Cities Index.
Presentations

Hayward City Council
April 19, 2022

Document
Presentations
Meeting
April 19, 2022
Body
Hayward City Council
Original file
13.3 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on hayward.legistar.com. That file is the official record.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

APRIL 19, 2022

PRESENTATIONS

EARTH DAY POSTER
AND

WRITING CONTEST

WINNERS

1 April 19, 2022
39th Annual Earth Day
Poster & Writing Contest
Awards Presentation
2 3

4 5
Poster & Writing Judges
Pat Doyne
Lani Llamido
Tressa Marques
Bruce & Kathy Roberts
Jayendra Singh
Ruey Syrop
Thank you for volunteering your time to evaluate and select our winners. 6 7
Writing Winners
Kindergarten – 1st Grade
2nd PLACE
Anabelle Sofie León
Hernández
Schafer Park
Elementary School
I want my community to
be safe and litter-free.
8 Writing Winners
Kindergarten – 1st Grade
1st PLACE
Isaac Kim
Valley View Charter Prep
I want redwood trees to be
around for a long time for the
animals, plants, and for our
beautiful earth.
9 Poster Winners
Kindergarten – 1st Grade
2nd PLACE
Scarlett Huang
Stratford School

10 Poster Winners
Kindergarten – 1st Grade
1st PLACE
Eliza Lee
Stonebrae Elementary
School

11 Writing Winners
2nd Grade – 3rd Grade
2nd PLACE
Rilee AniVee Josch
Stonebrae Elementary
School
It's the best earth I've seen
it's all because of you
12 Writing Winners
2nd Grade – 3rd Grade
1st PLACE
Camila Garcia Araujo
Cherryland Elementary
School
If you want to make a change
to the earth, I will explain to
you how to recycle and make
healthy compost.

13 Poster Winners
2nd Grade – 3rd Grade
2nd PLACE
Natalie Huang
Stonebrae Elementary
School

14 Poster Winners
2nd Grade – 3rd Grade
1st PLACE
Noah Jones
Lorenzo Manor Elementary
School

15 Writing Winners
4th Grade – 5th Grade
2nd PLACE
Tiberius Reip
All Saints Catholic School
You have the power to save the planet

16 Writing Winners
4th Grade – 5th Grade
1st PLACE
Adelyn Kim
Connecting Waters Charter
School East Bay
Could we trade in all our
grievances and aggression for
world peace in order to save
our planet and everything in it?

17 Poster Winners
4th Grade – 5th Grade
2nd PLACE
Amélie Itzel León
Hernández
Schafer Park
Elementary School

18 Poster Winners
4th Grade – 5th Grade
1st PLACE
Samuel Chiu
California Crosspoint
Academy

19 Writing Winners
6th Grade – 8th Grade
2nd PLACE
Faisal Rohan
Cesar Chavez Middle School
Recycling takes a minute or
two, but the impact it has on
the environment is worth
much more than the time
you put into it.

20 Writing Winners
6th Grade – 8th Grade
1st PLACE
Tazkiya Khan
KEY Academy Charter
School
Our good actions are surely
creating a spark

21 Poster Winners
6th Grade – 8th Grade
2nd PLACE
Anne Marie M. Velasco
Longwood Elementary
School

22 Poster Winners
6th Grade – 8th Grade
1st PLACE
Enaliah Valle
Burbank Elementary
School

23 Writing Winners
9th Grade – 12th Grade
2nd PLACE
Samiksha Lingan
Hayward High School
We try to buy ourselves more
time, but this transaction will
be successful only if we
combat the excessive use of
nonrenewable energy.

24 Writing Winners
9th Grade – 12th Grade
1st PLACE
Grace Lee
California Crosspoint Academy
Protect my home or I'm
to blame
For the future beyond
my range
25 Poster Winners
9th Grade – 12th Grade
2nd PLACE
Samuel Fung
California Crosspoint
Academy

26 Poster Winners
9th Grade – 12th Grade
1st PLACE
Hannah Smith
Tennyson High School

27 Teachers with Writing Winners
Amy Bame
Valley View Charter Prep
Melissa Arteaga
Schafer Park Elementary School
Ms. Sittre
Cherryland Elementary School
Ms. Grace You
Stonebrae Elementary School
Cher Silva
Connecting Waters Charter School East Bay
Kevin Ferrier
All Saints Catholic School
Mr. Roel Peña
KEY Academy Charter School
Maria Orfanos
Cesar Chavez Middle School
Mr. Carey Fong
California Crosspoint Academy
Israel Hernandez
Hayward High School
28 Teachers with Poster Winners
Alice Chiu
Stonebrae Elementary School
Aparna Pendela
Stratford School
Ms. Ma
Lorenzo Manor Elementary School
Ms. Grace You
Stonebrae Elementary School
Mr. Tommy Chan
California Crosspoint Academy
Ms. Monserrat Rueda-
Hernandez
Schafer Elementary School
Inmaculada Butler
Burbank Elementary School
Ms. Meier
Longwood Elementary School
Ms. Karen Kelly
Tennyson High School
29 Thank you and
congratulations!
Earth Day Poster & Writing Contest

PUBLIC HEARING

ITEM #14

PH 22-021

SALE AND DEVELOPMENT
OF
PARCEL GROUP 5

BUNKER HILL

Parcel Group 5 –
Bunker Hill Development

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

VICINITY
MAP
Project Background
Caltrans 238 Parcels

Master Development Plan

Neighborhood Outreach
 The city & developer held numerous neighborhood
and community meetings throughout the Master
Development Plan & development application review
process.
 Public comments & concerns revolved around
 Retaining rural character of site & open space for
wildlife,
 Construction of Foothill Trail & Carlos Bee roadway
connector,
 Minimizing traffic impacts on surrounding
neighborhoods,
 Providing adequate parking.

Additional Public Comment &
Responses
The City also received correspondence from the Friends of San Lorenzo Creek. Staff reviewed and provided responses to the topics covered in the correspondence as follows:
 FSLC inquired about the proposed development relative to the riparian corridors.
✓ Staff provided the requested information to FSLC & included Waterboard and California Department of Fish & Wildlife on the correspondence. At Lot 34, the closest point to the riparian areas, the edge of development is approximately 60 feet horizontally and 30 feet vertically from the edge of creek.

Site Investigations
 Prior to submittal of the application, WRA conducted site investigations to assess the site for the presence of
streams, wetland, riparian vegetation and biological
resources and prepared Site Assessment Memos that
were submitted with the application.
 Based on WRA’s findings and recommendations, the
development is designed to avoid wetlands, streams and
riparian vegetation.
 WRA found that no adverse impacts would occur to the
riparian corridors with the inclusion of standard erosion control measures and biological resources surveys, which were included as conditions of approval.

Southern Riparian Area

Northern Riparian Area

Additional Public Comment &
Responses
 FSLC inquired about using California Native landscaping in riparian & open space areas.
✓ Staff added a Condition of Approval that two plant palettes be prepared and submitted – one palette for open spaces that would include only California Native plantings and one palette for streets and yards that could include non-invasive, non- Native plantings.
 FSLC inquired about who would be responsible for removal of trash & debris in the riparian areas.
✓ Staff added a Condition of Approval requiring the developer & Homeowners Association be responsible for removing trash and debris both during and following construction.

Additional Public Comment &
Responses
 FSLC requested details on stormdrain design & maintenance. ✓ Staff clarified that detailed stormdrain design will occur at the Improvement Plan stage per standard practice & Conditions of Approval. The creeks are private and will be maintained by the HOA.

Existing public outfalls & culverts (i.e. north creek at Harder Road) will be maintained by the City.
 FSLC inquired about repair of existing old stormdrain pipes in the creek bed.
✓ Staff clarified that final drainage design, including discharge back into the creek at current rate of flows, will be determined at the Improvement Plan stage. All attempts will be made to avoid conducting any work within the riparian corridor and creek area including removal and repair of old pipes.

Additional Public Comment &
Responses
 FSLC inquired about repair & replacement of an old road that washed out in the area.
✓ Staff noted that an informal dirt road created by area residents was washed out due to erosion. The development is not
responsible for existing conditions and nothing in the proposed development would exacerbate this condition.
 FSLC inquired about repair of holes in the creek bed. ✓ The existing holes in the north creek were created prior to the proposed development and are located within the designated riparian corridor, which will not be impacted by the development.

As noted above, all attempts will be made to avoid conducting any work within the riparian corridor and creek area.

Additional Public Comment &
Responses
 FSLC inquired about access to the creek for trail connections. ✓ Staff clarified that the riparian corridor and creek access was not envisioned in the Master Development Plan & will not be provided as part of the project.
 FSLC inquired about who is responsible for invasive ivy growing in the riparian areas.
✓ As already noted in previous responses, staff noted that the riparian corridors will be privately-owned, and all maintenance responsibilities will be through the HOA.

Proposed Project
Project Description
 Zone Change from Residential Natural Preserve
District to Planned Development District to allow for
flexible development standards consistent with the
approved Master Development Plan.
 Proposed project includes development of 74 single
family homes and 18 Accessory Dwelling Units.
 Lots range from approximately 5,100 to 23,400 with
average 10,200 sq. ft. lots.
 Lots include varied setbacks and two to three story
homes.

Project Description
 Each lot will have 2 to 3 garage parking spaces and 2 driveway spaces.
 81 on-street parking spaces.
 Construction of a new roadway connector from
Bunker Hill Blvd to Carlos Bee Blvd with right in/right out access for safety purposes.
 Construction of 3,000 linear feet of 16-foot-wide
Foothill Trail with stairs and overlooks.
 PD District will include four privately owned lots
within the boundaries of the PD District that could be
subdivided into two lots each, subject to RS District
standards.

Site Plan

Sample Elevations - Uphill
Sample Elevations - Downhill
Sample Elevations – Flat Lots
Architectural Site Plan

View Along Bunker Hill Blvd
Pedestrian, Bicycle & Vehicular
Connectivity

Foothill Trail

Foothill Trail

Traffic Calming & TDM
 Traffic Study:
 63 AM Peak Hour, 84 PM Peak Hour
 No new significant impacts or deficiencies
 Construction of sidewalks and on-street parking
along Bunker Hill Blvd & Maitland Dr.
 Bicycle facilities, stop signs, center line striping on surrounding roadways.
 Additional funds toward future traffic calming
measures & construction of future pedestrian and
bicycle improvements and connections.

Bunker Hill/Carlos Bee Blvd.
(Conceptual)
Affordable Housing Plan
 Per the Master Development Plan, a total of 8
Accessory Dwelling Units shall be deed restricted for
Very Low-Income households.
 Per Surplus Land Act requirements, an additional 10
Accessory Dwelling Units (total of 18) shall be deed
restricted for Very Low-Income households.
 The applicant also will contribute 50% of the
Affordable Housing In Lieu Fee on 90% of the
habitable sq. ft. of project. Estimated $1.9 million in fees.

Zone Change
 Consistent with General Plan density & goals and
policies to redevelop underutilized parcels; to encourage infill residential development; to create a connected
block and street network; and to integrate development
into hillsides, among others.
 Fulfills purpose and intent of Planned Development
District to protect approximately half of the site as open space, to protect sensitive riparian corridors and to allow varied lot sizes and development standards.
 Includes amenities such as construction of 3,000 linear feet of the Foothill Trail, outlooks and ongoing
maintenance of the trail.
 Purchase Price – $14,000,000 (Caltrans Base Price: $10.1 million, $3.9 million net to City)
 Land Transfer – Closing on land requires full purchase price due to Caltrans, approval of the mass grading
and Phase 1 horizontal infrastructure permit; execution of public improvement agreement, including bonds
for all infrastructure
 Schedule and Performance Milestones – Development
must comply with milestones for close of escrow,
commencement and completion of construction and
certificate of occupancy, among others
Disposition and Development
Agreement Key Terms
 Infrastructure Phasing and Bonds – Infrastructure is
phased, but bonds for all horizontal infrastructure
provided at closing
 Vertical Guaranty – Guaranty for completion of all
development provided at close of escrow
Disposition and Development
Agreement Key Terms
 Affordable Housing Agreement - The City will record a Regulatory Agreement against title to each of the 18
properties that include an affordable ADU and
property owner must:
 If rented, obtain City approval of income eligibility;  Request City approval of rent increases;
 Complete annual report confirming tenant’s income eligibility, monthly rent paid, and a list of all occupants;
 Allow the City to inspect the property and leasing records; and  Notify the City about sale of the property.
 To assist homeowners in complying with these requirements, the HOA will be required to contract with a Management Agent that will help with marketing the affordable units and calculating income eligibility.

Disposition and Development
Agreement Key Terms
CEQA
 In June 2019, LSA prepared an Addendum to the
General Plan EIR analyzing the Parcel Group 5 Master
Development Plan.
 The Addendum found no new impacts, no increase
in the severity of impacts and that the project would
not require revisions to the General Plan EIR.
 In January 2021, LSA analyzed the inclusion of four
additional privately owned parcels in the Zone
Change and found that no new impacts or increase
in severity of impacts would occur.
 Accessory Dwelling Units are not subject to CEQA.

Planning Commission
 On March 24, 2022, the Planning Commission voted
4:3:0 to recommend approval of the proposed
project with the following recommendations:
 The Council allocate some of the proceeds from
the land sale toward affordable housing, and
 The applicant work with neighbors to address on-
street parking concerns and to “soften the
architecture.”
 The Commissioners that recommended denial were
concerned about the deed-restricted ADUs and did
not think that the architecture was appropriate for
the area.

Staff Recommendation
That the City Council:
1) Adopts the Ordinance Approving the Zone
Change to Planned Development District;
2) Adopts the Resolution Making Findings to
Approve the Zone Change, Vesting Tentative
Map & Related Environmental Analysis; and
3) Adopts the Resolution Approving Government
Code Section 52201 Summary Report and
Authorizing the City Manager to Negotiate and
Execute a Disposition and Development
Agreement.

Questions & Discussion
?
!
Bunker
Hill
Parcel Group 5
19 April 2022
City Council

Introductions
P amela (Salas) Nieting, PE, LEED AP , QSD ,
Director of Community Development
Garrett Hinds, Vice President of Architecture

Things to cover…

1. Design Fundamentals

2. Site Plan Evolution

3. Architecture: Inspiration and Programing

4. Affordable Housing Programming

5. Questions
Partnership
Almost 2 Years of Thoughtful Coordination, Teamwork & Response with City Staff and the Community… » Safety
» Aesthetics
» Sustainability
» Resilience
» Outdoor Living
» Nature Inspired
» Fitness
» Bay Area Living
» Neighborhood
» Connectivity

Design
Fundamentals
Climate Action Plan
Bunker Hill
Sustainability
Land Use
Resilience
Energy
Greenhouse
Gas &
Carbon
Footprint
Reduction
Sustainability & Green Building Initiative
Environmental Sustainability

Resilience
Resilience

Site Plan
Evolution
Site Plan Evolution
draft

Site Plan Evolution
Connectivity
draft

Site Plan Evolution
Outdoor Living
draft

Site Plan Evolution
Outdoor Living
draft

Architecture:

Inspiration &
Programming
Architecture: Inspiration and Programming
draft

Architecture: Inspiration and Programming
draft

Architecture: Inspiration and Programming
draft
San
Francisco
Bay View
Architecture: Inspiration and Programming
draft

Architecture: Inspiration and Programming
draft

Architecture: Inspiration and Programming
draft

Architecture: Inspiration and Programming
draft

Affordable
Housing
Programming
Affordable Housing
Payment
Payment of approximately $2 M of in-
lieu fee to City of Hayward
inclusionary Fund for the purpose of
providing affordable ownership or
rental housing
18 Attached deed restricted “very low”
AMI homes accessory dwelling units
(ADUs). This is an additional 10 units to
the requirement.

On-Site

Questions?
Thank you!

PUBLIC HEARING

ITEM #15

PH 22-022

ROCKAWAY LANE
WIDTH

REALIGNMENT

Hayward Police Department Year-End Report
1 Proposed Amendment to Rockaway Ln
Precise Plan Line
Reduction in Right
-
of
-
Way Width Requirement
from 68 feet to 56 feet
City Council Public Hearing
April 19, 2022
Scott Wikstrom, Development Services Engineer
Hayward Police Department Year-End Report
2 What is a Precise Plan Line?
• Reservation of Right-of-Way to Accommodate Future Growth HMC Section 10-4.56: “The precise plan line requirement for Rockaway Lane from “A” Street to Russell Way shall be a minimum of sixty-eight (68) feet.” adopted July 14, 1964 • Consistent with General Plan (at the time of Adoption) • Right-of-Way Dedication is Required at the time of New Development Hayward Police Department Year-End Report
3 Rockaway Lane Precise Plan Line
• Development at 22422 Rockaway Lane – 20-foot Dedication Requirement • Owner/Applicant Requests Reduction of Precise Plan Line • Planning Commission Recommends Reduction at Feb 10, 2022 Meeting • Per HMC, City Council Adopted Resolution of Intent on March 22nd • Public Hearing Set for April 19th to hear Interested Parties Hayward Police Department Year-End Report
4 Vicinity Map – Rockaway Lane
Hayward Police Department Year-End Report
5Route 238 Bypass
• State Adopts Preferred Bypass Location in 1961
• Rockaway Lane identified as Freeway Off Ramp
and Precise Plan Line Amended in 1964
• Route 238 Bypass Rescinded in 2010
Hayward Police Department Year-End Report
6 • Commercial / High Density Residential Designation
• Rockaway Lane Identified as a Local Street
• No Plans for Roadway Extension or Expansion
• Not Identified as Bicycle Route or for Enhanced
Pedestrian Improvements in Bike & Ped Master Plan

Hayward Police Department Year-End Report
7 Rockaway Lane – Existing 48’ Right-of-Way
• Too Narrow for Parking and Fire Lane
• 20’ Dedication Required – all on east side of Rockaway Hayward Police Department Year-End Report
8 Example 68’ Wide Right-of-Way – Huntwood Ave

Hayward Police Department Year-End Report
9 Example 56’ Wide Right-of-Way – Manon Ave

Hayward Police Department Year-End Report
10Proposed 56’ Wide Right-of-Way
• A 68’ wide Right-of-Way is Unnecessary and a Burden to Development • Staff Recommends a Standard 56’ Wide Residential Street • Travel Lane in Each Direction and Parking and Sidewalks on Both Sides • Consistent with Existing Improvements on West Side of Road Hayward Police Department Year-End Report
1122422 Rockaway Lane – Impact to Development
• Amending the Precise Plan Line
is Independent of a Development
Application at 22422 Rockaway.

STAFF

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:
✓ Introduces an Ordinance to Amend the Precise Plan Line for Rockaway Lane from “A” Street to Russell Way,
Reducing the Right-of-Way Width from 68 feet to 56 feet

← All documents from this meeting