Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Hanford City Council
February 4, 2025

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
February 4, 2025
Body
Hanford City Council
Pages
282
Original file
57.9 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on hanfordca.api.civicclerk.com. That file is the official record.

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 99
Appendices

Page 255 of 282 ends

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 100

DESIGN GUIDES
⊲ FHWA Safe Transportation for Every
Pedestrian (STEP)
» Informs pedestrian improvements
⊲ FHWA STEP: Improving Visibility at Trail
Crossings (2021)
» Informs pedestrian and bicycle
improvements at trail crossings
⊲ FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures
» Supplements pedestrian and bicycle
recommendations as needed based on
location
⊲ FHWA Road Diet Informational Guide
» Informs road diet feasibility determination
⊲ FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide (2019)
» Informs facility type recommendation
based on roadway speed, volume, and
urban/rural context.
⊲ FHWA California Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices (CAMUTCD) (2014)
» Amended version of the FHWA MUTCD
2009 edition modified for use in California.

While standards presented in the CA
MUTCD substantially conform to the
FHWA MUTCD, the state of California
follows local practices, laws and
requirements with regards to signing,
striping and other traffic control devices.
⊲ Caltrans 7th Edition Highway Design
Manual (HDM) – Chapter 1000 Bicycle
Transportation Design (2015)
» Informs the design and implementation
of bicycle facilities. References FHWA
Bikeway Selection Guide
⊲ Caltrans Design Information Bulletin Number
94 – Complete Streets Contextual Design
Guidance (2024)
» Informs decision to maximize the use
of the public right of way to achieve
sustainable and equitable mobility
The following section serves as an inventory
of pedestrian and bicycle design treatments
and provides guidelines for their development.

These treatments and design guidelines are
important because they represent the tools
for creating a pedestrian- and bicycle-friendly,
accessible community. The guidelines are not,
however, a substitute for a more thorough
evaluation by a professional engineer before the
implementation of facility improvements.
⊲ The National Association of City
Transportation Officials’ (NACTO) Urban
Bikeway Design Guide (2012) and Urban
Street Design Guide (2013) are collections
of nationally recognized street design
standards, and offers guidance on the
current state of the practice designs.
⊲ U.S. Department of Transportation Federal
Highway Administration: Small Town and
Rural Multimodal Networks
» Addresses challenges to specific rural
areas, recognizes how many rural
roadways are operating today, and
focuses on opportunities to make
incremental improvements despite the
geographic, fiscal, and other challenges
that many rural communities face.
⊲ FHWA Separate Bike Lane Planning and
Design Guide (2015)
» Latest national guidance on the
planning and design of separated bike
lane facilities released by the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA). The
resource documents best practices
as demonstrated around the U.S., and
offers ideas on future areas of research,
evaluation and design flexibility.

Page 256 of 282 ends

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 101
⊲ Caltrans Design Information Bulletin Number
89-02 – Class IV Bikeway Guidance (2022)
» Informs the design and implementation of
Class IV bicycle facilities
⊲ Caltrans Traffic Calming Guide (2023)
» Informs design and implementation of
different traffic calming treatments
⊲ Caltrans Design Flexibility in Multimodal
Design (2014)
» Encourages flexibility in highway design.

The memo stated that “Publications
such as the National Association of City
Transportation Officials (NACTO) “Urban
Street Design Guide” and “Urban Bikeway
Design Guide,”... are resources that
Caltrans and local entities can reference
when making planning and design
decisions on the State highway system
and local streets and roads.”
⊲ Caltrans Complete Intersections: A Guide
to Reconstructing Intersections and
Interchanges for Bicyclists and Pedestrians
(2010)
» Reference guide presents information and
concepts related to improving conditions
for bicyclists and pedestrians at major
intersections and interchanges. The guide
can be used to inform minor signage and
striping changes to intersections, as well
as major changes and designs for new
intersections.
⊲ Main Street, California: A Guide for
Improving Community and Transportation
Vitality (2013)
» Reflects California’s current manuals
and policies that improve multimodal
access, livability and sustainability
within the transportation system. The
guide recognizes the overlapping and
sometimes competing needs of main
streets.
⊲ California Highway Design Manual (HDM)
(Updated 2015)
» Establishes uniform policies and
procedures to carry out highway design
functions for the California Department of
Transportation.

Page 257 of 282 ends

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 102

CONCEPT DESIGNS
Figure 21: People’s Trail Alignment at W Elm St and the Railroad Tracks People’s trail Alignment

Page 258 of 282 ends

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 103
Figure 22: People’s Trail Alignment at the West Lacey Blvd Crossing Tracks

Page 259 of 282 ends

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 104

FUNDING SOURCES
Various sources exist to fund bicycle and
pedestrian infrastructure projects, programs,
and studies. Local and regional funding
sources that can be used for the construction
or maintenance of bicycle or pedestrian
improvements, along with statewide and federal
grant programs, are described on the following
pages. Eligibilities for the funding programs
listed in this section are summarized in Table 11.

Local and regional
Funding Sources
cItY oF HAn Ford
The City of Hanford can implement bicycle and
pedestrian projects in conjunction with other
projects, including pavement resurfacing, new
developments, and frontage development.

Funds for implementing bicycle and pedestrian
projects can also come from a dedication of
a certain dollar amount in the City’s Capital
Improvements Program (CIP).

General Fund
The City can utilize revenues from the General
Fund to build and maintain pedestrian and
bicycle facilities or match State and Federal
Funds.

Developer Fees
The City can implement bicycle and pedestrian
improvements using revenues generated from
developer fees. These improvements should
accommodate the new development.

Developer Agreements
When permitting new developments, the City
can require the developer to implement portions
of bicycle and pedestrian improvements where
the construction becomes part of the new
development.

Other Local Programs
The City can leverage private donations to
develop pedestrian or bicycle facilities through
programs such as “adopt-a-highway” and
memorials.

Page 260 of 282 ends

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 105
regional
California Clean Air Act (CCAA) –
SJVAPCD Remove II Program
Clean Air Funds generated by a surcharge on
automobile registration imposed by authorized
air districts in California to provide funds to
meet responsibilities mandated under the
California Clean Air Act (CCAA). This Program
can assist with developing and expanding a
comprehensive bicycle transportation network.

Congestion Management and Air Quality
(CMAQ) Program
Funds transportation projects and programs that
will contribute to the attainment or maintenance
of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard
for ozone and carbon monoxide by reducing
congestion and improving air quality. The
program will fund the construction of bicycle
and pedestrian facilities and bicycle support
programs such as brochures, maps, and public
service announcements.

Local Transportation Fund (LTF)
Up to two percent of each county’s LTF can
be claimed annually by local jurisdictions to
be used for installing or maintaining bicycle
and pedestrian facilities (Public Utilities Code,
Section 99233.3). This amount would provide
around $90,000 each year for bicycle and
pedestrian projects. The RTPA may also
reserve an amount so designated, up to 2%
of the LTF, each year for later allocation to
claimants for pedestrian and bicycle facilities
or bicycle safety programs. If the RTPA finds
that all or any portion of the amount reserved
could be used more appropriately for other
purposes, that amount can be added to the
total apportionment available the following
year. Generally, local jurisdictions prefer to use
LTF allocations claimed for street and road
purposes for bicycle and pedestrian projects to
minimize administrative costs. The Kings County
Association of Governments could apportion
an amount of LTF to provide a bicycle facilities
maintenance fund. If the funds are not needed
for bicycle facility maintenance, the funds
can be returned to the following fiscal year’s
estimated LTF for reapportionment.

REAP 2.0
The California Department of Housing and
Community Development (HCD), in collaboration
with the Governor’s Office of Planning and
Research, the Strategic Growth Council, and
the California Air Resources Board, established
the Regional Early Action Planning (REAP) 2.0
program. The purpose of REAP 2.0 is to support
transformative planning and implementation
activities such as accelerating infill and
affordable housing development, reducing
vehicle miles traveled, and increasing transit
ridership, walking, and biking as primary modes
of transportation. The Kings County Association
of Governments (KCGA) was awarded
$2,060,590 in REAP 2.0 for eligible activities.

KCAG submitted an Advance Application for
$206,059 to fund the administration of grant
funds, development of the REAP 2.0 program,
public education and stakeholder outreach,
and preparation of the Full Application for the
remainder of the funds. KCAG submitted a Full
Application for $1,854,531. The proposed use of
the funds will be sub-allocated to local agencies
for eligible activities.

Page 261 of 282 ends

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 106
State Funding Sources
ActIVE tr AnSPortAtIon
ProGrAM
The Active Transportation Program (ATP)
was created to encourage the use of active
transportation through encouragement
and safety measures. Eligible projects
include infrastructure projects, education,
encouragement, and enforcement of non-
infrastructure projects that further the goals
of the ATP, a combination of infrastructure
and non-infrastructure activities, and the
development of active transportation plans
in disadvantaged communities. Senate Bill 1
(SB 1) stipulates that $100 million of revenues
from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation
Account will be available annually to the ATP.

The ATP consolidates existing federal and
state transportation programs, including the
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP),
Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA), and State
Safe Routes to School (SRTS), into a single
program with a focus on making California
a national leader in active transportation.

Applications are typically submitted in July.

Typical projects funded by the ATP include Safe
Routes to School programming, Safe Routes to
Transit programming, New or improved bicycle
infrastructure, including bike lanes and bike
parking, New or improved pedestrian facilities,
including sidewalks and crosswalks, and
Network links to trails and parks.

The goals of the ATP are to Increase the
proportion of walking and biking trips, Increase
safety and mobility for non-motorized users,
Reduce greenhouse gas emissions, Enhance
public health, and Ensure disadvantaged
communities share the program’s benefits.
cALtrAnS SuStAInABLE
trAnSPortAtIon
PLAnn InG GrAntS
The Sustainable Transportation Planning
Grant Program supports transportation
planning processes that address local and
regional transportation needs and issues. The
program offers two types of grants: Strategic
Partnerships and Sustainable Communities.

The Sustainable Communities Grants has
$29.5 million in funding to encourage local
and regional planning that furthers state
greenhouse gas emission reduction goals. The
Strategic Partnership Grant has $4.5 million
to identify and address statewide or regional
deficiencies on the State highway system in
partnership with Caltrans. The overarching
objectives to guide grant applications are
sustainability, preservation, accessibility, safety,
innovation, economy, health, and social equity.

Past awarded project types include active
transportation, complete streets, and transit.

Page 262 of 282 ends

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 107
cALIF ornIA I nFrAStructur E
And EconoMI c
dEVEL oPME nt BAn K
The California Infrastructure and Economic
Development Bank (IBank) was created in 1994
to finance public infrastructure and private
development that promotes a healthy climate
for jobs, contributes to a strong economy,
and improves the quality of life in Californian
communities. IBank has broad authority to
issue tax-exempt and taxable revenue bonds,
provide financing to public agencies, provide
credit enhancements, acquire or lease facilities,
and leverage State and Federal funds. IBank’s
current programs include the Infrastructure
State Revolving Fund (ISRF) Loan Program, the
Expanding Venture Capital Access Program,
the Climate Catalyst Revolving Loan Fund, the
Small Business Finance Center, and the Bond
Financing Program.
cALIF ornIA o FFIcE oF tr AFFIc
SAFE tY
The California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS)
provides grants to local and state agencies for
improving roadway safety for all users. Through
grant funding made available to California by the
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA), the OTS funds more than $100 million
dollars annually in innovative, evidence-based
education and enforcement programs and
technologies designed to improve road safety.

The OTS has grant programs that fund projects
that protect bicyclist and pedestrian safety
raise awareness about traffic rules, and provide
training and programs for high-risk communities
like children and older adults.
cALIF ornIA tr AnSPortAtIon
coMMISSI on LocAL
PArtnErSHIP Pro GrAM (LPP)
This program provides $200 million in
funding for local and regional transportation
agencies with voter-approved taxes, tolls,
or fees dedicated solely to transportation
improvements. The program funds aging
infrastructure, road conditions, active
transportation, transit and rail, and health and
safety benefits. The LPP funds are distributed
through a 40% statewide competitive
component and a 60% formulaic component.
cLEAn MoBILI tY oPt IonS
Administered by the California Air Resources
Board, the Clean Mobility Options grant
funds projects like bike share, scooter share,
car share, electric vehicle charging stations,
infrastructure for clean mobility, and community
transportation needs assessments. Funds are
available for disadvantaged communities in the
state.

GAS tAX
Funds from the State gas tax are based on the
historical apportionments provided to Kings
County jurisdictions. The passage of Senate
Bill 1, which aims to generate an estimated $52
billion more money by increasing gasoline tax
and imposing new transportation improvement
fee to help repair and maintain the state’s
transportation system for the next decade,
allows a significant increase in funding for
bicycle and pedestrian improvement programs.

Page 263 of 282 ends

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 108
LAnd A nd WAtEr
conSErVAtIon Fund
ProGrAM
Provides grants to plan, acquire, and develop
recreation parks and facilities, including
bikeways and pedestrian trails. The California
Department of Parks and Recreation provides
reimbursement grant funds of 50% of the total
project costs.

MELL o-rooS co MMunItY
FAcILItIES d IStrIct A ct o F
1982
Allows the sponsoring agency to issue a special
tax bond for a community facilities district to
finance public facilities and services such as
parks, recreation areas, parkways, and open
space. Bicycle and pedestrian projects could be
included in any proposed public facility.

StAtE HIGHWAY oPE rAtIon
And ProtEctIon ProGrAM
(SHo PP)
The SHOPP program is designed to maintain
the state highway system; however, it includes
opportunities to address Complete Streets
elements and improve pedestrian and bicycle
facilities. Program funds can be used for
projects with Complete Streets components
like signage, bike parking, bike lanes,
pedestrian crossing infrastructure, transit
stop improvements, and pedestrian lighting.

Funds can also be used for projects that have
climate action efforts and provide low-emission
transportation choices. SHOPP projects are
administered by Caltrans and the California
Transportation Commission.

StAtE oF cALIF ornIA I nFILL
InFrAStructur E GrAnt
ProGrAM (IIG)
The objective of the IIG program is to promote
infill housing development by providing financial
assistance for Capital Improvement Projects that
are an integral part of, or necessary to facilitate,
the development of affordable and mixed-income
housing. Eligible costs include, but are not limited
to, the creation, development, or rehabilitation
of Parks or Open Spaces; water, sewer or other
utility service improvements (including internet
and electric vehicle infrastructure); streets;
roads; Transit Station Structured Parking; transit
linkages or facilities; facilities that support
pedestrian or bicycle transit; traffic mitigation,
sidewalk, or streetscape improvements; Factory-
Built Housing components; Adaptive Reuse; and
site preparation or demolition.

StAtE tr AnSPortAtIon
IMProVEME nt ProGrAM (S tIP)
The capital improvement program is funded
by state and federal monies. Available funding
is divided into two programs: the Interregional
Transportation Improvement Plan (ITIP) and the
Regional Transportation Improvement Plan (RTIP).
trAnSForMAtIVE cLIMA tE
coMMunItIES ( tcc)
The California Strategic Growth Council funds
community-led development and infrastructure
projects that achieve major environmental,
health, and economic benefits in California’s
most disadvantaged communities. In addition to
reducing greenhouse gas emissions, the goals
of the TCC program are to fund projects that
maximize community health and environmental
benefits, avoid displacement, have
comprehensive community involvement, and
offer technical assistance. Previous rounds have
had $115 million available for implementation and
planning projects.

Page 264 of 282 ends

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 109
trAnSPortAtIon
dEVEL oPME nt Act FundS
(tdA)
TDA provides funding from State Transit
Assistance (STA) and Local Transportation
Fund (LTF). This program funds a variety
of transportation programs, including for
pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit facilities.

The amount of funding is based on sales
tax collected in each county. This fund is
administered by Caltrans.
urBAn GrEEnInG GrAnt
ProGrAM
The Urban Greening Program, funded by the
General Fund, is a grant program designed to
promote a comprehensive, long-term approach
to addressing climate change to improve the
environment. Specifically, the program funds
urban greening and urban forestry projects that
reduce GHG emissions and provide additional
benefits. A competitive project will maximize
opportunities to reduce GHG emissions
through project design and implementation
and incorporate green infrastructure solutions
that improve the sustainability and function of
existing urban hardscapes and landscapes.

Federal Funding Sources
ActIVE tr AnSPortAtIon
InFrAStructur E InVEStMEnt
ProGrAM (A tIIP)
ATIIP will provide competitive grants for projects
that connect active transportation networks
and spines. Eligible projects should create
an active transportation network connecting
destinations, including schools, workplaces,
residences, businesses, recreation areas, and
other community areas, or create an active
transportation spine connecting two or more
communities. The project should also integrate
active transportation facilities with transit
services. Funding was approved in December
2022, and USDOT has not yet released
information on the application timeline or
criteria.

AFFordABLE H ouSInG And
SuStAInABLE co MMunItIES
ProGrAM (AHS c)
The goals of AHSC are to support compact
development to preserve land, reduce
greenhouse gas emissions, and increase the
supply of affordable housing near jobs, stores,
transit, and other key destinations. Eligible
projects include sustainable transportation
infrastructure, such as new transit vehicles,
sidewalks, and bike lanes; transportation-related
amenities, such as bus shelters, benches, or
shade trees; and other programs encouraging
residents to walk, bike, and use public transit.
cArBon rEduct Ion ProGrAM
Authorized with the BIL in 2022, the Carbon
Reduction Program is a DOT program that
funds projects that support a reduction in
transportation emissions. Eligible projects
include bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure
and public transit facilities. Caltrans distributes
funding based on population sizes using the
2020 Census.

Page 265 of 282 ends

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 110
EnHAncEd MoBILI tY oF
SEnIorS And I ndIVIduALS
WItH dISABILI tIES
This program is intended to enhance mobility
for seniors and persons with disabilities by
providing funds for programs to serve the
special needs of transit-dependent populations
beyond traditional public transportation
services and the Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA) complementary paratransit services.

The program will fund bicycle improvements
that provide access to an eligible public
transportation facility and meet the needs of the
elderly and individuals with disabilities, which
receive an 80% federal share.

HIGHWAY SAFE tY
IMPro VEME nt Pro GrAM
Funds infrastructure projects aimed at reducing
traffic fatalities and serious injuries. Projects
may include intersection improvements,
pavement, and shoulder widening, rumble
strips, skid-restraint surfaces, bike/ped safety
improvements, and traffic calming.

HouSE tr AnSPortAtIon
& InFrAStructur E (t&I)
coMMI ttEE APP roPrIAtIonS
The House T&I Committee invites Members
of Congress to request funding for projects in
their communities. Project funds can be used for
planning, final design, and construction projects.

Eligible projects include bicycle & pedestrian
infrastructure projects that increase access,
strengthen multimodal connections, reduce
greenhouse gas emissions, and enhance
environmental justice.

InFrAStructur E InVEStMEnt
And jo BS A ct
The current federal transportation infrastructure
bill aims to rebuild the nation’s deteriorating
roads and bridges and fund new climate
resilience, such as repairing and replacing aging
public works projects, moving communities
vulnerable to climate change, reconnecting
communities divided by highway construction,
and providing safe commutes for pedestrians. At
least $25 million annually is reserved for “small
and disadvantaged communities.”
MEtroPoLItAn, StAtEWI dE &
non -ME troP oLItAn PLA nnInG
This federal source provides funding for
multimodal transportation planning in
metropolitan areas. Funds can be used for
planning activities that support the economic
vitality of a metropolitan area, increase the
safety and security of transportation systems,
increase mobility, protect the environment, or
connect transportation systems.
nAtIonAL E ndoWME nt For
tHE A rtS – G rAntS For A rt
ProjEctS
Grants for Arts Projects (GAP) provides
expansive funding opportunities to strengthen
the nation’s arts and culture ecosystem.

Through project-based funding, the program
supports opportunities for public engagement
with the arts and arts education, the integration
of the arts with strategies promoting the health
and well-being of people and communities,
and the improvement of overall capacity and
capabilities within the arts sector. This funding
source could be used for incorporating public
art into a streetscape redesign or adding
thoughtful art elements that represent the local
community.

Page 266 of 282 ends

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 111
nEIGHB orHood AccESS And
EQuItY GrAntS
Authorized by the Inflation Reduction Act
in August 2022, these grants aim to make
roads safer for all modes of transportation.

The purpose of the grant is to reconnect
communities that have highways running
through them. Funds can be used to redesign
highways for all modes, build trails and bike
lanes, provide transit connections, install green
infrastructure, reduce urban heat islands, and
build safety features.

PILot P roGrAM F or tr AnSIt-
orIE ntEd dEVEL oPME nt
PLA nnI nG
This program aims to improve America’s public
transportation system by providing funds to
integrate land use and transportation planning.

Funding is available for projects that improve
multimodal transportation, accessibility, and
pedestrian and bicycle access to transit and
enable mixed-use development near transit.
rEBuILd AME rIcAn
InFrAStructur E WI tH
SuStAInABILI tY And EQuItY
RAISE grants are for capital investments in
surface transportation infrastructure for projects
with a significant local or regional impact.

RAISE grants are awarded on a competitive
basis, based on criteria related to safety,
environmental sustainability, quality of life,
mobility and community connectivity, economic
competitiveness and opportunity, state of good
repair, partnership and collaboration,
and innovation.
rEcrEAtIon trAILS P roGrAM
A federal assistance program administered
by the U.S. Department of Transportation’s
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). It
provides funds to states for the acquisition of
Right-of-Way, development and maintenance of
recreational trails, trial-related facilities for both
motorized and nonmotorized recreational trail
uses, and education programs. The program
is part of the National Trails System, which
includes National Recreation Trails, National
Scenic Trails, and National Historic Trails.
rAISE G rAntS
Previously known as the BUILD and TIGER
grant, the RAISE grant funds the building and
repair of transportation networks. Available
through the U.S. Department of Transportation,
the RAISE grant allows sponsors at the State
and local levels to obtain funding for multi-
modal, multi-jurisdictional projects that are
more difficult to support through traditional
funding initiatives.
rEVISE S urFAcE
trAnSPortAtIon ProGrAM
Funds bicycle facilities and pedestrian walkways
and modification of public sidewalks to comply
with ADA standards.

SAFE S trEEtS And roAdS
For ALL
Established by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law
(BIL), this program funds initiatives that prevent
roadway deaths and serious injuries and can be
used to carry out items in support of creating
safety Action Plans like Vision Zero, and in
implementing infrastructure, including installing
pedestrian and bicycle networks, transforming
roadway corridors into Complete Streets, and
improving the safety of intersections. Up to $1
billion is available each year of the program.

Page 267 of 282 ends

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 112
SurFAcE tr AnSPortAtIon
BLocK G rAntS
Extended by the Bipartisan Infrastructure
Law, these grants are used to fund projects
that maintain and improve the transportation
performance of federal-aid highways, bridges,
and tunnels, install pedestrian and bicycle
infrastructure and implement transit capital
projects. Additional Transportation Alternatives
set aside funds for active transportation,
and active transportation access to transit
improvements.
tHrIVI nG coMM unItIES
ProGrAM ( tcP)
The TCP provides technical assistance to
disadvantaged communities adversely or
disproportionately affected by environmental,
climate, and human health policy outcomes,
including technical tools and organizational
capacity to compete for federal aid and deliver
quality infrastructure projects that enable their
communities and neighborhoods to thrive. A
community organization must be the primary
applicant.
trAnSPortAtIon
ALtErnAtIVES
The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law continues
the Transportation Alternatives set aside
from the Surface Transportation Block Grant
(STBG) program. Eligible uses of the set-aside
funds include projects and activities that were
previously eligible under the Transportation
Alternatives Program under the Moving
Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act.

This encompasses a variety of smaller-scale
transportation projects such as pedestrian and
bicycle facilities, recreational trails, safe routes
to school projects, community improvements
such as historic preservation and vegetation
management, and environmental mitigation
related to stormwater and habitat connectivity.

Page 268 of 282 ends

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 113
Table 11: Funding Opportunities Matrix
Funding Source
Planning/
Design/
Construction
On-Street
Bikeways/
End-of-Trip Trails
Safe
Routes
to
School
Safe
Routes
to
Transit
Crossings/
Intersections Programs Studies
Local and Regional
City of Hanford
General Fund P/D/C ● ● ● ● ● ●
Developers
Fees C ● ● ● ●
Developer
Agreements C ● ● ● ●
Other Local
Programs C ● ● ●
Regional
California
Clean Air Act
– SJVAPCD
Remove II
Program
P/D/C ● ● ● ● ●
Congestion
Management
and Air Quality
Program
C ● ● ● ● ●
Local
Transportation
Fund
C ● ●
REAP 2.0 C ● ● ●
State
Active
Transportation
Program
P/D/C ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
Caltrans
Sustainable
Planning Grants
P ●
California
Infrastructure
and Economic
Development
Bank
P/D/C ● ● ● ●
California Office
of Traffic Safety - ●

Page 269 of 282 ends

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 114
Funding Source
Planning/
Design/
Construction
On-Street
Bikeways/
End-of-Trip Trails
Safe
Routes
to
School
Safe
Routes
to
Transit
Crossings/
Intersections Programs Studies
California
Transportation
Commission
Local
Partnership
Program
C ● ● ● ● ●
Clean Mobility
Options - ● ●
Gas Tax P/D/C ● ● ●
Land and Water
Conservation
Fund Program
C ●
Mello-Roos
Community
Facilities District
Act of 1982
P/C ● ● ●
State Highway
Operation and
Protection
Program
D/C ● ● ●
State of
California Infill
Infrastructure
Grant Program
D/C ● ● ●
State
Transportation
Improvement
Program
P/D/C ● ● ● ● ●
Transformative
Development
Act Funds
P ● ● ● ● ● ●
Urban Greening
Grant Program C ● ● ● ●
Federal
Active
Transportation
Infrastructure
Investment
Program
C ● ● ● ● ●

Page 270 of 282 ends

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 115
Funding Source
Planning/
Design/
Construction
On-Street
Bikeways/
End-of-Trip Trails
Safe
Routes
to
School
Safe
Routes
to
Transit
Crossings/
Intersections Programs Studies
Affordable
Housing and
Sustainable
Communities
Program
C ● ● ●
Carbon
Reduction
Program
C ● ● ● ● ●
Enhanced
Mobility of
Seniors and
Individuals with
Disabilities
D/C ● ● ● ●
Highway Safety
Improvement
Program
C ● ●
House
Transportation
& Infrastructure
Committee
Appropriations
P/D/C ● ● ● ● ●
Infrastructure
Investment and
Jobs Act
D/C ● ● ● ● ●
Metropolitan,
Statewide
& Non-
Metropolitan
Planning
- ● ●
National
Endowment for
the Arts – Grant
for Art Projects
- ● ●
Neighborhood
Access and
Equity Grants
D/C ● ● ● ● ●
Pilot Program
for Transit-
Oriented
Development
Planning
P/D/C ● ● ● ●

Page 271 of 282 ends

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 116
Funding Source
Planning/
Design/
Construction
On-Street
Bikeways/
End-of-Trip Trails
Safe
Routes
to
School
Safe
Routes
to
Transit
Crossings/
Intersections Programs Studies
Rebuilding
American
Infrastructure
with
Sustainability
and Equity
D/C ● ● ●
Recreation
Trails Program C ●
RAISE Grant P/D/C ● ● ● ● ● ●
Revise Surface
Transportation
Program
D/C ● ● ●
Safe Streets and
Roads for All D/C ● ● ● ●
Surface
Transportation
Block Grants
C ● ● ● ● ●
Thriving
Communities
Program
- ● ●
Transportation
Alternatives D/C ● ● ● ● ●

Page 272 of 282 ends

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 117

BICYCLE RECOMMENDATIONS
Table 12: Bicycle Recommendations
Street Name From Street To Street Class
Length
(mi) Tier
Cost Estimate
(Low)
Cost Esti-
mate (High)
10th Ave Hwy 43 Houston Ave IIB 5.0 2 $971,100 $3,082,620 11 1/2 Ave Davis St State St IIIB 0.9 2 $372,000 $651,000 11th Ave Flint Ave Houston Ave IIB 5.1 2 $986,700 $3,132,140 12th Ave Flint Ave Houston Ave IIB 5.1 2/3 $986,700 $3,132,140 13th Ave Fargo Ave Front St IIB 2.7 2 $522,600 $1,658,920 2nd St Phillips St 10th Ave IIB 0.7 2 $134,550 $427,110 6th St 11th Ave 10th Ave IIB 1.0 2 $200,850 $637,570
7th St Mall Dr Williams St II 0.8 2 $ 94,400 $495,200
7th St Williams St Lacey Blvd IV 1.0 3 $400,000 $1,750,000 8 1/2 Ave Leland Florinda IV 1.0 2 $400,000 $1,750,000
8th St Santa Fe Ave Phillips St IIIB 0.1 1 $ 24,000 $42,000 9 1/4 Ave Leland Way Lacey Blvd IIIB 1.5 2 $604,000 $1,057,000 9th Ave Leland Lacey Blvd IIB 2.0 2 $393,900 $1,250,380 9th St Douty St 10th Ave IIIB 0.5 2 $200,000 $350,000
Alpine Ave Hume Ave Houston Ave IIB 0.5 2 $99,450 $315,690 Aspen St W Pepper Dr Fargo Ave II 0.3 2 $35,400 $185,700 Berkshire Way/
Kings Rd Fitzgerald Ln Grangeville Blvd IIIB 0.3 2 $116,000 $203,000 Cameron St 11th St 10th Ave IIIB 1.0 2 $404,000 $707,000 Campus Dr Lacey Blvd Railroad Tracks IV 0.4 1 $164,000 $717,500 Centennial Dr Lacey Blvd 12th Ave I 0.6 2 $615,000 $879,000 Centennial Dr Lacey Blvd Fargo Ave IIB 2.0 2 $390,000 $1,238,000 China Alley Phillips St White St I 0.5 1 $553,500 $791,100 Court St Irwin St Douty St I 0.1 2 $92,250 $131,850
Courtner St Glacier Way Douty St IIIB 0.9 2 $360,000 $630,000 Davis St People's Trail 11th Ave IIIB 1.0 2 $400,000 $700,000 Devon St 13th Ave Centennial Dr IIB 0.5 2 $ 97,500 $309,500 Douty St Flint Hanford Armona IIB 4.1 1 $793,650 $2,519,330 E Lacey Blvd 10th Ave Light Rail Station IV 2.5 3 $1,004,000 $4,392,500 Elm St Greenfield Ave 11th Ave IV 0.1 2 $ 52,000 $227,500 Encore Dr Aspen St Fargo Ave IIIB 1.3 2 $508,000 $889,000

Page 273 of 282 ends

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 118
Street Name From Street To Street Class
Length
(mi) Tier
Cost Estimate
(Low)
Cost Esti-
mate (High)
Fargo Ave 13th Hwy 43 IIB 3.0 2 $575,250 $1,826,050
Fitzgerald Ln Fargo Ave Grangeville Blvd II 1.0 2 $120,360 $631,380 Flint Ave 12th Ave Hwy 43 IIB 2.0 2 $390,000 $1,238,000 Flood Channel
from Flint Ave
to Rodgers
Road (People’s
Trail)
Flint Rodgers I 2.6 1 $2,665,000 $3,809,000
Flood Channel
from RR to
Hume Ave
(People’s Trail)
Railroad Hume I 1.4 1 $1,404,250 $2,007,050
Flood
Control From
Greenfield to
Lacey Blvd
(People’s Trail)
Greenfield Lacey I 0.5 1 $522,750 $747,150
Florinda St 8 1/2 Ave High Speed Rail
Station I 1.0 3 $1,025,000 $1,465,000
Florinda St 11th Ave 10th Ave II 1.0 1 $118,000 $619,000 Florinda St 9 1/4 Ave 8 1/2 Ave III 0.8 3 $ 88,000 $164,000 Florinda St 10th Ave 9 1/4 Ave IIB 0.8 1 $146,250 $464,250 Garner Ave Seventh Lacey II 0.3 2 $ 36,580 $191,890
Glacier Way Flint Ave Courtner St II 1.4 2 $162,840 $854,220 Grangeville
Blvd 9th Ave 7th Ave IV 1.0 2 $400,000 $1,750,000
Grangeville
Blvd 13th Ave 9th Ave IIB 4.0 2 $780,000 $2,476,000
Green St China Alley China Alley IIIB 0.0 1 $4,000 $ 7,000 Greenfield Centennial Lacey Blvd IIB 1.8 1 $349,050 $1,108,010 Hanford
Armona 13th 10th Ave IIB 3.0 1 $585,000 $1,857,000
Harris St 2nd St Hanford Armona IIIB 0.6 2 $228,000 $399,000 Houston Ave 12th Ave 10th Ave IIB 4.5 3 $877,500 $2,785,500 Hume Ave 12th Ave 11th Ave IIB 1.0 2 $195,000 $619,000
Irwin St W Lacey Blvd Civic Center
Park IIIB 0.0 2 $12,000 $ 21,000
Ivy St 11th Ave 10th Ave IIIB 1.0 2 $404,000 $707,000

Page 274 of 282 ends

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 119
Street Name From Street To Street Class
Length
(mi) Tier
Cost Estimate
(Low)
Cost Esti-
mate (High)
Kensington
Way Fargo Ave Grangeville Blvd IIIB 1.0 2 $400,000 $700,000 Kings County
Dr 12th Ave Lacey Blvd II 0.5 2 $ 60,180 $315,690
Leland Way 9 1/4 Ave 8 1/2 Ave IV 0.8 2 $320,000 $1,400,000 Leland Way Douty St 9 1/4 Ave IIIB 1.2 2 $480,000 $840,000 Leoni Dr Cortner St Grangeville Blvd IIIB 0.6 2 $248,000 $434,000 Liberty St Centennial Dr 12th Ave IIB 0.3 2 $ 62,400 $198,080 Mall Dr Lacey Blvd 12th Ave II 0.5 2 $ 62,540 $328,070
McCreary Ave 11th Ave Douty St IIIB 0.5 2 $204,000 $357,000 Muscat Pl 12th Ave Fitzgerald Ln IIIB 0.2 2 $ 96,000 $168,000 Neill Way Fargo Ave Leland Way IIIB 0.5 2 $204,000 $357,000 Pepper Dr Aspen St Glavier Way II 0.7 2 $ 82,600 $433,300 Phillips St Fourth St 2nd St II 0.2 2 $ 23,600 $123,800 Phillips St Lacey Blvd Fourth St IIB 0.4 2 $ 68,250 $216,650 Railroad Tracks Western City
Limit Light Rail Station I 5.7 3 $5,791,250 $8,277,250
Redington 6th St Dewey II 0.3 2 $ 33,040 $173,320
Rodgers Rd Dead End north Cortner St I 0.1 2 $102,500 $146,500 Rodgers Rd Grangeville Blvd Dead End north III 0.5 2 $ 55,000 $102,500 Rodgers Rd 11th Ave Grangeville Blvd IIB 0.6 2 $117,000 $371,400 Sangiovese St Centennial Dr 12th Ave IIB 0.5 2 $ 97,500 $309,500 State St/
Kimball St/
Echo Ln/
Bonnyview Ln
11th 1/2 Ave 11th Ave IIIB 1.0 2 $392,000 $686,000
University Ave Grangeville Blvd Greenfield IIB 0.5 2 $ 89,700 $284,740 W Lacey Blvd Irwin St 13th Ave II 2.4 3 $284,380 $1,491,790 White St China Alley 7th St IIIB 0.0 1 $8,000 $14,000

Page 275 of 282 ends

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 120

PEDESTRIAN RECOMMENDATIONS
Table 13: Pedestrian Recommendations
Recommended Improvements
Crossing Improvements Signs and Signals
Location
Curb Extensions
High Visibility Crosswalk Marking
Advance Yield/Stop Lines
Raised Crossing
Pedestrian Refuge Island
Pedestrian-Scale Lighting
All-Way Stop/ Warrant Analysis
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB)
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon/HAWK
Leading Pedestrian SignalTier
Cost
Estimate
(Low)
Cost
Estimate
(High)
W Cortner St/
N 11th Ave ● ● ● 3 $203,000 $344,000
Grangeville
Blvd/N 11th Ave ● ● ● ● 3 $303,000 $484,000
Centennial Dr/
Grangeville Blvd ● ● 3 $23,000 $44,000
E Grangeville
Blvd/N Douty St ● ● ● 1 $123,000 $184,000
E Grangeville
Blvd/
N Kensington Way
●
1 $5,000 $10,000
E Grangeville
Blvd/10th Ave ● ● 1 $23,000 $44,000
Hill St/Harris St ● 1 $5,000 $8,500
Greenfield Ave/
Cerritos Ave ● ● ● 3 $41,000 $70,000
Greenfield Ave/
Campus Dr ● ● 3 $200,000 $334,000
Florida St/
Whitmore St ● ● 1 $6,500 $15,000
Cameron St/
N 10th Ave ● ● ● 1 $50,000 $117,000
Douty St/Elm St ● ● ● 3 $46,000 $78,500

Page 276 of 282 ends

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 121
Recommended Improvements
Crossing Improvements Signs and Signals
Location
Curb Extensions
High Visibility Crosswalk Marking
Advance Yield/Stop Lines
Raised Crossing
Pedestrian Refuge Island
Pedestrian-Scale Lighting
All-Way Stop/ Warrant Analysis
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB)
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon/HAWK
Leading Pedestrian SignalTier
Cost
Estimate
(Low)
Cost
Estimate
(High)
Ivy St/Park Ave ● ● ● 3 $27,000 $50,000
N 11th Ave/Ivy St ● ● ● ● ● 1 $78,500 $161,500
E 10th St/
N Harris St ● ● ● 3 $195,000 $327,000
N Douty St/
Court St ● ● 1 $31,000 $53,000
N Douty St/
E 8th St ● ● 1 $35,000 $64,000
N Lacey Blvd/
N 10th St ● ● ● 1 $203,000 $344,000
N Douty St/
China Alley ● 1 $1,000 $3,000
Lacey Blvd/
11th Ave ● ● ● ● ● ● 1 $323,500 $585,500
W Lacey Blvd/
Greenfield Ave ● ● ● 3 $155,000 $292,000
W Lacey Blvd/
Campus Dr
(People's Trail)
● ● ●
1 $408,000 $816,500
7th St/Douty St ● ● 2 $22,000 $40,000
W Lacey Blvd/
Centennial Dr ● ● ● 3 $116,000 $204,000
Centennial Dr/
Shopping Mall
Entrance
● ● ●
3 $220,000 $434,000

Page 277 of 282 ends

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 122
Recommended Improvements
Crossing Improvements Signs and Signals
Location
Curb Extensions
High Visibility Crosswalk Marking
Advance Yield/Stop Lines
Raised Crossing
Pedestrian Refuge Island
Pedestrian-Scale Lighting
All-Way Stop/ Warrant Analysis
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB)
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon/HAWK
Leading Pedestrian SignalTier
Cost
Estimate
(Low)
Cost
Estimate
(High)
Mall Dr/
Adventists
Hospital Entrance
●
3 $5,000 $8,500
7th Ave/
Santa Fe Ave ● ● ● 1 $45,000 $68,500
7th St/11th Ave ● ● ● 1 $206,000 $354,000
6th St/11th Ave ● ● 1 $60,000 $87,000
6th St/Douty St ● 2 $20,000 $34,000
5th St/Irwin St ● 2 $5,000 $8,500
5th St/
Redington St ● 2 $10,000 $17,000
5th St/11th Ave ● ● ● 1 $193,000 $327,000
4th St/11th Ave ● ● ● 2 $31,500 $55,000
4th St/11th Ave ● ● ● 1 $116,500 $170,000
3rd St/11th Ave ● ● ● 1 $116,500 $170,000
Harris St/
Between Coe
Park and Ball
Park
●
1 $7,500 $15,000
Douty St/
Longfield Center ● ● ● ● ● 1 $121,000 $236,500
Davis St/ 11th Ave ● ● ● ● ● 1 $305,000 $490,000
Davis St/Grant St ● ● 1 $145,000 $242,000
Scott St/
S Phillips St ● ● 1 $15,000 $27,000

Page 278 of 282 ends

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 123
Recommended Improvements
Crossing Improvements Signs and Signals
Location
Curb Extensions
High Visibility Crosswalk Marking
Advance Yield/Stop Lines
Raised Crossing
Pedestrian Refuge Island
Pedestrian-Scale Lighting
All-Way Stop/ Warrant Analysis
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB)
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon/HAWK
Leading Pedestrian SignalTier
Cost
Estimate
(Low)
Cost
Estimate
(High)
Harris St/Lincoln
Elementary ● ● ● ● 1 $103,000 $175,000
Hanford Armona
Rd/Hanford
Soccer Complex
● ● ● ●
3 $31,000 $86,500
Hanford Armona
Rd/S Harris St ● ● ● ● 1 $145,500 $230,000
Hanford Armona
Rd/11th Ave ● ● ● ● ● ● 1 $335,000 $640,000
Hanford
Armona Rd/
Bengston Ave
● ● ● ●
1 $126,000 $191,500
12th St/Hanford
Armona Rd ● ● ● ● ● 1 $305,000 $490,000
12th St/Graham St ● 1 $5,000 $8,500
Hanford Armona
Rd/Casa Del Sol
Apartments
● ● ●
2 $30,000 $83,500
Dawn Ln/Martin
Luther King
Elementary
● ● ●
1 $13,500 $26,500
Dawn Ln/
Hume Ave ● ● 1 $187,500 $315,000
Dawn Ln/11th Ave ● ● ● ● 1 $223,000 $444,000
1st Pl/Home Ave ● 3 $10,000 $17,000
2nd Pl/Home Ave ● 3 $10,000 $17,000
3rd Pl/Home Ave ● 3 $10,000 $17,000

Page 279 of 282 ends

APPE nd IcES
HANFORD, CALIFORNIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 124
Recommended Improvements
Crossing Improvements Signs and Signals
Location
Curb Extensions
High Visibility Crosswalk Marking
Advance Yield/Stop Lines
Raised Crossing
Pedestrian Refuge Island
Pedestrian-Scale Lighting
All-Way Stop/ Warrant Analysis
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB)
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon/HAWK
Leading Pedestrian SignalTier
Cost
Estimate
(Low)
Cost
Estimate
(High)
1st Pl/Garden Dr ● 3 $10,000 $17,000
2nd Pl/Garden Dr ● 3 $10,000 $17,000
3rd Pl/Garden Dr ● ● 3 $15,000 $27,000
Temple Dr/
Shawn Pl ● 3 $5,000 $8,500

Page 280 of 282 ends
Page 281 of 282 ends

Council Future Agenda Items
Originated
Date Item Originator Staff Lead Date Estimate
10/1/2024 Presentation to the City Council of a
comprehensive needs analysis of the
City’s Historic Buildings and options for
future uses and possible funding
mechanisms
Council
Direction
Various Staff 4/1/2025
11/19/2024 Update to the City Council regarding
initial planning of the Civic Auditorium
Anniversary ceremony.

Council
Direction
Brad Albert 2/18/2025
12/3/2024 Presentation to the City Council
regarding City resources used to
address homelessness in the City of
Hanford.

Council
Direction
Various Staff 2/18/2025
12/3/2024 Update to the City Council on the
rollout of the My Hanford App
City Manager Brian Johnson 3/18/2025
12/17/2024 Presentation to the City Council on the
City’s draft Social Media Policy and
discussion of guidelines for the City’s
various social media platforms.

Council
Direction
Brian Johnson 3/4/2025
12/17/2024 Presentation to the City Council on the
collection and approved uses of past
and future Park Impact Fees under the
current Impact Fee Study adopted by
Council in 2019.

Council
Direction
Various Staff 4/15/2025
1/21/2025 Further discussion of future changes to
Council Compensation as allowed
under SB329.

City Manager Mario
Cifuentez
8/5/2025

Page 282 of 282 ends
← All documents from this meeting