Council Infrastructure & Airport
Committee
CITY OF HAYWARD
Agenda
Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
Hayward Executive Airport
20301 Skywest Drive
Hayward, CA/Hybrid
5:30 PMWednesday, October 23, 2024
NOTICE: The Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee will hold a hybrid meeting in the Hayward Executive Airport Conference Room and virtually via Zoom.
The PUBLIC COMMENT section provides an opportunity to address the Committee on items not listed on the agenda. The Committee welcomes comments and requests that speakers present their remarks in a respectful manner, within established time limits and focus on issues which directly affect the City or are within the jurisdiction of the City. As the Committee is prohibited by State law from discussing items not listed on the agenda, your item will be taken under consideration and may be referred to staff for further action. Speakers shall not use threatening, profane, or abusive language which disrupts, disturbs, or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of a Committee meeting. The City is committed to maintaining a workplace free of unlawful harassment and is mindful that City staff regularly attend Committee meetings. Discriminatory statements or conduct that is hostile, intimidating, oppressive, or abusive and disruptive to a meeting and will not be tolerated.
How to submit written Public Comment:
Send an email to [email protected] by 1:00 p.m. the day of the meeting. Please identify the Agenda Item Number in the subject line of your email. Emails will be compiled into one file, distributed to the Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee and City staff, and Published in the City's Meeting and Agenda Center under Documents Received After Published Agenda.
October 23, 2024Council Infrastructure & Airport
Committee
Agenda
How to provide live Public Comment during the Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee Meeting:
1. Attend in person at the Hayward Executive Airport, 20301 Skywest Drive, Hayward, CA
2. Please click on the link below to join the webinar:
Join from a PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone or Android device:
Please click this URL to join.
https://hayward.zoom.us/j/86090540131?pwd=KeIdDkI8BadIFVnRTYh33XPMDjJK0O.1 Passcode: CIAC@1023
Or One tap mobile:
+
16699006833,,86090540131#,,,,*972041232# US (San Jose)
+16469313860,,86090540131#,,,,*972041232# US
Or join by phone:
Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):
US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 646 931 3860
Webinar ID: 860 9054 0131
Passcode: 972041232
International numbers available: https://hayward.zoom.us/u/kei4T0qx52
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Approval of Minutes of the Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee (CIAC) Meeting Held on August 28, 2024.
MIN 24-105
1. Attachments: Attachment I Minutes CIAC from 082824
REPORTS/ACTION ITEMS
East Bay Greenway Multimodal Project - Status UpdateACT 24-0812.
Attachments: Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Existing and Proposed Sections
October 23, 2024Council Infrastructure & Airport
Committee
Agenda
3. ORAL REPORT: Skywest Property Update
4. ORAL REPORT: Taxiways Zulu & A1 - Project Update
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Proposed 2024/2025 Planning Calendar: Review and Comment5. ACT 24-080 Attachments: Attachment I Staff Report
COMMITTEE MEMBER/STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REFERRALS
ADJOURNMENT
CITY OF HAYWARD
Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
File #: MIN 24-105
DATE: October 23, 2024
TO: Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee FROM: Director of Public Works
SUBJECT
Approval of Minutes of the Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee (CIAC) Meeting Held on August 28, 2024.
RECOMMENDATION
That the CIAC reviews and approves the August 28, 2024 CIAC meeting minutes...End
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I August 28, 2024 CIAC Meeting Minutes
CITY OF HAYWARD Printed on 10/19/2024Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
COUNCIL INFRASTRUCTURE & AIRPORT COMMITTEE MEETING
Hybrid Participation - Digital Zoom Meeting/Conference Room 2A August 28, 2024
5:30 p.m.
MEETING MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER: Meeting called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Chair Salinas.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present:
Angela Andrews, City Council Member
George Syrop, City Council Member
Mark Salinas, Mayor/ Chair
Staff Present:
Alex Ameri, Director of Public Works
Amber Parras, Senior Secretary
Colin Patterson, Associate Transportation Planner
Hugh Louch, Deputy Director of Public Works – Transportation Fred Clay, Executive Fellow
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were none.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Approval of Minutes of the Council Airport Committee (CAC) Meeting Held on June 26, 2024
The item was moved by CM Andrews, seconded by CM Syrop, and approved unanimously.
REPORTS/ACTION ITEMS
2. Gading Road Complete Streets Project
Deputy of Public Works Transportation Louch provided a synopsis of the staff report and presented a PowerPoint presentation.
Public Comments
Patrick Virgin, a resident of Hayward, discussed his changing views on bike lanes in his neighborhood, now supporting their current alignment while expressing concerns about traffic and cyclist safety. He proposed improving traffic signal timing at Huntwood Way and Gading Road to reduce congestion and suggested adding a controlled green left turn light for better traffic flow. He also advocated for maintaining Tennyson Road as a four-lane street and expressed hope for the prompt completion of ongoing paving projects.
Jess Gunn, a resident of Hayward, commended initiatives aimed at improving pedestrian and bike safety, highlighting the importance of consistent design to prevent abrupt changes. He raised concerns about driveway access and proposed limiting the height of parked vehicles to enhance visibility. He also pointed out a poorly maintained bus stop in the Schafer area, which poses challenges for wheelchair users, and called for repairs to broken sidewalk segments on Inglewood Street. He noted traffic delays at Harder Road and Gading Road due to left turns onto Huntwood, suggesting either extending the left turn lane or redesigning it for better traffic flow. He thanked City staff for their progressive efforts in developing complete streets that prioritize pathways.
Robert Prinz, Advocacy Director with Bike East Bay, expressed appreciation for the Gading Road project but voiced concerns regarding wide buffered bike lanes which encourage drivers to use them as passing or speeding lanes. He mentioned that some cities are implementing light separation within the buffer space to deter this behavior and increase cyclists' comfort while still allowing drivers to access legal parking spots. He advocated for removing double turn lanes to improve pedestrian safety, create additional space for better facilities, and reduce conflicts between pedestrians and drivers, urging the City to consider these modifications.
Alejandro Jasso, a Hayward resident, praised the City's efforts to improve connectivity between Tennyson and Harder Road but shared that poor conditions often force him to ride on the sidewalk. He also advocated for crosswalks at key intersections and physical barriers to improve cyclist and pedestrian safety.
Tyler Dragoni, a Hayward resident, supported the City's infrastructure improvements aimed at enhancing safety for students and commuters. He emphasized the need for more crosswalks and physical barriers to promote safer transportation options, noting that safety is a major obstacle to increasing biking as a viable mode of transport. He urged the City to prioritize safety in its planning, highlighting vehicular violence as a critical issue that requires attention.
Bruce, a Hayward resident, strongly supported the City's bike lanes, particularly the buffered design, and advocated for implementing light transitions for added effectiveness.
While acknowledging issues with parking encroaching on bike lanes, he remained a proponent of any protection or separation for cyclists. He thanked the City for its efforts and suggested designing bulb-outs with a sharp radius and two pedestrian ramps to enhance safety and accessibility.
Committee Member’s Comments
CM Andrews expressed gratitude to the staff for their presentation and inquired about the status of proposed warning measures for Gading Road, which could help address ongoing concerns. She also asked about potential improvements to street lighting beyond the existing options. She noted her previous request for infographics for notifications and acknowledged the effort to distribute 1,000 notifications but sought clarification on
whether those notifications were being shared on social media to keep the community informed. She expressed satisfaction with the inclusion of the Safe Routes for Seniors Project and asked for details on its implementation, particularly regarding the additional time allocated to slow down traffic.
CM Syrop thanked Staff for their presentation and efforts on various projects. He expressed strong support for light separation in bike lanes, suggesting that positioning them next to the curb would encourage more cyclists to use them rather than the sidewalks. He advocated for the effective implementation of protected bike lanes and endorsed the use of bulb-outs and grading plans to enhance pedestrian experiences in residential neighborhoods. He expressed his support for the project's direction, highlighting the positive impact of walkable communities on local businesses.
CM Andrews inquired about the regulations regarding the distance between crosswalks on a street. She asked if there are specific rules governing the number of crosswalks that can be installed before it becomes problematic, particularly in situations where a car stops at one crosswalk while another is nearby. CM Andrews mentioned participating in a Walk Audit in 2018 and inquired whether there were identifiers of crosswalks included in that report.
The item was moved by CM Andrews, and seconded by CM Syrop, along with the conditions that were previously discussed.
3. Proposed Plan for the D Street (East of 2nd Street) Traffic Calming Project Associate Transportation Planner Patterson provided a synopsis of the staff report and presented a PowerPoint presentation.
Public Comments
Tyler Dragoni, a resident of Hayward, expressed concerns about traffic safety on D Street, stressed the necessity of a stop sign at the intersection of 4th Street and D Street, given the high-speed traffic and limited visibility. He also mentioned increased traffic from a church down the hill, highlighting the urgency for a stop sign at this critical intersection that connects their neighborhood to other areas, including Trader Joe's on Grove Way. He urged Council to address the issue for the safety of residents.
Kira Miller, a Clay Street resident, expressed concerns about traffic safety on Clay Street, particularly at its intersection with D Street. She noted that drivers frequently speed down Clay Street, the lack of sidewalks exacerbates the issue, leaving children vulnerable while walking. She urged Council to prioritize the safety of residents on Clay Street and called for enhanced traffic safety measures to protect neighborhood children and create a safer environment for all.
Tiega Varlack, a Kings Court resident, raised safety concerns regarding Kings Court, located west of 7th Street. She noted that residents struggle with left turns from Kings Court, as
vehicles often accelerate downhill from the nearby stop sign at 7th Street without stopping.
She suggested installing a mirror on Kings Court to help drivers see oncoming traffic from the left before entering the street; and expressed concerns about potential traffic congestion if a stop sign were added at the nearby intersection of 4th Street.
Robert Prinz, Advocacy Director with Bike East Bay, expressed gratitude to staff for their efforts on the project, especially for considering an uphill climbing bike lane on D Street. He pointed out that the addition of the bike lane would narrow the shared travel lane for downhill traffic, potentially calming traffic by reducing lane width. He emphasized the importance of placing shared lane markings in the center of the lane, rather than closer to parking. He recommended using a one-piece preformed thermoplastic for lane markings instead of standard stencils; and encouraged staff to explore more durable alternatives for quick-build bulb-outs or sidewalk extensions that align with budget constraints while ensuring longevity.
Bruce Dougie, a Hayward resident, expressed strong support for the plan, particularly praising the inclusion of uphill on downhill direction bike lanes. He emphasized the need for frequent sharrow markings, suggesting they be placed every 50 to 75 ft to encourage cyclists to take the lane, ideally using green background markings for improved visibility.
He advocated for implementing stop signs at key intersections and called for more marked crosswalks to clearly signal pedestrian presence. He commended the lane-narrowing strategy, noting the clever decision to create 10-ft lanes and the innovative choice to split lanes at 7.5 ft.
Erika Crawford, a D Street resident, expressed her excitement about the proposed plan but raised two main concerns regarding the stop signs at the intersection of 4th and D Street, noting that her car was totaled there in December 2022. Living between 7th Street and the City limits, she inquired about the possibility of installing feedback signs for speed or speed humps. She observed that vehicles coming down from Fairview often travel at or near highway speeds before entering the city area, raising safety concerns for residents.
Alejandro Jasso, a Hayward resident and member of the Local Bike Group, Bike East Bay, shared his insights on traffic concerns, particularly regarding speeding. He urged the City to consider traffic calming measures like those implemented on Fairview Avenue, which have proven effective, such as raised crosswalks and roundabouts that promote safer driving speeds and reduce accidents. He suggested that implementing similar measures, including roundabouts and raised intersections, could be beneficial at specific intersections in the area.
Esther Letteney, a D Street resident, expressed concerns about traffic safety in her neighborhood. She inquired about the potential addition of a stop sign at the intersection of D Street and 4th Street, seeking clarification on whether this was part of the proposed measures. She supported the implementation of a traffic circle at that intersection and
acknowledged the concerns about fire truck access due to speed bumps, she urged the City to find solutions that enhance safety for residents exiting their driveways. She advocated for more crosswalks along D Street.
Cindy Clements, a resident of Hayward, expressed her strong support for traffic safety measures; the importance of installing a stop sign or a traffic circle at the intersection of 4th and D Street. She requested the installation of speed bumps between 7th and 4th Streets to address speeding concerns in the neighborhood.
Edith Bretado-Bahir, a D Street resident, urged for the installation of speed humps to slow down traffic and suggested adding more crosswalks to improve pedestrian safety. She emphasized the need for additional traffic calming measures to create a safer environment for residents and children playing in their front yards.
Hayes Morehouse, a 7th Street resident, appreciated the project and suggested practical improvements to enhance safety at the intersection of 7th and D Street. He proposed painting the curb red downhill to indicate danger and encourage drivers to slow down; he expressed support for the bike lane concept, hoping it would facilitate safer movement around downtown in the future. He also addressed the overall condition of 4th Street, highlighting its inadequacy and calling for improvements to make it safer for all road users.
Eric Ruelas, an 8th Street resident, shared his safety concerns about the area, emphasizing the challenges of turning left at the intersection. He noted that although there is a red curb in the area, large trucks still park there, obstructing visibility and adding to the danger.
Echoing the concerns of others, he advocated for the installation of speed bumps and additional crosswalks to improve safety, particularly for families and children biking in the neighborhood.
Calvin Lin, a D Street resident, expressed his support for the project, particularly advocating for the installation of speed humps and stop signs to slow down traffic. He emphasized the urgency of addressing safety concerns in the area, noting that the current conditions have resulted in fatalities. He highlighted the historical context of the road's designation as a thoroughfare and stressed the need for traffic calming measures to protect residents and ensure safer conditions.
Committee Member’s Comments
Chair Salinas acknowledged the safety issues at the intersection of 3rd and 4th Street, emphasizing that it is a significant concern. He noted that as the City plans renovations for the area. He affirmed that the observations shared by community members regarding the conditions on 4th Street from D Street to C Street were accurate and deserved attention.
CM Syrop expressed gratitude for the presentation and public comments regarding the project; he acknowledged the need for additional improvements, particularly advocating for more crosswalks along D Street to enhance pedestrian safety and assert their right of way. He supported the Chair's suggestion to explore traffic circles at key intersections, especially at 4th and Clay Street, to improve safety. Regarding traffic calming, he preferred physical measures over speed limit signs, arguing that modifying the environment would be more effective in slowing down drivers. He inquired about the proposed type of medians—whether they would be painted or concrete—and asked if vehicles exiting Beaver Drive would need to make right turns only due to the new median installations.
CM Andrews expressed appreciation for the presentation and raised a question regarding the proposed stop sign at the intersection of 4th and D Street, inquiring if alternative solutions could be considered if a stop sign is deemed incompatible. She encouraged the exploration of different ideas that could effectively address safety concerns at that intersection. CM Andrews brought up the activity at San Felipe Park, which is managed by H.A.R.D., and inquired if any conversations had been initiated to coordinate signage or other measures to slow down traffic and enhance safety in the area. She also referenced the public comment regarding Kings Court and asked if there were options that staff could explore to make that area safer, as it requires attention.
CM Syrop acknowledged the requests from residents for speed humps on the specific road in question and emphasized the need to consider exceptions to the existing guidelines. He questioned what steps would be necessary for Council to approve speed humps on this road, highlighting the unique circumstances that might warrant such a decision. He urged staff to explore potential avenues for addressing residents' safety concerns while navigating the limitations of the current guidelines.
Chair Salinas acknowledged the clear issue of speeding and emphasized the importance of implementing traffic-calming measures. He stressed that environmental changes could play a crucial role in slowing down traffic and improving safety. He highlighted the need to address safety concerns at the intersection of 4th and D Street and pointed out the heavy traffic and parked cars near the San Felipe Park area. He underscored the necessity of tackling these challenges to enhance overall safety in the neighborhood, emphasizing that the situation requires attention and action.
In response to a request from a resident, Chair Salinas reopened the Public Comment period.
Diane Riggs, a resident of Hayward, expressed concern about the dramatic increase in traffic over the years highlighting the difficulty and danger of exiting Beaver Drive due to the high speeds of vehicles coming down the hill. She urged the City to prioritize these issues in its efforts to enhance safety for residents and pedestrians.
4. Vision Zero Update
The item was rescheduled for a future date.
ORAL REPORT
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
5. Proposed 2024 Planning Calendar: Review and Comment
CM Syrop emphasized the growing concerns in the community about the Amtrak station.
He suggested providing clear communication to address these concerns and alleviate worries. He recommended issuing a staff report or similar communication to clarify the project's timeline and what changes, if any, can be expected in the near future.
CM Andrews voiced concerns about the conditions of freeway exits, particularly regarding cleanliness and safety for nearby residents. She inquired whether the responsibility for maintaining these conditions falls under the City's infrastructure management or if it lies with Caltrans, given that the exits are situated on their property.
COMMITTEE MEMBER/STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REFERRALS
CM Syrop announced that the last Sunday of September will feature another South Hayward Market, which will take place at South Hayward BART from 11:00 AM to 4:00 PM.
He encouraged community members to attend the event as it is free and will include food trucks, family activities, vendors, and various resources available.
ADJOURNMENT
Chair Salinas adjourned the meeting at 6:55 p.m.
MEETINGS
Attendance
Present
8/28/24
Meeting
Present
to Date This
Fiscal Year
Excused
to Date This
Fiscal Year
Absent
to Date This
Fiscal Year
Angela Andrews ✓ 4 0 0
Mark Salinas ✓ 4 0 0
George Syrop ✓ 4 0 0
CITY OF HAYWARD
Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
File #: ACT 24-081
DATE: October 23, 2024
TO: Council Infrastructure Committee
FROM: Director of Public Works
SUBJECT
East Bay Greenway Multimodal Project - Status Update
RECOMMENDATION
That the Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee (CIAC) provides feedback on the status, draft alignment, and types of bicycle routes for the East Bay Greenway Multimodal (EBGWMM)-Hayward Segment Project.
SUMMARY
The Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC) is the project sponsor and implementing agency for the EBGWMM along the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) alignment from Lake Merritt station in Oakland to South Hayward BART station. This staff report discusses the EBGWMM- Hayward Segment, a near-term project within the jurisdiction of the City of Hayward (City). Alameda CTC is coordinating with the City and other project stakeholders such as AC Transit, BART, and various community groups to develop the project.
The goals of the EBGWMM-Hayward Segment project are to:
· Create a continuous north/south bike facility connecting the Hayward and South Hayward BART stations.
· Provide safe, high-quality bicycle facilities suitable for people of all ages and abilities. · Improve safety by physically separating bicyclists from high-speed vehicular traffic to the extent feasible.
· Improve access to regional transit, schools, Downtown areas, and major activity centers. · Improve multimodal access to BART.
· Reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
The EBGWMM-Hayward Segment project is currently in conceptual design phase. The project team has conducted robust public outreach, coordinated with a City-sponsored Active Transportation Working Group, and developed a draft alignment and recommended facility types for each segment of the overall project. The City and Alameda CTC are seeking feedback on the project’s upcoming CITY OF HAYWARD Printed on 10/19/2024Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
File #:ACT 24-081
conceptual design phase.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II Existing and Proposed Sections
CITY OF HAYWARD Printed on 10/19/2024Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
DATE: October 23, 2024
TO: Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee
FROM: Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: East Bay Greenway Multimodal Project – Status Update
RECOMMENDATION
That the Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee (CIAC) provides feedback on the status, draft alignment, and types of bicycle routes for the East Bay Greenway Multimodal (EBGWMM)-Hayward Segment Project.
SUMMARY
The Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC) is the project sponsor and implementing agency for the EBGWMM along the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) alignment from Lake Merritt station in Oakland to South Hayward BART station. This staff report discusses the EBGWMM-Hayward Segment, a near-term project within the jurisdiction of the City of Hayward (City). Alameda CTC is coordinating with the City and other project stakeholders such as AC Transit, BART, and various community groups to develop the project.
The goals of the EBGWMM-Hayward Segment project are to:
Create a continuous north/south bike facility connecting the Hayward and South Hayward BART stations.
Provide safe, high-quality bicycle facilities suitable for people of all ages and abilities. Improve safety by physically separating bicyclists from high-speed vehicular traffic to the extent feasible.
Improve access to regional transit, schools, Downtown areas, and major activity centers.
Improve multimodal access to BART.
Reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
The EBGWMM-Hayward Segment project is currently in conceptual design phase. The project team has conducted robust public outreach, coordinated with a City-sponsored Active Transportation Working Group, and developed a draft alignment and recommended facility types for each segment of the overall project. The City and Alameda CTC are seeking feedback on the project’s upcoming conceptual design phase.
BACKGROUND
The East Bay Greenway is envisioned as a 37-mile regional trail connecting northern and southern Alameda County cities. The project originated with a non-profit group, Urban Ecology, which envisioned a trail in the BART/Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) Oakland Subdivision corridor from Oakland to Hayward. Upon passage of 2014 Alameda County Measure BB, the East Bay Greenway was included as one of three major trails in the Transportation Expenditure Plan.
During project development, several key risks were identified related to costs for land acquisition, timing of negotiations, removal of likely hazardous material, and ownership. In December 2021, due to the complexity and potential timeframe of the original concept, the Alameda CTC Commission voted to identify a new alignment for the East Bay Greenway Project that can be delivered in the near-term, 3-5 years. Improvements associated with the near-term, multimodal alignment are considered Phase 1 of the East Bay Greenway, with the proposed urban trail on UPRR corridor becoming Phase 2.
On October 25, 20231, Alameda CTC staff presented an initial EBGWMM alignment in Hayward and solicited input from the Council Infrastructure Committee (CIC). Then on December 7, 2023, Alameda CTC approved the evaluation of the street network for EBGWMM-Hayward project and directed its staff to form an Active Transportation Work Group (ATWG) comprised of members of bicycle advocacy organizations, people with disabilities, school & park districts, business community groups, parents of school going children and interested local residents.
The ATWG advises project staff and stakeholders on key project decisions, ensuring that the preferred alignment is responsive to local context and needs while being suitable for bicyclists of all ages and abilities. It has assisted with community outreach and reviewed the project’s studies of existing conditions and the draft alignment and facility types. The ATWG has met three times and will meet at least once more in the spring.
As part of its outreach strategy, the project team has conducted an online survey, met with community-based organizations, held walking and biking audits of the study corridor, conducted focus group meetings, and held work sessions with the ATWG.
The Phase 1 EBGWMM project seeks to provide an all-ages-and-abilities inter-jurisdictional active transportation facility generally following the BART tracks. The proposed project alignment is integrated with local bikeway projects and runs on-street in a mix of separated and shared facilities depending on the characteristics of each street. The project will consist of shared-use paths, buffered bike lanes, protected bike lanes, bike boulevards with traffic calming, pedestrian crossing enhancements, pedestrian accessibility improvements, traffic signal modifications, lighting upgrades, bus boarding islands, transit signal priority, placemaking elements, landscaping, and urban design features.
This item discusses the project implementation within the city limits within the next 3-5 1 https://hayward.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=6390422&GUID=2EDD3DE2-F46F-448D-B897- 766DD2AEB8A5&Options=&Search=
years.
DISCUSSION
Alameda CTC’s Commission approved an all-ages-and-abilities facility policy in December 2022, which provides guidance for selecting an appropriate bicycle facility based on traffic speeds and volumes. The intent is for bicycle facilities to be comfortable to use regardless of a bicyclist’s age or experience. Busy arterial streets will only be comfortable for most riders with Class IV separated facilities, but it may be comfortable to share traffic-calmed, low- volume local streets. The EBGWMM-Hayward project consists of a mix of local, collector, and arterial streets, and the draft alignments and facility types are tailored to each street’s specific characteristics.
Recognizing the challenges in establishing an all-ages-and-abilities route through Downtown and Mission Boulevard, Alameda CTC staff began evaluating alternatives consistent with the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan west of the BART and Union Pacific tracks in late 2022. Streets were evaluated based on first- and last-mile connectivity to BART stations, transportation safety needs, and impact to the existing curb lines to install all-ages-and- abilities bicycle facilities. The City Council and Alameda CTC approved the evaluation of the street network for EBGWMM in Fall 2023 and directed staff to form an ATWG to help the project team develop context-sensitive, all-ages-and-abilities facilities.
Alameda CTC also conducted traffic and parking studies to collectively inform the alignment and array of facility types that could be implemented in the near term. Ultimately, both Alameda CTC and the City staff recommend further exploring a facility on the following streets:
Table 1: Recommended alignment and facility types
Street Extents Facility Type
Montgomery Street Sunset Blvd to B St Bike Boulevard
B Street Montgomery St to Grand St Two-way separated bike lane Grand Street B St to Meek Ave One-way separated bike lane Meek Avenue Grand St to Jackson St One-way separated bike lane Silva Avenue Jackson St to Sycamore Ave Bike Boulevard
Sycamore Avenue Silva Ave to Whitman St Two-way separated bike lane Whitman St Sycamore Ave to Tennyson Rd Two-way separated bike lane Tennyson Rd Whitman St to Dixon St Two-way separated bike lane Note: The streets described are consistent with the City’s current Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (2020).
A map of the proposed alignment and facility types is shown below:
Figure 1: Map of the Proposed East Bay Greenway Alignment Attachment II includes draft existing conditions and concept designs for select segments along the route.
The study also assessed the feasibility of facilities on parallel streets that would be consistent with the all-ages-and-abilities policy.
Due to the importance of Mission Boulevard to transportation safety and its close relationship with the rest of the corridor, Alameda CTC is also evaluating pedestrian improvements at 11 intersections along Mission Boulevard. City staff are also evaluating opportunities to implement bicycling improvements along segments of Mission Boulevard and will be conducting a multimodal corridor study funded with a federal grant that will evaluate opportunities to implement bicycle facilities and make other safety enhancements.
Alameda CTC, in coordination with the City, has shared the draft alignment and types of facilities with ATWG and other community members and now is seeking feedback from the CIAC, including on outreach efforts, studies completed to date, a draft alignment, types of facilities that can be implemented within the existing roadway, and associated tradeoffs.
ECONOMIC IMPACT
High quality bike lanes and pedestrian infrastructure can increase the value of nearby homes.
Studies also show that bike lanes benefit businesses with increased sales, translating to increased sales tax revenue. Bicycle infrastructure encourages active transportation use, lowering the overall transportation costs for users and leading to better health outcomes from increased physical activity.
STRATEGIC ROADMAP
This agenda item supports the “Invest in Infrastructure” focus area and specifically supports implementation of the following:
Invest in Multi-Modal Transportation
Project N1: Continue to implement major corridor traffic calming initiatives. Project N6: Continue to add approximate 10 miles of bike lanes annually, with a focus on protected bike lanes and intersections that have high traffic/incidents.
SUSTAINABILITY FEATURES
This project will provide high-quality bicycle and pedestrian improvements that will encourage road users to adopt more active forms of transportation. Mode shift towards active transportation provides environmental benefits by reducing traffic congestion and lowering the rate of greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, active transportation infrastructure supports physical activity, leading to improved physical and mental health.
PUBLIC CONTACT
The project team has embarked on a robust public outreach effort to evaluate the alignment and types of facilities for near-term implementation. Outreach is occurring in three phases, shown below:
Table 2: Phases of Public Outreach
Phase Outreach Goal Timeline
1 Share information about this EBGWMM-Hayward
Segment project and gather input on existing conditions.
March 2024 – June
2024
2 Solicit input on the EBGWMM-Hayward Segment project
alternatives to inform the recommended (draft)
alignment.
July 2024 – October
2024
3 Provide updates on the concept design for the
EBGWMM-Hayward Segment project and solicit
feedback.
December 2024 –
March 2025
Alameda CTC reached out to the community to share information and solicit input through the following activities:
Coordination via e-mails and website announcements (Project Website: Alameda CTC East Bay Greenway Website)
Pop-up events at the Hawaiian May Day Festival and Eden Greenway hot meal and grocery giveaway
Walking and biking tours of the corridor, with attendees recommended by the ATWG Focus groups
Coordination with the professional networks of ATWG members Mailers & Flyer
E-blasts
Mailers and flyers were made available in English, Spanish, simplified Chinese, Tagalog, and Vietnamese.
FISCAL IMPACT
The current phase of the project is funded by the Alameda CTC. The ultimate construction project is likely to be funded from a mix of existing county, regional, and state fund sources.
City staff time is required to manage and oversee the transportation impact study, design, community outreach, and the implementation of EBGWMM projects.
NEXT STEPS
Staff request feedback from the members of CIAC on the proposed alignment and facility types identified for the EBGWMM-Hayward Segment project. Following that direction, staff from the City and Alameda CTC will continue community outreach and concept design. Staff anticipate returning to CIAC and full Council in late 2025 to seek approval for one of the alternative concepts to move into the Environmental phase.
Prepared by: Jhay Delos Reyes/Kanda Raj, Alameda CTC
Lucas Woodward, Senior Transportation Engineer
Hugh Louch, Deputy Director of Public Works – Transportation Recommended by: Alex Ameri, Director of Public Works
Approved by:
________________________________
Dustin Claussen, Interim City Manager
Attachment II:
Existing and Proposed Sections
Montgomery Avenue (looking northbound)
Existing Conditions
Draft Recommendation
Recommendation: Bicycle Boulevard + Traffic Calming
• Additional traffic calming treatments recommended
to keep vehicle volumes low and reduce vehicle
s
peeds to 20 MPH or less
• Potential for Class IV bikeway between A St and B St
36’
53’
53’
36’
Existing Conditions:
Looking north past Smalley Ave
B Street (looking eastbound)
Existing Conditions
Draft Recommendation
Recommendation: Two-Way Class IV Bikeway
• Bikeway on south side of street next to BART
station
52’
76’
52’
76’
Existing Conditions:
Looking east approaching Montgomery Ave
Grand Street (looking northbound)
Existing Conditions
Draft Recommendation
Recommendation: One-Way Class IV Bikeway
• Road diet from 5 lanes to 3
• On-street parking maintained
63’
80’
62’
80’
Existing Conditions:
Looking north past D St
Meek Avenue (looking westbound)
Existing Conditions
Draft Recommendation
Recommendation: One-Way Class IV Bikeway
• Removes on-street parking on one side
42’
60’
46’
60’
Existing Conditions:
Looking west past Sutro St
Silva Avenue – Recommendation
(looking northbound)
Existing Conditions
Draft Recommendation
Recommendation: Bike Boulevard + Traffic Calming
• Pinch point north of Leighton St. to restrict through traffic but allow for bus service
• On-street parking maintained
• Additional traffic analysis and community engagement
needed in next phases of project
32’
48’
32’
48’
Existing Conditions:
Looking north approaching Thomas Ave
Silva Avenue – Alternative (looking northbound)
Existing Conditions
Alternative Concept
Alternative: Two-Way Class IV Bikeway
• Bike lanes do not meet minimum widths
• Loss of on-street parking
32’
48’
32’
48’
Existing Conditions:
Looking north approaching Thomas Ave
Sycamore Avenue (looking eastbound)
Existing Conditions
Draft Recommendation
Recommendation: Two-Way Class IV Bikeway
• Bikeway on north side of street
• Provides continuous bike facility around curve to
Whitman St
• On-street parking removed
33’
49’
33’
49’
Existing Conditions:
Looking east approaching Whitman St
Whitman Street north of Sorenson
(looking northbound)
Existing Conditions
Draft Recommendation
50’
38’
Recommendation: Two-Way Class IV Bikeway
• Bikeway on east side next to BART tracks
• Some on-street parking removed
Note: The cross section changes multiple times over this section, with right of way widths varying from 50 to 68 feet. The draft recommendation shown is based on most constrained segment, which is between Berry Ave and Harder Rd. 50’
38’
Existing Conditions:
Looking north approaching Berry Ave
Whitman Street south of Sorenson
(looking northbound)
Existing Conditions
Draft Recommendation
Recommendation: Two-Way Class IV Bikeway
• At Sorenson pedestrian bridge, bikeway switches from
east side of Whitman to west side
• Bikeway on west side next to Tennyson High and
Cesar Chavez Middle
46’
60’
46’
60’
Existing Conditions:
Looking north approaching Mason Dr
Tennyson Road (looking eastbound)
Existing Conditions
Draft Recommendation
Recommendation: Two-Way Class IV Bikeway
• Bikeway on south side of street next to BART
station
• Existing westbound bike lane to remain
• On-street parking removed on south side
84’
100’
35’ 35’
84’
100’
35’ 35’
Existing Conditions:
Looking east approaching Dixon St
Dixon Street (looking northbound)
Existing Conditions
Draft Recommendation
Recommendation: One-Way Class IV Bikeway
• Travel lanes narrowed to 11 feet
48’
62’
48’
62’
Existing Conditions:
Looking north approaching Tennyson Rd
CITY OF HAYWARD
Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
File #: ACT 24-080
DATE: October 23, 2024
TO: Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee FROM: Director of Public Works
SUBJECT
Proposed 2024/2025 Planning Calendar: Review and Comment
RECOMMENDATION
That the Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee (CIAC) reviews and comments on this report.
SUMMARY
The proposed 2024 agenda planning calendar contains planned agenda topics for the Committee meetings for the CI&AC’s consideration. This agenda item is included in every Council Infrastructure Committee agenda and reflects any modifications to the planning calendar, including additions, rescheduled items, and/or cancelled items.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I Staff Report
CITY OF HAYWARD Printed on 10/19/2024Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
DATE: October 23, 2024
TO: Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee
FROM: Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Proposed 2024/2025 Agenda Planning Calendar: Review and Comment
RECOMMENDATION
That the Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee (CIAC) reviews and comments on this report.
SUMMARY
The proposed 2024/2025 agenda planning calendar contains planned agenda topics for the Committee meetings for the CIAC’s consideration. This agenda item is included in every Council Infrastructure Committee agenda and reflects any modifications to the planning calendar, including additions, rescheduled items, and/or cancelled items.
DISCUSSION
The proposed 2024/2025 agenda planning calendar contains planned agenda topics for several future Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee meetings for the Committee’s consideration. This agenda item is included in every Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee agenda and reflects any modifications to the planning calendar, including additions, rescheduled items, and/or cancelled items.
Underlined – Staff recommends item to be added to Approved Agenda Planning Calendar
Strikeout - Staff recommends item to be removed or scheduled from previously Approved Planning Calendar.
December 25, 2024 ** Will need to poll for a meeting date
1. Approval of Minutes from October 23, 2024 Meeting
2. Santa Clara Street Traffic Calming Update
3. CARB Bike Voucher Program Update
4. Hayward Blvd Traffic Calming Update
5. CIP Oral Update
6. Review and Approve the 2025 Agenda Planning Calendar February 26, 2025 – Meeting Location: Hayward Executive Airport
1. Approval of Minutes from December Meeting
2. Vision Zero Speed Management Plan Update
3. Planning
4. Review and Approve the 2025 Agenda Planning Calendar April 23, 2025 – Meeting Location: Hayward City Hall
1. Approval of Minutes from February 26, 2025 Meeting
2. Orchard Traffic Calming Pilot Update
3. Safe Routes to School Infrastructure Design
4. Review and Approve the 2025 Agenda Planning Calendar Unscheduled
1. Receive Update on New CIP Project: Corporation Yard and Potential Funding Options (PW&U/Finance)
2. Review & Comment on Long-Range Planning for the Sewer System Upgrades
3. Phase IV of Hangar Repair Project update
NEXT STEPS
Upon consideration and approval by CIAC, staff will schedule items accordingly for future meetings.
Prepared by: Hugh Louch, Deputy Director of Public Works - Transportation Douglas McNeeley, Airport Manager
Recommended by: Alex Ameri, Director of Public Works
Approved by:
____________________________
Dustin Claussen, Interim City Manager