Agenda packet — Hanford City Council, August 18, 2026 (part 2 of 2)

Proposal – Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment BSK Proposal P26000605 Proposed Public Safety Facility June 8, 2026 (REVISED June 18, 2026) Hanford, California Page 2

Please note, due to the location of the following RECs identified in the Phase I ESA, BSK does not propose investigation activities at this time. However, during site development activities, BSK recommends additional investigation once these areas are accessible. If this approach is not acceptable, please notify us immediately.

A. the former blacksmith shop depicted in the 1905 Sanborn map, B. the battery service operation depicted in the 1925 Sanborn map, C. the waste paint solvent storage area on APN 012-045-007, D. the floor drain on APN 012-045-007, and
E. the storm drain on 012-045-006 that are noted in the Phase I ESA.

Additionally, BSK has included sampling of the wash rack area that was noted in the questionnaire dated March 17, 2026, however, BSK will need to be provided the location of this area to ascertain the possibility of investigation at this time.

If during future site development activities evidence of contamination is found, please contact BSK immediately for additional consultation.

BSK will perform the following tasks to evaluate the RECs and concerns on the Subject Property that are identified above. Please note that the intent of a Limited Phase II ESA is to follow up on concerns identified in a Phase I ESA. It is not the intent of a Limited Phase II ESA to identify the extent of contamination or ascertain cleanup costs for the contaminants (if prese nt). Said services may be provided following the proposed services (if contamination exists), following subsequent investigations and at an additional cost. Also, please note that the recommendations not part of the scope of this proposal are either general recommendations or statements for the Subject Propert y, related to offsite properties, or were not requested to be addressed by the client in this proposal. Please inform the signatories of this proposal if you want other RECs or potential environmental concerns addressed.

Page 99 of 193 ends

Proposal – Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment BSK Proposal P26000605 Proposed Public Safety Facility June 8, 2026 (REVISED June 18, 2026) Hanford, California Page 3

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 1 – Pre-Field Activities
Prior to any subsurface exploration or sampling on site, BSK will mark the site and contact Underground Services Alert North (USAN) who provides a partial location service free of charge for major utility lines.

It is important that the City understand that su bsurface structures (such as septic systems , private irrigation/telecommunication/utility lines, service laterals and leach fields) buried under private property will not be marked by the public utility companies contacted by USA N. Those utilities should be marked by the City prior to our field work. BSK cannot be responsible for damage to said unmarked utilities.

It is BSK’s understanding that Kings County will not require permitting for the proposed scope of services.

If permitting is required, additional time and materials will be required.

Prior to field activities, BSK will coordinate with the City of Hanford (City) for Site access and with BSK Analytical Laboratories to acquire the proper sampling containers for the required water /soil analyses, gather the appropriate field forms and equipment, and calibrate field meters.

Task 2 – Soil Sampling
BSK proposes the following soil sampling on the Site to evaluate the RECs on the S ubject Property that you desire to be evaluated and to the extent of accessible area. BSK’s proposed scope of services does not include coring and sampling through the floors of the existing structures on the Subject Property.

BSK assumes all sampling locations will be readily accessible and will not be covered by vehicles, equipment or debris. Soil samples will be collected using a drill rig, hand auger, shovel, or pre -cleaned plastic or stainless-steel scoop, or a combination therefrom. The selection of sampling device is dependent on-site conditions and will be documented in the field.

The soil samples would be collected and placed in laboratory prepared containers, labeled, and placed on ice in a cooler which will be secured. The samples and completed chain -of-custody forms would be transported to the selected analytical laboratory.

All hand auguring and sampling equipment w ould be cleaned using a high -pressure washer or a laboratory-grade (Alconox®, Liquinox® or equivalent) detergent wash and potable water rinse prior to, and between collection of each sample. Rinseate will be contained in 55 -gallon drums and analyzed for disposal purposes. D
During the excavations, soil will be field screened using a Photo Ionization Detector (PID) which measures ionizable compounds in air in parts per million by volume (ppmv).

Page 100 of 193 ends

Proposal – Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment BSK Proposal P26000605 Proposed Public Safety Facility June 8, 2026 (REVISED June 18, 2026) Hanford, California Page 4

Following completion of sampling activities, all borings w ould be closed in place using the auger returns supplemented with native soil and/or bentonite. Excess hand auger returns would contained in 55-gallon drums and analyzed for disposal purposes. Asphalt will be replaced with concrete with lamp black added at the surface.

All analyses would be conducted on a standard analytical turnaround time (TAT) requiring approximately 10-15 working days for laboratory services unless a special rush turnaround is requested at an additional charge.

TASK 2A – LIMITED SOIL SAMPLING – AUTO WRECKING YARD / AUTO TRUCK SERVICE & WELDING OPERATION / FORMER AUTO REPAIR FACILITY ON APN 012-045-006 AND 012-045-007 BSK proposes up to eleven (11) boring locations in the area of the former Auto Wrecking Yard / Auto Truck Service & Welding Operation / Former Auto Repair Facility that are outside of the existing buildings on APN 012-045-006 and 012-045-007. Borings will be advanced using a direct-push drill rig, hand auger, or equivalent. All soil samples would be obtained from a depth of 0-6” bgs or immediately below any baserock layer and 2-3’ bgs. Up to twenty-two (22) discrete soil samples will be collected from the eleven (11) boring locations.

Each soil sample collected would be chemically analyzed for the following:
• Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260
• TPH-Gasoline by EPA Method 8260;
• TPH-Diesel/Motor Oil with Silica Gel Treatment (SGT) by EPA Method 8015; • CAM-17 Metals with STLC/TCLP Decision by EPA Methods; If analytes subject to the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) per 40CFR§261.24, exceed 20- times the Maximum Concentration of Contaminants for the Toxicity Characteristic, those analytes will be subject to additional TCLP testing. Additionall y, if analytes subject to Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration (STLC) per 22CCR§66261.24 (Characteristic of Toxicity) exceed 10-times the STLC regulatory level then those analytes will be tested using a California Waste Extraction Test (WET) . If Concentrations of applicable analytes exceed the TTLC concentration presented in 22CCR§66261.24 (Table II; List of Inorganic Persistent and Bioaccumulative Toxic Substances or their Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration), then that soil would be considered a non-Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (non- RCRA) California hazardous waste, and if removed would need to be disposed of in a Class I Landfill. The fee for TCLP/STLC testing is included in this proposal for budgeting purposes but may not be required pending results of the chemical analysis. If TCLP/STLC testing is required, additional time and materials charges will be required.

Page 101 of 193 ends

Proposal – Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment BSK Proposal P26000605 Proposed Public Safety Facility June 8, 2026 (REVISED June 18, 2026) Hanford, California Page 5

TASK 2B – LIMITED SOIL SAMPLING – STAINED CONCRETE IN CHEMICAL STORAGE AREA ON APN 012 - 045-006
BSK proposes up to two (2) boring locations in the area of the stained concrete in the chemical storage area on APN 012-045-006. Borings will be advanced using a direct-push drill rig, hand auger, or equivalent.

All soil samples would be obtained from a depth of 0-6” bgs or immediately below any baserock layer and 2-3’ bgs. Up to four (4) discrete soil samples will be collected from the two (2) boring locations.

TASK 2C – LIMITED SOIL SAMPLING – AIR COMPRESSOR BLOW DOWN STAINING ON APN 012-045-007 BSK proposes up to two (2) boring locations in the area of the air compressors on APN 012 -045-006.

Borings will be advanced using a direct-push drill rig, hand auger, or equivalent. All soil samples would be obtained from a depth of 0-6” bgs or immediately below any baserock layer and 2-3’ bgs. Up to four (4) discrete soil samples will be collected from the two (2) boring locations.

Each soil sample collected would be chemically analyzed for the following:
• TPH-Diesel/Motor Oil with Silica Gel Treatment (SGT) by EPA Method 8015; • CAM-17 Metals with STLC/TCLP Decision by EPA Methods; • Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260
Additional TCLP and STLC testing may be required as described under Task 2A above.

TASK 2D – LIMITED SOIL SAMPLING – WASH RACK AREA
BSK proposes up to four (4) boring locations in the area of the wash rack. Please note, BSK will require the location of the wash rack area to determine if investigation activities can be performed . Borings will be advanced using a direct-push drill rig, hand auger, or equivalent. All soil samples would be obtained from a depth of 0 -6” bgs or immediately below any baserock layer and 2-3’ bgs. Up to eight (8) discrete soil samples will be collected from the four (4) boring locations.

Page 102 of 193 ends

Proposal – Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment BSK Proposal P26000605 Proposed Public Safety Facility June 8, 2026 (REVISED June 18, 2026) Hanford, California Page 6

Task 2E – Investigation Derived Waste Sampling and Analysis Soil generated during drilling activities will be placed in labeled 55 -gallon drums, sealed, and stored on the project site. Drilling equipment will be decontaminated between borings; decontamination rinseate will be contained and transferred to sealed 55 -gallon drums and also stored on site. All drums will be labeled with the date, boring number, type of waste (e.g., soil, water, etc.) and a contact person and phone number.

BSK will collect one (1) sample from each drum (soil or rinseate) and analyze for the following:
• Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260
• TPH-Gasoline by EPA Method 8260;
• TPH-Diesel/Motor Oil with Silica Gel Treatment (SGT) by EPA Method 8015; • CAM-17 Metals with STLC/TCLP Decision by EPA Methods; • Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8270
BSK assumes a total of three (3) drums of soil and three (3) drums of rinseate will be generated. If additional drums are required, additional time and materials will be required.

Additional testing of drummed soil and groundwater may be necessary for disposal profiling and acceptance, depending upon specific acceptance criteria of the selected disposal facility. BSK can provide a separate proposal for additional profiling and disposal of soil and decontamination rinseate generated during drilling at a later date. The Client will need to provide a secure location for storage until the IDW drums are disposed.

Task 3 – Reporting
Upon completion of Subject Property activities, a report will be prepared that will include the following:
1) Documentation of field activities
2) The results of chemical analysis
3) Site plan showing pertinent Site features

Page 103 of 193 ends

Proposal – Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment BSK Proposal P26000605 Proposed Public Safety Facility June 8, 2026 (REVISED June 18, 2026) Hanford, California Page 7

4) Data evaluation and presentation of findings
5) Recommendations concerning further action, if necessary.

All soil sampling results will be compared to the following:
• The State of California San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) , Commercial/Industrial Environmental Screening Levels ( ESLs) (2026, Rev. 4), and Construction Worker ESLs (2026, Rev. 4). These ESLs are risk -based guidelines for evaluating contaminants in soils for the different property uses.
• The Total Threshold Limit Concentration (TTLC) values, and the Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration (STLC) values in California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 22, §66261.24 “Characteristic of Toxicity” for classification of a California Hazardous Waste. The TTLC values are used to compare to the total concentrations of analytes to evaluate whether or not a waste is a California Hazardous Waste. If the total concentration of an analyte exceeds 10 -times the STLC regulated value, then analyses using the California Waste Extraction Test (WET) can be conducted to compare with the STLC regulated value to evaluate if the leachable concentration of the analyte would classify the waste as a California Hazardous Waste. • The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Potential (TCLP) values in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 40CFR§ 261.24 for classification of a RCRA Hazardous Waste. If the total concentration of an an alyte exceeds 20-times the TCLP regulated value, then analyses using a TCLP test can be conducted to compare with the TCLP regulated value to evaluate if the leachable concentration of the analyte would classify the waste as a RCRA Hazardous Waste.

SCHEDULE
BSK will complete the above scope of services within approximately 18 weeks following authorization and no delays with accessing the Subject Property, USA N notification, and receiving analytical results. In the event of significant variation from this schedule, the City will be advised of said variation as soon as it becomes obvious to BSK.

Page 104 of 193 ends

Proposal – Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment BSK Proposal P26000605 Proposed Public Safety Facility June 8, 2026 (REVISED June 18, 2026) Hanford, California Page 8

PROPOSED FEES
BSK proposes to perform the proposed scope of services for the following proposed fees.

Task 1 – Pre-Field Activities
Units Description Rate Cost
3 hrs. Senior Professional (HASP and project management) $276/hr. $828. 5 hrs. Staff Professional I (HASP and mark site for USAN) $155/hr. $775. 66 miles Mileage $1/mile $66.

SUBTOTAL $1,669.

Task 2 – Soil Sampling
4 hrs. Senior Professional (PM/QA) $276/hr. $1,104.
15 hrs. Staff Professional I (Prevailing Wage) $215/hr. $3,225. 6 hrs. Staff Professional I (Non-Prevailing Wage) $155/hr. $930. 2 days Environmental Hand Auger/Sampler $175/day $350.
2 days PID $166/day $332.
41 ea. Stainless Steel Sleeves w/ Caps and Teflon film $15/ea. $615. 1 ea. Drilling Subcontractor (Prevailing Wage) $7,111/ea. +15% markup
$8,178.
132 mi Mileage $1/mi $132.
44 ea. Sample Disposal $15/ea. $660.

SUBTOTAL $15,526.

Task 2 – Chemical Analysis
44 ea. Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260 $193/ea. $8,492. 40 ea. TPH-Gasoline by EPA Method 8260 $158/ea. $6,320. 44 ea. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon as Diesel and Motor Oil with Silica Gel Treatment (SGT) by EPA Method 8015
$137/ea. $6,028.
44 ea. CAM-17 Metals by EPA Methods $165/ea. $7,260.
18 ea. Semi Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method
8270
$303/ea. $5,454.
-- TCLP Testing (if required) $154/ea. Not Included.
-- STLC Testing (if required) $154/ea. Not Included.

SUBTOTAL $33,554.

Task 3 – Reporting
16 hr. Senior Professional $276/hr. $4,416.
38 hrs. Staff Professional I $155/hr. $5,890.

SUBTOTAL $10,306.

TOTAL $61,055.

Page 105 of 193 ends

Proposal – Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment BSK Proposal P26000605 Proposed Public Safety Facility June 8, 2026 (REVISED June 18, 2026) Hanford, California Page 9

PROPOSAL ASSUMPTIONS
1) The Client would provide BSK Associates with the legal right of entry to the Subject Property to conduct the Scope of Services.
2) The Client will notify BSK Associates prior to mobilization, of any restrictions, special site access restrictions requirements, or known potentially hazardous conditions at the site (e.g., hazardous materials or processes, specialized protective equipment requireme nts, unsound structural conditions, etc.).
3) The project is anticipated to be California Prevailing wage under a recent California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) ruling. The client will need to provide a DIR Project # for online payroll reporting prior to any fieldwork.
4) The site is readily accessible by truck.
5) Pricing is based on non-hazardous work conditions and field activities will be performed in Level “D” PPE.
6) All site visits/work can be performed during normal business hours (Monday through Friday, 7:00 a.m. to 3 p.m.
7) All chemical analysis would be on a standard analytical turnaround requiring 10-15 working days by the laboratory.
8) Due to sample hold times, sampling cannot be reasonably performed on a Friday or the day before any holiday.
9) It is BSK’s understanding that permits are not required for BSK’s services under this project. If permits are required, additional time and materials will be required. 10) The City of Hanford will be the “Generator” of all wastes. BSK Associates, its owners, employees, agents, etc. assume no responsibilities as the “Generator” of the wastes. 11) Reports and project meetings/conference calls are not included in our estimate except as specifically noted but can be provided on request on a “time and materials” basis. 12) Our quote applies to work commenced within 90 days of this proposal. After that time, we should review our proposal.

The fees presented in this proposal are based on prompt payment for services presented in our standard invoicing format. Additional charges will be applied for specializing invoicing if backup documentation is needed. These special services will be charged on a time and expenses basis. Late fees will be charged if payment is not received in accordance with the terms contained in our contract.

All added costs incurred as a result of suspected hazardous substances would be charged on a time and expense basis over and above the estimated fees for the site investigation in accordance with our current fee schedule.

Page 106 of 193 ends

Proposal – Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment BSK Proposal P26000605 Proposed Public Safety Facility June 8, 2026 (REVISED June 18, 2026) Hanford, California Page 10

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Prior to any subsurface exploration or sampling on the Subject Property, BSK will mark the Subject Property and contact Underground Services Alert North (USAN), who provides a partial location service free of charge for major utility lines. It is important that the City (Client) understand that subsurface structures (such as septic systems, private irrigation/telecommunication/utility lines, service laterals and leach fields) buried under private property will not be marked by the public utility companies contacted by USAN. Those utilities should be marked by the Client or property owner prior to our field work. BSK cannot be responsible for damage to said unmarked utilities. BSK’s fee is not adequate to compensate for both the performance of the services described herein and the assumption of risk of damage to utilities, structures, landscaping, and paving. Depending on weather and surface conditions, some damage to surface improvements may occur during our investigation. Heavy rutting could occur durin g wet conditions. We will exercise care to reduce this damage, but some is likely to occur. We have not included time or fees to repair this possible damage except for backfilling the bore holes with soil cuttings.

Our scope and fee assume that access to the Subject Property will be available at no cost or delay to us.

In addition, any known information regarding the presence of hazardous materials at the Subject Property should be made available to our office prior to the start of our field investigations.

WORK SAFETY
The safety of our employees and the District’s staff is of paramount concern to BSK. You will be notified if the location of our field work on your project represents a potential safety concern. Unsafe conditions for fieldwork will require a modification of our estimated scope of services and associated f ees. We will advise you of the additional costs necessary to mitigate these unanticipated conditions, if applicable.

GENERAL CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS
BSK’s services will be performed in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other professionals practicing in the same locale and under similar circumstances at the time the work is performed. No warranty, either express or implied, is included.

AUTHORIZATION
If our scope of services, fee, and anticipated schedule are acceptable, please sign the attached Task Order Addendum to Agreement for Environmental Consulting Services.

Page 107 of 193 ends

Proposal – Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment BSK Proposal P26000605 Proposed Public Safety Facility June 8, 2026 (REVISED June 18, 2026) Hanford, California Page 11

CLOSING
Thank you for the opportunity to submit this scope of services and estimate for your consideration. We look forward to working with you on this project. Please call Kevin Grove at (408) 761 -6703 if you have questions or require additional information or services.

Respectfully submitted,
BSK Associates

Kevin Grove Robert “Tony” Martin, PG
Managing Principal – Environmental Services Principal Geologist

Enclosures: Task Order Addendum to Agreement for Environmental Consulting Services

Page 108 of 193 ends

Environmental, Geotechnical, Construction Services, Analytical Testing - An Employee-Owned Company

TASK ORDER ADDENDUM TO AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES THIS ADDENDUM, effective as of this 18th day of June 20 26 , is by and between City of Hanford (“Client”) and,
BSK Associates, Inc. (“Consultant”).

THE PROJECT is generally described as:

Environmental Consulting Services
Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (NW Corner of Brown & E. 6th St.)

THIS AGREEMENT consists of the following documents which are incorporated herein by reference:
• THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE “AGREEMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES” (EFFECTIVE DATE:
1/23/2026); and
Additional Scope of Services (All work would be done for on a time and materials basis):

• The scope of services outlined in BSK’s REVISED Proposal (P26000605), dated June 18, 2026.

Company agrees to perform the Services set forth in this Agreement and in accordance with its terms, including all attachments incorporated herein by reference. This Agreement may not be modified or altered, except in writing as specifically described in this Agreement.

CLIENT: CONSULTANT:

Signature:

Print Name: Kevin Grove

Title: Managing Principal – Env. Services

Agency: BSK Associates

Date:

Page 109 of 193 ends

ADDENDUM TO AGREEMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES THIS ADDENDUM, effective as of this 12th day of August 20 26, is by and between City of Hanford
(“Client”) and, BSK Associates, Inc. (“Consultant”).

THE PROJECT is generally described as:

Environmental Consulting Services
Supplemental Soluble Analysis of soil samples from Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment at Kings County APNs 012 -045-006 & 012 -045-007 for an additional fee of $924 as detailed in BSK’s email dated July 28, 2026 to Mr. Nick Matoian, Esq. as a legal representative of the City of Hanford.

THIS ADDENDUM consists of the following documents which are incorporated herein by reference:
• EXISTING AGREEEMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES DATED JANUARY 23, 2026; AND • Supplemental Soluble Analysis of soil samples from Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment at Kings County APNs 012-045-006 & 012-045-007 for an additional fee of $924 as detailed in BSK’s email dated July 28, 2026 to Mr. Nick Matoian, Esq. as a legal representative of the City of Hanford.

CLIENT: CONSULTANT:

Signature:

Print Name: Kevin Grove

Title: Managing Principal – Env. Services

Agency: BSK Associates

Date:

Page 110 of 193 ends

CITY OF HANFORD CITY COUNCIL

STAFF REPORT
Tuesday, August 18, 2026

PROJECT: Historic Resources Permit 0025-26, a request to allow modifications to the front and rear entries of 213 W. Seventh Street, including the removal of existing wrought iron gates and fencing at both entries, the installation of a new door with sidelite, transom, and diamond mesh at the front entry, construction of a new 7-foot- high stucco wall and new roof to connect to existing brick wall in the rear, and the installation of one new 4-foot-wide steel door with a vision window at the rear exit. The property is designated as a noncontributing building within the Historic Overlay Zone.

LOCATION: The project is located at 213 W. Seventh St. (APN 012-055-006).

STAFF RECOMMENDATION

1. Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, adopt Resolution 26-56-R conditionally approving Historic Resources Permit 0025-26.

RECOMMENDED MOTION

1. I move to adopt Resolution 26-56-R conditionally approving Historic Resources Permit 0025-26.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The property is a noncontributing building located in the Historic District, shown in Figure 1 below – outlined in black.

Page 111 of 193 ends

Figure 1: Historic Overlay Zone

“Noncontributing building” means a structure within a historic district which, in its present condition, does not contribute to the sense of time and place of the immediate area and the district. "Noncontributing building" may include those buildings constructed after the time period featured in a historic district or buildings in which the historical characteristics have been irreparably modified. "Noncontributing building" may also include buildings which, while noncontributing at present, may become contributing through the application of appropriate design criteria.

In accordance with the Municipal Code Section 17.48, alterations to the exterior of a building located within the Historic Overlay Zone are required to be approved through a Historic Resources Permit, which must be approved by the City Council.

Section 17.48.040

No improvement or exterior architectural feature of any improvement shall be constructed or altered or enlarged which is located in the Historic Overlay District or identified as a historic site outside the District, unless a permit is issued pursuant to the terms of this chapter. The section shall not apply to any interior alteration which has no effect on the condition or appearance of any exterior architectural feature of an improvement. No structure listed on a State or National Register shall be moved or demolished, unless a permit is issued pursuant to the terms of this chapter.

Section 17.48.070

A. A historic resource permit shall be required for any alteration of the exterior features of a building within a designated historic district, or a designated historic building or site, or to

Page 112 of 193 ends

construct a new building or improvements upon property within a designated historic district except as otherwise provided in this Chapter 17.48, the City Council shall determine whether a historic resources permit shall be issued. A permit shall not be required for ordinary maintenance and repairs as defined in this section.

B. Permit Procedures. An application for a historic resource permit shall be made on a form prescribed by the Community Development Department and shall be accompanied by the fees established by resolution of the City Council. The application shall include the information required by Section 17.60.020 for site plan review, complete elevation drawings of the proposed alterations, samples of proposed colors and materials, color photographs of all sides of any existing improvement, building or structure on the site, and such other information as may be required by the Community Development Department.

If applicable, the application shall include the information required by Chapter 17.58 (permit for conditional uses) and Chapter 17.62 (planned unit development).

Applications for permits requiring City Council approval shall be placed on the next regular meeting of the City Council. The City Council may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the permit.

Building Description

According to historic records maintained by the Community Development Department, it is estimated the building was constructed after 1913, with an approximate construction year of 1930.

As shown in Figure 2, modifications to the exterior of the building have been minimal. In 1987 and 1988, three Historic Resource Permits were approved, 87-21, 88-12, and 88-18, all pertaining to new signage for the Chamber of Commerce and the Visitor Agency, respectively. There have been no Historic Resource Permits since then for any façade modifications at this location, common name “The Mall”.

Presently, the exterior of the building is painted an off-white with black wrought iron gates and fencing at both front and rear entrances. See Figures 3, 4, & 5.

Page 113 of 193 ends

Figure 2: Historic Photograph depicting 213 W. Seventh Street frontage

Figure 3: Current Streetview 213 W. Seventh Street

Page 114 of 193 ends

Figure 4: Current rear view 213 W. Seventh Street

Figure 5: Current dimensions of windows and door at front entry

Page 115 of 193 ends

Proposal

The applicant of 213 W. Seventh Street proposes modifications at the front and rear entrances, which include the removal of existing wrought iron gates and fencing at both entries, the installation of a new door with sidelite, transom, and diamond mesh at the front entry, and at the rear entry, the construction of a new 7-foot-high white stucco wall and new chocolate brown hi-rib metal roof to connect to existing brick, and the installation of one new chocolate brown, 4-foot- wide steel door with a vision window. The existing storefront windows are to remain unchanged.

The front door and sitelite are proposed to be glass, with brown or aluminum metal framing. The new rear wall is proposed to be flush with the existing brick walls. Interior modifications to include the construction of one new ADA-compliant restroom within the existing building. For proposed modifications, see Attachment 1.

Evaluation

17.48.150 Design criteria
B. Design Guidelines. The following design guidelines are to be used to formulate plans for the rehabilitation, preservation, and continued use of old buildings consistent with the intent of this chapter. The guidelines apply to buildings of all occupancy and construction types, sizes and materials and to all permanent and temporary construction on the exterior of historic buildings as well as new attached or adjacent construction.

9. Contemporary design for alterations and additions to existing buildings, structures or sites shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historical, architectural or cultural material and such design is compatible with the size, scale, color, materials and character of the property, neighborhood or environment.

Analysis: The proposed alterations to the building do not destroy significant historical, architectural or cultural material, and the design of the replacement doors are compatible with the existing doors in size and scale. In Figure 4, the rear door frame of 215 W. Seventh St., just west of the rear entrance of 213 W. Seventh St., is shown to be a chocolate brown-colored metal. The proposed brown metal framing, chocolate brown steel door, and chocolate brown hi-rib metal roofing would therefore be compatible with the color and materials found within the neighborhood.

The replacement of the front and rear doors, and the use of chocolate brown hi-rib metal roofing can be supported by staff.

C. Rehabilitation Standards. The provisions of this subsection are intended to provide reasonable design for the rehabilitation of historic buildings so that the basic historic and architectural presentation of the buildings is retained and enhanced.

1. Storefronts.
c. Where the original design cannot be determined or where financial considerations preclude full-scale rehabilitation of a store front which has already been altered, a design which is not a pure rehabilitation but which is in keeping

Page 116 of 193 ends

with the design of the rest of the building may be appropriate. The general proportions, materials, colors, rhythm of solids to voids, repetition of design elements, and directional expression (the effect of verticality or horizontality common to the street) should be followed in designing new store fronts. The use of materials not in existence when a store front was built should be discouraged in its rehabilitation.

Analysis: This proposal is in keeping with the design of the rest of the building. The general proportions, materials, colors, rhythm of solids to voids, repetition of design elements, and directional expression are preserved as a part of this proposal.

2. Windows and Doors.

c. The original proportions of wall openings should be retained. The blocking of any existing opening to accommodate standard sash and glass sizes, to hide ceilings lowered beneath the tops of existing windows, or for any other reason should not be allowed.

Analysis: This project proposes to retain the original proportions of wall openings at both front and rear entries with the proposed new front door with sidelite, transom, and diamond mesh at the front entry and the new 4-foot-wide steel door with a vision window at the rear exit to replace existing gated entry.

4. Roofs

a. Contemporary roofing materials shall be acceptable. Where roofs are visible, roofing materials should be dark. Flashings should be unobtrusive.

Analysis: The use of hi-rib metal roofing material shall be acceptable. The proposed color of the roofing material is chocolate brown, which is a dark color. The flashings proposed are flush with the existing brick wall, and are therefore unobtrusive.

E. General Building Standards. The standards set forth in this subsection should be applied to all alterations or new construction in the historic district.

1. Color.

a. Exterior colors should harmonize with other colors on the same building and on the streetscape. Exterior colors should complement the colors of neighboring buildings and should be selected to be mutually supportive and beneficial to the overall historic character of the streetscape.

Page 117 of 193 ends

b. Where wood or metal surfaces of windows, doors, porches and details, other than cornices, are to be painted, the following colors shall be used: During the early twentieth century, muted colors and earth colors were favored. They included gray, dark brown, dark green, blue gray, beige, brick red, and terra cotta. A slightly grayish-white paint, was frequently used for major surface areas and for details.

This grayish-white is an appropriate choice for window sash and frames and for other details. In some instances, black or dark gray may be appropriate for the fixed window or door frame. If the original color of a cornice cannot be determined, grayish-white, buff or sandstone color are preferred choices.

Analysis: The proposed exterior colors for frontage modifications include either brown or aluminum for the metal framing around the glass door, sidelite, and transom. Staff recommends the use of dark brown metal framing, as dark brown is a muted color favored in early twentieth century. A chocolate brown color is proposed for the new metal roof and new steel door with a vision window at the rear entrance. This color would harmonize with the color of the chocolate brown metal frame of the rear door to 215 W. Seventh St., which is within the same block as 213 W. Seventh St. The new 7-foot-high stucco wall is proposed to be painted white. Staff recommends the use of an off-white paint color for this wall, to closely match the existing surrounding brick walls. The existing brick walls are not proposed to be repainted as a part of this application.

Conclusion:

Since the proposal complies with the requirements of the Historic Resource Overlay District standard, as described above, staff recommends approval of the Historic Resource Permit as proposed.

FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL

In accordance with Section 17.48 of the Hanford Municipal Code, staff recommends conditional approval of Historic Resources Permit HRA0025-26, and that the conditional approval of the historic resources permit will allow private investment in the Downtown area, allow the increase of economic and financial benefits to the City and its property owners and inhabitants, and make the following findings:

1. That the proposed modifications to the façade will not impact the Historic Overlay Zone since the façade improvements will be consistent with the Historic Overlay Zone Design Guidelines for a noncontributing building built prior to 1935 in the Historic Overlay Zone District.

2. That the proposed project will provide a complementary setting and environment in the Historic District.

3. That the proposed project will promote and encourage continued private ownership and utilization of structures so that the objectives set forth in this section can be attained under this policy.

4. That the request will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Hanford.

Page 118 of 193 ends

RECOMMENDATION – CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

The City Council may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the permit.

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 26-56-R conditionally approving Historic Resources Permit No. 0025-26, with the following conditions:

1. That approval of this project does not exempt compliance with all applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance, Public Works Improvement Standards, fees, or other City Ordinances.

2. That the alterations to the site be completed in accordance with the proposed changes. Future changes may be approved by the Community Development Director or forwarded to the City Council for review.

3. That brown metal framing shall be favored over aluminum around the glass door, sidelite, and transom at the W. Seventh Street frontage entrance.

4. That the new 7-foot-high stucco wall in the rear shall be painted an off-white color, to closely match the existing brick walls.

5. The relocated existing downspout shall be inconspicuous.

6. Signage will be reviewed at the time of sign permit submittal. Signage shall meet size requirements as stated in Sections 17.48 and 17.56 of the Municipal Code. If required standards are not met, proposed signage shall be reviewed by City Council through a new historic resources permit.

Applicant:

Frank Rivera
2221 N 11th Ave
Hanford, CA 93230

Owner:

Dane Swango
24881 Alicia Parkway E-108
Laguna Hills, CA 92653

Page 119 of 193 ends

Attachment 1

Page 120 of 193 ends

/0 /1/2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /i255 /10 /11/12/6/13 /i255 /14 /0 /15 /i255/16/6/17 /8 /i255 /18 /8 /19 /i255 /17 /8 /3 /6 /6 /8 /i255 /3 /6 /17 /8 /3 /4 /4/12/i255/11 /20 /20 /21 /8 /21 /4 /10 /5 /4 /22 /i255 /11 /20 /20 /3 /6 /17 /17 /13 /i255 /i255 /14 /0 /15 /i255/16/6/17 /8 /i255 /18 /8 /19 /i255 /17 /8 /3 /3 /6 /8 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /i255 /19 /11 /10 /23 /4 /3 /20 /i255 /7 /11 /24 /i255 /25 /15 /14 /15 /26 /4/16/10/6 /3 /13 /i255 /i255 /11 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /i255 /19 /32 /33 /34 /35 /36 /37 /28 /i255 /38 /38 /7 /39 /17 /19 /6 /6 /8/7 /4 /10 /17 /40 /38 /8 /11 /10 /8 /17 /13 /20 /11 /8 /6 /13 /3 /6 /41 /39 /i255 /18 /42 /0 /42 /14 /43 /6 /38 /6 /41 /11 /8 /21 /4 /10 /17 /i255 /11 /10 /20 /i255 /20 /6 /8 /11 /21 /38 /17 /17 /7 /11 /38 /6 /13 /i255 /0 /44 /1 /45 /i255 /46 /i255 /0 /47 /42 /26 /45 /10 /6 /16
/1 /47 /i255 /17 /8 /6 /6 /38 /i255 /20 /4/4/3
/48 /45 /i255 /7 /19 /4 /7 /4 /38 /11 /8 /6 /i255 /22 /3 /4/16/10/45 /49 /16/44/i255 /8 /6/12/2/6 /3 /6 /20 /i255 /50 /38 /17 /39 /23 /21 /51 /6 /20 /i255/16/21/10 /20 /4 /16
/15 /i255 /42 /7 /4 /11 /8 /i255 /17 /8 /40 /7 /7/4/i255/48 /45/16/19/21 /8 /6 /45 /49 /i255/4/44 /38 /11 /8 /19 /i255 /11 /10 /20 /i255 /2 /11 /2 /6 /3 /i255/4/44 /0 /44/14 /45 /i255 /8 /19 /21 /7 /52 /i255 /2 /38 /53/16/4/4 /20 /19 /21 /42 /3 /21 /22 /i255/12/6/8 /11 /38
/3/4/4/23 /21 /10/50/48/i255 /45 /7 /19 /4 /7 /4 /38 /11 /8 /6 /i255 /22 /3/4/16 /10/45 /49 /i255 /i255 /14 /i255 /51 /i255 /i255 /23 /11/7 /21 /11 /i255 /22 /20 /39 /48 /45 /i255 /7 /19 /4 /7/4 /38 /11 /8 /6 /i255 /22 /3 /4/16/10/45 /49 /3 /6 /11 /3 /i255 /48 /17 /4 /40 /8 /19 /49
/23 /3 /4 /10 /8 /i255 /6/10 /8 /3 /53 /i255 /48 /17 /4 /40 /8 /19 /49 /10 /6 /16
/1 /47 /i255/16/21/20 /6 /i255 /50 /38 /11 /17 /17
/17 /8/4/3/6 /i255 /23 /3 /4 /10 /8 /i255 /20 /4/4/3
/16/44/i255 /17 /21 /20 /6 /i255 /38 /21 /8 /6 /i255 /11 /10 /20 /i255 /8 /3 /11 /10 /17/4/12 /11 /22 /4 /41 /6 /39 /i255/12/6/8 /11 /38 /i255 /23 /3 /11/12/6/i255 /17 /19 /11 /38 /38 /22 /6 /i255 /48 /45 /i255 /22 /3 /4/16/10/i255 /4 /3 /i255 /11 /38 /40/12/21/10 /40/12/45/49 /6 /51 /21 /17 /8 /21/10 /50
/17 /8/4/3/6 /i255 /23 /3 /4 /10 /8
/16/21/10 /20 /4/16/17
/14 /0 /18
/6 /51 /21 /17 /8 /21 /10 /50/10 /6 /16
/7 /4 /10 /8 /3 /11 /7 /8 /4 /3 /i255 /13 /i255 /20 /11 /41 /21 /20 /i255 /50 /11 /3 /7 /21 /11 /i255 /7 /4 /10 /17 /8 /3 /40 /7 /8 /21 /4 /10 /54 /0 /15 /14 /i255/16/39/i255 /3 /6 /6 /17 /6 /i255 /7 /8 /39 /41 /21 /17 /11 /38 /21 /11 /i255 /7 /11 /24 /i255 /25 /15 /14 /18 /18 /7 /6 /38 /38 /i255 /55 /i255 /54 /54 /25 /i255 /25 /26 /25 /42 /43 /15 /56 /1 /i255 /6/12/11/21 /38 /13 /34 /30 /37 /30 /31/57 /35 /30 /18 /1 /0 /25/58/28/59 /57 /37 /33 /32 /59 /30 /33 /39 /36 /60 /29 /6 /51 /21 /17 /8 /21 /10/50/i255
/12/11/17/4/10/3 /53 /i255 /6 /51 /8 /6 /3 /21/4/3/i255/16/11/38 /38 /3/4/4/23 /i255 /8 /4 /i255/16/11/38 /38 /i255 /6 /10 /20 /i255/16/11/38 /38 /i255/12/6/8 /11 /38 /23 /38 /11 /17 /19 /21 /10 /50 /i255 /7 /40 /8 /i255 /21 /10 /8 /4 /i255 /22 /3 /21 /7 /52 /i255 /0 /42 /0 /44 /1 /45 /20 /6 /6 /2 /i255 /8/4/i255/6 /51 /7 /6 /2 /8 /i255 /22 /6 /10 /8 /i255 /11 /10/50/38/6 /23 /38 /11 /17 /19 /21 /10 /50 /i255 /17 /6 /7 /40 /3 /6 /20 /i255/16/21/8 /19 /i255 /38 /6 /11 /20 /i255/16/6/20/50/6/i255 /11 /10 /20 /i255 /23 /21 /38 /38 /6 /20 /i255/16/44 /22 /40 /8 /53 /38 /i255 /7 /11 /40 /38 /52 /21 /10/50/39/i255 /45 /61 /45 /i255/12/6/8 /11 /38 /2 /6 /3 /i255/12/11/10 /40 /23 /39 /i255 /40 /10 /20 /6 /3 /i255 /23 /38 /11 /17 /19 /21 /10 /50 /39 /17 /21/12/21/38 /11 /3 /i255 /8/4/i255/3 /4/4/23/i255 /23 /38 /11 /17 /19 /21 /10 /50 /i255 /i255 /20 /6 /8 /11 /21 /38 /4 /10 /i255 /17 /19 /6 /6 /8 /i255 /10 /4 /39 /54
/14 /i255 /51 /i255 /56 /i255 /20 /39 /23 /39 /i255 /2 /3 /6 /17 /17 /39 /i255 /8 /3 /6 /11 /8 /39 /i255 /55 /14 /i255 /38 /6 /20/50/6/3 /17 /6 /7 /40 /3 /6 /20 /i255 /8 /4 /i255/12/11/17/4/10/3 /53 /i255/16/11/38 /38 /16/21/8 /19 /i255 /15 /44 /1 /45 /i255 /3 /10 /20 /39 /i255 /3 /4 /20 /i255/16/44/i255 /6 /8 /42 /19 /2 /i255 /6 /2/4/51/53 /58/i255/14 /1 /45 /i255/4/39/7 /39 /i255/12/21/10 /39 /i255 /56 /45 /i255 /6/12/22 /12/8/39 /i255 /11 /10 /50 /38 /6 /i255 /3 /4 /20 /17 /38 /21 /50 /19 /8 /38 /53
/14 /i255 /51 /i255 /43 /i255 /20 /39 /23 /39 /i255 /55 /14 /i255 /3 /11 /23 /8 /6 /3 /17 /i255/58/i255/14 /1 /45 /i255/4/39/7 /39 /16/44/i255 /2 /6 /6 /38 /i255 /11 /10 /20 /i255 /17 /8 /21 /7 /52 /i255 /45 /19 /6/11 /8 /i255 /3 /6 /17 /21 /17 /8 /11 /10 /8 /45 /i255/12/4/21 /17 /8 /40 /3 /6 /22 /11 /3 /3 /21 /6 /3 /i255 /4 /44 /i255 /0 /44 /14 /45 /i255 /8 /19 /21 /7 /52 /i255 /17/4/38/21 /20 /i255 /4 /3 /i255/4/17/22 /39 /i255 /2 /38 /53/16/4/4/20/i255 /3/4/4/23 /i255 /17 /19 /6 /11 /8 /19 /21 /10/50/i255/i255 /11 /10 /20 /i255 /19 /21 /50 /19 /i255 /3 /21 /22 /i255/12/6/8 /11 /38 /i255 /3/4/4/23 /21 /10 /50 /2 /6/3 /i255/12/11/10 /40 /23 /11 /7 /8 /40 /3 /6 /3 /i255 /21 /10 /17 /8 /11 /38 /38 /11 /8 /21 /4 /10 /3 /6 /62 /40 /21 /3 /6/12/6/10 /8 /17 /39
/1 /45 /i255 /51 /i255 /0 /26 /45 /i255 /20 /39 /23 /39 /i255 /55 /14 /i255 /19 /6 /11 /20 /6 /3 /1 /i255 /42 /0 /44 /14 /45/16/21/20 /6 /i255 /51 /i255 /1 /45 /i255 /19 /21 /50 /19 /i255 /7 /40 /3 /22 /i255/16/44/i255 /0 /14 /45 /i255 /16/21/20 /6 /i255 /51 /i255 /0 /14/45 /i255 /20 /2 /39 /i255 /7/4/10/7 /39 /23 /4 /4 /8 /21 /10/50/i255/22 /6 /38/4/16
/i255/i255/16/44/i255 /55 /i255 /1 /i255 /3 /6 /22 /11 /3 /4 /10 /6 /i255 /11 /8 /i255 /8/4/2/i255 /11 /10 /20 /i255 /22/4/8/8 /4/12/i255/4 /23 /23 /4 /4 /8 /21 /10/50/39/3 /6 /22 /11 /3 /i255 /17 /19 /11 /38 /38 /i255 /22 /6 /i255/12/21/10 /39 /15 /45 /i255 /23 /3 /4/12/i255/8 /4 /2 /i255 /11 /10 /20 /i255 /22 /4 /8 /8 /4/12/i255/4/23 /23 /4 /4 /8 /21 /10 /50
/63 /64/65/65/66/65/i255/68 /69 /70/i255/71 /64/72 /73/73/i255/73/65/71 /74/75/72/76/i255 /69/74 /i255 /64/65 /69/64/i255 /77/72/72/64/63 /64/65/65/66/65/i255/68 /69 /70/i255/71 /64/72 /73/73/i255/73/65/71 /74/75/72/76/i255 /69/74 /i255 /64/65 /69/64/i255 /77/72/72/64/63 /64/65/65/66/65/i255/68 /69 /70/i255/71 /64/72 /73/73/i255/73/65/71 /74/75/72/76/i255 /69/74 /i255 /64/65 /69/64/i255 /77/72/72/64/63 /64/65/65/66/65/i255/68 /69 /70/i255/71 /64/72 /73/73/i255/73/65/71 /74/75/72/76/i255 /69/74 /i255 /64/65 /69/64/i255 /77/72/72/64 /11
/48 /i255 /11 /2 /2 /3 /4 /51 /39 /i255 /8/4/i255/22/4/8/8/4/12/i255/4 /23 /i255 /22 /38 /4 /7 /52 /i255 /4 /2 /6 /10 /21 /10/50/49 /0 /14 /45
/14 /i255 /51 /i255 /1 /i255 /2 /39 /8 /39 /i255/12/40/20 /i255 /17 /21 /38 /38 /17 /6 /7 /40 /3 /6 /20 /i255/16/44/i255 /0 /44 /14 /45 /i255 /3 /10 /20 /39 /51 /i255 /0 /1 /45 /i255 /38/50/39/i255 /11 /10 /7 /19/4/3/i255 /22 /4 /38 /8 /17 /11 /10 /20 /i255 /14 /45 /i255 /17 /62 /39 /i255/16/11/17 /19 /6 /3 /17 /i255 /11 /10 /20 /i255 /10 /40 /8 /17 /39 /i255 /21 /10 /17 /8 /11 /38 /38 /43 /45 /i255/12/21/10 /i255 /23 /3/4/12/i255/6 /10 /20 /17 /i255 /11 /10 /20 /i255 /43 /47/4/39/7 /39 /i255/12/11/51 /39 /12/6/8 /11 /38 /i255/16/6/6 /2 /i255 /17 /7 /3 /6 /6 /20 /i255 /17 /19 /11 /38 /38 /i255 /22 /6 /i255 /14 /45 /12/21/10 /39 /i255 /8/4/i255/17 /21 /20 /6/16/11/38 /52 /39 /78 /79
/4 /2 /6 /10
/2 /4/16/20/6 /3 /i255 /7 /4 /11 /8 /6 /20 /i255 /20 /21 /11/12/4/10 /20 /12/6/17 /19 /i255 /11 /22 /4 /41 /6 /i255 /20 /4 /4 /3 /39 /41 /6 /3 /21 /23 /53 /i255/16/21/8 /19 /i255/4/16 /10/6 /3 /0 /14 /45
/14 /0 /15
/6 /10 /20 /i255/16/11/38 /38 /i255/12/6/8 /11 /38
/23 /38 /11 /17 /19 /21 /10 /50 /i255 /7 /40 /8 /i255 /21 /10 /8 /4 /22 /3 /21 /7 /52
/17 /21 /20 /6/16/11/38 /38 /i255/12/6/8 /11 /38
/23 /38 /11 /17 /19 /21 /10 /50 /i255 /7 /40 /8 /i255 /21 /10 /8 /4 /22 /3 /21 /7 /52
/6 /51 /21 /17 /8 /21 /10 /50
/7 /6 /21 /38 /21 /10 /50 /i255 /19 /6 /21 /50 /19 /8 /i255 /11 /8 /22 /3 /6 /6 /61 /6 /i255/16/11/53
/14 /i255 /51 /i255 /1 /i255 /20 /39 /23 /39 /i255 /55 /14 /i255 /17 /8 /40 /20 /17 /i255/58/i255/0 /43 /45 /i255/4/39/7 /39 /i255/16/44 /0 /44 /14 /45 /i255 /8 /19 /21 /7 /52 /i255 /2 /38 /53/16/4/4 /20 /i255 /17 /19 /6 /11 /8 /21 /10 /50 /i255/4/10 /22 /4 /8 /19 /i255 /17 /21 /20 /6 /17 /i255/4/23/i255/16/11/38 /38/16/44/i255 /41 /11 /2/4/3/i255 /22 /11 /3 /3 /21 /6 /3 /11 /10 /20 /i255 /18 /44 /56 /45 /i255 /8 /19 /21 /7/52 /i255 /17 /8 /40 /7 /7 /4 /39 /i255 /17 /6 /7 /40 /3 /6 /i255 /6 /10 /20 /17 /4 /23 /i255/16/11/38 /38 /i255 /8/4/i255/12/11/17 /4 /10 /3 /53 /i255/16/11/38 /38 /16/21/8 /19 /i255 /0 /44 /14 /45 /i255 /51 /i255 /18 /45 /i255 /i255 /17 /21/12/2/39 /i255 /17 /8 /3 /4 /10 /50 /i255 /42 /i255 /22/4/38/8 /i255 /14 /i255 /24 /16/44/i255 /14 /45 /i255/16/11/17 /19 /6 /3 /17 /i255 /11 /10 /20 /i255 /10 /40 /8 /17 /39 /i255/12/21/10 /i255/4 /23 /i255 /15 /39 /78 /79
/14 /i255 /51 /i255 /17/4/38/21 /20 /i255 /22 /38 /4 /7 /52 /21 /10/50/i255/22 /6 /8/16/6/6 /10 /i255 /3 /11 /23 /8 /6 /3 /17 /11 /10 /20 /i255 /19 /42 /0 /i255 /17 /21/12/2/39 /i255 /19 /40 /3 /3 /21 /7 /11 /10 /6 /i255 /8 /21 /6 /17 /i255 /11 /8 /i255 /6 /41 /6 /3 /53 /3 /11 /23 /8 /6 /3 /i255 /6 /51 /7 /6 /2 /8 /i255 /23 /4 /3 /i255 /6 /10 /20 /i255 /3 /11 /23 /8 /6 /3 /17 /i255/16/19/21 /7 /19 /17 /19 /11 /38 /38 /i255 /19 /11 /41 /6 /i255 /11 /15 /54 /i255 /23 /3 /11/12/21/10/50/i255/11 /10 /50 /38 /6 /17 /39 /14 /i255 /51 /i255 /1 /i255 /20 /39 /23 /39 /i255 /55 /14 /i255 /17/4/23/23 /21 /8 /i255 /23 /3 /11/12/21/10/50/i255/58/i255/14 /1 /45 /i255 /4 /39 /7 /39 /16/44/i255 /0 /44 /14 /45 /i255 /2 /38 /53/16/4/4 /20 /i255 /17 /19 /6 /11 /8 /21 /10 /50 /i255 /11 /10 /20 /i255 /18 /44 /56 /45 /8 /19 /21 /7 /52 /i255 /17/8 /40 /7 /7/4/i255/22 /6 /38 /4/16/39 /14 /i255 /51 /i255 /23 /11 /7 /21 /11
/0 /14 /47
/3/4/4/23 /i255 /11 /10 /20 /i255 /6 /51 /8 /6 /3 /21/4/3/i255/16/11/38 /38 /i255/4/23/i255 /6 /51 /21 /17 /8 /21 /10 /50 /12/11/17/4/10/3 /53 /i255 /3 /6 /17 /8 /i255 /3 /4 /4/12/39 /3 /6 /38 /4 /7 /11 /8 /6
/6 /51 /21 /17 /8 /21 /10/50/i255/20 /4/16/10/i255 /17 /2 /4 /40 /8 /11 /3 /4 /40 /10 /20 /i255 /10 /6/16/i255/3/4/4/23
/8/16/4/i255 /38 /11 /53 /6 /3 /17 /i255/4/23/i255 /0 /44 /14 /45 /8 /53 /2 /6 /i255 /45 /51 /45 /i255 /17 /19 /6 /6 /8 /3/4/7/52 /39 /17 /8 /11 /50/50/6/3 /i255 /11 /38 /38 /i255 /5 /4 /21 /10 /8 /17 /39 /80 /81 /82 /83 /i255 /85 /81 /86 /83 /87
/0 /44 /14 /45 /i255 /8 /53 /2 /6 /i255 /45 /51 /45 /i255 /50 /53 /2 /17 /40/12/i255/22/4/11/3 /20 /i255 /11 /2 /2 /38 /21 /6 /20 /16/21/8 /19 /i255 /8 /19 /6 /i255 /38/4/10/50/i255/20 /21/12/6/10 /17 /21/4/10/i255 /2 /6 /3 /2 /21 /10 /20 /21 /7 /40 /38 /11 /3 /8 /4 /i255 /3 /11 /23 /8 /6 /3 /17 /i255/16/21/8 /19 /i255 /6 /10 /20 /i255 /5/4/21/10 /8 /17 /i255 /17 /8 /11 /50/50/6/3 /6 /20 /39 /23 /11 /17/8 /6 /10 /i255/16/21/8 /19 /i255 /0 /42 /54 /44 /56 /45 /i255 /8 /53 /2 /6 /i255 /17 /i255 /20 /3 /53/16/11/38 /38 /i255 /17 /7 /3 /6/16/17 /17 /2 /11 /7 /6 /20 /i255 /0 /14 /45 /i255 /26 /39 /7 /39 /88 /81 /89 /83 /i255 /85 /81 /86 /83 /87
/14 /45 /i255 /8 /53 /2 /6 /i255 /17 /i255 /20 /3 /53/16/11/38 /38 /i255 /17 /7 /3 /6/16/17/i255 /17 /2 /11 /7 /6 /20 /i255 /0 /45 /i255/4/39/7 /39 /21 /10 /i255 /8 /19 /6 /i255 /23 /21 /6 /38 /20 /i255 /11 /10 /20 /i255 /56 /45 /i255 /4 /39 /7 /39 /i255 /4 /10 /i255 /8 /19 /6 /i255 /6 /20/50/6/17 /39 /i255 /23 /11 /7 /6 /38 /11 /53 /6 /3 /i255 /6 /10 /20 /i255 /5 /4 /21 /10 /8 /17 /i255 /17 /19 /11 /38 /38 /i255/10 /4 /8 /i255/4/7/7 /40 /3 /i255/4/10/i255 /8 /19 /6 /i255 /17 /11/12/6 /3 /11 /23 /8 /6 /3 /i255 /11 /17 /i255 /8 /19 /6 /i255 /22 /11 /17 /6 /i255 /38 /11 /53 /6 /3 /i255 /6 /10 /20 /i255 /5/4/21/10 /8 /17 /i255 /11 /10 /20 /i255 /6 /20 /50 /6 /i255 /5 /4 /21 /10 /8 /17 /i255 /17 /19 /11 /38 /38 /i255 /10 /4 /8 /i255 /4 /23 /23 /17 /6 /8 /i255 /14 /1 /45 /i255 /4 /39 /7 /39 /i255 /23 /3/4/12 /i255/8 /19 /6 /i255 /22 /11 /17 /6
/38 /11 /53 /6 /3 /i255 /5/4/21/10 /8 /17 /39 /i255 /23 /11 /7 /6 /i255 /38 /11 /53 /6 /3 /i255 /8 /4 /i255 /11 /38 /17 /4 /i255 /22 /6 /i255 /11 /8 /8 /11 /7 /19 /6 /20 /8 /4 /i255 /8 /19 /6 /i255 /22 /11 /17 /6 /i255 /38 /11 /53 /6 /3 /i255 /0 /42 /0 /44 /14 /45 /i255 /8 /53 /2 /6 /i255 /50 /i255 /20 /3 /53/16/11/38 /38 /i255 /17 /7 /3 /6/16/17 /56 /47 /i255/4/39/7 /39 /i255 /2 /38/11 /7 /6 /20 /i255 /43 /47 /i255 /23 /3 /4/12/i255/38 /11 /53 /6 /3 /i255 /6 /10 /20 /i255 /5 /4 /21 /10 /8 /17 /39 /i255 /23 /11 /7 /6 /i255 /38 /11 /53 /6 /3 /16/11/38 /38 /22/4/11/3 /20 /i255 /5 /4 /21 /10 /8 /17 /i255 /8/4/i255/22 /6 /i255 /8 /11 /2 /6 /20 /i255 /11 /10 /20 /i255 /7/4/41/6 /3 /6 /20 /i255/16/21/8 /19 /5 /4 /21 /10 /8 /i255 /7/4/12
/2/4 /40 /10 /20 /i255 /11 /10 /20 /i255 /8 /19 /6 /10 /i255 /2 /11 /21 /10 /8 /6 /20 /39 /14 /i255 /51 /i255 /i255/16/4/4/20/i255 /20 /3 /53/16/11/38 /38 /22 /11 /7 /52 /21 /10 /50
/90 /86 /91 /83 /i255 /92 /93 /94 /i255 /95 /87 /86/96/81/85 /85 /i255 /89 /83 /97 /85 /97 /98 /99 /i255 /81 /82 /82 /83/100/80/85 /86 /23 /21 /38 /38 /42 /21 /10 /i255 /17 /2 /11 /7 /6 /i255/16/21/8 /19 /0 /45 /i255 /51 /i255 /0 /45 /i255 /11 /10/50/38/6 /i255 /21 /3 /4 /10 /i255/16/44 /2 /11 /21 /10 /8 /6 /20 /i255 /20 /21 /11/12/4/10/20 /i255/12/6/17 /19 /17 /8 /6 /6 /38 /i255/16/6/38 /20 /6 /20 /i255 /8/4/i255/11 /10/50/38/6 /21 /3/4/10/39 /i255 /17 /6 /7 /40 /3 /6 /20 /i255 /8/4/i255/3 /11 /23 /8 /6 /3 /11 /10 /20 /i255/16/11/38 /38 /39
/56 /47 /42 /26 /45 /i255/16/11/38 /38
/3 /6 /38 /4 /7 /11 /8 /6
/6 /51 /21 /17 /8 /21 /10/50/i255/38 /21 /50 /19 /8 /i255 /11 /22 /4 /41 /6 /10 /6/16/i255/3 /4 /4 /23
/15 /45
/15 /45
/12/21/10 /39
/12/21/10 /39

Page 121 of 193 ends

RESOLUTION 26-56-R

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HANFORD APPROVING HISTORIC RESOURCES PERMIT HRA0025-26, A REQUEST TO ALLOW MODIFICATIONS TO THE FRONT AND REAR ENTRIES OF 213 W. SEVENTH STREET,

INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING WROUGHT IRON GATES AND FENCING AT

BOTH ENTRIES, THE INSTALLATION OF A NEW DOOR WITH SIDELITE, TRANSOM, AND DIAMOND MESH AT THE FRONT ENTRY, CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 7-FOOT-

HIGH STUCCO WALL AND NEW ROOF TO CONNECT TO EXISTING BRICK WALL IN THE REAR, AND THE INSTALLATION OF ONE NEW 4-FOOT-WIDE STEEL DOOR WITH A VISION WINDOW AT THE REAR EXIT. THE PROPERTY IS DESIGNATED AS A NONCONTRIBUTING BUILDING WITHIN THE HISTORIC OVERLAY ZONE.

At a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford duly called and held on August 18, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Civic Auditorium, it was moved by Council Member ____________, and seconded by Council Member ____________, and duly carried, that the following resolution be adopted:

WHEREAS, an application, filed by Frank Rivera for Historic Resources Permit HRA0025-26, as shown in Exhibit A, was presented to the City Council; and

WHEREAS, the proposed project is located at 213 W. Seventh St. (APN 012-055-006); and

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hanford, at a regular meeting on August 18, 2026, reviewed the request for Historic Resources Permit HRA0025-26; and

WHEREAS, Section 153 01 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines categorically exempts “Existing Facilities” from Environmental Review; and

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hanford reviewed the application for the Historic Resources Permit HRA0025-26 and found that the application is consistent with Section 17.48 of the Hanford Municipal Code, that the approval of the historic resources permit will allow private investment in the Downtown area, allow the increase of economic and financial benefits to the City and its property owners and inhabitants, and make the following findings:

2. That the proposed project will provide a complementary setting and environment in the Historic District.

3. That the proposed project will promote and encourage continued private ownership and utilization of structures so that the objectives set forth in this section can be attained under this policy.

4. That the request will not adversely affect the public health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Hanford.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hanford hereby approves Historic Resources Permit HRA0025-26, subject to the following conditions:

1. That approval of this project does not exempt compliance with all applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance, Public Works Improvement Standards, fees, or other City Ordinances.

Page 122 of 193 ends

3. That brown metal framing shall be favored over aluminum around the glass door, sidelite, and transom at the W. Seventh Street frontage entrance.

4. That the new 7- foot-high stucco wall in the rear shall be painted an off- white color, to closely match the existing brick walls.

5. The relocated existing downspout shall be inconspicuous.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Hanford hereby approves Historic Resources Permit HRA00 25-26. Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford duly called and held on August 18, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: _______________________________________________________________________ NOES: _______________________________________________________________________ ABSTAIN: ____________________________________________________________________ ABSENT: _____________________________________________________________________

APPROVED: __________________________
Mark Kairis
MAYOR of the City of Hanford
ATTEST:

NATALIE CORRAL

CITY CLERK

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF KINGS ) ss

CITY OF HANFORD )

I, NATALIE CORRAL, City Clerk of the City of Hanford, do hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford held on the 18th day of August, 2026.

Date: _________________

NATALIE CORRAL

CITY CLERK

Page 123 of 193 ends

Exhibit A
Plans

Page 124 of 193 ends

Page 125 of 193 ends

12.H.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 8/18/2026 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Waive the 2nd reading and adopt Ordinance 26-04, approving Amended Prezone 0013-24, a request to amend the previous prezoning scope, in order to coincide with the amended Annexation 165 boundary. The prezone will apply to the properties proposed to be annexed as R-M Medium-Density Residential (80.95 acres) and MX-N Neighborhood Mixed Use (5.45 acres), consistent with previously approved General Plan Amendment No. 0009-24. The project is located north of Grangeville Boulevard, east of 9 1/4 Avenue (APN 014-143-069, 014-143-078, and 014-143-022).

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council waive the second reading and adopt Ordinance 26-04 approving Amended Prezone 0013-24.

Recommended Motion: I move to waive the second reading and adopt Ordinance 26-04, approving Amended Prezone 0013-24.

BACKGROUND:

On August 4, 2026, the City Council held a public hearing for Amended Annexation 165 and Amended Prezone No. 0013-24. During the meeting, the City Council introduced the ordinance and waived the first reading of Ordinance No. 26-04, associated with Amended Prezone No. 0013-24 by a 4,0 vote (1 absent).

Amended Prezone No. 0013-24 is a request to amend the previous prezoning scope, in order to coincide with the amended annexation boundary. The prezone will apply to the properties proposed to be annexed as a R-M Medium-Density Residential (80.95 acres) and MX-N Neighborhood Mixed Use (5.45 acres), consistent with previously approved General Plan Amendment No. 0009-24.

Figure 1:

Project Location

Page 126 of 193 ends

Figure 2: Amended Prezone No. 0013-24
(R-M Medium Density Residential and MX-N Neighborhood Mixed Use)

Amended Prezone No. 0013-24
In accordance with HMC Section 17.86.030, before a zone change may be approved, all the following findings shall be made by the reviewing authority:

1. That the amendment is internally consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan and the Municipal Code.

Analysis: That Amended Prezone No. 0013-24 is internally consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan, including Medium-Density Residential Policies L34 – L37 and Neighborhood Mixed Use policies L60 – L64, and Annexation Policies L15 and L17. The development proposed in the annexation area, under Tentative Tract 945, conforms with the regulations pertaining to the R-M Medium-Density Residential zone district and MX-N Neighborhood Mixed Use zone district, except where expressly modified under Planned Unit Development No. 0037-24.

2. That the amendment would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of the community.

Analysis: That this application has been reviewed by County departments, utility companies, City Fire Department, City Building Department, and other involved departments. Any mitigation required for public health and safety were applied to the proposal and required in the mitigation monitoring and

Page 127 of 193 ends

reporting program for Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2025-73, for which a Notice of Determination was filed.

3. That the amendment would maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the City.

Analysis: That job-housing balance is achieved by increasing opportunities for people to work and live in close proximity. The ratio is expressed as the number of jobs divided by the number of housing units. The jobs-housing balance is a general tool for analyzing where people work, where they live, and how effectively they can travel between the two. In the planning area, the existing jobs-housing balance ratio in 2013-2014 was 1.17. It is estimated that the implementation of the General Plan would increase the jobs-housing balance by 0.45 to 1.62, which would make the planning area a job- rich area.

The project conforms to the General Plan, as amended through General Plan Amendment No. 0009- 24, which proposed the up-zoning of approximately 72.92 acres of Low-Density Residential to Medium-Density Residential and the addition of a 5.45-acre Neighborhood Mixed Use site. The site will increase both housing opportunity and commercial activity, thus maintaining an appropriate balance of land uses within the City.

4. That the anticipated land uses on the subject site would be compatible with existing and future surrounding uses.

Analysis: That the anticipated land uses on the subject site include one large-lot single family residence, small lot single-family residences, duplexes, low-rise apartments, and neighborhood commercial uses, as proposed under Tentative Tract 945. The anticipated land uses for the annexation area include medium-density residential and mixed-use development. The anticipated land uses are compatible with the surrounding land uses and planned land uses in the area, which include agricultural land, a future regional park, single-family and multi-family residential.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The adoption of the ordinance will not have a fiscal impact.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Ordinance 26-04 (Prezone)

Page 128 of 193 ends

CC Ordinance Prezone 0013-24, Page 1 of 3

ORDINANCE NO. 26-04

AMENDED PREZONE NO. 0013-24

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HANFORD PREZONING

CERTAIN PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF HANFORD FROM COUNTY ZONING AL-10 LIMITED AGRICULTURE TO A COMBINATION OF R-M MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (78.16 ACRES) AND MX-N NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE (5.45 ACRES),

CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN, AS AMENDED BY GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0009-24

The City Council of the City of Hanford does ordain as follows:

Section 1: The following described territory situated in the City of Hanford is hereby prezoned under the terms of Chapter 17.86 of the Hanford Municipal Code:

Amended Annexation 165 filed by N&M Tulare, LLC

FROM: County zoning of AL-10 Limited Agriculture

TO: City zoning R-M Medium-Density Residential (78.16 acres) and MX-N Neighborhood Mixed Use (5.45 acres), as shown in Exhibit A

On property described in Exhibit B, containing approximately 86.4 acres, as depicted in attached Exhibit C; and

Section 2: The Council does hereby find as a fact that this Ordinance has been recommended for passage by the Planning Commission of the City of Hanford after public hearing before the Planning Commission after notice required by Section 17.70.100 of the Hanford Municipal Code and Government Code Section 65854. The City Council certified Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 202 5-73 on January 20, 2026 for the project, in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act. The City Council hereby finds that the prezoning is required to achieve the objectives of the zoning regulations as set forth in Section 17.06.010 of the Hanford Municipal Code, and that this O rdinance has been introduced by the City Council after public hearing held on the 4
th day of August 2026 at 7:00 p.m. of said day after notice required under the provisions of Section 65856 of the Government Code.

Page 129 of 193 ends

CC Ordinance Prezone 0013-24, Page 2 of 3

Section 3: This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its passage, and shall be published once in the Hanford Sentinel within fifteen (15) days after its passage, and the zoning will apply to such property in the event of subsequent annexation to the City under the provisions of Section 65859 of the Government Code.

Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford duly called and held on the ____ day of ________, by the following roll call vote:

ATTEST:

Natalie Corral

APPROVED

_________________________
MAYOR of the City of Hanford

CITY CLERK

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF KINGS ) ss

CITY OF HANFORD )

I, NATALIE CORRAL, City Clerk of the City of Hanford, do hereby certify the foregoing ordinance was duly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford on the 4 th day of August,
2026 and it was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford held on the _______ day of ______________, 2026.

Dated: _____________________ _____________________________

Natalie Corral
City Clerk

Page 130 of 193 ends

CC Ordinance Prezone 0013-24, Page 3 of 3

Exhibit A
Prezone No. 0013-24

A request to prezone the properties as a R-M Medium-Density Residential (78.16 acres) and MX-N Neighborhood Mixed Use (5.45 acres), consistent with the General Plan, as amended by General Plan Amendment 0009-24

Page 131 of 193 ends

9 1/4 AVENUE
COURSE 13
ANNEXATION AREA86.40 ACRES
E1/4 CORSEC. 19-18/22
SE CORSEC. 19-18/22

LELAND WAY
EX. CITY LIMITS
S00°08'55"E 2649.14'
S89°46'01"E 687.64'
COURSE 15
COURSE 2COURSE 4COURSE 3COURSE 8COURSE 5
COURSE 9
COURSE 12
COURSE 10
COURSE 11
450.03'N00°08'33"W
R=1525.00'L=314.64'D=11°49'17"
R=1475.00'L=304.33'D=11°49'17"
N89°20'39"W 997.38'
N11°57'50"W 1304.65'
N00°08'33"W 129.84'
N84°44'20"W 74.76'N89°20'39"W 111.60'N84°20'18"W 68.76'COURSE 6R=30.00'L=46.71'D=89°12'06"COURSE 7N04°08'13"W 129.20' S89°51'27"W(R)
N78°02'10"E(R)
GRANGEVILLE BLVD.

COURSE 14S89°46'01"E 933.30'
N0°08'55"W 30.00'
CENTERSEC. 19-18/22S1/4 CORSEC. 19-18/22

PROPERTYLELAND WAY
ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF HANFORDANNEXATION NO. 2025 - __________ N
FERNWOOD DR.SUBJECT
HWY 43FARGO AVE

VICINITY MAP
400'0'SCALE: 1" = 400'200'
N
24186BBBM CITY OF HANFORD EXHIBIT B-1www.borumlandsurveying.com810 W. ACEQUIA ST.VISALIA, CA 93291 7-2-26CHECKED:DRAWN:DATE:PROJECT:
(SEE EXHIBIT B-2)
9 1/4 AVE.

Page 132 of 193 ends

Exhibit C
Geographic Description
City of Hanford
Annexation 2025-____
Annexation to the City of Hanford
That portion of the East Half of the Southeast quarter of Section 19, Township 18 South, Range 22 East, Mount Diablo Meridian in the County of Kings, State of California, described as follows:

Commencing at the Southeast quarter of said Section 19; Course 1: Thence North 00˚08'55" West, along the East line of said Southeast quarter, 30.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
Course 2: Thence N89°20’39”W along said North right of way line a distance of 997.38 feet, thence continuing along said North right of way the following courses; Course 3: Thence N84°44’20”W a distance of 74.76;
Course 4: Thence N89°20’39”W a distance of 110.60 feet; Course 5: Thence N84°20’18”W a distance of 68.76 feet to the termination of said North right of way line and the beginning of a tangent curve concave Northeasterly with a radius of 30 feet and a central angle of 89°12’06”;
Course 6: Thence northerly along said curve a distance of 46.71 feet; Course 7: Thence N04°08’13”W along the Easterly right of way of 9 ¼ Ave a distance of 129.20 feet thence continuing along said Easterly right of way the following courses; Course 8: Thence N00°08’33”W a distance of 450.03 feet to a tangent curve concave Westerly with a radius of 1525 feet and a central angle of 11°49’17”;
Course 9: Thence northerly along said curve a distance of 314.64 feet; Course 10: Thence N11°57’50”W a distance of 1304.65 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave easterly with a radius of 1475.00 feet and a central angle of 11°49’17”; Course 11: Thence northerly along said curve a distance of 304.33 feet; Course 12: Thence N00°08’33”W a distance of 129.84 feet to a point on the North line of the Southeast quarter of said Section 19 and the termination of said easterly right of way of 9 ¼ Ave.; Course 13: Thence S89°46’01”E along the North line of said Southeast quarter a distance of 687.64 feet to the centerline of 9 ¼ Ave.;

Page 133 of 193 ends

Course 14: Thence S89°46’01”E along the North line of said Southeast quarter a distance of 933.30 feet to the centerline of 9 ¼ Ave. also being the East line of said Southeast quarter;

Course 15: Thence South 00˚08'55" East along the East line of said Southeast quarter, 2649.14 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.

Containing 86.40 acres, more or less.

Page 134 of 193 ends

Parcel Map Check Report
Client: Prepared by:

Client Preparer
Client Company Your Company Name
Address 1 123 Main Street
Date: 7/2/2026 10:17:50 AM

Parcel Name: ANNEX
Description:

Process segment order counterclockwise: False
Enable mapcheck across chord: False
North:989.28' East:27,335.19'

Segment# 1: Line
Course: S0° 08' 55"E Length: 2,649.139'
North: -1,659.85' East: 27,342.07'

Segment# 2: Line
Course: N89° 20' 39"W Length: 997.379'
North: -1,648.44' East: 26,344.75'

Segment# 3: Line
Course: N84° 44' 20"W Length: 74.760'
North: -1,641.58' East: 26,270.31'

Segment# 4: Line
Course: N89° 20' 40"W Length: 111.598'
North: -1,640.30' East: 26,158.72'

Segment# 5: Line
Course: N84° 20' 16"W Length: 68.762'
North: -1,633.52' East: 26,090.29'

Segment# 6: Curve
Length: 46.706' Radius: 30.000'
Delta: 89°12'06" Tangent: 29.585'
Chord: 42.130' Course: N44° 44' 36"W

Page 135 of 193 ends

Course In: N0° 39' 21"E Course Out: S89° 51' 27"W
RP North: -1,603.52' East: 26,090.63'
End North: -1,603.60' East: 26,060.63'

Segment# 7: Line
Course: N4° 08' 13"W Length: 129.199'
North: -1,474.73' East: 26,051.31'

Segment# 8: Line
Course: N0° 08' 33"W Length: 450.030'
North: -1,024.70' East: 26,050.19'

Segment# 9: Curve
Length: 314.641' Radius: 1,525.000'
Delta: 11°49'17" Tangent: 157.881'
Chord: 314.084' Course: N6° 03' 11"W
Course In: S89° 51' 27"W Course Out: N78° 02' 10"E
RP North: -1,028.50' East: 24,525.20'
End North: -712.37' East: 26,017.07'

Segment# 10: Line
Course: N11° 57' 50"W Length: 1,304.651'
North: 563.94' East: 25,746.63'

Segment# 11: Curve
Length: 304.325' Radius: 1,475.000'
Delta: 11°49'17" Tangent: 152.705'
Chord: 303.786' Course: N6° 03' 11"W
Course In: N78° 02' 10"E Course Out: S89° 51' 27"W
RP North: 869.70' East: 27,189.59'
End North: 866.03' East: 25,714.59'

Segment# 12: Line
Course: N0° 08' 33"W Length: 129.840'
North: 995.87' East: 25,714.27'

Segment# 13: Line
Course: S89° 46' 01"E Length: 687.641'

Page 136 of 193 ends

North: 993.07' East: 26,401.90'

Segment# 14: Line
Course: S89° 46' 01"E Length: 933.302'
North: 989.28' East: 27,335.20'

Perimeter: 8,201.974' Area: 3,763,395.18Sq.Ft.

Error Closure: 0.00 Course: S72° 09' 37"E
Error North : -0.001 East: 0.002

Precision 1: 8,201,973,000.000

Page 137 of 193 ends

12.I.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 8/18/2026 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Authorization for staff to record the final subdivision map for Tract No. 881-3 Live Oak East (Hidden Oaks Unit No. 3), a 128-lot subdivision located at the southeast corner of Hume Avenue and 12th Avenue.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends Council's authorization for the recording of the final subdivision map for Tract No. 881-3 Live Oak East (Hidden Oaks Unit No. 3), comprising 128 single-family residential lots, located at the southeast corner of Hume Avenue and 12th Avenue.

RECOMMENDED MOTION:

I move to authorize the recordation of Tract No. 881-3 Live Oak East (Hidden Oaks Unit No. 3), comprising 128 single-family residential lots, located at the southeast corner of Hume Avenue and 12th Avenue.

SUMMARY:

The final map for Tract No. 881-3 Live Oak East (Hidden Oaks Unit No. 3) represents the final phase of the Tract 881 development. Tract No. 881-3 Live Oak East (Hidden Oaks Unit No. 3) will subdivide a 27.23-acre parcel into 128 lots. The subdivision will be accessible from Hume Avenue and serviced by interior public streets equipped with full improvements, including curbs, gutters, parkway landscaping, sidewalks, streetlights, and public utilities (sewer, storm drainage, electricity, and water).

The applicants, SJV Horizontal, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, and Presidio JJR Hidden Oaks II 130, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, have submitted and received approval of the following required items:

1. The executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement is approved and on file with the Utilities and Engineering Department.

2. A Performance Bond in the amount of $9,063,363.99, covering 100% of the cost of public improvements as outlined in the Subdivision Agreement has been received.

3. A Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $4,531,681.99, valued at 50% of the Performance Bond, covering laborer salaries and benefits, and materials for public improvements has been received.

Page 138 of 193 ends

4. The final subdivision map, reviewed and approved by city staff and the Acting City Surveyor and is ready for recordation.

Therefore, staff requests authorization to record the Final Map upon receipt of the applicant-executed mylars.

BACKGROUND:

The Tract No. 881-3 Live Oak East (Hidden Oaks Unit No. 3) subdivision is part of a larger planned development to provide residential housing and community amenities in the City. The final map has been thoroughly reviewed by City staff to ensure compliance with the Subdivision Ordinance and other applicable regulations. The Subdivision Improvement Agreement outlines the Developer’s obligations for constructing and maintaining public improvements. The Subdivision Improvement Agreement also stipulates that the Developer will enter into a separate Deferred Improvements Agreement (DIA), agreeable by both the Developer and the City, outlining the future improvements to 12th Avenue, including the underground piping the Peoples Ditch, associated with Tracts 881-3. The DIA, once completed, will come at a later date before City Council for approval. The DIA will provide additional details on the timing of the 12th Avenue Improvements, Peoples Ditch undergrounding and how these improvements will be correlated to future Live Oak East Development Phases. Final recordation of the map was dependent upon approval of a non-binding DIA memorandum, which has now been achieved. The City's Utilities and Engineering Department has verified that all required bonds and fees meet City standards, ensuring that the infrastructure will be built to specification and maintained appropriately.

On June 16, 2026, Council authorized the conditional approval for the recordation of the final map which was dependent upon final approval of the DIA memorandum. The DIA memorandum was not completed prior to the stipulated July 16, 2026 deadline therefore requiring a separate Council action to reauthorize recording of the map. The terms of the DIA memorandum have now been reached and accepted between the City and the Developer.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The project has undergone environmental review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed subdivision is consistent with the approved environmental documentation for the larger Live Oak development, and no additional environmental review is required for the recording of the final map.

PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION:

On June 16, 2026, Council conditionally approved Tract No. 881-3 Live Oak East Hidden Oaks Unit No. 3 for recordation.

On April 5, 2022, Council approved Tract No. 881-2 Live Oak East Sterling Oaks Unit No. 2 for recordation.

PRIOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:

On June 9, 2026, the tentative subdivision map revision for Tract No. 881 was approved.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Page 139 of 193 ends

The developer is responsible for all costs associated with constructing the subdivision’s public improvements, including park land and amenities. Right-of-way dedications and easements are provided at no cost to the City. All Development Impact Fees, will be assessed with each parcel’s building permit, along with outstanding plan check and inspection fees, ensuring no direct fiscal impact to the City’s budget.

Reimbursements for eligible items are governed by Hanford Municipal Code Title 13 and the City of Hanford’s 2019 Development Impact Fee Study. There are no reimbursable items for this phase of development.

This structure ensures fiscal neutrality for the City.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Aerial Map

2. Final Map-Draft

3. SIA & Bonds

Page 140 of 193 ends

Page 141 of 193 ends

Page 142 of 193 ends

Page 143 of 193 ends

Page 144 of 193 ends

Page 145 of 193 ends

Page 146 of 193 ends

Page 147 of 193 ends

Page 148 of 193 ends

Page 149 of 193 ends

Page 150 of 193 ends

Page 151 of 193 ends

Page 152 of 193 ends

Page 153 of 193 ends

Page 154 of 193 ends

Page 155 of 193 ends

Page 156 of 193 ends

Page 157 of 193 ends

Page 158 of 193 ends

Page 159 of 193 ends

Page 160 of 193 ends

Page 161 of 193 ends

Page 162 of 193 ends

Page 163 of 193 ends

Page 164 of 193 ends

Page 165 of 193 ends

Page 166 of 193 ends

Page 167 of 193 ends

Page 168 of 193 ends

Page 169 of 193 ends

Page 170 of 193 ends

Page 171 of 193 ends

Page 172 of 193 ends

Page 173 of 193 ends

Page 174 of 193 ends

Page 175 of 193 ends

Page 176 of 193 ends

Page 177 of 193 ends

Page 178 of 193 ends

Page 179 of 193 ends

12.J.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 8/18/2026 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Acceptance and authorization for staff to File the City of Hanford's Quarterly Investment Portfolio and Transactions Reports as of 06/30/26.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept and authorize staff to file the City of Hanford's Quarterly Investment Portfolio and Transactions Report as of 06/30/26.

RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move that the City Council accept and authorize staff to file the City of Hanford's Quarterly Investment Portfolio and Transactions Report as of 06/30/26.

BACKGROUND:

Quarterly Investment Report
The City has approximately $156.7 million in investments and cash, across all funds, as of 06/30/26.

Recent Activity
The City actively maintains a minimum balance of $3.5 million in its Wells Fargo cash accounts.

Meeder, the City’s portfolio manager, continues to reinvest proceeds as securities mature. During this period, $6 million was transferred from the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) to the US Bank custody account to invest in securities, as currently there is a significant amount in overnight funds.

Longer-term securities were selected to lock in higher interest rates as the Federal Reserve reduced rates in 2025. However, it is likely that there will be no additional rate cuts in 2026 based on current predictions. The portfolio is well positioned to achieve competitive yields while maintaining a balanced maturity structure, with investments ranging from overnight to five-year terms.

Current Investment Environment

The Federal Reserve last lowered interest rates by 0.25 percentage points at its December 2025 meeting. Since then, it has maintained the federal funds rate at the same level through its June 2026 meeting. The rate cuts in 2025 were implemented in response to signs of a slowing labor market and increasing economic uncertainty.

As of July 2026, the Federal Reserve has maintained the federal funds rate between 3.50% and

3.75%, citing inflation that remains above its 2% target while noting that the labor market has remained stable. Following the Federal Reserve’s July meeting, some policymakers now anticipate a possible interest-rate increase before the end of 2026 if inflation remains persistently high. However, the majority voted to keep rates unchanged for now.

Page 180 of 193 ends

The 10-year Treasury note yield closed the second quarter of 2026 at approximately 4.44%, increasing from 4.30% at the end of the first quarter and 4.18% at the end of 2025.

Future Actions
The City's portfolio will be actively managed and re-invested as securities mature. As idle cash is available, the City will deposit to the US Bank custody account to be invested by Meeder. A review of the investment pool interest rates will occur as LAIF tends to achieve higher yields during rate-cutting environments due to their investments in longer average maturity securities. Meeder provides Staff with in depth quarterly reviews and timely economic updates as available.

Summary
The primary purpose of the City’s cash is to provide residents of Hanford with services. In order to maximize the earnings potential on the City’s idle cash, the City utilizes Meeder to actively monitor the portfolio and purchase low-risk investments which will provide a higher return versus allowing the cash to be held in savings accounts earning little to no interest. Additionally, idle cash is also held with government pools, including the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) and CLASS. It is the policy of the City to invest public funds in a manner that will provide a high investment return with a high level of security (low risk) while meeting the daily cash flow demands of the entity and conforming to all state and local statutes governing the investment of public funds.

FISCAL IMPACT:

This item is informational. Investing the City's cash will generate continual interest earnings on the investment portfolio.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Balance Sheet by Position

2. Transaction Detail

3. Treasurer's Report

Page 181 of 193 ends

Report: Balance Sheet by Position
Account: City of Hanford (446861)
As of: 06/30/2026
Identifier Security Description Original Units Current Units Currency Asset Type Original Cost Yield at Cost Matures Book Value Market Va lue CCYUSD US DOLLAR 2,425.88 2,425.88 USD Receivable 2,425.88 0.00 06/30/2026 2,425.88 2,425.88 4496261892 Wells Fargo Commercial Checking 283,224.24 283,224. 24 USD Bank Deposits 283,224.24 0.00 --- 283,224.24 283,224.24 4496895186 Wells Fargo Bank 56,006.00 56,006.00 USD Ba nk Deposits 56,006.00 0.00 --- 56,006.00 56,006.00 7248MEED Columbia Bank 4,163,975.08 4, 163,975.08 USD Bank Deposits 4,163,975. 08 1.81 --- 4,163,97 5.08 4,163,975.08 CACLASS CALIFORNIA CLASS 73.80 73. 80 USD LGIP 73.80 3.72 --- 73.80 73.80 CALAIF California LAIF 27,683,391. 52 27,683,391.52 USD LGIP 27,683,391.52 3.81 --- 27, 683,391.52 27,683,391.52 31846V567 FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG;Z 277, 703.94 277,703.94 USD Money Market F unds 277,703.94 3.53 --- 277,703.94 277,703.94 4496895186A Wells Fargo Stagecoach Sweep 8,841, 513.62 8,841,513.62 USD Money Ma rket Funds 8,841,513.62 3.53 --- 8,841,513.62 8,841,513.62 91282CQG9 US TREASURY 3.875 03/31/31 1,500,000. 00 1,500,000.00 USD U.S. Treasuries 1,488, 808.59 4.04 03/31/2031 1, 488,808.59 1,478,906.25 91282CQD6 US TREASURY 3.500 02/28/31 2,000,000. 00 2,000,000.00 USD U.S. Treasuries 1,955, 859.38 4.00 02/28/2031 1, 955,859.38 1,941,250.00 91282CPW5 US TREASURY 3.750 01/31/31 2,000,000. 00 2,000,000.00 USD U.S. Treasuries 1,995, 312.50 3.80 01/31/2031 1, 995,312.50 1,962,343.76 91282CNN7 US TREASURY 3.875 07/31/30 2,000,000. 00 2,000,000.00 USD U.S. Treasuries 2,026, 562.50 3.58 07/31/2030 2, 026,562.50 1,976,406.26 91282CGQ8 US TREASURY 4.000 02/28/30 875, 000.00 875,000.00 USD U.S. Treasuries 877, 604.50 3.91 02/28/2030 877,604.50 869,736.33 91282CGJ4 US TREASURY 3.500 01/31/30 1,500,000. 00 1,500,000.00 USD U.S. Treasuries 1,469, 472.66 3.97 01/31/2030 1, 469,472.66 1,466,250.00 91282CGB1 US TREASURY 3.875 12/31/29 2,000,000. 00 2,000,000.00 USD U.S. Treasuries 1,976, 718.75 4.23 12/31/2029 1, 976,718.75 1,980,156.26 9128284V9 US TREASURY 2.875 08/15/28 1,500,000. 00 1,500,000.00 USD U.S. Treasuries 1,446, 093.75 3.85 08/15/2028 1, 446,093.75 1,460,976.57 91282CGC9 US TREASURY 3.875 12/31/27 1,500,000. 00 1,500,000.00 USD U.S. Treasuries 1,500, 878.91 3.86 12/31/2027 1, 500,878.91 1,493,671.88 91282CKR1 US TREASURY 4.500 05/15/27 1,500,000. 00 1,500,000.00 USD U.S. Treasuries 1,524, 726.56 3.86 05/15/2027 1, 524,726.56 1,505,039.07 91282CKJ9 US TREASURY 4.500 04/15/27 1,500,000. 00 1,500,000.00 USD U.S. Treasuries 1,523, 964.84 3.86 04/15/2027 1, 523,964.84 1,505,449.22 3130B9TX8 FHLBANKS 4.000 03/17/31 '27 2,360, 000.00 2,360,000.00 USD U.S. Ag encies 2,341,592.00 4.18 03/17/ 2031 2,341,592.00 2,301,637.20 3130AMJS2 FHLBANKS 1.900 11/26/30 '26 1, 000,000.00 1,000,000.00 USD U.S . Agencies 899,378.00 4.38 11/26/2030 899,378.00 897,300.00 880591FE7 TVA 3.875 08/01/30 2,000, 000.00 2,000,000.00 USD U.S. Ag encies 1,992,380.00 3.96 08/01/ 2030 1,992,380.00 1,973,220.00 3133ETBF3 FED FARM CR BNKS 4.000 04/01/30 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 USD U.S . Agencies 1,493,220.00 4.10 04/01/2030 1,493,220.00 1,486,875 .00 3130AV5P3 FHLBANKS 4.375 03/08/30 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 USD U.S. Agen cies 1,522,500.00 4.03 03/08/ 2030 1,522,500.00 1,506,885.00 3133EKS64 FED FARM CR BNKS 2.040 09/24/ 29 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 USD U .S. Agencies 910,670.00 4.11 09/24/2029 910,670.00 933,620.00 3133EMHZ8 FED FARM CR BNKS 1.125 06/01/29 '25 2,000,000.00 2,000,000. 00 USD U.S. Agencies 1,754,260.00 3.95 06/01/2029 1,754,260.00 1,820 ,120.00 3133EMYY2 FED FARM CR BNKS 1.600 05/11/29 '25 2,025,000.00 2,025,000. 00 USD U.S. Agencies 1,813,306.50 4.21 05/11/2029 1,813,306.50 1,872 ,801.00 3130AKGN0 FHLBANKS 1.020 11/30/28 '26 1,650,000. 00 1,650,000.00 USD U.S. Agen cies 1,469,077.50 3.80 11/30/ 2028 1,469,077.50 1,521,366.00 3133EL5U4 FED FARM CR BNKS 1.120 09/01/28 '25 500,000.00 500,000. 00 USD U.S. Agencies 447,030.00 3.97 09/01/2028 447,030.00 466,025.00 3130ANGH7 FHLBANKS 1.750 08/16/27 '26 1,000, 000.00 1,000,000.00 USD U.S. Agencies 938, 940.00 3.68 08/16/2027 938,940.00 978,980.00 3130AVBC5 FHLBANKS 4.500 03/12/27 500,000. 00 500,000.00 USD U.S. Agencies 502,795. 44 4.30 03/12/2027 502,795.44 501,450.00 3130APY33 FHLBANKS 1.900 12/14/26 1,000,000. 00 1,000,000.00 USD U.S. Agencies 931, 700.00 4.53 12/14/2026 931,700.00 990,170.00 3130AWTQ3 FHLBANKS 4.625 09/11/26 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 USD U.S. Agencies 1,009,590.00 4.14 09/ 11/2026 1,009,590.00 1,001,490.00 89235MRG8 TOYOTA FINL SVGS 4.000 04/10/28 245,000.00 245,000.00 USD Negotiable CD's 244,387.50 4.09 04/10/2028 244,387.50 244,629.88 61768ET78 MORGAN PVT BNK 4.350 03/13/28 250, 000.00 250,000.00 USD Negotiable CD's 250, 000.00 4.35 03/13/2028 250,000.00 248,113.08 90355GLP9 UBS USA 4.350 03/13/28 250,000. 00 250,000.00 USD Negotiable CD's 250, 000.00 4.35 03/13/2028 250,000.00 248,147.92 798186P22 SAN JOSE CALIF UNI SCH DIST 1.014 08/01/27 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 USD Negotiable CD's 1,097,064.00 4.42 08/01/2027 1,097,06 4.00 1,160,504.40 15118RW37 CELTIC BANK 3.900 05/20/27 249,000. 00 249,000.00 USD Negotiable CD's 248, 626.50 3.98 05/20/2027 248,626.50 248,658.87 747133CN4 PYRAMAX BANK 3.950 10/22/26 245,000. 00 245,000.00 USD Negotiable CD's 244, 755.00 4.02 10/22/2026 244,755.00 244,948.54 010878BH8 ALAMEDA CNTY CALIF 3.599 08/01/29 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 USD Municipal Bonds 1,469,655.00 4.05 08/01/2029 1,469,655.00 1,465 ,843.50

Page 1 of 3 ends

Page 182 of 193 ends

Identifier Security Description Original Units Current Units Currency Asset Type Original Cost Yield at Cost Matures Book Value Market Va lue 91412GXU4 UNIVERSITY CALIF REVS 3.909 05/ 15/29 145,000.00 145,000.00 USD Muni cipal Bonds 140,636.95 4.66 05/15/2029 140,636.95 143,120.95 977100HW9 WISCONSIN ST GEN FD ANNUAL 4.346 05/01/29 1,250,000.00 1,250,000.00 USD Municipal Bonds 1,257,062. 50 4.18 05/01/2029 1,257,062 .50 1,249,531.25 13063DMB1 CALIFORNIA STATE 3.050 04/01/29 1, 530,000.00 1,530,000.00 US D Municipal Bonds 1,466,290.80 4. 04 04/01/2029 1,466,290.80 1,479,9 75.12 76913CBD0 RIVERSIDE CNTY CALIF PENSIO 3.120 02/15/29 1,000,000.00 1,000, 000.00 USD Municipal Bonds 956, 970.00 4.40 02/15/2029 956,970.00 963,458.00 13063DC48 CALIFORNIA STATE 1.700 02/01/28 2, 000,000.00 2,000,000.00 US D Municipal Bonds 1,875,640.50 3. 94 02/01/2028 1,875,640.50 1,924,4 80.00 79765RP29 SAN FRANCISCO CALIF CITY & 3.100 11/01/27 '26 1,285, 000.00 1,285,000.00 USD Municipal B onds 1,253,273.35 4.20 11/01/2027 1,253 ,273.35 1,265,299.67 13034AL81 CALIFORNIA INFRASTRUCTURE 1. 235 10/01/27 1,000,000.00 1,000,000. 00 USD Municipal Bonds 909,700. 00 4.33 10/01/2027 909,700.00 96 4,144.00 79768HJN9 SAN FRANCISCO (CITY & COUNT 4.655 10/01/27 ' 2 2,520,000.00 2,520,000.00 US D Municipal Bonds 2,544,220.20 4.08 10/01/2027 2,544,220.20 2,530,143.00 899154AZ1 TULARE CNTY CALIF PENSION O 3.959 06/01/27 600,000.00 600,000.00 USD Municipal Bonds 592, 098.00 4.54 06/01/2027 592,098.00 597, 224.40 35802GAA8 FRESB 2026-SB127 A5F 4.39 02/25/2031 2,000,000.00 1,999,752.25 USD M BS 1,986,785.10 4.47 02/25/2031 1,986,785.10 1,983,203.82 3137HNNC8 FHMS K-549 A2 4.34 09/25/2030 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 USD M BS 1,015,316.00 3.93 09/25/ 2030 1,015,316.00 994,080.68 3137FX3Q9 FH-K117-A2 1,600,000.00 1, 600,000.00 USD MBS 1,419,124.99 3.94 08/25/2030 1,419,124.99 1,419,706.62 3137FTBM8 FH-K108-A2 500,000.00 500, 000.00 USD MBS 445,625.00 4.02 03/25/2030 445,625.00 452,288.59 3137HLJA1 FHMS K-540 A2 4.513 02/25/ 2030 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 US D MBS 999,972.00 4.44 02/25/ 2030 999,972.00 1,000,181.36 3140NXC50 FN BZ2791 640,000.00 640,000.00 USD MBS 640,754.69 4.45 01/01/2030 640,754.69 633,043.28 3137HJ5Y9 FHMS K-534 A2 4.7 11/25/2029 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 USD M BS 1,495,132.50 4.70 11/25/2029 1,495,132.50 1,508,203.46 3140NWHC2 FN BZ2026 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 USD MBS 1,488,750.00 4.29 10/01/2029 1,488,750.00 1,483,509.78 3132XGY34 FH WN2529 2,745,000.00 2,745, 000.00 USD MBS 2,745,000.00 4.55 12/ 01/2028 2,745,000.00 2,747,038.82 3140HRBM4 FN BL0043 2,000,000.00 1,731, 668.20 USD MBS 1,698,928.86 4.35 10/ 01/2028 1,698,928.86 1,700,956.56 3137FJEH8 FHMS K-081 A2 3.9 08/25/2028 2,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 USD M BS 2,486,816.41 3.99 08/25/2028 2,486,816.41 2,470,077.70 3140LCLV1 FN BS2139 1,000,000.00 960,818.54 USD MBS 859,181.95 4.16 07/01/2028 859,181.95 903,562.09 67066GAR5 NVIDIA 4.500 06/15/31 '31 1,500,000. 00 1,500,000.00 USD Corporate Bonds 1,498,545.00 4.52 06/15/ 2031 1,498,545.00 1,494,870.00 17291W2W0 CITI GLB MARKET 5.000 05/20/31 '27 MTN 1,950,000.00 1,950,000.00 US D Corporate Bonds 1,947,075.00 5.03 05/20/2031 1,947,075.00 1,949,688.00 06055JQJ1 BOFAML 4.350 02/10/31 '28 MTN 1, 000,000.00 1,000,000.00 USD Corpor ate Bonds 1,000,000.00 4.35 02/ 10/2031 1,000,000.00 987,380.0 0 30303MAB8 META PLATFORMS 4.200 11/15/30 '30 1 ,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 USD Cor porate Bonds 1,499,490.00 4.21 11/15/2030 1,499,490.00 1,476 ,285.00 58933YBQ7 MERCK & CO 4.150 09/15/30 '30 1, 500,000.00 1,500,000.00 USD Corpor ate Bonds 1,500,180.00 4.15 09/ 15/2030 1,500,180.00 1,482,285 .00 24422EYE3 JOHN DEERE CAP 4.550 06/05/30 MTN 1 ,750,000.00 1,750,000.00 USD Cor porate Bonds 1,745,590.00 4.61 06/05/2030 1,745,590.00 1,751 ,050.00 194162AT0 COLGATE 4.200 05/01/30 '30 1,750,000. 00 1,750,000.00 USD Corporate Bonds 1,753,675.00 4.15 05/01/ 2030 1,753,675.00 1,740,865.00 713448GB8 PEPSICO 4.600 02/07/30 '30 1,250,000. 00 1,250,000.00 USD Corporate Bonds 1,247,075.00 4.65 02/07/ 2030 1,247,075.00 1,260,037.50 713448EL8 PEPSICO 2.625 07/29/29 '29 1,500,000. 00 1,500,000.00 USD Corporate Bonds 1,390,560.00 4.26 07/29/ 2029 1,390,560.00 1,424,850.00 023135CG9 AMAZON.COM 3.450 04/13/29 '29 1,500, 000.00 1,500,000.00 USD Corporat e Bonds 1,446,375.00 4.30 04/ 13/2029 1,446,375.00 1,463,835 .00 69371RS80 PACCAR 4.600 01/31/29 MTN 1,500,000. 00 1,500,000.00 USD Corporate Bonds 1,510,230.00 4.43 01/31/ 2029 1,510,230.00 1,509,135.00 191216DJ6 COCA-COLA 1.500 03/05/28 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 USD Corporate Bonds 1,368,090.00 4.16 03/05/ 2028 1,368,090.00 1,435,365.00 166756AR7 CHEVRON USA 3.850 01/15/28 '27 1, 500,000.00 1,500,000.00 USD Corpor ate Bonds 1,481,790.00 4.23 01/ 15/2028 1,481,790.00 1,489,98 0.00 09711CAJ3 BOFA FINANCE 4.150 11/26/27 '26 MTN 2 ,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 USD Cor porate Bonds 2,000,000.00 4.15 11/26/2027 2,000,000.00 1,9 96,480.00 30303M8G0 META PLATFORMS 3.500 08/15/27 '27 1 ,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 USD Cor porate Bonds 1,465,755.00 4.31 08/15/2027 1,465,755.00 1,487 ,505.00 532457CP1 LILLY 4.150 08/14/27 '27 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 USD Corporate Bonds 1,503,225.00 4.07 08/14/ 2027 1,503,225.00 1,499,025.00 437076DB5 HOME DEPOT 4.875 06/25/27 '27 1,500, 000.00 1,500,000.00 USD Corporat e Bonds 1,520,715.00 4.35 06/ 25/2027 1,520,715.00 1,508,580 .00 69371RT22 PACCAR 5.000 05/13/27 MTN 906, 000.00 906,000.00 USD Corporate Bonds 924, 772.32 4.15 05/13/2027 924,772.32 912,314.82 89236TMY8 TOYOTA MOTOR CRD 4.600 01/08/27 MTN 950,000.00 950,000.00 USD Corporate Bonds 958,141.50 4. 06 01/08/2027 958,141.50 951,919.00 46625HRV4 JP MORGAN 2.950 10/01/26 '26 2,000, 000.00 2,000,000.00 USD Corporat e Bonds 1,945,840.00 4.33 10/ 01/2026 1,945,840.00 1,994,060. 00 06406FAE3 BONY MELLON 2.450 08/17/26 '26 MTN 2 ,183,000.00 2,183,000.00 USD Cor porate Bonds 2,095,898.30 4.52 08/17/2026 2,095,898.30 2,17 8,328.38 09659CPN2 BNP PARIBAS NY 02/22/27 760,000. 00 760,000.00 USD Commercial Paper 737, 852.33 4.02 02/22/2027 737,852.33 740,569.33 60710WPN8 MIZUHO BANK NY 02/22/27 1,025,000.00 1,025,000.00 USD Commercial Paper 995, 129.79 4.02 02/22/2027 995,129.79 998,794.17 8923A1ND9 TOYO CRD PUE RIC 01/13/27 1,125,000. 00 1,125,000.00 USD Commercial Paper 1,097, 450.00 3.90 01/13/2027 1, 097,450.00 1,101,725.00 63873KL54 NATIXIS NY 11/05/26 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 USD Commercial Paper 975, 133.33 3.83 11/05/2026 975,133.33 986,841.39 63873KG84 NATIXIS NY 07/08/26 2,500,000.00 2, 500,000.00 USD Commercial Paper 2,443,466. 68 3.93 07/08/2026 2,443, 466.68 2,498,133.33 92970QAK1 WFCIT-261-A 1,500,000.00 1, 500,000.00 USD Asset-Backed Securities 1, 499,789.70 4.08 04/15/2031 1, 499,789.70 1,487,959.88 161571HZ0 CHAIT-251A-A 1,875,000.00 1, 875,000.00 USD Asset-Backed Securities 1, 874,962.31 4.16 07/15/2030 1, 874,962.31 1,866,748.67

Page 2 of 3 ends

Page 183 of 193 ends

Identifier Security Description Original Units Current Units Currency Asset Type Original Cost Yield at Cost Matures Book Value Market Va lue 17305EHA6 CCCIT-25A1-A1 1,500,000.00 1, 500,000.00 USD Asset-Backed Securities 1, 499,593.05 4.31 06/21/2030 1, 499,593.05 1,497,212.72 02582JKP4 AXCMT-252-A 1,000,000. 00 1,000,000.00 USD Asset-Backed Securitie s 999,981.90 4.28 04/15/ 2030 999,981.90 998,475.29 16144BAD0 CAOT-241-A4 1,000,000.00 1, 000,000.00 USD Asset-Backed Securities 1, 012,539.06 4.65 10/25/2029 1, 012,539.06 1,008,684.73 89240JAD3 TART-25A-A3 1,000,000.00 1,000,000. 00 USD Asset-Backed Securities 999, 959.90 4.64 08/15/2029 999, 959.90 1,002,968.27 89238DAD0 TART-24A-A3 1,437,000.00 760,819.00 USD Asset-Backed Securities 764, 771.68 4.65 10/16/2028 764,771.68 762,999.24 437918AC9 HONDO-241-A3 1,750,000.00 864, 849.58 USD Asset-Backed Securities 874,748.05 4.79 08/15/2028 874,748.05 868,682.00 --- --- 161,183,314.08 159,314, 221.64 USD --- 156,780,924.16 4.01 --- 156,780,924.16 157,288,145.89 * Weighted by: Market Value
* Holdings Displayed by: Position

Page 3 of 3 ends

Page 184 of 193 ends

Report: GAAP Transaction Detail
Account: City of Hanford (446861)
Date: 04/01/2026 - 06/30/2026
* Does not Lock Down
Account Identifier Description Origi nal Units Current Units Currency Coupo n Rate Transaction Type Entry Da te Settle Date Post Date Final M aturity Broker/Dealer Price Principal Amount City of Hanford - Operating 8923A1ND9 Toyota Credit De Pu erto Rico, Inc 1,125,000.00 1,125,000.00 USD 0.000 Buy 05/22/2026 05/26/2026 05/ 26/2026 01/13/2027 PERSHING LLC 97.551 1,097,450.00 (1,097,450.00) City of Hanford - Operating 60710WPN8 Mizuho Bank, Ltd., Ne w York Branch 1,025,000.00 1,025,000.00 USD 0.000 Buy 05/28/2026 05/29/2026 05 /29/2026 02/22/2027 WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC 97.086 995,129.79 (995,129.79) City of Hanford - Operating 09659CPN2 BNP Paribas New Yo rk Branch 760,000.00 760,000.00 USD 0.000 Buy 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 02/ 22/2027 CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC. 97.086 737,852.33 (737,852.33) City of Hanford - Operating 79768HJN9 SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 1,020,000.00 1,020,000.00 USD 4.655 Buy 04/20/2026 04/21 /2026 04/21/2026 10/01/2027 PERSHING LLC 101.026 1,030,465.20 (1,033,103.03) City of Hanford - Operating 91282CGB1 UNITED STATES TREA SURY 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 USD 3.875 Buy 05/22/2026 05/26/2026 05/26/2026 12/3 1/2029 CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC. 98.836 1,976,718.75 (2,007,975.66) City of Hanford - Operating 3130AMJS2 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 USD 1.900 Buy 05/20/2026 05/21/2026 05/21/2026 11/ 26/2030 STIFEL, NICOLAUS & CO., INC. 89.938 899,378.00 (908,614.11) City of Hanford - Operating 35802GAA8 FRESB 2026-SB127 A5F 2 ,000,111.90 1,999,864.13 USD 4.390 Buy 06/17/2026 06/23/2026 06/23/2026 02/25/ 2031 STONEX FINANCIAL INC./BD RATES 99.352 1,986,896.26 (1,992,261.45) City of Hanford - Operating 35802GAA8 FRESB 2026-SB127 A5F 2 ,000,000.00 1,999,752.25 USD 4.390 Buy 06/17/2026 06/23/2026 06/23/2026 02/25/ 2031 STONEX FINANCIAL INC./BD RATES 99.352 1,986,785.10 (1,986,785.10) City of Hanford - Operating 92970QAK1 WFCIT 2026-1 A 1,500, 000.00 1,500,000.00 USD 4.080 Buy 04/21/2026 04/27/2026 04/27/2026 04/15/2031 WE LLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC 99.986 1,499,789.70 (1,499,789.70) City of Hanford - Operating 17291W2W0 CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARK ETS HOLDINGS INC 1,950,000.00 1,950,000.00 USD 5.000 Buy 05/19/2026 05/20/202 6 05/20/2026 05/20/2031 D. A. DAVIDSON & CO 99.850 1,947,075.00 (1,947,075.00) City of Hanford - Operating 67066GAR5 NVIDIA CORP 1,500,000. 00 1,500,000.00 USD 4.500 Buy 06/17/2026 06/18/2026 06/18/2026 06/15/2031 MORGA N STANLEY & CO. LLC 99.903 1,498,545.00 (1,498,545.00) City of Hanford - Operating CCYUSD US DOLLAR 0.00 0.00 USD 0.000 Cash Transfer 04/22/2026 04/22/2026 04/22/2026 06/30/2026 U nknown --- 0.00 2, 000,000.00 City of Hanford - Operating CCYUSD US DOLLAR 0.00 0.00 USD 0.000 Cash Transfer 05/18/2026 05/18/2026 05/18/2026 06/30/2026 U nknown --- 0.00 2, 000,000.00 City of Hanford - Operating CCYUSD US DOLLAR 0.00 0.00 USD 0.000 Cash Transfer 06/15/2026 06/15/2026 06/15/2026 06/30/2026 U nknown --- 0.00 2, 000,000.00 City of Hanford - Operating 3137BP4K2 FHMS K-IR1 A2 (2, 500,000.00) 0.00 USD 2.849 Maturity 03/25/2026 03/25/2026 04/20/2026 03/25/2026 Matu rity 100.000 0.00 0.00 City of Hanford - Operating 13607FEJ1 Canadian Imperial Ho ldings, Inc. (520,000.00) (520,000.00) USD 0.000 Maturity 05/18/2026 05/18/202 6 05/18/2026 05/18/2026 Maturity 100.000 (520,000.00) 520,000.00 City of Hanford - Operating 63873KFF9 Natixis, New York Br anch (1,200,000.00) (1,200,000.00) USD 0.000 Maturity 06/15/2026 06/15/2026 06/ 15/2026 06/15/2026 Maturity 100. 000 (1,200,000.00) 1,200,000.00 City of Hanford - Operating 912828V98 UNITED STATES TREASU RY (1,000,000.00) (1,000,000.00) USD 2.250 Sell 05/28/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/202 6 02/15/2027 WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC 98.879 (988,789.06) 995,190.99 City of Hanford - Operating 3130AL5A8 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS (750,000.00) (750,000.00) USD 0.900 Sell 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 05/29/2026 02 /26/2027 STONEX FINANCIAL INC./BD RATES 97.847 (733,852.50) 735,596.25 City of Hanford - Operating 037833ET3 APPLE INC (1,500,000. 00) (1,500,000.00) USD 4.000 Sell 04/20/2026 04/21/2026 04/21/2026 05/10/2028 MA RKETAXESS CORPORATION 100.318 (1,504,770.00) 1,531,603.33 City of Hanford - Operating 3133ENSF8 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP (1,500,000.00) (1,500,000.00) USD 2.870 Sell 04/23/2026 04/ 24/2026 04/24/2026 03/21/2029 PERSHING LLC 97.120 (1,456,800.00) 1,460,746.25 City of Hanford - Operating 35802GAA8 FRESB 2026-SB127 A5F ( 2,000,111.90) (1,999,864.13) USD 4.390 Sell 06/17/2026 06/23/2026 06/23/2026 0 2/25/2031 STONEX FINANCIAL INC./BD RATES 99.352 (1,986,896.26) 1,986,896.26 --- --- --- 4,910,000.01 7,409,752.25 USD 3.473 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 7,264,977.31 (1,274,548.09)

Page 185 of 193 ends

Report: City of Hanford Treasurer's Report
Account: City of Hanford (446861)
As of: 06/30/2026
Diversification / Security Sector Identifier % of Portfolio YTM @ Cost Days to Maturity Fa ce Amount / Shares Market Value Original Cos t Receivable CCYUSD 0.002% 0.00 0 2,425.88 2,425.88 2,425.88 LGIP --- 17.657% 3.81 1 27,683,465.32 27,683,465.32 27,683,465.32 Bank Deposits --- 2.872% 1.67 1 4, 503,205.32 4,503,205.32 4,503,205.32 Money Market Funds --- 5.817% 3.53 1 9,119,217.56 9,119,217.56 9,119,217.56 Commercial Paper --- 3.986% 3.93 123 6,410,000.00 6,326,063.22 6,249,032.13 Negotiable CD's --- 1.489% 4.28 433 2,439,000.00 2,395,002.68 2,334,833.00 Municipal Bonds --- 7.951% 4.14 720 12,830,000.00 12,583,219.88 12,465,547.30 Corporate Bonds --- 20.285% 4.35 903 32,239,000.00 31,993,837.70 31,803,022.12 U.S. Agencies --- 11.498% 4.08 1092 19,035,000.00 18,251,939.20 18,026,439.44 MBS --- 11.023% 4.30 1151 17,677,238.99 17,295,852.75 17,281,387.50 U.S. Treasuries --- 11.344% 3.90 1169 17,875,000.00 17,640,185.59 17,786,002.94 Asset-Backed Securities --- 6.076% 4.38 1213 9,500,668.57 9,493,730.78 9,526,345.65 --- --- 100.000% 4.01 712 159,314,221.64 157,288,145.89 156,780,924.16

Page 1 of 1 ends

Page 186 of 193 ends

13.A.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 8/18/2026 AGENDA SECTION: GENERAL BUSINESS

SUBJECT:

Land Use Regulations and City Authority for Data Center Facilities

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: Receive a presentation regarding the Land Use Regulations and City Authority for Data Center Facilities
BACKGROUND:

Data centers are facilities that house computer systems and related equipment used for data storage, processing, communications, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, and other digital services. These facilities can vary substantially in size and intensity, ranging from smaller edge computing facilities serving localized needs to large-scale data centers with significant energy, infrastructure, and operational demands.

The City’s General Plan and Zoning Ordinance do not currently contain a specific land-use classification for data centers or edge computing facilities. The Zoning Ordinance identifies the uses permitted or conditionally permitted within each zoning district. Because data centers are not presently identified as permitted or conditionally permitted uses, they are not currently allowed in any City zoning district.

Accordingly, a data center facility could not be approved under the City’s existing land-use regulations unless the City first amends its Zoning Ordinance to establish where the use may be located and the standards applicable to its development and operation. City staff has not received direction to prepare such an amendment and does not intend to initiate that process unless directed by the City Council.

City Authority and Land-Use Regulations

Subject to applicable state and federal law, the City Council has the authority to establish land-use policy through the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. This authority includes determining:
• Whether data centers should be allowed within the City; • The zoning districts in which data centers may be located; • Whether the use should be permitted by right or require discretionary approval; • The development and operational standards applicable to the use; and • The findings and approval criteria applicable to individual projects.

Page 187 of 193 ends

The City Council could choose to retain the existing regulations, under which data centers are not an allowed use, direct staff to add data centers as a land use category and definition and not permit in any zone district, or direct staff to evaluate potential amendments addressing these facilities.

Data Centers on State or Federal Property

Federal and state agencies are generally not subject to local zoning, land-use, and permitting requirements when using their property for governmental purposes, unless applicable law provides otherwise. Accordingly, a data center proposed on federal or state property may not require City zoning approval, Site Plan Review, or building permits, even if the same facility would require those approvals on private property.

In those circumstances, the City’s role would generally be advisory rather than regulatory. The City could participate in applicable environmental-review processes, including CEQA or the National Environmental Policy Act, submit comments regarding potential impacts, and request appropriate mitigation. The City could also identify potential effects on fire protection, emergency response, traffic, utilities, infrastructure, noise/vibration, biological resources and surrounding land uses; coordinate with the responsible state or federal agency; and negotiate any agreements necessary for the provision of City services or connection to City infrastructure.

These exemptions may not apply when a proposed data center does not serve a governmental purpose and instead constitutes a private, commercial, or proprietary activity. Under those circumstances, the City may have authority to review the facility, and the project could be subject to applicable City zoning, land-use, site-plan, building, fire, and environmental-review requirements.

Whether City review is required would depend on the specific facts of the proposal, including property ownership, the entity developing and operating the facility, the nature of the proposed activity, and its relationship to the governmental agency’s authorized functions.

Environmental Review

CEQA requires a lead public agency to identify and evaluate the potentially significant environmental effects of a proposed discretionary action, consider feasible mitigation measures, and evaluate alternatives when required. If a specific data center project requires discretionary City approval, additional project-level environmental review may be required. A project on State-owned property that is subject to discretionary approval by a State agency would undergo CEQA review. The City could review the environmental document and provide comments regarding the project’s potential environmental impacts.

Potential environmental topics associated with data center facilities may include:
• Energy consumption and electrical infrastructure;
• Water demand and cooling systems;
• Fire flow, fire protection, and emergency response;
• Backup generators, batteries, fuel storage, and hazardous materials; • Air quality and greenhouse gas emissions;
• Noise and vibration;
• Traffic, circulation, and construction activity;
• Aesthetics, lighting, and compatibility with surrounding uses;

Page 188 of 193 ends

• Utilities, drainage, and wastewater;
• Biological resources; and
• Environmental justice considerations.

Purpose of the Council Discussion

The purpose of this item is to provide the City Council and the public with an overview of data center facilities and explain the City’s existing land-use regulations and regulatory authority.

No data center project, land-use entitlement, General Plan amendment, or Zoning Ordinance amendment is before the City Council for approval as part of this item. To date, the City has not received a formal application for entitlement of a data center or edge computing facility.

The City Council may receive the presentation without providing additional policy direction. In that case, the City’s existing regulations would remain unchanged, and data centers would continue to be prohibited because they are not identified as permitted or conditionally permitted uses in any City zoning district.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no direct fiscal impact associated with receiving the presentation and providing direction to staff. If the City Council directs staff to prepare amendments or conduct additional analysis, the City may incur additional staff, consultant, environmental review, or legal costs.

ATTACHMENTS:

None

Page 189 of 193 ends

13.B.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 8/18/2026 AGENDA SECTION: GENERAL BUSINESS

SUBJECT:

Review of the City of Hanford Landscape and Lighting District maintenance practices.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: That Council receive this overview of the current landscape maintenance practices and provide direction to staff on the desired options as presented.

Recommended Motion: I move to accept the report and continue with contractual services for the Citywide landscape maintenance of all Landscape Assessment Districts and Community Facilities Districts.

Alternate Motion: I move to accept the report and direct staff to explore further the use of in-house employees for the Citywide landscape maintenance of all Landscape Assessment Districts and Community Facilities Districts, and, if reduced costs or cost offsets are identified, bring them back to City Council for further consideration.

BACKGROUND:

In 1990, developers began using the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 to create maintenance districts to finance maintenance of decorative block fencing and landscaping improvements located along arterial and collector streets adjacent to subdivisions. Since 1990, 44 landscape and lighting assessment districts and 3 Community Facilities Districts have been created encompassing 64 acres of landscape. Seventeen (17) of these districts were built before 2000 and do not have a Consumer Price Index (CPI) provision to increase revenue.

With costs for utilities and maintenance increasing over the years, staff have been forced to reduce the levels of service, to balance expenditures and revenues. Six (6) of these districts have had maintenance eliminated to reduce costs and have deficient reserve funds balanced. This has become highly visible, with trees and shrubs in need of pruning, turf mowed monthly (by City staff) and a sparse landscape void of plant material and bark/mulch.

During the January 20, 2026, Council Study Session staff requested direction from Council on the process the landscape maintenance contract was being administered for the landscape and lighting assessment districts. Staff proposed as option 2, the landscape maintenance contract be advertised as a Request for Bids (RFB). An RFB works for straightforward projects with clear specs, focusing on the lowest price from qualified vendors. For the RFB, staff developed a very detailed scope of services, with maintenance standards, and expectations for the winning bidder. Staff also proposed as option 3, the creation of a new Public Works Division. Landscape maintenance would be performed by City staff. This division would be responsible for the maintenance and management of the Landscape Assessment Districts and Community Facilities Districts.

At the completion of the Study Session, Council provided direction to staff for the completion of option 2 to receive a more realistic cost for the contractual maintenance based on today’s rates, and to complete a cost analysis using those rates versus in-house staffing to perform the landscape maintenance. Staff completed the RFB process for the landscape maintenance services and received bids from four (4) different landscape maintenance contractors.

The bids received were higher than the previous maintenance contract costs. Staff had anticipated an increase in

Page 190 of 193 ends

maintenance costs because of current fuel prices and changes in labor and material costs since the previous Request for Proposals (RFP) was awarded. With the RFBs completed, staff awarded the RFBs to keep the landscape districts maintained while the cost analysis could be finalized.

After reviewing the RFB costs, staff found that the contractual costs had increased to the level that in-house staff could be hired to perform the landscape maintenance at a more comparable cost to those contractual services.

Unfortunately, the in-house costs remain higher than contractual services as shown in the table below. Some of the key factors that push the in-house staff higher are labor costs with employee weighted salaries, equipment maintenance and long-term replacement, and startup costs (vehicle/power tool purchase).

Staff believe there are still benefits to in-house staff that should be considered, even with the increased cost. Some of these are staff members onsite daily. They would be available to respond to issues that may arise throughout the week. In-house staff would also be able to respond quickly to irrigation, tree, and safety hazards. There would also be several hurdles that would need to be accomplished for the in-house staffing. Some of these would be initial startup costs, staffing will take time to recruit, hire, and train, equipment procurement, vehicles, lawnmowers, and power tools will take time to purchase. The City would also have to decide how to address the equipment costs.

Staff completed an initial cost estimate of $220,364 for the purchase of the equipment necessary to complete maintenance and an equipment replacement cost of $25,432 annually. These costs are included (Exhibit “A”) in the annual cost comparison and would push the in-house staffing even higher than contractual services.

Other factors that will need to be considered when comparing in-house staff with contractual services are future growth of the landscape maintenance districts. As new districts are developed in the City, additional staff and equipment will need to be added. The current analysis included existing maintenance areas and the current development under construction at the Stonehaven and Lunaria CFDs. Though future CFD development could help mitigate in-house staffing shortfalls by including all the associated costs in the CFD budget, an acreage per staff policy would need to be established to direct how and when these additional staff members would be added.

Based on the cost analysis, contractual services remain a less costly option, with in-house staff providing more flexibility to offer a more responsive maintenance option. All these factors should be considered, along with the financial state of the existing landscape districts, while making the decision on how to move forward with the Citywide maintenance of all landscape maintenance districts.

FISCAL IMPACT:

If the City chooses to perform services in-house, additional costs of $873,257 as shown in Exhibit "A" would be allocated amongst the LAD’s and CFD’s over the 5 years.

Exhibit "A" — Comparison of in-house service costs (includes start up costs and initial equipment purchases and annual equipment replacement reserves) vs. outsourced service costs

Page 191 of 193 ends

ATTACHMENTS:

None

Page 192 of 193 ends

Council Future Agenda Items
Originated
Date Item Originator Staff Lead Date Estimate
11/4/2025 Artificial Intelligence Policy Discussion City Council Chris Tavarez Brian Johnson
Sept 2026
11/18/2025 RFP for City Attorney Services City Council Chris Tavarez Mid 2027 6/16/2026 Discussion of potential social media
policy amendments regarding
monetization of the Council’s social
media platforms
City Council Chris Tavarez
Ty Mizote
Oct 2026
7/21/2026 Mural Ordinance Review City Council Jason Waters Oct 2026 7/21/2026 Overview of the Flock Safety Camera
Program
City Council Chief
Huddleston
Sept 2026

Page 193 of 193 ends

Hanford City CouncilAugust 18, 2026

Hanford City Council
August 18, 2026