2 There are five commonly causal factors that are present in nearly all of firefighter line-of-duty deaths. They are:
• Inadequate communication
• Improper risk assessment
• Lack of incident command
• Lack of accountability
• Lack of, or failure to, follow standard operating procedures (SOPs)
In the past, Hanford Fire Department utilized a UHF (400-500 MHz) system for communicating between radios while Kings County Fire was using a VHF (155.250-155.610 MHz) frequency. The agencies were not able to talk with each other on the radio.
In April of 2013 Hanford Fire switched to a VHF (150-200 MHz) system. This brought the department in line with Kings County Fire and other state operators as mandated by Firescope California Multi-Agency Coordination System (MACS 441-1) Radio Communications Guidelines.
Please see Firescope Radio Communications Guidelines MACS 441-1 https://firescope.caloes.ca.gov/ICS%20Documents/MACS%20441-1.pdf However, the system is still inoperable with Hanford Police and Kings County Sheriff as they use a UHF (460.075-460.600 MHz) single band radio system that requires an encryption piece. They are in need of multi-brand radios.
VHF frequency ranges from 30 to 300 megahertz (MHz) and public safety radios often use 150- 174 MHz. Their signals behave somewhat like a flashlight beam-traveling well in open areas such as wildland areas but reflecting off concrete walls, which can hinder communication inside large commercial buildings. When radio signals encounter obstacles like concrete walls, they can bounce back or become weakened, making it difficult for radios to send or receive messages inside buildings. Firefighters are not able to communicate out to dispatch or talk to each other in the same building or residence.
Residential LED lights/televisions and materials such as aluminum siding, steel framing, metal roofing, foil-backed insulation, radiant barriers, windows-coated with microscopic metallic oxides to reflect heat, poured concrete, cinder blocks, plaster with wire mesh all used in new home construction can severely interfere with, reflect, or absorb radio frequencies—including Wi-Fi, cellular, and emergency signals.
UHF radio frequencies range from 300 MHz to 3 GHz and travel in straight lines meaning they require a clear path between transmitter and receiver (known as line of sight without obstacles) and are blocked by hills or mountains. They penetrate certain materials, such as concrete, making them suitable for use in buildings. UHF and 800 MHz are popular for use in radios, walkie talkies, cordless phones, and Land-Mobile Radio (LMR) for public safety in urban environments.
Please see Appendix A - UHF, VHF, and 800 MHz | The Frequency Differences and Applications
3 Hanford City Fire Department has an auto aid and mutual aid agreement with Kings County Fire.
This means when there is a structure fire in Hanford the Hanford Police Department dispatches via VHF, UHF and potentially 800 MHz to Hanford Fire and Kings County Fire which then comes up on the Hanford Fire VHF channel. A simplex frequency (like a walkie talkie talk) is then assigned after arrival on scene. A simplex frequency is one channel that is used for both transmitting and receiving and is limited to the distance or range between the radios with only one person able to talk at a time. Firefighters on scene are not able to hear dispatches but are able only to talk between each other and Incident Command, because of limited range of their radios. This is an additional concern because only Incident Command is able to talk to both dispatchers and firefighters. This lack of a duplex system where two-way communication is possible simultaneously may and does cause problems for firefighters as this limits first responders’ ability to communicate.
The merging of VHF, UHF , 700 (digital) and 800 (analog) MHz capabilities into a fire department’s communication system is a multi-band approach and is considered the best practice for interoperability and operational flexibility. This is especially helpful for departments that provide mutual aid, operate across diverse jurisdictions, or need both wildland and structural coverage such as Kings County.
The use of modern multi-band radios would prevent “radio juggling” and allows Incident Command to focus on the fire, not communications. This would not only provide clear, consistent audio across varied networks but would allow agencies to operate across frequencies and communicate with neighboring agencies, dispatches, and hospitals regardless of the band they operate on. Merging bands would allow a single radio to act as a bridge between different systems, such as VHF in rural areas, UHF in urban environments and 700/800 MHz of modern trunked systems.
It has been expressed to the Grand Jury that in Kings County a county wide trunking system defined as “a type of radio or network technology that allows multiple users to share a limited pool of frequencies or channels automatically, rather than assigning a dedicated channel to each user group
” would be beneficial to reduce complexity for not only fire departments but also for all emergency responders.
All branches of public safety in Kings County would benefit from collaborating on a trunking system and should do so by means of grants or financing as money is tight, especially for the Kings County. Putting off the designing and planning for a countywide trunking system will only become more outdated and expensive as time goes on. Within the next six months, a commission should be formed by Kings County, Avenal, Corcoran, Hanford, and Lemoore, to compare needs, define responsibilities and determine each agencies contribution. Some departments already have part of the necessary radios and equipment.
4 Methodology (Investigative tech used-research, observations, interviews):
The Grand Jury interviewed members of several Kings County departments and reviewed various sources of information including:
UHF, VHF and 800MHz | The Frequency Differences and Applications https://jkcomm.com/uhf- vhf-and-800mhz-the-frequency-differences-and-applications/
Firescope Governance Groups https://firescope.caloes.ca.gov/Governance/structure-fire- subcommittee
Firescope Radio Communications Guidelines MACS 441-1
https://firescope.caloes.ca.gov/ICS%20Documents/MACS%20441-1.pdf
National Institute Occupational Safety and Health (NIOS) https://www.chelmsfordma.gov/1072/10209/National-Institute-for-Occupational-Safe
Definition of UHF https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra_high_frequency
California Radio Interoperable System (CRIS) https://www.caloes.ca.gov/office-of-the- director/operations/public-safety-communications/radio-communications-branch/california- radio-interoperable-system-cris/
What is a Trunked System https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trunked_radio_system Project 25 Technology Interest Group https://project25.org/index.php/news-events/512-latest- list-of-p25-trunking-systems-now-available-state-by-state
Embracing Interoperability, Spectrum Efficiency and Cost Economies https://www.apcointl.org/technology/interoperability/project-25
Discussion (facts-tells the story):
The Federal Communication Commission assigns all frequencies. The difference between VHF and UHF is as follows:
• VHF 30–300 MHz offers better range with less power and is ideal for long-distance, open outdoor communication.
• UHF 300–3000 MHz is best for city use, penetrating buildings, and 2-way radio. It provides better performance around concrete, steel, and indoor, crowded environments.
There exists in California an organization called Firescope. Firescope is made up of representatives of California firefighting agencies-Kings County has a member within the
5 Hanford Fire Department. Consolidated communications, emergency operations, incident technology, health and safety, special operations, air operations, and training/education is their scope of work. It was established to develop and review Incident Command documents, policies and procedures that are based on best practice models free of political or geographical bias while drawing upon the experience and knowledge gained in the delivery of public service by all of its members. One requirement of the Firescope Statewide VHF channel plan is that all mutual aid responding units must carry at least one Mobile and one Portable VHF radio with a channel capacity of at least 400 channels.
The goal is to enhance emergency response and safety and to keep up with current and future trends and technology in fire services such as merging UHF, VHF, 700 and 800 MHz’s. This would be considered the “gold standard” and offer the best interoperability. The Hanford Fire department has recently purchased sixty duel multi-band radios that can be programed with UHF, 700, and 800 frequencies. For more information on Firescope California please visit:
Firescope Radio Communications Guidelines MACS 441-1
https://firescope.caloes.ca.gov/ICS%20Documents/MACS%20441-1.pdf
The State of California in 2019 introduced the California Radio Interoperable system (CRIS). This was an attempt by the State to leverage the more advanced radio technology available and to put a more robust and effective communication tool in the hands of Californias first responders.
The key feature of the CRIS is Project 25 (P25) compliant trunked radio system which interfaces with similar local systems throughout California. This will provide radio coverage to over 90% of the State’s population and over 60% of the States geographic footprint.
Goals of the CRIS system are as follows:
• Cover the greatest portion of the population
• Reach the broadest geographic footprint
• Maintain the highest network reliability, using advanced network technology • Eliminate the need for a patchwork of multiple smaller systems • Make efficient use of limited radio spectrum
Mission of the CRIS system is “to design and implement a statewide communication system with emphasis on providing interoperable communications between California’s Public Safety Agencies while supporting normal day-to-day safety operations.”
Features of the system would:
• Dedicate “talk groups” and interoperable channels
• Noise reduction
• Encryption
• IP backhaul.
(the high-capacity infrastructure that connects a local network, such as a cellular tower or business office, to a central core network or the internet) • Seamless communication between work groups
6 A trunked radio system (TRS) is a two-way radio system that uses a control channel to automatically assign frequency channels to groups of user radios. Traditionally, a group of users (talk group) with mobile and portable two-way radios communicate over a single shared radio channel. Only one user may talk at a time. Usually there needs to be 40-60 channels so multiple groups in a similar location can communicate at the same time. In this non-trunked system, one must manually select the channel to be used and manually switch all radios to that channel.
This is inefficient and calls for exclusive use of scarce radio channels, regardless of how much or how little the group is transmitting. There is also the possibility that multiple groups would choose the same channel thus causing “crosstalk.”
A trunked radio system presents an advanced alternative where the channel selection is done automatically thus eliminating conflicts and providing efficiency across multiple talk groups.
Think of this as a central radio traffic controller that is handled by a computer system and eliminates intervention when operating the radio by a large number of users. An automatic idle radio channel is found by the system which sends packets of data to enable one talk group to talk together, regardless of frequency. The primary purpose of this type of system is efficiency as many people can carry many conversations over only a few distinct frequencies. (Kern County is going to a UHF, VHF and 800 trunking system.) This type of system is used by many government entities to provide two-way communication for fire departments, police, and other municipal services. Another benefit is that the system can accommodate radio interoperability.
Control Channels
A control channel is a dedicated frequency that a trunked radio system sends data packets to in order to request communication on a specific talk group. The radios will automatically switch to the frequency indicated by the system to monitor the transmission. After the user is finished speaking, the user’s radios return to monitoring the control channel for additional transmissions.
Talk Groups
This is an assigned logical group of users on a trunked radio system which uses a number of frequencies allocated to the entire system. The control channel coordinates the system so talk groups can share these frequencies seamlessly. This dramatically increases the system capacity with optimal use of frequencies.
Fleet Maps and IDs
Talk groups are identified and may be added to as the system matures and new agencies or new requirements are identified. A fleet map is created for various talk groups such as:
• A hospital ER that ambulances interact with
• Communications with dispatches
• Special events or disasters
7 • Air medical transport
• Police and Fire services
Each talk group is assigned a unique digital ID on the system so that the controller can direct transmissions to the radios which are intended to receive them. This could be a fleet of ambulances, police users or firefighters. High priority users such as fire and police would be assigned priority levels sometimes with ‘preemption’ capabilities ensuring that communication between critical units is maintained. Additional layers could include pre-determined lower priority users such as animal control, public works, highways maintenance, correctional services, natural resources, etc. Federal agencies working in the area could also be added as could commercial users which provide assistance to general public safety (sub fleets).
A trunking system dispatch console operator can actually ‘patch’ two talk groups together making a new ‘virtual’ talk group to allow users from different agencies to communicate without having to switch channels. Especially helpful in an emergency situation. In planning a multi-agency (mutual aid or Inter-agency) trunking radio system, each agency is assigned a ‘block’ of talk group IDs based on the number of talk groups they anticipate requiring plus some for future expansion.
Advantages of trunking systems
A trunking radio looks similar to a conventional radio with a channel select switch. However, instead of switching frequencies, it uses internal software to connect to different talk groups.
When a talk group is selected, the radio joins conversations involving that group. This also allows great flexibility in radio usage. The same radio model can be used for many different types of system users such as Police, Fire, Public Works, Animal Control, etc. simply by changing the software programming in the radio itself.
Hanford fire recently purchased sixty new dual band radios that need an encryption app which would allow interoperability with Hanford Police and Kings County Sheriff’s offices. This is an expensive proposition as the cost per radio is $900 for a total of $54,000.
There are multiple federal and state grants to fund trunking radio systems for emergency responders, primarily focusing on improving interoperability and upgrading infrastructure to P25 standards.
• FEMA assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG)
• Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Homeland Security Grant Program
• The Interoperable Emergency Communications Grant Program (IECGP) • Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG): Provides significant funding for communication equipment, including radio systems, supporting 24-month projects
8 • Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP): Funds projects for state, local, and tribal agencies to enhance interoperable communication systems • Interoperable Emergency Communications Grant Program (IECGP): Specifically aimed at improving governance, planning, and equipment for emergency communications • Statewide Emergency Radio Infrastructure Grants: Some states (e.g., Texas) offer dedicated grants specifically for upgrading radio towers and infrastructure • Next Generation Warning System Grant Program: Focuses on enhancing public safety communication systems
P25 develops standards for Interoperable LMR systems so emergency responders can exchange critical communications across agencies and jurisdictions. P25 standardizes interfaces between the various components of the LMR systems emergency responders’ use.
Embracing Interoperability
Spectrum Efficiency and Cost Economies. https://www.apcointl.org/technology/interoperability/project-25/ P25 Compliance: Grantees are strongly encouraged to ensure all systems and equipment purchased are compliant with P25 standards.
• Eligibility: Local, state, territorial, and tribal agencies responsible for emergency services are generally eligible
• System Focus: Funding is geared toward creating, upgrading, or expanding interoperable systems (like 800 MHz trunking) to ensure secure communication
Findings/Recommendations:
F1. Kings County as well as its four cities of Avenal, Corcoran, Hanford, and Lemoore are unable to reliably communicate with other first responders such as sheriff, police departments, out-of- county ambulance providers and state and federal emergency operators. The lack of a duplex system where two-way communication is possible simultaneously, the use of outdated technology, lack of infrastructure in the valley, and incompatible radio frequencies prevents the seamless coordination between agencies during emergencies. This causes delays in resource deployment, prolonged response times, confusion/chaos among agencies, and a higher risk of firefighter injury or death.
F2. It is of the utmost importance that firefighters can easily communicate with each other and with Incident Command during fire emergency situations. According to the National Institute for Occupation Safety and Health (NIOSH) inadequate communications are one of the five most commonly causal factors that are present in nearly all of firefighter line-of-duty deaths.
9 R1/2. The communications systems in Kings County as well as its four cities – Avenal, Corcoran, Hanford, and Lemoore - should be on a universal duplex trunking system, as Kern County is establishing, which accommodates all public safety entities (local and statewide) in an emergency or disaster situation.
F3. Technology does exist to merge Ultra High Frequency, Very High Frequency, 700 MHz, and 800 MHz. Ultra-High Frequency and Very High Frequency are radio frequencies used by emergency services, and the use of a trunking system allows multiple agencies to communicate seamlessly across these frequencies. Kings County, Tulare County and Fresno County are some of the last to trend in this direction.
R3. The establishment of a county-wide trunking system should be a high priority within Kings County. All fire departments countywide and other first responders should be involved in creating a committee/commission to plan, create, coordinate, and implement a unified trunking system to benefit both our emergency responders as well as our citizens. First steps should be taken by October 2026.
REQUIRED RESPONSE
Kings County Board of Supervisors
1400 W. Lacey Boulevard
Hanford, California 93230
Avenal City Council
919 Skyline Boulevard
Avenal, California 93204
Hanford City Council
319 N. Douty Street
Hanford, California 93230
Lemoore City Council
711 W. Cinnamon Drive
Lemoore, California 93245
INVITED RESPONSE
John Chamberlin, Fire Chief
Kings County Fire Department
280 Campus Drive
Hanford, California 93230
10 Jacob McAfee, Fire Chief
Avenal Fire Department
919 Skyline Boulevard
Avenal, California 93204
Daniel Perkins, Fire Chief
Hanford City Fire Department
350 W. Grangeville Boulevard
Hanford, California 93230
David Jones, Fire Chief
Lemoore Volunteer Fire Department
210 Fox Street
Lemoore, California 93245
Requirements and how to respond to a Grand Jury Report
§ 933. Findings and Recommendations (Excerpt)
No later than 90 days after the grand jury submits a final report on the operations of any public agency subject to its reviewing authority, the governing body of the public agency shall comment to the presiding judge of the superior court on the findings and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of the governing body, and every elected county officer or agency head for which the grand jury has responsibility pursuant to Section 914.1 shall comment within 60 days to the presiding judge of the superior court, with an information copy sent to the board of supervisors, on the findings and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of that county officer or agency head and any agency or agencies which that officer or agency head supervises or controls. In any city and county, the mayor shall also comment on the findings and recommendations. All of these comments and reports shall forthwith be submitted to the presiding judge of the superior court who impaneled the grand jury. A copy of all responses to grand jury reports shall be placed on file with the clerk of the public agency and the office of the county clerk, or the mayor when applicable, and shall remain on file in those offices...
As used in this section, “agency” includes a department.
§ 933.05. Responses to Findings (Excerpt)
(a) For purposes of subdivision (b) of Section 933, as to each grand jury finding, the responding person or entity shall indicate one of the following:
11 (1) The respondent agrees with the finding.
(2) The respondent disagrees with wholly or partially with the finding, in which case the response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons therefor.
(b) For purposes of subdivision (b) of Section 933, as to each grand jury’s recommendation, the responding person or entity shall report one of the following actions:
(1) The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action.
(2) The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a time frame for implementation.
(3) The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a time frame for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or head of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency when applicable. This timeframe shall not exceed six months from the date of publication of the grand jury report.
(4) The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation, therefore.
(c) However, if a finding or recommendation of the grand jury addresses budgetary or personnel matters of a county agency or department headed by an elected officer, both the agency or department head and the board of supervisors shall respond if requested by the Grand Jury, but the response of the board of supervisors shall address only those budgetary or personnel matters over which it has some decision making authority. The response of the elected agency or department head shall address all aspects of the findings or recommendations affecting his or her agency or department. …
(f) A grand jury shall provide the affected agency with a copy of the portion of the Grand Jury report relating to that person or entity two working days prior to its public release and after the approval of the presiding judge. No officer, agency, department, or governing body of a public agency shall disclose any contents of the report prior to the public release of the final report. (Emphasis added.)
12 Appendix A
UHF, VHF and 800MHz | The Frequency Differences and Applications Choosing between UHF, VHF, and 800MHz radio frequencies depends on your environment, coverage needs, and industry use.
• VHF is best for long-range outdoor communication.
• UHF performs better in buildings and urban areas.
• 800MHz is commonly used for public safety and large trunked systems.
In this guide, we break down the differences, advantages, and best use cases for each frequency band.
Frequency Best For Range Environment
VHF Outdoor / rural Long Open areas
UHF Indoor / cities Medium Buildings
800MHz Public safety System-based Wide-area networks FCC
Every radio system transmits and receives on a specific radio frequency, called the operating frequency. Allocation and regulation of radio frequencies are supervised by specific government agencies in each country with the result that allowable (legal) frequencies and frequency bands differ from country to country. In addition to frequency, these government agencies typically specify other aspects of the equipment itself, including allowable transmitter power, maximum deviation, spurious emissions, etc.
Use of the radio frequency bands in the United States is regulated by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC). Certain frequencies within each band have been designated for use by radios as well as by other services. In the United States, the frequencies used for these systems may be grouped into four general bands or ranges: low-band VHF (49-108 MHz), high-band VHF (169- 216 MHz), low-band UHF (450-806 MHz), and high-band UHF (900-952 MHz). VHF represents “Very High Frequency” while UHF represents “Ultra High Frequency.” The FCC also determines who can operate in each band and who has priority if more than one user is operating. Primary users include licensed radio/television broadcasters and commercial communications services such as 2-way radio, pagers, and cellular telephones. Radio system users are always considered to be secondary users. In general, priority is given to primary users.
Secondary users may not interfere with primary users, but secondary users may be subject to interference from primary users.
13 VHF
“Very high frequency” is commonly used for FM radio broadcast, two-way land mobile radio systems, long-range data communication, and marine communications, to name a few. Except for assistive listening systems, low-band VHF is not recommended for serious applications. Due to a large number of primary and secondary users, plus high levels of general radio frequency (RF) “noise,” this band is prone to interference from many sources. Transmitter power is limited to less than 50 megawatts, except in the 72-76 MHz range where up to 1 watt is allowed for assistive listening systems. Finally, the minimum proper antenna size for units in this range can be over three feet long (1/4 wavelength), which can severely limit portability and/or efficiency.
In the U.S., the high-band VHF range is divided into two bands available to radio users. The first band, from 169 – 172 MHz, includes eight specific frequencies designated by the FCC for radio use by the public. These frequencies are often referred to as “traveling frequencies,” because they can theoretically be used throughout the U.S. without concern for interference from broadcasting networks.
The possibility of interference from other secondary users and general RF noise exists, but it is much less than that for low-band VHF frequencies. Additionally, although this range includes the primary users of television channels 7 – 13, there are ample frequencies available, i.e., locally unused television channels, in almost any part of the U.S.
UHF
Like the VHF region, the UHF region contains several bands that are used for radio systems.
However, certain physical, regulatory, and economic differences between VHF and UHF regions should be noted here. The primary physical characteristic of UHF radio waves is their much shorter wavelength of 12 inches to 24 inches. The most apparent result of this is the much shorter length of antennas for UHF radio systems. One less obvious consequence is reduced radio wave propagation, both through the air and other non-metallic materials, such as walls and organic matter. This results in potentially less transmitting range for comparable radiated power. Another consequence is the increased amount of radio wave reflections by smaller metal objects, resulting in comparatively more frequent and more severe interference due to multi-path dropouts.
The UHF frequencies are typically paired to provide a duplex pair for repeater operation thus giving much greater range radio to radio than possible without a repeater. There are repeaters in the VHF band as well, but the cost of duplexers and the limited availability of frequencies tilts the scale towards UHF. Since UHF tends to be more line of sight with fewer reflections of the wave from atmospheric changes, repeater systems can share frequencies at closer distances than VHF repeater systems.
700/800MHz
The 700/800 MHz frequency band is a portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, or frequency band, which encompasses 790–862 MHz. Public safety radio systems (such as those used by police, firefighters, and emergency medical technicians) operate in several portions of the 800
14 MHz band, which consists of spectrum at 806-824 MHz paired with spectrum at 851-869 MHz.
The 800 MHz band is also home to commercial wireless carriers and private radio systems.
To address a growing problem of harmful interference to 800 MHz public safety communication systems caused by high-density commercial wireless systems, the FCC, in July 2004, adopted a comprehensive plan to reconfigure the band. This plan was designed to protect the lives of first responders and other emergency personnel and fulfills the Commission’s obligation to promote safety of life and property through the use of wire and radio communications. So, the commercial wireless carriers were segregated from Public Safety and Industrial users in a process known as rebanding. Also, in 2012, the US Congress enacted legislation to provide spectrum for public safety users in two separate 700 blocks of frequencies. One block consists of paired frequencies in the 758-763 Mhz and 788-793Mhz bands for use in a broadband nationwide network called FirstNet. This would provide data, voice, geo-location, and other enhanced services to first responders as the network is built out. The other block of paired frequencies were allocated to public safety for use in frequency efficient systems for local and statewide communications systems, i.e., P25 trunking systems.
Even though the range is lessened in the 700/800 bands, there are ways to extend the coverage with a sophisticated system equipped with multiple transmitter and receiver sites working in conjunction to provide a wide area of communications coverage. In all frequency ranges, there are new digital modulation schemes and trunking systems that allow much better coverage and much better spectrum efficiency. From Moto-turbo to NXDN, to P25 systems, there are many ways to gain spectrum efficiency and a more consistent communications path for the men and women that put their health and safety on the line to protect and serve the general population.
Many of these same systems are used to provide commercial and business communications systems to provide cost advantages, efficiencies, and safety for their employees and customers.
In the end, there is no one solution to fit every need. Your communications system has to be tailored to fit your needs and budget.
12.F.
AGENDA
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: 8/4/2026 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR
SUBJECT:
Approval of the purchase of sixty-five (65) rifles and required accessories from Proforce Law Enforcement for $147,715.91 from the General Fund as approved in the Capital Improvement Program for fiscal year 2026/2027.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommendation: That the City Council, by motion, approve the purchase of sixty-five (65) rifles and required accessories from Proforce Law Enforcement for $147,715.91 from the General Fund as approved in the Capital Improvement Program for fiscal year 2026/2027.
Recommended Motion: I move to approve the purchase of sixty-five (65) rifles and required accessories from Proforce Law Enforcement for $147,715.91 from the General Fund as approved in the Capital Improvement Program for fiscal year 2026/2027.
BACKGROUND:
The Police Department is requesting to purchase sixty-five (65) Geissele rifles from Proforce Law Enforcement to replace the department's current rifle inventory for all sworn staff. The department's current rifle inventory is nearing the end of its planned service life. Approximately ninety (90) percent of the department's rifles are utilizing barrels that are nearly eighteen (18) years old. Each rifle in the current inventory has experienced extensive operation and training use, which has required an increase in maintenance and replacement parts to maintain reliability.
Replacing the department's patrol rifle inventory will improve operational reliability while establishing a standardized rifle platform for all sworn personnel. Standardizing the patrol rifle inventory will improve training consistency, simplify armorer maintenance, reduce the inventory of replacement parts, and improve long-term maintenance efficiency.
Department staff conducted extensive testing and evaluation of multiple patrol rifle platforms before selecting the proposed Geissele rifles. Based on performance, reliability, manufacturing quality, and manufacturer support, the Geissele platform was determined to provide the best overall value for the department's operational needs.
Staff solicited quotes from Proforce Law Enforcement and L C Action Police Supply for sixty-five (65) Geissele patrol rifles and necessary accessories for each rifle, such as slings, sights, and suppressors. Both vendors are the only direct suppliers of the rifle platform; other vendors purchase the rifles through either Proforce or L C Action and resell them to the City. For this reason, staff was only able to solicit two (2) quotes. Proforce Law Enforcement provided the lowest overall pricing and
is offering the department a trade-in credit for the current rifle inventory to offset the overall purchase cost. Proforce Law Enforcement provided a total quote of $147,715.91.
The rifle replacement project is an approved fiscal year 2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) purchase. As part of the FY 2026/2027 Mid-Cycle Budget Review approved by the City Council on June 16, 2026, an additional $22,210 was appropriated from the General Fund to the rifle replacement CIP to support the replacement of all the department's rifle inventory. When soliciting up-to-date quotes, Proforce informed the department that the total cost of the required accessories had increased by $505.91 compared to the previous quote staff had obtained. The remaining balance of $505.91 will be absorbed within the Police Department's operating budget.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The previously approved Capital Improvement Program for fiscal year 2027 currently has a total budget of $147,210 for the rifle replacement project. The remaining $505.91 is to be absorbed within the Police Department's operating budget. Following the application of the trade-in value of the department's existing patrol rifle inventory, the total purchase amount from Proforce Law Enforcement is $147,715.91.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Proforce Rifle Quote
2. LC Action Rifle Quote
3. Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 26-27
4. General Fund- Detail of Changes
1088 N FIRST STREET
SAN JOSE CA 95112 Date Jul-20-2026
TEL: 408 294-2677 • FAX 408 294-6444
EMAIL: [email protected]
STATE OF CA SBE CERTIFICATION # 1017260
CUST#
QTY. PRICE TOTAL
65 1557.11 101212.15
1 8350.00 8350.00
0.00 31 -25.00 -775.00
8 -250.00 -2000.00
12 -400.00 -4800.00
15 -475.00 -7125.00
4 -200.00 -800.00
1 -600.00 -600.00
2 -300.00 -600.00
3 -400.00 -1200.00
4 -475.00 -1900.00
1 -200.00 -200.00
Notes: $89,562.15
0.00 $89,562.15
LC ACTION POLICE SUPPLY
SUBTOTAL
SHIPPING
TERMS
KYLE MILLER
F.O.B.
Ship To:
TOTAL
TRADE IN SMITH & WESSON MP15 14.5" COMPLETE RIFLE SEMI-AUTO EST. DELIVERY
DESCRIPTION
GEISSELE 08-522B SUPER DUTY MOD1 11.5" 5.56 SBR BLACK SEMI-AUTO SALES TAX ON NEW ITEM SUBTOTAL @ 8.25%
TRADE IN AMMO DOG AR-15 COMPLETE SEMI-AUTO VARYING BARREL LENGTHS TRADE IN BUSHMASTER XM15 COMPLETE RIFLE SEMI-AUTO VARYING BARRELS NET 30
QUOTED BY
TRADE IN SIG SAUER M400 COMPLETE RIFLE SEMI-AUTO 16"
TRADE IN DPMS RIFLE SEMI-AUTO VARYING BARRELS
TRADE IN COLT AR15/M4 RIFLES COMPLETE SEMI-AUTO VARYING BARRELS TRADE IN SIG SAUER 716 COMPELTE RIFLE SEMI-ATUO
TRADE IN HK MP5SD, PARTS ONLY VALUE
TRADE IN REMINGTON 700
TRADE IN DANIEL DEFENSE MK18 & DDM4 RIFLES SEMI-AUTO VARYING BARRELS To:
JASON GUSTIN
HANFORD POLICE DEPT
PH: (559) 381-8970
EM: [email protected]
QUOTATION
QUOTE VALID THROUGH 9/1/26
1088 N FIRST STREET
SAN JOSE CA 95112 Date Jul-20-2026
TEL: 408 294-2677 • FAX 408 294-6444
EMAIL: [email protected]
STATE OF CA SBE CERTIFICATION # 1017260
CUST#
QTY. PRICE TOTAL
65 840.00 54600.00
65 23.75 1543.75
65 35.64 2316.60
65 49.16 3195.40
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Notes: $61,655.75
8.250%
5086.60
0.00 $66,742.35
LC ACTION POLICE SUPPLY
SUBTOTAL
SALES TAX RATE
SALES TAX
SHIPPING
TERMS
KYLE MILLER
F.O.B.
Ship To:
TOTAL
EST. DELIVERY
DESCRIPTION
HUXWRX FLOW 556K SUPPRESSOR BLACK
MAGPUL MAG1166 MBUS 3 FRONT FLIP SIGHT POLYMER
MAGPUL MAG1167 MBUS 3 REAR FLIP SIGHT POLYMER
MAGPUL MS3 SLING QD SLING GEN2 MAG515
NET 30
QUOTED BY
To:
JASON GUSTIN
HANFORD POLICE DEPT
PH: (559) 381-8970
EM: [email protected]
QUOTATION
QUOTE VALID THROUGH 9/1/26
G= Contingent on Grant Funding
M-F= Multi-Funded
CITY OF HANFORD
Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2026-2027
Fund Fund Name Project # Request Title Project Total Historical FY2026 FY2027 0001 General Fund
822649 G HEROES PARK 11,947,892 3,747,892
NEW G M-F GRADE SEPARATION DESIGN 1,656,000 676,000 980,000 NEW G M-F GRANGEVILLE BLVD AT 9TH AVE ROUNDABOUT 5,181,880 340,780 386,100 NEW AGRICULTURAL MITIGATION PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT 200,000 200,000 NEW FIRE ENGINE 42 EQUIPMENT PURCHASE 170,000 170,000
NEW M-F COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REMODEL 150,000 150,000
NEW G M-F 12TH AVE AT HAYDEN AVE 821,364 107,664 713,700 NEW AUTO EXTRICATION EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 270,000 90,000 NEW SEPARATE ELECTRIC SERVICE FROM COURTHOUSE TO BASTILLE (DUE TO SALE) 80,000 80,000 NEW EVIDENCE 3D SCANNING MACHINE 75,000 75,000
823602 G M-F VETERANS BUILDING REHAB 709,530 58,530 651,000 NEW ADA PARKS/RECREATION MODIFICATIONS 133,500 44,500
NEW ROMEO X SIGHTS 29,560 29,560
NEW GENERATOR - CIVIC AUDITORIUM (PUBLIC SAFETY RADIOS) 20,000 20,000 NEW SNIPER NIGHT VISION 18,800 18,800
NEW LESS LETHAL SHOTGUNS 16,000 16,000
NEW M-F UTILITY TRUCK FOR USA POSITION 10,750 10,750
NEW M-F PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING REMODEL 48,000 5,500 42,500 NEW M-F EQUIPMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTORS AND USA POSITION 3,000 3,000 NEW G FAST TRACK HANFORD: HIGH SPEED RAIL CONNECTIVITY & HISTORIC DOWNTOWN 15,523,000 500,000 NEW M-F CITY HALL GENERATOR/ RPL 379, SUPPORTS EOC 200,000 200,000 NEW G ITS PLAN 183,000 183,000
NEW FIRE ENGINE 41 EQUIPMENT PURCHASE 170,000 170,000 NEW RIFLE REPLACEMENT 125,000 125,000
NEW IN CAR CAMERAS 241,680 120,840
NEW GENERATOR - PAL BUILDING DISASTER RECOVERY 20,000 20,000 NEW DRONE PROGRAM EXPANSION 69,000 19,000
Total 0001 General Fund 38, 072,956 3,747,892 2,096,084 4,111,140 0004 Accumulated Capital Outlay
821611/822609 YAC CONCESSION BLDG RESTORATION 305,541 305,541 820634 CITY HALL SECURITY PROJECT 46,495 46,495
Total 0004 Accumulated Capital Outlay 352,036 352,036 0 0 0011 Measure H Capital
NEW MEASURE H: PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING 48,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 NEW MEASURE H: ROAD REHABILITATION AND PAVEMENT PRESERVATION 36,900,000 6,000,000 6,180,000 NEW MEASURE H: FIRE COMMUNICATIONS UPDATE PROJECT 849,000 849,000 NEW MEASURE H: EIGHT (8) NEW POLICE VEHICLES & UPFITTING FOR NEW SWORN STAFF 2,120,000 848,000 NEW MEASURE H: FIRE STATION #4 8,720,000 600,000 295,000 NEW MEASURE H: EXISTING PARKS ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS 1,695,000 280,000 283,000 NEW MEASURE H: EXISTING PARKS ADDITIONAL MAINTENANCE 970,000 160,000 162,000 NEW MEASURE H: CITY OWNED BUILDING MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1,650,000 151,000 299,000 NEW MEASURE H: TWO (2) COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER VEHICLES 290,000 130,000 NEW MEASURE H: TWO (2) PARK MAINTENANCE VEHICLES 120,000 120,000 NEW MEASURE H: TWO (2) CODE ENFORCEMENT VEHICLES 120,000 120,000 NEW MEASURE H: COMMUNITY CLEANUP AND ABATEMENT FOR CODE COMPLIANCE 600,000 100,000 100,000 NEW MEASURE H: FIRE STATION IMPROVEMENTS/EQUIPMENT 600,000 100,000 100,000 NEW MEASURE H: FIRE ENGINE 1,200,000 1,200,000
G= Contingent on Grant Funding
M-F= Multi-Funded
CITY OF HANFORD
Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2026-2027
Fund Fund Name Project # Request Title Project Total Historical FY2026 FY2027 NEW MEASURE H: FIRE LADDER TRUCK 2,400,000
Total 0011 Measure H 106,234,000 0 15,458,000 15,619,000 0044 Gas Tax
823618 PAVEMENT RESURFACING TREATMENT 1,135,617 1,135,617 823615 STREET DIVISION MAINTENANCE 3,187,500 637,500 425,000 425,000 823644 GRADE SEP FEASBLTY/GRGVL (MATCHING FUNDS) 302,801 302,801 825605 M-F RECONSTRUCTION-GARNER AVE FROM LACEY TO GOLETA WAY 100,000 100,000 823614 NEW SIDEWALK/ADA IMPROVEMENTS 410,968 50,968 60,000 60,000 825604 CITY STANDARD PLANS AND SPECS UPDATE 40,000 40,000 NEW ANNUAL INTERSECTION UPGRADES 612,000 153,000
NEW M-F STREETS DEPT ASPHALT PATCH TRUCK /RPL 135 131,207 131,207 NEW PLACE LANDSCAPE BARK IN CENTER MEDIANS 165,000 55,000 NEW M-F HARRIS STREET ABANDONMENT AT COE PARK 95,925 45,000 50,925 NEW M-F STREETS DEPT ROLLER/ RPL 182 23,473 23,473
NEW CENTER MEDIAN ON HANFORD ARMONA WEST OF 11TH AVE - DMV 206,861 40,000 NEW STREETS DEPT TILT TRAILER 30,000 30,000
Total 0044 Gas Tax 6,441,352 2,266,886 892,680 605,925
0045 RMRA
824620 LACEY WIDEN/RECON/10TH-SIERRA P#2 750,000 750,000 823619 LACEY WIDEN/RECON/10TH-SIERR
A 2,196,500 2,196,500
Total 0045 RMRA 2,946,500 2,946,500 0 0
0050 T D A - Transportation
823619 LACEY WIDEN/RECON/10TH-SIERRA 1,356,500 1,356,500 825605 M-F RECONSTRUCTION-GARNER AVE FROM LACEY TO GOLETA WAY 515,647 515,647 823613 SIDEWALK/MISC CONCRETE REPAIRS 376,408 76,408 60,000 60,000 NEW VIDEO DETECTION DEVICES (30) 690,000 690,000
NEW ZINC BLUE BACKUPS (50) 730,000 365,000 365,000
NEW RRFB CROSSWALKS RADAR SIGNS AT MULTIPLE LOCATIONS 352,481 352,481 NEW MALL DR CIR FROM 12TH AVE TO LACEY BLVD. 1,794,277 300,000 1,494,277 NEW REPLACE AC SIDEWALK ON FLINT AVE BETWEEN 11TH AVE AND JOSHUA ST 253,701 253,701 NEW CENTENNIAL DR CIR FROM LACEY BLVD TO MARRIT ST 1,071,160 178,527 892,633 NEW G M-F GRADE SEPARATION DESIGN 414,000 169,000 245,000 NEW COBALT CONTROLLERS (31) 131,750 131,750
NEW INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED STREET SIGNS (16) 111,200 111,200 824607 GRANGEVILLE BLVD. - COMPLETE SIDEWALK BETWEEN DOUTY ST AND HARRIS ST 108,900 108,900 NEW RADAR FEEDBACK SIGNS (22) 99,000 99,000
NEW CAMPUS DR. CIR FROM LACEY BLVD TO 6TH ST 582,116 97,019 485,097 825606 GRANGEVILLE MEDIAN AND CROSSWALKS FROM HARRIS TO KENSINGTON 592,794 95,201 497,593 NEW M-F 9TH AVE ST FRONTAGE AT HEROES PARK 2,618,306 90,639 158,639 NEW SPEED STUDY UPDATE (EVERY 5 YEARS) 187,000 85,000
NEW FEASIBILITY STUDY - PROTECTED BIKE LANES ON DOUTY ST 160,000 85,000 NEW FIRE STATION 3 SIGNAL PREEMTION DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 685,000 70,000 NEW RFB CROSSWALKS/SIGNS 137,000 68,500 68,500
NEW E BIKE CHARGING STATIONS - DOWNTOWN 325,000 55,000
NEW GRANGEVILLE BLVD. FROM MUSTANG TO WELL TANK 6 477,004 47,582 55,332 NEW G M-F 12TH AVE AT HAYDEN AVE 205,341 26,916 178,425
G= Contingent on Grant Funding
M-F= Multi-Funded
CITY OF HANFORD
Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2026-2027
Fund Fund Name Project # Request Title Project Total Historical FY2026 FY2027 823618 PAVEMENT RESURFACING TREATMENT 4,875,000 975,000 NEW RODGERS RD AT 11TH AVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADE 179,133 179,133 NEW SIGN MANUFACTURING PROGRAM 50,000 50,000
Total 0050 T D A - Transportation 19,078,718 1,948,555 3,540,416 5,704,629 0055 CMAQ
823619 LACEY WIDEN/RECON/10TH-SIERR
A 568,912 568,912
820644 TRAF SIGNAL/12TH AV TO HUME 357,000 357,000
822645 9TH AVE & LACEY SIGNAL 148,832 23,332 125,500
NEW G M-F ANNUAL INTERSECTION SIGNALIZATION PROJECT 303,807 43,807 260,000 NEW G M-F 12TH AT HOUSTON SIGNAL AND 12TH FROM BUTTERFIELD TO HOUSTON 415,275 35,377 45,011 Total 0055 CMAQ 1,793,826 949,244 204,684 305,011
0058 ARPA
821611/822609 YAC CONCESSION BLDG RESTORATION 1,282,446 1,282,446 823647 ARPA HIDDEN VALLEY PARK CONCEPTUAL PLAN 69,400 69,400 Total 0058 ARPA 1,351,846 1,351,846 0 0
0161 12th Ave Sewer Benefit AD
823628 12TH AVE SEWER TRUNK MAIN OVERSIZING 203,911 203,911 Total 0161 12th Ave Sewer Benefit AD 203,911 203,911 0 0 0180 Parks Facility Impact Fees
822649 G HEROES PARK - GF 1,788,858 1,788,858
823609 PARK DEV OVERSIZING REQUIREMNT 600,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 825607 M-F INDOOR MULTI-GENERATIONAL FACILITY 5,853,610 53,610 825612 M-F CITY'S DEV IMPACT FEES UPDATE 13,200 13,200
NEW M-F HARRIS STREET ABANDONMENT AT COE PARK 95,925 45,000 50,925 NEW M-F DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT 5,021,000 21,000 1,000,000 Total 0180 Parks Facility Impact Fees 13,372, 593 2,005,668 216,000 1,200,925 0181 Transportation Impact Fees
823619 LACEY WIDEN/RECON/10TH-SIERR
A 2,356,438 2,356,438
820644 TRAF SIGNAL/12TH AV TO HUME 1,487,269 1,487,269
822645 9TH AVE & LACEY SIGNAL 998,197 998,197
820640 12TH AVE SPRINGCREST TO HUME 606,700 472,057 134,643 823616 UNSCH ARTERIAL UPGR/TRAF SIGNL 1,800,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 825604 CITY STANDARD PLANS AND SPECS UPDATE 80,000 80,000 825612 M-F CITY'S DEV IMPACT FEES UPDATE 13,200 13,200
NEW M-F DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT 5,000,000 1,000,000 800,000 NEW CONSTRUCT 9TH AVE. ACROSS UPRR WITH RAILROAD CROSSING 2,374,546 421,146 82,100 NEW CONSTRUCTION OF 9TH AVE BETWEEN E. LACEY AND GRANGEVILLE 11,433,162 328,916 250,000 NEW G M-F 12TH AT HOUSTON SIGNAL AND 12TH FROM BUTTERFIELD TO HOUSTON 1,661,100 141,506 180,045 NEW 9TH AVE. N OF LELAND WAY ALIGNMENT STUDY 120,000 120,000 NEW G M-F GRANGEVILLE BLVD AT 9TH AVE ROUNDABOUT 706,620 46,470 52,650 NEW CONSTRUCT FLORINDA STREET FROM 9 1/4 AVE TO 9TH AVE 8,913,556 754,134 NEW G M-F ANNUAL INTERSECTION SIGNALIZATION PROJECT 1,215,228 175,228
G= Contingent on Grant Funding
M-F= Multi-Funded
CITY OF HANFORD
Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2026-2027
Fund Fund Name Project # Request Title Project Total Historical FY2026 FY2027 NEW M-F PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 100,000 50,000
Total 0181 Transportation Impact Fees 38,866,016 5,857,161 2,642,681 2,794,157 0182 Fire Protection Impact Fee
825612 M-F CITY'S DEV IMPACT FEES UPDATE 13,200 13,200
Total 0182 Fire Protection Impact Fee 13,200 13,200 0 0 0183 Police Protection Impact Fee
825612 M-F CITY'S DEV IMPACT FEES UPDATE 13,200 13,200
Total 0183 Police Protection Impact Fee 13,200 13,200 0 0 0184 Storm Drain Impact Fee
825611 UTILITY MASTER PLAN UPDATE 339,474 339,474
823624 HOUSTON AV PIPELIN/SAND SLOUGH 50,377 50,377
824604 CENTENNIAL DR STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS SOUTH OF BERKSHIRE LN 24,000 24,000 825612 M-F CITY'S DEV IMPACT FEES UPDATE 13,200 13,200
NEW 10 1/2 AVE AND HOUSTON AVE SD PIPE TO HOUSTON 1,877,200 208,200 39,100 NEW HAYDEN ST. EAST OF 12TH AVE. - REGIONAL BASIN 2,532,975 148,200 46,200 NEW ACQUISITION AND CONST OF REGIONAL STORM BASIN AT GRAGEVILLE AT SH43 2,709,410 126,200 NEW RELOCATION OF MALL OR HANSEN BASIN 4,983,000 30,000 NEW M-F PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 100,000 50,000
Total 0184 Storm Drain Impact Fee 12,629,636 427,051 512,600 135,300 0185 Water System Impact Fee
825611 UTILITY MASTER PLAN UPDATE 210,433 210,433
825612 M-F CITY'S DEV IMPACT FEES UPDATE 13,200 13,200
NEW M-F DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT 3,240,000 740,000 500,000 NEW NEW GROUNDWATER WELLS (W5, W9, W1) 26,878,000 708,400 NEW 3RD AND HANFORD MARKET PLACE WATER MAIN & WELL 4,131,800 387,300 161,600 NEW M-F NEW WATER TANK RESERVOIR #6B 3,750,000 250,000
NEW M-F SEWER & WATER TRUNKLINE UTIL IN 9TH AVE BETWEEN E. LACEY & GRANGEVILLE 3,000,997 149,475 NEW ANNUAL WATER MASTER PLAN CIP PROJECT 6,275,140 217,793 NEW CONSTRUCT FLORINDA STREET FROM 9 1/4 AVE TO 9TH AVE 1,451,044 122,766 NEW M-F PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 100,000 50,000
Total 0185 Water System Impact Fee 49,050,614 223,633 2,235,175 1,052,159 0186 Wastewater Impact Fee
825609 WWTP 3RD INTERNAL LIFT ADDITION 1,433,209 1,383,209 50,000 825611 UTILITY MASTER PLAN UPDATE 240,883 240,883
825612 M-F CITY'S DEV IMPACT FEES UPDATE 13,200 13,200
NEW ANNUAL SEWER MASTER PLAN CIP PROJECT 8,352,866 343,701 NEW M-F DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT 1,800,000 300,000 300,000 NEW M-F SEWER & WATER TRUNKLINE UTIL IN 9TH AVE BETWEEN E. LACEY & GRANGEVILLE 4,267,219 212,543 NEW M-F PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 100,000 50,000
Total 0186 Wastewater Impact Fee 16,207,377 1,637,292 906,244 350,000
G= Contingent on Grant Funding
M-F= Multi-Funded
CITY OF HANFORD
Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2026-2027
Fund Fund Name Project # Request Title Project Total Historical FY2026 FY2027 0187 Refuse/Recycle Impact Fee
825612 M-F CITY'S DEV IMPACT FEES UPDATE 13,200 13,200
Total 0187 Refuse/Recycle Impact Fee 13,200 13,200 0 0
0301 Airport Capital
NEW REPLACE 70 FT OF SEWER LINE AT THE AIRPORT FBO BUILDING 16,386 16,386 NEW M-F AIRPORT TRUCK (EV)/ RPL 63 40,366 40,366
Total 0301 Airport Capital 56,752 0 56,752 0
0307 Refuse
825303 FRONT LOAD REFUSE TRUCK (NEW) 450,000 450,000
823307 FRONT LOAD REFUSE TRUCK (NEW) 370,080 370,080
824001 COMMERCIAL/RECYCLE/ORG DUMPSTERS 1,144,119 264,119 440,000 440,000 822606 REFUSE OFFICE BREAKROOM 223,504 223,504
823308 REFUSE SCALES/NEW 160,000 125,000
824002 AUTOMATED REFUSE CONTAINERS 647,340 103,340 272,000 272,000 824303 REFUSE SERVICE TRUCK (NEW) 75,000 75,000
824605 M-F CITY REFUSE ENCLOSURES REBUILD (13) LOCATIONS 586,966 75,000 825008 REFUSE CAMERA SYSTEM 149,000 50,000
825604 CITY STANDARD PLANS AND SPECS UPDATE 10,000 10,000 825001 G REFUSE SOLAR COMPACTORS (GRANT FUNDED) 96,000 16,000 16,000 NEW M-F PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING REMODEL 15,993 1,833 14,161 Total 0307 Refuse 3,928,002 1,746,043 729,833 742,161
0340 Building Safety
NEW COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REMODEL (MULTI-FUNDED) 460,000 460,000 NEW ELECTRIC VAN FOR SENIOR BUILDING INSPECTOR 62,200 62,200 NEW ELECTRIC VAN FOR BUILDING INSPECTOR 62,200 62,200
Total 0340 Building Safety 584,400 0 584,400 0
0359 Storm Drain
823619 LACEY WIDEN/RECON/10TH-SIERR
A 792,230 792,230
825602 DOWNTOWN FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS 1,312,650 488,400 823624 HOUSTON AV PIPELIN/SAND SLOUGH 463,852 463,852
825301 VACUUM TRUCK (REPL 174) 453,880 453,880
822621 TREE TRIM/REMOVAL PROGRAM 373,400 73,400 75,000 75,000 823621 INCR FLOW CAP/PEOPLE DITCH 60,704 60,704
825604 CITY STANDARD PLANS AND SPECS UPDATE 30,000 30,000 823620 CURB AND GUTTER INSTALL 157,682 22,682 45,000 45,000 NEW BASIN 55 LAND ACQUISITION 450,000 450,000
NEW ANNUAL STORM DRAIN IMP PROJECT 4,068,700 168,800
NEW PLEASANT SOUTH OF GREENFIELD - STORMDRAIN 425,473 55,789 369,684 NEW LIFT STATION REHAB 100,000 50,000
NEW M-F UTILITY TRUCK FOR USA POSITION 10,750 10,750
NEW M-F EQUIPMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTORS AND USA POSITION 7,500 7,500 NEW M-F PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING REMODEL 16,003 1,834 14,170 NEW LIFT STATION 31 UPGRADE 5,945,000 215,000
NEW MS4 PERMIT - ANNUAL PROJECT 487,718 90,200
G= Contingent on Grant Funding
M-F= Multi-Funded
CITY OF HANFORD
Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2026-2027
Fund Fund Name Project # Request Title Project Total Historical FY2026 FY2027 NEW EIGHTH ST AT IRWIN ST STORM DRAIN 1,445,000 20,000
NEW M-F CHINA ALLEY - UTILITY REPLACEMENT /RECONSTRUCTION 187,500 15,000 Total 0359 Storm Drain 16,788,042 2,385,148 864,673 844,054 0362 WWTP/Sewe r
825019 WWTF SWITCHGEAR 400,000 400,000
823619 LACEY WIDEN/RECON/10TH-SIERR A 399,280 399,280
825304 PICKUP TRUCK (NEW) 65,000 65,000
824302 PICKUP TRUCK (NEW) UNIT 109 64,855 64,855
825011 SPARE MOTOR SCREW PUMP 40,000 40,000
822627 PROTECTIVE GRATING 27,142 27,142
825604 CITY STANDARD PLANS AND SPECS UPDATE 20,000 20,000 824621 DESIGN & CONST OF SCE-OWNED FACILITY 13,038 13,038 823627 SEWER SYSTEM VIDEO INSP 10,953 10,953
NEW ANNUAL SEWER MAINT. IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 4,551,188 223,300 NEW LIFT STATION REHABILITATION 1,120,150 165,000 173,250 NEW SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE RECOATING 679,500 100,000 105,000 NEW CCTV INSPECTION SERVICES 408,200 60,000 63,000
NEW M-F WWTP TRUCK (EV)/ RPL 334 40,546 40,546
NEW STORAGE POND FENCING 40,250 40,250
NEW SLUDGE LAGOON DREDGE PUMP REPLACEMENT 40,000 40,000 NEW SPARE BARSCREEN MOTOR 40,000 40,000
NEW PLANT HEADWORKS MCC ROOM A/C REPLACEMENT 35,000 35,000 NEW COLLECTION LIFT STATION PUMP REPLACEMENT 222,500 32,500 34,100 NEW SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE ROACH CONTROL 170,050 25,000 26,250 NEW CHLORINE INJECTION MANIFOLD REBUILD 25,000 25,000
NEW COLLECTION PORTABLE INSPECTION CAMER
A 15,000 15,000
NEW EFFLUENT PUMP STATION VALVE REHAB 15,000 15,000
NEW M-F UTILITY TRUCK FOR USA POSITION 10,750 10,750
NEW COLLECTION STORAGE UNIT 10,000 10,000
NEW M-F EQUIPMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTORS AND USA POSITION 7,500 7,500 NEW INTERNAL LIFT PUMP TUBE #1 1,050,000 1,050,000
NEW M-F CHINA ALLEY - UTILITY REPLACEMENT /RECONSTRUCTION 375,000 30,000 Total 0362 WWTP/Sewe
r 9,895,902 1,040,268 884,846 1,481,600
0391 Wate r
825600 BADGER METER REPLACEMENT 16,526,600 16,526,600
823640 M-F INDUSTRIAL PARK WATER STORAGE 7,595,846 7,595,846 823637 NEW WATER SUPPLY WELL 51 & 52 3,194,504 3,194,504 823619 LACEY WIDEN/RECON/10TH-SIERR
A 950,660 950,660
822634 WATER SYS SECURITY UPGRADES 615,740 615,740
825608 WELL MEDIA FILTRATION 1,500,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 824609 WELL PUMP REHAB/WELL 42 AND WELL 38 220,000 120,000 100,000 823635 METER REPAIR/REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 1,019,585 119,585 100,000 200,000 825604 CITY STANDARD PLANS AND SPECS UPDATE 20,000 20,000 822635 WATER MAIN REPL PROGRAM 1,400,000 700,000
NEW G INDUSTRIAL PARK WATER MAIN LOOP AND 500K GAL TANK 5,177,994 606,552 4,571,442 NEW ANNUAL WATER INFRASTRUCTURE MAINT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 9,774,600 236,600 2,864,000 NEW REPLACE CHLORINE PUMPS CITYWIDE 140,000 70,000 70,000 NEW WATER DEPT. TRUCK/ RPL 58 64,329 64,329
G= Contingent on Grant Funding
M-F= Multi-Funded
CITY OF HANFORD
Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2026-2027
Fund Fund Name Project # Request Title Project Total Historical FY2026 FY2027 NEW PURCHASE TWO REPLACEMENT WELL MOTORS 60,000 60,000
NEW WATER DEPT. TRUCK (EV)/ RPL 75 58,366 58,366
NEW WATER DEPT. TRUCK (EV)/ RPL 69 58,366 58,366
NEW TANK 4 BOOSTER PUMP(S) UPGRADE 50,000 50,000
NEW M-F WATER DEPT. TRUCK 1-TON/ RPL 97 40,781 40,781
NEW M-F REPLACE GENERATOR TO WELL #35 AT FIRE STATION NO.1 / RPL 323 25,727 25,727 NEW M-F 9TH AVE ST FRONTAGE AT HEROES PARK 654,577 22,660 39,660 NEW ANNUAL WELL INSPECTION 96,000 16,000 16,000
NEW M-F UTILITY TRUCK FOR USA POSITION 10,750 10,750
NEW M-F EQUIPMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTORS AND USA POSITION 7,500 7,500 NEW M-F PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING REMODEL 16,003 1,834 14,170 NEW WELL 45 ARSENIC TREATMENT 3,000,000 500,000
NEW M-F CHINA ALLEY - UTILITY REPLACEMENT /RECONSTRUCTION 375,000 30,000 Total 0391 Wate
r 52,652,928 29,392,935 2,479,465 8,555,272
0414 Computer Replacement Reserve
800121 COMPUTER REPLACEMENTS 117,180 33,180 43,000 41,000 NEW VXRAIL SERVERS REPLACEMENT AND GENERATOR 250,000 250,000 Total 0414 Computer Replacement Reserve 367,180 33,180 293,000 41,000 0416 Bldg Maint
NEW BUILDING MAINT. TRUCK/ RPL 94 64,329 64,329
NEW (32) 8FT FOLDING TABLES (18) ROUND TABLES FOR CIVIC 17,205 17,205 NEW BUILDING MAINT. TRUCK (EV)/ RPL 303 58,366 58,366
NEW (33) 8FT LONG FOLDING TABLES FOR CIVIC 10,708 10,708 Total 0416 Building Maint 150,608 0 81,534 69,074
0417 Building Reserves
824603 CARNEGIE BUILDING ROOF UNDERLAYMENT REPLACEMENT 45,425 45,425 823602 G M-F VETERANS BUILDING REHAB 28,350 28,350
NEW FACILITIES MASTER PLAN 310,000 140,000 170,000
NEW M-F LONGFIELD CENTER - REPAINT EXTERIOR 65,160 65,160 NEW ANNUAL FACILITY ADA IMPROVEMENTS 729,120 25,000 130,000 NEW M-F CIVIC AUD - REPLACE RAMP DOORS (2 SETS) 19,080 19,080 NEW M-F CIVIC AUD - REPLACE CARPET IN EAST WING 18,416 18,416 NEW G M-F CARNEGIE BUILDING REHAB 422,800 15,500 331,500 NEW M-F COE PARK - REPAINT EXTERIOR 8,745 8,745
NEW CITY HALL - REPAINT EXTERIOR AND REFINISH DOORS 32,791 32,791 NEW TRANSFER ALL CITY FACILITIES TO VALLEY ALARM FIRE 30,000 30,000 NEW TRANSFER ALL CITY FACILITIES TO VALLEY ALARM BURGLAR 17,500 17,500 Total 0417 Building Reserves 1,727,387 73,775 291,901 711,791 0447 Fleet Operations
NEW FLEET - FUEL DISPENSING CARD READER 150,000 150,000 NEW FLEET SHOP EQUIPMENT 34,491 34,491
NEW FLEET DEPT. VEHICLE/ RPL 329 36,835 36,835
Total 0447 Fleet Operations 221,326 0 184,491 36,835
G= Contingent on Grant Funding
M-F= Multi-Funded
CITY OF HANFORD
Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2026-2027
Fund Fund Name Project # Request Title Project Total Historical FY2026 FY2027 0448 Fleet Reserve
825301 VACUUM TRUCK (REPL 174) 346,120 346,120
825300 BATTALION CHIEF PICKUP (NEW) 80,000 80,000
824301 FIRE ENGINE PUMPER/REPL 161 41,344 41,344
823304 WATER TRENCH WKR/REPL 320 5,500 2,517 2,983
NEW REFUSE DEPT. AUTOMATED TRUCK/ RPL 141 500,000 500,000 NEW REFUSE DEPT. REAR LOAD TRUCK/ RPL 343 500,000 500,000 NEW REFUSE DEPT. AUTOMATED TRUCK/ RPL 142 500,000 500,000 NEW REFUSE DEPT. AUTOMATED TRUCK/ RPL 144 500,000 500,000 NEW M-F STREETS DEPT ASPHALT PATCH TRUCK /RPL 135 168,890 168,890 NEW M-F STREETS DEPT. ROLLER/ RPL 182 56,300 56,300
NEW M-F WATER DEPT. TRUCK 1-TON/ RPL 97 41,846 41,846
NEW M-F REPLACE GENERATOR TO WELL #35 AT FIRE STATION NO.1 / RPL 323 23,949 23,949 NEW M-F AIRPORT TRUCK (EV)/ RPL 63 18,000 18,000
NEW M-F WWTP TRUCK (EV)/ RPL 334 17,820 17,820
NEW M-F CITY HALL GENERATOR/ RPL 379, SUPPORTS EOC 12,870 12,870 Total 0448 Fleet Reserve 2,812,639 469,981 2,329,788 12,870 0452 Aquatics Cap/Eq Repl Res
824617 PLUNGE WATER SLIDE REPAIR 185,000 175,000 5,000
Total 0452 Aquatics Cap/Eq Repl Res 185,000 0 175,000 5,000 Total Funding Sources 396,011,148 59,098,605 37,660,247 44,377,903
ATTACHMENT A GENERAL FUND - DETAIL OF CHANGES
FY 2027
FUND ORG ACCT ACCT DESCRIPTION 2027 BUDGET
2027 AMENDED
BUDGET
ADDITIONAL
APPROPRIATION
BUDGET
AMENDMENT NET CHANGE DETAIL
CITY COUNCIL
0001 11000000777000 TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETING 3,700 7,500 3,800 3,800 Increase for addtl training and conference opportunities for Council Members 0001 11000000749500 PROF AND SPEC SERVICES 226,000 171,400 (54,600) (54,600) Reduce State lobbyist services-Nielsen Merksamer 229,700 178,900 3,800 (54,600) (58,400)
CITY MANAGER - CITY CLERK
0001 11100000749500 PROF AND SPEC SERVICES 31,800 49,800 18,000 18,000 Strategic planning session for City Council 0001 11100000701300 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES - 60,000 60,000 60,000 PT employee to assist with Community Relations TOTAL 31,800 109,800 78,000 - 78,000
HUMAN RESOURCES
0001 11110000749500 PROF AND SPEC SERVICES 5,000 61,500 56,500 56,500 Legal prof services to review City Rules & Regulations/Addtl payroll software related services TOTAL 5,000 61,500 56,500 - 56,500
PLANNING OPERATIONS
0001 14110000492200 SUBDIVISION & ZONING FEES (275,000) (320,000) (45,000) (45,000) 0001 14110000 749500 PROF & SPEC SERVICES 40,000 110,000 70,000 70,000 Increase for on-call consulting and environmental review services- mostly reimbursable, GIS enhancements 0001 14110000 777000 TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETING 2,500 10,000 7,500 7,500 For addtl planning commissioner & staff travel & training TOTAL (232,500) (200,000) 77,500 (45,000) 32,500
CODE COMPLIANCE
0001 14120000496400 WEED ABATEMENT FEES - (6,800) (6,800) (6,800) 0001 14120000 496700 WEED ABATEMENT ASSESSMENT - (5,250) (5,250) (5,250) Xfer of weed abatement to Code Compliance 0001 14120000 741000 FLEET REPLACEMENT RESERVE 8,327 4,696 (3,631) (3,631) Reduction to balance deficit of additional appropriation requests 0001 14120000 749500 PROF AND SPEC SERVICES 1,500 4,000 2,500 2,500 GIS enhancements TOTAL 9,827 (3,354) 2,500 (15,681) (13,181)
POLICE - SUPPORT SERVICE
0001 15110000741000 FLEET REPLACEMENT RESERVE 96,165 48,591 (47,574) (47,574) Reduction to balance deficit of additional appropriation requests 0001 15110000749500 PROF AND SPEC SERVICES 116,000 119,000 3,000 3,000 GIS enhancements TOTAL 212,165 167,591 3,000 (47,574) (44,574)
POLICE - OPERATIONS
0001 15130000741000 FLEET REPLACEMENT RESERVE 519,193 291,832 (227,361) (227,361) Reduction to balance deficit of additional appropriation requests 0001 151300008* RIFLE REPLACEMENT 125,000 147,210 22,210 22,210 Full program-65 rifles. Cost includes trade-in of current rifles 0001 151300008* DRONE PROGRAM EXPANSION 19,000 - (19,000) (19,000) Defer expansion of drone program to offset rifle costs TOTAL 663,193 439,042 22,210 (246,361) (224,151)
POLICE - TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT
0001 15140000741000 FLEET REPLACEMENT RESERVE 27,226 15,355 (11,871) (11,871) Reduction to balance deficit of additional appropriation requests TOTAL 27,226 15,355 - (11,871) (11,871)
POLICE - SCHOOL OFFICER PROGRAM
0001 15160000473200 SRO PROGRAM REVENUE (784,000) (838,000) (54,000) (54,000) Contract increases to offset increased costs of SRO's for 2026-2027 school year TOTAL (784,000) (838,000) - (54,000) (54,000)
POLICE - HART
0001 15190000741000 FLEET REPLACEMENT RESERVE 17,512 9,877 (7,635) (7,635) Reduction to balance deficit of additional appropriation requests TOTAL 17,512 9,877 - (7,635) (7,635)
POLICE - CANINE
0001 15200000741000 FLEET REPLACEMENT RESERVE 20,686 11,667 (9,019) (9,019) Reduction to balance deficit of additional appropriation requests 0001 15200000749500 PROF AND SPEC SERVICES 10,000 24,000 14,000 14,000 K9 training services. No longer shared cost with County. Trainers come to Hanford versus staff traveling TOTAL 30,686 35,667 14,000 (9,019) 4,981
FIRE ADMIN/SUPPRESSION
0001 16100000543100 FIRE/TRAINING REIM (20,000) (48,000) (28,000) (28,000) ISA Reimbursements due to staff initiative to track eligible expenses 0001 16100000741000 FLEET REPLACEMENT RESERVE 349,348 197,032 (152,316) (152,316) Reduction to balance deficit of additional appropriation requests 0001 16100000741200 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 37,500 53,000 15,500 15,500 SCBA annual maintenance & other repairs 0001 16100000742100 BLDG CPTL/EQPT REPL RSRVE - 10,000 10,000 10,000 Establishing Fire Dept contributions to Bldg Reserve 0001 16100000749500 PROF AND SPEC SERVICES 53,000 60,000 7,000 7,000 GIS enhancements 0001 16100000777000 TRAINING/TRAVEL/MEETING 33,000 39,000 6,000 6,000 Increase in training costs/more training opportunities for staff 0001 16100000824009 TRAINING TOWER - 22,000 22,000 22,000 C-Train training facility next to Station #2 0001 16100000919900 ALOC-NON-GF (250,000) (260,000) (10,000) (10,000) Reimbursement for fire hydrant maint supplies TOTAL 202,848 73,032 60,500 (190,316) (129,816)
ATTACHMENT A GENERAL FUND - DETAIL OF CHANGES
FY 2027
FUND ORG ACCT ACCT DESCRIPTION 2027 BUDGET
2027 AMENDED
BUDGET
ADDITIONAL
APPROPRIATION
BUDGET
AMENDMENT NET CHANGE DETAIL
FIRE PREVENTION
0001 16110000494002 LIFE/SAFETY/BLDG INS FEE (15,000) - 15,000 15,000 Xfer of inspections and other services to Building Safety 0001 16110000494003 FIRE PLAN CHECKING FEES (70,000) - 70,000 70,000 0001 16110000494300 FIRE INSPECTN & OTHR FEES (230,000) - 230,000 230,000 0001 16110000496400 WEED ABATEMENT FEES (6,800) - 6,800 6,800 0001 16110000496700 WEED ABATEMENT ASSESSMENT (5,250) - 5,250 5,250 0001 16110000701000 REGULAR EMPLOYEES 90,000 157,290 67,290 67,290 Deputy Fire Chief 0001 16110000701300 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 99,530 65,000 (34,530) (34,530) Reduction of PT staff due to xfer of inspections and other services to Building Safety 0001 16110000701800 INCENTIVE PAY - 15,729 15,729 15,729 Deputy Fire Chief 0001 16110000703300 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 800 1,200 400 400 Deputy Fire Chief 0001 16110000703400 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE - 1,200 1,200 1,200 Deputy Fire Chief 0001 16110000707110 RETIREMENT 22,610 46,240 23,630 23,630 Deputy Fire Chief 0001 16110000707149 OTHER PERSONNEL BENEFITS 4,510 3,726 (784) (784) Deputy Fire Chief 0001 16110000749500 PROF AND SPEC SERVICES 40,000 5,000 (35,000) (35,000) Reduction due to xfer of inspections and other services to Building Safety 0001 16110000744000 OFFICE EXPENSE 4,000 3,000 (1,000) (1,000) Reduction due to xfer of inspections and other services to Building Safety 0001 16110000745000 PUBLICATIONS & DUES 4,000 2,500 (1,500) (1,500) Reduction due to xfer of inspections and other services to Building Safety 0001 16110000760000 SPECIAL DEPT EXPENSE 7,500 4,000 (3,500) (3,500) Reduction due to xfer of inspections and other services to Building Safety 0001 161100007* FIRE HYDRANT SUPPLIES - 10,000 10,000 10,000 Fire hydrant maintenance supplies TOTAL (54,100) 314,885 118,249 250,736 368,985
COMM SERV - ADMIN
0001 17100000 701300 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 10,000 27,000 17,000 17,000 Addition of PT Clerical Support for addtl counter coverage for Comm Serv & Rec (approved at mid-year) TOTAL 10,000 27,000 17,000 - 17,000
COMM SERV - SPORTS
0001 17110000 447130 SOFTBALL CONCESSIONS (320,000) (384,000) (64,000) (64,000) Baseball tournament revenue (July-Dec) (concessions & baseball) 0001 17110000 501104 SP-ADULT MISC SPORTS (500) (204,500) (204,000) (204,000) Baseball tournament revenue (July-Dec) (concessions & baseball) 0001 17110000 701300 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES - 286,000 286,000 286,000 Expanded maint requirements of sports fields due to program participation growth, baseball tournaments hosted at YAC - PT sports coordinator & PT Field Monitors 0001 17110000 749500 PROF AND SPEC SERVICES 110,000 5,000 (105,000) (105,000) Transition from contract labor to PT staff 0001 17110000 767500 COMPLEX EXPENSES 17,000 60,000 43,000 43,000 Maintenance has increased with 10th Ave & Harris fields 0001 17110000 768000 CONCESSION SUPPLIES 96,000 140,000 44,000 44,000 Concession supplies to increase due to additional tournaments TOTAL (97,500) (97,500) 373,000 (373,000) -
COMM SERV - FACILITIES
0001 17160000 701300 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 230,000 258,000 28,000 28,000 Addition of PT Aquatic Tech for the Plunge (approved at mid-year) TOTAL 230,000 258,000 28,000 - 28,000
COMM SERV - YOUTH/ADULT/SPC SERVICES
0001 17190000 501701 TR-CONTRACTED CLASSES - (20,000) (20,000) (20,000) Revenues fom addtl Youth & Senior Programming to offset PT costs 0001 17190000 701300 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 105,000 125,000 20,000 20,000 PT staff to support the Youth & Senior Programming 0001 17190000 760000 SPECIAL DEPT EXPENSE 14,500 29,500 15,000 15,000 Youth & Senior program supplies TOTAL 119,500 134,500 35,000 (20,000) 15,000
COMM SERV - COM PROM/EVENTS
0001 17210000 701300 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 131,000 145,000 14,000 14,000 PT Staff for Winter-Wonderland (historical) TOTAL 131,000 145,000 14,000 - 14,000 PARKS
0001 17220000741000 FLEET REPLACEMENT RESERVE 130,686 73,707 (56,979) (56,979) Reduction to balance deficit of additional appropriation requests 0001 17220000 755000 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 75,000 45,000 (30,000) (30,000) No longer leasing Soc-Com, elimination of mowing services 0001 17220000 765000 CHEMICAL AND CHEMICAL SUPP 25,000 20,000 (5,000) (5,000) Update based on actuals 0001 17220000 758500 RENTS AND LEASES-SI&G 24,000 - (24,000) (24,000) No longer leasing Soc-Com 0001 17220000 8* SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS - 3,334 3,334 3,334 Multi-funded- Camera system at PW Corp Yard TOTAL 254,686 142,041 3,334 (115,979) (112,645)
UTILITIES & ENGINEERING
0001 20100000 420200 ENCROACHMENT PERMITS (19,000) (85,000) (66,000) (66,000) Fee amount increase 0001 20100000 493700 ENGR/INSPECT FEES-SUBDIV (225,000) (370,000) (145,000) (145,000) Increase in surveyor services, mostly reimbursable by developers. Temp addt of engineering inspector 0001 20100000 741000 FLEET REPLACEMENT RESERVE 12,087 6,817 (5,270) (5,270) Reduction to balance deficit of additional appropriation requests 0001 20100000 749500 PROF AND SPEC SERVICES 70,000 327,500 257,500 257,500 services due to vacancy, billable to projects. GIS Enhancements 0001 20100000 8* SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS - 3,334 3,334 3,334 Multi-funded- Camera system at PW Corp Yard TOTAL (161,913) (117,349) 260,834 (216,270) 44,564
ATTACHMENT A GENERAL FUND - DETAIL OF CHANGES
FY 2027
FUND ORG ACCT ACCT DESCRIPTION 2027 BUDGET
2027 AMENDED
BUDGET
ADDITIONAL
APPROPRIATION
BUDGET
AMENDMENT NET CHANGE DETAIL
PW - STREET MAINTENANCE
0001 20110000 701300 PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 50,000 63,000 13,000 13,000 PT Streets workers to assist during busy season July-December 0001 20110000 741000 FLEET REPLACEMENT RESERVE 228,648 128,957 (99,691) (99,691) Reduction to balance deficit of additional appropriation requests 0001 20110000 749500 PROF AND SPEC SERVICES 3,500 6,000 2,500 2,500 GIS enhancements 0001 20110000 760000 SPECIAL DEPT EXPENSE 75,000 145,000 70,000 70,000 Replace lights at intersections City-wide, Street Sweeper dump separation service 0001 20110000 8* SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS - 3,334 3,334 3,334 Multi-funded- Camera system at PW Corp Yard TOTAL 357,148 346,291 88,834 (99,691) (10,857) Total Requested
Appropriations
Budget
Amendments
Total Net (Balanced)
Deficit
1,256,261 (1,256,261) -
ATTACHMENT A GENERAL FUND - DETAIL OF CHANGES
FY 2027
FUND ORG ACCT ACCT DESCRIPTION 2027 BUDGET
2027 AMENDED
BUDGET
ADDITIONAL
APPROPRIATION
BUDGET
AMENDMENT NET CHANGE DETAIL
MEASURE H OPERATIONS
0010 0010 412000 SALES TAX (18,523,670) (16,400,000) 2,123,670 2,123,670 Decrease in projection TOTAL TOTAL (18,523,670) (16,400,000) - 2,123,670 2,123,670
MEASURE H CAPITAL
0011 0011 826600 MH: PAVEMENT REHABILITATION 3,090,000 966,330 (2,123,670) (2,123,670) TOTAL 3,090,000 966,330 - (2,123,670) (2,123,670) Total Requested
Appropriations
Budget
Amendments
Total Net (Balanced)
Deficit
- - -
13.A.
AGENDA
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: 8/4/2026 AGENDA SECTION: PUBLIC HEARING
SUBJECT:
Amended Annexation165: a request to reduce the previous proposed annexation boundary, in order to annex approximately 86.4 acres into the City of Hanford City Limits from the Kings County Jurisdiction. Amended Prezone No. 0013-24: a request to amend the previous prezoning scope, in order to coincide with the amended annexation boundary. The prezone will apply to the properties proposed to be annexed as a R-M Medium-Density Residential (80.95 acres) and MX-N Neighborhood Mixed Use (5.45 acres), consistent with previously approved General Plan Amendment No. 0009-24. The amended project area is located north of Grangeville Boulevard and east of 9 ¼ Avenue. The development site includes two parcels, comprising 83.61 acres (APNs 014- 143-069 and 014-143-078). An additional parcel (APN 014-143-022) is also proposed to be annexed and prezoned as part of the project scope.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff Recommends the City Council
1. Adopt Resolution No. 26-54-R, initiating proceedings for Amended Annexation No. 165 and direct staff to file the appropriate application with the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) of Kings County.
2. Introduce and waive the first reading of Ordinance No. 26-04, approving Amended Prezone No. 0013-24.
Recommended Motion:
1. I move to adopt Resolution No. 26-54-R, initiating proceedings for Amended Annexation No. 165 and direct staff to file the appropriate application with the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) of Kings County.
2. I move to introduce and waive the first reading of Ordinance No. 26-04, approving Amended Prezone No. 0013-24.
BACKGROUND:
On January 20, 2026, following a recommendation by the Planning Commission, the City Council approved/certified the following actions:
1. Certification of the Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2025-73 (SCH# 2024121093) for the
project.
2. Adoption of Resolution No. 25-68-R, initiating proceedings for Annexation No. 165 and direction to staff to file the appropriate application with the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) of Kings County.
3. Adoption of Resolution No. 25-69-R, approving General Plan Amendment No. 0009-24.
4. Adoption of Ordinance No. 25-13, approving Prezone No. 0013-24. (Adopted on 2nd reading on February 3, 2026)
5. Adoption of Resolution No. 25-70-R, approving Tentative Subdivision No. 0012-24 (TT 945).
6. Adoption of Resolution No. 25-71-R, approving Planned Unit Development No 0037-24.
The original project request included:
Annexation165: a request to annex approximately 141.85 acres into the City of Hanford City Limits from the Kings County Jurisdiction. The annexation area is a combination of the Project Site (83.61 acres) and an area to the north, not proposed to be developed at this time (58.24 acres).
General Plan Amendment No. 0009-24: a request to change the land use designation from a combination of Low- and Medium-Density Residential to Medium-Density Residential (78.16 acres) and Neighborhood Mixed Use (5.45 acres) for 83.61 acres of the project site.
Prezone No. 0013-24: a request to prezone the properties as a R-M Medium-Density Residential (78.16 acres) and MX-N Neighborhood Mixed Use (5.45 acres), consistent with the proposed General Plan Amendment and R-L-5 Low-Density Residential (51.92 acres) and C-N Neighborhood Commercial (6.32 acres), consistent with the General Plan Designation.
Tentative Subdivision Map 00012-24: a request to subdivide 83.61 acres of the annexation area into a 650-unit multi-family (300 units) and single-family (350 units) residential subdivision and a 5.45- acre Neighborhood Mixed Use site with a planned unit development overlay.
Planned Unit Development No. 0037-24: a request to allow various deviations from the regulation of the R-M Medium-Density Residential zone district for the mixed use subdivision, proposed under Tentative Tract 945, including reduced lot size, lot width, lot depth, site area per dwelling unit requirements, setbacks, open space dimensions, and allow removal of the block wall requirement between MX-N Neighborhood Mixed Use and R-M Medium-Density Residential.
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2025-73 (SCH #2024121093): a request to certify that the project will have a less than significant adverse impacts on the environment with the incorporation of mitigation measures.
Amended Request
Following forwarding of the annexation application to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) of Kings County, the City received a request to amend the original annexation request from the applicant, in order to reduce the area to be annexed into the City.
Amended Annexation165 is a request to reduce the previous proposed annexation boundary, in order to annex approximately 86.4 acres into the City of Hanford City Limits from the Kings County Jurisdiction.
Amended Prezone No. 0013-24 is a request to amend the previous prezoning scope, in order to coincide with the amended annexation boundary. The prezone will apply to the properties proposed to be annexed as a R-M Medium-Density Residential (80.95 acres) and MX-N Neighborhood Mixed Use (5.45 acres), consistent with previously approved General Plan Amendment No. 0009-24.
Background: A portion of the area proposed to be annexed has an approved subdivision map, Tentative Subdivision Map 00012-24, which was a request to subdivide 83.61 acres of the annexation area into a 650-unit multi-family (300 units) and single-family (350 units) residential subdivision and a 5.45-acre Neighborhood Mixed Use site. The subdivision has an approved planned unit development overlay, Planned Unit Development No. 0037-24, which was a request to allow various deviations from the regulation of the R-M Medium-Density Residential zone district for the residential subdivision, including reduced lot size, lot width, lot depth, setbacks, and increased driveway paved surface allowance.
A Mitigated Negative Declaration was certified for the project (SCH # 2024121093). A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program was required, and a Notice of Determination was filed for the project on January 28, 2026.
Location of Project: The amended project area is located north of Grangeville Boulevard and east of 9 ¼ Avenue. The development site includes two parcels, comprising 83.61 acres (APNs 014-143- 069 and 014-143-078). An additional parcel (APN 014-143-022) is also proposed to be annexed and prezoned as part of the project scope.
Figure 1:
Project Location
The former additional annexation area boundary, encompassing 58.24 acres (APNs 014-143-022, 014-830-011, 014-830-010, 014-830-013, 014-830-014, 014-830-015, 014-830-016, 014-830-017, 014-830-018), has been removed from the annexation and prezone request and is proposed to remain within the Kings County Jurisdiction and Kings County’s zoning designation.
Figure 2:
Parcels Excluded vs. Included in Annexation
(Parcels removed from original annexation request shown in red; parcels proposed to be annexed shown in green)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Amended Annexation 165
Amended Annexation 165 is a request to annex approximately 86.4 acres into the City of Hanford City Limits from the Kings County Jurisdiction. The annexation area is a combination of the Project Site (83.61 acres) and an area to the east, not proposed to be developed at this time (3.04 acres). See Figure 3 and Attachment 1.
Figure 3:
Amended Annexation Area (shown in bold)
General Plan Designation
General Plan Amendment No. 0009-24 was approved in January for the project area. General Plan Amendment No. 0009-24 was a request to change the land use designation from a combination of Low- and Medium-Density Residential to Medium-Density Residential (78.16 acres) and Neighborhood Mixed Use (5.45 acres) for 83.61 acres of the project site.
Figure 4: General Plan Designation
(as approved by General Plan Amendment No. 0009-24)
Zoning
Current
The property is currently in the Kings County Jurisdiction and zoned AL-10 Limited Agriculture.
Figure 5: Kings County Zoning
AL-10
Amended Prezone No. 0013-24
Amended Prezone No. 0013-24 is a request to amend the previous prezoning scope, in order to coincide with the amended annexation boundary. The prezone will apply to the properties proposed to be annexed as a R-M Medium-Density Residential (80.95 acres) and MX-N Neighborhood Mixed Use (5.45 acres), consistent with previously approved General Plan Amendment No. 0009-24.
Figure 6: Amended Prezone No. 0013-24
(R-M Medium Density Residential and MX-N Neighborhood Mised Use)
Existing Land Use
The annexation area includes two parcels formerly utilized for agriculture and one large lot single- family residence.
Approved Entitlements:
Tentative Subdivision Map 00012-24 (TT 945) was approved for the project site. Tentative Tract 945 was a request to subdivide 83.61 acres of the annexation area into a 650-unit multi-family (300 units) and single-family (350 units) residential subdivision and a 5.45-acre Neighborhood Mixed Use site with a planned unit development overlay.
Planned Unit Development No. 0037-24 was also approved for the project site and was a request to allow various deviations from the regulation of the R-M Medium-Density Residential zone district for the mixed use subdivision, proposed under Tentative Tract 945, including reduced lot size, lot width, lot depth, site area per dwelling unit requirements, setbacks, open space dimensions, and allow removal of the block wall requirement between MX-N Neighborhood Mixed Use and R-M Medium- Density Residential.
Tentative Tract 00012-24 (TT 945) is attached for reference – Attachment 2.
Planning Commission Action
The amended annexation and prezone request were presented to the Planning Commission on Tuesday, July 28, 2026 during a public hearing item.
1 person spoke in favor of the project
0 person(s) spoke in opposition
The Planning Commission reviewed the project for consistency with the General Plan and voted 5-0 to find the proposed Annexation No. 165 (as amended) consistent with the Hanford General Plan Policies L15 and L17 and forward Annexation No. 165 (as amended) to the City Council, with a recommendation that an application be made to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) of Kings County.
The Planning Commission also voted 5-0 to adopt Resolution No. 2026-13, recommending approval of Amended Prezone No. 0013-24 to the City Council.
PROJECT EVALUATION
Amended Annexation No. 165
Amended Annexation 165 is a request to annex approximately 86.4 acres into the City of Hanford City Limits from the Kings County Jurisdiction. The annexation area is a combination of the Project Site (83.61 acres) and an area to the east, not proposed to be developed at this time (3.04 acres). See Figure 3 and Attachment 1.
Annexation of land into Hanford allows previously undeveloped land to become available for development and allows the City of Hanford to provide the territory that is annexed with its full range of City services. The annexation process can serve as an interim growth management tool, by
limiting annexation to only the land that is needed for growth at the time.
The Hanford Planning Commission reviewed the proposed annexation at their meeting on July 28, 2026, and made a finding of consistency with the Hanford General Plan. The Planning Commission found Annexation 165 (as amended) is consistent with the Hanford General Plan Policy L15 and L17.
Policy L15 Initiation of Annexations
Consider initiation of annexation of land into the City of Hanford only when the following criteria are met:
1. The land is within the Primary Sphere of Influence.
Analysis: The property proposed to be annexed is within the City’s Primary Sphere of Influence, as shown in Attachment 3.
2. The capacity of the water, sewer, fire, school, and police services are adequate to service the area to be annexed or will be adequate at the time that development occurs.
Analysis: A Plan for Services has been prepared by Engineering for Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Storm Drainage – see Attachment 4.
Fire and Police
Fire and police services are adequate to service the area to be annexed. Impacts to fire and police services will be mitigated through payment of impact fees.
School
Since the proposed area proposed to be annexed will be developed, as shown in approved Tentative Tract 945, which includes the addition of 650 residential units, the number of students in the school district will increase. The residential development project’s developer will pay school development impact fees to the school districts at the time of building permit issuance in compliance with Education Code Section 17620 and Government Code Section 65995 et. Seq. These fees are used to construct new or expanded school facilities.
The City’s role in development and managing school sites and programs is limited. The various school districts truly govern where a new school site would be located and when it would be necessary to construct or expand facilities, in order to adequately accommodate population growth. Elected governing school boards are responsible for budgeting and decision-making and the State Department of Education establishes school site and construction standards. The General Plan provides policy which focuses on collaboration with school districts in determining new school locations and utilizing school facilities for general public needs. School districts would be able to utilize the General Plan, along with other plans, standards, and codes, to establish new school sites and to make decisions on school amenities and cohesiveness with the surrounding area.
3. Land for development within the City limits is insufficient to meet the current land use needs.
Analysis: The applicant proposes the development of an 83.61-acre development in the north- east planning area. Available land for new development within the City limits is limited. Within the existing City limits, the majority of the property available for residential development has been developed or has been entitled. The proposal is considered implementation of the General Plan.
4. The territory to be annexed is contiguous to existing developed areas.
Analysis: The territory to be annexed is directly contiguous to the current City limits to the north (portion) and west. One annexation is in progress south of the project site – shown in green.
Figure 7: Annexation in Progress
Policy L17 Plan for Services
Prepare and make publicly available a written Plan for Services that describes how urban services will be provided prior to initiating an annexation.
Analysis: A Plan for Services is attached (Attachment 4).
Favorable Factors for Annexation
Favorable and unfavorable factors for annexation have been adopted by LAFCO. The existence of favorable or unfavorable factors should not decide approval or denial; however, a substantial number of favorable or unfavorable factors may determine approval or denial of the proposal.
1. The proposed area is close to urban development and municipal-type services and would enhance its potential for full development.
Analysis: The proposed area is close to the existing City limits and is a logical extension of the City. The annexation area can be served by municipal-type services. The annexation area is designated as a combination of Medium-Density Residential and Neighborhood Mixed Use.
This area has been considered for urban development by the General Plan and is necessary to accommodate growth within the City of Hanford.
2. The proposed annexation conforms to the adopted General Plan.
Analysis: The proposed area is close to the existing City limits and is a logical extension of the City. The annexation area can be served by municipal-type services. The annexation area is designated as a combination of Medium-Density Residential and Neighborhood Mixed Use.
This area has been considered for urban development by the General Plan and is necessary to accommodate growth within the City of Hanford. APN 014-143-078 and 014-143-069 of the annexation area are proposed to be developed as shown in Tentative Tract 945. Tentative Tract 945 proposes the development of 650 residential units (350 single-family and 300 multi- family), as well as 5.45 acres of commercial development. The development is consistent with the General Plan.
The annexation is consistent with the General Plan Section 3.2.4, which states, “Annexation of land into Hanford allows previously undeveloped land to become available for development and allows the City of Hanford to provide the territory that is annexed with its full range of City services.” The annexation area is also consistent with Policy L15 and L17 of the General Plan, as analyzed above.
3. The proposed area is consistent with the sphere of influence.
Analysis: The property proposed to be annexed is within the City’s Primary Sphere of Influence, as shown in Attachment 3.
4. The proposed annexation comes with 100% consent of all landowners.
Analysis: The annexation area, as amended, comes with consent of all property owners - Consent to Annex form - Attachment 6.
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL
Annexation No. 165
The Hanford Planning Commission reviewed the proposed annexation and making a finding of consistency with the Hanford General Plan to forward to the City Council, finding Amended Annexation 165 consistent with the Hanford General Plan Policy L15 and L17. (as described in the evaluation above)
Favorable Factors for Annexation
Favorable and unfavorable factors for annexation have been adopted by LAFCO. The existence of favorable or unfavorable factors should not decide approval or denial; however, a substantial number of favorable or unfavorable factors may determine approval or denial of the proposal.
The factors of annexation pertinent to Amended Annexation 165 appear in the evaluation above.
Amended Prezone No. 0013-24
In accordance with HMC Section 17.86.030, before a zone change may be approved, all of the following findings shall be made by the reviewing authority:
1. 1. That the amendment is internally consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan and the Municipal Code.
2. Analysis: That Amended Prezone No. 0013-24 is internally consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan, including Medium-Density Residential Policies L34 – L37 and Neighborhood Mixed Use policies L60 – L64, and Annexation Policies L15 and L17. The development proposed in the annexation area, under Tentative Tract 945, conforms with the regulations pertaining to the R-M Medium-Density Residential zone district and MX-N Neighborhood Mixed Use zone district, except where expressly modified under Planned Unit Development No. 0037-24.
2. That the amendment would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of the community.
ANALYSIS: That this application has been reviewed by County departments, utility companies, City Fire Department, City Building Department, and other involved departments. Any mitigation required for public health and safety were applied to the proposal and required in the mitigation monitoring and reporting program for Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2025-73, for which a Notice of Determination was filed.
3. 3. That the amendment would maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the City.
4. Analysis: That job-housing balance is achieved by increasing opportunities for people to work and live in close proximity. The ratio is expressed as the number of jobs divided by the number of housing units. The jobs-housing balance is a general tool for analyzing where people work, where they live, and how effectively they can travel between the two. In the planning area, the existing jobs-housing balance ratio in 2013-2014 was 1.17. It is estimated that the implementation of the
General Plan would increase the jobs-housing balance by 0.45 to 1.62, which would make the planning area a job-rich area.
The project conforms to the General Plan, as amended through General Plan Amendment No. 0009-24, which proposed the up-zoning of approximately 72.92 acres of Low-Density Residential to Medium-Density Residential and the addition of a 5.45-acre Neighborhood Mixed Use site. The site will increase both housing opportunity and commercial activity, thus maintaining an appropriate balance of land uses within the City.
4. 4. That the anticipated land uses on the subject site would be compatible with existing and future surrounding uses.
5. Analysis: That the anticipated land uses on the subject site include one large-lot single family residence, small lot single-family residences, duplexes, low-rise apartments, and neighborhood commercial uses, as proposed under Tentative Tract 945. The anticipated land uses for the annexation area include medium-density residential and mixed-use development. The anticipated land uses are compatible with the surrounding land uses and planned land uses in the area, which include agricultural land, a future regional park, single-family and multi-family residential.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
The original project’s scope was evaluated in an initial study, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Initial Study analyzed the project’s potential impacts on
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forest Resources
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Energy
Geology and Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Hydrology and Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population and Housing
Public Services
Parks and Recreation
Transportation
Tribal Cultural Resources
Utilities and Service Systems
Wildfire
Based on the review, it was determined that the proposed project would not result in a significant adverse impact on the environment with the incorporation of mitigation measures, therefore Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2025-73 was certified by the City Council on January 20, 2026. A Notice of Determination was filed for the project – Attachment 5.
The Mitigated Negative Declaration and associated documents can be viewed on CEQAnet: https://ceqanet.lci.ca.gov/2024121093/2
The environmental document covers the entire project boundary and development; therefore, additional environmental review is not required.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Notice of Public Hearing for the amended project was published in the Hanford Sentinel and mailed to property owners within 300 ft. of the project site on July 8, 2026 and again on July 22, 2026. The Community Development Department has not received comments on the projects as of the date of preparation of this report.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project will not create a fiscal impact associated with the annexation or prezone request.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution 26-54-R (Annexation)
2. Ordinance 04-26 (Prezone)
3. Annexation 165 (reduced scope)
4. Tentative Tract 945
5. Sphere of Influence
6. Plan for Services - Annexation 165
7. Notice of Determination 2025-73
8. Consent to Annex
RESOLUTION NO. 26-54-R
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY OF HANFORD REQUESTING THE
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS FOR AMENDED ANNEXATION NO. 165, A REQUEST TO ANNEX APPROXIMATELY 86.4
ACRES INTO THE CITY OF HANFORD CITY LIMITS FROM THE KINGS COUNTY JURISDICTION. THE PROJECT IS LOCATED NORTH OF GRANGEVILLE BOULEVARD AND EAST OF 9 ¼ AVENUE. (APNS 014-143-069, 014-143-078, 014-143-022) RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hanford on August 4, 2026, that WHEREAS, the City of Hanford desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to the Cortese -Knox- Hertzberg Local Reorganization Act of 2000, Division 3, commencing with Section 5600 of the California Government Code, an affected City, as defined therein, may by resolution adopted by its legislative body make a proposal for a change of organization and request initiation of proceedings thereon; and WHEREAS, notice of intent to adopt this resolution of application has been given, and this Council has conducted a public hearing based upon this notification; and WHEREAS, the principal reasons for the proposed annexation are as follows:
1. The land will be within the Primary Sphere of Influence.
2. The capacity of the water, sewer, fire, school, and police services are adequate to service the area to be annexed, or will be adequate at the time that development occurs.
3. Land for development within the City limits is insufficient to meet the current land use needs.
4. The territory to be annexed is contiguous to existing developed areas.
WHEREAS, the following agency would be affected by the proposed jurisdictional changes:
Agency Nature of Change
City of Hanford Annexation
WHEREAS, the territory proposed to be annexed is uninhabited, and a map and description of the boundaries of the territory are attached hereto as Exhibits A (annexation map) and B (legal description) and by this reference incorporated herein, and,
WHEREAS, the proposal is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Hanford; and WHEREAS, it is desired to provide that the proposed annexation be subject to the following terms and conditions:
1. That the annexation area be prezoned a combination of R-M Medium -Density Residential (78.16 acres) and MX-N Neighborhood Mixed Use (5.45 acres), consistent with the General Plan , as amended through Amendment 0009-24.
2. That the Williamson Act contract for APN 014-143-078 be cancelled upon annexation into the City limits.
WHEREAS, this proposal will be consistent with the spheres of influence for all agencies which would be affected by the annexation; and
WHEREAS, The Council certified that an Initial Study was prepared for the project, consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act; and
WHEREAS, on January 20, 2026, the City Council determined that the project would not result in significant impacts to the environment with the incorporation of mitigation measures and Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2025 -73 (SCH #2024121093) was certified and mitigations measures required, as included in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, shown in Exhibit C.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Resolution of Application is hereby adopted and approved by the City Council of the City of Hanford and the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kings County is hereby requested to take proceedings of the annexation of territory as authorized in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, this Resolution of Application is hereby adopted and approved by the City Council of the City of Hanford and the Local Agency Formation Commission of Kings County is hereby requested to take proceedings of the annexation of territory as authorized in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford held on the 4
th day of August 2026 by the following vote:
AYES: Council Member ________________________ ________________________
________________________
________________________
________________________
NOES: Council Member ________________________ ABSTAIN: Council Member ________________________ ABSENT: Council Member ________________________ __________________________________________
MAYOR
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF KINGS )
CITY OF HANFORD ) SS
I, Natalie Corral, City Clerk of the City of Hanford, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Hanford at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4th day of August 2026.
Dated: ______________________
__________________________________
City Clerk
Exhibit A
Annexation Map
9 1/4 AVENUE
COURSE 13
ANNEXATION AREA86.40 ACRES
E1/4 CORSEC. 19-18/22
SE CORSEC. 19-18/22
LELAND WAY
EX. CITY LIMITS
S00°08'55"E 2649.14'
S89°46'01"E 687.64'
COURSE 15
COURSE 2COURSE 4COURSE 3COURSE 8COURSE 5
COURSE 9
COURSE 12
COURSE 10
COURSE 11
450.03'N00°08'33"W
R=1525.00'L=314.64'D=11°49'17"
R=1475.00'L=304.33'D=11°49'17"
N89°20'39"W 997.38'
N11°57'50"W 1304.65'
N00°08'33"W 129.84'
N84°44'20"W 74.76'N89°20'39"W 111.60'N84°20'18"W 68.76'COURSE 6R=30.00'L=46.71'D=89°12'06"COURSE 7N04°08'13"W 129.20' S89°51'27"W(R)
N78°02'10"E(R)
GRANGEVILLE BLVD.
COURSE 14S89°46'01"E 933.30'
N0°08'55"W 30.00'
CENTERSEC. 19-18/22S1/4 CORSEC. 19-18/22
PROPERTYLELAND WAY
ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF HANFORDANNEXATION NO. 2025 - __________ N
FERNWOOD DR.SUBJECT
HWY 43FARGO AVE
VICINITY MAP
400'0'SCALE: 1" = 400'200'
N
24186BBBM CITY OF HANFORD EXHIBIT B-1www.borumlandsurveying.com810 W. ACEQUIA ST.VISALIA, CA 93291 7-2-26CHECKED:DRAWN:DATE:PROJECT:
(SEE EXHIBIT B-2)
9 1/4 AVE.
Exhibit B
Legal Description
Exhibit A
Geographic Description
City of Hanford
Annexation 2025-____
Annexation to the City of Hanford
That portion of the East Half of the Southeast quarter of Section 19, Township 18 South, Range 22 East, Mount Diablo Meridian in the County of Kings, State of California, described as follows:
Commencing at the Southeast quarter of said Section 19;
Course 1: Thence North 00˚08'55" West, along the East line of said Southeast quarter, 30.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
Course 2: Thence N89°20’39”W along said North right of way line a distance of 997.38 feet, thence continuing along said North right of way the following courses;
Course 3: Thence N84°44’20”W a distance of 74.76;
Course 4: Thence N89°20’39”W a distance of 110.60 feet;
Course 5: Thence N84°20’18”W a distance of 68.76 feet to the termination of said North right of way line and the beginning of a tangent curve concave Northeasterly with a radius of 30 feet and a central angle of 89°12’06”;
Course 6: Thence northerly along said curve a distance of 46.71 feet;
Course 7: Thence N04°08’13”W along the Easterly right of way of 9 ¼ Ave a distance of 129.20 feet thence continuing along said Easterly right of way the following courses;
Course 8: Thence N00°08’33”W a distance of 450.03 feet to a tangent curve concave Westerly with a radius of 1525 feet and a central angle of 11°49’17”;
Course 9: Thence northerly along said curve a distance of 314.64 feet;
Course 10: Thence N11°57’50”W a distance of 1304.65 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave easterly with a radius of 1475.00 feet and a central angle of 11°49’17”;
Course 11: Thence northerly along said curve a distance of 304.33 feet;
Course 12: Thence N00°08’33”W a distance of 129.84 feet to a point on the North line of the Southeast quarter of said Section 19 and the termination of said easterly right of way of 9 ¼ Ave.;
Course 13: Thence S89°46’01”E along the North line of said Southeast quarter a distance of 687.64 feet to the centerline of 9 ¼ Ave.;
Course 14: Thence S89°46’01”E along the North line of said Southeast quarter a distance of 933.30 feet to the centerline of 9 ¼ Ave. also being the East line of said Southeast quarter;
Course 15: Thence South 00˚08'55" East along the East line of said Southeast quarter, 2649.14 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 86.40 acres, more or less.
Parcel Map Check Report
Client: Prepared by:
Client Preparer
Client Company Your Company Name
Address 1 123 Main Street
Date: 7/2/2026 10:17:50 AM
Parcel Name: ANNEX
Description:
Process segment order counterclockwise: False
Enable mapcheck across chord: False
North:989.28' East:27,335.19'
Segment# 1: Line
Course: S0° 08' 55"E Length: 2,649.139'
North: -1,659.85' East: 27,342.07'
Segment# 2: Line
Course: N89° 20' 39"W Length: 997.379'
North: -1,648.44' East: 26,344.75'
Segment# 3: Line
Course: N84° 44' 20"W Length: 74.760'
North: -1,641.58' East: 26,270.31'
Segment# 4: Line
Course: N89° 20' 40"W Length: 111.598'
North: -1,640.30' East: 26,158.72'
Segment# 5: Line
Course: N84° 20' 16"W Length: 68.762'
North: -1,633.52' East: 26,090.29'
Segment# 6: Curve
Length: 46.706' Radius: 30.000'
Delta: 89°12'06" Tangent: 29.585'
Chord: 42.130' Course: N44° 44' 36"W
Course In: N0° 39' 21"E Course Out: S89° 51' 27"W
RP North: -1,603.52' East: 26,090.63'
End North: -1,603.60' East: 26,060.63'
Segment# 7: Line
Course: N4° 08' 13"W Length: 129.199'
North: -1,474.73' East: 26,051.31'
Segment# 8: Line
Course: N0° 08' 33"W Length: 450.030'
North: -1,024.70' East: 26,050.19'
Segment# 9: Curve
Length: 314.641' Radius: 1,525.000'
Delta: 11°49'17" Tangent: 157.881'
Chord: 314.084' Course: N6° 03' 11"W
Course In: S89° 51' 27"W Course Out: N78° 02' 10"E
RP North: -1,028.50' East: 24,525.20'
End North: -712.37' East: 26,017.07'
Segment# 10: Line
Course: N11° 57' 50"W Length: 1,304.651'
North: 563.94' East: 25,746.63'
Segment# 11: Curve
Length: 304.325' Radius: 1,475.000'
Delta: 11°49'17" Tangent: 152.705'
Chord: 303.786' Course: N6° 03' 11"W
Course In: N78° 02' 10"E Course Out: S89° 51' 27"W
RP North: 869.70' East: 27,189.59'
End North: 866.03' East: 25,714.59'
Segment# 12: Line
Course: N0° 08' 33"W Length: 129.840'
North: 995.87' East: 25,714.27'
Segment# 13: Line
Course: S89° 46' 01"E Length: 687.641'
North: 993.07' East: 26,401.90'
Segment# 14: Line
Course: S89° 46' 01"E Length: 933.302'
North: 989.28' East: 27,335.20'
Perimeter: 8,201.974' Area: 3,763,395.18Sq.Ft.
Error Closure: 0.00 Course: S72° 09' 37"E
Error North : -0.001 East: 0.002
Precision 1: 8,201,973,000.000
Exhibit C
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
COPPER RIDGE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION Page 88 of 85
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
As required by Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, subd. (a)(1), a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been prepared for the Project in order to monitor the implementation of the mitigation measures that have been adopted for the Project. This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been created based upon the findings of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Copper Ridge Subdivision proposed by Quest Equity LLC in the City of Hanford.
The first column of the table identifies the mitiga tion measure. The second column names the party responsible for carrying out the required action. The third column, “Timing of Mitigation Measure” identifies the time the mitigation measure should be initiated. The fourth column, “Responsible Party for Monitoring,” names the party ensuring that the mitigation measure is implemented. The last column will be used by the City of Hanford to ensure that the individual mitigation measures have been monitored.
Plan checking and verification of mitigation compliance shall be the responsibility of the City of Hanford.
MITIGATION MEASURE RESPONSIBLE PARTY
FOR
IMPLEMENTATION
IMPLEMENTATION
TIMING
RESPONSIBLE
PARTY FOR
MONITORING
VERIFICATION
Biological Resources
Mitigation Measure BIO 1
(Construction Timing). If
feasible, future
construction activities will
take place entirely outside
of the avian nesting
season, defined as
February 1 to August 31.
Applicant
Developer
Builder
Ongoing City of Hanford
Mitigation Measure BIO 2
(Preconstruction Surveys).
If construction must occur
between February 1 and
August 31, a qualified
biologist will conduct
surveys for active bird
nests within 7 days prior to
the start of work during
this period. The survey
area will encompass the
site and accessible
surrounding lands within ¼
mile for nesting Swainson’s
hawks, 500 feet for other
nesting raptors, 300 feet
for the tricolored
blackbird, and 250 feet for
Applicant
Developer
Builder
7 days prior to
construction
City of Hanford
COPPER RIDGE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION Page 89 of 85
other nesting birds.
Mitigation Measure BIO 3
(Avoidance of Active
Nests). Should any active
nests be discovered in or
near proposed
construction zones, the
biologist will identify a
suitable construction-free
buffer around the nest.
This buffer will be
identified on the ground
with flagging or fencing
and will be maintained
until the biologist has
determined that the young
have fledged and are
capable of foraging
independently.
Applicant
Developer
Builder
Ongoing City of Hanford
Cultural Resources
Mitigation Measure CUL-1:
In the event of accidental
discovery of unidentified
archaeological remains
during development or
ground disturbing activities
in the Project area, all work
shall be halted in
immediate vicinity (within
a 100-foot radius) until a
qualified archaeologist can
identify the discovery and
assess its significance.
Applicant/
Construction Contractor
Ongoing during
construction
City of Hanford
Mitigation Measure CUL 2:
If human remains are
uncovered during
construction, work shall be
halted, and the Kings
County Coroner is to be
notified to investigate the
remains and arrange
proper treatment and
disposition. If the remains
Applicant/
Construction Contractor
Ongoing during
construction
City of Hanford
COPPER RIDGE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION Page 90 of 85
are identified on the basis
of archaeological context,
age, cultural associations,
or biological traits to be
those of a Native
American, California Health
and Safety Code 7050.5
and California Public
Resources Code 5097.98
require that the coroner
notify the Native American
Heritage Commission
(NAHC) within 24 hours of
discovery. The NAHC will
then identify the Most
Likely Descendent who will
make recommendations
regarding the treatment
and disposition of the
remains.
Mitigation Measure CUL 3
A burial Treatment Plan
shall be entered into by the
Project applicant/property
owner prior to any ground
disturbing activities.
Applicant
Construction Contractor
Prior to ground
disturbing activities
City of Hanford
CC Ordinance Prezone 0013-24, Page 1 of 3
ORDINANCE NO. 26-04
AMENDED PREZONE NO. 0013-24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HANFORD PREZONING
CERTAIN PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF HANFORD FROM COUNTY ZONING AL-10 LIMITED AGRICULTURE TO A COMBINATION OF R-M MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (78.16 ACRES) AND MX-N NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE (5.45 ACRES),
CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN, AS AMENDED BY GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0009-24
The City Council of the City of Hanford does ordain as follows:
Section 1: The following described territory situated in the City of Hanford is hereby prezoned under the terms of Chapter 17.86 of the Hanford Municipal Code:
Amended Annexation 165 filed by N&M Tulare, LLC
FROM: County zoning of AL-10 Limited Agriculture
TO: City zoning R-M Medium-Density Residential (78.16 acres) and MX-N Neighborhood Mixed Use (5.45 acres), as shown in Exhibit A
On property described in Exhibit B, containing approximately 86.4 acres, as depicted in attached Exhibit C; and
Section 2: The Council does hereby find as a fact that this Ordinance has been recommended for passage by the Planning Commission of the City of Hanford after public hearing before the Planning Commission after notice required by Section 17.70.100 of the Hanford Municipal Code and Government Code Section 65854. The City Council certified Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 202 5-73 on January 20, 2026 for the project, in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act. The City Council hereby finds that the prezoning is required to achieve the objectives of the zoning regulations as set forth in Section 17.06.010 of the Hanford Municipal Code, and that this O rdinance has been introduced by the City Council after public hearing held on the 4
th day of August 2026 at 7:00 p.m. of said day after notice required under the provisions of Section 65856 of the Government Code.
CC Ordinance Prezone 0013-24, Page 2 of 3
Section 3: This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its passage, and shall be published once in the Hanford Sentinel within fifteen (15) days after its passage, and the zoning will apply to such property in the event of subsequent annexation to the City under the provisions of Section 65859 of the Government Code.
Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford duly called and held on the ____ day of ________, by the following roll call vote:
ATTEST:
Natalie Corral
APPROVED
_________________________
MAYOR of the City of Hanford
CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF KINGS ) ss
CITY OF HANFORD )
I, NATALIE CORRAL, City Clerk of the City of Hanford, do hereby certify the foregoing ordinance was duly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford on the 4 th day of August,
2026 and it was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford held on the _______ day of ______________, 2026.
Dated: _____________________ _____________________________
Natalie Corral
City Clerk
CC Ordinance Prezone 0013-24, Page 3 of 3
Exhibit A
Prezone No. 0013-24
A request to prezone the properties as a R-M Medium-Density Residential (78.16 acres) and MX-N Neighborhood Mixed Use (5.45 acres), consistent with the General Plan, as amended by General Plan Amendment 0009-24
9 1/4 AVENUE
COURSE 13
ANNEXATION AREA86.40 ACRES
E1/4 CORSEC. 19-18/22
SE CORSEC. 19-18/22
LELAND WAY
EX. CITY LIMITS
S00°08'55"E 2649.14'
S89°46'01"E 687.64'
COURSE 15
COURSE 2COURSE 4COURSE 3COURSE 8COURSE 5
COURSE 9
COURSE 12
COURSE 10
COURSE 11
450.03'N00°08'33"W
R=1525.00'L=314.64'D=11°49'17"
R=1475.00'L=304.33'D=11°49'17"
N89°20'39"W 997.38'
N11°57'50"W 1304.65'
N00°08'33"W 129.84'
N84°44'20"W 74.76'N89°20'39"W 111.60'N84°20'18"W 68.76'COURSE 6R=30.00'L=46.71'D=89°12'06"COURSE 7N04°08'13"W 129.20' S89°51'27"W(R)
N78°02'10"E(R)
GRANGEVILLE BLVD.
COURSE 14S89°46'01"E 933.30'
N0°08'55"W 30.00'
CENTERSEC. 19-18/22S1/4 CORSEC. 19-18/22
PROPERTYLELAND WAY
ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF HANFORDANNEXATION NO. 2025 - __________ N
FERNWOOD DR.SUBJECT
HWY 43FARGO AVE
VICINITY MAP
400'0'SCALE: 1" = 400'200'
N
24186BBBM CITY OF HANFORD EXHIBIT B-1www.borumlandsurveying.com810 W. ACEQUIA ST.VISALIA, CA 93291 7-2-26CHECKED:DRAWN:DATE:PROJECT:
(SEE EXHIBIT B-2)
9 1/4 AVE.
Exhibit C
Geographic Description
City of Hanford
Annexation 2025-____
Annexation to the City of Hanford
That portion of the East Half of the Southeast quarter of Section 19, Township 18 South, Range 22 East, Mount Diablo Meridian in the County of Kings, State of California, described as follows:
Commencing at the Southeast quarter of said Section 19; Course 1: Thence North 00˚08'55" West, along the East line of said Southeast quarter, 30.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
Course 2: Thence N89°20’39”W along said North right of way line a distance of 997.38 feet, thence continuing along said North right of way the following courses; Course 3: Thence N84°44’20”W a distance of 74.76;
Course 4: Thence N89°20’39”W a distance of 110.60 feet; Course 5: Thence N84°20’18”W a distance of 68.76 feet to the termination of said North right of way line and the beginning of a tangent curve concave Northeasterly with a radius of 30 feet and a central angle of 89°12’06”;
Course 6: Thence northerly along said curve a distance of 46.71 feet; Course 7: Thence N04°08’13”W along the Easterly right of way of 9 ¼ Ave a distance of 129.20 feet thence continuing along said Easterly right of way the following courses; Course 8: Thence N00°08’33”W a distance of 450.03 feet to a tangent curve concave Westerly with a radius of 1525 feet and a central angle of 11°49’17”;
Course 9: Thence northerly along said curve a distance of 314.64 feet; Course 10: Thence N11°57’50”W a distance of 1304.65 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave easterly with a radius of 1475.00 feet and a central angle of 11°49’17”; Course 11: Thence northerly along said curve a distance of 304.33 feet; Course 12: Thence N00°08’33”W a distance of 129.84 feet to a point on the North line of the Southeast quarter of said Section 19 and the termination of said easterly right of way of 9 ¼ Ave.; Course 13: Thence S89°46’01”E along the North line of said Southeast quarter a distance of 687.64 feet to the centerline of 9 ¼ Ave.;
Course 14: Thence S89°46’01”E along the North line of said Southeast quarter a distance of 933.30 feet to the centerline of 9 ¼ Ave. also being the East line of said Southeast quarter;
Course 15: Thence South 00˚08'55" East along the East line of said Southeast quarter, 2649.14 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 86.40 acres, more or less.
Parcel Map Check Report
Client: Prepared by:
Client Preparer
Client Company Your Company Name
Address 1 123 Main Street
Date: 7/2/2026 10:17:50 AM
Parcel Name: ANNEX
Description:
Process segment order counterclockwise: False
Enable mapcheck across chord: False
North:989.28' East:27,335.19'
Segment# 1: Line
Course: S0° 08' 55"E Length: 2,649.139'
North: -1,659.85' East: 27,342.07'
Segment# 2: Line
Course: N89° 20' 39"W Length: 997.379'
North: -1,648.44' East: 26,344.75'
Segment# 3: Line
Course: N84° 44' 20"W Length: 74.760'
North: -1,641.58' East: 26,270.31'
Segment# 4: Line
Course: N89° 20' 40"W Length: 111.598'
North: -1,640.30' East: 26,158.72'
Segment# 5: Line
Course: N84° 20' 16"W Length: 68.762'
North: -1,633.52' East: 26,090.29'
Segment# 6: Curve
Length: 46.706' Radius: 30.000'
Delta: 89°12'06" Tangent: 29.585'
Chord: 42.130' Course: N44° 44' 36"W
Course In: N0° 39' 21"E Course Out: S89° 51' 27"W
RP North: -1,603.52' East: 26,090.63'
End North: -1,603.60' East: 26,060.63'
Segment# 7: Line
Course: N4° 08' 13"W Length: 129.199'
North: -1,474.73' East: 26,051.31'
Segment# 8: Line
Course: N0° 08' 33"W Length: 450.030'
North: -1,024.70' East: 26,050.19'
Segment# 9: Curve
Length: 314.641' Radius: 1,525.000'
Delta: 11°49'17" Tangent: 157.881'
Chord: 314.084' Course: N6° 03' 11"W
Course In: S89° 51' 27"W Course Out: N78° 02' 10"E
RP North: -1,028.50' East: 24,525.20'
End North: -712.37' East: 26,017.07'
Segment# 10: Line
Course: N11° 57' 50"W Length: 1,304.651'
North: 563.94' East: 25,746.63'
Segment# 11: Curve
Length: 304.325' Radius: 1,475.000'
Delta: 11°49'17" Tangent: 152.705'
Chord: 303.786' Course: N6° 03' 11"W
Course In: N78° 02' 10"E Course Out: S89° 51' 27"W
RP North: 869.70' East: 27,189.59'
End North: 866.03' East: 25,714.59'
Segment# 12: Line
Course: N0° 08' 33"W Length: 129.840'
North: 995.87' East: 25,714.27'
Segment# 13: Line
Course: S89° 46' 01"E Length: 687.641'
North: 993.07' East: 26,401.90'
Segment# 14: Line
Course: S89° 46' 01"E Length: 933.302'
North: 989.28' East: 27,335.20'
Perimeter: 8,201.974' Area: 3,763,395.18Sq.Ft.
Error Closure: 0.00 Course: S72° 09' 37"E
Error North : -0.001 East: 0.002
Precision 1: 8,201,973,000.000
9 1/4 AVENUE
COURSE 13
ANNEXATION AREA86.40 ACRES
E1/4 CORSEC. 19-18/22
SE CORSEC. 19-18/22
LELAND WAY
EX. CITY LIMITS
S00°08'55"E 2649.14'
S89°46'01"E 687.64'
COURSE 15
COURSE 2COURSE 4COURSE 3COURSE 8COURSE 5
COURSE 9
COURSE 12
COURSE 10
COURSE 11
450.03'N00°08'33"W
R=1525.00'L=314.64'D=11°49'17"
R=1475.00'L=304.33'D=11°49'17"
N89°20'39"W 997.38'
N11°57'50"W 1304.65'
N00°08'33"W 129.84'
N84°44'20"W 74.76'N89°20'39"W 111.60'N84°20'18"W 68.76'COURSE 6R=30.00'L=46.71'D=89°12'06"COURSE 7N04°08'13"W 129.20' S89°51'27"W(R)
N78°02'10"E(R)
GRANGEVILLE BLVD.
COURSE 14S89°46'01"E 933.30'
N0°08'55"W 30.00'
CENTERSEC. 19-18/22S1/4 CORSEC. 19-18/22
PROPERTYLELAND WAY
ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF HANFORDANNEXATION NO. 2025 - __________ N
FERNWOOD DR.SUBJECT
HWY 43FARGO AVE
VICINITY MAP
400'0'SCALE: 1" = 400'200'
N
24186BBBM CITY OF HANFORD EXHIBIT B-1www.borumlandsurveying.com810 W. ACEQUIA ST.VISALIA, CA 93291 7-2-26CHECKED:DRAWN:DATE:PROJECT:
(SEE EXHIBIT B-2)
9 1/4 AVE.
Exhibit A
Geographic Description
City of Hanford
Annexation 2025-____
Annexation to the City of Hanford
That portion of the East Half of the Southeast quarter of Section 19, Township 18 South, Range 22 East, Mount Diablo Meridian in the County of Kings, State of California, described as follows:
Commencing at the Southeast quarter of said Section 19;
Course 1: Thence North 00˚08'55" West, along the East line of said Southeast quarter, 30.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
Course 2: Thence N89°20’39”W along said North right of way line a distance of 997.38 feet, thence continuing along said North right of way the following courses;
Course 3: Thence N84°44’20”W a distance of 74.76;
Course 4: Thence N89°20’39”W a distance of 110.60 feet;
Course 5: Thence N84°20’18”W a distance of 68.76 feet to the termination of said North right of way line and the beginning of a tangent curve concave Northeasterly with a radius of 30 feet and a central angle of 89°12’06”;
Course 6: Thence northerly along said curve a distance of 46.71 feet;
Course 7: Thence N04°08’13”W along the Easterly right of way of 9 ¼ Ave a distance of 129.20 feet thence continuing along said Easterly right of way the following courses;
Course 8: Thence N00°08’33”W a distance of 450.03 feet to a tangent curve concave Westerly with a radius of 1525 feet and a central angle of 11°49’17”;
Course 9: Thence northerly along said curve a distance of 314.64 feet;
Course 10: Thence N11°57’50”W a distance of 1304.65 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave easterly with a radius of 1475.00 feet and a central angle of 11°49’17”;
Course 11: Thence northerly along said curve a distance of 304.33 feet;
Course 12: Thence N00°08’33”W a distance of 129.84 feet to a point on the North line of the Southeast quarter of said Section 19 and the termination of said easterly right of way of 9 ¼ Ave.;
Course 13: Thence S89°46’01”E along the North line of said Southeast quarter a distance of 687.64 feet to the centerline of 9 ¼ Ave.;
Course 14: Thence S89°46’01”E along the North line of said Southeast quarter a distance of 933.30 feet to the centerline of 9 ¼ Ave. also being the East line of said Southeast quarter;
Course 15: Thence South 00˚08'55" East along the East line of said Southeast quarter, 2649.14 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 86.40 acres, more or less.
Parcel Map Check Report
Client: Prepared by:
Client Preparer
Client Company Your Company Name
Address 1 123 Main Street
Date: 7/2/2026 10:17:50 AM
Parcel Name: ANNEX
Description:
Process segment order counterclockwise: False
Enable mapcheck across chord: False
North:989.28' East:27,335.19'
Segment# 1: Line
Course: S0° 08' 55"E Length: 2,649.139'
North: -1,659.85' East: 27,342.07'
Segment# 2: Line
Course: N89° 20' 39"W Length: 997.379'
North: -1,648.44' East: 26,344.75'
Segment# 3: Line
Course: N84° 44' 20"W Length: 74.760'
North: -1,641.58' East: 26,270.31'
Segment# 4: Line
Course: N89° 20' 40"W Length: 111.598'
North: -1,640.30' East: 26,158.72'
Segment# 5: Line
Course: N84° 20' 16"W Length: 68.762'
North: -1,633.52' East: 26,090.29'
Segment# 6: Curve
Length: 46.706' Radius: 30.000'
Delta: 89°12'06" Tangent: 29.585'
Chord: 42.130' Course: N44° 44' 36"W
Course In: N0° 39' 21"E Course Out: S89° 51' 27"W
RP North: -1,603.52' East: 26,090.63'
End North: -1,603.60' East: 26,060.63'
Segment# 7: Line
Course: N4° 08' 13"W Length: 129.199'
North: -1,474.73' East: 26,051.31'
Segment# 8: Line
Course: N0° 08' 33"W Length: 450.030'
North: -1,024.70' East: 26,050.19'
Segment# 9: Curve
Length: 314.641' Radius: 1,525.000'
Delta: 11°49'17" Tangent: 157.881'
Chord: 314.084' Course: N6° 03' 11"W
Course In: S89° 51' 27"W Course Out: N78° 02' 10"E
RP North: -1,028.50' East: 24,525.20'
End North: -712.37' East: 26,017.07'
Segment# 10: Line
Course: N11° 57' 50"W Length: 1,304.651'
North: 563.94' East: 25,746.63'
Segment# 11: Curve
Length: 304.325' Radius: 1,475.000'
Delta: 11°49'17" Tangent: 152.705'
Chord: 303.786' Course: N6° 03' 11"W
Course In: N78° 02' 10"E Course Out: S89° 51' 27"W
RP North: 869.70' East: 27,189.59'
End North: 866.03' East: 25,714.59'
Segment# 12: Line
Course: N0° 08' 33"W Length: 129.840'
North: 995.87' East: 25,714.27'
Segment# 13: Line
Course: S89° 46' 01"E Length: 687.641'
North: 993.07' East: 26,401.90'
Segment# 14: Line
Course: S89° 46' 01"E Length: 933.302'
North: 989.28' East: 27,335.20'
Perimeter: 8,201.974' Area: 3,763,395.18Sq.Ft.
Error Closure: 0.00 Course: S72° 09' 37"E
Error North : -0.001 East: 0.002
Precision 1: 8,201,973,000.000
SITE
GRANGEVILLE BLVD
LOCAL STREETS
9 1/4 AVENUE
9TH AVENUE
DEVELOPER
PROJECT INFO
OWNER
PHASES INFO
4,140 SF
90'
46'
46'
90'
214
4,140 SF213
4,140 SF212
4,140 SF211
46'
46'
90'
46'
46'
90'
46'
46'
90'
4,140 SF210
46'
46'
90'
4,140 SF209
46'
46'
90'
4,140 SF208
46'
46'
90'
4,140 SF207
46'
46'
90'
4,140 SF206
46'
46'
90'
4,140 SF205
46'
46'
90'
4,140 SF204
46'
46'
90'
4,140 SF203
46'
46'
90'
4,140 SF202
46'
46'
90'
4,140 SF
90'
46'
90'
187
4,140 SF188
4,140 SF189
4,140 SF190
46'
90'
46'
90'
46'
90'
4,140 SF191
46'
90'
4,140 SF192
46'
90'
4,140 SF193
46'
90'
4,140 SF194
46'
90'
4,140 SF195
46'
90'
4,140 SF196
46'
90'
4,140 SF197
46'
90'
4,140 SF198
46'
90'
4,140 SF199
46'
90'
4,140 SF
90'
46'
46' 215 4,140 SF
90'
46'186
90'
4,230 SF273
47'
47'
90'
90'
4,230 SF270
47'
90'
90'
4,230 SF274
47'
47'
90'
4,230 SF269
47'
90'
4,230 SF275
47'
47'
90'
4,230 SF268
47'
90'
4,230 SF276
47'
47'
90'
4,230 SF267
47'
90'
4,230 SF277
47'
47'
90'
4,230 SF266
47'
90'
4,230 SF278
47'
47'
90'
4,230 SF265
47'
90'
4,230 SF243
47'
47'
90'
4,230 SF262
47'
90'
4,230 SF244
47'
47'
90'
4,230 SF261
47'
90'
4,230 SF245
47'
47'
90'
4,230 SF260
47'
90'
4,230 SF246
47'
47'
90'
4,230 SF259
47'
90'
4,230 SF247
47'
47'
90'
4,230 SF258
47'
90'
4,230 SF248
47'
47'
90'
4,230 SF257
47'
90'
4,230 SF249
47'
47'
90'
4,230 SF256
47'
90'
4,230 SF250
47'
47'
90'
4,230 SF255
47'
90'
4,230 SF251
47'
47'
90'
4,230 SF254
47'
90' 90'
94'
3,570 SF183
42'
85'
42'
85'
3,485 SF156
41'
85'
41'
85'
3,570 SF182
42'
85'
42'
3,570 SF181
42'
85'
42'
3,570 SF180
42'
85'
42'
3,570 SF179
42'
85'
42'
3,570 SF178
42'
85'
42'
3,570 SF177
42'
85'
42'
3,570 SF176
42'
85'
42'
3,570 SF175
42'
85'
42'
3,570 SF174
42'
85'
42'
3,570 SF173
42'
85'
42'
3,570 SF172
42'
85'
42'
3,570 SF171
42'
85'
42'
3,485 SF157
41'
85'
41'
3,485 SF158
41'
85'
41'
3,485 SF159
41'
85'
41'
3,485 SF160
41'
85'
41'
3,485 SF161
41'
85'
41'
3,485 SF162
41'
85'
41'
3,485 SF163
41'
85'
41'
3,485 SF164
41'
85'
41'
3,485 SF165
41'
85'
41'
3,485 SF166
41'
85'
41'
3,485 SF167
41'
85'
41'
3,485 SF168
41'
85'
41'
3,570 SF153
42'
85'
42'
85' 3,570 SF152
42'
85'
42'
3,570 SF151
42'
85'
42'
3,570 SF150
42'
85'
42'
3,570 SF149
42'
85'
42'
3,570 SF148
42'
85'
42'
3,570 SF147
42'
85'
42'
3,570 SF146
42'
85'
42'
3,570 SF145
42'
85'
42'
3,485 SF128
41'
85'
41'
85' 3,485 SF129
41'
85'
41'
3,485 SF130
41'
85'
41'
3,485 SF131
41'
85'
41'
3,485 SF132
41'
85'
41'
3,400 SF133
40'
85'
40'
3,400 SF134
40'
85'
40'
3,400 SF135
40'
85'
40'
3,400 SF136
40'
85'
40'
3,400 SF137
40'
85'
40'
3,400 SF138
40'
85'
40'
3,400 SF139
40'
85'
40'
3,485 SF144
41'
85'
41'
3,485 SF143
41'
85'
41'
3,485 SF142
41'
85'
41'
4,450 SF201 4,450 SF2004,450 SF272 4,450 SF271
4,525 SF279 4,525 SF264
4,990 SF242 4,990 SF263
4,990 SF252 4,990 SF253
4,569 SF216 4,569 SF185
4630 SF241
4,294 SF240
4,299 SF239
4,304 SF238
4,308 SF237
4,313 SF236
4,318 SF235
4,322 SF234
4,327 SF233
4,332 SF232
4680 SF231
3,775 SF184
3,775 SF155
3,775 SF154
3,775 SF127
2876 SF310
3,108 SF311
3,048 SF88
2,940 SF89
2,940 SF90
4,590 SF141
4,465 SF140
4,232 SF2994,237 SF2984,228 SF2974,219 SF2964,210 SF2954,200 SF2944,191 SF2934,182 SF2924,148 SF291 4,066 SF287
4,070 SF286
4,074 SF285
4,079 SF284
4,083 SF283
4,087 SF282
4,091 SF281
4,070 SF280
4,522 SF2244,226 SF2254,245 SF2264,263 SF2274,282 SF2284,300 SF2294,888 SF230 4,897 SF170
4,517 SF169
4,450 SF217
4,050 SF218
4,000 SF126
3,600 SF125
3,600 SF124
4,050 SF219
4,050 SF220
4,050 SF221
4,050 SF222
4,303 SF223
3,573 SF1153,953 SF1143,588 SF1163,602 SF1173,616 SF1183,624 SF119
SALEM DRIVE
SHERRY DRIVE
MOFFAT DRIVE
CLOVER LANE
HARRISON AVE
HAYES WAY
E. WATERVIEW ST
CAMBRIA ST
BODEGA LANE
N
E W
S
GRANGEVILLE BLVD
9 1/4 AVENUE
10TH AVENUE
PROJECTLOCATION
VICINITY MAPNOT TO SCALE
LELAND WAYGRANGEVILLE BLVD
HIGHWAY 43
80'
50'
R=20'14'
R=20'14'R=20'14'
R=20'14'
R=20'14' R=20'14'
R=20'
14'
R=20'
14'
R=20'
14'
R=20'
14'
R=20'
14'
R=20'11'
14'R=20' 14'R=20'
11'R=20'
14'R=20'
14'R=20'
14'R=20'
R=20'
14'
R=20'
14'
R=20'
14'
R=20'14'
R=20'
14'
R=20'
14'
R=20'
14'
R=20'11'
R=20'
14'
R=20'
14'
R=20'
40'
89'
89'
89'
90'
90'
40'40'40'40'
45'45'45'45'45'45'45'45'
45' 45'45'45'45'45'45'46'47'47'47'47'47'47'47'47'
46'
51'
56'
46'
46'
46'
49'62'
55'
36'
51'
45'61'
35'
R=20'14'
45'
80'80' 80'
80' 80'
80' 80'
80' 80'
80' 80'
80' 80'
42'35'
80'
81'
90'
90'
90'
90'
90'
90'
90'
91'
91'
91'
91'
91'
91'
91'
92'
92'
92'
71'
94'
93'
93'
93'
93'
93'
92'
89'
35'
35'
35'
35'
40'40' 35'
90'
90'
90'
90'
90'
90'
90'
45'45'45'45'45'48' 40' 41'
41'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
40'
46'
46'
57'
66'
40'40'
42'45'
86'
45'45'45'45'45'45'45'
40'
40'
47'
46'47'47'47'47'47'47'47'47'47'46'
45'45' 45'45'45'45'47'
78'
90'
90'
90'
92'
92'
92'
93'
93'
42' 40'
91'
81'
84'
70'70'70' 42'42'42'
74'
78'
74'
78'
35'
45'40'40'40'40'40'
42'42'
50'46'52'
R=20'
R=20'
R=30'R=20' R=20'
R=20'
R=20'
R=20'
R=20' R=20'
21'
15'
21'
28'28'28' 28'
NOT-A-PART
LELAND WAY
GRANGEVILLE BLVD
9TH AVENUE
15'
15' 43'41'
45'
75'75'75'75'
45'
50'
40'
45'45'45'45'45'45'45'
46' 46' 46' 46'
46' 46' 46' 46'
50'50'56'
CITY STANDARDBLOCK WALL
CITY STANDARDBLOCK WALL
CITY STANDARDBLOCK WALL
CITY STANDARDBLOCK WALL
CITY STANDARDBLOCK WALLCITY STANDARDBLOCK WALL
CITY STANDARDBLOCK WALL
CITY STANDARDBLOCK WALL
CITY STANDARDBLOCK WALL
OUTLOT F (10' WIDE)OUTLOT E (10' WIDE)
OUTLOT E (10' WIDE)OUTLOT D (10' WIDE)OUTLOT C (10' WIDE) OUTLOT I (10' WIDE)
OUTLOT H (10' WIDE)
OUTLOT G (10' WIDE)
OUTLOT G (10' WIDE)9 1/4 AVENUE
70' 2,940 SF47
42'
70'
42'
2,940 SF48
42'
70'
42'
2,940 SF49
42'
70'
42'
2,940 SF50
42'
70'
42'
2,940 SF51
42'
70'
42'
2,940 SF52
42'
70'
42'
2,940 SF53
42'
70'
42'
2,940 SF54
42'
70'
42'
2,940 SF55
42'
70'
42'
2,940 SF56
42'
70'
42'
70' 3,010 SF68
43'
70'
43'
67 43'
70'
43'
66 43'
70'
43'
65 43'
70'
43'
64 43'
70'
43'
63 43'
70'
43'
62 43'
70'
43'
61 43'
70'
43'
60 43'
70'
43'
59 43'
70'
43'
3,100 SF46
3,100 SF69 3,841 SF58
3,550 SF57
R=20'14'
R=20'
14'
R=20'
14'
35'
35'
14'R=20'
45' 48'58'
35'
51'
60'60'
59'
63'
3,010 SF3,010 SF3,010 SF3,010 SF3,010 SF3,010 SF3,010 SF3,010 SF3,010 SF
LELAND WAY
70'
3,010 SF18
43'
70'
43'
70'
3,010 SF19
43'
43'
70'
3,010 SF20
43'
43'
70'
3,010 SF21
43'
43'
70'
3,010 SF22
43'
43'
3,010 SF17
43'
70'
43'
3,010 SF16
43'
70'
43'
3,010 SF15
43'
70'
43'
3,010 SF14
43'
70'
43'
3,010 SF13
43'
70'
43'
90'
4,140 SF8
46'
46'
90'
90'
4,140 SF7
46'
46'
90'
4,140 SF6
46'
46'
90'
4,140 SF5
46'
46'
90'
4,140 SF4
46'
46'
90'
4,140 SF3
46'
46'
90'
4,140 SF2
46'
46'
45'
45'
90'
4,050 SF9
45'
45'
90'
4,050 SF10
70'
42'
2,940 SF32570'
42'
70'
42'
2,940 SF326
42'
70'
42'
2,940 SF327
42'
70'
42'
2,940 SF328
42'
70'
42'
2,940 SF329
42'
70'
42'
2,940 SF330
42'
61'
70'
42'
2,940 SF7670'
70'
42'
2,940 SF75
70'
42'
2,940 SF74
70'
42'
2,940 SF73
70'
42'
2,940 SF72
70'
42'
2,940 SF71
42'
2,940 SF7770'
42'
42'
2,940 SF7870'
42'
41'
2,870 SF7970'
41'
41'
2,870 SF8070'
41'
41'
2,870 SF8170'
41'
70' 42
43'
70'
43'
3,010 SF
70' 43
43'
43'
3,010 SF
70' 44
43'
43'
3,010 SF 41
43'
70'
43'
3,010 SF40
43'
70'
43'
3,010 SF39
43'
70'
43'
3,010 SF38
43'
70'
43'
3,010 SF37
43'
70'
43'
3,010 SF36
43'
70'
43'
3,010 SF
70'
41'
2,870 SF2570'
41'
41'
2,870 SF2670'
41'
41'
2,870 SF2770'
41'
41'
2,870 SF2870'
41'
41'
2,870 SF2970'
41'
41'
2,870 SF3070'
41'
42'
2,940 SF3370'
42'
3,100 SF23
45'4,720 SF1
53'
3,849 SF12
49'59'4,803 SF11
45 45'
3,100 SF
243,100 SF
35 49'
3,920 SF
3,656 SF34
64'
45'
3,100 SF331
3,100 SF70
5,784 SF290
9,239 SF289
5,710 SF288
3,133 SF82
64'
71'2,874 SF309
40'
40'
71'2,866 SF308
40'
40'
71'2,859 SF307
40'
40'
71'2,852 SF306
40'
40'
71'2,853 SF305
40'
40'
72'2,919 SF304
40'
40'
74'3,065 SF303
40'
40'
79'3,290 SF302
40'
40'
85'3,561 SF301
40'
40'
3,748 SF300
5,415 SF12010,148 SF121
4,730 SF122
3,552 SF123
2,940 SF9170'
42'
42'
2,940 SF9270'
42'
42'
2,940 SF9370'
42'
42'
2,940 SF9470'
42'
42'
3,478 SF11086'
40'
40'
3,492 SF11187'
40'
40'
3,506 SF11287'
40'
40'
3,912 SF113 5,059 SF109
3,089 SF95
3,223 SF96
3,389 SF97
3,401 SF98
3,400 SF99
3,400 SF100
3,615 SF101
3,218 SF102
3,570 SF103
3,570 SF104
3,570 SF105
3,570 SF106
3,570 SF107
4,592 SF108
OUTLOT G (10' WIDE)
43'
35'
60'80'
61'82'
51'
42'
R=20'
14'
R=20'
14'
R=20'
14'
R=20'14'
R=20'14'R=20'14'
R=20'14'
R=20'
14'
R=20'14'
14'R=20'
14'R=20'
11'R=20'
14'R=20'
14'R=20'
14'R=20'
60'
35'
60'
35'
69'
61'
33'
54'
35'
35'
60'60'
45'42'42'42'42'42'42'45'
36'42'
42'
76'83'85'85'85'85'69'
40'40'40'40'40'35'
40'
40'40'40'40'35'79'
35'
35'
85'85'85'85'85'86'
R=20'27'
R=20'24'
85'82'
89'60'
42'42'42'42'42'41'
42'42'42'42'42'
95'
62'
62'
45'
87'
78'
35'
45'
80'
89'
84'87'
90'
40'42'
52'
46'
40'74'82'
48'
48'
88' 90'
91' 66'
93'
49'
38'
36'
91'
89'
14'R=20'
R=20'
14'
R=20'
R=20'
R=20'
R=20'
R=20'
14'R=20'
28'
8' MEANDERINGWALK
4,039 SF341
3,762 SF342
3,975 SF343
4,276 SF344
5,396 SF345
3750 SF337
91' 96' 102'
46'
40'
40' 40' 40' 37'
111'
138'
88'
37'
38'
69'
5,494 SF332
4,399 SF333
4,394 SF334
4,116 SF335
4,079 SF336
R=20'
R=20'
14'R=20'
96'98'96'92'80'
R=20'28' 39'
40'
43'
44'
45'
45'
45'
45'
68'
47'
95'
40' 40' 55'
N
CITY STANDARDMEDIAN
CITY STANDARDMEDIAN
42'
2,940 SF32470'
42'
2,940 SF87
3,034 SF86
3,446 SF85
3,282 SF84
R=20'14' R=20'
14'
TEMPORARY STORM BASIN ESM'T(18.7 REQ'D/20.5 ACRE FEET PROV'D)-PRIVATE OWNED
CITY STANDARDBLOCK WALL
8' MEANDERINGWALK
8' MEANDERINGWALK
8' MEANDERINGWALK
BIKE LANESTRIPING
BIKE LANESTRIPING
BIKE LANESTRIPING
BIKE LANESTRIPING
42' 42' 42'
70' 70' 71'
42' 44' 51'
42'
2,940 SF3270'
42'
42'
2,940 SF3170'
42'
76'
42' 41' 41' 41' 37'
2,940 SF32370' 2,870 SF32270' 2,870 SF32170' 2,870 SF32070' 2,119 SF319 3,055 SF3123,063 SF3133,071 SF3143,079 SF3153,448 SF316 6,103 SF317 5,619 SF318
4,128 SF83
70'
63'
79' 77'
102'
42' 42' 42' 42' 49'
50'
42' 44' 45'
42' 61' 95'
103'
42'42' 42' 42' 49' 114'
CONVENIENCE
4,899 SF
FOOD B2,318 SF
FOOD A2,153 SF
R=20' R=20'28'
4,034 SF338
3,601 SF346
3,570 SF347
3,570 SF348
3,570 SF349
3,570 SF350
BUILD. #8
BUILD. #9
BUILD. #10
BUILD. #11
BUILD. #12
BUILD. #13
BUILD. #14
BUILD. #17
BUILD. #18
BUILD. #15
BUILD. #16
BUILD. #19
BUILD. #10
BUILD. #21
AUNIT UNITB
BUILDING #6UNITB
BUILDING #5
AUNIT UNITB
BUILDING #4
AUNIT UNITB
BUILDING #3
AUNITUNITB BUILDING #7
BUNIT UNITA
BUILDING #8
UNITBAUNITAUNITUNITB BUILDING #9BUILDING #10
UNITBAUNITAUNITUNITBUNITBAUNIT
BUNITUNITABUNIT UNITABUNITUNITABUNIT UNITABUNITUNITA
BUNIT UNITABUNITUNITA BUNIT UNITABUNITUNITA
AUNITUNITBUNITBAUNITAUNITUNITBUNITBAUNITAUNITUNITBUNITBAUNIT BUILDING #11BUILDING #12
BUILDING #18
BUILDING #19
BUILDING #17BUILDING #16BUILDING #15BUILDING #14BUILDING #13 BUILDING #24 BUILDING #23 BUILDING #22 BUILDING #21 BUILDING #20 BUILDING #10BUILDING #10BUILDING #25BUILDING #26BUILDING #5
BUNIT UNITABUNITUNITA
BUILDING #6
AUNITUNITBUNITBAUNIT
BUILDING #23BUILDING #22
AUNITUNITBUNITBAUNIT
BUILDING #15BUILDING #14AUNITUNITBUNITBAUNIT
BUILDING #13BUILDING #12AUNITUNITB BUILDING #11AUNITUNITB BUILDING #10
BUNIT UNITABUNITUNITA
BUILDING #16BUILDING #17
BUNIT UNITABUNITUNITA
BUILDING #18BUILDING #19
BUNIT UNITA
BUILDING #20
BUNIT UNITA
BUILDING #21
BUILD. #8
5,367 SF339
6,740 SF340
RETAIL A14,165 SFRETAIL B14,165 SF
OUTLOT Z0.18 AC
PRIVATE OPENSPACE5,550 SFPOOL
PRIVATECOMMUNITYCENTER
42'42'42' 42' 42'
42'42'42' 42' 42'
85'
85'
85'
85'
85'
85' 85'
135'
40'
79'
61'
81'
40'
118'
40'
40'
R=20'
R=20'
R=20'
R=20'
R=20'
R=20'
121'
82'
12'
10'
14'
14'
6,075 SF3536,165 SF3546,165 SF3556,165 SF3566,165 SF3576,165 SF3586,165 SF3596,165 SF3606,165 SF3616,165 SF3626,165 SF3636,165 SF3646,165 SF3656,165 SF3666,165 SF3676,568 SF368 6,840 SF369
6,850 SF370
6,115 SF371
10,062 SF372 6,332 SF373 6,960 SF374 7,425 SF375 7,572 SF376 7,159 SF377 7,209 SF378 6,702 SF379 11,540 SF380 6,552 SF381
7,260 SF382
7,482 SF383 7,621 SF384
6,438 SF385
6,438 SF386
8,167 SF387
AUNITUNITB BUILDING #22
AUNITUNITB
BUILDING #23
PROPERTY LINE
COMMON DRIVE
TYP. ONE STORY DUPLEX SITE(LOTS 351-387)
BUILD. #8
BUILD. #9
BUILD. #7
SIDEWALK SIDEWALK
PROPERTY LINE
SIDEWALK
PARKING STALLS
SIDEWALK
TYP. TWO STORY 8-PLEX SITE
PRIVATE ROAD
90'
68.5' 68.5'
68.5' 68.5'
90'
68.5'
68.5'
90'
68.5'
68.5'
90'
68.5'
68.5'
90'
68.5'
68.5'
90'
68.5'
68.5'
90'
68.5'
68.5'
90'
68.5'
68.5'
90'
68.5'
68.5'
90'
68.5'
68.5'
90'
68.5'
68.5'
90'
68.5'
68.5'
90'
68.5'
68.5'
90'
68.5'
68.5'
90'
63.5'
73'
80' 28'
R=20'11'81'
90'
89'
63'
95'
95' 85'
85'
85'75' 75'
72' 75' 61'
92'
91'
77'
94'
94'
95'
83'
81'
104'75'75'81' 95'75'75'90'
95'75'75'80'
85'
76'79'
68'
23'
10'
68'
75'71' 62'
71'71'75'
24'
11'
69' 75' 75' 97'
100' 75' 75' 80' 81' 75' 75' 75' 109'
40'
67'
40'
83'
BUNIT UNITA
BUILDING #25
AUNITUNITBUNITBAUNIT
BUILDING #11BUILDING #12AUNITUNITBUNITBAUNIT
BUILDING #11BUILDING #12AUNITUNITBUNITBAUNIT
BUILDING #11BUILDING #12
AUNITUNITB BUILDING #15
BUNIT UNITA
BUILDING #16
BUILDING #5
BUNIT UNITABUNITUNITA
BUILDING #6
6,147 SF3526,162 SF351
PRIVATE OPENSPACE6,684 SF
PRIVATE OPENSPACE11,518 SF
PRIVATE OPENSPACE13,696 SF
PRIVATEOPEN SPACE4,000 SF
BARRICADES
CRESCENT LANE
SONOMA AVE
VISITORPARKING SPACES
VISITORPARKING SPACES VISITORPARKING SPACES
PUBLIC STREET
PARKING INFO
OUTLOT B (10' WIDE)
OUTLOT A (10' WIDE)
R=20'R=20'
R=30' R=20' R=20'
50'100'200'
156'
88'81'
75'
75'
82' 74'
77'
47'
43'
RELINQUISHMENTOF ACCESSRIGHTS
RELINQUISHMENTOF ACCESSRIGHTS
RELINQUISHMENTOF ACCESSRIGHTS
RELINQUISHMENTOF ACCESSRIGHTS
RELINQUISHMENTOF ACCESSRIGHTS
RELINQUISHMENT OF ACCESS RIGHTS
RELINQUISHMENTOF ACCESSRIGHTS
PROVIDE A 1' RESERVESTRIP ALONG LELANDWAY
PROVIDE A 1'RESERVE STRIPALONG 9THAVENUE
CANYON CREEK ST.
E. WATERVIEW ST
CANYON CREEK ST.
HAYES WAY
MOFFAT DR
SALEM DRIVE
E DONNYBROOK PL
SONOMA AVE
CARMEL DR
CRESCENT LANE
256.5'
256'
256'
256'256'
254'
256'
254'
254'254'
254'
(E)8" WATER
(E)12" STORMDRAIN
(E)8" WATER
(E)24" STORMDRAIN
S89° 53' 06.00"W422'+/-
S89° 53' 06.00"W240'+/-S89° 53' 06.00"W181'+/-
S89° 53' 06.00"W240'+/-S89° 53' 06.00"W
240'+/-
S89° 53' 06.00"W318'+/-S89° 53' 06.00"W250'+/-
S89° 53' 06.00"W557'+/-
S89° 53' 06.00"W563'+/-
S89° 53' 06.00"W507'+/-S89° 53' 06.00"W220'+/-
S89° 53' 06.00"W240'+/-
S89° 53' 06.00"W628'+/-
S89° 53' 06.00"W305+/-S89° 53' 06.00"W323+/-
S89° 53' 06.00"W208+/-S89° 53' 06.00"W232+/-S89° 53' 06.00"W565+/-S89° 53' 06.00"W180+/- N00° 06' 54"W575'+/-N00° 06' 54"W230'+/-
N00° 06' 54"W362'+/- N00° 06' 54"W442'+/-
N00° 06' 54"W442'+/-N00° 06' 54"W595'+/-
N00° 06' 54"W198'+/-N00° 06' 54"W200'+/-N00° 06' 54"W200'+/- N00° 06' 54"W244'+/- N00° 06' 54"W232'+/-
N00° 06' 54"W230'+/-
N00° 06' 54"W374'+/-
N00° 06' 54"W240'+/-
N00° 06' 54"W240'+/-
S89° 53' 06.00"W242'+/- S89° 53' 06.00"W322'+/-
S89° 53' 06.00"W182'+/-
R800'
R687'
N00° 06' 54"W166'+/-
N00° 06' 54"W144'+/-
R3692'
R977'
R644'
R797'
R372'
R319'
R170'
124+/-
230'+/-
190'+/-
241'+/-
N00° 06' 54"W151'+/-
CITY OF HANFORDSTORM DRAIN ESMTINST NO. 1319097
STORM DRAINSEWER
STORM DRAINSEWER
STORM DRAINSEWER
STORM DRAINSEWER
STORM DRAINSEWER
STORM DRAINSEWER
STORM DRAINSEWER
STORM DRAINSEWER
STORM DRAINSEWER
STORM DRAINSEWER
STORM DRAINSEWER
STORM DRAINSEWER
STORM DRAINSEWER
STORM DRAINSEWER
STORM DRAINSEWER
STORM DRAINSEWER
STORM DRAINSEWER
STORM DRAINSEWER
SS SD
SSSSSSSSSS
SS SS SS
SS SSSS
SS SSSSSS
SSSSSSSS
SS
SSSS
SS
SS
SS
SSSS SS
SS
SS SSSS
SS
SS
SSSS
SS
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATERSTORM DRAINSEWER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATERSTORM DRAINSEWER
WATER
STORM DRAINSEWER
WATER
SS
SS
SS
WATER
WATER
SEWER
UNPLOTTABLE EASEMENTS
SEWER
WATER
SDSD
SD
SD SDSD
SDSD
SD
SD SD
SD SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD SDSD
SD SD
SD
SD
SCE EASEMENT DOC NO. 0409889,STRIP NO. 1 6' WIDESCE EASEMENTDOC NO. 0409889,STRIP NO. 26' WIDE SCE EASEMENTDOC NO. 0409889,STRIP NO. 316' WIDE
SS
SS
SS
E1/4 CORSEC. 19-18/22
SE CORSEC. 19-18/22
S00°08'55"E 2649.14'
S89°46'01"E 1620.94'
COURSE 9
COURSE 7
450.03'N00°08'33"W
R=1525.00'L=314.64'D=11°49'17"
R=1475.00'L=304.33'D=11°49'17"
N89°20'39"W 711.08'
N11°57'50"W 1304.65'
N84°44'20"W 74.76'
N84°20'18"W 68.76'
R=30.00'L=46.71'D=89°12'06"
N04°08'13"W 129.20'
S89°51'27"W(R)
N78°02'10"E(R)
S00°08'55"E 2223.10'
286.30'426.04'
N89°20'39"W 111.60'
TEMPORARY BUILDING RESTRICTIONS
R=52'
R=68'
R=68'
R=52'
R=68'
R=68'
R=52'
R=68'
R=68'
R=52'
R=68'
R=68'
R=52'
R=68'
R=68'
R=52'R=68'
R=68'
S78° 03' 49"W163'
S78° 03' 49"W159' INSTALL BLOCKWALLINSTALL BLOCKWALL
INSTALL BLOCKWALLINSTALL BLOCKWALL
OUTLOT Y323SF
OUTLOT X375SF
OUTLOT W368SF
OUTLOT V378SF
OUTLOT T423SF
OUTLOT U412SF INSTALLBLOCK WALLINSTALLBLOCK WALL
OUTLOT T213SFOUTLOT U310SF
INSTALLBLOCK WALL
INSTALLBLOCK WALL
70'
70'
70'
72'
OUTLOT S1717SF
ALTERNATIVE STORM WATER BASIN
OUTLOT Q378SF
OUTLOT R381SF
INSTALLBLOCK WALL
FUTURE R/W
SEWER BYOTHERS
ROUND ABOUTBY OTHERS
OUTLOT O386SF
INSTALLBLOCK WALL
OUTLOT O382SF
CITY STANDARDBLOCK WALLOUTLOT F (10' WIDE) BY THE CITY ENGINEER
SEWER TO LACEYBY OTHERS
ALT. INSTALLAC DIKE
WATERLINE SIZE TBD
BY THE CITY ENGINEERWATERLINE SIZE TBD
RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION TO BEDETERMINED BY CITY ENGINEER 14' ONE WAY LANE9' SHOULDER
24'
1'
PHASE 1PHASE 2
PHASE 2
PHASE 3
PHASE 3
PHASE 4
PHASE 5
FORINC. 1891CLAIRNIAYCTIOFOFNAHDPLAN FOR SERVICES - WATER
FORINC. 1891CLAIRNIAYCTIOFOFNAHDPLAN FOR SERVICES - SANITARY SEWER
FORINC. 1891CLAIRNIAYCTIOFOFNAHDPLAN FOR SERVICES - STORM DRAIN
Notice of Determination- 2025-73; 2024121093
To: 0 Office of Planning and Research
P.O. Box 3044, Room 212
Sacramento, CA 95812-3044
1:s1 County Clerk
County of Kings
Kings County Government Center
Hanford, CA 93230
From: City of Hanford - Gabrielle Myers, Senior Planner (559)585-2578 317 North Douty Street
Hanford, CA 93230
Subject: Filing of Notice of Determination in Compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code
Lead Agency: City of Hanford Responsible Agency: n/a
Project Title: Copper Ridge Mixed Use Project (ANX 165, GPA 0009-24, PRZ00 13-24, TSM0012-24 [TT945], PUD0037-24)
ORIGINAL
FILED
JAN 2 7 2026
KRISTINE LEE
KINGS COUNTY CLERK
I declare, under penalty of perjury, that on the date
below I posted a copy of this notice in the office of
the County Clerk that said notice remained posted
for 30 days. l / Date 12 7 20 "L-C:, KRISTINE LEE, County Clerk Recorder By ~ Deputy
Applicant: N&M Tulare, LLC
1878 N. Mooney Blvd
Tulare, CA 93274
Project Location - City: Hanford Project Location - County:~ Project Location - The Project site is located north of Grangeville Boulevard and east of 9 ¼Avenue.The development site includes two parcels, comprising 83.61 acres (APNs 014-143-069 and 014-143-078). The additional Annexation Area encompasses 58.24 acres (APNs 014-143-022, 014-830-011, 014-830-010, 014-830-013, 014-830-014, 014-830-015, 014-830-016, 014-830-017, 014-830- 018).
Project Description: Annexation165 is a request to annex approximately 141.85 acres into the City of Hanford City Limits from the Kings County Jurisdiction. The annexation area is a combination of the Project Site (83.61 acres) and an area to the north, not proposed to be developed at this time (58.24 acres). General Plan Amendment No. 0009-24 is a request to change the land use designation from a combination of Low- and Medium-Density Residential to Medium-Density Residential (78.16 acres) and Neighborhood Mixed Use (5.45 acres) for 83.61 acres of the project site. Prezone No. 0013-24: a request to prezone the properties as a R-M Medium-Density Residential (78.16 acres) and MX-N Neighborhood Mixed Use (5.45 acres), consistent with the proposed General Plan Amendment and R-L-5 Low-Density Residential (51.92 acres) and C-N Neighborhood Commercial (6.32 acres), consistent with the General Plan Designation. Tentative Subdivision Map 00012-24: a request to subdivide 83.61 acres of the annexation area into a 650-unit multi family (300 units) and single-family (350 units) residential subdivision and a 5.45-acre Neighborhood Mixed Use site with a planned unit development overlay. Planned Unit Development No. 0037-24: a request to allow various deviations from the regulation of the R-M Medium-Density Residential zone district for the mixed use subdivision, proposed under Tentative Tract 945, including reduced lot size, lot width, lot depth, site area per dwelling unit requirements, setbacks, open space dimensions, and allow removal of the block wall requirement between MX-N Neighborhood Mixed Use and R-M Medium-Density Residential.
This is to advise that the City of Hanford City Council, Lead Agency, has approved the above described project on January 20, 2026 and has made the following determination regarding the above described project:
1. The project (0 will l:sl will not] have a significant effect on the environment.
2. 0 An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
3. l:sl A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
4. Mitigation measures [l:si were O were not] made a condition of the approval of the project.
5. A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan [l:si was O was not] adopted for this project.
6. A statement of Overriding Considerations (0 was l:sl was not] adopted for this project.
7. Findings [l:si were O were not] made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval, or the Negative Declaration, or Mitigated Negative Declaration is available to the General Public at City of Hanford, Community Development Department, 317 N. Douty Street, Hanford, CA 93230.
:2~ fv\)~ J: Jason Waters, Deputy Cify Manager
January 26. 2026
Date Date received for filing at OPR
J ' f
Applicant Information:
Name: Barrett Nunley. L&M Tulare. LLC
Address: 1878 N. Mooney Boulevard, Tulare, CA 93274
Phone Number: (559)799-6990
14.A.
AGENDA
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: 8/4/2026 AGENDA SECTION: GENERAL BUSINESS
SUBJECT:
Receive a presentation on the "It's Not Worth It" Illegal Fireworks Campaign and appropriate $11,000 for continuation of the campaign for media and outreach costs from the General Fund for fiscal year 2026/2027; and establish an ongoing policy to continue the campaign for a total estimated cost of $49,000 to be budgeted next fiscal year to be offset by citation revenues.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council receive a presentation on the "It's Not Worth It" Illegal Fireworks Campaign and appropriate $11,000 for continuation of the campaign for media and outreach costs from the General Fund for fiscal year 2026/2027; and establish an ongoing policy to continue the campaign for a total estimated cost of $49,000 to be budgeted next fiscal year to be offset by citation revenues.
Recommended Motion: I motion for City Council to receive a presentation on the "It's Not Worth It" Illegal Fireworks Campaign and appropriate $11,000 for continuation of the campaign for media and outreach costs from the General Fund for fiscal year 2026/2027; and establish an ongoing policy to continue the campaign for a total estimated cost of $49,000 to be budgeted next fiscal year to be offset by citation revenues.
BACKGROUND:
In September of 2025, City Council approved the "It's Not Worth It" Campaign, providing $60,000 in funding to deter the usage of illegal fireworks during the 4th of July weekend within city limits. This provided an increase in staffing for Hanford Fire (HFD) and Hanford Police (HPD) personnel to further monitor and assist with the increase in call volume during the 4th of July weekend. As well as allowing Hanford Fire personnel, with assistance from the Code Compliance Division, to issue administrative citations for the distribution, selling, possession and usage of illegal fireworks.
Including the usage of sane fireworks outside the permissible timeframes. With each infraction resulting in a $1,000 administrative citation for a total of up to $10,000 per day.
Throughout the 4th of July weekend from July 3rd to July 5th, HFD received a total of 128 calls, with 87 of those calls pertaining to fireworks. Reflecting an 18% overall call volume increase in comparison to 2025. With the increase in activity throughout the 4thof July weekend, there were 10 fires of significance with 8 fires being directly attributed to illegal fireworks.
Although the calls increased, the manner in which the calls were prioritized and handled was
significantly different from previous years. This year marked the second time and more successful effort of implementing enforcement of illegal fireworks activity via unmanned aerial vehicles (drone) usage.
For perspective, HFD staff were able to count the total number of illegal fireworks on July 4th between the hours of 8pm and 12am. In those 4 hours, the northern area that comprised all areas of the city north of Lacey Blvd had 126 illegal fireworks visible by drones. In contrast, the area south of Lacey on July 4th between the hours of 8pm and 12am had 221 illegal fireworks visible by drones.
To ensure staff safety and avoid escalating conflict, staff used drones to locate and capture evidence of who and where the usage of illegal fireworks was taking place. The ability for HFD staff to issue administrative citations was limited to the total number of concurrent fireworks being ignited at any one time (i.e. more fireworks simultaneously not enough drones to capture the activity). This was due to the drone operator needing to be in close enough proximity for a long enough time to gather sufficient video evidence that tied the fireworks to a specific address.
During the 4th of July weekend, Hanford Fire staff issued 34 administrative citations, totaling $105,000 (see attachment 1 for the breakdown). Since then, HFD staff utilized the Geographic Information System Database to locate the mailing address of the property owners where the illegal activity was taking place and has mailed all issued administrative citations accordingly. With the assistance of the Finance Department, Community Development Department and the City Clerk’s Office, staff will be working with the constituents who have received citations to develop their options for payment or go through the appeal process. Including, the option of a 3-month payment plan as needed by the constituents. Staff will also be mailing a 30-day notice to delinquent accounts before further collection efforts are made.
Additionally, staff will be making efforts to communicate with homeowners who are leasing their property to tenants to ensure they are aware of these enforcement efforts, as ultimately they will be held responsible for any violations of the Hanford Municipal Code that occur on their property. Such as the implementation of lease agreements identifying who the responsible party will be if such instances were to happen.
Year one of the "It’s Not Worth It" Campaign proved to be fruitful. HFD successfully flew drones, captured footage of illegal fireworks activity and was able to process the footage creating evidence to back up the administrative citations that were sent to the property owners found to have the illegal fireworks activity on their property. All with no injuries or violent incidents as had been the result of similar efforts in previous years attempting to curtail this illegal activity.
The "It's Not Worth It" Campaign also came in under budget from the original $60,000 City Council approved; approximately $38,628.55 was utilized resulting in a remaining balance of approximately $21,371.45. This was primarily due to higher budget estimates for HPD overtime costs, HFD overtime costs for investigators and social media expenses. Staff will be utilizing the remaining monies to purchase a new drone, drone accessories, drone operator certification and a reusable "It's Not Worth It" Campaign banner if Council approves the continuance of the campaign.
Below is the breakdown of the projected revenues from citations issued and total known expenditures:
Revenue
34 Administrative Citations Total $ 105,000.00
Total Revenue $ 105,000.00
Expenditures
HFD Overtime Cost $ 20,482.52
HPD Overtime Cost $ 4,031.52
Disposable Yard Signs $ 5,128.34
Annual Drone License $ 5,000.00
Apparatus Equipment $ 1,471.85
Printing & Outreach Material Costs $ 1,200.00
Miscellaneous Items $ 1,314.32
Total Expenses $ 38,628.55
Net Total $ 66,371.45
Lastly, if Council desires to continue the 4th of July "Its Not Worth It" campaign, staff requests an appropriation of $11,000 from the General Fund in fiscal year 2026/2027 to fund media and outreach costs. Staff also requests that $38,000 for personnel overtime be included in the fiscal year 2028 General Fund budget during the upcoming budget development process. The total campaign cost of $49,000 is to be offset by citation revenue. Continuing the campaign will enhance the City's ability to identify, investigate, and enforce illegal fireworks violations.
FISCAL IMPACT:
To prepare for the next 4th of July, an appropriation of $11,000 for media and outreach costs from the General Fund is requested for the current fiscal year 2027.
For continuation of the campaign in fiscal year 2027/2028, an estimated total budget of $49,000 will be required, which may be offset by citation revenue. Staff will draft campaign costs into the future budget for City Council approval in June 2027. This estimated budget would include costs of materials, supplies, and personnel costs (including overtime).
The costs in this fiscal year and future budget years may be offset by citation revenues (if cited and collected). Any collected citation revenue could offset the costs of the campaign and will help the City maintain a balanced General Fund budget while working to improve health, safety, and quality of life for the community. Should citation revenue exceed the total cost of the campaign, any remaining revenue could be used to offset the Recreation and Community Services Department's Fourth of July fireworks event, further reducing the impact on the General Fund.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. HFD 2026 Illegal Firework Citations
Citation Amount Number of Citations Monetary Total
1,000.00$ 16 16,000.00$
2,000.00$ 7 14,000.00$
3,000.00$ 1 3,000.00$
4,000.00$ 2 8,000.00$
5,000.00$ 2 10,000.00$
6,000.00$ 0 -$
7,000.00$ 1 7,000.00$
8,000.00$ 1 8,000.00$
9,000.00$ 1 9,000.00$
10,000.00$ 3 30,000.00$
Total 34 105,000.00$
AGENDA
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: 8/4/2026 AGENDA SECTION: GENERAL BUSINESS
SUBJECT:
Receive a presentation and provide direction on future July 4th events. If a future July 4th event is desired, appropriate $77,000 from the General Fund, to be offset by event revenue, including but not limited to ticket sales, sponsorships, illegal firework citations, and vendor sales.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommendation: Council receives the presentation and provides staff direction on future July 4th events. If a future July 4th event is desired, appropriate $77,000 from the General Fund, to be offset by event revenue including but not limited to ticket sales, sponsorships, illegal firework citations and vendor sales.
Recommended Motion: I move to proceed with planning the July 4th 2027 Freedom Fest and appropriate $77,000 from the General Fund, to be offset by event revenue, including but not limited to ticket sales, sponsorships, illegal firework citations and vendor sales.
BACKGROUND:
For a first-time event, the overwhelming consensus from the community has been very positive regarding the Freedom Fest and Fireworks event that took place on July 4th at the Hanford Softball Complex. 3,701 people attended the event despite regional competition from surrounding communities. The venue proved to be a good fit for this event by providing ample space for parking, food vendors, restroom facilities, Kidz Zone play area, and live entertainment.
The live entertainment was kicked off by Travis Brooks, followed by Tammy Pemerton's line dancing.
Mayor Kairis welcomed the crowd and introduced the main act, In-Kahootz. The evening concluded with a live fireworks show produced by Fireworks America, which closely synced with patriotic music.
During event planning, parking and traffic were concerns.The decision to temporarily close Centennial Drive proved to be a good one. Enrique Ramirez (Engineering Technician) and the Streets Division developed a detailed entry and exit traffic plan that worked smoothly. In addition, the CERT Team and Ag Land Security managed both parking and traffic effectively. As with most large- scale events, this was a coordinated team effort by many City departments, including:
14.B.
Department Role
Public Works
Department
Utilities &
Engineering
Hanford Fire
Department
Hanford Police
Department
Recreation &
Comm. Srvs.
Department
Streets Division-traffic signage placement. Refuse -
temporary trash container delivery and pick-up
Creation of the traffic plan
CERT Team volunteers, on-site monitoring of the
fireworks launch area, and fire suppression
Overall public safety and traffic control
Planning, marketing, sponsorship solicitation, event
Set-up and tear down, vendor management, event staffing, and procurement of services.
Sponsorships and Marketing
The City is very appreciative of the sponsoring organizations and businesses, which include:
• 1776 Sons of Liberty
• Valley Strong Credit Union
• FAST Credit Union
• Bueno Beverage
• JH Tackett Marketing
• QK Engineering
• Hanford Online Charter School
Marketing included a variety of strategies, with a strong focus on social media. We also placed thirty mini-billboards in highly visible locations throughout the City. Upon analysis of the Placer,ai location analytics software, we found the visitor origin was predominantly local; however, we had 470 visitors travel from Visalia. The origin of visits is as follows:
Hanford 50.1%
Visalia 12.7%
Lemoore 8.9%
Corcoran 3%
Armona 1.8%
Tulare 1.7%
All Others 21.8%
Revenue and Expense
REVENUE
TICKETS $12,897.75
SPONSORSHIPS $8,500.00
VENDORS $4,152.70
KIDS ZONE $3,360.00
CONCESSIONS $2,662.00
MERCH $619.00
TOTAL REVENUE $32,191.45
EXPENSES
FIREWORKS $30,000.00
RENTALS* $8,923.74
ENTERTAINMENT $8,339.91
SIGNS & DECOR $7,520.37
PT STAFF $5,513.50
SECURITY $3,080.00
CONCESSIONS $2,110.11
MARKETING $1,086.55
MISCELLANEOUS** $5,089.40
TOTAL EXPENSES $71,663.58
PROFIT (LOSS) ($39,472.13)
COST RECOVERY 44.9%
* Rentals: Stage, sound, canopies, porta-potties, inflatables ** Misc: Insurance, merchandise, postcards, Square fees
Summary
Staff is seeking Council direction on future July 4th celebrations, as a long lead time is needed to secure a fireworks vendor and live entertainment. Event expenses are offset by revenues generated from, but not limited to, the sources identified in the table above, with the potential for additional revenue from illegal fireworks citations, reducing the burden on General Fund reserves. If the Council desires to continue this event on a recurring basis, staff will include the necessary funding considerations during future budget development for FY 2028 & 2029.
Many lessons were learned throughout the planning and execution of this event. These lessons will result in improved logistics and operations. One minor complaint we heard was that the fireworks were too low. In speaking with Fireworks America, the reason was the proximity of the fireworks launch site and minimal visual obstructions, which allowed a denser concentration of explosives that provided literally more bang for the buck. Prior to the event, there were also concerns about the planned closure of Centennial Drive, which proved to be unwarranted. The detailed parking and traffic plan ensured safe, efficient movement of vehicles with minimal delays.
For a first-time event, Freedom Fest went very well. The venue, planning, and coordination with many departments proved to be the recipe for success. Despite the competition from other celebrations, the marketing, social media, and placement of mini billboards attracted 3,701 people to the event. Coupled with the City's It’s not Worth It campaign, the live fireworks show may have contributed to a reduction of illegal fireworks throughout the City. Events such as Freedom Fest bring the community together, strengthen community pride, and enhance the quality of life for Hanford residents.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This is currently not a budgeted event for fiscal year 2027/2028 (July 2027) and if approved by Council, it would be funded by the General Fund. The projected event revenue of $33,500 will offset expenses, resulting in an overall impact on the General Fund of approximately $ 43,121. This could further be offset in whole or partially with illegal firework citations collected (net revenue after expenses paid for in It's Not Worth It program costs). With the potential revenues coming in from these areas and policy direction on the use of citation revenues by City Council, this event could be a "net zero" impact to the General Fund and help to maintain a balanced budget while promoting the
community.
There are other options at the City Council's discretion. A listing of options includes, but is not limited to:
- Defer 4th of July event to another year
- Defer 4th of July event to another organization to lead
ATTACHMENTS:
None
Council Future Agenda Items
Originated
Date Item Originator Staff Lead Date Estimate
11/4/2025 Artificial Intelligence Policy Discussion City Council Chris Tavarez Brian Johnson
TBD
11/18/2025 RFP for City Attorney Services City Council Chris Tavarez Mid 2027 6/16/2026 Discussion of potential social media
policy amendments regarding
monetization of the Council’s social
media platforms
City Council Chris Tavarez
Brian Johnson
TBD
7/21/2026 Overview of the Flock Safety Camera
Program
City Council Chief
Huddleston
9/2026
7/21/2026 Data Centers: City Zoning, Potential
Impacts, and Council Discussion
City Council Chris Tavarez
Jason Waters
8/18/2026