CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
MAY 28, 2024
DOCUMENTS
RECEIVED AFTER
PUBLISHED AGENDA
Item #1
PH 24-022
Public Hearing No.2 to
Receive Input from the
Community on City
Council Districts to be
Established for District-
Based Elections
Beginning in 2026
FW: Hayward districts1 message
Districting <[email protected]> Wed, May 15, 2024 at 3:56 PM To: HaywardDistricting <[email protected]> CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
From: Rebecca Parr
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 3:56:28 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada) To: Districting <[email protected]>
Subject: Hayward districts
CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
Regarding Hayward's shift to district elections, I urge that the Jackson Triangle NOT be lumped with South Hayward, as city officials have done in the past.
The Jackson Triangle is more closely aligned with downtown Hayward than with South Hayward. For example, the Main Library is closer to Jackson Triangle residents than the Weekes branch library. Jackson Triangle residents use Hayward BART station, which is closer to Jackson Triangle than South Hayward BART. Jackson Triangle students attend Hayward High School, not Tennyson or Mt. Eden high schools. Etc., etc.
Sincerely,
Ms. Parr.
I rarely if ever frequent businesses in South Hayward
1 Lilia Corral
From: Peggy Guernsey
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2024 9:31 AM
To: Miriam Lens
Subject: Re: Special mtg 5/14
CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
No I was listening, waiting my turn, to about 5 people he called up, a couple were online, but oh well. no miss.
My neighborhood is quiet, only 2 shootings in 53 years!
I wanted to say it should be against the law that this att. can force me to not be able to vote for candidates that make decisions for the entire city. How can one person force the city to change and make money from it? Well I guess if 3 Councilmembers can suggest a 65.1% raise for themselves, without the public stopping it, then anything is possible.
My neighborhood is not friendly. We do not share picnics or BBQs. They shoot up fireworks and bullets. The Mayor and Councilmembers do not come to help translate for me when the neighbors break the law or harass the disabled. The Mayor says he and the other Councilmembers came to all the precincts but he nor they do not return to help.
The HPD wants my daughter to change her disability because the neighbor adults won't stop harassing her. She has tried to inform new neighbors that parking by fire hydrant is illegal. They don't care and move our garbage cans when she puts them out per her ability.
The neighbors block parking for my caregivers because the HPD REFUSES to paint a blue curb, "because they can't enforce it" per HPD. So my Paratransist buses, The Hayward HOP and medical transports and caregivers must park in the middle of the street to pick me up. This is unfair.
There is NO WAY this neighborhood will join together to vote for one person to represent us. I used to see a pretty good turnout because the local church volunteers their rooms and parking lot for easy and disabled access.
An Asian was elected by the Asian mobile home parks associations. Then she left. No one else has come forward as far as I know. I do not elect my representatives by race or heritage. I elect them for what they want to see Hayward become.
We have a terrible racist history and some continue it with bigotry and harassment.
The Hayward white community pushed the Blacks and Puerto Rican peoples beyond the railroad tracks. The returning Japanese were pushed beyond Tennyson. The Spanish and Portuguese peoples were called white. We still have rich and poor and non english speakers. At one time HUSD stated they 2 had 22 different home languages. They still have separate ethnic groups. The PTA attempted to print the school notices in several languages to help unite parents in the education of their children. HUSD said NO! So Hay is only an attempt at making South Hayward sound classy but it isn't. It is treated like not a part of Hayward. Downtown signage does nothing for the area. Separate elected officials only STOPS citizens from knowing everyone and puts us in areas in little boxes.
If we cannot elect candidates that we feel are caring and willing to change no matter where they live then we are not a city together, we are little areas. Boxed in by lines.
KEEP HAYWARD OPEN DO NOT DIVIDE US. CAN I SUE THIS ATTORNEY For MESSING WITH MY CITY? ANYONE WITH ME?
Peggy Guernsey
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 1:02 PM Miriam Lens wrote:
Good afternoon, Peggy:
I think the Mayor saw your hand after he had closed public comment. Would you like to send a message to Council and to [email protected] ? I will be happy to forward the message.
Thanks for joining the meeting.
Miriam
Miriam Lens
City Clerk
City of Hayward | 777 B Street | Hayward, CA 94541
Website: https://www.hayward-ca.gov/
FW: My SHP files for two alternatives: Hayward City Council1 message Districting <[email protected]>To: HaywardDistricting <[email protected]> CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
, 0 , 2 0 2 4 3 : 5 0 : 3 3 P M ( U TC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada)To: Districting <[email protected]>Subject: My SHP files for two alternatives: Hayward City Council CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
Hello Hayward Districting Consultant!
Attached is a zip file containing the Hayward block level GIS files (shx, shp, dbf, qix, prj.) These are my first two council boundary submissions. I created these in QGIS in early May, in anticipa I’ve checked out the redistricting map website. It looks a lot easier / cleaner than using QGIS!!! I’ve registered on there, a I’ve also attached maps of my first two alternatives. Maybe let’s name them “Atherton #1” and “Atherton #2” after my home street? Four variables are relevant in my GIS files:
“hayward” - - which refers to the 18 neighborhoods (16 created by the City Council, and adding in Eden Landing and Downtown Hayward as neighborhoods.) council1 = Alternative Atherton #1. This is a simple aggregation of the 18 Hayward neighborhoods, no adjustment.council2 = Alternative Atherton #2. This is my attempt at equalizing the six districts. GEOID = the detailed Census geographic ID, for linking to whatever master file you have. (state+county+tract+block).
The PL 94-171 data in my files are the original PL 94-171, not the adjusted populations. Thanks for providing the reference to these adjusted PL 94-171 files in your Excel workbook!! Somewhere in my process I lost two blocks: there should be 1,478 and I have only 1,476. But my population totals match the Census PL 94171 values, so my “missing blocks” are apparently Could you upload these two alternatives as my submission? I’d like to add some written discussions about the strengths and weaknesses of each.
I think adding the 18 Hayward neighborhoods as a display option in the online mapping tool might be beneficial.
Thanks for your presentation on May 14th, and I’m looking forward to more work on this.
Chuck Purvis
#########
FW: Map submission1 message
Districting <[email protected]> Tue, May 21, 2024 at 7:00 AM To: HaywardDistricting <[email protected]> CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
From: Dave Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 7:00:09 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada) To: Districting <[email protected]>
Subject: Map submission
CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
Dear City of Hayward staff and consultants:
I am submitting a set of proposed districts for the city council using the Excel spreadsheet method. My spreadsheet is attached. Most notably, it has 7 districts, despite the instructions to create 6 districts. The instructions imply that the city intends to retain a mayor elected at large. I see several problems with this.
First, from the two options described in Government Code 34886, the city council's resolution 24-011 chose "a district- based election system" and not elections "by district with an elective mayor".
Second, the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA) defines only the pure district system as a "safe harbor" remedy that limits legal fees and shields a city from future lawsuits. Elections Code 14026 categorizes an electoral method as "at large" and within the crosshairs of the CVRA if any member of a governing body is elected at large. Is the mayor part of the governing body? Yes, Hayward city charter V.500 and Government Code 34903 define the mayor as a city council member. The "safe harbor" procedures defined in Elections Code 10010 rely on the definition in 14026.
Third, having 7 districts instead of 6 can increase the likelihood that CVRA protected groups can elect a candidate of their choice. So a future CVRA lawsuit could be successful, causing the city to incur additional legal and consulting fees, and causing the current process to be a waste of time.
If you think any aspect of this argument is incorrect, please let me know. With a 7-district council, the mayor would be selected by the council from among its members, as many other California cities do.
To prepare this map, I followed all other instructions in Karin Mac Donald's presentation from the May 14 public hearing.
The proposed districts are about as equal in population as can be achieved using the 123 available segments while keeping them contiguous. I did not use the spreadsheet's race/ethnicity data in forming the districts, which is apparently the correct approach under the Federal Voting Rights Act as described on slide 8 of the presentation. I did not give special consideration to the interests of the plaintiff, which we are not instructed to do by either the presentation or the CVRA. The districts are compact, being free of tentacles other than those already created by the city's outer boundary.
Regarding the communities of interest criterion, I consider this a hopeless task. Overall, if electoral outcomes are highly sensitive to how lines are drawn, there is something wrong with our electoral method. Communities rarely arrange themselves into compact, contiguous, non-overlapping regions. The best way to accommodate all communities of interest is to adopt proportional ranked-choice voting (PRCV) as an alternative CVRA remedy. This method allows communities to group themselves, without the help or interference of drawers of district lines.
PRCV is much less complicated and subjective than district line drawing. Voters make a ranked list of candidates from anywhere in the city in order of preference. If a candidate wins more than a council seat's worth of votes, an appropriate fraction of those votes goes to the next choices on voters' lists. Last-place candidates are sequentially eliminated, with votes going to next choices.
If a community of interest is dispersed throughout the city, its voters can still elect the candidate of their choice. For a PRCV-elected council, nearly all voters win accountable and satisfactory representation. This is achievable because PRCV does not pit voters against each other within districts, unnecessarily creating winners and losers among voters.
PRCV does not allow the same group of voters to elect all of the candidates, as in the usual at-large method.
In our county, Albany has begun using proportional ranked-choice voting as a court-recognized CVRA remedy, and 3 other cities used ranked-choice voting within single-seat districts. After all maps are drawn, I expect that no map will be entirely satisfying to all, and the benefits of PRCV will be clearer to everyone.
Until then, we must go through the exercise of drawing maps. I have some questions about next steps:
1. Is it easy for you or me to import the Excel-drawn districts into the online mapping tool? This would allow easier visualization of maps, and allow us to make further edits using the smaller segments in that tool to obtain more equal populations.
2. Could the demographer prepare a map showing an overlay of all other district lines that bisect Hayward, such as assembly, supervisor, BART board, and park districts? This would provide valuable context for comparison to proposed district maps, and help us avoid creating tiny slices along crisscrossing district lines requiring the Registrar of Voters to print many new permutations of ballot cards.
The spreadsheet file that I downloaded on May 19 had errors in the SUMIF formulas in row 15, columns E through O of tab 2. To reduce file size, I deleted the map tabs in my submitted file, but they correspond to those in the file I downloaded on May 19.
Thank you for providing the mapping tools to the public, and for consideration of my map.
Dave Robinson
HCC_DistrictingProposal_Robinson_7Dist_240519.xlsx
43K
Hayward City Council Districting Tool
Population Dev % Total Latino % Latino NL Black % NL Black NL Asian % NL Asian NL HPI % NL HPI NL White
% NL
White
163,172 102,820 32,423 31.5% 12,608 12.3% 31,868 31.0% 2,365 2.3% 21,470 20.9% 70,055 38,788 14,015 36.1% 5,658 14.6% 9,755 25.1% 850 2.2% 7,742 20.0% 23,266 -0.19% 16,591 4,792 28.9% 1,504 9.1% 7,266 43.8% 251 1.5% 2,367 14.3% 22,862 -1.92% 13,661 5,142 37.6% 1,295 9.5% 4,310 31.5% 479 3.5% 2,164 15.8% 23,932 2.67% 16,803 4,809 28.6% 1,317 7.8% 6,653 39.6% 511 3.0% 3,212 19.1% 23,418 0.46% 12,715 4,332 34.1% 1,565 12.3% 3,788 29.8% 313 2.5% 2,514 19.8% 23,336 0.11% 12,058 5,216 43.3% 1,303 10.8% 2,917 24.2% 365 3.0% 1,909 15.8% 23,301 -0.04% 14,015 4,467 31.9% 2,790 19.9% 3,050 21.8% 172 1.2% 3,319 23.7% 23,057 -1.09% 16,977 3,665 21.6% 2,834 16.7% 3,884 22.9% 274 1.6% 5,985 35.3% 23,310.29
-1.9%
2.7%
4.59%
4 5
Ideal Pop:
Lowest District
Dev %:
Highest District
Dev %:
Total Plan
Range <~~~ A plan range up to 10% is considered legally allowable.
Segment List
(Only type District numbers 1-7 in the "Dist #" column; Do not type anywhere else; Do not sort columns) Unassigned
1 2
3 7
6 USD
Name: Dave Robinson
Org or Group: Hayward
Tell Us About
Your Plan:
7-district plan for a purely by-district council and not "one that combines at-large elections with district-based elections" and is subject to future CVRA claims (Elections Code 14026). More details are explained in a cover letter.
District Tabulator
( Do not type anywhere on this table; Do not sort columns) Population (2020
Census) Citizen Voting Age Population (DOJ Special Tab 2018-2022) District
Hayward City Council Districting Tool
Dist
# Segment Population Total Latino % Latino NL Black % NL Black NL Asian % NL Asian NL HPI % NL HPI NL
White
% NL
White
1 001 3,404 3,076 935 30.4% 200 6.5% 1,561 50.7% 60 2.0% 315 10.2% 1 002 1,758 1,176 275 23.4% 85 7.2% 621 52.8% 25 2.1% 170 14.5% 1 003 1,733 1,358 381 28.1% 136 10.0% 705 51.9% 55 4.1% 60 4.4% 1 004 1,752 1,499 736 49.1% 192 12.8% 510 34.0% - 0.0% 36 2.4% 1 005 1,542 691 180 26.0% 26 3.8% 264 38.2% 15 2.2% 185 26.8% 1 006 373 250 107 42.8% 7 2.8% 73 29.2% - 0.0% 56 22.4% 1 007 897 597 314 52.6% 39 6.5% 117 19.6% - 0.0% 129 21.6% 1 008 1,378 940 330 35.1% 25 2.7% 110 11.7% 55 5.9% 255 27.1% 1 009 1,821 1,220 485 39.8% 174 14.3% 301 24.7% - 0.0% 201 16.5% 1 010 854 975 380 39.0% 70 7.2% 415 42.6% 20 2.1% 90 9.2% 1 011 864 576 240 41.7% 26 4.5% 214 37.2% - 0.0% 94 16.3% 1 012 1,239 735 18 2.4% 93 12.7% 560 76.2% - 0.0% 37 5.0% 1 013 1,005 596 7 1.2% 48 8.1% 525 88.1% - 0.0% 33 5.5% 1 014 1,539 942 105 11.1% 96 10.2% 500 53.1% - 0.0% 140 14.9% 1 015 65 28 - 0.0% 12 42.9% 1 3.6% - 0.0% 7 25.0% 1 016 74 32 2 6.3% 37 115.6% - 0.0% - 0.0% 9 28.1% 1 017 504 221 2 0.9% 26 11.8% 44 19.9% - 0.0% 145 65.6% 2 018 2,304 1,129 467 41.4% 164 14.5% 266 23.6% 1 0.1% 216 19.1% 2 019 2,784 825 467 56.6% 11 1.3% 140 17.0% 80 9.7% 127 15.4% 2 020 1,129 676 175 25.9% 11 1.6% 325 48.1% - 0.0% 135 20.0% 2 021 922 450 130 28.9% 20 4.4% 70 15.6% 15 3.3% 210 46.7% 2 022 1,442 1,190 420 35.3% 130 10.9% 310 26.1% 20 1.7% 300 25.2% 2 023 366 206 106 51.5% 7 3.4% 62 30.1% - 0.0% 31 15.0% 2 024 1,118 631 185 29.3% 53 8.4% 233 36.9% 4 0.6% 149 23.6% 2 025 802 570 105 18.4% 25 4.4% 310 54.4% 15 2.6% 115 20.2% 2 026 916 767 270 35.2% 157 20.5% 210 27.4% 15 2.0% 110 14.3% 2 027 1,364 676 171 25.3% 74 10.9% 214 31.7% 38 5.6% 132 19.5% 2 028 1,083 791 254 32.1% 128 16.2% 231 29.2% 27 3.4% 108 13.7% 2 029 1,502 1,064 260 24.4% 133 12.5% 516 48.5% 11 1.0% 135 12.7% Population (2020
Census) Citizen Voting Age Population (DOJ Special Tab 2018-2022) Hayward City Council Districting Tool
2 030 1,231 935 268 28.7% 16 1.7% 595 63.6% 4 0.4% 56 6.0% 2 031 1,140 664 307 46.2% 98 14.8% 198 29.8% 33 5.0% 15 2.3% 1 032 1,556 1,127 226 20.1% 176 15.6% 539 47.8% 2 0.2% 198 17.6% 1 033 908 552 69 12.5% 36 6.5% 206 37.3% 19 3.4% 207 37.5% 2 034 3,232 1,974 966 48.9% 125 6.3% 457 23.2% 155 7.9% 226 11.4% 2 035 1,527 1,113 591 53.1% 143 12.8% 173 15.5% 61 5.5% 99 8.9% 3 036 1,726 1,260 109 8.7% 33 2.6% 675 53.6% - 0.0% 475 37.7% 3 037 175 126 16 12.7% 18 14.3% 10 7.9% - 0.0% 50 39.7% 3 038 1,142 859 273 31.8% 23 2.7% 236 27.5% 97 11.3% 281 32.7% 3 039 1,610 1,206 312 25.9% 62 5.1% 589 48.8% 63 5.2% 69 5.7% 3 040 1,275 905 297 32.8% 72 8.0% 252 27.8% 30 3.3% 112 12.4% 3 041 1,611 1,131 274 24.2% 73 6.5% 462 40.8% 87 7.7% 179 15.8% 3 042 1,459 1,010 239 23.7% 98 9.7% 467 46.2% 28 2.8% 170 16.8% 3 043 1,157 1,063 532 50.0% 45 4.2% 385 36.2% 25 2.4% 65 6.1% 3 044 1,871 1,010 195 19.3% 35 3.5% 365 36.1% 130 12.9% 280 27.7% 3 045 1,731 944 511 54.1% 92 9.7% 225 23.8% - 0.0% 120 12.7% 3 046 1,805 2,051 285 13.9% 185 9.0% 1,475 71.9% - 0.0% 96 4.7% 3 047 1,134 645 125 19.4% 10 1.6% 315 48.8% 4 0.6% 190 29.5% 3 048 1,015 567 236 41.6% 91 16.0% 90 15.9% - 0.0% 125 22.0% 3 049 1,217 894 306 34.2% 148 16.6% 290 32.4% 24 2.7% 137 15.3% 3 050 1,376 431 211 49.0% 9 2.1% 110 25.5% 7 1.6% 83 19.3% 3 051 1,270 977 575 58.9% 51 5.2% 105 10.7% 10 1.0% 215 22.0% 3 052 2,358 1,724 313 18.2% 272 15.8% 602 34.9% 6 0.3% 565 32.8% 4 053 873 426 105 24.6% 21 4.9% 50 11.7% - 0.0% 250 58.7% 4 054 2,693 1,864 193 10.4% 269 14.4% 1,205 64.6% 14 0.8% 199 10.7% 7 055 753 479 161 33.6% 59 12.3% 117 24.4% 71 14.8% 75 15.7% 4 056 607 384 188 49.0% 23 6.0% 88 22.9% 35 9.1% 23 6.0% 4 057 1,123 443 152 34.3% 49 11.1% 90 20.3% 20 4.5% 135 30.5% 4 058 1,173 708 417 58.9% 135 19.1% 50 7.1% 20 2.8% 85 12.0% 4 059 791 469 47 10.0% 44 9.4% 273 58.2% 9 1.9% 94 20.0% 4 060 1,337 796 188 23.6% 58 7.3% 327 41.1% 11 1.4% 190 23.9% 4 061 1,507 1,446 545 37.7% 150 10.4% 310 21.4% 45 3.1% 401 27.7% 4 062 2,185 1,058 337 31.9% 111 10.5% 250 23.6% 60 5.7% 285 26.9% Hayward City Council Districting Tool
4 063 857 291 80 27.5% 103 35.4% 55 18.9% - 0.0% 41 14.1% 4 064 1,714 297 96 32.3% - 0.0% 35 11.8% 25 8.4% 121 40.7% 4 065 1,125 418 326 78.0% 76 18.2% 15 3.6% - 0.0% 1 0.2% 4 066 805 456 342 75.0% 1 0.2% 14 3.1% - 0.0% 33 7.2% 4 067 944 290 91 31.4% 154 53.1% 40 13.8% 10 3.4% - 0.0% 4 068 768 432 365 84.5% - 0.0% 11 2.5% - 0.0% 7 1.6% 4 069 1,088 492 100 20.3% 106 21.5% 163 33.1% 6 1.2% 147 29.9% 4 070 774 348 93 26.7% 53 15.2% 93 26.7% 8 2.3% 76 21.8% 4 071 1,111 763 169 22.1% 101 13.2% 322 42.2% 19 2.5% 137 18.0% 4 072 436 343 88 25.7% 34 9.9% 101 29.4% 7 2.0% 112 32.7% 4 073 1,507 991 410 41.4% 77 7.8% 296 29.9% 24 2.4% 177 17.9% 5 074 1,040 687 358 52.1% 38 5.5% 139 20.2% 26 3.8% 108 15.7% 5 075 965 746 240 32.2% 50 6.7% 215 28.8% 1 0.1% 240 32.2% 5 076 2,150 702 400 57.0% 41 5.8% 95 13.5% 60 8.5% 75 10.7% 5 077 2,653 1,099 369 33.6% 120 10.9% 175 15.9% 175 15.9% 220 20.0% 5 078 1,861 936 335 35.8% 120 12.8% 376 40.2% 4 0.4% 95 10.1% 5 079 1,487 1,012 485 47.9% 142 14.0% 255 25.2% 10 1.0% 50 4.9% 5 080 2,482 1,327 466 35.1% 126 9.5% 500 37.7% 35 2.6% 145 10.9% 5 081 1,862 1,251 620 49.6% 25 2.0% 280 22.4% 30 2.4% 236 18.9% 5 082 880 337 219 65.0% 26 7.7% 57 16.9% 4 1.2% 39 11.6% 5 083 2,120 1,093 582 53.2% 185 16.9% 201 18.4% - 0.0% 100 9.1% 5 084 1,585 782 218 27.9% 163 20.8% 183 23.4% - 0.0% 207 26.5% 5 085 1,180 451 161 35.7% 15 3.3% 208 46.1% 16 3.5% 41 9.1% 5 086 1,915 986 403 40.9% 228 23.1% 159 16.1% - 0.0% 165 16.7% 5 087 1,156 649 360 55.5% 24 3.7% 74 11.4% 4 0.6% 188 29.0% 6 088 1,024 876 546 62.3% 60 6.8% 105 12.0% - 0.0% 165 18.8% 6 089 3,243 1,799 344 19.1% 416 23.1% 821 45.6% - 0.0% 218 12.1% 6 090 2,040 1,312 574 43.8% 246 18.8% 354 27.0% - 0.0% 153 11.7% 6 091 1,655 744 339 45.6% 6 0.8% 191 25.7% 4 0.5% 188 25.3% 6 092 1,416 899 415 46.2% 228 25.4% 135 15.0% - 0.0% 105 11.7% 6 093 1,469 886 75 8.5% 106 12.0% 375 42.3% 10 1.1% 300 33.9% 6 094 1,183 468 261 55.8% 101 21.6% 36 7.7% 2 0.4% 83 17.7% 6 095 1,353 1,039 341 32.8% 121 11.6% 96 9.2% 21 2.0% 453 43.6% Hayward City Council Districting Tool
6 096 689 566 156 27.6% 44 7.8% 49 8.7% 23 4.1% 233 41.2% 6 097 899 723 95 13.1% 162 22.4% 216 29.9% 24 3.3% 189 26.1% 6 098 1,363 580 312 53.8% 88 15.2% 76 13.1% 17 2.9% 54 9.3% 6 099 331 141 61 43.3% 23 16.3% 29 20.6% 1 0.7% 18 12.8% 6 100 597 254 62 24.4% 69 27.2% 130 51.2% 2 0.8% 13 5.1% 6 101 1,340 572 119 20.8% 236 41.3% 32 5.6% 37 6.5% 182 31.8% 6 102 1,070 791 127 16.1% 75 9.5% 131 16.6% 31 3.9% 405 51.2% 6 103 957 654 137 20.9% 426 65.1% 46 7.0% - 0.0% 100 15.3% 6 104 917 620 125 20.2% 207 33.4% 77 12.4% - 0.0% 195 31.5% 6 105 872 588 194 33.0% 96 16.3% 68 11.6% - 0.0% 128 21.8% 6 106 551 314 104 33.1% 60 19.1% 51 16.2% - 0.0% 97 30.9% 6 107 332 189 80 42.3% 20 10.6% 32 16.9% - 0.0% 40 21.2% 7 108 776 482 139 28.8% 87 18.0% 75 15.6% - 0.0% 148 30.7% 7 109 787 510 65 12.7% 180 35.3% 45 8.8% - 0.0% 220 43.1% 7 110 396 308 84 27.3% 20 6.5% 66 21.4% 7 2.3% 74 24.0% 7 111 1,070 834 206 24.7% 65 7.8% 128 15.3% 7 0.8% 454 54.4% 7 112 2,461 1,907 606 31.8% 374 19.6% 415 21.8% - 0.0% 442 23.2% 7 113 424 254 67 26.4% 58 22.8% 45 17.7% - 0.0% 105 41.3% 7 114 1,408 1,121 60 5.4% 281 25.1% 260 23.2% 30 2.7% 460 41.0% 7 115 1,137 849 232 27.3% 2 0.2% 55 6.5% 80 9.4% 480 56.5% 7 116 1,433 652 155 23.8% 96 14.7% 155 23.8% 20 3.1% 216 33.1% 7 117 1,656 1,166 557 47.8% 93 8.0% 75 6.4% 35 3.0% 361 31.0% 7 118 1,876 1,600 565 35.3% 289 18.1% 385 24.1% 4 0.3% 330 20.6% 7 119 2,293 1,775 160 9.0% 381 21.5% 480 27.0% - 0.0% 750 42.3% 7 120 1,130 648 48 7.4% 88 13.6% 162 25.0% - 0.0% 368 56.8% 7 121 1,703 1,597 451 28.2% 365 22.9% 370 23.2% - 0.0% 356 22.3% 7 122 2,281 1,703 89 5.2% 270 15.9% 430 25.2% - 0.0% 905 53.1% 7 123 1,473 1,092 20 1.8% 126 11.5% 621 56.9% 20 1.8% 241 22.1% FW: Your District Plan has been submitted!1 message
Districting <[email protected]> Tue, May 21, 2024 at 2:43 PM To: HaywardDistricting <[email protected]> CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. ________________________________________
From: No-Reply <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesda, Ma 21, 2024 2:42:27 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada) To: Districting
Subject: Your District Plan has been submitted!
CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
Thank you for submitting the map and description of your district plan. You can stay up to date on the redistricting process by checking the city's website:
A copy of your District submission is attached in these three formats: a PDF, a shapefile, and an equivalency file.
The shapefile and equivalency file can be used in mapping software. The PDF is an easy way to PRINT (show others) what you sent to the Commission, or share it ELECTRONICALLY or on social media to encourage friends and family to participate in this important process.
Thank you again for your participation!
13 attachments
MyCityCouncil_SD_0521202436.csv
10K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0521202436_44.pdf
30K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0521202436.pdf
18K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0521202436.dbf
8K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0521202436.txt
1K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0521202436.shx
1K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0521202438.csv
39K
MyCityCouncil_05212024_44.pdf
30K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0521202436.cst
1K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0521202438_44.pdf
30K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0521202438.pdf
18K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0521202436.prj
1K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0521202436.shp
10K
Submission ID: None
Plan name: Test Plan
District type: City Council District
Starting Map: blank_map
General comments:
Submitted by:
Compliance check:
- Contiguity: N
- Total population % deviation: N
- Assignment: N
I acknowledge that my District map and description will be sent to the City Council: N District name% DeviationComments
Submission ID: MyCityCouncil_SD_0521202436_Test Plane ignore Plan name: Test Plane ignore
District type: City Council District
Starting Map: blank_map
General comments: Please ignore this submission it's a test Submitted by: By Linus
Compliance check:
- Contiguity: N
- Total population % deviation: N
- Assignment: N
I acknowledge that my District map and description will be sent to the City Council: Y District name : Test District Please ignore
% Deviation : 1.34
Comments :
District name : Test District Please ignore
% Deviation : 1.34
Comments :
District name : Test District Please ignore
% Deviation : 1.34
Comments :
FW: My Community Map1 message
Districting <[email protected]> Thu, May 23, 2024 at 8:24 AM To: HaywardDistricting <[email protected]> CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
From: Hayward Community Coalition
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2024 8:21:2 AM UT-: Pacc Time (US & Canada) To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; Districting <[email protected]> Subject: Fwd: My Community Map
CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
Hello,
Attached is a map created by a member of our community! Regards,
HayCoCoa
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Lorraina Hernandez
Date: Wed, May 22, 2024 at 7:47 PM
Subject: My Community Map
To:
Thanks for the zoom! Super cool and good to know. Here’s my community map.
Best,
Lorraina Hernandez
Rainy Designs
Web Development & Design | WCAG Compliant
North Hayward.zip
5K
FW: Community of Interest1 message
Districting <[email protected]> Thu, May 23, 2024 at 8:30 AM To: HaywardDistricting <[email protected]> CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
From: Collin Thormoto
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2024 8:29:54 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada) To: Districting <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Community of Interest
CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
Hello,
Attached is my community of interest, to be used in the districting process.
All the best,
Collin Thormoto
Hayward Resident
MyCACommunity_05232024.zip
9K
FW: Map1 message
Districting <[email protected]> Fri, May 24, 2024 at 7:44 AM To: HaywardDistricting <[email protected]> CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
From: Virginia Ferea
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2024 7:44:38 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada) To: Districting <[email protected]>
Subject: Map
CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
Can you send me a district map
FW: KQED Media Request - Hayward Districting following settlement - 3 p.m. deadline1 message
Districting <[email protected]> Fri, May 24, 2024 at 10:02 AM To: HaywardDistricting <[email protected]> CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. ________________________________________
From: Daniel Hernandez
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2024 10:01:59 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada) To: Districting
Subject: KQED Media Request - Hayward Districting following settlement - 3 p.m. deadline CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
Hello,
My name is Daniel and I am a reporter for KQED.
I am reaching out regarding a press release about Hayward's commitment to districting for voting on city council members via districts.
I am asking for a quick 10-15 minute interview over the phone to talk about how the process is going, especially after the first meeting on May 14 and the upcoming meeting at the end of the month.
I have a 2 p.m. deadline and can talk at a representative's earliest convenience. If so, what's the best number to reach? Thanks,
Daniel
FW: Hayward District Formation - New submission from Contact Us1 message Districting <[email protected]> Sat, May 25, 2024 at 9:01 AM To: HaywardDistricting <[email protected]> CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
From:
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2024 9:00:50 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada) To:
Districting <[email protected]>
Subject: Hayward District Formation - New submission from Contact Us CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
Name
ron dingel
Email
Message
I for one want to vote on all my city council members not just one
FW: Your District Plan has been submitted!1 message
Districting <[email protected]> Sun, May 26, 2024 at 3:34 PM To: HaywardDistricting <[email protected]> CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. ________________________________________
From: No-Reply <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2024 3:33:16 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada) To: Districting
Subject: Your District Plan has been submitted!
CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
Thank you for submitting the map and description of your district plan. You can stay up to date on the districting process by checking the city's website maphayward.org:
A copy of your District submission is attached in these three formats: a PDF, a shapefile, and an equivalency file.
The shapefile and equivalency file can be used in mapping software. The PDF is an easy way to PRINT (show others) what you sent to the City Council, or share it ELECTRONICALLY or on social media to encourage friends and family to participate in this important process.
Thank you again for your participation!
14 attachments
MyCityCouncil_SD_0526202443.pdf
19K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0526202443.shx
1K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0526202443.cst
1K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0526202443_62.pdf
35K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0526202443_67.pdf
30K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0526202443.shp
56K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0526202443_63.pdf
33K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0526202443_61.pdf
37K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0526202443_66.pdf
30K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0526202443.dbf
36K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0526202443.csv
36K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0526202443.txt
2K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0526202443.prj
1K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0526202443_65.pdf
30K
Submission ID: MyCityCouncil_SD_0526202443_Atherton_1
Plan name: Atherton_1
District type: City Council District
Starting Map: blank_map
General comments: These districts were constructed in a clockwise fashion, starting with Downtown / North (North Hayward, Downtown, Upper B Street, Burbank); to the Hayward Hills (Mission-Foothill, Hayward Highlands, Mission-Garin); to South Hayward (Fairway Park, Tennyson-Alquire); to Eden (Eden Shores, Glen Eden, Mt. Eden); to Northwest Hayward (Southgate, Longwood-Winton-Grove, Santa Clara); and finishing with the Triangle (Jackson Triangle, Whitman-Mocine. Harder-Tennyson). All districts are within 5 percent of the ideal size, and four of the six districts are within 1 percent of ideal district size. This plan would have two Asian plurality districts (Hills, Eden); and four Latino plurality districts (Downtown, South, Triangle, Northwest).
Submitted by: Chuck Purvis
Compliance check:
- Contiguity: N
- Total population % deviation: N
- Assignment: N
I acknowledge that my District map and description will be sent to the City Council: Y District name % DeviationComments
Hills -2.1
Northwest -0.34
Eden -0.21
Downtown North0.36
South 1.07
Triangle 0.86
District name : Downtown North
% Deviation : 0.36
Comments :
District name : Triangle
% Deviation : 0.86
Comments :
District name : Eden
% Deviation : -0.21
Comments :
District name : Hills
% Deviation : -2.1
Comments :
District name : South
% Deviation : 1.07
Comments :
District name : Northwest
% Deviation : -0.34
Comments :
FW: Ideal district population1 message
Districting <[email protected]> Sun, May 26, 2024 at 6:00 PM To: HaywardDistricting <[email protected]> CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
From: Grant Sakakihara
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2024 5:58:27 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada) To: Districting <[email protected]>
Subject: Ideal district population
CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
Hello,
The City of Hayward Districting Tool User Guide (https://files.publicredistricting.com/user_guide.pdf) states that the ideal district population is 22,237 (page 1). However, it appears based on the population data on the publicredistricting.com website, the ideal population per district must be around 27,000. Can the User Guide or the website be updated so that users know how much the ideal population is before they start making districts on the website? Thanks!
Grant
FW: Your District Plan has been submitted!1 message
Districting <[email protected]> Mon, May 27, 2024 at 9:21 PM To: HaywardDistricting <[email protected]> CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. ________________________________________
From: No-Reply <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2024 9:20:26 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada) To: ; Districting
Subject: Your District Plan has been submitted!
CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
Thank you for submitting the map and description of your district plan. You can stay up to date on the districting process by checking the city's website maphayward.org:
A copy of your District submission is attached in these three formats: a PDF, a shapefile, and an equivalency file.
The shapefile and equivalency file can be used in mapping software. The PDF is an easy way to PRINT (show others) what you sent to the City Council, or share it ELECTRONICALLY or on social media to encourage friends and family to participate in this important process.
Thank you again for your participation!
14 attachments
MyCityCouncil_SD_0527202441.pdf
18K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0527202441_54.pdf
32K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0527202441_50.pdf
28K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0527202441.txt
1K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0527202441.csv
28K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0527202441_53.pdf
30K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0527202441.shp
56K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0527202441.shx
1K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0527202441.dbf
36K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0527202441.prj
1K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0527202441_51.pdf
30K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0527202441.cst
1K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0527202441_52.pdf
36K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0527202441_49.pdf
30K
Submission ID: MyCityCouncil_SD_0527202441_Plan A
Plan name: Plan A
District type: City Council District
Starting Map: blank_map
General comments: Compact, contiguous, nearly equal districts prepared without looking at the census category numbers. I will submit an identical spreadsheet version by email.
Submitted by: Dave Robinson
Compliance check:
- Contiguity: N
- Total population % deviation: N
- Assignment: N
I acknowledge that my District map and description will be sent to the City Council: Y District name% DeviationComments
4 1.69
3 0.68
1 -0.21
2 -2.25
5 1.36
6 -1.38
District name : 1
% Deviation : -0.21
Comments :
District name : 2
% Deviation : -2.25
Comments :
District name : 3
% Deviation : 0.68
Comments :
District name : 4
% Deviation : 1.69
Comments :
District name : 5
% Deviation : 1.36
Comments :
District name : 6
% Deviation : -1.38
Comments :
FW: District spreadsheet submission1 message
Districting <[email protected]> Mon, May 27, 2024 at 9:26 PM To: HaywardDistricting <[email protected]> CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
From: Dave Robinson
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2024 9:25:06 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada) To: Districting <[email protected]>
Subject: District spreadsheet submission
CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
I have attached a city council districting proposal prepared using the spreadsheet tool. I separately created and submitted an identical proposal using the online mapping tool. A map generated by the online tool is on a separate tab.
HCC_DistrictingProposal_Robinson_6Dist_240525.xlsx
1852K
Hayward City Council Districting Tool
Population Dev % Total Latino % Latino NL Black % NL Black NL Asian % NL Asian NL HPI % NL HPI NL White
% NL
White
163,172 102,820 32,423 31.5% 12,608 12.3% 31,868 31.0% 2,365 2.3% 21,470 20.9% - - - 0.0% - 0.0% - 0.0% - 0.0% - 0.0% 27,139 -0.21% 19,254 5,627 29.2% 1,751 9.1% 8,575 44.5% 299 1.6% 2,573 13.4% 26,582 -2.26% 15,239 5,809 38.1% 1,495 9.8% 4,542 29.8% 299 2.0% 2,740 18.0% 27,570 1.38% 15,669 5,303 33.8% 3,083 19.7% 3,319 21.2% 192 1.2% 3,590 22.9% 27,495 1.10% 19,855 4,157 20.9% 3,220 16.2% 5,207 26.2% 288 1.5% 6,562 33.0% 27,566 1.36% 13,923 5,356 38.5% 1,509 10.8% 3,307 23.8% 690 5.0% 2,748 19.7% 26,820 -1.38% 18,880 6,171 32.7% 1,550 8.2% 6,918 36.6% 597 3.2% 3,257 17.3% 27,195.33
-2.3%
1.4%
3.63%
4 5
Ideal Pop:
Lowest District
Dev %:
Highest District
Dev %:
Total Plan
Range <~~~ A plan range up to 10% is considered legally allowable.
Segment List
(Only type District numbers 1-7 in the "Dist #" column; Do not type anywhere else; Do not sort columns) Unassigned
1 2
3 6
City
Name: Dave Robinson
Org or Group: Hayward at large
Tell Us About
Your Plan: Compact, contiguous, nearly equal districts prepared without looking at the census category numbers.
District Tabulator
( Do not type anywhere on this table; Do not sort columns) Population (2020
Census) Citizen Voting Age Population (DOJ Special Tab 2018-2022) District
Hayward City Council Districting Tool
Dist
# Segment Population Total Latino % Latino NL Black % NL Black NL Asian % NL Asian NL HPI % NL HPI NL
White
% NL
White
1 001 3,404 3,076 935 30.4% 200 6.5% 1,561 50.7% 60 2.0% 315 10.2% 1 002 1,758 1,176 275 23.4% 85 7.2% 621 52.8% 25 2.1% 170 14.5% 1 003 1,733 1,358 381 28.1% 136 10.0% 705 51.9% 55 4.1% 60 4.4% 1 004 1,752 1,499 736 49.1% 192 12.8% 510 34.0% - 0.0% 36 2.4% 1 005 1,542 691 180 26.0% 26 3.8% 264 38.2% 15 2.2% 185 26.8% 1 006 373 250 107 42.8% 7 2.8% 73 29.2% - 0.0% 56 22.4% 1 007 897 597 314 52.6% 39 6.5% 117 19.6% - 0.0% 129 21.6% 1 008 1,378 940 330 35.1% 25 2.7% 110 11.7% 55 5.9% 255 27.1% 1 009 1,821 1,220 485 39.8% 174 14.3% 301 24.7% - 0.0% 201 16.5% 1 010 854 975 380 39.0% 70 7.2% 415 42.6% 20 2.1% 90 9.2% 1 011 864 576 240 41.7% 26 4.5% 214 37.2% - 0.0% 94 16.3% 1 012 1,239 735 18 2.4% 93 12.7% 560 76.2% - 0.0% 37 5.0% 1 013 1,005 596 7 1.2% 48 8.1% 525 88.1% - 0.0% 33 5.5% 1 014 1,539 942 105 11.1% 96 10.2% 500 53.1% - 0.0% 140 14.9% 1 015 65 28 - 0.0% 12 42.9% 1 3.6% - 0.0% 7 25.0% 1 016 74 32 2 6.3% 37 115.6% - 0.0% - 0.0% 9 28.1% 1 017 504 221 2 0.9% 26 11.8% 44 19.9% - 0.0% 145 65.6% 2 018 2,304 1,129 467 41.4% 164 14.5% 266 23.6% 1 0.1% 216 19.1% 2 019 2,784 825 467 56.6% 11 1.3% 140 17.0% 80 9.7% 127 15.4% 2 020 1,129 676 175 25.9% 11 1.6% 325 48.1% - 0.0% 135 20.0% 2 021 922 450 130 28.9% 20 4.4% 70 15.6% 15 3.3% 210 46.7% 2 022 1,442 1,190 420 35.3% 130 10.9% 310 26.1% 20 1.7% 300 25.2% 2 023 366 206 106 51.5% 7 3.4% 62 30.1% - 0.0% 31 15.0% 2 024 1,118 631 185 29.3% 53 8.4% 233 36.9% 4 0.6% 149 23.6% 2 025 802 570 105 18.4% 25 4.4% 310 54.4% 15 2.6% 115 20.2% 2 026 916 767 270 35.2% 157 20.5% 210 27.4% 15 2.0% 110 14.3% 2 027 1,364 676 171 25.3% 74 10.9% 214 31.7% 38 5.6% 132 19.5% 2 028 1,083 791 254 32.1% 128 16.2% 231 29.2% 27 3.4% 108 13.7% 1 029 1,502 1,064 260 24.4% 133 12.5% 516 48.5% 11 1.0% 135 12.7% Population (2020
Census) Citizen Voting Age Population (DOJ Special Tab 2018-2022) Hayward City Council Districting Tool
1 030 1,231 935 268 28.7% 16 1.7% 595 63.6% 4 0.4% 56 6.0% 1 031 1,140 664 307 46.2% 98 14.8% 198 29.8% 33 5.0% 15 2.3% 1 032 1,556 1,127 226 20.1% 176 15.6% 539 47.8% 2 0.2% 198 17.6% 1 033 908 552 69 12.5% 36 6.5% 206 37.3% 19 3.4% 207 37.5% 6 034 3,232 1,974 966 48.9% 125 6.3% 457 23.2% 155 7.9% 226 11.4% 6 035 1,527 1,113 591 53.1% 143 12.8% 173 15.5% 61 5.5% 99 8.9% 6 036 1,726 1,260 109 8.7% 33 2.6% 675 53.6% - 0.0% 475 37.7% 6 037 175 126 16 12.7% 18 14.3% 10 7.9% - 0.0% 50 39.7% 6 038 1,142 859 273 31.8% 23 2.7% 236 27.5% 97 11.3% 281 32.7% 6 039 1,610 1,206 312 25.9% 62 5.1% 589 48.8% 63 5.2% 69 5.7% 6 040 1,275 905 297 32.8% 72 8.0% 252 27.8% 30 3.3% 112 12.4% 6 041 1,611 1,131 274 24.2% 73 6.5% 462 40.8% 87 7.7% 179 15.8% 6 042 1,459 1,010 239 23.7% 98 9.7% 467 46.2% 28 2.8% 170 16.8% 6 043 1,157 1,063 532 50.0% 45 4.2% 385 36.2% 25 2.4% 65 6.1% 5 044 1,871 1,010 195 19.3% 35 3.5% 365 36.1% 130 12.9% 280 27.7% 6 045 1,731 944 511 54.1% 92 9.7% 225 23.8% - 0.0% 120 12.7% 6 046 1,805 2,051 285 13.9% 185 9.0% 1,475 71.9% - 0.0% 96 4.7% 6 047 1,134 645 125 19.4% 10 1.6% 315 48.8% 4 0.6% 190 29.5% 6 048 1,015 567 236 41.6% 91 16.0% 90 15.9% - 0.0% 125 22.0% 6 049 1,217 894 306 34.2% 148 16.6% 290 32.4% 24 2.7% 137 15.3% 6 050 1,376 431 211 49.0% 9 2.1% 110 25.5% 7 1.6% 83 19.3% 6 051 1,270 977 575 58.9% 51 5.2% 105 10.7% 10 1.0% 215 22.0% 6 052 2,358 1,724 313 18.2% 272 15.8% 602 34.9% 6 0.3% 565 32.8% 4 053 873 426 105 24.6% 21 4.9% 50 11.7% - 0.0% 250 58.7% 4 054 2,693 1,864 193 10.4% 269 14.4% 1,205 64.6% 14 0.8% 199 10.7% 4 055 753 479 161 33.6% 59 12.3% 117 24.4% 71 14.8% 75 15.7% 5 056 607 384 188 49.0% 23 6.0% 88 22.9% 35 9.1% 23 6.0% 5 057 1,123 443 152 34.3% 49 11.1% 90 20.3% 20 4.5% 135 30.5% 5 058 1,173 708 417 58.9% 135 19.1% 50 7.1% 20 2.8% 85 12.0% 5 059 791 469 47 10.0% 44 9.4% 273 58.2% 9 1.9% 94 20.0% 5 060 1,337 796 188 23.6% 58 7.3% 327 41.1% 11 1.4% 190 23.9% 5 061 1,507 1,446 545 37.7% 150 10.4% 310 21.4% 45 3.1% 401 27.7% 5 062 2,185 1,058 337 31.9% 111 10.5% 250 23.6% 60 5.7% 285 26.9% Hayward City Council Districting Tool
5 063 857 291 80 27.5% 103 35.4% 55 18.9% - 0.0% 41 14.1% 5 064 1,714 297 96 32.3% - 0.0% 35 11.8% 25 8.4% 121 40.7% 5 065 1,125 418 326 78.0% 76 18.2% 15 3.6% - 0.0% 1 0.2% 5 066 805 456 342 75.0% 1 0.2% 14 3.1% - 0.0% 33 7.2% 5 067 944 290 91 31.4% 154 53.1% 40 13.8% 10 3.4% - 0.0% 5 068 768 432 365 84.5% - 0.0% 11 2.5% - 0.0% 7 1.6% 5 069 1,088 492 100 20.3% 106 21.5% 163 33.1% 6 1.2% 147 29.9% 5 070 774 348 93 26.7% 53 15.2% 93 26.7% 8 2.3% 76 21.8% 5 071 1,111 763 169 22.1% 101 13.2% 322 42.2% 19 2.5% 137 18.0% 5 072 436 343 88 25.7% 34 9.9% 101 29.4% 7 2.0% 112 32.7% 5 073 1,507 991 410 41.4% 77 7.8% 296 29.9% 24 2.4% 177 17.9% 5 074 1,040 687 358 52.1% 38 5.5% 139 20.2% 26 3.8% 108 15.7% 2 075 965 746 240 32.2% 50 6.7% 215 28.8% 1 0.1% 240 32.2% 5 076 2,150 702 400 57.0% 41 5.8% 95 13.5% 60 8.5% 75 10.7% 5 077 2,653 1,099 369 33.6% 120 10.9% 175 15.9% 175 15.9% 220 20.0% 2 078 1,861 936 335 35.8% 120 12.8% 376 40.2% 4 0.4% 95 10.1% 2 079 1,487 1,012 485 47.9% 142 14.0% 255 25.2% 10 1.0% 50 4.9% 2 080 2,482 1,327 466 35.1% 126 9.5% 500 37.7% 35 2.6% 145 10.9% 2 081 1,862 1,251 620 49.6% 25 2.0% 280 22.4% 30 2.4% 236 18.9% 3 082 880 337 219 65.0% 26 7.7% 57 16.9% 4 1.2% 39 11.6% 3 083 2,120 1,093 582 53.2% 185 16.9% 201 18.4% - 0.0% 100 9.1% 3 084 1,585 782 218 27.9% 163 20.8% 183 23.4% - 0.0% 207 26.5% 3 085 1,180 451 161 35.7% 15 3.3% 208 46.1% 16 3.5% 41 9.1% 3 086 1,915 986 403 40.9% 228 23.1% 159 16.1% - 0.0% 165 16.7% 3 087 1,156 649 360 55.5% 24 3.7% 74 11.4% 4 0.6% 188 29.0% 3 088 1,024 876 546 62.3% 60 6.8% 105 12.0% - 0.0% 165 18.8% 3 089 3,243 1,799 344 19.1% 416 23.1% 821 45.6% - 0.0% 218 12.1% 2 090 2,040 1,312 574 43.8% 246 18.8% 354 27.0% - 0.0% 153 11.7% 2 091 1,655 744 339 45.6% 6 0.8% 191 25.7% 4 0.5% 188 25.3% 3 092 1,416 899 415 46.2% 228 25.4% 135 15.0% - 0.0% 105 11.7% 3 093 1,469 886 75 8.5% 106 12.0% 375 42.3% 10 1.1% 300 33.9% 3 094 1,183 468 261 55.8% 101 21.6% 36 7.7% 2 0.4% 83 17.7% 3 095 1,353 1,039 341 32.8% 121 11.6% 96 9.2% 21 2.0% 453 43.6% Hayward City Council Districting Tool
3 096 689 566 156 27.6% 44 7.8% 49 8.7% 23 4.1% 233 41.2% 3 097 899 723 95 13.1% 162 22.4% 216 29.9% 24 3.3% 189 26.1% 3 098 1,363 580 312 53.8% 88 15.2% 76 13.1% 17 2.9% 54 9.3% 3 099 331 141 61 43.3% 23 16.3% 29 20.6% 1 0.7% 18 12.8% 3 100 597 254 62 24.4% 69 27.2% 130 51.2% 2 0.8% 13 5.1% 3 101 1,340 572 119 20.8% 236 41.3% 32 5.6% 37 6.5% 182 31.8% 3 102 1,070 791 127 16.1% 75 9.5% 131 16.6% 31 3.9% 405 51.2% 3 103 957 654 137 20.9% 426 65.1% 46 7.0% - 0.0% 100 15.3% 3 104 917 620 125 20.2% 207 33.4% 77 12.4% - 0.0% 195 31.5% 4 105 872 588 194 33.0% 96 16.3% 68 11.6% - 0.0% 128 21.8% 3 106 551 314 104 33.1% 60 19.1% 51 16.2% - 0.0% 97 30.9% 3 107 332 189 80 42.3% 20 10.6% 32 16.9% - 0.0% 40 21.2% 4 108 776 482 139 28.8% 87 18.0% 75 15.6% - 0.0% 148 30.7% 4 109 787 510 65 12.7% 180 35.3% 45 8.8% - 0.0% 220 43.1% 4 110 396 308 84 27.3% 20 6.5% 66 21.4% 7 2.3% 74 24.0% 4 111 1,070 834 206 24.7% 65 7.8% 128 15.3% 7 0.8% 454 54.4% 4 112 2,461 1,907 606 31.8% 374 19.6% 415 21.8% - 0.0% 442 23.2% 4 113 424 254 67 26.4% 58 22.8% 45 17.7% - 0.0% 105 41.3% 4 114 1,408 1,121 60 5.4% 281 25.1% 260 23.2% 30 2.7% 460 41.0% 4 115 1,137 849 232 27.3% 2 0.2% 55 6.5% 80 9.4% 480 56.5% 4 116 1,433 652 155 23.8% 96 14.7% 155 23.8% 20 3.1% 216 33.1% 4 117 1,656 1,166 557 47.8% 93 8.0% 75 6.4% 35 3.0% 361 31.0% 4 118 1,876 1,600 565 35.3% 289 18.1% 385 24.1% 4 0.3% 330 20.6% 4 119 2,293 1,775 160 9.0% 381 21.5% 480 27.0% - 0.0% 750 42.3% 4 120 1,130 648 48 7.4% 88 13.6% 162 25.0% - 0.0% 368 56.8% 4 121 1,703 1,597 451 28.2% 365 22.9% 370 23.2% - 0.0% 356 22.3% 4 122 2,281 1,703 89 5.2% 270 15.9% 430 25.2% - 0.0% 905 53.1% 4 123 1,473 1,092 20 1.8% 126 11.5% 621 56.9% 20 1.8% 241 22.1% Hayward City Council Districting Tool - City Map
Total population from online tool Dist%Latino%White%Black%Asian%MMR1 28.411.8 6.546.1 1.8bay2 48.610.8 8.226.3 1.6mall3 45.3 13 12.224.2 1.3north4 30.322.213.928.5 1.6hills5 54.8 8.2 7.522.6 1.6central6 39.512.9 6.235.9 1.6south
Total Population is California Statewide Adjusted Data via the California Statewide Database: https://statewidedatabase.org/redistricting2021/ Citizen Voting Age Population is based on disaggregated block data of the DOJ Special Tabulation of the American Community Survey from 2018- 2022, via the California Statewide Database: https://statewidedatabase.org/d20/2024_cvap.html Good morning, Dave Robinson: Thank you for your email. I will coordinate with City staff to show your slides on screen while you deliver your public comment. Your slides will be added to documents/emails received for thismeeting. We look forward to meeting you this evening. Regards, Miriam LensCity Clerk City of Hayward | 777 B Street | Hayward, CA 94541 Website: https://www.hayward-ca.gov/
From: Dave Robinson Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2024 7:08 AMTo: List-Mayor-Council <[email protected]>Subject: Comment for May 28 meeting item 1 CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
Hello - I intend to deliver a public comment in person at this evening's meeting regarding district maps. I prepared some slides to accompany the comment, which are attached. I wasinspired by a prior commenter's use of the document camera, but my color toner cartridge is not working and I do not have time to go to Copy Pacific, so I hope this will work. Asa fallback, I can put my iPad under the document camera, but this might have too much glare. Emailing the slides also makes sure the city will have them in case I fail to appearat the meeting. Thank you,Dave Robinson
Hayward City Council District
Map Proposal
Dave Robinson
5/28/2024
Here is the map.
Checklist
1.Equal population
•About as close as possible given block sizes on spreadsheet tool.
2.Federal Voting Rights Act compliant
•Did not use census category data.
3.Contiguity
•No islands.
4.Respect for Communities of Interest
•Used geographic obstacles as boundaries.
•Community input will be helpful.
5.Compactness
•No tentacles on internal boundaries.
Statistics
•Some districts have about double the % vs. others
in each census category.
•No majority district for any category.
Context: Other current maps presumably meet criteria.
Transit, water, sewer, park, and other
districts already divide the city.
Professionally drawn maps in Fremont and Union City
have more irregular boundaries.Maps from https://www.acgov.org/rov_app/edata Are we done?
•Drawing equal-sized,
compact, contiguous, FVRA-
compliant districts is easy.
•Communities of Interest are
rarely compact, contiguous,
and non-overlapping.
•Figuring this out is the hard
part.
•Maybe the end result will still
look like this!
FW: Your District Plan has been submitted!1 message
Districting <[email protected]> Tue, May 28, 2024 at 10:31 AM To: HaywardDistricting <[email protected]> CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. ________________________________________
From: No-Reply <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2024 10:30:19 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada) To: ; Districting
Subject: Your District Plan has been submitted!
CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
Thank you for submitting the map and description of your district plan. You can stay up to date on the districting process by checking the city's website maphayward.org:
A copy of your District submission is attached in these three formats: a PDF, a shapefile, and an equivalency file.
The shapefile and equivalency file can be used in mapping software. The PDF is an easy way to PRINT (show others) what you sent to the City Council, or share it ELECTRONICALLY or on social media to encourage friends and family to participate in this important process.
Thank you again for your participation!
14 attachments
MyCityCouncil_SD_0528202445_82.pdf
29K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0528202445_80.pdf
31K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0528202445.prj
1K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0528202445.shp
55K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0528202445.pdf
19K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0528202445_83.pdf
29K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0528202445.txt
3K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0528202445.shx
1K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0528202445_78.pdf
30K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0528202445.csv
48K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0528202445.dbf
36K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0528202445_92.pdf
35K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0528202445_79.pdf
31K
MyCityCouncil_SD_0528202445.cst
1K
Submission ID: MyCityCouncil_SD_0528202445_District Proposal - Yest, R Plan name: District Proposal - Yest, R
District type: City Council District
Starting Map: blank_map
General comments: I have constructed the districts to meet the requirements of population balance, contiguity, and reasonably compactedness. Communities of interest—as illustrated in the provided spreadsheet and my own understanding of the city I live in—help shaped the neighborhoods that I wanted to keep intact. But, with our population being diverse across the city, there are no large communities of interest that will nicely fit into one district. For example, the AAPI community has a large population percentage in the northwest and southeast regions. It would have been impossible to construct one district and still maintain the requirements, such as reasonable compactedness or contiguity. My goal was to ensure that I maintained the neighborhoods within the communities of interest. Once identified, I used geographic features, such as roads, rail, water, etc, to provide a natural social boundaries.
Submitted by: Robert Yest PhD
Compliance check:
- Contiguity: N
- Total population % deviation: N
- Assignment: N
I acknowledge that my District map and description will be sent to the City Council: Y District name : Chabot
% Deviation : 3.88
Comments : I built this to respect the community of interest within the Latino community using 880 and 92 as physical boundaries. I had to extend eastward to include more to meet the population requirement.
District name : Industrial - Huntwood
% Deviation : 3.7
Comments : I chose this area to be respectful of the community of interest within the AAPI community. Also I used major geographical boundaries to help shape the region.
District name : Jackson - Downtown
% Deviation : 2.28
Comments : I chose this area to be respectful of the community of interest within the Latino community.
The downtown area was included to meet the population requirement.
District name : Tennyson - Harder
% Deviation : -1.92
Comments : I chose this area to be respectful of the community of interest within the Latino community.
Also I used major geographical boundaries (roads) to help shape the region.
District name : CSU - Hayward Hills
% Deviation : -3.18
Comments : Due to the contiguity requirement, compactness, and the shape of the city's boundaries in the northeast, most of this district had to be this way. I used Foothill and Mission blvds as my boundary.
District name : Glen Eden
% Deviation : -4.74
Comments : I built this to respect the community of interest within the AAPI community using 880 and 92 as physical boundaries. I had to extend eastward to include more to meet the population requirement.
FW: Hayward District Formation - New submission from Contact Us1 message Districting <[email protected]> Tue, May 28, 2024 at 1:54 PM To: HaywardDistricting <[email protected]> CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
From:
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2024 1:54:12 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada) To:
Districting <[email protected]>
Subject: Hayward District Formation - New submission from Contact Us CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
Name
Dwight Turner
Email
Message
The password maybe the id also are incorrect for tonight's meeting.
FW: COI for districting1 message
Districting <[email protected]> Tue, May 28, 2024 at 1:56 PM To: HaywardDistricting <[email protected]> CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
From: dwight turner
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2024 1:56:09 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada) To: Districting <[email protected]>
Cc: Dwight Turner
Subject: COI for districting
CAUTION:This is an external email. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
Districting ProcessCommunity of Interest
My Community
1. Describe your community
Community Name:
Hayward Hills
Description
Unique Shared Concerns:
Topographically this is some of the highest elevations in the city. So the weather is different here than the flat lands. This area occasionally experiences snow, hail, thick fog, high winds and freezing rain. Therefore road and driveway grades should consider these possible conditions.
Road egress is largely dependent on Hayward Boulevard and Fairview Road. Therefore the area is very sensitive to increase traffic during normal conditions and residents have expresses serious concern in emergency situations that could close access to either/both road or the road becomes clogged with excess traffic.
Wildland interface areas share a boundary with much of this area. Therefore wildfires, erosion and flooding are all situations of high concern.
Some residents have reported insurance coverage issues due to these conditions.
Common Shared Concerns:
Maintaining Home Values is a concern since many of the homes were built less than 30 years ago. Therefore anything that might disrupt the appreciation trend would be viewed as adverse.
Security is a big concern. Since these communities are remote to rest of the city it appears that they get less patrols and poor response.
Maintain Diversity. It appears these areas are very diverse and peaceful and we want to continue to maintain this.
Boundary of Community of Interest
At a minimum it should include
Prominence
Stone Brae
Bailey Ranch
Possible other communities
Other communities along the Hayward Boulevard needed to meet the size requirement for the district.