Agenda Packet — Hayward City Council, October 11, 2022 (part 1 of 2)

Tuesday, October 11, 2022
7:00 PM

CITY OF HAYWARD
Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
Council Chamber and Virtual Platform (Zoom)
City Council
Agenda
City Council Agenda October 11, 2022

SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
NOTICE: The City Council will hold a hybrid meeting in Council Chambers and virtually via Zoom.

How to observe the Meeting:

1. Comcast TV Channel 15

2. Live stream https://hayward.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx

3. YouTube Live stream: https://www.youtube.com/user/cityofhayward How to submit written Public Comment:

1. Use eComment on the City's Meeting & Agenda Center webpage at:
https://hayward.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx. eComments are directly sent to the iLegislate application used by City Council and City staff. Comments received before 3:00 p.m. the day of the meeting will be exported into a report, distributed to the City Council and staff, and published on the City's Meeting & Agenda Center under Documents Received After Published Agenda.

2. Send an email to [email protected] by 3:00 p.m. the day of the meeting. Please identify the Agenda Item Number in the subject line of your email. Emails will be compiled into one file, distributed to the City Council and staff, and published on the City's Meeting & Agenda Center under Documents Received After Published Agenda. Documents received after 3:00 p.m. through the adjournment of the meeting will be included as part of the meeting record and published the following day.

How to provide live Public Comment during the City Council Meeting:

Participate in the Council Chambers or click link below to join the meeting:
https://hayward.zoom.us/j/84415253276?pwd=NG9tZjhXVmkwczU5NStHVHh3NWpqZz09 Meeting ID: 844 1525 3276
Password: CC10/11@7p
or
Dial: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 646 931 3860
Meeting ID: 844 1525 3276
Password: 7211607104
A Guide to attend virtual meetings is provided at this link: https://bit.ly/3jmaUxa CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Halliday
Pledge of Allegiance: Council Member Salinas

ROLL CALL

CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENT
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 2 Tuesday, October 11, 2022
City Council Agenda October 11, 2022

PUBLIC COMMENTS
The Public Comment section provides an opportunity to address the City Council on items not listed on the agenda or Information Items. The Council welcomes comments and requests that speakers present their remarks in a respectful manner, within established time limits, and focus on issues which directly affect the City or are within the jurisdiction of the City. As the Council is prohibited by State law from discussing items not listed on the agenda, items will be taken under consideration and may be referred to staff.

CITY MANAGER’S COMMENTS
An oral report from the City Manager on upcoming activities, events, or other items of general interest to Council and the Public.

ACTION ITEMS
The Council will permit comment as each item is called for the Consent Calendar, Public Hearings, and Legislative Business. In the case of the Consent Calendar, a specific item will need to be pulled by a Council Member in order for the Council to discuss the item or to permit public comment on the item. Please notify the City Clerk any time before the Consent Calendar is voted on by Council if you wish to speak on a Consent Item.

CONSENT
Approve the City Council Minutes of the City Council Meeting on September 20, 2022

1. MIN 22-115
Attachments: Attachment I Draft Minutes of 9/20/2022
Approve the City Council Minutes of the City Council Meeting on September 27, 2022

2. MIN 22-116
Attachments: Attachment I Draft Minutes of 9/27/2022
Adopt a Resolution Accepting the Resignation of Mr. Roy Mick Rubio from the Community Services Commission, Effective Immediately

3. CONS 22-547
Attachments: Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
Attachment III Resignation Letter
Adopt a Resolution Appointing Ms. Elaine Alvite to the
Community Services Commission to Fill the Unexpired Term of Mr. Roy Mick Rubio

4. CONS 22-548
Attachments: Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 3 Tuesday, October 11, 2022
City Council Agenda October 11, 2022
Adopt a Resolution Accepting the Resignation of Ms. Linda Xu from the Keep Hayward Clean and Green Task Force, Effective Immediately

5. CONS 22-559
Attachments: Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
Attachment III Resignation Letter
Adopt a Resolution Approving Addendums No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3, Accepting the Bid Protest, and Awarding a Contract to Blocka Construction, Inc., for the Water Pollution Control Facility Switchgear Rehabilitation Project No. 07656, in an Amount Not-to Exceed $13,169,800, and Appropriating Additional Funds in the Amount of $2,669,635

6. CONS 22-542
Attachments: Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Accept and Appropriate $55,000 in Grant Funding From the University of California Davis Koret Shelter Medicine Program’s “California for All Animals” Grant to the Hayward Police Department’s Animal Services Bureau

7. CONS 22-526
Attachments: Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Accept and Appropriate $125,000 in Grant Funding from the Stupski
Foundation for the Hayward Food, Agriculture, and Economy Plan

8. CONS 22-555
Attachments: Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Accept and Appropriate $29,000 in Grant Funding from the Alameda
County Office of Emergency Services for the Installation of a Transfer Switch for the Hayward Communication Center

9. CONS 22-557
Attachments: Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
Attachment III Award Letter
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 4 Tuesday, October 11, 2022
City Council Agenda October 11, 2022
Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute a Lease Agreement with Forestr.org for the Hazel Community Garden through December 31, 2023, with an
Option for a Two-Year Extension

10. CONS 22-562
Attachments: Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution

WORK SESSION
Work Session items are non-action items. Although the Council may discuss or direct staff to follow up on these items, no formal action will be taken. Any formal action will be placed on the agenda at a subsequent meeting in the action sections of the agenda.

Downtown Hayward Improvement Association: Report on
Activities from Downtown Hayward Improvement Association District Manager (Oral Report Only) (Report from Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director Ott)

11. WS 22-032
Attachments: Attachment I Presentation
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 5 Tuesday, October 11, 2022
City Council Agenda October 11, 2022

PUBLIC HEARING
Manon Avenue Project: Proposed Development with 22 Rental Townhome Units and Related Site Improvements at 27865
Manon Avenue, Assessor Parcel Number 453-0090-014-00,
Requiring Approval of Zone Change, Density Bonus, and Site Plan Review Application 202101491. Ragini Vecham for
Sunflower Manon LLC (Applicant and Property Owner) (Report from Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director Ott)

12. PH 22-052
Attachments: Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Ordinance
Attachment III Resolution
Attachment IV Project Plans
Attachment V Affordable Housing and Density Bonus Plan
Attachment VI Environmental Consistency Checklist
Attachment VII Draft Planning Commission Minutes 090822

INFORMATIONAL ITEM
Information items are presented as general information for Council and the public, and are not presented for discussion. Should Council wish to discuss or take action on any of the "information” items, they will direct the City Manager to bring them back at the next Council agenda as an Action Item.

Hayward Residential Design Study Update (Previously Named Residential Objective Standards and Zoning Consistency
Update)

13. RPT 22-089
Attachments: Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Vision Statement and Project Objectives
Attachment III Outreach Summary Report
Attachment IV Background Report

COUNCIL REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
Council Members can provide oral reports on attendance at intergovernmental agency meetings, conferences, seminars, or other Council events to comply with AB 1234 requirements (reimbursable expenses for official activities).

CITY OF HAYWARD Page 6 Tuesday, October 11, 2022
City Council Agenda October 11, 2022

COUNCIL REFERRALS
Council Members may bring forward a Council Referral Memorandum (Memo) on any topic to be considered by the entire Council. The intent of this Council Referrals section of the agenda is to provide an orderly means through which an individual Council Member can raise an issue for discussion and possible direction by the Council to the appropriate Council Appointed Officers for action by the applicable City staff.

ADJOURNMENT
NEXT MEETING, October 18, 2022, 7:00 PM

PUBLIC COMMENT RULES
Any member of the public desiring to address the Council shall limit their address to three (3) minutes unless less or further time has been granted by the Presiding Officer or in accordance with the section under Public Hearings. The Presiding Officer has the discretion to shorten or lengthen the maximum time members may speak. Speakers will be asked for their name before speaking and are expected to honor the allotted time.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE
That if you file a lawsuit challenging any final decision on any public hearing or legislative business item listed in this agenda, the issues in the lawsuit may be limited to the issues that were raised at the City's public hearing or presented in writing to the City Clerk at or before the public hearing.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE
That the City Council adopted Resolution No. 87-181 C.S., which imposes the 90-day deadline set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6 for filing of any lawsuit challenging final action on an agenda item which is subject to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5. ***Materials related to an item on the agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office, City Hall, 777 B Street, 4th Floor, Hayward, during normal business hours. An online version of this agenda and staff reports are available on the City’s website. Written comments submitted to the Council in connection with agenda items will be posted on the City’s website. All Council Meetings are broadcast simultaneously on the City website, Cable Channel 15 - KHRT, and YouTube. ***
Assistance will be provided to those requiring accommodations for disabilities in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Interested persons must request the accommodation at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting by contacting the City Clerk at (510) 583-4400 or [email protected].

Assistance will be provided to those requiring language assistance. To ensure that interpreters are available at the meeting, interested persons must request the accommodation at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting by contacting the City Clerk at (510) 583-4400.

CITY OF HAYWARD Page 7 Tuesday, October 11, 2022
CITY OF HAYWARD Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
File #: MIN 22-115
DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Clerk

SUBJECT
Approve the City Council Minutes of the City Council Meeting on September 20, 2022

RECOMMENDATION
That the Council approves the City Council meeting minutes of September 20, 2022.

SUMMARY
The City Council held a meeting on September 20, 2022.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I Draft Minutes of September 20, 2022
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 1 of 1 Printed on 10/6/2022
powered by Legistar™

The City Council meeting was called to order by Mayor Halliday at 7:00 p.m. The City Council held a hybrid meeting in Council Chambers and virtually via Zoom.

Pledge of Allegiance: Council Member Lamnin
Present
Council Chamber: Council Members Lamnin, Salinas, Zermeño Mayor Halliday
Virtual Platform (Zoom): Council Members Andrews, Márquez, Wahab

Absent: None

CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENT
The City Council convened in closed session at 4:30 p.m., with all members of the City Council present and no public speakers, regarding seven items: (1) conference with labor negotiators pursuant to Government Code section 54957.6 regarding the Hayward Police Officers Association and other bargaining units; (2) conference with property negotiators pursuant to Government Code section 54956.8 regarding Caltrans Parcel Group 3, adjacent to Tennyson Road, East 16th Street and Calhoun Street, APNs: 078C-0626-003-16,078C-0626-003-09, 078C-0626-001-07; (3) conference with property negotiators pursuant to Government Code section 54956.8 regarding Caltrans Parcel Group 5, Maitland Drive, Bunker Hill Court, Bunker Hill Boulevard and Central Boulevard, APNs: 445-0250-041-01, 445-0260-084-03, 445-0260- 018-04, 445-0270-054-02, 445-0250-060-00, 445-0250-059-01, 445-0260-109-04, 445- 0260-018-03, 445-0260-109-03, 445-0260-002-00; (4) conference with legal counsel pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9 regarding Ann Rosalia, et al. v. City of Hayward, et al. United States District Court Case No. 21-cv-00380-VC; (5) conference with legal counsel pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9 regarding Darlene Martin v. City of Hayward, et al. Superior Court of California, County of Alameda Case No. HG21105380; (6) conference with legal counsel pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9 regarding Yolanda York, et al. v. City of Hayward, Superior Court of California, County of Alameda Case No. HG20070507; and (7) conference with legal counsel pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9 regarding Cynthia Grine, et al. v. City of Hayward, Superior Court of California, County of Alameda Case No. RG2000404. City Attorney Lawson reported on the items as follows: there was no reportable action related to Item 1 and Item 4; regarding Item 2, the Council gave direction to staff, with Council Member Andrews recusing herself from participating, and took no reportable action; regarding Item 4 (Ann Rosalia v. City of Hayward) the Council gave direction to staff and took no reportable action; regarding Item 5 (Darlene Martin v. City of Hayward) the Council unanimously approved, with Council Member Zermeño moving and Council Member Lamnin seconding, settlement in the amount of $120,000 with the City contributing $90,000 and adjacent property owners contributing $30,000; regarding Item 6 (Yolanda York v. City of Hayward) the Council was advised that 2 | S e p t e m b e r 20 , 2 0 2 2
staff settled the matter for $50,000 and no Council action was required; and regarding Item 7 (Cynthia Grine v. City of Hayward) the Council unanimously approved, with Council Member Salinas moving and Council Member Márquez seconding, settlement in the amount of $75,000. The closed session adjourned at 6:30 p.m.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
Ms. Wanda Herpe, Hayward resident, spoke about her experience applying for a building permit to construct an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU), and expressed the process took longer and fees were more than expected.

Mr. Greg Popovich, with Goldbar Builders and contractor for the Herpes, spoke about SB 13, AB 68, and AB 881, indicated the City’s regulation do not align with state ADU law related to fees as they should be proportionate to the ADU size, noted his client’s fees were paid under protest, and asked for a response to his correspondence.

Ms. Donna Thomas, Hayward resident, referred to correspondence she submitted regarding BART and an agreement with the City for the maintenance of trees, noted the trees which are located between A Street and Simon Street, are overgrown, and requested that staff to look into the matter.

Hayward Youth Commissioner Samiksha Lingan and Bay Area Strength Through Activism (BASTA) youth leader, spoke about the need for smokefree multi-unit housing, noted secondhand smoke is dangerous to vulnerable populations and urged Council to prioritize the needs of the community.

Ms. Freda Barnes, multifamily housing resident, spoke about the negative impact of secondhand smoke and how it has impacted her health.

Ms. Jade Le asked for an update on the request to add smokefree multifamily housing to Council’s upcoming discussion and urged Council to prioritize the matter earlier than at the end of the fiscal year noting the Public Health Department supports the goal for smokefree multifamily housing.

City Manager McAdoo noted that staff is working on various regulatory projects and suggested new requests be a part of the prioritization discussion during the Strategic Roadmap update.

Council Member Wahab indicated that in May/June, Council had asked staff to prioritize Human Resources and recruitments to increase capacity and work on project requests.

In response to Council Member Márquez’s inquiry about a memo update on the matter, City Manager McAdoo indicated staff will work on an informational item which would include a timeline.

Ms. Mildred Vasquez, Hayward resident and BASTA member, noted that smoking and cigarette litter continue to be a problem in her apartment complex, and requested the matter be prioritized.

Mayor Halliday shared that in August, she presented a proclamation to Hayward’s Farmers Market in recognition of National Farmers Market Week.

CITY MANAGERS COMMENTS
City Manager McAdoo reported on the successful Hayward Executive Airport Open House on September 11, 2022.

CITY COMMISSIONS AND TASK FORCE

1. City Commissions and Keep Hayward Clean and Green Task Force: Adopt a Resolution Confirming the Appointment and Reappointment of Members of the Community Services Commission, Keep Hayward Clean and Green Task Force, Library Commission, Planning Commission and Personnel Commission APPT 22-002 Staff report submitted by City Clerk, Lens dated September 20, 2022, was filed.

City Clerk Lens provided a synopsis of the staff report and expressed gratitude for residents who applied to fill vacancies.

Council Member Márquez thanked staff for the recruitment process which included outreach efforts ensuring applicants represent the demographics of the community; and recommended that next year Council identify alternates for all commissions and the Keep Hayward Clean and Green Task Force to ensure vacancies are filled throughout the year.

Council Member Zermeño thanked the City Clerk team for the work done, agreed with the recommendation for alternates, and apologized that he was not able to participate in the interview process due to family obligations.

There being no public comments, Mayor Halliday opened and closed the public comment period at 7:47 p.m.

It was moved by Council Member Salinas, seconded by Council Member Márquez, and carried by the following roll call vote, to adopt the resolution with a recommendation that alternates be considered for all commissions and the Keep Hayward Clean and Green Task Force. 4 | S e p t e m b e r 20 , 2 0 2 2
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS Andrews, Lamnin, Márquez, Salinas, Wahab, Zermeño
MAYOR Halliday
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Resolution 22-229, “Resolution Confirming the Appointment and Reappointment of Members of the Community Services Commission, Keep Hayward Clean and Green Task Force, Library Commission, Personnel Commission and Planning Commission”
City Clerk Lens administered the oath of affirmation to the newly appointed and reappointed members who were in person in the Council Chambers.

CONSENT

2. Approve the City Council Minutes of the City Council Meeting on July 5, 2022 MIN 22- 103
It was moved by Council Member Wahab, seconded by Council Member Lamnin, and carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the City Council Meeting on July 5, 2022, with a minor amendment to the minutes.

3. Approve the City Council Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting on July 12, 2022 MIN 22-106
It was moved by Council Member Wahab, seconded by Council Member Lamnin, and carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the Special City Council Meeting on July 12, 2022.

4. Approve the City Council Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting on August 9, 2022 MIN 22-107
It was moved by Council Member Wahab, seconded by Council Member Lamnin, and carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the Special City Council Meeting on August 9, 2022.

5. Approve the City Council Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting on September 6, 2022 MIN 22-108
It was moved by Council Member Wahab, seconded by Council Member Lamnin, and carried unanimously to approve the minutes of the Special City Council Meeting on September 6, 2022.

6. Adopt a Resolution Accepting Revisions to the City of Hayward Conflict of Interest Code CONS 22-500
Staff report submitted by City Clerk, Lens dated September 20, 2022, was filed.

It was moved by Council Member Wahab, seconded by Council Member Lamnin, and carried by the following roll call vote, to adopt the resolution.

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS Andrews, Lamnin, Márquez, Salinas, Wahab, Zermeño
MAYOR Halliday
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Resolution 22-230, “Resolution Accepting Additions to the City of Hayward Conflict of Interest Code”

7. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement with Nelson Nygaard Consulting Associates to Provide Paratransit Consulting Services for the Hayward Operated Paratransit Program in an Amount Notto-Exceed $100,000 CONS 22-482 Staff report submitted by Assistant City Manager Ott, dated September 20, 2022, was filed.

It was moved by Council Member Wahab, seconded by Council Member Lamnin, and carried by the following roll call vote, to adopt the resolution.

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS Andrews, Lamnin, Márquez, Salinas, Wahab, Zermeño
MAYOR Halliday
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Resolution 22-231, “Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement with Nelson Nygaard Consulting Associates, to Provide Paratransit Consulting Services for the Hayward Operated Paratransit (HOP) Program in an Amount Not-to-Exceed $100,000”

8. Adopt Resolutions Authorizing the City Manager to 1) Execute a Professional Services Agreement with Raftelis to Prepare the FY24 and FY25 Water, Wastewater, Recycled Water Rate Studies and Connection Fee Study in an Amount Not-to-Exceed $200,000 and Transfer $10,000 from the Water Fund to Recycled Water Fund, and 2) Appropriate $200,000 from the Utilities Enterprise Funds CONS 22-508 6 | S e p t e m b e r 20 , 2 0 2 2
Staff report submitted by Public Works Director Ameri, dated September 20, 2022, was filed.

It was moved by Council Member Wahab, seconded by Council Member Lamnin, and carried by the following roll call vote, to adopt the resolutions.

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS Andrews, Lamnin, Márquez, Salinas, Wahab, Zermeño
MAYOR Halliday
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Resolution 22-232, “Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement with Raftelis to Prepare the FY24 and FY25 Water, Wastewater, Recycled Water Rate Study and Connection Fee Study in an Amount Not-to-Exceed $200,000 and Transfer $10,000 from Water Operating Fund to Recycled Water Operating Fund” Resolution 22-233, “Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Appropriate a Total of $200,000 for the FY24 and FY25 Water, Wastewater, Recycled Water Rate Study and Connection Fee Study”

9. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing a Grant Deed for the “MAE Parcel” of Tract 8428, SoHay, to the Hayward Area Recreation and Park District CONS 22-494 Staff report submitted by Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director Ott, dated September 20, 2022, was filed.

It was moved by Council Member Wahab, seconded by Council Member Lamnin, and carried by the following roll call vote, to adopt the resolution.

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS Andrews, Lamnin, Márquez, Salinas, Wahab, Zermeño
MAYOR Halliday
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Resolution 22-234, “Resolution Authorizing a Grant Deed for the MAE Parcel of Tract 8428, SoHay, to the Hayward Area Recreation and Park District (HARD)”

WORK SESSION

10. Firearms Regulations: Review and Discuss Regulations Related to Firearms WS 22-029 Staff report submitted by Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director Ott and Police Chief Chaplin, dated September 20, 2022, was filed.

Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director Ott announced the item and introduced Deputy Development Services Director Buizer who provided a synopsis of the staff report which included a recommendation against creating a formal buyback program given cost and program effectiveness concerns and insufficient staff capacity.

Mayor Halliday opened the public comment period at 8:08 p.m.

Mr. Pekon Gupta, Hayward resident, recommended putting in place conditions of purchase to limit the amount of ammunition that is purchased, such as requiring that weapons or proof of purchase of weapons be presented at a retailer to purchase ammunition or require an authorization letter from an entity such as the Police Department.

Mayor Halliday closed the public comment period at 8:10 p.m.

Discussion ensued among members of the City Council, Deputy Development Services Director Buizer, Deputy Police Chief Matthews, and Assistant City Manager Ott regarding:
amendments to firearms regulations; definition of firearms in the ordinance; buyback program; the establishments Security Six and Big 5 Sporting Goods; requirement to have gun sales videotaped; current policies addressing Concealed Carry Weapons (CCW); domestic violence restraining orders that allow police officers to seize firearms and notifications to schools involving child victims; and Planning Commission approval of conditional use permits for establishments that sell firearms.

Members of the City Council thanked City staff for the work done related to firearms regulations.

Council Member Zermeño recommended that the definition of gun in the ordinance be specifically defined to include ghost guns, revolvers, pistols, and rifles so non-English speakers can better understand the term; agreed with the comments made by Mr. Gupta about incorporating language in the ordinance about the purchase of ammunition, should language be considered about carrying weapons; and was in favor of having a formal buyback program.
8 | S e p t e m b e r 20 , 2 0 2 2
Council Member Andrews recommended, since it was not possible to have a formal buyback program due to staff capacity, looking at incentives such as gift cards for individuals to turn their firearms into the Police Department and advertise it as an ongoing program and investigate what outreach was done previously to receive private donations for the program.

Council Member Salinas acknowledged Mayor Halliday and Council Members Lamnin and Andrews for submitting a referral related to firearms regulations; requested to consider, when regulations return for Council’s review, incorporating language addressing BB guns; suggested, if staff recommends that the sale of guns be videotaped, that there be an analysis to include BB guns; recommended to add pre-schools to sensitive locations near which gun sales were prohibited; recommended that retail targeting the youth be included within the 1,000 feet buffer; requested that staff provide further analysis of the buyback program addressing cost and success rate; suggested that Mr. Gupta’s public comment about the condition of purchase to buy ammunition be evaluated when drafting the regulation.

Council Member Wahab was concerned a buyback program may result in a gun owner switching up weapons; suggested partnering with law enforcement agencies; had privacy concerns about the preservation of video footage capturing gun sales and did not want to infringe on people’s rights and recommended that staff engage American Civil Liberties Union, Moms Demand Action, Everytown USA and other stakeholders; was concerned about the purchase of pieces of a weapon to create an untraceable one and wanted to include this in the regulations; suggested reaching out to the Sheriff’s Department regarding plans for CCWs in Alameda County; requested further consideration for situations that trigger checks and balances and warning the school system to create safeguards for children; asked for actions that will be taken for individuals who do not have proper authority to be in possession of weapons; and for gun language to be broad and inclusive to allow for as many safeguards as possible.

Council Member Lamnin suggested that staff work with state and federal legislators through the legislative advocacy program and pull in surrendering guns, removing guns, and ammunition limitations; supported review of video surveillance and having regulations align with HARD’s regulations for public spaces during the strategic planning process and legislative policy update; supported having public information available on safe surrenders at any time and opportunities to get help as the mental health program is built out; and suggested seeking public input related to incentives and a potential formal buyback program funded through private organizations.

Council Member Márquez supported the implementation of a buyback program as a streamlined effort to have weapons dropped off at the Police Department; indicated there were opportunities to partner with the cities of Union City and Fremont; supported using funding from local foundations for gift cards to incentivize the program as well as City funds to get guns off the street; suggested launching the program in October 2023 during Intimate Partner and Domestic Violence Awareness Month; supported the proposed amendments to the Hayward Municipal Code; suggested adding parks and libraries to sensitive locations; encouraged connecting with state and federal legislators for policies

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
777 B Street, Hayward, CA 94541
Hybrid (Council Chamber) Virtual Platform (Zoom)
https://hayward.zoom.us/j/82458011571?pwd=R1FQQklzVUJTWFR4a01SRGkyRlBDUT09 Tuesday, September 20, 2022, 7:00 p.m.
that could be implemented to limit the number of guns on the streets; liked Mr. Gupta’s comments on limiting the quantity of ammunition purchased; requested that staff address Council feedback during discussion of strategic priorities; and acknowledged that there were short and long-term goals for the proposed policies.

Mayor Halliday appreciated the discussion and comments received; expressed concern about the use of firearms used in recent horrific incidents; supported the idea of having an ongoing program where weapons could be surrendered to the Police Department in exchange for a gift card; suggested adding a video surveillance requirement and perhaps a conditional use permit for any new firearms establishment; suggested consideration of prohibiting carrying guns on public property such as parks, schools, libraries and City facilities; and look into what local legislators are doing and partner with local agencies that are addressing firearms regulations.

Council Member Márquez shared for the public that due to the upcoming election, the City Council was in a transitional time, hence the pause on the conversation on firearms regulations and urged outgoing members to continue to be involved in future discussions.

COUNCIL REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
Council Member Zermeño announced the 12th annual Mariachi Festival which would be held at the City Hall Plaza on September 30, 2022.

Mayor Halliday reported that she attended the Cal Cities Annual Conference in Long Beach September 7 through September 9, 2022, as the City’s delegate, noted Cal Cities bylaws’ amendments were approved as proposed, noted a ballot initiative to strengthen local planning authority was referred to a policy committee, and spoke about sessions she attended.

Council Member Salinas reported that he also attended the Cal Cities Annual Conference and shared he attended a session on homelessness and shared that San Mateo County had a multimillion-dollar goal to house every single unhoused member of the county by the end of 2023 and another session around youth programming in partnership with public safety.

Mayor Halliday stated she attended a meeting held by Congressman Swalwell where he shared the Progress Report for the 117th Congress; and she thanked staff for organizing the Russell City Reparative Justice Project meeting on September 13, 2022.

Council Member Márquez shared that the Tennyson High School Puente Program would be holding a car show fundraiser on September 24, 2022 for its college tour program; noted the La Familia Counseling Service would be hosting its first annual golf tournament and dinner event on October 17, 2022 at Stonebrae; noted that residents who are a part of the 10 | S e p t e m b e r 20 , 202 2
East Bay Community Energy’s (EBCE) CARE and FERA programs should have received a $50 credit for the past month; as the representative on the Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District (ACMAD), reported there were no cases of the West Niles virus; and added that ACMAD joined the Hayward Area Shoreline Planning Agency (HASPA) to expand the joint powers agreement to help implement the Shoreline Adaptation Plan.

COUNCIL REFERRALS
There were none.

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Halliday adjourned the meeting at 9:16 p.m.

APPROVED
__________________________________________________________ Barbara Halliday
Mayor, City of Hayward
ATTEST:
__________________________________________________________ Miriam Lens
City Clerk, City of Hayward
CITY OF HAYWARD Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
File #: MIN 22-116
DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Clerk

SUBJECT
Approve the City Council Minutes of the City Council Meeting on September 27, 2022

RECOMMENDATION
That the Council approves the City Council meeting minutes of September 27, 2022

SUMMARY
The City Council held a meeting on September 27, 2022.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I Draft Minutes of September 27, 2022
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 1 of 1 Printed on 10/6/2022
powered by Legistar™

The City Council meeting was called to order by Mayor Halliday at 7:00 p.m. The City Council held a hybrid meeting in Council Chambers and virtually via Zoom.

Pledge of Allegiance: Council Member Márquez
Present
Council Chamber: Council Members Salinas, Zermeño
Mayor Halliday
Virtual Platform (Zoom): Council Members Andrews, Lamnin, Márquez, Wahab

Absent: None

CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENT
The City Council convened in closed session on September 27, 2022, at 6:00 p.m., with all members present, regarding conference with property negotiators pursuant to Government Code section 54956.8 regarding Matt Jimenez Community Center, 28200 Ruus Road; APN:
465-0001-009-05. City Attorney Lawson announced that Council gave direction to its negotiating team but took no reportable action. The closed session adjourned at 6:48 p.m.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mr. Don Hokett, Northern California Carpenters Local Union 713 representative, spoke in favor of adding aerial lift standards to the City’s prequalification language to show that builders are valued in Hayward and wanted to engage with the Council and developers to show how to cultivate a prosperous construction industry.

CITY MANAGER’S COMMENTS
There were none.

CONSENT

1. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Amendment to the Existing Professional Services Agreement with Federal Engineering to Expand the Scope of Work to Include Ongoing Implementation Support Related to Dispatcher Hiring and Recruitment to Support the Hayward Evaluation and Response Team Program and to Increase the Contract Amount by $74,500, Not-To-Exceed $187,222 CONS 22-492 Staff report submitted by City Manager McAdoo, dated September 27, 2022, was filed.
2 | S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 2
It was moved by Council Member Zermeño, seconded by Council Member Lamnin, and carried by the following roll call vote, to adopt the resolution.

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS Andrews, Lamnin, Márquez, Salinas, Wahab, Zermeño
MAYOR Halliday
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Resolution 22-235, “Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Amendment to the Agreement with Federal Engineering for an Additional $74,500 to Include the Hiring of Subject Matter Expert(S) and Additional Support Staff to Implement Pilot Project Recommendations Not-to-Exceed $187,222”

2. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with the East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) for the Implementation of the City/EBMUD Jointly Prepared East Bay Plain Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan CONS 22- 506
Staff report submitted by Public Works Director Ameri, dated September 27, 2022, was filed.

It was moved by Council Member Zermeño, seconded by Council Member Lamnin, and carried by the following roll call vote, to adopt the resolution.

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS Andrews, Lamnin, Márquez, Salinas, Wahab, Zermeño
MAYOR Halliday
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Resolution 22-236, “Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with the East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) for the Implementation of the City/EBMUD Jointly Prepared East Bay Plain Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan”

3. Adopt a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the City of Hayward Salary Plan for Fiscal Year 2023 CONS 22-507
Staff report submitted by Assistant City Manager/ Interim Human Resources Director Youngblood, dated September 27, 2022, was filed.

It was moved by Council Member Zermeño, seconded by Council Member Lamnin, and carried by the following roll call vote, to adopt the resolution.

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS Andrews, Lamnin, Márquez, Salinas, Wahab, Zermeño
MAYOR Halliday
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Resolution 22-237, “Resolution Approving the Amended Fiscal Year 2023 Salary Plan Designating Salary Ranges for Positions of Employment in the City of Hayward; and Superseding Resolution No. 22-188 and all Amendments Thereto”

4. Adopt Resolutions Authorizing the Sole Source Purchase of a Hydro Vactor from Owen Equipment Sales in an Amount Not-to-Exceed $412,000 and Appropriating Additional Funds CONS 22-518
Staff report submitted by Public Works Director Ameri, dated September 27, 2022, was filed.

It was moved by Council Member Zermeño, seconded by Council Member Lamnin, and carried by the following roll call vote, to adopt the resolutions.

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS Andrews, Lamnin, Márquez, Salinas, Wahab, Zermeño
MAYOR Halliday
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Resolution 22-238, “Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Sole Source Purchase of a Hydro Vactor from Owen Equipment Sales in an Amount Not-to-Exceed $412,000”
Resolution 22-239, “Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Appropriate Additional Funds in an Amount Up to $12,000 from the Sewer Replacement Fund”
4 | S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 2

5. Adopt a Resolution Allowing the City Council and Appointed Commissions/Task Forces and Council Committees to Hold Continued Teleconferenced Public Meetings Pursuant to AB 361 CONS 22-532
Staff report submitted by City Manager McAdoo and City Clerk Lens, dated September 27, 2022, was filed.

It was moved by Council Member Zermeño, seconded by Council Member Lamnin, and carried by the following roll call vote, to adopt the resolution.

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS Andrews, Lamnin, Márquez, Salinas, Wahab, Zermeño
MAYOR Halliday
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Resolution 22-240, “Resolution Making the Required Findings Pursuant to AB 361 to Continue to Hold Teleconferenced Public Meetings During the COVID 19 State of Emergency”

6. Adopt a Resolution Accepting the Resignation of Ms. Lacei Ramirez-Amodei from the Community Services Commission, Effective Immediately CONS 22-533 Staff report submitted by City Clerk Lens, dated September 27, 2022, was filed.

It was moved by Council Member Zermeño, seconded by Council Member Lamnin, and carried by the following roll call vote, to adopt the resolution.

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS Andrews, Lamnin, Márquez, Salinas, Wahab, Zermeño
MAYOR Halliday
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Resolution 22-241, “Resolution Accepting the Resignation of Ms. Lacei Ramirez Amodei from the Community Services Commission”

7. Adopt a Resolution Appointing Ms. Elena Lepe to the Community Services Commission to Fill the Unexpired Term of Ms. Lacei Ramirez-Amodei CONS 22-534 Staff report submitted by City Clerk Lens, dated September 27, 2022, was filed.

It was moved by Council Member Zermeño, seconded by Council Member Lamnin, and carried by the following roll call vote, to adopt the resolution.

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS Andrews, Lamnin, Márquez, Salinas, Wahab, Zermeño
MAYOR Halliday
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Resolution 22-242, “Resolution Appointing Ms. Elena Lepe to the Community Services Commission to Fill the Unexpired Term of Ms.

Lacei Ramirez Amodei”

WORK SESSION

8. Fireworks: Update on Implementation of Hayward’s Enhanced Approach to Education and Enforcement of Its Fireworks Ban WS 22-028
Staff report submitted by Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director Ott, dated September 27, 2022, was filed.

Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director Ott announced the item and introduced Deputy Development Services Director Buizer who provided an update on the implementation of the two ordinances related to fireworks, community outreach, education efforts, and enforcement of fireworks ban. Deputy Police Chief Matthews provide an overview of the challenges from a public safety and enforcement perspective.

Mayor Halliday opened the public comment period at 7:32 p.m.

Mr. Frank Goulart noted that the fireworks issue was year-round and occurred on other significant holidays, suggested a concerted effort by law enforcement agencies throughout the Bay Area and recommended that staff from different departments work together, similar to how the graffiti abatement was addressed.

Ms. TJ, with Hayward Concerned Citizens, wondered if drone technology could be used for areas that were identified as being problematic and asked if the revenue generated from citation fines would be used towards paying for Police Department overtime. 6 | S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 2
Ms. Patricia expressed concern about fireworks being used at community parks, shared this year there was a fire at Christian Penke Park and a resident’s yard caught on fire, and stated the area was not patrolled on the Fourth of July holiday and the park was not zoned off to prevent illegal activity.

Mayor Halliday closed the public comment period at 7:40 p.m.

Deputy Development Services Director Buizer addressed public comments indicating: staff could explore opportunities to address other holidays where such activities are occurring; staff could reach out to neighboring cities to gauge interest for a regional approach; no funds had been received from citations yet and there were still overtime costs to pay; parks have provisions banning fireworks citywide and lack of resources was the main issue in not being able to enforce the regulations; and forming partnerships with neighboring cities and leveraging resources was a good approach. Deputy Police Chief Matthews stated that it may be possible to use drones for firework enforcement ensuring the use aligns with its policy and noted that although officers are scheduled to work on the Fourth of July and New Year’s Eve holidays, the challenge is limited capacity.

Discussion ensued among members of the City and City staff regarding: citations for violations and failure to pay them may result in property liens; staff was not aware of any staff injuries that had resulted from the enforcement; notices were mailed to 68,267 parcel addresses that were identified as areas prone to ongoing illegal fireworks activity in addition to the dual-language notices included as water bill inserts that had been disseminated to residents throughout the city; potential budget increase as part of the future budget process based on Council direction; staff was open to feedback to improve the program and noted that hearing fees were developed based on a Nexus study assessing user fees; equipment used to capture violation during the holiday such as body worn and cell phone cameras; and additional training for staff.

Members of the City Council commended staff for the pilot project; thanked the multidepartment efforts around education and social media campaign, posting of signage throughout the city, and other means of spreading awareness, which resulted in decrease of fireworks activity; and thanked community members for their input.

Council Member Zermeño offered the following suggestions/comments: consider expanding the number of ‘no fireworks” signs posted throughout the city; share information, through the educational component of the program, on why there is no longer fireworks shows in Hayward and share information on places that hold fireworks shows in the Bay Area; consider increasing the fine for individuals who violate the fireworks ordinance for consecutive years; and noted that fireworks should be lit where they are purchased.

Council Member Andrews offered the following suggestions/comments: reach out to jurisdictions like Union City to explore a collaboration as they were also conflicted with illegal fireworks activity; look into the sales of fireworks through social media companies and hold them accountable for the activity; explore partnering with HARD to increase the

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
777 B Street, Hayward, CA 94541
Hybrid (Council Chamber) Virtual Platform (Zoom)
https://hayward.zoom.us/j/85407475291?pwd=MzZiVDdBWjNJSTVOdFkrOTYwVnhLUT09 Tuesday, September 27, 2022, 7:00 p.m.
number of employees working holidays to assist the Police Department with enforcement and reporting violations occurring on park premises; partner with HUSD and local colleges to tackle illegal fireworks activity; have staff set up tents in shopping center parking lots to engage shoppers about fireworks policies; engage state and federal representatives to determine a solution to activities occurring all year round and impacting people’s quality of life; and explore establishing a hotline that residents can uses to report on other noncompliant residents.

Council Member Salinas offered the following suggestions/comments: place a message at the bottom of business receipts to indicate that fireworks are illegal; place signage at booths where fireworks are sold and at bordering streets between Hayward and Union City; noted the primary goal was to curb the illegal use of professional grade fireworks which impact the elderly, pets and individuals suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD); saturate the neighborhoods that were identified in the heat map with notices in utilities bills and signage and have strategic enforcement consisting of Police and Fire personnel presence; look into creating an alternative event on the Fourth of July holiday aimed at steering people away from illegal fireworks, such as a light parade or similar light exposition/laser light display in downtown or at one of the corridors; and explore alternative options to spending an exorbitant amount of money on enforcement.

Mayor Halliday commented that a show with laser projections may be feasible at the future Stack Center or on the hills at La Vista Park.

Council Member Wahab offered the following suggestions/comments: highlight major holidays and sporting events when illegal fireworks commonly occur; work with the Hayward Unified School District to educate students through a flyer in multiple languages that students be required to have parents sign or teachers’ announcements discouraging unauthorized fireworks; consider a mechanism of issuing warnings before charging fines; do not fully support engaging a “street team” but preferred that more City staff have the ability to issue citations; disseminate notifications through social media and via email in multiple languages as this approach is more cost-effective to distributing citywide mailers; include a message in the annual report issued by the City Manager indicating fireworks are not permitted in the city; cautioned on the use of equipment to capture footage and become a surveillance state; make sure the information collected from the public to write citations is verified to ensure that data is current and accurate; use electronic billboards near freeways and at Southland Mall to display “no fireworks” messages a month prior to holidays.

Council Member Márquez offered the following suggestions/comments: consider adding the topic of fireworks to the list of legislative priorities for state and federal lobbyists; partner with HUSD to disseminate information through HUSD’s newsletter; concurred with outreach efforts via pop-up booths at Target and other grocery stores with high traffic; 8 | S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 2 2
engage volunteers through Hayward Neighborhood Alert leading up to major holidays; include a writeup in the Stack newsletter on a quarterly basis to underscore that fireworks are illegal in Hayward; continue to fine offenders as long as there is evidence, and consider some leniency by allowing installment payments; collaborate with HARD to tackle hot spot parks and perhaps HARD can explore hiring temporary staff to have an increased presence at parks; the fireworks issue is a priority as it impacts the quality of life for residents, pets and individuals suffering with depression, anxiety, and PTSD; continue to send messages to the community emphasizing that illegal fireworks are not permitted in Hayward; and collaborate with Union City to address ongoing fireworks problem.

Council Member Lamnin offered the following suggestions: partner with HUSD on outreach through Peachjar; ensure that M-80 firecrackers and sales of fireworks through social media are added to the legislative advocacy agenda to ensure lobbyists are paying attention to regional issues; consider displaying messages through Comcast billboards; consider having Animal Services provide information at their events on how to help pets that have been conditioned to have strong reactions; engage Hayward Neighborhood Alert, Community Emergency Response Team(CERT), Neighborhood Emergency Response Team (NERT) volunteers to assist with outreach events and help activate the hot spot parks such as host a glowstick event in the evening; have a regional approach; wondered if fireworks sales booths in Union City would sell laser lights instead of M-80 firecrackers; urged residents to talk to their community groups to see if they would be interested in hosting laser lights shows, and perhaps the City could be of assistance with grants and permitting process for supporting community events.

Mayor Halliday expressed the following suggestions/comments: fireworks are most intense on the Fourth of July holiday; supported drone coverage for areas with intense activity to help get attention to those areas and underscored how dangerous these activities can get; supported partnering with HUSD to get information out; stated she thought Union City sold smaller scale fireworks like sparklers which are different than M80 firecrackers which impact pets and individuals suffering from PTSD; favored more City staff in addition to police officers, being present and helping with enforcement on other holidays such as New Year’s Eve; suggested that staff work on a budget proposal and express that resources need to be directed towards dealing with fireworks issues; and stated that the program would improve every year and that over time, there would be a reduction in fireworks activities.

COUNCIL REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
Council Member Márquez encouraged all to subscribe to the Leaflet, the City’s Environmental Newsletter, and shared the current issue featured the City made the Environmental Protection Agency’s top 30 list for on-site generators of renewable energy, had a quiz on how to recycle, and information on free mattress and box spring disposal; and as the City’s representative to East Bay Community Energy (EBCE), she reported that EBCE voted to expand its service to Stockton in San Joaquin County.

Council Member Salinas announced the 12th annual Hayward Mariachi Festival on September 30, 2022, at City Hall Plaza.

Council Member Zermeño announced the Ballet Folklorico of Winton Middle School and Mariachi Mexicanisimo would be performing at the Hayward Mariachi Festival.

Council Member Andrews announced the Science in the Park event at Cal State East Bay on October 1. 2022.

COUNCIL REFERRALS
There were none.

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Halliday adjourned the meeting at 8:52 p.m., in memory of Ms. Deanna Bogue and Ms.

Betty Moose.

Ms. Deanna Bogue was a longtime Southgate resident, was involved in the Southgate Area Homeowners Association, was an active member of the Hayward Neighborhood Alert Program and the Greater Hayward Democratic Club and thoughts were sent to her son Ed Bogue who represents the city on the Oakland Airport Noise Forum and the Alameda County Airport Land Use Commission.

Ms. Betty Moose, San Lorenzo resident, was a founder of Ruby’s Place and Hayward Shoreline Advocates, was a member of the Hayward Shoreline Planning Agency, and volunteered with the Hayward Area Recreation District and the Eden Area League of Women Voters.

Mayor Halliday asked City staff to work with their families and dedicate a tree in their honor.

APPROVED
__________________________________________________________ Barbara Halliday
Mayor, City of Hayward
ATTEST:
__________________________________________________________ Miriam Lens
City Clerk, City of Hayward
CITY OF HAYWARD Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
File #: CONS 22-547
DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Clerk

SUBJECT
Adopt a Resolution Accepting the Resignation of Mr. Roy Mick Rubio from the Community Services Commission, Effective Immediately

RECOMMENDATION
That the Council adopts a resolution (Attachment II) accepting the resignation of Mr. Roy Mick Rubio from the Community Services Commission, effective immediately.

SUMMARY
Mr. Roy Mick Rubio was appointed to the Community Services Commission on September 15, 2020. Mr.

Roy Mick Rubio’s resignation becomes effective immediately, per his resignation letter (Attachment III).

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
Attachment III Resignation Letter
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 1 of 1 Printed on 10/6/2022
powered by Legistar™

Page 1 of 1 ends

DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Clerk
SUBJECT Adopt a Resolution Accepting the Resignation of Mr. Roy Mick Rubio from the Community Services Commission, Effective Immediately

RECOMMENDATION
That the Council adopts a resolution (Attachment II) accepting the resignation of Mr. Roy Mick Rubio from the Community Services Commission, effective immediately.

SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION
Mr. Roy Mick Rubio was appointed to the Community Services Commission on September 15, 2020. Mr. Roy Mick Rubio’s resignation becomes effective immediately, per his resignation letter (Attachment III).

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

STRATEGIC ROADMAP
The agenda item is a routine operational item and does not relate to one of the Council’s Strategic Roadmap.

Prepared and Recommended by: Miriam Lens, City Clerk
Approved by:
_________________________________
Kelly McAdoo, City Manager

ATTACHMENT II

Page 1 of 1 ends

HAYWARD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION No. 22-______
Introduced by Council Member ______________
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE RESIGNATION OF MR. ROY MICK RUBIO

FROM THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION
WHEREAS, Mr. Roy Mick Rubio was appointed to the Community Services Commission on September 15, 2020;
WHEREAS, Mr. Roy Mick Rubio submitted a resignation letter on September 23, 2022.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hayward that the Council hereby accepts the resignation of Mr. Roy Mick Rubio; and commends him for his civic service to the City.

IN COUNCIL, HAYWARD, CALIFORNIA, ________________2022.

ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MAYOR:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: ______________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Hayward
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________________
City Attorney of the City of Hayward
September 23, 2022
Via E-Mail Only
Jessica Lobedan
Acting Community Services Manager
City of Hayward
777 B Street, 4th Floor
Hayward, CA 94541
[email protected]
Miriam Lens
City Clerk
City of Hayward
777 B Street, 4th Floor
Hayward, CA 94541
[email protected]
Dear Manager Lobedan and City Clerk Lens:

I write to advise of my resignation as Commissioner from the City of Hayward’s Community Services Commission, effective immediately. It truly has been a great joy to meet and work with commissioners and city staff who are so dedicated to the City of Hayward. I look forward to learning about and seeing the good work that the CSC will undoubtedly continue to do.

Very Truly Yours,
R. Mick Rubio
CC:

Via E-Mail Only
Michael Lawson
City Attorney
City of Hayward
777 B Street, 4th Floor
Hayward, CA 94541
[email protected]

ATTACHMENT III
CITY OF HAYWARD Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
File #: CONS 22-548
DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Clerk

SUBJECT
Adopt a Resolution Appointing Ms. Elaine Alvite to the Community Services Commission to Fill the Unexpired Term of Mr. Roy Mick Rubio

RECOMMENDATION
That the Council adopts a resolution (Attachment II) appointing Ms. Elaine Alvite to the Community Services Commission to fill the unexpired term of Mr. Roy Mick Rubio, which will expire on September 30, 2024.

SUMMARY
Following the July 12, 2022 City Commission interviews, the Council established an alternate list comprising eligible applicants who were not selected to fill vacancies because they were not enough vacant seats to appoint them. The alternate list comprises three Hayward residents who were nominated for specific commissions as follows: Ms. Elena Lepe (Community Services Commission); Ms. Elaine Alvite (Community Services Commission); and Ms. Arti Garg (Planning Commission). The alternate list will be valid for one year and will expire at the beginning of the new recruitment process. On September 23, 2022, Mr. Roy Mick Rubio, now former member of the Community Services Commission, submitted a letter of resignation which created an unexpected vacancy on the Community Services Commission. The Council, during its September 20, 2022 Council meeting, confirmed the list of alternates for two commissions. On September 27, 202, Ms. Elena Lepe was appointed to fill an unexpected vacancy. Ms.

Elaine Alvite, who is a Community Services Commission alternate, was contacted to confirm her eligibility status and her interest in serving on the Community Services Commission. If appointed to the Community Services Commission, Ms. Elaine Alvite’s term would be effective immediately and would end on September 30, 2024.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment IIResolution
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 1 of 2 Printed on 10/6/2022
powered by Legistar™
File #: CONS 22-548
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 2 of 2 Printed on 10/6/2022
powered by Legistar™

Page 1 of 2 ends

DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Clerk

SUBJECT
Adopt a Resolution Appointing Ms. Elaine Alvite to the Community Services Commission to Fill the Unexpired Term of Mr. Roy Mick Rubio

SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION
Following the July 12, 2022 City Commission interviews, the Council established an alternate list comprising eligible applicants who were not selected to fill vacancies because they were not enough vacant seats to appoint them. The alternate list comprises three Hayward residents who were nominated for specific commissions as follows: Ms. Elena Lepe (Community Services Commission); Ms. Elaine Alvite (Community Services Commission); and Ms. Arti Garg (Planning Commission). The alternate list will be valid for one year and will expire at the beginning of the new recruitment process. On September 23, 2022, Mr. Roy Mick Rubio, now former member of the Community Services Commission, submitted a letter of resignation which created an unexpected vacancy on the Community Services Commission.

The Council, during its September 20, 20221 Council meeting, confirmed the list of alternates for two commissions. On September 27, 202, Ms. Elena Lepe was appointed to fill an unexpected vacancy. Ms. Elaine Alvite, who is a Community Services Commission alternate, was contacted to confirm her eligibility status and her interest in serving on the Community Services Commission. If appointed to the Community Services Commission, Ms. Elaine Alvite’s term would be effective immediately and would end on September 30, 2024.

1 September 20, 2022 Council Meeting -
https://hayward.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5844303&GUID=FE76B8E2-8EF5-4E37-9DB5- 5D2E33887DBD&Options=&Search=

Page 2 of 2 ends

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

STRATEGIC ROADMAP
This agenda item is a routine operational item and does not relate to any of the projects outlined in the Council’s Strategic Roadmap.

NEXT STEPS
Following Council’s action, the oath of affirmation will be administered to Ms. Alvite prior to her first Community Services Commission meeting.

Prepared and Recommended by: Miriam Lens, City Clerk
Approved by:
_________________________________
Kelly McAdoo, City Manager

ATTACHMENT II

Page 1 of 2 ends

HAYWARD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION No. 22-__________
Introduced by Council Member ________________
RESOLUTION APPOINTING MS. ELAINE ALVITE TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION TO FILL THE UNEXPIRED TERM OF MR. ROY MICK RUBIO
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted its annual recruitment for City commissions and the Keep Hayward Clean and Green Task Force from April 5, 2022 through June 16, 2022; and
WHEREAS, on July 12, 2022, the City Council interviewed applicants to fill vacancies on the Community Services Commission, Library Commission, and Personnel Commission; and
WHEREAS, following the interviews, the City Council established an alternate list comprising eligible applicants who were not selected to fill vacancies because they were not enough seats to appoint them; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Elaine Alvite was nominated as an alternate for the Community Services Commission; and
WHEREAS, Community Services Commissioner Roy Mick Rubio resigned, effective September 23, 2022, which created a vacancy on the Community Services Commission.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hayward that Ms.

Elaine Alvite is selected from the alternate list and appointed to fill Mr. Roy Mick Rubio’s unexpired term, which will expire on September 30, 2024.

ATTACHMENT II

Page 2 of 2 ends

IN COUNCIL, HAYWARD, CALIFORNIA _______________________, 2022.

ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MAYOR:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: ______________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Hayward
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________________
City Attorney of the City of Hayward
CITY OF HAYWARD Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
File #: CONS 22-559
DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Clerk

SUBJECT
Adopt a Resolution Accepting the Resignation of Ms. Linda Xu from the Keep Hayward Clean and Green Task Force, Effective Immediately

RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopts a resolution (Attachment II) accepting the resignation of Ms. Linda Xu from the Keep Hayward Clean and Green Task Force, effective immediately.

SUMMARY
Ms. Linda Xu was appointed to the Keep Hayward Clean and Green Task Force on September 21, 2021.

Ms. Xu’s resignation becomes effective immediately per her resignation letter dated September 30, 2022 (Attachment III). Ms. Xu’s vacated position will be filled as part of the annual appointment process for the City’s appointed officials to Commissions and Keep Hayward Clean and Green Task Force.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
Attachment III Resignation Letter
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 1 of 1 Printed on 10/6/2022
powered by Legistar™

Page 1 of 2 ends

DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Clerk
SUBJECT Adopt a Resolution Accepting the Resignation of Ms. Linda Xu from the Keep Hayward Clean and Green Task Force, Effective Immediately

RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopts a resolution (Attachment II) accepting the resignation of Ms. Linda Xu from the Keep Hayward Clean and Green Task Force, effective immediately.

SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION
Ms. Linda Xu was appointed to the Keep Hayward Clean and Green Task Force on September 21, 2021. Ms. Xu’s resignation becomes effective immediately per her resignation letter dated September 30, 2022 (Attachment III).

Ms. Xu’s vacated position will be filled as part of the annual appointment process for the City’s appointed officials to Commissions and Keep Hayward Clean and Green Task Force.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

STRATEGIC ROADMAP
This agenda item is a routine operational item and does not relate to any of the projects outlined in the Council’s Strategic Roadmap.

Page 2 of 2 ends

Prepared and Recommended by: Miriam Lens, City Clerk
Approved by:
_________________________________
Kelly McAdoo, City Manager

ATTACHMENT II

HAYWARD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION No. 22-_______
Introduced by Council Member ________________
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE RESIGNATION OF MS. LINDA XU FROM THE

KEEP HAYWARD CLEAN AND GREEN TASK FORCE
WHEREAS, Ms. Linda Xu was appointed to the Keep Hayward Clean and Green Task Force on September 21, 2021; and
WHEREAS, Ms. Linda Xu submitted a resignation letter on September 30, 2022.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hayward that the Council hereby accepts the resignation of Ms. Linda Xu; and commends her for her civic service to the City.

IN COUNCIL, HAYWARD, CALIFORNIA, ________________________ ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MAYOR:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: ______________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Hayward
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________________
City Attorney of the City of Hayward

ATTACHMENT III
From: Linda Xu
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2022 6:58 AM
To: Colleen Kamai <[email protected]>; Miriam Lens <[email protected]> Subject: Resignation from KHCG task force Request
CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.

Hi Miriam and Colleen,
I have enjoyed getting to know the team and seeing work being done for the city of Hayward. It has been a challenge for me to be provide the time and effort that the task force and subcommittees require and deserve. I was diagnosed with some health issues that causes me a lot of pain and exhaustion and the hours we end up needing to serve at each event is a lot for me and my doctor has advised that I do not over do it.

I hope that after treatment things look better and I can return to help.

Thank you,
Linda Xu
CITY OF HAYWARD Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
File #: CONS 22-542
DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works

SUBJECT
Adopt a Resolution Approving Addendums No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3, Accepting the Bid Protest, and Awarding a Contract to Blocka Construction, Inc., for the Water Pollution Control Facility Switchgear Rehabilitation Project No. 07656, in an Amount Not-to Exceed $13,169,800, and Appropriating Additional Funds in the Amount of $2,669,635

RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopts the attached resolution (Attachment II):

1. Approving Addendums No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3, providing minor revisions to the project plans and specifications, accepting the bid protest of Mountain Cascade, Inc. (Mountain Cascade), and awarding a contract to Blocka Construction, Inc. (Blocka) for the Water Pollution Control Facility (WPCF) Switchgear Rehabilitation Project No. 07656, in an amount not-to-exceed $13,169,800; and

2. Appropriating additional funds in the amount of $2,669,635 from the Sewer System Replacement Fund (Fund 611).

These include the headworks screening and pumping facilities, grit and scum removal through the vacuators, the primary treatment process, the secondary treatment process (west trickling filter), the anerobic digesters, the fats, oils and grease (FOG) receiving station, the site waste pump station, site lighting, and various buildings including the Operations Control House and the Administration Building.

Concern over continued reliability of the switchgear due to obsolescence and availability of parts, as well as the current condition and continued deterioration from corrosive atmospheres, prompted staff to request CITY OF HAYWARD Page 1 of 2 Printed on 10/6/2022
powered by Legistar™
File #: CONS 22-542
that the electrical system be evaluated as part of the WPCF Phase II Facilities Plan. The Phase II Facilities Plan, completed in June of 2020, serves as a comprehensive planning document for the WPCF infrastructure needs for the next twenty-five years. An evaluation of the Old Cogeneration Building housing the switchgear, as well as the switchgear itself was performed as part of the planning effort. The evaluation recommended replacing the existing MSB, several existing aged MCCs, and an existing 12-kV to 480-volt transformer that is severely corroded and at risk of failure, as well as retrofitting the existing old Cogeneration Building to house the new electrical equipment.

On August 30, 2022, three (3) bids were received, ranging from $9,936,440 to $11,452,000. Anvil Builders, Inc. (Anvil) submitted the low bid of $9,936,440, which was 18.6% below the Engineer’s estimate of $12,200,000. Mountain Cascade submitted the second low bid of $10,345,136. Blocka submitted the third lowest bid of $11,452,000.

On September 6, 2022, a bid protest was submitted by Mountain Cascade alleging that the low bidder did not demonstrate the required experience and qualifications for the electrical subcontractor required by the project specifications. Upon review of the bids, staff determined that bids submitted by Anvil and Mountain Cascade were both non-responsive because both contractors failed to demonstrate the required project experience. Therefore, staff recommends that the construction contract be awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, Blocka.

Staff is requesting Council’s approval of Addendums No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3, which provided minor revisions to clarify the plans and specifications and awarding the construction contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, Blocka, in the amount not-to-exceed $13,169,800, including Administrative Change Orders.

Furthermore, staff is requesting appropriation of additional funds in the amount of $2,669,635 from the Sewer System Replacement Fund (Fund 611).

This project is categorically exempt from environmental review under Section 15301(c) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines for the operation, repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing facilities.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 2 of 2 Printed on 10/6/2022
powered by Legistar™

Page 1 of 12 ends

DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Approving Addendums No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3, Accepting the Bid Protest, and Awarding a Contract to Blocka Construction, Inc., for the Water Pollution Control Facility Switchgear Rehabilitation Project No. 07656, in an Amount Not-to Exceed $13,169,800, and Appropriating Additional Funds in the Amount of $2,669,635

RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopts the attached resolution (Attachment II):

2. Appropriating additional funds in the amount of $2,669,635 from the Sewer System Replacement Fund (Fund 611).

SUMMARY
The WPCF treats an annual average flow of approximately eleven million gallons per day (MGD) and meets current requirements to discharge treated effluent to the deep waters of the San Francisco Bay. Originally installed in 1982, the existing main switchgear (MSB), is a key component of the power distribution system at the WPCF. The MSB along with several related 480-volt motor control centers (MCCs) and 480-volt distribution panelboards have provided power and controls to vital plant facilities for nearly forty years. These include the headworks screening and pumping facilities, grit and scum removal through the vacuators, the primary treatment process, the secondary treatment process (west trickling filter), the anerobic digesters, the fats, oils and grease (FOG) receiving station, the site waste pump station, site lighting, and various buildings including the Operations Control House and the Administration Building. Concern over continued reliability of the switchgear due to obsolescence and

Page 2 of 12 ends

availability of parts, as well as the current condition and continued deterioration from corrosive atmospheres, prompted staff to request that the electrical system be evaluated as part of the WPCF Phase II Facilities Plan. The Phase II Facilities Plan, completed in June of 2020, serves as a comprehensive planning document for the WPCF infrastructure needs for the next twenty-five years. An evaluation of the Old Cogeneration Building housing the switchgear, as well as the switchgear itself was performed as part of the planning effort. The evaluation recommended replacing the existing MSB, several existing aged MCCs, and an existing 12-kV to 480-volt transformer that is severely corroded and at risk of failure, as well as retrofitting the existing old Cogeneration Building to house the new electrical equipment.

On August 30, 2022, three (3) bids were received, ranging from $9,936,440 to $11,452,000.

Anvil Builders, Inc. (Anvil) submitted the low bid of $9,936,440, which was 18.6% below the Engineer’s estimate of $12,200,000. Mountain Cascade submitted the second low bid of $10,345,136. Blocka submitted the third lowest bid of $11,452,000.

On September 6, 2022, a bid protest was submitted by Mountain Cascade alleging that the low bidder did not demonstrate the required experience and qualifications for the electrical subcontractor required by the project specifications. Upon review of the bids, staff determined that bids submitted by Anvil and Mountain Cascade were both nonresponsive because both contractors failed to demonstrate the required project experience.

Therefore, staff recommends that the construction contract be awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, Blocka.

Staff is requesting Council’s approval of Addendums No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3, which provided minor revisions to clarify the plans and specifications and awarding the construction contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, Blocka, in the amount not-toexceed $13,169,800, including Administrative Change Orders.

Furthermore, staff is requesting appropriation of additional funds in the amount of $2,669,635 from the Sewer System Replacement Fund (Fund 611).

BACKGROUND
The WPCF collects and treats wastewater from the City’s residents and businesses. The original WPCF 480-volt MSB was designed to power the entire WPCF at the time of its construction and was connected directly to two cogeneration engines that satisfied part of the plant demand, and a standby generator as a backup power supply to PG&E. In 2008, the Phase 1 WCPF upgrade project was completed that included a new electrical service entrance from PG&E, a new 12-kV switchgear building, a 12-kV power grid, several 12-kV substations to distribute power around the plant, and a new standby diesel generator. The

Page 3 of 12 ends

electrical system upgrades were largely constructed to serve new loads added as part of the Phase 1 project and other than sub-feeding the power from the new 12-kV switchgear to the MSB, did not include improvements to the plant’s existing 480-volt power distribution system. In 2014, a new 1,132 kW cogeneration engine was commissioned as part of the Cogeneration Upgrade Project, and the old cogeneration engines that previously supplied power to the plant through the MSB were decommissioned. The MSB continues to supply power to many vital loads throughout the plant including the headworks, north and south vacuators, the primary treatment process, the west trickling filter, the anerobic digesters, the site waste pump station, the fats, oils and grease (FOG) receiving station, and various buildings and site lighting.

On February 27, 20181, Council authorized a professional services agreement (PSA) with Black and Veatch to prepare the WPCF Phase II Facilities Plan that serves as a comprehensive planning document for the WPCF infrastructure needs for the next twentyfive years. An evaluation of the MSB and the old cogeneration facility was performed as part of the planning effort. The Facilities Plan recommended replacing the existing MSB, several related motor control centers and distribution panel boards, a 12-kV to 480-volt transformer, and related electrical equipment, along with retrofitting the building to house the new electrical equipment.

On May 18, 20212, Council authorized a PSA with Carollo Engineers to perform final design services for the WPCF Switchgear Rehabilitation Project. The scope of work included preliminary and final design services of the switchgear and other related improvements.

PROJECT SCOPE
The recommendations from the Phase II Facilities Plan are to replace the plant’s existing MSB, several MCCs and distribution panelboards, and related equipment. The existing electrical equipment, installed in 1982, have exceeded their useful lives. In addition, staff have difficulty procuring replacement parts, as the parts are no longer produced for equipment this old. The existing MSB is at risk of failure due to long-term exposure to hydrogen sulfide and the resulting corrosion of its copper bussing. Replacement is needed for continued operational reliability of the WPCF and many of its essential processes.

The project includes the following components:
 Main Switchgear (MSB): The MSB was installed in 1982, and at forty years in service has exceeded its useful life. Staff have difficulty procuring replacement parts since they are obsolete and no longer being produced. In 2006, an assessment of the existing MSB equipment was performed by Terada Engineering, Inc., which recommended replacement of switchgear components due to component

1 https://hayward.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3354003&GUID=015931F3-41B1-45E5-8345- F8440FF11A26&Options=&Search=
2 https://hayward.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4955268&GUID=821E06AC-AAAD-450F-8B45- 0A98D661D498&Options=&Search=

Page 4 of 12 ends

obsolescence. This assessment also noted that the switchgear was housed within a room that was subjected to significant levels of hydrogen sulfide due to its proximity to the East Barminutor Structure where two of the City’s main sewer lines converge.

In 2020, as part of the WPCF Phase II Facilities Plan, an evaluation was completed that confirmed the previous findings that recommended replacing the MSB.  Motor Control Centers (MCCs): Several of the existing motor control centers (MCCs) powered by the MSB were evaluated and recommended for replacement due to their age and obsolescence. These MCCs were installed at the same time the MSB (1982) and are also at the end of their useful life. These include the obsolete MCC5B which primarily includes breakers and starters associated with the old, decommissioned cogeneration equipment, MCC-5A which supplies equipment located in the boiler room, several obsolete pump control panels serving the flow equalization return pumps. In addition, a nearby outdoor MCC (MCC-19) is in extremely poor condition due to proximity to the primary clarifiers (a corrosive environment) and is slated for demolition. MCC-19 contains several starters for the West Trickling Filter ventilation system that are still in service, as well as obsolete equipment that is no longer in service. These existing breakers and starters from MCC-5A, 5b, and 19 will be housed in a new MCC panel located adjacent to the new MSB. In addition, the existing supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) / remote telemetry unit (RTU) cabinet located inside the electrical switchgear room will be replaced with a new programmable logic controller (PLC) cabinet to serve equipment housed in both the MSB and new MCC.

The Site Waste Pump Station (SWPS) currently houses MCC-2A and 2B which were also installed in 1982 and have reached the end of its useful life. A new replacement MCC and PLC panel is included. MCC-2A and 2B provide power and control to many essential plant process areas including primary treatment, site waste pumping, and anerobic digestion. Replacement is needed for continued reliability of the WPCF operations.
 Site Waste Pump Station Operation Control House: In addition to replacing MCC-2A and 2B and the control panels from the Operation Control House, the project will also update the operation’s office and laboratory with new HVAC equipment, flooring, and restroom renovations.
 Old Cogeneration Building Improvements: In addition to replacing the MSB and MCCs, the Phase II Facilities Plan recommended retrofitting the existing Old Cogeneration Building to provide the required architectural and environmental improvements needed to house the new electrical equipment. The improvements include removing unused equipment formerly associated with the cogeneration system from the roof of the building, sealing openings in the roof and floor associated with the engines and associated piping, installing new roofing, replacing existing louvers with aluminum infill panels, adding interior and exterior finishes,

Page 5 of 12 ends

and replacing the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment. In addition, an exterior stairwell will be installed to provide safe roof access for maintaining the new HVAC equipment. These improvements will seal the building from adjacent corrosive environments and will result in an interior environment that is suitable for housing this type of critical electrical infrastructure.  Transformer: As noted above, the building is currently designed in an open louvered and ventilated structure which has resulted in extensive corrosion of the copper components within the electrical enclosure, and corrosion to an elevated copper bus duct and surrounding structure associated with transformer located outside the building. A new transformer is included to replace the existing corroded unit as well as new cable trays that will replace the existing elevated bus duct. In addition, the grating that currently covers the existing East Barminutor Structure will be replaced with a solid cover and is expected to result in a less corrosive atmosphere surrounding the new transformer.
 Panelboard Replacement: The project includes removing obsolete and unreliable control panels and equipment and installing new 480V panelboards at the South Vacuator, Air Compressor Building, and Maintenance Building. These improvements will provide safe and reliable power sources to the WPCF as well as clean up and remove outdated electrical systems.
 Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) Installation: The existing remote monitoring units (RMU), RMU-1 inside the Operations Control House, and RMU-8, inside the electrical switchgear room, will be replaced with new PLC cabinets because of their obsolescence and significant amount of field wiring in poor condition. The new PLC cabinets and all connected equipment require updated SCADA programming, which will be performed by a third-party programmer.
 Headworks Facility: The existing screenings conveyor at the Headworks Facility is currently powered by the single fed “A” side off MCC-7, which raises operational challenges when the “A” side of the MCC is shut off for maintenance work. The bar screens are fed from both the “A” and “B” side of the MCC. If the “A” side of the MCC is shut off, operations must divert the screenings from the conveyor via a discharge chute on the back side of the bar screens to portable rolling trash bins. The footprint of the Headworks building is very constricted, rendering it difficult to continually swap out the trash bins to keep the Headworks operational. The project includes an addition of a transfer switch to allow the screenings conveyor to be powered from either the “A” or “B” sides of the MCC, which will enable continuous operation of the screenings conveyor and Headworks facility.

Page 6 of 12 ends

DISCUSSION
On July 5, 20223, Council approved the plans and specifications for the project and called for bids to be received on August 16, 2022. Addendum No. 1 postponed the bid opening to August 30, 2022, due to requests from contractors citing the complexity of the project.

On August 30, 2022, three (3) bids were received, ranging from $9,936,440 to $11,452,000.

Anvil Builders, Inc. (Anvil) submitted the low bid of $9,936,440, which was 18.6% below the Engineer’s estimate of $12,200,000. Mountain Cascade submitted the second lowest bid of $10,345,136. Blocka submitted the third bid of $11,452,000, which was 6.1% below the Engineer’s estimate. The average of the three (3) bids received is $10,577,859 which is approximately 13% below the Engineer’s estimate.

The bids submitted by Anvil and Mountain Cascade were determined to be non-responsive because both contractors failed to demonstrate completion of three (3) construction contracts completed during the previous three (3) years (for the general contractor) and ten (10) years for the electrical subcontractor involving work of similar type and comparable value to the Switchgear Project. Therefore, staff recommends that the construction contract be awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, Blocka.

It is of note that despite Blocka being the third lowest bidder, their bid amount was still $748,000, or 6.1%, below the Engineer’s estimate of $12,200,000.

Staff is requesting an additional $1,717,800 (or 15% of the bid amount) be awarded for administrative change order contingency to cover unforeseen conditions and changes during construction. Given the extraordinary complexity of construction sequencing required to replace existing electrical infrastructure for plant processes that must remain online at all times except for short shutdown durations, unforeseen nature of underground work, and extensive modifications to existing electrical infrastructure, an administrative change order budget of 15% of the bid amount is requested to cover unforeseen conditions.

Therefore, the contract limit requested is $13,169,800, including administrative change orders.

BID PROTEST BY MOUNTAIN CASCADE, INC.

On September 6, 2022 as staff were in the process of reviewing the bids, Mountain Cascade submitted a bid protest letter requesting the City reject the bid submitted by Anvil on the grounds that Anvil failed to furnish with the bid project references demonstrating qualifications and experience of the electrical subcontractor (Anvil Power, Inc.). Proposal sheet P-17 of the Project Specifications requires that the electrical subcontractor have a minimum of three (3) construction contracts completed during the last ten (10) years involving work of similar type and comparable value to the Switchgear Rehabilitation Project on the bid forms. Mountain Cascade claimed:

3 https://hayward.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5714856&GUID=3E20B494-917A-4507-8AAC-C2DF43A17512&Options=&Search=

Page 7 of 12 ends

 Anvil Builders did not correctly provide the contract amount performed by the subcontractor (Anvil Power, Inc.) on the bid forms, and that they incorrectly misrepresented their projects to be of comparable value to the electrical scope of work on the project.
 Anvil Power’s project descriptions did not represent work of similar type and value to the Switchgear Rehabilitation Project.
 One of the three projects listed was not completed as certified and is therefore not a qualifying project.
 Anvil Builders is using its unqualified subcontractor without the requisite experience required by the Contract.
 Anvil Builders did not list all the subcontractors and suppliers as required on the bid form.

ANVIL BUILDERS, INC.’S RESPONSE TO THE BID PROTEST
Anvil’s response to Mountain Cascade’s claims is summarized as follows:
 For projects where Anvil Builders and Anvil Power were teamed up, they listed the contract amount (i.e., the contract amount between the general contractor and owner, and not the contract amount of the electrical subcontract portion of the work).
 For one project that was not completed yet, Anvil listed the electrical subcontract amount because the electrical portion of that project was “substantially complete.”  Where project descriptions provided are not “apparently of similar work”, Anvil states that the project descriptions were provided “exactly as originally provided in the Notice to Bidders for each individual project and provides a full picture of what each project entailed as they are both ABI and API projects.”  Anvil states that a project (WETA Ferry Terminal) listed by Mountain Cascade presents similar issues in not being a project of similar type of work or value to the Switchgear Rehabilitation Project.
 Anvil refutes the allegation that Anvil Power Inc. is not qualified and that by selfperforming the electrical work in-house is able to choose a more experienced team rather than the low bidder on bid day.
 Anvil refutes not listing all subcontractors and suppliers, as suppliers are not required to be listed unless being listed for DBE or WBE purposes.

CITY STAFF REVIEW OF ALL THREE BIDS AND RESPONSE TO THE BID PROTEST Staff reviewed the bid forms submitted by all three bidders and determined that neither Anvil Builders’ subcontractor (Anvil Power Inc.), nor Mountain Cascade’s subcontractor (Con J. Franke) electrical project references amount to three (3) projects of similar type and comparable value, and therefore are not responsive to the project’s requirements.

The project description provided in the Notice to Contractors reads: “Construction of the Switchgear Rehabilitation Project at the City of Hayward Water Pollution Control Facility.

Page 8 of 12 ends

Work involves replacement of a 480-volt electrical switchgear; replacement of several existing 480-volt motor control centers (MCCs), replacement of a 12 kV to 480-volt transformer, and other related improvements.” In addition, Section 01110 Summary of Work outlines similar project elements and includes replacement of electrical panelboards distributed around the WPCF site. Finally, Section 16100 Electrical Requirements Paragraph 1.01 C. provides an overview of the electrical work that includes the same major project elements listed above. Due to the highly specialized nature of the electrical retrofits required on this project, the electrical subcontractor is required to have a C-10 license.

Anvil’s electrical subcontractor’s (Anvil Power) references did not include any of the items noted above including installation of electrical switchgear, transformers, or MCCs. Anvil Builders states they provided work descriptions that are “exactly as originally provided in the Notice to Bidders for each individual project” rather than descriptions for work performed specifically by the electrical subcontractor, Anvil Power Inc. The “Qualifications and Experience of Electrical Subcontractor” bid form was provided for the bidder to list description of work performed to demonstrate experience and qualifications of the electrical subcontractor on projects of similar type and comparable value to the Switchgear Rehabilitation Project. Anvil had the same opportunity to expand on the features of reference projects to demonstrate their qualifications. Upon review of the information provided, staff do not find the projects listed to be similar in scope.

Anvil Builders lists the value of the electrical work performed by Anvil Power Inc., in the list of subcontractors at $1,220,000 for work described as “Electrical partial labor only.” Therefore, the City assumes that Anvil Builders Inc., plans to self-perform the bulk of the electrical work. Anvil Builders is in possession of a Class C-10 license which is required to perform the electrical work. Therefore, staff reviewed the “Qualifications and Experience of General Contractor” provided by Anvil Builders for similar project elements listed in the project description on the Notice to Contractors. Two of the projects do not describe any electrical work being performed by Anvil Builders, and the third project (UN Plaza Water Storage and Distribution) mentions “electrical and controls” and “electrical power provision” in the project description, but no other project elements are listed that demonstrate the project to be similar in scope to the Switchgear Rehabilitation Project.

Furthermore, project references are required to be provided for projects that have been completed. Substantial completion is not considered complete as portions of work can be accepted for substantial completion when turned over to an owner for beneficial use well ahead of when a project is complete. Substantial completion is not considered the same as a project being completed. Therefore, Anvil Builder’s bid was determined to be nonresponsive.

Staff also reviewed the second lowest bidder’s (Mountain Cascade) Qualifications and Experience of Electrical Subcontractor bid forms. Mountain Cascade’s electrical subcontractor, Con J. Franke, provided two project references that included similar elements (MCCs, PLC & SCADA upgrades, lighting upgrades, installation of a transformer).

One of the project references provided (Western Emergency Transportation - WETA Ferry

Page 9 of 12 ends

Terminal (Design Build)) had no similar elements to the Switchgear Rehabilitation Project.

Further, Con J. Franke did not list replacement of switchgear in any of their project references which is a key component to the Switchgear Rehabilitation Project. Finally, staff reviewed Con J. Franke’s contract amount for comparable value to the Switchgear Rehabilitation Project. Con J. Franke’s reference projects (between $2.5 million and $3.2 million) represent 55% or less of the electrical subcontract amount included on the bid form ($5.8 million), and are not considered of comparable value.

Staff also reviewed Mountain Cascades Qualifications and Experience of General Contractor bid forms and did not find the projects to be similar in scope. Therefore, Mountain Cascade’s bid was determined to be non-responsive.

Blocka’s references included installation of a 12 kv substation, MCCs, panelboards, transformers, switchgear, and a medium voltage transformer demonstrating prior experience that is consistent with the project description outlined in the Notice to Contractors. Blocka provided project references with contract amounts of $13.3, $11.6, and $8.6 million which are of comparable value to the Switchgear Rehabilitation Project electrical scope. Therefore, Blocka was determined to be a responsive bidder.

Staff reviewed Blocka’s qualifications and experience supplied in their proposal package.

Blocka has both a Class A General Engineering Contractor license and a C-10 Electrical Contractor License, and therefore submitted the same project references for both the general contractor and electrical subcontractor forms. Staff noted that Blocka inserted Sheet P-17 from Addendum 2, “Qualifications and Experience of Electrical Subcontractor” in lieu of sheet P-13, “Qualifications and Experience of Generation Contractor”. Because Blocka used the same project references for both the general and the electrical qualifications, Staff view this as a clerical error and inconsequential to the bid.

Based on the above bid review, staff recommends rejecting bids by Anvil Builders and Mountain Cascade as non-responsive, and awarding the project to Blocka Construction as the lowest responsive and responsible bidder.

If awarded, a notice to proceed will be issued following award in October 2022. Equipment procurement for the MSB, MCCs, and transformer are expected to take approximately one year. Construction is anticipated to begin in Summer 2023 and is estimated to take approximately 22 months to complete. The prolonged schedule is due to industry-wide material shortages, procurement challenges, and global supply chain issues.

ECONOMIC IMPACT
Replacing the MSB, MCCs, and related electrical equipment are part of an effort to modernize and upgrade existing facilities. The project will greatly improve reliability by reducing breakers tripping causing unplanned outages and other issues related to component failures. The community will enjoy the benefits of the Project, including

Page 10 of 12 ends

maintaining effective treatment that helps protect public health and provides environmental protection of the San Francisco Bay.

On November 15, 20164, Council passed a resolution authorizing a Community Workforce Agreement (CWA) with the Alameda County Building Trades Council (BTC), which applies to City projects with construction costs of $1,000,000 or more. The agreement requires contractors to use local union hiring halls, encourages contractors to employ Hayward residents or Hayward Unified School District graduates, and requires hired workers to pay union dues and other benefit trust fund contributions, etc. The CWA agreement applies to this Switchgear Rehabilitation Project because the construction cost is more than $1,000,000.

FISCAL IMPACT
The estimated costs for the Switchgear Rehabilitation Project are as follows:

Construction Contract $11,452,000
Administrative Construction Contingency (15%) $1,717,800 Professional Engineering Services – Consultant $1,108,835 Inspection & Testing & Permitting $80,000
Construction Administration – City Staff $200,000
Total $14,558,635
The FY 2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes the following budget for this effort:

FY23 Adopted Budget
Project
No. Description Fund 611 Fund 612 Total
07656 Switchgear
Rehabilitation $10,989,000 $900,000* $11,889,000
*Sum of FY23 Adopted Budgets for Project 07707 for “WPCF MCC 5 & 19 Replacement” and Project 07719 for “WPCF Old Cogen Building Repurpose,” which are both part of the larger Switchgear Rehabilitation Project and have as such been combined into Project 07656 for Switchgear Rehabilitation (formerly called “WPCF Main 480V MCC Electrical Distribution Rehabilitation”).

4 https://hayward.legistar.com/MeetingDetail.aspx?ID=504356&GUID=BBB3510A-72A9-4C24-ADA5- 97D40B48097B&Options=info|&Search=

Page 11 of 12 ends

Appropriation of Additional Funds
The adopted FY 2023 CIP includes a total of $11,889,000 for the Switchgear Rehabilitation effort, across both the Sewer System Capital Replacement Fund (Fund 611) and the Sewer System Capital Improvement Fund ( Fund 612). In 2021, the City entered into a PSA with Carollo Engineers, Inc., (Carollo), of which $1,108,835 is for design services and technical support during construction. As of September 2022, $10,780,165 of the CIP funds remains available for construction, inspection, and administration.

The total estimated cost of $14,558,635 to implement the project exceeds the $11,889,000 included in the FY 2023 Adopted CIP. The original estimate was based on preliminary conceptual design. These costs are typically developed when project definition is at the planning stage. Expected accuracy for a planning stage estimate typically ranges as much as 25% below or above the actual cost. In addition, due to the recent COVID-19 pandemicrelated global supply chain disruption and its impact on costs, the current estimated project cost at $14,558,635 is approximately 22% higher than the original FY 2023 CIP budgeted amount of $11,889,000.

Furthermore, staff discussed appropriating additional funds during the July 5, 2022 Council meeting when requesting approval of the project plans and specifications and call for bids.

Another unknown for projects of this size and complexity is the additional cost for compliance with the CWA which adds additional overhead costs since the Contractor must account for when they are required to hire workers outside their core employees.

Therefore, staff recommends that Council authorize the City Manager to appropriate additional funds in the amount of $2,669,635 from the Sewer System Replacement Fund (Fund 611) to fully fund the project in FY 2023. Sufficient fund balance is available to cover the necessary appropriation. There will be no impact to the General Fund.

STRATEGIC ROADMAP
This agenda item supports the Strategic Roadmap to Invest in Infrastructure. Specifically, this item supports the following:

Project N19 Design Water Pollution Control Facility Phase II Upgrade

SUSTAINABILITY FEATURES
This project will help the City maintain its ability to treat wastewater efficiently and adequately for reuse or before discharging into San Francisco Bay.

Page 12 of 12 ends

PUBLIC CONTACT
All project work will be within the WPCF plant boundary and should have no impact on area businesses or the public at large; therefore, no public contact is necessary for this project.

NEXT STEPS
The following schedule has been developed for this project:

Award Construction Contract October 11, 2022
Notice to Proceed October 28, 2022
Construction Completion May 2025
Due to anticipated delays in equipment procurement and global supply chain issues, the project is anticipated to be completed in May 2025 which is a longer timeline than in normal years. Staff aims to issue the notice to proceed in October 2022 to begin the material procurement phase and accommodate for the long lead times to manufacture the electrical equipment. It is anticipated that construction will begin in Summer 2023 upon material procurement. Scheduling changes may occur as a result of supply chain volatility and material availability.

In addition, staff will advertise a request for proposals for a PSA for third party programming services for SCADA /PLC programming and systems integration required for the new electrical equipment. Staff will return to Council for the award of the professional services for third party programming services.

Prepared by: Mariza Sibal, Associate Civil Engineer
Reviewed by: Suzan England, Senior Utilities Engineer
Recommended by: Alex Ameri, Director of Public Works
Approved by:

________________________________
Kelly McAdoo, City Manager

ATTACHMENT II

Page 1 of 3 ends

HAYWARD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 22-____
Introduced by Council Member __________
RESOLUTION APPROVING ADDENDUMS NO. 1, NO. 2, AND NO.3, ACCEPTING

THE BID PROTEST, AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO BLOCKA
CONSTRUCTION, INC., FOR THE WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITY’S SWITCHGEAR REHABILITATION PROJECT, PROJECT NO. 07656, IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $13,169,800, AND APPROPRIATING ADDITIONAL FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,669,635
WHEREAS, the City of Hayward (City) owns and operates the Water Pollution Control Facility (WPCF), which treats an average flow of approximately eleven million gallons per day; and
WHEREAS, the existing main switchgear (MSB), originally installed in 1982, is a key component of the power distribution system at the WPCF. The MSB along with several related motor control centers (MCCs) and distribution panelboards (PBs) have provided power and controls to various plant processes for nearly forty years and have exceeded their useful lives; and
WHEREAS, On February 27, 2018, the City entered into an agreement with Black & Veatch Corporation to perform engineering services for the WPCF Phase II Facilities Plan.

The Phase II Facilities Plan serves as a comprehensive planning document for the WPCF infrastructure needs for the next twenty-five years; and WHEREAS, the WPCF Phase II Facilities Plan evaluated the WPCF’s electrical system and recommended replacing the MSB, MCCs, PBs, and retrofitting the existing old cogeneration building which houses this electrical equipment; and WHEREAS, on May 2021, the City entered into an agreement with Carollo Engineers to perform final designs services for the WPCF Switchgear Rehabilitation Project.

WHEREAS, by Resolution 22-194, on July 5, 2022, the City Council approved the plans and specifications for the Switchgear Rehabilitation Project, Project No. 07656, and called for bids to be received by August 16, 2022; and
WHEREAS, Addendums No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3, were issued to make minor revisions to the plans and specifications and postpone the bid opening date to August 30, 2022; and

ATTACHMENT II

Page 2 of 3 ends

WHEREAS, on August 30, 2022, three (3) bids were received ranging from $9,936,440 to $11,452,000. The low bid, submitted by Anvil Builders, Inc. (Anvil) is approximately 18.6% below the engineer’s estimate of $12,200,000; and WHEREAS, on September 6, 2022, the City received a bid protest letter from Mountain Cascade, Inc. (Mountain Cascade), requesting that the City reject the bid submitted by Anvil on the grounds that they were not a responsive bidder; and WHEREAS, on September 8, 2022, the City received a response to the bid protest letter from Anvil; and
WHEREAS, the City reviewed the bid forms submitted by all three bidders and determined that both Anvil and Mountain Cascade were non-responsive bidders on the basis of not providing a minimum of (3) construction contracts completed in the last ten (10) years involving work of similar type and comparable value to the Switchgear Rehabilitation Project ; and
WHEREAS, the third lowest bidder, Blocka Construction, Inc. (Blocka), was determined to be a responsive and responsible bidder having provided with their bid qualifying project references of similar type and comparable value; and WHEREAS, Blocka is the lowest responsive and responsible bidder with a bid of $11,452,000, which is approximately 6.1% below the Engineer’s estimate of $12,200,000; and
WHEREAS, the project is of extraordinary complexity involving replacing electrical equipment within an operational wastewater treatment facility, an administrative change order contingency of $1,717,800 (or 15% of the bid amount) is requested bringing the contract limit to be awarded to $13,169,800 including administrative change orders.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hayward that Addendums No.1, No. 2, and No.3, are hereby approved and adopted as part of the plans and specifications for the project.

BE IT RESOLVED that the bid protest letter from Mountain Cascade is hereby accepted, and bids from both Anvil Builders and Mountain Cascade are determined nonresponsive and hereby rejected.

BE IT FURTHER REOLVED that Blocka Construction, Inc. of Pleasanton, CA, is hereby awarded the contract for the Switchgear Rehabilitation Project, Project No. 07656, in accordance with the plans and specifications adopted therefore and on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Hayward, at and for the price named and stated in the final proposal of the hereinabove specified bidder, and all other bids are hereby rejected.

ATTACHMENT II

Page 3 of 3 ends

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute an agreement with Blocka Construction, Inc. on behalf of the City of Hayward, in an amount not-to-exceed $13,169,800 (including administrative change orders), in a form to be approved by the City Attorney.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hayward hereby amends the FY 2023 CIP Budget by approving the additional appropriation of fund the amount of $2,669,635, from the Capital Improvement Project – Sewer Replacement Fund, increasing the budgeted amount for the Switchgear Rehabilitation Project, Project No. 07656, from $11,889,000 to $14,558,635.

IN COUNCIL, HAYWARD, CALIFORNIA _______________________, 2022 ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MAYOR:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: _______________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Hayward
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________________
City Attorney of the City of Hayward
CITY OF HAYWARD Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
File #: CONS 22-526
DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Chief of Police

SUBJECT
Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Accept and Appropriate $55,000 in Grant Funding From the University of California Davis Koret Shelter Medicine Program’s “California for All Animals” Grant to the Hayward Police Department’s Animal Services Bureau

RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopts a resolution (Attachment II) authorizing the City Manager to accept and appropriate $55,000 in grant funding from the University of California-Davis (UCD) Koret Shelter Medicine Program’s “California for All Animals” grant, to be used by the Hayward Police Department’s Animal Services Bureau.

SUMMARY
The Hayward Police Department’s Animal Services Bureau (ASB) applied for and was awarded $55,000 in grant funding from the UCD Campus School of Veterinary Medicine’s Koret Shelter Medicine Program as part of their California for All Animals Spring 2022 Grant. The funds will be used for the ASB’s Trap, Neuter, and Return (TNR) program. Through TNR, feral (unsocialized) community cats are humanely trapped, spayed or neutered, vaccinated, microchipped, and/or ear-tipped, and then returned to their outdoor homes. Through this grant, free TNR services will be offered to community members in project neighborhoods and low-income community cat caregivers to provide TNR services to 400-500 feral community cats. The trapping, neutering, and returning of feral community cats keep these cats out of the shelter where they would be euthanized. It also immediately stops the cats’ ability to reproduce, stabilizing cat colonies and reducing populations over time.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 1 of 1 Printed on 10/6/2022
powered by Legistar™

Page 1 of 3 ends

DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Accept and Appropriate $55,000 in Grant Funding From the University of California Davis Koret Shelter Medicine Program’s “California for All Animals” Grant to the Hayward Police Department’s Animal Services Bureau

RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopts a resolution (Attachment II) authorizing the City Manager to accept and appropriate $55,000 in grant funding from the University of California Davis (UCD) Koret Shelter Medicine Program’s “California for All Animals” grant, to be used by the Hayward Police Department’s Animal Services Bureau.

The funds will be used for ASB’s Trap, Neuter, and Return (TNR) program. Through TNR, feral (unsocialized) community cats are humanely trapped, spayed or neutered, vaccinated, microchipped, and/or ear-tipped, and then returned to their outdoor homes. Through this grant, free TNR services will be offered to community members in project neighborhoods and low-income community cat caregivers to provide TNR services to 400-500 feral community cats. The trapping, neutering, and returning of feral community cats keep these cats out of the shelter where they would be euthanized. It also immediately stops the cats’ ability to reproduce, stabilizing cat colonies and reducing populations over time.

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
The ASB applied for and was awarded $55,000 in grant funding from the UCD School of Medicine’s Koret Shelter Medicine Program as part of their “California for All Animals” Spring 2022 Grant. The goal of the California for All Animals program is to reduce the number of healthy and treatable cats which are otherwise humanely euthanized at shelters. The grant funding focuses on four categories. ASB applied for funding under the category of “Intake

Page 2 of 3 ends

Management and Community Support,” which focuses on strengthening and streamlining our organization’s ability to provide services to the community, including keeping animals in their homes and communities of origin.

The overpopulation of cats is not unique to Hayward. TNR techniques have been found to be the most humane and effective approach for handling community cat overpopulation.

Scientific studies show that TNR stops the cycle of new litters of kittens and stabilizes the population of community cats, reducing the population over time. Community cats are cats that live in the community and may or may not have an identified caregiver. Community cats can be feral (unsocialized) or friendly domesticated. Feral community cats are not able to be handled and are normally euthanized when turned into a shelter. The ASB hopes that funding from this grant and the introduction of the TNR program will help reduce the number of feral community cats which are ultimately euthanized at shelters.

The ASB already coordinates a feral community cat TNR program, and plans to use these grant funds to reduce the number of homeless kittens born in the community and prevent feral community cat euthanasia through its TNR program. Strategies include the following:
a. Coordinate TNR of 900 feral community cats during the term of the grant with 400- 500 of those cats would be grant funded. The remaining 400 will be funded by community cat caregivers and donations received by the ASB specifically for TNR. b. Conduct community meetings to discuss community cats and educate about TNR. c. Incentivize community members to get involved in TNR of feral community cats in their neighborhoods by offering free TNR of up to 10 feral community cats. d. Offer five free TNR appointments to low-income feral community cat caregivers. e. Fund TNR of cats trapped by volunteer trappers in identified areas where there is no known feral cat caregiver.

FISCAL IMPACT
Acceptance of the “California for All Animals” grant and appropriation of $55,000 to the General Fund will help continue funding of the ASB’s TNR program and increase its capabilities.

STRATEGIC ROADMAP
The “California for All Animals” grant supports the Enhance Community Safety & Quality of Life priority outlined in the Council’s Strategic Roadmap, although it does not fit into a specific project.

NEXT STEPS
If Council adopts the attached resolution, staff will appropriate the funding into the Police Department’s budget and administer the grant per the terms and conditions of the University of California and Koret Shelter Medicine Program’s “California for All Animals” grant agreement.

Page 3 of 3 ends

Prepared by: Jennie Comstock, Animal Services Administrator Recommended by: Toney Chaplin, Chief of Police
Approved by:
_________________________________
Kelly McAdoo, City Manager

ATTACHMENT II

Page 1 of 2 ends

HAYWARD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 22-_________
Introduced by Council Member ______________

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ACCEPT AND
APPROPRIATE $55,000 IN GRANT FUNDING FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS KORET SHELTER MEDICINE PROGRAM’S “CALIFORNIA FOR ALL ANIMALS” GRANT TO THE HAYWARD ANIMAL SERVICES BUREAU WHEREAS, the “California for All Animals” grant, administered through the University of California Davis (UCD) Koret Shelter Medicine Program, made grant funds available for programs to use to reduce the euthanasia of healthy and treatable animals in shelters; and WHEREAS, the UCD Koret Shelter Medicine Program has awarded the Hayward Police Department’s Animal Services Bureau grant funding in the category of “Intake Management and Community Support,” which includes keeping animals in their homes and communities of origin; and
WHEREAS, the UCD Koret Shelter Medicine Program has awarded the Hayward Police Department’s Animal Services Bureau $55,000 to support Trap, Neuter and Return (TNR) activities that will help to reduce the number of cats born on the streets, stabilizing and eventually reducing cat populations, keeping feral community cats out of the shelter where they would be euthanized; and
WHEREAS, the Hayward Animal Services Bureau plans to use the funds from the “California for All Animals” grant, to make TNR services available to identified project neighborhoods and low-income feral community cat caregivers, for free.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hayward that the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to accept and appropriate $55,000 of the “California for All Animals” grant funds from the UCD School of Medicine’s Koret Shelter Medicine Program to the General Fund for use by the Hayward Police Department’s Animal Services Bureau.

ATTACHMENT II

Page 2 of 2 ends

IN COUNCIL, HAYWARD, CALIFORNIA _______________________, 2022 ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MAYOR:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: ______________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Hayward
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________________
City Attorney of the City of Hayward

CITY OF HAYWARD Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
File #: CONS 22-555
DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Assistant City Manager

SUBJECT
Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Accept and Appropriate $125,000 in Grant Funding from the Stupski Foundation for the Hayward Food, Agriculture, and Economy Plan

RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopts the attached resolution (Attachment II) authorizing the City Manager to accept and appropriate $125,000 to Fund 240 in grant funding from the Stupski Foundation for the Hayward Food, Agriculture, and Economy Plan.

SUMMARY
On October 19, 2021, Council adopted a resolution to join Alameda County’s ALL IN Eats partnership. As part of this work, staff applied for and received a $125,000 planning grant from the Stupski Foundation to build capacity alongside key community partners and develop a Food, Agriculture, and Economy Action Plan. Staff is seeking Council authorization to accept this grant funding.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 1 of 1 Printed on 10/6/2022
powered by Legistar™

Page 1 of 3 ends

DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Accept and Appropriate $125,000 in Grant Funding from the Stupski Foundation for the Hayward Food, Agriculture, and Economy Plan

RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopts a resolution (Attachment II) authorizing the City Manager to accept and appropriate $125,000 to Fund 240 in grant funding from the Stupski Foundation for the Hayward Food, Agriculture, and Economy Plan.

BACKGROUND
At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the City partnered with several organizations to tackle the significant demand for food in Hayward. The City partnered with Chabot Community College to launch and staff a food distribution site that distributed over 1,701,432 pounds of food to 179,700 people. Throughout these efforts, community and educational partners expressed the need for a more coherent community-led plan around food access and the need for capacity building. Despite this desire for collective planning, Hayward does not have an obvious community-based organization with the capacity or mission to lead this effort.

On October 19, 2021, Council adopted a resolution to join Alameda County’s ALL IN Eats partnership.1 The purpose of ALL IN is to provide leadership, innovation, and

1 https://hayward.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5186198&GUID=318B200C-6640-4768-AAA8- 8A21AA4C0503&Options=&Search=

Page 2 of 3 ends

collaboration across public, private, and community sectors to address the root causes of poverty. Since joining, staff from the City Manager’s Office has been attending the monthly steering committee and working group meetings.

At the January 29, 2022 Strategic Roadmap Planning session, Council ranked their top priority projects, and ranked the project to “exploring funding opportunities to increase the circular food economy in Hayward” as one of the highest priority items.2 As a response to Council’s interests and feedback from community partners, staff sought funding to organize a collective effort and engage partners to create a Food, Agriculture, and Economy Plan for Hayward. Staff applied for and received a $125,000 grant from the Stupski Foundation. There is no match requirement for the funding and no strict requirement for when this funding should be spent.

DISCUSSION
Staff proposes using the grant funds to engage partners and residents to identify immediate and long-term priorities through community-led interviews and surveying, paid internships to support evidence gathering and planning efforts, and site visits to successful circular food economy examples.

Work group meetings with partners would be based on the three topics: Food Access & Security, Career Pathways & Entrepreneurship, and Culture & Heritage. These meeting would begin in October and run through the beginning of 2023. The committee and work groups would identify key priorities by the end of May 2022 to be shared with future funders.

Action Plan Partners - Throughout the month of August, staff met with over 20 organizations and service providers to gauge the need and interest to participate in a Food Action Plan for Hayward.

Partners that have expressed interest in this effort include: Cal State East Bay, Chabot College, Deputy Sheriffs' Activities League (Dig Deep Farms), Downtown Streets Team, Eden Area Food Alliance, Eden ROP, Eden United Church of Christ, First Pres/South Hayward Parish, ForestR.org, Glad Tidings, Hayward Area Recreation and Park District, Hayward Community Gardeners, Hayward Library Staff, Hayward Environmental Services staff, Hayward Promise Neighborhoods (HPN), Hayward Unified School District/Tennyson High School, Humanity for 100K Trees, StopWaste, Tiburcio Vasquez Health Center, UC Agriculture Extension and Nutrition staff.

Alameda County Community Food Bank and Berkley Food Network are additional organizations that staff has met with that have expressed tentative interest in providing technical assistance.

2 https://hayward.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5565349&GUID=459912E5-E1C0-4580-BE80- 3DFEFBC33C72&Options=&Search=

Page 3 of 3 ends

FISCAL IMPACT
The funding for this grant is solely for the purpose of planning and capacity building. It is a one-time grant with no match requirement and will have no impact on the City’s funds.

STRATEGIC ROADMAP
This agenda item is a project in the City’s Strategic Roadmap. It is related to the following project:
 Confront Climate Crisis & Champion Environmental Justice: Explore funding opportunities to increase the circular food economy in Hayward as part of the Alameda County All in Eats Initiative

NEXT STEPS
If Council approves the resolution, staff will use the funding to continue work on the Food, Economy, and Agriculture Action Plan. Staff will return to Council for a work session on October 25, 2022 to present preliminary data on food access and career pathways in Hayward and seek Council feedback on the scope of the Action Plan.

Prepared by: Emily Hwang, Management Fellow
Mary Thomas, Management Analyst
Recommended by: Jennifer Ott, Assistant City Manager
Approved by:
_________________________________
Kelly McAdoo, City Manager

ATTACHMENT II

Page 1 of 2 ends

HAYWARD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 22-____
Introduced by Council Member __________

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ACCEPT AND
APPROPRIATE $125,000 TO FUND 240 IN GRANT FUNDING FROM

THE STUPSKI FOUNDATION FOR THE HAYWARD FOOD,

AGRICULTURE, AND ECONOMY PLAN
WHEREAS, in the last year, the City joined Alameda County’s All in Eats Initiative and listed exploring funding opportunities to increase the circular food economy in Hayward as a project in the City of Hayward’s Strategic Roadmap; and WHEREAS, the Stupski Foundation has awarded the City a $125,000 grant to pay for elements of the Hayward Food, Agriculture, and Economy Plan which will convene local partners and define key priorities for Hayward’s food availability and access, career pathways, entrepreneurship support, and culture and wellness.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hayward authorizes the City Manager to accept and appropriate $125,000 to Fund 240 in grant funding from the Stupski Foundation for the Hayward Food, Agriculture, and Economy Plan.

ATTACHMENT II

Page 2 of 2 ends

IN COUNCIL, HAYWARD, CALIFORNIA _______________________, 2022 ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MAYOR:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: ______________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Hayward
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________________
City Attorney of the City of Hayward
CITY OF HAYWARD Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
File #: CONS 22-557
DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Fire Chief

SUBJECT
Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Accept and Appropriate $29,000 in Grant Funding from the Alameda County Office of Emergency Services for the Installation of a Transfer Switch for the Hayward Communication Center

RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopts the attached resolution (Attachment II) authorizing the City Manager to accept and appropriate $29,000 in grant funding from the Alameda County Office of Emergency Services for the installation of a transfer switch at the Hayward Communication Center.

SUMMARY
The Alameda County Office of Emergency Services (OES) received a Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) grant to provide local jurisdictions funding to install equipment in essential facilities throughout the County that do not have existing backup power connections. On May 11, 2022, Hayward Fire Department was awarded $29,000 (Attachment III) to install a transfer switch in the Hayward Communications Center to ensure continuity of dispatch operations following a loss of power.

Staff is requesting that Council approve the attached resolution to accept and appropriate the OES award for the Hayward Communication Center’s transfer switch installation.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
Attachment III Award Letter
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 1 of 1 Printed on 10/6/2022
powered by Legistar™

Page 1 of 3 ends

DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Fire Chief
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Accept and Appropriate $29,000 in Grant Funding from the Alameda County Office of Emergency Services for the Installation of a Transfer Switch for the Hayward Communication Center

Staff is requesting that Council approve the attached resolution to accept and appropriate the OES award for the Hayward Communication Center’s transfer switch installation.

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
OES was awarded a grant from PG&E to provide funding for generators and related hardware installation to power essential facilities throughout the County that do not have existing backup power supplies in place. Hayward Fire Department requested funding to purchase necessary equipment, materials and labor to connect an auxiliary generator (also referred to as a “transfer switch”)to the Hayward Communications Center’s electrical system.

In order to decide how to use the $29,000 of grant funding, City staff were invited to submit proposed locations within the City that they deemed “essential facilities,” (due to the facilities’ function in providing emergency services or care and/or shelter the public), which staff

Page 2 of 3 ends

believed would be impacted during widespread and extended power outages. Staff formed a committee that included representatives from various City departments and OES. This committee explored the Matt Jimenez Community Center, the community center in Weekes Park, the police headquarters/Hayward Communication Center, and buildings at Chabot College. The committee ultimately agreed that the Hayward Communication Center location (at Hayward police headquarters) which facilitates emergency dispatch and houses the critically important, computer server room, was the “essential facility” that should benefit from the grant. Should the current backup generator at the Hayward Communications Center fail or need servicing during an extended power outage, the 911 dispatch and communications systems would be disrupted, which could be detrimental to Hayward citizens.

The addition of the transfer switch at the Hayward Communications Center will allow for a large portable generator to be safely connected to the building. This will ensure that all electrical circuits that the current, hardwired emergency generator serves will have power in the event it is needed. The transfer switch provides the City’s emergency communications center and police department with a redundant power source critical to life safety during a long-term power outage.

STRATEGIC ROADMAP
This agenda item supports the Strategic Priority of Enhance Community Safety and Quality of Life. Specifically, this item relates to the development and implementation of the following projects:

Project Q9 Support Safety through Emergency Preparedness, Planning, and Response

FISCAL IMPACT
This funding source does not require a match and will have no impact on the City’s General Fund. These grant funds will allow the Fire Department to procure supplies and services it would not be able to under this year’s operating budget.

NEXT STEPS
If this item is approved, staff will purchase the necessary equipment and install the transfer switch at Hayward Police Department Headquarters to support dispatch operations.

Page 3 of 3 ends

Prepared by: Shanalee Gallagher, Management Analyst
Paul Wheeler, Emergency Services Officer
Recommended by: Garrett Contreras, Fire Chief
Approved by:
__________________________________
Kelly McAdoo, City Manager

ATTACHMENT II

Page 1 of 2 ends

HAYWARD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 22 -____
Introduced by Council Member __________

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ACCEPT AND
APPROPRIATE $29,000 IN GRANT FUNDING FROM ALAMEDA COUNTY

OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A

TRANSFER SWITCH AT THE HAYWARD COMMUNICATION CENTER
WHEREAS, the Alameda County Office of Emergency Services was awarded a grant from Pacific Gas & Electric to provide funding for generators and related hardware installation to power essential facilities throughout the county that do not have existing backup power supplies in place; and
WHEREAS, City staff, including members of the Hayward Fire Department and other City departments in collaboration with the Alameda County Office of Emergency Services, identified the Hayward Communications Center (9-1-1 Dispatch Center) as an essential facility in need of alternative power source(s) for the continuity of operations during a sustained power outage; and
WHEREAS, on May 11, 2022, the City of Hayward was informed that it was awarded $29,000 in grant funding to install a generator transfer switch at the Hayward Communications Center to support dispatch operations through a power outage.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hayward authorizes the City Manager to accept and appropriate $29,000 in grant funding for the work and materials associated with the installation of a generator transfer switch.

ATTACHMENT II

Page 2 of 2 ends

IN COUNCIL, HAYWARD, CALIFORNIA _______________________, 2022.

ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MAYOR:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: ______________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Hayward
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________________
City Attorney of the City of Hayward

ATTACHMENT III

CITY OF HAYWARD Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
File #: CONS 22-562
DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Assistant City Manager

SUBJECT
Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute a Lease Agreement with Forestr.org for the Hazel Community Garden through December 31, 2023, with an Option for a Two-Year Extension

RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopts a resolution (Attachment II) authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute a lease agreement with Forestr.org for the Hazel Community Garden through December 31, 2023, with an option for a two-year extension.

SUMMARY
Community members in the Prospect Hill neighborhood have maintained a public garden on 22196 Main Street for decades, referred to as the Hazel Community Garden. This City is the owner of this parcel. Staff recently became aware that there is no written lease agreement for the garden. Staff has worked with the community members since June 2022 to identify a non-profit sponsor for the garden and to draft lease terms. In August, the community group partnered with Forestr.org, which has agreed to sponsor oversight of the garden operations. The attached resolution seeks Council authorization for the City Manager to execute a lease agreement with Forestr.org through December 2023 with an option for a twoyear extension.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 1 of 1 Printed on 10/6/2022
powered by Legistar™

Page 1 of 4 ends

DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute a Lease Agreement with Forestr.org for the Hazel Community Garden through December 31, 2023, with an Option for a Two-Year Extension

SUMMARY
Community members in the Prospect Hill neighborhood have maintained a public garden on 22196 Main Street for decades, referred to as the Hazel Community Garden. This City is the owner of this parcel. Staff recently became aware that there is no written lease agreement for the garden. Staff has worked with the community members since June 2022 to identify a nonprofit sponsor for the garden and to draft lease terms. In August, the community group partnered with Forestr.org, which has agreed to sponsor oversight of the garden operations.

The attached resolution seeks Council authorization for the City Manager to execute a lease agreement with Forestr.org through December 2023 with an option for a two-year extension.

BACKGROUND
For several decades, community members in the Prospect Hill neighborhood have maintained a public garden on 22196 Main Street. This is referred to as the Hazel Community Garden, as it is close to Hazel Ave. The garden is across the San Lorenzo Creek from the Lincoln Landing project (see below for aerial and street views). The City is the owner of the parcel.

On May 18, 2021, Council approved funding the Hayward People’s Budget, a $350,000 participatory budgeting project to fund twelve neighborhood projects throughout Hayward.

Through the People’s Budget, the community members from the Hazel Garden submitted a project proposal for improvements to the garden and received funding through the community vote.

Page 2 of 4 ends

DISCUSSION
During the People’s Budget funding process, staff became aware that there is currently no written lease agreement for the garden parcel. Staff has worked with the community members since June 2022 to identify a non-profit sponsor for the garden and to draft lease terms. In August, the community group partnered with Forestr.org, which has agreed to sponsor the garden. Forestr.org is a recently founded, Castro-Valley-based nonprofit whose mission is to “educate local communities about permaculture practices, plan local lands with the forests of the future, and employ local visionaries in green jobs for all ages.” Aerial View
Street View

Page 3 of 4 ends

Lease Terms: The lease agreement will be through December 31, 2023 with an option for a two-year extension. The garden will be open to the public during this term for the benefit of the neighborhood.
 Upfront Improvements: During the first months of this lease, the City will remove dying trees to create an access easement, which will make it easier to clear the brush along the San Lorenzo creek. The City will also build a fence along the north side of the property to provide privacy to the neighboring home. Forstr.org will be responsible for any maintenance costs associated with these improvements.  Care of Premises: Forstr.org, in partnership with the neighborhood group, will be responsible for all ongoing maintenance of the property. Once a year, the City will provide brush cleaning services along San Lorenzo creek.  Utilities: The City will pay for water and garbage and will provide a dumpster for lager cleanup events up to two times per year. Forstr.org will be responsible for keeping the trash carts secure and bringing them to the curb for weekly pickup.  Insurance: Forst.org will maintain insurance per the City’s requirements.

Surplus Land Act: This lease is exempt from the requirements of the Surplus Land Act. The Act does not apply to leases with terms that are less than five years, including extensions or options. (SLA Guidelines section 102(h)(1)).

CEQA Compliance: This lease is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15304 of the CEQA Guidelines relating to minor alterations to land and 15301 relating to operation and leasing of existing public facilities involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use.

STRATEGIC ROADMAP
This agenda item supports the Strategic Priority of Support Quality of Life. Specifically, this item relates to the implementation of the following project:

Project Q5j: Implement Neighborhood Participatory Budgeting

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact resulting from this lease agreement. As part of the lease, the City will be contributing some upfront improvements. The costs associated with these improvements will be absorbed into the existing operating budget.

Page 4 of 4 ends

Prepared by: Mary Thomas, Management Analyst
Emily Hwang, Management Fellow
Recommended by: Jennifer Ott, Assistant City Manager
Approved by:
_________________________________
Kelly McAdoo, City Manager

ATTACHMENT II

Page 1 of 2 ends

HAYWARD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 22-____
Introduced by Council Member __________

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTATE
AND EXECUTE A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH FORESTR.ORG FOR THE
HAZEL COMMUNITY GARDEN THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2023, WITH

AN OPTION FOR A TWO-YEAR EXTENSION
WHEREAS, Hayward community members in the Prospect Hill neighborhood have maintained a public garden on the parcel at 22196 Main Street for many years, referred to as the Hazel Community Garden; and
WHEREAS, the City and Forstr.org have the mutual goal of sustaining the Hazel Garden for the benefit of the surrounding neighborhoods.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hayward that the City Manager is authorized and directed to negotiate and execute a lease agreement for a community garden with Forestr.org for 22196 Main Street through December 31, 2023, with an option for a two-year extension.

ATTACHMENT II

Page 2 of 2 ends

IN COUNCIL, HAYWARD, CALIFORNIA _______________________, 2022 ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MAYOR:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: ______________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Hayward
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________________
City Attorney of the City of Hayward
CITY OF HAYWARD Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
File #: WS 22-032
DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director

SUBJECT
Report on Activities from Downtown Hayward Improvement Association District Manager (Oral Report Only)

RECOMMENDATION
That the Council receive a presentation from the Downtown Hayward Improvement Association (DHIA) District Manager, Dominic LiMandri, who will provide an update on the DHIA activities over the last couple of years, and discuss plans for the upcoming year.

SUMMARY
For several years, the City worked to establish a Community Benefit District (CBD) in Downtown Hayward. On July 10, 2018, Council adopted Resolution 18-151, establishing the Downtown Hayward CBD. The District, known as the Downtown Hayward Improvement Association (DHIA), was formed and meets regularly to carry out the functions outlined in the District Management Plan. Since formation, the DHIA has been focused on allocating the DHIA budget and making decisions, based on committee recommendations, on how to prioritize those funds and support activities to enhance downtown Hayward. DHIA staff operated throughout the pandemic providing services, including sidewalk washing, trash pick-up and coordination with City staff to support business through the outdoor dining program.

In addition, the DHIA has explored opportunities to enhance safety in downtown, including installation of cameras, additional lighting and deployment of private security. Lastly, the DHIA has partnered with a public relations firm to help promote businesses and special event activities in downtown, as well as enhance the core of downtown with additional hanging flower baskets and updated banners.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I Presentation
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 1 of 1 Printed on 10/6/2022
powered by Legistar™
FY21-22 Annual Report to City Council
Downtown Hayward Improvement Association
Presented by Dominic Li Mandri
District Manager | New City America, Inc.

History
➢ Interim Board
established September
2018; formed for 10-year
term; ends in 2028
➢ Sept. 2018 – Jan. 2019:

Corporation Formed,
Bylaws Adopted, Bank
Selected and Insurance
Acquired
➢ March 2019: DHIA Logo
Selected
➢ July 2019: Maintenance
Operations Commenced
Overview
➢ 9 Member Board of Directors
➢ Annual Budget: Approx. $595,000
➢ 239 Parcels/150 Property Owners
➢ Provides services to downtown property
owners above and beyond what the City of
Hayward provides; the DHIA does not clean
municipal/private parking lots
➢ Majority of district business is conducted
through three Advisory Committees
Three Advisory Committees
➢ Sidewalk Operations, Beautification & Order (SOBO) Committee:
• Oversees the District’s Clean & Safe operations and enhanced landscaping program ➢ District Identity & Streetscape Improvement (DISI) Committee:
• Oversees the District’s marketing and media promotion, as well as its local placemaking projects and special events
➢ Land Use & Project Review Committee:
• Reviews the District’s land use and mobility issues, in addition to reviewing new development projects and capital improvement projects in downtown Sidewalk Operations,
Beautification &
Order (SOBO)
Highlights
➢ Provided seven days-a-week
maintenance coverage of the
downtown area for the year
➢ Deployed two separate private
security firms as a pilot to
conduct local patrols in downtown
in June and Nov. 2021.
➢ Installed 25 new hanging flower
baskets on B Street in August
2021;
➢ Provided regular steam cleaning
services districtwide year-round
➢ Rolled out camera pilot project to
install 5 ALPR cameras at key
intersections in downtown

DHIA IN-HOUSE

MAINTENANCE
STATISTICS 2021-22
➢ Approx lbs. of Trash Removed . . . . . . . .
40,000 lbs.
➢ Approx lbs. of Leaves Removed . . . . . . .
13,125 lbs.
➢ Graffiti Removed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 430+
➢ Incidents of Debris Removed . . . . 740+
➢ # of times the district steam cleaned: 10
➢ 32 Planted Barrels Installed / 25
Flower Baskets Hung
➢ 2 Security Guard Patrol Firms
Engaged: Length of Patrol Service: 5
months → $86,000 expended
2022 DHIA Maintenance Ops Transition
➢ After managing maintenance operations inhouse for the last 3 years, in April 2022, the Board elected to transfer district
maintenance operations to a third-party
vendor: NexStreet.
➢ Since May 1st, 2022, NexStreet has provided
all district maintenance services for the
DHIA.
➢ NexStreet also tracks all completed
maintenance tasks in-district via an app
(JIA) which illustrates where the
maintenance concerns occur in downtown.

Ex. of monthly maintenance reports
District Identity &
Streetscape Improvement
(DISI) Highlights
➢ In 2021, partnered with the City to
launch the Together for Hayward street
party and assisted in the year-long street
closures on Main Street.
➢ In 2021, the DHIA contracted with
Chamber of Commerce to provide Social
Media services to district; in 2022, the
DHIA has contracted with Olive Creative
Strategies to promote the downtown.
➢ Since May 2022, DHIA has gained
3,700+ SM followers from scratch
➢ Supported local events to bring families
back to downtown → May Day, Street
Parties, Mariachi Festival, more in 2023.
➢ Designed new “Welcome Home” banners
for installation on B Street; new
historical banners on the way!
Downtown PR/SM Services
DHIA Supported Events/Programs in Downtown
Land Use & Project
Review Highlights
➢ Worked closely with City
staff to review and provide
feedback to the Main Street
Complete Street capital
improvement project.
➢ Advocated for traffic calming
measures specifically on
Main Street crosswalks
➢ Reviewed Main/Maple
Project development and
drafted letter of support
➢ Coordinated with the City
on several code enforcement
concerns in downtown
Highlights in 2021 - 2022
Potential Projects in 2022-23
End of Year Transition
➢ At the October 5, 2022, Annual Board Meeting, New City America announced it’s plans to transition out of management of the DHIA by the end of this fiscal year (December 31st, 2022).
➢ New City America is a San Diego-based business, and after four (4) years of management of all aspects of the DHIA, we feel it would be best if the Board had an opportunity to explore more local management options. ➢ NCA has been authorized by the Board to issue an RFP for management of the DHIA, and anticipates releasing said RFP within the next two weeks.

Thank you!
CITY OF HAYWARD Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
File #: PH 22-052
DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director

SUBJECT
Proposed Development with 22 Rental Townhome Units and Related Site Improvements at 27865 Manon Avenue, Assessor Parcel Number 453-0090-014-00, Requiring Approval of Zone Change, Density Bonus, and Site Plan Review Application 202101491. Ragini Vecham for Sunflower Manon LLC (Applicant and Property Owner)

RECOMMENDATION
That the Council introduce an Ordinance approving the proposed Zone Change (Attachment II), and adopt a resolution approving the proposed Zone Change, Density Bonus, and Site Plan Review application (Attachment III) and related Environmental Consistency Checklist (Attachment VI) based on the analysis set forth in this staff report and based on the Findings and subject to the Conditions of Approval contained in the resolution.

SUMMARY
The applicant is requesting approval of a Zone Change, Density Bonus, and Site Plan Review application to construct a four building, three story townhome development on a vacant infill site located just north of Tennyson Road and west of Huntwood Avenue on Manon Avenue. The development will include 22 rental townhome units, 41 parking spaces, and new site landscaping and open spaces. The project site is located within the Single Family Residential (RS) zoning district and is designated as Medium Density Residential (MDR) in the Hayward 2040 General Plan. The applicant is requesting a rezoning from Single Family Residential (RS) to Medium Density Residential (RM) and a density bonus to accommodate the 22 townhomes proposed with two units designated for very low-income households. As part of the density bonus, the applicant is requesting a waiver to reduce the required front and rear yard setbacks and to reduce the parking requirement for the 3-bedroom units.

On September 8, 2022, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the project. No members of the public spoke during the hearing. Following questions and deliberation, the Commission voted 5-0 to recommend Council approval.

CITY OF HAYWARD Page 1 of 2 Printed on 10/6/2022
powered by Legistar™
File #: PH 22-052

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Ordinance
Attachment III Resolution
Attachment IV Project Plans
Attachment V Affordable Housing and Density Bonus Plan
Attachment VI Environmental Consistency Checklist
Attachment VII Planning Commission Draft Minutes - September 8, 2022 CITY OF HAYWARD Page 2 of 2 Printed on 10/6/2022
powered by Legistar™

Page 1 of 9 ends

DATE: October 11, 2022
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director SUBJECT: Proposed Development with 22 Rental Townhome Units and Related Site Improvements at 27865 Manon Avenue, Assessor Parcel Number 453-0090- 014-00, Requiring Approval of Zone Change, Density Bonus, and Site Plan Review Application 202101491. Ragini Vecham for Sunflower Manon LLC (Applicant and Property Owner)

The development will include 22 rental townhome units, 41 parking spaces, and new site landscaping and open spaces. The project site is located within the Single Family Residential (RS) zoning district and is designated as Medium Density Residential (MDR) in the Hayward 2040 General Plan. The applicant is requesting a rezoning from Single Family Residential (RS) to Medium Density Residential (RM) and a density bonus to accommodate the 22 townhomes proposed with two units designated for very low-income households. As part of the density bonus, the applicant is requesting a waiver to reduce the required front and rear yard setbacks and to reduce the parking requirement for the 3-bedroom units.

Page 2 of 9 ends

BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting approval of a Zone Change, Density Bonus, and Site Plan Review application to construct a four building, three story townhome development on a vacant infill site located just north of Tennyson Road and west of Huntwood Avenue on Manon Avenue.

Planning Commission. On September 8, 2022, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the project. No members of the public spoke during the hearing.

Following questions and deliberation, the Commission voted 5-0 to recommend Council approval. The draft minutes from the Planning Commission meeting are included as Attachment VII to this staff report.

DISCUSSION
Existing Site Conditions. The project site is an approximately one-acre lot situated 150-feet north of Tennyson Road and one block west of Huntwood Avenue. The site is 143-feet deep with 320 lineal-feet of frontage along Manon Avenue. The topography of the property is relatively flat. Currently, the site is vacant with no trees or significant vegetation.

Surrounding development and land uses include single family residential development to the north and west, two story multifamily development to the east and commercial uses to the south along Tennyson. Additionally, the site is approximately one-half mile west of the South Hayward BART station and within a quarter-mile of Cesar Chavez Middle School, Tennyson Park, Mia’s Dream Playground, and the future Stack Center.

Proposed Project. As shown in the project plans (Attachment IV), the proposed development would feature four buildings comprised of a total of 22 townhomes. The three-story buildings are oriented so that the shorter ends of the structures face Manon Avenue and the single-family residential properties to the west, minimizing the perceived massing of the new structures. A u-shaped access road circulates through the site providing access to each townhome’s one car garage as well as an additional 19 uncovered parking spaces at the rear of the site. A landscaped paseo-style pedestrian walkway and common open space area are located in the center of the site and additional trees and landscaping create a buffer to the surrounding development. Each townhome has its own patio and balcony, providing for private open space as well.

The architecture takes a modern approach, incorporating varied roof lines and wall planes; projecting balconies and patio covers; a mix of wood, stucco, and metal elements; and 360

Page 3 of 9 ends

degree design with architectural interest on each facade. The proposed 22 townhomes range from three to five bedrooms in size, while each has four bathrooms (1,671 to 2,307 square feet of living area per townhome). All will be rental units and as detailed further below, two will be restricted to be rented at levels affordable to Very Low-income households.

As stated above, there are no existing trees onsite. The proposed project’s landscape plan includes the installation of 17 new trees as well as a lush palette of additional shrubbery, groundcovers, and ornamental plantings. The next section further discusses compliance with the City’s General Plan and Municipal Code requirements.

Policy Context and Code Compliance
General Plan. The project site is designated Medium Density Residential (MDR) 1 in the
Hayward 2040 General Plan, which allows for a residential density range of 8.7 to 17.4 dwelling units per net acre. While the proposed project exceeds the allowable General Plan density at approximately 22 dwelling units per acre, as discussed further below, the requested Density Bonus allows for the additional proposed units. The MDR land use designation generally applies to suburban and urban areas that contain a mix of housing types. Typical building types include single-family homes, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, townhomes, and multi-story apartment and condominium buildings.

The project is consistent with numerous goals and policies of the General Plan in that the development will increase the housing stock within the City of Hayward, provide on-site affordable units, and take advantage of easy access to the South Hayward BART station as well as nearby parks, schools, and amenities. The project consistency with the Hayward 2040 General Plan goals and policies are discussed in greater detail in the findings section of the attached Resolution (Attachment III).

Zoning Ordinance. The project site is within the Single Family Residential (RS) zoning district. The RS district does not allow for townhomes nor the proposed project density, so as a result, the applicant is requesting a rezoning of the parcel to Medium Density Residential (RM). The RM district seeks to promote and encourage a suitable environment for family life in areas where a compatible mingling of single-family and multiple-family dwellings is possible. As proposed, the development complies with the development standards of the RM zoning district, as demonstrated in Table 1 below.

Further, if the property remained zoned as RS, the full range of residential types and densities described in the General Plan for the MDR land use designation would not be possible.

In order to approve the proposed Zone Change and Site Plan Review, Council must make the following required findings:

1 Hayward 2040 General Plan, Residential Land Use Designations: https://www.hayward2040generalplan.com/land-use/residential

Page 4 of 9 ends

Zone Change
 Substantial proof exists that the proposed change will promote the public health, safety, convenience, and general welfare of the residents of Hayward;  The proposed change is in conformance with the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance and all applicable, officially adopted policies and plans;  Streets and public facilities existing or proposed are adequate to serve all uses permitted when the property is reclassified; and
 All uses permitted when the property is reclassified will be compatible with present and potential future uses, and further, a beneficial effect will be achieved which is not obtainable under existing regulations.

Site Plan Review
 The development is compatible with on-site and surrounding structures and uses and is an attractive addition to the City;
 The development takes into consideration physical and environmental constraints;  The development complies with the intent of City development policies and regulations; and
 The development will be operated in a manner determined to be acceptable and compatible with surrounding development.

Staff has included additional analysis to support the proposed findings for approval in Attachment III.

Density Bonus. The applicant is requesting a Density Bonus, two waivers from standards in the Hayward Municipal Code, and a reduction in parking pursuant to Section 65915 of the Government Code.2 A density bonus is a zoning tool granted by State law that allows for an increase in density with concessions and/or waivers to development standards when affordable housing units are included on-site.

According to the submitted Affordable Housing and Density Bonus Plan (Attachment V), the applicant is proposing to restrict two units with rents affordable to Very Low-Income households in accordance with State Density Bonus Law. In exchange, the applicant is entitled to a 38.5 percent density increase, which allows for the additional five units proposed.

In addition to increased density, State Law also affords density bonus projects a reduced parking standard for certain units. For this project, the 10 three-bedroom units only require

1.5 parking spaces per unit, instead of the 2.1 parking spaces that would typically be required by the Municipal Code. The 12 four- and five-bedroom units are still required to provide 2.1 parking spaces per unit.

In exchange for restricting two dwelling units as affordable to Very Low-Income households, the project is further entitled to up to three concessions and unlimited waivers from development standards as necessary. Pursuant to State law, the City shall grant the concessions and waivers proposed by the developer unless it finds that the proposed

2 Section 65915 of Government Code (State Density Bonus Law):
http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=65915.&lawCode=GOV

Page 5 of 9 ends

concessions do not result in identifiable and actual cost reductions or the waivers are not necessary to construct the project at the permitted density. Proposed concessions and waivers could be rejected if they would cause a public health or safety problem, cause an environmental problem, harm historical property, or are contrary to law.

While the applicant has requested no concessions as part of their Density Bonus application, the following two waivers are requested:

1. Waiver #1 –Front Yard Setback: The RM zoning district requires a 20-foot minimum front yard setback. All four proposed buildings encroach into the required front yard setback. The majority of the building facades would be setback 11-feet 4-inches from the front property line, while the front porch entryways would be setback 6-feet 11-inches.

This reduced setback is necessary to maintain the required widths of the proposed onecar garages in each townhome, meaning that if the front setback standard was enforced, the project would not be able to be constructed at the permitted density. Additionally, there is an existing five-foot landscape buffer in the public right of way between the front property line and the back of the sidewalk, which effectively will make the proposed front setbacks appear to be 16-feet 4-inches and 11-feet 11-inches respectively.

2. Waiver #2 –Rear Yard Setback: The RM zoning district requires a 20-foot minimum rear yard setback. The project proposes a 13-foot setback for Buildings A and D due to limited space and the site constraints discussed above.

As shown in Table 1, the project complies with all applicable zoning requirements with the proposed rezoning of the property to RM and the Density Bonus provisions and waivers permitted by State law.

Table 1: Zoning Compliance with Rezoning to RM and Density Bonus Standard HMC (RM)/GP Requirement Proposed Consistent?
Density
With Density Bonus

17.4 du/ac
24 du/ac

22.4 du/ac Yes (with Rezoning
and Density Bonus)
Lot Coverage 40% 40% Yes
Setbacks
Front
Side
Rear
20’ minimum
10’ minimum
20’ minimum
6’ 11” minimum
10’ minimum
13’ minimum
Yes (with Density
Bonus)*
Building Height 40’ maximum 39’ maximum Yes
Parking
With Density Bonus
47 spaces
41 spaces
41 spaces Yes (with Density
Bonus)
Open Space 350 s.f./unit (7,700 s.f.) 8,662 s.f. Yes
*Requested Density Bonus Waiver
Housing Element, RHNA & Affordable Housing. Local jurisdictions report progress annually on meeting their Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) goals which are included in the City’s Housing Element. The following table demonstrates progress made toward meeting

Page 6 of 9 ends

Hayward’s RHNA goals for the period between 2015-2023 as of the last report year (2020), which is shown in the column titled “Reported 2020.” The State allows local jurisdictions to “report” the units when building permits are issued to construct the units. The “Approved” and “Pending Approval” columns provide an estimate of potential compliance by counting both entitled projects and projects going through the entitlement process.

Table 2: 2023 RHNA Goal Progress in the City of Hayward Income
Category*
Unit
Goal
Reported
2020 Approved Pending Approval
Estimated
Compliance
Estimated
Deficiency
Units % of
Goal Units % of Goal Units % of Goal Units % of Goal Units % of Goal Very low 851 168 20% 293 34% 26 3% 487 57% 364 43%
Low 480 174 36% 226 47% 4 1% 404 84% 76 16%
Moderate 608 128 21% 60 10% 0 0% 188 31% 420 69%
*The City has achieved the Above Market Rate RHNA housing goals for the 2015-2023 RHNA cycle.

The proposed project is subject to the requirements set forth in HMC Chapter 10, Article 17, Affordable Housing Ordinance.3 An applicant may satisfy the requirements of the ordinance by paying an affordable housing in lieu fee or including affordable units within the proposed development. Pursuant to HMC Section 10-17.215, rental projects shall deed restrict no less than 6 percent of units on-site for Low- and Very Low-Income households. Further, the affordable units shall be integrated within the proposed residential development, shall be of similar or the same quality and provide access to the same amenities as the market rate units pursuant to HMC Section 10-17.220. As specified in Attachment V, the applicant is meeting and exceeding the AHO requirements by providing a total of two units as affordable to Very Low-Income households.

SB330 and Housing Crisis Act. In 2019, the State of California adopted new legislation (SB330) that is intended to address the State’s housing crisis. SB330 strengthens the Housing Accountability Act (Government Code Section 65589.5), which states that a housing development project that complies with the objective standards of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance must be approved by the City, unless the City is able to make specific written findings. The proposed project includes a zone change from RS to RM, and as a result, is not eligible for SB 330 streamlining.

Environmental Review
In 2014, the City certified the EIR for the Hayward 2040 General Plan4. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, projects consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified may not require additional review unless there may be project-specific effects that are peculiar to the project or site that were not adequately addressed in the EIR for the General Plan.

3 HMC Chapter 10, Article 17, Affordable Housing Ordinance:
https://library.municode.com/ca/hayward/codes/municipal_code?nodeId=HAYWARD_MUNICIPAL_CODE_CH10PLZOSU_ART17AFHOO R
4 Hayward 2040 General Plan EIR: https://www.hayward-ca.gov/your-government/documents/planning-documents

Page 7 of 9 ends

As the proposed project is consistent with the site’s Medium Density Residential General Plan land use designation, an Infill Consistency checklist was prepared (Attachment VI), which tiers off the Hayward 2040 General Plan EIR. The checklist concludes that the proposed project would not have any significant effects on the environment that have not already been analyzed in a prior EIR, are more significant than previously analyzed, or that uniformly applicable development policies would not substantially mitigate. As a result, no further environmental analysis is required.

Staff Analysis
Staff believes Council can make the required Findings to approve the Zone Change, Density Bonus, and Site Plan Review application based on the analysis provided herein and included within the required Findings in Attachment III. The proposed project complies with the applicable development standards and meets the intent of the RM zoning district as well as the goals and policies of the Hayward 2040 General Plan.

The proposed development includes 22 new housing units, including two rental units that will be affordable to Very Low-Income households. With the requested State mandated density bonus, not only is the proposed project consistent with the underlying Medium Density Residential General Plan land use designation, but it provides a higher density of units within walking and biking distance of the South Hayward BART station, allowing for easy commuting to and from the site. In addition, a number of other community facilities and amenities are within a quarter mile of the site, including Tennyson Park, which features a popular all-abilities playground, the Matt Jimenez Community Center, and the future Stack Center, which will house health and dental clinics, a childcare center, and community meeting rooms.

As designed, the project and proposed rezoning is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood as the proposed townhomes are directly across the street from other multifamily housing on RM zoned land and adjacent to commercial spaces. New landscaping will help buffer the site from lower density single family housing on RS zoned land to the west and north. While reductions to the required setbacks were requested as waivers within the Density Bonus application, bigger reductions were proposed along the front property line to preserve as much distance as possible from the existing single-family homes to the rear of the project. Additionally, the alignment of the short sides of the buildings with the front and rear of the property reduces the visual bulk and massing of the project, helping it to better fit with the existing surrounding development.

ECONOMIC IMPACT
The proposed development would have a positive economic benefit in that it would result in the development of a vacant infill parcel with 22 new rental townhome units that would improve the appearance of the site and help to increase the property values in the adjoining residential neighborhood. The project’s residents would generate additional retail sales tax

Page 8 of 9 ends

for the City through their everyday expenditures at local businesses, and the project would also generate temporary construction jobs during its development.

FISCAL IMPACT
The project would generate annual revenue from property taxes while requiring annual costs related to City services, including but not limited to Fire, Police, Library and Maintenance Services. Communities sometimes attempt to quantify positive or negative fiscal impacts to help decide if a particular development project should move forward. While an important planning tool for city resource allocation, this data does not account for other elements or community benefits the project may provide that address Council priorities and policies. These benefits, such as increasing housing supply to help stabilize housing costs, promoting equity and housing opportunities for lower income households, and adding new consumers to the City’s population that can support its businesses and help attract new ones, offer possible offsets for negative fiscal impacts.

STRATEGIC ROADMAP
This project supports the Strategic Priority of Preserve, Protect and Produce Housing for All in that it would add 22 new rental townhomes to the City’s housing stock, including two units that would be affordable to very low-income households. It would also protect the existing homes in the surrounding neighborhood by introducing a compatible land use that complements the existing development pattern of the area.

SUSTAINABILITY FEATURES
The proposed project would comply with the California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) and the City’s Reach Code by featuring all-electric townhomes that contain no gas-powered appliances, garages with parking spaces that are electric vehicle-ready, and solar roofs on each building. All landscaping is subject to the Bay-Friendly Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public Outreach. On April 23, 2021, a Notice of Application Receipt was sent to 289 addresses, including all property owners, businesses, and residents within a 300-foot radius of the project site, as well as interested parties including the Harder-Tennyson Neighborhood Task Force, Harder-Tennyson Community Organization, South Hayward Neighborhood Group, Tennyson-Alquire Neighborhood Task Force, and South Hayward Parish. In response to this notice, staff received one request from a member of the public to view the project plans.

On July 1, 2022, a Notice of Public Hearing for the Planning Commission public hearing was circulated to a mailing list of 262 property owners, businesses, residents and interested stakeholders within a 300-foot radius of the project site as well as published within The Daily Review newspaper as a Legal Ad. The hearing date was later postponed from July 14, 2022,

Page 9 of 9 ends

to September 8, 2022, and as a result, a second notice was sent on August 26, 2022, to the same mailing list and an additional ad was published in The Daily Review with the rescheduled hearing date. No additional correspondence on the proposed project was received in response to these ads and mailings.

On September 30, 2022, a Notice of Public Hearing for the Council public hearing was circulated to the same mailing list of 262 property owners, businesses, residents and interested stakeholders within a 300-foot radius of the project site as well as published within The Daily Review newspaper as a Legal Ad. As of the writing of this staff report, no additional correspondence on the proposed project has been received.

NEXT STEPS
If approved, the proposed Zone Change will be reviewed by the Council for a second reading for adoption. The proposed Density Bonus and Site Plan Review will be effective immediately.

Prepared by: Elizabeth Blanton, AICP, Senior Planner
Recommended by: Sara Buizer, AICP, Deputy Development Services Director Jennifer Ott, Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director Approved by:
_________________________________
Kelly McAdoo, City Manager

ATTACHMENT II
ORDINANCE NO. 22-__
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10, ARTICLE 1 (ZONING ORDINANCE)

OF THE HAYWARD MUNICIPAL CODE BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY

FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO MEDIUM DENSITY

RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT IN CONNECTION WITH ZONE CHANGE, DENSITY BONUS, AND SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 202101491 TO ACCOMMODATE 22 RENTAL TOWNHOMES AT 27865 MANON AVENUE
WHEREAS, on October 11, 2022, the City Council held a public hearing and adopted findings in support of the requested zone change as set forth in the companion Resolution (No. 22-___);

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HAYWARD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Provisions.

Chapter 10 of the Hayward Municipal Code is hereby amended to rezone the property located at 27865 Manon Avenue (APN 453-0090-014-00) from RS (Single Family Residential) to RM (Medium Density Residential District) to accommodate the construction of 22 new rental townhomes with common open space and related improvements, subject to the findings and conditions of approval set forth in the companion Resolution (No. 22-___) to this Ordinance.

Section 2. Severance.

Should any part of this ordinance be declared by a final decision by a court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional, invalid or beyond authority of the City, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, which shall continue in full force and effect, provided the remainder of the ordinance, absent the excised portion, can be reasonably interpreted to give effect to intentions of the City Council.

Section 3. Effective Date.

This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.

Page 2 of 2 ends

INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hayward, held the _____ day of _____, 2022, by Council Member __________________________.

ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hayward, held the _____ day of _____, 2022, by the following votes of members of said City Council.

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MAYOR:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

APPROVED:
_____________________________________________________
Mayor of the City of Hayward
DATE: _____________________________________________
ATTEST:
_____________________________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Hayward
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________________
City Attorney of the City of Hayward

ATTACHMENT III

Page 1 of 26 ends

HAYWARD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 22-____
Introduced by Councilmember __________

RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSISTENCY CHECKLIST

AND APPROVING THE ZONE CHANGE, DENSITY BONUS, AND SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PERTAINING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF 22 NEW RENTAL TOWNHOMES AT A SITE LOCATED AT 27865 MANON AVENUE WHEREAS, On April 12, 2021, Ragini Vecham for Sunflower Manon LLC (Applicant and Owner) submitted Zone Change, Density Bonus, and Site Plan Review Application No. 202101491 to allow the construction of 22 rental townhomes with common open space area and related site improvements on a site located at 27865 Manon Avenue (APN 453- 0090-014-00); and
WHEREAS, An Environmental Consistency Checklist was prepared to assess the potential environmental impacts of the Project; and
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission considered the Project at a public hearing held on September 8, 2022 and recommended that the City Council adopt the Environmental Consistency Checklist and approve Zone Change, Density Bonus, and Site Plan Review Application No. 202101491; and
WHEREAS, Notice of the hearing was published in the manner required by law and the hearing was duly held by the City Council on October 11, 2022.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby finds and determines as follows:

ZONE CHANGE FINDINGS
Pursuant to Section 10-1.3425 of the Hayward Municipal Code (HMC), the Council may approve a Zone Change application when all of the following findings are met:

A. Substantial proof exists that the proposed change will promote the public health, safety, convenience, and general welfare of the residents of Hayward; The site’s General Plan land use designation is Medium Density Residential, which envisions a mix of single-family and multifamily residential development nearby neighborhood serving uses, in order to create more complete, walkable, and sustainable neighborhoods. Rezoning the site from Single Family Residential (RS) to Medium Density Residential (RM) will not only bring the zoning in alignment with the

ATTACHMENT III

Page 2 of 26 ends

MDR General Plan land use designation, but it will also create a benefit to the neighborhood and community at large by providing the opportunity for more units within a half mile of the South Hayward BART station and within a quarter mile of other community amenities, such as Tennyson Park, Cesar Chavez Middle School and the future Stack Center. Further, the properties across Manon Avenue are also zoned as RM, meaning that the rezoning of this property will create a more cohesive look at the southern terminus of Manon, just north of the mix of comercial and residential uses along Tennyson Road.

B. The proposed change is in conformance with the purposes of the Zoning Ordinance and all applicable, officially adopted policies and plans; As stated in Section 10-1.115 of the Hayward Municipal Code, the Zoning Ordinance is a tool for implementing the goals, objectives and policies of the Hayward 2040 General Plan. As stated above, this property’s RS zoning designation is not consistent with its General Plan land use designation of MDR. Rezoning the property to RM brings the property’s zoning in alignment with the General Plan, as is the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and required by State law.

The MDR General Plan land use designation allows for a residential density range of

8.7 to 17.4 dwelling units per net acre. While the proposed project’s density exceeds this range at 22.4 dwelling units per acre, the number of units proposed is permitted under State Density Bonus law due to two on-site deed-restricted units that will be made affordable to Very Low-Income households. The project is further consistent with applicable General Plan policies in that it will increase the housing inventory for the City of Hayward and is considered an infill development that will increase density and result in a more complete neighborhood.

The project supports the following General Plan policies:
• Land Use Policy LU-1.3 – Growth and Infill Development. The City shall direct local population and employment growth toward infill development sites within the city, especially the catalyst and opportunity sites identified in the Economic Development Strategic Plan.
• Economic Development Policy ED-5.5– Quality Development. The City shall require new development to include quality site, architectural and landscape design features to improve and protect the appearance and reputation of Hayward.
• Housing Policy H-3.1 – Diversity of Housing Types. The City shall implement land use policies that allow for a range of residential densities and housing types, prices, ownership, and size, including low-density single family uses, moderatedensity townhomes, and higher-density apartments, condominiums, transitoriented developments, live-work units, and units in mixed-use developments.

ATTACHMENT III

Page 3 of 26 ends

• Housing Policy H-3.4 – Residential Uses Close to Services. The City shall encourage development of residential uses close to employment, recreational facilities, schools, neighborhood commercial areas, and transportation routes.

C. Streets and public facilities existing or proposed are adequate to serve all uses permitted when the property is reclassified; and
The vacant infill site is located in the middle of an established neighborhood with a built-out street grid and adequate public infrastructure and utilities. While the applicant proposes a Zone Change, the proposed development is still consistent with the underlying General Plan land use designation of MDR, which anticipated the development of a range of residential uses, including townhomes within this area.

D. All uses permitted when the property is reclassified will be compatible with present and potential future uses, and further, a beneficial effect will be achieved which is not obtainable under existing regulations.

When rezoned from RS to RM, the site will still allow residential units by right, though a greater range of housing types will be permitted, including townhomes and multifamily dwellings. Besides the greater variety of residential types that are permitted in the RM district, the only other deviations in permitted and conditionally permitted uses between the two zoning districts is that apiaries and wind energy conversion systems are not allowed in the RM district, while boarding homes and dormitories are.

Given that the types of residential uses permitted in the RM district directly align with what is envisioned for the MDR land use designation in the Hayward 2040 General Plan, the proposed rezoning is compatible with the planned future development of the neighborhood. Further, if the property remained zoned as RS, the full range of residential types and densities described in the General Plan for the MDR land use designation would not be possible.

SITE PLAN REVIEW FINDINGS
Pursuant to Hayward Municipal Code Section 10-1.3025, the Council may approve an application when all of the following findings are made:

A. The development is compatible with on-site and surrounding structures and uses and is an attractive addition to the City;
The proposed development is compatible with surrounding structures and uses in that the project consists of four three-story residential buildings, which are similar in massing and scale with other multifamily residential development across Manon Avenue. The site is also bordered by commercial uses to the south and is nearby a number of other amenties, including the South Hayward BART Station, Tennyson Park, Cesar Chavez Middle School, and the future Stack Center. The result is a mixed-

ATTACHMENT III

Page 4 of 26 ends

use, mixed residential density neighborhood that is aligned with the goals of the Hayward 2040 General Plan.

The proposed buildings are attractively designed, incorporating varied roof lines and wall planes, projecting balconies and patio covers, and a mix of wood, stucco, and metal elements to create visual interest. The site features all new landscaping, serving to further beautify Manon Avenue.

B. The development takes into consideration physical and environmental constraints;
The development takes into consideration physical and environmental constraints in that the proposed project is situated on a 0.98-acre vacant infill site that will accommodate four new residential buildings, on-site parking, common and private open spaces, and functional site circulation. The site is generally flat with site dimensions of 143 feet deep with 320 linear feet of frontage. The existing site does not have value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species; and, as conditioned, construction of the project would not result in any significant impacts relating to noise, air quality or water quality. The project site is within City limits and is adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

C. The development complies with the intent of City development policies and regulations; and
As specified in Findings above, the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Hayward 2040 General Plan, including the Medium Density Residential land use designation, the Medium Density Residential zoning district, and all other relevant requirements and standards in the Hayward Municipal Code.

D. The development will be operated in a manner determined to be acceptable and compatible with surrounding development.

The development will be operated in a manner determined to be acceptable and compatible with surrounding developments in that the proposed project will result in the construction of a multifamily residential complex, similar to other residential uses adjacent to the project site, along Manon Avenue. Multi-family residential is permitted by-right within the RM zoning district, and a mix of single-family and multifamily uses is intended within the MDR General Plan land use designation.

Additionally, during construction, the proposed project will be subject to all applicable provisions of the Hayward Municipal Code for construction, maintenance, landscaping etc. The proposed development will be required to adhere to the Conditions of Approval (Attachment III) which will require the project to adhere to standard procedures of site preparation and development, including permitted hours of construction activity as well as the incorporation of Best Management Practices

ATTACHMENT III

Page 5 of 26 ends

(BMPs) for construction noise, grading, and use of equipment to prevent adverse negative impacts onto adjacent properties.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183.3, an Infill Checklist was prepared for this project with the finding that no additional environmental review is required. The purpose of an Infill Checklist is to streamline the environmental review process for eligible infill projects by limiting the topics subject to review to the project level in cases when the potential impacts of infill development have been previously considered in another environmental analysis or would be addressed by uniformly applicable development policies. The Infill Checklist for this project tiers off of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Hayward 2040 General Plan and confirms that the project would not have any significant effects on the environment that either have not already been analyzed in the Hayward 2040 General Plan EIR, are more significant than previously analyzed, or would not be substantially mitigated by uniformly applicable development policies.

B. The proposed Infill Checklist was independently reviewed, considered, and analyzed by the Planning Commission and reflects the independent judgement of the Planning Commission; such independent judgement is based on substantial evidence in the record (even though there may be differences between or among the different sources of information and opinions offered in the documents, testimony, public comments and such responses that make up the administrative record as a whole); the Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the proposed Infill Checklist and its findings and conclusions as its source of environmental information; and the proposed Infill Checklist is legally adequate and was completed in compliance with CEQA.

C. The proposed Infill Checklist identified all potential adverse impacts and based on the Infill Checklist and the whole record before the Planning Commission, there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment.

D. The project complies with CEQA, and the proposed Infill Checklist was presented to the Planning Commission, which reviewed and considered the information contained therein prior to recommending approval of the Project. The custodian of the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based is the Development Services Department of the City of Hayward, located at 777 B Street, Hayward, California 94544.

ATTACHMENT III

Page 6 of 26 ends

NOW THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hayward, based on the foregoing findings, hereby adopts the Environmental Consistency Checklist and approves Zone Change, Density Bonus, and Site Plan Review Application No. 202101491, subject to the adoption of the companion ordinance (Ordinance No. 22-____) rezoning the property located on a site at 27865 Manon Avenue, Accessor Parcel Number (APN) 453- 0090-014-00, subject to the attached conditions of approval.

IN COUNCIL, HAYWARD, CALIFORNIA _______________________, 2022 ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MAYOR:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: ______________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Hayward
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________________
City Attorney of the City of Hayward

ATTACHMENT III

Page 7 of 26 ends

CITY OF HAYWARD PLANNING COMMISSION

ZONE CHANGE, DENSITY BONUS, AND SITE PLAN REVIEW

MANON TOWNHOMES
APPLICATION NO. 202101491
27865 MANON AVENUE

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

GENERAL

1. The developer shall assume the defense of and shall pay on behalf of and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, volunteers and agents from and against any or all loss, liability, expense, claim costs, suits and damages of every kind, nature and description directly or indirectly arising from the performance and action of this permit.

2. Site Plan is approved subject to the Architectural, Civil and Landscape plans stamped May 13, 2022, May 12, 2022, and May 12, 2022, respectively, except as modified by the conditions listed below. Any proposal for alterations to the conditionally approved site plan and/or design that does not require a variance to any zoning ordinance standard shall be subject to review and approval by the Approving Body. Alterations requiring a variance shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission, if applicable.

3. The permittee, property owner or designated representative shall allow the City’s staff to access the property for site inspection(s) to confirm all approved conditions have been completed and are being maintained in compliance with all adopted city, state and federal laws.

4. Failure to comply with any of the conditions set forth in this approval, or as subsequently amended in writing by the City, may result in failure to obtain a building final and/or a Certificate of Occupancy until full compliance is reached. The City' s requirement for full compliance may require minor corrections and/ or complete demolition of a non-compliant improvement regardless of costs incurred where the project does not comply with design requirements and approvals that the applicant agreed to when permits were filed to construct the project.

5. All outstanding fees owed to the City, including permit charges and staff time spent processing or associated with the development review of this application shall be paid in full prior to any consideration of a request for approval extensions and/or the issuance of a building permit.

6. If determined to be necessary for the protection of the public peace, safety and general welfare, the City of Hayward may impose additional conditions or

ATTACHMENT III

Page 8 of 26 ends

restrictions on this permit. Violations of any approved land use conditions or requirements will result in further enforcement action by the Code Enforcement Division. Enforcement includes, but is not limited to, fines, fees/penalties, special assessment, liens, or any other legal remedy required to achieve compliance including the City of Hayward instituting a revocation hearing before the Planning Commission.

7. A copy of these conditions of approval shall be scanned and included on a separate, full-sized sheet(s) in the building permit plan check set.

8. The Planning Director or designee may revoke this permit for failure to comply with, or complete all, conditions of approval or improvements indicated on the approved plans.

9. The owner shall maintain in good repair all building exteriors, walls, lighting, drainage facilities, landscaping, driveways, and parking areas. The premises shall be kept clean and weed-free.

10. The applicant shall be responsible for graffiti-free maintenance of the property and shall remove any graffiti within 48 hours of occurrence or City notification.

11. The applicant shall apply for and obtain all necessary permits from the City and/or outside agencies prior to any site work.

12. Within 60 days of following the issuance of a building permit and prior to construction, the applicant shall install one non-illuminated “Coming Soon” sign on the project site that includes a project rendering, a project summary, and developer contact information. The sign shall be constructed of wood or recyclable composite material, be placed in a location at least ten (10) feet back from the property line, and shall not impede pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular visibility or circulation. The sign shall be maintained in accordance with Section 10-7-709 of the Hayward Municipal Code and may be up to thirty-two (32) square feet of sign area and shall not exceed ten (10) feet in height. Sign design, size and location shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to placement.

13. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy and/or Final Building Permit approval, the applicant shall contact the Planning Division and be subject to a site inspection by the designated project planner to verify that all applicable mitigations and conditions of approval, including architectural materials, colors and design, have been satisfied. The cost of inspection, including any subsequent inspections that are deemed necessary by the City, shall be paid by the applicant.

MAILBOXES/ADDRESSES

14. Mailboxes shall be installed in accordance with Post Office policy and include locking mechanisms to minimize opportunities for theft.

ATTACHMENT III

Page 9 of 26 ends

15. Property addresses will be assigned by the Development Services Department prior to issuance of a building permit.

LIGHTING

16. All lighting fixtures shall incorporate a shield to allow for downward illumination.

No spillover lighting to adjacent properties is permitted and all exterior lighting on walls, patios or balconies shall be recessed/shielded to minimize visual impacts.

COLORS AND MATERIALS

17. The building colors and materials shown on the building permit plans shall match those shown on the architectural plans, color/material exhibit and/or renderings dated May 13, 2022. Any revision to the approved colors and materials shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of a building permit and/or prior to construction.

18. All vents gutters, downspouts, flashings, electrical conduits, etc. shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent material unless specifically designed as an architectural element.

SCREENING OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT

19. All exterior and rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened or located away from public view. Mechanical and rooftop equipment shall include, but is not limited to, electrical panels, pull boxes, air conditioning units, gas meters, and swimming pool equipment. All rooftop screening and mechanical equipment shall be shown on the project plans and be subject to final review and approval by City staff prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. All screening shall be compatible with respect to forms and materials used on the building.

20. If permitted, all above-ground utility meters, air conditioners, mechanical equipment and water meters shall be enclosed within the buildings or shall be screened with shrubs and/or an architectural screen from all perspectives, unless other noise mitigation is required. All equipment shall be designed to be compatible with respect to location, form, design, exterior materials, and noise generation. The applicant shall obtain planning division review and approval prior to issuance of any permits.

SIGNAGE

21. No signs are approved with this project. Any signs placed on-site or off-site shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division and a Sign Permit application shall be required, consistent with Hayward Municipal Code Sign Ordinance requirements.

ATTACHMENT III

Page 10 of 26 ends

IMPACT FEES

22. This development is subject to the requirements of the Property Developers – Obligations for Parks and Recreation set forth in HMC Chapter 10, Article 16. Per HMC Section 10-16.10, the applicant shall pay impact fees. The impact fees shall be the rate that is in effect at the time of building permit issuance.

ENVIRONMENTAL

23. If human remains, archaeological resources, prehistoric or historic artifacts are discovered during construction or excavation, the following procedures shall be followed: Construction and/or excavation activities shall cease immediately and the Planning Division shall be notified. A qualified archaeologist shall be retained to determine whether any such materials are significant prior to resuming groundbreaking construction activities. Standardized procedure for evaluation accidental finds and discovery of human remains shall be followed as prescribed in Sections 15064.f and 151236.4 of the California Environmental Quality Act.

24. In the event that cultural resources of Native American origin are identified during construction, all earth disturbing work within the vicinity of the find must be temporarily suspended or redirected until an archaeologist has evaluated the nature and significance of the find and an appropriate Native American representative, based on the nature of the find, is consulted. If the City determines that the resource is a tribal cultural resource and thus significant under CEQA, a mitigation plan shall be prepared and implemented in accordance with state guidelines and in consultation with Native American groups. The plan would include avoidance of the resource or, if avoidance of the resource is infeasible, the plan would outline the appropriate treatment of the resource in coordination with the archeologist and the appropriate Native American tribal representative.

25. As applicable, if project construction activities occur between February 15 and August 31, a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre-construction survey for nesting birds no more than 14 days prior to construction. The survey shall include the entire project site and a 300-foot buffer to account for nesting raptors. If nests are found, the qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate species-specific avoidance buffer of sufficient size to prevent disturbance to the nest by project activity (up to 300 feet for raptors, up to 150 feet for all other birds). The qualified biologist shall perform at least two hours of pre-construction monitoring of the nest to characterize "typical" bird behavior. During construction, if active nests are present, the qualified biologist shall monitor the nesting birds to determine if construction activities are causing disturbance to the bird and shall increase the buffer if it is determined the birds are showing signs of unusual or distressed behavior associated with project activities. Atypical nesting behaviors that may cause reproductive harm include, but are not limited to, defensive flights, vocalizations directed towards project personnel/activities, standing up from a brooding position,

ATTACHMENT III

Page 11 of 26 ends

and flying away from the nest. The qualified biologist shall have authority, through the resident engineer, to order the cessation of all project activities if the nesting birds exhibit atypical behavior that may cause reproductive failure (nest abandonment and loss of eggs and/or young) until a refined appropriate buffer is established. To prevent encroachment, the established buffer(s) should be marked clearly by high visibility material. The established buffer(s) should remain in effect until the young have fledged or the nest has been abandoned, as confirmed by the qualified biologist. Any sign of nest abandonment should be reported to the City and CDFW within 48 hours. The monitoring biologist, in consultation with the resident engineer and project manager shall determine the appropriate protection for active nests on a case-by-case basis using the criteria described above.

26. The following control measures for geologic hazards shall be adhered to, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Director or City Engineer. Per standard City project approval procedures, the City must review final project design plans for conformity with building code requirements prior to project construction. All earthwork, including site grading, wall foundation excavations, placement and compaction of engineered fill, and final surface drainage installation, would be performed in accordance with the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report, as applicable.

27. The following control measures for construction noise, grading and construction activities shall be adhered to, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Director or City Engineer:
a. Construction activities shall occur in conformance with the City’s Municipal Code unless otherwise permitted by the City Engineer or Chief Building Official;
b. Grading and construction equipment shall be properly muffled; c. Stationary noise-generating construction equipment, such as compressors, shall be located as far as practical from occupied residential housing units; d. Applicant/developer shall designate a "noise disturbance coordinator" who will be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise; and
e. Letters shall be mailed to surrounding property owners and residents within 300 feet of the project boundary with this information.

28. In order to meet the BAAQMD fugitive dust threshold, the following BAAQMD Basic Construction Mitigation Measures shall be implemented:
a. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day.

ATTACHMENT III

Page 12 of 26 ends

b. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off‐site shall be covered.
c. All visible mud or dirt tracked‐out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited.
d. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. e. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible.
f. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used.
g. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points.
h. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation.
i. A publicly visible sign shall be posted with the telephone number and person to contact at the City of Hayward regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The BAAQMD phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.

EXPIRATION

29. In accordance with Hayward Municipal Code (HMC) Section 10- 1.3055, approval of this Site Plan Review is void 36 months after the effective date of approval unless:
a. Prior to the expiration of the 36-month period, a building permit application has been submitted and accepted for processing by the Building Official or his/ her designee. If a building permit is issued for construction of improvements authorized by this approval, said approval shall be void two years after issuance of the building permit, or three years after approval of the application, whichever is later, unless the construction authorized by the building permit has been substantially completed or substantial sums have been expended in reliance on this approval; or

ATTACHMENT III

Page 13 of 26 ends

b. A time extension of the approval has been granted by the Development Services Director or his/her designee, which requires that a request for an extension of this approval must be submitted in writing to the Planning Division at least 15 days prior to the expiration date of this approval.

BUILDING

30. All of the proposed buildings in this project fall under a new local green building ordinance called the "Reach Code". This local regulation modifies the CA Energy Code to prohibit natural gas in new one and two-family buildings. The Reach Code requires these units to be designed as all-electric buildings. To offset any increased costs of all-electric designs, do not bring natural gas infrastructure to the site. The reach code also expands CalGreen's requirements for EV charging infrastructure. To learn more about the Reach Code and to find a checklist for your project, please see the City of Hayward website here: https://www.hayward-ca.gov/reach-code

31. The project will require a building permit application and the associated plan review process. The project shall comply with the building code in effect at the date of building permit submittal. Additional comments will be provided during that review. If you have any code questions or plan review concerns, please don’t hesitate to contact me at [email protected]

LANDSCAPING

32. Source of Future Conflict with Neighboring Properties. All proposed tree canopy shall not encroach over to the neighboring properties to the best practice possible.

Proposed tree canopy shall not hang over existing structure in any of the neighboring properties for possibly creating fire hazard and clogging roof gutter.

Two Quercus agrifolia at both ends of western property shall be replaced with another tree species with smaller canopy or relocate these two trees elsewhere in the project. The same comment applies to two Pistacia chinensis proposed along the western property line. Pistacia canopy will reach beyond 35 feet at maturity and about a half of the canopy will be in the neighboring properties to the west.

33. Irrigation Legend. Controller listed in the legend should read “irrigation controller.”

34. No building permit shall be issued prior to approval of landscape and irrigation improvement plans.

35. Pursuant to HMC Section 10-12.07 (4), a qualified soil testing laboratory shall complete a soil fertility test prior to amending the planting soil and shall provide recommendations for organic compost to bring the soil organic matter to a minimum of 5% by dry weight and incorporating organic fertilizers to recommended levels for planting area. The final testing results, recommendations and organic compost shall be submitted to the project landscape architect for review and approval and shall be submitted to City Landscape Architect prior to

ATTACHMENT III

Page 14 of 26 ends

requesting the final landscape inspection with Appendix C Certification of Completion.

36. Pursuant to HMC Section 10-12.07(a)(4)(D), organic recycled chipped wood mulch in the shade of Dark Brown color shall be placed in all planting area including biotreatment areas. Mulch size shall not exceed 1-1/2-inch in diameter.

37. Any slope exceeds 3:1 but less than 2:1 shall receive jute netting or erosion material regardless of the length of the sloped area before installing mulch.

38. Tree shall be located a minimum of 5 feet from lateral service lines and driveways, a minimum 9 feet from the center line of fire hydrant, a minimum of 15 feet from a light pole, and a minimum of 30 feet from the face of a traffic signal, or as otherwise specified by the City.

39. All final tree locations shall be field verified by the project landscape architect prior to planting and resolve any conflicts arise in the field.

40. Root barriers shall be installed linearly against the paving edge in all instances where a tree is planted within seven feet of pavement or buildings, and as recommended by the manufacturer.

41. All above ground mechanical equipment shall be screened from the street with fivegallon shrubs.

42. Minimum twelve inches wide band of large size exceeding six-inch diameter Noiya Cobblestone shall be provided around overflow catch basin or bubble up basin.

43. All common area landscaping, irrigation and other required improvements shall be installed in accordance with the approved improvement plans prior to acceptance of tract improvements, or occupancy of eighty percent (80%) of the dwelling units, whichever first occurs. Certificate of Completion, as-built Mylar and an Irrigation Schedule shall be submitted upon acceptance of the landscape improvements for the Tract to the Department of Public Works Engineering by the developer.

44. Landscape Maintenance:
a. Landscaping shall be maintained in a healthy, weed-free condition at all times and shall maintain irrigation system to function as designed to reduce runoff, promote surface filtration, and minimize the use of fertilizers and pesticides, which contribute pollution to the Bay.
b. The owner’s representative shall inspect the landscaping on a monthly basis and any dead or dying plants (plants that exhibit over 30% dieback) shall be replaced within ten days of the inspection.

ATTACHMENT III

Page 15 of 26 ends

c. Three inches deep mulch should be maintained in all planting areas. Mulch shall be organic recycled chipped wood in the shades of Dark Brown Color and the size shall not exceed 1-1/2-inch diameter. The depth shall be maintained at three inches deep.
d. All nursery stakes shall be removed during tree installation and staking poles shall be removed when the tree is established or when the trunk diameter of the tree is equal or larger to the diameter of the staking pole. e. All trees planted as a part of the development as shown on the approved landscape plans shall be “Protected” and shall be subjected to Tree Preservation Ordinance. Tree removal and pruning shall require a tree pruning or removal permit prior to removal by City Landscape Architect. f. Any damaged or removed trees without a permit shall be replaced in accordance with Tree Preservation Ordinance or as determined by City Landscape Architect within the timeframe established by the City and pursuant to the Municipal Code.
g. Irrigation system shall be tested periodically to maintain uniform distribution of irrigation water; irrigation controller shall be programed seasonally; irrigation system should be shut-off during winter season; and the whole irrigation system should be flushed and cleaned when the system gets turn on in the spring.

Prior to the Issuance of Building Permit

45. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, detailed landscape and irrigation improvement plans prepared by a licensed landscape architect on an accurately surveyed base plan shall be submitted as a part of grading permit application for approval by the City. The plans shall comply with the City’s Bay-Friendly Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (California Building Code Title 23) and all relevant Municipal Codes. Once approved, a digital file of the approved and the project landscape architect signed improvement plans shall be submitted to the City for the City’s approval signatures. Copies of the signed improvement plans shall be submitted as a part of the building permit submittal.

Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy

46. Upon acceptance of the landscape installation in accordance with the approved landscape improvement plans by the City, As-Built digital plans shall be submitted to the Engineering Department by the developer.

47. HMC Section 10-12.11: In large projects or projects with multiple landscape installations (i.e. production home developments) an auditing rate of one (1) in seven (7) lots or approximately fifteen percent (15 %) will satisfy this requirement.

ATTACHMENT III

Page 16 of 26 ends

All landscape irrigation audits shall be conducted by a third-party certified landscape irrigation auditor. Landscape audits shall not be conducted by the person who designed the landscape or installed the landscape.

48. Prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, all landscape and irrigation shall be completed in accordance to the approved plan and accepted by the City Landscape Architect. Before requesting an inspection from the City Landscape Architect, the project landscape architect shall inspect and accept landscape improvements and shall complete Appendix C. Certificate of Completion in the City’s Bay-Friendly Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. The completed Certificate of Completion Part 1 through Part 7 or applicable parts shall be e-mailed in prior to requesting an inspection from the City Landscape Architect.

ENGINEERING

49. City’s grading permit will be required for the land disturbance and the proposed site improvements. Plans for grading permit shall be prepared by the state licensed and qualified Civil Engineer considering the recommendations of a geotechnical engineering study and the site’s seismic liquefaction potential. Such plans shall require approval of a geotechnical engineer retained by the project developer and the City Engineer.

Prior to Issuance of Building Permit

50. Improvement Plans and related design documents prepared by or under the direction of State licensed and qualified professionals shall be submitted to the City Engineer for all public and private improvements.

51. Applicant shall secure the City Fire Marshal’s approval of Improvements for all weather emergency vehicle access and fire protection before flammable material is brought on-site.

52. All grading shall comply with Chapter 10, Article 8 (Subdivision Ordinance) of the Hayward Municipal Code as determined by the City Engineer. A fine grading and drainage plan prepared by a State licensed civil engineer shall be submitted as part of the Improvement Plans for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of building permits. Developer has the option to apply for a grading permit to rough grade the project site.

53. A soils report prepared by a licensed civil or geotechnical engineer subject to approval by the City Engineer shall be submitted and the grading, retaining walls, surface and sub-surface drainage, lot drainage, and utility trench backfilling shall be designed in accordance with the recommendations of the soils report. Final grading and drainage plans for the grading permit shall be reviewed and signed by the soils report engineer certifying that the recommendations in the report have been followed.

ATTACHMENT III

Page 17 of 26 ends

54. Structural calculations and details prepared by a licensed civil or structural engineer are required for all earth retaining structures greater than 4-feet in height (top of wall to bottom of footing) and shall be reviewed and approved by the Building Division of the Development Services Department.

55. The project shall not block runoff from, or augment runoff to, adjacent properties.

The developer shall be required to mitigate augmented runoff to maintain postdevelopment site discharge rates to less than or equal to pre-development discharge rates to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

56. The Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District’s Hydrology and Hydraulics Criteria Summary shall be used to design the storm drain system.

On site surface drainage shall be collected and conveyed to a public drainage system as per plans approved by the City Engineer. The storm drainage system shall be designed to convey a 10-year storm event.

57. Drainage plans should include all proposed underground pipes, building drains, area drains and inlets. All building sites shall be graded to slope away from the building foundations per California Building Code, Chapter 18, Section 1804.3 Site Grading or as required by the Soils Engineer. On-site collector storm drains shall be sized to minimize potential for blockages. Storm drains shall be designed to prevent standing water.

58. The On-site storm conveyance and treatment systems shall be owned and maintained by the property owner.

59. The project’s Stormwater Control Plan and updated Stormwater Requirements Checklist shall be submitted and shall show, at a minimum, drainage management areas, location and details of all treatment control measures and site design measures, and numeric sizing calculations in conformance with Alameda County Clean Water Program C3 design guidelines.

60. All broken, cracked, or uplifted curb, gutter, and sidewalk shall be removed and replaced along the project frontage. The existing street section shall be removed and replaced to the centerline of the street if the existing pavement is either damaged or the structural section is determined by the City Engineer to be inadequate for the intended traffic.

61. Existing unused or unapproved driveway fronting the project shall be replaced with concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk matching adjoining such improvements in form and color.

62. Street lighting along the development frontage and on-site lighting shall comply with current City lighting standards and the City’s Security Ordinance. Lighting shall be designed by a qualified lighting designer and erected and maintained so that light is confined to the property and will not cast a direct light or glare upon adjacent

ATTACHMENT III

Page 18 of 26 ends

properties or rights-of-way. Photometric analysis/studies shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer.

63. All service to the development shall be an "underground service" designed and installed in accordance with the Pacific Gas and Electric Company, AT&T (phone) Company and local cable company regulations. Transformers and switch gear cabinets shall be placed underground unless otherwise approved by the Planning Director and the City Engineer. Underground utility plans must be submitted for City approval prior to installation. (Required by HMC Section 10-3.815)

64. The developer shall provide and install the appropriate facilities, conduit, junction boxes, etc., to allow for installation of a fiber optic network within the development.

During Construction

65. Construction Stormwater Management: Developer shall be responsible for the preventing the discharge of pollutants (sediments) into the street and/or the public storm drain system from the project site during construction in accordance with the Hayward Municipal Code Section 11-5.19. Projects proposed for construction between October 1st and April 30th, must have an erosion and sedimentation control program approved, and implemented to the maximum extent possible, prior to the start of any land disturbing activity. Trash and debris must be adequately contained at all times. Such measures shall be maintained during the project’s construction period. Violations or other noncompliance with stormwater management measures may result in the project being shut down, including any building permit activity, until full compliance with stormwater management requirements is achieved.

66. Construction Damage: The Developer shall remove and replace any damaged curb, gutter, sidewalks, driveways, signs, pavement, pavement markings, etc. within the public right-of-way along the project frontage and at any locations damaged by the construction of the proposed project. Damaged pavement surfaces shall be overlain or micro-surfaced. Damaged pavement surfaces shall be repaired or resurfaced as required by the City Engineer. Unused driveways or unused portions thereof shall be removed and replaced with curb, gutter and sidewalk matching adjoining in form and color.

Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy

67. All public improvements, including the complete installation of all street improvements, fencing, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, water system, underground utilities, streetlights etc., shall be completed and attested to by the City Engineer before approval of occupancy of any unit in each phase of the subdivision. Where facilities of other agencies are involved, such installation shall be verified as having been completed and accepted by those agencies.

ATTACHMENT III

Page 19 of 26 ends

68. Prior to final inspection and issuance of final certificates of occupancy, all pertinent conditions of approval and all improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director and Development Services Director or his/her designees.

69. Conceptual Multi-Phased Exhibit (Unit Release Plan): Prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy for any unit within the project, an exhibit showing the proposed phased closures/openings during construction. The exhibit shall detail the number and locations of units to be released and portion of public street and sidewalk to be opened/closed to the public at each phase. Exhibits shall also show access routes and include traffic control plans. Proper measures such as fencing, gates, and signs must be in place to separate adjacent construction activities from occupied units. These measures shall be reviewed and approved by the City Inspector prior to installation and occupancy of units.

70. Post Construction Stormwater Maintenance: The property owner(s) shall enter into the City’s standard “Stormwater Treatment Measures Maintenance Agreement” as prepared by the City. The Maintenance Agreement shall be recorded with the Alameda County Recorder’s Office to ensure that the maintenance responsibility for private treatment control and site design measures is bound to the property in perpetuity.

71. Geotechnical Letter: Prior to the issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy, Developer shall submit a confirming letter from the project geologic and/or geotechnical team confirming they have observed all grading activities and that those activities were performed in conformance with their recommendations. All material testing reports shall be attached to the certification letter report.

72. Final Engineer’s Report: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, The Engineer of Record shall submit a confirming letter that all grading, drainage, and engineering components of the project have been performed in conformance with the approved plans and specifications.

73. As-Built Records: As-built records of site grading and improvements completed by the property owner shall be provided to the City Engineer on electronic media in AutoCAD and pdf formats.

UTILITIES
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit

74. All public water mains and appurtenances shall be constructed in accordance with the City’s “Specifications for the Construction of Water Mains and Fire Hydrants,” latest revision at the time of permit approval. Available on the City’s website:
https://www.hayward-ca.gov/your-government/departments/engineeringdivision.

ATTACHMENT III

Page 20 of 26 ends

75. All connections to existing water mains shall be performed by City Water Distribution Personnel at the Applicant/Developer’s expense.

76. Where a public water main is in an unpaved easement, unpaved surface, or under decorative, stamped, or colored concrete (including turf-blocks), the water main shall be constructed of ductile iron. Shut-off valves are required where a water main transitions from a paved area to an unpaved easement.

77. Existing water services, if any, that cannot be reused for the proposed development shall be abandoned by City Water Distribution Personnel at the Applicant/Developer’s expense.

78. Each residential property shall have its own water meter. Combined residential domestic and fire service is permitted per City of Hayward Standard Detail SD-216.

79. A separate irrigation meter shall be installed for landscape purposes.

80. The Applicant/Developer shall install an above ground Reduced Pressure Backflow Prevention Assembly (RPBA) on each non-residential domestic and irrigation water meter, per City Standard Detail SD-202. Backflow prevention assemblies shall be at least the size of the water meter or the water supply line on the property side of the meter, whichever is larger.

81. The fire service size shall be determined by the Fire Department’s requirements. All fire services must have an above-ground double check valve assembly (DCVA), per City Standard Detail 204 (SD-204) and 201 (SD-201). New fire service line must be installed by the City’s Water Distribution personnel at the Applicant/Developer’s expense.

82. A fire flow test must be completed by Water Distribution personnel.  The current cost for a fire flow test is $326. For instructions on obtaining existing fire flow data and filling out an application for new fire flow data, please visit the City’s website at https://www.hayward-ca.gov/services/city-services/fire-flow-testing.

83. Water meters and services are to be located a minimum of two feet from top of driveway flare as per City Standard Detail SD-213 thru SD-218. Water meters shall not be located in the driveway.  Water meter lids shall be Nicor, Inc.

84. Water mains and services, including the meters, must be located at least ten (10) feet horizontally from and one foot vertically above any parallel pipeline conveying untreated sewage (including sanitary sewer laterals), and at least four feet from and one foot vertically above any parallel pipeline conveying storm drainage, per the current California Waterworks Standards, Title 22, Chapter 16, Section 64572. The minimum horizontal separation distances can be reduced by using higher grade (i.e., pressure) piping materials.

ATTACHMENT III

Page 21 of 26 ends

85. All sanitary sewer mains and appurtenances shall be constructed in accordance with the City’s “Specifications for the Construction of Sewer Mains and Appurtenances,” latest revision at the time of permit approval. Available on the City’s website:
https://www.hayward-ca.gov/your-government/departments/engineeringdivision

86. The development’s sanitary sewer mains and manholes shall be public, owned, and maintained by the City. If sewer mains are located in a private roadway, either the entire roadway shall be a public utility easement or a minimum 10-foot-wide easement shall be granted to the City with rights for reasonable access for repairs and maintenance.

87. Each dwelling unit shall have its own sanitary sewer lateral.

88. The Applicant/Developer is responsible for payment of sewer connection fees at the current rates at the time and application for water and sewer service is submitted.

Sewer connection fees for non-residential connections are calculated based on the volume and strength of the wastewater discharge. The development’s permitted sewer capacity and related sewer capacity fees shall be further assessed during the building permit application.

SOLID WASTE

89. The owner or property manager shall be responsible for litter-free maintenance of the property and shall remove any litter on or within 50 feet of the property daily to ensure that the property and its street frontage remain clear of any abandoned debris or trash per Municipal Code Sec.11-5.22.

90. Residents shall not place carts at the curb any earlier than 6:00 a.m. the day before scheduled collection and are required to retrieve them no later than midnight the days the carts are emptied. (Hayward Municipal Code Section 5-1.15).

TRANSPORTATION
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit

91. Applicant shall submit the following items as part of Improvement Plans to Public Works-Transportation for review prior to issuance of Building Permits:
a. An on-site and off-site (fronting City right-of-way) Signing and Striping Plan in accordance with Caltrans’ latest Standard Plans (refer to Caltrans Standard Plans Sheet A90A for more information on marking complaint disabled stalls).

ATTACHMENT III

Page 22 of 26 ends

b. A Photometric Plan, refer to Hayward’s Standard Plans Sheet SD-120 for roadway lighting criteria, link: https://www.haywardca.gov/documents/hayward-standard-detail c. Turning Analysis using the largest vehicle expected on-site (typically a delivery vehicle) using AutoTurn software. Turning Analysis shall not depict vehicles backing into public streets/right-of-way.

92. Applicant shall not modify the existing on-street parking regulations along Manon Avenue unless directed to do so by the Public Works & Utilities Director or his/her designee.

93. Applicant shall not modify the existing speed hump, or any other traffic calming device currently located along Manon Avenue unless directed to do so by the Public Works & Utilities Director or his/her designee.

94. Proposed “Sliding Privacy Gates” shall not be installed within 25 feet of the public sidewalk on Manon Avenue.

95. Upon review of Improvement Plan(s) and required item(s) listed above by Public Works-Transportation, Applicant shall modify Improvement Plan(s) to address any deficiency(ies) or item(s) identified by Public Works-Transportation staff, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director or his/her designee, prior to issuance of Building Permit(s).

FIRE
General

96. Submit appropriate building permits for the construction of all proposed building(s) to the City of Hayward Building Department. Construction shall conform to all standards according to the current edition of the California Building and Fire Code(s) respectively.

Fire Prevention

97. Where the grade plan and highest roof surface exceeds 30ft., fire apparatus roads shall have unobstructed width of 26 feet in the immediate vicinity of buildings (highest roof surface shall be determined by measurement to the eve of a pitched roof). At least one of the required access routes shall be located within a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 30 feet from the building and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building.

98. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support 75,000 pounds, the imposed load of fire apparatus, and shall be surfaced to provide all-

ATTACHMENT III

Page 23 of 26 ends

weather driving capability. An unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches shall be provided for all fire apparatus accesses.

99. A fire apparatus access road 20 feet to 26 feet wide shall be posted on both sides as a fire lane; a fire apparatus access road 26 feet to 32 feet wide shall be posted on one side of the road as a fire lane. “No Parking” signs shall meet the City of Hayward Fire Department fire lane requirements.
100. Address and premise identification approved numbers shall be placed on all buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the road or street fronting the property. Dimensions of address numbers or letters on the front of the buildings shall be approved by the fire department. 101. Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus access road, the minimum road width shall be 26ft. exclusive of shoulders.
102. Electrified gates shall be provided with a Knox product Keyswtich at a location approved by the AHJ.

Water Supply
103. A fire flow shall be provided in accordance with the current edition of the California Fire Code (CFC) Table B105.1 based on the construction type and building area when building exceeding 3,600 square feet. A fire flow reduction of up to 50 percent is allowed when the building is provided with automatic sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13. The resulting fire flow shall not be less than 1,500gpms. (Provide with submittal of building drawings)
104. The minimum number of fire hydrants shall be provided in accordance with the Hayward Fire Code Ordinance and the California Fire Code (CFC). The average spacing between hydrants is 300 feet. Any portion of the building or facility shall be within 400 feet of a fire hydrant. Spacing and locations of fire hydrants shall be subject to review and approval by the Hayward Fire Department. With the determination of existing fire hydrants on Manon Ave., an additional hydrant may be required based on available water supply and water/fire flow demand of the site.

Fire Protection
105. All buildings are required to install an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13/NFPA 13R as reflected on the current proposal. (a

ATTACHMENT III

Page 24 of 26 ends

separate submittal by a licensed C16 Contractor is required to the Hayward Fire Department)
106. A maximum static pressure of 80 PSI should be used when test data indicates higher pressures. Residual pressures used in the calculation should also be adjusted accordingly.
107. Underground fire service lines shall be installed in accordance with NFPA 24 and City of Hayward SD204/216. The underground fire line will be determined based on type of fire sprinkler system proposed.
108. Fire sprinkler monitoring systems should be provided for multi-family residential buildings in accordance with the California Fire Code and NFPA 72. At a minimum, each fire sprinkler system riser shall have exterior local alarm bell(s). Interior notification device(s) shall be installed within each residential unit. 109. An audible alarm bell (device) shall be installed on the exterior of the fire sprinkler system riser. The device shall activate upon any fire sprinkler system water flow activity.
110. Interior audible alarm device(s) shall be installed within each dwelling unit in a location approved by the AHJ. The device shall activate upon any fire sprinkler system water flow activity.
111. Interconnected smoke detectors shall be installed at approved locations based on the California Building (CBC), California Fire (CFC) Code(s) and NFPA 72 Standards.

Hazardous Materials
112. Environmental and Health Based Site Clearance - A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and any other records regarding site contamination, investigation, remediation, or clearances from other regulatory agencies shall be submitted.

Provide clearance documentation from either the California Regional Water Quality Control Board or the Department of Toxic Substance Control to ensure that the property meets residential development investigation and cleanup standards. 113. The Alameda County Department of Environmental Health’s Local Oversight Program (LOP). The LOP contact, Paresh Khatri, can be reached at (510) 567-6700 or (510) 777-2478. Clearance from the LOP will ensure that the proposed residential project meets development investigation and cleanup standards, including, if necessary, any clearance stipulations, such as a deed restriction or the need for any groundwater/soil vapor/soil management plan. LOP clearance shall be submitted to the Hayward Fire Department’s Hazardous Materials Office, the City of Hayward Planning Division and City of Hayward Public Works/Engineering Division prior to issuance of any grading and building permits.

ATTACHMENT III

Page 25 of 26 ends

114. Electronic Submittal of Environmental Documentation – Environmental Documentation associated with the evaluation, investigation and/or clearance of this site shall be provided in an electronic format to the City of Hayward Fire Department and Planning Division prior to the issuance of the Building or Grading Permit.
115. Demolition/Grading – A condition of approval prior to grading: Structures and their contents shall be removed or demolished under permit in an environmentally sensitive manner. Proper evaluation, analysis and disposal of materials shall be done by an appropriate professional(s) to ensure that hazards posed to development construction workers, the environment, future uses, and other persons are mitigated.
116. Wells, Septic Tank Systems or Subsurface Structures – Any wells, septic tank systems and other subsurface structures shall be removed properly to minimize threats to the health and safety of the development construction workers, future residents, or the environment. These structures shall be documented and removed under permit from the appropriate regulatory agency when required. 117. Hazardous Materials/Waste and their Vessels Discovered during Grading/Construction – If hazardous materials/wastes or their containers are discovered during grading/construction, the Hayward Fire Department shall be immediately notified at (510) 583-4910.
118. Underground Storage Tanks, Oil Water Separators, Hydraulics Lifts – If found on the property, underground vessels and/or structures shall be removed under an approved plan filed with the Hayward Fire Department (HFD) and appropriate samples shall be taken under the direction of a qualified consultant to ensure that contamination has not occurred to soil or groundwater. A follow-up report shall be required to be submitted to document the activities performed and any conclusions.

Below are specific requirements on each:
a. Underground storage tank and associate piping: An approved removal plan, including appropriate sampling, a Hayward Fire Department permit for the removal, and follow-up report is required.
b. Oil Water Separators: An approved plan, including appropriate sampling, and follow-up report is required.
c. Hydraulic Lifts: An approved plan, including appropriate sampling, and follow-up report is required.
119. Hazardous Materials/Waste During Construction - During grading and construction hazardous materials and hazardous waste shall be properly stored, managed, and disposed.

ATTACHMENT III

Page 26 of 26 ends

AFFORDABLE HOUSING
120. This development is subject to the requirements of the Affordable Housing Ordinance set forth in Chapter 10, Article 17 of the Hayward Municipal Code. The applicant shall comply with the affordable housing requirements as reflected in the attached final Affordable Housing Plan on file with the Housing Division and included as Attachment X and detailed per Section 10-17.510 Affordable Housing Plan. No building permit(s) will be issued for any non-City restricted units in the Project until permits for all affordable units have been obtained or are obtained simultaneously. No Certificate(s) of Occupancy will be issued for any non-City restricted units in the Project until Certificate(s) of Occupancy for all affordable units have been obtained or are obtained simultaneously. 121. Pursuant to Hayward Municipal Code Sections 10-17.515 and 10-17.525, the applicant shall enter into and record against the property an Affordable Housing Agreement that includes all elements set forth in the Affordable Housing Ordinance and the final Affordable Housing Plan on file with the Housing Division and included as Attachment V to the staff report, prior to the approval of a final map or issuance of the first building permit, whichever occurs first. Additional rental or resale restrictions, deeds of trust, option agreements and/or other documents acceptable to the City Manager or designee shall be recorded.
27865 MANON AVENUE
27865 MANON AVENUE
HAYWARD, CALIFORNIA 94544
APN: 453-90-14
SUBMITTAL DATE: 03.29.2021
RESUBMITTAL: 07.27.2021
RESUBMITTAL: 10.06.2021
RESUBMITTAL: 05.13.2022

VICINITY MAP
SITE

LOCATION
OWNER

SUNFLOWER MANON LLC
467 SARATOGA AVE. SUITE #1450
SAN JOSE, CA 95129
CONTACT: KISHORE PAL
PHONE: 408.627.1334
EMAIL: [email protected]

ARCHITECT

HUNT HALE JONES ARCHITECTS
444 SPEAR STREET, SUITE 105
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105
CONTACT: BOB IWERSEN, ARCHITECT
PHONE: 415.568.3843
EMAIL: [email protected]

CIVIL ENGINEER
PA DESIGN RESOURCES, INC.
3021 CITRUS CIRCLE, SUITE 150
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94598
CONTACT: MARK WOODS
PHONE: 925.210.9300
EMAIL: [email protected]

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT

RIPLEY DESIGN GROUP
1615 BONANZA STREET, SUITE 314
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596
CONTACT: ANNIKA CARPENTER
PHONE: 925.938.7377
EMAIL:[email protected]
PROJECT TEAM:

GENERAL

CS COVER SHEET
G1.0 PHOTOGRAPHIC DISPLAY
G2.0 PROJECT DATA

ARCHITECTURAL
A1.0 SITE PLAN
A1.1 STREETSCAPE
A2.0 BLDG A - GROUND FLOOR PLAN
A2.1 BLDG A - MAIN FLOOR PLAN
A2.2 BLDG A - UPPER FLOOR PLAN
A2.3 BLDG A - ROOF PLAN
A2.4 BLDG A - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A2.5 BLDG C - GROUND FLOOR
PLAN
A2.6 BLDG C - MAIN FLOOR PLAN
A2.7 BLDG C - UPPER FLOOR PLAN
A2.8 BLDG C - ROOF PLAN
A2.9 BLDG C - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A3.0 PLAN 1 - FLOOR PLANS
A3.1 PLAN 2 - 3 INT. - FLOOR PLANS
A3.2 PLAN 2 - 3 END A - FLOOR
PLANS
A3.3 PLAN 2 - 3 END B - FLOOR
PLANS
A3.4 PLAN 2 - 3 END C - FLOOR
PLANS_UNIT 8 ADA
A4.0 MATERIAL BOARD
A5.0 FIRE SAFETY - TRAVEL DISTANCE
A5.1 FIRE SAFETY - LADDER PAD
ACCESS
A5.2 WASTE MANAGEMENT REMOVAL
PLAN

LANDSCAPE
L1 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
L2 PASEO PLAN & BIO EXAMPLES
L3 PRELIMINARY DETAILS
L4 PRELIMINARY DETAILS
L5 PRELIMINARY IRRIGATION PLAN
CIVIL
C1 COVER SHEET
C2 EXISTING CONDITIONS
C3 SITE PLAN
C4 SITE PLAN
C5 GRADING PLAN
C6 GRADING PLAN
C7 UTILITY PLAN
C8 UTILITY PLAN
C9 STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN
SHEET INDEX:

NORTH

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

MANON TOWNHOMES

SUNFLOWER MANON LLC
27865 MANON AVE. HAYWARD, CA 94544
APN: 453-90-14

5.13.2022
359002
SCALE:

COVER SHEET
CS
N.T.S.

Attachment IV

MAP OF SITE LOCATION
27935 MANON AVE. 27843 MANON AVE.
27882 MANON AVE. 27920 MANON AVE. 27940 MANON AVE.
27865 MANON AVE. 1 2 3
4 5 6
1 2
3 4
5 6

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

MANON TOWNHOMES

SUNFLOWER MANON LLC
27865 MANON AVE. HAYWARD, CA 94544
APN: 453-90-14

5.13.2022
359002
SCALE:

PHOTOGRAPHIC DISPLAY
G1.0
N.T.S.

Attachment IV

PROJECT DATA
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 28 MANON AVE. +AYWARD, CA
APN: 43-0090-04-00
GENERAL PLAN: MDR: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
ZONING: RS
LOT AREA: 42,88.8 SQ. FT. 0.98 ACRES

FLOOR AREA RATIO
FAR
: 4,80 SQ.FT. 42,88.8 SQ.FT. = .2
PROPOSED USE: MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
OCCUPANCIES: R2, U
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: VB
FIRE SPRIN.LER SYSTEM: N.F.P.A. 3R
+EIG+T LIMIT: 30
-0 - 40FT.AT RM
33
- 9 PROPOSED

NO. OF STORIES T+REE FOR ALL BUILDING
NUMBER OF BLDGS. 4
GROSS SQ.FT. 4,80 SQ.FT.

NUMBER OF UNITS: 22 UNITS

DENSITY

UNITS PER ACRE
:

20.4 DUA PER TOTAL LOT AREA
PAR.ING
INTERIOR 22 SPACES
ON SITE 9 SPACES
TOTAL
4
PAR.ING SPACES
BUILDING SQ.FT.

BLDG A D TOTAL SQ.FT.

GROUND FLOOR PLAN 4,89 SQ.FT.

MAIN FLOOR PLAN ,22 SQ.FT.

UPPER FLOOR PLAN ,4 SQ.FT.

TOTAL ,4 SQ.FT. [
2 =
30,830 SQ.FT.

BLDG B C
GROUND FLOOR PLAN 2,98 SQ.FT.

MAIN FLOOR PLAN 3,00 SQ.FT.

UPPER FLOOR PLAN 2,93 SQ.FT.

TOTAL 8,83 SQ.FT. ;
2 =
,2 SQ.FT.

TOTAL BUILDING SQ.FT. ON SITE = 48,492 SQ.FT.

UNIT LIVING AREA SQUARE FOOTAGE COUNTS
PROPOSED USES TOTAL SQ.FT.

UNIT TYPE 1 INT /1 ADA (2) x 1,712 SQ.FT. 3,424 SQ.FT.

UNIT TYPE 2 INT (10) x 1,671 SQ.FT. 16,710 SQ.FT.

UNIT TYPE 3 INT (2) x 1,982 SQ.FT. 3,964 SQ.FT.

UNIT TYPE 3 END A (4) x 2,307 SQ.FT. 9,228 SQ.FT.

UNIT TYPE 3 END B (2) X 2,237 SQ.FT. 4,474 SQ.FT.

UNIT TYPE 3 END C INC. ADA (2) x 2,119 SQ.FT. 4,238 SQ.FT.

TOTAL UNIT SQ.FT. 22 UNITS 42,038 SQ.FT.

RS ZONING SUMMARY - REZONE TO RM: PROJECT DATA OVERVIEW:

CATEGORY REQUIRED/ALLOWED PROPOSED COMPLIES

GENERAL RM ZONING
PRIMARY USES PERMITTED SINGLE FAMILY TOWN+OME APARTMENTS 22 TOWN+OME STYLE RENTAL UNITS SEE BELOW

SECONDARY USES ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
LOT REQUIREMENTS 2,00 SQ.FT. UNIT =
42,88.8 SQ FT.UNIT
2,00 = 42,88.8 SQ.FT 22 UNITS.= ,93.9 SQ. FT.UNIT NO - STATE DENSITY

BONUS REQUESTED
MIN.AVG. LOT WIDT+ 0 FT 39
- 0
2 YES
MIN. AVG, LOT DEPT+ 80 FT. 42
-
2 YES
MA;. LOT COVERAGE: 40 = ,0 SQ. FT. ,02 SQ.FT. 42,88.8 SQ.FT. =40 YES

INCLUDING AREA BELOW DEC.S

YARD REQUIREMENTS
MIN. FRONT SETBAC. 20 FT.
- 4 TO BUILDING
- TO PORC+ NO
SIDE SETBAC. 0 FT. 2
- 9 TO DEC. AT 2ND LEVEL YES
REAR SETBAC. 20 FT. 3
-0 TO METER CLOSET,
-0 TO MAIN BLDG. NO
NO
+EIG+T LIMIT: 40 FT. 39
-3 FT. YES
MA;. ACCESSORY BUILDING +T. 4 FT. 2 FT. YES
PROJECTIONS INTO SETBAC.S
FRONT FT. FT. #BUILDING BAY OPEN DEC.S E;CEPTED NO - SEE SETBAC.

SIDE 2 FT. NA YES
REAR FT. BUILDING IS SEE.ING REAR YARD SETBAC. WAIVER NO- SEE SETBAC.

OPEN SPACE

GENERAL
MIN. 30 SQ. FT.UNIT
22 UNITS = ,00 SQ. FT. 8,32 SQ.FT. YES

PRIVATE OPEN SPACE PRIVATE USABLE OPEN SPACE MAY BE DOUBLED TOWARD TOTAL REQ D
AT GRADE 00 SQ. FT. MIN. ! 0 FT. IN ANY DIRECTION . YARDS: 3,4 SQ.FT. ,940 SQ.FT. ; 2 = 3,880 SQ.FT.

ABOVE GRADE 0 SQ. FT. MIN. ! FT, IN ANY DIRECTION DEC.S: 2,8 SQ.FT. ,400 ; 2 = 2,800 SQ. FT.

TOTAL PRIVATE ; 2 ,80 SQ. FT. TOTAL PRIVATE
GROUP OPEN SPACE 400 SQ. FT. MIN. ! 20 FT. IN ANY DIRECTION ,92 SQ. FT. 20 FT. MIN.

TOTAL OPEN SPACE = 8,2 SQ.FT.

PAR.ING
SPACES REQUIRED 2 BEDROOMS =
COVERED . OPEN

2 UNITS
= 4 REQ
D 22 PROVIDED
22 COVERED OPEN
= 3 SPACES YES
AND OR . PER ----

0 UNITS
= REQ
D PROVIDED
VISITOR 0 TOTAL SPACES MAR.ED = 4 ; 0.= SPACES PROVIDED # OPEN PAR.ING YES ACCESSIBLE SPACES 2 FOR
2-0
SPACES 4 TOTAL: 3 WIT+IN UNITS # OPEN PAR.ING YES
LOCATION NO CLOSER T+AN FT. TO ANY BUILDINGPROP. LINE FT. W 2FT. OVER+ANG YES -- 2 OR 2
2 FT OVER+ANG REQUIRES FT OR
2 FT.

DIMENSIONS FT. ; 9 FT. COVERED FT. ; 9 FT.

ALL SINGLE CAR
YES
9FT. ; 9 FT. OPEN PAR.ING
8FT. ; FT. COMPACT OPEN PAR.ING

2FT. OVER+ANG USED # OPEN PAR.ING
EMERGENCY VE+ICLE REQMT. REQ
D W+EN DWELL UNITS MORE T+AN 0 FT. LOT DEPT+ FROM CURB = 3 FT. NOT REQ D YES
SCALE:

PROJECT DATA ZONING REQUIREMENTS
G2.0
N.T.S.

C + U N T + A L E J O N E S A R C + I T E C T S

AUFKLWHFWXUHPODQQLQJIQWHULRUV
444 SSHDU SWUHHW, SXLWH 0
SDQ FUDQFLVFR, CA 940
ZZZ.KXQWKDOHMRQHV.FRP
W. 4-2-300
I. 4-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

MANON TOWN+OMES

SUNFLOWER MANON LLC
28 MANON AVE. +AYWARD, CA 9444
APN: 43-90-4
.3.2022
39002
Attachment IV

UP UP BASE
T.P. T.P. 30x24 CLR UP UP
T.P. T.P. UP UP BASE
T.P. T.P. 30x24 CLR UP UP
T.P. T.P. UP UP
T.P. T.P. UP BASE
30x24 CLR
T.P. 30x24 CLR UP UP 30x24 CLR T.P. T.P. UP UP BASE
T.P. T.P. UP UP
T.P. T.P. UP BASE
30x24 CLR
T.P. 30x24 CLR UP UP 30x24 CLR T.P. T.P. UP UP BASE
T.P. T.P.
319'-10
1 2
" 142'-6
1 2
"
11'-0" 42'-6"
10'-0"

SETBACK
30'-0" 42'-6" 47'-11" 42'-6" 30'-0" 42'-6" 11'-0" 10'-0" SETBACK 20'-0" SETBACK 172'-6
1 2
" 30'-0"
S29° 09' 00"E
319.86'
N29° 09' 00"W 319.86' S60° 44' 00"W 167.54' N60° 44' 00"E 167.54' 100'-3 1 2
" 20'-0" LEGISLATED SETBACK
5'-0" 20'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 20'-0"
0 5
10 15
20 25
50 NORTH 26'-0" DRIVE AISLE DRIVE AISLE

SITE DATA
TOTAL BUILDINGS: 4
TOTAL UNITS: 22
TOTAL PARKING: 47 2'-10" 13'-0"
PASEO ?
COMMON

OPEN SPACE
1,952 SQ. FT.

UNIT 1
PLAN 3 END A
BLDG A
BLDG C
BLDG D

SITE PLAN
1'-0" 10'-0" 19'-0"
9'-0" 15'-0"8'-0"
10'-0" 1'-0"
23'-0" 8'-0" 11'-4
1 2
"

DRIVE AISLE
46'-0" 5'-2
1 2
" 13'-0" 2'-0"
4'-2"
2'-0"
42'-6" 16'-41
4 " 17'-0" 2'-0"
16'-0" 27'-0" 8'-0" 27'-0" 8'-0" 9'-0" 9'-0" 8'-0" 27'-0" 21'-6 3 4
" 42'-6"
2'-0"
4'-2" 5'-1
1 2 4'-6 " 1
4 "
319'-10
1 2
"
2' OVERHANG
11'-3
1 2 192'-10 52'-6"
" 3
4 10'-8 52'-6"
" 1
4 "
10'-0" 10'-0"
BLDG B

FIRE & LANDSCAPE

BACKFLOW

LOCATION
30'-0" 30'-0"
UNIT 2
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 3
PLAN 1 INT
UNIT 4
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 5
PLAN 3 INT
UNIT 6
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 7
PLAN 3 END C
UNIT 22
PLAN 3 END A
UNIT 21
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 20
PLAN 1 INT
UNIT 19
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 18
PLAN 3 INT
UNIT 17
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 16
PLAN 3 END C
UNIT 11
PLAN 3 END B
UNIT 10
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 9
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 8
PLAN 3 END C
UNIT 12
PLAN 3 END B
UNIT 13
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 14
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 15
PLAN 3 END C
20' SLIDING

PRIVACY GATE

DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY
26'-0"

CLEAR TO SKY
26'-0"
CLEAR TO SKY 5'-2
1 2
"
20'-0"
T.P.

SPRINKLER
RISER (TYP.)
20' SLIDING
PRIVACY GATE 153'-0" FROM STREET CURB

MANON AVENUE

ADJACENT

RESIDENTIAL

RS ZONING

ADJACENT

COMMERCIAL

CN ZONING

MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL

RM ZONING

ACROSS STREET
30'-10 46'-0" 1
2 10'-0"
" 10'-0"
16'-0"
NO

PARKING

SIDE BY SIDE

PEDESTAL

MAIL BOXES
9 VAN
1 c 2c 3 4
5 v 6 7 8 10
11 v 12 13
14 c 15c
16 17 18 19
12'-0"
1'-10
3 4
"
28'-0" 68'-6"10'-0" 11'-0"
6'-0"
MIN. 2 FT.

CLEAR @ PULL
SIDE TYP.

MIN. 2 FT.

CLEAR @ PULL
SIDE TYP.

PROPERTY

MANAGERS
OFFICE 6'-11" 11'-4
1 2
" 6'-11" 6'-5"
2 TYP.
2 TYP.

SCALE:

SITE PLAN
A1.0
1/16" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

MANON TOWNHOMES

SUNFLOWER MANON LLC
27865 MANON AVE. HAYWARD, CA 94544
APN: 453-90-14

5.13.2022
359002
Attachment IV

MANON STREETSCAPE
SCALE:

STREETSCAPE
A1.1
3/32" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

MANON TOWNHOMES

SUNFLOWER MANON LLC
27865 MANON AVE. HAYWARD, CA 94544
APN: 453-90-14

5.13.2022
359002
Attachment IV
UP UP T.P.

T.P.

UP
BASE T.P.

UP UP
T.P.

T.P.
30x24 CLR
UP UP
BASE 30803080
5050 SL* 5050 SL* 30x24 CLRT.P.
2468
3080
8070 SECT ROLL-UP 8070 SECT ROLL-UP
5050 SL
2668 2668
T.P. 5050 SL
2040 SH

GROUND FLOOR PLAN
BUILDING A (BUILDING D REVERSED) GROUND FLOOR PATIO SPACE = (4 UNITS)(110 SQ. FT.) + (1 UNIT)(155 SQ. FT.) = 595 SQ. FT X (2) BLDGS = 1,190 SQ. FT. SQ.FT.: 4869 SQ. FT. 46'-6" 2'-0" 11'-8 1 2
" 2'-0"
115'-4" 6'-0"

BUILDING A (D REVERSED) RESIDENTIAL MULTI-STORY TOWNHOME STYLE CONDOMINIUMS PLAN 3 END B
UNIT 7 & (16)
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 6 & (17)
PLAN 3 INT
UNIT 5 & (18)
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 4 & (19)
PLAN 1 INT
UNIT 3 & (20)
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 2 & (21)
PLAN 3 END A
UNIT 1 & (22) 15'-5
1 4
" 15'-4
1 4
" 46'-6" 2'-0" 5'-3" 2'-0" 6'-0" 21'-5" 15'-10"
4'-5
1 2
"
PATIO
110 SQ. FT. 10'-0"
11'-0"
PATIO
80 SQ. FT.

NOT PART

OF OPEN
SPACE
PATIO
110 SQ. FT.

PATIO
110 SQ. FT.

PATIO
155 SQ. FT.

PATIO
80 SQ. FT.

NOT PART

OF OPEN
8'-0" SPACE 10'-0"
11'-0" 10'-0"11'-0" 10'-0"11'-0" 10'-0"
14'-4
1 2
"
BD. 4
BD. 5
BD. 4 BD. 4
BD. 5

FLEX FLEX
BD. 5
BD. 4 FLEX
2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2 2
2 SCALE:

BLDG. A (D REVERSED) - GROUND FLOOR PLAN
A2.0
1/4" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

MANON TOWNHOMES

SUNFLOWER MANON LLC
27865 MANON AVE. HAYWARD, CA 94544
APN: 453-90-14

5.13.2022
359002
Attachment IV
DN
16 TREADS @ 10.5"
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5" UP
DN
16 TREADS @ 10.5"
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5" UP
T.P.

T.H.

T.R.

T.P.

T.H.

T.R.

DN
16 TREADS @ 10.5"
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5" UP
DN
16 TREADS @ 10.5"
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5" UP
T.P.

T.H.

T.R.

T.P.

T.H.

T.R.

DN
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5"
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5"UP
T.P.

T.H.

T.R.

BASE BASE
DN
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5"
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5"UP
DN
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5"
2668
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5" UP
4068 BRN DR
T.P.

T.H.

T.R. 2468
2668
4068 BRN DR
T.P.

T.H.

T.R. 2468 2040 SH TEMP. 2040 SH 1050 XOX DBL SL
3050 SH 3050 SH*
3020 SL TEMP. 3020 SL TEMP.
3050 SH* 3050 SH
2650 SH 2650 SH 30688068 SL DR 5050 SL TEMP.

MAIN FLOOR PLAN
BUILDING A (BUILDING D REVERSED) SQ.FT.: 5272 SQ. FT. 46'-6" 112'-1
1 2
" 6'-0"

BUILDING A (D REVERSED) RESIDENTIAL MULTI-STORY TOWNHOME STYLE CONDOMINIUMS PLAN 3 END B
UNIT 7 & (16)
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 6 & (17)
PLAN 3 INT
UNIT 5 & (18)
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 4 & (19)
PLAN 1 INT
UNIT 3 & (20)
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 2 & (21)
PLAN 3 END A
UNIT 1 & (22) 18'-5
1 2
" 2'-0" 46'-6" 6'-0" 18'-10" 13'-5" 12'-3" 2'-0"
7'-8"
BD. 3
BD. 3 BD. 3 BD. 3 BD. 3 BD. 3 BD. 3
2 2 2 2
2 2 2 11'-3" 14'-9
1 2
"
SCALE:

BLDG. A (D REVERSED) - MAIN FLOOR PLAN
A2.1
1/4" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

MANON TOWNHOMES

SUNFLOWER MANON LLC
27865 MANON AVE. HAYWARD, CA 94544
APN: 453-90-14

5.13.2022
359002
Attachment IV
UP T.R. T.H. T.P. T.P.

UP T.R. T.H. T.P.UP T.R. T.H. T.P. T.P. T.P.

BASE BASE 2668
UP
2468
2468T.R. T.H. T.P. 2468
2668
BASE 2668
UP
2468
2468 T.R. T.H. T.P. 30x24 CLR T.P.
2668 2468
2668 30x24 CLR T.P.
2668
3050 SH 3050 SH* 5050 SL* 3050 SH 3050 SH
8050 XOX* DBL SL TEMP. 5050 SL TEMP.

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
BUILDING A (BUILDING D REVERSED) SQ.FT.: 5,174 SQ. FT. 46'-6" 112'-1
1 2
"

BUILDING A (D REVERSED) RESIDENTIAL MULTI-STORY TOWNHOME STYLE CONDOMINIUMS PLAN 3 END B
UNIT 7 & (16)
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 6 & (17)
PLAN 3 INT
UNIT 5 & (18)
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 4 & (19)
PLAN 1 INT
UNIT 3 & (20)
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 2 & (21)
PLAN 3 END A
UNIT 1 & (22) 2'-0" 11'-8
1 2
" 18'-5
1 2
" 46'-6" 9'-2" 25'-10" 11'-6"
BD. 2
BD. 1
BD. 2 BD. 2 BD. 2 BD. 2
BD. 2 BD. 2
BD. 1 BD. 1 BD. 1 BD. 1 BD. 1 BD. 1
2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2 2 14'-4"
SCALE:

BLDG. A (D REVERSED) - UPPER FLOOR PLAN
A2.2
1/4" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

MANON TOWNHOMES

SUNFLOWER MANON LLC
27865 MANON AVE. HAYWARD, CA 94544
APN: 453-90-14

5.13.2022
359002
Attachment IV

FLAT ROOF

SLOPE TO BE
1/4"/FT. MIN.

ROOF PLAN

BUILDING A (BUILDING D REVERSED)

LOWER
ROOF

LOWER ROOF

TYPICAL CONDENSER
LOCATION ON RAISED PAD.

SCUPPER LEADER AND
DOWNSPOUT TYP.

TYPICAL ROOF VENT.

SOLAR READY FOR (7) PANELS

TYPICAL ACCESS
PANEL
SCALE:

BLDG. A ROOF PLAN
A2.3
1/4" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

MANON TOWNHOMES

SUNFLOWER MANON LLC
27865 MANON AVE. HAYWARD, CA 94544
APN: 453-90-14

5.13.2022
359002
Attachment IV
9'-0
1 4
" 9'-0
1 4
" 9'-0
1 4
"
SECOND FLR. PLATE
FIRST FLR. PLATE
THIRD FLR. SUBFLR.

SECOND FLR. SUBFLR.

THIRD FLR. PLATE

SIDE A ELEVATION
BUILDING A SHOWN - UNITS 1-7 (BUILDING D REVERSED)
F F

BUILDING A (D REVERSED) RESIDENTIAL

MULTI-STORY TOWNHOME STYLE CONDOMINIUMS
PLAN 3 END C
UNIT 7 & (16)
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 6 & (17)
PLAN 3 INT
UNIT 5 & (18)
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 4 & (19)
PLAN 1 INT
UNIT 3 & (20)
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 2 & (21)
PLAN 3 END A
UNIT 1 & (22)
ROOF LINE @ FRONT
SLOPE FROM REAR ±39'-0" MAX. HEIGHT TYPICAL
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
11 10
FRONT ELEVATION_A1
BUILDING C SHOWN - UNIT 12 (BUILDING B REVERSED) 9'-0
1 4
" 9'-0
1 4
" 9'-0
1 4
"
SECOND FLR. PLATE
FIRST FLR. PLATE
THIRD FLR. SUBFLR.

SECOND FLR. SUBFLR.

EL --
THIRD FLR. PLATE 34'-3"
ROOF LINE @ HIGH PT.

BUILDING C (B REVERSED) RESIDENTIAL

MULTI-STORY TOWNHOME STYLE CONDOMINIUMS
PLAN 3 END B
UNIT 12 & (11)

LOW POINT OF

TOP OF ROOF
DECK ±39'-0" MAX. HEIGHT TYPICAL SIDE PROPERTY LINE WHERE OCCURS B A
1 5
4 2
6 7
9 14 12
F
F
F 9'-0
1 4
" 9'-0
1 4
" 9'-0
1 4
"
SECOND FLR. PLATE
FIRST FLR. PLATE
THIRD FLR. SUBFLR.

SECOND FLR. SUBFLR.

EL --
THIRD FLR. PLATE

REAR ELEVATION
BUILDING A SHOWN - UNIT 7 (BUILDING D REVERSED) 9'-0
1 4
" 9'-0
1 4
" 9'-0
1 4
"
SECOND FLR. PLATE
FIRST FLR. PLATE
THIRD FLR. SUBFLR.

SECOND FLR. SUBFLR.

EL --
THIRD FLR. PLATE

DRIVE ASILE ELEVATION
BUILDING A SHOWN - UNITS 1-7 (BUILDING D REVERSED)

BUILDING A (D REVERSED) RESIDENTIAL

MULTI-STORY TOWNHOME STYLE CONDOMINIUMS
PLAN 3 END C
UNIT 7 & (16)

BUILDING A (D REVERSED) RESIDENTIAL

LOW POINT POINT OF

TOP OF ROOF DECK
-SLOPE FROM REAR
ROOF LINE @ REAR
HIGH POINT 33'-6
1 2
"
ROOF LINE @ REAR
HIGH POINT ±39'-0" MAX. HEIGHT TYPICAL ±39'-0" MAX. HEIGHT TYPICAL SIDE PROPERTY LINE WHERE OCCURS A B 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
13 8

ELEVATION NOTES

MATERIALS

1. PARAPET ROOF

2. STUCCO

3. BOARD & BATTEN

4. HORIZONTAL SIDING

5. VERTICAL SIDING

6. WOOD RAILING

7. WOOD TRIM

8. GARAGE DOOR

9. VINYL WINDOWS

10. FRENCH DOOR

11. SLIDING DOOR

12. ENTRY DOOR

13. METAL DOOR W/ HOLLOW METAL FRAME

14. CONTROL JOINTS
SCALE:

BUILDING A (BLDG. D REVERSED) - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A2.4
1/4" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

MANON TOWNHOMES

SUNFLOWER MANON LLC
27865 MANON AVE. HAYWARD, CA 94544
APN: 453-90-14

5.13.2022
359002
Attachment IV
UP UP T.P.

T.P.
30x24 CLR
UP UP 3080 3080 2040 SH 2040 SH 5050 SL*
PR 2668
5050 SL*
2040 SH 8070 SECT ROLL-UP 8070 SECT ROLL-UP
5050 SL* T.P.
21068
6068 BI-PASS
21068 21068
PR 2668
2668 2668
T.P.

GROUND FLOOR PLAN

BUILDING C (BUILDING B REVERSED)
GROUND FLOOR PATIO SPACE = (2 UNITS)(110 SQ. FT.) + (1 UNIT)(155 SQ. FT.) = 375 SQ. FT X (2) BLDGS = 750 SQ. FT.

SQ.FT.:2798 SQ. FT. 46'-6" 2'-0" 15'-10" 2'-0"
72'-5" 6'-0"

BUILDING C (B REVERSED) RESIDENTIAL MULTI-STORY TOWNHOME STYLE CONDOMINIUMS PLAN 3 END C
UNIT 15 & (8)
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 14 & (9)
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 13 & (10)
PLAN 3 END A
UNIT 12 & (11) 14'-11
1 2
" 11'-8
1 2
" 46'-6" 2'-0" 11'-0" 2'-0" 6'-0" 22'-0" 9'-4"
PATIO
110 SQ. FT. 10'-0"
11'-0"
PATIO
80 SQ. FT.

NOT PART

OF OPEN
SPACE
PATIO
155 SQ. FT.
8'-0" 8'-0"
14'-4
1 2
"
PATIO
110 SQ. FT. 10'-0"
11'-0"
4'-5
1 2
"
BD. 4 FLEX FLEX BD. 4
BD. 5
2 2 2 2
2 SCALE:

BLDG. B (C REVERSED) - GROUND FLOOR PLAN
A2.5
1/4" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

MANON TOWNHOMES

SUNFLOWER MANON LLC
27865 MANON AVE. HAYWARD, CA 94544
APN: 453-90-14

5.13.2022
359002
Attachment IV
DN
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5"
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5"UP
DN
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5"
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5" UP
T.P.

T.H.

T.R.

T.P.

T.H.

T.R.

BASE BASE
DN
16 TREADS @ 10.5"
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5" UP
DN
16 TREADS @ 10.5"
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
2668
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5" UP
4068 BRN DR
T.P.

T.H.

T.R. 2468
2668
4068 BRN DR
T.P.

T.H.

T.R. 2468 2040 SH TEMP. 2040 SH 1050 XOX DBL SL
3050 SH* 3050 SH
3020 SL TEMP. 3020 SL TEMP.
3050 SH 3050 SH*
8068 SL DR 2040 SH 2040 SH6068 SL DR

MAIN FLOOR PLAN
BUILDING C (BUILDING B REVERSED) SQ.FT.: 3070 SQ. FT. 46'-6" 71'-5" 6'-0"

BUILDING C (B REVERSED) RESIDENTIAL MULTI-STORY TOWNHOME STYLE CONDOMINIUMS PLAN 3 END C
UNIT 15 & (8)
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 14 & (9)
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 13 & (10)
PLAN 3 END A
UNIT 12 & (11) 2'-0" 11'-3" 14'-9
1 2
" 18'-5
1 2
" 46'-6" 6'-0" 2'-0" 9'-8" 23'-2" 11'-8"
BD. 3 BD. 3 BD. 3 BD. 3
2 2 2 2
SCALE:

BLDG. B (C REVERSED) - MAIN FLOOR PLAN
A2.6
1/4" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

MANON TOWNHOMES

SUNFLOWER MANON LLC
27865 MANON AVE. HAYWARD, CA 94544
APN: 453-90-14

5.13.2022
359002
Attachment IV
UP T.R. T.H. T.P.

UP T.R. T.H. T.P. T.P. T.P.UP T.R. T.H. T.P.UP T.R. T.H. T.P. T.P. T.P.

UPPER FLOOR PLAN
BUILDING C (BUILDING B REVERSED) SQ.FT.: 2963 SQ. FT. 46'-6" 65'-1
1 2
"

BUILDING C (B REVERSED) RESIDENTIAL MULTI-STORY TOWNHOME STYLE CONDOMINIUMS PLAN 3 END C
UNIT 15 & (8)
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 14 & (9)
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 13 & (10)
PLAN 3 END A
UNIT 12 & (11) 2'-0" 11'-8
1 2
" 14'-4" 18'-5
1 2
" 46'-6" 9'-8" 25'-4" 11'-6"
BD. 1
BD. 2
BD. 1 BD. 1 BD. 1
BD. 2 BD. 2 BD. 2
2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2
SCALE:

BLDG. B (C REVERSED) - UPPER FLOOR PLAN
A2.7
1/4" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

MANON TOWNHOMES

SUNFLOWER MANON LLC
27865 MANON AVE. HAYWARD, CA 94544
APN: 453-90-14

5.13.2022
359002
Attachment IV

ROOF PLAN

BUILDING C (BUILDING B REVERSED)

BUILDING C (B REVERSED) RESIDENTIAL MULTI-STORY TOWNHOME STYLE CONDOMINIUMS PLAN 3 END C
UNIT 15 & (8)
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 14 & (9)
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 13 & (10)
PLAN 3 END A
UNIT 12 & (11)
SOLAR READY FOR (4) PANELS

TYPICAL WALL COPING

LOWER ROOF

TYPICAL ACCESS
PANEL

FLAT ROOF

SLOPE TO BE
1/4"/FT. MIN.

TYPICAL CONDENSER
LOCATION ON RAISED PAD.

TYPICAL ROOF VENT.

SCALE:

BLDG. C ROOF PLAN
A2.8
1/4" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

MANON TOWNHOMES

SUNFLOWER MANON LLC
27865 MANON AVE. HAYWARD, CA 94544
APN: 453-90-14

5.13.2022
359002
Attachment IV
9'-0
1 4
" 9'-0
1 4
" 9'-0
1 4
"
SECOND FLR. PLATE
FIRST FLR. PLATE
THIRD FLR. SUBFLR.

SECOND FLR. SUBFLR.

EL --
THIRD FLR. PLATE

SIDE A ELEVATION
BUILDING C SHOWN - UNITS 12 - 15 ( BUILDING B REVERED)
F F

BUILDING C (B REVERSED) RESIDENTIAL

MULTI-STORY TOWNHOME STYLE CONDOMINIUMS
PLAN 3 END C
UNIT 15 & (8)
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 14 & (9)
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 13 & (10)
PLAN 3 END B
UNIT 12 & (11) 34'-3"
ROOF LINE @ FRONT
SLOPE TO REAR ±39'-0" MAX. HEIGHT TYPICAL SIDE
1 2 3 4 5
3 11 10

LOW POINT OF

TOP OF ROOF
DECK
FRONT ELEVATION_B1
BUILDING C SHOWN - UNIT 12 (BUILDING B REVERSED) 9'-0
1 4
" 9'-0
1 4
" 9'-0
1 4
"
SECOND FLR. PLATE
FIRST FLR. PLATE
THIRD FLR. SUBFLR.

SECOND FLR. SUBFLR.

EL --
THIRD FLR. PLATE 34'-3"
ROOF LINE @ HIGH PT.

BUILDING C (B REVERSED) RESIDENTIAL

MULTI-STORY TOWNHOME STYLE CONDOMINIUMS
PLAN 3 END B
UNIT 12 & (11)

LOW POINT OF

TOP OF ROOF
DECK ±39'-0" MAX. HEIGHT TYPICAL SIDE PROPERTY LINE WHERE OCCURS B A
1 5
4 2
6 7
9 14 12
F
F
F
F

ELEVATION NOTES

MATERIALS

1. PARAPET ROOF

2. STUCCO

3. BOARD & BATTEN

4. HORIZONTAL SIDING

5. VERTICAL SIDING

6. WOOD RAILING

7. WOOD TRIM

8. GARAGE DOOR

9. VINYL WINDOWS

10. FRENCH DOOR

11. SLIDING DOOR

12. ENTRY DOOR

13. METAL DOOR W/ HOLLOW METAL FRAME

14. CONTROL JOINTS 9'-0
1 4
" 9'-0
1 4
" 9'-0
1 4
"
SECOND FLR. PLATE
FIRST FLR. PLATE
THIRD FLR. SUBFLR.

SECOND FLR. SUBFLR.

EL --
THIRD FLR. PLATE

REAR ELEVATION
BUILDING C SHOWN - UNIT 15 (BUILDING B REVERSED) 9'-0
1 4
" 9'-0
1 4
" 9'-0
1 4
"
SECOND FLR. PLATE
FIRST FLR. PLATE
THIRD FLR. SUBFLR.

SECOND FLR. SUBFLR.

EL --
THIRD FLR. PLATE

DRIVE ASILE ELEVATION
BUILDING C SHOWN - UNITS 12 - 15 (BUILDING B REVERSED)

BUILDING C (B REVERSED) RESIDENTIAL

MULTI-STORY TOWNHOME STYLE CONDOMINIUMS
PLAN 3 END C
UNIT 15 & (8)
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 14 & (9)
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 13 & (10)
PLAN 3 END B
UNIT 12 & (11)

BUILDING C (B REVERSED) RESIDENTIAL

MULTI-STORY TOWNHOME STYLE CONDOMINIUMS
PLAN 3 END C
UNIT 15 & (8)
F 33'-6
1 2
"

HIGH POINT POINT OF

TOP OF ROOF DECK
-SLOPE TO REAR
ROOF LINE @ REAR
LOW POINT 33'-6
1 2
"
ROOF LINE @ REAR
LOW POINT ±39'-0" MAX. HEIGHT TYPICAL ±39'-0" MAX. HEIGHT TYPICAL A B 5 4 3 2 1
13 8
SCALE:

BUILDING C (BLDG. B REVERSED) - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
A2.9
1/8" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

MANON TOWNHOMES

SUNFLOWER MANON LLC
27865 MANON AVE. HAYWARD, CA 94544
APN: 453-90-14

5.13.2022
359002
Attachment IV
DN
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5"
7068 SL DR
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5" UP
2668
5068 BRN DR
T.P.

T.H.

T.R. 2468
5050 SL*
3020 SL TEMP.

BASE BASE 2668
UP
2668
2468
2468T.R. T.H. T.P. 2468
2668 T.P.
2668 2468
5050 SL*
5050 SL* TEMP.

UP
2868
4268 BI-PASS
BASE 3080 2868 T.P.
2868
5050 SL*
8070 SECT ROLL-UP
ACCESSIBLE @
UNITS 3 & 20
BIKE @ NON

ACCESSIBLE
UNIT

GROUND FLOOR
PLAN 1 INT
GROUND LIVING: 282 SQ. FT.

GARAGE: 370 SQ. FT.

TOTAL LIVING: 1712 SQ. FT.

MAIN FLOOR
PLAN 1 INT
MAIN LIVING: 715 SQ. FT.

DECK: 61 SQ. FT.

UPPER FLOOR
PLAN 1 INT
UPPER LIVING: 715 SQ. FT.
15'-7" 52'-6"15'-7" 54'-0"15'-7" 52'-6" 6'-0" 42'-6" 2'-0" 4'-0" 40'-6" 52'-6" 6'-0" ENTRY
GARAGE
DIN.

LIV.

KIT.

BTH. 1
BD. 1
BTH. 2
BD. 2
BTH. 3
BD. 3
4'-9" 8'-2"
12'-11" 1'-0" 45'-6" 1'-0" 45'-6" 2'-0"
BD. 4
BTH. 4 7'-6"
5'-8
1 9'-11" 2"
DECK DECK ABV.
5'-8
1 5'-8 9'-11" 2"1 9'-11" 2" 1'-0" 1'-0"
OPT.

W.I.C. 7'-6" 19'-0" 3'-0"
9'-2
1 5'-9 2"1
2"
SCALE:

UNIT 1 FLOOR PLANS
A3.0
1/4" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

MANON TOWNHOMES

SUNFLOWER MANON LLC
27865 MANON AVE. HAYWARD, CA 94544
APN: 453-90-14

5.13.2022
359002
Attachment IV
BASE
UP
2668
UP
BASE 30803080 2468
2668
5050 SL*
8070 SECT ROLL-UP 8070 SECT ROLL-UP 2040 SH
5050 SL* 2668 2868 2868
5068
BASE BASE 2668
UP
2668
2468
2468T.R. T.H. T.P. 2468
2668
BASE 2468 2668
UP
2468
2468 T.R. T.H. T.P. T.P.
2668
2668 2468
2668 T.P.
2668 2468
8050 XOX* DBL SL TEMP. 5050 SL* TEMP.
3050 SH 3050 SH* 5050 SL*

GROUND FLOOR
GROUND LIVING: 400 SQ. FT.

GARAGE: 336 SQ. FT.

TOTAL LIVING: 1830 SQ. FT.

PLAN 2 INT PLAN 3 INT
GROUND LIVING: 242 SQ. FT.

GARAGE: 330 SQ. FT.

TOTAL LIVING: 1671 SQ. FT.

MAIN FLOOR
PLAN 2 INT PLAN 3 INT
MAIN LIVING: 715 SQ. FT.

DECK: 55 SQ. FT.

UPPER FLOOR
PLAN 2 INT PLAN 3 INT
UPPER LIVING: 715 SQ. FT. UPPER LIVING: 715 SQ. FT.

BTH. 2
BD. 2
11'-7" 19'-7"
31'-3"
15'-7" 15'-7"
31'-3" 46'-6" 2'-0" 42'-6"44'-6"
15'-7" 15'-7"
31'-3" 46'-6"
4'-7" 11'-0"
15'-7"
31'-3"
11'-0" 4'-7"
15'-7"
5'-10" 9'-9" 5'-10" 9'-9" 9'-9" 5'-10"

BASE BASE
DN
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5"
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5" UP
DN
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5"
2668
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5" UP
4068 BRN DR
T.P.

T.H.

T.R. 2468
3050 SH 3050 SH*
2668
4068 BRN DR
T.P.

T.H.

T.R. 2468
3020 SL TEMP.
2650 SH 2650 SH 3068
3020 SL TEMP.
3050 SH* 3050 SH
2650 SH 2650 SH 3068 46'-6" 6'-0" 1'-0"

GARAGE GARAGE

ENTRY ENTRY
KIT. KIT.

BD. 3
DIN. DIN.

LIV. LIV.

DECK DECK
FLEX
BTH. 4
MAIN LIVING: 715 SQ. FT.

DECK: 55 SQ. FT.

W.I.C.
9'-9" 5'-10"
BTH. 1
BD. 1
BTH. 2
BD. 2
W.I.C.

F.A.U. F.A.U.

BTH. 1
BD. 1
DECK ABV. DECK ABV. 6'-0" 1'-0"
BD. 3
BTH. 3 BTH. 3
OPT. OPT.

BTH. 4
LNDY.

F.A.U.

BD. 4
11'-0"

PARKING WIDTH
11'-0"

PARKING WIDTH
DECK BELOW DECK BELOW 2'-0"
11'-4" 11'-4" 19'-0"
5'-7" 2'-8
1 2"
SCALE:

UNITS 2-3 INT FLOOR PLAN
A3.1
1/4" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

MANON TOWNHOMES

SUNFLOWER MANON LLC
27865 MANON AVE. HAYWARD, CA 94544
APN: 453-90-14

5.13.2022
359002
Attachment IV
UP UP
BASE 30803080
5050 SL* 5050 SL* T.P.
2468
3080
8070 SECT ROLL-UP 8070 SECT ROLL-UP
5050 SL
2668 2668
T.P. 5050 SL
2040 SH

BASE BASE
DN
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5"
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5" UP
DN
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5"
2668
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5" UP
4068 BRN DR
T.P.

T.H.

T.R. 2468
2668
4068 BRN DR
T.P.

T.H.

T.R. 2468 2040 SH TEMP. 2040 SH 1050 XOX DBL SL
3050 SH 3050 SH*
3020 SL TEMP. 3020 SL TEMP.
3050 SH* 3050 SH
2650 SH 2650 SH 30688068 SL DR 5050 SL TEMP.

BASE 2668
UP
2468
2468T.R. T.H. T.P. 2468
2668 2668
UP
2468
2468 T.R. T.H. T.P. T.P.
2668 2468
2668 T.P.
2668
3050 SH 3050 SH* 5050 SL* 3050 SH 3050 SH
8050 XOX* DBL SL TEMP. 5050 SL TEMP.

GROUND FLOOR
GROUND LIVING: 554 SQ. FT.

GARAGE: 295 SQ. FT.

TOTAL LIVING: 2260 SQ. FT. ELEV. A
2314 SQ. FT. ELEV B
PLAN 2 INT PLAN 3 END A
GROUND LIVING: 244 SQ. FT.

GARAGE: 320 SQ. FT.

TOTAL LIVING: 1674 SQ. FT.

MAIN FLOOR
PLAN 2 INT PLAN 3 END A
MAIN LIVING: 715 SQ. FT.

DECK: 55 SQ. FT.

UPPER FLOOR
PLAN 2 INT PLAN 3 END A
UPPER LIVING: 715 SQ. FT. UPPER LIVING ELEV A1: 780 SQ. FT.

BTH. 2
BD. 2
22'-11
1 11'-7" 2" 34'-7
1 2" 15'-7" 23'-5"39'-1" 46'-6" 2'-0" 2'-0" 46'-6"
15'-7" 15'-9"
31'-5" 46'-6"
4'-9" 14'-2
1 2" 18'-11
1 2" 34'-7
1 2"
10'-10" 4'-9"
15'-7"
5'-10" 9'-9" 5'-10" 9'-9" 9'-9" 6'-0" 18'-5
1 2" 6'-0" 1'-0"

GARAGE GARAGE

ENTRY ENTRY
KIT. KIT.

BD. 3
DIN. DIN.

LIV. LIV.

DECK DECK
FLEX
BTH. 4
MAIN LIVING: 872 SQ. FT.

DECK: 55 SQ. FT.
9'-9" 6'-0"
BTH. 1
BD. 1
BTH. 2
BD. 2
F.A.U. F.A.U.

BTH. 1
BD. 1
DECK ABV. DECK ABV. 6'-0" 1'-0"
BD. 3
BTH. 3 BTH. 3
OPT. OPT.

BD. 4
BD. 5
F.A.U. BTH. 4 11'-3" 16'-0" 15'-3"
ENTRY 2'-0" 11'-3" 14'-9
1 2"
34'-7
1 2" 3'-4
1 15'-7" 15'-7" 2"
3'-2" 4'-6"
PORCH 18'-5
1 2" 11'-8
1 2" 14'-4" 2'-0"

DECK BELOW DECK BELOW
11'-0"

PARKING WIDTH
11'-0"

PARKING WIDTH
11'-0" 11'-0" 19'-0"
ROOF
ELEV. A
FLEX
ELEV. B
LINE OF EXT.

WALL AT ELEV. B1

INTERIOR SPACE
AT ELEV. B1
UPPER LIVING ELEV B1: 834 SQ. FT.

SCALE:

UNITS 2-3 END A FLOOR PLAN
A3.2
1/4" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

MANON TOWNHOMES

SUNFLOWER MANON LLC
27865 MANON AVE. HAYWARD, CA 94544
APN: 453-90-14

5.13.2022
359002
Attachment IV
UP UP 3080 3080
6068 BI-PASS 2040 SH
T.P.
2468
PR 2668
2668
PR 2668
PR 2668 3068 BI-PASS
5050 SL*
8070 SECT ROLL-UP 8070 SECT ROLL-UP 2040 SH
5050 SL*
2668 2668
T.P. 2868 5050 SL*
BASE BASE 2668
UP
2468
2468T.R. T.H. T.P. 2468 2668
BASE 2468 2668
UP
2468
2468 T.R. T.H. T.P. T.P.
2668 2468
2668 T.P.
2668 2468 3050 SH 3050 SH 3050 SH 2040 SH
8050 XOX* DBL SL TEMP. 5050 SL
3050 SH 3050 SH* 5050 SL* 7068 BI-PASS
2040 SH 2040 SH

BASE BASE
DN
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5"
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5" UP
DN
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5"
2668
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5" UP
4068 BRN DR
T.P.

T.H.

T.R. 2468
2668
4068 BRN DR
T.P.

T.H.

T.R. 2468 2040 SH TEMP. 1050 XOX DBL SL
3050 SH 3050 SH*
3020 SL TEMP.
3050 SH* 3050 SH
8068 SL DR 2040 SH 2040 SH7068 SL DR
3020 SL TEMP. 2040 SH

GROUND FLOOR
GROUND LIVING: 594 SQ. FT.

GARAGE: 303 SQ. FT.

TOTAL LIVING: 2139 SQ. FT.

PLAN 2 INT PLAN 3 END B
GROUND LIVING: 219 SQ. FT.

GARAGE: 352 SQ. FT.

TOTAL LIVING: 1648 SQ. FT.

MAIN FLOOR
PLAN 2 INT PLAN 3 END B
MAIN LIVING: 715 SQ. FT.

DECK: 51 SQ. FT.

UPPER FLOOR
PLAN 2 INT PLAN 3 END B
UPPER LIVING: 715 SQ. FT. UPPER LIVING: 742 SQ. FT.

BTH. 2
21'-11
1 11'-7" 2" 33'-7
1 2" 15'-7" 15'-9"31'-5" 46'-6" 2'-0" 15'-10" 46'-6"
15'-7" 15'-9"
31'-5" 46'-6"
4'-7" 13'-4
1 2" 17'-11
1 2" 33'-7
1 2"
11'-0" 4'-7"
15'-7"
5'-10" 9'-9" 5'-10" 9'-9" 9'-9" 6'-0" 12'-3
1 4" 6'-0" 1'-0"

GARAGE GARAGE

ENTRY ENTRY
KIT. KIT.

DIN. DIN.

LIV. LIV.

DECK DECK
FLEX BD. 4
BD. 5
BTH. 4
LNDY.

BTH. 4
MAIN LIVING: 803 SQ. FT.

DECK: 55 SQ. FT.
9'-9" 6'-0"
BTH. 1
BD. 1
BTH. 2
BD. 2
W.I.C.

F.A.U. F.A.U.

BTH. 1
BD. 1
DECK ABV. DECK ABV. 6'-0" 1'-0"
BD. 2
W.I.C.

OPT. OPT.

BD. 3 BD. 3
BTH. 3 BTH. 3 21'-4
34" 5'-3
1 4" 2'-0"
F.A.U. 13'-4" 18'-11" 9'-8" 25'-4" 11'-6" 2'-0"
DECK BELOW DECK BELOW 19'-0"
11'-0" 11'-0" 19'-0"
11'-0"

PARKING WIDTH
11'-0"

PARKING WIDTH
SCALE:

UNITS 2-3 END B - FLOOR PLAN
A3.3
1/4" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

MANON TOWNHOMES

SUNFLOWER MANON LLC
27865 MANON AVE. HAYWARD, CA 94544
APN: 453-90-14

5.13.2022
359002
Attachment IV
30x24 CLR
UP UP 3080 3080 2040 SH 2040 SH 5050 SL*
PR 2668
5050 SL*
8070 SECT ROLL-UP 8070 SECT ROLL-UP 2040 SH
5050 SL* T.P.
21068
6068 BI-PASS
21068 21068
PR 2668
2668 2668
T.P.

BASE BASE 2668
UP
2468
2468T.R. T.H. T.P. 2468 2668
BASE 2468 2668
UP
2468
2468 T.R. T.H. T.P. T.P.
2668 2468
2668 T.P.
2668 2468 3050 SH 3050 SH 3050 SH 2040 SH
8050 XOX* DBL SL TEMP. 5050 SL
3050 SH 3050 SH* 5050 SL* 7068 BI-PASS
2040 SH 2040 SH

GROUND FLOOR
GROUND LIVING: 338 SQ. FT.

GARAGE: 453 SQ. FT.

TOTAL LIVING: 1839 SQ. FT.

PLAN 2 INT PLAN 3 END C - UNIT 8 - ACCESSIBLE
GROUND LIVING: 240 SQ. FT.

GARAGE: 324 SQ. FT.

TOTAL LIVING: 1670 SQ. FT.

MAIN FLOOR
PLAN 2 INT PLAN 3 END C
MAIN LIVING: 715 SQ. FT.

DECK: 48 SQ. FT.

UPPER FLOOR
PLAN 2 INT PLAN 3 END C
UPPER LIVING: 715 SQ. FT. UPPER LIVING: 743 SQ. FT.

BTH. 2
11'-7" 21'-7"
33'-3"
15'-7" 15'-9"
31'-5" 46'-6" 2'-0" 11'-2" 46'-6"
15'-7" 15'-9"
31'-5" 46'-6"
5'-1
1 2" 12'-5
1 2" 17'-7"
33'-3"
11'-0" 4'-7"
15'-7"
5'-10" 9'-9" 5'-10" 9'-9" 9'-9" 6'-0" 12'-3
1 4" 6'-0" 1'-0"

GARAGE GARAGE

ENTRY ENTRY
KIT. KIT.

DIN. DIN.

LIV. LIV.

DECK DECK
FLEX
BD. 4
BTH. 4
BTH. 4
MAIN LIVING: 759 SQ. FT.

DECK: 65 SQ. FT.
9'-9" 6'-0"
BTH. 1
BD. 1
BTH. 2
BD. 2
W.I.C.

F.A.U. F.A.U.

BTH. 1
BD. 1
DECK ABV. DECK ABV. 6'-0" 1'-0"
BD. 2
W.I.C.

OPT. OPT.

BD. 3 BD. 3
BTH. 3 BTH. 3 22'-0" 9'-4" 2'-0" 13'-4" 18'-11" 9'-2" 25'-10" 11'-6" 2'-0"

DECK BELOW DECK BELOW
11'-0" 7'-7
1 2" 9'-6" 19'-0" 19'-0"

BASE BASE
DN
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5"
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5" UP
DN
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5"
2668
17 RISERS @ 7.25"
16 TREADS @ 10.5" UP
4068 BRN DR
T.P.

T.H.

T.R. 2468
2668
4068 BRN DR
T.P.

T.H.

T.R. 2468 2040 SH TEMP. 2040 SH 1050 XOX DBL SL
3050 SH 3050 SH*
3020 SL TEMP. 3020 SL TEMP.
3050 SH* 3050 SH
8068 SL DR 2040 SH 2040 SH6068 SL DR
17'-1
1 2" PARKING WIDTH
11'-0"

PARKING WIDTH
SCALE:

UNITS 2-3 END C FLOOR PLAN
A3.4
1/4" = 1'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

MANON TOWNHOMES

SUNFLOWER MANON LLC
27865 MANON AVE. HAYWARD, CA 94544
APN: 453-90-14

5.13.2022
359002
Attachment IV
27865 MANON AVE.

BLDG. A SHOWN

RAILING & TRIM
ITEM / MAT: METAL (PAINTED)
CO: T.B.D.

COLOR: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
ANONYMOUS SW 7046
ROOF
ITEM / MAT: TPO - COOL ROOF
CO: FIRESTONE OR E.Q.

COLOR: WHITE

HORIZONTAL SIDING
ITEM / MAT: 7.25" SELECT CEDARMILL PLANK
CO: JAMES HARDIE
COLOR: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
WORLDLY GRAY SW 7043

VERTICAL SIDING
ITEM / MAT: 7.25" SELECT CEDARMILL PLANK
CO: JAMES HARDIE
COLOR: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
INTELLECTUAL GRAY - SW 7045

RESIDENTIAL WINDOWS & DECK DOORS
ITEM /MAT: VINYL
CO: MILGARD
COLOR: TWEED

COPING & FASCIA
ITEM /MAT: 24 GA. STEEL
CO: PETERSEN ALUMINUM
COLOR: BURNISHED SLATE

ENTRY DOOR
ITEM / MAT: 8' RESIDENTIAL ENTRY DOOR
CLASSIC CRAFTSMEN W/ 3 LITE
CO: THERMA TRU
COLOR: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
MAREA BAJA SW 9185
BODY 2
ITEM / MAT: 3 COAT STUCCO SYSTEM

LIGHT DASH
CO: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR: INCREDIBLE WHITE - SW 7028
BODY 1
ITEM / MAT: 3 COAT STUCCO SYSTEM

LIGHT DASH
CO: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR: REALISTIC BEIGE - SW 6078
BODY 1
ITEM / MAT: 3 COAT STUCCO SYSTEM

LIGHT DASH
CO: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
COLOR: REALISTIC BEIGE - SW 6078

PLATE LINE CONTROL JOINT (SHOWN)
ITEM: #15 SOLID LEG CONTROL JOINT
CO: CEMCO
COLOR: STEEL

HORIZONTAL WINDOW LINE & WINDOW HEATHER
ITEM: #15 DOUBLE "V" CONTROL JOINT
CO: CEMCO
COLOR: PAINT TO MATCH WALL
CONTROL JOINT FOR VERTICAL CONT. WALLS
ITEM: #XJ-15 DOUBLE J CONTROL JOINT
CO: CEMCO
COLOR: STEEL

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

MANON TOWNHOMES

SUNFLOWER MANON LLC
27865 MANON AVE. HAYWARD, CA 94544
APN: 453-90-14

5.13.2022
359002
SCALE:

MATERIAL BOARD
A4.0
N.T.S.

Attachment IV
UP UP
T.P. T.P. 30x24 CLR UP UP
T.P. T.P. UP UP
T.P. T.P. 30x24 CLR UP UP
T.P. T.P. BASE UP UP BASE
T.P. T.P. UP
T.P. UP UP T.P. T.P. UP UP
T.P. T.P. BASE UP UP BASE
T.P. T.P. UP
T.P. UP UP T.P. T.P. UP UP
T.P. T.P.

S29° 09' 00"E
319.86'
N29° 09' 00"W 319.86' S60° 44' 00"W 167.54' N60° 44' 00"E 167.54' UNIT 1
PLAN 3 END A
BLDG A
BLDG C
BLDG D
BLDG B
UNIT 2
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 3
PLAN 1 INT
UNIT 4
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 5
PLAN 3 INT
UNIT 6
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 7
PLAN 3 END C
UNIT 22
PLAN 3 END A
UNIT 21
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 20
PLAN 1 INT
UNIT 19
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 18
PLAN 3 INT
UNIT 17
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 16
PLAN 3 END C
UNIT 11
PLAN 3 END B
UNIT 10
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 9
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 8
PLAN 3 END C
UNIT 12
PLAN 3 END B
UNIT 13
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 14
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 15
PLAN 3 END C
T.P.

PARKING
9 1
c 2c 3 4
5 v 6 7 8 10
11 v 12 13
14 c 15c
16 17 18 19
12'-0"
2 2
FIRE SAFETY - TRAVEL DISTANCES 175' FIRE ACCESS 134' FIRE ACCESS 134' FIRE ACCESS LINE OF PARKING 15'-0" - 30'-0" MAX. TO FACE OF BUILDING 175' FIRE ACCESS 8'-0" 26'-0" UNOBSTRUCTED
& CLEAR TO SKY
26'-0" UNOBSTRUCTED
& CLEAR TO SKY 28'-6
3 4
"
2 2
2 2 134' FIRE ACCESS 175' FIRE ACCESS 175' FIRE ACCESS
R28'-0"
R48'-0" 20'-0"
140'-0" 85'-0"
26'-0"

FIRE APPERATUS HAMMERHEAD
28'-0" 20'-0" 26'-0"
130' FIRE ACCESS 130' FIRE ACCESS

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

MANON TOWNHOMES

SUNFLOWER MANON LLC
27865 MANON AVE. HAYWARD, CA 94544
APN: 453-90-14

5.13.2022
359002
SCALE:

FIRE SAFETY - TRAVEL DISTANCES
A5.0
NTS
Attachment IV

FIRE SAFETY - LADDER PAD ACCESS

LADDER PAD
BASE 40 FT. MAX 40 FT. MAX
3'-0" 3'-0"
75°
4'-3" 40 FT. MAX
3'-0" 3'-0"
75° 7'-2"
GARAGE

BEDROOM

BEDROOM
GARAGE

BEDROOM

BEDROOM
SECOND FLOOR WINDOW ACCESS @

REAR OF BUILDINGS
THIRD FLOOR WINDOW ACCESS @

REAR OF BUILDINGS

THIRD FLOOR WINDOW ACCESS VIA
THE DECK @ FRONT OF BUILDINGS
ENTRY
LIVING RM.

BEDROOM
75°
4'-3"
7'-2"
4'-3"
7'-2"
4'-3"
7'-2"
4'-3"
7'-2"
7'-2"
7'-2"
4'-3" CENTERLINE FOR 2ND FLOOR
LADDER PAD @ REAR OF UNITS
7'-2" CENTERLINE FOR 3RD FLOOR
LADDER PAD @ REAR OF UNITS
BEDROOMS AT BOTH 2ND AND 3RD
FLOORS
7'-2" CENTERLINE FOR
3RD FLOOR LADDER PAD
@ FRONT OF UNITS -3RD

FLOOR BEDROOMS
ONLY
7'-2" CENTERLINE FOR LADDER PAD
ACCESS 3RD FLOOR. BEDROOMS AT
3RD FLOOR ONLY AT FRONT
N29° 09' 00"W 319.86' S60° 44' 00"W 167.54' N60° 44' 00"E 167.54' T.P. 12'-0" BASE UP
T.R.

T.H.

T.P. 30x24 CLR
T.P. UP
T.R.

T.H.

T.P. UP
T.R.

T.H.

T.P.
30x24 CLR
T.P.
30x24 CLR
T.P. UP
T.R.

T.H.

T.P. UP
T.R.

T.H.

T.P.
30x24 CLR
T.P.
30x24 CLR
T.P. BASE BASE
2668 UP
2468 2468
T.R.

T.H.

T.P. 2468
2668 BASE
2668 UP
2468
T.R. 2468
T.H.

T.P.
30x24 CLR
T.P. 2668
2468
2668
30x24 CLR
T.P.
2668 3050 SH* 5050 SL* 3050 SH
3050 SH 3050 SH 8050 XOX* DBL SL TEMP.
5050 SL TEMP. BASE UP
T.R.

T.H.

T.P. 30x24 CLR
T.P. UP
T.R.

T.H.

T.P. UP
T.R.

T.H.

T.P.
30x24 CLR
T.P.
30x24 CLR
T.P. UP
T.R.

T.H.

T.P. UP
T.R.

T.H.

T.P.
30x24 CLR
T.P.
30x24 CLR
T.P. BASE BASE
2668 UP
2468 2468
T.R.

T.H.

T.P. 2468
2668 BASE
2668 UP
2468 2468
T.R.

T.H.

T.P.
30x24 CLR
T.P. 2668
2468
2668
30x24 CLR
T.P.
2668 3050 SH* 5050 SL* 3050 SH
3050 SH 3050 SH 8050 XOX* DBL SL TEMP.
5050 SL TEMP. UP
T.R.

T.H.

T.P. UP
T.R.

T.H.

T.P.
30x24 CLR
T.P.
30x24 CLR
T.P. BASE BASE UP
T.R.

T.H.

T.P. UP
T.R.

T.H.

T.P.
30x24 CLR
T.P.
30x24 CLR
T.P. UP
T.R.

T.H.

T.P. UP
T.R.

T.H.

T.P.
30x24 CLR
T.P.
30x24 CLR
T.P. BASE BASE UP
T.R.

T.H.

T.P. UP
T.R.

T.H.

T.P.
30x24 CLR
T.P.
30x24 CLR
T.P.
3'-0" 3'-0"7'-2" 3'-0"
6'-0"
3'-0" 3'-0" 7'-2" 7'-2" 7'-2" 7'-2" 7'-2" 7'-2"
7'-2" 7'-2"
7'-2"
7'-2" CENTERLINE FOR LADDER PAD
ACCESS 3RD FLOOR. BEDROOMS AT
3RD FLOOR ONLY AT FRONT 7'-2"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

MANON TOWNHOMES

SUNFLOWER MANON LLC
27865 MANON AVE. HAYWARD, CA 94544
APN: 453-90-14

5.13.2022
359002
SCALE:

FIRE SAFETY - LADDER PAD ACCESS
A5.1
NTS
Attachment IV
UP UP
T.P. T.P. UP UP
T.P. T.P. UP UP
T.P. T.P. UP UP
T.P. T.P. UP UP
T.P. T.P. UP
T.P. UP UP T.P. T.P. UP UP
T.P. T.P. UP UP
T.P. T.P. UP
T.P. UP UP T.P. T.P. UP UP
T.P. T.P. UNIT 1
PLAN 3 END A
BLDG A
BLDG C
BLDG D
BLDG B
UNIT 2
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 3
PLAN 1 INT
UNIT 4
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 5
PLAN 3 INT
UNIT 6
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 7
PLAN 3 END C
UNIT 22
PLAN 3 END A
UNIT 21
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 20
PLAN 1 INT
UNIT 19
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 18
PLAN 3 INT
UNIT 17
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 16
PLAN 3 END C
UNIT 11
PLAN 3 END B
UNIT 10
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 9
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 8
PLAN 3 END C
UNIT 12
PLAN 3 END B
UNIT 13
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 14
PLAN 2 INT
UNIT 15
PLAN 3 END C
T.P.

PARKING
9 1
c 2c 3 4
5 v 6 7 8 10
11 v 12 13
14 c 15c
16 17 18 19
12'-0"
2 2
0FT 10FT 20FT

TURNING RADIUS FOR TRUCKS
1/16" = 1'-0"

WASTE MANAGEMENT - REMOVAL PLAN

MANON AVENUE
R30'-7
3 4
" MSL R29'-24
1 " ASL
R30'-74
3 " MSL
R29'-21
4 " ASL

LAYOUT FOR RESIDENTIAL TRASH
*SEE UNIT PLANS FOR TRASH LAYOUT AND LOCATION
STANDARD CARTS PROVIDED IN EACH UNIT:
(1) 32 GALLON CART FOR GARBAGE
(1) 64 GALLON CART FOR RECYCLING
(1) 64 GALLON CART FOR ORGANIC 3'-0"
9'-0" 6'-0"
3'-0"
CONFIGURATION #1 CONFIGURATION #2 3'-0"
3'-0"

C H U N T H A L E J O N E S A R C H I T E C T S
ArchitecturePlanningInteriors
444 Spear Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94105
www.hunthalejones.com
t. 415-512-1300
f. 415-288-0288
DATE:

PROJECT:

MANON TOWNHOMES

SUNFLOWER MANON LLC
27865 MANON AVE. HAYWARD, CA 94544
APN: 453-90-14

5.13.2022
359002
SCALE:

WASTE MANAGEMENT - REMOVAL PLAN
A5.2
NTS
Attachment IV
Attachment IV
Attachment IV
Attachment IV
Attachment IV
Attachment IV
Attachment IV
Attachment IV
Attachment IV
Attachment IV
Attachment IV
Attachment IV
Attachment IV
Attachment IV
C9OF 9 27865 MANON AVENUE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CITY OF HAYWARD, CALIFORNIA STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN DATED: MAY 12, 2022 P:\Drawings\202012-10 Manon Ave. Hayward\T-Map Sheet 9 SWCP.dwg, 5/12/2022 1:18:12 PM, station h, AutoCAD PDF (High Quality Print).pc3 Attachment IV
AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLAN for MANON TOWNHOMES
PLANNING APPLICLICATION NO. 202101491
AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLAN for MANON TOWNHOMES
PLANNING APPLICLICATION NO. 202101491
Project information
Project Developer/Owner Sunflower Manon LLC.

Project Address 27865 Manon Ave.

Hayward, California 94544
Assessor’s Parcel Number(s) 453‐0090‐014‐00
Gross Project Site Area 0.98 Acre(s)
Maximum Density 2,500 sq. ft./unit = 17 units
Project Residential Type Apartments with individual entrance Townhome design/style
Project Tenure Type Rental
Total Units (if applicable, include
Density Bonus)
22 units
Target Population Large Families
Density Bonus Yes – See below section ‘State Density Bonus Compliance Calculation – Rental Project’
Phasing Plan NA
Project Amenities
The project is solely residential with common and private open space meeting the size requirements of zoning.

Affordable Housing Compliance
The Developer is providing on‐site deed‐restricted rental Affordable Units to comply with the City’s Affordable Housing Ordinance (AHO) and State Density Bonus Law (DB). The project will be providing a total of 2 Affordable Units.

Per the AHO, the Developer is required to deed‐restrict a minimum of 6% of units which equates to 1.02 Affordable Units for this project. The Developer has elected to round up to the next whole number and provide an additional unit which results in the project providing a total of 2 Affordable Units restricted under the AHO and in perpetuity. These units will be made available to very low‐income households whose income does not exceed the income limits for Alameda County published annually by the California Department of Housing and Community (HCD).

In conjunction with the project’s planning entitlement application, the Developer is applying for a 30% increase in density and for concessions and waivers related to development standards with the intent to develop a total of 22 rental units. The Affordable Units restricted under the AHO will overlap and be counted towards the affordability requirements for the DB. As per the DB, the Developer will be deed‐restrict 10% of units, a total of 2 units, to very low‐income households whose income does not exceed the income limits published annually by HCD.

The tables below provide details of the project’s compliance method for both the AHO and DB:

Attachment V

Page 1 of 3 ends

Hayward City CouncilOctober 11, 2022

Hayward City Council
October 11, 2022