Agenda packet — Hanford City Council, July 2, 2024 (part 4 of 5)

# of Units Units Rate Total
Pavement Structure Determination
Mobilization of Drilling Rig 1 LS $2,470.00 2,470.00$
Borings - Per Scope - 18 holes x 15 feet deep 270 Feet $24.00 6,480.00$ Drilling Per Diem 2 Days $198.00 396.00$
Pavement Cores - Per Scope - 29 holes 29 EA $130.00 3,770.00$ Core Person Per Diem 4 Days $198.00 792.00$
Patch Holes as appropriate 47 EA $115.00 5,405.00$
-$
Bulk Samples 18 EA $45.00 810.00$
Atterberg Limits 8 EA $130.00 1,040.00$
CBR (3-point) 1 EA $575.00 575.00$
Grain Size (sieve only) 10 EA $95.00 950.00$
Modified Proctor Compaction 3 EA $190.00 570.00$
Unit Weight + Moisture Content 144 EA $45.00 6,480.00$
Standard Proctor 3 EA $255.00 765.00$
Geotech person 48 Hours $165.00 7,920.00$
Mileage 600 Miles $0.67 402.00$
Per Diem - Lodging + Food 4 Days $198.00 792.00$
Utility Locate Verification 1 LS $950.00 950.00$
Engineering Report - Staff Engineer 20 Hours $165.00 3,300.00$ Engineering Report - Senior Engineer 6 Hours $195.00 1,170.00$ Drafting 12 Hours $130.00 1,560.00$
Admin 16 Hours $90.00 1,440.00$
Misc supplies copies etc. 1 LS $100.00 100.00$
Project Manager - scope & project mgmnt 10 Hours $210.00 2,100.00$ Senior Engineer (4 Field Days) 49 Hours $197.92 9,698.23 Senior Engineer - OT (Field) 0 Hours $197.92 -
Per Diem 4 Days $198.00 792.00
Mileage 580 Miles $0.67 388.60
Total Pavement Structure Determination 61,115.83$

HANFORD MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

CITY OF HANFORD, CALIFORNIA

INDEPENDENT FEE ESTIMATE
Pavement Maintenance Management Plan (PMMP)
Staff Total
Hours & Fees Page 1

Page 381 of 698 ends

HANFORD MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

CITY OF HANFORD, CALIFORNIA

INDEPENDENT FEE ESTIMATE
Pavement Maintenance Management Plan (PMMP)
Staff TotalFalling Weight Deflectometer Testing Engr Sr Tech Unit Rates: $165.51 $130.27
Mobilization (Ventura, CA) 8 8 Hours 2,366.23$
Equipment Mob (Ventura, CA) 1 LS 1,015.00$
NDT Equipment Usage 2 Days 4,500.00$
HWD Testing 12 12 Hours 3,549.35$
Equipment Set Up 1 1 Hours 295.78$
Photos 1 1 Hours 295.78$
Per Diem 1 1 Days 396.00$
Project Management # of Units Units Rate Total
Principal Engineer 16 Hours $271.26 4,340.16
Mileage 520 Miles $0.67 348.40
Per Diem - Principal Engineer 1 Days $198.00 198.00
Total Falling Weight Deflectometer Testing 17,304.70$
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) # of Units Units Rate Total Principal Engineer 2 Hours $271.26 542.52$
Engineer 36 Hours $165.51 5,958.22$
CAD/GIS (Needed for mapping work) 40 Hours $130.27 5,210.92$ Senior Tech 24 Hours $130.27 3,126.55$
Admin 4 Hours $74.69 298.75$
Evaluation of Data
Principal Engineer 2 Hours $271.26 542.52$
Senior Engineer 8 Hours $197.92 1,583.38$
Engineer 32 Hours $165.51 5,296.19$
Total PCI 22,559.06$
Engineering Analysis and Report # of Units Units Rate Total Principal Engineer 24 Hours $271.26 6,510.24$
Senior Engineer 72 Hours $197.92 14,250.46$
Junior Engineer 164 Hours $165.51 27,142.98$
CAD/GIS (Needed for mapping work) 24 Hours $130.27 3,126.55$ Clerical 24 Hours $74.69 1,792.51$
Total Engineering Analysis & Report 52,822.74$
Total for ALL PMMP Services: 153,802.33$
Surface Condition Survey (includes network
development, preparation, & mobilization)
Hours & Fees Page 2

Page 382 of 698 ends

ATTACHMENT 2
EXHIBIT “A”, PROPERTY MAP

HANFORD MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

HANFORD, KINGS COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Page 383 of 698 ends

RPZRPZRPZRPZRPZ
RPZ

RPZRPZRPZRPZRPZRPZ
RPZ
RPZ
RPZ
RPZRPZ
RPZ
RPZ

RPZRPZRPZRPZ
TOFA
TOFA
TOFA
++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++
TOFA
TOFA
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

TOFATOFA
TOFA

TOFATOFATOFA
TOFA

TOFATOFA
TOFA

TOFATOFATOFA
TOFA
TOFA

TOFATOFATOFATOFA

TOFATOFA
TOFA

TOFATOFATOFA
245250
250250
245
250250
245
245

OFZOFZOFZOFZOFZOFZOFZOFZOFZOFZOFZOFZOFZOFZOFZOFZOFZOFZOFZOFZOFZOFZOFZOFZOFZOFZ

RSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSA

BRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRL

BRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRL

BRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRL
BRLBRL

ROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFA

ROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFAROFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFATOFA

RSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSARSA 4 7
123
56 N00°00'20"E2836.87'
S89°45'09"E197.52'N00°00'39"E220.00'N00°03'02"E685.65' N89°54'39"E836.59' N89°55'52"E712.37'
S00°02'08"E698.95'N89°15'17"W248.37'S00°06'39"E1426.74' N87°50'17"E1353.37'
N88°53'10"E1294.91'
N88°15'35"W240.68'
S74°29'39"W520.83'
N01°31'19"W577.05'S89°20'24"W670.68'
N00°04'26"E440.90'
S89°47'06"W1573.14'
N00°02'11"E2065.41'
S80°06'25"E674.77'
N89°58'24"E1109.47'
S88°41'30"E695.68'S03°02'19"W219.29'N89°32'58"E174.84'S00°17'36"E926.85' S00°01'11"W2648.38'S89°53'38"W269.14'S28°26'51"E1193.21' S89°22'29"W649.87'
N00°27'53"W648.05'
S00°21'01"E1137.11'
N22°41'06"W275.17'N00°03'18"E1062.28'N89°36'25"E295.84'S59°00'33"E49.19'S27°31'40"E898.44' N89°58'00"W623.41'N00°43'41"W479.97'N00°09'08"W383.03'
N00°27'02"W640.37'
N28°34'56"W1184.84'
N00°06'39"W695.33'
S89°39'46"E85.54'
N00°34'05"E617.32'
S00°16'11"E667.45'S00°08'11"E814.49'
N00°04'07"W299.24'N28°24'22"W2251.63'
L= 65.11'R=1125.16'
8 RUNWAY 14LAT: 36° 19' 22.68" NLONG: 119° 37' 54.65" WEL. = 239.5' (High Pt., TDZE)RUNWAY 14PROTECTION ZONE500' x 700' x 1,000' RUNWAY 32PROTECTION ZONE500' x 700' x 1,000'
RUNWAY 32LAT: 36° 18' 37.67" NLONG: 119° 37' 24.48" WEL. = 237.5' (Low Pt.) 10th Avenue
Glendale Road
Airport Access Road
Hanford Armona Road
Hanford Armona Rd.
9th Avenue
State Highway 198
Third St. (Frontage Road)
E. 4th St.

E. 4th St.

E. 3rd St.
9 3/4 Ave
Airport Access Road
RUNWAY 14FUTURE DISPLACED THRESHOLDLAT: 36° 19' 20.08" N (est.)LONG: 119° 37' 52.90" W (est.)EL. = 239.5' (est.) F2
F1
F3
F4
F5

RPZRPZRPZRPZ

RPZRPZRPZRPZ
RPZ
RPZ
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
250
250
250
250
Union Pacific Railroad
East Lacey Blvd.

Miller Street
Jessie Ave.

State Highway 198
E. 4th St.E. 6th St.

EXHIBIT 'A' PROPERTY MAP
8OF
NO.REVISIONSPONSORDATE
DATE:SHEETDESIGN:DRAWN:The preparation of this document may have been supported, in part, through the Airport Improvement Program financial assistance from the Federal Aviation Administration(Project Number Unassigned) as provided under Title 49 U.S.C., Section 47104. The contents do not in any way constitute a commitment on the part of the United States toparticipate in any development depicted therein nor does it indicate that the proposed development is environmentally acceptable or would have justification in accordance withappropriate public laws. 133 Aviation Boulevard, Suite 100Santa Rosa, California 95403(707) 526-5010Fax (707) 526-9721www.meadhunt.com

HANFORD MUNICIPAL AIRPORTHANFORD, CALIFORNIA
BMTE/BR/BMJuly 20168
513A Update, Fuel island relocation.Mead & HuntJul. 20164Future hangar locationsMead & HuntOct. 20093 Taxiway A RealignmentMead & HuntNov. 20052Lat./Long correction, Property acquisition, Pavement removalMay 20011Runway extension construction Dec. 2000 MAGNETIC DECLINATION 13° 59' EANNUAL CHANGE: 0°5' WESTMARCH 20150 FEET300600

TRUEMAGNETIC
ACRESASSESSORS PARCELNUMBERDATE ACQUIREDTYPE OF INTERESTFAA GRANTNUMBEREXISTING AIRPORT PARCEL DATA016-160-0331.7 Fee Simple1 8/27/2001 PARCEL ID #RECORDINGINFORMATION2002R0116783 09 GRANTORBrady & Jeanne High 016-160-0341.1 Fee Simple2 10/5/2001 2002R0119778 09 Allen Alves 016-160-0321.3 Fee Simple3 1/9/2002 2003R0200527 10 Frank & Olga DeBrum 119.8Fee Simple4 12/4/1996 1997R9625075 05 Barrie B Costa Trust 6.9 Fee Simple5 1/30/1998 06Fee Simple6 0636.2Fee Simple7 12/19/2000 2001R0022992 09130.5Fee Simple8 N/A N/AN/A016-032-013, 016-032-050,016-032-022, 016-041-021,016-041-025,016-160-049, 016-160-050016-160-019, 016-160-043016-160-020, 016-160-047,016-047-048 Laurie S Lopez, Saturnino &Rose JiminezRalph & Sara Alcala Fam. Trust1999R9801819,1999R9801820Purchased withCity Funds

SEE 'AVIGATIONEASEMENT INSET'

AVIGATION EASEMENT INSET
ACRESPARCEL ID #TYPE OF INTEREST(FUTURE)FUTURE AIRPORT PARCELS28.1Fee SimpleF117.7Fee SimpleF24.0Fee SimpleF3132.2Fee SimpleF48.4Avigation EasementF60.9Fee SimpleF5 EXHIBIT 'A' NOTES·Airport property boundary and data source: City of Hanford. Property line retained from previous ALP. Airportboundary and individual parcels are not surveyed and therefore should not be considered a precise legaldescription. Best available data used.·Total existing airport property equals ±297 acres. Total future airport property equals ±480 acres with 8.4 acreavigation easement.Acreage for individual parcels based on digital line work.These parcels were acquired as part of the original development of the airport. However, City records are incomplete. This data is not available. The title research needed to provide this data is beyond the scope of this ALP update. a
a

AIRPORT REFERENCE POINT

BUILDING - ON AIRPORT

ACTIVE AIRFIELD PAVEMENTAIRPORT PROPERTY RUNWAY SAFETY AREA (RSA)BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE (BRL)RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONE (RPZ)RUNWAY OBJECT FREE AREA (ROFA)OBSTACLE FREE ZONE (OFZ) RPZ
OFZBRL

EXISTINGFUTURE

PUBLIC ROADAIRPORT SERVICE ROADBUILDING - OFF AIRPORTWIND CONE PRECISION APPROACH PATH INDICATOR (PAPI)BEACON 250TERRAIN CONTOUR

DRAWING LEGEND

AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVING SYSTEM (ASOS)
AVIGATION EASEMENTNo Change

SEGMENTED CIRCLE RUNWAY LIGHTS (EDGE / THRESHOLD / REIL)TAXIWAY / LANE MARKING No ChangeNo ChangeNo ChangeNo ChangeNo Change//
+++++++
No ChangeNo ChangeNo ChangeNo ChangeNo Change
INTERNAL LEASE ++++++N/AN/A
RSA
ROFA
531632SECTION CORNER MARKERNo Change
NPIAS/FEDERAL AGREEMENTS IN PLACE1. National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS)2. Grant agreements under FAAP/ADAP/AIP3. Assurance pursuant to Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964

PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVEDN/A
b
bbb

Page 384 of 698 ends

ATTACHMENT 3

STANDARD DOT TITLE VI ASSURANCES

HANFORD MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

HANFORD, KINGS COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Page 385 of 698 ends

ATTACHMENT NO. 3

STANDARD DOT TITLE VI ASSURANCES

The City of Hanford (hereinafter referred to as the Sponsor) hereby agrees that as a condition to receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department of Transportation (DOT), it will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.) and all requirements imposed by 49 CFR Part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation -- Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (hereinafter referred to as the "Regulations") to the end that no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which the applicant receives Federal financial assistance and will immediately take any measures necessary to effectuate this agreement. Without limiting the above general assurance, the Sponsor agrees concerning this grant that:

1. Each "program" and "facility" (as defined in Sections 21.23(e) and 21.23(b)) will be conducted or operated in compliance with all requirements of the Regulations.

2. It will insert the clauses of Attachment 1 of this assurance in every contract subject to the Act and the Regulations.

3. Where Federal financial assistance is received to construct a facility, or part of a facility, the assurance shall extend to the entire facility and facilities operated in connection therewith.

4. Where Federal financial assistance is in the form or for the acquisi tion of real property or an interest in real property, the assurance shall extend to rights to space on, over, or under such property.

5. It will include the appropriate clauses set forth in Attachment 2 of this assurance, as a covenant running with the land, in any future deeds, leases, permits, licenses, and similar agreements entered into by the Sponsor with other parties:

(a) for the subsequent transfer of real property acquired or improved with Federal financial assistance under this Project; and

(b) for the construction or use of or access to space on, over, or under real property acquired or improved with Federal financial assistance under this Project.

6. This assurance obligates the Sponsor for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended to the program, except where the Federal financial assistance is to provide, or is in the form of personal property or real property or interest th erein or structures or improvements thereon, in which case the assurance obligates the sponsor or any transferee for the longer of the following periods:

(a) The period during which the property is used for a purpose for which Federal financial assistance is extended, or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits; or

(b) The period during which the Sponsor retains ownership or possession of the property.

7. It will provide for such methods of administration for the program as are found by the Secretary of Transportation or the official to whom he delegates specific authority to give reasonable guarantee that it, other sponsors, subgrantees, contractors, subcontractors, transferees, successors in interest, and other participants of Federal financial assistance under such program will comply with all requirements imposed or pursuant to the Act, the Regulations, and this assurance.

8. It agrees that the United States has a right to seek judicial enforcement with regard to any matter arising under the Act, the Regulations, and this assurance.

Page 386 of 698 ends

THIS ASSURANCE is given in consideration of and for the purpose of obtaining Federal financial assistance for this Project and is binding on its contractors, the sponsor, subcontractors, transferees, successors in interest and other participants in the Project. The person or persons whose signatures appear below are authorized to sign this assurance on behalf of the Sponsor.

DATED

CITY OF HANFORD
(Sponsor)

By
Robert Loogman, Airport Manager

Page 387 of 698 ends

STANDARD DOT TITLE VI ASSURANCES 8/29/96

CONTRACTOR CONTRACTUAL REQUIREMENTS

ATTACHMENT 1

During the performance of this contract, the contractor, for itself, its assignees and successors in interest (hereinafter referred to as the "contractor") agrees as follows:

1. Compliance with Regulations
. The contractor shall comply with the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination in federally assisted programs of the Department of Transportation (hereinafter, "DOT") Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21, as they may be amended from time to time (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations), which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract.

2. Nondiscrimination
. The contractor, with regard to the work performed by it during the contract, shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurements of materials and leases of equ ipment. The contractor shall not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the Regulations, including employment practices when the contract covers a program set forth in Appendix B of the Regulations.

3. Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurements of Materials and Equipment . In all solicitations
either by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the contractor for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurements of materials or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the contractor of the contractor's obligations under this contract and the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin.

4. Information and Reports
. The contractor shall provide all information and reports required by the Regulations or directives issued pursuant thereto and shall permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by the Sponsor or the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Regulations, orders, and instructions. Where any information required of a contractor is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, the contractor shall so certify to the sponsor or the FAA, as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information.

5. Sanctions for Noncompliance
. In the event of the contractor's non-compliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of this contract, the sponsor shall impose such contract sanctions as it or the FAA may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to:

a. Withholding of payments to the contractor under the contract until the contractor complies, and/or

b. Cancellation, termination, or suspension of the contract, in whole or in part.

6. Incorporation of Provisions. The contractor shall include the provisions of paragraphs 1 through 5 in every subcontract, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations or directives issued pursuant thereto. The contractor shall take such action with respect to any subcontract or procurement as the sponsor or the FAA may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, however, that in the event a contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or supplier as a result of such direction, the contractor may request the Sponsor to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the sponsor and, in addition, the contractor may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States.

Page 388 of 698 ends

STANDARD DOT TITLE VI ASSURANCES 8/29/96

CLAUSES FOR DEEDS, LICENSES, LEASES, PERMITS OR SIMILAR

INSTRUMENTS

ATTACHMENT 2

The following clauses shall be included in deeds, licenses, leases, permits, or similar instruments entered into by the Sponsor pursuant to the provisions of Assurances 5(a) and 5(b).

1. The (grantee, licensee, lessee, permittee, etc., as appropriate) for himself, his heirs, personal representatives, successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree (in the case of deeds and leases add "as a covenant running with the land") that in the event facilities are constructed, maintained, or otherwise operated on the said property described in this (deed, license, lease, permit, etc.) for a purpose for which a DOT program or activity is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits, the (grantee, licensee, lessee, permittee, etc.) shall maintain and operate such facilities and services in compliance with all other requirements imposed pursuant to 49 CFR Part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation, and as said Regulations may be amended.

2. The (grantee, licensee, lessee, permittee, etc., as appropriate) for himself, his personal representatives, successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree (in the case of deeds and leases add "as a covenant running with the land") that: (1) no person on the grounds of race, color, or national origin shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the use of said facilities, (2) that in the construction of any improvements on, over, or under such land and the furnishing of services thereon, no person on the grounds of race, color, or national origin shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination, (3) that the (grantee, licensee, lessee, permittee, etc.) shall use the premises in compliance with all other requirements imposed by or pursuant to 49 CFR Part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted Programs of the Departme nt of Transportation, and as said Regulations may be amended.

Page 389 of 698 ends

ATTACHMENT 4

SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (SAM)

HANFORD MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

HANFORD, KINGS COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Page 390 of 698 ends

CITY OF HANFORD
Unique Entity ID
DJUXR18MN678

CAGE / NCAGE
5HPF3
Purpose of Registration
All Awards
Registration Status
Active Registration
Expiration Date
May 30, 2024
Physical Address
319 N Douty ST
Hanford, California 93230-3951
United States
Mailing Address
317 N Douty ST
Hanford, California 93230-3951
United States
Business Information
Doing Business as
(blank)
Division Name
City Of Hanford
Division Number
(blank)
Congressional District
California 22
State / Country of Incorporation
(blank) / (blank)
URL
http://www.cityofhanfordca.com
Registration Dates
Activation Date
Jun 2, 2023
Submission Date
May 31, 2023
Initial Registration Date
Jun 8, 2009
Entity Dates
Entity Start Date
Jan 1, 1898
Fiscal Year End Close Date
Jun 30
Immediate Owner
CAGE
(blank)
Legal Business Name
(blank)
Highest Level Owner
CAGE
(blank)
Legal Business Name
(blank)
Executive Compensation
Registrants in the System for Award Management (SAM) respond to the Executive Compensation questions in accordance with Section 6202 of P.L. 110-252, amending the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (P.L. 109-282). This information is not displayed in SAM. It is sent to USAspending.gov for display in association with an eligible award. Maintaining an active registration in SAM demonstrates the registrant responded to the questions.

Proceedings Questions
Registrants in the System for Award Management (SAM.gov) respond to proceedings questions in accordance with FAR 52.209-7, FAR 52.209-9, or 2. C.F.R. 200 Appendix XII. Their responses are displayed in the responsibility/qualification section of SAM.gov. Maintaining an active registration in SAM.gov demonstrates the registrant responded to the proceedings questions.

Exclusion Summary
Active Exclusions Records?
No
SAM Search Authorization
I authorize my entity's non-sensitive information to be displayed in SAM public search results:

Yes
Entity Types
Business Types
Entity Structure
U.S. Government Entity
Entity Type
US Local Government
Organization Factors
(blank)
Profit Structure
(blank)
Last updated by SANDRA LERMAMARTINEZ on May 31, 2023 at 12:40 PM CITY OF HANFORD Jul 25, 2023 06:59:00 PM GMT
https://sam.gov/entity/DJUXR18MN678/coreData?status=Active Page 1 of 2

Page 391 of 698 ends

Socio-Economic Types
Check the registrant's Reps & Certs, if present, under FAR 52.212-3 or FAR 52.219-1 to determine if the entity is an SBA-certified HUBZone small business concern. Additional small business information may be found in the SBA's Dynamic Small Business Search if the entity completed the SBA supplemental pages during registration.

Government Types
U.S. Local Government
City
Other Government Entities
Housing Authorities Public/Tribal
Planning Commission
Financial Information
Accepts Credit Card Payments
No
Debt Subject To Offset
Yes
EFT Indicator
0000
CAGE Code
5HPF3
Points of Contact
Electronic Business

SANDRA LERMA
317 N Douty ST
Hanford, California 93230
United States
Erik Brotemarkle, Battalion Chief 350 West Grangeville BLVD.

Hanford, California 93230
United States
Government Business
Mario Cifuentez II, City Manager
319 N. Douty ST
Hanford, California 93230
United States
SANDRA LERMA 317 N Douty ST
Hanford, California 93230
United States
Past Performance

ERIK BROTEMARKLE, BATTALION CHIEF
350 W. Grangeville BLVD
Hanford , California 93230
United States
BARBARA MARTY 317 N Douty ST
Hanford, California 93230
United States
Service Classifications
NAICS Codes
Primary
Yes
NAICS Codes
921110
NAICS Title
Executive Offices
Disaster Response
This entity does not appear in the disaster response registry.

Last updated by SANDRA LERMAMARTINEZ on May 31, 2023 at 12:40 PM CITY OF HANFORD Jul 25, 2023 06:59:00 PM GMT
https://sam.gov/entity/DJUXR18MN678/coreData?status=Active Page 2 of 2

Page 392 of 698 ends

ATTACHMENT 5

SPONSOR CERTIFICATIONS

HANFORD MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

HANFORD, KINGS COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

This attachment consists of the following Sponsor Certifications:

Drug-Free Workplace
Selection of Consultants
Potential Conflicts of Interests

Page 393 of 698 ends

FAA Form 5100-130
U.S. Department
of Transportation
Federal Aviation
Administration
FAA Form 5100-130, Drug-Free Workplace – Airport Improvement Program Sponsor Certification
Paperwork Reduction Act Burden Statement
A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is 2120-0569. Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 8 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, completing and reviewing the collection of information. All responses to this collection of information are required under 49 U.S.C. Section 47105 to retain a benefit and to meet the reporting requirements of 2 CFR 200. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to: Information Collection Clearance Officer, Federal Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177-1524.

Page 394 of 698 ends

FAA Form 5100-130 (8/20) SUPERSEDES PREVIOUS EDITION Page 1 of 3 U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration
OMB CONTROL NUMBER: 2120-0569
EXPIRATION DATE: 6/30/2023
Drug-Free Workplace
Airport Improvement Program Sponsor Certification
Sponsor:

Airport:

Project Number:

Description of Work:

Application
49 USC § 47105(d) authorizes the Secretary to require certification from the sponsor that it will comply with the statutory and administrative requirements in carrying out a project under the Airport Improvement Program (AIP). General requirements on the drug-free workplace within federal grant programs are described in 2 CFR part 182. Sponsors are required to certify they will be, or will continue to provide, a drug-free workplace in accordance with the regulation. The AIP project grant agreement contains specific assurances on the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988.

Certification Statements
Except for certification statements below marked as not applicable (N/A), this list includes major
requirements of the construction proje ct. Selecting “Yes” represents sponsor acknowledgement and confirmation of the certification st atement. The term “will” means Sponsor action taken at appropriate time based on the
certification statement focus area, but no later than the end of the project period of performance. This list is not comprehensive and does not relieve the sponsor from fully complying with all applicable statutory and adminis trative standards. The source of the requirement is referenced within parent
hesis.

1. A statement has been or will be published prior to commencement of project notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the sponsor's workplace, and specifying the actions to be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition (2 CFR § 182.205).

Yes No N/A

2. An ongoing drug-free awareness program (2 CFR § 182.215) has been or will be established prior to commencement of project to inform employees about:
a. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
b. The sponsor's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; c. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and d. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace.

Yes No N/A

Page 395 of 698 ends

FAA Form 5100-130 (8/20) SUPERSEDES PREVIOUS EDITION Page 2 of 3

3. Each employee to be engaged in the performance of the work has been or will be given a copy of the statement required within item 1 above prior to commencement of project (2 CFR § 182.210).

Yes No N/A

4. Employees have been or will be notified in the statement required by item 1 above that, as a condition employment under the grant (2 CFR § 182.205(c)), the employee will:
a.

Abide by the terms of the statement; and
b. Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction.

Yes No N/A

5. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) will be notified in writing within 10 calendar days after receiving notice under item 4b above from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction (2 CFR § 182.225). Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title of the employee, to the FAA (2 CFR § 182.300).

Yes No N/A

6. One of the following actions (2 CFR § 182.225(b)) will be taken within 30 calendar days of receiving a notice under item 4b above with respect to any employee who is so convicted:
a.

Take appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; and
b.

Require such employee to participate satisfactorily in drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation programs approved for such purposes by a federal, state, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency.

Yes No N/A

7. A good faith effort will be made, on a continuous basis, to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of items 1 through 6 above (2 CFR § 182.200).

Yes No N/A
Site(s) of performance of work (2 CFR § 182.230):

Location 1
Name of Location:

Address:

Location 2 (if applicable)
Name of Location:

Address:

Location 3 (if applicable)
Name of Location:

Address:

Page 396 of 698 ends

FAA Form 5100-130 (8/20) SUPERSEDES PREVIOUS EDITION Page 3 of 3 Attach documentation clarifying any above item marked with a “No” response.

Sponsor’s Certification
I certify, for the project identified herein, responses to the forgoing items are accurate as marked and additional documentation for any item marked “no” is correct and complete.

Executed on this day of , .

Name of Sponsor:

Name of Sponsor’s Authorized Official:

Title of Sponsor’s Authorized Official:

Signature of Sponsor’s Authorized Official:

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. I understand that knowingly and willfully providing false information to the federal government is a violation of 18 USC § 1001 (False Statements) and could subject me to fines, imprisonment, or both.

Page 397 of 698 ends

FAA Form 5100-134
U.S. Department
of Transportation
Federal Aviation
Administration
FAA Form 5100-134, Selection of Consultants – Airport
Improvement Program Sponsor Certification
Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is 2120-0569. Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 8 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, completing and reviewing the collection of information. All responses to this collection of information are required under 49 U.S.C. Section 47105 to retain a benefit and to meet the reporting requirements of 2 CFR 200. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to: Information Collection Clearance Officer, Federal Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177-1524.

Page 398 of 698 ends

FAA Form 5100-134 (8/20) SUPERSEDES PREVIOUS EDITION Page 1 of 3 U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration
OMB CONTROL NUMBER: 2120-0569
EXPIRATION DATE: 6/30/2023
Selection of Consultants
Airport Improvement Program Sponsor Certification
Sponsor:

Airport:

Project Number:

Description of Work:

Application
49 USC § 47105(d) authorizes the Secretary to require certification from the sponsor that it will comply with the statutory and administrative requirements in carrying out a project under the Airport Improvement Program (AIP). General requirements for selection of consultant services within federal grant programs are described in 2 CFR §§ 200.317-200.326. Sponsors may use other qualifications-based procedures provided they are equivalent to standards of Title 40 chapter 11 and FAA Advisory Circular 150/5100-14, Architectural, Engineering, and Planning Consultant Services for Airport Grant Projects.

Certification Statements
Except for certification statements below marked as not applicable (N/A), this list includes major requirements of the construction project. Selecting “Yes” represents sponsor acknowledgement and confirmation of the certification statement. The term “will” means Sponsor action taken at appropriate time based on the certification statement focus area, but no later than the end of the project period of performance. This list is not comprehensive and does not relieve the sponsor from fully complying with all applicable statutory and administrative standards. The source of the requirement is referenced within parenthesis.

1. Sponsor acknowledges their responsibility for the settlement of all contractual and administrative issues arising out of their procurement actions (2 CFR § 200.318(k)).

Yes No N/A

2. Sponsor procurement actions ensure or will ensure full and open competition that does not unduly limit competition (2 CFR § 200.319).

Yes No N/A

3. Sponsor has excluded or will exclude any entity that develops or drafts specifications, requirements, or statements of work associated with the development of a request-for- qualifications (RFQ) from competing for the advertised services (2 CFR § 200.319).

Yes No N/A

Page 399 of 698 ends

FAA Form 5100-134 (8/20) SUPERSEDES PREVIOUS EDITION Page 2 of 3

4. The advertisement describes or will describe specific project statements-of-work that provide clear detail of required services without unduly restricting competition (2 CFR § 200.319).

Yes No N/A

5. Sponsor has publicized or will publicize a RFQ that:
a. Solicits an adequate number of qualified sources (2 CFR § 200.320(d)); and b. Identifies all evaluation criteria and relative importance (2 CFR § 200.320(d)).

Yes No N/A

6. Sponsor has based or will base selection on qualifications, experience, and disadvantaged business enterprise participation with price not being a selection factor (2 CFR § 200.320(d)).

Yes No N/A

7. Sponsor has verified or will verify that agreements exceeding $25,000 are not awarded to individuals or firms suspended, debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in federally assisted projects (2 CFR §180.300).

Yes No N/A

8. A/E services covering multiple projects: Sponsor has agreed to or will agree to:
a. Refrain from initiating work covered by this procurement beyond five years from the date of selection (AC 150/5100-14); and
b.

Retain the right to conduct new procurement actions for projects identified or not identified in the RFQ (AC 150/5100-14).

Yes No N/A

9. Sponsor has negotiated or will negotiate a fair and reasonable fee with the firm they select as most qualified for the services identified in the RFQ (2 CFR § 200.323).

Yes No N/A

10. The Sponsor’s contract identifies or will identify costs associated with ineligible work separately from costs associated with eligible work (2 CFR § 200.302).

Yes No N/A

11. Sponsor has prepared or will prepare a record of negotiations detailing the history of the procurement action, rationale for contract type and basis for contract fees (2 CFR §200.318(i)).

Yes No N/A

12. Sponsor has incorporated or will incorporate mandatory contact provisions in the consultant contract for AIP-assisted work (49 U.S.C. Chapter 471 and 2 CFR part 200 Appendix II) Yes No N/A

Page 400 of 698 ends

FAA Form 5100-134 (8/20) SUPERSEDES PREVIOUS EDITION Page 3 of 3

13. For contracts that apply a time-and-material payment provision (also known as hourly rates, specific rates of compensation, and labor rates), the Sponsor has established or will establish:
a. Justification that there is no other suitable contract method for the services (2 CFR §200.318(j));
b. A ceiling price that the consultant exceeds at their risk (2 CFR §200.318(j)); and c. A high degree of oversight that assures consultant is performing work in an efficient manner with effective cost controls in place 2 CFR §200.318(j)).

Yes No N/A

14. Sponsor is not using or will not use the prohibited cost-plus-percentage-of-cost (CPPC) contract method. (2 CFR § 200.323(d)).

Yes No N/A
Attach documentation clarifying any above item marked with “no” response.

Executed on this day of , .

Name of Sponsor:

Name of Sponsor’s Authorized Official:

Title of Sponsor’s Authorized Official:

Signature of Sponsor’s Authorized Official:

Page 401 of 698 ends

FAA Form 5100-135
U.S. Department
of Transportation
Federal Aviation
Administration
FAA Form 5100 -135, Certification and Disclosure Regarding Potential Conflicts of Interest – Airport Improvement Program Sponsor Certification
Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is 2120-0569. Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 8 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, completing and reviewing the collection of information. All responses to this collection of information are required under 49 U.S.C. Section 47105 to retain a benefit and to meet the reporting requirements of 2 CFR 200. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to: Information Collection Clearance Officer, Federal Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177-1524.

Page 402 of 698 ends

FAA Form 5100-135 (8/20) SUPERSEDES PREVIOUS EDITION Page 1 of 2 U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration
OMB CONTROL NUMBER: 2120-0569
EXPIRATION DATE: 6/30/2023
Certification and Disclosure Regarding Potential Conflicts of Interest Airport Improvement Program Sponsor Certification
Sponsor:

Airport:

Project Number:

Description of Work:

Application
Title 2 CFR § 200.112 and § 1201.112 address Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements for conflict of interest. As a condition of eligibility under the Airport Improvement Program (AIP), sponsors must comply with FAA policy on conflict of interest. Such a conflict would arise when any of the following have a financial or other interest in the firm selected for award:
a)
The employee, officer or agent,
b) Any member of his immediate family,
c) His or her partner, or
d) An organization which employs, or is about to employ, any of the above.

Selecting “Yes” represents sponsor or sub-recipient acknowledgement and confirmation of the certification statement. Selecting “No” represents sponsor or sub-recipient disclosure that it cannot fully comply with the certification statement. If “No” is selected, provide support information explaining the negative response as an attachment to this form. This includes whether the sponsor has established standards for financial interest that are not substantial or unsolicited gifts are of nominal value (2 CFR § 200.318(c)). The term “will” means Sponsor action taken at appropriate time based on the certification statement focus area, but no later than the end of the project period of performance.

Certification Statements

1. The sponsor or sub-recipient maintains a written standards of conduct governing conflict of interest and the performance of their employees engaged in the award and administration of contracts (2 CFR § 200.318(c)). To the extent permitted by state or local law or regulations, such standards of conduct provide for penalties, sanctions, or other disciplinary actions for violations of such standards by the sponsor’s and sub-recipient’s officers, employees, or agents, or by contractors or their agents.

Yes No

Page 403 of 698 ends

FAA Form 5100-135 (8/20) SUPERSEDES PREVIOUS EDITION Page 2 of 2

2. The sponsor’s or sub-recipient’s officers, employees or agents have not and will not solicit or accept gratuities, favors or anything of monetary value from contractors, potential contractors, or parties to sub-agreements (2 CFR § 200.318(c)).

Yes No

3. The sponsor or sub-recipient certifies that is has disclosed and will disclose to the FAA any known potential conflict of interest (2 CFR § 1200.112).

Yes No
Attach documentation clarifying any above item marked with “no” response.

Sponsor’s Certification
I certify, for the project identified herein, responses to the forgoing items are accurate as marked and have the explanation for any item marked “no” is correct and complete.

Executed on this day of , .

Name of Sponsor:

Name of Sponsor’s Authorized Official:

Title of Sponsor’s Authorized Official:

Signature of Sponsor’s Authorized Official:

Page 404 of 698 ends

11.D.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 7/2/2024 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Approval of a Change Order to increase the fiscal year 2023/2024 Purchase Order limit with CleanCut Landscape by $17,000.50 to provide landscaping services for Landscape Assessment Districts (LAD) for a total contract amount of $60,365.02.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, approve a change order to increase the fiscal year 2023/2024 Purchase Order limit with CleanCut Landscape by $17,000.50 to provide landscaping services for Landscape Assessment Districts (LAD) for a total contract amount of $60,365.02.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Hanford established Landscape Assessment Districts (LADs) in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. Since 1990 the City of Hanford has established a total of 43 separate districts. Each of those districts has landscaping maintenance needs, and that service has been contracted to Clean Cut Landscape. The districts have been separated into four (4) geographic quadrants, spread throughout the town. As community development increases, new districts are serviced and added to the LAD's Quadrant.

The change order is for Quadrant 4 with an original purchase order amount of $43,364.52. The change order request will increase the Quadrant 4 Purchase Order to $60,365.02. The increase is due to the addition of new LAD’s into the quadrant that are being serviced by Clean Cut Landscaping. Purchases over $50,000 require City Council approval.

After communicating with our department administration, city clerk, communication with the vendor, and reviewing the files in the system, we were unable to locate that agreement. The contractor stated that they cannot locate that agreement at this time. The City of Hanford awarded all Quadrants to Clean Cut Landscaping, for a month-to-month contract extension, this is to have occurred in 2021, meeting minutes have been provided in attachments to reflect the action.

A service agreement with Clean Cut Landscape Management was recently approved by Council on December 5th, 2023, the agreement will take effect July 1, 2024 and reflect the new LAD additions and bulk purchase order amounts for each Quadrant.

FISCAL IMPACT:

This change order will increase the LAD Quadrant 4 purchase order by $17,000.50 for a total of $60365.02, which is funded by the LAD assessments collected each year. The funding for the

Page 405 of 698 ends

landscape services, and supporting utilities, comes from each of the individual district’s assessments collected each year as part of the property taxes within the district.

If approved, the change order will cover the expenses for fiscal year 2023/2024. A new service contract will take effect July 1, 2024 that was approved separately by City Council in December 2023.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. PURCHASE ORDER FOR QUADRANT 4. CLEAN CUT.

2. Agenda - Tuesday January 19 2021 (002) (1)

3. 2021-01-19 City Council - Full Minutes-1712

4. AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES CLEAN CUT 2024 AGREEMENT

Page 406 of 698 ends

Fiscal Year

THIS NUMBER MUST APPEAR ON ALL INVOICES, PACKAGES AND
SHIPPING PAPERS.

Purchase
Order #
Delivery must be made within doors of specified
destination.

B
I
L
L
T
O
Purchase Order
V
E
N
D
O
R
S
H
I
P
T
O
Vendor Phone Number Vendor Fax Number Requisition Number Delivery Reference Date Ordered Vendor
Number Date Required Freight Method/Terms Department/Location Item# Description/PartNo QTY UOM Unit Price Extended Price By:

City Manager

CONTINUED ON

NEXT PAGE
VENDOR COP
Y
2024 Page: 1 of: 3
22400546

CITY OF HANFORD
Accounts Payable
315 N. Douty St
Hanford, CA 93230
Email: [email protected]

CLEAN CUT LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT INC
1865 HERNDON AVE #K636
CLOVIS, CA 93611

CITY OF HANFORD-PARKS & COMM
321 N DOUTY ST #B
HANFORD, CA 93230
Phone: 559-585-2525
12400672
03/25/2024 104524 PARKS & REC-PARKS
BPO/L
AD MAINTENANCE QUADRANT #4
The Above Purchase Order Number Must Appear On All
Correspondence - Packing Sheets And Bills Of Lading
1 EA1.0 $106.56$106.560243 HYDE
PARK
GL Account: 0243 - 755000 $106.56
2 EA1.0 $569.76$569.760244 SIERRA VISTA
GL Account: 0244 - 755000 $569.76
3 EA1.0 $1,226.34$1,226.340248 WALNUT FORES
T
GL Account: 0248 - 755000 $1,226.34
4 EA1.0 $282.78$282.780248 WALNUT FOREST SLOUGH ST FRONTAGE GL Account: 0248 - 755000 $282.78
5 EA1.0 $268.68
$268.680252 ROSEWOOD ESTATES
GL Account: 0252 - 755000 $268.68
6 EA1.0 $3,862.14$3,862.140254 COUNTRY CROSSING
GL Account: 0254 - 755000 $3,862.14
7 EA1.0 $2,74

7.70$2,747.700256 MT VIEW ESTATES
GL Account: 0256 - 755000 $2,747.70
8 EA1.0 $5,334.00$5,334.000261 ASHTON PARK

Page 407 of 698 ends

By:

City Manager

CONTINUED ON

NEXT PAGE
VENDOR COPY
Fisca
l Year

THIS NUMBER MUST APPEAR ON ALL INVOICES, PACKAGES AND
SHIPPING PAPERS.

Purchase
Order #
Delivery must be made within doors of specified
destination.

B
I
L
L
T
O
Purchase Order
V
E
N
D
O
R
S
H
I
P
T
O
Vendor Phone Number Vendor Fax Number Requisition Number Delivery Reference Date Ordered
Vendor Number Date Required Freight Method/Terms Department/Location Item# Description/PartNo QTY UOM Unit Price Extended Price *************** GL SUMMARY ***************
2024 Page: 2 of: 3
22400546

CITY OF HANFORD
Accounts Payable
315 N. Douty St
Hanford, CA 93230
Email: [email protected]

CLEAN CUT LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT INC
1865 HERNDON AVE
#K636
CLOVIS, CA 93611

CITY OF HANFORD-PARKS & COMM
321 N DOUTY ST #B
HANFORD, CA 93230
Phone: 559-585-2525
12400672
03/25/2024 104524 PARKS & REC-PARKS
GL Account:
0261 - 755000 $5,334.00
9 EA1.0 $1,107.06$1,107.060263 SIDONIA I
GL Account: 0263 - 755000 $1,107.06
10 EA1.0 $1,013.52$1,013.520263 SIDONIA II
GL Account: 0263
- 755000 $1,013.52
11 EA1.0 $4,461.66$4,461.660271 INDEPENDENCE I & II
GL Account: 0271 - 755000 $4,461.66
12 EA1.0 $9,325.32$9,325.320273 INDEPENDENCE III &
IV
GL Account: 0273 - 755000 $9,325.32
13 EA1.0 $1,081.50$1,081.500272 GREENBRIER #876
GL Account: 0272 - 755000 $1,081.50
14 EA1.0 $2,317.50$2,317.500277 MYNDERUP
GL
Account: 0277 - 755000 $2,317.50
15 EA1.0 $9,660.00$9,660.000272 ADDT'N HIDDEN OAKS
GL Account: 0272 - 755000 $9,660.00
0243 - 755000 $106.56
0244 - 755000 $569.
76

Page 408 of 698 ends

By:

City Manager VENDOR COPY
Fiscal Year

THIS NUMBER MUST APPEAR ON ALL INVOICES, PACKAGES AND
SHIPPING PAPERS.

Purchase
Order #
Delivery must be made within doors of specified
destination.

B
I
L
L
T
O
Purchase Order
V
E
N
D
O
R
S
H
I
P
T
O
Vendor Phone Number Vendor Fax Number Requisition Numb
er Delivery Reference
Date Ordered Vendor Number Date Required Freight Method/Terms Department/Location Item# Description/PartNo QTY UOM Unit Price Extended Price Total Ext. Price $43,364.52
PO Total $43,364.52
2024 Page: 3 of: 3
22400546

CITY OF HANFORD
Accounts Payable
315 N. Douty St
Hanford, CA 93230
Email: [email protected]

CLEAN CUT

LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT INC
1865 HERNDON AVE #K636
CLOVIS, CA 93611

CITY OF HANFORD-PARKS & COMM
321 N DOUTY ST #B
HANFORD, CA 93230
Phone: 559-585-2525
12400672
03/25/2024 10452
4 PARKS & REC-PARKS
0248 - 755000 $1,509.12
0252 - 755000 $268.68
0254 - 755000 $3,862.14
0256 - 755000 $2,747.70
0261 - 755000 $5,334.00
0263 - 755000 $2,12

0.58 0271 - 755000 $4,461.66
0272 - 755000 $10,741.50
0273 - 755000 $9,325.32
0277 - 755000 $2,317.50

Page 409 of 698 ends

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 1/19/2021

AGENDA SECTION: B

SUBJECT:

Parks and Community Services: Rejection of all bids for Citywide Maintenance of Landscape Assessment Districts, Approval of a month-to-month contract extension with Clean Cut Landscaping to continue landscape maintenance within Quadrants 1-4, and approval of a Sole Source Contract with Willdan Financial for services to analyze and make recommendations for LAD’s.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council, by motion, take the following actions:

1. Reject the bids from all vendors for the maintenance of the 39 Landscape Assessment Districts for calendar years 2021 and 2022.

2. Approve the Extension of the current contract with Clean Cut Landscape Maintenance, for the same contract prices, on a month to month basis for the maintenance of 39 Landscape Assessment Districts.

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute a sole-source contract with Willdan Financial Service, in an amount not to exceed $60,000 for the reasons stated below and appropriate funding.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Hanford, under the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (“1972 Act”) and in compliance with the substantive and procedural requirements of the California State Constitution, Article XIIID (“California Constitution”) annually levies and collects special assessments for the City’s maintenance assessment district. Annually, the City Engineer prepares a report that details the assessment amount and level of service for each district.

14.B
Packet Pg. 97

Page 410 of 698 ends

The purpose of this assessment is to provide funding for the maintenance of the common landscaping (mowing, planting, replanting of plants and trees, sprinkler maintenance etc.) within each district. Currently we have a total of 39 LADs within the City limits organized into four quadrants (See attached LAD Map).

In addition, each district is assigned a level of service, which defines the frequency of maintenance, as defined below:

Beginning in 1990, the Landscape Assessment Districts (LADs) was established. Over the past 31 years, many LADs have been added. Of the 39 LADs, 23 have a Standard Annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) escalator built into the assessment, which allows the City to increase the assessment in accordance with California Government Code section 53739(b)(1) to have sufficient funding to maintain their current level of service. Sixteen LADs do not have a CPI escalator integrated into their annual assessment.

The City of Hanford currently has 16 LADs operating at a deficit, ranging from $45.62 to $27,625.11 each; with a combined total deficit of $60,931.41. Past attempts to ballot these districts to increase the assessment amount or include a CPI have been unsuccessful.

As a solution, staff has contacted Willdan Financial Services to assist the City in creating a strategic plan to solve this longstanding and ongoing problem. Willdan has over 55 years of experience in serving local government, including 90% of California cities and counties.

Willdan is currently conducting a pre-assessment of the LADs and will provide a proposal to:

Conduct an analysis of the Landscape Assessment Districts Re-engineer the districts
Provide Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping of each district Develop detailed balloting strategies for the underfunded LADs Develop a capital improvement reserve for each district to fund unforeseen incidents
The action to extend the current contract will allow staff the time needed conduct a complete and thorough analysis of the LADs and proactively move forward. Staff will return to Council to present a draft strategic plan to address the issues detailed above once it is completed and Council will have the opportunity to provide further direction at that time.

14.B
Packet Pg. 98

Page 411 of 698 ends

FISCAL IMPACT:

An appropriation is required in the amount of $60,000, to be funded by the Landscape Assessment Districts.

ATTACHMENTS:

LAD Map

14.B
Packet Pg. 99

Page 412 of 698 ends

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

MINUTES
January 19, 2021 7:00 PM
Hanford Civic Auditorium
400 N. Douty St
4:30 PM CALL TO ORDER STUDY AND CLOSED SESSION :

Mayor Ramirez called the Study and Closed Session to order at 4:31 p.m.

ROLL CALL BY THE CITY CLERK :

Present: Francisco Ramirez, Kalish Morrow, Diane Sharp, John Draxler, Art Brieno PUBLIC COMMENT :

This is the time for citizens to comment on subject matters not on the agenda within the jurisdiction of the Hanford City Council. This is also the public’s opportunity to request an item from the Consent Calendar be pulled for discussion purposes or to comment on any item on the agenda. Comments related to Public Hearing items will be heard at the time the item is discussed.

A maximum of three minutes is allowed for each speaker. Please begin your comments by stating your name and providing your city of residence.

None.

STUDY SESSION:

A. FIRE: Presentation of the CA-OES Engine for Council viewing Fire Chief Steve Pendergrass presented the CA OES Fire Engine for the Council to view and tour.

B. Presentation from the Kings County Association of Government (KC AG) regarding current projects and the Commission's activities
Terri King, Executive Director of Kings County Association of Government (KCAG) provided an overview of the organization. She discussed the history of the agency, commission activities, funding sources, projects, and budgets. Ms. King also discussed the preparation of the 20 -year Regional Transportation Plan, other major functions and services that KCAG provides to other agencies and the City of Hanford. With no further discussion, Mayor Ramirez thanked Ms. King for the presentation.

C. Finance: Presentation regarding the City of Hanford’s California Public Employee Retirement System (CalPERS) pension obligations and projected cost.

Page 413 of 698 ends

Interim Finance Director Eric Frost discussed CalPERS pension o bligations, the projected cost and an overview of the city’s pension plans. Dir. Frost answered questions from the Council. Mayor Ramirez thanked Dir. Frost for his presentation and adjourned to closed session 5:54 p.m.

CLOSED SESSION FOR DISCUSSION OF THE FOLLOWING:

A. Conference with Legal Counsel-Real Property Negotiation (GC 54956.8) Property: 109 E. Eighth
Agency Negotiators: Mario Cifuentez, Ty Mizote
Negotiating Party: Carnegie Museum of Kings County
CLOSED SESSION ACTION REPORT:

No action reported.

CALL TO ORDER REGULAR SESSION:

Mayor Ramirez called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL:

Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
John Draxler Council Member Present 4:12 PM
Diane Sharp Vice Mayor Present 4:09 PM
Art Brieno Council Member Present 4:10 PM
Kalish Morrow Council Member Present 4:12 PM
Francisco Ramirez Mayor Present 4:08 PM

IX. INVOCATION:

The invocation was led by Pastor Mike Weatherly.

FLAG SALUTE:

Vice Mayor Sharp led the Flag salute.

STAFF COMMUNICATIONS:

City Manager Mario Cifuentez provided a COVID -19 vaccine update. He recognized the Chamber of Commerce as a good resource for the recent new business inquires that the City has received. He also announced the upcoming date for the City Councils Goals and Objectives meeting.

COUNCIL REPORTS/COMMENTS:

Vice Mayor Sharp attended orientation meetings with the city’s department heads, she also attended online training and several community events.

Council Member Brieno had nothing to report.

Council Member Morrow attended orientations with the city’s department heads and the grand opening for Caliva.

Council Member Draxler attended the grand opening for Caliva. He also participated in Griswold LaSalle's on -line training.

Page 414 of 698 ends

Mayor Ramirez attended the grand opening for Cal iva, and he announced the monthly Hanford Chamber of Commerce event that he will be participating in.

PUBLIC COMMENT:

A maximum of three minutes is allowed for each speaker. Please begin your comments by stating your name and providing your city of residence.

Bob Ramos congratulated the new Council Members and Mayor Ramirez. He also commented on the warrant register.

CONSENT CALENDAR:

Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted in one motion.

There will be no separate discussion of these matters unless a request is made and then the item will be removed from the Consent Calendar to be discussed and voted upon by a separate motion.

Council Member Brieno requested to pull Item E [Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) Grant for Housing].

Motion to approve the Consent Calendar except for the items pulled for separate consideration.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Art Brieno, Council Member
SECONDER: John Draxler, Council Member
AYES: Draxler, Sharp, Brieno, Morrow, Ramirez
A. PROCEDURAL WAIVER: Waive reading in full of resolution and ordinances and approval and adoption of same by reading title only.

B. City Clerk: Approval of the Minutes of the October 20, 2020 Meeting C. City Clerk: Approval of the Minutes of the November 3, 2020 Meeting D. City Clerk: Denial of a claim for damages and authorization for the City Clerk to send out notification of such to Jaime Cleaves
E. Police: Second Reading of Ordinance No. 20 -15 approving the addition to Section 12.20 to Title 12 of the Municipal Code, thereby adding Rules for City Parks and City Properties to govern acceptable use of these properties by the public.

F. Public Works: Approval of a Notice of Completion for the Well 41/38 Improvement Project, and authorization for the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest and file said Notice with the Kings County Recorder's Office.

G. Finance: Acceptance of the Monthly Investment Transaction Report for December 2020

Page 415 of 698 ends

Items pulled from consent:

1. Community Development: Resolution 21 -02-R supporting an Application for Funding from the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) Program.
[Item E] Pulled by Council Member Brieno.

Senior Planner Gabrielle Myers discussed the funding application for a non -competitive grant to assist with planning initiatives and projects.

Motion to adopt Resolution 21-02-R.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Art Brieno, Council Member
SECONDER: Diane Sharp, Vice Mayor
AYES: Draxler, Sharp, Brieno, Morrow, Ramirez
GENERAL BUSINESS:

A. Parks and Community Services: Award of a contract to Bush Engineering, Inc., of Hanford, CA for the Base Bid amount of $171,152.00 for the Civic Park Playground Site Improvements and Approval of an additional appropriation of $53,909.00 from the Parks Impact Fund and an additional $47,717.00 from the Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund to fully fund the project Parks and Community Services Director Brad Albert presented the Civic Park Playground Site Improvements and clarified that the presentation is for the improvements for the approved playground structure at Civic Park.

He also provided the Council with an updated budget. Vice Mayor Sharp would like to visit the area of the park before deciding. Council Member Brieno questioned the budget and he expressed his concerns regarding the new budget. Council Member Brieno recommended that the item be tabled or rejected. He also expressed his concerns regarding existing parks that need improvements. Council Member Morrow agreed with Council Member Brieno. Council Member Draxler commented on the bid process, and he expressed concerns regarding rejecting the bid. Public Works Director John Doyel discussed the background of the project and explained that through the process, the budget has significantly increased due to the specific design of the playground. Dir.

Doyel also shared his insight into similar p rojects. With no further discussion, Mayor Ramirez invited a motion for the Council.

Motion to deny the award of contract was introduced by Council Member Brieno. Motion not seconded; motion failed.

Motion to approve the recommendation as presented was introduced by Council Member Draxler. Motion not seconded; motion failed.

Motion to table the item until February 2, 2021, was introduced by Vice Mayor Sharp. Motion seconded by Council Member Morrow.

Page 416 of 698 ends

RESULT: TABLED [4 TO 1]
MOVER: Diane Sharp, Vice Mayor
SECONDER: Kalish Morrow, Council Member
AYES: Sharp, Brieno, Morrow, Ramirez
NAYS: Draxler
B. Parks and Community Services: Rejection of all bids for Citywide Maintenance of Landscape Assessment Districts, Approval of a month -to-month contract extens ion with Clean Cut Landscaping to continue landscape maintenance within Quadrants 1 -4, and approval of a Sole Source Contract with Willdan Financial for services to analyze and make recommendations for LAD’s.

Parks and Community Services Director Brad Albe rt Presented the Land Assessment District strategy with 39 Landscape Assessment Districts throughout the City limits, that are organized into four quadrants. Dir. Albert discussed the phases, the cost, and benefits of the proposed services by Willdan Finan cial Services. The Council discussed the cost of living in the districts and the fund deficit. Vice Mayor Sharp and Council Member Draxler spoke in favor of the presented recommendations. Both Council Members Morrow and Brieno expressed their concerns regarding the cost to contract Willdan Financial, and they would like to see the item brought back to the Council in the future for review and consideration.

Motion to approve and be funded by the Landscape Assessment Districts.

RESULT: APPROVED [3 TO 2]
MOVER: John Draxler, Council Member
SECONDER: Diane Sharp, Vice Mayor
AYES: Draxler, Sharp, Ramirez
NAYS: Brieno, Morrow
C. Public Works: Appropriation of $72,409.52 from the Water Capital Reserve Fund for the advance of funding to purchase and install ne w well equipment from Valley Pump & Dairy Systems, Inc of Armona with the expectation that the funds will be reimbursed by SCE through the SCE Incentive Grant and Loan programs.

Public Works Director John Doyel briefly discussed the appropriation from the Water Capital Fund for the advance funding to purchase and install the new well equipment with the expectation that it will be recovered from the SCE Incentive Grant and Loan Program after the project is complete.

Motion to approve.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Art Brieno, Council Member
SECONDER: Kalish Morrow, Council Member
AYES: Draxler, Sharp, Brieno, Morrow, Ramirez
D. Finance: Review and Approval of Annual Report for Development Impact Fees Pertaining to City of Hanford Impact Fees for Parks, Transportation, Fire Protection, Police Protection, Storm Water System, Water System, Wastewater System, and Refuse & Recycling.

Interim Finance Director Eric Frost presented the Annual Impact Fee Report for review and consideration. Dir.

Frost invited questions from the Council.

Page 417 of 698 ends

Motion to approve the Annual Report for Development Impact Fees.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Diane Sharp, Vice Mayor
SECONDER: Art Brieno, Council Member
AYES: Draxler, Sharp, Brieno, Morrow, Ramirez
E. Council: Re ceive and discuss the list of committees and boards that have City Council representation directly appointed by the Council and make Appointments as appropriate.

Mayor Ramirez made the following appointments of Council representatives:

Parks and Recreation
Francisco Ramirez
Kalish Morrow (alternate)

Parking and Traffic Commission
John Draxler
Francisco Ramirez (alternate)

Planning Commission
Kalish Morrow
Francisco Ramirez (alternate)

League of California Cities
John Draxler
Francisco Ramirez (alternate)

Kings Economic Development Corporation
Kalish Morrow
Francisco Ramirez (alternate)

Kings County Association of Governments
Diane Sharp
Francisco Ramirez (alternate)

Kings County Area Public Transit Agency (KART)
Diane Sharp
Francisco Ramirez (alternate)

Kings County Abandoned Vehicle Authority
Diane Sharp
Francisco Ramirez (alternate)

Kings Community Action Organization (KCAO)
Francisco Ramirez
Diane Sharp (alternate)

Kings Waste and Recycling Authority (KWRA)
John Draxler
Francisco Ramirez (alternate)

Cross Valley Rail Joint Powers Authority
Diane Sharp
Kalish Morrow (alternate)

Page 418 of 698 ends

Special City Selection Committee
Diane Sharp

City County Coordination Task Force
Francisco Ramirez
Sharp (alternate)

Kings County Area Disaster Council
Francisco Ramirez
Diane Sharp (alternate)

Kings County Commission On Aging
Francisco Ramirez

Kings Mosquito Abatement District Board
Bill Gundacker

San Joaquin Valley Task Force Steering Com.

The appointment is to be made by Kings County

San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority
Kalish Morrow

Mid-Kings River Groundwater Sustainability Agency
Diane Sharp

Kings County Homeless Commission
John Draxler
RESULT: CONSENSUS
CONVENE AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY:

Mayor Ramirez convened the meeting for the Successors Agency at 8:11 p.m.

PUBLIC COMMENT-SUCCESSOR AGENCY :

Any person may directly address the Board at this time on any item on the agenda, or on any item that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board. A maximum of three minutes is allowed for each speaker.

None.

SUCCESSOR AGENCY FOR THE DISCUSSION OF THE FOLLOWING:

A. Finance: Review and approval of the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS 20 -21) for the period July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022.

Interim Finance Director E ric Frost discussed the history of the Successor Agency and the annual obligation to prepare a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) and submit the ROPS to the State Department of Finance (DOF).

Motion to approve the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the period July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022.

Page 419 of 698 ends

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: John Draxler, Council Member
SECONDER: Diane Sharp, Vice Mayor
AYES: Draxler, Sharp, Brieno, Morrow, Ramirez
ADJOURN AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY:

Mayor Ramirez adjourned the Successor Agency and reconvened the regular City Council Meeting at 8:15 p.m.

COUNCIL FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:

A. Council Future Agenda Items
It was a consensus of the Council to meet with staff at the proposed park site and discuss the placement of the Civic Park Playground Project.

ADJOURNMENT:

Mayor Ramirez adjourned the meeting at 8:15 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,

Natalie Corral
City Clerk

Page 420 of 698 ends

AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES

This Agreement for Services (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this 17th day of June, 2024, by and between the City of Hanford, a municipal corporation (“City”), and Clean Cut Landscape Management, Inc. (“Consultant”).

RECITALS

A. Consultant represents to City that they are specially trained, experienced, licensed, and competent to perform the services which will be required by this Agreement; and

B. Consultant represents to City that it possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein.

C. City desires to retain Consultant to render Veterinary Services as set forth in this Agreement.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein for such other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1) Retention of Consultant. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, City retains Consultant to perform the services identified in this Agreement, as an independent contractor and Consultant hereby accepts this independent contractor appointment.

2) Scope of Services and City Responsibilities.
a) Consultant shall perform the services (“Services”) and City shall have the responsibilities described on the attached Exhibit “A,” which is incorporated herein by reference. To the maximum extent possible, the terms of the body of this Agreement and Exhibit “A” shall be interpreted so they are consistent; however, if there is a direct and irreconcilable conflict between the text of this Agreement and Exhibit “A,” the former shall control.
b) Consultant shall correct any and all errors and/or omissions, which arise out of Consultant’s negligence or intentional misconduct, in the performance of the Services and any documents resulting therefrom even though City has accepted said Services or documents. Consultant shall make such corrections upon City’s request and at no cost or expense to City.

3) Time of Performance. Services shall be completed by the dates identified in the attached Exhibit “A.”

4) Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the attached Exhibit “A.” Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of errors, even if such errors were known to City at the time of payment.

Page 421 of 698 ends

RFP 2024-05
Landscape Services
2 5) Method of Payment. Consultant shall submit monthly billings to City describing the work performed during the preceding month. Consultants’ bills shall include a brief description of the Services performed and the date the Services were performed the number of hours spent and by whom, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures.

City shall pay Consultant no later than sixty (60) calendar days after the date of submittal of an invoice for completed tasks and approval of the invoice by City staff.

6) Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, “Extra Work” means any work which is determined by the City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Services, but which is not included in Exhibit “A.” Extra work will be performed on terms agreed upon by the parties. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for Extra Work without written authorization from the City.

7) Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by City immediately and without notice for cause or by City without cause upon ten (10) days’ written notice of termination to Consultant. Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for Services performed up to the effective date of termination, unless this Agreement is terminated for cause, in which case, City may withhold compensation due Consultant in order to reimburse City for any losses, damages or expenses caused by Consultant’s default under this Agreement.

8) Ownership of Documents . All plans, studies, documents and other writings and electronic disks containing drawings prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees, agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, except working notes and internal documents, shall become the property of City, and City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant’s expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request.

However, the City’s use of completed documents for other projects and/or the use of uncompleted documents without the written authorization of Consultant will be at the City’s sole risk. City shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify and hold harmless the Consultant from all claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including attorney fees, arising out of or resulting from any unauthorized reuse of, or changes to the Project Documents not performed by the Consultant.

9) Licensing of Intellectual Property . This Agreement creates a non -exclusive and perpetual license for City to use, modify, reuse or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data, electronic or otherwise, recorded on computer diskettes which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement (“Documents & Data”). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepared under this Agreement. Consultant

Page 422 of 698 ends

RFP 2024-05
Landscape Services
3 represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. The City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purpose intended by this Agreement shall be at the City’s sole risk. City shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify and hold harmless the Consultant from all claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including attorney fees, arising out of or resulting from any unauthorized reuse of or changes to the Project Documents not performed by the Consultant.

10) Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents & Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services under this Agreement, nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services under this Agreement. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City’s name, insignia, photographs, or the project for which Consultant’s Services are rendered, or any publicity pertaining to the Consultant’s Services under this Agreement in any magazine, t rade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent by City. Notwithstanding the foregoing, City acknowledges that the Consultant may want/need to include projects performed under this Agreement on proposals for similar work in the future. City hereby grants permission to list any projects performed under this agreement for marketing purposes; provided however, Consultant will not make any representations regarding City’s satisfaction with Consult ant’s work product unless Consultant receives a written statement or evaluation from City.

11) Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer, and it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non- discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to init ial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provi sions of City’s programs or guidelines currently in effect as identified and provided to Consultant by City.

12) Insurance Requirements.

a) Consultant, at Consultant’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of this Agreement, the following insurance policies.

i) Workers Compensation Coverage. As required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with a limit of no less than ONE MILLION AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease.

Page 423 of 698 ends

RFP 2024-05
Landscape Services
4 ii) Commercial General Liability (CGL) Coverage . Insurance Services Office (ISO) Form CG 0001, including products and completed operations, with a limit of no less than TWO MILLION AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage, and a general aggreg ate limit of no less than FOUR MILLION AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($4,000,000).

iii) Automobile Liability Coverage. ISO Form Number CA 0001 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Consultant has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and 9 (non - owned),with a limit no less than ONE MILLION AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

If the Consultant maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Consultant.

Consultant’s insurance policies shall be “occurrence” policies and not “claims made.”

Consultant may maintain an Umbrella policy in conjunction with the insurance policies referenced above. In such case, Consultant shall be deemed to have satisfied the insurance requirements of this contract as long as: (i) the coverage limits of the Umbrella policy and of the underlying liability policy(ies), when combined, satisfy each of the per occurrence and aggregate requirements identified in this section; and (ii) coverage under the Umbrella policy is as broad as and includes all incidents and events covered by the underlying insurance that it supplements.

b) Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City.

The city may require Consultant to purchase coverage with a lower deductible or retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. Alternatively, City may require Consultant to provide a financial guarantee satisfactory to City guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention.

c) The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

i) City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL and automobile liability policies with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Consultant including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations; products used by Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to Consultant’s insurance at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33 or CG 20 38 and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used . The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City and its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.

Page 424 of 698 ends

RFP 2024-05
Landscape Services
5 ii) For any claims related to this contract, Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as to City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insurance maintained by the City and/or its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be in excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall be non-contributory.

iii) Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City.

Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII

Consultant shall furnish City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by City before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant’s obligation to provide them. The city reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time.

d) Consultant hereby grants to City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of Consultant may acquire against City and/or its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Consultant agrees to obtain endorsements necessary to effect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

13) Indemnification. To the fullest extent allowable by law, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and its officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers from and against all claims, demands, actions, injuries, liabilities, losses, costs or damages, direct or indirect, and any and all attorneys’ fees and other expenses which City or its officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers may sustain or incur as a consequence of or are in any way related to Consultant’s or its owners, directors, officers, managers, employees, agents and subcontractor’s willful misconduct or negligent acts or omissions in the performance of the services and Consultants responsibilities and obligations to be performed under this agreement or its failure to perform or comply with any of its obligations or responsibilities contained in this agreement; excluding, however, such liability, claims, losses, damages or expenses arising from City’s sole or active negligence or willful misconduct. This duty to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless shall survive the termination of this agreement.

14) Independent Contractor Status. It is understood and agreed that the Consultant, in the performance of the Services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of City. Consultant shall obtain no retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to City’s employees and Consultant hereby expressly waives any claim it may have to any such rights. Nothing in this Agreement shall create or be construed as creating a partnership, joint venture or any other relationship between City and Consultant.

Page 425 of 698 ends

RFP 2024-05
Landscape Services
6 15) Consultant’s Books and Records.

a) Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement.

b) The consultant shall maintain all documents and records that demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of termination or completion of this Agreement.

c) Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City. Copies of such documents should be provided to the City for inspection at City offices.

d) Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant’s business, City may, by written request, require that custody of the records be given to City and that the records and documents be maintained in City offices. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by the Consultant , Consultant’s representatives, or Consultant’s successor-in-interest.

16) Interest of Consultant . Consultant and its owners, members, or shareholders, as applicable, covenant and represent that they do not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any othe r source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant’s Services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of the Services hereunder, to the best of its knowledge no person having any such interest shall perform any Services under this Agreement.

Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant:

a) will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to rendition of information, advice, recommendation, or counsel independent of the control and direction of City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and

b) possesses no authority with respect to any City decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation, or counsel. FPPC Reg. Sec. 18700, et seq.

17) Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon Consultant’s representations regarding its training and professional ability to perform the Services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled personnel to perform all Services under this Agreement. The primary provider of the Services called for by this Agreement shall be Karry Wendel, who shall

Page 426 of 698 ends

RFP 2024-05
Landscape Services
7 not be replaced without the written consent of City. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with the applicable professional stan dard care and shall meet the local professional standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent persons in Consultant’s field of expertise working in Kings County.

18) Compliance with Laws . The consultant shall use the proper standard of care in performing the Services and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations in effect at the time the agreement is executed. In addition, if the request for proposal to provide services which are the subject of this Agreement cited any federal or state financial assistance involved in the project for which the Services are provided, the Consultant shall perform all services in accordance with all applicable federal and state laws, rates and regulations in effect at the time the agreement is executed.

19) Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, and insurance which are legally required of Consultant to lawfully and competently perform the Services. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, and insurance which are legally required of Consultant to lawfully and competently perform the Services. Cons ultant shall maintain a City of Hanford business license.

20) Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the reputation, experience, and competence of Consultant. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express written consent of City, which will not be unreasonably withheld. Consultant shall not subcontract any po rtion of the Services to be performed under this Agreement without the express written consent of City, which will not be unreasonably withheld. If the City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of the subcontractor.

Nothing in this Agreement shall: (i) create any contractual relationship between City and subcontractor; (ii) create any obligation on the part of City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor; (iii) or relieve Consultan t of any of its obligations and responsibilities under this Agreement.

21) Attorneys’ Fees. If an action at law or in equity is necessary to enforce or interpret the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs, and necessary disbursements in addition to any other reasonable relief to which he may be entitled. With respect to any suit, action or proceeding arising out of or related to this Agreement, or the documentation related hereto, the parties hereby submit to the jurisdiction and venue of the Superior Court for the County of Kings, State of California for any proceeding arising hereunder.

22) Sole and Only Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties hereto with respect to the matters set forth herein and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties regarding said matters. Each pa rty to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or in writing, have been made by any party

Page 427 of 698 ends

RFP 2024-05
Landscape Services
8 or anyone acting on behalf of any party which are not embodied in this Agreement and no other agreement, statement or promise shall be valid or binding.

23) Invalidity. If any provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force and effect without being impaired or invalidated in any way.

24) Amendment. No change, amendment or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless the same be in writing and signed by the parties hereto.

25) Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed and governed pursuant to the laws of the State of California.

26) Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement.

27) Mediation. The parties agree to make a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes arising out of this Agreement through mediation prior to commencing litigation. The parties shall mutually agree upon the mediator and shall divide the costs of mediation equally. If the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator, the dispute shall be submitted to JAMS/ENDISPUTE (“JAMS”) or its successor in interest. JAMS shall provide the parties with the names of five qualified mediators. Each party shall have the option to strike two of the five mediators selected by JAMS and thereafter the mediator remaining shall hear the dispute. If the dispute remains unresolved after mediation, either party may commence litigation.

28) Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further Consultant warrants that it has not paid, nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or result from the award or making of this Agreement.

For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer, or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

29) Authority to Enter Agreement . Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver and perform the Agreement . Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party.

30) Notice. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, any notice, consent, authorization or other communication to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly given and received when delivered personally, when transmitted by facsimile or e- mail if receipt is acknowledged by the addressee, one business day after being deposited for next-day delivery with a nationally recognized overnight delivery service, or three business days after being mailed by first class mail, charges and postage prepaid, property

Page 428 of 698 ends

RFP 2024-05
Landscape Services
9 addressed to the party to receive such notice at the last address furnished for such purpose by the party to whom notice is directed and addressed as follows:

CITY OF HANFORD CONSULTANT
Mario A. Cifuentez II Clean Cut Landscape Management, Inc.

City of Hanford Karry Wendel, President
319 N. Douty 1865 Herndon Avenue, K636
Hanford, CA 93230 Clovis, CA 93619
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement effective on the day and in the year first set forth above.

CITY

CITY OF HANFORD,
a Municipal Corporation
By:__________________________________
MARIO A. CIFUENTEZ II
City Manager

CONSULTANT
CLEAN CUT LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT, INC.

By:___________________________________

KARRY WENDEL
President

Page 429 of 698 ends

31 EXHIBIT ASCOPE OF SERVICES 1. Irrigation Service and Repair include but are not limited to time clock maintenance and repairs; valve, head, and piping maintenance and repairs; drip system maintenance and repair; and booster pump maintenance. The area to be covered by the contractor is immediately after the water meter/ point of connection through the rest of the irrigation system. The exception is any backflow devices that will be serviced annually by the Water Dept. a. Irrigation Time Clock Maintenance is all related: to programming cycles, seasonal adjusting, wiring, or rewiring, troubleshooting problems, and necessary repairs. To maintain adequate soil moisture Contractor will program the irrigation system as follows: i. Adjusting and setting the automatic controller to establish the frequency and length of the watering period in compliance with the City of Hanford 1. Consideration must be given to the soil conditions, humidity, minimizing run-off, and the relationship of conditions that affect irrigation. ii. In the areas where wind creates problems of spraying water onto private property or road rights-of-way, the controllers shall be set to operate during the period of lowest wind velocity which would normally occur at night or early morning hours. iii. The irrigation system will be controlled in such a way as not to cause any excessively wet or "water-logged" areas which could interfere with the ability to mow all turf. "In lawn" trees and other plantings shall be protected from over-watering and run off. iv. All landscaped areas shall be watered as needed to maintain a healthy condition, with appropriate care being taken not to overwater in shady areas or violate City irrigation standards without prior written approval for the variance. v. Newly seeded turf (through the sixth mowing) shall be watered immediately after mowing. Well-established turf shall not be watered for at least four (4) hours after mowing. b. Valve, Head, and Piping Maintenance and Repairs. Operation and maintenance of the irrigation system shall receive no less than the following: i. Irrigation valves shall be serviced regularly so the system can consistently provide adequate water to the plant materials in its service area. 1. Valves shall be throttled wide open unless a specific need is identified. 2. Solenoids will be checked periodically to ensure connections are secure and solenoids are functioning properly. 3. Check the operability of controllers, quick couplers, valves, and sprinkler heads once per month or more frequently if problems/conditions indicate a need and report system status to the Parks Supervisor/Parks and Facilities Manager.

Page 430 of 698 ends

32 4. Repair and/or replace damaged or inoperable valves as needed. ii. Irrigation heads shall be serviced regularly so the system can consistently provide adequate water to the plant materials in its service area. 1. Station checks to evaluate the regular operations should be done min of once per month to allow the Contractor to observe the actual operation of the irrigation heads to ensure proper rotation and coverage. 2. Nozzles should be balanced to provide consistent coverage between heads on the same station. Same GPM in coverage areas. 3. Water shall be regulated to avoid interference with any use of the facility's roadways, paving, or walks. 4. Heads should be adjusted as needed to ensure correct areas are being covered and no unintended areas are receiving excess water. c. Piping and line maintenance i. During station checks the Contractor should also observe the area that the irrigation piping runs under to look for breaks, leaks, or other irregularities that could indicate problems or repairs that need to be made. 1. If a lateral line needs repair the valve that controls that line can be throttled down to let the rest of the system operate as normal and not impact the rest of the system. 2. If the leak is on a mainline, then the backflow or isolation valve should be closed so the repair can be made at the earliest possible opportunity. d. Drip lines and low-flow systems i. Regular flushing and maintenance should be done to ensure adequate flow to the plant materials being served by the system. ii. Since these systems are prone to damage (vandalism and rodents) the Contractor should make a point to observe the entire line when doing a station test at least once every other month or more if a persistent problem is present. e. Booster pumps should be serviced at least twice per year with regular observations when doing monthly stations test. i. Each pump and motor are unique and may have specialized needs. Become familiar with the pump and motor at your facilities. ii. Common service needs can include greasing points, tightening housing around bushings, checking for wear, etc. 2. Landscape/Turf Maintenance a. Mowing - Mowing operations shall be scheduled Monday through Friday between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. i. All grass clippings can be mulched on-site and clippings must be dispersed to not create a "windrow" situation on the same day the area is mowed. Except for designated parks or removed from the site as soon after the mowing as possible.

Page 431 of 698 ends

33 b.Edging -All turf edges including but not limited to sidewalks, patios, drives, curbs, shrub beds, flower beds, groundcover beds, and around the base of trees shall be edged to a neat and uniform line. i. Mechanical edging of turf shall be performed at each site at a minimum of every other week. The edging shall be completed as one operation in a manner that ensures a well-defined edge. 1. Use tools like edgers, string trimmers, or use of herbicides can be used to accomplish this task. ii. Irrigation-related areas - Detailing of sprinkler heads (to provide maximum water coverage), valve boxes, meter boxes, and similar small obstacles in turf areas shall be performed in a manner that ensures operability, ease of location, or a clean appearance. 1. Chemicals may be used to attain clearance in addition to other mechanical methods. Grass should be no more than six (6) inches from any edge of the irrigation-related features. Irrigation heads need to be free of obstructions and may have grass immediately adjacent to them trimmed back as needed. iii. Plant materials 1. Trees & Shrubs - Where trees and shrubs occur in turf areas, all grass growth shall be limited to a minimum of twelve (12) inches from the trunk of trees and Six (6) inches away from the drip line of shrubs. 2. The maximum distance from the base should not be more than five (5) times the width of the trunk away from larger trees, and no larger than the maximum of a five (5) foot radius. 3. The exception to the five (5) foot radius is if the roots of a tree have lifted out of the ground they should be avoided to preserve the equipment and removed as part of the tree care and maintenance. iv. Planter beds - should have a clean edge and whenever possible a cement mow strip to maintain the definition between the turf and planter beds. When other methods are used to separate these spaces, the grass shall be cut back to make a clean defined line separating the two spaces. v. All turf areas shall be kept neatly edged and all grass invasions into areas not designated as turf are to be eliminated. c. Blowing All hardscapes should be free from debris and clippings. i. Walkways Walkways shall be cleaned immediately following each mowing/ edging and a minimum of once per week. This includes DG and other non-cement pathways and surfaces. ii. Shelters and Slabs all shelters and picnic table slabs should be blown down at least once per week but more as needed. iii. Parking lots should be blown out every week and heavier debris should be picked up as needed. iv. Play areas- pour in place (PIP) and other hardscapes should be blown down a minimum of once per week or more if needed. This should also include the mow strip along the edges of the play spaces and transition ramps.

Page 432 of 698 ends

34 3.Tree, Shrub, Groundcover, and Vine Maintenanceincludes but is not limited to pruning, fertilizing, and weeding. a. Trees care should be performed in such a way that the tree is groomed to become as close to the ideal depiction (shape and growth profile) of the species as possible and ensure the longest lifespan as possible. i. given time to prevent stressing the tree or inviting pests. Shearing of trees shall not be permitted. ii. Trees shall be pruned to select and develop permanent scaffold branches that are smaller in diameter than the trunk or branch to which they are attached; and which have well-spaced branches eighteen (18) inches apart, orientated so as not to overlay one another. iii. Under no circumstances shall stripping of lower branches ("raising ") of young trees be permitted. Lower branches shall be retained in a 'tipped back' or pinched condition with as much foliage as possible to promote caliper trunk growth (tapered trunk). Lower branches may be pruned to the trunk when side branches reach one-third (1/3) the diameter of the trunk. iv. Evergreen trees shall be thinned out and shaped when necessary to prevent wind and storm damage. b. Pruning of trees shall be done as needed to achieve the following: i. To shape, particularly to correct misshaping caused by the wind. ii. To maintain the natural form and balance of the trees. iii. To remove all dead or damaged branches. iv. To remove suckers, water sprouts, and other undesirable growth on trees. v. To shorten or remove lower branches wherever they pose a problem to pedestrians or vehicles-ten (10) feet for pedestrian areas and walkways; fourteen (14) feet for vehicular roadways. c. Pruning Procedures i. When it is necessary to reduce limb lengths, drop crotch as much as possible and avoid cutting back the support limbs to laterals less than one third (1/3) o f the diameter of the supporting limbs. ii. A three (3) saw cut will be used on large, heavy branches. All limbs greater than one and one-half (1 1/2) inches shall be undercut to prevent splitting or peeling the bark. iii. No trees are to be topped without the consent of the Supervisor and then only in cases to alleviate a hazardous condition. When the topping is necessary, attention shall be given to reshaping the trees to maintain a typical tree form for the species. iv. God are to be cleared by the vendor as part of the regular duties. If the branch falls after hours and is blocking the right of way City staff may clear the debris from the right of way and leave the material for the vendor to remove.

Page 433 of 698 ends

35 d. Planter Beds - Shrubs, Groundcover, and Vines should be maintained in such a way as to allow for the aesthetics and plant natural qualities to be displayed. i. Restrict the growth of hedges and shrubs to areas behind curbs and walkways and within planter beds by trimming. Under no circumstances shall hedge shears be used as a means of pruning. ii. Planter beds should be kept weed free as much as possible. See weed control iii. Shrubs 1. Shrubs with flowers on old growth should be pruned immediately after they have flowered. Shrubs with flowers on new growth should be pruned in late winter or early spring. 2. Shrubs should be kept no taller than 5 ft unless otherwise specified in the site description. 3. Deadwood or dead leaves should be removed during regular service cycles. iv. VINES 1. Vines and espalier plants shall be checked and secured as required. Secure vines with appropriate ties to promote directional growth on supports. 2. Do not use nails to secure vines on masonry walls. 3. Deepwater vines in pockets are not provided with sprinklers as required to promote optimum growth. v. Groundcover 1. All areas planted in ground covers shall be adequately irrigated and fertilized to maintain vigorous growth. 2. Ground cover beds shall be periodically edged to keep them in their intended space. Ground covers shall not be allowed to encroach into sidewalks, lawns, shrub beds, or other areas deemed undesirable by the Parks Manager. 3. Ground cover plantings shall be periodically thinned and pruned for vigorous growth and overall appearance of the site as directed by the Parks Manager. 4. Periodic replanting will be required to maintain ground cover continuity. A request for replacement planting material is to be submitted to the Parks Manager along with an estimate to supply the labor for such replacement. 5. Weed invasion into ground cover areas may require complete removal, chemical treatment of the area, and replacement of ground cover at the Contractor's expense. vi. Pruning/Trimming Frequency 1. Trees: Clearance pruning two (2) times per year as n e c e s s a r y . 2. Vines: Pruning of vines will be following good horticulture practices as needed. 3. Groundcover thinning: As needed.

Page 434 of 698 ends

36 4.Pruning plant material for vehicular and pedestrian visibility clearance and access: Four (4) times per year or more often as needed depending upon the growth patterns of the plant species in question. 5. Hedge and shrub pruning: As needed dependent upon the growth patterns of the plant species in question. vii. Any hazards or acts of vandalism shall be reported immediately to the Parks Supervisor. Hazards, such as broken tree limbs, broken benches, potholes on grounds, standing water, ropes tied to tree limbs, excavations, and unsecured material (such as wood, wire, metal, etc.), may be appropriately remedied by the Contractor. viii. Plant material shall conform to the requirements of the Landscape Plan of the area and to the "Horticultural Standards" of the American Association of Nurserymen. e. Trash/Litter Abatement i. Trash cans in LAD parks should be emptied during weekly service cycles. ii. Litter/hand trash should be picked up prior to any mowing or other power tool use that could spread or shred the trash creating a greater eyesore. 4. Wedd Control - General. For the purposes of this specification, a weed shall be considered to be any undesirable plant or plant growing out of place. a. All landscaping within the specified maintenance areas including lawns, planter areas, and tree wells shall be kept weed free at all times. Complete removal of all weed growth is to be accomplished on a continuing basis. Weeds may be controlled by mechanical methods or chemical methods at the discretion of the Contractor. Weeds reaching a height of 2 inches shall be physically removed from landscaped areas. b. Center island maintenance shall include the removal of weeds growing on all paved and unpaved surfaces of the median vegetation growing at the base of the median between the curb face and street surface. c. Use of Chemical Herbicides for Weed Control. The Contractor shall abide by all rules and regulations of the California State Department of Pesticide Regulations, Department of Health, and Department of Industrial Relations regarding the safe application of herbicides under this contract. Care shall be taken to ensure the safety of the public and the Contractor's employees during chemical weed control operations. The Parks Superintendent may restrict the use of chemical weed control in certain areas. i. Great care shall be taken by the Contractor to avoid herbicide drift onto non-target plants. The Contractor will be required to obtain the appropriate permits from Kings County, provide herbicide chemicals and apply chemicals at cost. d. Disease and Pest Control i. The Contractor shall regularly inspect all landscaped areas for the presence of disease, insect, or rodent infestation. The Contractor shall notify the Parks Supervisor / Manager within 3 days of finding such a

Page 435 of 698 ends

37 condition, outlining identification and control measures to be taken. Upon approval of the Parks Supervisor / Manager, the Contractor shall implement the approved control measures utilizing all safeguards necessary to protect the public and Contractor's employees. e. Use of Chemical Pesticides. All rules of the California State Department of Pesticide Regulations, Department of Health and Department of Industrial Relations regarding safe application of pesticides under this contract shall be observed. f. Great care shall be taken to avoid pesticide drift onto non-target organisms.

Page 436 of 698 ends

NAMEPinecastleLocationDistrict 90-01AREA67,750Fund0240NAMEPortifino LocationDistrict 92-01AREA19,167Fund0245NAMEGateway EstatesLocationDistrict 94-01AREA2,725Fund0249NAMEGateway Estates BasinLocationDistrict 94-01AREA5,460Fund0249NAMESummerfieldLocationDistrict 97-02AREA4,650Fund0253NAMECrystal SpringsLocationDistrict 98-01AREA14,435Fund0255NAMESierra HeightsLocationDistrict 04-04AREA13,470Fund0266NAMESierra Heights BasinLocationDistrict 04-04AREA2,577Fund0266NAMEMisson Park FrontageLocationDistrict 05-01AREA2,393Fund0267 Quadrant 1
Ground covers, shrubs, trees; irrigation system; Flint Ave &Mission Dr Shrubs, accent plants, trees, straight sidewalks, irrigation system.

Along Fairmont Dr -North of Sheerwood CtPonding Basin (Interior of Subdivision) Ground cover, shrubs, trees; irrigation system; frontage sidewalk. All hedges are to be maintained to a height no greater than 5 feet. E Florinda @ 9 1/4 AveGround covers, shrubs, trees; irrigation system; frontage sidewalk. E Grangeville BlvdTurf, accent plants, trees, shrubs, irrigation system, meandering sidewalk 10th Ave & FargoE Fargo AveTurf, accent plants, shrubs, trees; irrigation system; meandering sidewalk, entry islands. All hedges and shrubs are to be maintained to a height no greater than 5 feet. 10th Ave @ Highway 43 (Mission Dr)Subdivision Frontage: Turf, ground cover, accent plants, shrubs, trees, vines; irrigation system; accent lights; entry island; meandering sidewalk. Turf, accent plants, ground covers, hedges, trees; irrigation system; landscape lights, meandering sidewalk; entry islands. Hedges are to be maintained 1-1/2 feet above the top of the wall.

Fargo Ave @ Meadow View Rd & HWY 43 Frontage Turf, accent plants, shrubs, trees, entry sign lighting, meandering sidewalk, irrigation system. Meadow View Rd Basin

Page 437 of 698 ends

NAMEMisson Park BasinLocationDistrict 05-01AREA3,125Fund0267NAMEThe Greens IILocationDistrict 15-02AREA16,416Fund0275NAMEQuail Run Estates FrontageLocationDistrict 94-03AREA20,583Fund0251NAMEQuail Run Estates ParkLocationDistrict 94-03AREA29,494Fund0251NAMEQuail Run Estates Basin ParkLocationDistrict 94-03AREA56,469Fund0251NAMEPoppy HillsLocationDistrict 01-03AREA11,782Fund0259NAMEQuail Park FrontageLocationDistrict 06-01AREA52,950Fund0269NAMEQuail Park Railroad FrontageLocationDistrict 06-01AREA34,140Fund0269NAMEStonecrest FrontageLocationDistrict 94-02AREA67,875Fund0250Glacier Way & Flint AveTurf, accent plants, shrubs, trees, irrigation system, meandering, and straight sidewalks. Railroad Frontage N of GalcierTrees, shrubs, automatic bubbler-type irrigation11 Ave & FargoTurf, accent plants, ground cover, vines, shrubs, trees; irrigation system; entry islands; meandering sidewalk.

Windsor Dr & Fir DrTrees, turf, shrubs, straight walk, curbing, irrigation systems, and Trash/ litter abatement. Windsor Dr & Fir DrTrees, turf, shrubs, irrigation systems, and Trash/ litter abatement. N 11th AveTurf, accent plants, ground cover, trees, shrubs, irrigation system, meandering sidewalk; entry islands.

Mission Dr , North of Adobe StShrubs, trees, ground cover, irrigation system and walkwayGrangeville @ 9 1/4 AveShrubs, accent plants, trees, straight sidewalks, irrigation system. 11th Ave Pepper to MillbrookTurf, accent plants, ground cover, shrubs, trees; irrigation system; entry islands; straight sidewalk within the parkway.

Page 438 of 698 ends

NAMEStonecrest / Glacier ParkLocationDistrict 94-02AREA54,450Fund0250NAMEStonecrest Railroad FrontageLocationDistrict 94-02AREA51,578Fund0250Fargo & GlacierIrrigation system, turf grass, trees, meandering sidewalk, and rolling terrain. Trash/ litter abatement. Railroad frontage north of FargoAutomatic bubbler-type irrigation, shrubs and tr+A3:F101ees, weed control, plant basin care.

Page 439 of 698 ends

NAMEPark MontereyLocationDistrict 90-02AREA8,625Fund0241NAMEMansionetteLocationDistrict 90-03AREA16,425Fund0242NAMECambridge Homes Frontage LocationDistrict 01-02AREA12,435Fund0258NAMECambridge Homes Railroad Frontage LocationDistrict 01-02AREA22,790Fund0258NAMEMajesty /Cambridge Homes Frontage LocationDistrict 04-02AREA55,384Fund0264NAMEMajesty /Cambridge Homes Basin ForntageLocationDistrict 04-02AREA8,440Fund0264NAMEVintage Estates LocationDistrict 93-01AREA16,980Fund0247NAMEVineyards- Cambridge Homes Frontage LocationDistrict 04-03AREA70,290Fund0265 Quadrant 2
Fitzgerald Ln and Fargo Ave to include inlets at Muscat, Semillion, Burgandy and SyrahTurf, accent plants, shrubs, trees; automatic spray-type irrigation system; meandering sidewalk.

Douty to Flint &11th AveTurf, accent plants, shrubs, trees, irrigation system, meandering, and straight sidewalks. Pioneer WY, Harold Griswold WY, Johnua StTrees, shrubs, accent plants, irrigation system. N 12th AveTurf, accent plants, ground covers, vines, shrubs, trees; irrigation system; no sidewalk; maintain d.g. surface frontage in a weed-free condition.

N Douty AveTurf, accent plants, ground covers, shrubs, hedges, roses, trees; irrigation system; meandering sidewalk. All hedges are to be maintained to a height no greater than 5 feet. N 11th AveTurf, accent plants, ground cover, trees, shrubs, Irrigation system, meandering sidewalk. Railroad Frontage Shrubs, trees, weed control, plant basin, irrigation system.N Douty AveTurf, accent plants, ground covers, shrubs, hedges, trees; irrigation system; meandering sidewalk. All hedges are to be maintained to a height no greater than 5 feet.

Page 440 of 698 ends

NAMEVineyards- Cambridge Homes- ParkLocationDistrict 04-03AREA77,548Fund0265NAMEVineyards- Cambridge Railroad Frontage LocationDistrict 04-03AREA19,929Fund0265NAMECopper ValleyLocationDistrict 05-02AREA44,126Fund0268NAMEVictory EstatesLocationDistrict 09-01AREA7,077Fund0270NAMECielo En TierraLocationDistrict 92-02AREA11,735Fund0246NAMEPacific Grove FrontageLocationDistrict 01-01AREA8,622Fund0257NAMEPacific Grove Basin FrontageLocationDistrict 01-01AREA3,530Fund0257NAMELeParc FrontageLocationDistrict 03-01AREA8,770Fund0262NAMELeParc Railroad FrontageLocationDistrict 03-01AREA21,858Fund0262Railroad frontage S of FargoTrees, shrubs, irrigation system. W. Grangeville Blvd and Fitzgerald LnTurf, ground cover, shrubs, trees, automatic spray-type irrigation, meandering sidewalk. W. Grangeville Blvd and Fitzgerald LnGround cover, shrubs, trees, automatic spray-type irrigation, frontage sidewalk. All hedges to be maintained to a height no greater than 5 feet. Fargo Ave and Glacier WayTurf, accent plants, shrubs, trees, irrigation, meandering sidewalk. Small entryway median with trees and accent plants.

Fargo Ave/12th Ave/Saneiovese StTurf, trees, shrubs, accent plants, ivy on the wall; two entryway medians with trees, accent plants; meandering and straight sidewalks; irrigation system. University St and Berkshire StTrees, shrubs, accent plants, ivy on the wall; straight sidewalks, irrigation systemW Fargo AveTurf, accent plants, vines, palms, hedges, ground covers; irrigation system; meandering sidewalk.

W Semillon St & Syrah PLTurf, shrubs, accent plants, meandering sidewalk, irrigation systemApprox 420 ft south of Fargo Ave to Courtner StTrees, shrubs, weed control, irrigation system.

Page 441 of 698 ends

NAMEPacific Grove 2LocationDistrict 19-01AREA12,152Fund027912 th Ave & Bristol, Bristol & Pleasnt WyTurf, trees, shrubs, accent plants, meandering and straight sidewalks, irrigation system

Page 442 of 698 ends

NAMESilver Oaks FrontageLocationDistrict 01-04AREA95,556Fund0260NAMESilver Oaks AdditionLocationDistrict 15-01AREA29,985Fund0274NAMESilver Oaks ParkLocationDistrict 15-01AREA112,971Fund0274NAMEWoodsideLocationDistrict 16-01AREA16,628Fund0276NAMEBella Vista ParkLocationDistrict 18-01AREA96,460Fund0278NAMEBella Vista FrontageLocationDistrict 18-01AREA62,285Fund0278NAMEBonnaterra FrontageLocationDistrict 18-01AREA70,200Fund0278NAMEBonnaterra BasinLocationDistrict 18-01AREA8,281Fund0278NAMEBonnaterra Park LocationDistrict 18-01AREA113,950Fund0278 Quadrant 3
Fargo Ave, Centennial Dr, Devon StTurf, trees, shrubs, accent plants, meandering and straight sidewalks, irrigation systemVan Gogh & Jules: Dali Wy & Elizabeth DrTurf, trees, shrubs, accent plants, meandering and straight sidewalks, irrigation systemSanjovese St & Napa DrTurf, trees, shrubs, accent plants, meandering and straight sidewalks, irrigation system, and trash/ litter abatement.

Centennial & GrangevilleTurf, trees, shrubs, accent plants, meandering and straight sidewalks, irrigation systemElizabeth Dr & Vineyard CtTurf, trees, shrubs, accent plants, meandering and straight sidewalks, irrigation systemNapa Dr, Sanjovesse St, Centennial DrTurf, trees, shrubs, accent plants, meandering and straight sidewalks, irrigation system W. Grangeville Blvd. Vintage Ave. and Centennial Dr Centennial Dr and Berkshire Ln.Turf, accent plants, ground cover, trees, shrubs, irrigation system, meandering sidewalk; entry island. Birshire W of Centennial Turf, trees, shrubs, accent plants, meandering and straight sidewalks, irrigation systemTurf, accent plants, ground cover, trees, shrubs, irrigation system, meandering sidewalk; entry islands. The interior streetscape is part of the total square footage and similar to the frontage; the area includes a portion of Centennial Dr.

Page 443 of 698 ends

NAMEWoodside IILocationDistrict 20-01AREA54,550Fund0281NAMEWoodside II ParkLocationDistrict 20-01AREA88,862Fund0281Turf, trees, shrubs, accent plants, meandering and straight sidewalks, irrigation systemTurf, trees, shrubs, accent plants, meandering and straight sidewalks, irrigation system, and trash/ litter abatement.

Page 444 of 698 ends

NAMEHyde parkLocationDistrict 90-04AREA1,425Fund0243NAMESierra Vista/New DimensionsLocationDistrict 91-01AREA12,974Fund0244NAMEWalnut Forest Frontage LocationDistrict 93-02AREA12,100Fund0248NAMEWalnut Forest Slough Frontage LocationDistrict 93-02AREA4,920Fund0248NAMERosewood EstatesLocationDistrict 97-01AREA6,300Fund0252NAMECountry CrossingLocationDistrict 97-03AREA46,415Fund0254NAMEMountain View Estates LocationDistrict 98-02AREA30,991Fund0256NAMEAshton ParkLocationDistrict 02-01AREA63,922Fund0261NAMESidoniaLocationDistrict 04-01AREA21,533Fund0263NAMEIndependence FrontageLocation Quadrant 4
W. Grangeville BlvdGround covers, shrubs, trees; automatic spray-type irrigation; frontage sidewalk.W. Lacey Blvd and Centennial DrTurf, ground cover, trees, shrubs, irrigation system, meandering sidewalk, median.S. 11th Ave at Houston AveGround cover, shrubs, trees, irrigation system, frontage, meandering sidewalk.

W. Hanford-Armona Rd & S 11th AveAccent plants, shrubs, hedges, trees; irrigation system; frontage sidewalk. All hedges are to be maintained to a height no greater than 5 feet.W Hume AveNative plants and ground covers, trees; irrigation system; frontage sidewalk.Payne Dr Shrubs, hedges, trees, curb and gutter walk, irrigation system(N. 12th Ave between Lacey and Grangeville Blvd)Hume Ave Accent plants, ground cover, trees, shrubs, ivy on the wall, meandering sidewalk, irrigation system12th Ave & Greenfield St Turf, accent plants, ground cover, trees, shrubs, irrigation system; entry island. The interior streetscape is part of the total footage and similar to the frontage; the area includes a portion of Centennial Drive Hanford Armona Rd E of 12th AveAccent plants and Shrubs, trees, sidewalk and irrigation system

Page 445 of 698 ends

District 09-02
AREA 33,197
Fund 0271
NAME Independence Park Location
District 09-02
AREA 23,055
Fund 0271
NAME Independence II Location
District 14-01
AREA 46,729
Fund 0273
NAME Independence II Location
District 14-01
AREA 76,555
Fund 0273
NAME Greenbrier Location
District 07-02A
AREA 5,808
Fund 0272
NAME Mynderup Location
District 16-02
AREA 43,245
Fund 0277
NAME Mynderup Basin Location
District 16-02
AREA 17,750
Fund 0277
Hanford Armona Rd & Greenbrier: 12 Ave
Accent plants, trees, shrubs, meandering, sidewalk, irrigation system.

Hume Ave & 12th Ave
accent plants, trees, shrubs, meandering, sidewalk, irrigation system.

Sidona St & Acres Wy
accent plants, trees, shrubs, meandering, sidewalk, irrigation system.

Hayward Ave & Cerritos Ave
Turf, shrubs, accent plants, meandering sidewalk, automatic irrigation, rotor and pop-up type heads.
12th Ave & Centennial Dr
Turf, accent plants, trees, shrubs, meandering, sidewalk, irrigation system.
12th Ave & Centennial Dr
Turf, accent plants, trees, shrubs, meandering, sidewalk, irrigation system.

Turf, accent plants, trees, shrubs, meandering, sidewalk, irrigation system.

Page 446 of 698 ends

DISTRICT LOCATION S/F PRICE
90-01 Pinecastle 67,750 $1,138.20
92-01 Portofino 19,167 $322.01
94-01 Gateway Estates 2,725 $45.78
94-01 Gateways Estates Basin 5,460 $91.73
97-02 Summerfield 4,650 $78.12
98-01 Crystal Springs 14,435 $242.51
04-04 Sierra Heights 13,470 $226.30
04-04 Sierra Heights Basini 2,577 $43.29
05-01 Mission Park Frontage 2,393 $40.20
05-01 Mission Park Basin 3,125 $52.50
15-02 The Greens II 16,416 $275.79
94-03 Quail Run Estates Frontage 20,583 $345.79
94-03 Quail Run Estates Park 29,494 $495.50
94-03 Quail Run Estates Basin 56,469 $948.68
01-03 Poppy Hills 11,782 $197.94
06-01 Quail Park Frontage 52,950 $889.56
06-01 Quail Park Railroad Frontage 34,140 $573.55
94-02 Stonecrest Frontage 67,875 $1,140.30
94-02 Stonecrest/Glacier Park 54,450 $914.76
94-02 Stonecrest Railroad Frontage 51,578 $866.51
TOTAL SQUARE FEET 531,489
$8,929.02
QUADRANT 1
TOTAL QUADRANT 4

Page 447 of 698 ends

DISTRICT LOCATION S/F PRICE
90-02 Park Monterey 8,625 $144.90
90-03 Mansionette 16,425 $275.94
01-02 Cambridge Homes Frontage 12,435 $208.91
01-02 Cambridge Homes Railroad Frontage 22,790 $382.87
04-02 Majesty/Cambridge Homes Frontage 55,384 $930.45
04-02 Majesty/Cambridge Homes Basin Frontage 8,440 $141.79 93-01 Vintage Estates 16,980 $285.26
04-03 Vineyards-Cambridge Homes Frontage 70,290 $1,180.87 04-03 Vineyards-Cambridge Homes Park 77,548 $1,302.81
04-03 Vineyeards-Cambridge Railroad Frontage 19,929 $334.81 05-02 Copper Valley 44,126 $741.32
09-01 Victory Estates 7,077 $118.89
92-02 Cielo En Tierra 11,735 $197.15
01-01 Pacific Grove Frontage 8,622 $144.85
01-01 Pacific Grove Basin Frontage 3,530 $59.30
03-01 LeParc Frontage 8,770 $147.34
03-01 LeParc Railroad Frontage 21,858 $367.21
19-01 Pacific Grove 2 12,152 $204.15
426,716
$7,168.83
QUADRANT 2

TOTAL SQUARE FEET
TOTAL PRICE QUADRANT 2

Page 448 of 698 ends

DISTRICT LOCATION S/F PRICE
01-04 Silver Oaks Frontage 95,556 1,605.34
15-01 Silver Oaks Addition 29,985 503.75
15-01 Silver Oaks Park 112,971 1,897.91
16-01 Woodside 16,628 279.35
18-01 Bella Vista Park 96,460 1,620.53
18-01 Bella Vista Frontage 62,285 1,046.39
18-01 Bonnaterra Frontage 70,200 1,179.36
18-01 Bonnaterra Basin 8,281 139.12
18-01 Bonnaterra Park 113,950 1,914.36
20-01 Woodside II 54,550 916.44
20-01 Woodside II Park 88,862 1,492.88

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
749,728
$12,595.43
QUADRANT 3

TOTAL SQUARE FEET
TOTAL PRICE QUADRANT 2

Page 449 of 698 ends

DISTRICT LOCATION S/F PRICE
90-04 Hyde Park 1,425 $22.73
91-01 Sierra Vista/New dimensions 12,974 $206.94
93-02 Walnut Forest Frontage 12,100 $193.00
93-02 Walnut Forest Slough Frontage 4,920 $78.47
97-01 Rosewood Estates 6,300 $100.49
97-03 Country Crossing 46,415 $740.32
98-02 Mountain View Estates 30,991 $494.31
02-01 Ashton Park 63,922 $1,019.56
04-01 Sidonia 21,533 $343.45
09-02 Independence Frontage 33,197 $529.49
09-02 Independence Park 23,055 $367.73
14-01 Independence II 46,729 $745.33
14-01 Independence II 76,555 $1,221.05
07-02A Greenbrier 5,808 $92.64
16-02 Mynderup 43,245 $689.76
16-02 Mynderup Basin 17,750 $283.11
446,919
$7,128.36

TOTAL SQUARE FEET
QUADRANT 4
TOTAL QUADRANT 4

Page 450 of 698 ends

QUADRANT LOCATION CURRENT LEVEL REVISED LEVEL-
2024
Q1 Pinecastle A A
67,750
Portifino D E
19,167
Gateway Estates D F-6
2,725
Gateway Estates Basin D F-6
5,460
Summerfield D F-6
4,650
Crystal Springs A E
14,435
Sierra Heights A A
13,470
Sierra Heights Basin A A
2,577
Misson Park Frontage A A
2,393
Misson Park Basin A A
3,125
The Greens II B B
16,416
Quail Run Estates Frontage B F-6
20,583
Quail Run Estates Park B C
29,494
Quail Run Estates Basin Park B XXX
56,469
Poppy Hills A A
11,782
Quail Park Frontage B B
52,950
Quail Park Railroad Frontage D D
34,140
Stonecrest Frontage A A
67,875
Stonecrest / Glacier Park A A
54,450
Stonecrest Railroad Frontage D D
51,578

Page 451 of 698 ends

Q2 Park Monterey D D
8,625
Mansionette D F-6
16,425
Cambridge Homes Frontage A A
12,435
Cambridge Homes Railroad Frontage D D
22,790
Majesty /Cambridge Homes Frontage A A
55,384
Majesty /Cambridge Homes Basin Forntage A A
8,440
Vintage Estates A A
16,980
Vineyards- Cambridge Homes Frontage B B
70,290
Vineyards- Cambridge Homes- Park B B
77,548
Vineyards- Cambridge Railroad Frontage D D
19,929
Copper Valley A A
44,126
Victory Estates A A
7,077
Cielo En Tierra D D
11,735
Pacific Grove Frontage A A
8,622
Pacific Grove Basin Frontage A A
3,530
LeParc Frontage A A
8,770
LeParc Railroad Frontage D D
21,858
Pacific Grove 2 A A
12,152
Q3 Silver Oaks Frontage A A
95,556
Silver Oaks Addition A A
29,985
Silver Oaks Park A A
112,971
Woodside A A
16,628

Page 452 of 698 ends

Bella Vista Park A A
96,460
Bella Vista Frontage A A
62,285
Bonnaterra Frontage A A
70,200
Bonnaterra Basin A A
8,281
Bonnaterra Park A A
113,950
Woodside II Ella Garden A A
54,550
Woodside II Park Ella Garden A A
88,862
Q4 Hyde park B B
1,425
Sierra Vista/New Dimensions E E
12,974
Walnut Forest Frontage A C
12,100
Walnut Forest Slough Frontage A C
4,920
Rosewood Estates D D
6,300
Country Crossing A E
46,415
Mountain View Estates A A
30,991
Ashton Park A A
63,922
Sidonia A A
21,533
Independence Frontage B B
33,197
Independence Park B B
23,055
Independence II A A
46,729
Independence II A A
76,555
Greenbrier A A
5,808
Mynderup B B
43,245

Page 453 of 698 ends

Mynderup Basin B B
17,750
Live Oak Frontages New A
Live Oak Park New A

Page 454 of 698 ends

VISITS

PER YEAR

LOCATIONS AT

THIS LEVEL
52 37
42 9
26 3
22 8
12 4
? 1
6 5

XXX-UNKNOWN SERVICE DISCONTINUED
F-6-UNKNOWN SIX VISITS
LEGEND

A-WEEKLY
B-WEEKLY 9 MONTHS/1 VISIT 3 MONTHS

C-EVERY OTHER WEEK ALL YEAR
D-EVERY OTHER WEEK 9 MONTHS/1 VISITS 3 MONTHS

E-ONE TIME PER MONTH ALL YEAR

Page 455 of 698 ends

11.E.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 7/2/2024 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Suggested Routes to School for Hanford Elementary School District, Pioneer Union Elementary School District, and Saint Rose-Thomas McCarthy Catholic School for the 2024-2025 school year.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file the attached Suggested Routes to School plans for Hanford Elementary School District, Pioneer Union School District, and Saint Rose-Thomas McCarthy Catholic School for the upcoming 2024-2025 school year.

BACKGROUND:

City staff met with the various School/School District staff to discuss the plans and possible changes to the Suggested Routes to School plans for the following Districts and/or respective schools for the upcoming 2024-2025 school year.

1. Hanford School District: Hamilton, King, Lincoln, Monroe, Richmond, Roosevelt, Simas, Washington, Kennedy Jr. High, and Wilson Jr. High;

2. Pioneer Union School District: Pioneer, Frontier, and Pioneer Middle School;

3. Saint Rose-Thomas McCarthy Catholic School.

These plans are required by the State of California of the schools to provide to Hanford Public School Districts to educate students and parents of the suggested routes to schools, and to indicate to students the suggested ways to get from home to school and back home. The plans additionally show the locations of the designated school bus stops for the noted school year.

California’s Safe Route to Schools Grants are available to cities to apply for through the Active Transportation Program (ATP). These grants may be used for infrastructure construction projects which encourage and enable students from grades K-8 to safely walk and bike to school. The Suggested Routes to School Plans are a requirement for the ATP grant application. The city and schools both benefit from the preparation and approval of the Suggested Routes to School plans.

Summary of Suggested Routes to School Plan Changes:

1. Hanford School District:
a. For the upcoming 2024-2025 school year, the school boundaries have changed, and the maps have been updated to reflect each school boundary.

Page 456 of 698 ends

b. Students will continue to be transferred to Hamilton School and Monroe School.

2. Pioneer Union School District:
a. For the upcoming 2024-2025 school year, boundaries will remain the same.

3. Saint Rose-Thomas McCarthy Catholic School:
a. No Changes.

Attached are the maps and written descriptions for each school that describe the elements of each plan.

There is no fiscal impact from this project. Based on input from School District staff, City staff would prepare and provide the plans to the school districts, and the school districts copy and distribute the plans to the parents and students. Since the preparation of these plans is the responsibility of the school district, and due to limited city staff resources, these plans will longer be prepared by City Staff in the future.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Hanford Elementary School District Maps and Descriptions for the 24-25 school year.

2. Pioneer Union Elementary School District Maps and Descriptions for the 24-25 school year.

3. St Rose-Thomas McCarthy Catholic School Map and Description for the 24-25 school year.

Page 457 of 698 ends

Page 458 of 698 ends

Page 459 of 698 ends

Page 23 of 63 ends

HAMILTON SCHOOL
Suggested Route to School
The key elements of this plan are as follows:

1. That the students living south of Fargo Avenue, west of Fernwood Drive, north of Fairview Place, and east of Neill Way walk to the bus stop at Fargo Avenue and Neill Way.

2. That the students living south of Fargo Avenue, west of 9 ¼ Avenue, north of Grangeville Boulevard, and east of Fernwood Drive walk to the bus stop at Fargo Avenue and 9 ¼ Avenue.

3. That the students living south of Fairview Place, west of Fernwood Drive, north of Leland Way and east of Neill Way walk to the bus stop at Lakewood Drive east of Teakwood Way.

4. That the students living south of Leland Way, west of 9-1/4 Avenue, north of Terrace Drive, and east of Neill Way walk to Hamilton School.

5. That the students living south of Leland Way, west of 9-1/4 Avenue, north of Grangeville Boulevard, and east of Harrison Avenue walk to Hamilton School.

6. That the students living south of Grangeville Boulevard, west of 9-1/4 Avenue, and north of Florinda Street and east of Lassen Drive walk to the bus stop at Richmond School/Kennedy Jr. High School.

7. That the students living south of Grangeville Boulevard, west of Highway 43, north of Lacey Boulevard, and east of 9-1/4 Avenue walk to the bus stop at Lacey Boulevard, west of Carolyn Avenue.

8. That the students living south of Grangeville Boulevard, west of Highway 43, north of Lacey Boulevard, and east of Carolyn Avenue walk to the bus stop at Lacey Boulevard east of Sierra Avenue.

9. That the students living south of Terrace Drive, west of Harrison Avenue, north of Grangeville Boulevard, and east of Neil Way walk to the bus stop at
Grangeville Blvd and Harding Ave.

Page 460 of 698 ends

Page 461 of 698 ends

Page 462 of 698 ends

LINCOLN SCHOOL

Page 29 of 63 ends

Suggested Routes to School The
key elements of this plan are as follows:

1. That the students living south of Freeway 198, west of 10th Avenue, north of Hanford- Armona Road, and east of Santa Fe Railroad tracks walk to Lincoln School.

2. That the students living south of Freeway 198, west of 9-1/2 Avenue, north of Hanford- Armona Road, and east of 10th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Third Street and 9-1/2 Avenue.

3. That the students living south of Hanford-Armona Road, west of Santa Fe Railroad tracks, north of Houston Ave, and east of 11th Avenue walk to the bus stop at 11th Avenue and Thompson Drive.

4. That the students living south of extension of Hanford-Armona Road, west of 10-1/2 Avenue, north of Houston, and east of Santa Fe Railroad tracks walk to the bus stop at Hanford-Armona Road and 10-1/2 Avenue and the bus stop on 10-1/2 Avenue north of Houston Avenue.

5. That the students living south of Hanford-Armona Road, west of Foggy Bottom Road, north of Orchard Drive, and east of 10-1/2 Avenue walk to the bus stop at Hanford-Armona Road and Jordan Way and the bus stop on 10th Avenue south of Hanford-Armona Road at Bakery on 10th Avenue.

Page 463 of 698 ends

Page 464 of 698 ends

Page 465 of 698 ends

Page 26 of 63 ends

MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. SCHOOL
Suggested Routes to School
The key elements of this plan are as follows:

1. That the students living south of Hanford-Armona Road, west of the extension of Country Place/Kimball Avenue, north of Banneker Street/Edison Court, and east of and including Manor Avenue, walk to the bus stop at Hume Ave and Monterey Ave.

2. That the students living south of Banneker Street, west of Butternut Drive, north of Hume Avenue, and east of 12th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Hume Avenue and Monterey Avenue.

3. That the students living south of Hanford-Armona Road, west of 11th Avenue, north of Millerton Street, and east of the extension of Butternut Drive/Kimball Avenue/Country Place walk to King School.

4. That the students living south of Millerton Street, west of 11th Avenue, north of Houston Avenue, and east of the extension of Butternut Drive/Kimball Avenue/Country Place walk to King School.

Page 466 of 698 ends

Page 467 of 698 ends

Page 468 of 698 ends

MONROE SCHOOL
Suggested Route to School
The key elements of this plan are as follows:

Page 32 of 63 ends

1. That the students living south of Fargo Avenue, west of 11th Avenue, north of Mussel Slough, west of Mussel Slough, north of Yosemite Drive, and east of Santa Fe Railroad tracks walk to the bus stop at Fargo Avenue and Fountain Plaza Drive.

2. That the students living south of Mussel Slough, west of 11th Avenue, north of Cortner Street, east of Santa Fe Railroad tracks, south of Muir Way and east of Mussel Slough walk to the bus stop on Glacier Way and Cortner Street.

3. That the students living south of Fargo Ave, west of Douty Street, north of Grangeville Boulevard, and east of 11th Avenue walk to Monroe School.

4. That the students living south of Cortner Street, west of 11th Avenue, north of Grangeville Boulevard, and east of Santa Fe Railroad tracks walk to the bus stop at Rodgers Road and Conquistador Street.

5. That the students living south of Grangeville Boulevard, west of 11th Avenue, north of Van Zate Street/ Central Branch Peoples Ditch, and east of Santa Fe Railroad tracks walk to the bus stop at Rodgers Road and Water Street and the bus stop at Rodgers Road and south of Water Street.

6. That the students living south of Grangeville Boulevard, west of Douty Street, north of Florinda Street, and east of 11th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Jefferson School.

7. That the students living south of Florinda Street, west of Douty Street, north of Highway 198, and east of 11th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Woodrow Wilson School.

8. That the students living south of Van Zate Street/ Central Branch Peoples Ditch , west of 11th Avenue, north of Ivy Street, and east of Santa Fe Railroad tracks walk to the bus stop at Rodgers Road and Water Street and the bus stop at Rodgers Road and Cameron Street.

Page 469 of 698 ends

Page 470 of 698 ends

Page 471 of 698 ends

Page 472 of 698 ends

RICHMOND SCHOOL
Suggested Route to School
The key elements of this plan are as follows:

Page 35 of 63 ends

1. That the students living south of Grangeville Boulevard, west of 9¼ Avenue, north of San Joaquin Valley Railroad tracks, east of Lassen Drive, north of Kruger Avenue, and east of 10th Avenue walk to Richmond School.

2. That the students living south of Kruger Avenue, west of Lassen Drive, north of Lacey Boulevard, and east of 10th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Lacey Boulevard and Jessie Street for pick-up and Lacey Boulevard and Miller Street for drop-off.

3. That the students living south of Lacey Boulevard, west of 9¼ Avenue, north of Freeway 198, east of Peoples Ditch, north of San Joaquin Valley Railroad tracks, and east of 10th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Lacey Boulevard and Lacey Inn.

4. That the students living south of San Joaquin Valley Railroad tracks, west of Peoples Ditch, north of Freeway 198, and east of 10th Avenue walk to the bus stop at 10th Avenue and Fifth Street.

5. That the students living south of Florinda Street, west of 10th Avenue, north of Seventh Street, and east of Redington Street, south of Lacey Blvd and east of 12th Ave walk to the bus stop at Tenth Street and Brown Street.

6. That the students living south of Seventh Street, west of 10th Avenue, north of Freeway 198, and east of 11th Ave, north of San Juaquin Valley Railroad tracks and east of 12th Ave walk to the bus stop at 10th Avenue and Fifth Street.

Page 473 of 698 ends

Page 474 of 698 ends

Page 475 of 698 ends

ROOSEVELT SCHOOL
Suggested Route to School
The key elements of this plan are as follows:

Page 38 of 63 ends

1. That the students living south of Freeway 198, west of Bengston Avenue, north of Hanford-Armona Road and east of 12th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Hanford-Armona Road and Ogden Street.

2. That the students living south of Freeway 198, west of 11th Avenue north of Hanford- Armona Road, and east of Bengston Avenue walk to Roosevelt School.

3. That the students living south of Freeway 198, west of Santa Fe Railroad tracks, north of Hanford-Armona Road, and east of 11th Avenue walk to Roosevelt School.

4. That the students living south of Hanford-Armona Road, west of Peoples Ditch/Centennial Park, north of Osprey Street, and east of 12th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Hanford-Armona Road and Centennial Park.

5. That the students living south of Hanford-Armona Road, west of 11th Ave, north of Tempe Drive west of 11th Ave, and east of Peoples Ditch/ Centennial Park walk to the bus stop at Hanford-Armona Road and Centennial Park.

6. That the students living south of Santa Fe Railroad tracks, west of 11th Avenue, north of Freeway 198 and east of 12th Avenue walk to the bus stop at 12th Ave and Glendale Ave.

Page 476 of 698 ends

Page 477 of 698 ends

Page 478 of 698 ends

SIMAS SCHOOL
Suggested Route to School
The key elements of this plan are as follows:

Page 41 of 63 ends

1. That the students living south of Fargo Avenue, west of Santa Fe Railroad tracks, north of Bella Oaks Way, and east of 12th Avenue walk to the bus stop on Fitzgerald Lane and Castoro Way.

2. That the students living south of Bella Oaks Way, west of Santa Fe Railroad tracks, north of Grangeville Boulevard, and east of 12th Avenue walk to Simas School.

3. That the students living south of Malone Street, west of Centennial Drive, north of Lacey Boulevard, and east of 13th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Centennial Drive and Charlie Chambers Drive.

4. That the students living south of Lacey Boulevard, west of Centennial Drive, north of the San Joaquin Valley Railroad tracks and east of 13th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Lacey Boulevard and Hofman’s Nursery.

5. That the students living south of Merritt Street, west of 12th Avenue, north of Lacey Boulevard, and east of Centennial Drive walk to the bus stop at Liberty Street and Marymont Avenue.

6. That the students living south of Grangeville Boulevard, west of 12th Avenue, north of Greenfield Avenue, and east of Centennial Drive walk to the bus stop at Greenfield Avenue and Kaplin Place.

7. That the students living south of Grangeville Boulevard, west of Centennial Drive, north of Bryman Street, east of 13th Ave. walk to the bus stop at Malone Street and Centennial Boulevard.

8. That the students living south of Greenfield Avenue, west of 12 th Avenue, north of Merritt Street, and east of Centennial Drive walk to the bus stop at Greenfield Avenue and Cerritos Avenue.

9. That the students living south of Grangeville Boulevard, west of University Avenue, north of Glenn Avenue, and east of 12th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Grangeville Boulevard and Rosewood Lane.

10. That the students living east of 12th Avenue, south of Glenn Avenue, west of University Avenue, and north of Greenfield Avenue walk to the bus stop at Greenfield Avenue east of Pleasant Way.

11. That the students living south of Grangeville Boulevard, west of Santa Fe Railroad tracks, north of Dominic Way, west of Campus Drive, north of Greenfield Avenue, and east of University Avenue walk to the bus stop at Grangeville Boulevard and Mildred Street.

Page 479 of 698 ends

Page 42 of 63 ends

Simas School, Suggested Route to School, continued

12. That the students living south of Dominic Way, west of Santa Fe Railroad tracks and 11th Avenue, north of Lacey Boulevard, and east of Campus Drive walk to the bus stop at Elm Street and Greenfield Avenue.

Page 480 of 698 ends

Page 481 of 698 ends

Page 482 of 698 ends

WASHINGTON SCHOOL
Suggested Route to School
The key elements of this plan are as follows:

Page 45 of 63 ends

1. That the students living south of Fargo Avenue, west of 10th Avenue, north of Grangeville Boulevard, and east of Douty Street walk to Washington School.

2. That students living south of Fargo Avenue, west of Neill Way, north of Willowood Court, and east of 10th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Fargo Avenue and Cedarwood Street.

3. That the students living south of Willowood Court, west of Neill Way, north of Leland Way, and east of 10th Avenue walk to the bus stop on Lakewood Drive west of Knowlwood Drive.

4. That the students living south of Leland Way, west of Neill Way, north of Grangeville Boulevard, and east of 10th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Parker Place and Moffat Drive.

5. That the students living south of Grangeville Boulevard, west of 10th Avenue, north of Florinda Street, and east of Douty Street walk to the bus stop at Harris Street and Cameron Street for pick-up and Douty Street and Cameron Street for drop-off.

Page 483 of 698 ends

Page 484 of 698 ends

Page 485 of 698 ends

Page 486 of 698 ends

Page 56 of 63 ends

JEFFERSON SCHOOL
Suggested Route to School
The key elements of this plan are as follows:

1. That the students living south of Fargo Avenue, east of 12th Avenue, west of Santa Fe Railroad tracks, north of Grangeville Boulevard, walk to the bus stop at Simas School.

2. That the students living south of Fargo Avenue, east of Santa Fe Railroad, west of Peoples Ditch, north of Cortner Street walk to the bus stop at Cortner Street and Glacier Way.

3. That the students living south of Fargo Avenue, east of 11th Avenue, west of Peoples Ditch, north of Cortner Street walk to the bus stop at Fargo Avenue and Fountain Plaza Drive.

4. That the students living south of Fargo Avenue, west of Douty Street, north of Grangeville Boulevard, east of 11th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Monroe School.

5. That the students living south of Cortner Street, west of 11th Ave, north of Grangeville Boulevard, east of Santa Fe Railroad walk to the bus stop at Rodgers Road and Conquistador Street.

6. That the students living south of Grangeville Boulevard, west of 12th Avenue, north of Greenfield Avenue, east of Centennial Drive walk to the bus stop at Greenfield Avenue and Kaplan Place.

7. That the students living south of Greenfield Avenue, west of 12th Avenue, north of Merritt Street, east of Centennial Drive walk to the bus stop at Cerritos Avenue and Greenfield Avenue.

8. That the students living south of Merritt Street, west of 12th Avenue, north of Lacey Boulevard, east of Centennial Drive walk to the bus stop at Liberty Street and Marymont Avenue.

9. That the students living south of Greenfield Avenue, west of Centennial Drive, north of Independence Place, east of Magna Carta Avenue walk to the bus stop at Centennial Drive and Charlie Chambers Drive.

10. That the students living south of south of Independence Place, west of Centennial Drive, north of Lacey Boulevard, east of 13th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Lacey Boulevard and Magna Carta Avenue.

11. That the students living south of Malone Street, west of University Avenue, north of Greenfield Avenue, east of 12th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Greenfield Avenue and Pleasant Way.

Page 487 of 698 ends

Jefferson School, Suggested Route to School, continued

Page 57 of 63 ends

12. That the students living south of Grangeville Boulevard, west of Santa Fe Railroad, north of Dominic Way, west of Campus Drive, north of Greenfield Avenue, east of University Ave walk to the bus stop at Grangeville Boulevard and Mildred Street.

13. That the students living south of Dominic Way, west of Santa Fe Railroad, north of Lacey Boulevard, east of Campus Drive walk to the bus stop at Greenfield Avenue and Elm Street.

14. That the students living south of Grangeville Boulevard, west of Douty Street, north of Florinda Street, east of 11th Avenue walk to Jefferson School.

15. That the students living south of Florinda Street, west of Douty Street, north of Lacey Boulevard, east of Santa Fe Railroad walk to the bus stop at Woodrow Wilson for transfer to Jefferson.

16. That the students living south of Fargo Avenue, west of 10th Avenue, north of Grangeville Boulevard, east of Douty Street walk to the bus stop at George Washington School.

17. That the students living south of Fargo Avenue, west of Fernwood Drive, north of Burlwood Avenue, east of 10th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Neill Way and Cedarwood Street.

18. That the students living south of Burlwood Avenue, west of Fernwood Drive, north of Leland Way, east of 10th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Lakewood Drive east of Knowlwood Drive.

19. That the students living south of Fargo Avenue, west of Highway 43, north of Leland Way, east of Fernwood Drive walk to the bus stop at Fargo Avenue and 9 ¼ Avenue.

20. That the students living south of Leland Way, west of 9 ¼ Avenue, north of Grangeville Boulevard, east of 10th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Hamilton School.

21. That the students living south of Florinda Street, west of 10th Avenue, north of Seventh Street, west of Douty Street walk to the bus stop at Tenth Street and Brown Street.

22. That the students living south of Grangeville Boulevard, west of 10th Avenue, north of Florinda Street, west of Douty Street walk to the bus stop at Tenth Street and Brown Street.

23. That the students living south of Grangeville Boulevard, west of 9 ¼ Avenue, north of Lacey Boulevard, east of Lassen Drive, north of Whitney Drive and east of 10th Ave walk to the bus stop at John F. Kennedy Jr. High School.

24. That the students living south of San Joaquin Railroad, west of Vista Avenue, north of Lacey Boulevard, east of Coast Avenue walk to the bus stop at Sierra Drive.

25. That the students living south of Florinda Street, west of Coast Avenue, north of Lacey Boulevard, east of 9 ¼ Avenue walk to the bus stop at Lacey Boulevard and Carolyn Avenue.

Page 488 of 698 ends

Jefferson School, Suggested Route to School, continued

Page 58 of 63 ends

26. That the students living south of Whitney Drive, west of Lassen Drive, north of Lacey Boulevard, east of 10th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Lacey Boulevard and Jessie Avenue.

27. That the students living south of Lacey Boulevard, west of 11th Avenue, north of Highway 198, east of 12th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Campus Drive and Sixth Street.

28. That the students living south of Seventh Street, west of 10th Avenue, north of Highway 198, east of Douty Street walk to the bus stop at 10th Avenue and Fifth Street.

29. That the students living south of Lacey Boulevard, west of 9 ¼ Avenue, north of San Joaquin Railroad, east of 10th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Lacey Boulevard and Wilson Lane.

30. That the students living south of San Joaquin Railroad, west of Wilson Lane, north of Highway 198, east of 10th Avenue walk to the bus stop at 10th Avenue and Fifth Street.

31. That the students living south and west of Bengston Avenue, north of Hanford-Armona Road, east of 12th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Hanford-Armona Road and Ogden Street.

32. That the students living south of Highway 198, west of 11th Avenue, north of Hanford- Armona Road, east of Bengston Avenue walk to the bus stop at Roosevelt School.

33. That the students living south of Highway 198, west of 10th Avenue, north of Hanford- Armona Road, east of Santa Fe Railroad walk to the bus stop at Harris Street and First Street at Coe Park.

34. That the students living south of Hanford-Armona Road, west of Country Place, north of Banneker Street, east of 12th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Hanford-Armona Road and Bengston Avenue.

35. That the students living south of Hanford-Armona Road, west of 11th Avenue, north of Houston Avenue, east of Carmel Way walk to the stop at M.L.K. School.

36. That the students living south of Hanford-Armona Road, west of Santa Fe Railroad, north of Houston Ave, east of 11th Avenue walk to the bus stop at 11th Avenue and Thompson Drive.

37. That the students living south of Hanford-Armona Road, west of 10 ½ Avenue, north of Thompson Drive, east of Santa Fe Railroad walk to the bus stop at Hanford-Armona Road and 10 ½ Avenue.

Page 489 of 698 ends

Jefferson School, Suggested Route to School, continued

Page 59 of 63 ends

38. The students living south of Hanford-Armona Road, west of 10 ½ Avenue, north of Houston Avenue, east of Santa Fe Railroad walk to the bus stop at 10 ½ Avenue north of Houston Avenue.

39. That the student living south of Hanford-Armona Road, west of Fran Drive, north of Houston Avenue, east of 10 ½ Avenue walk to the stop at Hanford-Armona Road and Jordan Way.

40. That the students living south of Hanford-Armona Road, west of 10th Avenue, north of Camino Ramon, east of Fran Drive walk to the bus stop at 10th Avenue south of Hanford- Armona Road.

Page 490 of 698 ends

Page 491 of 698 ends

Page 492 of 698 ends

KENNEDY JR. HIGH SCHOOL
Suggested Route to School
The key elements of this plan are as follows:

Page 48 of 63 ends

1. That the students living south of Fargo Avenue, west of 10th Avenue, north of Grangeville Boulevard, and east of Douty Street walk to the bus stop at Washington School.

2. That the students living south of Fargo Avenue, west of Fernwood Drive, north of Burlwood Avenue, and east of 10th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Fargo Avenue and Neill Way.

3. That the students living south of Fargo Avenue, west of 9¼ Avenue, north of Leland Way, and east of Fernwood Drive walk to the bus stop at Fargo Avenue and 9¼ Avenue.

4. That the students living south of Burlwood Avenue, west of Fernwood Drive, south of Leland Way, west of 9 ¼ Avenue, north of Grangeville Boulevard and east of 10th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Hamilton School.

5. That the students living south of Grangeville Boulevard, west of 9¼ Avenue, north of Freeway 198, east of Douty Street, walk to Kennedy Jr. School.

6. That the students living south of Freeway 198, west of 10th Avenue, north of Hanford- Armona Road, and east of 11th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Lincoln School.

7. That the students living south of Hanford-Armona Road, west of Santa Fe Railroad tracks, north of Houston Avenue, east of 11th Avenue walk to the bus stop at 11th Avenue and Thompson Drive.

8. That the students living south of Hanford-Armona Road, west of 10½ Avenue, north of Houston Avenue, and east of Santa Fe Railroad tracks walk to the bus stop at Hanford- Armona Road and 10½ Avenue.

9. That the students living south of Hanford-Armona Road, west of Foggy Bottom Road, north of Orchard Drive, and east of 10½ Avenue walk to the bus stop at Hanford-Armona Road and Jordan Way and the bus stop at 10th Avenue south of Hanford-Armona Road at Faria′s Bakery.

10. That the students living south of Hume Avenue, west of 11th Avenue, north of Houston Avenue and east of 12th Avenue walk to the bus stop at MLK School.

Page 493 of 698 ends

Page 494 of 698 ends

Page 495 of 698 ends

WILSON JR. HIGH

Page 51 of 63 ends

SCHOOL

Suggested Route to
School The key elements of this plan are as follows:

1. That the students living south of Fargo Avenue, west of Santa Fe Railroad tracks, north of Grangeville Boulevard, and east of 12th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Simas School.

2. That the students living south of Fargo Avenue, west of 11th Avenue, north of Cortner Street, and east of Santa Fe Railroad tracks walk to the bus stop at Fargo Avenue and Fountain Plaza Drive.

3. That the students living south of Cortner Street, west of 11th Avenue, north of Grangeville Boulevard, and east of the Santa Fe Railroad tracks walk to Wilson Jr. High School.

4. That the students living south of Fargo Avenue, west of Douty Street, north of Grangeville Boulevard, and east of 11th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Monroe School.

5. That the students living south of Grangeville Boulevard, west of Centennial Drive, north of Bryman Street, and east of 13th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Malone Street and Centennial Drive.

6. That the students living south of Grangeville Boulevard, west of 12th Avenue, north of Greenfield Avenue, and east of Centennial Drive walk to the bus stop at Greenfield Avenue and Kaplan Place.

7. That the students living south of Greenfield Avenue, west of 12th Avenue, north of Merritt Street, and east of Centennial Drive walk to the bus stop at Cerritos Avenue and Greenfield Avenue.

8. That the students living south of Merritt Street, west of 12th Avenue, north of Lacey Boulevard, and east of Centennial Drive walk to the bus stop at Liberty Street and Marymont Avenue.

9. That the students living south of Grangeville Boulevard, west of Fitzgerald Lane, south of Malone Street, west of University Avenue, north of Greenfield Avenue, and east of 12th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Pleasant Way and Greenfield Avenue.

10. That the students living south of Grangeville Boulevard, west of University Avenue, north of Malone Street, and east of Fitzgerald Lane walk to the bus stop at Rosewood Lane and Grangeville Boulevard.

Page 496 of 698 ends

Page 52 of 63 ends

Wilson Jr High School, Suggested Route to School, continued

12. That the students living south of Grangeville Boulevard, west of Douty Street, north of Florinda Street, west of Brown Street, north of Eleventh Street, west of Douty Street, north of Lacey Boulevard, east of Campus Drive, south of Dominic Way, and east of Santa Fe Railroad tracks walk to Wilson Jr. High School.

13. That the students living south of Lacey Boulevard, west of 12th Avenue, north of San Joaquin Valley Railroad tracks, and east of 13th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Lacey Boulevard and Hofman’s Nursery.

14. That the students living south of Lacey Boulevard, west of Douty Street, north of Freeway 198, and east of 12th Avenue walk to Wilson Jr. High School.

15. That the students living south of Freeway 198, west of Ogden Street, south and west of Bengston Avenue, north of Hanford-Armona Road, and east of 12th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Hanford-Armona Road and Ogden Street.

16. That the students living south of Freeway 198, west of 11th Avenue, north of Hanford- Armona Road, and east of Bengston Avenue walk to the bus stop at Roosevelt School.

17. That the students living south of Hanford-Armona Road, west of the extension of Country Place/Kimball Avenue/Butternut Drive, north of Hume Avenue, and east of 12th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Hanford-Armona Road and Centennial Park.

18. That the students living south of Hanford-Armona Road, west of 11th Avenue, north of Hume Avenue, and east of the extension of Butternut Drive/Kimball Avenue/Country Place walk to the bus stop at King School.

Page 497 of 698 ends

Page 498 of 698 ends

Page 499 of 698 ends

Page 500 of 698 ends

Page 11 of 63 ends

FRONTIER SCHOOL

Suggested Route to School
The key elements of this plan are as follows:

1. That the students living south of Flint Avenue, west of Highway 43, north of Coronado Place, and east of Caronette Lane/Court walk to the bus stop at Mission Drive and Adobe Ct.

2. That the students living south of Coronado Place, west of 10 th Avenue, north of Encore Drive, and east of Caronette Lane/Court walk to the bus stop at Fairmont Drive and Miramar Avenue.

3. That the students living south of Flint Avenue, west of Caronette Court, north of Sherwood Drive, and east of Douty Street walk to the school bus stop at Douty Street and Windsor Drive.

4. That the students living south of Encore Drive, west of 10 th Avenue, north of Orange Street, and east of Caronette Lane walk to the bus stop at Fairmont Drive and Palm Circle.

5. That the students living south of Orange Street, west of 10 th Avenue, north of Fargo Avenue and east of Caronette Lane walk to the bus stop at Fairmont Drive and Redwood Street.

6. That the students living south of Encore Drive, west of Caronette Lane, north of Fargo Avenue and east of Douty Street walk to the bus stop at Douty Street and Solar Drive.

7. That the students living south of Fargo Avenue, west of 12 th Avenue, north of Sangiovese Street, east of Centennial Drive walk to the bus stop at Fargo Avenue and Corvina Place.

8. That the students living south of Sangiovese Street, west of 12 th Avenue, north of Mallard Way and east of Centennial Drive walk to the bus stop at 12 th Avenue and Muscat Place.

9. That the students living south of Mallard Way, west of Zinfandel Drive, north of Grangeville Boulevard, and east of Centennial Drive walk to Frontier School.

10. That the students living south of Fargo Ave, west of Centennial Drive, north of Grangeville Boulevard, and east of 13
th Ave walk to Frontier School.

Page 501 of 698 ends

Page 502 of 698 ends

Page 503 of 698 ends

Page 14 of 63 ends

PIONEER SCHOOL

Suggested Route to School
The key elements of this plan are as follows:

1. That the students living south of Flint Avenue, west of Douty Street, north of Millbrook Street and east of Joshua Street walk to the bus stop at Douty Street and Pioneer Way.

2. That the students living south of Flint Avenue, west of Joshua Street, north of Millbrook Street, and east of 11 th Ave walk to the bus stop at the corner of 11 th Ave and Pioneer Way.

3. That the students south of Flint Avenue, west of Peoples Ditch, north of Summer Street and east of BN & SF Railroad walk to the bus stop on the east side of Glacier Way at the park.

4. That the students living south of Summer Street, west of Peoples Ditch, north of Julia Way, and east of BN & SF Railroad tracks walk to the bus stop at Glacier Way and Saffron Street.

5. That the students living south of Furlong Drive, west of 11 th Avenue, north of Julia Way and east of Peoples Ditch walk to the bus stop at Saffron Street and Fountain Plaza Drive.

6. That the students living south of Millbrook Street, west of Aspen Street, north of Cinnamon Avenue and east of 11 th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Saffron Street and Tarragon Avenue.

7. That the students living south of Pioneer Middle School, west of Douty Street, north of Sherwood Drive, and east of Aspen Street walk to the bus stop at Douty Street and Fareway Avenue.

8. That the students living south of Julia Way, west of Peoples Ditch, north of Sandstone Drive and east of BN & SF Railroad tracks walk to the bus stop at Glacier Way and Pepper Drive.

9. That the students living south of Julia Way, west of 11 th Avenue, north of Sandstone Court and east of Peoples Ditch walk to the bus stop at Pepper Drive and Fountain Plaza Drive.

10. That the students living south of Cinnamon Avenue, west of Aspen Street, north of Pepper Drive and east of 11 th Avenue walk to the bus stop at Windsor Drive and Fir Street.

11. That the students living south of Sherwood Drive, west of Douty Street, north of Fargo Avenue, and east of Aspen Drive walk to the bus stop at Douty Street and Encore Drive.

12. That the students living south of Sandstone Drive, west of Peoples Ditch, north of Fargo Avenue and east of BN & SF Railroad tracks walk to the bus stop at Northstar Drive and Glacier Way.

Page 504 of 698 ends

Page 15 of 63 ends

Pioneer School, Suggested Route to School, continued

13. That the students living south of Sandstone Court, west of 11 th Avenue, north of Fargo Avenue and east of Peoples Ditch walk to the bus stop at Northstar Drive and Fountain Plaza Drive.

14. That the students living south of Pepper Drive, west of Aspen Street, north of Fargo Avenue and east of 11 th Avenue walk to the bus stop on Northstar Drive between 11 th Avenue and Aspen Street.

Page 505 of 698 ends

Page 506 of 698 ends

Page 507 of 698 ends

Page 508 of 698 ends

Page 19 of 63 ends

PIONEER MIDDLE SCHOOL

Suggested Route to School
The key elements of this plan are as follows:

1. That the students living south of Flint Avenue, west of 10 th Avenue, north of Fargo Avenue and east of Douty Street walk to Pioneer Middle School using the Douty Street/Fairway Avenue intersection crosswalk.

2. That the students living south of Flint Avenue, west of Douty Street, north of Fargo Avenue, and east of 11 th Avenue walk to Pioneer Middle School.

3. That the students living south of Flint Avenue, west of 11 th Avenue, north of Julia Way and east of BN & SF Railroad tracks walk to the bus stop at Saffron Street west of Peoples Ditch.

4. That the students living south of Julia Way, west of 11 th Avenue, north of Sandstone Drive and east of BN&SF Railroad tracks walk to the bus stop at Pepper Drive west of Peoples Ditch.

5. That the students living south of Sandstone Drive, west of 11 th Avenue, north of Fargo Avenue and east of BN&SF Railroad tracks walk to the bus stop at North Star Drive west of Peoples Ditch.

6. That the students living south of Fargo Avenue, west of 12 th Avenue, north of Mallard Way and east of Centennial Drive walk to the bus stop at 12 th Avenue north of Sangiovese Street.

7. That the students living south of Mallard Way, west of Zinfandel Drive and north of Grangeville Boulevard, east of Vintage Ave walk to the bus stop at east side of Vintage Ave south of Bristol Lane.

8. That the students living south of Mallard Way, west of Vintage Avenue, north of Grangeville Boulevard and east of Centennial Drive walk to the bus stop at west side of Vintage Avenue south of Bristol Lane.

9. That the students living south of Fargo Avenue, west of Centennial Drive, north of Vineyard Court and east of Jules Street walk to the bus stop at west side of Centennial Drive at south of Dali Way.

10. That the students living south of Vineyard Court, west of Centennial Drive, north of Devon Street and east of 13 th Ave walk to the bus stop at the west side of Centennial Drive north of Muscat Place.

11. That the students living south of Devon Street, west of Centennial Drive, north of Heather Lane and east of Mustang Drive walk to the bus stop at west side of Centennial Drive south of Devon street.

Page 509 of 698 ends

Page 20 of 63 ends

12. That the students living south of Heather Lane, west of Centennial Drive, north of Berkshire Lane and east of Mustang Drive walk to the bus stop at west side of Centennial Drive north of Bristol Lane.

13. That the students living south of Fargo Avenue, west of Jules Street, north of Devon Street and east of 13 th Avenues walk to the bus stop at south side of Devon Street west of Centennial Drive.

14. That the students living south of Devon Street, wes t of Mustang Drive, north of Grangeville Boulevard and east of 13 th Avenues walk to the bus stop at west side of Centennial Drive north of Bristol Lane.

Page 510 of 698 ends

Page 511 of 698 ends

Page 512 of 698 ends

11.F.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 7/2/2024 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Award of a construction contract to W.M. Lyles of Fresno, CA, in the amount of $264,800, and additional Appropriation of $300,000 from the Wastewater Fund (2073, CIP #824011) for the installation of a submersible stand-by pump for use at the Wastewater Treatment Facility.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with W.M. Lyles Company, of Fresno, CA, for the installation of a stand-by pump and other appurtenances at the Wastewater Treatment Facility Headworks in the amount of $264,800; and

2. Authorize the appropriation of $300,000 from the Wastewater Fund (2073, CIP #824011) for the installation of the pump.

Recommended Motion:

1. I move to authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract with W.M. Lyles Company for the installation of a stand-by pump and other appurtenances at the Wastewater Treatment Facility Headworks in the amount of $264,800; and

2. To approve the appropriation of $300,000 from the Wastewater Fund (2073, CIP #824011) for installation of the pump.

BACKGROUND:

This item is for the award of a construction contract for the installation of a submersible pump at the Wastewater Treatment Facility Headworks. Procurement of the submersible pump was previously approved by City Council at the March 5, 2024 City Council Meeting. The pump had a 16 to18 week lead time for which Staff expects delivery by early July.

This pump is critical to the operations of the WWTP should the primary headworks pump fail resulting in a catastrophic spill. The pump will be activated upon the malfunction or failure of one of the two headwork pumps as these are the main pumps that lifts the wastewater sewage, collected city-wide, and into the treatment facility’s processing cycle.

Failure of both headwork pumps would result in a wastewater back-up in the sanitary system and

Page 513 of 698 ends

spillover out of the upstream manholes (approximately 8-hours after failure). Both pumps were installed in 2003 and have a life expectancy of 20-25 years. One of the pumps is planned for replacement towards the end of this fiscal year. The 2nd pump will be addressed, if possible, during the future plant upgrade.

Bidding Process:

A formal City bid process was conducted beginning May 3, 2024 and closed May 17, 2024. City staff opened two (2) bids submitted for the project. Per the construction bid documents, the apparent low bid was established by the lowest Base Bid. The results are summarized below, listed in order from lowest to highest bid:

No. Contractor Location Bid Amount

1. W.M. Lyles Company Fresno, CA $264,800

2. GSE Construction Company, Inc. Livermore, CA $326,000

Staff reviewed the bids and found both to be responsive. W.M. Lyles’s bid proposal was determined to be the lowest qualified and responsible bidder. Previous experience working with Lyles has been favorable and their listed subcontractors are qualified for the work listed in the project scope. Based on the above, Staff recommends that Lyles be awarded the contract for this project.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The construction element of this project is not funded. However, appropriation of funds for procurement of the submersible fund was previously approved at the March 5, 2024 City Council Meeting. The budget summary of this project is as follows:

FUNDING:

Wastewater Fund (2073-824011) $ 79,000 Total Project Budget $ 79,000

ESTIMATED PROCT COSTS:

Vaughn Submersible Pump $ 78,259 Construction (Lyles) $ 264,800 Construction Contingency (10%) $ 26,480 Total Estimated Project Cost: $ 369,539

Project Budget Surplus or (Deficit): $ (290,539)

Based on the above available funds and the resultant estimated budget deficit, an appropriation is needed to complete the work. Therefore, it is recommended that City Council approve an appropriation of $300,000 from the Wastewater Capital Fund (CIP #824011) to fund the construction element of this project. Any surplus funds following completion of the project will be unencumbered back to their originating fund source.

ATTACHMENTS:

None

Page 514 of 698 ends

11.G.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 7/2/2024 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Adoption of the City of Hanford fiscal year 2024-25 Investment Policy

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: That City Council, by motion, adopt the City of Hanford fiscal year 2024- 25 Investment Policy

Recommended Motion: I move to adopt a City of Hanford fiscal year 2024-25 Investment Policy BACKGROUND:

The City’s cash is one of Hanford’s most valuable assets. The use of that cash and safekeeping is an important function of the City. Cash on hand can also be a source of significant income if used wisely. As a result, the Council has some oversight responsibilities, namely:

1) The annual review and adoption of the City’s investment policy; 2) Delegation of investment authority to the Finance Director/Treasurer.

Investment Policy updates
The proposed 2024-25 investment policy, Exhibit A, is attached for Council’s review. There are minor updates to the policy.
1) Updates to reference CA Debt and Investment Advisory Commission January 1, 2024 2) Update to 7.0 Authorized Financial Dealers and Institutions to include Registered Investment Advisers
3) Update to 13.0 Diversification for clarity

Delegation of Investment Authority
The Council needs to annually delegate investment authority to the Finance Director/Treasurer as shown in the City’s Investment Policy. By adopting the City’s Investment Policy, the authority will again be delegated to the Finance Director/Treasurer.

Summary
The most important point in managing the City’s cash is to remember the purpose of the cash is to provide the residents of Hanford with services; earning investment returns is a secondary goal. The proposed changes in the investment policy and the investment report are designed to follow the SLY acronym: Safety, Liquidity and Yield. While some investments in government agencies lose value, the City's will continue to gain value. Keeping the City’s cash safe allows everyone to sleep well at

Page 515 of 698 ends

night.

FISCAL IMPACT:

This action provides an update to the City's investment policy for generating yield on investments following the 'SLY' approach.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. 2024 City of Hanford Investment Policy 2024-2025

Page 516 of 698 ends

CITY OF HANFORD

2024-2025

INVESTMENT POLICY

Page 517 of 698 ends

1 TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Topic Page

1.0 Introduction 1

2.0 Scope 1

3.0 Prudence 2

4.0 Investment Objectives 2

5.0 Delegation of Authority 2

6.0 Ethics and Conflicts of Interest 2

7.0 Authorized Financial Dealers and Institutions 3

8.0 Authorized and Suitable Investments 3

9.0 Review 5

10.0 Investment Pools/Mutual Funds 5

11.0 Collateralization 5

12.0 Safekeeping and Custody 6

13.0 Diversification 6

14.0 Maximum Maturities 6

15.0 Internal Controls 6

16.0 Performance Standards 6

17.0 Reporting 6

18.0 Investment Policy Adoption 6

19.0 Glossary 7

Page 518 of 698 ends

2 City of Hanford, California
Investment Policy

1.0 INTRODUCTION
The City of Hanford (City) has a fiduciary responsibility to maximize the productive use of its liquid assets entrusted to its care and to manage those public funds wisely and prudently.

The purpose of this document is to identify various policies and procedures that enhance opportunities for a prudent and systematic investment policy and to organize and formalize investment-related activities. Related activities which comprise good cash management include accurate cash projections, the expeditious collection of revenue, the control of disbursements, cost-effective banking relations, and short-term borrowing program which coordinates working capital requirements and investment opportunity. It is the policy of the City to invest public funds in a manner that will provide high investment return with the maximum security while meeting the daily cash flow demands of the entity and conforming to all state and local statutes governing the investment of public funds.

2.0 SCOPE
It is intended that this policy cover all funds and investment activities under the direct authority of the City. This policy also covers any funds held by fiscal agents in connection with the issuance of any bonds by the City.

Such funds shall be invested in accordance with the applicable trust indenture.

These funds are accounted for in the City's Audited Financial Statements or Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) and include:

General Fund
Special Revenue Funds
Debt Service Funds
Capital Project Funds
Enterprise Funds
Internal Service Funds
Trust and Agency Funds

Page 519 of 698 ends

3 Funds Held by Fiscal Agents
Any new funds created by the City Council (unless specifically exempted)

3.0 PRUDENCE
The standard of prudence to be used by city officials responsible for the investment of public funds shall be the “prudent person” standard as set forth in California Code Section 53600.3 and shall be applied in the context of managing the overall city portfolio of funds. Investment officers acting in accordance with written procedures and the investment policy and exercising due diligence shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual’s security risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely fashion and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments.

4.0 INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES

4.1 Safety. It is the primary duty and responsibility of the Treasurer to protect, preserve, and maintain cash and investments placed in his trust on behalf of the City. The safety or risk associated with an investment refers to the potential loss of principal, accrued interest or a combination of the two.

4.2 Liquidity. An adequate percentage of the portfolio should be maintained in liquid short-term securities which can be converted to cash if necessary to meet disbursement requirements. Since all cash requirements cannot be anticipated, investments in securities with active secondary or resale markets is highly recommended.

Emphasis should be on marketable securities with low sensitivity to market risk.

4.3 Yield. Yield should become a consideration only after the basic requirements of safety and liquidity have been met. The investment portfolio shall be designed to attain a market average rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the City's risk constraints, the cash flow characteristics of the portfolio, and State and Local laws, ordinances or resolutions that restrict investments. Examples of yield benchmarks are U. S. Treasuries from bills to 5 year notes and the average Fed Funds Rate.

4.4 Public Trust. All participants in the investment process shall act as custodians of the public trust.

Investment officials shall recognize that the investment portfolio is subject to public review and evaluation. The overall program shall be designed and managed with a degree of professionalism that is worthy of public trust.

It is the City's intent, at the time of purchase, to hold all investments until maturity. In a diversified portfolio it must be recognized that occasional measured losses are inevitable, and must be considered within the context of the overall portfolios investment return, provided that adequate diversification has been implemented.

5.0 DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
California Government Code Section 53607 provides the authority of the legislative body of the local agency to invest the funds of the local agency or to delegate that authority to the treasurer of the local agency. The Treasurer is authorized by City ordinance to manage the investment needs of the City. The Treasurer will establish a system of controls to regulate the activities of staff authorized to invest, specifically the Finance Manager or Financial Analyst, and procedures in the absence of the Treasurer.

Page 520 of 698 ends

4 6.0 ETHICS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The City Treasurer and those employees that are involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activity that could conflict with proper execution of the investment program or which could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions. Employees and investment officials shall disclose to the City Council any material financial interests in financial institutions that conduct business with their jurisdiction and shall further disclose any large personal financial investment positions that could be related to the performance of the City.

7.0 AUTHORIZED FINANCIAL DEALERS, INSTITUTIONS, AND REGISTERED INVESTMENT

ADVISERS
The City shall transact business with nationally or state chartered banks, federal or state savings and loan institutions, registered primary securities dealers and qualified regional dealers under SEC Rule 15c3-1 (net capital rule). The City may engage in the services of an external SEC registered Investment Adviser that possesses experience in public fund management.

7.1 Broker Dealers must:

A. be licensed by the States as a broker dealer, as defined in Section 25004 or the Corporations Code.

B. be a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).

C. offer securities appropriate to the City’s needs.

D. have read the City’s Investment Policy.

Page 521 of 698 ends

5 8.0 AUTHORIZED AND SUITABLE INVESTMENTS:

Investment of City funds is governed by the California Government Code Sections 53600, 53601, 53601.5, 53601.6, and 53635. Within the context of the limitations in Figure 1, the following investments are authorized, as further limited herein as updated by California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission January 1, 2024:

Source: CDIAC Local Agency Investment Guide (LAIG), Figure 1 Information as of January 1, 2024A and applicable to all local agenciesB

Page 522 of 698 ends

6 Source: CDIAC Local Agency Investment Guide (LAIG), Figure 1 Information as of January 1, 2024A and applicable to all local agenciesB

Page 523 of 698 ends

7 9.0 REVIEW
The securities held by the City must be in compliance with 8.0 Authorized and Suitable Investments at the time of purchase. The Treasurer will review the portfolio at least quarterly to insure securities are still in compliance and determine if it is necessary to report to council any major or critical incidences of noncompliance.

10.0 INVESTMENT POOLS/MUTUAL FUNDS
The City further stipulates that mutual funds/money market mutual funds are restricted to funds that include only permitted investments under 8.0 Authorized and Suitable Investments.

Governmental sponsored pools and/or mutual funds are included in Section 8.0 Authorized and Suitable Investments; therefore, the City must do due diligence and a thorough investigation of the pool and/or fund prior to investing, and on a continual basis. There shall be a questionnaire; any additional pool shall provide the following:

A. A description of eligible investment securities, and a written statement of investment policy and objectives.

B. A description of interest calculations and how it is distributed, and how gains and losses are treated.

C. A description of how the securities are safeguarded (including the settlement processes), and how often are the securities priced and the program audited.

D. A description of who may invest in the program, how often, and what size deposits and withdrawals are allowed.

E. A schedule for receiving statements and portfolio listings.

F. A list of any reserves, retained earnings, etc. utilized by the pool.

G. A fee schedule, when and how it is assessed.

H. Pool eligibility for bond proceeds and/or pool policy on accepting such proceeds.

11.0 COLLATERALIZATION
Collateralization will be required on two types of investments: certificates of deposit and repurchase agreements. Collateral for non-negotiable certificates of deposit must comply with Government Code 53652.

In addition, if the CD is not FDIC /NCUA insured or goes over the FDIC/NCUA $250,000 limit, collateral is required equal to 110 percent of market value of principal and accrued interest. Collateral for repurchase agreements shall be 102 percent of market value of principal and accrued interest.

The City chooses to limit collateral to the following: US Treasury securities or Federal Agency securities. This will provide an addition level of security due to inevitable changes in market conditions. Collateral will always be held by an independent third party with whom the City has a current custodial agreement. A clearly marked evidence of ownership (safekeeping receipt) must be supplied to the City and retained. The right of collateral substitution is granted, within the parameters and constraints of this Policy.

Page 524 of 698 ends

8 Section 53649 of the California Government Code specifies that the City Treasurer is responsible for entering into deposit contracts with each depository. Investments held with third parties and applicable collateral for the investment shall be properly collateralized in accordance with requirements of the California Government Code.

12.0 SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY
All securities, including collateral for repurchase agreements, entered into by the City shall be held by a third party custodian designated by the Treasurer and evidenced by safekeeping receipts.

13.0 DIVERSIFICATION
The City will diversify the investment portfolio by the type of investment, issuer, and maturity dates in order to mitigate risk in the investment portfolio. With the exception of U. S. Treasury securities, Government Agencies, and authorized pools such as LAIF, not more than 30% of the City’s total investment portfolio will be invested in a single security type or with a single financial institution. Each Government Agency issuer name is limited to not more than 30% of the City’s total investment portfolio.

14.0 MAXIMUM MATURITIES
It is the City’s policy to buy and hold investments until maturity. Maturities of investments will be selected based on cash flow requirements. Investments will have a maximum remaining maturity of only the limitations imposed by government statute or five (5) years from purchase, whichever is shorter. Reserve funds may be invested in securities exceeding 5 years based on the permissible investment maturities dictated by the legal documents.

15.0 INTERNAL CONTROLS
A system of internal controls shall be established to prevent losses of public funds arising from fraud, employee error, and misrepresentations of third parties, unanticipated changes in financial markets or imprudent actions by employees of the City. An independent review of internal control and investment practices, policies and procedures will be provided annually by the City’s external auditor.

16.0 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The investment portfolio shall be invested with the objective of obtaining a market rate of return with considerations to budgetary and economic cycles, commensurate with investment risk constraints and cash flow needs.

17.0 REPORTING
The council has delegated investment authority to the City Treasurer for a one-year period. The Treasurer shall make a monthly report of investment transactions to the legislative body. Section 53607 of the California Government Code states the legislative body, subject to review; many renew the delegation of authority pursuant to this section each year.

Page 525 of 698 ends

9 18.0 INVESTMENT POLICY ADOPTION
The policy shall be reviewed annually by the Treasurer and City Attorney for any revisions. The policy will be submitted to the City Council for their review and approved each fiscal years.

Page 526 of 698 ends

10 19.0 GLOSSARY

GLOSSARY

AGENCIES: Federal agency securities and/or Government-sponsored enterprises.

ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT (ACFR): The official annual report for the City of Hanford. It includes five combined statements for each individual fund and account group prepared in conformity with GAAP. It also includes supporting schedules necessary to demonstrate compliance with finance -related legal and contractual provisions, extensive introductory material, and a detailed Statistical Section.

BANKERS’ ACCEPTANCE (BA): A draft or bill or exchange accepted by a bank or trust company. The accepting institution guarantees payment of the bill, as well as the issuer.

BENCHMARK: A comparative base for measuring the performance or risk tolerance of the investment portfolio. A benchmark should represent a close correlation to the level of risk and the average duration of the portfolio’s investments.

BROKER: A broker brings buyers and sellers together for a commission.

CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT (CD): A time deposit with a specific maturity evidenced by a certificate. Large- denomination CD’s are typically negotiable.

COLLATERAL: Securities, evidence of deposit or other property which a borrower pledges to secure repayment of a loan. Also refers to securities pledged by a bank to secure deposits of public monies.

COMMERCIAL PAPER: Commercial paper is the trade name applied to unsecured promissory notes issued by finance and industrial companies to raise funds on a short term basis.

DEALER: A dealer, as opposed to a broker, acts as a principal in all transactions buying and selling for his own account.

DIVERSIFICATION: Dividing investment funds among a variety of securities offering independent returns.

FEDERAL AGENCY: Federal agencies are special government organizations set up for a specific purpose.

Some examples include: FAMCA, FFCB, FHLB, FHLMC, and FNMA.

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION (FDIC): A federal agency that insures bank deposits, currently up to $250,000 per entity.

FEDERAL FUNDS RATE: The rate of interest at which Fed funds are traded. This rate is currently pegged by the Federal Reserve through open-market operations.

LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF): LAIF was established by the State to enable treasurers
to place funds in a pool for investment. Each agency is limited to an investment of $65 million per account.

LIQUIDITY: A liquid asset is one that can be converted easily and rapidly into cash without a substantial loss of value. In the money market, a security is said to be liquid if the spread between bid and asked prices is narrow and reasonable size can be done at those quotes.

Page 527 of 698 ends

11 MASTER REPURCHASE AGREEMENT: A written contract covering all future transactions between the parties to repurchase – reverse repurchase agreements that establish each party’s rights in the transactions. A master agreement will often specify, among other things, the right of the buyer-lender to liquidate the underlying securities in the event of default by the seller borrower.

MATURITY: The date upon which the principal or stated value of an investment becomes due and payable.

MONEY MARKET: The market in which short -term debt instruments (bills, commercial paper, bankers’ acceptances, etc.) are issued and traded.

NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED STATISTICAL -RATING ORGANIZATION (NRSRO): A nationally recognized statistical rating corporation (NRSRO) is a credit rating agency that issues credit rating that the U.S.

Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) permits other financial firms to use for certain regulatory purposes.

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION (NCUA): Created by the U.S. Congress in 1970, the National Credit Union Administration is an independent federal agency that insures deposits at federally insured credit unions, protects the members who own credit unions, and charters and regulates federal credit unions.

Insured CDs up to a 250,000 limit.

PORTFOLIO: Collection of securities held by an investor.

PRIMARY DEALER: A group of government securities dealers who submit daily reports of market activity and positions and monthly financial statements to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and are subject to its informal oversight. Primary dealers include Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) – registered securities broker-dealers, banks, and a few unregulated firms.

PRUDENT PERSON RULE: An investment standard. In some states the law requires that a fiduciary, such as a trustee, may invest money only in a list of securities selected by the custody state – the so-called legal list. In other states the trustee may invest in a security if it is one which would be bought by a prudent person of discretion and intelligence who is seeking a reasonable income and preservation of capital.

RATE OF RETURN: The yield obtainable on a security based on its purchase price or its current market price.

This may be the amortized yield to maturity on a bond the current income return.

REPURCHASE AGREEMENT (RP OR REPO): A holder of securities sells these securities to an investor with an agreement to repurchase them at a fixed price on a fixed date. The security “buyer” in effect lends the “seller” money for the period of the agreement, and the terms of the agreement a re structure to compensate him for this. Dealers use RP extensively to finance their positions. Exception: When the Fed is said to be doing RP, it is lending money, or increasing bank reserves.

SAFEKEEPING: A service to customers rendered by banks for a fee whereby securities and valuables of all types and descriptions are held in the bank’s vaults for protection.

SECONDARY MARKET: A market made for the purchase and sale of outstanding issues following the initial distribution.

SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC): Agency created by Congress to protect investors in securities transactions by administering securities legislation.

SEC RULE 15C3-1: See Uniform Net Capital Rule.

Page 528 of 698 ends

12 TREASURY BILLS: A non- interest bearing discount security issued by the U.S. Treasury to finance the national debt. Most bills are issued to mature in three months, six months, or one year.

TREASURY NOTES: Medium-term coupon-bearing U.S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U.S. Government and having initial maturities from two to 10 years

UNIFORM NET CAPITAL RULE: Securities and Exchange Commission requirement that member firms as well as nonmember broker-dealers in securities maintain a maximum ratio of indebtedness to liquid capital of 15 to 1; also called net capital rule and net capital ratio. Indebtedness co vers all money owed to a firm, including margin loans and commitments to purchase securities, one reason new public issues are spread among members of underwriting syndicates. Liquid capital includes cash and assets easily converted into cash.

YIELD: The rate of annual income return on an investment, expressed as a percentage. (a) INCOME YIELD is obtained by dividing the current dollar income by the current market price for the security. (b) NET YIELD or YIELD TO MATURITY is the current income yield minus any premium above par or plus any discount from par in purchase price, with the adjustment spread over the period from the date of purchase to the date of maturity of the bond.

Page 529 of 698 ends

11.H.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 7/2/2024 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Council: Introduction of Ordinance No. 24-06 amending Chapter 3.28 of the Hanford Municipal Code to allow for the reestablishment of the Central Parking and Business Improvement Area Advisory Board as required by the Hanford Municipal Code with the addition of language regarding the board composition and how the members shall be appointed.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: That the City Council, by motion, approve the introduction of Ordinance No. 24-06 amending Chapter 3.28 of the Hanford Municipal Code to allow for the reestablishment of the Central Parking and Business Improvement Area Advisory Board as required by the Hanford Municipal Code with the addition of language regarding the board composition and how the members shall be appointed.

BACKGROUND
On April 2, 2024, as part of a presentation to Council regarding downtown matters, Council discussed the City's Business Improvement Area and the required seven-member board, which must be comprised of business owners in the Downtown, that is tasked with making recommendations to Council on funding and other matters in the Business Improvement Area as it relates to the following:

A. The acquisition, construction or maintenance of parking facilities for the benefit of the area; B. The decoration of any public place in the area;
C. The promotion of public events which are to take place on or in public places in the area; D. The furnishing of music in any public place in the area; and E. The general promotion of retail trade activities in the area.

During that discussion, Council reviewed a district map that includes seven districts (each district contains an equal number of businesses) and directed staff to move forward with municipal code amendments to add that the board members represent the BID by districts to ensure that the BID has broad representation among the entire area.

On May 7, 2024, the City Council approved the Introduction of Ordinance No. 24-05, amending Chapter 3.28 of the Hanford Municipal Code to allow for the reestablishment of the Central Parking and Business Improvement Area Advisory Board as required by the Hanford Municipal Code with the addition of staggered 4-year terms consistent with other City Committees/Commissions. More specifically, the proposed ordinance amendments would have:
• Increased the terms of the board members to be consistent with other City commissions;

Page 530 of 698 ends

• Amended the duties of the board to go beyond simple budget matters • Updated various sections related to Business Licensing to be consistent with the current version of Chapters 5.04 and 5.08.
• Amended budget cycle language to be consistent with the City's 2-year budget process.

On June 4, 2024, the Approval and Adoption of the Second Reading of the ordinance to adopt those changes was pulled from the Consent Calendar and Council discussion resulted in a request to bring back a General Business item to reconsider additional language for the ordinance to include a process for how the board would elected/appointed.

On June 18, 2024, the Council directed staff to bring back a new ordinance with additional language regarding the board composition and how the members shall be appointed. This ordinance achieves that goal and staff will come back in the coming weeks with a study session to further discuss the processing for filling the board seats, both initially and when vacancies arise.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There will be no impact to the General Fund related to any changes in the HMC. However, any staff time related to the creation and oversight of an election process would have to be billed to the BID Fund.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. HMC Ordinance 24-06 BID

2. Chapter 3.28 CENTRAL PARKING AND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA - Redline

3. BIA District Map

Page 531 of 698 ends

1 ORDINANCE NO. 24-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HANFORD AMENDING CHAPTER 3.28 OF TITLE 3, GOVERNING THE CENTRAL PARKING AND BUSINESS

IMPROVEMENT AREA
The City Council of Hanford does ordain as follows:

Section 1. Chapter 3.28 of Title 3 is amended in the Hanford Municipal Code, to read as follows:

Chapter 3.28

CENTRAL PARKING AND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA

3.28.010 Authority.

3.28.020 Designation.

3.28.030 Area description.

3.28.040 Use of regular business license taxes within area.

3.28.050 Imposition of tax.

3.28.060 Initial rate of increase or additional levy of business license tax.

3.28.070 Definitions and classifications.

3.28.080 Collection of tax.

3.28.090 Exemption—Voluntary contributions.

3.28.100 Enforcement of provisions.

3.28.110 Proposed uses.

3.28.120 Advisory board.

3.28.130 Regular and additional revenues—Deposits.

3.28.140 Central parking and improvement fund—Established.

3.28.150 Central parking and improvement fund—Use of funds.

3.28.010 Authority.

Page 532 of 698 ends

2 This chapter is adopted pursuant to the authority of the “Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1965,” being Sections 36000 et seq. of the Streets and Highway Code of the state. (Prior code § 3-6.101)

3.28.020 Designation.

There is created and established a parking and business improvement area designated as the “central parking and business improvement area of the city of Hanford,” hereinafter for brevity and convenience referred to as “area.” (Prior code § 3-6.102)

3.28.030 Area description.

A description of the exterior boundaries of said central parking and business improvement area of the city is as follows:

All that certain area situated in the city of Hanford, county of Kings, state of California, more particularly described as follows:

Beginning at the intersection of the center line of Redington Street and Ivy Street; thence northerly along the center line of Redington Street approximately 660 feet to its intersection with the center line of Elm Street; thence easterly along the center line of Elm Street approximately 1,500 feet to the center line of Harris Street; thence southerly along the center line of Harris Street approximately 660 feet to the center line of Ivy Street; thence easterly along the center line of Ivy Street approximately 2,150 feet to the east line of Section 25, said east line being located in the 10th Avenue right-of-way; thence southerly along the east line of said Section 25 approximately 1,300 feet to the north boundary line of the territory annexed by Ordinance No. 651; thence easterly along the boundary line of said annexed territory approximately 190 feet to an angle point in said boundary line, said point being located 10 feet east of the northeast corner of Lot 6 of Block 1 of Orange Addition and also being located on the east line of Assessor’s Parcel No. 14-211-10; thence southerly along said line of Assessor’s Parcel No. 14-211-10 and its southerly prolongation thereof approximately 180 feet to the south line of Section 30, said:
line being located in the Lacey Boulevard right-of-way; thence easterly along the south line of Section 30 a distance of approximately 52.5 feet to its point of intersection with the northeast corner of the territory annexed by Ordinance No. 693, said point being located on a northerly prolongation of the east line of Assessor’s Parcel No. 16-011-12 and being also located 12.5 feet east of a northerly prolongation of the west line of Lot 9 of Block X of Manasse and Simon Addition; thence southerly along the east line of the territory annexed by Ordinance No. 693 a distance of approximately 200 feet to the southeast corner of said annexed territory, said corner being located on the south line of the alley in Block X; thence westerly along the south line of last said annexed territory a distance of approximately 242.5 feet to the east line of Section 36, said line being located in the 10th Avenue right-of-way; thence southerly along said section line in 10th Avenue approximately 1,200 feet to its intersection with the construction center line of State Highway 198; thence westerly along said construction center line of State Highway 198 approximately 4,280 feet to its point of intersection with the east line of the A.T.&S.F. Railroad right-of- way, said line being also an east line for the right-of-way for the former City street

Page 533 of 698 ends

3 named Thornton Street; thence northerly along the east line of said railroad right-of-way and said former street right-of- way and its northerly prolongation thereof to its point of intersection with the south line of Section 25; thence westerly along the south line of said Section 25 approximately 150 feet to its point of intersection with the center line of Park Avenue; thence northerly along the center line of Park Avenue approximately 1,500 feet to its intersection with the center line of Ivy Street; thence easterly along the center line of Ivy Street approximately 1,050 feet to the point of beginning. (Prior code § 3-6.103)

3.28.040 Use of regular business license taxes within area.

Effective July 1, 1975, all revenue from the regular business license taxes collected pursuant to Chapters 5.04 and 5.08 within the central parking and business improvement area of the city of Hanford shall be credited to the central parking and improvement fund for use as established by Sections 3.28.140 and 3.28.150. (Prior code § 3-6.104)

3.28.050 Imposition of tax.

Effective July 1, 1975, there is imposed an initial rate of increase or additional levy of business license tax upon all permanent businesses located within the boundaries of the central parking and business improvement area of the city established by this chapter and which businesses are required to pay a business license tax upon a monthly or quarterly basis under the provisions of Chapter 5.04. (Prior code § 3-6.105)

3.28.060 Initial rate of increase or additional levy of business license tax.

The additional levy of the license tax imposed upon businesses within said area is hereby fixed, levied, determined and established as follows:

A. An amount equal to one hundred (100) percent of the business license taxes imposed by Chapters 5.04 and 5.08, and subsequent amendments thereto, as the same applies to permanent businesses located within said proposed area and which are required to pay a license tax, excluding those businesses which pay license fees based upon average monthly gross receipts; and
B. When the amount of the license fee required by the provisions of Chapters 5.04 and 5.08, and subsequent amendments thereto, applies to permanent businesses located within said proposed area which pay a license tax based upon the amount of gross receipts from the sales of business transacted, the additional levy imposed shall be as follows:

1. An amount equal to one hundred (100) percent on gross annual sales up to five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) per business,

2. An amount equal to fifty (50) percent on all portions of gross annual sales between five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) and one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per business, and

Page 534 of 698 ends

4 3. An amount equal to twenty-five percent (25) on all portions of gross annual sales exceeding one million dollars ($1,000.000.00) per business. (Prior code § 3-6.106)

3.28.070 Definitions and classifications.

The definitions and classifications of business shall be determined by the definitions and classifications set forth in Chapter 5.04 and 5.08 as the same apply to businesses within the area. (Prior code § 3-6.107)

3.28.080 Collection of tax.

The collection of the initial rate of increase or additional levy of business license tax imposed by this chapter shall be made at the same time and in the same manner as the ordinary business license taxes of the city under the provisions of Chapter 5.04 and 5.08 as the same apply to businesses which are required to pay a license tax upon a monthly or quarterly basis. Such tax shall be computed in the manner provided for in Chapter 5.04 and 5.08 and shall be due and payable and subject to the same penalties for delinquencies as provided in Chapter 5.04 and 5.08 of this title as the same applies to businesses paying a regular business license tax on a quarterly or monthly basis. (Prior code § 3-6.108)

3.28.090 Exemption—Voluntary contributions.

Any business, person or institution located within said area, or which is exempt from the payment of the ordinary business license taxes of the city by reason of the laws of the United States or the state shall not be taxed under this chapter but may make a voluntary contribution to the city. Such contributions shall be used for the purposes provided in Section 3.28.110. (Prior code § 3-6.109)

3.28.100 Enforcement of provisions.

It shall be the duty of the director of finance and his or her designee to enforce the provisions of this chapter. The director of finance and his or her designee shall have the power to enforce business license requirements as set forth in Chapter 5.04

3.28.110 Proposed uses.

The uses to which the business license tax imposed by Chapter 5.04 and 5.08 and the additional revenues received by the initial rate of increase or additional levy of business license tax imposed by this chapter and all voluntary contributions are to be put are as follows:

A. The acquisition, construction or maintenance of parking facilities for the benefit of the area;
B. The decoration of any public place in the area;

Page 535 of 698 ends

5 C. The promotion of public events which are to take place on or in public places in the area; D. The furnishing of music in any public place in the area; and E. The general promotion of retail trade activities in the area. (Prior code § 3-6.111)

3.28.120 Advisory board.

For the sole purpose of advising the council and making recommendations on the operation and extent of the area, the methods and ways in which the revenue derived from the levy of the license tax imposed by this chapter shall be used within the scope of the purposes set forth in Section 3.28.110, of this article, and to have and to perform such other powers and duties as the council may determine, there shall be created an advisory board, which shall consist of seven (7) members. Each member shall be selected by the businesses of each district and be known as the district representative. Each district will put forth their district representative to be appointed by the mayor, with the concurrence of the council, for a term of four (4) years, to serve at the pleasure of the mayor and the council, said members to be persons who have businesses within the area that pay an additional levy of license tax as provided for by this chapter. The council may, approve a budget, consistent with the budget cycle used by the City. to include an estimate of expenditures to be made to carry out the purposes of the central parking and business improvement area of the city. (Prior code § 3-6.112)

3.28.130 Regular and additional revenues—Deposits.

The revenues received by the business license tax imposed by Chapters 5.04 and 5.08 from businesses within the area and the additional rate of increase or additional levy of business license tax imposed by this chapter and all voluntary contributions shall be deposited in the central parking and improvement fund created by Section 3.28.140. (Prior code § 3-6.113)

3.28.140 Central parking and improvement fund—Established.

There is established in the city a fund to be designated as the “central parking and improvement fund.” (Prior code § 3-6.201)

3.28.150 Central parking and improvement fund—Use of funds.

All revenues deposited in the central parking and improvement fund shall be used for the following purposes:

Page 536 of 698 ends

6 D. The furnishing of music in any public place in the area; and E. The general promotion of retail trade activities in the area.

Section 2: This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption and shall be published once in the Hanford Sentinel within fifteen (15) days after its passage or a summary of this ordinance shall be published in the Hanford Sentinel in a manner consistent with the requirements of the California Government Code.

PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this ____ day of _________, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES: __________________________________________________________________ NOES: __________________________________________________________________ ABSTAIN: __________________________________________________________________ ABSENT: __________________________________________________________________ ___________________________

TRAVIS PADEN
MAYOR of the City of Hanford
Attest:
_____________________________________

NATALIE CORRAL

CITY CLERK

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF KINGS ) ss

CITY OF HANFORD )
I, ________________________, City Clerk of the City of Hanford, do hereby certify the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford held on the ______ day of __________________, 2024.

Date: _______________________ ________________________________ City Clerk

Page 537 of 698 ends

Hanford, California Municipal Code
Title 3 REVENUE AND FINANCE
Chapter 3.28 CENTRAL PARKING AND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT
AREA

3.28.010 Authority.

3.28.020 Designation.

3.28.030 Area description.

3.28.040 Use of regular business license taxes within area.

3.28.050 Imposition of tax.

3.28.060 Initial rate of increase or additional levy of business license tax.

3.28.070 Definitions and classifications.

3.28.080 Collection of tax.

3.28.090 Exemption—Voluntary contributions.

3.28.100 Enforcement of provisions.

3.28.110 Proposed uses.

3.28.120 Advisory board—Budget.

3.28.130 Regular and additional revenues—Deposits.

3.28.140 Central parking and improvement fund—Established.

3.28.150 Central parking and improvement fund—Use of funds.

3.28.010 Authority.

This chapter is adopted pursuant to the authority of the “Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1965,” being Sections 36000 et seq. of the Streets and Highway Code of the state. (Prior code § 3-6.101)

Page 538 of 698 ends

3.28.020 Designation.

3.28.030 Area description.

A description of the exterior boundaries of said central parking and business improvement area of the city is as follows:

All that certain area situated in the city of Hanford, county of Kings, state of California, more particularly described as follows:

Beginning at the intersection of the center line of Redington Street and Ivy Street; thence northerly along the center line of Redington Street approximately 660 feet to its intersection with the center line of Elm Street; thence easterly along the center line of Elm Street approximately 1,500 feet to the center line of Harris Street; thence southerly along the center line of Harris Street approximately 660 feet to the center line of Ivy Street; thence easterly along the center line of Ivy Street approximately 2,150 feet to the east line of Section 25, said east line being located in the 10th Avenue right-of-way; thence southerly along the east line of said Section 25 approximately 1,300 feet to the north boundary line of the territory annexed by Ordinance No. 651; thence easterly along the boundary line of said annexed territory approximately 190 feet to an angle point in said boundary line, said point being located 10 feet east of the northeast corner of Lot 6 of Block 1 of Orange Addition and also being located on the east line of Assessor’s Parcel No. 14-211-10; thence southerly along said line of Assessor’s Parcel No. 14-211-10 and its southerly prolongation thereof approximately 180 feet to the south line of Section 30, said: line being located in the Lacey Boulevard right-of-way; thence easterly along the south line of Section 30 a distance of approximately 52.5 feet to its point of intersection with the northeast corner of the territory annexed by Ordinance No. 693, said point being located on a northerly prolongation of the east line of Assessor’s Parcel No. 16-011-12 and being also located 12.5 feet east of a northerly prolongation of the west line of Lot 9 of Block X of Manasse and Simon Addition; thence southerly along the east line of the territory annexed by Ordinance No. 693 a distance of approximately 200 feet to the southeast corner of said annexed territory, said corner being located on the south line of the alley in Block X; thence westerly along the south line of last said annexed territory a distance of approximately 242.5 feet to the east line of Section 36, said line being located in the 10th Avenue right-of-way; thence southerly along said section line in 10th Avenue approximately 1,200 feet to its intersection with the construction center line of State Highway 198; thence westerly along said construction center line of State Highway 198 approximately 4,280 feet to its point of intersection with the east line of the A.T.&S.F. Railroad right-of- way, said line being also an east line for the right-of-way for the former City street named Thornton Street; thence northerly along the east line of said railroad right-of-way and said former street right-of- way and its northerly prolongation thereof to its point of intersection with the south line of Section 25; thence westerly along the south line of said Section 25 approximately 150 feet to its point of intersection with the center line of Park Avenue; thence northerly along the center line of Park Avenue approximately 1,500 feet to its intersection with the center line of Ivy Street; thence easterly along the center line of Ivy Street approximately 1,050 feet to the point of beginning. (Prior code § 3-6.103)

Page 539 of 698 ends

3.28.040 Use of regular business license taxes within area.

3.28.140 and 3.28.150 . (Prior code § 3-6.104)

3.28.050 Imposition of tax.

3.28.60 Initial rate of increase or additional levy of business license tax.

The additional levy of the license tax imposed upon businesses within said area is hereby fixed, levied, determined and established as follows:

A. An amount equal to one hundred (100) percent of the business license taxes imposed by Chapters 5.04 and 5.08, and subsequent amendments thereto, as the same applies to permanent businesses located within said proposed area and which are required to pay a license tax upon a monthly or quarterly basis, excluding those businesses which pay quarterly license fees based upon average monthly gross receipts; and
B. When the amount of the license fee required by the provisions of Chapters 5.04 and 5.08, and subsequent amendments thereto, applies to permanent businesses located within said proposed area which pay a quarterly license tax based upon the amount of gross receipts from the sales of business transacted, the additional levy imposed shall be as follows:

1. An amount equal to one hundred (100) percent on gross annual sales up to five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) per business,

2. An amount equal to fifty (50) percent on all portions of gross annual sales between five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) and one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per business, and

3. An amount equal to twenty-five percent (25) on all portions of gross annual sales exceeding one million dollars ($1,000.000.00) per business. (Prior code § 3-6.106)

3.28.070 Definitions and classifications.

Page 540 of 698 ends

3.28.080 Collection of tax.

3.28.090 Exemption—Voluntary contributions.

3.28.100 Enforcement of provisions.

It shall be the duty of the director of finance and his or her designee deputies to enforce the provisions of this chapter. The director of finance and his or her designee deputies and the police officers shall have the power to enforce business license requirements as set forth in Chapter

5.04enter, free of charge, at any time, any place of business for which such license is required and to demand the exhibition of such license. It shall be the duty of all police officers to cause complaints to be filed against all persons violating any of the provisions of this chapter. (Prior code § 3-6.110)

3.28.110 Proposed uses.

3.28.120 Advisory board—Budget.

Page 541 of 698 ends

For the sole purpose of advising the council and making recommendations on the operation and extent of the area, the methods and ways in which the revenue derived from the levy of the license tax imposed by this chapter shall be used within the scope of the purposes set forth in Section 3.28.110 , of this article, and to have and to perform such other powers and duties as the council may determine, there shall be created an advisory board, which shall consist of seven (7) members . Each member shall be selected by the businesses of each district and be known as the district representative. Each district will put forth their district representative to be appointed by the mayor, with the concurrence of the council, for a term of one four (4) years, to serve at the pleasure of the mayor and the council, said members to be persons who have businesses within the area that pay an additional levy of license tax as provided for by this chapter. The council may, annually approve a budget , consistent with the budget cycle used by the City. to include an estimate of expenditures to be made to carry out the purposes of the central parking and business improvement area of the city. (Prior code § 3-6.112)

3.28.130 Regular and additional revenues—Deposits.

3.28.140 Central parking and improvement fund—Established.

There is established in the city a fund to be designated as the “central parking and improvement fund.” (Prior code § 3-6.201)

3.28.150 Central parking and improvement fund—Use of funds.

All revenues deposited in the central parking and improvement fund shall be used for the following purposes:

Page 542 of 698 ends

District 4
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 5
District 6
District 7
Central Parking and
Business Improvement Area

Page 543 of 698 ends

12.A.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 7/2/2024 AGENDA SECTION: PUBLIC HEARING

SUBJECT:

A public hearing to consider the Adoption of Resolution 24-22-R Ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments as outlined in the 2023/2024 Annual Engineer's Report, which has been prepared pursuant to Chapter 3 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The proposed assessments outlined in the Engineer's Report are less than or equal to the authorized maximum assessment for each Landscape Assessment District.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: A public hearing to consider the Adoption of Resolution 24-22-R Ordering the Levy and Collection of Assessments as outlined in the 2023/2024 Annual Engineer's Report, which has been prepared pursuant to Chapter 3 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972.

BACKGROUND:

In accordance with Chapter 3 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (“Act”), an Annual Engineer’s Report addressing adjustments based on a review of the costs of maintenance of public improvements must be prepared and submitted to the City Council for action. The Streets and Highway Code, as referenced in the Act, requires the holding of a public hearing for Landscape Districts identified in the Annual Engineer’s Report as showing an increase, decrease, or no change in the annual assessment amount.

A public hearing will be held at the City Council meeting on July 2, 2024. The City Council shall consider all public input before taking final action on confirming and levying the assessments proposed in the Annual Engineer’s Report. Regarding the Districts identified in the Annual Engineer’s Report showing an increase in the annual assessment amount, the City Council must consider all protests against the proposed increase in the assessment amount and tabulate any protests delivered to the City before the close of the public hearing. Per Article XXX D, Section 4 of the California Constitution, if the ballots submitted in opposition to the increased assessment exceed those submitted in favor of the increased assessment, the assessment amount shall not be increased. If the increase in the assessment to maintain the current level of service for the existing landscape area is voted down, the current level of service may be reduced. In tabulating the protests, the protests shall be weighed according to the proportional financial obligation of each affected parcel of real property.

The Annual Engineer’s Report identifies an increase in the annual assessment from the previous year and the reasons for the increase, including the imposition of 2.8% Standard Annual CPI Increase (December 2023) in accordance with California Government Code section 53739(b)(1) for the following Districts:

District Name

Page 544 of 698 ends

93-02 Vintage Estates
01-01 Pacific Grove Units 1 through 3 and N. Pointe Units 1 through 4 01-02 Cambridge Homes Units 1 through 3
01-03 Poppy Hills Units 1 and 2
01-04 Silver Oaks Units 1 through 5
02-01 Ashton Park Units 1 through 4
03-01 Le Parc Units 1 through 3
04-01 Sidonia Units 1 and 2 and Sidonia Estates II 04-02 Cambridge Homes/Majesty II, #2
04-03 Cambridge Homes - Majesty - #2, Cambridge Homes Units 1 through 6, Cambridge Homes - Vineyards Units1 through 4 04-04 Sierra Heights Units 1 and 2
05-01 Mission Park
05-02 Cooper Valley
06-01 Quail Park Subdivision
07-02 South Gate Addition, Greenbrier Gardens, and Live Oak North 09-01 Victory Estates
09-02 Independence Units 1 and 2
14-01 Independence Units 3 and 4
15-01 Silver Oaks Addition III Units 1 and 2, Lennar Homes Units 1 and 2, and Lennar Homes 15-02 The Greens II
16-01 Woodside Homes
16-02 Mynderup Units 1 and 2
18-01 Bella Vista Units 1 through 4
19-01 Pacific Grove Addition II
19-02 The Enclave
20-01 Woodside Homes
21-01 San Joaquin Valley Homes

The 2023/2024 Annual Engineer's Report identifies the maximum assessment rates are at the maximum assessment rate and do not include an inflationary adjustment for the following Districts" 90-01 Pinecastle Addition Units 1 and 2
90-02 Park Monterey Units 1 and 2
90-03 Massionette Estates Unit 7 and 8
90-04 Hyde Park
91-01 Sierra Vista
92-01 Portofino Estates
92-02 Cielo En Tierra No. 1
93-01 Vintage Estates
94-01 Gateway Estates
94-02 Stonecrest Units 1 through 9
94-03 Quail Run
97-01 Rosewood Estates
97-02 Summer Field
97-03 Country Crossing Units 1 through 5
98-01 Crystal Springs
98-02 Mountain View Estates Units 1 through 6

The Annual Assessments for each of the remaining Districts are at or below Fiscal Year 2023/2024.

The Annual Engineer’s Report also provides the following information as required by Article XIII D, Section 4 of the California Constitution:

Page 545 of 698 ends

1. Identifies all real property parcels with a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which the assessment will be imposed.

2. Determines the appropriate special benefit derived by each parcel of the real property in relation to the entirety of the cost of maintenance of the public improvements.

3. Identifies the special benefit conferred on each parcel of real property.

4. Establishes that the assessment imposed on each parcel of real property does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportionate special benefit conferred on that parcel of real property.

FISCAL IMPACT:

ATTACHMENTS:

1. RESOLUTION 24-22-R Intent to Levy and Collect Assessments

2. FY24-25 Hanford LLMD Consolidated ER (06.26.24 Updated Signed ER, IM 06.18.24, PH

07.02.24)

Page 546 of 698 ends

- 1 -
RESOLUTION NO. 24 - 22 - R

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF HANFORD ORDERING THE LEVY

AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS

At a r e g u l a r meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford duly called and held on July 2, 2024 at 7 :00 p.m., it was moved by Council Member , seconded by Council Member , and duly carried that the following resolution be adopted:

WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Landscaping & Lighting Act of 1972 (Act), the City of Hanford has established the following landscape and lighting assessment districts within the City limits of the City of Hanford.

ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS

90-01 Pinecastle Addition, Unit No. 1, 2, 3 and 4 – (Located East of 10th Avenue and North of Fargo Avenue)
90-02 Park Monterey, Unit No. 1 and 2 – (Located West of Douty Street and North of Sherwood Drive)
90-03 Mansionette Estates, No. 7 and 8 – (Located West of Douty Street and North Encore Drive)
90-04 Hyde Park – (Located East of 12th Avenue and North of Hanford-Armona Road) 91-01 Sierra Vista (Tract 641)/New Dimensions (Tract 703/713), No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 – (Located West of 11th Avenue and South of Hanford-Armona Road)
92-01 Portofino, No. 1, 2, 3 and 4 – (Located East of Neill Way and South of Fargo Avenue) 92-02 Cielo En Tierra, No. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 – (Located West of 11th Avenue and South of Fargo Avenue)
93-01 Vintage Estates – (Located West of 12th Avenue and North of Grangeville Boulevard) 93-02 Walnut Forest, No. 1, 2 and 3 – (Located West of 11th Avenue and North of Hume Avenue) 94-01 Gateway Estates – (Located West of 10th Avenue and North of Encore Drive) 94-02 Stonecrest, No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 – (Located West of 11th Avenue and North of Fargo Avenue)
94-03 Quail Run Estates, No. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 – (Located East of 11th Avenue and North of Pepper Drive)
97-01 Rosewood Estates, No. 1 and 2 – (Located East of 12th Avenue and South of Grangeville Boulevard)
97-02 Summer Field Addition, No. 2 – (Located West 91/4 Avenue and South of Florinda Street) 97-03 Country Crossing, No. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 – (Located West of Centennial Drive and North of Lacey Boulevard)
98-01 Crystal Springs, No. 1, 2 and 3 – (Located West of 91/4 Avenue and North of Grangeville Boulevard)

Page 547 of 698 ends

- 2 -
98-02 Mountain View Estates, No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 – (Located West of 11th Avenue and North of Houston Avenue)
01-01 Pacific Grove (Tract 680/777)/N. Pointe (Tract 778), No. 1, 2, 3 and 4 – (Located East of 12th Avenue and North of Grangeville Boulevard)
01-02 Cambridge Homes (Tract 770), No. 1, 2 and 3 – (Located West of 11th Avenue and North of Pepper Drive)
01-03 Poppy Hills, No. 1 and 2 – (Located West of 11th Avenue and North of Pepper Drive) 01-04 Silver Oaks, No. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 – (Located West of 12th Avenue and North of Grangeville Boulevard)
02-01 Ashton Park, No. 1, 2, 3 and 4 – (Located West of 12th Avenue and North of Lacey Boulevard)
03-01 La Parc, No. 1, 2 and 3 – (Located West of 11th Avenue and South of Fargo Avenue) 04-01 Sidonia Estates, No. 1 and 2 (Tract 810)/Sidonia Estates II (Tract 814) – (Located East of 12th Avenue and North of Hume Avenue)
04-02 Cambridge Homes (Tract 799)/Majesty II (Tract 830) – (Located East of 11th Avenue and South of Flint Avenue)
04-03 Cambridge Homes (Tract 795/826)/Vineyards (Tract 825), No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 – (Located East of 12th Avenue and South of Fargo Avenue)
04-04 Sierra Heights (Tract 802/803), No. 1 and 2 – (Located West of 9th Avenue and North of Fargo Avenue)
05-01 Mission Park – (Located West of Highway 43 and South of Flint Avenue) 05-02 Copper Valley – (Located West of 12th Avenue and South of Fargo Avenue) 06-01 Quail Park Subdivision – (Tract 794), No. 1 and 2, Located West of 11th Avenue and South of Flint Avenue)
07-02 South Gate Addition – (Tract 811)/Greenbrier Gardens (876)/ Live Oak North (902) - (Located West of 12th Avenue and South of Hanford-Armona Road)
09-01 Victory Estates – (Located West of University Avenue and North of Grangeville Boulevard) 09-02 Independence (Tract 843), No. 1 and 2 - (Located West of 12th Avenue and North of Greenfield Avenue)
14-01 Independence (Tract 843), No. 3 and 4 - (Located West of 12th Avenue and North of Merritt Street)
15-01 Silver Oaks Addition III (Tract 887/922), No. 1, 2, and 3 - (Located West of Centennial Drive and North of West Berkshire Lane)
15-02 The Greens II (Tract 823) - (Located West of 9 ¼ Avenue and North of Grangeville Boulevard)
16-01 Woodside Homes (Tract 917) – (Located West of Centennial Drive and South of Grangeville Blvd)
16-02 Myderup (Tract 914), No. 1 and 2 – (Located East of 12th Avenue and North of Hume Avenue)
18-01 Bella Vista (Tract 918/919), No. 1, 2, and 3 – (Located West of Centennial Drive and South of Fargo Avenue)
19-01 Pacific Grove Addition No. 2 (Tract 916) – (Located East of 12th Avenue and North of Bristol Lane)
19-02 Enclave (Track 915) – (Located South of Lacey Blvd. and West Centennial Ave.) 20-01 Woodside Homes (Track 928) – (Located North of Centennial Ave and South of 12th Ave.) 21-01 San Joaquin Valley Homes (Track 929) – (Located North of 13th Ave and West of Devon St.)

(collectively Districts).

Page 548 of 698 ends

- 3 -
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, it is necessary that the City Council review an annual report (Engineer’s Report), which sets forth a full and detailed description of the improvements and boundaries of each District and any zones therein and the proposed annual assessments to be levied upon assessable lots and parcels of land within each District;
WHEREAS, Willdan Financial Services , the appointed Assessment Engineer for the City of Hanford has prepared and filed with the City Clerk, an Engineer’s Report for fiscal year 2023/2024 pursuant to Chapter 3 of the Act , which includes: (1) a full and detailed description of the improvements and boundaries of each District and any zones therein; (2) identifies the proposed annual assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within each District; (3) identifies all parcels of real property which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which the assessment will be imposed; (4) determines the proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel of real property in relationship to the entirety of the cost of maintenance of the public improvements; (5) identifies the special benefit conferred on parcels of real property; and (6) establishes that the assessment imposed on each parcel of real property does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportionate special benefit conferred on that parcel of real property.

WHEREAS, the Engineer’s Report identifies an increase in the annual assessment from the previous year and the reasons for the increase, including the imposition of 2.8% Annual CPI Increase (December 2023) in accordance with California Government Code section 53739(b)(1) for the following Districts:

1. 93-02 Walnut Forest Units 1 through 3

2. 01-01 Pacific Grove Units 1 through 3 and N. Pointe Units 1 through 4

3. 01-02 Cambridge Homes Units 1 through 3

4. 01-03 Poppy Hills Units 1 and 2

5. 01-04 Silver Oaks Units 1 through 5

6. 02-01 Ashton Park Units 1 through 4

7. 03-01 Le Parc Units 1 through 3

8. 04-01 Sidonia Units 1 & 2 and Sidonia Estates II

9. 04-02 Cambridge Homes/Majesty II, #2

10. 04-03 Cambridge Homes-Majesty II #2, Cambridge Homes Units 1 through 6, Cambridge Homes-Vineyards Units 1 through 4

11. 04-04 Sierra Heights Units 1 and 2

12. 05-01 Mission Park

13. 05-02 Copper Valley

14. 06-01 Quail Park Subdivision

Page 549 of 698 ends

- 4 -

15. 07-02 South Gate Addition, Greenbrier Gardens, & Live Oak North

16. 09-01 Victory Estates

17. 09-02 Independence Units 1 & 2

18. 14-01 Independence Units 3 & 4

19. 15-01 Silver Oak Addition II Units 1 and 2, and Lennar Homes

20. 15-02 The Greens II

21. 16-01 Woodside Homes

22. 16-02 Mynderup Units 1 and 2

23. 18-01 Bella Vista Units 1 through 4

24. 19-01 Pacific Grove Addition II

25. 19-02 The Enclave

26. 20-01 Woodside Homes

27. 21-01 San Joaquin Homes

WHEREAS, the Report identifies the maximum assessments rates are at the maximum assessment rate and do not include an inflationary adjustment for the following Districts:

28. 90-01 Pinecastle Addition, Units 1 through 4

29. 90-02 Park Monterey, Units 1 and 2

30. 90-03 Mansionette Estates, Units 7 and 8

31. 90-04 Hyde Park

32. 91-01 Sierra Vista

33. 92-01 Portofino Estates

34. 92-02 Cielo En Tierra, No. 1

35. 93-01 Vintage Estates

36. 94-01 Gateway Estates

37. 94-02 Stonecrest, Units 1 through 9

38. 94-03 Quail Run

39. 97-01 Rosewood Estates

40. 97-02 Summer Field

41. 97-03 Country Crossing, Units 1 through 5

42. 98-01 Crystal Springs

43. 98-02 Mountain View Estates, Units 1 through 6

WHEREAS, the existing improvements within each District include decorative block fencing, landscaping and irrigation systems;
WHEREAS, interested parties should refer to the Engineer’s Report, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk for the City of Hanford, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment districts and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the districts;

Page 550 of 698 ends

- 5 -
WHEREAS, there are no substantial changes proposed to the existing improvements in any District; and
WHEREAS, Streets and Highways Code Section 22624(e) requires the City Council of the City of Hanford to give notice of the time and place for hearing by the City’s legislative body on the levy of the proposed assessments.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hanford approves the Engineer’s Report as submitted for each District; RESOLVED FURTHER, that the City Council of the City of Hanford declares its intention to levy and collect assessments for fiscal year 202 4/2025 within each respective District and each lot thereof, as set forth in the Engineer’s Report for fiscal year 2024/2025.

RESOLVED FURTHER, that the City Council of the City of Hanford shall hold a public hearing on the levy of the proposed assessments set forth in the Engineer’s Report, which public hearing shall occur on July 2, 2024 at the hour of 7:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers of the Civic Auditorium in Hanford, California. At such public hearing, affected property owners will be afforded an opportunity to give oral testimony and submit written comments regarding the proposed assessments.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Hanford at a meeting thereof held on July 2, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

TRAVIS PADEN
MAYOR of the City of Hanford

Attest:

___________________________

NATALIE CORRAL

CITY CLERK

Page 551 of 698 ends

City of Hanford

Fiscal Year 2024/2025
Consolidated Engineer’s Report
Landscaping and Lighting Assessment
Districts

Incorporating Forty-three District Numbers:
90-01, 90-02, 90-03, 90-04, 91-01, 92-01, 92-02, 93-01, 93-02, 94-01, 94-02, 94-03, 97-01, 97-02, 97-03, 98-01, 98-02, 01-01, 01-02, 01-03, 01-04, 02-01, 03-01, 04-01, 04-02, 04-03, 04-04, 05-01, 05-02, 06-01, 07-02, 09-01, 09-02, 14-01, 15-01, 15-02, 16-01, 16-02, 18-01, 19-01, 19-02, 20-01, and 21-01

Intent Meeting: June 18, 2024
Public Hearing: July 2, 2024

CITY OF HANFORD
400 N. DOUTY ST.

HANFORD, CA 93230

JUNE 2024

PREPARED BY

WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES

27368 Via Industria
Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590
T. 951.587.3500|800.755.6864
F. 951.587.3510|888.326.6864

Property Tax Information Line
T. 866.807.6864

www.willdan.com

Page 552 of 698 ends

ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT

City of Hanford
Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Districts
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

City of Hanford,
Kings County, State of California

This Report and the enclosed descriptions, budgets and diagram outline the proposed improvements and assessments for the forty-three (43) Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Districts in the City of Hanford for fiscal year 2024/2025, which includes each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land within District Nos. 90-01, 90-02, 90-03, 90-04, 91-01, 92-01, 92-02, 93-01, 93-02, 94-01, 94-02, 94-03, 97-01, 97-02, 97-03, 98-01, 98-02, 01-01, 01-02, 01-03, 01-04, 02- 01, 03-01, 04-01, 04-02, 04-03, 04-04, 05-01, 05-02, 06-01, 07-02, 09-01, 09-02, 14-01, 15- 01, 15-02, 16-01, 16-02, 18-01, 19-01, 19-02, 20-01, and 21-01, as the same existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the Kings County Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the Districts. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council.

Dated this ____________ day of ______________, 2024.

Willdan Financial Services
Assessment Engineer
On Behalf of the City of Hanford
By: ________________________________
Jim McGuire
Principal Consultant, Project Manager
By: ________________________________
Tyrone Peter
PE # C 81888

19th
June

Page 553 of 698 ends

Table of Contents

Introduction ............................................................................................... 1 Report Content and Annual Proceedings ................................................................ 2 Part I - Plans and Specifications .............................................................. 5 Description of Improvements ................................................................................... 5 Specific District Improvements and Services ......................................................... 6 Part II - Method of Apportionment ......................................................... 15 Legislative Requirements for Assessments ......................................................... 15 Benefit Analysis ....................................................................................................... 16 Assessment Methodology ...................................................................................... 18 Part III - Estimate of Costs...................................................................... 20 Annual Inflationary Adjustment (Assessment Range Formula) .......................... 20 Annual District Budgets .......................................................................................... 21 Part IV - District Diagrams ...................................................................... 24 Part V - Assessment Rolls ...................................................................... 69

Page 554 of 698 ends

Hanford Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Districts
Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Page 1 ends

Introduction
The City of Hanford (“City”), under the provisions of the Landscap ing and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (“1972 Act”) and in compliance with the substantive and procedural requirements of the California State Constitution, Article XIII D (“California Constitution”), annually levies and collects special assessments for the City’s Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Districts designated and referred to as:

(hereafter referred to collectively as “LLMD” and individually as “Districts”) that fund, in whole or in part, the maintenance and operation of local landscaping or landscaping and lighting improvements that provide special benefits to properties within those individual Districts.

District No. Subdivision Name District No. Subdivision Name 90-01 Pinecastle Addition Units 1 - 4 90-02 Park Monterey Units 1 & 2 90-03 Mansionette Units 7 & 8 90-04 Hyde Park
91-01 Sierra Vista & New Dimensions Units 1 - 5 92-01 Portofino Unit Units 1 - 4 92-02 Cielo En Tierra Units 1 - 5 93-01 Vintage Estates 93-02 Walnut Forest Units 1 - 3 94-01 Gateway Estates
94-02 Stonecrest Units 1 - 9 94-03 Quail Run Estates Units 1 - 5 97-01 Rosewood Estates Units 1 & 2 97-02 Summer Field Addition #2 97-03 Country Crossing Units 1 - 5 98-01 Crystal Springs Units 1 - 3 98-02 Mountain View Estates Units 1 - 6 01-01 Pacific Grove Units 1 - 3 and N. Pointe Units 1 - 4
01-02 Cambridge Homes Units 1 - 3 01-03 Poppy Hills Units 1 & 2 01-04 Silver Oaks Units 1 - 5 02-01 Ashton Park Units 1 - 4 03-01 Le Parc Units 1 - 3 04-01 Sidonia Units 1 & 2 and Sidonia Estates II 04-02 Cambridge Homes/Majesty II, #2 04-03
Cambridge Homes -Majesty II - #2,
Cambridge Homes Units 1 - 6,
Cambridge Homes- Vineyards Units 1 - 4
04-04 Sierra Heights Units 1 & 2 05-01 Mission Park
05-02 Copper Valley 06-01 Quail Park Subdivision
07-02 South Gate Addition, Greenbrier Gardens, &
Live Oak North 09-01 Victory Estates
09-02 Independence Units 1 & 2 14-01 Independence Units 3 & 4 15-01 Silver Oaks Addition III Units 1 and 2, Lennar
Homes Units 1 and 2, and Lennar Homes 15-02 The Greens II 16-01 Woodside Homes 16-02 Mynderup Units 1 & 2
18-01 Bella Vista Units 1 - 4 19-01 Pacific Grove Addition II 19-02 The Enclave 20-01 Woodside Homes
21-01 San Joaquin Valley Homes

Page 555 of 698 ends

Hanford Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Districts
Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Page 2 ends

Report Content and Annual Proceedings
This Consolidated Engineer’s Report (the “Report”) has been prepared pursuant to Chapter 1, Article 4 and Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act, and presented to the City Council for their consideration and approval of the proposed improvements and services to be provided within the Districts and the levy and collection of annual assessments related thereto for fiscal year 2024/2025. This Report generally describes the improvements and proposed assessments to be levied in connection with the special benefits the properties will receive from the maintenance and servicing of the improvements within each of the designated Districts for fiscal year 2024/2025. The annual assessments to be levied on properties within these Districts provide a source of funding to fund in whole or in part, the continued operation and maintenance of the landscaping improvements or landscaping and lighting improvements and services to be provi ded by the City through the LLMD that provide special benefits to the properties within each of those Districts and respective developments.

Each fiscal year, the City establishes the LLMD assessments based on an estimate of the costs to maintain, operate and service the authorized improvements within each District and based upon available revenues including assessment revenues, fund balances, general benefit contributions and any additional City contributions from available sources . The costs of the improvements and the proposed annual assessments budgeted and assessed against properties within each District may include, but are not limited to the estimated expenditures for regular annual m aintenance and repairs; incidental expenditures related to the operation and administration of the District; deficits or surpluses from prior years (fund balance); revenues from other sources; and the collection of funds for operational reserves and/or periodic repairs, replacements and rehabilitation projects as authorized by the 1972 Act. The net annual cost to provide the improvements for each District are allocated to the benefiting properties within each District respectively based on an established method of apportionment (refer to Assessment Methodology in Section II, Method of Apportionment) that calculates the proportional special benefit and assessment for each parcel within those Districts. Thus, each parcel is assessed proportionately for only those improvements, services, and expenses for which the parcel receives special benefit.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the Kings County Assessor’s Office. The Kings County Auditor/Controller uses APNs and specific Fund Numbers to identify properties to be assessed on the tax roll for the District assessments.

At a noticed annual Public Hearing, the City Council will accept all public comments and written protests regarding the District s and the annual levy of assessments. Based on those public comments and written protests, the City Council may order amendments to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the Report and confirmation of the assessments, the City Council will by Resolution, order the improvements to be made and confirm the levy and collection of assessments for fiscal year 2024/2025 pursuant to the 1972 Act. The assessment for each parcel as approved will be placed on the fiscal year 2024/2025 property tax roll by the Kings County Auditor/Controller and collected together and in the same manner as other property taxes for such parcels.

As required by the 1972 Act, this Engineer’s Report describes the improvements to be provided, maintained, and serviced by the District s, an estimated budget for the improvements for each District, and the proposed assessments to be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel within those Districts for fiscal year 2024/2025.

Page 556 of 698 ends

Hanford Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Districts
Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Page 3 ends

This Report consists of five (5) parts:

Part I
Plans and Specifications: This section contains a general description of the District s, and the improvements and services that provide special benefits to the parcels within those Districts. The improvements and appurtenant facilities that provide special benefits to the properties within the Districts and for which parcels are assessed may include, but is not limited to local landscaping, neighborhood parks, basins, street lights, and related amenities as well as associated incidental expenses (City Administration expenses and County Fees), and fund balances authorized by the 1972 Act. The plans and specifications contained in this Report generally describe the nature and extent of the improvements . More detailed information regarding the specific plans and specifications associated with the improvements in each District may be on file in the Public Works Department and by reference are made part of this Report.

Part II
Method of Apportionment: This section includes a discussion of the general and special benefits associated with the improvements to be provided within the LLMD (Benefit Analysis), which includes a discussion of the proportional costs of the special benefits and a separation of costs considered to be of general benefit (and therefore not assessed). This section of the Report also outlines the basis upon which the estimated costs to provide such improvements are apportioned to each parcel of land within the Districts in proportion to the special benefits to be received (the method of calculating each property’s proportional special benefit assessment ). This method of apportionment is consistent with the previously approved and adopted method of apportionment for each District.

Part III
Estimate of Costs : Identifies the estimated annual funding costs ( budgets) required for the maintenance and operation of the improvements in each of the Districts, including, but not limited to, annual maintenance and service expenses, utility costs, related incidental expenses, and fund balances authorized by the 1972 Act and deemed appropriate to support the improvements, even though not all costs identified in t hese budgets are necessarily supported fully by the current assessment revenues. Those improvements and/or costs determined to be of general benefit shall be funded by a City contribution. In addition to the general benefit costs, the City may provide additional funding to support the maintenance and operation of the improvements considered to be of special benefit. Ultimately, City staff shall make the determination of which improvements, and the extent of the services and activities that shall be provided based on available revenues.

This section also identifies and outlines an Assessment Range Formula (inflationary adjust) that has been previously approved and adopted for specified Districts (most but not all Districts), which provides for an annual adjustment to the maximum assessment rates, establishing limits on future assessments, but also providing for reasonable cost adjustments due to inflation.

Page 557 of 698 ends

Hanford Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Districts
Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Page 4 ends

Part IV
District Diagrams: This section of the Report contains diagram s showing the general location and boundaries of the Districts for fiscal year 2024/2025 which incorporate the parcels determined to receive special benefits from the improvements within each District. The lines and dimensions of each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land contained in the diagram for each District is inclusive of the parcels listed in “Part V - Assessment Roll” of this Report and the corresponding County Assessor’s parcel maps for said parcels as they existed at the time this Report was prepared and shall incorporate all subsequent subdivisions, lot -line adjustments, or parcel changes therein.

Reference is hereby made to the Kings County Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of each lot and parcel of land within the Districts.

Part V
Assessment Rolls: The assessment amounts to be levied and collected in fiscal year 2024/2025 for each parcel is provided in the Assessment Roll , and these assessments are based on the parcel’s calculated proportional special benefit as outlined in Part II - Method of Apportionment and the annual assessment rates established by the estimated budgets (refer to Part III - Estimate of Costs).

If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, portion, zone, or subzone of this Engineer’s Report is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Engineer’s Report and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, portion, zone, or subzone thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, portions, zones, or subzones might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Page 558 of 698 ends

Hanford Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Districts
Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Page 5 ends

Part I - Plans and Specifications
The purpose of th e Districts (collectively the LLMD) is to provide in part through annual assessments, funding for the ongoing installation, maintenance, operation, and servicing of local landscaping, neighborhood parks, and related appurtenant facilities and services in specified areas of the City as well as local street lighting within some Districts. The territory within each District consists of all lots or parcels of land that receive special benefits from the installation, maintenance, operation and servicing of the local public improvements and related amenities associated with the developments and Tracts within each of those Districts.

Description of Improvements
As authorized by the 1972 Act, the improvements provided by the Districts and associated with each development incorporate various local improvements and/or street lighting and related amenities installed in connection with the development of those properties and are maintained and serviced for the benefit of real property within those developments. Improvements provided within the Districts may include but are not limited to:
➢ Landscaping and related facilities and amenities located within designated street medians, parkway and streetscape side -panels, and entryways within the public right s-of-way or easements adjacent to public right s-of-way; and within public places including greenbelt areas, open spaces, and neighborhood parks within each respective District. These improvements may include, but are not limited to:
• Various landscape materials such as trees, turf, shrubs, vines, ground cover, annual or perineal plantings;
• Irrigation and drainage systems including but not limited to pipes, fixtures, controllers, and water and electrical meters;
• Specified amenities such as monuments, ornamental lighting, block walls, retaining walls, or other fencing;
• Hardscape surfaces and areas including decomposed granite, mulch, asphalt, stamped concrete, pavers, and other trail and/or path surfaces; and • Recreational amenities within the parks , parks/basins, trails, or greenbelts that may include benches, play structures, picnic or other recreational facilities, signage, and related appurtenances.

The maintenance of these improvements may include, but is not limited to the scheduled mowing, trimming, pruning, fertilization, pest control, weed and graffiti abatement; installation, replacement, and rehabilitation of the landscaping ; repair or replacement of irrigation or drainage systems; and repair or replacement of hardscape improvements and recreational amenities.
➢ Street lighting improvements located in the public rights-of-way within and on the perimeter of the developments associated with specific Districts and the parcels and developments therein.

Street lighting improvements include energy costs and maintenance of the lighting facilities including, but not limited to the removal, repair, replacement or relocation of light standards, poles, bulbs, fixtures, and related equipment and materials.

Page 559 of 698 ends

Hanford Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Districts
Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Page 6 ends

The work to be performed within each respective District may include but is not limited to (as applicable), the personnel, materials, equipment, electricity, water, contract services, repair and rehabilitation of the improvements, and incidental expenses. The City Public Works Department shall authorize and schedule such maintenance and servicing as needed and based on available funding.

Specific District Improvements and Services
As previously noted, there are forty -three (43) designated Districts within the City for which assessments are proposed to be levied and collected to maintain, operate and service the improvements within those Districts for fiscal year 2024/2025. The boundaries of each District are established on the basis of the location, extent and types of improvements being maintained and the proximity and direct benefit those specific improvement s provide to the immediately surrounding developments, planned developments, and parcels . In addition, the nexus and observation that the developments and/or planned development of the properties within each District clearly required or otherwise facilitated the installation of the improvements to be maintained and that such improvements (both landscaping and lighting) would otherwise not be necessary if not for the development of those properties. Therefore, the benefit s to the immediately surrounding properties and developments for which the improvements were constructed and installed and/or were facilitated by the development or potential development of properties within each respective District are clearly particular and distinct (special benefits).

Landscape Service Levels
As part of the ongoing maintenance and servicing of the landscape improvements associated with each District, the City has established various maintenance frequency referred to as S ervice Levels. These Service Levels provide general guidelines for how often the landscape improvement areas are serviced based on overall maintenance needs and/or available assessment funding. For most Districts, the various landscape improvements or improvement areas within a District are maintained at the same level of service , but in some Districts two or more Service Levels may be applicable based on the nature and/or location of the improvements.

At present, the City has established five (5) Service Levels summarized as follows:
➢ Service Level A – Landscape improvements are serviced every week; ➢ Service Level B – Landscape improvements are serviced e very week (March through October) and every two weeks (November through February); ➢ Service Level C – Landscape improvements are serviced every two weeks; ➢ Service Level D – Landscape improvements are serviced every two weeks (March through October) and every four weeks (November through February); and ➢ Service Level E – Landscape improvements are serviced once every month.

For Fiscal Year 2024/2025 it is anticipated that each of the improvement areas being maintained within the LLMP will be maintained at either Service Levels A, B, C or D.

Page 560 of 698 ends

Hanford Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Districts
Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Page 7 ends

District Improvements
The following is a brief summary and description of the improvements to be maintained within each District for fiscal year 2024/2025.

District 90-01: Pinecastle Addition Units 1 through 4
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 352 lots) include, but are not lim ited to Tracts 606, 606-2, 606-3, and 606 -4. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 67,750 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service Level A, including the 11,532 square feet associated with the park/basin area.

District 90-02: Park Monterey Units 1 and 2
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 53 lots) include but are not limited to Tracts 610 and 657. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 8,625 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service Level D.

District 90-03: Mansionette Units 7 and 8
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 84 lots) include but are not limited to Tracts 596 and 596-2. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 16,425 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service Level D.

District 90-04: Hyde Park
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 14 lots) include but are not limited to Tract 619. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 1,425 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service Level B.

District 91-01: Sierra Vista and New Dimensions Units 1 through 5 The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 285 lots) include, but are not limited to Tracts 641, 703, 703-2, 713-3, 713-4, and 713-5. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 12,974 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service Level D.

District 92-01: Portofino Unit Units 1 through 4
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 78 lots) include, but are not limited to Tracts 607, 607-2, 607-3, and 607 -4. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 19,167 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service Level D.

Page 561 of 698 ends

Hanford Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Districts
Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Page 8 ends

District 92-02: Cielo en Tierra Units 1 through 5
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 98 lots) include, but are not limited to Tracts 652, 652-2, 652 -3, 652 -4, and 652 -5. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 11,735 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service Level D.

District 93-01: Vintage Estates
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 29 lots) include but are not limited to Tract 634. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 10,346 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service L evel A. The assessments for this District also fund, in whole or in part, the six (6) street lights identified within the District boundaries.

District 93-02: Walnut Forest Units 1 through 3
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 169 lots) include, but are not limited to Tracts 673, 673-2, and 673 -3. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 15,637 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service Level A, including the 3,537 square feet associated with slough frontage.

District 94-01: Gateway Estates
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 114 lots) include but are not limited to Tract 712.

The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 8,185 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service Level D, including the 5,460 square feet associated with the basin area.

District 94-02: Stonecrest Units 1 through 9
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 654 lots) include, but are not limited to Tracts 708, 708-2, 727-3, 727-4, 727-5, 727-6, 727-7, 727-8, and 727 -9. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 173,903 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service Level D for the 51,578 square feet of railroad frontage, Service Level B for 14,765 square feet of the total maintained landscape area, and Service Level A for the remaining 107,560 square feet of landscaping including the 54,450 square feet of basin area.

District 94-03: Quail Run Estates Units 1 through 5
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 272 lots) include, but are not limited to Tracts 696, 696-2, 696 -3, 696 -4, and 696 -5. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 111,188 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service Level B.

Page 562 of 698 ends

Hanford Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Districts
Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Page 9 ends

District 97-01: Rosewood Estates Units 1 and 2
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 44 lots) include but are not limited to Tracts 711 and 711-2. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 6,300 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service Level D.

District 97-02: Summer Field Addition #2
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 30 lots) include but are not limited to Tract 742. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 4,650 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service Level D.

District 97-03: Country Crossing Units 1 through 5
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 251 lots) include, but are not limited to Tracts 743, 743-2, 743 -3, 772 -4, and 772 -5. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 46,415 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service Level A.

District 98-01: Crystal Springs Units 1 through 3
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 126 lots) include, but are not limited to Tracts 747, 747-2, and 747 -3. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 14,435 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service L evel A.

District 98-02: Mountain View Estates Units 1 through 6 The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 162 lots) include, but are not limited to Tracts 759, 759-2, 759-3, 759-4, 759-5, and 759-6. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 30,991 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service Level A.

District 01-01: Pacific Grove Units 1 through 3 and N. Pointe Units 1 through 4 The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 148 lots) include, but are not limited to Tracts 680, 777-2, 778-3, and 778 -4. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 12,152 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service Level A including the 3,530 square feet associated with the basin area.

Page 563 of 698 ends

Hanford Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Districts
Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Page 10 ends

District 01-02: Cambridge Homes Units 1 through 3
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 198 lots) include, but are not limited to Tracts 770, 770-2, and 770 -3. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 35,222 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service L evel D for the 22,790 square feet of railroad frontage and Service Level A for the remaining 12,432 square feet of landscaping.

District 01-03: Poppy Hills Units 1 and 2
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 86 lots) include but are not limited to Tracts 771 and 796-2. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 11,782 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service Level A.

District 01-04: Silver Oaks Units 1 through 5
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 489 lots) include, but are not limited to Tracts 769, 769-2, 769 -3, 769 -4, and 769 -5. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 95,556 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service Level A.

District 02-01: Ashton Park Units 1 through 4
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 182 lots) include, but are not limited to Tracts 776, 776-2, 776-3, and 776 -4. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 63,922 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service Level A.

District 03-01: Le Parc Units 1 through 3
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 128 lots) include, but are not limited to Tracts 788, 788-2, and 788 -3. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 30,628 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service L evel A including the 21,858 square feet associated with the railroad frontage.

District 04-01: Sidonia Units 1 and 2 and Sidonia Estates II The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 233 lots) include but are not limited to Tracts 810 and 810-2. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 21,533 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service Level A.

Page 564 of 698 ends

Hanford Landscaping and Lighting Assessment Districts
Engineer’s Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2024/2025

Page 11 ends

District 04-02: Cambridge Homes/Majesty II, #2
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 75 lots) include but are not limited to Tracts 799 and 830. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 63,824 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service L evel A including the 8,440 square feet associated with the basin area. The assessments for this District also fund in whole or in part, the eleven (11) street lights identified within the District boundaries.

District 04-03: Cambridge Homes - Majesty II - #2, Cambridge Homes Units 1 through 6, Cambridge Homes - Vineyards Units 1 through 4
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 424 lots) include, but are not limited to Tracts 795, 795-2, 799, 825-3, 826-4, 826-5, and 830. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 167,767 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service Level A including the 19,929 square feet associated with the railroad frontage and the 77,548 square feet associ ated with the park area. The assessments for this District also fund in whole or in part, the sixty-three (63) street lights identified within the District boundaries.

District 04-04: Sierra Heights Units 1 and 2
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 16 lots) include but are not limited to Tracts 802 and 803. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 15,237 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service Level A.

District 05-01: Mission Park
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 40 lots) include but are not limited to Tract 812. The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 4,930 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service Le vel A including the 2,537 square feet associated with the basin area.

District 05-02: Copper Valley
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 150 lots) include but are not limited to Tract 835.

The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 44,126 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service Level A.

District 06-01: Quail Park Subdivision
The parcels assessed in this District (totaling 144 lots) include but are not limited to Tract 794.

The properties within this District proportionately share and receive special benefit from the maintenance, servicing, and operation of an estimated 148,501 square feet of designated landscape improvement area. These improvements are maintained at Service Level B for the park area (95,551 square feet) and Service Level D for the 52,950 square feet of railroad frontage.

The assessments for this District also f und, in whole or in part , the twenty-four (24) street lights identified within the District boundaries.

Page 565 of 698 ends

Hanford City CouncilJuly 2, 2024

Hanford City Council
July 2, 2024