Hanford City Council
March 3, 2026

City Council Meeting
Agenda
March 3, 2026
7:00 PM – Regular Meeting
Council Chambers
400 N. Douty St.

Council Members will meet in-person in the Council
Chambers. The meeting will also be lived streamed on the City’s website: http://livestream.hanford.city/

4:00 PM CALL TO ORDER STUDY SESSION AND CLOSED SESSION:

ROLL CALL BY THE CITY CLERK:

PUBLIC COMMENT:

Study Sessions are considered Special Meetings under the Brown Act. Accordingly, comments from the public are limited to items listed on the agenda (GC 54954.3a). Public Comment will be accepted during each agenda item. A maximum of three minutes is allowed for each speaker. Please begin your comments by stating your name and providing your city of residence.

STUDY SESSION:

A. Review of the Draft Environmental Justice Element and Project Presentation with Mintier Harnish
B. Review and Comment on the 2026 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Annual Action Plan
CLOSED SESSION FOR DISCUSSION OF THE FOLLOWING:

A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (GC 54956.9(d)(4)) Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: 6 Cases B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS (GC 54956.8) APNs: 012045001, 012045010, 012045004, 012045005, 012046019, 012046005, 012046006, 012046007, 012045001, 012045009, 012045008, 012045007, 012045006, 012045007
Negotiating Party: Solis Martin Vieyra & Araujo Fanny Castro, Miya Farms, PRE 4 LLC,

MCMASTER, WILLIAM T & KATHLEEN S H/W, EBERT JEANNINE, ALANIS, RICHARD &

LINDA TRUST,
Agency Negotiators: Chris Tavarez, Jason Waters, and Nick Matoian

CALL TO ORDER REGULAR SESSION:

ROLL CALL:

INVOCATION:

Pastor Bobby Guerra
FLAG SALUTE:

CLOSED SESSION ACTION REPORT:

RECOGNITION:

A. Badge Pinning Ceremony and Oath of Office for Officers Brandon Barrera, Efrain Nieto, Sean Snodgrass, Nancy Gallegos, and Francisco Segoviano PUBLIC COMMENT:

This is the time for citizens to comment on subject matters within the jurisdiction of the Hanford City Council. This is also the public’s opportunity to request an item from the Consent Calendar be pulled for discussion purposes or to comment on any item on the agenda. State law does not allow the Council to discuss or take action on issues not on the agenda, except that members of the Council or staff may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons exercising their public testimony rights (Gov. Code sec. 54954.2). A maximum of three minutes is allowed for each speaker. Please begin your comments by stating your name and providing your city of residence.

CONSENT CALENDAR:

Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these matters unless a request is made and then the item will be removed from the Consent Calendar to be discussed and voted upon by a separate motion.

A. Waive reading in full of resolutions and ordinances and approval and adoption of same by reading the title only.

B. City Clerk: Approval of the Minutes of the February 3, 2026 Meeting C. Community Development: Authorization to Submit HOME Investment Partnership Program Income Application
D. Community Development: Adopt a Resolution Approving a Historic Resources Application for 325 N. Douty Street (APN 010-276-001) – Superior Dairy E. Police: Authorization to apply for the FY 26/27 Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program (CTFGP) through the California Highway Patrol (CHP) in the amount of $164,380.73 to be used for DUI enforcement overtime costs, purchase of a DUI checkpoint command trailer, a Ford F150 vehicle, and DUI checkpoint equipment.

F. Public Works: Authorization for the City Manager to execute a service contract for Annual Chemical Supply Services to Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc., of Sacramento, CA, in the amount of $124,629.00 with an option to renew for two additional one-year terms G. Public Works: Approval of the purchase of two (2) 2026 Chevrolet EV trucks from Keller Chevrolet of Hanford, CA and required upfitting from Cooks Communication for a total cost of $166,765 and an appropriation of $36,765 from Measure H Capital Projects fund to fully cover the cost.

H. Utilities and Engineering: Award of a contract in the amount of $248,808.80 for the replacement of the Bayoxide Media Filter at Well 50 located at the corner of Hanford- Armona and 9th Avenue

I. Public Works: Authorization for the City Manager to award a construction contract for The Plunge Mechanical Repairs to Oasis Pool and Spa, of Visalia, CA, in the amount of $161,815.00.

PUBLIC HEARING:

A. Utilities and Engineering: Formation of Community Facilities District No. 2026-3 (Public Maintenance Services)
GENERAL BUSINESS:

A. Administration: Presentation by Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Gross & Leoni LLP on past year in review and 2026 outlook for state legislative efforts B. Administration: Approval of the Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement with Escrow Instructions and Authorization for the Mayor and City Manager to Execute Necessary Documents for the Purchase of Kings County Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 012-046-006, 012-046-007, 012-045-004, 012-045-005, and 012-045-010 from Miya Farms, Inc.

COUNCIL REPORTS/GENERAL REPORTS:

Brief information-only reports from City Council and/or Staff, including committee reports and reports by City Council related to meetings attended at City expenses (AB1234).

ITEMS FOR FUTURE AGENDAS:

At this time, any Council Member may ask a question for clarification or may request a matter, which is not otherwise scheduled on a City Council agenda, to be placed on a future agenda. The Council Member referring the item shall provide sufficient information as to the nature of the item. The City Council, by concurrence of a majority, may direct the City Manager to put the item on a future agenda. (GOV. CODE SEC. 54954.2) A. Council Future Agenda Items
B. Upcoming Events and Important Dates:

March 17: Regular City Council Meeting
March 24: Special Meeting for Council Strategic Planning Workshop March 30–April 3: Kids Spring Camp Register Here
April 3: Easter Egg Hunt in Civic Park More Information April 7: Regular City Council Meeting
April 21: Regular City Council Meeting
ADJOURNMENT:

Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available to public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office located at 319 N. Douty Street, Hanford, California 93230, during normal business hours. Such agendas are also available at the city’s website, www.cityofhanfordca.com subject to staff’s ability to post the agenda before the meeting. If you need a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s office, 559-585-2515, 319 N. Douty Street, Hanford, California 93230, at least 2 days prior to the meeting {28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II}

4.A.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 3/3/2026 AGENDA SECTION: STUDY SESSION

SUBJECT:

Review of the Draft Environmental Justice Element and Project Presentation with Mintier Harnish

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: Provide input on the Draft Environmental Justice Element.

BACKGROUND:

In March 2025, the City of Hanford initiated a project to prepare its first ever Environmental Justice Element of the City’s General Plan in compliance with the Planning for Healthy Communities Act of 2016 (Senate Bill 1000). This project is one component of a larger project also aiming to draft Objective Design Standards for single family residential development and update Subdivision Regulations for the City and is funded through the REAP 2.0 Local Suballocation Grant Program.

Mintier Harnish was selected as the consulting firm to prepare project documents.

This goal of the Environmental Justice (EJ) Element is to establish goals and policies that address health, equity, and environmental hazards in Hanford. A central component of the EJ Element is identifying disadvantaged communities in Hanford (referred to as the Community of Focus) which are areas of the city that experience higher levels of environmental and socioeconomic vulnerabilities.

The EJ Element assesses public health issues and environmental hazards both citywide and specific to Hanford’s Community of Focus across six main topic areas: pollution exposure, healthy food access, physical activity and healthy lifestyles, civic engagement, access to public facilities, and housing.

Outreach for this project has included a variety of online and in-person engagement strategies to gain a better understanding of the issues and concerns facing the community around health and equity.

From June 2025 through October 2025, Mintier Harnish and City staff facilitated six in-person outreach events including meetings with local community-based organizations (CBOs), a community workshop, and several “pop-up” booths at local events such as Hanford Night Out and the Hanford Night Market. The outreach program also included a community survey which was available online from June 2025 through November 2025 and available at all in-person events. All outreach events and the community survey offered Spanish translation and were promoted through the City’s website, social media platforms, and through coordination with CBOs.

Included with this agenda item are the draft Environmental Justice Element and associated presentation. At this stage, staff is presenting a complete draft of the Environmental Justice Element as well as any input received from the community and other City departments. The final Environmental Justice Element will be brought to the Planning Commission and City Council for

formal approval at a later date. Once adopted, this document will be added as a chapter to the City’s General Plan.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund. The project is fully funded by a REAP 2.0 grant, administered through the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Environmental Justice Element Study Session Draft

ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ELEMENT

CITY COUNCIL

STUDY SESSION DRAFT

CITY OF HANFORD

Prepared for:

315 North Douty Street
Hanford, California 93230

Consultant:

1415 20th Street
Sacramento, California 95815
Contact: Michael Gibbons, Project Manager
Phone: (916) 446-0522

Table of Contents

General Plan Update ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Description Page No.

CHAPTER 9 ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE .................................................. 1

9.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1

9.2 Background and Context ...................................................................................................... 10

9.3 Public Participation................................................................................................................ 18

9.4 Community Profile and Demographics ............................................................................ 21

9.5 Environmental Justice Concerns ........................................................................................ 28

9.6 Goals and Policies ................................................................................................................... 79

Table of Contents

General Plan Update iii

This page is intentionally left blank.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 1
CHAPTER 9
Environmental Justice

9.1 Introduction

9.1.1 What is Environmental Justice
The State of California defines Environmental Justice as “the fair treatment of people of all races, cultures, and incomes with respect to the development, adoption, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies” (California Government Code Section 65040.12). “Fair treatment” means no group of people should bear a disproportionate share of the negative environmental consequences resulting from industrial, governmental, and commercial operations, and policies.

While it is the hope that all people have convenient access to safe housing, clean environments, adequate community services, and healthy foods, the reality doesn’t always align. Today, and throughout California history, low-income residents, communities o f color, tribal nations, and immigrant communities , and other historically marginalized communities often bear a disproportionately large burden of exposure to environmental hazards and health risks. Conditions in these communities can be traced to a varie ty of factors such as underinvestment, inequitable land use and zoning policies, and lack of meaningful public engagement with community residents. Environmental justice seeks to remedy this imbalance based on the democratic values of fairness and equity. This Environmental Justice Element addresses public health risks and environmental justice concerns both citywide and for those residents living in Hanford’s Community of Focus.

9.1.2 Relationship to Other General Plan Elements
The Planning for Healthy Communities Act of 2016 (Senate Bill 1000) was enacted to address environmental justice at both local and regional levels. This legislation requires cities and counties to incorporate policies that promote environmental justice in their general plans. The purpose of Hanford’s Environmental Justice Element is to promote equitable access to resources and reduce environmental risks for disadvantaged communities. As provided by State Government Code 65302(h), the Environmental Justice Element has the same weight as the other mandatory elements of the General Plan and shall be internally consistent with all other elements.

The goals and policies in this Environmental Justice Element align with and expand upon those found in other elements of the General Plan. Environmental justice is a crosscutting topic, and in most cases, jurisdictions already address many of its core conc erns—such as housing, public health, transportation, and access to services—within other General Plan elements. To clearly demonstrate this relationship and document the

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

2 City of Hanford
policies that support environmental justice outcomes, a list of relevant policies from other General Plan elements is included. Other Elements in the General Plan that include policies that closely relate to environmental justice include the following:
• Land Use & Community Design Element. Designates the type, intensity, and general distribution of land uses, including housing, business, industry, open space, education, public buildings and grounds, waste disposal facilities, and other categories of public and private uses.

This Element is found in Chapter 3 of both the General Plan Background Report and Policy Document. The City’s most recent Land Use & Community Design Element was adopted in 2017.
• Transportation & Circulation Element. Correlates with the Land Use & Community Design Element and identifies the general location and extent of existing and proposed major thoroughfares, transportation routes, and terminals for all modes of transportation. This Element is found in Chapter 4 of both the General Plan Background Report and Policy Document. The City’s most recent Transportation & Circulation Element was adopted in 2017. • Open Space, Conservation & Recreation Element. Addresses the conservation, development, and use of natural resources, including water and soils, as well as encourages the development and maintenance of parks and recreational spaces to enhance the physical health and well -being of residents. This Elemen t is found in Chapter 5 of both the General Plan Background Report and Policy Document. The City’s most recent Open Space, Conservation & Recreation Element was adopted in 2017.
• Public Facilities & Services. Identifies publicly owned facilities and service infrastructure. This Element sets policies to facilitate continued service to the community as it grows and develops, citywide school site planning, law enforcement and fire protection services, sewer and wa ter infrastructure, and other local public facilities and buildings. This Element is found in Chapter 6 of both the General Plan Background Report and the Policy Document. The City’s most recent Public Facilities & Services Element was adopted in 2017. • Health, Safety & Noise Element. Establishes policies and programs to protect the community from risks associated with seismic, geologic, flood, extreme heat, and fire hazards. Additionally, this Element identifies and appraises noise problems within the community and forms the basis for land use distribution. This Element is found in Chapter 7 of both the General Plan Background Report and Policy Document. The City’s most recent Health, Safety & Noise Element was adopted in 2017.
• 2016 – 2024 Joint Kings County Housing Element. Ensures that there is sufficient residential capacity available to meet the minimum resident needs established by the State for various income levels. This joint countywide Housing Element is a separate document that aims to address regional housing needs through a collaborative approach between all of the jurisdictions in Kings County. The Housing Element assesses current and future housing needs as well as opportunities and constraints on housing production. The goals, policies, and programs outlined in the Housing Element focus on conserving existing housing and neighborhoods, encouraging housing production, removing or mitigating governmental constraints to housing production,

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 3
providing housing assistance, and furthering equal housing opportunities. This joint Housing Element was adopted in 2016.

Many environmental justice -oriented policies are already present in other General Plan elements.

Table 9-1:, below, provides a list of these policies. The goals and policies in the Environmental Justice Element aim to fill the gaps in other General Plan elements and ensure the General Plan fully addresses the environmental justice needs of the community.

Table 9-1: Policies in Other Elements Supporting Environmental Justice Policy
Number Policy Page
Number
Land Use & Community Design Element
Policy L41 Location and Size of the High Density Residential Land Use Designation.

Locate High Density Residential land use designations in close proximity to Arterial streets, commercial centers, recreational facilities, and employment centers.
31 Policy L85 Location of Light Industrial Land Use Designation. Locate Light Industrial land use designations south of Houston Avenue to serve as a land use buffer between Residential and Heavy Industrial land use designations.

Locations north of Houston Avenue that are near rail lines or that have access to Arterial streets, are also allowed when they do not result in land use compatibility conflicts.
39 Policy L91 Incompatible Adjacent Land Uses. Prohibit the establishment of Residential and other sensitive land uses near Heavy Industrial land use designations.
40 Policy L108 Transit-Oriented Development. Support high-density transit oriented development within the city’s Downtown, Mixed Use Corridors, and at the intersections of major thoroughfares to improve transit ridership and to reduce automobile use, traffic congestion, and greenhouse gas emissions
45 Policy L109 Mixed-Use Neighborhoods. Encourage the integration of a variety of compatible land uses into new and established neighborhoods to provide residents with convenient access to goods, services, parks and recreation, and other community amenities.
45 Policy L111 Complete Neighborhoods. Promote efforts to make new and existing neighborhoods more complete by encouraging the development of a mix of complementary uses and amenities that meet the daily needs of residents. Such uses and amenities may include parks, community centers, religious institutions, daycare centers, libraries, schools, community gardens, and neighborhood commercial and mixed-use developments.
45 Policy L114 Services and Facilities. Include easily accessible services and facilities within each neighborhood to meet the daily needs of neighborhood 46

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

4 City of Hanford
Table 9-1: Policies in Other Elements Supporting Environmental Justice Policy
Number Policy Page
Number
residents. Most residents should live within a ½ mile walking distance of schools, parks and retail services.

Policy L115 Housing Diversity. Encourage residential developments to have households with a diverse range of income levels.
46 Policy L120 Encroachment of Incompatible Land Uses. Protect residential neighborhoods from the encroachment of land uses that may have a negative impact on the residential living environment.
46 Policy L159 Eastside Neighborhood Park. Plan for a new neighborhood park site with a flexible location south of Grangeville Boulevard and within a five- to ten- minute walk of most residents in the East Side Planning Area. 55 Policy L164 Northwest Neighborhood Park. Plan for two new neighborhood park sites with flexible locations within a five- to ten- minute walk of most residents in the Northwest Side Planning Area
55 Policy L169 Learning Center Neighborhood Parks. Develop two neighborhood parks within the Learning Center Planning Area with flexible locations within a five to ten minute walk of most residents in the Learning Center Planning Area, one south of Lacey Boulevard and the other north of Grangeville Boulevard.
56 Policy L173 Southwest Neighborhood Parks. Support development of two new neighborhood park sites identified in existing approved tentative subdivision maps within the Southwest Planning Area.
57 Transportation & Circulation Element
Policy T26 Cul-de-sac Non-motorized Connectivity. Encourage sidewalks and breaks in perimeter walls to allow pedestrian, bicycle, and visual access from cul-de-sac streets to other nearby streets
65 Policy T37 Shade Trees in Planter Strips. Where adequate space permits, include street trees planted in planter strips between the curb and sidewalk to shade paved street surfaces.
66 Policy T39 Accommodating All Modes of Traffic. Plan, design, and construct new transportation improvement projects to safely accommodate the needs of pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, motorists and persons of all abilities.
66 Policy T40 Pedestrian and Bicycle Placemaking. Promote pedestrian and bicycle improvements that improve connectivity between neighborhoods, provide opportunities for distinctive neighborhood features, and foster a greater sense of community.
66 Policy T43 Safe Routes to Schools Programs. Promote Safe Routes to Schools programs for all schools serving the city.
67

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 5
Table 9-1: Policies in Other Elements Supporting Environmental Justice Policy
Number Policy Page
Number
Policy T54 KART Expansion. Pursue improvements and funding to increase transit ridership, increase transit frequencies on key corridors, and expand regular transit service in portions of Hanford that currently have no public transit.
69 Policy T56 Improve Access to Transit Stops. Remove physical barriers to improve access to transit facilities for the elderly, disabled, and other transit- dependent groups.
69 Policy T58 Vanpool Programs. Support the KART Vanpool program for the area’s farmworkers and other commuters.
69 Policy T64 Bicycle Network Master Planning. Maintain a Bicycle Master Plan to coordinate existing and planned infrastructure to support, encourage and promote bicycle transportation, with effective connections to downtown, major shopping areas, mixed use neighborhoods, community facilities, schools, parks, and employment areas
70 Policy T65 Bicycle Network. Prioritize the elimination of gaps in the bicycle network to connect destinations across Hanford.
70 Policy T70 Pedestrian Connections. Increase connectivity through direct and safe pedestrian connections to public amenities, neighborhoods, village centers and other destinations throughout the city.
71 Policy T71 Pedestrian and Bicycle Crossings. Identify and enhance key pedestrian and bicycle crossings that cross physical barriers, such as highways or railroad tracks.
71 Policy T79 Multi-modal Connection to Amtrak. Support multi-modal access to and from the existing Amtrak station.
72 Policy T92 Amenities that Support Alternative Modes of Transportation.

Encourage new developments to include on-site amenities into that support alternative modes of transportation. Emphasize pedestrian and bicycle-friendly design, accessibility to transit, preferred rideshare parking, showers and lockers, on-site food service, and child care, where appropriate.
74 Open Space, Conservation & Recreation Element
Policy O37 Mature Trees. Promote the preservation of existing mature trees and encourage the planting of appropriate shade trees in new developments. 84 Policy O51 Provision of Parkland. Acquire and develop new parks consistent with the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan.
88 Policy O55 Mini-Parks. Allow mini-parks between 0.25 acres to 1.0 acre in size to be built at locations that are easily accessed by the residents of the neighborhood. Mini-parks do not contribute to the citywide park ratio 88

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

6 City of Hanford
Table 9-1: Policies in Other Elements Supporting Environmental Justice Policy
Number Policy Page
Number
goal and are considered an optional addition, and not an alternative to neighborhood and community parks.

Policy O57 Neighborhood Parks. Establish neighborhood parks generally between 2 and 5 acres in size at locations easily accessed by residents of the neighborhood.
90 Policy O59 Neighborhood Parks and Schools. Whenever possible, new neighborhood parks shall be developed in conjunction with elementary schools.
90 Policy O60 Community Parks. Establish community parks generally between 10 and 20 acres in size.
90 Policy O63 Special Use Parks. Provide special use parks based on community needs. 90 Policy O67 Private Recreational Space. Adopt minimum standards for the development of private recreational space for new multi-family residential projects.
91 Policy O68 Variety of Recreational Programs. Provide a variety of recreational programs that accommodate all age groups and abilities. 91 Public Facilities & Services Element
Policy P34 Police Station. Provide for additional structures and acquire additional land as needed for an expanded police station with adequate police vehicle parking to maintain acceptable response times to meet new population growth.
99 Policy P53 Fire Protection Personnel. Provide adequate fire suppression personnel and staff at each fire station to meet increased demands from population growth.
102
Policy P75 Public Access to Technology. Encourage all residents have access to library services including access to computers and other technology. 105
Policy P81 Health Care Services. Support hospitals, clinics, shelters, and other medical services that meet the health care needs of Hanford’s residents. 106
Policy P82 Child and Adult Care Services. Support and encourage the provision of child and adult care services.
106
Health, Safety & Noise Element
Policy H7 Disaster Preparedness for Special Needs Populations. Identify and develop communication systems, evacuation methods, shelter locations and other services for special needs populations.
108
Policy H18 Extreme Heat Emergency Plan. Support the maintenance and implementation of the Kings County Extreme Heat Emergency Plan to support vulnerable populations during times of extreme heat. 110

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 7
Table 9-1: Policies in Other Elements Supporting Environmental Justice Policy
Number Policy Page
Number
Policy H19 Cooling Centers. Periodically evaluate the effectiveness of existing cooling centers and determine the need for additional cooling centers as population increases.
110
Policy H24 Warming Centers. Periodically evaluate the effectiveness of warming center and determine the need for additional warming center as population increases.
111
Policy H31 Adequate Separation from Sensitive Uses. Require adequate separation between industrial areas where hazardous materials are present and sensitive uses such as schools, residential areas, parks, and public facilities.
113
Policy H38 Brownfield Site Inventory and Remediation Policies. Coordinate with property owners and the California Department of Toxic Substance Control to inventory brownfields and develop plans and policies to remediate contamination.
114
Policy H52 Access to Fresh Produce. Promote the availability of fresh fruits, vegetables, and other healthy foods.
124
Policy H53 Land Use Zones that Encourage Healthy Food Sales. Designate land use zones that allow convenience stores, supermarkets, and neighborhood markets that stock nutritional food choices in every existing and planned neighborhood.
124
Policy H54 Farmers Markets. Encourage year-round operation of farmers’ markets with the Downtown as the locational preference.
124
Policy H55 Healthy Food Choices. Support schools and other organizations’ efforts to encourage students and their families to make healthy food choices. 124
Policy H56 Heath Programs, Grants, and Incentives. Consider programs and incentives to encourage small grocery or convenience stores to sell fresh foods in underserved areas. These programs could include grants or loans to purchase updated equipment (e.g. refrigeration), publicity or directories of healthy food outlets, or connecting stores to wholesale sources of healthy, local, or organic food.
124
Policy H57 Community Gardens. Where practical, dedicate and/or encourage space for community gardens in parks or other appropriate sites. 124
Policy H58 Local Foods for City Functions. Encourage the purchase of local foods for City functions, and encourage school districts to do the same. 125
Policy H59 Health Initiatives. Facilitate the involvement of community residents, businesses, and organizations in the development, adoption, and implementation of community health initiatives.
125
Policy H60 Health and Land Use Decisions. Consider environmental justice issues as they are related to potential health impacts associated with land use decisions, including enforcement actions, to reduce the adverse health 125

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

8 City of Hanford
Table 9-1: Policies in Other Elements Supporting Environmental Justice Policy
Number Policy Page
Number
effects of hazardous materials, industrial activities, and other undesirable land uses on residents regardless of age, culture, ethnicity, gender, race, socioeconomic status, or geographic location.

Policy H61 Public Amenities. Consider environmental justice issues as they are related to the equitable provision of desirable public amenities such as parks, recreational facilities, and other beneficial uses that improve the quality of life.
125
Policy H62 Public Participation. Assure that all community residents have opportunities to participate in decisions that affect their environment and health, and make accommodations for them to be involved in the decision-making processes.
125
Policy H63 Use of Communication Tools, New Media, and Technology. Use traditional communication tools as well as new media and technology to provide clear and current information on City processes and decisions and to encourage public participation in City government. 125
Policy H64 Opportunities for Physical Activities. Improve health and mental well- being by offering convenient and safe opportunities for physical activity. 126
Policy H65 Comfortable Walking and Biking Environments. Provide comfortable environments and destinations for walking and bicycling to integrate physical activity into daily routines.
126
2016 – 2024 Joint Kings County Housing Element
Policy 1.4 Preserve assisted rental housing for long-term occupancy by low- and moderate-income households.
5-1
Policy 2.2 Work collaboratively with nonprofit and for-profit developers to seek state and federal grants to support the production of affordable housing. 5-2
Policy 4.1 Support the provision of rental assistance to provide affordable housing options for extremely-low-, very-low- and low-income households. 5-2
Policy 4.2 Participate in efforts to expand homeownership opportunities to lower- and moderate-income households through downpayment assistance and other homeownership programs.
5-2
Policy 4.3 Support the provision of housing suitable for special needs groups, including seniors, people with disabilities, homeless people, military personnel, large households, single-parent families, and farmworkers. 5-3
Policy 4.4 Develop and maintain collaborative efforts among nonprofits, for-profit developers, and public agencies to encourage the development, maintenance, and improvement of housing.
5-3
Policy 5.1 Support enforcement of fair housing laws prohibiting arbitrary discrimination in the development, financing, rental, or sale of housing. 5-3

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 9
Table 9-1: Policies in Other Elements Supporting Environmental Justice Policy
Number Policy Page
Number
Policy 5.2 Periodically review City ordinances and development regulations and modify, as necessary, to accommodate housing for disabled persons. 5-3

9.1.3 Scope
This Element contains goals and policies designed to enhance the participation and empowerment of historically marginalized populations, referred to in this Element as the “Community of Focus." This Environmental Justice Element addresses public health risks and environmental justice con cerns citywide and for those residents living in Hanford’s Community of Focus. The goals and policies of this Element focus on the following areas:
• Reducing pollution exposure and improving air and water quality. • Promoting healthy food access.
• Promoting physical activity and healthy lifestyles.
• Promoting “civic engagement” in the public decision-making process. • Promoting public and recreational facilities.
• Promoting safe and sanitary homes.
• Prioritizing improvements and programs that address the needs of Community of Focus.

9.1.4 Content of the Environmental Justice Element
To aid in the understanding of environmental justice and how the city will address environmental justice concepts, this Element is organized as follows:
• Introduction. This section provides a brief overview of environmental justice concepts and the statutory obligation for communities. A discussion on the content and scope of this Environmental Justice Element is also provided.
• Background. This section discusses environmental justice principles and the methodology for identifying a Community of Focus within the Hanford city limits. This section also identifies the location of the Hanford Community of Focus.
• Public Participation. A key principle of environmental justice is engaging communities most impacted by pollution burden and other environmental justice factors. This section summarizes the community outreach and publicity strategy employed for this effort . A full summary of comments received throughout the public participation process can be found in Appendix A.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

10 City of Hanford
• Community of Focus: Context and Demographics. This section identifies the Hanford Community of Focus and provides an evaluation of baseline (2023) demographic data for each census tract in the Community of Focus. Data analyzed in this section includes race and ethnicity, household income and poverty status, educational attainment, spok en language, English proficiency, and age.
• Environmental Justice Concerns. This section provides an evaluation of baseline (2023) environmental issues within the Hanford Community of Focus including pollution exposure, healthy food access, physical activity, public facilities, safe and sanitary housing, and civic engagement.
• Goals and Policies. The goals and policies described in this section establish how the City will incorporate environmental justice into decision making and support positive outcomes for affected residents.

9.2 Background and Context

9.2.1 Statutory Requirements
Senate Bill (SB) 1000 (California Government Code Section 65302(h)) requires local jurisdictions to incorporate environmental justice in their general plans by developing policies to reduce the disproportionate exposure to pollution in neighborhoods that also experience increased social and economic challenges. These requirements are organized into two subsections: Section 65302 (h)(1) through Section 65302 (h)(2), which are summarized below:
• 65302 (h)(1) adds to the required elements of the general plan an environmental justice element, or related goals, policies, and objectives integrated in other elements, that identifies “disadvantaged communities.”
• 65302 (h)(1)(A) identifies objectives and policies to promote:
• Public facilities in disadvantaged communities;
• Food access in disadvantaged communities;
• Safe and sanitary homes in disadvantaged communities; • Physical activity in disadvantaged communities;
• Exposure to pollution, including improving air quality in disadvantaged communities; and • Any unique or compounded health risks in disadvantaged communities. • 65302 (h)(1)(B) identifies objectives and policies to promote civic engagement in the public decision-making process in disadvantaged communities.
• 65302 (h)(1)(C) identifies objectives and policies that prioritize improvements and programs that address the needs of disadvantaged communities.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 11
• 65302 (h)(2) requires the adoption or revision of environmental justice element, or related goals, policies, and objectives, upon the revision of two or more elements concurrently on or after January 1, 2018
California law refers to communities with high levels of environmental and socioeconomic vulnerability as “disadvantaged communities.” Identifying communities faced with social, economic, and environmental challenges as “disadvantaged” does not accurately capture the many strengths these communities also possess, such as a strong sense of community and local community -based organizations and residents working to improve their neighborhood. With this in mind, for the purposes of this Element, any area which qualifies as a “disadvantaged community” under State law will be referred to as a “Community of Focus.” “Disadvantaged Communities” are defined by California State Law as (1) “an area identified by the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) pursuant to Section 39711 of the Health and Safety code;” or (2) “a low-income area that is disproportiona tely affected by environmental pollution and other hazards that can lead to negative health effects, exposure, or environmental degradation” pursuant to California Government Code Section 650302(h)(4)(A).

9.2.2 Identifying Environmental Justice Communities
This section explains the methodology used by the City to identify the Community of Focus for analysis.

Methodology and Analysis
The City used two geospatial screening tools that analyze socioeconomic, environmental, and health factors to identify if a Community of Focus exists within the city limits.

CalEnviroScreen 4.0
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 is a screening tool developed by the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and is the primary screening tool used by the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) to identify disadvantaged communi ties in California. CalEnviroScreen uses 21 indicators to assess pollution burdens and population vulnerabilities for each census tract in California and assigns a score for each indicator. The higher the score, the more that census tract is impacted by th at indicator. Individual indicator scores are then summarized into two primary metrics: pollution burden and population characteristics, which are together calculated to determine an overall CalEnviroScreen score. Census tracts in the top 25 percent of ove rall CalEnviroScreen scores (percentile scores between 75 and 100) are identified as disadvantaged communities by the CalEPA. Figure 9-1: shows overall CalEnviroScreen 4.0 scores in Hanford.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

12 City of Hanford
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Cumulative Scores
The Pollution Burden score identifies census tracts that are disproportionately affected by pollution exposure and other adverse environmental conditions that pose negative health effects and environmental degradation.

The Population Characteristics score identifies census tracts with higher concentrations of people with physiological traits, health status, or community characteristics that can result in increased vulnerability to pollution.

The overall CalEnviroScreen score is a cumulative score that combines the Pollution Burden and Population Characteristics scores and represents the cumulative impact of environmental and socioeconomic effects on a community.

CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Data Dashboard

CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Results Map
EJScreen
EJScreen was a screening tool developed by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) that combined environmental and socioeconomic factors to calculate environmental justice index scores for each census block group in the United States. EJScreen provide d an environmental justice index score for 12 environmental indicators that then receive d a percentile score compared to both countrywide and statewide scores. For the purposes of this Environmental Justice Element, Hanford block groups were compared to statewide percentile scores and a 75th percentile filter was used as the threshold for identifying the Community of Focus.

On February 5 th, 2025, the EPA removed EJScreen from its website, including the mapping tool and all associated data products. The EJScreen data used in this Environmental Justice Element were downloaded prior to the removal of EJScreen from the EPA’s website.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 13
SB 535 Communities
In 2012, Senate Bill (SB) 535 tasked the CalEPA with identifying disadvantaged communities. Disadvantaged communities in California are targeted for investments from State funding to improve public health, quality of life, and economic opportunity. In 2022 , the CalEPA updated its designation of disadvantaged communities based on the following four criteria:

1. Census tracts receiving the highest 25 percent of overall scores in CalEnviroScreen 4.0

2. Census tracts lacking overall scores in CalEnviroScreen 4.0 due to data gaps, but receiving the highest five percent of CalEnviroScreen 4.0 cumulative pollution burden scores

3. Census tracts identified in the 2017 Disadvantaged Community designation as “disadvantaged,” regardless of their scores in CalEnviroScreen 4.0

4. Lands under the control of federally recognized Tribes Figure 9-2: shows census tracts in Hanford identified as disadvantaged communities under the 2022 SB 535 designation criteria by the CalEPA.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

14 City of Hanford
Figure 9-1: CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Cumulative Scores, Hanford

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 15
Figure 9-2: SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities, Hanford

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

16 City of Hanford
Hanford’s Community of Focus
Based on the established methodology, the Hanford Community of Focus encompasses approximately eight square miles on the southern portion of Hanford, along and south of State Route 198 . As shown in Figure 9-3, the Community of Focus includes the following census tracts:
• Tract 8 (603 100 0800)
• Tract 9.01 (603 100 0901)
• Tract 9.02 (603 100 0902)
• Tract 10.02 (603 100 1002)
• Tract 10.03 (603 100 1003)
• Tract 11 (603 100 1100)
• Tract 12 (603 100 1200)
Census tracts 1 (603 100 0100) and 12 (603 100 1200), both SB 535 designated disadvantage communities, are located in the northern and southern portions of the City of Hanford, respectively.

A very small portion of census tract 1 (about 149 acres) is located in the incorporated Hanford city limits and contains a couple residences and orchards. Most of the remainder of this census tract is in unincorporated Kings County. Given that so little of this census tract is located within city limits, this census tract has been excluded from this analysis.

Additionally, a portion of census tract 12 (about 1,413 acres) is located in the incorporated Hanford city limits and contains important services for the city, including the Hanford Fire Station 2 and Hanford wastewater treatment plant, as well as a variety of light and heavy industrial uses. The remainder of the census tract is in unincorporated Kings County. Based on a study of aerial imagery maps of this census tract, there are four to five residences located within the portion of census tract 12 that is within the Hanford city limits, and around 30 residences in a small subdivision just outside of the Hanford city limits along Iona Avenue and Houston Avenue. Although a majority of census tract 12 is outside of the city limits (96,913 acres), the City has opted to still include the census tract in its Community of Focus recognizing that the activities occurring in heavy industrial areas within the city impact the environmental health of surrounding residential properties and contribute significantly to the overall pollution and population burden scores of the census tract.

It should be noted that certain metrics analyzed in this Element indicate citywide environmental justice issues that are not exclusive to the Community of Focus. For these metrics, data points for all census tracts in the city have been included in the ana lysis to demonstrate disproportionate exposure or impacts that impact all residents.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 17
Figure 9-3: Hanford’s Community of Focus

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

18 City of Hanford

9.3 Public Participation
Starting in June 2025, the City facilitated a series of community engagement events to gather community input on environmental justice issues. This section provides an overview of the engagement strategy for this effort and a summary of feedback received.

The feedback received throughout the public participation process was used to develop the goals, policies, and programs included in this Element.

9.3.1 Publicity and Outreach Strategy
The City used a variety of methods to publicize engagement events and activities to reach a broad range of Hanford residents. Below is a summary of the City’s publicity strategy. See Appendix B for copies of publicity materials used throughout the public participation process.

Project Webpage
A dedicated project webpage on the City’s
website was created and updated with
information about the project and engagement
opportunities. Community outreach events were
posted one to two weeks before each event with
the information, time, and location of the event.

The environmental justice community survey was
also posted on the project website from June 5,
2025, through November 3, 2025.

Community Based Organization (CBO)
Outreach
The City coordinated with two local CBOs, Kings Community Action Organization (KCAO) and Kings Partnership (KPFP), that work with environmental justice communities in Hanford. CBOs are valuable partners in the engagement process since they have established relationships and trust among community members and have insight into existing health and equity issues within the local community. The City coordinated with these CBOs to host meetings and distribute information about the Environmental Justice Element and ways for community members to provide feedback and get involved.

Social Media
The City posted notifications of the environmental justice survey and outreach events on the City’s social media pages that included event information, the survey link, and a link to the project webpage. Between June and November 2025, the Project Team made 15 social media posts across Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Nextdoor, and Twitter (X).

9.3.2 Community Outreach Events
Between June 2025 and October 2025, the City facilitated a variety of in-person community outreach events.

All events featured similar content and activities to ensure consistency across responses received. See Appendix B for all materials used at these events.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 19
Night Market Pop-Up Booths | June 5 and June 26, 2025
The city facilitated two “pop -up” booths at the Hanford Thursday Night Market on June 5 and June 26, 2025. The
purpose of these events was to provide community members with an understanding of environmental justice topics, identify issues within the community, and suggest preliminary ideas for potential improvements. In attendance were two City staff members and two members of the consultant team. The booth consisted of informational posters with an overview of
environmental justice. All booth materials and acti vities were available in both English and Spanish.

Monday Swap Meet/Flea Market | September 15, 2025
The Project Team attended the Hanford Swap Meet and Flea Market on September 15, 2025. The event draws a large and diverse crowd, providing an opportunity to meet residents where they are and engage the community in an informal
setting. Throughout the even t, Project Team members
walked the market and initiated conversations with attendees.

A Spanish -speaking member of City staff was present to engage attendees who preferred to communicate in Spanish.

All outreach materials distributed at the event were available in both English and Spanish.

During conversations with attendees, the team distributed hard copies of the Environmental Justice Survey and assisted interested participants in completing it on -site. They also handed out cards containing a link and QR code to the online version of the survey, along with additional project information.

Kings Community Action Organization Workshop |
September 24, 2025
The City facilitated a community workshop at the KCAO on September 24, 2025. The workshop was structured to include a presentation providing an overview of environmental justice followed by small break -out group discussions with a Project Team facilitator guiding participants through an interactive exercise designed to spark conversation.

Despite advertisement of the workshop through social media, the City website, press releases, and publicity with local CBOs, no community members attended the meeting. Following the meeting, the Project Team debriefed on how to best approach to community o utreach, resulting in the decision to hold

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

20 City of Hanford
additional pop-up booths at local events and facilitate presentations at existing community group meetings described below.

Hanford Night Out Booth | October 7, 2025
The City facilitated a “pop-up” booth at the Hanford Night Out event on Tuesday, October 7, 2025, hosted by the Hanford Police Department. The booth consisted of informational posters with an overview of environmental justice and an interactive dot exercise.

In the exercise, participants were asked to prioritize the “Traits of a Healthy Community” by placing sticky dots on a large poster. Each participant received three dots and was instructed to place them on the traits they feel are most important for creating a healthy and thriving community. The three dots can be placed on one trait or spread across multiple traits, depending on personal priorities, allowing participants to expre ss both strong individual preferences and a range of values. All booth materials and activities were available in both English and Spanish.

KPFP Community Meeting Presentation | October 16, 2025
On October 16, 2025, the city attended the Kings Partnership for Prevention regular monthly meeting to provide a presentation about environmental justice and the Environmental Justice Element project and asked attendees to provide feedback and input.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 21

9.3.3 Community Survey
The environmental justice community survey was
available online from June 5, 2025, through November
3, 2025, in both English and Spanish. The survey was
created using the Maptionnaire survey platform, which
allowed for interactive mapping questions within a
traditional online survey. The survey was divided into
six sections covering the six environmental justice topic areas (pollution exposure, public facilities, food access, safe and sanitary housing, physical activity, and civic engagement) with the goal of understanding lived
experiences of community members related to each topic
area. Each section had two to five questions that were either multiple choice or interactive mapping questions with a total of 18 questions and was available in both English and
Spanish.

A total of 42 survey responses with meaningful data were gathered throughout the outreach process, including physical survey responses received at outreach events. Although the survey was optimized for online participation, printed versions of the survey were available at in -person community outreach events and included the same questions in the online survey.

Survey responses are used in this Element to supplement the analysis of environmental justice issues in the Hanford Community of Focus. Participants were asked to identify where they lived in Hanford by selecting one of 13 census tracts within the city and indicate if they live and/or work in Hanford. This information allowed the Project Team to better understand where in Hanford responden ts live while also maintaining anonymity of individual respondents. The survey results were grouped and analyzed based on location within or outside of the Community of Focus identified in Section 9.1.6. About 36 percent of respondents live in the Community of Focus.

9.4 Community Profile and Demographics
Residents in the Community of Focus represent diverse cultures, incomes, and ages. This section summarizes the population and socioeconomic factors for each of the census tracts in the Community of Focus.

Table 9-2: Total Population

Census Tracts in the Community of Focus
Hanford,
CA
Kings
County 8 9.01 9.02 10.02 10.03 11 12*
Total
Population
5,038 3,904 3,253 4,024 7,144 6,818 2,371 59,389 152,83 0 *Note: This data reflects that of the full census tract 12, which extends significantly beyond the Hanford city limits.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (S1701), 2023.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

22 City of Hanford

9.4.1 Race and Ethnicity
Analyzing the racial and ethnic makeup of communities helps to identify potential disparities related to pollution burdens, health impacts, and quality of community services. Race and ethnicity factors are often tied to a community’s overall health equity and the social determinants of health, along with income, educational attainment, employment status, and access to healthcare.

As shown in Table 9-3, the largest racial or ethnic group in the Community of Focus is Hispanic or Latino.

This is generally much higher than the city of Hanford and Kings County, although census tract 9.02 has a similar proportion of residents which identify as Hispanic or Latino compared to the city and county. Just over 77 percent of the population living in census tract 11 identify as Hispanic or Latino. Census tract 10.02 has the second highest Hispanic or Latino population ( 72 percent), followed by census tract 8 (71 percent). In most census tracts in the Community of Focus, the second largest racial or ethnic group was “white alone ,” ranging from 44 to 54 percent of residents; however, in census tract 11, the second largest groups were “some other race alone” and “white alone” at 32 and 31 percent of the population, respectively. Comparatively, the largest racial or ethnic group in city of Hanford was “white alone” followed by “Hispanic or Latino,” while the largest groups in Kings County were “Hispanic or Latino” followed by “white alone.”

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 23
Table 9-3: Race and Ethnicity
Race/
Ethnicity
Census Tracts in the Community of Focus Census Tracts Outside of the Community of Focus Hanford,
CA
Kings
County 8 9.01 9.02 10.02 10.03 11 12* 6.02 6.03 6.04 7.01 7.02 10.01 White alone 42.1% 54.3% 54.1% 46.5% 43.9% 30.8% 62.9% 69.0% 53.9% 59.4% 65.9% 62.0% 54.3% 54.1% 46.0% Black or
African
American
alone

1.3% 1.8% 12.3% 3.2% 5.9% 11.6% 1.9% 14.1% 7.7% 3.8% 3.6% 0.0% 4.5% 5.9% 6.4% American
Indian and
Alaska Native
alone

1.3% 4.0% 3.1% 5.9% 0.9% 1.8% 1.9% 0.4% 1.9% 0.4% 0.9% 1.7% 1.1% 1.7% 1.9% Asian alone 1.4% 0.6% 0.3% 0.9% 2.7% 0.6% 0.0% 0.7% 10.4% 5.1% 3.5% 2.5% 11.9% 3.5% 3.5% Native
Hawaiian and
Other Pacific
Islander
alone

0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.3% Some other
race alone

19.8% 25.0% 19.9% 19.2% 23.0% 32.0% 12.7% 5.4% 12.0% 8.3% 12.4% 22.7% 10.7% 17.0% 21.6% Two or more
races

34.2% 14.2% 9.4% 24.4% 23.2% 23.2% 20.6% 10.4% 14.1% 23.1% 13.7% 11.1% 17.5% 17.6% 20.3% Hispanic or
Latino

70.1% 67.3% 55.6% 71.5% 68.7% 77.3% 45.8% 28.6% 37.1% 39.8% 34.8% 45.1% 37.2% 51.3% 57.5% Total
Population
5,038 3,904 3,253 4,024 7,144 6,818 2,371 6,216 3,513 7,671 5,876 4,648 5,484 59,389 152,83 0 *Note: This data reflects that of the full census tract 12, which extends significantly beyond the Hanford city limits.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (B03002), 2023.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

24 City of Hanford

9.4.2 Household Income and Poverty Status
Low-income areas are often disproportionately impacted by environmental hazards (i.e., air and water pollution) as household income determines one’s living conditions, including housing, nutrition, occupation, and access to healthcare. Additionally, low -income communities are often located in areas with high levels of pollution from adjacent land uses, which can result in environmental injustices and disproportionate impacts on residents.

As shown in Table 9-4, the median annual income in the Community of Focus ranges from $33,750 to $83,167.

Although most tracts in the Community of Focus have lower median annual incomes that are lower than citywide ($73,744) and countywide (68,750), census tract 10.03 is an outlier with a median annual income of $83,167. Similarly, all census tracts in the Community of Focus have much higher poverty rates compared to the city and county, apart from census tract 10.03, which has a lower poverty rate than the city and county.

Table 9-4: Household Income and Poverty Status in the Community of Focus

Census Tracts in the Community of Focus
Hanford,
CA
Kings
County 8 9.01 9.02 10.02 10.03 11 12*
Median
Income
$67,009 $37,500 $53,319 $33,750 $83,167 $38,903 $74,970 $73,544 $68,750 Average
Income
(Mean)
$86,857 $48,803 $57,807 $53,121 $89,821 $49,828 $95,196 $90,490 $86,268 Population
in Poverty

26.9% 29.1% 20.0% 41.1% 11.8% 30.7% 8.5% 14.9% 16.8%
Total
Population
5,038 3,904 3,253 4,024 7,144 6,818 2,371 59,389 152,830 *Note: This data reflects that of the full census tract 12, which extends significantly beyond the Hanford city limits.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (S1701, S1901), 2023.

9.4.3 Unemployment
The unemployment rate of residents directly influences the mental, physical, and financial health of those unemployed, their families, and the community at large. Gaps in employment can significantly reduce the amount of disposal income available to indivi duals and their families, which can impact the ability to pay for essential items such as housing, food, and other living expenses. This decreased spending caused by a temporary or long-term reduction in disposable income can have a direct impact on the to tal amount of money spent locally, which in turn can negatively impact the local economy of the region. Additionally, the many stressors associated with being unemployed can cause a number of physical health problems, including high blood pressure, diabetes, and heart disease, as well as mental health problems, such as anxiety and depression.

As shown in Table 9-5, the Community of Focus has varying levels of unemployment that are generally higher than the city and county. Census tract 9.01 has the highest unemployment rate ( 22 percent), which is significantly higher than the city of Hanford (nine percent) and Kings County (nine percent). All other census tracts in the Community of Focus have an unemployment rate ranging from nine to 13 percent, apart from census tract 9.02, which has an unusually low unemployment rate of two percent.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 25
Table 9-5: Unemployment

Census Tracts in the Community of Focus
Hanford,
CA
Kings
County 8 9.01 9.02 10.02 10.03 11 12*
Unemployment
Rate

10.5% 21.8% 2.8% 10.3% 9.3% 13.4% 10.2% 8.6% 8.9%
Total Population 5,038 3,904 3,253 4,024 7,144 6,818 2,371 59,389 152,830 *Note: This data reflects that of the full census tract 12, which extends significantly beyond the Hanford city limits.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (S2301), 2023.

9.4.4 Educational Attainment
Educational attainment can influence several socioeconomic factors that can impact health outcomes. People with a higher level of educational attainment tend to have better access to higher paying jobs, gain knowledge to make healthy choices, and build important social and cognitive skills that can help increase civic engagement and participation in the public-decision making process.

As shown in Table 9 -6, the Community of Focus has slightly lower or comparable levels of educational attainment compared to the city and county in regard to residents who hold a high school degree or higher .

Census tract 11 has the lowest level of educational attainment, with approximately 61 percent of its residents holding a high school degree or higher and approximately four percent of its residents holding a bachelor's degree or higher. Census tract 10.03 has the highest number of college graduates out of all census trats in the Community of Focus (eight percent), although this is still lower than in the city and county. Other census tracts in the Community of Focus have a university attainment level between four to seven percent. Census tract 8 also has the highest number of high school graduates ( 84 percent), which is somewhat higher than in the city (82 percent) and much higher than the county (76 percent). All other census tracts within the Community of Focus have a high school attainment level of 61 percent to 76 percent, which is generally lower than that of the city and county.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

26 City of Hanford
Table 9-6: Educational Attainment
Educational
Attainment
Census Tracts in the Community of Focus Census Tracts Outside of the Community of Focus Hanford,
CA
Kings
County 8 9.01 9.02 10.02 10.03 11 12* 6.02 6.03 6.04 7.01 7.02 10.01 High School
or Higher

84.1% 75.5% 69.5% 68.7% 77.4% 60.8% 87.3% 97.7% 90.3% 89.1% 89.4% 84.1% 85.2% 81.9% 76.0% Bachelor's or
Higher

3.5% 6.7% 3.6% 3.7% 7.7% 4.0% 16.7% 28.7% 38.1% 27.2% 17.9% 10.9% 25.0% 16.0% 12.6% Total
Population
Aged 18 and
over
3,664 2,858 2,334 2,853 5,160 4,521 1,698 4,303 2,366 5,043 4,576 3,518 4,164 42,360 111,45 6 Total
Population
5,038 3,904 3,253 4,024 7,144 6,818 2,371 6,216 3,513 7,671 5,876 4,648 5,484 59,389 152,83 0 *Note: This data reflects that of the full census tract 12, which extends significantly beyond the Hanford city limits.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (S1501), 2023.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 27

9.4.5 Language Spoken and English Proficiency
Over 40 percent of Californians speak a language other than English at home, half of which do not speak English well or at all. Individuals who do not speak English well or at all are often at a disadvantage when it comes to receiving important information about social services, healthcare, and emergency notifications.

Limited English proficiency can also make it difficult for individuals to participate in traditional public decision- making processes (i.e., City Council or other public meetings) if translat ion services and materials are not provided for meetings. In the Community of Focus, English and Spanish are the primary languages spoken at home, similar to the city and county.

As shown in Table 9-7, all census tracts in the Community of Focus, except for 9.01, have a much higher percentage of Spanish -speaking households than the city. There is a much higher rate of Spanish -speaking households in c ensus tract s 11 and 10.02 (57 percent) than in the city and county (29 and 38 percent, respectively). Other languages spoken in the Community of Focus fall into two categories: “other Indo - European languages” and “Asian and Pacific Island languages;” however, households speak these languages at home at comparable rates to the city and county.

Table 9-7: Language Spoken at Home
Language
Spoken
Census Tracts in the Community of Focus
Hanford,
CA
Kings
County 8 9.01 9.02 10.02 10.03 11 12*
English Only 48.4% 73.9% 69.7% 41.3% 46.1% 42.1% 63.0% 66.0% 57.9% Spanish 47.3% 23.9% 29.0% 56.7% 49.8% 57.2% 32.5% 29.2% 37.7% Other Indo-
European
Languages

2.9% 2.0% 0.1% 1.0% 1.5% 0.4% 4.5% 1.8% 1.5%
Asian and
Pacific Island
Languages

1.5% 0.2% 1.2% 1.0% 2.6% 0.4% 0.0% 2.6% 2.5%
Other
Languages

0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.4%
Population 5
Years and
Over
4,890 3,634 2,984 3,676 6,584 6,275 2,225 55,059 141,762 Total
Population
5,038 3,904 3,253 4,024 7,144 6,818 2,371 59,389 152,830 *Note: This data reflects that of the full census tract 12, which extends significantly beyond the Hanford city limits.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (S1601), 2023.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

28 City of Hanford

9.4.6 Age
Children and older populations are more vulnerable to the negative health impacts from environmental hazards such as air pollution and extreme heat. Children may also be more likely to spend time outdoors or at playgrounds, which can expose this age group to environmental hazards such as lead in soil or pesticide residue on grass. Considering age distribution in environmental justice efforts ensures the needs and concerns of different age groups are considered, resulting in more equitable and sustainable communities for all residents.

As shown in Table 9-8, the distribution of residents of different age groups varies by census tract. Although census tracts 8, 10.02, and 10.03 have comparable proportions of residents under 15 years old compared to the city and county, census tracts 11, 9.01, and 9.02 have a higher proportion of younger residents than the city and county. There is greater variation in the number of residents between the ages of 15 and 64 between the census tracts in the Community of Focus and the city and county , ranging from 57 to 71 percent of residents in the Community of Focus compared to 63 and 67 percent of residents in the city and county, respectively. Generally, census tracts in the Community of Focus ha ve fewer residents aged 65 and above than other census tracts in the city. However, notable outliers include census tracts 8 and 9.01, both of which have a higher proportion of senior residents than the city and county.

Table 9-8: Age
Age Group
Census Tracts in the Community of Focus
Hanford,
CA
Kings
County 8 9.01 9.02 10.02 10.03 11 12*
Children (<15) 21.0% 25.7% 26.5% 22.7% 21.0% 29.1% 20.8% 23.8% 22.7% General
Population (15-64)

63.6% 56.8% 64.4% 66.9% 71.3% 61.2% 67.4% 63.4% 66.7%
Older Population
(65+)

15.3% 17.6% 9.1% 10.4% 7.7% 9.7% 11.9% 12.8% 10.6%
Total Population 5,038 3,904 3,253 4,024 7,144 6,818 2,371 59,389 152,830 *Note: This data reflects that of the full census tract 12, which extends significantly beyond the Hanford city limits.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (DP05), 2023.

9.5 Environmental Justice Concerns

9.5.1 Community Health
The risk and severity of chronic health problems such as asthma, obesity, heart disease, and diabetes can be a direct or indirect result of someone’s environment. Residents of environmental justice communities tend to have higher rates of these chronic hea lth problems due to increased pollution exposure (at work and/or at home), lack of access to spaces where residents can be active, lack of access to healthy foods, unhealthy living conditions, or a combination of these factors. Lack of investment and incompatible land uses in residential areas can result in someone’s overall health being partially determined by their zip code. This section describes the presence of chronic health problems in Hanford.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 29
Asthma
Asthma is a chronic lung disease that causes individuals to have episodes of breathlessness, coughing, and chest tightness. Exposure to high levels of air pollutants such as traffic, particulate matter, smog, and diesel exhaust can trigger asthma attacks. People who live, work, or recreate near major roads, highways, and railways are at higher risk of frequent asthmatic episodes and more serious health complications from asthma.

Table 9 -9 shows the number of children and adults diagnosed with asthma in the Community of Focus compared to the city and county . Within the community of focus, census tract 10.03 has the highest rate of children who have been diagnosed with asthma (20 percent), while census tract 11 has the highest rate of adults who have ever been diagnosed with asthma (22 percent). However, it should be noted that all census tracts in the city, both within and outside of the community of focus, generally have similar rates of asthma diagnoses , with the exception of census tract 10.02, which has much lower rates of asthma diagnoses compared to the city and county.

CalEnviroScreen 4.0 measures the Asthma Indicator by estimating the average number of asthma related ER visits per 10,000 people, measuring the most severe asthma attacks. As shown in Figure 9-4, almost the entirety of the city of Hanford is over the 95 th percentile for asthma, both within and outside of the Community of Focus. This equates to approximately 108 to 120 people per 10,000 residents in each census tract who visited the local emergency room for asthma between 2015 and 2017.

Table 9-9: Rate of Asthma

Census Tracts in the Community of Focus
Hanford,
CA
Kings
County 8 9.01 9.02 10.02 10.03 11 12*
Children (0-
17) ever
diagnosed
with asthma

17.5% 15.6% 14.5% 10.3% 20.2% 14.8% Data not
available

16.6% 16.5%
Adults (18+)
ever
diagnosed
with asthma

16.6% 19.7% 19.5% 11.6% 15.6% 22.0% 19.1% 18.3% 18.6%
*Note: This data reflects that of the full census tract 12, which extends significantly beyond the Hanford city limits.

Source: California Health Interview Survey (CHIS), 2022.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

30 City of Hanford
Figure 9-4: CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Asthma-Related ER Visits

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 31
Obesity
Obesity is a health condition that is present when a person’s body mass index (BMI) is equal to 30 or more.

Individuals who are obese are at higher risk of serious health problems, including heart disease, diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, a nd liver disease. Obesity rates in a community are impacted by physical activity level as well as available food options. Several factors can contribute to higher obesity rates in environmental justice communities. Inequitable development patterns and poli cies in environmental justice communities often leads to a higher prevalence of unhealthy food options in these areas, such as fast food and liquor stores. These communities also tend to receive less investment in neighborhood infrastructure that promotes physical activity, such as sidewalks, trees, and bike lanes. Additionally, research shows that low - income households may lack the money, education, or tools to purchase and prepare healthy foods and often cope with food insecurity by consuming nutrient -poor but calorie-rich foods that can increase risk of obesity and/or malnutrition.

As shown in Table 9-10, adult obesity rates in the Community of Focus tend to be comparable or slightly higher than citywide and countywide rates. Census tract 10.02 has the highest rate of obesity at 48 percent of adults, compared to 42 percent of adults in both the city and county. Census tracts 8, 9.01, 9.02, and 10.03 all have comparable rates of obesity compared to the citywide rate. However, the obesity rate across the Community of Focus, city, and county are 11 to 19 percent higher than the statewide obesity rate (2 9 percent). This data suggests that Hanford residents, particularly those that live in the Community of Focus, may face greater challenges with access to healthy food options and opportunities for physical activity than in other parts of the state.

Table 9-10: Rate of Obesity

Census Tracts in the Community of Focus
Hanford,
CA
Kings
County 8 9.01 9.02 10.02 10.03 11 12*
Adults (18+)
with a BMI
of 30+

42.4% 42.4% 43.6% 47.7% 43.4% 39.8% 41.4% 42.4% 41.5%
*Note: This data reflects that of the full census tract 12, which extends significantly beyond the Hanford city limits.

Source: California Health Interview Survey (CHIS), 2022.

Diabetes
Diabetes is a chronic health condition that occurs when the body does not produce enough insulin or when the body cannot use its insulin effectively. Over time, the symptoms of diabetes can cause serious health problems, including heart disease, vision loss, and kidney disease. There are two types of diabetes ; type 1 diabetes is not thought to be caused by environmental or lifestyle choices, whereas type 2 diabetes can be prevented through regular physical activity and healthy food choices. Regardless of the type, management of diabetes requires healthy lifestyle choices including healthy food choices, regular physical activity, controlling blood pressure, and controlling cholesterol, all of which can be more challenging for environmental justice communities.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

32 City of Hanford
The rate of diabetes in the Community of Focus are comparable or slightly higher than those of the city and county. Census tracts 10.02 and 10.03 both have the highest rates of diabetes in the city at 13 percent, compared to 11 percent in both the city and county. All remaining census tracts in the Community of Focus have comparable rates of diabetes to the city and county. Although neighborhoods that reflect higher rates of diabetes may not be due to environmental conditions, it demonstrates the importance of providing an environment that promotes healthy lifestyle choices in these neighborhoods such as adequate sidewalks, parks, and recreational opportunities, as well as access to healthcare and healthy food.

Table 9-11: Rate of Diabetes

Census Tracts in the Community of Focus
Hanford,
CA
Kings
County 8 9.01 9.02 10.02 10.03 11 12*
Adults (18+)
ever diagnosed
with diabetes

11.9% 10.4% 10.7% 12.8% 12.7% 10.3% 9.3% 11.2% 10.5%
*Note: This data reflects that of the full census tract 12, which extends significantly beyond the Hanford city limits.

Source: California Health Interview Survey (CHIS), 2022.

Heart Disease
Heart disease encompasses various heart conditions and is the leading cause of death in the United States. The most common type of heart disease in the U.S. is coronary artery disease, which can cause heart attacks in individuals. Risk factors for heart disease include high blood pressure and blood cholesterol, diabetes, and obesity. Heart disease can be prevented through regular physical activity and a healthy diet, both of which tend to be less easily attainable in environmental justice communities due to a lack of neighborhood infrastructure that promotes physical activity (i.e. parks, sidewalks, proximity to high traffic roads) and lack of healthy food choices due to income, access to full -service grocery stores, or time or knowledge to prepare healthy f oods at home.

As shown in Table 9-12:, the rate of adults diagnosed with heart disease in the Community of Focus are similar (within one to two percent) to the citywide and countywide heart disease rates. These heart disease rates are all also comparable to the statewide rate of around seven percent.

CalEnviroScreen 4.0 measures the Cardiovascular Disease Indicator by estimating the number of people per 10,000 who visited the ER for a heart attack. All census tracts in Hanford, both within and outside of the Community of Focus, have Cardiovascular Disease Indicator percentile scores between 98 and 99, meaning the rate of heart attack related ER visits is significantly higher when compared to other census tracts in California.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 33
Table 9-12: Rate of Heart Disease

Census Tracts in the Community of Focus
Hanford,
CA
Kings
County 8 9.01 9.02 10.02 10.03 11 12*
Adults (18+) ever
diagnosed with
heart disease

7.2% 7.8% 6.4% 5.9% 6.1% 8.4% 8.5% 7.4% 6.7%
*Note: This data reflects that of the full census tract 12, which extends significantly beyond the Hanford city limits.

Source: California Health Interview Survey (CHIS), 2022.

9.5.2 Pollution Exposure
Pollution exposure occurs when people come into direct contact with pollutants in the air, water, food, or soil.

Pollution can be the result of polluting land uses (e.g., industrial facilities, agriculture), heavy or high traffic transportation facilities (e.g., railroads, freeways), or household conditions (e.g ., lead paint, indoor air quality).

Environmental justice communities, especially low -income communities, are more likely to live or work near one or more polluting sources due to underinvestment and land use decisions that concentrated polluting land uses near low -income communities. Living or working near polluting land uses can result in a higher risk of serious health issues such as respiratory infections, cancer, or heart disease due to consistent pollution exposure.

This section discusses the major pollution burdens in Hanford based on data from CalEnviroScreen 4.0 and EJScreen.

Diesel Particulate Matter
Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) is a type of air pollution that derives from diesel engine emissions. Major sources of DPM include on- and off- road mobile sources such as trucks, buses, cars, ships, trains, and heavy machinery (e.g., tractors). For this reason, DPM is concentrated near ports, rail yards, and freeways where there are high traffic volumes.

DPM is made up of extremely small particles of dirt and soot that come out of the exhaust pipes of vehicles.

With consistent exposure, these particles are easily inhaled and cause irritation to the eyes, trouble breathing, heart disease, and lung cancer. Children, the elderly, and people with existing respiratory diseases such as asthma are more vulnerable to the negative health effects of DPM.

Hanford is bisected by California State Route 198 (SR 198), a four -lane highway for passenger vehicles and trucks, as well as a railway that is located just north of SR 198. Both SR 198 and the railway are sources of DPM that impact Hanford residents. Figure 9-5 shows concentrations of DPM emitted into the air within and census tracts in the city as reported in CalEnviroScreen 4.0. Census tracts in the Hanford Community of Focus have a higher concentration of DPM emissions compared to other areas of the cit y. Similarly, in the community survey, respondents in the Community of Focus reported air pollution from cars and trucks as a source of pollution experienced in their neighborhood at a higher rate (60 percent of respondents) compared to respondents outside of the Community of Focus (26 percent).

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

34 City of Hanford
Figure 9-5: CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Diesel Particulate Matter

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 35
Ozone
Ozone is a gas formed when oxygen -containing compounds react with other air pollutants (e.g., carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide) in the presence of sunlight and can be either good or bad depending on where it is found. Ozone found in the ea rth’s upper atmosphere provides protection from the sun’s ultraviolet (UV) rays at the earth’s surface. In contrast, ozone found at the ground level is the primary component of smog and can cause adverse health impacts such as respiratory irritation, lung disease, asthma, and cancer. Common air pollut ers that create ozone at the ground level include cars, trucks, power plants, chemical plants, and farms.

To monitor ozone levels across California, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) maintains a network of air monitoring stations, one of which is in Hanford on South Irwin Street . Ozone levels are typically their highest in the afternoons and summer months when the days are longer and hotter, therefore, the CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Ozone Indicator score is determined based on the daily maximum ozone concentration in summer months (May – October).

As shown in Figure 9-6, all census tracts in Hanford have an Ozone Indicator percentile score of 82, meaning the ozone concentrations in Hanford is 82 percent higher than all other census tracts in California. This demonstrates that ozone pollution exposure affects not only Hanford’s Community of Focus, but also the citywide population.

Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5)
PM2.5 is a form of air pollution that that is made up of very small particles (less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter) and can include a variety of particles, including organic chemicals, dust, soot, and metals. Particulate matter can come from any activiti es involving combustion, such as transportation, agriculture, industry, and construction.

The small size of PM2.5 particles can cause serious health effects on the heart and lungs, as these fine particles can more easily penetrate into the lungs and even into the bloodstream. Exposure to PM2.5 can result in lung irritation, exacerbation of asthma and other respiratory diseases, lung disease, heart disease, and increased risk of strokes.

PM2.5 levels are monitored by CARB’s air monitoring stations, which is used by CalEnviroScreen 4.0 to measure the PM2.5 Indicator percentile scores based on annual average concentrations of PM2.5. Similar to the Ozone Indicator percentile score, the PM2.5 Indicator percentile scores for all census tracts in Hanford are between 98 and 99 (see Figure 9-7), meaning the PM2.5 concentrations in Hanford are 98 to 99 percent higher than all other census tracts in California.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

36 City of Hanford
Figure 9-6: CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Ozone Concentration

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 37
Figure 9-7: CalEnviroScreen 4.0 PM2.5 Concentration

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

38 City of Hanford
Pesticide Use
Pesticides are chemicals used to control insects, plant diseases, and other pests that threaten crops. Pesticides applied in agricultural areas can become airborne , drift to neighboring communities, and become a significant source of pollution exposure to residents. Chronic exposure to harmful pesticides can cause serious health issues such as respiratory illnesses, birth defects, cancer, and neurological impacts.

Although over 1,000 pesticides are registered for use in California, CalEnviroScreen 4.0’s pesticide use indicator assesses 132 of the most toxic and volatile active pesticide ingredients residents may be exposed to. The indicator adds the total pounds per square mile of these selected pesticide ingredients for the years 2017 to 2019 for each census tract. Selected pesticides with highest use in and around Hanford assessed as part of the CalEnviroScreen 4.0 indicator include:
• 1,3-dichloropropene. Typically used in soil that can cause short -term and long-term health impacts to humans if exposed, such as nose and throat irritation, chest pain, difficulty breathing, skin sensitivity, and chronic respiratory issues.
• Dimethoate. A widely used organophosphate insecticide and acaricide that can cause cancer, endocrine disruption, and reproductive toxicity, even with low levels of exposure. • 2,4-d, dimethylamine salt. An herbicide that kills broadleaf weeds that can cause eye irritation and is possibly carcinogenic in humans.
• Buprofezin. An insecticide used for control of insect pests that is toxic to aquatic organisms and may cause damage to liver and kidneys in humans.
• Flumioxazin. A herbicide that is applied by spraying and can cause eye and skin irritation • Chlorothalonil. An organic compound used primarily as a fungicide and mildewicide, as well as a bactericide, microbiocide, algaecide, insecticide, and acaricide. It can irritate the nose, throat and lungs causing cough, phlegm and/or tightness in the chest. • Paraquat dichloride. A widely used herbicide that is highly fatal to humans when ingested and is corrosive to the skin and eyes. Since June 2021, the use of paraquat dichloride requires mitigation measures to reduce risks to human health due to use of this herbicide. • Mancozeb. A broad -spectrum contact fungicide. Ethylene thiourea, a breakdown product of Mancozeb, is known to cause goiter and may cause birth defects. • Simazine. A herbicide that can cause short -term and long-term health impacts to humans, such as changes to weight and blood, tremors, damage to kidneys, liver, and thyroid, and potential cancer.
• Diuron. A residual herbicide that controls grasses and broadleaf weeds in areas not intended to bear vegetation, such as rights -of-way, highways, and railways that can cause birth defects, damage lungs, impact liver function, and irritate the skin, eyes, nose, and throat.

As shown in Figure 9 -8, the CalEnviroScreen 4.0 pesticide use indicator scores are high in most areas of Hanford, except for the center most census tract . This is consistent with the community survey results where

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 39
air pollution from pesticides or dust was one of the most frequently reported source of pollution in both the Community of Focus (60 percent) and outside of the Community of Focus (52 percent).

Hanford is surrounded by farmland with some areas of the city having little to no buffer between residential and agricultural uses, making these areas more susceptible to pesticide drift. For many Central California residents, the hazards of living in close proximity to farmland is a commonly accepted risk ; however, it is important to address ways to mitigate the negative effects of pesticide use while minimizing impacts on the agricultural industry.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

40 City of Hanford
Figure 9-8: CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Pesticide Use

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 41
Drinking Water Contaminants
Public water systems in California generally have a high rate of compliance with drinking water standards set by the State. However, contaminants may still be introduced into the water system by a variety of sources including natural occurrence, accidental discharge, industrial release, and agricultu ral runoff. Exposure to contaminants in drinking water, even in small amounts, can have adverse health effects over time such as cancer and pulmonary issues.

CalEnviroScreen’s Drinking Water Contaminants Indicator is a measure of a combination of contaminant data that takes into account the average concentrations of 16 contaminants and violations compared to other census tracts. No census tracts in Hanford, including within the Community of Focus, have a drinking water contaminants indicator score above 75. Most census tracts in the city are between the 43 rd and 68th percentile, with census tract 11 having the highest percentile score in the city at 70. Table 9-13 shows percentile scores for each contaminant and violation above 0.0 for all census tracts in Hanford . The following drinking water contaminants have the highest percentile scores in Hanford out of the 16 contaminants and violations CalEnviroScreen 4.0 measures for in its Drinking Water Contaminants Indicator:
• Arsenic: A naturally occurring component of many rocks and sediments that can be released into groundwater following mining and other human activities. Arsenic is toxic at low levels and is a known carcinogen.
• Gross alpha: Gross alpha contamination arises from energy released from the breakdown or decay of radioactive elements. Gross alpha radiation is naturally found in the Earth's crust and can contaminate local drinking water systems if wells are drilled into or near natural rock formations that contain radioactive elements. When inhaled or ingested, gross alpha contamination can increase risk of bone cancer and kidney damage.
• Total coliforms: Coliforms are bacteria found in the digestive tracts and waste of animals. Their presence in water systems indicates fecal contamination and can cause serious illness if ingested, depending on the specific strain(s) of coliforms present. • Total trihalomethanes: Trihalomethanes are a group of disinfection byproducts that form when water disinfectants, such as chlorine or ozone, react with other naturally occurring chemicals in the water. These byproducts may be carcinogenic to humans.

However, it should be noted that census tracts 10.01 and 11 have unusually high percentile score s for maximum contaminant level violations for lead and copper as well as for gross alpha contamination compared to other census tracts in the city and state. Th e high percentile score for lead and copper contaminants is likely due to lead and copper entering the drinking water system through plumbing materials such as pipes, faucets, fixtures, and water mains, particularly those built prior to 1986.

Additionally, census tracts 7.01 and 7.02 have unusually high percentile scores for 1,2,3-Trichloropropane contamination/violation compared to other census tracts in the city and state . 1,2,3-Trichloropropane is used as a paint or varnish remover, cleaning and degreasing agent , and solvent, and can cause eye and throat irritation, liver and kidney damage, reduced body weight, and may be carcinogenic. Exposure to this compound usually occurs from industrial settings or hazardous waste sites.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

42 City of Hanford
Table 9-13: Drinking Water Contaminants Contaminant and Violation Scores Contaminant or
Violation
Census Tracts in the Community of Focus Census Tracts Outside of the Community of Focus 8 9.01 9.02 10.02 10.03 11 12* 6.02 6.03 6.04 7.01 7.02 10.01 1,2,3-
Trichloropropane
(TCP)

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 92.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 94.87 99.04 0.00 Arsenic 99.77 96.36 96.36 96.67 99.19 99.50 99.92 96.82 96.72 96.72 97.24 99.44 99.91 Gross Alpha 84.12 52.93 52.93 53.94 76.08 90.02 99.94 53.34 72.90 72.90 63.23 44.40 81.07 Haloacetic Acids 32.10 42.87 42.87 42.87 42.87 46.50 22.76 42.87 42.87 42.87 42.59 37.72 43.57 Lead and Copper
Rule (lead only)

71.29 69.64 69.64 70.89 72.37 70.87 82.95 68.73 49.46 49.46 71.06 78.78 57.29 Maximum
Contaminant Level
(MCL) Violations &
Lead and Copper
Rule, Lead Action
Level Exceedances

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 92.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 90.98 Nitrate as N 38.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.28 27.95 98.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.17 0.00 0.00 Total Coliform Rule
(TCR) Violations

99.90 99.90 99.90 99.90 99.90 99.69 99.9 99.90 99.90 99.90 99.90 99.90 99.79 Total
Trihalomethanes
(THM)

59.36 98.12 98.12 97.89 94.06 92.66 18.67 97.19 32.18 32.18 97.29 81.85 43.25 Note: This table only contains percentiles for contaminants and violations with a percentile above 0.0. * *Note: This data reflects that of the full census tract 12, which extends significantly beyond the Hanford city limits.

Source: CalEnviroScreen 4.0, 2025.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 43
Figure 9-9: CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Drinking Water Contaminants

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

44 City of Hanford
Groundwater Threats
Groundwater, which is water stored beneath the Earth’s surface in underground aquifers, can face various threats that can impact water quality and availability. Several commercial, industrial, and agricultural sites store and dispose of hazardous materials on land or in underground storage tanks, which can leak and contaminate soil and groundwater. Common contaminants from these sites include gasoline, heavy metals, and pesticides.

Other groundwater threats include produced water ponds, industrial sites, ai rports, dairies, dry cleaners, and publicly owned sewage treatment plants. Although these are potential groundwater threats, a leak could contaminate soil or groundwater that could expose residents to chemicals and contaminants that can have short-term or long-term health impacts such as irritation, headaches, dizziness, cancer, or reproductive harm.

In addition to the threat to water quality, the presence of these contaminants can limit future development or repurposing of these sites due to cleanup costs and liability concerns.

The CalEnviroScreen 4.0 groundwater threat indicator identifies cleanup sites that could potentially impact groundwater based on type of site and proximity to residentially populated areas based on information from the State Water Resources Control Board ( SWRCB). The SWRCB's GeoTracker Database identifies 14 groundwater threat sites in Hanford, 11 of which are in the Hanford Community of Focus (see Table 9-14).

Figure 9-10 shows groundwater threat sites and CalEnviroScreen 4.0 census tract groundwater threat scores in Hanford. Five of the six census tracts in the Hanford Community of Focus have a groundwater threat percentile score of 82 or higher compared to other census tracts in California.

Table 9-14: Groundwater Threat Sites in the Community of Focus Site Cleanup Status Site Name Potential Contaminant of Concern Open - Site Assessment Southern California Gas
Company, Hanford
• Metals/heavy metals: Metallic elements
with high densities that can be toxic and
can cause cancer, organ damage, nervous
system damage, and stunted development.
• Petroleum/fuels/oils: A product high in
hydrocarbons that can cause respiratory
illness, irritate skin, cause neurological
issues, and increase the risk of certain
cancers.

Open - Remediation Safeway Store 1988 Ust
Release
• Diesel from Underground Storage Tank
(UST): A light, refined petroleum product
that, when stored in leaking USTs, can
contaminate soil, pollute groundwater, and
increase cancer risks.

Open - Remediation 5th & Williams
Commingled Plume
• Diesel from Underground Storage Tank
(UST): A light, refined petroleum product
that, when stored in leaking USTs, can
contaminate soil, pollute groundwater, and
increase cancer risks.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 45
Table 9-14: Groundwater Threat Sites in the Community of Focus Site Cleanup Status Site Name Potential Contaminant of Concern Open - Verification
Monitoring
Silvas Oil Company • Diesel from Underground Storage Tank (UST): A light, refined petroleum product
that, when stored in leaking USTs, can
contaminate soil, pollute groundwater, and
increase cancer risks.

Open Matls Recovery Facility • None specified
Open Kings County Land
Disposal Site - Hanford
Facility
• None specified
Open - Inactive Sanchez & Sanchez
Grain
• None specified
Open - Remediation Liquid Chemical Corp. • Cadmium, lead, metals/heavy metals, other metal: Metallic elements with high
densities that can be toxic and can cause
cancer, organ damage, nervous system
damage, and stunted development.

Open - Closed/with
Monitoring
Houston Ave Landfill • None specified
Open - Site Assessment Sanchez Property
(Former Houston Ave
Landfill)
• Diesel and jet fuel range petroleum
hydrocarbons: Products high in
hydrocarbons that can cause respiratory
illness, irritate skin, cause cardiovascular
issues, and increase the risk of certain
cancers.
• Semi-volatile organic compounds: Gases
emitted from certain solids or liquids that
can harm reproductive systems, increase
risk of asthma, and increase risk of lower
birth weight.

Open - Site Assessment Blair Field • Pesticides/herbicides: A group of chemicals used to control insects and weeds in
agricultural crops that can cause illness,
birth defects, and various cancers.

Open - Site Assessment Simplot – Hanford • Nitrate: A chemical present in agricultural fertilizers, animal waste, and septic systems
that can contaminate groundwater that can
impact how blood carries oxygen and
potentially cause methemoglobinemia.
• Pentachloronitrobenzene: An agricultural
fungicide that may cause liver cancer and
skin irritation.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

46 City of Hanford
Table 9-14: Groundwater Threat Sites in the Community of Focus Site Cleanup Status Site Name Potential Contaminant of Concern • Other insecticides/pesticide/
fumigants/herbicides: A group of chemicals
used to control insects, weeds and plant
diseases in agricultural crops that can cause
illness, birth defects, and various cancers.

Open - Remediation Viking Ready Mix • None specified
Open - Inactive Britz Hanford • None specified
Source: State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) GeoTracker Database , 2025.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 47
Figure 9-10: CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Groundwater Threats

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

48 City of Hanford
Hazardous and Solid Waste
Certain facilities, such as factories, manufacturers, and other businesses use chemicals that generate hazardous waste that can be harmful to health and the environment. Hazardous waste can be liquids, solids, or gases and can range from automobile oil to highly toxic chemicals used at heavy industrial sites. Negative effects of living near a hazardous waste site include possible air, water, or soil contamination, decreased property values, and economic disinvestment.

Solid waste refers to household garbage and similar kinds of waste. Solid waste facilities, such as landfills, where waste is processed and stored, can increase heavy truck traffic, odors, pests, and potential exposure to hazardous substances. These effects can make surrounding neighborhoods less desirable for development leading to lower property values or lack of economic investment.

Both hazardous waste generators and solid waste facilities are typically located in industrial zoned areas that can affect nearby residential communities.

According to CalEnviroScreen 4.0, there are 13 hazardous waste generators and two solid waste facilities in the Hanford Community of Focus (see Figure 9-11 and Figure 9-12). Some hazardous waste generators in this area include medical uses, such as the Adventist Health Medical Center and various pharmacies; however, others are industrial uses such as auto repair shops and other general industrial facilities. All hazardous waste generators are located near or immediately adjacent to residential areas. Solid waste facilities include the Houston Avenue Landfill and the E & B Bulk Transportation facility; neither of these facilities are immediately adjacent to residential neighborhoods.

In addition to waste facilities, in the community survey , a majority respondents in the Community of Focus (60 percent) reported “trash and illegal dumping” as a source of pollution in their neighborhood, compared to only 19 percent of respondents outside of the Community of Focus. Trash and illegal dumping not only present a health risk to residents but also impact the comfort and aesthetics of a community.

Toxic Releases
Some industrial facilities can release toxic chemicals into the air that present potential health risks to surrounding communities. Environmental justice communities tend to be at higher risk of exposure to toxic chemicals, because low-income neighborhoods tend to be located in closer proximity to industrial areas.

The U.S. EPA maintains a Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) to track the release of toxic chemicals from industrial facilities. According to the TRI, there is one facility in Hanford that releases toxic chemicals in Census Tract 12, located south of the Community of Focus in a primarily industrial area (see Figure 9-11). Ammonia is the only noted chemical released by this facility in Hanford . Exposure to ammonia can cause burning of the eyes, nose, throat, and respiratory tract, as well as blindness and lung damage.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 49
Figure 9-11: CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Hazardous Waste Generators

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

50 City of Hanford
Figure 9-12: CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Solid Waste Generators

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 51
Cleanup Sites
Cleanup sites are properties that are contaminated with hazardous materials and require cleanup actions from the property owners before new development or operations can happen on that site. Cleanup sites not only present an increased risk of exposure to hazardous materials but can also increase the amount of underutilized land in a community due to high cleanup costs and risk of liability, limiting the benefit of that land to the surrounding community.

As shown in Figure 9-13, there are five cleanup sites in Hanford, four of which are in a Community of Focus.

Census tract 8 has the highest cleanup sites indicator percentile score of all census tracts in the city at 83. Census tracts in the Community of Focus generally have a higher percentile score for this metric than other areas of the city, ranging from 51 t o 63; however, census tracts 10.02 and 10.03 have a percentile score of 0 for this metric.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

52 City of Hanford
Figure 9-13: CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Cleanup Sites

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 53

9.5.3 Healthy Food Access
Adequate access to healthy, affordable, and culturally appropriate food is key to high quality of life in any community. Food access is determined not only by physical proximity to grocery stores and other food providers, but also the affordability and availability of healthy foods. Environmental justice communities often have a more difficult time achieving food security than other areas since residents in these communities tend to be lower income, are less likely to have regular access to a vehicle.

Food Environment
The food environment represents the quantity and type of food providers in a community, such as grocery stores, farmer’s markets, food banks, and community gardens. The food environment also represents the presence of unhealthy food options in a community, such as liquor stores and fast food.

Grocery Store Access
As of 2025, there are a total of 12 grocery stores within the Hanford city limits. Of those 12 grocery stores, six are located within the Community of Focus, and six are located just outside of the Community of Focus but within half a mile walking distance. Figure 9-14 and Table 9 -15 show the locations of grocery stores within Hanford as well as residential areas that are within half a mile walking distance of each store. Approximately 54 percent of residential parcels in the Community of Focus are within half a mile of a grocery store, which is higher than other residential parcels in the city.

While it is essential for jurisdictions to strive for increased grocery store access in their communities, the current access to grocery stores appears to be sufficient in meeting the needs of the residents in the Hanford Community of Focus . Grocery stores within half a mile walking distance to Community of Focus residents include:
• Best Buy Market IGA: 1798 N 10th Ave, Hanford, CA, 93230 • Save Mart: 715 W Grangeville Blvd, Hanford, CA, 93230 • United Market: 426 E 7th St, Hanford, CA, 93230
• Harrods Market: 110 E 6th St, Hanford, CA, 93230
• Smart & Final: 552 N 11th Ave, Hanford, CA, 93230
• Cost Less Food Company: 102 S 11th Ave, Hanford, CA, 93230 • El Rey Supermercado: 10833 Hanford Armona Rd, Hanford, CA, 93230 • ALDI: 1789 W Lacey Blvd, Hanford, CA, 93230
• Foods Co.: 1850 W Lacey Blvd, Hanford, CA, 93230
• Walmart Supercenter: 250 S 12th Ave, Hanford, CA, 93230 • Mercado & Carniceria Del Valle: 1120 N 10th Ave #7201, Hanford, CA, 93230 • Target Grocery: 140 12th Ave, Hanford, CA, 93230

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

54 City of Hanford
Table 9-15: Percentage of Residential Areas within ½ mile of a Grocery Store Hanford Community of
Focus
Non-Community of
Focus Hanford, CA
Number of Residential
Parcels
6,115 9,138 15,253
Number of Residential
Parcels within ½ mile
of a grocery store
3,140 3,466 6,606
Percentage of
Residential Parcels
within ½ mile of a
grocery store

51.4% 37.9% 43.3%
Source: City of Hanford, Mintier Harnish, 2025.

Two of the six grocery stores within the Community of Focus are cultural grocery stores, which carry products specific to certain cultures that are not necessarily carried by mainstream supermarkets. Research has shown that culturally specific grocery stores are importan t not only to increasing food availability, but also in maintaining cultural traditions and affirming group identity and community. All cultural grocery stores in Hanford are located within the Community of Focus.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 55
Figure 9-14: Food Environment and Grocery Store Accessibility

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

56 City of Hanford
Farmers’ Market and Alternative Food Sources
In addition to grocery stores, farmers markets, fruit stands, and community or personal gardens are alternative ways for residents to access fresh fruits and vegetables. Hanford has the following alternative markets:
• The Hanford Thursday Night Market Place is held
on Thursday evenings in the Civic Park in central
Hanford from May through October. The Market has
a program that allows CalFresh participants to
purchase EBT tokens that can be used in place of cash
at vendor stalls. Only 14 percent of community survey
respondents reported the Thursday Night Market as a
place where they regularly purchase fresh fruits and
vegetables, suggesting the Market is used more as a
source of entertainment rather than a source for
groceries.
• Alma's Flea Market and the Marketa El
Swapmeet, both of which are held at 8967 Lacey
Boulevard in Hanford, within the Community of
Focus. Alma’s Flea Market is held every Monday from
6:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. year-round. The Marketa El
Swapmeet is held Wednesday through Sunday from
7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. year -round. These markets are
an additional source of fresh produce that expands
residents’ access to fresh food and groceries.
• Community and personal gardens are another way for residents to access fresh fruits and vegetables; however, this requires space, upfront costs, and specialized knowledge that many residents may not have access to due to income, space, or education. Hanford has three community gardens in or near the Community of Focus.
• Food banks and similar programs help low-income households obtain fresh, canned, and frozen food and meals necessary to fill gaps in food assistance programs such as CalFresh. Food banks are often operated by non-profit or religious organizations and provide boxes of ingredients and/or fresh meals to low-income households on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis. There are eight food banks/free meal programs in Hanford, six of which are located in the Community of Focus.

CalFresh Benefits
CalFresh, known federally as SNAP
(Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program), is a public program that
provides assistance to low -income
individuals and families to purchase
food. Eligible participants receive a
monthly Electronic Benefit Transfer
(EBT) c ard, similar to a debit card,
loaded with funds to buy groceries at
approved retailers. The amount a
household receives is based on factors
like income, expenses, and family size.

Although city -specific data is not
available for CalFresh participation,
about 20 percent of Kings County
residents participate in CalFresh.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 57

Food Insecurity
While there are several grocery stores both within and immediately adjacent to the Community of Focus, other factors such as household income can impact an individual's ability to purchase healthy foods on a regular basis.

The median income of most census tracts within the Community of Focus ranges from $ 33,750 to $67,009, which is lower than the citywide and countywide median incomes ($73,544 and 68,750, respectively ). Census tract 10.03 is the only census tract in the Community of Focus with a median income higher than those of the city and county ($83,167).

Barriers to Healthy Food Access
Households that do not have access to a vehicle or dependable public transportation may have a harder time getting to and from a grocery store. As shown in Table 9 -16, four census tracts in the Community of Focus have a much higher percentage of housing units with no access to a vehicle compared to the city and county, however, no respondents in the community survey indicated transportation to and from grocery stores as a major barrier to eating healthy foods. The most commonly reported barrier to healthy food access, according to community survey responses, is healthy food being too expensive.

Table 9-16: Household Access to Vehicles

Census Tracts in the Community of Focus
Hanford,
CA
Kings
County 8 9.01 9.02 10.02 10.03 11 12
Percent Occupied
Housing Units with
No Vehicle
Available

8.1% 30.3% 12.0% 23.6% 0.5% 11.4% 0.0% 8.0% 5.8%
Note: This table only contains percentiles for contaminants and violations with a percentile above 0.0.

Source: US Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2023), Table S2504.

9.5.4 Physical Activity
Regular physical activity is important in maintaining good physical and mental health. The built environment, including, but not limited to, the availability and quality of parks, open spaces, pedestrian infrastructure, and bicycle infrastructure, can sign ificantly impact the accessibility of recreational and active transportation opportunities. Environmental justice communities often have reduced access to these opportunities within their neighborhoods due to a variety of factors including the lack of phys ical infrastructure that promote physical activity (i.e., parks, sidewalks), safety concerns (i.e., crime, vehicle traffic, street -lighting), or incompatible land uses that make it uncomfortable to be outside due to noise, air quality, or heat (i.e., proxi mity to freeways, industrial uses, lack of shade and trees).

Active Transportation
Biking and walking, whether for transportation or recreation, is a low -cost way for many people to get daily physical activity if the proper infrastructure is available. Providing and maintaining safe pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure can improve access to these modes of transportation for all residents.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

58 City of Hanford
The city’s existing bicycle network has approximately six miles of Class II bicycle lanes and 25 miles of Class III bicycle routes .

As shown in Figure 9-15:, a majority of these bicycle lanes and routes are located outside of the Community of Focus . As of 2025, many Class II bicycle lanes are not continuous and often end before intersection s, creating gaps in the overall bicycle network. Additionally, many Class III bicycle routes run along major arterials, creating safety concerns for bicyclists who are not comfortable riding with vehicle traffic . Hanford has no Class I shared-use paths that would provide off -road recreation and travel routes for bicyclists.

Bicycle infrastructure and safety was one of the most commonly reported barriers to respondents riding a bike, or similar forms of transportation, both within the Community of Focus and citywide. Other major barriers to riding a bike and similar forms of transportation included feeling uncomfortable riding close or alongside traffic and it being unpleasant to ride due to pollution, noise, or lack of shade.

Bicycle Infrastructure Classifications
Class II bicycle lanes are separated
bicycle lanes that are located on a
roadway used by motor vehicles, and
Class III bicycle routes, also known as
“sharrows,” are roadways where
bicyclists and motor vehicles share the
road, with no separated lanes for
bicyclists.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 59
Figure 9-15: Existing Bicycle Network
Source: Hanford Active Transportation Plan, 2025.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

60 City of Hanford
Park Accessibility
The parkland discussed in this section represents only publicly accessible park and recreation spaces that are owned, operated, and maintained by the City of Hanford. While public and private schools often provide open recreational areas and park -like spaces that are available to the general public, these properties are not under City jurisdiction and are therefore not included in this inventory or analysis. Nonetheless, school -based recreational spaces remain an important community resource and contribute meaningfully to park access and recreational opportunities. Continued coordination between the city, school districts, and private landowners is encouraged to help preserve, maintain, and maximize shared community benefits from these spaces.

Access to quality parks and other recreational areas promote physical activity and provide green spaces that help reduce the effects of air pollution and extreme heat. There are 31 parks and five sports fields in Hanford, eight of which are located within the Community of Focus:
• Civic Center Park is located at 401 N Irwin Street. The park is approximately 6.1 acres and includes green space, a plaza, and a fountain.
• Lacey Park is located at 112 Florinda Street. The park is approximately 2.5 acres and includes a playground, green space, splash pad, basketball courts, and picnic shelter. • Johnson Park is located at 1502 N Brown Street. The park is approximately 4.1 acres and includes a playground and green space.
• Coe Park is located at 543 S Douty Street. The park is approximately 4.1 acres and includes a playground, green space, splash pad, and picnic shelter. • Brown Street BMX Park is located at 501 S Brown Street. The park is approximately 4.6 acres and includes a BMX track.
• Harris Street Ball Park is located just south of the intersection of South Harris Street and East Ball Park Alley. The park is approximately 4.6 acres and includes a baseball field. • Centennial Park is located at 1355 Hanford Armona Road. The park is approximately 14.1 acres and includes a playground, green space, barbeque grills, picnic tables, a volleyball court, several basketball courts, and a dog park.
• Longfield Center is located at 560 S Douty Street. The park is approximately 2.2 acres and includes green space and a recreation center which facilitates periodic community meetings.

Figure 9-16 shows the locations of parks and recreation sites within Hanford as well as a half mile buffer area around each park. As shown in Table 9-17:, about 64 percent of residential parcels in the Community of Focus are within a half mile walking distance of a park or recreational site, which is about 21 percent lower than other residential areas in the city.

In addition to its existing parks spaces, the City of Hanford is developing a new park in the eastern portion of the city named Heroes Park approximately a half mile from the Community of Focus . Heroes Park will be a 40-acre regional park located near the intersection of Grangeville Boulevard and 9 1/4 Avenue. The property is not currently within City limits but will be annexed in the future . The parks amenities, chosen by the community, will include: three multi-use athletic fields, two play structures with shade, a dog park, an outdoor

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 61
amphitheater, 16 pickleball courts, 18-hole frisbee disc golf course, a skatepark, two basketball courts, a workout area, water feature, open space area, community garden/learning garden, three shade areas, parking area with charging stations, and two restrooms.

In the community survey, Respondents outside of the Community of Focus more frequently identified public parks (37 percent) as needing improvement, whereas only about 13 percent of respondents in the Community of Focus reported parks as needing improvement . Respondents in the Community of Focus more frequently reported recreational facilities (e.g., swimming pools, sports fields) needing improvement (27 percent of respondents).

Table 9-17: Percentage of Residential Areas within ½ mile of a Park Hanford Community of
Focus
Non-Community of
Focus City of Hanford
Number of Residential
Parcels
6,115 9,138 15,253
Number of Residential
Parcels within ½ mile
of a park
3,896 7,733 11,629
Percentage of
Residential Parcels
within ½ mile of a park

63.7% 84.6% 76.2%
Source: City of Hanford, Mintier Harnish, 2025.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

62 City of Hanford
Figure 9-16: Park Accessibility

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 63

9.5.5 Public Facilities
Public facilities include public service and amenities such as community centers, libraries, public transit, parks and recreation facilities, water and sewer services, streets and sidewalks, and health care services. Environmental justice communities often lack access to some or many of these public facilities, or the facilities that do exist are in poor condition, due to lack of transportation, underinvestment, or lack of engagement between public agencies and these communities when decisions on public fac ilities are being made. A lack of access to public facilities can negatively impact health care access, educational opportunities, physical and mental health, and overall quality of life.

Educational Facilities
Educational attainment can be a predictor of income, socioeconomic status, and health. People with higher educational attainment not only tend to have higher incomes than people with lower educational attainment, but also tend to be at lower risk of seriou s health conditions and pollution exposure. Access to educational institutions such as primary and secondary schools; continuing education; and community colleges and universities are important in providing educational opportunities to environmental justice communities.

Primary and Secondary Schools
Primary and secondary schools include schools that
serve kindergarten through 12th grade. Hanford has
seven school districts, four of which serve the
Community of Focus, including the Hanford
Elementary School District, Kit Carson Union
Elementary School District, Armona Union
Elementary School District, and Hanford Joint
Union High School District . These districts serve
residents living in the Hanford Community of Focus
as well as surrounding unincorporated areas,
including Armona and Home Garde n. As shown in
Figure 9-17, out of 21 public schools in the city, ten are located within the Community of Focus ,
including five elementary schools, two junior high
schools, two high schools, and one special education
school for students aged three to 23 years. In addition to the city’s public schools, there are five
private/charter schools in Hanford, three of which are located in the Community of Focus: Learn4Life - Kings Valley Academy II, Crossroads Charter Academy, and St. Rose-McCarthy Catholic School, both charter schools offer elementary through high school and St. Rose-McCarthy offers preschool through 8 th grade. All schools within the Community of Focus have adequate sidewalks immediately adjacent to school campuses; however, students may face difficulties safely walking home, as sidewalks are not present along all streets in the city.

Community Survey – Public Facilities
Citywide, the public facility in most need of
improvement is roadway maintenance with 50
percent of respondents selecting it in the
community survey.

Of the answer options, streetlights (24 percent)
and access to high -speed internet (26 percent)
were also top responses citywide. Although the
response rate for high-speed internet access was
similar within the Community of Focus and
outside the Community of Focus, respondents
in the Community of Focus selected streetlights
as a facility needing improvement (40 percent)
than respondents outside the Community of
Focus (15 percent).

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

64 City of Hanford
Figure 9-17: Educational Institutions in Hanford

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 65
Continuing and Higher Education
Hanford Joint Union High School District offers continuing education programs for adults to earn their high school diplomas or GED, complete English language courses, and complete career technical programs (including nursing assistant, welding, and pottery courses) . These courses are provided at the Hanford Adult School, located at 905 Campus Drive in Hanford. Although this school is located just outside of the Community of Focus, courses offered through the school are free to residents.

There are thr ee higher education facilities in Hanford, including the one community college (College of the Sequoias Hanford Campus), and two cosmetology schools (each operated by Lawrence & Company College of Cosmetology). Only the College of the Sequoias Hanford Campus is located outside of the Community of Focus.

Public Libraries
Libraries are an important public service that ensure that books, literary resources, media, databases, and services are accessible to the public. Hanford has one public library, located at 401 N Douty Street in Hanford.

The library is a branch of the Kings County Library system and offers access to books, eBooks, digital media loans, research databases, and computers, as well as printing services, and meeting room spaces. The library also provides access to the Kings County Career Online High School, which offers adult residents with the opportunity to earn an accredited high school diploma and a career certificate. The Hanford Public Library is located within the Community of Focus.

Public Transportation
Public transportation can serve as an important public service, especially for households and individuals who do not have regular access to a personal vehicle or are unable to walk or bike. Hanford is served by two transit providers, Amtrak and Kings Area Rural Transit (KART), that offer route connections to local and regional destinations. KART offers eight local bus routes that extend out from the downtown, connecting to medical centers, schools, and shopping areas. Regionally, the Hanford Amtrak station is located downtown and provides connections to Bakersfield, Fresno, Stockton, and the Bay Area. Low -income residents, residents without vehicle access, and youth depend on transit for their daily transportation needs.

As shown in Figure 9-18, KART operates eight fixed bus routes which operate year-round. Bus routes through Hanford operate from Monday through Saturday. All of these routes run through the Community of Focus, including Route 1 (Green Line), Route 2 (Orange Line), Route 3 (Purple Line, Route 4 (Brown Line), Route 5 (Pink Line), Route 6 (Blue Line), Route 7 (Red Line), and Route 9 (Yellow Line). KART also operates bus routes through other nearby communities, including Lemoore, Avenal, Corcoran , Laton, Visalia, and Fresno.

In addition to its fixed-route services, KART offers “flex routes” that are available on reservation and pick up and drop off residents at designated KART bus stops, as well as on -demand services that offer affordable rideshare services. KART Paratransit is available to eligible certified ADA passengers.

The main KART transit center for the City is located within the Community of Focus , bounded by Eight h Street, Harris Strret, Seventh Street , and Brown Steet. One-way fares are $1. 25 for local routes and $1.75 for “out-of-town routes.” KART provides discounted fares for seniors and free ridership to children six years old and younger.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

66 City of Hanford
Figure 9-18: Public Transit System in Hanford

Route 4 (Brown Line)
Route 5 (Pink Line)
Route 1(Green Line)
Route 2 (Orange Line)
Route 3 (Purple Line)
Route 6 (Blue Line)
Route 9 (Yellow Line)
Route 7 (Red Line)

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 67
Medical and Emergency Services
Hospitals
Living close to a range of nearby medical facilities greatly improves access to necessary healthcare. According to the California Department of Public Health, there are 25 medical facilities in Hanford. Of these facilities, there are 13 community/health clinics, three end stage renal dialysis/chronic dialysis clinics, three skilled nursing facilities, one home health agency, one hospice center, three ambulatory surgical centers, and one general acute care hospital that provides emergency services.

Emergency Facilities
In times of emergency, it is important for citizens to have nearby emergency services to ensure prompt, safe handling of a variety of urgent situations. Close proximity to emergency services such as fire and police stations increases the response time to emergency situations that can affect the life and safety of residents. This section discusses the emergency facilities available in Hanford.

Police station
Police departments are an important community service that maintain public order and safety, enforce the law, and investigate criminal activity. The Hanford Police Department is the only police station in the city and is located at 425 N Irwin Street in Hanford . The department consists of seven units, including the Patrol Operations, Traffic Unit, Homeless Assistance Resource Team, SWAT team, Detective Bureau, School Resource Officers, and Communication Center. The Hanford police station is located within the Community of Focus.

Fire stations
The Hanford Fire Department responds to all types of fires, rescues, emergency medial responses, traffic accidents, hazardous conditions, explo sions, and public service requests. The Department has ten firefighters on duty daily. The Department has set a dispatch processing and travel time goal of four minutes or less for 90 percent of incidents; in 2023, the Department met this goal for 60 to 68 percent of incidents, depending on the month. The Hanford Fire Department has three stations throughout the city which are staffed 24 hours a day, 365 days a year and are located at the following addresses:
• Hanford Fire Department Station 1: 350 W Grangeville Blvd • Hanford Fire Department Station 2: 10553 Houston Ave
• Hanford Fire Department Station 3: 1070 S 12th Ave
Hanford Fire Department Station 3 is located within the Community of Focus; however, firefighters from other stations may respond to calls originating from within the Community of Focus, depending on type of incident, location, existing or potential emergencies, and resources available.

A future City fire station is set to be located at Heroes Park, which will be located within half a mile east of the Community of Focus. For more information on Heroes Park, please refer to the “Parks Accessibility” section above.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

68 City of Hanford
Community Centers
Community centers are important community assets that help provide programs and resources that support physical activity, educational opportunities, social services, youth services, and community involvement.

Community centers can also serve as important community partners for government agencies since they often have established trust in the community and are already implementing programs in line with environmental justice goals. Effective environmental justice policies can help support services offered by community centers in environmental justice communities and encourage continued partnerships with these centers to increase transparency and connection with community. The following community centers and resource centers are in the Community of Focus:
• Hanford Civic Auditorium (400 N Douty Street) provides a space for social and business events.

The west wing seats 50 and the Main Hall seats 500. Costs of booking the space varies between rooms and types of functions.
• Veterans/Senior Center ( 401 N Irwin Street ) offers a variety of room sizes from the Veterans Hall, which seats 100, to the Meeting Room , which seats 50 . Rates vary based on the room .

Kitchen and equipment may also be rented from the Center. • Children’s Storybook Garden & Museum (175 E 10th St) is a not-for-profit educational garden and museum with activities and programs that cover horticulture, literacy, CA farm history, healthy eating, fitness, art, music, drama, and life sciences. The Garden and Museum aim to be affordable for all members of the community.

9.5.6 Safe and Sanitary Housing
Housing conditions contribute to the overall health and safety of residents. Household income heavily determines the type, location, and quality of housing someone lives in since newer housing in neighborhoods with more community amenities (i.e., good schools, parks, safe streets) tend to be more expensive. Occupants of housing built before the widespread adoption of building standards and regulations are at higher risk of pollution exposure in their homes, particularly asbestos and lead. Additionally, olde r housing may have poor ventilation that can lead to mold, uncomfortable indoor temperatures, and increased exposure to indoor and outdoor pollutants.

Household overcrowding can also have serious health impacts on occupants. Overcrowding occurs when the number of occupants in a household exceeds the capacity of a dwelling unit, typically measured by the number of rooms and the age and relationship of the occupants. Overcrowding can lead to a variety of adverse health outcomes, such as exposure to infectious disease, increased stress, and sleep disorders. High rent and home prices increase risks of overcrowding and homelessness and leave households with le ss income to spend on home improvement/repairs, healthy food, healthcare, and other goods and services. The following sections describe the existing housing conditions in Hanford.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 69
Lead Exposure
Lead is a toxic heavy metal that can enter the bloodstream and cause serious neurological or behavioral health problems, especially in young children due to their developing brains and increased risk of exposure.

Historically, lead was used as an additive in house paint, plumbing materials, and gasoline. Although the use of lead in common household items and building materials is now regulated, house paint is still a significant source of lead exposure in older, unrenovated homes.

CalEnviroScreen 4.0’s Children’s Lead Risk from Housing indicator calculates lead exposure risk by combining the percentage of homes with a higher likelihood of having lead-based paint (LBP) hazards and the percentage of low-income households with children. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 calculates the likelihood of LBP hazards based on the age of housing. Generally, older homes tend to have a higher risk of LBP hazards.

As shown in Figure 9-19, census tracts in the Community of Focus have much higher children’s lead risk from housing scores than other areas of the city. Census tracts 9.01 and 9.02 have the highest score for this indicator out of all census tracts in the city at 97, meaning that these census tracts have a higher potential risk for lead exposure in children living in low-income communities with older housing than 97 percent of census tracts in California. Other census tracts in the Community of Focus range from the 35th to the 78th percentile for this indicator.

According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), homes built prior to 1978 are at a much higher risk of LBP exposure if proper measures have not been taken to test for and mitigate the presence of LBT in the home. As shown in Table 9-18:, census tracts 9.01 and 9.02 have a much higher percentage of homes built prior to 1980 (74 percent and 85 percent, respectively) compared to other census tracts, the city, and the county. This indicates that housing units in these census tracts are at a higher risk of LBP exposure.

Additionally, renters in these areas may not have the knowledge of the home’s history and renovations or may not be aware of the presence of LBP in their residence.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

70 City of Hanford
Figure 9-19: CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Children’s Lead Risk from Housing

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 71
Housing Conditions
The conditions of the existing housing stock can be an indicator of the living standards of residents. Although the data on housing conditions is limited, the U.S. Census provides information on the availability of plumbing and kitchen facilities as well as the age of the housing stock (year the structure was built), which can provide a starting point for assessing the conditions of the existing housing stock. Housing units typically require more repairs and renovations as they get older to maintain a good condition, therefore knowing the year a housing unit/structure was built can be an initial indicator of substandard conditions. Homes typically start needing major repairs (i.e., roofing, major appliances, heating and air conditioning systems) after 20 to 25 years.

As shown in Table 9-18, a majority of housing units in the Community of Focus, with the exception of census tract 10.03, were built prior to 2000, suggesting that many housing units have already undergone major improvements or repairs, or will be in need of these improvements in t he near future. Census tracts 9.01 and

9.02 have the highest percentage of homes built prior to 1980, indicating that a higher percentage of homes in these census tracts may need major repairs. Census tracts in the Community of Foc us generally have much higher proportions of older houses than other census tracts in the city, indicating that many homeowners in the Community of Focus may face higher financial strain than other areas in the city due to the need for costly repairs to older homes. Lower-income residents who are unable to afford any needed repairs to older homes and cannot afford to move may be at a higher risk of living in a home that is not comfortable or safe.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

72 City of Hanford
Table 9-18: Age of Housing Stock
Year Structure
Built
Census Tracts in the Community of Focus Census Tracts Outside of the Community of Focus Hanford,
CA
Kings
County 8 9.01 9.02 10.02 10.03 11 12* 6.02 6.03 6.04 7.01 7.02 10.01 Built 2020 or later 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 126 0 7 0 98 221 502 Built 2010 to 2019 0 0 59 0 369 72 19 25 221 459 8 41 392 1,631 3,875 Built 2000 to 2009 32 0 0 56 566 102 74 324 606 1085 126 168 592 3,599 8,396 Built 1990 to 1999 338 97 0 63 323 302 71 669 41 436 523 293 257 3,156 7,910 Built 1980 to 1989 317 338 111 322 208 402 89 447 0 286 409 645 193 3,542 6,584 Built 1970 to 1979 154 257 270 248 296 461 186 197 10 105 346 429 338 2,910 6,956 Built 1960 to 1969 330 63 123 218 136 222 42 152 8 83 389 61 59 1,630 4,525 Built 1950 to 1959 264 354 148 125 17 193 96 218 0 0 216 27 78 1,398 3,294 Built 1940 to 1949 87 89 110 70 60 202 77 181 0 0 94 0 17 840 2,100 Total Housing
Units
1,535 1,655 1,166 1,143 1,975 2,014 754 2279 1012 2492 2127 1664 2038 19,912 46,695 Percentage of
occupied housing
units built prior to
1980

55.2% 73.7% 85.4% 61.4% 25.8% 55.3% 66.4% 35.7% 1.8% 9.1% 49.6% 31.1% 24.8% 39.0% 41.6% *Note: This data reflects that of the full census tract 12, which extends significantly beyond the Hanford city limits.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (B03002), 2023.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 73
Housing Cost Burden
A household is considered cost burdened when more than
30 percent of the household income is spent on housing ( e.g., rent, mortgage payment, utilities) and severely cost burdened when more than 50 percent of the household income is spent on housing. Housing cost burden can have several negative effects on health and quality of life by limiting a household’s ability to p ay for other goods and services (e.g., food, transportation, recreation), increasing risk of overcrowding or homelessness, and limiting a household’s ability to contribute to a savings or retirement fund.

Although any household, regardless of income, can experience housing cost burden, low -income households are at higher risk of being cost burdened and severely cost burdened. As shown in Figure 9-20, census tracts

9.01 and 9.02 have higher Housing Cost Burden percentile scores than other areas of the city. As documented in the previous section, these areas also have a higher rate of older housing units that may have costly repairs or renovations that can result in higher housing maintenance costs for homeowners or increased rental costs, which can cause financial hardship for those already cost burdened.

Overcrowding
A housing unit is considered overcrowded when there is more than one person per room. Overcrowding can occur when a household either cannot find or afford housing with enough rooms to accommodate all members of the household. Table 9-19 shows that the rate of overcrowding in the Community of Focus is generally higher than in the city and county, with the exception of census tract 9.01. Census tracts 10.02 and 11 have the highest rate of overcrowded renters, while census tracts 9.02 and 10.02 have the highes t rate of overcrowded homeowners. Overcrowding is generally more prevalent amongst renters in the Community of Focus, the city, and the county.

Table 9-19: Overcrowding by Tenure

Census Tracts in the Community of Focus
Hanford,
CA
Kings
County 8 9.01 9.02 10.02 10.03 11 12*
Overcrowded
Renter
Households

21.1% 7.5% 7.2% 21.6% 20.5% 26.9% 10.5% 15.2% 12.2%
Overcrowded
Owner
Households

8.6% 1.5% 23.6% 16.5% 9.3% 11.2% 0.0% 4.8% 5.8%
*Note: This data reflects that of the full census tract 12, which extends significantly beyond the Hanford city limits.

Source: US Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2023), Table B25014.

Community Survey Results
Costs associated with housing were the
most commonly selected responses
citywide. This includes both overall
cost of housing (29 percent of survey
respondents) and the cost of make
necessary repairs (17 percent).

Policy Document

74 City of Hanford
Figure 9-20: CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Housing Cost Burden

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 75

9.5.7 Civic Engagement
Meaningful community engagement is key to creating equitable policies and programs that meet the needs of all residents. Unfortunately, many environmental justice communities have historically been excluded from these conversations, resulting in inequitable planning practices. Factors such as language barriers, time and location of public meetings, and knowledge of topics influence if and how p eople participate in the public decision-making process. Innovative engagement strategies and partnering with commu nity-based organizations (CBOs) can make community workshops and meetings more accessible to environmental justice communities. Traditional methods of community engagement, such as community meetings held at government buildings can be difficult for people to attend due to scheduling conflicts, language barriers, lack of transportation, and lack of overall trust in government agencies.

Internet Access
It is increasingly common for government agencies to post notices, documents, and informational materials online, and host virtual community meetings. Although online format s for community meetings can improve public engagement and make attending meetings more convenient for many individuals, it also requires households to have access to a computing device, such as a computer or smartphone , as well as high-speed internet, including broadband internet.

As shown in Table 9-20, the percentage of residents in census tracts 8, 9.01, 9.02, and 11 with access to at least one computer or smartphone is less than that of the city and county percentages. The percentage of residents in the Community of Focus with a broadband internet subscription is lower than the city and county percentages. This suggests that residents in the Community of Focus may have a more difficult time accessing online information or virtual meetings than other areas of the city due to a lack of dependable, high -speed internet as well as a device with which to access the internet.

Table 9-20: Access to Internet

Census Tracts in the Community of Focus
Hanford,
CA
Kings
County 8 9.01 9.02 10.02 10.03 11 12*
Percent of Households
with One or More
Computing Devices

89.1% 85.0% 73.1% 95.1% 96.3% 86.2% 93.3% 93.3% 94.3%
Percent of Households
with Broadband
Internet

83.3% 78.7% 63.3% 80.2% 86.0% 76.0% 88.0% 88.0% 87.8%
*Note: This data reflects that of the full census tract 12, which extends significantly beyond the Hanford city limits.

Source: US Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2023), Table S2801.

Policy Document

76 City of Hanford
Barriers to Community Involvement and Linguistic Isolation There are several reasons that prevent people from participating in community meetings and outreach events such as scheduling, comfort level with the subject matter or speaking in front of other people, distrust in government, or lack of knowledge about how to get involved. To get more people involved in the public decision-making process, it is important to understand why people aren’t participating and find ways to overcome those barriers.

More than 40 percent of Californians speak a language other than English at home , approximately half of which do not speak English well or at all. These households face
disadvantages when seeking information about meetings and engagement opportunities, particularly if the information and materials are solely available in English and no language interpretation/translation is available . Linguistically isolated households may also not hear or understand important
information in times of emergency.

Figure 9-21 shows that the Community of Focus has far higher rates of linguistic isolation compared to other areas of the city. Census tract 11 has the highest linguistic isolation indicator percentile score in the city at 98, meaning the percent of linguistically isolated households is higher than 98 percent of the census tracts in California. Approximately 35 percent of households in this census tract do not speak English well.

Census tract 10.02 also has a higher number of households that are linguistically isolated ; approximately 31 percent of households in this census tract do not speak English well. All other census tracts in the Community of Focus have between 13 and 17 percent of households that do not speak English well and are linguistically isolated. The top languages spoken in the Community of Focus besides English include Spanish, Tagalog (incl uding Filipino), and languages that fall into the “other Asian and Pacific Island languages” and “other Indo-European languages” categories.

Community Survey Responses
Citywide, the most common ways
people receive information about city
events and issues are through social
media (50 percent of respondents),
word of mouth (31 percent), and the
City’s website (31 percent).

The biggest barriers for respondents
participating in local meetings and
decision-making processes include not
knowing when or where meetings are
happening (21 percent), and not
feeling like their opinions will be taken
seriously by decision-makers or result
in real change (29 percent).

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 77
Figure 9-21: CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Linguistic Isolation

Policy Document

78 City of Hanford
Ensuring meaningful and effective participation from individuals with limited English proficiency requires the commitment to providing meeting notices, and informational materials in languages other than English. This can bridge barriers to participation and enable individuals with limited English proficiency to access crucial information about community meetings and engagement opportunities. Additionally, offering language interpretation services at these meetings is vital to facilitate active involvement from individuals with limited English proficiency, allowing them to fully understand discussions, express concerns, and contribute to decision-making processes.

Apart from English proficiency, many people who are proficient or native English speakers can have a difficult time understanding the terminology and subject matter related to planning documents and processes. Many planning documents can also be long, dens e, and data heavy, which can be difficult for the public to read, understand, and provide meaningful feedback on. Creating engagement and information materials in a way that is easy to understand can make the subject and processes of planning more accessible to a wider audience.

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 79

9.6 Goals and Policies
Goal EJ1 Integrate environmental justice, equity, transparency, and accountability in relevant decision-making processes. [Source: New Goal]
Policy EJ1 Environmental Justice Assessment in Decision-Making Acknowledge historical and ongoing environmental justice concerns and require analysis of potential environmental justice impacts as part of the City’s decision-making process. [Source: New policy] Policy EJ2 Environmental Justice Land Use Integration
Incorporate environmental justice principles into zoning, the General Plan, and related land use strategies , as applicable. [Source: New policy]
Policy EJ3 Community of Focus Boundary Review
Using the methodology established in this Element, periodically review the Community of Focus boundary to determine whether adjustments are needed based on new findings and environmental justice concerns. [Source:

New policy]
Policy EJ4 Partnership with Community of Focus Residents Work with Community of Focus residents to identify and implement appropriate remedies and actively implement the Environmental Justice Element in partnership with these communities. [Source: New policy] Policy EJ5 Minimizing the Urban Heat Island Effect and Climate-Responsive Design Strive to reduce the urban heat island effect by expanding Hanford’s tree canopy and incorporating climate - responsive site design practices (e.g., permeable surfaces, green infrastructure ) that increase shade, retain soil moisture, and lower surface temperatures, with a focus on heat -vulnerable neighborhoods, public spaces, and high-activity areas such as schools, parks, and transit corridors. [Source: New policy] Goal EJ2 Reduce and mitigate the negative health impacts of pollution exposure on residents of Hanford. [Source: New Goal]
Policy EJ6 Transportation Infrastructure Mitigation
Continue working with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to determine any mitigation measures that can be implemented to reduce air pollution impacts to the Community of Focus and residential areas adjacent to State Route 198. [Source: New Policy] Policy EJ7 Improve Air Quality
Encourage the retrofitting and installation of appropriate air filtration at existing schools, residences, and other sensitive receptor uses adversely affected by air pollution. [Source: New Policy] Policy EJ8 Pollution Exposure Reduction through Urban Design Identify areas of the city where additional setbacks, barriers, landscaping, or other design and development standards can be incorporated to minimize pollution exposure to sensitive land uses. [Source: New policy]

Policy Document

80 City of Hanford
Policy EJ9 Pesticide Exposure Public Information
Coordinate with the Kings County Agricultural Commissioner’s Office to provide pesticide use education to residents and raise awareness about the potential health impacts from pesticide use and process to report pesticide violations. [Source: New policy]
Policy EJ10 Litter and Illegal Dumping Prevention
Support prevention and cleanup of litter and illegal dumping in the Community of Focus by pursuing partnerships and programmatic solutions, including collaboration with relevant regional enforcement efforts and organizations. [Source: New policy]
Policy EJ11 Environmental Pollution Resources
Refer new and established businesses to the appropriate regulating entity such as the Department of Toxic Substances Control, to inform businesses of regulations associated with environmental pollution. [Source: New policy]
Policy EJ12 Minimizing Pollution from Truck Traffic
Minimize heavy truck traffic by designating truck routes away from residential areas and sensitive land uses in and around the Community of Focus. [Source: New policy] Goal EJ3 Empower all community members to participate meaningfully in the City’s decision-making processes. [Source: New Goal]
Policy EJ13 Community Partnerships
Coordinate with local organizations that serve underserved populations (e.g., Kings Community Action Organization (KCAO) and Kings Partnership (KPFP) ) to conduct community outreach for planning projects and environmental justice concerns. [Source: New policy] Policy EJ14 Translation and Interpretation
Offer translation and interpretation services and materials at public meetings and community outreach events to ensure those not proficient in English can still meaningfully participate in the public decision-making process. [Source: New policy]
Policy EJ15 Meeting People Where They Are
Implement a “meeting people where they are” approach to community engagement efforts to gather input and feedback from a broader range of community members. This outreach approach may include, but is not limited to:
• Attending events already planned in the community to gather input and provide information. • Setting up information stations or pop -up booths near local businesses or organizations, especially within the Community of Focus.
• Providing online information and engagement opportunities for community members to access from home. [Source: New policy]

Chapter 9 – Environmental Justice

General Plan Update 81
Policy EJ16 Transparency
Strive to make it clear that community feedback is received and how it is being incorporated into policies and programs in Hanford. [Source: New policy]
Goal EJ4 Ensure residents of all ages and abilities have access to recreational opportunities and public resources and services. [Source: New Goal] Policy EJ17 Graffiti Abatement
Implement proactive graffiti prevention and cleanup programs to enhance community aesthetics and reduce visual blight. Programs shall include coordination with community-based organizations and volunteer groups to support timely removal and reporting systems. [Source: New policy] Policy EJ18 Support for Disabled Veterans
Coordinate with local, State, and Federal agencies, nonprofit organizations, and service providers to improve access to services, programs, and facilities for disabled veterans that promote health, mobility, and social inclusion. [Source: New policy]
Policy EJ19 Safe and Complete Streets
Create and maintain a safe, comfortable, and continuous pedestrian network for all users, especially disabled individuals, seniors, and children, by closing sidewalk gaps, improving crosswalks, and implementing traffic calming and streetscape enhancements. [Source: New policy] Policy EJ20 Streetscape Amenities
Identify State, Federal, and other funding sources to improve streetscapes, prioritizing Hanford’s Community of Focus, by incorporating streetscape amenities that enhance comfort and safety, such as street trees, streetlights, and landscape buffers. [Source: New policy] Policy EJ21 Youth Recreation and Entertainment Opportunities Encourage the development and maintenance of accessible, affordable, and well -distributed youth entertainment and recreational facilities, including skateparks, sports fields, and community centers, to support healthy lifestyles, physical activity, and social engagement for youth of all ages and backgrounds. [Source: New policy]
Policy EJ22 High Speed Internet Access
Promote equitable access to reliable, affordable high-speed internet for all residents, businesses, and community institutions by supporting broadband infrastructure expansion, prioritizing underserved areas, and encouraging the integration of internet access into new development and public buildings. [Source: New policy]

Policy Document

82 City of Hanford
Goal EJ5 Ensure all residents have access to safe and healthy living conditions. [Source:

New Goal]
Policy EJ23 Enforcement of City Regulations
Enforce City regulations to improve unsafe and unsanitary living conditions, focusing on illegal dumping, maintenance of older homes, graffiti, and building and yard maintenance. [Source: New policy] Policy EJ24 Housing Maintenance Assistance
Prepare an internal study of the potential of a program that assists low -income households with information, resources, and financing for home repairs and maintenance necessary to improve health, safety, and energy efficiency of homes (e.g., air filtration, windows, lead paint abatement) . This study shall identify funding opportunities the City can pursue to support the program. [Source: New policy]

4.B.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 3/3/2026 AGENDA SECTION: STUDY SESSION

SUBJECT:

Review and Comment on the 2026 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Annual Action Plan

RECOMMENDATION:

Informational Summary of the Allocation Process for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Annual Action Plan (APP) and Budget for Program Year 2026 (PY 2026) BACKGROUND:

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) annually allocates Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to the City of Hanford. Although the PY 2026 federal appropriations have not yet been released, the estimated allocation is $548,508, which includes:
• $523,508 – Estimated entitlement allocation (based on the 2025 allocation) • $25,000 – Estimated program income from loan repayments

City of Hanford CDBG Process:

Consolidated Plan
In compliance with federal regulations, HUD requires the City to prepare a five-year Consolidated Plan. The City Council approved the current plan on May 7, 2024, covering Program Years 2024– 2028. The Consolidated Plan identifies community needs, establishes funding priorities, and outlines strategic goals for CDBG funds.

Annual Action Plan
Each year, the City must submit an Annual Action Plan (APP) to HUD detailing the specific activities and funding allocations for that program year. The plan is submitted to HUD by May 15th annually.

Public outreach is an integral component of the planning process and includes community meetings, stakeholder engagement, and opportunities for public comment to ensure transparency and community participation.

Project Selection and Funding

CDBG-funded activities must meet at least one of three national objectives:

1. Benefit low- and moderate-income (LMI) persons (minimum 70% of funds must meet this objective)

2. Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight

3. Address urgent needs posing an immediate threat to community health or welfare

Since 2004, the City of Hanford has received approximately $550,000 annually in CDBG funding.

Eligible Activities
CDBG funds may be used for the following eligible activities:
• Public Services: Job training, childcare, crime prevention, Fair Housing counseling (Limited to 15% of the annual allocation)
• Housing Activities: Homeownership assistance, housing rehabilitation, lead-based paint abatement
• Economic Development: Microenterprise assistance, commercial rehabilitation, special economic development projects
• Public Facilities & Improvements: Infrastructure improvements such as water/sewer lines, streets, and public facilities
• Other Eligible Activities: Property acquisition, clearance, and rehabilitation of commercial or industrial buildings
• Planning and Administration: Program oversight and coordination (Limited to 20% of the total allocation)

CDBG Funding Categories & Spending Limits
Estimated PY 2026 Allocation Distribution:
• Public Services: $82,276 (15%)
• Program Administration: $109,702 (20%)
• Housing Rehabilitation: $156,530
• Public Improvements / Community Enhancement: $200,000

Summary
The CDBG Annual Action Plan process ensures that federal funds provided by HUD are strategically allocated to address community priorities identified in the City’s five-year Consolidated Plan. By complying with federal regulations, engaging the public, and adhering to national objectives and spending caps, the City of Hanford continues to leverage CDBG funds to support housing, infrastructure, economic development, and essential public services for low- and moderate-income residents.

NEXT STEPS
Following this Study Session and receipt of Council feedback, staff will:

1. Finalize the PY 2026 Annual Action Plan;

2. Conduct the required public review period;

3. Return to City Council on May 5th for final consideration and approval; and

4. Submit the plan to HUD by the May 15 deadline.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The CDBG program is federally funded. There is no impact to the City’s General Fund associated with this allocation.

ATTACHMENTS:

None

13.B.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 3/3/2026 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Approval of the Minutes of the February 3, 2026 Meeting

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: Approve the February 3, 2026, Meeting Minutes.

BACKGROUND:

FISCAL IMPACT:

ATTACHMENTS:

1. February 3, 2026 Meeting Minutes

13.C.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 3/3/2026 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Authorization to Submit HOME Investment Partnership Program Income Application

RECOMMENDATION:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 26-13-R approving the submittal of a HOME Investment Partnerships Program Income (PI) Application to continue implementation of the First-Time Homebuyer Program and to provide homeowner rehabilitation assistance;

2. Authorize the Mayor to execute all documents necessary to implement the HOME Investment Partnerships Program, including agreements and contracts; and

3. Authorize the City Manager and the Community Development Director to execute, on behalf of the City, all project drawdown requests and administrative documents required by HCD or the U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), ensuring that all Program Income is administered in compliance with 24 CFR Part 92 and all applicable State and federal HOME program requirements.6
BACKGROUND:

In 2022, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) temporarily paused the HOME Investment Partnerships Program while updating State Guidelines. During this pause, First-Time Homebuyer Program (FTHB) loan payoffs increased due to property sales and refinancing, generating Program Income (PI) of approximately One Million Eight Hundred Sixty-Eight Thousand One Hundred Eighty-Nine Dollars ($1,868,189).

The City’s Housing Division has updated program guidelines to comply with new State and federal requirements:
• First-Time Homebuyer Program: Guidelines submitted to HCD and pending final approval. • Homeowner-Occupied Rehabilitation Program: Guidelines will be updated and submitted to HCD for approval.

HCD has invited the City to apply for use of the available funds. Approval will enable continued

implementation of the City’s First-Time Homebuyer and Homeowner-Occupied Rehabilitation Programs, supporting the housing goals outlined in the 2024–2032 Housing Element.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The estimated $1,868,189 in Program Income will fund FTHB and OOR program activities. No additional General Fund resources are required. Access to these funds depends on HCD’s approval of the submitted guidelines and the City’s application to utilize the available HOME funds.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution No. 26-13-R

RESOLUTION NO. 26-13-R

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HANFORD AUTHORIZING THE

SUBMITTAL OF A HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM INCOME APPLICATION

AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF RELATED DOCUMENTS

WHEREAS:

A. The California Department of Housing and Community Development (the “Department”) is authorized to allocate HOME Investment Partnerships Program (“HOME”) funds made available from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). HOME funds are to be used for the purposes set forth in Title II of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act of 1990, in federal implementing regulations set forth in Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 92, and in Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations commencing with section 8200.

B. On, the Department issued a Notice of Funding Availability announcing the availability of funds under the HOME program (the “NOFA”).

C. In response to the NOFA, February 11, 2025, the City of Hanford wishes to apply to the Department for, and receive an allocation of HOME funds.

WHEREAS, the City of Hanford previously received HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) funds from the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to implement the City’s First-Time Homebuyer and Homeowner Occupied Programs; and WHEREAS, loan repayments received from participants of the City’s First-Time Homebuyer and Homeowner Occupied Programs have generated Program Income (PI) that may be reused to provide additional housing assistance; and WHEREAS, the California Department of Housing and Community Development has invited the City to submit an application for the use of available HOME Program Income funds, currently estimated at One Million Eight Hundred Sixty-Eight Thousand One Hundred Eighty-Nine Dollars ($1,868,189); for the following programs:

City’s First-Time Homebuyer and Homeowner Occupied located in Hanford, California WHEREAS, approval of this application will allow the City to continue its City’s First-Time Homebuyer and Homeowner Occupied Programs in accordance with the City’s adopted Housing Element and Consolidated Plan go
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hanford as follows:

1. The City Council hereby approves the submittal of a HOME Investment Partnerships Program Income (PI) Application to the California Department of Housing and Community Development.

2. The Mayor is authorized to execute all documents related to the HOME Program on behalf of the City of Hanford.

3. The City Manager and Community Development Director are authorized to execute all project drawdown requests and administrative documents required by HCD.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford dully called and held on March 3rd, 2026 by the following vote.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Mark Kairis, Mayor
ATTEST:

Natalie Corral, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF KINGS ) ss

CITY OF HANFORD )

I, Natalie Corral, City Clerk of the City of Hanford, do hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford held on the 3rd day of March 2026.

Date:

City Clerk

13.D.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 3/3/2026 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Adopt a Resolution Approving a Historic Resources Application for 325 N. Douty Street (APN 010- 276-001) – Superior Dairy

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation:

Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, adopt Resolution 26-14-R conditionally approving Historic Resources Permit 0020-26.

Recommended Motion:

I move to adopt Resolution 26-14-R conditionally approving Historic Resources Permit 0020-26.

BACKGROUND:

PROJECT: Historic Resources Permit 0020-26, a request to allow various modifications to the 9th Street and Douty Street frontages for 325 N. Douty Street, as well as the eastern frontage facing the City Hall parking lot, including installation of modified doors, windows, an awning, and a new mechanical platform/guardrail to house air handling equipment on the roof. The property is designated as a contributing building within the Historic Overlay Zone.

LOCATION: The project is located at 325 N. Douty Street (APN 010-276-001).

The property is a contributing building located in the Historic District, shown below outline in black:

Figure 1: Historic Overlay Zone and Properties

“Contributing building” means a structure within a historic district which structure retains scale, mass and other architectural characteristics to the degree that it contributes to the sense of time and place of the immediate area and the district. The building may have individual architectural significance or may be one of a grouping of background buildings that jointly contribute to the character of the immediate area and the district. Contributing buildings may reflect interim modifications if those modifications do not irreparably detract from the character of the building or if the modifications reflect an architectural style or particular era important to the development of the City. Contributing buildings shall also include structures that have a strong historical tie to activities, events, or individuals important in the development of the City.

In accordance with the Municipal Code Section 17.48, alterations to the exterior of a building located within the Historic Overlay Zone are required to be approved through a Historic Resources Permit, which must be approved by the City Council.

Section 17.48.040

No improvement or exterior architectural feature of any improvement shall be constructed or altered or enlarged which is located in the Historic Overlay District or identified as a historic site outside the District, unless a permit is issued pursuant to the terms of this chapter. The section shall not apply to any interior alteration which has no effect on the condition or appearance of any exterior architectural feature of an improvement. No structure listed on a State or National Register shall be moved or demolished, unless a permit is issued pursuant to the terms of this chapter.

Section 17.48.070

A. A historic resource permit shall be required for any alteration of the exterior features of a building within a designated historic district, or a designated historic building or site, or to construct a new building or improvements upon property within a designated historic district except as otherwise provided in this Chapter 17.48, the City Council shall determine whether a historic resources permit shall be issued. A permit shall not be required for ordinary maintenance and repairs as defined in this section.

B. Permit Procedures. An application for a historic resource permit shall be made on a form prescribed by the Community Development Department and shall be accompanied by the fees established by resolution of the City Council. The application shall include the information required by Section 17.60.020 for site plan review, complete elevation drawings of the proposed alterations, samples of proposed colors and materials, color photographs of all sides of any existing improvement, building or structure on the site, and such other information as may be required by the Community Development Department. If applicable, the application shall include the information required by Chapter 17.58 (permit for conditional uses) and Chapter 17.62 (planned unit development).

Applications for permits requiring City Council approval shall be placed on the next regular meeting of the City Council. The City Council may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the permit.

Building Description

According to historic records, maintained by the Community Development Department, it is estimated the building was constructed in the years 1929-1930. In 1989, Historic Resources Permit 89-07 was conditionally approved, which proposed the installation of two new door openings to match the existing entry dimensions, and the installation of small paned windows adjacent to the new entries to match those on the north façade. The doors were to be glass with an anodized bright aluminum finish, and the windows were to be metal framed to match those existing. Though approved, the applicant decided not to move forward with the modifications, as proposed.

Figure 2: HRA 89-07

In 2014, under Historic Resource Permit 2014-01, it was concluded that pink, black, and white tiles proposed for the exterior of the building were consistent with the 2010 plan that was previously viewed and approved by Main Street Hanford.

Figure 3: Superior Dairy Frontage along Douty Street

Proposal

The applicant proposes various modifications to the building’s north, west, and east frontages, including:

North Elevation Changes – Along 9th Street

1. Repairing or replacing the existing awning (like for like: not subject to HRA)

2. Painting of window trim in Sherwin Williams Iron Ore (SW 7069), which is an approved historic color and therefore not subject to HRA)

3. Replacing the existing sliding door at the shipping and service entry with a new, overhead roll-up door

4. Installing a new mechanical platform and guardrail beyond existing roof line. The mechanical platform and guardrail will extend to 27 feet and 3.5 inches, above the existing 22 foot roof line. The guardrail will be painted Sherwin Williams – Agreeable Gray (SW 7029) (The color is an approved historical color)

5. Replacing two existing windows within their existing openings (HRA not required – like for like); the exterior wall to be painted to match the existing, as needed

6. Installing two new storefront doors in a former opening (formerly window and door openings), patching and repairing of the exterior wall to match the existing, as needed (white stucco);

7. Removing existing windows and infilling the wall to finish with material to match (white stucco)

8. Installing a new storefront door in existing window opening

9. Installing two new overhead roll-up doors proposed in existing window openings, patching and repairing of the exterior wall to match, as needed (white stucco)

10. Removing an existing awning

11. Installing new exterior wall mounted lighting in six locations

12. Adding new stucco detailing with natural stone in-lay in six locations

13. Adding of a new sign (approximately 32 sq. ft.) and signage lighting proposed

14. Adding a new canvas awning proposed on 9th Street, proposed to match material of existing awnings

West Elevation Changes – Along Douty Street

1. Repairing or replacing the existing awning (like for like: not subject to HRA)

2. Painting of window and door trim in Sherwin Williams – Iron Ore (SW 7069) (approved historic color – not subject to HRA)

3. Installing a new mechanical platform and guardrail beyond existing roof line. The mechanical platform and guardrail will extend to 27 feet and 3.5 inches, above the existing 22 foot roof line. The guardrail will be painted Sherwin Williams – Agreeable Gray (SW 7029) (The color is an approved historical color)

4. Installing two new exterior wall mounted lighting in two locations

East Elevation Changes – Along Parking Lot behind City Hall

1. Painting of window and door trim in Sherwin Williams – Iron Ore (SW 7069) (approved historic color – not subject to HRA)

2. Installing a new mechanical platform and guardrail beyond existing roof line. The mechanical platform and guardrail will extend to 27 feet and 3.5 inches, above the existing 22 foot roof line. The guardrail will be painted Sherwin Williams – Agreeable Gray (SW 7029) (The color is an approved historical color)

The proposal is attached – Attachment 1.

An evaluation of the changes proposed against the existing conditions appears as Attachment 2.

Evaluation - Generally

17.48.055 Ordinary maintenance and repairs.

A. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prevent the ordinary maintenance or repair of any exterior architectural feature in or on any property subject to this chapter if the maintenance or repair does not involve a

change in the design, material, color or external appearance thereof.

B. This chapter shall not prevent the construction, reconstruction, alteration, restoration, demolition or removal of any such feature when the Building Official certified to the City Council that such action is required for the public safety due to an unsafe or dangerous condition which cannot be rectified through the use of the Historical Building Code of the State of California.

C. No permit shall be required for ordinary maintenance and repairs as defined in this section.

Analysis: Since the rooftop mechanical pad was not previously existing, staff cannot consider this as ordinance maintenance/repair of an exterior architectural feature; therefore, the Historic Resource Permit process is necessitated. However, the construction of the mechanical platform and guardrail is required for compliance with current California Energy Code.

17.48.150 Design criteria
B. Design Guidelines. The following design guidelines are to be used to formulate plans for the rehabilitation, preservation, and continued use of old buildings consistent with the intent of this chapter. The guidelines apply to buildings of all occupancy and construction types, sizes and materials and to all permanent and temporary construction on the exterior of historic buildings as well as new attached or adjacent construction.

6. Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired, rather than replaced, wherever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture and other visual qualities. The repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historic, physical or pictorial evidence, rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from other buildings or structures.

Analysis: The applicant proposes to replace one existing door, modify existing windows into overhead roll-up doors and an entry door, and modify one existing door to be a window. While the applicant is proposing replacement rather than repair, the materials and colors proposed match existing colors and materials or colors and materials previously approved for this location.

C. Rehabilitation Standards. The provisions of this subsection are intended to provide reasonable design for the rehabilitation of historic buildings so that the basic historic and architectural presentation of the buildings is retained and enhanced.

2. Windows and Doors.

a. Where they still exist, the original sills, lintels, frames, sash, muntins, and glass of windows and transoms should be preserved. The original doorway elements, including sills, lintels, frames and the doors, should also be retained.

When they must be replaced, the replacements should duplicate the originals in design and materials.

b. Glass in windows, doors and transoms should be clear, except where documentary evidence indicates the original use of colored glass. Plastic materials should not be used in place of glass. Any existing small paned transoms should not be obscured on the exterior.

c. The original proportions of wall openings should be retained. The blocking of any existing opening to accommodate standard sash and glass sizes, to hide ceilings lowered beneath the tops of existing windows, or for any other reason should not be allowed.

d. Decorative wood or metal lintels, brackets and any other window or doorway trim should be preserved and should be restored where possible.

e. In rehabilitation, the original number of panes in glassed areas should be used.

Analysis: Exterior materials are to remain where feasible and replaced with like-in kind materials where repairs and replacements are necessary. The original proportions of wall openings will be retained where replacements are proposed, and replicate proportions of openings previously approved by HRA 89-07 where new openings are proposed. Additionally, roll-up or overhead doors have been previously approved in the Historic District, under Historic Resource Permit No. 2018-02, pertaining to Hop Forged Brewery. It shall be noted, the Hop Forged Brewery, located at 106 W. Seventh Street is considered a noncontributing building in the Historic Overlay Zone.

E. General Building Standards. The standards set forth in this subsection should be applied to all alterations or new construction in the historic district.

1. Color.

a. Exterior colors should harmonize with other colors on the same building and on the streetscape. Exterior colors should complement the colors of neighboring buildings and should be selected to be mutually supportive and beneficial to the overall historic character of the streetscape.

b. Where wood or metal surfaces of windows, doors, porches and details, other than cornices, are to be painted, the following colors shall be used: During the early twentieth century, muted colors and earth colors were favored.

They included gray, dark brown, dark green, blue gray, beige, brick red, and terra cotta. A slightly grayish-white paint, was frequently used for major surface areas and for details. This grayish-white is an appropriate choice for window sash and frames and for other details. In some instances, black or dark gray may be appropriate for the fixed window or door frame. If the original color of a cornice cannot be determined, grayish-white, buff or sandstone color are preferred choices.

c. Where brick has been painted, repainting in a color which approximates that of the natural brick is appropriate.

Mortar joints might also be suggested in a color approximating the natural color of the mortar (not a pure white).

Depending on the paint history of a building, grayish-white paint may be an acceptable alternative for the façade.

Where brick was unpainted and remains unpainted, the use of paint on the exterior shall be discouraged, since unpainted brick is a strong design tradition in the historic district.

d. Paint colors which were not produced or used during the early twentieth century should be discouraged in the historic district. Bright, new colors are to be avoided, even when used sparingly.

Analysis: Roofing material, brick, stucco, and awning to remain as existing or be repaired with like-in kind materials as necessary. Color proposed for mechanical platform and guardrail is Sherman Williams, Agreeable Gray, SW 7092. Color proposed for doors and windowpanes is Sherman Williams Iron Ore, SW 7069. Color and material

proposed for stucco inlay is Walker Zanger- pink onyx, extra polished. Colors proposed shall be replaced with closest approved color from Benjamin Moore Historic Collection for platform, guardrail, doors, and windowpanes.

The case can be made that pink-onyx closely resembles color and material of existing and previously approved exterior pink tiles.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends approval of the Historic Resource Permit, as proposed, as the original materials, colors, and points of entry are being maintained as existing where feasible, or closely resemble previously approved plans.

FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL

In accordance with Section 17.48 of the Hanford Municipal Code, staff recommends the applicant’s request be conditionally approved.

Staff recommends conditional approval of Historic Resources Permit HRA0020-26 and that the conditional approval of the historic resources permit will allow private investment in the Downtown area, enhance property values, allow the increase of economic and financial benefits to the City and its property owners and inhabitants, and make the following findings:

1. That the proposed rehabilitation of the façade will not impact the Historic Overlay Zone since the recommended façade improvements will be consistent with the Historic Overlay Zone Design Guidelines.

2. That the proposed project will provide a complementary setting and environment in the Historic District.

3. That the proposed project will promote and encourage continued private ownership and utilization of structures so that the objectives set forth in this section can be attained under this policy.

4. That the request will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Hanford.

RECOMMENDATION – CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

The City Council may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the permit.

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 26-87-R, conditionally approving Historic Resources Permit No. 0020-26, with the following conditions:

1. That approval of this project does not exempt compliance with all applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance, Public Works Improvement Standards, fees, or other City Ordinances.

2. That the alterations to the site be completed in accordance with the proposed changes. Future changes may be approved by the Community Development Director or forwarded to the City Council for review.

3. That the door and window frames be painted Benjamin Moore Historic Color-190, Black, and that the mechanical platform and guardrail be painted Benjamin Moore Historic Color-105, Rockport Gray, so as to match existing colors and serving to replace proposed Sherman Willaims paint colors.

Applicant:

Neil Miller
Exceed Design, Inc.
1543 See Canyon Rd.

San Luis Obispo,

Owner:

Jacob Zonneveld
325 N. Douty St.

Hanford, CA 93230
FISCAL IMPACT:

None

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-14-R

RESOLUTION 26-14-R

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HANFORD APPROVING HISTORIC RESOURCES PERMIT HRA0020-26, A REQUEST BY SUPERIOR DAIRY TO ALLOW VARIOUS MODIFICATIONS FOR 325 N.

DOUTY STREET, INCLUDING INSTALLATION OF MODIFIED DOORS,

WINDOWS, AN AWNING, AND A NEW MECHANICAL

PLATFORM/GUARDRAIL TO HOUSE AIR HANDLING EQUIPMENT ON THE ROOF. WITHIN THE HISTORIC OVERLAY ZONE. THE PROJECT IS
LOCATED AT 325 N. DOUTY STREET (APN 010-276-001).

At a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford duly called and held on March 3, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Civic Auditorium, it was moved by Council Member ____________, and seconded by Council Member ____________, and duly carried, that the following resolution be adopted:

WHEREAS, an application, filed by Laurence Solis for Historic Resources Permit HRA0020-26, as shown in Exhibit A, was presented to the City Council; and

WHEREAS, the proposed project is located at 325 N Douty (APN 010-276-001); and

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hanford, at a regular meeting on March 3, 2026, reviewed the request for Historic Resources Permit HRA0017-25; and

WHEREAS, Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines categorically exempts “Existing Facilities” from Environmental Review; and

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hanford reviewed the application for the Historic Resources Permit HRA0020-26 and found that the application is consistent with Section

17.48 of the Hanford Municipal Code, that the approval of the historic resources permit will allow private investment in the Downtown area, allow the increase of economic and financial benefits to the City and its property owners and inhabitants, and make the following findings:

1. That the proposed rehabilitation of the façade will not impact the Historic Overlay Zone since the building is designated as a noncontributing structure.

2. That the proposed project will provide a complementary setting and environment in the Historic District.

3. That the proposal will promote and encourage continued private ownership and utilization of structures so that the objectives set forth in Section 17.48 can be attained.

4. That the request will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Hanford.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hanford hereby approves Historic Resources Permit HRA0020-26, subject to the following conditions:

1. That approval of this project does not exempt compliance with all applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance, Public Works Improvement Standards, fees, or other City Ordinances.

2. That the alterations to the site be completed in accordance with the proposed changes. Future changes may be approved by the Community Development Director or forwarded to the City Council for review.

3. That the door and window frames be painted Benjamin Moore Historic Color-190, Black, and that the mechanical platform and guardrail be painted Benjamin Moore Historic Color-105, Rockport Gray, so as to match existing colors and serving to replace proposed Sherman Willaims paint colors.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Hanford hereby approves Historic Resources Permit HRA0020-26. Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford duly called and held on March 3, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: _______________________________________________________________________ NOES: _______________________________________________________________________ ABSTAIN: ____________________________________________________________________ ABSENT: _____________________________________________________________________

APPROVED: __________________________

MARK KAIRIS
MAYOR of the City of Hanford
ATTEST:

NATALIE CORRAL

CITY CLERK

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF KINGS ) ss

CITY OF HANFORD )

I, NATALIE CORRAL, City Clerk of the City of Hanford, do hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford held on the 3rd day of March, 2026.

Date: _________________

NATALIE CORRAL

CITY CLERK

EXHIBIT A

Summary of Elevation Changes
North Elevation Changes – Along 9th Street

List of Numbered Items:
#1 Detail: Repair or replacement of the awning
Existing:

Proposed:

Analysis: Repair or replacement with like for like: not subject to historic resource permit #2 Detail: Window trim to be painted SHERWIN WILLIAMS - IRON ORE, SW 7069

Existing:

Proposed:

Analysis: Approved historic color – not subject to historic resource permit

#4 Detail: Existing sliding door at the shipping and service entry requested to be replaced with a new, overhead roll-up door

Existing:

Proposed:

Analysis: Historic Resource Required

17.48.150 Design Criteria. C

2. Windows and Doors.

a. Where they still exist, the original sills, lintels, frames, sash, muntins, and glass of windows and transoms should be preserved. The original doorway elements, including sills, lintels, frames and the doors, should also be retained. When they must be replaced, the replacements should duplicate the originals in design and materials.

b. Glass in windows, doors and transoms should be clear, except where documentary evidence indicates the original use of colored glass. Plastic materials should not be used in place of glass. Any existing small paned transoms should not be obscured on the exterior.

c. The original proportions of wall openings should be retained. The blocking of any existing opening to accommodate standard sash and glass sizes, to hide ceilings lowered beneath the tops of existing windows, or for any other reason should not be allowed.

d. Decorative wood or metal lintels, brackets and any other window or doorway trim should be preserved and should be restored where possible.

e. In rehabilitation, the original number of panes in glassed areas should be used.

Analysis: Consistent with design guidelines. The original proportions of wall openings will be retained where replacements are proposed, and replicate proportions of openings previously approved by HRA 89-07 where new openings are proposed. Additionally, roll-up or overhead doors have been previously approved in the Historic District, under Historic Resource Permit No. 2018-02, pertaining to Hop Forged Brewery. It shall be noted, the Hop Forged Brewery, located at 106 W. Seventh Street is considered a noncontributing building in the Historic Overlay Zone.

#7 Detail: New mechanical platform and guardrail beyond existing roof line. The mechanical platform and guardrail will extend to 27 feet and 3.5 inches, above the existing 22 foot roof line. The guardrail will be painted Sherwin Williams – Agreeable Gray (SW 7029) (The color is an approved historical color)

Existing: (no guardrail present)

Proposed:

Analysis: 17.48.150 Design Criteria
D. New Construction Standards. The construction standards proposed in this subsection are based on a combination of existing and historical design elements common to the historic district building materials common and identify the downtown Hanford commercial buildings. The standards will help to assure that new design, while contemporary, will be compatible with the existing building character. The building design shall be consistent with the historical design elements found on adjacent buildings and the total character of the streetscape.

11. False fronts or parapet walls should conceal roofs from the public view. Mansard, free form, and geometric roof shapes shall be prohibited.

E. General Building Standards. The standards set forth in this subsection should be applied to all alterations or new construction in the historic district.

3. Roof-Mounted Equipment. Roof-mounted equipment should be located so that it is not generally visible from the adjoining streets or alleys and does not detract from the lines of the building.

Analysis: The guardrail is considered a parapet wall, an exterior wall which extends vertically above the roof line, and is intended to conceal required roof-mounted mechanical equipment from public view. The addition is consistent with the new construction standards and general building standards. #8. Detail: Replacement of window in the existing opening to match the existing window in the same wall (patch and repair); exterior wall to be painted to match the existing, as needed.

Existing:

Proposed:

Analysis:

C. Rehabilitation Standards. The provisions of this subsection are intended to provide reasonable design for the rehabilitation of historic buildings so that the basic historic and architectural presentation of the buildings is retained and enhanced.

2. Windows and Doors.
a. Where they still exist, the original sills, lintels, frames, sash, muntins, and glass of windows and transoms should be preserved. The original doorway elements, including sills, lintels, frames and the doors, should also be retained. When they must be replaced, the replacements should duplicate the originals in design and materials. b. Glass in windows, doors and transoms should be clear, except where documentary evidence indicates the original use of colored glass. Plastic materials should not be used in place of glass. Any existing small paned transoms should not be obscured on the exterior. c. The original proportions of wall openings should be retained. The blocking of any existing opening to accommodate standard sash and glass sizes, to hide ceilings lowered beneath the tops of existing windows, or for any other reason should not be allowed. d. Decorative wood or metal lintels, brackets and any other window or doorway trim should be preserved and should be restored where possible.
e. In rehabilitation, the original number of panes in glassed areas should be used.

Analysis: The applicant proposes the replacement of the window in the existing opening to match the existing window in the same wall consistent with the rehabilitation standards. #9 Detail: Two new storefront doors in the existing openings, patch and repair the exterior wall to match the existing, as needed (white stucco); remove existing windows (above), infill wall and finish with material to match (white stucco) (shown in 7 below) Replacement 1:

Existing:

Proposed:

Replacement 2:

Existing:

Proposed:

Proposed location of new storefront door in existing window opening Analysis: Historic Resource Required

17.48.151 Design Criteria. C

2. Windows and Doors.

a. Where they still exist, the original sills, lintels, frames, sash, muntins, and glass of windows and transoms should be preserved. The original doorway elements, including sills, lintels, frames and the doors, should also be retained. When they must be replaced, the replacements should duplicate the originals in design and materials.

b. Glass in windows, doors and transoms should be clear, except where documentary evidence indicates the original use of colored glass. Plastic materials should not be used in place of glass. Any existing small paned transoms should not be obscured on the exterior.

c. The original proportions of wall openings should be retained. The blocking of any existing opening to accommodate standard sash and glass sizes, to hide ceilings lowered beneath the tops of existing windows, or for any other reason should not be allowed.

d. Decorative wood or metal lintels, brackets and any other window or doorway trim should be preserved and should be restored where possible.

e. In rehabilitation, the original number of panes in glassed areas should be used.

Analysis: Consistent with design guidelines. The original proportions of wall openings will be retained where replacements are proposed, and replicate proportions of openings previously approved by HRA 89-07 where new openings are proposed. The proposal is consistent with the design criteria set forth.

#10. Detail: New overhead roll-up door proposed in existing window openings, patch and repair the exterior wall to match, as needed (white stucco) (12) remove existing awning DOOR SPECIFTCATION ON THIS SHEER FOR RENLITA S-2000 HINGEWAY

Existing: Existing awning on 9th Street to be removed

Analysis: Historic Resource Required

17.48.152 Design Criteria. C

2. Windows and Doors.

f. Where they still exist, the original sills, lintels, frames, sash, muntins, and glass of windows and transoms should be preserved. The original doorway elements, including sills, lintels, frames and the doors, should also be retained. When they must be replaced, the replacements should duplicate the originals in design and materials.

g. Glass in windows, doors and transoms should be clear, except where documentary evidence indicates the original use of colored glass. Plastic materials should not be used in place of glass. Any existing small paned transoms should not be obscured on the exterior.

h. The original proportions of wall openings should be retained. The blocking of any existing opening to accommodate standard sash and glass sizes, to hide ceilings lowered beneath the tops of existing windows, or for any other reason should not be allowed.

i. Decorative wood or metal lintels, brackets and any other window or doorway trim should be preserved and should be restored where possible.

j. In rehabilitation, the original number of panes in glassed areas should be used.

Analysis: Consistent with design guidelines. The original proportions of wall openings will be retained where replacements are proposed, and replicate proportions of openings previously approved by HRA 89-07 where new openings are proposed. Additionally, roll-up or overhead doors have been previously approved in the Historic District, under Historic Resource Permit No. 2018-02, pertaining to Hop Forged Brewery. It shall be noted, the Hop Forged Brewery, located at 106 W. Seventh Street is considered a noncontributing building in the Historic Overlay Zone.

#14. Detail: New exterior wall mounted lighting in six locations

Existing:

Proposed:

Analysis: Historic Resource Permit Required
C. Rehabilitation Standards. The provisions of this subsection are intended to provide reasonable design for the rehabilitation of historic buildings so that the basic historic and architectural presentation of the buildings is retained and enhanced.

1. Storefronts.
d. The architectural integrity of a buildings storefront in the historic district should be preserved. Accessories, such as light fixtures, which do not imitate the designs of these eras should be prohibited. Designs appropriate to the years during which the buildings in the historic district were constructed should be encouraged.

Analysis: The lights proposed are appropriate to the years the building was constructed (1929). # 15. (HRA Required) New stucco detailing with natural stone in-lay in six locations

Existing:

Proposed:

Analysis: Historic Resource Permit Required
E. General Building Standards. The standards set forth in this subsection should be applied to all alterations or new construction in the historic district.

1. Color.

a. Exterior colors should harmonize with other colors on the same building and on the streetscape. Exterior colors should complement the colors of neighboring buildings and should be selected to be mutually supportive and beneficial to the overall historic character of the streetscape.

b. Where wood or metal surfaces of windows, doors, porches and details, other than cornices, are to be painted, the following colors shall be used: During the early twentieth century, muted colors and earth colors were favored. They included gray, dark brown, dark green, blue gray, beige, brick red, and terra cotta. A slightly grayish-white paint, was frequently used for major surface areas and for details. This grayish-white is an appropriate choice for window sash and frames and for other details. In some instances, black or dark gray may be appropriate for the fixed window or door frame. If the original color of a cornice cannot be determined, grayish-white, buff or sandstone color are preferred choices.

c. Where brick has been painted, repainting in a color which approximates that of the natural brick is appropriate. Mortar joints might also be suggested in a color approximating the natural color of the mortar (not a pure white). Depending on the paint history of a building, grayish-white paint may be an acceptable alternative for the façade. Where brick was unpainted and remains unpainted, the use of paint on the exterior shall be discouraged, since unpainted brick is a strong design tradition in the historic district.

d. Paint colors which were not produced or used during the early twentieth century should be discouraged in the historic district. Bright, new colors are to be avoided, even when used sparingly.

Analysis: Color and material proposed for stucco inlay is Walker Zanger- pink onyx, extra polished.

The case can be made that pink-onyx closely resembles color and material of existing and previously approved exterior pink tiles.

#16 Detail: New signage (approximately 32 sq. ft.) and signage lighting proposed (Sign Permit also required)

Existing:

Proposed:

Analysis:

D. New Construction Standards. The construction standards proposed in this subsection are based on a combination of existing and historical design elements common to the historic district building materials common and identify the downtown Hanford commercial buildings. The standards will help to assure that new design, while contemporary, will be compatible with the existing building character. The building design shall be consistent with the historical design elements found on adjacent buildings and the total character of the streetscape.

12. The scale of new construction should be harmonious with that of adjacent buildings.

Materials, signs and other elements of new construction should be consistent with the scale of similar elements found in adjacent historic buildings.

Analysis: The signage proposed is consistent with the scale and materials of the existing signage on the west side of the building.

E. General Building Standards. The standards set forth in this subsection should be applied to all alterations or new construction in the historic district.

2. Signs.

a. General Requirements. Signs shall be designed to contribute to the quality of the historic commercial environment. Within the historic district, each business shall be limited to one primary sign, except those businesses on corners which may have a sign on each street. Each business may also appropriately establish one sign directly lettered onto the window glass or the glass in the doors. Signs in the historic district shall be pedestrian oriented in size and shape. Graphics shall be simple and bold. Signs shall be flush with the wall since they usually complement architectural elements more effectively than projecting sign. Wall mounted can or cabinet type internally illuminated wall signs are not permitted. Symbolic, three-dimensional signs (such as a barber pole or a pawn shop symbol) shall be encouraged. Paper signs attached to the interiors or exteriors of store windows shall be discouraged, except where temporary presentation for public notice requires such treatment. The height of new signs shall not extend above the window sills of the second floor. Signs on one-story buildings shall not project above the cornice line, and all roof-mounted signs shall be precluded.

b. Area of Permanent Signs.

i. Each ground floor tenant may have a maximum of one square foot of signage for each linear foot of business establishment on his primary frontage (that portion of the building occupied by the business which faces a street and contains the main entrance), with a 25 square foot minimum sign area, regardless of the width of such primary frontage.

ii. Each ground floor tenant may have a maximum of one-half square foot of signage for each linear foot of secondary frontage (that portion of the building occupied by the business and facing an alley, street, adjacent building, parking lot, or the like).

iii. Each ground floor tenant may have one sign located at each entrance attached below the marquee or canopy which shall not exceed six square feet per sign face and with a minimum ground clearance of seven feet above the sidewalk grade. Such sign shall not count against the maximum sign area allowed for a business frontage.

Analysis: The signage proposed contributes to the quality of the historic commercial environment.

The signs is pedestrian oriented in size and shape. The design is simple and bold. The sign is proposed to be flush with the wall. The sign does not project above the cornice line. The sign is located on the secondary frontage and is approximately 32 square feet, which is below the 75-foot allowance, based on 150 feet of liner frontage along 9th Street. #17 Detail: New canvas awning proposed on 9 th Street, proposed to match material of existing awnings
Existing:

Proposed:

Analysis: Historic Resource Required
C. Rehabilitation Standards. The provisions of this subsection are intended to provide reasonable design for the rehabilitation of historic buildings so that the basic historic and architectural presentation of the buildings is retained and enhanced. e. Canvas awnings are traditional to the historic district and are an acceptable element of store fronts. The size and scale of awnings should be appropriate to the building to which they are attached, based on photographic and documentary evidence. Color choice should be made with discretion. Metal awnings, glass awnings and glass canopies are not in keeping with the prevailing character of the historic district and may be prohibited. To avoid obscuring building elements on the upper stories, canopies and awnings should not be permitted above the ground floor unless documented by photographic evidence.

Analysis: Canvas awnings are traditional and encouraged within the Historic District. The canvas’ color will be black and white stripe, which based on photographic and documentary evidence is appropriate to the building.

West Elevation Changes – Along Douty Street

#1 Detail: Repair or replacement of the awning
Existing:

Proposed:

Analysis: Repair and Replace – not subject to a Historic Resource Permit. #2 and 3. Window trim and door trim to be painted to match proposed doors to be painted in Sherwin Williams – Iron Ore (SW 7069)

Existing:

Proposed:

Analysis: approved historic color – not subject to HRA) #7 Detail: New mechanical platform and guardrail beyond existing roof line. The mechanical platform and guardrail will extend to 27 feet and 3.5 inches, above the existing 22 foot roof line. The guardrail will be painted Sherwin Williams – Agreeable Gray (SW 7029) (The color is an approved historical color)

Existing:

Proposed:

Analysis: Historic Resource Permit Required

17.48.150 Design Criteria

D. New Construction Standards. The construction standards proposed in this subsection are based on a combination of existing and historical design elements common to the historic district building materials common and identify the downtown Hanford commercial buildings. The standards will help to assure that new design, while contemporary, will be compatible with the existing building character. The building design shall be consistent with the historical design elements found on adjacent buildings and the total character of the streetscape.

11. False fronts or parapet walls should conceal roofs from the public view. Mansard, free form, and geometric roof shapes shall be prohibited.

E. General Building Standards. The standards set forth in this subsection should be applied to all alterations or new construction in the historic district.

3. Roof-Mounted Equipment. Roof-mounted equipment should be located so that it is not generally visible from the adjoining streets or alleys and does not detract from the lines of the building.

Analysis: The guardrail is considered a parapet wall, an exterior wall which extends vertically above the roof line, and is intended to conceal required roof-mounted mechanical equipment from public view. The addition is consistent with the new construction standards and general building standards.

#14. Detail: New exterior wall mounted lighting in two locations.

Existing:

Proposed:

Analysis: Historic Resource Permit Required
C. Rehabilitation Standards. The provisions of this subsection are intended to provide reasonable design for the rehabilitation of historic buildings so that the basic historic and architectural presentation of the buildings is retained and enhanced.

1. Storefronts.
d. The architectural integrity of a buildings storefront in the historic district should be preserved. Accessories, such as light fixtures, which do not imitate the designs of these eras should be prohibited. Designs appropriate to the years during which the buildings in the historic district were constructed should be encouraged.

Analysis: The lights proposed are appropriate to the years the building was constructed (1929).

East Elevation Changes – Along Parking Lot behind City Hall

#2 Detail: Window trim to be painted in Sherwin Williams – Iron Ore (SW 7069)

Existing:

Proposed:

Analysis: approved historic color – not subject to HRA)

#7 Detail: New mechanical platform and guardrail beyond existing roof line. The mechanical platform and guardrail will extend to 27 feet and 3.5 inches, above the existing 22 foot roof line. The guardrail will be painted Sherwin Williams – Agreeable Gray (SW 7029) (The color is an approved historical color)

Existing:

Proposed:

Analysis: Historic Resource Permit Required

17.48.150 Design Criteria
D. New Construction Standards. The construction standards proposed in this subsection are based on a combination of existing and historical design elements common to the historic district building materials common and identify the downtown Hanford commercial buildings. The standards will help to assure that new design, while contemporary, will be compatible with the existing building character. The building design shall be consistent with the historical design elements found on adjacent buildings and the total character of the streetscape.

11. False fronts or parapet walls should conceal roofs from the public view. Mansard, free form, and geometric roof shapes shall be prohibited.

E. General Building Standards. The standards set forth in this subsection should be applied to all alterations or new construction in the historic district.

3. Roof-Mounted Equipment. Roof-mounted equipment should be located so that it is not generally visible from the adjoining streets or alleys and does not detract from the lines of the building.

Analysis: The guardrail is considered a parapet wall, an exterior wall which extends vertically above the roof line, and is intended to conceal required roof-mounted mechanical equipment from public view. The addition is consistent with the new construction standards and general building standards.

13.E.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 3/3/2026 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Authorization to apply for the FY 26/27 Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program (CTFGP) through the California Highway Patrol (CHP) in the amount of $164,380.73 to be used for DUI enforcement overtime costs, purchase of a DUI checkpoint command trailer, a Ford F150 vehicle, and DUI checkpoint equipment.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, authorize the Police Department to apply for the FY26/27 Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program (CTFGP) through the California Highway Patrol (CHP) in the amount of $164,380.73 to be used for DUI enforcement overtime costs, purchase of a DUI checkpoint command trailer, a Ford F150, and DUI checkpoint equipment.

Recommended Motion: I move to authorize the Police Department to apply for the FY25/26 Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program (CTFGP) through the California Highway Patrol (CHP) in the amount of $164,380.73 to be used for DUI enforcement overtime costs, purchase of a DUI checkpoint command trailer, a Ford F150, and DUI checkpoint equipment.

BACKGROUND:

With the passage of Proposition 64, the Control, Regulate, and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA), the California Highway Patrol (CHP) administers grant funding to local governments through their Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program (CTFGP). The CTFGP aims to reduce impaired driving, increase awareness about the dangers of impaired driving, and make roadways safer for the public.

The Hanford Police Department (HPD) has participated in the CTFGP since fiscal year 2022.

Previous grant awards funded overtime costs for DUI saturation patrols, DUI checkpoints conducted by HPD officers as well as partial funding for new patrol vehicles.

Staff would like to apply for the upcoming FY26/27 CTFGP to use the potential awarded amount for overtime costs for DUI enforcement activities, purchase of a command trailer for DUI Checkpoint operations, a Ford F150 to haul the command trailer, and DUI checkpoint equipment, such as portable lights and reflective vests. The requested award amount is $164,380.73. There is no City match required for this grant and all operations and purchases will be reimbursed by the CHP should the award be approved.

The application period for the FY26/27 CTFGP closed on February 23, 2026. Due to this deadline, staff submitted the application prior to receiving City Council approval. However, should Council

choose not to approve the application, HPD can withdraw from consideration.

Should HPD be awarded the grant, staff will bring an additional request to City Council to authorize the acceptance of the grant along with approving a resolution and budget appropriation for the grant award amount.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact as this item is for approval to apply for the CTFGP grant. Staff will request a budget appropriation if the grant is awarded.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program Request for Application

CANNABIS TAX FUND GRANT PROGRAM

REQUEST FOR APPLICATION (RFA)

Grant Opportunity
Law Enforcement

Eligible Grant Applicants
Small and Mid-Size Law Enforcement Organizations/Agencies Small-Size: 100 Employees or Less
Mid-Size: 500 Employees or Less

Project Performance Period
July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2027

This Request for Application (RFA) provides specific Grant Opportunity information for the Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program (CTFGP) 2026-2027 Grant Cycle, including important deadlines and details. To ensure all eligibility requirements are met for successful participation in the CTFGP, please review the California Code of Regulations (Title 13, Division 2, Chapter 13) and other CTFGP information posted on the California Highway Patrol’s (CHP) website:
https://www.chp.ca.gov/programs-services/programs/cannabis-tax-fund-grant-program.

Important Dates
Activity Date
Grant Workshop January 6, 2026
Grant Application Submission Period January 7, 2026 – February 23, 2026 Grant Application Submission Deadline February 23, 2026, 5:00pm Pacific Time Grant Application Review February – May 2026
Award Announcements May – June 2026
Start of Project Performance Period July 1, 2026
Project Performance Period July 1, 2026 – June 30, 2027

Funding Requirements
A Grant Applicant may only submit one Grant Application, per Grant Opportunity, and shall only request the amount of grant funds necessary to complete the Project within the Project Performance Period and within the local community served by the applying agency. Activities outside the jurisdiction but within the surrounding area(s) of the applying agency may be considered on a case-by-case basis with Cannabis Grants Unit (CGU) approval.

Grant funds shall be used to implement new activities or augment existing funds, which expand current activities. Grant funds shall not replace (supplant) any federal, state and/or local funds that are appropriated or earmarked for the same purpose and are routine and/or existing state and local expenditures. Supplanting is the deliberate reduction in the amount of federal, state, or local funding appropriated to an existing program or activity because grant funds are awarded for the same purpose. It is the responsibility of the Grant Applicant to ensure supplanting does not occur.

Match Requirements
This Grant Opportunity does not require matching funds.

Project Costs
Estimated Project costs shall support CTFGP grant-funded Project activities that help address impaired driving and are directly related to the scope of work identified in the Grant Application. To be permissible, Project costs must be reasonable, necessary, and expended according to the CTFGP policies, procedures, and regulations.

Projects are required to have a realistic and prudent budget that avoids unnecessary expenditures unrelated to the Project activities. Final determination of eligibility and award shall be made by the CGU and approved within the Grant Agreement.

Please refer to Annex A for ineligible expenses.

Project Performance Period
One Year – July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2027

Eligible Grant Applicants
Small-Size Law Enforcement Organizations/Agencies: 100 employees or less Mid-Size Law Enforcement Organizations/Agencies: 500 employees or less

Small and Mid-Size Law Enforcement Organizations/Agencies, with the primary function of enforcing traffic laws, which includes responding to calls, making arrests, and issuing citations, pursuant to the California Penal Code, California Vehicle Code, and California Health and Safety Code.

Project Funding
Available Project funding is approximately $13 million, with a $500,000 cap, per Grant Application. The Grant Applicant must provide strong justification, measurable goals, and an immediate need for all requested budget items, as part of the Project.

Project Requirements
Requested services, equipment, and supplies shall be in direct support of grant-funded Project activities. Law Enforcement Projects shall include at least one CTFGP funded Project activity and focus on one or more of the following areas:
• Increase driving under the influence (DUI)/driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) enforcement efforts (ex: DUI Saturation Patrols, DUI Checkpoints) • Drug Evaluation and Classification (DEC) Program courses (ex: SFST Training, ARIDE Training, DRE Training), and other trainings to help increase the knowledge of law enforcement personnel in detecting and removing impaired drivers from the roadway • General prevention education and community outreach designed to educate the public about the dangers of impaired driving (ex: presentations to high school and/or college students, with a direct focus on Drive High = DUI, or another campaign message against impaired driving)

If engaging in CTFGP grant-funded Saturation Patrols, DUI Checkpoints, or other enforcement activities in areas where the applicant does not have primary traffic jurisdiction, the applicant should consult with the agency having primary traffic jurisdiction.

If the Project includes limited, education-based activities, in conjunction with other enforcement-related activities/efforts, then Law Enforcement Organizations/Agencies should apply for this Law Enforcement Grant Opportunity.

If the Project, in its entirety, solely focuses on an innovative, education-based program for local communities, then Law Enforcement Organizations/Agencies should apply for the Education Grant Opportunity.

Eligible Project Cost Categories
Personnel
Costs may include compensation for wages, such as overtime, and benefits (annual leave and sick leave) for work directly related to, and consistent with, the Project. Personnel hours shall be awarded based on the number of CTFGP grant-funded Project activities approved by CGU.

To be eligible for reimbursement, personnel services must occur within the Project Performance Period.

Eligible expenses may include, but are not limited to:
• Hours worked on Project activities above and beyond normal work duties, including DUI Saturation Patrols and DUI Checkpoints
• Attend or instruct approved trainings related to impaired driving • Backfill for staff attending trainings

Travel
Costs may include travel associated with approved in-state and out-of-state Project-related conferences, seminars, workshops, and trainings. The most economical mode of travel, in terms of direct expenses to the Project, must be used. Out- of-state travel is only allowed in exceptional situations. To be eligible for reimbursement, travel must occur within the Project Performance Period.

Eligible expenses may include, but are not limited to:
• Mileage (based on current State rate) or fuel expenses (rental vehicles only) • Hotel accommodations for duration of event/training
• Commercial airline fares
• Parking fees
• Bridge tolls and/or taxi or bus fares

For maximum allowed per diem rates, including meals and lodging, please visit the California Department of Human Resources (CalHR) website:
https://www.calhr.ca.gov/employees/Pages/travel-reimbursements.aspx.

Equipment
Costs may include non-expendable, tangible, personal property having a normal useful life of more than one year, and an acquisition cost of at least $5,000 (ex: four identical assets, which cost $1,250 each, for a total of $5,000, are not considered an equipment purchase). Equipment shall be directly related and necessary to complete CTFGP grant-funded DUI/DUID enforcement, checkpoint, and education activities included in the Project. Equipment should be purchased at the beginning of the Project Performance Period to ensure it is utilized when completing corresponding Project activities. If requesting equipment, the Project shall contain a correlating CTFGP grant-funded Project activity that takes place in the Applicant’s jurisdiction (ex: message board for DUI checkpoints). To be eligible for reimbursement,

equipment must be purchased and received within the Project Performance Period. If requesting a vehicle, the requestor shall only request to outfit the vehicle with the standard equipment similar to the rest of the agency’s vehicle fleet.

Consultants/Contracts
Costs may include professional services necessary to carry out Project activities, including goals and deliverables, that are clearly outlined in the Grant Application. A copy of the Contract and/or Scope of Work must be submitted to and approved by the CGU prior to commencement of work. To be eligible for reimbursement, Consultants/Contracts services must occur within the Project Performance Period.

Eligible expenses may include, but are not limited to:
• Social media costs
• Billboards
• Advertisements

Other Direct Costs
Other Direct Costs shall be directly related and necessary to complete CTFGP grant-funded activities included in the Project. Other Direct Costs should be purchased at the beginning of the Project Performance Period to ensure they are utilized when completing corresponding Project activities. To be eligible for reimbursement, Other Direct Costs must be purchased and received within the Project Performance Period.

Eligible expenses may include, but are not limited to:
• Equipment with a single unit acquisition cost under $5,000 (ex: Preliminary Alcohol Screening [PAS] devices)
• Materials and Supplies (ex: cones, tents, small light towers, reflective vests) • Registration fees for approved conferences
• Educational/outreach materials (ex: brochures, pamphlets)

Additional Information
References
• Revenue and Taxation Code Section 34019
• California Code of Regulations, Title 13, Division 2, Chapter 13

For additional questions, please contact the Cannabis Grants Unit at (916) 843-4360 or via email at [email protected].

ANNEX A
Ineligible Expenses for
Law Enforcement Grant Opportunity

Items
Building/Facility Construction
Computers for Administrative Office Work
Drones/Drone Software, Accessories, and Storage
Entertainment
Equipment Giveaways
Equipment-Only Projects (Must have correlating CTFGP grant-funded project activity) Expenditures Outside the Project Period
Expenses not tied to a correlating project activity (ex: Request checkpoint supplies without a CTFGP funded Checkpoint within the project)
Facility Rental
Food During Enforcement Efforts (ex: Pizza at DUI checkpoint) Food For Personnel/Instructors/Training
Frozen Positions
Fuel, Mileage and Toll Costs (When using agency vehicles for travel)

Full Salary Positions
Gifts
Highway Construction, Maintenance, Design
Land
Law Enforcement Items (spike strips, lidar/radar, license plate reader, flock cameras, e-site printers, station-related software)
Liability Insurance
Lobbying Costs
Magnetic Decals (CTFGP funded vehicles)
Office Furniture and Fixtures
Overhead Costs (ex: Microsoft Office software, cellular plans, radio subscriptions, vehicle insurance & maintenance)
Personnel Costs to attend coalition meetings and meetings not specific to the planning and implementation of the CTFGP funded activities
Personnel Costs for Presenting at Conferences
Personnel Time for Conference, Seminar, or Workshop Attendance Personnel Support at Non CTFGP Funded Checkpoints
Professional Fees (ex: membership dues)
Speed Only Radar Signs
Supplanting
Surveillance/Undercover Vehicles
SWAT/Armored Vehicles
Traffic Investigation Equipment (ex: 3D scanners)

Travel (stays and expenses outside of event dates, third party travel site reservations, airline/hotel/rental car/ride share fees paid by rewards credits [ credits, points, etc.], upgraded services)
Travel for Presenting at Conferences
Unapproved Trainings, Equipment, and or Other Direct Costs Uniforms
Utilities
Weapons
Vehicle Operations Training
Vehicles used for administrative services

**The items listed above are provided as examples and do not constitute all ineligible costs**

13.F.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 3/3/2026 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Authorization for the City Manager to execute a service contract for Annual Chemical Supply Services to Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc., of Sacramento, CA, in the amount of $124,629.00 with an option to renew for two additional one-year terms

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a citywide service contract for annual chemical supply services to Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc., of Sacramento, CA, in the amount of $124,629.00, with an option to renew for two additional one-year terms.

Recommended Motion: I move to authorize the City Manager to execute a citywide service contract for annual chemical supply services to Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc., of Sacramento, CA, in the amount of $124,629.00, with an option to renew for two additional one-year terms.

BACKGROUND:

Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc., is the City's current chemical supply vendor on an annual blanket purchase order for several maintenance divisions. RFB 2026-16 was solicited for a new citywide chemical supply services contract. These chemicals are used for weed and pest management in City parks, storm ditches, storm basins, street roadsides, Water Conservation Plant grounds, and miscellaneous landscape areas throughout the City of Hanford. Included in the RFB’s scope of services are requirements for the awarded vendor to also provide pesticide handlers training to City staff, recommendations from a Certified Pest Control Advisor (PCA), review of onsite chemical storage, and chemical record to maintain compliance with the Department of Pesticide Regulation and County Ag Commissioner’s Office. The cost of this contract is budgeted annually by the appropriate divisions that use this contract within their operational budget.

On January 6, 2026, the City solicited bids by advertising in the Hanford Sentinel with the RFB posted on Bid-Net. The City also emailed RFB notices, inviting vendors to participate in this bid process.

On February 5, 2026, the City received bids from one (1) vendor: Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc. Staff reviewed the bid for calculation errors, conformance with specifications, and determined that any stated substitutions are appropriate.

Annual price increase adjustments at the time of renewal of contract are based on the Consumer Price Index specified in the contract documents. The contract unit prices may be changed in an amount equal to the percentage of movement for the most recent twelve-month period closest to the

anniversary month of the contract. In no instance shall the price increase exceed 5%

The initial agreement is for a one-year term, with an option to renew for two additional one-year terms upon providing satisfactory performance and as mutually agreed.

Staff are confident in Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc.’s ability to provide the chemicals required to maintain the City of Hanford, based on their several years of reliable service and consistent delivery of required products.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The services for this contract are budgeted in various Public Works Maintenance Divisions and Utility and Engineering Maintenance Divisions within their operational budgets. The contract is for an annual amount of $124,629 amongst these divisions.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Annual Contract for Chemical Supply Services

2. Exhibit A Bid Form

3. Exhibit C Draft Agreement

CITY OF HANFORD, CALIFORNIA

REQUEST FOR BIDS
RFB NO. 2026-16

ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR

CHEMICAL SUPPLY SERVICES

SUBMITTAL DEADLINE:

Thursday, February 5, 2026
at or before 2:00 p.m. local time

Release Date:

Tuesday, January 6, 2026

RFB 2026-16

ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR CHEMICAL SUPPLY SERVICES
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS

TITLE PAGE

I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 3

II. INSTRUCTIONS .......................................................................................................................... 3

III. PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS/SCOPE OF SERVICE .......................................................... 4

IV. PRE-BID AND CONTRACT MEETINGS ................................................................................ 4

V. BID OPENING AND CONFIDENTIALITY ............................................................................. 4

VI. AWARD ......................................................................................................................................... 5

VII. PROTESTS/APPEALS ................................................................................................................ 5

VIII. SPECIAL CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................ 6

IX. GENERAL CONDITIONS .......................................................................................................... 6

X. POST AWARD RESPONSIBILITIES ....................................................................................... 9

EXHIBITS

A. BID FORM ...................................................................................................................................... 10

B. CERTIFICATIONS, AFFIDAVITS, ASSURANCES, STATEMENTS, WAIVERS, AND QUESTIONNAIRES WHICH MUST ACCOMPANY BID FORM ......................................... 15

C. SAMPLE PROJECT AGREEMENT WITH ATTACHMENTS .............................................. 21

D. SCOPE OF WORK ........................................................................................................................ 27

RFB 2026-16

ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR CHEMICAL SUPPLY SERVICES
3 I. INTRODUCTION

The City of Hanford Purchasing Division is soliciting Bids for an annual contract for services to provide weed and pest abatement chemicals, poisons, pesticide handlers training, Certified Pest Control Advisory recommendations, and headquarters inspection for Water Conservati on Plant and P ublic Works Divisions on an as needed basis.

The initial contract shall be for a twelve (12) month period and shall, at the City’s option and upon mutually agreeable terms, be renewable annually thereafter for two (2) consecutive one -year periods. Bids are sought from contractors who have a proven record of experience in providing the services required by this Invitation to Bid. The successful bidder shall be responsible for providing all services necessary to fulfill the requirements of this Invitation to Bid upon receipt of the City’s Notice to Proceed.

Local Vendor Preference: In an effort to encourage local businesses to provide goods and services to the City, the Council has enacted a Local Vendor Preference policy. The Local Vendor Preference policy will apply to any business that has a fixed business address within Hanford C ity limits. A Post Office Box will not be accepted as a business address. The City reserves the right to request proof of the City of Hanford address.

The City hereby ensures that Minority Business Enterprises and Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) will be afforded full opportunity to submit proposed bid in response to this notice. Individuals and entities submitting bids to the City of Hanford will not be discriminated against on the basis of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, physical or mental disability, medical condition, genetic status, marital status, gender, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, military and veteran status in any consideration leading to the award of contract.

No qualified disabled person shall, on the basis of disability, be excluded from participating in, be denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity leading to the award of a contract.

II. INSTRUCTIONS

1. Fill out attached Bid Form Exhibit A in its entirety.

2. Submit bid onto Bidnet Website https://www.bidnetdirect.com/california/cityofhanford and include each of the required Certifications, Affidavits, Statements and Questionnaires as well as optional waiver(s) with the Bid response. City will not consider bids which are not accompanied by the required completed forms.

3. All questions pertaining to this bid solicitation should be submitted through the City of Hanford Bidne t website using the questions and answers tab. Bidders may also contact the Purchasing Department by email at [email protected].

Questions are due no later than 4:00 p.m. on Wednesday, January 28, 2026.

RFB 2026-16

ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR CHEMICAL SUPPLY SERVICES
4 III. PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS/SCOPE OF SERVICES
The City of Hanford is requesting bids for services to provide the following weed and pest abatement chemicals, poisons, pesticide handlers training, and Certified Pest Control Advisor recommendations for Water Conservation Plant, Utilities, Streets, and Parks Divisions on an as needed basis. The exact quantity of or need for each item is unknown and the City does not guarantee to purchase any amount. Products shall be ordered from vendors in an Annual Purchase Order.

CHEMICALS
PARKS: Chemical Name Type of Chemical Size of Container Estimate AquaMaster Herbicide Herbicide 2.5 gallon jug 100 gal/yr.

Aquashade Pond water dye 1 gallon jug 20 gal/yr.

Bayer Round-up PROMAX Herbicide 1.67 gallon jug 500 gal/yr.

Burrow Rx Smoke Oil Rodenticide 1 pint bottle 36 pints/yr.

Cheetah Pro Herbicide 2.5 gallon jug 500 gal/yr.

Clearcast Herbicide 2.5 gallon jug 100 gal/yr.

Dimension 2EW Herbicide 2.5 gallon jug 50 gal/yr.

Dismiss CA Turf Herbicide Herbicide 6 oz. bottle 100 oz/yr.

Finale XL T&O Herbicide 2.5 gal jug 120 gal/yr.

Fusilade 2000 Herbicide 32 oz. bottle 5 gal/yr.

Gallery SC Pre-emergent 2 gallon jug 50 gal/yr.

Goal 2XL Herbicide 2.5 gal jug 50 gal/yr.

Merit 75 WSP Insecticide 4 x 1.6 oz bottles 6.4 oz. yr.

No Foam B Surfactant 1 gallon jug 8 gal/yr.

Pendulum AquaCap Pre-emergent 2.5 gal jug 100 gal/yr.

SedgeHammer Herbicide 1.3 oz bottle 2.6 oz./yr.

Speed Zone Southern EW Herbicide 128 oz jug 60 gal/yr.

Syngenta Reward Herbicide 2.5 gallon jug 100 gal/yr.

TS Pro Pacific Blue Dye 2.5 gallon jug 30 gal/yr.

Target Pro Spreader Adjuvant 1 gallon jug 30 gal/yr.

Tribute Total Herbicide 6 oz bottle 50 oz/yr.

Vista XRT Herbicide 2.5 gallon jug 500 oz/yr.

Wilco Gopher Getter type II Rodenticide 1 lb can 35 lbs/yr.

Wilco Ground Squirrel Bait Rodenticide 20 lb bag 100 lbs/yr.

RFB 2026-16

ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR CHEMICAL SUPPLY SERVICES
5 1. TRADE NAME/SUBSITUTIONS: In cases where an item is identified by a manufacturer’s name, trade name, catalog number, or reference it is understood that the Bidder proposes to furnish the item so identified and does not propose to furnish an “equal/substitution” unless submission of an “equal/substitution” is stated otherwise as permissible. Any Bidder who contemplates offering a product that differs from that specified must obtain the City’s written approval prior to submitting bid. The Purchasing Agent hereby reserves the right to approve as an equal, or to reject as not being an equal, any article the Bidder proposes to furnish which contains major or minor variations from specification requirements but may comply substantially therewith. Bidder must submit on all products listed.

2. DELIVERY PROVISIONS
a. Delivery: Delivery shall be within three (3) days of order. The Awarded Contractor (Supplier) shall be required to furnish proof of delivery in every instance. Bulk materials are to be placed on skids or pallets. City staff shall not assist with unloading. Suppliers shall notify their shippers accordingly.
b. Locations: Parks Division Waste Water Treatment Plant Project Manager-Alvin Dias Project Manager-Jason Rodrigues 900 S. 10
th Ave. 10555 Houston Ave
Hanford, CA Hanford, CA

c. Time of Delivery: Deliveries shall be accepted between 8:00 A.M. and 3:00 P.M. on weekdays only. No deliveries shall be accepted on Saturdays, Sundays or City Holidays, unless otherwise arranged by an individual Department/Agency.
d. Delivery Failures: Failure to deliver within the specified time, or failure to make replacements of rejected articles when requested, immediately or as directed by the Purchasing Agent shall constitute authority for the Purchasing Agent to purchase in the open market articles of comparable grade to replace the articles rejected or not delivered. On all such purchases, the Bidder shall reimburse the City, within a reasonable time specified by the Purchasing Agent, for any expense incurred in excess of contract prices or the City may deduct such amount from monies owed the Contractor. Such purchases shall be deducted from contract quantities.

3. INSPECTIONS: Inspection and acceptance of materials or supplies shall be made after delivery.

Final inspection shall be conclusive except as regards latent defects, fraud, or such gross mistakes as amount to fraud. Final inspection and acceptance or rejection of the ma terials or supplies shall be made as promptly as practicable, but failure to inspect and accept or reject materials or supplies shall not impose liability on the City for such materials or supplies as are not in accordance with the specificati ons. All delivered materials shall be accepted subject to inspection and physical count.

4. SAFETY DATA SHEETS (SDS): Any hazardous substances as defined under the Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Standard for General Industry (29-CFR-1910.1200) and State of California Law and Regulations, being delivered to City of Hanford as a result of this Invitation to Bid shall be accompanied by a current " Safety Data Sheet" or item may not be accepted.

RFB 2026-16

ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR CHEMICAL SUPPLY SERVICES
6 6. PACKING SLIPS OR DELIVERY TICKETS: All shipments or deliveries shall be accompanied by Packing Slips or Delivery Tickets and shall contain the following information for each item delivered. Bidders are cautioned that failure to comply with these conditions shall be considered sufficient reason for refusal to accept the goods.

• The Purchase Order or Contract Number
• The Name of the Article and Stock Number (Supplier’s) • Delivery Date
• The Quantity Ordered
• The Quantity Back Ordered
• The Name of the Contractor

7. RESPONSIBILITY FOR MATERIALS SHIPPED: The Awarded Contractor shall be responsible for the materials covered by this contract until they are delivered at the designated point and bear all risk on rejected materials or supplies after notice of rejection. Rejected materials or supplies must be re moved by and at the expense of the A promptly after notification of rejection, unless public health and safety require immediate destruction or other disposal of rejected delivery. Upon failure of the Bidder to remove materials or supplies within ten (10) calendar days after date of notification, the City may return the rejected materials or supplies to the Bidder at the Bidder’s risk and expense or dispose of them as its own property.

8. PRICING: Prices bid shall include all transportation and freight costs to the point of delivery to the applicable facilities. The unit bid prices shall also includ e all appurtenant and incidental costs associated with the chemical including all costs associated with the pickup, return, cleaning and/or proper disposal of chemical containers, fuel, special insurance, etc.

9. CONTRACTOR REFERENCES: Bidders shall include in their response a list of at least three (3) organizations which can be used as references for performance of similar services. Contractor shall endeavor to include references of work performed for public sector agencies. Include the name and telephone number for the contact person. Selected organizations will be contacted to determine the quality of work performed and the personnel assigned to the job.

10. ALLOCATIONS: In the event the vendor’s supply of awarded items is reduced for reasons beyond the vendor’s control to a level which prevents supply of the City’s requirements in full, the vendor agrees to supply the City no less than a proportionate share delivered to similar accounts, unless Federal regulations require otherwise. If such a reduction occurs, the City reserves the right to cancel all or part of the contract without prejudice to either party, by giving the vendor thirty (30) days written notice.

RFB 2026-16

ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR CHEMICAL SUPPLY SERVICES
7 THE AWARDED VENDOR MUST PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF HANFORD:

1. PESTICIDE HANDLERS TRAINING: In alignment with the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (California Code of Regulations number 6724), conduct a comprehensive 4- hour training class covering the following subjects:
a. Pesticide Worker Safety
b. Hazardous Materials/Worker Right to Know Training

2. CERTIFIED PEST CONTROL ADVISOR: Provide a licensed California Pest Control Advisor, certified in all categories, to offer diagnoses and state-required written recommendations.

3. HEADQUARTERS INSPECTION: Conduct pest control headquarters inspections, specifically focusing on pesticide storage and record-keeping at designated City of Hanford locations.

IV. PREBID AND CONTRACT MEETINGS

1. Pre-Bid Teleconference. A non -mandatory pre -bid teleconference will be held via TEAMS on Wednesday, January 21, 2026 at 10:00 a.m. To register for this teleconference, please email your contact information to [email protected] and a link to attend the meeting will be emailed to you.

Attendance at this meeting is not required to submit a Bid in response to this RFB but is highly encouraged as information regarding the project will be discussed and an opportunity to ask questions will be provided.

2. Post Award Meeting. Subsequent to the award of contract, the Contractor /Vendor shall meet with the Project Manager prior to the purchase of the product/work to discuss any problems or questions that may arise.

City Project Manager: Alvin Dias, Deputy Director
Department: Public Works

V. BID OPENING AND CONFIDENTIALITY

1. Bid Opening. Bids shall be opened digitally and publicly posted on Bidnet on Thursday, February 5, 2026 at 2:00 p.m. The name of each Bidder and the amount of each Bid shall be posted on Bidnet immediately after Bid Opening. Bids will be open to public inspection after an award decision has been made. Other Bid information will not be available for public review during the evaluation phase.

2. Bid Confidentiality. The City favors full and open disclosure of all bid records. The City will not expend public funds defending claims for access to, inspection of, or to be provided copies of any such records. By submitting a bid, a Bidder agrees to indemnify and defend the City against all claims or actions brought against it to seek access to, or compel disclosure of, any records or documents in the City’s possession. After the award, the City intends to post award information onto the City’s Proposal and Bid Bidnet Website. Respondents are advised that the California Public Records Act (“PRA”) provides that any person may inspect or be provided a copy of any identif iable public record or document that is not exempted from disclosure by the express provisions of the Act. The Federal Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) contains a simil ar provision. Each Bidder shall clearly identify any information within its Bid that it intends to ask the City to withhold as exempt

RFB 2026-16

ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR CHEMICAL SUPPLY SERVICES
8 under either the PRA or FOIA. Any information contained in a Bidder’s submission which the Bidder believes qualifies for exemption from public disclosure as “Proprietary” or “Confidential” must be identified as such at the time of first submission of Bidder’s Bid to this RFB. Any failure to identify information contained in a Bidder’s Bid to this RFB as “Proprietary” or “Confidential” shall constitute a waiver of Bidder’s right to object to the release of such information upon request under either Act.

VI. AWARD

Most Responsive Responsible Bidder: A Contract substantially similar to that attached hereto as Exhibit C shall be awarded with reasonable promptness by appropriate written notice. Award shall be made to the most responsive, responsible Bidder whose bid meets the requirements and criteria set forth in this RFB, price and other factors considered, and whose bid is determined to result in the optimum economic advantage for the City. A responsible Bidder is one who has the capability, financial capacity and integrity to perform the contract.

A responsive Bidder is one who commits to all of the material terms, for example, price, quantity, quality and delivery, of this RFB. Contractor must return a signed copy of the contract provided by the City with its Award Notice to City within ten (10) working days of receipt thereof.

It shall be illegal for any payment, gratuity, or offer of employment to be made by or on behalf of a vendor or any person associated with contracting, as an inducement for the award of BID.

Reservation of Rights: The City reserves the right to reject any item or items in the Bid; to waive informalities, technical defects, and minor irregularities in bids received; and to select the bid(s) deemed most advantageous to the City.

VII. PROTEST/APPEALS
Because it is essential that Bidders have confidence in the procurement procedures for soliciting and awarding contracts, it is the policy of the City to offer Bidders the opportunity to appeal award of contracts. The following procedures shall apply in regard to appeals:

Any Bidder who is allegedly aggrieved in connection with the solicitation or award of a contract may protest.

Bidders are to be advised that protests of the process, terms, conditions or any other aspect of the RFB, must be made prior to the bid due date. Bidders may not protest the contents o r the specifications of the bid nor the award based on the use of the Local Vendor Preference. Protests must be transmitted by facsimile, email or by mail to the attention of the City Purchasing Agent.

Protest of the award must be made immediately, and in no event later than five (5) working days after the Bid award has been publicized. All protests must include the following information:

1. The name, address, telephone number and email address of the protestor.

2. The signature of the protestor or protestor's representative.

3. The bid, solicitation or proposal number.

4. A detailed statement of the legal and/or factual grounds of the protest and all documentation supporting the Bidder’s position at the time of the initial protest.

5. The form of relief requested (if applicable).

6. The Purchasing Manager or designee shall respond in writing within five working days to the protestor. If the protestor wishes to appeal the decision rendered by the Purchasing Agent, such appeal must be made in writing to the City Manager within five (5) working days of the Purchasing Agent's response.

RFB 2026-16

ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR CHEMICAL SUPPLY SERVICES
9 VIII. SPECIAL CONDITIONS

1. Product

a. Complete Project : The successful Bidder shall be responsible for providing all materials, labor, equipment and services necessary to fulfill the requirements of this RFB.

b. Product Inspection: The City will have ten (10) working days to inspect chemicals for conformance to all requirements of this specification. If deficiencies are detected, the materials will be rejected, and the vendor will be required to make necessary adjustments or replacements. Payment and/or commencement of a discount period, if applicable, will not be made until the defects are corrected and the equipment re-inspected and accepted.

2. City-Contractor Relations

a. Project Manager’s Responsibility and Authority: The City’s designated representative shall decide issues of quality and acceptability of materials, products and equipment and all questions related to fulfillment of the contract for the products. City designated representative shall not have control over acts or omissions of the Company, Contractor, Subcontractors, their agents or employees.

b. Control of Materials : Source of Supply and Quality of Materials /Equipment/Work Guarantee: All materials, parts, equipment and work supplied by the Contractor shall be new and/or of a quality equal to that specified.

c. Equivalent Materials. Trade names or manufacturer’s catalog information, where used, are a means of indicating kind, type, design, style, finish, durability or quality desired and are not intended to exclude or omit the products of any responsible manufacturer, if such products are equal in every respect to those specified. The burden of proof of compliance with the specifications is the responsibility of Contractor. City shall be the sole judge as to the adequacy of any item for substitution.

a. Manufacturer’s Directions: Manufactured articles, materials and equipment shall be applied, installed, connected, erected, used, cleaned and conditioned as directed by the manufacturer.

b. Legal Responsibilities: It is the responsibility of Contractor to comply with all local, state, and federal laws and regulations which apply to this project. This includes, but is not limited to, compliance with Uniform Building, Plumbing, Mechanical, Electric, and Fire Codes. Contractor shall provide a safe working environment in compliance with the Occupational Safety and Health Act, and California Health and Safety Codes. Additionally, Contractor shall secure all necessary permits, licenses, and similar requirements to carry out the project. Contractor shall comply with all applicable labor laws and ensure against discrimination.

IX. GENERAL CONDITIONS
It is the policy of the City to provide equal opportunity to all candidates when selecting Bidders to provide public services. Bidders are expected to be equal opportunity employers.

The City of Hanford hereby affirmatively ensures that Minority Business Enterprises and Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) will be afforded full opportunity to submit proposals in response to this notice.

Individuals and/or entities submitting bids/proposals to the City of Hanford will not be discriminated against

RFB 2026-16

ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR CHEMICAL SUPPLY SERVICES
10 on the basis of age, race, religion, creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical or mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, gender, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status in consideration for an award.

No qualified disabled person shall, on the basis of disability, be excluded from participating in, be denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity that receives or benefits from Federal financial assistance.

1. Post-Closing Date Corrections are prohibited.

2. Bidder shall provide to the City a list of all instances within the last five (5) years where a complaint was filed or pending against Bidder in a legal or administrative proceeding alleging that Bidder discriminated against its employees, subcontractors, vendors or suppliers. A description of the status or resolution of that complaint, including any remedial action taken is required.

3. Executive Order N-6-22 – Russia Sanctions. On March 4, 2022, Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N -6-22 (the EO) regarding Economic Sanctions against Russia and Russian entities and individuals. “Economic Sanctions” refers to sanctions imposed by the U.S. government in response to Russia’s actions in Ukraine, as well as any sanctions imposed under state law. The EO directs state agencies to terminate contracts with, and to refrain from entering any new contracts with, individuals or entities that are determined to be a target of Economic Sa nctions. Accordingly, should the State determine Contractor is a target of Economic Sanctions or is conducting prohibited transactions with sanctioned individuals or entities, that shall be grounds for termination of this agreement. The State shall provide Contractor advance written notice of such termination, allowing Contractor at least 30 calendar days to provide a written response. Termination shall be at the sole discretion of the State.

4. Bids will not be accepted unless signed in ink (not typed) in the appropriate space(s) by an authorized officer or employee of the Bidder.

5. Bids must be submitted via upload to the City’s Bid and Proposal Bidnet Website on or before the Closing Due Date. Any Bids will not be capable of upload after the Closing Due Date as the website automatically prevents upload of documents.

6. Bids may be withdrawn if uploaded to City’s Bidnet Website prior to the Bid Closing Due Date by phone call or email to the City Purchasing Agent.

7. Electronic submittal via online upload of Bids documents is the only acceptable form of submittal.

8. Bid Prices submitted are considered accurate for a period of ninety (90) days and cannot be withdrawn after the Closing Due Date.

9. All Bids are the property of the City after submission.

10. City is not responsible for Bid errors and omissions.

11. Bids should be prepared in a straightforward, concise manner. Information provided which was not specifically requested will be considered only at City’s discretion.

12. A written amendment or addenda issued by City’s Purchasing Division is the only method which should be relied on with respect to changes to the RFB. Respondent is responsible for monitoring the Bidnet Website

RFB 2026-16

ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR CHEMICAL SUPPLY SERVICES
11 for any and all amendment and/or addenda pertinent to this RFB. The City of Hanford is not responsible for failure of Bidder to acknowledge addenda notice.

13. Any contract resulting from the RFB will and may be jointly administered by City Purchasing Division, Department requesting Bids, and City Council.

14. Prior to conducting business in the City, a business tax certificate (license) must be obtained. Please c all (559) 585-2506 for more information on how to obtain the license.

15. Bidder shall provide insurance as required by law and as indicated in the proposed contract.

16. In an effort to encourage local business to provide goods and services to the City, the Council has enacted a Local Vendor Preference policy. The preference affords to businesses located within Hanford City limits a five (5) percent preference and will apply to any business that has a fixed business address within Hanford city limits. A Post Office Box will not be accepted as a business address. The City reserves the right to request proof of the City of Hanford address. Tie bids shall be aw arded to a local merchant to the extent quality and prices are equal. If neither is a local vendor, the Bid shall be awarded by the flip of a co in by the Purchasing Division in the presence of at least one witness.

17. The City may make such investigation of the Bidder and information in the Bid as it determines necessary.

This may include the collection of criminal history information, contractual and business associations and practices, employment histories and reputation.

18. Each Bidder will be required to submit Certifications, Affidavits, Assurances, Statements and Questionnaires which are attached to this Request For Bid as Exhibits A through D.

19. The quantities given on the Bid Proposal form and any related contract documents are approximate only.

They are given as a basis for comparison of Bids. The City of Hanford does not, expressly or impliedly agree that the actual amount of work will correspond therewith but reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of any class or portion of work, or to omit portion of the work, as the City deems necessary or advisable, at the prices Bid.

20. Bidders shall satisfy themselves by personal examination of the specifications and other contract documents and by any other means they believe necessary as to the requirements of this bid document. The submission of a Bid shall be conclusive evidence that the Bidder has investigated, and is satisfied as to the conditions, quality, and quantities of equipment/materials/work to be performed, and the products to be furnished, and as to the requirements of the RFB and the City. No allowance shall subsequently be made because of lack of such examination or knowledge.

21. All Bidders are required to make a Bid on the complete Bid Form Exhibit A. The City reserves the right to award the contract based on the lowest combination or combinations of bid items and alternate bid items , if any.

22. The City of Hanford is not liable for any costs incurred by Bidder in responding to this Request for Bid.

23. The contract resulting from this invitation to bid will be administered by the Public Works Department.

However, the City’s Purchasing Division with the assistance of the Department Director, Finance Director, City Manager and City Attorney shall be the final judge concerning issues or matters related to contract interpretation or problems regarding the terms, conditions or scope of the contract.

RFB 2026-16

ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR CHEMICAL SUPPLY SERVICES
12 24. The initial contract term shall be for a twelve (12) month period and shall, at the City’s option and with the consent of the CONTRACTOR, be extended annually thereafter for two (2) consecutive one-year periods.

Contract shall begin no later than 15 days from the receipt of annual contract.

25. All prices quoted in response to this Invitation to Bid shall be firm and fixed for twelve (12) months from the annual anniversary date of the agreement. In order to protect the interests of the City and to give the vendor a reasonable basis for bidding, a price adjustment feature is hereby incorporated into the specifications. Prices bid by vendor may be adjusted annually at time of contract renewal and upon mutual agreement of the parties to the contract to allow for price increases or decreases for labor and benefit rates, supplies and materials.

It will be the responsibility of the contractor to request a price adjustment and to provide all documentation necessary. The request for price adjustment must be submitted to the project manager in writing a minimum of thirty (30) but no sooner than ninet y (90) calendar days prior to the annual anniversary date of the agreement. Requests filed after this time period will not be considered.

The unit prices for the ensuing contracts shall be based on the movement of the unadjusted figures of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index (CPI) for all Urban Consumers (CPI -U U.S. City Average, All Items). The contract unit prices may be changed in an amount equal to the percentage of movement for the most recent twelve -month period closest to the anniversary month of contract. In no instance shall the price increase exceed 5%. The contracts unit price changes as a result of this formula shall be binding on the contractor for the subsequent contract year. The adjustment of the unit bid price shall not be retroactive and shall apply only to changes incurred after approval.

26. This contract may be terminated without cause by the City, in whole or in part, by giving the Contractor fifteen (15) days written notice of the intent to terminate whenever the City determines that termination is in the best interest of the City.

27. If the Contractor shall fail to provide materials/equipment/services or perform satisfactorily the work required by the terms and conditions of the contract, or materially breaches any of its obligations under this agreement the City may terminate the contract, in whole or in part by written notice. Termination shall take effect ten (10) calendar days after the date of mailing said termination notice.

Any assignment, subletting or transfer of the interest of the contractor, either in whole or in part, without the written consent of the City shall be cause for the City to immediately terminate the agreement for default.

28. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this agreement, this agreement may be terminated by the City upon a single violation of this agreement.

29. Cancellation Due to Unavailability of Funds in Succeeding Fiscal Periods (Funding- out Clause). When funds are not appropriated or otherwise made available to support continuation of performance in a subsequent fiscal period, the contract shall be canceled, and the contractor shall be reimbursed for the reasonable value of any non-recurring costs incurred but not amortized in the price of supplies or services delivered under the contract. The cost of cancellation may be paid from any appropriations availabl e for such purposes. A specific boilerplate contract clause is required to ensure the City’s right to cancel due to unavailability of funds.

RFB 2026-16

ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR CHEMICAL SUPPLY SERVICES
13 X. POST AWARD RESPOSIBILITIES

1. Written Contract with City: A written agreement in a form similar to that attached to this Request for Bid as Exhibit C must be entered into between the City and the Contractor to whom the bid is awarded.

The Agreement forms the basis for the contractual obligation between t he parties regarding the supplies equipment or service . A contract will be provided with the Notice of Award and must be executed and returned to City within ten (10) working days of the date of award notification unless otherwise agreed.

2. Post-Award Responsibilities: Upon execution of the Agreement between the City and the Contractor, the Contractor shall immediately report all changes in its Articles of Incorporation, By -Laws, or Tax-Exempt status to the City.

3. Insurance. Contractor shall obtain and maintain the minimum insurance coverage outlined in this solicitation. Contractor shall provide evidence of such insurance to Project Manager prior to commencement of work.

RFB 2026-16

ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR CHEMICAL SUPPLY SERVICES
14 EXHIBIT A

BID FORM
RFB No. 2026-16

ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR SUPPLY OF CHEMICALS

TO: THE CITY OF HANFORD PURCHASING DIVISION:

In compliance with the City’s Notice Inviting Bids for RFB 202 6-16 dated: __________, the undersigned Bidder hereby proposes to supply, program, configure, deliver, and install mobile and portable radios, including related support equipment for use by the Fire Department, as specified in this RFB, including all exhibits and related contract documents, therefore.

Bidder declares that this bid proposal is based upon careful examination of the Instructions to Bidders, and the contract requirements. If this bid is accepted for award, B idder agrees to enter into a contract with the City at the unit and/or lump sum prices set forth in the following Bid Schedule. Bidder understands that failure to enter into a contract in the time and manner stated may result in said Purchasing Division proceeding to award the contract to others.

Bidder understands that a bid is required for the product and that compensation under this contract will be based upon the product condition received as stated in the bid specifications. It is agreed that the price bid includes all appurtenant expenses, taxes, royalties , installation, delivery, training, and fees for the purchase of the product. Bidder is to indicate the cost for delivery to Hanford, CA (if any). Bidder is to list tax where indicated, as the City is not exempt from paying sales tax (currently 8.25% in Hanford, CA).

Bidder further declares that their company has not either directly or indirectly entered into any agreement, participated in any collusion, or otherwise taken any action in restraint of free competitive bidding in connection with said bid.

All bids will be checked for accuracy. In the case of discrepancies in amounts bid, unit prices shall govern over extended amounts.

The Low Bidder will be based on the Lowest Total Bid Amount. After the lowest bidder has been determined, the City reserves the right to award the contract, if it is awarded, to the lowest bidder who is deemed both responsive and responsible and meets all criteria set forth in the bid specifications. The City reserves the right to increase or decrease actual quantities of product ordered at the stated unit cost, including tax and shipping cost, as funding allows. B idder has read and hereby agrees to the conditions stated in this bid by affixing authorized signature on the bid form.

RFB 2026-16

ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR CHEMICAL SUPPLY SERVICES
15 Item
#
Chemical Name Size of
Container Unit Price Annual
Qty
Total Annual
Cost
(Includes
freight/delivery
and all fees)
1 AquaMaster Herbicide

2.5 gal.
jug $ __________ X 40 = $ ______________
2 Aquashade 1 gal. jug $ __________ X 20 = $ ______________ 3 Bayer Round-up PROMAX

1.67 gal.
jug $ __________ X 300 = $ ______________
4 Burrow Rx Smoke Oil
1 pint
bottle $ __________ X 36 = $ ______________
5 Cheetah Pro

2.5 gal.
jug $ __________ X 200 = $ ______________
6 Clearcast

2.5 gal.
jug $ __________ X 40 = $ ______________
7 Dimension 2EW

2.5 gal.
jug $ __________ X 20 = $ ______________
8 Dismiss CA Turf Herbicide
6 oz.
bottle $ __________ X 16 = $ ______________
9 Finale XL T&O

2.5 gal.
jug $ __________ X 48 = $ ______________
10 Fusilade 2000
32 oz.
bottle $ __________ X 20 = $ ______________
11 Gallery SC

2.5 gal.
jug $ __________ X 25 = $ ______________
12 Goal 2XL

2.5 gal.
jug $ __________ X 20 = $ ______________
13 Merit 75 WSP
4 x 1.6 oz
bottles $ __________ X 1 = $ ______________
14 No Foam B
1 gallon
jug $ __________ X 8 = $ ______________
15 Pendulum AquaCap

2.5 gal.
jug $ __________ X 40 = $ ______________
16 SedgeHammer

1.3 oz
bottle $ __________ X 2 = $ ______________
17 Speed Zone Southern EW
128 oz.
jug $ __________ X 60 = $ ______________
18 Syngenta Reward

2.5 gal.
jug $ __________ X 40 = $ ______________
19 TS Pro Pacific Blue

2.5 gal.
jug $ __________ X 12 = $ ______________
20 Target Pro Spreader 1 gal. jug $ __________ X 30 = $ ______________

RFB 2026-16

ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR CHEMICAL SUPPLY SERVICES
16 21
Tribute Total
6 oz.
bottle $ __________ X 8 = $ ______________
22 Vista XRT

2.5 gal.
jug $ __________ X 200 = $ ______________
23 Wilco Gopher Getter type II 1 lb. can $ __________ X 35 = $ ______________ 24 Wilco Ground Squirrel Bait 20 lb. bag $ __________ X 5 = $ ______________ 25 Tax (8.25% sales tax in Hanford, CA) $ ______________ TOTAL ANNUAL COST (Items 1-25) $ ______________

Delivery FOB Destination Hanford

Delivery Time: _______ Days After Order Placed

Warranty Coverage: ________ year(s)

Does the Bid meet specifications listed in the Scope of Work: _____ Yes _____ No

If no, and in order to assist the City in the evaluation of bids, please indicate variances, no matter how slight, to explain why the product bid would not meet bid specifications below. A separate sheet of paper may be submitted if needed.

________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________ Bidding Firm

_____________________________________________________________________________________ Corporation, Partner, Joint Venture

_____________________________________________________________________________________ Business Address City State Zip Code

(____)________________________________________________________________________________ Telephone Number E-mail Address

_____________________________________________________________________________________ Signature of Authorized Person (Date)

_____________________________________________________________________________________ Type or Print Authorized Person’s Name

RFB 2026-16

ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR CHEMICAL SUPPLY SERVICES
17 PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING SIGNATURE

1. If the Bidder is an individual, enter name here in style used in business; if a joint venture, exact name of entities joining in the venture; if a partnership, the correct trade style of the partnership; if a corporation, the exact name of the corporation.

2. If B idder is other than an individual, identify here its charact 12er, i.e., joint venture, partnership, corporation, including the state of incorporation. If BIDDER is an individual operating under a trade name, state “an individual dba (trade name in full)”.

3. State on this line, the address to which all communications and notices regarding the Bid Proposal, and any contract awarded thereunder, are to be addressed.

4. If Bidder is a joint venture, signature must be by one of the joint venturers, and if one or both of the joint venturers is a partnership or a corporation, each participating partnership must sign by a general partner, and each corporation by an authorized officer or employee; if a partnership, by a general partner; if a corporation, by an authorized officer or employee. The title of the person signing must appear after his/her signature. Where B idder is a partnership or corporation, the names of all other general partners, or the president or secretary of the corporation and their business addresses must be shown below.

________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ Note: All names must be typewritten under written signature. All Addresses must be complete with street number, city, state and zip code.

CITY OF HANFORD BUSINESS TAX CERTIFICATE NO .: _______________________________ A City Business Tax Certificate/License is not required to submit a bid; however, vendor is required to obtain a license prior to commencement of work. Please contact the Business Tax Division at (559) 585 -2506 with any questions.

Federal Tax I.D. No.: ____________________________________________________

REFERENCES
The following are the names, addresses, and telephone numbers for at least three (3) agencies for which BIDDER has provided equipment to similar in size and scope within the past two (2) years.

_____________________________________________________________________________________ Company Name Address Phone Contact

_____________________________________________________________________________________ Company Name Address Phone Contact

_____________________________________________________________________________________ Company Name Address Phone Contact

RFB 2026-16

ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR CHEMICAL SUPPLY SERVICES
18 EXHIBIT B-1

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
(EXECUTIVE ORDER 11246)

Unless exempted by rules, regulations or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Executive Orders 10925, 11114 or Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, during the performance of each contract with the City of Hanford, the Proposer agrees as follows:

1. The Bidder will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, gender, national origin or political affiliation. The proposer will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, a nd that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, gender, national origin or political affiliation.

Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitm ent or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, incl uding apprenticeship. The proposer agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided by the contracting officer setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause.

2. The proposer will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees, placed by or on behalf of the proposer, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, gender, national origin or political affiliation.

3. The proposer will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided by the agency contracting officer, advising the labor union or the workers’ representative of the proposer commitments under Section 202 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and shall post copies of the notice on conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment.

4. The proposer will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and the rules, regulations and relevancy orders of the Secretary of Labor.

5. The proposer will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by the rules, regulations and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records an d accounts by the contracting agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations and orders.

6. In the event of the proposer’s non-compliance with the non -discrimination clauses of this subcontract or with any of such rules, regulations or orders, this subcontract may be canceled, terminated or suspended, in whole, or in part and the proposer may be declared ineligible for further government contracts in accordance with the procedures authorized in accordance with Executiv e Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulation or order of the Secretary of Labor, or otherwise provided by law.

7. The proposer will include the provisions of Paragraphs (1) through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The proposer will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the contracting agency may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for non-compliance. Provided, however, that in the event the proposer becomes involved in, or is threatened with litigation with a subcontractor or vendor as a result of such direction by the contracting agency, the proposer may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interest of the United States.

Company Name: _________________________________________________________ Business Address: ________________________________________________________ Signature: _______________________________________________________________ Name of Signing Official (type): _____________________________________________ Title of Signing Official (type): ______________________________________________ Date: ___________________________________________________________________ Company Seal:

RFB 2026-16

ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR CHEMICAL SUPPLY SERVICES
19 EXHIBIT B-2

NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss

CITY OF HANFORD )

_________________________, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that he or she is _________ of __________ the party making the foregoing Bid; that the Bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the Bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the BIDDER has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other BIDDER to put in a false or sham Bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any BIDDER or anyone else to put in a sham Bid, or that anyone shall refrain from Bidding; that the BIDDER has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the Bid price of the BIDDER or any other BIDDER, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the Bid price, or of that of any other BIDDER, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the Bid are true; and, further, that the BIDDER has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her Bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham Bid.

Company Name:

Business Address:

Signature:

Name of Signing Official:

Title of Signing Official:

Date:

State of California County of

Company Seal:

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

On this __________ day of _______________before me, ___________________________________________, a Notary Public, personally appeared ____________________________________________,who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the ent ity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature __________________________________ (Seal)

RFB 2026-16

ANNUAL CONTRACT FOR CHEMICAL SUPPLY SERVICES
20 EXHIBIT B-3

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

By submission of a bid, the BIDDER certifies it will comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C., 12101 et. seq., and will maintain compliance throughout the life of this Contract. By commencing performance of the Contract work, the selected BIDDER certifies to the Americans with Disabilities Act compliance.

Company: ______________________________________________ Business Address: ______________________________________________ Signature: ______________________________________________ Name of Signing Official: ______________________________________________ Title of Signing Official: ______________________________________________ Date: ______________________________________________ Company Seal: