Healdsburg City Council
August 21, 2023

August 2023
d. The 2007 EIR analyzed the potential for buildout of the Saggio Hills Project to result in inadequate emergency access. As noted within the 2007 EIR, public roadways and intersections serving the project site would operate acceptably, and, therefore, would not present obstacles to emergency access. In addition, the fire substation proposed as part of the Saggio Hills Project would improve response times to the area. Furthermore, the Parkland Farms Boulevard extension would provide a secondary access route for the existing Parkland Farms neighborhood from Healdsburg Avenue. However, several of the proposed residences include long driveways that serve one or more homes, and fire apparatus would not be able to serve the private driveways without adequate turnaround facilities. Therefore, the 2007 EIR provided Mitigation Measure 3.12-12, which would require a hammerhead turnaround be provided at the terminus of any driveway longer than 150 feet. With implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.12-12, the EIR concluded a less-than-significant impact would occur. Given that the proposed park project does not include the construction of any residential driveways, Mitigation Measure 3.12-12 is not applicable to the proposed park project.

The Transportation Memorandum prepared for the proposed park project by Fehr & Peers included an analysis of project-specific emergency access impacts.17 As discussed therein, factors such as number of access points, roadway width, and proximity to fire stations determine whether a project provides sufficient emergency access. The fire substation proposed as part of the Saggio Hills Project has not yet been constructed; therefore, the closest fire station to the project site is located approximately 2.25 miles to the southwest of the project site at 601 Healdsburg Avenue. The fire substation is slated for completion in mid-2024.

The site plan prepared for the proposed park project notes multiple access points for emergency vehicles with full vehicle access to the site. In the case of an emergency evacuation out of the area, visitors to the park would have three exit options, depending on where their vehicles are parked. The access points include Passalacqua Road to the north, Healdsburg Avenue to the east, and Saddle Draw to the south. The internal circulator roadway between Passalacqua Road and Saddle Draw would have remotecontrol bollards which would prevent general vehicle cut-through travel; however, in the case of an emergency, the remote-control bollards would be lowered, allowing for an additional evacuation route. From the local roads, the nearby Highway 101 provides access to evacuation centers. Emergency evacuation of the project’s users would not substantially interfere with the evacuation of residents in nearby neighborhoods. Thus, the Transportation Memorandum concluded that the proposed park project would not result in emergency access impacts.

Based on the above information, the currently proposed park project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts beyond what were analyzed in the 2007 EIR. Thus, the proposed park project is consistent with the conclusions of the 2007 EIR.

Prior Mitigation Measures
None Required.
17 Fehr & Peers. Memorandum – CEQA Transportation Assessment for the Montage Development Park in Northern Healdsburg, California. June 8, 2023.

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) Saggio Hills Park Project
Initial Study/Addendum

August 2023
Previously Completed Mitigation Measures
The following mitigation measure(s) from the 2007 EIR have previously been completed and, therefore, are not required to be implemented further as part of the proposed park project. • Mitigation Measure 3.12-1: Pay Impact Fees for Signalization of the Dry Creek Road/U.S. 101 Interchange.
• Mitigation Measure 3.12-6: Install Bicycle Lanes on Healdsburg Avenue. • Mitigation Measure 3.12-7: Provide a Transit Stop on Healdsburg Avenue. • Mitigation Measure 3.12-10: Restrict Landscaping on the West Side of Healdsburg Avenue Near Passalacqua Road to Ensure Adequate Sight Distance. • Mitigation Measure 3.12-11: Prepare Sight Distance Analyses for Intersections within the Project Site.

New Mitigation Measures
None Required.

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) Saggio Hills Park Project
Initial Study/Addendum

August 2023
XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL
RESOURCES.

Would the project cause a substantial
adverse change in the significance of a
tribal cultural resource, defined in Public
Resources Code section 21074 as either
a site, feature, place, cultural landscape
that is geographically defined in terms of
the size and scope of the landscape,
sacred place, or object with cultural
value to a California Native American
Tribe, and that is:

Where Impact
Was Analyzed in
Previous CEQA
Document(s)?
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
a. Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in Public
Resources Code section 5020.1(k).

Pgs. 3.4-10
to 3.4-14 No No No
b. A resource determined by the lead
agency, in its discretion and supported
by substantial evidence, to be
significant pursuant to criteria set forth
in subdivision (c) of Public Resources
Code Section 5024.1. In applying the
criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of
Public Resources Code Section 5024.1,
the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a
California Native American tribe.

Pgs. 3.4-10
to 3.4-14 No No No
Discussion
a,b. Because Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines did not previously include a specific section on tribal cultural resources, the 2007 EIR did not include a specific analysis of the Saggio Hills Project’s potential tribal cultural resource related impacts; however, as noted in the 2007 EIR, Healdsburg and the surrounding vicinity are known to contain numerous traces of past human activity, including early Native American sites and artifacts. Therefore, the issue was still considered in the evaluation of the Saggio Hills Project within the Cultural Resources chapter of the 2007 EIR.

As discussed in Section V, Cultural Resources, of this Initial Study/Addendum, the 2007 EIR assessed the potential for buildout of the Saggio Hills Project to result in impacts to known and unknown cultural resources. The 2007 EIR determined that with implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.4-2, all impacts would be reduced to a less-thansignificant level. The 2007 EIR did not identify any surface-level archeological resources on or within the immediate vicinity of the Saggio Hills Project’s area of impact. However, the 2007 EIR concluded that construction activities could potentially disturb or destroy significant buried archaeological resources. Therefore, the 2007 EIR determined Mitigation Measure 3.4-2 would be required to mitigate all impacts to unknown archaeological resources to a less-than-significant level.

Furthermore, following analysis of the potential for buildout of the Saggio Hills Project to disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries, the

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) Saggio Hills Park Project
Initial Study/Addendum

August 2023
2007 EIR concluded a less-than-significant impact would occur with incorporation of Mitigation Measure 3.4-3. Similar to the analysis of impacts to archaeological resources, the 2007 EIR determined that while the Saggio Hills project site did not include any indication of the presence of human remains, burials, or cemeteries, human remains could potentially be discovered during ground-disturbing activities associated with construction of the Saggio Hills Project. Mitigation Measure 3.4-3 requires that all construction personnel be alerted to the possibility of buried human remains to be located on site, and in the event that human remains are discovered, further excavation or disturbance is prohibited pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the CHSC and that the specific protocol, guidelines, and channels of communication outlined by State statutes are followed.

Assembly Bill (AB) 52, passed in 2014, requires environmental review documents to disclose and analyze potential significant impacts to Tribal Cultural Resources, including sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe. Lead agencies are also required to begin consultation with California Native American tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed park project if the tribes request to the lead agency, in writing, to be informed by the lead agency of proposed park projects in that geographic area and the tribes request consultation, prior to determining whether a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or EIR is required for a project. AB 52 specifically applies to projects that have a Notice of Preparation or a Notice of Intent to adopt a negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration filed on or after July 1, 2015.

The City of Healdsburg certified the 2007 EIR prior to implementation of AB 52. Therefore, AB 52 is not applicable to the proposed park project.

The currently proposed park project’s area of impact is entirely within the previously analyzed footprint of the 2007 EIR. While the currently proposed park would be slightly larger as compared to the park analyzed within the 2007 EIR and 2010 DPR, the additional land included in the park parcel would remain as open space following development of the proposed park. In addition, portions of the project site including the active use portion of the proposed park, the proposed alignment of the multi-use trail, and the serpentine knoll, have been mass graded and, therefore, substantial disturbance has occurred within the project site. While the proposed park project would include additional grading activities associated with the proposed pump track, the proposed park project would be subject to Mitigation Measures 3.4-2 and 3.4-3, which would ensure any potential impacts to unknown tribal cultural resources would be mitigated to a less-than-significant level.

Based on the above information, the currently proposed park project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts than what were previously analyzed in the 2007 EIR. As a result, the proposed park project would remain consistent with the conclusions of the 2007 EIR.

Prior Mitigation Measures
The following mitigation measure(s) from the 2007 EIR would apply to the proposed park project:
• Mitigation Measure 3.4-2: Provide Preconstruction Worker Education and Stop Potentially Damaging Work If Cultural Resources are Uncovered. • Mitigation Measure 3.4-3: Provide Preconstruction Worker Education and Stop Potentially Damaging Work If Human Remains are Uncovered.

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) Saggio Hills Park Project
Initial Study/Addendum

August 2023
New Mitigation Measures
None Required.

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) Saggio Hills Park Project
Initial Study/Addendum

August 2023
XIX. UTILITIES AND
SERVICE SYSTEMS.

Would the project:

Where Impact
Was Analyzed in
Previous CEQA
Document(s)?
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
a. Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment, or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
Pgs. 3.13-
12 to 3.13-
15; and

3.13-17 to

3.13-20
No No No
b. Have sufficient water supplies available
to serve the project and reasonably
foreseeable future development during
normal, dry, and multiple dry years?
Pg. 3.13-11
to 3.13-12 No No No
c. Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider which
serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the
project’s projected demand in addition
to the provider’s existing commitments?
Pg. 3.13-15 No No No
d. Generate solid waste in excess of State
or local standards, or in excess of the
capacity of local infrastructure, or
otherwise impair the attainment of solid
waste reduction goals?
Pg. 3.13-16
to 3.13-17 No No No
e. Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes
and regulations related to solid waste?
Pg. 3.13-16
to 3.13-17 No No No
Discussion
a. The 2007 EIR assessed the potential for buildout of the Saggio Hills Project to result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment, or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects and concluded that impacts would be less than significant. According to the 2007 EIR, implementation of the Saggio Hills Project would require construction of on-site water conveyance facilities to deliver water from the City’s water distribution facilities to the project site. However, existing water distribution mains within the City are sized to accommodate all anticipated growth in the City’s north area, including the project site, and the City’s off-site water distribution facilities are adequate to deliver water to the project site. Therefore, the 2007 EIR concluded that impacts related to the relocation or construction of new or expanded water facilities would be less than significant.

With respect to wastewater, according to the 2007 EIR, implementation of the Saggio Hills Project would result in increased generation of wastewater and would require the construction of new on-site collection and conveyance facilities and the extension of existing off-site lines with available capacity. The 2007 EIR concluded that at 100 percent resort capacity, the Saggio Hills Project would generate approximately 65,500 gallons per day (gpd) of average dry-weather flow (ADWF) and 163,750 gpd of peak wet-weather flow (PWWF); at average resort capacity, the 2007 EIR determined that the Saggio Hills Project would generate approximately 52,025 gpd of ADWF, and 130,063 gpd of PWWF.

According to the 2007 EIR, the City of Healdsburg Public Works Department determined

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) Saggio Hills Park Project
Initial Study/Addendum

August 2023
that the City’s wastewater collection and conveyance facilities are adequate to serve wastewater generated by the entire Saggio Hills Project. Therefore, the 2007 EIR concluded the community park component of the Saggio Hills Project would not require or result in the construction of new wastewater facilities, or the expansion of existing wastewater facilities.

With respect to stormwater, approximately 63.9 percent of the currently proposed park project site would remain as natural open space, and additional portions of the site would be developed with pervious surfaces (i.e., grass sports fields, landscaping, etc.).

Nonetheless, the proposed park project would result in the development of new impervious surfaces on-site. As such, the proposed park project would include on-site stormwater facilities to provide storm water quality treatment and volume capture in accordance with the current Low Impact Development Technical Design Manual per the City's MS4 permit requirements, and peak management at pre-project levels for on-site runoff. As discussed previously, the proposed park project would include the reconnection of Foss Creek to the historical creek channel located within the project site. During oneto-two-year storm events, flows to the main stem or current channel would be unchanged.

However, a rain or flow event exceeding the one-to-two-year stream flow would flow into the bypass weir constructed as part of stream restoration, and the formal channel would act as an overflow/detention basin for relief during larger storm events. An existing stormwater detention facility is also currently located to the southwest of the project site, which would capture on-site runoff generated from new impervious surfaces on-site.

Consistent with State requirements, the on-site stormwater system would be sufficient to adequately handle the project’s stormwater runoff. As such, the proposed park project would not require major relocation or expansion of any stormwater infrastructure as adequate downstream stormwater capacity exists to serve the project.

Electric power would be provided to the project site by the City of Healdsburg, and telecommunications facilities would be provided by AT&T and Comcast. Under the City’s Electrification Reach code, all newly constructed buildings are required to be built allelectric, with the exception of cooking appliances (i.e., stoves) and decorative fireplaces.

Given that the proposed park project would not include the use of decorative fireplaces, and the proposed park project would include limited cooking appliances associated with the proposed concession stand, the proposed park project would involve the use of a minimal amount of natural gas. According to the 2007 EIR, buildout of the Saggio Hills Project would increase electrical demand in Healdsburg by a maximum of approximately 5,690 kilowatt-hours per day and an average of 4,134 kilowatt-hours per day. However, existing City electrical facilities are expected to meet future demand. In addition, the 2007 EIR concluded that increased demand for communications service and associated infrastructure would not be substantial, and impacts would be less than significant.

As discussed throughout this Initial Study/Addendum, the currently proposed park project would be constructed within the footprint of the previously analyzed Saggio Hills Project.

While the currently proposed park would be slightly larger as compared to the park analyzed within the 2007 EIR and 2010 DPR, the additional land included in the park parcel would remain as open space following development of the proposed park. The analysis of the 2007 EIR included an assessment of the Saggio Hills Project’s utilities needs at buildout. Based on the 2007 EIR analysis, the proposed park project would not require or result in the need for new or expanded water, wastewater treatment, or storm water drainage, electric power, or telecommunications facilities. Therefore, the currently proposed park project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) Saggio Hills Park Project
Initial Study/Addendum

August 2023
severe significant impacts beyond what were analyzed in the 2007 EIR. Thus, the proposed park project is consistent with the conclusions of the 2007 EIR. b. The 2007 EIR analyzed the Saggio Hills Project’s potential impacts on water supplies to determine if sufficient water supplies would be available to serve the Saggio Hills Project, and concluded buildout of the Saggio Hills Project would result in a less-than-significant impact. According to the 2007 EIR, a Water Supply Assessment (WSA) was prepared to evaluate the adequacy of existing and future water supplies to meet the water demand created by the proposed park project in conjunction with existing and future development in Healdsburg. As shown in Table 3.13-3 of the 2007 EIR, water demands for the community park component of the Saggio Hills Project were estimated to be approximately 1,400 gpd. The maximum total water demands for the Saggio Hills Project were projected to be 147,200 gpd and average total water demands were projected to be 133,585 gpd.

Based on the projected water demand, the WSA concluded that the City would have sufficient water supplies to serve the proposed park project’s maximum water demands while meeting the projected demands of existing customers and other anticipated future water demands within the city limits. Therefore, because the City would have sufficient water supplies to serve the proposed park project, the 2007 EIR concluded that the project’s water supply impacts would be less than significant.

The currently proposed park project would be constructed within the footprint of the previously analyzed community park component of the Saggio Hills Project. In addition, while the currently proposed park would be slightly larger as compared to the park analyzed within the 2007 EIR and 2010 DPR, the additional land included in the park parcel would remain as open space following development of the proposed park. Overall, the proposed park project would result in approximately 10 percent more open space, as compared to the previously anticipated park. Furthermore, while the proposed park uses would differ slightly as compared to what was included in the 2007 EIR (see Table 1), such differences are not anticipated to result in an increased water demand such that the conclusions of the 2007 EIR would be altered. Rather, the currently proposed park includes more synthetic turf fields than what was included in the 2007 EIR, which are anticipated to use less water than typical grass fields would. Furthermore, when additionally factoring in water-saving measures that would be implemented as part of the proposed park project, such as water-efficient fixtures, faucets, and devices and natural and native planting materials to minimize, if not eliminate, irrigation demand, a reasonable assumption can be made that water demand would be further reduced compared to what was analyzed in the 2007. The proposed park project would also be required to comply with the California Department of Water Resources’ Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) to reduce outdoor water use.

The City of Healdsburg’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan Update (UWMP) addresses vulnerabilities to the City's water supply due to climate change, including droughts, floods, and wildfires. In recent years, the City has seen curtailments of its water diversions in response to extended drought conditions. The City is planning for future curtailments by improving and adding water supply infrastructure, gaining new water rights, and educating the public about the need for water conservation to ease the negative impacts associated with future droughts. Local measures to address water supply limitations include requiring the use of drought-resistant landscaping and enforcing mandatory conservation requirements as dictated by the severity of water supply shortages.

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) Saggio Hills Park Project
Initial Study/Addendum

August 2023
The UWMP provides water supply and demand projections for periods of prolonged drought (5-years) and concludes that the level of conservation needed to address annual deficits ranges from less than 5 percent to roughly 12 percent. The UWMP establishes City protocols for assessing and determining water supply reliability on an annual basis to help forecast and calibrate shortage response actions. The proposed park project would be subject to demand reduction measures identified in the City's Water Shortage Contingency Plan that are implemented by the City in response to water shortages and emergencies.

The City is currently working to construct both aquifer storage and recovery wells and a municipal recycled water pipeline. The water supply projects would help to increase potable water supplies and would help ease the level of conservation required during periods of drought. However, future droughts would still require some level of water conservation. To build drought resiliency, the proposed park project would rely on meeting or exceeding efficient landscaping requirements and building code compliance for indoor water fixtures.

Based on the above information, the currently proposed park project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts beyond what were analyzed in the 2007 EIR. Thus, the proposed park project is consistent with the conclusions of the 2007 EIR.
c. The 2007 EIR analyzed the Saggio Hills Project’s potential impacts on wastewater capacity to determine if adequate capacity exists to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments, and concluded buildout of the Saggio Hills Project would result in a less-than-significant impact. As discussed above, the 2007 EIR concluded that at 100 percent resort capacity, the Saggio Hills Project would generate approximately 65,500 gpd of ADWF and 163,750 gpd of PWWF; at average resort capacity, the 2007 EIR determined that the Saggio Hills Project would generate approximately 52,025 gpd of ADWF, and 130,063 gpd of PWWF. According to the 2007 EIR, the City of Healdsburg Public Works Department determined that the City’s wastewater collection and conveyance facilities are adequate to serve wastewater generated by the entire Saggio Hills Project.

Collected wastewater flows from the project site would ultimately be transported to the City of Healdsburg wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) for treatment and disposal.

According to the 2007 EIR, the City’s existing WWTP had a permitted capacity of 1.4 million gallons per day (mgd) of ADWF, and the estimated ADWF at the time the 2007 EIR was drafted was approximately 1.0 mgd. Therefore, a remaining unused capacity of 0.4 mgd ADWF was available to accommodate development and growth within the City, which was determined to be adequate to serve the residential buildout estimated by the 1987 City General Plan (as amended through October 4, 2004). As noted in the 2007 EIR, at the time the EIR was drafted, the City of Healdsburg was in the process of upgrading the WWTP to tertiary standards. According to the EIR, project construction began in August 2006 and was expected to be completed by January 1, 2008. Since the 2007 EIR was drafted, upgrades to the WWTP were completed, and according to the City, the WWTP now has a maximum capacity of 4.0 mgd.18 Therefore, given that the 2007 EIR concluded a less than significant impact, and the capacity of the WWTP has been increased since 18 City of Healdsburg. City of Healdsburg Membrane Wastewater Treatment Facility. Available at:
https://www.ci.healdsburg.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/1039. Accessed June 2022.

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) Saggio Hills Park Project
Initial Study/Addendum

August 2023
the EIR was certified, adequate capacity exists to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments.

Based on the above information, the currently proposed park project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts beyond what were analyzed in the 2007 EIR. Thus, the proposed park project is consistent with the conclusions of the 2007 EIR.
d,e. The 2007 EIR analyzed the landfill capacity available to serve the Saggio Hills Project’s solid waste disposal needs and the project’s compliance with federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. The 2007 EIR concluded that operations of the Saggio Hills Project would result in a less-than-significant impact; however, short term construction waste generated by the Saggio Hills Project would be significant.

Therefore, Mitigation Measure 3.13-5 was included in the 2007 EIR to reduce construction waste impacts to a less-than-significant level. As detailed in the 2007 EIR, construction of the Saggio Hills Project would generate a substantial amount of short-term constructionrelated debris and solid waste that would be hauled to the Healdsburg Transfer Station and then transported to any of the four landfills available to the County. Disposal of recyclable materials generated during construction, such as soil, brush and other vegetative growth, dimensional lumber, metal scraps, and cardboard packaging, is prohibited at all County transfer stations; therefore, without the preparation and implementation of a Construction Recycling Plan, as required by Mitigation Measure 3.13- 5, impacts would be potentially significant. In addition, the CALGreen Code currently requires at least 65 percent diversion of construction waste for projects permitted after January 1, 2017.

Based on the California Integrated Waste Management Board’s (CIWMB’s) generation rates for Sonoma County, the 2007 EIR estimated that the maximum solid-waste generation from the Saggio Hills Project would be approximately 48.3 tons per day (TPD) and that average total solid waste generation would be 31.6 TPD. Solid waste collected from the project site would be hauled to the Healdsburg Transfer Station. The transfer station is permitted to accept 720 TPD of solid waste. As noted in the 2007 EIR, the estimated maximum of 48.3 TPD of solid waste and average 31.6 TPD of solid waste generated by the Saggio Hills Project would be approximately 0.1 percent and 0.05 percent, respectively, of the total 720 TPD currently being received. Therefore, the 2007 EIR concluded that the transfer station has sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate solid-waste disposal needs for the Saggio Hills Project.

From the transfer station, solid waste would be transported to any of the four landfills available to the County, and, according to the 2007 EIR, the landfills would have sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs. The project would also comply with all federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste reduction and recycling.

Based on the 2007 EIR’s analysis of buildout of the Saggio Hills Project, existing capacity at the Healdsburg Transfer Station and associated four landfills would accommodate the solid waste disposal and recycling needs of the Saggio Hills Project. In addition, the currently proposed park project would be constructed within the footprint of the previously analyzed community park component of the Saggio Hills Project. While the currently proposed park would be slightly larger as compared to the park analyzed within the 2007 EIR and 2010 DPR, the additional land included in the park parcel would remain as open

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) Saggio Hills Park Project
Initial Study/Addendum

August 2023
space following development of the proposed park. Furthermore, while the proposed park uses would differ slightly as compared to what was included in the 2007 EIR (see Table 1), such differences are not anticipated to result in increased solid waste disposal needs such that the conclusions of the 2007 EIR would be altered. Therefore, the currently proposed park project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts beyond what were analyzed in the 2007 EIR, and the proposed park project is consistent with the conclusions of the 2007 EIR.

Prior Mitigation Measures
The following mitigation measure(s) from the 2007 EIR would apply to the proposed park project:
• Mitigation Measure 3.13-5: Prepare and Implement a Construction Recycling Plan.

New Mitigation Measures
None Required.

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) Saggio Hills Park Project
Initial Study/Addendum

August 2023
XX. WILDFIRE.

If located in or near state responsibility
areas or lands classified as very high fire
hazard severity zones, would the project:

Where Impact
Was Analyzed in
Previous CEQA
Document(s)?
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
a. Substantially impair an adopted
emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
Pgs. 3.12-
32 to 3.12-
33 No No No
b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and
other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks,
and thereby expose project occupants
to, pollutant concentrations from a
wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a
wildfire?
Pg. 3.6-20 No No No
c. Require the installation or maintenance
of associated infrastructure (such as
roads, fuel breaks, emergency water
sources, power lines or other utilities)
that may exacerbate fire risk or that may
result in temporary or ongoing impacts
to the environment?
Pg. 3.6-20 No No No
d. Expose people or structures to
significant risks, including downslope or
downstream flooding or landslides, as a
result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
Pg. 3.6-20 No No No
Discussion
a-d. Wildfire is an environmental issue area included in CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, subsequent to the approval of the 2007 EIR. As such, the 2007 EIR did not include an analysis specifically dedicated to wildfire; however, the 2007 EIR analyzed the Saggio Hills Project’s potential impacts related to wildfires throughout various discussions. As discussed previously, the 2007 EIR assessed the potential for buildout of the Saggio Hills Project to impair implementation or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan within Chapter 3.12, Transportation and Circulation, of the EIR. As noted therein, public roadways and intersections serving the project site would operate acceptably, and, therefore, would not present obstacles to emergency access. In addition, the fire substation proposed as part of the Saggio Hills Project could improve response times to the area. Furthermore, the Parkland Farms Boulevard extension would provide a secondary access route for the existing Parkland Farms neighborhood from Healdsburg Avenue. However, several of the proposed residences in the Saggio Hills Project include long driveways that serve one or more homes, and fire apparatus would not be able to serve the private driveways without adequate turnaround facilities. Therefore, the 2007 EIR provided Mitigation Measure 3.12- 12, which would require a hammerhead turnaround be provided at the terminus of any driveway longer than 150 feet. With implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.12-12, the EIR concluded a less-than-significant impact would occur. Given that the proposed park project does not include the construction of any residential driveways, Mitigation Measure

3.12-12 is not applicable to the proposed park project.

In addition, as previously discussed in Section IX, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of this Initial Study/Addendum, the 2007 EIR analyzed the Saggio Hills Project’s potential to expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) Saggio Hills Park Project
Initial Study/Addendum

August 2023
fires. As noted therein, the project site is in an area designated as a High Fire Hazard Zone by the City, and designated by the CAL FIRE as a Very High FHSZ. However, since the 2007 EIR was drafted, CAL FIRE has released updated FHSZ maps. According to the most recent CAL FIRE data, the project site is located within a local responsibility area, and is not within a Very High FHSZ.19 Nonetheless, the 2007 EIR determined that implementation of the proposed park project would potentially expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss or injury involving wildland fires. However, according to the 2007 EIR, the project applicant would be required by law to incorporate California Building Code and California Fire Code requirements into all development phases. The California Fire Code, which has been adopted by the City as Chapter 15.08 of the Healdsburg Municipal Code, and is enforced by the City Fire Department, requires fire reduction measures for specific plan areas, including the project site. Fire reduction measures include fire sprinklers, fire resistant coatings, construction and maintenance of fuel breaks, management of fire-prone vegetation along streets, maintenance of clearances around structures, providing minimum street widths and turning radii, limiting the lengths of culde-sacs and dead-end streets, limiting excessive street grades, and requiring at least two access roads in and out of developed areas. As such, the 2007 EIR concluded that compliance with California Building Code regulations, California Fire Code requirements, and other state and local fire safety requirements would minimize wildland fire risks at the project site, and a less-than-significant impact would occur.

The currently proposed park project would be constructed within the footprint of the previously analyzed Saggio Hills Project. As discussed above, according to the most recent CAL FIRE data, the project site is located within a local responsibility area, and is not within a Very High FHSZ. In addition, the proposed park project would still be required to adhere to all standards included in the California Building Code and the California Fire Code, as noted above. Furthermore, due to past on-site grading activates, the project site does not include slopes, as the serpentine knoll identified on-site was leveled and buried, and the site is mostly void of vegetation. Therefore, visitors of the proposed park project would not be significantly exposed to risk of loss, injury or death involving wildfires.

Based on the above information, the currently proposed park project would not result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts beyond what were analyzed in the 2007 EIR. Thus, the proposed park project is consistent with the conclusions of the 2007 EIR.

Prior Mitigation Measures
None Required.

New Mitigation Measures
None Required.
19 CAL FIRE. FHSZ Viewer. Available at: https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/. Accessed June 2022.

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) Saggio Hills Park Project
Initial Study/Addendum

August 2023
XXI. MANDATORY

FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE.

Where Impact
Was Analyzed in
Previous CEQA
Document(s)?
Do Proposed
Changes Involve
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
Any New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
a. Does the project have the potential to
substantially degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to
drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory?
N/A No No No
b. Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable
future projects)?
N/A No No No
c. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
N/A No No No
Discussion
a. As discussed in Section IV, Biological Resources, of this Initial Study/Addendum, portions of the project site, including the active use portion of the proposed park, the proposed alignment of the multi-use trail, and the serpentine knoll, have been mass graded and, therefore, has been heavily disturbed in certain areas. As such, the project site would not include special-status plant species, based on the conclusion of the 2007 EIR. Through preconstruction and protocol-level surveys and any additional protective measures specified by Mitigation Measures 3.3-2 and 3.3-3, all potential adverse effects to such species would be minimized. Additionally, because the project site could contain unidentified historic or prehistoric resources beneath the ground surface, the proposed park project would be implemented in accordance with Mitigation Measures 3.4-2 and 3.4- 3, and impacts related to unidentified historic or prehistoric resources within the project site would be minimized during construction activities, consistent with the requirements of CEQA.

Considering the above, the proposed park project would not: 1) degrade the quality of the environment; 2) substantially reduce or impact the habitat of fish or wildlife species; 3) cause fish or wildlife populations to drop below self-sustaining levels; 4) threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community; 5) reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal; or 6) eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Impacts associated with such resources have been

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) Saggio Hills Park Project
Initial Study/Addendum

August 2023
adequately addressed and would not change from what was identified in the 2007 EIR, and the criteria for requiring further CEQA review are not met. b. The proposed park project was included in the future development assumptions evaluated in the 2007 EIR. As part of the cumulative analysis, the 2007 EIR included a total of 48 potential/approved projects in the City of Healdsburg, determined as having the potential to interact with buildout of the Saggio Hills Project to the extent that a significant cumulative effect might be expected to occur (see Table 4-1 of the 2007 EIR). The 2007 EIR concluded that cumulative impacts to aesthetics and air quality would be significant and unavoidable. For those impacts determined to be significant in an EIR, CEQA Section 15162 allows for future environmental documents to limit examination of environmental effects to substantial changes in a proposed park project that would require major revisions of the previous EIR to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.

The currently proposed park project would be constructed within the footprint of the previously analyzed community park component of the Saggio Hills Project. While the currently proposed park would be slightly larger as compared to the park analyzed within the 2007 EIR and 2010 DPR, the additional land included in the park parcel would remain as open space following development of the proposed park. In addition, as compared to what was analyzed in the 2007 EIR, the currently proposed park project would include the construction of an additional bridge within the project site, as well as additional creek restoration measures, including reconnection of Foss Creek to the historical creek channel. The proposed park uses would also differ slightly as compared to what was included in the 2007 EIR (see Table 1). However, as discussed throughout this Initial Study/Addendum, such differences are not anticipated to result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe significant impacts than were previously analyzed in the 2007 EIR, and further analysis is not required in this Initial Study/Addendum. c. As described in this Initial Study/Addendum, the proposed park project would not cause substantial effects to human beings, including effects related to exposure to air pollutants, geologic hazards, hazardous materials, and excessive noise, beyond those effects previously analyzed as part of the 2007 EIR. Therefore, further analysis is not required.

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval)

APPENDIX
A

TRANSPORTATION MEMORANDUM

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) 140 Keller Street | Petaluma, CA 94592 | (707) 582-0039 Memorandum
Date: June 8, 2023
To: Nick Pappani, Raney Planning and Management
From: Ian Barnes, PE and Cody Lim, Fehr & Peers
Subject: CEQA Transportation Assessment for the Montage Development Park in Northern Healdsburg, California
WC23-3982.00
This technical memorandum documents the results of the project consistency check and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) transportation analysis prepared for the proposed Montage Development Park project (project). The project was previously programmatically cleared though CEQA as part of the overall Saggio Hills Specific Plan (approved in the mid-2000s); the environmental document for the Specific Plan noted that the project analyzed in this memorandum would be required to go through a partial project-level CEQA review for project elements that could not be analyzed programmatically (e.g., the site plan for the project). The project is now proposing a different set of uses on site, as well as a different vehicle circulation pattern versus what was considered in the Specific Plan.

The primary purpose of this evaluation is to verify the project’s consistency with the previously completed EIR that analyzed CEQA impacts under the guise of Level of Service (LOS). This evaluation also provides a project-level CEQA review of the site plan as required by the previously completed EIR for the Specific Plan area.

Project Description
The project site is located southwest of the intersection of Healdsburg Avenue/Passalacqua Road in northern Healdsburg, California. The project site is bound by the existing residential development to the south and the planned Saggio Hills affordable housing site to the east, as shown on Figure 1 (all figures are provided at the end of the memorandum). The proposed project is comprised of a 37.26-acre park including 12 acres of developed area, 1.44 acres of roads/parking, and 23.82 acres of natural open space (versus the 38.64-acre park assumed in the Specific Plan that included 15.26 acres of developed area, 2.49 acres of roads, and 20.89 acres of natural open space). Vehicular access to the project site would be provided by a main driveway off Passalacqua Road. Secondary parking access would be provided off Healdsburg Avenue. A

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) Nick Pappani, Raney Planning and Management
June 8, 2023

third limited access point would be off Saddle Draw exclusively for pedestrians, bicyclists, and emergency vehicles. Access to this driveway would be controlled by removable bollards.

Trip Generation & Consistency with Specific Plan EIR
Trip generation refers to the process of estimating the amount of vehicular traffic a project would add to the surrounding roadway system. Estimates are created for the peak one-hour periods during the weekday morning and evening commute hours when traffic volumes on adjacent streets are typically at their highest and when the project is expected to generate a substantial amount of traffic.

Project trip generation was estimated using rates from the data found in the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. The ITE Trip Generation Manual is a published guide regarding trip generation rates for various land uses. Trip generation literature produced by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) served as the basis for the trip generation estimates used in the analysis of circulation system LOS that formed the basis of the CEQA Transportation and Traffic section analysis for the Specific Plan EIR. At the time of the previously-completed EIR, the Trip Generation Manual (7th Edition) did not have available data for the public park land use, hence why the SANDAG data was likely used instead. Given that the current version of the Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition) contains data for the public park land use, it was used for the trip generation since it represents the most current set of nationallypublished trip generation data for reflecting the uses of the project.

Because the level of a project’s impact to the operations of the circulation system is proportional to the number of vehicles added to the circulation system, a comparison between trip generation of the proposed project versus the trip generation of the project under the Specific Plan EIR yields a determination of consistency or non-consistency with the LOS analysis in the Specific Plan EIR.

The trip generation for the proposed project under the Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition (i.e., using the latest nationally-published trip generation data) was compared to the project trip generation conducted as part of the previously-completed EIR. It is noted that if the SANDAG trip generation data were applied to current project description, the effects of the proposed project on the City’s circulation system would not be substantively different compared to the results in the Specific Plan EIR analysis. The results of this assessment are presented in Table 1.

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) Nick Pappani, Raney Planning and Management
June 8, 2023

Table 1: Project Trip Generation Comparison
Land Use Quantity Units ITE
Code
Typical Weekday Vehicle Trips
Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Proposed Project Trip Generation
Public Park1 37.26 Acres 411 113 1 0 1 3 2 5
Specific Plan EIR Trip Generation
Community Park2 37 Acres - 740 24 6 30 24 35 59
Proposed Project Trip Generation – Specific Plan EIR Trip Generation Delta -627 -23 -6 -29 -21 -33 -54
Notes:

1. ITE land use category 411 – Public Park - (PH Adj Streets, 7-9A, 4-6P):

Weekday Daily: T = 0.64(X)+88.46
Weekday AM Peak Hour: T = 0.02(X); Enter = 59%; Exit = 41% Weekday PM Peak Hour: T = 0.11(X); Enter = 55%; Exit = 45% Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, 2021

2. SANDAG literature trip generation data – Community Park:

Weekday Daily: T = 20(X)
Weekday AM Peak Hour: T = 0.8X); Enter = 80%; Exit = 20% Weekday PM Peak Hour: T = 1.6(X); Enter = 41%; Exit = 59% Source: San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), 1995, Whitlock and Weinberger Transportation; Table 3.12-3, Saggio Hills Revised EIR, 2008
Analysis Source: Fehr & Peers, 2023
The comparison of the trip generation for the currently proposed project versus the previous analysis indicates that the currently proposed project would generate fewer trips than estimated in the Specific Plan EIR. Since the trip generation for the currently proposed project is lower than the trip generation used in the previously-completed Specific Plan EIR, the currently proposed project is consistent with the previously-completed environmental analysis.

As noted previously, if the SANDAG community park trip generation rates are used to assess the currently proposed project, the trip generation under the currently proposed project would not be substantively different compared to the project trip generation under the previouslycompleted Specific Plan EIR. The differences in project weekday peak hour trip generation (between the Specific Plan EIR project description and the current project description) are within the realm of rounding (i.e., the difference in trip generation is within one trip). Because the effects of a project on the circulation system are linearly related to the trips generated, there would not be a substantive difference in the current project’s effect on the circulation system versus the project as described in the Specific Plan EIR.

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) Nick Pappani, Raney Planning and Management
June 8, 2023

CEQA Transportation Analysis Methods
For CEQA Transportation analysis, projects are generally required to respond to the following CEQA Guidelines Appendix G checklist questions:

Would the project:
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities? b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
Criterion B is the formal implementation of the Senate Bill (SB) 743 requirement to analyze VMT as part of the CEQA Transportation section. Because the current proposed project is tiering off the previously-completed EIR for the Specific Plan, a VMT analysis has not been prepared. It is noted that VMT for public facilities is typically completed on the basis of total VMT generated; because the proposed project would generate fewer trips than the project as envisioned in the Specific Plan, the project as currently proposed would likely generate less VMT than under the project description in the Specific Plan.

CEQA Transportation impact significance criteria for Criteria A, C and D are provided in the following section.

CEQA Transportation Impact Criteria
CEQA impacts are identified based on the project’s VMT per capita and its effects to the pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of travel; as noted previously, a VMT assessment has not been completed as the project is consistent with a previously-completed EIR for the Specific Plan area. The Specific Plan EIR noted that project-level CEQA Transportation impacts should be studied prior to project approval; the project-level CEQA Transportation impact criteria for nonVMT-related impacts are summarized below.

Public Transit System
The project would create a significant impact related to public transit service if either of the following criteria are met:

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) Nick Pappani, Raney Planning and Management
June 8, 2023

• The project generates a substantial increase in public transit riders that cannot be adequately served by existing public transit services; or, • The project conflicts with existing or planned public transit facilities.

Pedestrian System
The project would create a significant impact related to the pedestrian system if any of the following criteria are met:
• The project design would not provide or would eliminate pedestrian facilities to connect to the area circulation system, or
• The project design would create hazardous conditions for pedestrians due to geometric design feature or introduction of incompatible uses, or • The project conflicts with existing or planned pedestrian facilities.

Bicycle System
The project would create a significant impact related to the bicycle system if any of the following criteria are met:
• The project design would not provide or would eliminate bicycle facilities that connect to the area circulation system; or
• The project design would create hazardous conditions for bicyclists due to geometric design feature or introduction of incompatible uses; or • The project conflicts with existing or planned bicycle facilities.

Vehicle System Hazard Impacts
The project would create a significant impact related to the vehicle system if any of the following criteria are met:
• The project design would substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature, or
• The project introduces incompatible vehicle uses to the system.

Emergency Access
The project would create a significant impact related to emergency vehicle access if the following criterion is met:

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) Nick Pappani, Raney Planning and Management
June 8, 2023

• The project incorporates design features that limit or result in inadequate emergency vehicle access.

Multimodal CEQA Impacts
This following section evaluates the project’s potential impacts on multimodal transportation under Existing with Project Conditions.

Public Transit
The project site is served by Sonoma County Transit (SCT), which provides fixed-route transit service within the City of Healdsburg. Additionally, paratransit service is also available for those who are unable to independently use the transit system due to medical or other conditions. The nearest existing public transit stop is located about 0.25 miles away from the project site at Bridle Path and Equestrian Way, which is served by the SCT Route 67 Healdsburg Shuttle. The existing transit system is expected to accommodate project-generated demand for transit services. The project is not expected to conflict with existing or planned transit facilities. Therefore, impacts to transit are less-than-significant.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Systems
The proposed project is expected to include the following pedestrian and bicycle improvements on and off-site:
• A 10-foot wide public bicycle and pedestrian asphalt trail with centerline striping totaling 3,225 linear feet in length. This trail would connect to the existing Class II bike lanes on Healdsburg Avenue west of the project and on Parkland Farms Boulevard southeast of the project. The trail would also provide access to the existing Parkland Farms Neighborhood to the south and links to off-site recreation areas (Fox Pond Healdsburg Ridge and County Open Spaces).
• Wayfinding and interpretive signage to guide pedestrians and bicyclists along the multiuse trail. • Three pedestrian/bike creek crossings and one vehicular/bike/pedestrian creek crossing.

These connections would support connectivity and align with the City of Healdsburg Pedestrian & Bicycle Master Plan. The project would not conflict with pedestrian facilities, nor preclude future facilities. Therefore, impacts to pedestrian and bicycle systems are less-than-significant.

CEQA Vehicle System Hazard Impacts
Vehicular site access is proposed on the north side of the project at a main driveway on Passalacqua Road, a local road with an assumed (prima facie) speed limit of 25 miles-per-hour.

This assumption is based on the geometrics of the facility. Secondary access to the site will be

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) Nick Pappani, Raney Planning and Management
June 8, 2023

provided to the east at the proposed fire station site driveway off Healdsburg Avenue, a 40-milesper-hour local roadway. Restricted access (through the installation of bollards) to the project internal circulator road will be provided to the south at Saddle Draw, a local 25 miles-per-hour roadway.

On roadways, stopping sight distance is a critical factor that ensures that drivers have enough time and space to stop to avoid hazards.

According to Table 201.1 of the Caltrans Highway Design Manual, the stopping sight distance at 25 miles-per-hour is 150 feet and at 40 miles-per-hour increases to 300 feet. The sight distance at the driveways along the 25-miles-per-hour roads appear to be more than 150 feet and more than 300 feet along the 45-miles-per-hour road, indicating that the stopping sight distance should be adequate. It is strongly recommended that the final site improvement plan be reviewed for potential sight distance impediments including any new signs, above ground utility boxes, or landscaping proposed in the sight triangle.

Overall, the project does not introduce incompatible uses to the roadway system, nor would it introduce geometric features that would result in hazardous conditions. Thus, the project’s impact to the vehicle system is less-than-significant. The preceding finding is related to the project’s interface with the public roadway system and the project’s effect on hazards to the public roadway system; site design recommendations are presented later in this memorandum.

CEQA Emergency Access Impacts
Factors such as number of access points, roadway width, and proximity to fire stations determine whether a project provides sufficient emergency access. The closest fire station to the project site is located approximately 2.25 miles to the southwest of the project site at 601 Healdsburg Avenue. A new fire substation is also being proposed adjacent to the west side of the project site.

The site plan notes multiple access points for emergency vehicles with full vehicle access to the site. In the case of an emergency evacuation out of the area, visitors to the park will have three exit options, depending on where their vehicles are parked. These access points include Passalacqua Road to the north, Healdsburg Avenue to the east, and Saddle Draw to the south. As discussed further in this memo, the internal circulator roadway between Passalacqua Road and Saddle Draw will have remote-control bollards preventing general vehicle cut-through travel but allow for remote lowering in evacuation scenarios. From these local roads, the nearby US 101 freeway provides access to evacuation centers. Emergency evacuation of the project’s users should not substantially interfere with the evacuation of residents in nearby neighborhoods.

The proposed on-site roadway design provides adequate emergency vehicle circulation and sufficient clearance to accommodate likely emergency vehicle movements. Provided the design of

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) Nick Pappani, Raney Planning and Management
June 8, 2023

the on-site circulation system adequately accommodates emergency vehicle access and circulation, the project’s impacts to emergency vehicles are less-than-significant.

Internal Site Plan Review
Vehicle Circulation within the Site
Primary vehicle access to the site is provided at the main project driveway on Passalacqua Road.

This driveway provides entrance and exit access to the main 40-space parking lot. From this parking lot, drivers can connect to an 80-space overflow parking area along the project internal circulator road. Restricted access to this circulator road from the Parkland Farms neighborhood to the south will be provided at Saddle Draw. Use of this circulator road will be controlled by removable remote-control bollards that should reduce neighborhood cut-through traffic. Access to an additional 37-space parking lot is located off Healdsburg Avenue next to the new proposed fire station. A turnaround area for vehicles should be added at the south end of the 80-space overflow parking lot. This will provide vehicles with space to turnaround and not get stuck at the end of the project circulator road at the restricted access Saddle Draw driveway.

For special events it could be useful to allow vehicular access at the Saddle Draw driveway. These special events should be coordinated with the City through a permit process, including developing a traffic management plan if the planners of the special event desire the full use of the Saddle Draw driveway. A traffic management plan should help to maintain a manageable traffic flow through the Parkland Farms neighborhood during special events. The traffic management plan may include but not necessarily be limited to: temporary stop signs at the Saddle Draw driveway, stationing of City staff to facilitate event traffic in/out of the Saddle Draw driveway, advanced resident notification of the special event, opening and closing times of full Saddle Draw driveway access.

Aside from the recommended turnaround area, the proposed driveways and parking lots provide ample space for vehicles to properly maneuver within the site. However, a formal analysis of vehicle turning movements within the site should be completed once the project site is fully designed.

Public Parking Layout and Capacity
Parking is required for the new proposed park by the City of Healdsburg Land Use Code Chapter

20.16.150. Since the chapter does not specify parking requirements for a community park, ITE Parking Generation Manual 5th Edition was referenced to develop parking requirement estimates.

The ITE Parking Generation Manual is a published guide regarding parking generation rates for various land uses. The previous EIR analysis referenced the ITE Parking Generation Manual 3rd Edition and collected local data for its parking requirement estimates. Table 2 below summarizes the ITE Parking Generation Manual parking compared to the Project’s proposed parking.

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) Nick Pappani, Raney Planning and Management
June 8, 2023

Table 2: City of Healdsburg Parking Requirements
Land Use Unit Type Unit Count
Parking Required by
ITE Parking
Generation Manual
(spaces)1
Parking Supply
Provided (spaces)
Public Park1 Acres 36 44 157
Notes:

1. ITE Land Use category 411- Public Park –
Sunday: P=1.21X
Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition, 2019 Analysis Source: Fehr & Peers, 2023
The proposed site plan includes parking supply that exceeds the parking requirements. In addition, the City of Healdsburg worked with local sports permit groups to develop a plan for staggering start times to allow a break for vehicles to exit before new vehicles arrive. The City will require permit groups to stagger start times for games and practices. This will assist in controlling peak parking demand at the park. Although the parking supply looks to be adequate for the parking demand of the park, it is recommended that the City monitor parking usage and develop event parking plans for larger scale planned events (e.g. a soccer tournament).

Site Plan Recommendations
The following recommendations have been developed to enhance multimodal site access and internal circulation. The site plan recommendations are summarized on Figure 2:

Site Recommendation 1: The final site plan for the project should be analyzed by the Project’s Civil Engineer to ensure that adequate sight distance is maintained at the project driveways and internal intersections. No objects (landscaping, monument signs, etc.) should be allowed within the sight distance triangles at the project driveway and internal intersections.

Site Recommendation 2: Upon completion of the final designed site plan, the project Civil Engineer should complete a turning movement analysis for City of Healdsburg emergency vehicles to ensure adequate emergency vehicle circulation and access throughout the project site.

Site Recommendation 3: Stripe a hi-visibility crosswalk at the proposed intersection crossing at Passalacqua Road/Montage Way. A raised crosswalk can also be considered to reduce vehicle speeds along Passalacqua Road. Recommended additional treatment is a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB).

Site Recommendation 4: Consider moving the multi-use trail near the main project driveway closer to the intersection of Passalacqua Road/Main Project Driveway. This should help to facilitate a safer crossing for bikes and pedestrians from the far side of Passalacqua Road. Striping of a high-visibility crosswalk at this road crossing is recommended. The additional treatments of a raised crosswalk and RRFB should be considered at this location as well.

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) Nick Pappani, Raney Planning and Management
June 8, 2023

Site Recommendation 5: Stripe hi-visibility crosswalks at the two bicycle/pedestrian trail crossings on the project internal circulator road that provides access to the main 40 stall parking lot and overflow 80 stall parking lot.

Site Recommendation 6: Add a turnaround area for vehicles at the south end of the internal circulator roadway to turn around and exit via the main project driveway.

Site Recommendation 7: Install remote-control bollards at the Saddle Draw driveway to allow for selective access at interface with Parkland Farms neighborhood (i.e., bikes/peds/emergency vehicles only).

Conclusion
Results of the assessment indicate that all project CEQA Transportation impacts are less-thansignificant, and no mitigation is required; additionally the project as currently proposed is consistent (for CEQA purposes) with the previously adopted Specific Plan for the area. Several recommendations have been developed to improve the site plan with respect to multimodal access, circulation, and safety. The final site plan should be reviewed by a licensed engineer prior to construction to ensure safe and efficient multimodal circulation on site.

This completes our CEQA Transportation assessment for the proposed Montage Development Park in the City of Healdsburg. Please call Cody Lim at (707) 582-0039 with any questions.

Attachments
Figure 1 Project Vicinity
Figure 2 Site Plan Recommendations

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) Barbieri
Brothers
Park
Lytton
Lake
Healdsburg
Ridge OSP

HEALDSBURG
Chiquita
Simi
Healdsburg Ave
Alexander Valley Rd
Dry Creek Rd
March Ave
Healdsburg Ave
Grove St
Chiquita Rd
Parkland Farms Blvd
Passalacqua Rd
Montage Way
3101
3101
Project Site Vicinity
Figure 1
Project Site

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan Approval) WĂƌŬZĞĐƌĞĂƟŽŶ>ĞŐĞŶĚ
Key
A
A
F
F
F
G
G
G
G
H
H
I
l
K
K
J
J
B
B
C
C
C
D
D
E
E
E
E1
E1
Program Features/Usage Area
ĐƟǀĞhƐĞZĞĐƌĞĂƟŽŶƌĞĂ
ZŝƉĂƌŝĂŶŽŶĞ
sĞŚŝĐƵůĂƌŝƌĐƵůĂƟŽŶ
īŽƌĚĂďůĞ
,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ^ŝƚĞ
;DZ͕,ZͿ
īŽƌĚĂďůĞ
,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ^ŝƚĞ
;DZ͕,ZͿ
dƌĂŝůŽŶŶĞĐƌƟŽŶ
ƚŽ,ĞĂůĚƐďƵƌŐ
ZŝĚŐĞZĞŐŝŽŶĂů
KƉĞŶ^ƉĂĐĞ
WƵŵƉ^ƚĂƟŽŶ
ZŽĂĚ
to
ZĞƐŽƌƚ
^ƚŽƌŵtĂƚĞƌ
ĞƚĞŶƟŽŶ
&ĂĐŝůŝƚLJ
ĂƌďŝĞƌŝ
Brothers
Park
WĂƌŬůĂŶĚ&ĂƌŵƐ
EĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚ
dƌĂŝůŽŶŶĞĐƟŽŶƚŽ
^ĂŐŐŝŽ,ŝůůƐ
dƌĂŝů>ŽŽƉ
<ĞLJŽŶĐĞƉƚƐ͗
ͻ ĐƟǀĞƌĞĐƌĞĂƟŽŶĂƌĞĂƐĐŽŶĐĞŶƚƌĂƚĞĚŶŽƌƚŚŽĨĐƌĞĞŬ
ĐůŽƐĞƌƚŽĂƌƚĞƌŝĂůƌŽĂĚƐ
ͻWĂƌŬƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐĂŶĚƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĚŝƐƚƌŝďƵƚĞĚĞǀĞŶůLJƚŚƌŽƵŐŚ
ƉĂƌŬ͕ƐĞƌǀŝĐŝŶŐŵƵůƟƉůĞƵƐĞƌƐ
ͻƌĞĞŬƌĞƐƚŽƌĂƟŽŶĂŶĚĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚŵƵůƟͲƵƐĞƚƌĂŝůĂƌĞĂŬĞLJ ĨĞĂƚƵƌĞŽĨƉĂƌŬĚĞƐŝŐŶ͕ĐŽŶŶĞĐƟŶŐƚŽĐŽƵŶƚLJŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƐ , >^hZ's
Eh

W^^>YhZK
&K^^Z

<
ŝĐLJĐůĞͬWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶdƌĂŝů
ƌŝĚŐĞ
WƌŝŵĂƌLJ
ŶƚƌĂŶĐĞƐ
ZĞƐƚƌŽŽŵ;ϮƚŽƚĂůͿ
WŝĐŶŝĐ^ŚĞůƚĞƌ;ϭϬϬͲƉĞƌƐŽŶĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJͿ
dƌĂŝůŚĞĂĚ^ƚĂŐŝŶŐƌĞĂĂŶĚ<ŝŽƐŬĨŽƌ
ZĞŐŝŽŶĂůdƌĂŝůŽŶŶĞĐƟŽŶƐ
>ĞŐĞŶĚ
WĂƌŬ^ŝƚĞŽŶĐĞƉƚ&Ͳ&ŝŶĂůDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶ
WĂƌŬŝŶŐƌĞĂƐ
&ŝƌĞ^ƚĂƟŽŶ^ŝƚĞ
ZĞƐŽƌƚDĂŝŶƚĂŝŶĞĚsŝŶĞLJĂƌĚ
ĂƌďŝĞƌŝWĂƌŬ/ŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ;&ƵƚƵƌĞWŚĂƐĞŽĨtŽƌŬͿ
ĐƟǀĞhƐĞZĞĐƌĞĂƟŽŶƌĞĂͲĂLJhƐĞ;hŶůŝƚͿ
WĂƐƐŝǀĞhƐĞZĞĐƌĞĂƟŽŶƌĞĂ
dƌĂŝůEĞƚǁŽƌŬ

džŝƐƟŶŐtĞƚůĂŶĚƐͲWƌĞƐĞƌǀĞĚͲϭ͘ϲϵĐƌĞƐ
tĞƚůĂŶĚDŝƟŐĂƟŽŶƌĞĂ
• DƵůƟͲhƐĞdƌĂŝů
• DƵůƟͲhƐĞdƌĂŝůƌŽƐƐŝŶŐƐ;ϮƚŽƚĂůͿ
• ;ϭͿƌŽƐƐŝŶŐĂƚdƌĂŝů͕ŽĂƌĚǁĂůŬͲůŝŬĞŽŶWŝĞƌƐƐƉĂŶŶŝŶŐŽǀĞƌƌĞĞŬ,ĂďŝƚĂƚ • ;ϭͿsĞŚŝĐƵůĂƌƌŝĚŐĞƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ
• >ŝŶŬĂŐĞƐƚŽKīͲƐŝƚĞZĞĐƌĞĂƟŽŶƌĞĂƐ;&ŽdžWŽŶĚ,ĞĂůĚƐďƵƌŐZŝĚŐĞĂŶĚ ŽƵŶƚLJKƉĞŶ^ƉĂĐĞƐͿ
• ^ĐĞŶŝĐKǀĞƌůŽŽŬƐ
• KīͲůĞĂƐŚŽŐƌĞĂ
• &ŝůůƌĞĂͲϬ͘ϲϯĐƌĞƐ
• tĞƚůĂŶĚĂƐŝŶƐͲϭ͘ϬϳĐƌĞƐ
• tĞƚůĂŶĚhƉůĂŶĚƐͬtĂƚĞƌƐŚĞĚƵīĞƌƌĞĂͲϰ͘ϲĐƌĞƐ;EĞƚͿ • ĂƐŬĞƚďĂůůŽƵƌƚ;ϭͿ
• dĞŶŶŝƐŽƵƌƚ;ϭͿ
• WŝĐŬůĞďĂůůŽƵƌƚƐ;ϮͿ
• WŝĐŶŝĐWĂǀŝůŝŽŶ;^ŚĞůƚĞƌʹϭϬϬͲƉĞƌƐŽŶĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJ͕ĂƉƉƌŽdž͘ϯ͕ϬϬϬƐƋ͘Ō͘Ϳ͕ĨŽƌ ^ƉĞĐŝĂů
ǀĞŶƚƐ
• KƉĞŶͲŝƌWĞƌĨŽƌŵĂŶĐĞƌĞĂ;ϭ͕ϬϬϬƐƋ͘Ĩƚ͘Ϳ
• ^ŚĂĚĞĚWůĂLJƌĞĂƐ;ϮƚŽƚĂů͕ĨŽƌĂŐĞƐϬͲϲĂŶĚϲͲϭϮƌĞƐƉĞĐƚŝǀĞůLJͿ • WĂƐƐŝǀĞKƉĞŶ^ƉĂĐĞƐ͗WŽůůŝŶĂƚŽƌ'ĂƌĚĞŶƐ͕ŝƌĚ,ĂďŝƚĂƚ͕KƉĞŶ>ŽǁͲtĂƚĞƌ hƐĞ>ĂǁŶ͕DĞĂĚŽǁƐ͕KƌĐŚĂƌĚƐ
• ;ϯͿ>ŽƚƐǁŝƚŚdŽƚĂůĂƉĂĐŝƚLJϭϱϬĂƌƐнͬͲƚŽƚĂů͕ƐĞĞƉůĂŶĨŽƌƋƵĂŶƟƚLJďLJůŽĐĂƟŽŶ • ^ĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐ͕
ŶƚƌLJĞƐŝŐŶ
•
•
hƉĚĂƚĞƐƚŽZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ^ƉĂĐĞƐ

džƉĂŶĚĞĚWůĂLJƌĞĂ
EĞǁZĞƐƚƌŽŽŵƵŝůĚŝŶŐ
WƵŵƉdƌĂĐŬͲϮϱ͕ϬϬϬƐƋ͘Ĩƚ͘

Ϯ

Ϯ
tĞƚůĂŶĚDŝƟŐĂƟŽŶƌĞĂŝŶĞƚĞŶƟŽŶĂƐŝŶ
• tĞƚůĂŶĚĂƐŝŶƐͲϬ͘ϵϮĐƌĞƐ
• tĞƚůĂŶĚhƉůĂŶĚƐͬtĂƚĞƌƐŚĞĚƵīĞƌƌĞĂͲϮ͘ϬĐƌĞƐ;EĞƚͿ • ĂƐĞďĂůů&ŝĞůĚƐ;>ŝƚͿʹƐLJŶƚŚĞƟĐƚƵƌĨŝŶĮĞůĚƐ͕ŶĂƚƵƌĂůŐƌĂƐƐŽƵƞŝĞůĚƐ • &ůĞdžŝďůĞKƵƞŝĞůĚĨŽƌ^ŽĐĐĞƌhƐĞ
• ĚũĂĐĞŶƚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗
• ŽŶĐĞƐƐŝŽŶƐͬ^ƚŽƌĂŐĞͬZĞƐƚƌŽŽŵ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ;Ϯ͕ϱϬϬ^&Ϳ
• ůĞĂĐŚĞƌ^ĞĂƟŶŐ
• ^ŚĂĚĞĚWůĂLJŐƌŽƵŶĚ;ŐĞƐϬͲϲͿ
• Dog Play Area
• WŝĐŶŝĐƌĞĂƐ;ƵŶĐŽǀĞƌĞĚƚĂďůĞƐ͕ƉůĂĐĞĚĂƌŽƵŶĚĞdžŝƐƟŶŐƚƌĞĞƐͿ ϯϳ^d>>^
80 STALLS
ϰϬ
^d>>^
•
Consider moving trail crossing closer
to intersection for the safety of bikes/
pedestrians crossing from the far side
of Passalacqua Road. Recommend
installing a high-visibility crosswalk
with a Rectangular Rapid-Flashing
Beacon (RRFB).

Install remote control bollards to
allow for selective access at interface
with neighborhood (i.e., bikes/peds/
emergency vehicles only)
Recommend installing a high-visibility
crosswalk with a Rectangular
Rapid-Flashing Beacon (RRFB)
Recommend installing
high-visibility crosswalks at
connector road trail crossings
Add turnaround
area for vehicles
Site Plan Recommendations
Figure 2
Source: Park Site Concept F – Final Master Plan

6.C.b
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: CEQA Addendum (4059 : Saggio Hills Park CEQA Addendum and Final Master Plan HEALDSBURG PARKS DESIGN + RIVER ACCESS | CITY OF HEALDSBURG COMMUNITY SERVICES | FLETCHER STUDIO

PROPOSED MASTER PLAN

SAGGIO HILLS DEVELOPMENT PARK

SPORTS FIELDS
(NORTH OF THE CREEK)

COMMUNITY PARK
(SOUTH OF THE CREEK)

BARBIERI PARK INTEGRATION

TRAILS NETWORK

OFF-LEASH DOG PLAY AREA

STORMWATER FEATURES

CREEK RESTORATION

WETLANDS

NATURAL RESOURCE

MANAGEMENT AND FIRE

FUELS REDUCTION

6.C.c
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Saggio Hills Final Park Master Plan (4059 :

HEALDSBURG PARKS DESIGN + RIVER ACCESS | CITY OF HEALDSBURG COMMUNITY SERVICES | FLETCHER STUDIO

SPORTS FIELDS

PLAY AREAS

PICNIC ISLAND

PROMENADES

PARKING
RESTROOMS + CONCESSIONS

DOG PLAY AREA

HIKING TRAILS

SPORTS COURTS

PUMP TRACK

COMMUNITY GARDEN

OAK GROVE

OPEN LAWN

SPECIAL USE GARDENS

PICNIC PAVILION

BANDSHELL

MULTI-USE TRAIL

POSSIBLE ART
12345789
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 12
2 4
5 5
6 7
8 9
9 10
11 13
2 14
15 *
12 2
6 136
4 *
*
*
*
*
*
*
3 16
8 17
17 17
17 8
5 PROPOSED MASTER PLAN SAGGIO HILLS DEVELOPMENT PARK

6.C.c
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Saggio Hills Final Park Master Plan (4059 :

HEALDSBURG PARKS DESIGN + RIVER ACCESS | CITY OF HEALDSBURG COMMUNITY SERVICES | FLETCHER STUDIO

PROPOSED MASTER PLAN

BARBIERI PARK INTEGRATION
INITIAL: PARK AMENITIES AND DESIGN REMAIN AS IS FUTURE: AMENITIES UPGRADED AFTER NEW PARK DEVELOPED

NEW COMMUNITY GARDEN

UPGRADED RESTROOMS

EXISTING LAWN REMAINS

PROMENADES EXTEND TO

INTEGRATE BARBIERI INTO

LARGER IMPROVEMENTS

UPGRADED PLAY AREA

OAK GROVE THRESHOLD PARK AMENITIES AND

DESIGN REMAIN AS IS

6.C.c
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Saggio Hills Final Park Master Plan (4059 :

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 21, 2023
SUBJECT: Presentation of planned and possible alternate SMART station location in Healdsburg
PREPARED BY: Larry Zimmer, Public Works Director
STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):

Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Receive a presentation and provide direction whether an alternate station location shall be pursued.

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:

This public meeting is to determine if an alternative SMART station location should be further considered, and if so, what the process will be. If an alternative is considered, the level of a community engagement will be a key component of the discussion and the proposed process.

BACKGROUND:

The current railroad depot site has long been the planned location of the SMART station in Healdsburg. In 2015, forty-eight parking spaces were constructed in anticipation of coming passenger rail service and per the guidance of the Central Healdsburg Area Plan (CHAP).

With the planned improvements of the 3 North Street site, staff investigated the feasibility of moving the station adjacent to the future Foley Family Pavilion. It is assumed that a station more conveniently located to the downtown area could increase ridership and thereby further reduce use of single passenger vehicles.

Recent analysis by SMART staff has determined that the area immediately adjacent to the 3 North site is not adequate for the station. However, there is enough space just north of that location (across from the City Hall parking lot), or just south of North Street along the West Plaza parking lot.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

SMART has been awarded grant funding adequate to complete rail and pathway construction to

8.A
Packet Pg. 138
Windsor and to start work to Healdsburg. The City currently has an opportunity to reconsider the station location. However, the location of the station is critical in planning the work and it must be decided soon if it should remain at the depot site or closer to the downtown destinations.

SMART and City staff will be presenting the pros and cons of the depot location and an alternate location. Staff is not requesting a determination of the station location at this time, but seeking input from Council if an alternate location should be considered, and if so, what the process should be and what information is desired to make the final decision. If the Council opts to further explore one or more alternative locations, staff recommends holding at least one public workshop to provide information on the options and solicit community feedback prior to bringing the matter back to a City Council meeting.

ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:

Not applicable.

ALTERNATIVES:

City Council could direct staff to investigate other alternative locations to the one recommended.

FISCAL IMPACT:

While there are potential ridership advantages to a station near North Street it will require constructing several additional road crossings including through the 5-way Roundabout. These crossings come with additional costs and traffic impacts, though the impacts will eventually occur when service extends to Cloverdale regardless of the location of the Healdsburg station.

The cost of the additional work, plus cost to update the EIR and additional work at an alternate station has yet to be estimated, nor has it been determined how and by whom it will be paid.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

Not applicable.

ATTACHMENT(S):
8A - Healdsburg Station Location

8.A
Packet Pg. 139
SMART Healdsburg Extension
Station Opportunities
August 21, 2023

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: 8A - Healdsburg Station Location (4153 : SMART Station Location) Healdsburg Extension
Slide 2
• 5-Mile Extension: Windsor to Healdsburg
• Track, Bridges, Drainage Replacements
• Replace the Russian River Bridge
• New Train Control System
• Bicycle & Pedestrian Pathway
• Passenger Station

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: 8A - Healdsburg Station Location (4153 : SMART Station Location) Healdsburg Extension
• Estimated cost Windsor to Healdsburg = $160.5M • Project includes train and pathway • Current available funding $78.1M • RM3 = $40M • TIRCP = $34.3M • Measure M = $2M • Federal earmark = $1.8M • Proposed initial project • Design (Rail/Pathway) Windsor to Healdsburg • Replace Russian River Bridge • Construct pathway Front Street to Bailhache Ave • Unfunded = $82.4M • Awaiting CRISI announcement $28.1M (Oct 2023) 3 8.A.a
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: 8A - Healdsburg Station Location (4153 : SMART Station Location) Design
4 8.A.a
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: 8A - Healdsburg Station Location (4153 : SMART Station Location) Construction
5 8.A.a
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: 8A - Healdsburg Station Location (4153 : SMART Station Location) Station Elements • Passenger Boarding Platform • Shelter & Amenities • Bicycle Parking • Parking - Approx. 30 to 50 dedicated SMART parking
spaces
• Projected ridership: 104,902
annually/413 per weekday
(2006 EIR)
• Approx. 38 weekday
trains/day in Healdsburg
• Weekends: 12 trains/day
Slide 3

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: 8A - Healdsburg Station Location (4153 : SMART Station Location) Potential Station Locations
Slide 3

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: 8A - Healdsburg Station Location (4153 : SMART Station Location) Potential Station Locations with ¼-Mile “Walk Shed”
Slide 3

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: 8A - Healdsburg Station Location (4153 : SMART Station Location) Current Depot Site
Slide 3

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: 8A - Healdsburg Station Location (4153 : SMART Station Location) Current Depot Site
Slide 3

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: 8A - Healdsburg Station Location (4153 : SMART Station Location) Current Depot Site
Slide 3

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: 8A - Healdsburg Station Location (4153 : SMART Station Location) North of North Street
Slide 3

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: 8A - Healdsburg Station Location (4153 : SMART Station Location) North of North Street
Slide 3

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: 8A - Healdsburg Station Location (4153 : SMART Station Location) Between North & Matheson Streets
Slide 3

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: 8A - Healdsburg Station Location (4153 : SMART Station Location) Between North & Matheson Streets
Slide 3

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: 8A - Healdsburg Station Location (4153 : SMART Station Location) 16 Healdsburg Roundabout Gate Overview
• The Healdsburg Roundabout
will feature automatic warning
devices, including gates, lights,
and bells
• Warning devices will be located
at vehicular and pedestrian
approaches
• Warning devices will activate 30
seconds prior to the train
reaching the crossing
• Warning devices will remain
active until the train is detected
to be clear of the crossing
• This will result in approximately
60 seconds of activation time
per train movement
Vehicular
Warning Devices
Pedestrian
Warning Devices
Pedestrian
Warning Devices

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: 8A - Healdsburg Station Location (4153 : SMART Station Location) 17 Healdsburg Roundabout Gate Operation Animation

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: 8A - Healdsburg Station Location (4153 : SMART Station Location) 18 8.A.a
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: 8A - Healdsburg Station Location (4153 : SMART Station Location) Existing Depot
Pros:
- Ample right of way and existing parking already available. - Lowest cost and minimal impact to streets and intersections (until extension to Cloverdale occurs).
- Possible at-grade ped crossing to neighborhoods south of tracks. - Increased redevelopment potential including former Healdsburg Lumber Site.

Cons:
- Real and perceived distance to downtown core (2,000-foot walk to plaza).

Considerations:
- Proximity to residential areas vs. downtown core.
- Ridership numbers.
- Existing planned multi-modal transit hub.
19 8.A.a
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: 8A - Healdsburg Station Location (4153 : SMART Station Location) 20 8.A.a
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: 8A - Healdsburg Station Location (4153 : SMART Station Location) Downtown Location
Pros:
- Proximity to downtown core (700 to 1000-foot walk from West Plaza station location). - Potential of increased ridership downtown.
- Cons:
- 56 public parking spaces in West Plaza Lot and 22 private parking spaces in lot south of Matheson Street currently in SMART rail right of way. Presume all will be impacted and possibly lost.
- Impacts to Foss Creek Trail and existing trees.
- City has no identified funding to assist w/station relocation downtown (CEQA, design, intersection and utility work, Foss Creek trail re-building). - Intersection impacts downtown at 5-way roundabout, Matheson and North Street (until SMART extends to Cloverdale).

Considerations:
- Creates potential redevelopment opportunity for housing at current depot site. - Existing SCT transit stop at plaza downtown.
21 8.A.a
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: 8A - Healdsburg Station Location (4153 : SMART Station Location) Next Steps:
- Schedule Community
Meeting to gather public
input
- City Council provide direction
on station location site
- SMART proceed with design
and construction
22 Connect with us:
www.SonomaMarinTrain.org
Customer Service:

[email protected]
(707) 794- 3330

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: 8A - Healdsburg Station Location (4153 : SMART Station Location)

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 21, 2023
SUBJECT: Chamber of Commerce Professional Services Agreement for Fiscal Year 2023-24
PREPARED BY: Andrew Sturmfels, Assistant City Manager
STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):

Establish Proactive Policies/Programs to Continue to Promote Economic Diversity & Sustainable Growth
Provide Effective Governance
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Adopt a Resolution approving a Professional Services Agreement with the Healdsburg Chamber of Commerce for Fiscal Year 2023-24 and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement.

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:

The Healdsburg Chamber of Commerce is a membership organization that provides support services to the business community in Healdsburg. The Chamber also serves as the Visitor’s Bureau and administers the Healdsburg Tourism Improvement District. Throughout the year, the City engages directly with the Chamber of Commerce and its members through a variety of activities and events.

BACKGROUND:

For several years the City, through its Redevelopment Agency, contracted with the Chamber to provide economic development support services. With the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency, the Council, on August 19, 2013, approved the initial use of Measure V funds for economic development purposes. Beginning in 2014, the Council funded the economic development services provided by the Chamber annually with Measure V (now Measure T) funding. The most recent contract with the Chamber of Commerce for services expired on July 1, 2023.

During the FY 22-23 contract cycle, staff worked closely with the chamber to reframe the scope of work to focus on three main areas, 1.) Community development and economic Development support, 2.) Visitor Center operations, and 3.) Task based deliverables. Task based deliverables

8.B
Packet Pg. 162
were intended to drive specific outcomes where the City and Chamber worked in collaboration to complete tasks based on Council priorities and City projects.

The Chamber of Commerce also serves as the Visitor’s Bureau. Since 1989, the City has leased the property located at 217 Healdsburg Avenue to the Healdsburg Chamber of Commerce for $1 per year. The initial purpose of the lease was to serve as the Chamber of Commerce Offices but over time the office became dual purpose, serving as both the Chamber Office and Visitors Center. After H2 Hotel opened in 2018, the Chamber moved its office to their current location, and the City and Chamber agreed to use the City property as the location of the Visitors Center.

The current lease expired in December 2019 and the Chamber has been operating in a month-tomonth lease with the City since that time.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:
2022-23 Progress Update:

The most recent 2022-23 contract for the chamber was for a total value of $115,000 (including $15,000 in carryover from the prior year). For the contract period ending July 1, 2023, the scope of services included the following activities:

1.) Community Partnership and Economic Development Support a. Completion of CEO Roundtable on June 5th
b. Partner on Merry Healdsburg and other community events c. Partner on Good Morning Healdsburg events
d. Partner on State of the City Breakfast

2.) Visitor Center Operations
a. Operation of the visitor center

3.) Task Based Deliverables:
a. Vacant Commercial and Industrial Property Inventory
b. City Wayfinding Sign Program update and refresh
c. Conducting a Bike Parking Survey with Local Businesses d. Conducting a Food Truck Survey with local businesses* e. Supporting the development of the Climate mobilization Strategy by coordinating feedback and participation from the business community. *During Council Goal Setting in March 2023, the Council removed this item from the City workplan. At the same time, staff requested additional outreach support from the Chamber as part of the City’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Plan Development. The City and Chamber executed a contract amendment replacing the food truck survey with the DEI plan outreach support.

City staff worked closely with the Chamber throughout the year to accomplish these goals. The Chamber completed all the scoped deliverables by the end of the contract term. 2023-24 Proposed Scope
City staff and Councilmember Mitchell, who serves as the Council-appointed Chamber liaison, began meeting with Chamber staff in April to discuss the fiscal year 2023-24 scope of work. As a result of those discussions, staff propose to focus resources on areas where there is alignment with City Council and Chamber goals in working on Affordable Housing and Small Businesses Support, while continuing to deliver a quarterly Commercial property Inventory. The Chamber has also agreed to provide a set number of tickets to annual events to support staff and Council

8.B
Packet Pg. 163
attendance at Chamber events. The full scope of work can be found in Exhibit A to the proposed Resolution.

During the development of the Scope of Work, the Chamber indicated that it planned to cease operations of the Visitor Center and focus on modernizing visitor services. The Chamber has indicated that it has a plan to wind down Visitors Center operations by December 31st, 2023, and implement a digitally focused visitors services strategy moving forward. The Chamber provided City staff Visitor Center data, including usage data and financial statements provided by the Chamber.

The Chamber provided Visitors Center data (both specific to the Visitors Center and Online Reach) that is included in this report as Attachment A. Specific to Operations, the Visitors Center stayed open on average 100 hours per month form July of 2022 to April of 2023. During that time they welcomed 2,904 visitors (approximately 9.5 per day). The Visitor’s Center is currently staffed by one part time staff person and supported by volunteers. However, currently, only one volunteer is supporting the operation.

The Chamber provided year over year Financial Statements for the Visitors Center that are included in this report as Attachment B. The Visitors Center receives funding from the City ($40,000 per year) and the an annual grant award from the Sonoma County Economic Development Board. Grant awards from the County have varied from $18,350 in Fiscal Year 2021-22 to $31,829.50 in Fiscal Year 2022-23. Additionally, Chamber staff have indicated that the County is considering shifting their funding priorities for Tourism and that future grant dollars for visitor center operations are not guaranteed. Under current staffing, the Visitors Center costs are nearly equal to its revenue. However, current staffing does not allow for consistent operation of the Visitors Center and future revenue streams outside of City funding are uncertain.

As part of the planned closure of the physical space, Chamber staff would provide messaging to the community and have indicated they have a strategy in place to modernize visitor services to ensure visitors to our community have access to information to help them best enjoy their stay and experience all that is great about Healdsburg. The Chamber has also indicated that they no longer need the existing Visitor’s Center space at 217 Healdsburg Avenue, subject to having a Right of Entry agreement in place to support staff having easy access to their current offices located in the back of H2 hotel.

Should Council support the proposed Scope of Work, including the wind down of Visitors Center operations, staff will;

1. Begin work on all scope deliverables.

2. Work with the Chamber to wind down in-person Visitor Center operations.

3. Execute a Right of Entry agreement between the City and Chamber to ensure access to the current office location.

4. Begin exploring reuse opportunities for the City owned property at 217 Healdsburg Avenue.

8.B
Packet Pg. 164
ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:

Not Applicable.

ALTERNATIVES:

The Council may choose to:

1. Not approve a PSA with the Chamber of Commerce and provide staff with additional direction.

2. Request revisions to the Scope of Work.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The City Council included $100,000 of Measure T funds to support the Chamber of Commerce Agreement in the FY 2023-24 adopted budget approved on June 6, 2022. In response to the Chambers intention of closing the Visitor’s Center by the end of the calendar year, City and Chamber staff agreed that providing half of the funding previously allocated to support visitor services was appropriate. As such, the proposed scope of work recognizes $80,000 in services, $20,000 less than the budgeted $100,000.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

Pursuant to Title 14, the California Code of Regulations, Section 15302(c) of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) guidelines, approval of this resolution is an administrative activity of the City that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes to the environment.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Resolution
Exhibit A: Chamber Contract Scope FY 23-24
Attachment A: Visitor Data for FY 22-23
Attachment B: Visitors Center Income & Expense data for Apr-Mar 2021-2023

8.B
Packet Pg. 165

CITY OF HEALDSBURG
RESOLUTION NO. _____-2023

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

HEALDSBURG APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

AGREEMENT WITH THE HEALDSBURG CHAMBER OF

COMMERCE AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER

TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Healdsburg has determined that it requires professional services to conduct various economic development services; and
WHEREAS, the Healdsburg Chamber of Commerce (Chamber) has historically provided said professional services and represents that it is duly qualified and experienced to provide said professional services and it is willing to accept responsibility for performing such services; and WHEREAS, the Chamber and City have developed a scope of work for such services that both parties have agreed to and can accomplish; and
WHEREAS, with the dissolution of redevelopment agencies the City Council has determined Measure T funds shall be allocated to fund economic development services; and WHEREAS, the City Council included $100,000 of Measure T funding in the FY 2023- 2024 budget for the purposes of entering into a Professional Services Agreement with the Chamber to provide economic development services.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Healdsburg hereby approves a Professional Services Agreement with the Healdsburg Chamber of Commerce in the amount of $80,000 and authorizes the City Manager to execute the agreement.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 21st day of August 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers: ( )
NOES: Councilmembers: ( )
ABSENT: Councilmembers: ( )
ABSTAINING: Councilmembers: ( )
SO ORDERED: ATTEST:
__________________________________ ____________________________________ Ariel Kelley, Mayor Raina Allan, City Clerk

8.B.a
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Resolution (3914 : Chamber of Commerce PSA) Chamber Contract Proposed Scope
Community Partnership and Economic Development Support: $40,000 - Support business attraction, retention, and expansion (BRE) o Annually report to Council on BRE activities, including:
▪ Business outreach visits and direct support
▪ New business outreach
▪ Business resource seminars/webinars
▪ Local business support campaigns
- Serve as a liaison between the City and the business community by providing opportunity for feedback and engagement on proposed City policies, projects, and initiatives. - Event Production
o Hold annual CEO Roundtable with the Mayor and City Manager o Partner with the City on Community Events, including Merry Healdsburg o Partner with the City to host forums, events, and meetings on specific topics to the business community, including Good Morning Healdsburg and Chamber Government Affairs Committee.
- Chamber Event Participation:
o Chamber to provide the City tickets to the following events:
▪ 8 tickets to the annual breakfast (State of the City) ▪ 2 reserved tables at the annual BBQ
▪ 4 tickets to all chamber mixers and events
Visitor Center Operations: $20,000
- Through December 31st, 2023, operate the Healdsburg Visitor Center, providing visitor services and support.

Task Based Deliverables: $20,000

1. Commercial/Industrial Property Inventory: Provide a vacant commercial and industrial property inventory to the City and update it on a quarterly basis. The inventory should include all properties that are presently vacant and available for lease and/or sale with an address, date available, previous tenant, square footage, listing agent contact, and asking rent (when available). The inventory will assist Chamber and City staff in assessing opportunity sites for new businesses and identifying properties that may need attention or support. ($6,000 total)
a. Provide first report by August 1, 2023 ($1,500)
b. Provide second report by November 1, 2023 ($1,500)
c. Provide third report by February 1, 2023 ($1,500)
d. Provide fourth report by May 1, 2023 ($1,500)

2. Workforce Housing Outreach and Support: In collaboration with the City, support efforts to engage employers and employees on workforce housing issues and opportunities. Support the City in outreach, data collection, and through cosponsoring forums to support workforce housing needs and assist in the development of an updated housing needs analysis ($4,000)

3. Small business recognition and awareness campaign. Using data and information from the City’s planned sales tax capture and leakage analysis, develop targeted marketing and

8.B.b
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Exhibit A: Chamber Contract Scope FY 23-24 (3914 : Chamber of Commerce PSA) recognition for businesses in town to help the community learn more about existing Healdsburg businesses and support local shopping options ($10,000).

Contract Value by Deliverable:

Community Partnership and Economic Development Support $ 40,000 Visitor Center Operations $ 20,000
Task Based Deliverables

1. Commercial/Industrial Property Inventory $ 6,000

2. Workforce Housing Outreach and Support $ 4,000

3. Small Business Recognition and Awareness Campaign $ 10,000 Total Contract Value: $ 80,000

8.B.b
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Exhibit A: Chamber Contract Scope FY 23-24 (3914 : Chamber of Commerce PSA) Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct Nov Dec Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. TOTAL Visitor Center Location:

Walk-In Visitors
Total Number of Visitors 525 408 441 416 359 99 71 161 138 286 2,904 International Visitors (list countries in
comments below, if known) 21 8 7 30 9 5Unknownnknownnknownnknown 80 in comments & attach
correspondence) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Inquiries
Electronic (Website, Social media) N/A N/A N/A 3 1 2 1 1 0 0 8 Email 3 5 4 10 8 7 8 6 11 5 67
Phone 46 54 44 27 36 27 7 34 38 23 336
Other Correspondence Methods: Mail 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 8 Total Inquiries 51 60 48 40 45 36 16 41 52 30 0 0 419
Distribution of materials
SoCo Visitors Guides & Maps
- Digital N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 - Hard Copy 300 300 300 200 150 50 27 43 51 59 1,480
Other Local Guides & Maps
- Digital N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 - Hard Copy 500 425 425 250 200 99 33 61 59 75 2,127
Communication & Outreach
Website - Total Monthly Visitors 8,074 7,701 7,606 7,675 7,813 5,471 5,168 6,216 6,065 6,819 68,608 Facebook - Monthly Post Reach 9,383 9,360 5,118 16,692 33,354 7,409 14,578 9,152 18,563 11,363 134,972 Instagram - Monthly Accounts Reached 2,370 1,985 1,867 2,477 2,959 3,140 2,135 1,943 2,264 1,857 22,997 Twitter - Avg. Monthly Engagement N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 Other Social Media Engagement N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 Press Mentions/Clips - Total Articles - 14 7 11 9 11 14 8 3 8 9 94 Center-related indicators
Total Monthly Hours of Operation 148.2 134 149 143 119 52 58 57.25 63.25 58.25 982 Paid staff
- Number of paid staff 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
- Number of paid staff hours 113 82 121 119 99 42 42 57.25 55.25 55.25 786 Volunteers
- Number of volunteers 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 14
- Number of volunteer hours 35.15 52 28 24 20 10 16 0 8 3 196 Interns
- Number of interns 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
- Number of intern hours 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Visitor Center Monthly Reports - 2022-2023
Healdsburg Chamber of Commerce & Visitors Center
COMMENTS: Countries Below Listed Alphabetically
July Countries: Belgium, Canada, England, Germany, New Zealand, Scotland, Spain, Switzerland August Countries: Canada, Denmark, Italy, Netherlands September Countries: Australia, Canada, Ireland
217 Healdsburg Ave. Healdsburg, CA 95448

8.B.c
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Attachment A: Visitor Data for FY 22-23 (3914 : Chamber of Commerce PSA) Apr '22 - Mar 23 Apr '21 - Mar 22 $ Change
Ordinary Income/Expense
Income
4388 · Visitors' Bureau - Measure V 10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00 4600 · Visitors Bureau Grant 31,829.50 18,350.00 13,479.50 Total Income 41,829.50 18,350.00 23,479.50
Gross Profit 41,829.50 18,350.00 23,479.50
Expense
5100 · Staff Expenses
5200 · Salaries 41,577.08 36,288.78 5,288.30
5210 · Medical 567.00 410.40 156.60
5230 · Workers' Comp Insurance 0.00 120.94 -120.94
5240 · Payroll Service Expense 70.97 88.70 -17.73
5300 · Payroll Tax Expenses 3,687.50 3,295.50 392.00
Total 5100 · Staff Expenses 45,902.55 40,204.32 5,698.23 5500 · Food & Travel
5505 · Food 158.43 0.00 158.43
Total 5500 · Food & Travel 158.43 0.00 158.43
6050 · Utilities 3,669.21 3,650.49 18.72
6060 · Contract Services
6062 · Cleaning 2,516.25 2,013.60 502.65
6063 · Accounting 5,226.00 4,213.00 1,013.00
6064 · Legal 0.00 500.00 -500.00
6065 · Professional Services 0.00 2,040.00 -2,040.00
6066 · IT Contracted Support 2,868.15 1,339.00 1,529.15 Total 6060 · Contract Services 10,610.40 10,105.60 504.80 6070 · Liability Insurance 1,434.05 1,095.99 338.06
6120 · Postage and Delivery 0.00 26.54 -26.54
6230 · Marketing/Public Relations 22.50 0.00 22.50
6410 · Office Supplies/Services 293.38 26.49 266.89
6440 · Equipment Maintenance 0.00 588.90 -588.90
6450 · Equipment Rental 3,234.02 3,190.41 43.61
6500 · Web Site Maint/Development 1,743.50 956.00 787.50 6505 · GrowthZone Monthly Fees 1,527.78 1,146.30 381.48 6550 · Building/Property Maintenance 489.97 368.05 121.92 Total Expense 69,085.79 61,359.09 7,726.70
Net Ordinary Income -27,256.29 -43,009.09 15,752.80
Net Income -27,256.29 -43,009.09 15,752.80
3:36 PM Healdsburg Chamber of Commerce
06/09/23 Visitor Center - Income & Expense
Cash Basis April 2022 through March 2023

8.B.d
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Attachment B: Visitors Center Income & Expense data for Apr-Mar 2021-2023 (3914 : Chamber of Commerce PSA)

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 21, 2023
SUBJECT: North Village Fire Substation Project Bid Award PREPARED BY: Clay Thistle, Senior Engineer
STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):

Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Adopt a Resolution rejecting the bid protest made by Carr’s Construction Service, Inc.; conditionally awarding the North Village Fire Substation Project construction contract to Holly Construction, Inc. of Santa Rosa, California, in the amount of $5,599,000.00; authorizing the City Manager to execute the contract; authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and approve contract change orders up to 15% of the original contract amount; approving a Professional Services Agreement with Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. for the not-to-exceed amount of $270,480.00 to provide Inspector of Record Service; approving a Professional Services Agreement with RRM Design Group for the not-to-exceed amount of $309,300.00 to provide Architectural Construction Support and Testing Services, authorizing the City Manager to execute the Agreements and amending the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Adopted Budget.

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:

The Project was advertised for public bidding in the Santa Rosa Press Democrat and on the City’s website.

Prior to beginning construction, advance notices will be provided to adjacent properties. They will be advised of potential impacts, parking restrictions and the planned work duration. The City project manager’s direct contact information will be provided for additional information and for any concerns that arise during the construction process.

BACKGROUND:

In 2011, the City Council approved the Saggio Hills project (now known as "Montage Healdsburg") which includes a 130-key resort, 70 single-family residences, and associated amenities plus public improvements including a community park, a pump station, a Fire Substation, and property for a future affordable housing development.

8.C
Packet Pg. 171
The City Council and Sonoma Luxury Resorts LLC (“SLR”) entered into a Development Agreement (“Saggio DA”) which, as amended, required SLR to prepare the conceptual design for the Fire Substation, complete specified site improvements, transfer title to the 0.85-acre Fire Substation parcel to the City, and contribute $1.75M towards design and construction of the Fire Substation. The balance of SLR’s Fire Substation Contribution ($1,599,586) was placed in an escrow account to be released to the City upon issuance of a notice to proceed for construction of the Fire Substation. Title to the fire substation parcel was transferred to the City in January 2023.

In April 2020, the City Council and Comstock Healdsburg LLC ("Comstock") entered into a Development Agreement for the North Village project ("North Village DA"). The North Village DA, as amended, requires Comstock to complete the construction plans for the Fire Substation and to provide a total $2 million Fire Substation contribution. The City and Comstock are in the process of determining the balance of the Fire Substation contribution that will be remitted to the City. Comstock’s remaining contribution is currently estimated at $1,762,415.

The Saggio DA and the Comstock DA obligate the City to pay Fire Substation costs in excess of the two developer contributions and to complete construction of the Fire Substation by December 31, 2024.

In 2018, the Planning Commission approved an initial Design Review permit (DR 2018-02) for the Fire Substation. After expiration of that permit, a subsequent Design Review permit (DR 2021-11) was approved in 2021.

In 2019, the City entered into a contract with Municipal Resource Group, LLC ("MRG") to conduct a Fire Services Impact Assessment to provide an independent and objective evaluation of service demands related to new and planned development in northern Healdsburg. The report identified numerous benefits to fire services both in north Healdsburg and citywide. After receiving the analysis along with cost estimates that identified an approximately $3M funding gap for the Fire Substation Project, the City Council directed staff to move forward with the project and work to identify alternative funding sources. The subsequently approved North Village DA included a developer contribution which helps fund the Fire Substation, however a substantial funding gap remained due to inflation and supply chain issues. As part of the Fiscal Year 2022-23 and 2023-24 budget development process, staff recommended, and Council supported, using Measure T funds to support the outstanding funding needs.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

A notice inviting bids was advertised in accordance with all applicable procedures, and the City received eleven bids. The lowest apparent and responsive bid was from Holly Construction, Inc. of Santa Rosa, California in the amount of $5,599,000.00. The other bids received ranged from the apparent second low bid of $5,943,000.00 to a high bid of $8,222,878.00. The low bid was lower than the engineer’s estimate of $7,486,336.00 by approximately 25% but only approximately 6% lower than the second low bid.

The lower-than-expected construction bid price can be attributed to the large number of bidders creating competitive pricing.

8.C
Packet Pg. 172
The apparent second low bidder, Carr’s Construction Service, Inc., submitted an official bid protest in accordance with the project bidding requirements. The protest alleged Holly Construction, Inc.’s bid was not responsive for failure to list a subcontractor meeting the qualifications required for the fuel storage tank system installation in their bid proposal. Holly Construction, Inc. responded to Carr’s Construction Service, Inc.’s protest explaining that the fuel storage tank system installation would be performed by a qualified second-tier subcontractor and therefore, did not require listing. A second-tier subcontractor is a subcontractor of a subcontractor.

Staff reviewed the protest and confirmed that, in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 4104, second-tier subcontractors do not need to be listed.

The Holly Construction bid was complete and timely regarding all other requirements.

Holly Construction, Inc. possesses the required license(s) and is otherwise qualified to complete the project. It is recommended that the City Council reject the Carr’s Construction Service, Inc., protest and award the contract to Holly Construction, Inc.

To provide the necessary Inspector of Record (IOR) as required based upon the public safety occupancy category of the building, City staff solicited, received, and reviewed a proposal from Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. to provide these services for the Project. Staff has reviewed the proposed not-to-exceed fee of $270,480.00 and, based on the proposed scope of service and their professional expertise, staff believes the cost of services is reasonable.

Bureau Veritas currently provides consultant plan review and building inspection services for the City Building Department. They performed the plan review for this project and are thoroughly knowledgeable of the project details. This would be an extension of services currently being provided but via separate contract therefore multiple proposals were not solicited.

To provide the needed architectural support during construction, material testing and special inspections services, City staff solicited, received, and reviewed a proposal from RRM Design Group in the not-to-exceed amount of $309,300.00. RRM Design Group was the project design architect and originally contracted with Comstock as part of the North Village development for services through construction. This agreement will provide those services directly with the City.

Maintaining a consistent architect of record from design through construction is essential and customary in construction of similar facilities therefore multiple proposals were not solicited.

ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:

Reuse and recycling will be used to divert much of the construction waste from landfill.

The fire substation has been designed as all-electric and will operate completely free from natural gas. Additionally, the project includes bioretention for the treatment of stormwater runoff.

ALTERNATIVES:

Continue action on this item to a future Council meeting and direct staff to provide additional

8.C
Packet Pg. 173
information and/or analysis.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The contracts proposed for approval are a construction contract with Holly Construction, Inc. for $5,599,000 with a 15% contingency of $839,850 totaling $6,438,850, a contract with Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. for $270,480 for Inspector of Record Services, and a Professional Services Agreement with RRM Design Group for $309,300. The project estimate also includes $346,864 in staff time and permit fees for a total remaining cost of $7,365,494.

The adopted Fiscal Year 2022-23 budget included $6,049,586 in appropriations for the Fire Substation Project OT001. The project was funded by $1,500,000 in contributions from the North Village development, $1,599,586 from the Saggio Hills development, and $2,950,000 from the City Measure T Fund.

In FY 2022-23 expenses for staff time and permits totaled $39,686 funded by the Measure T fund resulting in $2,910,314 in available Measure T funds to be re-budgeted in FY 23-24. Upon issuance of the notice to proceed for the construction contract, the $1,599,586 contribution from the Saggio Hills development will be available from escrow. The North Village Development Agreement committed $2,076,000 towards the design and construction of the Fire Substation.

After completing cost accounting for the design costs borne by the developer, the final contribution towards the construction is anticipated to be $1,762,415, approximately $262,415 more than the $1,500,000 budgeted in FY 2022-23.

The remaining shortfall of $1,093,179 is proposed to be funded by a combination of reallocated ARPA and Measure T funding. The Pavement Preventative Maintenance Project ST001 had a total adopted budget of $2,257,208. The project included $586,000 in ARPA funding in FY 22- 23 and $472,788 in ARPA funding in FY 23-24. The FY 23-24 budget also included $291,212 of Measure T funding. The remaining $671,208 was funded by SB1 RMRA monies across both Fiscal Years.

Staff are proposing to prioritize the completion of the Fire Substation and re-allocate the entire $1,058,788 in ARPA funds and $34,391 of Measure T funding from the Pavement Preventative Maintenance Project to the Fire Substation Project. As a result, the Pavement Preventative Maintenance Project would be deferred until additional funding is available.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

On January 31, 2011, the Healdsburg City Council certified the Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") for the Saggio Hills Planned Development Project (State Clearinghouse No. 2003062025). In 2018, in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan or Zoning), an Environmental Checklist was prepared for the proposed Fire Substation project to evaluate whether the project remained within the scope of the FEIR. The Environmental Checklist determined that the impacts of the project would be the same as or less than those identified in the FEIR. Accordingly, the Planning Commission determined that no further environmental review was required for the Fire Substation because it would not result in on-site, off-site or cumulatively significant effects on the environment that were not examined in the certified EIR.

8.C
Packet Pg. 174
ATTACHMENT(S):

Resolution
Exhibit A
Bid Summary
Carr's Construction Protest Letter
Holly Construction Response

8.C
Packet Pg. 175

CITY OF HEALDSBURG
RESOLUTION NO. __-2023

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HEALDSBURG REJECTING THE BID PROTEST MADE BY CARR’S CONSTRUCTION
SERVICE, INC.; CONDITIONALLY AWARDING THE NORTH VILLAGE

FIRE SUBSTATION PROJECT CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO HOLLY

CONSTRUCTION OF SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA, IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,599,000.00; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND APPROVE CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS UP TO 15% OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT; APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA, INC. IN THE NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF $270,480.00 TO PROVIDE INSPECTOR OF RECORD SERVICE; APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

AGREEMENT WITH RRM DESIGN GROUP IN THE NOT-TO-EXCEED
AMOUNT OF $309,300.00 TO PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL

CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT AND TESTING SERVICES FOR THE PROJECT,

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENTS, AND AMENDING THE ADOPTED FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 BUDGET
WHEREAS, the notice inviting bids for the North Village Fire Substation Project was advertised in accordance with applicable procedures that resulted in the city receiving eleven bids; and
WHEREAS, the apparent lowest bid was submitted by Holly Construction in the amount of $5,599,000.00; and
WHEREAS, Carr’s Construction Service, Inc., Inc., the apparent 2nd lowest bidder, submitted an official bid protest in accordance with the project bidding requirements; and WHEREAS, the protest alleged Holly Construction, Inc.’s bid was not responsive for failure to list a subcontractor meeting the qualifications required for the fuel storage tank system installation in their bid proposal; and
WHEREAS, Holly Construction, Inc. responded to Carr’s Construction Service, Inc.’s protest explaining that the fuel storage tank system installation would be performed by a qualified 2 nd
-tier subcontractor and did not require listing; and
WHEREAS, City staff reviewed the protest with the City Attorney and confirmed that in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 4104 2
nd
-tier subcontractors do not need to be
listed; and
WHEREAS, staff has verified that Holly Construction, Inc. possesses the required license(s) and is otherwise qualified to complete the project; and

8.C.a
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Resolution (4137 : North Village Fire Substation Project Bid Award) Resolution No. -2023

WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the proposal and determined that there are no irregularities; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends rejecting reject the Carr’s Construction Service, Inc., protest and awarding the contract to Holly Construction, Inc. in the amount of $5,599,000.00; and WHEREAS, staff recommend a 15% contract contingency of $839,850.00; and WHEREAS, specialized Inspector of Record (IOR) oversight is required based upon the occupancy category of the building; and
WHEREAS, staff solicited, received, and reviewed a proposal from Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. to provide IOR services for the project for a not-to-exceed fee of $270,480.00; and WHEREAS, architectural support during construction, material testing and special inspections services are need for the project; and
WHEREAS, staff solicited, received, and reviewed a proposal from RRM Design Group for architectural support during construction, material testing and special inspections services for the project for a not-to-exceed fee of $309,300.00; and WHEREAS, On January 31, 2011, the Healdsburg City Council certified the Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") for the Saggio Hills Planned Development Project (State Clearinghouse No. 2003062025) which included the North Village Fire Substation; and WHEREAS, In 2018 City Planning Commission determined that no further environmental review was required for the Fire Substation because it would not result in on-site, off-site or cumulatively significant effects on the environment that were not examined in the certified EIR.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Healdsburg hereby:

1. Finds that the project has complied with the required CEQA review, because the Project will not result in on-site, off-site or cumulatively significant effects on the environment that were not already analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Report certified by the Healdsburg City Council on January 31, 2011.

2. Rejects the bid protest made by Carr’s Construction Service, Inc.

3. Conditionally awards the North Village Fire Substation Project to Holly Construction, Inc.

4. Authorizes the City Manager to execute the North Village Fire Substation Project Construction Contract.

8.C.a
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Resolution (4137 : North Village Fire Substation Project Bid Award) Resolution No. -2023

5. Authorizes the City Manager to negotiate and approve contract change orders up to ten percent (15%) of the original contract amount, issue the notice of award to Holly Construction, Inc. and to otherwise administer the Project.

6. Approves a Professional Services Agreement with Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. in the not-to-exceed amount of $270,480.00 to provide Inspector of Record Service for the Project.

7. Approves a Professional Services Agreement with RRM Design Group in the not-to-exceed amount of $309,300.00 to provide Architectural Construction Support and Testing Services for the Project.

8. Authorizes the City Manager to execute the Professional Services Agreement with Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. and RRM Design Group.

9. Approves amending the adopted Fiscal Year 2023-2024 budget as depicted on the attached Exhibit A.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 21st day of August 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAINING: Councilmembers:

SO ORDERED: ATTEST:
_________________________________ ____________________________________ Ariel Kelley, Mayor Raina Allan, City Clerk

8.C.a
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Resolution (4137 : North Village Fire Substation Project Bid Award) Resolution No.

Exhibit A
Account Number Increase Amount Decrease Amount Description 102-6101-45000-OT001 $ 7,365,494 Re-establish and Increase Fire Substation Project OT001 Budget 102-1000-37701-00000 $ 1,599,586 Re-establish Saggio Hills Contribution 102-1000-37701-00000 $ 1,762,415 Re-establish and True-up North Village Contribution 102-1000-39001-00000 $ 2,910,314 Re-establish Transfer in from Measure T 105-8080-42301-00000 $ 2,910,314 Re-establish Transfer out of Measure T 512-6162-45000-ST001 $ 1,093,179 Reallocate funding from Pavement Preventative Maintenance Project ST001 101-8080-42301-00000 $ 586,000 Re-establish Transfer out from General Fund-ARPA 102-1000-39001-00000 $ 586,000 Re-establish Transfer in from General Fund-ARPA FY 23-24 Budget Amendment

8.C.b
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Exhibit A (4137 : North Village Fire Substation Project Bid Award) Item Item Description
Unit Cost (in
figures) Total Cost (in figures
Unit Cost (in
figures)
Total Cost (in
figures
Unit Cost (in
figures)
Total Cost (in
figures
Unit Cost (in
figures)
Total Cost (in
figures
Unit Cost (in
figures)
Total Cost (in
figures
Unit Cost (in
figures)
Total Cost (in
figures
Unit Cost (in
figures)
Total Cost (in
figures
Unit Cost (in
figures)
Total Cost (in
figures
Unit Cost (in
figures)
Total Cost (in
figures
Unit Cost (in
figures)
Total Cost (in
figures
Unit Cost (in
figures)
Total Cost (in
figures
1 Fire Subsation
1 $6,087,000.00 1 $6,178,000.00 1 $5,853,000.00 1 $5,970,000.00 1 $5,509,000.00 1 $5,929,042.00 1 $5,992,000.00 1 $6,385,000.00 1 $6,489,000.00 1 $8,132,878.00 1 $6,600,000.00 2 Fire Station Alerting System
Allowance 1 $90,000.00 1 $90,000.00 1 $90,000.00 1 $90,000.00 1 $90,000.00 1 $90,000.00 1 $90,000.00 1 $90,000.00 1 $90,000.00 1 $90,000.00 1 $90,000.00 $6,177,000.00 $6,268,000.00 $5,943,000.00 $6,060,000.00 $5,599,000.00 $6,019,042.00 $6,082,000.00 $6,475,000.00 $6,579,000.00 $8,222,878.00 $6,690,000.00 Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount RCX
Windsor, Ca Grading, Paving & Site Utilties
$748,419
RR Maher
Napa, Ca
Concrete
$502,900
Kelco Construction
Fortuna, Ca
Trenching
$65,000
Northwest
Santa Rosa, Ca
Site Work
$734,600
R&R Maher
Napa, Ca
Concrete
$480,000
Engelke Construction
Healdsburg, Ca
Site Clearing
Grade & Pave
$848,600
Peck and Hiller
Napa, Ca
Concrete
$255,280
R & R Maher
Napa, Ca
Concrete
$460,000
R & R Maher
Napa, Ca
Concrete
$505,900
Urata & Sons
Rancho Cordova, Ca
Concrete
$557,674
Oakgrove
Petaluma, Ca
Heavy Civil
$910,000
Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Elite Landscape
Clovis, Ca
Landscape & Irrigation
$155,700
Specialty Flooring
Fontana, Ca
Polished Concrete
$38,231
Northwest General
Engineering
Santa Rosa, Ca
Sitework
$790,646
R&R Maher Construction
Napa, Ca
Concerte
$505,000
Shannon Masonry
Santa Rosa, Ca
Masonry
$83,935
Peck & Hiller Structural
Concrete
Napa,Ca
Concrete
$255,280
Rouse Masonry
Ukiah, Ca
Masonry
$84,126
Northcoast Steel
Santa Rosa, Ca
Rebar
$36,250
Rouse Masonry
Ukiah, Ca
Masonry
$90,899
Engelke Construction
Healdsburg, Ca
Grading & Paving
$923,042
Brothers Landscaping
Rohnert Park, Ca
Concrete
$416,000
Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Crusader Fence
Rancho Cordova, Ca
Fences & Gates
$149,532
SMC
Santa Rosa, Ca
Masonry
$83,935
R&R Maher Construcutin
Napa, Ca
Concrete
$506,000
RP Coating
Hayward, Ca
Concrete Floor Finishes
$25,500
Metalset Inc.

Richmond, Ca
Metals
$110,000
Landavazo Brothers
Hayward, Ca
Site Concrete
$181,500
Metal Set
Richmond, Ca
Structural Steel
$120,000
BK Mill
Newark, Ca
Casework
$72,000
Ahlborn
Santa Rosa, Ca
Structural Steel
$189,210
Shannn Masonry
Santa Rosa, Ca
CMO Walls
$83,935
Marina Landscape
Orange, Ca
Landscape
$176,000
Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Gonsalves &Santucci
Concord, Ca
Concrete &
Reinforcing Steel
$491,073
Alhborn
Santa Rosa, Ca
Structural Steel
$189,210
Shannon Masonry
Construction
Santa Rosa, Ca
Masonry
$83,935
Shannon Masonry
Santa Rosa, Ca
Masonry
$83,900
Jacobson Fencing
Santa Rosa, Ca
Fencing
$112,707
Marina Landscape
Orange, Ca
Landscape
$140,000
Valhalla
Capitola, Ca
Rough & Finish
Carpentry
$608,000
Universal Plastrics
Roseville, Ca
FRP
$97,000
Jr Stephens
Arcata, ca
Casework
$33,352
Landcaster Burns
Roseville, Ca
Structural Steel
$112,550
Sonoma Marin
Electric
Sebastopol, Ca
Electrical
$980,000
Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Rouse Masonry
Ukiah, Ca
Masonry
$90,899
BK Mill
Newark, Ca
Casework
$71,765
Alhborn Fencing
Santa Rosa, Ca
Strcuture Steel
$189,210
Ahlborn Company
Santa Rosa, Ca
Metals
$189,000
BK Mill
Newark, Ca
Casework
$71,765
Rouse Masonry
Ukiah, Ca
Unit Masonry
$90,899
Jr Stevens
Arcata, Ca
Architectual Casework
$33,352
RP Coatings
Hayward, Ca
Epoxy Floor
$25,600
Coast
Santa Rosa, Ca
Insulation
$77,400
Rick Slater
San Jose, Ca
Rough Carpentry
$922,307.46
Peterson Mechanical
Sonoma, Ca
Mechanical &
Plumbing
$645,000
Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Martin's Metal
Fabrication
Vavaville, Ca
Structural and Misc Steel
$178,290
Universal Plastics
Roseville, Ca
FRP
$46,099
Coast Building Products
Santa Rosa, Ca
Insulation
$77,400
Shasta Wood Products
Cottonwood, Ca
Casework
$69,000
Coast Building Products
Daytona Beach, FL
Insulation
$77,400
R McClure Electric
Cotati, Ca
Electrical
$750,000
Urata & Sons
Rancho Cordova, Ca
Concrete & Pacving
$217,000
A&D Automatic Gate
Redwood City, Ca
Gate Operators
$37,300
Tecta America
Sacramento, Ca
Roofing
$128,041
B-K Mill
Newark, Ca
Casework
$71,765
Rouse Masonry
Ukiah, Ca
Masonry
$84,000
Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Alta Standard Builders
Fresno, Ca
Siding and Paneling
$187,825
Coast
Santa Rosa, Ca
Insulation
$77,400 Henris Roofing Co
Petaluma, Ca
Roofing & Gutters
$180,155
Coast Building Products
Santa Rosa, Ca
Insulation
$77,400
Henris Roofing Co
Petaluma, Ca
Roofing
$155,000
Landcaster Burns
Construction
Roseville, Ca
Structural Steel
$112,550
Coast
Santa Clara, Ca
Thermall Insulation
$67,910
Hudock Fire Protection
Santa Rosa, Ca
Fire Supression
$50,300
National Garage Door
Rancho Cordova, Ca
Garage Doors
$99,200
Forderer
Hayward, Ca
Doors
$93,800
Ahlborn
Santa Rosa, Ca
Fencing
$151,000
Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Alta Standard Builders
Fresno, Ca
Rough Carpentry
$350,000
Henris
Petaluma, Ca
Roofing
$180,155
Overhead Door Co
Santa Rosa, Ca
Overhead Coiling &
Sectional Doors
$97,720
Henris Roofing
Petaluma, Ca
Roofing
$180,000
Overhead Door
Santa Rosa, Ca
Overhead
$97,720
Crusander Fence
Rancho Cordova, Ca
Steel Fence & Gates
$149,532
Tecta America
Rancho Cordova
Roofing
$128,041
KBI
Petaluma, Ca
Paint
$34,000
Glass & Sash
San Rafael, Ca
Aluminum Strefornt
$108,110
Overhead Doors
Santa Rosa, Ca
Overhead Doors
$97,720
Ahlborn
Santa Rosa, Ca
Structural Steel
$190,000
Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount BK Mill & Fixtures
Newark, Ca
Finish Carpentry & Millwork
$71,915
Overhead Door
Santa Rosa, Ca
Overhead Door
$97,720
Norcal Glass Products
Rohnert Park, Ca
Storefront, Windows,
Glazing
$114,000
Barton Overhead Door
Sonoma, Ca
Overhead Coiling
&Sectional Doors
$130,000
Nor Cal Glass
Rohnert Park, Ca
Glass
$103,620
Tecta America
Rancho Cordova, Ca
Roofing
$128,041
National Garage Door
Racho Cordova, Ca
Overhead Doors
$99,200
Norcal Glass Products
Rohnert Park, Ca
Glazing
$114,000
Northern Pacific
Drywall
Santa Rosa, Ca
Drywall
$70,426
Nor Cal Glass
Sonora, Ca
Glass & Glazing
$114,000
MKB
Cloverdale, Ca
Siding & Framing
$519,000
Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Accurate Firestop &
Insulation
Pleasanton, Ca
Insulation
$33,918
Nor Cal
Rohnert Park, Ca
Glazing
$114,000
KBI
Petaluma, Ca
Painting
$33,850
Barton Overhead Door
Sonoma, Ca
Sectional Doors
$130,000
North Pacific Drywall
Santa Rosa, Ca
Drywall
$70,426
Glass & Sash
San Rafael, Ca
Windows & Storefront
$108,110
AAC Glass
Hayward, Ca
Glazed Aluminum
Curtanwalls
$113,600
National Garage Door
Rancho Cordova, Ca
Overhead Door
$100,000
Peterson Tile
Santa Rosa, Ca
Tile
$27,202
Concord Drywall
Concord, Ca
Drywall
$86,105
Coast Building
Products
Santa Rosa, Ca
Insulation
$77,500
Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Tecta America
Rancho Cordova, Ca
Roofing & Metal
$128,000
Northern Pacific
Santa Rosa, Ca
Gypboard
$70,426
Hudock Fire Protection
Santa Rosa, Ca
Fire Sprinklers
$50,300
Glass & Sash
San Rafael, Ca
Storefront, Windows,
Glazing
$108,000
KBI
Petaluma, Ca
Painting
$33,850
North Bay Overhead
Doors
Petaluma, Ca
Sectional Doors
$93,000
Golden Gate
Burlingame, Ca
Gypsum Board
$72,417
Ahlborn
Santa Rosa, Ca
Fence & Steel
$340,000
KBI
Petaluma, Ca
Paint
$33,850
Bellanti Plumbing
South San Francisco, Ca
Plumbing
$352,316
Overhead Door Co
Santa Rosa, Ca
Overhead Doors
$98,000
Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Northbay Overhead Doors
Petaluma, Ca
Coiling & Sectional Doors
$93,000
Frost
Vallejo, Ca
Tilting
$35,077
Azevedo Plumbing
Windsor, Ca
Plumbing
$230,000
Northern Pacific Drywall
Santa Rosa, Ca
Gypsum
$70,426
Westside Mechanical
Cotati, Ca
Fire Supression
$48,500
North Bay Drywall
Cotati, Ca
Gypsum Board
Assemblies
$84,000
A Plus Tile
Loomis, Ca
Ceramic Tile
$49,998
Henris Roofing
Petaluma, Ca
Roofing
$180,200
Hudock Fire Protection
Santa Rosa, Ca
Fire Sprinkles
$50,300
Sonoma Marin Electrical
Sebastopl, Ca
Electrical
$982,553
BL Glass
Santa Rosa, Ca
Glazing
$134,000
Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Integrated Glass Concepts
Benicia, Ca
Glazing & Windows
$78,500
KBI
Petaluma, Ca
Painting
$33,850
Peterson Mechanical
Sonoma, Ca
HVAC
$377, 600
Peterson Tile
Santa Rosa, Ca
Tiling
$27,200
CBS
Santa Rosa, Ca
Plumbing
$231,000
Accurate Fire Stop
Pleasanton, Ca
Insulation
$36,112
Bay Cities Fire
Santa Rosa, Ca
Fire Suppression
System
$69,680
Coast Building Products
Santa Rosa, Ca
Insulation
$77,400
CBS
Santa Rosa, Ca
Plumbing
$235,500
C L Heating & Air, Inc
Sacramento, Ca
HVAC
$459,040
Lowell Drywall
Nice, Ca
Drywall
$56,000
Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Golden Gate Drywall
Burlingame, Ca
Drywall
$72,417
Hudock
Sant Rosa, Ca
Fire Sprinklers
$50,300
Weindner Fire
Vehicle Exhaust System
Midvale, UT
Vehicle Exhaust System
$65,754
KBI
Petaluma, Ca
Painting
$33,850
Lunardi Electric
Santa Rosa, Ca
Electric
$867,000
Hudoc Fire Protection
Santa Rosa, Ca
Fire Supression System
$50,300
RG Plumbing
Santa Rosa, Ca
Plumbing
$209,000
Frost Title
Vallejo, Ca
Tile
$35,100
Simpson Sheet Metal
Santa Rosa, Ca
HVAC
$394,258
A+ Tile and Stone
Loomis, Ca
Ceramic Tile
$50,000
Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Valdez Painting
Sacramento, Ca
Painting
$47,039
CBS
Santa Rosa, Ca
Plumbing
$235,500
R. McClure Electric
Cotati, Ca
Electrical
$747,000
Presidential Fire
Sacramento, Ca
Fire Supression System
$68,700
Westpac
Windsor, Ca
Site Work
$759,778
RG Plumbing
Santa Rosa, Ca
Plumbing
$169,900
Calquinez Heating & Air
Benicia, Ca
HVAC
$416,700
Rouse Masonry
Ukiah, Ca
Masonry
$84,200
R McClure Electrical
Cotati, Ca
Electrical
$750,000
DSB Flooring
Petaluma, Ca
Flooring
$30,000
Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount RG Plumbing Group
Santa Rosa, Ca
Plumbing
$209,900
Simpson
Santa Rosa, Ca
HVAC
$394,258
Crusader Fence Co
Rancho Cordova, Ca
Fencing & Gates
$149,532
RG Plumbing
Santa Rosa, Ca
Plumbing
$209,900
Marina Landscaping
Lathrop, Ca
Landscaoping
$175,870
Top Notch Mechanical
Sacramento, Ca
HVAC
$363,000
R McClure Electric
Cotati, Ca
Electrical
$750,000
Marina Landscape
Lathrop, Ca
Landscape
$175,0000
Westpac
Healdsburg, Ca
Earthworks
$802,770
Bay Cities
Santa Rosa, Ca
Fire Sprinkles
$69,700
Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Battalion One Fire
Protection
San Leandro, Ca
Fire Sprinklers
$60,426
McClure
Cotati, Ca
Electrical
$780,000
Ca Turk & Landscaping
Fresno, Ca
Landscaping &
Irrigation
$193,500
Simpson Sheet Metal
Santa Rosa, Ca
HVAC
$394,000
Top Notch
Sacramento, Ca
HVAC
$363,000
Northwest General
Enginerring
Santa Rosa, Ca
Earthwork
$811,852
Northbay Drywall
Cotati, Ca
Drywall
$88,000
Bagley Enterprises
Lodi, Ca
Fuel Storage Tanks
$120,200
Tecta America
Sacramento, Ca
Roofing
$128,500
Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Top Noptch Mechanical
Sacramento, Ca
HVAC
$363,000
NWGE
Santa Rosa, Ca
Sitework
$811,854
Bagley Enterprises
Lodi, Ca
Fuel Storage Tank
$120,200
R McClure
Cotati, Ca
Electrical
$750,000
Crusader
Rancho Cordova, Ca
Fencing
$149,532
Top Notch Mechanical
Sacremento, Ca
HVAC
$350,000
Crusader Fence
Ranco Cordova, Ca
Decrative Fencing
$149,532
Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Richard Brazil
Salinis, Ca
Electrical, Generator System
Joint Trench
$604,000
Marina
Lathrop, Ca
Landscaping
$167,489
A & D Automatic Gate Co
Redwood City, Ca
Automatic Gates
Operators
$37,264
Neary Landscape
Cotati, Ca
Landscape
$159,000
Marina Landscape
Lodi, Ca
Planting & Irrigation
$140,000
Sonoma Marin Electric
Sebastopol, Ca
Electrical
$1,050,000
Electronic Innovations
Richmond, Ca
Auto Gates
$39,931
Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Bagley Enterprises
Lodi, Ca
Diesel Fuel Storage Tank
$120,200
Jacobson Fence Co
Santa Rosa, Ca
Fencing
$193,205
Northern Pacific Drywall
Santa Rosa, Ca
Drywall
$70,426
Construction Ahead
Exterior
South Elgin, IL
Rough Carpentry
$294,440 Bagley Enterprises
Lodi, Ca
Above Groud Fuel
Storage Tanks
$774,802
Terracons
San Francisco, Ca
Earthworks, Utilties,
Paving
$786,000
Marina Landscaping
Lathrop, Ca
Landscaping
$175,870
Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount A&D Automatic Gate Co
Redwood Valley, Ca
Gate Operators
$ 37,264
Don Lee
Ceres, Ca
Fuel Tank
$63,875
Universal Platics
Roseville, Ca
Wall Paneling
$44,100
Universal Plastics Inc
Roseville, Ca
FRP
$46,0999
KBI
Petaluma, Ca
Painting
Painting & Coating
$33,850
RG plumbing
Santa Rosa, Ca
Plumbing
$209,000
Sub/Location Trade/Amount Sub/Location Trade/Amount
J.R Stephens Co
Arcata, Ca
Cabinets & Counter
Tops
$33,352
Jacobson Fence
Santa Rosa, Ca
Fencing
$240,000
Sub/Location Trade/Amount
A &D Autonatic Gates
Redwood City, Ca
Automatic Gates
$37,000
FRC, Inc. Buhler Commercial
Kirby Constructions
Ridgeview Builders, Inc. Company, Inc.

Holly Construction,
Inc. Arntz, Builders, Inc.

Giant Construction,
LLC
CWS Construction
Group, Inc.

Carr's Construction
GCCI, Inc. Service, Inc.

Base Bid Total
Midstate Construction
Bid Opening: Construction of the North Village Fire
Substation 7/25/2023 @ 2PM

8.C.c
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Bid Summary (4137 : North Village Fire Substation Project Bid Award)

8.C.d
Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Carr's Construction Protest Letter (4137 : North Village Fire Substation Project Bid Award)

8.C.d
Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Carr's Construction Protest Letter (4137 : North Village Fire Substation Project Bid Award)

8.C.d
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Carr's Construction Protest Letter (4137 : North Village Fire Substation Project Bid Award)

8.C.d
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Carr's Construction Protest Letter (4137 : North Village Fire Substation Project Bid Award)

8.C.d
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Carr's Construction Protest Letter (4137 : North Village Fire Substation Project Bid Award)

8.C.d
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Carr's Construction Protest Letter (4137 : North Village Fire Substation Project Bid Award)

8.C.d
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Carr's Construction Protest Letter (4137 : North Village Fire Substation Project Bid Award)

8.C.e
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Holly Construction Response (4137 : North Village Fire Substation Project Bid Award)

8.C.e
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Holly Construction Response (4137 : North Village Fire Substation Project Bid Award)

8.C.e
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Holly Construction Response (4137 : North Village Fire Substation Project Bid Award)

8.C.e
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Holly Construction Response (4137 : North Village Fire Substation Project Bid Award)

8.C.e
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Holly Construction Response (4137 : North Village Fire Substation Project Bid Award)

8.C.e
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Holly Construction Response (4137 : North Village Fire Substation Project Bid Award)

8.C.e
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Holly Construction Response (4137 : North Village Fire Substation Project Bid Award) 8/16/2023 – Page 1

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
(NOTE: The schedule is tentative and subject to change pending final publication and posting of the City Council meeting agenda) September 5, 2023 Employee Anniversaries – Ruben Mandujano – 45 years, Luis Rodriguez – 20 years (Tuesday) Priority Development Area
Acceptance of the Community Development Block Grant Curb Ramp Improvements Project YWCA Preschool Lease Agreement
2022 Power Source Disclosure Report
Grant Award for Pedestrian Enhancements at Powell and Johnson Review Draft Climate Mobilization Strategy
L&M Village Quarterly Update
Housing Element Work Group Reorganization and Professional Services Agreement for Housing Needs Assessment
Special Performance Policy for the Healdsburg Plaza
Professional Services Agreement with BKF Engineers for Design Services for Healdsburg Avenue Healdsburg Wine and Food Agreement
155 Dry Creek Disposition and Development Agreement
September 18, 2023 Cultural Trust Fund Amendment
Vehicle Miles Traveled Policy
Downtown Housing Capacity Study
October 2, 20223 Proclamation recognizing October 2-8, 2023 as International Active Aging Week Employee Anniversaries – Matt Milde – 5 years, Larry Unsworth – 5 years, Mack Montanye – 10 years, Frank Patane – 10 years, Mike Courts – 25 years, Christina Ramos – 40 years Amend Special Event Policy and Chapter 12.24 of Municipal Code Water and Wastewater Sales Forecast Consulting Agreement

13.1.a
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Agenda Planning Sheet (4155 : Future Agenda Items - August 21, 2023) 8/16/2023 – Page 2
Community Services Deferred Maintenance Plan
October 16, 2023 Proposed Adoption of Climate Mobilization Strategy Foley Family Community Pavilion Bid Award
November 6, 2023 Employee Anniversaries – Rosa Gutierrez – 20 years, Kenneth Damos-Deurloo – 5 years, Paul Fleckenstein – 35 years as a reserve firefighter
2024 Special Event Requests
Amend Special Event Policy and Chapter 12.24 of Municipal Code – 2nd reading November 20, 2023
2024 City Council Meeting Calendar
December 4, 2023 Employee Anniversaries – Rob Scates – 20 years, William Van Vleck – 10 years December 18, 2023 Selection of Mayor and Vice Mayor for 2024 Council appointments to Boards and Commissions for 2024 Local Appointments List – Maddy Act
(NOTE: The schedule is tentative and subject to change pending final publication and posting of the City Council meeting agenda)

13.1.a
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Agenda Planning Sheet (4155 : Future Agenda Items - August 21, 2023)