CITY COUNCIL
PRESENTATIONS
JUNE 25, 2024
Item#16
WS 24-019
Supportive
Housing
Programs
1 2023-2031 Hayward Element Implementation
Supportive Housing Zoning Amendment Recommendations
Work Session with the City Council
June 25, 2024
Taylor Richard, Associate Planner
2 Project Background & Scope
✓Address Hayward 2023-2031
Housing Element Actions
✓Allow for a Housing Continuum
to address all community
members housing needs
✓California Housing & Shelter Crisis
• Approx. 512 people experiencing
homelessness in Hayward
✓City Council Emergency
Resolutions
• Declaration of Shelter Crisis
• Suspension of Local Zoning
Regulations
3 Initial Stakeholder Feedback
✓ Need for a Wide Range Of Supportive &
Transitional Housing
✓ Need for Small Independent Living Facilities
✓ Expand License Group Home allowances
✓ Locate Supportive Housing near community
and commercial resources
✓ Require Supportive Housing have wrap
around services, staff, laundry, showers,
cooking facilities, internet & locked storage
4 Single Residence Occupancy & Group Homes
✓ Allow SROs in Some Commercial and
High-Density Residential Districts with
an AUP
✓ Draft Development & Management
Standards for SROs
✓ Increase Residents Permitted by Right
for Licensed Group homes
✓ Increase Residents for Unlicensed Group
Homes with an AUP rather than a CUP
5 Safe Parking, Shelters & Low Barrier Navigation Centers ✓ Allow Safe Parking on properties
owned by a non-profit (i.e. faith-
based organizations) in certain
zoning district with an AUP
✓ Allow Shelters & Low Barrier
Navigation Centers in additional
Commercial and Mixed-Use
Districts
✓ Draft Development & Performance
Standards
6 1 Does City Council support staff's recommendations?
Are there any other operational and/or performance standards that should be included or excluded from the housing types discussed today? Are there any recommendations or regulations staff should consider while preparing the draft zoning amendments?
Questions for Discussion
2 3
Item#17, 18, 19
PH 24-031
PH 24-032
PH 24-033
LLAD 96-1, MD-1,
MD-2
City of Hayward
LLAD/MD
Public Hearing Reports – Assessment
Districts
MAINTENANCE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
JUNE 25, 2024
Director: Todd Rullman
Management Analyst: Manny Grewal
Consultant: Kyle Tankard (SCI Consulting Group)
1 LLAD
Overview
• 18 Separate Landscaping and
Lighting Zones
• Annual Assessments on Tax Bills
fund:
o Maintenance and servicing of
landscaping, lighting, parks,
and other improvements
within each Zone
o Each Zone has a separate
budget pertaining to its
respective improvements
being maintained
2 Benefited Improvements
Landscaping, lighting, parks, and other improvements
3 Proposed FY
2025
Assessment
Rates
4 • No FY 2025 Rate Increase:
o Zones 5, 6, 14, 15, AND 18
• FY 2025 Rate Increases :
o Zones 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,
12, 13, 16, and 17
A B C D E F G H I J
Zone Name/Location # Parcels CPI Adj
FY 2025 Max
Base
Assessment
FY 2025
Rate
FY 2024
Assessment
1 Huntwood Ave. and Panjon St. 30 No 295.83 235.94 224.70 Incr 11.24 5% 2 Harder Rd. and Mocine Ave. 85 No 193.39 135.45 129.00 Incr 6.45 5% 3 Prominence 155 Yes 1,144.88 1,069.29 1,008.76 Incr 60.53 6% 4 Stratford Village 174 No 180.00 126.93 123.23 Incr 3.70 3% 5 Soto Rd. and Plum Tree St. 38 No 258.67 258.67 258.67 None - 0% 6 Pepper Tree Park 11 No 2.61 2.61 2.61 None - 0% 7 Twin Bridges 348 Yes 1,197.48 664.83 627.20 Incr 37.63 6% 8 Capitola St. 24 Yes 856.44 205.68 195.89 Incr 9.79 5% 9 Orchard Ave. 74 Yes 228.66 38.41 36.24 Incr 2.17 6% 10 Eden Shores 534 Yes 1,363.60 344.49 316.05 Incr 28.44 9% 11a Stonebrae (Developed) 617 Yes 1,934.08 408.18 374.48 Incr 33.70 9% 11b Stonebrae (Undeveloped) 27 Yes 580.22 216.34 198.47 Incr 17.87 9% 12a Eden Shores - East 261 Yes 256.28 104.16 98.26 Incr 5.90 6% 12b Eden Shores East (Spindrift) 118 Yes 246.98 104.16 98.26 Incr 5.90 6% 13 Cannery Place 599 Yes 1,454.34 417.78 394.13 Incr 23.65 6% 14 La Vista 179 Yes 747.04 683.65 683.65 None - 0% 15 Cadence 206 Yes 724.44 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 16a Blackstone (Zone A) 133 Yes 516.66 516.66 501.60 Incr 15.06 3% 16b Blackstone (Zone B) 24 Yes 542.48 542.48 526.68 Incr 15.80 3% 17 Parkside Heights 97 Yes 608.86 582.88 555.12 Incr 27.76 5% 18a SoHay Zone A (Developed) 192 Yes 464.38 300.00 300.00 None - 0% 18b SoHay Zone A (Undeveloped) 69 Yes 139.31 90.00 90.00 None - 0% 18c SoHay Zone B (Developed) 79 Yes 441.16 285.00 285.00 None - 0% 18d SoHay Zone B (Undeveloped) 93 Yes 132.35 85.50 85.50 None - 0% TABLE 2: ASSESSMENT AMOUNTS BY BENEFIT ZONE
Change from last year
Next Steps for LLAD, Zones 1-18
I. Hold Public Hearing
Staff recommends that Council then adopts two
resolutions:
1. Approving FY 2025 Engineer’s Report and ordering the Levy of FY 2025 Assessments
2. Appropriating FY 2025 Budget
5 Maintenance
District No. 1
(Stratford
Village)
6 Proposed FY
2025
Assessment
Rate
• Maximum Base Assessment Rate:
o $243.92
• FY 2025 Assessment Rate:
o $243.92 (Same rate as last
year)
7 City of Hayward
Maintenance District No. 1 - Pacheco Wy., Stratford Rd., Russ Ln., & Ward Crk.
Fund 270, Project 3745
Established 1993, 174 Parcels
FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025
Budget Detail Actual Actual Estimated Proposed
Assessment
a. Maximum Base Assessment Amount 243.92 243.92 243.92 243.92 b. Annual Per Parcel Assessment 243.92 243.92 243.92 243.92 c. # of Parcels 174 174 174 174
d. Total Amount Assessed for the District: 42,442 42,442 42,442 42,442 Income
a. Annual Assessment Revenue 42,910 42,369 42,442 42,442 b. Minus County Tax Collection Fee (1.7%) (722) (722) (722) (722) c. Other - 209 - -
d. Total Revenue: 42,188 41,856 41,721 41,721
Services
a. Utilities: PGE 2,390 2,657 2,737 3,010
b. Pump Station O&M - ACFCD 42,281 20,000
c. Proposition 218 27,500 23,000
d. Property Owner Noticing - 7 7 7
e. Annual Reporting 1,012 480 494 509
f. City Administration - 3,825 3,940 4,058
g. Total Expenditures: 73,183 6,969 7,178 50,585
Account Balance
a. Beginning Account Balance 10,345 (20,649) 14,238 48,781 b. Net Change (Revenue - Expenditures) (30,995) 34,888 34,543 (8,864) c. Ending Account Balance: (20,649) 14,238 48,781 39,917 Next Steps for MD No. 1
I. Hold Public Hearing
Staff recommends that Council then adopts two
resolutions:
1. Approving FY 2025 Engineer’s Report and ordering the Levy of FY 2025 Assessments
2. Appropriating FY 2025 Budget
8 Maintenance
District No. 2
(Eden
Shores)
9 Proposed FY
2025
Assessment
Rate
• Maximum Base Assessment Rate:
o $1,152.44 (2.36% CPI increase)
• FY 2025 Assessment Rate:
o $272.17 (3% increase from FY
24)
10 City of Hayward
Maintenance District No. 2 - Eden Shores - Water Buffer Fund 271, Project 3718
Established 2003, 534 Parcels
FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025
Actual Actual Estimated Proposed
Assessment
a. Maximum Base Assessment Amount 1,016.39 1,069.14 1,125.80 1,152.44 b. Annual Per Parcel Assessment 228.79 240.22 264.24 272.17 c. # of Parcels 534 534 534 534 d. Total Amount Assessed for the District: 122,175 128,277 141,105 145,339 Income
a. Annual Assessment Revenue 122,605 128,468 141,105 145,339 b. Minus County Tax Collection Fee (1.7%) (2,077) (2,181) (2,399) (2,471) c. Other (7,045) 2,973 3,600 3,700 d. Total Revenue: 113,483 129,260 142,306 146,568 Services
a. Utilities: Water 50,682 61,305 70,000 77,000 b. Utilities: PGE 16,138 20,104 18,000 21,600 c. Landscaping Maintenance 32,688 32,688 33,669 34,679 d. One-time Project/Maintenance 42,973 9,899 45,000 56,350 e. Fence Repair 75,000
f. Fire Hazard Mitigation (Goats) - - 7,700 7,931 g. Property Owner Noticing 218 21 22 23 h. Annual Reporting 1,012 480 494 509 i. City Administration 4,202 4,328 4,458 4,592 j. Total Expenditures: 147,912 128,825 179,343 277,683 Account Balance
a. Beginning Account Balance 374,652 340,223 340,659 303,622 b. Net Change (Revenue - Expenditures) (34,429) 436 (37,037) (131,115) c. Ending Account Balance: 340,223 340,659 303,622 172,507 Next Steps for MD No. 2
I. Hold Public Hearing
Staff recommends that Council then adopts two
resolutions:
1. Approving FY 2025 Engineer’s Report and ordering the Levy of FY 2025 Assessments
2. Appropriating FY 2025 Budget
11 Item#20
PH 24-030
Master Fee
Schedule
June 25, 2024
Master Fee Schedule
Fiscal Year 2025
Nicole Gonzales, Director of Finance
Background & Requirements
User Fee Study Update
Master Fee Updates and Legislative Requirements:
Prop 26 – November 2010
Assures that taxes are not disguised as fees: taxes must be approved by voters whereas legislative bodies, such as a City Council, can approve fees.
Prop 218 – November 1996
Requires voter approval prior to imposition or increase of general taxes, assessments, and certain user fees.
CEQA
Key Factors for Changes in FY 2025
A portion of the changes
included in the master fee
schedule for adoption have
been previously approved by
resolution.
Fee increases to achieve full
cost recovery in services
provided.
Fee increases or additions
governed by outside agencies.
Proposed Fee Changes
City Clerk
Certification of Documents - Fee increase to
recover costs.
Changes in Express Mail from City of Hayward
mailed to US Department of State and Express Mail
from US Department of State mailed to Customer -
Fees set by the United States Postal Service and US
Department of State respectively.
Development Services
Create Mills Act Program fees
Affordable Housing In-Lieu Fees
Park Impact Fees
Proposed Fee Changes
Public Safety
Fire Department – Establish rental fees for Fire
Station 6 / Regional Fire Training Center
Police Department - Concealed Carry Weapons
Permit
Public Works & Utilities
Traffic Impact Fees
Sewer Connection Fees/Interest Rates on Sewer
Connection Fee Payment Agreements
Sanitary Sewer Service Charges and Fees
Language
Minimum Charges for Water Meter Hydrant Usage
Monthly Meter Service Charges for Water Hydrant
Meters
Recommendation
That the City Council…
Adopts a resolution approving the Fiscal Year 2025 Master Fee Schedule and finds the action exempt from CEQA review.
Discussion & Questions
?
!
Item#21
LB 24-018
Military
Equipment Use
1 Hayward Police
Department:
2024 AB No. 481 Annual Report
2 Purpose
• Provide information regarding Assembly Bill No. 481.
• Present the Hayward Police Department’s FY 2024 AB No. 481 Annual Report, including the funding, acquisition, and use of the equipment considered “Military equipment”.
• Discuss future acquisitions needed to continue to provide vital public safety services to our community.
3 Background
AB No. 481, which became effective on January 1, 2022, was created to address transparency issues in the funding, acquisition, and use of law enforcement equipment that lawmakers have designated as “military equipment.”
AB No. 481, codified in Government Code section(s) 7070 through 7075, requires law enforcement agencies to obtain approval of the applicable governing body (City Council), by adoption of a written Military Equipment Use Policy, via ordinance, at a public hearing, before law enforcement agencies may take certain actions relating to the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment, as defined by the legislature.
Once approval is granted, AB No. 481 requires law enforcement agencies to submit an annual Military Equipment Use Report to the City Council, summarizing the use of each type of equipment, complaints received, internal audits and information about violations of the Military Equipment Use Policy, the cost of military equipment, and other similar information.
On an annual basis, the City Council must review the Military Use Policy and ordinance as well as the Military Equipment Use Report and vote on whether to renew the ordinance. 4 Use of “Military Equipment”
Below is a list of HPD’s “Military Equipment” and usage (April 2023 – March 2024):
1. Robot – 1
2. Command Vehicle – 2
3. UAS – 6
4. Armored Personnel Carrier – 19
5. Noise Flash Diversionary Device – 2
6. Chemical Agents “Tear Gas” – 2
7. Carbine Rifles – 2
The following listed “Military Equipment” was not utilized during this reporting period:
Breaching Apparatus/Shotgun Slugs, H&K MP5 and H&K PDW Entry Rifle, PWS MK216- LE Precision Rifle, Remington 700 Long Rifle, Pepper Powder Less Lethal Launcher, Specialty Impact Munitions Systems and Munitions, Specialty Ammunition. 5 Costs
*Total personnel costs over this period were $182,561. This total represents the personnel cost associated with training related to “Military equipment” denoted above with *. **There were no Storage or Transportation costs associated with owning/possessing equipment defined as “Military equipment” per AB No. 481.
# Equipment Acquisition Training Maintenance
1 Robot $15,901 $-0* $-0
2 UAS $74,642 $-0* $3,335
3 Armored Personnel Carrier $-0 $-0* $1,242
4 Command and Control Vehicle $-0 $-0* $542
5 Breaching Apparatus/Shotgun Slugs $-0 $-0* $-0
6 Carbine Rifles $18,020 $-0* $-0
7 H&K MP5 and H&K PDW Entry Rifle $-0 $-0* $-0
8 PWS MK216-LE Precision Rifle $-0 $-0* $-0
9 Remington 700 Long Rifle $-0 $-0* $-0
10 Noise Flash Diversionary Device $-0 $-0* $-0
11 Chemical Agents “Tear Gas” $-0 $-0* $-0
12 Pepper Powder Less Lethal Launcher $-0 $-0* $-0
13 Specialty Impact Munitions Systems and Munitions $-0 $-0* $-0 14 Ammunition $130,595 $43,676 $-0
TOTAL $239,158 $226,237 $5,119
6 Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Budget, 99.5%
AB 481 spending, 0.5%
Military Equipment Data
Fiscal Budget AB 481 spending
7 Projected Acquisitions for FY 2024
• Some purchases and acquisitions can be anticipated
• Unanticipated replacement of existing AB No. 481 equipment may be necessary due to damage beyond that of repair, unanticipated usage, etc. (handled on a case-by-case basis depending on operational needs)
• Consumable equipment acquisitions in the next 12 months will remain consistent with current department replenishment schedules.
Consumables are as follows:
• Ammunition- all calibers
• Diversionary Devices
• Chemical Agents
• Specialty Munitions (40mm and Less Lethal Munitions)
8 Projected Acquisitions for FY 2025
Non-consumables are as follows:
• Robot - $16,000
• UAS (6) - $75,000
• Sniper Rifles (5) - $10,000
• Specialty Ammunition - $50,000
• Noise Flash Diversionary Device (12 cases) - $12,205
• Specialty Impact Munitions Systems and Ammunition (4) - $4,740 9 Recommendation
1. Renew the City Ordinance related to the Use of Military Equipment by the HPD (No changes)
2. Renew HPD Policy 706 (No changes)
3. Approval of equipment replacement/acquisition in FY 25 10 Questions