Hayward City Council
January 30, 2024

Cost Considerations and Variables
For each measure, the cost description focuses on both internal (City) costs and external (community) costs and provides insight into the variability of these costs including the primary variables that may affect cost effectiveness including several primary considerations including upfront costs, lifecycle costs, incremental or marginal costs, and the cost of doing nothing. This analysis is not intended to provide exact and precise cost estimates for each of the measures. The costs described for each measure are variable and provide a general range carried by differed parties associated with the measures.

Upfront versus Lifecycle Costs
When discussing how much a strategy or action costs, it is important to differentiate between the upfront costs, the cost of, for example, an LED light bulb, versus the lifecycle costs of purchasing, operating, maintaining, and ultimately disposing of that lightbulb. While LED lightbulbs may be more expensive up front when compared to an incandescent bulb, the lifecycle costs of owning an LED lightbulb are significantly lower, providing a significant return on investment.

Incremental or Marginal Costs
It is also important to specify the difference between how much a strategy costs overall and what the incremental or marginal cost is. The incremental or marginal cost is the difference in cost between the new action and the old or standard action. For example, purchasing a new electric vehicle (EV) could cost $30,000 which should be considered a high cost. However, the marginal cost of purchasing an electric vehicle versus purchasing a new internal combustion vehicle may be zero or near zero because of reduced long-term operating and maintenance costs including no fluids to replace, fewer moving parts like transmissions, and less brake wear. It is important to consider what the incremental/marginal costs are for each strategy by keeping in mind what the alternative costs are. In many cases, the difference is negligible.

The Cost of Doing Nothing
Finally, it’s also important to keep in mind that doing nothing to prepare for and mitigate climate change will also carry a cost. The alternative to implementing these strategies is not zero. One immediate example is the cost to install conduit and panel capacity for electric vehicle chargers for all new construction. While this action increases upfront construction costs by a few hundred dollars, doing that same work after the building is completed can be an order of magnitude higher (~$3,000). Given the move towards electric vehicles, the cost of not installing EV infrastructure today could cost the community significantly more in the future. In a similar vein, adaptation strategies will cost the city and the community today. Planting trees, installing microgrids, and setting up cooling centers all have upfront costs. However, it’s imperative that we weight these costs against the costs of a future without these adaptive strategies given what we know about the climate. Research published in the journal Nature predicts the cost of not decreasing GHG emissions to carbon neutrality by mid-century could range between $149.78 trillion to $791.98 trillion globally by the end of the century.1 That same study found that if we mitigate climate change and achieve carbon neutrality by mid-century the world could see a $127-to-$616 trillion-dollar economic benefit after considering the cost of mitigation. The humanitarian impact is also significant. The Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies estimate that the number of people in need of humanitarian aid each year could double to $200 million annually by 2050

1 Wei, Yi-Ming et al. Nature Communications. 2020. Self-preservation strategy for approaching global warming targets in the post-Paris Agreement era. Accessed at https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-15453-z. Accessed August 2022.

Hayward CAP Update
GHG Measures Cost Ranges

due to climate change costing $20 billion per year.2 Furthermore, the World Resources Institute has found that investing in adaptation and resilience provides a benefit-cost ratio ranging from 2:1 to 10:1, meaning that for every dollar invested in resilience and adaptation we stand to see $2 to $10 dollars’ worth of benefits.

Cost Range Analysis
Climate Action Plans exhibit high variability in implementation costs depending on the measures identified, their level of specificity, and the accompanying funding and financing strategies, which may vary depending on the scope of the project. The cost range estimates are based on cost data derived from past projects, case studies, and available research.

The GHG measures proposed for the CAP Update and listed below have been broken down into 3 cost segments which include:

1. Low-Cost: the low-hanging fruit for the City and community to reduce GHG emissions, generally delineated as measures associated with relatively low upfront costs to the City or community, e.g. policy ordinances and outreach

2. Moderate-Cost: intermediate level of costs per measure implementation associated with consultant and moderate infrastructure changes, moderate upfront or lifecycle costs associated with e.g. feasibility studies, program development, retrofitting existing infrastructure, program and tax fees, and small capital investments such as purchasing a tree

3. High-Cost: longer term projects requiring substantial investments into major infrastructure or technology over time to reduce emissions, e.g., electrification equipment, electric buses, energy storage, bike lanes, infrastructure changes
The tables below categorize each measure into a low, moderate, or high City and community cost categories as described above and also explain the variables and existing data and case studies on which these categorizations were made.

2 International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. 2019. The Cost of Doing Nothing: The Humanitarian Price of Climate Change and How it Can be Avoided. Accessed at https://reliefweb.int/report/world/cost-doing-nothing-humanitarian-price-climate-change-and-how-it- can-be-avoided. Accessed August 2022.

Measure BE-1: Continue the all-electric requirement for new residential construction. Adopt an all-electric requirement for new non-residential construction to take effect by 2026 City Costs Moderate Cost
City Cost Variables - Staff time to develop and adopt ordinance and code amendments - Staff time to produce collateral for educational programs and engagements - Collateral materials

City Cost Discussion Adopting reach codes and building codes generally requires staff time to implement. City staff will need to dedicate time to create educational materials and publish on the website, a low cost, with large potential audience. Workshops, however, will require one-time costs and support from Communications and Media Relations and Environmental Services and Building divisions.

Community Cost Moderate Cost
Hayward CAP Update
GHG Measures Cost Ranges

Community Costs
Variables
- Cost savings of all electric homes compared to mix fuel - Long-term costs on energy bills

Community Costs
Discussion
Cost effectiveness studies completed for Hayward’s climate zones show that new building electrification costs less to build than mixed fuel buildings. Single family homes are $5,149 dollars less expensive to build all-electric compared to a mixed fuel home. However, annual energy bills are expected to increase by $423 in an all- electric new home versus a mixed fuel home.1 Therefore, this measure is considered to be a moderate cost.

Source:

1. Local Energy Codes - City of Hayward Cost Effectiveness Explorer. https://explorer.localenergycodes.com/jurisdiction/hayward-city/study- results/3-PGE?only_study_type=new-buildings. Accessed August 2022 Measure BE-2: Electrify existing single-family residential buildings in order to achieve 100 therms/person/year by 2030 and 0 therms/person in 2045.

City Costs High Cost
City Cost Variables - Staff time to develop and adopt ordinance - Staff time to develop strategic plans
- Staff time for partnerships with businesses and private property owners - Staff time to produce collateral for education and engagements - Staff time for new program management
- Collateral materials including the update on online permitting process

City Cost Discussion Actions related to this measure will require a larger amount of time from City staff as compared to other Building Electrification measures. The most significant resource will be needed for the expansion of the Residential Energy Performance Assessment and Disclosure ordinance with an additional full-time equivalent (FTE) staff to monitor compliance and further facilitate permitting online, as well as developing an electrification strategy with building analysis to be authored by the City. Creating a strategy for electrification of buildings, and devoting staff time for collaborative partnerships, such as with the California Air Resources Board (CARB), to allow neighborhood level electrification/banning of natural gas will also be a significant lift to City and City officials.

Community Cost High Cost
Community Costs
Variables
- Cost of converting to electric homes from mix fuel
- Long-term costs on energy bills

Community Costs
Discussion
Electrifying an existing single-family residential building holds significant upfront costs.

Electrifying a home assumes including a heat pump for heating and cooling, heat pump water heater, and an electric resistance clothes dryer and stove. With these appliances considered, electrification upfront costs can range from $7,930 to $25,780, without incentives. Additionally, in Hayward’s climate zones, annual energy bill costs are expected to increase by up to 33%. However, if electrification is paired with installation of solar PV, annual energy bill savings can almost double.1 Existing single-family home electrification is considered high cost, without offset solar.

Source: Berkeley, City of. Existing Building Electrification Strategy. 2021. https://berkeleyca.gov/sites/default/files/2022- 01/Berkeley-Existing-Buildings-Electrification-Strategy.pdf. Accessed August 2022.

Hayward CAP Update
GHG Measures Cost Ranges

Measure BE-3: Decarbonize existing commercial and multi-family buildings in order to achieve 53 therms per service person in 2030 and 0 therms per service person in 2045.

City Costs High Cost
City Cost Variables - Staff time to develop strategic plant such as Decarbonization Strategy - Staff time to enforce ordinance
- Staff time to produce collateral for education and engagements

City Cost
Discussion
Creating a Decarbonization Strategy, while high cost to the city to create, is an important step informing subsequent actions to decarbonize existing commercial and multi-family buildings.

The proposal to enforce compliance of a newly adopted electrification ordinance may likely come at high a cost to the City, particular with increased staff time. Enforcement may require additional staff training. Preparation, distribution, and sharing of collateral will also impact key departments such as the City Manager and Development Services.

Community Cost Moderate Cost
Community Costs
Variables
- Cost savings of all electric homes compared to mix fuel - Long-term costs on energy bills

Community Costs
Discussion
Cost effectiveness studies completed for Hayward’s climate zones show that new building electrification costs less to build than mixed fuel buildings. Multi-family homes are $3,361 dollars, office buildings are $75,337 dollars, and retail buildings are $28,308 dollars less expensive to build all-electric compared to a mixed fuel home. However, annual energy bills are expected to increase by $176 for multi-family homes, $4,774 for office buildings and $481 for retail buildings in an all-electric new home versus a mixed fuel home.1 Therefore, this measure is considered a moderate cost.

Source:

1. Local Energy Codes. City of Hayward Cost Effectiveness Explorer. https://explorer.localenergycodes.com/jurisdiction/hayward- city/study-results/3-PGE?only_study_type=new-buildings. Accessed August 2022

Measure BE-4: Support Ava Community Energy in providing 100% carbon-free electricity by 2030.

City Costs Moderate Cost
City Cost Variables - Staff time to manage development of Resolution Plan for 100% Carbon- free Electricity and identify funding and subsidy plan
- One-time staff time to develop process to monitor rates

City Cost Discussion The adoption of a City resolution to be 100% carbon-free electricity must include identification of funding and subsidy plan to ensure cost continuity. The effort to identify funds, manage continued partnerships with Ava Community Energy, and authoring a resolution is typical to the City’s process today, and is not expected to significantly impact staff resources. More significant, however, is the time that will be required to develop a process and enabling the monitoring of annual opt- out rates in the City of Hayward.

Community Cost Low Cost
Hayward CAP Update
GHG Measures Cost Ranges

Community Costs Variables - Electricity Costs per Rate Plan Community Costs Discussion Decarbonizing Ava Community Energy’s electricity may cost the community a marginal increase in money spent per kWh. However, this increased electricity cost depends on the rate plans used by the household/business. Based on the rate schedule of Measure BE-1, Measure BE-2, and Measure BE-3 and an average monthly usage of 416 kWh, monthly bills would increase approximately $4 per month under the Ava Community Energy Renewable 100 rate plan for both standard and CARE rates.1

Sources:

1. PG&E. EBCE Joint Rate Comparisons. https://www.pge.com/pge_global/common/pdfs/customer-service/other-services/alternative- energy-providers/community-choice-aggregation/ebce_rateclasscomparison.pdf. Accessed August 2022.

Measure BE-5: Continue to promote energy efficiency improvement, in alignment with the existing the 2014 Climate Action Plan
City Costs Moderate Cost
City Cost Variables - Staff time to manage multiple programs - Staff time to procure funding

City Cost
Discussion
Continuing to promote energy efficiency improvements will lead to moderate costs to the City.

Primarily, costs are associated with staff time needed to manage programs (e.g., weatherization program and energy benchmarking trainings) and time needed to obtain funding for the weatherization program.

Community Cost Moderate Cost
Community Costs
Variables
- Cost associated with procuring energy efficient equipment and appliances - Cost associated with energy benchmarking programs

Community Costs
Discussion
Community costs are associated with the upfront costs related to procurement of energy efficient equipment and appliances. However, over time, energy efficient upgrades lead to electricity and natural gas resource and cost savings to community members. Nonresidential building owners may face costs associated with energy benchmarking programs.

Measure BE-6: Generate carbon-neutral electricity on City facilities meeting 80% of the municipal operational electricity needs by 2030.

City Costs Moderate Cost
City Cost Variables - Staff time to streamline permitting for battery storage - Staff time to manage inventory of and implementation at key locations for energy storage and/or generation projects (solar projects; inventory of appliance; others) - Staff time to advocate for smooth integration of identified solar projects into the grid

City Cost
Discussion
Creating a streamlined permitting process for battery storage is a new process and requires staff training. The development of energy resiliency strategies, a transition of natural gas appliances to electric in City facilities plan, and the plan and schedule for future solar projects will also require substantial staff time to complete but is an important skeleton to implement actions outlined.

Hayward CAP Update
GHG Measures Cost Ranges

Community Cost No expected community costs
Community Costs
Variables
No expected community costs
Community Costs
Discussion
There are no community costs associated with this measure. The City is not expected to raise local taxes to fund this measure. The City would have to receive voter approval to raise local taxes.

Measure T-1: Increase active transportation mode share to 15% by 2030 and to 20% by 2045.

City Costs High Cost
City Cost Variables - Staff time to develop and adopt an ordinance and code amendments - Staff time to procure funding (i.e., grant management) - Cost and staff time to manage and implement Street Improvements Priority List
City Cost Discussion Actions required to develop and implement an Active Transportation Plan will require staff time for oversight. The City will also need time to adopt new policies, such as the micromobility policy and mobility share policy, as well as review and update regulations in the Transportation Demand Plan, Zoning Codes, and Building Code. Further, the implementation of a pilot bike-share program will require oversight from the City staff; however, this are typically one-time costs. The table notes below showcase typical funding received by municipalities in for these policies.1
Amending the Off-Street Parking Regulation of Municipal Code to update ongoing incentives and requirements for transportation will also incur City costs as the program already faces limited staffing and fiscal resources. Staff time will also need to be devoted to identifying, applying, and monitoring compliance for grant opportunities to improve mobility in the community (1 FTE) is anticipated given the typical size of funds received.

Additionally, developing a priority list of street improvements will be an added time cost for the City, depending on the City’s current method for tracking street conditions. Identifying streets for permanent active transportation traffic may also be politically challenging; and thus, require additional staff time for engagement and stakeholder management.

Community Cost Low Cost
Community Costs Variables Costs associated with funding mechanism, e.g. sales tax or parcel tax Community Costs Discussion Community costs may include potential funding mechanisms for this infrastructure, such as a parcel tax, sales tax, and more. However, substantial cost savings opportunities exist within diverting drivers from the road to improve health and quality of life. Additionally, the institution of car-free days downtown can enable more active transportation and pedestrian-friendly events (e.g., farmers markets).

Notes:

1. Orange County, California, employs several transit incentives programs for individuals, including monetary incentives for starting a carpool, online platforms for connecting carpool and vanpool partners, reimbursements for bus and train passes, monetary incentives for electric vehicles, Club Rideshare which offers monthly prize drawings and merchant discounts, and reimbursements for emergency rides home.

Participation levels in these programs is not reported. The City of Palo Alto, CA, has received $1.1 million in federal USDOT Mobility on Demand funding for developing a pilot program involving commuter trip reduction software, a mobility aggregation multimodal trip planning app, workplace parking rebates and analytics to compare commutes in order to reduce vehicle commuting.

Hayward CAP Update
GHG Measures Cost Ranges

Measure T-2: Implement public and shared transit programs to increase mode shift to public and shared transit mode to 15% by 2030 and 30% by 2045.

City Costs High Cost
City Cost Variables - Staff time to develop and adopt an ordinance and code amendments - Staff time to manage multiple programs
- Staff time to procure funding (i.e., grant management) - Student Transit Pass Program cost
City Cost Discussion Staffing time and expanding city staff capacity are two key drivers of City costs for this measure. Of lower magnitude costs is the required policy work such as: adopting a policy or code for transit accessible public spaces, adopting parking requirements for mixed-use consistent with the Parking Management Plan, adopting an ordinance to require carshare in new developments, and implementing a requirement for employer developed Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan. Additional time will be required to identify and pursue funding for City transit and TDM projects (anticipated as 1 FTE), as well as for obtaining grant funds for AC Transit expansion (1 FTE).

The City will also need to expand oversight of transit programs. This includes additional responsibilities for transit stops, evaluating needed renovations to meet Pedestrian Design Standards for transit stops. Further, expansion of the Student Transit Pass Program will be completed by the City.

Lastly, actions required to implement transit programs include at least three feasibility studies that City staff will need to oversee in some capacity.

Community Cost Low Cost
Community Costs
Variables
- Transit Passes
Community Costs
Discussion
Community members will incur costs from transit passes. A monthly local transit pass and a monthly Transbay pass from AC Transit are $84.60 and $216 respectively.1 Savings opportunities exist through less driving and better health outcomes resulting from better air quality and more active transportation methods, like share bike lanes. Variable costs stem from new requirements resulting from future ordinances that consider a shift away from single occupancy vehicles, such as parking reductions or minimums, bike parking requirements, parking prices, and more.

Source:

1. AC Transit. Fares. https://www.actransit.org/fares. Accessed August 2022

Measure T-3: Develop disincentives for driving single passenger vehicles to support the bicycle/pedestrian and public transit mode share goals of Measures T-2 and T-3
City Costs Low Cost
City Cost Variables - Cost of updating Transportation Demand Management Plan - Cost of setting up and disseminating disincentive programs City Cost Discussion Updating the City’s TDM Plan that includes strategies to reduce peak-hour traffic will require significant City time to author and subject matter expertise. Political challenges involved in reducing parking minimums and maximums may also be a cost to the City staff in meeting this measure, requiring coordination across key departments such as Public Works and Development Services.

Hayward CAP Update
GHG Measures Cost Ranges

Measure T-4: Increase passenger zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) adoption to 15% by 2030 and 50% by 2045 City Costs Moderate Cost
City Cost Variables - Cost of EV chargers
- Staff time to establish partnerships and produce collateral for education programs and engagements

City Cost Discussion Costs incurred by the City in increasing passenger zero-emissions vehicle adoption will depend on various factors. The total cost of purchasing and installing EV chargers will depend on the number of chargers in City-owned properties determines is feasible and the capacity for Ava Community Energy to support the City. An example of municipal EV infrastructure funding is showcased below.1
Also related to this measure, the City will likely need to dedicate significant time to forming partnerships with ZEV car share companies, but may leverage collaboration with neighboring jurisdictions.

Community Cost Moderate Cost
Community Costs
Variables
- Cost of charging infrastructure
- Marginal cost of EV selected (Cost of combustion vehicle compared to EV alternative) - Lifecycle costs of EV ownership
- Lifecycle costs of combustion vehicle ownership

Community Cost Moderate Cost
Community Costs
Variables
- Costs associated with disincentive programs or mechanisms - TDM Compliance
Community Costs
Discussion
The cost to the local business community due to the implementation of a TDM Plan requirement may vary depending on the transportation management measures, including cost of transit passes and cost of compliance. For example, allowing employees to continue telecommuting 1-2 days a week could cost employers nothing, while providing transit subsidies could be $100 per employee per month, and charging for parking could generate revenue for a monthly bike commute competition. Implementation costs will be developed as part of the TDM plan. The community may also face costs from specific disincentive programs. For example, as stated in action T-3.5, a congestion charge program would charge drivers a fee to drive in congested areas of the City during rush areas. Program revenue would be used to expand active and transit services. San Francisco’s current proposed pricing chargers based on income levels with middle and high-income drivers being charge the most at $6.50 to low-income drivers being charged $2.17 and very low-income driver not being charged.1 Additionally, as stated in T-3.9, a Transportation Network Company (TNC) user tax would impose a fee for ride-hail vehicle trips. San Francisco County imposes a 3.25% surcharge on all individual rides and a 1.5% surcharge on shared rides that originate in San Francisco.2 Program revenue would also be utilized to expand active and transit services. Savings opportunities exist through less driving and better health outcomes resulting from better air quality and more active transportation methods, like shared bike lanes.

Sources:

1. San Francisco County Transportation Authority- Downtown Congestion Pricing. https://www.sfcta.org/downtown#:~:text=Congestion%20pricing%20involves%20charging%20drivers,used%20to%20improve% 20transit%20service. Accessed August 2022

2. San Francisco County Transportation Authority – TNC Tax. https://www.sfcta.org/funding/tnc- tax#:~:text=The%20tax%20imposes%20a%203.25,that%20originate%20in%20San%20Francisco. Accessed August 2022.

Hayward CAP Update
GHG Measures Cost Ranges

Community Costs
Discussion
The community may see increased upfront costs associated with the purchase of an EV. The cost of an electric vehicle varies significantly depending on the EV chosen. Since the purchase of an EV will likely offset the purchase of an internal combustion vehicle, the marginal cost should be considered here. EVs also offer considerable opportunities for lifecycle cost savings compared to their internal combustion (ICE) or hybrid vehicle counterparts since they do not need oil changes, transmission fluid changes, spark plugs etc. For example, the electric MINI cooper emits approximately half of the greenhouse gas emissions than that of its ICE and hybrid models while costing considerably less per month in fuel, maintenance, and total vehicle costs per month.1 In general, new electric vehicles may or may not cost more upfront, but generally cost less over their lifetime compared to combustion vehicles.

There will also be community costs associated with EV charging stations. While community members may utilize public charging stations, many need to utilize charging at home overnight. Installing a Level 2 charger at home is about $2,000 for parts and installation.2

Notes:

1. The County of San Diego procured $21.7 million in funds to support EV infrastructure needs. The California Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Project (CALeVIP), a program funded by CEC that provides incentives for EV charger installations, provided the county with $15.8 million in funds. The San Diego Association of Governments and San Diego County Air Pollution Control District provided the remaining $5.9 million through sales tax revenue and motor vehicle fees. These funds were used to provide individual rebates up to $6,000 for Level 2 charger.

Sources:

1. MIT Trancik Lab. Carbon Counter. Accessed at https://www.carboncounter.com/#!/explore?cars=35870;35756;36427. Accessed August 2022.Property Manager Insider. 2019. How Much do EV Charing Stations Cost? https://www.propertymanagerinsider.com/how-much-do-ev-charging-stations-cost/. Accessed August 2022.

2. How much does it cost to charge an electric car? https://www.kbb.com/car-advice/how-much-does-it-cost-to-charge-an-ev/.

Accessed August 2022

Measure T-5: Increase zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) adoption by businesses to 10% by 2030 and 80% by 2045.

City Costs Low Cost
City Cost Variables - Staff time to produce collateral for education programs and engagements City Cost Discussion Actions required to increase business zero-emission vehicle adoption require significant engagement efforts for city personnel with local stakeholders. Depending on current staff capacity to conduct additional engagement and outreach, as well as current relationships with key community employers, the magnitude of this cost may vary.

Community Cost Moderate Cost
Community Costs
Variables
- Cost of charging infrastructure
- Marginal cost of EV selected (Cost of combustion vehicle compared to EV alternative) - Lifecycle costs of EV ownership
- Lifecycle costs of combustion vehicle ownership
Community Costs
Discussion
The community costs to businesses for increased ZEV adoption is expected to be the same as the cost to passengers.

Measure T-6: Transition 15% of off-road equipment to zero-emission by 2030 and 80% by 2045.

City Costs Moderate Cost (Near-term)
Hayward CAP Update
GHG Measures Cost Ranges

City Cost Variables - Staff time to develop and adopt an ordinance - Staff time to manage programs and feasibility studies - Cost to develop City-owned End-of-Life Off-Road Equipment Plan - Staff time to produce collateral for educational programs and engagements City Cost Discussion The development and implementation of a City-owned End-of-Life Off-Road Equipment Plan and the Small Off-Road Equipment Ordinance that includes evaluation of current equipment, alternative options, and replacement timeline will require significant time for City personnel to create, including staff in-reach and training campaign. Oversight of the replacement program will also be a significant for the Maintenance Services department.

Community Cost Moderate Cost
Community Costs
Variables
- Cost of charging infrastructure
- Marginal cost of electric off-road equipment selected (Cost of combustion equipment compared to electric alternative)
- Lifecycle costs of electric off-road equipment ownership - Lifecycle costs of combustion equipment ownership
Community Costs
Discussion
The community may incur upfront costs associated with electric off-road equipment. The cost of electric off-road equipment varies depending on the type of off-road equipment and version chosen. Off-road equipment includes landscape equipment, such as leaf blowers and lawn mowers, tractors, forklifts, construction equipment, and agricultural equipment. Some electric off-road equipment has lower upfront costs than combustion off-road equipment, whilst other electric off-road equipment has significantly higher upfront costs. For example, a battery- powered leaf blower has an average cost of $137 and a gas leaf blower has an average cost of $206. An electric forklift cost varies between $20,000 and $45,000, with the additional cost of a battery and charger, while an internal combustion forklift cost varies between $20,000 and $50,000. In many cases the upfront cost of electric large construction and agricultural equipment is higher than combustion options. However, generally, the operational and maintenance costs of combustion off-road equipment are higher than electric alternatives.

Electric off-road equipment such as tractors and forklifts often require additional charging equipment which poses an additional upfront cost to the owner.

Sources:

1. Lawn Starter. Pricing Guide. https://www.lawnstarter.com/blog/cost/leaf-blower-price/. Accessed August 2022.

2. Toyota Forklifts. Forklift Pricing 101. https://www.toyotaforklift.com/resource-library/material-handling- solutions/finance/forklift-pricing-101-what-you-should-know. Accessed August 2022.

Measure T-7: Increase municipal passenger zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) adoption to 75% by 2030 and 100% by 2045 and decarbonize emergency and heavy-duty vehicles as feasible.

City Costs High Cost
City Cost Variables - Cost of Zero-Emission Fleet Conversion and Purchase Policy Development - Staff time to manage feasibility studies
- Staff time to procure funding (i.e., grant management from CARB) City Cost Discussion Establishing a Zero-Emission Fleet Conversion and Purchase Policy that includes replacement schedule will require staff time, however the additional costs are not significant as this policy supports existing Policy N.R-2.9 for City purchase of zero-emission vehicles.

Hayward CAP Update
GHG Measures Cost Ranges

The most significant cost to the City in meeting this measure will be determined by the number of EV/ZEV chargers needed to meet the City’s transition goals and any additional ZEV infrastructure determined through the conversion plan. Upfront costs of implementing the transition will be high. As an example, the cost of Level 2 charging station is $5,000 to $10,000 and cost of electricity over an eight-year period is $4,000.1 Disregarding the future costs to purchase charging infrastructure, the costs are low for this measure.

Community Cost Low Cost
Community Costs
Variables
- Cost associated with funding mechanism, e.g. sales tax or parcel tax Community Costs
Discussion
Community costs may include potential funding mechanisms for this investment, such as a parcel tax, sales tax, and more. The City, however, may opt to utilize grant funding or other funding mechanisms to pay for costs associated with decarbonizing the municipal fleet.

Notes

1. Cost of Level 2 charging station are average. Assumes 100,000 miles traveled over 8-year period. Maintenance costs include insurance, routine service and engine wear. Electric prices based on July 2019 average for LA-Long Beach-Anaheim. Electricity and maintenance may vary. San Francisco Department of Environment Services; Bureau of Labor Statistics

Measure SW-1: Implement and enforce SB 1383 requirements to reduce communitywide landfilled organics by 75% by 2030 and 90% by 2045.

City Costs Moderate Cost
City Cost
Variables
- Staff time to produce collateral for educational programs and engagements - Staff time to adopt an ordinance
- Staff time to manage programs and policies
- Cost of compost bins and food waste containers
City Cost
Discussion
The primary cost variable for this measure is time. Enforcing a fee for incorrectly sorted materials as well as implementing a monitoring and quality control program will be ongoing costs to the City, including the time to vet existing vendors’ practices.

City staff will also need to dedicate additional time to manage and oversee the various partnerships outlined to reduce landfill organics to create diversion and prevention programs, investigate funding opportunity for food recovery, and conduct feasibility studies. Additional policy work required includes adopting procurement policies in compliance with SB 1383. The City will also incur costs in providing free outdoor compost bins and kitchen-top food waste containers to low-income communities of colors and elderly households.

Example estimate costs of outdoor waste, compost, and recycling receptables are as follows:2 ▪ Outdoor waste receptacles – landfill, recycling & compost: $1,750 - $4,000 ▪ Outdoor waste receptables – regular/single stream: $660 - $970 Community Cost Moderate Cost
Community Costs
Variables
- Cost to implement composting at home
- Cost to businesses to implement composting
- Cost of businesses to implement waste diversion techniques Hayward CAP Update
GHG Measures Cost Ranges

Community Costs
Discussion
To satisfy the requirement of SB 1383, Cal Recycle estimates the cost to the community to be $17 per household per year after full implementation, and $662 annually for small businesses.1 However, the costs for individuals will vary significantly, as the cost is dependent on the amount of waste that is currently disposed and the ability of the business to reduce the amount of organic disposal.

1. CalRecycle. 2020. Proposed Regulation for Short-Lived Climate Pollutants: Organic Waste Methane Emissions. https://www.dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Economics/Major_Regulations/Major_Regulations_Table/documents/Final_Sria_11- 16%20.pdf#search=%22SB%201383%20Economic%20Analysis%22. Accessed August 2022

2. Based on current market sales from select vendors: Trashcan Warehouse and Waste360. Accessed August 2022

Measure SW-2: Increase communitywide overall landfill diversion of waste to 75% by 2030 and 85% by 2045.

City Costs Moderate Cost
City Cost Variables - Staff time to update and adopt an ordinance - Staff time to produce collateral for educational programs and engagements - Staff time to develop Zero Waste Strategic Plant
- Cost of re-routing collected landfill waste hauling to Material Recovery Facility

City Cost Discussion City time will be required to complete policy actions that increase communitywide landfill diversion that include adopting a Waste Diversion Ordinance, updating municipal codes and hauling agreements to reflect recent legislation, creating waste management requirements for large events, establishing a post-consumer recycled content requirement, and increasing bans on “problem materials”.

The development of a Zero-Waste Strategic Plan will also require significant initial staff time, though it will inform subsequent actions in meeting the target. These actions require numerous partnerships and exploration of funding opportunities, which may require additional time to oversee.

Staff will also need to oversee the implementation of a single-use food ware fee. The City may also incur a cost in re-routing collected landfill waste to a Materials Recovery Facility (MRF).

Community Cost Moderate Cost
Community Costs
Variables
- Cost to implement composting at home
- Cost to businesses to implement composting
- Increased cost of food items served in reusable/compostable food ware - Cost to businesses to implement waste diversion techniques

Community Costs
Discussion
Community costs associated with organic waste diversion are explained in the community costs discussion for Measure SW-1. Community costs are moderate while providing beneficial emission reductions to the City. Ordinances are known to be an effective means to influence consumer behavior. For example, after the passing of the 2013 Alameda County Reusable Bag Ordinance, which charged $0.10/bag, bag purchases by affected retail stores declined 85%.1 For businesses, costs include the marginal cost of providing compostable foodware compared to the cost of foodware already in practice. In Alameda County, the Rethink Disposable program, in partnership with StopWaste, demonstrated that several businesses that voluntarily minimized single-use foodware saw net cost savings of $1,000 to -$22,000 per year.2 Developers may see additional operating costs associated with the separation of waste for proper reuse and recycling for better rates of waste diversion and consumers may see variable cost increases to food items as a result of these food items being provided in new compostable foodware.

Hayward CAP Update
GHG Measures Cost Ranges

Sources:

1. City of Berkeley Zero Waste Department. 2020. Passing a Single-Use Foodware and Litter Reduction Ordinance in Berkeley, CA. Accessed at https://zwconference.org/wp-content/uploads/presentations/nrc-nzwc_detournay_c.pdf. Accessed August 2022

2. City of Berkeley. 2018. Single Use Disposable Foodware and Litter Reduction Ordinance. Accessed at https://ecologycenter.org/wp- content/uploads/2018/11/Disposable-Free-Dining-Ordinance.pdf. Accessed August 2022

Measure WW-1: Reduce water consumption by 15% by 2030 and maintain it through 2045.

City Costs Moderate Cost
City Cost Variables - Staff time to produce collateral for educational programs and engagements - Recycled Water Plan Development

City Cost Discussion To implement this measure, the City will need to dedicate staff to overseeing numerous engagement and partnership efforts to continue and implement water conservation and water recycling programs. Managing numerous engagements to oversee feasibility studies and work with community stakeholders may be an added cost. A city authored Recycled Water Master Plan, while requiring significant staff time to create, will serve as a useful roadmap in overseeing these engagement and partnership efforts.

Community Cost Low Cost
Community Costs
Variables
- Cost of water conservation efforts
- On-bill water savings

Community Costs
Discussion
Decreasing water consumption directly leads to lower water bills for the community. Community costs may include investment into water conservation practices such as a City high water efficient washer rebate or lawn conservation rebate. Incentives provided to the community by the City lead to relatively fast returns in water savings and water bill savings long-term. Some outdoor watering conservation practices may reduce bills by 50%.1

Notes:

1. The City of Mountain View estimated that the costs associated with a water conservation program that included outreach and technical assistance would be equivalent to 80% to 100% FTE.

Source: EPA. 2022. WaterSense. https://www.epa.gov/watersense/start-saving. Accessed August 2022.

Measure CS-1: Increase carbon sequestration by planting and maintaining 1,000 new trees annually through 2030 to sequester carbon and create urban shade to reduce heat island effect.

City Costs Moderate Cost
City Cost Variables - Staff time to update an ordinance - Staff time to manage programs and policies
- Staff time to procure funding
- Cost of tree maintenance
- Staff cost to develop Hayward Urban Forest Management Plant City Cost Discussion Policy actions for this measure include expanding Hayward Street Tree Ordinance, updating Hayward Tree Preservation Ordinance, adopting policy and practices for expanding tree canopy, creating cool roof requirements, and creating a code to preserve trees on homeowners’ land, which will need to be adopted by the City.

Hayward CAP Update
GHG Measures Cost Ranges

The City will incur capital costs in increasing the tree canopy through planting and maintenance.

Tree care activities include pest management, watering, pruning, and removal when necessary.

Annual maintenance costs for urban street trees are estimated below. Cost estimates are based on a nationwide survey of municipal in-house budgets for street tree maintenance and the associated number of street trees with each tree care activity.1
▪ Tree Pest Management (Per tree per year): $36
▪ Tree Watering (Per tree per year): $62
▪ Tree Pruning (Per tree per year): $139
▪ Tree Removal (Per tree per year): $368
There are examples of municipal tree pruning and maintenance costs/tree planting partnerships.1 City staff will also need to dedicate time to implement and enforce the tree removal in-lieu fee and oversee both the tree planting and adopt-a-tree program, and manage the Tree Trust or Fund established for this measure. Lastly, City staff will need time to explore grant funding for tree planting (anticipated as 1 FTE).

Community Cost Moderate Cost
Community Costs
Variables
- Cost of trees
- Cost of water/maintenance of trees
Community Costs
Discussion
Community members may incur costs associated with planting trees, conducting maintenance and watering over time. The cost of planting a new tree varies between $150 to $3,000 depending on variety factors including size, species, location, labor costs, equipment costs, and permit or inspection fees.2 City programs may provide incentives or subsidies for residents to plant and/or maintain trees. Watering and other maintenance is likely to be minimal (a few dollars a summer) while trimming costs may increase in the future once the tree is larger. Co-benefits of carbon sequestration projects to the community include more open spaces, savings on electricity bills if trees help shade your home, more greenery in the surrounding environment, and enhanced climate resiliency against natural disasters, like flooding, urban wildfires, and drought, improving the overall health and well-being of the community.

Notes:

1. The City of Claremont contracts with West Coast Arborist for pruning and other maintenance and pays $67 (2016) per tree for pruning services. The San Francisco Department of Public Works has partnered with a nonprofit, Friends of Urban Forest (FUF), to manage tree planting and establishment. The municipal government provides FUF with 60% of their annual revenue. The Department of Public Works manages a municipal program that aims to take the burden of maintenance off of property owners.

Sources:

1. Based on the Urban Forest Management information from San Mateo County. Accessed August 2022

2. Bob Villa. How Much Does it cost to Plant a Tree? 2022. https://www.bobvila.com/articles/cost-to-plant-a-tree/. Accessed August 2022.

Measure CS-2: Increase carbon sequestration by applying 0.08 tons of compost per capita annually in the community through 2030 and 2045.

City Costs Low Cost
City Cost Variables - Staff time to produce collateral for educational programs - Cost of collateral materials
- Staff time to enforce policy compliance
City Cost Discussion City staff will need time to complete actions towards this measure. A lower cost to the City includes time needed to adopt procurement requirements of SB 1383 and distribute educational materials regarding compost. Greater costs to the City include time to develop and adopt urban park guidelines, implementation of shoreline master plan. Enforcing compliance with SB 1383 by establishing a minimum level of annual compost application would be the greatest requirement and may require applying outside City.

Hayward CAP Update
GHG Measures Cost Ranges

Community Cost No expected community costs
Community Costs
Variables
No expected community costs
Community Costs
Discussion
There are no expected community costs associated with the City applying compost in the community to sequester carbon.

Conclusion Summary
A summary of estimated City and community cost range for each measure is shown in the table below.

For building energy and transportation measures, there’s a low to high community cost range. For waste measures there’s a moderate community cost range. For water/wastewater and carbon sequestration measures, there’s a low community cost range.

ID # Measure City Cost Range Community Cost Range
Building Energy
BE-1
Continue the all-electric requirement for new residential construction.

Adopt an all-electric requirement for new non-residential construction to take effect by 2026.

Moderate Moderate
BE-2 Electrify existing single-family residential buildings in order to achieve 100 therms/person/year by 2030 and 0 therms/person in 2045.

High High
BE-3
Decarbonize existing commercial and multi-family buildings in order to achieve 53 therms per service person in 2030 and 0 therms per service person in 2045.

High Moderate
BE 4 Support Ava Community Energy in providing 100% carbon-free electricity by 2030.

Moderate Low
BE 5 Continue to promote energy efficiency improvement, in alignment with the existing the 2014 Climate Action Plan.

Moderate Low
BE-6 Generate carbon-neutral electricity on City facilities meeting 80% of the municipal operational electricity needs by 2030.

Moderate Low
Transportation
T-1 Increase active transportation mode share to 15% by 2030 and to 20% by 2045.

High Low
T-2 Implement public and shared transit programs to increase mode shift to public and shared transit mode to 15% by 2030 and 30% by 2045.

High Low
T-3
Develop disincentives for driving single passenger vehicles to support the bicycle/pedestrian and public transit mode share goals of Measures T-1 and T-2.

Low Moderate
T-4 Increase passenger zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) adoption to 15% by 2030 and 50% by 2045
Moderate Moderate
T-5 Increase zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) adoption by businesses to 10% by 2030 and 80% by 2045.

Low Moderate
T-6 Transition 15% of off-road equipment to zero-emission by 2030 and 80% by 2045.

Moderate Moderate
T-7
Increase municipal passenger zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) adoption to 75% by 2030 and 100% by 2045 and decarbonize emergency and heavy-duty vehicles as feasible.

High Low
Waste
Hayward CAP Update
GHG Measures Cost Ranges

SW-1 Implement and enforce SB 1383 requirements to reduce communitywide landfilled organics by 75% by 2030 and 90% by 2045.

Moderate Moderate
SW-2
Increase communitywide overall landfill diversion of waste to 75% by 2030 and 85% by 2045. Reduce water consumption by 15% by 2030 and maintain it through 2045.

Moderate Moderate
Water and Wastewater
WW-
1 Reduce water consumption by 15% by 2030 and maintain it through 2045.

Moderate Low
Carbon Sequestration
CS-1
Increase carbon sequestration by planting and maintaining 1,000 new trees annually through 2030 to sequester carbon and create urban shade to reduce heat island effect.

Moderate Low
CS-2 Increase carbon sequestration by applying 0.08 tons of compost per capita annually in the community through 2030 and 2045.

Low Low

Given the number of the GHG measures contemplated by the City of Hayward for the CAP Update that involve creation and enforcement of new building codes, the City is anticipated to need additional staff, particularly in the Development Services department. The City is also likely to need resources to design educational and outreach programs, adding to the need for staff with skills in community and stakeholder engagement. Key departments responsible for interface with stakeholders such as the public and partner organizations such as the City Manager’s Office, Communications and Media Relation division, Information Technology, among others will likely see an increase in staff costs. Select subject matter experts, such as the Environmental Services and Code Enforcement divisions, will be required to provide insights in collateral material associated with these programs. Additional outreach and engagement efforts may cost up to $0.84 per communication depending on the type of outreach.3 While GHG measures proposed as part of the CAP Update (such as those related to off-road City-owned equipment) will require some capital investment, the City’s budget and capital improvement plans are not expected to be significantly affected within the near-term (next 5 years) timeframe of the CAP Update.

Community costs are expected to be the highest for building electrification and decarbonization measures, which, depending on the measure, require notable capital investments and pose lifecycle costs associated with energy bills (BE-1, BE-2, and BE-3). Additionally, the community may face significant upfront costs associated with procurement of new decarbonized vehicles and equipment (T-4, T-6, and T-7). They may also face ongoing costs from future single passenger driving disincentive programs and mechanisms (T-3).

Measures that aim to reduce City operational GHG emissions pose low costs to the community as the community is not likely to bear a cost burden associated with implementing these measures.

3 Email (per household) cost: $0.00 - $0.01; Direct Mail (per household) cost: $0.60 - $0.66; Phone Call (per household) cost: $0.74 - $0.83

July 2014 Page | 3-135
POLICY DOCUMENT : PART 3

HAZARDS ELEMENT
The city of Hayward is located in a region that is prone to a variety of natural disasters. The city’s geologic setting was formed by regional and local earthquake faults, many of which are still active and can generate devastating damage to buildings and infr astructure in the event of an earthquake. The city’s climate can also create hazardous conditions. Severe winter and spring storms can cause landslides in hillside areas and flooding along stream corridors and low -lying areas near the San Francisco Bay. D ry weather during spring and summer months can create hazardous conditions related to wildland fires, which when combined with strong Diablo winds, pose a significant risk to hillside neighborhoods. Climate change is projected to increase the frequency and severity of climate hazards, including increased flood, landslide, drought, extreme heat, and wildfire risks. In addition to natural hazards, Hayward also has a number of transportation facilities and industrial businesses that create risks for man-made hazards, such as aircraft accidents, hazardous material spills, and exposure to excessive noise.

While it is impossible to completely avoid natural and man- made hazards, the Hazards Element establishes goals and policies to protect life and minimize property damage during future disasters and emergencies. The goals and policies address regional hazards mitigation, seismic and geologic hazards, climate change, flood hazards, rising sea levels, wildland wildfires, hazardous materials, airport hazards, and noise.

Several other Elements of the General Plan provide supporting goals and policies that will help the Hayward community prepare for and respond to hazards, including the Community Safety Element, the Natural Resources Element, Public Facilities Element, Environmental Justice Element, the Climate Action Plan, and the Community Health and Quality of Life Element.

General Plan
City of Hayward Policy Document

Page | 3-136 July 2014

Goal 1 Regional Coordination
The impacts of disasters are rarely confined to the
limits of a single jurisdiction , and almost always
affect multiple agencies within a region. As a result, the Federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000
encourages cooperation between State , regional,
and local agencies, prompting them to work
together t o mitigate hazards. This goal and its
supporting policies are designed to promote a
disaster-resilient region through regional
coordination and mitigation planning . This is
accomplished by implementing a Local Hazards
Mitigation Plan , a comprehensive pla n that
addresses local hazards in coordination with state
and regional agencies. By participating in regional
and local hazards mitigation, the City will minimize
disaster risks and improve the safety of the
Hayward community.

GOAL HAZ-1
Promote a disaster-resilient region by reducing
hazard risks through regional coordination and
mitigation planning including climate change
adaptation. [Source: Existing Goal , City Staff]
HAZ-1.1 Local Hazards Mitigation Plan
The City shall coordinate with regional and local
agencies to implement an updated Resiliency Plan
(former Local Hazard s Mitigation Plan ). [Source:

Existing Policy modified; City Staff] (IGC/MPSP)
HAZ-1.2 Plan Implementation and
Monitoring
The City shall monitor and evaluate the success of
the Resiliency Plan ( Local Hazards Mitigation
Plan). The City shall ensure that strategies are
prioritized and implemented through the Capital
Improvement Program and by providing adequate
budget for on -going programs and Department
operations. [Source: Existing Policy modified; City Staff] (MPSP/CSO/FB)
HAZ-1.3 Plan Updates
The City shall support the Association of Bay Area
Governments (ABAG) in its role as the lead agency
that prepares and updates the Multi-Jurisdictional
Local Hazards Mitigation Plan. If ABAG cannot
fulfill this role in the future, the City shall
coordinate with Alameda Cou nty and other local
agencies to encourage the development and
implementation of a new Multi-Jurisdictional Local
Hazards Mitigation Plan. Ensure all future plan
updates include climate change adaptation
measures. [Source: Existing Policy modified; City Staff] (IGC)

Photographs showing damage from the 1868 Hayward
Earthquake. Courtesy of the Hayward Area Historical Society.

General Plan
Policy Document
Hazards

July 2014 Page | 3-137
Goal 2 Seismic and Geologic
Hazards
Hayward is located in a seismically active region
that contains several major active faults, including
the San Andreas Fault , Hayward Fault , and
Calaveras Fault . The Hay ward Fault crosses
through the c ity and generally runs parallel and
within a few hundred feet of Mission Boulevard .

Other potentially active faults within Hayward
include the Chabot Fault, the Carlos Bee Fault, and
several adjacent and secondary faults . As a result
of its location and geologic setting, the city of
Hayward is subject to a variety of seismic and
geologic hazards, including fault rupture, strong
ground shaking, liquefaction, and landslides. In
addition, segments of the city could flood if an
earthquake generates a tsunami or causes an up -
stream dam to fail . This goal and its supporting
policies are designed to minimize risks associated
with seismic and geologic hazards.

GOAL HAZ-2
Protect life and minimize property damage
from potentia l seismic and geologic hazards .
[Source: Existing Goal, modified ]
HAZ-2.1 Seismic Safety Codes and
Provisions
The City shall enforce the seismic safety provisions
of the Building Code and Alquist -Priolo Special
Studies Zone Act to minimize earthquake -related
hazards in new construction, particularly as they
relate to high occupancy structures or buildings
taller than 50 feet in height. [Source: Existing Policy] (RDR)
HAZ-2.2 Geologic Investigations
The City shall require a geologic investigation for
new construction on sites within (or partially
within) the following zones:
 Fault Zone (see Figure 9.2 -1 in the
Hazards Background Report)
 Liquefaction Zone (see Figure 9.2-2 in the
Hazards Background Report)
 Landslide Zone (see Figure 9.2 -3 in the
Hazards Background Report)
A licensed geotechnical engineer shall conduct the
investigation and prepare a written report of
findings and recommended mitigation measures to
minimize potential risks related to seismic and
geologic hazards. [Source: Existing Policy; City Staff, GPUTF] (RDR)

SEISMIC HAZARD TERMINOLOGY

Fault Zone: Zones in which cities and
counties must require special geologic studies
to prevent the construction of structures
intended for human occupancy over an
earthquake fault. The California Geological
Survey publishes maps of the zones as part of
its work to implement the requirements of the
Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone Act. These
maps show the most comprehensive depiction
of fault traces that can rupture during an
earthquake.

Liquefaction: Liquefaction happens when
loosely packed sandy or silty materials
saturated with water are shaken hard enough to
lose strength and stiffness. Liquefied soils
behave like a liquid and are responsible for
tremendous damage in an earthquake, causing
pipes to leak, roads and airport runways to
buckle, and building foundations to be
damaged.

Tsunami: A tsunami (pronounced soo-nah-
mee) is a series of waves generated in a body of
water by a rapid disturbance that vertically
displaces the water. These changes can be
caused by an underwater fault rupture (that
generates an earthquake) or underwater
landslides (typically triggered by earthquakes).

General Plan
City of Hayward Policy Document

Page | 3-138 July 2014

HAZ-2.3 Fault Zones Assumption
The City shall assume that all sites within (or
partially within) any fault zone are underlain by an
active fault trace until a geotechnical investigation
by a licensed geotechnical engineer proves
otherwise. [Source: Existing Policy] (RDR)

Active Fault Zones in the San Francisco bay Area. Source:

Association of Bay Area Governments.

HAZ-2.4 New Buildings in a Fault Zone
The City shall prohibit the placement of any
building designed for human occupancy overactive
faults. All buildings shall be set back from active
faults by at least 50 feet or as recommended by a
licensed geotechnical engineer based on a site and
project specific evaluation . [Source: Existing Policy, modified] (RDR)
HAZ-2.5 Existing Buildings in a Fault Zone
The City shall prohibit the expansion of existing
commercial and multi -family buildings
(constructed prior to the adoption of the Alquist-
Priolo Special Studies Zone Act) that are located
over an active fault. Renovations to existing
buildings within a fault zone shall be subject to the
limitations and requirements of the Alquist -Priolo
Special Studies Zone Act. [Source: Existing Policy,
modified; City Staff] (RDR)
HAZ-2.6 Infrastructure and Utilities
The City shall require infrastructure and utility lines that cross faults to include design features to
mitigate potential fault displacement impacts and
restore service in the event of major fault
displacement. Mitigation measures may include
plans for damage isolation or temporary bypass by
using standard isol ation valves , flexible hose or
conduit, and other techniques and equipment .
[Source: Existing policy] (RDR)

Potential severity of ground shaking in the Bay Area during a magnitude 6.9 earthquake on the Hayward Fault. Areas in red would experience very strong to very violent ground shaking.

Source: Association of Bay Area Governments.

General Plan
Policy Document
Hazards

July 2014 Page | 3-139
HAZ-2.7 Dam Failure
The City shall coordinate with agencies responsible
for the maintenance of the South Reservoir Dam,
the Del Valle Dam, and other small dams along
Alameda Creek to ensure that dam infrastructure is
maintained and enhanced to withstand potential
failure during an earthquake. [Source: Existing Policy, City Staff] (IGC)
HAZ-2.8 Tsunamis
The City shall coordinate with the Hayward Area
Recreation and Park District (HARD), the East Bay
Regional Parks District (EBRPD), and the Alameda
County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District to efficiently evacuate shoreline parks
during and prior to potential tsunami events with
consideration to sea level rise increasing tsunami
impact. [Source: Existing Policy modified, City Staff]
(CSO/MPSP/IGC)
HAZ-2.9 Seismic Retrofits
The City shall encourage property owners to
upgrade buildings for seismic safety purposes ,
especially masonry and soft- story buildings (i.e.,
buildings designed with minimal bracing on the
first floor) . [Source: Existing Policy, City Staff;
GPUTF; Public] (MPSP/PI)
HAZ-2.10 City Facilities
The City shall strive to seismically upgrade existing
City facilities that do not meet current building
code standards. Where upgrades are not
economically feasible, the City shall consider the
relocation and/or reconstruction of facilities.
[Source: Existing Policy; City Staff] (PI/CSO)
HAZ-2.11 Critical Facilities
The City shall encourage seismic upgrades to
hospitals, schools, long-term care facilities , and
other important facilities that do not meet current
building code standards. Where upgrades are not
economically feasible, the City shall encourage the
relocation and/or reconstruction of facilities.
[Source: Existing Policy; City Staff] (PI/CSO)
HAZ-2.12 Public Awareness
The City shall promote greater public awareness of
earthquake hazards and promote resources and
programs to help property owners make their
homes and businesses more seismically safe.
[Source: Existing Policy] (PI)
Goal 3 Flood Hazards
Various parts of Hayward are subject to flooding
during major storm events , including shoreline
areas and upland areas located along stream s,
creeks, and drainage ways . The geographic extent
of local f lood hazards is anticipated to increase in
the next century as a result of rising sea levels
caused by climate change . Extreme weather
conditions caused by climate change could also
increase flooding risks during major storms. Parts
of Hayward are also located in dam failure
inundation zones. Dam failure refers to the
uncontrolled release of impounded water stored
behind a dam. It can be caused by heavy rainfall,
earthquakes, la ndslides, improper operation or
maintenance, poor construction or maintenance,
vandalism, and other natural or human actions.

This goal and its supporting policies are designed
to minimize damage and risks associated with flood
hazards, including flood ha zards associated with
extreme weather caused by climate change and dam
failure. Related policies that address rising sea levels are discussed under Goal 4.

General Plan
City of Hayward Policy Document

Page | 3-140 July 2014

GOAL HAZ-3
Protect life and minimize property damage
from potential flood hazards . [Source:

Existing Goal; GPUTF; Public; CC/PC ]
HAZ-3.1 FEMA Coordination
The City shall coordinate with the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to
ensure that Federal Insurance Rate Maps correctly
depict flood hazards in the city . [Source: Existing
Policy] (IGC)
HAZ-3.2 Development in Floodplains
The City shall implement F ederal, State, and local
requirements related to new construction in flood
plain areas to ensure that future flood risks to life
and property are minimized. [Source: Existing Policy]
(RDR)
HAZ-3.3 Flood Plain Management
Ordinance
The City shall maintain and enforce a Flood Plain
Management Ordinance to:
 Promote public health, safety, and general
welfare by minimizing public and private
losses due to floods,
 Implement the Cobey-Alquist Flood Plain
Management Act,
 Comply with the eligibility requirements of
the National Flood Insurance Program,
and
Protect assets within flood zones from increased
extreme precipitation events as identified in the
Climate Vulnerability Assessment (Appendix A to
this Element ). [Source: Existing Policy modified; City Staff] (MPSP/RDR)

HAZ-3.4 Changing Flood Conditions
Associated with Climate Change
The City shall coordinate with the Alameda County
Flood Control and Water Conservation District to
evaluate the need to expand the capacity of flood
control facilities based on changing flood
conditions associated with climate change and
extreme weather . [Source: Existing Policy, modified]
(IGC)
HAZ-3.5 Public Awareness
The City shall promote greater public awareness of
flooding hazards and promote resources and
programs to help property owners and landlords
protect their homes and businesses from flood
damage. [Source: Existing Policy modified; City Staff ] (PI)

General Plan
Policy Document
Hazards

July 2014 Page | 3-141

Areas of Hayward that are subject to flooding during a 100-year storm (light blue), and a 500-year storm (light orange). Source: FEMA

General Plan
City of Hayward Policy Document

Page | 3-142 July 2014

Areas of Hayward that are located in the dam failure inundation zone are shown in blue. Source: California Department of Water Resources

General Plan
Policy Document
Hazards

July 2014 Page | 3-143
Goal 4 Rising Sea Levels
Sea levels are projected to rise by up to 1.9 feet by
mid-century (See the Climate Vulnerability
Assessment in Appendix A). As sea levels rise, the
Hayward shoreline, as well as industrial,
commercial, and residential areas along creeks and
drainage ways, will become more and more
vulnerable to water inundation during both normal
high tides and flooding during major storm events.

If unmitigated, rising sea levels have the potential
to inundate the open space and recreational
resources along the shoreline, and flood nearby
industrial, commercial, and residential areas. This
goal and its supporting policies are designed to
protect the Hayward shoreline and adjacent urban
uses from the impacts of rising sea levels.

The maps below outline mid and end -century sea
level rise projections that display areas with marine
inundation under the separate scenarios. The first
map displays these scenarios outright while the
following shows these scenarios under a 100 -year
or 1 percent chance storm overlaid. The final map
following this section displays groundwater hazard
risk with water table at surface and up to 3.3 feet by
mid-century. Projections in the maps are consistent
with best available science but maintain a high
degree of uncertainty.

Policies related to climate change and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions are provided in the Natural
Resources Element, Mobility Element, and Climate Action Plan.

GOAL HAZ-4
Safeguard the Hayward shoreline, open space,
recreational resources, and urban uses from
flooding due to rising sea levels . [Source:

Exisring Goal; Public ; GPUT F, CC/PC ].

HAZ-4.1 Monitor Rising Sea Level
The City shall monitor information from regional,
State, and F ederal agencies on rising sea levels in
the San Francisco Bay to determine if additional
adaptation strategies should be implemented to
address flooding hazards. [Source: Existing Policy; City Staff] (IGC/CSO)
HAZ-4.2 Regional Planning for Sea Level
Rise
The City shall continue to coordinate with the Bay
Conservation and Development Commission,
Alameda County, and others to participate in Bay
Adapt: Regional Strategy for a Rising Bay and similar
efforts, to advance regional dialogue on
mechanisms for balancing the protection of at-risk
communities and enhanc ing the region’s overall
resilience to rising sea levels. [Source: Existing Policy modified; City Staff; Hayward Area Shoreline Adaptation Master Plan] (IGC)
HAZ-4.3 Shoreline Adaptation Master Plan
The City shall coordinate with Oakland, San
Leandro, Alameda County , the Hayward Area
Shoreline Planning Agency, the Bay Conservation
and Development Commission, and other agencies
to expand and restore wetland habitat and increase
shoreline resilience through the implementation of
the Hayward Regional Shoreline Adaptation Master
Plan. [Source: Existing Policy modified; City Staff;
GPUTF] (IGC)
HAZ-4.4 FIRM Maps
The City shall cooperate with FEMA in the
preparation of updated Flood Insurance Rate Maps
that reflect rising sea levels and changing flood
General Plan
City of Hayward Policy Document

Page | 3-144 July 2014

conditions. [Source: Existing Policy modified; City Staff] (RDR)
HAZ-4.5 Rising Sea Level Notifications
The City shall require that all applicants for new
industrial and commercial development, including
major remodels, within areas which may flood due
to sea level rise by the end of the century during a
100 year flood event, notify residents, tenants and
property owners about the risk of future sea level
rise and groundwater hazard risk . When maps are
updated, the City shall provide notice to all
potentially impacted residents, tenants, property
and business owners about updated data related to
rising sea levels and flooding. [Source: Existing Policy modified, City Staff; GPUTF] (RDR)
HAZ-4.6 Adaptation Atlas
The City shall partner with regional jurisdictions to
incorporate the findings of the San Francisco
Estuary Institute’s SF Bay Area Adaptation Atlas.
including commitments to nature-based measures,
grey infrastructure, policy and regulatory measures,
and financial measures [Source: New Policy)
HAZ-4.7 Adaptation Programs and
Standards
The City shall investigate opportunities to provide
programs and funding resources to retrofit and
adapt critical facilities, community structures , and
infrastructure through:
 Raising buildings and roads by placing fill to
rebuild the grades at higher elevations,
 Rebuilding all connecting roads, trails, and
utilities to slope up to the new grade
determined based on projected sea-level rise,
 Requiring adaptive management plans for
restoration/mitigation sites within projected
sea-level rise hazard zones to consider
increased flooding and erosion potential,
 Installing nature based and grey infrastructure
around areas projected to be impacted by sea
level rise. [Source: New Policy)
HAZ-4.8 Vulnerable Communities
The City shall prepare a sea level rise adaptation
plan to iden tify strategies to increase resilience of
Glen Eden, Eden Shore, and Russel l City
communities with prioritization of vulnerable
populations. Include outreach to affected
communities that is accessible in multiple formats
and in multiple languages.[Source: New Policy)
HAZ-4.9 Groundwater Management Plan
The City shall coordinate with Alameda County
Flood Control & Water Conservation District to
develop a Shallow Groundwater Management Plan
to identify feasible strategies for managing rising
groundwater tables from sea level rise and storm
surges. [Source: New Policy, Hayward Area Shoreline
Adaptation Master Plan]
HAZ-4.10 Increase Flood Protection
Standards for New Construction
and Renovations
The Ci ty shall incorporate sea level rise into the
municipal code to require compliance with base
floor elevation and flood -proofing requirement to
mid-century sea levels. Consider unconventional
design elements that may allow structure s to
accommodate a higher water table and higher
liquefaction risks. [Source: New Policy ][Source:

Hayward Area Shoreline Adaptation Master Plan]
HAZ-4.12 Develop Technical Support and
Education
The City shall develop technical support and
education to help businesses and residents
understand risks from sea level rise and develop
mitigation actions [Source: New Policy, Hayward Area
Shoreline Adaptation Master Plan]
General Plan
Policy Document
Hazards

July 2014 Page | 3-145
HAZ-4.10 Essential Facilities Siting
Locate, when feasible, new essential public
facilities, including hospitals and health care
facilities, emergency shelters, fire stations,
emergency command centers, and emergency
communications facilities, outside of flood hazard
zones. [Source: New Policy]
General Plan
City of Hayward Policy Document

Page | 3-146 July 2014

Areas of Hayward that are subject to sea level rise with a mid-century rise of 1.9 feet (blue gradient) and an end century rise of 6.9 feet (green gradient with a 100 year storm. Source: Adapting to Rising Tides

General Plan
Policy Document
Hazards

July 2014 Page | 3-147

Areas of Hayward that are subject to sea level rise with a mid-century rise of 1.9 feet (blue gradient) and an end century rise of 6.9 feet (green gradient with a 100 year storm. Source: Adapting to Rising Tides

General Plan
City of Hayward Policy Document

Page | 3-148 July 2014

Areas of Hayward that are subject to groundwater risk with a mid-century sea level rise of 1.9 feet showing new depths of groundwater from marine inundation to 0-3.3 feet below ground surface. Source: USGS Groundwater Risk Tool

General Plan
Policy Document
Hazards

July 2014 Page | 3-149
Goal 5 Urban Wildfire Hazards
The foothill neighborhoods of Hayward are located
adjacent to natural hillsides and open space areas
that are prone to wildfires. This goal and its
supporting policies are designed to minimize urban
wildfire risks through the implementation of
wildland/urban interface guidelines, fire
prevention codes, and open space management
practices that reduce the potential for wildfires. Fire hazards zones are mapped in the figure below this
section showing both high and very high hazard
severity zones (VHFHSZ) located to the northeast
and southeast of Hayward with none directly in city
limits.

Measures in the California Building Code reduce
fire hazards in structures. These include use of
specific building construction materials, fire
separation walls, building separation, and use of fire
sprinklers. Included in development regulations are
requirements for minimum road widths that
provide adequate access for firefighting equipment
and evacuation of residents, as well as clearance
around structures (fuel modification areas) to
prevent the rapid spread of fire.

Water availability and peak load water supply are
essential in combating wildfires. Peak load water
supply refers to the supply of water to meet both
domestic water and fire -fighting needs during the
particular season and time of day when domestic
water demand on a water system is at its peak. As
development occurs, peak load water supply
reserves must be increased. The City of Hayward
and East Bay Municipal Utility District, the City’s
water providers, must ens ure peak load water
supply requirements are met.

GOAL HAZ-5
Protect life and minimize potential property
damage from urban wildfire hazards in hillside
areas. [Source: Existing Goal, modified ]
HAZ-5.1 Wildland/Urban Interface
Guidelines
The City shall maintain and implement
Wildland/Urban Interface Guidelines for new and
existing development within neighborhoods that
are proximal to existing f ire hazard areas. [Source:

Existing Policy, modified] (MPSP/RDR)
HAZ-5.2 Fire Prevention Codes
The City shall enforce fire prevention codes that
require property owners to reduce wildfire hazards
on their property including vegetation management
and fire-resistant material retrofits in
neighborhoods proximal to fire hazard severity
zones. [Source: Existing Policy, modified] (CSO/RDR)
HAZ-5.3 Defensible Space and Fuel
Reduction
The City shall enforce defensible space criteria and
assist property owners in removing overgrown
vegetation and to reduce fuel loads on hillside
properties in neighborhoods proximal to fire
hazard severity zones , especially near structures
and homes. [Source: Existing Policy, modified ]
(PI/JP/IGC/RDR)
HAZ-5.4 Grant Funding
The City shall seek grant funding to mitigate
potential wildfire threats to the community and to
implement special training workshops and projects
related to defensible space and fuel reduction
practices. [Source: Existing Policy] (CSO)
HAZ-5.5 Park District Coordination
The City shall coordinate with the East Bay
Regional Park District and the Hayward Area
Recreation and Park District to promote forestry
and park management practices that reduce the
General Plan
City of Hayward Policy Document

Page | 3-150 July 2014

potential for wildland fires. [Source: Existing Policy] (CSO)
HAZ-5.6 Regional Coordination
The City shall coord inate with Alameda County,
the cities of Pleasanton, Dublin, and San Ramon,
and other fire protection agencies to reduce the
potential for wildfire hazards in the East Bay hills
and participate in mutual aid agreements . [Source:

Existing Policy, modified] (CSO)
HAZ-5.7 Fire Flow Adequacy
The City shall maintain adequate water supply
systems and flows to meet fire suppression needs
throughout the city including new and existing
development. Water supply locations to be defined
for emergency services. [Source: New Policy]
HAZ-5.8 Fire Resistance Retrofits
The City shall encourage retrofits of homes within
neighborhoods proximal to fire hazard severity
zones to increase the prevalence of home
hardening techniques . Develop and formalize a
plan for providing defe nsible space assistance,
public education, and regulatory enforcement of
fire resistance activities and programs, such as the
Weed Abatement Program. [Source: New Policy]
HAZ-5.9 Evacuation During Wildfires
The City shall increase the resilience of the
neighborhoods proximal to fire hazard severity
zones during a potential wildfire evacuation
through:
 Enforcing visible address numbers painted
on sidewalks enforced through the City,
 Developing multiple language accessible
materials for how to prepare your family
and home for an evacuation and go kit,
 Identifying and preparing vulnerable
populations that may need assistance to
evacuate,
 Maintaining critical evacuation routes ,
community fire breaks and,
 Adequate ingress and egress to new
developments. [Source: New Policy]

Areas of the San Francisco Bay Area that burned during
wildfires between 1950 and 2011 (yellow). Source: Association of Bay Area Governments

General Plan
Policy Document
Hazards

July 2014 Page | 3-151

Areas bordering and near Hayward with Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (dark red) and High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (orange). Source: CALFIRE

General Plan
City of Hayward Policy Document

Page | 3-152 July 2014

Goal 6 Climate Change
Adaptation/Resiliency
Climate change is caused by the addition of excess
greenhouse gases (GHGs) to the atmosphere,
which traps heat near the earth’s surface raising
global average temperatures. The resulting increase
in average temperatures across the globe affects sea
levels, precipitation patterns, the severity of
wildfires, the prevalence of extreme heat events,
water supply, and ocean temperatures and
chemistry. Hayward is vulnerable to the effects of
climate change as understood through the findings
of the Climate Vulnerability Assessment (Appendix
A). Policies under th is goal build on existing
policies within the Hazards Element, Natural
Resources Element , the Community Health and
Quality of Life Element as well as the entire
General Plan with the intent of supporting the
ability of the community to adapt to climate
change.

GOAL HAZ-6
Community resilience to climate change is
increased through adapted community
capacity, infrastructure, services, parks, and
open spaces.
[Source: New Goal; Climate
Vulnerability Assessment] [connected to HQL
Goal 9, Community Resiliency
HAZ-6.1 Vulnerable Populations
The City shall provide vulnerable community
members with language- appropriate information
on available financial, technical, and educational
resources and programming to increase resilience
against climate change hazards, including sea level
rise, extreme heat, flooding, wildfire, and
groundwater rise. The City shall develop and
distribute information on adaptation measures
including building weatherization, energy and water
efficiency, and emergency preparedness. [Source:

New Policy][connected to HQL-9.9 and EJ-1.15]

HAZ-6.2 Resilience Hubs
The City sha ll develop and support a network of
resilience hubs to facilitate health, food, medical,
and emergency services during climate hazards
such as extreme heat events, flooding, and poor air
quality events. [Source: New Policy] [connected to HQL-

9.9 and EJ-1.15]
HAZ-6.3 Green Economy
The City ’s Economic Development Division,
Landscape Maintenance Division, and
Environmental Services Division shall partner with
community-based organizations and the Alameda
County Workforce Development Board to support
the creation of jobs, training programs, and
workforce development in urban forest
management, tree planting, and green
infrastructure development to provide sustained
economic benefit and ensure long-term capacity for
maintenance [Source: New Policy][connected to HQL -

9.4 and 9.5] [connected to new CAP action CS-1]
HAZ-6.4 Adapted Community Structures
and Infrastructure
The City shall expand the resilience of critical
buildings and infrastructure through assessment of
needed retrofits to function properly while subject
to increased climate hazard frequency such as
flooding, extreme heat, regional wildfires, and
landslides. [Source: New Policy] [connected to PFS

1.7][connected to new CAP measure EG]
HAZ-6.5 Adapted Services
The City shall coordinate with emergency services
as well as utility providers to assess needed service
improvements in providing increased redundancy
and uninterrupted service for water, power, and
emergency service response.[Source: New Policy]
General Plan
Policy Document
Hazards

July 2014 Page | 3-153
HAZ-6.6 Transportation Corridors
The City shall improve the resiliency of
transportation infrastructure by identifying highly
trafficked active transportation and commute
patterned streets and prioritizing permeable
pavement, shading, lighting, and drinking water
improvements. [Source: New Policy]
HAZ-6.7 Parks and Open Space Resilience
Protect open spaces, habitats, and parks impacted
by sea level rise, floods, drought, extreme heat, and
wildfire including:
 Protect existing floodplains, open space,
and other natural features that provide
flood storage by establishing minimum
buffers, limiting new development in
wetlands and buffers.
 Protect and expand large, continuous
greenspaces such as parks, median strips
and street trees wherever possible for
greater cooling magnitude and extent.

Include a mix of grass and trees for
greatest cooling benefits. [Source: New
Policy]
HAZ-6.8 Resilient Power
The City shall work with utility companies to
improve grid resilience and backup power for the
community including utility activities that:
 Harden vulnerable overhead lines against
winds and wildfires,
 Protect energy infrastructure and increase
redundancy of energy storage and
distribution systems in surrounding hazard
zones for wildfire,
 Invest in sustainable backup power
sources to provide redundancy a nd
continued services for critical facilities
during periods of high demand during
extreme heat events,
 Explore the feasibility of installing
microgrids, including for critical health
care facilities. [Source: New Policy] [connected
to new CAP action EG-1.4]
HAZ-6.9 Climate Overlay Zones
The City shall establish hazard overlay zone s.

Overlay designations shall be developed to address
potential future at-risk areas, such as areas prone to
wildfire, subsidence, future floodp lain or area of
temporary inundation, or area at risk for high
wind/storm events due to future climate change
impact models. Apply overlay zones to areas with
the greatest current hazards and/or future climate
impacts. Associate corresponding risk reductio n,
adaptation policies, and standards specific to the
hazard or climate impact. Overlay zones should
include development standards for appropriate risk
mitigation measures. [Source: New Policy]
HAZ-6.10 Essential Facilities Siting
Locate, when feasible, new essential public
facilities, including hospitals and health care
facilities, emergency shelters, fire stations,
emergency command centers, and emergency
communications facilities, outside of climate
change hazard zones. [Source: New Policy ; see also
HAZ-4.10]
HAZ-6.11 Climate Adaptation Planning
Coordination
Coordinate with Alameda County and neighboring
jurisdictions to prioritize climate adaptation efforts
that address regional climate change vulnerabilities
of community members, infrastructure and
services, natural resources and ecosystems, and
critical facilities and buildings. [Source: New Policy] Goal 7 Hazardous Materials
Hazardous materials are toxic, ignitable, corrosive,
or reactive substances that can cause harm to
people. Hazardous materials are used by
households and businesses within urban areas. The
General Plan
City of Hayward Policy Document

Page | 3-154 July 2014

improper use and disposal of hazardous materials
can contaminate soil and groundwater resources
and compromise the health and quality of life of
residents. Accidents inv olving the transportation
of hazardous materials can also cause explosions or
spills that endanger the lives and property of nearby
residents and businesses. This goal and its
supporting policies are designed to establish
strategies to minimize exposure to hazardous
materials through the documentation, monitoring,
clean-up, and re -use of hazardous material sites;
and the implementation of best practices for the
routine use, storage, transport, and disposal of
hazardous materials.

GOAL HAZ-7
Protect people and environmental resources
from contaminated hazardous material sites
and m inimize risks associated with the use,
storage, transport, and disposal of hazardous
materials. [Source: Existing Policy, modified]
HAZ-7.1 Hazardous Materials Program
The City shall maintain its status as a Certified
Unified Program Agency and implement the City’s
Unified Hazardous Materials and Hazardous Waste
Management Program, which includes:
 Hazardous Materials Release Response
Plans and Inventories (Hazardous
Materials Business Plans - HMBP);
 California Accidental Release Prevention
(CalARP) Program;
 Underground Storage Tank (UST)
Program;
 Above-ground Petroleum Storage Act
(APSA) Program , including Spill
Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure
(SPCC) Plans;
 Hazardous Waste Generator Program;
 On-site Hazardous Waste Treatment
(Tiered Permit) Program; and
 California Fire Code Hazardous Ma terial
Management Plans (HMMP) and
Hazardous Materials Inventory Statements
(HMIS). [Source: Existing Policy; City Staff]
(CSO/MPSP/RDR)
HAZ-7.2 Site Investigations
The City shall require site investigations to
determine the presence of hazardous materials
and/or waste contamination before discretionary
project approvals are issued by the City. The City
shall require appropriate measures to be taken to
protect the health and safety of site users and the
greater Hayward community. [Source: Existing Policy;
City Staff] (RDR)
HAZ-7.3 Permit Requirements
The City shall direct the Fire Chief (or their
designee) and the Development Services Director
(or their designee) to evaluate all project
applications that involve hazardous materials,
electronic waste, medical waste, and other
hazardous waste to determine appropriate permit
requirements and procedures . [Source: Existing
Policy; City Staff] (RDR)
HAZ-7.4 Land Use Buffers
The City shall review applic ations for commercial
and industrial uses that involve the use, storage, and
transport of hazardous materials to determine the
need for buffer zones or setbacks to minimize risks
to homes, schools, community centers, hospitals,
and other sensitive uses. [Source: Existing Policy]
(RDR)
HAZ-7.5 Collection Programs
The City shall maintain and further develop its
collection programs for household hazardous
waste and e- waste (cell phones, batteries,
computers, televisions, computers, monitors, etc.).
[Source: Existing Policy] (CSO/MPSP)
General Plan
Policy Document
Hazards

July 2014 Page | 3-155
HAZ-7.6 Education Resources
The City shall provide educational resources to
residents and businesses to promote safe practices
related to the use, storage, transportation, and
disposal of hazardous materials. [Source: Existing
Policy] (PI)
HAZ-7.7 Agency Coordination
The City shall coordinate with State, Federal, and
local agencies to develop and promote best
practices related to the use, storage, transportation,
and disposal of hazardous materials. [Source:

Existing Policy] (IGC/PI)
HAZ-7.8 Truck Routes
The City shall maintain designated truck routes for
the transportation of hazardous materials through
the City of Hayward. T he City shall discourage
truck routes passing through residential
neighborhoods to the maximu m extent feasible.
[Source: Existing Policy] (MPSP/PI)
Goal 8 Evacuation Capacity
Consistent with Government Code Section 65302
as amended by AB 747, AB 1409, and SB 99, the
City conducted an emergency evacuation analysis
attached as Appendix B. The analysis complies with
above requirements in identifying evacuation
routes and capacity under several emergency
scenarios. The evacuation scenarios included
wildfire, tsunami, dam failure, and a gas pipeline
failure. Policies address the identified constraints as a result of this analysis.

Pursuant to SB 99, r esidential developments in
hazard areas that do not have at least two
emergency evacuation routes are shown in the
figure below identifying single access roads . Single
access roads are a local street that feeds into a
collector with a singular point of entry and exit.

These roads present potential evacuation
complications necessitating added evacuation
management.

GOAL HAZ-8
Community resilience to natural and man -
made hazards is attained through increased
evacuation capacity and emergency
preparedness.
[Source: New Goal]
HAZ-8.1 Evacuation Route Maintenance
Maintain roadways that are likely to function as key
evacuation routes by property inspections, public
education, homeowner association education,
roadside vegetation management [Source: New
Policy].

HAZ-8.2 Vulnerable Population Assistance
The City shall i dentify vulnerable populations that
may need assistance to evacuate and prepare
coordinated language accessible communication
and assistance processes for identified populations
related to evacuation procedures and preparedness.

Include resources for the visually impaired, hearing
impaired, mobility impaired, people with medical
conditions and the unhoused. [Source: New Policy;
City Staff]
HAZ-8.3 Transportation Coordination
Encourage implementation of communication
systems to coordinate advanced mobilization of
transit operators to facilitate evacuations during
flood and wildfire events with hazard alert
notifications. Implement through a Traffic Control
Center to coordinate all evacuation activities. This
center would have up to the minute reports on
traffic patterns and can communicate directly with
the broadcast media to let drivers know about
roadway congestion and conditions and direct
them to alternate routes. [Source: New Policy, SCAG]
HAZ-8.4 Evacuation Management Tools
The City shall coordinate investments with Caltrans
in retrofitting freeway and arterial routes through
General Plan
City of Hayward Policy Document

Page | 3-156 July 2014

structural improvements and increased staff
capacity including:
 Management controls for signal
coordination to allow uninterrupted flow
(green wave).
 Traffic control plans to increase
intersection capacity including minimized
left-turn movements, adjusted signal
timings, and toll suspension.
 Ability to manage movements at key
intersections to increase throughput.
 Backup power and other preparation for
signal operation during power outages.
 Ability to communicate through
changeable message signs.
 Lane control equipment procurement
 Shoulder clearance and parking
restrictions along primary routes of
evacuation [Source: New Policy]
HAZ-8.5 Single Access Roads
The City shall provide obstruction removal services
where road systems are antiquated and do not
provide for proper evacuation or two- way flow.

Additionally, the City will improve the accessibility
of single access roads by emergency vehicles .
[Source: New Policy]
HAZ-8.6 Evacuation Facilities
The City shall implement communication methods
to coordinate advanced and timely evacuations
with schools, hospitals, and vulnerable populations
to evacuation shelters when relevant . [Source: New
Policy]
HAZ-8.7 Evacuation Planning
The City shall develop pre -response plans and
accompanying evacuation plans for all
neighborhoods proximal to each type of hazard
zone including city -wide earthquake risk . [Source:

New Policy]
HAZ-8.8 Annual Trainings
The City shall conduct community and emergency
response evacuation trainings annually through the
Traffic Control Center. [Source: New Policy]
HAZ-8.9 High Fire Limitations
The City s hall facilitate restriction of parking,
construction permits or right- of-way
encroachment on high fire days. [Source: New Policy;
SCAG]
HAZ-8.10 Public Education
The City shall communicate to the public on
essential resources and procedures through a
variety of communica tion tools and in multiple
languages on topics including:

Education on the California Standard Statewide
Evacuation Terminology.
 Emergency evacuation checklists for
residents.
 Creation and education of the public on
evacuation maps.
 Available transportation services.
 Evacuation shelter and support service
options. [Source: New Policy]
HAZ-8.11 Resource Management
The City shall create clear and transparent
evacuation plans and systems across critical
facilities and residential areas including strategies of  Redundant staffing and clarity on staff
roles and expertise.
 Prepared critical facilities with backup
communication systems and critical
supplies/services.

General Plan
Policy Document
Hazards

July 2014 Page | 3-157
 Transportation plans for all critical
facilities and communities in need of
additional assistance
 Routine management exercises to practice
evacuation drills as well as inform resource
needs. [Source: New Policy]
General Plan
City of Hayward Policy Document

Page | 3-158 July 2014

Neighborhood areas of Hayward with Single Access Roads identified with access points (orange) and neighborhood perimeters (yellow) .

General Plan
Policy Document
Hazards

July 2014 Page | 3-159
Goal 9 Airport Hazards
The Hayward Executive Airport is designated as a
General Aviation Reliever Airport located in
northwest Hayward. The airport is owned and
operated by the City of Hayward. A variety of
aircraft, including single and twin-engine airplanes,
corporate jets, and helicopters, use the airport on a
daily basis. Commercial, industrial, residential, and recreational properties near the airport could be
exposed to aviation -related accidents and related
hazards. This goal and its supporting policies are
designed to minimize this exposure. The Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) has the sole
authority to regulate aviation activities in the United States, including the certification of aircraft and
pilots. The City of Hayward’s role is to maintain
and operate the airport and regulate land uses in the
vicinity of the airport. Related policies that address
airport noise are provided under Goal HAZ-8.

GOAL HAZ-9
Minimize exposure to safety hazards
associated with aircraft using the Hayward
Executive Airport. [Source: Existing Goa l; City
Staff].

HAZ-9.1 Land Use Safety Compatibility and
Airspace Protection Criteria
The City shall consider all applicable federal
statutes (including 49 U.S.C. 47107), federal
regulations (including 14 Code of Federal
Regulations 77 et seq.), the FAA’s Airport
Compliance Manual, FAA Advisory Circulars and
other forms of written guidance, and State law, with
respect to criteria related to land use safety and
airspace protection when evaluating development
applications within the Airport Influence Ar ea of
the Hayward Executive Airport. [Source: Existing
Policy, City Staff] (RDR)

Hayward Executive Airport.

HAZ-9.2 Airport Land Use Compatibility
Plan
The City shall require all development projects
within the Airport Influence Area designated in the
Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan of the
Hayward Executive Airport to comply with all
applicable federal statutes (including 49 U.S.C.
47107), federal reg ulations (including 14 Code of
Federal Regulations 77 et seq.), the FAA’s Airport
Compliance Manual, FAA Advisory Circulars and
other forms of written guidance, and State law, with
respect to criteria related to land use safety and
airspace protection. [Source: Existing Policy, City Staff] (IGC/RDR)
HAZ-9.3 Commission Review
The City shall ensure that all applicable plans,
ordinances, and development applications are
reviewed by the Alameda County Airport Land Use
Commission if required by State law. [Source:

Existing Policy, City Staff] (IGC/MPSP/RDR)
Goal 10 Noise Hazards
Exposure to excessive noise can impact the health
and quality of life of residents and employees .

Excessive noise can cause hearing loss , stress,
hypertension, sleep disturbance, and fatigue. The
Hayward community contains a variety of noise
sources, including aircraft, trains, vehicle traffic on freeways and roadways, and industrial and
General Plan
City of Hayward Policy Document

Page | 3-160 July 2014

commercial operations . This goal and its
supporting policies are designed to min imize
human exposure to excessive noise by evaluating
noise exposure risks and incorporating appropriate
mitigation measures.

GOAL HAZ-10
Minimize human exposure to excessive noise
and ground vibration. [Source: Existing
Policy]
HAZ-10.1 Locating Noise Sensitive Uses
The City shall strive to locate noise sensitive uses,
(e.g., residences, schools, hospitals, libraries,
religious institutions, and convalescent homes)
away from major sources of noise. [Source: Existing
Policy; City Staff] (RDR)
HAZ-10.2 Noise Study and Mitigation
The City shall require development projects in
areas where they may be exposed to major noise
sources (e.g. roadways, rail lines, and aircraft or
other non-transportation noise sources) to conduct
a project level environmental noise analysis. The
noise analysis shall determine noise exposure and
noise standard compatibility with respect to the
noise standards identified in Table HAZ-1 and shall
incorporate noise mitigation when located in noise
environments that are not compati ble with the
proposed uses of the project. The City shall use
Table HAZ -1 (Exterior Noise Standards for
Various Land Uses) and Figure HAZ -1 (Future
Noise Contour Maps) to determine potential noise
exposure impacts, noise compatibility thresholds,
and the need for mitigation. The City shall
determine mitigation measures based on project-
specific noise studies, and may include sound
barriers, building setbacks, the use of closed
windows and the installation of heating and air
conditioning ventilation system s, and the
installation of noise attenuating windows and
wall/ceiling insulation. [Source: Existing Policy]
(RDR)

S NOISE TERMINOLOGY

dBA: Measurement unit for “a-weighted
decibels,” which are commonly used for
measuring environmental and industrial noise
and the potential hearing damage associated
noise health effects.

Equivalent Noise Level (Leq): Constant
noise level that would deliver the same acoustic
energy to the ear of a listener as the actual
time-varying noise would deliver over the same
exposure time. No “penalties” are added to any
noise levels during the exposure time; Leq
would be the same regardless of the time of
day during which the noise occurs.

Day-Night Average Noise Level: (Ldn):

A 24-hour average Leq with a 10 dBA
“penalty” added to noise levels during the
hours of 10:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. to account
for increased sensitivity that people tend to
have to nighttime noise. Because of this
penalty, the Ldn would always be higher than
its corresponding 24-hour Leq (e.g., a constant
60 dBA noise over 24 hours would have a 60
dBA Leq, but a 66.4 dBA Ldn).

Community Noise Equivalent Level
(CNEL): An Ldn with an additional 5 dBA
“penalty” for the evening hours between 7:00
P.M. and 10:00 P.M. This is essentially a
measure of ambient noise.

Sound Exposure Level or Single Event
Level (SEL): A descriptor used to characterize
the severity of short-duration sound events.

SEL is the time-averaged, constant intensity,
A-weighted sound level over a one-second
reference time that would produce the same
sound exposure as the actual time-varying
sound over the actual exposure time. In
practice, SEL is usually applied in situations
where there are multiple sound events, each
one having its own characteristic SEL.

General Plan
Policy Document
Hazards

July 2014 Page | 3-161

TABLE HAZ-1
Exterior Noise Compatibility Standards for Various Land Uses Land Use Type Highest Level of Exterior Noise Exposure
that is Regarded as “Normally Acceptable”a
(Ldnb or CNELc)
Residential: Single-Family Homes, Duplex,
Mobile Home 60
Residential: Townhomes and Multi-Family
Apartments and Condominiums 65
Urban Residential Infilld and Mixed-Use Projectse 70
Lodging: Motels and Hotels 65
Schools, Libraries, Churches, Hospitals, Nursing
Homes 70
Auditoriums, Concert Hall, Amphitheaters Mitigation based on site-specific study Sports Arena, Outdoor Spectator Sports Mitigation based on site-specific study Playgrounds, Neighborhood Parks 70
Golf Courses, Riding Stables, Water Recreation,
Cemeteries 75
Office Buildings: Business, Commercial, and
Professional 70
Industrial Manufacturing, Utilities, Agriculture 75
Source: Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, State of California General Plan Guidelines 2003, October 2003.
a. As defined in the State of California General Plan Guidelines 200, “Normally Acceptable” means that the specified land uses is satisfactory, based upon the assumption that any building involved is of normal conventional construction, without any special noise mitigation. For projects located along major transportation corridors (major freeways, arterials, and rail lines) this “normally acceptable” exterior noise level may be exceeded for certain areas of the project site (e.g. the frontage adjacent to the corridor or parking areas) with the exception of primary open space areas (see policies HAZ-8.5 and HAZ-8.6). b. Ldn or Day Night Average is an average 24-hour noise measurement that factors day and night noise levels.
c. CNEL or Community Noise Equivalent Level measurements are a weighted average of sound levels gathered throughout a 24-hour period.
d. Urban residential infill would include all types of residential development within existing or planned urban areas (such as Downtown, The Cannery Neighborhood, and the South Hayward BART Urban Neighborhood) and along major corridors (such as Mission Boulevard). e. Mixed-Use Projects would include all mixed-use developments throughout the City of Hayward.

General Plan
City of Hayward Policy Document

Page | 3-162 July 2014

HAZ-10.3 Incremental Noise Impacts of
Commercial and Industrial
Development
The City shall consider the potential noise impacts
of commercial and industrial developments that are
located near residences and shall require noise
mitigation measures as a condition of project
approval. [Source: Existing Policy; City Staff] (RDR)
HAZ-10.4 Noise Mitigation and Urban Design
The City shall consider the visual impact of noise
mitigation measures and shall require solutions that
do not conflict with urban design goals and
standards. [Source: Existing Policy; City Staff] (RDR)
HAZ-10.5 Residential Noise Standards
The City shall require the design of new residential
development to comply with the following noise
standards:
 The maximum acceptable interior noise
level for all new residential units (single -
family, duplex, mobile home, multi-family,
and mixed use units) shall be an Ldn of 45
dB with windows closed.
 For project locations that are primarily
exposed to aircraft, train, and BART noise,
the maximum instantaneous noise level in
bedrooms shall not exceed 50dB(A) at
night (10:00 pm to 7 :00 am), and the
maximum instantaneous noise level in all
interior rooms shall not exceed 55dB(A)
during the day (7:00 am to 10:00 pm) with
windows closed.
 The maximum acceptable exterior noise
level for the primary open space area of a
detached single -family home , duplex or
mobile home , which is typically the
backyard or a fenced side yard, shall be an
Ldn of 60 dB. This standard shall be
measured at the approximate center of the
primary open space area. This standard
does not apply to secondary open spa ce
areas, such as front yards, balconies,
stoops, and porches.
 The maximum acceptable exterior noise
level for the primary open space area of
townhomes and multi -family apartments
or condominiums (private rear yards for
townhomes; and common courtyards,
roof gardens, or gathering spaces for
multi-family projects) shall be an Ldn of 65
dB. This standard shall be measured at the
approximate center of the primary open
space area. This standard does not apply
to secondary open space areas, such as
front yard s, balconies, stoops, and
porches.
 The maximum acceptable exterior noise
level for the primary open space area of
urban residential infill and mixed -use
projects (private rear yards for
townhomes; and common courtyards,
roof gardens, or gathering spaces f or
multi-family or mixed -use projects) shall
be an Ldn of 70 dB. Urban residential infill
would include all types of residential
development within existing or planned
urban areas (such as Downtown, The
Cannery Neighborhood, and the South
Hayward BART Urban Neighborhood)
and along major corridors (such as Mission
Boulevard). This standard shall be
measured at the approximate center of the
primary open space area. This standard
does not apply to secondary open space
areas, such as front yards, balconies,
stoops, and porches. [Source: Existing Policy]
(RDR)
HAZ-10.6 Noise Standards for Lodging,
Nursing Homes, and Hospitals

The City shall require the design of new lodging
facilities, nursing homes, hospitals, and other
General Plan
Policy Document
Hazards

July 2014 Page | 3-163
similar uses to comply with the following noise
standards:
 The maximum acceptable interior noise
level for sleeping areas shall be an Ldn of
45 dB with windows closed.
 For project locations that are primarily
exposed to aircraft, train, and BART noise,
the maximum instantaneous noise level in
sleeping areas shall not exceed 50dB(A) at
night (10:00 pm to 7:00 am) and 55dB(A)
during the day (7:00 am to 10:00 pm) with
windows closed. [Source: Existing Policy; City
Staff] (RDR)
HAZ-10.7 Noise Standards for Office and
Similar Uses
The City shall require the design of new office
developments and similar uses to achieve a
maximum interior noise standard of 45dBA Leq
(peak hour). [Source: Existing Policy, City Staff] (RDR) HAZ-10.8 Park Noise
The City shall coordinate with the Hayward Area
Recreation and Park District (HARD) and the East
Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) to establish
and enforce hours of operation for park and
recreational facilities near residential homes.
[Source: Existing Policy; City Staff] (IGC)
HAZ-10.9 OSHA Standards
The City shall encourage businesses to comply with
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) standards related to noise safety and ear
protection when employees work in noisy
environments (interior and exterior). [Source:

Existing Policy; City Staff] (CSO)
HAZ-10.10 BART Trains and Bus Transit
The City shall encourage BART and AC Transit to
upgrade their trains and transit fleets with vehicles
that generate less noise when driving and idling.
[Source: Existing Policy] (IGC)
HAZ-10.11 Freeway Sound Walls
The City shall encourage Caltrans , in conjunction
with any new freeway project, to construct
attractive sound walls and landscaping strips along
freeways to protect adjacent areas from excessive
freeway noise. [Source: Existing Policy] (IGC)
HAZ-10.12 Transportation Noise
The City shall consider potential noise impacts
when evaluating proposals f or transportation
projects, including road, freeway, and transit
projects, and will strive to minimize noise impacts
through the implementation of mitigation
measures. [Source: Existing Policy] (RDR/IGC)

Sources of noise in the city of Hayward.

HAZ-10.13 Utilities
The City shall require the evaluation of public
facilities (e.g., utility substations, water storage
facilities, and pumping stations) to determine

General Plan
City of Hayward Policy Document

Page | 3-164 July 2014

potential noise impacts on surrounding uses and
identify appropriate mitigation measures. [Source:

Existing Policy] (IGC/CSO/RDR)
HAZ-10.14 Airport Noise
The City shall monitor noise impacts from aircraft
operations at the Hayward Executive Airport and
maintain and implement the noise abatement
policies and procedures outlined in the Airport
Noise Ordinance and Airport Land Use
Compatibility Plan. [Source: Existing Policy] (CSO ,

MPSP, RDR)

Aircraft at the Hayward Executive Airport

HAZ-10.15 Airport Noise Evaluation and
Mitigation
The City shall require project applicants to evaluate
potential airport noise impacts if the project is
located within the 60 dB CNEL contour line of the
Hayward Executive Airport or Oakland
International Airport (as mapped in the Airport
Land Use Compatibility Plan). All projects shall be
required to mitigate impacts to comply with the
interior and exterior noise standards established by
the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. [Source :

Existing Policy, City Staff] (IGC/RDR)
HAZ-10.16 Airport Disclosure Notices
The City shall require that all new development
within an airport-defined over-flight zone provide
deed notices disclosing airport over -flights and
noise upon transfer of title to future residents and
property owners. [Source: Existing Policy, City Staff] (RDR)
HAZ-10.17 Community Noise Control
Ordinance
The City shall maintain, implement, and enforce a
community noise control ordinance to regulate
noise levels from public and private properties,
vehicles, construction sites , and landscaping
activities. [Source: Existing Policy] (CSO/MPSP)
HAZ-10.18 Mixed-Use Developments
The City shall require the full disclosure of the
potential noise impacts of living in a mixed -use
development by requiring residential disclosure
notices within deeds and lease agreements as a
condition of project approval. [Source: Existing
Policy, City Staff] (RDR)
HAZ-10.19 Downtown Housing Development
The City shall require the full disclosure of the
potential noise impacts of living in an urban
downtown environment by requiring residential
disclosure notices within deeds and lease
agreements as a condition of project approval.
[Source: Existing Policy, City Staff] (RDR)
HAZ-10.20 Construction Noise Study
The City may require development projects subject
to discretionary approval to assess potential
construction noise impacts on nearby sensitive uses
and to minimize impacts on those uses, to the
extent f easible. [Source: Existing Policy, City Staff] (RDR)
HAZ-10.21 Construction and Maintenance
Noise Limits
The City shall limit the hours of construction and
maintenance activities to the less sensitive hours of
the day (7:00am to 7:00pm Monday through
General Plan
Policy Document
Hazards

July 2014 Page | 3-165
Saturday and 10:00am to 6:00 pm on Sundays and
holidays) [Source: Existing Policy, City Staff] (RDR)
HAZ-10.22 Vibration Impact Assessment
The City shall require a vibration impact
assessment for proposed projects in which heavy -
duty construction equipment would be used (e.g.
pile driving, bulldozing) within 200 feet of an
existing structure or sensitive receptor. If
applicable, the City shall require all feasible
mitigation measures to be implemented to ensure
that no damage or disturbance to structures or
sensitive receptors would occur. [Source: Existing
Policy, City Staff] (RDR)
HAZ-10.23 Transportation Vibration
The City shall require new residential and
commercial projects located within 200 feet of
existing major freeways and railroad lines (e.g.
freight, Amtrak, and Bay Area Rapid Transit) to
conduct a ground vibration and vibration noise
evaluation consistent with City approved
methodologies (e.g. Caltrans, Federal
Transportation Authority). [Source: Existing Policy,
City Staff] (RDR)

Hazards Element Update
Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment
prepared by
City of Hayward
Planning Division
777 B Street
Hayward, California 94541
Contact: Leigha Schmidt, Principal Planner
prepared with the assistance of
Rincon Consultants, Inc.
449 15th Street, Suite 303
Oakland, California 94612
June 2022

Table of Contents

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment i
Table of Contents
1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Settings ................................................................................................................................ 1

1.2 Vulnerability Assessment Methodology ............................................................................. 3 2 Exposure ......................................................................................................................................... 7

2.1 Climate Drivers .................................................................................................................... 7

2.2 Climate Hazards ................................................................................................................13 3 Sensitivity ......................................................................................................................................24

3.1 People ..............................................................................................................................24

3.2 Community Structures and Infrastructure .......................................................................26

3.3 Parks and Open Spaces ....................................................................................................26

3.4 Services ............................................................................................................................27 4 Impacts .........................................................................................................................................28

4.1 Temperature .....................................................................................................................28

4.2 Precipitation ......................................................................................................................31

4.3 Sea Level Rise ....................................................................................................................35 5 Adaptive Capacity ........................................................................................................................... 2

5.1 Regional and Local Coordination and Assistance ............................................................... 2

5.2 City-Specific Capacity .......................................................................................................... 5 6 Vulnerability Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 7

6.1 People ................................................................................................................................. 7

6.2 Community Structures & Infrastructure ............................................................................. 8

6.3 Parks & Open Space ............................................................................................................ 9

6.4 Services .............................................................................................................................10 7 References ....................................................................................................................................11 City of Hayward
Hazards Element Update

ii
Tables
Table 1 Potential Impacts and Cascading Risk Factors related to Temperature ...........................28 Table 2 Potential Impacts and Cascading Risk Factors related to Precipitation ............................32 Table 3 Potential Impacts and Cascading Risk Factors related to Bayshore Flooding ..................35 Table 4 Coordinated Planning Documents & Agreements .............................................................. 3 Figures
Figure 1 Climate Change Hazards and Anticipated Impacts in Hayward .......................................... 1 Figure 2 Map of Key City Facilities in Hayward ................................................................................. 2 Figure 3 Historical and Projected Average Maximum Temperature in Hayward (Graph) ................ 8 Figure 4 Historical and Projected Average Minimum Temperature in Hayward.............................. 9 Figure 5 Historical and Projected Average Annual Precipitation in Hayward ................................10 Figure 6 Historical and Projected Average Maximum 1-Day Precipitation in Hayward .................10 Figure 7 Sea Level Risein Hayward through 2050 and 2100 ...........................................................12 Figure 8 Historical and Projected Annual Average of Extreme Heat Days in Hayward ..................14 Figure 9 Historical and Projected Annual Average of Warm Nights in Hayward ............................14 Figure 10 Historical and Projected Changes to Maximum Dry Spell in Hayward .............................15 Figure 11 KBDI Historical and Projected Changes in Hayward .........................................................16 Figure 12 Fire Hazard Severity Zones in the Hayward Area ..............................................................18 Figure 13 2050 Projected Bayshore SLR in Hayward with a 50-Year Storm Surge ..........................20 Figure 14 Mid-Century Groundwater Risk in Hayward .....................................................................22 Figure 15 End-Century Groundwater Risk in Hayward .....................................................................23

Introduction

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 1
1 Introduction
Climate change is caused by the addition of excess greenhouse gases (GHGs) to the atmosphere, which traps heat near the earth’s surface raising global average temperatures. This is what is referred to as the greenhouse effect. The resulting increase in average temperatures across the globe affects sea levels, precipitation patterns, the severity of wildfires, the prevalence of extreme heat events, water supply, and ocean temperatures and chemistry.1 According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), global GHG concentrations are now higher than they have been in the past 400,000 years; an increase from 280 parts per million to 410 parts per million in the last 150 years.2 This dramatic increase is attributed to human activities beginning with the industrial revolution in the 1800s, which represented a shift from an agrarian and handicraft- based economy to one dominated by industry and machine manufacturing.1 The City of Hayward (the City) has initiated an update to the Hazards Element chapter of their General Plan. Consistent with government code 65302 (as amended by Senate Bill 379), this report provides a climate change vulnerability assessment for the City to assist in the development of climate change adaptation and resilience policies and programs for the Hazards Element. The assessment evaluates the potential impacts of climate change on community assets and populations. Understanding the community's vulnerabilities to climate change provides a foundation to develop adaptation strategies for the Hazards Element Update and other planning efforts in the City.

The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report defines vulnerability as “the propensity or predisposition to be adversely affected.”2 The Assessment Report adds that vulnerability “encompasses various concepts and elements including sensitivity or susceptibility to harm and lack of capacity to cope and adapt.”2 This climate change vulnerability assessment examines the susceptibility of the City’s social, economic, and environmental assets to harm from climate related hazards, and the community’s ability to adapt to the changing risks pertaining to those hazards. Figure 1 identifies projected climate changes and anticipated impacts that the Hayward community are anticipated to experience.

Introduction

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 1
Figure 1 Climate Change Hazards and Anticipated Impacts in Hayward

Introduction

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 1

1.1 Settings
History
Hayward was incorporated on March 11, 1876.3 The City encompasses 64 square miles and borders the cities of San Leandro, Union City, Freemont, and Pleasanton.3 Several census designated places also border Hayward including Castro Valley, San Lorenzo, Cherryland, Sunol, and Fairview. The City is part of the larger East Bay Area, located 25 miles southeast of San Francisco. The San Francisco Bay is located immediately to the west and East Bay Regional Parks are located to the east. The Hayward Faultline runs north to south at the base of the Hayward hillside.

Land Use
Over half of the City of Hayward is comprised of San Francisco Bay waters, the Baylands, and open space. The Baylands are part of the Hayward Regional Shoreline and functions as a tidal wetland.

The remainder of the city is composed of residential (18 percent), parks and recreation (7 percent), industrial (6 percent), and an assortment of mixed use and quasi-public land uses.4 Residential development is present throughout the city with minimal residential use in areas west of Industrial Boulevard and south of Industrial Parkway, where industrial land uses are more prevalent. The vast majority of residential development is single-family with only 3% of land area dedicated to multi- family.4 The industrial areas are situated to the western and southern most areas of the City.

Commercial areas are located around Mission Street which runs north to south along the entire length of Hayward as well as downtown and along Jackson Street. The City is home to approximately 147,163 residents.5
Public Facilities and Amenities
The City operates a variety of public buildings and facilities, including City Hall, two libraries, an animal shelter, a water pollution control facility, nine fire stations, an airport and parking facilities.5 Public facilities managed by the City amount to approximately 2,500 acres. The City also owns and operates approximately 2,400 acres of open space, 3,000 acres of parks and recreation, and 400 acres of public utilities including storm drainage, streetlights, and wastewater treatment.4 Hayward maintains two different sanitary sewer systems, water distribution pipelines, and the local road network.

City of Hayward
Hazards Element Update

2 Figure 2 Map of Key City Facilities in Hayward

Introduction

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 3
Services
The City provides public and community services to residents and businesses in Hayward, including the procurement and distribution of potable water, maintaining the network of sewer collection pipelines and wastewater lift stations, wastewater treatment, and maintenance of smaller storm drain pipes. The City also operates its own police and fire departments providing public safety and emergency services. The Hayward Fire Department provides wildfire mitigation, flood response and regulation of hazardous materials.5 The City-based fire department may also request and/or respond to mutual aid agreements between surrounding areas as well as the Alameda County Fire Department (ACFD) for mitigation services.5 The Hayward Police Departments provides community safety related services.

The Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District own and maintain major storm drainage facilities in Hayward. It also owns and maintains major flood protection facilities within Hayward and much of western Alameda County. East Bay Municipal Utilities District (EBMUD) and Alameda County provide services and maintenance associated with water provision to some parts of the City.5 Water for the City is sourced through San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) which provides drinking water from Hetch Hetchy aqueducts and the Sierra Nevada.

Interstate 880 runs through the City from the north to south providing access to the Bay Area and eventually linking up with interstate 80 traversing across the entire country. The Hayward-San Mateo Bridge is accessed through the western point of the City and provides access to the west side of the Bay. Union Pacific owns and operates heavy rail lines in Hayward providing regional access to the Bay Area’s major ports. Two Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) lines traverse through the City providing residents and businesses access to the Bay Area’s major employment centers. The City is also served by AMTRAK’s Capital Corridor (passenger rail), AC Transit bus service, and the Hayward Executive Airport.

Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) provide electricity and natural gas services.5 Hayward is a member of East Bay Community Energy (EBCE) which provide customers with the option to purchase energy through renewable sources. The City works with telecommunication providers to provide infrastructure, fiber optic network, wireless networks, and broadly accessible service.

Environment
Hayward is a part of the greater San Francisco Bay Area and occupies a relatively flat stretch of land within the East Bay Area region with bay waters bordering the western edge and regional hills to the east.6 The City is split by the Hayward fault line running north to south through the downtown area.

The City is at an intersect of multiple freeways, erosion-prone landscape and subsequently experiences both natural and human-induced hazards as expanded on in the City’s Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP).

1.2 Vulnerability Assessment Methodology
The City’s Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment follows the vulnerability assessment process recommended by the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES), as documented in the 2020 California Adaptation Planning Guide (Cal APG).7 The adaptation planning process outlined by the Cal APG consists of four phases, illustrated in the graphic below, with Phase 2 detailing the vulnerability assessment process.7
City of Hayward
Hazards Element Update

4 The assessment is comprised of the following five elements that parallel the Phase 2 Cal APG steps to assess vulnerability:

1. Exposure. The nature and degree to which a climate stress or hazard occurs within the City’s geography.

2. Sensitivity. The aspects of the community (i.e., populations, community structures and infrastructure, parks and open space, and services) most affected by the identified climate hazards.

3. Potential Impacts. The nature and degree to which different aspects of the community can be affected by a given stressor, change, or disturbance.

4. Adaptive Capacity. The ability to cope with extreme events, to make changes, or to transform to a greater extent, including the ability to moderate potential damages and to take advantage of opportunities.

5. Vulnerability Analysis. The overall risk to different aspects of the community of potential impacts given their adaptive capacity.

Data Sources
The vulnerabilities to community assets as well as the outlining of relevant climate hazards to the County were sourced using the following data sources and tools, many of which are recommended within the California Adaptation Planning guide.

Climate Model Projections
Future changes in climate presented in this assessment are based on global models. The IPCC provides several greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions scenarios to describe possible future GHG emissions and associated climate outcomes. These scenarios are termed “Representative Concentration Pathways” (RCPs) and are commonly used to explore a range of possible future climate conditions. RCP 4.5 represents a “mitigation” scenario in which collective action at the

Introduction

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 5
global scale results in the successful implementation of GHG reduction strategies. In this scenario, global emissions peak around 2040 and decline by the end of the century. RCP 8.5 represents a “high emissions” scenario in which emissions continue to rise throughout the 21st century. RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 are used in this assessment, as recommended in the Cal OES 2020 Adaptation Planning Guide.

Cal-Adapt is a tool developed by the State and is designed to assist local jurisdictions with climate change adaptation and resilience planning. It is intended to provide a consistent set of model outputs for climate assessments across the State for local and regional planning. Cal-Adapt is a web- based platform that includes climate change projections and climate impact research downscaled to the local level for different RCP scenarios. The projections are based on the extensive body of peer- reviewed climate research described in California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment which summarizes and makes state climate science actionable for resilience efforts. The University of California Berkeley’s Geospatial Innovation Facility developed and maintains the Cal-Adapt tool with oversight and funding from the California Energy Commission and California Strategic Growth Council. Climate change projections taken from Cal-Adapt for the RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 projections are assessed for temperature, precipitation and wildfire within the Local Climate Change Snapshot tool.10 These projections are used in conjunction with population and built environment data to determine the degree to which the community of Hayward is vulnerable under different climate change scenarios.

The Adapting to Rising Tides (ART) Bay Flood Shoreline Explorer was used to assess vulnerabilities related to sea level rise. The tool was developed by the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) and NOAA’s Office for Coastal Management (NOAA OCM) to map impacts of sea level rise along the Alameda County shoreline. The ART Bay Flood Shoreline Explorer maps sea level rise under a range of 1 foot through 9 feet of bay shore rise in combination with 2- year, 5-year, 10-year, 25-year, 50-year, 100-year, and King Tide storm surges. This tool was developed by the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission to be used with Ocean Protection. Sea level rise was assessed using 1.9-foot and 6.9-foot scenarios from the ART Bay Flood Shoreline Explorer, which approximately corresponds to recommended projections under the State of California Sea-Level Rise Guidance for the San Francisco Bay Area.14 California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment, San Francisco Bay Are Regional Summary Report was used to further understand regional changes that may affect the City both directly and indirectly. This report presents an overview of climate science, specific strategies to adapt to climate impacts, and key research gaps needed to spur additional progress on safeguarding San Francisco Bay Area Region from climate change.

The data in Cal-Adapt is combined with information from the California Fourth Climate Change Assessment and the ART Bay Flood Shoreline Explorer to model future changes in specific types of hazards. Data from these sources was drawn on to round out projections and information on several individual hazards not fully expanded on within the Cal-Adapt tool.

Identifying Sensitive Communities
The California Healthy Places Index (HPI) is an online mapping tool that reports on community conditions that are known to predict health outcomes and life expectancy. The tool was prepared by the Public Health Alliance of Southern California, a collaborative of local health departments in California. HPI displays 25 community characteristics at various legislative boundaries, including census tracts, and city and county boundaries. The community characteristics relate to the following Policy Action Areas: economic, education, housing, health care access, neighborhood, clean City of Hayward
Hazards Element Update

6 environment, transportation, and social factors. HPI applies a relative percentile score across all census tracts in California using statistical modeling techniques based on the relationship of the Policy Action Areas to life expectancy at birth. Low percentile scores reflect unhealthy conditions.

This report uses a percentile score of 50 or lower city-wide to determine vulnerable communities.

Hayward Local Hazard Mitigation Plan is used to for general information on existing processes and plans that are already in place regarding climate change. The Hazard Mitigation Plan also was used in determining Hayward’s adaptive capacity by pulling existing hazard planning and identified vulnerabilities into the analysis.

Exposure

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 7
2 Exposure
Climate change is a global phenomenon that can impact local health, natural resources, infrastructure, emergency response, and many other aspects of society. Projected changes to the climate are dependent on location. The Cal-Adapt tool provides climate data from global scale models that have been localized (downscaled). For the purposes of this report, the term “climate driver” is defined as a trend in average conditions over time such as temperature, precipitation, and sea level rise. The Climate Hazards section provides information on projected changes to extreme heat, drought, wildfire, landslides and Bayshore flooding as influenced by climate drivers. The interplay between climate drivers and hazards is understood through compounding risks and cascading impacts defined below.

Compounding Risks
Risks associated with specific aspects of climate change (i.e., extreme temperatures, sea level rise, etc.) are often assessed and planned for separately. However, the timing and sequencing of more than one type of risk can increase the potential for new or more amplified hazard events and conditions. For example, an extreme precipitation event occurring after a wildfire event increasing the severity of a landslide hazard. Compounding risks, as presented in the IPCC report on Changes in Climate Extremes, can include: “(a) extremes that occur simultaneously or successively; (b) extremes combined with background conditions that amplify their overall impact; or (c) extremes that result from combinations of ‘average’ events.”8
Cascading Impacts
Cascading impacts are viewed as compromised infrastructure or critical service disruptions (e.g., power outages), caused by a climate-related event. The IPCC describes cascading impacts within Chapter 6 of the 2019 Special Report, “Extremes, Abrupt Changes and Managing Risks.”9 These cascading impacts can increase the severity of a climate event by affecting multiple sectors of the community. For Hayward these cascading impacts can be viewed and sourced based on linkages between services or in the way a hazard sets off a chain of related impacts. An example would be increased precipitation or intense precipitation leading to a cascading risk of downed communication networks. Hazards that cascade into infrastructure such as above ground power lines damage and subsequently impact public health, safety, and communications.

2.1 Climate Drivers
In Hayward the climate drivers of concern include Temperature, Precipitation, and Sea Level Rise.

The following section summarizes projected changes to the identified climate drivers.

Temperature
Under the RCP 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios, the average maximum temperature projected for Hayward is expected to rise between 4.4° Fahrenheit (F) and 7.3°F by the end of the 21st century when compared to a 30-year average baseline of 1961 to 1990.10 The average minimum temperature is expected to rise between 4.1°F (RCP 4.5) and 7.2°F (RCP 8.5) by the end of the 21st century.10 These City of Hayward
Hazards Element Update

8 projections indicate a shift in temperature maximums and minimums for an overall warmer climate range in Hayward.

Figure 3 and Figure 4 below show the observed trends and projections for the annual average maximum and minimum temperatures in Hayward. The purple line on the graphs shows the high emissions scenario (RCP 8.5), the blue line shows the medium emissions scenario (RCP 4.5), and the grey line illustrates the current trend (observed). The shaded areas indicate the range for the emissions scenario. For example, the blue shaded area represents the range of data for the medium emissions scenario (RCP 4.5). Temperature as a climate driver influences many hazards discussed in the Climate Hazards section below, including extreme heat, drought, and wildfire.

Figure 3 Historical and Projected Average Maximum Temperature in Hayward (Graph)10

Exposure

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 9
Figure 4 Historical and Projected Average Minimum Temperature in Hayward10

Precipitation
Increased intensity of precipitation events are expected for the greater San Francisco Bay Area, including Hayward through the end of the century.12 Precipitation in the Bay Area region is variable from year to year, which obscures trends in projected annual precipitation totals.12 Average precipitation values for Hayward range between a decrease in total precipitation of 1.5 percent to an increase in total precipitation by 4 percent.10 Climate change may create a small tendency towards a wetter Hayward, but the projected trends for precipitation totals remain small compared to the year-to-year variability that characterizes California’s climate. As a result, projected changes to precipitation extremes are of greater significance than changes in precipitation averages. The projections show that there will be more dry periods punctuated by increased precipitation intensities of the largest storms or wet periods, producing little net change in precipitation totals but more extreme conditions. The amount of precipitation from the largest storms is projected to increase by 6-37 percent compared to the historical averages by end of century.10 In Hayward, the modeled historical annual precipitation baseline is a 30-year average of approximately 18.9 inches between 1961 and 1990. Mid-century projections show changes in annual total precipitation ranging from a decrease of 0.3 inches (RCP 4.5) to an increase of 0.2 inches (RCP 8.5). By the end of the century, annual precipitation is expected to increase between 0.2 inches (RCP 4.5) to 0.8 inches (RCP 8.5).

Maximum 1-day precipitation models for Hayward have a current 30-year average of approximately

1.4 inches. By the middle of the century maximum precipitation event averages will range between approximately 1.47 inches (RCP 4.5) and 1.5 inches (RCP 8.5). These numbers increase even more by the end of the century with projections ranging between 1.52 inches (RCP 4.5) and 1.65 inches (RCP

8.5).

City of Hayward
Hazards Element Update

10 Figure 5 and Figure 6 show the historical and projected changes in annual precipitation and maximum 1-day precipitation, respectively. Though these averages are expected to increase, observed changes within the region have shown multi-year periods of small amounts of precipitation offset by atmospheric river events of increasing intensity.12 Figure 5 Historical and Projected Average Annual Precipitation in Hayward10

Figure 6 Historical and Projected Average Maximum 1-Day Precipitation in Hayward10

Sea Level Rise (SLR)
By the end of the century, the median projected SLR is 4.5 feet in the San Francisco Bay Area.12 The region could experience up to a maximum SLR of approximately 9.5 feet by the end of the century.12 SLR studies depict large ranges in part due to unpredictability of ice sheet melting capacity and

Exposure

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 11
water expansion rates as the oceans warm through the end of the century.11 Observed changes in SLR show a 8-inch rise in the San Francisco Bay Area over the previous century.12 The rate of SLR is expected to increase from observed changes. Modeling SLR under different projections helps in visualizing anticipated changes affecting the City. Data available within the Adapting to Rising Tides Bay Shoreline Flood Explorer depicts various scenarios of SLR for both Hayward and the greater Bay Area.13 Per the State of California Sea Level Rise Guidance document published by the Ocean Protection Council, this assessment uses SLR estimates of 1.9-feet by 2050 and 6.9-feet by 2100.14 Figure 7 shows 1.9 feet of SLR by 2050 in blue and 6.9 feet of SLR by 2100 in green. The lighter the shade of blue or green the shallower the area is. According to these projections, by 2050 the Water Pollution Control Facility will be located within the SLR hazard zone and by 2100 Fire Station #4 will be located in the SLR hazard zone.

City of Hayward
Hazards Element Update

12 Figure 7 Sea Level Rise in Hayward through 2050 and 210013

Exposure

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 13

2.2 Climate Hazards
Most climate hazards of concern for Hayward and the surrounding region have only minimally impacted the community in the past. Climate drivers (temperature, precipitation, and sea level rise) are expected to influence the frequency, duration, and magnitude of the following climate hazards:
▪ Extreme Heat
▪ Drought
▪ Wildfire
▪ Landslides
▪ Bayshore Flooding
Extreme Heat
Extreme heat events are defined as days in which the daily maximum temperature exceeds the 98thpercentile value of the historical average. For Hayward, extreme heat days occur when the maximum temperature is above 90.5°F. There has been an observed average of 4 extreme heat days annually from 1961 to 1990.10 The intensity and frequency of extreme heat days is projected to increase in Hayward. There is a dramatic increase from the observed average of 4 extreme heat days annually since 1950, to 2050 mid-century projections of 15 days annually (RCP 8.5) and end of century projections of 28 days annually (RCP 8.5). While there have been no Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) or Cal OES declared heat disasters in the city to date, extreme heat poses an especially hazardous risk to the City as there is a lack of cooling infrastructure and extreme heat conditions can result in increased health risks for the City’s vulnerable populations.18 Extreme heat without adequate cooling infrastructure exacerbates health impacts across all populations. This comes into effect especially with higher occurrences of warm nights, shown in Figure 9, when the population is given little break for the body to cool. By the end of the century warm nights are expected to increase from a 30-year historical average of 4 nights annually to anywhere between 49 nights (RCP 4.5) and 96 nights (RCP 8.5).10
City of Hayward
Hazards Element Update

14 Figure 8 Historical and Projected Annual Average of Extreme Heat Days in Hayward10

Figure 9 Historical and Projected Annual Average of Warm Nights in Hayward10

Drought
Climate change will increase the likelihood that low-precipitation years will coincide with above- average temperature years.12 Warming temperatures increase seasonal dryness and the likelihood of drought due. This is due to a decreased supply of moisture and increased atmospheric demand for moisture as evaporation from bare soils and evapotranspiration from plants increases.12 The increased moisture loss from soils and vegetation amplifies dryness during periods without

Exposure

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 15
precipitation. In California’s highly variable climate setting, climate models project the number of dry years to increase.

Drought is defined within this report using the
Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) as well as
the National Drought Mitigation Center five
drought categories ranging from least to most
severe drought conditions of D0 to D4.10 Both
metrics were used in producing analysis of drought
as it relates to Hayward. The duration of dry spells
is projected to vary based on emissions scenario.

Like patterns in precipitation some of the annual
variability is obscured within 30-year averages.

Despite this, the clear trend is for maximum lengths of dry spells to increase through the end of century. By mid-century dry spells are expected to increase between 7 days (RCP 4.5) and 10 days (RCP 8.5). By the end of the 21st century dry spells are expected to increase between 8 days (RCP

4.5) and 13 days (RCP 8.5). Both ranges can be found within Figure 8.

Additionally, the Keetch- Byram Drought Index (KBDI) levels are expected to increase as well. This KBDI is a proxy measure of wildfire plausibility through projections of how dry the soil is in an area.

By using the KBDI climate indicator it is possible to project wildfire risk, but it is more direct in indicating drought conditions. In Figure 11 the KBDI projections show an increase from low drought conditions in the 0-200 range to a 200-400 level increase.10

Figure 10 Historical and Projected Changes to Maximum Dry Spell in Hayward10

Recent Drought Hazards
Historically there have been ten recorded
multi-year droughts affecting Alameda
County. The most recent occurrences
were 2007-2009, 2012-2016 and 2021-
present; all have been statewide in scope
with the most recent being the driest 4-
year period on record for California.1
City of Hayward
Hazards Element Update

16 Figure 11 KBDI Historical and Projected Changes in Hayward10

Wildfire
The size and severity of wildfires are expected to increase substantially in the coming decades.12 The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Fourth National Climate Assessment, released in 2018, reported that the area burned by wildfire in the southwestern United States from 1984 to 2015 was twice what would have burned had climate change not occurred.15 The areas surrounding Hayward have some very high fire hazard severity zones (VHFHSZ) mainly within the East Bay parks and hills that characterizes the eastern edge of East Bay Area Cities and Areas. Hayward has a VHFHSZ bordering the boundaries of the City shown in Figure 12. This zone is not within City limits but general proximity to this as well as other regional VHFHSZ’s place Hayward at risk for health

Exposure

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 17
hazards related to wildfire smoke. There have been no historical wildfires within the Hayward city limits. The area burned by wildfires throughout the state has increased. If higher temperatures continue to be accompanied by an increase in the incidence and extent of large wildfires, regional air quality could worsen affecting Hayward, the region, and the State.

City of Hayward
Hazards Element Update

18 Figure 12 Fire Hazard Severity Zones in the Hayward Area

Exposure

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 19
Landslides
Triggered by extreme bouts of precipitation, the susceptibility of Hayward to landslides is projected to increase as precipitation variability increases.12 Landslides for the area are plausible given that eastern Hayward is a known landslide-prone area.5 The projections of rain-induced landslides are inconsistent. However, it is reasonable to assume a likely increase in landslides because of increases in maximum daily precipitation through the end of the century under both RCP 4.5 and 8.5.12 Bayshore Flooding
As shown in the SLR scenarios, the Hayward Shoreline is exposed to immediate effects and displacement associated with climate change. Though the projections have a clearly defined area of impact, a secondary hazard associated with SLR is Bayshore flooding brought about by intense storm surges. With increased sea levels in the greater Bay Area and particularly along the western edge of the City, the range of impact can stretch much further inland given 25-year, 50-year and 100-year storm surges as well as King Tide occurrences. Under each of these instances the scope of adversely impacted areas in Hayward increases with inundation zones due to Bayshore flooding.

Figure 13 shows hazard zone of 2050 SLR along with a 50-year storm surge to better understand Bayshore flooding as it impacts the community. According to the Healthy Places Index (HPI) 4.78 percent of people in Hayward occupy sea level rise inundation areas placing the City in the 32.7 percentile for California.16 This statistic was developed under the conditions of a 100-year flood event and expected sea level rise through the end of the 21st century. By 2050 the Water Pollution Control Facility as well as the entire southwest portion of the City will be inundated as a result of Bayshore flooding under a 50 year storm surge scenario. The southwest inundation area is predominately state-owned land consisting of the Eden Landing Ecological Reserve.

City of Hayward
Hazards Element Update

20 Figure 13 2050 Projected Bayshore SLR in Hayward with a 50-Year Storm Surge13

Exposure

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 21
Groundwater Hazards
Hayward’s Shoreline is susceptible to groundwater inundation as sea levels rise. Due to the City’s susceptibility to coastal flooding and general inundation from sea level rise there is a cascading risk of rising groundwater.17 As the sea rises, groundwater is pushed to the surface or closer to the surface, referred to as water table at surface. Groundwater that is up to 3.3 feet below ground surface can mobilize pollutants, stress pipes, and affect roadbeds as the sea rises. Between 3.3 feet and 6.6 feet below ground surface the groundwater shifts can weaken structural foundations, affect basements, begin to affect pipes, and amplify the potential for liquefaction (for example, during an earthquake). Deeper than 6.6 feet below ground surface the groundwater changes resulting from sea level rise can negatively affect deep basements in buildings, structural foundations, septic systems, and contaminants in the ground.17 Projections for 2050 groundwater levels can be found in Figure 14 while projections for 2100 can be found in Figure 15. The Marine Inundation zone parallels the same projections used in the other hazard figures for sea level rise. The main changes to be observed are changing levels of surface table water as well as greater areas of groundwater that has been brought up to the 0 to 3.3 feet below ground surface level. By 2050 Fire Station #4, Fire Station #7, Fire Station Clinic, Weekes Branch Library, Water Pollution Control Facility, and the Executive Airport are all at risk to shallow groundwater inundation.

City of Hayward
Hazards Element Update

22 Figure 14 Mid-Century Groundwater Risk in Hayward17

Exposure

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 23
Figure 15 End-Century Groundwater Risk in Hayward17

City of Hayward
Hazards Element Update

24 3 Sensitivity
While all people, facilities, and services in a community will experience climate change, some may be more affected than others. For example, individuals living with disabilities may be more at-risk to heat illness during an extreme heat event. Sensitivity to climate hazards can be influenced by several factors, including differences in individual health, age, and ability; institutional bias or exclusion from political and decision-making power; inequities in infrastructure and access to health care, economic opportunity, education, and other services; and inequities in environmental and living conditions. The following section identifies specific groups and types of built and natural assets that are sensitive to climate hazards and the specific underlying factors that are associated with their sensitivity. The points of sensitivity, or potentially affected community resources, are grouped under the following asset categories:

People

Community Structures & Infrastructure

Parks & Open Space

Services

3.1 People
The following population groups may be disproportionally harmed by the impacts of climate change in Hayward. Population demographics are determined using the California Healthy Places Index (HPI) and United States Census Bureau unless otherwise noted. ▪ Seniors. Seniors can be more vulnerable to climate change if they have limited mobility, challenges, live independently, live on fixed-incomes, and/or experience chronic health conditions. As a result, they may be less equipped to deal with adverse environmental conditions and respond effectively to adverse events.18 About 11 percent of the Hayward population is 65 and older.19 Older residents can have mobility challenges, challenges living independently, are more likely to live on a fixed-income, and experience health conditions which make them more vulnerable to climate hazards and less equipped to respond effectively when an extreme weather event occurs.
▪ Young Children. Young children in Hayward can be more vulnerable to the impacts of heat waves, air pollution, and trauma resulting from climate change, due to physiological and developmental factors. Children under 5 are rapidly growing, their lungs are developing, they breathe at a higher rate than adults, and they spend more time outdoors. According to the California Healthy Places Index, Hayward’s young children account for 7 percent of the overall population.

Sensitivity

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 25
▪ Low-Income Individuals/households. Populations that are below median income levels for Hayward as well as renters and/or housing burdened households can experience difficulty with climate change impacts due to their limited resources. Approximately 46 percent of occupied housing units in the City are rented. Renters have less control over home improvements than homeowners and may not be able to adequately protect themselves from climate hazards by retrofitting their homes. In Hayward 23 percent of low-income renters pay over 50 percent of their income on housing costs, which is above the average for California.16 This cost burden places financial stress on households, which makes it more difficult to effectively manage risk.

For example, low-income individuals and renters may not have adequate resources to use air conditioning during extreme heat events. Additionally, low-income populations are shown to have lower access to health care and healthy foods, which puts them at greater health risks associated with extreme climate events.18 Populations within Hayward living below poverty account for 8percent of the general population.6
▪ Individuals with Chronic Health Conditions. Chronic health conditions are broadly defined as conditions that last one year or more and require ongoing medical attention, or limit activities of daily living. Individuals with chronic health conditions can be at higher risk to the effects of climate change as well as general exposure to unhealthy environmental conditions. HPI scores indicate less than healthy conditions regarding the percentage of asthma ER admissions, with the city ranking higher in admissions than 94 percent of all California cities.16 The City has a higher rate of heart attack ER admissions than 87 percent of the state. Additionally, HPI scores indicate less than healthy conditions regarding life expectancy higher than 60 percent of other California cities.
▪ Pollution Burdened Individuals. The average daily amount of particulate pollution (very small particles) from diesel sources (for July) in Hayward is 30.98 kg/day. Hayward has a higher average daily amount of diesel particulate pollution than 98 percent of other California cities, making it one of the most exposed areas for individuals with pre-existing respiratory health issues in the state. Since diesel particulate matter is small, it can reach deep into people’s lungs, increasing the risk of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, poor birth outcomes, and premature death.
▪ Individuals Experiencing Homelessness. Alameda County accounts for a substantial portion of California’s homeless population. Based on information provided by EveryOne Counts within the 2022 Point in Time Count of unsheltered and sheltered individuals, Hayward has 114 sheltered and 267 unsheltered homeless individuals.20
▪ Non-white Individuals. Race and ethnicity can be important determinants of health impacts related to climate change as racial and ethnic minorities are more likely to live in high-risk areas, including areas with higher flooding risk and areas with fewer public transit routes.21 In addition, non-white communities experience disproportionally high levels of vulnerability to climate change, including co-morbidities, lower income, poorer physical health, language barriers, less access to vehicle ownership, less access to air conditioning, among others.18 The U.S. Census, reports that approximately 84 percent of residents in Hayward are of non-white populations.22 ▪ Non-English Speakers. The U.S. Census considers linguistically isolated households as households where no person over the age of 14 speaks English proficiently.23 People with limited English proficiency may not have access to emergency public health warnings in their native language, exacerbating climate impacts on this population.18 Less than healthy conditions regarding linguistic isolation in Hayward, approximately 24 percent of residents are considered linguistically isolated in Hayward. 24
City of Hayward
Hazards Element Update

26 3.2 Community Structures and Infrastructure
A population’s vulnerability increases exponentially when critical infrastructure is not designed, operated, and/or maintained to function effectively or can be damaged by extreme weather conditions. Climate change is expected to amplify extreme weather as described in Climate Hazards.

The following community structures within Hayward would be particularly sensitive to climate change:
▪ Municipal Buildings. City Hall, Hayward Animal Shelter, Fire Station #1-9, Two Libraries, Former Hayward Area Historical Society Building, Utilities Center, and the Water Pollution Control Facility.5
▪ Educational Facilities. The Hayward School District serves a population of around 21,000 students across 30 schools with 950 teachers.4
▪ Hospitals: Hayward’s three hospitals are the Hayward Hospital, Kindred Hospital-SF Bay Area, and St. Rose.
▪ Residential and Commercial Development. Residential development accounts for 45% of the City’s land area and commercial development accounts for 8%. There is a significant amount of industrial development within the city as well at around 19%. High densities of up to 100 units per acre can be found within the downtown area of Hayward. Commercial areas are largely retail, restaurants and services and some office space. The main sensitivity for land use is density complications in the event of an evacuation.
▪ Roadways and Transportation Facilities. Roadways and transportation facilities such as bridges and railways may be threatened by the impacts of climate change. The transportation system is sensitive to increased risk of storm flooding and coastal flooding brought on by variable precipitation, increased storm intensity, and sea level rise projected to occur in the decades ahead. These climate hazards could adversely impact the public transportation system, which is an important part of the movement of people throughout Hayward, especially for vulnerable populations that may not have access to a single passenger vehicle. Climate changes may result in increased maintenance and repair expenditures, disruptions of economic activity, interruptions of critical lifelines, and ultimately reductions in the overall quality of life for residents and businesses.

3.3 Parks and Open Spaces
Parks and open spaces serve a critical role in the health and well-being of the community. They are also vulnerable to climate changes in several ways. The following open spaces may be vulnerable to climate change impacts:
▪ Parks. Cannery Park, J.A. Lewis Park, Garin Regional Park, Mount Eden Park, East Avenue Park, Centennial Park, San Felipe Community Park, Tennyson Park, Sorensdale Park, Cherryland Park, Hayward Regional Shoreline, Weekes Community Center Park, Southgate Park, Gordon E. Oliver Eden Shores Park, Lakeridge Park, Greenwood Park, Carlos Bee Park, Birchfield Park, Kennedy Park, Don Castro Regional Recreation Area. Parks and recreation account for 2,959 acres of the Hayward planning area.4

Sensitivity

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 27
▪ Open Space. The EBRPD and the Hayward Area Recreation & Park District owns and maintains approximately 2,400 acres of open space and 8,300 acres of Baylands supporting local habitat and biodiversity.4

3.4 Services
Descriptions of municipal services were drawn from the Hayward Local Hazard Mitigation Plan adopted in 2017, unless otherwise noted. The following services may be sensitive to the impacts of climate change:
▪ Water Services: Water is provided to the City by SFPUC. The water is originally sourced from the Hetch Hetchy reservoir and the Sierra Nevada Mountain range. SFPUC has undergone multiple system improvements to reduce vulnerability and increase system redundancy for drought projections.
▪ Wastewater: The City wastewater is provided by the Utilities and Environmental Services Department. Hayward owns and operates the Water Pollution Control Facility, a 300-acre structure with multiple wastewater treatment facilities. The building has been retrofitted since being originally constructed in 1952.
▪ Power: Power services in Hayward include electricity and natural gas delivered through above and below ground utility lines from PG&E. Public Safety Power Shutoffs (PSPSs) due to high-risk conditions for fire are likely to increase in the future as climate change increases temperatures, droughts, and vegetative drying. Though Hayward is not located in a VHFHSZ, the PSPSs are facilitated for regional safety as power lines travel across all of California. Additionally, power lines are at risk to storm damage should trees fall over. ▪ Fire and Emergency Services: Fire protection and emergency services in Hayward are available through the City’s nine operational fire stations. The City of Hayward contracts with surrounding fire departments, including ACFD and Cal-Fire for fire services and fire prevention if mutual aid is required past the Hayward Fire Department (HFD) capacity. The wildland fire mitigation program is an ongoing effort due to yearly regrowth of vegetation and the nature of fire season.

The increasing frequency, severity, and extent of wildfires could strain fire and emergency services beyond the extent of their capacity.

City of Hayward
Hazards Element Update

28 4 Impacts
The relationship between climate hazards and sensitivities is illustrated through potential impacts.

As part of the Cal APG guidance within phase 2 the overlay of exposure and sensitivities clarifies impacted assets to a community. The impact of a climate hazard may extend beyond the initial direct impact. Infrastructure sectors rely on and support each other, including the workers that service the system. Rather than directly related to the climate hazard, these cascading risk factors may be directly compromised by the hazard and, in turn, lead to impacts on sensitive groups, facilities, and assets. For example, a senior may have air-conditioning to prevent heat stroke during an extreme heat event. But, if there is a power outage associate with that same extreme heat event, the senior’s air conditioning may fail, and they may experience a heat related illness. Potential impacts and cascading risk factors associated with identified climate hazards for populations, community structures and infrastructure, parks and open space, and services are described below.

4.1 Temperature
Temperature-related climate hazards identified previously in Climate Hazards include:
▪ Extreme Heat and Warm Nights
▪ Drought
▪ Increased Wildfire Risk and Reduced Air Quality
The potential impacts and cascading risk factors across sensitivity types are summarized in Table 1 below.

Table 1 Potential Impacts and Cascading Risk Factors related to Temperature Sensitivity
Type Sensitivity Impact Description Cascading Risk Factors

Seniors
Vulnerability associated
with mobility limitations,
challenges living
independently, those on
fixed-incomes, and those
with chronic health
conditions
Heat: Vulnerable populations can
experience heat-related illnesses, such as
heat stress and dehydration, both of
which can be fatal. Non-white minority
groups in the United States have
reportedly higher morbidity and mortality
rates associated with hot weather, which
can be associated with more exposed
occupations and housing.25
Wildfire: There is risk of injury, death, or
financial hardship if personal property is
damaged.26 Smoke conditions for
vulnerable populations with chronic
health conditions can impact health and
safety.

Drought: There is a risk of reduced access
to water for low-income households
unable to accommodate increased utility
costs.

Power outages could expose
seniors reliant on power to operate
medical devices and maintain cool
indoor conditions during a heat
wave. Power outages could disrupt
public transit, limiting access to
health care facilities for seniors.

Young Children
Vulnerability associated
with physical and mental
development and time
spent outdoors
Power outages could expose young
children who attend school,
afterschool, and daycare with one
or more risk factors to health
impacts from extreme heat. if the
facilities are ill-equipped to
maintain safe temperatures.

Low Income Individual &
Households
Vulnerability associated
with limited financial
resources and access to
services
Power outages could expose
renters with one or more risk
factors to health impacts from
extreme heat if the units are ill-
equipped to maintain safe
temperatures.

Impacts

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 29
Sensitivity
Type Sensitivity Impact Description Cascading Risk Factors

Compromised public transit
options could introduce additional
health risks or reduced mobility
options.

Individuals with Chronic
Health Conditions
Vulnerability associated
with mobility limitations,
challenges living
independently
Power outages could expose
individuals with chronic health
conditions with one or more risk
factors to health impacts from
extreme heat if facilities are ill-
equipped to maintain safe
temperatures.

Reduced air quality associated
with wildfires presents a significant
risk to vulnerable populations.

Individuals experiencing
Homelessness
Vulnerability associated
with mobility limitations,
limited financial
resources and access to
services, physical
exposure to hazards.

Power Outages may cause shelters
to be compromised or
overpopulated.

Reduced air quality associated
with wildfires presents a significant
risk to vulnerable populations.

Non-white Individuals
and Households
Vulnerability associated
with mobility limitations,
limited financial
resources and access to
services
Power outages could expose non-
white individuals and households
with one or more risk factors to
health impacts from extreme heat
if the units are ill-equipped to
maintain safe temperatures.

Compromised public transit
options could introduce additional
health risks or reduced mobility
options.

Non-English Speakers
Vulnerability associated
with linguistic isolation,
mobility limitations,
limited financial
resources and access to
services
Power outages could expose non-
English speakers with one or more
risk factors to health impacts from
extreme heat if the units are ill-
equipped to maintain safe
temperatures.

Linguistic Isolation for members of
ethnic minority language groups
can be excluded from access to
English-based media and health
messages.21 This can affect
individuals’ ability to follow
weather reports and instructions
from government organizations
and service providers, including
information aimed at increasing
awareness and reducing the impact
of extreme heat.21
Municipal Buildings
City of Hayward
Hazards Element Update

30 Sensitivity
Type Sensitivity Impact Description Cascading Risk Factors

Vulnerability associated
with structural
preparedness and ability
to provide services
Wildfire: There is a risk of structural
damage in the event of a fire for any
development within the WUI bordering
the VHFHSZ to the east of city limits.

Heat: There is a risk of structural damage
from buckled rail ties. Impacts on the road
network would include an increase in
rutting and potholes and can place stress
on bridge joints, increasing maintenance
costs. Extreme heat can also limit
construction activities.

Power outages could limit service
provisions from community
structures and infrastructure with
one or more risk factors that are ill-
equipped without backup systems.

Educational Facilities
Vulnerability associated
with structural
preparedness and ability
to provide services
Hospitals
Vulnerability associated
with structural
preparedness and ability
to provide services
Residential, and
Commercial
Development
Vulnerability associated
with structural
preparedness
Roadways and
Transportation Facilities
Vulnerability associated
with structural
preparedness and ability
to provide services

Parks
Vulnerability associated
with direct exposure to
hazards

Heat: The primary impacts are heat-
related stressed or dead flora and fauna.

Extreme heat can lead to ecosystem-scale
shifts. Vegetation is more likely to
experience heat stress and drying, species’
habitat ranges may shift, some pests can
proliferate more easily with warmer
temperatures, and some plants and
animals ill-suited to the new warmer
conditions may suffer increased mortality
rates.12 illnesses, such as heat stress and
dehydration, both of which can be fatal.

Wildfire: There is risk of wildlife to move
to more habitable areas across the WUI.12
Drought: There is a risk of stressed
vegetation in relation to increased
drought conditions.

Irrigation supply can be affected by
drought conditions, irrigated park
facilities may receive less water,
which may further contribute to
stressed or dead vegetation.

Urban heat island effects will
increase with lack of and/or
damaged parks and open spaces.

Open Space
Vulnerability associated
with direct exposure to
hazards

Impacts

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 31
Sensitivity
Type Sensitivity Impact Description Cascading Risk Factors

Water and Wastewater
Services
Vulnerability associated
with structural
preparedness and ability
to provide services
Wildfire. The primary impacts include
damage to distribution infrastructure
from wildfire in identified high-risk
locations.27
Service Reliability may decline
from increased demand from
higher temperatures which place
additional burden on water
suppliers.

Power Outages can also affect
water distribution.

Wildfire can be a cascading risk
factor for water services as it
requires adequate water reliability
in a larger number of areas at
higher frequencies.

Power
Vulnerability associated
with structural
preparedness, direct
exposure to hazards, and
ability to provide
services
Heat. The primary impact is overload
failures to the grid if it is overwhelmed by
demand from increased temperature.

Wildfire. Distribution infrastructure can
also be damaged from wildfire in
identified high-risk locations.28
Services Reliability can be a
cascading risk factor from heat
stress and wildfire damages
affecting all reliant populations,
infrastructure, and service lines.

Cooling of buildings and
subsequently people can be
impacted because of power
outages.

Fire and Emergency
Services
Vulnerability associated
with ability to provide
services
The primary impacts include heat-related
illnesses, such as heat stress and
dehydration to emergency responders,
both of which can be fatal. There is also
risk of death from wildfire in identified
high-risk locations.

Service Strain from increased
frequency of wildfire and heat
hazards can strain Fire and
emergency services ability to
provide community protection.

Power outages can isolate
populations making it more
difficult for fire and emergency
services to communicate with
impacted populations and areas.

Structural Damage to the water
distribution system can
compromise fire and emergency
services.

4.2 Precipitation
Changes in precipitation can lead to the following climate hazards:
▪ Extreme precipitation
▪ Storm flooding
▪ Landslides
The potential impacts and cascading risk factors across sensitivities are summarized in Table 2.

City of Hayward
Hazards Element Update

32 Table 2 Potential Impacts and Cascading Risk Factors related to Precipitation Sensitivity
Type Sensitivity Impact Description Cascading Impacts

Seniors
Vulnerability associated
with mobility limitations,
challenges living
independently, those on
fixed-incomes, and those
with chronic health
conditions
Storm Flooding. The primary impacts include
injury, death, or financial hardship if personal
property is damaged from inundation.

Extreme Precipitation. There is a risk of injury
or death from falling debris/storm damage.

May face financial hardship in repairing
property damage, reduced mobility following a
storm, or impaired living conditions if property
is damaged.18
Landslides. There is risk of injury, death, or
financial hardship if personal property is
damaged.

Power outages could
expose seniors with one
or more risk factors to
health impacts from
flooding if facilities are ill-
equipped to deal with
inundation and structural
damage.

Compromised public
transit options could
introduce additional
health risks or reduced
mobility.

Young Children
Vulnerability associated
with physical and mental
development and time
spent outdoors.

Power outages could
expose young children
with one or more risk
factors to health impacts
from flooding and
landslides if facilities or
schools are ill-equipped to
deal with inundation and
structural damage.

Low Income Individual &
Households
Vulnerability associated
with limited financial
resources and access to
services and ability to
affect building
maintenance.

Power outages could
expose populations with
one or more risk factors
to impacts from flooding
and landslides if property
is ill-equipped to deal with
inundation and structural
damage.

Compromised public
transit options could
introduce additional risks
or reduced mobility.

Individuals with Chronic
Health Conditions
Vulnerability associated
with mobility limitations,
challenges living
independently
Power outages could
expose individuals with
chronic health conditions
to impacts from flooding
and landslides if property
is ill-equipped to deal with
inundation and structural
damage.

Compromised public
transit options could
introduce additional risks
or reduced mobility.

Impacts

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 33
Individuals experiencing
Homelessness
Vulnerability associated
with mobility limitations,
limited financial
resources and access to
services, physical
exposure to hazards.

Shelters may be
compromised or
overpopulated because of
power outages or storm
damage when homeless
are seeking shelter during
a heavy rain event.

Compromised public
transit options could
introduce additional risks
or reduced mobility.

Non-white Individuals
and Households
Vulnerability associated
with mobility limitations,
limited financial
resources and access to
services
Power outages could
expose populations with
one or more risk factors
to impacts from flooding
and landslides if facilities
or schools are ill-equipped
to deal with inundation
and structural damage.

Compromised public
transit options could
introduce additional risks
or reduced mobility.

Non-English Speakers
Vulnerability associated
with linguistic isolation,
mobility limitations,
limited financial
resources and access to
services
Power outages could
expose populations with
one or more risk factors
to impacts from flooding
and landslides if facilities
or schools are ill-equipped
to deal with inundation
and structural damage.

Compromised public
transit options could
introduce additional risks
or reduced mobility.

Municipal Buildings
Vulnerability associated
with structural
preparedness and ability
to provide services Flooding. The primary impacts include structural damage from inundation for
buildings ill equipped and within the bounds of
storm flooded areas.

Extreme Precipitation. There is risk of
structural damage from increased extreme
precipitation events including falling debris.

There is also a risk of mold within structures
that have been inundated.

Landslides. There is risk of structural damage
in areas of debris flow.

Power outages could limit
service provisions from
community structures and
infrastructure with one or
more risk factors that are
ill-equipped without
backup power systems.

Evacuation Preparedness.

Buildings not well
equipped to deal with
precipitation that are
expected as evacuation
locations may have
reduced ability to provide
critical and essential
services to residents.

Educational Facilities
Vulnerability associated
with structural
preparedness and ability
to provide services
Hospitals
Vulnerability associated
with structural
preparedness and ability
to provide services
Residential, and
Commercial
Development

City of Hayward
Hazards Element Update

34 Vulnerability associated
with structural
preparedness
Roadways and
Transportation Facilities
Vulnerability associated
with structural
preparedness and ability
to provide services
Flooding. The primary impacts include
structural damage from inundation for
roadways and facilities ill equipped and within
the bounds of storm flooded areas.

Extreme Precipitation. There is risk of
structural damage from increased extreme
precipitation events including erosion,
washouts, and sinkholes.

Landslides. There is risk of structural damage
in areas of debris flow.

Service Dependencies for
emergency services,
schools, hospitals, general
transportation are all
reliant on roadway
reliability and may
experience delays in
service from roadway and
transportation closures.

Economic Loss. Locally
there is the potential for
local economic losses
associated with loss of
mobility.

Parks
Vulnerability associated
with direct exposure to
hazards
Flooding. The primary impacts include damage
from inundation within the bounds of storm
flooded areas.

Extreme Precipitation. There is risk of damage
from increased extreme precipitation events
including erosion, washouts, and sinkholes.

Landslides. There is risk of damage in areas of
debris flow from.

Accessibility to parks and
open spaces may be
affected by erosion,
landslides and storm
damages which has been
linked to declines in
community health.

Habitat displacement for
flora and fauna may occur
due to inhabitability of
damaged parks and open
spaces.

Open Space
Vulnerability associated
with direct exposure to
hazards

Water and Wastewater
Services
Vulnerability associated
with structural
preparedness and ability
to provide services
Flooding. The primary impacts include
structural damage from inundation for delivery
equipment ill equipped and within the bounds
of storm flood prone areas.

Extreme Precipitation. May disrupt or damage
water supply infrastructure in addition to
flooding and damage, transmission lines,
wastewater treatment facilities, culverts, and
canals are likely to be challenged, with
associated service and business interruptions,
releases of untreated wastewater, and
structural damages
Landslides. There is risk of structural damage
in areas of debris flow from landslides/
mudflows that assist in water or wastewater
delivery.

Services Reliability can be
a cascading risk factor
from flooding,
precipitation, and
landslides affecting all
reliant populations,
infrastructure, and service
lines. Stormwater
drainage systems may
become overburdened by
increases in runoff,
particularly during highly
productive storms,
causing flooding and
potentially damaging this
infrastructure.29

Impacts

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 35
Power
Vulnerability associated
with structural
preparedness, direct
exposure to hazards, and
ability to provide
services
Flooding. Impacts include electrical substations
or natural gas transmission pipelines being
damaged from flooding.

Extreme Precipitation. There is a risk of above
ground power line infrastructure damage from
intense storms and extreme precipitation
Landslides. Damages can occur in the form of
above ground utility lines.

Services Reliability can be
a cascading risk factor
from flooding,
precipitation, and
landslides affecting all
reliant populations,
infrastructure, and service
lines.

Fire and Emergency
Services
Vulnerability associated
with ability to provide
services
Flooding. The primary impacts include injury,
death, or financial hardship if personal
property is damaged from inundation.

Extreme Precipitation. There is a risk of injury
or death from falling debris/storm damage.

May face financial hardship in repairing
property damage, reduced mobility following a
storm, or impaired living conditions if property
is damaged.18
Landslides. There is risk of injury, death, or
financial hardship if personal property is
damaged.

Service Strain from
increased frequency of
increased precipitation
hazards can strain
emergency services ability
to provide community
protection.

Power outages can isolate
populations making it
more difficult for fire and
emergency services to
communicate with
impacted populations and
areas.

Structural Damage to the
water distribution system
can compromise fire and
emergency service
abilities.

4.3 Sea Level Rise
Bayshore Flooding is the climate hazard associated with sea level rise identified in Climate Hazards.

The potential impacts and cascading risk factors across sensitivities are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3 Potential Impacts and Cascading Risk Factors related to Bayshore Flooding Sensitivity
Type Sensitivity Impact Description Cascading Impacts

Seniors
Vulnerability associated
with mobility limitations,
challenges living
independently, those on
fixed-incomes, and those
with chronic health
conditions
Flooding. The primary impacts include injury,
death, or financial hardship if personal
property is damaged.

Power outages could
expose seniors with one
or more risk factors to
health impacts from
extreme heat if facilities
are ill-equipped to
maintain safe
temperatures.

Compromised public
transit options could
introduce additional
health risks or reduced
mobility.

City of Hayward
Hazards Element Update

36 Sensitivity
Type Sensitivity Impact Description Cascading Impacts
Young Children
Vulnerability associated
with physical and mental
development and time
spent outdoors
Power outages could
expose young children
who attend school,
afterschool, and daycare
with one or more risk
factors to impacts from
flooding if the facilities
are ill-equipped to handle
storm surges and
increased inundation of
more areas.

Low Income Individual
& Households
Vulnerability associated
with limited financial
resources and access to
services
Power outages could
expose low-income
individuals and household
that are ill-equipped to
maintain safety during a
storm surge inundation
event.

Compromised public
transit options could
introduce additional
health risks or reduced
mobility.

Individuals with Chronic
Health Conditions
Vulnerability associated
with mobility limitations,
challenges living
independently
Power outages could
expose individuals with
one or more risk factors
to health impacts from
flooding that are not
prepared for inundation.

Compromised public
transit options could
introduce additional
health risks or reduced
mobility.

Individuals experiencing
Homelessness
Vulnerability associated
with mobility limitations,
limited financial
resources and access to
services, physical
exposure to hazards
Compromised public
transit options could
introduce additional
health risks or reduced
mobility.

Shelters may be
compromised or
overpopulated because of
power outages.

Non-white Individuals
and Households
Vulnerability associated
with mobility limitations,
limited financial
resources and access to
services
Flooding. Primary impacts include damages to
personal property, loss of home/living space,
and financial hardship. Non-White Households
and Individuals are more likely to live in high-
risk geographies such as those who would
experience Bayshore flooding.18
Power outages could
expose individuals with
one or more risk factors
to health impacts from
flooding that are not
prepared for inundation.

Compromised public
transit options could
introduce additional
Impacts

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 37
Sensitivity
Type Sensitivity Impact Description Cascading Impacts
health risks or reduced
mobility.

Non-English Speakers
Vulnerability associated
with linguistic isolation,
mobility limitations,
limited financial
resources and access to
services
Flooding. Primary impacts include damages to
personal property, loss of home/living space,
and financial hardship. Linguistically Isolated
communities may lack access to information to
prepare, mitigate, and respond to coastal
floods.

Power outages could
expose individuals with
one or more risk factors
to health impacts from
flooding that are not
prepared for inundation.

Compromised public
transit options could
introduce additional
health risks or reduced
mobility.

Municipal Buildings
Vulnerability associated
with structural
preparedness and ability
to provide services
Flooding. The Southwest portion of Hayward is
expected to be flooded by 2050 between the
92 and 880 Freeways including all service areas
and potential satellite facilities.

Power outages could limit
service provisions from
community structures and
infrastructure with one or
more risk factors that are
ill-equipped without
backup power systems.

Educational Facilities
Vulnerability associated
with structural
preparedness and ability
to provide services
Hospitals
Vulnerability associated
with structural
preparedness and ability
to provide services
Residential, and
Commercial
Development
Vulnerability associated
with structural
preparedness
Roadways and
Transportation Facilities
Vulnerability associated
with structural
preparedness and ability
to provide services
Flooding. General inundation of roadways to
the western edge of the City such as Enterprise
Ave and Huntwood Ave within the SLR and
Bayshore flooding hazard zones is projected to
occur by the year 2050.13 Additional impacted
infrastructure includes the Hayward San-Mateo
Bridge.

Service Reliability.

Decreased access to
transportation services
like BART could isolate
whole populations and
reduce the flow of critical
good and services during
the event of Bayshore
flooding.

Impacts

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 1

Parks
Vulnerability associated
with direct exposure to
hazards

Flooding. The entirety of the western open
spaces and Baylands are expected to be
inundated by the year 2050.13
Accessibility to parks and
open spaces may be
affected by inundation
and damages which has
been linked to declines in
community health.

Habitat displacement for
flora and fauna may occur
due to inhabitability of
damaged parks and open
spaces.

Community Health.

Inundation of most parks
and open spaces
decreases recreation and
access to greenspace for
the community which has
associated with decrease
general health.33
Open Space
Vulnerability associated
with direct exposure to
hazards

Water and Wastewater
Services
Vulnerability associated
with structural
preparedness and ability
to provide services
Flooding. Hayward’s Water Pollution Control
Facility is expected to be inundated through
SLR.13
Services Reliability can be
a cascading risk factor
from flooding affecting all
reliant populations,
infrastructure, and service
lines.

Power
Vulnerability associated
with structural
preparedness, direct
exposure to hazards, and
ability to provide
services
Flooding. Utility lines, substations, and other
power infrastructure could be damaged by
Bayshore flooding.

Services Reliability can be
a cascading risk factor
from flooding affecting all
reliant populations,
infrastructure, and service
lines.

Fire and Emergency
Services
Vulnerability associated
with ability to provide
services
Flooding. The primary impacts include
structural damage from inundation for delivery
equipment ill equipped and within the bounds
of flood prone areas including Fire Station #4
which will be inundated by SLR and Bayshore
Flooding by the year 2050.13
Service Strain from
increased frequency of
increased precipitation
hazards can strain
emergency services ability
to provide community
protection.

Power outages can isolate
populations making it
more difficult for fire and
emergency services to
communicate with
impacted populations and
areas.

Structural Damage to the
water distribution system
can compromise fire and
emergency service
abilities.

City of Hayward
Hazards Element Update

2 5 Adaptive Capacity
Adaptive capacity is the ability to adjust to the consequences of climate change. This section summarizes the ways in which the City currently manages for the negative impacts of climate change. Types of adaptive capacity include adjustments in behavior, resources, and technologies.7Error! Bookmark not defined. The City has already taken several steps to increase the community’s adaptive capacity, which include encouraging water preservation and conservation, promoting renewable energy and energy conservation, and coordinating with regional emergency services across the county. The following section provides an overview of the City’s existing capacity to adapt to climate change organized by county coordination and assistance, and city-specific capacity. The organization of this section is meant to inform the Hazards Element update by identifying policy gaps around adaptive capacity.

5.1 Regional and Local Coordination and Assistance
Coordination and assistance between governing bodies is foundational to a city’s adaptive capacity.

Though operating on a municipal scale, Hayward is part of a larger region adversely impacted by climate change.

Coordinating Entities
▪ Alameda County Office of Emergency Services (OES) is responsible for coordinating with County departments, municipalities, key stakeholders, and special districts to mitigate against, prepare for, respond to, and recover from all disasters. OES designs and conducts simulated disaster response exercises, evaluates emergency staff training, creates evacuation strategies, and maintains the County Emergency Operations Center (EOC) in a state of readiness. OES also educates the community on preparedness, facilitates stakeholder collaboration, and seeks additional funding through grants and strategic partnerships. OES manages the Alameda County Government's response to and recovery from a disaster and provides support to any city, town, or special district responding to and recovering from a disaster. These services are relevant for all climate related hazards.
▪ The Alameda County Public Health Department is responsible for an array of programs and services designed to protect the health and safety of County residents. Its programs and services include assessments of the health status of residents, disease prevention and control, community mobilization and outreach, policy development, education, and assurance of access to quality medical and health care services. Seated within its Division of Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, it has responsibilities for Public Health Emergency Preparedness, which includes responsibility for coordinating public health emergencies, including “extreme heat waves that can increase the risk of heat-related illnesses. ▪ Alameda County Flood Control District provides flood protection for Western Alameda County residents and businesses. The district plans, designs, constructs, and maintains flood control systems such as natural creeks, channels, levees, pump stations, dams, and reservoirs. The district also cares for the natural environment through public outreach and enforcement of pollution control regulations governing its waterways.
▪ Hayward Department of Public Works is the staff lead for many of the City’s mitigation strategies including the green infrastructure plan development, climate action and adaptation Adaptive Capacity

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 3
plan, and energy assurance plan. Hayward Department of Public Works also owns and maintains 175 miles of the City’s drainage system.
▪ Hayward Area Shoreline Planning Agency (HASPA) is a joint powers authority responsible for coordinating agency planning activities, implementing policies for the improvement of the Hayward Shoreline, and addressing impacts related to Sea Level Rise. The organization prepared the Hayward Regional Shoreline Adaptation Master Plan, which includes multi-benefit strategies to address sea level rise.
▪ San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) is the water provider for Hayward and operates within the greater San Francisco Bay Area Region providing water delivery and infrastructure services. SFPUC is accounted for within the San Francisco Local Hazard Mitigation Plan regarding hazard planning around service provision. ▪ Hayward Fire Department (HFD) is responsible for Hayward’s fire mitigation both in fuel reduction and firefighting during the event of a fire. With none of the city as a VHFHSZ, there have been few instances of need for mutual aid in Hayward specific disasters. ▪ The Diablo Firesafe Council operates in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties and serves as a catalyst for bringing together people, agencies, and the means to substantially reduce the impact of wildland fire on communities. The organization prepared the Alameda County Community Wildfire Protection Plan, which includes wildfire mitigation strategies that can support the City.
▪ Bay Climate Adaptation Network (BayCAN): BayCAN is a collaborative network of local government staff and partnering organizations working to help the Bay Area respond effectively and equitably to the impacts of climate change on human health, infrastructure, and natural systems. Hayward is involved within this network through the Hayward Area Shoreline Planning Agency.
▪ Additional Coordination: Hayward is also part of the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) which operates as a planning agency and service provider for local governments in the San Francisco Bay Area region. Part of the ABAG coordination involves participations in the regional lifelines council
The coordinating entities contribute towards the following planning documents and agreements found in Table 4 below:

Table 4 Coordinated Planning Documents & Agreements
Document
Most Recent
Revision
Climate Change
Impact
Update
Cycle Responsible Entity
Alameda County Safety
Element Update
2013 Multi-hazard 5-8 years Alameda County Planning
Department
City of Hayward Local Hazard
Mitigation Plan
2016 (update
underway)
Multi-hazard 5 Years Hayward Planning Department
Alameda County Local Hazard
Mitigation Plan (2016-2021)
2016 (update
underway)
Multi-hazard 5 Years Alameda County
Alameda County Fire Department
Alameda County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District
Alameda County Community
Wildfire Protection Plan
2015 Wildfire N/A Diablo Firesafe Council
City of Hayward Emergency
Operations Plan (EOP) aka
“Disaster Plan”
2021 Multi-hazard Reviewed
Annually
Hayward Emergency Management
Director
City of Hayward
Hazards Element Update

4 Alameda County Emergency
Operations Plan (EOP)
2012 Multi-hazard N/A Alameda County Sheriff’s Office of Homeland Security and Emergency
Services
Annex to 2010 ABAG Local
Hazard Mitigation Plan
2010 Multi-hazard 5 Years BCDC
Preliminary Study of the Effect
of Sea Level Rise on the
Resources of the Hayward
Shoreline
2010 SLR N/A HASPA
Hayward Shoreline Resilience
Study
2015 SLR N/A BCDC
Hayward Shoreline Adaptation
Master Plan
2021 SLR N/A HASPA
Alameda County Capital
Improvement Program
2021 Multi-hazard 5 years County Administrator
SFPUC Urban Water
Management Plan
2021 Drought 5 years SFPUC
Hayward Adopted Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP)
2021 Multi-hazard Reviewed
Annually
Hayward Public Works
Hillside Design and
Urban/Wildlife Interface
Guidelines
1993 Wildfire N/A Hayward Planning Department
City of Hayward Climate Action
Plan
2014 (update
underway)
Multi-hazard N/A Hayward Public Works Department –
Environmental Services Division
California State Hazard
Mitigation Plan (SHMP)
2018 Multi-hazard N/A Cal OES
Alameda County Water
Shortage Contingency Plan
2021 Drought N/A Alameda County Water District
Hayward General Plan 2014 Multi-hazard N/A Hayward Planning Department Temperature Specific Coordination/Planning
The Alameda County Public Health Department is responsible preparing and responding to extreme heat events. The Division of Communicable Disease Control and Prevention provides County residents guidance on how to prepare for and deal with heat emergencies.

Wildfire Specific Coordination/Planning
The Alameda County Community Wildfire Protection Plan includes Hayward in its planning efforts and details the regional risks and how the collaborative efforts of fire departments will mitigate wildfire risk. Hayward lists participation in the ABAG regional Lifelines Council as another way to coordinate wildfire mitigation support.

Variable Precipitation and Drought Specific Coordination/Planning The City coordinates with SFPUC for drought contingency planning through the San Francisco LHMP which details the water redundancies currently in place for anticipated increases in droughts.

Hayward coordinates with the county as well as through the Alameda County Water Shortage Contingency Plan.

Adaptive Capacity

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 5
The Alameda County Flood Control District is the lead coordinating entity for the City for planning and managing regional stormwater infrastructure and systems. The District prepares Master Plans, implements environmental restoration projects. It also inspects and maintains more than 500 miles of conduit, channels, and natural creeks in western Alameda County. It clears excess vegetation, sediment, and debris from watercourses. It also maintains 22 pump stations and 3,700 County tide gates. Notably, the Bockman and Estudillo Canals along with 12 separate creeks run through various parts of the City. The 2014 Hayward Climate Action Plan calls for water conservation and recycling as a part of a larger regional effort along with green stormwater infrastructure and rainwater harvesting.30
Sea Level Rise Specific Coordination/Planning
The City is a member of the Hayward Area Shoreline Planning Agency (HASPA),Bay Adapt Working Group and Bay Area Climate Adaptation Network.. Through these efforts, it is engaged in regional SLR adaptation planning and coordination. The HASPA Shoreline Adaptation Master Plan developed various multi-benefit strategies for the shoreline, its existing infrastructure and surrounding natural habitat related to SLR planning. HASPA is currently working towards implementation of projects identified within the Master Plan.

5.2 City-Specific Capacity
Increased Temperature Preparedness and Response
Cities in Alameda County generally rely on the County Public Health Department to direct responses to public health emergencies, including excessive heat emergencies. As such, it does not currently have City-specific plans, protocols, or trainings to address or respond to increased temperature and increased risk of extreme heat beyond those coordinated by the County. The Alameda County OES issues Heat Alerts through AC Alert, the County’s emergency alerts system with accessibility measures taken to address linguistically isolated individuals. Hayward’s Climate Action Plan includes multiple strategies to reduce urban heat island effect and improve the urban forest through establishing a healthy and resilient tree canopy throughout the City.

Wildfire Preparedness and Response
Increasing wildfire risk for the region has yielded several city-specific preparedness efforts. The Hillside design plan guides most changes in wildfire management but has not been updated since 1993. The Hayward LHMP lists several actions for wildfire preparedness including emergency response trainings, community education, power redundancies, creation of a disaster recovery plan, equipment acquisition, and assurance of defensible space.

Extreme Precipitation and Drought Preparedness and Response The City’s LHMP details a drought related recycled water project as a high priority measure for Hayward. Alameda County also has water shortage preparedness measures, but these are not necessarily Hayward-specific. Most drought preparedness is organized from a broader regional level. The City primarily relies upon SFPUC for drought contingency planning in compliance with State requirements.

There are several mitigation strategies in the City’s LHMP that relate to extreme precipitation mostly concerning general community education` and community emergency response trainings.

City of Hayward
Hazards Element Update

6 There are few inland flooding or extreme precipitation-specific actions for the City. There is a recycled water measure through the LHMP concerning Drought adaptation.

Sea Level Rise Preparedness and Response
The City, as a member of HAPSA, has conducted two studies about sea level rise impacts and shoreline resiliency to determine the best direction and actions for SLR adaptation planning.

Building upon these studies, HASPA developed the Hayward Regional Shoreline Adaptation Master Plan which includes various multi-benefit strategies for the shoreline, its existing infrastructure and surrounding natural habitat to adapt to SLR. The Master Plan has specific projects to protect the Hayward Water Pollution Control Facility, industrial areas and shoreline infrastructure for rising sea levels. This project was identified in the Hayward LHMP alongside the expansion of HASPA . The City is currently coordinating with other agencies to expand HASPA’s membership as a way to support the implementation of the Master Plan and increase the region’s ability to adapt to SLR.

Vulnerability Analysis

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 7
6 Vulnerability Analysis
Vulnerability is based on the potential for impacts combine with the capacity to adapt. This section provides a qualitative analysis of vulnerability for identified assets in Hayward. The discussion will be used to inform policy and program selection to prioritize policies and programs that provide the greatest resiliency benefits.

6.1 People
Hayward’s population is vulnerable to potential health and safety risks mainly from the direct impacts of extreme heat. Risks derived from wildfire, extreme precipitation and Bayshore flooding are possible, but less likely in the near term.

The growing intensity and occurrence of extreme heat events is the main climate impact of concern for the Hayward population through the end of the century with impacts already being felt. The City has limited cooling centers to address the need extreme heat poses. Seniors, young children, individuals with chronic health conditions are particularly vulnerable to heat-related illnesses.

Increasing average temperatures may place an increasing financial strain on people in Hayward.

Weatherization and air conditioning investments can be expected to become more desirable as temperatures increase in the coming decades. This may also lead to increased energy costs, which may strain the budgets of seniors on a fixed income, those who are housing burdened, and those who are generally financially disadvantaged. An additional contributing factor to vulnerability is the slightly lower-than-average tree canopy cover within the City which can provide natural cooling for the community along active transportation corridors and throughout the urbanized parts of the city outside of PG&E managed fuel reduction efforts in the Hayward hills.16 Presently, wildfire risk (per CAL FIRE hazard maps) to the City is generally limited to areas associated with the East Bay Regional Parks (adjacent to the eastern City limits. Climate change is anticipated to increase the risk of wildfire in eastern Hayward. If wildfires continue to become more intense, the potential area at-risk could shift westward into the City limits. The Hayward Fire Department has primary responsibility for wildfire mitigation within the City limits. There is a county-level community wildfire protection plan last updated in 2015 but no city-level community protection plan.

Opportunities exist to include more robust community-specific planning in future community wildfire protection updates including actions for adapting the community to increased wildfire smoke. The City could develop its own community wildfire protection plan (or be an active participant in an updated County effort. Despite not having a VHFHSZ within the City, the WUI with fire zones across the eastern border of the city is very prevalent and includes residential neighborhoods. Wildfire-caused smoke is also likely to become an increasingly prevalent hazard.

With recent significant increase in acres of land exposed to wildfire per the Hayward LHMP, plans like the Hillside Design and Urban/Wildlife Interface Guidelines last updated in 1993 could use an update. It may also be beneficial to accelerate additional types of wildfire prevention programming for residential neighborhoods to the East, building on existing pilot programs.

Smoke-related air quality emergencies are secondary impacts of increases in regional wildfire. This type of impact would be handled by the County Department of Public Health and Emergency Alerts issued by County OES. At-risk groups with chronic health conditions, young children, and seniors City of Hayward
Hazards Element Update

8 may be especially vulnerable to these events. Those who are financially disadvantaged may not be able to protect their living spaces to smoke. There is minimal existing infrastructure for mitigating smoke impacts for vulnerable populations and adapting response efforts to minimize negative health outcomes.

Sea Level Rise and Bayshore Flooding are likely to affect the most western areas of Hayward by the year 2050. Planning efforts surrounding theses hazards need to account for financial burdens and the displacement of people. Homeowners in the Glen Eden, Eden Shores and communities neighboring the Hayward Regional Shoreline are at increased risk for financial burdens associated with the damage or loss of property. Budgets will be even more strained for seniors on fixed incomes, homeowners who are housing burdened and homeowners who are financially disadvantaged. These risks and impacts also apply to business owners in this hazard zone Cascading impacts from climate hazards for the populations of Hayward occur mainly in the form of power outages, compromised public transit, and reduced air quality. All of these impacts can further the isolation of vulnerable populations and/or exacerbate existing vulnerabilities. The loss of critical services in association with a climate hazard presents a cascading risk factor that may amplify the vulnerability of people to identified climate hazards. The power grid is of particular importance during heat emergencies as people will depend on electric powered air-conditioning or fans to cool themselves. The power grid will be strained from increasing demand during extreme heat events, which would increase the likelihood of outages. It may also increase the risk that a failure triggers a wildfire. Water supply reliability and communications are also critical, particularly for wildfire response.

6.2 Community Structures & Infrastructure
Damaged infrastructure can lead to a loss of electricity, sanitation services, food, clean water, health care, communication services and transportation which poses health risks for the Hayward community. To help reduce adverse effects on vulnerable populations and increase Hayward’s ability to adapt, adaptation strategies and policies must be identified to ensure a high standard of condition and performance for all infrastructure systems. Adaptation strategies and policies should focus on overall disaster mitigation and preparedness. Hayward community structures and infrastructure are exposed to damages associated with extreme precipitation, sea level rise and increased temperatures. Wildfires are less likely to directly impact structures and infrastructure.

The greatest potential risk to community structures and infrastructure in Hayward is from increased precipitation. The numerous creeks that run through Hayward present inland flooding vulnerabilities during extreme precipitation events potentially flooding structures and roadways limiting access for the community. Damages from storms via falling debris such as downed trees or erosion, washouts, sinkholes, and landslides can all adversely impact community structures and infrastructures. The Flood Control District plays a key role in the city’s adaptive measures.

Community structures and infrastructure are set up well to handle increased precipitation.

Inundation through Bayshore flooding poses few direct threats to community structures and infrastructure. Like precipitation hazards, SLR limits mobility and accessibility of the community.

Most impacts from SLR and Bayshore flooding occur when community structures become strained as a secondary impact due to displacement of people associated with this hazard. Community plans and Resilience hubs were not identified to respond to this anticipated need in increased capacity.

An added secondary impact related to infrastructure would be storm drain damage from SLR. As the Vulnerability Analysis

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 9
sea levels rise, storm drain’s capacity is reduced as the drains become access points for Bay water to inundate roads and the community.

Community structures and infrastructure are exposed to increased temperatures more generally with extreme heat impacting the community in secondary ways. Power outages may inhibit the ability for community structures and infrastructure to remain operational. The ACDPH has an extreme heat plan to incorporate extreme heat planning for community structures. The Hayward CAP includes measures to improve the cooling infrastructure for the City through tree canopy development.

Compromised transportation and service provision as a cascading risk factor of these hazards can have adverse impacts afflicting vulnerable populations of low income, seniors, individuals experiencing homelessness, non-English speakers, and young children. All these populations have a higher likelihood for infrastructure and community structure dependencies that can be limited by the hazards associated with climate change. Over time there will be service enhancement opportunities through community structures and infrastructure retrofits and weatherization of buildings which may place financial strain on the City. The reliability of community structures for any hazard plan involving evacuation as well as adequate resilience considerations of public infrastructure for mobility and functionality reliability are the most susceptible aspects of community structures and infrastructure to climate change.

6.3 Parks & Open Space
Variations in precipitation can stress vegetation, increased temperatures and drought may lead to vegetation drying out due to increased evapotranspiration, and soil moisture reductions, and prolonged drought may increase vegetation mortality. Increased intensity of storms can result in increased risk of temporary flooding, soil saturation, and slope instability. Parks and open space also serve a critical role in the City’s adaptive capacity to climate change.

Primary impacts of increased temperature leading to drought and extreme heat can cause dead/heat stressed vegetation within Hayward’s parks and open spaces. These hazards may create a secondary impact of greater needs around maintenance and irrigation to ensure the useability of the parks. This process would create an increased investment for irrigation demands, and maintenance.

Bayshore flooding will inundate Gordon E. Oliver, Palma Ceia, Southgate, Mount Eden and Greenwood Park by 2050. Hayward coordinates with the Hayward Area Shoreline Planning Agency (HASPA), Bay Adapt Working Group and Bay Area Climate Adaptation Network to coordinate SLR planning efforts. Implementation of the Hayward Shoreline Adaptation Master Plan will lead to the adaptation and protection of parks, open space and recreational resources from rising sea levels.

Increased precipitation can also lead to damages of community parks .,with higher likelihood of erosion, inland flooding, and general vegetative stress as well as downed trees. This hazard further compounds secondary impacts of access reductions for the Hayward community.

The EBRPD and HARD-managed parks and open spaces are not located within wildfire VHFHSZs. As discussed earlier, the KBDI shows how wildfire conducive conditions increase through the end of the century by compounding with drought and increased temperatures potentially changing the classification of the City’s parks and open spaces to VHFHSZs which would require more specific planning for the City. Currently the Alameda County Community Wildfire Protection Plan is what Hayward follows for wildfire mitigation guidance along with City-specific coordination through the Hayward Fire Department. Existing activities managed by the EBRPD include the fuel reduction City of Hayward
Hazards Element Update

10 efforts conducted seasonally to mitigate wildfires.31 Efforts through HARD include acknowledgement of the role parks and open space play in mitigating the effects of extreme heat.32 The projected hazards to affect Hayward parks and open spaces create cascading risk factors around general community health declines especially for already vulnerable populations who may depend on the parks as a buffering mechanism.33 Secondary impacts of greater needed investments caused by inundation from Bayshore flooding, dead vegetation from increased temperatures, or general damages from intense precipitation creates a clear need for specific adaptive planning measures around the Hayward parks and open spaces which exist only in the broad sense with the City’s LHMP.

6.4 Services
The services within Hayward including wastewater, waste, power, water and emergency services are all limited by the impacts of climate change with respect to their operational capacity in the face of hazards. Most service complications arise due to water and power unreliability from intense precipitation, wildfire, and flooding. Emergency service personnel can also suffer from extreme heat-related illnesses, such as heat stress and dehydration, both of which can be fatal.

Wildfire conditions of the greater region can also impact service reliability for Hayward. While wildfires will have minimal direct impacts for the City, generally unhealthy air quality associated with regional wildfires can create secondary impacts of increased need for both emergency services as well as power and water to cope with this hazard. Additionally, regional wildfires can complicate emergency service distribution through power safety shutoffs limiting communications and creating further vulnerabilities for isolated populations. The City relies on HFD, the Alameda Community Wildfire Protection Plan and the LHMP for service measures relating to wildfire. The gap in service is smoke and air quality related.

Increased precipitation leading to greater inland flooding, storm debris and damage of power lines or stormwater drainage capacity are the main impacts of concern. Secondary impacts include further concerns of water and power reliability during intense storms as well as isolation of populations within hazard affected areas who may not be able to access emergency services due to the broad implications of increased precipitation. has many of the same reliability vulnerabilities as increased temperature except associated with storm debris, flooding and more closely aligned with power reliability and emergency service accessibility.

Stormwater management along with SLR and Bayshore flooding may be a point of vulnerability for the city without continued measures put in place to increase resilience and capacity of this service.

SLR and Bayshore flooding are tied to primary impacts around reduced power and water service because of damages to power and water lines from flooding. SLR secondary impacts are like other hazards with population isolation because of communication power dependencies are general accessibility reductions from flooding. Additionally, Fire Station #4 and the Water Pollution Control Facility are both located within the Bayshore flooding hazard zone. Planning for the protection of the Water Pollution Control Facility is explicitly identified in the Hayward Regional Shoreline Adaptation Master Plan while planning efforts for other facility have been more general.

Cascading risk factors for Hayward services encompasses mainly the intersectionality between hazards and service provision. All hazards outlined within the City present an obstacle in reliability of emergency services as we well as power and water. These risks cascade into the sensitivities of vulnerable populations by either isolating them or having such a large service strain that the community is inadequately prepared for the needed capacity in the face of climate change.

References

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 11
7 References

1 The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). 2022. The Effects of Climate Change.

Available: <https://climate.nasa.gov/effects/>. Accessed February 2, 2022. 2 IPCC, The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Sixth Assessment Report. 2021. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/#FullReport
3 Hayward History. https://www.hayward-ca.gov/discover/hayward-history 4 Hayward General Plan 2040. https://www.hayward2040generalplan.com/ 5 Hayward LHMP, 2016. https://www.hayward-
ca.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/2016%20City%20of%20Hayward%20Local%20Hazard%20Mitigation% 20Plan.pdf
6 The California Healthy Places Index (HPI). Hayward City Indicators. https://map.healthyplacesindex.org/
7 California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES). 2020. California Adaptation Planning Guide. https://www.caloes.ca.gov/HazardMitigationSite/Documents/CA-Adaptation-Planning- Guide-FINAL-June-2020-Accessible.pdf
8 Seneviratne, S.I., Et.al. 2012. “Changes in climate extremes and their impacts on the natural physical environment,” In: Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA, pp. 109-230. 2012 https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/SREX-Chap3_FINAL-1.pdf 9 Collins M., M. Sutherland, L. Bouwer, S.-M. Cheong, T. Frölicher, H. Jacot Des Combes, M. Koll Roxy, I. Losada, K. McInnes, B. Ratter, E. Rivera-Arriaga, R.D. Susanto, D. Swingedouw, and L. Tibig, 2019: Extremes, Abrupt Changes and Managing Risk. In: IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, M.

Tignor, E. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Nicolai, A. Okem, J. Petzold, B. Rama, N.M.

Weyer (eds.)]. In press.
10 Cal-Adapt. Cal-Adapt Local Climate Change Snapshot for Hayward. https://cal- adapt.org/tools/local-climate-change-snapshot
11 University of Hawaii at Manoa. "Larger variability in sea level expected as Earth warms." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 20 August 2020.
<www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/08/200820112850.htm>. 12 San Francisco Bay Area Region Report, California Fourth Climate Change Assessment. 2019. https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2019-11/Reg_Report-SUM-CCCA4-2018- 005_SanFranciscoBayArea_ADA.pdf
13 Adapting to Rising Tides. Bay Shoreline Flood Explorer. 2021. https://explorer.adaptingtorisingtides.org/explorer

City of Hayward
Hazards Element Update

12 14 Ocean Protection Council (OPC). State of California Sea-Level Rise Guidance. 2018. https://opc.ca.gov/webmaster/ftp/pdf/agenda_items/20180314/Item3_Exhibit- A_OPC_SLR_Guidance-rd3.pdf
15 USGCRP, 2018: Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume II: [Reidmiller, D.R., C.W. Avery, D.R. Easterling, K.E. Kunkel, K.L.M. Lewis, T.K.

Maycock, and B.C. Stewart (eds.)]. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA, 1515 pp. doi: 10.7930/NCA4.2018.
16 Healthy Places Index, The California Healthy Places Index: Hayward. https://map.healthyplacesindex.org/
17 USGS. Hazard Exposure and Reporting Analytics – Impact of Sea Level Rise on Groundwater Hazards. 2021. https://www.usgs.gov/apps/hera/groundwaterTool.php. Accessed March 23, 2022 18 California Department of Public Health (CDPH). 2020. Climate Change and Health Vulnerability Indicators for California. https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/OHE/Pages/CC-Health-Vulnerability- Indicators.aspx
19 United States Census Bureau. 2019. Quick Facts Hayward city, California. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/sanleandrocitycalifornia/INC110219 20 EveryOne Counts. Hayward 2022 Point in Time Count Unsheltered & Sheltered Report, 2022. https://everyonehome.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Hayward-PIT-2022-Infographic- Report.pdf
21 California Department of Public Health (CDPH). 2020. Climate Change and Health Vulnerability Indicators for California: Race/Ethnicity Narrative.
https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/OHE/CDPH%20Document%20Library/CHVIs/Race_Ethnicity_79 4_Narrative.pdf
22 US Census, Hayward California Quick Facts. 2021
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/haywardcitycalifornia 23 Siegel, Paul., Martin, Elizabeth., and Bruno, Rosalind. U.S. Census Bureau, Language Use and Linguistic Isolation: Historical Data and Methodological Issues. (2001) https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2007/adrm/ssm2007-02.pdf 24 County of Alameda. The 2020 Alameda County Regional Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI). https://www.acgov.org/cda/hcd/documents/FinalAI_Combined_1-10-19.pdf 25 Global Health Action. 2013. Vulnerability to extreme heat and climate change: is ethnicity a factor? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3728476/ 26 Centers for Disease Control (CDC). 2017. Heat and Older Adults. <https://www.cdc.gov/disasters/extremeheat/older-adults-heat.html> 27 California DWR. Wildfire and Impacts to Water. 2021. https://water.ca.gov/News/Blog/2021/November/Wildfire-and-Impacts-to-Water 28 Dale, Larry, Michael Carnall, Gary Fitts, Sarah Lewis McDonald, and Max Wei. (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory). 2018. Assessing the Impact of Wildfires on the California Electricity Grid.

References

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment 13

California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment, California Energy Commission. Publication Number:

CCCA4-CEC-2018-002.
29 California Coastal Commission. Critical Infrastructure at Risk: Sea Level Rise Planning Guidance for California’s Coastal Zone. 2021.
https://documents.coastal.ca.gov/assets/slr/guidance/SLR%20Guidance_Critical%20Infrastructure_

11.3.2021_FINAL_FullPDF.pdf
30 City of Hayward CAP. Climate action Plan-Policies and Programs.2014. https://www.hayward- ca.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Climate%20Action%20Plan%20- %20Policies%20and%20Implementation%20Programs.pdf
31 East Bay Regional Park District. Climate Actions in Our Parks. 2022. https://www.ebparks.org/natural-resources/climate-adaptation/actions 32 Hayward Area Recreation and Park District. Hayward Area Recreation and Park District Park and Recreation Master Plan. 2019. https://haywardrec.org/DocumentCenter/View/6911/Hayward-Area- Recreation-and-Park-District_Park-Master-Plan?bidId=
33 Park, G., & Evans, G. W. (2019). Environment and health. In C. D. Llewellyn, S. Ayers, C. McManus, S. Newman, K. J. Petrie, T. A. Revenson, & J. Weinman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psychology, health and medicine (pp. 32–36). Cambridge University Press.

Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

Technical Memorandum

INTRODUCTION
This memorandum presents the evacuation analysis methodology, results, and considerations for the City of Hayward (City) as part of their ongoing General Plan Safety Element update. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. (Kittelson) modeled five (5) evacuation scenarios for the City to estimate roadway capacity constraints during evacuations. Specifically, the analysis helps identify locations with a greater potential for evacuation-related traffic congestion. This evaluation is consistent with requirements outlined in Assembly Bill (AB) 7471 and Senate Bill (SB) 992. These laws require agencies to evaluate the resiliency of their transportation system, the capacity of evacuation routes, and identify key routes for community areas with only one access point. The legislative requirements are briefly summarized in the following subsection.

The document is organized into four sections:

1. Roadway network baseline conditions;

2. Evacuation scenarios methodology and evaluation;

3. Evacuation scenario findings, including potential evacuation congestion; and,

4. Evacuation planning considerations and recommendations.

Legislative Requirements
Recent California legislation, including AB 747 and SB 99, has been passed requiring all local agencies to review accessibility and evacuation routes when specific elements within the General Plan or other emergency planning documents are completed or updated by a local agency.  Senate Bill 99 requires review and update of Safety Element to include information to identify residential developments in hazard areas that do not have at least two emergency evacuation routes. This is intended to assist the city in identifying opportunities to improve the connectivity and resiliency of the transportation system.
 Assembly Bill 747 requires that the Safety Element be reviewed and updated to identify evacuation routes and their capacity, safety, and viability under a range of emergency scenarios.

This is a requirement for all Safety Elements or updates to Hazard Mitigation Plans completed after January 2022.

1 https://openstates.org/ca/bills/20192020/AB747/
2 https://openstates.org/ca/bills/20192020/SB99/
155 Grand Avenue, Suite 505
Oakland, CA 94612
P 510.839.1742
October 10, 2022 Project# 26593
To: Leigha Schmidt
City of Hayward
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
From: Sravya Kamalapuram, Anusha Musunuru, PhD; Matt Braughton, RSP CC: Eric Vaughan; Darcy Kremin; Rincon Consultants, Inc.

RE: City of Hayward Evacuation Analysis – Methodology, Results, and Considerations October 10, 2022 Page 2
City of Hayward Evacuation Analysis Methodology, Results, and Considerations Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

ROADWAY NETWORK & BASELINE CONDITIONS
The City of Hayward is in the San Francisco East Bay Area, bounded by San Lorenzo to the north and Union City to the south. Communities and businesses are oriented along interstates and several state highway facilities. Evacuation trips from Hayward are most likely to use the least congested route to Interstate-880 (I- 880), or one of the other state routes (SR) – SR 238 and SR 92. There are also several secondary routes that run parallel to the interstate and state highways that are also likely to be used for evacuation purposes, depending on the evacuation area, including: Hesperian Boulevard, Jackson Street, Industrial Parkway, Harder Road, Winton Avenue, A Street, and Santa Clara Street.

The evacuation analysis utilizes the Alameda County Transportation Commission (CTC) Countywide Travel Demand Model (model). The current model was completed in 2019 and includes Plan Bay Area 2040 land use assumptions. The model represents all land uses in the County grouped into traffic analysis zones (TAZs) and includes a representative roadway network (generally all streets except for very local residential streets). Each road segment is coded with functional classification, number of lanes, uncongested speed, and an estimate of the typical hourly capacity. The model estimates vehicle trips generated by each land use, distributes the trips to a variety of likely destinations, and assigns each origin-destination pair to the best route. The model also assesses congestion and iteratively diverts traffic to alternative routes until congestion is balanced between all available routes. For this analysis, Kittelson considered the land use associated with the future 2040 year plus the Housing Element scenario (this scenario includes land use assumptions from Plan Bay Area 2040, the Hayward General Plan, and the addition of new housing and employment as part of the City’s current (2022) Housing Element update.

Each evacuation scenario analysis compares results to the baseline 2040 year plus Housing Element weekday PM peak hour conditions to identify locations where evacuation traffic might be expected to result in substantial congestion. The baseline conditions model estimates indicate that congestion in 2040 will be present. Specifically, roadways where volumes are at/exceed capacity include:
• Northbound I-880 (towards Oakland)
• Southbound I-880 (towards San Jose)
• Northbound I-238 (towards San Leandro)
• Southbound I-238 (towards Fremont)
• Eastbound SR - 92
• Eastbound W Jackson St (between I-880 and I-238)
• Northbound Hesparian Blvd (between W Winton Avenue and W A St) • Northbound Whitman St (between Tennyson Rd and Alves St)

This congestion reflects regular commute congestion in the Bay Area. The secondary roadways noted above serve as parallel routes to freeways as well as east-west connections in the City. These congested roadways represent the usual commute traffic patterns and congestion, specifically in the City of Hayward and generally in the Bay Area. Figure 1 shows the conditions for the City of Hayward where the highest baseline 2040 PM peak hour volume to capacity conditions are estimated.

AA
AA
AA
A
AAAA
A
AA
AA
AAAA
A
AAA
AAA
AA
AAA
AAAA
A
A

AAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAA

AAAAAAAAA
AAA
AA
AA
AAAA
A
AA
AA
AAA
AAA
AAA
A

AAAAAAAAAAAAA
A
AA
AAA
A
AAA
AAA

AAAA AAA
AAA
A
AAA
AA
A

AAAAA AAAAA
AA
AA
A A
A
AA
A
AAA
AAAA
A
AAA
A
A
AA
AA
A
AA
A
AAA
AA
AA
AAA
AAAAA
AA
A
AAAA
AAAA
AA
A
AAAAA
AAA
AAAA
AA
AAAA
AAAAAA
AA
AAA

AAAA AAA

AAA AAAA
AA
AAA
AAA
AAA
A
AAA
AAA
AA
AAA
AAAA
AAAA
AAAA
AAA
AA

AAAA AAAAA
AAAAA
A
AAA
AA
AA
AA

AAAAAAA
AAAA
AAA
AAA
AA
A

AAAAAAA

AAAAAA A
AAAA
A

AAAAAAA
AAAA
A
AA

AAAA AAA
A
AAAA A
A AAA
AAAAA
AA
AAA
AAA
A
AAAA
A
AAAAAA
AAA
AA
A
AA
AAAA

AAAAAAA
AAA
AAA
AAA A
AAAAA
AA
AA
AAA
AAA

AAAAAAA
AAAA
AAA
AAA
A
AAAAAA

AAAAAAAA
A
AAAA
AA
AA
AA
A
AAA
AAAA
AAAA
A
AAAAAA
A AA
AAA
A
AA
AAA
AA AAA
A
AA
AA
AAAA
AAA
AA
AAA
AA
AAA
AAAAA
A
AAA
AA
AA A

AA AAAA
AA

A A AAAAA
A
A
A A
AA
A
A
AA
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
AAA
A
A

AAAAAAA
AAAA

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAA
AAAA
AA
AAA
AAA
A

AAAA AAAAAAAAAAAA
AAA
AAAAAA
AAAA
AAA
AAAA
AAA
AA

AA AA AA
AA
AAAA
AAAA

AAAA AA
A
AAAA
AA
AAAA
AAAA
A
AAAA
AAAA
A
AAA
AAAA
AA
AAAA
AA
AAA
AAAA
AAAA
A
AA
AAA

A AAAAAAAAAA
AAA
AA
AAA
AA

AAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAA
A AAAA
A
AA
AAA
AAA
AAA
AAAA
AA
AAA
AA
A
AAAAA
AAAAAA
A
A
AA

AAAAAAAAAAAAA
AA

AAA AAAAAAAAAAA AAA
AAAAAA
AAAA

AAAAAAAAAAA
AAAA
AA
AAAAA

AAA AAAAAAA

AAAAAAAAAA
A
AA
A
AAAAA
AA
AAA
A
A
AAAA
AA

AAAA AAA

AAAA AAA AA
A
AAA

AAAAAAAAAA
A
A
AAAAAA
AAAA

AA AA AA
AAAA
AA
AA
A
AA
A
A
AAA
AAAA

AAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAA AA
A
A
AAA
AAA
AAA
A
AA
AA
A
A
A
A
A AA
A
A
AAAA
A
AA
A
AAAA
M
a
n
o
r
D
r
Peralta Bl
Fremont Bl
W Jackson St
Alvarado Bl
S
u
n
o
l
R
i
d
g
e
T r
D
e
e
p
C
r
e
e
k
R
d
V
a l l e
y
T
r a
i l s
D
r
Beard Rd
W
L
a
s
P
o s i t a s
B
l
Bernal Av
Hopyard Rd
Hesperian Bl
P
a
s
e
o
P
a
d
r
e
P
w
M
o
w
r y
A
v
F
o
o
t
h
i l l
R
d
C
h
a
b
o
t
D
r
W
a
l n
u
t
A
v
V
a
l
l
e
y
A
v
S t o n e r i d g e D r
C
h
e
r
r
y
L
n
Third St
T
h
o
r
n
t o
n
A
v
Ardo St
R
i d
g
e
w
o
o
d
D
r
W A S t
F
a
l
c
o
n
D
r
Second St
T
a
m
a
y
o
S
t
D
a
r
w
i n
D
r
Mission Bl
M u i r w
o
o
d
D
r
Decoto Rd
N
ic
o
l e
t
A v
C
a n a
R
d
Alvarado Niles Rd
G
i b
r a
l t a
r
D
r
Alder Av
Lowry Rd
M
o
n
t e
c
i
t o D
r
A St
F
o
o
t
h
i
l l
B
l
Niles Bl
Jackson St
P
a
l o
m
a
r
e
s
R
d
N
i l e
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
R d
A
r d
e
n
w
o
o
d
B
l
C
o w i n g
R d
M
i s
s
i o
n
R
d
F
a
i r
v
i e
w
A
v
P
a
s
e
o
S
a
n t a C
r u
z
J
e
e
p
T
r
Willow Rd
I n d u s t r i a l P w W
L
i n d a
D
r
L
a
u r
e
l
C
r e
e
k
D r
V o
g
e
l
L
n
∙þ
92 ∙þ
238
∙þ
84 §¨¦
880
§¨¦
680
§¨¦
580
H:\26\26593 - Hayward Housing Element EIR\gis\KAI 26593 Hayward Housing Element EIR.aprx Date: 9/22/2022 Baseline Conditions
Hayward, California
Figure 1
0 1 2Miles
[
AAAOver Capacity (V/C > 1)
AAACongested (V/C 0.9 to 1)
Uncongested (V/C under 0.9)
Hayward Boundary
October 10, 2022 Page 4
City of Hayward Evacuation Analysis Methodology, Results, and Considerations Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

EVACUATION EVALUATION
Kittelson modeled evacuations for five emergency scenarios selected based on City staff and stakeholder input. These stakeholders included the City’s emergency services specialist, Alameda County Fire Department, and Alameda County Sheriff’s Office. Through these discussions and the most likely emergency scenarios expected to impact the City, the scenarios identified for evacuation analysis include:
 Wildfire
 Tsunami
 New Calaveras Dam Failure
 Downtown Pipeline Failure
 Eden/Southgate Pipeline Failure
Each of these scenarios and their analysis assumptions are described in the Scenario Selection Technical Memorandum (July 2022). The evaluation steps for the evacuation analysis are described below.

Step 1: Identifying Travel Patterns
Time Period: Kittelson modeled transportation activity for one time period – PM peak hour for all evacuation scenarios. All evacuation traffic was assumed to occur during this period involving the specified area within the city. For the PM peak hour, Kittelson reviewed the model’s TAZs and assigned each TAZ a combination of Baseline travel and Evacuation travel (25% and 75%, respectively), based on its presence in the evacuation area.

Travel Type: Baseline travel represents normal travel patterns during the PM peak hour as included in the travel model. Evacuation travel represents estimated evacuation trips from each evacuating TAZ.

Evacuation travel replaces the normal travel patterns (discussed in Step 2 below). Kittelson modeled travel for each evacuating TAZ shifting to a mix of baseline and evacuation travel (i.e., 25% and 75%, respectively).

Roadway Capacity: Kittelson modeled trip patterns using the default capacities for each roadway within and outside the city. The scenarios represent conditions without implementation of any evacuation strategies, such as contraflow lanes, which could increase roadway capacity in one direction versus the other.

Step 2: Estimating Evacuation Trips and Routing
Number of Evacuation Trips: In general, modeled trips are a function of several patterns, including the land uses in an area, the socio-economic characteristics of the population in the area (e.g., auto ownership, income, and household size), and the type and extent of transportation facilities in an area. Kittelson obtained citywide 2040 land use information by TAZ (including households, population, and employment information) from the Alameda CTC travel demand model as well as citywide auto ownership information by Census Tract from the American Community Survey (ACS) data website. Kittelson estimated total evacuation trips by calculating the trips generated at the household level and trips generated at the non- residential level. Kittelson assumed 75% of the residents and 75% of the employees evacuated for each modeled scenario. The number of occupied households and employees by TAZ for each of the evacuation scenarios are summarized in the following evacuation results section for each scenario.

October 10, 2022 Page 5
City of Hayward Evacuation Analysis Methodology, Results, and Considerations Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

Evacuation Destination and Route Choice: For each evacuation TAZ, Kittelson assigned likely evacuation destinations based on Red Cross emergency evacuation destinations in the area. These include schools, community colleges, public libraries, and community centers. Evacuation destinations were assigned based on the location and direction of the evacuation. Destinations are selected for each evacuation scenario with the goal of identifying evacuation travel patterns and congestion throughout the City based on expected destinations. The distribution of the destinations is not intended to reflect a precise distribution of the routes that would be taken during an evacuation. The trips were distributed from each evacuating TAZ to each destination TAZ, as appropriate. The evacuating TAZ locations and destination TAZs for each evacuation scenario is provided in the Evacuation Results section.

EVACUATION RESULTS
Evacuation capacity analysis was conducted for the PM peak hour for the five (5) different evacuation scenarios. The results represent the peak hour conditions for a potential evacuation when non-evacuation traffic would be at its highest levels. Each evacuation scenario’s results are discussed below.

Wildfire Scenario
Under this scenario, the areas east of SR 238 were identified for evacuation evaluation. This scenario includes the Hayward Highland area including the Stonebrae Elementary School, California State University - East Bay, and neighborhoods east of SR 238 from Ward Creek in the north to Garin Park in the south, including the Mission-Garin neighborhood. The Hayward Highland area was identified for analysis because of its proximity to Garin Regional Park and Dry Creek Pioneer Regional Park which are Moderate CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Table 1 shows the number of occupied households and employees as well as the total estimated evacuation trips for this scenario.

Table 1: Modeled Wildfire Evacuation Trips for PM Peak Hour Evacuating
TAZs
Households

Population Employment Evacuation
Trips
697 766 2,171 278 1,037
698 609 1,703 60 734
699 768 1,950 62 920
701 504 1,348 154 751
703 538 1,439 376 1,130
704 852 2,329 170 1,608
705 1,776 6,326 92 3,193
706 0 0 950 529
710 587 1,714 28 711
711 1,797 4,901 38 2,150
712 1,587 4,810 120 1,945
713 294 983 36 422
768 695 2,174 490 1,402
769 400 1,252 217 771
SOURCE: ALAMEDA COUNTY TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL; KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC., 2022

October 10, 2022 Page 6
City of Hayward Evacuation Analysis Methodology, Results, and Considerations Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

The model indicates substantial over-capacity conditions on several roadways in the city as shown in Figure

2. Specifically, the roadways where volumes are at/exceed capacity include:
• Northbound I-880 (towards Oakland)
• Southbound I-880 (towards San Jose)
• Northbound SR-238 (towards San Leandro)
• Southbound SR-238 (towards Fremont)
• Eastbound SR - 92
• Eastbound W Jackson St (between Santa Clara St and SR-238) • Westbound W Jackson St (between SR-238 and Amador St) • Northbound Whitman St (between Harder Rd and Orchard Ave) • Northbound Hesparian Blvd (between W Winton Avenue and W A St) • Westbound Industrial Pkwy (between SR-238 and Hesparian Blvd) • Eastbound W Harder Rd (between SR-238 and Jackson St)

AA
AA
AA
A
AAAA
A
AA
AA
AAAA
A
AAA
AAA
AA
AAA
AAAA
A
A

AAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAA

AAAAAAAAA
AAA
AA
AA
AAAA
A
AA
AA
AAA
AAA
AAA
A

AAAAAAAAAAAAA
A
AA
AAA
A
AAA
AAA

AAAA AAA
AAA
A
AAA
AA
A

AAAAA AAAAA
AA
AA
A A
A
AA
A
AAA
AAAA
A
AAA
A
A
AA
AA
A
AA
A
AAA
AA
AA
AAA
AAAAA
AA
A
AAAA
AAAA
AA
A
AAAAA
AAA
AAAA
AA
AAAA
AAAAAA
AA
AAA

AAAA AAA

AAA AAAA
AA
AAA
AAA
AAA
A
AAA
AAA
AA
AAA
AAAA
AAAA
AAAA
AAA
AA

AAAA AAAAA
AAAAA
A
AAA
AA
AA
AA

AAAAAAA
AAAA
AAA
AAA
AA
A

AAAAAAA

AAAAAA A
AAAA
A

AAAAAAA
AAAA
A
AA

AAAA AAA
A
AAAA A
A AAA
AAAAA
AA
AAA
AAA
A
AAAA
A
AAAAAA
AAA
AA
A
AA
AAAA

AAAAAAA
AAA
AAA
AAA A
AAAAA
AA
AA
AAA
AAA

AAAAAAA
AAAA
AAA
AAA
A
AAAAAA

AAAAAAAA
A
AAAA
AA
AA
AA
A
AAA
AAAA
AAAA
A
AAAAAA
A AA
AAA
A
AA
AAA
AA AAA
A
AA
AA
AAAA
AAA
AA
AAA
AA
AAA
AAAAA
A
AAA
AA
AA A

AA AAAA
AA

A A AAAAA
A
A
A A
AA
A
A
AA
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
AAA
A
A

AAAAAAA
AAAA

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AA
AAAA
AA
AA
AA
A
AAA
AAA
AAA
AAA
AAA
AA
A
A

AAAA AAAAAAAAAAAA
AAA
AAAAAA
AAA

AAAAAAAAA
AAAA
A
AA
AAAA
AAA
AAA

AA AA AA
AA
AAA
AAAA
AAA AA

AAAAAAAAAAAAA
A
A AAAA
A
AAA
AAAAAA
AA
A AAA
AAAA
AA
AAA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
A
A AA
A
AAAA
AAA
AAA AA
AAAA
AA
AAAA
A
AA
AA

AAAAA AA
AAA AA
AA
A
AA
A
AAA

A AAAAAAAAAA
AAA
AA
AAAA
AAA
AAAAA
AAAA
AAA

AAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAA
A
AAAAA
AAAAAA
A AAAA
AA
A
AAAA
AAA
AAAA
A AA
AAA
AAAA
AAA
AA
AAA
AAAAA
AAAAA
AAAAAA
AAA
AA
A
AAA
AA

AAAAAAAAAAAAA
AA
AA

AAA AAAAAAAAAAA AA AAA
A
AAAAA
AAAAAA
A A
AAAA
AAAA
AAAA

AAAAAAAAAAA
AAAA
AAAAA
AAAAA
A

AAA AAAAAAA

AAAAAAAAAA
AA
AA
A
AA
A
AA
AAA
AAAA
A
A
AAA A
AAAAAA
AAAA
AA
AA
AAA
A
A
AAAA
AA
A
AAAA
AA A
A

AAA AAA AAA
A
AAA

AAAA AAAAAA
AA
AAAAA
AA
AAA
AAAAAA
AA
AAAAA

AAAAAAAAA
AA
AAA

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAA
AAAA

AAAAAAA AA
A
AAA
AA
AAAA
A
A

AAAAAAA
AAA
AA
AA

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAA
AA AAA
AAA

AAAAA AA
AAA
AA
AAA
AA
AA

AAAAAAAAAA
A

AAA AAAAAAA
AAA
AA
AA
AA
A

AAAAAAA
AA
AA
AAA
AA
AAAAA
A
A
AA
AA
A
AA
A AAA
AA
AAA
AAAA
AAAA
A
AAA
AAAA
A

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAA A
AA
A
AAA
AAA
AAA
AAA
A

AAA AAAA
AA
A
AA
AA
AA
AA
A
A
A
AA
AA
AAA
AA
AA
AA
A
AA
A A
AAA
AAA
AAA
A
A
A

A AAA AAA
AA
AAA
AA
A
A
AA
AA
A
A
AAAA
A
A
A
AAA
A

AAAAAAA
AAA
AAAA
M
a
n
o
r
D
r
Peralta Bl
Fremont Bl
W Jackson St
Alvarado Bl
S
u
n
o
l
R
i
d
g
e
T r
D
e
e
p
C
r
e
e
k
R
d
V
a l l e
y
T
r a
i l s
D
r
Beard Rd
W
L
a
s
P
o s i t a s
B
l
Bernal Av
Hopyard Rd
Hesperian Bl
P
a
s
e
o
P
a
d
r
e
P
w
M
o
w
r y
A
v
F
o
o
t
h
i l l
R
d
C
h
a
b
o
t
D
r
W
a
l n
u
t
A
v
V
a
l
l
e
y
A
v
S t o n e r i d g e D r
C
h
e
r
r
y
L
n
Third St
T
h
o
r
n
t o
n
A
v
Ardo St
R
i d
g
e
w
o
o
d
D
r
W A S t
F
a
l
c
o
n
D
r
Second St
T
a
m
a
y
o
S
t
D
a
r
w
i n
D
r
Mission Bl
M u i r w
o
o
d
D
r
Decoto Rd
N
ic
o
l e
t
A v
C
a n a
R
d
Alvarado Niles Rd
G
i b
r a
l t a
r
D
r
Alder Av
Lowry Rd
M
o
n
t e
c
i
t o D
r
A St
F
o
o
t
h
i
l l
B
l
Niles Bl
Jackson St
P
a
l o
m
a
r
e
s
R
d
N
i l e
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
R d
A
r d
e
n
w
o
o
d
B
l
C
o w i n g
R d
M
i s
s
i o
n
R
d
F
a
i r
v
i e
w
A
v
P
a
s
e
o
S
a
n t a C
r u
z
J
e
e
p
T
r
Willow Rd
I n d u s t r i a l P w W
L
i n d a
D
r
L
a
u r
e
l
C
r e
e
k
D r
V o
g
e
l
L
n
∙þ
92 ∙þ
238
∙þ
84 §¨¦
880
§¨¦
680
§¨¦
580
H:\26\26593 - Hayward Housing Element EIR\gis\KAI 26593 Hayward Housing Element EIR.aprx Date: 9/22/2022 Wildfire Scenario
Hayward, California
Figure 2
0 1 2Miles
[
AAAAAAOver Capacity (V/C > 1)
AAAAAACongested (V/C 0.9 to 1)
Uncongested (V/C under 0.9)
Destinations
Evacuation Zones
Hayward Boundary
October 10, 2022 Page 8
City of Hayward Evacuation Analysis Methodology, Results, and Considerations Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

Tsunami Scenario
Under this scenario, potential tsunami-related flooding is assumed to affect portions of the shoreline area (see Figure 3 for the potential affected area for this scenario). The Russell City neighborhood and Eden Landing Ecological Reserve & Eden Shores neighborhood west of the Union Pacific Rail Line were identified for a tsunami-based evacuation scenario evaluation based on the California Department of Conservation’s tsunami inundation map3 (affected area shown in Figure 3). Table 2 shows the number of occupied households and employees as well as the total estimated evacuation trips for the tsunami scenario.

Table 2: Modeled Tsunami Evacuation Trips for PM Peak Hour Evacuating
TAZs
Households Population Employment Evacuation
Trips
735 0 0 819 460
736 0 0 1,770 994
738 0 0 828 465
745 5 17 1,916 1,084
746 2 7 801 452
747 0 0 606 340
748 0 0 1,509 847
749 8 27 4,176 2,359
750 14 47 3,650 2,072
752 287 992 1,035 1,045
SOURCE: ALAMEDA COUNTY TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL; KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC., 2022 The model indicates substantial over-capacity conditions on several roadways in the city as shown in Figure

3. Specifically, the roadways where volumes are at/exceed capacity include:
• Northbound I-880 (towards Oakland)
• Southbound I-880 (towards San Jose)
• Northbound SR-238 (towards San Leandro)
• Southbound SR-238 (towards Fremont)
• Eastbound SR-92
• Eastbound W Jackson St (between I-880 and SR-238)
• Northbound Hesparian Blvd (between W Winton Avenue and W A St) • Southbound Hesparian Blvd (between SR-92 and south city limits) • Westbound Industrial Pkwy W (between Baumberg Ave and SR-238) • Eastbound W Winton Ave (between Cobalt Blvd and Hesparian Blvd) • Eastbound W Winton Ave (between Southland Dr and D St) • Eastbound W Harder Rd (between W Jackson St and SR-238) • Northbound Santa Clara St (between W Jackson St and north city limits) • Southbound Whitman St (between Orchard Ave and Tennyson Rd)

3 https://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/tsunami/maps/san-francisco, accessed August 2022.

AA
AA
AAAAA
AA
A
AA
AA
A
AAA
AA
AAA
AAAA
A
A

AAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAA
AAA
AA

AA AAAA
A
AAAAA
AAA

AAAAAAAAAAAAA

AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAA
A
AAA
AA

AAA AAA
AAA
A
AAA

AAA AAA
AA
A
A AA
AA A
A
AA
AA
A
AAA
A
AAA
AA
AAA
AAA
A
A
AAAA
AA
AAA
AAAAA
AAAA
AA
A
A
AAAA
AAA
A
A

AAAAAAA
AAA
AA
AA
AAA
AA
AAAAA
AAAA
AA
AAAA
AAA
A
AAA
AAAAAA
AAA
AA
AAAAA
AA
AAAAA
A
AAA
AA

AA AAAA
AAAA
AAA
AAA
A

AAAAAAA

AAAAAA A
AAAA
A
AAAAA

AAAAAAA
AAAA
AAA
A
AAAA
A
AAAAA
AAA
A
A AAA
AAA
AAA
A
AAA
A
AAAAA

AAAA AA AA
AAAA
AA
A
AA A
AAAAAA
AAAA
A
AA AAA
AAAAAA
A
AAA
AA
AAA
AAA

AAA AAA

AAAAAAAAA
AA
AA
AA
A
AAA
AA
AAA
AAAA
AAAA
A
AAA
AAAA
AAA
AAAAAA
AA
AAA
A
AAA
A
AAAA
AA
AA
AA
AAAA
AA
AAA
AAA
AAA
AAA
AA
A
A
A AA
A
AAAA
A
A

A A AAAAA
A
A AAAA
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
AA
A
A
A
AA
A
A

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAA
AAAA
A
AAA
AA

AAAAAAA
AA
AAA
AAA
A

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAA
AAA
AAAAAA
AAA
AAAA
AAA
A

AAAAAAAAA
AA

AA AA AA
AA
AAAA
AAAA

AAA AAA AA
A
AAAA
A AAAA
AAAA
A
AAAA
AA
AAAA
A
A
AA
AAAA
A
AAAA
AA
AAAA
AAA
AAAA
AAAA
A A
AA
AA
AAA

A AAAAAAAAAA
AAA
A
AAA
AA
AA

AAAAAAAAA

AAAAAAAA
AAAAAA
AA
A AAAA
A
AAAA
AAA
AAA
AA
AAA
AAA
AAAA
AA
AAAAA
A
AAAAA
AAAAA
AAAAAA
A
A
AAA AA

AAAAAAAAAAAAA

AAAAA A
AA
AAA
AA

AAAAAAAAAAA AA
AAAAAA
AAAAAA
AA
A
A

AAAAAA AAAA
AAA
AAAA

AAAAAAAAAAA
A
AAAA
AAAAA

AAAAAAA

AAAAAAAAAA
A
AAAAAA
AA

AAAAAAA
AA
AA
AAA
AA
AAA
AAAA
AA

AAA AAA

AAAA AAA AA
A
AAA

AAAAAAAA
A
AAAAA
A
A
A
AAAA
A
AA

A AAAAA
AAA
AAAAA
AA
AA
AA
AAAA
AAA
AA
AAAA
AA
A
A
AA
AAAA
AAA
A
A
AA
A
A
A
A
AA
AAAA
AA
AAA
A

AAA AAAAA
AAA
AAA
A

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAA AA
AAAAAA
A
A
AAA
AAA
AAA
AAA
AAA
A
AA
A
A
A
AAA
AA
AA
AA
AA
A AAAA
A
AA
AAAA
AAAAAA
A
AAAA
A
A

AAAAAAA
AAAA
M
a
n
o
r
D
r
Peralta Bl
Fremont Bl
W Jackson St
Alvarado Bl
S
u
n
o
l
R
i
d
g
e
T r
D
e
e
p
C
r
e
e
k
R
d
V
a l l e
y
T
r a
i l s
D
r
Beard Rd
W
L
a
s
P
o s i t a s
B
l
Bernal Av
Hopyard Rd
Hesperian Bl
P
a
s
e
o
P
a
d
r
e
P
w
M
o
w
r y
A
v
F
o
o
t
h
i l l
R
d
C
h
a
b
o
t
D
r
W
a
l n
u
t
A
v
V
a
l
l
e
y
A
v
S t o n e r i d g e D r
C
h
e
r
r
y
L
n
Third St
T
h
o
r
n
t o
n
A
v
Ardo St
R
i d
g
e
w
o
o
d
D
r
W A S t
F
a
l
c
o
n
D
r
Second St
T
a
m
a
y
o
S
t
D
a
r
w
i n
D
r
Mission Bl
M u i r w
o
o
d
D
r
Decoto Rd
N
ic
o
l e
t
A v
C
a n a
R
d
Alvarado Niles Rd
G
i b
r a
l t a
r
D
r
Alder Av
Lowry Rd
M
o
n
t e
c
i
t o D
r
A St
F
o
o
t
h
i
l l
B
l
Niles Bl
Jackson St
P
a
l o
m
a
r
e
s
R
d
N
i l e
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
R d
A
r d
e
n
w
o
o
d
B
l
C
o w i n g
R d
M
i s
s
i o
n
R
d
F
a
i r
v
i e
w
A
v
P
a
s
e
o
S
a
n t a C
r u
z
J
e
e
p
T
r
Willow Rd
I n d u s t r i a l P w W
L
i n d a
D
r
L
a
u r
e
l
C
r e
e
k
D r
V o
g
e
l
L
n
∙þ
92 ∙þ
238
∙þ
84 §¨¦
880
§¨¦
680
§¨¦
580
H:\26\26593 - Hayward Housing Element EIR\gis\KAI 26593 Hayward Housing Element EIR.aprx Date: 9/22/2022 Tsunami
Hayward, California
Figure 3
0 1 2Miles
[
AAAAAAOver Capacity (V/C > 1)
AAAAAACongested (V/C 0.9 to 1)
Uncongested (V/C under 0.9)
Destinations
Evacuation Zones
Hayward Boundary
October 10, 2022 Page 10
City of Hayward Evacuation Analysis Methodology, Results, and Considerations Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

Dam Failure Scenario
Under this scenario, the potential flooding from a failure of the New Calaveras Dam is assumed to affect portions of South Hayward (see Figure 4 for the potential evacuation area for this scenario). Evacuation is expected to be primarily directed north of the City. The industrial areas south of Industrial Parkway West including the Carpenter neighborhood, the Southeast corner of Glen Eden and the Stratford Village Park neighborhood south of Tennyson Alquire are the main inundation zones, which have been identified from State of California and Department of Water Resources’ Division Safety of Dams (DSOD) dam breach inundation map4. Table 3 shows the number of occupied households and employees and total estimated evacuation trips.

Table 3: Modeled Dam Failure Evacuation Trips for PM Peak Hour

S
OURCE: ALAMEDA COUNTY TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL; KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC., 2022 The model indicates substantial over-capacity conditions on several roadways in the city as shown in Figure

4. Specifically, the roadways where volumes are at/exceed capacity include:
• Northbound I-880 (towards Oakland)
• Southbound I-880 (towards San Jose)
• Northbound SR-238 (towards San Leandro)
• Southbound SR-238 (towards Fremont)
• Eastbound SR-92
• Eastbound W Jackson St (between I-880 and SR-238)
• Northbound Hesparian Blvd (between La Playa Dr and W A St) • Northbound Hesparian Blvd (between Eden Shores Blvd and California 92) • Westbound Industrial Pkwy W (between I-880 and SR-92) • Northbound Huntwood Rd (between Whipple Rd and W Harder Rd) • Northbound Santa Clara St (between W Jackson St and north city limits) • Eastbound Winton Ave/D St (between Southland Dr and SR-238) • Eastbound W Harder Rd (between W Jackson St and SR-238) • Eastbound Teenyson Rd (between Portsmouth Ave and SR-238)

4 https://fmds.water.ca.gov/webgis/?appid=dam_prototype_v2, accessed August 2022.

Evacuating
TAZs
Households Population Employment Trips
753 2 7 827 2,356
754 744 2,467 1,326 756
757 1,239 4,879 228 133
758 0 0 937 1,640
762 763 2,425 2,600 1,482
764 0 0 4,152 2,367
765 0 0 4,101 4,714
766 1,911 7,157 1,024 3,711
767 545 1,951 77 862
1504 1,644 5,229 392 1,388
AAA
AAAAA
A
AA AA
AA AAA
A
A
AAAAAA
AAAA
AAAA
A

AAAAAAAAAAAA

AAAAAAAAAAA
A
AA
AA
AA
A
AA
AAAA

AAAA AAAAAAAAA

AAAAAAAAAAAAA
A A
AAAAAA
AA
AA
A AAA
AAA
AA
A
A
A
AAA
A
AAA
AA
AA
AA
A
A
A
AAA
A

AAA AAA AAAA
A

AAAAAAAA
AA AAA
A

AAA AAAA
AAA
AAA
AAAA
A
AAAAA
AAAAA
AA
AAA
AAAAA
AAAAA
AAA
A
AAA
A

AA AAAAAAA
AAAA
AA
AAAA
AAA
AAA
AA
A
A

AAAAAAAAAAA
A
AA
AAAAAA
AAAA
AAAA
AA
AAAA
AA
AA
AAA A
A
AA
AAAA
AAA
AAAA
AA
AA
AAAA
AA
AA
AAAA
AAA
AAAA
AA
AAAAA

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
A
A
AA
AAA
AA
AA

AAAAA A
AAAA
AA
AAA
AAA
A
AAA
AA
AAAA
AA
AA
A
A
AAA
AA
AA
AA
A
A
AAA
AAAA
A
AA
AAAAAA
AA

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AA A
AA
AAAAAA
AA
AAA
AA
AAAA
AAAAA
AAAA
AAAA

AAAAAAAAA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AAAA
A
AAAA
AA
A
AAA
A
A
AAAAAA
A
AAA
A A
A
A
A
A A
AA A
A
AA
AA
A
A

AAA AAA
A
A
A
A AAA
AAA

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAA
AAA
A
AAAA
A
AAAAAA
A
AA

AAAAAAAAA
AA
AAA
AAA AA
AAA
AAA

AAAAAA AAAA
A

AAAA AAAAAAAAAAAA
AAA
AAAA
AAAAAA
AAAAA

AAAAAAAAA
AAAA
AAA
A
AAA
AAAAA
A

AAAAAAAA
AAA
AA

AA AA AA
AA
AAA
AAAA

AAA AAAAAA

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AA
A
AAAA
AAA
A AAAA

AAAAAAA
A
AAAA
AAAAAA

AAAAAAAA AAA
A
AA
AAAA
AAAA
A
AAA
AAAA
AAAA
A
AAA
AAA
A
AAAAA
A
AA
A
A
AA
A
AAA

A AAAAAAAAAA
AAAAA
AA
AA
AAA
A
AA

AAAAAAAAA
AAA
AAAAA
AAAAAA
AAA
AAAAAA
AAA
A
AAAA
AAA
AAA
AA
AAA
AAA
AAAA
AA
AAA
AA
AA
A
AAAAA
AAAAA
AAAAAA
AAA
AAAA
A
AA

AAAAAAAAAAAAA

AAAAA A
AA
AA
AAA

AAAAAAAAAAA AA
AAA
AA
AAA
AAA

A AAAAAA

AAAAAAA
AAA
AAAAA
AAAAA
AAA

AAAAAA AAAAAA
A
AAA
A
AA
AAAA

AAAAAAAAAAA

AAAAAAAA
AA
AAA
AAAA
AA
AAA
AA
AA
AA
AAAA
A
AAAAA
A

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAA
AA
AAA
AA
A
AA
A

AAAAAAA
AAAAA
AA
AAAAAA

AAAAAAA
AAAAAA
AAA
AA
AAA
AAAAAA
A
AAAA
AAAA
AA
A
A
AAA

AAAA AAAAAA
AA

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
A
AAA
A

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

AAAAAA A
A
A AAAA
A
AAAAAA

AAAAAAAA
AAA
A AAAA

AAAAAAAAAAAAA
AA
AA
A
AA
AAA
AAAAAA

AAAAAAAAA
AA
AA
AA
AAA
AA
AA
AAAAA
AAAA
A
AAAAAA
AA
AAA
A
AAA
A

AA AAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAA
AAA
AAA
A
AA
AA
A
AA
A
AA
A
AA
A
A
AA

AAAAAAA
AAAAA
AAA
AAAA

AAA AAAA
A

AA AAAA
A AA
AAAA
AAA
A
AAA

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
A
A
AAAA
A
A
A
AAA
AAA
AAA
AAA
AAAAAA
AA
A

AAA AAA
AA
A
AAAAA
AA
AA
AA A
AA
AA
A
AA AAA
A AAA
A
A
AAA
AA
AAAAA
A
AAAA
A
A
A
A
A
AAA
AA
A
AA A

AAAAAAA
AAAA
M
a
n
o
r
D
r
Peralta Bl
Fremont Bl
W Jackson St
Alvarado Bl
S
u
n
o
l
R
i
d
g
e
T r
D
e
e
p
C
r
e
e
k
R
d
V
a l l e
y
T
r a
i l s
D
r
Beard Rd
W
L
a
s
P
o s i t a s
B
l
Bernal Av
Hopyard Rd
Hesperian Bl
P
a
s
e
o
P
a
d
r
e
P
w
M
o
w
r y
A
v
F
o
o
t
h
i l l
R
d
C
h
a
b
o
t
D
r
W
a
l n
u
t
A
v
V
a
l
l
e
y
A
v
S t o n e r i d g e D r
C
h
e
r
r
y
L
n
Third St
T
h
o
r
n
t o
n
A
v
Ardo St
R
i d
g
e
w
o
o
d
D
r
W A S t
F
a
l
c
o
n
D
r
Second St
T
a
m
a
y
o
S
t
D
a
r
w
i n
D
r
Mission Bl
M u i r w
o
o
d
D
r
Decoto Rd
N
ic
o
l e
t
A v
C
a n a
R
d
Alvarado Niles Rd
G
i b
r a
l t a
r
D
r
Alder Av
Lowry Rd
M
o
n
t e
c
i
t o D
r
A St
F
o
o
t
h
i
l l
B
l
Niles Bl
Jackson St
P
a
l o
m
a
r
e
s
R
d
N
i l e
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
R d
A
r d
e
n
w
o
o
d
B
l
C
o w i n g
R d
M
i s
s
i o
n
R
d
F
a
i r
v
i e
w
A
v
P
a
s
e
o
S
a
n t a C
r u
z
J
e
e
p
T
r
Willow Rd
I n d u s t r i a l P w W
L
i n d a
D
r
L
a
u r
e
l
C
r e
e
k
D r
V o
g
e
l
L
n
∙þ
92 ∙þ
238
∙þ
84 §¨¦
880
§¨¦
680
§¨¦
580
H:\26\26593 - Hayward Housing Element EIR\gis\KAI 26593 Hayward Housing Element EIR.aprx Date: 9/22/2022 New Calaveras Dam Failure
Hayward, California
Figure 4
0 1 2Miles
[
AAAAAAOver Capacity (V/C > 1)
AAAAAACongested (V/C 0.9 to 1)
Uncongested (V/C under 0.9)
Destinations
Evacuation Zones
Hayward Boundary
October 10, 2022 Page 12
City of Hayward Evacuation Analysis Methodology, Results, and Considerations Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

Downtown Pipeline Failure Scenario
This scenario considers the neighborhoods around A Street in downtown as the Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) natural gas pipeline roughly follows the street orientation . The scenario evacuates the Burbank neighborhood, the northern sections of Santa Clara, Longwood –Winton Grove neighborhoods, and the southern sections of the Cherryland, Hayward Acres and North Hayward neighborhoods (see Figure 5 for the potential evacuation area for this scenario). Table 4 shows the number of occupied households and employees and total estimated evacuation trips.

Table 4: Modeled Downtown Pipeline Failure Evacuation Trips for PM Peak Hour Evacuating
TAZs
Households Population Employment Evacuation
Trips
636 908 2,998 456 1,184
657 84 201 54 124
659 138 331 248 297
660 249 596 371 491
662 212 523 146 320
663 160 383 136 257
664 113 271 238 263
667 1,032 2,496 335 1,353
672 93 222 144 185
673 157 392 130 250
677 9 30 71 56
678 1,394 5,336 573 2,047
680 813 2,757 1,172 1,785
682 334 1,014 75 471
683 134 455 32 190
685 242 834 93 362
686 1,051 3,614 110 1,400
688 589 1,592 52 786
1484 371 1,224 187 486
1489 11 37 84 65
1490 126 435 32 179
1491 126 435 32 179
1493 126 435 32 179
1494 279 667 181 417
1495 68 232 38 108
1496 362 1,244 149 550
1499 13 32 130 88
SOURCE: ALAMEDA COUNTY TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL; KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC., 2022 The model indicates substantial over-capacity conditions on several roadways in the city as shown in Figure

5. Specifically, roadways where volumes are at/exceed capacity include:
• Northbound I-880 (towards Oakland)
• Southbound I-880 (towards San Jose)
• Northbound SR-238 (towards San Leandro)
• Southbound SR-238 (towards Fremont)
• Eastbound SR-92
• Eastbound W Jackson St (between I-880 and SR-238)
• Southbound Hesparian Blvd (between W A St and S Pepsi Dr) October 10, 2022 Page 13
City of Hayward Evacuation Analysis Methodology, Results, and Considerations Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
• Eastbound Industrial Pkwy W (between Baumberg Ave and SR-238) • Eastbound W Winton Ave (between Hesparian Blvd and D St) • Eastbound W A St (between Hesparian Blvd and SR-238)
• Eastbound W Harder Rd (between W Jackson St and Jane Ave)

AA
AA
AAAA
AAAA
A
AA
AAAAAA
AA AAA
AA
AAA
AA
AAA
A
A

AAAAAAAA

AAAAAAAA
A
AAA
AA

AA AAAA
A
A
AAAA
AAAAA
AAA
AAA

AAAAA AAAAAA
A
AAAAAA
A
AAA
A AAA
AAA
AAA
AAA AA
AA AAA
A
AAAA
A
AAA
AAAA
A
AA
AA
AAA
A
AA
AA
AAA
A
AAAAAA
AA

A AAAAAAA
A
A
AA
AAAA
AAAA

AAAAA AA
AAA
AA
AAAA
AAA
AAAA
AA
AA
AAA
A A
AAA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
A
AAA
AAAAA
AAA
AA
AAA
AAAAA
A
AAA
AA
AA
AA
AA

AAAAAAA
AAAA
AAA
A

AAAAAAA

AAAAAA A
AAAA
A
AA
AAAAA
AAAA
AAA
AA
A
AAAA
A
A AA
A
A A
A
AAAA
A
AAA
AA
AAAA

AAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAA
AA
AAAA
AA
AA
A
A
AAAAA
A
AAAA
A
AAAA
A

AAAAAAAAA

AAA AAAAAA

AAAA AA
AA
AAA
A
AA
AA
AAA

AAAAAAA

AAA AAAAAA
AAAAAA
AAA
AAA
AAAA
AA
A
AAA A
AAA
AAA
AA
AAA
AAAA
A
AAA
AAAA
AAAAAA
AA
AAA
AAAA

AAAAAAAAAAA
AAAA
AAA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AAAA
AAAAAA
AAA
AAA
AAA
A
AAA
AA
AA
A
AAA
A
AAA
A
A
AAAAAA
A
AA
A
A
A
AAAAA
A
A A
AA
A AA
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
AAA
A
AA
AA
AA
A
A AAA
AAAA

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAA
AAA
AAAA
AA
AA
AAA
AAA
A

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAA
AAA
AAAAAA

AAAAAAAAA
AAA
AAAA
AAA
AA
A
AAAA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AAAA
AAAA

AAA AAAAA

AAAAAAAAAAAAA

A AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AA
AA

AAAAAAA
AA
AA
A AAAA
AAAA
AAA
AAAA
AA
AA

AAAAAAA
A
A
AA
AAA
AAAA
AA
AAA AA

AAA AAAA
AA
A
AAA
AA
AAA
A
AA

AA AAAA
AA A
A
AA
AA
AAA
AA

A AAAAAAAAAA

AAAAAAAA
AAAA
AAAA
A
AAA

AAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAA
A
AAAA
AAA
AAAAAA

AAAAAAA
A
AAAA
AAA
AAA
AA
AAA
AAA
AAAA
AA
AAA
AAA
AAA
A
AAAAA
A
AAAAA
AAAAAA
A
AAA
A
A
AAAAAA
A
AA

AAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAA

A AAAAAAAAAAA AA
AAA
AA
AAAAAA
AAAAAA

AAAAAA AAAAAA
AAA
AAAA

AAAAAAAAAAA
AAAA
A
AAAA
AA

AAAAAAA

AAAAAAAAAA
AA
A
A
AA

AAAAAAA
AAA
AAAAA
AAAA
AAAAAA

AAAAAAAA AAA
AAA
AA
AA
AA
A
AAAAAA
AA
AA

AAA AAAA
AAAAAA
AA A
A
AAA
AAA

AAA AAA

AAAA AAAAAA
AA
A
AA
A
AAAA

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAA
A
AAAAAA
A

AAAAAAAA
AAAA
AAA

AAAAAAAAAAAAAA

AAAAAAAA
AA
AA

AA AAAAA
AA
AAAA
AA
AA
A
AAAA
AA
A
AA
AA
A
A
AAA
A

A AAAAA
AAAA
AAA
A

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAA
A
AA
A
AAAA
AA
A
AAA
AAA
AAA
AAA
AA
AA
A
AA
AAAA
AA
AAA
AA
A
A
A AAA
A AAAA
AA
A
AAAA
A
AAAAA
A
A
AAA
AAAA
A
A
A
A

AAAAAAA
AAA
M
a
n
o
r
D
r
Peralta Bl
Fremont Bl
W Jackson St
Alvarado Bl
S
u
n
o
l
R
i
d
g
e
T r
D
e
e
p
C
r
e
e
k
R
d
V
a l l e
y
T
r a
i l s
D
r
Beard Rd
W
L
a
s
P
o s i t a s
B
l
Bernal Av
Hopyard Rd
Hesperian Bl
P
a
s
e
o
P
a
d
r
e
P
w
M
o
w
r y
A
v
F
o
o
t
h
i l l
R
d
C
h
a
b
o
t
D
r
W
a
l n
u
t
A
v
V
a
l
l
e
y
A
v
S t o n e r i d g e D r
C
h
e
r
r
y
L
n
Third St
T
h
o
r
n
t o
n
A
v
Ardo St
R
i d
g
e
w
o
o
d
D
r
W A S t
F
a
l
c
o
n
D
r
Second St
T
a
m
a
y
o
S
t
D
a
r
w
i n
D
r
Mission Bl
M u i r w
o
o
d
D
r
Decoto Rd
N
ic
o
l e
t
A v
C
a n a
R
d
Alvarado Niles Rd
G
i b
r a
l t a
r
D
r
Alder Av
Lowry Rd
M
o
n
t e
c
i
t o D
r
A St
F
o
o
t
h
i
l l
B
l
Niles Bl
Jackson St
P
a
l o
m
a
r
e
s
R
d
N
i l e
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
R d
A
r d
e
n
w
o
o
d
B
l
C
o w i n g
R d
M
i s
s
i o
n
R
d
F
a
i r
v
i e
w
A
v
P
a
s
e
o
S
a
n t a C
r u
z
J
e
e
p
T
r
Willow Rd
I n d u s t r i a l P w W
L
i n d a
D
r
L
a
u r
e
l
C
r e
e
k
D r
V o
g
e
l
L
n
∙þ
92 ∙þ
238
∙þ
84 §¨¦
880
§¨¦
680
§¨¦
580
H:\26\26593 - Hayward Housing Element EIR\gis\KAI 26593 Hayward Housing Element EIR.aprx Date: 9/22/2022 Downtown Pipeline Failure
Hayward, California
Figure 5
0 1 2Miles
[
AAAAAAOver Capacity (V/C > 1)
AAAAAACongested (V/C 0.9 to 1)
Uncongested (V/C under 0.9)
Destinations
Evacuation Zones
Hayward Boundary
October 10, 2022 Page 15
City of Hayward Evacuation Analysis Methodology, Results, and Considerations Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

Eden/Southgate Pipeline Failure Scenario
This scenario considers the evacuation of the geographical area corresponding to Southland Mall to the north and Chabot College to the south, simulating a PG&E natural gas pipeline failure in the vicinity. This area is bounded by Industrial Boulevard/Clawtier Road on the west, I-880 on the east, Winton Avenue on the north, and US 92 on the south side (see Figure 6 for the evacuation area for this scenario). Table 5 shows the number of occupied households and employees and total estimated evacuation trips.

Table 5: Modeled Pipeline Failure Evacuation Trips for PM Peak Hour Evacuating
TAZs
Households Population Employment Evacuation
Trips
725 138 416 3,748 2,333
727 633 1,933 228 1,038
728 1,009 3,056 296 1,818
729 69 209 938 646
730 514 1,567 508 1,129
731 327 991 239 671
SOURCE: ALAMEDA COUNTY TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL; KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC., 2022 The model indicates substantial over-capacity conditions on several roadways in the city as shown in Figure

6. Specifically, roadways where volumes are at/exceed capacity include:
• Northbound I-880 (towards Oakland)
• Southbound I-880 (towards San Jose)
• Northbound SR-238 (towards San Leandro)
• Southbound SR-238 (towards Fremont)
• Eastbound SR-92
• Eastbound W Jackson St (between I-880 and SR-238)
• Southbound Hesparian Blvd (between Depot Rd and Catalpa Rd) • Eastbound W Winton Ave (between Southland Dr and D St) • Northbound Santa Clara St (between W Jackson St and W A St) • Eastbound Industrial Pkwy W (between Industrial Pkwy SW and SR-238) • Whitman St (between W Harder Rd and Tennyson Rd)

AA
AA
AAA
A
AA
AA
AA
AAAA
A
AAA
AAA
AA
AAA
AAAA
A
AA

AAAAAAAAAAAA

AAAAAAAAAA
AAA
AA
AA
AAA
AA
AA
AAAA
AA
AAA
AA
AAA
AAA
A

AAAAAAAAAAAAA

AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAA
A
AAA

AAA AAA
AAA
A
AA
AAA
AA
A
A AAA
A
AA
AAA
A
AA
AA
AAA
AA
A
AAA
AAA
AAAA
AA
AAAAA
A AAAA
A
AAAA
A
A
AAA
A
A

AA A AA
AA
AAA
AAA
AAAA
AAAA
AAAA
AA
AAAA
AAA
A A
AAA
AAA
AA
AAA
AAAA
AAA
AAA
AA
AAAAA
AAAAA
A
AAA
AA
AA
AA
AAAA
AAAA
AAA
AAA
AA
A

AAAAAAA

AAAAAA A
AAAA
A
AA
A

AAAAAAA
AAAA
A
AA
A
A
AAAA
A
A
AAAAA
AAA
A
AAAA
AAA
A
AAAA
AAAAAA
AA
AA
A
AAAA
AA
A
AAA A
AAA
AAA
AA
AA
AAA
AAAA
AAAA
AA
AAA
AAAAAA
AAAAAA
AA
AAA
A
AAA
AA
A
AA
A
AAA
A
AAA
AAA A
AAA
AA
AA
A
AAA
AAAA
AAAAAA
A AA
AAA
A
AA
AAAAAA
A
AA
AA
AAAA
AA

AAA AAA
AAA
AAA

AAAAAAA
A
A
AA
AAA
A
A
AA AAA
A

A AAAAA
A
A
A
A AAAA
A
A
A
AAAA
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A

AAAAAAA
AAAA

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AA
AAAA
AAA
AAAA
AA
AA
AAA
A

AAAA AAAAAAAAAAAA
AAA
AAAAAA
AAA
AAAA
AAA
AAAA
AAA
AA
AA

AA AA AAA
AAAA
AAA AA
A
AAAA
AA
A AAAA
AAAA
AA
AAAA
AA

AAAAAAA
A
A
A
AAAA
A
AAAA
AAA
AAAA
AAA
AAAA
AAA
AAAA
A A
AAAAA

A AAAAAAAAAA
AAA
A
AAA

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAA
A A
A
AAAA
AAA
AAA
AA
AAA
AAAA
AA
AAA
A
AAAAA
AAAAA
AAAAAA
A
AAA
A
AA

AAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAA
AA

A AAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAA
AAAAAA

AAAAAA AAAA
AAA
AAAA

AAAAAAAAAAA
A
AAAA
AAAAA
AAA
AA

AAAAAAA

AAAAAAAAAA
A
AA
AAAA

AAAAAAAAAAA
AA
AA
AAAA A

AAA AAA

AAAA AAAAAA
AA
A
AAA

AAAA AAA
A
AAAA
A
A
AAA
A
AA
AAAA
A
AA
AA
AAAAA
AAAAA
AAAAA
AA
AA
AA
AAAA
AAA
AA

AAAAAA AAAAA
A
A
A
A
AA
A
A A
A AAA
AAAA

AAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAA A
A
AAA
A
AAA
A
AA
A
AA
AA A
AA
AA
A AAAA
AA
AAAA
A
AA
AAAA
M
a
n
o
r
D
r
Peralta Bl
Fremont Bl
W Jackson St
Alvarado Bl
S
u
n
o
l
R
i
d
g
e
T r
D
e
e
p
C
r
e
e
k
R
d
V
a l l e
y
T
r a
i l s
D
r
Beard Rd
W
L
a
s
P
o s i t a s
B
l
Bernal Av
Hopyard Rd
Hesperian Bl
P
a
s
e
o
P
a
d
r
e
P
w
M
o
w
r y
A
v
F
o
o
t
h
i l l
R
d
C
h
a
b
o
t
D
r
W
a
l n
u
t
A
v
V
a
l
l
e
y
A
v
S t o n e r i d g e D r
C
h
e
r
r
y
L
n
Third St
T
h
o
r
n
t o
n
A
v
Ardo St
R
i d
g
e
w
o
o
d
D
r
W A S t
F
a
l
c
o
n
D
r
Second St
T
a
m
a
y
o
S
t
D
a
r
w
i n
D
r
Mission Bl
M u i r w
o
o
d
D
r
Decoto Rd
N
ic
o
l e
t
A v
C
a n a
R
d
Alvarado Niles Rd
G
i b
r a
l t a
r
D
r
Alder Av
Lowry Rd
M
o
n
t e
c
i
t o D
r
A St
F
o
o
t
h
i
l l
B
l
Niles Bl
Jackson St
P
a
l o
m
a
r
e
s
R
d
N
i l e
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
R d
A
r d
e
n
w
o
o
d
B
l
C
o w i n g
R d
M
i s
s
i o
n
R
d
F
a
i r
v
i e
w
A
v
P
a
s
e
o
S
a
n t a C
r u
z
J
e
e
p
T
r
Willow Rd
I n d u s t r i a l P w W
L
i n d a
D
r
L
a
u r
e
l
C
r e
e
k
D r
V o
g
e
l
L
n
∙þ
92 ∙þ
238
∙þ
84 §¨¦
880
§¨¦
680
§¨¦
580
H:\26\26593 - Hayward Housing Element EIR\gis\KAI 26593 Hayward Housing Element EIR.aprx Date: 9/22/2022 Eden/Southgate Pipeline Failure
Hayward, California
Figure 6
0 1 2Miles
[
AAAAAAOver Capacity (V/C > 1)
AAAAAACongested (V/C 0.9 to 1)
Uncongested (V/C under 0.9)
Destinations
Evacuation Zones
Hayward Boundary
October 10, 2022 Page 17
City of Hayward Evacuation Analysis Methodology, Results, and Considerations Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

Limitations
The results of this memo are intended to identify potential congested locations during modeled evacuation scenarios. These scenarios were developed based on conservative assumptions and modeling techniques that reflect current understanding of evacuation analysis. These scenarios are intended to model a potential range of different evacuation scenarios but not all possible scenarios.

The scenarios represent potential emergency occurring in a portion of the City of Hayward. Actual emergencies may occur at other locations in the City and the specific conditions of an emergency evacuation could result in evacuation behavior that diverges from the definitions and assumptions used for this analysis. As a result, the identified scenarios and evacuation constraints represent informed estimates of the most likely potential evacuation scenario footprints and capacity constraints based on available data.

EVACUATION PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS
This section describes evacuation planning considerations and strategies for improving the capacity and resilience of the City’s roadway network to support future evacuation events. The strategies and considerations were identified based on previous congestion and evacuation studies, review of recent evacuation efforts, effective evacuation planning practices identified by US Department of Transportation (USDOT)
5, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)6, California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services7, American Red Cross and staff feedback. The strategies are organized into five (5) categories:

1. Traffic Management

2. Communications

3. Vulnerable Populations

4. Public Education

5. Resource Management

5 Using Highways During Evacuation Operations for Events with Advance Notice, Routes to Effective Evacuation Planning Primer Series, USDOT, FHWA, Accessed August 2022. 6 Using Highways for No-Notice Evacuations: Five Planning Considerations, FHWA, Accessed August 2022. 7 October 10, 2022 Page 18
City of Hayward Evacuation Analysis Methodology, Results, and Considerations Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

Traffic Management
This section includes infrastructure-related strategies that will aid in efficient and expeditious evacuation traffic flows, which is the most critical and challenging element in a successful evacuation. For each infrastructure-related treatments, it is necessary to consider downstream capacity limitations and identify if those limits limit or nullify the potential benefits of the treatment. Table 6 outlines each of these strategies and provides a brief description of the strategy and desired outcomes.

Table 6: Roadway and Intersection Capacity and Resilience Related Strategies Strategy Action Items
Limited contra flow on
highways
Reverse one or more lanes of highway to accommodate an increased flow of traffic in one direction.

Unlimited contra flow on
highways
Redirect of all lanes of a designated evacuation route to accommodate rapid evacuation from a city or region.

Limited/unlimited contra
flow on unlimited access
arterials
Temporarily close inbound travel lanes on selected unlimited access arterials (such as parkways and boulevards) to allow outbound traffic to utilize these lanes during evacuation.

Phased releases at major
parking centers
Implement a coordinated release of evacuation traffic from parking facilities that would reduce congestion on evacuation routes, especially in the downtown area. A phased release protocol could be developed for each parking facility, depending on size, location, and other relevant factors.

Closure of inbound lanes
on selected roads and
highways
Close inbound lanes on highways utilized for evacuation routes to prevent drivers on these routes from entering the city while evacuation is underway.

Restrict left-turn
movements
Minimize left-turn movements along evacuation routes and on roads leading to evacuation routes.

Suspension of tolls Consider coordinating suspension of tolls to encourage people to use toll roads to reduce bottlenecks at toll collection booths.

Signage
Use variable message board equipment and targeted installation of permanent dynamic message signs on evacuation routes to improve communication and reduce public confusion.

Stage tow trucks Consider how to stage tow trucks at bottleneck locations along evacuation routes to help detect and clear minor crashes and maintain traffic flows.

Adjust signal timing Increase the green time and/or progression band for through movements leading out of an evacuation zone.

Signal operation during
power outage Identify, prioritize, and install signal battery backups in case signal operations need to be maintained during a power outage. Consider using channeling October 10, 2022 Page 19
City of Hayward Evacuation Analysis Methodology, Results, and Considerations Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

Strategy Action Items
devices, static signs, and coning strategies to manage intersection flow during power outage if the signals lack power.

Additional access routes
Identify and communicate with communities that have at least two access points. Prioritize adding additional access to communities which are currently served by only one or two access points.

Bus system
Develop transportation solutions such as the use of a bus system for evacuating individuals with special needs (such as those with mobility limitations).

Traffic control points
Establish traffic control points (i.e., locations along designated evacuation routes with emergency management personnel) to maintain a greater degree of evacuation management. These locations could enhance the efficiency of an evacuation, reduce public confusion, and allow increased operational flexibility during an evacuation.

Stay-at-home requests
Identify unaffected communities and request individuals to stay at home during evacuations to help reduce roadway capacity constraints and minimize traffic during evacuation operations.

Early evacuation of
vulnerable communities
Consider incorporating early evacuations under high-risk conditions for vulnerable communities with limited egress routes.

Identify evacuation
capacity-increasing
projects
Consider locations identified as capacity-constrained (see the Evacuation Results section) for improvements to allow for increased evacuation capacity to reduce evacuation congestion.

Identify and earmark, or apply for grant funds, for infrastructure improvements to support evacuation capacity enhancing projects.

Evacuation operations
staff capacity
Improve staff capacity to conduct signal coordination during evacuation events for changed or uninterrupted flow.

Improve staff capacity to communicate evacuation routing, closures, or other messages through changeable message signs.

October 10, 2022 Page 20
City of Hayward Evacuation Analysis Methodology, Results, and Considerations Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

Communications
This section describes communication strategies that address how information may be shared among agencies, organizations, and to the general public for evacuations. During an emergency evacuation event, two types of communication take place: (1) communication among entities involved in the management of response, and (2) communication between the city and the general public. Table 7 outlines each of these strategies and provides a brief description of the strategy and desired outcomes.

Table 7: Communications Related Strategies
Strategy Action Items
Establish and maintain
communications
Strengthen and maintain communication among coordinating emergency event agencies. This could be achieved through systems such as the Public Information Emergency System and Emergency Satellite Communications.

Vulnerable population
communication plans
Identify vulnerable populations (see Vulnerable Populations subsection) that may require special assistance and develop population-specific communication plans to appropriate notify and support evacuations of these populations.

Traffic Control Center
Implement a Traffic Control Center to coordinate all evacuation activities. This center would have up to the minute reports on traffic patterns and can communicate directly with the broadcast media to let drivers know about roadway congestion and conditions and direct them to alternate routes.

Traffic counters/CCTV
cameras
Install counters and/or CCTV cameras to assess traffic flow, volume of vehicles evacuating, and monitor incidents.

Highway Advisory Radio Develop communication plan to provide timely traffic and travel condition information to the public

October 10, 2022 Page 21
City of Hayward Evacuation Analysis Methodology, Results, and Considerations Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

Vulnerable Populations
This section identifies strategies specifically for evacuation of vulnerable populations8. The City can use demographic data and U.S. Census data to identify vulnerable population locations and communities. City staff and emergency response teams may work with specialized organizations such as hospitals, medical associations, public service organizations, public health staff, and other providers or community groups to identify and locate relevant population segments and the types of assistance needed. Table 8 outlines considerations by need.

Table 8: Additional Steps for Evacuation of Vulnerable Populations Special Need Action Items/Considerations
Visually impaired
May be reluctant to leave familiar surroundings when the request for evacuation comes from a stranger. People who are blind or partially sighted may have to depend on their guide dogs and/or others to lead them to safety.

Hearing impaired May need to make special arrangements to receive evacuation warnings.

Include visual aids such as pictures or maps to reinforce key messages Mobility impaired May need special assistance such as paratransit. Partner with neighboring cities/private/non-profit agencies to provide adequate paratransit services People without vehicles Emphasize the importance of carpooling with neighbors or other community members. Provide information on transit routes and transit stops Non-English-speaking
persons
Provide bilingual or multilingual materials to support communication with non- English speaking populations during evacuation.

People with medical
conditions
Communicate in advance the location and availability of hospitals or facilities with emergency/life-sustaining medical equipment such as a dialysis machine Unhoused (Homeless)
population
Arrange for food, shelter, and transportation for unhoused (homeless) population. Offer age-appropriate emergency and evacuation information to homeless children.

8 Using Highways for No-Notice Evacuations: Five Planning Considerations, FHWA, Accessed August 2022.

October 10, 2022 Page 22
City of Hayward Evacuation Analysis Methodology, Results, and Considerations Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

Public Education
This section discusses the information that will be most beneficial in helping the general public preparing in advance of an evacuation. The public education process by the City should consider covering the following topics:

Table 9 Strategies for Public Education
Strategy Action Items
Meaning of different
types of evacuation
orders
Educate people of the California Standard Statewide Evacuation Terminology such as an Evacuation Order, Evacuation warning, Shelter in Place, Evacuation Order(s) Lifted, Hard Closure, Soft Closure, Resident Only Closure Method of
communicating
evacuation orders to
the public
Tools to communicate evacuation orders include in-person events (briefings and public meetings), print media(newspapers), broadcast media (television and radio), mobiles, internet, and social media.

The most appropriate and effective communication tool is one that reaches the target audience including people with special needs, gets timely information to the audience, delivers message reliably, and can be accessed within resource limitations
Provide information on
preparations to
conduct in advance
Encourage the creation of emergency evacuation checklists for residents which should include
• Emergency ‘go’ kit with water, non-perishable food items, first aid kit and prescription medicines
• Cellphone, battery powered radio and flashlights
• Special items for infants, elderly, or persons with disabilities • Pet supplies
• Family and emergency contact information
• Credit cards and cash
Creating and
educating on
Evacuation Maps
• Create static and interactive maps for the audience to know their evacuation zone, nearby emergency shelters and plan evacuation routes • Conduct public affairs campaign/events to provide information on understanding and using the evacuation maps
• Highlight ADA accessible emergency public shelters and shelters closer to hospitals on the evacuation maps
• Make sure the public knows outdoor assembly areas or public meeting points or temporary refuge areas in the neighborhood
Provide information on
available
transportation options,
including for
vulnerable populations
• Create maps showing emergency evacuation bus routes and bus stops • Establish a buddy system by assigning 2 or more neighbors to assist a person with disability during evacuation
Provide information on
evacuation shelters
and support services
offered during
evacuation
• Educate the public on the facilities available/to be expected from an emergency public shelter
• Educate the individuals/families who choose not to evacuate on the support services that might/might not be available during the disaster October 10, 2022 Page 23
City of Hayward Evacuation Analysis Methodology, Results, and Considerations Kittelson & Associates, Inc.

Resource Management
Evacuations are extremely resource-intensive events that require significant personnel, facilities, and equipment to implement successfully. Table 10 shows the strategies and action items for resource management.

Table 10 Strategies for Resource Management
Strategy Action Items
Clarity on staff
personnel’s roles and
expertise available
• Identify the public authority, e.g., city’s emergency personnel, authorized to issue evacuation orders
• Train staff personnel on their roles and responsibilities during an evacuation • Cross-train key individuals and develop strategies to backfill their roles Facilities available • Conduct evacuation drills with Traffic Control Center on the implementation of operating procedures, monitoring traffic congestion, coordination with other local agencies and infrastructure surveillance like maintaining emergency access or evacuation routes
• Work with hospitals in the city to conduct a Hazard Vulnerability Analysis (HVA) which includes studying issues related but not limited to:
o Types and volumes of supplies on hand/will they meet the need? o Staff availability
o Availability of alternate sources for critical supplies/ services • Ensure gas stations keep more fuel in reserve for evacuations Communication
systems
• Several communication tools such as landlines, cell phones, two-way radio, and internet/email/social media can be used during an evacuation • Emergency plans by wireless providers do not always include backup power for cell towers
• Landlines and two-way radio can thus be reliable and operate without external power supplies or communications infrastructure that cell phones rely on
Vehicles/transports • Make separate transportation plans for evacuating schools, colleges, nursing homes, hospitals, and assisted-living communities • Determine mass transit resources or other modes of transportation (air, rail, water/boat) as appropriate to the incident
• Review the transportation options and corridors for public transit in the areas at risk and identify possible alternative options • Estimate available personnel and equipment such as drivers, transit vehicles, tow-trucks, heavy equipment, traffic cones, channeling devices, static signs, etc., and fill the resource gaps where necessary Evacuation
management
exercises
• Conduct evacuation management exercises to prepare for evacuation events and inform resource needs.

The City should review these potential strategies and conduct a needs assessment to identify what resources they have available as well as what resources they will need to perform their allotted roles, the quantity of resource required, when will the resource be required, the capability and limitations of a resource, and the cost of procuring or having the resource available. If critical resource gaps are identified, the City is recommended to work with other evacuation entities to determine additional resources and October 10, 2022 Page 24
City of Hayward Evacuation Analysis Methodology, Results, and Considerations Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
needs. The City may also work with private sector to expand the resource base. Private service companies such as ambulance operators, and towing companies can provide additional assets during evacuation.

These companies can clarify what is expected of them during a potential evacuation event to ensure their services are available, when needed.

NEXT STEPS
This memorandum describes the results of the evacuation analysis as well as evacuation planning considerations and strategies to help improve the capacity and resilience of the City’s roadway network to support future evacuation events. This information will be used to frame supportive policies for the Safety Element update. These strategies and policies can be used to identify potential evacuation resiliency improvements throughout the City.

General Plan
Policy Document Environmental Justice
September 2023 Page | 3-1
POLICY DOCUMENT : PART 3

ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE

ELEMENT
Hi
storically, negative environmental impacts have been shown to disproportionately affect marginalized populations, including racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic minorities. As a result of these environmental impacts, marginalized populations tend to have poorer health and safety outcomes relative to the broader population. The various environmental impacts that tend to affect marginalized populations include but are not limited to increased exposure to pollutants, increased proximity to contaminated facilities/structures, and decreased access to public resources relative to other communities. These environmental impacts are directly linked to one another and thus can result in a compounded environmental burden on certain populations.

Environmental justice is a concept focused on addressing the systemic causes of the unequal environmental burden placed on disadvantaged communities, especially minority and low -income populations. In California, the Planning for Healthy Communities Act of 2016 (Senate Bill 1000) was established to address the role of environmental justice in local and regional planning practice.

Environmental justice regulations in California are aimed at improving the health and safety of disadvantaged communities through effective planning and policy decisions.

California law defines “environmental justice” as the fair treatment of people of all races, cultures, and incomes with respect to the development, adoption, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies (Government Code Section 65040.12, subd. (e)).

Through Senate Bill 1000, jurisdictions are now required to identify “disadvantaged communities” within their planning area and incorporate environmental justice policies and programs into their general plans. As described in the following Element, none of the 37 census tracts within Hayward meet the state definition of a “disadvantaged community” however there are neighborhoods that have measurable impacts with regard to population and pollution burdens, which can be addressed through this Element.

The City of Hayward is committed to promoting environmental justice through the effective implementation of this Environmental Justice Element. The Environmental Justice Element contains a comprehensive set of goals and policies aimed at increasing the rol e and influence of historically marginalized populations within their communities and reducing their exposure to environmental and

ATTACHMENT XI
General Plan
City of Hayward Policy Document

Page | 3-2 September 2023
health hazards. The goals and policies in this plan are centered around six focus areas. These focus areas are areas identified by the California Government Code Section 65302(h) as policy topics necessary for reducing the unique or compounded health risks in disadvantaged communities. The six focus areas are as follows:

Pollution Exposure and Air Quality
Public Facilities
Safe and Sanitary Homes
Physical Activity and Public Health
Food Access
Civic and Community Engagement
The Environmental Justice Element is divided into three sections. The first section is a summary of the public participation opportunities included as part of the Element development process. The second section presents the methodology used to identify disproportionally impacted communities in Hayward. The third section outlines environmental justice goals and policies and provides a summary of the baseline environmental conditions associated with each goal. Each section also identifies other General Plan Element policies and programs that address environmental justice within the focus area (see inset for description of other General Plan Elements). The goals, policies, and programs describe how the City of Hayward will incorporate environmental justice into decision making and support positive outcomes for affected residents.

To establish an understanding of the baseline conditions of environmental impacts in Hayward, a detailed technical analysis was performed. This technical assessment is known as the Environmental Justice Technical Report and can be found in Appendix A of this document.

General Plan
City of Hayward Policy Document

September 2023 Page | 3-3
Other General Plan Elements

Due to the broad and interdisciplinary nature of this topic, it is essential to note that several Elements of the General Plan contain goals, polices and programs related to community health, environmental health, equitable access to resources, parks, housing and transportation options, and community safety among other topics addressed in this Environmental Justice Element. Additionally, most of the Elements contain and support sustainability measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions outlined in the City’s Climate Action Plan (CAP) which is not a standalone General Plan Element but includes goals, policies and programs that are infused throughout the General Plan.

Natural Resources Element. The Natural Resources Element establishes goals and policies to protect and enhance the natural resources within the Hayward Planning Area. The goals and policies address a variety of topics, including biological resources, air quality and greenhouse gas reduction, open space, energy resources and efficiency, mineral resources, hydrology and water quality, water conservation, paleontological resources, and scenic resources. A number of goals and polices also serve as Climate Action Plan actions, which are designed to reduce local greenhouse gas emissions.

Mobility Element. The Mobility Element establishes goals and policies to improve the mobility of people and goods within and through the city of Hayward. Rather than focusing on automobile transportation, the Mobility Element seeks to create a balanced transportation network that supports and encourages walking, bicycling, and transit ridership. The goals and policies address a variety of topics, including multimodal transportation, regional coordination, complete streets, local circulation, pedestrian facilities, bikeways, public transit, transportation demand management, parking, aviation, goods movement, and transportation funding. A number of the goals and policies also serve as Climate Action Plan actions, which are designed to reduce local greenhouse gas emissions.

Hazards (Safety) Element. The Hazards Element establishes goals and policies to protect life and minimize property damage during future disasters and emergencies. The goals and policies address regional hazards mitigation, seismic and geologic hazards, flood hazards, rising sea levels, wildland wildfires, hazardous materials, airport hazards, and noise.

Health & Quality of Life. The focus of the Community Health and Quality of Life Element is to foster the health and well-being of all Hayward residents. The Element contains goals and policies related to a variety of topics, including active living, access to healthy food, health care access, safe and cohesive neighborhoods, aging in place, environmental health, and parks, recreation, and open space.

Community Safety. The Community Safety Element contains goals and policies that focus on crime prevention, police protection services, fire prevention, fire and emergency medical services, and disaster preparedness, response, and recovery. The goals and policies recognize that the Police Department and Fire Department are not solely responsible for the safety of Hayward. Rather, the City recognizes that community safety is the responsibility of all members of the Hayward community and that partnerships and collaboration between the City, residents, businesses, and neighborhood and community organizations are key factors to improving the safety and well-being of the community.

Housing Element. The purpose of the Housing Element is to achieve an adequate supply of decent, safe, and affordable housing for Hayward’s existing and future workforce, residents, and special needs populations. Housing Element law is designed to ensure that low-income families are not excluded from opportunities in all communities and to promote economic and environmental sustainability throughout the region. The Housing Element strives to conserve the city’s existing housing stock, while providing opportunities for new housing for all economic segments of the community.

General Plan
City of Hayward Policy Document

Page | 3-4 September 2023
Public Participation
The goals, policies and programs in this Element
were informed by public feedback solicited during
two virtual community workshops Information
about the Environmental Justice Element was also
provided through public engagement efforts
associated with the Housing Element and Climate
Action Plan , including mobile gallery pop -up
events, stakeholder and community meetings, and
interviews conducted by California State University
East Bay and Chabot Community College students.

Please see Appendix 1 of the Housing Element
Update and the Climate Action Plan for additional
details.

Community Workshops
The first environmental justice virtual community
workshop was held in February 2022. The meeting
was hosted over the Zoom video platform and a
recording was uploaded to the City’s official
YouTube page. Simultaneous Spanish -translation
was provided, and Spanish-language questions and
comments were translated in real -time at the
workshop.

During the workshop, City Staff and consultants
presented the key findings from the Environmental
Justice Technical Report ( Appendix A). Workshop
attendees were asked to identify key issues and
priorities in Hayward related to various
environmental justice topics. Topic s addressed
included the six key focus areas for environmental
justice identified within Senate Bill 1000, including
but not limited to: Safe and Sanitary Homes,
Pollution Exposure, and Civic Engagement.

Workshop attendees were asked to input their
feedback onto virtual mural boards using digital
sticky-notes. The resulting mural boards were then
used to develop policy themes.

The following topics were identified as priorities
from community members who participated in the
first workshop.
• Linguistic isolation impacts on the efficacy of
community engagement
• Improving engagement by advertising through
local schools
• Limited car access in Hayward community
impacts food access
• Inadequate nutritious food options within the
City
• Asthma screening to aid in community health
outcomes
• Medical costs as a barrier to healthcare access
• Concerns about rates of asthma in local
communities
• Perceived park safety impacts community use
of facilities

The second environmental justice virtual
community workshop was held over the Zoom
video platform in April 2022. City Staff and
consultants presented policy themes to be
addressed within the Environmental Justice
Element. Staff and consultants hosted an
interactive activity, where attendees were asked to
insert their feedback onto mural boards to express
their impression of the policy topics outlined within
the Policy Framework document. Feedback from

General Plan
City of Hayward Policy Document

September 2023 Page | 3-5
the second workshop was used to develop the
Draft Environmental Justice Element goals,
policies and programs.

The following topics were identified as priorities
from community members who participated in the
second workshop.
• Traffic
• Improved public transit
• Physical activity opportunities for seniors
• Non-English speaker accessibility
• Access to healthy locally grown food
• Active transportation
• Nutritional Education
Environmental Justice
Communities
Senate Bill 535 defines a “disadvantaged
community” as an area identified by the California
Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA)
pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 39711
or an area that is a low -income area that is
disproportionately affected by environmental
pollution and other hazards that can lead to
negative health effects, exposure, or environmental
degradation.