CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JUNE 27, 2023
PRESENTATIONS
ITEM# 23
WS 23-00
Community Survey Results
Hayward Voter Views of a
Measure C Extension
Key Findings of a Survey of Hayward Voters
Conducted May 30-June 5, 2023
220-6794
2 Dates May 30-June 5, 2023
Survey Type Dual-mode Voter Survey
Research Population Likely November 2024 Voters
Total Interviews 630
Margin of Sampling Error (Full Sample) ±4.0% at the 95% Confidence Level (Half Sample) ±5.7% at the 95% Confidence Level
Contact Methods
Data Collection Modes
Survey Tracking Selected Comparisons to 2008-2021 Resident Surveys Languages English and Spanish
(Note: Not All Results Will Sum to 100% Due to Rounding) Text
Invitations
Telephone
Calls
Email
Invitations
Telephone
Interviews
Online
Interviews
Survey Methodology
3 Issue Context
4 Q1.
Right
Direction
43%
Wrong
Track
35%
Don't
Know
22%
Hayward voters are divided on
the direction of the city.
Do you feel that things in Hayward are generally going in the right direction or do you feel things have gotten pretty seriously off on the wrong track? Liberals, voters under 30 are more likely
to be optimistic; conservatives and older
voters are more pessimistic.
5 Q4. ^Not Part of Split Sample
46%
39%
39%
37%
37%
29%
26%
31%
29%
27%
28%
27%
28%
28%
15%
24%
22%
24%
22%
29%
28%
6%
7%
8%
9%
12%
13%
16%
Homelessness
^The cost of living
The cost of housing
Crime, in general
Traffic congestion on local freeways
Potholes and street maintenance
Traffic congestion on local streets
and roads
Ext. Ser. Prob. Very Ser. Prob. Smwt. Ser. Prob. Not Too Ser. Prob. Don't Know Ext./Very Ser. Prob.
78%
68%
66%
65%
64%
57%
54%
I am going to read you a list of issues that some people say might be problems in Hayward.
Please tell me whether you think it is an extremely serious problem, a very serious problem, a somewhat serious problem, or not too serious a problem in the city.
Homelessness is rated the most-urgent problem,
followed by cost of living, crime and traffic.
6 Q4. I am going to read you a list of issues that some people say might be problems in Hayward. Please tell me whether you think it is an extremely serious problem, a very serious problem, a somewhat serious problem, or not too serious a problem in the city. ^Not Part of Split Sample 25%
24%
20%
20%
17%
16%
10%
22%
22%
20%
19%
23%
19%
11%
30%
30%
27%
28%
26%
29%
27%
21%
18%
20%
14%
24%
20%
49%
6%
13%
19%
11%
16%
Litter and graffiti
Too many vacant properties
and storefronts
Inefficiency in local government
Waste in City government
^The amount people pay in local taxes
Jobs and unemployment
A lack of parks and recreation options
Ext. Ser. Prob. Very Ser. Prob. Smwt. Ser. Prob. Not Too Ser. Prob. Don't Know Ext./Very Ser. Prob.
47%
46%
40%
39%
39%
35%
21%
Relatively few are intensely concerned about taxes,
the economy, or a lack of recreation options.
7 Compared with prior surveys of residents,
homelessness is an increasing concern.
Q4. I am going to read you a list of issues that some people say might be problems in Hayward. Please tell me whether you think it is an extremely serious problem, a very serious problem, a somewhat serious problem, or not too serious a problem in the city. ^Not Part of Split Sample *Resident Survey Issue *2019 *2021 2023 Difference
Homelessness 60% 70% 78% +8%
Crime, in general 49% 58% 65% +7%
Too many vacant properties and storefronts 35% 40% 46% +6% Potholes and street maintenance 50% 52% 57% +5%
The cost of housing 60% 65% 66% +1%
Waste in City government 25% 38% 39% +1%
Litter and graffiti 33% 48% 47% -1%
Traffic congestion on local freeways 76% 70% 64% -6%
Traffic congestion on local streets and roads 57% 60% 54% -6% Inefficiency in local government 30% 47% 40% -7%
A lack of parks and recreation options 24% 31% 21% -10% Jobs and unemployment 28% 46% 35% -11%
^The amount people pay in local taxes 40% 54% 39% -15%
Extremely/Very Serious Problem
8 Q6.
17%
45%
23%
14%
1%
Very satisfied
Somewhat satisfied
Somewhat dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know
Total
Satisfied
62%
Total
Dissatisfied
37%
I’d like to get your overall opinion of living in the city of Hayward. Generally speaking, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the overall quality of life in Hayward? Three in five voters are satisfied
with quality of life in the city overall.
9 Q6. I’d like to get your overall opinion of living in the City of Hayward. Generally speaking, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the overall quality of life in Hayward? *Resident Survey
17%
24%
25%
27%
49%
42%
37%
30%
45%
43%
50%
49%
37%
38%
42%
46%
23%
18%
15%
16%
9%
12%
11%
16%
14%
12%
7%
7%
5%
8%
10%
7%
2023
*2021
*2019
*2016
*2014
*2012
*2010
*2008
Very Sat. Smwt. Sat. Don't Know Smwt. Dissat. Very Dissat. Total Sat.
Total
Dissat.
62% 37%
68% 31%
75% 22%
76% 24%
85% 14%
80% 20%
79% 21%
76% 23%
While the majority is satisfied, this figure
is as low as it has been in 15 years.
10 Q7.
9%
44%
21%
16%
9%
Very satisfied
Somewhat satisfied
Somewhat dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Don't know
Total
Satisfied
53%
Total
Dissatisfied
38%
Overall, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the job the City of Hayward is doing to provide resident services?
A majority is satisfied with City services,
though without much intensity.
11 Q7. Overall, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the job the City of Hayward is doing to provide resident services? *Resident Survey 9%
21%
18%
19%
35%
33%
28%
26%
44%
35%
43%
43%
42%
37%
45%
45%
9%
10%
19%
10%
6%
8%
6%
9%
21%
20%
13%
17%
10%
15%
12%
10%
16%
14%
7%
11%
7%
7%
9%
6%
2023
*2021
*2019
*2016
*2014
*2012
*2010
*2008
Very Sat. Smwt. Sat. Don't Know Smwt. Dissat. Very Dissat. Total Sat.
Total
Dissat.
53% 38%
56% 34%
60% 21%
62% 28%
77% 17%
70% 22%
73% 21%
71% 16%
This share is also lower than in prior years.
12 Q5 Split A & Split B.
32%
39%
8%
12%
10%
Great need
Some need
A little need
No real need
Don’t know
Maintain Improve
Great/
Some Need
71%
A Little/No
Real Need
19%
Seven in ten or more say the City has a “great”
or “some need” for funding to maintain or
improve services and facilities.
39%
36%
9%
9%
7%
Great/
Some Need
75%
A Little/No
Real Need
18%
In general, would you say that the City of Hayward has a great need for funding, some need, a little need, or no real need for additional funding to (SPLIT SAMPLE A ONLY:
maintain) (SPLIT SAMPLE B ONLY: improve) essential City services and facilities? 13 Views of a
Measure C Extension
14 Voters heard or read the potential ballot
language of a Measure C extension.
Q2. Would you vote “yes” or “no”?
Shall a City of Hayward measure to continue an existing half-cent sales tax for (HALF SAMPLE: 30 years) (HALF
SAMPLE: 20 years) to maintain, restore and construct
essential City services and facilities, including for
firefighting, emergency-medical response, police
protection and general maintenance; to repair potholes
and improve streets; and to update and replace public
works and South Hayward library/
community center facilities, providing $20,000,000 that cannot be taken by the State, with audits and
community oversight, be adopted?
15 Q2 Split A & Split B. Would you vote “yes” or “no”?
48%
27%
3%
0%
5%
13%
5%
42%
23%
3%
2%
8%
18%
4%
Total
Yes
68%
Total
No
28%
30 Years 20 Years
Definitely yes
Probably yes
Undecided, lean yes
Undecided, lean no
Probably no
Definitely no
Undecided
Total
Yes
78%
Total
No
17%
A measure to extend Measure C has support
from more than two-thirds of Hayward voters.
16 43%
47%
45%
40%
49%
38%
53%
25%
25%
39%
29%
27%
20%
14%
5%
5%
9%
6%
7%
8%
9%
7%
19%
12%
5%
17%
13%
22%
18%
Men
Women
18-29
30-39
40-49
50-64
65+
Def. Yes Prob. Yes Und., Lean Yes Undecided Und., Lean No Prob. No Def. No Total Yes
Total
No
70% 25%
76% 20%
89% 9%
72% 25%
79% 18%
59% 32%
71% 26%
Support for a measure is very
broad across gender and age.
Q2 Total. Would you vote “yes” or “no”?
Combined Results by Gender & Age
17 50%
46%
41%
44%
51%
43%
21%
28%
36%
27%
24%
29%
5%
7%
7%
5%
7%
8%
6%
15%
12%
9%
17%
11%
19%
White Voters
Latino Voters
African American Voters
Asian/Pacific Islander Voters
<$110,000
$110,000+
Def. Yes Prob. Yes Und., Lean Yes Undecided Und., Lean No Prob. No Def. No Total Yes
Total
No
74% 22%
78% 19%
77% 16%
73% 26%
80% 18%
73% 22%
Support is also substantial across race,
ethnicity and income.
Q2 Total. Would you vote “yes” or “no”?
Combined Results by Race/Ethnicity & Household Income
18 52%
33%
36%
51%
43%
37%
25%
30%
14%
30%
22%
19%
5%
5%
6%
6%
6%
6%
8%
8%
5%
6%
9%
10%
22%
31%
10%
17%
25%
Democrats
Independents
Republicans
Liberal
Moderate
Conservative
Def. Yes Prob. Yes Und., Lean Yes Undecided Und., Lean No Prob. No Def. No Total Yes
Total
No
80% 16%
65% 30%
54% 40%
84% 14%
70% 24%
59% 35%
Four in five Democrats, two-thirds of independents,
and a majority of Republicans back the measure.
Q2 Total. Would you vote “yes” or “no”?
Combined Results by Party & Ideology
19 62%
42%
21%
34%
49%
39%
52%
38%
24%
31%
16%
23%
29%
18%
29%
20%
5%
5% 12%
5%
7%
12%
13%
11%
5%
9%
6%
11%
46%
13%
10%
25%
9%
24%
Great Need for Funding
Some Need
A Little/No Real Need
Don't Know
Satisfied with Quality of Life
Dissatisfied
Satisfied with City Services
Dissatisfied
Def. Yes Prob. Yes Und., Lean Yes Undecided Und., Lean No Prob. No Def. No Even those dissatisfied with City services and
quality of life broadly support the measure.
Q2 Total. Would you vote “yes” or “no”?
Combined Results by Need for Funding, Quality of Life & City Service Satisfaction Total
Yes
Total
No
88% 8%
78% 19%
38% 57%
61% 27%
81% 15%
59% 36%
83% 15%
61% 34%
20 Dissatisfied with City Services,
“Yes” on a Measure
23%
One-quarter of voters are dissatisfied with City
services – and support a measure to better-fund them.
These voters are disproportionately:
▪ Household incomes under $60K
▪ Moderate and conservative
Democrats
▪ Voters under 30
▪ Non-college educated women
▪ Renters
▪ Democrats under 50
21 Q3a.
Voters who support the measure largely said they
want to continue to improve the city.
In a few words of your own, why would you vote YES on this ballot measure? 24%
16%
15%
14%
13%
10%
9%
7%
5%
3%
10%
2%
1%
Continue to improve the city
Road repair/fix potholes
Continue to support essential services
Improve infrastructure
The City has many needs (general)
Improve safety/support police
Already paying, and it's a reasonable amount
Support fire/emergency services and fire prevention
Improves libraries
Yes if accountability/oversight is included
Other
Don't know/Unsure
Refused/No comment
(Open-ended; Asked of Yes Voters Only, n=445)
22 We've already
been paying it.
OK to continue.
I mean, it’s only a half-cent and I
feel its important to fix things like
the library and potholes.
We like to think that the
money just falls from
the sky and we can just
maintain things. But it
costs to maintain things.
We absolutely need our roads
maintained in Hayward. I’d like
to see a prioritized list of roads
that would be repaired and a
timeline to do so if the tax is
approved.
Verbatim Responses from Supporters
Q3a. In a few words of your own, why would you vote YES on this ballot measure? If Hayward is to continue to revive, our
infrastructure is vital. Money spent on public
safety and public services will be the key to
quality of life and hence growth in the city.
Right now there is so
much disparity in
different
neighborhoods.
We desperately need
infrastructure repairs!
Hayward needs
to continue with
improvement to
be a place
people want to
live safely.
I’d prefer things
not get worse.
I value those services and the
price seems small.
23 In a few words of your own, why would you vote NO on this ballot measure? Opponents are anti-tax in principle or don’t trust
government to spend money properly.
Q3b.
40%
33%
15%
12%
6%
3%
3%
1%
5%
1%
Oppose raising taxes
Distrust government
Wrong priorities for the measure
Too expensive/Hurts the poor
General oppose
Oppose more police funding
Need more information
20 or 30 years is too long
Other
Refused/No comment
(Open-ended; Asked of No Voters Only, n=139)
24 Alameda County
and Hayward
have outrageous
taxes! Stop.
We already paying 10.75% sales tax
which is already high. Please try to
eliminate homelessness, help school
kids, please no woke agenda.
The current ballot measure isn't providing
much of pothole maintenance or any other
services I'm aware of. The city is in critical
disrepair and generally going to the weeds.
Our police and fire stations are pretty
new and the money could go
somewhere else. We have a new
library, and it is good condition. Roads
are better than other urban cities.
Money should go to fighting small
crimes and retail businesses.
Verbatim Responses from Opponents
Q3b. In a few words of your own, why would you vote NO on this ballot measure? Way too many apartment and condo
buildings being built without
consideration of traffic and infrastructure.
Traffic in Hayward is ridiculous.
Hurts the poor instead of
making the richest pay.
We shouldn't
have to add
extra taxes to
maintain what
should come
from the
normal budget.
I believe we've already
approved bonds and
taxes to support these
things.
Inflation. Getting too
expensive to survive.
25 Voter Priorities
26 Ext./Very
Impt.
79%
76%
75%
74%
73%
73%
72%
72%
Q8. I am going to read you a list of specific City projects and services that could be funded if voters approve a ballot measure generating additional revenue like the one I mentioned earlier. Please tell me how important each one is to you: extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not important. ^Not Part of Split Sample
38%
41%
39%
36%
42%
32%
36%
35%
41%
35%
36%
38%
31%
41%
36%
37%
17%
17%
18%
20%
16%
17%
20%
21%
7%
6%
5%
5%
5%
5%
6%
5%
^Providing fire protection
Improving street safety for drivers,
pedestrians, and cyclists
Fixing streets and repairing potholes
Preparing for natural disasters
and emergencies
^Improving 911 emergency
response times
Protecting Hayward’s fiscal stability
Repairing storm drains to prevent
water pollution
Ext. Impt. Very Impt. Smwt. Impt. Not Impt. Don't Know
Voters highly prioritize fire protection, street
safety, pothole repair and disaster preparation.
Providing services to
community members who are
experiencing homelessness
27 Ext./Very
Impt.
71%
70%
69%
69%
69%
69%
68%
Q8. I am going to read you a list of specific City projects and services that could be funded if voters approve a ballot measure generating additional revenue like the one I mentioned earlier. Please tell me how important each one is to you: extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not important. ^Not Part of Split Sample
33%
34%
40%
35%
33%
32%
34%
38%
36%
29%
34%
37%
37%
34%
24%
21%
21%
22%
25%
22%
19%
7%
8%
6%
7%
10%
Fixing deteriorating sidewalks
Providing services for low-income
families such as healthcare, education,
counseling, and childcare
^Providing police patrols
Providing senior services
Providing after-school and summer
programs for youth
Ext. Impt. Very Impt. Smwt. Impt. Not Impt. Don't Know
Broad majorities also value providing police
patrols and senior and youth services.
Upgrading emergency and
disaster communication systems to
better collaborate with other
public safety agencies
Bringing police and community
members together to build
relationships and collaborate on
solving neighborhood problems
28 Ext./Very
Impt.
67%
67%
65%
62%
61%
60%
59%
57%
Q8. I am going to read you a list of specific City projects and services that could be funded if voters approve a ballot measure generating additional revenue like the one I mentioned earlier. Please tell me how important each one is to you: extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not important. Split Sample
40%
36%
27%
28%
32%
28%
31%
29%
27%
31%
38%
34%
29%
32%
29%
29%
21%
26%
27%
21%
21%
20%
26%
27%
9%
6%
7%
12%
17%
16%
10%
13%
Removing blight, litter, and graffiti
Removing overgrown vegetation to
reduce fire risk
Providing more space at libraries to
ensure children are not turned away
from reading programs
Responding to climate change
Providing high-speed fiber optic
internet throughout the City
Removing mold and asbestos from
City buildings
Replacing outdated plumbing and
sewage systems in City buildings
Ext. Impt. Very Impt. Smwt. Impt. Not Impt. Don't Know
Three in five or more value removing blight and
vegetation and responding to climate change.
Expanding pilot programs providing
clinical mental health response to
people in crisis
29 Ext./Very
Impt.
57%
55%
55%
54%
51%
49%
49%
46%
Q8. I am going to read you a list of specific City projects and services that could be funded if voters approve a ballot measure generating additional revenue like the one I mentioned earlier. Please tell me how important each one is to you: extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not important. ^Not Part of Split Sample
28%
26%
24%
24%
23%
22%
17%
21%
30%
29%
31%
30%
28%
27%
32%
25%
30%
27%
23%
28%
28%
36%
30%
36%
11%
15%
18%
14%
16%
12%
15%
15%
5%
6%
Upgrading City buildings for
earthquake safety
Upgrading City buildings to improve
access for people with disabilities
Upgrading police and fire stations to
provide locker rooms for women
Building a youth and family center in
South Hayward, The Stack Center
Upgrading the animal shelter to
improve health, safety, and well-being
of animals and staff
Updating public works facilities
Improving energy efficiency in
City buildings
Ext. Impt. Very Impt. Smwt. Impt. Not Impt. Don't Know
Lower-priority items include building or
upgrading City facilities.
^Building a new fire station in the
Hayward hills to protect against wildfire
30 Ext./Very
Impt.
46%
43%
42%
41%
40%
39%
29%
Q8. I am going to read you a list of specific City projects and services that could be funded if voters approve a ballot measure generating additional revenue like the one I mentioned earlier. Please tell me how important each one is to you: extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not important. ^Not Part of Split Sample
17%
15%
14%
15%
15%
16%
11%
29%
28%
28%
26%
26%
23%
18%
31%
32%
46%
35%
35%
33%
37%
18%
20%
10%
17%
20%
22%
31%
5%
7%
5%
6%
Updating a South Hayward library and
community center
Upgrading library technology
Maintaining landscaping and medians
Replacing public works facilities
^Repairing and upgrading the Weekes
Branch Library in South Hayward
^Replacing the outdated
police headquarters with a
Public Safety Center
Providing rooms for quiet study and
community meetings
Ext. Impt. Very Impt. Smwt. Impt. Not Impt. Don't Know
Repairing and replacing public works facilities, the
Weekes Branch, and police HQ are less urgent.
31 The Impact of
More Information
32 45%
25%
3%
1%
6%
16%
4%
Total
Yes
73%
Total
No
23%
Initial Vote After Positive and
Negative Messaging
After Positive
Messaging
52%
19%
4%
2%
4%
14%
5%
Total
Yes
75%
Total
No
20%
40%
18%
6%
2%
8%
19%
9%
Total
Yes
63%
Total
No
28%
Q2 Total, Q10 & Q12. Would you vote “yes” or “no”?
Definitely yes
Probably yes
Undecided, lean yes
Undecided, lean no
Probably no
Definitely no
Undecided
Opinion shifts after hearing messages
in favor and against.
33 Segmenting the Electorate
by Consistency of Support
❖ Consistent Definitely Yes: Voters who
consistently indicated they would
definitely vote yes on the measure.
❖ Ever No: Voters who indicated they at any
time would vote no on the measure.
❖ Swing: Voters who do not fall into any of
the other categories – remaining
consistently undecided or switching
between degrees of support and
indecision.
The following slide shows demographic
groups that disproportionately fall into one
category or the other.
Consistent
Definitely
Yes
30%
Swing
36%
Ever No
34%
34 Consistent Definitely Yes Swing Ever No
30% of the Electorate 36% of the Electorate 34% of the Electorate Ages 75+ Interviewed in Spanish Republican Men
Ages 65+ Ages 18-29 Chinese Voters
Filipino Voters African American Voters Independents Ages 50+ Ages 65-74 High School Educated Conservative Republicans Democrats Ages 50+ Democrats Ages 18-49 Independent Men White Voters Men Ages 18-49 Republicans Ages 50+
Liberal Democrats Ages 30-39 Moderate/Conservative
Independents
Non-College Educated Women Non-College Educated Men Republicans Liberals Other Asian/
Pacific Islander Voters Ages 50-64
Ages 18-49 Independents
Latinos Men Ages 50+
Independent Women Conservatives
Women Ages 18-49 Republicans Ages 18-49
Independents Ages 18-49 Liberal/Moderate Republicans
Democratic Men
Demographic Profile of the Segments
35 Conclusions
36 Conclusions
• Majorities of voters are satisfied with Hayward’s quality of life and the provision of City services – but at their lowest levels in 15 years of surveying. • More than seven in ten see a need for additional funding to increase or maintain essential City services and facilities.
• With a focus on the priorities voters share most widely, a Measure C extension is well- positioned for passage in November 2024.
▪ Based on potential ballot language alone, as many as 78% of Hayward voters are supportive.
▪ This includes majorities across age, gender, race/ethnicity, and party. ▪ While a 20-year sunset has broader support, a 30-year sunset also has backing from a significant share of voters.
▪ Support remains well over a simple majority even after critiques. ▪ One note of caution: Opposition arguments cause a significant dip in the share of the “yes” vote. This shows how important education about the measure will be. • Voters’ top funding priorities include fire protection, street safety, pothole and storm-drain repair, disaster preparation, and services for people experiencing homelessness. They value upgrades to City facilities with much less urgency than the services staff provide from those facilities.
For more information,
contact:
Dave Metz
[email protected]
Miranda Everitt
[email protected]
1999 Harrison St., Suite 2020
Oakland, CA 94612
Phone (510) 451-9521
Fax (510) 451-0384
ITEM# 25
PH 23-030
LLAD 96-1 Public Hearing
ITEM# 26
PH 23-032
Maintenance District No. 1
Public Hearing
ITEM# 27
PH 23-031
Maintenance District No. 2
Public Hearing
City of Hayward
LLAD/MD
Public Hearing Reports – Assessment
Districts
MAINTENANCE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
JUNE 27, 2023
Director: Todd Rullman
Management Analyst: Manny Grewal and Liz Sanchez
Consultant: Kyle Tankard (SCI Consulting Group)
1 LLAD
Overview
• 18 Separate Landscaping and
Lighting Zones
• Annual Assessments on Tax Bills
fund:
o Maintenance and servicing of
landscaping, lighting, parks,
and other improvements
within each Zone
o Each Zone has a separate
budget pertaining to its
respective improvements
being maintained
2 Benefited Improvements
Landscaping, lighting, parks, and other improvements
3 Benefit Zones 1-18
4 A B C D E
Zone Name/Location Year Formed Type of
Development
Number of Assessed
Parcels/SFE
1 Huntwood Ave. and Panjon St. 1990 Residential 30
2 Harder Rd. and Mocine Ave. 1991 Residential 85
3 Prominence 1992 Residential 155
4 Stratford Village 1995 Residential 174
5 Soto Rd. and Plum Tree St. 1995 Residential 38
6 Pepper Tree Park 1982 Industrial 11
7 Twin Bridges 1998 Residential 348
8 Capitola St. 1999 Residential 24
9 Orchard Ave. 2000 Residential 74
10 Eden Shores 2003 Residential 534
11 Stonebrae 2006, 2018, 2020 Residential 644
12 Eden Shores East (Spindrift) 2007, 2016 Residential 379 13 Cannery Place 2008 Residential 599
14 La Vista 2016 Residential 179
15 Cadence 2017 Residential 206
16 Blackstone 2016 Residential 157
17 Parkside Heights 2019 Residential 97
18 SoHay 2019 Residential 433
4,167
Self-Maintained.
Total Assessed Parcels:
TABLE 1: DESCRIPTION OF BENEFIT ZONES
Proposed FY
2024
Assessment
Rates
5 • No FY 2024 Rate Increase:
o Zones 6, 14, 15, AND 18
• FY 2024 Rate Increases (3%):
o Zones 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10,
11, 12, 13, 16, and 17
Next Steps for LLAD, Zones 1-18
I. Hold Public Hearing
Staff recommends that Council then adopts two
resolutions:
1. Approving FY 2024 Engineer’s Report and ordering the Levy of FY 2024 Assessments
2. Appropriating FY 2024 Budget
6 Maintenance
District No. 1
(Stratford
Village)
7 Proposed FY
2024
Assessment
Rate
• Maximum Base Assessment Rate:
o $243.92
• FY 2024 Assessment Rate:
o $243.92 (Same rate as last
year)
8 City of Hayward
Maintenance District No. 1 - Pacheco Wy., Stratford Rd., Russ Ln., & Ward Crk.
Fund 270, Project 3745
Established 1993, 174 Parcels
FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024
Budget Detail Actual Actual Estimated Proposed
Assessment
a. Maximum Base Assessment Amount 243.92 243.92 243.92 243.92 b. Annual Per Parcel Assessment 243.92 243.92 243.92 243.92 c. # of Parcels 174 174 174 174 d. Total Amount Assessed for the District: 42,442 42,442 42,442 42,442 Income
a. Annual Assessment Revenue 42,647 42,910 42,442 42,442 b. Minus County Tax Collection Fee (1.7%) (722) (722) (722) (722) c. Other 92 - - - d. Total Revenue: 42,017 42,188 41,721 41,721 Services
a. Utilities: PGE 1,680 2,390 2,461 2,535 b. Pump Station O&M - ACFCD 54,613 42,281 43,549 44,856 c. Proposition 218 - 27,500 - - d. Property Owner Noticing - - 103 106 e. Annual Reporting 553 1,012 1,032 1,063 f. City Administration 3,605 - - - g. Total Expenditures: 60,451 73,183 47,146 48,560 Account Balance
a. Beginning Account Balance 28,780 10,345 (20,649) (26,075) b. Net Change (Revenue - Expenditures) (18,434) (30,995) (5,425) (6,840) c. Ending Account Balance: 10,345 (20,649) (26,075) (32,915) Next Steps for MD No. 1
I. Hold Public Hearing
Staff recommends that Council then adopts two
resolutions:
1. Approving FY 2024 Engineer’s Report and ordering the Levy of FY 2024 Assessments
2. Appropriating FY 2024 Budget
9 Maintenance
District No. 2
(Eden
Shores)
10 Proposed FY
2024
Assessment
Rate
• Maximum Base Assessment Rate:
o $1,125.80 (5.30% CPI increase)
• FY 2024 Assessment Rate:
o $264.24 (3% increase from FY
23)
11 City of Hayward
Maintenance District No. 2 - Eden Shores - Water Buffer Fund 271, Project 3718
Established 2003, 534 Parcels
FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024
Actual Actual Estimated Proposed
Assessment
a. Maximum Base Assessment Amount 1,000.68 1,016.39 1,069.14 1,125.80 b. Annual Per Parcel Assessment 198.95 228.79 240.22 264.24 c. # of Parcels 534 534 534 534 d. Total Amount Assessed for the District: 106,239 122,175 128,277 141,104 Income
a. Annual Assessment Revenue 106,925 122,605 128,277 141,104 b. Minus County Tax Collection Fee (1.7%) (1,806) (2,077) (2,181) (2,399) c. Other 1,550 (7,045) 3,400 3,600 d. Total Revenue: 106,669 113,483 129,497 142,305 Services
a. Utilities: Water 48,063 50,682 60,000 70,000 b. Utilities: PGE 9,204 16,138 17,000 18,000 c. Maintenance - Landscaping - New Image - 32,688 33,669 34,679 d. Maintenance - Pond - Solitude 2,184 - - - e. Maintenance - One-Time Project/Maintenance 39,288 42,973 10,000 45,000 f. Fence Repair - 75,000
h. Pump Repair - 30,000
i. Fire Hazard Mitigation (Goats) - - - 7,500 j. Property Owner Noticing 172 218 260 268 k. Annual Reporting 552 1,012 1,032 1,063 l. City Administration 4,080 4,202 4,328 4,458 m. Total Expenditures: 103,543 147,912 156,289 255,968 Account Balance
a. Beginning Account Balance 371,526 374,652 340,223 313,431 b. Net Change (Revenue - Expenditures) 3,126 (34,429) (26,792) (113,663) c. Ending Account Balance: 374,652 340,223 313,431 199,768 Next Steps for MD No. 2
I. Hold Public Hearing
Staff recommends that Council then adopts two
resolutions:
1. Approving FY 2024 Engineer’s Report and ordering the Levy of FY 2024 Assessments
2. Appropriating FY 2024 Budget
12