Agenda Packet — Hayward City Council, March 26, 2024 (part 1 of 4)

Tuesday, March 26, 2024
7:00 PM

CITY OF HAYWARD
Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
Council Chamber and Virtual Platform
City Council
Agenda
City Council Agenda March 26, 2024

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
NOTICE: The City Council will hold a hybrid meeting in the Council Chambers and virtually via Zoom.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
How to observe the Meeting:

1. Comcast TV Channel 15

2. Live stream https://hayward.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx

3. YouTube Live stream: https://www.youtube.com/user/cityofhayward How to submit written Public Comment:

1. Use eComment on the City's Meeting & Agenda Center webpage at:
https://hayward.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx. eComments are directly sent to the iLegislate application used by City Council and City staff. Comments received before 3:00 p.m. the day of the meeting will be exported into a report, distributed to the City Council and staff, and published on the City's Meeting & Agenda Center under Documents Received After Published Agenda.

2. Send an email to [email protected] by 3:00 p.m. the day of the meeting. Please identify the Agenda Item Number in the subject line of your email. Emails will be compiled into one file, distributed to the City Council and staff, and published on the City's Meeting & Agenda Center under Documents Received After Published Agenda. Documents received after 3:00 p.m. through the adjournment of the meeting will be included as part of the meeting record and published the following day.

How to provide live Public Comment during the City Council Meeting:

Participate in the Council Chambers or click link below to join the meeting:
https://hayward.zoom.us/j/84509745980?
pwd=tGfK_SymXsKUnfLfW_cZpjZUjH3W34d-SDA.Q3zmKZ_q-xQsTw4t Meeting ID: 845 0974 5980
Password: CC3/26@7pm
or
Dial: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 646 931 3860
Meeting ID: 845 0974 5980
Password: 0599314282
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Salinas
Pledge of Allegiance: Council Member Goldstein
AB 2449 TELECONFERENCE NOTIFICATIONS AND CONSIDERATION

ROLL CALL
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 2 Tuesday, March 26, 2024
City Council Agenda March 26, 2024

CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENT

PUBLIC COMMENTS
The Public Comments section provides an opportunity to address the City Council on items not listed on the agenda or Informational Staff Presentation items. The Council welcomes comments and requests that speakers present their remarks in a respectful manner, within established time limits, and focus on issues which directly affect the City or are within the jurisdiction of the City. As the Council is prohibited by State law from discussing items not listed on the agenda, items will be taken under consideration and may be referred to staff. The City Council welcomes comments, including criticism, about the policies, procedures, programs, or services of the City, or of the acts or omissions of the City Council. Speakers shall not use threatening, profane, or abusive language which disrupts, disturbs, or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of a City Council. The City is committed to maintaining a workplace free of unlawful harassment and is mindful that City staff regularly attend Council meetings. Discriminatory statements or conduct that is hostile, intimidating, oppressive, or abusive – are per se disruptive to a meeting and will not be tolerated.

CITY MANAGER’S COMMENTS
An oral report from the City Manager on upcoming activities, events, or other items of general interest to Council and the Public.

ACTION ITEMS
The Council will permit comment as each item is called for the Consent Calendar, Public Hearings, and Legislative Business. In the case of the Consent Calendar, a specific item will need to be pulled by a Council Member in order for the Council to discuss the item or to permit public comment on the item. Please notify the City Clerk any time before the Consent Calendar is voted on by Council if you wish to speak on a Consent Item.

CONSENT
Approve the Minutes of the City Council Meeting on March 12, 2024

1. MIN 24-039
Attachments: Attachment I Draft Minutes of 3/12/2024
Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Project Initiation Document for the SR-92/Whitesell Interchange Project, Project No. 05334

2. CONS 24-134
Attachments: Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
Attachment III Draft PID Document
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 3 Tuesday, March 26, 2024
City Council Agenda March 26, 2024
Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Amend the Agreement with Bay Area Community Services (BACS) for
Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Hayward Navigation Center Operations for an Amount Not-to-Exceed $2,500,894

3. CONS 24-139
Attachments: Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for Construction Management for the Water Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF) Improvements - Phase II Project, Project Nos. 07749, 07760 and 07786, in an Amount Not-to-Exceed
$949,625

4. CONS 24-142
Attachments: Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
Adopt a Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Call for Bids for the Alves Street and Leighton Street Drainage Improvements, Project No. 07794

5. CONS 24-149
Attachments: Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
Attachment III Location Map
Adopt a Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications for the Purchase of Continuous Deflective Separator (CDS) Units, and Calling for Bids for a Trash Capture Device Installation on Arf Avenue, Project No. 07746

6. CONS 24-151
Attachments: Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
Adopt a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the City of Hayward Salary Plan for Fiscal Year 2024

7. CONS 24-154
Attachments: Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
Attachment III FY 2024 Salary Plan
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 4 Tuesday, March 26, 2024
City Council Agenda March 26, 2024
Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement between the City of Hayward and Maze & Associates for Audit and Financial Services
Not-to-Exceed $389,807

8. CONS 24-159
Attachments: Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
Adopt a Resolution Accepting and Filing the Annual
Comprehensive Financial Report for the Year Ended June 30, 2023; and of the Memorandum on Internal Control and
Required Communications

9. CONS 24-162
Attachments: Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
Attachment III FY 2023 ACFR

WORK SESSION
Work Session items are non-action items. Although the Council may discuss or direct staff to follow up on these items, no formal action will be taken. Any formal action will be placed on the agenda at a subsequent meeting in the action sections of the agenda.

Russell City Reparative Justice Project: Work Session to Receive the Recommendations from the Russell City Reparative Justice Project Steering Committee (Report from Assistant City Manager Youngblood)

10. WS 24-005
Attachments: Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II List of 26 Recommendations
Attachment III Recommendation Ranking Survey Results
Attachment IV RCRJP Steering Committee Presentation
Attachment V Reclaiming Russell City Report
Attachment VI Reclaiming Russell City PowerPoint
Attachment VII Redeveloping Russell City Report
Attachment VIII Reporter's Transcript of 1963 Public Hearings Attachment IX View Points from RCRJP Steering Committee CITY OF HAYWARD Page 5 Tuesday, March 26, 2024
City Council Agenda March 26, 2024

PUBLIC HEARING
Streamlined Affordable Housing Overlay District: Introduction of an Ordinance and Adoption of a Resolution for City-Initiated Zoning Text and Map Amendments to Chapter 1, Article 10 (Planning, Zoning and Subdivisions) of the Hayward Municipal Code to Establish an Affordable Housing Overlay District to Allow Ministerial Design Review of New Residential
Development Subject to Minimum Affordability Criteria and to Rezone Three Properties Subject to the Overlay District as Required by the 6th Cycle Housing Element (Report from
Director of Development Services Buizer)

11. PH 24-014
Attachments: Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
Attachment III Ordinance
Attachment III Exhibit A Streamlined Overlay District
Attachment III Exhibit B Housing Overlay District Maps
Attachment IV Hayward GP Final Addendum

COUNCIL REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
Council Members can provide oral reports on attendance at intergovernmental agency meetings, conferences, seminars, or other Council events to comply with AB 1234 requirements (reimbursable expenses for official activities).

COUNCIL REFFERAL
Council Members may bring forward a Council Referral Memorandum (Memo) on any topic to be considered by the entire Council. The intent of this Council Referrals section of the agenda is to provide an orderly means through which an individual Council Member can raise an issue for discussion and possible direction by the Council to the appropriate Council Appointed Officers for action by the applicable City staff.

ADJOURNMENT
NEXT MEETING, April 2, 2024, 7:00 PM

PUBLIC COMMENT RULES
Any member of the public desiring to address the Council shall limit their comments to three (3) minutes unless less or further time has been granted by the Presiding Officer or in accordance with the section under Public Hearings. The Presiding Officer has the discretion to shorten or lengthen the maximum time members may speak. Speakers will be asked for their name before speaking and are expected to honor the allotted time.

CITY OF HAYWARD Page 6 Tuesday, March 26, 2024
City Council Agenda March 26, 2024

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE
That if you file a lawsuit challenging any final decision on any public hearing or legislative business item listed in this agenda, the issues in the lawsuit may be limited to the issues that were raised at the City's public hearing or presented in writing to the City Clerk at or before the public hearing.

PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE
That the City Council adopted Resolution No. 87-181 C.S., which imposes the 90-day deadline set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.6 for filing of any lawsuit challenging final action on an agenda item which is subject to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5. ***Materials related to an item on the agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office, City Hall, 777 B Street, 4th Floor, Hayward, during normal business hours. An online version of this agenda and staff reports are available on the City’s website. Written comments submitted to the Council in connection with agenda items will be posted on the City’s website. All Council Meetings are broadcast simultaneously on the City website, Cable Channel 15 - KHRT, and YouTube. ***
Assistance will be provided to those requiring accommodations for disabilities in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Interested persons must request the accommodation at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting by contacting the City Clerk at (510) 583-4400 or [email protected].

Assistance will be provided to those requiring language assistance. To ensure that interpreters are available at the meeting, interested persons must request the accommodation at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting by contacting the City Clerk at (510) 583-4400.

CITY OF HAYWARD Page 7 Tuesday, March 26, 2024
CITY OF HAYWARD Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
File #: MIN 24-039
DATE: March 26, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Clerk

SUBJECT
Approve the Minutes of the City Council Meeting on March 12, 2024

RECOMMENDATION
That the Council approves the City Council meeting minutes of March 12, 2024.

SUMMARY
The City Council held a meeting on March 12, 2024.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I Draft Minutes of March 12, 2024
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 1 of 1 Printed on 3/22/2024
powered by Legistar™

SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
777 B Street, Hayward, CA 94541
Council Chambers
https://hayward.zoom.us/j/83639328548?pwd=ZUdDZE5lM2R1dHNFbVJoVXJBckdmQT09 Tuesday, March 12, 2024, 7:00 p.m.

The Special City Council meeting was called to order by Mayor Salinas at 7:03 p.m. The City Council held a meeting in the Council Chambers.

Pledge of Allegiance: Council Member Zermeño

Present: COUNCIL MEMBERS Andrews, Bonilla Jr., Goldstein, Roche, Syrop, Zermeño MAYOR Salinas

Absent: None

CLOSED SESSION
The City Council convened in closed session on March 12, 2024, at 5:30 p.m., with all members present and no public speakers, regarding two items: 1) annual performance evaluation pursuant to Government Code section 54957 for the City Clerk; and 2) conference with legal counsel pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9 (d)(2) regarding one anticipated litigation matter. City Attorney Lawson indicated the Council did not take reportable action related to both items. The closed session adjourned at 6:50 p.m.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were none.

CITY MANAGER’S COMMENTS
City Manager McAdoo provided two Library announcements: 1) the library is seeking input for its new strategic plan through a community input survey until March 17, 2024; and 2) Hayward is inviting residents aged eighteen or older to apply for its next Poet Laureate by March 22, 2024. Additional information about both opportunities can be found on the library’s website.

CONSENT

1. Approve the Minutes of the City Council Meeting on February 20, 2024 MIN 24-034 It was moved by Council Member Andrews, seconded by Council Member Goldstein, and carried by the following roll call vote, to adopt the City Council meeting minutes of February 20, 2024.

2. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Accept and Appropriate Up To $150,000 in Donations ($50,000 or Less Individually) from Donor Organizations and Individuals to Support Library Services and Programs Through the End of FY 26, Superseding Resolution No. 23-006 CONS 24-076
2 | M a r c h 12 , 2 0 2 4
Staff report submitted by Library Services Director Addleman, dated March 12, 2024, was filed.

It was moved by Council MemberAndrews, seconded by Council MemberGoldstein, and carried by the following roll call vote, to adopt the resolution.

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS Andrews, Bonilla Jr., Goldstein, Roche, Syrop, Zermeño
MAYOR Salinas
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Resolution 24-040 “Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Accept and Appropriate Up to $150,000 in Donations to Support Library Services and Programs FY 24-26 and Supersede
Resolution No. 23- 006”

3. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Funding Agreement, Accept $500,000 in USDA Urban and Community Forestry Grant Funds, Appropriate $250,000 to Project 07797 for a Citywide Tree Condition Assessment, Inventory, and Tree ManagementSoftware and $250,000 to Project 07796 for Hazardous Tree Removals and Replacements, Transfer and Appropriate $250,000 from the General Fund to Capital Fund 405 for Project 07797, and Transfer and Appropriate $250,000 from Project 05102 to Project 07796 Over Five Years CONS 24-106
Staff report submitted by Maintenance Services Director Rullman, dated March 12, 2024, was filed.

It was moved by Council Member Andrews, seconded by Council Member Goldstein, and carried by the following roll call vote, to adopt the resolution.

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS Andrews, Bonilla Jr., Goldstein, Roche, Syrop, Zermeño
MAYOR Salinas
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Resolution 24-041 “Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Funding Agreement, Accept $500,000 in USDA Urban and Community Forestry Grant Funds, Appropriate $250,000 to Project 07797 for a Citywide Tree Condition Assessment, Inventory, and Tree Management Software and $250,000 to Project 07796 for Hazardous Tree Removals and Replacements, Transfer and Appropriate $250,000 from the General Fund to

SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
777 B Street, Hayward, CA 94541
Council Chambers
https://hayward.zoom.us/j/83639328548?pwd=ZUdDZE5lM2R1dHNFbVJoVXJBckdmQT09 Tuesday, March 12, 2024, 7:00 p.m.

Capital Fund 405 for Project 07797, and Transfer and Appropriate $250,000 from Project 05102 to Project 07796 Over Five Years”

4. Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Easement Deeds to Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Construct, Reconstruct, Maintain, Inspect, and Access Underground Electric, Communication and Gas Facilities for Public Utility Purposes on and Under a Portion of the City’s Land for La Vista Park CONS 24-113 Staff report submitted by Public Works Director Ameri, dated March 12, 2024, was filed.

It was moved by Council Member Andrews, seconded by Council Member Goldstein, and carried by the following roll call vote, to adopt the resolution.

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS Andrews, Bonilla Jr., Goldstein, Roche, Syrop, Zermeño
MAYOR Salinas
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Resolution 24-042 “Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Two EasementDeeds to Pacific Gas and Electric Company for Extension of Underground Public Utility Facilities Across a Portion of the City’s Proposed La Vista Park Property Along Tennyson Road”

SPECIAL JOINT WORK SESSION OF CITY COUNCIL AND

HAYWARD AREA RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT (HARD) BOARD OF DIRECTORS HARD Board of Directors Rick Hatcher, Paul Hodges, and Peter Rosen participated in the work session in person.

HARD Director Sara Lamnin participated in the work session virtually via Zoom under the “just cause” provisions of AB 2449, Government Code sections 54953(f)(2)(A)(i) and 54953(j)(2)(A).
4 | M a r c h 12 , 2 0 2 4

WORK SESSION

1. Joint Work Session with Hayward City Council and Hayward Area Recreation and Park District Board of Directors WS 24-004
Staff report submitted by General Manager Wheeler and City Manager McAdoo, dated March 12, 2024, was filed.

City Manager McAdoo highlighted the collaboration between the City and Hayward Area Recreation and Park District (HARD) in bringing an annual report to Council as provided in the master lease agreement with HARD for operating the City’s park system; and provided an overview of the City’s innovation programs and key accomplishments in partnership with HARD over the past year related to homeless response, development trends, affordable housing, capital projects, People’s Budget projects, and Faircliff response.

HARD General Manager Wheeler highlighted the advancements made by the recreation and park service provided in the past few years. Director of Recreation, Arts and Community Services Adriane Lee Bird provided a comprehensive HARD year-end review, discussed the 2023 Health Equity initiative, and accessibility to programming. Management Analyst Thomas Omolo presented an overview of park standards and usage data, park usage trends pre- and post-pandemic and the correlation between bond investments and increased park usage.

Assistant to the General Manager/Public Information Officer Nicole Espinoza Roa provided insights into the Public Safety Department's activities within parks.

Mayor Salinas opened the public comment section at 7:34 p.m.

Carlos Archuleta expressed concern about HARD’s high fees and inadequate maintenance of baseball fields, urged HARD to prioritize affordable sports leagues over expensive classes, and emphasized the importance of accessible recreational opportunities for children.

Sandra Archuleta expressed dissatisfaction with HARD for neglecting field maintenance, hindering youth activities, and imposing excessive fees; and urged HARD to prioritize community service.

Mayor Salinas closed the public comment section at 7:40 p.m.

Discussion ensued among members of the City Council, HARD Board of Directors, and their staffs and the following clarifications were made: HARD is the largest park and recreation district in California in terms of serving population; free scholarships or up to 75 percent in program reduction costs and free programing through Health and Equity initiatives are available; HARD adopted park maintenance standards which are evaluated through scores; there is a number of employed staff and rangers and staffing protocols; camping in parks and collaboration in addressing homelessness; Mia's Dream is part of Tennyson Park, leading to a substantial increase in visitors following playground improvements; the Weekes Park working group focuses on ongoing support and collaboration to address park-related issues, particularly

SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
777 B Street, Hayward, CA 94541
Council Chambers
https://hayward.zoom.us/j/83639328548?pwd=ZUdDZE5lM2R1dHNFbVJoVXJBckdmQT09 Tuesday, March 12, 2024, 7:00 p.m.
those involving the homeless population; HARD’s website provides information about park projects, updates and improvements; there are various low-cost and free family and teenoriented programs that were launched recently; graffiti is a significant factor affecting park ratings and community partnerships would be vital in addressing the issue effectively; there are challenges of managing HARD's budget and staffing constraints while striving to enhance park services; there are seven designated dog parks and one is being developed in the Cannery Park; and there is positive impact of park maintenance standards and data analysis in guiding resource allocation and addressing deficits.

Members of the City Council and HARD Board of Directors provided the following recommendations: hold a joint session on La Vista Park project instead of separate discussions; have joint discussions about matters that overlap both agencies; consider a potential partnership with StopWaste; evaluate the need for soccer fields and take into account their maintenance; address maintenance of baseball fields based on comments received; consider adding a choir to the Douglas Morrison Theatre; seek further communications with Little League associations about fields; improve communication strategies to ensure that information on HARD’s website about available scholarships and programs, as well as park events, is easily accessible to the public; explore the feasibility to use scholarships to help subsidize leagues; track topics of concerns expressed during the meeting and provide an update in the next annual report; explore opportunities for revenue generation through initiatives such as concessions or vendor partnerships in parks where feasible; strengthen partnerships with community groups, local organizations and places of worship to address park issues collaboratively; continue and expand volunteer programs, like the Volunteers in Parks initiative; consider improving bike infrastructure around parks through existing funding sources; explore community land trusts as a model for managing public lands; continue the valuable partnerships with organizations such as Hayward Area Shoreline Planning Agency and the Hayward Local Agencies Committee; continue to explore public art in newly renovated parks as placemaking features; and review and assess park usage data, community feedback, and previous recommendations to inform future decision-making and prioritize areas for improvement.

Public members were encouraged to attend HARD public meetings to share their experiences and collaborate with staff to find potential resolutions.

Members of the City Council and HARD Board of Directors thanked staff from the respective agencies for the presentations; praised HARD's efforts at Weekes Park and improvements at Palma Ceia Park, the assistance provided through scholarships and Health Equity initiatives, the support of People’s Budget’s projects, the fees for non-profit and community partners; commended the Mobile Rec program for its positive impact on the community; and appreciated the overall coordination of resources.

Mayor Salinas took a recess at 8:32 p.m. and reconvened the Council meeting at 8:39 p.m. 6 | M a r c h 12 , 2 0 2 4

LEGISLATIVE BUSINESS

5. FY 2024 Mid-Year Budget Review: Adopt a Resolution Approving the FY 2024 Mid-Year Budget Amendments and Receive and Review the Five-Year General Fund Financial Model Update (Report from Finance Director Gonzales) LB 24-008 Staff report submitted by Finance Director Gonzales, dated March 12 2024, was filed.

Finance Director Gonzales provided a synopsis of the staff report and addressed six questions from community members: 1) the Mayor’s dinner expense is the one-time $8,000 in taxpayer funds allocated for the Mayors’ Conference which is a shared cost among the 15 cities in Alameda County; 2) the proposed $75,000 expense to educate residents on housing and community efforts was not being requested at the current meeting but could be discussed at a future meeting when ARPA (American Rescue Plan Act) funds are discussed; 3) Russell City Reparative Justice Project has been allotted at least $170,000 from the General Fund and the current budget review does not include additional funding, but the project is ongoing and there is a Council work session scheduled for March 26, 2024; 4) information gathered from polling and public input, funded by the $86,000, will need to be considered in developing ballot language; 5) regarding the divestment of funds, staff are in the process of transferring funds to a new investment account, and a report will be presented to Council Budget and Finance Committee and City Council; and 6) regarding the Hayward Animal Shelter funding, the reduction in the operating budget is offset by grant funding and community donations.

Discussion ensued among members of the City Council and City staff and the following clarification were made: loan expenditures are repaid in the same amount; transfers-out (related to Fleet Management and Facilities Management) cannot be included in Measure C Fund because they are for ongoing operating costs; a fund increase request for the Hayward Animal Shelter can occur during the annual budget process, if feasible; additional consulting services inspection fees and plan check for services ($500,000) typically increase as developments progress, with revenue from earlier years offsetting costs; transfer-out for security services are unrelated to the Fire Training Center and aimed at enhancing security at various municipal buildings; process for reallocating ARPA funds if unused; Capital Improvement Project expenditure adjustments primarily involved carryforward budgets from previous years; expenses to support downtown special events are related to staff support for these events; the $8.3 million related to operational expenses plus $9.6 million in appropriations related to authorized loans would be drawn from General Fund Reserves; increases in fleet fuel budget were made at mid-year based on actual usage; PG&E costs at Fire Station #6 Training Center did not include one-time costsfor solar panel installation; the $1.0 million for the Employee Home Loan Pilot Program could benefit loans of up to $150,000 each, based on individual requests; it is important to urge utility agencies to assist in expediting development projects to boost sales tax revenue; and it is important to explore ways to increase the $575,000 Economic Development Corporation loan repayment to get it paid sooner.

SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
777 B Street, Hayward, CA 94541
Council Chambers
https://hayward.zoom.us/j/83639328548?pwd=ZUdDZE5lM2R1dHNFbVJoVXJBckdmQT09 Tuesday, March 12, 2024, 7:00 p.m.

Council Member Andrews requested clarification on the PG&E costs related to the Fire Station's solar installation, inquiring about potential benefits such as power collection or reimbursements.

Mayor Salinas opened the public hearing at 9:26 p.m.

District 2 Alameda County Supervisor Márquez read into the record a letter dated March 11, 2024, addressed to Mayor Salinas and Council Members which expressed support for FY 2024 Mid-Year Amendment to appropriate $250,000 in Measure C funds to St. Rose Hospital for continued delivery of vital health care services to the community while hospital leadership works on long-term financial sustainability; and informed the Council of the Board of Supervisors' unanimous approval to leverage $11.6 million in funding toward St. Rose Hospital.

Mayor Salinas closed the public hearing at 9:29 p.m.

Mayor Salinas thanked his colleagues on the Council Budget and Finance Committee, Council Members Bonilla Jr., and Syrop, for the review of proposed Mid-Year budget amendments; and inquired about the total amount of funds allocated toward St. Rose Hospital, which staff would confirm.

Members of the City Council commended Supervisor Márquez for her support of St. Rose Hospital.

Council Member Bonilla Jr. supported the allocation towards St. Rose Hospital and made a motion to approve staff’s recommendation.

Council Member Syrop seconded the motion and shared his thoughts around the budget proposal by suggesting recommitting ARPA funds back into the General Fund while the City makes strategic financial decisions such as combining targeted programs or designing new programs.

Council Member Andrews supported the allocation toward St. Rose Hospital and its long-term sustainable financial plan; and urged the Council to assign funds toward the Together for Hayward eGift Card Program for being a successful program.

Council Member Roche supported the motion and allocation for St. Rose Hospital, expressed she looked forward to ARPA allocation conversations, and indicated that while she had expressed reservations about the $8.6 million loan for the theater, she remained optimistic about the project.

Council Member Zermeño shared he is a St. Rose Hospital Foundation member, and the Foundation helps raise funds to keep service delivery.
8 | M a r c h 12 , 2 0 2 4
Council Member Goldstein noted that St. Rose Hospital was vital to a sector of the community in need of health care services.

Mayor Salinas added that St. Rose Hospital was an important safety net hospital in the region.

It was moved by Council Member Bonilla Jr., seconded by Council Member Syrop, and carried by the following roll call vote, to approve the resolutions.

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS Andrews, Bonilla Jr., Goldstein, Roche, Syrop, Zermeño
MAYOR Salinas
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Resolution 24-043, “Resolution Amending Resolution 23-147 as Amended, the Budget Resolution for the City of Hayward
Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2024, Relating to an
Appropriation of Funds”

Resolution 24-044, “Resolution Amending Resolution 23-148, as Amended, the Budget Resolution for the City of Hayward Capital Improvement Projects for Fiscal Year 2024, Relating to an Appropriation of Funds”

COUNCIL REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
Council Member Syrop invited all to the exhibition "Art IS Education," organized in collaboration with Hayward Arts Council, City of Hayward, and Hayward Unified School District, on March 15, 2024, at the John O’Lague Galleria, Hayward City Hall.

Council Member Roche invited all to join the St. Patrick's Day Celtic Celebration presented by the Bay Philharmonic on March 17, 2024.

COUNCIL REFERRALS
There were none.

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Salinas adjourned the special City Council meeting at 9:46 p.m.

SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
777 B Street, Hayward, CA 94541
Council Chambers
https://hayward.zoom.us/j/83639328548?pwd=ZUdDZE5lM2R1dHNFbVJoVXJBckdmQT09 Tuesday, March 12, 2024, 7:00 p.m.

APPROVED
__________________________________________________________ Mark Salinas
Mayor, City of Hayward
ATTEST:
__________________________________________________________ Miriam Lens
City Clerk, City of Hayward
CITY OF HAYWARD Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
File #: CONS 24-134
DATE: March 26, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works

SUBJECT
Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Project Initiation Document for the SR92/Whitesell Interchange Project, Project No. 05334

RECOMMENDATION
That the Council adopts a resolution (Attachment II) authorizing the City Manager to sign the final Project Initiation Document (PID) for the SR-92/Whitesell Interchange Project on behalf of the City.

SUMMARY
The State Route-92 (SR-92)/Clawiter Road interchange is the last interchange on SR-92 just east of the San Mateo-Hayward Bridge crossing at the San Francisco Bay and approximately two miles west of the SR -92/Interstate-880 (I-880) interchange. The Project is located in the western portion of the City in an area that is generally built out and characterized primarily by industrial land uses.

The proposed SR-92/Whitesell Interchange Project would further enhance the local reliever route between SR-92 and I-880, and significantly improve access to and from the City’s industrial complexes, manufacturing sites, and office parks north and south of SR-92 and west of I-880. It would also improve bike and pedestrian connectivity across the interchange and operations of the interchange to further relieve congestion on SR-92, I-880 and major arterials in the area.

The purpose of the PID phase is to define the general scope of the environmental studies and engineering reports that will be necessary to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in the next phase of development, Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED). The preliminary alternatives developed in the PID will be further refined during the PA&ED phase through consultation with stakeholders and the public as required by CEQA and NEPA.

The City, in collaboration with Caltrans, is preparing the project’s Final PID which will require approval from both the City and Caltrans. Successful completion of the PID will allow the City to move forward with seeking funding for the next phase of project development.

CITY OF HAYWARD Page 1 of 2 Printed on 3/22/2024
powered by Legistar™
File #: CONS 24-134

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
Attachment III Draft PID Document
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 2 of 2 Printed on 3/22/2024
powered by Legistar™

Page 1 of 4 ends

DATE: March 26, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Project Initiation Document for the SR-92/Whitesell Interchange Project, Project No. 05334

SUMMARY
The State Route-92 (SR-92)/Clawiter Road interchange is the last interchange on SR-92 just east of the San Mateo-Hayward Bridge crossing at the San Francisco Bay and approximately two miles west of the SR-92/Interstate-880 (I-880) interchange. The Project is located in the western portion of the City in an area that is generally built out and characterized primarily by industrial land uses.

Page 2 of 4 ends

BACKGROUND
The Project is located just east of the San Mateo - Hayward Bridge crossing at the San Francisco Bay in the western portion of the City. This area is generally built out and characterized primarily by industrial land uses.

Hayward's industrial zones, manufacturing sites and office parks west of I-880 can use better truck access due to prolonged congestion periods on several major arterials, such as Winton Avenue, Hesperian Boulevard, Clawiter Road, Depot Road and the regional routes, such as I-880 and SR- 92, which is limiting economic development. The existing SR92/Clawiter interchange is deficient for existing traffic conditions because the existing overcrossing only provides for one lane in each direction and Clawiter/off-ramp intersections do not accommodate for left-turn storage at peak times. Also, there is a sidewalk only on one side, no provisions for bikes on the overcrossing, and the approaches on each side of the bridge provide no sidewalk or bike facilities.

The Project is the second phase of the “SR-92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange and Reliever Route Project” which would provide a local reliever route between SR-92 and I-880 to improve access to and from the industrial area north of SR-92 and west of I-880 and improve circulation and relieve congestion on SR-92, I-880 and major arterials in the area.

Phase 1, completed by the City in 2017, was comprised of local street modifications which included widening of West Winton Avenue at the Hesperian Boulevard intersection, signal phasing modifications, widening and extension of Whitesell Street between Depot Road and SR-92.

The Project has been on the City’s Identified Needs list for many years. It involves reconstruction of the SR-92/Clawiter Road interchange to create the SR-92/Whitesell Street interchange and provide consolidated access to Clawiter Road and the reliever route along Whitesell Street. The project would include improving the connectivity of bicycle and pedestrian facilities across SR-92. The upgraded interchange would further enhance the local reliever route between SR-92 and I-880, and significantly improve access to and from the City’s industrial complexes, manufacturing sites, and office parks north and south of SR92 and west of I-880.

On July 26, 2018, the Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC) approved $440,000 in Measure BB funding to advance the Planning and Scoping Phase of the SR-92 Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Project. On January 17, 20231, Council authorized a Professional Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc., for the Planning and Scoping Phase of the Project. As per Caltrans, the planning and scoping phase is known as the Project Initiation Document (PID) phase.

As part of the PID work, the City’s consultants developed a preliminary set of reasonable alternatives based on the project goals, existing deficiencies, and constraints of the project site. These alternatives were presented to the Council Infrastructure Committee (CIC) on June 28, 2023, to garner feedback and CIC comments have been incorporated into the development of the project.

1 https://hayward.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5996148&GUID=B0EE2898-A889-46D6-8D29-6AE5B7ACF865&Options=&Search=

Page 3 of 4 ends

DISCUSSION
The City, in cooperation with California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC) propose to upgrade the interchange under the SR-92/ Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project. The interchange is on the State Highway System and will follow Caltrans procedures, policies, and standards. The Project planning and scoping phase, or as per Caltrans terminology, Project Initiation Document (PID) phase, is funded by a combination of Alameda CTC Measure BB and local funds and was initiated in February 2023.

The project involves reconstruction of the SR-92/Clawiter Road interchange to create the SR-92/Whitesell Street interchange and provide consolidated access to Clawiter Road and the reliever route along Whitesell Street. This Project will improve access to and from SR92 for the industrial areas and office parks just west of I-880. This new overcrossing structure will provide up to four-through lanes, two in each direction, Class II bike lanes and sidewalks on both sides. This project will also relieve congestion on I-880 with these new connections on SR-92. Breakwater Avenue, the frontage road along the north side of SR-92, will need to be realigned or modified to accommodate the new westbound on and off ramps.

The City’s consultants have been working in collaboration with Caltrans to prepare the PID according to Caltrans guidelines. The Draft PID document, which has been reviewed by Caltrans, includes conceptual alternatives, preliminary project costs, and the project schedule (included as Attachment III). It is anticipated that the final PID document will be ready for signatures by the City and Caltrans in April 2024. Successful completion of the PID document will allow the City to move forward with seeking funding for the next phase of project development.

At the February 28, 20242, Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee (CI&AC) meeting, the City’s consultants presented key information from the PID document to the committee.

The CI&AC was generally supportive of the project and approved the recommendation to bring this item to Council for consideration.

ECONOMIC IMPACT
This item has no direct economic impact. However, the Project will provide interchange improvements and new local road connections. These improvements will significantly

2 https://hayward.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=6555167&GUID=86FA939E-167C-4FC3-ABFF-D1F3780D9A0D&Options=&Search=

Page 4 of 4 ends

improve access to the City’s industrial area and make the overall transportation system more efficient.

FISCAL IMPACT
Alameda CTC provided $440,000 in Measure BB funding to advance the Planning and Scoping Phase of the SR-92 Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project.

STRATEGIC ROADMAP
This agenda item supports the Strategic Priority of Invest in Infrastructure. This item is not specifically related to a named project identified in the Strategic Roadmap but is closely related to the Invest in Multi-Modal Transportation category of projects because this project, when constructed, will include bicycle and pedestrian improvements to facilitate the local use of active transportation.

SUSTAINABILITY FEATURES
There are no sustainability features associated with this item. The project, when constructed, will include bicycle and pedestrian improvements to facilitate the local use of active transportation.

PUBLIC CONTACT
This phase of the project will include initial stakeholder outreach to help inform the development of a reasonable range of conceptual alternatives. The subsequent PA&ED phase of the project will include broader public outreach effort required for CEQA environmental review.

NEXT STEPS
If the Council approves, the City Manager will sign the Final PID on behalf of the City to complete the PID phase.

Prepared by: Byron Tang, Senior Transportation Engineer Kathy Garcia, Deputy Director of Public Works
Recommended by: Alex Ameri, Director of Public Works
Approved by:
_______________________________________
Kelly McAdoo, City Manager

ATTACHMENT II

Page 1 of 2 ends

HAYWARD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 24-
Introduced by Council Member

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE
PROJECT INITIATION DOCUMENT FOR THE SR-92/WHITESELL
INTERCHANGE PROJECT, PROJECT NO. 05334
WHEREAS, the SR-92/Whitesell Interchange Project will upgrade the existing SR92/Clawiter interchange to provide multimodal access to the City’s industrial complexes, manufacturing sites, and office parks, while relieving congestion on SR-92, I-880, and major arterials in the area; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Scoping Phase of the Project will provide preliminary engineering, initial cost estimates and planning level environmental review; and WHEREAS, the first step of the Planning and Scoping Phase is to produce a Project Initiation Document; and
WHEREAS, the City, in collaboration with Caltrans, is preparing the project’s final Project Initiation Document, which will require approval from both the City and Caltrans; and
WHEREAS, successful completion of the Project Initiation Document will allow the City to seek funding and for the Project Approval and Environmental Documentation phase of the Project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the Project Initiation Document for the SR-92/Whitesell Interchange Project, Project No. 05334, in a form approved by the City Attorney.

ATTACHMENT II

Page 2 of 2 ends

IN COUNCIL, HAYWARD, CALIFORNIA , 2024
ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MAYOR:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

ATTEST:

City Clerk of the City of Hayward
City Attorney of the City of Hayward
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 1 Project Study Report-Project Development Support
(PSR-PDS)
To
Request Approval for a Locally Funded Project to
Proceed to Project Approval and Environmental
Document (PA&ED) Phase
On Route State Route 92
Between 0.5 miles west of the Clawiter Road overcrossing And 0.4 miles east of the Clawiter Road overcrossing
APPROVAL RECOMMENDED:
________________________________________________
Alex Ameri, Director of Public Works
City of Hayward
Project Sponsor, Accepts risks identified in this
PSR-PDS and attached risk register
APPROVAL RECOMMENDED:
________________________________________________
Celia McCuaig, Acting Deputy District Director
Transportation Planning and Local Assistance
APPROVAL RECOMMENDED:
________________________________________________
Val Ignacio, Regional Project Manager
APPROVED:

Dina El-Tawansy, District Director Date

ATTACHMENT III
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 2 Vicinity Map
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 3 This project study report-project development support has been prepared under the direction of the following registered civil engineer. The registered civil engineer attests to the technical information contained herein and the engineering data upon which recommendations, conclusions, and decisions are based.

CHRIS BRECHEISEN, P.E. - REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER, KIMLEY-HORN DATE Reviewed by:
_____________________________________
Celia McCuaig, OFFICE CHIEF, ADVANCE PLANNING
03/31/25
C92153
Chris Brecheisen
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 4 Table of Contents

1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 5

2. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................. 6

3. PURPOSE AND NEED....................................................................................... 9

4. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT.................. 12

5. DEFICIENCIES................................................................................................. 17

6. CORRIDOR AND SYSTEM COORDINATION........................................... 19

7. ALTERNATIVES.............................................................................................. 30

8. RIGHT-OF-WAY .............................................................................................. 46

9. STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT............................................................... 51

10. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE............................................................. 53

11. FUNDING ........................................................................................................... 55

12. DELIVERY SCHEDULE.................................................................................. 56

13. RISKS.................................................................................................................. 57

14. EXTERNAL AGENCY COORDINATION.................................................... 57

15. PROJECT REVIEWS ....................................................................................... 58

16. PROJECT PERSONNEL.................................................................................. 58

17. ATTACHMENTS............................................................................................... 59 A. Location Map
B. Vicinity Map
C. Preliminary Layouts
D. Capital Outlay Project Estimates
E. Typical Cross Sections
F. Preliminary Environmental Analysis Report (PEAR)
G. Traffic Engineering Performance Assessment (TEPA)
H. Right-of-Way Conceptual Cost Estimate (RWCCE)
I. Transportation Planning Scoping Information Sheet (TPSIS) J. Risk Register
K. Storm Water Data Report (SWDR)
L. Complete Streets Decision Document (CSDD)
M. Vehicle-Miles Traveled Decision Document (VMTDD)
N. Transportation Plan Management (TMP) Data Sheet
O. Design Scoping Index
P. PSR-PDS Survey Needs Questionnaire
Q. HQ Design PSR-PDS Scoping Checklist
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 5 1. INTRODUCTION
The City of Hayward (City), in cooperation with California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC) proposes to upgrade the State Route 92 (SR 92)/Clawiter Road interchange. The proposed upgrade is the second phase (Phase 2) of the “SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange and Reliever Route Project" which was intended to provide a local reliever route between SR 92 and Interstate 880 (I-880) via Winton Ave, Clawiter Road, Depot Road and Whitesell St. This reliever route would improve access to and from the industrial area north of SR 92 and west of I-880, improve local circulation, and relieve congestion on major arterials in the area. Phase 1, completed in 2017, was comprised of local street modifications which included the widening of West Winton Avenue at the Hesperian Boulevard intersection, signal phasing modifications, and widening and extension of Whitesell Street between Depot Road and SR 92.

The SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project (project) would improve access to and from SR 92 for the industrial areas and office parks just west of Clawiter Road. The project would improve bicycle and pedestrian access and safety through the interchange while maintaining or improving local traffic circulation/operations.

Project Limits 04-ALA-92-R3.9/R4.9
Number of Alternatives 3 Build Alternatives and 1 No Build Current Capital Outlay
Support Estimate for PA&ED
$4.0M to $8.2M (Current 2023)
$4.5M to $9.1M (Escalated to midpoint 2026)
Current Capital Outlay
Construction Cost Range
$49.6M to $102.3M (Current 2023)
$68.4M to $141.1M (Escalated to 2032)
Current Capital Outlay
Right-of-Way Cost Range
$3.8M to $33.9M (Current 2023)
$4.9M to $43.3M (Escalated to 2030)
Funding Source Federal, state, regional, and local
Type of Facility Freeway: 3 General-Purpose Lanes and 1 HOV lane (HOV only in westbound direction)
Number of Structures Breakwater Avenue Pedestrian Overcrossing (Br 33-0655) Clawiter Rd Overcrossing (Br 33-0372)
Whitesell Street overcrossing SR 92 (New Bridge)
Production Avenue overcrossing SR 92 (New Bridge)
Anticipated Environmental
Determination or Document
CEQA - Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
(IS/MND)
NEPA - Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact (EA/FONSI)
Legal Description In Alameda County, from 0.5 miles west of Clawiter Road overcrossing to 0.4 miles east of Clawiter Road overcrossing.

Project Development Category 3
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 6 This PSR-PDS identifies the project scope, schedule, capital cost estimates, and support costs determined to be reasonably necessary to complete needed studies and work in the Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED) phase. A project report will serve as approval of the “selected” alternative and as the formal programming document for the remaining support and capital components of the project. A project report will also program construction and right-of-way costs. Caltrans is providing Quality Management Assessment (QMA) for the project, and it is anticipated that Caltrans would be the lead agency for required National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) approval and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) approval.

2. BACKGROUND
The existing SR 92/Clawiter Road interchange is located in the western end of Hayward and is surrounded by Hayward’s Industrial Technology and Innovation Corridor (HITIC), a large industrial area between the residential areas of Hayward and the San Francisco Bay. The interchange is confined by developed industrial manufacturing and business parks.

Figure 1: Project Limits and Hayward’s Industrial
Technology and Innovation Corridor (HITIC) Limits
The SR 92/Clawiter Road interchange is the western gateway to Hayward from SR 92 and is a partial cloverleaf interchange. The SR 92 mainline runs east and west. It 04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 7 contains three general-purpose lanes and one High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane in the westbound direction within the project limits. In the eastbound direction, the SR 92 mainline contains three general-purpose lanes. SR 92 crosses three major system interchanges including I-280, US 101, and I-880, as well as crossing the San Francisco Bay via the San Mateo-Hayward Bridge just west of the Clawiter Road interchange.

Figure 2: Location Map (Attachment A)
Clawiter Road is a two-lane collector roadway extending in the north-south direction within the project vicinity, running through the center of HITIC. Clawiter Road transitions into Eden Landing Road at the SR 92 eastbound ramp terminal. Clawiter Road/Eden Landing Road provides access to industrial manufacturing and business parks on both sides of SR 92. The posted speed limit on Clawiter Road is 35 mph within the project study area. It is assumed the design speed on Clawiter Road is 40 mph.

Clawiter Road crosses SR 92 on a 4-span prestressed concrete girder overcrossing structure (Br No. 33-0372). The structure was constructed in 1966 with a seismic retrofit modification in 1996. The overcrossing structure has an existing minimum vertical clearance of 15.25 feet over SR 92, which is less than the current Caltrans’ standard vertical clearance of 16.5 feet. There is an existing five-foot sidewalk on the southbound side of the Clawiter Road overcrossing structure with no bicycle facilities. There are no 04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 8 pedestrian or bicycle facilities along Clawiter Road, except the five-foot sidewalk on the existing overcrossing structure. Additionally, the structure has visible signs of impact striking from traffic on SR 92 in both directions of travel.

The City of Hayward initiated the Reliever Route Project in 2008 intended to improve local circulation and access to the industrial/western portion of the city. Phase 1 of the Reliever Route Project focused on improvements to Whitesell Street and was completed in 2017. Whitesell Street is a two-lane road with Class II bike lanes that runs parallel to Clawiter Road at the western end of HITIC. As it approaches SR 92, it curves west becoming Breakwater Avenue which connects to Clawiter Road via two tightly spaced successive intersections. The posted speed limit on Whitesell Street is 30 mph within the project study area. It is assumed the design speed on Whitesell Street is 35 mph. Both Whitesell Street and Clawiter Road are the main north-south collector roads for the industrial/western portion of the city.

The SR 92/Clawiter Road interchange has current and expected increased future heavy truck traffic volumes primarily originating from industrial manufacturing and business parks along Whitesell Street. The heavy truck traffic from Whitesell Street must travel through two consecutively closely spaced intersections (100 feet) from Breakwater Avenue to Clawiter Road prior to accessing the SR 92/Clawiter Road interchange.

Both eastbound and westbound on-ramps (loop on-ramps) to SR 92 have existing ramp metering systems and an HOV preferential lane. The westbound SR 92 on-ramp from Clawiter Road has nonstandard on-ramp geometry including a nonstandard merge length onto the SR 92 mainline. The eastbound SR 92 on-ramp from Clawiter Road enters SR 92 on a dedicated auxiliary lane which ends at the SR 92/I-880 system interchange, with an approximate length of one mile.

The existing bicycle network, where present within the project study area, is primarily Class II facilities. Whitesell Street has Class II bike lanes that end at its intersection with Breakwater Court. Clawiter Road has no bicycle facilities. Eden Landing Road has Class IIB (buffered) bike lanes south of the eastbound ramp terminal and Class II bike lanes east of the ramp terminal. Access to the San Francisco Bay Trail, a generally Class I trail that circles the San Francisco Bay shoreline, is from a Class III facility on Breakwater Avenue north of SR 92 and a Class I pedestrian overcrossing structure connecting from south of SR 92. Existing and planned bicycle infrastructure is shown in Figure 2 in Section 3 of this document. Section 6 provides a list of planned bicycle improvement projects by the City of Hayward in Table 6-3.

AC Transit is the governing transit operator for the City. Currently, there are no active bus routes within the project study area. AC Transit line 83 is an inactive route within the project study area with a nearside bus stop south of the eastbound ramp terminus intersection on Clawiter Road. The route has been suspended due to Covid 19 and has not been reactivated since 2020. AC Transit line 86 is the closest active route to the project study area and crosses Depot Road to the north of the project continuing onto 04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 9 Industrial Boulevard. There is a transit bus service center, MCI service center, on Point Eden Way which attracts buses for servicing.

The proposed improvements, under all viable alternatives, would maintain the existing transit stop for line 83 near the eastbound ramp terminus intersection. Coordination with AC Transit will occur in the PA&ED phase for any impacts to the bus stop from the raising of the eastbound ramp terminal to accommodate the Whitesell overcrossing structure.

The City of Hayward is the implementing agency working in partnership with the Caltrans and Alameda CTC for completion of the PSR-PDS document for Clawiter Road interchange upgrades and improvements along SR 92. The proposed interchange improvements are intended to improve safety for pedestrians and bicyclists; improve access to the industrial/ western portion of the city in and around the interchange area; and improve traffic operations at the ramp intersections.

This project was included in the State Route 238 Local Alternative Transportation Improvement Program (LATIP) that was created to help fill the highway transportation infrastructure need that occurred when the Route 238 Hayward Bypass project was no longer being pursued. The source of funding for the LATIP projects is from the sale of excess Caltrans right-of-way that was purchased for the Route 238 Hayward Bypass project as set forth in California Government Code sections 14528.5 and 14528.6. The project was defined as the “I-880/Route 92 Reliever – Clawiter/Whitesell Interchange Project” in the LATIP Project Initiation Document (PID), dated November 09, 2009.

The LATIP was approved by the California Transportation Commission in May 2010.

This project is listed in the 2020 Alameda Countywide Transportation Plan as a 10-year priority project. It is also listed in the Alameda County Community-Based Transportation Plan 2020. The project is consistent with the City’s 2050 General Plan and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Plan Bay Area (PBA) 2050 Plan.

3. PURPOSE AND NEED
Purpose:

The proposed project has the following primary purposes:
• Improve multimodal access and connectivity for bicyclists and pedestrians traveling across SR 92 at the Clawiter Road interchange, including those accessing regional recreational facilities.
• Improve access to SR 92 from the industrial/businesses located in the western portion of the City of Hayward.
• Improve and optimize traffic operations at the SR 92/Clawiter interchange and along local roadways in proximity to the interchange.
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 10 Need:

The proposed project is needed to address the following concerns:
• There is currently a lack of bicycle/pedestrian facilities on Clawiter Road across SR 92. The existing Clawiter Road overcrossing includes sidewalks on the southbound direction and no bicycle facilities, providing limited multimodal access over SR 92. This creates a stressful bicycle/pedestrian environment for accessing the San Francisco Bay Trail and Ecological Eden Landing Reserve from Clawiter Road.
• The City of Hayward initiated a reliever route project in 2008 intended to improve local circulation and access to the industrial/western portion of the city.

Phase 1 of the reliever route project, which was completed in 2017, focused on improving Whitesell Street. The primary outcome of this project included improved ingress and egress access and traffic congestion relief along I-880, SR 92, and major arterials in the industrial/western portion of the city, including Winton Avenue, Clawiter Road, and Depot Road. The industrial parcels along Whitesell Street currently access SR 92 through the Clawiter Road interchange.

However, the existing configuration of the SR 92/Clawiter Road interchange continues to result in traffic congestion and is deficient in meeting the current and future traffic demand of the industrial/western portion of the city. • The local intersections near the SR 92/Clawiter Road interchange are closely spaced to the on- and off-ramp intersections, and the existing two-quadrant cloverleaf interchange configuration (Type L-7) at the SR 92/Clawiter Road interchange causes long queuing at the ramp terminus intersections, resulting in inefficient interchange operations.

Modal Interrelationships and System Linkages
The existing bicycle network surrounding the project area has a variety of bicycle facilities. Whitesell Street has Class II bike lanes and there is an existing Class I unpaved San Francisco Bay Trail running from south of the project across SR 92 to the north via a bicycle/pedestrian overcrossing (BPOC) structure. Most of the major collectors/arterials currently have planned bike lanes in the City of Hayward Bicycle Master Plan to be constructed in the near future as part of their active transportation plans as shown in Figure 2 on the following page. Pedestrian and bicycle access to the San Francisco Bay Trail from north of SR 92 is limited or does not exist. 04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 11 Figure 2: City of Hayward Existing and Planned Bicycle Infrastructure 04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 12 Planned Transportation Improvements
The SR 92/Clawiter Rd interchange is identified by the City and Alameda CTC for improved access to SR 92 from the western portion of the city. The planned improvements for this interchange and the surrounding area include enhanced bicycle and pedestrian improvements to improve multimodal facilities and connectivity between the south and north sides of SR 92 and to nearby trails. There are also other planned transportation improvement projects in the project area. The City is also currently constructing Class II bikeways along Depot Rd, west of Whitesell Street and along Cabot Boulevard, north of Whitesell Street. The City’s 2020 Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan identifies planned multimodal facilities throughout the city to establish a network of accessible, safe, and integrated bicycle/pedestrian facilities, which this project would incorporate. Approval of this document represents approval of the purpose and need and the range of alternatives to be studied in the PA&ED. Approval of this document does not signify approval of a conceptual alternative.

4. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT (TEPA)
A TEPA was conducted for the project limits utilizing readily available information and applying macro-level analysis. As detailed in Attachment G, the TEPA documents the existing traffic conditions of the study corridor using publicly available traffic data and information. The TEPA analysis determines the existing deficiencies and future growth, as well as the potential operations of the proposed SR 92/Clawiter Road interchange alternatives. Additionally, based on this data, the TEPA identifies and defines the scope of work to be completed in the subsequent PA&ED phase of the project, in the form of a Traffic Operations Analysis Report (TOAR). The following provides a summary of the preliminary assessment and key findings of the TEPA.
4A. Existing Conditions Analysis for Intersection Operations Signalized intersections were evaluated using Synchro 11, a macroscopic analysis and optimization program. Unsignalized intersections were evaluated using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000 methodology as applied in Synchro 11. The HCM uses level of service (LOS) as a performance measure. The measures of effectiveness (MOEs) for intersections are average delay (in seconds per vehicle) and LOS, which ranges from A to F.

Intersection traffic operation under the existing year was analyzed based on traffic counts collected in April 2023. The peak hour characteristics for each intersection were examined based on these traffic counts. For each intersection approach, peak hour factors were calculated, and the measured truck volumes were used to calculate the heavy vehicle percentages.
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 13 The average delay and LOS under the existing AM and PM peak hours were examined for the following seven out of fifteen study intersections:

7. Whitesell Street/Enterprise Avenue (All-Way Stop)

8. Clawiter Road/Enterprise Avenue (Signalized)

9. Clawiter Road/SR 92 WB Ramps (Signalized)

12. Clawiter Road/SR 92 EB Ramps (All-Way Stop)

13. Industrial Boulevard/SR 92 WB Ramps (Signalized)

14. Industrial Boulevard/SR 92 EB Ramps (Signalized)

15. Industrial Boulevard/Tennyson Road (Signalized)
The results can be found in Attachment G, where the TEPA depicts this information in Figures 3.1 and 3.2 and Tables 3.1 and 3.2. It is noticeable from the average daily traffic (ADT) counts that the study area has a high truck percentage, particularly in the SR 92 and Clawiter Road-Whitesell Street interchange area. The study intersections within the TEPA study limits operate with LOS D or better during the AM peak hours, except for the signalized intersection of Industrial Boulevard and SR 92 westbound ramps. This intersection operates at LOS E during the AM peak hours mainly due to heavy traffic from SR 92 accessing Industrial Boulevard. During the PM peak hours, all intersections operate with LOS D or better.
4B. Existing Conditions Analysis for Freeway Operations The Highway Capacity Software (HCS), a software that incorporates all the freeway segment procedures outlined in HCM Chapters 12, 13, and 14 for basic freeway segments, weaving segments, and merge and diverge segments, respectively, was applied to evaluate traffic conditions on SR 92. The MOEs for freeway segments include demand-to-capacity (d/c) ratio, speed (in mph), density (in passenger cars per mile per lane (pcpmpl)), and LOS, which ranges from A to F. The MOE for freeway off-ramps is the 95th percentile queue length (in feet).

In addition to the SR 92 ramps, queues were examined where there is a left or right turn bay at the intersection. Ne queue was found to exceed the storage capacity. Detailed queue length by turning movement can be found in Attachment G.

SR 92 traffic conditions were analyzed for the peak directions only: westbound during the AM peak hours and eastbound during the PM peak hours. Note that there is an HOV lane in the westbound direction between I-880 and the SMH toll plaza. The HOV lane operates between 5:00 AM and 10:00 AM in the morning and between 3:00 PM to 7:00 PM in the afternoon, Monday through Friday.

Analysis was conducted based on PeMS data collected for the typical weekdays in April 2023. On SR 92, between the Industrial Boulevard interchange and the San MateoHayward (SMH) toll plaza, there are twelve PeMS stations in total, with six stations for each direction (including ramps). PeMS data captures the SR 92 mainline traffic counts 04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 14 as well as the on- and off-ramps from/to Clawiter Road and Industrial Boulevard. Peak hour characteristics were examined based on the PeMS data. For each freeway segment, peak hour factors were calculated, and the measured truck volume was used to calculate the heavy vehicle percentages. Besides PeMS data, SMH toll plaza traffic counts in April 2023 were analyzed and summarized.

SMH toll plaza crosses the San Francisco Bay along SR 92. Drivers pay tolls in the westbound direction on the eastern side of the bridge. The toll plaza was operating under All Electronic Tolling (AET) conditions without manual toll collections. Qualified carpool vehicles that use a designated carpool lane pay a reduced price during the carpool hours mentioned above. Commute bus or vanpool vehicle may cross toll free at any time in designated lanes.

INRIX congestion scans and bottleneck locations were illustrated in the TEPA on SR 92 for both the westbound and eastbound directions. In the westbound direction, traffic at the toll plaza starts to back up at 6:30 AM and vehicle queues do not dissipate until close to 10:00 AM. During the AM peak hour between 7:00 and 8:00 AM, the queue extends northeast along westbound SR 92 all the way to I-880. In the eastbound direction, traffic starts to back up as early as 2:30 PM from I-880 and vehicle queues do not dissipate until around 7:30 PM. During the PM peak hour between 4:00 and 5:00 PM, the queue extends to Clawiter Road and beyond.

Because of the capacity constraints downstream of the study area, the capacity adjustment factors (CAF) and speed adjustment factors (SAF) in the HCS models were modified. The HCS reported speeds were compared to INRIX speeds to ensure the model reflects the existing congestion conditions. For consistency, the modified CAF and SAF values were carried over for the opening year analysis. In the westbound direction, both general-purpose (GP) and HOV lanes were analyzed.

The following summarizes the HCS and INRIX analysis:

Westbound SR 92
During the AM peak hours, the westbound SR 92 GP lanes experience congestion on all freeway segments. The average GP lane speed ranges from 15 mph to 35 mph. Given the high density under the congested condition, six of the seven westbound GP freeway segments operate with LOS E or F. The slowest speed for the GP lanes of 15.2 mph occurs on the freeway segment from the Clawiter Road on-ramp to the toll plaza, which operates with LOS F. The HOV lane experiences relatively less congestion, though three out of the seven HOV freeway segments operate with LOS E. The average HOV lane speed ranges from 40 mph to 52 mph, while the slowest speed of 40.5 mph also occurs on the freeway segment from the Clawiter Road on-ramp to the toll plaza, which operates with LOS E.
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 15 Eastbound SR 92
During the PM peak hours, eastbound SR 92 experiences congestion due to the queue backed up from I-880. Four of the seven freeway segments operate with LOS E or F.

The average speed ranges from 21 mph to 46 mph, with the slowest speed of 21 mph occurring on the freeway segment from the Industrial Boulevard on-ramp to the Hesperian Boulevard off-ramp, which operates with LOS F. 4C. Opening Year Conditions Analysis
Opening year conditions, in 2035, were assessed under No Build and three Build alternatives. The Synchro and HCS models developed under the existing conditions were updated to reflect the future baseline conditions in 2035 using annual growth rates.

The roadway network for the Year 2035 No Build model remained the same as existing conditions. The three Build alternatives were then coded based on the No Build model to reflect the proposed improvements.

Like the existing conditions analysis, each 2035 opening year condition analysis was conducted for the intersections in the study area and on SR 92 freeway segments between the Industrial Boulevard interchange and SMH toll plaza. The No Build and Build alternatives analyses are summarized below:

No Build Alternative
With the annual growth rate of 2.1% applied till the 2035 opening year, traffic demands under the No Build Alternative would grow by about 28% compared to the existing conditions.

Intersection Operations
Due to increased future traffic demands, all study intersections would experience longer delays. During the AM peak hours, there are two intersections where the LOS would drop from an acceptable LOS to LOS E or F: the Clawiter Road and SR 92 westbound ramps intersection and the Clawiter Road and SR 92 eastbound ramps intersection.

Another intersection, the Industrial Boulevard and SR 92 westbound ramps intersection, would drop from LOS E to LOS F. For the PM peak hours, there are also two intersections where the LOS drops from an acceptable LOS to LOS F: the Clawiter Road and SR 92 EB ramps intersection and the Industrial Boulevard and SR 92 eastbound ramps intersection.

Freeway Operations
The already heavily congested SR 92 peak direction is further exacerbated under the 2035 No Build condition due to increased traffic demands. Almost all SR 92 freeway segments would be oversaturated and operate at LOS F. Under the existing AM peak condition, about half of the westbound HOV segments already operate with LOS E. 04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 16 With the No Build condition, all HOV lanes would operate at LOS F, as the projected HOV demand would exceed capacity.

Build Alternatives
Intersection Operations
The three proposed alternatives would improve local traffic circulation, particularly for those vehicles on Whitesell Street trying to access SR 92. During the AM peak hours, all three alternatives would result in LOS D or better for all intersections in the study area, except for the Industrial Boulevard and SR 92 WB Ramps intersection, which would stay at LOS F. During the PM peak hours, the same trend would exist, except that the new intersection at Clawiter Road and Whitesell Street under Alternative 1 would operate at LOS E.

Freeway Operations
Almost all peak direction SR 92 freeway segments would be oversaturated and operate at LOS E or F in both No Build and Build alternatives. All HOV lanes would operate at LOS F since the project HOV demand would exceed capacity.

There are no proposed freeway improvements under the three alternatives, except that the westbound on- and off-ramp locations would be shifted approximately 1,200 feet to the west in Alternatives 2 and 3. HCS models show that the change of the on- and offramp locations would have minimum impact on SR 92 freeway traffic operation.

Compared with the No Build Alternative, all Build alternatives would result in a similar LOS since SR 92 freeway segments would remain almost unchanged. 4D. Recommendations
The following recommendations are identified for future traffic study in the PA&ED phase of the work for the SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project:
• Traffic Safety and Collision Analysis: Collision analysis, will be conducted during the PA&ED phase using Caltrans’ Traffic Accident Surveillance and Analysis System (TASAS) and other available resources. Safety analysis will be performed based on the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) methods. • Traffic Data Collection: It is recommended to use the most currently available data such as those collected in 2023 for this project as the baseline conditions.

Although PeMS data is available on SR 92, more accurate freeway mainline data collection using cameras is recommended.
• Traffic Study Area: Alternative 3 proposes to realign and extend Clawiter Road over SR 92 to Production Avenue. It is recommended to extend the study limits further east to include the intersection of Eden Landing Road and Production Avenue in the PA&ED phase. In addition, to account for the potential reroute traffic to Depot Road, Depot Road between Whitesell Street and Clawiter Road is recommended to be included in the study area.
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 17 • Traffic Analysis Years: It is recommended that traffic operational analysis be conducted for Existing, Opening Year 2035, and Design Year 2055 conditions. • Traffic Operational Analysis Hours and Tools: During the PA&ED phase, the consultant team should work with Caltrans D4 and the City of Hayward to determine analysis hours and appropriate tools for mainline freeways and intersections. Traffic operational analysis should be conducted for mainline freeway, ramps, and intersections for either peak periods (5-10 AM) and (3-7 PM) or peak hours (AM and PM). Analysis will be performed using either a micro-simulation tool, such as (e.g., VISSIM) or other tools such as Synchro and HCS. For the selected analysis tool, the latest version should be used. • Traffic Forecasting: Future traffic forecasts will be developed by using the most current Alameda CTC Countywide Travel Demand Model. Traffic forecasting will be estimated by interpolating or extrapolating from the model year scenarios. The Alameda CTC Countywide Travel Demand Model will be updated with all known significant developments that will occur in the area. A Travel Demand Forecasting Methodology Memorandum will be prepared for review and approval before conducting traffic forecasts. • Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis: As per Senate Bill (SB) 743, VMT analysis will be performed for no build and build conditions and reported in the Traffic Forecasting Memorandum and briefly summarized in the TOAR during the PA&ED phase.
• Bicycle and Pedestrian Analysis: Include bicycle and pedestrian LOS analysis for all scenarios.

The findings of the PA&ED traffic analysis will be documented in the Draft and Final TOAR, which will be used to help assess the design alternatives in support of the project purpose and need in the next phase.

5. DEFICIENCIES
As described in the previous sections, the project deficiencies at the SR 92/Clawiter Road interchange are mainly operational resulting in inadequate multimodal accommodation and traffic operations. Increased future traffic demands within the project limits and surrounding industrial/western portion of the city are expected to worsen these deficiencies.

Industrial/Western Portion of the City of Hayward
The interchange is located in an industrial zone with manufacturing sites and office parks with high truck volumes. The project study area and surrounding area suffer from the lack of efficient truck access due to prolonged congestion periods on several major arterials, such as Winton Avenue, Clawiter Road, Depot Road, and the regional routes such as I-880 and SR-92, which is limiting economic development. The City is tracking seven development projects, as shown in Figure 3, in planning or under construction in 04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 18 the project vicinity, with many being commercial projects in the industrial corridor.

These developments will likely increase truck traffic further in the industrial/western part of the city and reinforce the need for improved circulation and access to SR 92. The planned development projects or projects currently in construction within the western portion of the city are shown in Figure 3 on the following page. Freeway, ramp, and local road collision data is summarized in Attachment G, TEPA.

The existing industrial western portion of the city lacks sufficient access to SR 92 and I880. The existing SR 92/Clawiter Road interchange currently provides access for the western portion of the city. The interchange configuration is a two-quadrant cloverleaf with deficiency for existing and future traffic demand conditions due to closely spaced local intersections, inefficient access to parcels along Whitesell Street, and the nonstandard width and vertical clearance of Clawiter Road overcrossing structure. The westbound and eastbound loop on-ramps are configured such that through traffic enters the ramp directly into the HOV preferential lane, resulting in merge conflicts for single occupant vehicles needing to merge right to the GP lane. Additionally, there exists a number of multimodal facility gaps for local connectivity along Clawiter Road. There are no bicycle facilities or crossings at the interchange and there is only a 5-foot pedestrian facility on the Clawiter Road overcrossing structure in the southbound direction. The remainder of the interchange lacks pedestrian facilities.

Figure 3: City of Hayward Planned and Construction Site Development Projects 04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 19 6. CORRIDOR AND SYSTEM COORDINATION
Corridor Overview
SR 92 is a major regional state route acting as an east-west connecting facility, providing access from Half Moon Bay across the San Francisco Peninsula and the SMH Bridge ending in the East Bay at I-880 in Hayward. Therefore, the route is heavily traveled by commuters between the East Bay and the San Francisco Peninsula. SR 92 crosses seven freeways/highways, from west to east: SR 1, SR 35, I-280, SR 82, US 101, I-280, and I-880. SR 92 is also part of the National Highway System, which is a designation for highways essential to the nation’s economy, defense, and mobility by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).

Within the project limits, SR 92 is predominantly a seven-lane freeway. There are three GP lanes and one HOV Lane in the westbound direction and three GP lanes with no HOV in the eastbound direction. The westbound HOV lane facility begins at the Hesperian Boulevard interchange and ends at the SMH Bridge Toll Plaza.

California Assembly Bill number 1386 (AB 1386), which was sponsored by the City of Hayward and passed on July 1, 2009, requires Caltrans to deposit proceeds from the sale of surplus properties in the previously planned SR 238 Hayward Bypass corridor into a special fund to provide greater flexibility with respect to the funding of local infrastructure projects. The City partnered with Caltrans, MTC, San Leandro, Alameda County, and Alameda CTC to develop a SR 238 Local Alternative Transportation Improvement Program (LATIP), as required under AB 1386, that addressed transportation problems and opportunities in the area to be served by the unbuilt facilities along or near the SR 238 Hayward Bypass. The SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project is listed as a priority project in the LATIP Project Initiation Document (PID) approved in 2009. The LATIP was approved by the CTC in May 2010.

A. Federal and State Planning
For federal and state planning and design purposes, SR 92 has the following classifications and designations as shown in Table 6-1.

Table 6-1: Federal and State Planning
Functional
Classification
Trucking
Designations
National
Highway
System (NHS)
Scenic
Highway
Interregional
Road System
(IRRS)
SR
92 High STAA* Other NHS Routes No No
State Planning
The SR 92 Transportation Concept Report (TCR) was completed in September 2016.

The TCR was developed pursuant to the legal requirement for long-range planning 04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 20 documents to guide the logical development of transportation systems as required by law and as necessitated by the public, other stakeholders, and system users. The purpose of the TCR is to evaluate current and projected conditions along the route and communicate the vision for the development of each route in each Caltrans District during a 25-year planning horizon. The 25-year concept for the segment in which the project vicinity is located recommends that the segment remains as a 4-6 lane freeway.

Strategies that are recommended for this segment include:
• Study feasibility of additional lane (HOV/HOT)
• Continue I/C improvements at SR 82, 101
• Study ramp-braiding in areas of weaving
• Implement TOS elements & ramp metering
• Maintain & improve Park & Ride lots
• Close gaps within the corridor’s bicycle network (parallel and intersecting routes) • Improve pedestrian environment at I/S and I/C in areas with pedestrian demand Regional Planning
The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) is the State-designated Regional Transportation Planning Agency and the federal-designated Metropolitan Planning Organization for the San Francisco Bay Area. The MTC is responsible for the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), a long-range (though financially constrained) planning report for the region. Under Senate Bill 375, along with an updated RTP, each region in California is mandated to develop a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) that promotes compact, mixed-use commercial and residential development that is walkable, bikeable, and close to mass transit, jobs, schools, shopping, parks, recreation, and other amenities to help achieve the greenhouse gas emission reduction target outlined in SB

32. In partnership with the Regional Planning Agency Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), MTC developed Plan Bay Area (PBA) 2050, approved in October 2021. PBA 2050 serves as the San Francisco Bay Area’s RTP and SCS and is the latest strategic update to PBA 2040 from 2017. PBA 2050 is comprised of 35 strategies focused on improving housing, economic growth, transportation, and the environment for the Bay Area’s nine counties. These strategies serve as a blueprint to inform the nine counties of the Bay Area to plan and create a more resilient and equitable region over the next 30 years and beyond. Each strategy is a public policy or investment to be implemented collaboratively at the city, county, regional, or state level with equity as the priority for execution. An update to PBA 2050, called Plan Bay Area 2050+ is currently underway. This is a limited and focused update to the plan, that will refine select plan strategies using lessons learned from the last three years and will also enable continued progress implementing the strategies of the Plan.

Local Planning
The Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC) is a joint powers authority that plans, funds and delivers transportation programs and projects that expand 04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 21 access and improve mobility to foster a vibrant and livable Alameda County. Alameda CTC also serves as the county's congestion management agency. It is governed by 22 elected officials representing all 14 cities in Alameda County. Alameda CTC coordinates countywide transportation planning efforts; programs local, regional, state and federal funding; and delivers projects and programs including those approved by voters in Alameda County transportation expenditure plans for Measure B, Measure BB, and the Vehicle Registration Fee.

The Alameda Countywide Transportation Plan (CTP) is a long-range policy document that guides future transportation investments, programs, policies and advocacy for all of Alameda County through 2050. The CTP, which is updated approximately every four years, identifies a number of future trends, issues and challenges for the County including safety and more specifically an increase in the number of collisions on roadways. Alameda CTC is currently developing the next update to this plan and is expected to be completed in 2026. There are no projects identified within the vicinity of the project limits.

B. Future Projects
SHOPP
The following projects within the vicinity of EA 04-0Y600K are included in the State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) and other funding programs.

SHOPP is the State’s “fix-it-first” program that funds the repair, safety improvements, some highway operational improvements, and preservation of the State Highway System (SHS).

Table 6-2: SHOPP Projects Located in the Vicinity
PROJ
ID EA CountyRoute
Post
Mile
Funding
Source/
Program
Year
Legal Description Work Description
04190
00568 0AA80 ALA 880, 92 N/A
2022
SHOPP/
2024/25
In Alameda County, on
Routes 92 and 880 at
various locations.

Replace technology
components of
Transportation
Management System
(TMS) elements.
04200
00167 0W050 ALA880, 92 N/A
2022
SHOPP/
2025/26
In Alameda County, on
Routes 92 and 880 at
various locations.

Install trash capture
devices.
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 22 PROJ
ID EA CountyRoute
Post
Mile
Funding
Source/
Program
Year
Legal Description Work Description
04190
00445 0AA14 ALA92
R2.4
00/6.
800
2022
SHOPP/
2024/25
In Alameda County In
Hayward from 0.2 Mile
West of San MateoHayward Main Toll
Plaza to Santa Clara
Street.

Rehabilitate pavement
and upgrade facilities
to Americans with
Disabilities Act
(ADA) standards.
04210
00384 3W520 ALA880 N/A
2022
SHOPP/
2022/23
In and near Hayward, on
Route 880 at various
locations.

Apply polyester
concrete overlay to
bridge decks and
repair asphalt concrete
approach slabs.
(Bridge Deck
Preservation)
04180
00048 0Q180 ALA880 N/A
2022
SHOPP/
2022/23
In Alameda County, on
Route 880 at various
locations.

Construct permanent
Best Management
Practices (BMPs) to
achieve statewide
National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES)
permit compliance
units for trash capture
and Total Maximum
Daily Load (TMDL).
04190
00044 2Q740 ALA880 N/A
2022
SHOPP/
2022/23
In Alameda County, on
Route 880 at various
locations.

Install and upgrade
Transportation
Management System
(TMS) elements
including Closed
Circuit Television
(CCTV) cameras,
Vehicle Detection
Systems (VDS),
Changeable Message
Signs (CMS), ramp
meters, and fiber optic
cable.
04230
00212 3Y240 ALA880 N/A
2022
SHOPP/
2022/23
In Alameda County, on
Route 880 at various
locations.

Repair damaged
pavement and replace
striping.
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 23 PROJ
ID EA CountyRoute
Post
Mile
Funding
Source/
Program
Year
Legal Description Work Description
04230
00184 2Y970 ALAVar N/A
2022
SHOPP/
2022/23
In Alameda County on
various routes at various
locations.

Remove hazard trees,
replace fencing and
signs, and place
erosion control.
04230
00206 3Y190 ALAVar N/A
2022
SHOPP/
2022/23
In Alameda County on
various routes at various
locations.

Repair and replace
signal poles, light
poles, and signal
cabinets.
04190
00023 2Q540 ALAVar N/A
2022
SHOPP/
2023/24
In various counties, on
various routes at various
locations.

Replace camera units
and related technology
components of
Closed-Circuit
Television (CCTV)
camera systems.

Components include
camera controller,
video encoder units,
communication and
networking
equipment, and power
distribution
assemblies. This is a
Design-Build project.

PBA 2050
In the MTC PBA 2050, this project is located in an area designated for priority development (Moffett Park) to meet transportation and planning criteria adopted under ABAG Resolution Number 02-19. This project is also included in the PBA 2050 project list as RTPID No. 21-T06-041 to implement interchange improvements at the SR 92/Clawiter Road interchange. The following projects are located within the vicinity of EA 04-0Y600K in the MTC PBA 2050.

Table 6-3: MTC’s PBA 2050 Projects Located in the Vicinity 04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 24 County &
Route
Sponsor RTPID Description
Project
Completion
Date*
All Bay
Area Toll
Bridges
MTC 21-T01-
005
This program includes funding to operate and
maintain the Bay Area’s seven state-owned toll
bridges and generally implement the region’s
Toll Bridge Program. Improvements include
toll bridge rehabilitation, replacement or
retrofitting with no new capacity, and toll
operations.

Varies
All Bay
Area
Highways
MTC 21-T01-
006
This program includes funding to operate and
maintain the Bay Area’s state highways and
generally implement the SHOPP.

Improvements include resurfacing and/or
rehabilitation with no new capacity;
preventative maintenance; striping
improvements for bicycle and/or pedestrian
facilities; and emergency repair.

Varies
ALA 880,
SM 92 MTC 21-T05-012
This program includes funding to implement
toll infrastructure, such as toll gantries, to
collect per-mile tolls charged to vehicles on the
Bay Area’s congested freeway corridors with
transit alternatives. Toll corridors include I-880
in Alameda County and SR 92 in San Mateo
County.
2021-2035
ALA 880 MTC 21-T06-
024
This program includes funding to implement
interchange improvements in Hayward between
Whipple Rd and Industrial Pkwy, and Winton
Ave and A St.
2021-2035
ALA 92 MTC 21-T06-
041
This program includes funding to implement
interchange improvements at Clawiter
Rd/Whitesell St.
2021-2035
All Bay
Area
Highways
MTC 21-T06-
048
This program includes funding to implement
other programmatic investments to improve
interchanges and address highway bottlenecks.

This program generally implements county and
other local programs and initiatives to
programmatically implement highway
improvements. Improvements include
interchange modifications and minor lane
additions, or lane extensions of less than 1/4-
mile (i.e., highway or freeway lane, auxiliary
lane, or HOV lane). Example investments
include implementation of VTA's Envision
Highway Minor Projects.

Varies
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 25 County &
Route
Sponsor RTPID Description
Project
Completion
Date*
All Bay
Area MTC 21-T06-049
This program includes funding to implement
initiatives to maximize the efficiency of
freeway and arterial systems through active
traffic demand management and multimodal
strategies. Improvements include
implementation of toll bridge corridor
"forward" programs, adaptive ramp metering,
adaptive signal timing with transit signal
priority, bus on shoulder lanes, congestion
pricing on toll bridge corridors, arterial first
and last mile solutions, and shared mobility
pilot deployments.

Varies
All Bay
Area Toll
Bridges
MTC 21-T07-
051
This program includes funding to support the
All-Electronic Tolling Program, which converts
the seven state-owned toll bridges to Open
Road Tolling. Improvements include
procurement of a new toll system and overhead
gantries, improvements to roadway
infrastructure to allow for high-speed tolling,
and support of a regional customer service
center.

Varies
All Bay
Area MTC 21-T07-057
This program includes funding to implement
technology improvements on the Bay Area’s
transportation systems. This program generally
implements county, transit agency, and other
local management systems’ travel demand
management and emissions reduction
technologies programs and initiatives.

Improvements include incident management;
signal coordination; intelligent transportation
systems; traffic operations systems/congestion
management systems; ramp metering;
computer aided dispatch/automatic vehicle
location; fare media; construction or renovation
of power, signal, and communications systems;
toll management systems; toll media; car and
bike share; alternative fuel vehicles and
facilities; parking programs; carpool/vanpool;
ridesharing activities; information, marketing
and outreach; and traveler information.

Varies
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 26 County &
Route
Sponsor RTPID Description
Project
Completion
Date*
All Bay
Area MTC 21-T08-060
This program includes funding to implement a
regional Complete Streets network with an
emphasis on improvements near transit and in
Equity Priority Communities. It also includes
funding to implement county and local
initiatives to support active transportation
systems. Investments include new and extended
bike and pedestrian facilities; minor bicycle
and/or pedestrian facility gap closures; minor
road diets (less than ¼-mile); ADA
compliance; landscaping; lighting; streetscape
improvements; secure bike parking at transit
stations; and support to local jurisdictions to
maintain and expand car-free slow streets.

Example projects in Alameda County include
East Bay Greenway and Urban Greenways and
Trails.

Varies
ALA 92,
880 MTC 21-T12-116
This program includes funding to implement
express lanes through HOV lane conversions in
Alameda County including SR 92; freeway
lane conversions in Alameda County including
I-880; new lanes in Alameda County including
I-880.
2021-2035
ALA 880 ReX
(Basic)
21-T12-
127
This program includes funding to implement
new express bus service in Alameda County
along I-880 between Downtown Oakland (19th
St BART Station) and Redwood City (Caltrain
Station). Improvements include high-frequency
service (10-minute peak headways) and station
area amenities such as upgraded local bus
stops, taxi/TNC loading zones, and improved
bicycle/pedestrian infrastructure.
2021-2035
STIP
The California State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) is the biennial fiveyear plan adopted by the California Transportation Commission for future allocations of certain state transportation funds for state highway improvements, intercity rail, and regional highway, and transit improvements. There are no projects in the project vicinity included in the STIP.

The list of projects shown in Table 6-2 and Table 6-3 may not be inclusive of all projects listed in the 2022 SHOPP and MTC’s RTP. Further coordination with the Office of System & Regional Planning will be conducted in the PA&ED phase to obtain the full list of relevant projects within the project vicinity.

Complete Streets
A Complete Street is a transportation facility that is planned, designed, operated, and maintained to provide safe mobility for all users. All transportation improvements (new 04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 27 and retrofit) are viewed as opportunities to improve safety, mobility, and access for all travelers, including public transit users, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Attachment L contains the Complete Streets Decision Document for this project. This project Purpose and Need is consistent with the goals of Complete Streets and Caltrans Deputy Directive 64-R2. Improvements to local roads at the SR 92/Clawiter Road interchange have considered all modes of transportation including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit, and motorists by implementing Caltrans Complete Streets Policies. Such improvements include upgraded sidewalks, bikeways, and consideration for more pedestrian/bicycle friendly ramp intersection geometry to support and enhance the larger bicycle and pedestrian network in the area through improved connectivity.

The 2020 City of Hayward Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan identifies planned multimodal facilities throughout the city to establish a network of accessible, safe, and integrated bicycle/pedestrian facilities, which this project would incorporate. There are several initiatives and plans identified to provide bicycle facilities adjacent to local roadways within the HITIC including Clawiter Road, Depot Road, and Breakwater Avenue. All the alternatives presented in this document are consistent with this approach.

The following projects are listed in the 2020 City of Hayward Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan within the vicinity of the project study area:

Table 6-4: 2020 City of Hayward Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan Projects Located in the Vicinity
Project
ID
Priority
Rating Corridor Name From To Proposed Facility Recommendations 175A,
175B,
176A
High San Francisco
Bay Trail
Eden Shores
Neighborhood
San Mateo Bridge
Overcrossing
Eden Landing Rd
San Mateo Bridge
Overcrossing
Winton Ave
Connection
Eden Landing Rd
Class I Multi-Use Path
(All Ages & Abilities)
113A,
113B,
113C
High Depot Rd/Cathy
Wy
Cabot Blvd
Industrial Blvd
Adrian Ave
Industrial Blvd
Adrian Ave
Calaroga Ave
Class IV Separate
Bikeway (All Ages &
Abilities)
Class II Bike Lane
(All Ages & Abilities)
Class II buffered Bike
Lane (All Ages &
Abilities)
116A Medium Industrial Blvd Hesperian Blvd Clawiter Rd
Class IV Separated
Bikeway (All Ages &
Abilities)
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 28 Project
ID
Priority
Rating Corridor Name From To Proposed Facility Recommendations 114A,
114B Low Breakwater Ave
San Francisco
Bay Trail
Whitesell St
Whitesell St
San Francisco
Bay Trail
Class II Bike Lane
(All Ages & Abilities)
131A Low Eden Landing
Rd/Clawiter Rd
San Francisco
Bay Trail Arden Rd
Class III Bike
Boulevard (All Ages
& Abilities)
131B Low Eden Landing
Rd/Clawiter Rd Arden Rd Clawiter Rd
Class II Buffered Bike
Lane (All Ages &
Abilities)
131C Low Eden Landing
Rd/Clawiter Rd Eden Landing Rd Breakwater Ave
Class IV Separated
Bikeway (All Ages &
Abilities)
131D Low Eden Landing
Rd/Clawiter Rd Breakwater Ave Depot Rd
Class IV Separated
Bikeway (All Ages &
Abilities)
The Alameda CTC 2022 Alameda Countywide Bikeway Network Plan outlines a comprehensive plan to develop an interconnected network of bikeways throughout Alameda County with a focus on improving bicycle infrastructure and safety. The document identifies key routes, strategies, and funding priorities to promote active transportation and enhance the overall bicycle experience within the county. All the alternatives presented in this document are consistent with the design recommendations and implementation of bikeways to consider facilities for all ages and abilities.

The project would also be consistent with the Alameda CTC 2019 Countywide Active Transportation Plan (CATP). SR 92 is identified in the CATP as an interruption of the local bicycle and pedestrian network in the western portion of Hayward toward the SMH Bridge. Improving multimodal access across SR 92 and to the San Francisco Bay Trail is aligned with the CATP goals and objectives for the county and city. This project would also play a major role in connecting the local residents of the city with a planned bikeway project on the SMH Bridge listed in all of the aforementioned active transportation plans and the City of Hayward Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan.

In the PA&ED phase, the project will coordinate with the Caltrans Office of Landscape Architecture to receive input on any Complete Street aesthetic elements for this project. 04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 29 The District 4 2018 Bicycle Plan evaluates bicycle needs on and across the Bay Area’s state transportation network. It identifies infrastructure improvements to enhance bicycle safety and mobility and remove some of the barriers to bicycling in the region. This plan builds on the 2017 California State Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, Toward an Active California, and will guide District 4 and its partners to develop an integrated bicycle network for the Bay Area. The District 4 2018 Bicycle Plan does not include any proposed improvements at the SR 92/Clawiter Road interchange. A top tier project (Project Number: SMAI-92-C01) is identified for a Class I facility along SR 92 between San Mateo and Hayward along the SMH Bridge. Additionally, the San Francisco Bay Trail, which is within the project study area, is included as an existing bicycle network for Bay Area bicycle highway opportunities to utilize.

Climate Change
Sea level rise (SLR) is an integral part of climate change discussions, the effects of which will have impacts on all modes of transportation located near the coast and bay.

Screening criteria are used to assess whether an individual project will potentially be impacted by SLR. This project is located near the San Francisco Bay and in an area vulnerable to SLR according to available mapping. It has been noted in Attachment I that the west end of the project study area would be affected in some capacity by SLR if the level rises by over 5.75 feet (1.75 meters) or there is a storm surge of 5.75 feet (1.75 meters) per the Caltrans Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment Map.

According to the SLR map published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Coastal Services Center, SR 92 itself is not subject to SLR, but the surrounding areas west of the SR 92/Clawiter Interchange are impacted. Nearby lowlying areas would be subject to the effects of SLR the most, which include the San Francisco Bay Trail and a limited portion of Breakwater Avenue west of Whitesell Street. There are no projects identified in the MTC’s PBA 2050 to address SLR within the project study area or within the surrounding area.

The project will provide needed interchange improvements that will reduce congestion and improve accessibility and safety to the industrial/western portion of the city from SR

92. One of the goals of transportation routes located near the coast is to ensure reliable transportation routes are available. In consideration of these factors, the project will warrant further consideration of SLR in the PA&ED phase.

The City of Hayward is currently updating its Climate Action Plan (CAP) to outline a strategy to achieve carbon neutrality by 2045. The purpose of the CAP is to make Hayward a more environmentally and socially sustainable community by reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Currently the Hayward 2040 General Plan functions as the CAP and community risk reduction plan. This project will incorporate any pertinent information from the CAP pertaining to this project study area in the PA&ED phase.

To the extent a project relieves congestion by enhancing operations and improving travel times in high congestion travel corridors, greenhouse gas emissions may be 04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 30 reduced. As the purpose of the project is to improve and optimize access to SR 92 and provide more inviting multimodal facilities, the project could result in carbon dioxide (CO2) emission reductions. The interchange improvements are freeway operational refinements which would not increase capacity of SR 92, generate additional trips, or increase VMT. This is documented further in the Vehicle Miles Traveled Decision Document (VMTDD) in Attachment M.

Classified Landscaped Freeway
A classified landscaped freeway is a section of freeway with ornamental vegetation planting that meets the criteria established by the California Code of Regulations, Outdoor Advertising Regulations, Title 4, Division 6. Between post mile 4.27 and 6.23 (just west of the Clawiter Rd interchange to the I-880 interchange) SR 92 is listed as a Classified Landscape Freeway. The project will require minimization efforts to ensure that the proposed project and work maintains the status of classified landscape freeway.

Efforts may include protecting existing trees during construction activities and returning staging and equipment storage areas to pre-existing conditions. If trees or vegetation are damaged or removed, a reevaluation of the work and potential required replacement planting will need to be conducted. Additionally, planting will be placed in areas of demolished ramps to preserve this status.

7. ALTERNATIVES
This section provides a discussion of the No Build Alternative, and the Build Alternatives under consideration.

A. No Build Alternative
Under the No Build Alternative, the existing SR 92/Clawiter Road two-quadrant cloverleaf (Type L-7) interchange would remain unchanged, except for existing planned and programmed improvements to the SR 92 corridor, and development in the western portion of the City of Hayward. The existing traffic operations would worsen as volumes increase due to the interchange configuration including unaddressed insufficient intersection spacing combined with absent/conflicting multimodal crossings at uncontrolled intersections. The No Build Alternative represents the baseline alternative and offers a basis for the analysis and evaluation of the Build Alternatives. The No Build Alternative does not meet the Purpose and Need.

B. Build Alternatives
The Build Alternatives included in this PSR-PDS are intended to provide a range of improvements to evaluate during the PA&ED phase, define an adequate footprint for environmental technical studies, provide opportunities to meet geometric standards to the extent feasible, minimize environmental impacts, and provide cost-effective solutions.
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 31 The project proposes to improve traffic operations at the SR 92/Clawiter interchange and access to and from the western portion of the City of Hayward, construct ramp terminus intersections, construct local street improvements, improve bicycle and pedestrian access and connectivity, and accommodate future planned growth and development consistent with City and multimodal transportation plans for the project area.

Alternative 1: Combined Whitesell/Clawiter Interchange
The existing SR 92 eastbound ramps on Clawiter Road/Eden Landing Road would be reconfigured to a new partial diamond interchange with a signalized ramp terminus intersection on Whitesell Street. Whitesell Street would be extended with a new overcrossing structure over SR 92. The new overcrossing structure would provide two travel lanes in each direction along Whitesell Street including Class IV bicycle facilities and sidewalks. The proposed overcrossing structure would be 100’ wide and approximately 375’ long. The type of structure would be determined in the PA&ED phase during the structure type selection process.

The existing westbound Clawiter Road on- and off-ramp to SR 92 would remain.

Sidewalks would be constructed to the north and south of the existing Clawiter Road overcrossing structure to close the existing sidewalk gap between the overcrossing structure and the local intersections. Additionally, sharrows would be placed to denote a Class III system on the existing overcrossing structure. Additional traffic calming measures along Clawiter Rd will be studied further in the PA&ED phase.

The new signalized intersection of Whitesell Street and Clawiter Road would be raised with retaining walls to minimize right of way acquisitions. The type of retaining wall would be selected in the PA&ED phase.

The two interchanges at Whitesell Street and Clawiter Road would functionally operate as one interchange. The existing driveway to the Bay Center Business Park would be reconstructed and maintained from Whitesell Street.

Breakwater Avenue, connecting Whitesell Street to Clawiter Road, would be realigned to direct traffic under the Whitesell Street overcrossing structure, and would include Class II or IV bicycle facilities.

Alternative 2: Diamond Interchange with Partial Access
The existing SR 92/Clawiter Road interchange would be relocated to Whitesell Street for all travelers to access SR 92 at a new diamond interchange with signalized ramp terminus intersections. Whitesell Street would be extended with a new overcrossing structure over SR 92. The overcrossing structure would provide two through travel lanes in each direction along Whitesell Street, Class IV bicycle facilities, and sidewalks. The proposed overcrossing structure would be 100’ wide and approximately 445’ long. The type of structure would be determined in the PA&ED phase during the structure type selection process.
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 32 The existing westbound SR 92 loop on-ramp from Clawiter Road and the existing eastbound on- and off-ramps from Clawiter Road to SR 92 would be removed. Pending future traffic forecasting to be performed during the PA&ED phase, the existing westbound off-ramp to Clawiter Road could be maintained. Sidewalks would be constructed to the north and south of the existing Clawiter Road overcrossing structure to close the existing sidewalk gap between the structure and the local intersections.

Additionally, sharrows would be placed to denote a Class III system on the existing overcrossing structure. Additional traffic calming measures along Clawiter Rd will be studied further in the PA&ED phase. The new signalized intersection of Whitesell Street and Clawiter Road would be raised with retaining walls to minimize right of way acquisitions. The type of retaining wall would be selected in the PA&ED phase.

The two interchanges at Whitesell Street and Clawiter Road would functionally operate as one interchange if the additional westbound off-ramp to Clawiter Road is warranted.

Breakwater Avenue would be closed between Clawiter Road and Whitesell Street. A new roadway would be constructed through two parcels to connect Breakwater Court to Whitesell Street. The intersection of Whitesell Street/Bay Center Place/Breakwater Avenue would be a new signalized intersection.

A new roadway connection to maintain access to Breakwater Avenue would be constructed from Bay Center Place to Breakwater Avenue, including right-of-way impacts through the Bay Center Business Park. The roadway would include Class II or Class IV bicycle facilities.

Alternative 3: Whitesell Street Diamond Interchange
The existing SR 92/Clawiter Road interchange would be relocated to Whitesell Street for all travelers to access SR 92 at a new diamond interchange with signalized ramp terminus intersections. Whitesell Street would be extended and realigned with a new overcrossing structure over SR 92 until the Point Eden Way and Eden Landing Road intersection. The overcrossing structure would provide two through travel lanes in each direction along Whitesell Street including Class IV bicycle facilities and sidewalks. The proposed overcrossing structure would be 112’ wide and approximately 280’ long. The type of structure would be determined in the PA&ED phase during the structure type selection process.

The existing eastbound and westbound on- and off-ramp from Clawiter Road to SR 92 would be removed. The existing Clawiter Road overcrossing structure would be demolished and removed and the existing intersection at Eden Landing Road and Clawiter Road would be removed. Clawiter Road would provide local connectivity with a new overcrossing structure over SR 92 to Production Avenue, with one through lane in each direction. This overcrossing structure would not have access to SR 92. Multimodal facilities for pedestrians and bicycles would be provided on the new Production Avenue overcrossing structure, including Class IV bicycle facilities and sidewalks. The proposed 04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 33 overcrossing structure would be 50’ wide and approximately 220’ long. The type of structure would be determined in the PA&ED phase during the structure type selection process.

Breakwater Avenue would be closed between Clawiter Road and Whitesell Street. A new roadway would be constructed through two parcels connecting Breakwater Court to Whitesell Street. The intersection of Whitesell Street/Bay Center Place/Breakwater Avenue would be a new signalized intersection.

Eden Landing Road would be reconfigured and partially raised to connect Production Avenue and Whitesell Street. The connection to Whitesell Street would be a “right in/right out” only intersection.

C. Nonstandard Features
The Build Alternatives will not improve all of the existing nonstandard features and will include new nonstandard boldface and underlined design features, such as paved shoulder width, horizontal minimum clearance to objects, cross slopes, and stopping sight distance.

The nonstandard features are identified from available topography-mapping survey information provided by Caltrans as-builts and also from Hayward as-builts for the Phase 1 Local Reliever Route Project which completed construction in 2017. A more detailed survey will be executed in future phases to identify locations for nonstandard features within the project limits. Table 7-1 provides a list of anticipated nonstandard features, both existing and proposed, for the Build Alternatives with anticipated approximate locations, since no survey has been performed as part of this work. All nonstandard features identified do not conform to the design standards of the seventh edition Caltrans Highway Design Manual (HDM). A Design Standard Decision Document (DSDD) will be developed during the PA&ED phase to document design decisions including the nonstandard features that will be part of the Build Alternatives. 04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 34 Table 7-1: Design Standard Risk Assessment
Alternative
Design Standard
from Highway
Design Manual
Standard Design
Requirement
Location/
Description
(P) – Proposed
(E) – Existing
(S) - Standard
Probability of
Nonstandard Design
Feature Approval
(None, Low,
Medium, High)
Justification for
Probability Rating
Alt 1
Alt 2
Alt 1
Alt 2
Alt 1
Alt 2
Alt 3
Index 201.4
Stopping Sight
Distance at Grade
Crests
(Boldface
Standards) (P)
Figure 201.4 shows the
minimum standards for
stopping sight distance
related to design speed for
motorists.
[250’ for 35 mph]
[360’ for 45 mph]
Crest curve on proposed
SR 92 eastbound on-ramp
from Whitesell St:
(P) 235’ SSD
(S) 250’ SSD
Crest curve on existing
Clawiter Rd OC:
(P) 257’ SSD [35 mph]
(E) 257’ SSD [35 mph]
(S) 360’ SSD [45 mph]
Crest curve on proposed
Whitesell St OC:
(P) 257’ SSD [35 mph]
(S) 360’ SSD [45 mph]
High
Medium
Medium
Standard vertical curve
would require
reconstruction of Clawiter
Rd overcrossing.

Standard vertical curve
would require
reconstruction of Clawiter
Rd overcrossing.

Standard vertical curve
would require significant
raising of the Eden
Landing Rd and Clawiter
Rd intersection and
approach roadways.

Additionally, the
intersection at Bay Center
Pl would need to be
raised.

Alt 1
Alt 2
Index 201.5
Stopping Sight
Distance at Grade
Sags
(Boldface
Standards) (P)
Figure 201.5 shows the
minimum standards for
stopping sight distance
related to design speed for
motorists.
[250’ for 35 mph]
[360’ for 45 mph]
Sag curve on proposed SR
92 eastbound on-ramp from
Whitesell St:
(P) 160’ SSD
(S) 430’ SSD
Low Standard vertical curve
would require
reconstruction of Clawiter
Rd overcrossing.
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 35 Alternative
Design Standard
from Highway
Design Manual
Standard Design
Requirement
Location/
Description
(P) – Proposed
(E) – Existing
(S) - Standard
Probability of
Nonstandard Design
Feature Approval
(None, Low,
Medium, High)
Justification for
Probability Rating
Alt 1
Alt 2
Alt 1
Alt 2
Alt 1
Alt 2
Alt 3
[430’ for 50 mph] Sag Curve south of existing
Clawiter Rd OC:
(P) 280’ SSD [35 mph]
(E) 280’ SSD [35 mph]
(S) 360’ SSD [45 mph]
Sag Curve north of existing
Clawiter Rd OC:
(P) 280’ SSD [35 mph]
(E) 280’ SSD [35 mph]
(S) 360’ SSD [45 mph]
Sag Curve north of
proposed Whitesell St OC:
(P) 250’ SSD [35 mph]
(S) 360’ SSD [45 mph]
Medium
Medium
Medium
Standard vertical curve
would require
reconstruction of Clawiter
Rd overcrossing.

Standard vertical curve
would require
reconstruction of Clawiter
Rd overcrossing.

Standard vertical curve
would require significant
raising of the Eden
Landing Rd and Clawiter
Rd intersection and
approach roadways.

Additionally, the
intersection at Bay Center
Pl would need to be
raised.

Alt 3 Index 201.6
Stopping Sight
Distance on
Horizontal Curves
Where an object off the
pavement such as a bridge
pier, building, cut slope, or
natural growth restricts sight
distance, the minimum radius
Concrete Barrier on West
side of Realigned SB
Whitesell St:
(P) 263’ SSD [35 mph]
(S) 360’ SSD [45 mph]
Medium A standard stopping sight
distance around this curve
would require the
retaining wall and
concrete barrier to be
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 36 Alternative
Design Standard
from Highway
Design Manual
Standard Design
Requirement
Location/
Description
(P) – Proposed
(E) – Existing
(S) - Standard
Probability of
Nonstandard Design
Feature Approval
(None, Low,
Medium, High)
Justification for
Probability Rating
(Boldface
Standards) (P)
of curvature is determined by
the stopping sight distance.

Available stopping sight
distance on horizontal curves
is obtained from Figure
201.6.
pushed an additional 19’
from the roadway
requiring row acquisition
and building demolition.

Alt 1
Alt 2
Index 208.4
Bridge Sidewalks
(Boldface
Standards) (E)
The minimum width of a
bridge sidewalk shall be 6
feet.

Clawiter Rd overcrossing
sidewalk width:
(P) No Change
(E) 5’
High Existing condition.

Standard sidewalk width
would require
reconstruction of Clawiter
Rd overcrossing.

Alt 1
Alt 2
Alt 2
Alt 2
Index 302.1:

Shoulder Width
(Boldface
Standards) (P)
The shoulder widths given in
Table 302.1 shall be the
minimum continuous usable
width of paved shoulder on
highways.
[6 or more lanes:

Paved Shoulder Left: 10'
Paved Shoulder Right: 10']
[Multilane ramps:

Paved Shoulder Left: 4’
Paved Shoulder Right: 8’]
Eastbound SR 92 on-ramp
outside shoulder from
proposed CHP pullout to
east side of Clawiter Rd
overcrossing:
(P) Var 5' to 8'
(S) 8’
Westbound SR 92 right
shoulder from 400’ east of
Clawiter Rd overcrossing
to proposed westbound SR92 off-ramp to Whitesell
St.:
(P) 6’ -10’
(E) 2’-10’
(S) 10’
Westbound SR 92 off-ramp
right shoulder from
beginning of proposed
westbound SR 92 off-ramp
High
High
High
Standard shoulder would
require reconstruction of
Clawiter Rd overcrossing.

Standard shoulder would
require reconstruction of
Clawiter Rd overcrossing.

Standard shoulder would
require reconstruction of
Clawiter Rd overcrossing.
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 37 Alternative
Design Standard
from Highway
Design Manual
Standard Design
Requirement
Location/
Description
(P) – Proposed
(E) – Existing
(S) - Standard
Probability of
Nonstandard Design
Feature Approval
(None, Low,
Medium, High)
Justification for
Probability Rating
Alt 2
Alt 3
to Whitesell St to 100’ west
of the beginning of
proposed westbound SR 92
off-ramp to Whitesell St:
(P) Var 4' to 8'
(S) 8’
Westbound SR 92 right at
existing Bridgewater Ave
pedestrian overcrossing:
(P) Var 2’ to 10’
(E) 6.5’
(S) 10’
High Standard shoulder would
require reconstruction of
pedestrian overcrossing.

Alt 1
Alt 2
Index 308.1:

Cross Section
Standards for Local
Streets with
Connection to State
Facilities
(Boldface
Standards) (E)
Where a local facility crosses
over or under a freeway or
expressway and connects to
the State facility (such as
ramp terminal intersections),
the minimum design
standards for the cross
section of the local facility
are different. They shall be at
least equal to those for a
conventional highway with
the exception that the outside
shoulder width shall match
the approach roadway, but
not less than 4’, and as
shown below.

Shoulder width shall not be
less than 5 feet when railings
or other lateral obstructions
Clawiter Rd outside
shoulders between Eden
Landing Rd and
Breakwater Ave:
(P) No Change
(E) 2’
High Standard approach
shoulders would require
bridge widening. No
proposed modifications to
Clawiter Rd overcrossing.

Widening will not likely
be approved due to age of
structures.
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 38 Alternative
Design Standard
from Highway
Design Manual
Standard Design
Requirement
Location/
Description
(P) – Proposed
(E) – Existing
(S) - Standard
Probability of
Nonstandard Design
Feature Approval
(None, Low,
Medium, High)
Justification for
Probability Rating
are adjacent to the right edge
of shoulder.

If gutter pans are used, then
the minimum shoulder width
shall be 3 feet wider than the
width of the gutter pan being
used.

Alt 2 Index 308.1
Minimum Width of
2-Lane Overcrossing
(Boldface
Standards) (E)
The minimum width of 2-
lane overcrossing structures
shall not be less than 32 feet
face of curb to face of curb.

Clawiter Rd overcrossing
structure:
(P) No Change
(E) 28’
High Standard curb to curb
distance would require
bridge widening. No
proposed modifications to
Clawiter Rd overcrossing.

Widening will not likely
be approved due to age of
structures.

Alt 1 Index 308.1:

Minimum Width of
2-Lane Overcrossing
(Boldface
Standard€(E)
The minimum width for twolane overcrossing structures
at interchanges shall be
40 feet curb-to-curb
Clawiter Rd overcrossing
structures:
(P) No Change
(E) 28’
High Standard curb to curb
distance would require
bridge widening. No
proposed modifications to
Clawiter Rd overcrossing.

Widening will not likely
be approved due to age of
structures.

Alt 1
Alt 2
Index 309.1:

Minimum
Horizontal
Clearances
(Boldface
Standards) (P)
The minimum horizontal
clearance to all objects, shall
be equal to the standard
shoulder width of the
highway facility as stated in
Table 302.1. A minimum
clearance of 4 feet shall be
provided where the standard
shoulder width is less than 4
Horizontal clearance from
edge of traveled way to
concrete barrier on
eastbound SR 92 on-ramp
below the Clawiter Rd
overcrossing:
(P) 7.5’
(E) 10’
(S) 10’
High Standard horizontal
clearance would require
reconstruction of Clawiter
O/C overcrossing.
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 39 Alternative
Design Standard
from Highway
Design Manual
Standard Design
Requirement
Location/
Description
(P) – Proposed
(E) – Existing
(S) - Standard
Probability of
Nonstandard Design
Feature Approval
(None, Low,
Medium, High)
Justification for
Probability Rating
Alt 2
Alt 2
Alt 2
Alt 3
feet. Approach rail
connections to bridge rail
may require special treatment
to maintain the standard
shoulder width.

Horizontal clearance from
edge of traveled way to
concrete barrier on
westbound SR 92 below
the Clawiter Rd
overcrossing:
(P) 6’
(E) 2’
(S) 10’
Horizontal clearance from
edge of traveled way to
concrete barrier on
westbound SR 92 off-ramp
below the Clawiter Rd
overcrossing:
(P) 4’
(S) 8’
Horizontal clearance from
edge of traveled way to
concrete barrier on
westbound SR 92 below
the San Francisco Bay
Trail pedestrian
overcrossing:
(P) 1.5’
(E) 10’
(S) 10’
High
High
Low
Standard horizontal
clearance would require
reconstruction of San
Francisco Bay Trail
overcrossing.

Alt 1
Alt 2
Index 309.2:

Vertical Clearances
Freeways and Expressways,
All construction except
overlay projects – 16 feet 6
Clawiter Rd overcrossing:
(P) No Change
(E) 15’-3” EB SR 92
Medium Existing conditions, no
proposed replacement of
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 40 Alternative
Design Standard
from Highway
Design Manual
Standard Design
Requirement
Location/
Description
(P) – Proposed
(E) – Existing
(S) - Standard
Probability of
Nonstandard Design
Feature Approval
(None, Low,
Medium, High)
Justification for
Probability Rating
(Boldface
Standards) (E)
inches shall be the minimum
vertical clearance over the
roadbed of the State facility
(e.g., main lanes, shoulders,
ramps, collector-distributor
roads, speed change lanes,
etc.).
(E) 15’-5” WB SR 92 Clawiter Rd overcrossing
or lowering of SR 92.

Alt 1
Alt 1
Alt 2
Alt 3
Index 501.3:

Interchange Spacing
(Boldface
Standards) (E)
The minimum interchange
spacing shall be one mile in
urban areas, two miles
outside of urban areas, and
two miles between freewayto-freeway interchanges and
other interchanges.

Spacing westbound SR 92
between Industrial Blvd
and Clawiter Rd:
(P) No Change (E) 0.65
mi
Spacing eastbound SR 92
between Whitesell St and
Industrial Blvd:
(P) 0.81 mi (E) 0.65 mi
Spacing between Whitesell
St and Industrial Blvd:
(P) 0.81 mi (E) 0.65 mi
Spacing between Whitesell
St and Industrial Blvd:
(P) 0.81 mi (E) 0.65 mi
High
High
High
High
Maintaining or improving
existing condition
Alt 1 Index 502.2:

Partial Interchanges
(Boldface
Standards) (E)
Isolated off-ramps or partial
interchanges shall not be
used because of the potential
for wrong-way movements
(P) Westbound SR 92
ramps on Clawiter Rd
create a partial interchange.
(E) Cloverleaf interchange
at Clawiter Rd.

Medium Maintaining existing
access condition for
westbound SR 92 ramps,
standard interchange on
Clawiter would require
realignment of the local
roadway and right-of-way
acquisition.
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 41 Alternative
Design Standard
from Highway
Design Manual
Standard Design
Requirement
Location/
Description
(P) – Proposed
(E) – Existing
(S) - Standard
Probability of
Nonstandard Design
Feature Approval
(None, Low,
Medium, High)
Justification for
Probability Rating
Alt 1
Alt 1
Alt 2
Alt 2
Alt 3
Index 504.3:

Distance Between
Ramp Intersection
and Local Road
Intersection
(Boldface
Standards) (E)
The minimum distance (curb
return to curb return)
between ramp intersections
and local road intersections
shall be 400 feet.

Intersection spacing
between westbound SR 92
ramps and Breakwater Ct
along Breakwater Ave:
(P) No Change (E) 60’
Intersection spacing
between westbound SR 92
ramps and Whitesell St
along Clawiter Rd:
(P) 260’ (E) 300’
Intersection spacing
between westbound SR 92
ramps and Bay Center Pl
along Whitesell St:
(P) 330’ (E) 60’
Intersection spacing
between eastbound SR 92
ramps and Whitesell St
along Clawiter Rd:
(P) 250’ (E) 300’
Intersection spacing
between eastbound SR 92
ramps and Whitesell St
along Clawiter Rd:
(P) 240’ (E) 300’
High
High
High
High
High
Existing condition,
standard intersection
spacing would require
realignment of the local
roadway network and
right-of-way acquisition.

Improving the existing
condition in most
locations.

Alt 1 Index 504.7
Weaving Sections
(Boldface
Standards) (E)
Between interchanges, the
minimum entrance ramp-toexit ramp spacing, measured
as shown on Figures 504.2A
Weaving distance on
westbound SR 92 between
Industrial Blvd and
Clawiter Rd:

High Improving existing
weaving distance between
interchanges
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 42 Alternative
Design Standard
from Highway
Design Manual
Standard Design
Requirement
Location/
Description
(P) – Proposed
(E) – Existing
(S) - Standard
Probability of
Nonstandard Design
Feature Approval
(None, Low,
Medium, High)
Justification for
Probability Rating
Alt 2
and 504.2B shall be 2,000
feet in urban areas, 5,000 feet
outside urban areas, and
5,000 feet between freewayto-freeway interchanges and
other interchanges.
(P) No Change (E)
1100’
Weaving distance on
westbound SR 92 between
Industrial Blvd and
Whitesell Rd:
(P) 1885’ (E) 1100’
Alt 1 Index 504.8:

Access Rights
Opposite Ramp
Terminals
(Boldface
Standards) (E)
For new construction or
major reconstruction, access
rights shall be acquired on
the opposite side of the local
road from ramp terminals to
preclude driveways or local
roads within the ramp
intersection.
76 gas station driveway at
Breakwater Ave inside
Caltrans R/W.

High Existing Condition
Alt 1 Index 504.8
Access Rights
Opposite Ramp
Terminals
(Boldface
Standards) (E)
For new construction or
major reconstruction, access
rights shall be acquired on
the opposite side of the local
road from ramp terminals to
preclude driveways or local
roads within the ramp
intersection.

SR 92 ramp terminals at
Clawiter Rd share
intersection with
Breakwater Ave.

High Existing condition
Alt 1
Alt 2
Index 202.5
Superelevation
Transition
(Underline
Standards) (P)
A superelevation transition
should be designed in
accordance with the diagram
and tabular data shown in
Figure 202.5A to satisfy the
requirements of safety,
comfort and pleasing
appearance.

Tangent length between
reversing curves on SR 92
eastbound off-ramp to
Whitesell St:
(P) 275’
Tangent length between
reversing curves on SR 92
High
High
The rate if change of the
cross slope has been
limited to 6 percent per
100 feet.
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 43 Alternative
Design Standard
from Highway
Design Manual
Standard Design
Requirement
Location/
Description
(P) – Proposed
(E) – Existing
(S) - Standard
Probability of
Nonstandard Design
Feature Approval
(None, Low,
Medium, High)
Justification for
Probability Rating
Alt 2
Alt 3
Alt 3
eastbound off-ramp to
Whitesell St:
(P) 200’
Tangent length between
reversing curves on SR 92
westbound off-ramp to
Whitesell St:
(P) 50’
Tangent length between
reversing curves on SR 92
eastbound off-ramp to
Whitesell St:
(P) 225’
Tangent length between
reversing curves on SR 92
westbound off-ramp to
Whitesell St:
(P) 205’
High
High
High
Alt 1
Alt 2
Alt 1
Alt 2
Alt 1
Index 204.4
Vertical Curve
Length
(Underline
Standards) (P)
For algebraic grade
differences of 2 percent and
greater, and design speeds
equal to or greater than 40
miles per hour, the minimum
length of vertical curve in
feet should be equal to 10V,
where V = design speed.
[450’ for 45 mph]
Sag curve on proposed SR
92 eastbound on-ramp from
Whitesell St:
(P) 200’
(S) 450’
Sag Curve south of existing
Clawiter Rd OC:
(P) 300’
(E) 300’
(S) 450’
Medium
Medium
Standard vertical curve
would require
reconstruction of Clawiter
Rd overcrossing.

Standard vertical curve
would require
reconstruction of Clawiter
Rd overcrossing.
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 44 Alternative
Design Standard
from Highway
Design Manual
Standard Design
Requirement
Location/
Description
(P) – Proposed
(E) – Existing
(S) - Standard
Probability of
Nonstandard Design
Feature Approval
(None, Low,
Medium, High)
Justification for
Probability Rating
Alt 2
Alt 1
Alt 2
Alt 3
Alt 1
Alt 2
Alt 3
Sag Curve north of existing
Clawiter Rd OC:
(P) 300’
(E) 300’
(S) 450’
Crest Curve on proposed
Whitesell St OC:
(P) 400’
(S) 450’
Sag Curve north of
proposed Whitesell St OC:
(P) 250’
(S) 450’
Medium
Medium
Medium
Standard vertical curve
would require
reconstruction of Clawiter
Rd overcrossing.

Standard vertical curve
would require significant
raising of the Eden
Landing Rd and Clawiter
Rd intersection and
approach roadways.

Additionally, the
intersection at Bay Center
Pl would need to be
raised.

Alt 1
Alt 2
Alt 3
Index 304.1
Side Slope Standards
(Underline
Standards) (P)
For new construction,
widening, or where slopes
are otherwise being
modified, embankment (fill)
slopes should be 4:1 or
flatter.

Slopes will likely be
steeper than 4:1 in some
areas to conserve right of
way.

High Standard side slopes
would increase right of
way impacts or would
require additional
retaining walls.

Alt 2
Alt 3
Index 310.2:

Outer Separation
(Underline
Standards) (P)
In urban areas and in
mountainous terrain, the
width of the outer separation
should be a minimum of 26
feet from edge of traveled
way to edge of traveled way.

Outer separation from
westbound SR 92 on-ramp
from Whitesell St to
Breakwater Ave:
(P) 14’ (E) 16’
High Standard outer separation
would increase right of
way impacts from
realigning Breakwater
Ave.

Alt 1 Index 504.2:

Ramp Entrance and
Exit Standards
(Underline
Standards) (E)
Design of freeway entrances
and exits should conform to
the standard designs
illustrated in Figure 504.2AB (single lane), and Figure Existing westbound SR 92
on-ramp from Clawiter Rd
does not follow this figure.

Medium Existing condition,
standard ramp would
require reconstruction of
Clawiter Rd overcrossing.
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 45 Alternative
Design Standard
from Highway
Design Manual
Standard Design
Requirement
Location/
Description
(P) – Proposed
(E) – Existing
(S) - Standard
Probability of
Nonstandard Design
Feature Approval
(None, Low,
Medium, High)
Justification for
Probability Rating
504.3K (two-lane entrances
and exits) and/or Figure
504.4 (diverging branch
connections), as appropriate.

Alt 3 Index 504.3:

Distance Between
Ramp Intersection
and Local Road
Intersection
(Underline
Standards) (E)
The preferred minimum
distance should be 500 feet.

Intersection spacing
between westbound SR 92
ramps and Bay Center Pl
along Whitesell St:
(P) 430’ (E) 60’
High Improving existing
condition, preferred
intersection spacing would
require realignment of the
local roadway network
and right-of-way
acquisition.
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 46 D. Aesthetic Treatments/Architectural Features
Within the project area, there are two existing architectural features along or adjacent to the SR 92 mainline: Breakwater Avenue Pedestrian Overcrossing and Clawiter Rd Overcrossing. To provide a consistent corridor aesthetic, proposed bridge structures, sound walls, and retaining walls aesthetic treatment will be consistent and preapproved by the District 4 Caltrans Office of Landscape Architecture. Additionally, new overpass railing/fencing, slope paving, and other architectural features are to be in line with other features along the corridor. A Wall/Barrier Aesthetic Report will be completed in the PA&ED phase.

The City of Hayward would like to provide additional aesthetic treatments, as this interchange is a gateway into the city on eastbound SR 92. These treatments have yet to be determined and will be explored further in the PA&ED phase.

E. Pavement Structural Section
The pavement structural section for the proposed local road and ramps will be studied further in the PA&ED phase via a Life Cycle Cost Analysis in close coordination with the Caltrans Office of Materials and Pavement.

Rehabilitating existing pavement utilized for the project will be considered to maintain consistency of all pavement surfaces within the project limits.

F. Alternatives Considered but Determined Not Viable
The following alternatives were developed during the course of the Alternative Analysis study or identified through stakeholder interaction. The alternatives were evaluated and have been removed from further study with the exception of all roundabout alternatives which were included for evaluation in the Step 1 ICE process.

A brief description of each alternative and the reasoning for removal from consideration as a viable alternative are provided below.

New Clawiter Road Overcrossing
The existing Clawiter Road overcrossing structure would be replaced with a new structure to accommodate all modes of travel including bicycle and pedestrian paths.

The interchange configuration would remain with changes only to incorporate Complete Street elements. The intersection distance between Breakwater Avenue and Clawiter Road would not be improved and there would still be a queuing concern backing onto Breakwater Avenue. Access to the industrial parcels located within the HITIC from SR 92 would not be improved.

To raise the new overcrossing structure to meet the minimum vertical clearance over SR 92 of 16.5 feet, the Clawiter Road profile would be required to be raised also.

There are high-voltage transmission lines crossing over Clawiter Road 130 feet south 04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 47 of the existing overcrossing structure. Raising the profile would result in a conflict with the existing transmission towers, requiring them to be raised or relocated to maintain the minimum 30-foot clearance required with these type of transmission lines. The new structure would be larger than the existing overcrossing structure which would require additional right-of-way to the north and south of SR 92. The westbound SR 92 on-ramp would also have reduced storage capacity from the widening of Clawiter Road to provide multimodal movements in both directions.

Adjustment or relocation of the existing electrical high-voltage transmission lines is considered a fatal flaw because it would be both disruptive and cost prohibitive. The alternative also does not meet the purpose and need. Therefore, this is not a viable alternative and should be eliminated from further consideration and not advance into the PA&ED phase of the project.

Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI)
The SR 92 access from Clawiter Road would be directed to Whitesell Street with a SPUI interchange configuration on a new Whitesell Street overcrossing structure. The SPUI interchange configuration would increase the local intersection spacing, improving traffic operations. The multimodal accommodations for bicycle and pedestrian movements would not be ideal due to longer paths of travel to cross over SR 92 along Whitesell Street. Structure costs for a SPUI configuration would be excessively high, including a deep structure depth. The larger structure would also require the profile to be higher than other alternatives considered to provide a standard minimum vertical clearance, resulting in higher and longer retaining walls to conform with the intersection of Eden Landing Road/Clawiter Road/Whitesell Street.

The alternative does not meet the project purpose and need and should be eliminated from further consideration and not advance into the PA&ED phase of the project.

Diverging Diamond Interchange
The SR 92 access from Clawiter Road would be directed to Whitesell Street with a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) configuration on a new Whitesell Street overcrossing structure. The DDI configuration would increase the local intersection spacing, resulting in improved traffic operations. The skew would also be improved compared to the existing Clawiter Road overcrossing structure with SR 92 to increase the local intersection spacing. Multimodal accommodations for bicycle and pedestrian movements would not be ideal due to multiple crossings with SR 92 ramp traffic and increased paths of travel. The alignment curvature to develop the envelope of the DDI and conform with the existing Whitesell Street would not be ideal given the high truck traffic volumes combined with steep profile grades to cross over SR 92. This combination and alignment curvature would result in potential truck overturning concerns. Reversing curvature would also result in nonstandard stopping sight distance features.
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 48 The alternative does not meet the project purpose and need and should be eliminated from further consideration and not advance into the PA&ED phase of the project.

Partial Cloverleaf and Diamond Interchange
The SR 92 access from Clawiter Road would be directed to Whitesell Street with a partial cloverleaf configuration for the westbound ramp terminal intersection and a diamond interchange configuration for the eastbound ramp terminal intersection. The interchange SR 92 access would be on a new Whitesell Street overcrossing structure.

The partial cloverleaf configuration for the westbound ramps would allow the existing Breakwater Avenue local road connection to remain. The westbound SR 92 off-ramp to Whitesell Street would back up onto the mainline onto the auxiliary lane during peak periods with limited ramp storage capacity. There would also be nonstandard access control with Breakwater Avenue across from the westbound on and off-ramps at the ramp terminal intersection. The local intersection spacing with the westbound ramp terminal intersection and the Bay Center Place/Whitesell Street intersection would be approximately 200 feet.

The alternative does not meet the project purpose and need and should be eliminated from further consideration and not advance into the PA&ED phase of the project.

Roundabout Intersections
The SR 92 access from Clawiter Road would be directed to Whitesell Street with a diamond interchange configuration with multilane roundabout intersections. The Caltrans Design functional group also provided a preliminary roundabout intersection configuration with single lane roundabouts located in the existing loop on-ramps at Clawiter Road. The existing Clawiter overcrossing would be demolished and Clawiter Road traffic would be directed to Whitesell Street with a new Whitesell Street overcrossing structure. Both the multilane and the Caltrans single lane roundabout intersection configurations have similar deficiencies at this project site.

The roundabout concepts would not improve traffic flow, reduce traffic congestion, or enhance safety due to the small local intersection spacing. The westbound SR 92 ramp terminal intersection is located in close proximity (less than 200 feet) to an adjacent signalized intersection and ramp metering signals; any potential queues extending back from the on-ramp metering and downstream signalized intersections could spill into the roundabout and disrupt its performance. Additionally, the profile grades along Whitesell Street would be greater than 4 percent at the roundabout intersections, resulting in truck overturning concerns which is not ideal for the predominant heavy truck traffic volumes in the western portion of the city. The roundabouts would also provide significantly less length between the ramp terminals and SR 92 meaning that many non-standard crest and sag curves would be required to get the ramps down to the meet the grade of the mainline profile. More details about 04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 49 the traffic operations of the Roundabout Intersection alternatives are provided in the ICE Step 1.

The alternative does not meet the project purpose and need and should be eliminated from further consideration and not advance into the PA&ED phase of the project.

Single Rotary Interchange
The SR 92 access from Clawiter Road would be directed to Whitesell Street with a single rotary intersection configuration. This configuration would ideally address intersection spacing with local intersections, but the layout at this location does not achieve that outcome with the Clawiter Road/Eden Landing Road/Whitesell Street intersection. The required profile and size of the rotary causes the westbound SR 92 off-ramp and the eastbound SR 92 on-ramp to be in conflict with the existing highvoltage electrical transmission lines. The minimum vertical clearance with electrical transmission lines of this voltage is 30 feet and only 15 feet clearance is achievable.

Adjustment or relocation of the existing high-voltage electrical transmission lines is considered a fatal flaw because it would be both disruptive and cost prohibitive. The alternative also does not meet the purpose and need. Therefore, this is not a viable alternative and should be eliminated from further consideration and not advance into the PA&ED phase of the project.

Whitesell Street Underpass with SR 92
The existing SR 92 eastbound ramps on Clawiter Road/Eden Landing Road would be reconfigured to a new partial diamond interchange with a signalized ramp terminus intersection on Whitesell Street. Whitesell Street would be extended with an underpass below SR 92 with a structure on the mainline and over Breakwater Avenue. The underpass would improve the profile grades and maintain the existing Breakwater Avenue access. There are SLR impacts within the project study area near the western limits of the project which would be worsened with an underpass design.

According to the Caltrans Climate Change Vulnerability assessment maps, the west side of the project study area from the Clawiter Road overcrossing will be affected by

1.75 meters of SLR. The underpass would therefore become an SLR issue which would not be aligned with the climate change approach by the City and other regional agencies. The design which does not consider climate change appropriately is a fatal flaw for this project.

The alternative does not meet the project purpose and need and should be eliminated from further consideration and not advance into the PA&ED phase of the project.

8. RIGHT-OF-WAY
A. Right-of-Way
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 50 The Build Alternative Right of Way Conceptual Cost Estimate (RWCCE) is included in Attachment H. There are right-of-way impacts anticipated for all alternatives due to the layout configuration, resulting in right-of-way acquisition. All other right-ofway impacts are related to utilities.

Access control is anticipated to be maintained at Breakwater Court across from the westbound ramp terminal intersection if the Build Alternative 1 progresses to the PS&E phase.

B. Utilities
During the PA&ED phase through the utility verification process, all existing utilities impacted will be assessed and the project team will coordinate with utility owners to identify potential utility conflicts. Positive location will be performed during the design phase, as reasonably required, or an exception to this policy will be established. The following is a list of the public utility companies within the project limits and their associated utility, as shown in parentheses. All utilities will be reassessed in the PA&ED phase for conflicts with the Build Alternatives, including:
• Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District • Alameda County Water District (Water)
• AT&T (Telephone)
• City of Hayward (Water, Sewer)
• Comcast (Television)
• Oro Loma Sanitary District (Sewer)
• PG&E (Gas, Electric)
It is anticipated that utility relocations will be required for the Build Alternatives, which include PG&E low-voltage overhead power poles and lines crossing Whitesell Street and Breakwater Avenue, streetlights, and traffic signals. For Build Alternatives 2 and 3, overhead telephone lines crossing near the intersection of Breakwater Court and Clawiter Road are anticipated to require utility relocation as well. Additionally, several underground sewer, water, and gas lines, and their respective maintenance holes, may require adjustment to final grade.

The Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District does not have any known facilities that are in conflict with improvements located within the vicinity of the project study area. Therefore, it is not anticipated that any facilities or structures owned and operated by the district will be impacted by the project. Any impacted existing or planned facilities would be coordinated with the district during the PA&ED phase.

As stated above, in the PA&ED phase of the project, the design team will confirm impacts with the utility owners through the utility verification process. Positive 04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 51 location, as prescribed in Chapter 17 of the Project Development Procedures Manual, will be performed, as required, either prior to or concurrent with the design phase.

C. Railroad
There are no railroad crossings within the project limits. It is not anticipated that the Build Alternatives will have railroad impacts, and it is assumed there will be no railroad agreement. There are two railroad crossing locations adjacent to the project limits: the first is to the east of the project area along SR 92, where an overhead structure over the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) exists, while the second railroad crossing is an at-grade UPRR rail crossing with Clawiter Road to the north of the project area.

D. Airspace Freeway Lease Areas
There is one airspace freeway lease area located within the project limits. The following is the location detailing the street, city, and post mile of the area:
• Breakwater Avenue, Hayward, CA, Parcel No. FLA-04-ALA-92-01 – Post Mile

4.0 It is not anticipated the Build Alternatives will impact this airspace freeway lease area. In the PA&ED phase, this will be further assessed for impacts and if any new areas are determined to be impacted, the project team will coordinate with Caltrans Right-of-Way Airspace.

9. STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT
The following key stakeholders have been identified for this project and consist of representatives from the following agencies/companies:
• City of Hayward
• Caltrans
• Alameda CTC
The City, Caltrans, and their partner agencies are supportive of this project and have participated in the development and review throughout the PSR-PDS process.

As part of the project initiation phase, a high-level evaluation of nine alternative concepts that address the project purpose and need was conducted. These concepts were analyzed and screened for benefits, disadvantages, and fatal flaws as described in Section 7.F. The three recommended alternatives that addressed the project purpose and need without identified fatal flaws were brought forth to City of Hayward at the June 28th, 2023 City Council Infrastructure Committee meeting, 04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 52 where comments were taken from both the committee members and the public.

Feedback received from the committee included:
• Desire for Class IV bike lanes to increase safety in the interchange. • Request to consider constructing an undercrossing instead of an overcrossing. • Highlighted that aesthetics will be important for an overcrossing structure as a gateway to the City.

During the PA&ED phase at the minimum, the following stakeholders will be engaged to help develop the project components:
• City of Hayward
• Caltrans
• County of Alameda
• Alameda CTC
Public Engagement
The project area is considered a priority community that experiences transportation and environmental burdens at a higher rate than other communities. CalEnviroScreen

4.0 is a comprehensive screening methodology that combines multiple environmental, health, and socioeconomic indicators to produce an overall score for each census tract in California. The area north and south of SR 92, including the majority of the City’s HITIC, is considered a disadvantaged community according to this screening methodology and Senate Bill (SB) 535, which assesses and identifies California climate investments to benefit disadvantaged communities. The CalEnviroScreen 4.0 percentile is 74% (greater than the threshold of 39.34% to be considered disadvantaged) and the pollution burden is 80%. Asian Americans make up the majority of the census tract population with 48.29% of the current residents in this defined disadvantage community. Providing improved multimodal connections from the San Francisco Bay Trail and office/business centers will be vital to connecting this community in the industrial/western portion of the City.

A Public Engagement Plan (Plan) will be developed in PA&ED phase to help ensure the City, in partnership with Caltrans, proactively communicates key project benefits and concerns and to achieve stronger ties, understanding, and communication with the public and with partner agencies/stakeholders. This Plan aims to inform the public and key stakeholders by enhancing communications and outreach around key project milestones.

It is anticipated that the project development will include public engagement meetings and public information campaigns, in varying media, so the public may learn about the project and its proposed improvements. Public in-person/virtual forums will be hosted, and information will be provided online to educate the public.

The public will have the opportunity to submit their feedback or comments during the environmental phase.
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 53 The Draft Environmental Document will be circulated for public review during the PA&ED phase.

10. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
A Preliminary Environmental Analysis Report (PEAR) was prepared to determine the anticipated environmental issues and the required environmental document is included as Attachment F. The anticipated level of CEQA environmental document for the project is an Initial Study with Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND). As currently defined, the project does not appear to include elements that would result in significant and unavoidable impacts. A traffic analysis will be developed during the PA&ED phase to determine if the project would result in measurable and substantial induced VMT. If during the PA&ED phase the project scope changes or through the traffic analysis it is determined the project would result in measurable and substantial induced VMT, the appropriate level of CEQA document would be an EIR. It is anticipated that the Caltrans District 4 Office of Environmental Analysis will make the class of action determination that the NEPA environmental document type for this project would be a routine Environmental Assessment (EA).

The following technical reports determined from the PEAR should be prepared during the PA&ED phase to analyze potential environmental impacts under the Build Alternatives:
• Community Impact Assessment (environmental justice and equity evaluation, and 4(f) memorandum included)
• Standard Visual Impact Assessment
• Historic Property Survey Report
• Archaeological Survey Report
• Historic Resources Evaluation Report
• Location Hydraulic Study (Sea-Level Rise memorandum included) • Water Quality Assessment Report
• Storm Water Data Report
• Preliminary Geotechnical Report
• Paleontological Evaluation Report
• Initial Site Assessment
• Air Quality Report (Mobile Source Air Toxics and Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy Analyses included)
• Noise Study Report (Construction Noise Assessment and Construction Vibration Analysis included)
• Natural Environment Study – Minimal Impact
• Biological Assessment
• Aquatic Resources Delineation Report
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 54 It is anticipated that the following regulatory permits/approvals would be required for the proposed project:
• Caltrans Statewide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit
• Protected Tree Pruning or Removal Permit from the City of Hayward Protected Trees Ordinance (Section 10-15.20)
According to SLR maps from the San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development Commission (BCDC), the western portion of the project site is vulnerable to sea level rise ranging from 3 (low risk aversion) to 10 (extreme risk aversion) feet, the range expected after 2100. There is more information regarding SLR for this project in Section 6 under the subsection climate change.

The project site is near estuarine and marine wetlands located approximately 0.5 miles west of the SR 92 Clawiter/Whitesell interchange. None of the Build Alternatives include work within the area designated as estuarine and marine wetlands. Prior to the preparation of the Natural Environment Study (NES), an aquatic resources delineation will be necessary to ascertain if the aquatic features described above are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. and State. If the wetland is in fact jurisdictional and construction of the project would impact waters of the U.S. and State, the project may require mitigation and the following permits:
• San Francisco Bay RWQCB 401 Water Quality Certification Permit • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Section 404 Permit • 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW)
The project site is located outside of Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZs) and areas of wildfire concern. Therefore, the urbanized area surrounding the project site has a low risk for wildfire.

The project site is located in Census tract 4317.01, in block groups 060014371011 and 060014371014 identified in the Environmental Protection Agency’s 2024 Environmental Justice (EJ) screening data. Block group 060014371011 is in the 89th national percentile for minority populations and is therefore considered an EJ block group. In the PA&ED phase, the Community Impact Assessment will evaluate impacts for EJ and Equity.
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 55 11. FUNDING
The project PID phase has been funded by a combination of Alameda CTC Measure BB funding and City of Hayward local funds. It is anticipated that the subsequent project phases would seek funding from a combination of federal, state, regional and local funding sources, including Alameda CTC, Senate Bill 1 (SB1), and the State Route 238 LATIP (AB 1386). As per the LATIP, this project is prioritized to address the mainline system deficiencies along SR 92 at Clawiter interchange and was estimated to cost $52 million in 2007 dollars. Individual projects with independent utility and logical termini, if identified for this project, may proceed when funding sufficient to implement a project is identified. It has been determined that this project is eligible for Federal-aid funding. The PSR-PDS serves as a scoping document to program for the next phase of the project.

A. Capital Outlay Project Estimate
A programming-level cost estimate was developed for the project to help define the scope of work and identify viable project Build Alternatives. The escalated (2032) opinion of probable cost for the project, including support costs, right-of way, and construction, ranges from approximately $95.3 million to $233 million. There will be right-of-way acquisition necessary as part of this project for all Build Alternatives.

The total right-of-way cost component ranges from approximately $4.9 million to $43.3 million. The range of project costs is based on potential project alternatives and major areas of risk, with appropriate consideration for contingency. Estimated costs are subject to change as new and more detailed information becomes available.

The Capital Outlay Project Estimate is included as Attachment D and the RWCCE is included as Attachment H.

Table 11-1: Estimated Capital Project Costs
Range of Estimate Source of Funds
Construction Right-ofWay Construction Right-ofWay
Alternative 1:

Combined
Whitesell/
Clawiter
Interchange
$49.6M
$68.4M*
$3.8M TBD TBD
Alternative 2:

Diamond
Interchange
with Partial
Access
$71.5M
$98.6M*
$26.1M TBD TBD
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 56 Alternative 3:

Whitesell Street
Diamond
Interchange
$102.3M
$141.1M*
$33.9M TBD TBD
*Costs shown are escalated values per Attachment D
The level of detail available to develop these project cost estimates is only accurate within the above ranges and is useful for long-range planning purposes only. The capital outlay project estimates should not be used to program or commit stateprogrammed capital outlay funds.

B. Capital Outlay Support Estimate
The current estimated support costs for the PA&ED phase of this project range from approximately $4.0 million to $8.2 million. Escalated to the mid-point of the PA&ED phase (2025) these costs range from $4.5 million to $9.1 million, The Capital Outlay Project Estimate is included as Attachment D which includes the support cost estimate on the cover page of each alternative.

C. Cooperative Agreement
The executed Cooperative Agreement No. 04-2874 (September 19, 2022) between Caltrans and the City of Hayward authorized the development of the PSR-PDS. The approval of this PSR-PDS would serve as the authorized document for Caltrans to execute a new cooperative agreement with the City for the development of PA&ED phase.

12. DELIVERY SCHEDULE
Project Milestones Scheduled Delivery Date
(Month/Year)
PID APPROVAL April/2024
BEGIN PA&ED January/2025
DED/DPR CIRCULATION January/2027
COMPLETE PA&ED December/2027
BEGIN PS&E January/2028
COMPLETE PS&E June/2030
RIGHT-OF-WAY CERTIFICATION June/2030
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION April/2031
The anticipated funding fiscal year for construction is 2031/2032. 04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 57 13. RISKS
A risk register has been created as part of the PSR-PDS and is included as Attachment J. The risk register is an assessment of potential risks and project impacts that may occur in subsequent phases and would be updated throughout the project development process. In accordance with the Caltrans Risk Management Handbook, a Level 3 risk register with probabilistic quantitative analysis is required for projects based on an estimated total project cost greater than $75 million. A quantitative assessment has been prepared for identified risks and the assignment of cost and schedule impacts are based on risk evaluation for this phase of the project.

As additional studies are completed as part of the PA&ED phase, a more detailed and quantitative approach to define and describe the risks can be completed.

In summary, the key risks included in the risk register are as follows:
• Cost increase due to supply and demand model and inflation • Approval of nonstandard features
• Traffic operational risks include approval of the traffic operational analysis for interchange modifications and ramp metering policy exceptions • Environmental risks include potential delay in technical studies • Construction risks include cultural or paleontological resources found during construction, hazardous materials in the vicinity of the site, interference with other projects in the vicinity, and weather impacts
• Organizational risks include lack of stakeholder support and local community objections
The approval from Caltrans of nonstandard features risk will continue to be assessed in the PA&ED phase of the project.

14. EXTERNAL AGENCY COORDINATION
The project requires the following coordination:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Department of the Army Permit
Clean Water Act Section 404
Regional Water Quality Control Board
Clean Water Act Section 401
Water Quality Certification
Caltrans
Agreements and project approval
04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 58 Other
Hayward – Tree Removal Permit
City of Hayward – Development Permit – Planning Division City of Hayward – Encroachment Permit
City of Hayward – Grading & Clearing Permit

15. PROJECT REVIEWS
Field Review Date
District Maintenance Monique Nguyen Date
District Traffic Safety Engineer Saif Mamoon Date
Headquarters Project Delivery Coordinator Richelle Perez Date Project Manager Val Ignacio Date
FHWA Lanh Phan Date
District Safety Review Haixiong Xu Date
Constructability Review Jeffrey Hupe Date
Other Date

16. PROJECT PERSONNEL
Agency & Role/Title Name Phone Number
Caltrans Project Manager Val Ignacio (510) 286-5086
Caltrans Design Morteza Azimi (510) 286-5157
Caltrans Advance Planning Warwick Cheung (510) 960-0894 Caltrans Advance Planning Mimy Hew (510) 960-0917
Caltrans Environmental Thomas Rosevear (510) 506-1508
Caltrans Right-of-Way Michael O’Callaghan (510) 529-5881 Caltrans Traffic Operations Rod Otto (510) 715-8867
Caltrans Office of Traffic Engineering Bahman Zarechain (510) 421-6292 Caltrans Pedestrian and Bicycle Gregory Currey (510) 821-0517 Caltrans Forecasting Phil Cox (510) 960-0903
Caltrans Maintenance Monique Nguyen (510) 286-4446
Caltrans HQ Sustainability Tony Dang (279) 234-2885
Caltrans D4 Sustainability Mark Leong (510) 960-0868
City of Hayward Project Manager Sheena Patel (925) 357-5071 City of Hayward Director of Public
Works
Alex Ameri (510) 583-4720
Kimley-Horn Project Manager Parag Mehta (925) 965-7703
Elite Transportation Group Traffic
Lead
Lin Zhang (510) 673-9656
Kimley-Horn Engineering Lead Sherina Lam (916) 859-3657 Kimley-Horn Deputy Project Manager Chris Brecheisen (925) 965-7706 Circlepoint Environmental Lead Arun Bird (925) 487-1766 04 - ALA - 92 – PM R3.9/R4.9
EA 04-0Y600 – ID 0422000307
February 2024
SR 92/Clawiter-Whitesell Interchange Upgrade Project – PSR-PDS 59 17. ATTACHMENTS
A. Location Map (1)
B. Vicinity Map (1)
C. Preliminary Layouts (3)
D. Capital Outlay Project Estimates (32)
E. Typical Cross Sections (10)
F. Preliminary Environmental Analysis Report (PEAR) (34) G. Traffic Engineering Performance Assessment (TEPA) (479) H. Right of Way Conceptual Cost Estimate (RWCCE) (15)
I. Transportation Planning Scoping Information Sheet (TPSIS) (20) J. Risk Register (2)
K. Storm Water Data Report (SWDR) (86)
L. Complete Streets Decision Document (CSDD) (6)
M. Vehicle-Miles Traveled Decision Document (VMTDD) (3) N. Transportation Management Plan (TMP) Data Sheet (15) O. Design Scoping Index (8)
P. PSR-PDS Survey Needs Questionnaire (1)
Q. HQ Design PSR-PDS Scoping Checklist (6)
CITY OF HAYWARD Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
File #: CONS 24-139
DATE: March 26, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Assistant City Manager

SUBJECT
Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Amend the Agreement with Bay Area Community Services (BACS) for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Hayward Navigation Center Operations for an Amount Not-toExceed $2,500,894

RECOMMENDATION
That the Council adopts a resolution (Attachment II) authorizing the City Manager to amend the agreement with Bay Area Community Services (BACS) for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Hayward Navigation Center (HNC) Operations for an Amount Not-to-Exceed $2,500,894.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment IIResolution
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 1 of 1 Printed on 3/22/2024
powered by Legistar™

Page 1 of 4 ends

DATE: March 26, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Amend the Agreement with Bay Area Community Services (BACS) for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Hayward Navigation Center Operations for an Amount Not-to-Exceed $2,500,894

BACKGROUND
In October 2018, Council declared a shelter crisis in Hayward, finding that the health and safety of the City’s growing homeless population is threatened by a lack of shelter.1 Since the declaration, Council has worked aggressively to address these health and safety concerns through multifaceted approaches. Additional information around local and regional efforts can be found in the May 23, 2023, report2 to Council. One of initiatives to support Hayward’s homeless community is to provide emergency and transitional shelter. The Hayward Navigation Center (HNC), operated by Bay Area Community Services (BACS), opened in November 2019 with a nightly bed capacity of 45. Currently, the HNC has a total capacity of 60 shelter beds. Due to the rising cost of operating a shelter, the HNC is facing a FY 2023-2024 funding gap of $70,164. Additional funding is required to support the ongoing operations through the end of the fiscal year. Staff is recommending the use of funding associated with the Distributor Settlement Agreement for Opioid Remediation to support the ongoing operations at the HNC through June 30, 2024.

1 October 2, 2018 Hayward City Council meeting:
https://hayward.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3690554&GUID=A8DF0FBF-2F19-4648-8632- 2BFE62A97107&Options=&Search= 3
2 May 23, 2023 Hayward City Council meeting:
https://hayward.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=6230209&GUID=B25EFB97-ADB4-45D7-BC5F0BC0EE034F45&Options=&Search=

Page 2 of 4 ends

DISCUSSION
BACS has been successfully operating the HNC since November 2019, providing outreach, housing navigation services, and flexible funds administration to individuals facing literal homelessness. Through Resolution Number 23-127, Council authorized the City Manager to negotiate and execute an agreement with BACS for FY 2023- 2024 HNC operations for an amount not-to-exceed $2,403,730. The funding sources for BACS’ FY 2023-2024 HNC operations agreement are outlined below in Table 1.

Table 1: FY 2023-2024 Hayward Navigation Center Contract Funding Source Amount
FY 2023-2024 General Fund $1,127,261
Permanent Local Housing Allocation $995,055
Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention $308,414
Total $2,403,730
Since its inception, BACS has operated the HNC and adapted their service delivery model in response to the Covid-19 pandemic and continues to be flexible while adjusting to the ongoing impacts, including the rising cost of food and staffing. In addition to maintaining IT infrastructure and security, unplanned facility maintenance at the HNC has increased in the last two years due to aging infrastructure. These expenses have contributed towards the rising cost to operate the shelter. Due to this, the estimated cost to operate the HNC through the end of the fiscal year, has risen to exceed Council’s authorized FY 2023-2024 award to BACS, in an amount of $70,164.

Available Funding to Support HNC Operations
On December 14, 20213, and March 28, 20234, Council approved the City’s participation in National Opioid Settlement litigation and authorized the City Manager to accept the terms of the California Allocation Agreement and to execute and submit all necessary settlement participation documents on behalf of the City.

On March 5, 20245, Council adopted Resolution Number 24-037, authorizing the City Manager or her designee to accept and appropriate $1,349,312 in funding associated with the Distributor Settlement Agreement for Opioid Remediation and to allocate the funds in accordance with eligible uses specified in the Agreement.

3 December 14, 2021, City Council Staff Report and Materials:
https://hayward.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5357661&GUID=EA7FE236-03F6-4186-9950- 9C8E558DA9BC&Options=&Search=
4 March 28, 2023, City Council Staff Report and Materials:
https://hayward.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=6105684&GUID=E37E2256-CAEF-4C2F-B45DB277122D5961&Options=&Search= 5 March 5, 2024, City Council Staff Report and Attachments:
https://hayward.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=6561052&GUID=355597DF-7504-4108-A4BCC67A50248439&Options=&Search=

Page 3 of 4 ends

The use of funds is restricted to following eligible uses, as specified in the Distributor Settlement Agreement:
 Opioid use prevention programs and services
 Support the treatment of opioid use disorder and any co-occurring substance use disorder or mental health conditions
 Support people in treatment and recovery from opioid use disorder and any cooccurring substance use disorder or mental health conditions, including wrap-around services like housing, transportation, education, job placement, job training, peer support, counseling, community navigators, case management, legal services, and connections to community-based services
 Provide connections to care for people who have or are at risk of developing opioid use disorder and any co-occurring substance use disorder or mental health conditions  Support efforts to discourage or prevent misuse of opioids  Support efforts to prevent or reduce overdose deaths or other opioid-related harms The City can utilize these funds to offset or supplement future expenses of existing programs, including the operations at the HNC. The HNC supports individuals experiencing homelessness with co-occurring substance use disorders by providing low-barrier respite, diverting individuals who are justice-involved or at-risk of being justice-involved into wraparound services, and helping to rapidly obtain permanent housing. These services in support of HNC clients who are recovering from Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) and any co-occurring Substance Use Disorder or Mental Health (SUD/MH) conditions would be an eligible use of funds.

Since June 2023, the City has received $186,656 through this settlement agreement. Staff recommends that Council authorize the City Manager to amend the FY 2023-2024 Agreement with BACS for HNC operations to allocate $70,164 in opioid settlement agreement funds, increasing the agreement to $2,500,894 to continue operations through the end of the fiscal year.

The proposed funding sources for BACS’ amended FY 2023-2024 HNC operations agreement are outlined in Table 2 below.

Table 2: Proposed FY 2023-2024 Hayward Navigation Center Contract Funding Source Amount
FY 2023-2024 General Fund $1,127,261
Permanent Local Housing Allocation $995,055
Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention $308,414
Opioid Settlement Agreement $70,164
Total $2,500,894
Staff are committed to finding alternative ongoing sources of funding to support homelessness initiatives and will provide updates as opportunities become available.

Page 4 of 4 ends

ECONOMIC IMPACT
There is a positive economic impact from reducing homelessness and poverty and moving individuals into permanent housing as part of the Hayward Navigation Center operations.

FISCAL IMPACT
This item has no associated fiscal impact to the General Fund. All funds associated with the referenced agreement have been previously appropriated by Council.

STRATEGIC ROADMAP
This agenda item supports the Strategic Priority of Preserve, Protect, and Produce Housing, under
 Project H2: Implement the Homelessness Reduction Strategic Plan

PUBLIC CONTACT
This item is related to the Let’s House Hayward (LHH) Strategic Plan, under Strategy 2.1.

Through the LHH process, Homebase, City staff, and partners throughout the Hayward community have worked together to engage a diverse set of stakeholders to inform the plan and strategy for Hayward moving forward.6

NEXT STEPS
Prepared by: Carol Lee, Management Analyst
Recommended by: Amy Cole-Bloom, Community Services Manager Regina Youngblood, Assistant City Manager
Approved by:
______________________________________
Kelly McAdoo, City Manager

6 For more information on the Let’s House Hayward! Strategic Plan process, please visit https://www.haywardca.gov/lets-house-hayward

ATTACHMENT II

Page 1 of 3 ends

HAYWARD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 24-____
Introduced by Council Member __________

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO AMEND THE

AGREEMENT WITH BAY AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES (BACS) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 HAYWARD NAVIGATION CENTER (HNC) OPERATIONS FOR AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $2,500,894
WHEREAS, the City of Hayward opened the Hayward Navigation Center (HNC) on November 18, 2019; and
WHEREAS, the City issued a Request for Information (RFI) from nonprofit social service providers interested in operating a HNC on January 23, 2019; and WHEREAS, a panel of reviewers was convened, comprised of staff from Community Services, Police Department, Planning, and Finance; and WHEREAS, staff unanimously recommended Bay Area Community Services (BACS) based on their relevant experience operating the similar Berkeley STAIR Center and providing a number of services to homeless individuals at locations in Hayward, the quality of their application, positive working relationship and flexibility in approach to service delivery, and their ability to quickly staff and operate the Navigation Center; and WHEREAS, BACS has been operating the HNC since November 2019; and WHEREAS, the Hayward City Council through Resolution 23-127, has authorized the City Manager to negotiate and execute an agreement with BACS for FY 2023-2024 HNC operations for an amount not-to-exceed $2,430,730; and
WHEREAS, the rising cost of operations has increased the estimated FY 2023-2024 HNC Operating Budget to $2,500,894; and
WHEREAS, an additional $70,164 is needed to continue operations at the HNC through June 30, 2024; and
WHEREAS, Council adopted Resolution Number 21-247, approving participation in the National Opioid Settlement litigation, accepting the terms of the California Allocation Agreement, and authorizing the City Manager to execute and submit all necessary settlement participation documents on behalf of the City; and

ATTACHMENT II

Page 2 of 3 ends

WHEREAS, Council adopted Resolution Number 23-067, approving participation in the National Opioid Settlement litigation with Teva, Allergan, CVS, Walmart, and Walgreens; accepting the terms of the California Allocation Agreement, and authorizing the City Manager to execute and submit all necessary settlement participation documents on behalf of the City; and
WHEREAS, under the terms of these Settlements, California is scheduled to receive up to nearly $4 billion, some of which will be distributed to cities and counties; and WHEREAS, by opting into these Settlements, the City anticipates receiving approximately $1,349,312 in annual installment payments through July 2038; and WHEREAS, Council adopted Resolution Number 24-037, authorizing the City Manager or her designee to accept and appropriate an amount not to exceed the 18-year estimate of $1,349,312 in funding associated with the distributor settlement agreement for opioid remediation and to allocate the funds in accordance with eligible uses specified in the distributor settlement agreement; and
WHEREAS, since June 2023, the City has received $186,656 through this Settlement Agreement; and
WHEREAS, BACS provides services at the HNC that are eligible uses specified in Exhibit E of the Distributor Settlement Agreement.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hayward hereby approve the use of $70,164 in funding associated with the Opioid Distributor Settlement Agreement to support the operations at the Hayward Navigation Center.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Hayward authorizes the City Manager or her designee to amend the FY 2023-2024 agreement between the City and Bay Area Community Services (BACS) for an amount not-to-exceed $2,500,894.

ATTACHMENT II

Page 3 of 3 ends

IN COUNCIL, HAYWARD, CALIFORNIA _______________________, 2024 ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MAYOR:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: ______________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Hayward
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________________
City Attorney of the City of Hayward
CITY OF HAYWARD Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
File #: CONS 24-142
DATE: March 26, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works

SUBJECT
Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for Construction Management for the Water Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF) Improvements - Phase II Project, Project Nos. 07749, 07760 and 07786, in an Amount Not-to-Exceed $949,625

RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopts a resolution (Attachment II) authorizing the City Manager to execute a professional services agreement (PSA) with Carollo Engineers in an amount not-to-exceed $949,625 for preconstruction construction management work for the WRRF Improvements - Phase II Projects, Project Nos. 07749, 07760 and 07786.

SUMMARY
The Water Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF, formerly WPCF) treats an average flow of approximately eleven million gallons per day (MGD) and meets current regulatory requirements for discharge of treated effluent to the deep waters of the San Francisco Bay. However, the current draft of the Regional Water Quality Control Board watershed permit, which is scheduled for adoption and planned to go into effect in August 2024, requires a 50% reduction in nutrients by 2034. In preparation to meet the new requirements, design is underway on improvements, with three separate construction bid packages planned for advertisement between late 2024 and late 2025. The proposed improvements include a new administration and laboratory building, relocated primary effluent equalization tanks, a new biological nutrient removal (BNR) process, a new grit removal facility, modifications to the existing solids contact tank, demolition of the functionally obsolete existing west trickling filter, and related ancillary facilities including pump stations, new aeration blower facilities, new process piping, and electrical infrastructure to support the new facilities. Due to the size, complexity, and specialized nature of the proposed improvements, staff requests that Council award the first phase of a contract for Construction Management services to Carollo Engineers.

ATTACHMENTS
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 1 of 2 Printed on 3/22/2024
powered by Legistar™
File #: CONS 24-142
Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 2 of 2 Printed on 3/22/2024
powered by Legistar™

Page 1 of 10 ends

DATE: March 26, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for Construction Management for the Water Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF) Improvements - Phase II Project, Project Nos. 07749, 07760 and 07786, in an Amount Not-to-Exceed $949,625

However, the current draft of the Regional Water Quality Control Board watershed permit, which is scheduled for adoption and planned to go into effect in August 2024, requires a 50% reduction in nutrients by 2034. In preparation to meet the new requirements, design is underway on improvements with three separate construction bid packages planned for advertisement between late 2024 and late 2025. The proposed improvements include a new administration and laboratory building, relocated primary effluent equalization tanks, a new biological nutrient removal (BNR) process, a new grit removal facility, modifications to the existing solids contact tank, demolition of the functionally obsolete existing west trickling filter, and construction of related ancillary facilities including pump stations, new aeration blower facilities, new process piping, and electrical infrastructure to support the new facilities. Due to the size, complexity, and specialized nature of the proposed improvements, staff recommend third party construction management services for the project, and requests that Council award the first phase of a contract for Construction Management services to Carollo Engineers.

Page 2 of 10 ends

BACKGROUND
The WRRF core infrastructure was originally constructed in 1952 to treat wastewater flows from the City’s residents and businesses prior to discharge into the San Francisco Bay. Over the years, the WRRF has undergone several major upgrades to meet more stringent discharge requirements, as well as increasing capacity as the City’s population and industry have grown. The WRRF now treats an average flow of approximately eleven million gallons per day (MGD) and meets current regulatory requirements for discharge of treated effluent to the deep waters of the San Francisco Bay (Bay). The existing treatment process, however, does not significantly remove nutrients from the wastewater flows.

Regulatory Requirements for Nutrient Reduction in Discharges to the Bay Continued nutrient loading in the Bay is a growing concern for the Bay Area water quality community. Recent data indicate an increase in algae biomass in many areas of the estuary, suggesting that the Bay’s resilience to the effects of nutrients may be declining due to a variety of contributing factors. These include natural oceanic oscillations that bring in colder waters to the Bay resulting in a reduction in the Bay’s clam population that feeds on algae. In addition, decreases in sediment inflows from mining operations and cleaner wastewater discharges have resulted in increased light penetration in the waters of the Bay, further contributing to algae growth. In the summers of both 2022 and 2023, harmful algal blooms occurred in the bay.

In response to growing concerns about nutrients and their impacts on the Bay, in May 2019, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Board) announced upcoming regulatory requirements limiting discharge of nutrients (nitrogen) to the Bay. Currently 37 publicly owned treatment works discharge treated effluent to the Bay, representing about 2/3 of the annual nitrogen loads to the Bay. In February of 2024, the Regional Water Quality Control Board released the Draft version of the 3rd Nutrients Watershed Permit. As currently written, this permit would require the East Bay Dischargers Authority (of which the City of Hayward is a member) to reduce nutrients by 50% by 2034. It is anticipated that Hayward’s share of the reduction would be 50%. Previously, under the 2nd Nutrients Watershed Permit, the City anticipated being required to reduce nutrients by 30%.

However, because of the harmful algal blooms of the past two summers, and based on preliminary feedback from the Water Board, the design had been progressing to be able to pivot to the more stringent 50% reduction requirement. Project costs presented in the December 12, 20231 council report requesting approval for authorizing the City Manager to apply for a Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) Loan anticipated the Water Board’s direction and ultimate decision to require a 50% load reduction.

1 https://hayward.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=6448360&GUID=CB5A4ECF-8AF0-49B8-B838-81002AFE119D&Options=&Search=

Page 3 of 10 ends

Project Planning
In 2018, the City hired Black and Veatch to prepare a Facilities Plan to address long term infrastructure needs at the WRRF. The Facilities Plan, completed in 2020, identified improvements needed to meet anticipated regulatory requirements and guide the WRRF infrastructure needs for the next 25 years. Notable recommendations from the facilities plan include new biological nutrient removal (BNR) basins, a new grit removal facility, a new final clarifier, and a new administration and laboratory building. Also required to facilitate construction of the BNR basins would be the relocation of the existing primary effluent equalization basin, which is currently located in the area planned for the BNR facilities.

In July of 2022, the City hired Brown and Caldwell to begin design of the key facilities identified in the Facilities Plan. This is being designed as three separate bid packages, which are described below.

Proposed Projects
The City intends to award three separate construction contracts for work related to biological nutrient removal, which are covered by this construction management contract.

1. WRRF New Administration Building and Laboratory – Project 612-07786: The existing Administration Building was originally constructed in 1970 and subsequently expanded in 1994 to accommodate increased laboratory space requirements. Since it was last modified, the WRRF has seen increased staffing levels due to increasing regulatory requirements, and consequently the existing facilities can no longer efficiently accommodate the space needs and functional requirements of daily operations. The project includes construction of a 22,000 square foot two-story administration/operations/laboratory building. This project is currently nearing the 100% design stage and is scheduled to bid in the fall of 2024. Construction is anticipated to last 24 months.

2. New Primary Effluent Equalization Tanks – Project No. 612-07749: The purpose of the Primary Effluent Equalization Basin (EQ Basin) is to store primary effluent when wet weather flows exceed the secondary treatment capacity at the plant. Currently, flows are automatically diverted to the existing EQ Basin when flows exceed the plant capacity. Most of the secondary treatment improvements identified in the Facilities Plan are sited in the location currently occupied by the existing EQ Basin. Therefore, the EQ Basin must be relocated to make room for the new treatment facilities. This project includes 2 new 1.5-million-gallon tanks, for a total storage of 3 million gallons.

The EQ Basins would be utilized when plant flows exceed 45 million gallons per day, as needed to allow downstream treatment basins to be taken offline for maintenance, and diurnally if desired to minimize variances in flow through the secondary treatment process to improve treated effluent water quality. Construction is anticipated to last 27 months.

Page 4 of 10 ends

3. Phase II Improvements – Project No. 612-07760: The Phase II Improvements Project would implement the required nutrient removal infrastructure. This would include new BNR basins, a new final clarifier, a new grit removal facility, rehabilitation of the two existing final clarifiers, demolition of the existing west trickling filter, and related ancillary facilities including pump stations, new aeration blower facilities, new process piping, and electrical infrastructure to support the new facilities. Construction is anticipated to last 42 months.

The total estimated construction cost for the entire project including the Administration Building, Primary Effluent Equalization Tanks, and the Phase II Project is estimated to be $245 million with a range of $189 to $360 million reflecting a range of accuracy in the estimate based on the design level of completion. A cost breakdown is summarized in Table 1. Note that the costs reflected in Table 1 are updated from the December 12, 2023 staff report which estimated the project cost to be $239 million with a range of $173 to $350 million. Costs are updated for the Administration Building and Primary Effluent Equalization Facility Projects reflecting an increased level of detail in the design packages of 90% and 60% complete, respectively.

The upcoming regulatory requirement and cost of implementing BNR facilities is not unique to the City. Other agencies are also implementing similar improvements including the City of Palo Alto (construction cost of $193 million), City of Sunnyvale (construction cost of $278 million), and Union Sanitary District (planning level cost $482 million for their secondary treatment upgrades).

DISCUSSION
The main goal of the Phase II Project is to construct improvements necessary for nutrient removal in compliance with the Water Board’s 3rd Nutrient Watershed Permit. During Construction, Carollo will work directly with the selected contractor to provide construction oversight and ensure the project remains on schedule and meets best practices.

Construction Management Scope of Services
At this time, staff is recommending award of Phase 1, which includes various preconstruction tasks. These tasks can help the City to identify potential cost savings, minimize the potential for change orders and claims, and plan ahead to ensure the WRRF remains operational throughout construction.

Phase 1 includes preconstruction work which includes the following tasks  Development of Construction Management procedures and risk registers for each of the three projects.
 Develop programmatic schedule comparing all 3 packages with each other and other concurrent projects at the WRRF to ensure that the WRRF can remain operational at all times, and that construction projects do not adversely impact each other.  Biddability and Constructability review for the 60% Design for the Phase II Project.

The Consultant will review the design for the Phase II improvements at the 60% level

Page 5 of 10 ends

to identify potential ambiguities and risks for the project to minimize the chance for changes and disputes.
 Biddability and Constructability review for the 100% Design for the Administration Building and Laboratory. The Consultant will review the design for the Administration Building and Laboratory at the 100% level to identify potential ambiguities and risks for the project to minimize the chance for changes and disputes.  90% Design review of the Phase II Project.
 Review of design consultant’s cost estimates.
 Perform contractor outreach and develop contractor prequalification documents.  Staffing study to determine the project’s long-term impacts on required staffing levels for the WRRF.
 Bidding services for all 3 packages include attendance at pre-bid meetings, communicating the provisions of the Community Workforce Agreement to prospective bidders, determining responsiveness of bidders, and responding to any bid protests.  Value Engineering for the Phase II Project: Identify potential cost savings for the Phase II project.

Phase 1 also includes an optional task, to be performed only if authorized by City staff:
 Constructability review of the final clarifiers rehabilitation.

Phases 2 through 4, to be awarded at future Council Meetings, would include construction management for each project.

Consultant Selection
On November 8, 2023, staff publicly issued a request for proposals on the City’s OpenGov platform. On December 19, 2023, the City received three proposals from 1) Black & Veatch; 2) Carollo Engineers; and 3) CDM Smith. Staff evaluated the three proposals using defined criteria, such as experience of the project team, experience with similar successful projects, knowledge and technical expertise, responsiveness to the scope of work, innovative ideas and approach, and appropriateness of level of effort given the project scope.

While each of the three teams are highly qualified for the project with outstanding qualifications and experience on similar projects, in staff’s view, Carollo Engineers’ proposed project team, qualifications, and responsiveness to the City’s scope of work was ranked as the best team to meet the City's needs. Carollo Engineers achieved a higher rating in the selection criteria by demonstrating a clear understanding of project challenges and solutions and proposing a knowledgeable and experienced project team that has worked together on similar projects for other agencies in the bay area. Carollo Engineers has completed several key projects for the City including the 2019 Headworks Bar Screens Project and the 2013 Cogeneration Systems Upgrade. Carollo also prepared a peer review of the WRRF Facilities Plan and is familiar with the proposed project. Carollo is also currently the construction management firm for similar improvements for the City of Palo Alto. As part of Carollo’s team, Kitchell CEM, is proposed as the Construction Manager for the Administration Building and Laboratory. Kitchell has previously served as construction manager on several City projects, including Fire Station 6.

Page 6 of 10 ends

Staff have reviewed the proposed scope of work and have negotiated a final scope of work and fee of $19,705,937 which includes a contingency of 6%. This fee will be broken out into four phases:

1. Phase 1 consists of preconstruction work for all 3 proposed bid packages. Including optional services, the total fee for this task is not to exceed $949,625.

2. Phase 2 consists of Construction Management for the Administration Building Project, with an anticipated construction period of 24 months. The total fee for this task is not to exceed $3,428,409 and, and will be awarded concurrently with the construction contract for this package.

3. Phase 3 consists of Construction Management for the Primary Effluent Equalization Facility, with an anticipated construction period of 27 months. The total fee for this task is not to exceed $3,400,815 and will be awarded concurrently with the construction contract for this package.

4. Phase 4 consists of Construction Management for the Phase 2 Improvements Project, with an anticipated construction period of 42 months. The total fee for this task is not to exceed $11,927,088 and will be awarded concurrently with the construction contract for this package.

The total construction cost is estimated to be $254 million with an estimated range varying between $189 million to $360 million based on the stage of design completeness and class of estimate as described in Table 1. The fee for the total construction management services including contingency is 7.3% of the estimated total construction cost for all three projects, which is reasonable given the scope of work and the nature of complicated retrofit projects.

Staff is requesting preconstruction services be awarded in the amount of $949,625. Although staff is requesting for award of preliminary design at this time, Carollo will also provide construction management services for each of the three projects. Staff will return to Council as each construction contract is awarded to award the corresponding construction management fee for each project, optional task items and contingency, with an ultimate not to exceed contract amount of $19,705,937. This ultimate not to exceed contract amount is based on the currently anticipated construction schedule and may be subject to change if the construction scheduled is delayed.

ECONOMIC IMPACT
The total estimated construction cost for the project at the planning stage was estimated to be between $125 and $169 million. The costs have been further adjusted during the design effort that is currently underway. The current estimated construction cost for the project is now estimated to be between $189 and $360 million (see summary of construction costs presented in Table 1). It is anticipated that these improvements will substantially impact, resulting in doubling of the current rates over the next ten years, sewer service rates and sewer connection fees. However, the extent to which rates will need to be adjusted cannot be determined with certainty at this point.

Page 7 of 10 ends

Table 1 – Estimated Construction Cost(1)(2)
Project Element Estimated Construction Cost
New Grit Facility $ 22.9 million
Range $16 - $34 million
New Primary Equalization (PE EQ) Tanks $28.8 million
Range $25 - $35 million
Nutrient Upgrades $134.1 million
Range $94 – 201 million
Existing Final Clarifiers Retrofits $26.8 million
Range 19 – 40 million
New Administration Building and
Laboratory
$34.8 million
Range $31 - $40 million
Site Waste Pump Station (SWPS)
Improvements
$1.5 million
Range 1.0 to 2.2 million
3W System Upgrades $4.7 million
Range 3.2 to 7.0 million
Total Estimated Construction Cost $254 million
Range $189 to $360 million
Notes:
(1) Soft costs including design, engineering services during construction, construction management, inspection, materials testing, etc. are not included in the above costs. (2) Range reflects the accuracy of the estimate based on the level of design at the preliminary design stage (Class 4) with a typical level of accuracy between -30% to +50%. The PE EQ Tanks is slightly more refined (Class 4) with a typical level of accuracy between -15% and +20%. The Administration Building and Laboratory estimate is more refined (Class 2) with a typical level of accuracy between -15% to +20%.

FISCAL IMPACT
Staff is requesting approval for professional services related to the preconstruction phase only at this time in the amount of $949,625. The total not-to-exceed professional services contract amount will be $19,705,937, and staff will return to Council for authorization at a later time. This is a multi-year contract that covers construction management through the completion of construction including startup assistance and training. This project is anticipated to take five years to complete.

The funding for this contract will be allocated from the Sewer Improvement Fund, 612-07660 (WRRF Phase II Improvement Project), 612-07749 (New Primary EQ Basin), and 612-07786 (WRRF New Administration Building & Lab Project). A total of $4.6 million is available in FY 2024 to cover the cost of this contract. Upon award of each construction contract, staff will return to Council to Authorize the corresponding phase of this construction management services contract.

Page 8 of 10 ends

Staff recently submitted a Letter of Intent to submit an application for Water Infrastructure Financing and Innovation Act (WIFIA) and intends to submit a formal application in summer of 2024. A WIFIA loan could fund 49% of the total project costs, including previously incurred costs such as design. WIFIA’s interest rate is currently around 4.3%.

Staff is also considering applying for a State Revolving Fund (SRF) loan, however the funding for this program has been very limited in recent years. The remainder of the project would primarily be funded through tax exempt municipal bonds, which are not yet issued. As the design progresses, the estimated project cost is expected to be adjusted, especially as construction costs become better defined in the future as the design is more complete. Staff continue to seek grants as well. Budget adjustments will be brought forward to Council through the annual budget approval process.

STRATEGIC ROADMAP
This agenda item supports the various goals of Council’s Strategic Roadmap. The WRRF Improvements Phase II Project will address infrastructure needs and improvements to increase the reliability of the City’s treatment plant, and construct process improvements to meet more stringent nutrient limits in accordance with upcoming regulatory requirements, while supporting the goals of the City Council. Specifically, this item relates to the implementation of the following projects:

Confront Climate Crises & Champion Environmental Justice.

Mitigate Climate Crisis Impacts through Resilient Design and Community Engagement Project C14b: Implement Shoreline Master Plan, including mitigating sea level rise in the industrial corridor through building requirements and outreach Invest in Infrastructure.

Invest in Water Supplies, Sanitation Infrastructure & Storm Sewers Project N19: Update Water Pollution Control Facility Phase II Plan

SUSTAINABILITY FEATURES
The WRRF Improvement Project Phase II will help maintain and improve the biology and health of the San Francisco Bay which is vital for the region and the State. The Phase II Project will also satisfy the nutrient removal requirements specified in the 3rd Watershed Permit to reduce nitrogen loads to the Bay.

The effects and risks of rising sea water levels have been reviewed and will be incorporated into the design of the new facilities.

The Administration Building and Laboratory will be reviewed by the Building Division for conformance with State and local requirements related to sustainability (i.e., California Building Code, California Energy Code, etc.) which require a minimal level of energy efficiency, resource conservation, material recycling, etc. In addition, the building will be designed and

Page 9 of 10 ends

constructed to meet Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) standards for a Silver Certification, or better. The Administration Building and Laboratory will also include a 75kW solar array in the parking lot to generate renewable energy.

PUBLIC CONTACT
As part of the funding process, an environmental study (CEQA and/or Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration) will be posted for public review and comment. In addition, a public hearing will be held to review the environmental study.

There is currently a web site hosted on the City’s website that posts periodic updates throughout the multi-year duration of the project. This will continue.

NEXT STEPS
If Council approves, staff will finalize a PSA with Carollo Engineers that authorizes the preconstruction services, followed by issuing a Notice to Proceed. Staff will return to Council for approval of the items listed below.

The following schedule has been developed for this project:

Award of Professional Services Agreement – Approval for Authorization of Preconstruction Services for the Phase II Project March 26, 2024
Approval of Environmental Study – CEQA IS/MND June 2024 Approval of Plans and Specifications and Call for Bids for the Administration Building
September 2024
Approval of Plans and Specifications and Call for Bids for the Primary Effluent Equalization Facility Project
September 2024
Award of Construction Contract and Construction Management Services for the Administration Building Project
November 2024
Award of Construction Contract and Construction Management Services for the Primary Effluent Equalization Facility Project November 2024
Execute WIFIA Loan January 2025
Approval of Plans and Specifications and Call for Bids for the Improvements Project – Phase II
April 2025
Award of Construction Contract and Construction Management Services for the Improvements Project - Phase II
August 2025
Primary Effluent Equalization Facility Project Construction Completion
July 2026
Administration Building Project Construction Completion October 2026 Improvements – Phase II Project Construction Completion January 2029

Page 10 of 10 ends

Prepared by: Kyle Carbert, Senior Utilities Engineer
Reviewed by: Suzan England, Utilities Engineering Manager Recommended by: Alex Ameri, Director of Public Works
Approved by:
__________________________________________
Kelly McAdoo, City Manager

ATTACHMENT II

Page 1 of 2 ends

HAYWARD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 24-____
Introduced by Council Member __________

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CAROLLO ENGINEERS, IN AN

AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED NINE HUNDRED FORTY-NINE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED AND TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($949,625) FOR CONSTRUCTION

MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE WATER RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY (WRRF) IMPROVEMENTS PHASE II PROJECT, PROJECT NOS. 07749, 07760 AND 07786
WHEREAS, the City of Hayward (City) owns and operates the Water Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF), which treats an average flow of approximately eleven million gallons per day; and
WHEREAS, on February 27, 2018, the City entered into an agreement with Black & Veatch Corporation to perform engineering services for the WPCF Phase II Facilities Plan, which serves as a comprehensive planning document for the WRRF infrastructure needs for the next twenty-five years; and
WHEREAS, on July 19, 2022, the City entered into an agreement with Brown and Caldwell to design the Phase II Improvements, which include a new administration and laboratory building, new primary effluent equalization tanks, a new biological nutrient removal system, a new grit facility, and ancillary facilities for which design is underway; and WHEREAS, increasing nutrient loadings to the Bay is a growing concern for the Bay Area water quality community, which has been discussed in both the first Nutrients Watershed Permit (issued 2014) and the Second Nutrients Watershed Permit (issued 2019); and
WHEREAS, on February 15, 2024, the Water Board issued a draft of the 3rd Nutrients Watershed Permit, which will be finalized and implemented by August 1, 2024, which would require the City to reduce nutrient loading to the bay by 50% by May 1, 2034; and WHEREAS, the future nitrogen limits necessitate the WRRF to upgrade the existing secondary process to reduce the nitrogen load in the wastewater discharge to the Bay; and WHEREAS, the main goal of the Phase II Project is to construct improvements necessary for nutrient removal in compliance with the Water Board’s 3rdNutrient Watershed Permit; and

ATTACHMENT II

Page 2 of 2 ends

WHEREAS, on November 8, 2023, staff issued a request for proposals (RFP) to award a contract for construction management services for the WRRF Phase II Project; and WHEREAS, in response to the RFP, the City received three (3) proposals and after objectively evaluating proposals, has determined that Carollo Engineers possesses the necessary experience and technical skills to perform the work; and WHEREAS, the City and Carollo Engineers have negotiated a not-to-exceed amount of nine hundred forty-nine thousand six hundred and twenty five dollars ($949,625) for preconstruction services for the WRRF Improvements - Phase II; and WHEREAS, staff will return to City Council for approval to award the remainder of the Construction Management Services in a not-to-exceed amount of nineteen million seven hundred and five thousand nine hundred and thirty seven ($19,705,937) for construction management services for each construction package including optional service tasks for the WRRF Improvements - Phase II.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hayward that the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute, on behalf of the City of Hayward, an agreement for professional services with Carollo Engineers for preconstruction services of the WRRF Improvements -Phase II, Project Nos. 07749, 07760 and 07786, in an amount not to exceed nine hundred forty nine thousand six hundred and twenty five dollars ($949,625) , in a form approved by the City Attorney.

IN COUNCIL, HAYWARD, CALIFORNIA _______________________, 2024 ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MAYOR:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: _____________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Hayward
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________________
City Attorney of the City of Hayward
CITY OF HAYWARD Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
File #: CONS 24-149
DATE: March 26, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works

SUBJECT
Adopt a Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Call for Bids for the Alves Street and Leighton Street Drainage Improvements, Project No. 07794

RECOMMENDATION
That the Council adopts a resolution (Attachment II) approving the plans and specifications, and calling for bids to be received on April 23, 2024, for the Alves Street and Leighton Street Drainage Improvements Project.

SUMMARY
This Project proposes drainage improvements by constructing a valley gutter at the intersection of Alves Street and Leighton Street. The Project will also include street pavement grading at the intersection to allow for more optimal drainage from the residential houses to the valley gutter. The project design has been completed and bid documents have been prepared. City staff is requesting Council’s approval of the plans and specifications and call for bids to be received on April 23, 2024.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
Attachment III Location Map
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 1 of 1 Printed on 3/22/2024
powered by Legistar™

Page 1 of 3 ends

DATE: March 26, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Call for Bids for the Alves Street and Leighton Street Drainage Improvements, Project No. 07794

BACKGROUND
The Streets Division of the Maintenance Services Department has received numerous complaints of rainwater flooding the frontage of the properties at the intersection of Alves Street and Leighton Street. After the January 2023 heavy rainfall season, the water began to pool up on the driveways raising concerns from the property owners that the water could eventually flood the houses. Public Works & Utilities staff have reviewed the issue and investigated options to address the problem.

The adopted FY24 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget includes a project budget appropriation of $250,000 (Fund 405) to address the concerns and develop a solution for the Alves Street and Leighton Street Drainage Improvements.

DISCUSSION
The as-built drawings of the area show the surface runoff was intended to collect at the intersection of Alves Street and Leighton Street and continue flowing down Leighton Street to a storm drain catch basin on Silva Avenue. Currently, the surface runoff collects

Page 2 of 3 ends

in front of driveways and gutters and does not continue flowing down Leighton Street.

Upon investigation, PW staff determined that the street pavement overlay process increased the street elevation over the years which prevented the runoff from flowing toward Leighton Street. This project will re-grade the intersection in addition to installing a valley gutter to help mitigate the surface runoff towards Leighton Street.

This project is categorically exempt for environmental review under Section 15302 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines for the replacement or reconstruction of an existing structure with the same size, purpose, and capacity.

ECONOMIC IMPACT

Improvements to the intersection will eliminate the need for the Streets Division to respond to neighborhood concerns and eliminate the need to use resources to frequently clean and maintain the area. The improvement of surface runoff will also prolong the life span of the sidewalk and roadway.

FISCAL IMPACT
The adopted FY 2024 CIP budget includes a project budget appropriation of $250,000 (Fund 405 – Capital Projects - Governmental) to address the concerns and develop a solution for the Alves Street and Leighton Street Drainage Improvements.

The estimated project costs are as follows:

Construction Contract $138,000
Contingencies 27,000
Design and Administration 35,000
Inspection, Survey, and Testing 50,000
TOTAL $250,000

STRATEGIC ROADMAP
This agenda item supports the Strategic Priority of Invest in Infrastructure, though not a specific project.

SUSTAINABILITY FEATURES
The project will require the contractor to recycle all construction and demolition debris generated from the project.

Page 3 of 3 ends

PUBLIC CONTACT
Immediately after the construction contract is awarded, a preliminary notice explaining the project will be distributed to the residences adjacent to the limits of work. After the construction work has been scheduled residents will be notified at least seven-two hours prior to actual commencement of work.

SCHEDULE
The estimated schedule for this project is as follows:

Call for Bids March 26, 2024
Open Bids April 23, 2024
Award Construction Contract May 21, 2024
Begin Construction June 2024
Complete Construction July 2024

NEXT STEP
After staff evaluates the bid results, staff will return to Council with the recommendation for award of the construction contract.

Prepared by: Kevin Yoshiki, Assistant Civil Engineer
Kathy Garcia, Deputy Director of Public Works
Recommended by: Alex Ameri, Director of Public Works
Approved by:

Kelly McAdoo, City Manager

ATTACHMENT II

Page 1 of 2 ends

HAYWARD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 24-
Introduced by Council Member _

RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND CALL FOR BIDS

FOR ALVES STREET AND LEIGHTON STREET DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 07794
WHEREAS, those certain plans and specifications for Alves Street and Leighton Street Drainage Improvements Project No. 07794 on file in the office of the City Clerk, are hereby adopted as plans and specifications for the project; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice calling for bids for the required work and material to be made in the form and manner provided by law; and WHEREAS, sealed bids therefor will be received by the City Clerk’s office at City Hall, 777 B Street, First Floor, Hayward, California 94541, up to the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday April 23, 2024, and immediately thereafter publicly opened and declared by the City Clerk in the Rotunda, First Floor, at City Hall.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Hayward will consider a report on the bids at a regular meeting following the aforesaid opening and declaration of same.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the project is categorically exempt for environmental review under Section 15301(c) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines for the operation, repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing facilities.

ATTACHMENT II

Page 2 of 2 ends

IN COUNCIL, HAYWARD, CALIFORNIA
ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MAYOR:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTESTED:

City Clerk of the City of Hayward
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

City Attorney of the City of Hayward

CITY OF HAYWARD Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
File #: CONS 24-151
DATE: March 26, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works

SUBJECT
Adopt a Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications for the Purchase of Continuous Deflective Separator (CDS) Units, and Calling for Bids for a Trash Capture Device Installation on Arf Avenue, Project No. 07746

RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopts a resolution (Attachment II):
· approving the plans and specifications for one Continuous Deflective Separator (CDS) trash capture device installation in the existing storm drainpipes on Arf Avenue; and · calling for bids to be received on April 23, 2024; and · approving a sole source purchase of one CDS unit from Contech an amount not-to-exceed $201,000.

SUMMARY
The proposed project would install a CDS unit in the existing storm drainpipe on a parcel owned by Alameda County Flood Control District off Arf Avenue for trash capture from the storm water system. The project will help the City meet the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Board) mandate to remove 100% of trash from the stormwater system by July 1, 2025. The CDS unit creates a continuous swirl of stormwater to concentrate and separate trash and debris. This project will be funded by Caltrans. The City and Caltrans entered into a cooperative agreement to complete trash capture projects to mutual trash reduction credit. The cooperative agreement was approved by Council on April 20, 2021.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 1 of 2 Printed on 3/22/2024
powered by Legistar™
File #: CONS 24-151
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 2 of 2 Printed on 3/22/2024
powered by Legistar™

Page 1 of 5 ends

DATE: March 26, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works

RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopts a resolution (Attachment II):
 approving the plans and specifications for one Continuous Deflective Separator (CDS) trash capture device installation in the existing storm drainpipes on Arf Avenue; and  calling for bids to be received on April 23, 2024; and  approving a sole source purchase of one CDS unit from Contech an amount not-toexceed $201,000.

BACKGROUND
The National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program was established in 1972 by the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA). The NPDES program was amended in 1986 to regulate stormwater runoff and established a permitting structure for municipal discharge to the waters of the state. From 1990 to 2009 each municipality in the Bay Area was regulated under countywide stormwater permits with individual requirements specific to each county.

Page 2 of 5 ends

On October 14, 2009, the first regional stormwater permit, the Municipal Regional Permit (MRP), was adopted by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board. The MRP regulated municipalities within the counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Santa Clara, San Mateo as well as the cities of Fairfield, Suisun, and Vallejo and the Vallejo Sanitation and Flood Control District. Municipalities and local agencies included in the MRP are referred to as ‘Permittees’. The MRP is renewed about every five years and is currently on its third cycle (MRP 3.0). The MRP 3.0 covers storm water discharges from municipalities and local agencies (also called permittees) in Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, and Santa Clara counties, and the cities of Fairfield, Suisun, and Vallejo.

Provision C.10 of the MRP 3.0 includes the trash reduction requirements for Permittees to reduce all trash from stormwater systems to waters of the state by 100% by the year 2025.

The City currently has 97.3% credit for trash reduction. Included in the 97.3% are credits the City receives for trash reduction from trash capture devices in the storm drain infrastructure.

The City currently owns 629 small trash capture devices installed in storm drain catch basins and five large underground trash capture devices installed in storm drainpipes. Three are located at Patrick Avenue, Tennyson Road and Cotter Way and two were recently installed in the Caltrans right of way (ROW), off Tennyson Road in 2023.

Under the new MRP 3.0 trash reduction credits from product bans and on-land trash pick-up efforts in creeks and shorelines will expire. In an effort to recover lost credit from this new order under MRP 3.0, staff have plans to install more trash capture devices throughout the City. One such effort is partnering with Caltrans to find drainage areas that include both City ROW and Caltrans ROW. Filtering trash downstream of these areas captures a large area for trash reduction credit that is mutually beneficial for both agencies.

Like the City, Caltrans also has a mandate to eliminate trash from stormwater from its ROW.

Similar to the City, Caltrans has a trash reduction plan, which includes installing trash capture devices to remove trash from stormwater flowing on their ROW. Throughout Caltrans ROW there are very few opportunities to install large trash capture devices due to space needed for installation and the direction of stormwater flow along freeways. Caltrans and several cities have looked to collaborative projects to install trash capture devices downstream of Caltrans ROW, within city jurisdictions to capture trash in areas required to be treated for trash. The collaborative trash capture projects between Hayward and Caltrans will help achieve stormwater compliance for both agencies and will include funding from Caltrans to help carry out Hayward’s plan for compliance.

On April 20, 20211, after Staff negotiated and finalized plans for trash capture projects that were mutually beneficial with Caltrans, Council approved a cooperative agreement to partner with Caltrans. Caltrans and City staff identified two projects, one located on Arf Avenue and one on Tennyson Road for trash capture. Both locations have large stormwater pipes that are owned by the Alameda County Flood Control District.

1 https://hayward.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4916428&GUID=5A8A9657-693A-48B0-9D7F7E207950AC98&Options=ID|Text|&Search=april+20

Page 3 of 5 ends

DISCUSSION
This project will install a large trash capture device on Arf Avenue on existing stormwater pipes to treat stormwater to meet MRP 3.0 trash reduction requirements and mutually benefit the City and Caltrans. The trash capture device at this location will capture trash from approximately 436 acres of storm water runoff area and provide approximately 3% trash reduction credit to the City. Caltrans has budgeted sufficient funds to pay for the Arf Avenue project.

Sole Source Purchase – The City currently has five CDS units manufactured by Contech Stormwater Solutions (Contech):
 One unit at the intersection of Tyrrell Avenue and West Tennyson Road, installed in 2012.
 One unit in Patrick Avenue, installed in 2017
 One unit in Cotter Way, installed in 2022
 Two units installed in Tennyson Rd and I-880 interchange, installed in 2023.

Contech is the only company that manufactures this type of device using the CDS technology.

Staff’s experience with Contech’s CDS devices and technical assistance has been successful both for trash capture and for maintenance ease. Staff believes that the Contech CDS unit is the most appropriate device to capture the trash from storm water runoff at Arf Avenue.

In addition, other municipalities in the Bay Area, including the Cities of Richmond, San Jose, and Oakland have installed Contech CDS devices and maintenance and ease of use have been similar to the City’s experience. On October 25, 20222, Council approved the sole source purchase of two Contech CDS units for the Tennyson Road project mentioned above.

If approved, staff will purchase the CDS units directly from Contech. The timeframe to complete this project is very short and the need to release the call for competitive bids to contractors to install the unit is an immediate need. Due to the Caltrans requirements, the construction of this project should be complete before end of July 2024. Installation at the Arf Avenue location will entail excavation in the sidewalk on the south side of Arf Avenue on a property owned by the Alameda County Flood Control District, installing a diversion box and CDS unit on the existing storm drainpipe and backfilling the area to pre-construction conditions. Prior to backfilling, the CDS unit will be leak-tested to assure water tightness at all the joints.

Long-term maintenance of the CDS unit on Arf Avenue will include an annual cleaning to remove the trash by City staff. Maintenance will typically be scheduled in the spring or summer months prior to the rainy season for the Arf Avenue unit as well as the City’s other CDS units.

The proposed project are categorically exempt from environmental review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1 (Minor

2 https://hayward.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5894955&GUID=682A5AFC-DBD2-4B40-9660-7F7F61EA5B17&Options=&Search=

Page 4 of 5 ends

Alteration of Existing Facilities) and Section 15302, Class 2 (Replacement or Reconstruction of Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines.

ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACT
The estimated project costs are as follows:

Design and Construction Administration - City Staff $30,000 Testing and Inspection Services (Estimated) $25,500
Construction Contract (Estimated) $710,000
Trash Capture Device (Contech) $201,000
Administrative Change Order (Estimated) $71,000
Total: $1,037,500
The cooperative agreement between the City and Caltrans will provide the total funding of $1,037,500 for this project.

SUSTAINABILITY FEATURES
The CDS units, along with the existing trash capture devices in the City’s storm drain system will help to limit the pollutants that enter local creeks and the San Francisco Bay.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Prior to and during construction, notices will be provided to affected residents, property, and business owners to inform them of the nature and purpose of the work, potential impacts, work schedule and City contact for additional information. In addition, staff will work closely with residents and businesses close to the project site, to minimize potential impacts.

NEXT STEPS
If Council approve this project, staff will purchase the CDS units from Contech and advertise the construction project for public bidding. Staff will return to Council for award of the construction contract after bids have been received and reviewed. The following schedule has been developed for this project:

Receive Bids April 23, 2024
Award Construction Contract May 21, 2024
Start Construction Contract June 2024
Complete Construction July 2024

Page 5 of 5 ends

Prepared by: Elisa Wilfong, Water Pollution Control Administrator Saeed Saebi, Senior Civil Engineer
Erik Pearson, Environmental Services Manager
Kathy Garcia, Deputy Public Works Director
Recommended by: Alex Ameri, Director of Public Works
Approved by:
________________________________________
Kelly McAdoo, City Manager

ATTACHMENT II

Page 1 of 2 ends

HAYWARD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 24-_____
Introduced by Council Member __________

RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, PURCHASING

CONTINUOUS DEFLECTIVE SEPARATOR UNIT, AND CALLING FOR BIDS

FOR A TRASH CAPTURE DEVICE INSTALLATION ON ARF AVE,
PROJECT NO. 07746
WHERAS, the City is required by the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Board) to reduce all trash from stormwater systems to waters of the state by 100% by the year 2025; and
WHERAS, the City and Caltrans worked collaboratively to find a location for a trash capture device on Arf Avenue that will count toward both agencies’ compliance targets; and WHERAS, the City and Caltrans entered into a Cooperative Implementation Agreement whereby Caltrans agreed to fully fund the project on Arf Avenue; and WHERAS, the City has prepared certain plans and specifications for the installation of a Continuous Deflective Separator (CDS) Trash Capture Device on Arf Avenue, Project No. 07746; and
WHEREAS, the City will purchase the CDS unit directly from Contech as the only manufacturer of a CDS unit approved by the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Hayward that those certain plans and specifications for the installation of a Continuous Deflective Separator (CDS) Trash Capture Device, Project No. 07746, on file in the office of the City Clerk, are hereby adopted as the plans and specifications for the project; and BE IT FUTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice calling for bids for the required work and material to be made in the form and manner provided by law.

ATTACHMENT II

Page 2 of 2 ends

BE IT FUTHER RESOLVED, that sealed bids therefore will be received by the City Clerk’s office at City Hall, 777 B Street, 4th Floor, Hayward, California 94541, up to the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 23, 2024, and immediately thereafter publicly opened and declared by the City Clerk in the Hayward City Hall Rotunda, located on the 1st Floor of City Hall, Hayward, California.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council will consider a report on the bids received at a regular meeting following the aforesaid opening and declaration of same.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that staff is hereby authorized to negotiate a sole source purchase of the CDS unit from Contech in an amount not to exceed $201,000.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council finds this project to be categorically exempt from environmental review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1 (Minor Alteration of Existing Facilities) and Section 15302, Class 2 (Replacement or Reconstruction of Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines.

IN COUNCIL, HAYWARD, CALIFORNIA _______________________, 2024 ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MAYOR:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: ______________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Hayward
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________________
City Attorney of the City of Hayward
CITY OF HAYWARD Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
File #: CONS 24-154
DATE: March 26, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Human Resources

SUBJECT
Adopt a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the City of Hayward Salary Plan for Fiscal Year 2024

RECOMMENDATION
That the Council adopts a resolution (Attachment II) approving an amendment to the City of Hayward Salary Plan for Fiscal Year 2024 (FY2024), which designates all classification and corresponding salary ranges for employment with the City of Hayward as March 25, 2024 superseding Resolution No. 24-012 and all amendments thereto.

The Salary Plan has also been revised to reflect revisions to the classification titles of eight (8) classifications in the City’s classified service.

On March 14, 2024, the Personnel Commission held a public hearing in which they reviewed and recommended to Council the adoption of the revised FY 2024 Salary Plan.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
Attachment III FY 2024 Salary Plan
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 1 of 1 Printed on 3/22/2024
powered by Legistar™

Page 1 of 6 ends

DATE: March 26, 2024
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Director ofHuman Resources
SUBJECT: FY 2024 Salary Plan Amendment: Adopt a Resolution Approving an Amendment to the City of Hayward Salary Plan for Fiscal Year 2024

SUMMARY
As required by the Municipal Code, the FY 2024 Salary Plan (Attachment III) has been updated to reflectthe addition of four (4) new classifications and salary adjustments to eleven (11) classifications. TheSalary Plan has also been revised to reflect revisions to the classification titles of eight (8) classifications in the City’s classified service.

On March 14, 2024, the Personnel Commission held a public hearing in which they reviewed and recommended to Council the adoption of the revised FY 2024 Salary Plan.

BACKGROUNDDISCUSSION
NewClassifications
PRINCIPAL TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER (H217): This new classificationwill be housed in the Transportation Division as a mid-management level position to support the Director and Deputy Director in representing and advocating for the City ofHayward at the regional level and providing day-to-day direction to staff. The salary for Principal Transportation Engineer will be set internally to be ten percent(10%) aboveSenior Transportation Engineer (H215).

The new salary range for Principal Transportation Engineer is $76.68 atStep A and $93.20 at Step E.

PRINCIPAL UTILITIES ENGINEER (H812): This new classification will be housed in the Utilities EngineeringSection ofthe UtilitiesDivision as a mid-managementlevel position to support theUtilities Engineering Manager by providing day-to-day supervision of staff and working

Page 2 of 6 ends

closely with consultants and contractors. The salary for Principal Utilities Engineer will be set internally to be ten percent(10%) aboveSeniorUtilities Engineer (H810). The new salary range for PrincipalUtilities Engineer is $80.53 atStep A and $97.88 atStep E.

SENIORDEVELOPMENTREVIEW SPECIALIST (T322): The addition ofthis classification will create a flexibly-staffed classification series which includes the existingDevelopment Review Specialist. The salary forSeniorDevelopment Review Specialist will be setinternally to be ten percent(10%) aboveDevelopment Review Specialist(T320). The new salary range forSenior Development Review Specialist is $52.50 atStep A and $64.01 atStep E.

WATER RESOURCES PLANNER (T870): This new classification will be housed in the Water Resources PlanningSection ofthe UtilitiesDivision as a journey-level classification reporting to the Water Resources Manager or other assigned management staff. This position will manage non-engineering functions of projects such as Phase II Recycled Water and groundwater sustainability, as well as assist with water conservation and water use efficiency efforts. Based on a total compensation market study conducted by Bryce Consulting, the salary for Water Resources Planner will be initially setto the market median which is approximately $10,900 a month. The new salary range for Water Resources Planner is $51.74 atStep A and $62.89 atStep E.

Living Wage Ordinance:

The Living Wage Ordinance, established July 1, 1999, was designed to upwardly adjust and reflect a change in the Bay Area Consumer Price Index. The salaries for Intern classifications (Administrative Intern, Information Technology Intern, and TechnicalIntern)fall under Section 2, Article 14 of the City Charter regarding the Living Wage Ordinance. The last salary adjustmentto Intern classifications occurred on September 30, 2019. As such, the salaries for these classifications shall be adjusted to reflect salaries that would be in place had the provisions ofthe Living Wage Ordinance been applied consistently. Based on the CPI data available,the salaries for Administrative Intern, Information Technology Intern, and Technical Intern shall be adjusted 15.15% effective March 25, 2024. The new salaries are as follows:

ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN (Z120): The new salary range for Administrative Intern is $18.21 at Step A and $23.03 atStep E.

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INTERN(Z121): The new salary range for Information Technology Intern is $18.21 atStep A and $23.03 atStep E.

TECHNICAL INTERN (Z125): The new salary range for Technical Intern is $18.21 atStep E.

Public Works Department Reorganization
As a result of the revisions to several classifications in the Public WorksDepartment the Salary Plan has been revised to reflect salary adjustments to six (6) existing classifications.

TheSalary Plan and Classification plan have also been revised to reflect revisions to eight classification titles. A list of the revised classification titles are outlined in Table 1 below. The new salaries for the six (6) existing classifications are as follows:

Page 3 of 6 ends

LABORATORY MANAGER (H850): Citywide internal alignment was considered for Laboratory Supervisorwith comparable MaintenanceServices Department management classifications.

Laboratory Manager shall receive a 7.69% salary adjustment effective March 25, 2024. The salary range for Laboratory Manager is $67.49 atStep A and $82.03 atStep E.

WASTEWATER COLLECTIONS SYSTEMS MANAGER (H823): Citywide internal alignment was considered for Wastewater CollectionsSystemsSupervisor with comparable Maintenance ServicesDepartment management classifications. Wastewater CollectionsSystems Manager shall receive 10.93% effective March 25, 2024,the salary range for Wastewater Collections Systems Manager is $67.49 atStep A and $82.03 atStep E.

WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FACILTIY MAINTENANCE MANAGER (H860): As part ofthe Public Works Water Pollution Control Facility andUtilities Operations and Maintenance Supervisor reorganization, Bryce Consulting conducted a total compensation market study and recommended the salary for Water Pollution Control Facility Maintenance Manager be revised to the market median. Based on the market data, Water Pollution Control Facility Maintenance Manager shall receive a 12.05% salary adjustment effective March 25, 2024. The salary range for Water Pollution Control Facility Maintenance Manager is $70.22 atStep A and $85.35 atStep E.

UTILITIES FIELD SERVICES MANAGER (H825): The salary forUtilities Field Services Manager has been internally set to be equivalent to Water Pollution Control Facility Maintenance Manager (H860). As such, Utilities Field Services Manager shall receive a 11.63% salary adjustment effective March 25, 2024. The salary range forUtilities Field Services Manager is $70.22 atStep A and $85.35 atStep E.

WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FACILTIY OPERATIONS MANAGER (H855): The salary for Water Pollution Control FacilityOperations Manager has been internally set to be equivalent to Water Pollution Control Facility Maintenance Manager (H860). Water Pollution Control Facility Operations Manager shall receive a 15.42% salary adjustment effective March 25, 2024. The salary range for Water Pollution Control Facility Operations Manager is $70.22 at Step A and $85.35 atStep E.

UTILITIES ELECTRICAL& MECHANICAL OPERATIONS& MAINTENANCE MANAGER (H830):

The salary forUtilities Electrical and MechanicalOperations and Maintenance Manager has been internally setto be equivalentto Water Pollution Control Facility Maintenance Manager (H860).Utilities Electrical and Mechanical Operations and Maintenance Manager shall receive a 6.32% salary adjustment effective March 25, 2024. The salary range forUtilities Electrical and Mechanical Operations and Maintenance Manager is $70.22 atStep A and $85.35 atStep E.

Table 1: ClassificationTitle Revisions

Page 4 of 6 ends

Current Classification Title New Classification Title
Laboratory Supervisor (H850) Laboratory Manager
UtilitiesOperations& Maintenance
Supervisor (H830)
Utilities Electrical and Mechanical
Operations and Maintenance Manager
Utilities FieldServicesSupervisor (H825) Utilities FieldServices Manager Wastewater Collection System Supervisor
(H823)
Wastewater CollectionsSystem Manager
Water Pollution Control Facility
MaintenanceSupervisor (H860)
Water Pollution Control Facility
Maintenance Manager
Water Pollution Control Facility Operations
Supervisor (H855)
Water Pollution Control Facility Operations
Supervisor
Utility Worker (M835) Utility Worker – Water
Utility Leader (M840) Utility Leader – Water
SalaryAdjustments:

CHIEF ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT OFFICER (U330):Staff recommends adjusting the salary of the Chief Economic Development Officer position to bring the position into alignment with surrounding jurisdictions and to address competition and retention in the job market for this classification. In addition, the duties ofthe position will be expanded to include a focus on community workforce development, that includes further building partnerships and programs with theHayward Unified School District, Hayward AdultSchool, Chabot College and CSUEB. Based on a total compensation market study completed in December 2023,the salary for Chief EconomicDevelopment Officer shall be adjusted by 4.72% effective February 26, 2024. The new salary range for Chief Economic Development Officer is $86.85 atStep A and $105.59 atStep E.

UTILITIES OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANAGER (H835): Pursuant to Section 7.16 (SupervisoryDifferential) ofthe HAME MOU,HAME-represented supervisor classifications must maintain a ten percent(10%) minimum pay differential between their classification and their highest paid subordinate. Based on the salary adjustment to Utilities Electrical and MechanicalOperations and Maintenance Manager (H830), Utilities Operations and Maintenance Manager shall receive a 2.32% salary adjustment effective March 25, 2024. The salary forUtilities Operations and Maintenance Manager is $77.26 atStep A and $93.88 at Step E.

FISCAL IMPACT
PRINCIPAL TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER (H217): The addition of Principal Transportation Engineer was included in the FY 2024 Adopted Budget. Therefore,there is no additional fiscal impact.

PRINCIPALUTILITIES ENGINEER (H812): The addition of PrincipalUtilities Engineer was included in the FY 2024 Adopted Budget. Therefore,there is no additional fiscal impact.

Page 5 of 6 ends

SENIORDEVELOPMENTREVIEW SPECIALIST (T322): The addition ofSeniorDevelopment ReviewSpecialist was included in the FY 2024 Adopted Budget. Therefore,there is no additionalfiscal impact.

WATER RESOURCES PLANNER (T870): The addition of Water Resources Planner was included in the FY 2024 Adopted Budget. Therefore, there is no additional fiscal impact.

ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN (Z120): The additional fiscal impact to the FY 2024 budget for the salary adjustmentto Administrative Intern is approximately $1,264 from the General Fund, $1,264 from Enterprise Funds, for a total fiscal impact of $2,529.

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INTERN(Z121): The additional fiscal impact to the FY 2024 budget for the salary adjustmentto Information Technology Intern is approximately $1,264 to the InternalServices Funds.

TECHNICAL INTERN (Z125): The additional fiscal impactto the FY 2024 budget for the salary adjustmentto TechnicalIntern is approximately $1,264 to the Enterprise Funds.

LABORATORY MANAGER (H850): The additional fiscal impact to the FY 2024 budget for the salary adjustmentto Laboratory Manager is approximately $3,373 to the Enterprise Funds.

WASTEWATER COLLECTIONS SYSTEMS MANAGER (H823): The additional fiscal impact to the FY 2024 budget for the salary adjustment to Wastewater CollectionsSystems Manager is approximately $5,161 to the Enterprise Funds.

WATER POLLUTIONCONTROL FACILTIY MAINTENANCE MANAGER (H860): The additional fiscal impact to the FY 2024 budget for the salary adjustmentto Water Pollution Control Facility Maintenance Manager is approximately $5,858 to the Enterprise Funds.

UTILITIES FIELD SERVICES MANAGER (H825): The additional fiscal impact to the FY 2024 budget for the salary adjustmentto Utilities Field Services Manager is approximately $3,212 to the Enterprise Funds.

WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FACILTIY OPERATIONS MANAGER (H855): The additional fiscal impactto the FY 2024 budget for the salary adjustmentto Water Pollution Control Facility Operations Manager is approximately $7,057 to the Enterprise Funds.

UTILITIES ELECTRICAL& MECHANICAL OPERATIONS& MAINTENANCE MANAGER (H830):

The additional fiscal impactto the FY 2024 budget for the salary adjustmentto Utilities Electrical& MechanicalOperations& Maintenance Manager is approximately $3,212 to the Enterprise Funds.

CHIEF ECONOMICDEVELOPMENTOFFICER (U330): The additional fiscal impactto the FY 2024 budget for the salary adjustment to Chief Economic Development Officer is approximately $3,681 to the General Fund.

UTILITIES OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANAGER (H835): The additional fiscal impact

Page 6 of 6 ends

to the FY 2024 budget for the salary adjustment to Utilities Operations and Maintenance Manager is approximately $1,469 to the Enterprise Funds.

STRATEGICROADMAP
This agenda item is a routine operational item and does not relate to one of the City Council’s Strategic Roadmap initiatives.

NEXT STEPS
If approved, the salary adjustments will be implemented by the Human Resources Department and Finance Department and will be reflected in the employees; paychecks dated April 12, 2024. Appropriate retroactive payments based on the dates in this report will follow.

Prepared by: Valeria Cazares,HumanResources Analyst I
Recommended by: Ian Tecson, Deputy Director ofHuman Resources Brittney Frye, Director of Human Resources
Approved by:
_______________________________________
Kelly McAdoo, City Manager

ATTACHMENT II

Page 1 of 2 ends

HAYWARD CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. 24-_____
Introduced by Council Member _____________
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 2024 SALARY PLAN

DESIGNATING POSITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT IN THE CITY OF HAYWARD AND SALARY RANGE; AND SUPERSEDING RESOLUTION NO. 24-012 AND ALL

AMENDMENTS THERETO
WHEREAS, the Salary Plan has been revised to reflect the addition of four (4) classifications effective March 25, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the Salary Plan has been revised to reflect salary adjustments to one (1) classification effective February 26, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the Salary Plan has been revised to reflect salary adjustments to ten (10) additional classifications effective March 25, 2024; and WHEREAS, the Salary Plan has been revised to reflect revisions to classification titles of eight (8) classifications effective March 25, 2024; and WHEREAS, the Salary Plan must be amended to ensure it is reflective of these changes.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hayward, as follows:

Section 1. That a revised Positions and Salaries Schedule relating to the positions of employment in the City of Hayward, and the hourly rates of pay for those positions, is hereby set forth in Attachment "III," attached hereto and made a part hereof. The positions enumerated under the columns headed "Classification Title" are hereby designated as the positions of employment in the City of Hayward, and the hourly, bi-weekly, monthly, and annual rates of pay shown in the adjacent rows under the headings "Step A” through “Step E” are the salary rates or the minimum and maximum rates of pay for such positions.

Section 2. Salaries paid to occupants of said positions shall be administered in accordance with the Personnel Rules and Memoranda of Understanding and Side Letter Agreements approved by the City Council and currently in effect.

Section 3. All class titles used herein refer to the specifications of the position classification plan as reviewed by the Personnel Commission of the City of Hayward, or as set forth in the City Charter.

ATTACHMENT II

Page 2 of 2 ends

Section 4. The City Manager may approve in advance of an established effective date, payment to certain classifications in the Management Unit of all or a portion of a general salary increase previously approved by the City Council. Such advance payments shall be made only for those management classifications where the salary range is less than ten percent above an immediately subordinate classification. The amount of advance payment approved by the City Manager shall not exceed the amount required to establish a ten percent salary differential between the affected classifications. The City Manager shall advise the City Council and each bargaining unit in advance of any payments made pursuant to the provisions of this section.

Section 5. The salary ranges set forth in Attachment "III" shall be revised to reflect salary changes provided in any Memorandum of Understanding, Side Letters of Agreement, or resolution setting forth the wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment for a bargaining unit or group of unrepresented employees of the City. Any revisions made pursuant to the provisions of this section shall be incorporated into a document prepared by the Human Resources Director and distributed to affected employees or their representatives that reflects the date of the revision and cites both the authority provided by this section and the provision of the memorandum or resolution being effectuated by the revision.

Section 6. This resolution supersedes Resolution No. 24-012 and all amendments thereto.

IN COUNCIL, HAYWARD, CALIFORNIA _______________________, 2024 ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MAYOR:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: ______________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Hayward
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________________
City Attorney of the City of Hayward

SALARY PLAN FOR ALL CLASSIFICATIONS
(PER MUNI CODE SEC.2-4.30)
FY 2024

ATTACHMENT III
Recommended by
Personnel Commission
on March 14, 2024
Approved by Council
on March 26, 2024
Classification Title Job Code Service Type Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E

CITY ELECTED OFFICIALS/APPOINTED OFFICERS/EXECUTIVES
Hourly
Bi-Weekly
Monthly
Annual 69,288.00
Hourly
Bi-Weekly
Monthly
Annual 43,305.00
Hourly 183.16
Bi-Weekly 14,652.80
Monthly 31,747.73
Annual 380,972.80
Hourly 161.35
Bi-Weekly 12,908.00
Monthly 27,967.33
Annual 335,608.00
Hourly 91.24
Bi-Weekly 7,299.20
Monthly 15,814.93
Annual 189,779.20
Hourly 109.91 115.42 121.18 127.24 133.60
Bi-Weekly 8,792.80 9,233.60 9,694.40 10,179.20 10,688.00 Monthly 19,051.07 20,006.13 21,004.53 22,054.93 23,157.33 Annual 228,612.80 240,073.60 252,054.40 264,659.20 277,888.00 Hourly 140.12 147.10 154.47 162.19 170.30
Bi-Weekly 11,209.94 11,767.63 12,357.53 12,975.04 13,623.84 Monthly 24,288.21 25,496.54 26,774.64 28,112.59 29,518.32 Annual 291,458.54 305,958.43 321,295.73 337,351.04 354,219.84 Hourly 77.69 81.59 85.64 89.94 94.45
Bi-Weekly 6,215.20 6,527.20 6,851.20 7,195.20 7,556.00
Monthly 13,466.27 14,142.27 14,844.27 15,589.60 16,371.33 Annual 161,595.20 169,707.20 178,131.20 187,075.20 196,456.00 Hourly 100.29 105.29 110.57 116.11 121.89
Bi-Weekly 8,023.20 8,423.20 8,845.60 9,288.80 9,751.20
Monthly 17,383.60 18,250.27 19,165.47 20,125.73 21,127.60 Annual 208,603.20 219,003.20 229,985.60 241,508.80 253,531.20 Hourly 98.08 102.97 108.14 113.55 119.22
Bi-Weekly 7,846.40 8,237.60 8,651.20 9,084.00 9,537.60
Monthly 17,000.53 17,848.13 18,744.27 19,682.00 20,664.80 Annual 204,006.40 214,177.60 224,931.20 236,184.00 247,977.60 Hourly 96.21 101.01 106.08 111.38 116.94
Bi-Weekly 7,696.80 8,080.80 8,486.40 8,910.40 9,355.20
Monthly 16,676.40 17,508.40 18,387.20 19,305.87 20,269.60 Annual 200,116.80 210,100.80 220,646.40 231,670.40 243,235.20 Hourly 100.29 105.28 110.55 116.08 121.87
Bi-Weekly 8,023.20 8,422.40 8,844.00 9,286.40 9,749.60
Monthly 17,383.60 18,248.53 19,162.00 20,120.53 21,124.13 Annual 208,603.20 218,982.40 229,944.00 241,446.40 253,489.60 Hourly 99.03 103.94 109.16 114.63 120.35
Bi-Weekly 7,922.40 8,315.20 8,732.80 9,170.40 9,628.00
Monthly 17,165.20 18,016.27 18,921.07 19,869.20 20,860.67 Annual 205,982.40 216,195.20 227,052.80 238,430.40 250,328.00 Hourly 98.08 102.97 108.14 113.55 119.22
Bi-Weekly 7,846.40 8,237.60 8,651.20 9,084.00 9,537.60
Monthly 17,000.53 17,848.13 18,744.27 19,682.00 20,664.80 Annual 204,006.40 214,177.60 224,931.20 236,184.00 247,977.60 Hourly 98.08 102.97 108.14 113.55 119.22
Bi-Weekly 7,846.40 8,237.60 8,651.20 9,084.00 9,537.60
Monthly 17,000.53 17,848.13 18,744.27 19,682.00 20,664.80 Annual 204,006.40 214,177.60 224,931.20 236,184.00 247,977.60 Hourly 99.92 104.94 110.18 115.71 121.46
Bi-Weekly 7,993.60 8,395.20 8,814.40 9,256.80 9,716.80
Monthly 17,319.47 18,189.60 19,097.87 20,056.40 21,053.07 Annual 207,833.60 218,275.20 229,174.40 240,676.80 252,636.80 Hourly 139.41 146.36 153.69 161.38 169.45
Bi-Weekly 11,152.80 11,708.80 12,295.20 12,910.40 13,556.00 Monthly 24,164.40 25,369.07 26,639.60 27,972.53 29,371.33 Annual 289,972.80 304,428.80 319,675.20 335,670.40 352,456.00 E110 Unclassified
E100 Unclassified
A110 Unclassified
A100 Unclassified
A120 Unclassified
U311 Unclassified
P500 Unclassified
U735 Unclassified
U725 Unclassified
U700 Unclassified
U505 Unclassified
U710 Unclassified
U720 Unclassified
U705 Unclassified
F800 Unclassified
U730 Unclassified
U715 Unclassified
MAYOR

CITY COUNCIL

CITY MANAGER

CITY ATTORNEY

CITY CLERK

ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER

CHIEF OF POLICE

DIRECTOR OF LIBRARY SERVICES

DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE SERVICES

DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS

FIRE CHIEF

COMMUNICATIONS AND MARKETING OFFICER / PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER (PIO)

DEPUTY CITY MANAGER

DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

DIRECTOR OF FINANCE

DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES

DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY / CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER (CIO) Salaries Effective March 25, 2024 1

SALARY PLAN FOR ALL CLASSIFICATIONS
(PER MUNI CODE SEC.2-4.30)
FY 2024

ATTACHMENT III
Recommended by
Personnel Commission
on March 14, 2024
Approved by Council
on March 26, 2024
Classification Title Job Code Service Type Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E

CITY WIDE ADMINISTRATIVE/ANALYTICAL SUPPORT
Hourly 60.12 63.09 66.26 69.56 73.04
Bi-Weekly 4,809.60 5,047.20 5,300.80 5,564.80 5,843.20
Monthly 10,420.80 10,935.60 11,485.07 12,057.07 12,660.27 Annual 125,049.60 131,227.20 137,820.80 144,684.80 151,923.20 Hourly 54.66 57.39 60.26 63.27 66.41
Bi-Weekly 4,372.80 4,591.20 4,820.80 5,061.60 5,312.80
Monthly 9,474.40 9,947.60 10,445.07 10,966.80 11,511.07 Annual 113,692.80 119,371.20 125,340.80 131,601.60 138,132.80 Hourly 49.70 52.20 54.79 57.52 60.40
Bi-Weekly 3,976.00 4,176.00 4,383.20 4,601.60 4,832.00
Monthly 8,614.67 9,048.00 9,496.93 9,970.13 10,469.33
Annual 103,376.00 108,576.00 113,963.20 119,641.60 125,632.00 Hourly 47.09 49.26 51.48 53.69 56.05
Bi-Weekly 3,767.20 3,940.80 4,118.40 4,295.20 4,484.00
Monthly 8,162.27 8,538.40 8,923.20 9,306.27 9,715.33
Annual 97,947.20 102,460.80 107,078.40 111,675.20 116,584.00 Hourly 46.64 48.95 51.41 53.95 56.66
Bi-Weekly 3,731.20 3,916.00 4,112.80 4,316.00 4,532.80
Monthly 8,084.27 8,484.67 8,911.07 9,351.33 9,821.07
Annual 97,011.20 101,816.00 106,932.80 112,216.00 117,852.80 Hourly 43.65 45.44 47.23 49.01 50.96
Bi-Weekly 3,492.00 3,635.20 3,778.40 3,920.80 4,076.80
Monthly 7,566.00 7,876.27 8,186.53 8,495.07 8,833.07
Annual 90,792.00 94,515.20 98,238.40 101,940.80 105,996.80 Hourly 39.90 41.45 43.14 44.73 46.45
Bi-Weekly 3,192.00 3,316.00 3,451.20 3,578.40 3,716.00
Monthly 6,916.00 7,184.67 7,477.60 7,753.20 8,051.33
Annual 82,992.00 86,216.00 89,731.20 93,038.40 96,616.00 Hourly 35.11 36.72 38.58 40.36 42.27
Bi-Weekly 2,808.80 2,937.60 3,086.40 3,228.80 3,381.60
Monthly 6,085.73 6,364.80 6,687.20 6,995.73 7,326.80
Annual 73,028.80 76,377.60 80,246.40 83,948.80 87,921.60 Hourly 30.79 32.06 33.36 34.85 36.56
Bi-Weekly 2,463.20 2,564.80 2,668.80 2,788.00 2,924.80
Monthly 5,336.93 5,557.07 5,782.40 6,040.67 6,337.07
Annual 64,043.20 66,684.80 69,388.80 72,488.00 76,044.80 Hourly 27.10 28.55 29.99 31.59 33.24
Bi-Weekly 2,168.00 2,284.00 2,399.20 2,527.20 2,659.20
Monthly 4,697.33 4,948.67 5,198.27 5,475.60 5,761.60
Annual 56,368.00 59,384.00 62,379.20 65,707.20 69,139.20 Hourly 18.21 23.03
Bi-Weekly 1,456.80 1,842.40
Monthly 3,156.40 3,991.87
Annual 37,876.80 47,902.40
Hourly 18.62 19.52 20.51
Bi-Weekly 1,489.60 1,561.60 1,640.80
Monthly 3,227.47 3,383.47 3,555.07
Annual 38,729.60 40,601.60 42,660.80
H105 Classified
H110 Classified
H115 Classified
C120 Classified
H120 Classified
U315 Unclassified
C105 Classified
C110 Classified
C115 Classified
C410 Classified
Z120 Classified
C100 Classified

ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK II

ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK I

ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN

MAIL CLERK

MANAGEMENT ANALYST I

EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT

SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST

MANAGEMENT ANALYST II

ADMINISTRATIVE SUPERVISOR

ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY

SENIOR SECRETARY

SECRETARY
Salaries Effective March 25, 2024 2

SALARY PLAN FOR ALL CLASSIFICATIONS
(PER MUNI CODE SEC.2-4.30)
FY 2024

ATTACHMENT III
Recommended by
Personnel Commission
on March 14, 2024
Approved by Council
on March 26, 2024
Classification Title Job Code Service Type Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E

CITY WIDE MAINTENANCE
Hourly 51.05 53.08 55.17 57.52 59.89
Bi-Weekly 4,084.00 4,246.40 4,413.60 4,601.60 4,791.20
Monthly 8,848.67 9,200.53 9,562.80 9,970.13 10,380.93
Annual 106,184.00 110,406.40 114,753.60 119,641.60 124,571.20 Hourly 46.42 48.33 50.24 52.34 54.48
Bi-Weekly 3,713.60 3,866.40 4,019.20 4,187.20 4,358.40
Monthly 8,046.13 8,377.20 8,708.27 9,072.27 9,443.20
Annual 96,553.60 100,526.40 104,499.20 108,867.20 113,318.40 Hourly 39.67 41.24 42.92 44.44 46.16
Bi-Weekly 3,173.60 3,299.20 3,433.60 3,555.20 3,692.80
Monthly 6,876.13 7,148.27 7,439.47 7,702.93 8,001.07
Annual 82,513.60 85,779.20 89,273.60 92,435.20 96,012.80 Hourly 30.17 31.28 32.52 33.85 35.06
Bi-Weekly 2,413.60 2,502.40 2,601.60 2,708.00 2,804.80
Monthly 5,229.47 5,421.87 5,636.80 5,867.33 6,077.07
Annual 62,753.60 65,062.40 67,641.60 70,408.00 72,924.80

CITY ATTORNEY DEPARTMENT
Hourly 97.34 102.24 107.34 112.72 118.36
Bi-Weekly 7,787.20 8,179.20 8,587.20 9,017.60 9,468.80
Monthly 16,872.27 17,721.60 18,605.60 19,538.13 20,515.73 Annual 202,467.20 212,659.20 223,267.20 234,457.60 246,188.80 Hourly 82.87 87.00 91.39 95.94 100.73
Bi-Weekly 6,629.60 6,960.00 7,311.20 7,675.20 8,058.40
Monthly 14,364.13 15,080.00 15,840.93 16,629.60 17,459.87 Annual 172,369.60 180,960.00 190,091.20 199,555.20 209,518.40 Hourly 73.17 76.80 80.63 84.65 88.92
Bi-Weekly 5,853.60 6,144.00 6,450.40 6,772.00 7,113.60
Monthly 12,682.80 13,312.00 13,975.87 14,672.67 15,412.80 Annual 152,193.60 159,744.00 167,710.40 176,072.00 184,953.60 Hourly 62.27 65.37 68.64 72.08 75.68
Bi-Weekly 4,981.60 5,229.60 5,491.20 5,766.40 6,054.40
Monthly 10,793.47 11,330.80 11,897.60 12,493.87 13,117.87 Annual 129,521.60 135,969.60 142,771.20 149,926.40 157,414.40 Hourly 46.07 48.39 50.80 53.33 56.00
Bi-Weekly 3,685.60 3,871.20 4,064.00 4,266.40 4,480.00
Monthly 7,985.47 8,387.60 8,805.33 9,243.87 9,706.67
Annual 95,825.60 100,651.20 105,664.00 110,926.40 116,480.00 Hourly 41.87 43.97 46.18 48.47 50.90
Bi-Weekly 3,349.60 3,517.60 3,694.40 3,877.60 4,072.00
Monthly 7,257.47 7,621.47 8,004.53 8,401.47 8,822.67
Annual 87,089.60 91,457.60 96,054.40 100,817.60 105,872.00 Hourly 37.89 40.10 43.11 44.02 46.27
Bi-Weekly 3,031.20 3,208.00 3,448.80 3,521.60 3,701.60
Monthly 6,567.60 6,950.67 7,472.40 7,630.13 8,020.13
Annual 78,811.20 83,408.00 89,668.80 91,561.60 96,241.60 Hourly 34.13 35.92 37.82 39.86 41.96
Bi-Weekly 2,730.40 2,873.60 3,025.60 3,188.80 3,356.80
Monthly 5,915.87 6,226.13 6,555.47 6,909.07 7,273.07
Annual 70,990.40 74,713.60 78,665.60 82,908.80 87,276.80

CITY CLERK DEPARTMENT
Hourly 53.07 55.73 58.50 61.43 64.49
Bi-Weekly 4,245.60 4,458.40 4,680.00 4,914.40 5,159.20
Monthly 9,198.80 9,659.87 10,140.00 10,647.87 11,178.27 Annual 110,385.60 115,918.40 121,680.00 127,774.40 134,139.20 M305 Classified
M405 Classified
M410 Classified
U215 Classified
U210 Classified
M200
M300
M830
M905
Classified
U196
U195
Classified
Classified
U205 Classified
U200 Classified
H500 Classified
C930 Classified
C935 Classified

SENIOR PARALEGAL

PARALEGAL

LEGAL SECRETARY II

LEGAL SECRETARY I

DEPUTY CITY CLERK

ELECTRICIAN II

ELECTRICIAN I

MAINTENANCE WORKER

LABORER

SENIOR ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY

ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY

DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY II

DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY I
Salaries Effective March 25, 2024 3

SALARY PLAN FOR ALL CLASSIFICATIONS
(PER MUNI CODE SEC.2-4.30)
FY 2024

ATTACHMENT III
Recommended by
Personnel Commission
on March 14, 2024
Approved by Council
on March 26, 2024
Classification Title Job Code Service Type Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E

CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
Hourly 70.72 74.25 77.96 81.86 85.94
Bi-Weekly 5,657.60 5,940.00 6,236.80 6,548.80 6,875.20
Monthly 12,258.13 12,870.00 13,513.07 14,189.07 14,896.27 Annual 147,097.60 154,440.00 162,156.80 170,268.80 178,755.20 Hourly 70.72 74.25 77.96 81.86 85.94
Bi-Weekly 5,657.60 5,940.00 6,236.80 6,548.80 6,875.20
Monthly 12,258.13 12,870.00 13,513.07 14,189.07 14,896.27 Annual 147,097.60 154,440.00 162,156.80 170,268.80 178,755.20 Hourly 38.31 40.18 42.33 44.43 46.58
Bi-Weekly 3,064.80 3,214.40 3,386.40 3,554.40 3,726.40
Monthly 6,640.40 6,964.53 7,337.20 7,701.20 8,073.87
Annual 79,684.80 83,574.40 88,046.40 92,414.40 96,886.40 Hourly 54.39 57.09 59.94 62.94 66.10
Bi-Weekly 4,351.20 4,567.20 4,795.20 5,035.20 5,288.00
Monthly 9,427.60 9,895.60 10,389.60 10,909.60 11,457.33 Annual 113,131.20 118,747.20 124,675.20 130,915.20 137,488.00 Hourly 39.76
Bi-Weekly 3,180.80
Monthly 6,891.73
Annual 82,700.80

COMMUNITY SERVICES
Hourly 73.21 76.87 80.72 84.78 88.99
Bi-Weekly 5,856.80 6,149.60 6,457.60 6,782.40 7,119.20
Monthly 12,689.73 13,324.13 13,991.47 14,695.20 15,424.93 Annual 152,276.80 159,889.60 167,897.60 176,342.40 185,099.20 Hourly 47.78 50.26 52.82 55.41 58.12
Bi-Weekly 3,822.40 4,020.80 4,225.60 4,432.80 4,649.60
Monthly 8,281.87 8,711.73 9,155.47 9,604.40 10,074.13
Annual 99,382.40 104,540.80 109,865.60 115,252.80 120,889.60 Hourly 52.53 55.26 58.07 60.94 63.91
Bi-Weekly 4,202.40 4,420.80 4,645.60 4,875.20 5,112.80
Monthly 9,105.20 9,578.40 10,065.47 10,562.93 11,077.73 Annual 109,262.40 114,940.80 120,785.60 126,755.20 132,932.80 Hourly 47.78 50.26 52.82 55.41 58.12
Bi-Weekly 3,822.40 4,020.80 4,225.60 4,432.80 4,649.60
Monthly 8,281.87 8,711.73 9,155.47 9,604.40 10,074.13
Annual 99,382.40 104,540.80 109,865.60 115,252.80 120,889.60 Hourly 45.55 47.82 50.13 52.68 55.25
Bi-Weekly 3,644.00 3,825.60 4,010.40 4,214.40 4,420.00
Monthly 7,895.33 8,288.80 8,689.20 9,131.20 9,576.67
Annual 94,744.00 99,465.60 104,270.40 109,574.40 114,920.00

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Hourly 86.85 91.21 95.78 100.58 105.59
Bi-Weekly 6,948.00 7,296.80 7,662.40 8,046.40 8,447.20
Monthly 15,054.00 15,809.73 16,601.87 17,433.87 18,302.27 Annual 180,648.00 189,716.80 199,222.40 209,206.40 219,627.20 Hourly 75.40 79.18 83.15 87.32 91.65
Bi-Weekly 6,032.00 6,334.40 6,652.00 6,985.60 7,332.00
Monthly 13,069.33 13,724.53 14,412.67 15,135.47 15,886.00 Annual 156,832.00 164,694.40 172,952.00 181,625.60 190,632.00 Hourly 51.85 54.45 57.11 60.02 62.95
Bi-Weekly 4,148.00 4,356.00 4,568.80 4,801.60 5,036.00
Monthly 8,987.33 9,438.00 9,899.07 10,403.47 10,911.33
Annual 107,848.00 113,256.00 118,788.80 124,841.60 130,936.00

NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP SERVICES
Hourly 74.47 78.15 82.06 86.15 90.47
Bi-Weekly 5,957.60 6,252.00 6,564.80 6,892.00 7,237.60
Monthly 12,908.13 13,546.00 14,223.73 14,932.67 15,681.47 Annual 154,897.60 162,552.00 170,684.80 179,192.00 188,177.60 Hourly 66.95 70.30 73.79 77.50 81.38
Bi-Weekly 5,356.00 5,624.00 5,903.20 6,200.00 6,510.40
Monthly 11,604.67 12,185.33 12,790.27 13,433.33 14,105.87 Annual 139,256.00 146,224.00 153,483.20 161,200.00 169,270.40 U340 Classified
T470 Classified
T300 Classified
U320 Unclassified
Classified
Classified
H745
T705
U300 Classified
T715 Classified
T725 Classified
T730 Classified
H735 Classified
H730 Classified
H710 Classified
T745 Classified
U330 Classified

PROPERTY REHABILITATION SPECIALIST

PARATRANSIT COORDINATOR

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST

NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT MANAGER

NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP MANAGER

CHIEF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

COMMUNITY SERVICES MANAGER

COMMUNITY PROGRAMS SPECIALIST

SENIOR PROPERTY REHABILITATION SPECIALIST

ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER

EQUITY AND INCLUSION OFFICER

GRAPHICS AND MEDIA RELATIONS TECHNICIAN

DIGITAL APPLICATIONS DEVELOPER

MANAGEMENT FELLOW
Salaries Effective March 25, 2024 4

SALARY PLAN FOR ALL CLASSIFICATIONS
(PER MUNI CODE SEC.2-4.30)
FY 2024

ATTACHMENT III
Recommended by
Personnel Commission
on March 14, 2024
Approved by Council
on March 26, 2024
Classification Title Job Code Service Type Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E

HOUSING AUTHORITY
Hourly 75.40 79.18 83.15 87.32 91.65
Bi-Weekly 6,032.00 6,334.40 6,652.00 6,985.60 7,332.00
Monthly 13,069.33 13,724.53 14,412.67 15,135.47 15,886.00 Annual 156,832.00 164,694.40 172,952.00 181,625.60 190,632.00 Hourly 51.85 54.45 57.11 60.02 62.95
Bi-Weekly 4,148.00 4,356.00 4,568.80 4,801.60 5,036.00
Monthly 8,987.33 9,438.00 9,899.07 10,403.47 10,911.33
Annual 107,848.00 113,256.00 118,788.80 124,841.60 130,936.00 Hourly 45.55 47.82 50.13 52.68 55.25
Bi-Weekly 3,644.00 3,825.60 4,010.40 4,214.40 4,420.00
Monthly 7,895.33 8,288.80 8,689.20 9,131.20 9,576.67
Annual 94,744.00 99,465.60 104,270.40 109,574.40 114,920.00

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT

DEVELOPMENT SERVICE ADMINISTRATION
Hourly 87.68 92.09 96.69 101.52 106.62
Bi-Weekly 7,014.40 7,367.20 7,735.20 8,121.60 8,529.60
Monthly 15,197.87 15,962.27 16,759.60 17,596.80 18,480.80 Annual 182,374.40 191,547.20 201,115.20 211,161.60 221,769.60

BUILDING DIVISION
Hourly 78.91 82.87 86.99 91.37 95.92
Bi-Weekly 6,312.80 6,629.60 6,959.20 7,309.60 7,673.60
Monthly 13,677.73 14,364.13 15,078.27 15,837.47 16,626.13 Annual 164,132.80 172,369.60 180,939.20 190,049.60 199,513.60 Hourly 64.13 67.34 70.71 74.25 77.96
Bi-Weekly 5,130.40 5,387.20 5,656.80 5,940.00 6,236.80
Monthly 11,115.87 11,672.27 12,256.40 12,870.00 13,513.07 Annual 133,390.40 140,067.20 147,076.80 154,440.00 162,156.80 Hourly 56.46 59.47 62.48 65.42 68.68
Bi-Weekly 4,516.80 4,757.60 4,998.40 5,233.60 5,494.40
Monthly 9,786.40 10,308.13 10,829.87 11,339.47 11,904.53 Annual 117,436.80 123,697.60 129,958.40 136,073.60 142,854.40 Hourly 56.46 59.47 62.48 65.42 68.68
Bi-Weekly 4,516.80 4,757.60 4,998.40 5,233.60 5,494.40
Monthly 9,786.40 10,308.13 10,829.87 11,339.47 11,904.53 Annual 117,436.80 123,697.60 129,958.40 136,073.60 142,854.40 Hourly 56.46 59.47 62.48 65.42 68.68
Bi-Weekly 4,516.80 4,757.60 4,998.40 5,233.60 5,494.40
Monthly 9,786.40 10,308.13 10,829.87 11,339.47 11,904.53 Annual 117,436.80 123,697.60 129,958.40 136,073.60 142,854.40 Hourly 48.74 51.04 53.63 56.36 60.05
Bi-Weekly 3,899.20 4,083.20 4,290.40 4,508.80 4,804.00
Monthly 8,448.27 8,846.93 9,295.87 9,769.07 10,408.67
Annual 101,379.20 106,163.20 111,550.40 117,228.80 124,904.00 Hourly 59.88 62.77 65.94 69.38 72.90
Bi-Weekly 4,790.40 5,021.60 5,275.20 5,550.40 5,832.00
Monthly 10,379.20 10,880.13 11,429.60 12,025.87 12,636.00 Annual 124,550.40 130,561.60 137,155.20 144,310.40 151,632.00 Hourly 68.06 71.45 75.04 78.80 82.75
Bi-Weekly 5,444.80 5,716.00 6,003.20 6,304.00 6,620.00
Monthly 11,797.07 12,384.67 13,006.93 13,658.67 14,343.33 Annual 141,564.80 148,616.00 156,083.20 163,904.00 172,120.00 Hourly 56.46 59.47 62.48 65.42 68.68
Bi-Weekly 4,516.80 4,757.60 4,998.40 5,233.60 5,494.40
Monthly 9,786.40 10,308.13 10,829.87 11,339.47 11,904.53 Annual 117,436.80 123,697.60 129,958.40 136,073.60 142,854.40 Hourly 51.35 54.03 56.79 59.49 62.46
Bi-Weekly 4,108.00 4,322.40 4,543.20 4,759.20 4,996.80
Monthly 8,900.67 9,365.20 9,843.60 10,311.60 10,826.40
Annual 106,808.00 112,382.40 118,123.20 123,739.20 129,916.80 U515 Classified
T710 Classified
H715 Classified
T750 Classified
T365 Classified
H335 Classified
H330 Classified
T360 Classified
T355
T350
T335 Classified
Classified
Classified
T325 Classified
T330
H325 Classified
SENIOR PLAN CHECKER Classified

PLAN CHECKER

SENIOR BUILDING INSPECTOR/STRUCTURAL

SENIOR BUILDING INSPECTOR/PLUMBING-MECHANICAL

SENIOR BUILDING INSPECTOR/ELECTRICAL

BUILDING INSPECTOR

PLAN CHECKING ENGINEER

SUPERVISING PLAN CHECKER AND EXPEDITOR

HOUSING MANAGER

HOUSING DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST

HOMEOWNERSHIP COORDINATOR

DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

CITY BUILDING OFFICIAL

SUPERVISING BUILDING INSPECTOR
Salaries Effective March 25, 2024 5

SALARY PLAN FOR ALL CLASSIFICATIONS
(PER MUNI CODE SEC.2-4.30)
FY 2024

PLANNING DIVISION
Hourly 78.98 82.93 87.07 91.40 96.00
Bi-Weekly 6,318.40 6,634.40 6,965.60 7,312.00 7,680.00
Monthly 13,689.87 14,374.53 15,092.13 15,842.67 16,640.00 Annual 164,278.40 172,494.40 181,105.60 190,112.00 199,680.00 Hourly 66.95 70.30 73.79 77.50 81.38
Bi-Weekly 5,356.00 5,624.00 5,903.20 6,200.00 6,510.40
Monthly 11,604.67 12,185.33 12,790.27 13,433.33 14,105.87 Annual 139,256.00 146,224.00 153,483.20 161,200.00 169,270.40 Hourly 59.99 62.97 66.12 69.43 72.89
Bi-Weekly 4,799.20 5,037.60 5,289.60 5,554.40 5,831.20
Monthly 10,398.27 10,914.80 11,460.80 12,034.53 12,634.27 Annual 124,779.20 130,977.60 137,529.60 144,414.40 151,611.20 Hourly 51.99 54.54 57.26 60.20 63.08
Bi-Weekly 4,159.20 4,363.20 4,580.80 4,816.00 5,046.40
Monthly 9,011.60 9,453.60 9,925.07 10,434.67 10,933.87
Annual 108,139.20 113,443.20 119,100.80 125,216.00 131,206.40 Hourly 42.67 44.75 47.16 49.47 51.99
Bi-Weekly 3,413.60 3,580.00 3,772.80 3,957.60 4,159.20
Monthly 7,396.13 7,756.67 8,174.40 8,574.80 9,011.60
Annual 88,753.60 93,080.00 98,092.80 102,897.60 108,139.20 Hourly 37.83 39.82 41.69 43.79 45.92
Bi-Weekly 3,026.40 3,185.60 3,335.20 3,503.20 3,673.60
Monthly 6,557.20 6,902.13 7,226.27 7,590.27 7,959.47
Annual 78,686.40 82,825.60 86,715.20 91,083.20 95,513.60 Hourly 52.50 55.03 58.06 60.91 64.01
Bi-Weekly 4,200.00 4,402.40 4,644.80 4,872.80 5,120.80
Monthly 9,100.00 9,538.53 10,063.73 10,557.73 11,095.07 Annual 109,200.00 114,462.40 120,764.80 126,692.80 133,140.80 Hourly 47.73 50.03 52.78 55.37 58.18
Bi-Weekly 3,818.40 4,002.40 4,222.40 4,429.60 4,654.40
Monthly 8,273.20 8,671.87 9,148.53 9,597.47 10,084.53
Annual 99,278.40 104,062.40 109,782.40 115,169.60 121,014.40 Hourly 68.63 72.05 75.66 79.44 83.43
Bi-Weekly 5,490.40 5,764.00 6,052.80 6,355.20 6,674.40
Monthly 11,895.87 12,488.67 13,114.40 13,769.60 14,461.20 Annual 142,750.40 149,864.00 157,372.80 165,235.20 173,534.40 Hourly 51.99 54.54 57.26 60.20 63.08
Bi-Weekly 4,159.20 4,363.20 4,580.80 4,816.00 5,046.40
Monthly 9,011.60 9,453.60 9,925.07 10,434.67 10,933.87
Annual 108,139.20 113,443.20 119,100.80 125,216.00 131,206.40

CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION
Hourly 59.40 62.37 65.47 68.74 72.17
Bi-Weekly 4,752.00 4,989.60 5,237.60 5,499.20 5,773.60
Monthly 10,296.00 10,810.80 11,348.13 11,914.93 12,509.47 Annual 123,552.00 129,729.60 136,177.60 142,979.20 150,113.60 Hourly 51.63 54.22 56.94 59.77 62.77
Bi-Weekly 4,130.40 4,337.60 4,555.20 4,781.60 5,021.60
Monthly 8,949.20 9,398.13 9,869.60 10,360.13 10,880.13
Annual 107,390.40 112,777.60 118,435.20 124,321.60 130,561.60 Hourly 50.99 53.54 56.21 59.02 61.97
Bi-Weekly 4,079.20 4,283.20 4,496.80 4,721.60 4,957.60
Monthly 8,838.27 9,280.27 9,743.07 10,230.13 10,741.47
Annual 106,059.20 111,363.20 116,916.80 122,761.60 128,897.60 Hourly 46.35 48.65 51.07 53.64 56.31
Bi-Weekly 3,708.00 3,892.00 4,085.60 4,291.20 4,504.80
Monthly 8,034.00 8,432.67 8,852.13 9,297.60 9,760.40
Annual 96,408.00 101,192.00 106,225.60 111,571.20 117,124.80 Hourly 42.13 44.23 46.42 48.75 51.21
Bi-Weekly 3,370.40 3,538.40 3,713.60 3,900.00 4,096.80
Monthly 7,302.53 7,666.53 8,046.13 8,450.00 8,876.40
Annual 87,630.40 91,998.40 96,553.60 101,400.00 106,516.80 H340 Classified
C199 Classified
C200 Classified
C205 Classified
T315 Classified
H310 Classified
H320 Classified
H315 Classified
T320 Classified
T310
T305
Classified
Classified
T605 Classified
T600 Classified
T370
H300 Classified
Classified
H703 Classified
H700 Classified
T610 Classified
T322 Classified

CODE ENFORCEMENT INSPECTOR II

CODE ENFORCEMENT INSPECTOR I

DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SPECIALIST

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT

ASSOCIATE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT

CODE ENFORCEMENT MANAGER

CODE ENFORCEMENT SUPERVISOR

SENIOR CODE ENFORCEMENT INSPECTOR

PLANNING MANAGER

PRINCIPAL PLANNER

SENIOR PLANNER

ASSOCIATE PLANNER

ASSISTANT PLANNER

JUNIOR PLANNER

SENIOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SPECIALIST

SUPERVISING PERMIT TECHNICIAN

SENIOR PERMIT TECHNICIAN

PERMIT TECHNICIAN II

PERMIT TECHNICIAN I
Salaries Effective March 25, 2024 6

SALARY PLAN FOR ALL CLASSIFICATIONS
(PER MUNI CODE SEC.2-4.30)
FY 2024

ATTACHMENT III
Recommended by
Personnel Commission
on March 14, 2024
Approved by Council
on March 26, 2024
Classification Title Job Code Service Type Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E

FINANCE DEPARTMENT

ADMINISTRATION DIVISION
Hourly 80.12 84.12 88.33 92.75 97.37
Bi-Weekly 6,409.60 6,729.60 7,066.40 7,420.00 7,789.60
Monthly 13,887.47 14,580.80 15,310.53 16,076.67 16,877.47 Annual 166,649.60 174,969.60 183,726.40 192,920.00 202,529.60 Hourly 64.18 67.41 70.76 74.30 77.99
Bi-Weekly 5,134.40 5,392.80 5,660.80 5,944.00 6,239.20
Monthly 11,124.53 11,684.40 12,265.07 12,878.67 13,518.27 Annual 133,494.40 140,212.80 147,180.80 154,544.00 162,219.20 Hourly 53.29 55.94 58.72 61.66 64.75
Bi-Weekly 4,263.20 4,475.20 4,697.60 4,932.80 5,180.00
Monthly 9,236.93 9,696.27 10,178.13 10,687.73 11,223.33 Annual 110,843.20 116,355.20 122,137.60 128,252.80 134,680.00 Hourly 40.71 42.74 44.87 47.11 49.49
Bi-Weekly 3,256.80 3,419.20 3,589.60 3,768.80 3,959.20
Monthly 7,056.40 7,408.27 7,777.47 8,165.73 8,578.27
Annual 84,676.80 88,899.20 93,329.60 97,988.80 102,939.20

ACCOUNTING DIVISION
Hourly 72.83 76.45 80.27 84.28 88.52
Bi-Weekly 5,826.40 6,116.00 6,421.60 6,742.40 7,081.60
Monthly 12,623.87 13,251.33 13,913.47 14,608.53 15,343.47 Annual 151,486.40 159,016.00 166,961.60 175,302.40 184,121.60 Hourly 53.60 56.26 59.06 62.01 65.10
Bi-Weekly 4,288.00 4,500.80 4,724.80 4,960.80 5,208.00
Monthly 9,290.67 9,751.73 10,237.07 10,748.40 11,284.00 Annual 111,488.00 117,020.80 122,844.80 128,980.80 135,408.00 Hourly 48.70 51.12 53.69 56.35 59.19
Bi-Weekly 3,896.00 4,089.60 4,295.20 4,508.00 4,735.20
Monthly 8,441.33 8,860.80 9,306.27 9,767.33 10,259.60
Annual 101,296.00 106,329.60 111,675.20 117,208.00 123,115.20 Hourly 35.25 36.96 38.57 40.41 42.30
Bi-Weekly 2,820.00 2,956.80 3,085.60 3,232.80 3,384.00
Monthly 6,110.00 6,406.40 6,685.47 7,004.40 7,332.00
Annual 73,320.00 76,876.80 80,225.60 84,052.80 87,984.00 Hourly 32.11 33.55 35.12 36.73 38.59
Bi-Weekly 2,568.80 2,684.00 2,809.60 2,938.40 3,087.20
Monthly 5,565.73 5,815.33 6,087.47 6,366.53 6,688.93
Annual 66,788.80 69,784.00 73,049.60 76,398.40 80,267.20

REVENUE DIVISION
Hourly 70.71 74.22 77.93 81.83 85.93
Bi-Weekly 5,656.80 5,937.60 6,234.40 6,546.40 6,874.40
Monthly 12,256.40 12,864.80 13,507.87 14,183.87 14,894.53 Annual 147,076.80 154,377.60 162,094.40 170,206.40 178,734.40 Hourly 53.29 55.95 58.73 61.65 64.75
Bi-Weekly 4,263.20 4,476.00 4,698.40 4,932.00 5,180.00
Monthly 9,236.93 9,698.00 10,179.87 10,686.00 11,223.33 Annual 110,843.20 116,376.00 122,158.40 128,232.00 134,680.00 Hourly 38.27 40.20 42.18 44.30 46.53
Bi-Weekly 3,061.60 3,216.00 3,374.40 3,544.00 3,722.40
Monthly 6,633.47 6,968.00 7,311.20 7,678.67 8,065.20
Annual 79,601.60 83,616.00 87,734.40 92,144.00 96,782.40 Hourly 35.25 36.96 38.57 40.41 42.30
Bi-Weekly 2,820.00 2,956.80 3,085.60 3,232.80 3,384.00
Monthly 6,110.00 6,406.40 6,685.47 7,004.40 7,332.00
Annual 73,320.00 76,876.80 80,225.60 84,052.80 87,984.00 Hourly 32.11 33.55 35.12 36.73 38.59
Bi-Weekly 2,568.80 2,684.00 2,809.60 2,938.40 3,087.20
Monthly 5,565.73 5,815.33 6,087.47 6,366.53 6,688.93
Annual 66,788.80 69,784.00 73,049.60 76,398.40 80,267.20 Hourly 27.10 28.55 29.99 31.59 33.24
Bi-Weekly 2,168.00 2,284.00 2,399.20 2,527.20 2,659.20
Monthly 4,697.33 4,948.67 5,198.27 5,475.60 5,761.60
Annual 56,368.00 59,384.00 62,379.20 65,707.20 69,139.20

PURCHASING DIVISION
Hourly 67.22 70.58 74.11 77.81 81.67
Bi-Weekly 5,377.60 5,646.40 5,928.80 6,224.80 6,533.60
Monthly 11,651.47 12,233.87 12,845.73 13,487.07 14,156.13 Annual 139,817.60 146,806.40 154,148.80 161,844.80 169,873.60 Hourly 40.73 42.78 44.87 47.09 49.49
Bi-Weekly 3,258.40 3,422.40 3,589.60 3,767.20 3,959.20
Monthly 7,059.87 7,415.20 7,777.47 8,162.27 8,578.27
Annual 84,718.40 88,982.40 93,329.60 97,947.20 102,939.20 Hourly 29.23 30.70 32.13 33.81 35.46
Bi-Weekly 2,338.40 2,456.00 2,570.40 2,704.80 2,836.80
Monthly 5,066.53 5,321.33 5,569.20 5,860.40 6,146.40
Annual 60,798.40 63,856.00 66,830.40 70,324.80 73,756.80 H165 Classified
C320 Classified
U500
H170
Classified
Classified
H140
H145 Classified
Classified
H150 Classified
H160
H155
Classified
Classified
C305 Classified
C300 Classified
C332
C330
C325
C322
Classified
Classified
Classified
Classified
H180 Classified
C345 Classified
C335 Classified

PURCHASING TECHNICIAN

MAIL AND PURCHASING CLERK

FINANCE SUPERVISOR

SUPERVISING CUSTOMER ACCOUNT CLERK

SENIOR CUSTOMER ACCOUNT CLERK

CUSTOMER ACCOUNT CLERK

MAIL AND REVENUE CLERK

PURCHASING AND SERVICES MANAGER

ACCOUNTING MANAGER

SENIOR ACCOUNTANT

ACCOUNTANT

SENIOR ACCOUNT CLERK

ACCOUNT CLERK

REVENUE MANAGER

DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE

BUDGET OFFICER

FINANCIAL ANALYST

FINANCE TECHNICIAN
Salaries Effective March 25, 2024 7

SALARY PLAN FOR ALL CLASSIFICATIONS
(PER MUNI CODE SEC.2-4.30)
FY 2024

ATTACHMENT III
Recommended by
Personnel Commission
on March 14, 2024
Approved by Council
on March 26, 2024
Classification Title Job Code Service Type Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E

FIRE DEPARTMENT
SWORN
Hourly 126.74 133.08 139.73 146.72 154.04
Bi-Weekly 10,139.20 10,646.40 11,178.40 11,737.60 12,323.20 Monthly 21,968.27 23,067.20 24,219.87 25,431.47 26,700.27 Annual 263,619.20 276,806.40 290,638.40 305,177.60 320,403.20 Hourly 102.03 107.13 112.50 118.12 124.01
Bi-Weekly 8,162.40 8,570.40 9,000.00 9,449.60 9,920.80
Monthly 17,685.20 18,569.20 19,500.00 20,474.13 21,495.07 Annual 212,222.40 222,830.40 234,000.00 245,689.60 257,940.80 Hourly 110.21 115.72 121.50 127.57 133.95
Bi-Weekly 8,816.80 9,257.60 9,720.00 10,205.60 10,716.00 Monthly 19,103.07 20,058.13 21,060.00 22,112.13 23,218.00 Annual 229,236.80 240,697.60 252,720.00 265,345.60 278,616.00 Hourly 110.21 115.72 121.50 127.57 133.95
Bi-Weekly 8,816.80 9,257.60 9,720.00 10,205.60 10,716.00 Monthly 19,103.07 20,058.13 21,060.00 22,112.13 23,218.00 Annual 229,236.80 240,697.60 252,720.00 265,345.60 278,616.00 Hourly 71.55 75.14 78.89 82.84 86.99
Bi-Weekly 8,013.60 8,415.68 8,835.68 9,278.08 9,742.88
Monthly 17,362.80 18,233.97 19,143.97 20,102.51 21,109.57 Annual 208,353.60 218,807.68 229,727.68 241,230.08 253,314.88 Hourly 100.17 105.18 110.46 115.98 121.76
Bi-Weekly 8,013.60 8,414.40 8,836.80 9,278.40 9,740.80
Monthly 17,362.80 18,231.20 19,146.40 20,103.20 21,105.07 Annual 208,353.60 218,774.40 229,756.80 241,238.40 253,260.80 Hourly 96.46 101.29 106.36
Bi-Weekly 7,716.80 8,103.20 8,508.80
Monthly 16,719.73 17,556.93 18,435.73
Annual 200,636.80 210,683.20 221,228.80
Hourly 89.30 93.78 98.46
Bi-Weekly 7,144.00 7,502.40 7,876.80
Monthly 15,478.67 16,255.20 17,066.40
Annual 185,744.00 195,062.40 204,796.80
Hourly 62.62 65.75 69.06
Bi-Weekly 7,013.44 7,364.00 7,734.72
Monthly 15,195.79 15,955.33 16,758.56
Annual 182,349.44 191,464.00 201,102.72
Hourly 87.70 92.07 96.66
Bi-Weekly 7,016.00 7,365.60 7,732.80
Monthly 15,201.33 15,958.80 16,754.40
Annual 182,416.00 191,505.60 201,052.80
Hourly 53.08 55.70 58.48 61.41 64.47
Bi-Weekly 5,944.96 6,238.40 6,549.76 6,877.92 7,220.64
Monthly 12,880.75 13,516.53 14,191.15 14,902.16 15,644.72 Annual 154,568.96 162,198.40 170,293.76 178,825.92 187,736.64 Hourly 68.73 72.17 75.79 79.59 83.56
Bi-Weekly 5,498.40 5,773.60 6,063.20 6,367.20 6,684.80
Monthly 11,913.20 12,509.47 13,136.93 13,795.60 14,483.73 Annual 142,958.40 150,113.60 157,643.20 165,547.20 173,804.80 Hourly 74.23 77.96 81.85 85.95 90.22
Bi-Weekly 5,938.40 6,236.80 6,548.00 6,876.00 7,217.60
Monthly 12,866.53 13,513.07 14,187.33 14,898.00 15,638.13 Annual 154,398.40 162,156.80 170,248.00 178,776.00 187,657.60 Hourly 50.23 52.75 55.38 58.16 61.07
Bi-Weekly 5,625.76 5,908.00 6,202.56 6,513.92 6,839.84
Monthly 12,189.15 12,800.67 13,438.88 14,113.49 14,819.65 Annual 146,269.76 153,608.00 161,266.56 169,361.92 177,835.84 Hourly 46.54 48.83 51.29 53.84 56.54
Bi-Weekly 5,212.48 5,468.96 5,744.48 6,030.08 6,332.48
Monthly 11,293.71 11,849.41 12,446.37 13,065.17 13,720.37 Annual 135,524.48 142,192.96 149,356.48 156,782.08 164,644.48 Hourly 70.26 73.78 77.46 81.33 85.41
Bi-Weekly 5,620.80 5,902.40 6,196.80 6,506.40 6,832.80
Monthly 12,178.40 12,788.53 13,426.40 14,097.20 14,804.40 Annual 146,140.80 153,462.40 161,116.80 169,166.40 177,652.80 Hourly 47.34 49.72 52.19 54.82 57.57
Bi-Weekly 5,302.08 5,568.64 5,845.28 6,139.84 6,447.84
Monthly 11,487.84 12,065.39 12,664.77 13,302.99 13,970.32 Annual 137,854.08 144,784.64 151,977.28 159,635.84 167,643.84 Hourly 66.30 69.60 73.07 76.73 80.58
Bi-Weekly 5,304.00 5,568.00 5,845.60 6,138.40 6,446.40
Monthly 11,492.00 12,064.00 12,665.47 13,299.87 13,967.20 Annual 137,904.00 144,768.00 151,985.60 159,598.40 167,606.40 Hourly 57.42 60.28
Bi-Weekly 4,593.60 4,822.40
Monthly 9,952.80 10,448.53
Annual 119,433.60 125,382.40
Classified
F401 Classified
F600
F415 Classified
F400 Classified
F420 Classified
F410 Classified
F225 Classified
F250 Classified
Classified
Classified
F245 Classified
F241
F240
F221 Classified
F220 Classified
F210 Classified
F200 Classified
F211 Classified
F215 Classified
F100 Classified
F205 Classified
FIREFIGHTER (56 HR)
FIREFIGHTER (40 HR)
FIREFIGHTER TRAINEE (40 HR)
FIRE PREVENTION INSPECTOR (56 HR)
FIRE PREVENTION INSPECTOR - EMT (40 HR)
FIRE PREVENTION INSPECTOR (40 HR)
APPARATUS OPERATOR (56 HR)
APPARATUS OPERATOR - EMT (56 HR)
APPARATUS OPERATOR (40 HR)
BATTALION CHIEF (56 HR)
BATTALION CHIEF (40 HR)
STAFF FIRE CAPTAIN (40 HR)
STAFF FIRE CAPTAIN - EMT (40 HR)
FIRE CAPTAIN (56 HR)
FIRE CAPTAIN (40 HR)
DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF (40 HR)
FIRE MARSHAL - EMT (40 HR)
FIRE MARSHAL (40 HR)
FIRE TRAINING OFFICER (40 HR)
Salaries Effective March 25, 2024 8

SALARY PLAN FOR ALL CLASSIFICATIONS
(PER MUNI CODE SEC.2-4.30)
FY 2024

ATTACHMENT III
Recommended by
Personnel Commission
on March 14, 2024
Approved by Council
on March 26, 2024
Classification Title Job Code Service Type Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E

PROFESSIONAL STAFF
Hourly 68.27 71.68 75.26 79.03 82.97
Bi-Weekly 5,461.60 5,734.40 6,020.80 6,322.40 6,637.60
Monthly 11,833.47 12,424.53 13,045.07 13,698.53 14,381.47 Annual 142,001.60 149,094.40 156,540.80 164,382.40 172,577.60 Hourly 71.81 75.39 79.19 83.13 87.28
Bi-Weekly 5,744.80 6,031.20 6,335.20 6,650.40 6,982.40
Monthly 12,447.07 13,067.60 13,726.27 14,409.20 15,128.53 Annual 149,364.80 156,811.20 164,715.20 172,910.40 181,542.40 Hourly 59.88 62.77 65.94 69.38 72.90
Bi-Weekly 4,790.40 5,021.60 5,275.20 5,550.40 5,832.00
Monthly 10,379.20 10,880.13 11,429.60 12,025.87 12,636.00 Annual 124,550.40 130,561.60 137,155.20 144,310.40 151,632.00 Hourly 58.33 61.25 64.28 67.49 70.89
Bi-Weekly 4,666.40 4,900.00 5,142.40 5,399.20 5,671.20
Monthly 10,110.53 10,616.67 11,141.87 11,698.27 12,287.60 Annual 121,326.40 127,400.00 133,702.40 140,379.20 147,451.20 Hourly 58.39 61.30 64.37 67.60 70.98
Bi-Weekly 4,671.20 4,904.00 5,149.60 5,408.00 5,678.40
Monthly 10,120.93 10,625.33 11,157.47 11,717.33 12,303.20 Annual 121,451.20 127,504.00 133,889.60 140,608.00 147,638.40 Hourly 55.63 58.40 61.33 64.40 67.60
Bi-Weekly 4,450.40 4,672.00 4,906.40 5,152.00 5,408.00
Monthly 9,642.53 10,122.67 10,630.53 11,162.67 11,717.33 Annual 115,710.40 121,472.00 127,566.40 133,952.00 140,608.00 Hourly 60.12 63.14 66.27 69.57 73.07
Bi-Weekly 4,809.60 5,051.20 5,301.60 5,565.60 5,845.60
Monthly 10,420.80 10,944.27 11,486.80 12,058.80 12,665.47 Annual 125,049.60 131,331.20 137,841.60 144,705.60 151,985.60 Hourly 42.21 43.95 45.65 47.63 50.05
Bi-Weekly 3,376.80 3,516.00 3,652.00 3,810.40 4,004.00
Monthly 7,316.40 7,618.00 7,912.67 8,255.87 8,675.33
Annual 87,796.80 91,416.00 94,952.00 99,070.40 104,104.00 Hourly 37.13 38.98 40.93 42.99 45.12
Bi-Weekly 2,970.40 3,118.40 3,274.40 3,439.20 3,609.60
Monthly 6,435.87 6,756.53 7,094.53 7,451.60 7,820.80
Annual 77,230.40 81,078.40 85,134.40 89,419.20 93,849.60 Hourly 33.73 35.41 37.18 39.04 41.00
Bi-Weekly 2,698.40 2,832.80 2,974.40 3,123.20 3,280.00
Monthly 5,846.53 6,137.73 6,444.53 6,766.93 7,106.67
Annual 70,158.40 73,652.80 77,334.40 81,203.20 85,280.00

HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Hourly 83.82 88.00 92.40 97.03 101.87
Bi-Weekly 6,705.60 7,040.00 7,392.00 7,762.40 8,149.60
Monthly 14,528.80 15,253.33 16,016.00 16,818.53 17,657.47 Annual 174,345.60 183,040.00 192,192.00 201,822.40 211,889.60 Hourly 76.18 79.99 83.99 88.19 92.60
Bi-Weekly 6,094.40 6,399.20 6,719.20 7,055.20 7,408.00
Monthly 13,204.53 13,864.93 14,558.27 15,286.27 16,050.67 Annual 158,454.40 166,379.20 174,699.20 183,435.20 192,608.00 Hourly 60.13 63.11 66.26 69.58 73.06
Bi-Weekly 4,810.40 5,048.80 5,300.80 5,566.40 5,844.80
Monthly 10,422.53 10,939.07 11,485.07 12,060.53 12,663.73 Annual 125,070.40 131,268.80 137,820.80 144,726.40 151,964.80 Hourly 54.67 57.40 60.28 63.27 66.44
Bi-Weekly 4,373.60 4,592.00 4,822.40 5,061.60 5,315.20
Monthly 9,476.13 9,949.33 10,448.53 10,966.80 11,516.27 Annual 113,713.60 119,392.00 125,382.40 131,601.60 138,195.20 Hourly 49.70 52.20 54.80 57.52 60.40
Bi-Weekly 3,976.00 4,176.00 4,384.00 4,601.60 4,832.00
Monthly 8,614.67 9,048.00 9,498.67 9,970.13 10,469.33
Annual 103,376.00 108,576.00 113,984.00 119,641.60 125,632.00 Hourly 45.20 47.46 49.84 52.31 54.91
Bi-Weekly 3,616.00 3,796.80 3,987.20 4,184.80 4,392.80
Monthly 7,834.67 8,226.40 8,638.93 9,067.07 9,517.73
Annual 94,016.00 98,716.80 103,667.20 108,804.80 114,212.80 Hourly 45.84 47.72 49.60 51.47 53.51
Bi-Weekly 3,667.20 3,817.60 3,968.00 4,117.60 4,280.80
Monthly 7,945.60 8,271.47 8,597.33 8,921.47 9,275.07
Annual 95,347.20 99,257.60 103,168.00 107,057.60 111,300.80 H590 Classified
T505 Classified
H585 Classified
T510 Classified
C260 Classified
H580 Classified
T500 Classified
U520 Classified
C250 Classified
C255 Classified
Classified
Classified
U115 Classified
U120
U135
U105 Classified
U100 Classified
U110 Classified

HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT

DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES

HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGER

SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST

HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST II

HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST I

HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNICIAN

ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INSPECTOR

FIRE SERVICES SUPERVISOR

SENIOR FIRE TECHNICIAN

FIRE TECHNICIAN II

FIRE TECHNICIAN I

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PROGRAM COORDINATOR

FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER

EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES COORDINATOR
SENIOR FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER T515 Classified
Salaries Effective March 25, 2024 9

SALARY PLAN FOR ALL CLASSIFICATIONS
(PER MUNI CODE SEC.2-4.30)
FY 2024

ATTACHMENT III
Recommended by
Personnel Commission
on March 14, 2024
Approved by Council
on March 26, 2024
Classification Title Job Code Service Type Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E

LIBRARY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Hourly 80.12 84.12 88.33 92.75 97.37
Bi-Weekly 6,409.60 6,729.60 7,066.40 7,420.00 7,789.60
Monthly 13,887.47 14,580.80 15,310.53 16,076.67 16,877.47 Annual 166,649.60 174,969.60 183,726.40 192,920.00 202,529.60

LIBRARY SERVICES DIVISION
Hourly 55.63 58.40 61.32 64.37 67.59
Bi-Weekly 4,450.40 4,672.00 4,905.60 5,149.60 5,407.20
Monthly 9,642.53 10,122.67 10,628.80 11,157.47 11,715.60 Annual 115,710.40 121,472.00 127,545.60 133,889.60 140,587.20 Hourly 52.08 54.68 57.41 60.27 63.29
Bi-Weekly 4,166.40 4,374.40 4,592.80 4,821.60 5,063.20
Monthly 9,027.20 9,477.87 9,951.07 10,446.80 10,970.27
Annual 108,326.40 113,734.40 119,412.80 125,361.60 131,643.20 Hourly 40.06 42.07 44.09 46.34 48.52
Bi-Weekly 3,204.80 3,365.60 3,527.20 3,707.20 3,881.60
Monthly 6,943.73 7,292.13 7,642.27 8,032.27 8,410.13
Annual 83,324.80 87,505.60 91,707.20 96,387.20 100,921.60 Hourly 36.33 38.15 40.06 41.96 44.10
Bi-Weekly 2,906.40 3,052.00 3,204.80 3,356.80 3,528.00
Monthly 6,297.20 6,612.67 6,943.73 7,273.07 7,644.00
Annual 75,566.40 79,352.00 83,324.80 87,276.80 91,728.00 Hourly 35.34 37.13 38.90 40.80 42.96
Bi-Weekly 2,827.20 2,970.40 3,112.00 3,264.00 3,436.80
Monthly 6,125.60 6,435.87 6,742.67 7,072.00 7,446.40
Annual 73,507.20 77,230.40 80,912.00 84,864.00 89,356.80 Hourly 32.63 34.08 35.64 37.20 39.00
Bi-Weekly 2,610.40 2,726.40 2,851.20 2,976.00 3,120.00
Monthly 5,655.87 5,907.20 6,177.60 6,448.00 6,760.00
Annual 67,870.40 70,886.40 74,131.20 77,376.00 81,120.00 Hourly 29.57 30.94 32.34 33.82 35.41
Bi-Weekly 2,365.60 2,475.20 2,587.20 2,705.60 2,832.80
Monthly 5,125.47 5,362.93 5,605.60 5,862.13 6,137.73
Annual 61,505.60 64,355.20 67,267.20 70,345.60 73,652.80 Hourly 23.78
Bi-Weekly 1,141.44
Monthly 2,473.12
Annual 29,677.44
Hourly 21.61
Bi-Weekly 518.64
Monthly 1,123.72
Annual 13,484.64
Hourly 52.08 54.68 57.41 60.27 63.29
Bi-Weekly 4,166.40 4,374.40 4,592.80 4,821.60 5,063.20
Monthly 9,027.20 9,477.87 9,951.07 10,446.80 10,970.27
Annual 108,326.40 113,734.40 119,412.80 125,361.60 131,643.20 Hourly 35.50 37.29 39.17 41.11 43.18
Bi-Weekly 2,840.00 2,983.20 3,133.60 3,288.80 3,454.40
Monthly 6,153.33 6,463.60 6,789.47 7,125.73 7,484.53
Annual 73,840.00 77,563.20 81,473.60 85,508.80 89,814.40 Hourly 35.54 37.35 39.20 41.07 43.18
Bi-Weekly 2,843.20 2,988.00 3,136.00 3,285.60 3,454.40
Monthly 6,160.27 6,474.00 6,794.67 7,118.80 7,484.53
Annual 73,923.20 77,688.00 81,536.00 85,425.60 89,814.40 Hourly 35.34 37.13 38.90 40.80 42.96
Bi-Weekly 2,827.20 2,970.40 3,112.00 3,264.00 3,436.80
Monthly 6,125.60 6,435.87 6,742.67 7,072.00 7,446.40
Annual 73,507.20 77,230.40 80,912.00 84,864.00 89,356.80 Hourly 29.57 30.94 32.34 33.82 35.41
Bi-Weekly 2,365.60 2,475.20 2,587.20 2,705.60 2,832.80
Monthly 5,125.47 5,362.93 5,605.60 5,862.13 6,137.73
Annual 61,505.60 64,355.20 67,267.20 70,345.60 73,652.80 T795 Classified
H750 Classified
H755 Classified
C515
C510 Classified
Classified
T790 Classified
C520 Classified
H760 Classified
Classified
Classified
C505
C500
C506 Classified
C508 Classified
Classified
T785 Classified
T780

LITERACY PROGRAM COORDINATOR

LEAD PROGRAM ASSISTANT

PROGRAM ASSISTANT

SENIOR LIBRARY ASSISTANT

LIBRARY ASSISTANT
SENIOR LIBRARY PAGE (.6 FTE)
LIBRARY PAGE (.3 FTE)

EDUCATION SERVICES MANAGER

EDUCATIONAL SERVICES COORDINATOR

LIBRARY OPERATIONS MANAGER

SUPERVISING LIBRARIAN I

LIBRARIAN II

LIBRARIAN I

LEAD LIBRARY ASSISTANT
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LIBRARY SERVICES U535 Classified
Salaries Effective March 25, 2024 10

SALARY PLAN FOR ALL CLASSIFICATIONS
(PER MUNI CODE SEC.2-4.30)
FY 2024

ATTACHMENT III
Recommended by
Personnel Commission
on March 14, 2024
Approved by Council
on March 26, 2024
Classification Title Job Code Service Type Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E

MAINTENANCE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Hourly 84.49 88.71 93.17 97.82 102.72
Bi-Weekly 6,759.20 7,096.80 7,453.60 7,825.60 8,217.60
Monthly 14,644.93 15,376.40 16,149.47 16,955.47 17,804.80 Annual 175,739.20 184,516.80 193,793.60 203,465.60 213,657.60

FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
Hourly 67.49 70.84 74.39 78.12 82.03
Bi-Weekly 5,399.20 5,667.20 5,951.20 6,249.60 6,562.40
Monthly 11,698.27 12,278.93 12,894.27 13,540.80 14,218.53 Annual 140,379.20 147,347.20 154,731.20 162,489.60 170,622.40 Hourly 63.46 65.99 68.54 71.37 74.40
Bi-Weekly 5,076.80 5,279.20 5,483.20 5,709.60 5,952.00
Monthly 10,999.73 11,438.27 11,880.27 12,370.80 12,896.00 Annual 131,996.80 137,259.20 142,563.20 148,449.60 154,752.00 Hourly 51.05 53.08 55.17 57.52 59.89
Bi-Weekly 4,084.00 4,246.40 4,413.60 4,601.60 4,791.20
Monthly 8,848.67 9,200.53 9,562.80 9,970.13 10,380.93
Annual 106,184.00 110,406.40 114,753.60 119,641.60 124,571.20 Hourly 44.78 46.61 48.43 50.43 52.54
Bi-Weekly 3,582.40 3,728.80 3,874.40 4,034.40 4,203.20
Monthly 7,761.87 8,079.07 8,394.53 8,741.20 9,106.93
Annual 93,142.40 96,948.80 100,734.40 104,894.40 109,283.20 Hourly 40.74 42.41 44.10 45.94 47.78
Bi-Weekly 3,259.20 3,392.80 3,528.00 3,675.20 3,822.40
Monthly 7,061.60 7,351.07 7,644.00 7,962.93 8,281.87
Annual 84,739.20 88,212.80 91,728.00 95,555.20 99,382.40 Hourly 44.48 46.24 48.16 50.16 52.25
Bi-Weekly 3,558.40 3,699.20 3,852.80 4,012.80 4,180.00
Monthly 7,709.87 8,014.93 8,347.73 8,694.40 9,056.67
Annual 92,518.40 96,179.20 100,172.80 104,332.80 108,680.00 Hourly 40.46 42.13 43.86 45.63 47.54
Bi-Weekly 3,236.80 3,370.40 3,508.80 3,650.40 3,803.20
Monthly 7,013.07 7,302.53 7,602.40 7,909.20 8,240.27
Annual 84,156.80 87,630.40 91,228.80 94,910.40 98,883.20 Hourly 36.06 37.49 39.02 40.39 41.96
Bi-Weekly 2,884.80 2,999.20 3,121.60 3,231.20 3,356.80
Monthly 6,250.40 6,498.27 6,763.47 7,000.93 7,273.07
Annual 75,004.80 77,979.20 81,161.60 84,011.20 87,276.80 Hourly 32.78 34.09 35.46 36.73 38.14
Bi-Weekly 2,622.40 2,727.20 2,836.80 2,938.40 3,051.20
Monthly 5,681.87 5,908.93 6,146.40 6,366.53 6,610.93
Annual 68,182.40 70,907.20 73,756.80 76,398.40 79,331.20

FLEET MANAGEMENT DIVISION
Hourly 67.49 70.84 74.39 78.12 82.03
Bi-Weekly 5,399.20 5,667.20 5,951.20 6,249.60 6,562.40
Monthly 11,698.27 12,278.93 12,894.27 13,540.80 14,218.53 Annual 140,379.20 147,347.20 154,731.20 162,489.60 170,622.40 Hourly 45.64 47.78 50.19 52.80 55.41
Bi-Weekly 3,651.20 3,822.40 4,015.20 4,224.00 4,432.80
Monthly 7,910.93 8,281.87 8,699.60 9,152.00 9,604.40
Annual 94,931.20 99,382.40 104,395.20 109,824.00 115,252.80 Hourly 39.32 41.16 43.25 45.51 47.75
Bi-Weekly 3,145.60 3,292.80 3,460.00 3,640.80 3,820.00
Monthly 6,815.47 7,134.40 7,496.67 7,888.40 8,276.67
Annual 81,785.60 85,612.80 89,960.00 94,660.80 99,320.00 Hourly 35.79 37.59 39.52 41.46 43.51
Bi-Weekly 2,863.20 3,007.20 3,161.60 3,316.80 3,480.80
Monthly 6,203.60 6,515.60 6,850.13 7,186.40 7,541.73
Annual 74,443.20 78,187.20 82,201.60 86,236.80 90,500.80 Hourly 33.34 35.13 36.81 38.68 40.65
Bi-Weekly 2,667.20 2,810.40 2,944.80 3,094.40 3,252.00
Monthly 5,778.93 6,089.20 6,380.40 6,704.53 7,046.00
Annual 69,347.20 73,070.40 76,564.80 80,454.40 84,552.00 Hourly 30.78 31.98 33.31 34.44 35.77
Bi-Weekly 2,462.40 2,558.40 2,664.80 2,755.20 2,861.60
Monthly 5,335.20 5,543.20 5,773.73 5,969.60 6,200.13
Annual 64,022.40 66,518.40 69,284.80 71,635.20 74,401.60 M130 Classified
M140 Classified
H605 Classified
M135 Classified
M125 Classified
M120 Classified
M115 Classified
M620 Classified
H635 Classified
M110 Classified
M105 Classified
Classified
M600 Classified
M605
M615
M610 Classified
Classified

FLEET MAINTENANCE MANAGER

SENIOR EQUIPMENT MECHANIC

EQUIPMENT MECHANIC II

EQUIPMENT MECHANIC I

EQUIPMENT PARTS STOREKEEPER

EQUIPMENT SERVICE ATTENDANT

FACILITIES PAINTER II

FACILITIES PAINTER I

FACILITIES CARPENTER II

FACILITIES CARPENTER I

FACILITIES SERVICEWORKER II

FACILITIES SERVICEWORKER I

FACILITIES AND BUILDING MANAGER

FACILITIES LEADWORKER

HVAC MECHANIC
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE SERVICES U540 Classified Salaries Effective March 25, 2024 11

SALARY PLAN FOR ALL CLASSIFICATIONS
(PER MUNI CODE SEC.2-4.30)
FY 2024

ATTACHMENT III
Recommended by
Personnel Commission
on March 14, 2024
Approved by Council
on March 26, 2024
Classification Title Job Code Service Type Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DIVISION
Hourly 67.49 70.84 74.39 78.12 82.03
Bi-Weekly 5,399.20 5,667.20 5,951.20 6,249.60 6,562.40
Monthly 11,698.27 12,278.93 12,894.27 13,540.80 14,218.53 Annual 140,379.20 147,347.20 154,731.20 162,489.60 170,622.40 Hourly 53.28 55.41 57.65 59.72 62.00
Bi-Weekly 4,262.40 4,432.80 4,612.00 4,777.60 4,960.00
Monthly 9,235.20 9,604.40 9,992.67 10,351.47 10,746.67
Annual 110,822.40 115,252.80 119,912.00 124,217.60 128,960.00 Hourly 47.90 49.80 51.82 53.68 55.74
Bi-Weekly 3,832.00 3,984.00 4,145.60 4,294.40 4,459.20
Monthly 8,302.67 8,632.00 8,982.13 9,304.53 9,661.60
Annual 99,632.00 103,584.00 107,785.60 111,654.40 115,939.20 Hourly 41.65 43.32 45.07 46.66 48.46
Bi-Weekly 3,332.00 3,465.60 3,605.60 3,732.80 3,876.80
Monthly 7,219.33 7,508.80 7,812.13 8,087.73 8,399.73
Annual 86,632.00 90,105.60 93,745.60 97,052.80 100,796.80 Hourly 37.83 39.33 40.99 42.42 44.06
Bi-Weekly 3,026.40 3,146.40 3,279.20 3,393.60 3,524.80
Monthly 6,557.20 6,817.20 7,104.93 7,352.80 7,637.07
Annual 78,686.40 81,806.40 85,259.20 88,233.60 91,644.80 Hourly 41.65 43.32 45.07 46.66 48.46
Bi-Weekly 3,332.00 3,465.60 3,605.60 3,732.80 3,876.80
Monthly 7,219.33 7,508.80 7,812.13 8,087.73 8,399.73
Annual 86,632.00 90,105.60 93,745.60 97,052.80 100,796.80

STREET MAINTENANCE DIVISION
Hourly 67.49 70.84 74.39 78.12 82.03
Bi-Weekly 5,399.20 5,667.20 5,951.20 6,249.60 6,562.40
Monthly 11,698.27 12,278.93 12,894.27 13,540.80 14,218.53 Annual 140,379.20 147,347.20 154,731.20 162,489.60 170,622.40 Hourly 59.09 61.36 63.90 66.17 68.70
Bi-Weekly 4,727.20 4,908.80 5,112.00 5,293.60 5,496.00
Monthly 10,242.27 10,635.73 11,076.00 11,469.47 11,908.00 Annual 122,907.20 127,628.80 132,912.00 137,633.60 142,896.00 Hourly 52.72 54.76 57.04 59.05 61.31
Bi-Weekly 4,217.60 4,380.80 4,563.20 4,724.00 4,904.80
Monthly 9,138.13 9,491.73 9,886.93 10,235.33 10,627.07
Annual 109,657.60 113,900.80 118,643.20 122,824.00 127,524.80 Hourly 43.66 45.36 47.24 48.90 50.77
Bi-Weekly 3,492.80 3,628.80 3,779.20 3,912.00 4,061.60
Monthly 7,567.73 7,862.40 8,188.27 8,476.00 8,800.13
Annual 90,812.80 94,348.80 98,259.20 101,712.00 105,601.60 Hourly 45.73 47.27 49.19 51.28 53.31
Bi-Weekly 3,658.40 3,781.60 3,935.20 4,102.40 4,264.80
Monthly 7,926.53 8,193.47 8,526.27 8,888.53 9,240.40
Annual 95,118.40 98,321.60 102,315.20 106,662.40 110,884.80 Hourly 41.59 42.97 44.71 46.62 48.47
Bi-Weekly 3,327.20 3,437.60 3,576.80 3,729.60 3,877.60
Monthly 7,208.93 7,448.13 7,749.73 8,080.80 8,401.47
Annual 86,507.20 89,377.60 92,996.80 96,969.60 100,817.60

POLICE DEPARTMENT
SWORN
Hourly 110.74 116.26 122.10 128.19 134.58
Bi-Weekly 8,859.20 9,300.80 9,768.00 10,255.20 10,766.40 Monthly 19,194.93 20,151.73 21,164.00 22,219.60 23,327.20 Annual 230,339.20 241,820.80 253,968.00 266,635.20 279,926.40 Hourly 91.26 95.71
Bi-Weekly 7,300.80 7,656.80
Monthly 15,818.40 16,589.73
Annual 189,820.80 199,076.80
Hourly 78.18 81.95 86.16
Bi-Weekly 6,254.40 6,556.00 6,892.80
Monthly 13,551.20 14,204.67 14,934.40
Annual 162,614.40 170,456.00 179,212.80
Hourly 57.41 60.17 63.09 66.14 69.29
Bi-Weekly 4,592.80 4,813.60 5,047.20 5,291.20 5,543.20
Monthly 9,951.07 10,429.47 10,935.60 11,464.27 12,010.27 Annual 119,412.80 125,153.60 131,227.20 137,571.20 144,123.20 Hourly 40.39 42.39
Bi-Weekly 3,231.20 3,391.20
Monthly 7,000.93 7,347.60
Annual 84,011.20 88,171.20
M210 Classified
H615 Classified
H610 Classified
M215 Classified
M702 Classified
M700 Classified
H625 Classified
M220 Classified
M205 Classified
M310 Classified
M315 Classified
H620 Classified
P300
P215 Classified
Classified
P210 Classified
P200 Classified
P100 Classified

POLICE CAPTAIN

POLICE LIEUTENANT

POLICE SERGEANT

POLICE OFFICER

POLICE OFFICER TRAINEE

STREETS MAINTENANCE MANAGER

STREETS MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR

SENIOR MAINTENANCE LEADER

MAINTENANCE LEADER

LEAD SWEEPER EQUIPMENT OPERATOR

SWEEPER EQUIPMENT OPERATOR

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE MANAGER

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR

GROUNDSKEEPER III

GROUNDSKEEPER II

GROUNDSKEEPER I

TREE TRIMMER
Salaries Effective March 25, 2024 12

SALARY PLAN FOR ALL CLASSIFICATIONS
(PER MUNI CODE SEC.2-4.30)
FY 2024

ATTACHMENT III
Recommended by
Personnel Commission
on March 14, 2024
Approved by Council
on March 26, 2024
Classification Title Job Code Service Type Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E

PROFESSIONAL STAFF
Hourly 77.97 81.87 85.99 90.26 94.78
Bi-Weekly 6,237.60 6,549.60 6,879.20 7,220.80 7,582.40
Monthly 13,514.80 14,190.80 14,904.93 15,645.07 16,428.53 Annual 162,177.60 170,289.60 178,859.20 187,740.80 197,142.40 Hourly 48.03 49.98 51.94 53.90 56.05
Bi-Weekly 3,842.40 3,998.40 4,155.20 4,312.00 4,484.00
Monthly 8,325.20 8,663.20 9,002.93 9,342.67 9,715.33
Annual 99,902.40 103,958.40 108,035.20 112,112.00 116,584.00 Hourly 60.57 63.60 66.77 70.09 73.62
Bi-Weekly 4,845.60 5,088.00 5,341.60 5,607.20 5,889.60
Monthly 10,498.80 11,024.00 11,573.47 12,148.93 12,760.80 Annual 125,985.60 132,288.00 138,881.60 145,787.20 153,129.60 Hourly 60.12 63.09 66.26 69.56 73.04
Bi-Weekly 4,809.60 5,047.20 5,300.80 5,564.80 5,843.20
Monthly 10,420.80 10,935.60 11,485.07 12,057.07 12,660.27 Annual 125,049.60 131,227.20 137,820.80 144,684.80 151,923.20 Hourly 53.07 55.72 58.51 61.43 64.48
Bi-Weekly 4,245.60 4,457.60 4,680.80 4,914.40 5,158.40
Monthly 9,198.80 9,658.13 10,141.73 10,647.87 11,176.53 Annual 110,385.60 115,897.60 121,700.80 127,774.40 134,118.40 Hourly 54.66 57.39 60.26 63.27 66.41
Bi-Weekly 4,372.80 4,591.20 4,820.80 5,061.60 5,312.80
Monthly 9,474.40 9,947.60 10,445.07 10,966.80 11,511.07 Annual 113,692.80 119,371.20 125,340.80 131,601.60 138,132.80

SPECIAL OPERATIONS DIVISION
Hourly 40.90 42.93 45.09 47.36 49.72
Bi-Weekly 3,272.00 3,434.40 3,607.20 3,788.80 3,977.60
Monthly 7,089.33 7,441.20 7,815.60 8,209.07 8,618.13
Annual 85,072.00 89,294.40 93,787.20 98,508.80 103,417.60 Hourly 37.17 39.02 40.98 43.04 45.18
Bi-Weekly 2,973.60 3,121.60 3,278.40 3,443.20 3,614.40
Monthly 6,442.80 6,763.47 7,103.20 7,460.27 7,831.20
Annual 77,313.60 81,161.60 85,238.40 89,523.20 93,974.40 Hourly 70.93 74.47 78.20 81.97 86.16
Bi-Weekly 5,674.40 5,957.60 6,256.00 6,557.60 6,892.80
Monthly 12,294.53 12,908.13 13,554.67 14,208.13 14,934.40 Annual 147,534.40 154,897.60 162,656.00 170,497.60 179,212.80

INVESTIGATION DIVISION
Hourly 74.97 78.72 82.68 86.79 91.13
Bi-Weekly 5,997.60 6,297.60 6,614.40 6,943.20 7,290.40
Monthly 12,994.80 13,644.80 14,331.20 15,043.60 15,795.87 Annual 155,937.60 163,737.60 171,974.40 180,523.20 189,550.40 Hourly 55.06 57.82 60.70 63.72 66.93
Bi-Weekly 4,404.80 4,625.60 4,856.00 5,097.60 5,354.40
Monthly 9,543.73 10,022.13 10,521.33 11,044.80 11,601.20 Annual 114,524.80 120,265.60 126,256.00 132,537.60 139,214.40 Hourly 46.74 49.05 51.52 53.88 56.69
Bi-Weekly 3,739.20 3,924.00 4,121.60 4,310.40 4,535.20
Monthly 8,101.60 8,502.00 8,930.13 9,339.20 9,826.27
Annual 97,219.20 102,024.00 107,161.60 112,070.40 117,915.20 Hourly 44.51 46.71 49.07 51.31 53.99
Bi-Weekly 3,560.80 3,736.80 3,925.60 4,104.80 4,319.20
Monthly 7,715.07 8,096.40 8,505.47 8,893.73 9,358.27
Annual 92,580.80 97,156.80 102,065.60 106,724.80 112,299.20 Hourly 58.39 61.30 64.37 67.60 70.98
Bi-Weekly 4,671.20 4,904.00 5,149.60 5,408.00 5,678.40
Monthly 10,120.93 10,625.33 11,157.47 11,717.33 12,303.20 Annual 121,451.20 127,504.00 133,889.60 140,608.00 147,638.40

SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION
Hourly 86.68 91.00 96.50 101.31 106.35
Bi-Weekly 6,934.40 7,280.00 7,720.00 8,104.80 8,508.00
Monthly 15,024.53 15,773.33 16,726.67 17,560.40 18,434.00 Annual 180,294.40 189,280.00 200,720.00 210,724.80 221,208.00 Hourly 43.08 45.23 47.49 49.85 52.33
Bi-Weekly 3,446.40 3,618.40 3,799.20 3,988.00 4,186.40
Monthly 7,467.20 7,839.87 8,231.60 8,640.67 9,070.53
Annual 89,606.40 94,078.40 98,779.20 103,688.00 108,846.40 Hourly 39.24 41.20 43.27 45.45 47.59
Bi-Weekly 3,139.20 3,296.00 3,461.60 3,636.00 3,807.20
Monthly 6,801.60 7,141.33 7,500.13 7,878.00 8,248.93
Annual 81,619.20 85,696.00 90,001.60 94,536.00 98,987.20 Hourly 44.82 46.85 49.00 51.19 53.62
Bi-Weekly 3,585.60 3,748.00 3,920.00 4,095.20 4,289.60
Monthly 7,768.80 8,120.67 8,493.33 8,872.93 9,294.13
Annual 93,225.60 97,448.00 101,920.00 106,475.20 111,529.60 Hourly 40.75 42.59 44.54 46.54 48.74
Bi-Weekly 3,260.00 3,407.20 3,563.20 3,723.20 3,899.20
Monthly 7,063.33 7,382.27 7,720.27 8,066.93 8,448.27
Annual 84,760.00 88,587.20 92,643.20 96,803.20 101,379.20 Hourly 35.79 37.35 39.15 40.94 42.88
Bi-Weekly 2,863.20 2,988.00 3,132.00 3,275.20 3,430.40
Monthly 6,203.60 6,474.00 6,786.00 7,096.27 7,432.53
Annual 74,443.20 77,688.00 81,432.00 85,155.20 89,190.40 Classified
Classified
Classified
H450
H460
H400 Classified
H405 Classified
PROPERTY & EVIDENCE TECHNICIAN C665 Classified
CRIME SCENE TECHNICIAN C685 Classified
PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE SUPERVISOR C676 Classified
POLICE ID SPECIALIST T555 Classified
Classified
FAMILY COUNSELOR T550 Classified
CERTIFIED LATENT PRINT EXAMINER T560 Classified
CRIME SCENE SPECIALIST C687 Classified

PERSONNEL OPERATIONS SPECIALIST

SENIOR CRIME AND INTELLIGENCE ANALYST

CRIME AND INTELLIGENCE ANALYST

POLICE PROGRAMS ANALYST
CRIME PREVENTION SPECIALIST II C671
H406

PERSONNEL AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATOR
MOBILE MENTAL HEALTH CLINICIAN T570 Classified
POLICE MENTAL HEALTH PROFESSIONAL H443 Classified
YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR H445 Classified COUNSELING SUPERVISOR H440 Classified
Classified
CRIME PREVENTION SPECIALIST I C670 Classified
RESERVE OFFICER COORDINATOR H455 Classified
OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES MANAGER U400
Salaries Effective March 25, 2024 13

SALARY PLAN FOR ALL CLASSIFICATIONS
(PER MUNI CODE SEC.2-4.30)
FY 2024

ATTACHMENT III
Recommended by
Personnel Commission
on March 14, 2024
Approved by Council
on March 26, 2024
Classification Title Job Code Service Type Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Hourly 61.29 64.33 67.54 70.93 74.48
Bi-Weekly 4,903.20 5,146.40 5,403.20 5,674.40 5,958.40
Monthly 10,623.60 11,150.53 11,706.93 12,294.53 12,909.87 Annual 127,483.20 133,806.40 140,483.20 147,534.40 154,918.40 Hourly 39.44 41.19 43.11 45.09 47.23
Bi-Weekly 3,155.20 3,295.20 3,448.80 3,607.20 3,778.40
Monthly 6,836.27 7,139.60 7,472.40 7,815.60 8,186.53
Annual 82,035.20 85,675.20 89,668.80 93,787.20 98,238.40 Hourly 33.90 35.65 37.26 39.02 40.87
Bi-Weekly 2,712.00 2,852.00 2,980.80 3,121.60 3,269.60
Monthly 5,876.00 6,179.33 6,458.40 6,763.47 7,084.13
Annual 70,512.00 74,152.00 77,500.80 81,161.60 85,009.60 Hourly 28.20 29.41 30.58 31.92 33.51
Bi-Weekly 2,256.00 2,352.80 2,446.40 2,553.60 2,680.80
Monthly 4,888.00 5,097.73 5,300.53 5,532.80 5,808.40
Annual 58,656.00 61,172.80 63,606.40 66,393.60 69,700.80 Hourly 29.80 31.07 32.31 33.73 35.41
Bi-Weekly 2,384.00 2,485.60 2,584.80 2,698.40 2,832.80
Monthly 5,165.33 5,385.47 5,600.40 5,846.53 6,137.73
Annual 61,984.00 64,625.60 67,204.80 70,158.40 73,652.80 Hourly 61.29 64.33 67.54 70.93 74.48
Bi-Weekly 4,903.20 5,146.40 5,403.20 5,674.40 5,958.40
Monthly 10,623.60 11,150.53 11,706.93 12,294.53 12,909.87 Annual 127,483.20 133,806.40 140,483.20 147,534.40 154,918.40 Hourly 48.84 51.28 53.85 56.54 59.40
Bi-Weekly 3,907.20 4,102.40 4,308.00 4,523.20 4,752.00
Monthly 8,465.60 8,888.53 9,334.00 9,800.27 10,296.00
Annual 101,587.20 106,662.40 112,008.00 117,603.20 123,552.00 Hourly 42.38 44.54 46.71 49.11 51.58
Bi-Weekly 3,390.40 3,563.20 3,736.80 3,928.80 4,126.40
Monthly 7,345.87 7,720.27 8,096.40 8,512.40 8,940.53
Annual 88,150.40 92,643.20 97,156.80 102,148.80 107,286.40 Hourly 35.27 36.99 38.86 40.80 42.85
Bi-Weekly 2,821.60 2,959.20 3,108.80 3,264.00 3,428.00
Monthly 6,113.47 6,411.60 6,735.73 7,072.00 7,427.33
Annual 73,361.60 76,939.20 80,828.80 84,864.00 89,128.00 Hourly 67.42 70.76 74.29 78.02 81.93
Bi-Weekly 5,393.60 5,660.80 5,943.20 6,241.60 6,554.40
Monthly 11,686.13 12,265.07 12,876.93 13,523.47 14,201.20 Annual 140,233.60 147,180.80 154,523.20 162,281.60 170,414.40 Hourly 42.39 44.51 46.73 49.07 51.52
Bi-Weekly 3,391.20 3,560.80 3,738.40 3,925.60 4,121.60
Monthly 7,347.60 7,715.07 8,099.87 8,505.47 8,930.13
Annual 88,171.20 92,580.80 97,198.40 102,065.60 107,161.60 Hourly 32.96 34.27 35.65 37.20 39.03
Bi-Weekly 2,636.80 2,741.60 2,852.00 2,976.00 3,122.40
Monthly 5,713.07 5,940.13 6,179.33 6,448.00 6,765.20
Annual 68,556.80 71,281.60 74,152.00 77,376.00 81,182.40 Hourly 28.97 30.48 32.10 33.67 35.49
Bi-Weekly 2,317.60 2,438.40 2,568.00 2,693.60 2,839.20
Monthly 5,021.47 5,283.20 5,564.00 5,836.13 6,151.60
Annual 60,257.60 63,398.40 66,768.00 70,033.60 73,819.20 Hourly 61.29 64.33 67.54 70.93 74.48
Bi-Weekly 4,903.20 5,146.40 5,403.20 5,674.40 5,958.40
Monthly 10,623.60 11,150.53 11,706.93 12,294.53 12,909.87 Annual 127,483.20 133,806.40 140,483.20 147,534.40 154,918.40 Hourly 44.86 46.74 48.99 51.27 53.73
Bi-Weekly 3,588.80 3,739.20 3,919.20 4,101.60 4,298.40
Monthly 7,775.73 8,101.60 8,491.60 8,886.80 9,313.20
Annual 93,308.80 97,219.20 101,899.20 106,641.60 111,758.40 Hourly 39.19 40.89 42.85 44.82 46.96
Bi-Weekly 3,135.20 3,271.20 3,428.00 3,585.60 3,756.80
Monthly 6,792.93 7,087.60 7,427.33 7,768.80 8,139.73
Annual 81,515.20 85,051.20 89,128.00 93,225.60 97,676.80 COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER C650 Classified
JAIL ADMINISTRATOR H420 Classified
JAIL SUPERVISOR C660 Classified
POLICE RECORDS CLERK II C695 Classified
POLICE RECORDS CLERK I C690 Classified
RECORDS SUPERVISOR C705 Classified
COMMUNICATIONS OPERATOR C635 Classified
CALL TAKER C633 Classified
PROPERTY, EVIDENCE AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATOR H465 Classified COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATOR H435 Classified
COMMUNICATIONS SUPERVISOR C645 Classified
ANIMAL CARE ATTENDANT C600 Classified
SHELTER VOLUNTEER COORDINATOR C607 Classified
SHELTER OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR C621 Classified
ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER C610 Classified
ANIMAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR H430 Classified
Salaries Effective March 25, 2024 14

SALARY PLAN FOR ALL CLASSIFICATIONS
(PER MUNI CODE SEC.2-4.30)
FY 2024

ATTACHMENT III
Recommended by
Personnel Commission
on March 14, 2024
Approved by Council
on March 26, 2024
Classification Title Job Code Service Type Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E

PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES DEPARTMENT

ADMINISTRATION
Hourly 92.94 97.60 102.47 107.59 112.98
Bi-Weekly 7,435.20 7,808.00 8,197.60 8,607.20 9,038.40
Monthly 16,109.60 16,917.33 17,761.47 18,648.93 19,583.20 Annual 193,315.20 203,008.00 213,137.60 223,787.20 234,998.40 Hourly 84.49 88.71 93.17 97.82 102.72
Bi-Weekly 6,759.20 7,096.80 7,453.60 7,825.60 8,217.60
Monthly 14,644.93 15,376.40 16,149.47 16,955.47 17,804.80 Annual 175,739.20 184,516.80 193,793.60 203,465.60 213,657.60 Hourly 82.01 86.11 90.44 94.96 99.70
Bi-Weekly 6,560.80 6,888.80 7,235.20 7,596.80 7,976.00
Monthly 14,215.07 14,925.73 15,676.27 16,459.73 17,281.33 Annual 170,580.80 179,108.80 188,115.20 197,516.80 207,376.00 Hourly 51.74 54.33 57.04 59.90 62.89
Bi-Weekly 4,139.20 4,346.40 4,563.20 4,792.00 5,031.20
Monthly 8,968.27 9,417.20 9,886.93 10,382.67 10,900.93
Annual 107,619.20 113,006.40 118,643.20 124,592.00 130,811.20 Hourly 84.46 88.69 93.15 97.81 102.69
Bi-Weekly 6,756.80 7,095.20 7,452.00 7,824.80 8,215.20
Monthly 14,639.73 15,372.93 16,146.00 16,953.73 17,799.60 Annual 175,676.80 184,475.20 193,752.00 203,444.80 213,595.20 Hourly 47.19 49.5 51.88 54.55 57.21
Bi-Weekly 3,775.20 3,960.00 4,150.40 4,364.00 4,576.80
Monthly 8,179.60 8,580.00 8,992.53 9,455.33 9,916.40
Annual 98,155.20 102,960.00 107,910.40 113,464.00 118,996.80 Hourly 34.83 36.28 37.62 39.05 40.54
Bi-Weekly 2,786.40 2,902.40 3,009.60 3,124.00 3,243.20
Monthly 6,037.20 6,288.53 6,520.80 6,768.67 7,026.93
Annual 72,446.40 75,462.40 78,249.60 81,224.00 84,323.20

AIRPORT DIVISION SUMMARY
Hourly 75.90 79.66 83.64 87.82 92.22
Bi-Weekly 6,072.00 6,372.80 6,691.20 7,025.60 7,377.60
Monthly 13,156.00 13,807.73 14,497.60 15,222.13 15,984.80 Annual 157,872.00 165,692.80 173,971.20 182,665.60 191,817.60 Hourly 63.26 66.39 69.72 73.22 76.87
Bi-Weekly 5,060.80 5,311.20 5,577.60 5,857.60 6,149.60
Monthly 10,965.07 11,507.60 12,084.80 12,691.47 13,324.13 Annual 131,580.80 138,091.20 145,017.60 152,297.60 159,889.60 Hourly 60.12 63.09 66.26 69.56 73.04
Bi-Weekly 4,809.60 5,047.20 5,300.80 5,564.80 5,843.20
Monthly 10,420.80 10,935.60 11,485.07 12,057.07 12,660.27 Annual 125,049.60 131,227.20 137,820.80 144,684.80 151,923.20 Hourly 37.32 39.22 41.15 43.11 45.33
Bi-Weekly 2,985.60 3,137.60 3,292.00 3,448.80 3,626.40
Monthly 6,468.80 6,798.13 7,132.67 7,472.40 7,857.20
Annual 77,625.60 81,577.60 85,592.00 89,668.80 94,286.40 Hourly 45.68 47.36 49.25 51.26 53.32
Bi-Weekly 3,654.40 3,788.80 3,940.00 4,100.80 4,265.60
Monthly 7,917.87 8,209.07 8,536.67 8,885.07 9,242.13
Annual 95,014.40 98,508.80 102,440.00 106,620.80 110,905.60 Hourly 41.65 43.32 45.06 46.66 48.46
Bi-Weekly 3,332.00 3,465.60 3,604.80 3,732.80 3,876.80
Monthly 7,219.33 7,508.80 7,810.40 8,087.73 8,399.73
Annual 86,632.00 90,105.60 93,724.80 97,052.80 100,796.80 Hourly 32.78 34.09 35.46 36.73 38.14
Bi-Weekly 2,622.40 2,727.20 2,836.80 2,938.40 3,051.20
Monthly 5,681.87 5,908.93 6,146.40 6,366.53 6,610.93
Annual 68,182.40 70,907.20 73,756.80 76,398.40 79,331.20

ENGINEERING/TRANSPORTATION DIVISION
Hourly 53.01 55.68 58.45 61.39 64.45
Bi-Weekly 4,240.80 4,454.40 4,676.00 4,911.20 5,156.00
Monthly 9,188.40 9,651.20 10,131.33 10,640.93 11,171.33 Annual 110,260.80 115,814.40 121,576.00 127,691.20 134,056.00 Hourly 47.06 49.54 52.01 54.54 57.24
Bi-Weekly 3,764.80 3,963.20 4,160.80 4,363.20 4,579.20
Monthly 8,157.07 8,586.93 9,015.07 9,453.60 9,921.60
Annual 97,884.80 103,043.20 108,180.80 113,443.20 119,059.20 Hourly 40.12 42.13 44.12 46.34 48.66
Bi-Weekly 3,209.60 3,370.40 3,529.60 3,707.20 3,892.80
Monthly 6,954.13 7,302.53 7,647.47 8,032.27 8,434.40
Annual 83,449.60 87,630.40 91,769.60 96,387.20 101,212.80 Hourly 71.81 75.39 79.19 83.13 87.28
Bi-Weekly 5,744.80 6,031.20 6,335.20 6,650.40 6,982.40
Monthly 12,447.07 13,067.60 13,726.27 14,409.20 15,128.53 Annual 149,364.80 156,811.20 164,715.20 172,910.40 181,542.40 Hourly 61.62 64.74 67.88 71.33 74.80
Bi-Weekly 4,929.60 5,179.20 5,430.40 5,706.40 5,984.00
Monthly 10,680.80 11,221.60 11,765.87 12,363.87 12,965.33 Annual 128,169.60 134,659.20 141,190.40 148,366.40 155,584.00 Hourly 53.08 55.84 58.70 61.51 64.61
Bi-Weekly 4,246.40 4,467.20 4,696.00 4,920.80 5,168.80
Monthly 9,200.53 9,678.93 10,174.67 10,661.73 11,199.07 Annual 110,406.40 116,147.20 122,096.00 127,940.80 134,388.80 WATER RESOURCES PLANNER T870 Classified
ASSOCIATE CIVIL ENGINEER T215 Classified
ASSISTANT CIVIL ENGINEER T210 Classified
REAL PROPERTY ASSISTANT T255 Classified
SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER H240 Classified
REAL PROPERTY MANAGER H225 Classified
REAL PROPERTY ASSOCIATE T260 Classified
AIRPORT MAINTENANCE WORKER M505 Classified
AIRPORT ATTENDANT M500 Classified
AIRPORT OPERATIONS SPECIALIST T270 Classified
SENIOR AIRPORT MAINTENANCE WORKER M510 Classified
AIRPORT OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR H200 Classified
AIRPORT BUSINESS SUPERVISOR H198 Classified
STOREKEEPER - EXPEDITER M100 Classified
AIRPORT MANAGER H205 Classified
UTILITIES ENGINEERING MANAGER H880 Classified
SENIOR UTILITY SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE M820 Classified
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS U510 Classified
WATER RESOURCES MANAGER H875 Classified
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS-UTILITIES U525 Classified Salaries Effective March 25, 2024 15

SALARY PLAN FOR ALL CLASSIFICATIONS
(PER MUNI CODE SEC.2-4.30)
FY 2024

ATTACHMENT III
Recommended by
Personnel Commission
on March 14, 2024
Approved by Council
on March 26, 2024
Classification Title Job Code Service Type Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Hourly 40.16 42.12 44.25 46.44 48.67
Bi-Weekly 3,212.80 3,369.60 3,540.00 3,715.20 3,893.60
Monthly 6,961.07 7,300.80 7,670.00 8,049.60 8,436.13
Annual 83,532.80 87,609.60 92,040.00 96,595.20 101,233.60 Hourly 63.90 67.12 70.49 73.99 77.67
Bi-Weekly 5,112.00 5,369.60 5,639.20 5,919.20 6,213.60
Monthly 11,076.00 11,634.13 12,218.27 12,824.93 13,462.80 Annual 132,912.00 139,609.60 146,619.20 153,899.20 161,553.60 Hourly 50.18 52.66 55.26 58.01 60.93
Bi-Weekly 4,014.40 4,212.80 4,420.80 4,640.80 4,874.40
Monthly 8,697.87 9,127.73 9,578.40 10,055.07 10,561.20
Annual 104,374.40 109,532.80 114,940.80 120,660.80 126,734.40 Hourly 76.68 80.52 84.55 88.77 93.20
Bi-Weekly 6,134.40 6,441.60 6,764.00 7,101.60 7,456.00
Monthly 13,291.20 13,956.80 14,655.33 15,386.80 16,154.67 Annual 159,494.40 167,481.60 175,864.00 184,641.60 193,856.00 Hourly 69.71 73.20 76.86 80.70 84.72
Bi-Weekly 5,576.80 5,856.00 6,148.80 6,456.00 6,777.60
Monthly 12,083.07 12,688.00 13,322.40 13,988.00 14,684.80 Annual 144,996.80 152,256.00 159,868.80 167,856.00 176,217.60 Hourly 61.62 64.74 67.88 71.33 74.80
Bi-Weekly 4,929.60 5,179.20 5,430.40 5,706.40 5,984.00
Monthly 10,680.80 11,221.60 11,765.87 12,363.87 12,965.33 Annual 128,169.60 134,659.20 141,190.40 148,366.40 155,584.00 Hourly 53.08 55.84 58.70 61.51 64.61
Bi-Weekly 4,246.40 4,467.20 4,696.00 4,920.80 5,168.80
Monthly 9,200.53 9,678.93 10,174.67 10,661.73 11,199.07 Annual 110,406.40 116,147.20 122,096.00 127,940.80 134,388.80 Hourly 59.99 62.97 66.12 69.43 72.89
Bi-Weekly 4,799.20 5,037.60 5,289.60 5,554.40 5,831.20
Monthly 10,398.27 10,914.80 11,460.80 12,034.53 12,634.27 Annual 124,779.20 130,977.60 137,529.60 144,414.40 151,611.20 Hourly 51.99 54.54 57.26 60.20 63.08
Bi-Weekly 4,159.20 4,363.20 4,580.80 4,816.00 5,046.40
Monthly 9,011.60 9,453.60 9,925.07 10,434.67 10,933.87
Annual 108,139.20 113,443.20 119,100.80 125,216.00 131,206.40 Hourly 42.18 44.22 46.46 48.76 51.09
Bi-Weekly 3,374.40 3,537.60 3,716.80 3,900.80 4,087.20
Monthly 7,311.20 7,664.80 8,053.07 8,451.73 8,855.60
Annual 87,734.40 91,977.60 96,636.80 101,420.80 106,267.20 Hourly 64.13 67.34 70.71 74.25 77.96
Bi-Weekly 5,130.40 5,387.20 5,656.80 5,940.00 6,236.80
Monthly 11,115.87 11,672.27 12,256.40 12,870.00 13,513.07 Annual 133,390.40 140,067.20 147,076.80 154,440.00 162,156.80 Hourly 56.46 59.47 62.48 65.42 68.68
Bi-Weekly 4,516.80 4,757.60 4,998.40 5,233.60 5,494.40
Monthly 9,786.40 10,308.13 10,829.87 11,339.47 11,904.53 Annual 117,436.80 123,697.60 129,958.40 136,073.60 142,854.40 Hourly 47.30 49.73 52.05 54.69 57.47
Bi-Weekly 3,784.00 3,978.40 4,164.00 4,375.20 4,597.60
Monthly 8,198.67 8,619.87 9,022.00 9,479.60 9,961.47
Annual 98,384.00 103,438.40 108,264.00 113,755.20 119,537.60 PRINCIPAL TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER H217 Classified
SENIOR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR T250 Classified
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR T245 Classified
TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIAN T220 Classified
SUPERVISING CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR H235 Classified
SENIOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNER H210 Classified
ASSOCIATE TRANSPORTATION PLANNER T225 Classified
ASSOCIATE TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER T240 Classified
ASSISTANT TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER T235 Classified
SURVEYOR T265 Classified
SENIOR TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER H215 Classified
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN T200 Classified
SURVEY ENGINEER H230 Classified
Salaries Effective March 25, 2024 16

SALARY PLAN FOR ALL CLASSIFICATIONS
(PER MUNI CODE SEC.2-4.30)
FY 2024

ATTACHMENT III
Recommended by
Personnel Commission
on March 14, 2024
Approved by Council
on March 26, 2024
Classification Title Job Code Service Type Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E

RECYCLING-SOLID WASTE
Hourly 60.12 63.09 66.26 69.56 73.04
Bi-Weekly 4,809.60 5,047.20 5,300.80 5,564.80 5,843.20
Monthly 10,420.80 10,935.60 11,485.07 12,057.07 12,660.27 Annual 125,049.60 131,227.20 137,820.80 144,684.80 151,923.20 Hourly 40.47 42.48 44.54 46.81 49.14
Bi-Weekly 3,237.60 3,398.40 3,563.20 3,744.80 3,931.20
Monthly 7,014.80 7,363.20 7,720.27 8,113.73 8,517.60
Annual 84,177.60 88,358.40 92,643.20 97,364.80 102,211.20 Hourly 50.98 53.51 56.20 59.00 61.95
Bi-Weekly 4,078.40 4,280.80 4,496.00 4,720.00 4,956.00
Monthly 8,836.53 9,275.07 9,741.33 10,226.67 10,738.00
Annual 106,038.40 111,300.80 116,896.00 122,720.00 128,856.00 Hourly 46.35 48.65 51.08 53.63 56.32
Bi-Weekly 3,708.00 3,892.00 4,086.40 4,290.40 4,505.60
Monthly 8,034.00 8,432.67 8,853.87 9,295.87 9,762.13
Annual 96,408.00 101,192.00 106,246.40 111,550.40 117,145.60 Hourly 42.14 44.23 46.43 48.74 51.19
Bi-Weekly 3,371.20 3,538.40 3,714.40 3,899.20 4,095.20
Monthly 7,304.27 7,666.53 8,047.87 8,448.27 8,872.93
Annual 87,651.20 91,998.40 96,574.40 101,379.20 106,475.20

WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITY (WPCF)
Hourly 82.01 86.11 90.44 94.96 99.70
Bi-Weekly 6,560.80 6,888.80 7,235.20 7,596.80 7,976.00
Monthly 14,215.07 14,925.73 15,676.27 16,459.73 17,281.33 Annual 170,580.80 179,108.80 188,115.20 197,516.80 207,376.00 Hourly 68.90 72.35 75.98 79.78 83.77
Bi-Weekly 5,512.00 5,788.00 6,078.40 6,382.40 6,701.60
Monthly 11,942.67 12,540.67 13,169.87 13,828.53 14,520.13 Annual 143,312.00 150,488.00 158,038.40 165,942.40 174,241.60 Hourly 70.22 73.71 77.42 81.28 85.35
Bi-Weekly 5,617.60 5,896.80 6,193.60 6,502.40 6,828.00
Monthly 12,171.47 12,776.40 13,419.47 14,088.53 14,794.00 Annual 146,057.60 153,316.80 161,033.60 169,062.40 177,528.00 Hourly 70.22 73.71 77.42 81.28 85.35
Bi-Weekly 5,617.60 5,896.80 6,193.60 6,502.40 6,828.00
Monthly 12,171.47 12,776.40 13,419.47 14,088.53 14,794.00 Annual 146,057.60 153,316.80 161,033.60 169,062.40 177,528.00 Hourly 56.08 58.31 60.64 63.01 65.57
Bi-Weekly 4,486.40 4,664.80 4,851.20 5,040.80 5,245.60
Monthly 9,720.53 10,107.07 10,510.93 10,921.73 11,365.47 Annual 116,646.40 121,284.80 126,131.20 131,060.80 136,385.60 Hourly 50.97 53.00 55.11 57.28 59.60
Bi-Weekly 4,077.60 4,240.00 4,408.80 4,582.40 4,768.00
Monthly 8,834.80 9,186.67 9,552.40 9,928.53 10,330.67
Annual 106,017.60 110,240.00 114,628.80 119,142.40 123,968.00 Hourly 44.54 46.28 48.22 49.88 51.83
Bi-Weekly 3,563.20 3,702.40 3,857.60 3,990.40 4,146.40
Monthly 7,720.27 8,021.87 8,358.13 8,645.87 8,983.87
Annual 92,643.20 96,262.40 100,297.60 103,750.40 107,806.40 OPERATOR-IN-TRAINING M925 Classified
WPCF LEAD OPERATOR M935 Classified
WPCF OPERATOR M930 Classified
WPCF MAINTENANCE MANAGER H860 Classified
WPCF OPERATIONS MANAGER H855 Classified
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITY MANAGER H870 Classified WPCF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANAGER H865 Classified SUSTAINABILITY SPECIALIST T803 Classified
SUSTAINABILITY TECHNICIAN T802 Classified
SOLID WASTE PROGRAM MANAGER H800 Classified
RECYCLING SPECIALIST T800 Classified
SENIOR SUSTAINABILITY SPECIALIST T804 Classified
Salaries Effective March 25, 2024 17

SALARY PLAN FOR ALL CLASSIFICATIONS
(PER MUNI CODE SEC.2-4.30)
FY 2024

WATER POLLUTION SOURCE CONTROL
Hourly 70.75 74.28 78.02 81.91 86.01
Bi-Weekly 5,660.00 5,942.40 6,241.60 6,552.80 6,880.80
Monthly 12,263.33 12,875.20 13,523.47 14,197.73 14,908.40 Annual 147,160.00 154,502.40 162,281.60 170,372.80 178,900.80 Hourly 61.49 64.59 67.79 71.21 74.77
Bi-Weekly 4,919.20 5,167.20 5,423.20 5,696.80 5,981.60
Monthly 10,658.27 11,195.60 11,750.27 12,343.07 12,960.13 Annual 127,899.20 134,347.20 141,003.20 148,116.80 155,521.60 Hourly 51.88 54.57 57.31 60.03 63.11
Bi-Weekly 4,150.40 4,365.60 4,584.80 4,802.40 5,048.80
Monthly 8,992.53 9,458.80 9,933.73 10,405.20 10,939.07
Annual 107,910.40 113,505.60 119,204.80 124,862.40 131,268.80 Hourly 47.15 49.61 51.87 54.54 57.26
Bi-Weekly 3,772.00 3,968.80 4,149.60 4,363.20 4,580.80
Monthly 8,172.67 8,599.07 8,990.80 9,453.60 9,925.07
Annual 98,072.00 103,188.80 107,889.60 113,443.20 119,100.80 Hourly 42.43 44.65 46.68 49.09 51.52
Bi-Weekly 3,394.40 3,572.00 3,734.40 3,927.20 4,121.60
Monthly 7,354.53 7,739.33 8,091.20 8,508.93 8,930.13
Annual 88,254.40 92,872.00 97,094.40 102,107.20 107,161.60 Hourly 18.21
Bi-Weekly 1,456.80
Monthly 3,156.40
Annual 37,876.80
Hourly 70.40 73.92 77.62 81.50 85.55
Bi-Weekly 5,632.00 5,913.60 6,209.60 6,520.00 6,844.00
Monthly 12,202.67 12,812.80 13,454.13 14,126.67 14,828.67 Annual 146,432.00 153,753.60 161,449.60 169,520.00 177,944.00 Hourly 80.53 84.55 88.79 93.21 97.88
Bi-Weekly 6,442.40 6,764.00 7,103.20 7,456.80 7,830.40
Monthly 13,958.53 14,655.33 15,390.27 16,156.40 16,965.87 Annual 167,502.40 175,864.00 184,683.20 193,876.80 203,590.40 Hourly 73.21 76.86 80.72 84.74 88.98
Bi-Weekly 5,856.80 6,148.80 6,457.60 6,779.20 7,118.40
Monthly 12,689.73 13,322.40 13,991.47 14,688.27 15,423.20 Annual 152,276.80 159,868.80 167,897.60 176,259.20 185,078.40

SEWER COLLECTIONS & WATER DISTRIBUTION
Hourly 77.26 81.09 85.14 89.4 93.88
Bi-Weekly 6,180.80 6,487.20 6,811.20 7,152.00 7,510.40
Monthly 13,391.73 14,055.60 14,757.60 15,496.00 16,272.53 Annual 160,700.80 168,667.20 177,091.20 185,952.00 195,270.40 Hourly 70.22 73.71 77.42 81.28 85.35
Bi-Weekly 5,617.60 5,896.80 6,193.60 6,502.40 6,828.00
Monthly 12,171.47 12,776.40 13,419.47 14,088.53 14,794.00 Annual 146,057.60 153,316.80 161,033.60 169,062.40 177,528.00 Hourly 70.22 73.71 77.42 81.28 85.35
Bi-Weekly 5,617.60 5,896.80 6,193.60 6,502.40 6,828.00
Monthly 12,171.47 12,776.40 13,419.47 14,088.53 14,794.00 Annual 146,057.60 153,316.80 161,033.60 169,062.40 177,528.00 Hourly 67.49 70.84 74.39 78.12 82.03
Bi-Weekly 5,399.20 5,667.20 5,951.20 6,249.60 6,562.40
Monthly 11,698.27 12,278.93 12,894.27 13,540.80 14,218.53 Annual 140,379.20 147,347.20 154,731.20 162,489.60 170,622.40 PRINICIPAL UTILITIES ENGINEER H812 Classified
UTILITIES FIELD SERVICES MANAGER H825 Classified
WASTEWATER COLLECTIONS SYSTEM MANAGER H823 Classified
UTILITIES OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANAGER H835 Classified UTILITIES ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANAGER H830 Classified SENIOR WATER RESOURCES ENGINEER H813 Classified
SENIOR UTILITIES ENGINEER H810 Classified
WATER POLLUTION SOURCE CONTROL INSPECTOR I T809 Classified TECHNICAL INTERN Z125 Classified
SENIOR WATER POLLUTION SOURCE CONTROL INSPECTOR T815 Classified WATER POLLUTION SOURCE CONTROL INSPECTOR II T810 Classified ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES MANAGER H805 Classified
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATOR H845 Classified
CHEMIST T807 Classified
LABORATORY TECHNICIAN T805 Classified
LABORATORY MANAGER H850 Classified
Salaries Effective March 25, 2024 18

SALARY PLAN FOR ALL CLASSIFICATIONS
(PER MUNI CODE SEC.2-4.30)
FY 2024

ATTACHMENT III
Recommended by
Personnel Commission
on March 14, 2024
Approved by Council
on March 26, 2024
Classification Title Job Code Service Type Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Hourly 49.59 52.09 54.67 57.42 60.29
Bi-Weekly 3,967.20 4,167.20 4,373.60 4,593.60 4,823.20
Monthly 8,595.60 9,028.93 9,476.13 9,952.80 10,450.27
Annual 103,147.20 108,347.20 113,713.60 119,433.60 125,403.20 Hourly 51.00 53.03 55.19 57.15 59.37
Bi-Weekly 4,080.00 4,242.40 4,415.20 4,572.00 4,749.60
Monthly 8,840.00 9,191.87 9,566.27 9,906.00 10,290.80
Annual 106,080.00 110,302.40 114,795.20 118,872.00 123,489.60 Hourly 49.68 51.38 53.40 55.62 57.89
Bi-Weekly 3,974.40 4,110.40 4,272.00 4,449.60 4,631.20
Monthly 8,611.20 8,905.87 9,256.00 9,640.80 10,034.27
Annual 103,334.40 106,870.40 111,072.00 115,689.60 120,411.20 Hourly 43.18 44.68 46.44 48.38 50.33
Bi-Weekly 3,454.40 3,574.40 3,715.20 3,870.40 4,026.40
Monthly 7,484.53 7,744.53 8,049.60 8,385.87 8,723.87
Annual 89,814.40 92,934.40 96,595.20 100,630.40 104,686.40 Hourly 41.97 43.59 45.38 47.25 49.13
Bi-Weekly 3,357.60 3,487.20 3,630.40 3,780.00 3,930.40
Monthly 7,274.80 7,555.60 7,865.87 8,190.00 8,515.87
Annual 87,297.60 90,667.20 94,390.40 98,280.00 102,190.40 Hourly 37.51 39.01 40.58 42.07 43.75
Bi-Weekly 3,000.80 3,120.80 3,246.40 3,365.60 3,500.00
Monthly 6,501.73 6,761.73 7,033.87 7,292.13 7,583.33
Annual 78,020.80 81,140.80 84,406.40 87,505.60 91,000.00 Hourly 36.30 38.02 39.78 41.73 43.75
Bi-Weekly 2,904.00 3,041.60 3,182.40 3,338.40 3,500.00
Monthly 6,292.00 6,590.13 6,895.20 7,233.20 7,583.33
Annual 75,504.00 79,081.60 82,742.40 86,798.40 91,000.00 Hourly 57.03 59.86 62.86 66.02 69.32
Bi-Weekly 4,562.40 4,788.80 5,028.80 5,281.60 5,545.60
Monthly 9,885.20 10,375.73 10,895.73 11,443.47 12,015.47 Annual 118,622.40 124,508.80 130,748.80 137,321.60 144,185.60 Hourly 41.38 43.02 44.81 46.37 48.18
Bi-Weekly 3,310.40 3,441.60 3,584.80 3,709.60 3,854.40
Monthly 7,172.53 7,456.80 7,767.07 8,037.47 8,351.20
Annual 86,070.40 89,481.60 93,204.80 96,449.60 100,214.40

GENERAL MAINTENANCE
Hourly 42.02 43.68 45.52 47.08 48.92
Bi-Weekly 3,361.60 3,494.40 3,641.60 3,766.40 3,913.60
Monthly 7,283.47 7,571.20 7,890.13 8,160.53 8,479.47
Annual 87,401.60 90,854.40 94,681.60 97,926.40 101,753.60 Hourly 52.34 54.43 56.70 58.66 60.95
Bi-Weekly 4,187.20 4,354.40 4,536.00 4,692.80 4,876.00
Monthly 9,072.27 9,434.53 9,828.00 10,167.73 10,564.67
Annual 108,867.20 113,214.40 117,936.00 122,012.80 126,776.00 Hourly 45.53 47.32 49.30 51.04 52.99
Bi-Weekly 3,642.40 3,785.60 3,944.00 4,083.20 4,239.20
Monthly 7,891.87 8,202.13 8,545.33 8,846.93 9,184.93
Annual 94,702.40 98,425.60 102,544.00 106,163.20 110,219.20 Hourly 41.38 43.02 44.81 46.37 48.18
Bi-Weekly 3,310.40 3,441.60 3,584.80 3,709.60 3,854.40
Monthly 7,172.53 7,456.80 7,767.07 8,037.47 8,351.20
Annual 86,070.40 89,481.60 93,204.80 96,449.60 100,214.40 Hourly 51.00 53.03 55.19 57.15 59.37
Bi-Weekly 4,080.00 4,242.40 4,415.20 4,572.00 4,749.60
Monthly 8,840.00 9,191.87 9,566.27 9,906.00 10,290.80
Annual 106,080.00 110,302.40 114,795.20 118,872.00 123,489.60 Hourly 44.35 46.12 48.00 49.68 51.61
Bi-Weekly 3,548.00 3,689.60 3,840.00 3,974.40 4,128.80
Monthly 7,687.33 7,994.13 8,320.00 8,611.20 8,945.73
Annual 92,248.00 95,929.60 99,840.00 103,334.40 107,348.80 Hourly 40.31 41.93 43.65 45.16 46.92
Bi-Weekly 3,224.80 3,354.40 3,492.00 3,612.80 3,753.60
Monthly 6,987.07 7,267.87 7,566.00 7,827.73 8,132.80
Annual 83,844.80 87,214.40 90,792.00 93,932.80 97,593.60 Hourly 50.97 53.00 55.11 57.28 59.60
Bi-Weekly 4,077.60 4,240.00 4,408.80 4,582.40 4,768.00
Monthly 8,834.80 9,186.67 9,552.40 9,928.53 10,330.67
Annual 106,017.60 110,240.00 114,628.80 119,142.40 123,968.00 M920 Classified
UTILITIES MAINTENANCE MECHANIC M415 Classified
Classified
Classified
Classified

SENIOR UTILITY LEADER - SEWER

UTILITY LEADER - SEWER
UTILITY WORKER - SEWER M910 Classified
M915 Classified

SENIOR UTILITY LEADER

UTILITY LEADER - WATER
UTILITY WORKER - WATER M835
M840
M845
UTILITIES SERVICE WORKER M900 Classified
EQUIPMENT OPERATOR M400 Classified
BACKFLOW/CROSS CONNECTION TESTER M800 Classified
UTILITIES MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR H820 Classified
WATER METER MECHANIC M810 Classified
CUSTOMER FIELD TECHNICIAN M807 Classified
SENIOR UTILITY CUSTOMER SERVICE LEADER M825 Classified
CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL SPECIALIST M815 Classified
WATER INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR H815 Classified SENIOR UTILITY FIELD SERVICES LEADER M827 Classified
Salaries Effective March 25, 2024 19

SALARY PLAN FOR ALL CLASSIFICATIONS
(PER MUNI CODE SEC.2-4.30)
FY 2024

ATTACHMENT III
Recommended by
Personnel Commission
on March 14, 2024
Approved by Council
on March 26, 2024
Classification Title Job Code Service Type Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
Hourly 80.12 84.12 88.33 92.75 97.37
Bi-Weekly 6,409.60 6,729.60 7,066.40 7,420.00 7,789.60
Monthly 13,887.47 14,580.80 15,310.53 16,076.67 16,877.47 Annual 166,649.60 174,969.60 183,726.40 192,920.00 202,529.60 Hourly 64.69 67.91 71.31 74.89 78.62
Bi-Weekly 5,175.20 5,432.80 5,704.80 5,991.20 6,289.60
Monthly 11,212.93 11,771.07 12,360.40 12,980.93 13,627.47 Annual 134,555.20 141,252.80 148,324.80 155,771.20 163,529.60 Hourly 75.46 79.23 83.21 87.38 91.76
Bi-Weekly 6,036.80 6,338.40 6,656.80 6,990.40 7,340.80
Monthly 13,079.73 13,733.20 14,423.07 15,145.87 15,905.07 Annual 156,956.80 164,798.40 173,076.80 181,750.40 190,860.80 Hourly 58.19 61.11 64.18 67.38 70.74
Bi-Weekly 4,655.20 4,888.80 5,134.40 5,390.40 5,659.20
Monthly 10,086.27 10,592.40 11,124.53 11,679.20 12,261.60 Annual 121,035.20 127,108.80 133,494.40 140,150.40 147,139.20 Hourly 60.41 63.44 66.62 69.93 73.44
Bi-Weekly 4,832.80 5,075.20 5,329.60 5,594.40 5,875.20
Monthly 10,471.07 10,996.27 11,547.47 12,121.20 12,729.60 Annual 125,652.80 131,955.20 138,569.60 145,454.40 152,755.20 Hourly 62.51 65.63 68.74 72.21 77.00
Bi-Weekly 5,000.80 5,250.40 5,499.20 5,776.80 6,160.00
Monthly 10,835.07 11,375.87 11,914.93 12,516.40 13,346.67 Annual 130,020.80 136,510.40 142,979.20 150,196.80 160,160.00 Hourly 64.75 67.91 71.42 74.97 78.66
Bi-Weekly 5,180.00 5,432.80 5,713.60 5,997.60 6,292.80
Monthly 11,223.33 11,771.07 12,379.47 12,994.80 13,634.40 Annual 134,680.00 141,252.80 148,553.60 155,937.60 163,612.80 Hourly 58.86 61.74 64.93 68.15 71.51
Bi-Weekly 4,708.80 4,939.20 5,194.40 5,452.00 5,720.80
Monthly 10,202.40 10,701.60 11,254.53 11,812.67 12,395.07 Annual 122,428.80 128,419.20 135,054.40 141,752.00 148,740.80 Hourly 53.51 56.12 59.03 61.95 65.01
Bi-Weekly 4,280.80 4,489.60 4,722.40 4,956.00 5,200.80
Monthly 9,275.07 9,727.47 10,231.87 10,738.00 11,268.40 Annual 111,300.80 116,729.60 122,782.40 128,856.00 135,220.80 Hourly 48.63 51.07 53.62 56.28 59.10
Bi-Weekly 3,890.40 4,085.60 4,289.60 4,502.40 4,728.00
Monthly 8,429.20 8,852.13 9,294.13 9,755.20 10,244.00
Annual 101,150.40 106,225.60 111,529.60 117,062.40 122,928.00 Hourly 54.39 57.09 59.94 62.94 66.10
Bi-Weekly 4,351.20 4,567.20 4,795.20 5,035.20 5,288.00
Monthly 9,427.60 9,895.60 10,389.60 10,909.60 11,457.33 Annual 113,131.20 118,747.20 124,675.20 130,915.20 137,488.00 Hourly 49.42 51.90 54.51 57.25 60.07
Bi-Weekly 3,953.60 4,152.00 4,360.80 4,580.00 4,805.60
Monthly 8,566.13 8,996.00 9,448.40 9,923.33 10,412.13
Annual 102,793.60 107,952.00 113,380.80 119,080.00 124,945.60 Hourly 54.39 57.09 59.94 62.94 66.10
Bi-Weekly 4,351.20 4,567.20 4,795.20 5,035.20 5,288.00
Monthly 9,427.60 9,895.60 10,389.60 10,909.60 11,457.33 Annual 113,131.20 118,747.20 124,675.20 130,915.20 137,488.00 Hourly 49.42 51.90 54.51 57.25 60.07
Bi-Weekly 3,953.60 4,152.00 4,360.80 4,580.00 4,805.60
Monthly 8,566.13 8,996.00 9,448.40 9,923.33 10,412.13
Annual 102,793.60 107,952.00 113,380.80 119,080.00 124,945.60 Hourly 44.79 47.03 49.36 51.84 54.46
Bi-Weekly 3,583.20 3,762.40 3,948.80 4,147.20 4,356.80
Monthly 7,763.60 8,151.87 8,555.73 8,985.60 9,439.73
Annual 93,163.20 97,822.40 102,668.80 107,827.20 113,276.80 Hourly 40.74 42.76 44.91 47.16 49.52
Bi-Weekly 3,259.20 3,420.80 3,592.80 3,772.80 3,961.60
Monthly 7,061.60 7,411.73 7,784.40 8,174.40 8,583.47
Annual 84,739.20 88,940.80 93,412.80 98,092.80 103,001.60 Hourly 44.79 47.03 49.36 51.84 54.46
Bi-Weekly 3,583.20 3,762.40 3,948.80 4,147.20 4,356.80
Monthly 7,763.60 8,151.87 8,555.73 8,985.60 9,439.73
Annual 93,163.20 97,822.40 102,668.80 107,827.20 113,276.80 Hourly 40.74 42.76 44.91 47.16 49.52
Bi-Weekly 3,259.20 3,420.80 3,592.80 3,772.80 3,961.60
Monthly 7,061.60 7,411.73 7,784.40 8,174.40 8,583.47
Annual 84,739.20 88,940.80 93,412.80 98,092.80 103,001.60 Hourly 36.70 38.51 40.49 42.50 44.54
Bi-Weekly 2,936.00 3,080.80 3,239.20 3,400.00 3,563.20
Monthly 6,361.33 6,675.07 7,018.27 7,366.67 7,720.27
Annual 76,336.00 80,100.80 84,219.20 88,400.00 92,643.20 INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT TECHNICIAN T415 Classified
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TECHNICIAN II T425 Classified
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TECHNICIAN I T424 Classified
GEOGRAPHIC INFO SYSTEM TECHNICIAN II T465 Classified
GEOGRAPHIC INFO SYSTEM TECHNICIAN I T464 Classified
TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS ANALYST II T445 Classified
TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS ANALYST I T440 Classified

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ANALYST II

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ANALYST I
T435
T430
Classified
Classified
SYSTEMS ANALYST II T455 Classified
WEB SPECIALIST T450 Classified
SYSTEMS ANALYST I T454 Classified
NETWORK SYSTEMS SPECIALIST H555 Classified
GEOGRAPHIC INFO SYSTEMS COORDINATOR T460 Classified
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGER H566 Classified
DATA AND SYSTEMS COORDINATOR H560 Classified
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY U530 Classified INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGER H565 Classified
SENIOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS ANALYST T456 Classified Salaries Effective March 25, 2024 20

SALARY PLAN FOR ALL CLASSIFICATIONS
(PER MUNI CODE SEC.2-4.30)
FY 2024

ATTACHMENT III
Recommended by
Personnel Commission
on March 14, 2024
Approved by Council
on March 26, 2024
Classification Title Job Code Service Type Step A Step B Step C Step D Step E Hourly 33.45 34.94 36.70 38.44 40.24
Bi-Weekly 2,676.00 2,795.20 2,936.00 3,075.20 3,219.20
Monthly 5,798.00 6,056.27 6,361.33 6,662.93 6,974.93
Annual 69,576.00 72,675.20 76,336.00 79,955.20 83,699.20 Hourly 34.95 36.67 38.55 40.45 42.37
Bi-Weekly 2,796.00 2,933.60 3,084.00 3,236.00 3,389.60
Monthly 6,058.00 6,356.13 6,682.00 7,011.33 7,344.13
Annual 72,696.00 76,273.60 80,184.00 84,136.00 88,129.60 Hourly 19.19
Bi-Weekly 1,535.20
Monthly 3,326.27
Annual 39,915.20
Hourly 18.21 23.03
Bi-Weekly 1,456.80 1,842.40
Monthly 3,156.40 3,991.87
Annual 37,876.80 47,902.40
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INTERN Z121 Classified
AUDIO VIDEO SPECIALIST T410 Classified
VIDEO ASSISTANT T400 Classified
DATA SYSTEMS OPERATOR C450 Classified
Salaries Effective March 25, 2024 21
CITY OF HAYWARD Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
File #: CONS 24-159
DATE: March 26, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Finance

SUBJECT
Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement between the City of Hayward and Maze & Associates for Audit and Financial Services Not-to- Exceed $389,807

RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopts a resolution (Attachment II) authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract between the City and Maze & Associates for a professional services agreement for a three-year term, with an option to extend for two additional years (up to a total of five years).

SUMMARY
The City’s contract with Maze & Associates expires on June 30, 2024. The City issued a Request For Proposals (RFP) for audit services on July 21, 2023 for services to commence with fiscal year ending June 30, 2024 with an option of auditing its financial statements for each of the two subsequent fiscal years.

Five audit firms responded to the RFP including Maze & Associates, all five firms were invited to participate in oral interviews with staff. Maze & Associates was selected through the RFP process to serve as the City’s professional audit firm for the next three years, with an option to extend for an additional two years.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Resolution
CITY OF HAYWARD Page 1 of 1 Printed on 3/22/2024
powered by Legistar™
DATE: March 26, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Finance
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Professional Services Agreement between the City of Hayward and Maze & Associates for Audit and Financial Services Not to Exceed $389,807

SUMMARY
The City’s contract with Maze & Associates expires on June 30, 2024. The City issued a Request For Proposal (RFP) for audit services on July 21, 2023 for services to commence with fiscal year ending June 30, 2024 with an option of auditing its financial statements for each of the two subsequent fiscal years. Five audit firms responded to the RFP including Maze & Associates, all five firms were invited to participate in oral interviews with staff.

Maze & Associates was selected through the RFP process to serve as the City’s professional audit firm for the next three years, with an option to extend for an additional two years.

BACKGROUND
Maze & Associates has been the City’s auditors since fiscal year 2011. The City solicited requests for proposals on July 21, 2023. Following an extensive review process, staff recommends Maze & Associates to provide financial audit and reporting services beginning with the audit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024.

DISCUSSION
On July 21, 2023, an RFP was issued through the City’s procurement portal, this automatically notified over 3,400 firms and companies that the City was seeking finance and audit services.

Fourteen firms followed the RFP process and ultimately five firms responded and submitted proposals. The RFP requested detailed information about the firm, staffing, experience, location, and a proposed fee schedule. All five firms were selected to continue forward in the process and were invited to participate in an oral interview with staff. The top three firms

Page 2 of 2 ends

Hayward City CouncilMarch 26, 2024

Hayward City Council
March 26, 2024