Cities Index.
Attachment IV Engineer's Report

Hayward City Council
June 25, 2024

Document
Attachment IV Engineer's Report
Meeting
June 25, 2024
Body
Hayward City Council
Pages
90
Original file
10.6 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on hayward.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

Page i
Fiscal Year 2025 ENGINEER’S REPORT
City of Hayward
Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District 96-1
June 2025
Final Report

ATTACHMENT IV
City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025
Page i
City of Hayward
City C ouncil
Mark Salinas, Mayor
Francisco Zermeño, Mayor Pro Tempore
Angela Andrews, Council Member
Ray Bonilla Jr., Council Member
Dan Goldstein, Council Member
Julie Roche, Council Member
George Syrop, Council Member
Clerk of the Council
Miriam Lens
City Manager
Kelly McAdoo
Maintenance Service Directo r
Todd Rullman
City Attorney
Michael Lawson
Engineer of Work
SCI Consulting Group
City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025
Page ii

Table of Contents
Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 Overview.................................................................................................................................... 1 Background ................................................................................................................................ 1 Method of Apportionment ........................................................................................................ 4 Zone Classification ..................................................................................................................... 5 Assessment Roll ......................................................................................................................... 6 Estimate of Costs ....................................................................................................................... 6 Legislative Analysis .................................................................................................................... 7 Inflation Factor Allowance Overview ........................................................................................ 7 Noticing, Public Comment, and Public Hearing ......................................................................... 8 Plans and Specifications ............................................................................................. 9 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 9 Description of District ................................................................................................................ 9 Description of Improvements ................................................................................................... 9 Zone 1 (Huntwood Ave.& Panjon St.)...................................................................................... 11 Zone 2 (Harder Rd. & Mocine Ave.) ........................................................................................ 14 Zone 3 (Prominence) ............................................................................................................... 17 Zone 4 (Stratford Village) ........................................................................................................ 21 Zone 5 (Soto Rd. & Plum Tree St.) ........................................................................................... 25 Zone 6 (Peppertree Park) ........................................................................................................ 28 Zone 7 (Twin Bridges) .............................................................................................................. 31 Zone 8 (Capitola Street)........................................................................................................... 34 Zone 9 (Orchard Ave.) ............................................................................................................. 37 Zone 10 (Eden Shores Residential) .......................................................................................... 40 Zone 11 (Stonebrae Country Club) .......................................................................................... 43 Zone 12 (Spindrift - Eden Shore East) ...................................................................................... 47 Zone 13 (Cannery Place) .......................................................................................................... 51 Zone 14 (La Vista) .................................................................................................................... 54 Zone 15 (Cadence) ................................................................................................................... 57 Zone 16 (Blackstone) ............................................................................................................... 59 Zone 17 (Parkside Heights) ...................................................................................................... 62 Zone 18 (SoHay) ...................................................................................................................... 65 Assessment .............................................................................................................. 69 Vicinity Map ............................................................................................................. 71 Assessment Diagram ................................................................................................ 72 City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025
Page iii

List of Tables
Table 1- Description Of Benefit Zones ............................................................................................. 2 Table 2- Assessment Amounts By Benefit Zone .............................................................................. 3 Table 3: Estimated Cash Balance Changes Per Benefit Zone ........................................................... 4

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 1 ends

Introduction
Overview
Each fiscal year an Engineer's Report (the "Report") is prepared and presented to the City of Hayward City Council (the "Council") describing the City’s Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 96-1 (the "District"). The Report details changes to the D istrict or improvements, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations, and servicing of the improvements, and the proposed budget and assessments for that fiscal year.

Through a professional service agreement with SCI Consulting Group (the “Consultant”), the City of Hayward (the “City”) has requested the Consultant prepare and file the Report for the referenced fiscal year. This is the detailed Report for Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2025 regarding the District and the proposed assessments to be levied on the properties therein to provide ongoing funding for the costs and expenses required to service and maintain landscape and lighting improvements associated with and resulting from development of properties within the District, in accordance with the proportional special benefits the properties receive from the improvements.

Following the preparation of the annual Report, a public hearing is held before the Council to allow the public an opportunity to hear and be heard regarding the District. Following consideration of all public comments and written protests at the noticed p ublic hearing, and review of the Report, the Council may order amendments to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the Report, and confirmation of the assessments, the Council shall order the levy and collection of asse ssments for FY 202 5. In such case, the levy information will be submitted to the Alameda County Auditor/Controller and included as assessments on the property tax roll for the various services provided in FY 2025.

Background
In November 1996, the voters of California adopted Proposition 218 (the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act"), which has been codified as Articles XIII C and XIII D of the California Constitution. The 1972 Act permits the creation of benefit zones within any indiv idual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). If, in any year, the proposed annual assessments for the District exceed the maximum assessments previously approved in a Proposition 218 proceeding (or grandfathered under Proposition 218), such an assessment would be considered a new or increased assessment and be confirmed through a mailed property owner protest ballot proceeding before that new or increased assessment could be imposed.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 2 ends

The District originally contained six benefit zones when initially formed in 1996, however, now totals eighteen benefit zones which are presented in this Report. This Report and the information contained herein reflect the proposed budget for each of the v arious services provided by the District and the rates and assessments applicable to those, as required by Proposition 218.

Table 1 - Description Of Benefit Zones

A B C D E
Zone Name/Location Year Formed Type of
Development
Number of Assessed
Parcels/SFE
1 Huntwood Ave. and Panjon St. 1990 Residential 30
2 Harder Rd. and Mocine Ave. 1991 Residential 85
3 Prominence 1992 Residential 155
4 Stratford Village 1995 Residential 174
5 Soto Rd. and Plum Tree St. 1995 Residential 38
6 Pepper Tree Park 1982 Industrial 11
7 Twin Bridges 1998 Residential 348
8 Capitola St. 1999 Residential 24
9 Orchard Ave. 2000 Residential 74
10 Eden Shores 2003 Residential 534
11 Stonebrae 2006, 2018, 2020 Residential 644
12 Eden Shores East (Spindrift) 2007, 2016 Residential 379 13 Cannery Place 2008 Residential 599
14 La Vista 2016 Residential 179
15 Cadence 2017 Residential 206
16 Blackstone 2016 Residential 157
17 Parkside Heights 2019 Residential 97
18 SoHay 2019 Residential 433
4,167
Self-Maintained.

TABLE 1: DESCRIPTION OF BENEFIT ZONES
Total Assessed Parcels:

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 3 ends

The following table summarizes the FY 2025 assessment rates per benefit zone.

Table 2 - Assessment Amounts By Benefit Zone

A B C D E F G H I J
Zone Name/Location # Parcels CPI Adj
FY 2025 Max
Base
Assessment
FY 2025
Rate
FY 2024
Assessment
1 Huntwood Ave. and Panjon St. 30 No 295.83 235.94 224.70 Incr 11.24 5% 2 Harder Rd. and Mocine Ave. 85 No 193.39 135.45 129.00 Incr 6.45 5% 3 Prominence 155 Yes 1,144.88 1,069.29 1,008.76 Incr 60.53 6% 4 Stratford Village 174 No 180.00 126.93 123.23 Incr 3.70 3% 5 Soto Rd. and Plum Tree St. 38 No 258.67 258.67 258.67 None - 0% 6 Pepper Tree Park 11 No 2.61 2.61 2.61 None - 0% 7 Twin Bridges 348 Yes 1,197.48 664.83 627.20 Incr 37.63 6% 8 Capitola St. 24 Yes 856.44 205.68 195.89 Incr 9.79 5% 9 Orchard Ave. 74 Yes 228.66 38.41 36.24 Incr 2.17 6% 10 Eden Shores 534 Yes 1,363.60 344.49 316.05 Incr 28.44 9% 11a Stonebrae (Developed) 617 Yes 1,934.08 408.18 374.48 Incr 33.70 9% 11b Stonebrae (Undeveloped) 27 Yes 580.22 216.34 198.47 Incr 17.87 9% 12a Eden Shores - East 261 Yes 256.28 104.16 98.26 Incr 5.90 6% 12b Eden Shores East (Spindrift) 118 Yes 246.98 104.16 98.26 Incr 5.90 6% 13 Cannery Place 599 Yes 1,454.34 417.78 394.13 Incr 23.65 6% 14 La Vista 179 Yes 747.04 683.65 683.65 None - 0% 15 Cadence 206 Yes 724.44 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 16a Blackstone (Zone A) 133 Yes 516.66 516.66 501.60 Incr 15.06 3% 16b Blackstone (Zone B) 24 Yes 542.48 542.48 526.68 Incr 15.80 3% 17 Parkside Heights 97 Yes 608.86 582.88 555.12 Incr 27.76 5% 18a SoHay Zone A (Developed) 192 Yes 464.38 300.00 300.00 None - 0% 18b SoHay Zone A (Undeveloped) 69 Yes 139.31 90.00 90.00 None - 0% 18c SoHay Zone B (Developed) 79 Yes 441.16 285.00 285.00 None - 0% 18d SoHay Zone B (Undeveloped) 93 Yes 132.35 85.50 85.50 None - 0% TABLE 2: ASSESSMENT AMOUNTS BY BENEFIT ZONE
Change from last year
City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 4 ends

The following table summarizes the revenue, expenditures, and account balance by benefit zone.

Table 3 - Estimated Cash Balance Changes Per Benefit Zone

Method of Apportionment
Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping and street lighting improvements.

Section 22573 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements."
Zone Name/Location
Est FY 2024
Ending Cash
Balance
FY 2025
Revenue
FY 2025
Expenditures Change
Est FY 2025
Ending Cash
Balance
1 Huntwood Ave. and Panjon St. 17,563 7,209 11,619 (4,410) 13,153 2 Harder Rd. and Mocine Ave. 27,247 11,632 16,818 (5,186) 22,061 3 Prominence 292,058 172,378 275,388 (103,010) 189,048 4 Stratford Village 76,384 24,117 35,542 (11,425) 64,959 5 Soto Rd. and Plum Tree St. 23,739 10,294 11,481 (1,187) 22,552 6 Pepper Tree Park 103,973 13,188 11,822 1,366 105,339 7 Twin Bridges 562,388 230,428 633,164 (402,736) 159,652 8 Capitola St. 49,869 5,252 10,188 (4,936) 44,933 9 Orchard Ave. 9,139 2,834 4,111 (1,277) 7,862 10 Eden Shores 556,854 183,630 684,315 (500,685) 56,170 11 Stonebrae 396,171 259,259 281,120 (21,861) 374,309 12 Eden Shores East (Spindrift) 38,004 38,956 27,374 11,582 49,586 13 Cannery Place 664,247 248,496 303,317 (54,821) 609,426 14 La Vista 268,988 122,373 140,605 (18,231) 250,756 15 Cadence - - - - - 16 Blackstone 168,296 80,471 87,776 (7,305) 160,990 17 Parkside Heights 134,815 58,578 52,744 5,835 140,649 18 SoHay 274,478 125,156 133,747 (8,591) 265,887 3,664,212 1,594,251 2,721,132 (1,126,881) 2,537,331 Self-Maintained.

TABLE 3: ESTIMATED CASH BALANCE CHANGES PER BENEFIT ZONE Cash Balance:

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 5 ends

The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000)) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]."
Proposition 218 also requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. In addition, Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the propo rtional special benefit conferred on the property. Because assessments are levied based on benefit, they are not considered a tax, and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIIIA of the California Constitution.

The 1972 Act permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the im provement" (Sec. 22547). Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax." Article XIIID of the California Constitution provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements, and rights-of-ways.

Zone Classification
Each benefit zone is unique and distinguishable from other benefit zones located within the District. Each benefit zone is evaluated to determine which improvements are of a specific and direct benefit to the parcels in that benefit zone. Once the improvements have been identified, a method of spreading those costs to the benefiting parcels was developed.

As certain subdivisions develop throughout the City of Hayward, they may be annexed into an existing zone or there may be a new zone formed. Each new subdivision is evaluated to determine which improvements are of a specific and direct benefit to the parcels within the subdivision and then a determination is made whether to annex them into an existing zone or whether to form a new zone. The parcels, which benefit from the improvements, are identified and a benefit assessment spread methodology is developed to spread the costs of the improvements to the benefiting parcels.

Details of the various zones in the District, their corresponding number of parcels in each benefit zone, and the method of apportioning the costs of the improvements are in the zone description section.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 6 ends

Assessment Roll
A list of names and addresses of the owners of all parcels, and the description of each lot or parcel within the City’s Landscaping & Lighting Assessment District No. 96 -1 is shown on the last equalized Property Tax Roll of the Assessor of the County of Al ameda, which by reference is hereby made a part of this report.

This list is keyed to the Assessor's Parcel Numbers as shown on the Assessment Roll, which includes the proposed assessment amount for FY 202 5 apportioned to each lot or parcel. The Assessment Roll is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Hayward.

Estimate of Costs
The 1972 Act provides that the total cost of construction, operation, maintenance and servicing of the public landscaping, street lighting, open space facilities, parks, trails, etc. can be recovered by the District. Incidental expenses including administration of the district, engineering fees, legal fees and all other costs associated with the construction, operation, maintenance, and servicing of the district can also be included.

The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the revenues and expenditures for the District. Funds raised by the assessments shall be used only for the purposes as stated herein. Any balance remaining on July 1 at the end of the fiscal year must be carried over to the next fiscal year.

The estimated FY 2025 revenues and expenditures for the proposed District are itemized by zone below. For a detailed breakdown of the operation, maintenance, and servicing costs for each benefit zone, please refer to the budget page following each zone’s description.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 7 ends

Legislative Analysis
Proposition 218 Compliance 1
On November 5, 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218 entitled "Right to Vote on Taxes Act," which added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural req uirements for the formation and administration of assessment districts. These new procedures stipulate that even if assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, future increases in assessments must comply with the provisions of Proposition 218. H owever, if an increase in the assessment was anticipated in the assessment formula (for example, to reflect the CPI or an assessment cap) then the City would be following the provisions of Proposition 218 if the assessments did not exceed the assessment formula.

All the assessments proposed within the FY 2025 Engineer’s Report are equal to or less than the Maximum Base Assessment Rate authorized; therefore, Article XIIID, Section 4 vote requirements do not apply to these proceedings.

Inflation Factor Allowance Overview
No Allowance - Five of the eighteen benefit zones (1, 2, 4, 5, 6) do not have an inflation factor allowance within their respective assessment formula to increase their Maximum Base Assessment.

Allowance - Thirteen of eighteen benefit zones (3, 7-18) have an inflation factor allowance within their respective assessment formula to increase their Maximum Base Assessment Rate annually based upon the change in the prior year’s CPI. Their inflation factor is described below.

Benefit zones 3, 7-13, 17-18 apply the February CPI-U for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA MSA
2 inflation factor. The CPI -U increase from February 202 3 to February 202 4 was 2.36%; therefore, a 2.36% increase was applied to the FY 2025 Maximum Base Assessment Rate for zones 3, 7-13, 17-18.

1 http://www.lao.ca.gov/1996/120196_prop_218/understanding_prop218_1296.html 2 https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/surveymost (Feb 2022 to Feb 2023) City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 8 ends

Benefit zones 12 annexation, 14 -16 apply the December CPI -U for the San Francisco -Oakland- Hayward, CA MSA3 inflation factor, capped at 3.00% per fiscal year. Any change in the CPI in excess of 3.00% shall be cumulatively reserved as the “Unused CPI” and shall be used to increase the maximum authorized assessment rate in years in which the CPI is less than 3%. The CPI-U increase from December 2022 to December 2023 was 2.62% and the unused CPI from previous years is

3.53%; therefore, the Maximum Base Assessment Rate for zones 12 annexation, 14-16 have been increased by 3.00%.

Noticing, Public Comment, and Public Hearing
Noticing and information regarding this report were provided via the following methods: 1) mailed a notice to all affected property owners to provide detail of their recommended FY 202 5 assessment rate and to alert them to three public meetings where they could provide input (May 29, June 4, June 25), and published a legal notice in the East Bay Times on or before June 14, 2024.

On June 25, 2024, the City is proposing to hold a public hearing to provide an opportunity for any interested person to be heard. After the public hearing, the Council may adopt a resolution setting the annual assessment amounts as originally proposed or as modified. Following the adoption of this resolution, the final assessor’s roll will be prepared and filed with the Alameda County Auditor’s Office to be included on the FY 2025 tax roll. Payment of the assessment for each parcel will be made in the same manner and at the same time as payments are made for property taxes.

All funds collected through the assessment must be placed in a special fund and can only be used for the purposes stated within this report.

3 https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CUURS49BSA0
City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 9 ends

Plans and Specifications
Introduction
As required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the annual Engineer's Report includes:
(1) a listing of the proposed assessment amount for each assessable lot or parcel; (2) a description of the improvements to be operated, maintained, and serviced; and (3) an estimated budget.

Description of District
The territory within the District consists of all lots and APNs of land that receive special benefits from the landscape and lighting improvements funded by the District assessments. The boundaries of the District are comprised of eighteen benefit Zones. A PNs within the District are identified and grouped into one of the eighteen designated Zones based on the special benefits properties receive from the District improvements and the authorized Maximum Base Assessments established. The eighteen Zones within the District and the benefits associated with the properties therein are described in more detail in the following pages of this Report. In addition, the individual zone diagrams (maps) are presented in the Assessment Diagram Section of the Report and provide a visual representation of the District showing the boundaries of each benefit zone.

Description of Improvements
The facilities which have been constructed within the District and those which may be subsequently constructed, will be operated, maintained, and serviced as generally described as follows:

The improvements consist of the construction, operation, maintenance, rehabilitation, and servicing of landscaping, street lighting, open space facilities, parks, trails, and appurtenant (pertaining to something that attaches) facilities including but not limited to; personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water, materials, contractual services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services and facilities as described below:

Landscaping Facilities
Landscaping facilities consist of, but are not limited to operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping, irrigation, planting, shrubbery, ground cover, trees, pathways, hardscapes, decorative masonry and concrete walls, fountains, bus shelters, entry gate structures, graffiti removal, fences, and other appurtenant facilities required to provide landscaping within the public rights-of-way and easements within the boundaries of the Assessment District.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 10 ends

Street Lighting Facilities
Street lighting facilities consist of, but are not limited to operation, maintenance and servicing of poles, fixtures, bulbs, conduits, equipment including guys, anchors, posts and pedestals, metering devices and other appurtenant facilities within the public rights-of-way and easements within the boundaries of the Assessment District.

Open Space Facilities
Open space facilities consist of, but are not limited to operation, maintenance and servicing of drainage areas, creeks, ponds, etc. including the removal of trash and debris, sediment, natural and planted vegetation and other appurtenant facilities within the public rights -of-way and easements within the boundaries of the Assessment District.

Park/Trail Facilities
Park/Trail facilities consist of, but are not limited to: operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping, irrigation systems, pedestrian access, asphalt bike pathways, parkways, and the removal of trash and debris, rodent control, used for the support of recreational programs and other appurtenant facilities within the public rights-of-way and easements within the boundaries of the Assessment Districts.

Maintenance
Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual operation, maintenance and servicing of the landscaping, public lighting facilities and appurtenant facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the landscaping, public lighting facilities or appurtenant facilities; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping improvements, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing and treating for disease or injury; and the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste; the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of street lights and other improvements to remove graffiti.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 11 ends

Zone 1 (Huntwood Ave.& Panjon St.)
Tract No. 06041
Formed: November 13, 1990
Resolution Number: 90-256
FY 2025
Maximum Base Assessment Rate: $295.83
Assessment Amount per Parcel: $235.94
Number of Parcels: 30
Assessment Income: $7,078.20

FY 2025 Maximum Base Assessment

Maximum Base Assessment (highest rate that can be charged per parcel).

• Originally set when the zone was created in 1990.

• Is at the maximum, unchanged from the previous year at $295.83 per parcel.

• Includes an annual inflation increase: No.

• Can be increased later: Future increases above the Maximum Base Assessment would require the noticing and balloting of property owners per the requirements of Proposition 218.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 12 ends

FY 2025 Assessment and Income

FY 2025 Services
Services provided to this assessment zone include:

• Landscaping and irrigation: Including an 8-foot-wide landscaped strip along Huntwood Ave. within a landscape easement; and

• Surface maintenance of the street side: Including a 600 -foot masonry wall along Huntwood Ave. The maintenance includes painting, cleaning, graffiti removal, and minor surface repair.

• One-time maintenance: A budget of $3,500 is allocated for additional maintenance, as required.

Note: the ownership and responsibility of the masonry wall as a structure remains with the individual property owners.

Assessment Rate (annual charge per parcel) and Income

• The per parcel charge will increase from the previous year from $224.70 to $235.94.

• The total annual assessment income will equal $7078.

• The recommended assessment rate will generate revenues that are adequate to pay for the expected level of maintenance and to maintain a prudent capital reserve balance.

• Each of the parcels shall be apportioned an equal share of the total assessment for this zone as the special benefit derived by an individual parcel is indistinguishable from each other.

• The current assessment rate is below the Maximum Base Assessment and is sufficient for maintaining levels of service and for keeping a prudent capital reserve balance.

• In future years, if there is a need for additional funds, the assessment may be increased up to the Maximum Base Assessment Rate.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 13 ends

City of Hayward
Landscape and Lighting District Zone 1 - Huntwood Ave. and Panjon St.

Fund 266, Project 3740
Established 1990, 30 Parcels
FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025
Actual Actual Estimated Proposed
Assessment
a. Maximum Base Assessment Amount 295.83 295.83 295.83 295.83 b. Annual Per Parcel Assessment 212.71 214.00 224.70 235.94 c. # of Parcels 30 30 30 30 d. Total Amount Assessed for the District: 6,381 6,420 6,741 7,078 Income
a. Annual Assessment Revenue 6,264 6,433 6,741 7,078 b. Minus County Tax Collection Fee (1.7%) (108) (109) (115) (120) c. Other (547) 251 251 251 d. Total Revenue: 5,608 6,574 6,878 7,209 Services
a. Utilities: Water 406 419 770 847 b. Utilities: PGE 291 266 325 390 c. Landscape Maintenance 1,620 2,111 4,000 4,120 d. One-Time Project/Maintenance - 4,309 4,500 3,500 e. Property Owner Noticing 25 2 2 3 f. Annual Reporting 1,012 480 494 509 g. City Administration 2,060 2,122 2,185 2,251 h. Total Expenditures: 5,414 9,708 12,277 11,619 Account Balance
a. Beginning Account Balance 25,902 26,096 22,963 17,563 b. Net Change (Revenue - Expenditures) 194 (3,134) (5,399) (4,410) c. Ending Account Balance: 26,096 22,963 17,563 13,153 City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 14 ends

Zone 2 (Harder Rd. & Mocine Ave.)
Tract No. 6042
Formed: July 25, 1991
Resolution Number: 91-137
FY 2025
Maximum Base Assessment Rate: $193.39
Assessment Amount per Parcel: $135.45
Number of Parcels: 85
Assessment Income: $11,513.25

FY 2025 Maximum Base Assessment

Maximum Base Assessment (highest rate that can be charged per parcel).

• Originally set when the zone was created in 1991.

• Is at the maximum, unchanged from the previous year at $193.39 per parcel.

• Includes an annual inflation increase: No.

• Can be increased later: Future increases above the Maximum Base Assessment would require the noticing and balloting of property owners per the requirements of Proposition 218.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 15 ends

FY 2025 Assessment and Income

FY 2025 Services

Assessment Rate (annual charge per parcel) and Income

• The per parcel charge will increase from the previous year from $129.00 to $135.45.

• The total annual assessment income will equal $11,514.

• The recommended assessment rate will generate revenues that are adequate to pay for the expected level of maintenance and to maintain a prudent capital reserve balance.

• Each of the parcels shall be apportioned an equal share of the total assessment for this zone as the special benefit derived by an individual parcel is indistinguishable from each other.

• The current assessment rate is below the Maximum Base Assessment and is sufficient for maintaining levels of service and for keeping a prudent capital reserve balance.

• In future years, if there is a need for additional funds, the assessment may be increased up to the Maximum Base Assessment Rate.

Services provided to this assessment zone include:

• Landscaping and irrigation: Including the area between the sidewalk and wall along Harder Road and Mocine Ave. within a landscape easement. • Surface maintenance of the street side : Including maintenance of a 1,000 -foot-long masonry wall along Harder Road, Mocine Ave., and a segment of Sunburst Drive. This maintenance includes painting, cleaning, graffiti removal, and minor surface repair; and
• Surface maintenance of wall: Includes maintenance of an 800-foot-long masonry wall adjacent to the railroad tracks located on the southwest side of Tract No. 6042. This maintenance includes painting, cleaning, graffiti removal, and minor surface repair. • One-time maintenance: A budget of $3,000 is allocated for additional maintenance, as required.

Note: the ownership and responsibility of the masonry wall as a structure remains with the individual property owners.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 16 ends

City of Hayward
Landscape and Lighting District Zone 2 - Harder Rd. & Mocine Ave.

Fund 267, Project 3741
Established 1991, 85 Parcels
FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025
Actual Actual Estimated Proposed
Assessment
a. Maximum Base Assessment Amount 193.39 193.39 193.39 193.39 b. Annual Per Parcel Assessment 122.86 122.86 129.00 135.45 c. # of Parcels 85 85 85 85 d. Total Amount Assessed for the District: 10,443 10,443 10,965 11,513 Income
a. Annual Assessment Revenue 10,481 10,528 10,965 11,513 b. Minus County Tax Collection Fee (1.7%) (178) (178) (186) (196) c. Other (624) 297 306 315 d. Total Revenue: 9,680 10,647 11,084 11,632 Services
a. Utilities: Water 1,727 1,264 2,420 2,662 b. Utilities: PGE 140 121 124 149 c. Landscape Maintenance 1,620 3,000 8,000 8,240 d. One-Time Project/Maintenance - - 4,500 3,000 e. Property Owner Noticing 70 7 7 7 f. Annual Reporting 1,012 480 494 509 g. City Administration 2,060 2,122 2,185 2,251 h. Total Expenditures: 6,630 6,993 17,731 16,818 Account Balance
a. Beginning Account Balance 27,189 30,239 33,893 27,247 b. Net Change (Revenue - Expenditures) 3,050 3,654 (6,646) (5,186) c. Ending Account Balance: 30,239 33,893 27,247 22,061 City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 17 ends

Zone 3 (Prominence)
Tract No. 4007
Formed: June 23, 1992
Resolution Number: 92-174

FY 2025
Maximum Base Assessment Rate: $1,144.88
Assessment Amount per Parcel: $1,069.29
Number of Parcels: 155
Assessment Income: $165,739.95

FY 2025 Maximum Base Assessment

Maximum Base Assessment (highest rate that can be charged per parcel).

• Originally set when the zone was created in 1992.

• Increased from the previous year from $1,118.42 to $1,144.88 per parcel by CPI.

• Includes an annual inflation increase: Yes, includes the February CPI -U for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward MSA ( 2.36% for the period February 202 3 to February 2024).

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 18 ends

FY 2025 Assessment and Income
FY 2025 Services
Services provided to this assessment zone include:
• Landscaping and irrigation: Include approximately one mile of landscaped frontage along Hayward Blvd. and Fairview Ave., with significant slope areas along the street;

• Surface maintenance of the sound wall (street side): of a mile-long masonry wall along Hayward Blvd. and Fairview Ave. This maintenance includes painting, cleaning, graffiti removal, and minor surface repair; and

• Maintenance of several open space areas: many are maintained within the tract; however, there are no funds budgeted for maintenance of the non -irrigated, non - landscaped open space areas.

• One-time projects: A budget of $104,000 is included for additional maintenance, as required.

Note: the ownership and responsibility of the masonry wall as a structure remains with the individual property owners.

Assessment Rate (annual charge per parcel) and Income

• The per parcel charge will increase from the previous year from $ 1,008.76 to $1,069.29.

• The total annual assessment income will equal $165,739.

• The recommended assessment rate will generate revenues that are adequate to pay for the expected level of maintenance and to maintain a prudent capital reserve balance.

• Each of the parcels shall be apportioned an equal share of the total assessment for this zone as the special benefit derived by an individual parcel is indistinguishable from each other.

• The current assessment rate is below the Maximum Base Assessment and is sufficient for maintaining levels of service and for keeping a prudent capital reserve balance.

• In future years, if there is a need for additional funds, the assessment may be increased up to the Maximum Base Assessment Rate.

• Can be increased later: Future increases above the Maximum Base Assessment would require the noticing and balloting of property owners per the requirements of Proposition 218.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 19 ends

Notes:
• In FY 2004, a group of property owners within Zone 3 formed a Landscape Committee. • In FY 2006, a Proposition 218 Election was held to increase the base assessment amount from $328.82 to $1,023.56 per parcel for the first three years to fund the cost of a comprehensive landscape plan (capital plan). The $694.74 increase was made up of two parts. One, an increase of $365.70 per year for maintenance; and two, an increase of $329.04 per year for capital. The three -year capital plan included 1) Bus Stop and Open Area Across Street on Fox Hollow Drive; 2) Open Area South of 28525 Fox Hollow Drive; 3) Hayward Blvd., Fairview Drive, and Barn Rock Drive.
• In FY 2009, the rate returned to $694.52 per year, which may be increased each year by inflation
City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 20 ends

City of Hayward
Landscape and Lighting District Zone 3 - Prominence
Fund 268, Project 3742
Established 1992, 155 Parcels
FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025
Budget Detail Actual Actual Estimated Proposed
Assessment
a. Maximum Base Assessment Amount 1,062.12 1,062.12 1,118.42 1,144.88 b. Annual Per Parcel Assessment 923.95 951.66 1,008.76 1,069.29 c. # of Parcels 155 155 155 155 d. Total Amount Assessed for the District: 143,212 147,507 156,358 165,740 Income
a. Annual Assessment Revenue 142,694 143,732 156,358 165,740 b. Minus County Tax Collection Fee (1.7%) (2,435) (2,508) (2,658) (2,818) c. Other (7,573) 8,913 9,180 9,456 d. Total Revenue: 132,686 150,138 162,880 172,378 Services
a. Utilities: Water 16,200 28,805 35,200 36,256 b. Utilities: PGE 2,032 1,909 2,200 2,266 c. Landscape Maintenance 57,800 76,209 99,554 102,541 d. One-Time Project/Maintenance 11,734 20,636 100,000 104,000 e. Planting 5,788 5,000
f. Tree Maintenance/Replacement 10,000 5,000 g. Bus Stop Area - - 5,000 h. Irrigation/V-Ditch Filter - 10,000 10,000 i. Property Owner Noticing 125 12 13 13 j. Annual Reporting 1,163 552 568 585 k. City Administration 4,326 4,456 4,589 4,727 l. Total Expenditures: 109,167 132,579 252,124 275,388 Account Balance
a. Beginning Account Balance 340,225 363,744 381,302 292,058 b. Net Change (Revenue - Expenditures) 23,520 17,558 (89,244) (103,010) c. Ending Account Balance: 363,744 381,302 292,058 189,048 City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 21 ends

Zone 4 (Stratford Village )
Tract Nos. 6472, 6560, 6682 & 6683
Formed: May 23, 1995
Resolution Number: 95-96
Annexed Tract No. 6682: January 23, 1996

FY 2025
Maximum Base Assessment Rate: $180.00
Assessment Amount per Parcel: $126.93
Number of Parcels: 174
Assessment Income: $22,085.82

FY 2025 Maximum Base Assessment

Maximum Base Assessment (highest rate that can be charged per parcel).

• Originally set when the zone was created in 1995.

• Is at the maximum, unchanged from the previous year at $180.00 per parcel.

• Includes an annual inflation increase: No

• Can be increased later: Future increases above the Maximum Base Assessment would require the noticing and balloting of property owners per the requirements of Proposition 218.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 22 ends

FY 2025 Assessment and Income
FY 2025 Services

Services provided to this assessment zone include:

• Landscaping and irrigation: Include approximately 21,000 square feet adjacent to the Ward Creek Bike Pathway, including an irrigation system with electrical controllers;

• Median landscaping: Includes approximately 2,100 square feet along Stratford Rd. and Ruus Lane;

• Landscaping: Includes approximately 7,500 square feet along Pacheco Way;

• Landscaping, irrigation, and appurtenances: on the median island on Ruus Lane;

• Surface maintenance of the street side of a masonry wall along Pacheco Way and along the southern and eastern property boundaries. This maintenance includes painting, cleaning, graffiti removal, and minor surface repair;

• Asphalt bike pathway : Includes approximately 2,100 linear feet adjacent to Ward Creek between Pacheco Way and Folsom Ave., and bike path striping on pathway;

• Chain link fencing : Includes approximately 50 linear feet of 4 -foot-high black vinyl clad fencing at two locations between Ward Creek and the asphalt pathway; Assessment Rate (annual charge per parcel) and Income

• The per parcel charge will increase from the previous year from $123.13 to $126.93.

• The total annual assessment income will equal $22,805.

• The recommended assessment rate will generate revenues that are adequate to pay for the expected level of maintenance and to maintain a prudent capital reserve balance.

• Each of the parcels shall be apportioned an equal share of the total assessment for this zone as the special benefit derived by an individual parcel is indistinguishable from each other.

• The current assessment rate is below the Maximum Base Assessment and is sufficient for maintaining levels of service and for keeping a prudent capital reserve balance.

• In future years, if there is a need for additional funds, the assessment may be increased up to the Maximum Base Assessment rate.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 23 ends

• Gate: Includes a 14-foot-wide entry gate structure, an 8-foot-wide swing gate, and a 12-foot-wide swing gate;

• Bridge: Includes 32 linear feet of 8 -foot-wide prefabricated steel bridge with wood deck; and

• Pedestrian access: Between Rosecliff Lane and Ward Creek Pathway.

• One-time maintenance: A budget of $6,000 is allocated for additional maintenance, as required.

Note: the ownership and responsibility of the masonry wall as a structure remains with the individual property owners.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 24 ends

City of Hayward
Landscape and Lighting District Zone 4 - Stratford Village Fund 269, Project 3743
Established 1995, 174 Parcels
FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025
Actual Actual Estimated Proposed
Assessment
a. Maximum Base Assessment Amount 180.00 180.00 180.00 180.00 b. Annual Per Parcel Assessment 116.16 116.16 123.23 126.93 c. # of Parcels 174 174 174 174 d. Total Amount Assessed for the District: 20,212 20,212 21,442 22,086 Income
a. Annual Assessment Revenue 20,434 20,177 21,442 22,086 b. Minus County Tax Collection Fee (1.7%) (344) (344) (365) (375) d. Other (2,139) 2,269 2,337 2,407 e. Total Revenue: 17,952 22,102 23,414 24,117 Services
a. Utilities: Water 33,475 (7,073) 11,000 12,100 b. Utilities: PGE 1,346 1,251 1,500 1,800 c. Landscape Maintenance 6,415 7,221 12,500 12,875 d. One-Time Project/Maintenance 5,660 191 17,000 6,000 e. Property Owner Noticing 24 7 7 7 f. Annual Reporting 460 480 494 509 g. City Administration 2,060 2,122 2,185 2,251 h. Total Expenditures: 49,441 4,199 44,687 35,542 Account Balance
a. Beginning Account Balance 111,242 79,753 97,656 76,384 b. Net Change (Revenue - Expenditures) (31,489) 17,903 (21,272) (11,425) c. Ending Account Balance: 79,753 97,656 76,384 64,959 City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 25 ends

Zone 5 (Soto Rd. & Plum Tree St.)
Tract Nos. 6641 & 6754
Formed: May 23, 1995
Resolution Number: 95-97
Annexed Tract No. 6754: October 17, 1995

FY 2025
Maximum Base Assessment Rate: $258.67
Assessment Amount per Parcel: $258.67
Number of Parcels: 38
Assessment Income: $9,829.46

FY 2025 Maximum Base Assessment

Maximum Base Assessment (highest rate that can be charged per parcel).

• Originally set when the zone was created in 1995.

• Is at the maximum, unchanged from the previous year at $258.67 per parcel.

• Includes an annual inflation increase : No

• Can be increased later: Future increases above the Maximum Base Assessment would require the noticing and balloting of property owners per the requirements of Proposition 218.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 26 ends

FY 2025 Assessment and Income
FY 2025 Services
Services provided to this assessment zone include:
• Landscaping: within the 10-foot-wide setback area between the masonry wall and the sidewalk (approximately 360 lineal feet);

• Landscaping and appurtenances: within the 5.5 -foot-wide planter strip between the sidewalk and the curb return areas across the frontage of Tract 6641; located within the 10 -foot-wide setback area between the masonry wall and the sidewalk (approximately 440 lineal feet); and within the 5.5-foot-wide planter strip between the sidewalk and the curb across the Soto Road frontage of Final Map Tract 6754.

• Surface maintenance of the masonry wall (street side): of a masonry wall along Soto Road. This maintenance includes painting, cleaning, graffiti removal, and minor surface repair; and

• The curb return areas: at the intersection of Soto Road and Plum Tree Street.

• One-time maintenance: A budget o f $2,500 is allocated for additional maintenance, as required.

Note: the ownership and responsibility of the masonry wall as a structure remains with the individual property owners.

Assessment Rate (annual charge per parcel) and Income

• The per parcel charge will remain the same as the previous year at $258.67.

• The total annual assessment income will equal $9,829.46.

• The recommended assessment rate will generate revenues that are adequate to pay for the expected level of maintenance and to maintain a prudent capital reserve balance.

• Each of the parcels shall be apportioned an equal share of the total assessment for this zone as the special benefit derived by an individual parcel is indistinguishable from each other.

• The current assessment rate is at the Maximum Base Assessment.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 27 ends

City of Hayward
Landscape and Lighting District Zone 5 - Plum Tree St. - Soto Road Fund 272, Project 3744
Established 1995, 38 Parcels
FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025
Budget Detail Actual Actual Estimated Proposed
Assessment
a. Maximum Base Assessment Amount: 258.67 258.67 258.67 258.67 b. Annual Per Parcel Assessment: 255.17 255.17 258.67 258.67 c. # of Parcels 38 38 38 38 d. Total Amount Assessed for the District: 9,696 9,696 9,829 9,829 Income
a. Annual Assessment Revenue 9,712 9,610 9,829 9,829 b. Minus County Tax Collection Fee (1.7%) (165) (165) (167) (167) c. Other (529) 631 631 631 d. Total Revenue: 9,018 10,076 10,294 10,294 Services
a. Utilities: Water 189 191 880 968 b. Utilities: PGE 291 266 300 360 c. Landscape Maintenance 1,620 2,370 5,000 5,150 d. One-Time Project/Maintenance - 3,077 5,000 2,500 e. Property Owner Noticing 31 3 3 127 f. Annual Reporting 511 240 247 637 g. City Administration 2,060 2,122 2,185 1,739 h. Total Expenditures: 4,703 8,268 13,616 11,481 Account Balance
a. Beginning Account Balance: 20,938 25,253 27,061 23,739 b. Net Change (Revenue - Expenditures) 4,315 1,808 (3,322) (1,187) c. Ending Account Balance: 25,253 27,061 23,739 22,552 City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 28 ends

Zone 6 (Peppertree Park)
Tract Nos. 4420 & 3337 (Lot 2)
Formed: May 11, 1982
Resolution Number: 82-160

FY 2025
Maximum Base Assessment Rate: $2.61 per linear foot
Assessment Amount per Parcel: $2.61 per linear foot
Number of Parcels: 11
Assessment Income: $13,034.34

FY 2025 Maximum Base Assessment

Maximum Base Assessment (highest rate that can be charged per parcel).

• Originally set when the zone was created in 1982.

• Is at the maximum, unchanged from the previous year at $2.61 per linear foot.

• Includes an annual inflation increase : No

• Can be increased later: Future increases above the Maximum Base Assessment would require the noticing and balloting of property owners per the requirements of Proposition 218.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 29 ends

FY 2025 Assessment and Income
FY 2025 Services
Services provided to this assessment zone include:

• Landscaping and decorative paving: within the median islands in San Clemente Street between Zephyr Avenue and San Antonio Street;

• Landscaping: in the fountain area; and

• Various: the identification sign, lighting, and landscaping in the main entrance median at San Clemente Street and San Antonio Street.

• One-time maintenance: A budget of $4,500 is allocated for additional maintenance, as required.

Assessment Rate (annual charge per parcel) and Income

• The per linear foot charge will remain the same from the previous year at $2.61.

• The total annual assessment income will equal $13,034.34.

• The recommended assessment rate will generate revenues that are adequate to pay for the expected level of maintenance and to maintain a prudent capital reserve balance.

• Each of the parcels shall be apportioned an equal share of the total assessment for this zone as the special benefit derived by an individual parcel is indistinguishable from each other.

• The current assessment rate is at the Maximum Base Assessment.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 30 ends

City of Hayward
Landscape and Lighting District Zone 6 - Peppertree Business Park Fund 273, Project 3730
Established 1982, 11 Parcels
FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025
Budget Detail Actual Actual Estimated Proposed
Assessment
a. Maximum Base Assessment Amount: 2.61 2.61 2.61 2.61 b. Annual Per Parcel Assessment: 2.61 2.61 2.61 2.61 c. # of Parcels 11 11 11 11 d. Length of Assessable Street Frontage 4,994 4,994 4,994 4,994 e. Total Amount Assessed for the District 13,034 13,034 13,034 13,034 Income
a. Annual Assessment Revenue 13,038 13,077 13,034 13,034 b. Minus County Tax Collection Fee (1.7%) (222) (222) (222) (222) c. Other (1,937) 2,393 375 375 d. Total Revenue: 10,880 15,249 13,188 13,188 Services
a. Utilities: Water 1,419 2,326 2,750 3,025 b. Utilities: PGE 129 110 200 240 c. Landscape Maintenance 1,050 1,222 1,258 1,296 d. One-Time Project/Maintenance - 4,500 4,500 e. Property Owner Noticing 7 1 1 1 f. Annual Reporting 1,012 480 494 509 g. City Administration 2,060 2,122 2,185 2,251 h. Total Expenditures: 5,678 6,260 11,389 11,822 Account Balance
a. Beginning Account Balance: 87,983 93,185 102,173 103,973 b. Net Change (Revenue - Expenditures) 5,202 8,989 1,799 1,366 c. Ending Account Balance: 93,185 102,173 103,973 105,339 City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 31 ends

Zone 7 (Twin Bridges)
Tract Nos. 7015
Formed: July 28, 1998
Resolution Number: 98-153

FY 2025
Maximum Base Assessment Rate: $1,197.48
Assessment Amount per Parcel: $664.83
Number of Parcels: 348
Assessment Income: $231,360.84

FY 2025 Maximum Base Assessment

Maximum Base Assessment (highest rate that can be charged per parcel).

• Originally set when the zone was created in 1998.

• Increased from the previous year from $1,169.82 to $1,197.48 per parcel by CPI.

• Includes an annual inflation increase: Yes , includes CPI-U for the San Francisco - Oakland-Hayward MSA 2.36% for the period February 2023 to February 2024).

• Can be increased later: Future increases above the Maximum Base Assessment would require the noticing and balloting of property owners per the requirements of Proposition 218.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 32 ends

FY 2025 Assessment and Income
FY 2025 Services

Services for this assessment zone include:
• Park: Includes a two-acre neighborhood park , maintained by the Hayward Area Recreation District through a Memorandum of Understanding with the City;

• Landscaping: Includes: planting, irrigation, the multi-use pathway, landscape lighting and other associated improvements located within the landscape easements and street right-of-way along Mission Boulevard and Industrial Parkway;

• Medians: Includes m edians and abutting landscaping along the Arrowhead Way entrance roads and traffic circles, including the bridge structure, signs, and decorative entry paving;

• Bus shelters;

• Walls and fences that face Mission Blvd., Industrial Parkway, the Arrowhead Way entrance roads, the golf course and along the Line N drainage channel (including graffiti removal);

• Specialty street lighting; and

• One-time maintenance: A budget of $407,000 is allocated for additional maintenance, as required.

Assessment Rate (annual charge per parcel) and Income
• The per parcel charge will increase from the previous year from $627.20 to $664.83.

• The total annual assessment income will equal $231,362.

• The recommended assessment rate will generate revenues that are adequate to pay for the expected level of maintenance and to maintain a prudent capital reserve balance.

• Each of the parcels shall be apportioned an equal share of the total assessment for this zone as the special benefit derived by an individual parcel is indistinguishable from each other.

• The current assessment rate is below the Maximum Base Assessment and is sufficient for maintaining levels of service and for keeping a prudent capital reserve balance.

• In future years, if there is a need for additional funds, the assessment may be increased up to the Maximum Base Assessment Rate.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 33 ends

City of Hayward
Landscape and Lighting District Zone 7 - Twin Bridges
Fund 274, Project 3746
Established 1998, 348 Parcels
FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025
Budget Detail Actual Actual Estimated Proposed
Assessment
a. Maximum Base Assessment Amount: 1,110.94 1,110.94 1,169.82 1,197.48 b. Annual Per Parcel Assessment: 591.70 591.70 627.20 664.83 c. # of Parcels 348 348 348 348 d. Total Amount Assessed for the District 205,912 205,912 218,266 231,361 Income
a. Annual Assessment Revenue 203,062 202,875 218,266 231,361 b. Minus County Tax Collection Fee (1.7%) (3,500) (3,500) (3,711) (3,933) c. Other (13,416) 16,744 2,500 3,000 d. Total Revenue: 186,146 216,118 217,056 230,428 Services
a. Utilities: Water 55,028 35,028 77,000 84,700 b. Utilities: PGE 1,287 1,063 2,000 2,400 c. Landscape Maintenance 34,864 36,000 37,080 38,192 d. Park Maintenance - HARD 47,528 35,646 51,000 52,530 e. Park Maintenance Utilities - HARD - - 33,000 f. One-Time Project/Maintenance - 4,935 177,000 407,000 g. Tree Maintenance/Replacement 4,929 40,000 10,000 h. Flags - - 800 - i. Property Owner Noticing 280 28 28 29 j. Annual Reporting 1,163 552 568 585 k. City Administration 4,326 4,456 4,589 4,727 l. Total Expenditures: 149,405 117,707 390,066 633,164 Account Balance
a. Beginning Account Balance: 600,246 636,987 735,398 562,388 b. Net Change (Revenue - Expenditures) 36,741 98,410 (173,010) (402,736) c. Ending Account Balance: 636,987 735,398 562,388 159,652 City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 34 ends

Zone 8 (Capitola Street)
Tract Nos. 7033
Formed: March 2, 1999
Resolution Number: 99-030

FY 2025
Maximum Base Assessment Rate: $856.44
Assessment Amount per Parcel: $205.68
Number of Parcels: 24
Assessment Income: $4,936.32

FY 2025 Maximum Base Assessment

Maximum Base Assessment (highest rate that can be charged per parcel).

• Originally set when the zone was created in 1999.

• Increased from the previous year from $836.64 to $856.44 per parcel by CPI.

• Includes an annual inflation increase: Yes, includes CPI -U for the San Francisco - Oakland-Hayward MSA 2.36% for the period February 2023 to February 2024).

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 35 ends

FY 2025 Assessment and Income
FY 2025 Services

Services for this assessment zone include:

• Landscaping: a 10 -foot-wide landscaped area, between the wall and the Hesperian Blvd. frontage, to be improved with landscaping, irrigation, and other associated improvements located within the landscaped area.

• Surface maintenance: of the 8 -foot-high decorative concrete wall along the tract's Hesperian Blvd. frontage. This maintenance includes painting, cleaning, graffiti removal, and minor surface repair; and

• One-time maintenance: A budget of $2,500 is allocated for additional maintenance as required.

Note: t he ownership and responsibility of the masonry wall as a structure remains with the individual property owners.

Assessment Rate (annual charge per parcel) and Income

• The per parcel charge will increase from the previous year from $195.89 to $205.68.

• The total annual assessment income will equal $4,936.

• The recommended assessment rate will generate revenues that are adequate to pay for the expected level of maintenance and to maintain a prudent capital reserve balance.

• Each of the parcels shall be apportioned an equal share of the total assessment for this zone as the special benefit derived by an individual parcel is indistinguishable from each other.

• The current assessment rate is below the Maximum Base Assessment and is sufficient for maintaining levels of service and for keeping a prudent capital reserve balance.

• In future years, if there is a need for additional funds, the assessment may be increased up to the Maximum Base Assessment Rate.

• Can be increased later: Future increases above the Maximum Base Assessment would require the noticing and balloting of property owners per the requirements of Proposition 218.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 36 ends

City of Hayward
Landscape and Lighting District Zone 8 - Capitola St.

Fund 275, Project 3748
Established 1999, 24 Parcels
FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025
Budget Detail Actual Actual Estimated Proposed
Assessment
a. Maximum Base Assessment Amount: 794.54 794.54 836.66 856.44 b. Annual Per Parcel Assessment: 186.56 186.56 195.89 205.68 c. # of Parcels 24 24 24 24 d. Total Amount Assessed for the District: 4,477 4,477 4,701 4,936 Income
a. Annual Assessment Revenue 4,477 4,488 4,701 4,936
b. Minus County Tax Collection Fee (1.7%) (76) (76) (80) (84) c. Other (1,184) 1,348 400 400 d. Total Revenue: 3,218 5,760 5,021 5,252 Services
a. Utilities: Water 405 738 550 605 b. Landscape Maintenance 1,225 1,166 4,000 4,000 c. One-Time Project/Maintenance - 1,971 4,500 2,500 d. Property Owner Noticing 20 2 2 81 e. Annual Reporting 511 240 247 858 f. City Administration 2,060 2,122 2,185 2,144 g. Total Expenditures: 4,221 6,239 11,484 10,188 Account Balance
a. Beginning Account Balance: 57,815 56,811 56,332 49,869 b. Net Change (Revenue - Expenditures) (1,003) (479) (6,463) (4,936) c. Ending Account Balance: 56,811 56,332 49,869 44,933 City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 37 ends

Zone 9 (Orchard Ave.)
Tract Nos. 7063
Formed: April 25, 2000
Resolution Number: 00-050

FY 2025
Maximum Base Assessment Rate: $228.66
Assessment Amount per Parcel: $38.41
Number of Parcels: 74
Assessment Income: $2,842.34

FY 2025 Maximum Base Assessment

Maximum Base Assessment (highest rate that can be charged per parcel).

• Originally set when the zone was created in 2000.

• Increased from the previous year from $223.38 to $228.66 per parcel by CPI.

• Includes an annual inflation increase: Yes, includes CPI -U for the San Francisco - Oakland-Hayward MSA (2.36% for the period February 2023 to February 2024).

• Can be increased later: Future increases above the Maximum Base Assessment would require the noticing and balloting of property owners per the requirements of Proposition 218.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 38 ends

FY 2025 Assessment and Income
FY 2025 Services

Services for this assessment zone include:

• Surface maintenance: of the 10-foot-high decorative concrete wall along the railroad and along the south property line abutting Lot 40. This maintenance includes painting, cleaning, graffiti removal, and minor surface repair. To minimize this maintenance work, Boston Ivy is planted and maintained along most of the surface of the wall.

• One-time maintenance: A budget of $500 is included for additional maintenance, as required.

Note: the ownership and responsibility of the masonry wall as a structure remains with the individual property owners.

Assessment Rate (annual charge per parcel) and Income

• The per parcel charge will increase from the previous year from $36.24 to $38.41.

• The total annual assessment income will equal $2,842.

• The recommended assessment rate will generate revenues that are adequate to pay for the expected level of maintenance and to maintain a prudent capital reserve balance.

• Each of the parcels shall be apportioned an equal share of the total assessment for this zone as the special benefit derived by an individual parcel is indistinguishable from each other.

• The current assessment rate is below the Maximum Base Assessment and is sufficient for maintaining levels of service and for keeping a prudent capital reserve balance.

• In future years, if there is a need for additional funds, the assessment may be increased up to the Maximum Base Assessment Rate.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 39 ends

City of Hayward
Landscape and Lighting District Zone 9 - Orchard Ave.

Fund 276, Project 3749
Established 2000, 74 Parcels
FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025
Budget Detail Actual Actual Estimated Proposed
Assessment
a. Maximum Base Assessment Amount: 212.14 212.14 223.38 228.66 b. Annual Per Parcel Assessment: 34.19 34.19 36.24 38.41 c. # of Parcels 74 74 74 74 d. Total Amount Assessed for the District 2,530 2,530 2,682 2,843 Income
a. Annual Assessment Revenue 2,513 2,555 2,682 2,843 b. Minus County Tax Collection Fee (1.7%) (43) (43) (46) (48) c. Other (200) 239 35 40 d. Total Revenue: 2,270 2,750 2,671 2,834 Services
a. One-Time Project/Maintenance 500 500
b. Graffiti Abatement 2,000 2,000
c. Property Owner Noticing 60 6 6 6 d. Annual Reporting 511 240 247 254 e. City Administration 1,236 1,273 1,311 1,351 f. Total Expenditures: 1,807 1,519 4,064 4,111 Account Balance
a. Beginning Account Balance: 8,837 9,301 10,532 9,139 b. Net Change (Revenue - Expenditures) 463 1,232 (1,393) (1,277) c. Ending Account Balance: 9,301 10,532 9,139 7,862 City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 40 ends

Zone 10 (Eden Shores Residential)
Tract Nos. 7317, 7360 & 7361
Formed: June 24, 2003
Resolution Number: 03-083

FY 2025
Maximum Base Assessment Rate: $1,363.60
Assessment Amount per Parcel: $344.49
Number of Parcels: 534
Assessment Income: $183,957.66

FY 2025 Maximum Base Assessment

Maximum Base Assessment (highest rate that can be charged per parcel).

• Originally set when the zone was created in 2003.

• Increased from the previous year from $1,332.08 to $1,363.60 per parcel by CPI.

• Includes an annual inflation increase: Yes, includes CPI -U for the San Francisco - Oakland-Hayward MSA (2.36% for the period February 2023 to February 2024).

• Can be increased later: Future increases above the Maximum Base Assessment would require the noticing and balloting of property owners per the requirements of Proposition 218.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 41 ends

FY 2025 Assessment and Income
FY 2025 Services

The Eden Shores Homeowners Association (HOA) administers the landscape maintenance contract for the zone. The HOA invoices the City quarterly for reimbursement of expenses authorized thru the assessment zone budget. The City manages the park maintenance contract, through a Memorandum of Understanding with the Hayward Area Recreation District.

Services for this assessment zone include:
• Park: A 5.58- acre park within the development which includes landscaping and irrigation and playground equipment. The City of Hayward has a Memorandum of Understanding with the Hayward Area Recreation Department (HARD) to maintain the park;
• Landscaping and irrigation : of medians, park strips, and parkway within the development; and
• Surface maintenance: of the decorative concrete and masonry walls along the perimeter and within the tract. This maintenance includes painting, cleaning, graffiti removal, and minor surface repair.
• One-time maintenance: A budget of 500,000 is allocated for additional maintenance, as required.

Note: the ownership and responsibility of the masonry wall as a structure remains with the individual property owners.

Assessment Rate (annual charge per parcel) and Income

• The per parcel charge will increase from the previous year from $316.05 to $344.49.

• The total annual assessment income will equal $183,960.

• The recommended assessment rate will generate revenues that are adequate to pay for the expected level of maintenance and to maintain a prudent capital reserve balance.

• Each of the parcels shall be apportioned an equal share of the total assessment for this zone as the special benefit derived by an individual parcel is indistinguishable from each other.

• The current assessment rate is below the Maximum Base Assessment and is sufficient for maintaining levels of service and for keeping a prudent capital reserve balance.

• In future years, if there is a need for additional funds, the assessment may be increased up to the Maximum Base Assessment Rate.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 42 ends

City of Hayward
Landscape and Lighting District Zone 10 - Eden Shores
Fund 277, Project 3750
Established 2003, 534 Parcels
FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025
Budget Detail Actual Actual Estimated Proposed
Assessment
a. Maximum Base Assessment Amount: 1,265.04 1,265.04 1,332.08 1,363.60 b. Annual Per Parcel Assessment: 278.94 287.32 316.05 344.49 c. # of Parcels 534 534 534 534 d. Total Amount Assessed for the District: 148,954 153,429 168,771 183,958 Income
a. Annual Assessment Revenue 149,511 153,708 168,771 183,958 b. Minus County Tax Collection Fee (1.7%) (2,532) (2,608) (2,869) (3,127) c. Other (10,281) 12,089 2,600 2,800 d. Total Revenue: 136,697 163,189 168,502 183,630 Services
a. Utilities: Water 20,433 16,141 33,000 36,300 b. Utilities: PGE 395 338 500 600 c. Landscape Maintenance - ES HOA 35,380 30,680 31,600 32,548 d. Park Maintenance - HARD 75,536 56,652 56,652 58,352 e. Park Maintenance Utilities - HARD 45,000
f. One-Time Project/Maintenance 4,765 500,000 g. Graffiti Abatement - 6,000 6,180 h. Property Owner Noticing 218 21 22 23 i. Annual Reporting 1,163 552 568 585 j. City Administration 4,326 4,456 4,589 4,727 k. Total Expenditures: 137,450 113,604 132,932 684,315 Account Balance
a. Beginning Account Balance: 472,453 471,700 521,285 556,854 b. Net Change (Revenue - Expenditures) (753) 49,585 35,570 (500,685) c. Ending Account Balance: 471,700 521,285 556,854 56,170 City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 43 ends

Zone 11 ( Stonebrae Country Club)
Tract Nos. 5354, 8356
Formed: July 18, 2006
Resolution Number: 06-096

FY 2025
Maximum Base Assessment Rate: $1,934.08
Assessment Amount per Parcel (Developed): $408.18
Assessment Amount per Parcel (Future Development): $216.34 Number of Parcels: 644
Assessment Income: $260,182.10

Note: Ten new parcels were added in FY 2022. Fourteen parcels of the Stonebrae Country Club development are scheduled for future development. Future development parcels are assessed at 53% of the developed parcel rate.

FY 2025 Maximum Base Assessment

Maximum Base Assessment (highest rate that can be charged per parcel).

• Originally set when the zone was created in 2006.

• Increased from the previous year from $1,889.38 to $1,934.08 per parcel by CPI.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 44 ends

• Includes an annual inflation increase: Yes, includes CPI-U for the San Francisco - Oakland-Hayward MSA (2.36% for the period February 2023 to February 2024).

• Can be increased later: Future increases above the Maximum Base Assessment would require the noticing and balloting of property owners per the requirements of Proposition 218.

FY 2025 Assessment and Income

Assessment Rate (annual charge per parcel) and Income

• The annual assessment rate is recommended to be increased based on the City’s analysis of the financial stability of the zone.

• The per parcel charge for Developed parcels will increase from the previous year from $374.48 to $408.18.

• The per parcel charge for Future Developed parcels will increase from the previous year from $198.47 to $216.34.

• In FY 2017, the assessment rate was reduced 58% from $379 to $156, as expenses were stable, and the account balance was healthy. However, since that time, expenses have increased, to include water, general maintenance, and ongoing upkeep of the district.

The increase in costs, along with use of the account balance has necessitated the need to increase rates annually since the initial decrease in FY 2017.

• The total annual assessment income will equal $260,184.

• The recommended assessment rate will generate revenues that are adequate to pay for the expected level of maintenance and to maintain a prudent capital reserve balance.

• Each of the parcels shall be apportioned an equal share of the total assessment for this zone as the special benefit derived by an individual parcel is indistinguishable from each other.

• The current assessment rate is below the Maximum Base Assessment and is sufficient for maintaining levels of service and for keeping a prudent capital reserve balance.

• In future years, if there is a need for additional funds, the assessment may be increased up to the Maximum Base Assessment Rate.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 45 ends

FY 2025 Services
The Stonebrae Homeowners Association (HOA) administers the landscape maintenance contract for the zone. The HOA invoices the City quarterly for reimbursement of expenses authorized in the benefit district zone budget.

Services for this assessment zone include:

• Landscaping and irrigation: of median, park strips, parkway improvements, and multi- use pathway improvements along Fairview Ave., Carden Lane, Hayward Blvd., Stonebrae Country Club Dr., and the access road to the City water tank;

• Slope maintenance: along Carden Lane, Fairview Ave., Hayward Blvd., and Stone Country Club Dr.;

• Wall maintenance: of decorative walls facing Fairview Ave. and Hayward Blvd. but not including the view fence of the lots along Fairview Ave. This maintenance includes painting, cleaning, graffiti removal, and replacement of the improvements if needed;

• Street and landscape lighting: along Fairview Ave., Carden Lane, Hayward Blvd.; and along the frontage of the school at the intersection of Hayward Blvd ./Stonebrae Country;

• Club Drive and Carden Lane : this maintenance includes electrical costs, and replacement of the improvements if needed;

• One-time maintenance: T he following improvements are planned: 1) Installation of weather-based irrigation controllers to better schedule and monitor water usage. 2) Annual tree fertilization and tree trimming. 3) Annual replenishment of mulch.

Note: The Stonebrae Project is proposed to be developed in multiple phases (Villages A-E).

Pursuant to the original 2002 Vesting Tentative Map for Stonebrae , Village C was anticipated to have 71 single-family lots. On July 5, 2017, the Final Map for Village C was recorded, which updated the number of single -family lots to 96. It should be noted that the Stonebrae development was originally approved for 650 total units. A total of 538 lots have been previously created. With the addition of the 96 Village C lots and the existing 538 lots in the other Villages, the total number of lots increased to 634. On October 6, 2020 , City Council approved a Final Map of Tract 8518, subdividing a 20 -acre site into 10 single family lots, increasing the total number of lots to 644. The current development phase consists of 6 30 single-family parcels (increased from 617 in FY 202 2). The future development phases will consist of the remaining 13 single-family parcels (decreased from 15 in FY 2023).

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 46 ends

City of Hayward
Landscape and Lighting District Zone 11 - Stonebrae Country Club Fund 279, Project 3731
Established 2006, 644 Parcels (10 Parcels added in 2021) FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025
Budget Detail Actual Actual Estimated Proposed
Assessment
a. Maximum Base Assessment Amount: 1,705.76 1,794.28 1,889.38 1,934.08 Developed Parcels
b. Annual Per Parcel Assessment: 330.52 340.44 374.48 408.18 c. # of Parcels 617 629 630 630 d. Total Amount Assessed: 203,931 214,137 235,922 257,153 Future Development Parcels - 53%
e. Annual Per Parcel Assessment 175.18 180.43 198.47 216.34 f. # of Parcels 27 15 14 14 g. Total Amount Assessed: 4,730 2,706 2,779 3,029 h. Total Amount Assessed for the District: 208,661 216,843 238,701 260,182 Income
a. Annual Assessment Revenue 208,661 249,592 238,701 260,182 b. Minus County Tax Collection Fee (1.7%) (3,547) (36,863) (4,058) (4,423) c. Other 9,699 10,411 3,500 3,500 d. Total Revenue: 214,813 223,140 238,143 259,259 Services
a. Utilities: Water 104,497 110,000 121,000 133,100 b. Utilities: PGE 12,392 9,064 9,336 11,203 c. Landscape Maintenance 74,194 54,862 56,508 58,203 d. One-Time Project/Maintenance 2,577 67,996 72,500 74,675 e. Property Owner Noticing 512 51 52 54 f. Annual Reporting 1,012 480 494 509 g. City Administration 3,090 3,183 3,278 3,377 h. Total Expenditures: 198,275 245,635 263,168 281,120 Account Balance
a. Beginning Account Balance: 447,654 443,691 421,196 396,171 b. Net Change (Revenue - Expenditures) 16,538 (22,495) (25,025) (21,861) c. Ending Account Balance: 443,691 421,196 396,171 374,309 City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 47 ends

Zone 12 ( Spindrift - Eden Shore East)
Tract Nos. 7489, 7708 & 8148
Formed: May 15, 2007
Annexed Tract No. 8148: June 21, 2016
Resolution Number: 07-031 & 16-065

FY 2025
Maximum Base Assessment Rate: $256.28
Assessment Amount per Parcel: $104.16
Number of Parcels: 379
Assessment Income: $39,476.64

Annexation to Zone 12 – Spindrift at Eden Shores (Tract 8148) On June 21, 2016, the City Council approved the annexation of the Spindrift at Eden Shores Project into existing Zone 12 of LLAD 96 -1. A total of 118 new lots were created and added to existing Zone 12. The new additions to Zone 12 will be assessed in a manner similar to the existing 261 lots in Zone 12 once developed, which currently pay for the maintenance of improvements at the Alden E. Oliver Sports Park.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 48 ends

FY 2025 Maximum Base Assessment

Maximum Base Assessment (highest rate that can be charged per parcel).

Eden Shores East:
• Originally set when the zone was created in 2007.

• Increased from the previous year from $250.34 to $256.28 per parcel by CPI.

• Includes an annual inflation increase: Yes, includes CPI -U for the San Francisco - Oakland-Hayward MSA, (2.36% for the period February 2023 to February 2024).

• Can be increased later: Future increases above the Maximum Base Assessment would require the noticing and balloting of property owners per the requirements of Proposition 218.

Spindrift Annexation:
• Originally set when the zone was created in 2016.

• Increased from the previous year from $239.80 to $246.98 per parcel by CPI.

• Includes an annual inflation increase: Yes, includes CPI -U for the San Francisco - Oakland-Hayward MSA, (2.62% for the period December 2022 to December 2023) and the unused CPI carried over from previous fiscal years is 3.53%. Therefore, the Maximum Base Assessment Rate has been increased by 3.00%.

• Can be increased later: Future increases above the Maximum Base Assessment would require the noticing and balloting of property owners per the requirements of Proposition 218.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 49 ends

FY 2025 Assessment and Income

FY 2025 Services

Services for this assessment zone include:

Minor Portion of Sports Park: The City of Hayward has an agreement with the Hayward Area Recreation and Park District (HARD) to maintain the Alden E. Oliver Sports Park which benefits parcels within this benefit zone. The annual assessment pays for a minor portion of the Sports Park maintenance expense and City administrative costs associated with managing the benefit assessment program for this benefit zone. Maintenance of the neighborhood serving features of the Alden E. Oliver Sports Park include picnic tables, basketball courts, barbeque areas, soccer fields, etc. HARD is responsible for capital replacement of the park’s capital items.

Assessment Rate (annual charge per parcel) and Income

• The annual assessment rate is recommended to be increased based on the City’s analysis of the financial stability of the zone.

• The per parcel charge for Developed parcels will increase from the previous year from $98.26 to $104.16.

• The total annual assessment income will equal $39,476.

• The recommended assessment rate will generate revenues that are adequate to pay for the expected level of maintenance and to maintain a prudent capital reserve balance.

• Each of the parcels shall be apportioned an equal share of the total assessment for this zone as the special benefit derived by an individual parcel is indistinguishable from each other.

• The current assessment rate is below the Maximum Base Assessment and is sufficient for maintaining levels of service and for keeping a prudent capital reserve balance.

• In future years, if there is a need for additional funds, the assessment may be increased up to the Maximum Base Assessment Rate.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 50 ends

City of Hayward
Landscape and Lighting District Zone 12 - Spindrift (Eden Shores East) Fund 278, Project 3732
Established 2007, 2016; 379 Parcels
FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025
Budget Detail Actual Actual Estimated Proposed
Assessment
Original Zone, Established 2007, 261 parcels - CPI - Feb to Feb a. Maximum Base Assessment Amount: 226.02 237.74 250.34 256.28 b. Annual Per Parcel Assessment: 90.00 92.70 98.26 104.16 c. # of Parcels 261 261 261 261 d. Total Amount Assessed: 23,490 24,195 25,646 27,186 Spindrift Annexation, Added FY 2017, 118 Parcels - CPI Dec to Dec e. Maximum Base Assessment 226.03 232.80 239.80 246.98 f. Annual Per Parcel Assessment: 90.00 92.70 98.26 104.16 g. # of Parcels 118 118 118 118 h. Total Amount Assessed: 10,620 10,939 11,595 12,291 l. Total Amount Assessed for the District: 34,110 35,133 37,241 39,477 Income
a. Annual Assessment Revenue 34,110 35,088 37,241 39,477 b. Minus County Tax Collection Fee (1.7%) (580) (597) (633) (671) c. Other 603 581 150 150 d. Total Revenue: 34,133 35,071 36,758 38,956 Services
a. Contribution to Park Maintenance 32,888 24,666 24,666 25,406 b. Property Owner Noticing 346 30 31 32 c. Annual Reporting 1,163 552 568 585 d. City Administration 1,236 1,273 1,311 1,351 e. Total Expenditures: 35,632 26,521 26,577 27,374 Account Balance
a. Beginning Account Balance: 21,335 19,273 27,823 38,004 b. Net Change (Revenue - Expenditures) (1,499) 8,550 10,181 11,582 c. Ending Account Balance: 19,273 27,823 38,004 49,586 City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 51 ends

Zone 13 (Cannery Place)
Tract Nos. 7613, 7625, 7748 & 7749
Formed: June 17, 2008
Resolution Number: 08-0901

FY 2025
Maximum Base Assessment Rate: $1,454.34
Assessment Amount per Parcel: $417.78
582 Condominium Style Units, 16 Duets, and One Commercial Retail Parcel Assessment Income: $250,250.22

FY 2025 Maximum Base Assessment

Maximum Base Assessment (highest rate that can be charged per parcel).

• Originally set when the zone was created in 2008.

• Increased from the previous year from $1,420.74 to $1,454.34 per parcel by CPI.

• Includes an annual inflation increase: Yes, includes CPI-U for the San Francisco - Oakland-Hayward MSA (2.36% for the period February 2023 to February 2024).

• Can be increased later: Future increases above the Maximum Base Assessment would require the noticing and balloting of property owners per the requirements of Proposition 218.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 52 ends

FY 2025 Assessment and Income

FY 2025 Services
Services for this assessment zone include:
• Park Maintenance: includes approximately five (5) acres of park area encompassing landscaping and irrigation, and playground equipment, and maintenance of a historic water tower within the development;

• Landscaping and irrigation: includes park strips and parkway within the development;

• Surface maintenance: of the decorative concrete walls within the tract. This maintenance includes painting, cleaning, graffiti removal, and minor surface repair; and

• Maintenance: of street trees;

• Maintenance: of paved walkways;

• One-time maintenance: A budget of $120,000 is allocated for additional maintenance, as required.

Note: t he ownership and responsibility of the masonry wall as a structure remains with the individual property owners.

Assessment Rate (annual charge per parcel) and Income

• The per parcel charge for Developed parcels will increase from the previous year from $394.13 to $417.78.

• The total annual assessment income will equal $250,248.

• The recommended assessment rate will generate revenues that are adequate to pay for the expected level of maintenance and to maintain a prudent capital reserve balance.

• Each of the parcels shall be apportioned an equal share of the total assessment for this zone as the special benefit derived by an individual parcel is indistinguishable from each other.

• The current assessment rate is below the Maximum Base Assessment and is sufficient for maintaining levels of service and for keeping a prudent capital reserve balance.

• In future years, if there is a need for additional funds, the assessment may be increased up to the Maximum Base Assessment Rate.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 53 ends

City of Hayward
Landscape and Lighting District Zone 13 - Cannery Place Fund 281, Project 3733
Established 2008, 599 Parcels
FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025
Budget Detail Actual Actual Estimated Proposed
Assessment
a. Maximum Base Assessment Amount: 1,282.66 1,349.23 1,420.74 1,454.34 b. Annual Per Parcel Assessment: 361.00 371.82 394.13 417.78 c. # of Parcels 599 599 599 599 d. Total Amount Assessed for the District: 216,239 222,720.18 236,083 250,250 Income
a. Annual Assessment Revenue 215,622 223,234 236,083 250,250 b. Minus County Tax Collection Fee (1.7%) (3,676) (3,786) (4,013) (4,254) c. Other (13,544) 16,509 2,400 2,500 d. Total Revenue: 198,402 235,957 234,470 248,496 Services
a. Utilities: Water 61,555 47,389 80,000 88,000 b. Utilities: PGE 8,829 8,831 9,500 11,400 c. Landscape Maintenance 73,440 67,320 69,340 71,420 e. Graffiti Abatement - - 7,000 7,210 f. One Time Project/Maintenance 8,522 6,796 125,000 120,000 g. Calsense Air Time - Five Year Maint 25,000
h. Property Owner Noticing 448 48 50 51 i. Annual Reporting 1,012 480 494 509 j. City Administration 4,326 4,456 4,589 4,727 k. Total Expenditures: 158,132 135,320 320,973 303,317 Account Balance
a. Beginning Account Balance: 609,843 650,112 750,749 664,247 b. Net Change (Revenue - Expenditures) 40,270 100,637 (86,503) (54,821) c. Ending Account Balance: 650,112 750,749 664,247 609,426 City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 54 ends

Zone 14 (La Vista)
Tract Nos. 7620
Formed: June 14, 2016
Resolution Number: 16-044

FY 2025
Maximum Base Assessment Rate: $747.04
Assessment Amount per Developed Parcel: $683.65
Number of Parcels: 179
Assessment Income: $122,373.35

FY 2025 Maximum Base Assessment

Maximum Base Assessment (highest rate that can be charged per parcel).

• Originally set when the zone was created in 2016.

• Increased from the previous year from $725.28 to $747.04 per parcel by CPI-U.

• Includes an annual inflation increase: Yes, includes CPI -U for the San Francisco - Oakland-Hayward MSA, (2.62% for the period December 2022 to December 2023) and the unused CPI carried over from previous fiscal years is 3.53%. Therefore, the Maximum Base Assessment Rate has been increased by 3.00%.

• Can be increased later: Future increases above the Maximum Base Assessment would require the noticing and balloting of property owners per the requirements of Proposition 218.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 55 ends

FY 2025 Assessment and Income

FY 2025 Services

Services for this assessment zone include:

• Landscaping and irrigation: of the public right of ways of Tennyson Rd., Vista Grande Dr., Cantera Dr., Mountain View Dr., Fortuna Way, and Alquire Pkwy, and firebreak landscaping along the perimeter of the backside of the development. Such landscaping consists of the care for groundcover, shrubs, trees, weed abatement in planted areas, upkeep and servicing of the irrigation system, and utility costs to service the landscaping;

• Surface maintenance : of the decorative concrete walls within the tract. This maintenance includes painting, cleaning, graffiti removal, and minor surface repair;

• Maintenance: of street trees;

• Maintenance: of bioswales and tree filters;

• Maintenance: of street lighting;

• Maintenance: of private paved trails east of Alquire Parkway.

Assessment Rate (annual charge per parcel) and Income

• The per parcel charge will remain the same as the previous year at $683.65.

• The total annual assessment income will equal $122,373.

• The recommended assessment rate will generate revenues that are adequate to pay for the expected level of maintenance and to maintain a prudent capital reserve balance.

• Each of the parcels shall be apportioned an equal share of the total assessment for this zone as the special benefit derived by an individual parcel is indistinguishable from each other.

• The current assessment rate is below the Maximum Base Assessment and is sufficient for maintaining levels of service and for keeping a prudent capital reserve balance.

• In future years, if there is a need for additional funds, the assessment may be increased up to the Maximum Base Assessment Rate.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 56 ends

City of Hayward
Landscape and Lighting District Zone 14 - La Vista
Fund 282, Project 3751
Established 2016, 179 Parcels
FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025
Budget Detail Actual Actual Estimated Proposed
Assessment
a. Maximum Base Assessment Amount: 683.65 704.16 725.28 747.04 b. Annual Per Parcel Assessment: 683.65 683.65 683.65 683.65 c. # of Parcels 179 179 179 179 h. Total Amount Assessed for the District: 122,373 122,373 122,373 122,373 Income
a. Annual Assessment Revenue 122,967 121,977 122,373 122,373 b. Minus County Tax Collection Fee (1.7%) (2,080) (2,080) (2,080) (2,080) c. Other (4,813) 5,973 350 350 d. Total Revenue: 116,074 125,870 122,373 122,373 Services
a. Utilities: Water 32,406 19,444 21,388 23,527 b. Utilities: PGE 456 2,500 3,500 c. Landscape Maintenance 42,240 46,080 47,462 48,886 d. One-Time Capital Project/Maintenance - 14,620 45,000 59,440 e. Property Owner Noticing 147 14 15 15 f. Consultant/Annual Reporting 1,012 480 494 509 g. City Administration 4,326 4,456 4,589 4,727 h. Total Expenditures: 80,131 85,551 121,449 140,605 Account Balance
a. Beginning Account Balance: 191,036 227,744 268,063 268,988 b. Net Change (Revenue - Expenditures) 44,975 40,319 924 (18,231) c. Ending Account Balance: 227,744 268,063 268,988 250,756

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 57 ends

Zone 15 (Cadence)
Tract No. 8032
Formed: January 17, 2017
Resolution Number: 17-001

FY 2025
Maximum Base Assessment Rate: $724.44
Assessment Amount per Parcel: $0.00
Number of Parcels: 206
Assessment Income: $0.00

This benefit zone is s elf-maintained by the property owner. If the park is maintained, n o assessment amount will be charged.

FY 2025 Maximum Base Assessment

Maximum Base Assessment (highest rate that can be charged per parcel).

• Originally set when the zone was created in 2017.

• Increased from the previous year from $703.34 to $724.44 per parcel by CPI-U.

• Includes an annual inflation increase: Yes, includes CPI -U for the San Francisco - Oakland-Hayward MSA, (2.62% for the period December 2022 to December 2023) and the unused CPI carried over from previous fiscal years is 3.12%. Therefore, the Maximum Base Assessment Rate has been increased by 3.00%.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 58 ends

FY 2025 Assessment and Income
Assessment Rate (annual charge per parcel) and Income

• The annual assessment rate is recommended to remain the same based on the City’s analysis of the financial stability of the zone.

• The per parcel charge will remain the same at zero. AMCAL has entered in contract with Bella Vista Landscape Services, Inc. (CCL # 805462) to maintain the Park in good repair and working order, and in a neat, clean, and orderly condition. AMCAL is responsible for the annual payment of the District Management cost and reimbursement to the City for the Engineer’s Report. Thus, each of the 206 parcels will be assessed at $0.00 per parcel. The Assessment District ensures adequate funding is available for the maintenance of the Park should the Developer default, not meet the maintenance standards, or if the property is sold, and the City assumes maintenance of the park

• The total annual assessment income will equal zero pursuant to the Owners Participation Agreement (OPA) for the Cadence Development . Per the OPA , AMCAL Hayward LLC (AMCAL) is responsible for the maintenance Cadence Public Park in perpetuity or for the life of the agreement. As required in Section 8.12 of the OPA, AMCAL submitted their annual Park Maintenance Plan to the City for review and approval.

• The current assessment rate is below the Maximum Base Assessment and is sufficient for maintaining levels of service and for keeping a prudent capital reserve balance.

• In future years, if there is a need for additional funds, the assessment may be increased up to the Maximum Base Assessment Rate.

• Future increases above the Maximum Base Assessment would require the noticing and balloting of property owners per the requirements of Proposition 218.

FY 2025 Services

Services provided to this assessment zone include:

• Maintenance: of the Park in good repair and working order; and in a neat, clean, and orderly condition.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 59 ends

Zone 16 (Blackstone )
Tract Nos. 7894
Formed: May 17, 2016
Resolution Number: 16-044

FY 2025
Maximum Base Assessment Rate: Zone A: $516.66, Zone B: $542.48 Assessment Amount per Parcel – Zone A: $516.66, Zone B: $542.48 Number of Parcels: 157
Assessment Income: $81,735.30

FY 2025 Maximum Base Assessment

Maximum Base Assessment (highest rate that can be charged per parcel).

• Originally set when the zone was created in 2016.

• Zone A: Increased from the previous year from $501.60 to $516.66 per parcel by CPI.

• Zone B: Increased from the previous year from $526.68 to $542.48 per parcel by CPI.

• Includes an annual inflation increase: Yes, includes CPI -U for the San Francisco - Oakland-Hayward MSA, (2.62% for the period December 2022 to December 2023) and the unused CPI carried over from previous fiscal years is 1.65%. Therefore, the Maximum Base Assessment Rate has been increased by 3.00%.

• Can be increased later: Future increases above the Maximum Base Assessment would require the noticing and balloting of property owners per the requirements of Proposition 218.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 60 ends

FY 20 25 Assessment and Income

FY 2025 Services

Services provided to this assessment zone include:
• Landscaping and irrigation: of park strips and setback landscaping along frontages of Burbank Street and Palmer Avenue;

• Surface maintenance : of the decorative concrete walls within the tract. This maintenance includes painting, cleaning, graffiti removal, and minor surface repair;

• Park Maintenance : approximately two (2) acres of park area which includes landscaping and irrigation, exercise equipment, bocce ball courts, faux bridge, storm water basins and all other park amenities.

• Maintenance: of street trees, streetlights, paved walkways, and cobblestone pathways

• One-time maintenance: A budget of $43,707 is allocated for additional maintenance, as required.

• The per parcel rate (Zone A) will increase from the previous year from $ 501.60 to $516.66.

• The per parcel rate (Zone B) will increase from the previous year from $ 526.68 to $542.48.

• The total annual assessment income will equal $81,735.

• The recommended assessment rate will generate revenues that are adequate to pay for the expected level of maintenance and to maintain a prudent capital reserve balance.

• Each of the parcels shall be apportioned an equal share of the total assessment for this zone as the special benefit derived by an individual parcel is indistinguishable from each other.

• The current assessment rate is at the Maximum Base Assessment.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 61 ends

City of Hayward
Landscape and Lighting District Zone 16 - Blackstone
Fund 284, Project 3753
Established 2016, 157 Parcels
FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025
Budget Detail Actual Actual Estimated Proposed
Assessment
ZONE A
a. Maximum Base Assessment: 472.82 487.00 501.60 516.66 b. Annual Per Parcel Assessment: 467.96 482.00 501.60 516.66 c. # of Parcels 133 133 133 133 d. Total Amount Assessed: 62,239 64,106 66,713 68,716 ZONE B (5% of Zone A)
e. Maximum Base Assessment: 496.46 511.34 526.68 542.48 f. Annual Per Parcel Assessment: 491.34 506.08 526.68 542.48 g. # of Parcels 24 24 24 24 h. Total Amount Assessed: 11,792 12,146 12,640 13,020 i. Total Amount Assessed for the District: 74,031 76,252 79,353 81,735 Income
a. Annual Assessment Revenue 75,314 76,792 79,353 81,735 b. Minus County Tax Collection Fee (1.7%) (1,272) (1,310) (1,349) (1,390) c. Other (3,021) 3,752 100 125 d. Total Revenue: 71,021 79,234 78,104 80,471 Services
a. Utilities: Water 17,271 8,599 9,459 10,405 b. Utilities: PGE 2,698 2,727 2,809 3,370 c. Landscape Maintenance 22,000 24,000 24,720 25,462 d. One-Time Project/Maintenance 3,440 11,500 37,580 43,707 e. Property Owner Noticing 129 13 118 122 f. Annual Reporting 1,012 480 1,294 1,333 g. City Administration 3,090 3,183 3,278 3,377 h. Total Expenditures: 49,640 50,501 79,259 87,776 Account Balance
a. Beginning Account Balance 141,028 140,717 169,450 168,296 b. Net Change (Revenue - Expenditures) 26,141 28,733 (1,155) (7,305) c. Ending Account Balance: 140,717 169,450 168,296 160,990 City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 62 ends

Zone 17 (Parkside Heights)
Tract Nos. 8233
Formed: June 11, 2019
Resolution Number: 19-128

FY 2025
Maximum Base Assessment Rate: $608.86
Assessment Amount per Parcel (Developed): $582.88
Number of Parcels: 97
Assessment Income: $56,539.36

FY 2025 Maximum Base Assessment
Maximum Base Assessment (highest rate that can be charged per parcel).

• Originally set when the zone was created in 2019.

• Increased from the previous year from $594.78 to $608.86 per parcel by CPI.

• Includes an annual inflation increase: Yes, includes February CPI -U for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward MSA 2.36% for the period February 20 23 to February 2024).

• Can be increased later: Future increases above the Maximum Base Assessment would require the noticing and balloting of property owners per the requirements of Proposition 218.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 63 ends

FY 2025 Assessment and Income
FY 2025 Services

Assessment Rate (annual charge per parcel) and Income

• The annual assessment rate is recommended to remain the same based on the City’s analysis of the financial stability of the zone.

• The per parcel charge will increase from the previous year from $555.12 to $582.88.

• The total annual assessment income will equal $56,539.

• The recommended assessment rate will generate revenues that are adequate to pay for the expected level of maintenance and to maintain a prudent capital reserve balance.

• Each of the parcels shall be apportioned an equal share of the total assessment for this zone as the special benefit derived by an individual parcel is indistinguishable from each other.

• The current assessment rate is below the Maximum Base Assessment.

Services provided to this assessment zone include:

• Landscaping and irrigation: of groundcover, trees, and other landscaped areas along the public trail and undeveloped public open space along Ward Creek.

• Surface maintenance: This maintenance includes painting, cleaning, graffiti removal, and minor surface repair;

• Maintenance: of public trail trees;

• Maintenance: of trail signage;

• Maintenance: of paved public trail and permeable pavers;

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 64 ends

City of Hayward
Landscape and Lighting District Zone 17 - Parkside Heights Fund 290, Project 3754
Established 2019, 97 Parcels
FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025
Budget Detail Actual Actual Estimated Proposed
Assessment
a. Maximum Base Assessment Amount: 536.99 564.86 594.78 608.86 b. Developed Parcels
c. Annual Per Parcel Assessment: 528.69 528.69 555.12 582.88 d. # of Parcels 97 97 97 97 e. Total Amount Assessed for the District: 51,283 51,283 53,847 56,539 f. Total Amount Assessed 51,283 51,283 53,847 56,539.36 Income
a. Annual Assessment Revenue 51,756 51,323 53,847 56,539 b. Minus County Tax Collection Fee (1.7%) (872) (872) (915) (961) c. Other (1,688) 2,836 2,500 3,000 d. Total Revenue: 49,197 53,287 55,432 58,578 Services
a. Landscape Maintenance 45,000 46,350
b. One-Time Project Maintenance 4,500 2,500 c. Property Owner Noticing 75 8 8 8 d. Annual Reporting 1,012 480 494 509 e. City Administration 3,090 3,183 3,278 3,377 f. Total Expenditures: 4,178 3,670 53,280 52,744 Account Balance
a. Beginning Account Balance: 38,109 83,047 132,663 134,815 b. Net Change (Revenue - Expenditures) 45,019 49,617 2,151 5,835 c. Ending Account Balance: 83,047 132,663 134,815 140,649 City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 65 ends

Zone 18 (SoHay)
Tract Nos. 8428, 8444, 8445, 8446, 8447
Formed: June 11, 2019
Resolution Number: 19-130

FY 2025
Maximum Base Assessment Rate: Zone A: $464.38, Zone B: $441.16 Assessment Amount per SFE (Developed): Zone A: $300.00, Zone B: $285.00 Assessment Amount per SFE (Undeveloped): Zone A: $90.00 Zone B: $85.50 Number of Parcels: 433 SFE
Assessment Income: $127,320.00

FY 2025 Maximum Base Assessment

Maximum Base Assessment (highest rate that can be charged per parcel).

• Originally set when the zone was created in 2019.

• Zone A: Increased from the previous year from $453.66 to $464.38 per parcel by CPI.

• Zone B: Increased from the previous year from $430.98 to $441.16 per parcel by CPI.

• Includes an annual inflation increase: Yes , includes February CPI -U for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward MSA ( 2.36% for the period February 2023 to February 2024).
• Can be increased later: Future increases above the Maximum Base Assessment would require the noticing and balloting of property owners per the requirements of Proposition 218.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 66 ends

FY 2025 Assessment and Income

Assessment Rate (annual charge per parcel) and Income

• The rate per SFE (Zone A - Developed) will remain the same as the previous year at $300.00.

• The rate per SFE (Zone A - Undeveloped) will remain the same as the previous year at $90.00.

• The rate per SFE (Zone B - Developed) will remain the same as the previous year at $285.00.

• The rate per SFE (Zone B - Undeveloped) will remain the same as the previous year at $85.50.
• The total annual assessment income will equal $127,320.

• The recommended assessment rate will generate revenues that are adequate to pay for the expected level of maintenance and to maintain a prudent capital reserve balance.

• The assessments are apportioned among all lots and parcels within the Assessment Area based on Single -Family Equivalent (SFE). Townhomes are assigned 1.0 SFE, apartments are assigned 0.43 SFE per apartment unit, and commercial is assigned 0.50 SFE per 0.20 acres.

• The current assessment rate is below the Maximum Base Assessment and is sufficient for maintaining levels of service and for keeping a prudent capital reserve balance.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 67 ends

FY 2025 Services

Services provided to this assessment zone include:

• Landscaping and irrigation: of park groundcover, trees, and other landscaped areas;

• Surface maintenance: of the masonry walls within the tract. This maintenance includes painting, cleaning, graffiti removal, and minor surface repair;

• Park Maintenance : approximately two (2) acres of park area which includes landscaping and irrigation, play structures, basketball court, bike racks, fencing and all other park amenities. The City of Hayward has a Memorandum of Understanding with the Hayward Area Recreation Department (HARD) to maintain the park;

• Maintenance: of park lighting and signage;

• Maintenance: of concrete sidewalks and other paved or concrete surface within the park;

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 68 ends

City of Hayward
Landscape and Lighting District Zone 18 - SoHay
Fund 291, Project 3755
Established 2019, 433 SFE (Incl 2 Commercial parcels and 1 apt complex) FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025
Budget Detail Actual Actual Estimated Proposed
Assessment
Zone A
Maximum Base Assessment Amount: 409.57 430.82 453.66 464.38 a. Developed Parcels
b. Annual Assessment per SFE 50.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 c. # of SFE 192 261 261 261 d. Total Amount Assessed: 9,600 78,288 78,300 78,300 e. Future Development Parcels: 30%
f. Annual Assessment per SFE 15.00 90.00 90.00 90.00 g. # of SFE 69 - - - h. Total Amount Assessed: 1,035 - - - Zone B (95% of Zone A)
Maximum Base Assessment Amount: Zone B 389.09 409.28 430.98 441.16 k. Developed Parcels:
l. Annual Assessment per SFE 47.50 285.00 285.00 285.00 m. # of SFE 79 93 139 172 n. Total Amount Assessed: 3,752 26,505 39,615 49,020 o. Future Development Parcels: 30%
p. Annual Assessment per SFE 14.25 85.50 85.50 85.50 q. # of SFE 93 79 33 - r. Total Amount Assessed: 1,035 6,755 - - s. Total Amount Assessed for the District: 15,422 111,548 117,915 127,320 Income
a. Annual Assessment Revenue 15,422 111,847 117,915 127,320 b. Minus County Tax Collection Fee (1.7%) (262) (1,896) (2,005) (2,164) c. Other (2,621) 5,053 - - d. Total Revenue: 12,539 115,004 115,910 125,156 Services
a. Utilities: Water - 40,000
b. Utilities: PGE - 5,000
c. Park Maintenance - HARD 75,000 77,250 d. Park Maintenance Utilities - HARD 2,000
e. Other Repair/Maintenance 7,000 7,210 f. Property Owner Noticing 201 28 29 30 g. Annual Reporting 1,012 480 494 509 h. City Administration 1,600 1,648 1,697 1,748 i. Total Expenditures: 2,813 2,156 84,220 133,747 Account Balance
a. Beginning Account Balance: 121,572 129,940 242,788 274,478 b. Net Change (Revenue - Expenditures) 14,968 112,848 31,690 (8,591) c. Ending Account Balance: 129,940 242,788 274,478 265,887 City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 69 ends

Assessment
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hayward, County of Alameda, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Article XIIID of the California Constitution (collectively “the Act”), and in accordance with the Resolutio n of Intention, being Resolution No. 24-104, preliminarily approving the Engineer’s Report, as adopted by the City Council of the City of Hayward, on June 4, 2024.

WHEREAS, said Resolution directed the undersigned Engineer of Work to prepare and file a report presenting an estimate of costs, a diagram for the Assessment District, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the improvements upon all assessable parcels within the Assessment District, to which Resolution and the description of said proposed improvements therein contained, reference is hereby made for further particulars;
NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under said Act and the order of the City Council of the City of Hayward, hereby make the following assessments to cover the portion of the estimated cost of Improvements, and the costs and expenses incidental thereto to be paid by the Assessment District.

As required by the Act, an Assessment Diagram is hereto attached and made a part hereof showing the exterior boundaries of the Assessment District. The distinctive number of each parcel or lot of land in the Assessment District is its Assessor Parcel Numbe r appearing on the Assessment Roll.

I do hereby assess and apportion said net amount of the cost and expenses of the Improvements, including the costs and expenses incident thereto, upon the parcels and lots of land within said Assessment District, in accordance with the special benefits to be received by each parcel or lot from the improvements, and more particularly set forth in the Estimate of Costs and Method of Assessment hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof.

The assessments are made upon the parcels or lots of land within Assessment District, in proportion to the special benefits to be received by the parcels or lots of land, from the Improvements.

Each parcel or lot of land is described in the Assessment Roll by reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor's Maps of the County of Alameda for FY 2025. For a more particular description of said property, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on file and of record in the Alameda County Recorder Office.

I hereby place opposite the Assessor Parcel Number for each parcel or lot within the Assessment Roll, the amount of the assessment for the FY 2025 for each parcel or lot of land within said Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 96-1.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 70 ends

Dated: June 5, 2024

Engineer of Work

By
John W. Bliss, License No. C52091

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 71 ends

Vicinity Map

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 72 ends

Assessment Diagram
The boundary of the City of Hayward’s Landscaping & Lighting Assessment District No. 96 -1 is completely within the boundaries of the City of Hayward. The Assessment Diagram which shows the eighteen (18) zones is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Hayward. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Alameda, for the year when this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this report.

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 73 ends

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 74 ends

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 75 ends

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 76 ends

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 77 ends

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 78 ends

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 79 ends

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 80 ends

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 81 ends

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 82 ends

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 83 ends

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 84 ends

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 85 ends

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 86 ends

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 87 ends

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 88 ends

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 89 ends

City of Hayward
LLAD No. 96-1
Engineer’s Report, FY 2025

Page 90 ends
← All documents from this meeting