Healdsburg City Council
June 21, 2022

WHEREAS, the Rate Study demonstrated that the recommended rates do not exceed the reasonable cost of providing water and wastewater services and, as such, the proposed rates are not levied for general revenue purposes; and
WHEREAS, the proposed rates reflect the cost of providing service to all customers and customer classes through the apportionment of costs based on customer, capacity, and demand characteristics; and
WHEREAS, on April 18, 2022, the Council accepted the Rate Study as the basis for proposing multi-year rate increases for the City’s Water Funds; and directed staff to prepare and mail, as required by law, a notice of public hearing on the proposed water and wastewater rates; and
WHEREAS, at least forty-five days in advance of the public hearing at which this Resolution was considered, notice of the public hearing, and notice of oral and written protest procedures against the proposed rates increases, were mailed to all property owners and customers in compliance with California Constitution Article XIII D, Section 6; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was also published in a local newspaper in accordance with applicable laws; and
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Clerk tabulated the number of written and oral protests received and reported that there was not a majority protest of the proposed water services rate increase or of the proposed wastewater services rate increase by owners or authorized representatives of identified parcels receiving such services.

FINDINGS
WHEREAS, based on the information presented, including the staff report and comments made by members of the public, the City Council of the City of Healdsburg finds as follows:

A. The purposes of the updated water and wastewater services rates established pursuant to this Resolution are to (1) recover the reasonable estimated cost of the services for which the rates are charged; (2) provide that such costs are allocated among City customers so as to bear a fair and reasonable relationship to customers’ burdens on and benefits from City water and wastewater services; (3) secure the financial stability of the water and wastewater systems; (4) ensure high quality services; and (5) provide a sound financial plan that meets existing debt service obligations, which will assist in funding capital improvement projects.

B. The updated water and wastewater services rates established pursuant to this resolution are not levied for general revenue purposes.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Resolution - Water & Wastewater Rates (3672 : Water & Wastewater Rate Adoption) Resolution No. -2022

C. The rates set forth in this Resolution are intended to meet operating expenses, meet financial reserve needs and requirements, secure funding for capital improvement projects to maintain service with existing service areas, and recover costs necessary to maintain the current level of City water and wastewater services. As such, adoption of the rates proposed in the Report, as they relate to provision of water and wastewater services to City customers, is not a “project” within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act or C.E.Q.A. (Public Resources Code § 21080(b)(8)(A, C, and D)).

D. The record of proceedings (“Record”) establishes that the costs listed in the Report as those incurred by the City in providing water and wastewater services to City customers are reasonable estimates of the cost of providing such services, and that the revisions recommended in the Report for existing water and wastewater service rates are necessary to recover the reasonable, estimated cost of providing such services for which the rates are charged, to allocate such costs among City customers so that they bear a fair and reasonable relationship to customers, and to secure the financial stability of City water and wastewater systems in accordance with the analyses contained in the Report.

E. The procedures followed and the rates adopted are in compliance with California Constitution Article XIII D.

F. There is not a protest of the proposed water services rate increases or of the proposed wastewater services rate increases by a majority of owners, or authorized representatives, of identified parcels receiving such services.

ADOPTION OF RATES

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEALDSBURG DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Definitions.
a) “City Customer” shall mean any person, corporation, or other entity that receives City water and/or wastewater services, regardless of whether City water and/or wastewater services are provided to property within the City, or property outside the boundaries of the City.
b) “Rates” shall mean the charge or charges imposed on City Customers to recover the costs incurred by the City in providing water and wastewater services.

Section 2. Water and Wastewater Services Rates Imposed. The City Council accepts and approves the Rate Study setting forth the basis for the Rates discussed herein. The Rates set forth in Exhibit “A”, attached, are hereby adopted and said Rates shall supersede and replace the rates set forth in City Council Resolution 34-2016. Rates shall apply to and be paid by City Customers at the times, and in the amounts, and otherwise apply and be administered as prescribed in this

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Resolution - Water & Wastewater Rates (3672 : Water & Wastewater Rate Adoption) Resolution No. -2022

Resolution, said Rates to become effective as of July 1 of each fiscal year, through and including July 1, 2026.

Section 3. Time for Payment of Rates. City Customers shall pay the Rates as prescribed in bills issued to City Customers in accordance with Section 13.12.190 of the City’s Municipal Code, subject to all applicable regulation, requirements, and penalties for non-compliance pursuant to the Municipal Code and other applicable law.

Section 4. Rate Amounts. The Rate amounts shall be as specified in the rate schedule attached as Exhibit “A” to this Resolution, which schedule is hereby incorporated into this Resolution.

Section 5. Use of Rate Revenue. The revenues raised by payment of the Rates shall be used to fund the estimated reasonable cost of providing the services for which the Rates are charged, and the Rate revenues shall not be used for general revenues purposes.

Section 6. Subsequent Analysis and Revision of the Rates. The Rates set herein are adopted and implemented by the City Council in reliance on the Record identified above. The City may continue to conduct further study and analyses to determine whether the Rates should be revised.

When additional information is available, the City Council may review the rates to determine that the Rate amounts do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the services for which the Rates are charged.

Section 7. Effective Date. This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption.

Section 8. Severability. The Rates and all portions of this Resolution are severable. Should any of the Rates or any portion of this Resolution be adjudged to be invalid and unenforceable by a body of competent jurisdiction, then the remaining Rates and/or Resolution portions shall be and continue in full force and effect, except as to those Rates and/or Resolution that have been adjudged invalid.

The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each of the Rates and this Resolution and each section, subsection, clause, sentence, phrase and other portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that one or more of the Rates or sections, subsections, clauses, sentences, phrases or other portions of this Resolution may be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Resolution - Water & Wastewater Rates (3672 : Water & Wastewater Rate Adoption) Resolution No. -2022

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 21st day of June 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAINING: Councilmembers:

SO ORDERED: ATTEST:
_________________________________ ____________________________________ Oswaldo Jimenez, Mayor Raina Allan, City Clerk

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Resolution - Water & Wastewater Rates (3672 : Water & Wastewater Rate Adoption) Resolution No. -2022

EXHIBIT ‘A’
Rate schedules are further detailed within the 2022 Water and Wastewater Rate Study Normal
Supply
Conditions
Stage 1
Minor
Shortage
Stage 2
Moderate
Shortage
Stage 3
Significant
Shortage
Stage 4
Urgent
Shortage
Stage 5
Critical
Shortage
Stage 6
Severe
Shortage
Conservation Need n/a 0 to 10% 10% to 20% 20% to 30% 30% to 40% 40% to 50% > 50% Water Shortage Surcharge 0% 6% 10% 15% 20% 24%

1.) When water supplies are short, the surcharge will be added to the then-current Water Usage Rates and fixed Service Charges.

Water Shortage Rate Surcharges

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Resolution - Water & Wastewater Rates (3672 : Water & Wastewater Rate Adoption) Resolution No.
-2022

7.A.b
Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Resolution - Water & Wastewater Rates (3672 : Water & Wastewater Rate Adoption)

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: June 21, 2022
SUBJECT: Consider adoption of increases to the Passalacqua Pump-Station Pumping Surcharge and meter maintenance charge associated with the Montage Resort area
PREPARED BY: Terry Crowley, Utilities Director
STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):

Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

1. Conduct a public hearing in accordance with Proposition 218 for the proposed changes to the Passalacqua Pump-Station Surcharge; and

2. Adopt a Resolution determining that there was no majority protest for the proposed water surcharge of the Passalacqua Pump-Station surcharge, approving updated water surcharges, and superseding the existing surcharge established by Resolution No. 7-2019.

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:

In March the City Council was presented with an overview of the City’s Water and Wastewater Departments financial outlook and proposed rate increases. On April 18, 2022 the City Council again was presented with the financial outlook and proposed rate increases. On May 3, 2022 notices of a public hearing, to be held June 21, 2022, for the final adoption of the proposed pumping surcharge and meter-maintenance fee with the process to protest the rate increases mailed to utility customers and property owners subject to these surcharges.

BACKGROUND:

On January 7, 2019 the City Council held a public hearing to establish special fees related to providing water service to the Montage Development (formerly Saggio Hills). These additional fees are intended to the recover cost associated with the Passalacqua Pump-Station and ongoing maintenance costs related to a special water-meter installed for the Montage Resort.

On April 18, 2022, the Council accepted the Water and Wastewater Rate Study which reviewed and recommended increases for the Passalacqua Pump-Station Surcharge and Meter Maintenance Charge. These fees or surcharges are in addition to the base water fees charge every

7.B
Packet Pg. 314
customer. During the April meeting the Council directed staff to prepare and mail, as required by law, a notice of public hearing on the proposed fees, with the public hearing to be held on June 21, 2022.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

In developing the additional surcharges for the pump-station and meter maintenance, the City’s consultant followed two principles; 1) fees must cover the full operating and capital replacement costs of the facilities and 2) fees must be fair and equitable to the end users. The final 2022 Water and Wastewater Rate Study includes a multi-year financial plan for the Pumping Surcharge and Meter Maintenance Charge, updated cost-of-service analysis, and updated rates.

Passalacqua Pump-Station Surcharge
The Montage Resort and related residential development (Saggio Hills Area Plan) encompasses 258.5 acres and provided for the development of a 130-unit resort hotel and associated amenities (e.g., spa, restaurant, wedding pavilion, etc.), 70 resort residences, a community park, public and private open space and trails, a pump station, and a City fire substation. As required to serve portions of the development, a new water pump station (the Passalacqua Pump-Station) was built to provide water for normal use and fire flows.

The Passalacqua Pump Station zone of benefit encompasses of portion of the Saggio Hills Area Plan that includes the Montage Resort, the 70 low-density residential area, and associated landscaping. Areas that are within the Saggio Hills Area Plan but located below and outside the Pump Station’s zone of benefit are not subject to a Pumping Surcharge. These include the area designated for future affordable housing, the Fire Station, the Community Park, and certain landscaped areas.

The pump station has been dedicated to the City’s water utility. Under the terms of the development agreement, the cost to operate and maintain these facilities is allocated to the water customers that will benefit from the facilities. This requires a water pumping surcharge or the Passalacqua Pump-Station Surcharge. Below are the 2022 proposed rates for the pumping surcharge and will be added to each unit of water provide within the zone of benefit.

7.B
Packet Pg. 315
Table 11 from the 2022 Water & Wastewater Rate Study showing the additional fees for water provided to areas of the Montage Resort.

The proposed rates provide a sliding scale of cost based upon usage within the zone of benefit.

Each fiscal year, City staff will review the previous fiscal year’s usage within the pump-station’s zone of benefit and revise, up or down, the surcharge for the current fiscal year. Additionally, these rates will be adjusted for inflation as further described later in this staff report.

Meter Maintenance Charge
In addition to the pumping surcharge there is a meter maintenance charge for a special watermeter (10” meter with a 2” bypass) installed at the Montage Resort. The water-meter installed is unique within Healdsburg’s water system and requires additional maintenance from City Public Works Staff. To recover the costs of the meter maintenance, a fee was adopted in 2019 and has been reviewed and updated with the 2022 rate study. The proposed meter maintenance charge will allow the City to recover the cost of maintaining the meter as well as future replacement costs. The proposed meter maintenance fee is $284.83 and is in addition to other fees charged to all water users.

7.B
Packet Pg. 316
Annually Fee Adjustments
Both the Pumping Surcharge and Meter Maintenance Charge will be adjusted annually to account for inflation. As proposed in the Water Rate Study, the surcharge and metermaintenance fee are adjusted based upon the amount of water provided each year and inflation as indicated by the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Consumer Price Index (SF-CPI). Annual inflationary adjustments for up to five years can be approved as part of the Proposition 218 rate approval process in accordance with Government Code Section 53756. Any additional adjustments after five years (i.e., after FY 2026/27) will require a new Proposition 218 process and City Council approval.

The scheduled public hearing for June 21, 2022 during the Council’s regularly scheduled meeting will allow the City Council to receive public input on the recommended increases. As required by Prop 218, public hearing notices were mailed to all affected utility property owners 45 days prior to the public hearing. Absent a majority protest on the proposed rates, as tallied during the June 21, 2022 public hearing, the Council can adopt the proposed water and wastewater rates.

The full Water and Waste Water rate study is attached to the adoption of Water and Wastewater rates item.

ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:

The recommended action does not include an environmental component.

ALTERNATIVES:

Council may, after receiving public input, choose not to approve of the proposed rate increases and provide further direction to staff. Staff does not recommend this alternative as detailed within the Rate Study, there is a clear need to increase rates in order for the City to continue to provide adequate levels of water service.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Adopting the resolution will provide increased water revenues to enable the City to meet operational requirements. Without rate increases, the City will likely not recover adequate revenue to operate the pump-station and maintain the special meter.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

Pursuant to Title 14, the California Code of Regulations, Section 15302(c) of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") guidelines, the proposed action is an administrative activity of the City that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Resolution - Pump-Station Surcharge

7.B
Packet Pg. 317

CITY OF HEALDSBURG
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

HEALDSBURG DETERMINING THAT THERE WAS NO MAJORITY

PROTEST OF THE PROPOSED ESTABLISHMENT OF A PASSALACQUA

PUMP-STATION SURCHARGE, APPROVING THE SURCHARGE, AND

SUPERSEDING THE EXISTING SURCHARGE ESTABLISHED BY
RESOLUTION NO. 7-2019

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City of Healdsburg (“City”) operates and maintains potable water and wastewater systems for the benefit of residents and businesses in the City, and for certain customers outside the boundaries of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City water and wastewater systems are operated as self-supporting utility enterprises; and
WHEREAS, revenue from water and wastewater service rates and other sources fund the ongoing operating and capital needs of City water and wastewater systems, including providing for normal facility operations, replacement and repair of equipment, improvements required to meet state and federal regulatory requirements, inflation and other costs; and WHEREAS, the Saggio Hills Area Plan (Montage Resort and related residential development) encompasses 258.5 acres and provides for the development of a 130-unit resort hotel and associated amenities (e.g., spa, restaurant, wedding pavilion, etc.), 70 resort residences, a community park, public and private open space and trails, a pump station, a City fire substation, and 14.16 acres of land for the future development of affordable housing; and WHEREAS, the Passalacqua Pump Station Zone of Benefit encompasses the portion of the Saggio Hills Area Plan that includes the Montage Resort, the low-density residential area, and associated landscaping. Areas that are within the Saggio Hills Area Plan but are located below the Pump Station will not be subject to the Pumping Surcharge. These include the “Affordable Housing” area, the Fire Station, the Community Park, and certain landscaped areas; and WHEREAS, as a requirement to serve portions of the development, a water pump station (the Passalacqua Pump-Station) was built to convey water for normal use and fire flows, and dedicated to the City; and
WHEREAS, under the terms of the Development Agreement between the City and Sonoma Luxury Resorts, LLC, the cost to operate and maintain the water pump station will be allocated to the water customers that will benefit from the facilities (“Pumping Surcharge”), as indicated in the Agreement’s language below:

7.B.a
Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Resolution - Pump-Station Surcharge (3682 : Passalaxqua Pump-Station Surcharge Adoption) “Developer shall be aware of and agree to the development and establishment of a surcharge for the additional costs (including but not limited to cost of energy, fuel, labor and materials for maintenance and replacement of motor controls, pumping equipment, building maintenance, etc.) associated with the operation and maintenance (O&M) of a new water pumping station. The new pumping station is necessary, and only benefits the Saggio Hills development, in order to provide peak domestic flow, fire flow and landscape irrigation at acceptable pressures. The monthly surcharge will be billed to all future Saggio Hills Development water users as a component of the monthly water bill based on actual usage.”
WHEREAS, the cost of these facilities will be allocated based on volume of water usage, as indicated in the agreement’s language below:
“Because the Pump Station will serve only the Resort and the Residences, the City requires that the costs and expenses that the City incurs in the ownership, operation, maintenance, repair and replacement of the Pump Station be paid by and allocated to the owners of the Resort and the Residences as part of a "Zone of Benefit" under the City's water billing policies and practices. The City therefore shall have the right to from time-to-time impose on each water bill for the Resort and each of the Residences a surcharge (based on a charge assessed against each cubic foot of water consumed, which charge shall be the same for the Resort and each of the Residences) sufficient to reimburse the City for such costs and expenses and to provide a reserve for replacement of the Pump Station and/or components thereof. The Developer shall disclose in writing to each purchaser of a Residence the intent and right of the City to impose such surcharge.” WHEREAS, Hildebrand Consulting prepared a 2022 Water and Wastewater Rate Study (“Rate Study”); and
WHEREAS, the areas that are subject to the Pumping Surcharge include the Montage Resort and the Low-Density Residential area; and
WHEREAS, the Pumping Surcharge is intended to recover the costs of the pump station’s operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement, and applies to water usage within the development; and
WHEREAS, annual revenues are intended to approximately match annual costs, including contributions to the capital replacement reserve; and
WHEREAS, general inflation will affect both operation and maintenance costs and capital replacement costs; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 53756 provides authority and prescribes the means for the City to make adjustments to the Pumping Surcharge to offset the effects of inflation for a period of up to five years; and

7.B.a
Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Resolution - Pump-Station Surcharge (3682 : Passalaxqua Pump-Station Surcharge Adoption) WHEREAS, at least forty-five days in advance of the public hearing at which this Resolution was considered, notice of the public hearing, and notice of oral and written protest procedures against the Pumping Surcharge, were mailed to all property owners and customers in compliance with California Constitution Article XIII D, Section 6; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was also published in a local newspaper in accordance with applicable laws; and
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Clerk tabulated the number of written and oral protests received and reported that there was not a majority protest of the proposed Pumping Surcharge by owners or authorized representatives of identified parcels receiving such services.

FINDINGS
WHEREAS, based on the information presented, including the staff report and comments made by members of the public, the City Council of the City of Healdsburg finds as follows:

A. The purposes for the Pumping Surcharge, established pursuant to this Resolution, are to: (1) recover the reasonable estimated cost of the services for which the Pumping Surcharge is charged; (2) provide that such costs are allocated among impacted City customers so as to bear a fair and reasonable relationship to customers’ burdens on and benefits from City water and wastewater services; (3) secure the financial stability of the water and wastewater systems; (4) ensure high quality services; and (5) provide a sound financial plan that meets existing debt service obligations, which will assist in funding capital improvement projects.

B. The Pumping Surcharge pursuant to this resolution is not levied for general revenue purposes.

C. The Pumping Surcharge set forth in this Resolution is intended to meet operating expenses, meet financial reserve needs and requirements, secure funding for capital improvement projects to maintain service within existing service areas, and recover costs necessary to maintain the current level of City water and wastewater services. As such, adoption of the Pumping Surcharge proposed in the Rate Study, as it relates to provision of water and wastewater services to City customers, is not a “project” within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act or C.E.Q.A. (Public Resources Code § 21080(b)(8)(A, C, and D)).

D. The record of proceedings (“Record”) establishes that the costs listed in the Rate Study as those incurred by the City in services to City customers are reasonable estimates of the cost of providing such services, and that the establishment recommended in the Rate Study of a Pumping Surcharge is necessary to recover the reasonable, estimated cost of providing such service for which the Pumping Surcharge is charged, to allocate such costs among the impacted City customers so that they bear a fair and reasonable relationship to customers, and to secure the

7.B.a
Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Resolution - Pump-Station Surcharge (3682 : Passalaxqua Pump-Station Surcharge Adoption) financial stability of City water and wastewater systems in accordance with the analyses contained in the Rate Study.

E. The procedures followed, and the Pumping Surcharge adopted are in compliance with California Constitution Article XIII C and Article XIII D, Section 6.

F. There is not a protest of the proposed establishment of a Pumping Surcharge by a majority of owners, or authorized representatives, of identified parcels receiving such services.

ADOPTION OF SURCHARGE

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEALDSBURG DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Pumping Surcharge Imposed. The Pumping Surcharge set forth in Exhibit “A”, attached, is hereby approved. The Pumping Surcharge shall apply to and be paid by the City customers benefiting from Passalacqua Pump-Station at the times, and in the amounts, and otherwise apply and be administered as prescribed in this Resolution, said Surcharge to become effective on July 1, 2022 and annually updated based on the total annual water demand from the prior year.

Section 2. Pumping Surcharge Amounts. The Pumping Surcharge amount shall be as specified in the schedule attached as Exhibit “A” to this Resolution and said rates shall supersede and replace the rates set forth in City Council Resolution 7-2019. The Pumping Surcharge schedule is hereby incorporated into this Resolution.

Section 3. Annual Adjustment. Beginning in 2022, the adopted Pumping Surcharge set forth in Exhibit "A" shall be adjusted for inflation by the City Manager on July 1 of every year up to five years by applying the annual change in the then current Consumer Price Index - All Urban Consumers for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward area, as calculated by the U.S.

Department of Labor, for the month of April relative to the prior April.

Section 4. Time for Payment of Pumping Surcharge. City Customers shall pay the Pumping Surcharge as prescribed in bills issued to City Customers in accordance with Section

13.12.190 of the City’s Municipal Code, subject to all applicable regulation, requirements, and penalties for non-compliance pursuant to the Municipal Code and other applicable law.

Section 5. Use of Pumping Surcharge Revenue. The revenues raised by payment of the Pumping Surcharge shall be used to fund the estimated reasonable cost of providing the services for which the Pumping Surcharge is charged, and the Pumping Surcharge revenues shall not be used for general revenues purposes.

Section 6. Subsequent Analysis and Revision of the Surcharge. The Pumping Surcharge set forth herein is adopted and implemented by the City Council in reliance on the Record identified above. The City may continue to conduct further study and analyses to determine whether the Pumping Surcharge should be revised. When additional information is available, the

7.B.a
Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Resolution - Pump-Station Surcharge (3682 : Passalaxqua Pump-Station Surcharge Adoption) City Council may review the Pumping Surcharge to determine that the Pumping Surcharge amounts do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the services for which the Pumping Surcharge is charged.

Section 7. Effective Date. This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption.

Section 8. Severability. The Pumping Surcharge and all portions of this Resolution are severable. Should the Pumping Surcharge or any portion of this Resolution be adjudged to be invalid and unenforceable by a body of competent jurisdiction, then the Pumping Surcharge and/or Resolution portions shall be and continue in full force and effect, except as to the Pumping Surcharge and/or Resolution that have been adjudged invalid.

The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each of the Pumping Surcharge and this Resolution and each section, subsection, clause, sentence, phrase, and other portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that one or more of the Surcharges or sections, subsections, clauses, sentences, phrases or other portions of this Resolution may be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 21st day of June 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAINING: Councilmembers:

SO ORDERED: ATTEST:
_________________________ _________________________
Oswaldo Jimenez, Mayor Raina Allan, City Clerk

7.B.a
Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Resolution - Pump-Station Surcharge (3682 : Passalaxqua Pump-Station Surcharge Adoption) EXHIBIT ‘A’
Passalacqua Pump-Station Pumping Surcharge as further detailed within the 2022 Water and Wastewater Rate Study

7.B.a
Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Resolution - Pump-Station Surcharge (3682 : Passalaxqua Pump-Station Surcharge Adoption)

7.B.a
Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Resolution - Pump-Station Surcharge (3682 : Passalaxqua Pump-Station Surcharge Adoption)

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: June 21, 2022
SUBJECT: Resolution Ordering the Abatement of Weeds
PREPARED BY: Lance MacDonald, Fire Marshal/Division Chief STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):

Provide Effective Governance
Maintain and Enhance Public Health and Safety
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

1. Hold the public hearing; and

2. Adopt a resolution ordering the abatement of weeds.

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:

The Weed Abatement Program is advertised on City social media platforms prior to the start of the weed abatement inspections. The program sets a time and place for a public hearing for the community to protest weed abatement. The program also accepts weed abatement complaints at the fire department which are followed up by fire department prevention staff.

BACKGROUND:

Each year the City, as part of its annual Weed Abatement Program, inspects parcels of property for the presence of weeds, brush and other debris that create or promote a fire hazard or nuisance. At this time, all parcels in the City have been inspected. At the May 16, 2022, meeting, the City Council declared a public nuisance to exist on the properties identified on the “2022 Weed Abatement List”. The property owners on the list were mailed a notice giving 30 days to abate the nuisance or protest the notice at this public hearing. If owners do not protest the notice and fail to abate the problem within the required timeframe, by June 22, 2022, the City will complete the work using its own contractors. Many parcels have been abated and an updated “2022 Weed Abatement Reinspection List” is attached.
“Weeds” as defined in Section 39561.5 of the Government Code that pertain to the City of Healdsburg properties would be:

7.C
Packet Pg. 325
• Sagebrush, chaparral, and any other brush or weeds which attain such large growth as to become, when dry, a fire menace to adjacent improved property. • Weeds which are otherwise noxious or dangerous.
• Poison oak when the conditions of growth are such as to constitute a menace to the public health.
• Dry grass, stubble, brush, litter, or other flammable material which endangers the public safety by creating a fire hazard.

Additionally, parcels within the City defined in Fire Severity Zones (Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area) by City Municipal Code are required to create a defensible space as defined in Government Code 51182 and Chapter 49 of the California Fire Code.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

The Weed Abatement Program follows criteria established by the Government Code for this process. It has also been found to be the most effective manner to abate hazards on private property and provides a mechanism to obtain reimbursement for delinquent payments.

ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:

The Weed Abatement Program reduces the risk of fire within the community by removing “weeds” as defined above that may promote the spread of fire.

ALTERNATIVES:

Discontinue the weed abatement program allowing the nuisance and fire hazards to exist; or issue citations under the Fire Code section 304.1.2, which does not provide a mechanism for forced abatement or reimbursement for abatement of the property. Either of these options would alleviate the need for setting a time and place for protesting the weed abatement.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Funds to provide abatement on properties owned by unresponsive homeowners are budgeted each year. When forced abatement does occur, an administrative charge is added to cover the contractor’s fee as well as staff time. If payment is not received, a lien is placed on the property’s tax roll.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and Title 14, the California Code of Regulations (“CEQA Guidelines”), Section 15378 (b) (2), continued administrative actions do not qualify as a “Project”. Therefore, no further CEQA or environmental review is required. In addition, the City’s actions to abate weeds are exempt from CEQA because said actions are authorized by the Government Code, and assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment, and the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment. The City’s actions are thus exempt from environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15308.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Resolution
WeedAbatementList2022

7.C
Packet Pg. 326

CITY OF HEALDSBURG
RESOLUTION NO. ___-2022

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

HEALDSBURG ORDERING THE ABATEMENT OF WEEDS
WHEREAS, weeds, as defined by Government Code Section 39561.5, exist upon the streets, sidewalks, and private property in the City of Healdsburg; and WHEREAS, weeds on certain parcels present a menace to public health or danger to the public safety; and
WHEREAS, there are weeds on and in front of certain parcels of real property within the City of Healdsburg; and
WHEREAS, Section 51182 of the Government Code requires the maintenance of fire breaks and other vegetation clearance activities or defensible space near structures in designated Fire Severity Zones; and
WHEREAS, by performing abatement in those areas within the city identified as Fire Severity Zones, property owners can maintain compliance with State law; and WHEREAS, on May 16, 2022, the City Council declared the conditions described above to be a public nuisance in locations where such conditions were found to exist; and WHEREAS, the said nuisances existing upon properties described in “Exhibit “A”, Weed Abatement Reinspection List 2022” referenced in this Resolution and on file in the office of the City Clerk are found to be seasonal and recurrent nuisances within the meaning of Government Code Section 39562.1; and
WHEREAS, the property owners of the properties described in “Exhibit A” have been given proper notice of the nuisance condition and an opportunity to remove or eliminate the nuisance conditions, all in accordance with applicable law.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Healdsburg as follows:

1. Weeds, as defined in Section 39561.5 of the Government Code, and the failure to meet the provisions of Section 51182 of the Government Code, are hereby declared to be a public nuisance;

2. Weeds, including flammable material which endangers the public safety by creating a fire hazard on private property, are hereby declared to be a public nuisance;

7.C.a
Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Resolution (3576 : Weed Abatement Public Hearing) Resolution No. -2022

3. The abatement of said weeds on private property is hereby ordered in accordance with Government Code: Title 4, Division 3, Part 2, Chapter 13 “Weed and Rubbish Abatement” and of and Section 51182 “Very High Fire Severity Zones” or “WildlandUrban Interface Fire Area” as defined in City Municipal Code 15.08.020, Section 4902.1;

4. Said weeds shall be abated from the parcels of real property described in said “Exhibit A” and on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and seasonal recurrent nuisances shall be further abated pursuant to Sections 39562.1 and 51182;

5. Those property owners who fail to abate said nuisance from their parcel(s) by June 22, 2022, shall be subject to the nuisance being abated by the City, with the property owner being billed for the costs of abatement plus an administrative charge; and

6. Any unpaid costs of nuisance abatement shall constitute a debt owed to the City of Healdsburg and the amount of such debt shall become a special assessment and lien on the tax rolls and may be enforced in accordance with Government Code sections 39573 through 39588, inclusive.

7. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and Title 14, the California Code of Regulations (“CEQA Guidelines”), Section 15378 (b) (2), continued administrative actions do not qualify as a “Project”. Therefore, no further CEQA or environmental review is required. In addition, the City’s actions to abate weeds are exempt from CEQA because said actions are authorized by the Government Code, and assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment, and the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment. The City’s actions are thus exempt from environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15308.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of June 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers: ()
NOES: Councilmembers: ()
ABSENT: Councilmembers: ()
ABSTAINING: Councilmembers: ()
SO ORDERED: ATTEST:
_________________________________ ___________________________________ Osvaldo Jimenez, Mayor Raina Allan, City Clerk

7.C.a
Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Resolution (3576 : Weed Abatement Public Hearing) Parcel Identification Number CurrentOwnerName SitusFormatted1 InspectionDate 002-541-011 CORDER KENNETH C 511 SUNNYVALE DR 6/14/2022 002-386-001 MOLINA CARLOS 1016 SUNNYSIDE DR 6/14/2022
002-023-001 DE GHETTO ADA EST OF ET AL 809 PRINCE AVE 6/14/2022 002-051-013 DEGHETTO ADA EST OF ET AL 733 COLLEGE ST 6/14/2022 002-092-018 STAUER JANICE TR 612 HEALDSBURG AVE 6/14/2022 086-010-012 ANASTASIO ANGELO ET AL 25 GRANT AVE 6/14/2022 002-850-041 PORTOLA PROPERTIES LLC 119 POWELL AVE 6/14/2022

7.C.b
Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: WeedAbatementList2022 (3576 : Weed Abatement Public Hearing)

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: June 21, 2022
SUBJECT: Hold a Public Hearing and Set Assessments for the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District
PREPARED BY: Jaime Licea, Parks Superintendent
STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):

Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities
Provide Resident-Driven Community Services
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

1. Hold public hearing and receive public comments or protests on the Annual Engineer’s Report, the proposed budget for the Healdsburg Landscape and Lighting Assessment District (Assessment District) and annual assessments; and

2. Adopt by Resolution the Annual Engineer’s Report, confirming the assessment diagram and annual assessment amounts and the levying and collection of assessments for FY 2022-23 for the Assessment District.

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:

In February of 2021, staff created a working group of residents living in the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District that meets twice per year. The meetings offer residents an opportunity provide input on the Assessment District. The working group’s work is currently ongoing.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Healdsburg utilizes the Assessment District in accordance with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 to fund the operation and maintenance of the landscaping improvements within the public right-of-way along specific streets and the maintenance of riparian and park areas in the City. The Assessment District consists of separate zones (areas) within the City. The funding sources are parcels within each of the zones.

On March 7, 2022, the City Council began the annual required Assessment District proceedings by adopting a resolution appointing the Engineer of Work and directing the preparation and filing of the annual Engineer’s Report for FY 2022-23.

7.D
Packet Pg. 330
On May 16, 2022, the Council adopted a Resolution of Intention to levy and collect annual assessment for FY 2022-23, preliminarily approved the filed Engineer’s Report, and set the date and time for the public hearing.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

Tonight’s public hearing is the last of three City Council meetings regarding the levy and collection of FY 2022-23 assessments for the Assessment District. The Engineer’s Report being presented to the City Council for final approval is substantially the same as the Engineer’s Report preliminarily approved May 16, 2022. If approved at the conclusion of the Public Hearing, the City Council will be confirming the assessment diagram and assessment amounts as set forth in the annual Engineer’s Report and authorizing the levy and collection of annual assessments for FY 2022-23. The annual Engineer’s Report includes the description and proposed changes of each of the six existing zones, the proposed costs to operate and maintain the improvements, the method of apportionment (spread) of the assessments, the assessment roll for all parcels, and the assessment diagram of each.

The zones detailed in the Engineer’s Report are as follows:

Zone 1 – Parkland Hills Subdivision
Zone 2 – Healdsburg Estates and River’s Landing
Zone 3 – Park and Healdsburg Avenue
Zone 4 – Senior Housing Development
Zone 5 – Sonata Subdivision (Includes Grant Street Village) Zone 6 – Sorrento Square
For FY 2022-23, the estimated maximum annual assessments for all zones are proposed to increase by the allowable annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) (Year 2021) increase of +4.2%.

The annual assessment to be levied is proposed to increase for Zones 2 and 3 and to decrease for Zones 1, 4, 5 and 6. Contributions from existing reserves will be used to reduce assessments in Zones 2, 4, 5 and 6. Community Services Fund contributions will be used in Zones 3 and 6 to account for special benefits conferred upon out-of-district properties. The overall Assessment District budget has increased by approximately 0.9%.

The following table summarizes the FY 2021-22 annual assessments, the proposed actual assessments to levy and collect for FY 2022-23, and the Community Services Fund contributions.

FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23
Zones
Last Year's
Levied Annual
Assessment per
ESD
Proposed
Annual
Assessment to
Levy per ESD
Summary of Engineer's Report
Zone 1 $262.96 $261.98 No special projects
Zone 2 $48.44 $48.52 Special projects identified for this zone

7.D
Packet Pg. 331
Zone 3 $206.52 $206.84 Special projects identified for this zone
Zone 4 $119.98 $111.86
Reserve funds will be used to cover
a portion of expenses and lower
assessments
Zone 5 $670.38 $653.34
Reserve funds will be used to cover
a portion of expenses and lower
assessments
Zone 6 $555.00 $520.00
Reserve funds will be used to cover
a portion of expenses and lower
assessments
Community
Services
Fund
Contribution
$17,366.84 $17,105.90
Proportion of costs that are
considered to be a public benefit for
the District
The anticipated ending reserve funds (on June 30, 2023) in all zones are projected to be 50% of the established budget.

The adoption of tonight’s resolution is pursuant to Section 22631 of the California Streets and Highways Code
ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:

Over the years, staff and our contracted landscape contractor have migrated to more drought tolerant species when plant materials have needed to be replaced, and with the challenges of climate change, staff will continue to focus more resources on plants that will adapt to these changes.

ALTERNATIVES:

By virtue of the Streets and Highways Code (Code), the City of Healdsburg is mandated to adhere to the recommendation in the Code to file an annual Engineer’s Report. By not filing the report, the City of Healdsburg would not be in conformance with the rules and regulations of the Code and assessments could be subject to challenge. Accordingly, staff does not recommend alternatives with respect to filing the annual Engineers’ Report.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The Assessment District collects funds to support the operation and maintenance of certain areas within the City. With this year’s report, revenues from the Assessment District are estimated at $251,171.53 (total of all 6 zones.) Overall expenditures are estimated at $285,515.23. The difference between the revenues collected from the Assessment District and the overall estimated expenditures ($34,343.70) will come from available Zone reserves and Community Services Fund contributions.

7.D
Packet Pg. 332
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

Activities associated with the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District includes maintenance of existing landscaping, native growth and related facilities. Per Section 15301(h) of Article 19 in Chapter 3 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, these activities are considered Categorically Exempt.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Resolution
Engineer's Report

7.D
Packet Pg. 333

CITY OF HEALDSBURG
RESOLUTION NO. -2022

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HEALDSBURG APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER’S

REPORT, CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM AND

THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT AMOUNTS, AND

AUTHORIZING THE LEVYING AND COLLECTION OF
ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 FOR THE CITY

OF HEALDSBURG LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the City Council ordered the formation of the Healdsburg Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District (Assessment District) on November 4, 1996, to levy and collect assessments pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, the City Council intends to levy and collect assessments within the Assessment District during FY 2022-23, and the lands to be assessed are located in the City of Healdsburg, Sonoma County; and
WHEREAS, on March 7, 2022, the City Council adopted a resolution appointing Coastland Civil Engineering as the Engineer of Work, directing the preparation and filing of the annual Engineer’s Report, and describing the potential changes to the Assessment District for FY 2022-23; and
WHEREAS, Coastland Civil Engineering prepared and filed with the City Clerk the annual Engineer’s Report for FY 2022-23 as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and
WHEREAS, on May 16, 2022, the City Council adopted a resolution of intention to levy and collect assessments, preliminarily approving the Engineer’s Report for FY 2022-23 and setting the time and date of the public hearing pursuant to Section 22624 of the Streets and Highways Code; and
WHEREAS, the operations and maintenance to be made to the improvements for the upcoming FY 2022-23 in the Assessment District are generally described as follows:

Zone 1 – The operation, maintenance and other incidental costs associated with back-on street landscaping, riparian areas, and weed abatement areas (including the detention basin) within the Parkland Hills Subdivision (includes Quarry Ridge) and the Foss Creek Restoration Project.

Zone 2 – The operation, maintenance and other incidental costs associated with weed abatement along Paul Wittke Drive fronting Healdsburg Estates and River’s Landing.

7.D.a
Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Resolution (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) Resolution No. -2022

Zone 3 – The operation, maintenance and other incidental costs associated with the Barbieri Brothers Park and landscaping on multiple reaches along the east side of Healdsburg Avenue, located within Area A as defined in the Second Amended Engineer’s Report for the North Healdsburg Avenue Specific Plan Area A Assessment District.

Zone 4 – The operation, maintenance and other incidental costs associated with the back-on street landscaping located within the Senior Housing development along Parkland Farms Boulevard frontage.

Zone 5 – The operation, maintenance and other incidental costs associated with the back-on street landscaping and a creek-side trail located along Larkspur Drive within the Sonata and the previously known Grant Street Village developments; and Zone 6 – The operation, maintenance and other incidental costs associated with the back-on street landscaping along Healdsburg Avenue and a small pocket park along Monte Vista Avenue within the Sorrento Square development; and
WHEREAS, all interested persons are referred to the Engineer’s Report for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the proposed operation and maintenance costs, the boundaries of the Zones of the Assessment District and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the Assessment District; and WHEREAS, in order to keep up with inflation, the maximum annual assessments for Zones 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 are proposed to be increased by the 2021 Consumer Price Index (CPI) of +4.2%, the annual CPI is based on the All Urban Consumers (San Francisco Area) CPI from the U. S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics; and WHEREAS, the new maximum annual assessments that can be assessed will be $294.91 per Equivalent Single-Family Dwelling Unit (ESD) in Zone 1, $188.80 per ESD in Zone 2, $244.65 per ESD in Zone 3; $276.21 per ESD in Zone 4; $880.51 per ESD in Zone 5; $855.25 per ESD in Zone 6, plus any allowable future annual CPI increases; and WHEREAS, the proposed FY 2022-23 amount to actually levy and collect in Zones 1 through 6 inclusive, include $261.18 per ESD for Zone 1, $48.52 per ESD for Zone 2, $206.84 per ESD for Zone 3, $111.76 per ESD for Zone 4, $653.34 per ESD for Zone 5, and $520.00 per ESD for Zone 6; and
WHEREAS, notice of the June 21, 2022, public protest hearing was given by publication in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, on June 21, 2022, the City Council conducted a public hearing and gave every interested person an opportunity to make a protest to the annual Engineer's Report either in writing or orally, and the City Council has considered each protest; and

7.D.a
Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: Resolution (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) Resolution No. -2022

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves the filed Engineer’s Report, confirms the assessment diagram and assessment amounts as set forth in the annual Engineer’s Report including the increase in the Maximum Annual Assessment for each Zone by the 2021 CPI of 4.2%, and any amendments incorporated at the City Council’s direction, and authorizes the levy and collection of the annual assessments for:

Zone 1 – Parkland Hills (includes Quarry Ridge) Street Landscaping; Zone 2 – Healdsburg Estates & River’s Landing Street Landscaping; Zone 3 – Park and Healdsburg Avenue Landscaping;
Zone 4 – Senior Housing Street Landscaping; and
Zone 5 – Sonata Subdivision (includes Grant Street Village) Zone 6 – Sorrento Square
as set forth in such report for FY 2022-23, that this resolution is adopted pursuant to Section 22631 of the Streets and Highways Code; and
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of June 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers: ( )
NOES: Councilmembers: ( )
ABSENT: Councilmembers: ( )
ABSTAINING: Councilmembers: ( )
SO ORDERED: ATTEST:
__________________________________ ____________________________________ Osvaldo Jimenez, Mayor Raina Allan, City Clerk

7.D.a
Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Resolution (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) City of Healdsburg
County of Sonoma
State of California
FY 2022-23

ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT

HEALDSBURG LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
For Final Approval
June 2022
Prepared By:

Coastland Civil Engineering, Inc.

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) FY 2022-23

HEALDSBURG LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
The undersigned respectfully submits, as directed by the City Council on March 7, 2022, the enclosed Engineer’s Report on the 21st day of June, 2022.

COASTLAND CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC.

By:___________________________________
John L. Wanger, RCE 43148, Exp. 3/31/24

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessments and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with the City on the day of ___________ , 2022.

Raina Allan, City Clerk, City of Healdsburg,
Sonoma County, California
By:___________________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessments and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Healdsburg, California, on the __ day of _______________, 2022.

Raina Allan, City Clerk, City of Healdsburg,
Sonoma County, California
By:___________________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessments and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Sonoma on the day of , 2022.

Raina Allan, City Clerk, City of Healdsburg,
Sonoma County, California

By:____________________________________

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 3 FY 2022-23 ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT

HEALDSBURG LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
(Pursuant to the Landscaping & Lighting Act of 1972)
Coastland Civil Engineering, Engineer of Work for the Healdsburg Landscaping & Lighting Assessment District, City of Healdsburg, Sonoma County, California, makes this annual Engineer’s Report, as directed on March 7th, 2022, by the City Council, pursuant to Sections 22565 and 22620 of the California Streets & Highways Code for the Healdsburg Landscaping & Lighting Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2022-23.

Background
The Healdsburg Landscaping & Lighting Assessment District was formed in November 1996, by the City Council to cover costs associated with the operation and maintenance of landscaping within specific public rights-of-way along City streets and the maintenance of riparian and park areas within specific areas in the northern part of the City. As new subdivisions and parks are built within the City of Healdsburg, they may be annexed into existing Zones or as new Zone(s) of the Assessment District on an annual basis.

Pursuant to the Landscaping & Lighting Act of 1972 (Act), an annual Engineer’s Report must be prepared and filed in order to levy and collect assessments the following fiscal year. In the annual Engineer’s Report, cost estimates for operation and maintenance of the facilities and new assessments are developed each year. The original 1996 formation proceedings included the estimated maximum annual assessment amount of each Zone.

Also, in order to take inflation into account and to recognize noticing/voting requirements for increasing the maximum annual assessments under the provisions of this Act, the original formation proceedings of this Assessment District included allowances for an annual increase to the estimated maximum annual assessment in accordance with the annual Consumer Price Index (CPI). The annual CPI is based on the All-Urban Consumers (San Francisco Area) CPI from the U.

S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. An annual CPI increase to the assessment is not mandatory. Therefore, if the annual Engineer’s Report recommends any assessment up to the sum of the prior year’s maximum annual assessment plus an adjustment up to the latest annual CPI, notices shall not be required to be sent nor shall a vote be required from the impacted property owners. If, however, the annual Engineer’s Report recommends any assessment that exceeds the sum of the prior years’ maximum annual assessment plus an adjustment up to the latest annual CPI, noticing and/or voting shall be required from the impacted property owners in accordance with the provisions applicable to the Act.

Annual Reserve Policy
In FY 2009-10, an annual reserve policy was adopted requiring that 75-100% of the annual operating budget be held in reserve for each zone to cover unanticipated expenses and funding delays. In FY 2022-23, the City Council adjusted the annual reserve requirement down to 50% of the annual operating budget. When annual reserves exceed the 50% allowance, excess annual

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 4 reserves may be used to reduce the zone’s annual assessment and/or be transferred to the zone’s Long-Term Capital Reserve for future long-term maintenance projects.

Long-Term Capital Reserves
In FY 2016-17, when the Sorrento Square Subdivision was annexed into the assessment district as Zone 6, a Long-Term Capital Reserve Fund was formed for Zone 6 to collect annual contributions towards long-term maintenance projects such as tree pruning and replacement of plantings, soil amendments, mulch and irrigation. Pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 22660, money for non-annual budget items may be collected through annual installments that the City will place in a fund specific for the work. In FY 2022-23, Long-Term Capital Reserves were also created for Zones 1, 3, 4 and 5. Zone 2 does not require a Long-Term Capital Reserve fund.

Within this report, a discussion of each zone’s Long-Term Capital Reserve is included that provides a description of the long-term projects to be funded and their budgets, the number of years needed to accumulate the total budget, and the annual contribution to be made to the Long-Term Capital Reserve. The estimated balance of the Long-Term Capital Reserve is included in the Fund Balance Section of each zone in Part B of this Report.

Proposition 218 and Special Benefits
In 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218 which grants local governments the ability to create assessment districts, and to levy and collect assessments. The purpose of an assessment district is to create and maintain improvements that provide special benefits to the parcels within the district. This law stipulates that a parcel’s assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred upon that parcel. “Special benefit” is defined as “a particular and distinct benefit over and above any general benefits conferred upon the public at large.

The Annual Engineer’s Report must identify the special benefits conferred upon assessed parcels through the improvements and services funded by the Assessment District. The Report must also identify any general benefit conferred upon the public at large by those same improvements and services (“improvements and services” primarily refers to landscaping or lighting in identified areas and the operation and maintenance thereof.) The annual costs of the assessed improvements and services must be apportioned between special and general benefits. The costs attributed to a general benefit may not be assessed.

In general, the special benefits provided by maintained landscaping within each area include:
 Enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements,  Improved aesthetic appeal of the neighborhood,
 Improved air quality from additional vegetation, and/or  Improved fire safety through weed abatement.

In general, the special benefits provided by maintained lighting within each area include:
 Enhanced pedestrian safety,
 Enhanced vehicle safety, and

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 5  Enhanced security to properties.

In general, the special benefits provided by parks are:
 A nearby location for recreational activities,
 Improved aesthetic appeal of the neighborhood,
 Improved air quality from additional vegetation, and
 Open space.

Each parcel within a zone receives a particular and distinct special benefit from the maintenance of the landscaping, park, and/or lighting within that zone even though the landscaping or lighting may not be adjacent to each parcel. Although members of the public may walk or drive through a zone and appreciate the aesthetic appeal of the maintained landscaping, this does not necessarily confer a general benefit to the public at large.

In the case where assessed improvements confer both special benefits to the parcels of a zone as well as general benefits to the public at large, the portion of each type of benefit must be quantified, and the costs apportioned accordingly. The discussion of such conditions, should they occur, is presented in Section D.

Fiscal Year 2022-23
There are no proposed annexations to the Assessment District this year.

For FY 2022-23, the total proposed Assessment District budget is $285,515.23, which is a 0.9% increase over last year. The proposed funding amounts by source are: $251,171.53 from FY 2022-23 assessment revenues, $17,237.80 from existing Assessment District reserves and $17,105.90 from Community Services Fund contributions.

For FY 2022-23, the proposed annual assessment to be levied and collected in Zones 2 and 3 are proposed to increase over FY 2021-22, while the proposed annual assessments to be levied and collected in Zones 1, 4, 5 and 6 are proposed to decrease.

This report recommends that the FY 2022-23 maximum annual assessment for each Zone be increased by the allowed latest annual (Year 2021) CPI of +4.20%. This will give the City the ability to keep up with inflation, as needed.

Table 1, below, summarizes the proposed FY 2022-23 annual assessments to levy and collect and the new estimated maximum annual assessments allowed to be assessed.

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 6 Table 1: Proposed FY 2022-23 Annual Assessments
Zone
Proposed
Maximum
Annual
Assessment
Proposed Actual
Assessment per
ESD
Zone 1 $294.91 $261.18
Zone 2 $188.80 $48.52
Zone 3 $244.65 $206.84
Zone 4 $276.21 $111.76
Zone 5 $880.51 $653.34
Zone 6 $855.25 $520.00
During these annual proceedings new budgets are developed for each zone to determine the costs to operate and maintain the Assessment District improvements for the upcoming fiscal year.

The California Constitution made several changes in State law which impact Assessment Districts.

By virtue of Article XIII D (sometimes referred to as Proposition 218), Section 4, property owners may express their support or opposition to a proposed assessment increase by ballot. Per Section 4, ballots are required to be sent out for annexations into an existing Zone within the Assessment District, for new Zones that are added into the Assessment District or for other proposed changes causing an increase over the maximum annual assessments (above the allowed annual CPI increases). The balloting is limited to only those property owners directly impacted by those proposed changes to the Assessment District. For FY 2022-23, no balloting is required.

Zone 1 – Parkland Hills Subdivision (Including Quarry Ridge) Zone 1 was created to recover the costs associated with the operation and maintenance of backon landscaping of several streets, several weed abatement areas and re-vegetation of a riparian area located within Parkland Hills Subdivision (including Quarry Ridge). More specifically, assessments pay for the operation and maintenance costs associated with street landscaping of Parkland Farms Blvd., Canyon Run, Saddle Draw, Bridle Path, several weed abatement areas, maintenance of the riparian area (Foss Creek Relocation / Renovation Area), and water and electric utility costs associated with the landscaping maintenance and administrative costs. All Zone 1 landscaping improvements have been constructed.

The Parkland Hills Subdivision was constructed in phases. In Phases 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10A and 10B, most residences have been built. The Quarry Ridge Subdivision, formerly known as Parcel A, was subdivided into 21 lots and is currently built out. Twenty of the twenty-one lots were sold to private parties for partial self-construction of single-family residences, similar to a “sweat equity” arrangement. On the last lot, lot 21, 51 apartment units were built. Parkland Hills, Parcel B, owned by the City of Healdsburg Redevelopment Agency, was previously designated for development with affordable housing units. In FY 2004-05, it was developed into 15 lots and is currently built out. There are no annexations into Zone 1 for FY 2022-23.

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 7 The Zone 1 annual assessment, which will be levied on each parcel, is dependent on the development status (vacant, single-family dwelling, multiple dwelling units, etc.) which determines the equivalent single-family dwelling units (ESD) of a particular parcel. The number of ESDs has not changed from last year. See Part D, Method of Apportionment of Assessment for a description of the manner that the assessment has been apportioned to each parcel.

In FY 2022-23, a Long-Term Capital Reserve Fund was created for Zone 1 to collect annual contributions towards long-term maintenance projects including the replacement of plantings, soil amendments, mulch, and irrigation. The total budget for the proposed long-term projects is $240,000. It is anticipated that these funds will need to be expended every 15 years, or as otherwise needed. The annual contribution to the Long-Term Capital Reserve Fund is expected to be $16,000, or as annual budgets allow. The estimated balance of the Long-Term Capital Reserve is included in the Fund Balance Section of Zone 1 in Part B of this Report.

For FY 2022-23, a budget of $98,856.63 is proposed for Zone 1. This is a decrease of approximately 4% from the FY 2021-22 budget. The proposed Zone 1 annual assessment to be levied and collected for FY 2022-23 is $261.18 per ESD, which is a $1.78 reduction from last year.

Due to this year’s change in annual reserve policy, $57,044.00 of excess annual reserve funds were transferred to the Zone 1 Long-Term Capital Reserve. The anticipated ending reserve balance for FY 2022-23 is estimated to be 50% of the annual operating budget.

To keep up with inflation, the maximum annual assessment is proposed to increase for FY 2022- 23 as shown in Table 1, above. See Part B of this Engineer’s Report for Zone 1 budget details determined in accordance with Section 22569 of the Streets and Highways Code.

For FY 2022-23, California Constitution Article XIII D, Section 4 balloting requirements do not impact Zone 1.

Zone 2 - Healdsburg Estates and River’s Landing Subdivisions Zone 2 provides funding for the operation and maintenance of weed abatement areas along Paul Witke Drive. The Zone 2 annual assessment, which will be levied on each parcel, is dependent on the development status (vacant, single-family dwelling, multiple dwelling units, etc.) of the particular parcel. All lots within Healdsburg Estates and River’s Landing Subdivisions have been developed with residential dwellings. Build-out was reached in FY 2008-09. There are no annexations into Zone 2 for FY 2022-23.

The Zone 2 annual assessment, which will be levied on each parcel, is dependent on the development status (vacant, single-family dwelling, multiple dwelling units, etc.) which determines the equivalent single-family dwelling units (ESD) of a particular parcel. The number of ESDs has not changed from last year. See Part D, Method of Apportionment of Assessment for a description of the manner that the assessment has been apportioned to each parcel.

For FY 2022-23, a budget of $9,649.00 is proposed for Zone 2. This is an increase of approximately 40% from the FY 2021-22 budget due to planned mulching of high-weed areas. Zone 2 annual

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 8 reserve funds in the amount of $6,737.80 will be used to cover a portion of the budget expenses.

The proposed Zone 2 annual assessment for FY 2022-23 is $48.52 per ESD, which is $0.08 higher than last year. The anticipated ending reserve balance for FY 2022-23 is estimated to be 50% of the annual operating budget.

To keep up with inflation, the maximum annual assessment is proposed to increase for FY 2022- 23 as shown in Table 1, above. See Part B of this Engineer’s Report for Zone 2 budget details determined in accordance with Section 22569 of the Streets and Highways Code.

For FY 2022-23, California Constitution Article XIII D, Section 4 balloting requirements do not impact Zone 2.

Zone 3 – Barbieri Brothers Park and Healdsburg Avenue Frontage Landscaping Zone 3 provides funding for the operation and maintenance of Barbieri Brothers Park located within the Parkland Hills Subdivision as well as the frontage landscaping along the east side of Healdsburg Avenue within Area A (For the specific boundary of Area A, see the Second Amended Engineer’s Report North Healdsburg Avenue Specific Plan Area A Assessment District, City of Healdsburg, Sonoma County, CA, dated June 19, 1995, and amended August 7, 1995, and August 21, 1995). The existing retaining wall within the landscaped area was constructed by the City as part of the widening of Healdsburg Avenue. The Assessment District is not responsible for the maintenance of the retaining wall. Barbieri Brothers Park is designated as mitigation for park area within North Healdsburg Avenue Specific Plan Area A Assessment District. Barbieri Brothers Park was completed, and the grand opening was held in April 2005. Assessments for all parcels within Area A are determined for Zone 3. The parcels that have not yet been annexed into the assessment district have their share of special benefits covered by a Community Services Fund contribution. The Assessment District subdivisions within Zone 3 are: Parkland Hills, Quarry Ridge, Healdsburg Estates, Ridgeline, Sienna Pointe, Fanny Hill Estates, Senior Housing, River’s Landing, Rosewood Creek and Rosewood Heights. There are no annexations into Zone 3 for FY 2022-23.

The Zone 3 annual assessment, which will be levied on each parcel, is dependent on the development status (vacant, single-family dwelling, multiple dwelling units, etc.) which determines the equivalent single-family dwelling units (ESD) of a particular parcel. The number of ESDs has not changed from last year. See Part D, Method of Apportionment of Assessment for a description of the manner that the assessment has been apportioned to each parcel and how the Community Services Fund contribution level was determined.

In FY 2022-23, a Long-Term Capital Reserve Fund was created for Zone 3 to collect annual contributions towards long-term maintenance projects including the replacement of plantings, soil amendments, mulch, and irrigation. The total budget for the proposed long-term projects is $99,000. It is anticipated that these funds will need to be expended every 15 years, or as otherwise needed. The annual contribution to the Long-Term Capital Reserve Fund is expected to be $6,600, or as annual budgets allow. The estimated balance of the Long-Term Capital Reserve is included in the Fund Balance Section of Zone 3 in Part B of this Report.

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 9 For FY 2022-23, a budget of $111,692.28 is proposed for Zone 3, which is an increase of less than one percent over last year. A Community Services Fund contribution of $6,824.40 will be used to cover a portion of the budget expenses. A budget of $37,000 has been set aside for current year projects in Zone 3 which will include fire fuel reduction work, tree maintenance, mulching and irrigation repairs. The proposed Zone 3 annual assessment for FY 2022-23 is $206.84 per ESD, which is $0.32 higher than last year. Due to this year’s change in annual reserve policy, $28,045.73 of excess annual reserve funds were transferred to the Zone 3 Long-Term Capital Reserve. The estimated general reserve at the end of the fiscal year is anticipated to be 50% of the annual operating budget.

To keep up with inflation, the maximum annual assessment is proposed to increase for FY 2022- 23 as shown in Table 1, above. See Part B of this Engineer’s Report for Zone 3 budget details determined in accordance with Section 22569 of the Streets and Highways Code.

For FY 2022-23, California Constitution Article XIII D, Section 4 balloting requirements do not impact Zone 3.

Zone 4 – Senior Housing
Zone 4 was created to provide funding for the operation and maintenance of landscaping fronting a senior housing development along Parkland Farms Boulevard. The senior housing development contains 24 single-family dwelling units. The parcels are fully build out and there have been no land use changes since last year.

The Zone 4 annual assessment, which will be levied on each parcel, is dependent on the development status (vacant, single-family dwelling, multiple dwelling units, etc.) which determines the equivalent single-family dwelling units (ESD) of a particular parcel. The number of ESDs has not changed from last year. See Part D, Method of Apportionment of Assessment for a description of the manner that the assessment has been apportioned to each parcel.

In FY 2022-23, a Long-Term Capital Reserve Fund was created for Zone 4 to collect annual contributions towards long-term maintenance projects including the replacement of plantings, soil amendments, mulch, and irrigation. The total budget for the proposed long-term projects is $35,000. It is anticipated that these funds will need to be expended every 20 years, or as otherwise needed. The annual contribution to the Long-Term Capital Reserve Fund is expected to be $1,750, or as annual budgets allow. The estimated balance of the Long-Term Capital Reserve is included in the Fund Balance Section of Zone 3 in Part B of this Report.

For FY 2022-23, a budget of $9,182.24 is proposed for Zone 4. This is an increase of 56% from the FY 2021-22 budget due to increased maintenance needs and the addition of annual contributions to the newly created Long-Term Capital Reserve. Zone 4 annual reserve funds in the amount of $6,500.00 will be used to cover a portion of the budget expenses. The proposed Zone 4 annual assessment for FY 2022-23 is $111.76 per ESD, an $8.22 reduction from last year.

Due to this year’s change in annual reserve policy, $706.00 of excess annual reserve funds were transferred to the Zone 4 Long-Term Capital Reserve. The estimated annual reserve at the end of the fiscal year is anticipated to be 50% of the annual operating budget.

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 10 To keep up with inflation, the maximum annual assessment is proposed to increase for FY 2022- 23 as shown in Table 1, above. See Part B of this Engineer’s Report for Zone 4 budget details determined in accordance with Section 22569 of the Streets and Highways Code.

For FY 2022-23, California Constitution Article XIII D, Section 4 balloting requirements do not impact Zone 4.

Zone 5 – Sonata Subdivision (includes Grant Street Village) Zone 5 provides funding for the operation and maintenance of a trail along Foss Creek and landscaping along Larkspur Drive within Grant Street Village.

In FY 2008-09, a proposed 40-lot subdivision, Grant Street Village, was annexed into a new Zone 5. Grant Street Village was never completed. As there were no accepted City improvements in this Zone, assessments were set to zero in FY 2010-11 and continued at that level through FY 2012-13.

During 2013, a new map, Sonata Subdivision, was recorded for the undeveloped area. This map reduced the overall number of lots to 37 and added a small pocket park. The pocket park is used as a waiting area for a bus stop and a public art display area. This pocket park area has been deemed a general benefit to the City at large. Maintenance and upkeep are paid for by the City with other funding. The maintenance requirements and utility costs associated with the proposed trail and landscaping improvements along Larkspur Drive remained unchanged.

Due to the maintenance requirements and the reduced number of parcels, a new maximum annual assessment was established in FY 2013-14 according to CC Article XIII D, Section 4 noticing/voting requirements.

The Zone 5 annual assessment, which will be levied on each parcel, is dependent on the development status (vacant, single-family dwelling, multiple dwelling units, etc.) which determines the equivalent single-family dwelling units (ESD) of a particular parcel. The number of ESDs has not changed from last year. See Part D, Method of Apportionment of Assessment for a description of the manner that the assessment has been apportioned to each parcel.

In FY 2022-23, a Long-Term Capital Reserve Fund was created for Zone 5 to collect annual contributions towards long-term maintenance projects including the replacement of plantings, soil amendments, mulch, and irrigation. The total budget for the proposed long-term projects is $108,000. It is anticipated that these funds will need to be expended every 20 years, or as otherwise needed. The annual contribution to the Long-Term Capital Reserve Fund is expected to be $5,400, or as annual budgets allow. The estimated balance of the Long-Term Capital Reserve is included in the Fund Balance Section of Zone 5 in Part B of this Report.

For FY 2022-23, a budget of $26,173.58 is proposed for Zone 5. This is an increase of 6% from the FY 2021-22 budget. Zone 5 annual reserve funds in the amount of $2,000.00 will be used to cover a portion of the budget expenses. The proposed Zone 5 assessment for FY 2022-23 is

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 11 $653.34 per ESD, a $17.04 reduction from last year. Due to this year’s change in annual reserve policy, $14,440.00 of excess annual reserve funds were transferred to the Zone 5 Long-Term Capital Reserve. The estimated general reserve at the end of the fiscal year is anticipated to be 50% of the annual operating budget.

To keep up with inflation, the maximum annual assessment is proposed to increase for FY 2022- 23 as shown in Table 1, above. See Part B of this Engineer’s Report for Zone 5 budget details determined in accordance with Section 22569 of the Streets and Highways Code.

For FY 2022-23, California Constitution Article XIII D, Section 4 balloting requirements do not impact Zone 5.

Zone 6 – Sorrento Square Subdivision
In FY 2016-17, Sorrento Square Subdivision, a 34-lot subdivision, was annexed into a new Zone 6.

All of the homes in this subdivision have been built. Zone 6 was created to provide funding for the operation and maintenance of back-on street landscaping along Healdsburg Avenue at Sorrento Square and landscaping, lighting, and other related costs for a small pocket park within the subdivision along Monte Vista Avenue. Landscape maintenance in the pocket park includes the maintenance of tables and benches, a drinking fountain (including water costs), a concrete retaining wall and sidewalks within the pocket park. The Healdsburg Avenue frontage improvements being maintained by this zone are not within the previously mentioned Area A.

The Zone 6 annual assessment, for each parcel, is dependent on the development status (vacant, single-family dwelling, multiple dwelling units, etc.) which determines the equivalent singlefamily dwelling units (ESD) of a particular parcel. The number of ESDs has not changed from last year. Parcels that receive a special benefit from the pocket park but have not been annexed into the assessment district have their share of benefit costs covered by a Community Services Fund contribution. See Part D, Method of Apportionment of Assessment for a description of the manner that the assessment has been apportioned to each parcel and a description of how the Community Services Fund contribution level was determined.

In FY 2016-17, a Long-Term Capital Reserve Fund was created for Zone 6 to collect annual contributions towards long-term maintenance projects including the replacement of plantings, soil amendments, mulch, and irrigation. The total budget for the proposed long-term projects is $80,000. It is anticipated that these funds will need to be expended every 20 years, or as otherwise needed. The annual contribution to the Long-Term Capital Reserve Fund is expected to be $4,000, or as annual budgets allow. The estimated balance of the Long-Term Capital Reserve is included in the Fund Balance Section of Zone 5 in Part B of this Report.

For FY 2022-23 a budget of $29,961.50 has been proposed for Zone 6. This is a decrease of approximately 5% from the FY 2021-22 budget. A Community Services Fund contribution of $10,281.50, and a Zone 6 annual reserve fund contribution of $2,000.00 will be used to cover a portion of the budget expenses. The proposed Zone 6 assessment for FY 2022-23 is $520.00 per ESD, a $35.00 decrease from last year. Due to this year’s change in annual reserve policy, $17,216.00 of excess annual reserve funds were transferred to the Zone 6 Long-Term Capital

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 12 Reserve. The estimated general reserve at the end of the fiscal year is anticipated to be 50% of the annual operating budget.

To keep up with inflation, the maximum annual assessment is proposed to increase for FY 2022- 23 as shown in Table 1, above. See Part B of this Engineer’s Report for Zone 6 budget details determined in accordance with Section 22569 of the Streets and Highways Code.

For FY 2022-23, California Constitution Article XIII D, Section 4 balloting requirements do not impact Zone 6.

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 13 FY 2022-23 Engineer’s Report Format
This FY 2022-23 Engineer’s Report consists of the following parts:

PART A Plans - This portion of the Engineer’s Report describes any plans and specifications that may be needed for the installation of improvements. If plans and specifications exist, they are filed with the City Clerk. Although separately bound, the plans and specifications are part of this Engineer’s Report and are included in it by reference.

PART B Budget Cost Estimate – Budget cost estimates associated with the operations and maintenance of the described improvements for each of the Zones. In addition to an overall budget summary for all Zones, a detailed FY 2022-23 Budget and a FY 2022-23 Summary of Fund Balance is provided for each of the Zones.

PART C Assessment Roll – A listing of the assessment on each benefited parcel of land in each of the Zones within the Assessment District. The assessment amount is the estimated cost each parcel will contribute towards the operation and maintenance of the improvements within the Assessment District for FY 2022-23.

PART D Method of Apportionment of Assessment – A statement of the method used by the Engineer of Work to determine the proposed amount to be assessed against each parcel within the Assessment District.

PART E Property Owners List – The names and addresses of the owners of real property listed within this Assessment District, as shown on the last equalized assessment roll for taxes. Assessor Parcel Number (APN) keys the list into the Assessment Roll of Part C.

PART F Assessment Diagram – Diagrams (maps) showing all of the parcels of real property within each of the Zones of the Assessment District. The assessment number keys the diagram to Part C – Assessment Roll.

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 14 PART A

PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The Assessment District proposes to operate and maintain the landscaping improvements, weed abatement areas, pocket parks, and riparian area located in specific public rights-of-way, once it has been installed by the development and accepted by the City, located in specific public rightsof-way of the various subdivisions, developments and improvement areas in this assessment district. In addition, the Assessment District developed the improvement plans and specifications for a park located in Parkland Hills Subdivision (now known as Barbieri Brothers Park).

Maintenance in each of the Zones may include repair, removal or replacement of any landscape improvement, damaged irrigation facilities or diseased landscaping, weed and brush clearing and all other allowable maintenance items including Section 22531 of the California Streets and Highways Code for the life of the Assessment District.

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 15 PART B
FY 2022-23 BUDGET COST ESTIMATE
In the attached sheets you will find the detailed budgets for Fiscal Year 2022-23 for all those costs associated with the operation and maintenance of each of the Zones within the Assessment District. The budgets have been separated by Zone for clarity. The total budget summary for FY 2022-23 for the Healdsburg Landscaping & Lighting Assessment District is as follows:

Zone As Filed
with the City
As Preliminarily
Approved
As Finally Approved
at the Public
Hearing
Zone 1 $98,856.63 $98,856.63 $
Zone 2 $9,649.00 $9,649.00 $
Zone 3 $111,692.28 $111,692.28 $
Zone 4 $9,182.24 $9,182.24 $
Zone 5 $26,173.58 $26,173.58 $
Zone 6 $29,961.50 $29,961.50 $
Total $285,515.23 $285,515.23 $
A breakdown of the total FY 2022-23 budget, revenue source amounts, and anticipated starting fiscal year reserve per Zone is as follows:

Zone
Estimated
Starting
Reserves
Budget Assessment
Revenue
Reserves
Used
Community
Services Fund
for Special
Benefit
Zone 1 $40,970.03 $98,856.63 $98,856.63 $0.00 $0.00
Zone 2 $11,532.30 $9,649.00 $2,911.20 $6,737.80 $0.00
Zone 3 $51,926.14 $111,692.28 $104,867.88 $0.00 $6,824.40 Zone 4 $10,171.36 $9,182.24 $2,682.24 $6,500.00 $0.00
Zone 5 $12,188.67 $26,173.58 $24,173.58 $2,000.00 $0.00 Zone 6 $14,720.00 $29,961.50 $17,680.00 $2,000.00 $10,281.50 Total $141,508.50 $285,515.23 $251,171.53 $17,237.80 $17,105.90

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) Estimated Budget
2021-22 2022-23
Landscaping
City Staff Salaries and Benefits $15,915.00 $12,200.46
Insurance $9,366.00 $2,264.65
Contract/Professional Services $41,540.00 $35,640.00
Repairs and Maintenance $2,000.00 $500.00
Rentals and Leases (Previously Equipment and Supplies) $500.00 $500.00 Long Term Capital Reserve
Contribution towards Future Projects $0.00 $16,000.00
Current Year Projects
Zone 1 Projects $0.00 $0.00
Utility Costs
Utility Services (Includes both Water and Electric) $13,500.00 $13,600.00 County Fee $15.00 $15.00
Subtotal $82,836.00 $80,720.11
Assessment Engineering $5,735.10 $5,620.31
City Administration (including audit) $9,813.00 $8,477.80 Contingency $4,146.26 $4,038.41
Total Expenses $102,530.36 $98,856.63
Less Annual Reserve Fund Expenditures $3,000.00 $0.00
Less Long Term Capital Reserve Fund Expenditures $0.00 $0.00 Total Costs $99,530.36 $98,856.63
Total Revenue $99,530.36 $98,856.63
Total Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Units (ESD) 378.5 378.5 Proposed Fiscal Year Assessment per ESD $262.96 $261.18 Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD
for Zone 1, FY 2021-22 with allowed CPI increase of: 2.00% $283.02 Current Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD
for Zone 1, FY 2022-23 with allowed CPI increase of: 4.20% $294.91 Healdsburg Landscape and Lighting
Assessment District
Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget
Zone 1 - Parkland Hills Subdivision (Includes Quarry Ridge) 2022-H-LLAD.xlsx 16 4/28/2022

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 2022-23
Estimated Annual Reserve Fund as of July 1 $40,970.03
* Estimated Long Term Capital Reserve Fund as of July 1 $57,044.00 Estimated Annual Revenue $82,856.63
Estimated Long Term Capital Revenue $16,000.00
Estimated Interest Earned $425.00
Total Estimated Funds Available $197,295.66
Estimated Annual Expenditures $82,856.63
Estimated Long Term Capital Expenditures $0.00
Estimated Annual Reserve as of June 30 $41,395.03
Estimated Long Term Capital Reserve Fund as of June 30 $73,044.00 * For FY 2022-23, $57,044.00 of excess Annual Reserve Funds were shifted to the Long Term Capital Reserve Fund.

Assessment District
Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget
Zone 1 - Parkland Hills Subdivision
Summary of Fund Balance
Healdsburg Landscape and Lighting
2022-H-LLAD.xlsx 17 4/28/2022

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) Estimated Budget
2021-22 2022-23
Landscaping
City Staff Salaries and Benefits $2,370.00 $2,952.93
Insurance $1,140.00 $150.98
Contract/Professional Services $290.00 $0.00
Repairs and Maintenance $1,000.00 $0.00
Rentals and Leases (Previously Equipment and Supplies) $0.00 $0.00 Current Year Projects
Zone 2 Projects $0.00 $3,900.00
Utility Costs
Utility Services (Includes both Water and Electric) $0.00 $676.00 County Fee $58.00 $58.00
Subtotal $4,858.00 $7,737.91
Assessment Engineering $374.00 $526.03
City Administration (including audit) $1,184.00 $610.47 Contingency $490.40 $774.59
Total Expenses $6,906.40 $9,649.00
Less Annual Reserve Fund Expenditures $4,000.00 $6,737.80 Total Costs $2,906.40 $2,911.20
Total Revenue $2,906.40 $2,911.20
Total Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Units (ESD) 60.0 60.0 Proposed Fiscal Year Assessment per ESD $48.44 $48.52
Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD
for Zone 2, FY 2021-22 with allowed CPI increase of: 2.00% $181.19 Current Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD
for Zone 2, FY 2022-23 with allowed CPI increase of: 4.20% $188.80 Assessment District
Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget
Zone 2 - Healdsburg Estates & River's Landing Subdivisions Healdsburg Landscape and Lighting
2022-H-LLAD.xlsx 18 4/28/2022

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 2022-23
Estimated Annual Reserve Fund as of July 1 $11,532.30
Estimated Annual Revenue $2,911.20
Estimated Interest Earned $30.00
Total Estimated Funds Available $14,473.50
Estimated Annual Expenditures $9,649.00
Estimated Annual Reserve Balance as of June 30 $4,824.50 Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget
Zone 2 - Healdsburg Estates & River's Landing Subdivisions Summary of Fund Balance
Healdsburg Landscape and Lighting
Assessment District
2022-H-LLAD.xlsx 19 4/28/2022

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) Estimated Budget
2021-22 2022-23
Landscaping
City Staff Salaries and Benefits $16,663.00 $7,062.94
Insurance $15,000.00 $905.86
Contract/Professional Services $42,710.00 $27,010.00
Repairs and Maintenance $1,000.00 $1,000.00
Rentals and Leases (Previously Equipment and Supplies) $0.00 $0.00 Rental Equipment $0.00 $0.00
Long Term Capital Reserve
Contribution towards Future Projects $0.00 $6,600.00
Current Year Projects
Zone 3 Projects $0.00 $37,000.00
Utility Costs
Utility Services (Includes both Water and Electric) $17,000.00 $18,000.00 County Fee $800.00 $623.00
Subtotal $93,173.00 $98,201.80
Assessment Engineering $6,446.60 $6,561.93
City Administration (including audit) $10,969.00 $5,940.19 Contingency $930.88 $988.36
Total Expenses $111,519.48 $111,692.28
Less Community Services Funding for Special Benefit $6,813.84 $6,824.40 Less Annual Reserve Fund Expenditures $0.00 $0.00
Less Long Term Capital Reserve Fund Expenditures $0.00 $0.00 Total Costs $104,705.64 $104,867.88
Total Revenue $104,705.64 $104,867.88
Total Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Units (ESD) 507.0 507.0 Proposed Fiscal Year Assessment per ESD $206.52 $206.84 Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD
for Zone 3, FY 2021-22 with allowed CPI increase of: 2.00% $234.79 Current Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD
for Zone 3, FY 2022-23 with allowed CPI increase of: 4.20% $244.65 Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget
Zone 3 - Park and Healdsburg Avenue
Healdsburg Landscape and Lighting
Assessment District
2022-H-LLAD.xlsx 20 4/28/2022

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 2022-23
Estimated General Reserve Fund as of July 1 $51,926.14
* Estimated Long Term Capital Reserve Fund as of July 1 $28,045.73 Estimated Annual Revenue $98,267.88
Estimated Long Term Capital Reserve Revenue $6,600.00
Estimated Community Services Fund Contribution for Special Benefits $6,824.40 Estimated Interest Earned $620.00
Total Estimated Funds Available $192,284.15
Estimated Annual Expenditures $105,092.28
Estimated Long Term Capital Expenditures $0.00
Estimated Annual Reserve Balance as of June 30 $52,546.14 Estimated Long Term Capital Reserve Balance as of June 30 $34,645.73 * For FY 2022-23, $27,886.92 of excess Annual Reserve Funds were shifted to the Long Term Capital Reserve Fund.

Zone 3 - Park and Healdsburg Avenue
Summary of Fund Balance
Healdsburg Landscape and Lighting
Assessment District
Fiscal Year 2021-23 Budget
2022-H-LLAD.xlsx 21 4/28/2022

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) Estimated Budget
2021-22 2022-23
Landscaping
City Staff Salaries and Benefits $2,300.00 $2,952.93
Insurance $380.00 $150.98
Contract/Professional Services $800.00 $0.00
Repairs and Maintenance $1,000.00 $3,000.00
Rentals and Leases (Previously Equipment and Supplies) $0.00 $0.00 Long Term Capital Reserve
Contribution towards Future Projects $0.00 $1,750.00
Current Year Projects
Zone 4 Projects $0.00 $0.00
Utility Costs
Utility Services (Includes both Water and Electric) $0.00 $0.00 County Fee $42.00 $42.00
Subtotal $4,522.00 $7,895.91
Assessment Engineering $334.80 $530.20
City Administration (including audit) $887.00 $518.71
Contingency $135.72 $237.42
Total Expenses $5,879.52 $9,182.24
Less Annual Reserve Fund Expenditures $3,000.00 $6,500.00 Less Long Term Capital Reserve Fund Expenditures $0.00 $0.00 Total Costs $2,879.52 $2,682.24
Total Revenue $2,879.52 $2,682.24
Total Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Units (ESD) 24.0 24.0 Proposed Fiscal Year Assessment per ESD $119.98 $111.76 Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD
for Zone 4, FY 2021-22 with allowed CPI increase of: 2.00% $265.08 Current Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD
for Zone 4, FY 2022-23 with allowed CPI increase of: 4.20% $276.21 Healdsburg Landscape and Lighting
Assessment District
Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget
Zone 4 - Senior Housing
2022-H-LLAD.xlsx 22 4/28/2022

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 2022-23
Estimated Annual Reserve Fund as of July 1 $10,171.36
* Estimated Long Term Capital Reserve Fund as of July 1 $706.00 Estimated Annual Revenue $932.24
Estmated Long Term Capital Reserve Revenue $1,750.00

Estimated Interest Earned $42.00
Total Estimated Funds Available $13,601.60
Estimated Annual Expenditures $7,432.24
Estimated Long Term Capital Expenditures $0.00
Estimated Annual Reserve Balance as of June 30 $3,713.36 Estimated Long Term Capital Reserve Balance as of June 30 $2,456.00 * For FY 2022-23, $706.00 of excess Annual Reserve Funds were shifted to the Long Term Capital Reserve Fund.

Summary of Fund Balance
Healdsburg Landscape and Lighting
Assessment District
Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget
Zone 4 - Senior Housing
2022-H-LLAD.xlsx 23 4/28/2022

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) Estimated Budget
2021-22 2022-23
Landscaping
City Staff Salaries and Benefits $2,971.00 $2,952.93
Insurance $2,652.00 $150.98
Contract/Professional Services $6,600.00 $6,200.00
Repairs and Maintenance $500.00 $1,000.00
Rentals and Leases (Previously Equipment and Supplies) $0.00 $0.00 Long Term Capital Reserve
Contribution towards FutureProjects $0.00 $5,400.00
Current Year Projects
Utility Services (Includes both Water and Electric) $6,500.00 $5,500.00 County Fee $150.00 $150.00
Subtotal $19,373.00 $21,353.91
Assessment Engineering $1,332.80 $1,424.84
City Administration (including audit) $2,158.00 $1,259.12 Contingency $1,940.26 $2,135.71
Total Expenses $24,804.06 $26,173.58
Less Annual Reserve Fund Expenditures $0.00 $2,000.00
Less Long Term Capital Reserve Fund Expenditures $0.00 $0.00 Total Costs $24,804.06 $24,173.58
Total Revenue $24,804.06 $24,173.58
Total Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Units (ESD) 37.0 37.0 Proposed Fiscal Year Assessment per ESD $670.38 $653.34 Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD
for Zone 5, FY 2021-22 with allowed CPI increase of: 2.00% $845.02 Current Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD
for Zone 5, FY 2022-23 with allowed CPI increase of: 4.20% $880.51 Healdsburg Landscape and Lighting
Assessment District
Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget
Zone 5 - Sonata (Includes Grant Street Village)
2022-H-LLAD.xlsx 24 4/28/2022

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 2022-23
Estimated Annual Reserve Fund as of July 1 $12,188.67
Estimated Long Term Capital Reserve Fund as of July 1 $14,440.00 Estimated Annual Revenue $18,773.58
Estimated Long Term Capital Reserve Revenue $5,400.00
Estimated Interest Earned $190.00
Total Estimated Funds Available $50,992.25
Estimated Annual Expenditures $20,773.58
Estimated Long Term Capital Expenditures $0.00
Estimated Annual Reserve Balanace as of June 30 $10,378.67 Estimated Long Term Capital Reserve Balance as of June 30 $19,840.00 * For FY 2022-23, $14,440.00 of excess Annual Reserve Funds were shifted to the Long Term Capital Reserve Fund.

Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget
Zone 5 - Sonata (Includes Grant Street Village)
Summary of Fund Balance
Healdsburg Landscape and Lighting
Assessment District
2022-H-LLAD.xlsx 25 4/28/2022

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) Estimated Budget
2021-22 2022-23
Landscaping
City Staff Salaries and Benefits $2,529.00 $2,952.93
Insurance $3,326.00 $150.98
Contract/Professional Services $9,000.00 $9,000.00
Repairs and Maintenance $1,000.00 $3,000.00
Rentals and Leases (Previously Equipment and Supplies) $0.00 $0.00 Long Term Capital Reserve
Contribution towards Future Projects $4,000.00 $4,000.00 Current Year Projects
Zone 6 Projects $0.00 $0.00
Utility Costs
Utility Services (Includes both Water and Electric) $6,327.00 $6,400.00 County Fee $200.00 $200.00
Subtotal $26,382.00 $25,703.91
Assessment Engineering $1,521.70 $1,699.70
City Administration (including audit) $2,200.00 $1,271.23 Contingency $1,319.30 $1,286.66
Total Expenses $31,423.00 $29,961.50
Community Services Fund contribution for Special Benefits $10,553.00 $10,281.50 Less Contribution from Annual Reserve Funds $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Less Contribution from Long Term Capital Reserve Funds $0.00 $0.00 Total Costs $18,870.00 $17,680.00
Total Revenue $18,870.00 $17,680.00
Total Equivalent Single Family Dwelling Units (ESD) 34.00 34.00 Proposed Fiscal Year Assessment per ESD $555.00 $520.00 Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD
For Zone 6, FY 2021-22 with allowed CPI increase of 2.00% $820.78 Current Maximum Annual Assessment per ESD
For Zone 6, FY 2022-23 with allowed CPI increase of: 4.20% $855.25 Healdsburg Landscape and Lighting
Assessment District
Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget
Zone 6 - Sorrento Square
2022-H-LLAD.xlsx 26 4/28/2022

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 2022-23
Estimated Annual Reserve Fund as of July 1 $14,720.00
Estimated Long Term Capital Reserve Fund as of July 1 $49,941.00 Estimated Annual Revenue $13,680.00
Estimated Long Term Capital Reserve Revenue $4,000.00
Estimated Community Services Fund Contribution for Special Benefits $10,281.50 Estimated Interest Earned $250.00
Total Estimated Funds Available $92,872.50
Estimated Annual Expenditures $25,961.50
Estimated Long Term Capital Expenditures $0.00
Estimated Annual Reserve Balance as of June 30 $12,970.00 Estimated Long Term Capital Reserve Balance as of June 30 $53,941.00 * For FY 2022-23, $17,216.00 of excess Annual Reserve Funds were shifted to the Long Term Capital Reserve Fund.

Assessment District
Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget
Zone 6 - Sorrento Square
Summary of Fund Balance
Healdsburg Landscape and Lighting
2022-H-LLAD.xlsx 27 4/28/2022

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 28 PART C
FY 2022-23 ASSESSMENT ROLL
As described in Part B, the total proposed Assessment District FY 2022-23 revenue of $251,171.53 consists of:
$98,856.63 From Zone 1
$2,911.20 From Zone 2
$104,867.88 From Zone 3
$2,682.24 From Zone 4
$24,173.58 From Zone 5
$17,680.00 From Zone 6
The individual assessment per parcel is listed in the Assessment Roll shown in the following pages. The lines and dimensions of each parcel are shown on the maps in the office of the County Assessor of the County of Sonoma.

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District)

HEALDSBURG LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

SUBDIVISION APN USE
CODE
ESD
FACTOR
TOTAL

DWELLING
UNITS
(at Buildout)
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1
ASSESS
ZONE 2
ASSESS
ZONE 3
ASSESS
ZONE 4
ASSES
ZONE 5
ASSES
ZONE 6
ASSES
TOTAL

ASSESS PROPERTY OWNER OWNER ADDRESS
GRANT
STREET
VILLAGE PH 1 002-101-010-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34

JUHNKE CHARLES & GUGLIELMINI
JAMIE 607 LARKSPUR DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
002-101-011-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34 SMITH JENNIFER ET AL 611 LARKSPUR DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 002-101-012-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34 LOCKER GARY L TR & BEVERLY M TR , 002-101-013-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34 COHEN ALAN B 207 CENTER ST HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 002-101-014-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34 LEON LUIS A & LEON GRACIELA ET AL 623 LARKSPUR DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 002-101-015-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34

MENDEZ PEDRO GOMEZ & GOMEZ
MARIA D 627 LARKSPUR DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
002-101-016-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34 BOLAND ALISON ET AL 631 LARKSPUR DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 002-101-017-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34 MUIR RYAN & MUIR MEGAN 635 LARKSPUR DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 002-101-018-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34 SHIRLENE 1791 E 2100 S SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106 002-101-019-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34

WARNER CHARLES D TR & WARNER
PATRICIA H TR 547 W NORTH ST HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
002-101-020-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34 GRAY HAMISH K PO BOX 501 PALMER LAKE, CO 80133 002-101-021-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34

GAVIGLIO MICHAEL TR & KEEFE
MAUREEN R TR 655 LARKSPUR DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
002-101-022-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34

MARTIN DAVID O TR & MARTIN JANE F
TR 659 LARKSPUR DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
002-101-023-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34 WEBB THOMAS W & WEBB JAN J 663 LARKSPUR DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 SONATA
SUBDIVISION 002-101-039-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34

MEYERS DAVID W TR & MEYERS JANE
TR 462 1ST ST PETALUMA, CA 94952
002-101-040-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34

CHRISTOPHER MARY & SILVESTRO
CLAUDIO 671 LARKSPUR DR HELADSBURG, CA 95448
002-101-041-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34

GIOVANNOLI DENNIS TR &
GIOVANNOLI LAURA TR 675 LARKSPUR DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 002-101-042-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34 WEISS ALAN D TR 679 LARKSPUR DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 002-101-043-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34

KELLY DOUGLAS & MOLDVAY CAITLIN
AUGUST 683 LARKSPUR DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
002-101-044-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34 GALINDO GUSTAVO & GALINDO ERIN 820 BANBURY LN MILLBRAE, CA 94030 002-101-045-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34

MILLER CLYDE D TR & MILLER SUSAN
M TR 500 W HARBOR DR #507 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
002-101-046-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34 TR 695 LARKSPUR DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 002-101-047-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34

PEREIRA BRYAN M TR & PEREIRA
MADELINE M TR 699 LARKSPOR DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
002-101-048-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34 STUECHER KRISTEN ELAINE TR ET AL 660 4TH ST #579 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107 002-101-049-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34
PARMETER RANDY & HALLENPARMETER GINA 430 FOSS ST HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 002-101-050-000 0080 0.0 1.0 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 D R HORTON BAY INC 3000 EXECUTIVE PKWY STE 100 SAN RAMON,
CA 94583
002-101-051-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34

SHREINER DAVID R TR & SHREINER
VICTORIA E TR 3775 CROWN HILL SANTA ROSA, CA 95404
002-101-052-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34 FRANK CARLA J TR 75 MARIGOLD WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 002-101-053-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34

BRINKMAN CHRISTIAN W TR &
BRINKMAN DOREEN M TR 65 MARIGOLD WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 002-101-054-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34 IZERRADEN HAFID 3619 LOCKWOOD CT MONTGOMERY, AL 36111 002-101-055-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34

WILLIAMS KELLY DAVID TR & KEEHAN
MARGARET G TR 45 MARIGOLD WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
002-101-056-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34

DANIELS STEVEN TR & DANIELS
MARJATTA TR 34 PASA ROBLES AVE LOS ALTOS, CA 94022
002-101-057-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34 FRANDSEN ERNEST N TR 95425 002-101-058-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34 NG EDWARD TR ET AL 25 AMMERMAN WAY CHESTER, NJ 07930 002-101-059-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34 GRAVES JOHN E TR 5110 MEADVILLE ST EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 002-101-060-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34 EGGERS BILL T & EGGERS ANN ET AL 744 W PLACITA EL CUETO GREEN VALLEY, AZ
85622
002-101-061-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34 DEVOS MAX & DEVOS KATHY 601 THIRD AVE HALF MOON BAY, CA 94019 002-101-062-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $653.34 $653.34

COYNE JAMES M TR & COYNE MARY P
TR 49 SANTA YNEZ CIRCLE NOVATO, CA 94947

SORRENTO
SQUARE 002-480-047-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00

CAMPOS PEDRO PINON & LOPEZ

IVONNE CALLEJAS ET AL
1118 HEALDSBURG AVE HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
002-480-048-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00 RILLA JOHN L & RILLA PAMELA F 1116 HEALDSBURG AVE HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
002-480-049-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00 HWANG SANG WOON 2012 KING PL ROHNERT PARK, CA 94928 002-480-050-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00 QUADRIGA LLC 775 E BLITHEDALE AVE #305 MILL VALLEY, CA
94941
002-480-051-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00

QUEIROLO SILVIO J TR & QUEIROLO
LINDA G TR PO BOX 802 HOPLAND, CA 95449
002-480-052-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00 LACY KATHERINE 1108 HEALDSBURG AVE HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
002-480-053-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00 ATKINSON TERRY L TR PO BOX 9851 RCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067 2022-H-LLAD.xlsx 29

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District)

HEALDSBURG LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

SUBDIVISION APN USE
CODE
ESD
FACTOR
TOTAL

DWELLING
UNITS
(at Buildout)
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1
ASSESS
ZONE 2
ASSESS
ZONE 3
ASSESS
ZONE 4
ASSES
ZONE 5
ASSES
ZONE 6
ASSES
TOTAL

ASSESS PROPERTY OWNER OWNER ADDRESS
002-480-054-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00 KLEEFELD WAYNE & BEVERLY ET AL 1104 HEALDSBURG AVE HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
002-480-055-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00 DEFRIEZ HERB & DEFRIEZ SUZANNE 1254-3 CRAVENS LN CARPENTERIA, CA 93013 002-480-056-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00 WANG LAUREN & KALLINSKY LEWIS 435 CHINA BASIN ST UNIT 444 SAN
FRANCISCO, CA 95448
002-480-057-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00 BASQUE JACOB & HANNAH ET AL 101 FERRERO DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 002-480-058-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00 FERRERO DRIVE LLC 94954 002-480-059-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00

YABERG THOMAS LOWELL TR &
YABERG SUSAN DEAN TR 38 SERAPE PL CAMARILLO, CA 93010
002-480-060-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00

STURMFELS ANDREW J TR &
STURMFELS NICHOLE M TR 107 FERRERO DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 002-480-061-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00 TR PO BOX 311 BURLINGAME, CA 94011 002-480-062-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00

SIMS ROBERT L TR & SIMS VALORI L
TR
2380 ST ASHLEY PL WALNUT CREEK, CA
94598
002-480-063-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00 DONALDSON THOMAS TR & JANET TR 104 LAVENDER CIR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 002-480-064-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00

KOTNIK ANDREW JR TR & KOTNIK
LYDIA LUCY TR 544 PORT CIR CLOVERDALE, CA 95425
002-480-065-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00

MIRAMONTES LOUIS P TR &
MIRAMONTES KRISTI K TR 6621 JOHNSTON RD PLEASANTON, CA 94588 002-480-066-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00 TR PO BOX 311 BURLINGAME, CA 94001 002-480-067-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00 DOHERTY NICHOLAS ET AL 112 LAVENDER CIR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 002-480-068-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00

DEMPSEY NEAL III TR & DEMPSEY

JANET RAE TR
2430 BROADWAY ST SAN FRANCISCO, CA
94115
002-480-069-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00

DRYER WILLIAM JOSEPH TR & DRYER
PATRICIA RYAN TR 116 LAVENDER CIR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
002-480-070-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00

MEZA CHRISTOPHER N & JESSICA G
ET AL 118 LAVENDER CIR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
002-480-071-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00

ROCHIOLI THERESA C TR ET AL &
ROCHIOLI THOMAS M TR 115 LAVENDER CIR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 002-480-072-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00 GREEK CARL V & GREEK SANDRA L 22187 SERANADE RIDGE DR MURRIETA, CA
92562
002-480-073-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00

WELLIVER GREGG C & WELLIVER
ELIZABETH R 119 LAVENDER CIR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
002-480-074-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00 SHAPIRO IRA P 122 MONTE VISTA AVE HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
002-480-075-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00

BEAL GRAHAM WILLIAM JOHN TR &

ANDREWS NANCY TR
120 MONTE VISTA AVE HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
002-480-076-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00

DIRKS GLENN TR & DIRKS PATRICIA
TR
118 MONTE VISTA AVE HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
002-480-077-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00

OLOFFSON RUSSELL GLEN & DE
BENEDETTO PAULA V PO BOX 27468 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255
002-480-078-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00 CHAVEZ JESSICA ET AL 114 MONTE VISTA AVE HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
002-480-079-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00

ATKINSON TERRY L REVOCABLE
TRUST PO BOX 9851 RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067
002-480-080-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $520.00 $520.00

CARTER B AND BARBARA L SMITH
LLC
110 MONTE VISTA AVE HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
002-480-081-000 0080 0.0 1.0 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 ELACORA MIDTOWNE LLC 371 CENTENNIAL PKWY STE 200 LOUISVILLE,
CO 80027
002-480-082-000 0080 0.0 1.0 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 ELACORA MIDTOWNE LLC 371 CENTENNIAL PKWY STE 200 LOUISVILLE,
CO 80027
002-480-083-000 0933 0.0 1.0 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 ELACORA MIDTOWNE LLC 371 CENTENNIAL PKWY STE 200 LOUISVILLE,
CO 80027

HEALDSBURG
ESTATES 003-060-001-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36

LINHARES CYNTHIA J TR &
DECRISTOFORO LORA A TR 1561 PHILIP DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-002-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 RITCHIE DEVORAH R 1559 PHILIP DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-003-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 HARTSOCK LAURAE 1557 PHILIP DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-004-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36

WESSEL DENNIS W & WESSEL

PEGGY M
24051 DRY CREEK RIDGE RD CLOVERDALE,
CA 95425
003-060-005-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 PEREZ ROGELIO & ESTELA 1553 PHILIP DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-006-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 WEBER SALLY A TR PO BOX 1868 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-007-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 ROBERTSON CHERE BETH TR 437 EAST ST HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-008-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36

ANDERSON ROBERT B TR &
ANDERSON CRISTINA M TR 4270 CORONADO AVE SAN DIEGO, CA 92107 003-060-009-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 ROBERTS KATHLEEN COLETTE TR 108 PHILIP DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-010-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 CORNWELL KAREN 112 PHILIP DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-011-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36

OPHEIM ROBERT W TR & OPHEIM
RENE M TR 116 PHILIP DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-060-012-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36

KELLY JEFFREY C TR & WILLOUGHBY
MARY K TR 1212 SUMMIT VIEW DR CONCORD, CA 94521
003-060-013-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 MARGARET 124 PHILIP DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-014-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 BURWELL BLAKE J & HEIDI ANN 1541 ROSEWOOD DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 2022-H-LLAD.xlsx 30

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District)

HEALDSBURG LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

SUBDIVISION APN USE
CODE
ESD
FACTOR
TOTAL

DWELLING
UNITS
(at Buildout)
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1
ASSESS
ZONE 2
ASSESS
ZONE 3
ASSESS
ZONE 4
ASSES
ZONE 5
ASSES
ZONE 6
ASSES
TOTAL

ASSESS PROPERTY OWNER OWNER ADDRESS
003-060-015-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36

DREXLER BRAD TR & DREXLER
PAMELA A TR 509 GREENS DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-060-016-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 HILBORN DAY W & HILBORN JEAN T 132 PHILIP DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-017-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36

BISHOP JACOB J & BISHOP DEBORAH
D 1549 ROSEWOOD DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-060-018-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 RUTKJAER JAN 1553 ROSEWOOD DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-019-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 BLANCHARD JENNA 1557 ROSEWOOD DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-020-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 KLINE JAMES R & PATRICIA K TR 1561 ROSEWOOD DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-021-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36

CARPENTER RUSSELL SCOTT &
KUHNER JAMES LEGIER 136 PAUL WITTKE DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-022-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36

ALLRED WAID C TR & ALLRED TANJA
C TR 132 PAUL WITTKE DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-060-023-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 TAYLOR KATHLEEN 128 PAUL WITTKE DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-024-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 ROSENBLATT PHILIPPA 124 PAUL WITTKE DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-025-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 GRACE-FECKER CATHERINE 120 PAUL WITTKE DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-026-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36

GUERRA JOSEPH S TR & GUERRA
VIRGINIA L TR 2295 S BASCOM AVE CAMPBELL, CA 95008
003-060-027-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36

COCHRAN JONATHAN D TR &
SCHMERSAL PATRICIA A TR 112 PAUL WITTKE DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-028-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 LOPEZ JOHN F 1562 PHILIP DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-029-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 PEARSON ELAINE 1045 WESTSIDE RD HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-030-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36

GROOM DARYL REX TR & GROOM
LISA ANN TR 2111 MILL CREEK RD HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-060-031-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 BOTELLO AGUSTIN & ABELINA 1552 PHILIP DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-032-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 BIERMAN JEFF ET AL 111 PHILIP DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-033-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36

HARRINGTON JOSEPH P &
HARRINGTON JOLINE D PO BOX 345 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-060-034-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36

ANGELL ANN KARAN & ANGELL
BRADFORD WILLIAM 119 PHILIP DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-060-035-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 LUEKER SUSAN 123 PHILIP DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-036-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 LERCHE VIVIAN LEUNG TR 127 PHILIP DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-037-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36

MARAVIGLIA DANIELE L & MCPEAKE
MARGARET C 131 PHILIP DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-060-039-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 MALONE PATRICIA M TR 1566 ROSEWOOD DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-040-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 DURLER ROBERT JR & PATRICIA 1560 ROSEWOOD DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-041-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 MIELOCK CHRISTINE TR PO BOX 270 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-042-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36

TEUSCHLER MARK W TR &
TEUSCHLER SUZANNE M TR 225 LORRAINE CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-043-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 CAROLLE PO BOX 2108 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-044-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 DIEBOLD A JOHN TRUST 237 LORRAINE CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-045-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 TYLER LAURA M 243 LORRAINE CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-046-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36

COUSINEAU MARSHALL R &
COUSINEAU LARA J 696 CASELLA WAY PETALUMA, CA 94954
003-060-047-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36

STONE GERALD L TR & STONE
VICTORIA M TR 255 LORRAINE CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-060-048-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36

LUTZ CRAIG E TR & ALBERTSON
ELISEA A TR 258 LORRAINE CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-060-049-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 SCHROEDER RICHARD W 252 LORRAINE CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-050-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36

SCHULZE GEORGE P TR & SCHULZE
PATRICIA A TR 246 LORRAINE CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-060-051-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 TR 240 LORRAINE CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-052-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36

ECKMAN GARY A TR & ECKMAN MARY
K TR 1609 ROCKVILLE RD FAIRFIELD, CA 94534
003-060-053-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 BARBERA ROBERT H & TERRI L 228 LORRAINE CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-054-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 DORRANCE KELLY L 222 LORRAINE CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-055-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36

MC WILLIAMS MARK TR & MC
WILLIAMS JENNIFER TR 216 LORRAINE CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-056-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36

PUCCIONI MICHAEL A TR & PUCCIONI
JUDY TR PO BOX 510 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-060-057-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 GABAEFF STEVEN C TR 95448 RIVERS

LANDING
(PM 158) 003-060-058-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 COLLIN DAVID W TR & BARBARA M TR 224 LEA ST WINDSOR, CA 95492 003-060-059-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 GARCIA MARCEL WAELCHLI 103 PAUL WITTKE DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-060-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 STROUD SEAN 1703 GUNNING DR WILMINGTON, DE 19803 003-060-061-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $48.52 $206.84 $255.36 ENGELKE JEROLD O JR & LISA M 107 PAUL WITTKE DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-060-062-000 0000 0.0 0.0 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 CITY OF HEALDSBURG 401 GROVE ST HEALDSBURG, CA 95448

RIDGELINE

SUBDIVISION
PHASE 1 003-070-001-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84 KEYES GARY W & KEYES JOAN F 200 CLEAR RIDGE DR HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
2022-H-LLAD.xlsx 31

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District)

HEALDSBURG LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

SUBDIVISION APN USE
CODE
ESD
FACTOR
TOTAL

DWELLING
UNITS
(at Buildout)
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1
ASSESS
ZONE 2
ASSESS
ZONE 3
ASSESS
ZONE 4
ASSES
ZONE 5
ASSES
ZONE 6
ASSES
TOTAL

ASSESS PROPERTY OWNER OWNER ADDRESS
003-070-002-000 0006 0.5 1.0 0.5 $103.42 $103.42

CAMPBELL GEORGE J III TR & MARY
JANE TR 1584 ROSEWOOD DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-070-003-000 0051 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84

REGAN TIMOTHY J TR & REGAN

MICHELLE M TR
1591 CLEAR RIDGE DR HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-070-004-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84

FROST ROBERT M TR & FROST

GLENDA E TR
1587 CLEAR RIDGE DR HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-070-005-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84

HAZLETT JOHN ROBERT TR &

HAZLETT CAROL TR
270 CLEAR RIDGE DR HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-070-006-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84 LAMBERT JOHN E & SCOTT LAUREN M 95448 003-070-007-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84

ADAMS DAYTON W JR TR & ADAMS

SHELLEY A TR
6089 N PARADISE VIEW DR PARADISE VALLEY,
AZ 85253
003-070-008-000 0006 0.5 1.0 0.5 $103.42 $103.42 MANDRIER BRANDT 95448 003-070-009-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84

BIGGERS LINDA KAY TR & BIGGERS

JOHN ALVIN TR
230 CLEAR RIDGE DR HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-070-010-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84

WHITE FREDERIC E TR & WHITE
JANET A TR 70 BLACK LOG RD KENTFIELD, CA 94904
003-070-011-000 0051 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84 BANDA INVESTMENTS INC 25 WEATHERLY DR MILL VALLEY, CA 94941 003-070-012-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84 KOCH APRIL & KOCH ROBERT 95448 003-070-013-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84

MOORE FRANK S TR & MOORE

PATRICIA A TR
757 ROCKDALE DR SAN FRANCISCO, CA
94127
003-070-014-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84 DENNEN MARK & DENNEN JOAN 95448 003-070-015-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84 GABAEFF STEVEN C TR 95448 003-070-016-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84

PHILLIPS JERRY DON TR & PHILLIPS

CARLA CROSS TR
275 CLEAR RIDGE DR HEALDSBURG, CA
95448

RIDGELINE

SUBDIVISION
PHASE 2 003-070-020-000 0006 0.5 1.0 0.5 $103.42 $103.42 RIDGELINE DEVELOPMENT LLC PO BOX 1409 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-070-021-000 0006 0.5 1.0 0.5 $103.42 $103.42 RIDGELINE DEVELOPMENT LLC PO BOX 1409 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448

ROSEWOOD

HEIGHTS
SUBDIVISION 003-080-012-000 0051 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84 WANG CYNTHIA 1635 ROSEWOOD DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-080-013-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84 HUGHES DONALD 360 RIVIERA DR SAN RAFAEL, CA 94901 003-080-014-000 0050 0.5 1.0 0.5 $103.42 $103.42 DAVEY BRIAN TR & DAVEY SHELLY TR 10250 W BURNTWOOD CT BOISE, ID 83704 003-080-015-000 0051 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84 DESAI NITIN R TR & DESAI PRITI N TR 178 DRY CREEK RD HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-080-016-000 0001 0.5 1.0 0.5 $103.42 $103.42 SAYLOR BRADLEY S 3483 SPRINGHILL CT LAFAYETTE, CA 94549 003-080-017-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84

JENKINS DANNELLE DELORES &
JENKINS MATTHEW CHRISTO 1615 ROSEWOOD DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-080-018-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84

RIPES DAVID A TR & RIPES WENDY S
TR 1610 ROSEWOOD DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-080-019-000 0023 1.0 2.0 2.0 $413.68 $413.68 KARAM MITCHELL JAMES TR 1600 ROSEWOOD DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 QUARRY
RIDGE
SUBDIVSION 003-090-001-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

SUAZO BONIFACIO JR & CECILIA
LAGUNAS DE 141 QUARRY RDG HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-090-002-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

GUTIERREZ-ORTEGA JOSE &
GUTIERREZ MARIA MERCEDES 143 QUARRY RDG HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-090-003-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 WYNNE MELANIE LISABETH 147 QUARRY RIDGE CT HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-090-004-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 AVILA-AVILA SALVADOR ET AL 149 QUARRY RDG HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-090-005-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 CARRILLO REYMUNDO & ELVA 153 QUARRY RDG HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-090-006-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

AGUADO JOSE REFUGIO & AUSENCIA
VEGA DE ET AL 155 QUARRY RDG HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-090-007-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

GIRON SUSANA MONTESINOS DE &
CUPERTINO MARIO 159 QUARRY RDG HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-090-008-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

RODRIGUEZ SALVADOR LEDEZMA &
RUIZ MARIA PO BOX 2162 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-090-009-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

MACKINTOSH KENNETH M &
BOUTEBA HAMID 165 QUARRY RDG CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-090-010-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 TORRES-AGUILAR JAVIER ET AL 169 QUARRY RDG HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-090-011-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

CASTILLO JESUS RAMOS & CARMEN
RIVAS DE PO BOX 782 GEYSERVILLE, CA 95441
003-090-012-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

PANTOJA JESUS MURILLO & VICTORIA
LEON DE 173 QUARRY RDG HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-090-013-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 VELAZQUEZ JUAN & ABELINA 177 QUARRY RDG HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-090-014-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

LOPEZ RAMIRO LEON & LEON GLORIA
RAMIREZ 179 QUARRY RDG HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-090-015-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

PANTOJA JESUS L & ESPERANZA

LEON DE
97 KENNEDY LN SPC 47 HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-090-016-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 MITCHELL JEFFREY 185 QUARRY RIDGE CT HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-090-017-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

SANCHEZ SERGIO MAYA & DE MAYA
CAROLINA AGUAYA 189 QUARRY RDG HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
2022-H-LLAD.xlsx 32

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District)

HEALDSBURG LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

SUBDIVISION APN USE
CODE
ESD
FACTOR
TOTAL

DWELLING
UNITS
(at Buildout)
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1
ASSESS
ZONE 2
ASSESS
ZONE 3
ASSESS
ZONE 4
ASSES
ZONE 5
ASSES
ZONE 6
ASSES
TOTAL

ASSESS PROPERTY OWNER OWNER ADDRESS
003-090-018-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 FOX KAREN YUEN TR 1220 TASMAN DR #2 SUNNYVALE, CA 94089 003-090-019-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 ARREOLA VICTOR & MARIA PO BOX 702 GEYSERVILLE, CA 95441 003-090-020-000 0018 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 KOPETSKY MICHAEL J 1083 VINE ST #216 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-090-021-000 0046 1.0 51.0 51.0 $13,320.18 $10,548.84 $23,869.02 MONTE VINA L P 790 SONOMA BLVD SANTA ROSA, CA 95401

PARKLAND
FARMS

SUBDIVISON
PHASE 1 003-100-001-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 HOLMEFJORD LISBETH 120 PARKWOODS CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-100-002-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

BYRNE KATHLEEN JOHNSON & MISKO
TIMOTHY ALAN 114 PARKWOODS CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-100-003-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

SARQUIS ROBERT H & SARQUIS
SHARYN L 110 PARKWOODS CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-100-004-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

NORMAN RICHARD M TR & NORMAN
BARBARA J TR 106 PARKWOODS CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-100-005-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

BRENTON JAMES F TR & BRENTON
CYNTHIA L TR 102 PARKWOODS CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-100-006-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

WHITEMORE THOMAS BORDEN TR &
WHITEMORE CONNI LYNN 101 PARKWOODS CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-100-007-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 BUTLER MARIE J TR 107 PARKWOODS CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-100-008-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 MICH BONNIE A TR 113 PARKWOODS CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-100-009-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

RAMAZZOTTI ADRIAN B &
RAMAZZOTTI SHELLIE A 115 PARKWOODS CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-100-010-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

LUSHER JESSICA MARIE & LUSHER

CORY MICHAEL
104 VILLAGE OAKS CT HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-100-011-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

POWELL STEVE M TR & POWELL

LYNN M MC CAFFREY TR
110 VILLAGE OAKS CT HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-100-012-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

MCKINNEY NANCY LUBICH &
MCKINNEY GREGORY WILLIAM 371 HEARST AVE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94112 003-100-013-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

FILBEN JOHN M TR & MAZZONI LISA M
TR
122 VILLAGE OAKS CT HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-100-014-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 BOYD JOSEPH E & JOANNE F TR PO BOX 6861 SANTA ROSA, CA 95406 003-100-015-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

STAUFFER RALPH E TR & KATHLEEN
Y TR
143 VILLAGE OAKS CT HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-100-016-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

CONTRERAS ROBERT & CONTRERAS
JODI
137 VILLAGE OAKS CT HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-100-017-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

GARRETT PAUL D TR & CABRAL

THERESA L TR
131 VILLAGE OAKS CT HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-100-018-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 OGDEN GERALD R & ALISON L TR 125 VILLAGE OAKS CT HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-100-019-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 PONITKOFF VADIM V & TATIANA P TR 119 VILLAGE OAKS CT HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-100-020-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 DELFINO DIANNE MARIE TR 113 VILLAGE OAKS CT HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-100-021-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

MUELLER MARVIN J TR & MUELLER

WANDA TR
107 VILLAGE OAKS CT HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-100-022-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 FEUERSTEIN CAROL TR 213 CHIQUITA RD HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-100-023-000 0080 0.0 0.0 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 CITY OF HEALDSBURG 401 GROVE ST HEALDSBURG, CA 95448

PARKLAND
FARMS

SUBDIVISON
PHASE 7 & 8 003-110-001-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

BOREL SYLVAIN A TR & LORRAINE D
TR 175 APPALOOSA TRL HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-110-002-000 0001 0.5 1.0 0.5 $130.59 $103.42 $234.01

MCGARRAUGH GEOFFREY VINCENT
TR & MCGARRAUGH HOLLY 107 G ST # 209 SAN RAFAEL, CA 94901 003-110-003-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

NARDI THOMAS J TR & NARDI
SOUNDRA S TR 140 WILD HORSE CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-110-004-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 GOULD ROBERT G & GRADY GIGI M 130 WILD HORSE CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-110-005-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

CHIMINELLO PHILIP D & CHIMINELLO
CATHERINE K 120 WILD HORSE CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-110-006-000 0001 0.0 1.0 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 CITY OF HEALDSBURG 401 GROVE ST HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-110-007-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

FRASER ROBERT P & FRASER
CHRISTINE E 115 WILD HORSE CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-110-008-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 STALEY PHILIP K TR & PAMELA A TR 17594 HEALDSBURG AVE HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-110-009-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 LOUPY THOMAS R & LUCY A 135 WILD HORSE CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-110-010-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 KUPERS JEFFREY B & KOHLER KAY E PO BOX 666 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-110-011-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 WILSON CATHY J TR 235 APPALOOSA TRL HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-110-012-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 FRANKLIN SUZANNE 265 APPALOOSA TRL HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-110-013-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 DUFFY MICHAEL J & DUFFY NICOL L 275 APPALOOSA TRL HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-110-014-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

CAMPBELL CHRISTINE BELLA TR &
CAMPBELL WILLIAM DOU 1723 CANYON RUN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 2022-H-LLAD.xlsx 33

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District)

HEALDSBURG LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

SUBDIVISION APN USE
CODE
ESD
FACTOR
TOTAL

DWELLING
UNITS
(at Buildout)
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1
ASSESS
ZONE 2
ASSESS
ZONE 3
ASSESS
ZONE 4
ASSES
ZONE 5
ASSES
ZONE 6
ASSES
TOTAL

ASSESS PROPERTY OWNER OWNER ADDRESS
003-110-015-000 0022 1.0 2.0 2.0 $522.36 $413.68 $936.04 VOGENSEN SHARON K TR ET AL 8825 W DRY CREEK RD HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-110-016-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

STALLARD BARRY W TR & STALLARD
KAYE B TR 280 APPALOOSA TRL HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-110-017-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 STEWART DONNA M TR 290 APPALOOSA TRL HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-110-018-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

FRECHETTE PAUL W TR &
FRECHETTE CHERYL A TR 270 APPALOOSA TRL HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-110-019-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 DEUTSCH L PETER TR PO BOX 1998 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-110-022-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

SMITH SHARON K & WARE HILARY E
TR
1879 FUNSTON AVE SAN FRANCISCO, CA
94116
003-110-023-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

HOPKINS DONALD GREGORY TR &

HOPKINS CATHY TR
210 MORGAN RIDGE CT HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-110-024-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

BEVERIDGE CRAWFORD W TR &

DEVOE MARGUERITE TR
220 MORGAN RIDGE CT HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-110-025-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 WESTFALL JAMES S TR 230 MORGAN RIDGE CT HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-110-026-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

BEACH GARY L TR & BEACH TANYA
ENDERS
250 MORGAN RIDGE CT HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-110-027-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

FLORES HENRY CUEVAS TR &

FLORES COLLEEN TR
240 MORGAN RIDGE CT HEALDSBURG, CA
95448

PARKLAND
FARMS

SUBDIVISON
PHASE 9 003-120-001-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 ODATO DAVID TR 190 SPUR RIDGE CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-120-004-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

LIPPS ROBERT T TR & LIPPS SUSAN F
TR 160 SPUR RIDGE CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-120-005-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

DEMAREST JOHN H TR & DEMAREST
LISA E TR 150 SPUR RIDGE CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-120-006-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 WILKIE ROBERT J & WILKIE LINDA C 155 SPUR RIDGE CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-120-007-000 0051 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

MALPASS HERBERT H III TR &
MALPASS JOIE L TR 165 SPUR RIDGE CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-120-008-000 0000 0.5 1.0 0.5 $130.59 $103.42 $234.01 JORDAN LOUIS & JORDAN LYNDA LL 1083 VINE ST # 291 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-120-009-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 JORDAN LOUIS G PMB 291 /1083 VINE ST HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-120-010-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

BORGES JANE TR & BORGES
TIMOTHY TR 195 SPUR RIDGE CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-120-011-000 0930 0.0 0.0 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 CITY OF HEALDSBURG 401 GROVE ST HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-120-012-000 0000 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 OLSEN ERIK B TR & DEBORAH H TR 170 SPUR RIDGE CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-120-013-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 SCHOCK CHRISTIAN TR 180 SPUR RIDGE CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448

PARKLAND
FARMS

SUBDIVISON
PHASE 2 003-130-001-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 ROUSCHE PATRICK 1713 CANYON RUN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-130-002-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

AZEVEDO GRANT I TR & AZEVEDO
KELLYANN TR 1715 CANYON RUN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-130-003-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 LOPEZ ROBERT J PO BOX 361 GEYSERVILLE, CA 95441 003-130-004-000 0023 1.0 2.0 2.0 $522.36 $413.68 $936.04 WEBER SALLY A PO BOX 1868 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-130-005-000 0023 1.0 2.0 2.0 $522.36 $413.68 $936.04 WEBER SALLY A PO BOX 1868 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-130-006-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 MURPHY KATHLEEN PATRICIA 1729 CANYON RUN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-130-007-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 UCHIDA CALIN 1731 CANYON RUN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-130-008-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 FOSTER CRAIG B & FOSTER ANN 1733 CANYON RUN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-130-009-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 SMITH TOMI & CULLINEN ROBERT 1735 CANYON RUN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-130-010-000 0023 1.0 2.0 2.0 $522.36 $413.68 $936.04 GONZALEZ JORGE & MARY 4368 HERITAGE LN ROHNERT PARK, CA 94928 003-130-011-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

CAVIGLIA MATT TR & CAVIGLIA
CHERYL TR 217 SPUR RIDGE LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-130-012-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 GLADDEN MARK L TR PO BOX 455 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-130-013-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 LOW MAY TR 418 POPPY HILL DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-130-014-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

HEYFRON MICHAEL B & HEYFRON
JESSICA C 1732 CANYON RUN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-130-015-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 KRAEGER BRENDA B 158 ESPANA WAY WINDSOR, CA 95492 003-130-016-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 RODRIGUEZ-CEPEDA ENRIQUE TR 1728 CANYON RUN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-130-017-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

SMART DANIELLE M & SMART WILLIAM
V 1726 CANYON RUN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-130-018-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 KESTER MELISSA 1724 CANYON RUN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-130-019-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 CATENACCI MADALINE M TR 2187 WARWICK DR SANTA ROSA, CA 95405 003-130-020-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

BARRAGAN MARISELA & CALDERON
SAMUEL 1720 CANYON RUN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-130-021-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

GIORGI RICHARD A TR & GIORGI
DOROTHY L TR 1718 CANYON RUN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-130-022-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

MILLER JUSTIN B TR & MILLER KARIN
S WERNELIUS TR PO BOX 63 GEYSERVILLE, CA 95441
2022-H-LLAD.xlsx 34

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District)

HEALDSBURG LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

SUBDIVISION APN USE
CODE
ESD
FACTOR
TOTAL

DWELLING
UNITS
(at Buildout)
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1
ASSESS
ZONE 2
ASSESS
ZONE 3
ASSESS
ZONE 4
ASSES
ZONE 5
ASSES
ZONE 6
ASSES
TOTAL

ASSESS PROPERTY OWNER OWNER ADDRESS
003-130-023-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 KERN ROBERT M TR ET AL 1220 DAVIDA CT WINDSOR, CA 95492 003-130-024-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 WHITE ASHLEY A 1712 CANYON RUN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-130-025-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

DINKEL DAVID A & DINKEL
ALEJANDRINA 1713 SPUR RIDGE LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-130-026-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 DUGAN LINDA L 1715 SPUR RIDGE LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-130-027-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 ROBINSON E CHARLOTTE TR 1717 SPUR RIDGE LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-130-028-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

ASHFORD STEVEN & ASHFORD
JESSICA 931 ROSETTE CT SUNNYVALE, CA 94086
003-130-029-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 KENNEDY LISAMARIE TR 1721 SPUR RIDGE LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-130-030-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

HARTMANN DAN P TR & WELLER

OLGA JULIA TR
1723 SPUR RIDGE LANE HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-130-031-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 CANELIS STEVE 95448 003-130-032-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 PENA MIGUEL A & PENA MARISELA 1727 SPUR RIDGE LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-130-033-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 STEINBACH SAN SAN 9223 VINECREST RD WINDSOR, CA 95492 003-130-034-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 CARY LAWRENCE E TR ET AL 1731 SPUR RIDGE LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95445 003-130-035-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 DELQUERRA MATTHEW J 1733 SPUR RIDGE LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-130-036-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

SMITH DORI A TR & NEGRINO THOMAS
J TR 1083 VINE ST #228 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-130-038-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 MARQUIS SAMANTHA & MARQUIS IAN 1732 SPUR RIDGE LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-130-039-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

MEYER CHRISTOPHER & MEYER
GRETCHEN 1730 SPUR RIDGE LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-130-040-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 JENNIFER 1728 SPUR RIDGE LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-130-041-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

ANDERSON BRIDGET G & ANDERSON
TIMOTHY K 1726 SPUR RIDGE LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-130-042-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 HEATH GEORGE R & PAM J 1724 SPUR RIDGE LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-130-043-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 BRIAN AND CATHY WILSON LLC 235 APPALOOSA TRL HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-130-044-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 GLADDEN MARK L TR 95448 003-130-045-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

CHAPMAN GALAND B JR & CHAPMAN
JOANNE G 1718 SPUR RIDGE LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-130-046-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

MELTZER JOSHUA & STOCKDALE
SHANNON 2440 HILLSIDE AVE BERKELEY, CA 94704
003-130-047-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 KUFUDAKES DANIEL A & RONDA LYN 1734 SPUR RIDGE LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-140-001-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 CARABALLO OSCAR 1710 CANYON RUN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-140-002-000 0023 1.0 2.0 2.0 $522.36 $413.68 $936.04 TAPPIN NATALEE PO BOX 1995 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-140-003-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 SINDLE RACHELLE L 1706 CANYON RUN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-140-004-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

GOOD SHEPHERD LUTHERAN
CHURCH OF HEALDSBURG 1402 UNIVERSITY ST HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-140-005-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 WU CARYN & SARHANGI AMIR 12 MIDDEN LANE TIBURON, CA 94920 003-140-006-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 NELSON ERNEST & NELSON JANET 47 N SWANWICK PL TOMBALL, TX 77375 003-140-007-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 MAURO-MANOS AMY J TR 1701 SPUR RIDGE LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-140-008-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 HART TALLIA 1703 SPUR RIDGE LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-140-009-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

WILSON DOUGLAS C TR & WILSON
MARIA GRACE TR 626 BROWN ST HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-140-010-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 OSEGUERA MARIO ARMANDO 1707 SPUR RIDGE LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-140-011-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

BLANCHARD MATTHEW TR &
BLANCHARD KELLY TR 962 PINOT NOIR WAY WINDSOR, CA 95492 003-140-012-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 HOUSE PROPERTIES 77 II LP 35 CORTE MADERA AVE MILL VALLEY, CA
94941
003-140-013-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 CHUNG EDWARD S 1710 SPUR RIDGE LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-140-014-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 FAIRCHILD SALLIE P TR 2077 CENTRO EAST ST TIBURON, CA 94920 003-140-015-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 MACIAS TRINIDAD & LOURDES 1706 SPUR RIDGE LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-140-016-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 MANA MITCHELL 1704 SPUR RIDGE LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-140-017-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

ALCALA JOSE J & ALCALA MARGARITA
M 1702 SPUR RIDGE LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-140-018-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

FLORES FRANCISCO ROMERO &
ARACELY ROMO 1700 SPUR RIDGE LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-140-019-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

ANDERSON BILLIE L TR & ANDERSON
PAUL A TR 511 TURNEY ST SAUSALITO, CA 94965
003-140-020-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 GIDDINGS MALIN TR 1170 SACRAMENTO ST #15A SAN FRANCISCO,
CA 94108
003-140-021-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 RICHARDS REBECCA & RICHARD Q IV 1686 ARBOR WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-140-022-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 IUS TINA ET AL 1687 ARBOR WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-140-023-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 TR 4825 KIMBERLY WAY DOYLESTOWN, PA 18902 003-140-024-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 SCHRADER WILLIAM R TR ET AL 403 POPPY HILL DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-140-025-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

DEGONZALEZ OLIVIA & GONZALEZ
DIANA 1690 CANYON RUN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-140-026-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 FONG CAMILLE & BEALS HAROLD L III 208 CONCORD DR MENLO PARK, CA 94025 003-140-027-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

GANCIA CAROL S & ONGSIAKO

JASMIN GAN
555 FULTON ST UNIT 334 SAN FRANCISCO, CA
94102
2022-H-LLAD.xlsx 35

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District)

HEALDSBURG LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

SUBDIVISION APN USE
CODE
ESD
FACTOR
TOTAL

DWELLING
UNITS
(at Buildout)
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1
ASSESS
ZONE 2
ASSESS
ZONE 3
ASSESS
ZONE 4
ASSES
ZONE 5
ASSES
ZONE 6
ASSES
TOTAL

ASSESS PROPERTY OWNER OWNER ADDRESS
003-140-028-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 LYETH RYAN L & GAITAN ALICIA P 1684 CANYON RUN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-140-029-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 GRANDE STEVEN L & DANA J 1682 CANYON RUN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-140-030-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 PRICER LOWELL KENT 1680 CANYON RUN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-140-031-000 0023 1.0 2.0 2.0 $522.36 $413.68 $936.04

MIKSIS BARBARA L TR & MIKSIS GARY
F TR PO BOX 591-I HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-140-032-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 LEGRAND RACHEL 1676 CANYON RUN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-140-033-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

GONZALEZ MIGUEL GONZALEZ &
ESMERALDA MONDRAGON DE 1674 CANYON RUN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-140-034-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

LAROSSA SUSAN G & BICKFORD
PATRICK G 1672 CANYON RUN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-140-035-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 RUIZ JOSE L ET AL 1670 CANYON RUN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-140-036-000 0930 0.0 0.0 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 CITY OF HEALDSBURG 401 GROVE ST HEALDSBURG, CA 95448

PARKLAND
FARMS

SUBDIVISION
PHASE 3 003-150-001-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

ANDERSON AMY ELIZABETH TR &

ANDERSON BRYAN MICHAEL
314 EQUESTRIAN GAP HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-150-002-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 THOMPSON KIM R TR 10 OAK KNOLL DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-150-003-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 NOBLES VICTORIA A TR 95448 003-150-004-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 STEWART ELLEN H & DARREL J 95448 003-150-005-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 KOHLI SUMIT & KOHLI PARUL T 95448 003-150-006-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 GLADDEN MARK L TR 95448 003-150-007-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 ZERMENO MARTHA IVONNE 95448 003-150-008-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

GONZALEZ DAVID E TR & GONZALEZ

VICTORIA E TR
317 EQUESTRIAN GAP HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-150-009-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 WELT ELLEN S 458 HEATHCLIFF PL SAN JOSE, CA 95111 003-150-010-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

BIZIEFF GORDON M TR & BIZIEFF
VICTORIA L TR 21 BROADVIEW TER ORINDA, CA 94563
003-150-011-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 ZHANG ZHAN TR & YANG LINDA TR 3127 VIA SERENA UNIT P LAGUNA WOODS,
CA 92637
003-150-012-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 HIRSCHMANN SANDRA J TR ET AL 1275 BLACK MOUNTAIN RD HILLSBOROUGH,
CA 94010
003-150-013-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 MARTIN LUCINDA TR 617 SANNS LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-150-014-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 KIMBERLY 316 BRIDLE PATH HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-150-015-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

AULD RICHARD M JR TR & AULD
MARION M TR 320 BRIDLE PATH HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-150-016-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

VIRAMONTES ANTONIO CORTES &
MARIA REYNA 324 BRIDLE PATH HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-150-017-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

PERRILL NOVA S & PERRILL CHRISTIN
J 328 BRIDLE PATH HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-150-018-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

GLADDEN MARK L TR & GLADDEN
KATHLEEN M TR 1648 ROSEWOOD DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-150-019-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

HALVORSEN RICHARD J TR &
HALVORSEN ELENA M TR 1713 SADDLE DRAW HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-150-020-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 VILLANO MATTHEW JACOB 1711 SADDLE DRAW HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-150-021-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 CHAVEZ CARLOS E & MAYBERRYCHAVEZ LINDA 1709 SADDLE DRAW HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-150-022-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 DELOS ANDREW 1707 SADDLE DRAW HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-150-023-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

HENDRICKSON MERLIN ALEXANDER II
ET AL 1705 SADDLE DRAW HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-150-024-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 GRASSI RONALD M & SALLY A 1703 SADDLE DRAW HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-150-025-000 0023 1.0 2.0 2.0 $522.36 $413.68 $936.04 SEGHESIO DONNA J 542 SUNNYVALE DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-150-026-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 STARNES DE WAYNE ET AL 351 PARKLAND FARMS BLVD HEALDSBURG,
CA 95448
003-150-027-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 LABREE BETH 1702 SADDLE DRAW HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-150-028-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

CEJA SANDRA RODRIGUEZ & CEJA
ALFONSO 1704 SADDLE DRAW HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-150-029-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 CONLAN TYE MITCHELL TR PO BOX 1696 CASTROVILLE, CA 95012 003-150-030-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

RYAN RICHARD D TR & RYAN CAROL
A TR 501 GREENS DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-150-031-000 0023 1.0 2.0 2.0 $522.36 $413.68 $936.04 ROVCO INDUSTRIES TRUST ET AL PO BOX 2273 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA
94083
003-150-032-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

HAGELE DAVID TR & HAGELE LAURIE
TR 1712 SADDLE DRAW HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-150-033-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 PRENDIVILLE STEPHEN 1720 SADDLE DRAW HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-150-034-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 CHAVEZ WILLIAM PO BOX 718 WINDSOR, CA 95492

PARKLAND
FARMS

SUBDIVISION
PHASE 4 003-150-035-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

PERIN DIANE L TR & HOCK ROGER R
TR 1701 LATIGO LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-150-036-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 BELL CHARLES E 1703 LATIGO LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 2022-H-LLAD.xlsx 36

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District)

HEALDSBURG LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

SUBDIVISION APN USE
CODE
ESD
FACTOR
TOTAL

DWELLING
UNITS
(at Buildout)
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1
ASSESS
ZONE 2
ASSESS
ZONE 3
ASSESS
ZONE 4
ASSES
ZONE 5
ASSES
ZONE 6
ASSES
TOTAL

ASSESS PROPERTY OWNER OWNER ADDRESS
003-150-037-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 MICHAEL 1705 LATIGO LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-150-038-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

BRUINGTON VERA & BRUINGTON
EUGENE 917 BIRKDALE CT WINDSOR, CA 95492
003-150-039-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

ERTEL FRANCIS D TR & ERTEL KAREN
R TR 1709 LATIGO LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-150-040-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

TREMONT MICHAEL TR & TREMONT
JENNIFER M TR PO BOX 1162 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-150-041-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 MYER CATARINA T TR 5427 VOLKERTS RD SEBASTOPOL, CA 95472 003-150-042-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

REED DAVID W TR & CHATTAN
ONDINE M TR 1715 LATIGO LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-150-043-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 WIDICK SHAWN M & DENISE M 355 BRIDLE PATH HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-150-044-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 HATHAWAY CAROL ANN TR 357 BRIDLE PATH HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-150-045-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 DENMON BOBBIE H TR 361 BRIDLE PATH HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-150-046-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

SCHUELER TODD R & SCHUELER
ROSAELIA MEZA ET AL 125 COUNCIL GAP CT CARY, NC 27513
003-150-047-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

GATTUSO PHILLIP J TR & GATTUSO
GINA L TR 365 BRIDLE PATH HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-150-048-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 DEVITT THOMAS P & VERONICA C TR 1714 LATIGO LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-150-049-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

EICHINGER GREGORY H & LARSON
ATHINA C 1721 DELAWARE ST BERKELEY, CA 94703
003-150-050-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 GORDY TIMOTHY M & GUNES OLMEZ 1710 LATIGO LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-150-051-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 GOODWIN VALERIE 1708 LATIGO LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-150-052-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 ZIEGLER BARON V 1706 LATIGO LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-150-053-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 DELFINO MICHELE JANINE TR 1704 LATIGO LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-150-054-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

GIACOMELLI JESSE & GIACOMELLI
JENNA 1702 LATIGO LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-150-055-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 REED DAVID S 1700 LATIGO LN HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-150-056-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

FLETCHER ABBY L & FLETCHER
JAMES D PO BOX 1471 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-150-057-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

RAMIREZ JAVIER & HERNANDEZ

ISABELLE M
367 PARKLAND FARMS BLVD HEALDSBURG,
CA 95448
003-150-058-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

NOESEKABEL TOBIAS & NOESEKABEL

ALLISON ELIZABETH
369 PARKLAND FARMS BLVD HEALDSBURG,
CA 95448
003-150-059-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 FALBERG JAMES C & HANNAH 371 PARKLAND FARMS BLVD HEALDSBURG,
CA 95448
003-150-060-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 ANDALIS ALEX & ANDALIS JAMIE 373 PARKLAND FARMS BLVD HEALDSBURG,
CA 95448
003-150-061-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

VANNOY JAMES MARTIN TR &
VANNOY ANN LOUISE TR 539 TUCKER ST HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-150-062-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 GARVIN KEVIN J & SANDRA S 377 PARKLAND FARMS BLVD HEALDSBURG,
CA 95448

PARKLAND
FARMS

SUBDIVISION
PHASE 10A 003-150-063-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

HODGES RONALD E TR & HODGES
SHARON J TR 367 BRIDLE PATH HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-150-064-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

VIDAURRI DAVID M TR & MARQUEZ
MARGARET L TR 371 BRIDLE PATH HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-150-065-000 0051 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

GONZALEZ GABRIEL & YU CAROLINE
WEI-TYNG 377 BRIDLE PATH HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-150-066-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 SLAIKEU PAUL ET AL 384 BRIDLE PATH HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-150-067-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 LUDWIG MARY E 378 BRIDLE PATH HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-150-068-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

DIVITA DANIEL P TR & DIVITA CORLISS
R TR 372 BRIDLE PATH HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-150-069-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

ROBINETT DAVID FRANCIS TR &
GREENAWALT LILA BENTE 366 BRIDLE PATH HEALDSBURG, CA 95448

PARKLAND
FARMS

SUBDIVISION
PHASE 5 003-160-001-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 FREEMAN MONTY & FAVERO ANTOINE 379 PARKLAND FARMS BLVD HEALDSBURG,
CA 95448
003-160-002-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 CLARFIELD JULIE A TR 381 PARKLAND FARMS BLVD HEALDSBURG,
CA 95448
003-160-003-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

PRUNTY JOHN LYNN TR & PRUNTY

NANCY E TR
383 PARKLAND FARMS BLVD HEALDSBURG,
CA 95448
003-160-004-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

PRENDIVILLE MARK TR &

PRENDIVILLE SHANNON K TR
385 PARKLAND FARMS BLVD HEALDSBURG,
CA 95448
003-160-005-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

FOLEY BEINING CHRISTIAN OLAF TR &

FOLEY BEINING KA
387 PARKLAND FARMS BLVD HEALDSBURG,
CA 95448
003-160-006-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

ANDREWS JOHN P TR & ANDREWS

MONA L TR
389 PARKLAND FARMS BLVD HEALDSBURG,
CA 95448
003-160-007-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 WILLIAMS MARY PATRICIA TR 391 PARKLAND FARMS BLVD HEALDSBURG,
CA 95448
2022-H-LLAD.xlsx 37

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District)

HEALDSBURG LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

SUBDIVISION APN USE
CODE
ESD
FACTOR
TOTAL

DWELLING
UNITS
(at Buildout)
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1
ASSESS
ZONE 2
ASSESS
ZONE 3
ASSESS
ZONE 4
ASSES
ZONE 5
ASSES
ZONE 6
ASSES
TOTAL

ASSESS PROPERTY OWNER OWNER ADDRESS
003-160-008-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

ZHARI ABDEL AZIZ TR & ZHARI

MONICA E TR
401 PARKLAND FARMS BLVD HEALDSBURG,
CA 95448
003-160-009-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 KYNTL JOSEF TR & KYNTL JANA TR 3559 STALLION DR SANTA ROSA, CA 95404 003-160-010-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

FERRELL BRIAN MICHAEL & FERRELL
MARISA MICHELE 397 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-160-011-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 REEDY KATHRYN & REEDY ROSS 395 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-160-012-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 TYLER ELLEN RAE 393 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-160-013-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

WILDERMUTH DANIEL S TR &
MAXWELL BEATRICE S TR 391 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-160-014-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 SIGLER LEILA TR 371 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-160-015-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

BERNARD STEVE P & BERNARD
KIMBERLY ANN 369 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-160-016-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 ELIZABETH 367 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-160-017-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

LANGE MICHAEL BROOKS & LANGE
CONSTANCE 365 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-160-018-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 RINALDI CHRISTOPHER & LORI 363 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-160-019-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 HIXSON JUSTIN & HIXSON KRYSTLE 361 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-160-020-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 SEUFERER MARTIN L & KRIS E 359 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-160-021-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 ALARY WANDA L TR 357 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-160-022-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

TISCARENO ADAM & TISCARENO MIA
PAULINE 3217 JUSTINPAUL LN MODESTO, CA 95355
003-160-023-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

WHITE KATHLEEN A TR ET AL &
WHITE THOMAS R TR 353 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-160-024-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

ROTHBERG JULIE & ROTHBERG
GREGG ROBERT 351 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-160-025-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 ALVAREZ JUANA ROSA 349 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-160-026-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 YU DAVID J TR & YU LYNN VANCE TR 347 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-160-027-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 LEBOW BENJAMIN 1687 STIRRUP LOOP HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-160-028-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

SAVAGE WILLIAM D TR & JENSEN
ELLEN M TR 1685 STIRRUP LOOP HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-160-029-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

QUIROZ MAURICE H & QUIROZ
KATHERINE R 1683 STIRRUP LOOP HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-160-030-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

BRIZZOLARA PAUL L & BRIZZOLARA
SHARON B 1681 STIRRUP LOOP HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-160-031-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

WALSH MARK J TR & WALSH DENISE
M TR 1680 STIRRUP LOOP HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-160-032-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

TOTH THOMAS TR & ANDERSON
ELIZABETH TR 1678 STIRRUP LOOP HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-160-033-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 KLINKE DIANE G TR 38253 GRANVILLE DR FREMONT, CA 94536 003-160-034-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

KONRAD WILLIAM R JR TR & KONRAD
GERTRUDE V TR 2480 MILL CREEK RD HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-160-035-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

ABBOTT JARED & SWANTON LINDSEY
E 1672 STIRRUP LOOP HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-160-036-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

MCGEE KEVIN & PENDERGAST
KATHLEEN 1670 STIRRUP LOOP HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-160-037-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 PELM NICHOLAS & PELM LINDA 1684 STIRRUP LOOP HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-160-038-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 BACH GALE W TR & BACH JOY C TR 1686 STIRRUP LOOP HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-160-039-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

SOENNICHSEN RICHARD H TR &
SOENNICHSEN SUSAN B TR 1688 STIRRUP LOOP HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-160-040-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

FILLIPONE JEFFREY & FILLIPONE
MARY ANNE 1690 STIRRUP LOOP HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-160-041-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

PETERSON JENEEN & PETERSON
JONATHAN 1661 STIRRUP LOOP HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-160-042-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 MANISCALCO GAETANO TR 1663 STIRRUP LOOP HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-160-043-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

MABRY RONALD H TR & MABRY
SHEILA MCGUINNESS TR 1665 STIRRUP LOOP HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-160-044-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

RADELFINGER SAM TR & SCARDACI
RITA TR 1667 STIRRUP LOOP HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-160-045-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 DEMOSTENE LEISA M PO BOX 934 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-160-046-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

PRISHTINA BASHKIM TR & PRISHTINA
MARY C TR 358 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-160-047-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 GREENE DAVID & HANFORD CARRIE A 360 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-160-048-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 CARPENTER AARON E ET AL 362 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-160-049-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

CLAR RICHARD S TR & CLAR
MARGARET TR 364 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-160-050-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

NICHOLS WILLIAM C TR & NICHOLS
KATHLEEN A TR 366 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-160-051-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

SLAGLE AUGUST WILLIAM & SLAGLE
SARAH ALEXANDRA 368 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-160-052-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 INEICH STEVEN C & INEICH DIANE M 370 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 2022-H-LLAD.xlsx 38

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District)

HEALDSBURG LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

SUBDIVISION APN USE
CODE
ESD
FACTOR
TOTAL

DWELLING
UNITS
(at Buildout)
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1
ASSESS
ZONE 2
ASSESS
ZONE 3
ASSESS
ZONE 4
ASSES
ZONE 5
ASSES
ZONE 6
ASSES
TOTAL

ASSESS PROPERTY OWNER OWNER ADDRESS
003-160-053-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 MCKAY THOMAS MICHAEL & COFFEYMCKAY KIMBERLEY ANNE 390 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-160-054-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

VICAR M DOUGLAS MAC TR & VICAR
SUSAN P MAC TR 392 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-160-055-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 STEVEN 394 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-160-056-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 MC DONEL PHILIP L & BARBARA 396 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-160-057-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

LYETH CAMERON TR & LYETH
TIFFANY TR 398 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-160-058-000 0001 0.0 0.0 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 CITY OF HEALDSBURG 401 GROVE ST HEALDSBURG, CA 95448

PARKLAND
FARMS

SUBDIVISION
PHASE 6 003-160-059-000 0001 0.5 1.0 0.5 $130.59 $103.42 $234.01 FRANCO KATHERINE 507 EL DORADO CT SANTA ROSA, CA 95404 003-160-060-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

AVILA ELADIO AVILA & AVILA MARIA
CAROLINA 1664 STIRRUP LOOP HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-160-061-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

RUETER JOCHEM M TR & RUETER JILL
A TR 372 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-160-062-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 MATNEY EDWARD R & DEVICO SUSAN 378 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-160-063-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

HUGHES ROLAND A & FREDERICK
JULIE A 384 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-160-064-000 0001 0.5 1.0 0.5 $130.59 $103.42 $234.01 NATASHA 400 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-160-065-000 0057 1.0 2.0 2.0 $522.36 $413.68 $936.04

LALONDE STEVEN JAMES TR &
LALONDE REBECCA SUE TR 406 ARABIAN WAY HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 SIENNA
POINTE
SUBDIVISION 003-170-001-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84

MASSELINK RANDALL TR & VENEZIANI
DONATELLA TR 135 PAUL WITTKE DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-170-002-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84 REILEY RONIE G TR 1565 ROSEWOOD DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-170-003-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84

DEPREEZ RONALD HERCULES &
COCHRAN COURTNEY 1569 ROSEWOOD DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-170-004-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84

LOPEZ EDWARD C & LOPEZ JENNIFER
E 1573 ROSEWOOD DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-170-005-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84

BRENNAN JEROME F TR & BRENNAN
CONSTANCE L TR 1577 ROSEWOOD DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-170-006-000 0001 0.5 1.0 0.5 $103.42 $103.42 UNGERLEIDER STEVEN TR 4030 OLD BARN RD HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-170-007-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84 SAIGAL CHAMPA & SAIGAL SANJAY 1585 ROSEWOOD DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-170-008-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84

BAKER EDWARD D TR & BAKER KYLE
R TR 1589 ROSEWOOD DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-170-009-000 0023 1.0 2.0 2.0 $413.68 $413.68 TR 1593 ROSEWOOD DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-170-010-000 0001 0.5 1.0 0.5 $103.42 $103.42 KAHN JAMES R TR 127 SIENNA CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-170-012-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84 KAHN JAMES R TR 127 SIENNA CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-170-013-000 0541 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84 HERRON WILLIAM P TR ET AL 1750 TAYLOR ST UNIT 802 SAN FRANCISCO,
CA 94133
003-170-014-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84

CAMPBELL GEORGE J III TR & MARY
JANE TR 1584 ROSEWOOD DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-170-015-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84

KEMP ALSON R TR & KEMP MARTHA G
TR 1580 ROSEWOOD DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-170-016-000 0051 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84

DARCY LUCREZIA L TR & DARCY
MICHAEL B TR 123 SIENNA CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448

PARKLAND
FARMS

SUBDIVISON
PARCEL "B" 003-180-001-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

MENDEZ JOSE L REYES & REYES
MARIA G MENDEZ DE 1719 PALOMINO CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-180-002-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 RODRIGUEZ LUIS 1723 PALOMINO CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-180-003-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

SMITH MATTHEW B TR & RIFF
KIMBERLY A TR 1727 PALOMINO CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-180-004-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 MOORE REBECCA N & DAVID J 1731 PALOMINO CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-180-005-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 GRUNER GREGORY & TERESA 1735 PALOMINO CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-180-006-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

PICKERING WAYNE LEON & GALINDO
HELEN 1739 PALOMINO CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-180-007-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 HAVILAND LINDA M 1748 PALOMINO CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-180-008-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 SILVEIRA ROBERT TR 1744 PALOMINO CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-180-009-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

BURTON WARREN J TR & BURTON
BOBBI A TR 1740 PALOMINO CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-180-010-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

COLLIN DAVID L TR & VANONI-COLLIN
ALINA M TR 1736 PALOMINO CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-180-011-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 BEARD JOHN V & CASTELLI TINA 1732 PALOMINO CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-180-012-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 MCDANIEL MARY M 1728 PALOMINO CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-180-013-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 LOVE MICHELE D 1724 PALOMINO CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-180-014-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 NOVELLA DIANA 1720 PALOMINO CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-180-015-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 SMITH CRAIG P & JESSIKA L ET AL 1716 PALOMINO CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 2022-H-LLAD.xlsx 39

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District)

HEALDSBURG LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

SUBDIVISION APN USE
CODE
ESD
FACTOR
TOTAL

DWELLING
UNITS
(at Buildout)
ESD
UNITS
ZONE 1
ASSESS
ZONE 2
ASSESS
ZONE 3
ASSESS
ZONE 4
ASSES
ZONE 5
ASSES
ZONE 6
ASSES
TOTAL

ASSESS PROPERTY OWNER OWNER ADDRESS

PARKLAND
FARMS

SUBDIVISON
PHASE 10B 003-180-016-000 0000 0.5 1.0 0.5 $130.59 $103.42 $234.01

GRAVES MICHAEL DAVID & PAGE
KATHLEEN REAVETTE 388 BRIDLE PATH HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-180-017-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

DOWNEY PAUL A TR & BEACHAM
HALLIE A TR 383 BRIDLE PATH HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-180-018-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

RODRIGUEZ J JAIME & RODRIGUEZ
ROSA E 1743 PALOMINO CT HEALDSBURG, CA 95448

ROSEWOOD
CREEK
SUBDIVISION 003-190-001-000 0051 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84 KLICK TYLER D & KLICK KAREN R 122 MOONLIGHT DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-190-002-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84

BOWMAN DAVID K & BOWMAN MEGAN
B 126 MOONLIGHT DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-190-003-000 0005 0.5 1.0 0.5 $103.42 $103.42

BOWMAN DAVID K & BOWMAN MEGAN
B 126 MOONLIGHT DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-190-004-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84 GONZALEZ GIANCARLO BIANCHETTI 134 MOONLIGHT DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-190-005-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84

GRABLE MICHAEL D TR & GRABLE

AMY K TR
17050 STATE HIGHWAY 128 CALISTOGA, CA
94515
003-190-006-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $206.84 $206.84

ROSSIE MATTHEW B & ROSSIE
WENDY A 129 MOONLIGHT DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-190-007-000 0000 0.0 0.0 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 CITY OF HEALDSBURG 703 2ND ST STE 200 SANTA ROSA, CA 95404

FANNY HILL
ESTATES 003-200-001-000 0019 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 MORALES TOMAS & MORALES LAURA 1568 ROSEWOOD DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-200-002-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

CARRUBBA FRANCIS P JR &
CARRUBBA PATRICIA A PO BOX 88 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-200-003-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

CARRUBBA FRANCIS P JR &
CARRUBBA PATRICIA A PO BOX 88 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-200-004-000 0051 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

BRIGGS AUGUST J TR & BRIGGS
SALLY R TR 231 POPPY HILL DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-200-005-000 0001 0.5 1.0 0.5 $130.59 $103.42 $234.01

BRIGGS AUGUST J TR & BRIGGS
SALLY R TR 231 POPPY HILL DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-200-006-000 0050 0.5 1.0 0.5 $130.59 $103.42 $234.01

CARRUBBA FRANCIS P JR TR &
CARRUBBA PATRICIA A TR PO BOX 88 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-200-007-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 GRAY JONATHAN D 220 POPPY HILL DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-200-008-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 EGAN WILLIAM K TR PO BOX 1948 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-200-009-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

HALSTEAD ROBERT J TR & HALSTEAD

SUSAN F TR
1567 CLEAR RIDGE DR HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-200-010-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

YAEGER MIKE S TR & YAEGER LEE

ANNE TR
1568 CLEAR RIDGE DR HEALDSBURG, CA
95448
003-200-011-000 0001 0.5 1.0 0.5 $130.59 $103.42 $234.01 DUNHAM CONSTANCE GAIL TR 49 PELICAN LN REDWOOD CITY, CA 94065 003-200-012-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02 CALLAHAN MICHAEL D TR & YOUNGCALLAHAN PHYLLIS E T1575 CLEAR RIDGE DR HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
003-200-013-000 0001 0.5 1.0 0.5 $130.59 $103.42 $234.01 BRETT MATTHEW M & BRETT KATIE R PO BOX 117 HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 003-200-014-000 0540 0.5 1.0 0.5 $130.59 $103.42 $234.01 MILLER BRIAN J TR & LAU DORA TR 1650 RAMONA WAY ALAMO, CA 94507 003-200-017-000 0000 0.5 1.0 0.5 $130.59 $103.42 $234.01 UNGERLEIDER STEVEN TR 66 COUNTRY CLUB RD EUGENE, OR 97401

PARKLAND
FARMS
SUBDIVISON 091-040-062-000 0930 0.0 0.0 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 CITY OF HEALDSBURG 401 GROVE ST HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 SENIOR
HOUSING 091-040-072-000 0044 1.0 24.0 24.0 $4,964.16 $2,682.24 $7,646.40

PARK LAND SENIOR APARTMENTS

INVESTORS LP
1425 CORPORATE CENTER PKWY SANTA
ROSA, CA 95407

PARKLAND
FARMS
SUBDIVISON 091-040-103-000 0920 0.0 0.0 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 CITY OF HEALDSBURG 401 GROVE ST HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 091-040-104-000 0010 1.0 1.0 1.0 $261.18 $206.84 $468.02

DADAOS JAMES G TR & DADAOS
MERRILEE TR 1695 STIRRUP LOOP HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
091-040-105-000 0930 0.0 0.0 0.0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 CITY OF HEALDSBURG 401 GROVE ST HEALDSBURG, CA 95448 ASSESSMENTS PER ZONE $98,856.63 $2,911.20 $104,867.88 $2,682.24 $24,173.58 $17,680.00 $251,171.53 ESD UNITS PER ZONE 378.50 60.00 507.00 24.00 37.00 34.00 2022-H-LLAD.xlsx 40

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 41 PART D

METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
FY 2022-23
Special and General Benefits
Each parcel within each of the zones of the Assessment District receives a distinct special benefit from improvements and maintenance thereof as discussed below.

Zone 1 – Parkland Hills Subdivision (Including Quarry Ridge) Zone 1 includes the maintenance of the landscaping, weed abatement and re-vegetation of various areas within the Parkland Hills Subdivision boundary, which includes the Quarry Ridge subdivision. The landscaping is at the entrance to Parkland Hills and along Parkland Farms Boulevard including the entrance median, along Saddle Draw, a portion of Bridle Path near Palomino Court, and a portion of Canyon Run south of Parkland Farms Boulevard. Weed abatement is done within the northwesterly area of this development including the detention basin area, and a central area south of Parkland Farms Boulevard. Re-vegetation and weed abatement are done along the Foss Creek area entirely within the subdivision.

The parcels within this zone receive a direct special benefit from the landscaping, weed abatement, creek re-vegetation and the maintenance thereof which include enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements, improved aesthetic appeal of the neighborhood, improved air quality from additional vegetation, fire safety from management of weeds and opportunity for recreation and dog walking in the open areas. The Zone 1 maintenance items have been determined to confer no general benefits to the community at large.

Zone 2 – Healdsburg Estates and River’s Landing Subdivisions Zone 2 consists of weed abatement along Paul Witke Drive. The parcels within this zone receive a direct special benefit from the weed abatement which includes enhanced fire safety from management of weeds. The Zone 2 maintenance items have been determined to confer no general benefits to the community at large.

Zone 3 – Barbieri Brothers Park and Healdsburg Avenue Frontage Landscaping Zone 3 includes the maintenance of Barbieri Brothers Park, located within the Parkland Hills Subdivision, and the frontage landscaping along Healdsburg Avenue within Area A. Barbieri Brothers Park was designated as mitigation for park area within North Healdsburg Avenue Specific Plan Area A Assessment District, indicating that all parcels within the boundary of Area A have been determined to receive a special benefit from this park.

The special benefits to each parcel in Zone 3 provided by Barbieri Brothers Park and frontage landscaping along Healdsburg Avenue include the readily accessible opportunity for recreation and enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements, improved

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 42 aesthetic appeal of the neighborhood and improved air quality from additional vegetation. The Zone 3 benefits within this assessment district have been determined to confer no general benefits to the community outside of Area A.

There are a number of parcels within the Area A boundary that have not yet been annexed into Zone 3. Because these parcels receive a special benefit for the landscaping and the park but do not contribute to its maintenance, the City contributes Community Services Funds to cover what would be the combined annual assessment of these parcels. Consequently, every parcel within Zone 3 pays only for the proportional special benefit conferred upon that parcel.

Zone 4 – Senior Housing
Zone 4 includes the maintenance of landscaping along Parkland Farms Boulevard. There is a single parcel in this zone that receives a direct special benefit from the landscaping maintenance.

The special benefit to this parcel, provided by this area and maintenance thereof include enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements, improved aesthetic appeal of the neighborhood and improved air quality from additional vegetation. The Zone 4 benefits within this assessment district have been determined to confer no general benefits to the community at large.

Zone 5 – Sonata Subdivision (including Grant Street Village) Zone 5 includes the maintenance associated with the trail along Foss Creek, the landscaping along Larkspur Drive within Grant Street Village and a small pocket park at Marigold Way and Healdsburg Avenue. The parcels within this zone receive a direct special benefit from the landscaping and maintenance of these areas.

The special benefits to each parcel in Zone 5 provided by these items and the maintenance thereof include enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements, improved aesthetic appeal of the neighborhood, improved air quality from additional vegetation, the opportunity for recreation and dog walking. The Foss Creek trail and the small pocket park have been determined to be too small to attract residents from outside of this subdivision. The Zone 5 maintenance items have been determined to confer no general benefits to the community at large.

Zone 6 – Sorrento Square Subdivision
Zone 6 includes the maintenance, lighting and related costs of back-on street landscaping along the portion of Healdsburg Avenue fronting this subdivision along with maintenance costs of a small pocket park within the subdivision along Monte Vista Avenue. Landscape maintenance in the pocket park includes the maintenance of tables and benches, a drinking fountain (including water costs), a concrete retaining wall and sidewalks within the pocket park. The parcels within this zone receive a direct special benefit from the landscaping, lighting and maintenance of these areas.

The special benefit to each parcel in Zone 6 provided by the landscaping and park maintenance

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 43 thereof include enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements, improved aesthetic appeal of the neighborhood, improved air quality from additional vegetation and the opportunity for recreation. The lights within this subdivision are spaced per adopted City standards, thereby providing the specific benefits of safety for vehicular traffic and pedestrian travel at night and safety lighting of the neighborhood in general.

The pocket park is very small and provides few park amenities, however it does provide special benefit to the Zone 6 parcels. It has been determined that residential parcels outside of Zone 6, within the same walking distance to the pocket park as the farthest Zone 6 parcel, also benefit from this pocket park. Because these parcels receive a special benefit from the park but are not within Zone 6 and do not contribute to its maintenance, the City contributes Community Services Funds to cover the combined special benefit value received by these parcels.

Consequently, every parcel within Zone 6 pays only for the proportional special benefit conferred upon that parcel. The pocket park has been determined to confer no general benefits to the community at large because of its small size and limited amenities.

Apportionment of the Assessments
The following is a brief description of the manner that the annual assessment has been apportioned to each parcel in Zones 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 within the Assessment District:

The method of apportionment equates all parcels within Zones 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 to an Equivalent Single-Family Dwelling (ESD) unit use, or portion thereof. The subdivisions in these Zones are:

Parkland Hills Subdivision (all phases), Quarry Ridge, Healdsburg Estates, Ridgeline Subdivision, Sienna Pointe Subdivision, Fanny Hill Estates Subdivision, River’s Landing, Rosewood Creek Subdivision, Rosewood Heights Subdivision, the Senior Housing Development, Sonata (Includes Grant Street Village), and Sorrento Square. The following basic use units reflect the relative benefit accruing to parcels of land within each Zone of the Healdsburg Landscaping & Lighting Assessment District depending on the type of land use and stage of development.

Use Units by Parcel Type
Parcel Type Use Units
Vacant parcel in undeveloped area 1/10 unit
Vacant parcel in developed area ½ unit
Single dwelling parcel 1 unit
Multiple dwelling unit parcels 1 unit per dwelling
Commercial parcel with no dwelling units 1 unit per business Commercial parcels with dwelling units 1 unit per business + 1 unit per dwelling unit Industrial parcel with no dwelling units 1 unit per business Industrial parcel with dwelling unit 1 unit per business + 1 unit per dwelling unit

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 44 Parcels without a dwelling used exclusively
for greenbelt, open space, drainage, or
common area of any planned unit
development
0 unit
Special Benefits in Zones 3 and 6:
 Zone 3: Various parcels outside of Zone 3 but located within Area A were identified as receiving special benefit from Barbieri Brothers Park and Healdsburg Avenue frontage maintenance. These benefitting parcels outside the Zone have been attributed ESD units in the same manner as parcels within the zone. Due to the type of land use and stage of development, these parcels currently represent 33 ESDs. Those 33 ESDs were added to the total number of ESDs within Zone 3 to total the ESD’s within Area A. The ratio of these 33 ESD’s over the total ESD’s in Area A represent the ratio of special benefit to parcels outside of Zone 3. This ratio times the budget determines the Community Services Fund contribution for this zone.
 Zone 6: Various residential parcels outside of Zone 6 but located within the same walking distance as parcels within Zone 6 were found to receive special benefits due to their proximity to the pocket park. These benefitting parcels outside the zone have been attributed ESD units in the same manner as parcels within the zone. Due to the type of land use and stage of development, those parcels currently represent 34 ESDs. Those 34 ESDs were added to the total number of ESDs within Zone 6 to determine the total ESD’s benefitting from the pocket park. The ratio of these 34 ESDs over the total ESDs benefitting from the pocket park represent the ratio of special benefit to parcels outside of Zone 6. This ratio times the park maintenance portion of the budget determines the Community Services Fund contribution for this zone.

For all Zones, once the determination is made of the total number of ESD units for each Zone, the total number of ESD units for each Zone shall be divided into each respective Zone’s total operation and maintenance expenses for the upcoming fiscal year, less any Community Services Fund contribution, resulting in the proposed annual assessment per (ESD) unit. The assessment per ESD for each Zone shall be multiplied by the total ESD units established/calculated for each parcel to determine the proposed total annual assessment for each parcel within each Zone.

It was determined that only Zones 3 and 6 have parcels outside of the zone that receive special benefit. As the Community Services Fund contribution from the City pays the special benefit value for parcels outside of the zone, parcels in Zones 3 and 6 pay only for the portion of the special benefits that they receive.

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 45 PART E
FY 2022-23 PROPERTY OWNERS LIST
The names and addresses of each of the property owners as shown on the County of Sonoma Assessor’s Tax Assessment Roll have been keyed into the special assessment number (Assessor Parcel Number) in Part C – Assessment Roll of this Engineer’s Report.

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 46 PART F
FY 2022-23 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Attached are the Assessment Diagrams (Maps) for the Zones within the Assessment District. The first Assessment Diagram is an overview map showing the locations of all Zones of the Assessment District. Please note the lines and dimensions of each parcel, as well as the distinctive Assessor’s Parcel Number, are shown on the Assessor's Maps for the City of Healdsburg. These Maps are available at the County of Sonoma Assessor's Office. The attached pages also provide the reference to the appropriate Assessor Books at the County of Sonoma Assessor’s Office for the respective subdivisions in each of the Zones.

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 47 Zone 1

All the land lying within the Parkland Hills Subdivision filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma, P.M. Number 146 Book, 578, Pages 36-37.

All the land lying within the Parkland Hills Subdivision filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma, A.P. Numbers 091-040-062, 105; 091-040-103, 104.

All the land lying within the Parkland Hills Phase 1 filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 563, Pages 6-10.

All the land lying within the Parkland Hills Phase 2 filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 580, Pages 21-25.

All the land lying within the Parkland Hills Phase 3 filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 580, Pages 26-29.

All the land lying within the Parkland Hills Phase 4 filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 593, Pages 6-9.

All the land lying within the Parkland Hills Phase 10A filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 621, Pages 19-22.

All the land lying within the Parkland Hills Phase 7 & 8 filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 589, Pages 35-39.

All the land lying within the Quarry Ridge Subdivision filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 595, Pages 1-4.

All the land lying within the Parkland Hills Phase 5 filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 600, Pages 40-44.

All the land lying within the Parkland Hills Phase 6 filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 610, Pages 40-43.

All the land lying within the Parkland Hills Phase 9 filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 620, Pages 30-33.

All the lands lying within the Parkland Hills, Phase 10B filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma, in Book 659, Pages 42-45.

All the lands lying within the Parkland Hills, Parcel B filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma, in Book 659, Pages 46-50.

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 48 Zone 2

All the land lying within the Healdsburg Estates Phase 1 filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 556, Pages 39-42.

All the land lying within the Healdsburg Estates Phase 2 filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 565, Pages 20-23.

All the land lying within the River’s Landing Subdivision filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma, in Book 660, Pages 22-25.

Zone 3
All the land lying within the Healdsburg Estates Phase 1 filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 556, Pages 39-42.

All the land lying within the Healdsburg Estates Phase 2 filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 565, Pages 20-23.

All the land lying within the Parkland Hills Subdivision filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma, P.M. Number 146 Book, 578, Pages 36-37.

All the land lying within the Parkland Hills Subdivision filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma, A.P. Numbers 091-040-062, 105; 091-040-103, 104.

All the land lying within the Parkland Senior Apartments Parcel filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma, A.P. Numbers 091-040-072.

All the land lying within the Fanny Hill Estates filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma, A.P. Numbers 091-050-060, 063.

All the land lying within the Parkland Hills Phase 1 filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 563, Pages 6-10.

All the land lying within the Parkland Hills Phase 2 filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 580, Pages 21-25.

All the land lying within the Parkland Hills Phase 3 filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 580, Pages 26-29.

All the land lying within the Parkland Hills Phase 4 filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 593, Pages 6-9.

All the land lying within the Parkland Hills Phase 10A filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 621, Pages 19-22.

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 49 All the land lying within the Parkland Hills Phase 7 & 8 filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 589, Pages 35-39.

All the land lying within the Quarry Ridge Subdivision filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 595, Pages 1-4.

All the land lying within the Parkland Hills Phase 5 filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 600, Pages. 40-44.

All the land lying within the Parkland Hills Phase 6 filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 610, Pages. 40-43.

All the land lying within the Parkland Hills Phase 9 filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 620, Pages. 30-33.

All the land lying within the Ridge Line Subdivision Phase 1 filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 617, Pages. 41-44.

All the lands lying within the Sienna Pointe Subdivision filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma in Book 647, Pages. 38-40.

All the lands lying within the River’s Landing Subdivision filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma, in Book 660, Pages 22-25.

All the lands lying within the Rosewood Creek Subdivision filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma, in Book 660, Pages 35-38.

All the lands lying within the Parkland Hills, Phase 10B filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma, in Book 659, Pages 42-45.

All the lands lying within the Parkland Hills, Parcel B filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma, in Book 659, Pages 46-50.

All the lands lying within the Rosewood Heights Subdivision filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma, in Book 698, Pages 17-21.

Zone 4
All the land lying within the Parkland Senior Apartments Parcel filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma, A.P. Numbers 091-040-072.

Zone 5
All the land lying within Grant Street Village Phase 1 filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma, in Book 718 of Maps, Pages 10-15,

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) 50 All the land lying within the Sonata Subdivision filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma, in Book 758 of Maps, Pages 1-3.

Zone 6
All the land lying within Midtowne Healdsburg Subdivision (now called Sorrento Square) filed in the Recorder’s Office of the County of Sonoma, in Book 771 of Maps, Pages 44-49.

F:\Projects\Healdsburg\LLAD\2022 hllad 09-4787\2022-H-Engr's Report-FFA.docx

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) Coastland Civil Engineering, Inc. HEALDSBURG LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM

7.D.b
Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) HEALDSBURG LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Coastland Civil Engineering, Inc.7.D.b Packet Pg. 388
Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) HEALDSBURG LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Coastland Civil Engineering, Inc.7.D.b Packet Pg. 389
Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) PARK (INCLUDES QUARRY RIDGE) SIENNA POINTE SUBDIVISION FANNY HILL ESTATES PARKLAND HILLS BROTHERS BARBIERI HEALDSBURG ESTATES CREEK ROSEWOOD RIDGELINE SUBDIVISION HOUSING SENIOR LANDING RIVER'S HEIGHTS ROSEWOOD NOT A PART Coastland Civil Engineering, Inc. HEALDSBURG LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 7.D.b Packet Pg. 390
Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) HEALDSBURG LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Coastland Civil Engineering, Inc.7.D.b Packet Pg. 391
Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) SONATA (INCLUDES GRANT STREET VILLAGE) HEALDSBURG LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM Coastland Civil Engineering, Inc.7.D.b Packet Pg. 392
Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District) SORRENTO SQUARE Coastland Civil Engineering, Inc. HEALDSBURG LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 7.D.b Packet Pg. 393
Attachment: Engineer's Report (3660 : Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District)

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: June 21, 2022
SUBJECT: An Ordinance Amending the Development Agreement by and between the City of Healdsburg and Kendal at Sonoma, a Zen Inspired Community, for the Enso Village Project
PREPARED BY: Scott Duiven, Community Development Director STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):

Expand Affordable Housing Opportunities
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Pass an ordinance amending the Development Agreement by and between the City of Healdsburg and Kendal at Sonoma, a Zen Inspired Community, for the Enso Village Project.

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:

On February 11, 2020, the Planning Commission approved an application by CCS Healdsburg, LLC, for a Master Conditional Use Permit (CUP 2019-04) and recommended that the City Council approve a Development Agreement for the North Village Project.

On April 6, 2020, the City Council approved a Development Agreement (DA 2020-01) with CCS Healdsburg, LLC for the North Village Project.

On November 17, 2020, the Planning Commission approved applications by Kendal at Sonoma, A Zen Inspired Community for a major design review permit (DR 2020-09) and a major conditional use permit (CUP 2020-02) for development of the Enso Village Senior Living Community.

On February 23, 2022, at a properly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-02 recommending that the City Council approve an Amendment to the Development Agreement for the Enso Village Project (DA 2020-01.01) to modify the affordability levels for 10 of the 30 affordable units in the Enso Village senior living community (Attachment 1).

On April 4, 2022, the City Council conducted a public hearing and introduced an ordinance amending the Development Agreement for the Enso Village Project. Notice of the City Council's

8.A
Packet Pg. 394
April 4, 2022, public hearing was published in a newspaper of local publication and mailed to property owners within 300' of the property boundaries.

On April 18, 2022, the City Council held off on adoption of the ordinance amending the Development Agreement for the Enso Village Project pending additional information about the marketing of the Moderate-Income senior units.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Healdsburg and CCS Healdsburg, LLC entered into the DA for the North Village Project on May 6, 2020. On August 20, 2020, pursuant to authority provided by Section 9.1 of the DA, CCS Healdsburg LLC and Kendal at Sonoma, A Zen Inspired Community ("Developer") entered into a Partial Assignment of Rights and Assumption of Obligations Under Development Agreement which, among other rights and obligations, assigns Section 5.4 of the DA to the Developer.

Section 5.4 calls for the development of thirty (30) units of affordable housing within the Senior Living Community component of the Project, with twenty (20) units designated as Very Low Income and restricted to use by employees and volunteers of the Senior Living Community who also qualify per the age restrictions of the Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) license. An additional 10 Moderate Income units would be made available to the public, subject to local preference requirements defined in the DA.

An amendment to the DA that would be by and between the City of Healdsburg and Developer is proposed ("Amendment"). The Amendment was considered by the Planning Commission at a public hearing on February 23, 2022, and the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-22 recommending that the City Council approve the Amendment.

On April 4, 2022, the City Council conducted a public hearing, waived the first reading and introduced an ordinance approving the Amendment. Subsequently, on April 18, 2022, the Council deferred action on the ordinance in order to receive additional information regarding the marketing of the Moderate-Income units in accordance with the local preference requirements defined in the DA. Additional information has been provided by the Developer and is summarized below.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

The proposed "Amendment" is appended to the Ordinance in Attachment 2. The Amendment modifies a portion of the DA that was assigned to the Developer, specifically the affordability requirements in Section 5.4 of the DA pertaining to housing units designated for Very LowIncome households for employees and volunteers within the senior living community. This amendment is requested because the Developer determined that not all of the employees/volunteers who will utilize this affordable housing have incomes that are within the Very Low-Income threshold.

Section 5.4 calls for the development of thirty (30) units of "Senior Living Community Affordable Housing" within the Senior Living Community component of the Project, with twenty (20) units designated for Very Low-Income households. These Very Low-Income units

8.A
Packet Pg. 395
are restricted to use by employees and volunteers of the Senior Living Community who qualify for the age restrictions of the RCFE license. An additional ten (10) Moderate Income units are required to be made available to the public, subject to local preference requirements. No alterations are requested for these Moderate-Income units.

To align the income requirements in the DA with the actual incomes of the employees and volunteers of the Senior Living Community, the Amendment would modify Section 5.4 as follows:
▪ Five (5) of the Very Low-Income units would be converted to Moderate Income units, and five (5) of the Very Low-Income units would be converted to Low-Income units. The remaining ten (10) units would continue to be available to Very Low-Income households.

When the City approved the DA, the intention was for a portion of the Senior Living Community to be reserved as housing for employees and volunteers at the facility to provide workforce housing opportunities on-site. To ensure that the housing was accessible, City and the Developer agreed to affordability levels for the units based on assumptions about the income levels of the employees and volunteers. However, the Developer has since determined that some employees and volunteers would be over the previously assumed income levels. As noted above, the modifications to the affordability requirements established in the DA are necessary to accommodate the City and Developer's intention to house 20 senior Zen teachers at the facility.

The Developer submitted the following statement justifying the requested change:

Two sizes of units for the Zen Teachers are available – 550 sq ft units meant for single teachers and 650 sq ft units meant to be shared by couples. The teachers with the most seniority, who have been living at San Francisco Zen Center for 40 years or more and receiving a small monthly stipend plus room and board, and devoting their lives to teaching meditation, have partners who were allowed to be employed outside San Francisco Zen center. These partners did accrue income and invested it, causing the couples to have required minimum distributions, and in some cases pensions and higher social security. Their income exceeds that allowed for couples at the Very Low-Income level. However, they can all easily fit within the Moderate-Income level. Therefore, we are requesting 5 of the Very Low-Income units become Moderate-Income units.

Also, a few of the Zen teachers have other assets, and their dividends and/or pensions that were earned before spending their required 20 years in residence at San Francisco Zen Center cause them to be slightly over the Very Low-Income limit. Therefore, we request that 5 of the Very Low-Income units become Low-Income units.

Staff recommends that this modification be approved, as the 20 Very Low-Income units were intended for and are restricted to employees who meet the age-restrictions of the facility.

Modifying the affordability requirements for 10 of those units will make it possible for the Developer to meet that intention by aligning the affordability requirements with the actual incomes of the employees and volunteers of the Senior Living Community.

8.A
Packet Pg. 396
While not directly related to the Amendment, at the public hearing questions were raised regarding the marketing of the Moderate-Income units that are subject to the City's local preference requirements. The Developer has submitted a letter addressing the marketing of the Moderate-Income units (Attachment 3, Plan for Local Preference for Moderate Income Units).

The letter outlines efforts that were employed for the initial marketing of the 10 ModerateIncome units in accordance with the Affordable Housing Marketing Plan. The letter explains that those efforts did not result in the reservation of any of the Moderate-Income units by Healdsburg residents. The letter notes, however, that 17 of the project's market rate units have been reserved by Healdsburg households.

The Developer has identified a number of additional marketing efforts that will be undertaken in the future to "support the best prospect of assembling a list of Healdsburg candidates" for the Middle-Income units for future openings. These include:
▪ Making two presentations a year at the Healdsburg Senior Center and advertising in the Senior Center Newsletter.
▪ Advertising in the local paper once a year.
▪ Providing an option for Healdsburg residents that ties the entrance fees for the ModerateIncome units to the resident contracts for Enso Village that allow for zero percent return of the entrance fee upon moving out of the community. This would place those entrance fees at approximately 50% of the median home value in Sonoma County. ▪ Creating a "scholarship" fund for local and diverse residents to help contribute to the cost of the entrance fees and monthly fees. Enso Village would seed the fund by contributing $50,000 per year for 10 years ($500,000) and the fund would be made available for contributions from Enso Village residents.

These commitments will be memorialized in an amended Affordable Housing Regulatory Agreement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenants to be recorded against the 32-acre Enso Village property.

ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:

Development of the Enso Village Senior Living Community is required to comply with mitigation measures for the North Village Project as contained in and required by the Final Environmental Impact Report for the North Village Project, including all mitigation monitoring and reporting.

ALTERNATIVES:

It is recommended that the City Council conduct the second reading, by title only and waiving reading of the text, and enact an Ordinance approving an Amendment to the Development Agreement for the North Village Project as recommended by the Planning Commission.

Alternatively, the City Council could consider the following actions:
1) Reintroduce the Ordinance with minor revisions to the Amendment,

8.A
Packet Pg. 397
2) Direct that significant changes be made to the Amendment and refer the matter back to the Planning Commission for review of those changes, or 3) Deny the Amendment in which case the provisions of the existing DA would remain intact.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The Enso Village Project is a privately funded development. The Project will generate property and sales tax revenues which will help to offset the City's costs of providing services to the Project. In accordance with the Development Agreement, the nonprofit Senior Living Community developer and operator is required to record a Payment-In-Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) Agreement against the Senior Living Community parcel to reimburse the City for lost property tax revenue in the event that the Senior Living Community receives a "welfare exemption" from ad valorem property taxes, plus the cost of increased demands for services from the City's Fire Department. The annual payment shall equal approximately $334,000, with increases each year based on the Consumer Price Index.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

Any environmental impacts related to the Development Agreement for the North Village project have been reviewed and considered in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. On May 20, 2019, the City Council certified the Final Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for the North Entry Area Plan (State Clearinghouse No. 2018062041) and adopted related findings, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations which can be found in the Planning Department’s files for the North Village Project at 401 Grove Street, Healdsburg, CA 95448. In accordance with the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15162, no further environmental review is required for the Amendment because (i) there are no changes involving new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects/impacts, (ii) there are no changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is taken which will require major revisions to the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects/impacts, and (iii) there is no new information of substantial importance that was not known at the time the EIR was certified which shows (a) the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR, (b) significant impacts/effects will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR, (c) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects/impacts, or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects/impacts on the environment.

ATTACHMENT(S):

PC Resolution No. 2022-02 Amendment to North Village DA Ordinance-1st Amendment to North Village DA (Enso)
Plan for Local Preference for Moderate Income Units (05-25-22)

8.A
Packet Pg. 398
PC Resolution 2022-02
1 Planning Commission Resolution 2022-02

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE

CITY OF HEALDSBURG RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY

COUNCIL APPROVE THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE NORTH VILLAGE
PROJECT (DA 2020-01.01)
WHEREAS, the City of Healdsburg, a California municipal corporation (the “City”) and CCS Healdsburg, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company are Parties to that certain Development Agreement, dated May 6, 2020; a Memorandum of Development Agreement was recorded in the Official Records of Sonoma County on June 1, 2020, as Document No. 2020041464 (“Development Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, the Development Agreement governs the development of approximately 32- acre property located at 16977 Healdsburg Avenue with a Senior Living Community with 221 independent living units (including 11 density bonus units), ancillary facilities (including dining facilities, meeting rooms, and administrative offices) and a total of 54 assisted living and memory care beds; 30 multi-family apartments; a 108-key hotel with a restaurant/bar, fitness facility and spa, meetings rooms and other amenities; and 45 multi-family units, five live-work units, and 12,000 square feet of commercial/retail space in a mixed use development; and WHEREAS, on August 20, 2020, pursuant to authority provided by Section 9.1 of the Development Agreement, CCS Healdsburg, LLC ("Assignor") and Kendal at Sonoma, A Zen Inspired Community ("Developer") entered into a Partial Assignment of Rights and Assumption of Obligations Under Development Agreement which was recorded in the Official Records of Sonoma County on August 20, 2020, as Instrument No. 2020071885 (“Partial Assignment”); and WHEREAS, Section 5.4 of the Development Agreement was assigned to the Developer under the Partial Assignment. This Section 5.4 calls for the development of thirty (30) units of Senior Living Community Affordable Housing within the Senior Living Community component of the Project, with twenty (20) units designated as Very Low Income, which were restricted to use by employees and volunteers of the Senior Living Community, and who qualified for the age restrictions of the Residential Care Facility for the Elderly ("RCFE") license. An additional 10 Moderate income units were made available to the public, subject to local preference requirements defined in Development Agreement Section 5.3(a); and
WHEREAS, City staff and Developer have prepared a proposed First Amendment to the Development Agreement ("First Amendment") for consideration by the Healdsburg Planning Commission and the Healdsburg City Council and the First Amendment is intended to align the affordability requirements for the Senior Living Community Affordable Housing that is restricted to employees and volunteers of the Senior Living Community who are qualified for the age restrictions of the RCFE license with the incomes of those employees and volunteers; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Sections 65864 through 65869.5 of the California Government Code (“State Development Agreement Law”), the City adopted Ordinance No. 1097

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: PC Resolution No. 2022-02 Amendment to North Village DA (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) PC Resolution 2022-02
2 to add Chapter 17.20 to the Healdsburg Municipal Code authorizing the use of, and imposing additional requirements on, development agreements; and WHEREAS, Chapter 17.20.060 requires the Planning Commission to conduct a public hearing on an amendment to a development agreement; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Res. Code § 21000, et seq.) ("CEQA"), the City prepared and, on May 20, 2019, the City Council certified the Final Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for the North Entry Area Plan (State Clearinghouse No. 2018062041) and adopted related findings, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations which can be found in the Planning Department’s files for the North Village Project at 401 Grove Street, Healdsburg, CA 95448; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a noticed public hearing on February 23, 2022, for the purpose of receiving oral testimony on the proposed First Amendment, reviewed written and oral staff reports, and received into the record all pertinent documents related to the First Amendment, before making its decision.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Healdsburg Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council that the First Amendment to the Development Agreement by and between the City of Healdsburg and CCS Healdsburg LLC (DA 2020-01.01) be approved as presented in Attachment A to this resolution based upon the facts and findings as set forth below:

1. The Development Agreement and its First Amendment are consistent with the Healdsburg 2030 General Plan, the North Entry Area Plan, and the Land Use Code. The City Council made findings of consistency in its action to adopt Ordinance No. 1202, approving the Development Agreement, and the First Amendment does not modify the Development Agreement in any way that would conflict with the goals and policies of the Healdsburg 2030 General Plan and the North Entry Area Plan, and requirements of the City's Land Use Code.

2. The Development Agreement and its First Amendment will provide Healdsburg with tangible benefits including: 105 units of Affordable and Middle Income Housing; a $2,000,000 contribution for construction of a Fire Substation; contribution of $250,000 to the City for connectivity improvements; annual payments to the City of approximately $334,000 per year from the Senior Living Community for lost tax revenue and increased demands for services; remittance of a 1/2% Hotel Add-On Fee (beginning 10 years after issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the hotel); and other improvements.

3. Any environmental impacts related to the Development Agreement have been reviewed and considered in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. On May 20, 2019, the City Council certified the Final Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for the North Entry Area Plan (State Clearinghouse No. 2018062041) and adopted related findings, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations which can be found in the Planning Department’s files for the North Village Project at 401 Grove Street, Healdsburg, CA 95448. In accordance with the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15162, no further environmental review is required for the First Amendment because (i) there are no changes involving new significant environmental effects or a substantial

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: PC Resolution No. 2022-02 Amendment to North Village DA (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) PC Resolution 2022-02
3 increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects/impacts, (ii) there are no changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is taken which will require major revisions to the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects/impacts, and (iii) there is no new information of substantial importance that was not known at the time the EIR was certified which shows (a) the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR, (b) significant impacts/effects will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR, (c) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects/impacts, or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects/impacts on the environment.

DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED by the Healdsburg Planning Commission on the 23rd day of February 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

APPROVED: ATTEST:
____________________________ _____________________________ Jerry Eddinger, CHAIR Scott Duiven, SECRETARY

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: PC Resolution No. 2022-02 Amendment to North Village DA (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) PC Resolution 2022-02
4 ATTACHMENT A

FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
This First Amendment to Development Agreement (this “Agreement”) is entered into this ___ day of __________, 2022, by and between the City of Healdsburg, a California municipal corporation (the “City”), and Kendal at Sonoma, a Zen Inspired Community, a California nonprofit public benefit company (“Developer”), and has been approved and agreed to by CCS Healdsburg, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignor”). The City and Developer are referred to herein individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”.

RECITALS
A. Under the authority of Ordinance No. 1202, the City and Assignor entered into a Development Agreement (the “Development Agreement”), the effective date of which is May 6, 2020. The Development Agreement was recorded in the Official Records of Sonoma County on June 1, 2020, as Instrument No. 2020041464. The Development Agreement governs the development of approximately 32-acre property located at 16977 Healdsburg Avenue (APNs 091- 060-009; -019; -022; -025): Senior Living Community with 221 independent living units (including 11 density bonus units), ancillary facilities (including dining facilities, meeting rooms, and administrative offices) and a total of 54 assisted living and memory care beds; 30 multi-family apartments; a 108-key hotel with a restaurant/bar, fitness facility and spa, meetings rooms and other amenities; and 45 multi-family units, five live-work units, and 12,000 square feet of commercial/retail space in a mixed use development. Backbone infrastructure includes the following: a new traffic signal on Healdsburg Avenue at the site entry; Healdsburg Avenue frontage improvements which include curbs, gutters, landscaping and lighting; two private streets including sidewalks, lighting, landscaping, and underground utilities; establishment of a secondary emergency vehicle access; extension of a segment of the Foss Creek Pathway; and establishment of Perimeter Trail (collectively, the “Project”).

B. In addition to the Development Agreement, the Project required, and received from the City, certain entitlements, including approval of a Conditional Use Permit, which was approved by the City Council on April 6, 2020, pursuant to findings and subject to conditions of approval (“CUP Conditions”).

C. In addition, on August 20, 2020, pursuant to authority provided by Section 9.1 of the Development Agreement, the Assignor and Developer entered into a Partial Assignment of Rights and Assumption of Obligations Under Development Agreement which was recorded in the Official Records of Sonoma County on August 20, 2020, as Instrument No. 2020071885 (“Partial Assignment”).

D. Section 5.4 of the Development Agreement was assigned to the Developer under the Partial Assignment. This Section 5.4 calls for the development of thirty (30) units of Senior Living Community Affordable Housing within the Senior Living Community component of the Project, with twenty (20) units designated as Very Low Income, which were restricted to use by

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: PC Resolution No. 2022-02 Amendment to North Village DA (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) PC Resolution 2022-02
5 employees and volunteers of the Senior Living Community, and who qualified for the age restrictions of the RCFE license. An additional ten (10) Moderate Income units were made available to the public, subject to local preference requirements defined in Development Agreement Section 5.3(a). To assist with the feasibility of this portion of the Project by aligning the income requirements in the Development Agreement with the actual incomes of the employees and volunteers of the Senior Living Community, Developer has requested and City has agreed to convert five (5) Very Low Income units to Moderate Income, and to convert an additional five (5) Very Low Income units to Low Income units.

E. On _____________, 2022, the Planning Commission, after a duly noticed public hearing, recommended approval of this Agreement. On ______________, after a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council introduced its Ordinance _________ approving this Agreement and authorizing its execution and adopted that Ordinance __________ on ____________.

Ordinance ____________ became effective on _____________.

Now, therefore, the City and Developer, for valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, agree as follows:

1. This Agreement constitutes a Major Amendment to the Development Agreement for the Project in accordance with Section 6.4(b) of the Development Agreement.

2. Senior Living Community Affordable Housing.
a. Sections 5.4(a) and 5.4(b) of the Development Agreement are amended and restated in their entirety as follows:
(a) Developer shall cause construction of a minimum of thirty (30) units of Senior Living Community Affordable Housing within the Senior Living Community component of the Project, affordable to households with very low, low, and moderate incomes, as follows:
i. Ten (10) dwelling units shall be made available for occupancy at an affordable Monthly Housing Fee or rent, adjusted for household size, to Very Low Income Households.
ii. Five (5) dwelling units shall be made available for occupancy at an affordable Monthly Housing Fee or rent, adjusted for household size, to Low Income Households.
iii. Fifteen (15) dwelling units shall be made available for occupancy at an affordable Monthly Housing Fee or rent, adjusted for household size, to Moderate Income Households.
b. Twenty units, comprised of the Senior Living Community Affordable Housing for Very Low, Low and five (5) of the Moderate Income Households shall be reserved for employees and volunteers of the Senior Living Community. The Senior Living Community Affordable Housing for the remaining ten (10) Moderate Income Households shall be subject

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: PC Resolution No. 2022-02 Amendment to North Village DA (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) PC Resolution 2022-02
6 to the local preference requirements described in Section 5.3(a) of this Agreement.

3. Interpretation. This Agreement shall be interpreted to give each of the provisions their plain and fair meaning. The Recitals set forth above are incorporated into this Agreement.

The section headings used herein are solely for convenience and shall not be used to interpret this Agreement. The Parties acknowledge that this Agreement is the product of negotiation and compromise on the part of both Parties, and the Parties agree, that since all have participated in the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement, this Agreement shall not be construed as if prepared by one of the Parties, but rather according to its plain and fair meaning as a whole, as if all Parties had prepared it.

4. Integration. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to its subject matter and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding they may have had prior to the execution of this Agreement. This Agreement shall not be amended or modified except by a written agreement executed by each of the Parties.

5. Inconsistencies. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the provisions of this Agreement and the Development Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall control.

6. Severability. If any term, provision, condition or covenant of this Agreement or its application to any Party or circumstances shall be held by a court of competent jurisdiction, to any extent, invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of the term, provision, condition, or covenant to persons or circumstances other than those as to whom or which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected, and shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law unless the rights and obligations of the Parties have been materially altered or abridged thereby.

7. Status of Agreement. Except as modified by this Agreement, the terms and provisions of the Development Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

8. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts by the Parties hereto and shall be the binding agreement of the Parties upon execution by each of them of one or more copies hereof.

9. Recording of Memorandum. Approximately concurrent with the Amendment’s effective date, the Parties shall execute, acknowledge and record a Memorandum of Agreement, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B, in the official records of Sonoma County.

10. Authority. Each of the persons signing this Agreement hereby represents and warrants that he or she is fully authorized to sign this Agreement on behalf of the Party for which he or she is signing.

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: PC Resolution No. 2022-02 Amendment to North Village DA (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) PC Resolution 2022-02
7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have affixed their signatures to this Agreement as of the date and year indicated below and effective as of the date and year first above written.
[Signatures on Following Page]

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: PC Resolution No. 2022-02 Amendment to North Village DA (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) PC Resolution 2022-02
8 DEVELOPER:

KENDAL AT SONOMA, A ZEN

INSPIRED COMMUNITY
a California nonprofit public benefit
company
By: _____________________________

CITY:

CITY OF HEALDSBURG,
a California municipal corporation
By: _____________________________
Jeff Kay, City Manager
ATTEST:
________________________________
Raina Allan, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________
Samantha Zutler, City Attorney

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: PC Resolution No. 2022-02 Amendment to North Village DA (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) KENDAL DA Amdt v.1

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
The real property situated in the City of Healdsburg, County of Sonoma, State of California, described as follows:

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: PC Resolution No. 2022-02 Amendment to North Village DA (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) KENDAL DA Amdt v.1

EXHIBIT B

FORM OF MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City of Healdsburg
401 Grove Street
Healdsburg, CA 95448
Attention: City Clerk

EXEMPT FROM RECORDING FEES
PER GOVERNMENT CODE §27383

AND BUILDING HOMES & JOBS

TRUST FUND FEE PER

GOVERNMENT CODE
§27388.1(a)(2)(D)
Space above this line for Recorder’s use.

MEMORANDUM OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
This Memorandum of First Amendment to Development Agreement (this “Memorandum”), dated for reference purposes as of _________, 2022, is executed by and between the CITY OF HEALDSBURG, a California municipal corporation (“City”), and KENDAL AT SONOMA, A ZEN INSPIRED COMMUNITY, a California nonprofit public benefit company (“Developer”) and has been approved and agreed to by CCS HEALDSBURG, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignor”).

WHEREAS, City and Assignor have entered into a Development Agreement (the “Development Agreement”), the effective date of which is May 6, 2020, which was recorded in the Official Records of Sonoma County on June 1, 2020, as Instrument No. 2020041464. The Development Agreement pertains to the development of certain property (the “Property”) located in Healdsburg, California, as more particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto; and WHEREAS, Assignor and Developer have entered into a Partial Assignment of Rights and Assumption of Obligations Under Development Agreement (the “Partial Assignment”) dated August 20, 2020, which was recorded in the Official Records of Sonoma County on August 21, 2020 as Instrument No. 2020071885; and
WHEREAS, City and Developer have entered into a First Amendment to Development Agreement (the “[First Amendment”), dated _______, 2022.

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: PC Resolution No. 2022-02 Amendment to North Village DA (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) KENDAL DA Amdt v.1

1. This Memorandum is solely to provide record notice of the First Amendment and in no way modifies the terms, conditions, provisions and covenants thereof. In the event of any inconsistency between this Memorandum and First Amendment, the First Amendment shall prevail. The foregoing recitals are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.

Each exhibit referred to herein is attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

2. The City and Developer agree that this Memorandum may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and said counterparts shall together constitute one and the same agreement, binding all of the parties hereto, notwithstanding all of the parties are not signatory to the original or the same counterparts.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Developer have caused this Memorandum to be executed as of the date first above written.

DEVELOPER:

KENDAL AT SONOMA, A ZEN

INSPIRED COMMUNITY
a California nonprofit public benefit
company
By: _____________________________
, President
CITY:

CITY OF HEALDSBURG,
a California municipal corporation
By: _____________________________
Jeff Kay, City Manager
ATTEST:
________________________________
Raina Allan, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________
Samantha Zutler, City Attorney

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: PC Resolution No. 2022-02 Amendment to North Village DA (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) PC Resolution 2022-02 12

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California )
) ss
County of Sonoma )
On ,20__, before me,___________________________________________, (Name of Notary)
notary public, personally appeared _________________________________________________ who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
(Notary Signature)
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: PC Resolution No. 2022-02 Amendment to North Village DA (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) PC Resolution 2022-02 13

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California )
) ss
County of Sonoma )
On ,20__, before me,___________________________________________, (Name of Notary)
notary public, personally appeared _________________________________________________ who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
(Notary Signature)
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: PC Resolution No. 2022-02 Amendment to North Village DA (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) PC Resolution 2022-02 14

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
The real property situated in the City of Healdsburg, County of Sonoma, State of California, described as follows:

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: PC Resolution No. 2022-02 Amendment to North Village DA (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading)

CITY OF HEALDSBURG
ORDINANCE NO. ___

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF HEALDSBURG APPROVING A FIRST

AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF HEALDSBURG AND

KENDAL AT SONOMA, A ZEN INSPIRED

COMMUNITY FOR THE ENSO VILLAGE PROJECT
LOCATED AT 1801 BOXHEART DRIVE,
HEALDSBURG AVENUE (DA 2020-01.01)
WHEREAS, under the authority of Ordinance No. 1202, the City of Healdsburg, a California municipal corporation (the “City”) and CCS Healdsburg, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company entered into a Development Agreement, dated May 6, 2020; and a Memorandum of Development Agreement was recorded in the Official Records of Sonoma County on June 1, 2020, as Instrument No. 2020-041464 (“Development Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the Development Agreement governs the development of an approximately 32-acre property located at 16977 Healdsburg Avenue with a Senior Living Community with 221 independent living units, ancillary facilities including dining facilities, meeting rooms, and administrative offices, and a total of 54 assisted living and memory care beds; 30 multi-family apartments; a 108-key hotel with a restaurant/bar, fitness facility and spa, meetings rooms and other amenities; and 45 multi-family units, five live-work units, and 12,000 square feet of commercial/retail space in a mixed use development ("Project"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to authority provided by Section 9.1 of the Development Agreement, CCS Healdsburg, LLC and Kendal at Sonoma, A Zen Inspired Community, a California nonprofit public benefit company ("Developer") entered into a Partial Assignment of Rights and Assumption of Obligations Under Development Agreement which was recorded in the Official Records of Sonoma County on August 20, 2020, as Instrument No. 2020-071885 (“Partial Assignment”); and WHEREAS, among other rights and obligations, Section 5.4 of the Development Agreement was assigned to the Developer under the Partial Assignment. This Section 5.4 calls for the development of thirty (30) units of Senior Living Community Affordable Housing within the Senior Living Community component of the Project, with twenty (20) units designated as Very Low Income, which were restricted to use by employees and volunteers of the Senior Living Community, and who qualified for the age restrictions of the RCFE license. An additional ten (10) Moderate income units were made available to the public, subject to local preference requirements defined in Development Agreement Section 5.3(a); and
WHEREAS, to assist with the feasibility of the Senior Living Community portion of the Project by aligning the income requirements in the Development Agreement with the actual incomes of the employees and volunteers of the Senior Living Community who are qualified for the age restrictions of the Residential Care Facility for the Elderly license, Developer has requested

8.A.b
Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: Ordinance-1st Amendment to North Village DA (Enso) (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) Ordinance No. ___

authorize the conversion of five (5) Very Low Income Units to Moderate Income, and conversion of an additional five (5) Very Low Income units to Low Income; and WHEREAS, City staff and Developer have prepared a proposed First Amendment to the Development Agreement ("First Amendment") for consideration by the Healdsburg Planning Commission and the Healdsburg City Council; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Sections 65864 through 65869.5 of the California Government Code (“State Development Agreement Law”), the City adopted Ordinance No. 1097 to add Chapter 17.20 to the Healdsburg Municipal Code authorizing the use of, and imposing additional requirements on, development agreements; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Res. Code § 21000, et seq.), the City prepared and, on May 20, 2019, the City Council certified the Final Environmental Impact Report for the North Entry Area Plan (State Clearinghouse No. 2018062041) and adopted related findings, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations which can be found in the Planning Department’s files for the North Village Project at 401 Grove Street, Healdsburg, CA 95448; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 17.20.060 of the Healdsburg Municipal Code, the Planning Commission held a noticed public hearing on February 23, 2022, for the purpose of receiving oral testimony on, deliberating, and making a recommendation regarding the proposed First Amendment. The Commission considered all public comments received and all pertinent documents, including the Staff Report dated February 23, 2022, regarding the proposed First Amendment, and by Resolution No. 2022-02, recommended approval of the First Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Healdsburg City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the First Amendment on March 21, 2022, reviewed the written and verbal staff reports, took testimony, and received into the record all pertinent documents related to the Project.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED that the Healdsburg City Council hereby approves the First Amendment to the Development Agreement by and between the City of Healdsburg and Kendal at Sonoma, A Zen Inspired Community, as presented in Exhibit 1 to this ordinance and based upon the facts and findings as set forth below:

Section 1. Findings.

1. The foregoing Recitals are true and correct and by this reference are made a part hereof.

2. The Development Agreement and its First Amendment are consistent with the Healdsburg 2030 General Plan, the North Entry Area Plan, and the Land Use Code.

The City Council made findings of consistency in its action to adopt Ordinance No. 1202, approving the Development Agreement, and the First Amendment does not

8.A.b
Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: Ordinance-1st Amendment to North Village DA (Enso) (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) Ordinance No. ___

modify the Development Agreement in any way that would conflict with the goals and policies of the Healdsburg 2030 General Plan and the North Entry Area Plan, and requirements of the City's Land Use Code.

3. The Development Agreement and its First Amendment will provide Healdsburg with tangible benefits including: a 221-unit Senior Living Community with 30 units of Affordable Housing; 80 additional units of Affordable and Middle Income Housing; a $2,000,000 contribution for construction of a Fire Substation; contribution of $250,000 to the City for connectivity improvements; annual payments to the City of approximately $334,000 per year from the Senior Living Community for lost tax revenue and increased demands for services; remittance of a 1/2% Hotel Add-On Fee (beginning 10 years after issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the hotel); and other improvements.

4. Any environmental impacts related to the Development Agreement have been reviewed and considered in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. On May 20, 2019, the City Council certified the Final Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for the North Entry Area Plan (State Clearinghouse No. 2018062041) and adopted related findings, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations which can be found in the Planning Department’s files for the North Village Project at 401 Grove Street, Healdsburg, CA 95448. In accordance with the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15162, no further environmental review is required for the First Amendment because (i) there are no changes involving new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects/impacts, (ii) there are no changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is taken which will require major revisions to the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects/impacts, and (iii) there is no new information of substantial importance that was not known at the time the EIR was certified which shows (a) the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR, (b) significant impacts/effects will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR, (c) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects/impacts, or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects/impacts on the environment.

Section 2. Approval and Execution. The City Council hereby approves the First Amendment to the Development Agreement, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 1, subject to such minor and clarifying changes consistent with the terms thereof as may be approved by the City Attorney prior to execution hereof. The City Council further authorizes the City Manager to execute the First Amendment on behalf of the City.

8.A.b
Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: Ordinance-1st Amendment to North Village DA (Enso) (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) Ordinance No. ___

Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase or word of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, unlawful or otherwise invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed and adopted this Ordinance and each and all provisions thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more of said provisions may be declared unconstitutional, unlawful or otherwise invalid.

Section 4. Effective and Operative Dates. This Ordinance of the City of Healdsburg shall be effective thirty (30) days after the date of its passage. Before expiration of fifteen days after its passage, this ordinance or a summary thereof as provided in Government Code Section 36933, shall be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Healdsburg, along with the names of the City Council voting for and against its passage.

This ordinance was introduced by the City Council of the City of Healdsburg, County of Sonoma, at a regular meeting thereof on the 21st day of March, 2022, and passed and adopted on the 21st day of June, 2022 by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAINING: Councilmembers:

SO ORDERED ATTEST
__________________________________ _____________________________________ Osvaldo Jimenez, Mayor Raina Allan, City Clerk
Dated: ___________________________

8.A.b
Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: Ordinance-1st Amendment to North Village DA (Enso) (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) 2036\02\2949576.2
11/17/2020
EXHIBIT 1

FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is entered into this ___ day of __________, 2022, by and between the City of Healdsburg, a California municipal corporation (the “City”), and Kendal at Sonoma, a Zen Inspired Community, a California nonprofit public benefit company (“Developer”), and has been approved and agreed to by CCS Healdsburg, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignor”). The City and Developer are referred to herein individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”.

RECITALS
A. Under the authority of Ordinance No. 1202, the City and Assignor entered into a Development Agreement (the “Development Agreement”), the effective date of which is May 6, 2020. The Development Agreement was recorded in the Official Records of Sonoma County on June 1, 2020, as Instrument No. 2020041464. The Development Agreement governs the development of an approximately 32-acre property located at 16977 Healdsburg Avenue (APNs 091-060-009; -019; -022; -025): Senior Living Community with 221 independent living units (including 11 density bonus units), ancillary facilities (including dining facilities, meeting rooms, and administrative offices) and a total of 54 assisted living and memory care beds; 30 multi-family apartments; a 108-key hotel with a restaurant/bar, fitness facility and spa, meetings rooms and other amenities; and 45 multi-family units, five live-work units, and 12,000 square feet of commercial/retail space in a mixed use development. Backbone infrastructure includes the following: a new traffic signal on Healdsburg Avenue at the site entry; Healdsburg Avenue frontage improvements which include curbs, gutters, landscaping and lighting; two private streets including sidewalks, lighting, landscaping, and underground utilities; establishment of a secondary emergency vehicle access; extension of a segment of the Foss Creek Pathway; and establishment of Perimeter Trail (collectively, the “Project”).

B. In addition to the Development Agreement, the Project required, and received from the City, certain entitlements, including approval of a Conditional Use Permit, which was approved by the Planning Commission on February 11, 2020, pursuant to findings and subject to conditions of approval (“CUP Conditions”).

C. In addition, on August 20, 2020, pursuant to authority provided by Section 9.1 of the Development Agreement, the Assignor and Developer entered into a Partial Assignment of Rights and Assumption of Obligations Under Development Agreement which was recorded in the Official Records of Sonoma County on August 20, 2020, as Instrument No. 2020071885 (“Partial Assignment”).

D. Section 5.4 of the Development Agreement was assigned to the Developer under the Partial Assignment. This Section 5.4 calls for the development of thirty (30) units of Senior Living Community Affordable Housing within the Senior Living Community component of the Project,

8.A.b
Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: Ordinance-1st Amendment to North Village DA (Enso) (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) EXHIBIT 1
2 of 1
with twenty (20) units designated as Very Low Income, which were restricted to use by employees and volunteers of the Senior Living Community, and who qualified for the age restrictions of the RCFE license. An additional 10 Moderate income units were made available to the public, subject to local preference requirements defined in Development Agreement Section 5.3(a). To assist with the feasibility of this portion of the Project by aligning the income requirements in the Development Agreement with the actual incomes of the employees and volunteers of the Senior Living Community, Developer has requested and City has agreed to convert 5 Very Low Income Units to Moderate Income, and to convert an additional 5 Very Low Income units to Low Income.

E. On February 23, 2022, the Planning Commission, after a duly noticed public hearing, recommended approval of this Agreement and conditionally approved an Amendment to the Conditional Use Permit for the Project to address the requested change in affordability levels.

F. On ______________, after a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council introduced its Ordinance _________ approving this Agreement and authorizing its execution and adopted that Ordinance __________ on ____________. Ordinance ____________ became effective on _____________.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, with reference to the foregoing recitals and in consideration of the mutual promises, obligations and covenants contained herein, Parties consent to this First Amendment as follows:

1. This Agreement constitutes a Major Amendment to the Development Agreement for the Project in accordance with Section 6.4(b) of the Development Agreement.

2. Defined Terms. All capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings given in the Development Agreement, except as expressly otherwise defined herein.

3. Enumeration of Specific Deletions and Amendments. The Development Agreement is hereby revised to incorporate the following amendments. a. Sections 5.4(a) and 5.4(b) of the Development Agreement are amended and restated in their entirety as follows:

5.4(a) Developer shall cause construction of a minimum of thirty (30) units of Senior Living Community Affordable Housing within the Senior Living Community component of the Project, affordable to households with very low, low, and moderate incomes, as follows:
i. Ten (10) dwelling units shall be made available for occupancy at an affordable Monthly Housing Fee or rent, adjusted for household size, to Very Low Income Households.

8.A.b
Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: Ordinance-1st Amendment to North Village DA (Enso) (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) EXHIBIT 1
3 of 1
ii. Five (5) dwelling units shall be made available for occupancy at an affordable Monthly Housing Fee or rent, adjusted for household size, to Low Income Households.
iii. Fifteen (15) dwelling units shall be made available for occupancy at an affordable Monthly Housing Fee or rent, adjusted for household size, to Moderate Income Households.

5.4(b) Twenty units, comprised of the Senior Living Community Affordable Housing for Very Low, Low and five (5) of the Moderate Income Households shall be reserved for employees and volunteers of the Senior Living Community. The Senior Living Community Affordable Housing for the remaining ten (10) Moderate Income Households shall be subject to the local preference requirements described in Section 5.3(a) of this Agreement.

3. Interpretation. This Agreement shall be interpreted to give each of the provisions their plain and fair meaning. The Recitals set forth above are incorporated into this Agreement. The section headings used herein are solely for convenience and shall not be used to interpret this Agreement. The Parties acknowledge that this Agreement is the product of negotiation and compromise on the part of both Parties, and the Parties agree, that since all have participated in the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement, this Agreement shall not be construed as if prepared by one of the Parties, but rather according to its plain and fair meaning as a whole, as if all Parties had prepared it.

4. Integration. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to its subject matter and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding they may have had prior to the execution of this Agreement. This Agreement shall not be amended or modified except by a written agreement executed by each of the Parties.

5. Inconsistencies. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the provisions of this Agreement and the Development Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall control.

6. Severability. If any term, provision, condition or covenant of this Agreement or its application to any Party or circumstances shall be held by a court of competent jurisdiction, to any extent, invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of the term, provision, condition, or covenant to persons or circumstances other than those as to whom or which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected, and shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law unless the rights and obligations of the Parties have been materially altered or abridged thereby.

7. Status of Agreement. Except as modified by this Agreement, the terms and provisions of the Development Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

8.A.b
Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: Ordinance-1st Amendment to North Village DA (Enso) (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) EXHIBIT 1
4 of 1

8. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts by the Parties hereto and shall be the binding agreement of the Parties upon execution by each of them of one or more copies hereof.

9. Recording of Memorandum. Approximately concurrent with the Amendment’s effective date, the Parties shall execute, acknowledge and record a Memorandum of Agreement, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B, in the official records of Sonoma County.

10. Authority. Each of the persons signing this Agreement hereby represents and warrants that he or she is fully authorized to sign this Agreement on behalf of the Party for which he or she is signing.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have affixed their signatures to this Agreement as of the date and year indicated below and effective as of the date and year first above written.
[Signatures on Following Page]

8.A.b
Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: Ordinance-1st Amendment to North Village DA (Enso) (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) EXHIBIT 1
5 of 1
DEVELOPER:

KENDAL AT SONOMA, A ZEN

INSPIRED COMMUNITY
a California nonprofit public benefit
company
By: _____________________________

CITY:

CITY OF HEALDSBURG,
a California municipal corporation
By: _____________________________
Jeff Kay, City Manager
ATTEST:
________________________________
Raina Allan, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________
Samantha Zutler, City Attorney

8.A.b
Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: Ordinance-1st Amendment to North Village DA (Enso) (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) KENDAL DA Amdt v.1

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
The real property situated in the City of Healdsburg, County of Sonoma, State of California, described as follows:

8.A.b
Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: Ordinance-1st Amendment to North Village DA (Enso) (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) KENDAL DA Amdt v.1

EXHIBIT B

FORM OF MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City of Healdsburg
401 Grove Street
Healdsburg, CA 95448
Attention: City Clerk

EXEMPT FROM RECORDING FEES
PER GOVERNMENT CODE §27383

AND BUILDING HOMES & JOBS

TRUST FUND FEE PER

GOVERNMENT CODE
§27388.1(a)(2)(D)
Space above this line for Recorder’s use.

MEMORANDUM OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
This Memorandum of First Amendment to Development Agreement (this “Memorandum”), dated for reference purposes as of _________, 2022, is executed by and between the CITY OF HEALDSBURG, a California municipal corporation (“City”), and KENDAL AT SONOMA, A ZEN INSPIRED COMMUNITY, a California nonprofit public benefit company (“Developer”) and has been approved and agreed to by CCS HEALDSBURG, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignor”).

WHEREAS, City and Assignor have entered into a Development Agreement (the “Development Agreement”), the effective date of which is May 6, 2020, which was recorded in the Official Records of Sonoma County on June 1, 2020, as Instrument No. 2020041464. The Development Agreement pertains to the development of certain property (the “Property”) located in Healdsburg, California, as more particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto; and

8.A.b
Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: Ordinance-1st Amendment to North Village DA (Enso) (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) KENDAL DA Amdt v.1
WHEREAS, Assignor and Developer have entered into a Partial Assignment of Rights and Assumption of Obligations Under Development Agreement (the “Partial Assignment”) dated August 20, 2020, which was recorded in the Official Records of Sonoma County on August 21, 2020 as Instrument No. 2020071885; and
WHEREAS, City and Developer have entered into a First Amendment to Development Agreement (the “[First Amendment”), dated _______, 2022.

1. This Memorandum is solely to provide record notice of the First Amendment and in no way modifies the terms, conditions, provisions and covenants thereof. In the event of any inconsistency between this Memorandum and First Amendment, the First Amendment shall prevail.

The foregoing recitals are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. Each exhibit referred to herein is attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

2. The City and Developer agree that this Memorandum may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and said counterparts shall together constitute one and the same agreement, binding all of the parties hereto, notwithstanding all of the parties are not signatory to the original or the same counterparts.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Developer have caused this Memorandum to be executed as of the date first above written.

DEVELOPER:

KENDAL AT SONOMA, A ZEN INSPIRED

COMMUNITY
a California nonprofit public benefit company
By: _____________________________
, President
CITY:

CITY OF HEALDSBURG,
a California municipal corporation
By: _____________________________
Jeff Kay, City Manager
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Raina Allan, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________
Samantha Zutler, City Attorney

8.A.b
Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: Ordinance-1st Amendment to North Village DA (Enso) (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) KENDAL DA Amdt v.1

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California )
) ss
County of Sonoma )
On ,20__, before me,___________________________________________, (Name of Notary)
notary public, personally appeared _________________________________________________ who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
(Notary Signature)
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

8.A.b
Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: Ordinance-1st Amendment to North Village DA (Enso) (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) KENDAL DA Amdt v.1

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California )
) ss
County of Sonoma )
On ,20__, before me,___________________________________________, (Name of Notary)
notary public, personally appeared _________________________________________________ who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
(Notary Signature)
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

8.A.b
Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: Ordinance-1st Amendment to North Village DA (Enso) (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) KENDAL DA Amdt v.1

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
The real property situated in the City of Healdsburg, County of Sonoma, State of California, described as follows:

8.A.b
Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: Ordinance-1st Amendment to North Village DA (Enso) (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) 435 Allan Court
Healdsburg, Ca 95448
707.756.5036
enso.kendal.org
TO: Healdsburg City Council and City Staff
FROM:

Steve Bailey, Senior Vice President New Business and Development Kendal Corporation
1107 E. Baltimore Pike
Kennett Square, PA 19348
Susan O’Connell, Spiritual Director
San Francisco Zen Center
300 Page Street
San Francisco, Ca 94102
May 25, 2022
Below is our review of the basis of the understanding between Enso Village and the city of Healdsburg, which informed the negotiations for Affordable Housing in the DA for the North Village. It is followed by a proposal to create a more robust plan for marketing the 10 local preference Moderate Income units (MI) at Enso Village to Healdsburg residents as they become available in the future.

BASIC UNDERSTANDING
The Enso Village Project is not ‘housing’ in the normal sense of the term, and it is not ownership or rental. It is a contract that includes a range of services and benefits far beyond that normally included in a house price or rental agreement – assisted living, memory care, unique facilities, and access to other services (food, transportation, programming, etc.), and including nursing and end-of-life services. As such the pricing of this cannot be compared directly to the way in which housing affordability is determined (as a percentage of AMI).

The project is not subject to the City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (senior housing/assisted living is exempted). However, as part of the Development Agreement negotiated between Comstock and the City, the Project agreed to qualify the 20 units allocated to SFZC’s retired clergy as ‘very low income’ because at that time they were assumed to be predominately in this category from an AMI perspective, and also to provide 10 local preference units that would be affordable to moderate income households, recognizing that the pricing model includes more than just housing.

PROCESS TO DATE ON MARKETING 10 LOCAL PREFERENCE AFFORDABLE UNITS The Project made the effort described in the Affordable Housing Marketing Agreement to market the 10 local preference moderate units to Healdsburg residents. This effort included

8.A.c
Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: Plan for Local Preference for Moderate Income Units (05-25-22) (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading) 435 Allan Court
Healdsburg, Ca 95448
707.756.5036
enso.kendal.org
first calling everyone on the interest list who lived in Healdsburg and informing them of these units and then doing the same for residents who live in neighboring zip codes – plus daily advertising in the local paper.

All of the 10 moderate income units have been reserved by households in the 80 to 120 percent of AMI according to the understanding that exists between this project and the previous city council and staff that the value of the broader services available through the residency contract are factored in. The entrance fee varies depending on the type of unit and level of refundability specified in the contract; i.e. the higher entrance fees represent a contract where most of the entry fee is returned to a resident or heirs upon leaving the community.

PROPOSDED ADDITIONAL MARKETING EFFORTS FOR LOCAL PREFERENCE AFFORDABLE UNITS.

The Project is ‘sold out’ at this point and among those under contract, as of March 1, 2022, 17 are households currently living in Healdsburg. These households will sell their existing homes to new residents of Healdsburg, hopefully including working families.

In addition to the actions that are outlined in our agreed upon Affordable Housing Marketing Plan, starting when the community opens, we will include active outreach to the Senior population of Healdsburg by making 2 presentations a year at the Healdsburg Senior Center as well as advertise in the Senior Center Newsletter to support the best prospect of assembling a list of Healdsburg candidates. We will also advertise in the local paper once a year. Using this list of candidates will we create a waitlist for residents of Healdsburg for future openings.

As the units become available due to turnover, they will first be offered to Healdsburg seniors on the wait list.

We would also like to propose that the Healdsburg residents be given the option to tie the entrance fees for these units to the resident contracts for Enso Village that allow for zero percent return of the entrance fee upon moving out of the community. This will place those entrance fees at approx. 50% of the median home value for Sonoma.

We also propose creating a “scholarship” fund to help contribute to the cost of the entrance fees and monthly fees. This fund will have both a local preference and a BIPOC preference and will be administered by Enso Village. Enso Village agrees to seed this fund by contributing $50,000 a year for 10 years ($500,000), starting when the community reaches stabilization – approx. 2027. The “scholarship” fund will be made available for Enso Village residents to contribute to, so that they can also offer support for both local and diverse residents – meeting our value of having a diverse community.

8.A.c
Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: Plan for Local Preference for Moderate Income Units (05-25-22) (3664 : Enso DA Amendment 2nd Reading)

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: June 21, 2022
SUBJECT: Universal Basic Income
PREPARED BY: Malinalli Lopez, Public Info and Community Outreach Coordinator STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):

Provide Resident-Driven Community Services
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Adopt a Resolution approving a Professional Services Agreement with Corazón Healdsburg in the amount of $250,000 for the purpose of managing a Universal Basic Income program for 24 months.

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:

The Universal Basic Income program has been discussed at two previous City Council meetings, on September 7, 2021, and October 4, 2021, as a component of budget and funding discussions.

Corazón Healdsburg hosted a community panel discussion online on Thursday, February 17, 2022 titled “Community Conversation Guaranteed Basic Income,” co-hosted by the City of Healdsburg.

BACKGROUND:

Universal basic income (UBI) is a guaranteed payment provided on a regular basis to each program participant. It is also called guaranteed minimum income, or basic income.

The intent behind the payment is to provide enough to cover the basic costs of living and establish a level of financial security for recipients. In contrast to prescriptive public benefit programs that provide financial assistance for specific needs such as food, housing, or healthcare, guaranteed income is based on the principle that families understand best what they need and how to deploy limited resources to most effectively meet those needs.

The Healdsburg Universal Basic Income Program is proposed to function as a component of a larger Sonoma County effort. Consistent with past City Council direction, Corazón Healdsburg submitted a proposal to the City of Healdsburg to manage and implement the program with allocated funds to provide low-income residents in Healdsburg with financial support. The

8.B
Packet Pg. 430
proposed UBI Program will enroll 50 Healdsburg families to receive $600 per month for 24 months. Since the income is guaranteed, there are no conditions on how the money must be spent nor any related requirements including employment conditions. On October 4, 2021, there was Council consensus to move forward with the direct contracting of Corazón Healdsburg to administer the UBI Program and include an educational piece for the community.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

The City of Healdsburg has budgeted $250,000 for administration of the UBI Program and the proposal from Corazón is consistent with that amount. Corazón Healdsburg will be responsible for identifying the 50 families who will participate who are low-income and who have been impacted by the Covid-19 Pandemic. Corazón Healdsburg will manage the outreach of the program and provide program evaluation. Eligibility will be based on the following requirements, all of which will need to be met by participants. • Reside in the City of Healdsburg AND
• 18 years of age or older AND
• Have at least one dependent child (younger than 5) OR are pregnant AND • Have experienced economic and/or medical hardship related to COVID-19 AND • Income falls at or below 200% of the federal poverty line.

After the initial outreach period and closing of the application window, eligible participants will be selected via a random lottery The families who are selected to participate in the program will also be connected to many other services and resources in the community since Corazón Healdsburg will be partnering with other organizations to provide added resources.

If the contract is approved by the City Council, Corazón intends to begin marketing and outreach in late summer or early fall, with selection and onboarding to follow. First payments to families would likely be made this coming winter.

Corazón has also committed to conducting an evaluation of the program, in coordination with Sonoma County other participating cities, so that funders, nonprofits, and the community can assess the impacts and effectiveness of the program once it is completed.

ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:

The proposed action is an administrative activity which will not have an impact on the environment.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council could elect to not approve the PSA and direct staff to either modify the terms of the agreement or deploy the allocated funds in another manner.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The approved City budget for FY2021-22 includes $50,000 for this program. The approved budget for FY2022-23 includes the balance of $200,000 needed to fund the remainder of the program. No additional funding is required for this agreement.

8.B
Packet Pg. 431
The total cost of the program is estimated by Corazón to be $730,000. The balance of the required funding, after the City’s contribution will be provided by Corazón using its organizational funds and State and County grants. Corazón has not included its staff costs in the proposal, which would be provided as an in-kind contribution.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

Not applicable.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Resolution
PSA_UniversalBasicIncomeProgram_2022
EXHIBIT A UBI 2022

8.B
Packet Pg. 432

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

HEALDSBURG APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

AGREEMENT WITH CORAZON HEALDSBURG IN THE
AMOUNT OF $250,000FOR THE PURPOSE OF MANAGING A

UNIVERSAL BASIC INCOME PILOT PROGRAM
WHEREAS on October 4, 2021, the Healdsburg City Council approved to allocate City funds towards the Universal Basic Income (UBI) Program in the amount of $250,000; and WHEREAS the City of Healdsburg has designated Corazón Healdsburg to provide outreach, manage and implement the Universal Basic Income Program for a period of 24 months as well as identify the 50 families who will participate in the program; and WHEREAS the Guaranteed Basic Income Program is a type of cash transfer program that provides unrestricted cash transfers to individuals or households, and payments are delivered to qualifying and selected residents based on eligibility criteria; and WHEREAS residents who are selected for this program must reside in the City of Healdsburg, be 18 years of age, have at least one dependent child, or pregnant and have experienced economic, and or medical hardship related to COVID-19, and fall within the income limits of the federal poverty line and Corazón Healdsburg will be responsible for reviewing eligibility requirements; and
WHEREAS Corazón Healdsburg will further provide case management, outreach, additional services, and program evaluation; and
WHEREAS the purpose of this program is to invest in families and young children by providing an income floor that can offer economic stability and connect them to a social safety net recognizing that many families have been affected by the COVID-19 Pandemic and have experienced related economic and medical hardship, the selection criteria strive to balance the level of opportunity for low-income families by providing a financial resource for residents of the community of Healdsburg with the greatest need.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Healdsburg as follows:

1. The City Council approves the PSA and awards Corazón Healdsburg $250,000 to manage and administer the UBI Program for 24 months.

2. In making its findings, the City Council relied upon and hereby incorporates by reference staff reports, and other related materials and hereby incorporates the evidence and findings stated in the staff report related to this resolution as a basis for the adoption of this Resolution.

8.B.a
Packet Pg. 433 Attachment: Resolution (3655 : Universal Basic Income) Resolution No. -2022

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 21st day of June 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers: ( )
NOES: Councilmembers: ( )
ABSENT: Councilmembers: ( )
ABSTAINING: Councilmembers: ( )
SO ORDERED: ATTEST:

Osvaldo Jimenez, Mayor Raina Allan, City Clerk

8.B.a
Packet Pg. 434 Attachment: Resolution (3655 : Universal Basic Income) 1 CITY OF HEALDSBURG

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into this 21st day of June 2022, by and between the City of Healdsburg, a California Municipal Corporation, 401 Grove Street, Healdsburg, California, 95448, hereinafter referred to as "City," and Corazón Healdsburg referred to as the “Consultant.”

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City has determined that it requires the following professional services from Consultant:

Corazón Healdsburg to manage and implement a Guaranteed Basic Income Pilot Program and to provide an evaluation of the program upon completion; and
WHEREAS, the Consultant represents and warrants that it is fully qualified to perform such professional services by virtue of the specialized experience and training, education, and expertise of its principals and employees. The Consultant further represents that it is willing to accept responsibility for performing such services in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the legislative body of the City on July 21, 2022, by Resolution No. _______ authorized execution of this Agreement on behalf of the City in accordance with the City Municipal Code and/or other applicable law.

NOW, THEREFORE, City and Consultant, for the consideration hereinafter described, mutually agree as follows:

1. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES OR SCOPE OF WORK
The services to be performed under this Agreement (the “Services”) are as follows: the Consultant will manage, implement and evaluate the City of Healdsburg’s Universal Basic Income (UBI) Program. The Services are further described in the Consultant’s proposal (the “Proposal”), which is attached to and made a part of this Agreement as Exhibit A.

2. TERM
The Agreement term will commence on the date of execution and expire on June 30, 2024 unless the Agreement term is amended, or the Agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms.

3. PAYMENT TERMS AND NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT
A. City agrees to pay Consultant for Services that are performed in accordance with this Agreement. To be eligible for payment, Consultant invoices must be submitted not more often than monthly to City and list the Services performed and the amounts to be paid according to the cost categories and prices in the Proposal. Invoices from the Consultant shall be clearly marked with the Consultant’s name, project name, an itemized description of services rendered during the period covered by the invoice, and the City’s project account number, if applicable. Invoices shall also contain the total number of hours of work performed under the Agreement by the Consultant and each employee, agent, and subcontractor of the Consultant performing services hereunder. When the total number of hours of work by the Consultant and any individual employee, agent, or subcontractor of the Consultant reaches

8.B.b
Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: PSA_UniversalBasicIncomeProgram_2022 (3655 : Universal Basic Income) 2 or exceeds 800 hours, a separate notice shall be provided which shall include an estimate of the time necessary to complete the work described in Exhibit A.

B. In no event will the City’s obligation to pay the Consultant under this Agreement exceed $250,000, (the “Not to Exceed Amount”), unless this Agreement is first modified in accordance with its terms. Where the Proposal provides for compensation on a time and materials basis, the Consultant must maintain adequate records to permit inspection and audit of the Consultant's time and material charges under this Agreement. The Consultant will make such records available to City during normal business hours upon reasonable notice. In accordance with California Government Code Section 8546.7, if the Not to Exceed Amount exceeds TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($10,000.00), this Agreement and the Consultant’s books and records related to this Agreement shall be subject to the examination and audit of the State Auditor, at the request of City or as part of any audit of the City, for a period of three (3) years after final payment under the Agreement.

4. TIME OF COMPLETION
The Consultant must commence performance of the Services upon receipt of written direction to proceed from the City. Consultant shall devote such time to the performance of services pursuant to this Agreement as may be reasonably necessary to meet the standards of performance provided in Section 7 below and to satisfy Consultant’s obligations hereunder. The Consultant will complete the Services in accordance with this Agreement by June 30, 2024 (the “Time of Completion”). The Time of Completion may only be modified by an amendment of the Agreement in accordance with its terms.

5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
The Consultant and City agree that the Consultant will perform the Services as an independent contractor and not as an employee or agent of the City. The Consultant expressly warrants not to represent, at any time or in any manner, that Consultant is an employee of the City. Persons employed or utilized by Consultant in the performance of the Services will not be employees or agents of the City. The Consultant is solely responsible for the payment of employment taxes incurred under this Agreement and any similar federal or state taxes.

6. SUBCONTRACTING
The Consultant may subcontract portions of the Services upon the prior written approval of the City. The Consultant will be solely responsible for payment for such subcontract services. No contractual relationship will exist between any such subcontractors of the Consultant and the City.

7. STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE
A. The Consultant will perform the Services in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of the profession in which the Consultant is engaged in the geographical area in which the Consultant practices its profession and will prepare all work products required by this Agreement in accordance with those standards. The City shall not control or direct the manner in which Consultant’s services are to be performed. The Consultant will comply with all federal, state and local laws and regulations applicable to performance of the Services, including, but not limited to, the California Building Code, the Americans with Disabilities Act, any copyright, patent or trademark law, and any air pollution control law(s) or regulation(s). The Consultant’s failure to comply with any law(s) or regulation(s) applicable to the performance of the work hereunder shall constitute a breach of contract.

8.B.b
Packet Pg. 436 Attachment: PSA_UniversalBasicIncomeProgram_2022 (3655 : Universal Basic Income) 3 B. The Consultant shall assign only competent personnel to perform services pursuant to this agreement. In the event that the City, in its sole discretion, at any time during the term of this Agreement, desires the reassignment of any such persons, the Consultant shall, immediately upon receiving notice from the city of such desire of City, reassign such person or persons.

8. OTHER GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS
To the extent that this Agreement may be funded by fiscal assistance from another governmental entity, the Consultant and any subcontractors shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations to which the City is bound by the terms of such financial assistance program.

9. USE OF RECYCLED PRODUCTS
Consultant shall endeavor to prepare and submit all reports, written studies, and other printed material on recycled paper to the extent it is available at equal or less cost than virgin paper.

10. INDEMNITY
To the maximum extent permitted by law, Consultant shall, at its own expense, indemnify, defend with counsel acceptable to the City, (which acceptance will not be unreasonably withheld), and hold harmless City and its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers ("Indemnitees") from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, civil penalties and fines, expenses and costs (including, without limitation, claims expenses, attorney's fees, and costs and fees of litigation) (collectively, "Liability") of every nature, whether actual, alleged or threatened, arising out of or in connection with the Services or Consultant's failure to comply with any of the terms of this Agreement, regardless of any fault or alleged fault of the Indemnitees.

The Consultant's obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless under this provision shall not be excused because of the Consultant's inability to evaluate Liability, or because the Consultant evaluates Liability and determines that the Consultant is not or may not be liable. The Consultant must respond within 30 calendar days to any tender for defense and indemnity by the City unless the time for responding is extended by an authorized representative of the City in writing. If the Consultant fails to accept the tender of defense and indemnity within 30 calendar days, in addition to any other remedies authorized by law, so much of the money due or that may become due to the Consultant under this Agreement as shall reasonably be considered necessary by the City, may be retained by the City until disposition has been made of the matter subject to tender, or until the Consultant accepts the tender, whichever occurs first.

The Consultant waives any and all rights to express or implied indemnity against the Indemnitees concerning any Liability of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the Services or Consultant's failure to comply with any of the terms of this Agreement.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent this Agreement is a "construction contract" as defined by California Civil Code § 2783, as may be amended from time to time, the Consultant's duty to indemnify under this provision shall not apply when to do so would be prohibited by California Civil Code § 2782, as may be amended from time to time.

8.B.b
Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: PSA_UniversalBasicIncomeProgram_2022 (3655 : Universal Basic Income) 4 Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent that the Services include design professional services subject to Cal. Civil Code § 2782.8, as amended from time to time, Consultant's duty to indemnify shall only be to the maximum extent permitted by Civil Code § 2782.8.

In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City.

The defense and indemnification obligations of this Agreement are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement.

Consultant/Subcontractor's responsibility for such defense and indemnity obligations shall survive the termination or completion of this Agreement for the full period of time allowed by law.

11. INSURANCE
a. All required insurance must be provided in the form of “occurrence”-type policies underwritten by admitted insurers in the State of California with a rating of A or better from the current year Best Rating Guide. All policies must be issued at the expense of the Consultant and must be maintained at the Consultant’s expense throughout the performance of the Work. Consultant shall maintain insurance as required by this contract to the fullest amount allowed by law. The City may request a declaration page of the policy.
b. The limits of the Commercial General Liability (including bodily injury, personal injury and property damage) insurance shall be:
$2,000,000 per occurrence
$2,000,000 aggregate
c. If the work to be performed involves vehicles or vehicular equipment, the Automobile insurance limit shall be:
$1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage Automobile coverage should be at least as broad as Insurance Services Automobile Liability form CA 0001 Code 1 (“any auto”). No endorsement may be attached limiting the coverage.

Anything less than ‘any auto’ coverage must be approved by the Risk Manager prior to approval.

If the Risk Manager accepts anything less than ‘any auto’, additional information such as schedule of covered autos or proof of personal auto liability coverage, may be required by the City.
d. Worker’s Compensation Insurance. Proof of Workers Compensation and Employers Liability insurance as required by any applicable law, regulation or statute, including the provisions of Division IV of the Labor Code of the State of California, and any act or acts amending it.

Worker's compensation insurance must be for Statutory Limits and must cover the full liability of the Consultant. The Consultant’s Employer’s Liability Insurance must be in an amount no

8.B.b
Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: PSA_UniversalBasicIncomeProgram_2022 (3655 : Universal Basic Income) 5 less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence. The workers’ compensation policy must be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation. The insurance company, in its endorsement, must agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers for losses paid under the terms of such policy.
e. Umbrella/Excess Policy. The limits of insurance required under this Contract may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess Insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of the City (if agreed to in a written contract or agreement) before the City’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.
f. If applicable, the Consultant, at its own cost and expense, must maintain for the period covered by this Agreement professional liability insurance in an amount not less than TWO MILLION DOLLARS ($2,000,000) covering errors and omissions. Any deductible or self-insured retention under the required professional liability insurance may not exceed $150,000 per claim. g. The City’s Risk Manager may increase or decrease the insurance requirements and limits set forth in those cases in which he/she determines that special circumstances justify such an increase or decrease.
h. Both the General Liability and Auto endorsements must add the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers as an additional insured (“Additional Insured”). The Additional Insured coverage under the Consultant’s general liability policy shall be “primary and non-contributory” and the Consultant’s coverage will not seek contribution from the City’s insurance or self-insurance and shall be at least as broad as CG 20 01 04 13. i. It shall be a requirement under this Agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than or in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and/or limits shall be available to the Additional Insured. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named insured; whichever is greater.
j. The Consultant shall provide the City with a 30-day written notice of any reduction or cancellation of such insurance required to be furnished by the Consultant and include a severability of interest clause acceptable to the City and if requested by the City. k. If an Umbrella or Excess Policy is used to satisfy the requirements, an endorsement must be provided from the insurance carrier/broker and that Umbrella/Excess Policy ‘follows form’ or is ‘continuous’ to the General liability and/ Auto liability policy in addition to the required endorsement.
l. Examples of City approved insurance forms are included in this PSA package. If the Consultant’s insurance carrier chooses to use forms other than the City’s approved forms, such forms shall be subject to the approval of the City. If the Consultant provides policy pages instead of an endorsement the insurance agent/broker will be asked to sign, initial and date all applicable sections of the policy that meet the City’s insurance requirements. m. All self-insured retentions (SIR) must be disclosed to City for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability. Policies containing any self-insured retention (SIR) provision shall provide or

8.B.b
Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: PSA_UniversalBasicIncomeProgram_2022 (3655 : Universal Basic Income) 6 be endorsed to provide that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or the City. The City reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements.

Failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of right exercise later. n. Subcontractors
i. Consultant agrees to include with all subcontractors in their subcontract the same requirements and provisions of this contract including the indemnity and insurance requirements to the extent they apply to the scope of the Subcontractor’s work. The Consultant shall require all sub-contractors to provide a valid certificate of insurance and the required endorsements included in the Contract prior to commencement of any work and the Consultant will provide proof of compliance, upon request, to the City. ii. Any Subcontractor hired by the Consultant agrees to be bound to the Consultant and the City in the same manner and to the same extent as the Consultant is bound to the City under the Contract. The subcontractor further agrees to include the same requirements and provisions of this Contract, including the indemnity and insurance requirements, with any Subcontractor to the extent they apply to the scope of the Subcontractor's work. A copy of the contractual indemnity and insurance provisions will be furnished to the Subcontractor upon request

12. NON-DISCRIMINATION
During the performance of this Agreement, the Consultant will not discriminate against any employee of the Consultant or applicant for employment because of race, religion, creed, color, national origin, age, physical or mental handicap or disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, or sexual orientation. The Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, religion, creed, color, national origin, age, physical or mental handicap or disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, or sexual orientation.

13. LICENSES AND PERMITS
A. BUSINESS LICENSE
Before the City will issue a notice to proceed with the Services, to the extent the business license requirements of the Healdsburg Municipal Code apply, the Consultant and any subcontractors subject to the requirements must acquire at their sole expense a business license from City in accordance with the Code. Such licenses must be kept valid throughout the Agreement term.

B. OTHER LICENSES AND PERMITS
Consultant represents and warrants to the City that it has an established trade, occupation, or business in the same nature of services Consultant is performing under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant and its employees, agents, and any subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications, and approvals of whatsoever nature that are legally required to practice in their respective professions. Consultant expressly represents and warrants to City that Consultant and its employees, agents, and any subcontractors shall, at their sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals that are legally required to practice their respective professions.

14. OWNERSHIP OF WORK PRODUCTS AND TREATMENT OF DOCUMENTS

8.B.b
Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: PSA_UniversalBasicIncomeProgram_2022 (3655 : Universal Basic Income) 7 All plans, specifications, reports, designs, and other documents prepared by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be and remain the property of the City. Any modification or reuse of such documents by the City without the Consultant's prior written consent will be at the City’s sole risk.

Except as may be otherwise required by law, the Consultant will disclose no data, plans, specifications, reports or other documents pertaining to the Services without the prior written consent of the City.

15. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
If any dispute arises between the parties that cannot be settled after engaging in good faith negotiations, City and Consultant agree to resolve the dispute in accordance with the following:

A. Each party shall designate a senior management or executive level representative to negotiate any dispute.

B. The representatives shall attempt, through good faith negotiations, to resolve the dispute by any means within their authority.

C. If the issue remains unresolved after ten (10) days of good faith negotiations, the parties shall attempt to resolve the disagreement by negotiation between legal counsel. If the above process fails, the parties shall resolve any remaining disputes through mediation to expedite the resolution of the dispute.

D. The mediation process shall provide for the selection within 15 days of both parties of a disinterested third person as a mediator, shall be commenced within 30 day and shall be concluded within 15 days from the commencement of the mediation.

E. The parties shall equally bear the costs of any third party in any alternative dispute resolution process.

F. The alternative dispute resolution process is a material condition to this Agreement and must be exhausted as an administrative remedy prior to either Party initiating legal action. This alternative dispute resolution process is not intended to, nor shall be construed to, change the time periods for filing claims or action specified by Government Code section 900, et seq.

16. TERMINATION AND REMEDIES
A. City may terminate this Agreement for convenience by giving at least 10-days written notice to the Consultant specifying the termination effective date. Upon receipt of such notice, the Consultant may continue the performance of the Services through the date of termination. The City shall pay Consultant for all Services performed in accordance with this Agreement through the termination effective date. City, however, may condition payment of such compensation upon Consultant delivering to City any and all documents provided to or prepared by Consultant, and any and all documents provided to or prepared by City for Consultant, in connection with this Agreement. Such material may consist of photographs, computer software, video, and audio tapes, and other materials.

B. If Consultant materially breaches any term of this Agreement, in addition to any other remedies the City may have at law or equity, the City may:

1. Terminate the Agreement by notice to the Consultant specifying the termination effective date;

8.B.b
Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: PSA_UniversalBasicIncomeProgram_2022 (3655 : Universal Basic Income) 8 2. Retain, and/or recover from the Consultant at no additional cost to the City, the plans, specifications, drawings, reports, and other design documents and work products prepared by the Consultant, whether or not completed;

3. Complete the unfinished Services itself or have the unfinished Services completed, and/or;

4. Charge the Consultant or deduct from monies that may be due or become due the Consultant under this Agreement, the difference between the cost of completing the unfinished Services pursuant to this Agreement and the amount that would otherwise be due Consultant had Consultant completed the Services in accordance with this Agreement.

17. BINDING EFFECT AND ASSIGNMENT PROHIBITION
This Agreement is binding upon City, Consultant, and their successors. Except as otherwise provided herein, neither City nor Consultant may assign, sublet or transfer its interest in this Agreement or any part thereof without the prior written consent of the other, and any purported assignment without such consent will be void.

18. REPRESENTATIVES
A. City representative for purposes of this Agreement will be Jeff Kay, City Manager. The Consultant representative for purposes of this Agreement will be Glaydon de Freitas. The parties' designated representative will be the primary contact person regarding the performance of the Services.

The parties intend that their designated representatives will cooperate in all matters regarding this Agreement and in such a manner so as to achieve the performance of the Services in a timely and expeditious fashion. The Consultant shall not substitute or replace the primary representative without the approval of the City.

B. Notices:

Any written notice to Consultant shall be sent to:

Corazón Healdsburg
Glaydon de Freitas
PO Box 1004 Healdsburg, CA 95448
Any written notice to City shall be sent to:

Jeff Kay,
City Manager
City of Healdsburg
401 Grove Street
Healdsburg, CA 95448

19. INTEGRATION AND AMENDMENT
This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between City and Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, whether written or oral. If a

8.B.b
Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: PSA_UniversalBasicIncomeProgram_2022 (3655 : Universal Basic Income) 9 discrepancy, disagreement, ambiguity, inconsistency, or difference in interpretation of terms arises as to terms or provisions of this Agreement and any Exhibit(s) attached to this Agreement, this Agreement shall control and shall be deemed to reflect the intent of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. This Agreement may only be amended by a writing signed by a representative authorized to bind the Consultant and a representative authorized to bind the City.

20. CONFLICT OF INTEREST PROHIBITION
City and Consultant will comply with the requirements of the City’s Conflict of Interest Code adopted pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 87300 and following, the Political Reform Act (California Government Code Section 81000 and following), the regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission (Title 2, Section 18110 and following of the California Code of Regulations), California Government Code Section 1090 and following, and any other ethics laws applicable to the performance of the Services and/or this Agreement. The Consultant may be required to file with the City Clerk a completed Form 700 before commencing the performance of the Services unless the City Clerk determines that completion of Form 700 is not required, pursuant to the City’s Conflict of Interest Code. Form 700 forms are available from the City Clerk.

The Consultant may not perform Services for any other person or entity that, pursuant to any applicable law or regulation, would result in a conflict of interest or would otherwise be prohibited with respect to the Consultant’s obligations pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with the City and to provide any necessary and appropriate information requested by the City or any authorized representative concerning potential conflicts of interest or prohibitions concerning the Consultant’s obligations pursuant to this Agreement.

The Consultant may not employ any City official, officer or employee in the performance of the Services, nor may any official, officer or employee of the City have any financial interest in this Agreement that would violate California Government Code Section 1090 and following. Consultant hereby warrants that it is not now, nor has it been in the previous twelve (12) months, an employee, agent, appointee, or official of the City. If Consultant was an employee, agent, appointee, or official of the City in the previous twelve months, Consultant warrants that it did not participate in any manner in the forming of this Agreement. Consultant understands that, if this Agreement is made in violation of Government Code Section 1090 and following, the entire Agreement is void and Consultant will not be entitled to any compensation for Consultant’s performance of the Services, including reimbursement of expenses, and Consultant will be required to reimburse the City for any sums paid to the Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant understands that, in addition to the foregoing, penalties for violating Government Code Section 1090 may include criminal prosecution and disqualification from holding public office in the State of California.

Any violation by the Consultant of the requirements of this provision will constitute a material breach of this Agreement, and the City reserves all its rights and remedies at law and equity concerning any such violations.

21. APPLICABLE LAW AND VENUE
The laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and the interpretation of this Agreement. Any action or proceeding that is initiated or undertaken to enforce or interpret any provision, performance, obligation or covenant set forth in this Agreement shall be brought in a state court in Sonoma County.

8.B.b
Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: PSA_UniversalBasicIncomeProgram_2022 (3655 : Universal Basic Income) 10 22. RECOVERY OF ATTORNEY’S FEES
If a party to this Agreement brings any action, including an action for declaratory relief, to enforce or interpret any term of this Agreement, the prevailing party will be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled. The court may set such fees in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose.

23. SEVERABILITY
If a court of competent jurisdiction finds or rules that any provision of this Agreement is invalid, void, or unenforceable, the provisions of this Agreement not so adjudged will remain in full force and effect.

The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of any other provision of this Agreement.

24. COUNTERPARTS
This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one agreement.

City CONSULTANT
By: ________________________________ By: ______________________________ Jeffrey Kay, City Manager
By: _______________________________
Andrew J. Sturmfels, Administrative Services Director/
Risk Manager
ATTEST:

By: ________________________________
Raina Allan, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: ________________________________
Samantha W. Zutler, City Attorney
Exhibits: Exhibit A – Consultant’s Proposal

8.B.b
Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: PSA_UniversalBasicIncomeProgram_2022 (3655 : Universal Basic Income)

EXHIBIT A

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HEALDSBURG AND CORAZÓN HEALDSBURG
Scope of Services. The Contractor shall perform the following scope of services under the terms of the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Healdsburg and Corazón Healdsburg between July 21, 2022, and June 30, 2024:

A. Administration of PSA. Corazón staff will manage and implement a Universal Basic Income (UBI) Program. The program will allocate funds to provide 50 Healdsburg families with basic income support. The income of $600.00 per family will be distributed monthly for 24 months. As the income is guaranteed there are no conditions for how the monthly funds should be spent.

B. Purpose and Program Objectives. The purpose of the Universal Basic Income Program is to support very low-income families who have young children and who are at or below 80% of the area’s median income. Families who live at or below the indicated area median income also need assistance because of the hardships of the COVID-19 Pandemic. The program objectives are as follows:

1. Provide outreach for the program as needed as well as the program application process to identify 50 families residing in the City limits of Healdsburg who meet or are below the area median income. Participants who apply to the program must be at least 18 years of age and must have at least one dependent child (younger than 5) or are pregnant and who have experienced financial hardship during the Covid-19 pandemic.

2. Collaborate with area partners to connect families to the many services and resources available in supporting them to achieve financial stability.

3. Perform an impact evaluation to measure the efficacy of basic income in alleviating poverty and improving the quality of life of the identified families.

C. Selection Process. Once the application process closes, eligible applicants will be placed into a randomized lottery to select the 50 families. The 50 selected families will be contacted by Corazón Healdsburg to complete a brief form to verify program requirements.

The 50 verified households will be notified of their approval and receive instructions on how to enroll in the program.

D. Payment and Disbursement. Corazón Healdsburg will make various options available to the participating families which could include direct bank transfers, Venmo, and prepaid debit cards. Corazón Healdsburg will make analytics available for reporting purposes in the program evaluation.

E. Additional Services. Corazón Financial services will be made available to the participating families who may voluntarily choose to participate and access them. The services are not a requirement of the program, yet Corazón may choose to offer some or all of the following: family-centered coaching to establish goals ranging from finances, career, parenting, education, health, and well-being. Corazón Healdsburg may leverage its partnerships to offer financial literacy and computer skills education.

8.B.c
Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: EXHIBIT A UBI 2022 (3655 : Universal Basic Income) F. Targeted Outreach. Corazón Healdsburg will provide all of the necessary outreach for the success of the program to include postcards mailed out to City residents, email blasts, radio segments, and announcements, printed digital flyers, social media posts, and partnerships with local non-profits to expand awareness of the program.

G. Program Evaluation. Corazón will provide a mid-program report at the 1-year mark and a final evaluation that will include key findings and participant stories from the program.

Both reports will be presented to the Healdsburg City Council.

H. Hold Harmless Fund
Total cost of services: $250,000

8.B.c
Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: EXHIBIT A UBI 2022 (3655 : Universal Basic Income)

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: June 21, 2022
SUBJECT: Discuss Park Naming Policy
PREPARED BY: Mark Themig, Community Services Director
STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):

Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities
Provide Effective Governance
Provide Resident-Driven Community Services
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Review and discuss park naming policy options and provide direction to staff.

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:

None up to this point.

BACKGROUND:

On September 20, 2021, the City Council voted to place on a future agenda a discussion on the existing City Park naming policy. This agenda item is intended to introduce the topic of park naming policy and receive direction from City Council.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

The Healdsburg City Council adopted a park naming policy in 2002 to create a uniform way to name existing and future park and/or recreation facilities (attached). The policy’s objectives are to:

1. Ensure that naming/memorializing of public parks and recreation facilities will enhance the values and heritage of the City of Healdsburg and will be compatible with community interests.

2. Name public parks or recreation facilities so that they will be easily identified as to geographical location and/or function.

3. Encourage the dedication of land or funds for public use by individuals and groups, and provide recognition of their achievements or community contributions.

8.C
Packet Pg. 447
Implementation of the policy includes the following components:
• The City Council has final authority in naming all public parks and recreation facilities within its jurisdiction.
• No park site or recreation facility will be named for a living person, unless the site or facility has been donated by an individual, or a substantial donation has been made by an individual or organization to acquire a park site or recreation facility. • When appropriate, a park or recreation facility can be named in honor of a person, posthumously, when such person has made major contributions to the community, the country, or the field of recreation and parks.
• Historical names may be considered when the name is appropriate to the site.

Additional elements of the City’s current policy include:
• When a park site or recreation facility is carrying out a particular theme, that theme may be considered for the park or recreation facility name.
• Markers such a plaques, signs, etc. for the sole purpose of memorializing are not to be permitted in City parks or recreational facilities. The policy does allow naming items within a park (tree, park furniture, meadow, room, etc.) in recognition of donated funds. • The criteria for naming includes service recognition or monetary/material contribution. • The policy gives the City’s Parks and Recreation Commission the role of soliciting naming ideas and making a recommendation to City Council.

Based on review of records, it appears that there have been two relatively recent park naming processes using this policy: (1) naming Barbieri Brothers Park in the Parkland Farms Development (2002-2003) and (2) naming the grandstands at Recreation Park the “Clarence Ruonavaara Grandstands” (2010). (Attached)
City Council is asked to provide direction to staff on:

1. What considerations Council would like to have addressed in proposed revisions to the City’s park naming policy?

2. What process Council would like staff to implement to develop proposed policy updates (e.g. community engagement, role of the Parks and Recreation Commission, etc.)?

3. Any other considerations.

ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:

Not applicable.

ALTERNATIVES:

Do not update the City’s park naming policy. The existing park naming policy would continue to be used.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact anticipated with updating the City’s park naming policy other than staff time and associated operational costs.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

Pursuant to Title 14, the California Code of Regulations, Section 15378(b)(4)(5) of the

8.C
Packet Pg. 448
California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) guidelines, the proposed action is an administrative activity of the City that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment; and therefore, is not a project for purposes of CEQA.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Park Naming Policy
Barbieri Park Naming
Clarence Ruonavaara Grandstands Naming

8.C
Packet Pg. 449

8.C.a
Packet Pg. 450
Attachment: Park Naming Policy (3545 : Park Naming Policy)

8.C.a
Packet Pg. 451
Attachment: Park Naming Policy (3545 : Park Naming Policy)

8.C.a
Packet Pg. 452
Attachment: Park Naming Policy (3545 : Park Naming Policy)

8.C.a
Packet Pg. 453
Attachment: Park Naming Policy (3545 : Park Naming Policy)

8.C.b
Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: Barbieri Park Naming (3545 : Park Naming Policy)

8.C.b
Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: Barbieri Park Naming (3545 : Park Naming Policy) City Council Meeting Minutes
September 3, 2002