Hanford City Council
December 16, 2025

Kings-Tulare HSR Station Equity and Displacement Analysis October 2024
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 2
Map 1. Kings-Tulare HSR Station Area, City of Hanford, and Kings County

Kings-Tulare HSR Station Equity and Displacement Analysis October 2024
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 3
Key Findings and Recommendations
Key Findings
With the significant forthcoming public infrastructure investment in the KingsTulare High Speed Rail Station and an objective of supporting inclusive economic development, it is important to understand the extent to which displacement pressures may worsen. The Station Area, City of Hanford, and Kings County are in a rural area with many Census Tracts that have been characterized as disadvantaged by both Federal and State government agencies. While considered disadvantaged, the current conditions of the community do not reflect socioeconomic characteristics that point to any existing gentrification or displacement risk. A very high-level examination of residential gentrification and displacement in the Station Area, City, and County found the following between 2012 and 2022, as summarized in Table 1:
• income levels remained static
• rental housing costs decreased
• high levels of renter-occupied cost burdened households • increases in college-educated residents
• increases in homeowner residents
• decreases in the proportion of White residents
However, it is also worth noting the difference between the overall Station Area and the Census Tracts1 located in the center of the City and surrounding Lacey Blvd areas, both of which will be closely impacted by the development of the HSR.

These census tracts reflect the following downward trends over the 2012 to 2022 period:
• very-low and low-income households
• decreases in rental housing costs
• declines the proportion of college-educated residents • decreases in the proportion of homeowner residents
While existing conditions indicate that displacement from gentrification is unlikely given current conditions, the purpose of this Analysis is to help prevent future displacement.
1 Census Tracts 8, 9 (split to 9.01 and 9.02), and 10.02.

Kings-Tulare HSR Station Equity and Displacement Analysis October 2024
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 4
Recommendations and Future Benefits
The findings from this assessment are intended to be used, in part, to help EPS establish actionable strategies that can be applied in the City and Station Plan Area to help minimize the potential for gentrification-related displacement due to the development of the Tulare-Kings HSR Station. The process will encompass stakeholder involvement and technical analyses and will culminate in targeted strategies to guide development, prioritize funding, and facilitate investment in equitable social, financial, and health outcomes for existing residents and businesses.

Potential actional strategies include:
• Conducting stakeholder outreach to supplement the high-level quantitative gentrification and displacement assessment.
• Supplement existing City strategies that mitigate gentrification and displacement with additional policies to stabilize the Station Area:
‒ Facilitate production of both market-rate and affordable housing. ‒ Preserve affordable rental housing.
‒ Strengthen and supplement neighborhood stabilization policies.

Kings-Tulare HSR Station Equity and Displacement Analysis October 2024
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 5
Table 1. Gentrification and Displacement Assessment Summary Item 2012 2022 2012 2022 2012 2022 2012 2022
Proposed Kings-Tulare Station
Area Census Tracts [1] [2] [3]
1 Low Income Median Income 2.3% 28.4% 29.1% 59.1% 52.5% 59.5% 44.7%

6.02 Moderate Income Moderate Income 0.5% 42.7% 48.4% 70.5% 58.7% 63.0% 70.1%

6.01 Moderate Income - NA 43.5% NA 49.7% NA 70.0% NA

6.03 - Moderate Income (0.1%) NA 45.2% NA 37.8% NA 81.5%

6.04 - Moderate Income (2.3%) NA 45.2% NA 44.7% NA 75.9%

7.02 Median Income Median Income 1.1% 24.0% 27.1% 54.8% 41.1% 64.3% 67.7% 8 Low Income Low Income (0.9%) 15.1% 14.7% 36.7% 29.2% 48.5% 62.3% 9 Very Low Income - N/A 25.6% NA 35.8% NA 39.4% NA

9.01 - Very Low Income (1.1%) NA 17.2% NA 27.2% NA 38.7%

9.02 - Very Low Income (2.1%) NA 17.2% NA 27.5% NA 24.0%

10.01 Moderate Income Moderate Income 1.7% 26.0% 46.5% 50.3% 42.1% 69.0% 67.1%

10.02 Very Low Income Very Low Income 0.4% 7.0% 11.3% 22.4% 14.2% 33.5% 32.1%

10.03 Median Income Low Income (0.3%) 15.7% 18.8% 26.8% 21.3% 64.1% 82.0% 11 Very Low Income Very Low Income (0.8%) 9.5% 12.7% 14.7% 5.7% 42.6% 36.7% 12 Median Income Low Income 1.9% 23.8% 28.6% 53.4% 47.8% 56.7% 43.2% Total Station Area Median Income Median Income (0.4%) 26.3% 29.6% 43.1% 35.6% 57.3% 60.4% City of Hanford Total Median Income Median Income (0.3%) 27.1% 31.4% 42.6% 35.5% 57.0% 61.9% Kings County Total Low Income Low Income 0.3% 20.2% 23.8% 35.5% 30.1% 52.8% 54.9% Source: United States Department of Housing and Urban Development FY 2022 Income Limits; State of California Department of Housing and Community Development, "State Income Limits for 2022"; ACS; EPS.

Proportion of White
Residents
Proportion of Homeowner
Residents
Proportion College-Educated
Residents
Avg. Annual %
Change in Rental
Housing Costs
Income Level

Kings-Tulare HSR Station Equity and Displacement Analysis October 2024
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 6
Federal - and State- Defined
Disadvantaged Communities
There are a variety of California and federal geographically based programs and designations that are pertinent to geographically disadvantaged communities and relevant to addressing equity and displacement issues. The primary programs and designations relevant to the Hanford Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail planning effort are described below.

CalEnviroScreen 4.0
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 is a mapping tool developed by the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) at the request of the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA). It evaluates the impact of pollution on communities from an environmental justice perspective, quantifying the cumulative effects of pollution and identifying populations especially vulnerable to these impacts. This is achieved using environmental, health, and socioeconomic data to produce scores for every census tract in the state, identifying SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities (DACs).

Communities can be designated as DACs not only due to pollution burden but also if they have high concentrations of low-income residents, high unemployment rates, low home ownership, high rent burden, sensitive populations (those with high rates of asthma, low birthweight, and/or cardiovascular disease), or low educational attainment. The DAC designation is used to allocate Cap-and-Trade funding and direct climate investments to communities overburdened by pollution and the impacts of climate change.

Map 2 below reflects the CalEnviroScreen assessment of Kings County and the surrounding areas. The map assigns one of the following 4 definitions to each Census Tract:
• Version 3.0 DACs: Tracts receiving the top 25% of CalEnviroScreen 3.0 scores qualify as DACs. Additionally, the top 5% of pollution-burdened tracts are identified as DACs if their socioeconomic or health data is too unreliable to produce an overall CalEnviroScreen score.
• Version 4.0 High Pollution: Version 4.0 (released October 2021) includes more sources of pollution to make more comprehensive evaluations of air and drinking water contamination, as well as evaluating risks to children from lead-based paint in older homes.2 Tracts receiving the highest 5% of 2 Summary of Changes in CalEnviroScreen Version 4.0, by OEHHA.

Kings-Tulare HSR Station Equity and Displacement Analysis October 2024
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 7
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 cumulative pollution scores are designated as DACs under this category.
• Version 4.0 Top 25%: Defined by CalEPA as those in the top 25% of CalEnviroScreen scores as listed by Version 3.0 with the addition of the 4.0 factors.
• Tribal Lands: Lands under the control of federally recognized Tribes are designated as DACs.

Transit And Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP)
The TIRCP funds capital improvements to intercity or commuter railways (as well as urban rail transit, bus, or ferry services) to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and vehicle miles traveled as well as congestion within existing transit programs. Public agencies that operate or have planning responsibility for the aforementioned transit services are eligible for funding. At least 25% of TIRCP funds must go to projects that “provide direct, meaningful and assured benefits to disadvantaged communities.” In 2023, $20,262,000 of TIRCP funding was allocated to the Tulare Cross Valley Corridor Zero Emission Bus Expansion and $387 million was allocated to the Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project to fully fund Caltrain rail electrification and new train acquisition.

Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP)
The LCTOP provides “operating and capital assistance for transit agencies to reduce greenhouse gas emission and improve mobility, with a priority on serving disadvantaged communities.” The LCTOP supports new or expanded rail services, among other projects, that serve to reduce GHG emissions. At least 50% of the funding goes to projects that benefit DACs. Example projects include the BART expansion from South Fremont to Milpitas and San Jose ($5.4 million from the LCTOP) and $51.3 million in operating expenses for the Los Angeles County Metro E line light rail line.

Kings-Tulare HSR Station Equity and Displacement Analysis October 2024
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 8
Map 2. CalEnviroScreen 4.0: Kings County by Census Tract

Kings-Tulare HSR Station Equity and Displacement Analysis October 2024
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 9
Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool (CEJST)
In response to Executive Order 14008, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) developed the Climate and Environmental Justice Screening Tool to identify overburdened and underserved communities across the nation based on the following eight indicators: climate change, energy, health, housing, legacy pollution, transportation, water and wastewater, and workforce development. The tool includes “interactive maps with indicators to assist agencies in defining and identifying disadvantaged communities,” as described in the Justice40 Interim Guidance.3
Through the Federal DOT Justice40 program, DACs are eligible for grant funding towards projects that generate benefits in one or more of the following areas:
clean transit, affordable and sustainable housing, remediation and reduction of legacy pollution, training and workforce development, climate change, clean energy and energy efficiency, and clean water and wastewater infrastructure.

Potential grant funding sources include:
• Federal-State Partnership for Intercity Passenger Rail Program (FSP-National) • Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) ‒ Next round begins October 14th - applications open for 90 days.

See Map 3 for the CEJST area map for Kings County and surrounding areas. 3 M-21-28 (whitehouse.gov)

Kings-Tulare HSR Station Equity and Displacement Analysis October 2024
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 10
Map 3. Federal Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool: Kings County by Census Tract

Kings-Tulare HSR Station Equity and Displacement Analysis October 2024
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 11
Residential Gentrification and
Displacement Assessment
Given the objective of supporting inclusive economic development, it is important to understand the extent to which gentrification pressures exist and/or may be accelerated by the significant forthcoming public infrastructure investment in the Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station. To address this issue, this analysis draws from an extensive body of research and well-documented gentrification evaluation methodologies developed by the UC Berkeley Urban Displacement Project and the University of Texas at Austin’s The Uprooted Project. EPS prepared a similar but simplified, very high-level, quantitative-based methodology for the purpose of assessing current conditions in the Station Area, City, and County.4 5 Residential Gentrification Methodological Approach
The methodology used in this analysis relies on socioeconomic data obtained from the U.S. Census American Community Survey (ACS) to measure gentrification conditions and estimate the potential for low-income household displacement as of 2022 in the Station Area, City, and County.6 The methodology is a very highlevel version based on metrics that are theorized to contribute to gentrification and displacement conditions as described further below.

1. Household income. This criterion categorizes the income-level of the households in each Census Tract in the Station Area based on the notion that tracts with a concentration of existing low-income households are susceptible to gentrification and displacement whereas tracts with a concentration of moderate and above households are susceptible to increasing exclusivity (exclusion of low-income households). A Census Tract's household income category was assigned based on where the median household income fell within income categories defined by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) Income Limits for Kings County (i.e., lowincome, moderate-income, high-income).

2. Change in household income category. This criterion reflects the change in the number of low-income households in each Census Tract from 2012 to 2022. An incline in income category signals the potential displacement as well 4 For more information on the UC Berkeley Urban Displacement Project research and methodology, refer to the following publications on their Web site:
https://www.urbandisplacement.org/publications.
5 For more information on University of Texas at Austin’s The Uprooted Project, refer to their Web site: https://sites.utexas.edu/gentrificationproject/. 6 The most recent year of data provided by the ACS.

Kings-Tulare HSR Station Equity and Displacement Analysis October 2024
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 12
as susceptibility to gentrification when coupled with other factors present in that tract.

3. Rental housing costs. This criterion measures the average annual change in median gross rent in the Census Tract, as high rent burdens (and significant changes in rental rates) are strongly associated with both gentrification and displacement. In combination with the low-income category status and other metrics, moderate to significant increases in rental housing costs in or near a Census Tract can signify early-to-advanced gentrification status.

4. The proportion of college-educated residents. This criterion measures the percentage of residents with an Associate’s degree or higher compared to the County as a whole in both 2012 and 2022. In combination with the household income category status and other metrics, a higher percentage of collegeeducated residents is strongly associated with susceptibility to gentrification and displacement of low-income households.

5. The proportion of White residents. This criterion measures the percentage of residents that identify as White compared to the County as a whole in both 2012 and 2022. In combination with the household income category status and other metrics, a higher percentage of White residents may be associated with susceptibility to gentrification and displacement of low-income households.

6. The proportion of Homeowner-residents. This criterion measures the percentage of residents that own their home compared to the County as a whole in both 2012 and 2022. In combination with the household income category status and other metrics, a higher percentage of homeowners may be associated with exclusivity of low-income households.

Gentrification and Displacement Existing Conditions
Similar to the Urban Displacement Project approach, the analysis defined household income profiles for each Census Tract using ACS data as the basis for determining whether an area would be considered along the spectrum of either gentrification or exclusivity (i.e., higher-income and higher housing cost areas that likely provide limited housing opportunities for low-income households).

Thus, each Census Tract was assigned a very low, low-, median, or moderateincome profile designation based on HCD Income Limits which reflect estimated vulnerability to gentrification and displacement pressures (i.e., predominantly very low- and low-income household Census Tracts are more vulnerable than median- to moderate-income Census Tracts).

Kings-Tulare HSR Station Equity and Displacement Analysis October 2024
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 13
Once an income profile was defined, EPS examined the combination of the income profile with the remaining 5 categories listed above related to determining potential risk for displacement or gentrification or exclusivity. Although difficult to measure, the demographic gentrification criteria—including increases in college educated and white residents—can be used as a proxy.

The majority of households in the Station Area are categorized as moderate- or above-income levels compared to County households, which are on average defined as low income. Approximately 45 percent of Station Area households live in areas that have Moderate-to-High income levels reflecting the potential to become exclusive to low-income households. The average households located in the Census Tract in the northern portion of the Station Area within the City boundaries are at moderate-or-above income levels.

The Census Tracts located in the center of the City, along Lacey Blvd reflect a greater proportion of very-low- and low-income households. See Table 2 below for HCD’s Income Limits for 2012 and 2022 and Appendix A Table A-5 and Figure 1 for area incomes.

Table 2. Income Limits for Kings County (2012$ and 2022$) Income Level % of AMI
Very Low Income >30% to ≤50% AMI 50% $26,100
Low Income >50% to ≤80% AMI 80% $41,700
Median Income >80% to ≤100% AMI 100% $52,100
Moderate Income >100% AMI to ≤120% AMI 120% $62,550
Very Low Income >30% to ≤50% AMI 50% $35,100
Low Income >50% to ≤80% AMI 80% $56,100
Median Income >80% to ≤100% AMI 100% $72,250
Moderate Income >100% AMI to ≤120% AMI 120% $86,700
[1] The average persons per household for the City of Hanford is 3.13 per the ACS.

Source: United States Department of Housing and Urban Development FY 2022 Income Limits; State of California Department of Housing and Community Development, "State Income Limits for 2022"; EPS.
2022 in 2022$
2012 in 2012$
Kings County Income Limits
Based on 3 Persons per
Household [1]

Kings-Tulare HSR Station Equity and Displacement Analysis October 2024
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 14
Figure 1. Income Distribution: Station Area (2012 and 2022) Source: American Community Survey Table S1901.

Over the past decade household income levels in the Station Area have shifted to reflect a larger divide between disadvantaged and well-off, with an overall increase in households categorized as very low- or lowincome countered by an increase in moderate- or above-income households. The proportion of households defined as very low-income as well as median-income both decreased from 28 percent to 25 percent, and 19 percent down to 13 percent, reflectively. Conversely the number of low-income households increased from 13 percent up to 18 percent as well as moderate income households from 40 percent up to 45 percent.7 See Appendix A Table A-5.

While rental housing costs in the Station Area and City have decreased slightly over the past decade more than half of renter-occupied households in these areas have been and are still considered housing cost burdened during this time. After adjusting for inflation, the weighted average of median rents (based on the number of households) in the Station Area and the City decreased by an average annual rate of less than 1 percent and increased by less than 1 percent in the County. The decrease in housing costs is good in terms of mitigating displacement. Average median rents as of 2022 are similar in the Station Area, City, and County. While rents have not increased between 2012 and 2022 once adjusted for inflation, during this same period more than half of renters have been and are considered housing cost burdened in all three areas, paying more than 30 percent of their household income on housing 7 Income level categories based on HCD’s income limits for 2012 and 2022.

Kings-Tulare HSR Station Equity and Displacement Analysis October 2024
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 15
costs. Additionally, more than 20 percent in all 3 areas are considered severely housing cost burdened, spending more than half of their household income on rent. See Figure 2.

Figure 2. Rent Burden by Income: Station Area (2022)
Source: American Community Survey Table 25074; EPS.

Kings-Tulare HSR Station Equity and Displacement Analysis October 2024
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 16
The proportion of college-educated residents in all three areas increased slightly over the past decade. Each area had a smaller share of high school dropouts in 2022 compared to 2012. The proportion population attaining an Associate’s, Bachelor’s, and Graduate/Professional degree rose in each of the three geographies slightly. Overall, no educational attainment category saw dramatic changes during this period.

Despite overall population growth, all three areas saw significant reductions in the proportion of the population that identifies as White.

The City’s White population dropped by 10 percent, while the Station Area and County’s each decreased by nearly 15 percent. From 2012 to 2022, the Station Area, City, and County all shifted to more racially and ethnically diverse communities. The Hispanic/Latino population rose in each of the three areas, with growth ranging from a 10 percent increase Countywide to an almost 18 percent increase in the City. The multiracial population also grew in all three geographies, more than doubling in the Station Area and City, and increasing by one-third in the County.

Figure 3. Race and Ethnicity Composition: Station Area (2012 and 2022)
Source: American Community Survey Table DP05; EPS.

Kings-Tulare HSR Station Equity and Displacement Analysis October 2024
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 17
The proportion of Homeowner-residents has increased over the past decade. The Average homeownership rate in the Station Area rose from 57 percent to 60 percent, the City’s rose from 57 percent to 62 percent, while the County’s increased from 53 percent to 55 percent. The increase in home ownership can help reduce displacement risk.

Figure 4. Housing Tenure: Station Area (2012 and 2022)
Source: American Community Survey Table DP04; EPS.

Kings-Tulare HSR Station Equity and Displacement Analysis October 2024
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 18
Potential Next Steps and Policy
Considerations
While the effect of gentrification has the potential to contribute to prosperity and an enhanced quality of life for residents and businesses in the Station Area, investment in the area can cause real estate prices to rise, displacing existing residents and places of business and potentially changing the community’s cultural history and social structure. Programmatic and public policy interventions are necessary to mitigate gentrification and pressures on the most vulnerable populations.

This section identifies ways in which the City could potentially establish actionable strategies to help invest in the City and Station Area to help minimize gentrification-related displacement.
• Conduct stakeholder outreach to supplement the high-level quantitative gentrification and displacement assessment. Given the data limitations, quantitative data analysis should be supplemented by qualitative data to confirm or refine conclusions. Changes to the neighborhood’s cultural fabric may be challenging to discern through quantitative methods. To supplement the quantitative analyses presented in this memorandum, a stakeholder survey could be used to further understand demographic, cultural, and socioeconomic changes for the purpose of crafting policies or developing programs to mitigate gentrification and displacement. • Supplement existing City strategies that mitigate gentrification and displacement with additional policies to stabilize the Station Area. The City and other non-City organizations currently have a set of policies and programs in place in the City. There are existing programs and initiatives to improve City conditions relating to creating and improving sustainable living environments, housing, inclusive economic development, and access to services and infrastructure improvements. As considerable investment in the Station Area comes online, there are several strategies that have been identified as effective in mitigating displacement in some communities, although these strategies should be vetted with City staff and community stakeholders to determine feasibility within the area.8 9 8 Chapple, Karen, and Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, 2021. White Paper on Anti-Displacement Strategy Effectiveness. https://www.urbandisplacement.org/sites/default/files/images/carb_antidisplacement_policy_white_paper_3.4.21_final_accessible.pdf [Accessed August 2021]. 9 Similar to research on the causes and effects of gentrification, research regarding the effectiveness of policies mitigating gentrification and displacement concluded a mix of findings and identified a need for further research to determine the factors or community characteristics that lead to desired outcomes.

Kings-Tulare HSR Station Equity and Displacement Analysis October 2024
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 19
‒ Facilitate production of both market-rate and affordable housing.

Housing production is an effective mitigating approach in the context of a strong housing market with high demand and limited supply. By increasing the supply of housing, particularly affordable housing, in strong markets, housing costs can be moderated and relieve displacement pressures.10 Policies that further streamline the entitlement process, and reduce development costs and other risks to developers, should be contemplated. This strategy requires the presence of strong housing market conditions to be effective, and a long timeframe and significant costs to implement
‒ Preserve affordable rental housing. In contrast with housing production strategies, strategies that preserve both subsidized and unsubsidized affordable housing units do not require a strong housing market to be effective since they apply to existing units and can be implemented in the short-term. Preservation strategies found to be the most effective at mitigating gentrification and displacement include preserving naturally occurring affordable housing through rehabilitation programs that subsidize upgrades and other unit improvements in order to maintain steady rental rates. In addition, community land trusts (CLTs) or other policies that allow for collective ownership and tenant control of the land can not only mitigate displacement but provide opportunities for building wealth. Research on CLTs caution that this type of initiative tends to help moderate-income households, rather than the most vulnerable populations.11
‒ Strengthen and supplement neighborhood stabilization policies.

The City is an Entitlement Jurisdiction that receives funds from the U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development that are used to improve and provide housing and economic opportunities. The City develops a Consolidated Plan each year as a part of the Community Development Block Grant program. The City could consider implementing additional strategies such as a foreclosure assistance and tenant right to counsel program. Neighborhood stabilization strategies were found to have a direct and immediate impact to mitigating gentrification and displacement in particular when multiple programs are implemented simultaneously.12 10 Chapple, Karen, and Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, 2021. White Paper on Anti-Displacement Strategy Effectiveness. https://www.urbandisplacement.org/sites/default/files/images/carb_antidisplacement_policy_white_paper_3.4.21_final_accessible.pdf [Accessed August 2021]. 11 Ibid.
12 Ibid.

APPENDIX A:

Existing Conditions
Table A-1 Population & Household Growth........................A-6 Table A-2 Race/Ethnicity Demographics (5 pages).............A-7 Table A-3 Age Demographics (4 pages) .........................A-12 Table A-4 Educational Demographics (4 pages)...............A-16 Table A-5 Median Household Income.............................A-20 Table A-6 Percentage Change in
Homeownership and Renters..........................A-21 Table A-7 Housing Units by Period Built .........................A-22 Table A-8 Households by Tenure (4 pages) ....................A-23 Table A-9 Housing Value .............................................A-27 Table A-10 Owner’s Costs as a Percentage of
Household Income by Household Income.........A-28
Table A-11 Rent as a Percentage of Household
Income by Household Income ........................A-29 Table A-12 Employed Residents by Industry.....................A-30 Table A-13 Jobs by Industry ..........................................A-31

Appendix A
October 2024
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) A-1
Appendix A: Existing Conditions
Socioeconomic Trends
Population and Households
The City’s population grew significantly from 2012 to 2022, increasing by nearly 8 percent from approximately 53,700 to almost 58,000 residents, as shown in Table A-1. The Station Area and Kings County experienced marginal population growth, with increases of 3 percent and about one-third of a percent, respectively. Household growth outpaced population growth across the three geographies, ranging from 5 to 10 percent. This trend led to decreases in persons-per-household (PPH) in each area: the City and Station Area saw minimal decreases, while the County saw a more substantial decrease from 3.73 to 3.50 PPH.

Race & Ethnicity
From 2012 to 2022, the Station Area, City, and County all shifted to more racially and ethnically diverse communities (see Table A-2). Despite overall population growth, all three regions saw significant reductions in their White populations: the City’s White population dropped by 10 percent, while the Station Area and County’s each decreased by nearly 15 percent. The County’s Black population decreased by nearly 9 percent though the Station Area and City both saw increases of 10.5 and 18 percent, respectively. The Hispanic/Latino population rose in each of the three regions, with growth ranging from a 10 percent increase Countywide to an almost 18 percent increase in the City. The multiracial population also grew in all three geographies, more than doubling in the Station Area and City, and increasing by one-third in the County.

Though they make up a small portion of the total population, the number of Native Americans and Alaska Natives has grown in the Station Area and City by nearly 80 and 70 percent, respectively, despite a Countywide decrease of nearly 8 percent. The Asian population has increased in all three areas, with growth ranging from 5 percent to nearly 20 percent, alongside a decline in the population of Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islanders.

Age
As shown in Table A-3, similar to nationwide trends populations across the board in the Station Area, City, and County shifted to higher percentages of residents aged 65 or older from 2012 to 2022, with median ages increasing by a little over a year in the Station Area, City, and County. The most significant change came from the age-65+ population, which grew by 26 percent in the Station Area and almost 32 percent in both the City and the County. The age-55-64 population also increased in each area, with growth ranging from 6 percent to 13 percent in the

Appendix A
October 2024
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) A-2
Station Area, City, and County. However, most age groups saw marginal changes in population share. The only notable change that was not at the upper end of the age range was in the under-5 years population, which decreased in all three geographies, by 7 to 13 percent.

Educational Attainment
Educational attainment improved marginally but consistently from 2012 to 2022 across all three geographies, as shown in Table A-4. Each area had a smaller share of high school dropouts in 2022 compared to 2012. High school graduation rates remained similar over the period studied. Rates of Associate’s, Bachelor’s, and Graduate/Professional degree attainment all rose in each of the three geographies from 2012 to 2022, with the biggest change seen in Associate’s degrees (up 1 to 3 percent). Overall, no educational attainment category saw dramatic changes during this period.

Median Household Income
Median incomes (adjusted for inflation) rose slightly in all three geographies from 2012 to 2022 with the largest increase countywide. In the Station Area, median income increased by less than one percent, remaining slightly above $75,000. In the City, it rose almost 1 percent to approximately $74,000, and Countywide it increased 5 percent to $68,500 (see Table A-5).

Employment Trends
The most prominent industries for City resident workers in 2022 were Public Administration, Health Care and Social Assistance, and Retail Trade, followed by Manufacturing, Educational Services, and Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, and Hunting (see Table A-12). In the County, the most prominent industries in 2022 for residents were Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, and Hunting, Health Care and Social Assistance, Public Administration, and Retail Trade, followed by Manufacturing and Educational Services.

The industry that provides the most jobs in the City is, by far, Health Care and Social Assistance, which employs nearly double the number of people who work in the next-largest sector, Retail Trade (see Table A-13). Significant employment is also seen in Public Administration13, Accommodation and Food Service, and Educational Services. In the County, Health Care and Social Assistance also leads in employment but by a smaller margin than in the City. Other significant employers in the County are Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, and Hunting, Public Administration, Manufacturing, Retail Trade, and Accommodation and Food Services.
13 OnTheMap shows NAICS Industry Sector 9A/9B as ‘Administrative Government,’ which is shown in the ACS as Public Administration.

Appendix A
October 2024
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) A-3
When comparing total employment of City and County residents (Table A-12) to total employment within the two jurisdictions (Table A-13), it is apparent that there is a net outflow of jobs to other regions, as more residents are employed than there are jobs in both jurisdictions.

Housing Tenure
A larger portion of Station Area, City, and Conty residents owned their homes within increases in ownership between 2012 and 2022, as shown in Table A-6.

The average homeownership rate in the Station Area rose from 57 percent to 60 percent, the City’s rose from 57 percent to 62 percent, while the County’s increased from 53 percent to 55 percent.

Residential Real Estate Trends
Housing Inventory
The most prolific homebuilding period in the region was from 1980 to 1999 (see Table A-7). Almost 35 percent of homes in the Station Area were built during that timeframe, as were 36 percent of the City’s homes and 33 percent of the County’s homes. Many homes were also built between 1960 and 1979 as well, encompassing 23 to 25 percent of homes in the three geographies. Homes built before 1960 make up 15 to 17 percent of housing units in the three geographies, just under the share of homes built between 2000 and 2013, which total 22 percent of Station Area homes and about 18 percent in both the City and the County.

Nearly 80 percent of occupied dwelling units in the region are single-family (both attached and detached) homes, with similar shares across the three geographies (see Table A-8). In the Station Area, 7 percent of households live in 2–4-unit structures, similar to the City and County, where both shares are 8 percent.

Approximately 10 percent of residents in each geography live in 5+ unit structures. In the Station Area, 4 percent of households live in mobile homes or RVs. This rate is comparable in the County (5 percent), and slightly lower in the City (2 percent).

Almost all multi-unit structures were renter-occupied in both years studied (see Table A-8). In both the City and Station Area, 96 percent of households in multiunit structures were renters in 2022. Similarly, 97 percent of the County’s households living in multi-unit structures rented in 2022. The same trends were observed in 2012.

Appendix A
October 2024
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) A-4
Housing Costs
Median home values increased significantly in the three geographies studied, adjusted for inflation (see Table A-9). The average of median home values in the Station Area Census Tracts increased by 9 percent, while the City’s median rose 12 percent and the County’s median rose 10 percent.

The weighted average median rent in the Station Area actually decreased slightly after adjusting for inflation by about 4 percent and by an average of 3 percent in the City. Average median rents in the County rose slightly at about 3 percent.

Housing Cost Burden
Homeowner-Occupied
Out of all owner-occupied households living in the City, 83 percent of those earning under $50,000 are considered to be burdened by housing costs, spending more than 30 percent of their income on housing (see Table A-10). Just over half of City households earning between $50,000 and $74,999 are cost burdened.

Of those earning over $75,000, about 10 percent are cost burdened, this group makes up the vast majority of homeowners in the region. The County and Station Area have similar rates across the board, except a higher share of County residents who earn under $50,000 that are cost burdened: about 88 percent.

Renter-Occupied
Approximately half of households in the Station Area, City, and County are considered housing cost burdened, meaning they spend 30 percent or more of their annual household income on housing costs (see Table A-11).

Low-earning households in the region face significant rent burden. Of both City and Station Area households earning less than $20,000 annually, approximately 66 percent of renters are considered severely rent burdened meaning they spend over 50% of their income on housing costs.14 In the County, that figure is over 70 percent. households in that income bracket are considered rent burdened (over 30% of income to rent), with just 7 percent of City and Station Area Households and 4 percent of County Households who earning under $20,000 that are not rent burdened.

Rent burden is less significant for higher-earning households. In each of the three geographies, approximately one quarter of households who earn between $20,000 and $49,999 are not burdened by rental costs. About 30 percent of households in the Station Area and City in this income bracket face severe rent burdens, while 25 percent of County households are severely rent burdened. 14 In each income bracket, some renters’ cost burdens are not computed. This share is most significant in the under-$20,000 income bracket. See Table A-11.

Appendix A
October 2024
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) A-5
Considering households with incomes ranging from $50,000 to $74,999, 21 percent (Station Area) to 27 percent (County) face a rent burden. According to ACS estimates, no Station Area or City households in this income bracket face a severe rent burden, while under one third of one percent of County households earning $50,000 to $74,999 do. From 70 to 75 percent of like households are not burdened by rent. Of households earning over $75,000, just 3 to 4 percent face rent burdens. Under 1 percent of such households in each geography face a severe rent burden.

DRAFT
Table A-1Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TODExisting Conditions AnalysisPopulation & Household Growth (2012-2022) Geography City/County 2012 2022
Growth
Rate 2012 2022
Growth
Rate 2012 2022 Difference
Proposed Kings-Tulare Station
Area Census Tracts [1] [2] [3]
1 County 3,610 3,078 (14.7%) 1,206 1,111 (7.9%) 2.99 2.77 (0.22)6.02 City 5,988 5,915 (1.2%) 2,156 2,096 (2.8%) 2.78 2.82 0.04

6.01 City 9,812 N/A 16.4% 2,878 N/A 21.7% 3.41 N/A 0.15

6.03 City N/A 3,249 N/A N/A 885 N/A N/A 3.67 N/A 6.04 City N/A 8,174 N/A N/A 2,618 N/A N/A 3.12 N/A

7.01 City 5,398 5,817 7.8% 1,865 2,188 17.3% 2.89 2.66 (0.24)

7.02 Overlap/Both 4,226 4,575 8.3% 1,519 1,641 8.0% 2.78 2.79 0.018 Overlap/Both 5,173 5,284 2.1% 1,586 1,500 (5.4%) 3.26 3.52 0.26 9 City 7,883 N/A (6.8%) 2,789 N/A (7.9%) 2.83 N/A (0.03)

9.01 City N/A 3,647 N/A N/A 1,381 N/A N/A 2.64 N/A 9.02 City N/A 3,697 N/A N/A 1,189 N/A N/A 3.11 N/A

10.01 Overlap/Both 4,362 5,558 27.4% 1,382 1,961 41.9% 3.16 2.83 (0.32)10.02 City 5,108 4,189 (18.0%) 1,259 1,054 (16.3%) 4.06 3.97 (0.08)

10.03 Overlap/Both 5,727 6,792 18.6% 1,501 1,834 22.2% 3.82 3.70 (0.11) 11 Overlap/Both 6,395 6,373 (0.3%) 1,748 1,773 1.4% 3.66 3.59 (0.06)12 Overlap/Both 2,743 2,364 (13.8%) 898 664 (26.1%) 3.05 3.56 0.51 Total Station Area 66,425 68,712 3.4% 20,787 21,895 5.3% 3.22 3.20 (0.03)City of Hanford Total 53,695 57,920 7.9% 16,955 18,495 9.1% 3.17 3.13 (0.04)Kings County Total 151,982 152,515 0.4% 40,767 43,594 6.9% 3.73 3.50 (0.23) Source: ACS Tables DP05 and S1101 5-Year Estimates 2012 and 2022; EPS [1] As denoted, some Station Area Census Tracts overlap City boundaries and encompass unincorporated portions of the County. [2] Tract 6.01 in 2010 became Tracts 6.03 and 6.04 in 2020.[3] Tract 9 in 2010 became Tracts 9.01 and 9.02 in 2020.

Population Households PPH
Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-6

DRAFT
Table A-2 Page 1 of 5Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TODExisting Conditions AnalysisRace/Ethnicity Demographics (2012-2022)Geography City/County 2012 2022 % Change Total Change 2012 2022 % Change Total ChangeProposed Kings-Tulare Station Area Census Tracts [1] [2] [3]
1 County 2,135 1,616 (24.3%) (519) 83 23 (72.3%) (60)6.02 City 4,222 3,472 (17.8%) (750) 416 729 75.2% 313

6.01 City 4,877 N/A 0.0% 1 594 N/A 2.9% 17

6.03 City N/A 1,228 N/A N/A N/A 419 N/A N/A 6.04 City N/A 3,650 N/A N/A N/A 192 N/A N/A

7.01 City 3,081 3,217 4.4% 136 247 281 13.8% 347.02 Overlap/Both 2,314 1,882 (18.7%) (432) 5 321 6,320.0% 3168 Overlap/Both 1,901 1,543 (18.8%) (358) 250 85 (66.0%) (165) 9 City 2,824 N/A (28.8%) (814) 483 N/A 41.0% 198

9.01 City N/A 992 N/A N/A N/A 48 N/A N/A 9.02 City N/A 1,018 N/A N/A N/A 633 N/A N/A

10.01 Overlap/Both 2,194 2,340 6.7% 146 204 263 28.9% 59

10.02 City 1,144 594 (48.1%) (550) 90 117 30.0% 27

10.03 Overlap/Both 1,533 1,447 (5.6%) (86) 262 330 26.0% 68 11 Overlap/Both 940 362 (61.5%) (578) 783 330 (57.9%) (453) 12 Overlap/Both 1,466 1,130 (22.9%) (336) 22 29 31.8% 7Total Station Area 28,631 24,491 (14.5%) (4,140) 3,439 3,800 10.5% 361City of Hanford Total 22,851 20,549 (10.1%) (2,302) 3,043 3,588 17.9% 545Kings County Total 53,890 45,886 (14.9%) (8,004) 9,978 9,091 (8.9%) (887) Source: ACS Table DP05 5-Year Estimates 2012 and 2022; EPS. [1] As denoted, some Station Area Census Tracts overlap City boundaries and encompass unincorporated portions of the County. [2] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 6.01 was split into Census TractsTracts 6.03 and 6.04.[3] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 9 split into Census Tracts 9.01 and 9.02.

White Black or African American
Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-7

DRAFT
Table A-2 Page 2 of 5Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TODExisting Conditions AnalysisRace/Ethnicity Demographics (2012-2022)Geography City/County 2012 2022 % Change Total Change 2012 2022 % Change Total ChangeProposed Kings-Tulare Station Area Census Tracts [1] [2] [3]
1 County - - - - 88 28 (68.2%) (60)6.02 City - 14 - 14 58 58 - 0

6.01 City 41 N/A (100.0%) (41) 839 N/A 2.1% 18

6.03 City N/A - N/A N/A N/A 458 N/A N/A 6.04 City N/A - N/A N/A N/A 399 N/A N/A

7.01 City 16 48 200.0% 32 315 231 (26.7%) (84)7.02 Overlap/Both 18 88 388.9% 70 90 113 25.6% 23 8 Overlap/Both 11 51 363.6% 40 14 69 392.9% 55
9 City 41 N/A 36.6% 15 86 N/A (73.3%) (63)

9.01 City N/A 56 N/A N/A N/A 19 N/A N/A 9.02 City N/A - N/A N/A N/A 4 N/A N/A

10.01 Overlap/Both 9 19 111.1% 10 316 598 89.2% 282

10.02 City 13 - (100.0%) (13) 140 109 (22.1%) (31)

10.03 Overlap/Both 19 - (100.0%) (19) 94 241 156.4% 147 11 Overlap/Both 7 24 242.9% 17 85 104 22.4% 19
12 Overlap/Both 16 41 156.3% 25 67 13 (80.6%) (54)Total Station Area 191 341 78.5% 150 2,192 2,444 11.5% 252City of Hanford Total 172 288 67.4% 116 1,942 2,316 19.3% 374Kings County Total 1,229 1,133 (7.8%) (96) 5,395 5,705 5.7% 310 Source: ACS Table DP05 5-Year Estimates 2012 and 2022; EPS. [1] As denoted, some Station Area Census Tracts overlap City boundaries and encompass unincorporated portions of the County. [2] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 6.01 was split into Census TractsTracts 6.03 and 6.04.[3] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 9 split into Census Tracts 9.01 and 9.02.

Native American and Alaska Native Asian
Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-8

DRAFT
Table A-2 Page 3 of 5Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TODExisting Conditions AnalysisRace/Ethnicity Demographics (2012-2022)Geography City/County 2012 2022 % Change Total Change 2012 2022 % Change Total ChangeProposed Kings-Tulare Station Area Census Tracts [1] [2] [3]
1 County - 17 - 17 1,213 1,349 11.2% 1366.02 City - - - 0 1,202 1,550 29.0% 348

6.01 City - N/A - 0 3,254 N/A 36.0% 1,170

6.03 City N/A - N/A N/A N/A 1,082 N/A N/A 6.04 City N/A - N/A N/A N/A 3,342 N/A N/A

7.01 City - - - 0 1,624 1,858 14.4% 2347.02 Overlap/Both - - - 0 1,670 2,062 23.5% 3928 Overlap/Both - - - 0 2,949 3,436 16.5% 487 9 City - N/A - 13 4,328 N/A 2.7% 119

9.01 City N/A - N/A N/A N/A 2,418 N/A N/A 9.02 City N/A 13 N/A N/A N/A 2,029 N/A N/A

10.01 Overlap/Both 13 - (100.0%) (13) 1,539 1,983 28.8% 444

10.02 City - - - 0 3,632 3,220 (11.3%) (412)

10.03 Overlap/Both 78 31 (60.3%) (47) 3,741 4,604 23.1% 863 11 Overlap/Both - - - 0 4,387 5,163 17.7% 776
12 Overlap/Both - - - 0 1,157 1,084 (6.3%) (73)Total Station Area 91 61 (33.0%) (30) 30,696 35,180 14.6% 4,484City of Hanford Total 91 44 (51.6%) (47) 24,631 29,019 17.8% 4,388Kings County Total 278 255 (8.3%) (23) 77,382 85,622 10.6% 8,240 Source: ACS Table DP05 5-Year Estimates 2012 and 2022; EPS. [1] As denoted, some Station Area Census Tracts overlap City boundaries and encompass unincorporated portions of the County. [2] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 6.01 was split into Census TractsTracts 6.03 and 6.04.[3] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 9 split into Census Tracts 9.01 and 9.02.

Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Hispanic or Latino (of any race) Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-9

DRAFT
Table A-2 Page 4 of 5Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TODExisting Conditions AnalysisRace/Ethnicity Demographics (2012-2022)Geography City/County 2012 2022 % Change Total Change 2012 2022 % Change Total ChangeProposed Kings-Tulare Station Area Census Tracts [1] [2] [3]
1 County 1 - (100.0%) (1) 90 45 (50.0%) (45)6.02 City - - - 0 90 92 2.2% 2

6.01 City 35 N/A N/A (35) 172 N/A N/A 481

6.03 City N/A - N/A N/A N/A 62 N/A N/A 6.04 City N/A - N/A N/A N/A 591 N/A N/A

7.01 City 17 - (100.0%) (17) 98 182 85.7% 847.02 Overlap/Both - - - 0 129 109 (15.5%) (20)8 Overlap/Both - - - 0 48 100 108.3% 52 9 City 14 N/A N/A (14) 107 N/A N/A 7

9.01 City N/A - N/A N/A N/A 114 N/A N/A 9.02 City N/A - N/A N/A N/A - N/A N/A

10.01 Overlap/Both - 115 - 115 87 240 175.9% 153

10.02 City - - - 0 89 149 67.4% 60

10.03 Overlap/Both - - - 0 - 139 - 139
11 Overlap/Both - - - 0 193 390 102.1% 197
12 Overlap/Both - - - 0 15 67 346.7% 52Total Station Area 67 115 71.6% 48 1,118 2,280 103.9% 1,162City of Hanford Total 66 115 74.2% 49 899 2,001 122.6% 1,102Kings County Total 380 286 (24.7%) (94) 3,450 4,537 31.5% 1,087 Source: ACS Table DP05 5-Year Estimates 2012 and 2022; EPS. [1] As denoted, some Station Area Census Tracts overlap City boundaries and encompass unincorporated portions of the County. [2] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 6.01 was split into Census TractsTracts 6.03 and 6.04.[3] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 9 split into Census Tracts 9.01 and 9.02.

Some other race Two or More Races
Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-10

DRAFT
Table A-2 Page 5 of 5Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TODExisting Conditions AnalysisRace/Ethnicity Demographics (2012-2022)Geography City/County 2012 2022 % Change Total ChangeProposed Kings-Tulare Station Area Census Tracts [1] [2] [3]
1 County 3,610 3,078 (14.7%) (532)6.02 City 5,988 5,915 (1.2%) (73)

6.01 City 9,812 N/A N/A 1,611

6.03 City N/A 3,249 N/A N/A 6.04 City N/A 8,174 N/A N/A

7.01 City 5,398 5,817 7.8% 419

7.02 Overlap/Both 4,226 4,575 8.3% 3498 Overlap/Both 5,173 5,284 2.1% 111 9 City 7,883 N/A N/A (539)

9.01 City N/A 3,647 N/A N/A 9.02 City N/A 3,697 N/A N/A

10.01 Overlap/Both 4,362 5,558 27.4% 1,196

10.02 City 5,108 4,189 (18.0%) (919)

10.03 Overlap/Both 5,727 6,792 18.6% 1,065
11 Overlap/Both 6,395 6,373 (0.3%) (22)
12 Overlap/Both 2,743 2,364 (13.8%) (379)Total Station Area 66,425 68,712 3.4% 2,287City of Hanford Total 53,695 57,920 7.9% 4,225Kings County Total 151,982 152,515 0.4% 533 Source: ACS Table DP05 5-Year Estimates 2012 and 2022; EPS. [1] As denoted, some Station Area Census Tracts overlap City boundaries and encompass unincorporated portions of the County. [2] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 6.01 was split into Census TractsTracts 6.03 and 6.04.[3] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 9 split into Census Tracts 9.01 and 9.02.

Total
Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-11

DRAFT
Table A-3 Page 1 of 4Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TODExisting Conditions AnalysisAge Demographics (2012-2022)Geography City/County 2012 2022 % Change 2012 2022 % ChangeProposed Kings-Tulare Station Area Census Tracts [1] [2] [3]
1 County 3,610 3,078 (14.7%) 36.7 42.9 16.9%6.02 City 5,988 5,915 (1.2%) 34.3 33.3 (2.9%)6.01 City 9,812 N/A N/A 30.6 N/A N/A

6.03 City N/A 3,249 N/A N/A 35.1 N/A6.04 City N/A 8,174 N/A N/A 31.1 N/A

7.01 City 5,398 5,817 7.8% 38.9 38.3 (1.5%)7.02 Overlap/Both 4,226 4,575 8.3% 35.4 36.8 4.0%8 Overlap/Both 5,173 5,284 2.1% 31.7 33.0 4.1%9 City 7,883 N/A N/A 29.2 N/A N/A

9.01 City N/A 3,647 N/A N/A 33.2 N/A9.02 City N/A 3,697 N/A N/A 29.5 N/A

10.01 Overlap/Both 4,362 5,558 27.4% 34.8 36.9 6.0%10.02 City 5,108 4,189 (18.0%) 25.9 32.0 23.6%10.03 Overlap/Both 5,727 6,792 18.6% 30.6 31.2 2.0%11 Overlap/Both 6,395 6,373 (0.3%) 26.3 27.7 5.3%12 Overlap/Both 2,743 2,364 (13.8%) 37.4 30.2 (19.3%)Total/Weighted Average Station Area 66,425 68,712 3.4% 31.9 33.4 4.4%City of Hanford Total 53,695 57,920 7.9% 31.5 32.7 3.8%Kings County Total 151,982 152,515 0.4% 31.2 32.1 2.9% Source: ACS Table DP05 5-Year Estimates 2012 and 2022; EPS. [1] As denoted, some Station Area Census Tracts overlap City boundaries and encompass unincorporated portions of the County.[2] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 6.01 was split into Census TractsTracts 6.03 and 6.04. [3] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 9 split into Census Tracts 9.01 and 9.02.

Total Population Median Age
Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-12

DRAFT
Table A-3 Page 2 of 4Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TODExisting Conditions AnalysisAge Demographics (2012-2022)Geography City/County 2012 2022 % Change 2012 2022 % ChangeProposed Kings-Tulare Station Area Census Tracts [1] [2] [3]
1 County 181 177 (2.2%) 903 535 (40.8%)6.02 City 389 433 11.3% 1,360 1,473 8.3%6.01 City 977 N/A N/A 2,589 N/A N/A

6.03 City N/A 239 N/A N/A 972 N/A6.04 City N/A 708 N/A N/A 2,237 N/A

7.01 City 328 288 (12.2%) 1,052 908 (13.7%)7.02 Overlap/Both 359 399 11.1% 778 736 (5.4%)8 Overlap/Both 417 245 (41.2%) 1,273 1,478 16.1%9 City 579 N/A N/A 2,183 N/A N/A

9.01 City N/A 156 N/A N/A 1,010 N/A9.02 City N/A 306 N/A N/A 967 N/A

10.01 Overlap/Both 271 312 15.1% 890 1,054 18.4%10.02 City 596 331 (44.5%) 1,289 989 (23.3%)10.03 Overlap/Both 488 503 3.1% 1,510 1,597 5.8%11 Overlap/Both 612 642 4.9% 1,719 1,853 7.8%12 Overlap/Both 182 95 (47.8%) 684 683 (0.1%)Total/Weighted Average Station Area 5,379 4,834 (10.1%) 16,230 16,492 1.6%City of Hanford Total 4,456 4,134 (7.2%) 12,993 14,055 8.2%Kings County Total 12,819 11,152 (13.0%) 34,029 34,115 0.3% Source: ACS Table DP05 5-Year Estimates 2012 and 2022; EPS. [1] As denoted, some Station Area Census Tracts overlap City boundaries and encompass unincorporated portions of the County.[2] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 6.01 was split into Census TractsTracts 6.03 and 6.04. [3] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 9 split into Census Tracts 9.01 and 9.02.

Under 5 years 5-19 years
Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-13

DRAFT
Table A-3 Page 3 of 4Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TODExisting Conditions AnalysisAge Demographics (2012-2022)Geography City/County 2012 2022 % Change 2012 2022 % ChangeProposed Kings-Tulare Station Area Census Tracts [1] [2] [3]
1 County 672 494 (26.5%) 1,113 843 (24.3%)6.02 City 1,298 1,083 (16.6%) 1,382 1,390 0.6%6.01 City 2,213 N/A N/A 2,460 N/A N/A

6.03 City N/A 401 N/A N/A 1,154 N/A6.04 City N/A 1,663 N/A N/A 2,311 N/A

7.01 City 1,113 1,332 19.7% 1,483 1,585 6.9%7.02 Overlap/Both 936 998 6.6% 1,143 1,255 9.8%8 Overlap/Both 1,215 1,114 (8.3%) 1,305 1,401 7.4%9 City 1,675 N/A N/A 1,936 N/A N/A

9.01 City N/A 734 N/A N/A 854 N/A9.02 City N/A 1,033 N/A N/A 666 N/A

10.01 Overlap/Both 1,039 1,264 21.7% 1,169 1,394 19.2%10.02 City 1,368 1,018 (25.6%) 1,099 996 (9.4%)10.03 Overlap/Both 1,325 1,564 18.0% 1,534 2,008 30.9%11 Overlap/Both 1,486 1,280 (13.9%) 1,496 1,119 (25.2%)12 Overlap/Both 449 533 18.7% 710 510 (28.2%)Total/Weighted Average Station Area 14,789 14,511 (1.9%) 16,830 17,486 3.9%City of Hanford Total 12,237 12,313 0.6% 13,511 14,902 10.3%Kings County Total 38,129 37,682 (1.2%) 42,043 39,139 (6.9%) Source: ACS Table DP05 5-Year Estimates 2012 and 2022; EPS. [1] As denoted, some Station Area Census Tracts overlap City boundaries and encompass unincorporated portions of the County.[2] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 6.01 was split into Census TractsTracts 6.03 and 6.04. [3] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 9 split into Census Tracts 9.01 and 9.02. 20-34 years 35-54 years
Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-14

DRAFT
Table A-3 Page 4 of 4Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TODExisting Conditions AnalysisAge Demographics (2012-2022)Geography City/County 2012 2022 % Change 2012 2022 % ChangeProposed Kings-Tulare Station Area Census Tracts [1] [2] [3]
1 County 301 529 75.7% 440 500 13.6%6.02 City 837 655 (21.7%) 722 881 22.0%6.01 City 961 N/A N/A 612 N/A N/A

6.03 City N/A 263 N/A N/A 220 N/A6.04 City N/A 357 N/A N/A 898 N/A

7.01 City 626 668 6.7% 796 1,036 30.2%7.02 Overlap/Both 465 508 9.2% 545 679 24.6%8 Overlap/Both 360 444 23.3% 603 602 (0.2%)9 City 694 N/A N/A 816 N/A N/A

9.01 City N/A 401 N/A N/A 492 N/A9.02 City N/A 408 N/A N/A 317 N/A

10.01 Overlap/Both 452 538 19.0% 541 996 84.1%10.02 City 319 453 42.0% 437 402 (8.0%)10.03 Overlap/Both 481 576 19.8% 389 544 39.8%11 Overlap/Both 534 732 37.1% 548 747 36.3%12 Overlap/Both 342 267 (21.9%) 376 276 (26.6%)Total/Weighted Average Station Area 6,372 6,799 6.7% 6,825 8,590 25.9%City of Hanford Total 5,129 5,432 5.9% 5,369 7,084 31.9%Kings County Total 12,818 14,456 12.8% 12,144 15,971 31.5% Source: ACS Table DP05 5-Year Estimates 2012 and 2022; EPS. [1] As denoted, some Station Area Census Tracts overlap City boundaries and encompass unincorporated portions of the County.[2] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 6.01 was split into Census TractsTracts 6.03 and 6.04. [3] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 9 split into Census Tracts 9.01 and 9.02. 55-64 years 65 years and above
Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-15

DRAFT
Table A-4 Page 1 of 4Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TODExisting Conditions AnalysisEducational Demographics (2012-2022)Geography City/County 2012 2022 Total % Total %Proposed Kings-Tulare Station Area Census Tracts [1] [2] [3]
1 County 2,370 2,179 275 11.6% 460 21.1%6.02 City 3,849 3,428 96 2.5% 79 2.3%6.01 City 5,600 N/A 258 4.6% N/A N/A

6.03 City N/A 1,881 N/A N/A 56 3.0%6.04 City N/A 4,780 N/A N/A 553 11.6%

7.01 City 3,663 4,171 125 3.4% 115 2.8%7.02 Overlap/Both 2,806 3,101 177 6.3% 122 3.9%8 Overlap/Both 2,997 3,090 572 19.1% 290 9.4%9 City 4,670 N/A 546 11.7% N/A N/A

9.01 City N/A 2,370 N/A N/A 160 6.8%9.02 City N/A 2,285 N/A N/A 313 13.7%

10.01 Overlap/Both 2,878 4,013 144 5.0% 138 3.4%10.02 City 2,663 2,488 639 24.0% 563 22.6%10.03 Overlap/Both 3,398 3,984 578 17.0% 530 13.3%11 Overlap/Both 3,369 3,488 960 28.5% 1,082 31.0%12 Overlap/Both 1,739 1,375 315 18.1% 119 8.7%Total Station Area 40,002 42,633 4,684 11.7% 4,580 10.7%City of Hanford Total 32,351 35,719 3,429 10.6% 3,396 9.5%Kings County Total 92,096 95,084 14,275 15.5% 12,591 13.2% Source: ACS Table S1501 5-Year Estimates 2012 and 2022.[1] As denoted, some Station Area Census Tracts overlap City boundaries and encompass unincorporated portions of the County.[2] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 6.01 was split into Census TractsTracts 6.03 and 6.04.[3] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 9 split into Census Tracts 9.01 and 9.02.

Population 25 years and
over
Less than 9th grade
2012 2022
Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-16

DRAFT
Table A-4 Page 2 of 4Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TODExisting Conditions AnalysisEducational Demographics (2012-2022)Geography City/County Total % Total % Total % Total %Proposed Kings-Tulare Station Area Census Tracts [1] [2] [3]
1 County 310 13.1% 168 7.7% 521 22.0% 683 31.3%6.02 City 92 2.4% - 0.0% 797 20.7% 730 21.3%6.01 City 286 5.1% N/A N/A 1,042 18.6% N/A N/A

6.03 City N/A N/A 134 7.1% N/A N/A 223 11.9%6.04 City N/A N/A 167 3.5% N/A N/A 792 16.6%

7.01 City 106 2.9% 259 6.2% 927 25.3% 1,036 24.8%7.02 Overlap/Both 210 7.5% 175 5.6% 895 31.9% 824 26.6%8 Overlap/Both 312 10.4% 189 6.1% 1,004 33.5% 1,386 44.9%9 City 719 15.4% N/A N/A 1,116 23.9% N/A N/A

9.01 City N/A N/A 445 18.8% N/A N/A 702 29.6%9.02 City N/A N/A 301 13.2% N/A N/A 974 42.6%

10.01 Overlap/Both 279 9.7% 268 6.7% 682 23.7% 621 15.5%10.02 City 304 11.4% 314 12.6% 887 33.3% 794 31.9%10.03 Overlap/Both 445 13.1% 645 16.2% 1,060 31.2% 1,075 27.0%11 Overlap/Both 603 17.9% 517 14.8% 994 29.5% 935 26.8%12 Overlap/Both 148 8.5% 69 5.0% 438 25.2% 354 25.7%Total Station Area 3,815 9.5% 3,651 8.6% 10,363 25.9% 11,129 26.1%City of Hanford Total 2,912 9.0% 3,089 8.6% 8,379 25.9% 8,920 25.0%Kings County Total 12,157 13.2% 11,669 12.3% 23,945 26.0% 25,683 27.0% Source: ACS Table S1501 5-Year Estimates 2012 and 2022.[1] As denoted, some Station Area Census Tracts overlap City boundaries and encompass unincorporated portions of the County.[2] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 6.01 was split into Census TractsTracts 6.03 and 6.04.[3] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 9 split into Census Tracts 9.01 and 9.02. 9th to 12th grade, no diploma High school graduate (includes equivalency) 2012 2022 2012 2022
Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-17

DRAFT
Table A-4 Page 3 of 4Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TODExisting Conditions AnalysisEducational Demographics (2012-2022)Geography City/County Total % Total % Total % Total %Proposed Kings-Tulare Station Area Census Tracts [1] [2] [3]
1 County 590 24.9% 235 10.8% 225 9.5% 138 6.3%6.02 City 1,220 31.7% 960 28.0% 477 12.4% 393 11.5%6.01 City 1,579 28.2% N/A N/A 790 14.1% N/A N/A

6.03 City N/A N/A 429 22.8% N/A N/A 223 11.9%6.04 City N/A N/A 1,297 27.1% N/A N/A 672 14.1%

7.01 City 1,275 34.8% 1,263 30.3% 396 10.8% 660 15.8%7.02 Overlap/Both 853 30.4% 1,139 36.7% 244 8.7% 377 12.2%8 Overlap/Both 659 22.0% 770 24.9% 171 5.7% 318 10.3%9 City 1,088 23.3% N/A N/A 523 11.2% N/A N/A

9.01 City N/A N/A 612 25.8% N/A N/A 293 12.4%9.02 City N/A N/A 346 15.1% N/A N/A 288 12.6%

10.01 Overlap/Both 1,025 35.6% 1,120 27.9% 271 9.4% 550 13.7%10.02 City 647 24.3% 535 21.5% 85 3.2% 219 8.8%10.03 Overlap/Both 782 23.0% 985 24.7% 211 6.2% 362 9.1%11 Overlap/Both 492 14.6% 511 14.7% 209 6.2% 272 7.8%12 Overlap/Both 423 24.3% 440 32.0% 231 13.3% 174 12.7%Total Station Area 10,632 26.6% 10,642 25.0% 3,832 9.6% 4,939 11.6%City of Hanford Total 8,864 27.4% 9,111 25.5% 3,009 9.3% 4,397 12.3%Kings County Total 23,116 25.1% 22,540 23.7% 7,183 7.8% 8,600 9.0% Source: ACS Table S1501 5-Year Estimates 2012 and 2022.[1] As denoted, some Station Area Census Tracts overlap City boundaries and encompass unincorporated portions of the County.[2] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 6.01 was split into Census TractsTracts 6.03 and 6.04.[3] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 9 split into Census Tracts 9.01 and 9.02. 2022 2012 2022
Some college, no degree
2012
Associate's degree
Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-18

DRAFT
Table A-4 Page 4 of 4Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TODExisting Conditions AnalysisEducational Demographics (2012-2022)Geography City/County Total % Total % Total % Total %Proposed Kings-Tulare Station Area Census Tracts [1] [2] [3]
1 County 313 13.2% 329 15.1% 135 5.7% 166 7.6%6.02 City 754 19.6% 805 23.5% 412 10.7% 461 13.4%6.01 City 1,142 20.4% N/A N/A 504 9.0% N/A N/A

6.03 City N/A N/A 580 30.8% N/A N/A 236 12.5%6.04 City N/A N/A 778 16.3% N/A N/A 521 10.9%

7.01 City 535 14.6% 648 15.5% 300 8.2% 190 4.6%7.02 Overlap/Both 362 12.9% 360 11.6% 67 2.4% 104 3.4%8 Overlap/Both 207 6.9% 132 4.3% 75 2.5% 5 0.2%9 City 579 12.4% N/A N/A 93 2.0% N/A N/A

9.01 City N/A N/A 132 5.6% N/A N/A 26 1.1%9.02 City N/A N/A 49 2.1% N/A N/A 14 0.6%

10.01 Overlap/Both 311 10.8% 855 21.3% 167 5.8% 461 11.5%10.02 City 93 3.5% 37 1.5% 8 0.3% 26 1.0%10.03 Overlap/Both 268 7.9% 291 7.3% 54 1.6% 96 2.4%11 Overlap/Both 77 2.3% 143 4.1% 34 1.0% 28 0.8%12 Overlap/Both 165 9.5% 197 14.3% 17 1.0% 22 1.6%Total Station Area 4,807 12.0% 5,336 12.5% 1,867 4.7% 2,356 5.5%City of Hanford Total 4,109 12.7% 4,652 13.0% 1,650 5.1% 2,154 6.0%Kings County Total 8,473 9.2% 9,541 10.0% 2,947 3.2% 4,460 4.7% Source: ACS Table S1501 5-Year Estimates 2012 and 2022.[1] As denoted, some Station Area Census Tracts overlap City boundaries and encompass unincorporated portions of the County.[2] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 6.01 was split into Census TractsTracts 6.03 and 6.04.[3] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 9 split into Census Tracts 9.01 and 9.02. 2012 2022 2012 2022
Bachelor's degree Graduate or professional degree
Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-19

DRAFT
Table A-5Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TODExisting Conditions AnalysisMedian Household Income (2012-2022)Geography City/County 2012$ HCD Definition [4] 2012 in 2022$ 2022$ HCD Definition [4] % ChangeProposed Kings-Tulare Station Area Census Tracts [1] [2] [3]
1 County $49,795 Low Income $66,538 $79,449 Median Income 19.4%

6.02 City $74,273 Moderate Income $99,246 $101,970 Moderate Income 2.7%

6.01 City $89,318 Moderate Income $119,350 N/A - (12.3%)

6.03 City N/A - N/A $138,750 Moderate Income N/A

6.04 City N/A - N/A $93,172 Moderate Income N/A

7.01 City $64,954 Moderate Income $86,794 $88,953 Moderate Income 2.5%

7.02 Overlap/Both $54,583 Median Income $72,936 $76,193 Median Income 4.5% 8 Overlap/Both $42,235 Low Income $56,436 $66,316 Low Income 17.5%9 City $39,196 Very Low Income $52,375 N/A - (12.2%)

9.01 City N/A - N/A $37,841 Very Low Income N/A

9.02 City N/A - N/A $55,472 Very Low Income N/A

10.01 Overlap/Both $70,611 Moderate Income $94,353 $89,614 Moderate Income (5.0%)10.02 City $31,645 Very Low Income $42,285 $43,462 Very Low Income 2.8%10.03 Overlap/Both $55,245 Median Income $73,820 $71,972 Low Income (2.5%)11 Overlap/Both $32,347 Very Low Income $43,223 $37,377 Very Low Income (13.5%)12 Overlap/Both $55,179 Median Income $73,732 $69,292 Low Income (6.0%) Total/Weighted Average Station Area $54,948 Median Income $76,113 $76,359 Median Income 0.3%City of Hanford Total $54,767 Median Income $73,182 $73,819 Median Income 0.9%Kings County Total $48,761 Low Income $65,156 $68,540 Low Income 5.2% Source: ACS Table S1903 5-Year Estimates 2012 and 2022.[1] As denoted, some Station Area Census Tracts overlap City boundaries and encompass unincorporated portions of the County. [2] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 6.01 was split into Census TractsTracts 6.03 and 6.04.[3] Between 2012 and 2022, Census Tract 9 split into Census Tracts 9.01 and 9.02.

Median Household Income
2012 2022
Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-20

DRAFT
Table A-6Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TODExisting Conditions AnalysisPercentage Change in Homeownership and Renters (2012-2022) Geography 2012 % of Total 2022 % of Total
City of Hanford
Owner-Occupied 9,672 57.0% 11,444 61.9% 18.3%Renter-Occupied 7,283 43.0% 7,051 38.1% (3.2%) All Households 16,955 100.0% 18,495 100.0% 9.1%
Kings County
Owner-Occupied 21,512 52.8% 23,924 54.9% 11.2%Renter-Occupied 19,255 47.2% 19,670 45.1% 2.2% All Households 40,767 100.0% 43,594 100.0% 6.9%
Source: ACS Table B25032 5-Year Estimates 2012 and 2022. 2012-2022
% Change
Households by Tenure
Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-21

DRAFT
Table A-7Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TODExisting Conditions AnalysisHousing Units by Period Built (2022) Geography City/County
1939 or
earlier
1940 to
1959
1960 to
1979
1980 to
1999
2014 or
later Total
Proposed Kings-Tulare Station Area
Census Tracts [1] [2] [3]
1 County 10.9% 10.8% 37.1% 24.6% 16.6% 1,2496.02 City 2.3% 17.5% 17.2% 47.7% 15.3% 2,189

6.03 City 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 12.0% 87.0% 8946.04 City 1.5% 0.8% 8.6% 27.8% 61.2% 2,634

7.01 City 0.4% 17.2% 36.7% 39.9% 5.9% 2,236

7.02 Overlap/Both 0.0% 2.3% 18.6% 68.0% 11.2% 1,6768 Overlap/Both 1.4% 16.2% 41.4% 38.1% 2.8% 1,608

9.01 City 23.5% 33.3% 23.2% 20.1% 0.0% 1,5909.02 City 24.2% 12.8% 30.4% 32.7% 0.0% 1,274

10.01 Overlap/Both 0.7% 4.6% 19.9% 28.0% 46.8% 2,05610.02 City 3.7% 18.4% 39.5% 33.4% 5.0% 1,12510.03 Overlap/Both 0.2% 6.6% 21.8% 30.5% 41.0% 1,97911 Overlap/Both 3.6% 17.9% 34.3% 38.4% 5.8% 1,85312 Overlap/Both 10.8% 22.8% 30.3% 26.2% 9.8% 762Total Station Area 5.0% 12.3% 25.0% 34.8% 22.9% 23,125City of Hanford Total 4.6% 11.3% 22.7% 36.1% 25.3% 19,374Kings County Total 5.1% 11.8% 24.8% 32.5% 25.8% 46,500 Source: ACS Table DP04 5-Year Estimates 2015 and 2022.[1] As denoted, some Station Area Census Tracts overlap City boundaries and encompass unincorporated portions of the County.[2] Tract 6.01 in 2010 became Tracts 6.03 and 6.04 in 2020.[3] Tract 9 in 2010 became Tracts 9.01 and 9.02 in 2020.

Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-22

DRAFT

Table A-8Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TODExisting Conditions AnalysisHouseholds by Tenure (2012-2022)Geography City/County 1 Unit 2-4 Units 5+ Units Mobile/ RV Total
(Owner
Occupied) % of Total 1 Unit 2-4 Units 5+ Units Mobile/ RV Total
(Renter
Occupied) % of Total
Proposed Kings-Tulare Station Area
Census Tracts [1] [2] [3]
1 County 682 5 - 30 717 59.5% 379 10 - 100 489 0.4%

6.02 City 1,359 - - - 1,359 63.0% 178 174 445 - 797 0.0%

6.01 City 2,014 - - - 2,014 70.0% 673 72 119 - 864 0.0%

6.03 City N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

6.04 City N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

7.01 City 1,369 11 - - 1,380 74.0% 395 24 66 - 485 0.6%

7.02 Overlap/Both 774 - - 203 977 64.3% 428 88 8 18 542 0.0%8 Overlap/Both 760 8 - 2 770 48.5% 519 86 192 19 816 0.5%9 City 1,051 36 - 13 1,100 39.4% 772 405 498 14 1,689 1.3%

9.01 City N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

9.02 City N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

10.01 Overlap/Both 849 - 23 82 954 69.0% 203 42 147 36 428 0.0%10.02 City 422 - - - 422 33.5% 353 197 280 7 837 0.0%

10.03 Overlap/Both 962 - - - 962 64.1% 518 13 8 - 539 0.0%11 Overlap/Both 635 - - 109 744 42.6% 507 285 132 80 1,004 0.0%12 Overlap/Both 462 8 - 39 509 56.7% 285 8 - 96 389 0.9% Total Station Area 11,339 68 23 478 11,908 57.3% 5,210 1,404 1,895 370 8,879 42.7%City of Hanford 9,268 55 23 326 9,672 57.0% 4,041 1,339 1,862 41 7,283 30.6%Kings County 20,578 121 28 785 21,512 52.8% 11,033 3,171 3,888 1,163 19,255 17.7% Source: ACS Table B25032 5-Year Estimates 2012 and 2022.[1] As denoted, some Station Area Census Tracts overlap City boundaries and encompass unincorporated portions of the County.[2] Tract 6.01 in 2010 became Tracts 6.03 and 6.04 in 2020.[3] Tract 9 in 2010 became Tracts 9.01 and 9.02 in 2020. 2012
Owner Occupied Renter Occupied
Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-23

DRAFT

Table A-8Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TODExisting Conditions AnalysisHouseholds by Tenure (2012-2022)Geography City/County 1 Unit 2-4 Units 5+ Units Mobile/ RV Total
(Owner
Occupied) % of Total 1 Unit 2-4 Units 5+ Units Mobile/ RV Total
(Renter
Occupied) % of Total
Proposed Kings-Tulare Station Area
Census Tracts [1] [2] [3]
1 County 468 9 - 20 497 44.7% 413 28 45 128 614 55.3%

6.02 City 1,406 63 - - 1,469 70.1% 135 308 184 - 627 29.9%6.01 City N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

6.03 City 721 - - - 721 81.5% 158 - 6 - 164 18.5%6.04 City 1,986 - - - 1,986 75.9% 499 114 - 19 632 24.1%

7.01 City 1,590 - - - 1,590 72.7% 400 63 135 - 598 27.3%7.02 Overlap/Both 840 - - 271 1,111 67.7% 484 31 - 15 530 32.3%8 Overlap/Both 920 - - 15 935 62.3% 332 78 137 18 565 37.7%9 City N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

9.01 City 535 - - - 535 38.7% 283 213 350 - 846 61.3%

9.02 City 285 - - - 285 24.0% 275 325 291 13 904 76.0%

10.01 Overlap/Both 1,120 77 8 111 1,316 67.1% 218 57 359 11 645 32.9%10.02 City 338 - - 20 343 32.1% 321 124 236 30 711 66.5%10.03 Overlap/Both 1,504 - - - 1,504 82.0% 212 40 24 54 330 18.0% 11 Overlap/Both 593 - - 58 651 36.7% 485 248 328 61 1,122 63.3%12 Overlap/Both 258 - - 29 287 43.2% 283 - - 94 377 56.8% Total Station Area 12,564 149 8 524 13,230 60.4% 4,498 1,629 2,095 443 8,665 39.5%City of Hanford 10,979 140 8 317 11,444 61.9% 3,286 1,562 2,023 180 7,051 38.1% Kings County 22,612 198 34 1,080 23,924 54.9% 11,029 3,480 4,477 684 19,670 45.1% Source: ACS Table B25032 5-Year Estimates 2012 and 2022.[1] As denoted, some Station Area Census Tracts overlap City boundaries and encompass unincorporated portions of the County.[2] Tract 6.01 in 2010 became Tracts 6.03 and 6.04 in 2020.[3] Tract 9 in 2010 became Tracts 9.01 and 9.02 in 2020. 2022
Owner Occupied Renter Occupied
Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-24

DRAFT

Table A-8Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TODExisting Conditions AnalysisHouseholds by Tenure (2012-2022)Geography City/County 1 Unit 2-4 Units 5+ Units Mobile/ RV Total 1 Unit 2-4 Units 5+ Units Mobile/ RV Total Proposed Kings-Tulare Station Area
Census Tracts [1] [2] [3]
1 County 1,061 15 - 130 1,206 881 37 45 148 1,111

6.02 City 1,537 174 445 - 2,156 1,541 371 184 - 2,096

6.01 City 2,687 72 119 - 2,878 N/A N/A N/A N/A -

6.03 City N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 879 - 6 - 885

6.04 City N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2,485 114 - 19 2,618

7.01 City 1,764 35 66 - 1,865 1,990 63 135 - 2,188

7.02 Overlap/Both 1,202 88 8 221 1,519 1,324 31 - 286 1,6418 Overlap/Both 1,279 94 192 21 1,586 1,252 78 137 33 1,5009 City 1,823 441 498 27 2,789 N/A N/A N/A N/A -

9.01 City N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 818 213 350 - 1,381

9.02 City N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 560 325 291 13 1,189

10.01 Overlap/Both 1,052 42 170 118 1,382 1,338 134 367 122 1,96110.02 City 775 197 280 7 1,259 659 124 236 50 1,069

10.03 Overlap/Both 1,480 13 8 - 1,501 1,716 40 24 54 1,83411 Overlap/Both 1,142 285 132 189 1,748 1,078 248 328 119 1,77312 Overlap/Both 747 16 - 135 898 541 - - 123 664 Total Station Area 16,549 1,472 1,918 848 20,787 17,062 1,778 2,103 967 21,910City of Hanford 13,309 1,394 1,885 367 16,955 14,265 1,702 2,031 497 18,495Kings County 31,611 3,292 3,916 1,948 40,767 33,641 3,678 4,511 1,764 43,594 Source: ACS Table B25032 5-Year Estimates 2012 and 2022.[1] As denoted, some Station Area Census Tracts overlap City boundaries and encompass unincorporated portions of the County.[2] Tract 6.01 in 2010 became Tracts 6.03 and 6.04 in 2020.[3] Tract 9 in 2010 became Tracts 9.01 and 9.02 in 2020.

Total 2012 Total 2022
Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-25

DRAFT

Table A-8Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TODExisting Conditions AnalysisHouseholds by Tenure (2012-2022)Geography City/County 1 Unit 2-4 Units 5+ Units Mobile/ RV Total Change 1 Unit 2-4 Units 5+ Units Mobile/ RV Total Change Proposed Kings-Tulare Station Area
Census Tracts [1] [2] [3]
1 County (31.4%) 80.0% - (33.3%) (30.7%) 9.0% 180.0% - 28.0% 25.6%

6.02 City 3.5% - - - 8.1% (24.2%) 77.0% (58.7%) - (21.3%)

6.01 City - - - - - - - - - -

6.03 City - - - - - - - - - - 6.04 City - - - - - - - - - -

7.01 City 16.1% (100.0%) - - 15.2% 1.3% 162.5% 104.5% - 23.3%7.02 Overlap/Both 8.5% - - 33.5% 13.7% 13.1% (64.8%) (100.0%) (16.7%) (2.2%) 8 Overlap/Both 21.1% (100.0%) - 650.0% 21.4% (36.0%) (9.3%) (28.6%) (5.3%) (30.8%)9 City - - - - - - - - - -

9.01 City - - - - - - - - - - 9.02 City - - - - - - - - - -

10.01 Overlap/Both 31.9% - (65.2%) 35.4% 37.9% 7.4% 35.7% 144.2% (69.4%) 50.7%10.02 City (19.9%) - - - (18.7%) (9.1%) (37.1%) (15.7%) 328.6% (15.1%)10.03 Overlap/Both 56.3% - - - 56.3% (59.1%) 207.7% 200.0% - (38.8%) 11 Overlap/Both (6.6%) - - (46.8%) (12.5%) (4.3%) (13.0%) 148.5% (23.8%) 11.8%12 Overlap/Both (44.2%) (100.0%) - (25.6%) (43.6%) (0.7%) (100.0%) - (2.1%) (3.1%)Total Station Area 10.8% 119.1% (65.2%) 9.6% 11.1% (13.7%) 16.0% 10.6% 19.7% (2.4%)City of Hanford 18.5% 154.5% (65.2%) (2.8%) 18.3% (18.7%) 16.7% 8.6% 339.0% (3.2%)Kings County 9.9% 63.6% 21.4% 37.6% 11.2% (0.0%) 9.7% 15.1% (41.2%) 2.2% Source: ACS Table B25032 5-Year Estimates 2012 and 2022.[1] As denoted, some Station Area Census Tracts overlap City boundaries and encompass unincorporated portions of the County.[2] Tract 6.01 in 2010 became Tracts 6.03 and 6.04 in 2020.[3] Tract 9 in 2010 became Tracts 9.01 and 9.02 in 2020.

Change (2012-2022)
Owner Occupied Renter Occupied
Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-26

DRAFT
Table A-9Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TODExisting Conditions AnalysisHousing Value (in 2012 and 2022 dollars) Geography City/County Units 2012$ 2022$ Units 2022$ Avg. Annual Total Rental Units 2012$ 2022$ Rental Units 2022$ Avg. Annual TotalProposed Kings-Tulare Station Area Census Tracts [1] [2] [3]
1 County 717 $352,700 $468,599 497 $455,900 (0.3%) (2.7%) 489 $732 $973 614 $1,216 2.3% 25.0%

6.02 City 1,359 $262,800 $349,157 1,469 $351,800 0.1% 0.8% 797 $1,074 $1,427 627 $1,495 0.5% 4.8%6.01 City 2,014 $245,800 $326,571 N/A N/A N/A 11.7% 864 $1,384 $1,839 N/A N/A N/A N/A

6.03 City N/A N/A N/A 721 $376,700 1.4% N/A N/A N/A N/A 164 $1,823 (0.1%) (0.9%)

6.04 City N/A N/A N/A 1,986 $352,800 0.8% N/A N/A N/A N/A 632 $1,452 (2.3%) (21.0%)

7.01 City 1,380 $200,000 $265,721 1,590 $314,100 1.7% 18.2% 485 $1,273 $1,691 598 $1,296 (2.6%) (23.4%)7.02 Overlap/Both 977 $166,700 $221,478 1,111 $257,600 1.5% 16.3% 542 $1,113 $1,479 530 $1,648 1.1% 11.4% 8 Overlap/Both 770 $161,100 $214,038 935 $226,800 0.6% 6.0% 816 $904 $1,201 565 $1,097 (0.9%) (8.7%) 9 City 1,100 $157,600 $209,388 N/A N/A N/A 6.2% 1,689 $833 $1,107 N/A N/A N/A N/A

9.01 City N/A N/A N/A 535 $212,800 0.2% N/A N/A N/A N/A 846 $986 (1.1%) (10.9%)

9.02 City N/A N/A N/A 285 $231,800 1.0% N/A N/A N/A N/A 904 $895 (2.1%) (19.1%)

10.01 Overlap/Both 954 $204,900 $272,231 1,316 $308,600 1.3% 13.4% 428 $1,047 $1,391 645 $1,639 1.7% 17.8%10.02 City 422 $122,800 $163,153 343 $222,100 3.1% 36.1% 837 $763 $1,014 711 $1,057 0.4% 4.3%10.03 Overlap/Both 962 $158,800 $210,982 1,504 $257,600 2.0% 22.1% 539 $1,069 $1,420 330 $1,383 (0.3%) (2.6%)11 Overlap/Both 744 $107,300 $142,559 651 $187,300 2.8% 31.4% 1,004 $746 $991 1,122 $913 (0.8%) (7.9%) 12 Overlap/Both 509 $295,600 $392,736 287 $345,100 (1.3%) (12.1%) 389 $822 $1,092 377 $1,324 1.9% 21.2% Total/Weighted Avg. Station Area 11,908 $207,566 $275,774 13,230 $301,128 0.9% 9.2% 8,879 $958 $1,273 8,665 $1,223 (0.4%) (3.9%) City of Hanford Total 9,672 $197,600 $262,532 11,444 $294,100 1.1% 12.0% 7,283 $923 $1,226 7,051 $1,194 (0.3%) (2.6%) Kings County Total 21,512 $192,000 $255,092 23,924 $281,400 1.0% 10.3% 19,255 $874 $1,161 19,670 $1,201 0.3% 3.4% Source: ACS Table DP04 5-Year Estimates 2012 and 2022.[1] As denoted, some Station Area Census Tracts overlap City boundaries and encompass unincorporated portions of the County.[2] Tract 6.01 in 2010 became Tracts 6.03 and 6.04 in 2020.[3] Tract 9 in 2010 became Tracts 9.01 and 9.02 in 2020. 2012
Owner-Occupied Median Home Value

OCCUPIED HOUSING
2022 (2022$) Change Change
Renter-Occupied Median Rent
2012 2022 (2022$)
Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-27

DRAFT
Table A-10Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TODExisting Conditions AnalysisOwner's Costs as a Percentage of Household Income by Household Income (2022) Housing Cost Burden by Income Bracket [1]
OwnerOccupied
Households
Share
within
Income
Bracket
Share with
Mortage
OwnerOccupied
Households
Share
within
Income
Bracket
Share
with
Mortage
OwnerOccupied
Households
Share
within
Income
Bracket
Share
with
Mortage
Less than $20,000
Less than 30% - 0.0% - 0.0% - 0.0%
30% or more 100.0% 350 703 100.0% 412 100.0%Not Computed 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Total 350 100.0% 4.3% 703 100.0% 4% 412 100.0% 5% $20,000 to $49,999
Less than 30% 233 22.1% 426 15.6% 272 21.4%30% or more 820 77.9% 2,305 84.4% 999 78.6%Not Computed 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Total 1,053 100.0% 13.0% 2,731 100.0% 17% 1,271 100.0% 14% $50,000 to $74,999
Less than 30% 469 48.8% 1,110 47.6% 515 48.3%30% or more 493 51.2% 1,221 52.4% 552 51.7%Not Computed 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Total 962 100.0% 11.9% 2,331 100.0% 14% 1,067 100.0% 12% $75,000 or more
Less than 30% 90.3% 5,166 9,436 90.8% 5,603 88.7%
30% or more 9.7% 558 955 9.2% 717 11.3%Not Computed 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Total [1] 5,724 100.0% 70.8% 10,391 100.0% 64% 6,320 100.0% 70% Source: American Community Survey 2022 5-Year Estimates, Table S2506; EPS.

City of Hanford Kings County
[1] The top income bracket on ACS Table S2506 for share of households with a mortgage by income is $75,000 or more. The share of households with a mortgage in this row refers to this income bracket, not the $75,000 to $99,999 income bracket for the table.

Station Area
Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-28

DRAFT
Table A-11
Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TOD
Existing Conditions Analysis
Rent as a Percentage of Household Income by Household Income (2022) Rent Burden by Income
Bracket [1]
Total Renter
Households
Share
within
Income
Bracket
Total Renter
Households
Share within
Income
Bracket
Total Renter
Households
Share
within
Income
Bracket
Less than $20,000
Less than 30% 95 6.9% 95 7.4% 118 3.6%
30% to 50% 166 12.1% 166 12.9% 465 14.2%
More than 50% 904 65.7% 848 65.7% 2,312 70.5%
Not computed 210 15.3% 181 14.0% 383 11.7%
Total 1,375 100.0% 1,290 100.0% 3,278 100.0%
$20,000 to $49,999
Less than 30% 711 24.7% 568 24.5% 1,621 25.9%
30% to 50% 1,122 39.0% 930 40.1% 2,748 43.8%
More than 50% 843 29.3% 734 31.7% 1,568 25.0%
Not computed 201 7.0% 85 3.7% 331 5.3%
Total 2,877 100.0% 2,317 100.0% 6,268 100.0%
$50,000 to $74,999
Less than 30% 1,502 75.3% 1,225 74.0% 3,084 69.6%
30% to 50% 412 20.7% 394 23.8% 1199 27.1%
More than 50% - 0.0% - 0.0% 14 0.3%
Not computed 80 4.0% 37 2.2% 133 3.0%
Total 1,994 100.0% 1,656 100.0% 4,430 100.0%
$75,000 to $99,999
Less than 30% 883 87.1% 641 89.2% 2,081 87.9%
30% to 50% 93 9.2% 78 10.8% 172 7.3%
More than 50% - 0.0% - 0.0% 25 1.1%
Not computed 38 3.7% - 0.0% 89 3.8%
Total 1,014 100.0% 719 100.0% 2,367 100.0%
$100,000 or more
Less than 30% 1,325 94.3% 1,050 98.2% 3,193 96.0%
30% to 50% 5 0.4% - 0.0% 5 0.2%
More than 50% 17 1.2% - 0.0% 17 0.5%
Not computed 58 4.1% 19 1.8% 112 3.4%
Total 1,405 100.0% 1,069 100.0% 3,327 100.0%
Total
Less than 30% 4,516 52.1% 3,579 50.8% 10,097 51.3%
30% to 50% 1,798 20.8% 1,568 22.2% 4,589 23.3%
More than 50% 1,764 20.4% 1,582 22.4% 3,936 20.0%
Not computed 587 6.8% 322 4.6% 1,048 5.3%
Total 8,665 100.0% 7,051 100.0% 19,670 100.0%
Source: American Community Survey 2022 5-Year Estimates, Table S25074; EPS. [1] See Table 9 for a definition of rent burden.
[2] Totals do not add to 100% because a subset of households did not have their income-to-rent ratio computed by the American Community Survey, either because they pay no rent or because they reported zero or negative income.

Station Area City of Hanford Kings County
Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-29

DRAFT
Table A-12Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TODExisting Conditions AnalysisEmployed Residents by Industry (2012-2022)Item Total Share Total Share Total % Total Share Total Share Total %Employment By Industry (NAICS) Ag., Forestry, Fishing and Hunting (11) 1,641 7.5% 1,945 8.9% 304 18.5% 8,205 15.8% 8,176 15.7% (29) (0.4%) Mining, Quarrying, Oil & Gas Extr. (21) 7 0.0% 26 0.1% 19 271.4% 101 0.2% 98 0.2% (3) (3.0%)Utilities (22) 161 0.7% 41 0.2% (120) (74.5%) 475 0.9% 251 0.5% (224) (47.2%)Construction (23) 585 2.7% 768 3.5% 183 31.3% 1,642 3.2% 1,872 3.6% 230 14.0%Manufacturing (31-33) 1,867 8.6% 2,117 9.7% 250 13.4% 4,474 8.6% 4,661 9.0% 187 4.2%Wholesale Trade (42) 561 2.6% 658 3.0% 97 17.3% 1,614 3.1% 1,505 2.9% (109) (6.8%)Retail Trade (44-45) 2,199 10.1% 2,750 12.6% 551 25.1% 4,686 9.0% 5,475 10.5% 789 16.8%Transportation and Warehousing (48-49) 581 2.7% 771 3.5% 190 32.7% 1,724 3.3% 2,505 4.8% 781 45.3%Information (51) 247 1.1% 270 1.2% 23 9.3% 395 0.8% 403 0.8% 8 2.0%Finance and Insurance (52) 458 2.1% 384 1.8% (74) (16.2%) 737 1.4% 661 1.3% (76) (10.3%)Real Estate and Rental Leasing (53) 332 1.5% 180 0.8% (152) (45.8%) 678 1.3% 415 0.8% (263) (38.8%)Prof., Scientific, and Tech. Services (54) 741 3.4% 539 2.5% (202) (27.3%) 1,194 2.3% 1,691 3.3% 497 41.6%Mgmt of Companies and Enterprises (55) 82 0.4% 31 0.1% (51) (62.2%) 82 0.2% 31 0.1% (51) (62.2%)Admin., Support & Waste Mgmt Svcs (56) 872 4.0% 795 3.7% (77) (8.8%) 1,792 3.5% 1,733 3.3% (59) (3.3%)Educational Services (61) 2,077 9.6% 1,987 9.1% (90) (4.3%) 4,339 8.4% 4,310 8.3% (29) (0.7%)Health Care and Social Assistance (62) 3,317 15.3% 3,259 15.0% (58) (1.7%) 6,278 12.1% 6,536 12.6% 258 4.1%Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation (71) 321 1.5% 387 1.8% 66 20.6% 1,105 2.1% 935 1.8% (170) (15.4%)Accommodation and Food Services (72) 1,506 6.9% 1,671 7.7% 165 11.0% 3,487 6.7% 3,401 6.6% (86) (2.5%)Other Services (except Public Admin.) (81) 1,110 5.1% 996 4.6% (114) (10.3%) 2,167 4.2% 1,933 3.7% (234) (10.8%)Public Administration (9A-9B) 3,079 14.2% 3,408 15.7% 329 10.7% 6,745 13.0% 6,323 12.2% (422) (6.3%) Civilian Employed Population 16 Years and Over 21,744 100.0% 22,983 100.0% 1,239 5.7% 51,920 100.0% 52,915 100.0% 995 1.9% Source: ACS Table S2403 5-Year Estimates 2012 and 2022.[1] Employment by industry includes jobs which pay wages or salaries, regardless of hours worked, and does not include those who are self-employed, working unpaid for a family business or farm, or private or household workers.

Employed Residents by Industry
(2012 - 2022)
City of Hanford Kings County
2012 2022 Change 2012 2022 Change
Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-30

DRAFT
Table A-13Kings-Tulare High Speed Rail Station TODExisting Conditions AnalysisJobs by Industry (2011-2021) Item Total
% of
Total Total
% of
Total Total % Total
% of
Total Total
% of
Total Total %
Employment By Industry (NAICS)
Ag., Forestry, Fishing and Hunting (11) 177 1.2% 184 1.2% 7 4.0% 5,929 15.4% 6,236 13.8% 307 5.2%Mining, Quarrying, Oil & Gas Extr. (21) - 0.0% 0 0.0% - - 4 0.0% 2 0.0% (2) (50.0%) Utilities (22) 92 0.6% 34 0.2% (58) (63.0%) 191 0.5% 174 0.4% (17) (8.9%)Construction (23) 319 2.1% 452 2.9% 133 41.7% 941 2.4% 1,260 2.8% 319 33.9%Manufacturing (31-33) 547 3.6% 591 3.8% 44 8.0% 3,942 10.3% 4,794 10.6% 852 21.6%Wholesale Trade (42) 219 1.5% 188 1.2% (31) (14.2%) 548 1.4% 642 1.4% 94 17.2%Retail Trade (44-45) 2,272 15.1% 2,224 14.2% (48) (2.1%) 3,080 8.0% 4,133 9.1% 1,053 34.2%Transportation and Warehousing (48-49) 155 1.0% 294 1.9% 139 89.7% 691 1.8% 1,940 4.3% 1,249 180.8%Information (51) 132 0.9% 58 0.4% (74) (56.1%) 168 0.4% 81 0.2% (87) (51.8%)Finance and Insurance (52) 456 3.0% 416 2.7% (40) (8.8%) 556 1.4% 471 1.0% (85) (15.3%)Real Estate and Rental Leasing (53) 289 1.9% 202 1.3% (87) (30.1%) 384 1.0% 357 0.8% (27) (7.0%)Prof., Scientific, and Tech. Services (54) 338 2.2% 372 2.4% 34 10.1% 669 1.7% 924 2.0% 255 38.1%Mgmt of Companies and Enterprises (55) 132 0.9% 295 1.9% 163 123.5% 133 0.3% 310 0.7% 177 133.1%Admin., Support & Waste Mgmt Svcs (56) 323 2.1% 183 1.2% (140) (43.3%) 610 1.6% 533 1.2% (77) (12.6%)Educational Services (61) 1,649 10.9% 1,396 8.9% (253) (15.3%) 4,581 11.9% 3,880 8.6% (701) (15.3%)Health Care and Social Assistance (62) 3,765 25.0% 4,202 26.8% 437 11.6% 4,273 11.1% 7,918 17.5% 3,645 85.3%Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation (71) 143 0.9% 79 0.5% (64) (44.8%) 1,953 5.1% 1,705 3.8% (248) (12.7%)Accommodation and Food Services (72) 1,440 9.6% 2,060 13.1% 620 43.1% 2,386 6.2% 3,166 7.0% 780 32.7%Other Services (except Public Admin.) (81) 723 4.8% 325 2.1% (398) (55.0%) 1,598 4.2% 692 1.5% (906) (56.7%)Administrative Government (9A & 9B) 1,890 12.5% 2,112 13.5% 222 11.7% 5,806 15.1% 6,014 13.3% 208 3.6% Total Employment 15,061 100.0% 15,667 100.0% 606 4.0% 38,443 100.0% 45,232 100.0% 6,789 17.7% Source: U.S. Census OnTheMap 2011, 2021; EPS.

Area Jobs by Industry (2011-2021)
City of Hanford Kings County
2011 2021 Change 2011 2021 Change
Prepared by EPS 10/11/2024 Z:\Shared\Projects\Oakland\241000s\241045_Hanford HSR\Model\241045 Existing Conditions 9.25.24.xlsx A-31

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 1 Constraints Analysis September 2025
Section 1.0 Hanford High Speed Rail/ Cross
Valley Corridor Project Constraints
Analysis Overview
The Hanford High Speed Rail (HSR) Transit Oriented Development (TOD)/ Cross Valley Corridor (CVC) Project is a Plan Level design project for 983 acres of land on the eastern boundary of the City of Hanford. This Plan Area would primarily include medium to low density housing project and mixed-use development, focused around the California HSR station planned for the area.

The Plan Area also consists of production and innovation areas, open space buffers, and agricultural activation areas to support this new development. This Plan area was identified in the General Plan as an Area of Interest without defined densities The project would also include improvements to the CVC regional train line which would support multimodal connectivity in Kings County.

This document was prepared to support the planning efforts within the Plan Area by identifying environmental and planning constraints associated with development in the Plan Area. Some of the issues discussed in the following sections include:
• Agricultural Impacts
• Air Quality
• Biological Impacts
• Cultural Resources
• Geology and Soils
• Hazards and Hazardous Conditions
• Hydrology and Water Quality
• Noise and Vibration
• Transportation
• Utilities and Public Services
The following sections provide General Plan Policies, an overview of existing conditions, and high-level Plan Area analysis of each of these subject areas. Recommendations for compliance with planning requirements or General Plan mitigation measures are also stated where necessary.

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 2 Constraints Analysis September 2025
Section 2.0 Agricultural Resources
The land within the Plan Area is predominantly utilized for agricultural purposes and redevelopment of these areas would reduce the availability of agricultural land and impact agricultural resources.

2.1 Relevant City Policies

2.1.1 Agriculture Policies
• Policy E23 Economic Development of Agriculture - Value and support agriculture as an industry and make it a key component of Hanford’s economic development strategy. • Policy E24 Recruit Agriculture-related Businesses - Recruit businesses that are agriculturerelated, especially those that create value-added products. • Policy E25 Support Innovation in Agriculture - Support innovation in the production, processing, and distribution of agricultural products and services. • Policy E26 Protection of Agricultural Lands from Urban Encroachment - Utilize the Planned Area Boundary to delineate a long term boundary between agricultural and urban land uses, and strongly support long term agricultural operations outside the Planned Area Boundary that can be free from the threat of urban land use encroachment.

2.1.2 Development Boundaries Policies
• Policy L2 2035 Growth Boundary - Designate a 2035 Growth Boundary to serve as the limits of the area to be developed with urban uses during the 2015 to 2035 planning period.

Locate the 2035 Growth Boundary along major roadways and other natural or manmade physical features that can serve as a physical boundary between urban and agricultural uses. • Policy L6 Agriculture and the Urban Fringe - Recognize and protect the right of agricultural uses within the growth boundary to exist and continue to operate in proximity to new development on the fringes of the City.

2.1.3 City Form Policies
• Policy L13 Development Boundary at 13th Avenue - Locate the 2035 Growth Boundary at 13th Avenue to maintain a rural agricultural land use buffer between Hanford and the communities of Grangeville and Armona.

2.1.4 Residential Land Use Policies
• Policy L29 Agriculture - Recognize the right of agriculture to exist and continue to operate in proximity to the new residential development on the fringes of the city. Deed restrictions

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 3 Constraints Analysis September 2025
may be required which inform future residents of the right of agriculture to continue within the limits of the law without interference or protest from nearby property owners.

2.1.5 Open Space Policies
• Policy L95 Purpose of Open Space Land Use Designation - Establish the Open Space land use designation to protect and enhance existing parks, designated agricultural easement preserves, and drainage courses and identify sites for new parks. • Policy L96 Types of Uses in Open Space Land Use Designation - Typical uses in the Open Space land use designation include parks, pathways, storm drainage basins and water recharge areas, reservations for future freeway interchanges, areas designated for noise attenuation, and major landscape corridors along entryways into the city. While the Open Space designation is intended primarily for public agency use, private land may be designated Open Space. These would include land with storm drainage or other open space “easements” or private environmental or agricultural preserves. • Policy L97 Open Space Conversion - Prohibit conversion of land designated as Open Space to developed urban uses unless an overriding public purpose requires such a conversion.

2.1.6 High Speed Rail Policies
• Policy T82 Mitigation of High Speed Rail Impacts - If High Speed Rail becomes a reality in Kings County, ensure that financial, environmental, and agribusiness impacts of the project are mitigated for the citizens of Hanford.

2.2 Existing Conditions
The Plan Area is almost entirely classified as Farmland of Statewide Importance. Additionally, some parcels within the plan area are also under California Land Conservation Act (Williamson Act) contracts. “Farmland of Statewide Importance” is land other than prime farmland with a combination of physical and chemical characteristics advantageous for producing food, feed, forage, and fiber. The Williamson Act commits a parcel to agricultural production for a 10-year period, during which time no conversion out of agricultural use is permitted. In return, the land is taxed at a rate that is based on actual use (i.e., agricultural production), as opposed to its unrestricted market value. These contracts can be canceled consistent with the requirements in the Act.1 The two areas of the site under Williamson act contracts are a small parcel at the corner of Grangeville Boulevard and 7th Street and a stretch of parcels between Grangeville Boulevard and the Cross Valley Corridor (CVC) track area.
1 California Department of Conservation. Williamson Act Program. Accessed August 26, 2025. https://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/lca/.

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 4 Constraints Analysis September 2025
Under the General Plan, the Plan Area was classified as an “Area of Interest” which did not have specified land use designations, but was planned for a change of land use from agricultural to other land uses. This was determined to be a Significant Unavoidable Impact on agricultural land resources.

Agricultural Resources in the project area can be seen in Figures 1 and 2 below.

2.3 Potential Agricultural Resource Issues Resulting from Development Within the Plan Area
Environmental impacts for agricultural resources are based on the following thresholds of significance:
• Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use; • Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract;
As stated above, the General Plan 2035 EIR determined that development under the plan, including within the Plan Area would result in a Significant and Unavoidable Impact to Farmland of Statewide Importance. All future development in the vicinity of the General Plan and Plan Area would be subject to review in separate environmental documents, where a Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) Model may be required. This model would provide a numeric threshold for determining significance under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of impacts on conversion of mapped farmland to non-agricultural uses.

Prior to future development, any land under a Williamson Act land use contract would have to file a notice of non-renewal or cancellation and go through the necessary process. Future development could result in conflicts with Williamson Act land use contracts because proposed urban land uses are not compatible with such contracts and impacts would be significant and unavoidable.

(VUL 1$6$ 1*$ 86*6 )(0$ 6RXUFHV
 (VUL 7RP7RP *DUPLQ )$2
12$$ 86*6 ‹ 2 6 0 LE G K *,6 8 & L
&DOLIRUQLD&RXQW\%RXQGDULHV
0RVW5HFHQW
3ULPH)DUPODQG
)DUPODQGRI6WDWHZLGH,PSRUWDQFH
8QLTXH)DUPODQG
*UD]LQJ/DQG
&RQILQHG$QLPDO$JULFXOWXUH
1RQDJULFXOWXUDORU1DWXUDO9HJHWDWLRQ
9DFDQWRU'LVWXUEHG/DQG
5XUDO5HVLGHQWLDO/DQG
6HPLDJULFXOWXUDODQG5XUDO&RPPHUFLDO/DQG
8UEDQDQG%XLOW8S/DQG
:RUOGB+LOOVKDGH
  PL
  NP
Project Area 0 .5 1 


 2 Miles
CALIFORNIA IMPORTANT FARMLAND FINDER FIGURE 1

Source: Quad Knopf, July 2016.
0 2,500
Feet
5,000 Williamson Act
Planned Area
Study Area
Project Area
WILLIAMSON ACT MAP FIGURE 2

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 7 Constraints Analysis September 2025
Prior to development in the Williamson Act controlled parcels, proper cancelation procedures would need to be followed, which could result in some delays in project approvals.

The Plan as proposed would include 55-acres, across several planned areas, of agricultural inclusive uses which would partially replace the land removed that supported agricultural resources. This would not represent a substantive loss of Farmland of Statewide Importance, which may not be mitigatable.

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 8 Constraints Analysis September 2025
Section 3.0 Air Quality
Development of the Plan Area would require construction activities and would result in new uses that would generate air quality pollutants in the City. These new projects could result in air quality impacts in the air basin.

3.1 Relevant City Policies

3.1.1 Heavy Industrial Policy
• Policy L91 Incompatible Adjacent Land Uses - Prohibit the establishment of Residential and other sensitive land uses near Heavy Industrial land use designations.

3.1.2 Air Quality Management
• Policy AQ 4.1: Assess and mitigate project air quality impacts using analysis methods and significance thresholds recommended by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District • Policy AQ 4.2: Assess and mitigate project greenhouse gas/climate change impacts using analysis methods and significance thresholds as defined or recommended by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District.
• Policy AQ 4.3: Ensure that air quality and climate change impacts identified during California Environmental Quality Act review are minimized and consistently and fairly mitigated to the greatest extent feasible.
• Policy AQ 4.7: Work with the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District to ensure implementation of particulate emission controls required by Regulation VIII – Fugitive PM10 for construction and grading activities.

3.1.3 Hazardous Emissions and Public Health
• Policy AQ 8.1: Locate residential development projects and projects categorized as sensitive receptors an adequate distance from existing and potential sources of hazardous emissions such as major transportation corridors, industrial sites, and hazardous material locations. • Policy AQ 8.2: Locate new air pollution point sources such as, but not limited to, industrial, manufacturing, and processing facilities an adequate distance from residential areas and other sensitive receptors.
• Policy AQ 9.2: Require all access roads, driveways, and parking areas serving new commercial and industrial development are constructed with materials that minimize particulate emissions and are appropriate to the scale and intensity of use. • Policy AQ 9.3: Develop a street cleaning and soil track-out cleanup program to reduce PM10 emissions from City maintained roads to the maximum extent feasible.

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 9 Constraints Analysis September 2025

3.1.4 Relationship of Health to Land Use Patterns and Parks Access Policies
• Policy H68 New Growth Areas - Encourage a land use pattern, density, and mix of uses in new growth areas that minimize the number of vehicle miles traveled and support viable choices for public transit, bicycling, and walking.
• Policy H69 Separation between Incompatible Land Uses and Residential Neighborhoods - Maintain a separation between uses that are incompatible with residential neighborhoods.

3.2 Existing Conditions
The Plan Area is primarily utilized for agricultural activities and industrial uses, with scattered residential uses. The air basin around the Plan Area is controlled by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD), which has put in place compliance goals to meet state and federal requirements for air quality. The San Joaquin Valley is in Nonattainment for Ozone and Particulate Matter (PM10 and PM2.5), which is predominately from dust blown from open fields or roadways. Local and regional farm operation contribute about 14 percent of PM10 in the Air Basin. 2 To reduce issues associated with these contaminants the SJVAPCD has the following rules for development in the City of Hanford:
• Regulation VIII (Fugitive PM10 Prohibitions) – This regulation is comprised of Rules 8011 through 8081 which are made to reduce PM10 emissions such as dust and dirt, generated by human activity. This includes construction and demolition activities, road construction, materials storage, paved and unpaved roads, and dirt carried out by the construction vehicles.
• Rule 8021 (Construction, Demolition, Excavation, and Other Earthmoving Activities) – This Rule requires construction projects to submit a Dust Control Plan if a non-residential project disturbs a surface of more than five acres or more. These plans would be submitted to the SJVAPCD.
• Rule 4641 (Cutback, Slow Cure, and Emulsified Asphalt, Paving, and Maintenance Operations) – Requires development using asphalt in paving operations to use cutback, slow cure, or emulsified asphalt for paving operations.

The General Plan EIR determined that through compliance with SJVAPCD policies and regulations the short-term construction impacts associated with build-out of the General Plan would be required for development in the City.
2 City of Hanford. General Plan 2035 Draft EIR. July 2016.

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 10 Constraints Analysis September 2025

3.3 Potential Air Quality Issues Resulting from
Development Within the Plan Area

3.3.1 Construction Impacts
Projects in the Plan Area would result in the release of construction criteria pollution emissions as well as PM10, PM2.53, and diesel particulate matter (DPM) which are classified as toxic air contaminants (TACs). This would cumulatively contribute to existing air quality issues in the Air Basin, however impacts would be a temporary condition during each development action. Since the area is in non-attainment with state and federal particulate standards, future projects would be required to comply with Rule 8011, 8021, and 8071 of the SJVAPCD. These rules require measures to capture particulate matter during construction. Additionally, all roadways would need to be watered down and all access roads and parking areas for construction vehicles would require an asphaltconcrete pavement.

Further, the following measures from the Guide for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts (GAMAQI) are required for all new development under the General Plan:
• All disturbed areas, including storage piles, which are not being actively utilized for construction purposes, shall be effectively stabilized of dust emissions using water, chemical stabilizer/suppressant, covered with a tarp or other suitable cover or vegetative ground cover.
• All on-site unpaved roads and off-site unpaved access roads shall be effectively stabilized of dust emissions using water or chemical stabilizer/suppressant. • All land clearing, grubbing, scraping, excavation, land leveling, grading, cut and fill, and demolition activities shall be effectively controlled of fugitive dust emissions utilizing application of water or by presoaking.
• With the demolition of buildings up to six stories in height, all exterior surfaces of the building shall be wetted during demolition.
• When materials are transported offsite, all material shall be covered, or effectively wetted to limit visible dust emissions, and at least six inches of freeboard space from the top of the container shall be maintained.
• All operations shall limit or expeditiously remove the accumulation of mud or dirt from adjacent public streets at the end of each workday. The use of dry rotary brushes is expressly prohibited except where preceded or accompanied by sufficient wetting to limit the visible dust emissions. Use of blower devices is expressly forbidden. 3 PM10 and PM2.5 are primarily the result of dust generated by construction activities.

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 11 Constraints Analysis September 2025
• Following the addition of materials to, or the removal of materials from, the surface of outdoor storage piles, said piles shall be effectively stabilized of fugitive dust emissions utilizing sufficient water or chemical stabilizer/suppressant. • Within urban areas, track out shall be immediately removed when it extends 50 or more feet from the site and at the end of each workday.

Through the inclusion of these measures, construction of projects within the Plan Area would comply with City of Hanford air quality policies.

3.3.2 Operational Impacts
Development of the Plan Area could result in development of sites near existing areas that emit TACs. To avoid impacts with these emissions the developments within the Plan Area, the individual developments will have to comply with the following Mitigation Measures. These measures would protect new residents in the Plan Area from existing air quality issues in the area.

MM 4.3-1: Appropriate Siting of Sensitive Receptors
The City of Hanford shall require residential development projects and projects categorized as sensitive receptors to be located an adequate distance from existing and potential sources of toxic emissions such as freeways, major arterials, industrial sites, and hazardous material locations. In addition, the City of Hanford should require new air pollution point sources such as, but not limited to, industrial, manufacturing, and processing facilities to be located an adequate distance from residential areas and other sensitive receptors (Included in the Table on page 4.3-38 of the General Plan Update Draft EIR).

MM 4.3-2 Appropriate Siting of Sensitive Receptors
Future Development and infrastructure projects that are similar in nature to freeways and hightraffic roads, distribution centers, rail yards, refineries, chrome platers, dry cleaners, and gasoline dispensing facilities shall require assessment to determine whether sensitive receptors would be exposed to TACs. The City of Hanford shall require or perform air toxic risk assessments to determine air toxic impacts on an as-needed basis.

3.3.3 Odors
Development of the Plan Area would require some new uses to be located next to existing industrial areas or agricultural uses that are associated with odors that could adversely affect new residents.

The development in the Plan Area would be required to comply with the following Mitigation Measure from the General Plan EIR which would analyze and condition projects near high odor areas.

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 12 Constraints Analysis September 2025
MM 4.3-3 Odors Assessment
The City of Hanford shall require an assessment of new and existing odor sources for future land use development projects to determine whether sensitive receptors would be exposed to objectional odors and apply recommended applicable mitigation measures as defined by the SJVAPCD and best practices. Additionally, the City shall require conditions related to Conditional Use Permit approval associated with odors when necessary and on a case-by-case basis.

3.3.4 Cumulative Impacts
In addition to these project level impacts; a cumulative analysis should be prepared for the Plan Area to consider the increases in emissions from the totality of the development effort. This should be compared to Air District thresholds and policies to determine the extent of increases.

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 13 Constraints Analysis September 2025
Section 4.0 Biological Resources
The proposed project would redevelop approximately 563 acres within the City of Hanford, predominately occupied by agricultural land. Development of this area would require environmental analysis, under CEQA, including an assessment of biological impacts.

4.1 Relevant City Policies

4.1.1 Natural Habitat Policies
• Policy O30 Provision of Open Space Areas - Preserve and enhance natural open space areas. • Policy O31 Wetland and Riparian Corridors - Where appropriate and feasible, establish permanent mechanisms to protect wetlands and riparian corridors. • Policy O32 Vernal Pools: Identify and protect vernal pools that may be located in the Planning Area
• Policy O33 Recreation and Sensitive Habitat - Avoid the potential negative impacts of increased human activity on sensitive habitat areas when establishing new recreational facilities or programs.
• Policy O34 Impacts from Development - Ensure that potential impacts to biological resources and sensitive habitat are carefully evaluated when considering development projects.
• Policy O35 Non-native Invasive Species - Manage or eliminate nonnative invasive species from City-owned property and open space.
• Policy O36 Mature Trees - Promote the preservation of existing mature trees and encourage the planting of appropriate shade trees in new developments. • Policy O37 Native Tree Species and Drought Tolerant Vegetation - Encourage the planting of native tree species and drought-tolerant vegetation.

4.1.2 Wildlife and Sensitive Species Policies
• Policy O38 Endangered Wildlife and Habitat - Establish programs in connection with environmental review processes to protect endangered wildlife and their habitats. • Policy O39 Sensitive Wildlife - Work with state, federal, and local agencies on the preservation of sensitive wildlife species in the City.

4.2 Existing Conditions
The core area of the City of Hanford is a low-density urban area surrounded by agricultural uses. The biological resources in the Plan Area were identified in the General Plan EIR, derived from United Stated Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and California Department of Wildlife (CDFW) databases

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 14 Constraints Analysis September 2025
for habitat and species distribution. The primary biological resources within the Plan Area are trees which may provide habitat for birds, and open, undeveloped areas which may provide habitat for plant and animal species since they are not developed. A majority of the undeveloped areas in the Plan Area are utilized for agriculture and would be considered disturbed or low-quality habitat for native species.

4.2.1 Protected Plant and Animal Species
The Plan Area does not have designated habitat areas under the USFWS or CDFW jurisdiction. The General Plan EIR identified seven special-status plants and 25 special-status wildlife species within the City of Hanford boundaries. Figure 4.4-2 of the General Plan EIR identified Swainson’s Hawk as a potential species of concern within the Plan Area.

4.2.2 Wetlands
The Plan Area does not have any riparian areas or other undisturbed aquatic habitat areas. Based on a review of the National Wetlands Inventory, the Plan Area contains one freshwater pond wetland, approximately 1,100 feet northwest of the intersection of Lacey Boulevard and Highway 43.4 The location of this wetland area can be seen in Figure 3 below.

4.3 Potential Biological Issues Resulting from
Development Within the Plan Area
Development of the CVC would require removal of trees which may provide habitat for protected bird species, including Swainson’s Hawk. In accordance with the General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure 4.4-1, future development would be required to prepare biological assessments and perform preconstruction surveys to determine if species are present. The mitigation would identify species of bird present in development areas and provide guidance on buffers and avoidance measures to reduce impacts on these species. This would ensure active nests are preserved. 4 United States Fish and Wildlife Service. National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Viewer. Accessed September 5, 2025.

Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
Estuarine and Marine Wetland
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond
Lake
Other
Riverine
Wetlands
1:47,886
0 .4 .8 1.6 Miles Project Area
WETLANDS IN PLAN AREA FIGURE 3

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 16 Constraints Analysis September 2025
Development in the Plan Area would have the potential to impact one wetland area classified as a freshwater habitat wetland area. In the event that wetlands are encountered, the General Plan EIR includes Mitigation Measure 4.4-2 requiring a biological assessment featuring wetland delineation in areas with these resources. Any mitigation or offsets required for these areas would require coordination with the Army Corps of Engineers and CDFW.

Removal of trees would be required to comply with the tree removal and replacement policies required by the City of Hanford, including Chapter 12.12 Street Trees and Shrubs of the Municipal Code.

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 17 Constraints Analysis September 2025
Section 5.0 Cultural Resources
The proposed project would redevelop approximately 563 acres within the City of Hanford, predominately occupied by agricultural land. Development of this area would require environmental analysis, under CEQA, including an assessment of cultural and historical impacts.

5.1 Relevant City Policies

5.1.1 Historic Properties Policies
• Policy L9 - Maintain the historic downtown as the physical center of the community. • Policy L134 - Encourage the conservation and/or restoration of existing structures with recognized historical value.
• Policy O40 - Continue to preserve historic resources by delineating historic preservation districts and requiring design review of proposals affecting historic buildings. • Policy O41 - Encourage the rehabilitation, restoration, and reconstruction of designated historic structures in the Downtown.
• Policy O43 - Adopt flexible land use and design standards to allow the adaptive reuse of historic buildings with a variety of economically viable uses, while minimizing impacts to the historic value and character of sites and structures.
• Policy O44 - Promote the use of the State Historic Building Code to facilitate the reuse and conversion of historic buildings to alternative uses.
• Policy O47 - Consult with the California Archaeological Inventory Southern San Joaquin Valley at California State University, Bakersfield about potential cultural sites on projects that could have an impact on cultural resources.
• Policy O48 - Halt construction at a development site if cultural resources are encountered unexpectedly during construction.

5.1.2 Archeological Policies
• Policy O45 - Consult with appropriate Native American associations about potential archaeological sites in the beginning stages of the development review process. • Policy O46 - Require archaeological studies by a certified archeologist in areas of archeological potential significance prior to approval of development projects. • Policy O47 - Consult with the California Archaeological Inventory Southern San Joaquin Valley at California State University, Bakersfield about potential cultural sites on projects that could have an impact on cultural resources.
• Policy O48 - Halt construction at a development site if cultural resources are encountered unexpectedly during construction.

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 18 Constraints Analysis September 2025

5.2 Existing Conditions

5.2.1 Archaeological Resources
According to the General Plan 2035 Draft EIR, prior to 1939, few archeological resources were identified in the City of Hanford. Since then, resources have been discovered associated with the Native American tribes that previously occupied the Hanford region. Many of these resources are connected to the sloughs which passed through the region. The most recent of these deposits were found along Grangeville Boulevard and within the Mussel Slough.

During the General Plan process, consultation with the Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokuts Tribe identified that tribal cultural resources could be present in shallow deposits in areas where historic sloughs were located. Historic slough pathways would represent sensitive areas for these resources.

Other historic archaeological resources associated with prior development in the City of Hanford was discovered in 1993, specifically in the area along the railroad corridor leading to Armona.

5.2.2 Historic Structures
Historic structures in the City of Hanford are primarily focused in the downtown area. These structures include:
• 7040 Lacey Boulevard (1926-27 Craftsman-style residence) • 832 Grangeville Boulevard (1940 Vernacular style residence with some Craftsman elements) • 609N N. 10th Avenue (circa 1940 Minimal Traditional residence • 625 N. 10th Avenue (circa 1920 Vernacular-style church) • 8810 12th Avenue (1960 Ranch-style residence)
• 8880 12th Avenue (1942 Ranch-style residence)
• 8951 12th Avenue (1952 No style/Spanish eclectic? Residence) • 9075 12th Avenue (1962 Dutch Colonial-style First Lutheran Church) • 9439 12th Avenue (1957 Ranch-style residence)
• 9501 12th Avenue (1957 Ranch-style residence)
• Hill Street Water Tank #3 (1947)
The only identified historic resource within the Plan Area is the house located at 7040 Lacey Boulevard.

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 19 Constraints Analysis September 2025

5.3 Potential Cultural Issues Resulting from Development Within the Plan Area
Development in the Plan Area would require the demolition of structures and excavation for underground utilities and/or parking. Disturbance of soil within the Plan Area would have the potential to uncover previously unrecorded historic and prehistoric archeological resources. General Plan Polices O45-O48, condition development within the City of Hanford to:
• Consult with appropriate Native American associations about potential archaeological sites in the beginning stages of the development review process. • Require archaeological studies by a certified archeologist in areas of archeological potential significance prior to approval of development projects. • Consult with the California Archaeological Inventory Southern San Joaquin Valley at California State University, Bakersfield about potential cultural sites on projects that could have an impact on cultural resources.
• Halt construction at a development site if cultural resources are encountered unexpectedly during construction.

These measures would be required for development within the Plan Area to mitigate impacts on archeological resources.

Demolition of any potentially historic structure (structures greater than or equal to 50 years old) within the Plan Area would require a Department of Parks and Recreation Form (DPR Form) and Historic Resources Evaluation to be prepared by a historic resources professional. This document would classify and identify any structures to determine if they are eligible for listing as a federal, state, or local historic resource. If a structure is identified as eligible for listing as a historic resource, the project would be required to comply with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. If full demolition of a historic resource is proposed, the development would require an Environmental Impact Report as demolition would constitute a Significant Unavoidable Impact.

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 20 Constraints Analysis September 2025
Section 6.0 Geology and Soils
Development of the Plan Area would construct structures on land currently utilized for agricultural purposes. This would potentially require building techniques to stabilize unstable areas and could place new residents in area where geologic activity may occur.

6.1 Relevant City Policies

6.1.1 Soils Policy
• Policy O11 - Require new development to implement measures to minimize soil erosion related to construction.

6.1.2 Water Pollution Prevention Policy
• Policy O29 - Implement the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Permit and, for those properties exempt from the Permit, require a storm water pollution prevention plan, including use of best management practices, to control erosion and sedimentation during construction.

6.1.3 Health, Safety, and Noise Element
• Goal H3 - Reduced risk to public health and safety and disruption of social, economic, and environmental welfare resulting from natural hazards.

6.1.4 Earthquake Policies
• Policy H15 - Maintain and enforce current buildings codes and standards to reduce the potential for structural failure caused by ground shaking and other geologic hazards. • Policy H17 - Require geologic and soils studies to identify potential hazards as part of the approval process for all new development prior to grading activities where questionable conditions exist.

6.2 Existing Conditions
There are no geological hazards, such as landslide areas, fault rupture hazards, liquefaction zones, or unstable landforms, or fault areas within or near the City of Hanford. The Plan Area is not within a seismic hazard area.5
5 USGS. U.S. Geological Survey Quaternary Faults Map. August 26, 2025.

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 21 Constraints Analysis September 2025
Soils within the Plan Area consist primarily of Kimberlina fine sandy loam, saline-alkali. This soil is a fine sandy loam well suited for agriculture and normally associated with alluvial plains. Liquefaction potential in this area is low and only expected in the unlikely event of seismic activity coupled with a storm that severely saturates soils.6
Alluvial soils have the potential to be instable and have a risk of collapse if buildings are constructed on top of them, depending on specific soil composition and structure. Site specific study would be required to identify if these conditions were present on a given site.

6.3 Potential Geology and Soils Issues Resulting from
Development Within the Plan Area
Policy O11 of the General Plan requires new development to implement measures to minimize soil erosion related to construction and Policy O29 requires implementation of the NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activities (General Permit). The NPDES requirements apply to any development disturbing more than one acre of soil. For those properties exempt from the General Permit (No. 2012-0006-DWQ), a storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP), including use of best management practices (BMPs), to control erosion and sedimentation during construction would be required.

In addition, adherence to the Hanford Municipal Code, particularly Chapter 15.55 (Grading), and the CBC, along with the plan check and development review process would assist in the development of proper erosion control during construction. Compliance with NPDES requirements, applicable City General Plan policies, as well as the Hanford Municipal Code, and the CBC would ensure that future development within the Plan Area would not result in substantial erosion or loss of topsoil during construction.

Development in the Plan Area could be constructed on unstable soils or exposed to seismic shaking from faults around the City of Hanford, more specifically the San Andreas Fault approximately 44 miles west. Future development would be required to adhere to Hanford Municipal Code and CBC requirements as well as future development-specific geotechnical and soil studies to address potential subsidence issues or other ground failures related to seismic ground shaking. Future development plans and technical reports would be reviewed and approved by the City Building Division on a case-by-case basis to ensure that hazards arising from subsidence, ground failure, and seismic activity would be minimized to the extent practicable. 6 United States Department of Agriculture. Custom Soil Resource Report for Kings County, California. Web Soil Survey. August 26, 2025

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 22 Constraints Analysis September 2025
Section 7.0 Hazards and Hazardous Conditions
The development of the Plan Area would disturb soil and potentially expose workers and residents to hazards and hazardous conditions.

7.1 Relevant City Policies

7.1.1 Hazardous Materials and Toxic Waste Policies
• Policy H30 Industrial Hazardous Materials - Require industrial uses that rely extensively on the use of hazardous materials to adopt an acceptable use, storage, disposal, and emergency response program that has been approved by appropriate agencies. • Policy H31 Adequate Separation from Sensitive Uses - Require adequate separation between industrial areas where hazardous materials are present and sensitive uses such as schools, residential areas, parks, and public facilities.
• Policy H32 Project Review Evaluation - Evaluate the risks involving the disposal, transport, manufacture, storage and handling of hazardous material in Hanford in the project review process.
• Policy H34 Sensitive Receptors - Avoid siting uses with new sensitive receptors near existing industrial facilities that use or produce hazardous material or may emit toxic air contaminants.

7.1.2 Hazardous Waste Transport Policies
• Policy H36 Transport of Hazardous Materials - Promote the safe transport of hazardous materials through Hanford by designating hazardous material carrier routes to direct hazardous materials away from populated and other sensitive areas, and prohibiting vehicles transporting hazardous materials from parking on City streets. Coordinate with the California Highway Patrol to maintain designated travel routes through the Hanford Area for vehicles transporting hazardous materials.

7.1.3 Brownfields Policies
• Policy H37 Property Clean Up - Ensure that hazardous materials are cleaned up before a property is developed or redeveloped.

7.2 Existing Conditions
The Plan Area is located approximately 1.6 miles northeast of the nearest airport, Hanford Municipal Airport. Based on the Hanford Airport Master Plan, the Plan Area would not fall within a noise or safety contours defined for the Airport.

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 23 Constraints Analysis September 2025
Based on a review of the Cortese List, there is one closed cleanup case on the Envirostor database and two closed cleanup cases on the Geotracker database. Cases may not be reported or may be unknown in the project area in addition to these three known cases. These sites can be seen on Figures 4 and 5 below.

The Plan Area has been used as agriculture land for many years and, as a result, the use of pesticides and other chemicals would have accumulated in the soils on these parcels. Additionally, any parcels with buildings constructed prior to 1980 have the potential to contain asbestos containing materials and lead based paint.

7.3 Potential Hazardous Conditions Issues Resulting from Development Within the Plan Area
As stated above, the project site is not within an area affected by airport operations, therefore, the airport would not be a constraint for the Plan Area.

All development within the Plan Area would require the preparation of Phase 1 environmental site assessment (ESA) to determine if hazardous conditions (i.e., soil and/or groundwater contamination, soil vapor) exist on the site that would represent hazards to construction workers, nearby receptors, and future residents. Depending on the findings of the Phase 1 ESA, site-specific soil and groundwater testing may also be required.

Project Area
ENVIROSTOR MAP FIGURE 4

Project Area
GEOTRACKER MAP FIGURE 5

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 26 Constraints Analysis September 2025
All projects requiring demolition of structures older than 1980 would be required to comply with OSHA regulations for the handling and disposal of materials such as lead and asbestos.

As noted above, if likely contamination is identified in the Phase 1 ESA, site-specific investigations may be necessary for sites within the Plan Area. Mitigation measures for hazardous conditions can include site remediation, vapor barriers, and soil management plans which would remove or reduce the hazards.

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 27 Constraints Analysis September 2025
Section 8.0 Hydrology and Water Quality
Construction in the Plan Area would disturb soil and could increase pollutants in runoff. Additionally, the new development would increase impervious surfaces, due to the loss of agricultural land, in the Plan Area which would increase runoff and potential flooding during storm events.

8.1 Relevant City Policies

8.1.1 Water Conservation Policies
• Policy O24 Recharge Basins - Protect existing groundwater recharge basins and natural and manmade sloughs and seek the establishment of new basins within and around Hanford.

8.1.2 Water Pollution Prevention Policies
• Policy O29 Storm Water Pollution Prevention - Implement the NPDES Stormwater Permit and for those properties exempt from the Permit, require a storm water pollution prevention plan, including use of best management practices, to control erosion and sedimentation during construction.

8.1.3 Water Supply and Treatment Facilities Policies
• Policy P4 Groundwater Management Program - Work cooperatively with other water management agencies to prepare a groundwater management program as needed to ensure sufficient water supply for new growth identified in the land use element. • Policy P5 Groundwater Recharge - When necessary and practical, cooperate with other water agencies to acquire water for the recharge, replenishment and/or banking of groundwater for future demand.

8.1.4 Flood Policies
• Policy H20 New Development Requirements for Flood Protection - Require new development to provide onsite drainage or contribute towards their fair share cost of off-site drainage facilities to handle surface runoff.
• Policy H21 Stormwater System Maintenance - Provide ongoing stormwater maintenance activities such as routine inspections, cleaning, and preventive repairs.

8.2 Existing Conditions
The existing Plan Area is relatively pervious due to the primarily rural land uses, and allows for rainwater to naturally infiltrate into the soil and recharge groundwater basins. The Plan Area does

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 28 Constraints Analysis September 2025
not feature any rivers or natural water bodies experiencing pollution or runoff. The Plan Area is within an area of minimal flood hazard and would not be expected to experience a 100-year storm flood event.
7 The entire City of Hanford, including the Plan Area, is within the Pine Flat Dam Inundation Area.

According to the General Plan, the City’s water resources are managed by the Kings County Water District (KCWD). As the Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA), Mid-Kings River GSA manages water supplies within the Tulare Lake Subbasin, including the Mid-Kings River Subarea, which is used for City’s water supply. Under the proposed General Plan development predictions, the City of Hanford would result in a greater demand for groundwater; however, formation of the GSA was determined to reduce groundwater consumption for the City of Hanford to comply with water conservation policies. The Plan Area does not contain specified groundwater recharge areas such as canals or other drainage features.8

8.3 Potential Hydrology and Water Quality Issues
Resulting from Development Within the Plan Area
Development of the Plan Area would require disturbance of soil during construction which would release sediment that would be captured by runoff and end up in waterways around the City. All future development would be required to comply with General Permit Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ during construction which includes BMPs to capture sediment before it is released in runoff. This would prevent the release of pollutants into waterways during construction.

New development would also be required to implement appropriate Minimum Control Measures and design standards in compliance with the Phase II General Permit as outlined in the Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP); as well as the City’s grading plan and site development requirements. To comply with these requirements, new development would have to incorporate BMPs and adhere to design standards to maximize the reduction of pollutant loading in runoff to the maximum extent practicable. Following standard processes, the City Building Division would review and approve grading plans and site development requirements for each new development on a case-by-case basis.

Development in the Plan Area would place more development within existing floodplains and an area of potential dam inundation. The risk of these flooding events is low so the new development would not be expected to conflict with floodplain or flood hazard conditions. Additionally, runoff from the Plan Area would result in more pollutants entering stormwater so LID measures would be required for development to filter this runoff.
7 FEMA. FEMA FIRM Viewer. Accessed September 17, 2025.
https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search?AddressQuery=hamblin%2C%20CA. 8 City of Hanford. General Plan 2035 Draft EIR. July 2016.

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 29 Constraints Analysis September 2025
Infiltration of groundwater into the soil would be reduced by future development because the total surface area of impervious surfaces within the Plan Area would be expected to increase.

Implementation of drainage basins and low impact design features would, however, facilitate water running off the impervious surfaces to be absorbed into the ground instead of directly entering the storm drain system. Additionally, the KCWD has multiple projects to improve groundwater recharge throughout the City which would provide more infiltration area for the new development I the Plan Area.

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 30 Constraints Analysis September 2025
Section 9.0 Noise and Vibration
Development of the Plan Area would require construction activities and would result in new sources of noise in the City. These new projects could result in noise impacts resulting from new traffic or stationary noise sources on-site.

9.1 Relevant City Policies

9.1.1 Construction Noise Ordinances
• Construction or Repair of Buildings, Excavation of Streets and Highways. The construction, demolition, alteration or repair of any building or the excavation of streets and highways other than between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. In cases of emergency, construction or repair noises are exempt from this provision. In non-emergency situations, the city manager, or designee, may issue a permit, upon application, if the city manager, or designee, determines that the public health and safety, is affected by loud and raucous noise caused by construction or repair of buildings or excavation of streets and highways between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. will not be impaired, and if the city manager, or designee, further determines that loss or inconvenience would otherwise result. The permit shall grant permission in non-emergency cases for a period of not more than three days. The permit may be renewed once for a period of three days or less. • Commercial Establishments Adjacent to Residential Property. Unreasonably loud and raucous noise from the premises of any commercial establishment, including any outdoor area which is part of or under the control of the establishment, between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., which is plainly audible at any residential property or noise sensitive institution and which is not exempt per Section 9.10.070(K). • Noises, sounds, commotions, and vibrations at levels normally associated with activities occurring at or in proximity to residences which occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and which are considered by a reasonable person to be ordinary, usual, and/or incidental to residential activity that do not unreasonably disturb the peace and comfort of adjacent properties.

9.1.2 Major Noise Source Policies
• Policy H40 Ground Transportation Noise - Limit the effects of vehicle noise generation by designating truck routes, limiting vehicle speeds, standards relating to vehicle noise emission levels and muffler systems.
• Policy H41 Interior Noise Exposure - Adopt State Noise Insulation Standards (California Code of Regulations, Title 24) and Chapter 35 of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) concerning interior noise exposure for new single, multifamily housing, hotels and motels.

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 31 Constraints Analysis September 2025
• Policy H42 Noise Evaluation for New Development Evaluate proposed development proposals against existing and future noise levels from ground transportation noise sources.

9.1.3 Noise Exposure Policies
• Policy H45 Minimizing Noise for Residences in Mixed-use Developments - Require mixed-use projects to minimize noise exposure within the indoor areas of residential areas through design and construction techniques such as separating residential space from mechanical equipment, loading bays, and parking lots, and through management and operating procedures.
• Policy H48 Noise Mitigation for Construction Activities - Require all development projects to mitigate noise impacts associated with construction activities.

9.1.4 Noise-sensitive Land Use Policies
• Policy H49 Acoustical Analysis - The City shall utilize procedures for project review and issuance of building permits to ensure that noise mitigation measures identified in an acoustical analysis are implemented in the project design. • Policy H50 Sound Walls - Utilize sound walls at the perimeter of new residential developments to protect from noise generated by transportation corridors. • Policy H51 Noise from Trains - Limit the effects of excessive train noise to existing and future noise sensitive land uses within proximity to the railroad corridors.

9.2 Existing Conditions
Noise levels in the Plan Area vary substantially depending on how close to roadways and other noise sources structures are located. Noise levels directly adjacent to the roadways in the project area could result in noise levels up to 80 decibels averaged hourly. A majority of the Plan Area experiences noise levels below 60 decibels.9
The Plan Area is not within the direct flight path or elevated noise levels resulting from airport operations of the Hanford Municipal Airport.
9 City of Hanford. General Plan 2035 Draft EIR. July 2016.

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 32 Constraints Analysis September 2025

9.3 Potential Noise and Vibration Issues Resulting from Development Within the Plan Area

9.3.1 Construction Noise and Vibration
The development of the Plan Area would result in construction noise and vibration. Future projects would be required to study and mitigate impacts from construction on nearby existing uses consistent with Policy H48 of the General Plan. All construction noise would be a temporary condition and would not result in a permanent increase in ambient noise levels within the Plan Area.

Additionally, consistent with the City Ordinances the construction noise and vibration occurring between 7:00am and 10:00pm are considered acceptable within the City. Therefore, construction between these times would not conflict with City policies.

9.3.2 Operational Noise and Vibration
The General Plan EIR concluded that development consistent with the 2035 General Plan would not result in ambient noise increases exceeding three decibels, which is the Caltrans perceptible noise threshold. Development of the Plan Area would potentially place residential uses in areas that are adjacent to high volume roadways, industrial areas, and railways. Consistent with General Plan policies, new development would be required to include noise insulation to reduce noise from vehicles on roadways, mitigate noise from non-transportation sources (such as mechanical equipment for heating and cooling), and evaluate potential sources of noise impacting new residents. These would represent non-CEQA issues for environmental analysis.

Therefore, new development would require Noise and Vibration studies on a project level to identify and reduce noise impacts within the Plan Area. CEQA documentation would vary depending on the individual projects in the Plan Area, however development near high noise areas may exceed adopted noise standards which would require site specific mitigation.

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 33 Constraints Analysis September 2025
Section 10.0 Transportation
Development of the Plan Area would result in a dense transit-oriented community in the eastern portion of the City of Hanford. This would include new modes of transportation and denser development than under current conditions.

10.1 Relevant City Policies

10.1.1 Economic Development and Employment Policies
• Policy E6 Transportation Connectivity - Enhance opportunities for economic development by pursuing greater regional transportation connectivity for people and goods through infrastructure improvements to railroads and highways.

10.1.2 Industry Policies
• Policy E22 Transportation Improvements - Aggressively advocate for enhancing transportation infrastructure in support of business growth in the Kings Industrial Park.

10.1.3 City Form Policies
• Policy L11 Infill Development - Support, encourage, and incentivize, to the extent possible, infill development projects that can effectively utilize existing transportation and utility infrastructure.

10.1.4 Residential Land Use Policies
• Policy L26 Residential Parking - Residential developments shall provide adequate on-site parking for the specific use.

10.1.5 Sustainable Development Policies
• Policy L108 Transit-Oriented Development - Support high-density transit oriented development within the City’s Downtown, Mixed Use Corridors, and at the intersections of major thoroughfares to improve transit ridership and to reduce automobile use, traffic congestion, and greenhouse gas emissions.

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 34 Constraints Analysis September 2025

10.1.6 Complete Neighborhood Policies
• Policy L117 Neighborhood Retail Goods and Services - Encourage the development and maintenance of compatible neighborhood retail and services within walking distance of residences as a means to promote the creation of “complete” neighborhoods.

10.1.7 Infill Development Policies
• Policy L135 Infill Development Support - Support, encourage and, to the extent possible, incentivize infill development projects that can effectively utilize existing transportation and utility infrastructure.

10.1.8 East Lacey Boulevard Corridor Area Policies
• Policy L141 East Lacey Boulevard Transformation of Auto-Oriented and Strip Commercial Uses - Support the transformation of auto-oriented and strip commercial uses into attractive pedestrian-oriented developments that frame and enhance the visual character of the East Lacey Boulevard corridor.
• Policy L144 East Lacey Boulevard Development Standards - Discourage new “strip" commercial development along East Lacey Boulevard from an overall community development perspective. Develop design policies and regulations that identify a minimum percentage of street facing building facades and minimize the exposure of parking along the street.
• Policy L145 East Lacey Boulevard Design Policies and Ordinances - Develop design policies and ordinances for mixed use development that provide for pedestrians and bicyclists including features such as street trees, buildings close to the street, de-emphasis of parking lots and garages, limitation of driveway cuts, traffic-calming features, clearly defined street crossings, adequate lighting, and street furnishings.

10.1.9 Hanford-Armona Road Corridor Area Policies
• Policy L149 Hanford-Armona Road Transformation of Auto-Oriented and Strip Commercial Uses - Support the transformation of auto-oriented and strip commercial uses into attractive pedestrian-oriented developments that frame and enhance the visual character of the Hanford-Armona Road Corridor.
• Policy L150 Hanford-Armona Road Boulevard Development Standards - Discourage new “strip" commercial development along Hanford-Armona Road from an overall community development perspective. Develop design policies and regulations that identify a minimum percentage of street facing building facades and minimize the exposure of parking along the street.
• Policy L151 Hanford-Armona Road Design Policies and Ordinances - Develop design policies and ordinances for mixed use development that provide for pedestrians and bicyclists

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 35 Constraints Analysis September 2025
including features such as street trees, buildings close to the street, de-emphasis of parking lots and garages, limitation of driveway cuts, traffic-calming features, clearly defined street crossings, adequate lighting, and street furnishings.

10.2 Existing Conditions
The Plan Area does not currently feature a significant transportation network. The primary roadways are rural roads without sidewalks and lacking bicycle infrastructure. Transit access is also limited and there are few bus stops.

Based on the VMT Thresholds and Implementation Guidelines prepared for the City of Hanford in November 2022, the Plan Area would likely have a residential VMT per capita of greater than 10.33.

This is a high VMT area for the City of Hanford, exceeding the average VMT per capita of 10.33. The employee VMT for the area would be 16.95 which is below the threshold of 19.48.

10.3 Potential Transportation Issues Resulting from
Development Within the Plan Area
The proposed Plan would provide development focused around High Speed Rail and the CVC train lines, in addition to providing dense transit-oriented development in eastern Hanford. Although the current VMT for the area would be high under existing conditions, the proposed Plan would provide local serving retail and transit-oriented development which would reduce the average VMT for new development in the Plan Area. Additionally, the proposed Plan would improve different modes of transportation within the Plan Area and expand train and transit services provided in the City.

Therefore, the development of the Plan Area would be expected to result in a low VMT and development would not conflict with State VMT reduction policy.

The Plan Area would require new roadways and a grid network to serve the development. These roads would be planned and created in coordination with the City of Hanford Transportation Department to avoid hazardous roadway conditions. These roads would be required to comply with safety regulations and policies already in place in the City of Hanford.

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 36 Constraints Analysis September 2025
Section 11.0 Utilities and Public Services
Development in the Plan Area would increase the demand for public services and need for utilities to serve the additional residents and businesses.

11.1 Relevant City Policies

11.1.1 Residential Land Use Policies
• Policy L24 Availability of Infrastructure - Ensure that new residential developments have sufficient urban infrastructure and public facilities to accommodate the number and type of development being proposed.

11.1.2 Complete Neighborhood Policies
• Policy L111 Complete Neighborhoods - Promote efforts to make new and existing neighborhoods more complete by encouraging the development of a mix of complementary uses and amenities that meet the daily needs of residents. Such uses and amenities may include parks, community centers, religious institutions, daycare centers, libraries, schools, community gardens, and neighborhood commercial and mixed-use developments. • Policy L114 Services and Facilities - Include easily accessible services and facilities within each neighborhood to meet the daily needs of neighborhood residents. Most residents should live within a ½ mile walking distance of schools, parks and retail services.

11.1.3 Eastside Planning Area Policies
• Policy L159 Eastside Neighborhood Park - Plan for a new neighborhood park site with a flexible location south of Grangeville Boulevard and within a five- to ten- minute walk of most residents in the East Side Planning Area.
• Policy L160 Eastside Elementary School District Boundaries - Encourage formal discussions to review and potentially revise the elementary school district boundary between Hanford Elementary School District and Kit Carson Union Elementary School District.

11.1.4 Safe Routes to School Policies
• Policy T43 Safe Routes to Schools Programs - Promote Safe Routes to Schools programs for all schools serving the city.

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 37 Constraints Analysis September 2025

11.1.5 Neighborhood Park Policies
• Policy O56 Neighborhood Parks - Establish neighborhood parks generally between 2 and 5 acres in size at locations easily accessed by residents of the neighborhood. • Policy O57 Neighborhood Parks Service Area - Neighborhood parks shall have a general service area of approximately 1/2 mile radius, and situated to avoid patrons having to cross arterial streets, railroad lines and major waterways.

11.1.6 Law Enforcement Facility Policies
• Policy P34 Police Station - Provide for additional structures and acquire additional land as needed for an expanded police station with adequate police vehicle parking to maintain acceptable response times to meet new population growth. • Policy P37 Impact Fees for Police Facilities - Require new development to provide funding to meet the cost of providing vehicles, equipment, and structures, to meet the needs of new population growth.

11.1.7 Crime Prevention Program Policies
• Policy P38 Police Officer Ratio - Provide for adequate law enforcement officers and staffing needs to meet the new population growth.

11.1.8 Fire Protection and Emergency Services Facilities and Equipment Policies
• Policy P49 Emergency Service Response Times - Provide fire stations at locations to achieve and maintain an adequate response time for emergencies within the City. • Policy P51 Fire Station Locations - Provide for five City fire station locations within the 2035 Growth Boundary on the General Plan Land Use Map.
• Policy P52 Impact Fees for Fire Facilities - Require developers to contribute impact fees to fund the cost of providing fire facilities needed to support new population growth and development.

11.1.9 Elementary and Middle School Policies
• Policy P63 Educational Facilities Locations - Coordinate with school districts for them to locate and acquire school sites in new development areas. • Policy P64 Neighborhood Focal Points - Encourage elementary and middle schools sites be integrated into neighborhoods to be a focal point in the neighborhood and to encourage access via bicycling and walking.

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 38 Constraints Analysis September 2025

11.1.10 High School Policies
• Policy P66 Fourth High School Location - Strongly encourage that the future fourth high school site be located south of State Route 198.

11.2 Existing Conditions

11.2.1 Fire Protection Services
The General Plan included the need for two new Fire Stations to meet the demand of new residents created by the General Plan. The location of these stations would provide five-minute response times for the City. The Plan Area does not currently contain a fire station or other fire protection facilities.

11.2.2 Police Protection Services
The General Plan stated that the City of Hanford would require additional police services to meet public safety, including potentially larger facilities. There are no police facilities within the Plan Area.

11.2.3 School Facilities
The Plan Area does not contain school facilities. The General Plan states that development could require new facilities to support students. The Plan Area is currently served by the Hamilton Elementary School District and John F. Kennedy Junior High School. There are three high schools within the City of Hanford that could serve the Plan Area.

11.2.4 Utilities
The City of Hanford provides utilities services to the Plan Area including stormwater drainage, potable water, wastewater treatment, solid waste disposal, and energy.

11.3 Potential Public Services and Utilities Issues Resulting from Development Within the Plan Area
Development of the Plan Area would require additional services for residents and businesses including greater numbers of fire and police staff. All future development under the Plan would be required to pay development fees that would contribute to expanding the availability of public services to future residents. Additionally, as part of the development of new service centers, such as fire stations, services could be sited within the Plan Area to serve the new residents.

Although utilities would require expansion to serve the Plan Area, some densification of development within the Plan Area was assumed in the analysis of the General Plan EIR. The General

City of Hanford HSR TOD and CVC Project 39 Constraints Analysis September 2025
Plan EIR found that through planned expansion, development under the General Plan would have a less than significant impact under CEQA. Therefore, compliance with existing City policy in the Plan Area would not result in constraints on existing utilities systems.

Conceptual Cross Valley Corridor Service
Plan
November 7, 2025

Contents
Cross Valley Corridor | November 7, 2025 2
Background & Overview of Route 3
Planning Parameters
Conceptual Timetables & Stringlines
Potential Infrastructure Requirements
Next Steps
6 10
19 24

Contents
Cross Valley Corridor | November 7, 2025 3
Background & Overview of Route 3
Planning Parameters
Conceptual Timetables & Stringlines
Potential Infrastructure Requirements
Next Steps
6 10
19 24

This conceptual service plan advances the 2018 Cross Valley Corridor Plan • This document outlines a potential service plan, created in collaboration with Caltrans and the San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority (SJJPA), for the planned Cross Valley Corridor between Huron and Porterville, CA, along existing UPRR rail infrastructure and operated by San Joaquin Valley Railroad.
• This service plan supports further development of the conceptual regional passenger rail service studied in the 2018 Cross Valley Corridor Rail Plan and included in the California State Rail Plan as a long-term service goal. 4 • Service parameters, a conceptual operating schedule, and updating the list of conceptual infrastructure requirements are included in this service plan.
• The work completed in this task is intended to align with planning being completed by the Fresno Council of
Governments in a parallel regional rail study.

Source: 2018 Cross Valley Corridor Plan, Tulare County Association of Governments Cross Valley Corridor | November 7, 2025 Page 1012 of 1117 The Cross Valley Corridor rail service is envisioned to be built in two phases, and both will provide a key connection to High Speed Rail
• While the full route is envisioned as connecting from Huron to Porterville, the 2018 Plan described three potential phases, described below:
• Phase 1 would implement bus service on the Corridor.
• Phase 2 would implement rail service on an initial segment between Lemoore and Visalia. • Phase 3 would operate rail service on the full corridor between Huron and Porterville. • The conceptual service plan described in this document shows timetables for both Phase 2 and Phase 3. • It also important to note Cross Valley Corridor service is planned to connect with future High Speed Rail trains at Kings–Tulare. A future High Speed Rail schedule was obtained for this project to serve as the basis for connections and showed northbound trains departing Kings-Tulare at :06 and southbound trains departing at :56. If High Speed Rail timetables are revised, the Cross Valley Corridor service plan timetables should be updated to ensure connectivity between the two services. 5 Cross Valley Corridor | November 7, 2025
Rail segment constructed in Phase 2 of Cross Valley Corridor service Rail segment constructed in Phase 3 of Cross Valley Corridor service

Contents
Cross Valley Corridor | November 7, 2025 6
Background & Overview of Route 3
Conceptual Timetables & Stringlines
Potential Infrastructure Requirements
Next Steps
10 19
24 Planning Parameters 6

The project team held a series of meetings to establish service goals and parameters to enable timetable development
Planning Coordination • SJJPA, Caltrans, and the consulting team held a series of meetings from September to October 2025 to establish service goals and planning parameters to provide a framework while developing conceptual timetables.
• These parameters are detailed on the following pages.

Guiding Service Goals • Cross Valley Corridor service would prioritize convenient connections at Kings–Tulare to the future High Speed Rail station. A high-level demand analysis identified the strongest travel demand between Tulare County and Fresno County, highlighting the importance of linking the eastern section of Cross Valley Corridor to the north.
• Cross Valley Corridor service is envisioned as an hourly service. • The initial Phase 2 Cross Valley Corridor service concepts would be compatible with eventual Phase 3 full build.

Types of Planning
Parameters
• Service Parameters define the intended service characteristics. • Technical Parameters define the operating capabilities of the railroad.

Cross Valley Corridor | November 7, 2025 Page 1015 of 1117 7 Service parameters define what service levels and characteristics are required to support the service goals
8 Daily start and end of service
Scheduled headways
Prioritized Connections
Minimum Connection Time
Stopping Patterns
Total daily frequencies
Cross Valley Parameter Description
Start time: 5:30
End time: 22:30
California HSR
Consistent with the span of service
Hourly with consistent frequencies
One stopping pattern for all trips
10 Minutes
Service Parameters:

This was chosen as an approximate service span to provide robust service coverage, though final span of service will be influenced by equipment cycles and connections to High
Speed Rail.

The schedule was designed around hourly headways with
regular departure times in accordance with best scheduling practices.

To maximize regional connectivity, Cross Valley Corridor service was designed around the High Speed Rail schedules obtained for this project, aligning with planned departures at Kings–Tulare (:06 northbound, :56 southbound).

A minimum transfer time of 10 minutes at Kings-Tulare
station would allow a comfortable connection between
Cross Valley Corridor and High Speed Rail, potentially
accommodating a two-level transfer.

To provide an easily understandable service, a consistent stopping pattern was employed in the schedule, with all trains making all Cross Valley Corridor stops listed in the 2018 plan.

The number of daily frequencies in the proposed schedule is 18 in both directions, consistent with the service span and High Speed Rail connections.

Cross Valley Corridor | November 7, 2025 Page 1016 of 1117 Technical parameters define the capabilities of the railroad, equipment, and infrastructure to support the service goals
9 Rolling Stock Assumptions Zero-emissions multiple unit Dwell 1 minute
Recovery 10% runtime recovery distributed
throughout train run
Minimum Turn Time 15 minutes
Technical Parameters: Cross Valley Parameter Description Maximum Authorized Speed 79 MPH
Running times used specifications from a 4-car battery
powered zero-emissions multiple unit, supporting
compliance with state environmental standards.

Typical of passenger rail, the schedule assumed a 1-minute dwell time at each Cross Valley Corridor station, to account for trains stopping and passenger boarding and alighting.

Consistent with state practices, the runtime incorporated a 10% recovery throughout a train’s run to account for typical delays that occur in operation. However, additional runtime was added at key locations to account for specific features of Cross Valley Corridor, which are described later in this document.
15 minutes was assumed to be the minimum turn time for a train, which is the time required for a train to end its run and begin a new run in the opposite direction, aligning with practices on similar services.

Both 79MPH and 90MPH speeds were studied for this
project, though the project team concurred that a maximum speed of 79MPH would be used for the conceptual
schedules due to the marginal travel-time reduction at
90MPH.

Cross Valley Corridor | November 7, 2025 Page 1017 of 1117 Contents
Cross Valley Corridor | November 7, 2025 10
Background & Overview of Route 3
Planning Parameters
Potential Infrastructure Requirements
Next Steps
6 19
24 Conceptual Timetables & Stringlines 10

The conceptual timetables are presented in phases and allow for transfers to HighSpeed Rail at the Kings-Tulare Station • The timetables and accompanying stringlines on the following pages are shown in two phases of implementation, consistent with the 2018 Cross Valley Corridor Plan.
• The runtimes have been designed consistent with the parameters set in the previous section. However, supplemental runtime was added at the following locations:
• Between Kings Tulare and Visalia to account for potential speed reductions from curves in the right-of-way and also street running through downtown Visalia
• Between Visala and Farmersville to account for curves in the right-of-way • Between Farmersville and Exeter to account for curves in the right-of-way • Between Lindsay and Porterville to account for potential speed reductions running through downtown Porterville Cross Valley Corridor | November 7, 2025 11
Connection Transfer Minutes
Westbound CV to Northbound HSR 26
Westbound CV to Southbound HSR 16
Eastbound CV to Northbound HSR 44
Eastbound CV to Southbound HSR 34
Southbound HSR to Westbound CV 44
Southbound HSR to Eastbound CV 26
Northbound HSR to Westbound CV 34
Northbound HSR to Eastbound CV 16
• The Phases were designed to have the consistent directional connection times at Kings-Tulare Station between Cross Valley Corridor Service (CV) and the High-Speed Rail (HSR) schedule obtained for this project. Transfers minutes are described in the table on the right.

Stringlines demonstrate where infrastructure is required to accommodate train meets in this conceptual schedule
• Stringline charts assist in evaluating infrastructure needs, as they visualize train movements and show “meets”, or locations where trains are schedule to pass each other going opposite directions, thus requiring two tracks • The meet locations are highlighted in red on the following stringline charts. The stringlines show that the meet locations are as follows:
• Between Visalia and Kings-Tulare (Phases 2 & 3)
• Near NAS Lemoore (Phase 3)
• Near Exeter (Phase 3)
• It is important to note that the meet locations are specific to these timetables. If the timetables change as the project progresses, the meet locations likely will as well.

Cross Valley Corridor | November 7, 2025 Page 1020 of 1117 12 Phase 2 (Lemoore – Visalia) Conceptual Timetable
13 EASTBOUND
TRAIN NUMBER 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 LEMOORE 6:09 7:09 8:09 9:09 10:09 11:09 12:09 13:09 14:09 15:09 16:09 17:09 18:09 19:09 20:09 21:09 22:09 23:09 HANFORD 6:17 7:17 8:17 9:17 10:17 11:17 12:17 13:17 14:17 15:17 16:17 17:17 18:17 19:17 20:17 21:17 22:17 23:17 KINGS/TULARE-HSR 6:22 7:22 8:22 9:22 10:22 11:22 12:22 13:22 14:22 15:22 16:22 17:22 18:22 19:22 20:22 21:22 22:22 23:22 VISALIA 6:44 7:44 8:44 9:44 10:44 11:44 12:44 13:44 14:44 15:44 16:44 17:44 18:44 19:44 20:44 21:44 22:44 23:44

WESTBOUND
TRAIN NUMBER 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 VISALIA 5:18 6:18 7:18 8:18 9:18 10:18 11:18 12:18 13:18 14:18 15:18 16:18 17:18 18:18 19:18 20:18 21:18 22:18 KINGS/TULARE-HSR 5:40 6:40 7:40 8:40 9:40 10:40 11:40 12:40 13:40 14:40 15:40 16:40 17:40 18:40 19:40 20:40 21:40 22:40 HANFORD 5:45 6:45 7:45 8:45 9:45 10:45 11:45 12:45 13:45 14:45 15:45 16:45 17:45 18:45 19:45 20:45 21:45 22:45 LEMOORE 5:53 6:53 7:53 8:53 9:53 10:53 11:53 12:53 13:53 14:53 15:53 16:53 17:53 18:53 19:53 20:53 21:53 22:53 Cross Valley Corridor | November 7, 2025 Page 1021 of 1117 Phase 2 (Lemoore – Visalia) Conceptual Stringline
Cross Valley Corridor | November 7, 2025 14
Train meet location
(two tracks required)

Phase 2 (Lemoore – Visalia) Conceptual Stringline Continued Cross Valley Corridor | November 7, 2025 15
Train meet location
(two tracks required)

Phase 3 (Huron – Porterville) Conceptual Timetable
16 EASTBOUND
TRAIN NUMBER 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 HURON 5:48 6:48 7:48 8:48 9:48 10:48 11:48 12:48 13:48 14:48 15:48 16:48 17:48 18:48 19:48 20:48 21:48 22:48 NAS LEMOORE 5:59 6:59 7:59 8:59 9:59 10:59 11:59 12:59 13:59 14:59 15:59 16:59 17:59 18:59 19:59 20:59 21:59 22:59 LEMOORE 6:09 7:09 8:09 9:09 10:09 11:09 12:09 13:09 14:09 15:09 16:09 17:09 18:09 19:09 20:09 21:09 22:09 23:09 HANFORD 6:17 7:17 8:17 9:17 10:17 11:17 12:17 13:17 14:17 15:17 16:17 17:17 18:17 19:17 20:17 21:17 22:17 23:17 KINGS/TULARE-HSR 6:22 7:22 8:22 9:22 10:22 11:22 12:22 13:22 14:22 15:22 16:22 17:22 18:22 19:22 20:22 21:22 22:22 23:22 VISALIA 6:44 7:44 8:44 9:44 10:44 11:44 12:44 13:44 14:44 15:44 16:44 17:44 18:44 19:44 20:44 21:44 22:44 23:44 FARMERSVILLE 6:53 7:53 8:53 9:53 10:53 11:53 12:53 13:53 14:53 15:53 16:53 17:53 18:53 19:53 20:53 21:53 22:53 23:53 EXETER 7:01 8:01 9:01 10:01 11:01 12:01 13:01 14:01 15:01 16:01 17:01 18:01 19:01 20:01 21:01 22:01 23:01 0:01 LINDSAY 7:08 8:08 9:08 10:08 11:08 12:08 13:08 14:08 15:08 16:08 17:08 18:08 19:08 20:08 21:08 22:08 23:08 0:08 PORTERVILLE 7:19 8:19 9:19 10:19 11:19 12:19 13:19 14:19 15:19 16:19 17:19 18:19 19:19 20:19 21:19 22:19 23:19 0:19

WESTBOUND
TRAIN NUMBER 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 PORTERVILLE 4:43 5:43 6:43 7:43 8:43 9:43 10:43 11:43 12:43 13:43 14:43 15:43 16:43 17:43 18:43 19:43 20:43 21:43 LINDSAY 4:54 5:54 6:54 7:54 8:54 9:54 10:54 11:54 12:54 13:54 14:54 15:54 16:54 17:54 18:54 19:54 20:54 21:54 EXETER 5:02 6:02 7:02 8:02 9:02 10:02 11:02 12:02 13:02 14:02 15:02 16:02 17:02 18:02 19:02 20:02 21:02 22:02 FARMERSVILLE 5:09 6:09 7:09 8:09 9:09 10:09 11:09 12:09 13:09 14:09 15:09 16:09 17:09 18:09 19:09 20:09 21:09 22:09 VISALIA 5:18 6:18 7:18 8:18 9:18 10:18 11:18 12:18 13:18 14:18 15:18 16:18 17:18 18:18 19:18 20:18 21:18 22:18 KINGS/TULARE-HSR 5:40 6:40 7:40 8:40 9:40 10:40 11:40 12:40 13:40 14:40 15:40 16:40 17:40 18:40 19:40 20:40 21:40 22:40 HANFORD 5:45 6:45 7:45 8:45 9:45 10:45 11:45 12:45 13:45 14:45 15:45 16:45 17:45 18:45 19:45 20:45 21:45 22:45 LEMOORE 5:53 6:53 7:53 8:53 9:53 10:53 11:53 12:53 13:53 14:53 15:53 16:53 17:53 18:53 19:53 20:53 21:53 22:53 NAS LEMOORE 6:04 7:04 8:04 9:04 10:04 11:04 12:04 13:04 14:04 15:04 16:04 17:04 18:04 19:04 20:04 21:04 22:04 23:04 HURON 6:14 7:14 8:14 9:14 10:14 11:14 12:14 13:14 14:14 15:14 16:14 17:14 18:14 19:14 20:14 21:14 22:14 23:14 Cross Valley Corridor | November 7, 2025 Page 1024 of 1117 Phase 3 (Huron – Porterville) Conceptual Stringline
Cross Valley Corridor | November 7, 2025 17
Train meet location
(two tracks required)

Phase 3 (Huron – Porterville) Conceptual Stringline Continued Cross Valley Corridor | November 7, 2025 18
Train meet location
(two tracks required)

Contents
Cross Valley Corridor | November 7, 2025 19
Background & Overview of Route 3
Planning Parameters
Conceptual Timetables & Stringlines
Next Steps
6 10
24 Potential Infrastructure Requirements 19

The conceptual schedules assume the 2018 stations, a 79 MPH maximum speed, and identify where sidings are required
• This conceptual schedule assumes the 10 stations that are shown in Phase 3 in the 2018 plan and uses their approximate mileposts.

However, there were other potential stations discussed in the 2018 plan, and some stations have multiple potential locations. Further study is needed to determine which stations will ultimately be constructed. • As detailed in the technical parameters, this timetable assumes that the track’s maximum authorized speed is 79 MPH, which is known as Class 4.
• Additionally, to enable both the conceptual Phase 2 and Phase 3 schedules, a siding would be required between the Visalia and KingsTulare stations. To ensure that there is physical space to accommodate this meet, and away from downtown Visalia, the stringlines show a conceptual siding location with mileposts. This is displayed as shaded white in the stringlines and shows that meet occurring between mileposts 37 and 41.
• Two tracks would also be required near NAS Lemoore and Exeter to enable the meets required for the conceptual Phase 3 timetables.

Cross Valley Corridor | November 7, 2025 Page 1028 of 1117 20 The conceptual service assumes a minimum of two trainsets for Phase 2, four for Phase 3, and servicing these trainsets must also be considered • The Phase 2 schedule would require a minimum of two trainsets to operate, not including spares. Two trains would originate at Visalia, starting out the service day as train numbers 1 and 3. Because there is a consistent schedule, the train would make the same turns throughout the day and have 34 minutes to turn at Visalia and 16 minutes to turn at Lemoore. • The Phase 3 schedule would require a minimum of four trainsets to operate, not including spares. Three trains would originate at Porterville, starting out the service day as train numbers 1, 3, and 5. One train would start at Huron, starting out as train number 2.

Trains would have 24 minutes to turn at Porterville and 34 minutes to turn at Huron. • To support Cross Valley Corridor service, the trainsets must be serviced. In Phase 2, a maintenance facility near Visalia may be considered, as trains are planned to start at that location. • In Phase 3, three trains are planned to originate in Porterville, making a maintenance facility on the eastern end of the line a logical consideration. A site near Exeter, currently under review for the Fresno Regional Rail Study, could potentially be leveraged for this service as well; however, storing trains there overnight would result in additional deadhead mileage.

DB E.C.O. North America | Cross Valley Corridor | October 30, 2025 Page 1029 of 1117 21 A comparison table shows the high-level infrastructure requirements of Phases 2 and 3 • The below table offers a comparison of the estimated infrastructure required for Phases 2 and 3 of Cross Valley Corridor Service.

Cross Valley Corridor | November 7, 2025 22
Conceptual Schedule Features Phase 2 Phase 3
Approximate Route Mileage 29 77
Daily Number of Train Runs 36 36
Number of Train Meets (Locations where 2 Tracks Required) 1 3 Number of Stations in Conceptual Timetable 4 10
Minimum Number of Trainsets Required to Operate 2 4
Train Start Locations 2 sets - Visalia 3 sets – Porterville 1 set - Huron

The project team identified potential locations that warrant further infrastructure evaluation
• There are locations that should be studied further for required infrastructure upgrades and enable reliable Cross Valley Corridor service:
• Goshen junction: Cross Valley Corridor crosses the Union Pacific Fresno Subdivision at Goshen. Previous studies have identified the need for a flyover at this location to enable Cross Valley Corridor service, and Union Pacific should be consulted in future planning phases. Additionally, future Fresno Regional Rail service could utilize the UP Fresno Subdivision and intersect Cross Valley Corridor at Goshen. This could provide a transfer location between the two services, and land requirements for a Goshen station should be evaluated as part of future planning.
• Right-of-way curvature near Visalia and Exeter: Cross Valley Corridor route curves at several locations, and it should be studied further if there are opportunities to mitigate these curves. After discussion with the project team, supplemental runtime was added to the conceptual schedule to account for these curves. • Hanford: Cross Valley Corridor crosses the BNSF Bakersfield Subdivision in downtown Hanford. San Joaquin passenger service currently operates on this route but is not expected to still be doing so by the time Cross Valley Corridor service is implemented.

However, freight volumes are expected to increase, and coordination with BNSF will be necessary to assess potential freight service impacts on Cross Valley operations and to help determine if additional infrastructure, such as a flyover, is needed.

Cross Valley Corridor | November 7, 2025 Page 1031 of 1117 23 Contents
Cross Valley Corridor | November 7, 2025 24
Background & Overview of Route 3
Planning Parameters
Conceptual Timetables & Stringlines
Potential Infrastructure Requirements
6 10
19 Next Steps 24

This conceptual service plan will be refined as planning efforts progress • This conceptual service plan will be reviewed by regional stakeholders to gather feedback and ensure alignment with local priorities. It should be continuously updated to maintain compatibility with Fresno Regional Rail and High-Speed Rail as their planning progresses. • The plan should be refined as planning parameters, assumptions, and operational data are updated, ensuring that future service concepts reflect the most current information and technical constraints. Future updates may also consider a potential Phase 4 extension to Coalinga to maximize corridor ridership, which would need to be incorporated into the service plan. • The conceptual service plans should be treated as preliminary and are expected to change. They represent an initial step in developing a more detailed Cross Valley Corridor service plan, helping to guide future analysis of service design, trainset requirements, and infrastructure needs.

Cross Valley Corridor | November 7, 2025 Page 1033 of 1117 25

15.C.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: 12/16/2025 AGENDA SECTION: GENERAL BUSINESS SUBJECT:

Council: Receive and discuss the list of Committees and Boards that have representation appointed directly by the Council and approval of the proposed appointments through a formal vote.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: That the City Council receive and discuss the list of committees and boards that have representation appointed directly by the Council. Following this discussion, the Council is requested to approve the proposed appointments through a formal vote.

BACKGROUND:

Staff recommends that the Council review the Boards and Committees list and advise the Mayor of any specific interest in a particular committee. Interest should be expressed regardless of whether a current vacancy exists, or if a Council Member is currently a member of a particular committee and no longer wishes to serve in that capacity, the Council member should notify the Mayor that they are no longer interested.

The Mayor will then make a recommendation to the full Council regarding which representatives will serve on the various boards and committees for the 2026 term.

In addition to the assignments on various Boards and Committees, the Mayor serves as the official Council representative and is obligated to attend as the official City representative at various other meetings throughout the year, including the City Selection Committee, which meets as needed and is important in that it is the committee that appoints the City representative to LAFCO. Additionally, the Mayor is required to attend the City-County Coordinating Meeting (meets quarterly) and the South Valley San Joaquin Valley Membership meeting, which meets at various locations throughout the District and at the Cal Cities annual conference, and provide City updates to the membership during those respective meetings.

FISCAL IMPACT:

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Council Representation List

2025 COUNCIL REPRESENTATION ON BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES Boards and Commissions that include Hanford City Council Members but are not appointed by the Council:

San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority: Nancy Howze, Kings County Alternate San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, Citizens Advisory Committee: Mark Kairis, City Alternate LAFCO: Kimber Regan, City Alternate
League of California Cities – South San Joaquin Valley Division: Nancy Howze, Kings County Primary League of California Cities Policy Committees:
• Public Safety: Mark Kairis, Committee Chair
• Governance, Transparency, and Labor Relations: Travis Paden, Committee Member • Environmental Quality: Nancy Howze, Committee Member
Organization Primary Rep Alternate Rep
Kings Economic Development Corporation
(Last Monday each month – 11:30 am)
Mark Kairis
Kings County Association of Governments
(4th Wednesday each month – 4:30 pm)
Nancy Howze Travis Paden
Kings County Area Public Transit Agency (KART)
(4th Wednesday each month – 1:30 pm)
Nancy Howze Travis Paden
Kings County Abandoned Vehicle Authority
As needed (4th Wednesday each month – 4:30 pm)
Nancy Howze Travis Paden
Kings Community Action Organization (KCAO)
(3rd Wednesday each month - 4:30 pm)
Nancy Howze Travis Paden
Kings Waste and Recycling Authority (KWRA)
(2nd Wednesday each month - 8:00 am)
Mark Kairis Lou Martinez
Mid-Kings River Groundwater Sustainability Agency
(2nd Tuesday of each month – 1:00 pm)
(Alternate not required)
Kimber Regan
Kings County Area Disaster Council
(Meets 2-3 times a year)
Director of Emergency Services, Fire Chief, or the City Manager City Manager Fire Chief
Kings County Commission On Aging
(3rd Thursday each month – 2:30 pm) Community Member The City Council’s within Kings County shall appoint one person each.

Susie Chavez
Kings Mosquito Abatement District Board
(3rd Thursday of each month – 9:00 am)
One (1) member from each of the three (3) cities (Corcoran, Hanford, and Lemoore) 3 Year Term Cindy Harris
(Exp. 12/31/2026)

15.D.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: 12/16/2025 AGENDA SECTION: GENERAL BUSINESS SUBJECT:

Council: Review and Approve of the 2026 Calendar of City Council Meetings RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: That the City Council review the 2026 calendar of scheduled meetings for the City Council and direct staff to cancel or reschedule any specific dates.

BACKGROUND:

Over the course of each calendar year, holidays and City events occasionally create scheduling conflicts with regular City Council meetings. In previous years, the Council has asked staff to provide a proposed meeting calendar for the upcoming year so they can review it and determine whether any meetings should be canceled or rescheduled. Providing staff with advance notice of any changes allows for better planning around anticipated deadlines and helps ensure that agenda items are prepared and scheduled efficiently.

After reviewing the initial 2026 calendar, staff recommends canceling the City Council meetings scheduled for January 6, July 7, and December 1. These dates fall immediately before or after major holidays, and many staff and Council members may be traveling, making it difficult to plan and prepare agendas. Also, the Council can call special meetings if needed, and has historically done so in the past for election years in early December to certify election results and may also reorganize (for mayor and vice-mayor) at that meeting.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None
ATTACHMENTS:

1. 2026 Meeting Calendar 12

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING @ 7:00 PM HOLIDAYS- CITY HALL CLOSED PLANNING COMMISSION @ 5:30 P.M. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION @ 5:30 P.M.

MARCH

S M T W TH F S S M T W TH F S S M T W TH F S
1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 31

APRIL MAY JUNE

S M T W TH F S S M T W TH F S S M T W TH F S
1 2 3 4 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 27 28 29 30 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 28 29 30
31 JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER

S M T W TH F S S M T W TH F S S M T W TH F S
1 2 3 4 1 1 2 3 4 5
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 27 28 29 30
30 31

OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER

S M T W TH F S S M T W TH F S S M T W TH F S
1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 27 28 29 30 31

JANUARY FEBRUARY

SCHEDULED MEETINGS

HANFORD CITY COUNCIL & COMMISSIONS
2026
All Meetings are held at: City Council Chambers, 400 N. Douty, Hanford, CA (Civic Auditorium)

Warrant Register
Check Date Range: 11/1/2025 - 11/30/2025
Report Date: 12/4/2025

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
0001

GENERAL FUND

101800
IC-PARKS & COMM SERVICE
11/19/2025 186645 CITY OF HANFORD $1,500.00 2025WINTERWOND ERLAND
START UP CASH FOR 2025 WI
412000

SALES TAX
11/5/2025 186394 MUNI SERVICES, LLC $411.10 INV06-021901 SUTA TAX Q2 2025 412000

SALES TAX
11/19/2025 186683 MUNI SERVICES, LLC $500.00 INV06-021951 STARS 2025 Q2 DATA 796000

INTEREST EXPENSE
11/19/2025 1986 U S BANK $139,139.08 3045061 2022 TAXABLE PENSION OBLI 796000

INTEREST EXPENSE
11/19/2025 1986 U S BANK $219,663.71 3045061 2022 TAXABLE PENSION OBLI 796000

INTEREST EXPENSE
11/19/2025 1986 U S BANK $106,202.97 3045061 2022 TAXABLE PENSION OBLI DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 0001 - GENERAL FUND $467,416.86
0011

MEASURE H CAPITAL

826027
MH: FIRE

COMMUNICATION UP
11/5/2025 186320 DELL MARKETING LP $2,266.03 10843422077 LAPTOP FOR RADIO PROGRAMM 826631
MH: EXISTING PARKS
IMPROV
11/5/2025 186310 CALIF TURF EQUIPMENT &

SUPPLY INC
$3,549.94 696238 YAC - GRASS SEED AND FERT
826631
MH: EXISTING PARKS
IMPROV
11/5/2025 186393 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS
INC
$48,368.52 INV86413 (12) DRINKING FOUNTAINS -
826631
MH: EXISTING PARKS
IMPROV
11/14/2025 186518 CALIF TURF EQUIPMENT &

SUPPLY INC
$1,407.04 696239 YAC - GRASS SEED AND FERT
826632
MH: EXISTING PARK

MAINTEN
11/5/2025 186442 TELSTAR INSTRUMENTS, INC $2,048.00 128476 INSTALLATION OF PUMP @ SO 826632
MH: EXISTING PARK

MAINTEN
11/5/2025 186442 TELSTAR INSTRUMENTS, INC $2,922.73 128475 EMERGENCY - SOFTBALL COMP PAGE 1 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
0011

MEASURE H CAPITAL

826632
MH: EXISTING PARK

MAINTEN
11/14/2025 186512 BOGIE'S PUMP SYSTEMS, INC $51,664.02 20253 PURCHASE OF A WILO DUPLEX 826635
MH: FIRE STATION

IMPRO/EQ
11/14/2025 186595 VINCENT COMMUNICATIONS $5,770.01 91088 MEASURE H 3 HANDHELD RADI 826635
MH: FIRE STATION

IMPRO/EQ
11/19/2025 186650 J ' S COMMUNICATIONS, INC $325.00 72954 LABOR FOR SIGTRONIC MAINT 826635
MH: FIRE STATION

IMPRO/EQ
11/19/2025 186650 J ' S COMMUNICATIONS, INC $779.02 73285 REPLACEMENT FOR ENGINE 41 DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 0011 - MEASURE H CAPITAL $119,100.31 00580000
ARPA

821611

YAC CONCESSION BLDG
RESTO
11/17/2025 186597 J T 2 INC $43,677.20 4-674456 YAC-YOUTH ATHLETIC COMPLE DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 00580000 - ARPA $43,677.20
0265
LAD 04-3 T795

CAMBRIDGE/VINEYA
826014

PARK DRINKING

FOUNTAIN
11/5/2025 186393 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS
INC
$4,898.31 INV86413 (12) DRINKING FOUNTAINS -
DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 0265 - LAD 04-3 T795 CAMBRIDGE/VINEYA $4,898.31 0306

REFUSE OPERATIONS
FUND
796000

INTEREST EXPENSE
11/19/2025 1986 U S BANK $31,329.33 3045061 2022 TAXABLE PENSION OBLI DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 0306 - REFUSE OPERATIONS FUND $31,329.33 0340

BUILDING SAFETY
FUND
112000

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
11/5/2025 186410 ONE TIME VENDOR $5.00 REC-025641-2025 PAID TWICE; SYSTEM ERROR 112000

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
11/5/2025 186410 ONE TIME VENDOR $35.00 REC-025641-2025 PAID TWICE; SYSTEM ERROR 112000

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
11/5/2025 186410 ONE TIME VENDOR $50.00 REC-025641-2025 PAID TWICE; SYSTEM ERROR 112000

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
11/5/2025 186410 ONE TIME VENDOR $105.00 REC-025641-2025 PAID TWICE; SYSTEM ERROR 796000

INTEREST EXPENSE
11/19/2025 1986 U S BANK $6,409.29 3045061 2022 TAXABLE PENSION OBLI PAGE 2 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
0340

BUILDING SAFETY FU
DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 0340 - BUILDING SAFETY FUND $6,604.29 03401340

BUILDING SAFETY

732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186439 U S TELEPACIFIC CORP $110.40 187764676-0 PHONE SERVICE 10/23-11/22 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/14/2025 186588 T-MOBILE USA INC $125.40 995871713 2025-10 ACCT 995871713 BLDG VANS/ 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/19/2025 186727 VERIZON WIRELESS $291.79 6127438412 ACCT 771937214-00003 744000

OFFICE EXPENSE MISC
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$62.97 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186578 ROD CARSEY $3,528.32 25-10 BPO/PLAN REVIEW SERVICES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$185.14 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
825620

CD REMODEL
11/5/2025 186333 FRANEY FLOOR COVERING INC $1,070.00 25-0421 CD REMODEL/CARPET FOR CON 825620

CD REMODEL
11/5/2025 186333 FRANEY FLOOR COVERING INC $357.00 25-0421 CD REMODEL/CARPET FOR CON DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 03401340 - BUILDING SAFETY $5,731.02 0358

STORM DRAINAGE

OPER FUND
796000

INTEREST EXPENSE
11/19/2025 1986 U S BANK $6,293.70 3045061 2022 TAXABLE PENSION OBLI DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 0358 - STORM DRAINAGE OPER FUND $6,293.70 0361

WASTEWATER OPER
FUND
796000

INTEREST EXPENSE
11/19/2025 1986 U S BANK $17,099.13 3045061 2022 TAXABLE PENSION OBLI DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 0361 - WASTEWATER OPER FUND $17,099.13 0390

WATER OPERATIONS
FUND
112300

CONSUMER ACCTS

RECEIVABLE
11/5/2025 186401 ONE TIME VENDOR $13.19 88955 UB 09687734 2272 MIYA CT 112300

CONSUMER ACCTS

RECEIVABLE
11/5/2025 186402 ONE TIME VENDOR $497.54 88954 UB 10533000 1893 HARRISON 112300

CONSUMER ACCTS

RECEIVABLE
11/5/2025 186403 ONE TIME VENDOR $244.55 88979 UB 11027700 735 MANOR AVE PAGE 3 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
0390

WATER OPERATIONS
FUND
112300

CONSUMER ACCTS

RECEIVABLE
11/5/2025 186404 ONE TIME VENDOR $246.55 89236 UB 08717000 277 ORANGE CT 112300

CONSUMER ACCTS

RECEIVABLE
11/5/2025 186405 ONE TIME VENDOR $28.59 88953 UB 14901005 423 1/2 FLORI 112300

CONSUMER ACCTS

RECEIVABLE
11/5/2025 186406 ONE TIME VENDOR $82.37 88952 UB 14901004 423 FLORINDA 112300

CONSUMER ACCTS

RECEIVABLE
11/5/2025 186407 ONE TIME VENDOR $68.90 89293 UB 11501600 1411 BROWN ST 112300

CONSUMER ACCTS

RECEIVABLE
11/5/2025 186408 ONE TIME VENDOR $436.78 89294 UB 08249200 1913 WAUKENA 112300

CONSUMER ACCTS

RECEIVABLE
11/5/2025 186411 ONE TIME VENDOR $10.87 89292 UB 14501117 2250 DOUTY ST 112300

CONSUMER ACCTS

RECEIVABLE
11/5/2025 186412 ONE TIME VENDOR $25.24 89291 UB 12030574 1895 MERRITT 112300

CONSUMER ACCTS

RECEIVABLE
11/19/2025 186686 ONE TIME VENDOR $24.23 85930 UB 08215400 404 MAGNOLIA 112300

CONSUMER ACCTS

RECEIVABLE
11/19/2025 186687 ONE TIME VENDOR $106.38 85055 UB 08931169 1450 GREENFIE 112300

CONSUMER ACCTS

RECEIVABLE
11/19/2025 186688 ONE TIME VENDOR $295.59 83190 UB 08650049 2880 SPALDING 112300

CONSUMER ACCTS

RECEIVABLE
11/19/2025 186689 ONE TIME VENDOR $278.00 89483 UB 09687734 2272 MIYA CT 112300

CONSUMER ACCTS

RECEIVABLE
11/19/2025 186690 ONE TIME VENDOR $30.07 83985 UB 14701236 1219 REDINGTO 112300

CONSUMER ACCTS

RECEIVABLE
11/19/2025 186691 ONE TIME VENDOR $20.75 85048 UB 14601345 1845 10TH AVE PAGE 4 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
0390

WATER OPERATIONS
FUND
112300

CONSUMER ACCTS

RECEIVABLE
11/19/2025 186692 ONE TIME VENDOR $149.88 89477 UB 09071165 1002 6TH ST 112300

CONSUMER ACCTS

RECEIVABLE
11/19/2025 186693 ONE TIME VENDOR $200.58 84068 UB 14601048 330 MAGNOLIA 112300

CONSUMER ACCTS

RECEIVABLE
11/19/2025 186694 ONE TIME VENDOR $43.15 89476 UB 09028327 1382 WINTERCR 112300

CONSUMER ACCTS

RECEIVABLE
11/19/2025 186695 ONE TIME VENDOR $208.12 89478 UB 11435900 1074 JORDAN W 796000

INTEREST EXPENSE
11/19/2025 1986 U S BANK $27,696.26 3045061 2022 TAXABLE PENSION OBLI DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 0390 - WATER OPERATIONS FUND $30,707.59 0400

CITY PAYROLL

REVOL FUND
205704

INSUR-P/R DED LIFE
11/5/2025 186315 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT

INSURANCE CO
$54.56 54087030805497 2025-08 PAYROLL DEDUCTION
205704

INSUR-P/R DED LIFE
11/14/2025 186519 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT

INSURANCE CO
$54.56 54087030905532 SEPT. 2025
205704

INSUR-P/R DED LIFE
11/19/2025 1978 LINCOLN LIFE ASSURANCE CO

OF BOSTON
$5,945.56 5375581 SEPTEMBER 2025 ACHPY14333
205900

EMPLOYEES ASSOCNS

PAYABLE
11/14/2025 186500 G E M A 1121211070 $690.00 290152 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 205900

EMPLOYEES ASSOCNS

PAYABLE
11/14/2025 186501 H M E A 0000129193 $13.00 291165 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 205900

EMPLOYEES ASSOCNS

PAYABLE
11/14/2025 186502 H P O A 3242162141 $4,887.00 292166 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 205900

EMPLOYEES ASSOCNS

PAYABLE
11/14/2025 186503 I A F F, LOCAL 3898
A/C#9129026
$2,025.00 293152 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
205900

EMPLOYEES ASSOCNS

PAYABLE
11/14/2025 186505 S E I U LOCAL 521 $2,560.52 295171 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 205900

EMPLOYEES ASSOCNS

PAYABLE
11/28/2025 186733 G E M A 1121211070 $690.00 290153 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS PAGE 5 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
0400

CITY PAYROLL

REVOL FUND
205900

EMPLOYEES ASSOCNS

PAYABLE
11/28/2025 186734 H M E A 0000129193 $13.00 291166 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 205900

EMPLOYEES ASSOCNS

PAYABLE
11/28/2025 186735 H P O A 3242162141 $4,887.00 292167 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 205900

EMPLOYEES ASSOCNS

PAYABLE
11/28/2025 186736 I A F F, LOCAL 3898
A/C#9129026
$2,025.00 293153 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
205900

EMPLOYEES ASSOCNS

PAYABLE
11/28/2025 186738 S E I U LOCAL 521 $2,568.78 295172 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 206300

EMPLOYEES ATTACHMENT
PAY
11/14/2025 186498 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
DEPT
$162.00 28833 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
206300

EMPLOYEES ATTACHMENT
PAY
11/14/2025 186499 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD $335.76 289141 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 206300

EMPLOYEES ATTACHMENT
PAY
11/14/2025 186504 KINGS COUNTY SHERIFF'S
OFFICE
$233.81 6281101 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
206300

EMPLOYEES ATTACHMENT
PAY
11/28/2025 186731 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
DEPT
$162.00 28834 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
206300

EMPLOYEES ATTACHMENT
PAY
11/28/2025 186732 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD $360.61 289142 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 206300

EMPLOYEES ATTACHMENT
PAY
11/28/2025 186737 KINGS COUNTY SHERIFF'S
OFFICE
$233.81 6281102 PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS
207400

TRANSAMERICA
11/14/2025 186590 TRANSAMERICA LIFE

INSURANCE CO
$1,083.90 2505806516 2025-08 PREMIUM PAYMENT G
207400

TRANSAMERICA
11/14/2025 186590 TRANSAMERICA LIFE

INSURANCE CO
$1,083.90 2505831830 2025-09 PREMIUM PAYMENT G
207400

TRANSAMERICA
11/14/2025 186590 TRANSAMERICA LIFE

INSURANCE CO
$1,083.90 2505854852 2025-10 PREMIUM PAYMENT G
207700

LEGAL SHIELD
11/5/2025 186373 PRE PAID LEGAL SERVICE, INC $447.65 2025-08 2025-08 PREMIUM PAYMENT G 207700

LEGAL SHIELD
11/14/2025 186564 PRE PAID LEGAL SERVICE, INC $515.45 2025-09 2025-09 PREMIUM PAYMENT G PAGE 6 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
0400

CITY PAYROLL

REVOL FUND
210100
VOYA
11/5/2025 186461 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE CO $2,626.80 12A8236577 2025-08 VOYA PREMIUMS 210100
VOYA
11/19/2025 186730 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE CO $2,571.24 12A8650609 2025-09 VOYA PREMIUMS DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 0400 - CITY PAYROLL REVOL FUND $37,314.81 0405

MEDICAL FUND

207500

LANE HEALTH
11/4/2025 1963 LIVELY, INC. $225.00 CY25 PP022 HEALTH SAVINGS ACCT 207500

LANE HEALTH
11/18/2025 1979 LIVELY, INC. $16,931.46 CY25 PP023 HEALTH SAVINGS ACCT 300504

INSURANCE-RETIRED

EMPLOYE
11/6/2025 1988 COMPASS HEALTH

ADMINISTRATORS
$223.27 20251105 COMPASS/RETIREE
300504

INSURANCE-RETIRED

EMPLOYE
11/12/2025 1989 COMPASS HEALTH

ADMINISTRATORS
$98.22 NVCOH-CP-103125 COMPASS RETIREE/PHARMACY
300504

INSURANCE-RETIRED

EMPLOYE
11/13/2025 1987 COMPASS HEALTH

ADMINISTRATORS
$873.73 20251112A COMPASS/RETIREE/ADMIN FEE
300504

INSURANCE-RETIRED

EMPLOYE
11/20/2025 1972 COMPASS HEALTH

ADMINISTRATORS
$2,943.11 20251119 COMPASS/RETIREE/ADMIN FEE
719603

SELF INS MEDICAL
11/6/2025 1988 COMPASS HEALTH

ADMINISTRATORS
$16,951.46 20251105 COMPASS/RETIREE
719603

SELF INS MEDICAL
11/13/2025 1987 COMPASS HEALTH

ADMINISTRATORS
$27,644.83 20251112A COMPASS/RETIREE/ADMIN FEE
719603

SELF INS MEDICAL
11/20/2025 1972 COMPASS HEALTH

ADMINISTRATORS
$93,474.17 20251119 COMPASS/RETIREE/ADMIN FEE
719603

SELF INS MEDICAL
11/20/2025 1973 COMPASS HEALTH

ADMINISTRATORS
$7,150.13 20251112 COMPASS
719604

SELF INS PRESCRIPTIONS
11/12/2025 1989 COMPASS HEALTH

ADMINISTRATORS
$24,807.61 NVCOH-CP-103125 COMPASS RETIREE/PHARMACY
749503

WELLNESS
11/5/2025 186326 ELITE CORPORATE MEDICAL

SERVICES, INC
$14,971.92 9697 FY26 EMPLOYEE SHARED HEAL
749503

WELLNESS
11/5/2025 186326 ELITE CORPORATE MEDICAL

SERVICES, INC
$3,093.75 9717 FY26 EMPLOYEE SHARED HEAL
749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186467 FRANK ALVISO $119.00 1142865 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO PAGE 7 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
0405

MEDICAL FUND

749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186468 FRANKIE BERNAL $119.00 4320536 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186469 RICHARD BUTTS $119.00 1142965 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186470 JOHN M CAIN $119.00 1143165 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186471 NICHOLAS CARDARAS $119.00 1143265 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186472 TERRY CARR $119.00 1143365 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186473 JERRY CHOW $119.00 1143765 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186474 SIDNEY DAVIS $119.00 4894032 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186475 BRIAN DECUIR $119.00 1143865 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186476 MARK DILLON $119.00 1142665 RETIREE INSURANCE- CITY C 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186477 DOLORES GALLEGOS $119.00 1143965 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186478 DAVID E GARCIA $119.00 1144065 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186479 JOHN L GOMES $119.00 1144165 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186480 DON GREEN $119.00 1144265 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO PAGE 8 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
0405

MEDICAL FUND

749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186481 CATHY GREGORY $119.00 1144365 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186482 ROBERT HERNANDEZ $119.00 1144465 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186483 TIMOTHY L IERONIMO $119.00 1144665 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186484 CHRIS JORDAN $119.00 1144765 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186486 JOHN LOBOA $119.00 1144965 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186487 GLORIA LOPEZ $119.00 1145165 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186488 MARY MATA $119.00 1145265 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186489 MANUEL MEDRANO $119.00 1145465 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186490 PETER M MOES $119.00 1145665 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186491 LUIS M NAVARRO $119.00 1145765 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186492 JOE H RAMSEY $119.00 1145865 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186493 DAVID REBELO $119.00 1145964 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186494 JAN REYNOLDS $119.00 1146165 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO PAGE 9 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
0405

MEDICAL FUND

749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186495 SCOTT, DAVID $119.00 1146265 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186496 GEORGE SEPEDA $119.00 1146465 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/5/2025 186497 WES YEARY $119.00 1146565 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/12/2025 1993 LIVELY, INC. $430.70 1437042 OCTOBER 2025 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/13/2025 1987 COMPASS HEALTH

ADMINISTRATORS
$5.45 20251112A COMPASS/RETIREE/ADMIN FEE
749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/14/2025 186567 DAREN MATTESON $119.00 89001 RETIREE INSURANCE-CITY CO 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/14/2025 186567 DAREN MATTESON $119.00 89002 OCT. RETIREE INSURANCE-CI 749600

GRP INSUR ADM EXPENSE

11/20/2025 1972 COMPASS HEALTH

ADMINISTRATORS
$14.83 20251119 COMPASS/RETIREE/ADMIN FEE
DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 0405 - MEDICAL FUND $213,647.64
0415

INFORMATION TECH

SERV FUND
796000

INTEREST EXPENSE
11/19/2025 1986 U S BANK $3,077.41 3045061 2022 TAXABLE PENSION OBLI DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 0415 - INFORMATION TECH SERV FUND $3,077.41 0416

BUILDING

MAINTENANCE FUND

796000

INTEREST EXPENSE
11/19/2025 1986 U S BANK $7,306.72 3045061 2022 TAXABLE PENSION OBLI DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 0416 - BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND $7,306.72 0447

FLEET MAINT OPER
FUND
796000

INTEREST EXPENSE
11/19/2025 1986 U S BANK $10,345.60 3045061 2022 TAXABLE PENSION OBLI DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 0447 - FLEET MAINT OPER FUND $10,345.60 0511

MISC CASH DEP

TRUST FUND
112000

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
11/5/2025 186410 ONE TIME VENDOR $1.00 REC-025641-2025 PAID TWICE; SYSTEM ERROR PAGE 10 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
0511

MISC CASH DEP

TRUST FUND
300500

KC-EL RANCHO DEBT

SERVICE
11/5/2025 186359 KINGS CO PUBLIC WORKS $2,957.05 2025-09 DEBT SVC COLL SEPTEMBER 300500

KC-EL RANCHO DEBT

SERVICE
11/19/2025 186660 KINGS CO PUBLIC WORKS $2,947.35 2025-10 DEBT SVC COLL OCTOBER DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 0511 - MISC CASH DEP TRUST FUND $5,905.40 11000000

CITY COUNCIL

732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186440 T-MOBILE USA INC $92.05 997828401 2025-10 2025-10 ACCT 997828401 PH 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186570 NIELSON MERKSAMER

PARRINELLO
$6,050.00 296912 LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERV
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186574 ROGERS, ANDERSON, MALODY
& SCOTT, LLP
$21,000.00 79036 FY25 AUDIT SERVICES
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186589 THORN RUN PARTNERS LLC $5,500.00 229777 BPO/ GOVERNMENT RELATIONS 777001

TRAVEL-DISTRICT A
11/14/2025 186542 ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR $198.00 40323608 2025-10 CAR RENTAL 777001

TRAVEL-DISTRICT A
11/19/2025 186699 TRAVIS PADEN $192.00 TRV 10/07-10 2025 TRV LONG BEACH 2025 10/07 777002

TRAVEL-DISTRICT B
11/14/2025 186542 ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR $198.00 40323608 2025-10 CAR RENTAL 777005

TRAVEL-DISTRICT E
11/14/2025 186542 ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR $198.00 40323608 2025-10 CAR RENTAL DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 11000000 - CITY COUNCIL $33,428.05
11100000

CITY MANAGER-CITY
CLERK
732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186439 U S TELEPACIFIC CORP $96.60 187764676-0 PHONE SERVICE 10/23-11/22 744000

OFFICE EXPENSE MISC
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$58.56 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186303 GVP VENTURES, INC $10,000.00 11290 RECRUITMENT AGENCY - CITY 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186548 HAWK ON HAND $5,200.00 HAN1980 2025-10 CROW ABATEMENT PAGE 11 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
11100000

CITY MANAGER-CITY
CLERK
777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/5/2025 186314 COLLEGE OF THE SEQUOIAS $2,500.00 0110-SDL-2346 MANAGING CHANGE

WORKSHOP
777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/5/2025 186441 CHRISTOPHER TAVAREZ $134.00 TRV 2025 11/04-07 TRV PASADENA 2025 11/04-0 777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/19/2025 186624 NATALIE CORRAL $170.00 TRV 2025 11/12-14 TRV LA 2025 11/12-14 - LE DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 11100000 - CITY MANAGER-CITY CLERK $18,159.16 11102020

AIRPORT

OPERATIONS
732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186273 A T & T $31.41 24192155 ACCT#9391033910 CALNET- P 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186515 BRANDLEY ENGINEERING, INC. $1,222.50 11593 Hanford Airport Pavement 778500

UTILITIES-GAS
11/7/2025 1996 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO $6.57 2025-10 2025-10 GAS SERVICE DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 11102020 - AIRPORT OPERATIONS $1,260.48 11102021

AIRPORT CAPITA

826652
RPL 70FT SEWER LINE AT
AI
11/19/2025 186648 HOLLOWAY CONSTRUCTION,
INC
$328.19 1454 UHAUL CONCRETE FOR AIRPOR
DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 11102021 - AIRPORT CAPITA $328.19
11110000

HUMAN RESOURCES

732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186439 U S TELEPACIFIC CORP $55.20 187764676-0 PHONE SERVICE 10/23-11/22 744000

OFFICE EXPENSE MISC
11/5/2025 186399 OFFICE DEPOT (CONTRACT) $141.64 37898151 2025-09 - CONSOLIDATED FO 745000

PUBLICATIONS AND DUES

11/5/2025 186396 GOVERNMENTJOBS.COM, INC $2,307.58 INV-147034 RECRUITMENT SUBSCRIPTION 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/4/2025 1965 UKG INC $1,074.00 I01100084068 2025-09 SUBSCRIPTION FEES 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186349 I C M A RETIREMENT CORP
#303617
$125.00 20250930-109-
320501A

RETIREMENT QUARTERLY PLAN
749501

LIVE SCAN
11/5/2025 186308 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE $196.00 852058 2025-09 LIVESCANS PAGE 12 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
11110000

HUMAN RESOURCES

749501

LIVE SCAN
11/5/2025 186363 KINGS INDUSTRIAL OCCUP

MEDICAL CTR
$1,227.00 307674 PRE EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
749501

LIVE SCAN
11/5/2025 186364 KINGS MEDICAL CENTERS $309.00 306805 PRE EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 749501

LIVE SCAN
11/14/2025 186573 PLEXUS GLOBAL LLC $114.00 19282 BPO/RANDOM DRUG

SCREENING
749503

WELLNESS
11/5/2025 186306 BRIENO, BRIANA $35.00 2025 Q3-GYMBRIENO,B2025 Q3 GYM REIMBURSEMENT 749503

WELLNESS
11/5/2025 186317 NATALIE CORRAL $35.00 2025 Q3-GYMCORRAL,N2025 Q3 GYM REIMBURSEMENT 749503

WELLNESS
11/5/2025 186318 STACIE COSTA $35.00 2025 Q3-GYM 2025 Q3 GYM REIMBURSEMENT 749503

WELLNESS
11/5/2025 186330 MADDISON FARIA $35.00 2025 Q3-GYM 2025 Q3 GYM REIMBURSEMENT 749503

WELLNESS
11/5/2025 186340 DAVID W GREEN $35.00 2025 Q3-GYM 2025 Q3 GYM REIMBURSEMENT 749503

WELLNESS
11/5/2025 186354 JOEL DAVID BARBA $35.00 2025 Q3-GYMBARBA,J2025 Q3 GYM REIMBURSEMENT 749503

WELLNESS
11/5/2025 186374 SANDRA LERMA-MARTINEZ $30.00 2025 Q3-GYM 2025 Q3 GYM REIMBURSEMENT 749503

WELLNESS
11/5/2025 186422 ZACHARY RAPP $35.00 2025 Q3-GYMRAPP,Z2025 Q3 GYM REIMBURSEMENT 749503

WELLNESS
11/5/2025 186430 CESAR SALAS-LEMUS $35.00 2025 Q3-GYM 2025 Q3 GYM REIMBURSEMENT 749503

WELLNESS
11/5/2025 186452 VALENCIA, LISA $31.00 2025 Q3 GYM 2025 Q3 GYM REIMBURSEMENT 749503

WELLNESS
11/5/2025 186460 VIVIANA GALVAN $35.00 2025 Q3-GYM 2025 Q3 GYM REIMBURSEMENT 749503

WELLNESS
11/5/2025 186462 WESLEY CORRAL $35.00 2025 Q3-GYMCORRAL,W2025 Q3 GYM REIMBURSEMENT DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 11110000 - HUMAN RESOURCES $5,960.42 12010000
FINANCEACCOUNTING
732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186439 U S TELEPACIFIC CORP $96.60 187764676-0 PHONE SERVICE 10/23-11/22 744000

OFFICE EXPENSE MISC
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$112.96 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
PAGE 13 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
12010000
FINANCEACCOUNTING
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/4/2025 1965 UKG INC $5,383.61 I01100084068 2025-09 SUBSCRIPTION FEES 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186324 EIDE BAILLY LLP $254.25 EI01953447 FY25 YEAR-END SERVICES-OC 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$42.09 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186409 ONE TIME VENDOR $64.00 REC-023459-2025 DUP BL CC PAYMENT REFUND 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186508 ARC FRESNO/MADERA

COUNTIES, THE
$101.70 14994 SHREDDING SERVICES-FINANC
DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 12010000 - FINANCE-ACCOUNTING $6,055.21 12100000

FINANCE-UTILITY

BILLING
730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/5/2025 186457 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $10.98 5031639228 BPO/ACCT 2322940000 UNIFO 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/5/2025 186457 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $10.98 5031642204 BPO/ACCT 2322940000 UNIFO 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/14/2025 186592 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $10.98 5031645185 BPO/ACCT 2322940000 UNIFO 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/14/2025 186592 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $10.98 5031630274 BPO/ACCT 2322940000 UNIFO 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186720 STADRI EMBLEMS $17.53 483493 COH LOGO UNIFORM PATCHES 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186729 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $8.53 27594642 UNIFORM BLUE JACKETS 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186729 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $14.22 27580032 UNIFORM BLUE JACKETS 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186729 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $4.05 27563693 UNIFORM BLUE JACKETS 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186439 U S TELEPACIFIC CORP $96.60 187764676-0 PHONE SERVICE 10/23-11/22 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186440 T-MOBILE USA INC $107.85 995770698 2025-10 2025-10 ACCT 995770698 iP 744000

OFFICE EXPENSE MISC
11/5/2025 186399 OFFICE DEPOT (CONTRACT) $81.60 37898151 2025-09 - CONSOLIDATED FO PAGE 14 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
12100000

FINANCE-UTILITY

BILLING
745500

POSTAGE AND FREIGHT
11/14/2025 186553 INFOSEND, INC. $10,739.74 297323 BPO/UBS & FINANCE PRINTIN 747000

PRINTING
11/14/2025 186553 INFOSEND, INC. $1,639.34 297323 BPO/UBS & FINANCE PRINTIN 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186637 GARDA CL WEST INC $1,081.15 10830945 2025-11 TRANSPORT TO WELL 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186414 PRE-SORT CENTER OF

STOCKTON INC
$62.68 4100110931 BPO/UBS & FINANCE PRINTIN
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186414 PRE-SORT CENTER OF

STOCKTON INC
$62.19 410110457 BPO/UBS & FINANCE PRINTIN
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186414 PRE-SORT CENTER OF

STOCKTON INC
$54.33 410110538 BPO/UBS & FINANCE PRINTIN
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186414 PRE-SORT CENTER OF

STOCKTON INC
$54.19 410110635 BPO/UBS & FINANCE PRINTIN
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186553 INFOSEND, INC. $741.08 297323 BPO/UBS & FINANCE PRINTIN DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 12100000 - FINANCE-UTILITY BILLING $14,809.00 13000000
CITY

ATTORNEY/LEGAL
SVCS
749000

CONTRACTED LEGAL

SERVICES
11/5/2025 186341 GRISWOLD, LASALLE, COBB,

DOWD & GIN
$68,752.91 2025-09 2025-09 LEGAL SVC
751800

SPECIAL LEGAL SERVICES
11/5/2025 186341 GRISWOLD, LASALLE, COBB,

DOWD & GIN
$1,532.99 2025-09 2025-09 LEGAL SVC
751900

LIABILITY RISK

MANAGEMENT
11/5/2025 186341 GRISWOLD, LASALLE, COBB,

DOWD & GIN
$16,696.51 2025-09 2025-09 LEGAL SVC
DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 13000000 - CITY ATTORNEY/LEGAL SVCS $86,982.41 13090000

LIABILITY

INSURANCE
733000

LIABILITY INSURANCE
11/5/2025 186292 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES
INC
$2,123.00 3286805 MOTOR VEHICLE PROGRAM
733000

LIABILITY INSURANCE
11/5/2025 186336 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY INC $4,332.00 INV1033100 2025-11 CLAIMS MGMT FLAT 733800

SPECIAL-LITIGATION
EXPENS
11/5/2025 186375 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE $4,501.00 307234 LITIGATION FEES PAGE 15 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
13090000

LIABILITY

INSURANCE
733800

SPECIAL-LITIGATION
EXPENS
11/5/2025 186375 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE $14,283.50 307235 LITIGATION FEES 733800

SPECIAL-LITIGATION
EXPENS
11/5/2025 186375 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE $1,862.00 307236 LITIGATION FEES 733800

SPECIAL-LITIGATION
EXPENS
11/5/2025 186375 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE $29,998.65 307237 LITIGATION FEES 733800

SPECIAL-LITIGATION
EXPENS
11/5/2025 186375 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE $5,189.50 307233 LITIGATION FEES DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 13090000 - LIABILITY INSURANCE $62,289.65 13100000

WORKERS'

COMPENSATION
707169

WORKERS' COMP

INSURANCE
11/19/2025 1977 ACCLAMATION INSURANCE

MGMT SVC-WC
$119,354.99 2025-10 AIMS TRUST REPLENISHMENT
DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 13100000 - WORKERS' COMPENSATION $119,354.99 13140000

COMPUTER REPL

RESERVE
800121

COMPUTER/MDT/MONITOR

11/14/2025 186539 DELL MARKETING LP $16,989.79 10837652839 FY26 DESKTOP REPLACEMENTS DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 13140000 - COMPUTER REPL RESERVE $16,989.79 13150000
I T S

INFORMATIONAL

TECH SERV
732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186439 U S TELEPACIFIC CORP $69.00 187764676-0 PHONE SERVICE 10/23-11/22 743000

COMPUTER MAINTENANCE

11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$826.45 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186320 DELL MARKETING LP $133,692.21 10840750712 FY26 MICROSOFT ENTERPRISE 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186447 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC $993.52 045-539888 CITIZEN SELF SERVICE 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186616 COMCAST BUSINESS $6,182.60 254540069 2025-10 ETHERNET SERVICES 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186617 COMCAST BUSINESS $6,182.60 251959672 2025-09 ETHERNET SERVICES PAGE 16 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
13150000
I T S

INFORMATIONAL

TECH SERV
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186618 COMCAST BUSINESS $6,083.63 249518619 2025-08 ETHERNET SERVICES 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186619 COMCAST BUSINESS $390.03 254540274 2025-10 INTERNET SERVICE749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186620 COMCAST BUSINESS $384.27 251959624 2025-09 INTERNET SERVICE749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186621 COMCAST BUSINESS $384.27 249518674 2025-08 INTERNET SERVICE749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186727 VERIZON WIRELESS $40.01 6127438412 ACCT 771937214-00003 778500

UTILITIES-GAS
11/7/2025 1996 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO $15.78 2025-10 2025-10 GAS SERVICE DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 13150000 - I T S INFORMATIONAL TECH SERV $155,244.37 14110000

PLANNING

OPERATIONS
732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186439 U S TELEPACIFIC CORP $69.00 187764676-0 PHONE SERVICE 10/23-11/22 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186271 4CREEKS INC $2,383.50 4C009891 ON-CALL PLANNING SERVICES 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186271 4CREEKS INC $7,827.50 4C009383 ON-CALL PLANNING SERVICES 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186335 GEOINOVO SOLUTIONS INC. $1,516.25 487 ON-CALL GIS IMPLEMENTATIO 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$21.56 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 14110000 - PLANNING OPERATIONS $11,817.81 14120000

CODE COMPLIANCE

732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186439 U S TELEPACIFIC CORP $69.00 187764676-0 PHONE SERVICE 10/23-11/22 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/19/2025 186727 VERIZON WIRELESS $175.33 6127438412 ACCT 771937214-00003 PAGE 17 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
14120000

CODE COMPLIANCE

760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$21.57 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 14120000 - CODE COMPLIANCE $265.90
14120001

MEAS H CODE

COMPLIANCE
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186588 T-MOBILE USA INC $1,061.19 995871713 2025-10 ACCT 995871713 BLDG VANS/ DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 14120001 - MEAS H CODE COMPLIANCE $1,061.19 14130000

CITY HFD PUBLIC

HSG AUTH
732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186439 U S TELEPACIFIC CORP $41.40 187764676-0 PHONE SERVICE 10/23-11/22 744000

OFFICE EXPENSE MISC
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$386.80 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186334 G M S, INC $380.00 5257 2025-09 GMS LICENSE/SERVI 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$21.57 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 14130000 - CITY HFD PUBLIC HSG AUTH $829.77 14310000

CENTRAL PARKING &

IMPRV OPER
790400

CITY CONTRIBUTIONS TO
11/5/2025 186379 MAIN STREET HANFORD $5,501.42 2025-11 MAIN STREET HANFORD PASS DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 14310000 - CENTRAL PARKING & IMPRV OPER $5,501.42 14500200

CDBG ENTITLEMENT

792311

KCAO FOOD BANK SVC
CENTER
11/5/2025 186362 KINGS COMMUNITY ACTION

ORGANIZTN
$176,034.50 #6 KCAO-FOOD BANK SERV. CENT
DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 14500200 - CDBG ENTITLEMENT $176,034.50 15110000

POLICE-SUPPORT

SERVICE
732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186281 A T & T $189.17 24192170 5595854700 LONG DIST 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186282 A T & T $38.93 24192171 9391033927-PRIMARY STATIO 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186283 A T & T $61.27 24192172 9391033927-PRIMARY STATIO 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186284 A T & T $31.41 24192299 ACCT#9391053005 CALNET- P PAGE 18 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
15110000

POLICE-SUPPORT

SERVICE
732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186285 A T & T $86.55 24192350 ACCT#9391054245 CALNET- P 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186289 A T & T $285.94 24227131 9391063992-DOJ 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186290 A T & T $450.18 287334182267X101
025
2025-10 DEPARTMENT CELLPH
732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186439 U S TELEPACIFIC CORP $963.19 187764676-0 PHONE SERVICE 10/23-11/22 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186440 T-MOBILE USA INC $3,815.22 206082578 2025-10 ACCT. 206082578 C 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186455 MCI NETWORK SERV, INC $912.29 73473948 2025-08 CALNET3 SYSTEM & 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186456 MCI NETWORK SERV, INC $919.39 73497940 BPO/CALNET3 SYSTEM & MOBI 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186308 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE $1,402.00 849771 BPO/CUSTOMER #142069 FOR 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186328 EMPLOYEE RELATIONS INC $8.00 99985 BPO/PRE-EMPLOYMENT CREDIT 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186378 RAYMOND C MADRIGAL $700.00 2025-023 BPO/PRE EMPLOYMENT BACKGR 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186435 SPEAKWRITE LLC $381.00 255560ba 2025-10 SPEAKWRITE DICTAT 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/7/2025 1991 COMCAST CABLE

COMMUNICATIONS, INC
$199.95 0695141 10/25 ACCT 8155 50 039 0695141
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/7/2025 1992 COMCAST CABLE

COMMUNICATIONS, INC
$263.90 0704471 10/25 ACCT 8155 50 039 0704471
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186516 CALIFORNIA FORENSIC

INSTITUTE
$700.00 1721 BPO/WELLNESS CHECKS
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186516 CALIFORNIA FORENSIC

INSTITUTE
$400.00 HPD014 BPO/PRE EMPLOYMENT PSYCHS
PAGE 19 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
15110000

POLICE-SUPPORT

SERVICE
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186523 COMCAST BUSINESS $244.18 254540226 2025-10 INTERNET SERVICE749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186524 COMCAST BUSINESS $240.57 251959543 2025-09 INTERNET SERVICE749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186525 COMCAST BUSINESS $240.57 249518651 2025-08 INTERNET SERVICE749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186526 COMCAST BUSINESS $296.17 254540273 2025-10 INTERNET SERVICE749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186527 COMCAST BUSINESS $291.79 251959623 2025-09 INTERNET SERVICE749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186528 COMCAST BUSINESS $291.79 249518673 2025-08 INTERNET SERVICE749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186529 COMCAST BUSINESS $249.39 254540746 2025-10 INTERNET SERVICE749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186530 COMCAST BUSINESS $245.70 251959814 2025-09 INTERNET SERVICE749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186531 COMCAST BUSINESS $245.70 249519076 2025-09 INTERNET SERVICE749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186611 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE $1,013.00 002392 2025-10 CUST#142069 FOR L 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186611 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE $1,876.98 000860 CY26 Q3 CLETS SERVICES #5 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186622 COMCAST CABLE

COMMUNICATIONS, INC
$27.44 0146699 11/25 ACCT 8155 50 039 0146699
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$47.90 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
PAGE 20 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
15110000

POLICE-SUPPORT

SERVICE
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186319 DAVID MATTOS $910.00 8850 PAL BLDG - SEPT. & OCT S 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186319 DAVID MATTOS $220.00 9434 2025-11 SERVICE 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186376 LIVE ACTION SAFETY $239.25 190074 15 BASIC IFAK BAGS 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186431 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIP CO $4,036.11 666021 TRAINING/ OFFICER AMMO 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186458 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $22.62 2580620075 BPO/PD & FIRE FLOOR MATS 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186593 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $129.70 2580623229 BPO/PD & FIRE FLOOR MATS 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186593 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $22.62 2580626268 BPO/PD & FIRE FLOOR MATS 760300

SWAT EXPENSES
11/19/2025 186713 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIP CO $1,995.87 666883 SWAT AMMO 777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/5/2025 186390 MICHAEL CRAWMER $225.00 TRV 2025 11/17-21 TRV FRES 2025 11/17-21 - 777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/5/2025 186416 SEANNAH PICAZO $301.00 TRV 2025 11/16-19 TRV SAN CLEM 2025 11/16-1 777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/5/2025 186432 SANTA ROSA JR COLLEGE $67.50 AR26-00586 TRAINING MANAGER COURSE - 777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/14/2025 186542 ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR $1,461.50 40323608 2025-10 CAR RENTAL 777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/19/2025 186615 COLLEGE OF THE SEQUOIAS $500.00 777 DRG/ALC RECO-11550#2-LOPE PAGE 21 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
15110000

POLICE-SUPPORT

SERVICE
777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/19/2025 186633 ERNEST ESCALERA $225.00 TRV 2025 12/01-05 TRV FRES 2025 12/1-5 - IC 777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/19/2025 186636 FRESNO CITY COLLEGE $210.00 19649677-79 INTERVIEW/INTERROGATION A 777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/19/2025 186641 JASON GUSTIN $301.00 TRV 2025 12/01-04 TRV SD 2025 12/01-04 - CA 777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/19/2025 186653 ROLANDO JAIME $301.00 TRV 2025 12/14-17 TRV GARDEN GROVE 2025 12/ 777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/19/2025 186654 ROLANDO JAIME $135.00 TRV 2025 12/08-10 TRV FRES 2025 12/08-10 - 777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/19/2025 186671 JAMES LUTZ $301.00 TRV 2025 12/01-04 TRV SD 2025 12/1-4 - CATO 777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/19/2025 186672 JAMES LUTZ $301.00 TRV 2025 12/07-10 TRV ANA 2025 12/7-10 - IA 777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/19/2025 186677 CHAD MEDEIROS $135.00 TRV 2025 12/08-10 TRV FRES 2025 12/08-10 - 777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/19/2025 186696 JORGE OROSCO $506.00 TRV 2025 11/30-
12/05
TRV MONT 2025 11/30-12/05
777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/19/2025 186697 JORGE OROSCO $506.00 TRV 2025 12/07-12 TRV MONT 2025 12/07-12 - 777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/19/2025 186726 JUSTIN VALLIN $301.00 TRV 2025 12/07-10 TRV ANA 2025 12/7-10 - IA 778500

UTILITIES-GAS
11/7/2025 1996 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO $144.36 2025-10 2025-10 GAS SERVICE 800121

COMPUTER/MDT/MONITOR

11/5/2025 186320 DELL MARKETING LP $1,760.09 10841335510 LAPTOP 1511 LT - DELL PRO PAGE 22 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
15110000

POLICE-SUPPORT

SERVICE
826022
EVIDENCE 3D SCANNING
MACH
11/5/2025 186331 FARO TECHNOLOGIES INC $54,781.15 91871922 FARO MACHINE 826022
EVIDENCE 3D SCANNING
MACH
11/5/2025 186331 FARO TECHNOLOGIES INC $9,600.00 91871703 FARO MACHINE 826022
EVIDENCE 3D SCANNING
MACH
11/5/2025 186331 FARO TECHNOLOGIES INC $8,738.00 91871702 FARO MACHINE DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 15110000 - POLICE-SUPPORT SERVICE $105,496.34 15121000

POLICE-RECORDS

745500

POSTAGE AND FREIGHT
11/19/2025 186704 QUADIENT FINANCE USA INC $362.36 2025-10/24 BPO/ACCT 7900044081162129 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186582 STERICYCLE, INC. $143.22 8012540194 BPO/DOCUMENT SHREDDING 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$87.86 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 15121000 - POLICE-RECORDS $593.44
15122000
POLICECOMMUNICATIONS

760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$114.63 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 15122000 - POLICE-COMMUNICATIONS $114.63 15130000

POLICE-OPERATIONS

730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186632 ED JONES CO $1,133.40 59316 SERGEANT BADGES - JAIME/M 741300

SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE

11/5/2025 186316 COPWARE, INC $1,270.00 87334 LEGAL SOURCEBOOK SITE LIC 741300

SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE

11/5/2025 186463 THOMSON REUTERS- WEST OR
WEST
$623.44 852602962 BPO/SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE
744000

OFFICE EXPENSE MISC
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$70.34 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
744000

OFFICE EXPENSE MISC
11/5/2025 186399 OFFICE DEPOT (CONTRACT) $455.13 37898151 2025-09 - CONSOLIDATED FO 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186435 SPEAKWRITE LLC $948.00 255560ba 2025-10 SPEAKWRITE DICTAT PAGE 23 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
15130000

POLICE-OPERATIONS

749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186565 LEMOORE SPORTSMANS CLUB $8,830.00 1203-2025 RANGE MEMBERSHIP 749502

TUITION
11/19/2025 186629 RAYMOND DIAS $567.25 89554 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT - I 759000

RENTS AND LEASES -
VEHICL
11/20/2025 1974 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST $3,359.57 FBN5483203 LEASE CHARGES/UNIT 2684HT 759000

RENTS AND LEASES -
VEHICL
11/20/2025 1975 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST $23,705.86 FBN5469978 26QZWW/ZWV/ZX4/ZX6/ZXB/ZX 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$590.56 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
826026

LESS LETHAL SHOTGUNS
11/5/2025 186368 L C ACTION POLICE SUPPLY $14,224.27 60567 LESS LETHAL SHOTGUNS DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 15130000 - POLICE-OPERATIONS $55,777.82 15130001

MEAS H PD

OPERATIONS
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$37.77 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186297 AXON ENTERPRISES INC $3,125.91 INUS390091 MEAS H CSO BODY CAMERAS - 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186368 L C ACTION POLICE SUPPLY $2,844.85 60517 MEAS H LESS LETHAL SHOTGU DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 15130001 - MEAS H PD OPERATIONS $6,008.53 15140000

POLICE-TRAFFIC

ENFORCEMNT
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186385 BRENT MCCREARY $162.02 FY26-PPE MOTOR UNIT GLASSES&GLOVES DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 15140000 - POLICE-TRAFFIC ENFORCEMNT $162.02 15180000

POLICE-ANIMAL

CONTROL
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186546 HANFORD VETERINARY

HOSPITAL, INC
$105.58 1309367 BPO/ANIMAL CONTROL VET SE
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186546 HANFORD VETERINARY

HOSPITAL, INC
$369.81 1309380 BPO/ANIMAL CONTROL VET SE
PAGE 24 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
15180000

POLICE-ANIMAL

CONTROL
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186546 HANFORD VETERINARY

HOSPITAL, INC
$173.00 1309381 BPO/ANIMAL CONTROL VET SE
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186546 HANFORD VETERINARY

HOSPITAL, INC
$109.99 1309564 BPO/ANIMAL CONTROL VET SE
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186546 HANFORD VETERINARY

HOSPITAL, INC
$199.99 1309565 BPO/ANIMAL CONTROL VET SE
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186546 HANFORD VETERINARY

HOSPITAL, INC
$139.99 1309686 BPO/ANIMAL CONTROL VET SE
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186546 HANFORD VETERINARY

HOSPITAL, INC
$189.99 1309791 BPO/ANIMAL CONTROL VET SE
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186546 HANFORD VETERINARY

HOSPITAL, INC
$139.99 1310111 BPO/ANIMAL CONTROL VET SE
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186546 HANFORD VETERINARY

HOSPITAL, INC
$139.99 1310112 BPO/ANIMAL CONTROL VET SE
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186546 HANFORD VETERINARY

HOSPITAL, INC
$189.99 1310115 BPO/ANIMAL CONTROL VET SE
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186644 HANFORD VETERINARY

HOSPITAL, INC
$400.00 1310114 BPO/ANIMAL CONTROL VET SE
DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 15180000 - POLICE-ANIMAL CONTROL $2,158.32 15190001

MEAS H PD HART

760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186368 L C ACTION POLICE SUPPLY $2,844.86 60517 MEAS H LESS LETHAL SHOTGU 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186538 CORE BUSINESS INTERIORS $12,417.02 35013 HART BUILDING FURNITURE DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 15190001 - MEAS H PD HART $15,261.88 15200000

POLICE-CANINE

749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186338 K-9 SERVICES LLC $1,500.00 HPD-11 BPO/MONTHLY K9 TRAINING PAGE 25 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
15200000

POLICE-CANINE

749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186546 HANFORD VETERINARY

HOSPITAL, INC
$55.99 1309370 BPO/K9 VET SERVICES
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186546 HANFORD VETERINARY

HOSPITAL, INC
$928.23 1309385 BPO/K9 VET SERVICES AND F
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186338 K-9 SERVICES LLC $321.75 HPD-12 MUZZLE FOR K9 ACE 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186546 HANFORD VETERINARY

HOSPITAL, INC
$172.00 1309385 BPO/K9 VET SERVICES AND F
DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 15200000 - POLICE-CANINE $2,977.97
16100000
FIREADMIN/SUPPRESSIO
N
732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186439 U S TELEPACIFIC CORP $317.40 187764676-0 PHONE SERVICE 10/23-11/22 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/14/2025 186587 T-MOBILE USA INC $1,005.99 206883295 2025-10 2025-10 ACCT 206883295 CE 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/19/2025 186598 A T & T $349.45 287301186711X110
225
BPO/ACCT 287301186711 INT
732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/19/2025 186721 TARGET SOLUTIONS LEARNING
LLC
$848.70 INV120667 TRAINING CATALOG FOR FIRE
741200

EQUIPMENT

MAINTENANCE
11/14/2025 186560 L N CURTIS & SONS $477.88 INV1001561 BPO/FIRE EQUIPMENT MAINTE 741200

EQUIPMENT

MAINTENANCE
11/14/2025 186586 T S I INC $1,478.24 91989400 BPO/MAINTENANCE, SERVICIN 741200

EQUIPMENT

MAINTENANCE
11/19/2025 186605 BAUER COMPRESSORS INC $476.30 0000342518 CHEMICALS FOR EXTRACTOR 741400

BUILDING MTCE INTERNAL
CO
11/5/2025 186344 RUSSELL DEAN HAYES $225.00 793099 MAINTENANCE ON GARAGE DOO
741400

BUILDING MTCE INTERNAL
CO
11/14/2025 186507 AMERICAN INCORPORATED $999.96 7192520 BPO/ A.C & ICE MACHINE EQ 741400

BUILDING MTCE INTERNAL
CO
11/14/2025 186566 LOWE'S $71.90 2025-09 2025-09 - CONSOLIDATED FO PAGE 26 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
16100000
FIREADMIN/SUPPRESSIO
N
744000

OFFICE EXPENSE MISC
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$1,273.44 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
744000

OFFICE EXPENSE MISC
11/5/2025 186399 OFFICE DEPOT (CONTRACT) $83.08 37898151 2025-09 - CONSOLIDATED FO 745000

PUBLICATIONS AND DUES

11/19/2025 186718 SKYFIRE AI, INC $1,500.00 1029 HFD CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186335 GEOINOVO SOLUTIONS INC. $23,277.50 487 ON-CALL GIS IMPLEMENTATIO 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186458 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $109.53 2580616943 BPO/PD & FIRE FLOOR MATS 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186458 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $131.31 2580616950 BPO/PD & FIRE FLOOR MATS 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186575 ORKIN SERVICES OF
CALIFORNIA, INC.
$48.00 283168761 2025-10 PEST CONTROL ST#2
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186575 ORKIN SERVICES OF
CALIFORNIA, INC.
$48.00 283173038 2025-10 PEST CONTROL ST#3
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186593 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $132.22 2580619540 BPO/PD & FIRE FLOOR MATS 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186593 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $50.00 2580620076 BPO/PD & FIRE FLOOR MATS 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186593 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $126.54 2580620071 BPO/PD & FIRE FLOOR MATS 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186593 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $131.31 2580623232 BPO/PD & FIRE FLOOR MATS 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186593 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $109.53 2580623225 BPO/PD & FIRE FLOOR MATS 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186593 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $132.22 2580625793 BPO/PD & FIRE FLOOR MATS PAGE 27 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
16100000
FIREADMIN/SUPPRESSIO
N
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186593 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $126.54 2580626265 BPO/PD & FIRE FLOOR MATS 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186593 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $50.00 2580626269 BPO/PD & FIRE FLOOR MATS 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186657 KENT M KAWAGOE, PH D $1,225.00 HFD-OCT2025 PSYCH EVALUATIONS FOR NEW 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$226.57 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186550 HD SUPPLY, INC. $80.41 872040472 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186550 HD SUPPLY, INC. $223.92 894002682 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186550 HD SUPPLY, INC. $152.47 894826882 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186550 HD SUPPLY, INC. $155.19 894969757 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186550 HD SUPPLY, INC. $555.11 900727371 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186550 HD SUPPLY, INC. $138.39 900948118 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186551 HD SUPPLY, INC. $8.04 893086413 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186566 LOWE'S $520.35 2025-08 2025-08SUPPLIES - CONSOLI 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/19/2025 186664 TIM J LAW $800.00 25-185 3 MEAS H FIREFIGHTERS & 1 PAGE 28 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
16100000
FIREADMIN/SUPPRESSIO
N
767100

CERT/EXPLORERS

EXPENSE
11/14/2025 186585 STATIM TECHNOLOGIES LLC $5,250.00 1104251 POLARBREEZE MACHINE - CER 767100

CERT/EXPLORERS

EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186646 MSTS (AKA HARBOR FREIGHT

COMMERCIAL)
$1,779.89 ca44d244 GENERATOR AND ACCESSORIES
777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/14/2025 186541 ELITE COMMAND TRAINING
CORP
$14,998.00 55 ELITE COMMAND TRAINING
777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/19/2025 186640 GREEN BOX RENTALS, INC $412.50 26014 SHIPPING OF TRAINING CONT 777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/19/2025 186682 MORGAN & SLATES $240.67 1851603 MATERIAL FOR ACADEMY TRAI 777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/19/2025 186711 MATTHEW ROWE $67.00 REFUND FOR GAS
CONF

REFUND FOR M ROWE GAS TRV
778500

UTILITIES-GAS
11/7/2025 1996 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO $391.52 2025-10 2025-10 GAS SERVICE 799500

OPERATIONAL CAPITAL
OUTLA
11/5/2025 186351 J ' S COMMUNICATIONS, INC $2,461.43 72887 Batteries for portable ra 799500

OPERATIONAL CAPITAL
OUTLA
11/14/2025 186511 BAUER COMPRESSORS INC $6,191.91 0000342754 FIREFIGHTING GLOVES 799500

OPERATIONAL CAPITAL
OUTLA
11/19/2025 186601 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC $579.08 268596 TURN OUT BOOTS FOR SUPPRE 826021

AUTO EXTRICATION EQ
11/14/2025 186560 L N CURTIS & SONS $4,185.38 INV992654 HURST- 2 AUTO EXTRICATION DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 16100000 - FIRE-ADMIN/SUPPRESSION $74,222.87 16100001

MEAS H FIRE

ADMIN/SUPPRESSIO
N
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/19/2025 186657 KENT M KAWAGOE, PH D $1,225.00 HFD-OCT2025 PSYCH EVALUATIONS FOR NEW 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/19/2025 186664 TIM J LAW $2,400.00 25-185 3 MEAS H FIREFIGHTERS & 1 DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 16100001 - MEAS H FIRE ADMIN/SUPPRESSION $3,625.00 PAGE 29 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
16110000

FIRE-FIRE

PREVENTION
732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/19/2025 186598 A T & T $93.19 287301186711X110
225
BPO/ACCT 287301186711 INT
744000

OFFICE EXPENSE MISC
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$42.50 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
744000

OFFICE EXPENSE MISC
11/14/2025 186584 STAPLES DEPT11-0007061138 $265.70 7007493697 OFFICE SUPPLIES 745000

PUBLICATIONS AND DUES

11/19/2025 186610 CALIF CONF OF ARSON

INVESTIGATORS
$400.00 HCFD2025-26 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL COSTA
777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/19/2025 186625 DAN JENNINGS $135.00 TRV 2025 10/21-23 TRV FRESNO 2025 10/21-23 777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/19/2025 186663 GARCIA, LARRY $135.00 TRV 2025 10/21-23 TRV FRESNO 2025 10/21-23 800123

SOFTWARE/LICENSES
11/5/2025 186447 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC $6,292.00 025-474950 MOBILE EYES ANNUAL SAAS F 800123

SOFTWARE/LICENSES
11/5/2025 186447 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC $6,292.00 025-523187 MOBILE EYES ANNUAL SAAS F 800123

SOFTWARE/LICENSES
11/5/2025 186447 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC ($12,584.00) 025-527617 CREDIT REF. INV#025-47495 DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 16110000 - FIRE-FIRE PREVENTION $1,071.39 17100000

PARKS & COMM

SERV-ADMIN
732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186439 U S TELEPACIFIC CORP $55.20 187764676-0 PHONE SERVICE 10/23-11/22 744000

OFFICE EXPENSE MISC
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$403.90 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
744000

OFFICE EXPENSE MISC
11/5/2025 186399 OFFICE DEPOT (CONTRACT) $230.53 37898151 2025-09 - CONSOLIDATED FO 777000

TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETIN
G
11/14/2025 186542 ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR $517.41 40323608 2025-10 CAR RENTAL DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 17100000 - PARKS & COMM SERV-ADMIN $1,207.04 17110000

PARKS & COMM

SERV-SPORTS
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186312 JESSE CHAVARRIA $192.00 89355 SOFTBALL COMPLEX UMPIRE 1 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186323 EVAN DUTRA $1,435.50 89354 SOFTBALL COMPLEX MAINTENA PAGE 30 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
17110000

PARKS & COMM

SERV-SPORTS
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186332 KEYSHAWN FIGUEROA-LANE $354.75 89379 SOFTBALL CONCESSIONS 10.1 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186337 GILBERT ESCALANTE $96.00 89353 SOFTBALL UMPIRE 10.21 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186353 JARROD KING $990.00 89350 SOFTBALL COMPLEX MAINTENA 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186370 RODNEY LAWRENCE $64.00 89359 SOFTBALL UMPIRE 10.21 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186381 PRADO, MARTIN $96.00 89364 SOFTBALL UMPIRE 10.21 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186382 AIKO MASUDA $1,200.00 89369 SOFTBALL CONCESSIONS 10.1 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186383 AVALYNN MASUDA $445.50 89378 SOFTBALL CONCESSIONS 10.1 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186387 BRANDEN MEDINA $478.50 89384 SOFTBALL CONCESSIONS 10.1 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186388 BRIANNA MEDINA $561.00 89383 SOFTBALL CONCESSIONS 10.1 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186418 PRADO, SAL $315.00 89352 SOFTBALL COMPLEX UMPIRE 1 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186419 PRESTON LEE KING $1,501.50 89376 SOFTBALL MAINTENANCE 10.1 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186423 SYDNEY REIS $346.50 89381 SOFTBALL CONCESSIONS 10.1 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186424 RODRIGUEZ, CHRISTIAN $214.50 89374 SOFTBALL CONCESSIONS 10.1 PAGE 31 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
17110000

PARKS & COMM

SERV-SPORTS
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186426 TRISTAN RODRIGUEZ $198.00 89372 SOFTBALL CONCESSIONS 10.1 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186444 TIMOTHY MC WEBSTER JR $2,106.00 89361 SOFTBALL COMPLEX MAINTENA 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186607 BENJAMIN JAMES GRAHAM $128.00 89645 SOFTBALL UMPIRE 10.28-11. 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186614 JESSE CHAVARRIA $96.00 89644 SOFTBALL UMPIRE 10.27 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186627 DAYON L. DILLIHUNT $192.00 89647 SOFTBALL UMPIRE 10.28-11. 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186630 DUSTIN PEST CONTROL INC $75.00 223755456 BPO/PEST CONTROL SVC MULT 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186631 EVAN DUTRA $1,650.00 89637 SOFTBALL MAINTENANCE AND 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186634 LUKE FAGUNDES $800.00 89628 SOFTBALL CONCESSIONS 11.0 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186635 KEYSHAWN FIGUEROA-LANE $462.00 89638 SOFTBALL CONCESSIONS 11.0 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186638 GILBERT ESCALANTE $576.00 89643 SOFTBALL 10.23-11.06 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186655 JARROD KING $990.00 89642 SOFTBALL MAINTENANCE 10.2 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186667 RODNEY LAWRENCE $96.00 89639 SOFTBALL UMPIRE 11.04 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186668 CODY SKAGGS $576.00 89641 SOFTBALL UMPIRE 10.27-11.

PAGE 32 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
17110000

PARKS & COMM

SERV-SPORTS
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186673 PRADO, MARTIN $96.00 89640 SOFTBALL UMPIRE 10.28 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186674 AIKO MASUDA $1,180.00 89633 SOFTBALL CONCESSIONS 10.2 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186675 AVALYNN MASUDA $544.50 89634 SOFTBALL CONCESSIONS 11.0 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186678 BRANDEN MEDINA $544.50 89635 SOFTBALL CONCESSIONS 10.2 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186679 BRIANNA MEDINA $544.50 89636 SOFTBALL CONCESSIONS 10.2 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186701 PRADO, SAL $630.00 89648 SOFTBALL UMPIRE 10.27-11. 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186702 PRESTON LEE KING $1,617.00 89649 SOFTBALL MAINTENANCE 10.2 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186707 SYDNEY REIS $412.50 89627 SOFTBALL CONCESSIONS 11.0 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186709 RODRIGUEZ, CHRISTIAN $132.00 89632 SOFTBALL CONCESSIONS 10.3 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186710 TRISTAN RODRIGUEZ $165.00 89630 SOFTBALL CONCESSIONS 11.0 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186724 TIMOTHY MC WEBSTER JR $2,376.00 89629 SOFTBALL PREP 10.27-11.09 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186566 LOWE'S $782.82 2025-09 2025-09 - CONSOLIDATED FO 767500

SOFTBALL COMPLEX

EXPENSES
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$61.02 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
PAGE 33 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
17110000

PARKS & COMM

SERV-SPORTS
767500

SOFTBALL COMPLEX

EXPENSES
11/5/2025 186310 CALIF TURF EQUIPMENT &

SUPPLY INC
$211.04 686296 GOPHER TRAPS FOR SOFTBALL
767500

SOFTBALL COMPLEX

EXPENSES
11/5/2025 186347 HD SUPPLY, INC. $78.46 898260245 FOAM PINK LOTION SOAP 767500

SOFTBALL COMPLEX

EXPENSES
11/5/2025 186369 SCHAUB RENTAL AND SALES
INC
$25.00 33123 LABOR
767500

SOFTBALL COMPLEX

EXPENSES
11/5/2025 186464 WEST VALLEY SUPPLY INC $229.86 120211 SUPPLIES FOR SB COMPLEX 767500

SOFTBALL COMPLEX

EXPENSES
11/14/2025 186518 CALIF TURF EQUIPMENT &

SUPPLY INC
$1,619.16 692753 SEASONAL SEEDING FOR THE
767500

SOFTBALL COMPLEX

EXPENSES
11/14/2025 186550 HD SUPPLY, INC. $78.46 900334202 FOAM PINK LOTION SOAP 767500

SOFTBALL COMPLEX

EXPENSES
11/19/2025 186612 CALIF TURF EQUIPMENT &

SUPPLY INC
$394.26 686707 ABI FORCE FIELD MACHINE T
768000

CONCESSION SUPPLIES
11/5/2025 186305 BOTTLING GROUP, LLC $636.58 19091506 SOFTBALL CONCESSIONS DRIN 768000

CONCESSION SUPPLIES
11/5/2025 186438 SYSCO CENTRAL CALIFORNIA,
INC.
$2,149.65 484708369 SOFTBALL CONCESSION FOOD
768000

CONCESSION SUPPLIES
11/5/2025 186438 SYSCO CENTRAL CALIFORNIA,
INC.
$1,697.38 484690401 SOFTBALL CONCESSION FOOD
768000

CONCESSION SUPPLIES
11/5/2025 186438 SYSCO CENTRAL CALIFORNIA,
INC.
$2,331.15 484725268 SOFTBALL CONCESSION FOOD
768000

CONCESSION SUPPLIES
11/5/2025 186438 SYSCO CENTRAL CALIFORNIA,
INC.
$1,369.04 484717098 SOFTBALL CONCESSION FOOD
768000

CONCESSION SUPPLIES
11/14/2025 186581 US FOODS, INC. $634.92 3612365 SOFTBALL COMPLEX. CONCESS 768000

CONCESSION SUPPLIES
11/19/2025 186609 BOTTLING GROUP, LLC $457.28 10430002 PEPSI PRODUCT FOR SOFTBAL 768000

CONCESSION SUPPLIES
11/19/2025 186609 BOTTLING GROUP, LLC $487.13 10866005 PEPSI PRODUCT FOR SOFTBAL 768000

CONCESSION SUPPLIES
11/19/2025 186609 BOTTLING GROUP, LLC $457.28 73289005 PEPSI PRODUCT FOR SOFTBAL PAGE 34 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
17110000

PARKS & COMM

SERV-SPORTS
768000

CONCESSION SUPPLIES
11/19/2025 186609 BOTTLING GROUP, LLC $417.90 38053003 PEPSI PRODUCT FOR SOFTBAL 768000

CONCESSION SUPPLIES
11/19/2025 186609 BOTTLING GROUP, LLC $546.67 40908008 PEPSI PRODUCT FOR SOFTBAL 768000

CONCESSION SUPPLIES
11/19/2025 186719 SMART & FINAL CORP $2,543.69 2025-10 SB COMPLEX CONCESSION STA DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 17110000 - PARKS & COMM SERV-SPORTS $41,686.50 17160000

PARKS & COMM

SERV-FACILITIES
732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186274 A T & T $33.38 24192157 ACCT#9391033912 COE/LONGF 741400

BUILDING MTCE INTERNAL
CO
11/19/2025 186643 HANFORD GLASS, INC $10,491.00 026385 REPLACE STORE FRONT DOORS 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186311 CALIFITNESS INC $295.00 43423 LONGFIELD FITNESS CENTER 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/7/2025 1980 COMCAST CABLE

COMMUNICATIONS, INC
$269.04 0714199 11/25 ACCT 8155 50 039 0714199
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186532 COMCAST BUSINESS $185.08 254540021 2025-10 INTERNET SERVICE749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186533 COMCAST BUSINESS $182.34 251959540 2025-09 INTERNET SERVICE749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186534 COMCAST BUSINESS $182.34 249518585 2025-08 INTERNET SERVICE749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186535 COMCAST BUSINESS $150.61 254540023 2025-10 INTERNET SERVICE749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186536 COMCAST BUSINESS $148.38 251959544 2025-09 INTERNET SERVICE749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/14/2025 186537 COMCAST BUSINESS $148.38 249518587 2025-08 INTERNET SERVICE760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$64.94 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
PAGE 35 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
17160000

PARKS & COMM

SERV-FACILITIES
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186347 HD SUPPLY, INC. $945.47 897718425 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186347 HD SUPPLY, INC. $107.60 897849089 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186457 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $101.01 5031639216 BPO/CUST 890041001 LONGFI 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186592 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $101.01 5031645173 BPO/CUST 890041001 LONGFI 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/19/2025 186665 SCHAUB RENTAL AND SALES
INC
$3,084.10 33699 EMERGENCY-DISPATCH GENERA
778500

UTILITIES-GAS
11/7/2025 1996 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO $109.66 2025-10 2025-10 GAS SERVICE DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 17160000 - PARKS & COMM SERV-FACILITIES $16,599.34 17190000
PARKS & COMM SERYOUTH SERVICE
732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186439 U S TELEPACIFIC CORP $41.40 187764676-0 PHONE SERVICE 10/23-11/22 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186440 T-MOBILE USA INC $70.48 210044613 2025-10 2025-10 ACCT. #210044613 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186425 CINDY LYNN RODRIGUEZ $336.00 89316 OCT. AEROBICS INSTRUCTION 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$764.07 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
767604
B&GC 04 NGO CONTRACTS
PRO
11/14/2025 186514 BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF

TULARE COUNTY
$14,351.42 11051 BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB NGO S
767611
B&GC 11 INDIRECT COSTS
PR
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$1,401.00 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
767611
B&GC 11 INDIRECT COSTS
PR
11/5/2025 186399 OFFICE DEPOT (CONTRACT) $502.52 37898151 2025-09 - CONSOLIDATED FO DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 17190000 - PARKS & COMM SER-YOUTH SERVICE $17,466.89 PAGE 36 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
17210000

PARKS & COMM

SERV-COMM

PROM/EV
732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186439 U S TELEPACIFIC CORP $13.80 187764676-0 PHONE SERVICE 10/23-11/22 756000

ADVERTISING & PUBLIC
REL
11/14/2025 186545 SANTA MARIA CALIFORNIA

NEWS MEDIA INC
$320.00 10251044 OCTOBER FRONT PAGE AD AGR
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$426.36 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/19/2025 186719 SMART & FINAL CORP $828.36 2025-10 SB COMPLEX CONCESSION STA 761100

RENAISSANCE FAIRE

EXPENSE
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$10.70 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
761110

ICE RINK EXPENSES
11/5/2025 186294 AMARQUEZDESIGN $3,500.00 3BPMATWM-0001 WINTER WONDERLAND

WEBSITE
761110

ICE RINK EXPENSES
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$5,721.12 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
761110

ICE RINK EXPENSES
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$732.85 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
761110

ICE RINK EXPENSES
11/5/2025 186313 MICHAL CHRISSAKIS $400.00 89070 WINTER WONDERLAND DESIGN 761110

ICE RINK EXPENSES
11/5/2025 186357 PHILLIP J GAPEN $10.83 10813 KEY COPIES. WWL. 761110

ICE RINK EXPENSES
11/7/2025 1996 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO $14.79 2025-10 2025-10 GAS SERVICE 761110

ICE RINK EXPENSES
11/14/2025 186544 GRAINGER, INC $366.71 9702556383 BALLOON WORK LIGHT DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 17210000 - PARKS & COMM SERV-COMM PROM/EV $12,345.52 17220000

PARKS & COMM

SERV-PARKS
730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/5/2025 186457 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $82.63 5031639226 BPO/ACCT 2322940000 UNIFO 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/14/2025 186513 BOOT BARN $219.20 INV00535217 FY26 SAFETY SHOES/JOSHUA 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/14/2025 186592 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $77.11 5031642202 BPO/ACCT 2322940000 UNIFO 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186720 STADRI EMBLEMS $184.22 483520 DEPARTMENT UNIFORM PATCHE
PAGE 37 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
17220000

PARKS & COMM

SERV-PARKS
730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186720 STADRI EMBLEMS $70.13 483493 COH LOGO UNIFORM PATCHES 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186728 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $57.11 5031645183 BPO/ACCT 2322940000 UNIFO 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186728 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $54.41 5031630272 BPO/ACCT 2322940000 UNIFO 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186729 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $34.12 27594642 UNIFORM BLUE JACKETS 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186729 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $56.87 27580032 UNIFORM BLUE JACKETS 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186729 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $16.20 27563693 UNIFORM BLUE JACKETS 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186439 U S TELEPACIFIC CORP $13.80 187764676-0 PHONE SERVICE 10/23-11/22 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186440 T-MOBILE USA INC $471.33 992424539 2025-10 ACCT#992424539 P&CS CELL 744000

OFFICE EXPENSE MISC
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$200.64 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
749502

TUITION
11/5/2025 186466 LEVI E WINEBRENNER $1,364.00 FY26 TUITION Q1 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT MG 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/14/2025 186559 KINGS REHABILITATION

CENTER, INC
$2,500.00 1064 2025-07 MOWING SOC-COM
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186347 HD SUPPLY, INC. $940.15 899275523 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186347 HD SUPPLY, INC. $651.88 899413173 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186348 HOFMANS NURSERY $165.62 12188 NURSERY SUPPLIES FOR PARK 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186369 SCHAUB RENTAL AND SALES
INC
$44.00 833475 BPO/PARKS EQUIPMENT PARTS
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186558 KINGS CO PIPE & SUPPLY $2.90 2032160 BPO IRRIGATION SUPPLIES PAGE 38 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
17220000

PARKS & COMM

SERV-PARKS
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186558 KINGS CO PIPE & SUPPLY $12.25 2032186 BPO IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186561 SCHAUB RENTAL AND SALES
INC
$438.22 33681 BPO/PARKS EQUIPMENT PARTS
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186566 LOWE'S $166.46 2025-08 2025-08SUPPLIES - CONSOLI 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186566 LOWE'S $1,495.59 2025-09 2025-09 - CONSOLIDATED FO 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/19/2025 186682 MORGAN & SLATES $159.27 1845270 BPO/PARK REPAIR SUPPLIES 795500
TAXES
11/5/2025 186360 KINGS CO TAX COLLECTOR $3,243.24 89341 PROPERTY TAX 822649

HEROES PARK
11/5/2025 186389 MELTON DESIGN GROUP, INC. $75,930.00 6840 concept design consultant 825613

HANFORD GOES GREEN
PROJEC
11/5/2025 186322 DUDEK $22,611.25 202508663 TREE CANOPY AND INVENTORY 825613

HANFORD GOES GREEN
PROJEC
11/20/2025 1975 ENTERPRISE FM TRUST $1,517.75 FBN5469978 26QZWW/ZWV/ZX4/ZX6/ZXB/ZX DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 17220000 - PARKS & COMM SERV-PARKS $112,780.35 17502091

INTERMODAL

FACILITY OPER
755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/5/2025 186277 A T & T $59.71 24192161 9391033917-TRAIN STATION 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/5/2025 186319 DAVID MATTOS $1,225.00 9429 2025-11 WKND& HOLIDAY CLE 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/5/2025 186457 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $14.00 5031636202 BPO/WWTP & BLG MAINT FLOO 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/5/2025 186457 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $44.81 5031639218 BPO/WWTP & BLG MAINT FLOO PAGE 39 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
17502091

INTERMODAL

FACILITY OPER
755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/5/2025 186457 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $14.00 5031642194 BPO/WWTP & BLG MAINT FLOO 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/19/2025 186728 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $44.81 5031633242 BPO/WWTP & BLG MAINT FLOO 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/19/2025 186728 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $14.00 5031648150 BPO/WWTP & BLG MAINT FLOO DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 17502091 - INTERMODAL FACILITY OPER $1,416.33 17502100

BUILDING

MAINTENANCE
730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/5/2025 186366 JASON ALLEN BRANDON DBA $225.00 41543 FY26 SAFETY SHOES - STEPH 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/5/2025 186457 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $23.02 5031639227 BPO/ACCT 2322940000 UNIFO 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/5/2025 186457 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $23.02 5031642203 BPO/ACCT 2322940000 UNIFO 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/14/2025 186592 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $23.02 5031645184 BPO/ACCT 2322940000 UNIFO 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/14/2025 186592 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $19.50 5031630273 BPO/ACCT 2322940000 UNIFO 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186720 STADRI EMBLEMS $29.22 483493 COH LOGO UNIFORM PATCHES 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186729 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $14.22 27594642 UNIFORM BLUE JACKETS 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186729 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $23.69 27580032 UNIFORM BLUE JACKETS 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186729 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $6.75 27563693 UNIFORM BLUE JACKETS 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186275 A T & T $59.71 24192160 9391033915-CORP YARD ALAR 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186276 A T & T $61.27 24211726 ACCT#9391033916 CITY HALL 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186280 A T & T $61.27 24192168 ACCT#9391033924 CALNET- P 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186288 A T & T $61.27 24192173 ACCT#9391033930 CALNET- P 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186439 U S TELEPACIFIC CORP $41.40 187764676-0 PHONE SERVICE 10/23-11/22 PAGE 40 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
17502100

BUILDING

MAINTENANCE
755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/5/2025 186296 AMERICAN INCORPORATED $474.38 7191134 REPAIR WORK CITY HALL ICE 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/5/2025 186296 AMERICAN INCORPORATED $2,450.00 5337472 REPAIR CITY HALL HVAC UNI 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/5/2025 186327 MESA ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. $2,225.00 962026403 BOILER MAINTENANCE CONTRA 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/5/2025 186397 NICK CHAMPI ENTERPRISES INC $1,250.00 29173 REPAIR DAMAGED TRACK PAD 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/5/2025 186397 NICK CHAMPI ENTERPRISES INC $4,250.00 29174 INSTALL NEW SENSOR LOOPS 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/5/2025 186445 TOTAL FILTRATION SERVICES,
INC
$114.04 2822420-00 BPO/FILTRATION SUPPLIES A
755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/5/2025 186445 TOTAL FILTRATION SERVICES,
INC
$376.06 2822437-00 BPO/FILTRATION SUPPLIES A
755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/5/2025 186445 TOTAL FILTRATION SERVICES,
INC
$406.38 2822439-00 BPO/FILTRATION SUPPLIES A
755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/5/2025 186445 TOTAL FILTRATION SERVICES,
INC
$262.60 2822441-00 BPO/FILTRATION SUPPLIES A
755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/5/2025 186445 TOTAL FILTRATION SERVICES,
INC
$132.73 2822401-00 BPO/FILTRATION SUPPLIES A
755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/5/2025 186457 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $57.72 5031642190 BPO/WWTP & BLG MAINT FLOO 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/5/2025 186457 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $70.78 5031642193 BPO/WWTP & BLG MAINT FLOO 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/5/2025 186465 WILSON FIRE SPRINKLER CO,
INC.
$500.00 10877 ANNUAL FIRE SP INSP CORP
PAGE 41 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
17502100

BUILDING

MAINTENANCE
755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/14/2025 186592 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $70.78 5031630263 BPO/WWTP & BLG MAINT FLOO 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/19/2025 186599 ALARM PROGRAM SYSTEMS LLC $75.00 INV-25-5539361 ALARM FEES 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/19/2025 186599 ALARM PROGRAM SYSTEMS LLC $50.00 INV-25-5539343 ALARM FEES 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/19/2025 186599 ALARM PROGRAM SYSTEMS LLC $15.00 INV-25-5610796 ALARM FEES 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/19/2025 186602 AMERICAN INCORPORATED $3,714.44 5337784 REPAIR UNIT 18 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/19/2025 186602 AMERICAN INCORPORATED $1,960.00 5337801 REPAIR UNIT #16 CITY HALL 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/19/2025 186602 AMERICAN INCORPORATED $1,320.00 5337774 REPAIR PD AC UNIT 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/19/2025 186602 AMERICAN INCORPORATED $779.58 7193273 REPAIR AC UNIT #14 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/19/2025 186630 DUSTIN PEST CONTROL INC $20.00 223738088 BPO/PEST CONTROL SVC MULT 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/19/2025 186630 DUSTIN PEST CONTROL INC $35.00 223741641 BPO/PEST CONTROL SVC MULT 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/19/2025 186630 DUSTIN PEST CONTROL INC $35.00 223742854 BPO/PEST CONTROL SVC MULT 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/19/2025 186630 DUSTIN PEST CONTROL INC $35.00 223741549 BPO/PEST CONTROL SVC MULT 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/19/2025 186630 DUSTIN PEST CONTROL INC $55.00 223742896 BPO/PEST CONTROL SVC MULT PAGE 42 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
17502100

BUILDING

MAINTENANCE
755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/19/2025 186630 DUSTIN PEST CONTROL INC $35.00 223767253 BPO/PEST CONTROL SVC MULT 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/19/2025 186630 DUSTIN PEST CONTROL INC $35.00 223766964 BPO/PEST CONTROL SVC MULT 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/19/2025 186630 DUSTIN PEST CONTROL INC $35.00 223767508 BPO/PEST CONTROL SVC MULT 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/19/2025 186630 DUSTIN PEST CONTROL INC $35.00 223768276 BPO/PEST CONTROL SVC MULT 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/19/2025 186630 DUSTIN PEST CONTROL INC $90.00 223770403 BPO/PEST CONTROL SVC MULT 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/19/2025 186656 JONES-WALBAUM

CORPORATION
$2,209.97 835921 EQUIPMENT ADD ON FOR SURE
755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/19/2025 186728 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $57.72 5031648146 BPO/WWTP & BLG MAINT FLOO 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$1,709.32 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186339 GRAINGER, INC $94.18 9687961889 BPO/SUPPLIES FOR REPAIRIN 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186339 GRAINGER, INC $218.41 9689647262 BPO/SUPPLIES FOR REPAIRIN 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186343 MSTS (AKA HARBOR FREIGHT

COMMERCIAL)
($75.75) 428eecd6 REF. INVOICE #f7c460a4
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186343 MSTS (AKA HARBOR FREIGHT

COMMERCIAL)
$490.85 b2f44f85 BPO/SUPPLIES/TOOLS NEEDED
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186346 HD SUPPLY, INC. $162.27 895005007 HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES PAGE 43 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
17502100

BUILDING

MAINTENANCE
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186346 HD SUPPLY, INC. ($205.03) 895003689 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186346 HD SUPPLY, INC. $58.24 897076139 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186346 HD SUPPLY, INC. $82.70 897321246 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186346 HD SUPPLY, INC. $52.63 895644706 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186346 HD SUPPLY, INC. $430.84 896037215 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186346 HD SUPPLY, INC. $204.56 896037272 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186346 HD SUPPLY, INC. $646.25 896217817 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186346 HD SUPPLY, INC. $36.78 896217858 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186346 HD SUPPLY, INC. $24.00 897700217 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186346 HD SUPPLY, INC. $25.03 897733770 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186346 HD SUPPLY, INC. $59.51 898169545 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186346 HD SUPPLY, INC. $32.42 898487442 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186347 HD SUPPLY, INC. $1,315.06 896888427 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES PAGE 44 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
17502100

BUILDING

MAINTENANCE
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186347 HD SUPPLY, INC. $56.64 897043287 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186358 KINGS CO PIPE & SUPPLY $82.35 10714 BPO/PIPES & SUPPLIES NEED 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186361 BRANDON K AINSWORTH $86.60 20260 ENGINEERS NAME PLATES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186386 CONSOLIDATED ELEC DIST, INC $307.96 2877-1050259 BPO/ELECTRICAL SERVICES R 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186547 MSTS (AKA HARBOR FREIGHT

COMMERCIAL)
$66.00 2d49c1ed BPO/SUPPLIES/TOOLS NEEDED
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186549 HD SUPPLY, INC. $57.13 900563701 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186552 HD SUPPLY, INC. $127.62 901349282 BPO/HOME DEPOT SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186568 CONSOLIDATED ELEC DIST, INC $97.75 2877-1050369 BPO/ELECTRICAL SERVICES R 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186568 CONSOLIDATED ELEC DIST, INC $183.87 2877-1050388 BPO/ELECTRICAL SERVICES R 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186568 CONSOLIDATED ELEC DIST, INC $326.48 2877-1050456 BPO/ELECTRICAL SERVICES R 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/19/2025 186676 CONSOLIDATED ELEC DIST, INC $45.43 2877-1050261 BPO/ELECTRICAL SERVICES R 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/19/2025 186676 CONSOLIDATED ELEC DIST, INC $11.02 2877-1050479 BPO/ELECTRICAL SERVICES R 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/19/2025 186676 CONSOLIDATED ELEC DIST, INC $10.83 2877-1050526 BPO/ELECTRICAL SERVICES R PAGE 45 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
17502100

BUILDING

MAINTENANCE
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/19/2025 186706 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES

DISTRIBUTOR
$297.80 35385193-00 BPO/HVAC SUPPLIES & EQUIP
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/19/2025 186706 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES

DISTRIBUTOR
$64.10 35385195-00 BPO/HVAC SUPPLIES & EQUIP
778500

UTILITIES-GAS
11/7/2025 1996 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO $499.90 2025-10 2025-10 GAS SERVICE 826032
(32)8FT FOLDING/
(18)ROUND
11/19/2025 186681 MITY-LITE, INC $17,071.16 00194252 REPLACE TABLE INVENTORY F DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 17502100 - BUILDING MAINTENANCE $48,659.45 17502131

COURTHOUSE

SQUARE FACIL
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186278 A T & T $31.41 24192163 ACCT#9391033919 COURT HOU 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186384 MATSON ALARM COMPANY, INC $107.04 6845236 COH-COURTHOUSE SERVICE CA 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186630 DUSTIN PEST CONTROL INC $35.00 223739208 BPO/PEST CONTROL SVC MULT 778500

UTILITIES-GAS
11/7/2025 1996 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO $60.88 2025-10 2025-10 GAS SERVICE DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 17502131 - COURTHOUSE SQUARE FACIL $234.33 20100000

ENGINEERING

730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/5/2025 186457 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $8.28 5031639220 BPO/ACCT 2322940000 UNIFO 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/5/2025 186457 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $8.28 5031642196 BPO/ACCT 2322940000 UNIFO 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186720 STADRI EMBLEMS $17.53 483493 COH LOGO UNIFORM PATCHES 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186728 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $40.00 5031645177 BPO/ACCT 2322940000 UNIFO 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186728 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $8.28 5031630266 BPO/ACCT 2322940000 UNIFO 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186729 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $8.53 27594642 UNIFORM BLUE JACKETS 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186729 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $14.22 27580032 UNIFORM BLUE JACKETS PAGE 46 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
20100000

ENGINEERING

730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186729 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $4.05 27563693 UNIFORM BLUE JACKETS 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186439 U S TELEPACIFIC CORP $248.40 187764676-0 PHONE SERVICE 10/23-11/22 733800

SPECIAL-LITIGATION
EXPENS
11/5/2025 186437 STENO AGENCY, INC. $694.00 2112911 ESTATE OF LUZ A. SOTO V. 740000

FLEET MAINTENANCE
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$313.30 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
744000

OFFICE EXPENSE MISC
11/5/2025 186399 OFFICE DEPOT (CONTRACT) $261.22 37898151 2025-09 - CONSOLIDATED FO 747000

PRINTING
11/19/2025 186626 DATAFLOW BUSINESS

SYSTEMS, INC
$8.62 437476 BPO/ACCT CO0000-071 OKI P
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186335 GEOINOVO SOLUTIONS INC. $172.50 487 ON-CALL GIS IMPLEMENTATIO 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186350 INTERWEST CONSULTING
GROUP
$3,737.50 2516252 2025-09 CITY SURVEYOR SER
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186350 INTERWEST CONSULTING
GROUP
$8,797.50 2448816 CITY SURVEYOR SERVICES
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186649 INTERWEST CONSULTING
GROUP
$2,070.00 2684459 CITY SURVEYOR SERVICES
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$416.33 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/19/2025 186716 STERICYCLE, INC. $117.02 8012539591 BPO/DOCUMENT SHREDDING 800121

COMPUTER/MDT/MONITOR

11/5/2025 186320 DELL MARKETING LP $2,776.01 10841335537 LAPTOP - DELL PRO MAX 16 DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 20100000 - ENGINEERING $19,721.57
20110000

PW-STREET

MAINTENANCE
730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/5/2025 186457 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $45.87 5031639221 BPO/ACCT 2322940000 UNIFO 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/14/2025 186592 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $45.87 5031645178 BPO/ACCT 2322940000 UNIFO PAGE 47 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
20110000

PW-STREET

MAINTENANCE
730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/14/2025 186592 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $45.87 5031630267 BPO/ACCT 2322940000 UNIFO 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186720 STADRI EMBLEMS $184.22 483520 DEPARTMENT UNIFORM PATCHE
730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186720 STADRI EMBLEMS $70.13 483493 COH LOGO UNIFORM PATCHES 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186729 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $34.12 27594642 UNIFORM BLUE JACKETS 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186729 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $56.87 27580032 UNIFORM BLUE JACKETS 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186729 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $16.20 27563693 UNIFORM BLUE JACKETS 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186439 U S TELEPACIFIC CORP $27.60 187764676-0 PHONE SERVICE 10/23-11/22 744000

OFFICE EXPENSE MISC
11/5/2025 186399 OFFICE DEPOT (CONTRACT) $507.68 37898151 2025-09 - CONSOLIDATED FO 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$10.81 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186355 K R C SAFETY CO INC $349.32 71158 BPO/PARTS & SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186355 K R C SAFETY CO INC $2,031.12 71157 BPO/PARTS & SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186355 K R C SAFETY CO INC $539.03 70844 BPO/PARTS & SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186391 MILLER'S RENTALAND $67.81 833635 PARTS & SUPPLIES-PROPANE 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186436 STATEWIDE TRAFFIC SAFETY &

SIGNS INC
$3,565.22 04012855 BPO/PARTS AND SUPPLIES
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186566 LOWE'S $145.65 2025-08 2025-08SUPPLIES - CONSOLI PAGE 48 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
20110000

PW-STREET

MAINTENANCE
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186566 LOWE'S $662.42 2025-09 2025-09 - CONSOLIDATED FO 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/19/2025 186651 J A MOMANEY SERVICES INC $3,464.00 196795 BPO/PARTS & SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/19/2025 186651 J A MOMANEY SERVICES INC $2,533.05 196796 BPO/PARTS & SUPPLIES 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/19/2025 186682 MORGAN & SLATES $62.10 1850819 BPO/PARTS & SUPPLIES 772000

STREET CONST & MAINT
MTRL
11/5/2025 186329 ENNIS PAINT INC $3,446.02 486366 BPO/PAINT & MATERIALS 772000

STREET CONST & MAINT
MTRL
11/5/2025 186380 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS
INC
$4,738.55 47569909 BPO/MATERIAL/ASPHALT
778000

UTILITIES-ELECTRICITY
11/5/2025 186309 CALIF DEPT OF

TRANSPORTATION
$8,166.37 SL260051 BPO/SIGNAL & LIGHTING
DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 20110000 - PW-STREET MAINTENANCE $30,815.90 20310000

REFUSE OPERATIONS

730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/5/2025 186304 BOOT BARN $225.00 INV00535211 FY26 SAFETY SHOES/JOHN BA 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/5/2025 186457 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $115.59 5031639222 BPO/ACCT 2322940000 UNIFO 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/5/2025 186457 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $114.73 5031642198 BPO/ACCT 2322940000 UNIFO 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/5/2025 186459 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $8.73 5031639219 BPO/ACCT 890172782 REFUSE 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/5/2025 186459 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $8.73 5031642195 BPO/ACCT 890172782 REFUSE 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/14/2025 186592 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $114.73 5031645179 BPO/ACCT 2322940000 UNIFO 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/14/2025 186592 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $140.87 5031630268 BPO/ACCT 2322940000 UNIFO 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/14/2025 186594 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $8.73 5031645176 BPO/ACCT 890172782 REFUSE PAGE 49 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
20310000

REFUSE OPERATIONS

730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/14/2025 186594 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $8.73 5031630265 BPO/ACCT 890172782 REFUSE 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186720 STADRI EMBLEMS $184.21 483520 DEPARTMENT UNIFORM PATCHE
730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186720 STADRI EMBLEMS $163.65 483493 COH LOGO UNIFORM PATCHES 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186729 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $79.62 27594642 UNIFORM BLUE JACKETS 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186729 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $132.69 27580032 UNIFORM BLUE JACKETS 730000

UNIFORM EXPENSE
11/19/2025 186729 VESTIS GROUP, INC. $37.79 27563693 UNIFORM BLUE JACKETS 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186439 U S TELEPACIFIC CORP $55.20 187764676-0 PHONE SERVICE 10/23-11/22 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/5/2025 186440 T-MOBILE USA INC $522.76 993747413 2025-10 PUBLIC WORKS CELL CHARGES 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/14/2025 186588 T-MOBILE USA INC $6.66 995871713 2025-10 ACCT 995871713 BLDG VANS/ 732000

COMMUNICATIONS
11/19/2025 186727 VERIZON WIRELESS $38.37 6127438412 ACCT 771937214-00003 741200

EQUIPMENT

MAINTENANCE
11/19/2025 186682 MORGAN & SLATES $83.08 1852339 BPO/EQUIPMENT MTCE 741200

EQUIPMENT

MAINTENANCE
11/19/2025 186682 MORGAN & SLATES $11.43 1852330 BPO/EQUIPMENT MTCE 741200

EQUIPMENT

MAINTENANCE
11/19/2025 186682 MORGAN & SLATES $81.13 1852266 BPO/EQUIPMENT MTCE 744000

OFFICE EXPENSE MISC
11/5/2025 186399 OFFICE DEPOT (CONTRACT) $507.67 37898151 2025-09 - CONSOLIDATED FO 749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186363 KINGS INDUSTRIAL OCCUP

MEDICAL CTR
$100.00 310601 PHYSICAL EXAM DOT
749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/5/2025 186428 S C A OF CA, LLC $89,005.64 2025-010094 BPO/COH STREET SWEEPING S PAGE 50 OUT OF 78

DIVISION/ORG
CODE

ACCOUNT/OBJECT
CODE
CHECK
DATE
CHECK

NUMBER VENDOR NAME AMOUNT INVOICE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
20310000

REFUSE OPERATIONS

749500

PROF AND SPEC SERVICES
11/19/2025 186705 R3 CONSULTING GROUP, INC. $23,892.50 124914 REF RATE STUDY & OPERATIO 755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/5/2025 186367 KINGS WASTE & RECYCLE

AUTHORITY
$256,652.30 2025-09 2025-09 TIPPING FEES
755000

OTHER CONTRACTUAL

SERVICE
11/19/2025 186661 KINGS WASTE & RECYCLE

AUTHORITY
$269,109.41 2025-10 TIPPING FEES
758000

RENTS AND LEASES-EQUIP

11/5/2025 186342 HAAKER EQUIP CO $9,742.50 INV20003 REFUSE TRUCK EQ RENTAL 758000

RENTS AND LEASES-EQUIP

11/19/2025 186642 HAAKER EQUIP CO $9,742.50 INV15152 REFUSE TRUCK EQ RENTAL 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186295 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICE,
INC.
$37.55 1V61-374K-T9L3 2025-10 AMAZON PURCHASES
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186357 PHILLIP J GAPEN $8.66 10755 BPO/KEYS
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186357 PHILLIP J GAPEN $108.25 10791 BPO/KEYS 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/5/2025 186357 PHILLIP J GAPEN $12.99 10799 BPO/KEYS
760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186566 LOWE'S $492.63 2025-08 2025-08SUPPLIES - CONSOLI 760000

SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL
EXP
11/14/2025 186566 LOWE'S $249.68 2025-09 2025-09 - CONSOLIDATED FO DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 20310000 - REFUSE OPERATIONS $661,804.71 20370000

REFUSE CAPITAL &

RESERVES
825001

REF SOLAR COMPACTORS

11/5/2025 186302 BIG BELLY SOLAR LLC $15,329.05 59723 REFUSE RECYCLING COMPACTO DIVISION/ORG TOTAL 20370000 - REFUSE CAPITAL & RESERVES $15,329.05 PAGE 51 OUT OF 78