Healdsburg City Council
August 19, 2024

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
City Hall Council Chamber Meeting Date: August 19, 2024 401 Grove Street Time: 6:00 PM
Healdsburg, CA 95448 Date Posted: August 14, 2024
(707) 431-3317
To join by computer, tablet, or mobile device:

Go to https://zoom.us/join and type in the Webinar ID: 815 8894 3494 or follow this link:
healdsburg.gov/zoom (Pre-registration for the meeting is not required.) .

1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Approval of Agenda

2. REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION(S)

3. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
A. A Proclamation Recognizing the Contributions of Jennifer "Jendala" Utsch to the Healdsburg Community
B. A Proclamation Declaring August 26, 2024, As Women’s Equality Day in the City of Healdsburg

4. CITY MANAGER REPORTS

5. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR AND NON

AGENDA ITEMS
This time is set aside to receive comments from the public regarding matters of general interest not on the agenda, but related to City Council/RSA business. Pursuant to the Brown Act, however, the City Council cannot consider any issues or take action on any requests during this comment period. Public comment on non-agenda items is limited to thirty (30) minutes total for all speakers, with each speaker given no more than three (3) minutes. If there are more than ten (10) audience/public comment speakers, the Mayor may reduce each speaker’s time from three (3) minutes so that all speakers have an equal time to speak. At the Mayor’s discretion, the public comment period may be extended past 30 minutes. Members from the public wishing to speak on a Consent Agenda item should notify the Mayor during Public Comments.

6. CONSENT CALENDAR
The following items listed on the Consent Calendar are considered routine in nature or have been previously reviewed by the Council and require little or no further discussion by the Council, City Council/RSA Regular Meeting Agenda
August 19, 2024

public, or applicant and action will be taken by the City Council by a single motion. A Councilmember may request that an item be removed from the Consent Calendar and action taken separately. Consent by a majority of the Councilmembers present will be required in order to remove the item. In the event an item is removed, the matter will be considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Calendar.

A. Continued Operation of the Sonoma County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program
Adopt a Resolution supporting the extension of the Sonoma County Vehicle Abatement Authority until 2035.

B. Cooperative Agreement with Sonoma County Transportation Authority Adopt Resolution authorizing City Manager to execute a cooperative Agreement with Sonoma County Transportation Authority to complete an Engineering and Traffic Study and a Safe Routes to School Plan update through a Safe Streets for All Grant.

C. Updated Public Electric Vehicle Charging User Fees for City-Owned Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
Adopt a Resolution updating public electric vehicle charging user fees for city-owned Electric Vehicle (EV) charging stations through June 30, 2027.

7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.

8. OLD BUSINESS
A. Grove Street Neighborhood Plan Implementation (Complete Streets) Project Design Update
Receive a presentation on the proposed Grove Street Neighborhood Plan Implementation (Complete Streets) Project design and confirm Council support for proceeding with the final design.

B. Arts and Culture Commission Structure
Review a proposed structure for an Arts and Culture Commission and provide direction to staff.

9. NEW BUSINESS
A. Discussion on Formula Business Regulations in Downtown Healdsburg Discuss and provide direction on formula businesses in Downtown Healdsburg.

City Council/RSA Regular Meeting Agenda
August 19, 2024

10. COUNCIL REPORTS ON MATTERS OF INTEREST OCCURRING SINCE

PREVIOUS REGULAR MEETING/EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT REPORTS

11. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

12. ADJOURN CITY COUNCIL / RSA MEETING

13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
A. Future Agenda Items for 2024
SB 343 - DOCUMENTS RELATED TO OPEN SESSION AGENDAS: Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council/Redevelopment Successor Agency Board regarding any item on this agenda after the posting of this agenda and not otherwise exempt from disclosure, will be made available for public review in the City Clerk's Office located at City Hall, 401 Grove Street, Healdsburg, during normal business hours. If supplemental materials are made available to the members of the City Council/Redevelopment Successor Agency Board at the meeting, a copy will be available for public review at the City Hall Council Chambers, 401 Grove Street, Healdsburg, CA 95448.

These writings will be made available in appropriate alternative formats upon request by a person with a disability, as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act.

DISABLED ACCOMMODATIONS: The City of Healdsburg will make reasonable accommodations for persons having special needs due to disabilities. Please contact Raina Allan, City Clerk, at Healdsburg City Hall, 401 Grove Street, Healdsburg, California, 431-3317, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting, to ensure the necessary accommodations are made.

CIUDAD DE HEALDSBURG

CONSEJO MUNICIPAL/AGENCIA DE DESARROLLO SUCESORA
ORDEN DEL DÍA DE LA REUNIÓN ORDINARIA
Cámaras del Consejo Municipal Fecha de reunión: 19 de agosto de 2024 401 Grove Street Hora: 6:00 PM
Healdsburg, CA 95448 Fecha de publicación: 14 de agosto de 2024 (707) 431-3317
Para participar por computadora, tableta o dispositivo móvil:

Vaya a https://zoom.us/join y teclee el número de identificación (ID) del seminario web: 815 8894 3494 o siga este enlace: healdsburg.gov/zoom (No es necesario inscribirse previamente a la reunión).
.

1. LLAMADA AL ORDEN/PASAR LISTA
A. Juramento a la bandera
B. Aprobación del orden del día

2. INFORME SOBRE LA SESIÓN/LAS SESIONES A PUERTA CERRADA

3. ANUNCIOS/PRESENTACIONES
A. Proclamación de reconocimiento de las contribuciones de Jennifer «Jendala» Utch a la comunidad de Healdsburg
B. Proclamación que declara el 26 de agosto de 2024 como Día de la Igualdad de la Mujer en la ciudad de Healdsburg

4. INFORMES DEL GERENTE DE LA CIUDAD

5. COMENTARIOS PÚBLICOS SOBRE LOS PUNTOS EN EL CALENDARIO ACORDADO Y LOS PUNTOS NO INCLUIDOS EN EL ORDEN DEL DÍA
Este tiempo se reserva para recibir comentarios del público sobre asuntos de interés general no incluidos en el orden del día, pero relacionados con los asuntos del Consejo Municipal/RSA. Sin embargo, conforme la Ley Brown, el Consejo Municipal no puede considerar temas o tomar medidas sobre cualquier solicitud hecha durante este período de comentario. Los comentarios del público sobre los puntos no incluidos en el orden del día están limitados a treinta (30) minutos en total para todos los oradores, concediéndose a cada orador un máximo de tres (3) minutos. Si hay más de diez (10) comentarios públicos, el alcalde puede reducir el tiempo de tres (3) minutos de cada orador para que así todos los oradores tengan el mismo tiempo para hablar. A discreción del alcalde, el periodo de comentarios del público podrá prolongarse más de 30 minutos. Los miembros del público que deseen hablar sobre un asunto en el orden del día acordado deben notificárselo al alcalde durante los comentarios públicos.

Orden del día de la Reunión Ordinaria del Consejo Municipal /RSA 19 de agosto de 2024
Página 5

6. CALENDARIO ACORDADO
Los siguientes puntos enumerados en el orden del día acordado se consideran rutinarios o han sido revisados previamente por el Consejo y requieren poca o ninguna discusión por parte del Consejo, el público o solicitante y el Consejo Municipal tomará medidas en una sola moción. Un miembro del consejo puede solicitar que se excluya un punto del calendario acordado y se pueden tomar medidas por separado. Para excluir un punto, se requiere el consentimiento de una mayoría de los miembros del consejo presentes. En caso de que se excluya un punto, el asunto se considerará de inmediato después de la adopción del orden del día acordado.

A. Continuación del Programa de Reducción de Vehículos Abandonados del Condado de Sonoma
Adoptar una Resolución de apoyo a la prórroga de la Autoridad de Reducción de Vehículos del Condado de Sonoma hasta 2035.

B. Resolución por la que se autoriza al gerente de la Ciudad a firmar un acuerdo de cooperación con la Autoridad de Transporte del Condado de Sonoma para completar un estudio de ingeniería y tráfico y una actualización del Plan de Rutas Seguras a la Escuela a través de una Subvención de Calles Seguras para Todos Adoptar una Resolución por la que se autoriza al gerente de la Ciudad a firmar un acuerdo de cooperación con la Autoridad de Transporte del Condado de Sonoma para completar un estudio de ingeniería y tráfico y una actualización del Plan de Rutas Seguras a la Escuela a través de una Subvención de Calles Seguras para Todos.

C. Actualización de las tarifas de uso público de las estaciones de recarga de vehículos eléctricos propiedad de la Ciudad
Adoptar una Resolución que actualiza las tarifas de uso público de las estaciones de recarga de vehículos eléctricos (EV) propiedad de la Ciudad hasta el 30 de junio de 2027.

7. AUDIENCIAS PÚBLICAS
Ninguna.

8. ASUNTOS PENDIENTES
A. Actualización del diseño del Proyecto de implementación del plan vecinal de Grove Street (Calles Completas)
Recibir una presentación sobre el diseño propuesto del Proyecto de implementación del plan vecinal de Grove Street (Calles Completas) y confirmar el apoyo del Consejo para proceder con el diseño final.

Orden del día de la Reunión Ordinaria del Consejo Municipal /RSA 19 de agosto de 2024
Página 6
B. Comisión de Artes y Cultura
Revisar una estructura propuesta para la Comisión de Artes y Cultura y darle instrucciones al personal.

9. ASUNTOS NUEVOS
A. Debate sobre los negocios de fórmula en el centro
Debatir y proporcionar orientación sobre los negocios de fórmula en el centro de Healdsburg.

10. INFORMES DEL CONSEJO SOBRE ASUNTOS DE INTERÉS QUE HAN OCURRIDO DESDE LA REUNIÓN ORDINARIA ANTERIOR/INFORMES DE

REEMBOLSO DE GASTOS

11. COMUNICACIONES ESCRITAS

12. LEVANTAR LA REUNIÓN DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL/RSA

13. PUNTOS FUTUROS PARA EL ORDEN DEL DÍA
A. Futuros puntos del orden del día para 2024
SB 343 - DOCUMENTOS RELACIONADOS CON EL ÓRDEN DEL DÍA DE LAS SESIONES ABIERTAS: Cualquier escrito o documento provisto a una mayoría de la Junta del Consejo Municipal/Agencia de Desarrollo Sucesora con respecto a cualquier punto en este orden del día después de la publicación de la misma y que no esté exento de divulgación, se pondrá a disposición del público en la Oficina de la Secretaría Municipal ubicada en City Hall, 401 Grove Street, Healdsburg, durante horas hábiles. Si el material complementario se pone a disposición de los miembros de la Junta del Consejo Municipal/Agencia de Desarrollo Sucesora, una copia estará disponible para la revisión pública en las Cámaras del Consejo Municipal, 401 Grove Street, Healdsburg, CA 95448.

Estos escritos se pondrán a disposición en formatos alternativos apropiados a petición de una persona con discapacidad, tal y como exige la Ley de Estadounidenses con Discapacidades.

ADAPTACIONES POR DISCAPACIDAD: La ciudad de Healdsburg realizará adaptaciones razonables para las personas con necesidades especiales debidas a discapacidades. Por favor, contacte a Raina Allan, secretaria municipal, en Healdsburg City Hall, 401 Grove Street, Healdsburg, California, 431-3317, por lo menos 72 horas antes de la reunión para garantizar que se realicen las adaptaciones necesarias.

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

PROCLAMATION

A PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

HEALDSBURG CELEBRATING THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF
JENNIFER “JENDALA” UTSCH TO THE HEALDSBURG

COMMUNITY
WHEREAS, in 2004, Healdsburg welcomed a newcomer to the community from Tucson Arizona, Jennifer Utsch; and
WHEREAS, with her arrival in Healdsburg, Jennifer relocated her business fabricating metal affirmation artwork and chimes under the name Jendala; and WHEREAS, Jendala took form in November of 1998 after purchasing torches in Tucson, Arizona, where she worked as a Firefighter for Rural Metro Fire Department - it was the passion for the fire element that drew Jendala into its strength and beauty; and WHEREAS, Jendala's mission is to encourage a sustainable way of living for ourselves and our environment, to bridge diversity, expand our perceptions, and invoke emotions for selfdiscovery and wellbeing; and WHEREAS, Jendala artwork can be found inspiring people throughout the community, the state, the nation, and even the world with positive messages and inspiring words; and WHEREAS, Jennifer can be found regularly at the Tuesday and Saturday Farmers’ Market and throughout the Healdsburg community sharing her creativity, positivity, and passion for life; and
WHEREAS, over the past 20 years, the Jendala studio has transitioned to be more than a place to produce artwork, it has become a place of creativity for the community; and WHEREAS, Jennifer used her passion for art and creativity to empower children with the publishing of two children’s books “Wings to Fly” and “Shining with Resilience” that teach the fundamental tool of believing in yourself; and
WHEREAS, Jennifer furthered her work in supporting children by creating the non-profit Heartizens, the Heartizens Includitude Project, and Heartizens Street, a supportive space for kids to create connection with self and others through the arts, nature, and awareness; and WHEREAS, Jennifer has decided to make a life change and relocate back to Tucson where she has family and many friends; and
WHEREAS, Jennifer’s contributions to the Healdsburg community will carry-on long after she leaves.

3.A.a
Packet Pg. 7
Attachment: Proclamation (4568 : Proclamation Recognizing Jennifer "Jendala" Utsch) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that the City Council of the City of Healdsburg hereby expresses its sincere appreciation, thanks, and gratitude to Jennifer “Jendala” Utsch for sharing her creativity, positivity, and passion for life, and helping to make Healdsburg a better place.

DATED: August 19, 2024
SO ORDERED:
_____________________________________
David Hagele, Mayor

3.A.a
Packet Pg. 8
Attachment: Proclamation (4568 : Proclamation Recognizing Jennifer "Jendala" Utsch)

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

PROCLAMATION

A PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF HEALDSBURG DECLARING AUGUST 26, 2024, AS
WOMEN’S EQUALITY DAY IN THE CITY OF HEALDSBURG
WHEREAS, August 26, 2024, will mark the 104th1anniversary of the enactment of the 19th Amendment to the United States Constitution which secured the right to vote for women; and WHEREAS, in 1976, the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors established one of the first Commissions on the Status of Women in the State of California with the purpose of promoting “equal rights and opportunities that enhance the quality of life for all women and girls” and addressing “issues of discrimination and prejudice that negatively affect women in Sonoma County”; and
WHEREAS, women now constitute nearly 50 percent of our workforce, the majority of the students in our colleges and graduate schools, and an increasing number of primary breadwinners; and
WHEREAS, in 2023-2024, Sonoma County women working full time earned 86% of what men earned and those women working in agriculture and service areas earned even less; and WHEREAS, even with the gains women have made, work remains to be done in many areas that directly impact equal pay for equal work including access to quality affordable childcare, affordable housing and comprehensive healthcare for women, including reproductive and mental health care; and
WHEREAS, the mandate for Women’s Equality Day in 2024 is to “invest in women and girls to accelerate the progress” of our country.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that the City Council of the City of Healdsburg hereby declares August 26, 2024, as Women’s Equality Day, in the City of Healdsburg.

DATED: AUGUST 19, 2024
SO ORDERED:
_______________________________
David Hagele, Mayor

3.B.a
Packet Pg. 9
Attachment: Proclamation (4556 : Women's Equality Day Proclamation)

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 19, 2024
SUBJECT: Continued Operation of the Sonoma County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program
PREPARED BY: Matt Jenkins, Chief of Police
STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):

Provide Effective Governance
Maintain and Enhance Public Health and Safety
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Adopt a Resolution supporting the extension of the Sonoma County Vehicle Abatement Authority until 2035.

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:

Not applicable.

BACKGROUND:

Section 9250.7 and 22710 of the California Vehicle Code allow for the establishment of a service authority for Abandoned Vehicle Abatement (AVA) if the Board of Supervisors and a majority of the cities within the County having a majority of the population adopt resolutions providing for the establishment of the authority. In August 1994, the City Council approved resolution 63- 94, which requested that a service authority for abandoned vehicle abatement be established in Sonoma County.

In 1995, the Sonoma County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Authority was formed and imposed a one-dollar annual vehicle registration fee on vehicles registered to an owner with a Sonoma County address. Vehicle registration fees are collected by the Department of Motor Vehicles and allocated to the Sonoma County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority by the State Controller pursuant to 9250.7 VC. Fees are then allocated to ten participating entities on the basis of percentage of population and percentage of vehicles abated in relation to the total vehicles abated by the Sonoma County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Authority as a whole.

The City receives approximately $51.00 per vehicle abated under the AVA program.

6.A
Packet Pg. 10
In November 2004, the City Council passed Resolution No. 128-2004, authorizing the extension of the AVA Program through November 2015, and in August 2014, the City Council passed resolution 110-2014, authorizing the AVA program through April 2025.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

The current Sonoma County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program is set to expire on April 30, 2025. State legislation allows the local service authorities to extend the program every 10 years. To continue the Sonoma County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program, the County of Sonoma is requesting that a majority of the cities adopt resolutions agreeing to the continuation of the Authority.

It is staff’s recommendation that the City continue participation in the Sonoma County Vehicle Abatement Program.

ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:

Not applicable.

ALTERNATIVES:

City Council could choose not to adopt the resolution and consequently withdraw from the Sonoma County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program. This option is not recommended as this program provides important community benefits through the removal of abandoned vehicles.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Over the past 5 years, the City received an average of $8,000 per year from the Sonoma County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program, thus offsetting the costs of enforcing abandoned vehicles. Future revenues are expected to be similar. There is no on-going cost to the City to participate in the program.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

Pursuant to California Public Resources Code § 21065 and the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines § 15378, there is no possibility that this ordinance will have a significant impact on the physical environment and is not a project as defined under CEQA.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Resolution

6.A
Packet Pg. 11

CITY OF HEALDSBURG
RESOLUTION NO. -2024

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

HEALDSBURG SUPPORTING THE CONTINUED

OPERATION OF THE SONOMA COUNTY VEHICLE

ABATEMENT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the Sonoma County Vehicle Abatement Authority was formed in 1995; and WHEREAS, the Sonoma County Vehicle Abatement Authority program provides financial support for the abatement abandoned vehicles; and WHEREAS, the Sonoma County Vehicle Abatement Authority is set to expire in 2025; and
WHEREAS, State legislation allows for an extension of the program with the approval of the County and a majority of the cities comprising a majority of the population of the incorporated areas; and
WHEREAS, the City receives approximately $8,000 per year on average from the Sonoma County Vehicle Abatement Authority, offsetting costs of enforcing abandoned vehicles; and
WHEREAS, it is desirable to the City of Healdsburg to have the program continue.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Healdsburg hereby supports the extension of the Sonoma County Vehicle Abatement Authority until 2035.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Healdsburg, this 19 th day of August 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers: ( )
NOES: Councilmembers: ( )
ABSENT: Councilmembers: ( )
ABSTAINING: Councilmembers: ( )
SO ORDERED: ATTEST:
_________________________________ ____________________________________ David Hagele, Mayor Raina Allan, City Clerk

6.A.a
Packet Pg. 12
Attachment: Resolution (4537 : Abandoned Vehicle Abatement)

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 19, 2024
SUBJECT: Cooperative Agreement with Sonoma County Transportation Authority PREPARED BY: Michael Harrigan, Project Manager
STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):

Maintain and Enhance Public Health and Safety
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Adopt Resolution authorizing City Manager to execute a cooperative Agreement with Sonoma County Transportation Authority to complete an Engineering and Traffic Study and a Safe Routes to School Plan update through a Safe Streets for All Grant.

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:

In October 2019, the Sonoma County Transportation Authority (SCTA) launched a Vision Zero planning process in partnership with the Sonoma County Department of Health Services (DHS).

A Vision Zero Advisory Committee (VZAC) was convened, comprising members from all ten jurisdictions within Sonoma County, including the City of Healdsburg, non-profit organizations, community members, and public health and safety agencies. This Committee guided policy, provided local context, and shared the draft plan with their communities.

Extensive community engagement included two countywide surveys, three focus groups, a community workshop, and thirty-seven stakeholder interviews involving local jurisdictions, transportation agencies, community organizations, and law enforcement. The first survey, launched in July 2020, yielded 988 responses, while the second survey in September 2021 provided 2,479 responses. Surveys in both English and Spanish were shared widely via email and social media. VZAC members, including Healdsburg, shared the surveys on their respective city websites. The Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition shared the surveys with its members, and Safe Routes to School (SRTS) shared their school contact list with DHS staff, who sent the surveys to all participating schools.

Findings from the surveys, focus groups, and interviews were incorporated into the Draft Action Plan, presented for discussion and input at a public workshop held virtually on January 25, 2022.

6.B
Packet Pg. 13
After months of data-gathering, agency participation, community engagement, and plan development, the Vision Zero Advisory Committee produced the Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan.

BACKGROUND:

Sonoma County jurisdictions have collaborated to prioritize surface transportation safety and aim to end traffic deaths by 2030 as part of the Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan (VZAP).

Adopted by the City of Healdsburg on May 16, 2022, the VZAP outlines six high-level goals and actions to improve safety and help achieve the Vision Zero goal. One goal is to “Create Safer Speeds” by reviewing speeds and posted limits on the High Injury Network, setting contextappropriate speeds, and implementing speed mitigation measures. Another goal is to “Create a Culture of Safety,” partially through supporting the Safe Routes to School (SRTS) program.

Assembly Bill 43 (AB 43), signed by Governor Newsom in October 2021, supports these efforts by allowing local governments to lower speed limits on roads, including state highways, in business and residential areas, and other stretches identified as “safety corridors,” without following the “85th percentile rule.” The 85th percentile rule, which required traffic engineers to set speed limits based on the speed at which 85 percent of cars travel, often resulted in increased speed limits. AB 43 enables local authorities to reduce speed limits by five miles per hour and set limits of 20 to 25 mph in business districts to reduce traffic fatalities, particularly among pedestrians.

Under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), the Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) program provides financial support for planning, infrastructure, behavioral, and operational initiatives to prevent death and serious injury on roads and streets involving all roadway users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, public transportation users and operators, personal conveyance, micromobility users, motorists, and commercial vehicle operators. The SS4A program supports the development of comprehensive safety action plans that identify the most significant roadway safety concerns in a community and the implementation of projects and strategies to address roadway safety issues. The SS4A program provides funding for two types of grants: Planning and Demonstration Grants and Implementation Grants. Eligible uses of Planning and Demonstration Grants include activities such as goal setting, safety analyses, equity representation, policy and process improvement, strategic planning, and demonstration activities.

On July 10, 2023, the City of Healdsburg participated in a joint application with the Sonoma County Transportation Authority (SCTA) to submit to the US Department of Transportation for the SS4A grant program. This application proposed a Safe Routes to School Plan update and the Engineering and Traffic Study (to reduce speed limits) for consideration.

On December 13, the U.S. Department of Transportation announced $817 million in SS4A grants. The SCTA, in partnership with jurisdictional partners including Healdsburg, has been awarded $1,060,000 for Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning Projects. Of this amount, $60,000 will go to an Engineering and Traffic Study, and $75,000 will go to the Safe Routes to School Plan Update for the City of Healdsburg. A Request for Proposals (RFP) to provide Project Development Services for the Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning was issued on July 24, 2024. Consultant applicants will be notified of

6.B
Packet Pg. 14
selection on October 18, 2024, with a project launch on November 18, 2024. Project completion is expected by June 30, 2027.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

The Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan (VZAP) outlines prioritized actions across six major goals. Goal 3, “Create a Culture of Safety,” involves encouraging safe behavior and instilling a shared responsibility for safety. This goal targets dangerous behaviors such as impaired driving, unsafe turns, unsafe speed, and right-of-way violations. A primary action is to support the Safe Routes to School (SRTS) program to promote safe, active transportation through education and school policies. Updating the SRTS plan is necessary as there is currently no funding for its implementation. The plan serves as a reference for development and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects near schools and supports future grant applications for implementation funding. The updated plan will build on existing SRTS program priorities, expanding to additional schools and improving pick-up/drop-off procedures to eliminate double parking, stopping on crosswalks, and loading/unloading children at locations across the street from schools.

The City of Healdsburg will collaborate closely with the Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition-led Sonoma County Safe Routes to School program and other stakeholders to update the current SRTS Plan. This update aims to create a comprehensive, data-driven, and project deliverycentric SRTS Plan that will direct infrastructure and non-infrastructure resources to school neighborhoods with the highest need. The plan will enhance the existing SRTS Ranked List of Schools by prioritizing based on traffic safety, student proximity to schools, socioeconomic factors, and climate safety. It will develop and execute a school-specific SRTS Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP) strategy to address safety concerns and barriers for students using human-powered modes of travel. This will involve a community-centered planning process and a safety countermeasures toolbox to support the development of IIPs for each ranked school. The plan will prepare grant-ready plans that include engineering recommendations, cost estimates, data and metrics for pre- and post-project evaluation, documentation of prior grants awarded, community engagement records, and GIS-based representations of the IIPs. It will also expand safety education and encouragement activities to all elementary, middle, and high school students.

Goal 1 of the VZAP, “Create Safer Speeds,” involves reviewing speeds and posted limits on the High Injury Network, setting context-appropriate speeds, and implementing speed mitigation measures. The Speed Limit Reduction and Engineering Traffic Study will accomplish the first two steps, informed by the provisions of AB 43. This study will leverage resources such as the UC Berkeley SafeTREC toolkit to examine and implement these provisions.

The project will produce a countywide best practices guidebook to implement AB43, speed limit review, and reduction planning and implementation. In collaboration with SCTA, City of Healdsburg staff, and various advisory committees, the guidebook will include an introduction and background on current speed limit policies and the benefits of speed limit reviews and reductions, an overview of AB43 requirements and implementation, including a literature review of local implementation examples, recommendations on applying AB 43 in Sonoma County, including technical recommendations and public messaging, and best practices for considering

6.B
Packet Pg. 15
actions identified in the VZAP and Local Road Safety Plans, with attention to the High Injury Network, High Injury Intersections, and crash/collision data. Leveraging this countywide effort, an engineering and traffic survey specific to Healdsburg will be completed. This will include a downtown corridor study to explore opportunities for reducing speed limits to 20MPH and develop technical analysis/guidance for potential speed reductions on other city corridors to create safer conditions for vulnerable road users such as bicyclists and pedestrians.

Both projects support the Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan, the City of Healdsburg’s Local Road Safety Plan, and numerous General Plan goals, including reducing traffic accidents and hazards, providing safe bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities, and reducing greenhouse gases. The implementation of these planning projects bolsters the City’s ongoing efforts to provide safe and equitable transportation options for all, ensuring that these priorities continue to be upheld moving forward.

ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:

The proposed action will have no negative environmental impacts. Policies and measures in the Vision Zero Action Plan will support a reduction in vehicle miles traveled, dependence on single-occupancy vehicle trips, and vehicle speeds, all contributing to lower greenhouse gas emissions.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council may choose not to authorize the City Manager to execute a cooperative Agreement with Sonoma County Transportation Authority to complete an Engineering and Traffic Study and a Safe Routes to School Plan update through a Safe Streets for All Grant.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The proposed Cooperative Funding Agreement authorizes the Sonoma County Transportation Authority to manage the grant funding agreements with the Federal Highway Administration and manage the consultant contracts associated with the completion of the Healdsburg SS4A project.

The SS4A grant program awarded a total of $108,000 in federal funds to the Healdsburg projects and requires a non-federal local match of $27,000. The Cooperative Funding Agreement requires the City to provide the matching funds directly to the SCTA upon execution. Upon project closeout the SCTA will provide the City a copy of all receipts for the matching funds and return any used funds. There are sufficient appropriations within the adopted streets operating fund budget to reallocate towards the proposed SS4A project.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

This action does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines Section 15378 and is also exempt under CEQA Guidelines 15262 (planning or feasibility studies). Therefore, no environmental review is required.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Resolution
SCTA Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning RFP
Cooperative Funding Agreement SCTA24025

6.B
Packet Pg. 16

CITY OF HEALDSBURG
RESOLUTION NO. - 2024

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

HEALDSBURG AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE A COOPERATIVE FUNDING AGREEMENT WITH

THE SONOMA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) established the Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) program, providing financial support for planning, infrastructure, behavioral, and operational initiatives to prevent death and serious injury on roads involving all roadway users; and
WHEREAS, the Safe Streets for All (SS4A) program supports the development of comprehensive safety action plans and the implementation of projects and strategies to address roadway safety issues, with funding for Planning and Demonstration Grants and Implementation Grants; and
WHEREAS, the City of Healdsburg adopted the Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan on May 16, 2022, which outlines six high -level goals and actions to improve safety and help achieve the Vision Zero goal, including creating safer speeds and a culture of safety; and WHEREAS, the City of Healdsburg participated in a joint application with Sonoma County Transportation Authority (SCTA) to submit to the US Department of Transportation on July 10, 2023, for the SS4A grant program, proposing that a portion of the grant funds be used in Healdsburg for a Safe Routes to School (SRTS) update and Engineering and Traffic Study ; and WHEREAS, implementation of these planning projects supports the Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan and bolsters the City’s ongoing efforts to provide safe and equitable transportation options for all, ensuring that these priorities continue to be upheld moving forward; and
WHEREAS, on December 13, 2023, the U.S. Department of Transportation awarded SCTA $1,060,000 for Sonoma County Vision Zero Supplemental Planning projects, including Sixty Thousand ($60,000) for the Engineering and Traffic Study and Seventy-Five Thousand ($75,000) for the Safe Routes to School Plan Update for the City of Healdsburg; and WHEREAS, the City of Healdsburg is willing to contribute Twenty-Seven Thousand ($27,000) as local match for the federal SS4A funding.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Healdsburg hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute Cooperative Funding Agreement No. SCTA24025 with the Sonoma County Transportation Authority, which enables a portion of SS4A Grant funds to be used to complete an Engineering and Traffic Study and a Safe Routes to School Plan Update for Healdsburg.

6.B.a
Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: Resolution (4560 : Sonoma County Transportation Authority - Safe Streets for All Planning Projects) Resolution No. – 2024

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Healdsburg this 19th day of August 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers: ( )
NOES: Councilmembers: ( )
ABSENT: Councilmembers: ( )
ABSTAINING: Councilmembers: ( )
SO ORDERED: ATTEST:
_________________________________ ___________________________________ David Hagele, Mayor Raina Allan, City Clerk

6.B.a
Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: Resolution (4560 : Sonoma County Transportation Authority - Safe Streets for All Planning Projects) SCTA RFP 23001-A-06
Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning 1 of 13 Request for Proposals
from
Pre-Qualified Consultants
from the On-Call List
Established under RFQ 23001
to provide
Project Development Services
for
Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan
Supplemental Planning
RFP Issued On: July 24, 2024
Electronic Proposals Due: September 16, 2024, at 4:00 p.m.

Contact:

Margot Ocañas
Senior Transportation Planner
Phone: 707-565-5374
Email: [email protected]

6.B.b
Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: SCTA Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning RFP (4560 : Sonoma County Transportation Authority - Safe Streets for All SCTA RFP 23001-A-06
Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning 2 of 13

1. Project Background

1.1 Introduction
The Sonoma County Transportation Authority (SCTA), created in 1990, is governed by a twelvemember Board of Directors representing the ten local jurisdictions in the county – Cloverdale, Cotati, Healdsburg, Petaluma, Rohnert Park, Santa Rosa, Sebastopol, Sonoma, Windsor, and the County of Sonoma. The SCTA acts as the countywide transportation planning and funding agency and performs a variety of important functions such as advocacy, project management, planning, finance, grant administration, and research.

SCTA is soliciting proposals from pre-qualified Consultants on the on-call list established under RFQ 23001 for a Task Order to provide consultant services to prepare supplemental planning activities to help implement the Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan. These Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) funded supplemental planning activities are foundational steps to help achieve the countywide goals of the Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan (VZAP).

The VZAP, adopted in March 2022, was a collaborative effort led by SCTA, the Sonoma County Department of Health Services, and the Sonoma County Vision Zero Advisory Committee (VZAC) which includes local cities and towns, law enforcement, health care providers, climate change leaders, and advocacy groups. The VZAP focuses on six high-level goals including: creating safe speeds, creating a culture of safety, building safe streets for all, making vehicles safer, reducing private vehicle use, eliminating impaired driving, and improving data for effective decision making with the goal of reducing Sonoma County’s fatal and serious injury crashes per capita which is higher than any other county in the San Francisco Bay Area.

SCTA seeks consultant services to complete the following supplemental planning activities:

1. Safe Routes to School Planning
o Prepare an updated City of Healdsburg Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Plan. o Leverage the updated City of Healdsburg SRTS Plan as a blueprint to develop a countywide SRTS Plan that will consider countywide crash data analysis to inform a schools neighborhood prioritization and school community-centered planning to identify strategies to address safety issues to create a safer bicycle and pedestrian-friendly Sonoma County.

2. Speed Limit Reduction and Engineering and Traffic Studies o Complete a countywide Speed Limit Review and Reduction Study that leverages resources including the UC Berkeley SafeTREC toolkit to inform an examination of provisions outlined in California Assembly Bill 43 (AB43) that allows local authorities to lower speed limits beyond traditional principles to protect vulnerable groups and create safer road conditions.
o For the City of Healdsburg, prepare a targeted Engineering and Traffic Study, informed by the Speed Limit Reduction Study.

3. Lakeville Corridor Multi-Modal Improvements Study
o Conduct a multimodal improvements study for the Lakeville Street/Lakeville Highway (State Route 116) corridor within the Petaluma city limits.

6.B.b
Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: SCTA Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning RFP (4560 : Sonoma County Transportation Authority - Safe Streets for All SCTA RFP 23001-A-06
Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning 3 of 13

4. Vision Zero Data Dashboard Enhancements and Automated Progress Tracking o Support SCTA staff on an as-needed basis to improve the breadth and depth of data, functionality, and usability of the Sonoma County Vision Zero Data Dashboard. In addition, automate the progress tracking and reporting process of Vision Zero objectives and goals.

Additional supporting materials are included in Attachments A through J.

Consultants intending to submit proposals should note the schedule contained in Section 3. It is the intention of SCTA, subject to Board approval, to have the selected Consultant(s) under contract by November 18, 2024. The anticipated budget for this Task Order is anticipated to be approximately $950,000. In the event the Task Order must be supported by technical assistance not found on the team as approved under the established on-call list, the Consultant may use additional Sub-Consultant services. However formal review of the qualifications, references, and rates of that new Sub-Consultant must be provided to the SCTA Executive Director and approved in writing and in advance of the Task Order Notice to Proceed.

1.2 Scope of Services
The Consultant will be responsible for the necessary outreach/engagement, infrastructure planning and design, geometric and civil engineering and landscape architecture analysis and recommended services to complete the supplemental planning activities.Proposers are welcome to suggest other optional services they deem appropriate during the contract period. The Consultant shall also provide all the necessary project coordination, administration, management, and interfacing with SCTA, FHWA, Caltrans, and other stakeholders to achieve project objective with proper quality assurance and quality control.

Upon issuance of a Task Order, a kick-off meeting will be held for the introduction of staff, roles and responsibilities, establishment of communication channels, refinement of the work plan and schedule, and discussion of other relevant issues. The final work scope will be a guide for all tasks conducted. The Consultant will work directly under the supervision of SCTA and will coordinate closely with SCTA on project management and administration. The Consultant will coordinate with SCTA on work elements. The Consultant will manage and coordinate all work elements and provide a single point of contact with SCTA. Coordination may include regular calls with SCTA and at a minimum, monthly project meetings will be held for the review of Task Order status and the determination of needed actions. The Consultant shall prepare all meeting notices, agendas, and minutes.

Deliverables for supplemental planning activities will include but not be limited to the following:

1. Safe Route to School Planning
City of Healdsburg SRTS Plan Update
• In close collaboration with the Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition-led Sonoma County Safe Routes to School program and other stakeholders, update the current City of Healdsburg SRTS Plan to create a comprehensive, data-driven and project delivery-centric City of Healdsburg SRTS Plan, providing a roadmap to direct infrastructure and noninfrastructure resources to school neighborhoods of highest need.

6.B.b
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: SCTA Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning RFP (4560 : Sonoma County Transportation Authority - Safe Streets for All SCTA RFP 23001-A-06
Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning 4 of 13 o Build off the city’s existing SRTS Ranked List of Schools prioritization to enhance a rank ordering that considers but is not limited to traffic safety, student proximity to schools, socioeconomic, and climate safety.
o Develop and execute a school-specific SRTS Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP) strategy to develop short- and long-term infrastructure solutions to address safety concerns and barriers for students/families using human-powered modes to travel to/from school. Prepare and launch a school community-centered planning process and safety countermeasures toolbox to support the development of IIPs for each of the city’s SRTS Ranked Schools. IIPs will build off and help achieve the objectives and goals of existing, adopted city and county long range plans and policies. IIPs will be grant-ready plans that contain (1) feasible, city-approved engineering recommendations and cost estimates for infrastructure (and noninfrastructure needs, to the degree possible); (2) data and metrics for pre and post project evaluation; (3) documentation of prior grants awarded; and (4) documentation of community engagement and outreach; and, (5) GIS-based representation of the IIPs.
o Tap the Sonoma County SRTS’ resources to expand safety education and encouragement materials and activities to all elementary, middle, and high school students.

Countywide Safe Routes to School Plan
• In close collaboration with the Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition-led Sonoma County Safe Routes to School program and other stakeholders, leverage the afore-detailed updated City of Healdsburg SRTS Plan as model to develop and launch a CountywideSRTS Plan. o Create a policy framework inclusive of goals, objectives, and programs for a countywide SRTS IIP that will help achieve the desired outcomes of adopted county, city, and school district plans. Develop a strategy to take advantage of all potential transportation or non-transportation funding sources to prepare and implement the countywide and city SRTS Plan elements.
o Develop a County SRTS Ranked List of Schools prioritization methodology that appropriately considers school distribution across the county, 40 school districts, and jurisdictions. Indicators may include but not be limited to traffic safety, bicycle/pedestrian level of stress, student proximity to schools, socioeconomic, and climate safety. Build off and bolster the existing Sonoma County SRTS breadth of task forces to enhance and/or scale task forces that include key partners, including county and city agencies, school districts, Friends of and PTA groups, CBOs, community organizations, and other interested persons/stakeholders to improve coordination and communications, and bolster in-school program support.
o Develop and execute a school-specific SRTS Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP) strategy to develop short- and long-term infrastructure solutions to address safety concerns and barriers for students/families using human-powered modes to travel to/from school. Prepare and launch a school community-centered planning process and safety countermeasures toolbox to support the development of IIPs for each of the city’s SRTS Ranked Schools. IIPs will build off and help achieve the objectives and goals of existing, adopted city and county long range plans and policies. IIPs will be grant-ready plans that contain (1) feasible, city-approved

6.B.b
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: SCTA Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning RFP (4560 : Sonoma County Transportation Authority - Safe Streets for All SCTA RFP 23001-A-06
Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning 5 of 13 engineering recommendations and cost estimates for infrastructure (and noninfrastructure needs, to the degree possible); (2) data and metrics for pre and post project evaluation; (3) documentation of prior grants awarded; and (4) documentation of community engagement and outreach; and, (5) GIS-based representation of the IIPs.
o Amplify Sonoma County SRTS’ resources to include safety education and encouragement materials and activities that are proven to be meaningful and impactful for all school-aged students, serving elementary, middle, and high school students. Bolster the existing online resource to support parents, teachers, school administration, and community groups who will seek to to access materials and host activities at their schools.
o Organize staff resources and work procedures to ensure successful funding applications and cost-effective and timely delivery of projects.  Evaluate, align and organize capacity resources to increase efficiency and effectiveness in developing, funding, and implementing SRTS projects and programs, especially in the larger context of adopted mobility and climate protection policies. Enhance collaboration on planning, grant applications, and implementation with an emphasis on human-powered modes, and transit.
o Prepare GIS-based data and an online visualization tool to easily identify and track IIP proposed recommendations with other projects, programs, and opportunities.

2. Speed Limit Reduction and Engineering and Traffic Studies • Produce a countywide best practices and guidebook, in collaboration with SCTA /City of Healdsburg staff and advised by the Vision Zero Advisory Committee, SCTA Technical Advisory Committee, and local Public Works Departments, to implement AB43, and speed limit review and reduction planning and implementation. The guidebook shall include but not be limited to:
o Introduction and Background on Current State of Practice (speed limit policy and implementation) and benefits of speed limit review and potential reductions and/or revisions. The UC Berkeley SafeTREC Safe Speeds Toolkit may be used as a reference.
o Overview of AB43 Requirements and Implementation including literature review covering examples of local implementation.
o Recommendations on applying AB 43 in Sonoma County and may include technical recommendations and marketing/public messaging. o Best practices guide should consider actions identified in the VZAP and Local Road Safety Plans and consider High Injury Network, High Injury Intersections, and crash/collision data.
• Leverage the aforementioned countywide effort, to complete an engineering and traffic survey specific to the City Healdsburg. Specifically, using AB43, the Consultant will prepare a downtown corridor study to determine if and/or where there are opportunities to reduce speed limits to 20MPH, and develop technical analysis / guidance to assess potential speed reductions along for other corridors within the city. to create safer road conditions for vulnerable road user’s such as bicyclists and pedestrians.

6.B.b
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: SCTA Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning RFP (4560 : Sonoma County Transportation Authority - Safe Streets for All SCTA RFP 23001-A-06
Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning 6 of 13

3. Lakeville Corridor Multi-Modal Improvements Study
The Lakeville Highway (State Route 116)/Lakeville Street corridor has a history of collisions.

The Lakeville Corridor Multi-Modal Improvements Study builds on work compiled through the development of the Sonoma County VZAP. This study would examine existing conditions, engage the community and relevant partner agencies, and develop near, mid, and long-term recommendations to improve safety and connectivity for all modes of travel. The study would include detailed recommendations to improve safety, accessibility, and connectivity along and across the Lakeville corridor, as well as nearby parallel alternatives with lower traffic exposure for people traveling by foot and bike. Implementation strategies will be included for each recommendation to identify agency roles and assist with funding/implementation effort.

The Lakeville corridor is included in the VZAP High-Injury Network and was identified as a priority in the City’s Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) due to a high frequency and severity of collisions. In Petaluma from 2018-22, 14 percent of all reported collisions and 19 percent of all reported collisions resulting in a severe injury or death occurred along the Lakeville corridor. The City of Petaluma was recently awarded funding to complete an early assessment of the corridor, which is currently being prepared by Alta Planning + Design under contract to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission. The content being prepared by Alta will be provided to the consultant to help inform this study.

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the California Highway Patrol (CHP) led a safety working group of first responders, Caltrans, City of Petaluma, Sonoma County, and SCTA staff for the State Route 116 (SR 116) Lakeville Highway corridor. In response to the work done by the group, Caltrans initiated a project to construct a roundabout at the intersection of SR 116 and Stage Gulch Road, which is anticipated to begin construction in 2025. The safety working group ceased meeting during the pandemic, but in response to a collision on Lakeville Road in November 2023 and continued advocacy from City of Petaluma staff to examine the SR 116/Pine View Way intersection in Petaluma, Caltrans reformed the safety working group in January 2024. On January 31st, the safety working group met to discuss improvements in the SR 116 Lakeville Corridor, including at the Pine View Way intersection. On February 1st a motorist making a left turn from Pine View Way onto westbound SR 116 was struck by a vehicle traveling eastbound resulting in a fatal collision. The safety working group immediately met again on February 1st and 2nd to discuss the collision and how to accelerate improvements at Pine View Way and throughout the corridor.

Subsequently, the City of Petaluma installed temporary barriers to close off access from McDowell Blvd Extension and Pine View Way preventing left and right turns from the side streets to SR 116.

Access from SR 116 to both streets is still available.

Caltrans District 4 subsequently issued a District Director’s Order to modify the striping of eastbound SR 116 between Frates Road and Pine View Way to match the new lane configuration and install channelizers to prevent illegal passing movements. This was done as part of a change order to a rumble strip project that was in construction under EA 04-2W040. Caltrans District 4 has initiated a project initiation document (PID) to install a roundabout or traffic signal at the SR 116/Pine View Way intersection as a Reactive Safety SHOPP Project under EA 04-1X790. It is hoped that this PID will be completed within twelve months and will allow the project to be delivered in an expedited manner. However, this PID does not address the SR 116/McDowell

6.B.b
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: SCTA Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning RFP (4560 : Sonoma County Transportation Authority - Safe Streets for All SCTA RFP 23001-A-06
Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning 7 of 13 Blvd Extension intersection as the collision history at that intersection does not meet SHOPP reactive safety project eligibility guidelines.

In addition, Caltrans has a SHOPP Capitalized Maintenance (CAPM) project on SR 116 between US 101 and Stage Gulch Road under EA 04-4G900 that is currently beginning the PA&ED phase.

This project would include providing green painted Class II bike lanes on SR 116 in Petaluma, in addition to closing a sidewalk gap on the south side of SR 116 between Baywood Drive and Casa Grande Road.

The Lakeville Corridor Multi-Modal Improvements Study will include, but not be limited to, the following activities:
• Examine existing conditions and engage the community and relevant partner agencies to develop feasible near, mid, and long-term recommendations and cost estimates to improve safety, accessibility, and connectivity for all modes of travel along and across the Lakeville corridor in both City and Caltrans right of way, and nearby parallel routes to lower traffic exposure for people using human-powered modes of travel. • Prepare and finalize strategies to implement the full suite of recommendations that identify agency roles and potential sources to fund implementation.

4. Vision Zero Data Dashboard Enhancements and Automated Progress Tracking The customizable Sonoma County Vision Zero Data Dashboard (and the ArcGIS narrative story map) visualizes trends and cross-sections of crash data from 2012-2023. The Contractor will be responsible for, but not limited to, assisting SCTA staff on an as-needed basis with the following activities:
• Investigate, source and integrate additional crash and safety data to the dashboard, especially innovative and near real-time sources of information to 1) help fill gaps due to the underreporting of crashes. Data that could include health service provider, regional data sources (e.g. MTC’s Regional High Injury Network and Caltrans District 4 locationbased needs), annual citations for infractions that potentially lead to severe injuries and deaths, impaired driving, speeding, and failure to yield. • Refine and enhance the dashboard on the Vision Zero website to increase its usability and optimize the summary of safety and other data, providing better support for countywide and local project work.
• Work with SCTA/RCPA staff and the VZAC, and leverage draft progress metrics identified for the VZAP goals to 1) help identify data sources and 2) support the streamlining and automating of data collection and reporting that demonstrates progress being made in achieving each of the VZAP goals and objectives. Once project tracking metrics have been identified and vetted by the VZAC, work with SCTA/RCPA staff to streamline data collection and reporting for each of these metrics.
• Create and launch automated process and enhanced functionality within the dashboard to allow jurisdictions to generate one-page progress reports and for SCTA to prepare report cards and narrative Story Map to track and report on the progress of the Vision Zero Action Plan.

6.B.b
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: SCTA Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning RFP (4560 : Sonoma County Transportation Authority - Safe Streets for All SCTA RFP 23001-A-06
Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning 8 of 13

2. Pre-Proposal Questions
Questions regarding this RFP must be submitted in writing via e-mail to Margot Ocañas at [email protected] by August 28, 2024. Questions and answers will be provided no later than August 30, 2024.

3. Task Order Solicitation Schedule
The Task Order Solicitation activities are as follows:

Activities Owner Due Date
RFP Release SCTA July 24 ,2024
Submit Written Questions Consultant August 28, 2024
Release Written Question Responses SCTA August 30, 2024 Submit Proposals Consultant September 16, 2024
Review Proposals SCTA September 17 – 27, 2024
Release Short-List of Firms SCTA September 30, 2024
Interview Short-Listed Firms (if needed) SCTA Week of October 14, 2024 Notify Firms of Selection Ranking SCTA October 18, 2024 Negotiate Task Order SCTA/Consultant October 18 - November 1, 2024
SCTA Board Approval of Task Order SCTA November 18, 2024 Project Launch SCTA/Consultant November 19, 2024
Task Order Completion Consultant June 30, 2027

4. Consultant Selection Process
All proposals shall be evaluated and scored in accordance with the Evaluation and Selection Criteria (see Section 5). SCTA staff will review written proposals with input from other professionals to determine a competitive short-list ranking of the submitted proposals.

Short-listed proposers may be asked to attend an oral interview at the discretion of SCTA. Oral interviews will be held with all firms ranked within the competitive range at the discretion of SCTA.When the short-listed firms are notified, the SCTA may request additional clarifying information to be provided either in writing or via the oral presentation. An oral presentation will be required of all short-listed firms, followed by questions from the selection panel. The Consultant’s individuals in charge of the project will make the oral presentation and include key personnel staff of the Consultant and proposed Sub-Consultant firm(s).

The highest-ranking proposer, identified using the Proposal Evaluation and Selection Criteria, will be selected to negotiate with the SCTA in advance of entering a Task Order that includes the comprehensive scope of services. If the negotiations do not result in an agreement with a selected firm, SCTA reserves the right to enter into negotiations with the other qualified firms in the order of their ranking.

6.B.b
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: SCTA Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning RFP (4560 : Sonoma County Transportation Authority - Safe Streets for All SCTA RFP 23001-A-06
Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning 9 of 13 The SCTA reserves the right to:
• Negotiate with any proposer and to reject any or all proposals for anyreason, • Withhold consideration of incomplete proposals,
• Waive informalities or any irregularity,
• Request additional information of proposers at its discretion, and • Terminate the Task Order Solicitation and/or evaluation process at any time.

While the SCTA consultant selection process for this RFP does not have a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) goal, using DBE contractors as subconsultants is encouraged.

The issuance of this solicitation does not constitute an award commitment on the part of the SCTA, and the SCTA shall not pay for costs incurred in the preparation or submission of proposals. All costs and expenses associated with the preparation of this proposal shall be borne by the proposer. Acceptance of a proposal or other material during the selection process does not constitute a contract and does not obligate the SCTA to award funds. Funding is subject to final contract approval by the SCTA Board. SCTA also reserves the right to reject any or all responses without penalty and to act in the best interest of the SCTA. The SCTA shall not be liable for any precontractual expenses incurred by the proposer or selected contractor or contractors. The SCTA shall be held harmless and free from any and all liability, claims, or expenses whatsoever incurred by, or on behalf of, any person or firm responding to this RFP.

5. Proposal Evaluation and Selection Criteria
Evaluation and Selection Criteria Max Points
Understanding of Project Requirements

1. Clarity of submittal and responsiveness to RFP demonstrating a genera understanding of the services needed and applicable State and Federa guidelines.
25 Technical Qualifications & Experience of Firm

1. Capability to provide professional and technical services required.

2. Ability to demonstrate previous experience in the areas listed in the Scope of Services.

3. Record of performance and demonstrated competence as specified in the Scope of Services.

4. Demonstrated capability of the consultant to provide timely response to required task orders.
20 Technical Qualifications & Experience of Project Manage and Key Staf

1. Extent of applicable experience relative to the scope of work.

2. Length of experience.

3. Previous experience to demonstrate capability to successfully manage work.
25 Project Approach

1. Proposed organizational approach, work plan, project management and project controls set forth by the consultant 30

6.B.b
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: SCTA Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning RFP (4560 : Sonoma County Transportation Authority - Safe Streets for All SCTA RFP 23001-A-06
Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning 10 of 13

6. Proposal Content and Organization
Please prepare your proposal in accordance with the following requirements.

6.1 Submittal
The submittal (excluding resumes and the transmittal letter) shall not exceed a total of the equivalent of 25 single-sided, 8.5” x 11” pages. The staffing plan, organizational chart, and any conceptual graphics may be submitted on 11” x 17” pages, which will count as one (1) of the allotted 25 equivalent single-sided pages. Covers, Transmittal Letter, tables of contents, and any divider pages are not part of the 25-page limit. Font size shall be at least 10 point, however 9- point size font for graphics, tables, or similar materials is acceptable. Resumes should be included in an appendix and are limited to two (2) pages per resume. Appendices are limited to 30 singlesided pages.

1. Transmittal Letter
The Transmittal Letter shall include the following information:
• Proposer name, address, telephone, and e-mail address of key contact person; and • Written statement warranting the acceptance of all requirements of the Project as described in this RFP and acknowledging receipt of all addenda and dates received, and • A written statement acknowledging the validity of the Proposals for a period of 120 calendar days after the submission deadline; and
• Signature of a person authorized to bind Proposer to the terms and conditions of the proposal.
• The Transmittal Letter shall be addressed to:

Margot Ocañas
Senior Transportation Planner
Sonoma County Transportation Authority
411 King Street, Santa Rosa, CA 95404

2. Firm Qualifications and Experience
This section should state the qualifications and previous experience of the consultant team on relevant projects. Please emphasize the specific experience from the relevant project for Key Team Members, including the role performed, whether the team member was part of the prime firm or a subconsultant team member, and when the project was completed or if it is ongoing. Key Team Members are expected to be committed for the duration of the project. Replacement of Key Team Members will not be permitted without prior consultation with and written approval from the SCTA.

3. Project Understanding and Approach
This section should demonstrate your firm/team’s understanding of the Task Order and the nature of work including coordination with and approvals from the SCTA. Provide the firm/team’s

6.B.b
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: SCTA Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning RFP (4560 : Sonoma County Transportation Authority - Safe Streets for All SCTA RFP 23001-A-06
Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning 11 of 13 proposed approach and management plan forproviding the services. Include an organization chart showing the proposed relationships among consultant staff, other public agency staff,SCTA staff and any other parties that may have a significant role in the delivery of the supplemental planning activities.

4. Staffing Plan
This section should discuss the proposed staffing plan and provide an organizational chart.

Provide a list of the current projects for all Key Team Members and their percent availability to perform the requested services. For each Key Team Member please provide at least three references, including subconsultant Key Team Members. References may be listed within the Staffing Plan if the Consultant wishes to do so in their proposal (resumes for key personnel should be provided in the appendix).

5. Work Plan & Schedule
Include a description of how each major task of the Task Order will be conducted; identify level of effort and deliverables for each task and include Consultant’s overall strategy for scheduling work. The work plan must provide sufficient detail to demonstrate a clear understanding of the tasks and deliverables needed. Include any technical or procedural innovations that have been used successfully on other projects and which may facilitate the completion of the Task Order.

6. References
Provide at least three references (names, email addresses, and current phone numbers) from recent relevant work (previous 5 years) for the Key Team Members. Include a brief description of the projects associated with the reference, and the role of the respective team member.

6.2 Submittal Procedures
Please transmit one (1) electronic copy of your proposal no later than 4:00 p.m. on Monday September 16, 2024. If an electronic file is too large to submit via email, please provide a link to the file via a file sharing service such as DropBox. The submittals should be emailed to:

Margot Ocañas
Senior Transportation Planner
Sonoma County Transportation Authority
[email protected]
Proposals received after the due time will not be accepted. Proposals received shall remain confidential until the Task Order, if any, resulting from this RFP is awarded. Thereafter, all information submitted in response to this request shall be deemed public record. In the event that the proposer desires to claim portions of its proposal as exempt from disclosure, it is incumbent on the proposer to clearly identify those portions with the word “confidential” printed on the lower right-hand corner of the page. SCTA will consider a proposer’s requestfor exemption from disclosure. However, SCTA will make its decision based upon applicable laws. An assertion by the proposer that the entire proposal is exempt from disclosure will not be honored. The proposer is solely responsible for the costs incurred in preparing its response. SCTA will provide no compensation for such costs.

6.B.b
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: SCTA Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning RFP (4560 : Sonoma County Transportation Authority - Safe Streets for All SCTA RFP 23001-A-06
Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning 12 of 13

6.3 Cost Proposal
Once the top ranked firm has been determined, as part of the negotiation of the Task Order the selected consultant will be required to provide a cost proposal. The cost proposal shall not be submitted prior to entering into negotiations with the top ranked firm. The task order approved under this RFP will be developed on a cost-plus fixed fee basis. All compensation will be provided according to the hourly rate structure and overhead estimates originally provided in the cost proposal, which must be consistent with the rates previously approved under the Master Agreement in the consultant’s Exhibit 10-H2. The consultant must provideanticipated salary and overhead estimates for the full duration of the contract, as well as any anticipated special equipment costs. Portions of the work covered by the Proposal may be considered public works under state law, subject to prevailing wage requirements. Proposer should include prevailing wages as labor rates for such tasks. The top ranked firm will be required to assist SCTA in the preparation of any documentation required by FHWA necessary for approval of the Task Order.

7. GENERAL INFORMATION
All data and information furnished by the SCTA or referred to in this RFP are furnished for the proposer’s convenience. The SCTA does not guarantee that such data and information is accurate and assumes no responsibility whatsoever as to its accuracy or interpretation.Proposers shall satisfy themselves as to the accuracy or interpretation of all such information and data.

Lobbying: Do not contact members of the SCTA Board of Directors regarding this RFP during the evaluation process. Any party submitting a proposal or party representing a proposer shall not lobby any SCTA Director, staff, agent, or evaluation panel member regarding this RFP. Any party attempting to influence the RFP process through ex parte contact may have their proposal rejected.

The SCTA reserves the right to award the contract to the proposer or proposers that, in the SCTA’s judgment, will best serve the needs of the SCTA. The RFP process is considered concluded when a letter is sent to all participating proposers indicating which proposers will be recommended for SCTA Board approval. Please recognize that the firms recommended are not a final selection and no contract is certain until approved by the SCTA. The SCTA Board will make the final selection and may not choose to accept the recommendation submitted. If a proposer wishes to file a protest regarding the SCTA’s selection, they may present written or oral presentations at the SCTA Board’s scheduled meeting when the award of the contract is made.

Any protests shall be required to be submitted in writing to SCTA by November 1, 2024, to enable proper consideration.

6.B.b
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: SCTA Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning RFP (4560 : Sonoma County Transportation Authority - Safe Streets for All SCTA RFP 23001-A-06
Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning 13 of 13 Attachments:

A. Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan, Toole Design Group, 2022:
https://scta.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Sonoma-Vision-Zero-Action-Plan_Final-1.pdf B. Sonoma County Safe Routes to School Prioritization Analysis, W-Trans, 2022:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/7qewaqhmei1rumyucoq9m/B.-SRTS-Prioritization-Analysis-2.2.22-ReportOnly.pdf?rlkey=m5iz9uxrxfd75f9jctps8w71p&st=d9mvtcq7&dl=0 C. Healdsburg High School SRTS Engineering Evaluation, W-Trans, 2019:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/hkx1xc6hvcatnl6n4m667/C.-HB-HS-SRTS-Engineering-Eval04222019.pdf?rlkey=fgzgiglpklhy3ayax615iu0n1&st=xlsn1wti&dl=0 D. Sonoma County SRTS – Healdsburg Collison Maps and Bicycle and Pedestrian Level of Traffic Stress Maps, W-Trans:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/qmkfventbd3qoas28xymc/D.-Sonoma-County-SRTS-Healdsburgonly.pdf?rlkey=b1v9z3b2cgkjil26qheh3r0br&st=ylqx8giw&dl=0 E. Healdsburg Local Road Safety Plan, GHD, 2021:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/6edc9cauopq0t2qda4674/E.-Final-Healdsburg-LRSP-wAppendices.pdf?rlkey=uiwtskj4vfd09q8qx6y7q8sdx&st=4e3lnj1m&dl=0 F. Petaluma Local Road Safety Plan, GHD, 2022:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/hk7tj88vuwd0cg6sms9wi/F.-Petaluma-Final-LRSP_NoAppendices.pdf?rlkey=6j20ai45a0gnh6hsjaeajqy7f&st=01ixsik4&dl=0 G. Draft Petaluma Active Transportation Plan Maps, Fehr & Peers, 2023:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/00uiktrtg3vk1pfso0eax/G-AT-Plan-Maps-November2023_Petaluma.pdf?rlkey=18oc4n70wnhq7pxy42sr5ty3x&st=xg1olrtk&dl=0 H. SR 116 Rumble Strip EA 04-2W0404 Plans (Petaluma area limits only):
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/10f1nby3ler3747jewvxm/H.-SR-116-04-2W0404-RumbleStripplans.pdf?rlkey=zm8zhp9legkwxgn2ktedorns3&st=ryyp5tlw&dl=0 I. SR 116 District Director’s Order 1X210:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ukmwrihq3fmt6cyu4zycu/I.-SR-116-SignedDDO_1X210.pdf?rlkey=y9uoj0sj8xx46k4blnu3l0xxx&st=bhtv26lu&dl=0 J. SR 116 SHOPP CAPM Project EA 04-3G900K Conceptual Plans:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/7lec3fojpveap08zj10rt/J.-SR-116-04-3G900K_PID_PetalumaPlans.pdf?rlkey=778stfruyk8bbk66oca8u3cs8&st=84e5qiy7&dl=0

6.B.b
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: SCTA Vision Zero Action Plan Supplemental Planning RFP (4560 : Sonoma County Transportation Authority - Safe Streets for All Cooperative Funding Agreement No. SCTA24025
City of Healdsburg

COOPERATIVE FUNDING AGREEMENT NO. SCTA24025

BETWEEN THE SONOMA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE CITY OF HEALDSBURG This Agreement is made and entered into as of ____________, 2024 (“Effective Date”) by and between the CITY OF HEALDSBURG hereinafter referred to as “CITY” and the SONOMA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY hereinafter referred to as “AUTHORITY.” WHEREAS, AUTHORITY is coordinating various traffic safety projects being funded through a joint FY2023 Safe Streets and Roads for All grant award, which includes the City of Healdsburg – Engineering and Traffic Study and City of Healdsburg – Safe Routes to School Plan Update as recommended by the CITY, as more particularly described in Exhibit A to this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “Healdsburg SS4A Project”); and
WHEREAS, CITY has a financial plan dedicating funding to the Healdsburg SS4A Project which is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and
WHEREAS, CITY is willing to make available the amount of TWENTY-SEVEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($27,000) as local match for federal SS4A funding; and
WHEREAS, AUTHORITY is willing to manage grant funding agreements with FHWA, and manage the consultant contract to conduct work associated with and complete the Healdsburg SS4A Project.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, AUTHORITY and CITY do hereby agree as follows:

SECTION I
AUTHORITY AGREES:

1. Healdsburg SS4A Project. To work with consultant toward timely completion of the Healdsburg SS4A Project which includes the City of Healdsburg – Engineering and Traffic Study and City of Healdsburg – Safe Routes to School Plan Update.

2. Compliance with Laws. With regard to administering and completing the Healdsburg SS4A Project AUTHORITY shall at all times comply with all applicable laws of the United States, the State of California, and the County, and with all applicable regulations promulgated by federal, state, regional, or local administrative and regulatory agencies, now in force and as they may be enacted, issued, or amended during the term of this Agreement, including but not limited to compliance with all applicable prevailing wage requirements under the California Labor Code.

3. Records. To allow CITY to audit all expendituresrelating to the Healdsburg SS4A Project funded through this Agreement. For the duration of the Healdsburg SS4A Project, and for five (5) yearsfollowing completion of the Healdsburg SS4A Project, or earlier discharge of the Agreement, AUTHORITY shall make available to CITY all records relating to expenses incurred in performance of this Agreement.

4. Close-Out. Upon completion of the Healdsburg SS4A Project, AUTHORITY shall submit all receipts to CITY for review. All unused funds must be returned to CITY and any funds used for other than

6.B.c
Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: Cooperative Funding Agreement SCTA24025 (4560 : Sonoma County Transportation Authority - Safe Streets for All Planning Cooperative Funding Agreement No. SCTA24025
City of Healdsburg

the Healdsburg SS4A Projectshall be subject to immediate reimbursement by AUTHORITY to CITY.

SECTION II
CITY AGREES:

1. AUTHORITY Expenses. Upon execution of this Agreement, CITY shall pay AUTHORITY the amount of TWENTY-SEVEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($27,000), for a portion of AUTHORITY’s costs to complete the Healdsburg SS4A Project.

2. Notice of Audit. To provide timely notice to AUTHORITY if an audit is to be conducted.

SECTION III
IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED:

1. Funding Availability and Needs. The funding available to the Healdsburg SS4A Project for expenditure is limited to the amount of funds identified in Exhibit B and to approved appropriations by the Healdsburg City Council. If funds beyond those identified in Exhibit B are necessary to complete the Healdsburg SS4A Project, CITY will cooperate with AUTHORITY to identify and secure new orincreased fund commitments, although no such additional funds are guaranteed. CITY is the only party obligating funds in this agreement.

2. Term. This Agreement will remain in effect until discharged as provided in Paragraph 3 or 13 of this Section III.

3. Termination. This Agreement shall be subject to termination as follows:
a. This Agreement may be canceled by a party for breach of any obligation, covenant or condition hereof by the other party, upon notice to the breaching party. With respect to any breach which isreasonably capable of being cured, the breaching party shall have thirty (30) days from the date of the notice to initiate steps to cure. If the breaching party diligently pursues cure, such party shall be allowed a reasonable time to cure, not to exceed sixty (60) days from the date of the initial notice, unless a further extension is granted by the non-breaching party. On cancellation, the non-breaching party retains the same rights as a party exercising its right to terminate under the provisions of paragraph 3(b), except that the canceling party also retains any remedy for breach of the whole contract or any unperformed balance. If the Agreement is cancelled because AUTHORITY hasfailed to wholly or partially complete the Healdsburg SS4A Project, CITY may, at its option, demand repayment of all unexpended funds and funds determined by audit not to have been expended as provided for in this Agreement, with interest accrued thereon as would have accrued had such funds been invested in the Sonoma County Treasury Pool; and, further,to offset such balances due to the CITY from any other funds due from the AUTHORITY. b. By mutual consent of both parties, this Agreement may be terminated at any time. Upon termination by mutual consent, AUTHORITY shall repay to CITY any unexpended funds originally provided to AUTHORITY under this Agreement, and any interest that has accrued thereon.

4. Indemnity. Each party shall indemnify, defend, protect, hold harmless, and release the other, its officers, agents, and employees, from and against any and all claims, loss, proceedings, damages,

6.B.c
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: Cooperative Funding Agreement SCTA24025 (4560 : Sonoma County Transportation Authority - Safe Streets for All Planning Cooperative Funding Agreement No. SCTA24025
City of Healdsburg

causes of action, liability, costs, or expense (including attorneys’ fees and witness costs) arising from or in connection with, or caused by any act, omission, or negligence of such indemnifying party or its agents, employees, contractors, subcontractors, or invitees. This indemnification obligation shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages or compensation payable to or for the indemnifying party under workers’ compensation acts, disability benefit acts, or other employee benefit acts.

5. Notices. Any notice which may be required under this Agreement shall be in writing, shall be effective when received, and shall be given by personal service, or by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, to the addresses set forth below, or to such addresses which may be specified in writing to the parties hereto.

To CITY: Larry Zimmer, P.E.

Public Works and Transportation Director
401 Grove St.

Healdsburg, CA 95448
To AUTHORITY: James Cameron
Executive Director Sonoma County Transportation Authority 411 King Street
Santa Rosa, CA 95404
(707) 565-5373
[email protected]

6. Additional Acts and Documents. Each party agrees to do all such things and take all such actions, and to make, execute and deliversuch other documents and instruments, asshall be reasonably requested to carry out the provisions, intent and purpose of the Agreement.

7. Integration. This Agreement representsthe entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. No representations, warranties, inducements or oral agreements have been made by any of the parties except as expressly set forth herein, or in other contemporaneous written agreements.

8. Amendment. This Agreement may not be changed, modified or rescinded except in writing, signed by all parties hereto, and any attempt at oral modification of this Agreement shall be void and of no effect.

9. Independent Agency. AUTHORITY renders its obligations under this Agreement as an independent agency. None of the AUTHORITY’s agents or employees shall be agents or employees of the CITY.

10. Assignment. The Agreement may not be assigned, transferred, hypothecated, or pledged by any party without the express written consent of the other party.

11. Successors. This Agreement shall be binding upon the successor(s), assignee(s) or transferee(s) of the CITY or AUTHORITY as the case may be. This provision shall not be construed as an authorization to assign, transfer, hypothecate or pledge this Agreement other than as provided above.

12. Severability. Should any part of this Agreement be determined to be unenforceable, invalid,

6.B.c
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: Cooperative Funding Agreement SCTA24025 (4560 : Sonoma County Transportation Authority - Safe Streets for All Planning Cooperative Funding Agreement No. SCTA24025
City of Healdsburg

or beyond the CITY of either party to enter into or carry out, such determination shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement which shall continue in full force and effect; provided that, the remainder ofthis Agreement can, absentthe excised portion, be reasonably interpreted to give effect to the intentions of the parties.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date.

CITY OF HEALDSBURG SONOMA COUNTY

TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
By: By:

James Cameron, Executive Director
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO SUBSTANCE:

By: By:

Legal Counsel Authority

APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
FOR CITY:

By:

City Attorney

6.B.c
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Cooperative Funding Agreement SCTA24025 (4560 : Sonoma County Transportation Authority - Safe Streets for All Planning Cooperative Funding Agreement No. SCTA24025
City of Healdsburg

COOPERATIVE FUNDING AGREEMENT NO. SCTA24025

BETWEEN THE SONOMA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE CITY OF HEALDSBURG

EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTIONOF THE HEALDSBURG
SS4A PROJECT
Project Narrative/Description:

Sonoma County jurisdictions have worked collaboratively to prioritize surface transportation safety and have set a collective goal to end traffic deaths by 2030 (Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan – adopted by the Sonoma County Transportation Authority on March 14, 2022). The creation of the Sonoma County Vision Zero Action Plan (VZAP) was a collaborative effort led by the Sonoma County Transportation Authority, the Sonoma County Department of Health Services, and the Sonoma County Vision Zero Advisory Committee which includes representatives from local cities and towns, law enforcement, health care providers, climate change leaders, and advocacy groups. The VZAP includes an evaluation of current safety conditions and problem areas, including the identification of a “high injury network” (HIN) and “high injury intersections”, and includes a list of goals and actions that can be implemented to improve safety and that will help the county reach its Vision Zero goal. Local jurisdictions have concurrently been developing Local Road Safety Plans which evaluate local safety conditions and which propose local safety projects, policies, and programs.

SCTA was awarded additional funding through the Safe Streets and Roads for All federal grant program to build on the work completed to assemble the VZAP and LSRPs, in order to reduce travel speeds, to perform additional analysis and data collection related to school travel safety (safe routes to schools), and to develop additional data tools to support safety planning.

This supplemental work will help SCTA and Sonoma County jurisdictions implement projects on the ground and implement programs and policies that will allow Vision Zero goal to be met by 2030 and improve transportation safety for all groups in the county.

The Safe Streets and Roads for All grant program prioritizes safety, low-cost, high-impact strategies that will improve safety over wide geographic areas, equitable investments that meet the safety needs of urban and rural underserved communities, evidence-based projects and strategies, actions which promote equity, climate and sustainability, quality job creation, and economic strength and global competitiveness. SCTA supplemental action planning activities will address many of these priorities by identifying priority projects and actions and by moving these closer to implementation.

City of Healdsburg specific supplemental planning activities include the following projects:

TASK 2.2 City of Healdsburg – Engineering and Traffic Study - $60k City of Healdsburg staff and any selected consultants or contractors will conduct an engineering and traffic survey for the City Healdsburg which will identify areas where speed limit reductions are necessary to create safer road conditions for vulnerable road user’s such as bicyclists and pedestrians. This work will build on work completed as part of a countywide effort to develop countywide speed limit reduction best practices.

6.B.c
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: Cooperative Funding Agreement SCTA24025 (4560 : Sonoma County Transportation Authority - Safe Streets for All Planning Cooperative Funding Agreement No. SCTA24025
City of Healdsburg

Task 3.2 City of Healdsburg – Safe Routes to School Plan Update - $75k The City of Healdsburg desires to update previous efforts to conduct detailed Safe Routes to School planning for schools and areas surrounding and connecting schools within its boundaries. While the countywide safe routes to school planning efforts and plan development will focus on best practices, countywide conditions, and recommendations that could be applied in a variety of situations and in different cities, towns, villages, or jurisdictions, developing a local plan will make recommendations specific to individual schools, corridors, and service areas.

6.B.c
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Cooperative Funding Agreement SCTA24025 (4560 : Sonoma County Transportation Authority - Safe Streets for All Planning Cooperative Funding Agreement No. SCTA24025
City of Healdsburg

COOPERATIVE FUNDING AGREEMENT NO. SCTA24025

BETWEEN THE SONOMA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE CITY OF

HEALDSBURG

EXHIBIT B

FINANCIAL PLAN
Project Cost & Funding:

Fund Source
Task
Number
Responsible Party Total Cost
Grant
Amount Local Match
1 Supplemental Planning - Project Management

1.1 Procurement for Consultant Services SCTA $5,000.00 $4,000.00 $1,000.00

1.2 Grant Management & Contracting SCTA $30,000.00 $24,000.00 $6,000.00

1.3 Invoicing and Reporting SCTA $30,000.00 $24,000.00 $6,000.00 2 Supplemental Planning - Speed Limit Reduction Plan - AB 43 Implementation

2.1 Countywide Speed Limit Review and
Reduction Analysis and Best Practices SCTA/Consultant $175,000.00 $140,000.00 $35,000.00

2.2 City of Healdsburg/Engineering and
Traffic Survey Healdsburg/Consultant $60,000.00 $48,000.00 $12,000.00 3 Supplemental Planning - Safe Routes to School Planning

3.1 Countywide Safe Routes to School Plan SCTA/Consultant $625,000.00 $500,000.00 $125,000.00

3.2 City of Healdsburg - Safe Routes to
School Plan Update Healdsburg/Consultant $75,000.00 $60,000.00 $15,000.00 4 Supplemental Planning - Vision Zero Data Dashboard Enhancements and Automated Progress Tracking

4.1 Data Dashboard Improvements SCTA/Consultant $60,000.00 $48,000.00 $12,000.00

4.2 Automated Progress Tracking SCTA/Consultant $15,000.00 $12,000.00 $3,000.00 5 Supplemental Planning - City of Petaluma -

5.1 City of Petaluma - Lakeville Corridor MultiModal Improvements Study Petaluma/Consultant $250,000.00 $200,000.00 $50,000.00 TOTALS $1,325,000.00 $1,060,000.00 $265,000.00
TOTAL HEALDSBURG SS4A PROJECT TOTAL COST: $135,000
TOTAL HEALDSBURG SS4A PROJECT GRANT AMOUNT: $108,000
TOTAL HEALDSBURG SS4A PROJECT LOCAL MATCH: $27,000

6.B.c
Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: Cooperative Funding Agreement SCTA24025 (4560 : Sonoma County Transportation Authority - Safe Streets for All Planning

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 19, 2024
SUBJECT: Updated Public Electric Vehicle Charging User Fees for City-Owned Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
PREPARED BY: Terra Sampson, Utility Conservation Analyst STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):

Pursue Initiatives that Promote Environmental Stewardship Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Adopt a Resolution updating public electric vehicle charging user fees for city-owned Electric Vehicle (EV) charging stations through June 30, 2027.

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:

In October 2023, City Council adopted the Healdsburg Climate Mobilization Strategy (CMS), which included extensive community engagement and outreach activities. This item addresses multiple actions included in the CMS Implementation Plan.

On June 17, 2024, staff presented the City Council alternatives for City-owned public electric vehicle (EV) charging user fees. During this meeting the City Council provided direction for the structure of EV charger user fees.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Healdsburg adopted a CMS in support of State and Regional greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction goals. The CMS identifies key measures and actions that will be most impactful in reducing GHG emissions, are equitable, feasible, and community driven. The CMS includes an Implementation Plan, which presents the measures and actions to be implemented in the next 1-3 years. This item addresses the following actions from the CMS Implementation Plan:
• BE-1.4 Work with community groups, local organizations, and NCPA to … include information on time of energy use as it factors into carbon intensity and how community members can capitalize on using electricity when it has the lowest carbon intensity (e.g., when to charge electric vehicles and when to run space heating and cooling). Work with industry experts to help with demand response planning, developing strategies to increase

6.C
Packet Pg. 39
flexibility of the grid, and for informing consumers of carbon intensity of the electricity they are using to promote behavior change.
• T-4.3 … Continue to promote affordable EV charging rates at city-owned EV charging stations and adjust rates as necessary to cover program costs. Explore methods for charging different rates for different user groups or other programs to offset charging costs at public stations for low-income residents.
• T-4.6 … Develop programs that incentivize residents and businesses to charge during times of abundant solar resources and avoid charging during peak hours and grid emergencies.

There are currently 12 public EV charging connectors available at Healdsburg City Hall and staff are actively working to install more public EV chargers at other City-owned parking lots, including the Maher parking lot at 228 Healdsburg Ave and the Senior Center parking lot at 311 East St. Staff have also submitted an application to the Federal Charging and Fueling Infrastructure grant program for additional chargers at the Community Center, Recreation Park, High School tennis courts, and West Plaza parking lot.

The public charging stations at City Hall currently provide discounted charging with fees set at $0.55 per hour during the day and free at all other times (overnight and on weekends). While this has provided a great incentive and benefit for EV drivers, it also presents a few areas needing improvement. One of which is that Cap and Trade proceeds are currently covering over 80% of the electricity costs to support public EV charging, and as City-owned charging stations expand this level of incentive will be difficult to sustain. Additionally, the current fee structure provides very little motivation for EV drivers to avoid charging during peak energy demand periods (5pm to 8pm) or to move their vehicle when finished charging. These challenges are described in more detail later in this staff report.

To address these challenges, staff recommends adopting new user fee structures as outlined in the attached Resolution. The new user fee structure seeks to increasingly cover operational costs while remaining affordable for users, incentivize charging during periods of abundant clean energy, prompt EV drivers to move their vehicles when finished charging, and provide discounts for low-income CARE customers.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

The public EV chargers at City Hall have grown in their utilization in recent years, with 236,603 kWh (roughly equivalent annual energy usage of 40 homes) consumed in 2023 offsetting 267 MT CO2e greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Cap and Trade proceeds, which are allocated to Healdsburg by the State and must be used for the primary benefit of electric rate payers while reducing ghg emissions, provide funding for the public EV charging program. In 2023, electricity costs for the EV chargers were approximately $43,000 and approximately $1,000 was needed for replacement parts and materials. However, user fees collected only covered approximately $7,000 of these operational expenses.

Updating user fees to increasingly cover operational costs will free up Cap and Trade funds to further expand public EV charging locations, or for other electric-centric projects of the adopted CMS Implementation Plan.

6.C
Packet Pg. 40
Staff and local EV drivers have noted challenges when EV drivers do not move their vehicle.

Staff analyzed individual charging session data for 2022-2023 and found these key insights:
• Over all 19,354 successful charging sessions, the average charging session was 4 hours 43 minutes and 33% of the charging sessions were by a vehicle with a Healdsburg zip code.
• However, 47 charging sessions were longer than 24 hours and 25 of these charging sessions did not have any user fees (weekend parking). In other words, on average, once per month a vehicle parks for longer than 24 hours and pays nothing to do so. • Additionally, 21% of all successful charging sessions start between 5:00-8:00pm during hours of high grid impact. This is largely due to the financial incentive of free charging after 5:00pm.
• Weekday sessions during daytime only (7am-5pm) on average used 13 kWh and paid $1.50, an average of $0.11 per kWh. Of these sessions, 20% parked for longer than 4 hours, but only 3% parked for longer than 6 hours.
• Weekday sessions during overnight had an average length of 9 hours and 57 minutes and on average used 46 kWh, with no associated user fees. Vehicles with the Healdsburg zip code made up 49% of these charging sessions.
• Weekend sessions lasting overnight had an average length of 12 hours and 47 minutes with 58% of parking sessions over 12 hours and on average vehicles staying plugged in 5 hours and 20 minutes after their vehicle was done charging.

To address the areas for improvement while still providing affordable and convenient public EV charging, staff recommend, and City Council provide direction, to adopt the proposed user fee schedule outlined below in Table 1. The proposed user fee schedule increasingly recovers electric costs with discounted hourly fees during the day and overnight over the next three years, no incentive during peak hours, and a session fee every four hours.

Table 1. Proposed Public EV Charging User Fees for City-Owned EV Chargers 30-days after adoption July 1, 2025 July 1, 2026
~60% incentive during
daytime and overnight
~40% incentive during
daytime and overnight
~20% incentive during
daytime and overnight
7:00am-5:00pm
$0.70 per hour
5:00pm-8:00pm
$1.70 per hour
8:00pm-7:00am
$0.40 per hour
$0.50 session fee every 4
hours
7:00am-5:00pm
$1.00 per hour
5:00pm-8:00pm
$1.70 per hour
8:00pm-7:00am
$0.60 per hour
$0.50 session fee every 4
hours
7:00am-5:00pm
$1.50 per hour
5:00pm-8:00pm
$1.80 per hour
8:00pm-7:00am
$0.80 per hour
$0.50 session fee every 4
hours
The proposed user fee structure continues to provide an incentive for EV use and adoption, while

6.C
Packet Pg. 41
slowly beginning to recover the electric costs and help the program become financially sustainable in the long-term. It also conveys a disincentive for charging during high peak hours (5pm to 8pm). It is important to make charging available during these hours for those needing a charge while also providing a price signal to limit charging and avoid these times whenever possible. Additionally, the proposed structure keeps overnight charging affordable for residents who have no or limited access to EV charging infrastructure at home. Night and weekend charging fees encourage EV owners to move their vehicle as soon as they are able. Staff have added a session fee every 4 hours, per Council direction. Staff does not recommend increasing this to any higher than $0.50 to keep overnight charging (typically due to lack of charging infrastructure access) available and affordable for residents that rely on public charging options.

The daytime hourly fees are based on average hourly electric consumption. The hourly fee overnight is based on average overnight consumption spread out over the 11 hours, recognizing that we do not expect, and it would not be reasonable, to have EV owners move their vehicle in the middle of the night. Again, overnight charging is primarily a function of not having access to EV charging stations at multi-family housing, dwellings that only have on-street parking (ADUs), or other similar situations.

As a cost comparison, charging at home would cost a resident $0.29 per kWh, or $1.95 per hour, on Healdsburg’s Tier 2 residential rate. For PG&E customers, the estimated cost would increase to an average of $0.45 per kWh, or $3.03 per hour. As Healdsburg’s GHG Inventory includes a percentage of commuting vehicle miles traveled to the city, it is important to consider promoting commuting with electric vehicles by Healdsburg’s out-of-town workforce. Due to Healdsburg’s lower energy costs, commuters to Healdsburg will still be incentivized to switch to electric-based transportation.

Whether charging at home or at the City chargers, electric fuel is expected to remain cheaper than gasoline. In 2023, California gasoline was $4.881per gallon, costing $2,440 annually for the average gasoline vehicle. Charging at home in Healdsburg is estimated to cost at least 50% less than a gasoline vehicle ($1,160 annually on the Tier 2 rate, or $860 annually on the Off-Peak TOU rate). Even with the adjusted fees, staff estimates that Healdsburg’s charging stations will continue to be cheaper than most at-home charging within Healdsburg and significantly cheaper than outside the City’s service territory.

The proposed user fees are also in line with other nearby public charging fees. Examples of other fee structures include:
• Free, mostly to encourage increased business or customer benefit • $1 per hour plus $2 session fee, or $2 minimum and/or $24 maximum • $0.37-$2.50 per hour
• Additional $10 per hour fees after 4 hours or after charging complete • $0.35-$0.65 per kWh, mostly for fast chargers
The proposed user fees will increasingly recover the electric costs2to reduce the reliance on Cap 1 https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=pet&s=emm_epm0_pte_sca_dpg&f=a 2 Electric costs include: the applicable electric rate, monthly customer charge for each electric account, surcharges, and green rate additional charge. ChargePoint also has a standard 10% fee on user payments.

6.C
Packet Pg. 42
& Trade proceeds that currently fund the chargers’ electric usage. Cap & Trade proceeds will continue to cover other operational costs3and installation of additional EV chargers.

Under the State’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard program, as a public utility, Healdsburg earns credits for both an assumed amount of residential EV charging and charging completed at the City’s public EV charging stations. The City may sell these earned Low Carbon Fuel Standards credits to be used to benefit transportation electrification for low-income residents. These funds can be used to provide an additional discount for Healdsburg CARE electric customers wishing to charge at City-owned public charging stations.

To implement this discount, Healdsburg Electric CARE customers will be notified of this option to join a ChargePoint subgroup upon verification of their EV or Plug In Hybrid vehicle registration. Although creating the ChargePoint subgroup and administering discounted fees for a CARE subgroup creates additional administrative work, it is recommended to provide a discount to ensure public EV charging remains affordable and desirable for low-income residents, especially multi-family residents that largely depend on public charging options. Staff recommends a 50% discount applied to the entire rate structure as shown in Table 2 below. The simplicity of this structure will help streamline staff’s annual State regulatory reporting of Cap & Trade and Low Carbon Fuel Standards fund expenditures.

Table 2. Healdsburg Electric CARE Customer Proposed User Fees 30-days after adoption July 1, 2025 July 1,2026
7:00am-5:00pm
$0.35 per hour
5:00pm-8:00pm
$0.85 per hour
8:00pm-7:00am
$0.20 per hour
$0.25 session fee every 4
hours
7:00am-5:00pm
$0.50 per hour
5:00pm-8:00pm
$0.85 per hour
8:00pm-7:00am
$0.30 per hour
$0.25 session fee every 4
hours
7:00am-5:00pm
$0.75 per hour
5:00pm-8:00pm
$0.90 per hour
8:00pm-7:00am
$0.40 per hour
$0.25 session fee every 4
hours
If approved by Council, Staff will implement the first update to fees thirty days following formal adoption of the Resolution. Subsequent updates will be made in line with the new fiscal years on July 1, 2025 and 2026.

Following formal adoption in 2024, staff will also increase communications to notify EV drivers and public charger users of the new fee structure. This will include standard communications, such as social media posts and inclusion in the City Manager’s newsletter, as well as other methods to reach the target audience, such as emails to EV program participants and leveraging ChargePoint features.
3 Other operational costs include: ChargePoint user portal for managing the chargers, maintenance and parts, and staff time.

6.C
Packet Pg. 43
ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:

In 2023, the public EV charging program offset 267 MT CO2e GHG emissions. The CMS sets a goal of 30% EV adoption for passenger vehicles and 40% EV adoption for commercial vehicles by 2030, which would reduce GHG emissions by 7,636 and 2,000 MT CO2e respectively.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council may choose not to adopt the recommended resolution and provide direction to staff on an alternative user fee structure.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The proposed public EV charging user fees are intended to increase recovery of ongoing electric costs of the City-owned public EV chargers, which are currently funded in large part by Cap & Trade proceeds. The proposed user fee structure provides an incentive during the daytime and overnight hours of approximately 60% in FY24/24, 40% in FY25/26, and 20% in FY26/27. The proposed fee structure does not have an incentive during the high energy demand hours in the early evening and also includes an additional flat session fee every 4 hours. With all these factors incorporated, the proposed user fees are estimated to cover approximately 60% of energy costs in FY24/25, 75% in FY25/26, and 90% in FY26/27.

Actual operational costs and cost recovery will highly depend on EV charger usage, charging patterns, and additional charger installation. Staff will propose amendments to the fiscal year budgets as necessary to align with actual expenses and revenue.

Additionally, available Low Carbon Fuel Standard credits, which must be used for equity transportation electrification, will be sold to provide a separate low-income CARE discount on EV charging user fees.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

The Public EV Charging Program is not subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because the program is not a project, since it will not have a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect impact on the environment.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Resolution

6.C
Packet Pg. 44

CITY OF HEALDSBURG
RESOLUTION NO. -2024

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

HEALDSBURG UPDATING PUBLIC ELECTRIC VEHICLE

CHARGING USER FEES FOR CITY-OWNED ELECTRIC
VEHICLE (EV) CHARGING STATIONS THROUGH JUNE 30,
2027
WHEREAS, the City of Healdsburg owns and operates a publicly owned electric utility; and
WHEREAS, in 2012 the State of California established a Cap-and-Trade program to limit carbon emissions within California; and
WHEREAS, California’s Cap-and-Trade Program provides freely allocated allowances to Healdsburg Electric Utility, with the requirement that the value of allowances must be used to benefit electric ratepayers while reducing greenhouse gas emissions; and WHEREAS, Healdsburg also participates in the State’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard program and receives credits that must be used for equity transportation electrification; and WHEREAS, the City of Healdsburg has adopted a Climate Mobilization Strategy (CMS) in support of State and Regional greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction goals; and WHEREAS, the CMS Implementation Plan includes multiple actions for electric vehicle (EV) use, adoption, and load management; and
WHEREAS, the CMS also includes goals for 30-40% transportation electrification; and WHEREAS, updated EV charger user fees will help increasingly recover electric costs and address other areas for improvement in the Public EV Charging Program; and WHEREAS, offering a low-income discount on public EV charger user fees will help keep user fees affordable and provide access for low-income residents, especially multi-family residents that rely on public charging; and
WHEREAS, upon updating the EV charger user fees, City Staff will implement a ChargePoint subgroup for CARE customers; and
WHEREAS, the Proposed Public EV charging user fees comply with Article XIII-C of the California Constitution because they are charges imposed for a specific government service or product that are not imposed on those not receiving the service or product and do not exceed the City’s reasonable costs of providing the service or product; and

6.C.a
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Resolution (4535 : Updated Public EV Charger User Fees) Resolution No. -2024

WHEREAS, the Public EV Charging Program is not subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because the Public EV Charging Program is not a project, since it will not have a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect impact on the environment.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Healdsburg does hereby:

1. Find that the Public EV Charging Program is not subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because the Public EV Charging Program is not a project, since it will not have a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect impact on the environment.

2. Adopt the Public EV Charger User Fees and CARE EV Charger User Fees outlined in Exhibit A.

3. Direct staff to implement the FY24/25 fees thirty days following adoption of this Resolution and to implement subsequent updates in line with the new fiscal years on July 1, 2025 and 2026.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of August 2024 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAINING: Councilmembers:

SO ORDERED: ATTEST:
___________________________________ ____________________________________ David Hagele, Mayor Raina Allan, City Clerk

6.C.a
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Resolution (4535 : Updated Public EV Charger User Fees) Resolution No. -2024

Exhibit A
Table 1. Proposed Public EV Charging User Fees for City-Owned EV Chargers 30-days following adoption July 1, 2025 July 1, 2026
7:00am-5:00pm
$0.70 per hour
5:00pm-8:00pm
$1.70 per hour
8:00pm-7:00am
$0.40 per hour
$0.50 session fee every 4
hours
7:00am-5:00pm
$1.00 per hour
5:00pm-8:00pm
$1.70 per hour
8:00pm-7:00am
$0.60 per hour
$0.50 session fee every 4
hours
7:00am-5:00pm
$1.50 per hour
5:00pm-8:00pm
$1.80 per hour
8:00pm-7:00am
$0.80 per hour
$0.50 session fee every 4
hours
Table 2. Healdsburg Electric CARE Customer Proposed User Fees 30-days following adoption July 1, 2025 July 1, 2026
7:00am-5:00pm
$0.35 per hour
5:00pm-8:00pm
$0.85 per hour
8:00pm-7:00am
$0.20 per hour
$0.25 session fee every 4
hours
7:00am-5:00pm
$0.50 per hour
5:00pm-8:00pm
$0.85 per hour
8:00pm-7:00am
$0.30 per hour
$0.25 session fee every 4
hours
7:00am-5:00pm
$0.75 per hour
5:00pm-8:00pm
$0.90 per hour
8:00pm-7:00am
$0.40 per hour
$0.25 session fee every 4
hours

6.C.a
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Resolution (4535 : Updated Public EV Charger User Fees)

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 19, 2024
SUBJECT: Grove Street Neighborhood Plan Implementation (Complete Streets) Project Design Update
PREPARED BY: Clay Thistle, Senior Engineer
STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):

Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Receive a presentation on the proposed Grove Street Neighborhood Plan Implementation (Complete Streets) Project design and confirm Council support for proceeding with the final design.

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:

In early 2022 the City initiated an outreach effort to seek feedback on the vision for Grove Street between Grant Street and Dry Creek Road. An online survey was conducted, and a virtual workshop was held. Overall, approximately 270 community members participated.

On March 14, 2024, City staff held a Neighborhood Meeting with residents and property owners living and/or working on Grove Street to review and discuss initial design concepts and provide input. On March 28, 2024, City staff held a larger Community Meeting inviting the community to learn more about the proposed project and provide input.

Prior to construction, additional notifications will be provided to the neighborhood.

BACKGROUND:

On February 28, 2000, Council approved the Grove Street Neighborhood Plan (Plan). This area was originally developed under Sonoma County standards. The Plan was part of the process of annexing this area into the City of Healdsburg. The Plan provided a conceptual design for Grove Street, from Grant Street to Dry Creek Road to bring the public facilities up to City standards.

The Plan intended on “preserving existing neighborhood character and mature trees,” “allowing some on-street parking bays in conjunction with meandering the roadway to slow down traffic.” The plan recognized that “on-street bike lanes have the effect of increasing the street width, and an increased street width can encourage higher speed traffic.” The Plan also recommended a

8.A
Packet Pg. 48
Class 1 bike path (separated from the roadway) along the east side of Grove Street, however this was prior to the planning and construction of the Foss Creek Pathway. As a result of the planned, and at the time partially constructed Foss Creek Pathway, the 2008 (current) Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan calls for Class 3 (share the road) bike route on Grove Street.

Development that has occurred along the corridor has resulted in some frontage improvements based on the Plan. The partial improvements created discontinuous walkways, paved parking areas, and drainage improvements. The City could have continued to allow development to make improvements on Grove Street, however development was appearing to slow down in the area and it was decided to apply for grant funding to construct continuous infrastructure for this neighborhood.

On January 23, 2023, Council authorized staff to submit a One Bay Area Grant (OBAG 3) application for the Grove Street Neighborhood Plan Implementation (Complete Streets) Project.

The grant application included and committed the City to:
1) Improve pedestrian conditions by providing continuous curb, gutter, and ADA compliant sidewalk on both sides of the street, with connections to the two bus stops within the project area,
2) Make improvements as needed to the two bus stops,
3) Provide bicycle facilities with a class designation of Class III or better, 4) Reduce vehicle speeds by implementing traffic calming strategies including narrowing of the travel lanes,
5) Provide landscaped buffers and street trees between the sidewalk and roadway where possible,
6) Include stormwater treatment within the landscape strips to improve water quality as needed.

On May 24, 2023, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) approved OBAG 3 funding in the amount of $2,217,000 along with $283,000 in Go Sonoma Funds administered by the Sonoma County Transportation Authority (SCTA). The OBAG 3 Program is a competitive federally funded grant program which supports the goals of MTC’s long-range Regional Transportation Plan. OBAG 3 is administered through the Caltrans Division of Local Assistance in accordance with Local Procedures Manual. Federal funding requires iron and steel products and construction materials to be sourced and manufactured domestically. Federal funding dictates that all work must occur within existing City rights-of-way or easements, or the City must follow a lengthy process to determine fair market value appraisals and executing agreements with individual property owners.

On October 16, 2023, Council approved a Professional Services Agreements (PSA) with CSW/Stuber-Stroeh Engineering Group, Inc. (CSW/ST2) for engineering design services for the Grove Street Neighborhood Plan Implementation Project.

On November 13, 2023, the PSA was executed, and the design process began.

In advance of the roadway improvements, a separate City Electric project, Underground Grove

8.A
Packet Pg. 49
Street (EL005) will convert the overhead electrical and communications wires and equipment to underground. All overhead wires and associated poles will be removed. Streetlights currently mounted on wood poles will be removed and replaced with decorative streetlights. Additional decorative streetlighting will be added to meet the lighting standard requirement for the street classification.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

The design team held two community meetings and provided contact information for those unable to attend to provide their feedback separately. The first meeting was primarily for the residents that live along the corridor and will be directly impacted by the construction and improvements. The second meeting was for the entire community.

The adjacent property owners had more concern for parking, reducing traffic and speeds, and the direct impacts to their property. Attendees of the community wide meeting had all the same concerns, but with more discussions of possible bike facilities. All community members were excited to have all weather pedestrian facilities separated from traffic with improved lighting, while maintaining a neighborhood feel.

The design process began with understanding the physical constraints an existing mature tree, steep slopes, and limits of the public right-of way. Other constraints include budget, schedule, consistency with standards, and grant requirements. The objective of the design team was to balance these constraints with the community’s desire to create a project that provides the most benefit for the most people.

The most difficult issue has been balancing the community desire for bike facilities within the project. There are several different Classes of bike facilities:
• Class 1 is an off-street path, typically 8 foot wide minimum, such as the Foss Creek Pathway.
• Class 2 are on street bike lanes, typically a minimum of 5 feet wide. A “buffered” Class 2 lane includes an additional striped area (2-4 feet) to separate the vehicular and bike lanes.
• Class 3 facilities are where bikes share the lane with vehicles and signed as “bike routes” used to notify drivers as much as directing cyclists. Class 3 routes often include traffic calming measure to reduce the speed differential between cars and bikes. If calming measures are included and it is the recommended route it can be designated a “Bike Boulevard”
• Class 4 are bike lanes that are adjacent to the vehicular lanes but physically protected by parked cars, concrete barriers, curbs, or delineators.

Community feedback indicated a desire for the highest level of bike facility possible. After surveying the area, the initial step was to see what potential features could physically fit within the existing sixty foot right of way and assess the impacts. A Class 1 bike path would result in the loss of many mature trees, loss of space for landscaped areas, create negative impacts to adjacent residential properties, require property acquisition or property rights, and would far exceed the available budget. Additionally, it would be parallel to and immediately adjacent to the

8.A
Packet Pg. 50
Foss Creek Pathway, thereby providing limited new benefit to the community.

The design team next looked at the possibility of Class 4 and Class 2 on-street bike lanes. There is not adequate space for proper Class 4 protected lanes, which would have similar impacts as the Class 1 path. There is adequate space for Class 2 bike lanes but would come at the cost of a straight alignment, without chicanes or other traffic calming measures. A wider and straight alignment will increase vehicle speeds, which conflicts with the intentions of the project, and for this reason not recommended. Further widening of the road is costly and would result in insufficient funds for the other components of the project.

Parking, lighting, and landscaping were common topics of discussion at the community meetings, particularly among adjacent property owners. While some residents strongly emphasized the need to maintain on-street parking, others were unconcerned about the absence of parking along their frontage.

South of the Foss Creek Pathway entrance at the skate park, much of the shoulder area is unimproved, making it difficult to accurately determine the existing number of parking spaces. It is estimated that there are approximately 56 on-street parking stalls, with 39 located between Grant Street and the Foss Creek Pathway, and 17 between the Foss Creek Pathway and Dry Creek Road.

The proposed project includes parking locations based on residents’ input and conforms to current regulations regarding the setback of parking from intersections and crosswalks. The project will provide 35 parking stalls south of the Foss Creek Pathway and 15 stalls north of the Pathway, totaling approximately 50 stalls. However, if Class 2 bicycle lanes are added north of the Foss Creek Pathway, they will reduce on-street parking as follows:
• Northbound Only Class 2 Bicycle Lanes: 4 on-street stalls north of the Foss Creek Pathway and 35 stalls south of the Pathway.
• Class 2 Bicycle Lanes in Both Directions (Northbound and Southbound): No onstreet stalls north of the Foss Creek Pathway and 35 stalls south of the Pathway.

To evaluate the impact of parking removal associated with the addition of Class 2 bicycle lanes, the consultant observed parking occupancy during a weekday evening and a Saturday midday:
• Weekday Evening: 28 occupied on-street stalls, including 13 vehicles parked north of the Foss Creek Pathway.
• Saturday Midday: 19 occupied on-street stalls, including 11 vehicles parked north of the Pathway.

During the peak parking period, only about 50% of the on-street stalls are occupied.

If Class 2 bicycle lanes are added to both northbound and southbound directions on Grove Street between the Foss Creek Pathway and Dry Creek Road, no parking stalls would remain north of the Pathway. Vehicles currently parking in this area would need to find parking south of the Foss

8.A
Packet Pg. 51
Creek Pathway. As the project proposes providing a total of 35 on-street parking stalls, approximately 80% of these stalls would be occupied during the peak period.

Staff believes 35 on-street stalls is adequate for Grove Street as the optimal parking occupancy is generally considered to be between 70% and 90%, with 85% occupancy serving as a guideline to ensure that parking infrastructure is used efficiently without being underutilized.

The project scope as proposed will reduce the existing 12-foot travel lanes to 11-foot and add curb, gutter, and sidewalk where none exist. Typically, the sidewalks will be 6-ft and separated from the roadway by a 5-ft planting strip. The planting strip will allow for trees to be installed to shade the sidewalk and roadway pavement. 8-ft parking bays will be provided at alternating roadside locations in conjunction with traffic lane shifts (chicanes) intended to reduce traffic speeds. In conjunction with the utility undergrounding project, decorative streetlights will be installed to provide adequate lighting and maintain a neighborhood appearance. The lowered speeds will improve safety for bicyclists, and a raised enhanced crossing, with a bike exit ramp for southbound riders, will allow for safe access across Grove Street to the midblock Foss Creek Path entrance near the Carson Warner Skate Park.

The project as proposed maintains existing improvements, meets the grant requirements, and the intention of the Grove Street Neighborhood Plan. The result will be safe pedestrian access on ADA compliant walkways, with adequate lighting for all users, improved bus stops, and slower speeds so cyclist can comfortably share the lane. In addition to the project, staff will explore signage to direct cyclists to the Foss Creek Pathway as the recommended bike route, since inexperienced riders are often less comfortable sharing the road with vehicles. For those less experienced riders within the project limits, the new sidewalks and enhanced crossing will also allow access to the path.

As part of the recommended scope of work, staff is including Class 2 bike lanes north of the Foss Creek Pathway where the road widens and the adjacent land uses change. Adding bike lanes for this section does not require widening, impact trees or landscaping, and is relatively inexpensive since it only requires restriping. It will however impact parking in this area. Council could decide to defer this work to a later date or eliminate the addition of bike lanes without a significant impact on project cost or schedule.

The project was originally envisioned to include a full resurfacing of the pavement using City of Healdsburg Measure T funds in addition to the initial grant match amount identified. However, during budget development there were several other critical funding needs and only limited available funding. No additional funding for including paving within this construction project is anticipated in the current budget cycle. The road is in reasonably good condition and will be safe but will result in a less aesthetically pleasing “patched” look until pavement funding becomes available in the future.

ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:

Reuse, recycling, waste diversion, construction vehicle emission reduction, and storm water treatment will be implemented into the design and construction where possible. The project design will maximize preservation of existing mature trees and provide for the installation of

8.A
Packet Pg. 52
new trees to shade sidewalks, roadways and provide a visually appealing streetscape. The project will include bioretention to treat stormwater runoff as required by the City’s Municipal Stormwater Permitting. The goal of this project is to increase safety and provide improved facilities for active transportation thus creating mode shift and reducing vehicular miles traveled.

ALTERNATIVES:

Council may choose not to support the design as proposed and request that modifications be made. Modification made would need to ensure that OBAG3 Grant and Go Sonoma obligations and commitments remain intact or risk loss of the grant funding. Additionally, modification that increase scope would need to be supported by additional funding or equivalent scope reductions.

Council may also choose to recommend Option A, or to maintain Class 3 bike route north of the Foss Creek Pathway to minimize the loss of parking.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The project is included in the FY 24-25 Adopted Budget with approximately $420,000 for the design phase and $2,850,000 for construction, for a total budget of $3,270,000. Funding is comprised of $2,217,000 in OBAG3 Federal Grant funds, $283,000 of Go Sonoma - Move Traffic and Improve Safety (MTIS) funds, and $770,000 of local Measure T funds.

The project construction costs as designed is currently estimated at $3,474,000, which includes a construction contingency. This exceeds the $2,850,000 construction budget by $624,000.

Approximately $396,000 of the shortfall is for storm drainage improvements Staff recommend that amount to be funded by the drainage impact fee fund which has an estimated available fund balance of almost $600,000. The remaining shortfall of approximately $228,000 is eligible for and could be funded by SB1 (RMRA) anticipated revenues.

Funding decisions do not need to be finalized at this time. However, staff wanted to demonstrate a path to fund the project as currently designed. Final funding determinations would be requested at the time of construction contract award.

As the design process continues project estimates will be refined and staff is committed to guiding the project to align with the budget.

In order to keep the project within an attainable budget while meeting the grant commitments to pedestrian, bike and transit improvements proposed landscaping will be limited to trees and mulch. Roadway repaving and/or resurfacing will need to be deferred.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

The recommended action does not constitute a “project” under CEQA, pursuant to Section 15378(b)(4)(5) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

The project is subject to environmental review and approval pursuant to CEQA and NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) guidelines.

8.A
Packet Pg. 53
Currently the project is being reviewed by Caltrans as the NEPA lead agency and will subsequently receive City review for CEQA.

It is anticipated that the project will qualify for a NEPA Categorical Exclusion and CEQA Categorical Exemption.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Grove Street Plans

8.A
Packet Pg. 54
Prepared Under the Direction of: California State Of Sonoma County Of Healdsburg
City Of

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

GROVE ST IMPROVEMENT PLAN
- XX/XX/XX XXX XXX XXX XXX
P:\Shared\Projects\2023\2300211 City of Healdsburg Neighborhood Complete Street\DWG\Sheets\C0.0 - COVERSHEET.dwg 08/06/2024 - 03:01 PM alan 1:3.5602 Sheet Plan File: Project Number: 2300211 Scale: Date: 11/29/23 Rev Date Description Designed Drawn Checked 504 REDWOOD BLVD #310 NOVATO, CA 94947 415.883.9850 ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SURVEYING URBAN PLANNING WWW.CSWST2.COM ©2024 PRELIMINARY PLANS GROVE STREET IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT PLANS HEALDSBURG, CALIFORNIA FOR SHEET INDEX C0.0 COVERSHEET C1.0 TYPICAL SECTIONS C1.1 TYPICAL SECTIONS C1.2 TYPICAL SECTIONS C2.0 LAYOUT PLAN (STA: 1+00 TO 11+50) C2.1 LAYOUT PLAN (STA: 11+50 TO 23+50) C2.2 LAYOUT PLAN (STA: 23+50 TO 35+00) C2.3 LAYOUT PLAN (STA: 35+00 TO 38+47.88) C2.4 LAYOUT PLAN - OPTION A (STA: 29+00 TO 38+47.88) C2.5 LAYOUT PLAN - OPTION B (STA: 29+00 TO 38+47.88) C3.0 PLAN & PROFILE - FC LEFT (STA: 1+00 TO 6+00) C3.1 PLAN & PROFILE - FC LEFT (STA: 6+00 TO 11+50) C3.2 PLAN & PROFILE - FC LEFT (STA: 11+50 TO 17+50) C3.3 PLAN & PROFILE - FC LEFT (STA: 17+50 TO 23+50) C3.4 PLAN & PROFILE - FC LEFT (STA: 23+50 TO 29+00) C3.5 PLAN & PROFILE - FC LEFT (STA: 29+00 TO 35+00) C3.6 PLAN & PROFILE - FC RIGHT (STA: 1+00 TO 6+00) C3.7 PLAN & PROFILE - FC RIGHT (STA: 6+00 TO 11+50) C3.8 PLAN & PROFILE - FC RIGHT (STA: 11+50 TO 17+50) C3.9 PLAN & PROFILE - FC RIGHT (STA: 17+50 TO 23+50) C3.10 PLAN & PROFILE - FC RIGHT (STA: 23+50 TO 29+00) C3.11 PLAN & PROFILE - FC RIGHT (STA: 29+00 TO 35+00) C4.0 CROSS SECTIONS C4.1 CROSS SECTIONS C4.2 CROSS SECTIONS C4.3 CROSS SECTIONS C5.0 DRAINAGE PLAN (STA: 1+00 TO 6+00) C5.1 DRAINAGE PLAN (STA: 6+00 TO 11+50) C5.2 DRAINAGE PLAN (STA: 11+50 TO 17+50) C5.3 DRAINAGE PLAN (STA: 17+50 TO 23+50) C5.4 DRAINAGE PLAN (STA: 23+50 TO 29+00) C5.5 DRAINAGE PLAN (STA: 29+00 TO 35+00) C5.6 DRAINAGE PLAN (STA: 35+00 TO 38+47.88) ABBREVIATIONS AB AGGREGATE BASE AC ASPHALT CONCRETE AD AREA DRAIN ACR ACCESS COMPLIANT RAMP BC BEGIN CURVE BCR BEGIN CURB RETURN BF BOTTOM OF FOOTING BSW BACK OF SIDEWALK BVC BEGIN VERTICAL CURVE CB CATCH BASIN CJ CONTROL JOINT CL CENTERLINE / CONTROL LINE CP CONTROL POINT CR CURB RETURN DI DROP INLET DL DAYLIGHT DWY DRIVEWAY EC END CURVE ECR END CURB RETURN EG EXISTING GRADE EL ELEVATION EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT EX EXISTING EVC END OF VERTICAL CURVE FC FACE OF CURB FF FINISH FLOOR FG FINISH GRADE (SOFTSCAPE) FH FIRE HYDRANT FL FLOWLINE FS FINISH SURFACE (HARDSCAPE) GB GRADE BREAK HDPE HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE HP HIGH POINT INV INVERT JB JUNCTION BOX JP JOINT POLE JT JOINT TRENCH LF LINEAR FEET LP LOW POINT MH MANHOLE NTS NOT TO SCALE PB PULLBOX PC POINT ON CURVE PCC POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE P.C.C. PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PML POST MOUNTED LIGHT PRC POINT OF REVERSE CURVE PRO PROPOSED PT POINT OF TANGENCY PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE RP RADIAL POINT RW RIGHT OF WAY SD STORM DRAIN SDCO STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT SDMH STORM DRAIN MANHOLE SF SQUARE FEET SS SANITARY SEWER SSCO SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT SSFM SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN SSMH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SW SIDEWALK TC TOP OF CURB TF TOP OF FOOTING TG TOP OF GRATE TW TOP OF WALL tw TOE OF WALL TP TOP OF PAVEMENT UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE VC VERTICAL CURVE VIF VERIFY IN FIELD WML WALL MOUNTED LIGHT WL WATER LINE BENCHMARK THE BENCHMARK THAT CONTROLS THIS SURVEY IS THE FOUND 2 INCH BRASS DISK WITH PUNCH STAMPED "CITY OF HEALDSBURG". LOCATED IN A MONUMENT WELL AT THE INTERSECTION OF GROVE STREET AND W GRANT STREET. BASIS OF BEARINGS THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS MAP WAS ESTABLISHED BY A CONTROL FILE PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF HEALDSBURG ON DECEMBER 1, 2023. SYMBOLS EXISTING PROPOSED BOLLARD SIGN TREE / TREE TO BE REMOVED LIGHT - POST MOUNTED STREETLIGHT TRAFFIC LIGHT POWER POLE (WITH GUY) SANITARY SEWER - CLEANOUT SANITARY SEWER - MANHOLE STORM DRAINAGE - AREA DRAIN STORM DRAINAGE - CLEANOUT STORM DRAINAGE - CATCH BASIN STORM DRAINAGE - CURB INLET STORM DRAINAGE - DROP INLET STORM DRAINAGE - MANHOLE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER GAS VALVE PULLBOX FIRE HYDRANT WATER METER WATER VALVE FOUND / SET - BENCHMARK FOUND / SET - CONTROL POINT FOUND / SET - MONUMENT AS NOTED FOUND / SET - SURVEY STREET MONUMENT PP SSCO SSSDCO SD EM EM GM GM GV PB Y D
H WMWV LINETYPES EXISTING PROPOSED BLDG. ENVELOPE BLDG. SETBACK LINE BOUNDARY LINE CABLE TELEVISION CENTERLINE CONTOUR - MAJOR CONTOUR - MINOR DIRT ROAD EASEMENT ELECTRICAL LINE FENCE FIRE WATER FLOWLINE / SWALE GAS LINE GUARDRAIL JOINT TRENCH MONUMENT LINE OVERHEAD UTILITY PROPERTY / LOT LINE RETAINING WALL RIGHT OF WAY SANITARY SEWER STORM DRAIN TELEPHONE LINE TIES TOE OF BANK TOP OF BANK TREE DRIPLINE N/A WATER CTV 30E
F

GJT OH OH SS
T
W
GROVE ST PROJECT SITE SCALE: NTS VICINITY MAP 101101 OLD ROSSI PL

DRY CREEK RD SUNSET LN FARM STANDRD DRY CREEKRD W GRANT ST GRANT ST MARCH AVE HEALDSBURG AVE C0.0
COVERSHEET WEST GRANT STREET TO DRY CREEK ROAD FEDERAL PROJECT NUMBER: STPL-5027(025)

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Grove Street Plans (4561 : Grove Street Neighborhood Plan Implementation Project Update) RW 32' CURB TO CURB (STA: 1+00± TO 2+00±) TYPICAL PROPOSED SECTION OF GROVE ST 5' 6' 10' 11' 11' 9.5' 5' TRAVEL LANE WITH SHARROWS (NORTHBOUND) TRAVEL LANE WITH SHARROWS (SOUTHBOUND) (N) CONCRETE (E) PLANTER (E) SIDEWALK BUS PAD (N) PLANTER (N) CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 (N) CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 22' CURB TO CURB (STA: 2+00± TO 4+00±), (STA: 6+50± TO 7+00±) TYPICAL PROPOSED SECTION OF GROVE ST 6' VARIES 11' 11' 5' 6' TRAVEL LANE WITH SHARROWS (NORTHBOUND) TRAVEL LANE WITH SHARROWS (SOUTHBOUND) (N) PLANTER (N) PLANTER (N) CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 (N) CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 (N) CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 RW
(N) CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 RW
RW 30' CURB TO CURB (STA: 4+00± TO 6+00±), (STA: 10+50± TO 11+50±) TYPICAL PROPOSED SECTION OF GROVE ST 6' 5' 11' 11' 8' 6' TRAVEL LANE WITH SHARROWS (NORTHBOUND) TRAVEL LANE WITH SHARROWS (SOUTHBOUND) (N) PLANTER (N) PARKING (N) CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 (N) CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 (N) CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 (N) CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 RW
RW 5' (N) PLANTER
60' (TYP.) 30' CURB TO CURB (STA: 6+00± TO 6+50±) TYPICAL PROPOSED SECTION OF GROVE ST 5' 11' 11' 8' 6' TRAVEL LANE WITH SHARROWS (NORTHBOUND) TRAVEL LANE WITH SHARROWS (SOUTHBOUND) (N) PLANTER (N) PARKING (N) CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 (N) CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 (N) CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 (N) CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 RW
RW 5' (N) PLANTER 6' 22' CURB TO CURB (STA: 10+00± TO 10+50±), (STA: 11+50± TO 16+50±) TYPICAL PROPOSED SECTION OF GROVE ST 6' 5' 11' 11' 5' 6' TRAVEL LANE WITH SHARROWS (NORTHBOUND) TRAVEL LANE WITH SHARROWS (SOUTHBOUND) (N) PLANTER (N) PLANTER (N) CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 (N) CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 (N) CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 (N) CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 RW
RW 30' CURB TO CURB (STA: 16+50± TO 18+50±), (STA: 23+50± TO 24+00±) TYPICAL PROPOSED SECTION OF GROVE ST 6' 5' 11' 11' 8' 6' TRAVEL LANE WITH SHARROWS (NORTHBOUND) TRAVEL LANE WITH SHARROWS (SOUTHBOUND) (N) PLANTER (E) PARKING (N) CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 (N) CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 RW
RW 5' (E) PLANTER (E) SIDEWALK 22' CURB TO CURB (STA: 7+00± TO 7+50±) TYPICAL PROPOSED SECTION OF GROVE ST 6' 5' 11' 11' 6' TRAVEL LANE WITH SHARROWS (NORTHBOUND) TRAVEL LANE WITH SHARROWS (SOUTHBOUND) (N) PLANTER (N) CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 (N) CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 (N) CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 (N) CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 RW
RW 22' CURB TO CURB (STA: 7+50± TO 10+00±) TYPICAL PROPOSED SECTION OF GROVE ST 6' VARIES 11' 11' 5' 6' TRAVEL LANE WITH SHARROWS (NORTHBOUND) TRAVEL LANE WITH SHARROWS (SOUTHBOUND) (N) PLANTER (N) PLANTER (N) CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 (N) CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 RW
RW
Prepared Under the Direction of: California State Of Sonoma County Of Healdsburg
City Of

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

GROVE ST IMPROVEMENT PLAN
- XX/XX/XX XXX XXX XXX XXX
P:\Shared\Projects\2023\2300211 City of Healdsburg Neighborhood Complete Street\DWG\Sheets\C1.0 - TYPICAL SECTIONS.dwg 08/06/2024 - 03:01 PM alan 1:1 Sheet Plan File: Project Number: 2300211 Scale: Date: 11/29/23 Rev Date Description Designed Drawn Checked 504 REDWOOD BLVD #310 NOVATO, CA 94947 415.883.9850 ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SURVEYING URBAN PLANNING WWW.CSWST2.COM ©2024 PRELIMINARY PLANS C1.0 1" = 5'

TYPICAL SECTIONS
Graphic Scale (in feet)
0 1 inch = 5 ft.
5 5 10 8.A.a
Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: Grove Street Plans (4561 : Grove Street Neighborhood Plan Implementation Project Update) 31' CURB TO CURB - OPTION A (STA: 31+00± TO 33+00±) TYPICAL PROPOSED SECTION OF GROVE ST 6' 11' 11' 5' TRAVEL LANE WITH SHARROWS (NORTHBOUND) TRAVEL LANE WITH SHARROWS (SOUTHBOUND) (N) CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 (N) CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 RW
RW 4' (E) SHOULDER (E) SIDEWALK 5' (N) CLASS II BIKE LANE 31' CURB TO CURB - OPTION B (STA: 31+00± TO 33+00±) TYPICAL PROPOSED SECTION OF GROVE ST 5' 11' 11' 5' TRAVEL LANE WITH SHARROWS (NORTHBOUND) TRAVEL LANE WITH SHARROWS (SOUTHBOUND) (N) CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 (N) CURB & GUTTER PER CITY OF HEALDSBURG STANDARD DETAIL ST03 RW
RW
(N) CLASS II BIKE LANE (E) SIDEWALK 5' (N) CLASS II BIKE LANE 5' (E) GUARDRAIL (E) GUARDRAIL Prepared Under the Direction of: California State Of Sonoma County Of Healdsburg
City Of

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

GROVE ST IMPROVEMENT PLAN
- XX/XX/XX XXX XXX XXX XXX
P:\Shared\Projects\2023\2300211 City of Healdsburg Neighborhood Complete Street\DWG\Sheets\C1.0 - TYPICAL SECTIONS.dwg 08/06/2024 - 03:01 PM alan 1:1 Sheet Plan File: Project Number: 2300211 Scale: Date: 11/29/23 Rev Date Description Designed Drawn Checked 504 REDWOOD BLVD #310 NOVATO, CA 94947 415.883.9850 ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SURVEYING URBAN PLANNING WWW.CSWST2.COM ©2024 PRELIMINARY PLANS C1.2 1" = 5'

TYPICAL SECTIONS
Graphic Scale (in feet)
0 1 inch = 5 ft.
5 5 10 8.A.a
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Grove Street Plans (4561 : Grove Street Neighborhood Plan Implementation Project Update) GROVE ST.

STREET
W GRANT RHODES 615 GROVE ST. 089-130-006 LYNCH & CARLISLE 95 W. GRANT ST. 089-130-072 BAIOCCHI 629 GROVE ST. 089-130-007 089-130-012 636 GROVE ST. CRABB & GRASSECSCHI 089-130-008 645 GROVE ST. MAURITSON 089-130-011 654 GROVE ST. BERTOLANI 089-130-007 14670 GROVE ST. HBURG LLC 089-130-009 685 GROVE ST. STRONG 1 4
3 3
3 3
3 CL RADIUS R=250' CL RADIUS R=250' 40' TAPER END STA: 2+67.59 (11.63' RT) R=20' R=15' R=15' (N) PAVEMENT AREA 42 SF 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 2PARKING 10'X8' BUS LANDING
6' 6' SWPA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA SW SW SW SW SW DWY DWY 10'X50' CONC. BUS STOP PAD 11' 11'
(N) BIKE ROUTE SIGN TO GO TO FOSS CREEK 40' TAPER START STA: 2+06.23 (21.00' RT) GROVE ST.

SUNSET LANE MARTIN & KING 707 GROVE ST. 089-120-017 TAYLOR 713 GROVE ST. 089-120-038 SEGHESIO FAMILY VINEYARDS 700 GROVE ST. 089-120-090 ISAACS 753 GROVE ST. 089-120-015 MEJIA 757 GROVE ST. 089-120-014 WALTERS 771 GROVE ST. 089-120-013 089-120-018 699 GROVE ST. KOBY & VAN DUSEN 3 3
3 3
3 3 1
1 2
4 2
3 CL RADIUS R=250' CL RADIUS R=250' CL RADIUS R=250' CL RADIUS R=250' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' (N) PAVEMENT AREA 48 SF (N) PAVEMENT AREA 25 SF (N) PAVEMENT AREA 43 SF 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00
2 PA PARKING PA PA SW SW SW SW SW PASW PA SW PA PA DWY DWY DWY PARKING Prepared Under the Direction of: California State Of Sonoma County Of Healdsburg City Of

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

GROVE ST IMPROVEMENT PLAN
- XX/XX/XX XXX XXX XXX XXX
C:\Users\alan\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_29236\C2.0 - LAYOUT PLAN.dwg 08/06/2024 - 03:01 PM alan 1:3.5602 Sheet Plan File: Project Number: 2300211 Scale: Date: 11/29/23 Rev Date Description Designed Drawn Checked 504 REDWOOD BLVD #310 NOVATO, CA 94947 415.883.9850 ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SURVEYING URBAN PLANNING WWW.CSWST2.COM ©2024 PRELIMINARY PLANS C2.0 1" = 20'

LAYOUT PLAN
(STA: 1+00 TO 6+00)
Graphic Scale (in feet)
0 1 inch = 20 ft. 20 20 40
MATCHLINE STA 6+00, SEE BELOW MATCHLINE STA 11+50, SEE SHEET C2.1 MATCHLINE STA 6+00, SEE ABOVE KEYNOTES DETAIL 22 CENTERLINE PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A20A DETAIL 27B RIGHT EDGE LINE PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A20B SHARROW MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24-C BASIC CROSSWALK MARKINGS PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F DETAIL 39 BIKE LANE LINE PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A20D BIKE LANE PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24C CROSSWALK MARKINGS PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F TYPE IV (LEFT) ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24A TYPE VII (RIGHT) ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD 1 PLAN A24A234
5678
9 8.A.a
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Grove Street Plans (4561 : Grove Street Neighborhood Plan Implementation Project Update) GROVE ST. PINE RIDGE WINERY 782 GROVE ST. 089-120-076 BIGLIERI 781 GROVE ST. 089-120-051 BIGLIERI 789 GROVE ST. 089-120-050 CARTEE 801 GROVE ST. 089-120-049 KATZ & ROBIN 800 GROVE ST. 089-120-092 GROGAN 821 GROVE ST. 089-120-100 KELLEY 851 GROVE ST. 089-120-071 OBERDORFER 089-120-078 850 GROVE ST. 2 1
3 3
3 3
3 2 CL RADIUS R=250' CL RADIUS R=250' R=15' R=15' (N) PAVEMENT AREA 16 SF 11' 11' 5' 6' 5' 6' 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 PARKING PA PA PA SW SW SW SW SW PA PA PA PA DWY GROVE ST.

PLACE
OLD ROSSI 089-120-069 891 GROVE ST. 891 GROVE STREET LLC D-A OLIVER LLC 089-120-066 915 GROVE ST. 089-120-022 910 GROVE ST. BIGLIERI 936 GROVE ST. 089-120-021 FELCIANO 089-120-047 TEDESCHI 960 GROVE ST. 089-120-067 795 GROVE ST. LANCE 089-300-002 983 GROVE ST. FARM STAND GUERRERO 984 GROVE ST. 089-120-080 089-120-095 900 GROVE ST. THOMPSON 089-300-001 979 GROVE ST. FASSLER & URDA MARIA DEVELOPMENT CORP. 089-300-003 991 GROVE ST. TIERRA Y LIBERTAD INVESTMENTS LLC BABB 990,992A,992B,994 089-120-102 GROVE ST. GROVE ST. 3 1
3 4
4 1
3 2
3 3
2 3 CL RADIUS R=250' CL RADIUS R=250' CL RADIUS R=250' R=20' R=15' (N) PAVEMENT AREA 80 SF (N) PAVEMENT AREA 107 SF 6' 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 2
2 PARKING PARKING
8' 11' 11'
6'
11' 11' 5' 6' PA SW SW SW SWPA
8' SW DWY DWY DWY DWY 18" RETAINING WALL AT THIS LOCATION PARKING PARKING PARKING Prepared Under the Direction of: California State Of Sonoma County Of Healdsburg City Of

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

GROVE ST IMPROVEMENT PLAN
- XX/XX/XX XXX XXX XXX XXX
C:\Users\alan\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_29236\C2.0 - LAYOUT PLAN.dwg 08/06/2024 - 03:01 PM alan 1:3.5602 Sheet Plan File: Project Number: 2300211 Scale: Date: 11/29/23 Rev Date Description Designed Drawn Checked 504 REDWOOD BLVD #310 NOVATO, CA 94947 415.883.9850 ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SURVEYING URBAN PLANNING WWW.CSWST2.COM ©2024 PRELIMINARY PLANS C2.1 1" = 20'

LAYOUT PLAN
(STA: 11+50 TO 23+50)
Graphic Scale (in feet)
0 1 inch = 20 ft. 20 20 40
MATCHLINE STA 17+50, SEE BELOW MATCHLINE STA 23+50, SEE SHEET C2.2 MATCHLINE STA 17+50, SEE ABOVE KEYNOTES DETAIL 22 CENTERLINE PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A20A DETAIL 27B RIGHT EDGE LINE PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A20B SHARROW MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24-C BASIC CROSSWALK MARKINGS PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F DETAIL 39 BIKE LANE LINE PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A20D BIKE LANE PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24C CROSSWALK MARKINGS PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F TYPE IV (LEFT) ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24A TYPE VII (RIGHT) ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD 1 PLAN A24A234
5678
9 MATCHLINE STA 6+00, SEE SHEET C2.0

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Grove Street Plans (4561 : Grove Street Neighborhood Plan Implementation Project Update) GROVE ST.

STAND RD.

FARM SMITH 996 GROVE ST. 089-120-103 SAVIN 089-082-032 1020 GROVE ST. 089-082-25 15070 GROVE ST. CITY OF HEALDSBURG CARSON WARNER MEMORIAL SKATEPARK 089-081-09 DREW 1081 GROVE ST. ADAMS 15095 GROVE ST. 089-081-08 089-300-007 1051 GROVE ST. 089-300-004 1001 GROVE ST. FARM STAND DEVELOPMENT CORP. 089-300-006 1021 GROVE ST. FARM STAND DEVELOPMENT CORP. 089-300-005 1011 GROVE ST. FARM STAND DEVELOPMENT CORP. DAPRANO 089-082-031 1040 GROVE ST. KLEIN & SPARKS 089-082-033 1000 GROVE ST. FARM STAND PROJECT LLC GROVE ST. 2 1
3 3
1 2
3 3
3 CL RADIUS R=250' R=15' R=15' R=15' (N) PAVEMENT AREA 186 SF R=15' 24+00 25+00
26+00
27+00 28+00 29+00 2
2 PARKING
11'
8'
11'
6' 5'
6' 8' PA PA SW SW SW SW PA PARKING 089-081-07 15105 GROVE ST. PROCTOR 12" RETAINING WALL 089-081-07 15105 GROVE ST. PROCTOR 089-081-06 15135 GROVE ST. PUCCIONI 089-081-20 HEALDSBURG 1203 GROVE ST.MBLG LLC 1200 GROVE ST. 089-082-03 089-081-026 1241 GROVE ST. KINNE 089-081-18 DRY CREEK INN LTD 1261 GROVE ST.

FOSS CREEK
TRAIL
PACIFIC ASSOCIATES GROVE ST. GROVE ST.
1 2
3 7 3
3 3 CL RADIUS R=250' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=20' (N) PAVEMENT AREA 206 SF (N) PAVEMENT AREA 89 SF 7 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00
1 PARKING PARKING
6' PARKING MUP
8' PA PA SW SW DWY DWY DWY PARKING
11' 11' 7' BIKE ACCESS RAMP RAISED CROSSWALK Prepared Under the Direction of: California State Of Sonoma County Of Healdsburg City Of

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

GROVE ST IMPROVEMENT PLAN
- XX/XX/XX XXX XXX XXX XXX
C:\Users\alan\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_29236\C2.0 - LAYOUT PLAN.dwg 08/06/2024 - 03:01 PM alan 1:3.5602 Sheet Plan File: Project Number: 2300211 Scale: Date: 11/29/23 Rev Date Description Designed Drawn Checked 504 REDWOOD BLVD #310 NOVATO, CA 94947 415.883.9850 ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SURVEYING URBAN PLANNING WWW.CSWST2.COM ©2024 PRELIMINARY PLANS C2.2 1" = 20'

LAYOUT PLAN
(STA: 23+50 TO 35+00)
Graphic Scale (in feet)
0 1 inch = 20 ft. 20 20 40
MATCHLINE STA 29+00, SEE BELOW
MATCHLINE STA 35+00, SEE SHEET C2.3
MATCHLINE STA 29+00, SEE ABOVE
MATCHLINE STA 23+50, SEE SHEET C2.1 KEYNOTES DETAIL 22 CENTERLINE PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A20A DETAIL 27B RIGHT EDGE LINE PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A20B SHARROW MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24-C BASIC CROSSWALK MARKINGS PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F DETAIL 39 BIKE LANE LINE PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A20D BIKE LANE PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24C CROSSWALK MARKINGS PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F TYPE IV (LEFT) ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24A TYPE VII (RIGHT) ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD 1 PLAN A24A234
5678
9 8.A.a
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Grove Street Plans (4561 : Grove Street Neighborhood Plan Implementation Project Update) HOTEL VINEA 178 DRY CREEK RD. 089-082-028 BEST WESTERN DRY CREEK INN 282 DRY CREEK RD. 089-081-22 VALERO GAS STATION 186 DRY CREEK RD. 089-081-23 GROVE ST.

DRY CREEK RD ADJUST LOPS ON STREET SIGNAL FOR (N) BIKE BOX INSTALL "NO TURN ON RED" SIGN" ON OVERHEAD TRAFFIC SIGNAL 1 3 5 6 6 6 4 3 8 9 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 38+47.88 PARKING 10'X5' BUS LANDING 7' 11' 11' 11' DWY
6' 10'X50' CONC. BUS STOP PAD
2' Prepared Under the Direction of: California State Of Sonoma County Of Healdsburg City Of

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

GROVE ST IMPROVEMENT PLAN - XX/XX/XX XXX XXX XXX XXX
C:\Users\alan\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_29236\C2.0 - LAYOUT PLAN.dwg 08/06/2024 - 03:01 PM alan 1:3.5602 Sheet Plan File: Project Number: 2300211 Scale: Date: 11/29/23 Rev Date Description Designed Drawn Checked 504 REDWOOD BLVD #310 NOVATO, CA 94947 415.883.9850 ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SURVEYING URBAN PLANNING WWW.CSWST2.COM ©2024 PRELIMINARY PLANS C2.3 1" = 20'

LAYOUT PLAN
(STA: 35+00 TO 38+47.88)
Graphic Scale (in feet) 0 1 inch = 20 ft. 20 20 40
MATCHLINE STA 35+00, SEE SHEET C2.2 KEYNOTES DETAIL 22 CENTERLINE PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A20A DETAIL 27B RIGHT EDGE LINE PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A20B SHARROW MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24-C BASIC CROSSWALK MARKINGS PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F DETAIL 39 BIKE LANE LINE PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A20D BIKE LANE PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24C CROSSWALK MARKINGS PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F TYPE IV (LEFT) ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24A TYPE VII (RIGHT) ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD 1 PLAN A24A 234 5678 9 8.A.a Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: Grove Street Plans (4561 : Grove Street Neighborhood Plan Implementation Project Update) 089-081-07 15105 GROVE ST. PROCTOR 089-081-06 15135 GROVE ST. PUCCIONI 089-081-20 HEALDSBURG 1203 GROVE ST.MBLG LLC 1200 GROVE ST. 089-082-03 089-081-026 1241 GROVE ST. KINNE 089-081-18 DRY CREEK INN LTD 1261 GROVE ST.

FOSS CREEK
TRAIL
PACIFIC ASSOCIATES GROVE ST. GROVE ST.
1 2
3 7 1 CL RADIUS R=250' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=20' (N) PAVEMENT AREA 206 SF (N) PAVEMENT AREA 89 SF 7 6 5 6 PARKING MUP PA PA SW SW DWY DWY DWY
6' 5' 11' 11' 4' 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 BIKE ACCESS RAMP RAISED CROSSWALK HOTEL VINEA 178 DRY CREEK RD. 089-082-028 BEST WESTERN DRY CREEK INN 282 DRY CREEK RD. 089-081-22 VALERO GAS STATION 186 DRY CREEK RD. 089-081-23 GROVE ST.

DRY CREEK RD ADJUST LOPS ON STREET SIGNAL FOR (N) BIKE BOX INSTALL "NO TURN ON RED" SIGN" ON OVERHEAD TRAFFIC SIGNAL 1 3
5 6
6 6
4 3
8 9
6' 11' 11' 11' 7' 2' 10'X5' BUS LANDING DWY 10'X50' CONC. BUS STOP PAD 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 38+47.91 Prepared Under the Direction of: California State Of Sonoma County Of Healdsburg City Of

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

GROVE ST IMPROVEMENT PLAN
- XX/XX/XX XXX XXX XXX XXX
C:\Users\alan\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_29236\C2.0 - LAYOUT PLAN.dwg 08/06/2024 - 03:02 PM alan 1:3.5602 Sheet Plan File: Project Number: 2300211 Scale: Date: 11/29/23 Rev Date Description Designed Drawn Checked 504 REDWOOD BLVD #310 NOVATO, CA 94947 415.883.9850 ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SURVEYING URBAN PLANNING WWW.CSWST2.COM ©2024 PRELIMINARY PLANS C2.4 1" = 20'

LAYOUT PLAN - OPTION A
(STA: 23+50 TO 35+00)
Graphic Scale (in feet)
0 1 inch = 20 ft. 20 20 40
MATCHLINE STA 35+00, SEE BELOW
MATCHLINE STA 29+00, SEE SHEET 2.2 MATCHLINE STA 35+00, SEE ABOVE KEYNOTES DETAIL 22 CENTERLINE PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A20A DETAIL 27B RIGHT EDGE LINE PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A20B SHARROW MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24-C BASIC CROSSWALK MARKINGS PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F DETAIL 39 BIKE LANE LINE PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A20D BIKE LANE PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24C CROSSWALK MARKINGS PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F TYPE IV (LEFT) ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24A TYPE VII (RIGHT) ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD 1 PLAN A24A234
5678
9 OPTION A 8.A.a
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: Grove Street Plans (4561 : Grove Street Neighborhood Plan Implementation Project Update) 089-081-07 15105 GROVE ST. PROCTOR 089-081-06 15135 GROVE ST. PUCCIONI 089-081-20 HEALDSBURG 1203 GROVE ST.MBLG LLC 1200 GROVE ST. 089-082-03 089-081-026 1241 GROVE ST. KINNE 089-081-18 DRY CREEK INN LTD 1261 GROVE ST.

FOSS CREEK
TRAIL
PACIFIC ASSOCIATES GROVE ST. GROVE ST.
1 2
3 7 CL RADIUS R=250' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=20' (N) PAVEMENT AREA 206 SF (N) PAVEMENT AREA 89 SF 7 5
5 5
6 6
6 6
6 6 5' 11' 11' PARKING MUP PA PA SW SW DWY DWY DWY
5' 5' 30+00 31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 BIKE ACCESS RAMP RAISED CROSSWALK HOTEL VINEA 178 DRY CREEK RD. 089-082-028 BEST WESTERN DRY CREEK INN 282 DRY CREEK RD. 089-081-22 VALERO GAS STATION 186 DRY CREEK RD. 089-081-23 GROVE ST.

DRY CREEK RD ADJUST LOPS ON STREET SIGNAL FOR (N) BIKE BOX INSTALL "NO TURN ON RED" SIGN" ON OVERHEAD TRAFFIC SIGNAL 5 6
6 6
4 8
9 6' 11' 11' 13' 5'
2'
6 5 6 10'X5' BUS LANDING DWY 10'X50' CONC. BUS STOP PAD 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00 38+47.90 Prepared Under the Direction of: California State Of Sonoma County Of Healdsburg City Of

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

GROVE ST IMPROVEMENT PLAN
- XX/XX/XX XXX XXX XXX XXX
C:\Users\alan\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_29236\C2.0 - LAYOUT PLAN.dwg 08/06/2024 - 03:02 PM alan 1:3.5602 Sheet Plan File: Project Number: 2300211 Scale: Date: 11/29/23 Rev Date Description Designed Drawn Checked 504 REDWOOD BLVD #310 NOVATO, CA 94947 415.883.9850 ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SURVEYING URBAN PLANNING WWW.CSWST2.COM ©2024 PRELIMINARY PLANS C2.5 1" = 20'

LAYOUT PLAN - OPTION B
(STA: 23+50 TO 35+00)
Graphic Scale (in feet)
0 1 inch = 20 ft. 20 20 40 KEYNOTES DETAIL 22 CENTERLINE PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A20A DETAIL 27B RIGHT EDGE LINE PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A20B SHARROW MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24-C BASIC CROSSWALK MARKINGS PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F DETAIL 39 BIKE LANE LINE PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A20D BIKE LANE PAVEMENT MARKING PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24C CROSSWALK MARKINGS PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24F TYPE IV (LEFT) ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A24A TYPE VII (RIGHT) ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD 1 PLAN A24A234
5678
9 OPTION B
MATCHLINE STA 35+00, SEE BELOW
MATCHLINE STA 29+00, SEE SHEET 2.2 MATCHLINE STA 35+00, SEE ABOVE

8.A.a
Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: Grove Street Plans (4561 : Grove Street Neighborhood Plan Implementation Project Update)

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 19, 2024
SUBJECT: Arts and Culture Commission Structure
PREPARED BY: Mark Themig, Community Services Director
STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):

Provide Effective Governance
Provide Resident-Driven Community Services
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Review a proposed structure for an Arts and Culture Commission and provide direction to staff.

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:

In 2019 the City launched an arts and culture master planning process led by a community-based Creative Leadership Team and a consultant, the Cultural Planning Group. Over the course of three years, the City held numerous community meetings, stakeholder discussions, and other community engagement and outreach activities. Following City Council’s adoption of the Arts and Culture Master Plan in August 2021, staff continued to work with the Creative Leadership Team to develop an implementation plan, which City Council approved in September 2022 and is in process today. Representation from the Creative Leadership Team remains active and engaged.

BACKGROUND:

On June 20, 2023, City Council added a future agenda item to discuss creating an Arts and Culture Commission. The concept of creating an Arts and Culture Commission is part of the Arts and Culture Master Plan’s recommendations. (Page 15, Goal 1.2, https://healdsburg.gov/1025/Community-Arts-and-Culture-Master-Plan-D). On August 7, 2023, City Council discussed the creation of an Arts and Culture Commission and determined that this would be an item for consideration as part of the upcoming FY 2024-25 City Council goal setting workshop. On March 25, 2024, City Council established a goal for FY 2024-25 to “Consider an Arts and Culture Commission”.

The purpose of this agenda item is to provide a framework for the creation and future operation of an Arts and Culture Commission, and to receive feedback and direction from the City Council.

8.B
Packet Pg. 64
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

City Council currently has three standing commissions: Planning Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, and Senior Citizens Advisory Commission. Each commission has a specific charge that they carry out at the direction of City Council, and the commission’s activities are governed by the Brown Act. The composition, qualifications, powers and duties of the Planning Commission and Parks and Recreation Commission are codified in the Municipal code, Chapter 2.32. From time-to-time City Council has established other commissions and workgroups such as the Transportation Advisory Commission, the Housing Element Workgroup, the Community Housing Committee, and the Active Transportation Plan Advisory Committee.

In addition, staff has formed community-based workgroups such as the Creative Leadership Team that assisted with the arts and culture master planning process and the Parks Design Team that assisted with the park master planning process.

Staff researched similar commissions in other cities and received a commission structure proposal from the Creative Leadership Team. With these inputs, staff is proposing the attached structure for an Arts and Culture Commission. (See Attachment) For the most part, the proposed structure resembles the City’s existing commission structures, ensuring consistency from commission to commission. The proposed commission duties are modeled after the Arts and Culture Master Plan framework.

The creation of an Arts and Culture Commission will require a commitment of staffing and other resources to support the commission’s activities. The City is currently recruiting for a contract or part-time Arts and Culture Program Coordinator that will provide between 10-15 hours of staff support per week, depending on activities. In addition, the Community Services Office Assistant II, Recreation Program Manager, and Community Services Director will also contribute to supporting the Commission and continued implementation of the Arts and Culture Master Plan.

The extent of these contributions will depend on the activities underway.

City Council is asked to review and provide direction to staff on the proposed commission structure, and if desired, direct staff to proceed with creating an ordinance to establish an Arts and Culture Commission. The following is the anticipated timeline for the Commission’s establishment:

Aug 19 City Council considers commission structure and directs staff to create an ordinance establishing the Commission
Sep 3 First reading of the ordinance
Oct 7 Second reading of the ordinance
Oct 8-Nov 6 30-day notice period
Nov 6 Ordinance becomes effective
Commission is created
Oct 9-Nov 6 30-day commissioner recruitment period
Oct 21 Select Council Subcommittee to interview applicants Nov 7-Nov 15 City Council applicant screening and interviews (date/s TBD)

8.B
Packet Pg. 65
Nov 18 City Council appoints commissioners
Dec 10-18 Commissioner orientation (date/s TBD)
January 2024 First commission meeting
ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP:

Not applicable. This agenda item is for discussion and direction only.

ALTERNATIVES:

Do not proceed with creating an ordinance to establish an Arts and Culture Commission or provide alternative direction to staff.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The creation of an Arts and Culture Commission will require a commitment of staff time and funding for the Commission. The FY24-26 adopted budget includes $25,000 per year for additional staffing to support the Arts and Culture Commission and $50,000 per year to facilitate the implementation of the Arts and Culture Master Plan. Additional administrative, program, and supervisory support will be carried out by existing staff and budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

City Council’s discussion about creating an Arts and Culture Commission is not subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because discussing the creation of an Arts and Culture Commission is not a project, since it will not have a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect impact on the environment.

ATTACHMENT(S):

Proposed Arts and Culture Commission Structure

8.B
Packet Pg. 66
City of Healdsburg Proposed Arts and Culture Commission Structure City Council August 19, 2024
Component Proposed Notes
Title • Arts and Culture Commission • Titles used by other cities include Arts Commission, Public Arts Commission,
Commission for the Arts, Art in Public Places
Committee, Public Art Advisory Committee, etc.
• Proposed name reflects holistic vision
established in the Arts and Culture Master Plan
Membership • Number of Members: 7
• The City will work to recruit a youth commissioner under the age of 18 or full-time student under the age of 21 to serve as one of the seven members
• Residency: Healdsburg resident
• City Council appoints commissioners
• Youth commissioner opportunity consistent with
Parks and Recreation Commission
• Parks and Recreation Commission allows up to
two commissioners to reside outside the City
Limits but within the boundaries of Healdsburg
Unified School District
Terms of Office • Term: Three years
• Staggered Terms: first four appointments shall be for threeyear terms; other three members shall be for two-year terms, and thereafter the terms of these three members
shall be for three-year terms
• Serve until a successor is appointed and takes office • Term Limit: None
• Proposed structure consistent with Parks and
Recreation Commission and Senior Citizens
Advisory Commission
• Planning Commission serves up to a term of four
years and until a successor is appointed and
takes the oath of office; no term limits
Vacancy • Upon the death, resignation, disability to perform the duties, or upon the loss of permanent residency from the City; or upon the failure to attend any of the meetings of Arts and Culture Commission for three consecutive regular meetings, except in case of illness or for some other
unavoidable cause, the City Council shall review and, if found to be appropriate, declare the office of such member vacant and thereupon appoint some qualified person to fill such vacancy for the unexpired term of such member.
• Proposed structure consistent with Parks and
Recreation Commission and generally consistent
with Senior Citizens Advisory Commission

8.B.a
Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: Proposed Arts and Culture Commission Structure (4569 : Arts and Culture Commission Duties The Commission shall carry out the vision, goals, and strategies outlined in the City’s Arts and Culture Master Plan.

In doing so, the Commission shall:

A. Act in an advisory capacity to the City Council and staff on matters pertaining to the enrichment of the community
through fine arts, visual arts, performing arts, digital and media arts, arts education, community cultural activities and events
B. Serve as an advocate for cultural activities, community cultural programs and events, and the creative community within the City
C.Encourage the integration of art, cultural programs, and cultural events into the fabric of the City to enrich the quality of life for residents, enhance economic
development, celebrate diversity and inclusion, and
welcome visitors to Healdsburg
D.Promote arts and cultural activities of and in the City to broaden opportunities for residents, businesses, and
visitors’ participation in the arts
E. Seek, foster and enhance public, non-profit, and private partnerships in providing arts and cultural opportunities, programming, and funding
F. Identify and promote an inclusive creative economy that serves as an integral part of Healdsburg’s economic vitality G.Advise City Council on the City’s Public Art Program
including establishing a long-term vision for public art in Healdsburg
H.Provide guidance and recommendations to the City Council on programs and policies to further the goals of the Arts and Culture Master Plan such as arts grant programs and a
percent for the art policy
I. Develop an annual work plan that continues
implementation of the goals and strategies of the Arts and Culture Master Plan
Creative Leadership Team’s Recommendations:

1. Create an annual work plan that implements the
goals of the art and culture master plan. This will
include selecting artists or arts organizations,
placement and installation of public art,
scheduling, budgeting, and maintenance.

2. Develop criteria to solicit new works of
accessible public art that include but are not
limited to murals, sculptures, photography,
festivals, performing arts events, cultural
traditions, creative writing, film, digital arts,
musical performances, and creative
educational opportunities for youth that
enhance our community.

3. Make recommendations for city council
approval to implement new works, and to
maintain, relocate, or deaccession existing
ones.

4. Oversee art-based initiatives such as
community projects, workshops, and
exhibitions both as a means of personal
expression and to promote healing after
disastrous events.

5. Work with the community services dept in
approving percent for art projects and direct the
public art fund for in-lieu developer fees.

8.B.a
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Proposed Arts and Culture Commission Structure (4569 : Arts and Culture Commission Component Proposed Notes
Officers • Chair and Vice-Chair appointed by the Commission annually
Meetings • Fourth Wednesday of each month at 6:00 p.m.
• City Council Chambers
• Special meetings may be called at any time by the Chair or any four or more members of the Commission
• Alternatively, meetings could be held the fourth
Wednesday of each month at 6:00 p.m.,
alternating monthly with the Senior Citizens
Advisory Commission

8.B.a
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: Proposed Arts and Culture Commission Structure (4569 : Arts and Culture Commission

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: August 19, 2024
SUBJECT: Discussion on Formula Business Regulations in Downtown Healdsburg PREPARED BY: Scott Duiven, Community Development Director STRATEGIC INITIATIVE(S):

Establish Proactive Policies/Programs to Continue to Promote Economic Diversity & Sustainable Growth
Provide Effective Governance
RECOMMENDED ACTION(S):

Discuss and provide direction on formula businesses in Downtown Healdsburg.

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT/OUTREACH:

At the May 6, 2024, City Council meeting, in response to comments made during “Public Comment on Non-Agenda Items” the Council requested during “Council Reports” that a discussion about formula businesses in Downtown Healdsburg be placed on a future agenda, after the July recess.

BACKGROUND:

The existing Healdsburg 2030 General Plan includes the following definition, policies, and implementation measures related to Formula Businesses:

Formula Business Definition
Formula business: A business that is generally required by contractual or other arrangement to maintain any of the following: standardized services, menus, decor, uniforms, architecture, signs or other similar features and is not part of a locally- or regionally-based group of businesses.

Formula Business General Plan Policies
LU-D-5 Formula businesses are prohibited on properties around the historic Plaza in order to preserve its character of small, unique businesses that are attractive to residents and visitors.

ED-B-3 Formula businesses shall be prohibited on properties around the Plaza in order to support local- and independently-owned businesses and protect and enhance Healdsburg’s unique character.

9.A
Packet Pg. 70
Formula Business Implementation Measures
LU-16 Amend the Zoning Ordinance to:
a. Regulate formula businesses for properties around the Plaza. b. Prohibit big box retail businesses and outlet malls throughout the city. c. Regulate large single-tenant commercial buildings around the Plaza.

ED-12 Amend the Zoning Ordinance to:
a. Prohibit formula businesses on properties around the Plaza b. Ensure that development outside of the downtown complements, but does not compete with, its role as the city’s commercial core
c. Regulate large single-tenant commercial buildings around the Plaza Land Use Code amendments were originally prepared to implement the above policies and implementation measures in 2011. The amendments were noticed to be reviewed by the City Council on June 20, 2011. However, the amendments were pulled prior to the packet being published and were never rescheduled. The proposed amendments approved by the Planning Commission at that time made Formula Businesses prohibited in the Plaza Retail District and permitted by right in the Downtown Commercial and Service Commercial zones.

In the absence of adopted Land use Code amendments, staff continues to implement and enforce the prohibition on formula businesses around the Plaza, pursuant to the General Plan polices noted above. As with the ordinance proposed in 2011, this has been interpreted to apply to properties within the Plaza Retail District.

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:

Per City Council protocols no formal discussion or analysis shall be prepared for this item and the primary purpose is for the Council to discuss and provide direction to staff.

ALTERNATIVES:
• Direct staff to continue to implement the General Plan policies related to Formula Businesses without an ordinance updating the Land Use Code. • Direct staff to bring back policy options aimed at clarifying or modifying implementation of policies limiting Formula Businesses as part of a future Council goal setting session. • Direct staff to bring back policy options aimed at clarifying or modifying implementation of policies limiting Formula Businesses as part of a future Council meeting. • Direct staff to refer the issue of regulating Formula Businesses to the Planning Commission for review and input in advance of preparing an ordinance.

FISCAL IMPACT:

This report is for informational purposes only. If this item moves forward to a future meeting, staff will analyze fiscal impact at that time.

CEQA ANALYSIS:

This staff report is for informational purposes only which is not considered 'project' as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (CEQA Guidelines§15378). Consequently, no CEQA action is required.

9.A
Packet Pg. 71
8/14/2024 – Page 1

CITY OF HEALDSBURG

CITY COUNCIL FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
(NOTE: The schedule is tentative and subject to change pending final publication and posting of the City Council meeting agenda) September 3, 2024 Employee Anniversaries – Brian Crabb, Nicholas Doherty & Kris Kuntz (10 years) (Tuesday) Latin American Heritage Month Proclamation
Saggio Hills and Badger Park Design – Contract Approval 2023 Power Content Label
Amendment to Professional Services Agreement with RRM Design Group for Architectural Construction Support and Testing Services related to the North Village Fire Substation Recycled Water Easement on Oak Mound Cemetery
Proposed Reorganization and Authorized Positions to Finance and Police Departments Arts and Culture Commission Ordinance – 1
st Reading
Discussion of Future Planning Efforts to support Residential Development within Targeted Areas Establish Municipal Recycled Water Rates for Fiscal Years 2024-25 through 2029-30 September 16, 2024 Pollution Prevention and Creek Week Proclamation California Native American Day Proclamation
Memorandum of Understanding to be a member agency in the Russian River Reuse Collective (R3C) Review Capital Improvement Program and Reestablish Appropriations for Continuing Projects Notice of Completion for Fitch Mountain Public Access Improvement Project Parking Ordinance Update
Mill District – Development Agreement Amendment
Climate Mobilization Strategy Annual Update
October 7, 2024 International Active Aging Week Proclamation Domestic Violence Awareness Month Proclamation
Arts and Culture Commission Ordinance – Second Reading

13.1.a
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: Agenda Planning Sheet (4575 : Future Agenda Items - August 5, 2024) 8/14/2024 – Page 2
Revisions to the Memorandum of Understanding with 421 Foss Street LLC (Duchamp Hotel) for the Foley Family Community Pavilion Project
Discussion of Future Fireworks Shows and Possible Alternatives Emergency Operations Plan update adoption
Saggio Hills Development Park Naming Proposals
Active Transportation Plan Presentation
(NOTE: The schedule is tentative and subject to change pending final publication and posting of the City Council meeting agenda)

13.1.a
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: Agenda Planning Sheet (4575 : Future Agenda Items - August 5, 2024)