
4:12
4:124:12
| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIESPLAN 1.1378Roof Plans1.204816 Composition RoofEave 12" / Rake 12"Eave 12" / Rake 12"Eave 12" / Rake 12"1A | Americana 1C | Craftsman1B | FarmhouseComposition RoofComposition Roof

| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0248 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIES1C | Craftsman 1A | Americana
PLAN 1.1378Front Elevations1B | Farmhouse1.3
STUCCO FINISH2x6 WOOD FASCIA
STUCCO FINISH2x6 WOOD FASCIA 2x6 WOOD FASCIASTUCCO FINISH

STUCCO OVER FOAM

ADDRESS LIGHT

ADDRESS LIGHT ADDRESS LIGHT STUCCO OVER FOAMFOAM OUTLOOKER W/ KNEE BRACE

METAL SECTIONALGARAGE DOOR METAL SECTIONALGARAGE DOOR

COMPOSITION ROOF

METAL SECTIONALGARAGE DOOR

WOOD POST

FIBER CEMENT BOARD & BATTEN

STONE VENEER OVERSTUCCO COLUMN

WAINSCOT OVERSTUCCO COLUMN

STUCCO OVER FOAMFIBER CEMENT BOARD & BATTENCOMPOSITION ROOFCOMPOSITION ROOF

3'-0"±23'-012"
TOP OF TILE8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
7'-0"7'-0"N.G.
7'-0"6'-8"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
6'-0"FENCE
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
7'-0" 2'-0"
6'-8"
| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0248 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIESBuilding Elevations1.4RearRight FrontLeft
PLAN 1A | AMERICANA

7'-0"7'-0"8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
±25'-0"

TOP OF TILE
N.G.8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
6'-0"FENCE
7'-0"6'-8"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
7'-0"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
7'-0"
6'-8"
| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0248 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIESBuilding Elevations1.5RearRight FrontLeft
PLAN 1B | FARMHOUSE

7'-0"7'-0"8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
±23'-012"
TOP OF TILE±23'-012"

TOP OF TILE
6'-8"
7'-0"
N.G.2'-10"
7'-0"6'-8"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
6'-0"FENCE
7'-0"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
2'-10"6'-8"
8'-1"8'-1"
8'-1"8'-1"
7'-0"
| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0248 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIESBuilding Elevations1.6RearRight FrontLeft
PLAN 1C | CRAFTSMAN

20'-0"x20'-O" CLEAR SPACE2 BAYGARAGECONC.
30SC6816'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOORTEMP. GL.2040SH 26SC68 TEMP. GL. SLIDER6068 3050SH3050SH
2668
UP15R
ENTRYCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
POWDERCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
GREATROOMCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
2668
EAT-INKITCHENCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
PANTRYCLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
CLG. BREAK LINE
3030SH20'-8"14'-10"6'-0"41'-6"
30'-0"
35'-6"
10'-7"19'-5"
6'-0"30'-0"
41'-6"
PORCH
2668F.M.T.DN15RFX2040SERV.CLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
F.M.T.26682868266826682868F.M.T.
2668W.I.C.CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET
BATH 1CLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
BI-PASS5068 BI-PASS5068BATH 2CLG. HGT. 8'-1"VINYL
3050SH3050SH 2630SH 3050SH
BDRM. 1CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET
BDRM. 3CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPETBDRM. 2CLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET LOFTCLG. HGT. 8'-1"CARPET

OPEN TOBELOW
3050SH
11P
35'-6"
30'-0"
19'-4"10'-8"
37'-6"
2'-0"FX30503050SH
41'-6"4'-0"
| 2022XXX | 05-09-22C 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0248 DESIGN DEVELOPMENTCALIFORNIA-LIBRARY SERIESLower Floor - 637 SFUpper Floor - 946 SFPLAN 2.15831,583 SF3 Bdrm | 2.5 Bath | Loft2 Bay Garage8' | 8' Plates2.02A | Americana