Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee
February 5, 2026

Council Infrastructure & Airport
Committee

CITY OF HAYWARD
Agenda
Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
Hybrid/Conference Room 2A5:30 PMThursday, February 5, 2026 Special Joint HARD Board and Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee Meeting
NOTICE: The Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee will hold a hybrid meeting at Hayward City Hall, 777 B Street, Hayward, CA, and via Zoom.

The PUBLIC COMMENT section provides an opportunity to address the Committee on items not listed on the agenda. The Committee welcomes comments and requests that speakers present their remarks in a respectful manner, within established time limits and focus on issues which directly affect the City or are within the jurisdiction of the City. As the Committee is prohibited by State law from discussing items not listed on the agenda, your item will be taken under consideration and may be referred to staff for further action. Speakers shall not use threatening, profane, or abusive language which disrupts, disturbs, or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of a Committee meeting. The City is committed to maintaining a workplace free of unlawful harassment and is mindful that City staff regularly attend Committee meetings. Discriminatory statements or conduct that is hostile, intimidating, oppressive, or abusive and disruptive to a meeting and will not be tolerated.

How to submit written Public Comment:

Send an email to [email protected] by 1:00 p.m. the day of the meeting.

Please identify the Agenda Item Number in the subject line of your email. Emails will be compiled into one file, distributed to the Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee and City staff, and Published in the City's Meeting and Agenda Center under Documents Received After Published Agenda.

1 February 5, 2026Council Infrastructure & Airport
Committee
Agenda
How to provide live Public Comment during the Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee Meeting:

1. Attend in person at the Hayward City Hall, 777 B Street, Hayward, Conference Room 2A

2. Please click the link below to join the Webinar:

Join from PC, Mac, iPad, or Android:
https://hayward.zoom.us/j/89540973480?
pwd=GuAbwXBW9ETGpeHYXo52w6e23WrC89.1
Passcode:CIAC_0205
Phone one-tap:
+16699006833,,89540973480#,,,,*848778067# US (San Jose) +16469313860,,89540973480#,,,,*848778067# US
Join via audio:
+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)
+1 646 931 3860 US
Webinar ID: 895 4097 3480
Passcode: 848778067
International numbers available: https://hayward.zoom.us/u/kdbQ4PZe6I

CALL TO ORDER

ROLL CALL
PUBLIC COMMENTS:

REPORTS/ACTION ITEMS
Joint Agency Discussion of La Vista Park Project and
Coordination Opportunities on Future Park Projects
RPT 26-0131.

Attachments: Attachment I Staff Report
Attachment II MOU
Attachment III MOU Amendment
Presentation

COMMITTEE MEMBER/STAFF ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REFERRALS

ADJOURNMENT

2 February 5, 2026Council Infrastructure & Airport
Committee
Agenda
Next Regular Meeting: Wednesday, February 25, 2026

3 CITY OF HAYWARD
Hayward City Hall
777 B Street
Hayward, CA 94541
www.Hayward-CA.gov
File #: RPT 26-013
DATE: February 5, 2026
TO: Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee, City of Hayward Capital Outlay Standing Committee, Hayward Area Recreation and Park District FROM: Director of Public Works
General Manager

SUBJECT
Joint Agency Discussion of La Vista Park Project and Coordination Opportunities on Future Park Projects

RECOMMENDATION
That the Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee (CAIC) hold a joint meeting with the Capital Outlay Standing Committee of the Hayward Area Recreation and Park District (HARD) Board to discuss the La Vista Park project and coordination opportunities on future park projects.

SUMMARY
Since 2017, the City and HARD have worked toward a shared vision of constructing and operating La Vista Park, a new destination park in South Hayward, east of the intersection of Mission Boulevard and Tennyson Road. The addition of a destination park will create a much-needed amenity and attraction for South Hayward, the City, and the entire region.

On June 17, 2025, City Council awarded the construction contract to DeSilva Gates LLC of Dublin, California, in the amount of $32,850,547. While construction has been postponed until Spring 2026 due to the rainy season, staff has undertaken cost-saving value engineering efforts to reduce construction costs by potentially up to $5.2 million while maintaining all park features, usability, and safety.

Both City and HARD staff are interested in discussing with CAIC and the Capital Outlay Standing Committee of the HARD Board the La Vista Park Project and other opportunities for coordination on future park projects.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I Staff Report
CITY OF HAYWARD Printed on 2/4/2026Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
4 File #:RPT 26-013
CITY OF HAYWARD Printed on 2/4/2026Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
5

DATE: February 5, 2026

TO: Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee, City of Hayward Capital Outlay Standing Committee, Hayward Area Recreation and Park District

FROM: Director of Public Works
General Manager

SUBJECT: Joint Agency Discussion of La Vista Park Project and Coordination Opportunities on Future Park Projects

RECOMMENDATION

That the Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee (CAIC) hold a joint meeting with the Capital Outlay Standing Committee of the Hayward Area Recreation and Park District (HARD) Board to discuss the La Vista Park project and coordination opportunities on future park projects.

SUMMARY

Since 2017, the City and HARD have worked toward a shared vision of constructing and operating La Vista Park, a new destination park in South Hayward, east of the intersection of Mission Boulevard and Tennyson Road. The addition of a destination park will create a much-needed amenity and attraction for South Hayward, the City, and the entire region.

On June 17, 2025, City Council awarded the construction contract to DeSilva Gates LLC of Dublin, California, in the amount of $32,850,547. While construction has been postponed until Spring 2026 due to the rainy season, staff has undertaken cost-saving value engineering efforts to reduce construction costs by potentially up to $5.2 million while maintaining all park features, usability, and safety.

Both City and HARD staff are interested in discussing with CAIC and the Capital Outlay Standing Committee of the HARD Board the La Vista Park Project and other opportunities for coordination on future park projects.

FISCAL IMPACT

The adopted FY26 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget includes a total project budget appropriation of $42.769 million (Fund 405 – Capital Projects (Governmental)) for 6

the design and construction of La Vista Park, including a $5.2M transfer from Measure C.

This transfer can be eliminated as discussed later in this report. As outlined below, HARD is contributing over $15 million in Bond funds to the project.

The breakdown for the project costs is as follows:

Construction Contract $32,850,547
Estimated Maximum Potential Value Engineering Cost Savings ($4,092,000) Construction Contingency $3,942,066
Construction Contingency Reduction ($1,108,000)
Construction Subtotal $31,592,613

Design $1,104,387
Administration $1,104,000
Geotechnical Inspection, Testing and Reporting $1,840,000 Previously Incurred City Costs $1,928,000
Total Project Cost $37,569,000

The funding sources for the project are as follows:

Fees for La Vista Development $2,140,000
HARD Bond Funds $15,400,000
Offsite Tree Mitigation $585,000
Park-in-Lieu Funds $19,444,000
Total Funding Sources $37,569,000

BACKGROUND

In 2005, the La Vista residential development included 179 new single-family homes to be built at the South Hayward site east of and up the hill from the terminus of Tennyson Road and Mission Boulevard was approved. The original project included the construction of a new approximately 30-acre public park. The original 30-acre park site on land donated by the developer was expanded to almost fifty acres in size by the addition of twenty acres of the former Caltrans Route 238 property right-of-way acquired by the City.

The adopted FY23 CIP budget included a total project budget appropriation of $23.27M (Fund 405) for the design and construction of the La Vista Park Project. In February 2023, the engineer’s estimated cost for construction of La Vista Park without contingency was $25M. With construction contingency, project design, administration, inspection and testing, the total estimated project cost was over $35M, which was greater than the appropriated budget. Staff prepared alternate bids with the bid package that would have allowed the project to be phased into multiple phases depending on how the bids were received. It was intended that at least the first phase would be awarded in 2023 to construct a majority of the park features and the subsequent phases would be constructed in the future when additional funding is obtained.

7

In June 2023, three (3) construction bids were received for the project ranging from $41,927,606 to $47,323,996. With the low bid far exceeding the available budget, the project was fiscally infeasible. As a result, City Council directed staff to reevaluate and revise the scope of the project to allow a project with a reduced scope to proceed and then rebid the project.

The final design of La Vista Park is a 39-acre site that incorporates the following items and park elements:

 Site grading and construction of the slope stabilization keyway  Installation of on-site utilities including water lines, sewer lines, and storm water lines
 Installation of new electrical service and infrastructure with pedestrian lights including infrastructure for the future security camera system by HARD  Installation of irrigation system, trees, and hydroseeding of the entire project site
 Installation of offsite asphalt and concrete sidewalk on Tennyson Road  Installation of the Foothill trail
 Installation of on-site asphalt, decomposed granite, and gravel paving  Installation of decorative boulders
 Installation of park signage, vehicular swing gates, and bollards  Installation of picnic tables, BBQs, benches, and trash and recycle receptacles  Installation of bike racks and drinking fountains
 Installation of turf sod at the soccer field and amphitheater  Installation of concrete slide structures, exercise equipment, play equipment, and basketball courts
 Installation of fencing for area separation
 Installation of automated restrooms and maintenance shed  Installation of a dog park

City staff presented the revised scope of La Vista Park Project to reduce both the scope and the cost to City Council on March 19, 2024. On April 1, 2024, a similar presentation was made to the HARD Board of Directors regarding the revisions made to the La Vista Park scope. The HARD Board of Directors requested execution of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between HARD and the City to solidify project funding, park operations, and maintenance, including capital replacement of park improvements.

Once the project re-design was complete, the project plans were routed to HARD for review. The MOU referenced above was executed in January 2025 and amended in July 2025 (Attachments 2 and 3, respectively).

Additionally, on December 17, 20241, City Council approved the plans and specifications for the project and called for construction bids to be received. On April 23, 2025, four bids were received with base bids ranging from $32,850,547 to $34,945,319. DeSilva

1 https://hayward.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=7059333&GUID=9822652E-85BA-4488-A872-8A02782DF6CA&Options=&Search= 8

Gates Construction (DGC) submitted the low bid in the amount of $32,850,547, which was 24.3% above the engineer's estimate of $26,437,784. Due to the number of bids received and the narrow range among them, staff determined that the bids are reasonable and reflective of current market conditions.

In evaluating the bid, City staff recommended to allocate Measure C funds to cover the additional construction costs related to the keyway in order to move the project forward towards construction. At the time of award, City staff had the full intention of partnering with the selected contractor to perform value engineering related to the keyway and therefore, substantially reduce and, ideally, eliminate the Measure C contribution of $5.2M to the Project. Value engineering would seek performing the construction work in a way to reduce the cost without impacting the features and quality of the final project.

However, in order to start negotiating with the low bidder on any value engineering, the City needed to award the project to the low bidder first.

On June 17, 2025, City Council awarded the construction contract to DGC in the amount of $32,850,547 and authorizing an Administrative Construction Contingency budget of $3,942,066, for a total not-to-exceed contract amount of $36,792,613.

DISCUSSION

After the construction contract was awarded to DGC, staff engaged DGC and the project design team, including Geotechnical Engineer Langan, in value engineering discussions.

These efforts were focused on achieving cost reductions without impacting the City’s General Fund or Measure C while preserving all park features, usability, and safety elements approved by City Council. Through multiple design iterations, the slope stability keyway was revised to a wider section and eliminated the need for geogrid and cement treatment. The permeable material within the keyway was also replaced with a more efficient and lower-cost alternative. In addition, the contractor revised its intended means and methods for keyway construction to improve production efficiency for an estimated savings of $600,000. This amount remains preliminary and will be finalized following verification of subsurface soil conditions and approval by the Geotechnical engineer.

To further reduce the impact to the City’s General Fund, the Construction Contingency has been reduced by $1,108,000, from $3,942,066 to $2,834,066, or approximately 10% of the Revised Construction Contract. This is still a reasonable amount given the extensive discussion with the contractor and the project’s Geotechnical engineer.

Staff is continuing discussions with DGC to finalize the cost savings. The anticipated measures and corresponding revisions to the construction contract are summarized below.

Original Construction Contract $32,850,547
Original Construction Contingency $3,942,066
Original Total Construction Cost $36,792,613

Eliminate Geogrid and Cement Treatment ($3,007,000)
9

Substitute Permeable Material ($485,000)
Alternate Keyway Construction Method ($600,000)
Cost Savings Subtotal ($4,092,000)

Construction Contingency Reduction ($1,108,000)

Revised Construction Contract $28,758,547
Revised Construction Contingency $2,834,066
Revised Total Construction Cost $31,592,613

Estimated Total Project Cost Savings $5,200,000
 Subject to further review by the Project’s Geotech engineer.

Following finalization of the project cost savings, staff will schedule the pre-construction meeting. Construction is anticipated to start after the conclusion of the rainy season and will include ongoing participation and coordination with HARD staff. In addition to the value engineering discussions, staff and DGC have initiated the contract growing process for approximately 1,100 trees planned for La Vista Park.

Potential Grant Funding Opportunity

The upcoming Statewide Park Development and Community Revitalization Grant Program is administered by California Department of Parks and Recreation. City staff recently learned that La Vista Park Project may be eligible for up to $8.5M in grant funding for the new park construction. City staff will be coordinating closely with HARD staff on the grant.

For example, this grant opportunity could allow for enhanced amenities or the construction of three shade trellis structures that were included in the project as bid alternatives but not awarded due to budget constraints. Or, this grant could be used for a completely different park project, which will be coordinated closely with HARD staff. The grant application deadline is anticipated to be around summer or fall 2026 so delaying the start of the construction activities to after the rainy season may have helped in making the La Vista Park a competitive possibility for the grant. City and HARD staff will collaborate on the pursuit of this grant when more information is available in the coming months.

Coordination Opportunities on Future Park Projects

HARD is planning numerous future park and trail projects throughout the City of Hayward, including the Foothill Trail, Parcel Group 8 land transfer, and Eden Greenway project, among others. This joint session is an opportunity for both City and HARD committee members to discuss these future opportunities and provide feedback and direction to staff.

ECONOMIC IMPACT

The addition of a destination park to the South Hayward community will create a much- needed amenity and attraction for this part of the City. This will likely result in increased visitors to the area as well as more dollars spent on local businesses. In addition, there have 10

been numerous studies that indicate that the addition of open space or parkland has a positive impact on home values in the surrounding areas.

STRATEGIC ROADMAP

This agenda item supports the Strategic Roadmap of Invest in Infrastructure. Specifically, this item relates to the implementation of the following project:

Project N14, Part N14b: Construct La Vista Park

SUSTAINABILITY FEATURES

The La Vista Park has been designed to be among the most environmentally sustainable park within the City. As part of the design, park areas will require less irrigation and native grass and plants will be used throughout the park. Park structures will be constructed from natural materials rather than traditional fabricated structures. Bio- retention filtration areas will collect and retain stormwater runoff prior to discharging into the storm drainage system.

PUBLIC CONTACT

After construction work for the La Vista Park Project has been scheduled, signs will be posted prior to commencement of work indicating the date and time of construction activities.

NEXT STEPS

The following schedule has been developed for this project:

Begin Construction Spring 2026
Complete Construction Fall 2027

Prepared by: Sammy Lo, Senior Civil Engineer

Reviewed by: Dave Hung, Acting Deputy Director of Public Works

Recommended by: Alex Ameri, Director of Public Works

Approved by:

Jennifer Ott, City Manager
11 HARDRevisions: 12-04-24
Page1of 14
Memorandum of Understanding
between City of Hayward and Hayward Area Recreation and Park District For the La Vista Park Project
ThisMemorandumofUnderstanding (“MOU”), effectivethis dayof , 2025 (the “EffectiveDate”) isbetweentheCityofHayward (“City”), amunicipalcorporationoftheStateofCalifornia, andtheHaywardAreaRecreationandParkDistrict (“HARD”), aCaliforniaspecialdistrict, hereinafterreferredtoindividuallyasa “Party” andcollectivelyas “Parties”, forthedesign, construction, funding, operationandmaintenanceofLaVistaParkinHayward, California.

RECITALS
WHEREAS, in2005, CityapprovedtheLaVistaresidentialdevelopmentinsouthHayward, onTennysonRoadandMissionBoulevard, thatincludedtheconstructionof179newsingle-familyhomes (the “ResidentialDevelopment”); and WHEREAS, thedeveloperoftheResidentialDevelopmentdonatedthirty (30) acresoflandadjacenttotheResidentialDevelopmenttobeusedforthedevelopmentofanewpublicparkforthesouthHaywardcommunityandTwoMillionDollars ($2,000,000.00) forsuchpurpose (the “DeveloperFeeContribution”); and WHEREAS, in2018, thesizeoftheproposedparkexpandedtoalmost50acresoflandwiththeCity’sacquisitionofformerCaliforniaDepartmentofTransportation (“CalTrans”) right-of-waylandfromtheformerRoute238bypassproject; and WHEREAS, thesizeoftheproposedparkwassubsequentlyreducedbyapproximatelyeleven (11) acresoflandtoaddressfundingconstraints, thusresultinginthesizeoftheproposedparkatapproximatelythirty-nine (39) acresoflandasshownasthe “ParkProperty” on theProjectSiteMap, attachedheretoasExhibit “ A” andincorporatedherein; and WHEREAS, theproposedparkistoincludeanumberofparkandrecreationalfacilities, includingsportsfields, courts, ayogalawn, hikingtrails, andamphitheater, amongotheramenities (collectively, the “ParkImprovements”), andapproximatelysixteen (16) acresofopenspace (collectively, the “ParkProject” or “Project”), allasshownontheParkProjectConceptualplan, whichisattachedheretoasExhibit “ B” andincorporatedhereinbyreference, whichwasapprovedbytheHaywardCityCouncilonOctober30, 2017; and WHEREAS, inMarch2019, CityenteredintoaprofessionalservicesagreementwithSurfaceDesign, Inc. (the “ProjectArchitect”) forthedesignoftheParkProjectandthepreparationofplansandspecificationsfortheconstructionoftheParkImprovements; and WHEREAS, inSeptember28, 2021, theHaywardCityCouncilapprovedthefinaldesignoftheParkProjectandconfirmedthatnofurtheractionundertheCaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct (“CEQA”) actionwasrequiredaftertheaddendumtotheoriginal Docusign Envelope ID: 6EC23AE8- C836- 4E89- 9408- EB00B2D1C994 29th
January
Attachment II
12 HARDRevisions: 12-04-24
Page2of14
InitialStudy/MitigatedNegativeDeclarationwaspreparedandreviewedandapprovedbytheHaywardCityCouncilin2005; and WHEREAS, CityinitiallybidtheconstructionoftheParkImprovementsin2023, butrejectedallbidsbecausetheyexceededtheavailablefundingfortheprojectandsubsequentlyreducedthescopeoftheParkImprovements; and WHEREAS, theProjectwillcreateamuch-neededamenityandattractionforthesouthHaywardcommunity, atraditionallylow-incomeandunderservedserviceareaofHayward, byimprovingaccesstohighqualityparkandopenspaces, enhancingqualityoflifeforresidents, increasingpropertyvalues, attractingvisitors, andhelpingeconomicgrowthforlocalbusiness; and WHEREAS, CityandHARDdesiretocollaborateonthedesign, funding, construction, operationandmaintenanceoftheProject; and WHEREAS, Chapter4ofDivision5oftheCaliforniaPublicResourcesCodeauthorizesandempowersanycityandrecreationdistricttocooperatewitheachotherandtothatendenterintoagreementswitheachotherforthepurposeofestablishingcommunityrecreationprogramsandfacilities, includingwithoutlimitationthisMOU, subjecttoapprovalorratificationbyHARD’sBoardofDirectorsandtheCity’sCityCouncil.

NOW, THEREFORE, inconsiderationofthecovenantsandconditionshereinaftercontained, itismutuallyagreedbyandbetweenCityandHARDasfollows:

AGREEMENT

1. Park Project Generally. ThepurposeofthisMOUistosetforththetermsandconditionsforthedesign, funding, construction, operationandthemaintenanceoftheParkProjectandParkImprovements. Asfurthersetforthherein, CitywillberesponsibleforthedesignoftheimprovementswithinputfromHARD, thebiddingandconstructionoftheimprovementsandclose-outphasesoftheconstructionoftheimprovements. HARDwillberesponsiblefortheoperation, management, maintenance, andrepairoftheParkImprovements. ThefundingoftheconstructionoftheimprovementswillbesharedbetweenthePartiesassetforthherein. 2. Term. TheTermofthisMOUshallcommenceontheEffectiveDate, andshallexpire, unlessterminatedearlyorextendedasprovidedherein, onthetwenty-fifth (25th) anniversaryoftherecordingofaNoticeofCompletionoftheconstructionoftheParkImprovements. TheTermmaybeextendedbyagreementofthePartiesanddocumentedasanamendmenttothisMOU. CityagreesthatifthisMOUisterminatedearlierthan2046, thenCity, pursuanttotheHARDMeasureF1Bondtax-exemptrequirements, asfurtherdiscussedbelow, willcontinuetousetheParkImprovementsforrecreationalpurposesuntilatleast2046 (theendoftheBondTerm) andthatitwillnotturnoversubstantialcontroloftheParkProjecttoanon-governmentalentityduringtheBondTerm.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6EC23AE8- C836- 4E89- 9408- EB00B2D1C994 13 HARDRevisions: 12-04-24
Page3of14

3. Funding of Construction of Park Project Improvements. a) Park In-Lieu Fees. ThePartiesagreethatCitywillallocateThirteenMillionDollars ($13,000,000.00) inaccumulatedparkin-lieufees (QuimbyActfees) collectedbyCityasoftheEffectiveDatefromcertainresidentialdevelopmentprojectsinthecommunitiestobeservedbytheParkProperty, including, butnotlimitedto, theDeveloperFeeContribution (“ParkIn-LieuFees”). Inaddition, andasfurthersetforthinSection3(d), below, thePartiesagreethatCitywillallocateSixMillion, SevenHundredThousandDollars ($6,700,000.00) ofexistingand/orfutureparkin-lieufeescollectedbyCityfromdevelopersofresidentialdevelopmentprojectsincommunitiestobeservedbytheParkPropertytoHARDasareimbursementofaportionofHARD’sfinancialcontributiontotheProjectasdescribedinSection3(c), below. b) City Financial Contribution. CityagreestoallocateatotalofFiveMillion, SevenHundredEighty-FiveThousandDollars ($5,785,000.00) fromseparateCityfundsfortheconstructionoftheParkImprovements, consistingofFiveMillion, TwoHundredThousandDollars ($5,200,000.00) ofMeasureCfundsandFiveHundredEighty-FiveThousandDollars ($585,000.00) ofoff-sitetreemitigationfunds (collectively, the “CityFunds”). AsanadditionalCityfinancialcontributiontotheParkProject, asoftheEffectiveDateCityhasincurredOneMillion, NineHundredTwenty-EightThousand ($1,928,000.00) incostsrelatedtodesignconsultants, geotechnicalandenvironmentalstudiesandParkProjectadministrativecosts. Cityshall, withinfifteen (15) daysoftheEffectiveDate, providetoHARD, forHARD’sreview, copiesofdocumentationofpreviouslyincurredCityprojectcosts. c) HARD Financial Contribution. HARDagreestoallocateatotalofFifteenMillion, FourHundredThousandDollars ($15,400,000.00) inMeasureF1BondfundsforthedesignandconstructionoftheParkImprovements (“HARDFunds”). TheuseofMeasureF1Bondfundsissubjecttotherestrictionsofthetermsandconditionsfortheissuanceofthebondswhichinclude, butarenotlimitedto, therequirementthatimprovementsfundedbythesebondsmustbeusedforrecreationalpurposesduringtheBondTerm, oruntil2046, andthattheimprovementscannotbeoperatedorleasedtoaprivatepartyduringtheBondTerm. HARDwilltransfertheHARDFundsonareimbursementbasistoCityuponCity’srequestsupportedbydocumentationofProjectcostsasfurthersetforthinSection8, below. HARDisnotobligatedtoprovidefurtherfundingforthedesignandconstructionoftheParkImprovementsotherthanasprovidedinthisSection3(c). d) Reimbursement of HARD Financial Contribution. AsdescribedinSection3(a) above, thePartiesagreethatCitywillallocateSixMillion, SevenHundredThousandDollars ($6,700,000.00) ofexistingand/orfutureparkin-lieufeescollectedbyCityfromdevelopersofeligibleresidentialdevelopmentprojectsinthecommunitiestobeservedbytheParkPropertytoHARDasareimbursementofaportionofHARD’stotalfinancialcontributiontotheProject (the “ReimbursementAmount”). ForanyresidentialdevelopmentsinthecommunitiestobeservedbytheParkPropertyforwhichparkin-lieufeesaretobecollectedaftertheEffectiveDate, Cityshall, upontheapprovalofa Docusign Envelope ID: 6EC23AE8- C836- 4E89- 9408- EB00B2D1C994 14 HARDRevisions: 12-04-24
Page4of14
buildingpermitforsuchdevelopment, inadditiontoitsotherobligationsundertheQuimbyAct, notifyHARDinwritingofsuchdevelopmentandtheamountofparkin-lieufeestobecollectedtherefrom. Uponthereceiptoftheparkin-lieufees, CityshallpaytoHARDtheamountoffeescollectedasaportionoftheReimbursementAmount. AnysuchreimbursementshallbedocumentedinwritingandthePartiesshallkeeparecordofthereimbursementpaymentsmadetoHARD. ThePartiesmayalsoagreetotheCity’stransferofexistingunallocatedparkin-lieufeestoHARDforparkprojectsasapartoftheReimbursementAmount. ItisintendedthatHARDwillbepaidtheReimbursementAmountwithinten (10) yearsofthedateoftheEffectiveDate. IfHARDisnotfullyreimbursedbythatdate, thentheunpaidportionoftheReimbursementAmountonthatdateshallbeincreasedbyinterestatrateoftheconsumerpriceindexforallurbanconsumers (“CPI”), compoundedannually, commencingonthedate10yearsfromtheEffectiveDate. OnceHARDhasreceivedthefullReimbursementAmount, thenCitywillhavenofurtherobligationunderthisSection3(d). HARDshallhavefulldiscretioninitsuseofthefundsreceivedfromCityunderthisMOU, providedthatsuchfundsshallonlybeusedforparklandacquisitionorparkimprovements. ThissubsectionshallsurvivetheearlyterminationofthisMOU. e) Summary of Total Available Funding.

ParkIn-LieuFeeAllocation $13,000,000.00CityofHaywardContribution $5,785,000.00CityPreviouslyIncurredCosts $1,928,000.00HARDContribution $15,400,000.00Total $ 36,113,000.004. Project Costs Estimate. CityhasworkedwiththeProjectArchitecttodevelopacostestimate (shownbelow) ofthetotalhardandsoftcostsanticipatedtobeincurredintheconstructionoftheParkImprovementsbasedontheConceptualPlanasshownbelow: ConstructionofReducedScopePark $25,460,000ConstructionContingency (12%) $ 3,055,200 ConstructionSubtotal $ 28,515,200
Design $ 1,996,064Administration $1,392,520GeotechnicalInspection, TestingandReporting $2,281,216PreviouslyIncurredCityCosts $ 1,928,000TotalProjectCost $ 36,113,0005. Project Budget. Cityshall, withtheassistanceoftheProjectArchitectandconsideringanyinformationprovidedbyHARD, prepareadetailprojectbudgetshowingtheestimatedcostsoftheconstructionoftheoverallParkImprovementsandtheamountoftheconstructioncontingenciesandprojectfees (the “ProposedProjectBudget”) andprovideittoHARDwithinthirty (30) daysoftheEffectiveDate. HARDshallprovideanyproposedchangestoCitywithinfifteen (15) daysthereafter. HARD’sfailuretoprovide Docusign Envelope ID: 6EC23AE8- C836- 4E89- 9408- EB00B2D1C994 15 HARDRevisions: 12-04-24
Page5of14
aresponsewithinthe15-dayperiodshallbedeemedHARD’sapprovaloftheProposedBudget. CityshallconsideranyHARDrequestedchangestotheProposedBudgetexceptchangesthatmateriallyincreasethetotalcostoftheProject, thatrequireachangetotheConceptualPlanorthatareinconsistentwiththetermsherein. CityandHARDshallapprovetheagreeduponbudget (the “ProjectBudget”). CityshallberesponsiblefortheadministrationoftheProjectBudget, butanychangestotheProjectBudgetshallbeagreeduponbybothParties. 6. Eligible Project Costs. ThefollowingcostsandexpensesmaybefundedwithParkIn-LieuFees, HARDFundsandCityFunds (collectively, “ProjectFunds”) ascontainedintheProjectBudget, andtotheextentnotprohibitedbyapplicablelaw: a) projectcontractorcostsassociatedwithdirectProjectconstruction, coordination, andsupport; b) fundsexpendedinpreparationofProjectdesign, architectural, civil, andgeotechnicalservices; c) sitepreparationcosts; d) fundsspenttoconstructtheProjectincludingbutnotlimitedtocontingencyamountsunderanyProjectcontractoragreement; e) constructionmanagement, fieldinspectionandmaterialtestingcosts; andf) othercostsasmutuallyagreeduponinwritingbyHARDandCity. 7. Administrative Costs. Exceptasotherwiseprovidedherein, eachPartyshallberesponsibleforitsownadministrativecostsincurredortobeincurredinconnectionwithitsroleintheParkProject, includingbutnotnecessarilylimitedtostafftime, andsuchcostsshallnotconstituteEligibleProjectCosts. EachPartyacknowledgesthatbyparticipatingindesign, construction, operationandmaintenanceoftheParkProject, itwillincurasignificantanduncompensatedinvestmentofstafftimeandattorneyresources. 8. Disbursements of HARDFunds. a) Prerequisites to Disbursement of HARD Funds. SubjecttothetermsandconditionsofthisMOU, HARDshallmakeeachdisbursementofHARDFundstoCityfordepositinaseparateaccountestablishedbytheCitysothatsuchfundsshallbeavailableforpaymentofEligibleProjectCostsassuchcostsareincurredbyCity. CityshallberesponsibleforthepaymentoffundstoallProjectcontractorsforEligibleProjectCosts.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6EC23AE8- C836- 4E89- 9408- EB00B2D1C994 16 HARDRevisions: 12-04-24
Page6of14
b) Disbursements of HARD Funds. DisbursementsofHARDFundsshallbemadewithinten (10) businessdaysafterreceiptofawrittendisbursementrequestfromCitywhichshallbeaccompaniedby: 1) City’sWrittenStatement. AwrittenstatementfromCitycertifiedbyCity’sauthorizedrepresentativetobetrueandcorrect, whichincludesallofthefollowing: (i) theamountspreviouslypaidtoeachProjectcontractortowhomtheEligibleProjectCostsareowed; (ii) theamountscurrentlyrequestedforpaymentbyeachsuchProjectcontractor; (iii) anybalancesdueoranticipatedtobecomeduetoeachsuchProjectcontractor; (iv) abriefdescriptionoftheEligibleProjectCostsasdefinedabove; and (v) confirmationthattheprimeorgeneralconstructioncontractor’sperformancebondhasbeenpostedandhasnotbeenwithdrawn, terminatedorbecomeunenforceable; 2) WaiversofLiens, Affidavits, andReleasesofLiens. Waiversofliens, affidavits, andreleasesoflienswithrespecttothelaborandmaterialswhicharethesubjectofthecurrentdisbursementrequest; 3) CityandProjectArchitectAcknowledgement. AnacknowledgementbyCitystaffandtheProjectArchitectcertifyingthatworkforwhichHARDFundshavebeenrequestedhasbeencompletedandmaterialsareinplaceasindicatedinthecurrentdisbursementrequest; and4) DocumentationofCosts. CopiesofProjectcontractorrequestsforpaymentorreimbursementofcostsandinvoicesandanyotherdocumentationofpaymentstobemadetoProjectcontractors. 9. Completion Report. PromptlyfollowingacceptanceoftheconstructionoftheParkImprovements, CitywillprepareandsubmittoHARDapost-completionaccountingofallProjectcostsandexpenses, includingallexpendituresofHARDFundsandCityFunds. HARDreservestherighttoindependentlyauditallProjectcostsandexpensesandtheexpenditureofHARDFundsandCityFunds. CityagreestocooperateinanysuchauditandprovideaccesstoHARDand/oritsauditorsofCity’saccountingdocumentsandallotherProjectdocuments. 10. Construction Drawings and Construction Contract. a) General Requirements. Thedesign, materials, andlocationoftheParkImprovementshavebeenandshallcontinuetobesubjecttoreviewandinputbymutualagreementofCityandHARD. CityshalldirecttheProjectArchitecttocompletethedesignoftheParkImprovementsandanyadditionalorsupplementalsiteplans, designdocuments, landscapingplans, drawings, plansandspecifications (includinganyvalueengineeringmodificationsasmaybe Docusign Envelope ID: 6EC23AE8- C836- 4E89- 9408- EB00B2D1C994 17 HARDRevisions: 12-04-24
Page7of14
mutuallyagreeduponbytheParties) andanyotherdocumentationonwhichProjectcontractorsshallrelyinconnectionwithdevelopmentoftheProject (collectively "ConstructionDrawings"). TheConstructionDrawingsshallimplementandbeconsistentwiththeConceptualPlan, unlessotherwiseagreedtobytheParties. b) HARD Review of Construction Drawings. Cityshallprovidethedraftdrawingsatonehundredpercent (100%) schematicdesign, onehundredpercent (100%) designdevelopment, andonehundredpercent (100%) ConstructionDocuments. HARDshallprovidecomments, ifany, withinten (10) businessdaysofreceipt. CityshallincorporateanychangesreasonablyrequestedbyHARDintotheConstructionDrawings, unlesssuchchangesareinconsistentwiththeConceptualPlan, thisMOU, ormateriallyincreasetheProjectcosts. c) Construction Contract. CityshallcontractwithaprimeorgeneralcontractorfortheconstructionoftheParkImprovements (the "ConstructionContractor") andshallcontractwithsuchothercontractorsandconsultantstoperformworkontheParkProjectasidentifiedintheProjectBudget (collectively “OtherProjectContractors”). CityshallprovidethedraftconstructioncontractandallsupportingdocumentsfortheconstructionoftheParkImprovementswiththeConstructionContractor (the “ConstructionContract”) toHARDforreviewandcomment. HARDshallproviderequestedchangestoCitywithinfifteen (15) daysofreceiptofthedraftConstructionContractfromCity. HARD’sfailuretoproviderequestedchangeswithinthe15-daycommentperiodshallbedeemedHARD’sapprovalofthedraftConstructionContract. CityshallincorporateHARD’srequestedchangestothecontractunlesssuchchangesarenotconsistentwiththeConceptualPlans, theConstructionDocumentsand/orthetermsandconditionshereinormateriallyincreasethecostoftheconstructionoftheParkImprovements. CityshallprovidetoHARDacopyoftheConstructionContractenteredintowiththeConstructionContractor. 11. Observation During Construction. CityagreestoallowHARD'sauthorizedrepresentatives, agentsandemployeesreasonableaccesstotheParkPropertytoobservetheconstructionoftheParkImprovements. HARDshallprovidetwenty-four (24) hourspriorwrittennoticeofitsentranceontotheParkProperty. 12. General Construction Standards. AllworkdoneinconnectionwithconstructionoftheProjectshallbeperformedbytheConstructionContractorpursuanttotheConstructionContractandsuchamendmentstheretoasreviewedandagreeduponbyHARD. AllProjectdesignandconstructionworkshallbeperformedbylicensedcontractors, engineersorarchitects, asapplicable. AllsuchworkshallbeconductedinaprofessionalfashioninaccordancewithConstructionDrawingsandincompliancewithallapplicablelocal, stateandfederalstatutes, codes, ordinances, laws, rules, regulationsandorders, includingtheAmericanswithDisabilitiesActandtheCaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct (“CEQA”) andanyrules, regulationsorordersissuedorpromulgatedbyany Docusign Envelope ID: 6EC23AE8- C836- 4E89- 9408- EB00B2D1C994 18 HARDRevisions: 12-04-24
Page8of14
governmentalagencywithjurisdictionovertheProjectortheParkProperty (collectively, "ApplicableLaws"). 13. Insurance Requirements. CityandtheConstructionContractorandOtherProjectContractors (collectivelyforthepurposesofthisSection13, “ProjectContractors”) shallmaintainacommercialgeneralliabilitypolicyintheamountofatleastTwoMillionDollars ($2,000,000.00) combinedsinglelimit, orsuchotherpolicylimitasCitymayapproveorrequireinitsreasonablediscretion, includingcoverageforbodilyinjury, propertydamage, products, completedoperationsandcontractualliabilitycoverage. Suchpolicyorpoliciesshallbewrittenonanoccurrencebasis. a) CityshallrequireProjectarchitects, landscapearchitects, engineersandotherdesignprofessionalstomaintainprofessionalliabilityinsuranceinanamountnotlessthanOneMillionDollars ($1,000,000.00). b) AllProjectContractorsworkingonbehalfofCityshallmaintaincomprehensiveautomobileliabilitycoverageintheamountofatleastOneMillionDollars ($1,000,000.00), combinedsinglelimitincludingcoverageforownedandnon-ownedvehicles. c) AllProjectContractorsshallobtainandmaintainWorkers’ CompensationInsuranceasrequiredunderStatelaw. d) CompanieswritingtheinsurancerequiredhereundershallbelicensedtodobusinessintheStateofCalifornia. InsuranceshallbeplacedwithinsurerswithacurrentA.M. Best’sratingofnolessthanA: VII. ThecommercialgeneralliabilityandcomprehensiveautomobilepoliciesrequiredhereundershallnameHARDandCityasanadditionalinsuredparty. 14. Notice of Completion. UponcompletionofconstructionoftheParkImprovementsandCity’sandHARD’sacceptancethereof, CityshallfileorcausetobefiledintheOfficialRecordsofAlamedaCountyanoticeofcompletionwithrespecttothesubjectwork (the "NoticeofCompletion"). CityshallprovideHARDwithacopyofthefiledNoticeofCompletionwithinfive (5) daysfilingthedateoffiling. 15. Guaranty and Warranty/ Bonds. CityshallobtainaguarantyfromProjectContractorsthattheParkImprovementsshallperformsatisfactorilyforaperiodofnotlessthantwo (2) yearsfromandafterthedateCityandHARDaccepttheProjectandParkImprovementsascomplete. Followingexpirationofthewarrantiesandguaranties (orintheabsenceofcoveragethereunder), thecostsofundertakinganyrepairstoorreplacementoftheParkProjectorParkImprovementsshallbegovernedbythetermsofthisMOUassetforthinSection19, below. TheConstructionContractshallrequiretheConstructionContractortopostandmaintainthroughouttheconstructionoftheProjectperformanceandpaymentbondsapplicabletosimilarconstructionprojects.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6EC23AE8- C836- 4E89- 9408- EB00B2D1C994 19 HARDRevisions: 12-04-24
Page9of14

16. Promotion and Advertising. EachPartymayengageinpromotingoradvertisingtheconstructionoftheParkProject. AnysuchpromotionoradvertisementshallindicatethattheprojectisjointlyfundedbyCityandHARD. 17. Signage. ThePartiesmayagreetopostasignorsignsontheParkPropertyduringconstructionoftheProjectthatstates, amongotherthings, thattheProjectisjointlyfundedbyHARDandCity. HARD’sandCity’slogomaybeaffixedtothesign(s). Anysuchsign(s) shallberemoveduponthecompletionoftheconstructionoftheParkImprovements. Thereafter, asignorsignsshallbepostedatthePropertywhichidentifiestheParkProjectas “LaVistaPark,” statesthatitwasjointlyfundedbyHARDandCity, includesHARD’sandCity’slogo (ofapproximatelythesamesize), andsuch, otherinformationasagreedonbytheParties. ThePartiesshallalsoagreeonthelocationoftheplacementofthesign(s). Thecostoftheconstructionandmaintenanceofthesign(s) shallbeevenlysharedbytheParties. Anysuchsign(s) mayberemovedupontheexpirationoftheTermortheearlierterminationhereof. 18. Title to Land and Improvements. CityshallretaintitletotheParkProperty. TheParkImprovementsshallbeownedbyHARD. UponexpirationoftheTermandanyextensionthereof, ortheearlierterminationhereofanduponCity’spaymenttoHARDasapplicableandasprovidedinSection20(c), below, HARDshallrecordaquitclaimdeed, orsimilarinstrument, againsttheParkPropertythustransferringitsownershipinterestintheParkImprovementstoCity. Thereafter, HARDshallhavenoright, interestorcontroloftheParkImprovements. Notwithstandingtheforegoing, HARDshallhavetherighttousetheParkImprovementsandtoaccess, occupy, useandmanagetheParkPropertyuponwhichtheyaresituatedduringthetermssetforthinthisMOU. 19. Accessto Park Property and Operation of Park. a) Access to Park Property and Operation of Park. UponCity’sandHARD’sacceptanceoftheParkImprovementsandtherecordingoftheNoticeofCompletion, theParkPropertyandParkImprovementsshallbeconsidered “after-acquiredproperty” asdefinedintheMasterAgreementandLease (“MasterAgreement) forHaywardParkSitesbetweenHARDandtheCity, datedJuly1, 2023, andshallbesubjecttoalltermsandprovisionsthereof, exceptasotherwiseprovidedherein, asofthedatetheHaywardCityCouncildesignatesinclusionoftheParkPropertyandParkImprovementsintheMasterAgreementbyresolution. HARD’srightofaccesstotheParkPropertyandtheoperation, managementandmaintenanceoftheParkPropertyandParkImprovementsshallbefortheTermhereofandanyextensionthereof. IftheMasterAgreementexpiresoristerminatedpriortotheendoftheTermhereof, thentheapplicabletermsandconditionsoftheMasterAgreementshallremainapplicabletothisMOU, exceptasotherwiseagreedtoinwritingbytheParties. b) Maintenance of Park Property and Park Improvements. ConsistentwiththeprovisionsoftheMasterAgreement, HARDshallberesponsible, atitscosts, forthemaintenanceoftheParkPropertyandtheParkImprovementsinthesame Docusign Envelope ID: 6EC23AE8- C836- 4E89- 9408- EB00B2D1C994 20 HARDRevisions: 12-04-24
Page10of14
mannerthatitmaintainsitsotherparksandparkfacilitiespursuanttotheapprovedParkMaintenanceStandardsasadoptedbytheHARDBoardofDirectors, astheymaybeamendedfromtimetotime. Maintenanceshallincludecleaningandmaintainingincludingminorrepairs, cleaningdrains, andcontractingforanyservicesnecessarytomaintaintheprojectareainitsentirety. HARDshallberesponsibleforthemaintenanceandcleaningofallequipment, amenitiesandfacilitieswithintheParkPropertyincludingirrigationofallinstalledtreesandlandscaping, andopenspacefireabatement. HARDshallberesponsibleforprocuringandpayingforallutilitiesfurnishedtotheParkPropertyandParkImprovements. c) Capital Replacement. CapitalReplacementshallmeantherepairorreplacementofanyParkImprovementwithacostthereofinexcessofTwenty-fiveThousandDollars ($25,000.00), increasedannuallyatthepercentagechangeoftheCPI. ForanyCapitalReplacement, thePartiesshallmeetandconferonthesharingoffundingofthecostofthework, theprocesstoretainacontractortoperformtheworkandtheschedulingoftheworksoastominimizethedisruptionoftheuseoftheParkPropertyandtheParkImprovements. 20. Termination/ Events of Default. a) Termination. EitherPartymayterminatethisMOUuponthirty (30) days’ writtennoticefollowingtheotherParty’sfailuretocureanEventofDefault, asdefinedbelow. Uponanysuchtermination, HARDshallremoveallofitsequipment, tools, materials, vehiclesandotherpersonalpropertyownedbyHARDfromtheParkPropertyandreturnanykeys, fobsorotheraccessmechanismstoCity. UponterminationbyCityforanuncuredHARDdefault, HARDshallrecordthequitclaimdeedsetforthinSection18, above. UponterminationbyHARDforanuncuredCitydefault, CityshallmakethepaymenttoHARDasrequiredinSection20(c), below, ifany. b) Events of Default. FailurebyeitherPartytoperformanymaterialactionorcovenantrequiredbythisMOU, withinthetimeperiodsprovidedhereinfollowingnoticeandexpirationoftheapplicablecureperioddescribedbelow, shallconstitutean “EventofDefault.” APartyclaiminganEventofDefaultshallgivewrittennoticeofdefaulttotheotherPartyspecifyingtheEventofDefaultcomplainedof. ExceptasotherwiseexpresslyprovidedinthisMOU, theotherPartyshallnotbeindefaultif (a) inthecaseofamonetarydefault, thedefaultingPartycuresthedefaultwithinten (10) daysfollowingreceiptofthenoticeofdefault, or (b) inthecaseofanon-monetarydefault, thedefaultingPartyfullycures, correctsorremediesthedefaultwithinsixty (60) daysfollowingreceiptofsuchnoticeofdefaultor, ifthenon-monetarydefaultcannotbecuredwithinthirty (30) days, thedefaultingPartycommencestocurethedefaultwithinsuchthirty (30)-dayperiodandthereafterdiligentlyandcontinuouslyprosecutessuchcuretocompletion.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6EC23AE8- C836- 4E89- 9408- EB00B2D1C994 21 HARDRevisions: 12-04-24
Page11of14
c) City Default Payment. ShouldCitydefaultpriortothecompletionoftheconstructionoftheParkImprovementsandthePartiesareunabletoagreeonamendmentofthisMOUtootherwiseprovideforthecompletionoftheconstructionoftheimprovementsandthisMOUisterminated, thenCityshallreimburseHARDtheamountofHARDFundstransferredtoCitypriortotheCitydefault. Uponthereceiptofsuchreimbursement, HARDshallrecordthequitclaimdeedsetforthinSection18, above. ShouldthisMOUbeterminatedatanyothertimepriortotheexpirationoftheTermforareasonotherthanaHARDEventofDefault, thenCityshallpaytoHARDanamountbasedonthepercentageofyearsremainingintheTermatthetimeoftheterminationandthetotalnumberofyearsintheTermandappliedtothetotalamountofHARDFundsusedtopaycostsfortheconstructionoftheParkImprovements. Forinstance, ifHARDFundsintheamountof $15,400,000.00areusedonParkImprovementconstructioncostsandtheterminationoccursinthe15thyearoftheTerm, thenCitywouldpaytoHARDfortypercent (40%) ofthatamountor $6,160,000.00. Uponreceiptofsuchpayment, HARDwouldrecordthequitclaimdeedsetforthinSection18, above. SuchpaymentwouldnotaffectHARD’sentitlementtoreimbursementofaportionoftheHARDFundsusedforconstructioncostsfromfutureparkin-lieufeescollectedbyCityassetforthinSection3(d), above. 21. Indemnity for Claims. a) City Indemnity. Cityshallindemnify, defend (withcounselselectedbyCity, subjecttoHARD’sapproval, whichshallnotbeunreasonablywithheld), andholdHARDanditselectedandappointedofficers, officials, employees, agentsandrepresentatives (alloftheforegoing, collectivelythe “Indemnitees”) harmlessfromandagainstanyandallliabilities, losses, damages, fines, deficiencies, penalties, claims, demands, suits, actions, causesofaction, legaloradministrativeproceedings, judgments, costsandexpenses (includingwithoutlimitationreasonableattorneys’ feesandcourtcosts) (alloftheforegoing, collectively “Claims”) incurredbyorbroughtagainstHARDforthefailureofCitytocomplywithApplicableLaws, including, butnotlimitedto, theQuimbyAct, theprocurement, retention, compensationandterminationofProjectContractorsorthedesign, construction, installationorCityfundingoftheParkProject, excepttotheextentsuchClaimarisesfromthenegligenceorwillfulmisconductofHARDorfromHARD’sfailuretomeetitsProjectfundingobligationsassetforthinthisMOU. TheforegoingindemnityobligationshallsurvivetheexpirationoftheTermandextensionthereofortheearlierterminationofthisMOU. b) HARD Indemnity. HARDshallindemnify, defend (withcounselselectedbyHARD, subjecttoCity’sapproval, whichshallnotbeunreasonablywithheld), andholdCityanditselectedandappointedofficers, officials, employees, agentsandrepresentatives (alloftheforegoing, collectivelythe “Indemnitees”) harmlessfromandagainstanyandallliabilities, losses, damages, fines, deficiencies, penalties, claims, demands, suits, actions, causesofaction, legaloradministrativeproceedings, judgments, costsandexpenses (includingwithoutlimitation Docusign Envelope ID: 6EC23AE8- C836- 4E89- 9408- EB00B2D1C994 22 HARDRevisions: 12-04-24
Page12of14
reasonableattorneys’ feesandcourtcosts) (alloftheforegoing, collectively “Claims”) incurredbyorbroughtagainstCityarisingoutofHARD’suse, occupancy, operation, management, ormaintenanceoftheparkandimprovements, excepttotheextentsuchClaimarisesfromthenegligenceorwillfulmisconductofCity. 22. Dispute Resolution. IfthePartiesareunabletoresolveanydisputearisinginconnectionwiththisMOU, otherthananEventofDefaultofeitherParty, thePartiesagreetosubmitsuchdisputetoamutuallyacceptableprofessionalmediatorandtonegotiateingoodfaithtowardreachingaresolutionofthedisputepriortocommencementofanycivilaction. EachPartyshallpayanequalshareofthemediator’sfeesandexpenses. EachPartyshallberesponsibleforanyotherfeesorcostssuchPartyincursinconnectionwithparticipationinthemediation. 23. Entire Agreement; Amendment. ThisMOUconstitutestheentireunderstandingandagreementofthePartiesandsupersedesallnegotiationsorpreviousagreementsbetweenthePartieswithrespecttoalloranypartofthesubjectmatterhereof. ThisMOUmaybeamendedonlyinwritingsignedbyauthorizedrepresentativesofHARDandCity. 24. Severability. ShouldanyprovisionofanyofthisMOUbefoundinvalidbyacourtorotherbodyofcompetentjurisdiction, saidinvalidityorineffectivenessshallnotaffectthevalidityoftheremainingprovisionsofsuchagreementwhichshallremaininforcetothemaximumextentpossible. 25. Interpretation. ThePartiesacknowledgethateachPartyanditscounselhavereviewedandrevisedthisMOUandthattheruleofconstructiontotheeffectthatanyambiguitiesaretoberesolvedagainstthedraftingpartyshallnotbeemployed. Thedefinedtermshereinshallapplyequallytoboththesingularandthepluralformsofthetermsdefined. Wheneverthecontextmayrequire, anypronounshallincludethecorrespondingmasculine, feminine, andneuterforms. Thewords “include” and “including” shallbedeemedtobefollowedbythephrase “withoutlimitation.” Thewords “approval," “consent" and “notice” shallbedeemedtobeprecededbytheword “written.” 26. Governing Law. ThisMOUshallbegovernedbyandconstruedinaccordancewiththelawsoftheStateofCalifornia. Anyactiontointerpret, enforceorchallengeanarbitrationawardasdescribedabove, shallbefiledintheSuperiorCourtofAlamedaCounty. 27. No Conflict of Interest. EachPartywarrantstotheotherthatnomemberofthegoverningbodyofCityorHARDandnootherpublicofficialofsuchlocalityorlocalitiesduringhis/hertenureandforoneyearthereafter, shallhaveanyinterest, directorindirect, inanycontractorsubcontract, ortheproceedsthereof, forworktobeperformedinconnectionwiththeProject. 28. Counterparts. ThisMOUmaybeexecutedinanynumberofcounterpartsandbydifferentPartiesheretoinseparatecounterparts, eachofwhichwhensoexecutedshallbedeemedtobeanoriginalandallofwhichtakentogethershallconstituteoneandthe Docusign Envelope ID: 6EC23AE8- C836- 4E89- 9408- EB00B2D1C994 23 HARDRevisions: 12-04-24
Page13of14
sameagreement. SignaturesdeliveredelectronicallyorbyfacsimileshallbeasbindingasoriginalsupontheParties. 29. Further Assurances. FromandafterthedateofeachofthisMOU, thePartiesagreetodosuchthings, performsuchacts, andmake, execute, acknowledgeanddeliversuchdocumentsasmaybereasonablynecessaryorproperandusualtotimelycompletetheactionscontemplatedbysuchagreement. 30. Authorized Representatives. ExceptasotherwiseexpresslyprovidedinthisMOU, wheneverundertheprovisionsofanyofthisMOUtheapprovalofHARDorCityisrequired, orHARDorCityisrequiredtotakesomeactionattherequestoftheother, suchapprovalorrequestshallbegivenforCitybytheCityManagerorhisorherdesignee, andforHARDbyHARD’sGeneralManagerorhisorherdesignee, andanyPartyheretoshallbeauthorizedtorelyuponandsuchapprovalorrequest. 31. No Assignment. NeitherPartymayassignitsrightsorobligationsunderanyofthisAgreementwithouttheexpresswrittenconsentoftheotherPartywhichmaybegrantedordeniedinitssolediscretion. 32. Authority. EachPartyrepresentsthatthesignatoryhastheauthoritytobindeachrespectiveentity, andassentstoeachandeverytermcontainedwithinthisMOU. 33. No Third- Party Beneficiaries. ItistheintentionofthePartiesthatundernocircumstancesareanyrightscreatedforpersonsorentitieswhoarenotpartiestothisMOUandHARDandCityowenodutytoanypersonsorentitiesnotpartiestothisMOUunderathird-partybeneficiarytheoryorunderanyothertheoryoflaw. 34. Attorneys’ Fees. IfeitherPartycommencesanylegalactionagainsttheotherpartyarisingoutofthisMOUortheperformancethereof, eachPartyinsuchactionshallberesponsibleforitsownlitigationexpenses, includingbutnotlimitedtocourtcosts, expertwitnessfees, discoveryexpensesandattorneys’ fees. 35. No Joint Venture. ItisexpresslyunderstoodandagreedthatneitherPartyshallbecomeasaresultofthisMOUapartneroftheotherorajointventurerwiththeotherPartyintheconductofsuchParty’sbusinessorotherwise. ThisMOUisnotintended, andshallnotbeconstrued, tocreatetherelationshipofprincipalandagent, partnership, jointventure, orassociationasbetweenCityandHARD. 36. Successorsand Assigns. Subjecttotherestrictionsonassignmentsetforthabove, alloftheterms, covenants, andconditionsofthisMOUshallbebindinguponCityandHARDandtheirrespectivepermittedsuccessorsandassigns.

Docusign Envelope ID: 6EC23AE8- C836- 4E89- 9408- EB00B2D1C994 24 HARDRevisions: 12-04-24
Page14of14

37. Contacts. Allnoticesandrequestshereunderbyeitherpartyshallbeinwritinganddirectedtothepartiesasfollows: ToHARD: JamesWheeler, GeneralManagerHaywardAreaRecreationandParkDistrict1099EStreetHayward, CA94541TotheCity: Dr. AnaM. AlvarezCityofHayward777BStreetHayward, CA94541-5007 INWITNESSHEREOF, CityandHARDhaveexecutedthisMOUasofthedatesetforthabove. HAYWARDRECREATIONANDPARKDISTRICT Dated: By: JamesWheeler, GeneralManager

CITYOFHAYWARD
Dated: ______________________________ By: AlexAmeri, DirectorofPublicWorks Dated: ______________________________ By: Dr. AnaM. Alvarez, CityManager Attest: MiriamLens, CityClerkApprovedastoformandprocedure:

MichaelS. Lawson, CityAttorney
Docusign Envelope ID: 6EC23AE8- C836- 4E89- 9408- EB00B2D1C994 1/ 24/ 2025
1/ 24/ 2025
1/ 28/ 2025
1/ 29/ 2025
1/ 29/ 2025
25 EXHIBITA
Project SiteMap
Attachedhereto)
Docusign Envelope ID: 6EC23AE8- C836- 4E89- 9408- EB00B2D1C994 26 Tennyson
RoadRiP
27 EXHIBITB
Park Project ConceptualPlan
Attachedhereto)
Docusign Envelope ID: 6EC23AE8- C836- 4E89- 9408- EB00B2D1C994 28 EXHIBIT B - PROJECT

CONCEPTUAL PLAN
PICNIC

PLAYGROUND

DOG RUN

BASKETBALL

DOG RUN

BIORETENTION / SCIENCE GARDEN

FOOTHILL TRAIL

EXERCISE

BASKETBALL COURT
SLIDES

PLAYGROUND

ENTRYD R I V E

PARKING

AMPHITHEATER
Docusign Envelope ID: 6EC23AE8- C836- 4E89- 9408- EB00B2D1C994 29 Page1of3
AMENDMENTNO. 1TOMEMORANDUMOFUNDERSTANDINGBETWEENTHECITYOFHAYWARDANDHAYWARDAREARECREATIONANDPARKDISTRICTFORTHELAVISTAPARKPROJECT THISAmendmentNo. 1totheMemorandumofUnderstanding (“MOU”), datedforconveniencethis _______ dayof ___________ 2025, isbetweentheCityofHayward (“City”), amunicipalcorporationoftheStateofCalifornia, andtheHaywardAreaRecreationandParkDistrict (“HARD”), aCaliforniaspecialdistrict, hereinafterreferredtoindividuallyasa “Party” andcollectivelyas “Parties,” andamendstheMOUwhichwasenteredintoonJanuary29, 2025, forthedesign, construction, funding, operationandmaintenanceofLaVistaParkinHayward, California. RECITALS: WHEREAS, byResolutionNo. 24-259, onDecember17, 2024, theCityCouncilauthorizedanddirectedtotheCityManagertoexecuteanewMemorandumofUnderstandingwiththeHaywardAreaRecreationandParkDistrictforthefunding, operations, andmaintenanceofLaVistaPark; andWHEREAS, CityandHARDexecutedtheaforementionedMOUonthe29thdayofJanuary, 2025; andWHEREAS, afterreceivingandreviewingconstructionbids, Staffdeterminedanadditional $6,444,000isneededtofullyfundtheconstructionofLaVistaParkincludingdesign, construction, administration, inspections, andtestingcosts; andNOW, THEREFORE, CityandHARDagreetothefollowingamendmentstotheMOUasfollows:

3. Funding of Construction of Park Project Improvements a) Park In-Lieu Fees. ThePartiesagreethatCitywillallocateNineteenMillionFourHundredForty-fourThousandDollars ( $19,444,000.00) inaccumulatedparkin-lieufees (QuimbyActfees) collectedbyCityasoftheEffectiveDatefromcertainresidentialdevelopmentprojectsinthecommunitiestobeservedbytheParkProperty, including, butnotlimitedto, theDeveloperFeeContribution (“ParkIn-LieuFees”). Inaddition, andasfurthersetforthinSection3(d), below, thePartiesagreethatCitywillallocateSixMillion, SevenHundredThousandDollars ($6,700,000.00) ofexistingand/orfutureparkin-lieufeescollectedbyCityfromdevelopersofresidentialdevelopmentprojectsincommunitiestobeservedbytheParkPropertytoHARDasareimbursementofaportionofHARD’sfinancialcontributiontotheProjectasdescribedinSection3(c), below.

Docusign Envelope ID: 02F57E4C- 8ABF- 4C93- 8AFD- D34DFF03E0BE July17th
Attachment III
30 Page2of3
e). Summary of Total Available Funding.

ParkIn-LieuFeeAllocation $19,444,000.00CityofHaywardContribution $5,785,000.00CityPreviouslyIncurredCosts $2,140,000.00HARDContribution $15,400,000.00Total $ 42,769,000.00

4. Project CostsEstimate. Basedonconstructionbidsreceived, Cityhasdeterminedthetotalprojectcostasshownbelow: ConstructionContract $32,850,547Contingency (12%) $ 3,942,066 ConstructionSubtotal $ 36,792,613
Design $ 998,387Administration $998,000GeotechnicalInspection, TestingandReporting $1,840,000PreviouslyIncurredCityCosts $2,140,000TotalProjectCost $ 42,769,000 Exceptasspecificallyamendedherein, allothertermsandconditionsoftheMOUshallremaininfullforceandeffect.

Docusign Envelope ID: 02F57E4C- 8ABF- 4C93- 8AFD- D34DFF03E0BE 31 Page3of3
INWITNESSWHEREOF, CityandHARDhaveexecutedthisAmendmentNo. 1asofthedatesetforthabove.

HAYWARDAREARECREATIONANDPARKDISTRICT
Dated: By: JamesWheeler, GeneralManager

CITYOFHAYWARD
Dated: ______________________________ By: AlexAmeri, DirectorofPublicWorks Dated: ______________________________ By: JayantiAddleman, InterimCityManager Attest: MiriamLens, CityClerkApprovedastoformandprocedure:

MichaelS. Lawson, CityAttorney
Docusign Envelope ID: 02F57E4C- 8ABF- 4C93- 8AFD- D34DFF03E0BE 7/ 10/ 2025
7/ 10/ 2025
7/ 16/ 2025
32 Hayward Police Department Year-End Report
1 Joint Agency Discussion of La Vista Park Project and
Coordination Opportunities on Future Park Projects
February 05, 2026
Council Infrastructure & Airport Committee,
City of Hayward
Capital Projects Committee,
Hayward Area Recreation & Park District
33 Hayward Police Department Year-End Report
2 La Vista Park
Construction Phase Coordination
- Design effort and financing
- Transition to construction
- Continue City and HARD collaboration
- Weekly coordination meeting with full project team
- Ongoing communication on cost, schedule, and field issues 34 Hayward Police Department Year-End Report
3 La Vista Park
Value Engineering Overview
- Keyway construction value engineering developed with
Design Team & Contractor
- Focus on maintaining approved park features, usability, and safety
- Approx. $5.2M targeted in project savings
- Revised Construction Contract approx. $29M
35 Hayward Police Department Year-End Report
4 La Vista Park
Project Timeline
- Preconstruction meeting in February
- Meeting with Building Trades in February
- Anticipated start of construction mid March, 300 working days, completion estimated by Summer 2027
36 Hayward Police Department Year-End Report
5 Questions and Discussion
37 Coordination Opportunities on Future Park Projects
Hayward Area Recreation & Park District
Special Council Infrastructure &
Airport Committee Meeting
February 5, 2026
38 Foothill Trail
H.A.R.D. Board of Directors approved the
Foothill Trail Master Plan in November 2020
The master plan provides guidance to be
used as part of the development and
approval process for undeveloped properties,
including Caltrans 238 bypass parcels
When completed, the future trail will provide
a 6-mile route for travel and recreation
39 Foothill Trail Master Plan
Caltrans Parcel Map
40 Foothill Trail from A Street to Grove Way
A small portion has been constructed linking A
Street to the Japanese Gardens, Hayward Area
Senior Center, and Douglas Morrisson Theatre
A Habitat Conservation Fund grant has been
awarded for the continuation of that trail
segment to Grove Way through Caltrans PG8
Community meeting Sat Feb. 21 from 10am-
noon at Hayward Area Senior Center for
concept plan review
41 Eden Greenway
The Eden Greenway is a 2-mile linear park through a PG&E utility corridor H.A.R.D Leases the property for recreation purposes
The northern end is anchored by the Hayward Community Garden – renovated in 2020 to provide 70 garden plots, an outdoor education area, and other support amenities 42 Eden Greenway 6 Pickleball Courts were added to Southgate Park in 2022 Southgate Playground was renovated in 2024
Disc golf was added to the section near Southgate Park in 2025
The paving in the section at Cypress & Harder was
repaved in 2025 to help support HPN activities at that
location
The play area at Berry Avenue will be renovated in 2026 as part of our Playground Renovation project
The basketball courts near Contessa & Cypress will be
renovated in 2026 as part of our Basketball & Tennis
Court Renovation project
43 Eden Greenway
In 2024, HARD worked with landscape
architectural students from CalPoly SLO to
develop concept plans to activate the
greenway
The project included City staff to coordinate
stormwater management as part of the
project goals
HARD signed a Letter of Support for the
City’s Caltrans Sustainable Planning Grant
application for an active transportation link
and the improvement of street crossings
along the greenway
44 Questions and Discussion
45