Hanford City Council
September 15, 2026

City Council Meeting
Agenda

AMENDED
September 15, 2026
7:00 PM – Regular Meeting
Council Chambers
400 N. Douty St.

Council Members will meet in-person in the Council Chambers. Members of the Public may participate either in-person in the Council Chambers or remotely through the City’s Public Input Platform. Any member of the public may address the City Council on matters within the Council’s jurisdiction during the applicable public comment periods. Comments are limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes per speaker.

Speakers participating in person will be recognized first. Remote speakers will be recognized in the order they complete the registration process through the Public Input platform.

To participate remotely, review the instructions and register at:
https://publiccomment.hanfordca.gov/

To watch the meeting live (view only), visit:
http://livestream.hanford.city/

Members of the public may also submit written comments through the Public Input platform.

All written comments received before the close of the meeting will be included in the record.

4:00 PM CALL TO ORDER STUDY SESSION AND CLOSED SESSION:

ROLL CALL BY THE CITY CLERK:

PUBLIC COMMENT:

Study Sessions are considered Special Meetings under the Brown Act. Accordingly, comments from the public are limited to items listed on the agenda (GC 54954.3a). Public Comment will be accepted during each agenda item. A maximum of three minutes is allowed for each speaker. Please begin your comments by stating your name and providing your city of residence.

STUDY SESSION AND ACTION ITEMS:

A. Receive a presentation from the Mid-Kings River Groundwater Sustainability Agency and consider a motion supporting the proposed land-based assessment and groundwater extraction fee to retain local control.

B. Flock Safety Overview
CLOSED SESSION FOR DISCUSSION OF THE FOLLOWING:

A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (GC 54956.9)(d)(1))

City of Hanford v. Puga, et al.

Kings County Superior Court Case No. 26CU0342
B. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (GC 54957)

Title: City Manager
CALL TO ORDER REGULAR SESSION:

ROLL CALL:

INVOCATION:

Sylvia Gaston
FLAG SALUTE:

CLOSED SESSION ACTION REPORT:

PUBLIC COMMENT:

This is the time for citizens to comment on subject matters within the jurisdiction of the Hanford City Council. This is also the public’s opportunity to request an item from the Consent Calendar be pulled for discussion purposes or to comment on any item on the agenda. State law does not allow the Council to discuss or take action on issues not on the agenda, except that members of the Council or staff may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons exercising their public testimony rights (Gov. Code sec. 54954.2). A maximum of three minutes is allowed for each speaker. Please begin your comments by stating your name and providing your city of residence.

CONSENT CALENDAR:

Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these matters unless a request is made and then the item will be removed from the Consent Calendar to be discussed and voted upon by a separate motion.

A. Waive reading in full of resolutions and ordinances and approval and adoption of same by reading the title only.

B. Community Development: Waiver of second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 26- 05, approving Zone Text Amendment No. 0013-26, a request to amend Title 15 Buildings and Construction of the Hanford Municipal Code, by adding Chapter 15.57, in order to implement a new Electric Vehicle Charging Station Permit Expediting Ordinance and create a streamlined EV charging station permitting process, in accordance with Assembly Bills 1236 and 970.

C. Utilities and Engineering: Approval of the reimbursement for Tract 934 to Lennar Homes of California, LLC. in the amount of $185,570.02 from the Transportation Impact Fee Fund (0181) for offsite improvements associated with the development.

D. Utilities and Engineering: Adopt Resolution 26-64-R, causing the incomplete sewer improvements that are obligation of Enclave 66, LLC (Developer) for Tract 915-Unit I and Tract 915-Unit II, to be completed by allowing the City Manager and his designees to undertake all necessary and appropriate action to complete the sewer improvements.

E. Utilities and Engineering: Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his or her designee to accept property dedications for public purposes.

F. IT: Approval of the three-year renewal of Microsoft software licensing through Dell Computer Corporation in the amount of $449,522.40, funded by the IT Services Fund (0415), an internal service fund allocated to all operational departments PUBLIC HEARING:

A. Community Development: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Consolidated Annual Performance Report (CAPER) PY25-26
B. Utilities and Engineering: First reading of Ordinance 26-06 to grant the City Manager authorization to accept, on behalf of the governing body, streets and roads or portions thereof, into the city street system and to record conveyances to the city of real property interests for street and road uses and purposes.

GENERAL BUSINESS:

A. Community Development: Staff presentation regarding the preliminary draft Objective Design Standards and Council input on the proposed standards and next steps COUNCIL REPORTS/GENERAL REPORTS:

Brief information-only reports from City Council and/or Staff, including committee reports and reports by City Council related to meetings attended at City expenses (AB1234).

A. INFORMATION REPORT — AUGUST WARRANT REGISTER
ITEMS FOR FUTURE AGENDAS:

At this time, any Council Member may ask a question for clarification or may request a matter, which is not otherwise scheduled on a City Council agenda, to be placed on a future agenda. The Council Member referring the item shall provide sufficient information as to the nature of the item. The City Council, by concurrence of a majority, may direct the City Manager to put the item on a future agenda. (GOV. CODE SEC. 54954.2) A. Council Future Agenda Items
B. Upcoming Events and Important Dates:

October 6: Hanford Night Out in Civic Park 4:00 p.m. - Sunset October 6: Regular City Council Meeting
October 20: Regular City Council Meeting
November 3: Regular City Council Meeting
November 17: Regular City Council Meeting
ADJOURNMENT:

Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available to public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office located at 319 N. Douty Street, Hanford, California 93230, during normal business hours. Such agendas are also available at the city’s website, www.cityofhanfordca.com subject to staff’s ability to post the agenda before the meeting. If you need a disability-related modification or accommodation, including

auxiliary aids or services, to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s office, 559-585-2515, 319 N.

Douty Street, Hanford, California 93230, at least 2 days prior to the meeting {28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II}

4.A.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 9/15/2026 AGENDA SECTION: STUDY SESSION AND

ACTION ITEMS

SUBJECT:

Receive a presentation from the Mid-Kings River Groundwater Sustainability Agency and consider a motion supporting the proposed land-based assessment and groundwater extraction fee to retain local control.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: Receive a presentation from the Mid-Kings River Groundwater Sustainability Agency and approve a motion supporting the proposed land-based assessment and groundwater extraction fee to retain local control.

Recommended Motion: I move to support the Mid-Kings River Groundwater Sustainability Agency's proposed land-based assessment and groundwater extraction fee to retain local control.

BACKGROUND:

The Mid-Kings River Groundwater Sustainability Agency is proposing a two-part funding package to support implementation of the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act and the agency’s Groundwater Sustainability Plan. The package consists of:
• A land-based assessment of up to $26.84 per acre, subject to approval through a Proposition 218 landowner election; and
• A groundwater extraction fee ranging from $7.41 to $19.24 per acre-foot between 2027 and 2031, subject to consideration by the GSA Board under Proposition 26.

The proposed revenues would support groundwater planning, monitoring, reporting, program administration, and mitigation activities. The funding would also assist the GSA in responding to the State’s probationary designation of the Tulare Lake Subbasin and maintaining local control over groundwater-management decisions. Many residents would pay less than $4 annually, according to the GSA.

If the proposed funding package is not approved, the GSA would continue to lack a stable funding source needed to fully implement its Groundwater Sustainability Plan. The absence of sufficient local funding and progress could result in continued or increased State oversight and, ultimately, development of a State-managed groundwater plan. Under a State-managed plan, decisions such as groundwater pumping limits would be made by the State, reducing local flexibility and potentially resulting in additional requirements and costs over which local agencies and landowners would have

limited control.

In consideration of potential fees, there are two options for property owners and groundwater users in the GSA to consider for the future:
- Adopt a fee and retain local control of the revenues
OR
- Do not adopt a fee, and risk having a State-managed plan and fee imposed in which local control would be limited

Table 1: Comparison of options

GSA representatives will provide an overview of the proposed rates, public process, and anticipated use of the revenues. Staff recommends that the City Council support the proposed funding package.

The GSA Board is scheduled to conduct a public hearing on September 29, 2026.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no direct fiscal impact associated with receiving the presentation or expressing support for the proposed rates. If approved, assessable properties within the GSA, would be subject to the land- based assessment and, where applicable, the groundwater extraction fee. The exact annual cost to individual property owners and the City would depend on assessable acreage and, where applicable, the volume of groundwater pumped.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. GSA Resident Handout

2. GSA General Handout

RESIDENTS | STAY INFORMED
Our Community Depends on Groundwater.

Help Keep Groundwater Decisions Close to Home.

Groundwater is a shared resource that supports our
homes, farms, and businesses. It provides water for
many households and helps sustain the agricultural
economy that supports local jobs and businesses
throughout the region.

Funding Local Groundwater
Management
The Mid-Kings River GSA is proposing a two-part
funding package to meet SGMA requirements and
regain local control over groundwater management.

Who Is Affected?
The funding package includes two separate
components: a land-based assessment and a
groundwater pumping fee.

Land-based assessment: Applies to assessable
acres within the Mid-Kings River GSA. Most property
owners are included in the proposed assessment,
with the exception of parks, schools, and cemeteries.

Groundwater pumping fee: This fee applies to
groundwater pumpers extracting more than 2 acre-
feet annually. If you are a rural resident pumping
less than 2 acre-feet for household use, you are
excluded from this fee. Public water systems will pay
the extraction fee for the groundwater used to serve
their businesses and residents.

The Mid-Kings River GSA serves:

Hanford
Armona
Home Garden
Hardwick
Surrounding rural and agricultural lands

MANY RESIDENTIAL PARCELS WOULD PAY
LESS THAN $4 ANNUALLY TO SUPPORT
LOCAL GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT.

Calculations are based on the proposed maximum
assessment of $26.84.

Assessment Breakdown by Property Size
6,000 Sq. Ft.
$3.76 Annually
1 Acre
$26.84 Annually
1400 W. Lacey Blvd., Bldg #6, Hanford, CA 93230 | midkingsrivergsa.org | [email protected] | (559) 852-2670 El R ico GS A
Gr ea ter
K a w eah GS A
Mid-K a w eah
GS A
N or th F ork
Kings GS A Kings R iver
East GS A
South F ork
Kings GS A
Cen tr al
Kings GS A
Mid-Kings
River GSA
?ÎE
?ªH
?eE
?ðH
H anford
Armona
H ardwick
H ome
Garden
?cE
Fresno
County
Tulare
County
Kings
County
H an f or d
Armona
F ar go
Gr ange ville
K en t
K ansas
J er se y
Den ver
J ack son
I daho
ht61
ht51
ht31
I ona
6th
Dover
11th
Elder
W Lace y
ht7
Flin t
H ouston
Ex celsior
ht41
K i n g s R i v e r
0 2 4
Miles
Mid-Kings R iver GS A
S urr ounding GS A s
City /Place
Coun ty
High w a y
Mid-King s River Groun dw a ter
Sus tainability Agen c y Loca tion Map
Prepared By
o7/23/2026 G:\Mid-Kings River GSA-2747\274726002-218 Outreach and Elect\400 GIS\Map\MKGSA_Outreach_Elect\MKGSA_Outreach_Elect.aprx

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Why is this funding package needed?
The Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA)
requires local agencies to achieve groundwater
sustainability by 2040. While SGMA established this
responsibility, it is an unfunded mandate that requires agencies to fund its implementation. A reliable funding source is needed to support the planning, monitoring,
reporting, and groundwater management activities
necessary to achieve sustainability.

The GSA is currently reliant on financial assistance
from primarily Kings County for its operations, which
is not a sustainable long-term solution. Without stable funding, the GSA cannot fully implement its Groundwater Sustainability Plan or effectively plan for the future.

This need has become more immediate because the
Tulare Lake Subbasin is on State probation, resulting in increased State oversight and additional fees. To move
beyond probation, the State must see that the basin has the funding to implement SGMA. Establishing a reliable
funding source is a critical step toward reducing further State oversight.

2. What am I being asked to do?
As a property owner, you are being asked to participate in the decision-making process. You can vote on the
proposed land-based assessment via ballot mailed
to property owners, and are invited to provide public
comment on the groundwater pumping fee.

3. Why does this funding package apply to
residential properties?
Groundwater is a shared resource that supports homes,
businesses and agriculture throughout the region.

Residential households rely on groundwater every
day. The Mid-Kings River GSA was formed to comply
with SGMA, which requires local agencies to manage
groundwater sustainably for the long-term benefit
of all groundwater users. The proposed assessment
revenue would help fund groundwater monitoring,
planning, reporting, and other efforts needed to ensure groundwater is available long into the future.

Both the proposed assessment and pumping fee are
proportional to the benefit or service received. The
assessment is charged on a per-acre basis, so smaller
residential parcels would generally pay less than larger agricultural properties.

4. What authority does the GSA have to
propose this funding package?
SGMA authorizes local agencies like the Mid-Kings
River GSA to establish assessments and fees to
fund groundwater sustainability activities. The GSA
is committed to public transparency throughout the
process of adopting new assessments and fees.

5. How do I participate in the funding
package decision-making process?
Land-based assessment (Proposition 218): Property
owners can participate by voting on the assessment using the ballot mailed in August. Ballots must be returned prior to the close of the Public Hearing scheduled for September 29th at 1:00 p.m.

Pumping fee (Proposition 26): Landowners may submit
a public comment by mail, in person, or online. Visit
midkingsrivergsa.org/localfunding or review the instructions provided in the mailed Public Notice.

6. What happens if the proposed funding
package is not approved?
If the proposed funding package fails, the GSA will lack the funding required to continue managing groundwater
on local stakeholders’ behalf. SGMA was designed to
keep groundwater management in local hands, but the
State steps in if local agencies do not demonstrate
sufficient progress. The Tulare Lake Subbasin is currently on State probation, meaning the State has already
increased its oversight over our groundwater. Without
a stable funding source, the risk of continued State
involvement in groundwater management increases.

7. How was the budget developed?
Budget priorities, expenditures, and programs are
discussed openly and are subject to public review.

The 5-year annual budget included in the Engineer’s
Report and Cost-of-Service Study as part of this funding proposal were developed in close consultation with the
Stakeholder Advisory Committee, who have gathered
around the table for over a year to discuss SGMA’s
urgent priorities and build forward momentum for local
implementation.

8. Why does the proposed assessment
indicate a “maximum” rate?
If approved, the assessment establishes a maximum
annual rate the Mid-Kings River GSA Board may adopt.

Each year, the Board will review the agency’s budget
and set the rates based on funding needs, not to exceed the proposed $26.84 per acre maximum. The Board may
adopt lower rates, but it cannot exceed the approved
maximum rates without going back to the landowners
for approval through a Proposition 218 election.

9. I am a homeowner in a community or
city. How does this apply to me?
If you own property within the Mid-Kings River GSA,
the proposed land-based assessment applies to
your property. If approved, property owners would be
responsible for paying the assessment. For homes
served by a community or municipal water system, the
groundwater used will be subject to the groundwater
pumping fee.
1400 W. Lacey Blvd., Bldg #6, Hanford, CA 93230 | midkingsrivergsa.org | [email protected] | (559) 852-2670

KINGS COUNTY | STAY INFORMED
We All Depend On Groundwater.

Help Keep Groundwater Decisions Close To Home.
2014: SGMA BECOMES CALIFORNIA LAW
SGMA was designed to give local communities like
ours the opportunity to design their own path to
sustainability. But SGMA is an unfunded mandate
and requires local investments in groundwater
management.
2024: Basin Put On Probation
The State serves as the regulatory backstop and
intervenes if local agencies fail to meet SGMA’s
requirements. The State voted to put the Tulare
Lake Subbasin on probation after our Groundwater
Sustainability Plan did not provide sufficient evidence that the basin would achieve sustainability by the
2040 deadline.

How Did We Get Here?
Sustainable Groundwater Management Act
2026: At Risk
If probation continues, the State will take further
action and advance its own groundwater plan.

Under a full State-managed plan, local flexibility
would be greatly reduced. Decisions like how much
groundwater landowners can pump would be made by
State regulators with no tailoring to local conditions.

Learn More About Our Current Journey Under
SGMA and Proposed Funding Plan:

The GSA is proposing a funding plan to meet State
requirements under SGMA, regain local control
over groundwater management, and ensure the
long-term sustainability of this water source that
is critical to our community.

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW
Why You Are Receiving
This Mailing Notice.

You are receiving this mailing notice because your
property is located within the Mid-Kings River GSA
service area and is affected by the enclosed funding
package.

Mid-Kings River GSA is your groundwater agency
responsible for locally implementing the Sustainable
Groundwater Management Act (SGMA), which requires
critically overdrafted groundwater basins, like ours, to achieve sustainability by 2040.

Who We Are
We Make Local Groundwater Decisions
Encompasses ~97,300 acres (152 square miles)
Located in the northeastern portion of the
Tulare Lake Subbasin in Kings County
Serves Hanford, Armona, Home Garden,
Hardwick and the surrounding rural and
agricultural lands
Manages groundwater sustainably for farms,
businesses, and residents
Led by a Stakeholder Advisory Committee made
up of growers and community leaders

PROPOSED

FUNDING
PACKAGE$
The Road Ahead:

A reliable funding source is needed to exit probation
and manage groundwater sustainably for our area.

This is what local management looks like:

Locally Driven Sustainability Solutions
Greater Stakeholder Involvement
Improved Coordination Across the Basin
Transparent & Data-Informed Decision-Making
Accountability to the Local Community
1400 W. Lacey Blvd., Bldg #6, Hanford, CA 93230 | midkingsrivergsa.org | [email protected] | (559) 852-2670

THE PATH FORWARD
Proposed Funding Would Support Efforts to
Keep Groundwater Decisions Close to Home.

Limit State Intervention. Protect Local Control.

AUGUST 24 - 1:00 PM
Hanford Civic
Auditorium
400 N. Douty St,
Hanford, CA 93230
AUGUST 25 - 5:30 PM
Hanford Civic
Auditorium
400 N. Douty St,
Hanford, CA 93230
I Am a
Resident Grower
TO JOIN THE WORKSHOP VIRTUALLY , VISIT:
midkingsrivergsa.org/localfunding
I Am a
Engage With Us
midkingsrivergsa.org/resident-handout
What the Funds Support:

A reliable funding source is a critical piece of the effort to keep groundwater management in the hands of the
local community. It would provide the revenue needed
to implement SGMA, meet State requirements, and
demonstrate the basin has financial capacity to return
groundwater management to local control.

Proposed Plan:

The proposed funding package includes an annual
land-based assessment of up to $26.84 per acre for
property owners, and a groundwater pumping fee of up
to $19.24 per acre-foot annually.

Greater Stakeholder Involvement
Locally Driven Solutions
Basin-Wide Coordination
Transparency & Accountability

IF NO FUNDING IS ESTABLISHED
What’s At Risk?
The State requires groundwater sustainability. The
question is whether local agencies have the funding,
tools, and capacity needed to achieve it locally.

Funding Fails:

Sacramento Makes
Decisions
One-Size-Fits-All
Strict Policies
Reduced Local
Influence
Only Top-Down
Groundwater Control
State-Developed Plans
With Unknown Costs
Funding Approved:

Local Landowners
Provide Solutions
Tailor Policies to
Local Conditions
Continued Stakeholder
Involvement
Accountability to
Local Landowners
Local Plans With
Transparent Fees
midkingsrivergsa.org/grower-handout

GROUNDWATER
PUMPERS:

Pumping Extraction
Fee Maximum of
$19.24 / acre-foot

PROPERTY
OWNERS:

Land-Based
Assessment Maximum
of $26.84 / acre

JOIN IN-PERSON OR ONLINE
1400 W. Lacey Blvd., Bldg #6, Hanford, CA 93230 | midkingsrivergsa.org | [email protected] | (559) 852-2670 PUBLIC
WORKSHOP #1
PUBLIC
WORKSHOP #2

4.B.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 9/15/2026 AGENDA SECTION: STUDY SESSION AND

ACTION ITEMS

SUBJECT:

Flock Safety Overview

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: Receive and discuss a presentation from staff regarding an overview of the Flock Safety public safety technology platform, including its Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) system, camera network capabilities, privacy safeguards, authorized uses, and benefits to our law enforcement operations as well as public safety.

Recommended Motion: This is an informational item and no action is required.

BACKGROUND:

The Hanford Police Department implemented the Flock Safety Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) camera system in early 2023, after approval by Council in February of 2022. Flock was implemented as a tool to enhance public safety and support criminal investigations. Since its implementation, the system has proven to be a valuable investigative resource by assisting officers in locating stolen vehicles, identifying suspect vehicles associated with criminal activity, and generating investigative leads in cases involving violent crimes, property crimes, and missing persons.

While the program has been successful in supporting law enforcement operations, some community members have expressed concerns regarding privacy and the use of ALPR technology. In response to those concerns and at the request of City Council, staff is providing this presentation as an overview of the Flock Safety system, explaining how the technology is used, discussing the policies and safeguards governing its operation, and answering questions from the City Council and the public.

The Hanford Police Department utilizes the system solely for legitimate law enforcement purposes and in accordance with applicable federal and state laws, department policy, and established privacy and data security standards. Access to the system is restricted to authorized personnel, all searches are subject to audit, and data is retained only for the period authorized by law and department policy.

The purpose of this study session is to provide transparency regarding the use of the ALPR system, review its operational benefits and privacy protections, and allow for an discussion regarding the Department's use of the technology.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no additional fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. This is an informational study session only, and no action is being requested of the City Council.

STRATEGIC GOAL: Indicates which City Strategic Goal(s) this item supports.

Check all that apply.

☐
Quality of
Life
☐
Community
Engagement
☐
Fiscal
Sustainability
☐
Efficient &
High
Performing
Government

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Letter of support

2. Joint Law Enforcement Statement on ALPR

COUNTY OF KINGS

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY
SARAH M. HACKER

1400 West Lacey Boulevard Hanford, California 93230 | 559.582.0326

August 27, 2026

To the Hanford City Council,

As the Kings County District Attorney, I am writing to express support for the City of Hanford’s continued use of Flock Safety Automated License Plate Readers or FLOCK system . This technology is indispensable to modern criminal investigation. Discontinuing the FLOCK system would strip law enforcement of a vital tool, thus compromising public safety.

The practical value of this system is demonstrated daily across the full spectrum of criminal justice operations. In routine property crimes, real -time automated alerts enable officers to locate stolen vehicles, return property to victims, and prevent thos e cars from being utilized in secondary offenses.

In violent incidents such as drive- by shootings, where eyewitness accounts are often limited and suspects are difficult to identify, F LOCK data provides the critical leads necessary to solve cases .

Furthermore, our office relies on this technology in nearly every homicide investigation to establish precise timelines, track suspect vehicles, and corroborate evidence for trial. In the most urgent emergencies—including child abductions and kidnapping cases—these cameras provide an immediate grid that allows law enforcement to track fleeing vehicles and save lives when seconds matter most.

While our office respects community concerns regarding civil liberties, the perception that F LOCK cameras unreasonably intrude into personal privacy is simply untrue. These cameras capture objective vehicle data in public spaces where citizens already interact with commercial security systems, residential doorbell cameras, and dashcams every single day. F LOCK does not utilize facial recognition, track personal identities, or peer into private lives; it merely documents vehicles traveling on public roadways to aid legitimate law enforcement investigations under strict access protocols.

Removing this system would remove an essential shield protecting Hanford’s residents. I urge the City Council to maintain the Flock camera program, and thus ensure our officers and prosecutors retain the resources needed to keep our community safe.

Sincerely,

Sarah M. Hacker
Kings County District Attorney

Joint Statement on Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) Technology

Association of State Criminal Investigative Agencies (ASCIA) Major Cities Chiefs Association (MCCA)
Major County Sheriffs of America (MCSA)
National Alliance of State Drug Enforcement Agencies (NASDEA) National Fusion Center Association (NFCA)
National High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTA) Directors Association (NHDA) National Narcotic Officers' Associations' Coalition (NNOAC) National Real Time Crime Center Association (NRTCCA)
National Sheriffs’ Association (NSA)
Small and Rural Law Enforcement Executives Association (SRLEEA)

As organizations representing state and local law enforcement across the country, we recognize and take seriously the concerns being raised about ALPR technology.

We are listening. We want to work with policymakers and the communities we serve to address these concerns and ensure this technology continues to be used responsibly. At the same time, we believe it is important that this conversation fully consider how ALPR technology is being used every day in communities across the country - to locate missing children, find victims, solve serious crimes, and keep our communities safe.

ALPRs help save lives.

When a child is missing, a trafficking victim is being moved across jurisdictions, or a violent offender is on the road, every minute matters. ALPR technology gives investigators a critical lead in seconds - helping law enforcement find someone in danger, identify a dangerous suspect, or connect a vehicle to a serious crime before that opportunity is lost.

That happens every day across the country. Law enforcement agencies responsibly use ALPRs to locate missing and endangered children, find trafficking and kidnapping victims, identify vehicles connected to homicides, shootings, and other violent crimes, locate dangerous suspects

and fugitives, and recover stolen vehicles. ALPRs also help investigators connect criminal activity across jurisdictions and provide critical leads in complex investigations involving drug trafficking, organized crime, and transnational criminal organizations.

For agencies large and small, in many cases ALPR technology helps dramatically reduce the time it takes to identify a vehicle connected to a crime or other public safety incident that can not be accomplished with any other investigative resource. ALPRs do not photograph or identify people; they only photograph (not video) cars and license plates on roadways. ALPR does not replace an investigator. It does not establish guilt. It must be verified before enforcement action is taken. But it provides an investigative lead - often at the moment that lead matters most.

We welcome meaningful safeguards and accountability.

State and local law enforcement agencies responsibly use ALPR technology under policies, controls, and oversight designed to ensure it is used for legitimate law enforcement purposes and to protect against misuse. In most places, access is restricted to authorized personnel through individual user credentials and other access controls, while audit logs create a record of queries and allow agencies to identify and investigate potential misuse. Policies also establish requirements for data retention and sharing, security, training, and supervisory oversight.

Responsible data sharing is critical to the effectiveness of ALPR technology. Missing and endangered persons, trafficking victims, dangerous offenders, and criminal activity do not stop at jurisdictional boundaries. The ability of law enforcement agencies to appropriately share and query ALPR information across jurisdictions can help investigators connect cases, locate people in danger, and identify suspects who have moved from one community or state to another. That capability can be particularly important in time-sensitive investigations, and it should be governed by clear policies, appropriate access controls, auditing, and accountability.

These safeguards are fundamental to the responsible use of ALPR technology. They protect against misuse and help ensure this important tool is used for legitimate public safety purposes.

And when someone abuses that access, there should be consequences. Misuse of ALPR technology - like misuse of any law enforcement investigative tool - should not be tolerated.

As technology evolves, law enforcement is committed to evaluating and strengthening the safeguards that govern the use of ALPR technology. We stand ready to work with policymakers at the federal, state, and local levels to hear concerns, examine where additional protections may be appropriate, and develop a path forward that reinforces accountability while preserving legitimate public safety use of ALPR.

We can protect against abuse while ensuring law enforcement continues to have access to a tool that helps find missing children and trafficking victims, locate violent offenders, solve serious crimes, and save lives.

12.B.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 9/15/2026 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Waiver of second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 26-05, approving Zone Text Amendment No. 0013-26, a request to amend Title 15 Buildings and Construction of the Hanford Municipal Code, by adding Chapter 15.57, in order to implement a new Electric Vehicle Charging Station Permit Expediting Ordinance and create a streamlined EV charging station permitting process, in accordance with Assembly Bills 1236 and 970.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: Waive second reading of Ordinance No. 2026-05 and adopt Zone Text Amendment 0013-26.

Recommended Motion: I move to waive the second reading of and adopt Ordinance No. 2026-05, approving Zone Text Amendment 0013-26.

BACKGROUND:

The project is a request to amend Title 15 Buildings and Construction of the Hanford Municipal Code, by adding Chapter 15.57, in order to implement a new Electric Vehicle Charging Station Permit Expediting Ordinance and create a streamlined EV charging station permitting process, in accordance with Assembly Bills 1236 and 970.

Utilizing the AB -1236/AB 970 Checklist for Permitting Electric Vehicle Service Stations (EVCS) for Residential and Non-Residential, staff integrated the checklist items into two separate applications (Residential and Non-Residential) to be accessed by the applicant through City of Hanford’s Citizen Self Service Portal. This portal is the existing system used by applicants for the permit application process. The new checklist and permitting timeline will bring Hanford into compliance with AB 1236 and AB 970.

The proposed ordinance was presented to the City of Hanford Planning Commission on August 11, 2026. The item was recommended for approval to the City Council by the Planning Commission on a 5, 0 vote by adoption of Resolution No. 2026-14.

In taking action on a Zone Text Amendment, the City Council must make the appropriate findings in accordance with the Hanford Municipal Code:

A zone text amendment may be approved if all of the following findings shall be made by the reviewing authority:

1. That the amendment is internally consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance;

ANALYSIS: That according to General Plan Policy T95, the City of Hanford shall promote and encourage the installation and use of electric vehicle (EV) charging stations and remove obstacles to their use as well as minimizing costs of permitting. The adoption of Section 15.57 of the Hanford Municipal Code is consistent with the policies of the General Plan, as it promotes and encourages the installation of EV charging stations and streamlines the permitting process.

2. That the amendment would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of the community;

ANALYSIS: That the adoption of Section 15.57 of the Hanford Municipal Code is not detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of the community. Specifically, Section 15.57 identifies the intent of the ordinance to encourage the installation of electric vehicle charging stations by removing obstacles to permitting for charging stations, so long as the action does not supersede the Building Official’s authority to address higher priority life-safety situations. If the Building Official makes a finding based on substantial evidence that the electric vehicle charging station could have a specific adverse impact upon the public health or safety, as defined in Government Code 65850.7, the City may require the applicant to apply for a use permit. The language ensures the amendment would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of the community.

3. That the amendment would maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the City; and

ANALYSIS: That the amendment will not affect the balance of land uses within the City of Hanford.

The zone text amendment pertains to EV permitting processes, only.

4. That the anticipated land uses on the subject site would be compatible with existing and future surrounding uses.

ANALYSIS: That the zone text amendment applies to EV permitting processes in all zone districts.

EV charging stations are allowed in all zone districts, in accordance with AB1236 and 970. The adoption of the ordinance ensures that the use will not create a significant adverse impact on public health and safety. Public health and safety impacts, as defined in Government Code 65850.7,will be considered when addressing land use compatibility.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Proposed Ordinance

2. Notice of Exemption

3. Ordinance 26-05

Attachment 1

Chapter 15.57

ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION PERMIT EXPEDITING ORDINANCE Sections

15.57.010 Title, words, and phrases.

15.57.020 Expedited electric vehicle charging station permitting.

15.57.030 Expedited review process.

15.57.040 Electronic submittals.

15.57.050 Association approval.

15.57.060 Permit application processing.

15.57.070 Technical review.

15.57.080 Inconsistencies.

15.57.090 Partial invalidity.

15.57.010 Title, words, and phrases.

This Ordinance shall be known as the City of Hanford Electric Vehicle Charging Station Permit Streamlining Ordinance. The purpose of this Ordinan ce is to establish an expedited, streamlined, and nondiscretionary permitting process for electric vehicle charging stations in accordance with Government Code Sections 65850.7 and 65850.71, as may be amended. Accordance w ith the definitions contained in Government Code Sections 65850.7 and 65850.71, except where specifically defined by the Ordinance.

15.57.020 Expedited electric vehicle charging station permitting.

Electric Vehicle Charging Stations applications qualifying for expedited administrative review pursuant to Government Code Sections 65850.7 and 65850.71, shall be subject to the administrative permitting procedures set forth in the City’s Electric Vehicle Charging Station Permit Expediting Ordinance.

15.57.030 Expedited review process.

Consistent with Government Code Section 65850.7, the Building Official shall implement an expedited administrative permit review process for electric vehi cle charging stations, and adopt a checklist of all requirements with which electric vehicle charging stati ons shall comply with in order to be eligible for expedited review. The expedited administrative pe rmit review process and checklist may refer to the recommendations in the checklist prescribed by the most current electric vehicle charging station permitting guidance or successor guidance published by the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development (GO-Bix), California Building Officials (CALBO), or another applicable State agency.

15.57.040 Electronic submittals.

Consistent with Government Code Section 65850.7, the Building Official shall allow for electronic submittal of permit applications covered by this Ordinance and assoc iated supporting documentation. In accepting such permit applications, the Building Official shall also accept electronic signatures on all forms, applications, and other documentation in lieu of a wet signature by any applicant.

15.57.050 Association approval.

Consistent with Government Code Section 65850.7, the Building Official shall not condition the approval for any electric vehicle charging station permit on the ap proval of such a system by an association, as that term is defined by Civil Code Section 4080.

15.57.060 Permit application processing
A. A permit application that satisfies the informati on requirements contained in the City's adopted Electric Vehicle Charging Station Permit Checklist shall be accepted for review and processed in accordance with Government Code Sections 65850.7 and 65850.71. “A permit application that satisfies the information requirements contained in the City's adopted Electric Vehicle Charging Station Permit Checklist shall be accepted for review and processed in accordance with Government Code Sections 65850.7 and 65850.71.

B. Upon determining that a permit application and supporting documentation satisfy the requirements of the City's adopted checklist a nd comply with applicable provisions of state and local law, the Building Official shall administratively approve th e application and issue all required permits. If the Building Official determines that the permit application is incomplete, the Building Official shall provide the applicant with one written correction notice identifying all known deficiencies in the application and any additional information required to complete the review. Upon resubmittal, the Building Official shall review the revise d application in accordance with the timeframes established by Government Code Sections 65850.7 and 65850.71.

C. Issuance of a permit under this Ordinance does not authorize the charging station to be energized or placed into service until all required inspecti ons have been complete d and final approval has been granted by the Building Official.

15.57.070 Technical review.

It is the intent of this Ordinance to encourage the installation of electric vehicle charging stations by removing obstacles to permitting for charging stations so long as the action does not supersede the Building Official’s authority to address higher priority life-safety situations. If the Building Official makes a finding based on substantial evidence that the electric vehicle charging station could have a specific adverse impact upon the public health or safety, as defined in Government Code 65850.7, the City may require the applicant to apply for a use permit. The City shall not require di scretionary review unless specifically authorized by Government Code Section 65850.7 and 65850.71.

15.57.080 Inconsistencies.

Any provision of the City of Hanford Municipal C ode or appendices thereto, inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistencies and no further, are hereby repealed or modified to that extent necessary to affect the provisions of this Ordinance.

15.57.090 Partial invalidity.

If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of any competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordina nce. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each and every Section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the Ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Notice of Exemption 2026-46

To: Office of Planning and Research
P.O. Box 3044, Room 212
Sacramento, CA 95812-3044

County Clerk
County of Kings
Kings County Government Center
Hanford, CA 93230

From: City of Hanford
317 North Douty Street
Hanford, CA 93230

Project Title: Zone Text Amendment No. 0013-26

Project Location – City of Hanford

Project Location – City: Hanford Project Location – County: Kings County

Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project: Zone Text Amendment No. 0013-26: a request to amend Title 15 Buildings and Construction of the Hanford Municipal Code, by adding Chapter 15.57, in order to implement a new Expedited Electric Vehicle Charging Station Permitting Ordinance and create a streamlined EV charging station permitting process, in accordance with Assembly Bills 1236 and 970.

Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City of Hanford, Planning Division

Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: City of Hanford

Exempt Status: (check one)

Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); 152698);
Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269 (a));
Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c));
Categorical Exemption: State type and section number:

Statutory Exemption. State code number: 15061(b)(3) General Rule

Reasons why project is exempt:

The proposed ordinance is exempt under Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed project is a text amendment that is not associated with a physical development; therefore, there are no physical impacts that will result from the project.

Lead Agency
Contact Person: Maddison Faria Area Code/ Telephone: (559) 415-7183

Signature: Date: September 1, 2026 Title: Assistant Planner

Signed by Lead Agency Date received for filing at OPR:

Signed by Applicant

ORDINANCE NO. 26-05

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HANFORD APPROVING ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 0013-26, A REQUEST TO AMEND TITLE 15 OF THE HANFORD MUNICIPAL CODE ADDING SECTION 15.57, IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT A

NEW EXPEDITED ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION PERMITTING

ORDINANCE AND CREATE A STREAMLINED EV CHARGING STATION PERMITTING PROCESS.

LOCATION: CITYWIDE

The City Council of the City of Hanford does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1: The Hanford Municipal Code Title 15, the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, contains regulations to ensure the public health, safety, peace, comfort, convenience, prosperity and general welfare of the citizens of Hanford, including building, fire, and electrical codes.

SECTION 2: The City Council has held a public hearing on the Zone Text Amendment No. 0013-26, to amend Title 15 of the Hanford Municipal Code adding Section 15.57, in order to implement a new Expedited Electric Vehicle Charging Station Permitting Ordinance and create a streamlined EV charging station permitting process. The proposed ordinance changes are attached as Exhibit A;

SECTION 3: The City Council finds that the adoption of this ordinance is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the following section of the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code of Regulations, Chapter 3.

a) The ordinance is exempt under Section 15061(b) (3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.

SECTION 4: The proposed amendment was evaluated for consistency with the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance and based on the following findings:

1. That the amendment is internally consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance;

Analysis: That according to General Plan Policy T95, the City of Hanford shall promote and encourage the installation and use of electric vehicle (EV) charging stations and remove obstacles to their use as well as

minimizing costs of permitting. The adoption of Section 15.57 of the Hanford Municipal Code is consistent with the policies of the General Plan, as it promotes and encourages the installation of EV charging stations and streamlines the permitting process.

2. That the amendment would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of the community;

Analysis: That the adoption of Section 15.57 of the Hanford Municipal Code is not detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of the community. Specifically, Section 15.57 identifies the intent of the ordinance to encourage the installation of electric vehicle charging stations by removing obstacles to permitting for charging stations, so long as the action does not supersede the Building Official’s authority to address higher priority life-safety situations. If the Building Official makes a finding based on substantial evidence that the electric vehicle charging station could have a specific adverse impact upon the public health or safety, as defined in Government Code 65850.7, the City may require the applicant to apply for a use permit. The language ensures the amendment would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of the community.

3. That the amendment would maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the City; and

Analysis: That the amendment will not affect the balance of land uses within the City of Hanford. The zone text amendment pertains to EV permitting processes, only.

4. That the anticipated land uses on the subject site would be compatible with existing and future surrounding uses.

Analysis: That the zone text amendment applies to EV permitting processes in all zone districts. EV charging stations are allowed in all zone districts, in accordance with AB1236 and 970. The adoption of the ordinance ensures that the use will not create a significant adverse impact on public health and safety. Public health and safety impacts, as defined in Government Code 65850.7,will be considered when addressing land use compatibility.

SECTION 5: The City Council of the City of Hanford does ordain that Title 15 is hereby amended, as shown in Exhibit A.

SECTION 6: That the ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its passage, and shall be published once in the Hanford Sentinel within fifteen (15) days after its passage or a summary of this ordinance shall be published in the Hanford Sentinel in a manner consistent with the requirements of the California Government Code.

Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford duly called and held on September 15, 2026, by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

APPROVED

____________________________
Mark Kairis
MAYOR of the City of Hanford

ATTEST:

________________________
Natalie Corral

CITY CLERK

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF KINGS ) ss

CITY OF HANFORD )

I, NATALIE CORRAL, City Clerk of the City of Hanford, do hereby certify the foregoing ordinance was duly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford on the 1 st day of September, 2026, and it was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford held on the 15th day of September 2026.

NATALIE CORRAL

CITY CLERK

Exhibit A
Zone Text Amendment No. 0013-26

Note: not included as part of the agenda packet, since it appears as Attachment 1

12.C.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 9/15/2026 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Approval of the reimbursement for Tract 934 to Lennar Homes of California, LLC. in the amount of $185,570.02 from the Transportation Impact Fee Fund (0181) for offsite improvements associated with the development.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation:

Authorize the reimbursement to Lennar Homes of California, LLC. in the amount of $185,570.02 from the Transportation Impact Fee Fund (0181) for offsite improvements associated with the development of Tract 934.

Recommended Motion:

Authorize the reimbursement to Lennar Homes of California, LLC. in the amount of $185,570.02 from the Transportation Impact Fee Fund (0181) for offsite improvements associated with the development of Tract 934.

BACKGROUND:

Tract 934, a 161-lot Lennar Homes of California, LLC. (Lennar Homes) subdivision located on the southeast corner of Grangeville Boulevard and 13th Avenue as shown in the attached aerial maps, was approved by Resolution 2021-29 by the Planning Commission on April 12, 2022.

The Final Map for Tract No. 934, recorded with Kings County Recorder’s Office on August 14, 2023.

Lennar Homes received Notice of Completion for Tract 934 by City Council on January 20, 2026. The Final Map and Notice of Completion are attached for reference.

Offsite improvements were constructed as described below, concurrently with the Lennar Homes Tract 934 development along Grangeville Boulevard frontage that conform with the requirements of the City’s Municipal Code section 15.48, for reimbursement of offsite improvements constructed within roadways identified on the City’s General Plan Circulation Map.

Offsite improvements consist of:

A sixteen-foot (16’) wide concrete median with turn pockets on Grangeville Boulevard with decorative stamped and colored concrete.

Asphalt pavement in varying widths, not to exceed twenty-two feet (22’) from centerline of the roadway. Varying widths are measured beyond the meandering design of the median curbing.

Right-of-way exceeding a forty-two-foot (42’) half width as measured from the centerline of the roadway. Lennar Homes dedicated an additional thirteen feet (13’) of right-of-way width along

Grangeville Boulevard to achieve a fifty-five-foot (55’) half width as required. Costs associated with the improvements within this additional right-of-way were at the expense of the developer as their required frontage improvement.

On April 3, 2026, Lennar Homes submitted a request for reimbursement of improvements associated with Tract 934. On August 24, 2026, City Staff provided a Reimbursement Agreement to Lennar Homes to memorialize items that were agreed to by the City and Lennar Homes, that conform with the City’s reimbursement program as referenced in the City’s Impact Fee Study and Municipal Code.

With City Council’s approval, City Staff will execute the attached Reimbursement Agreement.

All required fees have been paid. The Aerial Maps, Final Map, Reimbursement Agreement, and the developer’s warranty bond are attached for council review.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2021-100, and all notices related thereto were prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City of Hanford Municipal Code and Policies.

PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION:

City Council approved the Notice of Completion for Tract 934 on January 20, 2026.

City Council approved the Final Map for Tract 934 on August 1, 2023.

PRIOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:

Planning Commission approved the tentative map for Tract 934 on April 12, 2022.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The FY26/27 Transportation Impact Fee Fund budget has an approximate balance of $1.6 million for developer reimbursements (21810000-826637). A reimbursement in the amount of $185,570.02 will be needed from this fund for offsite improvements associated with the development.

All remaining subdivision improvements have been constructed at the developer’s expense.

STRATEGIC GOAL: Indicates which City Strategic Goal(s) this item supports.

Check all that apply.
☐
Quality
of
Life
☐
Community
Engagement
☐
Fiscal
Sustainability
☐
Efficient & High
Performing
Government

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Aerial Maps-Tract 934

2. Tract 934 - Final Map

3. Tract 934 - Notice of Completion

4. Reimbursement Agreement

5. Tr. 934 - WarrantyBond

B
TRACT 934
LENNAR TRACT 934

B
TRACT 934

Melody Haigh
Entitlements Manager
Lennar Homes of California, LLC.
5 River Park Place East, Suite 210
Fresno, CA 93720 August 24, 2026

Re: Reimbursement Agreement
Ms. Haigh,
In response to a reimbursement request submitted to the City of Hanford (City) on April 3, 2026, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC. (Lennar Homes) for the sum of $437,527.95, the City has reviewed your submitted request to verify the reimbursable items that are in conformance with the City’s Municipal Code section 15.48 and the City’s 2019 Development Impact Fee Study. In an email dated August 19, 2026, you agreed with the total reimbursement amount that conforms with the City’s reimbursement program and that has been adjusted from the requested amount.

The City agrees to reimburse in the amount of $185,570.02, for improvements completed on Grangeville Boulevard and within the City’s right-of-way concurrent with the development of Lennar Homes Tract 934.

Lennar Homes Tract 934 was completed on 12/15/2025 and received Notice of Completion from City Council on 1/20/2026.

Below is an itemized list of improvements identified as reimbursable to Lennar Homes.

UNIT TOTAL UNITS $/UNIT TOTAL REIMBURSABLE NOTESLF 1,076 $24.14 $25,974.64LF 168 $193.14 $32,447.52using 16' wide section at 49' and bay tapers. Bay tapers at 119' combinedMedian concrete- less that 16'LF239$48.29$11,541.31using 4' width. Using 1/4 costLFVARIES BY WIDTH OF PAVING$96.07 p/lf $78.78 p/lf $60.52 p/lf $43.23 p/lf $28.82 p/lf $17.29 p/lf $65,450.48151 LF @ 22' WIDTH 120 LF @ 18' WIDTH 266 LF @ 14' WIDTH 301 LF @ 10' WIDTH 36 LF @ 6.5' WIDTH 656 LF @ 4' WIDTH SF 20,143 $2.49 $50,156.07 13' beyond 42' for a total of 55'TOTAL:$185,570.02Full height median curbMedian concrete- 16' widePavement (one side-22' wide)ROW exceeding 42' half widthStreet type- Arterial

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________ ___________ Melody Haigh Date Entitlements Manager
Lennar Homes of California, LLC.

______________________________________ ___________ Frank Senteno Date Director, Utilities and Engineering
City of Hanford
8/24/2026

12.D.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 9/15/2026 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Adopt Resolution 26-64-R, causing the incomplete sewer improvements that are obligation of Enclave 66, LLC (Developer) for Tract 915-Unit I and Tract 915-Unit II, to be completed by allowing the City Manager and his designees to undertake all necessary and appropriate action to complete the sewer improvements.

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation:

That the City Council adopt Resolution 26-64-R, causing the incomplete sewer improvements that are obligation of Enclave 66, LLC (Developer) for Tract 915-Unit I and Tract 915-Unit II, to be completed by allowing the City Manager and his designees to undertake all necessary and appropriate action to complete the sewer improvements.

Recommended Motion:

I move to adopt Resolution 26-64-R, causing the incomplete sewer improvements that are obligation of Enclave 66, LLC for Tract 915-Unit I and Tract 915-Unit II, to be completed by allowing the City Manager and his designees to undertake all necessary and appropriate action to complete the sewer improvements.

BACKGROUND:

Enclave 66 LLC. (Developer), failed to meet the requirements of Section §16.24.110 of the Hanford Municipal Code, which stipulates that the subdivision improvements must be completed within twenty- four (24) months after the July 21, 2023 recording of the final map, unless an extension is granted by Council. The Developer failed to complete the improvements for Tract 915-1 and 915-2 within the stipulated timeframe and did not request an extension within the required minimum thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the Subdivision Improvement Agreements (Agreements). The Agreements have expired.

Multiple attempts were made by City staff to work with the Developer to rectify the issue and extend the Agreement terms to allow the Developer to complete the outstanding improvements; however, the Developer neglected to perform, and the tracts remain incomplete. Therefore, the Developer is in breach of the Agreements, leaving both phases of development with a substantial number of outstanding improvements.

In the interest of avoiding delay of other developments in the area that are reliant on the sanitary sewer lift station and conveyance piping (sewer improvements) conditioned to be completed with Tract 915-1, ordering the uncompleted sewer improvements to be completed will allow city staff to

seek construction by other developments and potentially collect from the Developer’s performance bonds to cover the Developer's fair-share costs. This action is consistent with Hanford Municipal Code § 16.24.110 Completion of improvements A: Subdivisions of Five or More Parcels. The subdivision improvements shall be completed by the subdivider within 24 months, or such time as approved by the city engineer, not to exceed a period of 36 months, after the recording of the final map, unless an extension is granted by the council. The improvements shall be completed prior to the final building inspection or occupancy of any unit within the subdivision. "Should the subdivider fail to complete the improvements within the specified time, the city, by resolution of the council and at its option, may cause any or all uncompleted improvements to be completed, and the parties executing the improvement security shall be firmly bound for the payment of all necessary costs."

This action will not relieve the Developer of any other required outstanding improvements including, but not limited to, collector street paving, frontage landscaping, and storm basin outfall structure installation, nor allow occupancy of any existing residential structures until a Notice of Completion is filed. The location of the Tract 915-1 and 915-2 subdivisions are provided on the attached aerial maps.

On June 26, 2018, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 2018-16 to allow Vesting Tentative Tract 915, a request by the Developer to subdivide a 14.29-acre parcel into 66 residential lots in the R-L-5 Low-Density Residential zone district, with a planned unit development overlay.

By adoption of Resolution 2020-06 on June 9, 2020, the Planning Commission granted a 24-month extension of Tentative Tract 915 and Planned Unit Development No. 2018-01 (Amendment #1). The extension set a new expiration date of June 26, 2022 for Tentative Tract 915.

A Tentative Subdivision Agreement was executed between the Developer and City on June 6, 2022, allowing the Developer to install improvements within the boundary of the developments prior to recording a final map or providing security bonds.

On July 18, 2023, final Subdivision Improvement Agreements for Tract 915-1 and Tract 915-2 were executed. The final maps for both Tract 915-1 and Tract 915-2 subdivisions are attached for reference, consisting of a 26-lot subdivision and a 40-lot subdivision respectively, and recorded with Kings County Recorder’s Office on July 21, 2023. Due to a portion of the improvements being completed under the Tentative Subdivision Improvement Agreement, the Developer provided reduced bonds for the final Subdivision Improvement Agreements reflecting the cost for remaining improvements to be installed.

The Developer has completed the majority of the residential home construction for Tract 915-1 but has failed to provide, among other required improvements, the sanitary sewer lift station and conveyance piping (sewer improvements) within the abutting arterial and collector streets to provide sewer service to the development, resulting in the City of Hanford’s Building Department being unable to issue certificates of occupancy.

Currently, there are no residential homes constructed for Tract 915-2. The Developer has only installed underground utilities and a portion of required right-of-way improvements.

On June 12, 2026, the City, in a good faith effort, provided an unsolicited offer to extend the expired Subdivision Improvement Agreements (SIA) for both Tract 915-1 and Tract 915-2 as described in Section §16.24.110 of the Hanford Municipal Code, with amendments to the SIA’s (Amendments) that included a path forward to allow for completion of the developments.

On July 8, 2026, City staff held an in-person meeting at the Developer’s request to discuss the

contents of the Amendments associated with the extension. City staff left this meeting with the understanding that both parties could move forward with mutually agreed-upon modifications to the Amendments. Modifications to the Amendments were made accordingly and mailed via Certified Mail to the Developer for signature on July 21, 2026. Attempts for certified delivery by the United States Postal Service (USPS) were unsuccessful and, ultimately, the documents were returned to City staff after the Developer failed to pick up the parcel at the USPS facility.

On August 3, 2026, a voicemail was received from the Developer with what City staff determined to be unsubstantiated concerns and responded accordingly via email on August 3, 2026. A response from the Developer was subsequently received on August 5, 2026, stating a response to the Agreements would be provided later in the day, however a response was never received.

On August 17, 2026, City staff provided a letter to the Developer by Certified Mail notifying it of the breach of the Subdivision Improvement Agreements for Tract 915-1 and Tract 915-2. After receiving no response from the Developer or a receipt of delivery from USPS and in an effort to keep the Developer informed, City staff emailed the Developer a copy of the letter on August 26, 2026. Again, City staff did not receive a response. The letter is attached for Council's reference.

In addition to the continued efforts to amend and extend the Developer's Agreements, City staff spent additional time and resources determining an alternate route for the sewer system as the initial design required an off-site easement over and across an adjacent parcel not owned by the Developer. This was an attempt to relieve the Developer of the easement acquisition process by providing a less impactful and fast-tracked improvement design for the sewer improvements to be completed on time.

It is imperative that the sewer improvements be completed as other developments in the area are dependent upon these improvements. The alternate sewer improvement plans were accepted for construction by the City on August 20, 2026.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2018-06, and all notices related thereto were prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City of Hanford Municipal Code Policies.

PRIOR COUNCIL ACTION:

City Council approved the Final Maps for Tract 915-1 and Tract 915-2 on July 18, 2023.

PRIOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:

Planning Commission approved Vesting Tentative Tract 915 on June 26, 2018.

Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 2019-20, regarding Amendment #1 to Planned Unit Development No. 2018-01 on September 10, 2019.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The City will retain the right to submit a claim under the Developer’s performance bond and/or pursue any other remedy available under law for potential reimbursement costs incurred for completion of the sewer improvements installed by others.

STRATEGIC GOAL: Indicates which City Strategic Goal(s) this item supports.

Check all that apply.

☐
Quality of
Life
☐
Community
Engagement
☐
Fiscal
Sustainability
☐
Efficient &
High
Performing
Government

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Aerial Maps

2. Resolution 26-64-R

3. Tract 915-1 SIA

4. Final Map-Tract 915-1

5. Tract 915-2 SIA

6. Final Map-Tract 915-2

7. Default Notice-Tract 915-1 and Tract 915-2 -Signed

1 RESOLUTION NO. 26-64-R

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HANFORD,

CALIFORNIA, REGARDING COMPLETION OF SANITARY SEWER

IMPROVEMENTS

At a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford, duly called and held on September 15, 2026, at 7:00 p.m., it was moved by Council Member _________________, and seconded by Council Member ____________________, and duly carried that the following resolution be adopted:

WHEREAS, the City of Hanford (“City”) and Enclave 66, LLC (“Subdivider”) executed Subdivision Agreements (“Subdivision Agreements”) for Tract No. 915 Unit 1 (“Tract 915-1”) and Tract No. 915 Unit 2 (“Tract 915-2”); and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Subdivision Agreements, the Subdivider was to construct subdivision improvements associated with Tract 915-1 and Tract 915-2; and

WHEREAS, the required subdivision improvements include, without limitation, a sanitary sewer lift station and force main (collectively “Sewer Improvements”); and

WHEREAS, the term of each Subdivision Agreement was twenty-four (24) months commencing on July 21, 2023, the date on which the Final Maps for Tract 915-1 and Tract 915-2 were recorded; and

WHEREAS, the Subdivider failed to construct the Sewer Improvements prior to the expiration of the Subdivision Agreements; and

WHEREAS, the Subdivider’s construction of improvements under the Subdivision Agreements is secured by performance bonds; and

WHEREAS, the City attempted to work with the Subdivider to amend the Subdivision Agreements to allow the Subdivider additional time to complete the required subdivision improvements, including the Sewer Improvements, but such efforts were unsuccessful; and

WHEREAS, the Sewer Improvements are required for the development of properties in the vicinity of Tract 915-1 and Tract 915-2, and the delayed construction of the Sewer Improvements impacts the development of those nearby properties; and

WHEREAS, Hanford Municipal Code Section 16.24.110.A. indicates that, if a subdivider fails to complete subdivision improvements within the time specified in a Subdivision Agreement, the City Council, by resolution, may cause any uncompleted improvements to be completed; and

WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it will be in the City’s best interest for the City to cause the completion of the Sewer Improvements so that development of properties in the vicinity of Tract 915-1 and Tract 915-2 may occur.

2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, pursuant to Hanford Municipal Code Section 16.24.110.A., the City Council of the City of Hanford hereby determines that the City will cause the Sewer Improvements to be completed.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Manager and his designees are hereby directed to undertake all necessary and appropriate action to cause the Sewer Improvements to be completed.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Manager and his designees are hereby directed to collect from the Subdivider and/or the Subdivider’s performance bond underwriter the Subdivider’s fair share of construction costs for the Sewer Improvements that are attributable to Tract 915-1 and Tract 915-2.

PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 15th day of September, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES: ________________________________________________________________________ NOES: ________________________________________________________________________ ABSTAIN: ____________________________________________________________________ ABSENT: _____________________________________________________________________

Approved _______________________________

MARK KAIRIS
Mayor
Attest:

________________________

NATALIE CORRAL
City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF KINGS ) ss

CITY OF HANFORD )

I, Natalie Corral, City Clerk of the City of Hanford, do hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford held on the 15th day of September, 2026.

Date:

City Clerk

UTLILITIES & ENGINEERING | 900 SOUTH 10TH AVE. HANFORD, CA 93230 559.585.2500 | WWW.HANFORD.CITY
PAGE | 1 OF 1
Dan Bailey, Manager
Enclave 66, LLC.
5526 W. Sweet Dr.

Visalia, CA. 93291 August 17, 2026

Re: Breach of Subdivision Improvement Agreements- Tract 915-1 and Tract 915-2

Mr. Bailey,

On June 12, 2026, the City of Hanford (City), in a good faith effort provided an unsolicited offer to extend the already expired Subdivision Improvement Agreements (SIA) for both Tract 915-1 and Tract 915-2 as described in Section §16.24.110 of the Hanford Municipal Code, with amendments to the SIA’s (Amendments) that included a path forward to allow for compleƟon of the developments.

On July 8, 2026, City staff held an in-person meeƟng with you at your request to discuss the contents of the Amendments associated with the extension. City staff leŌ this meeƟng with the understanding that both parƟes could move forward with mutually agreed upon modificaƟons to the Amendments.

On July 21, 2026, the City modified the Amendments that were conforming with your requests made at the July 8, 2026 meeƟng, and sent an email copy to you for your review. In that email you were also noƟfied that a hard copy was being mailed to you for your signature and that the signed Amendments were to be submiƩed to the City no later than August 4, 2026, so that the City could maintain an August 18, 2026 City Council meeƟng for the approval of the Amendments. An aƩempt on July 27, 2026, by the United States Postal Service (USPS) to deliver the documents via CerƟfied Mail was unsuccessful as nobody was available to receive the delivery. The USPS has since been holding the documents for your in-person pickup and receipt at their facility.

During the Ɵme following our in-person meeƟng, and with your knowledge, the City, in a good faith effort, has been spending addiƟonal Ɵme reviewing sanitary sewer force main improvement plans for your development.

The plans are being produced by an engineering firm with interest in developing an adjacent subdivision; which is also reliant on the sanitary sewer improvements aƩributed to your development improvement plans. The adjacent development cannot proceed due to the incomplete improvements of Tract 915-1.

On August 3, 2026, City staff received a phone call from you with concerns regarding the sanitary sewer force main plans. City staff found that your concerns were unsubstanƟated and staff responded accordingly via email on August 3, 2026. Again, staff requested you sign and return the Amendments to the City by the August 4, 2026, deadline so staff can move forward with the August 18, 2026 City Council date for approval.

As of the date of this leƩer, beyond the August 4th deadline, the City has not received the signed Amendments.

Therefore, the City deems your company in breach of the Subdivision Improvement Agreements (SIAs) for Tract 915-1 and 915-2 and withdraws the Amendments for Tract 915-1 and Tract 915-2 that were previously mailed to you. The agenda item for the August 18, 2026, City Council date has been removed.

UTLILITIES & ENGINEERING | 900 SOUTH 10TH AVE. HANFORD, CA 93230 559.585.2500 | WWW.HANFORD.CITY
PAGE | 1 OF 2
Since your company failed to Ɵmely complete the li Ō staƟon and force main, a resolu Ɵon will, in accordance with Hanford Municipal Code SecƟon 16.24.110.A., be considered by the Hanford City Council at its September 15, 2026 meeƟng. The City will cause the uncompleted liŌ staƟon and force main to be constructed should the Council adopt the resolu Ɵon. During the public comment por Ɵon of the Council mee Ɵng, you will have an opportunity to address the Council before it considers and acts upon the proposed resoluƟon.

As a path forward, and as a condiƟon of the issuance of a NoƟce of CompleƟon for Tract 915-1 and for Tract 915- 2, the following requirements must be saƟsfied.
 New SIA Amendments will be required for both Tract 915-1 and Tract 915-2, as the construction deadline for the remaining subdivision improvements have lapsed and your company is in breach. The new Amendments will be submitted to you and must be executed and returned by the deadline specified by the City.
 Proportionate share of costs associated with the city’s installation of the sanitary sewer lift station and force main will be enforced and due in full at the time of your execution of the new SIA Amendments.  Your surety company will need to provide documentation to the City confirming that the existing bonds remain in effect with respect to remaining subdivision improvements, which must be completed under the to-be-amended SIA’s, or that they will issue new bonds.  The City will also require you to provide updated insurance documents.

With your company’s failure to complete the required improvements, city staff have determined that creaƟng an avenue for surrounding projects to proceed with their development is a priority. Should the City Council determined that the City will cause the liŌ staƟon and force main to be constructed, the City, will retain the right to submit a claim under your performance bond and/or pursue any other remedy available under law should your company fail to pay its proporƟonate share of construcƟon costs as described above.

The compleƟon of the sanitary sewer improvements by the city will not allow occupancy for Tract 915-1 or Tract 915-2. Occupancy of Tract 915-1 and 915-2 will be withheld u nƟl such Ɵme that new SIA Amendments are executed, your company’s share of costs for the li Ō sta Ɵon and force main are paid in full, all remaining subdivision improvements are completed and accepted by the city, and you have been issued a No Ɵce of CompleƟon.

Sincerely,
Frank Senteno, Director
UƟliƟes and Engineering Division
City of Hanford

12.E.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 9/15/2026 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his or her designee to accept property dedications for public purposes.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his or her designee to accept property dedications for public purposes.

Recommended Motion:

I move to adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his or her designee to accept property dedications for public purposes.

Summary:

From time to time, dedications to the City are necessary as a condition of development or part of a Capital Improvements Project (CIP) and are required for street rights-of-way, easements, or other property interests for public use when necessary for purposes, including, but not limited to, establishing public access rights, accommodating additional travel lanes, and supporting public improvements and utilities. These dedications are sometimes separate and not associated with a parcel or subdivision map process and therefore must be subsequently presented to the City Council as separate instruments for acceptance. The current practice is for the City Council to accept each dedication on a project-by-project basis.

Hanford Municipal Code § 2.08.060. K. allows the City Manager to perform such other duties and exercise such other powers as may be delegated to the City Manager from time to time by ordinance or resolution of the City Council. In addition, Government Code Section 27281 provides that a political corporation or governmental agency may authorize one or more officers or agents to accept and consent to deeds or grants conveying any interest in or easement upon real estate to a political corporation or governmental agency for public purposes. With this authority in mind, staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or his or her designee, to accept dedications (both in fee and easements) for public purposes.

Background:

Government Code Section 66447(a) allows required dedications or offers of dedication via separate instrument. The proposed resolution would eliminate the need for staff to seek separate City Council authorization for dedications by providing the City Manager, or his or her designee, the ability to accept dedications for public use upon final determination by City staff, and acceptance by the City Surveyor, that such dedications are ready for approval. This change would reduce staff time spent preparing staff reports and reduce delays in overall project scheduling and deliverables.

The City Council or Planning Commission, as applicable, will retain approval authority for development projects as currently identified in the City’s Municipal Code. Additionally, dedications on any final map or parcel map will continue to be approved by the City Council in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act.

This procedural change is proposed as an effort to streamline the separate instrument dedication acceptance process within the City of Hanford. The primary objectives are to improve operational efficiency, reduce project turnaround times, and optimize the use of staff time and resources.

While this resolution will allow the City Manager to accept dedications, both in fee and as easements, it will not give the City Manager the authority to accept dedications into the City Street System. In order for the City Manager to accept such dedications into the City Street System, an ordinance (proposed at this same Council meeting) will also need to be adopted.

Environmental Review:

This action is not a project within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines §§ 15378 and 15061(b)(3) as it proposes an organizational structure change that will not result in any direct or indirect physical change in the environment.

Public Notices:

Public notification was achieved by posting the agenda, with the agenda items being listed, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting.

Prior Council Action:

N/A
Prior Planning Commission Action:

N/A
Fiscal Impact:

N/A
STRATEGIC GOAL: Indicates which City Strategic Goal(s) this item supports.

Check all that apply.

☐
Quality of
☐
Community
☐
Fiscal
☐
Efficient &

Life Engagement Sustainability High
Performing
Government

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution 26-65-R

RESOLUTION NO. 26-65-R

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HANFORD,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE CITY MANAGER TO ACCEPT DEDICATIONS

FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES
WHEREAS, pursuing practices that improve efficiency saves the City of Hanford valuable resources; and
WHEREAS, currently the City Council of the City of Hanford accepts dedications for public purposes on a project-by-project basis; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 2.08.060(K) the City Manager may exercise authority delegated by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 27281 allows the City Council to authorize one or more officers or agents to accept and consent to deeds or grants conveying any interest in or easement upon real estate to a political corporation or government agency for public purposes; and WHEREAS, by delegating authority to the City Manager to accept dedications for public purposes, the City Council would improve efficiency, save staff time and have a positive impact on the City’s resources.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Hanford California, as follows:

Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 2. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager or his or her designee to accept dedications for public purposes.

Section 3. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to accept dedications for public purposes as recommended by City Staff.

Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford, duly called and held on September 15, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: ___________________________________________________________________ NOES:___________________________________________________________________ ABSTAIN: _______________________________________________________________ ABSENT: ________________________________________________________________

_______________________

MARK KAIRIS
MAYOR of the City of Hanford

Attest:

NATALIE CORRAL

CITY CLERK

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF KINGS )

CITY OF HANFORD )

I, Natalie Corral, City Clerk of the City of Hanford, do hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford held on the 15th day of September, 2026.

Date:

City Clerk

12.F.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 9/15/2026 AGENDA SECTION: CONSENT CALENDAR

SUBJECT:

Approval of the three-year renewal of Microsoft software licensing through Dell Computer Corporation in the amount of $449,522.40, funded by the IT Services Fund (0415), an internal service fund allocated to all operational departments

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: Approve the three-year renewal of Microsoft software licensing through Dell Computer Corporation in the amount of $449,522.40, funded by the IT Services Fund (0415) an internal service fund allocated to all operational departments

Recommended Motion: I move to approve the three-year renewal of Microsoft software licenses through Dell Computer Corporation in the amount of $449,522.40, funded by the IT Services Fund (0415) an internal service fund allocated to all operational departments BACKGROUND:

Each year, the City pays annual fees for Microsoft volume licensing, software assurance, and subscriptions. These licenses support server operating systems, user access, workstation software, and Microsoft 365 productivity applications. The renewal also includes the EMS G5 Government add- on, which provides enhanced identity management, endpoint protection, and cybersecurity capabilities. The proposed renewal will begin a new three-year licensing term.

Microsoft licensing is essential to the City’s technology infrastructure and supports email, productivity applications, user access, server operations, security updates, and technical support across City departments. Failure to renew the licenses could interrupt access to critical systems and applications and may result in the City operating without the required software licensing.

Dell Computer Corporation provides Microsoft licensing at government pricing through a cooperative purchasing agreement based on Riverside County’s contract. The City’s purchasing procedures allow the use of contracts competitively awarded by other public agencies, commonly referred to as “piggybacking.” This process allows the City to reduce procurement time and obtain favorable pricing and contract terms.

The total cost of the three-year renewal is $449,522.40 payable in annual installments of $149,840.80. The new licensing term will run from October 1, 2026, through September 30, 2029.

FISCAL IMPACT:

This is a budgeted expense within the IT Services Fund an internal service fund. Costs are allocated across all departments with licensed hardware, as reflected in the approved Fiscal Year 2026–2027 Budget. No budget adjustment is required as a result of this action.

STRATEGIC GOAL: Indicates which City Strategic Goal(s) this item supports.

Check all that apply.

☐
Quality of
Life
☐
Community
Engagement
☐
Fiscal
Sustainability
☐
Efficient &
High
Performing
Government

ATTACHMENTS:

1. EA Renewal Quote

2. Microsoft Agreement

3. Dell Marketing L.P. Agreement

Customer: City of Hanford
Contract: Riverside County Master Agreement - PSA-0001524 (8084445) Date of Issue: 9/4/2026 Microsoft EA#: (renewal of 6731416, expires 9/30/2026) Quote Expires: 9/30/2026 Product Description Mfg# Quantity Unit Price Ext. Price Win Server Standard Core ALng SA 2-coreLic 9EM-00270 96 $21.23 $2,038.0 8 Win Remote Desktop Services CAL ALng SA User CAL 6VC-01254 25 $25.9 6 $649.00 Annual Payment Section 1: $2,687.0 8
Product Description Mfg# Quantity Months Unit Price Ext. Price Enterprise Online Services Products
O365 G3 GCC Sub Per User AAA-11894 335 12 $22.5 0 $90,450.00 Core CAL Bridge O365 From SA Sub Per User AAA-12416 200 12 $1.42 $3,408.0 0 Core CAL Bridge O365 Sub Per User AAA-12414 135 12 $1.67 $2,705.4 0 EMS G5 CAO GCC Sub Add-on User CCAL MQW-00003 335 12 $12.2 8 $49,365.60 Additional Online Services Products
Project P3 GCC Sub Per User 7MS-0000
1 3 12 $22.6 8 $816.48
Visio P2 GCC Sub Per User P3U-00001 3 12 $11.3 4 $408.24 Teams Audio Conferencing with Dial Out US/CA GCC Sub Add-on ($0.00) - this is a free SKU that will populate a phone# in your Teams meetings so that people can attend the meeting via dialing a regular phone# instead of having to be on the Teams client. NYH-00001 335 12 $0.00 $0.00 Annual Payment Section 2: $147,153.7
2 Notes: Total Annual Payment Yr 1 $149,840.8 0
Microsoft Enterprise Agreement (EA) Master#: 8084445 Total Annual Payment Yr 2 $149,840.8 0 Microsoft Enterprise Agreement (EA) Enrollment#: Future/TBD Total Annual Payment Yr 3 $149,840.8 0 Total of 3 years of Payments $449,522.4 0
Notes:

Quote prepared by: Chris A Johnson
Section 1- Licenses and Software Assurance
Section 2- Monthly Subscriptions

ProgramSignForm(MSSign)(NA,LatAm)ExBRA,MLI(ENG)(May2020) Page 1 of 2 Document X20-12883

Program Signature Form
MBA/MBSA number

AMD000513255
Agreement number 8084445

Note: Enter the applicable active numbers associated with the documents below. Microsoft requires the associated active number be indicated here, or listed below as new.

For the purposes of this form, “Customer” can mean the signing entity, Enrolled Affiliate, Government Partner, Institution, or other party entering into a volume licensing program agreement.

This signature form and all contract documents identified in the table below are entered into between the Customer and the Microsoft Affiliate signing, as of the effective date identified below.

Contract Document Number or Code
Product Selection Form 3218345.004_PSF
Enterprise Amendment M97 - (90556661)
Enterprise Enrollment (Indirect) X20-10637
By signing below, Customer and the Microsoft Affiliate agree that both parties (1) have received, read and understand the above contract documents, including any websites or documents incorporated by reference and any amendments and (2) agree to be bound by the terms of all such documents.

Customer
Name of Entity (must be legal entity name)* City of Hanford Signature*
Printed First and Last Name*
Printed Title
Signature Date*
Tax ID
* indicates required field
Microsoft Affiliate
Microsoft Corporation
Signature
Printed First and Last Name
Printed Title
Signature Date
(date Microsoft Affiliate countersigns)
Agreement Effective Date
(may be different than Microsoft’s signature date)

ProgramSignForm(MSSign)(NA,LatAm)ExBRA,MLI(ENG)(May2020) Page 2 of 2 Document X20-12883

Optional 2nd Customer signature or Outsourcer signature (if applicable) Customer
Name of Entity (must be legal entity name)*
Signature*
Printed First and Last Name*
Printed Title
Signature Date*
* indicates required field
Outsourcer
Name of Entity (must be legal entity name)*
Signature*
Printed First and Last Name*
Printed Title
Signature Date*
* indicates required field
If Customer requires additional contacts or is reporting multiple previous Enrollments, include th e appropriate form(s) with this signature form.

After this signature form is signed by the Customer, send it and the Contract Documents to Customer’s channel partner or Microsoft account manager, who must submit them to the following address. When the signature form is fully executed by Microsoft, Customer will receive a confirmation copy.

Microsoft Corporation
Dept. 551, Volume Licensing
6880 Sierra Center Parkway
Reno, Nevada 89511
USA

EA20261EnrGov(US)SLG(ENG)(Aug2025) Page 1 of 10
Document X20-10637

Enterprise Enrollment State and Local
Enterprise Enrollment number
(Microsoft to complete) 90556661 Framework ID
(if applicable)
Previous Enrollment number
(Reseller to complete) 6731416

This Enrollment must be attached to a signature form to be valid.

This Microsoft Enterprise Enrollment is entered into between the entities as identified in the signature form as of the effective date. Enrolled Affiliate represents and warrants it is the same Customer, or an Affiliate of the Customer, that entered into the Enterprise Agreement identified on the program signature form.

This Enrollment consists of: (1) these terms and conditions, (2) the terms of the Enterprise Agreement identified on the signature form, (3) the Product Selection Form, (4) the Product Terms, (5) the Microsoft Products and Services Data Protection Addendum, (6) any Supplemental Contact Information Form, Previous Agreement/Enrollment form , and other forms that may be required, and (7) any order submitted under this Enrollment. This Enrollment may only b e entered into under a 2011 or later Enterprise Agreement. By entering into this Enrollment, Enrolled Affiliate agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of the Enterprise Agreement.

All terms used but not defined are located at http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/contracts. In the event of any conflict the terms of this Agreement control.

Effective date. If Enrolled Affiliate is renewing Software Assurance or Subscription Licenses from one or more previous Enrollments or agreements, then the effective date will be the day after the first prior Enrollment or agreement expires or terminates. If this Enrollment is renewed, the effective date of the renewal term will be the day after the Expirat ion Date of the initial term. Otherwise, the effective date will be the date this Enrollment is accepted by Microsoft. Any reference to “anniversary date” refers to the anniversary of the effective date of the applicable initial or renewal term for each year this Enrollment is in effect.

Term. The initial term of th is Enrollment will expire on the last day of the month, 36 full calendar months from the effective date of the initial term . The renewal term will expire 36 full calendar months after the effective date of the renewal term.

Terms and Conditions

1. Definitions.

Terms used but not defined in this Enrollment will have the definition in the Enterprise Agreement. The following definitions are used in this Enrollment:
“Additional Product” means any Product identified as such in the Product Terms and chosen by Enrolled Affiliate under this Enrollment.
“Community” means the community consisting of one or more of the following: (1) a Government, (2) an Enrolled Affiliate u sing eligible Government Community Cloud Services to provide solutions to a Government or a qualified member of the Community, or (3) a Customer with Customer Data that is subject to Government regulations for which Customer determines and Microsoft agrees that the use of Government Community Cloud Services is appropriate to meet Customer’s regulatory requirements.

EA20261EnrGov(US)SLG(ENG)(Aug2025) Page 2 of 10
Document X20-10637

Membership in the Community is ultimately at Microsoft’s discretion, which may vary by Government Community Cloud Service.
“Enterprise Online Service” means any Online Service designated as an Enterprise Online Service in the Product Terms and chosen by Enrolled Affiliate under this Enrollment. Enterprise Online Services are treated as Online Services, except as noted.
“Enterprise Product” means any Desktop Platform Product that Microsoft designates as an Enterprise Product in the Product Terms and chosen by Enrolled Affiliate under this Enrollment. Enterprise Products must be licensed for all Qualified Devices and Qualified Users on an Enterpri se-wide basis under this program.
“Expiration Date” means the date upon which the Enrollment expires. “Federal Agency” means a bureau, office, agency, department or other entity of the United States Government.
“Government” means a Federal Agency, State/Lo cal Entity, or Tribal Entity acting in its governmental capacity.
“Government Community Cloud Services” means Microsoft Online Services that are provisioned in Microsoft’s multi-tenant data centers for exclusive use by or for the Community and offered in a ccordance with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication 800 -145. Microsoft Online Services that are Government Community Cloud Services are designated as such in the Use Rights and Product Terms.
“Industry Device” (also known as line of business device) means any device that: (1) is not useable in its deployed configuration as a general purpose personal computing device (such as a personal computer), a multi-function server, or a commercially viable substitute for one of these systems; and (2) only employs an industry or task-specific software program (e.g. a computer -aided design program used by an architect or a point of sale program) (“Industry Program”). The device may include features and functions derived from Microsoft software or third -party software. If the device performs desktop functions (such as email, word processing, spreadsheets, database, network or Internet browsing, or scheduling, or personal finance), then the desktop functions: (1) may only be used for the purpose of supporting the Industry Program functionality; and (2) must be technically integrated with the Industry Program or employ technically enforced policies or architecture to operate only when used with the Industry Program functionality. “Managed Device” means any device on which any Affiliate in the Enterprise directly or indirectly controls one or more operating system environments. Examples of Managed Devices can be found in the Product Terms.
“Qualified Device” means any device that is used by or for the benefit of Enrolled Affiliate’s Enterprise and is: (1) a personal desktop computer, portable computer, workstation, or similar device capable of running Windows Pro locally (in a physical or virtual operating system environment), or (2) a device used to access a virtual desktop infrastructure (“VDI”). Qualified Devices do not include any device that is: (1) designated as a server and not used as a personal computer, (2) an Industry Device, or (3) not a Managed Device. At its option, the Enrolled Affiliate may designate any device excluded above (e.g., Industry Device) that is used by or for the benefit of the Enrolled Affiliate’s Enterprise as a Qualified Device for all or a subset of Enterprise Products or Online Services the Enrolled Affiliate has selected. “Qualified User” means a person (e.g., employee, consultant, contingent staff) who: (1) is a user of a Qualified Device, or (2) accesses any server software requiring an Enterprise Product Client Access License or any Enterprise Onlin e Service. It does not include a person who accesses server software or an Online Service solely under a License identified in the Qualified User exemptions in the Product Terms. “Reseller” means an entity authorized by Microsoft to resell Licenses under this program and engaged by an Enrolled Affiliate to provide pre- and post-transaction assistance related to this agreement; “Reserved License” means for an Online Service identified as eligible for true -ups in the Product Terms, the License reserved by Enrolled Affiliate prior to use and for which Microsoft will make the Online Se rvice available for activation.

EA20261EnrGov(US)SLG(ENG)(Aug2025) Page 3 of 10
Document X20-10637

"State/Local Entity" means (1) any agency of a state or local government in the United States, or (2) any United States county, borough, commonwealth, city, municipality, town, township, special purpose district, or other similar type of governmental instrumentality established by the laws of Customer’s state and located within Customer’s state’s jurisdiction and geographic boundaries. “Tribal Entity” means a federally recognized tribal entity performing tribal governmental functions and eligible for funding and services from the U.S. Department of Interior by virtue of its status as an Indian tribe.
“Use Rights” means, with respect to any licensing program, the use rights or term s of service for each Product and version published for that licensing program at the Volume Licensing Site and updated from time to time. The Use Rights include the Product -Specific License Terms, the License Model terms, the Universal License Terms, the Data Protection Terms, and the Other Legal Terms. The Use Rights supersede the terms of any end user license agreement (on -screen or otherwise) that accompanies a Product.
“Volume Licensing Site” means http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/contracts or a successor site.

2. Order requirements.
a. Minimum order requirements. Enrolled Affiliate’s Enterprise must have a minimum of 250 Qualified Users or Qualified Devices. The initial order must include at le ast 250 Licenses for Enterprise Products or Enterprise Online Services.
(i) Enterprise commitment. Enrolled Affiliate must order enough Licenses to cover all Qualified Users or Qualified Devices, depending on the License Type, with one or more Enterprise Products or a mix of Enterprise Products and the corresponding Enterprise Online Services (as long as all Qualified Devices not covered by a License are on ly used by users covered with a user License).
(ii) Enterprise Online Services only. If no Enterprise Product is ordered, then Enrolled Affiliate need only maintain at least 250 Subscription Licenses for Enterprise Online Services.
b. Additional Products. Upon s atisfying the minimum order requirements above, Enrolled Affiliate may order Additional Products.
c. Use Rights for Enterprise Products. For Enterprise Products, if a new Product version has more restrictive use rights than the version that is current at the start of the applicable initial or renewal term of the Enrollment, those more restrictive use rights will not apply to Enrolled Affiliate’s use of that Product during that term.
d. Country of usage. Enrolled Affiliate must specify the countries where Licens es will be used on its initial order and on any additional orders.
e. Resellers. Enrolled Affiliate must choose and maintain a Reseller authorized in the United States. Enrolled Affiliate will acquire its Licenses through its chosen Reseller. Orders must be submitted to the Reseller who will transmit the order to Microsoft. The Reseller and Enrolled Affiliate determine pricing and payment terms as between them, and Microsoft will invoice the Reseller based on those terms. Throughout this Agreement the term “price” refers to reference price. Resellers and other third parties do not have authority to bind or impose any obligation or liability on Microsoft.
f. Adding Products.
(i) Adding new Products not previously ordered . New Enterprise Products or Enterprise Online Services may be added at any time by contacting a Microsoft Account Manager or Reseller. New Additional Products, other than Online Services, may be used if an order is placed in the month the Product is first used. For Additional Products that are Online Services, an initial order for the Online Service is required prior to use.

EA20261EnrGov(US)SLG(ENG)(Aug2025) Page 4 of 10
Document X20-10637

(ii) Adding Licenses for previously ordered Products. Additional Licenses for previously ordered Products other than Online Service s may be added at any time but must be included in the next true-up order. Additional Licenses for Online Services must be ordered prior to use, unless the Online Services are (1) identified as eligible for true -up in the Product Terms or (2) included as part of other Licenses. g. True-up requirements. Enrolled Affiliate must submit an annual true -up order that accounts for any changes since the initial order or last order. If there are no changes, then an update statement must be submitted instead of a true-up order. (i) Enterprise Products. For Enterprise Products, Enrolled Affiliate must determine the number of Qualified Devices and Qualified Users (if ordering user -based Licenses) at the time the true-up order is placed and must order additional Licenses for all Qualified Devices and Qualified Users that are not already covered by existing Licenses, including any Enterprise Online Services.
(ii) Additional Products. For Additional Products that have been previously ordered under this Enrollment , Enrolled Affilia te must determine the maximum number of Additional Products used since the latter of the initial order, the last true -up order, or the prior anniversary date and submit a true-up order that accounts for any increase. (iii) Online Services. For Online Services i dentified as eligible for true -up in the Product Terms, Enrolled Affiliate may place a reservation order for the additional Licenses prior to use and payment may be deferred until the next true -up order. Microsoft will provide a report of Reserved License s ordered but not yet invoiced to Enrolled Affiliate and its Reseller. Reserved Licenses will be invoiced retrospectively to the month in which they were ordered.
(iv) Subscription License reductions. Enrolled Affiliate may reduce the quantity of Subscription Licenses at the Enrollment anniversary date on a prospective basis if permitted in the Product Terms, as follows:
1) For Subscription Licenses that are part of an Enterprise-wide purchase, Licenses may be reduced as long as (a) the initial order minimum requirements are maintained and (b) the total quantity of Licenses and Software Assurance for an applicable group meets or exceeds the quantity of Qualified Devices and Qualified Users (if ordering user-based Licenses) identified on the Product Sel ection Form, and includes any additional Qualified Devices and Qualified Users added in any prior true -up orders.

Step-up Licenses do not count towards this total count. 2) For Enterprise Online Services in a given Product pool that are not a part of an Enterprise-wide purchase, Licenses can be reduced as long as (a) the initial order minimum requirements are maintained and (b) all then -active users of each Online Service are included the total quantity of Licenses remaining after the reduction. An Enrolled Affiliate may reduce Licenses for Online Services on or before the Enrollment anniversary date and place a reservation order for such licenses within 90 days after the anniversary date; however, any licenses ordered as described in this section will be invo iced to the Enrolled Affiliate for the time period the licenses were made available. Subscription Licenses ordered upfront may not be reduced. 3) For Additional Products available as Subscription Licenses, Enrolled Affiliate may reduce the Licenses. If the L icense count is reduced to zero, then Enrolled Affiliate’s use of the applicable Subscription License will be cancelled.

Invoices will be adjusted to reflect any reductions in Subscription Licenses at the true -up order Enrollment anniversary date and effective as of such date. (v) Update statement. An update statement must be submitted instead of a true -up order if, since the initial order or last true -up order, Enrolled Affiliate’s Enterprise: (1) has not changed the number of Qualified Devices and Quali fied Users licensed with Enterprise Products or Enterprise Online Services; and (2) has not increased its usage of Additional

EA20261EnrGov(US)SLG(ENG)(Aug2025) Page 5 of 10
Document X20-10637

Products. This update statement must be signed by Enrolled Affiliat e’s authorized representative.
(vi) True-up order period. The true -up order or update statement must be received by Microsoft between 60 and 30 days prior to each Enrollment anniversary date. The last true-up order or update statement during an Enrollment term is due within 30 days prior to the Expiration Date, and any license reservations within this 30 -day period will not be accepted. Enrolled Affiliate may submit true-up orders more often to account for increases in Product usage, but an annual true-up order or update statement must still be submitted during the annual order period.
(vii) Late true-up order. If the true -up order or update statement is not received when due , Microsoft may invoice Reseller for all Reserved L icenses not previously invoiced and Subscription License reductions cannot be reported until the following Enrollment anniversary date (or at Enrollment renewal, as applicable). h. Step-up Licenses. For Licenses eligible for a step-up under this Enrollment, Enrolled Affiliate may step-up to a higher edition or suite as follows:
(i) For step-up Licenses included on an initial order, Enrolled Affiliate may order according to the true-up process.
(ii) If step -up Licenses are not included on an initial order, Enrolled Affiliate may step -up initially by following the process described in the Section title d “Adding new Products not previously ordered,” then for additional step -up Licenses, by following the true -up order process.
i. Clerical errors. Microsoft may correct clerical errors in this Enrollment, and any documents submitted with or under this Enrollm ent, by providing notice by email and a reasonable opportunity for Enrolled Affiliate to object to the correction. Clerical errors include minor mistakes, unintentional additions and omissions. This provision does not apply to material terms, such as the identity, quantity or price of a Product ordered. j. Verifying compliance. Microsoft may, in its discretion and at its expense, verify compliance with this Enrollment as set forth in the Enterprise Agreement.

3. Pricing.
a. Price Levels. For both the initial and any renewal term Enrolled Affiliate’s Price Level for all Products ordered under this Enrollment will be Level “D” throughout the term of the Enrollment. b. Setting Prices. Unless otherwise expressly agreed to by the parties and except for Online Services d esignated in the Product Terms as being exempt from fixed pricing, Enrolled Affiliate’s prices for each Product or Service will be established by its Reseller. As long as Enrolled Affiliate continues to qualify for the same price level, Microsoft’s prices for Resellers for each Product or Service ordered will be fixed throughout the applicable initial or renewal Enrollment term. Microsoft’s prices to Resellers are reestablished at the beginning of the renewal term.

4. Payment terms.

For the initial or renewal order, Microsoft will invoice Enrolled Affiliate’s Reseller in three equal annual installments. The first installment will be invoiced upon Microsoft’s acceptance of this Enrollment and remaining installments will be invoiced on each subsequent Enrollment anniversary date. Subsequent orders are invoiced upon acceptance of the order and Enrolled Affiliate may elect to pay annually or upfront for Online Services and upfront for all other Licenses.

EA20261EnrGov(US)SLG(ENG)(Aug2025) Page 6 of 10
Document X20-10637

5. End of Enrollment term and termination.
a. General. At the Expiration Date, Enrolled Affiliate must immediately order and pay for Licenses for Products it has used but has not previously submitted an order, except as otherwis e provided in this Enrollment.
b. Renewal option. At the Expir ation Date of the initial term, Enrolled Affiliate may request to renew Products and Services under this Enrollment for one additional 36 -month term.

Microsoft may make changes to this program that will make it necessary for Customer and its Enrolled Affiliates to enter into new agreements or Enrollments in order to renew. In order for a renewal request to be considered, Microsoft must receive a Renewal Form, Product Selection Form, and renewal request prior to or at the Expiration Date. Microsoft will re view a renewal request made under this section in good faith and may accept or reject such request in its sole discretion.
c. If Enrolled Affiliate elects not to renew.
(i) Software Assurance. If Enrolled Affiliate elects not to renew Software Assurance for any Product under its Enrollment, then Enrolled Affiliate will not be permitted to order Software Assurance later without first acquiring a new License with Software Assurance. (ii) Online Services eligible for an Extended Term. For Online Services identified as eligible for an Extended Term in the Product Terms, the following options are available at the end of the Enrollment initial or renewal term.
1) Extended Term. Licenses for Online Services will automatically expire in accordance with the terms of the Enrollment. An extended term option that allows Online Services to continue month -to-month (“Extended Term”) is available. During the Extended Term, Online Services will be invoiced monthly at the then -current published price as of the Expiration Date plus a 3% administrative fee for up to one year . If Enrolled Affiliate wants an Extended Term, Enrolled Affiliate must submit a request to Microsoft at least 30 days prior to the Expiration Date.
2) Cancellation during Extended Term. At any time during the first twelv e months of the Extended Term, Enrolled Affiliate may terminate the Extended Term by submitting a notice of cancellation to Microsoft for each Online Service. Thereafter, Microsoft may condition the continued use of each Online Service on the acceptance of new terms by the Enrolled Affiliate. Enrolled Affiliate will be notified in writing of any new terms at least 60 days before any such changes take effect. Enrolled Affiliate acknowledges and agrees that after the notice described in this section , its cont inued use of each Online Service after the effective date provided in the notice will constitute its acceptance of the new terms. If Enrolled Affiliate does not agree to the new terms, it must stop using the Online Services and terminate the Extended Term as provided in this section. Enrolled Affiliate’s termination under this section will be effective at the end of the month following 30 days after Microsoft has received the notice. (iii) Subscription Licenses and Online Services not eligible for an Extended Ter m. If Enrolled Affiliate elects not to renew, the Licenses will be cancelled and will terminate as of the Expiration Date. Any associated media must be uninstalled and destroyed and Enrolled Affiliate’s Enterprise must discontinue use. Microsoft may requ est written certification to verify compliance.
d. Termination for cause. Any termination for cause of this Enrollment will be subject to the “Termination for cause” section of the Agreement. In addition, it shall be a breach of this Enrollment if Enrolled Affiliate or any Affiliate in the Enterprise that uses Government Community Cloud Services fails to meet and maintain the conditions of membership in the definition of Community.
e. Early termination. Any early termination of this Enrollment will be subject to the “Early Termination” Section of the Enterprise Agreement.

EA20261EnrGov(US)SLG(ENG)(Aug2025) Page 7 of 10
Document X20-10637

For Subscription Licenses, in the event of a breach by Microsoft, or if Microsoft terminates an Online Service for regulatory reasons, Microsoft will issue Reseller a credit for any amount paid in advance for the period after termination.

6. Government Community Cloud.
a. Community requirements. If Enrolled Affiliate purchases Government Community Cloud Services, Enrolled Affiliate certifies that it is a member of the Community and agrees to use Government Community Cloud Services solely in its capacity as a member of the Community and, for eligible Government Community Cloud Services, for the benefit of end users that are members of the Community. Use of Government Community Cloud Services by an entity that is not a member of the Community or to provide services to non-Community members is strictly prohibited and could result in termination of Enrolled Affiliate’s license(s) for Government Community Cloud Services without notice. Enrolled Affiliate acknowledges that only Community members may use Government Community Cloud Services. b. All terms and conditions applicable to non-Government Community Cloud Services also apply to their corresponding Government Community Cloud Services, except as otherwise noted in the Use Rights, Product Terms, and this Enrollment.
c. Enrolled Affiliate may not deploy or use Government Community Cloud Services and corresponding non-Government Community Cloud Services in the same domain. d. Use Rights for Government Community Cloud Services. For Government Community Cloud Services, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Use Rights:
(i) Government Community Cloud Services will be offered only within the United States. (ii) Additional European Terms, as set forth in the Use Rights, will not apply. (iii) References to geographic areas in the Use Rights with respect to the location of Customer Data at rest, as set forth in the Use Rights, refer only to the United States.

EA20261EnrGov(US)SLG(ENG)(Aug2025) Page 8 of 10
Document X20-10637

Enrollment Details

1. Enrolled Affiliate’s Enterprise.

Make an election for including Affiliates in the Enterprise (Required).

Check only one box in this section. If no boxes are checked, Microsoft will deem the Enterprise to include the Enrolled Affiliate only. If more than one box is checked, Microsoft will deem the Enterprise to include the largest number of Affiliates:
 Enrolled Affiliate only.
 All Affiliates. All Affiliates of Enrolled Affiliate are hereby included in the Enterprise. Enrolled Affiliate represents that its Affiliates are entire offices, bureaus, agencies, departments, or other entities, not partial offices, bureaus, agencies, or departments, or other partial entities . Enrolled Affiliate may order Products for use by its Affiliates. If it does, the licenses granted to Enrolled Affiliate under this Enrollment will apply to such Affiliates, but Enrolled Affiliate will have the sole right to enforce the Agreement and this Enrollment against Microsoft. Enrolled Affiliate will remain responsible for all obligations under this Enrollment and for its Affiliates’ compliance with this Enrollment.
 Enrolled Affiliate including. Only the Enrolled Affiliate and the Affiliates listed below will be included in the Enterprise. Enrolled Affiliate represents that its Affiliates are entire offices, bureaus, agencies, departments, or other entities , not partial offices, bureaus , agencies, or departments, or other partial entities. Enrolled Affiliate may order Products for use by its Affiliates. If it does, the licenses granted to Enrolled Affiliate under this Enrollment will apply to such Affiliates, but Enrolled Affiliate will have the sole right to enforce the Agreement and this Enrollment against Microsoft. Enrolled Affiliate will remain responsible for all obligations under this Enrollment and for its Affiliates’ compliance with this Enrollment.

The following Affiliates are included in the Enterprise:

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Agreement, the parties acknowledge and agree to the following:

Products ordered under this Enrollment may be subject to U.S. and other countries’ export jurisdictions.

Each party will comply with all laws a nd regulations applicable to the import or export of the Products, including, without limitation, trade laws of the U.S., EU, and UK, such as the U.S. Export Administration Regulations, sanctions regulations administered by the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control, the EU Dual Use Regulation 2021/821, and/or other end -user, end use, and destination restrictions (“Trade Laws”) .

Customer will not, and will ensure its Affiliates will not, take any action that causes Microsoft to violate applicable Trade Laws. Microsoft may suspend or terminate this Enrollment immediately without notice to the extent that Microsoft reasonably believes that performance would cause it to violate Trade Laws or put it at risk of becoming subject to sanctions and penalties under s uch laws. Customer remains responsible for its and for its Affiliates’ compliance with this section and, to the extent applicable, a Regional Trade Compliance Supplemental Terms incorporated herein by reference.

2. Contact information.

Each party will notify the other in writing if any of the information in the following contact information page(s) changes. The asterisks (*) indicate required fields. By providing contact information, Enrolled Affiliate consents to its use for purposes of administering this Enrollment by Microsoft, its Affiliates, and other parties that help administer this Enrollment. The personal information provided in connection with this Enrollment will be used and protected in accordance with the privacy statement available at https://privacy.microsoft.com/privacystatement.
a. Primary contact. This contact is the primary contact for the Enrollment from within Enrolled Affiliate’s Enterprise. This contact may also be an Online Administrator for Volume Licensing

EA20261EnrGov(US)SLG(ENG)(Aug2025) Page 9 of 10
Document X20-10637

in the Microsoft 365 Admin Center (MAC) and may grant online access to others. The primary contact will be the default contact for all purposes unless separate contacts are identified for specific purposes
Name of entity (must be legal entity name)* City of Hanford Contact name: First* Eric Middle Last* Forcey
Contact email address* [email protected]
Street address* 315 North Douty Street
City* Hanford
State* CA
Postal code* 93230-3951-
(Please provide the zip + 4, e.g. xxxxx-xxxx)
Country* United States
Phone* 5595854746
Tax ID
Work or School (WSA) Account ID [email protected]
* indicates required fields
b. Notices contact and Online Administrator. This contact (1) receives the contractual notices, (2) is the Online Administrator for Volume Licensing in the Microsoft 365 Admin Center (MAC)and may grant online access to others, and (3) is authorized to order Reserved Licenses for eligible Online Servies, including adding or reassigning Licenses and stepping-up prior to a true-up order.
 Same as primary contact (default if no information is provided below, even if the box is not checked).

Contact name: First* Manuel Middle Last* Azevedo
Contact email address* [email protected]
Street address* 315 North Douty Street
City* Hanford
State* CA
Postal code* 93230-3951-
(Please provide the zip + 4, e.g. xxxxx-xxxx)
Country* United States
Phone* 5595852500
Work or School (WSA) Account ID [email protected]
Language preference. Choose the language for notices. English  This contact is a third party (not the Enrolled Affiliate). Warning: This contact receives personally identifiable information of the Customer and its Affiliates. * indicates required fields
c. Online Services Manager. This contact is authorized to manage the Online Services ordered under the Enrollment and (for applicable Online Services) to add or reassign Licenses and step-up prior to a true-up order.

Same as notices contact and Online Administrator (default if no information is provided below, even if box is not checked)
Contact name: First* Manuel Middle Last* Azevedo
Contact email address* [email protected]
Phone* 5595852500
Work or School (WSA) Account ID [email protected]
 This contact is from a third party organization (not the entity). Warning: This contact receives personally identifiable information of the entity.
* indicates required fields

EA20261EnrGov(US)SLG(ENG)(Aug2025) Page 10 of 10
Document X20-10637

d. Reseller information. Reseller contact for this Enrollment is:

Reseller company name* Dell Inc.

Street address (PO boxes will not be accepted)* One Dell Way City* RoundRock
State* TX
Postal code* 78682
Country* United States
Contact name* Microsoft LicensingAdministrator
Phone* 512-724-2149
Contact email address* [email protected]
* indicates required fields
By signing below, the Reseller identified above confirms that all information provided in this Enrollment is correct.

Signature*
Printed name*
Printed title*
Date*
* indicates required fields
Changing a Reseller. If Microsoft or the Reseller chooses to discontinue doing business with each other, Enrolled Affiliate must choose a replacement Reseller. If Enrolled Affiliate or the Reseller intends to terminate their relationship, the initiating party must notify Microsoft and the other party using a form provided by Microsoft at least 90 days prior to the date on which the change is to take effect.
e. If Enrolled Affiliate requires a separate contact for any of the following, attach the Supplemental Contact Information form. Otherwise, the notices contact and Online Administrator remains the default.
(i) Additional notices contact
(ii) Software Assurance manager
(iii) Subscriptions manager
(iv) Customer Support Manager (CSM) contact

3. Financing elections.

Is a purchase under this Enrollment being financed through MS Financing?  Yes,  No.

If a purchase under this Enrollment is financed through MS Financing, and Enrolled Affiliate chooses not to finance any associated taxes, it must pay these taxes directly to Microsoft.

Sandy Delaney
Senior Analyst
09/09/2026

Enterprise Enrollment Product Selection Form Microsoft | Volume Licensing Language:

Qualified Devices Qualified Users
335 335
Price Level
Enterprise Products and Enterprise Online Services USLs: Unless otherwise indicated in associated contract documents, Price level set using the highest quantity from Groups 1 through 4. D Additional Product Application Pool: Unless otherwise indicated in associated contract documents, Price level set using quantity from Group 1. D
Enrolled Affiliate’s Enterprise Products and Enterprise Online Services summary for the initial order:
0 0
English (United States)
Profile
Enterprise User Licenses
CAL Licensing ModelDevice / User Ratio

1.0 135
335
Office 365 Plans
Client Access License (CAL)
Enterprise Mobility and Security (EMS)
Enrolled Affiliate’s Product Quantities:

Proposal ID
3218345.004
Enrollment Number
Enterprise Quantity
Quantity
Enrolled Affiliate’s Price Level:

Additional Product Server Pool: Unless otherwise indicated in associated contract documents, Price level set using the highest quantity from Group 2 or 3. D
Additional Product Systems Pool: Unless otherwise indicated in associated contract documents, Price level set using quantity from Group 4. D
O365 G3 GCC
Bridge for Office 365
Enterprise Mobility and Security G5 Cloud Add On GOV
335
Price Group 1 2
Products
3 4
Enterprise Products Office Professional Plus + M365 Apps for Enterprise + Office 365 (Plans E3
and E5) + Microsoft 365 Enterprise
Client Access License
+ Office 365 (Plans E1,
E3 and E5) + Microsoft
365 Enterprise
Client Access License
+ Windows Intune +
EMS USL + Microsoft
365 Enterprise
Win E3 + Win E5 +
Win VDA + Microsoft
365 Enterprise
335
Core CAL
Core CAL Bridge O365 FSA Renewal 200
335
Product Offering / Pool
EA-EASProdSelForm(WW)(ENG)

MS Quote

Enterprise Enrollment Product Selection Form Microsoft | Volume Licensing Note 4: Unless otherwise indicated in associated Agreement documents, the CAL selection must be the same across the Enterprise for each Profile.

Note 5: If Enrolled Affiliate does not order an Enterprise Product or Enterprise Online Service associated with an applicable Product pool, the price level for Additional Products in the same pool will be price level “A” throughout the term of the Enrollment. Refer to the Qualifying Government Entity Addendum pricing provision for more details on price leveling.

Note 6: Bridge CAL, Office 365 Plan E3 Add Ons, EMS Add Ons, Windows Ent SA Per User Add Ons, and Enterprise Cloud Suite Add On quantities are not included for Price Leveling, as License quantities are determined by the corresponding Enterprise Online Service(s).

Notes
Unless otherwise indicated in the associated contract documents, the price level for each Product offering / pool is set as described above, based upon the quantity to price level mapping below:

Quantity of Licenses and Software Assurance Price Level Note 2: Enterprise Online Services may not be available in all locations.  Please see the Product List for a list of locations where these may be purchased.

Note 3: Unless otherwise indicated in the associated Agreement documents, the CAL selection must be the same across the Enterprise for each Profile. 2,399 and below A
Note 1: In the following countries, any direct Enrollment consisting of only Enterprise Online Services will not be eligible for the Renewal option described in Section 5.b. of the Enrollment or for a new Enrollment due to program changes: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Cyprus, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Jamaica, Italy, Lichtenstein, Luxemburg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Puerto Rico, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Trinidad & Tobago, United Kingdom, United States, and Uruguay. 2,400 to 5,999 B
6,000 to 14,999 C
15,000 and above D
EA-EASProdSelForm(WW)(ENG)

MS Quote

VL Central Amendments

M97 Lime

Amendment to Contract Documents
Enrollment Number

AMD000513255

This amendment (“Amendment”) is entered into between the parties identified on the attached program signature form. It amends the Enrollment or Agreement identified above. All terms used but not defined in this Amendment will have the same meanings provided in that Enrollment or Agreement.

Enterprise Enrollment
Invoice for Quoted Price
Amendment ID M97
The price quoted to Enrolled Affiliate is a fixed price based on an estimated order submission date.

Microsoft will invoice Enrolled Affiliate based on this fixed price quote. If this order is submitted later than the estimated order submission date, Enrolled Affiliate will be char ged for net new Monthly Subscriptions (including Online Services) for the period during which these services were not provided.

For Indirect models, Pricing to Enrolled Affiliate is agreed between Enrolled Affiliate and Enrolled Affiliate’s Reseller.

SKU Number SKU Description Existing Quantity Incremental quantities
MQW-00003 EMS G5 CAO GCC Sub
Add-on User CCAL 335 0
AAA-11894 O365 G3 GCC Sub Per
User 335 0
7MS-00001 Planner & Project P3
GCC Sub Per User 3 0
NYH-00001 Teams AC with Dial Out
US/CA GCC Sub Add-on 335 0
P3U-00001 Visio P2 GCC Sub Per
User 3 0
AAA-12416 CCAL Bridge O365 FSA
Renewal Sub Per User 200 0
AAA-12414 CCAL Bridge O365 Sub
Per User 135 0

Except for changes made by this Amendment, the Enrollment or Agreement identified above remains unchanged and in full force and effect. If there is any conflict between any provision in this Amendment and any provision in the Enrollment or Agreement identified above, this Amendment shall control.

Microsoft Internal Use Only:
"(M97)EnrAmend(Ind)(InvoiceforQuotedPrice)
(WW)(ENG)(Dec2025)(IU).docx"
M97 Lime
This Amendment must be attached to a signature form to be valid.

VL Central Amendments

M97 Lime

PrevEnrAgrForm(WW)(ENG)(Oct2019) Page 1 of 1
Document X20-12873

Previous Enrollment(s)/Agreement(s) Form
Entity Name: City of Hanford
Contract that this form is attached to: State Local Government For the purposes of this form, “ entity” can mean the signing entity, Customer, Enrolled Affiliate, Government Partner, Institution, or other party entering into a volume licensing program agreement.

Please provide a description of the previous Enrollment(s), Agreement(s) , Purchasing Account(s), and/or Affiliate Registration(s) being renewed or consolidated into the new contract identified above. a. Entity may select below any previous contract(s) from which to transfer MSDN subscribers to this new contract. Entity shall ensure that each MSDN subscriber transferred is either properly licensed under the new contract or is removed. b. Entity may select below only on e previous contract from which to transfer the Software Assurance (SA) Benefit contact details, i.e., benefits contact (not the SA manager) and the program codes, to this new contract.
c. An Open License cannot be used to transfer either the SA Benefit detail s or MSDN subscribers.
d. The date of the earliest expiring Enrollment/Agreement that contains SA or Online Services will be the effective date of the new contract (or SA coverage period for Select Plus). e. Please insert the number of the earliest expiring Enro llment/Agreement with SA or Online Services in the appropriate fields of the new contract.

Enrollment/Agreement/
Purchasing Account/Affiliate
Registration Description
Enrollment/Agreement/
Purchasing Account/Affiliate
Registration Public Customer
Number
Transfer
SA Benefit
Contact
Transfer
MSDN
Subscribers
Standard Enrollment 6731416

13.A.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 9/15/2026 AGENDA SECTION: PUBLIC HEARING

SUBJECT:

Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Consolidated Annual Performance Report (CAPER) PY25-26

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation:

Open the public hearing and accept comments regarding the Program Year 2025 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) and adopt Resolution No. 26-55-R authorizing and approving the Program Year 2025 CAPER.

Recommended Motion:

I move to adopt Resolution No. 26-55-R approving the Program Year 2025 Community Development Block Grant Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) and authorizing its submission to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

BACKGROUND:

The Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) is required of all jurisdictions that receive Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) entitlement funds from the U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This report outlines the City’s progress in implementing activities funded through the CDBG Program during Program Year (PY) 2025, which spans from July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026. During this period, the City expended approximately $961,071 in eligible CDBG funds across all open grant years. The report also highlights accomplishments, program outcomes, and progress toward meeting the goals and objectives identified in the City’s Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan.

REPORT COMPONENTS:

The CAPER includes the following key components:

1. Narrative Summary

This section details the activities carried out during Program Year 2025, from July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026. It evaluates the activities’ alignment with the objectives and priorities established in the City’s Annual Action Plan and five-year Consolidated Plan.

2. Summary of Specific Annual Goals and Objectives
This section provides a breakdown of each program activity, including budgeted amounts, expenditures, and program outcomes.

3. Financial Summary
This section summarizes the financial performance of the CDBG Program for the City of Hanford for the program year. The CAPER incorporates financial and performance information maintained in HUD’s Integrated Disbursement and Information System (IDIS), along with narrative information prepared by City staff.

Throughout the program year, City staff entered data into IDIS to monitor expenditures and track progress toward program goals. HUD requires all CDBG entitlement communities to annually assess and publicly report on their performance in implementing the Annual Action Plan. In accordance with HUD regulations and the City’s Citizen Participation Plan, staff facilitated public engagement by publishing a bilingual public notice announcing both the public review and comment period and the public hearing.Draft copies of the proposed CAPER were made available for public review and comment from September 1 through September 16, 2026. The City Council public hearing is scheduled for September 15, 2026. Written comments will continue to be accepted through the close of the public comment period on September 16, 2026.

As of the preparation of this staff report, no public comments have been received. Any comments received through the close of the public comment period will be incorporated into the final CAPER, as applicable.

The final CAPER must be submitted to HUD by September 30, 2026, which is 90 days after the end of the program year on June 30, 2026.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Submitting the CAPER in compliance with HUD requirements helps ensure that the City remains eligible to receive future CDBG entitlement funding. There is no direct fiscal impact associated with the approval and submission of this report.

STRATEGIC GOAL: Indicates which City Strategic Goal(s) this item supports.

Check all that apply.

☐
Quality of
☐
Community
☐
Fiscal
☐
Efficient &

Life Engagement Sustainability High
Performing
Government

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Exhibit A- PY25 CDBG CAPER

2. Resolution 26-55-R

1 EXHIBIT A

PROGRAM YEAR 2025/26

CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND

EVALUATION REPORT (CAPER)

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 3
CR-05 - GOALS AND OUTCOMES 4
CR-10 – RACIAL AND ETHNIC 12
CR-15 - RESOURCES AND INVESTMENTS 91.520(A) 13
CR-20 - AFFORDABLE HOUSING 91.520(B) 16
CR-25 - HOMELESS AND OTHER SPECIAL NEEDS 91.220(D, E); 91.320(D, E); 91.520(C) 18 CR-30 - PUBLIC HOUSING 91.220(H); 91.320(J) 21
CR-35 - OTHER ACTIONS 91.220(J)-(K); 91.320(I)-(J) 22 CR-40 - MONITORING 91.220 AND 91.230 27
CR-45 - CDBG 91.520(C) 28
ATTACHMENTS 29

3 Introduction

The Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) for the City of Hanford covers the period from July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026.

The City's Five-Year Consolidated Plan outlines housing, homelessness, community, and economic development needs and resources . This plan creates a Strategic Plan to meet those needs. The Strategic Plan has three parts: a needs assessment, housing market analysis, and long -term strategies to address priority needs. The Annual Action Plan describes the projects and activities the City will undertake in the coming year using its CDBG funds. The Action Plan also includes certifications that the City will meet requirements, such as furthering fair housing.

The CAPER assesses the City's performance for all HUD formula grant programs, specifically the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG).

It evaluates whether the City has met the objectives and goals established in the Five -Year Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan. PY 2025–2026 is the second year of the City's five -year Consolidated Plan (Program Years 2024–2028).

4 CR-05 - Goals and Outcomes

Progress has been made in the jurisdiction's strategic plan and action plan. 91.520(a)

This section addresses activities undertaken during the program year to meet pertinent 2024 – 2028 Consolidated Plan and FY 2025/26 Annual Action Plan objectives and high-priority areas.

To meet the City of Hanford’s goals and objectives for FY 2025/26, CDBG funds were primarily administered to the following activities:
• Planning and Administration
• Kings/Tulare Homeless Alliance – Continuum of Care, Point-in-Time Count, and LINC services
• Kings Commission on Aging – Public services
• Fair Housing – Fair housing services and education
• Kings Community Action Organization – Overnight shelter services • City of Hanford Emergency/Minor Home Repair Program – Affordable housing assistance • Kings Community Action Organization Food Bank Service Center – Public facility improvements
• City of Hanford Parks and Community Services – Community Recreation Program – Recreational programs and services for youth and seniors

These activities supported affordable housing, public services, homelessness services, fair housing, public facility improvements, and recreational opportunities for low- and moderate-income Hanford residents.

Programs designed to address the priority needs identified in the City’s 2024 –2028 Consolidated Plan continue to guide the use of CDBG funds. In keeping with this focus, the following Consolidated Plan goals were addressed during the program year:
• Goal 1 – Housing: Increase and preserve affordable housing opportunities, including housing rehabilitation and home improvement assistance.
• Goal 2 – Program Administration: Support the administration and oversight of the City’s CDBG program and community development activities.
• Goal 3 – Public Services: Support public service activities benefiting low - and moderate - income residents, including homeless services, senior services, youth services, and other community services.
• Goal 4 – Community Development/Enhancement: Support neighborhood preservation, public facilities, infrastructure, and other community development improvements.

The accomplishments reported for the program year represent the City of Hanford’s progress toward meeting the goals established in its 2024 –2028 Consolidated Plan and FY 2025/26 Annual Action Plan. The applicable CAPER tables and IDIS report further detail actual accomplishments and program outcomes.

5 Assess how the jurisdiction’s use of funds, particularly CDBG, aligns with the priorities and specific objectives identified in the plan, with special attention to the highest-priority activities.

As an entitlement grantee for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) formula CDBG program, the City of Hanford must prepare a CAPER to analyze and summarize program accomplishments of the preceding program year.

The CAPER reports on progress toward the overall five-year Consolidated Plan goals and priorities (July 1, 2024 –June 30, 2028). It identifies areas for improvement resulting from annual self - evaluations and HUD performance reviews.

The City of Hanford was consistent with its goal of providing housing opportunities for Hanford’s low- to moderate-income families and preserving the existing housing stock.

The City remains committed to providing a full range of housing opportunities throughout the community and intends to support the development of housing opportunities in the town. As such, the City will implement programs to improve the supply of lower-income housing further. Below are the programmed activities for PY 2025, along with the accomplishments associated with each activity.

During the second year of the five -year Consolidated Plan, the City of Hanford continued its commitment to providing housing opportunities for low - and moderate -income households while preserving the existing housing stock.

6 Comparison of the proposed versus actual outcomes for each outcome measure submitted with the consolidated plan and explain, if applicable, why progress was not made toward meeting goals and objectives. 91.520(g)
Categories, priority levels, funding sources and amounts, outcomes/objectives, goal outcome indicators, units of measure, targets, actual outcomes/outputs, and percentage completed for each of the grantee’s program year goals.

Goal Category Source /
Amount Indicator Unit of
Measure
Expected –
Strategic
Plan
Actual –
Strategic
Plan
Percent
Complete
Expected –
Program
Year
Actual –
Program
Year
Percent
Complete
Community
Development/
Enhancement
Public
Improvements
Food Service
Center
Homeless CDBG:
$200,000
Public Facility or
Infrastructure Activities
other than Low/Moderate
Income Housing Benefit
Persons
Assisted 1 0 0% 1 0 0%
Housing Affordable
Housing
CDBG:
$293,975
Homeowner Housing
Rehabilitated
Househol
d
Housing
Unit
50 39 78% 14 24 171%
Program
Administration
Program
Administratio
n
CDBG:
$155,374 Other Other 0 0 0 0 0 0
Public Services
Non-Housing
Community
Development
CDBG:
$45,000
Public service activities
other than Low/Moderate
Income Housing Benefit
Persons
Assisted 743 311 42% 140 171 122%
Public Services
Non-Housing
Community
Development
CDBG:
$10,000
Public service activities
for Low/Moderate Income
Housing Benefit
Househol
ds
Assisted
15000 955 6% 300 418 140%
Public Services
Non-Housing
Community
Development
CDBG:
$20,040 Homelessness Prevention Persons
Assisted 1250 370 30% 35 67 191%
Public Services
Non-Housing
Community
Development
CDBG:
$15,000
$13,000
Other- Youth Recreation
Program
Fair Housing
Persons
Assisted
Persons
Assisted
7 0
20 0
286%

0 13
35 40
46 154%

132%
Table 1- Accomplishments – Program Year & Strategic Plan to Date

Note: This table is a working Word version and is not the final IDIS -generated table. Accomplishment reporting and activity closeout in IDIS are still in progress. The final figures and percentages may change once all information has been entered and IDIS generates the final table.

7 ➢ Housing Rehabilitation-Emergency Repair Program:

During PY 2025 –2026, the City of Hanford administered the Emergency Repair Program (ERP) to provide grant assistance to low - and moderate -income homeowners for urgent repairs that addressed immediate health and safety hazards. During the reporting period, the City completed repairs for 24 households.
• Structural roof replacements to prevent water intrusion and environmental deterioration • Complete HVAC system replacements to ensure proper climate control and air quality • Comprehensive plumbing repairs to restore sanitary, functional water systems • Targeted lead -based paint remediation across two homes to eliminate environmental hazards

Through these housing preservation activities, the City addressed significant code, health, and safety deficiencies and helped ensure that assisted residents had secure, code -compliant, and habitable housing.

➢ Fair Housing Education and Outreach Activity
Community Services Employment Training (CSET).

• Persons Assisted: 46 persons received fair housing, education and outreach services. • Flyers Distributed: 575 flyers shared across the City of Hanford covering fair housing laws and tenant rights.
• Distribution Channels: Distributed through community agencies, schools, affordable housing complexes, and partner organizations.
• Target Audience: Provided critical, accessible housing resources and legal education to both tenants and landlords.
• Data Collection: Staff actively gathered participant demographic data during events to improve future strategic planning.
• Partnership Growth: Strengthened connections with local organizations to expand community engagement and promote equal housing opportunities

These outreach efforts provided fair housing education to community members, including both tenants and landlords, while promoting equal housing opportunities and improving access to housing services. In addition, Housing staff collected participant demogr aphic information during outreach activities to better understand the populations served and inform future planning. CSET also continued to strengthen partnerships with local organizations, enhancing collaboration and expanding community engagement to support ongoing fair housing education and outreach efforts.

8 ➢ Kings/Tulare Homeless Alliance (Continuum of Care)
Regional Homelessness Coordination & Supportive Services Program

Project Name: Regional Homelessness Coordination & Supportive Services Program • Lead Agency: City of Hanford
• Partner Agency: Kings/Tulare Homeless Alliance (Continuum of Care - CoC) • Target Facility: Hanford LINC (Located at the Episcopal Church Soup Kitchen) • National Objective: LMC — Low-and-Moderate-Income Limited Clientele • Key Housing Outcomes: 4 individuals successfully transitioned into permanent housing • Annual PIT Count: 261 unhoused individuals documented

During the reporting period, the City of Hanford partnered with the Kings/Tulare Homeless Alliance (CoC) to address regional homelessness through coordinated, multi -agency strategic efforts.

Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds supported critical tracking, administrative compliance, and field outreach activities. Specifically, funding supported the CoC as they executed the annual Point-in-Time (PIT) census, a comprehensive street and shelter count required to capture accurate demographic data, track emerging local trends, and secure regional resource allocations for the unhoused population.

A core component of this partnership's direct public service delivery was funding and operating the Hanford LINC (Local Initiative Navigation Center) hub. Operating out of the Episcopal Church Soup Kitchen, Hanford LINC served as a centralized, low -barrier drop -in resource providing vital wraparound services to 157 individuals. These essential services included:
• Mental health assessments and program enrollments
• Mainstream benefit and Social Security advocacy
• Substance abuse referrals and treatment connections
• Veteran services and housing counseling
• Document readiness support (free birth certificates and California ID vouchers) • Immediate basic needs assistance (food and hygiene item distributions)

By integrating dedicated housing navigators stationed directly at LINC, the program provided an effective pathway out of homelessness, successfully securing permanent housing connections for 4 individuals who actively participated in case management.

➢ Kings Community Action Organization – Unhoused Project Barbara Saville Emergency Shelter Support

• Lead Agency: City of Hanford
• Reporting Period: July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2026
• National Objective: LMC — Low-and-Moderate-Income Limited Clientele (Homeless Nature) • Total Beneficiaries: 67 unique individuals (37 adults and 30 children) Narrative Summary
During the reporting period from July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026, the City of Hanford utilized grant funding to support emergency sheltering operations at the Barbara Saville Shelter. The facility

9 successfully provided immediate, secure emergency housing to 67 unhoused individuals, consisting of 37 adults and 30 children, generating a total of 4,153 bed nights. Operational metrics show an average utilization rate of about 346 bed nights per month, with an average nightly occupancy of 11 beds.

To foster stabilization and self -sufficiency, the shelter paired temporary residency with comprehensive, low -barrier support services. All clients received direct case management, three nutritious meals and two snacks daily, free laundry amenities, and complimentary Wi -Fi access, along with structured referrals to partner networks for external specialized assistance. Furthermore, integrated housing navigation services effectively transitioned eligible clients into stable, permanent environments by cross-enrolling them into long-term residential assistance initiatives, including the CalAIM (California Advancing and Innovating Medi-Cal) systems.

Youth Recreation Program

Lead Agency: City of Hanford Parks and Community Services Department National Objective: LMC — Low- and Moderate-Income Limited Clientele Target Demographic: Youth ages 5 to 12 (Seasonal Day Camps) and ages 5 to 17 (Recreational Activities)
Total Beneficiaries: 13 children/families assisted
Narrative Summary
During the reporting period, the City of Hanford Parks and Community Services Department provided seasonal day camps and recreational activities for eligible low - and moderate -income youth.

Activities provided opportunities for enrichment, recreation, and social engagement during school breaks.

Through the Youth Recreation Program, 13 children/families received assistance accessing seasonal day camps and recreational activities. The program helped increase participation in recreational and out-of-school activities for low- and moderate-income youth.

➢ CDBG Youth Aquatics Safety Initiative
KCAO Preschool Swim Lessons Partnership

• Lead Agency: City of Hanford Parks & Community Services Department • Partner Agency: Kings Community Action Organization (KCAO) • National Objective: LMC — Low-and-Moderate-Income Limited Clientele • Total Beneficiaries: 27 preschool children
Narrative Summary
During the program year, the City of Hanford used Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to partner with KCAO and deliver low-cost aquatic safety and water acclimatization lessons to

10 27 preschool-aged children. Hosted at the Plunge Pool facility, this initiative successfully removed economic and logistical barriers for families by combining municipal facility space with KCAO's outreach networks. The project met HUD metrics by providing target demographic groups with basic swimming skills, water confidence, and drowning-prevention education.

➢ Senior Meal Program – Kings County Commission on Aging Home-Delivered Meals Program

• Lead Agency: City of Hanford
• Partner Agency: Kings County Commission on Aging
• National Objective: LMC — Low-and-Moderate-Income Limited Clientele (Elderly/Disabled) • Total Beneficiaries: 140 unduplicated seniors served
• Service Scope: 7 meals per week delivered once weekly (including fresh fruits and vegetables) over 5 days of service coverage throughout the year (excluding holidays).

Narrative Summary
During the 2025 program year, the City of Hanford partnered with the Kings County Commission on Aging to administer the Home-Delivered Meals Program and provide essential nutritional support to vulnerable populations. The initiative targeted homebound seniors and individuals with disabilities residing within both the City limits and surrounding unincorporated areas who are functionally unable to leave their homes or independently prepare adequate food. The program delivered 4,332 meals.

To combat food insecurity and support independent living, the program successfully delivered seven nutritious, balanced meals, along with fresh fruits and vegetables, once per week to qualified participants. Over the reporting period, the program served 140 unduplicated seniors, providing consistent nutritional baselines 5 days per week throughout the year (exclud ing holidays). By removing access barriers for individuals facing severe physical or geographical isolation, this CDBG- supported program successfully fulfilled HUD national objectives for elderly and disabled limited clientele.

➢ Emergency Assistance Payments Program
Senior Emergency Assistance Program

11 • Lead Agency: City of Hanford Community Development Department • National Objective: LMC — Low-and-Moderate-Income Limited Clientele (Elderly Presumed Benefit)
• Total Beneficiaries: 31 senior assisted
• Activity Classification: HUD Matrix Code 05Q — Subsistence Payments (Rent/Utilities) Narrative Summary
During the reporting period, the City of Hanford utilized designated grant funding to administer an emergency Subsistence Payments Program specifically targeting vulnerable elderly residents. The program provided direct short -term financial assistance to p revent displacement and utility disconnections, successfully supporting 31 low - and moderate -income senior households with critical rent and utility payments.

The administration identified a severe, disproportionate trend of financial hardship among Hanford’s senior population. Rising fixed living costs, coupled with stagnant retirement incomes, have created significant, ongoing demand for emergency housing stabilization resources. By directly mitigating these essential housing and utility deficits, the City protected at-risk seniors from housing instability and met HUD compliance metrics for low- and moderate-income limited clientele support.

➢ Food Bank Service Center Project
Project Title: KCAO Food Bank Service Center
• Implementing Agency: Kings Community Action Organization (KCAO). • Completed Progress: Expended $200,000 in CDBG funds exclusively on pre-development soft costs (planning, architectural designs, and environmental assessments). • Current Status / Evaluation: KCAO staff is evaluating a formal change in project activity from planning to physical construction (hard costs).

12 CR-10 – Racial and Ethnic
The composition of families assisted.

Describe the families assisted (including the racial and ethnic status of families assisted).

91.520(a)

Ethnicity CDBG
White 286
Black or African American 93
Asian 12
American Indian or American Native 9
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 3
American Alaskan Native & White 0
Asian White 0
Other multi-racial 51
Total: 454
Hispanic 290
Not Hispanic 589
Table 1 – Table of assistance to racial and ethnic populations by source of funds Narrative:

The City identified priority needs and continues to offer services and programs to eligible households regardless of race or ethnicity. Population data excludes Low/Moderate Area benefit data for Public Improvement and Infrastructure Improvements.

13 CR-15 - Resources and Investments 91.520(a)

Identify the resources made available.

Source of Funds Source Resources Made
Available
Amount Expended
During Program Year
CDBG Public-Federal $1,423,175 $961,071
Table 2 - Resources Made Available

Narrative:

The City of Hanford’s total PY 2025 CDBG resources were $1,423,175, as reflected in the PR-26 CDBG Financial Summary Report, consisting of:
• CDBG Grant Allocation: $523,508
• Prior-Year CDBG Resources: $645,589
• Program Income: $254,078
• Total CDBG Resources: $1,423,175
•
The City of Hanford Finance Department will finalize the total CDBG expenditures after closing FY 2025–2026. The amounts reflected in this draft are based on preliminary expenditure information available at the time of preparation.

The final PR-26 CDBG Financial Summary Report and any necessary explanations or adjustments will be included with the final CAPER submitted to HUD. One additional CDBG Administration draw may occur before finalization; therefore, Administration expenditures reflected in the draft PR -26 are subject to change.

We made every effort to use available Program Income in accordance with CDBG requirements before drawing additional entitlement funds. Expenditures may include Program Income, prior-year entitlement funds, and current-year entitlement funds, as applicable to each activity.

Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments.

Target Area Planned Percentage
of Allocation
Actual Percentage of
Allocation Narrative Description
CITY OF HANFORD 100 100 Citywide
Table 3 – Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments.

14 IDIS Low/Mod Census Tracts (eligible CDBG Target Areas) Low/Mod Income (LMI) concentration is defined as census tracts in which at least 51% of median household incomes are at or below 80% of the area's median household income. The City's PY 2025– 2026 CDBG includes the boundaries indicated on the CDBG Low/Mod target area maps. (See Attachment D-1)
Narrative:

Continuation from above:

The target area for all goals is Citywide. All assistance is provided to households within the City limits of Hanford.

15 Leveraging:

Explain how federal funds leveraged additional resources (private, state, and local funds), including how matching requirements were satisfied and how any publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction was used to address the needs identified in the plan.

During Program Year 2025, the City provided Kings Community Action Organization (KCAO) with $200,000 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to develop the Food Service Center.

KCAO provided an additional $71,663.25 from the following sources:
• State Food Bank Capacity Grant: $40,783.40
• California Department of Social Services: $13,621.27
• County of Kings American Rescue Plan Act funds: $17,258.58 In total, $271,663.25 was used to develop the Food Service Center.

The CDBG program does not require matching funds. The additional KCAO funds are reported as leveraged resources, not required matching funds.

The City used City -owned facilities for the Parks and Community Services day camp program and preschool swim lessons.

16 CR-20 - Affordable Housing 91.520(b)

Evaluation of the jurisdiction's progress in providing affordable housing, including the number and types of families served and the number of low -income, moderate -income, and middle - income persons served.

Table 4 – Number of Households

Types Supported One-Year Goal Actual
Number of households supported through
Rental Assistance 0 0
Number of households supported through
The Production of New Units 0 0
Number of households supported through
Rehab of Existing Units 14 24
Number of households supported through
Acquisition of Existing Units 0 0
Total: 14 24
Table 4 – Number of Households Supported

Types Provided One-Year Goal Actual
Number of Homeless households to be
provided with affordable housing units 0 0
Number of non-homeless households to
be provided with affordable housing units 0 0
Number of Special-Needs households to
be provided with affordable housing units 0 0
Total: 0 0

17 Discuss the difference between goals and outcomes , as well as the problems encountered in meeting these goals.

The City's Emergency Repair Program (ERP) provides immediate financial assistance to Hanford homeowners for emergency repairs . The priority is eliminating health and safety hazards. This program makes up to $24,999 in grant funds available (per household). All funds shall benefit very low- to moderate-income households. Twenty-eight (28) households received assistance through the Emergency Repair Program (ERP), utilizing CDBG funding from the previous year's action plans during the fiscal year.

Discuss how these outcomes will impact future annual action plans.

The City of Hanford will continue to evaluate its programs and adjust, as necessary, in the future One-Year Action Plans. Based on the City's experience with CDBG, the current goals and objectives will remain in place, and no significant changes are anticipated.

Include the number of low-income and moderate-income people served by each activity where information on income by family size is required to determine the activity’s eligibility. Number of Households Served
CDBG
Actual
Acutely Low 0
Extremely Low-income 577
Low-income 125
Moderate-income 42
Total: 744
Table 5 – Number of Households Served
IDIS Low/Mod Census Tracts (eligible CDBG Target Areas) Low/Mod Income (LMI) concentration is defined as census tracts where at least 51% of median household incomes are at or below 80% of the jurisdiction's median household income. The City's FY 2025–2026 CDBG boundaries are shown in the attached CDBG Low/Mod target area maps.

18 CR-25 - Homeless and Other Special Needs 91.220(d, e); 91.320(d, e); 91.520(c)

Evaluate the jurisdiction’s progress in meeting its specific objectives for reducing and ending homelessness through: Reaching out to homeless people (especially unsheltered people) and assessing their individual needs

The City of Hanford, in partnership with the Kings/Tulare Homeless Alliance (KTHA), diligently addresses homelessness within the city.

KTHA, the local Continuum of Care, coordinates efforts amongst service providers, faith -based partners, governmental agencies, and other key stakeholders. KTHA hosts multiple monthly meetings, such as the Case Management Roundtable, Membership Meetings (E xecutive, Community/Stakeholder, and Training), and the Kings County Homeless Services Partnership Meeting.

Outreach efforts have been a critical focus. The Kings View PATH team, Hanford Police Department HART (Homeless Assistance Resource Team), Champions Outreach team, Kings Community Action Organization outreach team, and KTHA Housing Navigators conduct ongo ing outreach to connect people who are least likely to access resources. Since July 2020, 1625, people experiencing homelessness have been assessed for housing. During fiscal year 25/26, 375 individuals and families experiencing homelessness enrolled in Coordinated Entry and were referred to permanent housing, and 79 families were placed into housing.

In 2024, with the help of outreach teams and service providers, KTHA’s Coordinated Entry System referred 22 individuals and families experiencing homelessness to housing at Northstar Courts, an affordable housing complex. In 2025, KTHA referred 22 individ uals experiencing homelessness to the new Sunrise Homekey project that is currently operated and owned by KCAO.

In 2023, Champions was awarded HHAP 4 funds to establish an outreach team and purchase a shower unit, providing showers to individuals experiencing homelessness. Champions has started parking the shower unit at different locations. The project was expanded in 2024 through HHAP 5 to include rapid rehousing rental assistance for individuals experiencing homelessness in Kings County. All Champions Rapid Rehousing program referrals will go through the Coordinated Entry System.

The Coordinated Entry System, operated by KTHA, includes virtually all homeless service providers within the City of Hanford. In addition to the Every Door Open approach, people experiencing homelessness can have an assessment completed by contacting 2-1-1.

Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless people Within the City of Hanford, the following programs provide emergency shelter and transitional housing for people experiencing homelessness:

19 Program
Type Organization Name Program Name
Year-
Round
Beds
ES
Kings Community Action
Organization Barbara Saville Shelter 38
ES Behavioral Health Bridge Housing 30
TH King's Gospel Mission Men’s Overnight Shelter 21
TH King's Gospel Mission Women’s Overnight Shelter 10
TH King's Gospel Mission New Song Academy 6

The emergency shelters established in response to COVID-19 through Project Roomkey have closed.

Operations at the Stardust Hotel ended in January 2023 to allow for its conversion to Sunrise Apartments, and the Holiday Lodge, the remaining Project Roomkey site in Kings County, closed on July 31, 2023. During its three-year operation, Project Roomkey provided temporary housing to 386 individuals and helped 95 individuals transition to permanent housing. The former Stardust Hotel has since been converted into Sunrise Apartments, providing 22 units of permanent supportive housing for individuals experiencing homelessness. Sunrise Apartments was completed and officially opened in July 2025.

Helping low -income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially highly low- income individuals and families and those who are likely to become homeless after being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care, and other youth facilities , and corrections programs and institutions); and, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs.

20 Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the peri od that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again.

The Alliance continues to utilize the Landlord Mitigation Fund to increase the inventory of landlords and property managers willing to lease units to people experiencing homelessness. The fund is designed to incentivize Landlords to relax screening criter ia for people who are experiencing homelessness and who may have barriers that prevent them from securing housing on their own, such as poor credit and past evictions. By offering a Fund to mitigate Landlord exposure to the increased costs of renting to individuals experiencing homelessness, including excess damage and unpaid rent, the Alliance can build strong relationships with Landlords who may otherwise be hesitant to lease to these individuals and families.

The Alliance works closely on CalAIM's integration into the homeless response system. CalAIM services include housing tenancy and housing support, which provide funds to help people secure housing (such as arrears, security deposits, etc.), as well as case management and support once someone is housed. This can decrease the length of time someone experiences homelessness and the rate at which people return to homelessness once housed.

The Coordinated Entry System collaborates with the top five households in each intervention type on the Housing Priority List to ensure they are document-ready. This focus has reduced the time people spend on the streets waiting to be placed once a unit becomes available.

21 CR-30 - Public Housing 91.220(h); 91.320(j)

Actions taken to address the needs of public housing
Kings County Housing Authority provides public housing. Providing public housing is a function of county government; therefore, the City will not fund this segment. The Housing Authority provides low-income families with decent, safe, sanitary, affordable rental housing. Additionally, the Housing Authority offers rental assistance to individuals and families through Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers and affordable housing programs.

22 CR-35 - Other Actions 91.220(j)-(k); 91.320(i)-(j)

Actions taken to remove or lessen the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing include land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and poli cies affecting the return on residential investment. 91.220 (j); 91.320 (i)
The City of Hanford adopted the 2035 General Plan on April 24, 2017. During the update process, the City made zoning ordinance changes and reviewed all policies and procedures to determine whether to update, remove, or otherwise amend them.

The City's Housing Element requires each city and county to identify existing and projected housing needs within the jurisdiction and prepare goals and policies. The City Council adopted the 2024 – 2032 Housing Element on May 19, 2026.

The City has instituted several policies and programs that encourage the development and preservation of affordable housing, including developing new affordable housing, clearing blighted properties for reuse as new housing, and rehabilitating existing houses.

Actions taken to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) The City of Hanford will continue to support the efforts of local agencies that serve special populations, such as the elderly, frail elderly, homeless persons, female heads of households, persons with disabilities, drug/alcohol addiction, farm workers, an d persons with HIV/AIDS. These agencies have an established support system in Kings County to serve these populations. Programs that the City offers that assist special populations and people experiencing homelessness in transition to permanent housing include:

• First-time homebuyer programs.
• Housing rehabilitation.
• Habitat for Humanity.
• A multi-family low-income complex funded through HOME and low -income Housing Tax Credits.

Achievements in the fiscal year to provide affordable housing include, but are not limited to, the following:
• The City maintained its First -Time Homebuyer Program during Program Year 2025 –2026; however, no households received mortgage assistance because the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) placed the HOME Program Income -funded program on hold. Approximately $1.9 million in HOME Program Income remained unavailable for use during the reporting period.
• Administered the Housing Rehabilitation Program, with $293,975 allocated to provide grants for essential health and safety repairs to eligible low- and moderate-income homeowners.

23 • Continued collaboration with and support for the Kings/Tulare Continuum of Care by allocating $10,000 in CDBG funds to support homelessness prevention, coordination, and services for individuals and families experiencing or at risk of homelessness.

Actions taken to reduce lead-based paint hazards. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) Lead is a highly toxic metal that may cause various health problems, especially in young children.

When the body absorbs lead, it can damage the brain and other vital organs, such as the kidneys, nerves, and blood. Lead-based paint was banned for residential use in 1978; therefore, housing built before 1978 is considered at risk of having lead-based paint. In Hanford, twenty-three percent (23%) of the City's housing stock is 30 years old or more. The City implemented the following strategies to reduce the presence of lead-based paint:
• Implemented the lead -based paint regulations of 24 CFR Part 92 in all federally assisted City housing programs, ensuring the safety of our residents. • Enforced federal laws through the permit process and code enforcement services by requiring contractors to be certified , ensuring the highest safety standards in our housing programs.
• Provided 'Renovate Right' pamphlets to homeowners, homebuyers, and contractors, equipping them with the necessary knowledge to tackle lead-based paint hazards. • For PY 2025 –2026, the City assisted two homeowners with lead -based paint testing and abatement activities. Through the program, eligible homeowners may receive $10,000 to $40,000 in grant assistance for lead testing and abatement.

The City took actions to reduce the number of families living in poverty. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) Through cooperative efforts, the City continues to work with the Continuum of Care, its partnering towns, and nonprofit agencies to identify resources to reduce the number of people living below the poverty level and address the community’s needs.

The City has also engaged with housing, service, and faith -based organizations to encourage partnerships and collaborate on addressing high -priority needs identified in the 10 -year Homeless Plan. Subgroup committees were formed to improve the 2-1-1 program, housing opportunities, and services.

24 Actions taken to develop institutional structure. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) Although additional work remains to achieve ADA compliance, staff will continue addressing monitoring and transition -plan findings and recommendations to help ensure that City programs comply with applicable HUD requirements.

The Community Development Department oversees the City's CDBG Program. This staff has worked diligently to improve policies, procedures, and practices to ensure the City's program complies with CDBG regulations. While much more work remains, the City's program has improved . The staff is confident about the recent activities selected and how funding has been expended.

Certification of Consistency:

The City assisted three agencies with certifications of consistency.

Actions taken to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)
The City continues to coordinate regional services through the Kings Tulare Homeless Alliance, Habitat for Humanity, Self -Help Enterprises, Kings County Health Services, and other networking opportunities.

❖ Stardust Kings Tulare Homeless Alliance (KTHA) LLC
❖ Sunrise Apartments Project, formerly the Stardust Motel

25 Identify actions taken to overcome the effects of any impediments identified in the jurisdiction’s analysis of impediments to fair housing choice. 91.520(a) An Analysis of Impediments (AI) to Fair Housing Choice, 2024–2028, was updated.

The local government can play a crucial role in providing a diverse range of housing types and ensuring housing availability that meets the needs of all sectors of the public. The City of Hanford offers affordable housing assistance programs and implements several fair housing -related policies. The City does not have a formally established fair housing policy. Still, it is committed to collaborating with community stakeholders and local advocacy partners to create a comprehensive, fair housing system and implement similar fair housing procedures. In addition, the City will continue to work with regional public transit providers to identify opportunities to improve service to low - income households and special -needs populations (including older adults and peop le with disabilities). The City will pay particular attention to the transit needs of areas where housing is affordable for low-income households and individuals with special needs.

As an entitlement grantee, the City of Hanford is required to ensure that its programs affirmatively further access to fair housing and that its policies and procedures do not discriminate against individuals based on any protected class, which would deny the opportunity to participate in access or benefit from the programs and activities carried out as part of the CDBG Program. The City has partnered with the City of Porterville and jointly solicited proposals from qualified organizations to develop, imple ment, and administer a Fair Housing Program, which has been implemented. The agency has been offering workshops in our community.

In cases of alleged discrimination, residents receive information on fair housing law, a HUD discrimination complaint form, and referrals to legal services, the State Department of Fair Housing and Employment, and other relevant agencies.

The City has partnered with a HUD -approved housing counseling agency (Community Services Employment Training, Inc.) to provide homebuyer education; this agreement was entered into before the new HUD mandate. The foreclosure education and referral process has positively impacted homeowners facing foreclosure by helping them identify options that could prevent foreclosure and by providing the public with important housing information.

Affirmative Outreach to Applicants and Participants
To affirmatively further fair housing, CSET's Housing team will continue implementing strategies that expand access to fair housing education, increase awareness of housing rights, and reduce barriers to equal housing opportunity throughout the City of Hanford.

The program will conduct targeted outreach by distributing Fair Housing and tenant rights educational materials through community agencies, schools, affordable housing communities, partner organizations, and community events, with an emphasis on reaching u nderserved populations and members of protected classes. Housing staff will continue providing education on federal, state, and local fair housing laws; tenant and landlord rights and responsibilities; and available housing resources and referral services.

Participant demographic information will continue to be collected to evaluate the effectiveness of outreach activities, identify underserved populations, and guide future outreach efforts. CSET will also strengthen partnerships with community -based organiz ations, housing providers, and other

26 stakeholders to improve referrals, coordinate services, and expand access to Fair Housing resources.

Through these activities, CSET will continue to affirmatively further fair housing by increasing public awareness, improving access to housing information and services, reducing barriers to housing choice, and promoting equal housing opportunities for all residents, particularly those who have historically experienced housing discrimination.

Fair Housing Services
Hanford collaborates with federal, state, and regional agencies to promote open housing choices and equal housing opportunity. Depending on the nature of the complaints, the City of Hanford currently refers complaints regarding housing discrimination to th e CSET, the Fair Housing Council of Central California, Legal Aid of Central California, California Rural Legal Aid, the Fresno County Housing Authority (Fair Housing Unit), and the State Department of Fair Employment and Housing.

The City has an agreement with CSET to provide fair housing education for Hanford residents.

Additionally, service agencies were available to provide free legal advice on renter and homeowner rights, housing counseling, Section 8 program information, employment services, domestic violence, and homelessness programs.

Whenever the City has a booth at community events promoting housing programs, fair housing information is provided in English and Spanish.

As previously discussed in CR -05, the City also allocates entitlement funds to provide fair housing education services. The City believes that the review of strategies used to overcome or eliminate impediments to fair housing choice demonstrates progress i n meeting the approach developed in the AI over the year.

27 CR-40 - Monitoring 91.220 and 91.230

Describe the standards and procedures used to monitor activities conducted in furtherance of the plan and used to ensure long -term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements.

The City of Hanford's staff provides ongoing technical assistance and monitors each subrecipient.

City staff conducted desktop monitoring for all subrecipient agencies to ensure compliance.

Staff monitors other programs daily and as needed for capital projects. This review will include, but is not limited to, environmental assessment, contract supervision, prevailing wage compliance, reporting, reimbursement request review, and processing.

The City proactively and continually evaluates programs and activities to ensure they meet targeted goals and align with current funding levels. When funds are moving slowly, it is recommended to consider another project or program.

Citizen Participation Plan 91.105(d); 91.115(d) Describe the efforts to provide citizens with reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment on performance reports.

Before submitting the CAPER to HUD, the City publishes a notice in English and Spanish in the Hanford Sentinel soliciting public comment. The public comment period runs from September 1, 2026, through September 1 6, 2026. Copies of the CAPER are available for public review at the Community Development Department counter in City Hall and on the City’s website.

The CAPER requires a public hearing before the City Council to approve the document before submission to HUD. Community hearings are held in a community space, considering the convenience to beneficiaries of the entitlement program resources. A Public Hearing is scheduled for September 15, 2026, at 7:00 p.m., located in the Council Chambers, 400 N. Douty Street, Hanford, CA 93230.

Copies of the report are available at the City of Hanford Community Development Department and on the City of Hanford website.

Public Comments: Comments received will be included in the final document at the end of the public review period and the public hearing.

28 CR-45 - CDBG 91.520(c)

Please specify the nature and reasons for any changes in the jurisdiction’s program objectives and indicate how the jurisdiction would change its programs based on its experiences.

The 2025–2026 program year represents the second year of the City's five -year Consolidated Plan (2024–2028). During this reporting period, the City continued implementing the priorities and objectives identified in the Consolidated Plan while evaluating progress toward its five-year goals.

The City continues to proactively evaluate programs, projects, policies, and activities to meet targeted goals and align with current funding levels. Based on experience, the City Council provides challenging, strategic recommendations. For example, the City Council recommends an alternative priority project or program when funding moves slowly.
• Emergency Rental Assistance
• Home Delivered Meals for Homebound Seniors
• Small Business Assistance
• Food Service Center
• Homeowner Rehabilitation

29 ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A - Accomplishments
Attachment A-1: Cover Page
Attachment A-2: Table 1 - Expenditures and Accomplishments Attachment A-3: City Council Staff Report
Attachment A-4: City Council Resolution
Note: Some attachments are pending and will be included in the final CAPER submitted to HUD.

Attachement A-1 :- Cover Page

CA LI F O R N I A

W H ERE TRA D IT IO N MEET S TO M O RRO W
PROGRAM YEAR 2025/26

CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND

EVALUATION REPORT (CAPER)
Housing and Community Development
3 I 7 N. Douty Street
Hanford. CA 93230

Attachment A-2: PY 2025/26 CDBG Expenditures and Accomplishments City of Hanford - Combined Funding Sources
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
CDBG Expenditures Amount Accomplishments
Administration and Planning
CDBG Administration and Planning $ 128,200.56 Program administration and oversight Total Administration and Planning $128,200.56
Public Services
Kings/Tulare Homeless Alliance - CoC I PIT Count/ Hanford LINC $11,671.19 157 individuals assisted; 4 transitioned to permanent housing
Kings Community Action Organization - Barbara Saville Emergency Shelter $ 20,040.00 67 individuals assisted; 4,153 bed nights provided
Kings County Commission on Aging - Home-Delivered Meals $30,328.77 140 individuals assisted CSET - Fair Housing Education and Outreach $2,781.17 46 individuals assisted; 575 fair housing/tenant-rights flyers distributed
Parks & Community Services - Youth and Senior Community Recreation $9,020.00 42 individuals assisted Kings County Commission on Aging - Senior Subsistence Payments $ 14,671.23 31 individuals assisted with rent and/or utilities
Total Public Services $88,512.36
Affordable Housing
Emergency/Minor Home Repair Program $ 384,100.80 24 low- and moderate-income homeowner households assisted
Homeowner Rehabilitation - Activity Delivery $ 9,912.21 Program delivery costs supporting housing rehabilitation activities
Total Affordable Housing $ 394,013.01
Public Facility Improvements
Pre-development planning, architectural
Kings Community Action Organization - Food Bank Service Center $ 350,345.06 design, and environmental work advanced
Total Public Facility Improvements $ 350,345.06
Total PY 2025/26 CDBG Expenditures $ 961,070.99
Note: Expenditures combine PY 2025 entitlement funds, CDBG program income, and prior-year CDBG grant funds expended during the PY 2025/26 reporting period. Amounts are based on the PR26 CDBG Financial Summary Report dated August 27, 2026.

Attachment B - Citizen Participation
Attachment B-1: Public Notice - English and Spanish
Attachment B-2: Legal Ad - Affidavit
*Attachment B-3: City Website - CDBG Public Notice Page *Attachment B-4: Citizen Participation Summary
*Note: Some attachments are pending and will be included in the final CAPER submitted to HUD.

Attachment B-1: Public Notice - English
Public Notice
Request for Review and Comment and Public Hearing on the City of Hanford's 2025 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program
The City of Hanford will submit its Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) for Program Year 2025 (July 1, 2025 - June 30, 2026) to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) no later than September 30, 2026.

The CAPER is an annual report that describes the City's performance in meeting the goals of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. The City uses CDBG funds to provide decent, safe, and affordable housing, create a suitable living environment, and expand economic opportunities, principally for persons of low- and moderate-income. The Annual Action Plan identifies the projects and programs previously reviewed and adopted by the City Council to address the priorities identified in the City's Five-Year Consolidated Plan.

In accordance with the City's Citizen Participation Plan, the draft 2025 CAPER will be available for a fifteen (15)-day public review and comment period from September 1, 2026, through September 16, 2026. The City will make the draft CAPER available for public review on its website at https://www.cityofhanfordca.com.

Citizens may submit written comments during the fifteen (15)-day public comment period by mail, in person, or by email. Comments must be received or postmarked no later than September 16, 2026, and may be submitted to:

City of Hanford - Housing Division
Attention: Sandra Lerma, Housing Analyst
317 N. Douty Street
Hanford, CA 93230
Email: [email protected][
The City invites all interested residents to attend the public hearing and provide comments on the draft 2025 CAPER.

City Council Public Hearing
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
7:00 p.m.

City Council Chambers
400 N. Douty Street
Hanford, CA 93230

If you have questions or require language interpretation, disability accommodations, or other special services, please contact the City Clerk at (559) 585-2515 or (559) 585-4766 at least five (5) days before the meeting.

The City of Hanford does not discriminate in employment and housing program opportunities or practices based on race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, disability, or any other characteristic protected by law.

Publication Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2026

Attachment B-1: Public Notice - Spanish
Aviso Publlco
Solicitud de Revision y Comentarios y Audiencia Pubtica sobre el lnforme Consolidado Anual de Desempefio y Evaluacion (CAPER) 2025 de la Ciudad de Hanford para el Programa de Subvenciones en Bloque para el Desarrollo Comunitario (CDBG) La Ciudad de Hanford presentara su lnforme Consolidado Anual de Desempefio y Evaluacion (CAPER) correspondiente al Afio del Programa 2025 (1 de julio de 2025 al 30 de junio de 2026) al Departamento de Vivienda y Desarrollo Urbano de los Estados Unidos (HUD) a mas tardar el 30 de septiembre de 2026.

El CAPER es un informe anual que describe el desempefio de la Ciudad en el cumplimiento de los objetivos del Programa de Subvenciones en Bloque para el Desarrollo Comunitario (CDBG). La Ciudad utiliza estos fondos para proporcionar viviendas dignas, seguras y asequibles, crear un entorno de vida adecuado y ampliar las oportunidades econornicas, principalmente para personas de ingresos bajos y moderados. El Plan de Accion Anual identifica los proyectos y programas previamente revisados y aprobados por el Concejo Municipal para atender las prioridades identificadas en el Plan Consolidado de Cinco Anos de la Ciudad.

De conformidad con el Plan de Participacion Ciudadana de la Ciudad, el borrador del CAPER 2025 estara disponible para un perfodo de revision publica y comentarios de quince (15) dfas, del 1 de septiembre de 2026 al 16 de septiembre de 2026. El borrador del CAPER estara disponible para la revision pubtica en el sitio web de la Ciudad:
https://www.cityofhanfordca.com.

Los ciudadanos pod ran presentar comentarios por escrito durante el perfodo de revision publica de quince (15) dfas por correo, en persona o por correo etectronico. Los comentarios deberan recibirse o tener matasellos con fecha no posterior al 16 de septiembre de 2026, y podran enviarse a:

Ciudad de Hanford - Division de Vivienda
Atencion: Sandra Lerma, Analista de Vivienda
317 N. Douty Street
Hanford, CA 93230
Correo etectronlco: [email protected]
La Ciudad invita a todos los residentes interesados a asistir a la audiencia publica y presentar sus comentarios sobre el borrador del CAPER 2025.

Concejo Municipal- Audiencia Publlca
martes, 15 de septiembre de 2026
7:00 p.m.

Carnaras del Concejo Municipal
400 N. Douty Street
Hanford, CA 93230
Si tiene preguntas o necesita un interprets, adaptaciones por discapacidad u otros servicios especiales, comunfquese con la Secretarfa Municipal al (559) 585-2515 o al (559) 585-4766 por lo menos cinco (5) dlas antes de la reunion.

La Ciudad de Hanford no discrimina en las oportunidades o practlcas de empleo ni en los prograrnas de vivienda por motives de raza, color, religion, origen nacional, edad, sexo, orientacion sexual, estado civil, discapacidad o cualquier otra caracterfstica protegida por la ley.

Fecha de publicaci6n: miercotes, 26 de agosto de 2026

Attachment B-2
Legal Ad Affidavit - The Sentinel

THE SENTINEL
"PROOF OF PUBLICATION*
The Sentinel
SM California ~le1.·1s Meuia Inc
P.O. Box 9
Hanford. CA 93232
Phone (559) 582-0471
bill1n[[email protected] l.corn
Si-\NDRA LERMA
315 N Douty St
Hanforcl CA 93230
ORDER NUIYIBER 620193
Pubhcation- Tl1," Hanford Sentinel
State of Florida. County of Broward ss
Anjana Bl1adonva being first duly sworn, deposes and savs: That (s)he 1s a duly authonzed sumatory of Column Software, F'BC, duly authorized agent of The Hanford Sentinel. a newspaper pnnted and published 111 the City of Hanford, County ol Kin[JS, State of California, and which newspaper bas been adjudged a newspaper of general crrculation by t11e superior court of the County of Ki nos, State of California, under the elate of October 23 1951 case number 11623.

That I know from my own personal knowledqe tile notice, of v1t1icl1 tile annexed is a primed copy (set in rvpe not smaller than nonpareil), nas been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspapers and not 111 unv supplement thereof on tile follow1ny dates, to wit.

Secuon: Legals
Ciuegory: 201 Pubhc Nonces

PUBLISHED ON
Aug. :26. 2026
TO Li\L ;\D COST 395.67
FILED ON. 8126/20'.26
I ce.ntv under penalty or· peijurv under tile li.l'NS of tile State of Califorrua that the Ioreuomq is ti ue and correct

VERIFICATION
State of Florida
Countv or Broward

SHERI SMITH
Notary Public - State of Florida
Commission # HHB0444B
Expires on May 31, 2030
Subscribed in rnv presence and sworn to before me ,1n t111s· 08/27/2026 Notarv Public
Notarized remotely online using communication technology via Proof.

Public Notice
Request for Review and Comment
and Public Hearing on the City
of Hantord's 2025 Consolidated
Annual Performance and Evaluation
Report (CAPER) for the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG)
Program
The City of Hanford will submit its
Consolidated Annual Performance
and Evaluation Report (CAPER)
for Program Year 2025 (July 1,
2025 - June 30, 2026) lo the U.S,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) no later than
September 30, 2026.

The CAPER is an annual report that
describes the City's performance in
meeting the goals of the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG)
Program. The City uses CDBG
funds to provide decent, safe, and
affordable housing, create a suitable
living environment, and expand
economic opportunities, primarily for
low- and moderate-income persons.

The Annual Action Plan identifies
the projects and programs the City
Council previously reviewed and
adopted to address the priorities
identified in the City's Five-Year
Consolidated Plan.

In accordance with the City's
Citizen Participation Plan, the draft
2025 CAPER will be available for a
fifteen (15)-day public review and
comment period from September
1, 2026 through September 16,
2026. Ti1e City will make the draft
CAPER available for public review
on its website at b!!p..§.;//ww~
cityofhanfot:dca,c.oni
Citizens may submit written
comments during the fifteen (15)­
day public comment period by mail,
in person, or by email. Comments
must be received or postmarked no
later than September 16, 2026, and
may be submitted to:

City of Hanford - Housing Division
Attention: Sandra Lerma, Housing
Analyst
317 N. Douty Street
Hanford, CA 93230
Email: holising@hanfordca,gov
The City invites all interested
residents to attend the public
hearing and provide comments on
the draft 2025 CAPER.

City Council Public Hearing
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
7:00 p.m.

City Council Chambers
400 N. Douty Street
Hanford, CA 93230
If you have questions or require
language interpretation, disability
accommodations, or other special
services, .elease contact the City
Clerk at (559) 585-2515 or (559)
585-4766 at least five (5) days
before the meeting.

The City of Hanford does not
discriminate in employment and
housing program opportunities or
practices based on race. color,
religion. national origin, age, sex,
sexual orientation, marital status,
disability, or any other characteristic
protected by law.

Publication Date: Wednesday,
August 26, 2026
2025 CDBG CAPEH - New Public Hearing Date - Page 1 of 2

Aviso Publico
Solicitud de Revision y Comentarios
y Audiencia Publica sobre el lnforme
Consolidado Anual de Dasernpario
y Evaluaci6n (CAPER) 2025 de la
Ciudad de Hanford para el Programa
de Subvenciones en Bloque para el
Desarrollo Cornunitario (CDBG)
La Ciudad de Hanford prosoniara
su lnforrne Consolidado Anual
de Dssempsno y Evaluacion
(CAPER) correspondiente al Ano
del Prograrna 2025 (del 1 de julio
de 2025 al 30 de junio de 2026)
al Departamento de Vivienda y
Dosarrollo Urbano de los Estados
Unidos (HUD) a mas tardar el 30 de
septiembre de 2026.

El CAPER es un informe anual
que describe el dssernpefio de
la Ciudad en el cumplimiento de
los objetivos del Programa de
Subvenciones en Bloque para el
Desarrollo Comunitario (CDBG).

La Ciudad utiliza estos fondos para
proporcionar viviendas dignas.
seguras y asequibles, crear un
entorno de vida adecuado y arnpllar
las oportunidades sccnomicas,
principalmente para personas de
,ngresos bajos y medics. El Plan
de Accion Anual ldentifica los
proyectos y programas previamente
revisados y aprobados por el
Concejo Municipal para atender las
prioridades del Plan Consolidado de
Cinco Anos de la Ciudad.

De conformidad con el Plan de
Participacion Ciudadana de la
Ciudad. el borrador del CAPER
2025 sstara disponible para un
periodo de revision pubhca y
comentarios de quince (15) dlas, del
1 de septiembre de 2026 of 16 de
septiembre de 2026 . El borrador
del CAPER sstara disponible
para la revision publica en el sitio
web de la Ciudad: llU11s://w.'fil'll,
cityothantordca.com .

Los ciudadanos podran presentar
comentarios por escrito durante
el perfodo de revision publica de
quince (15) dias por correo, en
persona o por correo efectr6nico.

Los comentarios debaran recibirse
o tenor matasellos con fecha no
posterior al 16 de septiembre de
2026, y podran enviarse a:

Ciudad de Hanford - Division de
Vivienda
Atoncion: Sandra Lerma. Analista
de Vivlenda
317 N. Douty Street
Hanford. CA 93230
Correo electr6nico: housing@
hnnfordco.gov
La Ciudad invita a todos los
residentes interesados a asistir a la
audiencia pubiica y presentar sus
comentarios sobre el borrador del
CAPER 2025.

Concejo Municipal - Audiencio
Publlca
rnartes, 15 de septiembre de 2026
7:00 p.m.

Cameras del Concejo Municipal
400 N. Douty Street
Hanford, CA 93230
Si tiene preguntas o necesita
un intsrpreta, adaptaciones por
discapacidad u otros servicios
especiales. comunfquese con la
Secretaria Municipal al (559) 585•
2515 o al (559) 585--4766 per lo
menos cinco (5) dins antes de la
reuni6n.

La Ciudad de Hanford no discrimina
en las oportunidades o practices
de empleo ni en los prograrnas de
vivienda por motives de raza, color,
religion. origen nacional, edad,
sexo, orientaci6n sexual, estado
civil, discapacidad o cualquier otra
caracterfst1ca protegida per la ley.

Fee ha de publicaci6n: miercoles,
26 de agosto de 2026
Publish: August 26, 2026
Ad# 620193
2025 CDBG CAPER· l\lew Public Hearing Date · Paqe 2 of 2

Attachment C - Continuum of Care Report
Attachment C-1: Point-in-Time Survey Report- to be added Attachment C-2: Point-in-Time Survey Results
Note: Some attachments are pending and will be included in the final CAPER submitted to HUD

Attachment C-2:

Point-in-Time Survey Results
2026 Kings County: Hanford
Clients %of Clients
Adults 251 96%
Total Count Children 10 4%
Unknown 0 0%
Grand Total 261
Households Clients
Without Children 241 247 Household Composition
With Children and Adults 4 13
With Only Children 1 1
Households Clients Unaccompanied/ Unaccompanied youth 7 7 Parenting Youth (up to age 24) Parenting youth 0 0
Child of youth parent 0
Households Clients
Chronically No 148 160
Homeless Yes 98 101
Unknown 0 0
Clients %of Clients
Sex Male 169 65%
Female 90 34%
Unknown 2 1%
Clients % of Clients
0-17 10 4%
18-24 7 3%
25-34 41 16%
Age Group 35-44 68 26%
45-54 70 27%
55-64 46 18%
65-69 9 3%
70+ 10 4%
Unknown 0 0%
Clients %of Clients
American Indian/ Alaskan Native 9 3%
Asian 2 1%
Black/African American 55 21%
Race* Hispanic/Latino 121 46%
Middle Eastern 1 0%
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 3 1%
White 98 38%
Unknown 4 2%
Tribal Affiliation Clients %of Clients
(Street Survey/Adults Only) No 176 70%
Yes 8 3%
Clients % of Clients
Currently Fleeing Domestic No 208 83% Violence
(Adults only) Yes 20 8%
Unknown 23 9%
Clients ¾of Clients
Bisexual 6 2%
Gay 3 1%
Sexual Orientation Lesbian 3 1%
(Street Survey/Adults Only) Questioning 0 0%
Straight/ Heterosexual 158 63%
Two Spirit 0 0%
Other/Not Listed 9 4%
Unknown 5 2%
Clients %of Clients
Place Slept Emergency Shelter 48 18%
Last Night Transitional Housing 27 10%
Street 186 71%
Clients ¾o f Clients
Location
(County) Within Kings County 261 100%
Within Tulare County 0 0%
Clients % of Clients
Veteran Yes 10 4%
(Adults only) No 241 96%
Unknown 0 0%
Clients % of Clients
Times Homeless Once/ First Time 66 26%
(Street Survey/Adults Only) Twice or More 110 44%
Unknown 8 3%
Clients % of Clients
No 128 49% Disabling Condition
Yes 128 49%
Unknown 5 2%
Clients ¾o f Clients
Barriers HIV/AIDS 3 1%
Mental Illness 104 40%
Substance Abuse 96 37%
Clients %of Clients
Aged out of Foster Care 1 1%
Argument 25 13%
Divorce 10 5%
Domestic Violence 2 1%
Drugs or Alcohol 7 4%
Eviction 22 12%
Foreclosure 2 1%
Hospital Discharge 1 1% Reason for Homeless
(Street Survey/Adults Only) Jail or Prison 12 6%
Lost Benefits 2 1%
Medical Condition 7 4%
Mental Health 12 6%
No Aff ordable Housing 26 14%
Pets Not Allowed 0 0%
Substandard Housing 3 2%
Unemployment 41 22%
Other 0 0%
Refused/ Unknown 11 6%
Clients %of Clients
SNAP 143 57%
SSI 26 10%
SSDI 12 5%
GA 17 7%
Earned Income 9 4%
TANF 8 3%
Social Security 2 1%
Pension 1 0%
Benefits• Child Support 1 0%
(Adults Only) VA Disability Service 3 1%
Medi-Cal 155 62%
Medicare 4 2%
Unemployment 3 1%
Workers Compensation 1 0%
Alimony 1 0%
Private Disability 1 0%
Other 5 2%
None 36 14%
Refused/ Unknown 9 4%
•can identify with one or more response

Attachment D - Low-Mod Target Areas Map
Attachment D-1: CDBG Low-Mod Target Areas

LMI \;ensus rracts & ts1ocK \iroups
City of Hanford, 2025
rtt~~ c=!l 00
N I =!I
Tract 1 ~
A '~ ~ ~ I I I LU
~ I
@IA~
act 5
LU
a ~ N ....
)
I IONAAVE ~ ~ ~ - - ---- - - - +-- - - -
w
~
:c
5: I
_I _ _ I Hanford City Limits
_I I Qualified Census Blocks _,._ _ .,____ -ti
Low-Income or
I Disadvantaged
- - ~ Communities Designatec
by California
- - -1 Census Tracts
- - - Major Highways
- - - Streets
- Tract 12

IOAHO AVE
Map Prepared by Maddison Faria
September 10, 2025
317 N Douty St
Hanford, Ca 93230
0 0.5 1 2 - - - - - - - - •a!,_ - NFC

Attachment E - IDIS Reports
Attachment E-1: PR-26 CDBG Financial Summary Report
Attachment E-2: PR-26 CDBG Activity Summary Report
Note: Some attachments are pending and will be included in the final CAPER submitted to HUD

Attachment E- 1:

PR-26 CDBG Financial Summary Report
Office of Community Planning and Development
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Integrated Disbursement and Infonnation System
PR26 - CDBG Financial Summary Report
Program Year 2025

HANFORD, CA
PART I: SUMMARY OF CDBG RESOURCES
01 UNEXPENDED CDBG FUNDS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 02 ENTITl EMENT GRANT
03 SURPLUS URBAN RENEWAL
04 SECTION 108 GUARANTEED LOAN FUNDS
05 CURRENT YEAR PROGRAM INCOME
05a CURRENT YEAR SECTION 108 PROGRAM INCOME (FOR SI TYPE) 06 FUNDS RETURNED TO THE LINE-OF-CREDIT
06a FUNDS RETURNED TO THE LOCAL CDBG ACCOUNT
07 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL AVAILABLE
08 TOTAL AVAILABLE (SUM, LINES 01-07)
PART II: SUMMARY OF CDBG EXPENDITURES
09 DISBURSEMENTS OTHER THAN SECTION 108 REPAYMENTS AND PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION 10 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL AMOUNT SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT 11 AMOUNT SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT (LINE 09 + LINE 10) 12 DISBURSED IN !DIS FOR PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION
13 DISBURSED IN !DIS FOR SECTION 108 REPAYMENTS
14 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL EXPENDITURES
15 TOTAL EXPENDITURES (SUM, LINES 11-14)
16 UNEXPENDED BALANCE (LINE 08 - LINE 15)
PART III: LOWMOD BENEFIT THIS REPORTING PERIOD
17 EXPENDED FOR LOW/MOD HOUSING IN SPECIAL AREAS
18 EXPENDED FOR LOW/MOD MUL Tl-UNIT HOUSING
19 DISBURSED FOR OTHER LOW/MOD ACTIVm ES
20 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL LOW/MOD CREDIT
21 TOTAL LOW/MOD CREDIT (SUM, LINES 17-20)
22 PERCENT LOW/MOD CREDIT (LINE 21/LINE 11)

LOW/ MOD BENEFIT FOR MULTI-YEAR CERTIFICATIONS
23 PROGRAM YEARS(PY) COVERED IN CERTIFICATION
24 CUMULATIVE NET EXPENDITURES SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT CALCULATION 25 CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURES BENEFITING LOW/MOD PERSONS
26 PERCENT BENEFIT TO LOW/MOD PERSONS (LINE 25/LINE 24) PART IV: PUBLIC SERVICE (PS) CAP CALCULATIONS
27 DISBURSED IN !DIS FOR PUBLIC SERVICES
28 PS UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF CURRENT PROGRAM YEAR 29 PS UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 30 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL PS OBLIGATIONS
31 TOTAL PS OBLIGATIONS (LINE 27 + LINE 28 - LINE 29 + LINE 30) 32 ENTITl EMENT GRANT
33 PRIOR YEAR PROGRAM INCOME
34 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL SUBJECT TO PS CAP
35 TOTAL SUBJECT TO PS CAP (SUM, LINES 32-34)
36 PERCENT FUNDS OBLIGATED FOR PS ACTIVm ES (LINE 31/LINE 35) PART V: PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION (PA) CAP
37 DISBURSED IN !DIS FOR PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION
38 PA UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF CURRENT PROGRAM YEAR 39 PA UN LIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 40 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL PA OBLIGATIONS
41 TOTAL PA OBLIGATIONS (LINE 37 + LINE 38 - LINE 39 +LINE 40) 42 ENTITl EMENT GRANT
43 CURRENT YEAR PROGRAM INCOME
44 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL SUBJECT TO PA CAP
45 TOTAL SUBJECT TO PA CAP (SUM, LINES 42-44)
46 PERCENT FUNDS OBLIGATED FOR PA ACTIVm ES (LINE 41/LINE 45) DATE:

TIME:

PAGE:
08-27-26
15:15
645,588.68
523,508.00

0.00 0.00
254,077.93

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
1,423,174.61
832,870.43

0.00 832,870.43
128,200.56

0.00 0.00
961,070.99
462,103.62

0.00 0.00
832,870.43

0.00 832,870.43
100.00%
PY: 2024 PY: 2025 PY: 2026
1,531,999.00

0.00 0.00%
88,512.36

0.00 0.00

0.00 88,512.36
523,508.00
582,753.05

0.00 1,106,261.05

8.00%
128,200.56
5,980.00
o.oo

0.00 134,180.56
523,508.00
254,077.93

0.00 777,585.93

17.26%

Office of Community Planning and Development
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
PR26 - CDBG Financial Summary Report
Program Year 2025

HANFORD, CA
LINE 17 DETAIL: ACTIVm ES TO CONSIDER IN DETERMINING THE AMOUNT TO ENTER ON LINE 17 No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data.

DATE:

TIME:

PAGE:
08-27-26
15:15
2 LINE 18 DETAIL: ACTIVm Es TO CONSIDER IN DETERMINING THE AMOUNT TO ENTER ON LINE 18 No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data.

LINE 19 DETAIL: ACTIVm ES INCLUDED IN THE COMPUTATION OF LINE 19 Plan IDIS IDIS Voucher Activity Na me Matrix National
Year Project Activity Number Code Objective Drawn Amount 2024 6 369 7081055 AP24 FOOD SERVICE CENTER 03C LMC $23,965.50 2024 6 369 7125983 AP24 FOOD SERVICE CENTER 03C LMC $126,234.50 2024 6 369 7126007 AP24 FOOD SERVICE CENTER 03C LMC $49,800.00 2025 7 373 7147049 AP25 FOOD SERVICE CENTER 03C LMC $137,468.23 2025 7 373 7181570 AP25 FOOD SERVICE CENTER 03C LMC $9,056.23 2025 7 373 7186070 AP25 FOOD SERVICE CENTER 03C LMC $3,820.60 OJC Matrix Code $350,345.06
2024 7 359 7080916 PUBLIC SERVICES - Homeless Point-In-Tlrne Count/ LINC-KTHA/COC AP24 03T LMC $769.98 2024 7 359 7080918 PUBLIC SERVICES - Homeless Point-in-n me Count/ LINC-KTHA/COC AP24 03T LMC $901.21 2025 3 376 7147029 PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS TULARE COC -PIT and Hanford LINC 03T LMC $836.19 2025 3 376 7147030 PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS TULARE COC -PIT and Hanford LINC 03T LMC $638.96 2025 3 376 7147031 PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS TULARE COC -PIT and Hanford LINC 03T LMC $775.52 2025 3 376 7147032 PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS TULARE COC -PIT and Hanford LINC 03T LMC $746.18 2025 3 376 7147033 PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS TULARE COC -PIT and Hanford LINC 03T LMC $667.38 2025 3 376 7147035 PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS TULARE coc -PIT and Hanford LINC 03T LMC $730.79 2025 376 7147037 PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS TULARE COC -PIT and Hanford LINC 03T LMC $816.99 2025 3 376 7147038 PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS TULARE COC -PIT and Hanford LINC 03T LMC $728.42 2025 3 376 7147042 PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS TULARE COC -PIT and Hanford LINC 03T LMC $685.41 2025 3 376 7181554 PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS TULARE COC -PIT and Hanford LINC 03T LMC $2,313.13 2025 3 376 7181555 PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS TULARE COC -PIT and Hanford LINC 03T LMC $1,061.03 2025 4 377 7147056 PUBLIC SERVICES - UNHOUSED PERSONS PROGRAMS -KCAO 03T LMC $3,949.32 2025 4 377 7147060 PUBLIC SERVICES - UNHOUSED PERSONS PROGRAMS -KCAO 03T LMC $6,713.43 2025 4 377 7147062 PUBLIC SERVICES - UNHOUSED PERSONS PROGRAMS -KCAO 03T LMC $3,168.07 2025 4 377 7147063 PUBLIC SERVICES - UN HOUSED PERSONS PROGRAMS -KCAO 03T LMC $2,888.84 2025 4 377 7147064 PUBLIC SERVICES - UN HOUSED PERSONS PROGRAMS -KCAO 03T LMC $2,759.76 2025 4 377 7147066 PUBLIC SERVICES - UN HOUSED PERSONS PROGRAMS -KCAO 03T LMC $560.58 OJT Matrix Code $31,711.19
2025 3 375 7147051 PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS COMMISSION ON AGING MEAL PROG AP25 05A LMC $5,000.00 2025 3 375 7147053 PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS COMMISSION ON AGING MEAL PROG AP25 05A LMC $5,000.00 2025 3 375 7181559 PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS COMMISSION ON AGING MEAL PROG AP25 05A LMC $5,000.00 2025 3 375 7181561 PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS COMMISSION ON AGING MEAL PROG AP25 05A LMC $5,000.00 2025 3 375 7181564 PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS COMMISSION ON AGING MEAL PROG AP25 05A LMC $5,000.00 2025 3 375 7186067 PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS COMMISSION ON AGING MEAL PROG AP25 05A LMC $5,328.77 OSA Matrix Code $30,328.77
2025 6 374 7181557 PUBLIC SERVICE - FAIR HOUSING PROGRAM -CSET 05J LMC $2,781.17 OSJ Matrix Code $2,781.17
2025 8 380 7189458 YOUTIH AND SENIOR COMMUNITY RECREATION PROGRAM AP25 05L LMC $9,020.00 OSL Matrix Code $9,020.00
2025 3 372 7181560 PUBLIC SERVICES SUBSTINENCE PAYMENTS -KINGS COMMISSION ON AGING (2025) 05Q LMC $12,003.99 2025 3 372 7181563 PUBLIC SERVICES SUBSTINENCE PAYMENTS -KINGS COMMISSION ON AGING (2025) 05Q LMC $801.62 2025 3 372 7186507 PUBLIC SERVICES SUBSTINENCE PAYMENTS -KINGS COMMISSION ON AGING (2025) 05Q LMC $310.14 2025 372 7186515 PUBLIC SERVICES SUBSTINENCE PAYMENTS -KINGS COMMISSION ON AGING (2025) 05Q LMC $1,555.48 OSQ Matrix Code $14,671.23
2022 347 7181514 EMERGENCY REPAIR HOUISING REHAB AP22 14A LMH $2,525.00 2022 347 7181519 EMERGENCY REPAIR HOUISING REHAB AP22 14A LMH $2,565.00 2022 347 7181528 EMERGENCY REPAIR HOUISING REHAB AP22 14A LMH $127.89 2024 2 363 7051003 HOMEOWNER EMERGENCY & MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM AP24 14A LMH $16,867.97 2024 2 363 7051008 HOMEOWNER EMERGENCY & MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM AP24 14A LMH $9,148.06 2024 2 363 7051010 HOMEOWNER EMERGENCY & MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM AP24 14A LMH $1,348.94

l~'11i~i11'\ Office of Community Planning and Development D.A:TE: 08-27-26 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development TIME: lS:l S Integrated Disbursement and Infonmation System PAGE: 3
t~* 11111111 : ; PR26 - CDBG Financial Summary Report
'9s,q,v oev~•..O Program Year 202S

HANFORD, CA
Plan IDIS IDIS Voucher Activity Name Matrix National
Year Project Activity Number Code Objective Drawn Amount 2024 2 363 7051014 HOMEOWNER EMERGENCY & MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM AP24 14A LMH $10,558.24 2024 2 363 7061982 HOMEOWNER EMERGENCY & MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM AP24 14A LMH $S,537.28 2024 2 363 7080928 HOMEOWNER EMERGENCY & MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM AP24 14A LMH $13,460.00 2024 2 363 7080931 HOMEOWNER EMERGENCY & MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM AP24 14A LMH $12,500.00 2024 2 363 7080934 HOMEOWNER EMERGENCY & MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM AP24 14A LMH $16,500.00 2024 2 363 7080936 HOMEOWNER EMERGENCY & MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM AP24 14A LMH $14,000.00 2024 2 363 7080941 HOMEOWNER EMERGENCY & MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM AP24 14A LMH $15,650.00 2024 2 363 7080947 HOMEOWNER EMERGENCY & MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM AP24 14A LMH $14,770.00 2024 2 363 7080948 HOMEOWNER EMERGENCY & MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM AP24 14A LMH $4,341.22 2024 2 363 7125994 HOMEOWNER EMERGENCY & MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM AP24 14A LMH $1,570.00 2024 2 363 7125995 HOMEOWNER EMERGENCY & MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM AP24 14A LMH $1,540.00 2024 2 363 7125996 HOMEOWNER EMERGENCY & MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM AP24 14A LMH $1,630.00 2024 2 363 7125998 HOMEOWNER EMERGENCY & MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM AP24 14A LMH $11,072.21 2024 2 363 7126006 HOMEOWNER EMERGENCY & MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM AP24 14A LMH $1,660.00 2024 2 363 7146986 HOMEOWNER EMERGENCY & MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM AP24 14A LMH $7,190.70 2024 2 363 7147008 HOMEOWNER EMERGENCY & MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM AP24 14A LMH $2,370.00 2024 2 363 7147010 HOMEOWNER EMERGENCY & MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM AP24 14A LMH $10,572.00 2024 2 363 7147013 HOMEOWNER EMERGENCY & MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM AP24 14A LMH $22,039.44 2024 2 363 7181528 HOMEOWNER EMERGENCY & MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM AP24 14A LMH $1,222.11 2024 2 363 7181534 HOMEOWNER EMERGENCY & MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM AP24 14A LMH $15,700.00 2024 2 363 7181542 HOMEOWNER EMERGENCY & MINOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM AP24 14A LMH $8,199.88 2025 2 378 7147014 HOMEOWNER REHAB EMERGENCY & MINOR REPAIR 2025 14A LMH $4,219.00 2025 2 378 7147016 HOMEOWNER REHAB EMERGENCY & MINOR REPAIR 2025 14A LMH $12,130.00 2025 2 378 7147019 HOMEOWNER REHAB EMERGENCY & MINOR REPAIR 2025 14A LMH $17,325.00 2025 2 378 7147020 HOMEOWNER REHAB EMERGENCY & MINOR REPAIR 2025 14A LMH $11,310.00 2025 2 378 7147022 HOMEOWNER REHAB EMERGENCY & MINOR REPAIR 2025 14A LMH $17,885.00 2025 2 378 7147023 HOMEOWNER REHAB EMERGENCY & MINOR REPAIR 2025 14A LMH $9,640.00 2025 2 378 7181542 HOMEOWNER REHAB EMERGENCY & MINOR REPAIR 2025 14A LMH $9,750.12 2025 378 7181544 HOMEOWNER REHAB EMERGENCY & MINOR REPAIR 2025 14A LMH $1,620.00 2025 2 378 7181546 HOMEOWNER REHAB EMERGENCY & MINOR REPAIR 2025 14A LMH $15,240.00 2025 2 378 7181550 HOMEOWNER REHAB EMERGENCY & MINOR REPAIR 2025 14A LMH $13,925.74 2025 2 378 7181551 HOMEOWNER REHAB EMERGENCY & MINOR REPAIR 2025 14A LMH $23,940.00 2025 2 378 7181553 HOMEOWNER REHAB EMERGENCY & MINOR REPAIR 2025 14A LMH $22,450.00 14A Matrix Code $384,100.80
2024 10 364 7081044 AP24 HOUS REHAB ACTIVITY DELIVERY 14H LMH $9,912.21 14H Matrix Code $9,912.21
Total $832,870.43
LINE 27 DETAIL: ACTIVm ES INCLUDED IN THE COMPUTATION OF LINE 27 Activity to
prevent,
Plan IDIS IDIS Voucher prepare for, Act" ·ty N Grant Number Fund Matrix National Year Project Activity Number and respond iv, ame Type Code Objective to
Coronavirus Drawn Amount
2024 7 359 7080916 No PUBLIC SERVICES - Homeless Point-in-Time Count/ LINC-KTHA/COC B24MC060061 Pl 03T LMC $769.98 AP24 2024 7 359 7080918 No PUBLIC SERVICES - Homeless Point-in-Time Count/ LINC-KTHA/COC B24MC060061 Pl 03T LMC $901.21 AP24 2025 3 376 7147029 No PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS TULARE COC -PIT and Hanford LINC B25MC060061 EN 03T LMC $836.19 2025 3 376 7147030 No PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS TULARE COC -PIT and Hanford LINC B25MC060061 EN 03T LMC $638.96 2025 3 376 7147031 No PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS TULARE COC -PIT and Hanford LINC B25MC060061 EN 03T LMC $775.52 2025 3 376 7147032 No PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS TULARE COC -PIT and Hanford LINC B25MC060061 EN 03T LMC $746.18 2025 3 376 7147033 No PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS TULARE COC -PIT and Hanford LINC B25MC060061 EN 03T LMC $667.38 2025 3 376 7147035 No PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS TULARE COC -PIT and Hanford LINC B25MC060061 EN 03T LMC $730.79 2025 3 376 7147037 No PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS TULARE COC -PIT and Hanford LINC B25MC060061 EN 03T LMC $816.99 2025 3 376 7147038 No PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS TULARE COC -PIT and Hanford LINC B25MC060061 EN 03T LMC $728.42 2025 3 376 7147042 No PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS TULARE COC -PIT and Hanford LINC B25MC060061 EN 03T LMC $685.41 2025 3 376 7181554 No PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS TULARE COC -PIT and Hanford LINC B25MC060061 Pl 03T LMC $2,313.13 2025 3 376 7181555 No PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS TULARE COC -PIT and Hanford LINC B25MC060061 Pl 03T LMC $1,061.03 2025 4 377 7147056 No PUBLIC SERVICES - UNHOUSED PERSONS PROGRAMS -KCAO B24MC060061 Pl 03T LMC $3,949.32 2025 4 377 7147060 No PUBLIC SERVICES - UNHOUSED PERSONS PROGRAMS -KCAO B24MC060061 Pl 03T LMC $6,713.43 2025 4 377 7147062 No PUBLIC SERVICES - UNHOUSED PERSONS PROGRAMS -KCAO B24MC060061 Pl 03T LMC $3,168.07 2025 4 377 7147063 No PUBLIC SERVICES - UNHOUSED PERSONS PROGRAMS -KCAO B24MC060061 Pl 03T LMC $2,888.84 2025 4 377 7147064 No PUBLIC SERVICES - UNHOUSED PERSONS PROGRAMS -KCAO B24MC060061 Pl 03T LMC $2,759.76 2025 4 377 7147066 No PUBLIC SERVICES - UNHOUSED PERSONS PROGRAMS -KCAO B24MC060061 Pl 03T LMC $560.58 03T Matrix Code $31,711.19
2025 3 375 7147051 No PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS COMMISSION ON AGING MEAL PROG AP25 B25MC060061 EN 05A LMC $5,000.00 2025 3 375 7147053 No PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS COMMISSION ON AGING MEAL PROG AP25 B25MC060061 EN 05A LMC $5,000.00 2025 3 375 7181559 No PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS COMMISSION ON AGING MEAL PROG AP25 B25MC060061 Pl 05A LMC $5,000.00

_q•"'Tio . ..,\ Office of Community Planning and Development DATE: 08-27-26 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development TIME: 15:15 ~ * 111
111
1 * i
Integrated Disbursement and Information System PAGE: 4
t I II Ii PR26 - CDBG Financial Summary Report
G,~6"11\1 QE',/~1,.0~ Program Year 2025

HANFORD, CA
Activity to
prevent,
Plan IDIS IDIS Voucher prepare for, Act· ·ty N Grant Number Fund Matrix National Year Project Activity Number and respond IVI ame Type Code Objective to
Coronavirus Drawn Amount
2025 3 375 7181561 No PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS COMMISSION ON AGING MEAL PROG AP25 B25MC060061 Pl 05A LMC $5,000.00 2025 3 375 7181564 No PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS COMMISSION ON AGING MEAL PROG AP25 B25MC060061 Pl 05A LMC $5,000.00 2025 3 375 7186067 No PUBLIC SERVICES-KINGS COMMISSION ON AGING MEAL PROG AP25 B25MC060061 Pl 05A LMC $5,328.77 OSA Matrix Code $30,328.77
2025 6 374 7181557 No PUBLIC SERVICE - FAIR HOUSING PROGRAM -CSET B25MC060061 Pl 05) LMC $2,781.17 OSJ Matrix Code $2,781.17
2025 8 380 7189458 No YOUTH AND SENIOR COMMUNITY RECREATION PROGRAM AP25 B25MC060061 Pl 0SL LMC $9,020.00 OSL Matrix Code $9,020.00
2025 3 372 7181560 No PUBLIC SERVICES SUBSTINENCE PAYMENTS -KINGS COMMISSION ON B25MC060061 Pl 0SQ LMC $12,003.99 AGING (2025) 2025 3 372 7181563 No PUBLIC SERVICES SUBSTINENCE PAYMENTS -KINGS COMMISSION ON B25MC060061 Pl 0SQ LMC $801.62 AGING (2025) 2025 3 372 7186507 No PUBLIC SERVICES SUBSTINENCE PAYMENTS -KINGS COMMISSION ON B25MC060061 Pl 0SQ LMC $310.14 AGING (2025) 2025 3 372 7186515 No PUBLIC SERVICES SUBSTINENCE PAYMENTS -KINGS COMMISSION ON B25MC060061 Pl 0SQ LMC $1,555.48 AGING (2025) OSQ Matrix Code $14,671.23
No Activity to prevent, prepare for, and respond to Coronavirus $88,512.36 Total $88,512.36
LINE 37 DETAIL: ACTIVITTES INCLUDED IN THE COMPUTATION OF LINE 37 Plan IDIS IDIS Voucher Activity Name Matrix National
Year Project Activity Number Code Objective Drawn Amount 2025 1 379 7125972 ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING AP2025 21A $30,943.97 2025 379 7125973 ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING AP2025 21A $1,804.71 2025 379 7125974 ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING AP2025 21A $30,094.25 2025 379 7147027 ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING AP2025 21A $29,811.01 2025 379 7186074 ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING AP2025 21A $35,546.62 21A Matrix Code $128,200.56
Total $128,200.56
One additional COBG Administration draw may occur before finalization; therefore, Administration expenditures reflected in the draft PR-26 are subject to change.

Attachment E-2:

PR-26 CDHG Activity Summary Report
PR26 - Acti vity Summary by Selected Grant
Date Generated: 08/27/2026
Grantee: HANFORD
Grant Year: 2025
Formula and Comoetitive Grants onlv
Total Grant Amount for CDBG 2025 Grant vear B25MC060061 Grant Number "' $523,508.00 State I Grantee
I
Grant
I Grant Activity
1M•~•1 National
I
IOIS 1
1 Activitytopr evenl, J Activity Amount Funded Amount Drawn % of COBG Drawn Total COBG Funded Total COBG Drawn Name Year Number Group Code Objective Activity prepare for, and Status From Selected Grant From Selected Grant From Selected Amount Amount respond to Coronavirus Grant/Grant (All Years All Sources) (Ail Years All Sources CA /HANFORD !2025 IB25MC06006L AdmlnlstTativeAnd Planning l21A I 1379 I No IOpen 104701.00 104 701.00 $155,516.60 $128,200.56 Total Administra tive And Pfannlna $104 ,701.00 $104 ,701.00 20.00 % $1 55,516.60 $128,200.56 CA IHANFORD 12025 !B25MC060061 Housina h◄A ILMH 1378 I No IOpen $150 807.00 $72 509.00 $287,984.71 $159,-43-4.86 Tota l Housing $150,807.00 $72 ,509.00 13.850/a $287,984.71 $159,434 ,815 CA HANFORD 12025 IB25MC060061 Public imorovements IOJC LMC 373 No Open U 83302.57 U 37◄68.23 $196,179.40 $150,345.06 [Tota l Public Improvements $183 ,302.57 $13 7,468.23 26,260/a $196,179.40 $150,345.06 CA !HANFORD 12025 l825MC060061 Public Services I03T ILMC 1376 I No IOpeo $6 625.&4 $6,625.8◄ $10,000.00 $10,000.00 CA IHANFORD 12025 1B25MC060061 Public Services IOSA ILMC 1375 I No !Open $1000 0.00 $10 000.00 $30,328.77 $30,328.77 CA !HANFORD 12025 1B25MC060061 rubuc sevices 1051 LMC 137◄ I No Opeo sro 218.83 $0.00 $13,000.00 $2,781.17 CA !HANFORD 12025 ]825MC060061 Public Services IOSQ ILMC 1372 I No !Open SO.OD $0.00 $11,671.23 $11,671.23 Non CARES Related Public Se rvices $26,844 ,67 $16,625.84 3.18% $68,00 0.00 $57,781.17 Tota l 2025 $4 65,655.24 $3 31,304 ,07 63.29% $707,68 0.71 $4 95,761.65 GnondT- - -.ess.24 U.31.304.07 63.29 ... t 707 AD. 71 &415761.65

1 RESOLUTION NO. 26-55-R

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HANFORD

APPROVING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT

CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION REPORT
FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2025-2026

At a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford duly called and held on September 15, 2026, upon motion of Council Member _____________, and seconded by Council Member _____________, and carried, the following resolution was adopted:

WHEREAS, the City of Hanford opted to become an Entitlement Community within the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program in November 2003, allowing the City to receive an allocation directly from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) each year; and
WHEREAS, the $523,508 in annual funds are to be used to benefit low- to moderate-income households and neighborhoods in the elimination or prevention of slum and blight for such programs as housing rehabilitation, affordable homeownership assistance, neighborhood improvement, community services, as well as community development activities such as the construction or rehabilitation of community infrastructure and facilities and economic development; and
WHEREAS, the Consolidated Plan serves as the City's application for CDBG funds and sets forth the priorities and strategies to address the needs

2 of primarily low and moderate-income persons and areas in the City over five years; and
WHEREAS, the annual Action Plan allocates one year's funding (entitlement and program income) to specific projects and activities for the CDBG program and
WHEREAS, the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report is an end-of-year report prepared to assess the success of meeting the goals and objectives stated in the annual Action Plan and Consolidated Plan.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council adopt the Community Development Block Grant Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report for Program Year 2025-2026 (Exhibit A).

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford, duly called and held on the 15th day of September 2026 by the following votes:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBER

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBER

3 ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBER
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBER

APPROVED:

Mayor
Attest:

City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF KINGS ) ss

CITY OF HANFORD )

I, NATALIE CORRAL, City Clerk of the City of Hanford, do hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Hanford at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15 th day of September 2026.

Dated:

Natale Corral, City Clerk

13.B.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 9/15/2026 AGENDA SECTION: PUBLIC HEARING

SUBJECT:

First reading of Ordinance 26-06 to grant the City Manager authorization to accept, on behalf of the governing body, streets and roads or portions thereof, into the city street system and to record conveyances to the city of real property interests for street and road uses and purposes.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends that City Council waive the first reading of Ordinance 26-06 to grant the City Manager authorization to accept, on behalf of the governing body, streets and roads or portions thereof, into the city street system and to record conveyances to the city of real property interests for street and road uses and purposes.

Recommended Motion:

I move to waive the first reading of Ordinance 26-06 to grant the City Manager authorization to accept, on behalf of the governing body, streets and roads or portions thereof, into the city street system and to record conveyances to the city of real property interests for street and road uses and purposes.

Summary:

At present, the City Council must accept roads into the city street system by adoption of resolutions as needed, based on project-specific conditions. California Street and Highways Code Section 1806(c) states that the governing body of a city may, by ordinance, designate a city officer to accept, on behalf of the governing body, streets and roads or portions thereof, into the city street system and to record conveyances to the city of real property interests for street and road uses and purposes.

City staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to exercise acceptance authority per California Street and Highways Code Section 1806(c) since Hanford Municipal Code Section 2.08.060.K. allows the City Manager to perform such duties and exercise such powers as may be delegated to the City Manager from time to time by ordinance or resolution of the City Council.

City staff is scheduled to return to City Council for the second reading and adoption of Ordinance 26- 06 on October 6, 2026.

Background:

The proposed Ordinance would eliminate the need for staff to seek separate City Council actions to accept streets and roads or portions thereof, into the city street system and to record conveyances to the City of real property interests for street and road uses and purposes. This change would reduce the amount of staff time involved in preparing staff reports, thereby reducing delays in overall project deliverables.

The City Council and Planning Commission will retain approval authority for development projects as currently identified in the City’s Municipal Code. Additionally, dedications on any final map or parcel map will continue to be approved by the City Council in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act.

This procedural change is proposed as an effort to streamline the City of Hanford's process of acceptance of streets and roads or portions thereof into the city street system and to record conveyances of real property interests for street and road purposes ministerially. The primary objectives are to improve operational efficiency, reduce project turnaround times, and optimize the use of staff time and resources.

While this ordinance will allow the City Manager to accept dedications into the City Street System, in order for the City Manager to accept other types of dedications, both in fee and as easements, a resolution (proposed at this same Council meeting) will also need to be adopted.

Environmental Review:

This action is not a project within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines §§ 15378 and 15061(b)(3) as it proposes an organizational structure change that will not result in any direct or indirect physical change in the environment.

Prior Council Action:

N/A
Prior Planning Commission Action:

N/A
Fiscal Impact:

N/A
STRATEGIC GOAL: Indicates which City Strategic Goal(s) this item supports.

Check all that apply.

☐
Quality of
Life
☐
Community
Engagement
☐
Fiscal
Sustainability
☐
Efficient &
High
Performing
Government

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Ordinance 26-06

ORDINANCE NO. 26-06

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HANFORD, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE CITY MANAGERS’ AUTHORIZATION TO ACCEPT, ON BEHALF OF THE

GOVERNING BODY, STREETS AND ROADS OR PORTIONS THEREOF, INTO THE CITY

STREET SYSTEM AND TO RECORD CONVEYANCES TO THE CITY OF REAL PROPERTY

INTERESTS FOR STREET AND ROAD USES AND PURPOSES

WHEREAS, pursuing practices that improve efficiency saves the City of Hanford valuable resources; and
WHEREAS, currently the City Council of the City of Hanford accepts streets and roads or portions thereof into the city street system on a project-by-project basis; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 2.08.060(K) the City Manager may exercise authority delegated by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the California Street and Highways Code Section 1806(c) states that the governing body of a city may, by ordinance, designate a city officer to accept, on behalf of the governing body, streets and roads or portions thereof, into the city street system and to record conveyances to the city of real property interests for street and road uses and purposes; and WHEREAS, by delegating authority to the City Manager to accept streets and roads or portions thereof into the city street system, the City Council would improve efficiency, save staff time and have a positive impact on the City’s resources.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the City Council of the City of Hanford as follows:

Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 2. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to accept streets and roads or portions thereof, into the city street system and to record conveyances to the city of real property interests for street and road uses and purposes.

Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption and shall be published once in the Hanford Sentinel within fifteen (15) days after its passage or a summary of this ordinance shall be published in the Hanford Sentinel in a manner consistent with the requirements of the California Government Code.

Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford, duly called and held on October 6, 2026, by the following roll call vote:

AYES: ___________________________________________________________________ NOES:___________________________________________________________________

ABSTAIN: _______________________________________________________________ ABSENT: ________________________________________________________________ Approved

_______________________

MARK KAIRIS
MAYOR of the City of Hanford

Attest:

NATALIE CORRAL

CITY CLERK

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF KINGS )

CITY OF HANFORD )

I, Natalie Corral, City Clerk of the City of Hanford, do hereby certify the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hanford held on the 6th day of October, 2026.

Date:

City Clerk

14.A.

AGENDA

STAFF REPORT

MEETING DATE: 9/15/2026 AGENDA SECTION: GENERAL BUSINESS

SUBJECT:

Staff presentation regarding the preliminary draft Objective Design Standards and Council input on the proposed standards and next steps

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommendation: Receive a staff presentation regarding the preliminary draft Objective Design Standards and provide input on the proposed standards and next steps.

BACKGROUND:

The City is preparing Objective Design Standards as part of a broader planning effort funded through the Regional Early Action Planning Grants Program (REAP 2.0) administered by the Kings County Association of Governments. The project also includes preparation of an Environmental Justice Element and an update to the City's Subdivision Ordinance. The City retained Mintier Harnish to assist with this work.

Objective Design Standards establish clear and measurable design requirements that can be applied without relying on personal or subjective judgment. The standards are intended to provide greater predictability for applicants, staff, Council, and the public while helping new residential development reflect the City's design expectations.

Discussion

Staff and the consultant have reviewed the City's existing requirements, evaluated standards used by other jurisdictions, and prepared an initial working draft for discussion. Staff has also focused on concerns previously raised regarding the appearance and livability of compact and small-lot residential development, including privacy, building massing, parking, garage prominence, pedestrian access, and streetscape design.

The draft standards presented with this item are preliminary. They are being provided at this stage so that the City Council can review the general direction of the work and identify concerns before the document is fully refined, reformatted, and prepared for formal review and adoption. The draft should not be viewed as a final policy document, and staff is not requesting line-by-line approval of the proposed language.

The preliminary draft addresses several categories, including:
• Applicability of the standards and their relationship to the Hanford Municipal Code;

• Site planning, neighborhood compatibility, pedestrian circulation, streetscape design, walls, fencing, and common areas;
• Building orientation, architectural articulation, upper-floor massing, and privacy considerations; • Parking layout, guest parking where on-street parking is restricted, garage frontage, and the treatment of porte cochère; and
• Additional standards for small-lot single-family development, including front-yard paving, building separation, upper-story design, and pedestrian improvements.

Several provisions remain under review and will likely be revised after the Council discussion.

Graphics will also be restored or updated in the next draft to illustrate the standards where an image will make the requirement easier to understand and administer. The consultant will continue reviewing the draft to ensure that the requirements are written as objective, measurable standards.

Implementation of the Objective Design Standards will also require corresponding amendments to the City’s Zoning Ordinance. Certain existing development requirements, including setbacks and other dimensional standards, will need to be modified to accommodate the proposed standards and intended small-lot residential development patterns. Staff is still developing these amendments, and no Zoning Ordinance changes are proposed for approval as part of this informational item. The necessary amendments will be presented through the formal review and adoption process following the final Objective Design Standards.

Council Input

Staff seeks input from Council input on the following:
• Whether the overall level of design regulation is appropriate for new residential development in Hanford;
• Whether the small-lot standards adequately address privacy, building separation, upper-floor massing, and neighborhood appearance;
• Whether the proposed parking, garage, guest parking, sidewalk, and streetscape standards strike an appropriate balance between design quality and feasibility; • Whether any proposed standards appear unnecessary; and • Whether there are additional design issues or outcomes the Council would like staff and the consultant to address in the next draft.

Council comments will be treated as input for further drafting. Because no adoption is proposed, the Council is not being asked to approve the preliminary standards or commit the City to any particular provision.

Next Steps

Following this presentation, staff and the consultant will revise the draft based on Council input, complete additional technical review, refine the organization and graphics, and prepare a more complete version for review. The current anticipated process is:
• Revise the preliminary standards based on Council input and continued staff and consultant review;
• Prepare a clean, more complete draft for Planning Commission review, anticipated for October 27, 2026;

• Make any additional revisions following the Planning Commission meeting; and • Return to the City Council at a later meeting for formal consideration of the final Objective Design Standards
FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no direct fiscal impact associated with receiving the presentation and providing input.

Preparation of the Objective Design Standards is funded through the City's REAP 2.0 planning grant.

STRATEGIC GOAL: Indicates which City Strategic Goal(s) this item supports.

Check all that apply.

☐
Quality of
Life
☐
Community
Engagement
☐
Fiscal
Sustainability
☐
Efficient &
High
Performing
Government

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Draft Objective Design Standards

CITY OF HANFORD
Objective Design Standards

TABLE OF CONTENTS

3 1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose and Goals

The City of Hanford Objective Design Standards provide objective requirements for the design of single-family residential development. These Objective Design Standards will ensure that new development creates buildings and landscapes that are in keeping with the physical and architectural character of Hanford. Unlike design guidelines, objective design standards are written to have no personal or subjective judgment. In other words, the goal of these objective design standards is to provide a clear and straight forward application and approval process for single family housing construction in the city.

1.2 User Guide

This document contains objective design standards for five topic areas. These areas, and the developments to which they apply, include:

1. Site Design
The standards in this section apply to all single-family residential development projects.

2. Building Design
The standards in this section apply to all single-family residential development projects.

3. Landscaping and Lighting
The standards in this section apply to all single-family residential development projects.

4. Neighborhood Design
The standards in this section apply to single-family residential subdivisions and neighborhoods.

While standards in the first three sections apply to individual houses within subdivisions, these standards govern larger circulation, landscaping, open spaces and other features of entire neighborhoods. They do not apply to the development of single sites.

5. Small Lot Design
The standards in this section apply to lots from 3,200 sqft. to 4,999 sqft.

4 All individual topics or subtopics begin with a design intent statement, followed by specific standards. The intent statements are provided to help the reader understand the overarching principle behind the standard requirements and do not serve as review criteria.

A checklist listing the objective design standard requirements is provided in the appendix of this document. This checklist should be filled out by the applicant and reviewed by staff to indicate whether the applicant’s project meets the requirements for non-discretionary staff review.

1.3 Relationship to State and City Regulations

The following describes how these objective design standards relate to and comply with State and City regulations:

General Plan. The Hanford General Plan includes the goal of providing opportunities for achieving quality design and improving “quality of life through use of practical design principles and standards.”

“The visual aesthetics of places, both natural and manmade, contribute to the identity of a community. Through community design, Hanford can build and sustain an urban fabric that strengthens its assets and strives to bring coherence and an ongoing identity to this growing community. High-quality design contributes to memorable, vibrant places where people enjoy spending time.”
Hanford General Plan, 3.10 Community Design

Zoning Ordinance. All development must comply with the regulations within the City of Hanford’s Zoning Ordinance. These objective design standards are applicable to new SFR housing built on parcels in Districts in which single-family development is permitted, each of which is identified and described further in the City’s Zoning Ordinance.

Applicability to Accessory Structures. Accessory structures, including accessory dwelling units, garages, workshops, and storage structures, shall comply with the applicable provisions of these Objective Design Standards. Where these standards conflict with state law or the City’s adopted accessory dwelling unit regulations, state law and the applicable provisions of the Hanford Municipal Code shall control.

5 Historic Resources Permits. Buildings and structures listed on a local, State, or national historic register shall be subject to the City’s applicable historic preservation requirements. Where those requirements conflict with these Objective Design Standards, the historic-preservation requirements shall control.

Building and Fire Code Applicability. Compliance with these Objective Design Standards does not supersede or waive any requirement of the California Building Standards Code, California Fire Code, or any local amendments adopted by the City. All projects shall comply with applicable building, residential, fire, accessibility, energy, and green building requirements. Approval under these standards does not constitute approval of a building permit, fire permit, or related construction permit. If an irreconcilable conflict exists, the applicable building or fire code requirement shall control.

1.4 Review Process

Only applicants with projects on sites on the Hanford Zoning Map where SFR is permitted by-right can apply for ministerial design review. As demonstrated by the following summaries, the SFR project review process depends on the type of project, the property status and associated subdivision actions.

• Single Family Residential on already subdivided parcel. Applicants for projects that do not require map processing shall submit plans directly to the Community Development Department. Concurrent with the Community Development Department’s review, the application will be routed to other City departments for review of compliance with these objective design standards and the city’s Zoning Ordinance. Such projects are ministerial and exempt from CEQA.

• Residential Subdivision. Applicants for residential subdivisions shall submit plans to the city, which will be routed to various departments for entitlements and subdivision map processing.

Individual units of such projects shall be reviewed for compliance with these objective design standards during entitlements phase, alongside evaluation for conformance with the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. Such projects require CEQA review, possibly in the form of Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report (EIR).

6 Exceptions from Objective Design Standards. A project that complies with all applicable objective standards shall be processed ministerially when required by state law. A request to deviate from one or more Objective Design Standards shall be processed as a Variance or Planned Unit Development in accordance with the procedures applicable to variances established by the Hanford Municipal Code.

An application for minor deviation shall identify each standard from which an exception is requested and shall include plans, elevations, photographs, and other information demonstrating the proposed alternative design.

If a project does not meet one or more of the objective design standards, the applicant can amend their application to comply, or when appropriate, the City of Hanford’s Community Development Director can administratively approve minor deviations (e.g., when the applicant can demonstrate that site design/layout would be improved or that there is a constraint that would make complying with a standard infeasible given site layout, etc.) from the objective design standards.

The Community Development Director may approve an exception only when it finds that:

1. The alternative design provides an architectural or site-design feature that serves the purpose of the standard from which the exception is requested;

2. The exception is necessary because of the dimensions, configuration, existing improvements, easements, or physical conditions of the property; and

3. The exception will not create a greater impact on adjoining properties than would result from strict compliance with the standard.

Decisions on exceptions may be appealed in accordance with the appeal procedures established by the Hanford Municipal Code. The expiration, extension, and revocation of an approved exception shall be governed by the provisions applicable to variances.

For deviations not deemed minor, the applicant can choose to proceed with a variance or Planned Unit Development (PUD), as applicable. The project will still be reviewed for conformance with the Objective Design Standards by the Planning Commission while taking into consideration whether the deviation(s) from the standards is appropriate.

7 2. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
All residential development shall comply with the applicable development standards of the Hanford Municipal Code, including requirements for lot dimensions, setbacks, building height, parking, and accessory structures. Applicants shall refer to the standards for the applicable zoning district. The Objective Design Standards in this document are supplemental to the Hanford Municipal Code and do not replace or supersede its requirements or any state or federal requirements.

8 3. OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS

3.1 Site Design Standards
The following standards apply to individual single-family lots, developed individually or as part of a subdivision.

3.1.1 Building and Driveway Orientation
GOAL: Provide visually interesting residential streetscapes with open, pedestrian character.

Standard 3.1.1.A Orientation to Street
The main elevation of single-family homes shall face the primary public or private street on which the lot is located. In addition, the main entry to single-family homes shall also be located on the elevation facing the primary public or private street.

Standard 3.1.1.B Access to Main Entry
A minimum four-foot wide pedestrian walkway, other than the driveway, shall provide direct access from the sidewalk to the main entry.

Standard 3.1.1.C Corner-Lot Orientation
On a corner lot, the primary elevation shall be the elevation containing the main entrance and facing the street associated with the property address.

3.1.2 Context Sensitivity
GOAL: Preservation of privacy, provision of light and air and reduced impacts of bulk and mass on adjacent single-family homes.

Standard 3.1.2.A Off-parallel window placement
Upper-floor windows facing dwellings within 15 feet of the property line shall be offset by a minimum of twelve inches, as measured from the window frame, from the adjacent property window frame to avoid direct view into adjacent properties.

9 3.1.3 Off-Street Parking Facilities
GOAL: Provide durable and visually compatible parking facilities that comply with the City’s parking requirements.

Standard 3.1.3.A Required Parking
The number, dimensions, and configuration of required off-street parking spaces shall comply with the applicable provisions of the Hanford Municipal Code.

Standard 3.1.3.B Covered Parking
Required covered parking spaces shall be located within a fully enclosed garage. A porte cochere may be provided in addition to the required covered parking but shall not satisfy a requirement for an enclosed garage. A porte cochere may encroach into the otherwise applicable front-yard setback but shall be located no closer than 10 feet from the front property line. The setback shall be measured from the front property line to the nearest portion of the porte cochere, including its roof edge and supporting columns.

Standard 3.1.3.C Parking Surfaces
Driveways and other approved uncovered parking areas shall be paved with concrete, asphalt, permeable pavers, or another permanent all-weather surface permitted by the City’s adopted engineering standards.

3.2 Building Design Standards
The following standards apply to individual single-family lots, developed individually or as part of a subdivision.

3.2.1  Massing and Articulation
GOAL: Design homes that avoid bulky, monolithic or messy appearance through various points of visual interest and coordinated external elements.

Elevations
Standard 3.2.1.A Front Elevation Massing
Building elevations on which the main entry is located shall include at least two of the following massing strategies, compliant with the associated standards:

10 1. Single Floor Projection. A façade projection on the lower or upper floor that projects at least one foot from the main wall plane, with a total area of at least 80 feet and capped by a gable, eave or other roof form.

2. Multi-Floor Projection. A façade projection extending from ground level to the upper floor ceiling that projects at least one foot from the main wall plane, with a total area of at least 124 feet, and capped by a gable or other roof form.

3. Massing Break. A projection or recess of at least two feet from the adjacent wall plane that extends from ground level to the upper-floor ceiling. The projection or recess shall separate primary façade elements, such as the main entry, garage, or major window groupings.

4. Bay Window. A protruding window, such as a bay window, which is at least two feet in depth.

5. Contrasting Materials or Finish on Floors. Application of siding, panels or materials that vary from the primary exterior finish, to at least 40% of the total elevation area of one story of the building. All materials shall comply with standards in Section 3.2.4 Design Detail.

Standard 3.2.1.B Street-Facing Side Elevations
A building elevation facing a public or private street, other than the primary elevation, shall incorporate at least two of the following features:

1. A wall projection or recess at least one foot deep and five feet wide;

2. A change in roof height, roof form, or roof orientation;

3. A gable or dormer;

4. A minimum of one window for each 15 feet of elevation width;

5. A bay window projecting at least one foot from the wall plane;

6. A decorative trellis at least five feet wide;

7. A balcony at least three feet deep and five feet wide; or

8. An accent material covering at least 20 percent of the street-facing side elevation.

A single architectural feature shall not satisfy more than one of the required elements.

11 3.2.2 Entryways
GOAL: Create visually prominent and accessible entries that contribute to building design and neighborhood character.

Standard 3.2.2.A Porch or Recessed Entryway Requirement Main entryways shall incorporate a porch, recessed entryway, or a combination of porch and recessed entryway.

Standard 3.2.2.B Porch Standards
Main entryway porches shall comply with the following:

1. Area. Porches shall include a covered area that extends 4-10 feet from the wall plane on which the door is located and have a minimum area of 36 square feet. If combined with a recessed entry, the total area of recess and porch shall have a minimum area of 36 square feet.

2. Height. Porch roofs shall have maximum height of 12 feet.

Standard 3.2.2.C Recessed Entry Standards
Recessed entryways shall comply with the following:

1. Depth. Recessed entries shall be recessed at least two feet from the wall plane on which the door is located to create a covered landing area.

2. Overhang. Recessed entries shall include an eave or roof form at least six feet wide that extends at least two feet from the main wall plane.

3.2.3 Garage Size and Form
GOAL: Ensure that garages and garage openings do not dominate the design of residential frontages.

Standard 3.2.3.A Design Sensitive Approach
All garages shall be designed and located to limit their visual presence, using one of the following techniques:

1. Design sensitive front garage. Garages located at the front building elevation shall comply with the following standards:
a. The width shall not exceed 60 percent of the total width of the front elevation of the building.
b. The garage shall be prohibited from projecting from the surrounding wall plane.

12 c. The garage shall include either 1) an overhang at least 12 inches deep with the same materials and color palette as the primary roof form, or 2) a recess of at least 12 inches from the surrounding wall plane.

2. Side accessible attached garage. Such garages shall be located a minimum of 12 feet behind the main elevation of the home.

Standard 3.2.2.B Complementary Garage Door Design
The color and design of all garage doors shall vary from the immediately adjacent wall plane and shall match colors used on exterior details of the home.

3.2.4 Design Details
GOAL: Promote materials, finishes and colors that increase the visual quality of individual homes and public frontages.

Materials
Standard 3.2.4.A Appropriate Building Materials
Appropriate building materials include:

1. Brick, rock, and stone, or a veneer of these materials

2. Smooth troweled stucco

3. Poured in place concrete

4. Cementitious board

5. Glass

6. Plaster or stucco

7. Ceramic tiles (as a secondary material)

8. Slate tiles

9. Stainless Steel

10. Finished and painted wood trim

11. Wood, aluminum, copper, steel, and vinyl clad frames for windows and doors Standard 3.2.4.B Prohibited Materials
The following materials shall be prohibited from use on finishes:

1. Plywood

2. Vinyl siding

3. Plastic or vinyl

13 Standard 3.2.4.C Exterior Material Wrapping
Decorative material and design treatments used on front elevations shall extend to the fence line on each side elevation, at a minimum.

Color
Standard 3.2.4.E Limit
Each dwelling shall use at least two but no more than five exterior colors and/or materials, including tints, shades, or tones, including body, trim, and accent colors.

Standard 3.2.4.F Subdivision Color Variety
A residential subdivision containing five or more dwelling units shall provide at least three exterior color schemes. The following requirements shall apply:

1. A single color scheme shall not be used on more than 40 percent of the dwelling units.

2. Each color scheme shall contain no more than five colors.

3. The same color scheme shall not be used on adjacent dwelling units.

4. Dwelling units located directly across a street from one another shall not use the same color scheme.

3.2.5 Windows
GOAL: Provide windows that provide well-proportioned articulation to building façades while adding visual interest, scale and character.

Standard 3.2.5.A Window Perimeter
All windows shall include one of the following perimeter design details:

1. Trim at least two inches wide around the entire window; or

2. A minimum two-inch recess from the surrounding exterior wall plan

14 Standard 3.2.5.B Front Window Detail
Windows located on front building façades shall be articulated with at least one of the following details, in addition to trim requirements in Standard 3.3.5.1.1:

1. Sills

2. Kickers

3. Shutters

4. Awnings
Standard 3.2.5.C Shutter Proportions
Where shutters are provided, each pair of shutters shall:

1. Match the shape of the associated window;

2. Have a combined width equal to between 100 and 105 percent of the window opening; and

3. Be mounted in a location and orientation that represents operable shutters in the open position.

3.2.6 Roofs
GOAL: Design rooflines that contribute to visual interest, neighborhood character and durability of the home.

Roof Form
Standard 3.2.6.A Street Fronting Roofline
Roof surfaces that face front property lines and are wider than 30 feet shall be vertically articulated at least once every 30 feet, with at least one of the following techniques:

1. A change in height of at least four feet

2. Use of a roof dormer

3. A change in roof orientation

4. A change in roof form that projects at least three feet above the main roofline.

Standard 3.2.6.B Roof Consistency
Roof styles and materials shall be consistent on all building elevations.

15 3.3 Landscaping and Lighting Standards
The following standards shall apply to individual single-family lots and structures.

3.3.1  Front Yard Landscaping
GOAL: Ensure that front yards are defined by well-maintained landscaping and plantings that enhance residential buildings and visible outdoor spaces.

Standard 3.3.1.A Required Coverage
Pavement and other hardscape, including walkways and driveways, shall not occupy more than 50 percent of the required front-yard area. All portions of required front yards, except those occupied by walkways and allowable motor vehicle parking and storage areas, shall be landscaped according to the following standards:

1. No more than 25 percent inorganic ground cover, including decomposed granite, decorative pavers and river rock.

2. Gravel surfaces are prohibited in all front yard areas except for secondary pathways less than 4’ wide.

Standard 3.3.1.B Design Diversity
Front-yard landscaping shall include at least 20 percent ground-cover plantings and at least 20 percent shrubs, calculated based on the total number of plants installed. At least one tree shall be provided for each 1,500 square feet of required landscaped area or fraction thereof.

Standard 3.3.1.C Utility Screening
All utility appurtenances such as transformers and generators that cannot be undergrounded or located in side or rear yards shall be screened with one of the following:

1. Use of shrubs or plantings at least as tall as the utility appurtenance on a minimum of three sides of the utility, including the side(s) of the utility facing a public or private street.

Shrubs or plantings shall not prevent access to the utility.

2. Screening at least as tall as the utility appurtenance on a minimum of three sides of the utility, including the side(s) of the utility facing a public or private street. The screening shall be composed of at least one color and/or material used on the home and shall not prevent access to the utility.

16 3.3.2  Plantings
GOAL: Compose landscapes with diverse, robust plant types that are well-integrated into other components of site design.

Standard 3.3.2.A Planting Size
All proposed shrubs, excluding ground cover plantings, shall be a minimum five-gallon in size.

3.3.3  Walls and Fences
GOAL: Provide walls and fences that are durable and appealing design components rather than monolithic barriers.

Standard 3.3.3.A Prohibited Materials
The following fencing materials are prohibited:

1. Barbed or razor wire;

2. Electrically charged fencing;

3. Corrugated metal, fiberglass, or plastic panels; and

4. Chain-link fencing visible from a public or private street.

Chain-link fencing may be used when it is not visible from a street or when it is limited to a gate providing access to an interior side or rear yard.

Standard 3.3.3.B Trash Storage Enclosure
Single family lots shall include a location for the storage of trash receptacles which is screened from public view by a fence or architectural enclosure that includes at least one material or color found on the primary residential structure.

Standard 3.3.3.C Trash Storage Access
All trash storage enclosures shall be made accessible by a minimum three-foot wide paved pathway from the enclosure to the front driveway or other paved area of the front yard.

3.3.4  Exterior Lighting
GOAL: Provide outdoor lighting that increases residential safety without impacting adjacent properties or rights-of-way
Standard 3.3.4.A Downward Facing Requirement
All building- and ground-mounted lighting shall be located and fully shielded so that no light is emitted above a 90-degree angle.

17 Standard 3.3.4.B Entryway Lighting
The front porch, landing or other recessed entryway shall include an exterior lighting fixture within three feet of the entryway. Standard 3.3.4.C Inappropriate Lighting No permanently-installed outdoor lights that blink, revolve, or flash shall be permitted.

Standard 3.3.4.D Required Lighting Locations
At least one exterior lighting fixture shall be located within three feet of each exterior pedestrian gate and within three feet of the pedestrian walkway connecting the main entry to the public sidewalk.

Standard 3.3.4.E Fixture Height and Color Temperature
Ground-mounted fixtures used to illuminate driveways, landscaping, or pedestrian pathways shall not exceed three feet in height. Permanently installed exterior lighting shall use light-emitting diodes or another energy-efficient source having a correlated color temperature not exceeding 3,000 Kelvin.

3.4 Neighborhood Design Standards
The following standards shall apply to the design of subdivisions and other complete residential neighborhoods with new rights-of-way. These standards shall be used in conjunction with the City’s adopted improvement standards.

3.4.1  Entries and Edges
GOAL: Provide neighborhood entryways and edges that introduce neighborhood character and create friendly neighborhood access.

Entry Drive
At least one entry into the residential neighborhood shall be developed as an Grand-entry design with the following features:

Standard 3.4.1.A Entry Drive Design
The Arterial Entry Drive shall use at least two of the following design elements:

1. All neighborhood identification signs shall comply with Chapter 17.56 of the Hanford Municipal Code and applicable City sight-distance requirements.

2. Two to three foot tall architectural monument sign composed of stone, brick, or wood.

18 3. Textured, colored or stamped roadway paving from the neighborhood property line to the first interior intersection.

4. Public art or water feature including signage displaying the name of the neighborhood. The sign shall be a minimum of six square feet in size.

5. Minimum four-foot wide landscaped median including signage displaying the name of the neighborhood a minimum of six square feet in size. The landscaped median shall extend from the neighborhood property line to the first interior intersection.

6. Minimum four-foot wide landscaping on both sides of the entry drive from the neighborhood property line to the first interior intersection. These landscaped areas shall include a minimum of one tree per every 15 feet of street length Standard 3.4.1.B Entry Drive Lighting
Shielded street lighting on poles 10 to 20 feet high shall be provided on at least one side of the Arterial Entry Drive, extending from the neighborhood property line to the first interior intersection.

Border Design
Perimeter walls shall be provided along the borders of all residential subdivisions and neighborhoods facing arterial streets. Any required perimeter walls shall be compliant with the following standards.

Standard 3.4.1.C Perimeter Wall Design
Perimeter walls along arterials shall incorporate one of the following design variations at least every 40 feet in length:

1. Change in height of at least twenty percent of the total wall height.

2. Change in material, texture or color.

3. Break in the wall plane, including projecting or recessed areas.

Standard 3.4.1.D Perimeter Wall Construction
All perimeter walls shall be of masonry construction using brick or stone. Precast or prefabricated perimeter walls of any material shall be prohibited.

Standard 3.4.1.E Perimeter Landscaping
Neighborhood perimeters shall incorporate a combination of plantings, including, but not limited to, grasses, ground covers, shrubs, and/or vines within two feet from the base of the perimeter wall or fence.

19 Standard 3.4.1.F Perimeter Trees
Trees selected from the City of Hanford Approved Street Tree List and at least 15 gallons in size with a one-inch diameter at breast height (dbh) shall be planted a maximum of 30 feet apart along neighborhood perimeters.

3.4.2  Circulation
GOAL: Provide a circulation system that facilitates neighborhood connectivity and ensures pedestrian and bicycle safety.

Connectivity
Standard 3.4.2.A Common Spaces
All parks and common spaces shall be directly accessible by at least one street and one pedestrian pathway, bicycle facility and/or multimodal pathway.

Standard 3.4.2.B Cul-de-Sacs
The ends of all cul-de-sacs longer than 300 feet shall include a pedestrian connection to another street, multi-modal pathway or common open space.

3.4.3  Lot and Size Variation
GOAL: Avoidance of repetitive lot patterns and building placement.

Standard 3.4.3.A Unit Design Variation
Subdivisions with more than four units shall include at least three models for residential units.

Any used models shall differ in both floor plan and elevation design.

Standard 3.4.3.B Adjacent Building Design
No home shall be located adjacent to, or across the street from, a home with the same floor plan or building elevation.

20 Standard 3.4.3.C Corner Unit Design
Units located on corner lots shall incorporate at least two of the following design details enhancements:

1. Shutters on the street-facing windows

2. Wrap-around decorative horizontal cladding

3. Roof gables or other projections

3.4.4  Common Open Space
GOAL: Create active and passive common open spaces, each of which contributes to equitable access, safety, and service to residents who are differently abled or with special needs.

Active and Passive Recreation
Common open spaces in residential neighborhoods and subdivisions shall include active and passive assets to accommodate all neighborhood residents, as provided for by the following standards:

Standard 3.4.4.A Unit Design Variation
Common open spaces shall include at least three of the following active recreation assets:

1. Play Structures

2. Exercise machines

3. Fitness series

4. Play Courts

5. Swing sets

6. Jogging path

7. Dog play area
Standard 3.4.4.B Passive Assets
Common open spaces shall include at least three of the following passive recreation assets:

1. Seating or benches

2. Permanent picnic or game tables

3. Planters within incorporated seating

4. Permanent shade structures

5. Dog waste station

21 Inclusive Play
Community parks shall be made accessible to and safe for residents with special needs and abilities through compliance with the following standards:

Standard 3.4.4.C Enclosed Play Areas
Play areas of community parks shall be clearly defined by a one- to two-foot tall planter or seating structure for supervising adults. The enclosure shall include at least two, minimum five-foot wide access points.

Standard 3.4.4.D Safe Surfaces
All non-turf active play areas shall be underlain by soft ground cover such as mulch, safety playground mats or poured in place rubber.

3.4.5  Neighborhood Lighting
GOAL: Provide lighting that ensures multimodal safety, pedestrian scale and design compatibility.

Standard 3.4.5.A Pedestrian Lighting
All areas used by pedestrians and cyclists shall be illuminated at night. Such areas include:

1. Pedestrian pathways

2. Bicycle facilities

3. Multi-modal pathways

4. Open spaces
Standard 3.4.5.B Street Lighting
Street lighting shall be installed inside the project along the network of internal streets.

Standard 3.4.5.C Inappropriate lighting
No lights that blink, revolve, flash, or change intensity shall be permitted in residential neighborhoods.

3.4.6  Landscaping
Plantings
GOAL: Include landscaping and plantings that enhance quality of single family residential neighborhoods and the local environment.

22 Standard 3.4.6.A Interference with Utilities
Plant materials shall be placed so they do not restrict access to emergency apparatus such as fire hydrants or for four alarm boxes or disturb overhead lines or underground utilities. Trees and large shrubs shall be placed as follows:

1. A minimum of 6 feet between the center of trees and the edge of a driveway, a water meter, gas meter, and sewer laterals.

2. A minimum of 20 feet between the center of trees and the beginning of curb returns at intersections to keep trees out of the line-of-sight triangle at intersections.

3. A minimum of 15 feet between the center of trees and large shrubs to utility poles and streetlights.

4. A minimum of 8 feet between the center of trees or large shrubs and fire hydrants and fire department sprinkler and standpipe connections.

Standard 3.4.6.B Staking and Root Barriers
All young trees shall be securely staked with double staking and/or guy-wires. Root barriers shall be required for any tree placed within 10 feet of pavement or other conditions where roots could disrupt adjacent paving/curb surfaces.

Standard 3.4.5.C Irrigation Enclosures
All irrigation systems shall be designed to reduce vandalism by placing controls in appropriate enclosures.

23 3.5 Small Lot Standards (3,200 sqft – 4,999 sqft)
These standards apply to detached single-family dwellings located on lots containing between 3,200 and 4,999 square feet, whether created as part of a subdivision or developed individually.

Sections 3.1 through 3.4 continue to apply. Where a small-lot standard expressly conflicts with another standard in this document, the small-lot standard shall control.

3.5.1 Development Standards
GOAL: Ensure that small-lot development is compatible with applicable zoning requirements while providing a clear and predictable review process.

Standard 3.5.1.A Compliance with the Municipal Code
Small-lot development shall comply with the minimum lot area, lot width, lot depth, building setbacks, building height, lot coverage, parking, and all other applicable development standards established by the Hanford Municipal Code for the zoning district in which the property is located.

These Objective Design Standards do not modify or supersede the applicable development standards of the Hanford Municipal Code. In the event of a conflict, the Hanford Municipal Code shall control.

Standard 3.5.1.B Maximum Front-Yard Impervious Coverage For a small lot, impervious surfaces shall not cover more than 70 percent of the required front- yard area. The percentage shall be calculated by dividing the total area of impervious surfaces located within the required front yard by the total required front-yard area. Impervious surfaces outside the required front yard shall not be included in this calculation. Pervious concrete and permeable unit pavers installed over a permeable base shall not be counted as impervious surfaces when product specifications and construction details are shown on the approved plans.

For small lots, this standard supersedes the 50-percent front-yard hardscape limitation established by Standard 3.3.1.A.

24 3.5.2  Garage and Driveway Design
GOAL: Reduce the visual prominence of garages and driveways on narrow lots while maintaining functional vehicle access.

Standard 3.5.2.A Garage Recess
A front-facing garage door shall be recessed at least five feet behind the frontmost wall plane of the habitable portion of the dwelling. Porches, entry roofs, columns, and similar projections shall not be considered part of the habitable wall plane for purposes of this measurement.

Standard 3.5.2.B Tandem Garages
On lots less than 40 feet wide, a tandem garage may be used. A tandem garage shall have a maximum exterior width of 13 feet and a minimum unobstructed interior depth of 38 feet.

Standard 3.5.2.C Driveway Width
Driveway width, measured at the front property line, shall not exceed:

1. Twelve feet for a one-car or tandem garage.

2. Eighteen feet for a two-car garage.

A driveway may flare outward by no more than one foot on each side within five feet of the garage door.

Standard 3.5.2.D Additional Front-Yard Paving
Additional parking pads and pavement located outside the approved driveway and pedestrian walkway are prohibited within the required front yard.

3.5.3 Usable Private Open Space
GOAL: Reduce the visual prominence of garages and driveways on narrow lots while maintaining functional vehicle access.

Standard 3.5.3.A Minimum Area
Each small lot shall provide at least 300 square feet of contiguous usable private open space. The required open-space area shall have no dimension less than 12 feet.

25 Standard 3.5.3.B Qualifying Areas
Usable private open space may consist of a rear yard, side yard, courtyard, patio, or a combination of these areas. Driveways, required parking spaces, utility areas, and portions of a yard having a dimension of less than five feet shall not count toward the required area.

Standard 3.5.3.C Access
Required usable private open space shall be directly accessible from a habitable room within the dwelling by a door or other operable entry.

3.5.4 Upper-Floor Design
GOAL: Protect the privacy of neighboring residences and reduce the perceived mass of upper floors on closely spaced residential lots.

Standard 3.5.4.A Upper-Floor Window Placement
For small lots, the following standard supersedes Standard 3.1.2.A. An upper-floor window serving a room and facing an interior side property line shall not directly align with an upper-floor window serving a room in an adjacent dwelling located within 15 feet. Compliance shall be achieved through at least one of the following:

1. The centerlines of the facing windows are offset horizontally by at least 3 feet.

2. The window has a minimum sill height of 5 feet above the finished floor.

3. The window incorporates permanently obscured glazing to a height of at least 5 feet above the finished floor.

3.5.5 Guest Parking
GOAL: Provide accessible guest parking within developments containing a significant concentration of small lots where narrow street frontages, driveways, and curb cuts limit the availability of on-street parking.

Standard 3.5.5.A Applicability
When 25 percent or more of the residential lots within a subdivision or planned residential development qualify as small lots under this section, the development shall provide off-street guest parking. This requirement applies regardless of whether parking is permitted on the streets serving the development.